s ook’s Manual of the Apiary — ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY EVERETT FRANKLIN PHILLIPS BEEKEEPING LIBRARY NALA AG 1924 067 980 7 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www. archive.org/details/cu31924067980767 THE Bee-Keeper's Guide: ——OR-——— MANUAL OF THE APIARY, —BY~ A, J. COOK, Late Professor of Entomology in the Michigan State Agricultural College, Prof of Zoology P. College, Claremont, California, AUTHOR OF "Injurious Insects of Michigan," " Maple Sugar and the Sugar Bush," and "Silo and Silage.” NINETEENTH EDITION. Revised, Enlarged, Re-Written and Beautifully Illustrated. TWENTY-FIRST THOUSAND, CHICAGO, ILL. GEORGE W. YORK & COMPANY, PUBLISHERS. 1910, Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1883, by ALBERT J. COOK, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D.C. TO THE REVEREND L. L. LANGSTROTH, THE INVENTOR OF THE MOVABLE-FRAME HIVE, THE HUBER OF AMERICA, AND ONE OF THE GREATEST MASTERS OF PURE AND APPLIED SCIENCE, AS RELATING TO APICULTURE, IN THE WORLD, THIS MANUAL IS GRATEFULLY DEDICATED BY THE AUTHOR. PREFACE. In 1876, in response to a desire frequently expressed by my aplarian friends, principally my students, I published an edition of 3000 copies of the little, unpretending ‘‘ Manual of the Apiary.”? This was little more than the course of lectures which I gave annually at the Michigan Agri- cultural College. In less than two years this was exhausted, and the second edition, enlarged, revised, and much more fully illustrated, was issued. So great was the sale that in less than a year this was followed by the third and fourth editions, and, in less than two years, the fifth edition (seventh thousand) was issued. In each of the two following years, another edition was demanded. ‘In each of these editions the book has been enlarged, changes made, and illustrations added, that the book might keep pace with our rapidly advancing art. So great has been the demand for this work, not only at home and in Europe, but even in more distant lands, and so great has been the prog- ress of apiculture—so changed the views and methods of our best bee- keepers—that the author feels warranted ‘in thoroughly revising and entirely recasting this eighth edition (tenth thousand). Not only is the work re-written, but much new matter, and many new and costly illus- trations, are added. The above I quote directly from the preface of the eighth edition, published in 1883. Since then four editions have appeared, each reyised as the progress of the art required. In electrotyping the eighth edition, through an accident very poor work was done, so that the impressions of the last three editions have been far from satisfactory. This has led me wholly to revise the present, or thirteenth edition. In doing this Ihave thought it wise to add largely, especially to the scientific portion, as the intelligence of our bee-keepers demands the fullest information. JI have thus added one hundred and fifty pages and more than thirty illustrations. All this has involved so PREFACE. much expense that Iam forced, though very reluctantly, to increase the price of the work. As our bee-keepers know, I have permitted wide use of the illustra- tions prepared expressly for this work, believing heartily in the motto, ‘‘ greatest good to the greatest number;’? sol have drawn widely from others. J am greatly indebted to all these, and have given credit with the illustration. Since the above was penned three editions have appeared, the last, sixteenth, in 1899. Each has been revised. Both the science and prac- tice have so advanced that I now recast entirely this, the seventeenth edition. I wish again to express my thanks and gratitude to our wide-awake American apiarists, without whose aid it would have peen impossibte to have written this work. I am under special obligation to Messrs. Cowan, York and Root, and to my students who have aided me, both in the apiary and laboratory. As I stated in the preface tothe eighth edition, it is mysdesi:e and determination that this work shall continue to be the exponent of the most improved apiculture; and no pains will be spared, that each suc- ceeding edition may embody the latest improvements and discoveries wrought out by the practical man and the scientist, as gleaned from the excellent home and foreign apiarian and scientific periodicals. The above was prefaced to the Eighteenth one thousand published in 1900. This Nineteenth one thousand has been wholly revised, about 80 pages and 75 engravings added. We believe it is now at the frontin bee-keeping science and practice. A. J. COOK. Pomona College, Claremont, California, 1902. CONTENTS. Introduction.—p. 13. Who May Keep Bees. Specialists, Amateurs, Who Should Not Keep Bees, Inducements to Bee-Keeping, Recreation, Profits, Excellence as an Amateur Pursuit, Adaptation to Women, Improves the Mind, the Observation and Heart, Yields Delicious Food, Brings the Second Blade of Grass, Adds to the Nation’s Wealth, What Successful Bee-Keeping Re- quires, Mental Effort, Experience Necessary, Learn from Others, Aid from Conventions, Aid from Bee- Journals, American Bee Journal, Gleanings in Bee-Culture, -Bee- Keepers’ Review, Canadian Bee Journal, American Bee-Keeper, Progressive Bee-Keeper, Lone Star Apiarist, Books for the Apiarist, Langstroth on the Honey-Bee, A B C of Bee-Culture, Bees and Honey, Scientific Queen-Rearing, Advanced Bee-Culture, Bee-Keeping for Be- ginners, Foreign _ Publications, British Bee Journal, Foreign Books, Promptitude, Enthusiasm. Part I. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE HONEY- BEE. CHAPTER I.—p. 31. The Bee's Place in the Animal King- dom, Branch of the Honey-Bee, The Class of the Honey-Bee, Order of the Honey-Bee, Family of the Honey-Bee, The Genus of the Honey-Bee, Species of Our Honey- Bees, Races of the Honey-Bee, Ger- man or Black Bee, Ligurian or Ital- ian, The Syrian and Cyprian Races, Other Races, Bibliography, Val- uable Books for the Student of Entomology. CHAPTER II.—p. 64. Anatomy and Physiology. Anatomy of Insects, Organs of the Head, Appendages of the Thorax, Internal Anatomy of In- sects, Secretory Organs of Insects, Sex-Organs of Insects, Transforma- tion of Insects, The Egg,The Larva of Insects, The Pupa of Insects, The Imago Stage, Incomplete Trans- formation, Anatomy and Physiology of the Honey-Bee, Three Kinds of Bees in each Family, The Queen- Bee, Structure and Natural His- tory, The Drones, The Neuters or Workers, Glandular Organs. CHAPTER III.—p. 165. Swarming, vr Natural Methods of Increase, CHAPTER IV.—p. 171. Products of Bees, their Origin and Function. Honey, Wax, Pollen,or Bee-Bread, Propolis, Bibliography. x CONTENTS. Part II. THE APIARY, ITS CARE AND MAN- AGEMENT. INTRODUCTION.—p. 201. Starting an Apiary. Preparation, Read a Good Man- ual, Visit Some Apiarist, Take a College Course, Decide on .a Plan, How to Procure First Colonies, Kind of Bees to Purchase, In What Kind of Hives, When to Purchase, iow Much to Pay, Where to Locate CHAPTER V-—p. 207, ITives and Sections. Box-Hives, Movable-Comb Hives, Early Frame Hives, The Langstroth Hive, Character of the Hive, What Styleto Adopt, The Heddon Sur- plus-Case, The Cover, Division- Board, Cloth Covers, The New Heddon Hive, The Frames, A Block for Making Frames, Cover for Frames, the Huber Hive, Observa- tory Hive, Apparatus for Procuring Comb Honey, Surplus Comb Honey in Sections, How to Place Sections in Position, Sections in Frames, Crates or Racks, Fences, Separa- tors, Foot-Power Saw. CHAPTER VI.—p. 253. Positionaud drranyement of Apiary Position, Arrangement of Grounds, Preparation for Each Colony. CHAPTER VII.—p. 258. To Transfer Bees. The Old Method, Hunting Bee- Trees. CHAPTER VIII.—p. 2t4. Feeding and Feeders, What to Feed, How to Feed, Smith Feeder. CHAPTER IX.—p. 273. Quecn- Rearing. How to Rear Queens, Nuclei, Queen Lamp-Nursery, Shall We Clip the Queen’s Wing? Laying Workers, Queen Register, or Api- ary Register. CHAPTER X.—p. 293. Increase of Colonies. Swarming, Hiving Swarms, To Prevent Second Swarms, To Pre- vent Swarming, Artificial Increase, How to Divide, Capturing Abscond- ing Swarms. CHAPTER XI.—p. 306. Ltalians and Mtalianizing. The New Races of Bees, What Bees Shall We Keep ? How to Ital- ianize, How to Introduce a Queen, Valentine’s Comb Stand, To Get Our Italian Queens, To Ship Queens, The ‘‘ Good’ Candy, Prep- arations to Ship, To Move Colonies. CHAPTER XII.—p. 321. Ratracting, and the Extractor, Honey-Extractor, Desirable Points in an Extractor, Use of Extractor, When _to Use the Extractor, To Keep Extracted Honey. CHAPTER XIII.—p. 335. Working for Comb Honey. Points to Consider, To Secure Strong Colonies, To Avoid the Swarming Fever, Adjustment of Sections, Getting Bees into Sec- tions, Removal of Sections. CONTENTS. xi CHAPTER XIV.—p. 343. Handling Bees. The Best Bee-Veil, To Quiet Bees, Bellows Smoker, The Quinby Smoker, To Smoke Bees, Chloro- form, To Cure Stings, The Sweat Theory, The Bee-Tent. CHAPTER XV.—p. 3853. Comb Foundation. History, American Foundation, The Press for Foundation, How Foundation is Made, To Secure the Wax-Sheets, Use of Foundation, Wired Frames, Save the Wax, Methods, Wax-Press. CHAPTER XVI.—>p. 373. Marketing Honey. How to Invigorate the Market, Preparation for Market, Extracted Honey, How to Tempt the Con- sumer, Comb Honey, Rules to be Observed, Marketing Bees, Selling Queens, Selling Bees by the Pound, Vinegar from Honey, Fairs and the Market, What Should We Have ? Effects of Such Exhibits. CHAPTER XVII.—p. 389. Honey-Plants. Real Honey-Dew, Sweet Sap and Juices, What are the Valuable Honey-Plants ? Description With Practical Remarks, March Plants, April Plants, May Plants, June Plants, July Plants, August and September Plants, Books on Botany, Practical Conclusions. CHAPTER XVIII.—p. 454. Wintering Bees. The Causes of Disastrous Win- tering, The Requisite to Safe Win- tering—Good Food, Secure Late Breeding, To Secure and Maintain the Proper Temperature, Box for Packing, Chaff Hives, Rules for their Use, Wintering in Bee-House, Wintering in Cellar, Burying Bees or Clamps, Spring Dwindling. CHAPTER XIX.—p. 468. The House-Apiary and Bee-House. Bee-Houses. CHAPTER XX.—p. 473. Evils that Confront the Apiarist. Robbing, Disease, Foul Brood, Remedies, To Cure Bee-Paralysis, To Cure New Bee-Diseases, Ene- mies of Bees, The Bee-Moth, His- tory, Remedies, The Wee Bee-Moth, Remedies, Two Destructive Beetles, Robber-Flies, The Stinging Bug, The Bee-Stabber, Bee-Hawk, Tach- ina-Fly, Bee-Louse, Ants, Florida Ant, The Cow-Killer, The Praying Mantis, Blister-Beetles, Wasps, A Bee-Mite, Remedies, California Bee- Killer, Spiders, The King-Bird, The Toads, Mice, Shrews, Skunks. CHAPTER XXI.—p. 512. Calendar and Axioms, Work for Different Months, Jan- uary, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December, Axioms, Glossary. INTRODUCTION. WHO MAY KEEP BEES. SPECIALISTS. Any person who is cautious, observing and prompt, will succeed in bee-keeping. He must expect to work with full energy through the busy season, and persist though discour- agement and misfortune both confront him. I need not men- tion capital or location, for men of true metal—men whose energy of body and mind bespeak success in advance—will solve these questions long before their experience and knowl- edge warrant their assuming the charge of large apiaries. AMATEURS. Bee-keeping is specially to be recommended as an avoca- tion. Bees are of great value in fertilizing fruits, grains and vegetables; they also save millions of pounds of most whole- some food which would otherwise go to waste; and experience amply proves that they may be kept in city, village and coun- try at a good profit, and so any person, possessed of the proper ability, tact and energy, may adopt bee-keeping, and thus do good, gain pleasure, and often receive profit, as experience has shown, more than is derived from the regular occupation. The late Mr. C. F. Muth, of Cincinnati, long kept bees very profit- ably on his store, in the very heart of the city. Hundreds of our most successful bee-keepers live in small towns and vil- lages, and add bee-culture to their work in shop, office, or study, and receive health, pleasure, and money asa reward. Ladies all over our country are finding in this pursuit pleasure, and oppor- tunity to exercise in the pure air, which means health, and money. Farmers are adding bee-keeping to their farms, to find not infrequently that the bees are their most profitable property. Orchardists, especially, need and must have bees to pollinate the fruit-blossoms, and insure a crop. The time required willof course depend upon the number of colonies kept; but with wise management, this time may be given at 14 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; any time of the day or week, and thus not interfere with the regular business. Thus residents of country, village or city, male or female, who enjoy the society and study of natural objects, and wish to add to their income and pleasure, will find here an ever waiting opportunity. WHO SHOULD NOT KEEP BEES. There are occasionally persons to whom the venom of the bee isa serious poison. If such persons are stung anywhere their eyes swell so they can not see, the skin blotches, and serious irritation is felt over the entire body. Such persons are often overcome with fever for several days. and, though very rarely, thesting sometimes proves fatal. It goes without saying that such persons should not keep bees. It is a well known fact that the sting of the honey-bee becomes less and less poisonous the more one is stung. The system becomes inoculated against the poison. My own ex- perience proves this most conclusively. Every bee-keeper will receive occasional stings, but these become more and more rare, and soon occasion neither fear nor anxiety. INDUCEMENTS TO BEE-KEEPING. RECREATION. I name this first, as it was the pleasure in store that led me to the art of keeping bees, though I was terribly afraid of bees at the beginning. There is a rare fascination in the study of nature. Insect life is ever presenting the most pleasurable surprises to those who study it. Bees, from their wonderful instincts, curious structure and habits, and the interesting relations which they sustain to vegetable life, are most fasci- nating objects of study. The observant and appreciative bee- keeper is ever the witness of exhibitions that incite wonder and admiration. ‘This iswhy bee-keepers are always enthusi- asts. I know of no class of laborers who dwell more fondly on their work and business than do bee-keepers. A thorough study of the marvelous economy of the honey-bee must, from its very nature, bring delight and admiration. A farmer once said to me, ‘‘ Were it not for the generous profits of the busi- ness, I would still keep bees for the real pleasure I receive in OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 15 the business.”’ I once asked a hard worked teacher why he kept bees. I felt like saying amen to his answer: ‘‘ For the restful pleasure which the work gives.” I have often gone to the bees tired and nervous, and after an hour’s labor, felt re- freshed, as by sound sleep. I have been deeply gratified many times by the letters thanking me for having turned the writers’ attention towards bee-keeping. I often think that if a person does embark in bee-keeping, commencing in a small way—and no person should begin in any other way—the knowledge gained and consequent pleasure received will prove ample remunera- tion, even should no practical results follow. The man is broadened by the study, and better fitted to enjoy life. Some years since my old friend and college classmate, O. Clute, visited me. Of course, I must show him the bees. He was delighted, took this ‘‘ Manual’’ home with him, purchased some bees at once, and became enraptured with the work, and the result of all this was another first-class bee-keeper and that most fascinating work of fiction, ‘‘ Blessed Bees.”’ ; PROFITS. The profits in bee-keeping offer strong inducements towards its adoption asa pursuit. I believe few manual-labor occupa- tions offer so large returns, if we consider the capital invested. True, bee-keeping requires hard work, but this is only fora portion of the year, and in winter there is almost no work, especially if the bee-keeper buys all his hives, sections, etc., which is usually wiser than to make them. The cautious, prompt and skillful bee-keeper will often be able to securean annual average of seventy-five pounds per colony, besides doubling the number of his colonies. This will give $10.00 per colony at least, which is almost as much as the colony, with required apparatus, is worth. Of course, poor years will con- front the bee-keeper. Winter losses will be experienced by the beginner. Some will fail entirely. The fickle, careless, indo- lent man will as surely fail in bee-keeping as in any other calling. Yetif one studies the science and art, and commences bee-keeping in a small way, as all should, he will be no great loser, even if he find that he is not suited to the business. He knows more and isa broader man for this study and experi- ence. My brother, whois a good farmer, with a fertile and 16 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; well-stocked farm, commenced bee-keeping more to interest his boys than aught else. He has met very little loss in win- tering—for years together none at all. For three successive years his sixty colonies of bees gave him more profits than all the balance of his farm. As he saidat one of the Michigan State Conventions: ‘‘I find my bees the pleasantest and most profitable part of my farm.’’ He added the surprising remark, “Nothing on my farm bears neglect better than my bees.”’ I might add that neglect is rarely seen on his farm. Adam Grimm, James Heddon, G. M. Doolittle, E. J. Oat- man,and many others, have made much money in this pursuit. Mr. Hetherington keeps thousands of colonies-of bees, and has received over $10,000 cash receipts in a single year. Mr. Clute, an able clergyman, has often received more money from his bees than from his salary as a preacher. All over our country men are gaining a livelihood in this industry, and often earn- ing as much more in other pursuits. The opportunity to make money, even with hardships and privations, is attractive and seldom disregarded. What shall we say then of this oppor- tunity, if the labor which it involves, bririgs in itself healthful recreation and constant delight? Dr. C. C. Miller gaveupa $2500 salary to engage in bee-keeping. Though a specialist, and though his profits some. years, owing to the drouth, are nothing, yet he is contented with the business, and has no idea of changing for any other. EXCEKLLENCE AS AN AMATEUR PURSUIT. After twenty years of experience, I am persuaded that no business offers more as an avocation. Indeed, I think bee- keeping may ofttimes best serve asa second business. We have already seen that bees are a blessing, and I would have every person, whatever his leading business, keep a few colo- nies of bees, unless by taste, nature or temperament, he be unfitted for the work. Bee-keeping offers additional funds to the poorly paid; outdoor air to clerk and office-hand ; healthful exercise to the person of sedentary habits, opportunity for the poor to reap what would otherwise go to waste, and superior recreation to the student, teacher and professional man, espe- cially to him whose life-work is of that dull, hum-drum, rou- tine order that seems to rob life of all zest. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 17 The labor required in bee-keeping, especially if but few colonies are kept, can, with thought and management, be so arranged as not to infringe upon the time demanded by the regular occupation. Even the farmer, by wise foresight, can arrange so that his bees will not interfere greatly with his regular farm work. I have never received more hearty thanks than from persons whom I had influenced to add the care of bees to their other duties. ADAPTATION TO WOMEN. Apiculture may also bring succor to those whom society has not been over-ready to favor—our women. Widowed mothers, dependent girls, the weak and the feeble, all may find a blessing in the easy, pleasant and profitable labors of the apiary. Ofcourse, women who lack vigor and health can care for but very few colonies, and must have sufficient strength to bend over and lift the small-sized frames of comb when loaded with honey, and to carry empty hives. With the proper thought and management, full colonies need never be lifted, nor work done in the hot sunshine. Yet, right here let me add, and emphasize the truth, ¢hat only those who will let ener- getic thought and skillful plan, and above all promptitude and persistence, make up for physical weakness, should enlist as apiarists. Usually a stronger body and. improved health, the result of pure air, sunshine and exercise, will make each suc- cessive day’s labor more easy, and will permit a corresponding growth in the size of the apiary for each successive season. One of the most noted apiarists, not only in America, but in the world, sought in bee-keeping her health, and found not only health, but reputation andinfluence. Some of the most successful apiarists in our country are women. Of these, many were led to adopt the pursuit because of waning health, grasping at this as the last and successful weapon with which to vanquish the grim monster. That able apiarist, and terse writer on apiculture, Mrs. L. Harrison, states that the physicians told her that she could not live; but apiculture did for her what the physicians could not do-—restored her to health, and gave her such vigor that she has been able to work a large apiary for years. Said ‘‘Cyula Linswik ’’—whose excellent and beautifully 18 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; written articles have so often charmed the readers of the bee- journals, and who has had many years of successful experi- ence as an apiarist—in a paper read before the Michigan con- vention in March, 1887: ‘‘I would gladly purchase exemption from indoor work, on washing-day, by two days’ labor among , the bees, and I find two hours’ labor at the ironing-table more fatiguing than two hours of the severest toil the apiary can exact.’? I repeat, that apiculture offers to many women not only pleasure but profit Mrs. lL. B. Baker, of Lansing, Mich., who had kept bees very successfully for four years, read an admirable paper be- fore the same convention, in which she said: ‘‘ But I can say, having tried both (keeping boarding-house and apiculture), I give bee-keeping the preference, as more profitable, healthful, independent and enjoyable. * * * I find the labors of the apiary more endurable than working over a cook-stove indoors, and more pleasant and conducive to health, * * * IT be- lieve that many of our delicate and invalid ladies would find renewed vigor of body and mind in the labors and recreations of the apiary. * * * By beginning in the early spring, when the weather was cool and the work light, I became grad- ually accustomed to outdoor labor, and by midsummer found myself as well able to endure the heat of the sun as my hus- band, who has been accustomed to it all his life. Previously, to attend an open-air picnic was to return with a headache. * % * My own experience in the apiary has been a source of interest and enjoyment far exceeding my anticipations.” Although Mrs. Baker commenced with but two colonies of bees, her net profits the first season were over $100; the second year but a few cents less than $300 ; and the third year about $250. ‘‘The proof of the pudding is in the eating ;” and such words as those above show that apiculture offers special in- ducements to our sisters to become either amateur or profes- sional apiarists. At the present time almost every State has women bee-keepers, whose success has won attention. True it is, that in neatness and delicacy of manipulation, the women far surpass the men. The nicest honey producedin Michigan, year after year, comes from the apiary of two ladies whol believe are peers of any bee-keepers in our country. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 19 IMPROVES THE MIND, THE OBSERVATION, AND THER HEART. Successful apiculture demands close and accurate obser- vation, and hard, continuous thought and study, and this, too, in the wondrous realm of nature. In all this, the apiarist re- ceives manifold and substantial advantages. In the cultiva- tion of the habit of observation a person becomes constantly more able, useful and susceptible to pleasure—results which also follow as surely on the habit of thought and study. It is hardly conceivable that the wide-awake apiarist who is so frequently busy with his wonder-working comrades of the hive, can ever be lonely, or feel time hanging heavily on his hands. The mind is occupied, and there is no chance for ennui, The whole tendency of such thought and study, where nature is the subject, is to refine the taste, elevate the desires, and ennoble manhood. Once get our youth, with their sus- ceptibie natures, engaged in such wholesome study, and we shall have less reason to fear the vicious tendencies of the street, or the luring vices and damning influences of the saloon. Thus apiculture spreads an intellectual feast that even the old philosophers would have coveted; furnishes the rarest food for the observing faculties, and, best of all, by keeping its votaries face to face with the matchless creations of the All Father, must draw them toward Him ‘‘ who went about doing good,”’ and ‘‘in whom there was no guile.” YIELDS DELICIOUS FOOD. A last inducement of apiculture, certainly not unworthy of mention, is the offering it brings to ourtables. Health, yea our very lives, demands that we eat sweets. It is a truth that our sugars, and especially our commiercial syrups, are so adul- terated as to be often poisonous. The apiary in lieu of these, gives us one of the most delicious and wholesome of sweets, which has received merited praise, as food fit forthe gods, from the most ancient time to the present day. Ever to have within reach the beautiful, immaculate comb, or the equally grateful nectar, right from the extractor, is certainly a bless- ing of no mean order. We may thus supply our families and friends with a food element, with no cloud of fear from vile, poisonous adulterations. We now know that if we eat cane, 20 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; sugar—the common sugar of our tables—it is converted by the digestive fluids into a glucose-like sugar, which is probably nearly or quite identical with honey-sugar. The bees do the same with the nectar, which is dilute cane-sugar, of flowers. Thus we may reason that honey is our most wholesome sugar, for here the bees have in part digested our food for us. BRINGS THE SECOND BLADE OF GRASS. We now know that bees do most valuable work in pollina- ting the fruit-blossoms. No orchard will give full fruitage without the visits of nectar-loving insects. Of these valued friends, no other is at all comparable to the honey-bee, in the value of its service. I know of California orchards whose productiveness has been immensely increased by the introduc- tion of an apiary. Hjvery orchard should have an apiary in its near vicinity. ADDS TO THE NATION’S WEALTH. An excellent authority placed the number of colonies of bees in the United States, in 1881, at 3,000,000, and the honey- production for that year at more than 20,000,000 pounds. The production for that year was not up to the average, and yet the cash value of the year’s honey crop exceeded $30,000,000. We may safely add as much more as the value of the increase of colonies, and we havea grand total of $60,000,000—nearly enough to pay the intérest on the national debt, were the bonds all refunded. Mr. Root, in his excellent ‘‘ A BCof Bee-Cul- ture,’’? estimates, from sections sold, that 125 million pounds of honey are produced annually and sold for $10,000,000. And yet allthis is but gathered nectar, which would go to waste were it not for the apiarist and his bees. We thus save tothe country that which would otherwise be a total loss. Apicul- ture, then, in adding so immensely to the productive capital of the country, is worthy, as an art, to receive the encouragement and fostering care of the State. And the thought that he is performing substantial service to the State, may well add to the pleasureof the apiarist, as he performs his daily round of labor. When we add to this the vastly greater indirect benefit which comes through the agency of bees in fertilizing flowers —a benefit which can hardly be computed—we then understand OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 21 the immense value which comes from bees. Truly, the bee- keeper may feel proud of the grand part which his bees per- form in the economy of that part of nature which most con- cerns man and most generously ministers to man’s wants. WHAT SUCCESSFUL BEE-KEEPING REQUIRES. MENTAL EFFORT. No one should commence this business who is not willing to read, think, and study. To be sure, the ignorant and un- thinking may stumble on success for a time, but sooner or later failure will set her seal upon their efforts. Those of our apiarists who have studied the hardest, observed the closest, and thought the deepest, have even passed the late terrible winter with but slight loss. Those who fail, often fail because of just this lack of mental preparation. Of course the novice will ask, ‘‘How and what shall I study ?” EXPERIENCK NECHSSARY. Nothing will take the place of realexperience. Commence with a few colonies, even one or two is best, and make the bees your companions at every possible opportunity. Note every change, whether of the bees, their development, or work, and then by earnest thought strive to divine the cause. LEARN FROM OTHERS. Great good will also come from visiting and even working for a time with other bee-keepers. Note their methods, hives, sections, etc. Strive by conversation to gain new and valuable ideas, and gratefully adopt whatever is found, by comparison, to be an improvement upon your own past system and practice. AID FROM CONVENTIONS. Attend conventions whenever distance and means render this possible. Here you will not only be made better by social intercourse with those whose occupation and study make them sympathetic and congenial, byt you will find a real conserva- tory of scientific truths, valuable hints, and improved instru- ments and methods. And the apt attention—rendered possi- 22 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; ble by your own experience—which you wil! give to essays, discussions, and private conversations, will so enrich your mind that you will return to your home encouraged and able to do better work, and to achieve higher success. I have attended nearly all the meetings of the Michigan Bee-Keepers’ Association, many of those of Califernia, and several of the meetings of the National Bee-Keepers’ Association, and never yet when I was not well paid for all trouble and expense by the many, often very valuable, suggestions which I received. AID FROM BEE-PERIODICALS. Every apiarist should take and read at least one of the many excellent bee-periodicals that are issued in our country. It has been suggested that Francis Huber’s blindness was an advantage to him, as he thus had the assistance of two pairs of eyes, his wife’s and servant’s, instead of one. So, too, of the apiarist who reads the bee-publications. He has the aid of the eyes, and the brains, of hundreds of intelligent and observ- ing bee-keepers. Who is it that squanders his money on worse than useless patents and fixtures? He who ‘‘can not afford”’ to take a bee-paper. It would be invidious and uncalled for to recommend any one of these valuable papers to the exclusion of the others. Each has its peculiar excellencies, and all who can may well call to his aid two or more of them. AMERICAN BER JOURNAL.—This is the oldest American bee-paper, and the only weekly journal devoted exclusively to bee-keeping in the United States. It was founded in 1861, by the late Samuel Wagner, whose breadth of culture, strength of judgment, and practical and historical knowledge of bee- keeping, were remarkable. Even to-day those early volumes of this paper are very valuable parts of any bee-keeper’s library. Under the able management of Mr. Thomas G. Newman, the late editor, the paper made great and continuous advancement. The contributors to the ‘‘American Bee Journal’’ are the suc- cessful bee-keepers of America, and so it has a wide influ- ence. It is now edited by George W. York, whose skill, enter- prise, and ability, are no whit behind those who founded and raised this journal to its present proud place. ‘The publishers OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 23 are George W. York & Co., 334 Dearborn St., Chicago, Ill. Subscription price, $1.00 a year. GLEANINGS IN BEE-CULTURE.—This semi-monthly journal, which has just completed its 28th volume, has shown great vigor and energy from its very birth. Its editor is an active apiarist, who is constantly experimenting ; a terse, able writer, and brimful of good-nature and enthusiasm. I am free to say that in practical apiculture Iam more indebted to Mr. A.I. Root than to any other one person, except Rev. L. L. Lang- stroth. I also think that, with few exceptions, he has done more for the recent advancement of practical apiculture than any other person in our country or the world. This sprightly and beautifully illustrated journal is edited by E. R. Root, Me- dina, Ohio. Price, $1.00 a year. CANADIAN BEE JOURNAL.—This excellent periodical, though published across the line, is worthy of high praise and patronage. Mr. D. A. Jones wasits founder, and his ability, enterprise, and long and successful experience gave this paper great prestige. Perhaps no bee-keeper in the world has sacri- ficed more in the way of time and money, and received less for it, than has Mr. Jones, This is a monthly journal, and is pub- lished by the Goold, Shapley & Muir Co., Ltd., Brantford, Ont., at $1.00 a year. W.J. Craig is its editor. BEE-KEEPERS’ REVIEW.—Although the Bee-Keepers’ Re- view has less of years, it is already away up to the front, and an indispensable adjunct to every live apiarist. Its success has been quite phenomenal. The ability, energy, and success- ful experience of the editor, both as a writer and as a bee- keeper, fit him most admirably for his work. Not only has he won success in all departments of bee-keeping, but he has long been esteemed as one of the most able of our American apicul- tural writers. Published by W. Z. Hutchinson, Flint, Mich., at $1.00 a year. AMERICAN BEE-KEEPER.—The ability, enterprise and long and successful experience of Harry E. Hill, editor of this paper, are all well-known. It is a 20-page monthly magazine, neatly edited and wellillustrated. It is published by W, T, Falconer Mfg. Co., Jamestown, N. Y., at 50 cents a year, 24 BEE-KEHPER’S GUIDE; PROGRESSIVE BRE-KEERPER.—This is one of the later bee- papers, but it shows wonderful progress and great promise of usefulness. Its present editor, R. B. Leahy, is noted for his ability, enterprise, and pushing business ways. It is published monthly by Leahy Mfg. Co., Higginsville,Mo. Price, 50 cents a year. Rocky Mountain BgeEH JouRNAL.—This latest journal is edited by H. C. Morehouse, and is published monthly by him at Boulder, Colo. It shows vigor, and gives promise of long life and great usefulness. Its locality is very fortunate. Price, $1.00 a year. BOOKS FOR THE APIARIST. Having read many of the books treating of apiculture, American and foreign, Ican freely recommend such a course to others. Each book has peculiar excellencies, and may be read with interest and profit. LANGSTROTH ON THE HonEY-BuE.—This treatise will ever remain a classic in bee-literature. I can not over-estimate the benefits which I have received from a study of its pages. The style of this workis so admirable, the subject-matter so replete with interest, and the entire book so entertaining, that itisa desirable addition to any library, and no thoughtful, studious apiarist can well be without it. Itis especially happy in detail- ing the work of experimentation, and in showing with what caution the true scientist establishes principles or deduces con- clusions. ‘The work is wonderfully free from errors, and had the science and practice of apiculture remained stationary, there would have been little need of another work. Weare happy to state, however, that this work is now revised by no less able authorities than Chas, Dadant & Son, which places it high among our bee-books of to-day. Price, $1.20. A BC oF BEE-CULTURE.—This work is by the editors of “Gleanings in Bee-Culture.’’ Itis arranged in the convenient form of our cyclopedias, is printed in fine style, on beautiful paper, and is very fully illustrated. I need hardly say that the styleis pleasing and vigorous. The subject matter is fresh, and embodies the most recent discoveries and inventions per- taining to bee-keeping. Price, $1.20. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 25 Forty YEARS AMONG THE BgES.—This book is written by Dr. C. C. Miller, of Marengo, Ill., who is an authority on practical bee-keeping. It contains 328 pages, with 112 beauti- ful, original illustrations, taken by the author himself. It shows in minutest detail just how Dr. Miller does things with bees and makes a great success with them. Price, $1 00. ScIENTIFIC QUHEN-REARING.—This work is by that well- known and thoroughly practical bee-keeper, G. M. Doolittle. It is invaluable, treating, as it does, of a method by which the very best queen-bees are reared in accord with nature’s way. Price, $1.00. ADVANCED BExR-CULTURE.—This is a full and plain expla- nation of the successful methods practiced by the author, W. Z. Hutchinson. Price, 50 cents. : FOREIGN PUBLICATIONS. The British BEE JOURNAL, as the exponent of British methods and practices, is interesting and valuable to Ameri- can bee-keepers. It shows that in many things, as in the method of organizing and conducting conventions, so as to make them highly conducive to apicultural progress, we have much to learn from our brothers in Britain. The editor is one of the best informed bee-keepersof the world. The best way for Americans so secure this journal is through the editors of our Amevican bee-papers. FOREIGN BOOKS. The best of these, indeed one of the best ever published, is Tae HoNEY-BEE, by Thomas W. Cowan, of London, Eng- land. Itis the recognized authority in Europe, as it may well be. Itis not only beautiful, but full, accurate, and scientific. Asa history of scientific discovery in relation to bees, it is of special ‘interest. It deserves a place in every bee-keeper’s library. Price, $1.00. A more’ pretentious book is BEES AND BEE-KEEPING, by Frank Cheshire. In workmanship and illustration it is most admirable. It is a compilation from Schiemenz, Girard, Wollf, 26 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; and others. Many of the pages and many of the finest illus- trations are taken bodily, and, we are pained to say, with no credit. As we should expect, the work is not as reliable as the smaller work of Mr. Cowan. Price, $5.50. As practical guides, I do not think the foreign works supe- rior to our own. Indeed, I think the beginner would profit most by studying our American books. The advanced bee- keeper will gain much in discipline and knowledge by a care- ful reading of the foreign works on bee-keeping. Foreign sci- entists, especially the Germans, are at the head, but no nation is quicker to discern the practical bearing and utilize the facts and discoveries in science than are Americans. The Germans had hardly shown how centrifugal force could be used to sepa- rate honey from the comb before the Americans had given us our beautiful extractors. The sameis true of comb-foundation machines, The Germans pointed out the true nature of ‘ foul brood,’’ and discovered the germicides forits cure, yet I believe tén times as many Americans as foreigners profit by this knowledge. PROMPTITUDE. Another absolute requirement of successful bee-keeping is prompt attention to all its varied duties. Neglect is the rock on which many bee-keepers, especially farmers, find too often they have wrecked their success. I have no doubt that more colonies die from starvation than from all the bee-maladies known to the bee-keeper. And why is this? Neglect is the apicide. I feel sure that the loss each season by absconding colonies is almost incalculable, and what must we blame? Neglect. The loss every summer by enforced idleness of queen and workers, just because room is denied them, is very great. Who is the guilty party? Plainly, Neglect. If we would be successful, Promptitude must be our motto. Each colony of bees requires but very little care and attention. Our every interest requires that this be not denied, nor even granted grudgingly. The very fact that this attention is slight, renders it more liable to be neglected; but this neglect always involves loss—often disaster. True, with thought and management the time for this care can be arranged at pleasure and the amount greatly lessened, but the care must never be neglected, OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 27 ENTHUSIASM. Enthusiasm, or an ardent love of its duties, is a very desir- akle, if not an absolute, requisite to successful apiculture. To be sure, this is a quality whose growth, with only slight oppor- tunity, is almost sure. It only demands perseverance. The beginner, without-either experience or knowledge, may meet with discouragements—unquestionably will. Swarms will be lost, colonies will fail to winter, and the young apiarist will become nervous, which fact will be noted by the bees with great disfavor, and, if opportunity permits, will meet reproof more sharp than pleasant. Yet, with PERSISTENCH, all these difficulties quickly vanish. Ejvery contingency will be fore- seen and provided against, and the myriad of little workers will become as manageable and may be fondled as safely asa pet dog or cat, and the apiarist will minister to their needs with the same fearlessness and self-possession that he does to his gentlest cow or favorite horse. Persistence, in the face of all these discouragements which are so sure to confront inea- perience, will surely triumph. In sooth, he who appreciates the beautiful and marvelous, will soon grow to love his com- panions of the hive, and the labor attendant upon their care andmanagement. Nor will this love abate until if has been kindled into enthusiasm. ' True, there may be successful apiarists who are impelled by no warmth of feeling, whose superior intelligence, system and promptitude, stand in lieu of, and make amends for, absence of enthusiasm. Yet I believe such are rare, and certainly they work at great disadvantage. PART FIRST. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE HONEY- BEE. Natural History of the Honey-Bee, CHAPTER L THE BEE’S PLACE IN THE ANIMAL KINGDOM. It is estimated by eminent naturalists that there are more than 1,000,000 species of living animals. It will be both inter- esting and profitable to look in upon this vast host, that we may know the position and relationship of the bee to all this mighty concourse of life. BRANCH OF THE HONEY-BEE. The great French naturalist, Cuvier, a cotemporary of Napoleon I, grouped all animals which exhibit a ring struc- ture into one branch, appropriately named Articulates, as this term indicates the jointed or articulated structure whicl so obviously characterizes most of the members of this group. The terms ‘‘joint’’ and ‘“‘articulation,’’ as used here, have atechnical meaning. ‘They refer not to the hinge or place of union of two parts, but to the parts themselves. Thus, the parts of an insect’s legs are styled ‘* joints’ or ‘‘ articulations.” Allapiarists who have examined carefully the structure of a bee, will at once pronounce it an Articulate. Not only is its bedy, even from head to sting, composed of joints, but by close inspection we find the legs, the antennz, and even the mouth- parts, likewise jointed. The worms, too, are Articulates, though in some of these, as the leech, the joints are very obscure. The bee, then, which gives us food, is distantly related to the dreaded tape-worm, with its hundreds of joints, which, mayhaps, robs us of the same food after we have eatenit; and to the terrible pork- worm, or trichina, which may consume the very muscles we have developed in caring for our pets of the apiary. In classifying animals, the zoologist has regard not only to the morphology—the gross anatomy—but also to the em- 32 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; bryology, or style of development before birth or hatching. On both embryological and morphological grounds, Huxley and other recent authors are more than warranted in separa- ting the Vermes, or worms, from the Articulates of Cuvier asa separate phylum. The remaining classes are now included in the branch Arthropoda. This term, which means jointed feet, is most appropriate, as all of the insects and their allies have jointed feet, while the worms are without such members. The body-rings of these animals form a skeleton, firm, as in the bee and lobster, or more or less soft, as in most larve. The hardness of the crust is due to the deposit within it of a hard substance called chitine, and the firmness of the in- sect’s body varies simply with the amount of this chitine. This skeleton, unlike that of Vertebrates, or back-bone ani- mals, to which man belongs, is outside, and thus serves to pro- tect the inner. softer parts, as wellas to give them attach- ment, and to give strength and solidity to the animal. This ring structure, so beautifully marked in our golden- banded Italians, usually makes it easy to separate, at sight, animals of this branch from the Vertebrates, with their usually bony skeleton ; from the less active Molluscan branch, with their soft, sack-like bodies, familiar to us in the snail, the clam, the oyster, and the wonderful cuttle-fish—the devil-fish of Victor Hugo—with its long, clammy arms, strange ink-bag, and often prodigious size; from the branch Echinodermata, with its graceful star-fish and sea-stars, and elegant sea-lilies ; from the Coelenterata with its delicate but gaudy jelly-fish, and coral animals, the tiny architects of islands and even conti- nents; from the lowly Porifera or sponges which seem so little like an animal; and from the lowest, simplest, Protozoan branch, which includes animals often so minute that we often owe our very knowledge of them to the microscope, and so simple that they have been regarded as the bond which unites plants with animals. CLASS OF THE HONEY-BEE. The honey-bee belongs to the class Hexapoda, or true in- sects. The first term is appropriate, as all have in the imago, or last stage, six legs. Nor isthe second term less applicable, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 33 as the word ‘‘insect’’ comes from the Latin, and means to cut in, and in no other Arthropod does the ring-structure ap- pear so marked upon merely a superficial examination. More than this, the true insects when fully developed have, unlike all other Arthropods, three well-marked divisions of the body, Fic. 1. Respiratory Apparatus of Bee, magnifled—After Duncan. a Head, b Thorax, c Abdomen, d Antenne, e Compound Eyes, f Air-sacs, ggg’ Legs, f’ Tracher. (Fig. 1), namely: the head (Fig. 1, a), which contains the an- tenne (Fig. 1, d), the horn-like ‘appendages common to all insects; eyes (Fig. 1, e), and mouth organs; the thorax (Fig. 1,b), which bears the legs (Fig. 1, g), and wings, when they are present; and lastly, the abdomen (Fig. 1, c), which, though 34 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE}; ° usually without appendages, contains the ovipositor, and, when present, the sting. Insects undergo a more striking metamorphosis than do most other animals. When first hatched they are worm-like, and called ‘‘larve”’ (Fig. 39, /), which means masked; afterward they are frequently quies- cent, and would hardly be supposed to be animals at all. They are then known as pupa (Fig. 39, g). At last there comes forth the mature insect or imago (Fig. 1), with compound eyes, antenne and wings. In some insects the transformations are said to be incomplete, that is, thelarva, pupa, andimago differ little except in size, and that the latter possesses wings. The larve and pupz of such insects are knownasnymphs. We see in our bugs, lice, locusts and grasshoppers, illustrations of insects with incomplete transformations. In such cases there is a marked resemblance from the newly-hatched larva to the adult. The other classes of the phylum Arthropoda, are the Crus- tacea, Myriapoda, and Arachnoidea. The Crustaceans include the jolly cray-fish and the lobster, so indifferent as to whether they move forward, backward or sidewise ; the shorter crab, the sow-bug, lively and plump, even in its dark, damp home under old boards ; and the barnacles, which fasten to the bottom of ships, so that vessels are often freighted with life, without, as well as within. The myropods are the so-called ‘‘Thousand-Legged Worms.”’ These are wormlike in form. The body is hardly differentiated at all. The name comes from the numerous legs, which though never a thousand may reach one-fourth that number. Myriapods have only simple eyes, and all haveantennz. Of the Myriapoda the Millipeds have numerous segments, often as many as sixty, have four legs to each joint, are cylindrical, and are often pests in the garden, as they are vegetable eaters, The Centipeds have fewer joints, may be no more than thirty, only one pair of legs to each segment, and feed on insects, etc. Their bite is venomous, and the bite of the larger ones may prove harmful even to man himself. The Class Arachnida includes the spider group. These animals all have, when mature, eight legs. They never have but two parts to the body, the head-thorax and abdomen. s OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY, 35 Their eyes are simple, and they are without antenna. The wee mites belong here. They have hardly any divisions to the body. The mouth-parts form a mere portico. When first hatched they haye only six legs. The so-called red spider (red mite), so destructive in the orchard, belongs here, as do also the sugar, cheese, flour, and chicken mites. The ticks are but colossal mites. Of these, the Texas Cattle Tick (Boophilus bovis) causes the Texas fever in cattle. The cause of the fever is a protozoan animal, Pyrosoma bigeminum. ‘This is in the blood of Texas cattle, but is harmless. Carried by the tick to other cattle, it brings disease and death. The scorpions are also Arachnids. One of these stings as does the bee, and the sting is often quite venomous. The whip scorpion of Florida is named from its caudal appendages. It is entirely harmless. The Datames, which I call the ‘‘ California bee- killer’? (Fig. 292), and which is described among the bee- enemies, belongs here. Grandfather Graybeard also belongs in the scorpion order. It is only useful in pointing the way to lost cows, etc. Its legs point every way. The spiders are the highest Arachnids. They differ from mites in possessing two well-marked divisions of the body, and in always having eight legs, and from the scorpions in never having the abdo- men jointed. Thespiders have a poisonous bite, but rarely inflict injury to. man. Their silk and spinning habits are -exceedingly interesting. Spiders are almost as marvelous in their life history as are the bees. Like the Datames, to be spoken of asa bee-enemy, spiders often kill our pets of the hive. ORDER OF THE HONEY-BEE. The honey-bee belongs to the order Hymenoptera (from two Greek words meaning membrane and wing), which also in- cludes the wasps, ants, ichneumon-flies, gall-flies, and saw- flies. This group contains insects which possess a tongue by which they may suck (Figs. 16 and 54), and strong jaws (Fig. 65) for biting. Thus, the bees can sip the honeyed sweets of flowers, and also gnaw away mutilated comb. They have, besides, four wings, and undergo complete transformations. There are among insects strange resemblances. Insects of one order will show a marked likeness to those of another, 36 THE BEH-KEEPHR’S GUIDE; This is known as mimicry, and sometimes is wonderfully striking between very distant groups. Darwin and Wallace have shown this to be a developed peculiarity, not always pos- sessed by the ancestors of the animal, and that it comes through the laws of variation and natural selection to serve the purpose of protection. Right here we havea fine illustra- tion of this mimicry. Just the other day I received, through Mr. A. I. Root, an insect which he and the person sending it to him supposed to be a bee, and he desired to know whether it was a malformed honey-bee, or some other species. This insect, though looking in a general way much like a bee, had only two wings, had no jaws, and its antenna were close to- gether in front, and mere stubs. In fact, it was no bee at all, but belonged to the order Diptera, or two-winged flies. I have received several similar insects, with like inquiries. Among Diptera there are several families, as the G¢stridz, or bot-flies, some of the Asilida, or robber-flies (Fig. 268), which are often fierceenemies of our bees, the Syrphida—a very useful fam- ily, as the larve or maggots often live on plant-lice—whose members are often seen sipping sweets from flowers, or trying to rob the honey from other bees—the one referred to above belonged to this family—and the Bombyliidw, which in color, form, and hairy covering, are strikingly like wild and domes- ticated bees. The maggots of some of these feed on the larve of various of our wild bees, and of course the mother fly must steal into the nests of the latter to lay her eggs. Soin these cases there is seeming evidence that the mimicry may serve to protect these fly-tramps as they stealin to pilfer the coveted sweets, or lay the fatal eggs. Possibly, too, they may havea protective scent, as they have been seen to enter a hive in safety, though a bumble-bee essaying todo the same found the way barricaded with myriad simitars, each with a poisoned tip. Some authors have placed Coleoptera, or beetles, as the highest of insects, others claim for Lepidoptera, or butter-flies and moths, a first place, while others, and with the best of reasons, claim for Hymenoptera the highest position. The larger brain, wondrous habits, and marvelous differentiation of mouth-organs, legs, etc., more than warrant placing them OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 37 at the head. The moth is admired for the glory of its coloring andelegance of its form, and the beetle for the luster and brilliancy of its elytra, or wing-covers; but these insects only revel in Nature’s wealth, and live and die without labor or pur- pose. Hymenoptera, usually less gaudy, often quite plain and unattractive in color, are yet the most highly endowed among insects. They live with a purpose in view, and are the best models of industry to be found among animals. Our bees practice a division of labor; the arfts are still better political economists, as they have a specially endowed class in the com- munity which are the soldiers, and thus are the defenders of each ant-kingdom. Ants also conquer other communities, take their inhabitants captive, and reduce them to abject slavery— requiring them to perform a large portion, and sometimes the whole, of the labor of the community. Ants-tunnel under streams, and in the tropics some leaf-eating species have been observed to show no mean order of intelligence, as some ascend trees to cut off the leafy twigs, while others remain below and carry these branches through their tunnels to their under- ground homes. Indeed, the Agricultural ant, of Texas, actually clears land and grows a special kind of plant on which it feeds. (See McCook’s Ants.) The parasitic Hymenoptera are so-called because they lay their eggs in other insects, that their offspring may have fresh meat not only at birth, but so long as they need food, as the insect fed upon generally lives till the young parasite, which is working to disembowel it, is full-grown; thus this steak is ever fresh as life itself. These parasitic insects show won- drous intelligence, or sense-development, in discovering their prey. I have caught ichneumon-flies—a family of these para- sites—boring through the bark and a thin layer of solid beech or maple wood, and upon examination I found the prospective victim further on in direct line with the insect auger, which was to intrude the fatalegg. Ihave also watched ichneumon- flies depositing eggs in leaf-rolling caterpillars, so surrounded with tough hickory leaves that the fly had to pierce several thicknesses to place the egg in its snugly-ensconced victim. Upon putting these leaf-rolling caterpillars in a box, I reared, of course, the ichneumon-fly and not the moth. Is it instinct 38 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; or reason that enables these flies to gauge the number of their eggs to the size of the larva which is to receive them, so that there may be no danger of famine and starvation? For true itis that while small caterpillars will receive but few eggs, large ones may receive several. Even the honey-bee some- times falls victim to such parasites, as I shall show in speak- ing of enemies of bees. How strange the habits of the saw- fly, with its wondrous instruments, more perfect than any saws of human workmanship, and the gall-flies, whose poison- ous stings, as they fasten their eggs to the oak, rose, or other leaves, cause the abnormal growth of food for the still un- hatched young. In the South it is reported that bees often obtain no small amount of nectar from species of oak-galls. The providing and caring for their young, which are at first helpless, is peculiar among insects, with slight exception, to the Hymenoptera, and among all animals is considered a mark of high rank. Such marvels of instinct, if we may not call it intelligence, such acumen of sense perception, such wonderful habits, all these, no less than the compact structure, small size and specialized organs of nicest finish, more than warrant that grand trio of American naturalists—Agassiz, Dana, and Packard—in placing Hymenoptera first in rank among insects. As we shall detail the structure and habits of the highest of the high—the bees—in the following pages, I am sure no one will think to degrade the rank of these wonders of the animal kingdom. FAMILY OF THE HONEY-BEE. The honey-bee belongs to the family Apide, of Leach, which includes not only the hive-bee, but all insects which feed their helpless larve on pollen, pollen or honey, or food digested by the adult bees. Many authors separate the lower bees, principally because of their shorter tongues, from the others, under the family name, Andrenide. In this case all the bees are grouped as Mellifera or Anthophila Latr. I shall group all beesin the one family Apidz, and regard the Andrene and their near relatives as asub-family. The insects of this family all have branched or plumose hairs on some portion of the body, broad OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 39 heads, elbowed antennz (Fig. 1, d), which are thirteen jointed in the males, and only twelve jointed in the females. The jaws or mandibles (Fig. 65) are strong and usually toothed. The tongue or ligula is very long andslim in the higher genera, but short and flattened in the lower ones. The second jaws or maxille (Fig. 54, m2) are long and prominent, and ensheath the tongue, with which they are folded back when not in use, once or more under the head. All the insects of this family have, on the four anterior legs, a stiff spine on the end of the tibia (Fig. 69), the fourth joint of the leg from the body—called the tibial spur, and all except the genus Apis, which includes the honey-bee, in which the posterior legs are without tibial spurs, have two tibial spurs on the posterior legs. Nearly all bees (the parasitic genera are exceptions) have the first joint of the tarsus of the posterior legs much broadened (Fig. 71), and this, together with the broad tibia, is hollowed out (Fig. 70), forming quite a basin or basket—the corbicula—on the outer side, in the species of Apis and Bom- bus, which basket is deepened by long, stiff hairs. These re- ceptacles, or pollen-baskets, are found only in such bees as gather much pollen. A few of the Apidz—thieves by nature— cuckoo-like, steal unbidden into the nests of others, and here lay their eggs. As their young are fed and fostered by another, such bees gather no pollen, and so, like drone-bees, need noorgans for collecting it. These parasites illustrate mimicry, already described, as they look so like the foster- mothers of their own young that unscientific eyes would often fail to distinguish them. Probably the bees thus imposed upon are no sharper, or they would refuse ingress to these merciless vagrants. The larve (Fig. 39,7) of all insects of this family are maggot-like, wrinkled, footless, tapering at both ends, and, as already stated, have their food prepared for them. They are helpless, and thus all during their babyhood (the larva state)— the time when all insects are most ravenous, and the only time when many insects take food; the time when all growth in size, except such enlargement as is required by egg-development, occurs—these infant bees have to be fed by their mothers or elder sisters. They have a mouth with soft lips, and weak 40 THE BREE-KEEPER’S GUIDE ; jaws, yet it is doubtful if all or much of their food is taken in at this opening. There is much reason to believe that the honey-bees especially, like many maggots—such as the Hes+ sian-fly larve—absorb much of their food through the body walls. From the mouth leads the alimentary canal, which has no analopening. So there are no excreta other than gas and vapor, except the small amount which remains in the stomach and intestine, which are shed with the skin at the time of the last molt. What commendation for their food, nearly all capable of nourishment, and thus assimilated ! To this family belongs the genus of stingless bees, Mel- ipona, of Mexico and South America, which store honey not only in the hexagonal brood-cells, but in great wax-reservoirs. They, like the unkept hive-bee, build in hollow logs. They are exceedingly numerous in each colony, and it has thus been thought that there was more than one queen. They are also very prodigal of wax, and thus may possess a prospective com- mercial importance in these days of comb foundation. In this genus the basal joint of the tarsus is triangular, and there are two submarginal cells, not three, to the front wings. They are also smaller than our common bees, and have wings that do not reach the tip of their abdomens. Mr. T. F. Bingham, inventor of the bee-smoker, bought a colony of the stingless bees from Mexico to Michigan. The climate seemed unfavor- able to them, as soon the bees all died. Inow have some of the bees, and their great black honey and pollen cells in our museum. The corbicule, or pollen-baskets, are specially well marked, and the posterior tibial spur is wanting in these small bees. Another genus of stingless bees, the genus Trigona, have the wings longer than the abdomens, and their jaws toothed. These, unlike the Melipona, are not confined to the New World, but are met with in Africa, India, and Australasia. These build their combs in tall trees, fastening them to the branches much as does the Apis dorsata, soon to be mentioned. Of course insects of the genus Bombus—our common bum- ble-bees—belong to this family. Here the tongue is very long, the bee large, and the sting curved, with the barbs very short and few. Only the queen survives the winter. In spring she OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 41 forms her nest under some sod or board, often ina deserted mouse-nest, hollowing out a basin in the earth, and after stor- ing a mass of bee-bread she deposits several eggs in the mass. The larve are soon hatched out and develop in large, coarse cells, not unlike the queen-cells of our hive-bees. When the bees issue from these cells the latter are strengthened with wax, Laterin the season, these coarse wax-cells, which con- tain much pollen, become very numerous, serving both for brood and honey. At first, in spring, the queen has all to do, hence the magnificent bumble-bees, the queens, seen about the lilacs in early spring. Soon the smaller workers become abundant, and relieve the queen, which then seldom leaves the nest. Later, the drones and the smaller, because yet unim- pregnated and non-laying, queens appear. Thus, the bees correspond with those of the hive. The young queens mate in late summer, and are probably the only ones that survive the winter. Mating is performed on the wing. I once saw a queen Bombus fall to the earth, dragging a male from which she would have torn loose had I not captured both. The bum- ble-bee drones are often seen collected about shady places at the mating season in August. Bees of the genus Xylocopa much resemble bumble-bees, though they are usually black, less hairy, and are our largest bees. They have not the corbicule. These are among our finest examples of boring insects. With their strong biden- tate jaws they cut long tunnels, often twoor more feet long, in sound wood. These burrows are partitioned by chips into cells, andin each cell is left an egg and bee-bread for the larva, soon to hatch. These bees do no slight damage by boring into cornices, window-casings, etc., of houses and out- buildings. At my suggestion, many people thus annoyed have plugged these tunnels with a mixture of lard and kero- sene, and have speedily driven the offending beesaway. These are the bees which I have discovered piercing the base of long tubular flowers, like the wild bergamot. I have seen honey- bees visiting these slitted flowers, the nectar of which was thus made accessible to them. I have never seen honey-bees biting flowers. I think they never do it. Kylocopa Califor- nica is very common here at Claremont. The females are 42 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; black, and the males light yellow. My students told me the females would not sting. I said that was strange, and picked oneup. I threw it down very quickly, and have not repeated the experiment. The mason-bees—well named—construct cells of earth, which, by aid of their spittle, they cement so that these cells are very hard. There are several genera of these bees, the elegant Osmia, the brilliant Augochlora, the more sober but very numerous Andrena—the little black bees that often steal into the hives for honey, etc. Some burrow in sand, some build in hollowed-out weeds, some build mud cells in crevices, even small key-holes not being exempt, as I have too good reason to know. The Yale locks in our museum have thus suffered. Here the lard and kerosene mixture again comes in play. The tailor, or leaf-cutting, bees, of the genus Megachile, make wonderful cells from variously shaped pieces of leaves. These are always mathematical in form, usually circular and oblong, are cut—the insect making scissors of its jaws—from various leaves, the rose being a favorite. I have found these cells made almost wholly of the petals or flower-leaves of the rose. Thecells are made by gluing these leaf-sections in con- centric layers, letting them overlap. The oblong sections form the walls of the cylinder, while the circular pieces are crowded into the tubes as we press circular wads into our shot-guns, and are used at the ends, or for partitions where several cells are placed together. When complete, the single cells are in form and size much like a revolver cartridge. When several are placed together, which is usually the case, they are arranged end to end, and in size and form are quite like a small stick of candy, though not more than one-third as long. These cells I have found in the grass, partially buried in the earth, in crevices, and in one case knew of their being built in the folds of a partially-knit sock, which a good house-wife had chanced to leave stationary for somie days. These leaf-cutters often have yellow hairs underneath their bodies, which aid them in carrying pollen. I have noticed them each summer, for some years, swarming on the Virginia creeper, often called woodbine, while in blossom, in quest of pollen, though I have OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 43 rarely seen the hive-bee on these vines. The tailor-bees often cut the foliage of the same vines quite badly. The males of these bees have curiously modified, and broadly fringed ante- rior legs. I have found these tailor-bees as common in Califor- nia as in Michigan. I have often reared beautiful bees of the genera Osmia and Augochlora, which, as already stated, are also called mason-bees. Their glistening colorsof blue and green possess aluster and reflection unsurpassed even by the metals them- selves. These rear their young in cells of mud, in mud-cells lining hollow weeds and shrubs, and in burrows which they dig in the hardearth. In early summer, during warm days, these glistening gems of life are frequently seen in walks and drives intent on gathering earth for mortar, or digging holes, and will hardly escape identification by the observing apiarist, as their form is so much like that of our honey-bees. They are smaller, yet their broad head, prominent eyes, and general form, are very like those of the equally quick and active, yet more soberly attired, workers of the apiary. The beautiful— often beautifully striped—species of Ceratina look much like those of Osmia, but they nest in hollows in stems of various plants, which, in some cases, they themselves form. In south- western Michigan they do no little harm by boring the black- berry canes. They have simple hind legs. Other bees—the numerous species of the genus Nomada, and of Apathus—are the black sheep in the family Apide. These tramps, already referred to, like the English cuckoo and our American cow-blackbird, steal in upon the unwary, and, though all unbidden, lay their eggs; in this way appropriating food and lodgings for theirown yetunborn. Thus these insect vagabonds impose upon the unsuspecting foster-mothers in their violated homes, and these same foster-mothers show by their tender care of these merciless intruders, that they are miserably fooled, for they carefully guard and feed infant bees, which, with age, will in turn practice this same nefarious trickery. The Apathus species are parasites on the Bombus; the Nomada species, which are small bees, often beautifully ringed, on the small black Andrene. The species of Andrena, Halictus, the red Sphecodes, and 44 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE}; others of the Andrenidz of some authors, have short, flat tongues, with equi-jointed labial palpi. These bees have been little studied, and there are very numerous undescribed species. Treluctantly withhold further particulars of this wonder- ful bee-family. When first I visited Messrs. Townley and Davis, of Michigan, Iwas struck with the fine collection of wild-bees which each had made. Yet, unknowingly, they had incorporated many that were not becs. Of course, many api- arists will wish to make such collections, and also to study our wild bees. I hope the above will prove both a stimulus and aid. I hope, too, that it will stimulate others, especially youth, to the valuable and intensely interesting study of these won- ders of nature. Iam glad to open to the readera page from the book of nature so replete with attractions as is the above. Nor do I think I have taken too much space in revealing the strange and marvelous instincts, and wonderfully varied habits, of this brightest of insect families, at the head of which stand our own fellow-laborers and companions of the apiary. I shall be very glad to receive specimens of wild bees from every State in our country. To send bees or other insects, kill with gasoline or chloroform, wrap with cotton or tissue paper, so as to prevent injury, and mailin a strong box. THE GENUS OF THE HONEY-BEE. The genus Apis includes all bees that have no tibial spurs on the posterior legs, and at the same time have three cubital or sub-costal cells (6, 7, 8, Fig. 2)—the second row from the costal or anterior edge—on the front or primary wings. The marginal cell (Fig. 2, 5) is very long. On the inner side of the posterior basal tarsus, opposite the pollen-baskets, in the neuters or workers, are rows of hairs (Fig. 71), which are used in collecting pollen. In the males, which do no work except to fertilize the queens, the large compound eyes meet above, crowding the simple eyes below (Fig. 3), while in the workers (Fig. 4) and queens these simple eyes (called ocelli) are above, and the compound eyes wide apart. The compound eyes are in all cases hairy (Figs. 3, 4). The drones and queens have weak jaws, with a rudimentary tooth (Fig. 65, @ 6), short OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 45 tongues, and no pollen-baskets, though they have the broad tibia and wide basal tarsus (Fig. 48, ¢, s). There is some doubt as to the number of species of this Fic. 2. Anterior and Posterior Wings of Bee.—Original. ht Hooklets much magnified. 1 Costal cell. a Costal vein. 2 Median cell. b Sub-costal vein. 3 Sub-median cell. c Median vein. 4 Anal cell. d Anal vein. 5 Marginal cell. q Posterior margin. 6, 7, 8, Sub-marginal cells. e Fold where how klets catch, 10, 1L and 12, Discoidal cells. A Hooklets. 46 THE BEE-KEEKPER’S GUIDE ; genus. It is certain that the Italian bee, the Egyptian bee, the Cyprian bee, and the bees of Syria, of which Mr. Benton states that there are at least two distinct races, are only races of the Apis mellifera, which also includes the Tunisian or Punic bees, the Carniolan, and the German or black bee. Mr. F. Smith, an able entomologist of England, considers Apis dorsata of India and the East Indies, Apis zonata of the Philippine Islands, Apis indica of India and China, and Apis Fic. 3. Head of Drone, magnified.— Original. Antenne, Compound Eyes, Simple Eyes. florea of India, Ceylon, China, and Borneo, as distinct species. He thinks, also, that Apis adonsoni and Apis nigrocincta are distinct, but states that they may be varieties of Apis indica. Others think them races of dorsata. Some regard Apis uni- color as a distinct species, but it is probably a variety of Apis mellifera. As Apis mellifera has not been found in India, and is a native of Europe, Western Asia, and Africa, it seems quite possible, though not probable, that several of the above may turn out to be only varieties of Apis mellifera. If there are only color and size to distinguish them, and, indeed, one may add habits, then we may suspect, with good reason, the validity of the above arrangement. If there be structural difference, as Mr. Wallace says there is, in the male dorsata, then we may call them different species. The Italian certainly has a longer tongue than the German, yet that is not sufficient OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 47 to separate them as species. Apis zonata of the Kast Indies, and Apis unicolor, are said to be very black. I append the following chart, which I think represents pretty accurately the species, races and varieties of the genus Apis. (See page 48.) Where a race is followed by an interrogation point, there is a question if it should not be considered a variety of the last preceding race not thus marked. Some of the races, like the Italian, Cyprian, Greek, etc., Vogel considers had their origin in across between the yellow and black races. Vogel’s con- clusion was reached from a long series of experiments, cross- ing Italian and German bees, and then breeding from such crosses. It seems likely that through the law of variation Head of Worker, magnified.—Original. Antenne, Compound Eyes, Simple Eyes. each race might have originated independently, or possibly all, as varieties of the Egyptian bee. In the autumn of 1879, Mr. D. A. Jones, of Beeton, Ontario, Canada, inaugurated the grandest enterprise ever undertaken in the interest of apiculture. This was nothing less than to visit Cyprus, Syria, and the more distant India and the Kast Indies, for the purpose of securing and introducing into Amer- ica such species and races of bees as gave promise of superior excellence. Mr. Jones procured the services of Mr. Frank 48 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; SPECIES. Races. VARIETIES. Apis Indica, Fab. A. dorsata nigripennis, Apis florea, Fab, Latr. ' Apis dorsata, Fab, A. dorsata bicolor, Klug. a sa ela ( Carniolan or Kraincr, * aang Heath. llungarian. A. mellifera nigra. German Bee Dalmatian. Herzegovinian. Smyrnian. Tunisian. A. mellifera fasciata, Common biacik: Evyptian Bee. Syrian (?) south Palestine (?) Apis mellifera, Cyprian (7) Italian (?) Greek (?) Bonnut (?) Caucasian (2) A. mellifera unicolor Latr. Madapasear. A. mellifera adonsoni, African Bee. \ Genton, a graduate of the Michigan Agricultural College, a fine linguist and skilled apiarist, to aid in his undertaking. After visiting the principal apiaries of Europe, these gentle- men located at Larnica, in the island of Cyprus, where they established a large apiary composed of Cyprian and Syrian bees. The Cyprian bees were purchased on the island, while the Syrians were procured personally by Mr. Jones in Syria. The following June Mr. Jones returned to America with sev- eral hundred queens of these two races. Mr. Benton remained at Larnica to rear and ship more queens to Europe and Amer- ica. The following winter Mr. Benton visited Ceylon, Farther India, and Java, as Mr. Jones was determined to ascertain if there were better bees than those we already had, and if so to secure them. Apis dorsata (Figs. 5, 6) was the special object of the quest, and as this bee was known as the * great bee of Java,” Mr. Benton visited that island, in hopes to procure these bees. But to the sore disappointment not only of those who had the enterprise in charge, but of all progressive api- arists, the bees in question were not to be found on that island. Mr. Benton learned ata great cost that this bee is rare in OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 49 Java, but common in the jungles of Ceylon, Hindoostan, Farther India, Sumatra, Borneo, and Timor. In Ceylon, Mir. Fic. 5, A, dorsata Worker, X2. (From Department of Agriculture.) Benton saw many colonies, most of which were in inaccessible places, though he secured, after great labor and hardship, four colonies. — A. dorsata Drone, X2. (From Department of Agriculture.) These bees usually suspend their great combs, which are often six feet long and four feet wide, to overhanging rocks, or 50 THE BEE-KEHEPER’S GUIDE; to horizontal branches of trees. In one case, Mr. Benton found them in the crevice of a rock, nearly surrounded by the same. This indicates that they may be kept in hives. The combs hang side by side, so do those of our common bees, but are one- half inchapart. Mr. Benton found the tops of the combs, which contain the honey, from three to six inches thick, while those where brood is reared, are one and one-half inches thick. Drones and workers are all reared in the same cells, which are about the size of the drone brood-cells of our honey-comb, The worker-bees, some specimens of which I have received from Fic. 7. Worker-Cells.—A. indica. (From Department of Agriculture.) Mr. Jones, in size and general appearance much resemble our Italian queens. They have blue-black wings, black bodies, which are ringed very much asare our Italians, only the yellow largely predominates. Mr. Benton writes me that in form and style of flight they much resemble wasps. They are the same size as the drones, varying from three-fourths to seven-eighths of an inch in length. They are easily handled by aid of smoke, and are very clumsy in their attempts to sting. Their sting is no larger than that of our common bees, while the pain from their sting, Mr. Benton says,is not so great. The drones are dark brown, marked with yellow. Strangely enough, they only fly, unless disturbed, after sundown. This is unfortunate, as with the same habits we might hope to mate them with our common bees, and thus procure a valuable cross. This may be a developed peculiarity, to protect them from birds, and so might very likely disappear with domesti- cation. The queens are leather-colored, and smaller, as com- pared with the workers, than are our common queens. The queens are more restless than are the workers while being OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 51 handled. While procuring these bees, Mr. Benton was pros- trated with a fever, and so the bees, during their long voyage to Syria, were neglected. Strange to say, one colony survived the long confinement, but perished soon after reaching Syria. Wecan not call this journey a failure, as we now have the information that will render a second attempt surely success- ful. What has been learned will make the enterprising bee- keeper more desirous than ever to secure these bees. Their large size, and immense capabilities in the way of wax-secre- tion, as well as honey-storing, give us reason to hope for sub- stantial benefits from their importation. Mr. Benton also found A. indica and A. florea on the Island of Ceylon. I have received some of the bees and comb of the former species. The comb is very delicate, the cells (Fig. 7) being only one-sixth of an inch in diameter. The workers are less than one-half of an inch long, brown in color, and their entire abdomens are beautifully ringed with brown and yellow. The drones are black, and very small. The one I have measures an eighth of an inch less in length than does the worker. The queens are leather-colored, and very large as compared with the workers. They are as large as are our Fic. 8. Worker-Cells.—A. Florea, (From Department of Agriculture.) common queens. These bees are very quick, and are domesti- cated on the Island of Ceylon. The workers of A. florea are also banded, and are more beautiful even than those of A. indica. ‘They are very small. The combs are not larger than one’s hand, and so diminutive are the cells (Fig. 8) that 100 52 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; bees are produced to the square inch. The color is blue-black, with the basal third of the abdomen orange. The sting of these two species is very small. From the small amount of stores which they gather, the tendency which they have to swarm out, and their inability to stand the cold, these two species promise little of value except from a scientific point of view. One colony of A. florea was brought by Mr. Benton to Cyprus, but it swarmed out and was lost. It seems strange that the genus Apis should not have been native to: the American continent. The “large brown bee” which some of our bee-keepers think native to America, is un- doubtedly but a variety of the common black, or German, bee. Without doubt there were no bees of this genus here till intro- duced by the Caucasian race. It seems more strange, as we tind that all the continents and islands of the Eastern Hemis- phere abound with representatives. It is one more illustration of the strange, inextricable puzzles connected with the geo- graphical distribution of animals. SPECIES OF OUR HONEY-BEES. The becs at present domesticated are all of one species— Apis mellifera. The character of this species will appear in the next chapter, as we proceed with their anatomy and physiology. As before stated, this species is native exclusively to the Eastern Hemisphere, though it has been introduced wherever civilized man has taken up his abode. RACES OF THE HONEY-BEE. German ov Black Bees. The German or black bee is the race best known, as through all the ages it has been most widely distributed. The name ‘““German’’ refers to locality, while the name ‘‘ black” isa misnomer, as the bee is a gray-black. The queen, and, ina less degree, the drones, are darker, while the legs and under. surface of the former are brown, or copper-colored, and of the latter light gray. The tongue of the black worker I have found, by repeated dissections and comparisons made both by myself and by my pupils, is shorter than that of the Italian OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 53 worker, and generally less hairy. The bees are more irritable, and so more likely to sting than the Italians. They are also wont to keep flying before one’s face in threatening mien for hours, until killed. The wise apiarist will dispatch such quar- relsome workers at once. The black bees have been known no longer than the Italians, as we find the latter were known both to Aristotle, the fourth century B. C., and to Virgil, the great Roman poet, who sang of the variegated golden bee, the first century B. C.; and we can only account for the wider dis- tribution of the German bee by considering the more vigorous, pushing habits of the Germanic races, who not only over-ran and infused life into Southern Europe, but have vitalized all christendom. Ligurian or Italian Bee. The Italian bee is characterized as a race, not only by dif- ference of color, habits, and activity, but also by possessing a little longer tongue. These bees were first described as dis- tinct from the German race by Spinola, in 1805, who gave the name ‘“‘ Ligurian ’”’ bee, which name prevails in Europe. The name comes from a province of Northern Italy, north of the Ligurian Gulf, or Gulf of Genoa. This region is shut off from Northern Europe by the Alps, and thus these bees were kept apart from the German bees, and in warmer, more genial Italy, was developed a distinct race—our beautiful Italians. It seems to me quite reasonable to suppose from the appearance of the bees, and also from the migrations of the human race, that the Italian bee is an off-shoot from the Cyprian, and quite likely both of these of the Syrian race. In 1843, Von Baldenstein procured a colony of these bees, which he had previously observed as peculiar, while stationed as a military captain in Italy. He published his experience in 1848, which was read by Dzierzon, who became interested, and through him the Italian became generally introduced into Germany. In 1859—six years after Dzierzon’s first importa- tion—the Italian bee was introduced into England by Neigh- bour. The same year, Messrs. Wagner and Colvin imported the Italians from Dzierzon’s apiary into America ; and in 1860, 54 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; Mr. S. B. Parsons brought the first colonies that were im- ported direct from Italy. The Italian worker-bee is quickly distinguished by the pright yellow rings at the base of the abdomen. Perhaps golden would be a better term, as these bands are often bright orange. If the colony be pure, every bee will show three of these golden girdles (Fig. 9, A, B. C). The first two segments Fia. 9 Abdomen of Italian Worker. (From A. I. Root Co.) or rings of the abdomen, except at their posterior border, and also the base or anterior border of the third, will be of this orange-yellow hue. The rest of the back or dorsal surface will be much asin the German race. Underneath the abdomen, except fora greater or less distance at the tip, will also be yellow, while the same color appears more or less strongly marked on the legs. The workers have longer ligule or tongues (Fig. 54) than the German race, permitting them to gather nectar from long flower-tubes, which is inaccessible to our common bees, and their tongues are also a little more hairy than are those of the black bees. They are also more active, and less inclined to sting. The queen has the entire base of her abdomen, and sometimes nearly the whole of it, orange-yellow. Thevariation as to amount of color is quite OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 55 striking. Sometimes very dark queens are imported right from the Ligurian hills, yet all the workers will wear the badge of purity—the three golden bands. The drones are quite variable. Sometimes the rings and patches of yellow will be very prominent, then, again, quite indistinct. But the under side of the body is always, so far as I have observed, mainly yellow. A variety of our Italian bees, which is very beautiful and gentle, has the rows of white hairs (Fig. 9,J, K, L, M) un- usually distinct, and is being sold in the United States under the name of Albinos. They are not a distinct race. In fact, I have often noticed among Italians the so-called Albinos sev- eral times, and have not found them superior, or even equal, I think, to the average Italian. THE SYRIAN AND CYPRIAN RACES. Through the enterprise of Messrs. D. A. Jones and Frank Benton, we now have these races in our country, and have proved the truth of the assertion of noted European apiarists, that the Cyprian is a distinct race of bees. Mr. Benton, than whom no one is better fitted to express a correct opinion, thinks that the Cyprian bees are the offspring -of the Syrian. This opinion is strengthened by the close re- semblance of the two races, and by the fact that migrations of all kinds have gone westward. A similar argument would make it presumable that the Cyprians gave rise to the Italians. The Cyprian bees resemble the Italians very closely. They may be distinguished by the bright leather-colored lunule which tips their thorax posteriorly,and by the fact that the under side of their bodies is yellow to the tip. They are more active than are the Italians, and the queens are more prolific. The good qualities of the Italians seem all to be exagger- ated in the Cyprians, except the trait of amiability. The Cyprian bees are second only tothe Egyptian in irritability. That they will become less cross with handling is to be ex- pected. The Syrian bees are from Asiatic Turkey, north of Mount Carmel, and area very well marked race. The Syrian queens are remarkably uniform. ‘Their abdomens above are, like the 56 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE}; little A. indica, beautifully banded with yellow and black. They are very quick and remarkably prolific. They do not cease laying even when the honey-flow ceases. They are often Fic. 10. Carniolan Queen.—X2. (From Department of Agriculture.) kept prisoners in the cells longer than are queens of other races, and so may fly out at once upon emerging. They Fic. 11. Carniolan Worker.—X2. (From Department of Agriculture.) emerge from the cells at about the same time, so that often ail the queens may emerge from the cells within a few hours, or even one hour. The workers closely resemble those of the OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 57 Italian race, only that they were more yellow beneath, and when first from the cells, or newly hatched, they are very dark, owing to the fact that the body-rings seemed pushed together. They are admirable in the way they defend their hives against robbers, the ease with which they are shaken from the combs, their great activity, their great tendency to remain in the hive on very windy days, the wonderful fecundity of the queen, her persistence in laying during a dearth of nec- tar-secretion, and their great euperiority for queen-rearing. Fic. 12. Carniolan Drone.— X2. (From Department of Agriculture.) often starting fifty or more good queen-cells. Neither the Cyprian nor Syrian has found favor in America, and have largely been given up. OTHER RACKS. The Egyptian bees are very yellow, intensely cross, and frequently have laying workers. These are probably the bees which are famous in history,as having been moved up and down the Nile, in rude boats or rafts, as the varying periods of nectar-secreting bloom seemed to demand. The heath bees of Northern Germany are much like the common German bees, of which they are a strain, except that they are far more inclined to swarm.° The Carniolan bees (Figs. 10, 11, 12) of Southwestern 58 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE ;° Austria, also called Krainer bees, from the mountainous re- gion of Krain, Austria, are praised as a very hardy variety. They are black with white rings—a sort of albino—German bee. They are like the heath variety, but are specially noted for their very gentle dispositions. Some European bee-keepers claim that this strain or variety is much superior to the com- mon German bees. Mr. Benton, I think, holds strongly to this opinion. After a brief trial Iam pleased with these bees. The Hungarian bees are longer than the typical German race, and are covered with gray hairs. During the poor season of 1875 in Europe, these bees, like the Carniolans, were found superior even to the Italians. The beautiful Dalmatian bees are slim, wasp-like, and very black. The rings of their abdomens are banded with lightish yellow. Their honey is even more white and beautiful than that of the German race. Some of the best Kuropean bee- keepers claim that they are superior to the Italian bees. Akin to the Dalmatian bees are the Herzegovinian variety, which comes from the mountainous region of Bosnia, border- ing on the Adriatic Sea. A better marked variety—the Smyr- nian bees—from Western Asia, and also much praised by some of the noted Austrian bee-keepers, as are also the Caucasian, from the Caucasus Mountains, which are said to be very active and amiable. The Tunisian bees, from Tunis in the north of Africa, are said to be even darker than the black or German bee. They are described as quite irritable. These were the ‘‘ Punic bees’”’ sold in the United States some years since. They did not keep in favor. Itis stated that there is a race of bees which are domesticated in the south of Africa. From the descriptions I should think them quite like our Albinos in appearance. They are said to be excellent honey-producers, and to work even by moonlight. It is quite likely that some of these varieties might be found to endure our severe winters better than the pure German type, or the Italians. Now that we are to have an experimental station in each State, we may expect that all these races will be imported, that we may prove them and know which is the best. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 59 BIBLIOGRAPHY. It would be a pleasing duty, and not an unprofitable one, to give in this connection a complete history of entomology so far as it relates to Apis mellifera. But this would take much space, and as there is quite a full history in books, that I shall recommend to those who are eager to know more of this in- teresting department of natural history, I will not go into details. Aristotle wrote of bees more than three hundred years B. C. About three hundred years later, Virgil, in his fourth Georgic, gave to the world the views then extant on this sub- ject, gathered largely from the writings of Aristotle. The poetry will ever be remarkable for its beauty and elegance— would that as much might be said for the subject matter, which, though full of interest, is full of errors. A little later, Columella, though usually careful and accurate in his observa- tions, still gave voice to the prevailing errors, though much that he wrote was valuable, and more was curious. As Mr. Langstroth once said to me, Columella wrote as one who had handled the things of which he wrote; and not like Virgil, as one who was dealing with second-hand wares. Pliny, the elder, who wrote in the second century, A. D., helped to con- tinue the erroneous opinions which previous authors had given, and not content with this, he added opinions of his own, which were not only without foundation, but were often the perfec- tion of absurdity. After this, nearly two thousand years passed with no prog- ress in natural history ; even for two centuries after the revival of learning, we find uothing of note. Swammerdam, a Dutch entomologist, in the middle of the seventeenth century, wrote a general history of insects; also, ‘‘ The Natural History of Bees.”’ He andhis English contemporary, Ray, showed their ability as naturalists by founding their systems on insect transformations. They also revived the study and practice of anatomy, which had slept since its first introduction by Aris- totle, as the great stepping-stone in zoological progress. I never open the grand work of Swammerdam, with its admir- able illustrations, without feelings of the most profound re- 60 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE} spect and admiration. Though a very pioneer in anatomy, and one of the founders of Natural Science, and possessed of lenses of very inferior quality, yet he wrote with an accuracy, and illustrated even minute tissues with a correctness and elegance that might well put to the blush many a modern writer. His description of the bee’s tongue is more accurate _ than that even of the last edition of the Encyclopedia Britanica. Ray also gave special attention to Hymenoptera, and was much aided by Willoughby and Lister. At this time Harvey, so justly noted for his discovery of the circulation of the blood, announced his celebrated dictum, ‘‘Omnia ex oyo’’—all life from eggs—which was completely established by the noted Italians, Redi and Malpighi. Toward the middle of the eighteenth century, the great Linneus—“ the brilliant Star of the North ’’—published his ‘‘Systema Nature,’’ and threw a flood of light on the whole subject of natural history. His division of insects was founded upon presence, or absence, and characteristics, of wings. This, like Swammerdam’s basis, was too narrow, yet his conclusions were remarkably correct. Linneus is noted for his accurate descriptions, and especially for his gift of the binomial method of naming plants and animals, giving in the name the genus and species, as Apis mellifera, which he was first to describe. He was also the first to introduce classes and orders, as we now understand them. When we consider the amount and character of the work of the great Swede, we can but place him among the first, if not as the first, of naturalists. Contemporary with Lin- nus (also written Linne) was Geoffroy, who did valuable work in defining new genera. In the last half of the century appeared the great work of a master in entomology, DeGeer, who based his arrangement of insects on the character of wings and jaws, and thus discovered another of Nature’s keys to aid him in unlocking her mysteries. Kirby well says, ‘‘ He united in himself the highest merit of an anatomist, a physiologist and as the observant historian of the habits and economy of insects, he is aboveall praise. What a spring of self-im- provement, enjoyment and public usefulness, is such an ability to observe as was possessed by the great DeGeer. Contemporary with Linnzeus and DeGeer was Reaumur, of OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 61 France, whose experiments and researches are of special in- terest to the apiarists. Perhaps no entomologist has done more to reveal the natural history of bees. Especially to be commended are his method of experimenting, his patience in investigation, the elegance and felicity of his word-pictures, and, above all, 27s devotion to truth. We shall have occasion to speak of this conscientious and indefatigable worker in the great field of insect life frequently in the following pages. Bonnet, of Geneva, the able correspondent of Reaumur, also did valuable work, in which the lover of bees hasa special interest. Bonnet is specially noted for his discovery and elucidation of parthenogenesis—that anomalous mode of repro- duction—as it occurs among the Aphides or plant-lice, though he did not discover that our bees, in the production of drones, illustrate the same doctrine. Though theauthor of no system, he gave much aid to Reaumur in his systematic labor. At this same period systematic entomology received great aid from Lyonnet’s valuable work. This author dissected and explained the development of acaterpillar. His descriptions and illustrations are wonderful, and will proclaim his ability as long as entomology is studied. We have next to speak of the great Dane, Fabricius—a student of Linnzus—who published his works from 1775 to 1798, and thus was revolutionizing systematic entomology at the same time that we of America were revolutionizing gov- ernment. He made the mouth organs the basis of his classifi- cation, and thus followed in the path which DeGeer had marked out; though it was scarcely beaten by the latter, while Fabri- cius left it wide and deep. His classes and ordersare no im- provement on—in fact, are not nearly as correct as—his old master’s. Jn his description of genera—where he pretended to follow nature—he has rendered valuable service. In leading scientists to study parts, before little regarded, and thus to better establish affinities, he did a most valuable work. His work is a standard, and should be thoroughly studied by all entomologists. Just at the close of the last century appeared the ‘‘ great- est Roman of them all,’’ the great Latreille, of France, whose name we have so frequently used in the classification of the 62 THE BRE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; honey-bee. His is called the Elective System, as he used wings, mouth-parts, transformations, in fact, all the organs, the entire structure. He gave usour Family Apide, our Genus Apis, and, as will be remembered, he described several of the species of this genus. In our study of this great man’s work, we constantly marvel at his extensive researches and remark- able talents. Lamarck, of this time, did very admirable work. So, too, did Cuvier, of Napoleon’s time, and the learned Dr. Leach, of England. Since then we have had hosts of workers in this field, and many worthy of not only mention but praise; yet the work has been to rub upand garnish rather than to create. Of late, Mr. F. T. Cresson, of Philadelphia, has given a synopsis of the Hymenoptera of North America, together with a list of the described species. Thisis one of the many valuable publications of the American Entomological Society. I will close this brief history with a notice of authors who are very serviceable to such as may desire to glean farther of the pleasures of systematic entomology; only remarking that at the end of the next chapter I shall refer to those who have been particularly serviceable in developing the anatomy and physiology of insects, especially of bees. VALUABLE BOOKS FOR THE STUDENT OF ENTOMOLOGY. For mere classification, no work is equal to Westwood on Insects—two volumes. In this the descriptions and illustra- tions are very full and perfect, making it easy to study the families, and even genera, of all the orders. This work and the following are out of print, butcan be got with little trouble at second-hand book-stores. Kirby and Spence—‘‘ Introduc- tion to Entomology ’’—is a very complete work. It treats of the classification, structure, habits, general economy of insects, and gives a history of the subject. It is an invaluable work, and a great acquisition to any library. Dr. Packard’s ‘‘ Guide to the Study of Insects’’ is a valuable work, and being Ameri- can is specially to be recommended. His later ‘‘ Text-Book of Entomology” is invaluable to the student. ‘‘Injurious In- sects’’ is the title of two valuable books, one by Dr. T. Harris, and the other by Mary Treat. The Reports of Dr. T. Harris, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 63 Dr. A. Fitch, and Dr. C. V. Riley, the Illinois Entomological Reports, and the Entomological Reports of the Departments of the Interior, and of Agriculture, will also be found of great value and interest. Cresson’s Synopsis, already referred to, will be indispensable to every student of bees or other Hyme- nopterous insects. Smith’s Entomology and Comstock’s En- tomology are indispensable to every person at all interested in Entomology. The Reports of the several Experiment Stations, especially New Jersey and Cornell, are of great value. (See “ Bibliography ”’ at the close of the first part of this volume.) @ 36 64 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE} CHAPTER II. ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY, In this chapter I shall give first the general anatomy or insects; then the anatomy, and still more wonderful physi- ology, of the honey-bee. ANATOMY OF INSECTS. In allinsects the body is divided into three well-marked por- tions (Fig. 1); the head (Figs. 3 and 4), which is strengthened by cross-pieces or braces (Fig. 13, 14), containing the mouth Longitudinal Section Bees’ Head (from Cowan.) a Mentum., e Ligula. k Clypeus. p Brain. bSub-mentum f,g Labialpalpus. 2 Funnel. r Oceiput. e Rods. h Head-brace. x Paraglossa. s Duct from glands, d Lora. i Pharynx. o Ocellus. t Duct from lower head-glands. t, t Labrum. # organs, the eyes, both the compound and, when present, the simple, and the antennz; the thorax, which is composed of three rings, and gives support tothe one or two pairs of wings, when present, and to the three pairs of legs; aad the abdo- OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 65 men, which is composed of a variable number of rings, and gives support to the external sex-organs, and, when present, to thesting. Within the thorax (Fig. 25) there are little more than muscles, as the concentrated strength of insects, which enables Fic. 15. Fic. 14. (AN) ey Cross Section of Head Showing Braces (After Macloskie.) c,e Chitinous rods, which sup- port the cardines. hh Strengthening rods. Head of Bee much magnified.—Original. o Epicranium. ce Clypeus. e,e Compound eyes. i Labrum. a,a Antenne. m Jaws or mandibles. maz 2d Jaws or maxille. ¢ Ligula. kk Labial palpi. them to fly with such rapidity, dwells in this confined space. Within the abdomen, on the other hand, are the sex-organs, by far the greater and more important portions of the alimentary canal, and other important organs. 66 OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. ORGANS OF THE HEAD. Of these the mouth organs (Fig. 15) are most prominent. These consist of an upper lip—labrum, and under lip—labium, andtwo pairs of jaws which move sidewise; the stronger, horny jaws, called mandibles, and the more membranous, but usually longer, named maxille. The labrum (Fig. 15,/) is well described in the name upper lip. It is attached, wsually, bya movable joint to a similarly shaped piece above it, called the clypeus (Fig. 15, c), and this latter to the broad epicranium (Fig. 15, 0), which carries the antenne, the compound, and, when present, the simple eyes (Fig. 3). The labium (Fig. 16) is not described by the name under lip, as its base forms the floor of the mouth, and its tip the tongue. The base is usually broad, and is called the mentum, and from this extends the ligula (Fig. 15, ¢), which in bees isa sucking organ or tongue. On either side, nearthe junction of theligula and mentum, arises a jointed organ, rarely absent, called the labial palpus (Fig. 15, £, 4), or, together, the labial palpi. Just within the angle formed by these latter and the ligula arise the para- glossz (Fig. 16, 7, 7,) one on either side. These are often wanting, though never in bees. The jaws or mandibles (Fig. 15, 17, m) arise one on either side just below and at the side of the labrum, or upper lip. These work sidewise instead of up and down, as in the higher animals, are frequently very hard and sharp, and sometimes armed with one or more teeth. A rudimentary tooth (Fig. 65, a, 6) is visible on the jaws of drone and queen bees. Beneath the jaws or mandibles, and inserted a little farther back, are the second jaws, or maxillw (Fig. 15, m.), less dense and firm than the mandibles, but far more complex. Each maxilla arises by a small joint (Fig. 16, c), the cardo; next this is a larger joint (Fig. 16, 4), the stipes; from this extends on the inside the broad lacinia (Fig. 16, 4, 4,) or blade, usually fringed with hairs on its inner edge, towards the mouth; while on the outside of the stripes is inserted the—from one to sev- eral jointed—maxillary palpus. In the honey-bee the maxil- lary palpi (Fig. 16,77) are very small, and consist of two joints, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 67 and in some insects are wholly wanting. Sometimes, as in some of the beetles, there is a third piece running from the stipes between the palpus and lacinia, called the galea. The Tongue of Bee.—From Cowan. a@ Mentum, J, g Labial palpi. m Funnel of tongue. b Sub-mentum. h, h L-Lacinia. n, 2, Paraglossa. c,¢ Cardines. i, i, Maxillary palpi. o Opening of tongue. d,d Lora. k, k Stipes. e Ligula hairs. Z Ligula. maxillz also move sidewise, and probably aid in holding and turning the food while it is crushed by the harder jaws, though in some cases they, too, aid in triturating the food. 68 THE BEE-KEEPERS’ GUIDE: These mouth-parts are very variable in form in different insects. In butterflies and moths, two-winged flies and bugs, they are transformed into a tube, which in the last two groups forms a hard, strong beak or piercer, well exemplified in the mosquito and bedbug. In all the other insects we find them much as in the bees, with the separate parts varying greatly in form, to agree with the habits and character of their posses- sors. No wonder DeGeer and Fabricius detected these varying forms as strongly indicative of the nature of the insect, and no wonder that by their use they were so successful in forming a natural classification. If, as seems certain, the ‘“‘ Doctrine of Natural Selection ”’ is well founded, then a change in habit is the precursor of a Fic. 17. iil iH) HANA Huu i Microscope Mounted for Dissecting.—Original. change in structure. But what organs are so intimately related to the habits of animals, as the mouth and other organs that have to do with food-taking and food-getting ? Every bee-keeper will receive great benefit by dissecting these parts and studying their form and relations for himself. By getting his children interested in the same, he will have conferred upon them one of the rarest of blessings. To dissect these parts, first remove the head and carefully pin it toa cork, passing the pin through, well back between the eyes. Now separate the parts by two needle-points, made OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 69 by inserting a needle for half its length into a wooden pen- holder, leaving the point projecting for three-fourths of an inch. With one of these in each hand commence operations. The head may be either side up. Much may be learned in dissecting large insects, like our largest locusts, even with no Antenna of Bee much magnified.—Original. s Scape. t Trachee. J Flagellum. 2 Nerves. glass; but in all cases, and especially in small insects, a good lens will be of great value. The best lens now in the market is the Coddington lens, mounted in German silver. These are imported from England. They can be procured of any optician, and cost only $1.50. These lenses can be mounted in a con- venient stand (Fig. 17), which may be made in twenty minutes. I think one of these more valuable than a large compound microscope, which costs many times as much. Were I obliged to part with either, the latter would go. Irequire my students to do a great deal of dissecting, which they enjoy very much, and find very valuable. I would much rather that my boy would become interested in such study than to have him possessor of infinite gold rings, or even ahuge gold watch with a tremendous charm. Let such pleas- ing recreation gain the attention of our boys, and they will 70 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; ever contribute to our delight, and not sadden us with anxiety and fear. The antenne (Fig. 15, a, a) are the horn-like jointed organs situated between, or below and in front of, the large compound eyes of all insects. They are sometimes short, as in the house-fly, and sometimes very long, as in crickets and green grasshoppers. They may be straight, curved, or elbowed. In form they are very varied, as thread-like, taper- ing, toothed, knobbed, fringed, feathered, etc. The antennx of many Hymenopterous insects are elbowed (Fig. 18). The long first joint inthis case is the scape, the remaining joints (Fig. 18, #) the flagellum. A large nerve (Fig. 18, 2) anda- Fic. 19. Microscopic Structure of Anten- ne, after Schiemenz, Antennal Hairs.—Original. n Nerves. h Tooth hairs. b Hairs of scape. c Cells, e, p Pits or pori. 6, ¢ Hairs of scape and flagellum. trachea (Fig. 18, ¢) enter the antenna. The function of the antenne is now pretty well, if not wholly, understood. That they often serve as most delicate touch-organs no observing apiarist can doubt. Tactile nerve-ending hairs are often found in great numbers. With the higher insects, like most Hyme- nopterons, this tactile sense of the antennz is doubtless very important. It is now fully demonstrated that the sense of smell is located in the antennz. Sulzer, in the eighteenth century, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 71 suggested that an unknown sense might exist in the antenne. Reaumur, Lyonet, Bonnet, etc., thought this might be the sense of smell. Dumeril, Lehrmann, who said that a nerve vessel and muscle entered the antenne, and Cuvier, etc., thought the sense of smell was located in the spiracles or breathing-mouths. Huber thought the organ of smell was located in the mouth. Latreille and Newport, of the last cen- tury, believed the antennz contained the organs of hearing. Strauss-Durckheim located them in the spiracles, while Wolff wrote a beautiful monograph to prove that the sense of smell was situated in the hypo-pharynx beneath the labrum. Erich- son, in 1848, discovered pits in the antenna—pori—covered with a membrane (Fig. 19, 4), which he thought organs of smell. The next year Burmeister found hairs in these pits in beetles, which varied according as the beetle ate plant-food or carrion. Leydig, in 1855, showed that Erichson was correct, that there were pits also on the antennz and pegs (Fig. 19, 9), or tooth-like hairs, perforated at the end—olfactory teeth. It remained for Hauser (1880) to complete the demonstration. He experimented with insects by the use of carbolic acid, tur- ‘pentine, etc. He found that this greatly disturbed the insects when their antennz were intact, and that even after he had withdrawn the offensive substance the insect would continue to rub its antennz as if to remove the disturbing odor—a sort of holding its nose. He then cut off the antennz to find that the insect was now insensible to the irritant. He next put food before the insects, which was quickly found and appro- priated; but after the antennz were cut off the food was found with difficulty, if at all. Experiment showed that in mating the same was true. Insects often find their mates when to us it would seem impossible. Thus, I have known hundreds of male moths to enter a room by a small opening in a window, attracted by a female within the room. I have also known them to swarm outside a closed window lured by a female within. Maleinsects have even been known to reach their mates by entering a room through astovepipe. Yet Hauser found that this ability was gone with the loss of the antennae. Kraepelin and others have since proved the correctness of 72 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE} Hauser’s conclusions. So that we now know that the antenne, in most insects at least, contain the organs of smell. Histo- logically this apparatus is found to consist of nerves (Fig. 18, n) which run from the brain to the antenne, and at the outer, sensitive end, contain a cell (Fig. 19) with one or more nuclei. These nerves may end in perforated, tooth-like hairs on the antenne (Fig. 19, 2, 6, ¢, d)in pegs which have no chitinous sheath, which push out from the bottom of pits—pori—which exist often in great numbers in the antennae (Fig. 19, 7, e, /) While Erichson first discovered the pits (Fig. 19, p, 2) in the antennez, Burmeister discovered the sensitive, nerve-ending hairs (Fig. 19, a, /, m,d,) at their bottom, and Leydig the perforated pegs, or tooth-like hairs. We may state, then, that the antennal organ of smell consists of a free or sunken hair- like body which opens by a pore or canal to a many nucleated ganglionic mass. We thus understand how the bee finds the nectar, the fly the meat, and the drone and other male insects their mates. Similar structures in and about the mouth are proved by Kraepelin and Lubbock to be organs of taste. Mr. Cheshire speaks of small pits in the antennz which he regards as organs of hearing. He gives, however, no proof of this, and the pits that hedescribes are not at all ear-like in their structure. Dr. Packard says that there is no proof that any insects except crickets and locusts have real organs of hearing. He here refers to the ear-like organs situated onthe sides of the body of theseinsects. Similar organs on the legs of the katydid are also probably auditory. Dr. C.S. Minot, in review- ing Graber’s work, says that it has not been demonstrated that even these tympanal organs are auditory, and adds that all attempts to demonstrate the existence of an auditory organ in insects has failed. There is little doubt but that this is a cor- rect statement. That insects are conscious of vibrations which with us cause sound, I think no observing person can doubt. It is proved by the love-note of the katydid, the cicada and the cricket. Every apiarist has noticed the effect of various sounds made by the bees upon their comrades of the hive; and how contagious is the sharp note of anger, the low hum of fear, and the pleasant tone of a new swarm as it commences toenter its new home. Now, whether insects take note of OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 73 these vibrations, as we recognize pitch, or whether they just distinguish the tremor, I think no one knows. There is some reason to believe that their delicate touch-organs may enable them to discriminate between vibrations, even more accurately than can we by the use of ourears. A slight jar will quickly awaken acolony of hybrids, while a loud noise will pass un- noticed. If insects can appreciate with great delicacy the different vibratory conditions of the air by an excessive devel- opment of the sense of touch, then undoubtedly the antennz may be great aids. Dr. Clemens thought that insects could Fic. 20. Facets of Compound Fyes, after Dujardin. Section of Compound Eye, after Gagenbower. fF Facets, ¢ Cornea, C Cells, HT Hairs. A Rods. O Nerve. only detect atmospheric vibrations. So, too, thought Linnzus and Bonnet. Mayer has proved that the hairs on the antenne of mosquitoes vibrate to different sounds. From our present knowledge, this view seems the most reasonable one, for noth- ing answering in the least to ears, structurally, has yet been discovered. The eyes are of two kinds, the compound, which are always present in mature insects, and the ocelli or simple eyes, which may or may not be present. When present there are usually three of these ocelli (Fig. 3), which, if joined by lines, will describe a triangle, in the vertices of whose angles 74 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; are the ocelli. Rarely there are but two ocelli, and very rarely but one. The simple eyes (Fig. 3, ///) are circular, and possess a cornea, lens or cone, and retina, which receives the nerve of sight. From the experiments of Reaumur and Swammerdam, which consisted in covering the eyes with varnish, they con- Seana ys Sa aa as a LWUZ Longitudinal Section Eye.—From Cowan. c Facet. ce Lenses. m Basilar membrane. h Hair. P\p2p3 Rods. o Optic nerve. cluded that vision with these simple eyes is very indistinct, though by them the insect can distinguish light. Some have thought that these simple eyes were for vision at slight dis- tances. lubbock, Forel, and others, are doubtless correct in the view that the ocelli are for near vision, and for use in dark OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. ‘ 75 places. Larve, like spiders and most myriapods, have only simple eyes. The compound eyes (Fig. 3) are simply a cluster of simple eyes, so crowded that they are hexagonal (Fig. 20). Thecornea or facet (Fig. 20) is transparent, modified, chitinous skin. Just Fic, 23. Retinule of Lye, after Dujardin, Longitudinal Section of part . of Hye, after Cowan. Rods much magnified, after Dujardin. ce Facet. ce Cones. n Nuclei. r Retinule. within each facet is the crystalline lens (Fig. 22, cc) or crystal- line cone back of which extend the rods (Fig. 21, 2, Fig. 23, cc) which consist of chitinous threads. Each rod is surrounded by rounded columns, eight in bees (Fig. 24)—retinule—which 76 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE ; are enclosed by pigment membranes. ‘This serves in the black lining of our own eyes and of optical instruments, to limit or absorb the rays of light. At the base of the rods is spread the nervous termination of the great optic nerves (Fig. 21), which extend from very near the brain, and which, before reaching the eye, passes through the three ganglionic enlargements (Fig. 22). Unlike the same in vertebrate eyes, the rods point forward. It is thought that the optic nerve is very short, and that the retina of other higher animals is represented by the three enlargements (Fig. 22), which, as in higher animals, are fibrous cellular and ganglionic, and by the central rods of the reti- nulaw. The sensitive portion is doubtless the end of these rods. Insects, like bees, have a well-developed crystalline cone (Fig. 23), and such eyes are called eucone ; others have this less de- veloped, and their eyes are called pseudocone. The old theory of Leeuwenhoek, Gottsche, and Platean, that each of the parts of a compound eye, each ommatidium, forms a distinct image, and these together make a compound whole, as, do our two eyes, the images overlapping, is now abandoned for the mosaic theory of Muller. Lubbock argues strongly for this view, and nearly all now accept it as true. Each of the ommatidia give a direct, not reverse, image, as do the ocelli, andeach an image of only a point. Thus, the image is a true mosaic, as Muller called it. The crystalline cone covered with black pigment permits only a point to be imag- ined, and so each of the separate eyes or ommatidia imagesa separate point of the object seen, and all the entire object. Lubbock argues that the compound eyes do not determine form, but only motion, and that is what would be useful to protect the insect. Delicate trachexe pass into the eyes between the rods. The color of eyes varies very much, owing to the pigment. In some of the bees, wasps and Diptera, or two-winged flies, the coloration is exceedingly beautiful. Girschner thinks that insects with highly colored eyes do not see as well as others. Often the irridescence or play of colors, as the angle of vision changes, is wonderfully rich. The form, size, and position of eyes vary much, as seen by noticing the eyes (Fig. 3, +) of drones and workers. Some- OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 77 times, as in bees (Fig. 3, 4), the eyes are hairy, the hairs aris- ing from between the facets. These hairs are protective, and very likely tactile. Usually the eyes are naked. The number of simple eyes which form the compound eye is often pro- digious. There may be 25,000 in a single compound eye. There are 4,000 or 5,000 in the worker-bee. The compound eyes are motionless, but from their size and sub-spherical shape they give quite a range of vision. It is not likely that they are capable of adjustment to accord with different distances, and it has been supposed, from the direct, darting flight of bees totheir hives, and the awkward work they make in finding a hive when moved onlya short distance, that their eyes are best suited to long vision. Sir John Lubbock has proved, by some interesting experi- ments with strips of colored paper, that bees can distinguish colors. Honey was placed on a blue strip, beside several others of various colors. In the absence of the bees he changed the position of this strip, and upon their return the bees went to the blue strip rather than to the old position. Our practical apiarists have long been aware of this fact,and have con- formed their practice to this knowledge, in giving a variety of colors to their hives. Apiarists have frequently noted that bees have arare faculty of marking positions, but for slight distances their sense of color will correct mistakes which would occur if position alone were their guide. Platean argues that insects are little guided by color, as they find flowers with no color, or the color obscured. This does not prove that color is not an aid, but that another sense—evidently of smell— supplements the sense of sight. Lubbock’s experiments prove that ants and wasps also distinguish colors. This is doubtless true of all insects that love sweets and are attracted by flowers. I have noticed a curious blunder made by bees in case of two houses which are just alike, but five rods apart. Honey placed on one porch is scarce found by bees before the corresponding porch of the other house will be swarming with bees also, though no honey is nearit. The bees are simply fooled. This experiment has been tried several times, so there can be no mistake. It shows that sight, not mere position, nor yet odor, is. guide, even at 78 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; long distances. This disprovesthe general view that insects can see but at very short range. Within the head is the large brain (Fig. 27, 6), which will be described as we come to speak of the nervous system. There are also chitinous bars (Fig. 14) and braces within, which serve greatly to strengthen this portion of the insect. . APPENDAGES OF THH THORAX. The organs of flight are the most noticeable appendages of the thorax. The wings are usually four, though the Diptera have but two, and some insects—as the worker-ants—have none. Thefront or primary wings (Fig. 2) are usually larger than the secondary or hind wings, and thus the mesothoracic Fic. 25, Muscles of Thorax, after Wolff. ZI Muscles to raise front wing. D Muscles to lower front wing. A Muscles of hind wing. or middle ring of the thorax, to which they are attached, is usually larger than the metathorax or thirdring. The wings consist of a broad frame-work of veins (Fig. 2), covered bya thin, tough membrane. The main ribs or veins are variable in number, while towards the extremity of the wing are more or less cross-veins, dividing this portion of the wings into more orless cells. In the higher groups these cells are few, and quite important in classifying. Especially useful in group- ing bees into their families and genera are the cells in the OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 79 second row, from the front or costal edge of the primary wings, called the sub-costal cells. Thus, in the genus Apis there are three such cells (Fig. 2—6, 7, 8), while in the Melipona there are only two. The ribs or veins consist of a tube within a tube, the inner one forming an air-tube, the outer one carrying blood. On the costal edge of the secondary wings we often find hooks (Fig. 2, 4) to attach them to the front wings. The wings are moved by powerful muscles, compactly located in the thorax (Fig. 25), the strength of which is very great. The rapidity of the vibrations of the wings when flight is rapid, is aimost beyond computation. Marey found by his Fic. 26. favyl Hairs of Bees.—Originat. ingenious and graphic method that they number in the bee 190 in asecond. This may be far from the maximum. Think of a tiny fly out-stripping the fleetest horse in the chase, and then marvel at this wondrous mechanism. The legs (Fig. 1, g, g, g) are six in number in. all mature insects, two on the lower side of each ring of the thorax. ‘These are long or short, weak or strong, according to the habit of the insect. Each leg consists of the following joints or parts: The coxa (Fig. 67,c), which moves like a ball-and- socket joint in the close-fitting coxal cavities of the body- rings. Next to this follow in order the broad trochanter (Fig. 67,7,) which is double in several families of Hymenoptera like the very valuable ichneumon and chalcid flies, the large, broad femur (Fig. 66, /), the long, slim tibia (Fig. 67, 7), frequently bearing strong spines at or near its end, called tibial spurs, and followed by the from one to five jointed tarsi (Fig. 67, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). All these parts move freely upon each other, and will vary in form to agree with theiruse. At the end of the 80 THE BERE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; last tarsal joint are two hooked claws (Fig. 68), between which are the pulvilli, which are not air-pumps as usually described, but rather glands, which secrete a sticky substance which en- ables insects to stick to a smooth wall, even though it be abovethem. ‘The legs, and in fact the whole crust, are more or less dense and hard, owing to the deposit within the structure of chitine. The hairs of insects (Fig. 26) are very various in form, development and function. Some areshort, others long ; some simple, others beautifully feathered; some are tactile, like those of the eyes of the bees, some are protective and for warmth, and some are used as brushes, combs, and for collect- ing, transferring and carrying pollen. INTERNAL ANATOMY OF INSECTS. The muscles of insects are usually whitish. Sometimes I have noticed quite a pinkish hue about the muscles of the thorax. They vary in form and position to accord with their use. The mechanism of contraction is the same as in higher animals. The ultimate fibers of the voluntary muscles, when highly magnified, show the striz or cross-lines, the same as do the voluntary muscles of vertebrates, and are very beautiful as microscopic objects. The fibers of each separate muscle are not bound together by a membrane, asin higher animals. In in- sects the muscles are widely distributed, though, as we should expect, they are concentrated in the thorax and head. In insects of swiftest flight, like the bee, the thorax (Fig. 25) is almost en- tirely composed of muscles; the cesophagus, which carries the food to the stomach, being very small. At the base of the jaws (Fig. 65) the muscles are large and firm. ‘The number of muscles is astounding. Lyonet counted over 3,000 in a single caterpillar, nearly eight times as many as are foundin the human body. The strength, too, of insects is prodigious. There must be quality in muscles, for muscles as large as those of the elephant, and as strong as those of the flea, would hardly need the fulcrum which the old philosopher demanded in order to move the world. . Fleas have been made to draw miniature cannon, chains and wagons many hundred times heavier than themselves. OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 81 The nerves of insects are in no wise peculiar, so far as known, except in position. Each nerve consists of a bundle of fibers, some of which are sensitive, and some motor. Asin Diagram showing Internal ‘Organs of Bee, (modified), from Cowan, Hf Head. ig Supra esophageal ganglia. hs Honey-stomach. T Thorax. gg Ganglia on nerve cord. s Stomach. A Abdomen. as Air sacs. m Stomach-mouth. b Brain. tt Trachee. i Deum. # Rectum. : mt Malpighian tubules. r,g Rectal glands. our bodies, some are knotted, or have ganglia, and some are not. The main nervous cord is double, and has several enlarge- ments (Fig. 27, 28) or ganglia. It runs along the under or ven- 82 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; tral side of the body, separates near the head, and after pass- ing around the cesophagus, enlarges to form the largest of the ganglia, which serves as a brain (Fig. 27, 28). The uncovered Fic. 28. Nervous System of Drone, after Dunean. brain shows marked convolutions (Fig. 30). Dujardin states that the brain of the worker-bee is 1-174 of the body ; in the drone it is relatively much smaller; the ant, 1-286; the ich- OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 83 neumon, 1-400; water beetle, 14200. In man it is 1-40. So we see that the bee is at the summit of insect intelligence, as man is of the vertebrate. The convolutions (Fig. 30) add to the argument. From the brain many fibers extend on each side to the compound eyes. The minute nerves extend everywhere, and in squeezing out the viscera of an insect, are easily visible. In the larva the nerve cord is much as in the adult insect, ' except the ganglia are more numerous. Girard says, that at first in the larva of the bee there are seventeen ganglia. The supra-cesophageal of the brain, three sub-cesophageal, three thoracic—one for each ring—and ten abdominal. Soon the three sub-cesophageal merge into one, as doalso the last three abdominal, when there are in all thirteen (Fig. 31). In the Fic. 29. Brain of Insect, after Dujardin. aa Antenne. ooo Ocelli. pupa, the last two of the thorax, and the first two abdominal, unite into the twin-like post-thoracic (Fig. 31), which supplies the meso, and meta-thoracic legs, and both pairs of wings with nerves. The fourth and fifth ganglia also unite, so that the adult worker-bee has nine ganglia in all. The brain or supra- cesophageal (Fig. 27), supplies nerves to the compound eyes, ocelli, antennz and labrum; the sub-cesophageal gives off nerves to the mandibles, maxille, and labium ; the first gan-, glion of the thorax sends nerves to the anterior legs. There are only four abdominal ganglia in the drone. The brain (Fig. 29, 30), like our own, is enclosed in membranes, is com- posed of white and gray matter, and is undoubtedly the seat of intelligence. Hence, as we should suppose, the brain of the 84 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE, worker is much larger than that of either the drone or queen, The ganglia along the cord are the seat of reflex acts the same asis the gray matter of our own spinal cord. Indeed, the beheaded bee uses its members much more naturally than do the higher animals after they have lost their heads. This may arise from their more simple organism, or from a higher devel- opment of the ganglia in question. The organs of circulation in insects are quite insignificant. The heart (Fig. 32, 7) isa long tube situated along the back, to which it is held by large muscles (Fig. 32, 1), and receives Fic. 31. Brain of Bee, from Cowan. Nervous System of Worker Larva, after Duncan. the blood at valvular openings (Fig. 32 0, 33 a,) along its sides which only permit the fluid to pass in, when, by contraction, it is forced toward the head and emptied into the general cavity. Valves prevent the blood from flowing back (Fig. 33, 6.) Thus the heart only serves to keep the blood in motion. There are no vessels to carry the blood to the various organs, nor is this necessary, for the nutritive fluid every- OR, MANUAI, OF THER APIARY. 85 where bathes the digestive canal, and thus easily receives nutriment, or gives waste by osmosis ; everywhere surrounds the trachez or air-tubes—the insect’s lungs—and thus receives that most needful of all food, oxygen, and gives the baneful carbonic acid; everywhere touches the various organs, and gives and takes as the vital operations of the animal require. The heart, like animal vessels, generally, consists of an outer serous membrane, an inner, epithelial coat, and a middle muscular layer. Owing to the opaque crust, the pulsations of the heart can not generally be seen ; but in some transparent larve, like many maggots, some parasites—those of our com- mon cabbage butterfly show this admirably—and especially in aquatic larve, the pulsations are plainly visible, and are most interesting objects of study. The heart, as shown by Lyonet, is held to the dorsal wall by muscles (Fig. 32, m). Beneath the heart are muscles which, Fic. 32. Fic. 33. b } a oa“ b |] Portion of Heart of an Insect, after Packard. ? t Heart. m Muscles. o Openings. Diagram of Heart, from Cowan. to quote from Girard, form a sort of horizontal diaphragm (Fig. 34, d), which as Graber shows contract, and thus aid circulation. The blood is light colored, and entirely destitute of red discs or corpuscles, which are so numerous in the blood of higher animals, and which give our bloodits red color. The function of these red discs is to carry oxygen, and as oxygen is carried everywhere through the body by the ubiquitous air- tubes of insects, we see the red discsare not needed. Except for these semi-fluid discs, which are real organs, and nourished as are other organs, the blood of higher animalsis entirely 86 THE BRE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; fluid, in all normal conditions, and contains not the organs themselves, or any part of them, but only the elements, which are absorbed by the tissue and converted into the organs, or, to be scientific, are assimilated. The bloodof insects is nearly destitute of discs, having only white corpuscles. The white corpuscles are called leucocytes. They are now known to act as so many animals, and are powerful for good in destroying microbes. We thus call them phagocytes. ‘These phagocytes, in insect trausformations, remove, we may say eat up, the no longer useful organs. It is this way that a tadpole’s tail is Fic. 34, Cross Section of Bee, after Cheshire. h Heart. Tr. Trachee. St, Stomach. ga Ganglion. d Diaphragm. removed. This process is known as phagocytosis. The leu- cocytes are also found in the digested food, and like the same in higher animals, are amoeboid. Schonfeld has shown that the blood, chyle, the digested food, and larval food, are much the same. The respiratory or breathing system of insects consists of a very complicated system of air-tubes (Fig. 1, 27). These tubes (Fig. 35), which are constantly branching, and almost infinite in number, are very peculiar in their structure. They are composed of a spiral thread, and thus resemble a hollow cylinder formed by closely winding a fine wire spirally abouta rod, so as to cover it, and then withdrawing the latter, leaving OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 87 the wire unmoved. This spiral elastic thread, like the rings of cartilage in our own trachea, serves to make the tubes rigid ; and like our trachea—wind pipe—so these trachez or air-tubes in insects are lined within and covered without bya thin membrane. Nothing is more surprising and interesting than this labyrinth of beautiful tubes, as seen in dissecting a bee under the microscope. I have frequently detected myself taking long pauses, in making dissections of the honey-bee, as my attention would be fixed in admiration of this beautiful breathing apparatus. In the bee these tubes expand in large lung-like sacs (Fig. 1, /), one on each side of the body. Doubt- less some of my readers have associated the quick movements and surprising activity of birds and most mammals with their well developed lungs, so in such animals as the bees, we see the relation between this intricate system of air-tubes—their Fic. 35. A Trachea, magnified.—Original. lungs—and the quick, busy life which has been proverbial of them since the earliest time. Along the sides of the body are the spiracles or breathing-mouths, which vary in number. The full-grown larva has twenty, while the imago has seven pairs ; two on the thorax—one on the prothorax, and one on the metathorax—and five on theabdomen. The drone has one more on each side of the abdomen. We see, then, that to strangle an insect we would not close the mouth, but these spiracles along the sides of the body. We now understand why the bee so soon dies when the body is daubed with honey. These spiracles are armed with a complex valvular arrangement which ex- cludes dust or other noxious particles. From these extends the labyrinth of air-tubes (Fig. 1, /, f, 27 ¢, ¢), which carries 88 THE BRE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; vitalizing oxygen into every part of the insect organism. As shown long ago by Leydig and Weismann, these air-tubes are but an invagination of the derm of the insect. What is more curious, these trachez are molted or shed with the skin of the larve. In the more active insects—as in bees—the main trachez, one on each side of the abdomen, are expanded into large air-sacs (Fig. 1,/). Insects often show a respiratory motion, which in beesis often very marked. Newport has shown that in bees the rapidity of the respiration, which varies from twenty to sixty per minute, gauges the heat in the hive, and thus we see why bees in times of severe cold, which they: essay to keep at bay by forced respiration, consume much food, exhale much foulair and moisture, and are liable to disease. Newport found that in cases of severe cold there would be quite a rise of mercury in a thermometer which he suspended in the hive amidst the cluster. In the larval state, many insects breathe by fringe-like gills. The larval mosquito has gills in the form of hairy tufts, while in the larval dragon-fly the gills are inside the rectum, or last part of the intestine. The insect, by a muscular effort, draws the water slowly in at the anus, where it bathes these singularly placed branchie, and then makes it serve a further turn by forcibly expelling it, when the insect is sent darting ahead. Thus, this curious apparatus not only furnishes oxygen, but also aids in locomotion. In the pupe of insects there is little or no motion, yet important organic changes are taking place—the worm-like, ignoble, creeping, often repulsive, larva, is soon to appear as the airy, beautiful, active, almost setherealimago. So oxygen, the most essential—the sine gua non—of all animal food is still needed. ‘The bees are too wise to seal the brood-cell with impervious wax, but rather add the porous capping, made of wax from old comb and pollen. The pupe, no less than the larve of some two-winged flies which live in water, have long tubes which reach far out for the vivifying air, and are thus called rat-tailed. Even the pupe of the mosquito, awaiting in its liquid home the glad time when it shall unfoldits tiny wings and pipe its war-note, has a similar arrangement to secure the gaseous pabulum. The digestive apparatus of insects is very interesting, and, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 89 as in our own class of animals, varies very much in length and complexity, as the hosts of insects vary in their habits. Asin mammals and birds, the length, with some striking exceptions, varies with the food. Carnivorous or flesh-eating insects have a short alimentary canal, while in those that feed on vegetable food it is much longer. The mouth I have already described. Following this (Fig. 27) is the throat or pharynx, then the cesophagus or gullet (Fig. 36, 0), which may expand, as in the bee, to form the honey- stomach (Fig. 36, 4s), may have an attached crop like the Fic. 36. Cross Section of Ileum, after Schiemenz. Alimentary Canal of Honey-Bee, modified, from Wolff. o (Esophagus. sm Stomach-mouth. hs Honey-stomach. s True stomach. e Urinary tubes. i Small intestine or ileum. rg Rectal glands. r Large intestine or rectum. chicken, or may run as a uniform tube, as in the human body, to the true stomach (Fig. 36,5). Following this is the intes- tine—separated by some authors into an ileum (Fig. 36, 7), and a rectum which ends in the vent or anus. The entire alimentary canal, except the stomach, is devel- oped from the ectoderm, or skin derm, and all is shed in molting. The stomach, often called the mid-stomach, to dis- tinguish it from the fore and hind, is derived from the endo- derm, and is not molted. Connected with the mouth are salivary glands (Fig. 58, 59), which are structurally much like 90 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE}; those in higher animals. There is an inner and an outer chitinous layer, and the intervening cellular or epithelial, where secretion takes place. In those larve that form cocoons these are the source of silk. In the glands this is a viscid fluid, but as it leaves the duct it changes instantly into the gossamer thread. Bees and wasps use this saliva in forming their structures. With it and mud some wasps make mortar; with it and wood, others form their paper cells; with it and wax, the bee fashions the rib- bons that are to form the beautiful comb. As will be seen later, these glands are very complex in bees, and the function of the secretion very varied in both composition and function. Lining the entire alimentary canal are mucus glands which secrete a viscid fluid that keeps the tube soft and pro- motes the passage of food. These lining cells also absorb, and may secrete a digestive fluid. The true stomach (Fig. 36, s; 27 S), is very muscular; and often a gizzard, as in the crickets, where its interior is lined with teeth. The interior of the stomach is glandular, for secreting the gastric juice which is to liquefy the food, that it may be absorbed, or pass through the walls of the canal into the blood. Appended to the anterior end of the stomach are the from two to eight coeca, or, as in some beetles, very numerous villi or tubules. These are believed by Plateau and others tobe pancreatic in function. Theseare not found in bees. Attached tothe lower portion of the stomach are the urinary or Mal- pighian tubules (Fig. 27, m, ¢), so named from their discoverer, Malpighi. There may be two to eight long tubes, or many short ones as in the bees, where we find 150. The finding in these of urea, uric acid and the urates settles the matter of their function. Cuvier and others thought these bile-tubules. Siebold thinks that some of the mucous glands secrete bile, and others act as a pancreas. The intestine, when short, as in larve and most carnivora, is straight, and but little, if any, longer than the abdomen, while in most plant-eaters it is long, and thus zigzag in its course. It isa very interesting fact that the alimentary canal in the larva may be partly shed at the time of molting, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY, 91 Strange as it may seem, the fecal pellets of some insects are beautiful in form, and of others pleasant to the taste. These fecal masses under trees or bushes often reveal the presence of caterpillars. I find my children use them toexcellent purpose in finding rare specimens. In some caterpillars they are barrel-shaped, artistically fluted, of brilliant hue, and, if fos- silized, would be greatly admired, as have been the coprolites— fossil feces of higher animals—if set as gems in jewelry. As itis, they would form no mean parlor ornament. In other insects, as the Aphides, or plant-lice, the excrement, as well as the fluid that escapes from the general surface of the body, the anus, or in some species from special tubes called the nectaries, is very sweet, and in absence of floral nectar will often be appropriated by bees and conveyed to the hives. In those insects that suck their food, as bees, butterflies, moths, two-winged flies and bugs, the feces are liquid, while in case of solid food the excrement is nearly solid. It is doubtless this liquid excreta falling from bees that has been referred to often as a fine mist. SECRETORY ORGANS OF INSKCTS. I have already spoken of the salivary glands, which Kirby describes as distinct from the true silk-secreting tubes, though Newport thinks them one and the same. In many insects these seem absent. I have also spoken of the mucus glands, the urinary tubules, etc. Besides these, there are other secre- tions which serve for purposes of defense. In the queen and workers of bees, and in ants and wasps, the poison intruded with the sting is an example. This is secreted by glands at the posterior of the abdomen, stored in sacs (Fig. 38, pg), and extruded through the sting as occasion requires. I know of no insects that poison while they bite, except mosquitoes, gnats, and some bugs. Mosquitoes and some flies, in biting, convey, as do ticks, germs of malaria or noxious protozoans, and so induce disease. A few exceedingly beautiful caterpillars are covered with branching spines, which sting about like a nettle. We have three such species. They are green, and of rare attraction, so that to capture them is worth the slight inconvenience arising 92 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE, from their irritating punctures. Some insects, like many bugs, flies, beetles, and even butterflies, secrete a disgusting fluid, or gas, which affords protection, as by its stench it renders these filthy bugs so offensive that even a hungry bird or half-famished insect passes them by on the other side. Some insects secrete a gas which is stored in a sac at the pos- terior end of the body, and shot forth with an explosion in case danger threatens; thus by noise and smoke it startles its enemy, which beats a retreat. I have heard the little bom- bardier beetle at such times, even at considerable distances. The frightful reports about the terrible horn of the tomato- worm larva are mere nonsense; a more harmless animal does not exist. My little boy of four years, and girl of only two, used to bring them to me in the summer, and regard them as admiringly as would their father upon receiving them from’ the delighted children. If we except bees and wasps, there are no true insects that need be feared; nor need we except them, for with fair usage even they are seldom provoked to use their cruel weapon. The so-called ‘‘ kissing bugs,’’ which usually bite on the legs, and not on the lips, are too rare to be feared. There are two or three species of these biting bugs. SEX-ORGANS OF INSECTS. The male organs consist of the testes (Fig. 37, a), which are double. These are made up of tubules or vesicles, of which there may be from one, as in the drone-bee, to several, as in some beetles, on each side the abdominal cavity. In these vesicles grow the sperm cells, or spermatozoa (Fig. 50), which, when liberated, pass through a long convoluted tube, the vas deferens (Fig. 37, 4, 6), into the seminal sac (Fig. 37, ¢, ¢), where, in connection with mucus, they are stored. In most insects there are grandular sacs (Fig. 37, d) joined to these seminal receptacles, which, in the male bee, are very large. The sperm cells mingled with these viscid secretions, as they appear in the seminal receptacle ready for use, form the seminal fluid. Extending from these seminal receptacles is the ejaculatory duct (Fig. 37, e, 4g), which, in copulation, carries the male fluid to the penis (Fig. 37, 2), through which it OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 93 passes to the oviduct of the female. Beside this latter organ are the sheath, the claspers, when present, and, in the male ’ pee, those large yellow glandular sacs (Fig. 37, 7), which are often seen to dart forth as the drone is held in the warm hand. Fic. 37. Male Organs of Drone, much magnified. a Testes. e Common duct. bb Vasa deferentia. Jg Ejaculatory duct. ce Seminal sacs. hf, Penis. d Glandular sacs. i Yellow saccules. The female organs (Fig. 38) consist of the ovaries (Fig. 38, 0, 0), which are situated one on either side of the abdominal cavity. From these extended the two oviducts (Fig. 38, D), which unite into the common oviduct (Fig. 38, D), through which the eggs pass in deposition. In the higher Hymenop- tera there is beside this oviduct, and connected with it, a sac 94 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE} (Fig. 38, s, 6) called the spermatheca, which receives the male fluid in copulation, and which, by extruding its contents, must ever after do the work of impregnation. This sac was discovered, and its use suggested, by Mal- Female Organs, magnified, from Leuckart, O Ovaries. Pg Poison glands, DD Oviduets. Sy Sting glands, Sb Spermatheca, & Sting. Pb Poison sac, pighi as early as 1686, but its function was not fully demon- strated until 1792, when the great anatomist, John Hunter, showed that in copulation this was filled. The ovaries are multitubular organs. In some insects, as laying workers, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 95 there are but very few tubes—twoor three; while in the queen- bee there are more than one hundred. In these tubes the ova or eggs grow, as do the sperm-cells in the vesicles of the testes. The number of eggsis variable. Some insects, as the mud- wasps, produce very few, while the queen white-ant extrudes millions. The end of the oviduct, called the ovipositor, is wonderful in its variation. Sometimes it consists of concen- tric rings, like a spy-glass, which may be pushed out or drawn in; sometimes of a long tube armed with augers or saws of wonderful finish, to prepare for eggs; or again of a tube which may also serveas a sting. ‘The females of all Hymenop- tera possess a very complex sting, saw, or ovipositor, which can be said of no other order. Most authors state that insects copulate only once, or at least that the female meets the male but once. Many species like the squash-bug mate several times. In some cases, as we shall see in the sequel, the male is killed by the copulatory act. I think this curious fatality is limited to few species. To study viscera, which of course requires very careful dissection, we need more apparatus than has been yet described. Here a good lens is indispensable. A small dis- secting-knife, a delicate pair of forceps, and some small, sharp-pointed dissecting scissors—those of the renowned Swammerdam were so fine at the point that it required a lens to sharpen them—which may also serve toclip the wings of queens, are requisite to satisfactory work. Specimens put in alcohol will be improved, as the oil will be dissolved out, and the muscles hardened. Formalin is much cheaper, and on many accounts better than alcohol. It does not evaporate as readily, and the specimens preserved in it do not smell offen- sive. Placing specimens in hot water willdo nearly as well, in which case oil of turpentine will dissolve off the fat. This may be applied with a camel’s-hair brush. By dissecting under water the loose portions will float off, and render effect- ive work more easy, Swammerdam, who had that most valuable requisite to a naturalist—unlimited patience—not only dissected out the parts, but with small glass tubes, fine as a hair, he injected the various vessels, as the alimentary canal and air-tubes. My reader, why may not you look in 96 TH BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE} upon these wondrous beauties and marvels of God’s own handiwork—Nature’s grand exposition? Father, why would nota set of dissecting instruments be a most suitable gift to your son? You might thus sow the seed which would germi- nate into a Swammerdam, and that on your own hearth-stone. Messrs. Editors, why do not you keep boxes of these instru- ments for sale, and thus aid to light the torch of genius, and hasten apiarian research? TRANSFORMATION OF INSECTS. What in all the realm of nature is so worthy to awaken delight and admiration as the astonishing changes which insects undergo? Just think of the sluggish, repulsive cater- pillar, dragging its heavy form over clod or bush, or mining in dirt and filth, changed, by the wand of Nature’s great magician, first into the motionless chrysalis, decked with green and gold, and beautiful as the gem that glitters on the finger of beauty, then bursting forth as the graceful, gorgeous butterfly ; which, by its brilliant tints and elegant poise, out- rivals even the birds among the life-jewels of Nature, and is made fit to revelin all her decorative wealth. The little fly, too, with wings dyed in rainbow hues, flitting like a fairy from leaf to flower, was but yesterday the repulsive maggot, reveling in the veriest filth of decaying Nature. The grub to-day drags its slimy shape through the slums of earth, on which it fattens; to-morrow it will glitter as the brillant set- ting in the bracelet and ear-drops of the gay and thoughtless belle. There are four separate stages in the development of insects: The egg, the larva, the pupa, and the imago. THE EGG. This is not unlike the same in higher animals. It has its yolk, the real egg, and its surrounding white or albumen, like the eggs of all mammals, and farther, the delicate shell, which is familiar in the eggs of birds and reptiles. Eggs of insects are often beautiful in form and color, and not infrequently ribbed and fluted (Fig. 41), as by a master hand. The form of eggs is very various—spherical, oval, cylindrical, oblong, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 97 straight, and curved (Fig. 39, a, 6). Through the egg is an opening (Fig. 41, 4, B, m), the micropyle, through which passes the sperm-cells. All insects seem to be guarded by a wonderful knowledge, or instinct, or intelligence, in the pla- cing of eggs on or near the peculiar food of the larva, even though in many cases such food is no part of the aliment of theimago. The fly has the refined habits of the epicure, from whose cup it daintily sips, yet its eggs are placed in the horse- droppings of stable and pasture. Inside the egg wonderful changes soon commence, and their consummation is a tiny larva. Somewhat similar changes can be easily and most profitably studied by breaking aud examining a hen’s egg each successive day of incubation. As with the eggs of our own species, and of all higher ani- mals, the egg of insects, or the yolk, the essential part—the white is only food, so to speak—soon segments or divides into a great many cells—in the morula stage—which soon unite into three membranes, the blastoderms—blastula stage—which are the initial animal; these blastoderms soon form a single arch or sac, and not a double arch, one above the other, as in our own vertebrate branch. This sac, looking like a miniature bag of grain, grows by absorption, becomes articulated, and by budding out is soon provided with the various members. At first the sixteen or seventeen segments are much alike, and all bear appendages. From the three segments of the head come the antenne and mouth organs, from the three thoracic rings the three pairs of legs, while the remaining abdominal joints generally soon lose all show of appendages, which are never present in the imago. The trachez, and fore and hind intestines, all but the stomach, are but invaginations of the ectoderm or skin membrane, and so are shed when the skin is moulted. Asin higher animals, these changes are consequent upon heat, and usually, not always, upon the incorporation within the eggs of the sperm-cells from the male, which enter the egg at an opening called the micropyle. The time it takes the embryo inside the egg to developis gauged by heat, and will, therefore, vary with the season and temperature, though in different species it varies from days to months. The num- ber of eggs which an insect may produce is subject to wide 98 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; variation. There may be a score of them; there may be thousands. THE LARVA OF INSECTS. From the egg comes the larva, also called grub, maggot, caterpillar, and very erroneously worm. These are worm- shaped (Fig. 39), usually have strong jaws, simple eyes, and the body plainly marked into ring divisions. In some insects there are fourteen of these rings or segments, or ten besides the head and three rings of the thorax. In bees, and nearly all other insects (Fig. 39, /), there is one less abdominal ring. Often, as in case of some grubs, larval bees, and maggots, there are no legs. In most grubs there are six legs, two to each of the three rings succeeding the head. Besides these, caterpillars have usually ten prop-legs farther back on the body, though a few—the loopers or measuring caterpillars— have only four or six, while the larve of the saw-flies have from twelve to sixteen of the false or prop-legs. The alimen- tary canal of larval insects is usually short, direct, and quite simple, while the sex-organs are slightly if at all developed. The larve of insects are voracious eaters—indeed, their only work seems to be to eat and grow fat. This rapid growth is well shown in the larva of the bee, which increases during its brief period from egg to full-grown larva—less than five days— from 1200 to 1500 times its weight. As the entire growth occurs at this stage, their gormandizing habits are the more excusable. I have often been astonished at the amount of food that the insects in my breeding cases would consume. The skin or crust of insects is unyielding, hence growth requires that it shall be cast. This shedding of the skin is called moulting. It isa strange fact, already mentioned, that the treachee and a part of the alimentary canal are cast off with the skin. Most insects moult from four to six times. That bees moult was even known to Swammerdam. Vogel speaks of the thickening of the cells because of these cast-skins. Dr. Packard observed many years since, that in the thin-skinned iarve, such as those of bees, wasps, and gall-flies, the mouits are not apparent; as these larve increase in size, they out- grow the old skin which comes off in shreds. The length of . OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 99 time which insects remain as larve is very variable. The maggot revels in decaying meat but two or three days; the larval bee eats its rich pabulum for nearly a week; the apple- tree borer gnaws away for three years ; while the seventeen- year cicada remains a larva for more than sixteen years, groping in darkness and feeding on roots, only to come forth fora few days of hilarity, sunshine, and courtship. Surely, here is patience exceeding even that of Swammerdam. The name larva, meaning masked, was given to this stage by Lin- neus, as the mature form of the insect is hidden, and can not be even divined by the unlearned. THE PUPA OF INSKCTS. In this stage the insect is in profound repose, as if resting after its meal, the better to enjoy its active, sportive days— the joyous honeymoon—soontocome. At this time the insect may look like a seed, as in the coarctate pupa of diptera, so familiar in the ‘‘ flaxseed’ state of the Hessian-fly, or in the pupa of the cheese-maggot, or the meat-fly. The form of the adult insect is very obscurely shown in butterfly pupz, called, because of their golden spots, chrysalids, and in the pupz of moths. Other pupz,as in the case of bees (Fig. 39, g) and beetles, look not unlike the mature insect with its antenne, legs, and wings closely bound to the body bya thin membrane, hence the name pupa which Linne gave—referring to this con- dition—as the insect looks as if wrapped in swaddling clothes, the old cruel way of torturing the infant, as if it needed hold- ing together. The pupa, andso of course the imago, has less segments than has the larva. In the bee, the first ring of the abdomen becomes the petiole, and the last three are merged into one, and thus the number of segmentsin the adult are only six. The dronehas one more. The spiraclesand ganglia are also reduced in number. Aristotle called pupz ‘‘ nymphs” —a name stillin use. The word nymph is now used to desig- nate the immature stages, both larval and pupal, of insects with incomplete transformations like locusts. Inside the pupa skin great changes are in progress, for either by modifying the larval organs or developing parts entirely new by use of the accumulated material stored by the larva during its pro- 100 THH BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; longed banquet, the wonderful transformation from the siug- gish, worm-like larva, to the active, bird-like imago is accom- plished. Sometimes the pupa is surrounded by a silken cocoon, eithersthick, as the cocoon of some moths, or thin and incomplete as the cocoon of bees. The cocoon is spun by moy- ing the head back and forth. The liquid thread quickly dries, andis drawn forth as the head moves. These cocoons are Fic. 39. Development of the Bee, after Duncan. ab Eggs. q Pupa. ede f Larve. k Caps. i Queen-cell. spun by the larve as their last toil before assuming the restful pupa state. The length of time in the pupa stage varies from a few days toas many months. Sometimes insects which are two-brooded remain as pupa but a few days in summer, while in winter they are moths passing the quiescent period. Our cabbage-butterfly illustrates this peculiarity. Others, like the Hessian-fly and coddling-moth, remain through the long, cold months as larve. How wonderful is this! The first brood of OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 101 larve change to pupe at once, the last brood, though’ the weather be just as hot, wait over inside the cocoon till the warm days of coming spring. THE IMAGO STAGE, This term refers to the last or winged form (Fig. 40), and was given by Linnzus because the image of the insect is now Fic. 41. Queen-Bee, magnified.—Original. Bee-Egg.—Original. A Egg. B Large end. m Micropyle. realand not masked as when in the larva state. Now the insect has its full-formed legs and wings, its compound eyes, often complex mouth-parts—a few insects, like the bot-flies, have no mouth organs—and the fully developed sex-organs. In fact, the whole purpose of the insect now seems to be to reproduce itself. Many insects do not even eat, only flit in merry marriage mood for a brief space, when the male flees this life to be quickly followed by the female, she only wait. ing to place her eggs where the prospective infants may find suitable food. Some insects not only place their eggs, but feed and care for their young, as do ants, wasps and bees. Again, as in case of some species of ants and bees, abortive 102 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; females perform all, or most, of the labor in cating for the young. The life of the imago also varies much as to duration. Some imagos live but for a day. others make merry for several days, while a few species live formonths. Very few imagos survive the whole year. The queen-bee may live for five years, and Lubbock has queen-ants which are fifteen or more years old. INCOMPLETE TRANSFORMATION. Some insects like the bugs, lice, grasshoppers, and locusts, are quite alike at all stages of growth, after leaving the egg. The only apparent difference is the smaller size and the absence or incomplete development of the wings in the larve and pupe. The larva and pupa are known as nymphs. The habits and structure from first to last seem to be much the same. Here, as before, the full development of the sex-corgans occurs only in the imago. ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF THE HONEY-BEE. Witha knowledge of the anatomy and some glimpses of the physiology of insects in general, we shall now find it easy tolearn the special anatomy and physiology of the highest insects of the order. THREE KINDS OF BEES IN KACH FAMILY. As we have already seen, a very remarkable feature in the economy of the honey-bee, described even by Aristotle, which is true of some other bees, and of ants, is the presence in each family of three distinct kinds, which differ in form, color, structure, size, habits and function. Thus, we have the queen (Lubbock has shown that there are several queens in an ant colony), a number of drones, and a far greater number of workers. Huber, Bevan, Munn, and Kirby, also speak of a fourth kind, blacker than the usual workers. These are accidental, and are, as conclusively shown by Baron von Ber- lepsch, ordinary workers, more deeply colored by age, loss of hair, dampness, or some other atmospheric condition. Ameri- can apiarists are too familiar with these black bees, for after our severe winters they prevailin thecolony, and, as remarked OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 103 by the noted Baron, ‘‘They quickly disappear.” Munn also tells of a fifth kind, with a top-knot, which appears at swarm- ing seasons. I am ata great loss to know what he refers to, unless it be the pollen-masses of the asclepias, or milk-weed, which sometimes fasten to our bees and become a severe burden. THE QUHEN-BEE. The queen (Fig. 40), although referred to as the mother- bee, was called the king by Virgil, Pliny, and by writers as late as the last century, though in the ‘‘ Ancient Bee-Master’s Farewell,’? by John Keyes, published in London in 1796, I find an admirable description of the queen-bee, with her function correctly stated. Reaumur, as quoted in ‘‘ Wildman on Bees,”’ published in London in 1770, says, ‘‘ This third sort hasa grave and sedate walk, is armed with a sting, and is mother of all others.”’ Huber, to whom every apiarist owes so much, and who, though blind, through the aid of his devoted wife and intelli- gent servant, Francis Burnens, developed so many interesting truths, demonstrated the fact of the queen’s maternity. This author’s work, second edition, published in Edinburgh in 1808, gives a full history of his wonderful observations and experi- ments, and must ever rank with the work of Langstroth asa classic, worthy of study by all. The queen, then, is the mother-bee; in other words, a fully developed female. Her ovaries (Fig. 38, 0,0) are very large, nearly filling her long abdomen. The tubes, already described as composing them, are very numerous, there being more than one hundred, while the spermatheca (Fig. 38, s 6)is plainly visible. This isa membranous sac, hardly 1-20 of an inch in diameter. It is fairly covered with interlacing nerves, which give to it its light, glistening appearance. ‘The sper- matheca has a short duct, joined to whichis the duct of the double appendicular glands which closely embrace the sper- matheca. These are described by Siebold and lLeuckart, who suppose that they furnish mucus to render the sperm-cells more mobile, so that they will move more freely. Leuckart also describes muscles, which connect with the duct of the 104 THE BEE-KEEPER'S GUIDE; spermatheca (Fig. 38), which he thinks act as sphincters or dilators of this duct, to restrain or permit the passage of the spermatozoa. When the duct is opened the ever-active sperm- cells rush out, aided in their course by the secretion from the appended glands. The spermatheca, according to Leuckart, may contain 25,000,000 spermatozoa. We see, then, why it does not run Fic. 43. Fic. 42. Labium of Queen.—Oriyinal, a Ligula. dd Paraglosse. b Labial palpi. Part of Leg of Queen, magnified, after Duncan. t Tibia. p Broadened tibia and basal tarsus. ts Tarsal joints. empty, even though Siebold thought that each of the one and one-half million of eggs that a queen may lay, receives two or three sperm-cells. I think it is now proved that but one sperm- cellenters each egg. The eggs, which, as Girard states, do not form as early in the ovaries as do the sperm-cells in the organs of the drone, which are matured while the drone is yet OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. ¢ 105 a pupa, area little more than 1-16 of an inch long, slightly curved, and rather smaller at the end of attachment to the comb. The outer membrane (Fig. 41) appears cellular when magnified, and shows the micropyle at the larger end (Fig. 41, B,m). The possession of the ovaries and attendant organs is the chief structural peculiarity which marks the queen, as . these are the characteristic marks of females among all ani- mals. But she has other peculiarities worthy of mention: She is longer than either drones or workers, being more than Fic. 44. Diagram of Abdomen of Queen, from Cowan. F Ovaries. Rectum. St Sting. M Honey stomach, N sophagus. A Anus. D Stomach. Ss Sheath, V Oviduct. seven-eighths of an inch in length, and with her long, tapering "* abdomen, is not without real grace and beauty. The queen’s mouth organs are developed to a less degree than are those of the worker-bees. Her jaws (Fig. 65, 6) or mandibles are weaker, witha rudimentary tooth, and her tongue or ligula (Fig. 42, u, and 49), as also the labial palpi (Fig. 42, 6,and 49) and maxille, are considerably shorter. Of the four pairs of glands (Fig. 59) so elegantly figured, and so well described by Schiemenz, the queen has the first pair very rudimentary, and the others well developed. The fourth pair, or Wolff’s glands, are much larger than in the worker-bees. Her eyes, though like, yet hardly as large as the same in the worker-bee (Fig. 4), are smaller 106 THE BEE-KEEPER'S GUIDE} than those of the drones, and do not meet above. So the three ocelli are situated above and between the compound eyes. The queen's wings (Fig. 40) are relatively shorter than those of either the workers or drones, for instead of attaining to the end of the body, they reach but little beyond the third joint of ‘the Abdomen. The queen, though she has the characteristic posterior tibia and basal tarsus (Fig. 43, #) in respect to breadth, has not the cavity and surrounding hairs which form the pollen-baskets of the workers. The legsof the queen (Fig. 43) are large and strong, but, like her body, they have not the pollen-gathering hairs which are so well marked in the worker. The queen possesses a sting which islonger than that of the worker, and resembles that of the bumble-bee in being curved (Fig. 44, Ss), and that of the bumble-bees and wasps in having few and short barbs—the little projections which point back like the barb of a fish-hook, and which, in case of the workers, prevent the withdrawing of the instrument, when once fairly inserted. While there are seven quite prominent barbs on each shaft of the worker's sting (Fig. 74), there are only three on those of the queen, and these are very short. As in case of the barbs of the worker's sting, so here, they are successively shorter as we recede from the point of the weapon. Even Aristotle discovered that a queen will rarely use her sting. I have often tried to get a queen to sting me, but without suc- cess. Neighbour gives three cases where queens used their stings, in one of which she was disabled from farther egg- laying. She stings with slight effect. The use of the queen’s sting is todispatch a rival queen. The brain of the queen is relatively small. We should expect this, as the queen’s func-— tions are vegetative. So the worker, possessed of more intri- cate functions, is much more highly organized. Figure 44 gives the relation of the viscera of the queen. Schiemenz and Schonfeld are unquestionably correct in the belief that the queen, and the drones as well, are fed by the workers, the same food that the larvze are fed. Thus, the digestion is performed for both queen and drones. I have known queens to lay over 3,000eggsaday. These I find weigh .3900 grams, while the queen only weighs .2299 grams. Thus, the queen may lay daily nearly double her own OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 107 weight of eggs. This, of course, could only be possible as she was fed highly nutritious food, which was wholly digested for her. The larval bee fed the same food doubles in weight in a single day—a further proof of the excellence of this diet. Schonfeld finds that the queen, like the drones, will soon die if she be shut away from the workers by a double wire-cage, even though in the hive and surrounded with honey. The fact that pollen-husks—cuticula—are never found in the queen’s stomach, gives added proof of the above fact. The contents are grayish. I never saw a queen void her feces. Vogel reports having seen it, and Mr. Cowan reports to me that he has seen a queen pass a yellowish gray liquid. We also find the queen’s alimentary canal comparatively small, though the renal tubules are large and numerous. The queen, like the worker-bees, is developed from an impregnated egg, which, of course, could only come from a queen that had previously mated. These eggs are not placed ina horizontal cell, but in one specially prepared for their reception (Fig. 39, 7z). The queen-cells (Fig. 45) are usually built on the edge of the comb, or around an opening in it, which is necessitated from their size and form, as usually the combs are too close together to permit their location elsewhere. These cells extend either vertically or diagonally downward, are very rough (Fig. 45, c), and are composed of wax cut from the old combs, mixed with pollen (Mr. Cheshire says all kinds of refuse is used in con- structing queen-cells), and in size and form much resemble a peanut. The eggs must be placed in these cells, either by the queen or workers. Huber, who, though blind, had wondrous eyes, witnessed this act of the queen. I have frequently seen eggs in these cells, and without exception in the exact position in which the queen always places her eggs in the other cells. John Keyes, in the old work already referred to, whose descrip- tions, though penned so long ago, are wonderfully accurate, and indicate great care, candor, and conscientious truthfulness, asserts that the queen is five times as long laying a royal egg as she is the others. From the character of his work, and its early publication, Ican but think that he had witnessed this rare sight. Some candid apiarists of our own time and coun- try—E. Gallup among the rest—claim to have witnessed the 108 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE ; same. Theeggs are so well glued, and are so delicate, that, with Neighbour, I should doubt the possibility of a removal except that some persons assert that they have positive proof that it is sometimes done. Possibly the young larvae may at times be removed from one cell to another. The opponents to the view that the queen lays eggs in the queen-cells, base their belief on a supposed discord between the queen and neuters. The conditions which lead tothe building of queen-cells, and the peopling of the same are: Loss of queen ; when a worker-larva from one to four days old will be surrounded by acell; inability of a queen to lay impregnated eggs, her sper- matheca having become emptied ; any disability of the queen ; great number of worker-bees in the hive; restricted quarters, the queen not having place to deposit eggs, or the workers little or no room to store honey; or lack of ventilation, so that the hive bécomes too close. These last three conditions are most likely to occur at times of great nectar-secretion. A queen may be developed from an egg, or, as first shown by Schirach, from a worker-larva less than three days old. (Mr Doolittle has known queens to be reared from worker- larve taken at four-and a-half days from hatching.) In such cases the cells adjacent to the one containing the selected larva are removed, and the larva surrounded bya royal cell. The development of the queen-larva is much like that of the worker, soon to be detailed, except thatit is more rapid, and the queen-larva is fed richer and more plenteous food, called royal jelly. Thisis an excellent name for this substance, as Dr. A. de Planta has shown (B. B. J., 1887, p. 185) that this royal jelly is different from the food both of the worker and drone larva. It is doubtless digested pollen, as first suggested by Dufour, and so ably proved by Schonfeld. I have fed bees honey with finely pulverized charcoal in it, and found the same in the royal jelly. This could not be true if the latter were a secretion, as the carbon is not osmotic. Dr. Planta’s re- searches show that the royal jelly is richer in fatty elements and proteids than the larval food either of the drones or workers; but not as rich in sugar. It contains more albumi- nous material,and much more fatty matter than the food of the drone-larve. Quite likely evaporation may change the OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 109 nature of this royal jelly. There is never undigested food fed to queen or worker larva, but the drone-larva is thus fed, as the microscope shows the pollen. This peculiar food, as also its use and abundance in the cell, was first described by Schirach, aSaxon clergyman, who wrote a work on bees in 1771. It is thick, like rich cream; slightly yéllow, and so abundant that the queen-larva not only floatsin it during all its period of growth, but quite a large amount remains after her queenship vacates the cell. We sometimes find this royal jelly in incomplete queen-cells, without larve. What a mysterious circumstance is this: These royal scions simply receive a more abundant and nutritious diet, and occupy a more ample habitation—for I have more than once confirmed the statement of Mr. Quinby, that the direction of the cell is immaterial—and yet what a marvelous transfor- mation. Not only are the ovaries developed and filled with eggs, but the mouth organs, the wings, the legs, the sting, aye, even the size, form, and habits, are all wondrously changed. The food stimulates extra development of the ovaries, and, through the law of compensation, other parts are less developed. That the development of parts should be accelerated, and the size increased, is not so surprising—as in breeding other insectsI have frequently found that kind and amount of food would hasten or retard growth, and might even cause a dwarfed imago—but that food should so essentially modify the structure, is certainly a rare and unique circum- stance, hardly to be found except here and in related animals. Bevan has suggested that laying workers, while larve, have received some of this royal jelly from their posi- tion near a developing queen. As the workers vary the food for the several larve, as Dr. Planta has shown, may they not sometimes make a mistake and feed royal jelly to workers ? Surely, in caring for so many young, this would be very par- donable. Langstroth supposes that they receive sone royal jelly, purposely given by the workers, and I have previously thought this reasonable and probably true. But these pests of the apiarist, and especially of the breeder, almost always, so far as I have observed, make their appearance in colonies long queenless, and I have noticed a case similar to that given 110 THE BEE-KEREPER’S GUIDE; by Quinby, where these occurredin a nucleus where no queen had been developed. May it not be true thata desire for eggs or unrest stimulates in some worker, which was perhaps over-ted as a larva, the growth of the ovaries, growth of eggs in the ovarian tubes, and consequent ability to deposit? The common high-holder, Colaptes auratus—a bird belonging to the wood-pecker order, usually lays five eggs, and only five; but let cruel hands rob her of these promises of future loved ones, and, wondrous to relate, she continues to lay more than a score. One thus treated, on the College campus, actually laid more than thirty eggs. So we see that animal desires may influence and move organs that are generally independent of the will. It may be that in queenless colonies the workers commence to feed some worker or workers, the rich nitrogen- ous food, and thus their ovaries are stimulated to activity. The larval queen is longer, and more rapid of development than the other larve. When developed from the egg—as in case of normal swarming—the larva feeds for five days, when the cell is capped by the workers. At any time during this period the larva can be removed, as first shown by Mr. J. L. Davis, of Michigan, in 1874, anda newly hatched larva placed in it instead. This is easily done by use of a quill tooth- pick. The infant queen then spins her cocoon, which occupies about one day. The fibrous part of the cocoon, which is also true of both drone and worker larve, is confined to the outer end, as is easily seen by microscopic examination. Yet a thin varnish continues this over the whole interior of the cell. This latter becomes very thick in worker-cells, as many bees are reared in each cell, while in the queen-cell it is thin, as but one bee is reared in each cell. A similar varnish coats the cocoons of all silk-moths. This may be the contents of the alimentary canal simply, which, of course, is moulted with the last larval skin, very likely a special secretion is added. These cocoons are shown nicely when we melt old combin the solar wax-extractor. The queen now spends nearly three daysin absolute repose. Such rest is common to all cocoon-spinning larve. The spinning, which is done by a rapid motion to-and- fro of the head, always carrying the delicate thread, much like the moving shuttle of the weaver, seems to bring exhaustion OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 111 and need of repose. She now assumes the pupa state (Fig. 39,7). At the end of the sixteenth day she comes forth a queen. Ashort time before the queen emerges the workers thin off the wax from the end of the cell (Fig. 45, D). The reason for this is obscure, as the queen could easily come forth without it. The queen cuts her way out by use of her jaws, and leaves the cap hanging as a lid to the cell (Fig. 45, C). wens a5 — cK Queen-Cells, from A. I. Root Co. A Queen-cell from modified worker-cell just started. B Imcomplete cell. C Cell, after queen has emerged, showing cap hanging. D Thinned cell, # Cell cut into from side. While a queen usually comes forth in sixteen days, there may beadelay. Cold will delay hatching of the egg, and retard development. Sometimes queens are kept fora time in the cell, after they are really ready to come forth. Thus, there may be rarely a delay of even two days. Huber states that when a queen emerges the bees are thrown into a joyous excitement, so that he noticed a rise in temperature in the hive from 92 degrees IF. to 104 degrees F. I have never tested this matter accurately, but I have failed to notice any marked 112 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE, demonstration on the natal day of her ladyship the queen, or extra respect paid her asa virgin. When queens are started from worker-larve they will issue as imagoes in ten or twelve days from the date of their new prospects. Mr. Doolittle writes me that he hasknown them to issue in eight and one- half days. My own observations sustain the assertion of Mr. P. Ll. Viallon, that the minimum time is nine and one-half days. As the queen’s development is probably due to superior quality and increased quantity of food, it would stand to reason that queens started from eggs, or larve just hatched, are preferable ; the more so as, under normal circumstances, I believe they are almost always thus started. The best experience sustains this position. As the proper food and temperature can best be securedin a full colony—and here again the natural economy of the hive adds to our argument— we should infer that the best queens would be reared in strong colonies, or at least kept in such colonies till the cells were capped. Experience alsoconfirms this view. As the quantity and quality of food and the general activity of the bees are directly connected with the full nourishment of the queen- larva, and as these are only at the maximum in times of active gathering—the time when queen-rearing is naturally started by the bees—we should also conclude that queens reared at such seasons are superior. My experience—and I have carefully observed in this connection—most emphatically sustains this view. Five or six days after issuing from the cell—Neighbour says the third day—if the day is pleasant the queen goes forth on her “‘ marriage flight ;’’ otherwise she will improve the first pleasant day thereafter for this purpose. Mr. Doolittle says that mid-summer queens fly out in from four to nine days, while early spring and fall queens may not mate for from two to four weeks. Rev. Mr. Mahin has noticed, as have many of us, that the young queens fly out several times simply to exer- cise, and then he thinks they often go from two to five miles to mate; while Mr. Alley thinks the mating is performed within one-half mile of the hive. I have known queens to be out on their mating tour for thirty-five minutes, in which case it OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 113 would seem certain that they must have gone more than one- half mile. It has been reported by reliable persons that the queens are out from ten minutes to two hours. Sometimes queens will meet drones, as shown by the white thread tipping the body, and yet not be impregnated. The spermatozoa did not reach the spermatheca. In such cases, a second, and per- haps a third, mating is required. Huber was the first to prove that impregnation always takes place on the wing. Bonnet also proved that the same is true of ants, though in this case millions of queens and drones often swarm out atonce. I have myself witnessed several of these wholesale matrimonial excursions among ants. I have also taken bumble-bees that were copulating while on the wing. I havealso seen both ants and bumble-bees fall while united, probably borne down by the expiring males. That butterflies, moths, dragon-fles, etc., mate on the wing is a matter of common observation. It has generally been thought impossible for queens in confine- ment to be impregnated. Prof. Leuckart believes that suc- cessful mating demands that the large air-sacs (Fig. 1, /) of the drones shall be filled, which he thinks is only possible during flight. The demeanor of the drones suggests that the excitement of flight, like the warmth of the hand, is necessary to induce the sexual impulse. Many others, with myself, have followed Huber in clip- ping the virgin queen’s wing, only to produce a sterile, or drone-laying queen. One queen, however, whose wing was clipped just as she came from the cell, and the entrance to whose hive was guarded by perforated zinc so the queen could not get out, was impregnated, and proved an excellent queen. I should doubt this if I could see any other way to explain it. Yet, from a great number of experiments, I feel sure that mating in confinement can never be made practical, even if desirable. And if Leuckart is correctin the above sugges- tion, which is very probable, it is not desirable. Some bee- keepers claim to have mated queens by hand. I have tried this thoroughly, as also mating in boxes, green-houses, etc., and from entire lack of successI believe such mating is im- possible, at least with most bee-keepers. J. S. Davitte, of Georgia, claims to have mated many queens in a large circu- 114 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; lar tent. The drones are permitted to fly only in the tent, and so are at home. If the queen fails to find an admirer the first day, she will go forth again and again till she succeeds. Huber states that after twenty-one days the case is hopeless. Bevan states that if impregnated from the fifteenth to the twenty-first she will be largely a drone-laying queen. That suchabsolute dates can be fixed in either of the above cases is very questionable. Yet all experienced breeders know that queens kept through the winter as virgins are sure to remain so. It is quite likely that the long inactivity of the reproductive apparatus, especially of the oviduct and spermatheca, wholly or in part paralyzes it, so that queens that are late in mating can not impregnate the eggs as they desire. This would accord with what we know of other muscular organs. Berlepsch believed that a queen that commenced laying as a virgin could never lay impregnated eggs, even though she afterwards mated. Langstroth thought that he had observed to the contrary. If the queen be observed after a successful ‘‘ wedding tour,’’ she will be seen as first pointed out by Huber, to bear the marks of success in the pendant drone appendages, which are still heldin the vulva of the queen. It is not at all likely that a queen, after she has meta drone, ever leaves the hive again except when she leaves with aswarm. It has been stated that an old queen may be im- pregnated. I feel very certain that this is an error. If the queen lays eggs before meeting the drone, or if for any reason she fail to mate, her eggs will only produce male bees. This strange anomaly—development of the eggs with- out impregnation—was discovered and proved by Dzierzon, in 1845. Dr. Dzierzon, who, asa student of practical and scien- tific apiculture, ranks very high, is a Roman Catholic priest of Carlsmarkt,Germany. This doctrine—called parthenogenesis, which means produced from a virgin—is still doubted by some quite able bee-keepers, though the proofs are irrefragable: Ist. Unmated queens will lay eggs that will develop, but drones always result. 2d. Old queens often become drone-layers, but examina- tion shows that the spermatheca is void ofseminal fluid. Such OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 115 an examination was first made by Prof. Siebold, the great German anatomist, in 1843, and later by Leuckart and Leidy. I have myself made several such examinations. The sperma- theca can easily be seen by the unaided vision, and by crush- ing it on a glass slide, by compressing with a thin glass cover, the difference between the contained fluid in the virgin and in the impregnated queen is very patent, even with a low power. In the latter it is more viscid and yellow, and the vesicle more distended. By use of a high power, the active spermatozoa or sperm-cells (Fig. 50) become visible. ‘ 3d. Eggs in drone-cells are found by the microscopist to be void of the sperm-cells, which are always found in all other fresh-laid eggs. This most convincing and interesting obser- vation was first made by Von Siebold, at the suggestion of Berlepsch. It is quite dificult to show this. Leuckart tried before Von Siebold, at Berlepsch’s apiary, but failed. I have also tried to discover these sperm-cells in worker-eggs, but as yet have been unsuccessful. Siebold has noted the same facts ineggs of wasps. 4th. Dr. Donhoff, of Germany, reports that, in 1855, he took an egg from a drone-cell, and by artificial impregnation produced a worker-bee. Late investigation by Mr. Weismann, of Germany, leaves no doubt of this fact of parthenogenesis in the production of drone-bees. Parthenogenesis, in the production of males, has also been found by Siebold to be true of other bees and wasps, and of some of the lower moths in the production of both males and females. Adler has shown that this agamic reproduction pre- vails among the Chalcidide, a family of parasitic Hymenop- tera, and it has long been known to characterize the cynips or gall-flies ; while the great Bonnet first discovered what may be noticed on any summer day all about us, even on the house- plants at our very windows, that parthenogenesis is best illus- trated by the aphides, or plant lice. In the fall males and females appear which mate, when the females lay eggs which in the spring produce only females; these again produce only females, and thus on for several generations, sometimes fifteen or twenty, till with the cold of autumn come again the males 116 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE} and females. Any person can easily demonstrate this fact for himself. The summer plant-lice are hatched within the mother-louse, or are ovoviviparous. It is easy to capture a young louse just as it is born, and isolate it on a plant, when soon we shall find it giving birth to young lice, though it has never even seen any louse, male or female, since birth. Bon- net observed seven successive generations of productive vir- gins. Duval noted nine generations in seven months, while Kyber observed production exclusively by parthenogenesis in a heated room for four years. So we see that this strange and almost incredible method of increase is not rare in the great insect world. In two or three days after she is impregnated, the queen, under normal circumstances, commences to lay, usually worker-eggs. It is rare not to find eggs by the tenth day from the birth of the queen. The queens rarely go three weeks before laying. Such tardiness does not recommend them. It is reported that giving unhatched brood will start the queen to laying. If this be true, it is doubtless explained by her receiving different food from the workers. If the con- dition of the hive impels to no further swarming that season, no drones will be required, and so only worker-eggs will be laid. In many localities, and in certain favorable years in all localities, however, further swarming will occur. It is frequently noticed that the young queen at first lays quite a number of drone-eggs. Queen-breeders often observe this in their nuclei. This continues for only a few days. This does not seem strange. The act of freeing the sperm-cells from the spermatheca is muscular and voluntary, and that these muscles should not always act promptly at first,is not strange, nor is it unprecedented. Mr. Wagner suggested that the size of the cell determined the sex, as in the small cells the pressure on the abdomen forced the fluid from the sperma- theca. Mr. Quinby also favored this view. I greatly question this theory. All observing apiarists have known eggs to be laid in worker-cells ere they were hardly commenced, when there could be no pressure. In case of queen-cells, too, if the queen does lay the eggs—as I believe—these would be unim- pregnated, as thecellis very large. I know the queen some- OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 117 times passes from drone to worker cells very abruptly while laying, as Ihave witnessed such a procedure—the same that so greatly rejoiced the late Baron of Berlepsch, after weary hours of watching—but that she can thus control at the in- stant this process of adding or withholding the sperm-cells certainly seems not so strange as that the spermatheca, hardly bigger than a pin-head, could supply these cells for months, yes, and for years. Who that has seen the bot-fly dart against the horse’s legs, and as surely leave the tiny yellow egg, can doubt but that insects possess very sensitive oviducts, and can extrude the minute eggs just at pleasure. That a queen may force single eggs at will, past the mouth of the spermatheca, andat the same time add or withhold the sperm-cells, is, I think, without question true. What gives added force to this view is the fact that other bees, wasps and ants exercise the same volition, and can have no aid from cell-pressure, as all the eggs are laid in receptacles of the same size. As already remarked, the males and workers of Apis dorsata are developed in the same sized cells, while the malesof A. indica are smaller than the workers. The Baron of Berlepsch, worthy to bea ‘friend of Dzierzon, has fully decided the matter. He hasshown that old drone-cells are as small as new worker-cells, and each harbors its own brood. Very small queens, too, make no mis- takes. With no drone-cells, the queen will sometimes lay drone-eggs in worker-cells, in which drones will then be reared, and she will, if she must, though with great reluctance, lay worker-eggs in drone-cells. Before laying an egg the queen takes a look into the cell, probably to see if allis right. If the cell contains any honey, pollen, or an egg, she usually passes it by, though, when crowded, a queen will sometimes, especially if young, insert two or three eggs ina cell, and sometimes, when in such cases she drops them, the bees show their dislike of waste, and appreciation of good living, by making a breakfast of them. If the queen find the cell to her liking, she turns about, inserts her abdomen, and in an instant the tiny egg is glued in posi- tion (Fig. 39, 6) to the bottom of the cell. The queen, when considered in relation to the other bees of the colony, possesses a surprising longevity. It is not un- 118 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; common for her to attain the age of three years in the full possession of her powers, while queens have been known to do good work for five years. Lubbock has queen ants in his nests that are fifteen or more years old, and stiil they are vigorous layers. Queens, often at the expiration of one, two, three or four years, depending on their vigor and excellence, either cease to be fertile, or else become impotent to lay im- pregnated eggs—the spermatheca having become emptied of its sperm-cells. In such cases the workers usually supersede the queen, that is, they rear a new queen before all the worker- eggs are gone, and then destroy the old one. It sometimes happens, though rarely, that a fine looking queen, with the full-formed ovaries and large spermatheca well filled with male fluid, will deposit freely, but none of the eggs will hatch. Readers of bee-papers know that I have frequently received such for dissection. I received one Aug. 12, 1900, from Mr. E. R. Root. The first one I ever got wasa remarkably fine looking Italian, received from the late Dr. Hamlin, of Tennessee. All such queens that I have examined seem perfect, even though scrutinized with a high-power objective. Wecan only say that the egg is at fault,as fre- quently transpires with higher animals, even to the highest. These females are barren; through some fault with the ovaries, the eggs grown therein are sterile. To detect just what is the trouble with the egg is a very difficult problem, if it is capable of solution at all. I have tried to determine the ultimate cause, but without success. Cases have also been observed where mated and impregnated queens fail to lay impregnated eggs. Here the delicate organism of the sperma- theca and its duct is at fault. Queens that have been chilled, as shown by Siebold, Leuckart, and our own Langstroth, are often made drone-layers—that is, they lay only unimpregnated eggs. Ihave also had one queen that produced many her- maphroditic bees. These hermaphrodites are not really her- maphrodites; as, so faras I have examined, they have only ovaries or testes, but externally they have drone-organs in part, as, for instance, the appendages of the head and thorax ; and worker-organs in part, as the abdomen, will be like that of a drone. Indeed, I now have a very strange hermaphrodite, OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 119 where one side is worker, the other drone. It is very probable that these peculiarities arise from a diseased condition of the queen, or else from diseased spermatozoa. I have known one queen, many of whose bees were thus abnormal. If a queen is not impregnated for three or four weeks, she often com- mences to lay without impregnation, and then is a ‘‘ drone- layer,’’ and, of course, worthless. She may lay as regularly as if impregnated, though this is not usual. She is, of course, betrayed by the higher cappings, and exclusive drone-brood. The function of the queen is simply to lay eggs, and thus keep the colony populous, and this she does with an energy that is fairly startling. A good queen in her best estate will lay two or three thousand eggsa day. I have seen a queen in my observing hive lay for some time at the rate of four eggs per minute, and have proved by actual computation of brood- cells that a queen may lay over three thousand eggsin a day. Both Langstroth and Berlepsch saw queens lay at the rate of sixeggsa minute. The latter had a queen that laid three thousand and twenty-one eggs in twenty-four hours, by actual count, and in twenty days she laid fifty-seven thousand. This queen continued prolific for five years, and must have laid, says the Baron, at a low estimate, more than 1,300,000 eggs. ‘Dzierzon says queens may lay 1,000,000 eggs, and I think these authors have not exaggerated. As already stated,a queen may lay nearly double her weight of eggs daily. Yet, with even these figures as an advertisement, the queen-bee can not boast of superlative fecundity, as the queen white-ant—an insect closely related to the bees in habits, though not in struc- ture, as the white-ants are lace-wings, and belong to the order Neuroptera (Isoptera), which includes our day-flies, dragon-flies, etc.—is known to lay over 80,000 eggs daily. Yet this poor, helpless thing, whose abdomen is the size of a man’s thumb, and composed almost wholly of eggs, while the rest of her pody is no larger than the same in our common ants, has no other amusement; she can not walk; she can not even feed herself, or care for her eggs. What wonder then that she should attempt big things in the way of egg-laying ? She has nothing else to do, or to feel proud of. Different queens vary as much in fecundity as do different 120 THE BRE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; kinds of life. Some queens are so prolific that they fairly demand hives of India rubber to accommodate them, keeping their hives gushing with bees and profitable activity; while others are so inferior that the colonies make a poor, sickly effort tosurvive at all, and usually succumb early, before the adverse circumstances which are ever waiting to confront all life on the globe. This lack of fecundity may be due to dis- ease, improper development, or to special race or strain. This fact promises rich fruit to the careful, persistent breeder. The activity of the queen is governed largely by the activity of the workers. The queen will either lay sparingly, or stop altogether, in the interims of storing honey, while, on the other hand, she is stimulated to lay to her utmost capacity when all is life and activity in the hive. As the worker-bees feed the laying queen, it is more than probable that with no nectar to gather, the food is withheld, and so the queen is unable to produce the eggs which demanda great amount of nutritious food all ready to be absorbed. Thus, the whole mat- ter is doubtless controlled by the workers. This refusal to lay when nectar is wanting does not hold true, apparently, with the Cyprian and Syrian bees. The old poetical notion that the queen is the revered and admired sovereign of the colony, whose pathway is ever lined by obsequious courtiers, whose person is ever the recipient of loving caresses, and whose willis law in this bee-hive king- dom, controlling all the activities inside the hive, and leading the colony whithersoever it may go, is unquestionably mere fiction. Inthe hive, as in the world, individuals are valued for what they are worth. The queen, as the most important individual, is regarded with solicitude, and her removal or loss is noted with consternation, as the welfare of the colony is threatened ; yet, let the queen become useless, and she is dis- patched with the same absence of emotion that characterizes the destruction of the drones when they have become super- numeraries. It is very doubtful if emotion and sentimentality are ever moving forces among the lower animals. There are probably certain natural principles that govern in the economy of the hive, and anything that conspires against, or tends to intercept, the action of these principles, becomes an enemy to OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 121 the bees. Allare interested, and doubtless more united than is generally believed, ina desire to promote the free action of these principles. No doubt the principle of antagonism among the various bees has been overrated. Even the drones, when they are being killed off in the autumn, make a sickly show of defense, as much as to say, the welfare of the colony demands that such worthless vagrants should be exterminated. How relentlessly the bees drag out even the worker-bees that have become loaded with the pollen-masses of milkweed, or other- wise disabled. Such bees are of no more use, and useless members are not tolerated in the bee-community. It is most probable that what tends most for the prosperity of the colony is well understood by all, and without doubt there is harmo- nious action among all the denizens of the hive to foster that which will advance the general welfare, or to make war on whatever may tend to interfere with it. If the course of any of the bees seems wavering and inconsistent, we may rest assured that circumstances have changed, and that could we perceive the bearing of all the surrounding conditions, all would appear consistent and harmonious. The holding of young queens in the cells, and guarding them, seems an exception. THE DRONKS. These are the male bees, and are generally foundin the hive only from May to November, though they may remain all winter, and are not infrequently absent during the summer. Their presence or absence depends upon the present and pros- pective condition of the colony. If they are needed, or likely to be needed, then they are present. There are in nature sev- eral hundred, and often thousands, in each colony. The num- ber may and should be greatly reduced by the apiarist. The drones (Figs. 46, 47) are shorter than the queen, being less than three-fourths of an inch in length, and are more robust and bulky than either the queen or workers. The drones weigh about 1-2000 of a pound, while the workers only weigh 1-5000. They are easily recognized, when flying, by their loud, startling hum. Asin other societies, the least useful make the most noise. This loud hum would seem to becaused by the less 122 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; rapid vibration of their large, heavy wings. Jandois showed many years since, that the hum of bees and other insects, was due first to vibrations of wings, secondly to vibrations of the abdominal rings, and, thirdly, to what he styled true voice in the thoracic spiracles, where there are cavities which he thought were voice cavities. He thought the humming tone of bees and other insects came from the spiracles. The drone’s flight is more heavy and lumbering than that of the workers. Their ligula (Fig. 49), labial palpi and maxille—like the same Fic. 46. Fic. 48. (Original.) Fic. 47. Ny TS a Part of Leg of Drone, magnified, after Duncan. Drone-Bees, magnified, from ewman. in the queen-bee—are short, while their jaws (Fig. 65, a) pos- sess the rudimentary tooth, and are much the same in form as those of the queen, but are heavier, though not so strong as those of the workers. Their eyes (Figs. 3, 47) are very promi- nent, meet above, and thus the simple eyes are thrown for- OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 123 ward. The ommatidia, or simple eyes which form the com- pound eyes of the drone (Figs. 3, 47), are, as shown by Laco- daire, more than twice as numerous as those of either queen or worker. The drones also have longer and broader antennae, with far more of the olfactory cavities, though not so many tactile hairs as are found in the antennz of the workers. Entomologists now believe that the better sight and smell, as also the large wings, are very useful tothe drone. They make success more probable, as the drone flies forth with hundreds of other drones in questof a mate. We can alsosee how, through the law of natural selection, all these peculiarities are con- Fic. 49. Heads of Worker, Queen and Drone, showing comparative length of Tongues, from Cowan. A Worker. B Queen. C Drone, stantly strengthened. Their posterior legs are convex on the outside (Fig. 48), so, like the queens, they have no pollen- baskets. As we should expect, the branching hairs, both on the body and legs, are almost absentin drones ; what there are are coarse, and probably aid in mating. The drones are with- out the defensive organ, having no sting, while their special sex-organs (Fig. 37) are very interesting. These have been fully described and illustrated by Leuckart. The testes are situated in the abdomen, in an analogous position to that of the ovaries in the queen. Like these organs in higher ani- mals, there are in each testis hundreds of tubes in which are developed the sperm-cellsin bundles. As Leuckart shows, the 124 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; testes are larger in the pupa than in the imago, for even then the spermatozoa have begun to descend to the versicule semi- nales (Fig. 37, c, c). Thus, in old drones, the testes have shrunken. The spermatozoa are very long, with a marked head (Fig. 50), which, as Mr. Cowan remarked to me, look like cat-tail flags, as there is a short, small projection beyond the head. These sperm-cells are so very small, and so long and slender, that itis difficult to isolate or trace them; hence, in microscopic preparations they look like one hopeless tangle (Fig. 50). It is incomprehensible how they can be separated Fic. 50. Spermetozva,—Original, and passed, one, two, or more at a time, by the queen as the eggs are to be impregnated. Appended to the versicule semi- nales (Fig. 37, c,c) just where they pass to the ejaculatory duct are two large glandular sacs (Fig. 37, d), which add mucus to the seminal fluid. The ejaculatory duct (Fig. 37, e) is rather long and very muscular. This passes to a pouch (Fig. 37,/), where the sperm-cells are massed, preparatory to coition. Leuckart called this mass of spermatozoa the spermatophore. This is what is passed to the spermatheca of the queen during coition. Below this is the organ proper. It has, as may be seen by pressing a drone, three pairs of appendages, somewhat horn-like, and certain roughness or pleats (Fig. 37, 2, 7), which serve to make connection more close during coition. These little barb-like teeth, rough projections and horns, as they are s OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 125 grasped and firmly pressed by the vulva or enlargement just at the end of the oviduct of the queen, are held as ina vice; and so we see why they are torn from the drone during coition. As Leuckart has so admirably described, the external organs of the drone are drawn up intothe so-called bean or sac (Fig. 37, /), as the finger of a glove, to use the words of Girard, often turns in as we draw the glove off the hand. As we pressa drone, or hold it in our warm hand as it has just returned from a long flight, when its air sacs are distended; or when it meets the queen, the sexual act is accomplished wholly or in part, and the external organ is everted or turned out as we turn the glove-finger out. Incase of coitus, this eversion is very com- plete, so that the bean or sac (Fig. 37, /) turns out, and the spermatophore is passed into the oviduct of the queen, and by her muscular oviduct pushed into the spermatheca. This seems a wonderful operation, almost beyond the possible. Yet the passage of the egg from the ovaries in higher animals is almost as surprising. Leuckart is undoubtedly correct in sug- gesting that for full and complete impregnation the drone needs tense muscles, full air sacs, and thus the vehement exercise on the wing is very important in the sexualact. If this be true, then impregnation of the queen in confinement is as undesirable as it seems to beexceptional. While it may not be absolutely necessary to have these conditions for impreg- nation, as I think I have positive proof, it doubtless is better, and usually necessary, that they exist. At this time the queen'sovaries are small, and thus her smaller size before impregnation. Hence, there is lack of high tension within the abdomen of the queen, which also tends to aid in the sex- ual act. The drone has not the wax-glands beneath the abdomen. On the ventral plates are scattering compound hairs, which doubtless haveimportance in the sexual act. The drone, like the queen, is without the lower head or pollen-digesting glands, and so is largely fed by the workers. Schonfeld has proved this by caging drones in full colonies. If cagedin a single- walled cage, soas to be accessible to the workers, they live; ifin a double-walled cage they all soon die, though all have abundant honey. While honey is necessary it is not enough. 126 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE ; It was discovered by Dzierzon in 1845, that the drones hatch from unimpregnatedeggs. This strange phenomenon, seemingly so incredible, is, as has been shown in speaking of the queen, easily proved and beyond question. These eggs may come from an unimpregnated queen, a laying worker— which will soon be described—or an impregnated queen which may voluntarily prevent impregnation. It isasserted by some that the workers can change a worker-egg to a drone-egg at will, When the workers are able to abstract the sperm-cells, which are so small that we can see them only by using a high- power microscope, then we may expect to see wheat turn to chess. Such eggs will usually be placed in the larger horizon- tal cells (Fig. 78, a), in manner already described. The drone-cells are one-fourth of an inch in diameter, and project beyond the worker-cells, so they are alittle more than one-half aninch long. Very rarely drones are produced in worker-cells. Such drones are diminutive, and undesirable in the apiary. As stated by Bevan, the drone feeds six anda half days as a larva before the cell is capped. As the micro- scope shows, undigested pollen is given to the drone-larve after the fourth day, which is not true of either the queen or worker. The capping of the drone-cells is very convex, and projects beyond the plane of the same in worker-cells, so that the drone-brood is easily distinguished from worker, and from the darker color—the wax being thicker and less pure—the capping of both drone and worker brood-cells enables us easily to distinguish them from honey-cells. In twenty-four days from the laying of the eggs, the drones come forth from the cells. Of course, variation of temperature and other condi- tions, as variable amount of diet, may slightly retard or ad- vance the development of any brood, in the different stages. The drones—in fact all bees—when they first emerge from the cells, are gray, and are easily distinguished from the mature bee. Just what the longevity of the male bee is, I am unable to state. It is probable, judging from analogy, that they live till accident, the worker-bees, or the performance of their natural function, cause their death. The worker-bees may kill off the drones at any time, which they do by constantly OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 127 biting and worrying them; though principally, I think, by withholding their albuminous food. They may also destroy the drone-brood. It is not very rare to see workers carrying out immature drones even in midsummer. At the same time they may destroy inchoate queens. Such action is prompted by a sudden check in the yield of honey, and in case of drones is common only at the close of the season. The bees seem very cautious and far-sighted. If the signs of the times pre- sage a famine, they stay all proceedings looking to the increase of colonies. On the other hand, nectar secretion by the flowers, rapid increase of brood, crowded quarters—whatever the age of the queen—are sure to bring many of the male bees, while any circumstances that indicate a need of drones in the near future, like loss or impotency of the queen, will prevent their destruction even in late autumn. The function of the drones is solely to impregnate the queen, though when present they add to the heat of the hive. Yet for this they were far better replaced by worker-bees. That their nutrition is active, is suggested by the fact that, upon dissection, we usually find their capacious honey-stomachs filled with honey. Impregnation of the queen always takes place, as before stated, while on the wing, outside the hive, usually during the heat of a warm, sunshiny day. After mating, as before sug- gested, the drone-organs adhere to the queen, and may be seen hanging to her for some hours. The copulatory act is fatal to the drone. By holding a drone just returned from a long flight in the hand, the ejection of the sex-organs is quickly produced, and is always followed by immediate death. As the queen meets only a single drone, and that only once, it might be asked why nature was so improvident as to decree hundreds of drones to an apiary or colony, whereas a score would suffice as well. Nature takes cognizance of the importance of the queen, and as she goes forth amidst the myriad dangers of the outer world, it is safest and best that her stay abroad be not protracted, that the experience be not repeated, and, especially, that her meeting a drone be not delayed. Hence, the super- abundance of drones—especially under natural conditions, isolated in forest homes, where ravenous birds are ever on the 128 THE BEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE; alert for insect game—is most wise and provident. Nature is never ‘‘penny wise and pound foolish.’”’ In our apiaries the need is wanting, and the condition, as it existsin nature, is not enforced. Again, close impregnation or in-breeding, which is not conducive to animal vigor, is thus prevented, where otherwise it would be necessary and always the practice. The fact that parthenogenesis prevails in the production of drones, has led to the theory that from a pure queen, how- ever mated, must ever come a pure drone. My own experience and observation, which have been very extended,and under circumstances most favorable for a correct judgment, have fully and completely confirmed this theory. Yet, if telegony or the impure mating of our cows, horses, and fowls renders the females of mixed blood ever afterward, as is believed and taught by many who would seem most competent to judge— though I must say I am very skeptical in the matter—then we must look closely as to our bees, for certainly, if a mammal, and especially if a fowl, is tainted by impure mating, then we may expect the same of insects. In fowls such influence, if it exist, must come simply from the presence in the female generative organs of the sperm-cells, or spermatozoa, and in mammals, too, there is little more than this, for though they are viviporous, so that the union and contact of the offspring and mother seem very intimate during the fetal development, yet there is no intermingling of blood, fora membrane ever separates that of the mother from that of the fetus, and only the nutritious and waste elements pass from one to the other. To claim that the mother is tainted through the circulation, is like claiming that the same result would follow her inhaling the breath of her progeny after birth. If such taint be pro- duced, it probably comesthrough the power of a cell to change those cells contiguous to it. That cells have such power is proved every day in case of wounds, and the spread of any disease. Ican only say that I believe this whole matter is still involved in doubt, and still needs more careful, scientific and prolonged observation. I have tried very extensive experi- ments with both chickens and bees, and all the evidence was against telegony. My brown Leghorn hens ran with light Brahma roosters all winter, then were removed for three OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 129 weeks, after which they were purely mated, and every one of the two hundred chickens were without any Brahma marks. Even the legs were absolutely clean. Likewise, thousands of drones, reared from pure Syrian queens, but mated to Italian drones, showed not the slightest Italian taint. I believe teleg- ony is a very doubtful hypothesis. THE NEUTERS, OR WORKER-BEES. These, called ‘‘the bees’’ by Aristotle, and even by Wild- man and Bevan, are by far the most numerous individuals of Fie. 51. - Worker-Bee much magnified, from Newman. the hive—there being from 15,000 to 40,000 in every good col- ony. It is possible for a colony to be even much more popu- lous than this. (Lubbock says that there are often 50,000 worker-ants ina nest.) These are also the smallest bees of the colony, as they measure but little more than one-half of an inch in length (Fig. 51.) As already stated, it takes about 130 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE 3 5,000 worker-bees to weigh a pound. Prof. W. R. Lazenby found the weight of a worker to be .0799 grams, a load of honey weighed .043 grams. This is maximum. The average is .022 grams; a load of pollen weighs .006 grams. Prof. Lazenby is probably correct in the assertion that usually only honey or pollen is carried by the bees; but I have repeatedly known of bees carrying both honey and pollen at the same time. ; The workers—as taught by Schirach, and proved by Mlle. Jurine, of Geneva, Switzerland, who, at the request of Huber, sought for and found, by aid of her microscope, the abortive Fic. 52. B Ovaries of Worker-Bee, from Ovaries of Laying- Worker, from Leuckart. Leuckart. ovaries (Fig. 52) are undeveloped females. Rarely, and prob- ably very rarely except when a colony is long or often queen- less, as is frequently true of our nuclei, these bees are so far developed as to produce eggs, which, of course, would always be drone-eggs. Such workers—known as “fertile ’’—were first noticed by Riem, while Huber saw one in the act of egg- aying. Paul L. Viallon and others have seen the same thing often. Several laying workers, sent me by Mr. Viallon, were examined, and the eggs and ovaries (Fig. 53) were plainly visible. Leuckart found, as seen in the figure, the rudiment of the spermatheca in both the common and the laying worker. Except in the power to produce eggs, they seem not unlike the other workers. Huber supposed that these were reared in cells contiguous to royal cells, and thus received royal food by OR, MANUAL, OF THER APIARY. 132 accident. ‘The fact, as stated by Mr. Quinby, that these occur in colonies where queen-larve were never reared, is fatal to the above theory. Langstroth and Berlepsch thought that these bees, while larve, were fed, though too sparingly, with the royal aliment, by bees in need of a queen, and hence the accelerated development. As already stated, the queen-larva is fed different and more abundant food than is the worker, and hence her accelerated and varied development. Is it not possible that these laying workers receive an excessof food as larve? Again, we have seen that laying workers occur in hopelessly queenless colonies ; and that queens are fed by the workers. May it not be that colonies hopelessly queenless take to feeding some special workers the chyle, and thus arise the laying workers? These are interesting inquiries that await solution. The generative organs are very sensitive, and exceedingly susceptible to impressions, and we may yet have much to learn as to the delicate forces which will move them to growth and activity. Though these laying workers area poor substitute for a queen, as they are incapable of producing any bees but drones, and are surely the harbingers of death and extinction to the colony, yet they seem to satisfy the workers, for often the latter will not brook the presence of a queen when a laying worker is in the hive, frequently will not suffer the existencein the hive of a queen-cell, even though capped. They seem to be satisfied, though they have very slight reason to be so. These laying workers lay indifferently in large or small cells—often place several eggsin a single cell, and show their incapacity in various ways. Laying workers seem to appear more quickly and in greater abundance in colonies of Cyprian and Syrian bees, after they become hopelessly queenless, than in Italian colonies. The maxille and labium of the worker-bee (Fig. 56) are much elongated (Fig. 54). The maxille (Fig. 54, 4, mx, mx) are deeply grooved, and are hinged to the head by strong chitinous rods (Fig. 54, A, c, c, St, St), to which are attached the muscles which move these parts. The gutter-like extremi- ties (Fig. 54, 4,/,2) are stiffened with chitine, and, when approximated, form a tube which is continued by a membrane to the mouth-opening of the pharynx, just between the bases 132 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; Fic. 54, i) pron. fel: B Tongue of Worker-Bee, much magnified.—Original, mx me Maxille. mp, mp Max. palpi. k k Labial palpi. bb Lora. o Sub-mentum. : ¢ Toneue. cc Cardines. m Mentum. J Funnel. St, St Stipes. Pp, Py Paraglossze. # Tubular rod. i, ¢ Lacinize. B Ligula, with sac ss Colorless membrane. s Colorless membrane, distended. f Funnel. & Sheath. A Maxille and labium. (' Cross-section of £& Tubular rod. ligula. (The above figure is drawn to the same scale as Fig. 27.) OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 133 of the jaws. This tube forms the largest channel through which nectar passes to the pharynx. The labium varies in length from .23 to .27 of an inch. By the sub-men- tum (Fig. 54, 4, 0) and two chitinous rods, the lora (Fig. 54, A, 6, 6), itis hinged to the maxilla. The base or mentum is chitinous beneath and membranous above. From the men- tum extends the tongue or ligula (Fig. 54, 4, ¢), the paraglosse (Fig. 54, 4, p, p), sac-like organs which connect with the cavity of the mentum, and so are distended with blood when the mentum is pressed. They also stand out like leaves or plates, and aid in directing the nectar which is drawn through the ligula into the mouth (Fig. 16). The labial palpi (Fig. 54, A, k, &) are four jointed, and in arrangement, form and func- tion resemble the maxilla. The tongue or ligula consists of an annulated sheath (Fig. 54, C, S) which is slitted along its under side to near the end. This is very hairy. Within this is a tubular rod (Fig. 54, Band .C, &) which is also slitted along its under side to near the end, and opens above at its base between the paraglosse (Fig. 54, C). Each margin of this slitted rod is united by a thin pubescent membrane to the corresponding margin of the surrounding sheath (Fig. 54, C, s). (So far as I know I was the first to discover this membrane.) Hence any pressure within the annular sheath may throw the central rod out (Fig. 54, 8, R). This results when we press on the mentum ; as the blood pushes into the sheath and straight- eus the folded membrane (Fig. 54, Cs), The bee then can take nectar in three ways, first rapidly when sipping from flowers containing much nectar (Figs. 54, 4, 57, 0, 0) by the large channels formed by approximating its maxille and labial palpi (Fig. 54, 4, Fig. 57, 0,0); secondly, slowly from deep tubular flowers, when it sips through the central rod; and, thirdly, it may lap from a smeared surface because of the slitted ligula. By use of colored liquids I have demonstrated that the bee does actually sip in all these ways. At the end of the ligula there is a funnel (Fig. 54, 4, 7, 56, 4). Strange to say the structure and physiology of the tongue of the honey-bee were more correctly explained by old Swam- merdam, than by most modern writers. Both heand Reaumur were quite accurate in their descriptions. Wolff, in his ele- ‘ 134 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE3 gant monograph from which I have taken several figures, described with beautiful illustrations the mouth organs of the honey-bee, but was in doubt as to their physiology. Dr. Hyatt, of New York, did much to explain the anatomy of the bee’s tongue; but so faras I knowI was the first to explain accurately the anatomy and physiology of this organ. Within the mentum (Fig. 55, C, m) are strong muscles for retracting Fic. 55. Tongue bent under Head, Tongue extended for sucking. m Maxille- f Retractor muscles. The LE Vigula. opening opposite L. at upper sm Sub-mentum. base of tongue between par- D Duet from upper aglossiv. All from Wolff. head and tho- racic glands. Base of Labium, the organ. The force of suction is doubtless analogous to the act of drinking on our own part. The rhythmical motion of the ligula in sipping honey is thus explained. By the muscles of the mouth the cavity is enlarged, producing suction, when by pressure swallowing is accomplished. When not in use, the tongue with the attendant mouth organs, are bent back under the head (Fig. 55, A). GLANDULAR ORGANS. These important organs, which have been so fully described by Siebold, Wolff, and especially by Schiemenz, are OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 135 Fic. 56. Head and Tongue of Bee, magnified twelve times, (From Department of Agriculture.) - a Antenna. m2xp Maxillary palpus. ip Labial palpus. m Mandibles. pg Paraglossa. t Ligula. g Epipharynx. mx Maxilla. b Funnel of tongue. 136 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; so intimately connected with the mouth organs, are so evi- dently useful in digestion, and are so well developed in the worker-bees, that they deserve full consideration. All the glands have a chitinous inner intivna and outer propria, anda middle epithelial membrane. The spinning gland of the larval bee is a simple tubular glaud, and is well illustrated by Schiemenz (Fig. 58). On each side within the head of the worker-bee (Fig. 59, uh g) are large glands, discovered by Meckel in 1846, and fully described by Siebold in 1870, which are very rudimentary in the queen and entirely absent in the drone. They are often called the lower head-glands., These are in form of the meibomian Fic. 57. Cross section of Tongue in use, after Cowan. 77 Labial palpi. oo Tube for sucking the nectar. mm Maxille. p Overlapping maxille. glands in our own eyelids; that is, a long duct bears many follicles rich with secreting cells, the whole looking like a ‘compound leaf with small leatlets. Dr. Packard says each follicle is unicellular. While all the others are acinose. The ducts empty on the floor of the mouth. ‘hese glands are very marked in nurse-bees, but smaller in aged bees. Schiemenz believes that these glands secrete the food for the larval bees and also for the laying queen. Their large size, their full development only in the nurse-bees, and their entire absence in queen and drones, surely seem to give great force to this view. As already stated, the queen-larva is fed very liberally, and almost exclusively, of this so-called bee-milk. Berlepsch says that the little pollen sometimes (?) found in the digestive tube of the queen-larva is accidental. The worker-larva re- ceives less of this secretion, and to that fed to the drone is OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 137 added, just at the last, some partially digested pollen which is shed when the alimentary canal is moulted with the last larval skin. The fact that undigested pollen is found in the larval food shows that this food is from the stomach, and is nota secretion. It has been suggested that the difference which Dr. Planta and others find in the composition of the larval food of worker, queen and drone larve is wholly due to this partially digested pollen which is withheld from the inchoate queen and workers. There are also large compound racemose or acinose glands (Fig. 59, 74 g)in the head, and also a similar pair (Fig. 58, 7 ¢) Fic. 58. Spinning Gland of Larva, and cross section of same, after Schiemenz, C Gland. S Sinus. IT Duct. D Common duet. in the thorax, which are by some thought to be the modified spinning glands of thelarva. These four glands unite intoa common duct, which passes through the mentum and opens just at the base of tongue on top in the groove between the paraglosse (Fig. 55, C, L, and 56). The thoracic glands were discovered by Ramdohr in 1811, while Meckel also discovered the second pair of cephalic glands, these are the upper head- glands; Schiemenz is probably correct in thinking that these glands, which are present in all bees, are for digesting the 138 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; nectar. The cane-sugar of nectar is certainly digested or changed into the more osmotic and assimilable glucose-like sugar of honey. Very likely these compound racemose glands supply the digestive ferment which accomplishes this part of Fic. 59. Gland System of Bee, after Girard. digestion. We similarly digest all the cane-sugar that we eat. As honey is not always fully digested, the drones and queens, as well as the workers, possess these glands. Wolff’s glands are large follicular glands (Fig. 60), situated at the base of the mandibles. From their position we might suppose that their secretion was useful in forming wax into comb, but their large size in the queens, and the fact that the OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 139 secretion from them is acid, would rather argue that they, like the racemose glands, were also digestive in their function. I would suggest that we call the thoracic glands, the glands of Ramdohr; the racemose glands of the head, the glands of Meckel, and the other glands of the head-glands of Siebold, in compliment to the excellent work which has been done in their study and elucidation; while the glands at the base of the mandibles may well be called, from their discoverer, Wolff’s glands. In studying the digestive organism we are greatly Jaw of Worker showing Wolff's gland, after Wolff. M Muscles. J Jaws. G Gland. indebted to Schiemenz and Schonfeld, who ‘have not only ex- plained by use of beautiful illustrations the detailed anatomy of the alimentary canal, but have been equally happy in describing the wonderful physiology of digestion in bees. Schonfeld, from a very elaborate series of experiments, con- cludes that the theory of Schiemenz and v. Siebold is not cor- rect. Hethinks the lower head-glands secrete saliva which moistens the pollen, and aids in digesting it. The fact that it is acid adds force to the theory. They empty on the floor of the mouth just where they should pour out the saliva. As the queen and drones never eat pollen, but are fed by the workers, they do not need these glands. Schonfeld thinks the larval food is digested pollen, and he claims to have found this in the true stomach of nurse-bees. Partially digested pollen he terms chyme, which, just before the drone-larve are to be THE BEE-KEEPER'S GUIDE} 140 Fic. 61. Diyestive Apparatus of Bee, X 10. (From Department of Agriculture.) Sarre TO Ss Ss < S ‘Bysuey DS ‘oBINgs--(LOUO Py s Y “SpUBLS [Tey y “qauBay JO SuaMFag a a ‘OUTISOJUT BSIVT *?") ‘ssuseyqdossp 0 “AUTISIFUT [TBI 2 Ff “TAVOY_ AO [SSAA [BSLO @ p ‘sarnqn} UBIYSIdyeyy } 9 “XBIOTLTR OTL pps DRIONL LON ‘sofa punodwmoy a “YoRuloys ONAY, ‘sv XBIOTIRSOTY Dsvre ‘YQNow-ToRurg 7 “XBIOTIOIT pod oT dad ONT “BUIXB Ve HB pBar doaoy [ 'OAy “tdyped peiqey 7 OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 141 sealed up, is fed to them. The chyle and larval food he finds to contain blood corpuscles, and he thinks them identical with the same in the blood of the bee. Schonfeld fed indigestible material like iron particles to starving bees that had brood. The chyle, the larval food, but not the blood of the nurse-bees contained thisiron. This food of the larve then must be chyle and nota secretion. I confirmed this by feeding bees sugar syrup in which I mixed finely pulverized charcoal. The char- coal appeared in the royal jelly in the queen-cells. As the charcoal is utterly non-osmotic, it could not pass to the blood, and so could not appearin any secretion, but could and would be in any regurgitated food. This secretion then appears to answer to the gastric juice in our own digestion. Again, the fact that it is acid, makes this conclusion more than war- ranted. This experiment certainly settles the matter. Again, these same lower head-glands are foundin some insects that do not feed their larve at all, as species of Eris- talis—wasp-colored two-winged flies—and of Nepa, a genus of water-bugs. Dr. Planta and others have shown that the chyle fed to queen-larve is not the same as that fed to drone-larva, nor yet like that fed to worker-larve. If this is chyle the difference could be explained, as it would arise from variation of food. If a secretion, it could not be easily explained. This view is adopted by Mr. Cowan, the ablest and most learned British authority on bees.. Bordas has found two other pairs of glands in both worker and drone bees, which he terms, from their position, the internal mandibular and sublingual. It would be interesting but difficult to determine what secretion, if not all the secretions, aided in kneading the wax. As in our own development, so in the embryo bee, the mid- intestine arises from the endoderm or inner layer of the initial animal. As the ectoderm or outer layer is around this, not only the mouth and vent, but the fore and hind intestine—all but the true stomach—arise by absorption at these points, or from invagination (a turning in) of the outerlayer. Infants are not infrequently born with an imperforate anus. In such cases there isan arrest, the absorption’ does not take place, and the surgeon’s knife comes to Nature’s relief. Strangely 142 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; enough in the bee—this is also true of ants and some wasps— this condition persists all through the larval period. Thus bee-larve have no anus or vent, and so void noexcreta. But as known both to Swammerdam and Newport, when the last larval skin is moulted the whole canal, with its contents, is Fic. 62. Section showing s'ructure of Honey-stomach, Stomach-muuth and Stomach, after Schiemenz, H S Honey-stomach, F Epithelial cells. S Stomach, V Stomach valve. m Muscles. h Hairs to hold pollen. S m Stomach-mouth, moulted with the skin. As already stated, the spinning glands in the larva become the thoracic, or glands of Ramdohr, in the adult bee. The cesophagus or gullet, the fine thread which is pulled out as we behead a bee, passes from the mouth through the muscular thorax (Figs. 25 and 27) to the honey-stomach, which is situated in theabdomen. Often, as every bee-keeper knows, this honey-stomach (Fig. 36, 2s, 61 4s) comes along with the OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 143 cesophagusas we pull the bee’s head from the body. The cesophagus (Fig. 61, @) is about .2of an inch long and .02 of an inchindiameter. In form and function the cesophagus is not different from the same organin other animals. It is simply a passageway for the food (Fig. 27, 61 02). The honey-stomach (Fig. 62, 2, s) or honey-sac is a sort of a crop or proventriculus. This sac is oval about .1 of an inch in diameter. While this organ is lined with a cellular layer (Fig. 62, HS, £), the cells are not large and numerous as in FIG. 63. Four pieces forming Stomach-Mouth, after Schiemenz. e Cells. T m Transverse muscles. Hs Longitudinal muscles. the true stomach (Fig. 62, S, Z). The muscular layers of this sac are quite pronounced (Fig. 62, #), as we should expect, as the honey has to be regurgitated from it to the honey-cells. This is truly a digestive chamber, as the nectar—cane-sugar— is here changed to honey—glucose-like sugar—but this is prob- ably through the ferment received from the glands of Meckel and Ramdohr, and not from any secretion from the organ itself. The pollen is also very slightly digested here, as Schon- feld has shown, through the action of the saliva from the glands of Siebold, or lower head-glands. At the posterior end of this honey-stomach is the stomach-mouth (Fig. 36, 62, s, 7, and 61, f) of Burmeister, which is admirably described by Schiemenz. It is really a stomach-mouth. Spherical in form, .02 of an inch in diameter, and, as Schonfeld well says, re- minds one of a flower-bud. It (Fig. 61%) can be seen by the 144 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; unaided eye, and as Schonfeld suggests, is easily studied with a low-power microscope. There are four jaw-like plates which guard this stomach-mouth (Fig. 63),and as Schimenz shows, open to let food pass to the true stomach. This same author tells us how by pressing with a needle, while viewing the stomach-mouth under a microscope, we can see the jaws open and shut. These plates have fine hairs, pointing down (Fig. 62, 4), which would, if a portion of the honey-containing pollen were taken by this very muscular stomach-mouth, retain the pollen-grains, while the honey could be passed back into the honey-stomach. Hence, Schiemenz very naturally concludes that this is a sort of strainer, constantly separating the pollen and honey as the bee is sipping nectar from flower to flower. Fic. 64, a a o ion e a e Stomach-mouth in Honey-Stomach, after Cowan. A Normal. a @sophagus. d Vales. B Raised in regurgitation. b Honey,stomach. e True stomach. As will be seen, this stomach-mouth has not only great longi- tudinal muscles (Fig. 62, 7), but also circular muscles as well (Fig. 62, 1). If Schiemenz is correct, then this stomach-mouth is to separate the honey and pollen. Even with this interest- ing apparatus, much of our honey has not a few pollen-grains, as every observing bee-keeper knows. The fact that nectar has much more pollen in it than does honey, makes Schie- menz’s view all the more probable. There is also a long prolongation (Fig. 62, v) from the stomach-mouth into the true stomach. This is .04 of an inch long, and is rich in cells, which are held by a very delicate OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 145 membrane which extends on still further. Schiemenz believes that this is a valve, and certainly unless drawn by the strong muscles in the walls out of the stomach as Schonfeld believes, it would act asa most efficient valve. If this does act as a perfect valve, then of course the nurse-bees can never feed the larve or queen any digested food from the true stomach. This is Schiemenz’s view. Pastor Schonfeld, however, still holds, and seems to have proved, that while this may serve as a valve it is under the control of the bee, and may be so drawn up by the very muscular honey-stomach as to permit regurgi- tation (Fig. 64). In this regurgitation of chyle, the stomach- mouth closely approximates the stomach end of the cesopha- gus (Fig. 64, 8); and so the chyle does not pass into the honey-stomach. This prolongation then isa valve under the control of the bee, andis another wonderful structure in this highly organized insect. The true stomach (Fig. 61, c, s) is curved upon itself, and is .4of aninch long and .1 of an inch in diameter. It is rugose, and the circular wrinkles or constrictions are quite regular. It is richly covered within by secreting cells (Fig. 62, 5,c). The mucous membrane is folded, and hence there are very numerous gastric cells. Undoubtedly the function of the gastric juice is the same as in our own stomachs, it aids to liquify or render osmotic—capable of being absorbed—the albuminous food, in this case the pollen. This view is con- firmed by the fact that we almost always find pollenin all stages of digestion in the true stomach of the bee. We may not wonder at the varied source of this digestive secretion ; these gastric cells, the lower head-glands, and possibly Wolff’s glands. Where among animals is such thorough digestive work accomplished ? Emptying into the pyloric or posterior end of the stomach (Fig. 61, d¢) are numerous tubules, the Malpighian tubules. These are the urinary organs, and re- move waste elements from the blood. They are really the bee’s kidneys. Like our own kidneys, they are nothing more than tubules lined with excreting cells. The small intestine is often called ileum (Fig. 61,72). This portion of the diges- tive tube is lined with very minute, sharp chitinous teeth, which Schiemenz believes are used to further masticate the 146 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE} pollen-grains, that have not yielded to the digestive action of the stomach. This opinion is sustained by the strongly mus- cular nature of the tube (Fig. 36, 4). The diameter of the ileum is hardly .02 of aninch. The rectum, or last portion of the intestine (Fig. 61, 77), is much larger than the ileum, and carries on its mucous or inner surface six glands (Fig. 36, 7, g), which Schiemenz calls rectal glands. It is quite likely that these may be excretory in function. Their position would make this view seem probable at the least. Minot claims that these are not glands nor absorbant organs. Fernald thinks them valvular, and believes they restrain the injesta. Before leaving the subject it seems well to remark that it now seems certain that the old view of Dufour, so ably advo- cated by Pastor Schonfeld is, despite the arguments and researches of Schiemenz, the correct one. Our experiments with charcoal prove this absolutely. The queen, drone and larve do not get their food asa secretion—a sort of milk—but it is rather the digested pollen modified, as the bees desire by varying their own food. In addition to this albuminous food a Jaw of Drone. b Jaw of Queen. ¢ Jaw of Worker. (Original.) the queen and drones also take much honey. Thus they need the glands which furnish the ferment that changes cane to reducible sugar, and they have them. If all honey were fully digested, then the drones and queen would not need any glands atall. The fact that the pollen that the larve do get is par- tially digested is further proof that this is chyme, or partially digested pollen. The jaws (Fig. 65, c) are very strong, without the rudimen- tary tooth, while the cutting edge is semi-conical, so that when OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 147 the jaws are closed they form an imperfect cone. Thus these organs are well formed to cut comb, knead wax, and perform their various functions. As we should expect, the muscles of the jaw are very large and powerful (Fig. 60). Wolff’s glands empty at the base of these, and are doubtless excited by their action—a proof that their secretion is gastricin nature. The worker’s eyes (Fig. 4) are like those of the queen, while their wings, like those of the drones (Fig. 46), attain the end of the body. These organs (Fig. 2), as in all insects with rapid flight, are slim and strong, and, by their more or less rapid vibrations, give the variety of tone which characterizes their hum. Thus we have the rapid movements and high pitch of anger, and the slow motion and mellow noteof content and joy. Landois proved many years since, that aside from the noise made by the wings, bees have a true voice. Thus he showed that a bumble-bee without wings, or with wings glued fast, would still hum. This voice is produced in the spiracles. Who has not noticed that a bumble-bee imprisoned closely in a flower still hums? Ihave also heard a carpenter-bee ina tunnel hardly larger than its body, hum loudly. Landois found this hum ceased when the spiracles were closed with wax. Hedescribes quite an intricate voice-box, with a com- plex folded membrane, the tension of which is controlled through the action of a muscle and tendon. Thus we see that bees have a vocal organization not very unlike our own in the method of its action. The piping of the queen is probably this true voice. Landois also states that bees and other insects also make noise by the movement of the abdominal segments, the one on the other. From the enormous muscles in the thorax (Fig. 25) we should expect rapid flight in bees. Marked bees have been known to fly one-half mile, unload and return in six minutes, and double that distance in eleven minutes. In thirty minutes they went two and one-half miles, unloaded and returned. Thus they fly slower when foraging at a dis- tance. These experiments were tried by my students, and the time was in the afternoon. I think they are reliable. Pos- sibly, early in the day the rapidity would be greater. Some- times swarms go so slowly that one can keep up with them. At other times they fly so rapidly that one needs a good horse 148 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; to follow them closely. Here the rate doubtless depends upon the queen. The legs of worker-bees are very strangely modified. As they are exceedingly useful in the bee economy, this is not strange. We findin the progressive development of all ani- mals, that such organs as are most used are most modified, and thus we see why the legs and mouth organs of the worker-bees are so wonderfully developed. The abundant compound hairs on the first joints of all the legs are very marked in the worker-bees. These are the pol- len-gathering hairs, and from their branching, fluffy nature are well suited to gather the pollen-grains. On the anterior legs the antenna cleaner (Fig. 66) is well marked, as it is in all Hymenoptera except the lowest families where itis nearly or quite absent. In the honey-bee, this is found in the queen and drone as wellas in the worker. It is situated at the base of the first tarsus, and consists of a nearly semi-cylindrical concavity (Fig. 66, c), armed on the outer side with from seventy-eight to ninety projecting hairs. ‘These teeth-like hairs projecting as fringe form a very delicate brush. Extending from the tibia is a blade-like organ—really Antenna-Cleaner of Worker-Bee.—Original. C Cavity. S Spur. the modified tibial spur (Fig. 66, S)—which when the leg is bent at this joint, comes squarely over the notch in the tarsus. Near the base on the inside a projecting knob is seen which perhaps acts asa strengthener. The part of this blade or spur OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 149 that opposes the notch when in use consists of a delicate mem- brane. In other Hymenoptera this spur is greatly varied. Often, as in the ants and mud-wasps, it is also delicately fringed. Sometimes it has a long projecting point, and is thickly set with spinous hairs. That this organ is an antenna-cleaner is quickly seen by watching a bee—preferably a bumble-bee—come from a tubu- Fic. 67, . Anterior Leg of Worker-Bee.—Original. C Coxa. T Trochanter, F Femur, Ti Tibia. 12345 Tarsal joints in order. Cl Claws. lar flower, like that of the malva, or by placing a honey-bee, bumble-bee or wasp on the inside of a window-pane and dust- ing its antenne with flour or pulverized chalk. The insect at once draws its antenne, one and then the other, through these admirable dusters, till the organs are entirely free from the dust. The bee in turn cleans its antenna-cleaners by scraping them between the inner brush-like faces of the basal tarsi of its middle legs, which is done each time after they are used to clean an antenna. The paper-making wasps, and I 150 THE BRE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; presume all wasps clean these organs by passing them between their jaws, much as a child cleans his fingers after eating candy, except here lips take the place of jaws. Wecan hardly conceive of a better arrangement for this purpose, a delicate brush and a soft membrane; even better than the housewife armed with soft brush anda silk kerchief, for this antenna cleaner just fits the organs to be dusted. We have seen the important function of the antennz, as most delicate touch- Fic. 69, A Pulvilli in use. B Claws in use. c.e, Claws. Ah. Hairs. p.p. Pulvilli. t.t. Last joint of Tarsus. End of Middle Leg of Worker-Bee.—Original. organs, and as organs of smell, two senses of marvelous devel- opment inthe bee. Itis as imperative that the bee keeps its antenne dust-free as that the microscopist keeps his glasses immaculate. A delicate brush (Figs. 66 and 67) on the end of the tibia opposite the spur and also the brush of rather spinous hairs on the tarsus (Fig. 66) are of use to brush the hairs, eyes and face, as may be seen by careful observation. The claws and pulvilli—the delicate gland between the claws—are well marked on all the feet of bees. The claws (Fig. 67, cl) are toothed, and are very useful in walking up wooden or other rough surfaces (Fig. 68, 2), as they are used just asa squirrel uses its claws in climbing a tree. These OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 18% claws are also used in holding the bees to some object, or together while clustering. Whata grip they must have. It is as if we were tograspa limb or branch and then hold hundreds, yes thousands, of other persons as heavy as ourselves who had in turn grasped hold of us. When walking up a vertical wall of glass or other smooth metal, the claws are of no use, and so are turned back (Fig. 68, 4), and the pulvilli—glandular organs—are spread out and serve to hold the bee. These secrete a viscid or adhesive substance which so sticks that the bee can even walk up a window-pane. This is why bees soon cloud or befoul glass over which they constantly walk. We thus understand why a bee finds it laborious and difficult to walk up a moist or dust-covered glass or metal surface. The middle legs of the worker-bee are only peculiar in the prominent tibial spur (Fig. 69), and the brushes or pollen- combs on the inside of the first tarsus. It has been said that the spur is useful in prying off the pollen-masses from the posterior legs, as the bee enters the hive to deposit the pollen in the cells. This is doubtless an error. Thequeen and drone have this spur even longer than does the worker; the pollen comes off easily, and needs nocrow-bar to loosen it. It is com- mon among insects, and there are often two. The coarse, projecting hairs on all the feet are doubtless the agents that push off the loads of pollen. We have already seen how the brushes or combs on the inner face of the first tarsus of the middle legs serve to remove the dust from the antenna cleaner. Thesealso serve ascombs, like similar but more perfect organs on the posterior legs, to remove the pollen from the pollen-hairs, and pack itin the pollen-baskets on the hind legs. Mr. Root speaks of the tongue as the organ for collecting pollen. Are not these hairs really the important agents in this important work ? But the posterior legs are the most interesting, as it is rare to find organs more varied in their uses, and so as we should expect, these are strangely modified. The branching or pollen-gathering hairs (Fig. 71) are very abundant on the coxa trochanter and femur, and not absent, though much fewer (Fig. 70) on the broad triangular tibia. The basal tarsus (Fig. 70) is quadurate, and it and the tibia on the outside (Fig. 70) 152 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; Fic. 70. Outside of Tibia and Tarsi of Posterior Leg of Worker- Bee, showing Corbicula,— Original. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 153 Fic. 71. : aN ; Mink Oy zi ) Inside Posterior Leg of Worker-Bee.— Original. 154 THE BEK-KEEPER’S GUIDE; are smooth and concave, especially on the posterior portion, which shallow cavity forms the corbicula or ‘' pollen-basket.”’ This is deepened by stiff marginal hairs, which stand up like stakes ina sled. These spinous hairs not only hold the pollen- mass, as do stakes, but often pierce it,and so bind the soft pollen to the leg. Opposite the pollen cavity of the first tarsus, or on the inside (Fig. 71), are about eleven rows of stiff hairs. They are of golden color, and very beautiful. These may be called the pollen-combs, for it is they that gather, for the most part, the pollen from the pollen-gathering hairs of legs and body, and convey it to and packitin the pollen-baskets. As we have seen (Fig. 69), there are less perfect combs—similar in character, position and function—on the middle legs. The contiguous ends of the tibia and first tarsus or planta are most curiously modified to form the wax-jaws. The back part of this joint (Figs. 70, 71) reminds one of a steel trap with teeth, or of the jaws of an animal, the teeth in this case consisting of spinous hairs. The teeth onthe tibia, the pecten or comb, are strong and prominent. These shut against the upper ear- like auricle of the planta, and thus the function of these wax- jaws is doubtless to grasp and remove the wax-scales from the wax-pockets, and carry them to the jaws of the bees. These wax-jaws are not found in queens or drones, nor in other than wax-producing bees. They are well developed in Trigona and Melipona, and less, though plainly marked, in bombus. Girard gives this explanation in his admirable work Les Abeilles; and as he is no plagiarist, as he gives fullest credit to others, he may be the discoverer of these wax-jaws. If he is not, I know not whois. The genus Apis is peculiar among our bees, and really exceptional among insects in having no posterior tibial spurs. They would, of course, be in the way of action of the wax-jaws. As before stated, there are six seg- ments to the abdomen, in the queen and worker-bee (Fig.9), and seven in the male. Each of these abdominal rings consists of a dorsal piece or plate—tergite or notum and pleurites united— which bears the spiracle, and which overlaps the ventral plate or sternite. These plates are strengthened with chitine. These rings are connected with a membrane, so that they can OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 155 push in and out, something as the sections of a spy-glass are worked. The ventral or sternal abdominal plates of the second, third, fourth and fifth segments of the worker (Fig. 72) are ° Fic. 72. An < ay Underside of Abdomen of Worker-Bee.—Original. w Wax Scales. w.w. Wax Scales. modified to form the ‘‘ wax-pockets ;”’ though wax-plate would be amore appropriate name. These wax-plates (Fig. 73) are smooth, and form the anterior portion of each of these ventral plates. Each is margined with arim of chitine, which gives it strength, and makes ‘‘pocket’’ a more appropriate name, Fic. 73. wp Wax-Plates. eh Compound Hairs. especially as the preceding segment shuts over these wax- plates. The posterior portion—less than half the sternite (Fig. 73)—bears compound hairs, and shuts over the succeed- 156 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; ing wax-pocket. These wax-pockets are absent, of course, in queen and drones. Inside the wax-plates are the glands that secrete the wax. When the wax leaves these glands it is liquid, and passes by osmosis through the wax-plateand is molded on its outer face. The worker-bees possess at theend of the abdomen an organ of defense, which they are quick to use if occasion demands. Female wasps, the femalesof the family Mutillide, and worker and queen ants, also possessa sting. In all other Hymenoptera, like Chalcid and Ichneumon flies, gall-flies, saw- flies, horn-tails, etc., while there is no sting, the females have a long, exserted ovipositor, which, in these families, replaces the sting, and is useful, not as an organ of defense, but as an auger or saw, to prepare for egg-laying, or else, asin case of the gall-flies, to wound and poison the vegetable tissue, and thus by irritation to cause the galls. This organ in the worker-bee is straight, and not curved as is the sting of the queen. The poison whichis emitted in stinging, and which causes the severe pain, is bothan acid and an alkaline liquid, which Carlet shows are both necessary for maximum results. These are secreted by a double tubular gland (Fig. 38, Pg.) and stored in a sac (Fig. 74, c, and 38, Pd.) which is about the size of a flax-seed. This sac is connected by a tube (Fig. 74, 47) with the reservoir of the sting. The sting isa triple organ consisting of three sharp hollow spears, which are very smoothandof exquisite polish. If we magnify the most beautifully wrought steel instrument, it looks rough and unfinished; while the parts of the sting, however highly magnified, are smooth and perfect. The true relation of the three parts of the sting was accurately described by Mr. J. R. Bledsoe, in the American Bee Journal, Vol. VI, page 29. The action in stinging, and the method of extruding the poison, are well described in a beautifully illustrated article by Mr. J. D. Hyatt, in Vol. I, No. 1, of American Quarterly Microscopical Journal. The larger of the three awls (Fig. 74, 4) usually, though incorrectly, styled a sheath, has a large cylindrical reservoir at its base (Fig. 74, S), whichis entirely shut off from the hollow (Fig. 74, 7) in the more slender part of the awl, which latter serves no purpose whatever, except to give OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 157 strength and lightness. Three pairs of minute barbs (Fig. 74) project like the barbs on a fish-hook, from the end of this awl. The reservoir connects at its base with the poison-sac and below, by a slit, with the opening (Fig. 74, V) made by the Fic. 74, Sting with Lancets drawn one side, cross-section of Sting, and a Lancet, much magnified.—Original. C Poison sac. if Tube from sac to S Reservoir. A Awl. reservoir. £,E Valves. U,U Barbs. B,B Lancets. H Hollow in awl. J, I Hollows in lancets. 0,O Openings from hollow 7,7 Ridges in awl. T’ Groove in lancet. in lancets. approximation of the three awls. ‘The other two awls (Fig. 74, B, B&B), which we call lancets, are also hollow (Fig. 74, Z, /). They are barbed (Fig. 74, U, UV) much like a fish-hook, except 158 * THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; that there are eight or ten barbs instead of one. Five of the barbs are large and strong. These barbs catch hold and cause the extraction of the sting when the organ is used. Near the base of each lancet is a beautiful valvular organ (Fig. 74, Z, £). Mr. Hyatt thought these acted like a hydraulic ram, and by suddenly stopping the current forced the poison through the hollow lancets. It seeris more probable that the view of Mr. T. G. Bryant (Hardwick’s Science Gossip, 1875) is the more correct one. He suggests that these are really suction-valves— pistons, so to speak—which, as the piston-rods—the lancets— push out, suck the poison from the sacs. Carlet shows that the poison-sac is not muscular, so the pumping is necessary. The hollow inside each lancet (Fig. 74, 7, 7), unlike that of the awl, is useful. It opens anteriorly in front of the first six barbs (Fig. 74, 0, 0), as shown by Mr. Hyatt, and posteriorly just back of the valves into the central tube (Fig. 74, V), and through it into the reservoir (Fig. 74, S). The poison then can pass either through the hollow lancets (Fig. 74, /, 7) or through the central tubes (Fig. 74, VV), between the three spears. The lancets are held to the central piece by projections (Fig. 74, 7, 7) from the latter, which fit into corresponding grooves (Fig. 74, 7) of the lancets. In the figure the lancets are moved one side to show the barbs and valves; normally they are held close together, and thus form the tube (Fig. 74, NV, Fig. 44, S¢.) At the base of the central awl two flexible arms (Fig. 75, 6,6) run out and up, where they articulate with strong levers (Fig. 75, D, D). The two lancets are singularly curved and closely joined to the flexible arms by the same kind of dovetailed groove and projection already described. These lancets con- nect at their ends (Fig. 75, c, c) with heavy triangular levers (Fig. 75, B, B), and these in turn with both Cand Datjands. Allof these levers, which also serve as fulcra (Fig. 75, B, C and ), are very broad, and so give great space for muscular attachment (Fig. 75, ™). ‘These muscles, by action, serve to compress the poison-sac, also cause the lever (Fig. 75, 2) to rotate about S as a center, and thus the whole sting is thrown out something as a knee-joint works, and later the lancets are pushed alternately further into the wound, till stopped by the OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 159 valves striking against the farther end of the reservoir, in the central awl (Fig. 74, S). As Hyatt correctly states in his excellent article, the so-called sheath first cuts or pierces, then the lancets deepen the wound. Beside the sting are two feeler- like organs (Fig. 75, Z, E), which doubtless determine where best to insert the sting, though usually there would seem little time for consideration. Leuckart discovered a second smaller gland (Fig. 38, Sg,) mentioned also by Girard and Vogel, which also has a sac or reservoir where its secretion is stored. This secretion, as first suggested by Leuckart, is supposed to act asa lubricant to keep the sting in good condition. The fact that muscles connect the various parts (Fig. 75) explains Fic. 75. Sting of Worker-Bee, modified from Hyatt and Bryant. how a sting may act, even after the bee is apparently lifeless, er, what is even more wonderful, after it has been extracted from the bee. Dr. Miller thinks a sting extracted months before may still act. The barbs hold one lancet as a fulcrum for the other, and so long as the muscles are excitable, so long is a thrust possible. Thus I have known a bee, dead for hours, to sting. A wasp, dead more than a day, with the abdomen cut off, made a painful thrust, and stings extracted for several 160 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; minutes could still bring tears by their entering the flesh. In stinging, the awl first pierces, then the lancets follow. As the lancets push in, the valves force the poison already crowded into the reservoir forward, close the central tube, when the poison is driven through the lancets themselves, and comes out by the openings near the barbs (Fig. 74,0, 0). The drop of poison which we see on the sting when the bee is slightly irritated, as by jarring the hive on acold day, is pushed through the central opening by muscular contraction attend- ant upon theelevation of the abdomen and extrusion of the sting. The young microscopists will find it difficult to see the barbs, especially of the central awl, as it is not easy to turn the parts so that they will show. Patience and persistence, however, will bring success. Owing to the barbs the sting is often sacrificed by use. As the sting is pulled out, the body is so lacerated that the bee dies. Sometimes it will live several hours, and even days, but the loss of the sting is surely fatal, as my students have often shown by careful experiment. Itis hardly necessary to say that there is no truth in the statement that the sting is used to polish the comb; nor doI think there is any shadow of foundation for the statement that poison from the sting is dropped into the honey-cells to preserve the honey. The formic acid of honey doubtless comes from the honey- stomach. Each is an animal secretion. The workers hatch from impregnated eggs, which can only come from a queen that has met a drone, and are always laid in the small, horizontal cells (Fig. 78, c). It is true that workers are very rarely reared in drone-cells when the rim is constricted. Mr. Root found that larger cells of foundation were likewise narrowed. These eggs are in no wise different, so far as we can see, from those whichare laid in the drone or queen cells. All are cylindrical and slightly curved (Fig. 39, a, 6), and are fastened by one end to the bottom of the cell, and a little to one side of the center. The eggs will not hatch unless a little food is added. Is thisabsorbed, or does it soften the shell so as to make exit possible? Girard says that the egg on the first day stands oblique to the bottom of the cell, is more inclined the second day, and is horizontal the third day. As in other animals, the eggs from different queens vary per- OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 161 ceptibly in size. As already shown, these are voluntarily fer- tilized by the queen as she extrudes them, preparatory to fastening them in the cells. These eggs, though small—one- sixteenth of an inch long—may be easily seen by holding the comb so that the light will shine into the cells. With experi- ence they are detected almost at once, but I have often found it quitt® difficult to make the novice see them, though very plainly visible to my experienced eye. The egg hatches in threedays. The larva (Fig. 39, d, e, /), incorrectly called grub, maggot—and even caterpillar, by Hun- ter—is white, footless, and lies coiled upin the cell till near maturity. It is fed a whitish fluid, the chyle already described, though this seems to be given grudgingly, as the larva never seems to have more than it wishes toeat,so itis fed quite frequently by the mature workers. It would seem that the workers fear an excessive development, which, as we have seen, is most mischievous and ruinous, and work to prevent the same by a mean and meager diet. Not only do the worker- larve receive the chyle grudgingly, but just at the last, before the cellis sealed, a different diet is given. There are more albuminoids and fats, and less carbohydrates, as shown by Dr. de Planta. Itis probable that honey is also given them, and so Dufour was wholly right in urging that digested food was fed to the larve, for honey is digested nectar. This added honey is what probably changes the food. He was also correct in supposing the food of the larva to beasort of chyle. .M. Quinby, Doolittle, and others, say water is also an element of this food. But bees often breed very rapidly when they do not leave the hive at all, and so water, other than that contained in the honey, etc.,can not be added. The time when bees seem to need water, and so repair to the rill and the pond, is during the heat of spring and summer, when they are the most busy. May this not be quaffed for the most part to slake their own thirst? If wateris carried to the hivesit is doubtless given to the nurse-bees. They may need water when the weather is hot and brood-rearing at its very height. Thereis no reason to doubt that bees, like all other active animals, need water as they do salt, to aid the physiological processes. They cool by evaporation, and need water to promote the process. 162 THE BEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE; When they smother, is not the moisture about themin part the water of respiration rather than exclusive honey ? At first the larve lie at the bottom of the cells, in the cream-like ‘‘ bee-milk.’? Later they curl up, and, when fully grown, are straight (Fig. 39, 7). They now turn head down and cast their skin and digestive canal, then turn with their heads towards the mouth of the cell (Fig. 39, 7). Before this, however, the cell has been capped. In eight days (Root says nine or ten) from the laying of the egg, the worker-cell, like the queen-cell, is capped over by the worker-bees. This cap is composed of pollen and old wax, so it is darker, more porous, and more easily broken than the caps of the honey-cells; it is also more convex (Fig. 39, 4). The larva, now full grown, having lapped up all the food placed before it, spins its silken cocoon, so excessively thin that it requires a great number to appreciably reduce the size of the cell. The silken part of the cocoon extends down from the cap but a short distance, but like moths and many other insects, the larval bee, just before it pupates, spreads a thin glue or varnish over the entire inner part of the cell. These cocoons, partly of silk and partly of glue, are well seen when we reduce combs to wax withthe solar wax- extractor. These always remain inthe cells after the bees escape, and give to old comb its dark color and great strength. Yet they aresothin that cells used even for a dozen years, seem to serve as well for brood as when first used. Indeed, I have good combs which have been in constant use nineteen years. As before stated, the larva shedsits skin, and at the last moults the alimentary canal or digestive tube with its con- tents as well. These, as stated by Vogel, are pushed to the bottom of the cell. In three days the insect assumes the pupa state (Fig. 39, g). In allinsects the spinning of the cocoon seems an exhaustive process, for so faras I have observed, and that is quite at length, this act is succeeded by a variable period of repose. By cutting open cells it is easy to determine just the date of forming the cocoon, and of changing to the pupa state. The pupa looks like the mature bee with allits appendages bound close about it, though the color is still whitish. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 163 In twenty-one days, it may be twenty with the best condi- tions, the bees emerge from thecells. Every bee-keeper should hold in memory these dates: Three days for the egg, six for the larva, and twelve days after the larva is sealed over. Of course, there may be slight variations, as the temperature of the colony is not always just the same. The old writers were quite mistaken in thinking that the advent of these was an occasion of joy and excitement among the bees. All apiarists have noticed how utterly unmoved the bees are, as they push over and crowd by these new-comers in the most heedless and discourteous manner imaginable. Wildman tells of seeing the workers gathering pollen and honey the same day that they came forth from the cells. This idea is quickly disproved if we Italianize black bees. We know that for some days—usually about two weeks if the col- ony isina normal condition, though if all the bees are very young it may be only one week—these young bees do not leave the hive at all, except in case of swarming, when bees even too young to fly will attempt to go with the crowd. However, the young bees do fly out for a sort of ‘‘ play spell’’ before they commence regularly to work in the field. They doubtless wish to try their wings. These young bees, like young drones and queens, are much lighter colored when they first leave the cell. The worker-bees never attain a greatage. Those reared in autumn may live for eight or nine months, and if in queen- less colonies, where little labor is performed, even longer ; while those reared in spring will wear out in three months, and when most busy will often die in from thirty to forty-five days. None of these bees survive the year through, so there is a limit to the number which may existin a colony. Asa good queen will lay, when in her best estate, three thousand eggs daily, and as the workers live from one to three months, it might seem that forty thousand was too smalla figure for the number of workers. Without doubt a greater number is possible. That it is rare is not surprising, when we remember the numerous accidents and vicissitudes that must-ever attend the individuals of these populous communities. . The function of the worker-bees is to do all the manual labor of the hives. They secrete the wax, which, as already 164 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; stated, forms in small scales (Fig. 72, w) under the over-lap- ping rings under the abdomen. I have found these wax- scales on both old and young. According to Fritz Muller, the admirable German observer, so long a traveler in South America, the bees of the genus Melipona secrete the wax on the back. The young bees commence work ina day from the cells. They build the comb, ventilate the hive, feed the larve, queen and drones, and cap the cells. The older bees—for, as readily seen in Italianizing, the young bees do not usually go forth for the first two weeks—gather the honey, collect the pollen, or bee-bread as it is generally called, bring in the propolis or bee-glue, which is used to close openings and as a cement, supply the hive with water (?), defend the hive from all im- proper intrusion, destroy drones when their day of graceis past, kill and arrange for replacing worthless queens, destroy inchoate queens, drones, or even workers, if circumstances demand it, and lead forth a portion of the bees when the con- ditions impel them to swarm. When there are no young bees, the old bees will act as housekeepers and nurses, which they otherwise refuse to do. The young bees, on the other hand, will not go forth to glean, at less than six days of age, even though there are no old bees to do this necessary part of bee-duties. An indirect function of all the bees is to supply animal heat, as the very life of the bees requires that the temperature inside the hive be main- tained at a rate considerably above freezing. In the chemical processes attendant upon nutrition, much heat is generated, which, as first shown by Newport, may be considerably aug- mented at the pleasure of the bees, by forced respiration. The bees, by a rapid vibration of their wings, have the power to ventilate their hives and reduce the temperature when the weather is hot. Thus they are able to moderate the heat of summer, and temper the cold of winter. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 165 CHAPTER IIL SWARMING, OR THE NATURAL METHODS OF INCREASE. The natural method by which an increase of colonies among bees is secured, is of great interest, and though it has been closely observed, and assiduously studied for a long period, and has given rise to theories as often absurd as sound, yet even now it is a fertile field for investigation, and will repay any who may come with the true spirit of inquiry, for thereis much concerning it whichis involved in mystery. Why do bees swarm at unseemly times? Why is the swarm- ing spirit so excessive at times and so restrained at other sea- sons? ‘These and other questions we are to apt to refer to erratic tendencies of the bees, when there is no question but that they follow naturally upon certain conditions, perhaps intricate and obscure, which it is the province of the investi- gator to discover. Who shall be first to unfold the principles which govern these, as all other actions of the bees ? In the spring or early summer, when the hive has become very populous, the queen, asif conscious that a home could be overcrowded, and foreseeing such danger, commences to deposit drone-eggs in drone-cells, which the worker-bees, perhaps moved by like consideration, begin to construct, if they are not already in existence. Drone-comb is almost sure of construc- tion at such times. In truth, if possible the workers will always build drone-comb. No sooner is the drone-brood well under way, than the large, awkward queen-cells are com- menced, often tothe number of ten or fifteen, though there may be not more than three or four. The Cyprian and Syrian bees often start from fifty to one hundred queen-cells. In these, eggs are placed, and the rich royal jelly added, and soon, often before the cells are even capped, and very rarely 166 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; before a cell is built—Mr. Doolittle says the first swarms of the season never leave until there are capped cells—if the bees are crowded, the hives unshaded, and the ventilation insuffi- cient, some bright day, usually about eleven o’clock, after an unusual disquiet both inside and outside the hive, a large part of the worker-bees—being off duty for the day, and having previously loaded their honey-sacs—rush forth from the hive asif alarmed by thecry of fire. Crowded, unshaded and illy ventilated hives hasten swarming. Swarming rarely takes place except on bright, pleasant days, and is most common from eleven to two o’clock. The bees seem off duty for the day. They load their honey-stomachs, and amid a great com- motion inside the hive and out, they push forth with the queen, though she is never leader, and is frequently late in her exit. Dr. Miller once hada swarm from a colony from which he had taken a queen an hour before. Of course, the swarm returned to the hive. It is often asserted that bees do no gathering on the day they swarm, previous to leaving the hive. Thisis not true. Mr. Doolittle thinks they are just as active as on other days. The queen, however, is off duty for some time before the swarm leaves. She even lays scantily for two or three days prior to this event. This makes the queen lighter, and prepares her for her long, wearying flight. In her new home she does no laying for several hours. The assertion that bees always cluster on the outside preliminary to swarming, is not true. The crowded hive makes this common, though in a well-man- aged apiary it is very infrequent. The bees, once started on their quest for a new home, after many gyrations about the old one, dart forth to alight upon some bush (Fig. 76), limb, or fence, though in one case I knew the first swarm of bees to leave at once for parts unknown, without even waiting to cluster. After thus meditating for the space of from one to three hours, upon a future course, they again take wing and leave for their new home, which they have probably already sought out, and fixed up. Some suppose the bees look up a home before leaving the hive, while others claim that scouts are in search of one while the bees are clustered. The fact that bees take a right-line to Fic. 76. . Yi E Hiving a Swarm.—From Department of Agriculture.; 168 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE ; their new home, and fly too rapidly to look as they go, would argue that a home is pre-empted, at least, before the cluster is Gissolved. The fact that the cluster remains sometimes for hours—even over night—and at other times for a brief period, hardly more than fifteen minutes, would lead us to infer that the bees cluster while waiting for anew home to be found. Yet, why do bees sometimes alight after flying a long distance, as dida first swarm one season upon our College grounds? Was their journey long, so that they must needs stop to rest, or were they flying at random, not knowing whither they were going? This matter is no longer a matter of question. I now know of several cases where bees have been seen to clean out their new home the day previous to swarming. In each case the swarm came and took possession of the new home the day after the house-cleaning. ‘The reason of clustering is no doubt to give the queen a rest before her long flight. Her muscles of flight are all ‘‘soft,’? as the horsemen would say. She must find this a severe ordeal, even after the rest. If for any reason the queen should fail to join the bees, and rarely when she is among them, possibly because she finds she is unfit for the journey, they will, after having clustered, return to their old home. They may unite with another swarm, and enter another hive. Many writers speak of clustering as rare unless the queen is with the swarm. A large experience convinces me that the reverse is quite the case. The youngest bees will remain in the old hive, to which those bees which are abroad in quest of stores will return. Most of these, however, may be in time to join the emigrants. The presence of young bees on the ground immediately after a swarm has issued—those with flight too feeble to join the rovers—will often mark the previous home of the swarm. Mr. Doolittle confines a teacupful, or less, of the bees when he hives the swarm, and after the colonyis hived he throws the confined bees up in the air, when he says they will at once go to the hive from which the swarm issued. Soon, in seven days, often later if Italians—Mr. E. E. Hasty says in from six to seventeen days—the first queen will come forth from her cell, and in two or three days she will, or may, lead a new swarm forth; but before she does this, the peculiar note, known as the piping of the queen, may be heard. OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 169 This piping sounds like “ peep,” ‘‘ peep,’’ is shrill and clear, and can be plainly heard by placing the ear ‘to the hive, nor would it be mistaken. This sound is Landois’ true voice, as it is made even in the cell, and also by a queen whose wings are cut off. Cheshire thinks this sound is made by friction of the segments, one upon the other, as the queet' moves them. The newly hatched queen pipes in seven or eight hours after com- ing from the cell. She always pipes if a swarm is to issue, and if she pipes a second swarm will go unless weather or man interferes. The second swarm usually goes in from thirty-five to forty-five hours after the piping is heard. This piping of the liberated queen is followed by a lower, hoarser note, made by a queen still within the cell. The queen outside makes a longer note followed by several shorter ones; the enclosed queens repeat tones of equallength. This piping is best heard by placing the ear to the hive in the evening or early morning. If heard, we may surely expect a ‘swarm the next day but one following, unless the weather be too unpleasant. Some have supposed that the cry of the liberated queen was that of hate, while that by the queen still imprisoned was either enmity or fear. Never will anafter-swarm leave, unless preceded by this peculiar note. Queens occasionally pipe at other times, even in acage. ‘This is probably a note of alarm, as the attendant bees are always aroused by it. At successive periods of one or two days, though the third swarm usually goes two days after the second, one, two, or even three more swarms may issue from the old home. Mr. Langstroth knew five after-swarms to issue, and others have reported eight and ten. The cells are usually guarded by the worker's in all such cases against the destruction of the queen. These last swarms, all after the first, will each be heralded by the piping of the queen. They will be less particular as to the time of day when they issue, as they have been known to leave before sunrise, and even after sunset. The well-known api- arist, Mr. A. F. Moon, once knew a second swarm to issue by moonlight. They will, as a rule, cluster further from the hive. The after-swarms are accompanied by the queen, and in case swarming is delayed, may be attended by a plurality of queens. I have counted five queens in a second swarm. Berlepsch and 170 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; Langstroth each saw eight queens issue with a swarm, while others report even more. Mr. Doolittle says the guards leave the cells when the queen goes out, and then other queens, which have been fed for days in the cells, rush out and go with the swarm. Hesays he had known twenty to go with third swarms. I have seen several young queens liberated in a colony. How does Mr. Doolittle explain that ? Mr. Root thinks that a plurality of queens only attends the last after- swarm, when the bees decide to swarmno more. These virgin queens fly very rapidiy, so the swarm will seem more active and definite in its course than will first swarms, and are quite likely to cluster high upif tall trees are near by. When the swarming is delayed it is likely that the queens are often fed by the workers while yet imprisoned in the cells. The view is generally held that these queens are keptin the cells that the queen which has already come from the cell may not kill them. The cutting short of swarming preparations before the sec- ond, third, or even the first swarm issues, is by no meansa rare occurrence. This is effected by the bees destroying the queen-cells, and sometimes by a general extermination of the drones, and is generally to be explained by a cessation of the honey-yield. Cells thus destroyed are easily recognized, as they are torn open from the side (Fig. 45, £) and not cut back from the end. It is commonly observed that while a moderate yield of honey is very provocative of swarming, a heavy flow seems frequently to absorb the entire attention of the bees, and so destroy the swarming impulse entirely. Swarming-out at other times, especially in late winter and spring, is sometimes noticed by apiarists. This is doubtless due to famine, mice, ants, or some other disturbing circum- stance which makes the hive intolerable to the bees. In such cases the swarm is quite likely to join with some other colony of the apiary. OR, sMANUAL OF THE APIARY. 171 CHAPTER IV. PRODUCTS OF BEES; THEIR ORIGIN AND FUNCTION. Among all insects, bees stand first in the variety of the useful products which they give us, and, next to the silk-moths, in the importance of these products. They seem the more remarkable and important in that so few insects yield articles of commercial value. True, the cochineal insect, a species of bark-louse, gives us an important coloring material; the lac insect, of the same family, gives us the important element of our best glue—shellac; another scale insect forms the Chi- nese wax of commerce; the blister-beetles afford an article prized by the physician, while we are indebted to oneof the gall-flies for a valuable element of ink; but the honey-bee affords not only a delicious article of food, but also another article of no mean commercial rank, namely, wax. We will proceed to examine the various products which come from bees. HONEY. Of course, the first product of bees, not only to attract attention, but also in importance, is honey. And what is honey? It is digested nectar, a sweet, neutral substance gathered from the flowers. This nectar contains much water, though the amount is very variable, a mixture of several kinds of sugar and a small amount of nitrogenous matter in the form of pollen. Nectar is peculiar in the large amount of sucrose or cane-sugar which itcontains. Often there is nearly or quite as much of this as of all the other sugars. We can not, therefore, give the composition of honey. It will be as various as the flowers from whichit is gathered. Again, the thoroughness of the digestion will affect the composition of honey. This digestion is doubtless accomplished through the aid of the saliva—that from the racemose glands of the head and thorax (Fig. 59, /hg, lg, and Fig. 61, No. 2 and No. 3). 172 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; ‘The composition of honey is of course very varied. Thus analyses give water all the way from 15 to 30 percent. The first would be fully ripe, the last hardly the product we should like to market. The reducing sugars—so called because they can reduce the sulphate of copper when made strongly alkaline by the addition of caustic potash or soda—include all vegetable sugars but sucrose of cane-sugar; and consist mainly of dextrose, which turns the ray of polarization to the right, and levulose, which turns the ray to the left. Dextrose and levulose are both pro- ducts of various fruits, as wellas honey. Dextrose and levu- lose are also called invert sugars ; because, when cane-sugaris heated with a mineral acid, like hydrochloric acid, it changes from cane-sugar. which revolves the polarized ray to the right, to dextrose and levulose; but the latter is most effective, so now the ray turns to the left, hence the terms inversion, or invert sugar. Glucose isa term which refers to both dextrose and levulose, and is synonymous with grape-sugar. Thé amount of reducing sugars varies largely, as shown by numerous analyses, usually from 65 to 75 percent; though a few analyses of what it would seem must have been pure honeys, have shown less than 60 percent. Butin such cases there was an excess of cane-sugar. It seems not improbable that in such cases honey was gathered very rapidly, and the bees not having far to fly did not fully digest the cane-sugar of the nectar. Dr. J. Campbell Brown, in a paper before the British Association, gave as an average of several analyses 73 percent of invert or reducing sugars ; 36 and 45-100 percent was levulose, and 36 and 57-100 percent was dextrose. Almost always pure honey givesa left rotation of from two to twelve degrees. This wide variation is suggestive. Does it not show that very likely the honey from certain flowers, though pure honey, may give a right-handed rotation with a large angle because of a large amount of dexttose and little levulose? It occurs to me that these two uncertain factors, incomplete digestion and the possible variation in nectar, make determi- nation by the analyst either by use of the polariscope or chemi- cal reagents a matter of doubt. I speak with more confidence, as our National Chemist pronounced several specimens of OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 173 what I feel sure were pure honey, to be probably adulterated. Ithink that now he has perfected his methods so that such mistakes would rarely occur. While nearly or quite half of the nectar of flowers is cane- sugar, there is very little of such sugar in honey. While from one to three percent is most common it not infrequently runs to five or six percent, and occasionally to twelve or sixteen per- cent. Quite likely in this last case, imperfect digestion was the cause. The nectar was not long enough in the stomach to be changed ; or else for some reason there was too little of the digestive ferment present. Of course, twelve to fifteen percent of sucrose would almost surely rotate the plane to the right. There is a very interesting field for study here. What flowers yield nectar so rich in cane-sugar that even the honey is rich in the same element? Honey often contains, we are told, as much as four percent of dextrine. This, of course, tends to make it rotate the ray to the right, and further complicates the matter. Again, it is easy to see that in case flowers secrete nectar in large quantities the bees would load quickly, and so proportionately less saliva would be mixed with it, and digestion would be less thorough. We see now why drones and queens need salivary glands to yield the ferment to digest honey. Often the worker-bees do not thoroughly digest it. We see, too, why honey is such an excellent food. We have to digest all our cane-sugar. The honey we eat has been largely digested for us. Albuminoids—evidently from the pollen—vary from five to seventy-five hundredths of one percent. These vary largely according to the flowers. It is quite likely that in case of bloom like basswood where the honey comes very rapidly— fifteen pounds per day sometimes for each colony—the stomach- mouth can not remove all the pollen. Here is an opportunity for close observation. If we know we have honey that was gathered very rapidly, we should have a test made for albumi- nous material to see if its quantity increases with the rapidity with which the honey is gathered. While there may be quite an amount of this pollen in honey, usually there will be but little. Besides the above substances, there is a little mineral mat- 174 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; ter—fifteen hundredths of one percent—which I suppose to be mainly malate of lime; a little of the essential oils which pos- sibly give the characteristic flavor of the different kinds of honey, and more or less coloring matter, more in buckwheat honey, less in basswood. Thereis also a little acid—formic acid—which probabiy aids to digest the nectar, and possibly with the saliva, may, like the acid gastric juice of our own stomachs, resist putrefaction, or any kind of fermentation, It has been urged that this is added to the honey by the bees dropping poison from the sting. I much doubt thistheory. It is more reasonable, however, than the absurd view that the bee uses its sting to polish its cells. If the poison-glands can secrete formic acid, why can not the glands of the stomach ? Analogy, no less than common sense, favors this view. The acid of honey is often recognizable to the taste, as every lover of honey knows. The acid isalsoshown by use of blue litmus. The specific gravity varies greatly of course, as we should expect from the great variation in the amount of water. I have found very thick honey to have a specific gravity of 1.40 to150. The fact that honey is digested nectar or sucrose, shows that in eating honey our food is partially digested for us, the cane-sugar is changed to a sugar that can be readily absorbed and assimilated. I have fed bees pure cane-sugar, and, when stored, the late Prof. R. F. Kedzie found that nearly all of this sugar was transformed in much the same way that the nectar is changed which is taken from the flowers. It is probable that the large compound racemose glands in the head and thorax of the bees (Fig. 59, dhg, lg, and Fig. 61) secrete an abundant ferment which hastens these transfor- mations which the sugars undergo while in the honey-stomach of the bee. I once fed several pounds of cane-sugar syrup at night to the bees. I extracted some of this the next morning, and more after it was capped. Bothsamples were analyzed by three able chemists—Profs. Kedzie, Scovell, and Wiley—and the sample from the capped honey was found to be much bet- ter digested. This shows that the digestion continues in the comb. Much of the water escapes after the honey is stored. The method of collecting honey has already been described. OR, MANUAL OF THER APIARY. 175 The principles of lapping and suction are both involved in the operation. When the stomach is full the bee repairs to the hive and regurgitates its precious load, either giving it tothe bees or storing itin the cells. This honey remains for some time uncapped that it may ripen, in which process the water is partially evaporated, and the honey rendered thicker. If the honey remains uncapped, or is removed from the cells, it will generally granulate, if the temperature be reduced below 70 degrees. Like many other substances, most honey, if heated and sealed while hot, will not crystallize till it is unsealed. In case of granulation the sucrose and glucose crystallize in the mellose. Some honey, as that from the South, and some from California, seems to remain liquid indefinitely. Some kinds of our own honey crystallize much more readily than others. I have frequently observed that thick, ripe honey granulates more slowly than thin honey. The only sure (?) test of the purity of honey, if there be any, is that of the polariscope. This, even if decisive, is not practical except in the hands of the scientist. The most practical test is that of granulation, though this is not wholly reliable. Granulated honey is almost certainly pure. Occasionally genuine honey, and of superior excellence, refuses, even in a zero atmosphere, to crystallize. When there are no flowers, or when the flowers yield no sweets, the bees, ever desirous to add to their stores, frequently essay to rob other colonies, and often visit the refuse of cider- mills, or suck up the oozing sweets of various plant or bark lice, thus adding, may be, unwholesome food to their usually delicious and refined stores. It is a curious fact that the queen never lays her maximum number of eggs except when storing is going on. In fact, in the interims of honey-gathering, egg- laying not infrequently ceases altogether. The queen seems discreet, gauging the size of her family by the probable means of support. Oritis quite possible that the workers control affairs by withholding the chyle, and thus the queen stops per- force. Syrian bees are much more likely to continue brood- rearing when no honey is being collected than are either Ger- man or Italian bees. Again, in times of extraordinary yields of honey the stor- 176 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; ing is very rapid, and the hive becomes so filled that the queen is unable to lay her full quota of eggs; in fact, I have seen the brood very much reduced in this way, which, of course, greatly depletes the colony. This might be called ruinous prosperity. The natural use of the honey is to furnish, in part, the drones and imago worker-bees with food, and also to supply, in part at least, the queen, especially when she is not laying. WAX. The product of the bees second in importance is wax. The older scientists thought this was a product formed from pollen. Girard says it was discovered by a peasant of Lusace. Lang- stroth states that Herman C. Hornbostel discovered the true source of wax in 1745. Thorley in 1774, and Wildman in 1778, understood the true source of wax. This is a solid, unctuous substance, and is, as shown by its chemical composition, a fat- like material, though not, as some authors assert, the fat of bees. This is lighter than water, as its specific gravity is .965. The melting point is never less than 144 degrees F. Thus, it is easy to detect adulteration, as minera] wax, both paraffine and ceresin, havea less specific gravity. Paraffine also hasa much lower melting point. It isimpossible to adulterate wax with these mineral products for use as foundation. They so destroy the ductility and tenacity that the combs are almost sure to break down. Ceresin might be used, but it is distaste- ful to the bees, and foundation made from wax in which ceresin is mixed would have novalue. Only pure beeswax is used in manufacturing foundation in the United States. I have this on the authority of Mr. A. I. Root, whose dictum in such matters is conclusive. As already observed, wax is a secretion from the glands just within the wax-plates, and is formed in scales, the shape of an irregular pentagon (Fig. 72, w) underneath the abdomen. These scales are light-colored, very thin and fragile, and are secreted by the wax-gland as a liquid, which passes through the wax-plate by osmosis, and solidifies as thin wax-scales on the outside of the plates opposite the glands. Neighbour speaks of wax oozing through pores from the stomach. This is not the case, but, like the synovial fluid about our own OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 177 joints, itis formed by the secreting membrane, and does not pass through holes, as water througha sieve. There ‘are, as already stated, four of these wax-pockets on each side (Fig. 72), and thus there may be eight wax-scales on a bee ata time. This wax can be secreted by the bees when fed on pure sugar, as shown by Huber, whose experiment I have verified. I removed all honey and comb froma strong colony, left the bees for twenty-four hours to digest all food which might be in their stomachs, and then fed pure sugar, which was better than honey, as Prof. R. F. Kedzie has shown by analysis that not only filtered honey, but even the nectar which he collected right from the flowers themselves, contains nitrogen. The bees commenced at once to build comb, and continued for sev- eral days, so long as I kept them confined. This is as we should suppose; sugar contains hydrogen and oxygen in pro- portion to form water, while the third element, carbon, is in the same, or about the same, proportion as the oxygen. Now, the fats usually contain little oxygen and a good deal of car- bon and hydrogen. Thus the sugar, by losing some of its oxygen, would contain the requisite elements for fat. It was found true in the days of slavery in the South that the negroes of Louisiana, during the gathering of the cane, would become very fat. They ate much sugar; they gained much fat. Now, wax isa fat-like substance, not that it is the animal fat of bees, as often asserted—in fact, it contains much less hydro- gen, as will be seen by the following formula from Hess: ORY PCBs scne-siseues seis team Sad thee Zerg aera sees Carbon......-....- Hydrogen —but itis a special secretion fora special purpose, and from its composition we should conclude that it might be secreted from a purely saccharine diet, and experiment confirms the conclusion. Dr. Planta has found that there is a trace of nitrogen in wax-scales, a little less than .6 of one percent, while he finds in newly made comb, nearly .9 of one percent. It has been found that bees require about twenty pounds of honey to secrete one of wax. The experiments of Mr. P. L. Viallon show this estimate of Huber to betoo great. Berlepsch says sixteen to nineteen pounds when fed on sugar without 178 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; pollen, and ten pounds when fed both. My own experiments would sustain Huber’s statement. In these experiments the bees are confined, and so the conclusions are to be received with caution. We can not know how much the results are changed by the abnormal condition in which the bees are placed. For a time nitrogenous food is not necessary to the secre- tion of wax. Probably the small amount of nitrogen in the scales and in the saliva may be furnished by the blood. This, of course, could not continue long; indeed, the general nutri- tion would be interfered with, and ill health can never do maximum work. It is asserted that to secrete wax, bees need to hang in compact clusters or festoons in absolute repose. Such quiet would certainly seem conducive to most active secretion. The food could not go to form wax, and at the same time supply the waste of tissue which ever follows upon muscular activity. The cow, put to hard toil, could not give so much milk. ButI find, upon examination, that the bees, even the oldest ones, while gathering in the honey season, yield up the wax-scales the same as those within the hive. During the active storing of the past season, especially when comb-building was in rapid progress, I found that nearly every bee taken from the flowers contained the wax-scales of varying sizes in the wax- pockets. By the activity of the bees, these are not infre- quently loosened from their position and fall to the bottom of the hive, sometimes in astonishing quantities. This explains why wax is often mentioned as an elementof honey. Its pres- ence, however, in honey is wholly accidental. It is probable that wax-secretion is not forced upon the bees, but only takes place as required. So the bees, unless wax is demanded, may perform other duties. When we fill the sections and brood- chamber wholly with foundation, it is often difficult to find any bees bearing wax-scales. In such cases I have often looked long, but in vain, to find such scales zz situ to show to my students. A newly-hived colony, with no combs or foun- dation, will show these wax-scales on nearly every bee. Whether this secretion is a matter of the bee’s will, or whether it is excited by the surrounding conditions without any OR, MANUAL, OF THH APIARY. 179 thought, are questions yet to be settled. No comb necessitates quiet. With us and all other higher animals, quiet and heavy food-taking favors fat deposits. May not the same in bees conduce to wax-production ? ‘These wax-scales are loosened by the wax-jaws of the pos- terior legs, carried to their anterior claws, which in turn bear them to the mouth, where they are mixed with saliva probably from Wolff’s glands (Fig. 60), or mixed saliva. After the proper kneading by the jaws, these wax-scales are fashioned into that wonderful and exquisite structure, the comb. In this transformation to comb, the wax may become colored. This is due toaslight admixture of pollen or old wax. It is almost sure to be colored if the new comb is formed adjacent to old, dark-colored comb. In such cases chippings from the old soiled comb are used. Honey-comb is wonderfully delicate, the base of a new cell being, according to Prof. C. P. Gillette, in worker-comb, be- tween .0032 and .0064 of an inch, and the drone between .0048 and .008. The walls are even thinner, varying, he says, from -0018 to .0028 of an inch. Thecells areso formed as to com- bine the greatest strength and maximum capacity with the least expense of material. It need hardly be said that queen- cells are much thicker, and contain, as before stated, much that is not wax. In the arch-like pits in queen-cells, we farther see how strength is conserved and material economized. Honey-comb has been an object of admiration since the earliest time. Some claim that the form is a matter of neces- sity—the result of pressure or reciprocal resistance and not of bee-skill. The fact that the hexagonal form is sometimes assumed just as the cell is started, when pressure or resistance could not aid, has led me to doubt this view; especially as wasps form their paper nests of soft pulp, and the hexagonal cells extend to the edge, where no pressure or resistance could affect the form of the cells. Yet I am not certain that the mutual resistance of the cells, as they are fashioned from the soft wax, may not determine the form. Mullenhoff seems to have proved that mutual resistance of the cells causes the hexagonal form. ‘The bees certainly carve out the triangular pyramid at the base. They would need to be no better geome- 180 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; tricians to form the hexagonal cells. The assertion that the cells of honey-comb are absolutely uniform and perfect is untrue, as a little inspection will convince any one. The late Prof. J. Wyman demonstrated that an exact hexagonal cell does not exist. He alsoshowed that the size varies, so that in a distance of ten worker-cells there may bea variation of one cell in diameter, and this in natural, not distorted, cells. Any one who doubts can easily prove, by a little careful examina- tion, that Prof. Wyman was correct. This variation of one- fifth of an inch in ten cells is extreme, but variation of one- Fic 77. ww Irregular Cells, (modified) from Cowan. tenth of aninchis common. The sides, as also the angles, are notconstant. The rhombic faces forming the bases of the cells alsovary. The idea which has come down from the past that mathematics and measurement exactly agreed upon the angles of the rhombs, that the two opposite obtuse angles were each 109° 28’ 16’’ and the acute 70° 31’ and 44’ is without foun- dation infact. Mr. Cowan figures (Fig. 77) triangular, quad- rangular, and even cells with seven sides. Of course, such deformity is very rare. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 181 The bees change from worker (Fig. 78, c) to drone cells (Fig. 78, a), which are one-fifth larger, and vice versa, not by any system (Fig. 78, 6), but simply by enlarging or contract- ing. It usually takes about four rows to complete the transfor- Fic. 78. Rhombs, Pyramidal Bases and cross-sections of cells. —Illustrated. Honey-Comb.— after Duncan. a Drone-cells. ec Worker-cells, b Deformed cells, dd Queen-cells, mation, though the number of deformed cells varies from two, very rarely one, to eight. The perfect drone-cells may be, often are, contiguous to perfect worker-cells, the irregular cells being used to fill out the necessary irregularities. AnEnglish 182 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; writer criticises Langstroth’s representation of these irregular cells, and adds that the angles can never be less than 100 degrees. Thisis far from the truth, as I have found many cells where an angle was considerably less than this. Mr. Cowan, in his excellent ‘‘ Honey-Bee,’’ describes and figures cells where the angle is even acute. The structure of each cell is quite complex, yet full of interest. The base is a triangular pyramid (Fig. 78, ¢), whose three faces are rhombs (Mr. Cowan has found and photo- graphed cells with four faces), and whose apex forms the very center of the floor of the cell. From the six free or non- adjacent edges of the three rhombs extend the lateral walls or faces of the cell. The apex of this basal pyramid is a point where the contiguous faces of the three cells on the opposite side meet, and form the angles of the bases of three cells on the opposite side of the comb. ‘Thus the base of each cell forms one-third of the base of three opposite cells. One side thus braces the other, and adds much to the strength of the comb. Each cell, then, is in the form of a hexagonal prism, terminating in a flattened triangular pyramid. The bees usually build several combs at, once, and carry forward several cells on each side of each comb, constantly adding to the number, by additions to the edge. ‘The bees, in constructing comb, make the base er so-called mid-rib, the “‘fish-bone ’’ in honey where foundation is used, thick at first, and thin this as they add to the cells in lengthening them. Prof. C. P. Gillette demon&Strated this by coloring foundation black. The color reached nearly tothe end of the cell, and extended an inch below the foundation. Thus we understand why bees take so kindly to foundation. To work this out is not contrary to their instincts, and gives thema lift. Huber first observed the process of comb-building, noticing the bees abstract the wax-scales, carry them to the mouth, add the frothy saliva, and then knead and draw out the yellow ribbons which were fastened to the top of the hive, or added to the comb already commenced. The diameter of the worker-cells (Fig. 78, c) averages little more than one-fifth of an inch—Reaumur says two and three- fifths lines, or twelfths of an inch—while the drone-cells (Fig. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 183 78, a) area little more than one-fourth of an inch, or, according to Reaumur, three and one-third lines. But this distinguished author was quite wrong when he said: ‘‘ These are the in- variable dimensions of all cells that ever were or ever will be made.’’ A recent English author, after stating the diameter of cells, adds: ‘The statement many times made that twenty-five and sixteen of these, respectively, cover a square inch, is erroneous, as they are not square.’’ He says there are 28 13-15 and 18 178-375. I find the worker-cells per square inch vary from 25 to 29, and the drone-cells from 16 to 19 per square inch. The drone-cells, I think, vary more in size than do the worker-cells. The depth of the worker-cells is a little less than half an inch; the drone-cells are slightly extended, so as to be a little more than half an inch deep. Thus worker- comb is seven-eighths and drone-comb one and one-fourth inches thick. This depth, even of brood-cells, varies, so we: can not give exact figures. Thecellsare often drawn out so as to be an inch long, when used solely as honey receptacles. Such cells are often very irregular at the end, and sometimes two are joined. The number of cells in a pound of comb will vary much, of course, as the thickness of the comb is not uni- form. This number will vary from thirty to fifty thousand. In capping the honey the bees commence at the outside of each cell and finish at the center. The capping of the brood- cells is white and convex. The capping of honey-cells is made thicker by black bees than by the other races, and so their comb honey is more beautiful. Another reason for the whiter color comes from a small air-chamber just beneath the capping. The inner surface of the capping is, therefore, usually free from honey. This chamberis usually a little larger in the honey-comb of black bees. The cappings are strengthened by tiny braces of wax, which, as we should expect, are most pronounced in drone-comb. The strength of comb is something marvelous. I have known a frame of comb honey eleven inches square to weigh eleven pounds, and yet to be unsupported at the bottom, and for not more than one-third of the distance from the top on the sides, and yet it held securely. The dangerin cold weather, from breaking, is greater,as then the comb is very brittle. 184 THE BEE-KEEPER'’S GUIDE; Prof. Gillette has found that comb one inch thick will weigh only from one-twentieth to one twenty-fifth the weight of the honey which it may hold. The character of the cells, as to size, that is, whether they are drone or worker, seems to be determined by the relative abundance of beesand honey. If the bees are abundant and honey needed, or if there is no queen to lay eggs, drone-comb (Fig. 78, a) is invariably built, while if there are few bees, and of course little honey needed, then worker-comb (Fig. 78, c) is Fic. 79 Honey-Comb Coral,—Original. almost invariably formed. It is also a curious fact that if the queen keeps along with the comb-builders in the brood-cham- ber, then no drone-comb is built; but let her fail to keep cells occupied, and drone-comb is at once formed. It would seem that the workers reasoned thus: We are going to have comb for storing, for such we better fashion the large celled or drone-comb. All comb, when first formed, is clear and translucent. The fact that it is often dark and opaque implies that it has been long used as brood-comb, and the opacity is due to the innu- merable thin glue-like cocoons which line the cells. This may OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 185 be separated by dissolving the wax; which may be done by putting it in boiling alcohol, or, better still, by use of the solar wax-extractor,. Such comb need not be discarded, for if com- posed of worker-cells it is still very valuable for breeding pur- poses, and should not be destroyed till the cells are too small for long service, which will not occur till after many years of use. The function, then, of the wax, is to make comb and Fic. 80. Honey-Comb Coral,—Original. caps for the honey-cells, and, combined with pollen, to form queen-cells (Fig. 78, d) and caps for the brood-cells. A very common fossil found in many parts of the Kastern and Northern United States is, from its appearance, often called petrified honey-comb. We have many such specimens in our museum. In some cases the cells are hardly larger than a pin-head; in others a quarter of an inch in diameter. These (Figs. 79, 80) are not fossil honey-comb as many are led to believe, though the resemblance is so striking that no won- 186 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE} der the public generally are deceived. These specimens are fossil coral, which the paleontologist places in the genus Favosites; favosus being a common species in the Northern United States. They are very abundantin the lime rockin northern Michigan, and are very properly denominated honey- comb coral. The animals of which these were once the skele- tons, so to speak, are not insects at all, though often called so by men of considerable information. The species of the genus Favosites first appeared in the Upper Silurian rocks, culminated in the Devonian, and dis- appeared in the early Carboniferous. No insects appeared till the Devonian age, and no Hymenoptera—bees, wasps, etc.— till after the Carboniferous. So the old-time Favositid reared its limestone columns and helped to build islands and conti- nents untold ages—millions upon millions of years—before any flower bloomed, or any bee sipped the precious nectar. In some specimens of this honey-comb coral (Fig. 80) there are to be seen banks of cells, much resembiing the paper-nests of some of our wasps. This might be called wasp-comb coral, except that both styles were wrought by the self-same animals. POLLEN OR BEE-BREAD. An ancient Greek author states that in Hymettus the bees tied little pebbles to their legs to hold them down. This fan- ciful conjecture probably arose from seeing the pollen-balls on the bees’ legs. Even such scientists as Reaumur, Bonnet, Swammerdam, and many apiarists of the last century, thought they saw in these pollen-balls the sourceof wax. But Huber, John Hunter, Duchet, Wildman, and others already referred to, noticed the presence and function of the wax-scales already described, and were aware that the pollen served a different purpose. This substance, like mectar, is not secreted nor manufac- tured by the bees, only collected. The pollen-graius form the male elementin plants. They are in plants what the sperma- tozoa or sperm-cells are in animals; and as the sperm-cells are much more numerous than theeggs or germ-cells, so pollen- grains are far more numerous in plants than are the ovules or « OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 187 seeds. In Chinese wistaria, Wistaria sinensis, there are, says Goodale, about 7,000 pollen-grains to each ovule. The color of pollen is usually yellow ; but we often find it orange, reddish, nearly white, andin several Giliasin California it is bright blue. Pollen-grains are really single cells, and have two coats; the outer is the extine, which may be smooth, variously sculptured, or even thickly set with spines (Fig. 81). These spines, as also the color, often enable us to tell the species of plant from which the pollen came. Usually the extine is per- Fic. 81. Pollen-Grains, from A. I. Root Co. forated, though the inner wall—intine—is not. These perfora- tions are also definite in number within the species. These holes give opportunity for the pollen-tubes (Fig. 252, 7) to push out after the pollen-grain reaches the stigma of the flower. Where there are no perforations of the extine, the wall breaks. In some cases like orchids, pollen-grains are held together by an adhesive substance. In our milkweeds we notice a similar grouping of pollen-grains (Fig. 227) which often are very dis- turbing to bees and other insects. The composition of pollen, says Goodale, is protoplasmic 188 THE BEE-KEKEPER’S GUIDE; matter, granular food materials, such as starch and oil and dissolved food matters, sugar and dextrine. Dr. A. de Planta gives the following analysis of pollen of the hazel (B. B. Journal, Vol. XIV, p. 269). He finds proto- plasm, oils and starch—the important food elements. Before drying he found : After drying thoroughly he found : Nitrogenous Matter Non-nitrogenous............----..455 AUSH, sane geoiceees shaqcnins sent yr He found no reducing sugar, but did find 14.70 percent of cane-sugar. As will be seen, pollen, like our grains, is rich in the albuminoids. Like our grains, or even different specimens of the same grain, the composition of pollen will doubtless vary to quite an extent. As we note that pollen contains besides an ash, albuminoids, sugar, starch, and oils, we understand its excellence as a food; it contains within itself all the impor- tant food elements. The bees usually obtain it from the stamens of flowers; but if they gain access to flour when there is no bloom, they will take this in lieu of pollen, in which case the former term used above becomes a misnomer, though usually the bee-bread consists wholly of pollen. I have also known bees to gather extensively for bee-bread from the com- mon raspberry rust. Very likely the spores of others of these fungi or low vegetables help to supply this nutritious sub- stance. Occasionally there is a drouth of bee-bread alike in hive and flowers, then bees will seek this kind of food in meal or flour box or bin. Hence, the wisdom of feeding rye-flour which the bees will readily take if it is needed. Flour may be added to candy and fed to bees. As already intimated, the pollen is conveyed in the pollen- baskets (Fig. 70) of the posterior legs, to which it is conveyed by the other legs, as already described, page 154, and com- pressed into little oval masses. The motionsin this convey- ance are exceedingly rapid, and are largely performed while OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 189 the bee ison the wing. The bees not infrequently come to the hives not only with replete pollen-baskets, but with their whole under-surface thoroughly dusted. Dissection will also show that the same bee may have her sucking stomach dis- tended with honey, though this is rare. Thus the bees make the most of their opportunities. Itisa curious fact, noticed even by Aristotle, that the bees, during any trip, almost always gather only a single kind of pollen, or gather ouly from one species of bloom. Hence, while different bees may have different colors of pollen, the pellets of bee-bread on any single bee will be uniform in color throughout. It is possible that the material is more easily collected and compacted when homogeneous. It seems more probable that they prefer the pollen of certain plants, and work on such species so long as they yield the desired food, though it may bea matter of sim- ple convenience. From this fact we see why bees cause no intercrossing of species of plants; they only intermix the pollen of different plants of the same species. The pollen is usually deposited in the small or worker cells, and is unloaded bya scraping motion of the posterior legs, the pollen-baskets being first lowered into the cells. The bee thus freed, leaves the wheat-like masses to be packed by other bees, which is packed by pushing with the head. The cells, which may or may not have the samecolor of pollen throughout, are never filled quite to the top, and not infre- quently the same cell may contain both pollen and honey. Such a condition is easily ascertained by holding the comb between the eye andthe sun. Ifthereis no pollen it will be wholly translucent ; otherwise there will be opaque patches. A little experience will make this determination easy, even if the comb is old. Combs in small sections, especially if sep- arators are used, are not likely to receive pollen or be used for breeding. It is often stated that queenless colonies gather no pollen, but itis not true, though they gather less.than they otherwise would. It is probable that pollen, at least when honey is added, contains all the essential elements of animal food. It certainly contains the very important principle which is not found in pure nectar or honey—nitrogenous material. I do not think the bee-moth larva will destroy 190 THE BEE-KEEPHR’S GUIDE 3 combs that are entirely destitute of pollen, surely not unless they have been long used as brood-combs. The intruder must have proteid food. The function of bee-bread is to furnish albuminous food to all the bees, adults no less than larve. As already stated, brood-rearing is impossible without it. And though it is cer- tainly not essential to the nourishment of the adult bees when in repose, it still may be so, and unquestionably is, in time of activelabor. This point is clearly proved from the fact that pollen-husks are almost always found in the intestines of bees. We may say it feedsthe tissues of the imago bees, and is necessary that the workers may form the food for the queen, drones and larve. Schonfeld thinks the bees must have it in winter, and in case no bee-bread is in the combs, he thinks the bees scrape it from thecells and old combs. I believe bees often winter better when there is no pollen in the hive. PROPOLIS OR BEE-GLUE. This substance, also called bee-glue, is collected as the bees collect pollen, andis not made or secreted. It is the pro- duct of various resinous buds,and may be seen to glisten on the opening buds of the hickory and horse-chestnut, where it frequently serves the entomologist by capturing small insects. From. such sources, from the oozing gum of various trees, from varnished furniture, and from old propolis about unused hives that have previously seen service, do the bees secure their glue. Probably the gathering of bees about coffins to collect the gluefrom the varnish, led to the custom of rap- ping on the hives to inform the bees, in case of a death in the family, that they might join as mourners. This custom still prevails, as I understand, in some parts of the South. Propolis has great adhesive force, and though soft and pliable when warm becomes very hard and unyielding when cold. The use of bee-glue is to cement the combs to their sup- ports, to fill up all rough places inside the hive, to seal up all crevices except the place of exit, which the bees often contract by aidof propolis, and even to cover any foreign substance that can not be removed. Intruding snails have thus been imprisoned inside the hive. Reaumur founda snail thus in- cased ; Maraldi a slug similarly entombed; while I have myself OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 191 observed a Bombus, which had been stripped by the bees of wings, hair, etc., in their vain attempts at removal, also en- cased in this unique style of a sarcophagus, fashioned by the bees. Alcohol, benzine, gasoline, ether, and chloroform are all ready solvents of bee-glue, and will quickly remove it from the hands, clothing, etc. Boiling in water with concentrated lye will remove propolis completely. Even steam and hot water used as a spray have been found to do the same. PARTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY. For very full lists of books, etc., see Packard’s Text-Book of Entomology. Alley, Henry—Thirty Years Among the Bees, 1880, and Queen- Rearing, 1883. Adair, D. L.—Annals of Bee-Keeping, 1872. Amans, Dr.—Essai sur le vol des Insectes, 1883. Ballantine, Rev Wm.—Bee-Culture, 1884. ‘¢ Bee-Master,’’—The Times Bee-Keeping, 1864. Benton, Frank—The Honey-Bee, 1899. Berger, —.—Untersuchungen uber den Bau des Gehirnes und der Retina der Arthropoden, 1873. Berlepsch, A. Baron von—Die Biene und ihre Zucht, 1873. Bevan, Dr. K.—The Honey-Bee, 1838. Blanchard, F.—Recherches anatomique sur le systeme nerveux les Insectes, 1846. De la circulation dans les Insectes, 1848. Du grand sympathique chez les Animaux articules, 1858. Bonnet, C.—Cuvres d’histoire naturelle, 1779-1783. Bonnier, G.—Les Nectaires, 1879. Bordas, L.—Glandes salivaries des Apides, Apis mellifica, (Comptes rendus Acad. Sci. Paris,) 1894. Appareil glandu- laire des Hymenopteres (Ann. Soc Nat. Zool. Paris,) 1894. Brandt, E.—Comparative Anatomy of the Nerve System of Insects (in Russian,) 1878. ; Briant, T. J.—Notes on the Antenne of the Honey-Bee (Jour. Linn. Soc.,) 1883. ’ On the Anatomy and Functions of the Tongue of the Honey-Bee (Jour. Linn. Soc.,) 1884, Antenne of Honey-Bee (Jour. Linn. Soc.,) 1885. British Bee Journal—1873 to 1889. Present Editor, T. W. Cowan, F.L.S., etc. Brougham, Lord H.—Observations, Demonstrations, and Ex- periments upon the Structure of the Cells of Bees (Natural Theology,) 1856. Buchner, L.—Mind in Animals, 1880. Burmeister, H.—Handbuch der Entomologie, 1832. 192 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; Butschli, O.—Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Biene, 1870. Cameron, P.—On Parthenogenesis in the Hymenoptera (Trans. Nat. Hist. Soc. of Glasgow,) 1888. Chambers, V. T.—On the Tongue of some Hymenoptera (Jor. Nat. Hist. Soc. Cincin.,) 1874. Cheshire—Bees and Bee-Keeping, two volumes, 1886. Claparede, E.—Morphologie des zusammengesetzten Anges bei den Arthropoden (Zeit. fur Wiss. Zool.,) 1860. Clute, Dr. O.—Blessed Bees, 1878. Collin, Abbe—Guide du proprietaire d’ Abeilles, 1878. Comstock, H. J.—Manual for the Study of Insects, 1895. Re- cent and authoritative. Cowan, T. W.—The Honey-Bee, 1890. Very accurate and full. Bee-Keeper’s Guide Book, 1881. Dadant, Chas. and Son—Langstroth on the Honey-Bee, 1899. Dahl, F.— Archiv. f. Naturg., 1884, pp. 146-193. Darwin, C.—Origin of Species, 1859, 1872, 1878. Debeauvoys, M.—L Apiculteur, 1853. Dewitz, H.—Vergleichende Untersuchungen uber Bau und Ent- wickelung des Stachels der Honigbiene, 1874. Doolittle, G. M.—Scientific Queen-Rearing, 1889. Donhoff, Dr.—Bienenzeitung, 1851-1854. Dufour, Leon—Memo. pres. par divers savants a 1l’Acad. des Sci. de 1’Inst. de France. Tome VII. Dujardin, F.—Memoire sur le systeme nerveux des Insectes, 1851. Observations sur les Abeilles, 1852 Dumas et Milne Edwards—Sur la production de la cire des _ Abeilles, 1843-1844. Duthiers, L.—Recherches sur l’armure genitale des Insectes (Ann des Scien. Nat.,) 1848-1852. Dzierzon, Dr.—Bienenzeitung, 1845-1854, ‘Theorie und Praxis des neuen Bienenfreundes, 1849-1852. Rational Bee-Keeping. English translation by Dieck and Stutterd, 1882. Erichson—De fabrica et usu antennarum in Insectis, 1847. Exner, S.—Ueber das Sehen von Bewegungen und die Theorie des zusammengesetzten Auges, 1875. Die Frage der Functionsweise der Facettenaugen (Biol. Centralblatt,) 1880, 1882. ¥iguier, L.—The Insect World, translated by P. Martin Dun- can, 1872. Fischer, G.—Bienenzeitung, 1871. Geddes, Prof. Patrick and J. A. Thomson—The Evolution of Sex, 1889. Girard, M.—Sur la chaleur libre degagee par les animaux in- vertebres et specialement les Insectes, 1869. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 193 Traite elementaire d’Entomologie, 1873. Les Abeilles, organes et fonctions, 1878. Girdwoyn, M.—Anatomie et physiologie de 1’Abeille, 1876. Gottsche, C. M.—Beitrag zur Anat. und Physiol. des Auges der Fliegen, etc. (Mull. Arch. fur Anat.,) 1852. Graber, Dr. V.—Ueber die Blutkorperchen der Insekten, 1871. Ueber den propulsatorischen Apparat der Insekten, 1872. Verlaufiger Bericht uber den propulsatorischen Appa- rat der Insekten, 1872. a ta neue otocystenartige Sinnesorgane der Insekten, Die Chordotonalen Sinnesorgane und das Gehor der In- sekten (Arch. fur. Mic. Anat.,) 1882. Grassi, Dr. B.—Intorno allo sviluppo delle Api nell’ uovo, 1883, 1884, 1886. Grenacher, H.—Untersuchungen uber das Sehorgan der Arth- ropoden. 1879. Abhandlungen zur vergleichenden Anatomie des Auges, 1886. 7 Grimshaw, R. A. H.—Heredity in Bees (British Bee Journal,) 1889. Gundelach, F. W.—Die Naturgeschichte der Honigbiene, 1842. Hauser, G.—Physiologische und histologische Uatersuchungen uber das Geruchsorgan der Insekten, 1880. Haviland, J. D.—The Social Instincts of Bees, their Origin and Natural Selection, 1882. Heddon, James—Success in Bee-Culture, 1886. Helmholz—Sensations of Tone. Hicks, Dr. J. Braxton—On a new structure in the Antennz of Insects (Jour. Linn. Soc.,) 1857. On certain Sensory Organs in Insects, hitherto unde- scribed, 1860. The Honey-Bee (Samuelson and Hicks,) 1860. Hickson, Dr. S. J.—The Eye and Optic Tract of Insects (Quart. Jour. Mic. Science,) 1885. Hopkins, Isaac—Australasian Bee-Manual, 1886. Huber, F.—Nouvelles observations sur les Abeilles, 1814, (and other editions.) Hunter, J.—On Bees (Philosophical Trans.,) 1792. Manual of Bee-Keeping, 18— Hutchinson, W. Z.—Advanced Bee-Culture, 1883. Comb Honey, 1897. Hyatt, J. D.—The Structure of the Tongue of the Honey-Bee (Amer. Quart. Mic Jour.,) 1878, p. 287. The Sting of the Honey-Bee (ibid,) 1878, p. 3. The Sting of the Honey-Bee (Pop. Sc. Mon.,) 1879. Janscha, I. A.—Hinterlassene vollstandige Lehre von der Bién- enzucht, 1775. 194 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; John, Dr. Martin—Ein neu Bienen-Buchel, 1691. Jurine, Mademoiselle—Huber’s Nouvelles observations sur les Abeilles, 1792-1814. King, H.—Bee-Keepers’ Text-Book, 1883, Kirby, W.—Monographia Apum Angliae, 1802. Kirby and Spence—Introduction to Entomology. Klein, Dr. K.—Handbook for the Physiological Laboratory, 1873. Elements of Histology, 1884. Kowalevsky—Embryologische Studien an Wurmern und Arth- ropoden, 1871. Kraepelin, Dr. K.—Phys. und Hist. uber die Geruchsorgane der Insekten (Zeit. f. Wiss. Zool.,) 1880. Ueber die Mundwerkzeuge der saugenden Insekten (z6zd,) 1882. Ueber die Geruchsorgane der Gliederthiere, 1883. Krancher, Dr. O.—Der Bau der Stigmen bei der Insekten, 1881. Die dreierlei Bienenwesen, 1884. Lacordaire—Introduction a 1’Entomologie, 1861. Landois, Dr. H.—Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Schmetterlingsflugels in der Raupe und Puppe, 1871. Die ton und Stimmapparate der Insekten, 1867. Langstroth, L. L.—The Honey-Bee, 1859-1873. Latreille, P. A.—Eclaircissemens reiatifs a l’opinion de M. Huber fils, sur l’origine et l’issue exterieure de la Cire (Acad. Roy. des Sciences,) 1821. Cours d’entomologie, 1831. Leeuwenhoek, A.—Select works, translated by H. Hoole. Lefebvre, A.—Note sur le sentiment olfactif des Insectes (Ann. Soc. entom. de France,) 1838. Leuckart, Dr.—Zur Kentniss des Generationswechsels und der Parthenogenesis bei der Insekten, 1858. Leuckart, R.—Ueber Metamorphose, ungeschlechtliche Ver- mehrung, Generationswechsel, 1851. Leydig, F.—Das Auge der Gliederthiere, 1864. Zur Anatomie der Insekten (Mull. Archiv. f. Anat.,) 1859. Lhuilier, S. A. J.—Memoire sur le minimum de cire des alveoles des Abeilles, et en particulier sur un minimum minimorum relatif a cette matiere, 1781. Lowe, J.—Trans. Ent. Soc. Vol. V. pp. 547-560, 1867. Lowne, B. T.—On the Simple and Compound Eyes of Insects (Phil. Trans.,) 1879. On the Compound Vision and the Morphol. of the Hye in Insects (Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond.,) 1884. Lubbock, Sir J.—Ants, Bees and Wasps, 1882. The Senses, Instincts and Intelligence of Animals, 1889. Lucas, I. G.—Entwurf eines wissenschaftlichen Systems fur- Bienenzucht, 1808. Lucas, M. H.—Cas de cyclopie observe chez un insecte Hymen- optere (Apis mellifica,) 1868. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 195 Lyonet, Pieter—Traite anatomique de la chenille qui ronge Le bois de saule, etc., 1762. Macloskie, G.—The Endocranium and Maxillary Suspensorium of the Bee (Amer. Natural, pp. 567-573,) 1884. Maraldi, G. F.—Observations sur les Abeilles (Mem. Acad. des Sciences,) 1712. Marey, E. J.—Animal Mechanism: A Treatise on Terrestrial and Aerial Locomotion, 1883. Mayer, Dr. Paolo—Sopra certi Organi di Senso nelle Antenne dei Ditteri, 1878-79. Meckel, H.—Muller’s Archiv. fur Anatomie, 1846. Miller, Dr. C. C.—A Year Among the Bees, 1888. Milne-Edwards—Manual of Zoology, 1863. Monfet,T.—Insectorum sine minimorum animalium Theatrum, 1634. Mullenhoff, Dr. K.—Formation of Honey-Comb (Pfluger’s Archiv f. gesammt. Physiol., XXXII, pp. 589-618,) 1883. Structure of the Honey-Bee’s Cell (Arch. f. Anat. und Physiol., pp. 371-375,) 1886. Muller, J.—Zur vergleichenden Physiologie des Gesichtsinnes, 1826. Fortgesetzte anatomische Untersuchungen uber den Bau der Augen bei den Insekten und Crustaceen, 1829. Munn, N. A.—Bevan on the Honey-Bee, 1870. Neighbour, Alfred—The Apiary, 1878. Newman, Thomas G.—Bees and Honey, 1892. Newport, G.—On the Respiration of Insects, 1836. Insects (Todd’s Cyclopedia, Anat. and Phys.,) 1839. Article ‘Insecta,’ in Todd’s Cyclopedia of Anat. and Physiol., Vol. II, p. 980, 1839. On the Uses of the Antennz of Insects (Trans. Ent. Soc.,) 1837-40. On the Structure and Development of Blood (An. of Nat. Hist., XV., pp. 281-284,) 1845. On the Temperature of Insects, and its Connection with the Functions of Respiration and Circulation, 1837. Extracts from Essay in Martin Duncan’s Transforma-., tion of Insects. Packard, Dr. A. S.—A Text-Book of Entomology, 1898. Very full and excellent. Guide to the Study of Insects, 1869. Pancritius, Paul.—Beitrage zur Kentniss der Flugelentwick- lung bei den Insekten, 1884. Parker & Haswell—Text-Book of Zoology, 1897. Perez, J.—Bulletin de 1a Soc.d’ Apicul. de la Gironde, 1878-1880 Les Abeilles, 1889. ag) Ed—Memoire sur le siege de 1’odorat dans les Articules, 1850. 196 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE} Pettigrew, J. Bell—On the Mechanical Appliances by which Flight is attained in the Animal Kingdom (Trans. Linn. Soc.,) 1870. Plateau, F.—Palpes des Insectes broyeurs (Bul. de la Soc. Zool. de France,) 1885. Recherches exp. sur la vision chez les Arthropodes (Comptes Rendus de la Soc. Ent. de Belg.,) 1887, (Bull. de VAcad. Roy. de Belgique,) 1888. Planta, Dr. A. von—Die Brutdeckel der Bienen (Schweitz. Bienenzeitung and Bul. d’Apic. de la Suisse Romande,) 1884. Coloration de la cire des Abeilles (Revue Internationale, ) 1885. Ueber die zugammensetzung einiger Nektar Arten (Brit. Bee Jour., Nectar and Honey,) 1886. Ueber den Futtersaft der Bienen, 1888. Nochmals uber den Futtersaft der Bienen (Schweitz. Bienenzeitung,) 1889. Pollmann, Dr. A.—Die Biene und ihre Zucht, 1875. Porter, C. J.—American Naturalist, XVII, p. 1238, 1883. Quinby, M.—-Mysteries of Bee-Keeping, 1885. Ramdohr, T. C.—Kleine Abhandlungen aus der Anatom. und Physiol. der Insecten, 1811, 1813. Ranvier—Lecons sur l’histologie du systeme nerveux, 1878. Ratzeburg, Dr. J. T. C.—Untersuchung des Geschlecatszus- tandes bei den sogenannten Neutris der Bienen, 1833. Reaumur, R. A. F.—Memoires pour servir a l'histoire des In- sectes, 1734-1742. English Translation, 1744. Reid, Dr.—The Honey-Bee, by E. Bevan, p. 388, 1838. Rehberg, A.—Ueber die Entwicklung des Insectenflugels, 1886. Rendu, V.—L’intelligence des Betes, 1864. Rombouts, Dr. J. E.—Locomotion of Insects on smooth Sur- faces (Amer. Mon. Mic. Jour.,) 1884. Root, A. I.—A BC of Bee-Culture, 1890. Root, L. C.—Quinby’s Mvsteries of Bee-Keeping, 1884. Schiemenz, P.—Uber das Herkommen des Futtersaftes und die Speicheldrusen der Biene, nebst einem Anhange uber das Riechorgan, 1883. Schindler, E.—Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Malpighi’schen Gefasse der Insekten, 1878. Schirach, A. G.—Physikalische Untersuchung der bisher un- bekannten aber nachher entdeckten Erzeugung d. Bienen- mutter, 1767. Schonfeld, Pastor—Bienenzeitung, 1854-1883. Illustrierte Bienenzeitung, 1885-1890. The Mouth of the Stomach in the Bee (British Bee Journ.,) 1883. Schultze, M.—Untersuch. uber die zusammengesetzten Augen der Krebsen und Insekten, 1868. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 197 Sedgwick-Minot—Recherches histologique sur les trachees de V’Hydrophilus piceus (Arch. de Physiol. Paris,) 1876. Shuckard, W. E..—British Bees, 1866. Siebold, Dr. C. T. E. von—On a True Parthenogenesis in Moths and Bees, 1857. Bienenzeitung, 1872. Ueber die Stimm und Gehororgane der Krebse und In- sekten (Arch. fur Mic. Anat.,) 1860. Simmermacher, G.—Untersuchungen uber Haftapparate an ‘Tarsalgliedern von Insekten, 1884. Smith, Dr. J. B.—Economic Entomology, 1896. Straus-Durckheim, H.—L,’Anatomie comparee des animaux articules, 1828. Swammerdam, J.—Biblia Naturae, (in Dutch, German and English,) 1737-1752. Tegetmeier, W. B.—On the Formation of Cells (Rep. Brit. As- soc., pp. 132, 133,) 1858. On the Cells of the Honey-Bee (Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., p. 34,) 1859. ‘Thorley, J.—Melissologia ; or the Female Monarchy, 1744-1765. ees eae ae ae of the Silkworm. (In Russian) 1879. Tinker, G. L.—Bee-Keeping for Profit, 1880. Treviranus, G. R.—Vermischte Schriften, 1817, and Zeitsch. fur Physiol., 1829. Treviranus, L. Ch.—Medizinische Zoologie, 1833. Viallanes, H.—Recherches sur les terminaisons nerveuses mot- rices dans les muscles stries des Insectes, 1881. Vogel, F. W.—Die Honigbiene und die Vermehrung der Bien- envolker, 1880. Waterhouse, G. R.—On the Formation of the Cells of Bees and Wasps, 1864. Weismann, A.—Zeitschrift f. Wissenschaft. Zool., 1863. Westwood’s Introduction to the Study of Insects, 1840. Wolff, Dr. O. J. B.—Das Riechorgan der Biene (Nova acta der K.L. Arch. Deutsch. Akad. d. Naturf.,) 1875. Wyman, Dr. J.—Notes on the Cells of the Bee, 1866. Zoubareff, A.—Concerning an Organ of the Bee not yet de- scribed, (Brit. Bee Jour.,) 1883. PART SECOND. ~ THE APIARY: ITS CARE AND MANAGEMENT. MOTTO -—" Keep all colonies strong.” INTRODUCTION TO PART II. STARTING AN APIARY. In apiculture, as in all other pursuits, it is all-important to make a good beginning. This demands preparation on the part of the apiarist, the procuring of bees, and location of the apiary. PREPARATION. Before starting in the business, the prospective bee-keeper should inform himself in the art. : READ A GOOD MANUAL, To do this, he should procure some good manual, and thoroughly study, especially that portion which treats of the practical part of the business. If accustomed to read, think and stady, ke should carefully read the whole work, but other- wise he will avoid confusion by only studying the methods of practice, leaving the principles and science to strengthen, and be strengthened by, his experience. Unless a student, he would better not take a journal tillhe begins the actual work, as so much unclassified information, without any experience to correct, arrange and select, will but mystify. For the same reason he may well be content with reading a single work till experience, and a thorough study of this one, make him more able to discriminate ; and the same reasoning will preclude his taking more than one bee-journal until he has had at feast a year’s actual experience. VISIT SOME APIARIST. In this work of self-preparation, he will find great aid in visiting the nearest successful andintelligent apiarist. If suc- cessful, such a one will have a reputation; if intelligent, he will take the journals, and will show by his conversation that 202 THER BRE-KEHPER'S GUIDE ; he knows the methods and views of his brother apiarists, and, above all, he will not thin’: he /nows if all, and that his is the only way to success. If possible he should spend some weeks during the active season with such a bee-keeper, and should learn all he could of such a one, but always let judgment and common sense sit as umpire, that no plans or decisions may be made that judgment does not fully sustain. TAKE A COLLEGH COURSE. It will be most wise to take a course in some college, if age makes this practicable, where apiculture is thoroughly discussed. Here one wili rot only get the best training in his chosen business, as he will study, see and handle, and thus will have the very best aids to decide as to methods, system and apparatus, but will also receive that general culture which will greatly enhance life’s pleasures and usefulness, and which ever proves the best capitalin any vocation. At the Michigan Agricultural College there is a fully equipped apiary, and the opportunities for special study in bee-keeping and entomology are peculiarly good. Michigan is not ex- ceptional. DECIDE ON A PLAN. After such a course as suggested above, it will be easy to decide as to location, hives, style of honey to produce, and: general system of management. But here, asin all the arts, all our work should be preceded by a well-digested plan of operations. As with the farmer and the gardener, only he who works to a plan can hope for the best success. Of course, such plans will vary as we grow in wisdom and experience. A good maxim to govern all plans is, ‘‘Go slow.’’ A good rule which, will insure the above, ‘‘Pay as you go.’’ Make the api- ary pay for allimprovements in advance. Demand that each year’s credits exceed its debits; and that you may surely accomplish this keep an accurate account of all your receipts andexpenses. This willbe a great aid in arranging the plans for each successive year’s operations. Above all, avoid hobbies, and be slow to adopt sweeping changes. ‘Prove all things, hold fast that which is good.” OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 203 HOW 10 PROCURE FIRST COLONIES. To procure colonies from which to form an apiary, as is in almost all kindred cases, it is always best to get them near at hand. We thus avoid the shock of transportation, can see the bees before we purchase, and in case there is any seeming mistake can easily gain a personal explanation and securea speedy adjustment of any real wrong. KIND OF BEES TO PURCHASE. Atthe same price always take Italians or Carniolans, as they are certainly best for the beginner. If common black bees can be secured for three, or even for two dollars less per colony, by all means take them, as they can be Italianized at a profit for the difference in cost, and,in the operation, the young apiarist will gain valuable experience. Our motto will demand that we purchase only strong colo- nies. If, as recommended, the purchaser sees the colonies before the bargain isclosed, it will be easy to know that the colonies are strong. If the bees, as they come rushing out, remind you of Vesuvius at her best, or bring to mind the gush and rush at the nozzle of the fireman’s hose, then buy. In the hives of such colonies all combs will be covered by the middle of May with bees, and in the honey season brood will be abun- dant. Itisalways wisest to begin ina small way. He will generally succeed best who commences with not more than four or five colonies. IN WHAT KIND OF HIVES. As plans are already made, of course it is settled as to the style of hive to be used. If bees can be procured in such hives they will be worth just as much more than though in any other hive, as it costs to make the hive and transfer the bees. This will certainly be as muchas two or three dollars. No apiarist will tolerate, unless for experiment, two styles of hives in his apiary. Therefore, unless you find bees in such hives as you are to use, it will be best to buy them in box-hives if possible and transfer (see Chapter VII) to your own hives, as bees in box-hives can always be bought at reducedrates. In case the person from whom you purchase will take the hives 204 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; back at a fair rate, after you have transferred the bees to your own hives, then purchase in any style of movable-comb hive, as it is easier to transfer from a movable-comb hive than from a box-hive. Some bee-keepers, who were willing to wait, have purchased a queen and bees by the pound, and thus secured colonies at very slight expense. A single pound of bees with a queen will develop into a good colony in a single year. WHEN TO PURCHASE. It is safe to purchase any time in the summer. In April or May (of course you purchase only strong colonies) if in the latitude of New York or Chicago—it will be earlier further south—you can afford to pay more, as you will secure the increase both of honey and bees. If you desire to purchase in autumn, that you may gain bythe experience of wintering, either demand that the one of whom you purchase insure the safe wintering of the bees, or else that he reduce the selling price, at least one-third, from his rates the next April. Other- wise the novice would better wait and purchase in the spring. If you are to transfer at once, it is desirable that you buy in spring, as it is vexatious, especially for the novice, to transfer when the hives are crowded with brood and honey. HOW MUCH TO PAY. Of course the market, which will ever be governed by sup- ply and demand, must guide you. But to aid you,I will append what at present would be a reasonable schedule of spring prices almost anywhere in the United States: For box-hives, crowded with black bees—lItalians would rarely be found in such hives—three dollars per colony isa fair price. For black bees in hives such as you desire to use, five dollats would be reasonable. For pure Italians in such hives, seven dollars is not too much. If the person of whom you purchase will take the movable- comb hives after you transfer the bees, you can afford to pay three dollars for black bees, and five dollars for pure Italians. If you purchase in the fall, require 3314 percent discount on these rates. The above is, of course, only suggestive. OR, MANUAL OF THH APIARY. 205 WHERE TO LOCATE. If apiculture is an avocation, then your location will be fixed by your principal business or profession. And herelI may state that, if we may judge from reports which come from nearly every section of the United States, from Maine to Texas, and from Florida to Oregon, you can hardly go amiss anywhere in our goodly land. If you are to engage as a specialist, then you can select first with reference to society and climate, after which it will be well to secure a succession of natural honey-plants (Chap- ter XVII), by virtue of your locality. This suggestion is im- portant, even in California, though it has far less weight than in other sections. If our location is along a river we shall find our honey harvest much prolonged, as the bloom on the upland will be early, while along the river flats it will be later. Who knows how much the many successful bee-keepers along the Mohawk Valley owe to their excellent location? The same holds true of the mouth of the canyons in California. The flowers of both mountain and valley will then contribute of their sweets. Wealso gain in the prolonged honey-flow, as the mountain bloom is much the later. It will also be well to look for reasonable prospects of a good home market, as good home markets are, and must ever be, the most desirable. It will be important, also, that your neighborhood is not over- stocked with bees. Itis a well-established fact, that apiarists with few colonies receive relatively larger profits, especially in rather poor seasons, than those with large apiaries. While this may be owing in part to better care, much doubtless depends upon the fact that there is not an undue proportion of bees to the number of honey-plants, and consequent secretion of nectar. To have the undisputed monopoly of an area reach- ing at least two and one-half miles in every direction from your apiary, is unquestionably a great advantage. If you desire to begin two kinds of business, so that your dangers from possible misfortune may be lessened, then a small farm—especially a fruit-farm—in some locality where fruit-raising is successfully practiced, will be very desirable. You thus add others of the luxuries of life to the products of 206 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE} your business, and at the same time may create additiona! pasturage for your bees by simply attending to your other basiness. In this case, your location becomes a more complex matter, and will demand still greater thought and attention. Some of America’s most successful apiarists are also noted as successful pomologists. A dairy farm, especially where win- ter dairying is carried on, would combine well with bee-keep- ing. Thealsike clover would please alike the cattle and the bees. This is equally true in sections of California and Arizona, etc., only alfalfa takes the place of alsike clover. Bees are often taken *‘on shares.’’ It is usual for one party to furnish the bees, the other to perform all the labor. The expenses are shared equally, as are the proceeds, both of bees and honey. Where one has more colonies of bees than will do well in one place—more than 100 East, more than 250 in California—then ‘‘out-apiaries’’ are often desirable. Such men as Dr. Miller, Messrs. Manum, France, Dadant, Elwood, Mendleson, and Hetherington, find these very profitable. Of course, this is like running a railroad, and success will only mate with brains, gumption and pluck. The out-apiaries should be as convenient as bee-forage, roads and location will permit. If possible, it is wise to locateon some farm, and arrange so the farmer will have an interest that will insure some oversight when the apiarist is away. A fruit-grower may be wise enough to covet the presence of the bees, and so give service to secure it. Of course, convenient hives for moving, and a wagon arranged with suitable rack, are very desirable. Great pains must be taken that the bees are allsecure. Horses stung may mean great loss and harm. Mr. Manum makes assurance doubly sure by covering his horses entirely with cotton blan- kets. One enterprising and energetic enough to found out- apiaries will have the gumption to success, and fully meet every emergency. For position and arrangement of apiary see Chapter VI. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 207 CHAPTER V. HIVES AND SECTIONS. An early choice among the innumerable hives is of course demanded ; and here let me state with emphasis, that none of the standard hives are now covered by patents, so let no one buy rights. Itis in nearly all sections of our country, happily, unnecessary to decry patent hives. Our excellent bee-periodi- cals have driven from among us, forthe most part, that excres- cence—the patent-hive man. His wares were usually worth- less, and his life too often a lie,as his representations wer2 not infrequently false to the letter. As our bee-men so gen- erally read the bee-papers, the patent-hive vendor will grow less and less, and willsoon exist only in the past. It will be a blessed riddance. Success dy the skillful apiarist with almost any hive, is possible. Yet, without question, some hives are far superior to others, and for certain uses, and with certain persons, some hives are far preferable to others, though all may be meritori- ous. Asachange in hives, after one is once engaged in api- culture, involves much time, labor and expense, this becomes an important question, and one worthy of earnest considera- tion by the prospective apiarist. I shall give it a first place, and a thorough consideration, in this discussion of practical apiculture. BOX-HIVES. I feel free to say that no person who reads, thinks and studies—and success in apiculture can be promised to no other —will ever be content to use the old box-hives. In fact, thought and intelligence, which imply an eagerness to investi- gate, are essential elements in the apiarist’s character, and to such a one a box-hive would be valued just in proportion to the amount of kindling-wood it contained. I shall entirely ignore box-hives in the following discussions, for I believe no sensi- ble, intelligent apiarists, such as read books, will tolerate them, and that, supposing they should, it would be an expen- 208 THE BEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE; sive mistake which I have no right to encourage, in fact, am bound to discourage, not only for the benefit of individuals, but also for the art itself. To be sure of success, the apiarist must be able to inspect the whole interior of the hive at his pleasure, must be able to Fic. 82. The Munn Hive, after Munn. exchange combs from one hive to another, and to regulate the movements of the bees—by destroying queen-cells, by giving or withholding drone-comb, by extracting the honey, by intro- ducing queens, and by many other manipulations to be ex- plained, which are only practicable with a movable-comb hive. MOVABLEH-COMB HIVES. There are, at present, two types of the movable-comb hive in use among us, each of which is unquestionably valuable, as each has advocates ainong our most intelligent, successful, and extensive apiarists. Each, too, has been superseded by the other, to the satisfaction of the person making the change. OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 209 The kind most used consists of a box,in which hang the frames which hold the combs. ‘The adjacent frames are so far separated that the combs, which just fill them, shall be the proper distance apart. In the other kind, the ends of the frames are wider than the comb,and when in position are close together, and of themselves form two sides of a box. Whenin use these frames are surrounded bya second box, without a bottom, which, with them, rests on a bottom-board. Each of these kinds is represented by various forms, sizes, Fic. 83. Munn’s Improved Hive, after Munn. etc., where the details are varied to suit the apiarist’s notion. Yet, I believe thatall hives in present use, worthy of recom- mendation, fall within one or the other of the above-named types. EARLY FRAME HIVES. In 1843, Mr. Augustus Munn, of England, invented a mov- able-comb hive (Fig. 82), which I need hardly say was not the Langstroth hive, nora practical one. In 1851 this hive (Fig. 83) 210 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; was improved (?). Well does Neighbour say in his valu- able hand-book, ‘‘ This invention was of no avail to apiarists.”’ M. DeBeauvoys, of France, in 1847, and Schmidt, of Ger- many, in 1851, invented movable-comb hives. The frames were tight-fitting, and, of course, not practical. Dzierzon adopted the bar hive in 1838. In this hive each comb had to be cut loose as it was removed. It isstrangethat Mr. Cheshire speaks of Dzierzon’s hive in connection with the Langstroth. It was a different type of hive entirely. THE LANGSTROTH HIVE. In 1851 our own Langstroth, without any knowledge of what foreign apiarian inventors had done, save what he could findin Huber, and edition 1838 of Bevan, invented the hive (Fig. 84) now in common use among the advanced apiarists of Two-story Langstroth Hive.—From A. I. Root-Co. America. Itis this hive, the greatest apiarian inventivy evet made, that has placed American apiculture in advance or that of all other countries. What practical bee-keeper of America could agree with H. Hamet, edition 1861, p. 166, who, in speak- ing of the DeBeauvoys’ hive, says that the improved hives were without value except to the amateur, and inferior for practical purposes? Our apiarists not native to our shores, like the late Adam Grimm, Mr. C. F. Muth and Mr. Charles Dadant, always conceded that Mr. Langstroth was the inven- OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 211 tor of this hive, and always proclaimed its usefulness. Well did the late Mr. S. Wagner, the honest, fearless, scholarly, truth-loving editor of the early volumes of the American Bee Journal, himself of German origin, say: ‘‘ When Mr. Lang- stroth took up this subject, he well knew what Huber had done, and saw wherein he had failed—failing, possibly, only because he aimed at nothing more than constructing an observatory hive suitable for his purposes. Mr. Langstroth’s object was other and higher. He aimed at making frames movable, inter- changeable, and practically serviceable in bee-culture.’’ And how true what follows: ‘‘ Vobody before Mr. Langstroth ever succeeded in devising a mode of making and using a movable frame that was of any practical value in bee-culture.’? No man in the world, besides Mr. Langstroth, was so conversant with this whole subject as was Mr. Wagner. His extensive library and thorough knowledge made hima competent judge. Mr. Langstroth, though he knew of no previous invention of frames contained in a case, when he made his invention, in 1851, does not profess to have been the first to have invented them. Every page of his book shows his transparent honesty, and his desire to give all due credit to other writers and inven- tors. He does claim, and very justly, to have invented the first practical frame hive, the one described in his patent, applied for in January, 1851, and in all three editions of his book. For this great invention, as well as his able researches in apiculture, as given in his invaluable book, ‘‘ The Honey-Bee,”’ he has conferred a benefit upon our art which can not be over- estimated, and for which we, asapiarists, can not be too grate- ful. It was his book—one of my old teachers, for which I have no word of chiding—that led me to some of the most delightful investigations of my life. It was his invention—the Lang- stroth hive—that enabled me to make those investigations. Fox one, Ishall always revere the name of Langstroth, as a great leader in scientific apiculture, both in America and throughout the world. His name must ever stand beside those of Dzierzon and the elder Huber. Surely this hive, which left the hands of the great master in so perfect a form that even the details remain practically unchanged by many, I think 212 THE BEE-KEEPHR'S GUIDE; most, of our first bee-keepers, should ever bear his name. Thus, though many use square frames like the Gallup, or deep frames, yet all are Langstroth hives. CHARACTER OF THE HIVE. The main feature of the hive should be simplicity, thereby excluding drawers and traps of all kinds. The hive should be made of good pine or whitewood lumber, thoroughly seasoned, Fig1 x | Principle of Warping.—From A. I. Root Co. planed on both sides, and painted white on the outside. In making the Live nail the heart side of the board out, so as to prevent warping. To understand why see Fig. 85. Figure 84 Fic. 86. One-story Langstroth Hive.—From A. I. Root Co. represents a two-story Langstroth hive. As will be seen, this has a portico, and a bottom-board firmly nailed to the hive. Although Mr. Langstroth desired both these features, and many now are like-minded, many others omit both features. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 213 This hive holds eight frames, which are as many as such bee- keepers as Messrs. Heddon, Taylor and Hutchinson desire. Figure 86 represents the Simplicity one-story Langstroth hive as made by A. I. Root. This contains 10 frames, which, unfortunately, were slightly modified so that they are 175 instead of 173% inches long. Thus, this is not the Langstroth Fic. 87. Two-story Langstroth Hive (Gallup Frame.) —Original. a Cover hinged to hive. b Upper story. e Brood-chamber. ad Bottom-board. e Alighting-board. i Wide section-frames, Brood-frames. h, h Frames outside hive. 214 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; frame, but the Simplicity-Langstroth. This style, one-story, is designed for securing comb honey, while the two-story (Fig. 84) is intended for use in obtaining extracted honey. Figure 87 represents a two-story Simplicity-Langstroth hive with Gallup frame; which is 114 inches square. This hive is pre- ferred by G. M. Doolittle. I have used it more than any other, andit has much to recommend it. The Simplicity feature invented by A. I. Root, I think, consists of a bevel union of hive with cover and bottom-board (Fig. 87). I think Mr. Root prefers this style no longer. Any Langstroth hive, with what- Fic. 88. i TU TL jill i i a i a i Ce il i i ae Jones’ Chaff-Hive, Frame. Frame for Sections, Division- Board and Perfor- ated-Zine Division- Board.—From D, A. Jones. ever frame, with these bevel connections is a Simplicity hive. This hive can be used to secure either comb or extracted honey. The bottom-board, d, and the alighting-board, e, may be separate from each other and from the hive; the opening may be made by cutting a V-shaped space in the bottom-board, while the cover, a, mayor may not be hinged to the upper story. Mr. Root, inthe original Simplicity, used the cover as a bottom-board, and formed an entrance by pushing the hive a little toone side. Many prefer to have the cover with a gable (Fig. 88), so madeas to join the hive with a rabbet (Fig. 86 and 88), or to shut over the hive and rest on shoulders formed by OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 215 nailing cleats about the hive near the top. These are heavy andcostly. Imuch prefer a flat cover, and, if necessary to keep out water, we can follow Mr. Doolittle’s plan and sheet with tin or zinc, though I think this unnecessary. Figure 88 represents the Jones chaff hive. This takes a deep frame, and has double walls for chaff packing. ‘These chaff hives are expensive, hard to handle and awkward to man- age. After years of experience I discarded the chaff hives as no better in summer than the single-walled hives, and not so safe in winter as a good cellar. I have disposed of all of mine except three, which I keep for examples. Many, however, prefer such hives, and in some sections, and with some bee- keepers, they may be desirable. WHAT STYLE TO ADOPT. For many yearsI have used the Heddon-Langstroth, and like it so much that I recommend it above all others that I have tried. It is not only the simplest hive I have ever seen, but possesses many substantial advantages that are not possessed by any other hive so farasI know. It can be used with any size frame desired. I have it in use both with Langstroth and Gallup frames. I am free to express my preference for the Langstroth hive, with Langstroth frames. Its excellence warrants me in doing so, and the fact that it is by far the most used of any hive in the country, gives great advantage when one wishes to buy or sell bees. No beginner can make a mis- take in adopting this hive. I will describe the hive for Lang- stroth frame, but would advise any one to get a good hive asa pattern, if he is to adopt them, as much depends upon perfect exactness. The bottom-board and alighting-board (Fig. 87) may be separateif preferred, or not nailed tothe hive. Mr. Heddon nails the bottom-board fast, and lets it project at one end, as seen in the figure (Fig. 89). A hive-stand is made by taking two boards (Fig. 89, /) six inches wide, and nearly as long as the bottom-board. Connect these at one end by a board 4% inches wide, and as long as the hive is wide, nailed firmly at the bottom, and into the ends, and at the other end by a like board nailed the same way. We see (Fig. 94) this end-piece at the 216 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; front of the hive nailed at the bottom so it rests on the ground. At the opposite end a like piece is nailed in the same way, so that all is even on the bottom. Figure 89 explains this better. The bottom of the hive (Fig. 89, 4) is 13x19% inches, outside measure, the sides made of six-eighths inch, bottom and cover of five-eighths, and ends of seven-eighths inch lumber. The height of this piain box is just 10 inches ; that is, it is made of Fie. 89 Heddon-Langstroth Hive.—From James Heddon. ‘ F Bottom-board. A Brood-chamber. C Honey-board. D Case with sections. E Cover. boards 10 inches wide. The side boards are 19% inches long, so that they nail to the ends of the end-boards. If the corners are rabbeted, or, better, dovetailed (Fig. 90), they will be stronger, and less apt to separate with age anduse. When used with the Gallup frame the ends of the hive project, and are nailed into the ends of the side-boards. The end-boards are rabbeted on top. This rabbet is cut three-eighths of an inch deeper than the thickness of the top-bar of the frame. With the Gallup frame (Fig. 96) we rabbet the side-boards. If the top-bar is three-eighths of an inch thick this rabbet should OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 217 be six-eighths precisely. This is very important, as we must have a three-eighths space exactly between the top-bar and the top of the hive. If we make the hive ten and one-eighth (101%) inches high we give a space of half-inch between the bottom of the frame and bottom of hive. I like this wide space, and there is no objection toit. Near the top of the hive we will nail narrow cleats entirely around it; these strengthen the hive, and are convenient supports by which to lift the hive. Hand grooves (Fig. 90) can also be cut in end and side-boards for convenience in handling, if desired. Mr. Root favors these hand-holes always. They are easily cut, and are surely a convenience. The entrance iscut in the end of the hive (Fig. 89), and the size is easily regulated by use of the Langstroth triangular Fie. 90. Dovetailed Hive.—From A, I. Root Co. blocks (Fig. 89, 8, 2). Thus we may gauge the size to our liking. I would have the entrance the whole width of the hive, and seven-eighths of an inch high. This may aid to prevent the bees hanging out of the hive, and likewise may restrain the swarming impulse. The opening in the bottom- board (Fig. 87) is preferred by many. This is enlarged or restricted by simply pushing the hive forward or back, and, of 218 THE BKE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; course, can only be used with loose bottom-boards. The fact that most bee-keepers nail the bottom-board firmly and cut the opening from the hive, argues that this on the whole is the better style. For shipping and moving bees, which, with ‘‘out-apiaries ’’ and change of location to secure better pastur- age, promises to be more and more the practice, the nailed Fic. 91. Queen-Excludiny Honey-Boar@.—From D, A. Jones, bottom-boards are very desirable; for quick cleaning of the hives when spring opens, the movable bottoms are preferable. There should never be but this one opening. Auger-holes above, and openings opposite the entrance, are worse than useless. Except in very damp locations the hive should not rest more than five or six inches from the ground. Tired and neavily laden bees, especially on windy days, may fail to gain the hive, if it is high up, as they return from the field. For extracted honey, we use a second story precisely like the body of the hive, exceptit is a half-inch lessin depth; that is, the sides are 914 instead of 10 inches wide. Mr. Dadant prefers half-story hives for the extracting frames, but he uses the large Quinby frame (Fig. 95). If we wish we can follow Da- dant, and use two or more of these upper stories, and tier up, in OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 219 which case we would not need to extract until the close of the harvest, when the honey would be ripened in the hive. Upon the body of the hive rests the slatted honey-board (Fig. 91). It is seen in place (Figs. 89 and 93), This is also 13 by 19% inches. The outer rim of this valuable invention and the slats are in one plane on the under surface, and the slats are three-eighths of an inch apart, leaving passages that width for the bees to pass through. On the upper surface the rim projects three-eighths of an inch above the slats, so that if a board be laid on the honey-board its lower surface will be three-eighths of an inch above the slats. When the honey- board is placed on the hive, the spaces between the slats must rest exactly over the center of the top-bars of the brood-frames below. In using hives with the Gallup or American frames the slats of course will run crosswise of the honey-board, and as before must break joints with the top-bars of the frames. Fic, 92. STAT TT ——— 1 ee Plain Division-Board. Perforated-Zine Division-Board. From D, A. Jones. The use of this prevents the bees from building brace-combs above the brood-frames, and keeps the sections very neat. No one after using this will do without it, lamsure. By tacking a piece of perforated-zinc (Fig. 92) on the under side of this honey-board it also becomes a queen-excluder. The grooves in the zinc must be very exact. They are .165 of an inch wide. It is cheaper, and so better, simply to place a narrow strip of the perforated-zinc between the slats of the honey-board (Fig. 220 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; 91). By grooving the edges of the slats it is easy to insert the zinc strips when making the honey-board. ‘The honey-board may be wholly of zinc with a wooden rim. The objection to this is the fact that the zinc is likely to sag and bend. Mr. Heddon suggests that a V-shaped piece of tin be soldered across the middle to strengthen the zinc and prevent sagging. The tin should be so placed as not to touch the frames below, but come between them. Mr. Heddon also suggests that the wooden rim be replaced by a narrow margin of the zinc itself, bent at right angles to the plane of the metal. THE HEDDON SURPLUS-CASE. As this admirable case is also a part of this hive, I will ‘describe it right here, though it properly belongs to the sub- ject of case for surplus honey. This caseis just as long and broad as the hive, and three-eighths of an inch deeper than the height of the section to be used. (See Fig. 89, D.) Thus, on the hive described it will be 13 by 19% inches, and if we use common 1-pound sections, which are 41% inches square, it will be 45% inches deep. Partitions are fastened in by use of screws or nails just far enough apart to receive the sections; thus, in the 1-pound sections, 44 inches apart. These parti- tions are as wide as the crate or case is deep. Narrow strips of tin are nailed to the bottom of these partitions and to the bottom of the ends of the case, projecting enough to sustain the sections when they are placed in the case. It will be seen that when in place the sections reach to within three-eighths of an inch of the top of the case. This must be just three-eighths of an inch. It keeps the sections all clean, but will not if not Just this bee-space. THE COVER. ‘ The cover of the hive (Fig. 89, Z) is a plain board, a little wider and longer than the hive. The ends of this are fitted into a grooved cross-piece about twice as thickas the board, and firmly nailed. These cross-pieces prevent the top from warping and splitting. If preferred, the cover need be no longer or wider than the hive. In thiscase cross-pieces should be firmly nailed on the upperside to prevent warping or split- ting. It will be seen that we have here no telescoping, and no OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 221 beveling—simply one board rests upon another. At first I was much prejudiced against this simple arrangement. After giving it a thorough trial I wish nothing else. The only criti- cism I have for this hive after several years’ experience is, that if the board coveris used in spring, the protection is in- sufficient. We break the propolis or glue in examining the bees, and then as the bees can not glue all close at this early season, the brood is apt to chill, and the bees to suffer, espe- cially if the sides of the hives have shrunken, or the cover warped. By use of a quilt or warm woolen cloth just the size of the hive placed above, and a crate filled with dry sawdust above this, allis made snug and comfortable, and even this objection disappears. To adopt this style of hive is not ex- pensive. Wecan use the same frames as before, and can make all new hives of this simple, plain pattern, and in time we will have only these hives. To shade the hive nothing is so good as a shade-board made considerably wider than the hive, and nailed to two cleats five inches wide. Thus, when resting on the hive this shade-board will be five inches above the top of the hive. This has never blown off of my hives. Should it do so a brick could easily be fastened to the under side, out of sight, and thus make it entirely safe against winds. Thus I have described the Heddon-Langstroth hive minutely, as with W. Z. Hutchinson, R. lL. Taylor, and many others of our most able and intelligent apiarists, I find it, upon trial, as excellent as it is simple. Surely, when we can har- ness excellence and simplicity together we have a most desir- able team. The simple union of parts by mere plain contact of the edges, or the cover simply lying on the hive, while it is just as acceptable to the bees, makes the hive far more simple of construction, and easy of manipulation. The honey-board and bee-spaces keep all so neat, that as one bee-keeper well says, their extra expense is very soon savedin the saving of time which their use insures. Auy who may think of trying this hive better do as I did, try two or three at first, and see if in their judgment the ‘‘ game is worth the candle.” All hives should be well painted with white paint. This color makes the heat less trying to the combs and bees. While 222 THI BIKE-KEEPER'S GUIDE; it may not be profitable to paint, yet when neatness and dura- bility are both considered, surely painting pays well. For paint I would use white lead, zinc and oil—avout one-third as much zinc as lead. Mr. Doolittle, whose opinion justly ranks very high among American bee-keepers, thinks that white paint makes shade unnecessary. DIVISION-BOARD. A close-fitting division-board (Fig. 92) is very important, and no Langstroth hive is complete without it. Mr. Heddon, in his excellent book, follows the English, and calls this a dummy. Itis especially useful in autumn, winter and spring in contracting the hive, and thus economizing heat, and at the harvest seasons in contracting the brood-chamber, so as to secure the honey in the sections whereit is desired. It is made the same formas the frames, but is alittle larger so that it is close-fitting in the hive. It iseasily made by nailing a top-bar of the usual frame on top of a board that will just fit in the hive, and reach to the top of the rabbet. If desired the board may be beveled at the edges. When the division-board is inserted in the hive it separates the brood-chamber into two parts by a close partition. Many bee-keepers make them like a close-fitting frame and cover with cloth, which is stuffed with chaff. Others groove the edges and insert a strip of cloth orrubber. Thechaff board is for greater warmth, the rubber to make the Loard fit closely, and yet give enough to make it easy to withdraw the division-board when it swells from dampness. Mr. Jones prefers that the division-board should not reach quite to the bottom of the hive (Fig. 88). This en- ables the bees to pass under, and as heat rises there is very little objection to this bee-space under the division-board. We use the division-board to contract the chamber in winter, to vary tt so as to keep all combs covered with bees in spring, to contract the brood-chamber when we wish to securea full force of bees in the sections, to convert our hives into nucleus hives for queen-rearing, and in case we secure comb honey in two-story hives, which, however, we do not practice now, to contract the upper chamber when the season first opens. OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. mes CLOTH COVERS. After the season is over, and the weather becomes cold, about the 20th of September, it is well to remove the honey- board, and to cover above the bees with a piece of heavy factory cloth, which thus forms the immediate cover for the bees in winter. The section-case full of dry, fine sawdust has now this cloth for its bottom, while the cover of the hive rests on the section-case. It will be noted that I have made no mention in the above of metal rabbets, or, more correctly, metal supports. I have tried these for some years, and have usually recommended them, but for the past several yearsI have omitted them, and think I shall have no further use for them in my hives. If we wish them we have only to cut the rabbeta little deeper and tack inside the hive, just below the rabbet, a narrow strip of heavy tin, which shall projecta little above the wooden rabbet, just enough to raise the top of the frame to within three- eighths of an inch of the top of the hive. Theadvantages of these are that they make a very narrow rest or support for the frames, and so the latter are more easily loosened, and in care- less hands are less apt to kill bees when put into the hives. It is always easy, however, by meansof a chisel to loosen frames, and if we are often manipulating our bees, as when extracting in summer, the frames are easily loosened without the metal supports. Some apiarists make hives without rabbets, making the frames to rest on the topof the hive. I have tried such hives thoroughly, and wish no more of them. Of course, with such hives the valuable honey-board and bee-spaces are im- possible. THE NEW HEDDON HIVE. Mr. Heddon has patented and offered to the public a new hive which combines in principle the Langstroth and the Huber. Ihave tried this hive only for a short time, and so, guided by the rule I have always adopted, I do not recommend it. Yet the experienced bee-keeper can often judge correctly of what he has never tried, and I will add that I fully believe this hive and the method Mr. Heddon gives of manipulation in his valuable book, are well worth our attention. Mr. Heddon 224 THE BEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE; isso able that he rarely recommends what is not valuable. Several others have tried this hive, and speak in the highest terms of its value. Among these are no less authorities than R. L. Taylor and W. Z. Hutchinson. At the beginning of this chapter I caution all against patent hives. This is necessary, as so many frauds have been committed under this guise; but if Mr. Heddon has given us something as valuable as it is unique and original, he well deserves a patent, which should be thoroughly respected, as should all worthy inventive effort. From my brief experience I fear the hive is too complicated for the average bee-keeper. With a much longer experience (1900) Ican not recommend it. It works admirably if every- thing is perfectly exact; otherwise it isa vexation. Absolute exactness is rare in our day and world. I shall describe the hive only in brief, advising all who wish to investigate this newcomer, to procure Mr. Heddon’s work, ‘‘ Success in Bee-Culture,’’ as this will bean excellent investment aside from the matter of the hive. This hive (Fig. 93) has close-fitting frames fastened ina case by use of wooden thumb-screws. The efhd-bars of the frames are wide like those of the Huber hives, and rest on tin supports. The top and bottom bars of the hives are only as wide as the natural comb, seven-eighths of an inch. The frames are only five and three-eighths (534) inches deep, and this with the wide spaces between them makes it possible to do much without removing the frames. There is a three-eighths inch space above the frames, and a honey-board as in the Heddon-Langstroth hive. Thus, one or two shallow hives can be used, and to con- tract the brood-chamber at any time we have only to remove one of them. Figure 93 shows the hive, which, with two brood-chambers, gives about the capacity of a 10-frame Lang- stroth hive. As all frames are securely held by the screws, any brood-chamber can be reversed, or any two can change places at the pleasure of the bee-keeper. I have found the screws to swell and work with extreme difficulty. I think Mr. Taylor excludes the screws, and wedgesthe frames instead. As the combs will all be firmly attached on all sides to the frames, there is no space for hiding, and the queen can gen- OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 225 erally be found without removing the frames. I haveseen Mr. Taylor find several queens with these hives in a few minutes time. Fic. 93, The New Heddon Hive.— From James Heddon. a Stand. D E Section-cases. #H Thumb-screw. BC Two sections. «Wf Slatted honey-board. F Cover. 226 THE BEE-KEHPER’S GUIDE; The bottom-board (Fig, 94) has a raised rim. Thus the frames are one-half inch from the bottom. Of course, the bottom-board is loose. Mr. Heddon recommends single-story wide-frames with separators for the sections. These are alsc secured by the screws, and so any frame or the whole case can be reversed at will. Of course, the old Heddon case without separators could be used, but could not be reversed. The points of excellence claimed for this hive,and I know from my experience that they are real, are easy contraction of brood-chamber, quick inversion of the brood-chamber or section-case, ease and quick- Fic. 94. Heddon Bottom-Board.—From James Heddon. ness of manipulation, and the interchangeableness of the brood-chambers forming the hive,and the power we have by quick and easy contraction of the brood-chamber to get all light-colored honey in the sections if we so desire. Mr. J. M. Shuck has also patenteda hive for which he claims the same advantages gained in the new Heddon hive. I have not worked with it enough to recommend it. I fear the hives are too complex for the general bee-keeper. The fact, too, that perfection of work and measurements despite our best care are very rare, urges against this hive, as it must be very accurate or itis a sore vexation. I advise all to go slowin adopting them, as we know the old, tried ones are excellent. | OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 227 fear that in the hands of the general bee-keepers these new hives will not prove satisfactory. THE FRAMES. The form and size of frames, though not quite as various as the persons whouse them, are still very different (Fig. 95). Some prefer large frames. I first tried the Quinby frame, and afterward the Langstroth (Fig. 95). The advantage claimed Fic. 95. 12 183¢ or nw = AMEBICAN. QUINBY. x ny 175% x GALLUP. Lanestrorg. * RK * 139% 19% ADAIR. jt OLOSED BND QUINBY. [2 Brood- Frames.—From A. I. Root Co. for large frames is that there are less to handle, and time is saved; yet may not smaller frames be handled so much more dextrously, especially if they are to be handled through all the long day, as to compensate, in partat least, for the number? The advantage of the shallow frame is, as claimed, that the bees will gointo boxes more readily; yet they are not consid- ered by some bee-keepers as safe for out-door wintering. This is the style recommended and used by Mr. Langstroth, which fact may account for its popularity in the United States. 228 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; Another frame in common use, is one about one foot square. I have long used one 114% inches square, and still think that this frame has much to commend it. It is light, easily handled, convenient for nucleus hives, and perhaps the best form for forming a compact winter cluster; and yet upon mature re- flection I have decided to use in future, as already stated, the Langstroth frame, and advise all others to do so. It is very desirable to have beesin hives suchas others will wish in case we sell bees, as every bee-keeper is almost Fic. 96, Gallup Frame.—vriyinal. a Top-bar. ec Comb-guide. b, b Side-bars or uprights. d@ Bottom-bar. sure to do more or less each year. The Langstroth hive is used much more generally than any other, and thatit is excellent is shown in the fact that most of our successful bee-keepers, from Canada to the Gulf, use it, andI am free tosay that, taking the whole country through, it is doubtfulif a better style or form exists than the regular Langstroth. The chief objection urged against its use, that it is not the best form to secure safe wintering, lacks force in view of the fact that many who have been most successful use this frame. Indeed, with thorough protection this frame is as good as any, and most bee-keepers are learning that in our Northern States pro- tection is absolutely essential to success. That we shall ever have a uniform frame used by all api- arists, though exceedingly desirable, is too much to be hoped. Ido not think there is sufficient advantage in any form to war- rant us in holding to it, if by yielding we could secure this uniformity. Nor doI think the form and size so material as OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 229 to make it generally desirable for the apiarist tochange all his hives, to secure a different style of frame. To make a Langstroth frame I would use a top-bar (Fig. 96)—the figure illustrates a Gallup frame which is square, and will serve to make this explanation clearer, eighteen and seven- eighths (187%) inches long, seven-eighths (7%) of an inch wide, and one-fourth (14) of an inch thick. The end-bars (Fig. 96, 6, 6) should be eight and five-eighths (854) inches long, and as wide and thick as the top-bar. The top-bar is fastened to the end-bars, as shown in the figure, by nailing through it into Fic. 97, Reversible Frame, Upper one hung in the Hive, Lower one partly reversed. —From James Heddon, the ends of the end-bars, so as to leave the top-bar projecting three-fourths (34) of an inch. The bottom-bar is seventeen and three-eighths (173%) inches long, and as wide and thick as the other parts—though it may be only one-half as thick if pre- ferred. It is also nailed to the ends of the end-bars, so that it is as long as the frame. The parts when made at the factory are often dovetailed so as to be more securely united. For some years I have used the reversible frame (Fig. 97), which has valuable features which would warrant its use were 230 THE BRE-KHEPER’S GUIDE; it not for its complexity. With this frame there is no danger of the top-bar sagging, which is sure to enlarge the bee-space above and create mischief, and by inverting we secure the firm attachment of the comb to the frame along all its edges, and it helps to force our bees into the sections, simply by inverting the combs. This may not always Succeed with the unskillful—some bee-keepers report failure—and it re- quires some time and attention. Figure 97 shows the charac- ter of the reversible frame as made by Mr. Heddon, and which T have found to work the best of any that I have used. As will be seen, the reversible part is a rectangle, pivoted in the center to the bottom of the short end-bars. These short end- bars at the top come within one-fourth ('{) inch of the side of the hive, and thin a little as they run down, so that the lower end is three-eighths (3g) of an inch from the side of the hive. The botiom of the frame, indeed all below the short end-bar, is three-tourths (3;) of an inch from the side of the hive. This makes it easy to put in the frames without crushing the bees. It might be supposed that the bees would build combs between the lower end of the frame and the hive, but I have never seen a case of the kind, andI have used such frames now quite extensively for several years. These frames reverse very easily, and I do not know a single person who has thoroughly tried them, whe does not value them highly. Here again let me suggest that in making changes, a few be tried first, and not all till we know we wish them. As the use of comb foundation secures straight combs, with no drone-cells, it is very desirable. When this is fastened by merely pressing or sticking it to the top-bar, it is apt to say and warp, hence it is becoming quite the custom to wire the frames (Fig.97). This insures perfect safety if we wish to ship our bees, and secures against sagging or bulging of the foundation. If the foundation is put on with the Given press as the foundation is made, No. 36 wire is used; if pressed on by hand No. 30 wire is better. The timber for frame should be thoroughly seasoned, and of the best pine or white wood. Care should be taken that the frame be made so as to hang vertically, when suspended on OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 231 the rabbets of the hive. To secure this very important point— true frames that will always hang true—they should always be made around a guide. A BLOCK FOR MAKING FRAMES. This may be made as follows: Take a rectangular board (Fig. 98) eleven and one-eighth by thirteen and a quarter inches. On both ends of one face of this, nail hard-wood pieces (Fig. 98, ¢, ¢) one inch square and ten and three-fourths inches long, so that one end (Fig. 98, g, g) shall lack three- eighths inch of reaching the edge of the board. On the other face of the board, nail a strip (Fig. 98, c) four inches wide and eleven and three-eighths inches long, at right angles to it, and in such position that the ends shall just reach to the edges of Fic. 98. Block for making Gallup Frames,—Original. the board. Midway between the one-inch-square pieces, screw on another hard-wood strip (Fig. 98, d@) one inch square and four inches long, parallel with and three-fourths of an inch from the edge. To the bottom of this, screw a semi-oval piece of hoop-steel (Fig. 98, 5, 6), which shall bend around and press against the square strips. The ends of this should not reach quite to the bottom of the board. Near the ends of this spring fasten, by rivets, a leather strap an inch wide (Fig. 98, a), 232 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE}; which shall be straight when thus riveted. ‘These dimensions are for frames eleven and one-fourth inches square, outside measure, and must be varied for other sizes. Instead of the iron and strap, some use two pieces of wood with a central pivot. The upper ends of these levers are united by a strong elastic cord, so that the lower ends are constantly pressed against the side-pieces of the block. Recently we have used in such blocks, both for frame and section-making, a single hard-wood strip, a little shorter than the distance between the stripseande. Thisis pivoted at the center to the center of the block. This isa very simple way to hold the side-pieces firmly against the strips ce, ¢. We have only to turn this lever. To use this block, we crowd the end-bars of our frames between the steel springs (Fig. 98, 6, 6) and the square strips (Fig. 98, ¢, e); then lay on our top-barand nail, after which we invert the block and nail the bottom-bar, as we did the top-bar. Now press down on the strap (Fig. 98, a), which will loosen the frame, when it may be removed all complete and true. Such a gauge not only insures perfect frames, but demands that every piece shall be cut with great accuracy, and some such arrangement should always be used in making the frames. The above description and Fig. 98 are for Gallup frames. For Langstroth frames the hard-wood strips would be eight and five-eighths (85g) inches long, and the distance between them would be sixteen and seven-eighths (16%) inches, that is, if the frames are made of pieces one-fourth of an inch thick. ‘To make reversible frames we use two such guides. Wire nails are very excellent for making frames, and just the thing for the pivots in reversible frames. When the frames are in the hive there should be at leasta one-fourth or three-eighths inch space between the end of the frame and side of the hive. As before stated, the space below the frame may be one-half inch. A much wider space on the sides than that given above is likely to be filled with comb, and so prove vexatious. The wide space below gives no such trouble,and in winter it is desirable, as also in case the hive shrinks. It is very undesirable to have the frames reach to the bottom of the hive. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 233 ‘The distance between the frames may be one-half of an inch, or best one and three-eighths inches from center to cen- ter of the frames. This is better than one and one-half, as the brood is kept warmer, and worker-brood is more likely to be reared. A slight variation either way does noharm. Some men, of very precise habits, prefer nails or wire staples in the side and bottom of the frames. Mr. Cheshire calls these his suggestions, though Mr. Langstroth used them over twenty years ago, which, if I am correctly informed, was before Mr. Cheshire kept bees at all. These are to insure equal spacing of the frames. Mr. Jones prolongs the sides and bottom of the frame (Fig. 88) for the same purpose. These projections extend just a quarter of aninch, so as to maintain this un- varying distance. Some bee-keepers use frames with wide, close-fitting end-bars, or with top-bars wide and close-fitting Fic. 99. Hoffman Frames.—From A, L. Root Co. at theends. Mr. Root now favors the Hoffman frame (Fig. 99), as he calls it, which has the top-bar and upper ends of the end-bars wide and close-fitting. He claims more rapid hand- ling, as the frames, he says, can be handled in groups. I have tried all these styles, and do not like them. It is easy for any bee-keeper to try them. ‘‘ Prove all things; hold fast that which is good,”’ or that which pleases you. COVER FOR FRAMES. As before stated, a board covers the hive all through the honey season. This rests upon the upper story of the hive, or upon the upper section-case. From September to June, in the 234 THE BEE-KEEPER'S GUIDE; cold Northern climate, a piece of thick factory cloth should rest on the frames as before stated. This is just the size of the hive, and when properly adjusted no beecan pass above it. By cutting on three sides of an inch square, we form a flap in this cloth which may be turned back to permit the bees to enter the feeder, when feeding isdesired. In fall, winterand spring, a section-case left on the hive and filled with fine sawdust or chaff is a most desirable substitute for a heavy, awkward chaff hive. Dr. Miller covers the year through with a cloth cover. THE HUBER HIVE. The other type of hives originated when Huber hinged several of his leaf or unicomb hives together so that the frames would open like the leaves of a book. In August, 1779, Huber wrote to Bonnet as follows: ‘I took several small fir-boxes, a foot square and fifteen lines wide, and joined them togther by hinges, so that they could be opened and shut like the leaves of a book. When using a hive of this description, we took care to fix a comb in each frame, and then introduced all the bees,’”’ (Edinburgh edition of Huber, p. 4.) Although Morlot and others attempted to improve the hive, it never gained favor with practical apiarists. In 1866, Mr. T. F. Bingham, then of New York, improved upon the Huber hive, securing a patent on his triangular-frame hive. This, sofaras Ican judge, was the Huber hive made practical. Mr. Bingham now uses a modification of this hive (Fig. 101). In 1868, Mr. M. S. Snow, then of New York, now of Minne- sota, procured a patent on his hive, which was essentially the same asthe hives now known as the Quinby and Bingham hives. Soon after, the late Mr. Quinby brought forth his hive, which is essentially the same as the above, only differing in details. No patent was obtained by Mr. Quinby, whose great heart and boundless generosity endeared him to all acquaint- ances. Those who knew him best never tire of praising the unselfish acts and life of this noble man. If we except Mr. Langstroth, no other man, especially in the early days, did so much to promote the interest and growth of improved apicul- OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 235 ture in the United States. His hive, his book, his views of win- tering, and foul brood, his introduction of the bellows-smoker— a gift to apiarists—all speak his praise asa man andan api- arist. The facts that the Bingham hive, as now made, is a great favorite with those that have used it, that Mr. Quinby pre- ferred this style or type of hive, that the Quinby form is used by the Hetherington brothers—Capt. J. E., the prince of Ameri- can apiarists, with his thousands of colonies, and O. J., whose neatness, precision, and mechanical skill are enougp to awaken envy—are surely sufficient to excite curiosity and be- speak a description. The Quinby hive (Fig. 100) as used by the Hetherington brothers, consists of a series of rectangular frames (Fig. 100) Fic. 100. Frame, Bottom-Board and Frame-Support, of Quinby Hive.—Original. twelve by seventeen inches, outside measure. The end-bars of these frames are one and one-half inches wide, and half an inch thick. The top and bottom one inch wide and half an inch thick. The outer halves of the end-bar project one-fourth of an inch beyond the top and bottom bars. This projectiou is lined on the inside with sheet-iron, which is inserted in a groove which runs one inch into each end of the end-pieces, and is tacked by the same nails that fasten the end-bars to the top and bottom bars. This iron at the end of the bar bends in at right-angles (Fig. 100, a), and extends one-fourth of an inch parallel with the top and bottom bars. Thus, when these 236 THE BEE-KKEPER’S GUIDE} frames stand side by side, the ends are close, while half-inch openings extend between the top and bottom bars of adjacent frames. The bottom-bars, too, are one-fourth of an inch from the bottom-board. ‘Tacked to the bottom-board, in line with the position of the back end-bars of the frames, is an inch strip of sheet-iron (Fig. 100, 6, 5) sixteen inches in length. One-third of this strip, from the front edge back, is bent over so it lies not quite in contact with the second third, while the posterior third receives the tacks which hold it to the bottom- board. Now, when in use, this iron flange receives the hooks on the corners of the frames, so that the frames are held firmly, and can be moved only back and sidewise. In looking at the bees we can separate the combs at once, at any place. The chamber can be enlarged or diminished simply by adding or withdrawing frames. As the hooks are on all four corners of the frames, the frames can be either end back, or either side up. This arrangement, which permits the inversion of the frames, is greatly praised by those who have triedit. It was claimed by the Hetheringtons years ago that by turning these ‘frames bottom up the comb would be fastened above and below, and the bees, in their haste to carry the honey from the bottom of the frames, would rush at once into the sections. Boards with iron hooks close the side of the brood cavity, while a cloth covers the frames. The entrance (Fig. 100, ¢)is cut in the bottom-board, as already explained, except that the lateral edges are kept parallel. A strip of sheet-iron (Fig. 100, d)is tacked across this, on which rest the ends of the front end-bars of the frames which stand above, and underneath which pass the bees as they come to and go fromthe hive. A box, without bottom and with movable top, covers all, leaving a space from four to six inches above and on all sides between it and the frames. This gives chance to pack with chaff in winter, and for side and top storing in sections in summer. The Bingham hive (Fig. 101) is not only remarkably sim- ple, but is as remarkable for its shallow depth, the frames being only five inches high. These have no bottom-bar. The end-bars are one and a half inches wide, and the top-bar square. The nails that hold the end-bars pass into the end of OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 237 the top-bar, which is usually placed diagonally, so that an edge, not a face, is below; though some are made with a face below (Fig. 101, *), to be used when comb is transferred. The frames are held together by two wires, one at eachend. Each wire (Fig. 101, a) is a little longer than twice the width of the hive when the maximum number of frames are used. The ends of each wire are united and placed about nails (Fig. 101, 6,6) in the ends of the boards (Fig. 101 ¢c,c) which form the sides of the brood-chamber. A small stick (Fig. 101, a) spreads Fic. 101. Frames and Bottom-Board of the Bingham Hive.—From A. I. Root Co. these wires, and brings the frames close together. A box without bottom and with movable cover, is placed about the frames. Thisis large and high enough to permit of chaff packing in winter and spring. The bottom-board may be made like the one already described. Mr. Bingham does not bevel the bottom-board, but places lath under three sides of the brood-chamber, the lath being nailed to the bottom-board. He uses the Langstroth blocks to contract the entrance (Fig. 101, g). The advantages of this hive are simplicity, great space above for surplus frames or boxes, capability of being placed one hive above another to any height desired, while the frames may be reversed, end for end, or bottom for top, or the whole brood-chamber turned upside down. Thus, by doubling, we may have a depth of ten inches for winter. It will be seen at oncc that this hive possesses all the advantages claimed for the new Heddon and Shuck hives, except the frames are not held so securely. Yetit is far more simple, which is greatly in its favor. 238 THE BEE-KEEPHR’S GUIDE; The objections which I have found in the use of such hives are the fact that so few use them, and danger of killing bees. in rapid handling. They can be manipulated with rapidity if we care not how many bees we crush. It hurts meto killa bee, and sol find the Langstroth style more quickly manipu- lated. Mr. Snow, too, who was the first to make the above style of hive, has discarded it in favor of the Langstroth. His objection to the above, is the fact that the various combs are not sure to be so built as tobe interchangeable. Yet that such apiarists as those above named prefer these Huber hives, after long use of the other style, is certainly not without significance. OBSERVATORY HIVE. To study bees while they are at work, requires a hive so constructed that we can look in upon all the bees of the hive Fic. 102. Observatory Hive.—Original. at pleasure. For this purpose I have used a small Langstroth hive (Fig. 102) containing one frame. Glass is used each side of the frame, and this is shaded by doors hung on hinges. We are able to look at the bees or make all dark inside at pleasure. To prevent the hive from becoming’too crowded, we must every twenty-three or twenty-four days shake the bees from the OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 239 frame, and replace the latter with another frame, which shall contain no brood. From sucha hive, in my study window, I have received much pleasure and information. APPARATUS FOR PROCURING COMB HONEY. Although I feel sure that extracted honey will grow more and more in favor, yet it will never supersede the beautiful comb, which, from its exquisite flavor and attractive appear- ance, has always been, and always will be, admired and desired. So, nohive is complete without its arrangement of section frames and cases, all constructed with the view of securing this delectable comb honey in the form that will be most tempting to the eye and palate. SURPLUS COMB HONEY IN SECTIONS. Honey in several-pound boxes is no longer marketable, and is now almost wholly replaced by comb honey in sections. In fact, there is no apparatus for securing comb honey that promises so well as these sections. That they are just the thing to enable us to tickle the market is shown by their rapid growth in popular favor. Some years ago I predicted, at one of our State conventions, that they would soon replace boxes, and was laughed at. Nearly all who then laughed, new use these sections. They are cheap, and with their use we can get more honey, and in a form that will make it irresistible. The wood should be white, the size small—two-pound sec- tions are as large as the market wlll tolerate. One-pound sections are more salable, andin some markets even one-half pound sections are best of all. Of late, Mr. W. Harmer, of Manistee, Mich., is making and using successfully a two- ounce section. Thisis very neat and cheap. It is made of a shaving, andis glued. Such sections would be the thing to sell at fairs. The size of the sections has nothing to do with the amount of honey secured, and so the market and extra cost should guide the apiarist in this matter. As early as 1877 I used veneer sections, which were essen- tially the same as the one-piece sections now so popular. After this I used nailed sections. At present only the very neatest sections can catch the market, and so we must buy our 240 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; sections of those who can make them by machinery neater and cheaper than we possibly can by hand. Dr. C. C. Miller, James Heddon, and many others, prefer sections made as are children’s toy blocks—the sides fastened by a sort of mortise and tenon arrangement (Fig. 103). These are preferred, as they do not have the shoulder of the one- Fic. 103. Dovetailed Section.—From A. I. Root Co. piece section. They are objected to from the longer time re- quired to put the pieces together, and their lack of rigidity when together, so that they are likely to get out of shape. The Wheeler section—invented and patented by Mr. Geo. T. Wheeler, of Mexico, N. Y., in 1870—isremarkable for being Fic. 104, a a One-Pound Section.—From A. I. Root Co. Fic. 105. Prize Section.—From A. I. Root Co. the first to be used with tinseparators. Instead of making the bottoms narrower for a passage, Mr. Wheeler made an open- ing in the bottom. Another style of section, termed the one-piece section (Fig. 104), is, as its name implies, made of a single piece of wood, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 241 f with three cross cuts so that it can be easily bent into a square. The fourth angle unites by notches and projections, as before described. These one-piece sections are now, I think, the favorites among bee-keepers. I prefer these to the dovetailed. They are quickly and safely bent, if dampened slightly before bending, and are firm when in shape foruse. Dr. Miller wets these quickly by pouring hot water at the to be corners while they are yet in the package. They must be even in the pack. If, as argued by Messrs. Dadant, Foster and Tinker, the sec- tions opeu on all sides are superior, then we must perforce use these one-piece sections, rather than the dovetailed. This last desirable feature is best secured in the plain. section (Fig. 106), so-called in distinction from the bee-space Fic. 106. Plain Sections in Super, Showing Frame-Holders and Fence. —From A, I, Root Co. er bee-way sections just described. These are like the ends of the one-piece section.all around (Fig. 106); that is, the bottom and top are not cut out to form bee-spaces. These plain sec- tions give free communication, and thus are more readily filled, and as the honey projects to the very edge they look neater (Fig. 108). Of course, there _is less wood than in the bee-space sections, and all edges are even. They are more easily and quickly scraped to remove propolis, etc. They are 242 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; rapidly growing in favor. These are used with ‘‘fences,”’ to be described, and in the ordinary supers (Fig. 106). Heretofore there have been two prevailing sizes of sec- tions in use in the United States—the prize section (Fig. 105), which is five and one-fourth by six and one-fourth inches, and the one-pound section (Fig. 104), which is four and one-fourth inches square. The latter is coming rapidly to the front, as Fic. 107. af, Jf, 4 Plain Sections in Super, Showing Fence.—From A. I. Root Co. honey in it sells more readily than if in a larger section. Even half-pound sections have taken the lead in the Boston and Chicago markets. It is barely possible that these small sections will rule generally in the markets of the future. They would often sell more readily, and are far better to ship, as the combs will seldom if ever break from the sections. If, in arranging our sections, we desire to have them oblong, we would better make them so that they will be longestup and down. Mr. D. A. Jones finds that if so made they are filled and capped much sooner (Fig. 108). Captain J. EK. Hetherington prefers the oblong section, being one which is three and seven-eighths by five inches. Mr. Danzenbaker uses one which is four by five inches. He thinks honey in such sections (Fig. 108) sells for a higher price. In the depth of the section, which fixes the thickness of the comb, a change from the common style seems to be desirable. Heretofore they have been generally made two inches deep. With such sections we must use separators to secure perfect combs. Dr. Miller uses separators, and pre- fers a depth of one and five-sevenths, or two inches. By reducing the depth to from one and three-eighths to one and OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 243 three-fourths inches, the expense of separators is found by some to be unnecessary. In feeding back to have sections completed, or where each section is removed as soon as capped, separators are indispensable. While I have never succeeded satisfactorily without separators—as the sections of comb would not be regular enough to ship well—yet I prefer the depth of my sections to be one and five-sevenths inches, or seven to the foot. These hold about three-fourths of a pound. I now believe that the best section for to-day is one four and one-quarter inches square and one and five-sevenths inches in Fic. 108. A ek ae Oblong and Square Sections.—From A. I, Root Co. depth. We secure nicer comb for the table, with the thinner combs, and more bees are able to work on a super or frame of sections, so that the foundation is more speedily drawn out. While a little more honey might be secured in two-pound sec- tions, the market would, I think, make their use undesirable. Of course, any decided change in the form and size of our sec- tions involves no small expense, as it requires that the supers 244 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; or frames for holding the sections should also he changed. Often, however, by a little planning we can vary the form so as to reduce the size, without necessitating this expense. HOW TO PLACK SECTIONS IN POSITION. There are two methods, each of which is excellent, and has, as it well may, earnest advocates—one by use of frames, the other by supers. SECTIONS IN FRAMES. Frames for holding sections (Fig. 109) are made the same size as the frames in the brood-chamber. The depth of the Fic. 109. Gallup Section-Frame.—Original. frame, however, is the same as the depth of the sections. The bottom-bar is three-eighths of an inch narrower than the remainder of the frame, so that when two frames are side by side, there is three-eighths of an inch space between the bot- tom-bars, though the top and side pieces are close together. In case sections are used that are open on all sides, then the ends of the section-frames must also be narrow. I should fear such an arrangement would be objectionable from the amount of propolis that would be used by the bees to make all secure. OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 245 The sections are of such a size (Fig. 110) that four, six or nine, etc., will just fill one of the large frames. Nailed to one side of each large frame are two tin, or thin wooden, strips (Fig. 110, ¢, ¢) in case separators are to be used, as long as the frame, and as wide into one inch as are the sections. These are tacked half aninch fromthe top and the bottom of the Fic. 110. u il! il vill Gallup Frame with Sections,—Original. large frames, and so are opposite the sections, thus permitting the bees to pass readily from one tier of sections to another, as do the narrower top and bottom bars of the sections, from those below to those above. Captain Hetherington tells me that Mr. Quinby used these many years ago. It is more trouble to make these frames if we have the tins set in soas just to come flush with the edge of the end-bars of the frames, but then the frames would hang close together, and would not be so stuck together with propolis. These may be hung in the second story of a two-story hive, and just enough to fill the same—my hives will take nine—or they can be put below, beside the brood-combs. Mr. Doolittle, in case he hangs these below, inserts a perforated division-board, so that the queen will not enter the sections and lay eggs. ’ 246 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; The perforated-zinc division-board (Fig. 92) would serve admirably for this purpose. A honey-board (Fig. 91) of the same material keeps sections, either in supers or frames, that are above the hive, neat, and also keeps the queen from enter- ing them. The workers enter just as freely. In long hives, the ‘* New Idea’’—which, though I would not use, nor advise any one else to use, I have found quite sat- isfactory, after several years’ trial, especially for extracted honey—I have used these frames of sections, and with good success. The Italians enter them at once, and fill them even more quickly than other bees fill the sections in the upper story. In fact, one great advantage of these sections in the frames is the obvious and ample passageways, inviting the Fic. 111. Langstroth Frame with One-Pound Sections.—From A, I, Root Co. bees toenter them. But in our desire to make ample and invit- ing openings, caution is required that wedo not overdo the matter, and invite the queen to injurious intrusion. So we have Charybdis and Scylla, and must, by study, learn so to steer between as to avoid both dangers. Mr. Jones finds that by using the division-board made of perforated-zinc (Fig 92), the queenis kept from the sections, and they can be safely placed in one end of the body of the hive. Figure 111 shows a Langstroth frame full of one-pound sections. As already stated, Mr. Heddon recommends the use of one-story wide-frames, with separators, and so made as to admit of inversion (Fig. 93). At first I used these deep frames exclusively. The great objection to them is the daubing with propolis, and difficulty of removing the sections from the wide OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 247 frames. This has led me to replace the wide frames by the more convenient and desirable section-case or crate. CRATES OR RACKS. These (Fig. 112) are to be usedin lieu of large frames, to hold sections, and are very convenient, as we can use one tier Fic. 112. mT) @ ‘ B| h | NUT G H Fs: Crate for Sections.—Original. at first, and asthe harvest advances tier up, or ‘ storify,” as our British friends would say, until we may use three, or even Fic. 113. L Super.—From A. I. Root Co. four, tiers of sections ona single hive. I think this far the best arrangement for securing comb honey. Southard and Ranney, of Kalamazoo, have long used a very neat rack, as seen in Fig. 112. 248 THE BEEH-KERPHR’S GUIDE; It will be seen that the Heddon case (Fig. 93), already described (page 225) asa part of the Heddon-Langstroth hive, is only a modification of the Southard crate. This crate does not permit the use of separators, The case or super preferred and used by Dr. C. C. Miller (Fig. 113) is one with 1 shaped tin supports, on which rest the sections. This is just like the Heddon case, except the parti- tions are omitted. Projecting tin strips are tacked on the bot- tom of the sides as wellas ends. These strips on the ends help hold the end rows of sections, while those on the sides hold the 4 shaped tins, which in turn support the sections. As the vertical part of the | supports the separator, it should not be more than one-half inch high. As most of us use—must use—separators, this is probably one of the best section-honey Fic. 114. Hilton T Super.—From A. I. Root Co. cases for us, and so one of the best arrangements for securing comb honey. Mr. Hilton (Fig. 114), of Michigan, does not like the movable 1 supports, and so he omits the projecting tin pieces, and tacks the 4 tins at the ends to the bottom of the side of the case. Mr. Heddon has a case (Fig. 93) which permits inversion, through the use of wide frames and thumb-screws. Still another method to support sections (Fig. 115) has many advo- cates. The case is like the one used with the _ tins, but has projecting tin supports tacked to the ends only. On these rest OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 249 plain frames with no top-bar (Fig. 115), which in turn support the sections. If bee-space sections are used, then the bottom- bar of these frame-supports must have bee-ways or spaces cut Fic. 115. Dovetailed Super with Frames and Section-holders.—From A. I. Root Co. D Wooden Separator. £ Sections with Foundation Starters. in them. ‘These are also used to hold the plain sections (Fig. 106), in which case, as the fence (Fig. 116) always used with these sections furnishes a bee-way, the frames, like the sec- tions, are entirely plain. Of course, separators can be used with these supports, in case we use the bee-space sections. Fic. 116, Fence for Plain Sections,—From A. I. Root Co. FENCES. The fenceis simply a slatted separator made by nailing three boards (Fig. 116) three-sixteenths of an inch apart to end posts, which project three-eighths of an inch below the lowest 250 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; board; cross-pieces of the same thickness as the corner posts, three-sixteenths of an inch, are like the corner posts nailed on each side connecting the boards of the fence. They do not reach below the lowest board. Thus, these fences permit very free communication (Figs. 106, 107). The whole distance at the bottom of the sections has a wide bee-way which also reaches part way up the ends. Of course, the cross-pieces are exactly opposite the ends of the sections which they separate. As these separators have spaces, they give ample connection between sections, and favor rapid comb-building and honey- storing. Fences are also placed outside the last row of sec- tions. They secure added warmth by the double wall of bees, and so better filled sections. No wonder that these plain sec- tions and fences are rapidly coming into use. Their use, of course, necessitates the use of cases with frames having no top-bars to hold the sections and fences (Fig. 106). If we discard separators the old Heddon case is excellent; if we must use separators then the case with | shaped tin supports is perhaps the best in the market. Theplain sections are so admirable that they will be largely used; then the frame supports must be used. In any casea follower (Fig. 115, D) should be used to crowd the sections with separators close together. This may be pushed by use of a thumb-screw (Fig. 114), wedge, or steel spring. Mr. Adam Grimm once wrote that boxes above the hive should not be closely covered. As already stated, Mr. Heddon puts no close cover over his sections. Mr. Hasty is pleased with simply a cloth, cheap muslin, above his sections, anda board cover to protect from rains. Such ventilation of the sections is scientific as well as practical. All apiarists who desire to work for comb honey that will sell, will certainly use the sections, and adjust them by use of either frames or cases. Each method has its friends, though I think cases or supers are justly taking the lead. SEPARATORS. These may be of woodor tin. While the tin were first used, and do work well, the wood seem to be growing in favor, and seem likely wholly to replace the tin. The wood are poorer OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 251 conductors of heat, and also give a foothold for the bees, both of which are desirable qualities. FOOT-POWER SAW. Every apiarist, who keeps only a few bees, will find, if he makes his own hives. a foot-power saw very valuable. I have used, with great satisfaction, the admirably combined foot- power saw of W. F. & John BarnesCo. It permits rapid work, Fic. 117. NT Ti Weieaig iy Ysgrme h Horse-Power.—From A, I. Root Co. ANNA insures uniformity, and enables the apiarist to give a finish to his work that would rival that of the cabinet-maker. Those who procure such a machine should learn to file and set the saw,and should mever run the machine when not in perfect order. When just beginning the business it will generally be wise to secure a fully equipped hive of some bee-keeper or dealer in supplies. If thereis a hive factory near at hand, it may pay to buy all hives ready made ; otherwise high freights may make this unprofitable, If a person wishes to manufacture 252 THE BEE-KEEPHR’S GUIDE; hives by the score, either for himself or others, even the foot- power saw will soon become too slow and wearying. In this case some use wind-power, which is too uncertain to give full satisfaction ; others use horse-power, and still others procure a small steam-engine. Mr. M. H. Hunt, a very thoughtful apiarist, uses a very con- venient horse-power (Fig. 117). The large wheel is fifteen feet in diameter, the horse is inside the rim, and the band consists Fic. 118. Saw-Table.—From A, I, Root Co. of a chain, that it may not slip. To get the horse in position, the wheel is simply lowered. I have used a tread-power which pleases me much. It is safe, can be used under shelter, and if one has colts or young horses it serves well to quiet them. As gasoline engines are now so cheap, and convenient; and as crude oil for steam en- gines is so cheap, such engines will generally be preferred when one’s business is at all extensive. In case we use other than foot or hand power, our saw-table must be firm and heavy. The one illustrated here (Fig. 118) is recommended by Mr. A. I. Root. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 253 CHAPTER VI. POSITION AND ARRANGEMENT OF APIARY. As it is desirable to have our apiary grounds so fixed as to give the best results, and as this costs some money and more labor, it should be done once for all. As plan and execution in this direction must needs precede even the purchase of bees, this subject deserves an early consideration. Hence, we will proceed to consider position, arrangement of grounds, and preparation for each individual colony. POSITION, Of course, it is of the first importance that the apiary be nearathand. In city or village this is imperative. In the country, or at suburban homes, we have more choice, but close proximity to the house is of much importance. In a city it may be necessary to follow Mr. Muth’s example, and locate on the house-tops, where, despite the inconvenience, we may achieve success. The lay of the ground is not important, though, if a hill, it should not be very steep. It may slope in any direction, but better any way than toward the north. Of course, each hive should stand perfectly level. ARRANGEMENT OF GROUNDS. Unless sandy, these should be well drained. If a grove offers inviting shade, accept it, but trim high to avoid damp. Such a grove could soon be formed of basswood and tulip trees, which, as we shall see, are very desirable, as their bloom offers plenteous and most delicious honey. Even Virgil urged shade of palm and olive, also that we screen the bees from winds. Wind-screens are very desirable, especially on the windward side. Such ascreen may be formed of a tall board fence, which, if it surrounds the grounds, will also serve to protect against thieves. Yet theseare gloomy and forbidding, 254 THH BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; and will be eschewed by the apiarist who has an eye to esthetics. Evergreen screens, either of Norway spruce, Austrian or other pine, or arbor vite, each or all are not only very effective, but are quickly grown, inexpensive, and add greatly to the beauty of the grounds. In California eucalyp- tus is very desirable shade. The species grow vigorously, stand drouth, and if wisely selected afford much honey. Such a fence or hedge is also very desirable if the bees are neara street or highway. It not only shuts the bees away, as it were, but it so directs their flight upward that they will not trouble passers-by. If the apiary is large, a small, neat, inex- pensive house in the center of the apiary grounds is indispen- sable. ‘This will serve in winter as a shop for making hives, frames, etc., and as a store-house for honey, while in summer it will be used for extracting, transferring, storing, bottling, etc. In building this, it will be well to construct a frost-proof, thoroughly drained, dark and well-ventilated cellar. (See Chapters XVIII and XIX.) PREPARATION FOR KACH COLONY. Virgil was right in recommending shade for each colony. Bees are forced to cluster outside the hive, if the bees are sub- jected to the full force of the sun’s rays. By the intense heat the temperature inside becomes like that of an oven, and the wonder is that they do not desert entirely. I have known hives, thus unprotected, to be covered with bees, idling outside, when, by simply shading the hives, all would go merrily to work. The combs, too, and foundation especially, are liable, in unshaded hives, to melt and fall down, which is very dam- aging to the bees, and very vexatious to the apiarist. The remedy for all this is always to have the hives so situated that they will be entirely shaded all through the heat of the day. This might be done, as in the olden time, by constructing a shed or house, but these are expensive and very inconvenient, and, therefore, to be discarded. If the aiarist has a convenient grove this may be trimmed high, so as not to be damp, and will fulfill every requirement. So arrange the hives that while they are shaded through all the heat of the day, they will receive the sun’s rays early ard OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY, 255 late, and thus the bees will work more hours. I always face my hives to the east. Sucha grove is also very agreeable to the apiarist who often must work all the day in the hottest Fic. 119. Nucleus and Simplicity Hive Shaded by Grape-vine.—From A. I. Root Co. sunshine. If no grove is at command, the hives may be placed on the north of a Concord grape-vine (Fig. 119), or other vig- orous variety, as the apiarist may prefer. This should be 256 THE BEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE; trained toa trellis, which may be made by setting two posts, either of cedar or oak. Let these extend four or five feet above the ground, and be three or four feet apart. Two or three supporting arms of narrow boards can be nailed at right angles to a single post on which to train the vines, or we may connect them at intervals of eighteen inches with three gal- vanized wires, the last one being at thetop of the posts. Thus we can have shade and grapes, and can see for ourselves that bees do not injure grapes. These should be at least six feet apart. A. I. Root’s idea of having the vine of each succeeding row divide the spaces of the previous row, in quincunx order (Fig. 120), is very good ; though I should prefer the rows in this case to be four instead of three feet apart. I have tried grape- vines and evergreens to shade hives, and do not like them. They are too much in the way. UnlessI can have a grove trimmed high up I much prefer a simple shade-board as already suggested. ‘This is simply a wide board nailed to the edge of two cross-boards, which are about fourinches wide. I make these eighteen inches wide by two feet long. I have some even larger. If one cross-board is a little narrower it givesa slant that insures a rapid removalof the waterin arain. I have never known these shade-boards to blow off. Should they do so a second board parallel to the shade-board could be nailed to the cross-boards. A brick placed on this would make all secure. This shade-board is inexpensive, always out of the way, and ready for service. Many apiarists economize by using fruit-trees for shade, which, from their spreading tops, serve well, though often from their low branches they are not pleasant to work under. Mr. Doolittle thinks if hives are painted white shade is unneces- sary. Mr. A. I. Root’s idea of having sawdust under and about the hives has much to recommend it. The objection to sawdust is the danger from fire. I have used sawdust, cement, asphalt, etc. I think on the whole a tine grass lawn kept closely and smoothly mown is as convenient as any plan, and it certainly has taste and beauty to recommend it. If closely mown, one will rarely lose a queen. While ashes or sawdust make a queen walking upon them more conspicuous, I much prefer the beautiful grass plat. OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 257 Ma = rex | | ‘i ih Oi IPT Ty | Fie. 120. Grape-Vine Apiary.—From A. I. Root Co. 258 THE BRE-KEHPER'S GUIDE; CHAPTER VIL TO TRANSFER BEES. As the prospective bee-keeper may have purchased his bees in box-hives, barrels, or hollow logs, and so, of course, will desire to transfer them immediately into movable-frame hives, or, as already suggested, may wish to transfer from one movable-frame to another, I will now proceed to describe the process. Among the many valuable methods which Mr. Heddon has given to the bee-keeping public, not the least valuable is that of transferring. This method should be used only at or just before the swarming season—the best time to transfer. After blow- ing a little smoke into the hive, sufficient to alarm the bees, we set it a little aside, and put in its place the new hive full of wired foundation. We now turn the old hive, whatever it may be, bottom side up, and place a box over it. If the bees are sufficiently smoked, it will make no difference even if the box is not close-fitting to the old hive. Yet the beginner will feel safer to have it so; and in this case no stinging can take place. We then witha stick or hammer rap onthe hive for from ten to twenty minutes. The bees will fill with honey and go with the queen into the upper box and cluster. If towards the last we carefully set the box off once or twice, and vigorously shake the hive, and then replace the box, we will hasten the emigration of the bees, and make it more complete. I got this last suggestion from Mr. Baldridge. A few young bees will still remain in the old hive, but these will do no harm. We next take the box, which contains the queen and nearly all the bees, and shake the bees all out in front of the hive already placed on the old stand. The bees willat once take possession, draw out, or better, build out, the foundation ina surprisingly short time, and will give us a set of combs which will surpass in beauty those’ procured in any other way. Should the bees be unable to gather any honey for some days, OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 259 which at this season is not likely to occur, of course we must feed them. We set the old hive aside for twenty-one days, when the young bees will all come from the cells. Should the weather be cold, it might be wellto put thisin a warm room, so the brood will not chill. At the time of swarming this will rarely be necessary. We now drum out these bees as before, kill the queen, which has been reared, and unite the bees with the others, or form a separate colony as before, as the number of bees determines. We can now split out the corners of the old hive, split the gum, or separate the staves of the barrel, so as not to break the comb. This should be carefully cut loose, and the honey extracted by use of the wire comb-holder (Fig. 150), and the comb melted into wax for foundation. The only loss in this method is the time which the bees require to build out the foundation, and this is far more than made up in the superior combs which are secured. I think the time expended in melting up the combs, etc., is more than made up by the time saved in transferring. THE OLD METHOD. If one has no foundation, or desires to give the bees the comb'and honey at once, even at. the cost of less shapely combs, he then should drum the bees out as before, on a warm day when they are busy at work, and put the box containing the bees on the old stand, leaving the edge raised so that the bees which are out may enter, and so all the bees can get air. This method is difficult, except in early spring, and is best done about noon, when the bees are busy on the fruit-bloom. It is not safe to transfer on a hot day, when the bees are idle, as the risks from robbing are too great. If other bees do not trouble, as they usually will not if busily gathering, we can proceed in the open air. If theydo, we must go into some room. I have frequently transferred the comb in my kitchen, and often in a barn. Now knock the old hive apart, as already described, cut the combs from the sides, and get the combsout of the old hive with just as little breakage as possible. Mr. Baldridge, if transferring in spring, saws the combs and cross-sticks 2600 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; loose from the sides, turns the hive into the natural position, then strikes against the top of the hive with a hammer till the fastenings are broken loose, when he lifts the hive, and the combs are all free and in convenient shape for rapid work. We now need a barrel, set on end, on which we placea board fifteen to twenty inches square, covered with several thicknesses of cloth. Some apiarists think the cioth useless, but it serves, I think, to prevent injury to comb, brood or honey. We now place a comb on this cloth, and seta frame on the comb, and cut out a piece of the combthe size of the inside of the frame, taking pains to save all the worker-brood. Now crowd the frame over the comb, so that the latter will be in the same position that it was when in the oid hive ; that is, so the honey will be above—the position is not very important —then fasten the comb in the frame, by winding about all one or two small wires, or pieces of wrapping-twine. To raise the frame and comb before fastening, raise the board beneath till Fic. 121. Fic, 122. Transferring-Clasp.— From American Bee Journal, Transferred Comb.—From American Bee Journal. the frame is vertical. Set this frame in the new hive, and proceed with the others in the same way till we have all the worker-comb—that with small cells—fastened in. To secure the pieces, which we shall find abundant at the end, take thin pieces of wood, one-half inch wide, and a trifle longer than the frame is deep, place these in pairs either side the comb, extending up and down, and enough to hold the pieces secure till the bees shall fasten them (Fig. 121), and secure the strips by winding with small wire, just below the frame (Fig. 122), or by use of small rubber bands, or else tack them to the frame OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 261 with small tacks. Some bee-keepers use U-shaped pieces of wire or tin to hold the comb in the frame. Captain Hetherington has invented and practices a very neat method of fastening comb into frames. In constructing his frames, he bores small holes through the top, side and bottom bars of his frames, about two inches apart ; these holes are just large enough to permit the passage of the long spines of the hawthorn. Now, in transferring comb, he has but to stick these thorns through into the comb to hold it securely. He can also use all the pieces, and still make a neat and secure frame of comb. He finds this arrangement convenient, too, in strengthening insecure combs. In answer to my inquiry, this gentleman said it paid well to bore such holesin all his frames, which are eleven by sixteen inches, inside measure. I discarded such frames because of the liability of the comb to fall ont. Having fastened all the nice worker-comb into the frames —of course, all other comb will be melted into wax—we place all the frames containing brood together in the center of our new hive, especially if the colony is weak, or the weather cool, and confine the space by use of the division-board, adding the other frames as the bees may need them. We now place the new hive on the stand, opening the entrance wide, so that the bees can enter anywhere along the alighting-board. We then shake all the bees from the box, and any young bees that may have clustered on any part of the old hive, or on the floor or ground, where we transferred the comb, immediately in front of the hive. They will enter at once and soon be at work, all the busier for having passed ‘“‘from the old house into the new.”’ Intwo or three days remove the wires, or strings or sticks, when we shall find the combs all fastened and smoothed off, and the bees as busily engaged as though their present home had always been the seat of their labors. In practicing this method, many proceed at once to trans- fer without drumming out the bees. Inthis case the bees should be well smoked, should be driven, by the use of the smoker, away from the side of the old hive where the combs are being cut loose, and may be brushed direct from the old combs into the new hive. This method will only be preferred 262 a THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; by the experienced. The beginner will find it more easy and pleasant first to drum out all the bees before he commences to cut out the combs. i Of course, in transferring from one frame to another, the matter is much simplified. In this case, after thoroughly smoking the bees, we have but to lift the frames and shake or brush the bees into the new hive. Fora brush, a chicken or turkey wing, a large wing or tail feather from a turkey, goose or peacock, or atwig of pine or bunch of asparagus twigs serves admirably. Cheap and excellent brushes (Fig. 154) are now for sale by all supply-dealers. Now cut out the comb in the best form to accommodate the new frames, and fasten as already suggested. After the combs are all transferred, shake all remaining bees in front of the new hive, which has already been placed on the stand previously occupied by the old hive. Sometimes bees from trees in the forest are transferred to hives and the apiary. HUNTING BEE-TREES. Except for recreation, this is seldom profitable. It is slow and uncertain work. The tree, when found, is not our own, and though the owner may consent to our cutting it, he may dislike to do so. The bees, when found, are difficult to get alive; itis even more difficult to get the honey in good condition, and, when secured, the honey and bees are often almost worthless. The principle upon which bees are “‘lined’’ is this: That after filling with honey, a bee always takes a direct course— ‘*a bee-line ’’—to its hive. To hunt the bee-trees we needa bottle of sweetened water, a little honey-comb, unless the bees are gathering freely from forest flowers, and a small bottom- less box with a sliding glass cover, and a small shelf attached to the middle of one side on the inside of the box. A shallow tray, or piece of honey-comb, is to be fastened to this shelf. If the bees are not found on flowers, we can attract them by burning a piece of honey-comb. If on a flower, set the box over them after turning a little of the sweetened water in the comb or tray on the shelf. It is easy to get them to sipping this sweet. Then slide the glass, and, when they fly, watch OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 263 closely and see the direction they take. By following this line we come to the bee-tree, or more likely to some neighbor’s apiary. By getting two lines, if the bees are from the same tree, the tree will be where the lines meet. We should be care- ful not to be led to neighboring apiaries, and should look very closely when the bees fly, to be sureof the line. Experience makes a person quite skillful. It need hardly be said that in warm days in winter, when there is snow on the ground, we may often find bee-trees by noting dead bees on the snow, as also the spotting of the snow, as the bees void their feces. When a tree is found, we must use all possible ingenuity to get the combs whole if we wish to transfer the bees. We may cut in and remove the comb; may cut out the section of tree containing the bees and lower this by use of a rope; or we may fellthe tree. In this last case we may make the destruc- tion less complete if we fall the tree on other smaller trees to lessen the jar. ; 264 THE BEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE; CHAPTER VIII FEEDING AND FEEDERS. As already stated, it is only when the worker-bees are storing that the queen deposits to the full extent of her capa- bility, and that brood-rearing is at its height. In fact, when storing ceases, general indolence characterizes the hive. This is peculiarly true of the German and Italian races of bees. Hence, if we would achieve the best success, we must keep the workers active, even before gathering commences, as also in the interims of honey-secretion by the flowers; and to do this we must feed sparingly before the advent of bloom in the spring, and whenever the workersare forced to idleness during any part of the season, by the absence of honey-producing flowers. For a number of years I have tried experiments in this direction by feeding a portion of my colonies early in the season, and in the intervals of honey-gathering, and always with marked results in favor of the practice. Ofcourse it is not well to feed unless we expect a honey harvest the same season. Thus, I would not feed after clover or basswood bloom unless I expected a fall harvest. The fact that honey seasons are uncertain, makes the policy of feeding merely to stimulate questionable. Mr. D. A. Jones has truly said that if feeeding in the autumn be deferred too long, till the queen ceases laying, it often takes much time to get her to resume, and not infre- quently we fail entirely. Every apiarist, whether novice or veteran, will often receive ample reward by practicing stimulative feeding early in the season; then his hive at the dawn of the white clover era will be redundant with bees, well filled with brood, and in just the trim to receive a bountiful harvest of this most delicious nectar. Feeding is often necessary to secure sufficient stores for OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 265 winter—for no apiarist, worthy of the name, will suffer his faithful, willing subjects to starve, when so little care and expense will prevent it. This is peculiarly true in Southern California, where severe drouths often prevent any harvest, and these may occur on two successive years. If we only wish to stimulate, the amount fed need not be great. A half pounda day, or even less, will be all that is necessary to encourage the bees to active preparation for the good time coming. For information in regard to supplying stores for winter, see Chapter XVIII. Bees, when very active, especially in very warm weather, like most higher animals, need water. ‘This very likely is to permit evaporation in respiration, and the necessary cooling of the body. At such times bees repair to pool, stream or watering-trough. As with other animals, the addition of salt makes the water more appetizing, and doubtless more valuable. Unless water is near, it always ought to be furnished to bees. Any vessel containing chipsor small pieces of boards to secure against drowning will serve for giving water. In case bees trouble about watering-troughs, a little carbolic acid or kero- sene-oil on the edge of the trough will often send them away. WHAT TO FEED. For this purpose I would feed granulated sugar, reduced to the consistency of honey, or else extracted honey kept over from the previous year. If we use two-thirds syrup and one- third good honey we save all danger of crystallization or granulation. We add the honey when the syrup is hot, and stir. The price of the honey will decide which is the more profitable. The careful experiments of R. lL. Taylor show that nearly three times as much honey as syrup will be con- sumed. This argues strongly for the syrup. Dark, inferior honey often serves well for stimulative feeding, and as it is not salable, may well be used in this way. To make the syrup, I use one quart of water to two of sugar, and heat till the sugar is dissolved. Mr. R. l. Taylor first boils the water, hen stirs in the sugar till all boils, when ke says it will not granulate even with no acid added. This also removes all danger of burning the syrup, which must never be done. By 266 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; stirring till allthe sugar is dissolved we may make the syrup without any heat. We use equal parts of sugar and water, and may easily stir by using the honey extractor. We putin the water and add the sugar as we turn the machine. A little tartaric acid—an even teaspoonful to fifteen pounds of syrup— or evena little extracted honey, will also prevent crystalliza- tion. If fed warm in early spring it is all the better. Many advise feedin the poorer grades of sugar in spring. My own experience makes me question the policy of ever using such feed for bees. The feeding of glucose or grape sugar is even worse policy. It is bad food for the bees, and its use is dangerous to the bee-keeper’s reputation, and injurious to our brother bee-keepers. Glucose is so coupled with fraud and adulteration that he who would ‘‘avoid the appearance of evil’’ must let it severely alone. In all feeding, unless extracted honey is what we are using, we can not exercise too great care that such feed is not carried to the surplus boxes. Only let our customers once taste sugar in their comb honey, and not only is our own repu- tation gone, but the whole fraternity is injured. In case we wish to have our combs in the sections filled or capped, we must feed extracted honey, which may often be done with gredt advantage. I have often fed extracted honey back to the bees, after the honey-flow ceased, when it would be quickly stored in the sections. More frequently, however, I have utterly failed of success. HOW TO FEED. The requisites of a good feeder are: Cheapness, a form to admit quick feeding, to permit no loss of heat, and so arranged that we can feed at all seasons without in any way disturbing the bees. The feeder (Fig. 123), which Ihave used with good satisfaction, isa modified division-board, the top-bar of which (Fig. 123, 6) is two inches wide. From the upper central por- tion, beneath the top-bar, a rectangular piece the size of an oyster-can is replaced with an oyster-can (Fig. 123, g), after the top of the latter has been removed. A vertical piece of wood (Fig. 123, d)is fitted into the can so asto separate a space about one inch square, on one side, from the balance of OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY, 267 the chamber. This piece does not reach quite to the bottom of the can, there being a one-eighth inch space beneath. In the top-bar there is an opening (Fig. 123, ¢) just above the smaller space below. In the larger space is a wooden float (Fig. 123, /) full of holes. On one side opposite the larger chamber of the can, a half-inch piece of the top (Fig. 123, e) is cut off, so that the bees can pass between the can and top-bar on to the float, where they can sip the feed. The feed is turned into the hole in the top-bar (Fig. 123, 2), and without touching a bee, passes down under the vertical strip (Fig. 123, d) and raises the float (Fig. 123, 7). The can may be tacked to Fic. 123. Division- Board Feeder.—Original. Lower part of the face of the can removed, to show float, ete. —Original. the board at the ends near the top. Two or three tacks through the can into the vertical piece (Fig. 123, d) will hold the latter firmly in place; or the top-bar may press on the vertical piece so that it can not move. Crowding a narrow piece of woolen cloth between the can and board, and nailing a similar strip around the beveled edge of the division-board, makes all snug. ‘The objection to this feeder is that it can not be placed just above the cluster of bees. On very cold days in spring the bees can not reach their food in any other position. The feeder is placed at the end of the brood-chamber, and the 268 THE BEK-KKEPER’S GUIDE; top-bar covered by the quilt. To feed, we have only to fold the quilt over, when with a tea-pot we pour the feed into the hole in the top-bar. Ifa honey-board is used, there must bea hole in this just above the hole in the division-board feeder. In either case no bees can escape, the heat is confined, and our division-board feeder is but little more expensive than a division-board alone. Some apiarists prefer a quart can set on a block (Fig. 124), or it may be used with a finely perforated cover. This is Fic. 124. , Fruit-Jar Ieeder.—From A. I, Root Co. filled with liquid, the cover put on, andthe whole quickly inverted and set above a hole in the cover just above the bees. Owing to the pressure of the air, the liquid will not descend so rapidly that the bees can not sipit up. ‘The objections to this feeder are, that it is awkward, raises the cushions so as to per- mit the escape of heat, and must be removed to receive the feed. Mr. A. I. Root recommends the little butter-trays sold at the groceries, for feeding. These cost only one-third of a cent. ‘‘Need no float, and work admirably.’’ I have tried these, and think they have only their cheapness to recom- mend them. They raise the cover, can not be filled without disturbing the bees, leak, and daub the bees. Even paper sacks of good quality, with small holes in them, have been used. They are laidon the frames, and cost very little. As feeders last fora lifetime, I prefer to pay more and get good ones. OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 269 The Simplicity feeder (Fig. 125), invented by A. I. Root, is shown on its side in the illustration. This is used at the entrance, and sois not good for cold weather. As the feed is Fic. 125. Simplicity Bee-Feeder.—From A. I. Root Co. exposed it can only be used at night, when the bees are not flying. Itis never, I think, desirable to feed outside the hive. The Shuck feeder (Fig. 126) is a modification of the Sim- plicity, anda great improvement. This is used at the en- trance of the hive, or by nailing two together, so that the sides marked D will face each other, we can use it above the bees. We then would place the opening D above a hole in the cloth Fic. 126, Shuck’s Boss Bee-Feeder.—From American Bee Journal. cover, or honey-board, turn the feed in at C,and the bees would come up at D, pass under the cover, and down into the saw-cuts (Fig. 126, 4, A), when they would sip the feed, and then crawl up on the partitions. This feeder works admirably. but it is patented, costs too much, and is improved in the 270 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; SMITH FEEDER. This feeder (Fig. 127) is larger than the Shuck—I make them eight by twelve inches—and is covered all over with wire gauze (Fig. 127, a), which is raised by the wooden rim so that the bees can pass readily over the partitions (Fig. 127). The central saw-cuts (Fig. 127) do not reach the end of the feeder, sothereisa platform left (Fig. 127, 6) through which a hole (Fig. 127, c) is made. This rests above a hole in the cloth Fic. 127, Smith Bee-Feeder.—Origina?. below, and is the door through which the bees reach the feed. When in position just above the bees it may be covered by a shingle or piece of pasteboard, to prevent daubing the cloth or cushion, and all by the chaff cushion. To feed, we have only to raise the cushion and the pasteboard, and turn the food through the gauze. No bees can get out, there is no disturb- ance, no danger from the robbers, and we can feed at any time, and can feed very rapidly if desired. I like this feeder the best of any I have ever tried. I make them outof two-inch Plane , e Heddon feeder (Fig. 128) is much the same in princi- ple as the Smith, and has all the advantages. It is the size of a section-crate, and soholds many pounds. The figure makes it plain. The spaces in this are not saw-cuts, but are formed by thin boards nailed in a box vertically, anda space on one or both sides (Fig. 128) does not connect with the food reser- voir, but serves as a passage-way for the bees from hive to OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 271 feeder. In the center is a passage (Fig. 128, c) which connects with the food reservoir, but is not accessible to the bees. In this the food is poured when feeding, which makes it unneces- sary to have the wire gauze above, or tosmear the top when feeding, asin case of the Smith feeder, yet this feeder does not retain the heat in spring. ‘The center of the cover slides back, so the whole cover need not be removed when feeding is done. The vertical partitions, except the one next to the space (Fig. 128) where the foodis added, do not run quite to the board which covers the feeder, and so the bees can pass into Fic. 128. Heddon Bee-Feeder.—From James Heddon. all the spaces except where we pour in the food. No partition except the one next to the space where the bees pass to and from the hive runs quite to the bottom, so the food will pass readily from one space to the other, and will always be equally nigh in all. . Mr. D. A. Jones and many others having tight bottom- ooards to their hives use no feeder, but turn the feed right into the hive. Dr. C.C. Miller, like L. C. Root, prefers to feed by filling frames of empty comb with the syrup or honey. The empty combs are laid flat, in a deep box or tub, under a colander or finely perforated pan. The syrup, as it falls, fills the cellsof comb. After the comb is filled on both sides, we have only to hang it in the hive. I have found that by use of a fine spray-nozzle and force-pum'p we can fill frames very fast. ‘The best time to feed is just at nightfall. In this case the 272 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; feed will be carried away before the next day, and the danger to weak colonies from robbing is avoided. In feeding during the cold days of April, all should be close above the bees to economize heat. In all feeding, care is requisite that we may not spillthe feed about the apiary, as this may, and very generally will, induce robbing. If, through neglect, the bees are found to be destitute of stores in mid-winter, it is not best to feed liquid food, but solid food, like the Viallon candy or the Good mixture of honey and sugar, which will be described under the head of shipping queens. Cakes of either of these should be placed on the frames above the cluster of bees. Mr. Root has had excellent success in feeding cakes of hard candy made as follows: Granulated sugar is put in a pan and a very little water added. Thisis heated by placing on a stove, but never in direct contact with the fire. In the lattercase it may be burned, as shown by the taste, odor, or from the fact that it kills the bees. If the pan is placed on the stove, the contents will never be burned. It must be boiled untilif dropped ona saucer in cold water, or if the finger is wet in cold water, then dipped in the hot sugar, and again in water, the hard sugar is brittle. It must be boiled until the hardened product is brittle, or else it will be too soft and will drip. It can now be stirred untilit begins to thicken and then molded in dishes, or in the regular comb frames. In this last case we lay the frame close on a board covered with thin paper, and turn the thickening sugar intoit. By adding one-fourth rye-meal we havea good substitute for pollen, which may be used in case of a scarcity of the latter. Of course, frames of this hard candy may be hung right in the hive. Inacellar or on warm days outside frames of honey may be given to the bees. OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 273 CHAPTER IX, QUEEN-REARING. Suppose the queen is laying two thousand eggs a day, and that the full number of bees is forty thousand, or even more— though as the bees are liable to so many accidents, and as the queen does not always lay to her full capacity, it is quite probable that this is about an average number—it will be seen that each day that a colony is without a queen there is a loss equal to about one-twentieth of the working force of the colony, and this a compound loss, as the aggregate loss of any day is its special loss augmented by the several losses of the previous days. Now, as queens are liable to die or to become impotent, and as the work of increasing colonies demands the absence of queens, unless the apiarist has extra ones at his command, it is imperative, would we secure the best results, ever to have at hand extra queens. Queen-rearing for the marketis often very remunerative, and often may well engage the apiarist’s exclusive attention. So the young apiarist must learn early HOW TO REAR QUEENS. As queens may be needed early in the spring, preparations looking to the rearing of queens must commence early. As soon as the bees are able to fly regularly, we must see that they have a supply of bee-bread. If there isnot a supply from the past season, and the locality of the bee-keeper does not furnish an early supply, then place unbolted flour (that of rye or oats is best) in shallow troughs near the hives. It may be well to give the whole apiary the benefit of such feeding before the flowers yield pollen. If the bees are not attracted to this we need not add honey, etc., to induce them totakeit. This isa sure sign thatitis not needed. I found that in Central Michigan bees can usually gather pollen by the first week of April, which, I think, is as early as they should be allowed to fly, and, in fact, as early as they will fly with sufficient 274 THE BER-KEEPER’S GUIDE; regularity to make it pay to feed the meal. I much question, after some years of experiment, if it is ever necessary at this place to give the bees a substitute for pollen. In case of long storms, the bee-bread may be exhausted. I have never known such a case, when the hard candy frames with rye meal described at the close of the last chapter may be hung in the hive. The best colony in the apiary—or if there are several colo- nies of equal merit, one of these—should be stimulated to the utmost, by daily feeding with warm syrup, and by increase of brood taken from other colonies. As this colony becomes strong, a comb containing drone-cells should be placed in the center of the brood-nest. Very soon drone-eggs will be laid. I have often had drones flying early in May. As soon as the drones commence to appear, remove the queen and all eggs and uncapped brood from some good, strong colony, and re- place it with eggs or brood just hatched from the colony con- taining the queen from which itis desired to breed. By hav- ing placed one or two bright, new, empty combs in the midst of the brood-nest of this colony four days beforehand, we shall have in these combs just such eggs and newly hatching brood as we desire, with no brood that is too old. If we have more than one colony whose excellence war- rants their use to breed from, then these eggs should be taken from some other than the one which has produced our drones. This will prevent the close in-breeding which would neces- sarily occur if both queens and drones were reared in the same colony; and which, though regarded as deleterious in the breeding of all animals, should be practiced in case one single queen is of decided superiority to all others of the apiary. The queen and the brood that have been removed may be used in making a new colony, in a manner soon to be described under “Dividing or Increasing the Number of Colonies.’’ This queenless colony will immediately commence forming queen- cells (Fig. 93). Sometimes these are formed to the number of fifteen or twenty, and in case of the Syrian and Cyprian races fifty or sixty, andthey are started in a full, vigorous colony ; in fact, under the most favorable conditions. Cutting off edges of the comb, or cutting holesin the same where there OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 275 are eggs or larve just hatched, will almost always insure the starting of queen-cells in such places. It will be noticed that our queens are started from eggs, or from larve but just hatched, as we have given the bees no other, and so they are fed the royal pabulum from the first. Thus we have met every possible requisite to secure the most superior queens. As we removed all the brood the nurse-bees will have plenty of time, and be sure to care well for these young queens. By removal of the queen we also secure a large number of cells, while if we waited for the bees to start the cells preparatory to natural swarming, in which case we secure the two desirable condi- tions named above, we shall probably fail to secure so many cells, and may have to wait longer than we can afford. Even the apiarist who keeps black bees and desires no others, or who has only pure Italians, will still find that it pays to practice this selection, for, as with the poultry fancier, or the breeder of our larger domestic animals, the apiarist is ever observing some individuals of marked superiority, and he who carefully selects such queens to breed from, will be the one whose profits will make him rejoice, and whose apiary will be worthy of all commendation. It occursto me that in this matter of careful selection and improvement of our bees by breeding, rests our greatest opportunity to advance the art of bee-keeping. As will be patent to all, by the above process we exercise a care in breeding which is not surpassed by the best breeders of horses and cattlg,'and which no wise apiarist will ever neglect. Nor do I believe that Vogel can be correct in thinking that drones give invariably one set of character and the queens the others. This is contrary to all experience in breeding larger animals. It is often urged, and I think with truth, that we shall secure better queens if we wait for the queen-cells to be started naturally by the bees, under the swarming impulse; and by early feeding and adding brood from other colonies we can hasten this period; yet, if we feed to stimulate, whenever the bees are not storing, and keep the colony redundant in bees of all ages by adding plenty of capped brood from other colo- nies, we shall find that our queens are little, if any, inferior, even if their production is hastened by removal of a queen 276 THER BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; from the hive. If these directions are closely followed, there will be little brood for the beesto feed, and the queen-cells will not suffer neglect. Mr. Quinby not only advised this course, but he recommended starting queen-cells in nuclei; but he emphasized the importance of giving but very little brood, so nearly all the strength of the nurse-bees would be expended on the queen-cells. After we have removed all the queen-cells. in a manner soon to be described, we can again supply eggs, or newly- hatched larve—always from those queens which close obser- vation has shown to be the most vigorous and prolific in the apiary—and thus keep the same queenless colony or colonies engaged in starting queen-cells till we have all we desire. Yet we must not fail to keep this colony strong by the addition of capped brood, which we may take from any colony as most convenient. It is well also to feed a little each day in case the bees are not gathering. We must be cautious that our cells are started from only such brood as we take from the choicest queen. I have good reason to believe that queen-cells should not be started after the first of September, as I have observed that late qnecus are not only less prolific, but shorter lived. In nature, lute queens are rarely produced, andif it is true that they are inferior, it might be explainedin the fact that their ovaries remain so long inactive. As queens that are so long unmated are utterly worthless, so, too, freshly mated queens long inactive may become enfeebled. However, some of our queen-breeders think late queens just as good. Possibly they may be, if reared with the proper cautions. In eight or ten days the cells are capped, and the apiarist is ready to form his nuclei. For the rearing of a small num- ber of queens, the above is very satisfactory. If, however, we are rearing queens forthe market, in which we must have numerous cells at our command, and to ayoidcutting comb and to secure better spacing better methods have been devised. Mr. Henry Alley cut narrow single-celled strips of worker- ‘comb with newly-hatched larve, fastened these to the top-bar of his frame, or to bars inserted parallel to the top-bar, and by inserting the brimstone end of a match and turning it destroys each alternate larva. These put in a colony dequeened, but OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 277 with many young bees and much hatching brood, gave him good cells rightly spaced. Others have used drone comb cut in the same way, and in each alternate cell have inserted a little royal jelly from a queen-cell about ready to be capped, and then added a worker-larva. This accomplishes the same purpose, and mutilates no worker-comb. Mr. Doolittle, who has given much time to research in this line, first used the partially built queen-cells always to be found in every hive. These could be fixed to comb or cross- bars at pleasure, and by placing in eacha particle of royal jelly and a newly-hatched larva, he secured good queen-cells. If these were in a queenless colony with abundant young bees, the best of queens were reared. Mr. Doolittle found, what I am sure is true, that the best queens, bred naturally, were those reared before the natural swarm issued, or were always started as queens very early, if not from the egg itself, were reared with plenty of nurse or young bees in the hive, and in times, usually, of rapid gathering of honey. Mr. Doolittle found that he could not always get his queen-cups or incipient queen-cells when needed, and soon invented the valuable Fic. 129. Form for making Cups.—From A. I. Root Co. method of dipping and producing artificial cups at pleasure. He describes the whole method of discovery in his valuable and very interesting book. The mould, or dipping-stick (Fig. 129), is like a rake-tooth with one end fashioned so as just to fit into a good, normal queen-cell. This is immersed first in water, then for nine-sixteenths of an inch into melted wax which is kept melted by use of alamp. It is inserted seven or eight times alternately in the water and in the wax, but fora less and less distance each time in the latter. This makes the cup heavy and thick at the bottom andthin at the top. A twirling motion, when held at various angles, makes the walls 278 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE}; of the cup uniform. At leasta little pressure loosens the cell from the stick, when it is dipped once more and stuck to the strip (Fig. 130), which will hold itin the frame. Usually there are twelve or fourteen to one strip. This can be fastened close below the comb in a partly filled frame. A little royal jelly from a queen-cell just ready to be capped is now inserted in each cup, anda larva less than one day old, always with e, Fic. 130. Doolittle Cell-Cups.—From George W. York & Co. food about it, is transferred to this in precisely the same posi- tion it had in the worker-cell. Au ear-spoon or quill toothpick, cut and bent into a spoon-like form, or hard-wood stick of similar shape, is excellent to transfer the jelly and larve. One queen-cell will furnish enough jelly for from eight to twelve or fourteen cells. Of course, the larvz will be taken from the best queen in the apiary. To get these cells cared for, the frame is put in an upper story of a strong colony with a queen-excluding honey-board (Fig. 91) between two frames full of brood in all stages. They can be built out and finished below by using a perforated-zinc division-board (Fig. 88, 92), which will surely keep the queen away. It should be placed between the same kind of frames as when put above. In ten or twelve days we have probably twelve very fine capped queen-cells which can be easily removed. Mr. W. H. Pridgen, of North Carolina, has improved Mr. Doolittle’s scheme by a wholesale method of forming the cups. He fastens twelve or more of the dipping-sticks to a strip of OR, MANUAL OF THER APIARY. 279 wood and dips all of them at once. He even suggests that these may be mounted on the circumference of a wheel which carries them alternately through the water and wax and auto- matically raises so as to preserve the right depth in the melted waxeachtime. They may be inserted in close-filling holes in a narrow board so as to be quite easily moved up and down. ‘These are dipped till the cups are satisfactory, then all dipped once more at the end, touched to a narrow board (Fig. 131) to which they will adhere. Then by wetting the tips and Fic. 131, Pridgen Cell-Cups.—From George W. York & Co. board, the dipping-sticks are easily removed one at a time (Fig. 131). Each dipping-stick is five-eighths of an inch in diameter. It commences to taper five-sixteenths of an inch from the end, tapers strongly one-eighth of an inch, then grad- wally tothe end. The strips with cells adhering are one-half inch square, and are fastened in frames by a single wire nail at each end passing through the side of the frame and into the énd of the square piece. Comb may be close above them. As already explained, each worker brood-cellis lined with a sec- ond cell consisting of many cocoons. By cutting off the walls 280 THE BRE-KEREPER’S GUIDE; of old dark comb to within an eighth of an inch of the base by use of a sharp, warmed knife, these inner cells, which Mr. Pridgen and others call cocoons, may be easily loosened by bending the comb. These were first used by the Atchleys. He loosens them in this way, when they contain larve about a day old, from his pest queen. By pushing into these a trans- ferring stick, concave at the end (Fig. 132), he can raise the inner cell-larva, food and all, and insert them into a cup. This isa quick way to people the cells with larve. Mr. Pridgen often bores small five-sixteenth inch holes nearly through the stick to receive the cups, waxes the stick, and then presses the newly-formed cups into these. In this case he pushes them in with a stick much like the dipping-sticks, only longer andi trifle smaller. In these may be placed a little jelly and the larve as already described. Mr. Pridgen places these fora Fic. 132. _ Pridgen Transferring-Stick (full length and size.) —From Grorge W. York & Co. few hours in a hive which was filled with brood twelve days before, and placed with a queen-excluder on another colony. When he wishes to give the cups and larve, he removes the upper hive, shakes the bees that they may soon find that they are queenless, shuts them in over a broadly ventilated bottom- board, and in a few hours gives them the cups. They accept the care of these at once. He has had thirty-six received and fed in this way. Hesoon removes these to an upper story over a colony, with the queen-excluder, of course, between them. In from ten to twelve days he has a fine lot of cells for the: nuclei. Mr. Pridgen puts a comb partly-filled with water in the hive that is shut up. As we have seen, this would bea time when water would be very essential. The bees are con- fined and worried. While some queen-breeders still use the Alley method, most now use the Doolittle, and most will soon adopt the Pridgen improvement, as many have done already. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 281 NUCLEI. A nucleus is simply a miniature colony of bees—a hive and colony on a small scale—for the purpose of rearing and keeping queens. We want the queens, but can afford to each nucleus only a few bees. ‘The nucleus hive, if we use frames not more then one foot square, need be nothing more than an ordinary hive, with chamber confined bya division-board to the capacity of three frames. If our frames are large, then it may be thought best to construct special nucleus hives. These are small hives, which need not be more than six inches each way, that is, in length, breadth and thickness, and made to contain from four to six frames of corresponding size. These frames are filled with comb. I have for many years used the first-named style of nucleus hive, and have found it advanta- geous to have a few long hives made, each to contain five chambers ; while each chamber is entirely separate from the one next to it, is five inches wide, and is covered by a separate, close-fitting board, and the whole by acommon cover. The entrances to the twoend chambers are at the ends near the same side of the hive. The middle chamber has its entrance at the middle of the side near which are the end entrances, while the other two chambers open on the opposite side, as far apart as possible. The outside might be painted different col- ors to correspond with the divisions, if thought necessary, especially on the side with two openings. Yet I have never taken this precaution, nor have I been troubled much by losing queens. They have almost invariably entered their own apartments when returning from their wedding-tour. It seems from observation that the queen is more influenced by position than by color of hive in returning to it from mating. Who that has watched his bees after moving a hive a little one side of its previous position—even if only a few inches—can doubt but that the same is true of the worker-bees. These hives I use to keep queens in during thesummer. Except the apiarist engage in queen-rearing extensively as a business, I doubt the propriety of building such special nucleus hives. The usual hives are good property to have in the apiary, will soon be needed, and may be economically used for all nuclei. In 282 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; spring I make use of my hives which are prepared for pro- spective summer use, for my nuclei. Mr. E. M. Hayhurst, one of our best queen-breeders, uses the full-size Langstroth frame, in full-sized hives, for queen- rearing, while Mr. Root uses the same frames in small special hives which hold three frames. These (Fig. 119) he fastens high up on his grape-vine trellises, just back of his other hives, which can be used for seats as he works with the nuclei. We now goto different hives of the apiary, and take out three frames for each nucleus, at least one of which has brood, and so on, tillthere are as many nuclei prepared as we have queen-cells to dispose of. The bees should be left adhering to the frames of comb, only we must be certain that the queen is not among them, as this would take the queen from where she is most needed, and would lead to the sure destruction of one queen-cell. To be sure of this, we never take such frames till we have seen the queen, that we may be sure she is left behind. It is well to close the nucleus for at least twenty-four hours, so that enough bees will surely remain to cover the combs, and so prevent the brood from becoming chilled. Another good way to form nuclei, is to remove the queen from a full colony, and as soon as she is missed use all the frames and bees for nuclei. We form them as already described. In this way we are not troubled to find but one queen. If any desire the nuclei with smaller frames, these frames must of course be filled with comb, and then we can shake bees immediately into the nuclei, till they have sufficient to preserve a proper temperature. Such special articles about the apiary are costly and inconvenient. I believe that I should use hives even with the largest frames for nuclei. L. C. Root, who uses the large Quinby frame, uses the same for his nuclei. In this case we should need to give more bees. Twenty-four hours after we have formed this nucleus, we are ready to insert the queen-cell. We may do it sooner, even at once, but always at the risk of having the cell destroyed. To insert the queen-cell—for we are now to give one to each nucleus, so we can never form more nuclei than we have capped queen-cells—the old way was to cut it out, using a sharp thin-bladed knife, commencing to cut on either side the base of the cell, at least one-half inch OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 283 distant, for we must notin the least compress the cell, then cut- ting up and out for two inches, then across opposite the cell. This leaves the cell attached to a wedge-shaped piece of comb (Fig. 133), whose apexis next tothe cell. If we get our cells by the Doolittle or other improved methods, we can easily cut down and pry each cell off. A similar cut in the middle frame of the nucleus, which, in case of the regular frames, is the one containing brood, will furnish an opening to receive the wedge containing the cell. The comb should also be cut away Fie. 133. Grafted Queen-Cell.—_ From A. I, Root Co, Queen-Cell with Hinged Cap. From A. I. Root Co. beneath (Fig. 133), so that the cell can not be compressed. Mr. Root advises a circular cut (Fig. 133). Of late I have just placed the cell between two frames, and succeed just as weli. If two or more fine cells are so close together that separation is impossible, then all may be insertedin a nucleus. By close watching afterward we may save allthe queens. If we have used bright new comb as advised above, we can see the queen movein the cell if she is ready to come out, by holding it between us and the sun, and may uncap such cells, and let the 284 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; queen run in at the entrance of any queenless hive or nucleus atonce. In selecting combs for queen-cells, we should reject any that have drone-comb. Bees sometimes start queen-cells over drone-larve. Such cells are smoother than the others, and of course are worthless. After all the nuclei have received their cells and bees, they have only to be set in a shady place and watched to see that Fic. 134. Eutrance-Guard, sufficient bees remain. Should too many leave, give them more by removing the cover and shaking a frame loaded with bees over the nucleus; keep the opening nearly closed, and cover the bees so as to preserve the heat. The main caution Fic. 135. leita ee ee he es ee eee ee Drone-Trap.—From A. I. Root Co. in this zs fo be sure not to get any old queen in a nucleus. In two or three days the queens will appear, and in a week longer will have become fecundated, and that, too, in case of the first queens, by selected drones, for as yet there are no others in the apiary. Ican not over-estimate the advantage of always having extra queens. To secure mating from selected drones, later, we must cut alt drone-comb from inferior colonies, so that they shall rear no drones. If drone-larve are in uncapped cells, they may be killed by sprinkling the comb with cold water. By giving the jet of water some force, as may be easily done by use of a fountain pump, they may be washed out, or OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 285 we may throw them ont with the extractor, and then use the comb for starters in our sections. It is very important that those who rear queens to sell shall have no near neighbors who keep bees, and shall keep only very superior bees, that undesirable mating may be prevented. If one has neighbors who keep bees, he can see that they keep only the best, or possibly he can rear his queens before others have drones flying. He can also get his neigh- bor to use the Alley drone-trap (Fig. 135). If drones are flying from undesirable colonies, they can be kept from leaving the hive by use of the entrance-guards (Fig. 134), or may be cap- tured or destroyed by use of the Alley drone-trap (Fig. 135). These are made of the perforated-zinc, and while they permit the passage of the workers, they restrain the queen and drones. Fic. 136. N N N N N N N s N Ss N N AN Queen-Cage.—From A. I. Root Co, The spaces in these are .165. In England they make them .180 of an inch, but small queens may pass through these larger spaces. By shaking all the bees in front of the hive, we can, by use of these, soon weed out all the drones. With these in front of hive, we can keep the queen from leaving witha swarm. Occasionally, however, a queen will pass through unless the smaller spaced zinc is used. By keeping empty 286 THE BEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE; frames and empty cells in the nuclei, the bees may be kept active; yet with so few bees one can not expect very much from the nuclei. After cutting all the queen-cells from our old hive, we can again insert eggs, as above sug@ested, and obtain another lot of cells, or, if we have a:sufficient number, we can leave a single queen-cell, and this colony will soon be the happy possessor of a queen, and just as flourishing as if the even tenor of its ways had not been disturbed. If it is preferred, the bees of this colony may be used in forming the nuclei, in which case there is no danger of getting a queen in any nucleus thus formed, or of having the queen-cells destroyed. We can thus start seven or eight nuclei very quickly. Mr. Doolittle forms nuclei by disturbing the bees—jarring the hive—till they fill with honey, then shakes them intoa hive or box and sets them in a dark room or cellar for twenty-four hours. Then they will always, he says, accept a queen-cell or a virgin queen of any age at once. A full colony may be usually re-queened in the same way. QUEEN LAMP-NURSERY. This aid to bee-keeping was first used by F. R. Shaw, of Chatham, Ohio. The double wall enclosing water was the invention of A.I. Root. It is substantially a tin hive, with two walls enclosing a water-tight space an inch wide, which, when in use, is filled with water through a hole at the top. Each nursery may hold from six toeight frames. Some pre- fer to have special frames for this nursery,each of which contains several close chambers. The queen-cells are cut out and put in these chambers. By use of a common kerosene lamp placed under this nur- sery, the temperature must be kept from 80 degrees F. to 100 degrees F. By placing the frames with capped queen-cells in this, the queens develop as well asif ina hive or nucleus. If the young queens, just from the ceil, are introduced intoa queenless colony or nucleus, as first shown by Mr. Langstroth, they are usually well received. Uuless one is rearing a great many queens, this lamp-nursery is not desirable, as we still have to use the nucleus to get the young queens fecundated, have to watch carefully to get the young queens as soon as OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 287 they appear, must guard it carefully as moths are apt to get in, and, finally, unless great pains are taken, this method will give us inferior queens. Mr. W. Z. Hutchinson, one of our best queen-breeders, thinks very highly of the lamp-nursery. Some bee-keepers use a cage (Fig. 136) with projecting pins which are pushed into the comb, so that they hold the cage. Acellis put into each of these, and then they may be put into any hive. Of course the bees can not destroy the cell, as they can not get at it. Dr. Jewell Davis’ queen-nursery Fic. 137. QUEEN CELL een = SS Foop * "and Good GRY 3dVIS9, HOLDER (mal West Cell-Protector.—From A. I. Root Co. consists of a frame filled with such cages, which can be hung in any hive. I have tried both, and prefer this to the lamp- nursery. The West cell-protector (Fig. 137) is excellent. The cell can not be destroyed, and as the protector is open at the end the queen comes forth into the nucleus, and is almost sure to be well received. This is an excellent way to insert queen- cells. Mr. Root recommends putting a little honey at the end of the cell, so the queen will get this at once. Mr. Doolittle, to introduce virgins, puts them in a cage with candy, and covers the opening with paper, as well as candy, so as to delay her egress. Rarely they fail to eat through this, when they must be liberated. 288 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; SHALL WE CLIP THE QUEEN’S WING ? In the above operation, as in many other manipulations of the hive, we shall often gain sight of the queen, and can, if we desire, clip her wing, 7f she has met the drone; but never before, that in no case she shall lead the colony away to parts unknown. Thisis an old practice, for Virgil speaks of retaining the bees by tearing off the wings of ‘the king.”’ This does not injure the queen, as some have claimed. General Adair once stated that such treatment’ injured the queen, as it cut off some of the air-tubes, which view was approved by so excellent a naturalist as Dr. Packard. Yet Iam sure that this is alla mistake. The air-tube and blood-vessel, as we have seen, go to the wings to carry nourishment to these members. With the wing goes the necessity of nourishment and the need of the tubes. Aswellsay that the amputation of the human leg or arm would enfeeble the constitution, as it would cut off the supply of blood. Many of our best apiarists have practiced this clipping of the queen’s wing for years. Yet these queens show no diminu- tion of vigor; we should suppose they would be even more vigorous, as useless organs are always nourished at the expense of the organism, and, if entirely useless, are seldom long continued by nature. The ants set us an example in this matter, as they bite the wings off their queens, after mating has transpired. They mean that the queen shall remain at home, zolen volens, and why shall not we require the same of the queen-bee? Were it not forthe necessity of swarming in nature, we should doubtless have been anticipated in this mat- ter by Nature herself. Some of our first apiarists think that queens with wings clipped are not as acceptable to the other bees. I have now had experience for thirty years in this practice, and have yet to see the first indication that the aboveistrue. Still, if the queen essays to go with the swarm, and if the apiarist is not at hand, she will sometimes be lost, never regaining the hive; but in this case the bees will be saved, as ¢hey will return with- out fail. Many of our farmers are now keeping bees with marked success and large profits, who could not continue at OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 289 all except for this practice. Mr. GecrgeGrimm kept about eighty colonies of bees, and said he worked only ten days in the year. But he clipped the queens’ wings, and his wife did the hiving. Some apiarists clip one primary wing the first year, the secondary the second year, the other primary the third, and, if age of the queen permits,’the remaining wing the fourth year. Yet, such data, with other matters of interest and importance, better be kept on a slate or card, and firmly attached to the hive, or else kept in a record opposite the number of the hive. The time required to find the queen is sufficient argument against the ‘‘queen-wing record.’’ Thisis not an argument against the once clipping of the queen’s wings, for, in the nucleus hives, queens are readily found, and even in full colo- nies this is not very difficult, especially if we keep Italians or any other races of yellow bees. It will be best, even though we have to look up black queens in full colonies. The loss of one good colony, or the vexatious trouble of separating two or three swarms which had clustered together, and finding each queen, or the hiving of a colony perched high up on some towering tree, would soon vanquish this argument of time. To clip the queen’s wing, which we must never do until she commences to lay eggs, take hold of her wings with the right thumb and index finger—never grasp her body, especially her abdomen, as this will be very apt to injure her—raise her off the comb, then turn from the bees, place her gently on the left hand, and press on her feet with the left thumb sufficiently to hold her. Now with the right hand, by use of a small, delicate. pair of scissors, cut off about one-half of one of the front or primary wings. ‘This method prevents any movement of legs or wings, and is easy and quick. I think Mr. Root advises grasping the queen bythe thorax. I preferthe method given here. Some bee-keepers—inexperienced they must be—complain that queens thus handled often receive a foreign scent, and are destroyed by the worker-bees. I have clipped hundreds and never lost one. LAYING WORKERS. We have already described laying workers, As these can 290 THH BEEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE; only produce unimpreginated eggs, they are, of course, value- less, and unless superseded by a queen will soon cause the destruction of the colony. As their presence often prevents the acceptance of cells or a queen, by the common workers, they areaserious pest. The absence of worker-brood, and the abundant and careless deposition of eggs—some cells being skipped, while others have received several eggs—are pretty sure indications of their presence. The condition that favors Fic. 138. Hive-Scraper.—Original. these pests, is continued absence of a queen or means to pro- duce one; thus they are very likely to appear in nuclei. They seem more common with the Cyprian and Syrian bees. To rid a colony of these, unite it with some colony witha good queen, after which the colony may be divided if very strong. Simply exchanging places of a colony with a laying worker, and a good, strong colony will often cause the destruc- tion of the wrong-doer. In this case, brood should be given to the colony which had the laying worker, that they may reara queen ; or better, a queen-cell or queen should be given them. Caging a queen in a hive, with a laying worker, for thirty-six hours, wili almost always cause the bees to accept her. We may also use the Doolittle candy cage with the opening covered with paper. Her escape is so tardy that she will be safe. Shaking the bees off the frames two rods from the hive, will often rid them of the counterfeit queen, after which they will receive a queen-cell or a queen. But prevention is best of all. We should never have a colony or nucleus without eithera queen or means to rear one. It is well to keep young brood in our nucleiat all times. Queens reared from brood four days from the egg are often drone-layers, and never desirable. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 291 In all manipulation ‘with the bees we need something to loosen the frames. Many use a chiselor smallironclaw. I have found an iron scraper (Fig. 138), which I had made by a blacksmith, very convenient. It serves to loosen the frames, draw tacks, and scrape off propolis. It would be easy to add the hammer. QUEBEN-REGISTER OR APIARY REGISTER. With more than a half dozen colonies it is not easy to know just the condition of each colony. Something to mark the date of each examination, and the condition of the colony Fie. 139. QUEEN REGISTER. got Mag, EGGS. RY 2 No. S oe MISSING. BROOD. & ° = & fs NOT APPROVED. o CELL. Ce, ¢ lb gry yS° Sra \ APPROVED. HACTHED. MARCH. ocT. APRIL. LAYING. DIRECTIONS.— Tack the card ona enor evens pee or SEPT. 0 MAY. A aye OT inte the center et each incle, oher it isben, AUC JUNE in such a manner that the head will press securely on any figure or word. These Cards mailed free, at 6c. per doz. JULY. or 40c. per hundred. : 4 Use tinned or galvanized tacks; they will stand rain, &. A. I, Root, MEDINA, O. at that time is very desirabic. Mr. Root furnishes the Queen- Register (Fig. 139). With this it is very easy to mark the date of examination of each hive, and the condition of the colony at the time. Mr. Hutchinson prefers this. Mr. Newman fur- nished an Apiary Register which served admirably for the same purpose. Each hive is numbered. Dr. Miller tacks a small square piece of tin bearing the number in black paint to 292 THE BHH-KERPER’S GUIDE: each hive. A corresponding number in the Register gives us all desired facts. We have only to note down at the time the condition of each colony and date of examination in the Regis- ter. Mr. Root prefers a slate whose position on the cover of the hive shows the condition of colony, and dates can be writ- ten on it. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 293 CHAPTER X. INCREASE OF COLONIES. No subject will be of more interest to the beginner than that of increasing colonies. He has one or two, he desires as many more, or, if very aspiring, as many hundred, and if a Jones, a Hetherington, or a Harbison, as many thousand. This isa subject, too, that may well engage the thought and study of men of no inconsiderable experience. I believe that many veterans are not practicing the best methods in obtaining an increase of colonies. Before proceeding to name the ways, or to detail the methods, let me state and enforce that it is always safest, and generally wisest, especially for the heginner, to be content with doubling, or certainly with tripling, his number of colo- nies each season Especially let all remember the motto: ‘“ Keep all colonies strong.” There are two ways to increase: The natural, known as swarming, already described under natural history of the bee ; and the artificial, improperly styled artificial swarming. This is also called, and more properly, ‘‘ dividing.”’ SWARMING. In case of the specialist, or in case some one can be near by to watch the bees, swarming is without doubt the best way to increase. Therefore, the apiarist should be always ready with both means and knowledge for immediate action. Of course, necessary hives were all secured the previous winter, and will never be wanting. Neglect to provide hives before the swarming season is convincing proof that the wrong pur- suit has been chosen. If, as I have advised, the queen has her wing clipped, the matter becomes very simple, in fact, so much simplified that were there no other argument, this would be sufficient to 294 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; recommend the practice of clipping the queen’s wing. Now, if several swarms cluster together, we have not to separate them ; they will usually separate of themselves and return to their old homes. To migrate without the queen means death, and life is sweet even to bees. and is not willingly to be given up except for home and kindred. Even if they all enter one hive, the queens are not with them, and it is very easy to divide them as desired. Neither has the apiarist to climb trees, to secure his bees from bushy trunks, from off the lattice- work or pickets of his fence, from the very top of a tall, slen- der, fragile fruit-tree, or other most inconvenient places. Nor will he even be tempted to pay his money for patent non- swarming hivers or patent swarm-catchers, He knows his bees will return to their old quarters, so he is not perturbed by the fear of loss or plans to capture the unapproachable. It requires no effort ‘‘to possess his soul in patience.’’ If he wishes to increase, he steps out, takes the queen by the remaining wings, as she emerges from the hive, soon after the bees commence their hilarious leave-taking, puts her in a cage, opens the hive, destroys, or, if he wishes to use them, cuts out the queen-cells as already described, gives more room —either by adding a super of sections or taking out some of the frames of brood, as they may well be spared—places the cage enclosing the queen under the quilt, and leaves the bees to return at their pleasure. At nightfall the queen is liber- ated, the hive may be removed to another place, and very likely the swarming-fever is subdued for the season. If it is desired to unite the swarm with a nucleus, exchange the places of the old hive with the caged queen, as soon as the swarm is out, and the nucleus hive, to which, of course, the swarm will now come. The queen-cells should be removed at once from the old hive, and the queen liberated. The nucleus colony, now strongly enforced, should have empty frames, but always with starters, added, making five in all; and a super of sections with thin foundation added at once. ‘lhe five frames Langstroth size, more if smaller—are put on one side and the rest of the space filled by division-boards. Here the nucleus is at once transformed into a large, strong colony. If it is desired to hive the swarm separately—and usually OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 295 this gives the best results, even if we do not care for increase —we remove the old hive to one side, and turn it entirely around, so that the entrance that was eastis now west. We now place a new hive with five or six empty frames, which have narrow starters, right where the old hive previously stood, in which the caged queen is put. We fill the extra space in this hive with division-boards, and set on it the super of sections previously placed on the old hive; or in case this colony that just swarmed had not previously received a super of sections, we place a super witha queen-excluding honey- board on the hive where the new swarm is now to enter. As this colony has no comb in the brood-chamber, only foundation starters, and has sections with comb or thin foun- dation, the bees will commence to work vigorously in the sec- tions, especially as the brood-chamber is so restricted. This idea originated with Messrs. Doolittle and Hutchinson, and is fully explained in ‘‘ Advanced Bee-Culture,’’ Mr. Hutchinson’s excellent book, which should be in the hands of every comb- honey producer. . The hive from which the swarm issued—now close besid the hive with the new colony—should be turned a little each day so that by the eighth day the entrance will be as before to the east, or close to that of the other hive. On the eighth day this hive is carried to some distant part of the bee-yard. Of course all the bees that are gathering—and by this time they are numerous—will go to the other hive, which will so weaken the still queenless colony that they will not care to send out another or second swarm, and so will destroy all remaining queen-cells and queens after the first queen comes forth. This isa quick, easy way to prevent after, or second, swarms. It originated with Mr. James Heddon, andI find that, with rare exception, it works well. I believe where one is with his bees, this last-described plan is the most profitable that the bee- keeper can adopt. Sometimes the mere introducing of a new queen into the old hive will prevent any further swarming. The queen at once destroys the queen-cells. Some extensive apiarists, who desire to prevent increase of colonies, when a colony swarms, cage the old queen, destroy all queen-cells, and exchange this hive—after taking out three ‘3 296 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; or four frames of brood to strengthen nuclei, replacing these with frames with starters of foundation—with one that recently swarmed, which was previously treated the same way. Thus acolony that recently sent out a swarm, but retained their queen, has probably, from the decrease of bees, loss of brood, and removal of queen-cells, lost the swarming-fever, and if we give them plenty of room and ventilation, they will accept the bees froma new swarm, and spend their future energies in storing honey. If the swarming-fever is not broken up, we shall only have to repeat the operation again in a few days. Still another modification, in case no increase of bees but rather comb honey is desired, is recommended by such apia- rists as Doolittle, Davis, and others. The queen is caged seven days, the queen-cells in the hive are then destroyed, the queen liberated, and everything is arranged for immense yields of comb honey. In this case the queen is idle, but the bees seem to have lost not one jot of theirenergy. I tried this plan many years ago with great success, and recommended it to Mrs. L. B. Baker, who prized it highly. Dr. C. C. Miller, instead of caging the queen, places her with a nucleus on top of the old hive, thus keeping her at work, by exchange of frames. After seven days he destroys the queen-cells in the old hive and unites the nucleus with it. Here the queenis kept at work, the swarming impulse subdued, and a mighty colony made ready for business. This plan slightly modified has the sanc- tion of such admirable apiarists as Messrs. Elwood and Hetherington. ‘Two objections are sometimes raised right here. Suppose several swarms issue at once, one of which is a second swarm, which’of course has a virgin queen, then all will go off together, and our lossis grevous indeed. I answer that sec- ond swarms are unprofitable, and should never be permitted. We should be so vigilant that this fate would never befall us. If we will not give this close attention without such stimulus, then it were well to have this threatening danger hanging over us. Again, suppose we are not right at hand when the swarm issues, the queen wanders away and is lost. Yes, but if unclipped the whole colony would go, now it is only the queen. Usually the queen gets back. If not,a little looking will OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 297 generally find her not far away within a ball of friendly workers. At nightfall smoke these bees, and by watching we learn the colony which swarmed, as the bees about the queen will repair at once to it. Mr. Doolittle suggests that we may always find what colony swarmed when a swarm is out. If we take a portion of the bees from the cluster into a pail and swing them around lively, then throw them out, they will at once, he says, fly to the old home. When aswarm first issues, young bees, too young to fly, crawling about the hive, will often reveal the colony that swarmed. HIVING SWARMS. But in clipping wings, some queens may be omitted, or, from taste, or other motive, some bee-keepers may not desire to ‘‘deform her royal highness.’”” Then the apiarist must possess the means to save the would-be rovers. The means are: good hives in readiness ; some kind of a brush—a turkey- wing will do; a basket with open top, which should be at least eighteen inches in diameter, and so made that it may be attached to the end of the pole; and two poles, one very long and the other of medium length. Now, let us attend to the method: As soon as the cluster commences to form, place the hive in position where we wish the colony to remain, leaving the entrance wide open. As soon as the bees are fully clustered, we must manage as best we can to empty the whole cluster in front of the hive. As the bees are full of honey they are not likely to sting, but will sometimes. JI have known bees, when clustered in a swarm, to be very cross. This, however, is not usual. Should the bees be on a twig that could be sacrificed, this might be easily cut off with either a knife or saw (Fig. 140), and so carefully as hardly to disturb the bees, then carry (Fig. 76) and shake the bees in front of the hive, when with joyful hum they will at once proceed to enter. If the twig must not be cut, shake them all into the basket, and empty before the hive. Should they be on a tree trunk, or a fence, then brush them with the wing into the basket, and proceed as before. If they are high up on a tree, take the pole and basket, and perhaps a ladder will also be necessary. Many devices like a bag on a hoop,a 298 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; Fic. 140, Whitman's Fountain Pump. —From A. I, Loot Co. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 299 suspended wire-basket, with a tripod to sustain it, etc., are often recommended. These are not much seen in the apiaries of our best bee-keepers. Always let ingenuity have its perfect work, not forgetting that the object to be gained is to get just as many of the bees as is possible on the alighting-board in front of the hive. Carelessness as to the quantity might involve the loss of the queen, which would be serious. The bees wi// not remain unless the queen enters the hive. Should a cluster form where it is impossible to brush or shake them off, they can be driven into a basket, or hive, by holding it above them and blowing smoke among them. All washes for the hive are more than useless. It is better that it be clean and pure. With such, if they are shaded, bees will generally be satisfied. But assurance will be made doubly sure by giving them a frame of brood, in all stages of growth, from an old hive. This may be inserted before the work of hiving is commenced. Mr. Doolittle thinks this does little or no good, and tends to induce the building of drone-comb. Mr. Bet- singer says they are even more apt to gooff ; but I think he will not be sustained by the experience of other apiarists. He certainly is not by mine. I never knew but one colony to leave uncapped brood ; I have often known them to swarm out of an empty hive once or twice, and to be returned, after brood had been placed in the hive, when they accepted the changed conditions, and went at once to work. We should expect this, in view of the attachment of bees for their nest of brood, as also from analogy. How eager the ant to convey her larve and pupze—the so-called eggs—to a place of safety, when the nest has been invaded and danger threatens. Bees doubtless have the same desire to protect their young, and as they can not carry them away to a new home, they remain to care for them in one that may not be quite to their taste. Of course if swarming is permitted either with or without clipped queens, the bees must be closely watched at the swarming season. Dr. Miller secures a bright, active girlor boy to watch. Hesays the watcher can sit in the shade and go and look once in every four or five minutes. For 100 colonies it takes the whole time of one person, as the noise made by somany flying bees makes actual inspection of all hives necessary. This watching is 300 THE BEE-KEERPER’S GUIDE; necessary from 8 a.m. till 2 p.m.; or in very best weather from 6a.m.to4p.m., or even later. Of course there is relief on rainy days. Farmers can keep many colonies and attend to their farm work as usual. They have only to have a boy or girl to catch and cage the queens—the ‘‘ gude wife’’ may do this—and inform at noon or night what colonies have swarmed. When acolony swarms, the impulse seems to be general, and often a half dozen colonies will be on the wing in atrice. ‘These will very often—generally, in truth—cluster together. In this case, to find the queens is well nigh impossible, and we can only divide up the bees into suitable colonies, and as soon as we find any starting queen-cells, givethem a queen. Of course we may lose every queen but one. In view of this trouble, and the expense and doubtful practicality of the various swarm-catchers in vogue, I would say, Clip the queen's wing. If no more colonies are desired, the swarm may be given to acolony which has previously swarmed, after removing from the latter all queen-cells, and adding to the room by putting on the sections, and removing some frames of . brood to strengthen nuclei. These frames may be replaced with empty combs, foundation, or frames with starters. We may even return the bees to their old home, by taking the same precautionary measures, with a good hope that storing and not swarming will engage their attention in future ; and if we change their position, or better, exchange their position with that of a nucleus, we shall be still more likely to succeed in overcoming the desire toswarm. A swarm may be given toa colony that was hived as a swarm a day or two before with great safety, by shaking all the bees of bothin front of the hive. Some seasons, usually when honey is being gathered each day for long intervals, but not in large quantities, the desire and determination of some colonies to swarm is im- placable. Room, ventilation, changed position of hive, each and all will fail. Then we can do no better than to gratify the propensity by giving the swarm a new home, and make an effort. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 301 TO PREVENT SKCOND SWARMS. The Heddon method of preventing second swarms has already been explained. This method is valuable because it requires no looking up of queen-cells, and thus saves time. As already stated, the wise apiarist will always have on hand extra queens. Now, if he does not desire to form nuclei (as already explained), and thus use these queen-cells, he will at once give the old colony a fertile queen. At the same time this practice secures only carefully reared queens from his best colonies. As the queen usually destroys all queen-cells, farther swarming is prevented. The method of introduction will be given hereafter, though in such cases there is very little danger incurred by giving them a queen at once. If desired, the queen-cells can be used in forming nuclei, in man- ner before described. If extra queens are wanting, we have only to look carefully—very carefully, as it is easy to missa small, worthless cell in some cranny or corner of the comb— through the old hive and remove all but one of the queen-cells. A little care will certainly make sure work, as after swarming the old hive is so thinned of bees that only carelessness will overlook queen-cells in such a quest. Mr. Doolittle waits till the eighth day, or till he hears the piping of the young queen ; then cuts out all queen-cells, when, of course, he cer- tainly inhibits second swarms. When this practice fails, as it very rarely does, it is because two cells were left. TO PREVENT SWARMING. As yet wecan only partly avert it. Mr. Quinby offered a large reward for a perfect non-swarming hive, and never had tomake the payment. Mr. Hazen attempted it, and partially succeeded, by granting much space tothe bees, so that they should not be impelled to vacatefor lack of room. The Quinby hive, already described, by the large capacity of the brood- chamber, and ample opportunity for top and side storing, looks to the same end. Mr. Simmins, of England, thinks he can prevent swarming by keeping unoccupied cells between the brood-nest and entrance to the hive. Mr. Muth says if we always have empty cells in the brood-nest swarming will sel- 302 THER BEE-KEHPER’S GUIDE; dom occur. Yet he says ‘‘seldom.’’ We may safely say that a perfect non-swarming hive or system is not yet before the bee-keeping public. The best aids toward non-swarming arc shade, ventilation, and roomy hives. Butas we shall seein the sequel, much room in the brood-chamber, unless we work for extracted honey—by which means we may greatly repress the swarming fever—prevents our obtaining honey in a desir- ablestyle. If we add sections, unless the connection is quite free—in which case the queen is apt to enter them and greatly vex us—we must crowd some to send the bees into the sections. Such crowding is almost sure to lead to swarming. I have, by uncapping the combs of honey in the brood-chamber, as sug- gested tome years ago by Mr. M. M. Baldridge—causing the honey to run down from the combs—sent the bees crowding to the sections, and thus deferred or prevented swarming. Those who have frames that can be turned upside down, or invertible hives, may often secure the same results by simple inversion. By placing the sections in the brood-chamber till the bees commence to work on them, and then removing them above, or by carrying brood up beside the sections, the bees are gen- erally induced to commence working in sections. Some sec- tions with combs in them often aids much. ‘This requires too much manipulation, and so is not practical with the general bee-keeper. It is possible that by extracting freely when storing is very rapid, and then by freely feeding the extracted honey in the interims of honey-secretion, we might prevent swarming, secure very rapid breeding, and still get our honey in sections. My experiments in this direction have not been as successful as I had hoped, and I can not recommend the practice, though some apiarists claim to have succeeded. Even if this could be made to work it involves too much labor to make it advisable. The keeping of colonies queenless, in order to secure honey without increase, is practiced and advised by some even of our distinguished apiarists. As already stated, I have done this with excellent results. Dr. C. C. Miller’s method, already described, accomplishes the same object, and keeps all the queens at work all the time. OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 303 ARTIFICIAL INCREASE. While, as already remarked, there is no better way than to . allow swarming as just described, when one’s circumstances make it possible todo so, yet itis true that some of our best bee-keepers prefer to divide. In somecases the bee-keeper can be with his bees only at certain times—often early in the morning, late in the afternoon, or perchance at the noontide hour; then, of course, artificial dividing becomes necessary. It is practiced to secure any desired increase of colonies, also to prevent loss from swarming when no one is by. This requires more time than swarming, as detailed above, and may not— probably often doos not—secure quite as good results. Yet I am very sure, from a long experience, that, with sufficient care, artificial colonies may be formed that will fully equal natural swarms in the profits they bring to their owners. Iam sure I could get ten colenies from one in a season, and if I had combs and should feed I think I could nearly double these figures. HOW TO DIVIDE. Mr. Cheshire argues against natural swarming and in favor of dividing, as the former tends, through selection, to develop the swarming habit. I do not accept his reasoning, as, unless we permit swarming, we can not tell what colonies to breed from, as we have no way to know their tendencies. Often, too, swarming only indicates great prolificness. By the process already described, we have secured a goodly num- ber of fine queens, which will be in readiness at the needed time. Now, as soon asthe white clover harvest is well com- menced, early in June, we may commence operations. If we have but one colony to divide, it is well to wait till they become pretty populous, but not untilthey swarm. Take one of our waiting hives, which now holdsa nucleus with laying queen, and place the same close alongside the colony we wish to divide. This must be done on a warm day, when the bees are active, and better be done while the bees are busy, in the mid- dle of the day. Remove the division-board of the new hive, and then remove five combs well loaded with brood, and. of course, containing some honey, from the wld colony, bees and all, tothe new hive. Also take the remaining frames and 304 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE}; shake the bees into the new hive; only be sure that the queen still remains in the old hive. Fill both the hives with empty frames—if the frames are filled with empty comb it will be still better; if not, it will always pay to give at least starters of comb or foundation—and return the new hive to its former position. The old bees will return to the old colony, while the young ones will remain peaceably with the new queen. The old colony will now possess at least seven frames of brood, honey, etc., the old queen, and plenty of bees, so that they will work on as though naught had transpired, though perhaps moved to a little harder effort, by the added space and five empty combs or frames with starters or full sheets of founda- tion. These last may all be placed at one end, or placed between the others, though not so as greatly to divide brood. The new colony will have eight frames of brood, comb, etc., three from the nucleus and five from the old colony, a young laying queen, plenty of bees(those of the previous nucleus and the young bees from the old colony), and will work with a sur- prising vigor, often even eclipsing the old colony. If the apiarist has several colonies, it is better to make the new colony-from several old colonies, as follows: Take one frame of brood-comb from each of six old colonies, or two from each of three. and carry them, bees and all, and place with the nucleus. Be sure that no queen is removed. Fillall the hives with empty combs, or frames with starters of foun- dation, as before. In this way we increase without in the’ least disturbing any of the colonies, and may add a colony every day or two, or perhaps several, depending on the size of our apiary, and can thus almost always, so experience says, prevent swarming. By taking only brood that is allcapped, we can safely add one or two frames to each nucleus every week, without adding any bees, asthere would be no danger of loss by chilling the brood. In this way, as we remove no bees, we have to spend no time in looking for the queen, and may build up our nuclei into full colonies, and keep back the swarming impulse with great facility. These are unquestionably the best methods to divide, and so I will not complicate the subject by detailing others. The OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 305 only objection that can be urged against them—and even this does not apply to the last—is that we must seek out the queen in each hive, or at least be sure that we do not remove her, though this is by no means so tedious if we have Italians or other races of yellow bees, as, of course, we all will. I might give other methods which would render unnecessary this cau- tion, but, to my mind, they are inferior, and not to be recom- mended. If we proceed as above described, the bees will sel- dom prepare to swarm at all, and, if they do, they will be dis- covered in the act, by such frequent examinations, and the work may be cut short by at once dividing such colonies, as first explained, and destroying their queen-cells, or, if desired, using them for forming new nuclei. CAPTURING ABSCONDING SWARMS. Sometimes swarms break cluster and take wing for their prospective home before the bee-keeper has hived them. Throwing dirt among them will sometimes cause them to alight again. ‘Throwing water among them in the form of a fine spray (Fig. 140) will almost alwaysdo this. For such pur- pose some hand pump is very desirable. Whitman’s fountain pump is one of the most convenient. It costs about $7.00. Another important use for such a pumpin the apiary is this: If a swarm, when clustered, is sprinkled occasionally, it will remain clustered indefinitely. This permits us to retain a swarm in case it is more convenient to hive it later. While most customs have a reasonable basis, the common one of horns and bells and beating of pans to stop a swarm is a nota- ble exception. It does not do the least good. 306 THH BEE-KEEPHR’S GUIDE} CHAPTER XI ITALIANS AND ITALIANIZING. The history and description of Italian bees have already been considered, so it only remains to discuss the subject ina practical light. The superiority of the Italians seems no longer a mooted question. I now know of no one among the able apiarists in our country who takes the ground that a thorough balancing of qualities will make as favorable a showing for the German as for the Italian bees, though I think that the late Baron of Berlepsch held to this view. I think Iam capable of acting as judge on this subject. I have never sold a dozen queens in my life, and so have not been unconsciously influenced by self-interest. In fact, I have never had, if I except six years, any direct interest in bees at all, and all my work and experiments had only the promotion and spread of truth as the ultimatum. Again, I have kept both blacks and Italians side by side, and carefully observed and noted results during eight years of my experience. I have carefully collected data as to increase of brood, rapidity of storing, early and late habits in the day and season, kinds of flowers visited, amiability, etc., and Iam more than persuaded that the general verdict, that they are superior to the German race, is entirely correct. The Italians are far superior to the German bees in many respects, and, though I am acquainted with all the works on apiculture printed in our language, and have an extensive acquaintance with the leading apiarists of our country from Maine to California, yet I know hardly a man that has opportunity to form a correct judgment, does not give strong preference to the Italians. The black bees are in some respects superior to the Italians, and if a bee-keeper’s methods cause him to give these points undue importance, in forming his judgments, then his conclusions may be wrong. Faulty management, too, may lead to wrong conclusions. f OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 307 The Italians certainly possess the following points of superiority : first. They possess longer tongues, and so can gather from flowers which are useless to the black bee. This point has already been sufficiently considered. How much value hangs upon this structural peculiarity Iam unable to state. I have frequently seen Italians working on redclover. I never saw a black bee thus employed. It is easy to see that this might be, at certain times and certain seasons, a very material aid. How much of thesuperior storing qualities of the Italians is due to this lengthened ligula, Iam unable tosay. Mr. J. H. Martin hasa very ingenious tongue measurer by which the length of the tongues of beesin the several hives can be quickly and accurately compared. I have made a very simple and convenient instrument to accomplish the same end; two rectangular pieces, one of glass and the other of wire gauze, are so set in a frame that the glass inclines to the gauze. At one end they touch; at the other they are separated three- fourths of aninch. Honey is spread onthe glassand all set in the hive. The bees can only sip the honey through the gauze. The bees that clean the farthest from the end where it touches the gauze have the longest tongues. This gives only relative lengths, while Mr. Martin’s register tells the absolute length. Second. They are more active, and, with the same oppor- tunities, will collect a good deal more honey. This is a matter of observation, which I have tested over and over again. Yet I will give the figures of another: Mr. Doolittle secured from two colonies 309 pounds and 301 pounds, respectively, of comb honey, during the one season. These surprising figures, the best he could give, were from his best Italian colonies. Similar testimony comes from Klein and Dzierzon over the sea, and from hosts of our own apiarists. Third. They work earlier and later. This is not only true of the day, but of the season. Oncool days in spring I have seen the dandelions swarming with Italians, while not a black bee was to be seen. On May 7, 1877, I walked less than half a mile, and counted sixty-eight bees gathering from dandelions, yet only two were black bees. This might be considered an 308 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; undesirable feature. Yet, from careful observation covering thirty years, I think that Italian bees are quite as apt to win- ter well and pass the spring months without harm as are black bees. Fourth. They are far better to protect their hives against robber-bees. Robbers that attempt to plunder Italians of their hard-earned stores soon find that they have ‘‘dared to beard the lion in his den.’ This is so patent that even the advo- cates of black bees are ready to concede it. Fifth. They are proof against the ravages of the bee- moth’slarve. Thisis also universally conceded. This is no very great advantage, as no respectable bee-keeper would dread moths, even with the black bees. Sixth. The queens are decidedly more prolific. This is probably in part due to the greater and more constant activity of the workers. This is observable at all seasons, but more especially when building upin the spring. Noone who will take the pains to note the increase of brood will long remain in doubt on this point. Seventh. They are less apt to breed in winter, when it is desirable to have the bees very quiet. Eighth. 'The queen is more readily found, which is a great advantage. In the various manipulations of the apiary, it is frequently desirable to findthe queen. In fullcolonies I would rather find three Italian queens than one black one. Where time is money this becomes a matter of much importance. Ninth. The bees are more disposed to adhere to the comb while being handled, which some might regarda doubtful compliment, though I consider it a desirable quality. Tenth. They are, in my judgment, less liable to rob other bees. ‘They will find honey when the blacks gather none, and the time for robbing is when there is no gathering. This may explain the above peculiarity. Eleventh. In my estimation, a sufficient ground for pref- erence, did it stand alone, is that the Italian bees are far more amiable. Years agol got rid of my black bees because they were socross. srerete 380 Marriage-fight.. 0.46 cv. esss ae 112 Mason bees..........-.....50 2 Mating Of queet., : .a.5 6 cans ad 112 Matrimony-vine .... ......... 430 Mature insects................ DES R oie omine g gig a ob iag dete s Meal feeding of . Meal-beetle.... 4 Megtenile: oss 52 cock cusaareess COBOL sisiss.dghecascereinewr Hoa MICO voi aac vienna isis niente Seabee Bieropg le. oases ey gonna exe MICROSCOPE oe caees cena de ead figurocofas ss xuces vay ns yese Mignonette ......5.:s005sa0004 ROOT ON ics Cine atavsinas Mile weed | cscs paae egies sean 538 INDEX. Milkweed— (Continued) : figure Of pisces acacia sees 422 DOOD: OF ssc sinc sce sine wiv wees 424 | Open sections....,............ 240 figure of.. ... 424 | Order of honey-bee.. a5 Miller, Dr. C. C. aoe 16 | OBMIDs eee os oe 43 MANNDCNS « «004s dames vases toad EN ABER he oye taney seh ee ara 93 DUMICTY 4 2 5 volun ss Mane ess ssi 8D Hwure Ofni4s4sseeas sade 94 MGS vcni cease cieee aoee ... 422 of laying workers......... 130 ABUT SH OL sistas cuscy W asnice ne 5auseeds 422 figure of.............. 130 MULES), bins czin eg oikewe auideaacate @ 506 of Worker..............005 130 fIZUPO OF 0. asics vara oowne =e 506 figure of.............. 130 Moth (see bee-moth).......... 482. | -Oviduet: ss caus «sensi cone esas as 95 Motherwort......... .. 422 PLUTO OL aie occ scags sxsrscanens ionsden 6 423 | Packing-box.................. 458 Moulting............... 89, 98, 184 figure of.......... Spiele the 458 Mountain-laurel .............. 441 | Pails for honey ............... 377 figure of............. seven 44L Hgure. Of: s weae wes esas se 377 Mountain-mint ..... ......... 443 | Palestine bees ................ 55 Mouth organs.............. 66, 13l, | Palmetto: oo o5 cic. asus odie ee 445 BOUL OF sy wes enies 6 vices a4 67, 182 figure Of... cee ceunis ese Fx 448 Movable-frame hives.......... QOS | PAIRS, kee odaawn been .oteed 412, 446 BIRIGUR Oly oye des ex ees er 209 | Papers (see bee- Papers) twee 45a 22 Moving bees.................. 206 | Paraglossa..... . ..... . 67 Moving colonies .............. B19 | Parasites os4 csciseisate caiae . of Munn hive.................... Parker foundation fastener.... 361 figure of AISLES: Ole. igi didsinovuans ¢ gasiong ave 361 Muscles of insects Parthenogenesis .............. 114 MUERTE: sce cates caéss cee one Partridge-pea ..............045 429 figure of figure Oly « css ssaxsuscex os 429 Muth, 6 Biescscesuscsedie avai w ote PaBLUTAZE. sce ieiis psacsey ogee ace Muth bottles Peet-cage..... ccc cece e ee ees figure of... ‘ figure of MPTIOWOE: 35 au ncond ncaa ooo Pepper ...... figure of INGCHAR sO cacis wamenstiney sume . 171 | Perforated zinc ............... 219 digestion .... ............ 171 | Periodicals (see papers)....... 22 Nervous system of insects..... Bl | Persimmon o4 oiscie iene cence