i”. ae ares xs Se makes aX es en 5 No BOS wpa Se TT, 1924 090 302 112 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924090302112 THE HUNTER-NATURALIST. ROMANCE OF SPORTING; oR, WILD SCENES AND WILD HUNTERS. | By ©. W. WEBBER, AUTHOR OF “gHOT IN THE EYE,” “OLD IMICKS THE GUIDE,” “ONARLES WINTERFIELD PAPERS,” “GOLD MINES OF THE GILA,” ETC. ETC. PHILADELPHIA: J B. LIPPINCOTT & CO. 1865., MHD Seed. Col? Sk 35 w37¥ B57 Enxterep according to Act of Congress, in the year 1852, by LIPPINCOTT. GRAMBO & CO. in the Clerk’s Office of the District Uvurt of the Eastern District of Pennsy!vama. INTRODUCTION. Tue first volume of the Hunter-Naturauist is merely introductory to what I propose to make, in every sense, a ‘‘ progressive” series of seven volumes. My cherished object in this undertaking is, to introduce within the general scope of Polite Literature, a popular Natural History: upon the production of which I have so brought to bear the latest discoveries of Science, in the application of mechanical forces to pictorial illustration, as to cheapen all their cost without any deterioration of artistic value; and bring the essential spirit of what have been here- tofore as sealed books, from their excessive costliness, within the reach of the People. Then, again, what I mean by “popular” is to be found in a regard of the highest sense of this vulgarized and misused term in contrast with that of the scholastic use of “technical’’—a work belonging rather to the general litera- ture than technical science of Natural History—treating of its facts as well as cognate associations. A work, indeed, aiming to be as gay as it is grave—as fanciful as it is profound—as theoretical as accurate—as full of flesh and blood as of philosophy—as human as it is transcendental— as rhapsodically intoxicate as the hale air and blithe sunshine out-of-doors can make it—and just sufficiently spiced with “learning” not to make one “mad.” A work in which the Animal Kingdom shall illustrate the Spiritual, and the Spirit- ual the Animal, as well. A work in which Bird and Beast shall be humanized to Man through Nature, and Man shown to have been inhumanized to Beast and Bird through Society —which shall rebuke fanaticism for its ignorance of natural laws, while it shall plead against wantonness with our race for reconciliation and for mercy to the humblest of Go's 3 4 INTRODUCTION. creatures ;—in a word, which shall endeavor always, and in every country, to present the Human Actor with the natural scene—the hunter with the hunted—and the Hunter-Natural- ist, placed amidst his chosen accessories, however remotg, whether of climate, individual action and adventure, or the living and characteristic objects of his pursuit. . And who is this Hunter-Naturalist? I answer, something of the Primitive Hunter and modern Field-Naturalist com- bined. The name best defines itself—since Hunter-Naturalist implies at once a rugged and freebooter intrusion into the realms of Nature, in which the nice mail of Science has ex- changed its glitter and its polish for the greasy, powder-black- ened, blood-stained buckskins of the rough, earnest wilderness. While pretending to no dainty refinements of technical accuracy, if his clear eye, aided by his stout limbs, explores, discovers and assists to glorify, through art and thought, the wide fields of Natural Science, I see no good reason why his pale Brother of the Closet should sneer at him if he forgets his Latin in a “‘ stampede,” or spells the jaw-cracking name of a genus wrong, when his notes are often written, as much py the flashes of the covering storm, or the smouldering light of a half-drowned fire, as by honest sun light, Familiar with Nature in all her modes and moods, the Hunter-Naturalist is he who being accustomed to know her through the medium of his own senses rather than books, should only be held responsible, in a scientific sense, for what he him- self has felt, seen, tasted, smelt, heard, and thought, out in unchallenged communion with the secrets of his great Mother. His observations then are essentially his own. They but constitute one man’s impressions of Nature, and convey an individual method of expressing them, which may be as reliable in the facts presented,—to say the least of it, —as if they had been drained, diluted, altered and amended through the musty pages of an hundred folios. Not that I would presume by any means to arrogate for INTRODUCTION. i the Hunter-Naturalist, even under my own comprehensive definition of his mission, any independence of his pale Brother, so far as his relations to absolute science are con- cerned. His individual observations would soon become, to the stern accuracy of practical classification, more crude than savage myths; and his deductions vaguer than the shadows of a day-dream—but that when submitted to this colder, more learned, and deliberate analysis, his “ facts’ and his “‘ discoveries” have been inexorably technicalized. Yet from my earliest childhood I have felt individually wronged when constantly compelled to turn from the dry, inert and formal methods of “the Books,” to the gay, sug- gestive or subtile treatment of the Goldsmiths, Huberts and St. Pierres, who have spoken so successfully for the People, the charmed “ sesame’’ of Science—or else in hopeless sense of the comparatively narrowed artificialities of each, have thrown myself back, with a calmed and steadied enthusiasm, upon the devouter study of those green and living pages of the Natural World, which have never yet failed me in their truth. Thus in assuming my position with regard to the method of treating the subjects of Natural History, to be observed in this work, the whole matter has resolved itself with me into the simple question whether “lion-heart” and “eagle-eye”’ shall be banished from heroic poetry, because they lack the learned prefixes of Aguille and Leonis—or sentimental rhymes resign all images of “plaintive Philomels,” “ cooing Doves,” and “Gazelle eyes,”’ because they are not defined to the people according to the “dead letter” of Museum cata- logues?—or, indeed, whether it be vitally essential to the general purposes of human enlightenment, that “all the world” should become strictly technical Naturalists, in the scientific sense, before the many who possess an eye for the Beautiful, an ear for its language, a spiritual recognition of its unities, and heart for the joy it brings, can be admitted to its presence? It is thus the feeling has continued to grow with my growth, and strengthen with my strength, that the Literature 6 INTRODUCTION. of Natura] History has been too much circumscribed within the mere formulas of Scientific utility to meet the mental requisitions of the period in its text, or the practical demand for cheapness in its illustration, which the rapid progress of discoyery in this department clearly demands! I have, therefore, i in bringing this enterprise to a head, consistently acted with an early conceived purpose, that so far as the devotion of individual energies could go, the General Mind should no longer be thus rudely shut off from the contempla- tion of themes which, in their free and legitimate presenta- tion, are the most healthful, refreshing and ennobling! I speak this in no arrogance, for of such I have no sense—but of a collected purpose.