MONTANA STAlt LIBHAH1 3 0864 0010 3990 1 EFFECTS OF GRAZING ON ARABIS FECUNDA 1996 Progress Report Peter Lesica 929 Locust Missoula, MT 59802 STATE DOCUMENTS COLLECTION 1998 MONTANA STATE LIBRARY u_ 1515 E. 6th AVE. HELENA, MONTANA 53S20 In cooperation with Montana Natural Heritage Program 15 15 East Sixth Avenue Helena, MT 59620-1800 For: Bureau of Land Management P.O. Box 3388 Butte, MT 59702-3388 Task Order 1422E070P60063 December 1996 This report should be cited as follows: Lesica, P. 1996. Effects of grazing on Arabis fecunda - 1996 progress report to Bureau of Land Management. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena. 5 pp plus appendices lllV" ill II II III III III 3 0864 0010 3990 1 EFFECTS OF GRAZING ON ARABIS FECUND A 1996 Progress Report STATE DOCUMENTS COLLECTION I998 MONTANA STATE LIERARY Peter Lesica m£*?&m%$%620 929 Locust Missoula, MT 59802 In cooperation with Montana Natural. Heritage Program 15 15 East Sixth Avenue Helena. MT 59620-1 SOO For: Bureau of Land Management P.O. Box 3388 Butte, MT 59702-3388 / Task Order 1422E070P60063 December 1996 This report should be cited as follows: Lesica, P. 1996. Effects of grazing on Arabis fecunda - 1996 progress report to Bureau of Land Management. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena. 5 pp plus appendices INTRODUCTION Arabis fecunda Rollins is a rosette-forming perennial in the Mustard Family (Brassicaceae). This recently described species (Rollins 1984) is endemic to highly calcareous, azonal soils in the foothills of the Sapphire Range in Ravalli County and in the Pioneer and Highland ranges of Beaverhead and Silver Bow counties, Montana (Lesica 1993). Arabis fecunda generally occurs on steep, often eroding slopes with low vascular plant density. Arabis fecunda is considered threatened in Montana (Lesica and Shelly 1991) and is listed as a sensitive species by the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. Most sites at which Arabis fecunda occurs are grazed by livestock, but little is actually known about the effects of livestock grazing on this rare species. Studies have shown that A. fecunda is more common on soil occupied by cryptogamic soil crust (Lesica and Shelly 1992). These crusts are easily disturbed by livestock grazing; consequently, grazing may reduce A. fecunda populations at these sites (Lesica and Shelly 1992). Furthermore, A. fecunda often occurs on steep slopes with unstable soil. Trampling by livestock could reduce the number of A. fecunda plants on these slopes. On the other hand, A. fecunda seems to require open soil for seedling establishment (Lesica and Shelly 1996) and may be facilitated by disturbance associated with grazing at some sites. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of livestock grazing on populations of Arabis fecunda. on the north side of the Pioneer Range. STUDY SITES Quartz Hill: From Dewey travel west on Hwy 43 ca. 0.3 miles and then turn south on gravel road (Beaverhead Forest Road #187). Proceed ca. 1 mile up the road. Exclosure is on a steep hillside west of the road (T1S R10W S8 NW1/4 of SE1/4). Aspect: 95°, Slope: 40° Elevation: 5,900 ft. Thompson's Corner: From Dewey, travel west on Hwy 43 ca. 3.2 miles and then turn north on gravel road (Beaverhead National Forest Road #83). Continue ca. 0.2 miles and turn east on a small dirt road along the north side of the Big Hole River. Continue ca. 2 miles. Site is on the north side of the road on the west side of a small draw. T1S R10W S5 NW1/4 of NW1/4. Aspect: 100°, Slope: 20°, Elevation: 5,600 ft. Dewev Cemetery: From Dewey travel west on Hwy 43 ca. 0.3 miles and then turn south on gravel road (Beaverhead Forest Road #187). Proceed ca. 0.5 mile up the road to just past the cemetery. Pull in on the small two-track going east just past the cemetery. Site is on the hill to the south. Aspect: ca. 220°, Slope: 30° Elevation: 5,800 ft. METHODS Field Methods The Quartz Hill and Thompson's Corner exclosures were established in 1991, while the Dewey Cemetery exclosure was established in 1993. Measurements were made at the three sites on the following dates: Quartz Hill- 1 1 Jun 1 99 1 , 7 Jun 1 993 Thompson's Corner- 11 Jun 1991, 7 Jun 1993, 17 Jun 1996 Dewey Cemetery- 7 Jun 1993, 17 Jun 1996. The Quartz Hill site was destroyed by vandals in 1995 or early 1996, before measurements could be taken a third time. There is one exclosure plot and one control plot at each site. Each exclosure plot is 6 ft X 6 ft, marked at the four corners by metal stakes and completely covered by firm wire mesh. Control plots are placed near by the exclosure and are identical except they are uncovered. Each plot is divided into four equal subplots (3 X 3 ft) to facilitate counting. In each subplot estimate the basal cover of rock, moss-lichen, bare ground and vegetation, and estimate the canopy cover of grass, forbs and shrubs to the nearest 5%. In each subplot count the number of Arabis fecunda plants in each of three size classes: Seedling (S):single rosette smaller that a penny Rosette (R): single rosette larger than a penny or multiple rosettes Fruiting (F):plants with flowers or fruits Data Analysis Changes in basal or vegetation cover between exclosure and control plots can be assessed by visual examination of the summary tables. There are no replicates of the treatments at any of the sites; thus, statistical tests based on parametric distributions (e.g. t-test, analysis of variance) cannot be used. It is necessary to use counts (frequency) and contingency table analysis. The ratio of Arabis fecunda plants in treatment to control plots in year t can be compared to that in year t+a with a chi-square test. This test assumes that the observations are independent; i.e., the plants counted in year t+a cannot be the same as those counted in year t. Demographic monitoring studies from low- elevation sites indicate that ca. 65% of cohorts have died after three years (Lesica and Shelly 1995). Thus, the test cannot be considered valid unless comparing counts taken at least three years apart. Number of plants in each of the three size classes can also be compared using the same test. RESULTS Changes in vegetation Canopy cover of grass has increased in all the exclosure plots since the start of the study but not in control plots (Table 1). Other changes are small and inconsistent and likely due to recording error. Arabis fecunda density Only the 1991-96 and 1993-96 intervals can be tested for statistical significance. The 1991-93 interval is too short because well over 50% of plants alive in 1993 were probably also alive in 1991 (Lesica and Shelly 1995). At Thompson Corner density of A. fecunda increased in exclosure plots but not in control plots in 1991-96 and the difference was significant for reproductives and total density (Fig. 2). The difference between exclosure and control plots was greater in 1993 than in 1996. At Dewey Cemetery density of A. fecunda increased in both exclosure and control plots in 1993-96, but the increase was significantly more pronounced in the exclosure for rosettes and total density (Fig. 2). At Quartz Hill density of A. fecunda was higher in the exclosure in 1991, but higher in the control in 1993. Unfortunately the significance of these changes cannot be tested statistically. DISCUSSION In the first years of the study density of A. fecunda became significantly greater in the exclosures at both Thompson Corner and Dewey Cemetery, and most of this difference was due to increases in the number of rosettes, indicating enhanced recruitment following cessation of grazing. At Thompson Corner, the only site with three recording periods, the difference between exclosure and control plots remained relatively stable between 1993 and 1996. On the other hand, density of A. fecunda appeared to decrease in the exclosure plot relative to the control at Quartz Hill. The reason(s) for this difference in response among the three sites is not known. These results suggest that grazing or trampling have an adverse effect on A. fecunda populations at some but not all sites. Grass cover increased in the exclosures at all sites as expected, suggesting that livestock do use these areas. However, mule deer are also present, and there is no W way to ascertain whether the positive effect of the exclosures on A. fecunda was due to exclusion of cattle or deer or both. Experimental plots at Thompson Corner and Dewey Cemetery should be vi sited again in 1999 to determine if the positive effect of the exclosures on A. fecunda continue to be manifest. LITERATURE CITED Lesica, P. 1993. Report on the conservation status of Arabisfecunda, a candidate threatened species. Unpublished report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Sendee. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. Lesica, P. and J. S. Shelly. 1991. Endangered, threatened and sensitive vascular plants of Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Occasional Publication No. 1, Helena, Montana, USA. Lesica, P. and J. S. Shelly. 1992. The effects of cryptogamic soil crust on the population dynamics of Arabisfecunda (Brassicaceae). American Midland Naturalist 128: 53-60. Lesica, P. and J. S. Shelly. 1995. Effects of Reproductive Mode on Demography and Life History in Arabisfecunda (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 752-762. Lesica, P. and J. S. Shelly. 1996. Competitive effects oiCentaurea maculosa on the population dynamics of Arabisfecunda. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 123: 111-121. Rollins, R. C. 1984. Studies in the Cruciferae of western North America II. Contributions to the Gray Herbarium 214: 1-18. Table 1 . Basal and canopy cover of ground and vegetation in exclosure and control plots at three study sites. Litter cover is combined with bare ground. Quartz Hi Rock Bare Ground Moss/lichen Basal Veg. Grass Forbs Shrubs Rock Bare Ground Moss/lichen Basal Veg. Grass Forbs Shrubs Rock Bare Ground Moss/lichen Basal Veg. Grass Forbs Shrubs Exclosure Control 1991 1993 1996 1991 1993 1996 0 13 .. 0 10 .. - 73 -- 83 -- - 2 -- -- 1 - 14 - -- 8 -- 0 19 - 4 8 -- 3 25 4 14 -- 2 8 Thompson': 3 ; Comer 1 Exclosure Control 1991 1993 1996 1991 1993 1996 48 50 34 34 36 20 .. 31 18 - 53 60 - 4 3 3 <1 - 15 18 - 9 14 9 45 63 8 11 11 8 26 10 8 23 14 0 0 0 2 2 2 Dewey Cemetery Exclosure Control 1991 1993 1996 1991 1993 1996 41 16 „ 38 29 54 68 - 58 64 1 2 - 1 <1 .. 5 8 - 5 4 10 23 - 5 8 .. 5 18 - 5 8 - 0 0 -- 0 0 Table 1. Basal and canopy cover of ground and vegetation in exclosure and control plots at three study sites. Litter cover is combined with bare ground. Que trtz Hill Exclosure Control 1991 1993 1996 1991 1993 1996 Rock 0 13 — 0 10 — Bare Ground — 73 — -- 83 -- Moss/lichen -- 2 -- -- 1 -- Basal Veg. — 14 — -- 8 -- Grass 0 19 -- 4 8 -- Forbs 3 25 — 4 14 — Shrubs 2 8 — 3 1 — ThomDson's Corner Exclosure Control 1991 1993 1996 1991 1993 1996 Rock 48 50 34 34 36 20 Bare Ground — 31 18 -- 53 60 Moss/lichen — 4 3 -- 3 <1 Basal Veg. — 15 18 -- 9 14 Grass 9 45 63 8 11 '11 Forbs 8 26 10 8 23 14 Shrubs 0 0 0 2 2 2 Dewey Cemetery- Rock Bare Ground Moss/lichen Basal Veg. Grass Forbs Shrubs Exclosure Control 1993 1996 1991 1993 1996 41 16 — 38 29 54 68 — 58 64 1 2 -- 1 <1 5 8 — 5 4 10 23 -- 5 8 5 18 — 5 8 0 0 — 0 0 Figure 1. Photographs of the Quartz Hill site and exclosure taken in June, 1996. n Fiqure 2. Density of Arabis fecunda in exclosure and control plots at three sites in 1991-96. Statistical significance determined by chi-square tests *P<0.05, *** P<0.001. Dewey Cemetary Rosette c a JUU 250 _ "o 200 150 0 - - • / - CD E 100 50 0 • i.i i 91 93 96 Thompson Corner , Rosette o 80 Q. 60 - /s - n / ° 40 - / CD -O 20 - /---. - 3 0 I I I 91 93 96 Quartz Hill 91 93 96 Reproductive o Exclosure • Control Total 91 93 96 Year Reproductive 400 *** _ 300 f ~ 200 1 ~ 100 0 r i i i 91 93 96 Total Reproductive 91 93 96 Total 91 93 96 MONTANA STATE This "cover" page added by the Internet Archive for formatting purposes