SERIES FIEST BO; KS OF NATUKAL HT* ELEMENTS OF MAMMALOGY TIiE USE OF S AND COLLEGES, BY W. S. W. RUSCHENBt 'GER, M.D. FROM THE TEXT OF MILNE EDWARDS, AND ACHILLE COMTE TORY IN THE COLLECrES .'HARLEMAGNE. PL ATJE S, >ELPH ELLIOT, NORTi TH STREE IS •• THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESENTED BY PROF. CHARLES A. KOFOID AND MRS. PRUDENCE W. KOFOID •«* BIG-ELK. — CHIEF OP THE OMAWHAWS. ( Type -of the American Race.) RUSCHENBERGER'S SERIES. FIKST BOOKS OF NATURAL HISTORY. ELEMENTS OF MAMMALOGY: PREPARED FOR THE USE OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES, BY W. S. W. RUSCHENBERGER, M.D. Surgeon in the U. S. Navy; Fellow of the College of Physicians; Hon. Member of the Philadelphia Medical Society ; Member of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, &o. &c. FROM THE TEXT OF MILNE EDWARDS, AND ACHILLE COMTE, PROFESSORS OF NATURAL HISTORY IN THE COLLEGES OF HENRI IV, AND CHARLEMAGNE. WITH PLATES. PHILADELPHIA: GRIGG & ELLIOT, NO. 9 NORTH FOURTH STREET. 1845. Entered, according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1842, by W. S. W. RUSCHENBERGER, M.D., in the clerk's office of the District Court of the United States in and tor the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. T. K. AND P. Q. COLLINS, PRINTERS. (4) TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE. The " First Book of Natural History," has been received with so much favour, as to induce me to prepare the second of the series, which embraces the study of mammiferous animals. Although, like " Physiology and Ani- mal Mechanism," this is a Primer, or First-Book, I have named it, " Second Book of Natural History," with the view of designating the series numeri- cally, and thereby obviating confusion on this point. As in many instances, the same animal is known by different common names in different places, (the Rock-Jish of Philadelphia, for example, is a Striped-Bass, at Boston), I have added the systematic names, which are generally derived from the Greek or other languages, and presented in a Latin dress. To facilitate the labours of the student, all these names have been given in a glossary with their respective definitions, and etymologies The Greek words have been printed in italics, and where it occurs, the omega has been designated by a mark over the o, thus ; (d.) It is be- lieved that a knowledge of the etymology of systematic names materially assists the student in understanding and recollecting the things they desig- nate : it is therefore respectfully suggested, that teachers should require their pupils, when reciting their lessons, to explain all the uncommon words con- tained in it, or even commit the whole glossary to memory in successive lessons. It is not designed that the questions at the foot of the page shall be an- swered by repeating the text from memory ; but the pupil should be able to give the facts in his own language, and show he understands the subject. The plates were engraved by Mr. G. Thomas, (No. 37 South Third Street, Philadelphia.) The frontispiece is a faithful copy, though reduced in size, of a portrait of Ongpatonga, (Big Elk,) Chief of the Omawhaws, drawn for Morton's Crania Americana, by M. S. Weaver, from the original painting by J. Neagle. For a lithographic copy of this drawing, I am indebted to my friend, Professor S. G. Morton. In preparing this little volume I have endeavored to avoid errors, and I should be very glad to feel sure that I have been successful in my attempt ; and though men of greater information may detect faults, I still hope the book may be found adequate to its object. I beg critics to bear in mind that it is merely a Primer, and not presented as a perfect system of Mammalogy for the use of naturalists. It is designed solely to facilitate the primary studies of those who desire to become acquainted with that branch of natural history, which treats of mammiferous animals. PHILADELPHIA, December , 1841. TO TEACHERS AND STUDENTS. There is no royal or privileged road to knowledge. For the prince and the peasant, the rich and the poor, there is one common way alone, and it leads up a laborious steep. And though there be on this republican pathway, many a flower, and many a sweet resting place, all who enter upon it are doomed to incessant toil : for, those who loiter on the way side, instead of reaching the temple, fall behind and are lost to those who began the journey with them. There is no easy method of acquiring knowledge. It is only to be ob- tained by close attention and unceasing labour. No matter what may be the quality of his faculties, the brilliance of his talents, to become usefully learned in any branch of human knowledge, every man must toil and take advantage of all the means within his reach. It has been asserted that, to become familiar with any branch of physical science, it is only necessary to see with the eyes and hear with the ears, without resorting to other means. It is contended, for example, that Natural History is best studied without " the use of any books whatever, except the book of nature and its visible illustrations." This notion is entertained by persons of so much learning and influence that it is worth our time to in- quire briefly, whether the plan has pretensions that should lead to its general adoption. He who reads only and draws all his knowledge from books, may perhaps become very learned, a skilful rhetorician, a formidable critic, the author of brilliant theories, the inventor of some ingenious system, but he will never, by this means alone, be able to praciice usefully, what he has thus learned, and in most instances, it will be found, that instead of having acquired ideas of practical application, the memory has been filled only with words. The student who is content to follow lectures, will not be more successful. One learns less in this way than by reading good authors. By reading, we may comprehend the thoughts and opinions of an author, without making him say, or attributing to him the reverse of wh.it he has written or wished to express. If there is any uncertainty as to having rightly under, stood the text, before confiding it to the memory, we have it in our power to review those passages which seem to us, either obscure or extravagant; the TO TEACHERS AND STUDENTS. v book is still there, opening its leaves to whomsoever would consult it again, patiently submitting to all kinds of questions that may bethought necessary to propound. But the lecture is fugitive and instantaneous. In reading, on the contrary, nothing hinders comparison, or prevents the judgment, from being exercised almost at the same time with the memory; for we have here, immoveable under our eyes, the expressions of the author. In a lecture, of all the faculties of the mind, scarcely any other than that of memory is in active play, for, it is absolutely necessary, first to catch the words of the professor ; and then, how is one to be certain that he has not misunderstood what he believed he heard ? A word, a phrase, which escape?, a parenthesis badly placed in the discourse, a second of inattention, are enough to lead the auditor into gross mistakes. To what individual has it not happened, in a simple conversation, to be under the necessity, before clearly comprehending to require the repetition of the same thing once or even oflener by his in- terlocutor 1 How then is it possible not to be mistaken in simply listening to a lecture, in which all cannot be clear, where the thoughts and phrases succeed each other with such rapidity, where the words require, as it were, to be seized upon at the moment of utterance and placed in reserve, by the memory, and not to be submitted, until after a lapse of time, by the pupil, to all the intel- lectual operations necessary for judgment or deduction of opinion. If it is sometimes difficult and even impossible for grave and intelligent men to agree upon the sense which it is proper to attribute to the written phrases of an author, that are under their eyes, how can you expect students to be more successful when they acton words which have passed them, scarcely striking upon their ears? Who has not witnessed amongst young people, between fellow students, disputes about what the professor has said, or has not said, upon what was, or was not the opinion of this one or that, although all of them may have listened to the lecture which gave rise to the dispute 7 How many errors have been propagated in this way; what baseless controversies have thus arisen ; how many men have, in this manner, been even brought to hate each other ! He who listens to a lecture without reading afterwards, may be compared to a painter who, having fixed his eye upon a passing object, retires to draw its portrait without having the original before him. There is nothing in this, however, which argues against oral teaching. This mode of instruction has the advantage of bringing forward strong images, of keeping the attention awake, of rendering descriptions more clear, if not more correct than those given in books, by mingling gesture with vocal intonation. In a lecture, the professor can watch the eyes of his audi- tors, and pass at once that which a word has sufficed to render intelligible or repeat the same thing when he perceives it was not at first under- vi TO STUDENTS AND TEACHERS. stood. Writings carry with them only to a small extent this sort of license i in a lecture the eye and ear work together. — The eye is the only sense that acts in reading ; the memory retains more readily what it receives from oral lessons than what it gets by simple reading. In listening, the impres- sions are more numerous, more vivid, more agreeable, more natural perhaps , but they are less complete, less exact, less pure, less clear than those received from reading : therefore, if one is wrong in listening without reading, he would be equally wrong to read and not listen. These two modes of in- struction mutually assist each other, and are not reciprocally exclusive. If you would profit by them, listen, and retain as much as you can, and then study the subject in those books that treat it best. By reading, you rectify the errors of the ear, and listening clears up what may have been obscuro in reading. If you would clearly understand what you hear, read before or after, or both before and after the lecture what has been published about its subject. No one would expect to become a poet or tragedian by simply listening to recitations or witnessing the representations at a theatre. Nor could any one acquire the information necessary to be a painter, by simply walking- through galleries of pictures. He must resort to books and study their con- tents with care and attention. In all times, and in all places, all men have felt the necessity of going from spoken to written language. Formerly, pupils drew the lessons of their masters on the leaves of trees, to meditate on them afterwards at leisure. Professors now, very generally, have their respective courses printed, that the student may have the text always at hand for reference and study. An individual entering a city for the first time, will make less progress and become less perfectly acquainted with it, if he depend altogether upon his own observation and verbal directions, than one who joins to these means of information, guide books and maps. To become acquainted with anatomy l»y merely listening to lectures, or by reading only, or by dissecting alone, unaided either by oral lessons or books, would be the labour of a life time, even if it be possible at all ; but by joining all these means, by listening to lectures, by reading, and by dissection, he will lessen the labour, abbreviate the time to a few years at most, and attain a perfect and exact knowledge of the science. To read, to see, to hear, to study, to observe, and to listen are not too many means of acquiring solid information of any physical subject. Who- ever confines himself to one of these means alone, to the exclusion of all the rest, will never acquire complete knowledge of any physical science. To study natural history then with entire success, the student should listen to lectures, read and study in books, visit museums and collections ; and in order to join the observation of material things with reading and lectures, TO TEACHERS AND STUDENTS. vii every school, if possible, should be furnished with a museum of instruction, that is, a collection containing the types of all the genera, that the student may have the opportuity of comparing them with their oral and written de- scriptions. In this way only can one become a thorough naturalist. Though this is not the object of every one, still all should possess sufficient know- ledge of the subject, to understand the principles upon which the objects of nature are arranged for the purpose of convenient and advantageous study. If the reader of these observations will reflect upon them, and decide for himself upon their general truth, he will not think it expedient or profitable to withhold books even from those students of physical science who have ^he opportunity of listening to the most accomplished lecturers, nor will he, I think, be of opinion, that Natural History can be best taught, and to " begin- ners especially," " without the use of any book, whatever, except the book of nature and its visible illustrations." MAMMALOGY. CONTENTS. LESSON I. Classification of the Animal Kingdom. — Comparison of Animals. — Their Division into four Branches. — Characters of each of these Branches. — Division of the Vertebrata into four Classes. • LESSON II. Mammalia. — Peculiarities of the organization of animals of this Class. — Division into Orders. LESSON III. Order of Bimana. — The only Species, Man. — Anatomical characters which distinguish the body of man from that of the other Mammalia. — Hands — Feet — Station — Brain — Human Races. LESSON IV. Order of Quadrumana. — Zoological Characters. — Peculiarities of their organization compared to their habits. — Division into three families ; their Zoological characters. Family of Monkeys. — Division into Monkeys of the old and new Continent.— Description and habits of the principal genera, (Ourangs, Gibbons, Guenons, Magots, Cynocephalus. — Howling Monkey.) Family of Ouistitis. — Manners. Family of Makis. — Description and habits. LESSON V. Order of Carnaria. — Zoological characters. — Peculiarities of their organi- zation.— Division into families, — Family of Cheiroptera. — Zoological characters. — Tribe of Bats —Peculiarities of Organization. — Habits. — Frugivorous Bats (example, the Roussette). — Insectivorous Bats (exam- ple, Vespertilio, Oreillard). — Tribe of Galeopithecus. Family of Insectivora. — Zoological characters. — Organization and habits of the Hedgehog, the Shrew, and the Mole. LESSON VI. Family of the Carnivora. — Zoological characters. — Peculiarities of organi- zation — Division into three tribes. Tribe of Plantigrada.— Zoological characters. — Organization and habits of Bears (Brown Bear, White Bear, Black Bear). — Badgers. — Use of their hair. Tribe of Digitigrada. — Zoological characters — Group of vermiform digiti- grades. — History of the Polecats — (Common Polecat, Ferret, Weasel, Ermine). — The Martens — (Common Marten, Beech Marten, Sable). — The Otters, (Common Otter, Sea Otter). — Genus of Dogs.— History and habits of some races, (Wolves, Foxes). — Genus of Civets (Civet, Common Wildcat, Mangouste of Egypt) — Genus of Hyenas. — Genus of Cats. — Habits (Lion, Tiger, Leopard, Couguar, Lynx, Cat.) Tribe of Amphibia. — Zoological characters. — Habits (The Seal, the Morse.) Order of Marsupialia. — Zoological characters. — Peculiarities of organiza- tion.—Habits (Opossums, Phalangers, Kangaroos). * MAMMALOGY. LESSON VII. Order of Rodentia. — Zoological characters. — Peculiarities of their organiza tion. — Organization and habits of the" genus Squirrel. — Squirrels pro- perly so called, (Common Squirrel, Flying Squirrel). — Organization and habits of the genus Rat. — Marmots. — Habits. — Hibernation.— Dormouse. — Rats properly so called, (Mouse, Rat). — Hamsters. — Field- mice. — Jerboa. — Genus of Castors. — Organization and habits of Cas- tors properly so called. — Genus of Porcupines — Organization and habits of Porcupines properly so called. — Genus Hare. — Organization and habits of Hares properly so called, (Common Hare, Rabbit). —Genus of Guinea-pigs— Chinchilla. — General remarks on peltries. — The use of hair in the manufacture of Felt — Glue. LESSON VIII. Order of Edentata. — Zoological characters. — Division into three families. Family of Tardigrada. — Organization. — Habits (AY or Sloth.) Family of Ordinary Edentata (Armadillos, Ant-eaters, Manis.) Family of Monotremata. — Peculiarities of their organization (Ornitho- rynchus, Echidna.) Order of Pachydermata — Zoological characters. — Peculiarities of their organization. — Division into three families. Family of Proboscidiana. — Genus Elephant. — Organization. — Habits. — Use, — Ivory, (Elephants of Asia, Africa, and Siberia.) LESSON IX. Family of Pachydermata Ordinaria. — Genus Hippopotamus. — Genus Hog (Wild Hog, Domestic Hog). — Genus Rhinoceros. Family of Solipedes. — Horse. — Habits. — Signs of the age of Horses. — Principal Races. — Ass. — Zebra. — Couagga. — Onagga. LESSON X. Order of Ruminantia. — Zoological characters. — Peculiarities of their organi- zation.— Rumination . Ruminants without Horns. — Genus of Camels. — Camels properly so called.— Peculiarities of organization. — Habits and uses, (Camel with one hump, Camel with two humps). — Lamas, Guanaco, Vicunia). — Genus of Musks. Ruminants with Horns. — Genus of Stags — Deer — Habits, (Fallow-Deer, Common Stag, Roebuck, Rein-Deer, Elk) — Genus of Giraffes. — Genus of Antelopes (Gazelle, Chamois).— Genus of Goats, (Wild Goats, Bouquetin or Ibex, Domestic Gout.) LESSON XI. Genus of Sheep, (Argali, Mouflon, Domestic Sheep). — Wool. — Merinos.— Genus of the Ox (Common Ox, Auroch, Buffalo, Bison, Yack).— Use of Oxen— Milk— Butter— Cheese— Leather. Order of Cetacea. — Zoological characters. — Peculiarities of organization.— Habits — Division into two families. — Herbivorous Cetacea. — Manati. — Common Cetacea. — Apparatus of the Blowers. — Genus of Dolphins, (Dolphin, Porpoise) — Genus of Narwhals. — Genus of Cachalots. — Organization. — Habits — Spermaceti. — Genus of Whales. — Organiza- tion and Habits.— Whalebone.— Fat.— Uses.— Whale-fishing. MAMMALOGY: THE NATURAL HISTORY OF MAMMIFEROUS ANIMALS. LESSON I. CLASSIFICATION OF THE ANIMAL KINGDOM — Comparison of Ani- mals— Their division into four BRANCHES — Characters of each of these Branches — Division of the VERTEBRATA into four Classes. OF CLASSIFICATION IN GENERAL. As we have seen, when considering the subject of "Physiology and Animal Mechanism," The Natural History of Animals is termed Zoology. For the convenience of study, Zoology has been divided into several branches, the highest of which is termed Mammalogy. This embraces the study of the Natural History of all Mam- imiferous Animals, man included, and is to engage our attention at present. 1. The number of different animals inhabiting the surface of the globe, is so great, that in order to study them with ease, it is necessary to establish amongst them, divisions, and sub-divisions. Each of the groups thus formed should be characterised in such a manner as to enable us always to recognise, with certainty, the individuals which belong to it, and the group should be designated by a particular name. The assemblage of these divisions and sub-divisions constitutes what is termed a CLASSIFICATION. 2. In the classification of animals, the name Species is applied to an assemblage of individuals which bear a strong resemblance to each other, and which are perpetuated with the same essential qualities. Thus, man, the dog, the horse constitute, to the eye of the zoologist, so many distinct species. 3. Sometimes one species differs considerably from all the others ; but, in general, there is a number of them, greater or less, which very much resemble each other, being distinguished only by some unimportant differences ; the horse and the ass, the 1. What must be done to enable us to study the animal kingdom with ease? What is meant by a classification? 2. What is the meaning of the term species? 2 12 OF CLASSIFICATION IN GENERAL. dog and the wolf, are examples. In the natural classifications, the species which resemble each other, we unite into groups, called genera, and add to their peculiar or specific name a generic name which is common to them : thus, we say, to desig- nate the different species of bears, URSUS arctos, (the brown bear of Europe); URSUS Americanus, (the North American black bear); URSUS maritimus, (the polar bear, &c.); and LACERTA agilis, LACERTA ocellata, LACERTA viridis, &c., to designate the various species of the genus LACERTA or lizard. 4. Each animal has, as is seen above, two names, which may be compared to the family and baptismal names of men, with the difference that they are inverted in the order in which they are placed ; the name of the genus always precedes the name of the species. 5. Those genera which resemble each other most, are united into TRIBES, and the tribes into FAMILIES. 6. The families are distributed on the same principle, into groups, of a higher rank to which the name of ORDER is applied. 7. Finally, the orders are, in turn, united into CLASSES, and the classes themselves are the divisions of the great BRANCHES of which the animal kingdom is composed. 8. Thus, to class the various animals, the animal kingdom is divided into Branches; the branches into Classes; the classes into Orders; the orders into Families ; the families into Tribes; the tribes into Genera ; the genera into Species, which designate assemblages of individuals. The following table shows still better the manner in which the animal kingdom is divided into groups, which in turn are sub-di- vided farther and farther, until all the individuals belonging to the different species are separated from each other. " 3. What is meant by the term genera 1 4. What is the number of names given to each animal ? What is the character of these two names ? Is the generic or specific name placed first ih order? 5. What constitutes a tribe? What is included in the term family ? 6 How is the term order applied ? 7. When several orders are united together, what do they constitute ? What do the classes form? 8. To enable us to study it with greater facility, how is the animal king- dom divided ? 14 CLASSIFICATION. 9. Each one of these divisions and sub-divisions of the animal kingdom has a particular name. For example; — one of the branches is called the branch of the vertebrata, (or vertebrated animals,) another the branch of the molluscous animals, or mollusca, &c.; the first of these branches is divided into many classes, one of which is known as the class of birds, another as the class of reptiles, &j"c. 10. To enable the naturalist to know whether the animal which he studies, belongs to this or that branch or family, &c., it is necessary that each of the divisions and sub-divisions, under consideration, should be established by characters, easily recog- nised, and derived from the conformation of the animals themselves. 1 1. Therefore, each branch, each class, each family &c., should comprise all animals which possess certain peculiarities of organi- zation which are not found in animals belonging to other branches or other divisions. The BRANCH of VERTEBRATED ANIMALS, for example, comprises every animal whose body is sustained by an internal skeleton; the CLASS OF FISHES comprises all vertebrated animals which, in place of lungs, have branchiae. To know whether an animal belongs to the branch of vertebrata, it is suffi- cient to examine whether it has an internal skeleton, and this character once ascertained, it cannot possibly be confounded with any animal belonging to the other branches. To know whether a vertebrated animal belongs to the class of fishes or to another class, we must ascertain whether it be provided with branchiae or lungs. 12. [To illustrate the utility of classification, a few examples will suffice: if one would, without resorting to some such means, ascertain the name of an animal that he had killed in the chase, it would be necessary to compare it with a detailed description of all other animals ; for if, even when at the very beginning of this inquiry, we should meet with a description which seemed to correspond to the object in question, we could not be sure, until we had run over all the other descriptions, that we should not find one still more exactly applicable to this being ; the labor would be consequently almost interminable. But if we employ 9. How are the divisions and sub-divisions of ihe animal kingdom designa- ted ? What are the examples ? 10. By what means is a naturalist enabled to know whether an animal belongs to this or that branch, or family ? 11. What is the distinguishing character of those animals which belong to the branch of vertebrated animals? What is the distinguishing character- istic of fishes ? How do you recognise an animal that belongs to the branch of the vertebrata ? How do we know whether a vertebrated animal belongs to the class of fishes ? 12. Give an illustration of the utility of classification ? CLASSIFICATION, 15 the method of classification, we shall arrive almost at once, and without difficulty, at the end of our search. I will suppose that the animal in question is an eagle ; I find at first that it has a skeleton, and hence I know that it belongs to the branch of ver- tebrala^ and it is not necessary to compare it with animals of the other branches ; I next look for the characters which distinguish the different classes of vertebrata from each other, and when it is determined in this way, that it is an animal of the class of birds, I exclude from the comparison which remains yet to be made, all the mammalia, all the reptiles, and all the fishes; I next inquire whether it presents the characters proper to this or that order of the class of birds, this or that family ; and when I have ascer- tained the genus to which it belongs I have only to compare it with a very small number of animals from which it differs only in some few, not very important particulars.] 1 3. [The use of classification permits the abbreviation, to a con- siderable extent, of the description otherwise necessary to make another recognise any particular animal ; for if we say that an animal is a vertebrata of the class of reptiles, of the order of sauria, of the family of crocodiles, it requiresj in order to dis- tinguish it, only to point out the characters by which it differs from a very small number of other animals, which possess, in common with it, characters peculiar to the order and family of which it also forms a part. There exists here the same difference as would be found in seeking, by his description and number, a soldier in an army in which all the ranks were mingled, or in a well-regulated army where each division, each brigade, each regiment, each battalion, each company, would be found in the place belonging to them, and carrying with them their distinctive signs.] 14. [By the assistance of zoological classification we are enabled to assign to an animal the name which belongs to it, in the same manner as we are enabled to find a person we seek by knowing the direction of his residence ; in the latter case we first inquire his country, then the state, the county, the town, the street, the house, and finally the room in which he dwells ; and in the first case we ask to what grand division of the animal kingdom does the species under consideration belong, then to what class, what order, what family, and to what genus it must be assigned ; these questions being solved the work is almost finished.] 15. As we have seen, it is by the differences existing between 13. What is the striking use of classification? Illustrate its use? 14. What does zoological classification enable us to do ? 15. By what means are we able to classify animals ? On what principle 16 THE GREAT DIVISIONS OF THE ANIMAL KINGDOM. animals that we are enabled to classify them, and to distinguish them with certainty ; but in order that a classification may be as useful as possible, it must serve to point out the resemblances, greater or less, which are remarked amongst them. Also, in the classifications called the natural methods or orders, the only really good ones, the characters upon which the divisions and sub-di- visions of the animal kingdom are based, are selected in such a manner that each group includes only such species as resemble each other the more in proportion as this group itself is of a less elevated rank in the classification. The animals of the same genus, for example, will differ much less from each other than those of two genera of the same family, and these latter will re- semble each other much more than those belonging to different orders, and in a still stronger degree, than those of different classes. The natural classification is, in a manner, a synoptical view of all the variations met with in the organization of animals, and in knowing the place which any animal occupies in such a method or classification, we know by it alone the most remarkable features of its organization, and the manner in which its most important functions are performed, that is to say, the most important part of its history, because its habits are always correspondent with its conformation. DIVISION OF THE ANIMAL KINGDOM INTO BRANCHES. 16. In ranging animals according to their different degrees of resemblance and according to the differences more or less con- siderable which distinguish them, we first remark, that there exists in the animal kingdom, four principal types according to which nature seems to have constructed all these beings ; they are divided into four great divisions or BRANCHES, namely : 1st. Animalia vertebrata — vertebrated animals. 2nd. Animalia mollusca — molluscous animals. 3rd. Animalia articulata — articulated animals. 4th. Animalia radiata— radiated or rayed animals or zoophytes. 17. The following table presents the principal characters which distinguish these great divisions of the animal kingdom : are the characters of animals selected in the classifications according to tho natural methods ? What does natural classification enable us to know ? Do the habits of an animal correspond to its organization and conformation ? 16. In classifying animals what do we first observe? What arethegrcat divisions of the animal kingdom? 17 (O" The folio icing questions ore answered in the table.) What are the leading characters of animals belonging to the branch of vertebrated animals? How is this branch divided ? What sort of blood have these animals ? tro o £ £•£• «•* Jt> 3 ?I ft II || II r— # II s.§ « . 11 -. CD rlsS-iS. riiffffttj |c:|lll|| I a.5tS'|.o(l """ * - tr PH Divid Echino Polypi it* ni 18 GENERAL CHARACTERS OF VERTEBRATEP ANIMALS. FIRST BRANCH OF THE ANIMAL KINGDOM. ANIMALIA VERTEBRATA. GENERAL CHARACTERS OF VERTEBRATED ANIMALS. 18. The vertebrated animals are, of all animated beings, those whose faculties are most various and most perfect ; whose organs are most numerous and most complicated. 19. The existence of a solid frame in the interior of the body enables them to attain a size which the articulated animals, mol- lusca and zoophytes never reach ; and this skeleton, all the parts of which are united one to the other so as to allow of motion, gives to their movements a precision and a vigour which are rarely seen in other animals. 20. The portion of the skeleton which is never wanting, which varies least, and which is, at the same time, the most important of all, is the bony stem that encloses the encephalon, and which is formed by the cranium and vertebral column. 21. The external senses are always five in number, and the organs which are the seat of them, present with slight variation, the same disposition as in man. What are the characters which distinguish animals belonging to the branch of molluscous animals? How is this branch divided ? Have animals of this branch a brain or spinal marrow ? What is the nature of their nervous system? Do animals of this branch possess an internal skeleton ? What are the characters which distinguish animals belonging to the branch of articulated animals? What is the character of the nervous system of this branch? Has this branch an internal skeleton ? What kind of blood do animals of this branch possess ? What classes of animals are included in this branch? What are the characters which distinguish animals of the branch of radiated animals? What is the form of the bodies of animals of this branch? What is the character of their nervous system ? Have these animals a heart? What is the color of their blood ? What classes does this branch include ? 18. What branch of the animal kingdom includes the most perfectly or- ganised animals ? 19. What are the chief advantages derived from an internal skeleton by animals of the branch of vertebrata? 20. What part of the skeleton is never absent in the vertebrated animals ? 21. What is the number of the senses in the vertebrata? What is their disposition ? [See Physiology and Animal Mechanism — Lesson viii. and is.. DIVISION OF THE VERTEBRATA INTO CLASSES. 19 22. The apparatus of digestion, in this great division of the animal kingdom, offers but very slight differences. 23. The blood is always red, and circulates in vessels called arteries and veins. It is always set in motion by a fleshy heart; but the conformation of this last organ, as well as the route of the blood in the circulatory system, varies in the different classes of this branch. 24. Respiration always takes place in an apparatus situated in an internal cavity of the body, but it is not always aerial as in man ; it is sometimes aquatic, and then the lungs are replaced by branchiae. DIVISION OF THE BRANCH OF THE VERTEBRATED ANIMALS INTO CLASSES. 25. Nature seems to have followed the same general plan in the creation of all vertebrated animals, but nevertheless, these beings differ from each other, and some of the differences which they present, are of great importance in the exercise of life. 26. Therefore, that the classification of the vertebrated ani- mals may be, in a manner, a picture of the modification of their organization, it becomes necessary to establish amongst them, four grand divisions, called classes, which are named as follows : MAMMALIA, BIRDS, REPTILES, FISHES. 27. The following table presents at a view, the principal characters of these classes : 22. What is remarked of the apparatus of digestion in this great division of the animal kingdom ? 23. What is the color of the blood in the vertebra ta ? How does it circu- late ? How is the blood set in motion ? Is the conformation of the heart and the route of the blood in the circulatory system always the same in the different classes of the branch of vertebrata ? 24. How does respiration take place in the vertebrata? Is it always aerial as in man ? When respiration is aquatic, is it effected through the medium of lungs? 25. In what respect are the differences presented by vertebrated animals important ? 26. How many classes compose the branch of vertebrata ? What are these classes called? 27. (KTQuestions answered by the table.') What are the characters of ani- mals of the class mammalia? How many cavities-has the heart? Is the blood warm or cold in animals of this class ? What is the character of the respiration in the class of birds ? Is the blood cold in this class of animals ? How many cavities has the heart ? 20 GENERAL CHARACTERS OF MAMMALIA. Viviparous, and provided with teats, to suckle "] (Classes.) their young. Lungs; respiration simple ; blood warm ; circu- }- Mammalia. lation double and complete ; heart with four dis- " ' --- J tmct cavities. Oviparous, and without teats. f Respiration double; blood warm ; circula- tion double and com- }• Birds. Respiration '™* heart with four aerial; with J ^tirict cavities. lungs. ' Respiration simple; . I blood cold ; circulation \ incomplete; heart ge. \-Reptiles. I nerally with but th:ee I L cavities, j Respiration aquatic ; with branchia; > „. , .blood cold; heart wilh but two cavities. \ *lsfte8' LESSON II. MAMMALIA — Peculiarities of organization of Animals of this Class. — Division into orders. CLASS OF MAMMALIA. GENERAL CHARACTERS OF THE MAMMALIA. 1. The class of mammalia is composed of man, and all ani- mals which resemble him in the most important parts of their organization ; this class is naturally placed at the head of the animal kingdom as comprising those beings whose movements are most varied, whose sensations are most delicate, faculties most numerous, and intelligence most developed ; it interests us more than any other class, because it includes the most useful animals, either in affording us nourishment, assisting in our labors, or contributing towards our manufactures. 2. The mammalia are born alive, and in the early period of life, are nourished by the mother with milk, which is formed in glands called mammce, or teats; animals of this class alone are provided with these organs, and for this reason they are called mammalia, or mammiferous animals. What is the character of the respiration in Reptiles ? What is the char- acter of the blood of Reptiles ? Is the circulation complete ? How many cavities has the heart in the class of Reptiles ? What is the character of the respiration of fishes ? How many cavities has the heart ? Is the blood of fishes warm or cold ? 1. What animals are included in the class of mammalia? Why is this class placed at the head of the animal kingdom ? 2. How are animals of the class mammalia nourished ? Why are they called mammalia or mammiferous 1 GENERAL CHARACTERS OF MAMMALIA. 21 3. Circulation and respiration are carried on in the same man- ner as in man. In all the mammalia the blood is warm, and the heart has four distinct cavities ; two ventricles and two auricles. The lungs are always composed of a great number of very small cells, and do not permit the air to pass from them into different parts of the body, as is the case in birds. 4. In general, it is easy to distinguish at first sight, one of the mammalia from a bird, a reptile, a fish, or any other animal, by simply considering its external form, and the nature of its integu- ments ; the mammalia are in fact, the only animals whose bodies are covered with hair ; ordinarily their general form does not widely differ from that of the quadrupeds which are constantly before our eyes, and which we naturally take as the type of the group; but sometimes they are not recognised by so superficial an examination ; for there are some whose skirts are completely bare, and whose bodies, instead of resembling that of a horse, a dog, or any other one of the ordinary mammalia, possess forms proper to fishes : the dolphin and whale are examples of this kind.— (Plate 6, fig. 6, 7, and 9.) 5. The hairs of the mammalia are very analogous to the feathers of birds, and serve in the same manner to protect the skin, and preserve the heat developed in the interior of the body; in reptiles, fishes and other cold blooded animals which do not manifestly produce internal heat, there does not exist any similar envelope. 6. The hairs are produced like the teeth, by small secreting organs, lodged in the thickness of the derma, or immediately be- neath it. Each hair is formed in a little pouch or bulb, which communicates externally by a narrow opening. They grow, like the teeth, at the base, or new matter is added beneath that which is already formed. 7. On examining the hairs with a microscope, we sometimes perceive, very distinctly, that they are formed of a number of little horns received one into the other, (like a nest of boxes,) but in general, they have the appearance of a simple horny tube, the 3. How is the circulation of the blood carried on in the class mammalia? Is their blood warm or cold ? How many cavities has the heart? What is the character of the lungs of these animals ? Does the air pass from the lungs to different parts of the body ? 4. What general characters enable us to distinguish animals of the class mammalia from those of any other class ? Do all animals of the class mammalia bear a general resemblance to common quadrupeds? 5. What is the use of the hairs on the bodies of the mammalia ? 6. How are the hairs produced ? How do they grow? 7. What is the structure of hairs ? 22 GENERAL CHARACTERS OF MAMMALIA. interior of which seems to be filled with a pulpy matter. With most animals they are cylindrical and larger at the base than at the summit; they are often more or less flattened; there are some which are lamellar and similar to a slip of grass ; some- times their surface seems to be perfectly smooth, at others channelled, or armed with slight asperities, or even presenting a necklace-like (moniliform) aspect ; finally, their size, form and elasticity vary very much in different animals and in the different hairs of the same individual. 8. The names by which the different varieties of hairs are distinguished, differ according to the nature of these horny fila- ments, and according to the parts whereon they grow. They are called quills or spines, when they are very thick, pointed, and stiff, and when they resemble thorns, (as in the porcupine) ; bristles, when not so thick and less resisting, but still, very stiff, except towards their extremities; hairs do not differ much from bristles except in being somewhat longer and not so thick ; like bristles, they are generally straight, though they are sometimes curly, particularly when very long. Wool is a species of long hair, very fine, and contorted in every direction : and down or fur is composed of hairs of extreme fineness and softness, and is generally found beneath a layer or covering of stouter hairs. 9. All the mammalia, except the cetacea, (that is, dolphins, porpoises, &c.) have two pairs of extremities or members, namely ; one pair of thoracic or anterior, or upper extremi- ties, and one pair of posterior (inferior) or abdominal extremi- ties; but in the cetacea this latter pair is absent, and conse- quently, there only exists the thoracic members. The structure of all these animals is nearly the same as that of man, and the differences observed, principally depend upon the relative length of the different bones, and the number of fingers, which never ex- ceeds five. 10. The conformation of the extremities varies somewhat ac- cording to the uses for which they are designed. They may serve 1. For walking, leaping, &c.; 2. For prehension and touch; 3. For burrowing in the earth ; 4. For swimming ; and 5. For flying; and when they are best adapted to the performance of one of these functions, they are in a very slight degree, or not at all suited to the others. 8. WheYi do hairs take the name of quills or spines ? What are bristles '{ What is wool ? What is fur ? What is down ? 9. How many extremities have the mammalia ? 10. Is the conformation of the extremities the sawe in all the mammalia? GENERAL CHARACTERS OF MAMMALIA. 23 11. When the extremities are designed only to sustain the body and to move it over the surface of the ground, they should possess great solidity, and be at the same time slender towards the end, that they may be the lighter ; now, long and flexible fingers or toes would be injurious to this solidity, and a considerable number of these organs would augment the weight of the foot without any advantage; therefore, with those animals whose four feet only serve them in moving, (walking or run- ning) the fingers or toes are generally but two or three in num- ber, short, slightly flexible, and completely enveloped at their ex- tremity, by nails, which protect them. 12. When the extremities are designed chiefly for touch, and the prehension of objects, it is altogether different ; they are then very flexible, terminated by five fingers which are long, well separated from each other, and so moveable that one of them, at will, can change position, and apply itself against the others, like a pair of plyers or pincers ; the nail is in this case flat, and only covers the back of the end of the fingers, the lower surface of which resembles a soft cushion ; and the whole hand can move upon the fore-arm, to direct itself inwardly or outwardly, as occasion may require. 13. The hoofs of the horse may be taken as an example of the mode of conformation of extremities, which are designed only for moving the animal ; and the hand of man, as an example of the conformation of these same organs when they are designed for prehension and touch. But between these extremes there are a great many intermediate degrees, and with a great many of the mammalia, the paws serve at once the purposes of progression, prehension, and touch, and discharge best, either one or other of these functions, according as their conformation most approaches to one or the other of the two modes of structure, just spoken of. 14. The mammalia that climb best, generally have paws more or less like our hand, and suited for seizing hold of objects ; there are some, however, that by the assistance of very sharp nails, 11. What are the characters of the extremiiios when they are designed merely to sustain the animal in walking? Have they many long flexible toes? How imny toes has an animal that usually goes on all fours? 12. What are the characters of the extremities when designed for touch or prehension ? 13. Give examples of the different conformation of extremities according to their uses ? 14. What are the means or instruments provided for those mammalia that climb? Do any of this cla-s ever assist themselves in climbing by any other means than their hands or feet? 24 GENERAL CHARACTERS OF MAMMALIA. can climb trees simply grappling them, although their fingers are neither long, veiy flexible, nor opposable one to the other. Most animals of this kind have a long tail which serves them as a balance-pole, and sometimes this organ is so flexible as to be twisted around branches, and take the place of a species of hand, 1 5. Differences are also observed in the conformation of the extremities, according as the animal is designed to run or leap ; in the latter case, the posterior extremities are generally much longer than the anterior — for example, the rabbit and particularly the kangaroo. (Plate 3,jtf"! » 2 p „ x" a S^, e-* S° w I 5r S.fSi'3 r;3 cf a, I 3 g I- 1|' »— • CT. CD ^ ,— ^«2 3 P'O 3i-*iy3^**£. ICi !=: o5^: p. I I s 1 5" P g"» S ° t? ®. L. P 3 S^OE-'S- P'§ f 3 § ^ /-v 5± 2- CD W?3 2 If I S?§. I' sis, i'l'f I |?! M 28 NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. LESSON III. ORDER OP BIMANA. — The only species, man, — Anatomical characters which distinguish the body of man fiom that of the other mammalia. — Hands. — Feet. — Station. — Brain. — Human Races. ORDER OF BIMANA. 1. The order of Bimana — two-handed — easily distinguished from the rest of the class of mammalia, by the existence of hands, on the thoracic extremities only, and by many other anatomical characters, is composed of but one genus embracing one species only: MAN.— HOMO. 2. Our organization differs very little from that of a great num- ber of other mammalia; the functions of the life of nutrition are carried on in the same manner in them as with us, and the struc- ture of the organs of our senses presents only a few peculiarities ; but still man is placed at an immense distance from all other animals, and what especially distinguishes him, is that wonderful intelligence with which he is endowed, and the possession of an immortal soul. The principal physical differences which distinguish man, are: 3. 1. The great devel)f>ernent of his bram, which produces the prominence of his forehead. 4. 2. The conformation of his hands. The thoracic extremi- ties of man are disposed in the most favourable manner for the exercise of their functions as organs of prehension and touch : the lingers are long and flexible ; they all have the power of moving separately and distinctly one from the other, which is not the case in other animals, not even with those that possess hands. The thumb, which is opposable to them, is much longer in pro- portion than in monkeys, and, consequently, more readily ap- plied to the extremity of the palmar face of the other fingers, .and better enabled to take hold of small objects. The nails only cover the dorsal faces of the extremities of the fingers, and they 1. What is the meaning of the word Bimana? How are the Bimana •distinguished ? How many genera and species compose the order Bimana? 2. Does the organization of the Bimana essentially differ from that of the mammalia ? What especially distinguishes man from all other animals ? 3. How does the brain of man differ from that of the other mammalia? 4. What are the peculiarities of the hand of man ? NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. 29 are wide and flat, thus affording a support to the touch, without in the least interfering with its delicacy; finally, the whole hand is capable of performing extensive rotatory movements. 5. His vertical and biped position. In all the mammalia, with the exception of man, the superior (anterior) extremities are ap- plied to the same uses as the lower (or posterior; extremities, and are always employed in locomotion, even when they are formed so as to be used also as organs .of prehension ; in man, on the con- trary, the lower extremities serve exclusively for station, (the act of standing) and for locomotion, while the superior extremi- ties remain free to act as the organs or instruments of prehen- sion and of touch, a difference in itself sufficient to render them fit to discharge their function with a degree of perfection far above any thing seen in the monkey tribes and other mammalia. The vertical position, which under every circumstance, is so very favourable to man, has been considered by some authors, as not being natural to him, and as being solely the effect of education ; but this is an error. Even if he should wish to do so, man could not habitually walk on his four extremities; of all the mammalia the lower extremities of man are most favourably formed for sus- taining the body, and every thing, in his whole organization, is disposed for the vertical position. The foot is very large and so fashioned as to rest nearly the whole of its lower surface upon the ground ; the different bones of which it is formed are solidly united one to the other, and the leg rests vertically upon it ; the heel projects considerably behind this articulation ; the knee can be completely extended, so that the weight of the body is trans- mitted directly from the femur to the tibia; the muscles which extend the foot and the thigh are remarkable for their volume and strength ; the pelvis is much larger than in other animals, which by separating the legs and feet from each other, increases the extent of the base of support ; finally, the head is nearly balanced on the trunk, because its articulation is placed beneath the centre of its mass, and the eyes are directed forward, precisely in the direction to be most useful to him. 6. The horizontal position, on the contrary, would be extremely inconvenient for man, for then his (hind) feet, short and almost inflexible, and his very short thigh, would bring his knee against the earth, while his anterior (superior) extremities would be too flexible and too widely separated to afford him a solid support ; 5. What is the position of man ? Could man sustain with ease, for any considerable Itnjjth of time, any other than the vertical position? Why can he not £0 on all fours? 6. Why would the horizontal position be inconvenient for man? 30 NATURAL HISTORY OF MAN. the position of the head, its weight, and the absence of the cer- vical ligament, which in quadrupeds serves to sustain this part of the body, would not permit him to keep it elevated, and his eyes being directed downwards to the ground, he would not be able to see before him. But this position would not be one of restraint only, it would be impossible to maintain it for any length of time, because the arteries which go to the brain, are not sub-divided in man, as they are in many quadrupeds ; and their size being very considerable, the blood would be carried to this delicate organ with so much force that apoplexy would frequently result. 7. Man is the only one of the mammalia that is truly bimana and biped — (two-handed, and two-footed.) The monkey which re- sembles him iii many respects, has the superior extremities dis- posed like his, but the foot is very different ; it is strictly a true hand fitted for seizing and climbing, while our foot can in no manner, serve as an organ of prehension, because the toes have but little flexibility, and the great toe, (answering to the thumb,) is larger than the other toes (which correspond to the fingers of the hand,) and being placed upon the same line, is not opposable to them. 8. 4th. The perfection of his vocal apparatus. He is the only animal of this class that can articulate sounds, and it is to this faculty that he is indebted for language. 9. But man who is so much favoured in regard to his intelligence and skill, has not the advantage as regards strength. His swift- ness in the race is much less than that of animals of his stature, and Nature has not endowed him with arms either for defence or attack. The greater part of his body is unprotected, even by hair, from the inclemencies of the weather, and he is of all animals, the longest in acquiring the strength necessary to enable him to supply his own wants. 10. If God had not given to man a social instinct, a love for society, and the powerful intelligence which distinguishes him, he would have been one of the most miserable beings that in- habit the surface of the earth, and probably his race would have soon disappeared ; but this instinctive impulse, joined to a sense of his weakness, has brought him to living in society with his fellow- men, and now, his intellectual faculties have enabled him to derive something from all that surrounds him, towards insuring his sub- sistence and happiness. 7. In what particulars do monkeys differ from man? 8. To what faculty is man indebted for language ? 9. In what respect is man superior to other animals ? In what is he in- ferior to them ? 10. What circumstances render man able to secure his subsistence and happiness 1 £ VARIETIES OF THE HUMAN SPECIES. 31 The detail into which we entered, relative to the structure of man, in treating on Physiology and Anatomy, in the first of this series, (See " Physiology and Animal Mechanism,") renders it unnecessary to speak of his organization in this place. THE HUMAN RACE. 1 1 . In the human race, as we have said, there is but a single species ; nevertheless, all men are far from being alike, and the principal differences which they present, are transmitted, uninter- ruptedly, from generation to generation ; so that we must admit, into this single species, several very distinctly marked varieties. 12. The people who inhabit the old world appear to belong to three principal varieties, designated by naturalists under the names of Caucasian Race, Mongolian Race, and Ethiopian Race. 13. The CAUCASIAN VARIETY, (Plate \,fiy. !•) is distinguished by the beauty of the oval formed by the head, by the develope- ment of the forehead, the horizontal position of the eyes, the slight projection of the cheek bones and jaws, the smooth hair, and white, or at. least, whitish color of the skin ; it is also remark- able for its perfectibility, for it has given origin to all the most civilized people on earth. It occupies all Europe, the western part of Asia, and the most northern part of Africa ; but it is be- • lieved to have come first from the mountains of Caucasia, situate between the Caspian and Black Seas, and for this reason it has been called Caucasian. 14. The MONGOLIAN VARIETY, (Plate 1, fig. 2.) differs in many respects from the Caucasian variety ; here the face is flattened ; the forehead low, retreating and square ; the cheek bones project- ing ; the eyes narrow and oblique ; the chin slightly projecting ; the beard thin, the hair straight and black, and the skin of an olive color. The languages proper to the Mongolian races pos- sess characteristics common to them all, which clearly separate them from people of Caucasian origin : the words of which the Mongolian languages are composed are all monosyllabic. 15. This variety of the human race is found to the ea^t of those regions which are inhabited by the Caucasian race?; we first 11. Are all the races of men like e ch other? 12. Into what varieties have the people of the old world been distinguished ? 13. What are the peculiarities of the Caucasian variety ? How is the term Caucasian derived ? 14. What are the peculiarities of the Mongolian variety ? What is the character of the languages of the Mongolian race ? 15. In what parts of the world is the Mongolian variety found ? What remarkable nation is composed of the Mongolian variety ? To what variety of the human race do the inhabitants of Japan, Corea, and the Caroline Islands belong ? 32 VARIETIES OF THE HUMAN SPECIES. meet them in the great desert of central Asia, where are found the Calmuck and other Mongolian tribes that are still wanderers : almost all the tribes of the eastern part of Siberia belong to them ; but the most remarkable nation composed of men of this race, is the Chinese, whose vast empire claims to have been civilized be- fore the rest of the world. Corea, Japan, the Marian Isles, the Caroline Isles, and all other lands which extend to the north of the equator, from the first named of these archipelagos to about the 180th degree of east longitude, are also peopled by the Mon- golian races. Also, the inhabitants of the Aleutian Isles, and of the neighbouring part of the west coast of America, belong to this great division of the human species. 16. The Malays, who occupy India beyond the Ganges, and a great part of the Asiatic archipelago, constitute, according to some naturalists, a variety distinct from the Mongolian and Caucasian ; but most authors regard them as the offspring of the two races. 17. Finally, the Mongolian races appear to be spread through the northern region of the two hemispheres, for all the mixed or mongrel tribes met with from North Cape, in Europe, to Greenland, who are known under the name of Laplanders, Samoides, Esqui- maux, &c., bear a strong resemblance to them. 18. A third, and very distinct branch of the human race, is the ETHIOPIAN, or NEGRO VARIETY, (I'latc 1,/fy. 3.) characterised by the compressed skull, the flattened nose, the projecting muzzle, thick lips, crisped hair, and skin more or less black. It is confined to the south of mount Atlas, and appears to be composed of several very distinct races or tribes, such as the Mozambique, the Bocbisman and Hottentot. 19. The primitive population of Australia, and of the numer- ous archipelagos of Oceanic'a or Polynesia, is also a black race, which bears a considerable resemblance to the negroes of Mozam- bique, but their hair, although coarse, is straight ; of the barba- rous and miserable people to whom the name of Alforians, or Alfores has been given, we- have very little knowledge. 20. Finally, the aborigines of America are regarded by some naturalists, as belonging to neither of the three varieties of the 1C. What parts of the world are inhabited by Malays ? To what variety do they belong ? 17. To what variety do the La panders, Samoides and Esquimaux belong1 ? 18. How is the Ethiopian variety characterised ? What are the principal tribes of this variety ? 19. In what respect do the primitive inhabitants of Australia and Polynesia differ from the Ethiopian variety ? What is known of the Alforians ? 20. Do the inhabitants of America form a distinct variety or race of the human family? What are the characteristics of Americans ? THE AMERICAN RACE. 33 human race inhabiting the old world. Some bear a strong re- semblance to the Mongolian races of Asia ; others on the con- trary, approach somewhat to the European form. '« The American Race," according to Professor Morton, — the highest authority on this subject, — " is marked by a brown com- plexion, long, black, lank hair, and deficient beard. The eyes are black arid deep set, the brow low, the cheek bones high, the nose large and aquiline, the mouth large, and the lips tumid and compressed. The skull is small, wide between the parietal pro- tuberances, prominent at the vertex, and flat on the occiput. In their mental character, the Americans are averse to cultivation, and slow in acquiring knowledge ; restless, revengeful, and fond of war, and wholly destitute of maritime adventure." — CRANIA AMERICANA. The American Race is divided into two families : The American Family. | The Toltecan Family. (£/~ For the type of this race, see frontispiece. LESSON IV. ORDER OF QUADRUMANA. — Zoological characters. — Peculiarities of their organization compared to their habits. — Division into three families. — Their Zoological characters. FAMILY OP MONKEYS. — Dwisioh into monkeys of the old and new continent. — Description and habits of the principal genera — (Ourangs, Gibbons, Gucnons, Magots, Cynocephalus, — Howl- ing Monkey.} FAMILY OP OUISTITIS. — Manners. FAMILY OP MAKIS, — Description, and Habits. ORDER OP THE QUAPRUMANA. 1. The order of quadrumana is composed of a considerable number of animals which resemble man more than any other of the mammalia, and which are chiefly characterised by their having both the thoracic and abdominal extremities terminated by hands. (Plate I, fig. 4, to 12.) 2. Like the Bimana, the quadrumana have incisor, canine and molar teeth. Their eyes are directed forward, or at least, ob- 1. What chiefly characterises animals of the order Quadrumana? What is the meaning of the term Quadrumana? 2. What kinds of teeth have the Quadrumana ? In what particulars do the Quadrumana resemble man ? 34 MONKEY FAMILY. liquely and their mamma are situated on the chest. We may also add that their brain resembles that of man very much, and each hemisphere consists of three lobes, the posterior of which covers the cerebellum; and their abdominal viscera scarcely differ from ours. 3. The order of Quadrumana is divided into three families : Monkeys, Ouistitis, and Makis. The following table exhibits a synopsis of the most prominent distinctive characters of these three groups. Families. Nails sed, arched and QUADRUMANA. <| Ouistitis. Having four incisor teeth in each jaw, placed very ^ pointed like claws, nearly in a vertical position, on all the fingers, except the poste- rior thumbs, or t great toes. Having the incisor teeth more numerous than the Monkey or Ouistitis, or at least differently disposed. Nails flat, except that of the first, or }• Makis. j of the two first fingers (or toes) posteriorly, j L which is pointed and raised. J MONKEY FAMILY.-SIMIA. 4. Monkeys are animals of middle or small stature, whose heads are almost always rounded, the muzzle moderately elon- gated, the neck short, the body light, and extremities slim, (Plate 1, fig. 4. to 9.) They are covered with long silky hair; nevertheless, their resemblance to man is very considerable, and there are some, which when very young, have the facial angle not much more oblique than that of negroes ; but as they advance in age the muzzle always becomes much more projecting, and with some monkeys, this part of the face is so much developed as to resemble that of the dog. The actions and behaviour of these animals bear a strong analogy to our own. Many of them assume with ease an almost vertical position, particularly when aided by a stick, as we use a cane, and some walk in this way, but never so firmly as man ; on the contrary they are admi- rably organized for climbing from branch to branch. The length and flexibility of their limbs, having hands on all four extremities, 3. Into how many families is the order Quadrumana divided ? What are they? What number of incisor teeth have monkeys? How many incisors have the Ouistitis ? What kind of nails have monkeys ? What sort of nails have Ouistitis ? How are the nails characterised ? 4. What are monkeys? How are they characterised? • MONKEY FAMILY. 35 and the great strength of their muscular system, permit them to display an astonishing agility, and nature has moreover, supplied many of these animals with a long prehensile tail, which serves them as a fifth hand, in suspending themselves from branches, to balance themselves in the air, and make their spring when they wish to leap from one tree to another. 5. Monkeys are essentially frugivorous, and their teeth bear a great similitude to those of man. Their molar teeth are tuber- culated like ours, but their canine are much longer. 6. Monkeys belong to warm countries ; a single species lives wild in Europe, on the rock of Gibraltar, and what is very re- markable, all those of the new world possess characters which distinguish them from those of the old continent. 7. These zoological, characteristics, so strictly in harmony with the geographical distribution of monkeys, have caused them to be divided into two tribes: monkeys of the old world, and monkeys of America. They may be distinguished by the following char- acteristics : Molar teeth ; five on each side, in each jaw, (as in man.) Almost always possess ischiatic callosities, OF THE species of fleshy cushions placed beneath OLD CONTINENT. the pelvis. Tail never prehensile. Nares open beneath the nose, and separated by a narrow partition, Che.ks often hollowed into pouches called SIMIA. cheek pouches, which communicate with the mouth, and serve as reservoirs of food MONKEYS. I obtained by the animal. Molar teeth ; six on each side, and in each jaw. Ischialic callosities never present. OF THE ^ Tail, often prehensile. NEW CONTINENT. Nares, almost always separated by a broad partition, and open at the sides of the 5. On what substances do monkeys feed ? What is the character of their molar teeth ? 6. In what pirts of the word are monkeys found? Are the monkeys of the old and new world alike ? 7. How are monkeys divided ? How. are monkeys of the old world dis- tinguished from those of the new ? What is the character of the tail ? How do the nares open ? How do the nares of the monkeys of the new conti nent open ? 4 36 MONKEY FAMILY. MONKEYS OF THE OLD CONTINENT. 8. These animals are quite numerous, and, in their organiza- tion, seem to form a series, which leads by degrees from man to common quadrupeds : the position of their bodies, almost verti- cal in some, becomes in others entirely horizontal, their muzzle is elongated, and we remark at the same time, their passions be- come, proportionably, more and more violent and brutal. 9. The principal genera, composing the tribe of monkeys of the old world, may be recognised by the following characters. MONKEYS OF THE OLD CONTINENT. Et o OB p a. cr^r g- o> oq o P jr. o :3 111 t 1 !f MM t §-"82- 5'^^i^ r<; 2 S 1 B-gs'w'O -O^ Iir« P 3 *s > S O s a P CO JOPJTHECUS. GUENONS. GIBBONS. OURANGS. (Genera.) 8. What is remarked of monkeys of the old continent ? 9. What are the principal genera of the monkeys of the old continent? What are ihe chief distinguishing characters of the Ourangs ? How do the Gibbons differ from the Ourangs ? What are the distinguishing characters of the Guenons ? How does the Semnopithecus differ from them ? Whai characterises the Macacus ? How do you distinguish the Cynocephalus from other monkeys ? MONKEY FAMILY. 37 10. The OuRANcsare the only monkeys of the old continent des- titute of ischiatic callosities. The most remarkable species of this genus the OURANG-OUTANG, which inhabits the interior of Borneo, and other large islands of the Indian Ocean, when young1, is said, to resemble man more than any other animal. (Plate I- Jig. 4.) 11. The body is covered with coarse reddish hair, and the face is smooth and bluish ; he sometimes attains the height of seven feet, and possesses great strength and agility; he dwells in the wildest forests and habitually keeps himself upon the trees; he climbs with the greatest rapidity and springs from branch to branch with as much facility and skill as the little monkeys of America, which are often seen in our streets. On the ground, on the contrary, Ourang Outangs walk with difficulty, and are fre- quently obliged to place their hands upon the earth ; we see them, using their long arms to raise themselves up, and throw them- selves forward, very much as a man would use a pair of crutches. It has been ascertained that these animals build themselves huts in lofty trees. It is very difficult to capture them when they have attained adult age, as they defend themselves in the most cou- rageous manner ; but when young they are easily taken ; they then show a good deal of intelligence, attach themselves to those who have care of them, and readily learn to imitate a great many of our actions. 12. Another species of the genus Ourang, is the Chimpanzee, (Plate \,fig. 5.) which inhabits the interior of Africa, and is also named Jocko. Its arms are not so long as those of the Ourang- Outang, and its forehead is very retreating ; its stature is less than that of man. It lives in troops. 13. The GIBBONS resemble the Ourang-Outangs in the length of their arms, but their forehead is very receding. They live in the most distant parts of the continent, and archipelago of India, and like the Ourangs inhabit the densest forests. They are not very susceptible of education, and domesticating them seems to make them lose their faculties 14. The Siamang differs from the other Gibbons in the man- ner in which the first phalanges of the second and third toes are 10. Have the Ourangs ischiatic callosities or not? When do Ourangs most resemble man? In what part of the world are they found? 11. What is the size of the Ourang? Does the Ourang-Outang walk with ease in the erect position ? How do they live ? 12. How is the Chimpanzee distinguished from the Ourang-Outang ? 13. In what particulars do the Gibbons resemble the Ourang-Oulangs ? In what part of , the world are they found? Are they readily educated ? 14. How does the Siamang differ from other Gibbons ? What are the habits of the Siamang ? Is the Siamang remarkable for the acuteness of any paj ticular sense ? 38 MONKEY FAMILY. united to each other by a membrane ; it merits notice from the singularity of its habits. These monkeys live in numerous troops, which seem to be under the direction of chiefs, more active and more robust than other individuals of the community ; during the day they preserve silence, concealed in the foliage, but at sunrise and sunset, they raise the most frightful cries. When on the ground, they can scarcely drag themselves along; and they climb slowly and with difficulty ; but they possess a vigilance which is rarely at fault. It is asserted that any sound, not understood by them, which is heard even at the distance of a mile, no matter how slight it may be, is sufficient, to put them to immediate flight. 15. The SEMNOPITHECUS closely resembles the Gibbon, and in- habits India. One of these monkeys, called the Entellus, (Plate l,Jry. 6.) is held in veneration by the Brahmins. lo. The GUENONS, commonly known under the name of long- tailed monkeys, inhabit all Africa. They acquire a middle stature, and in leaping from tree to tree display great agility, but they walk very little and with difficulty. 17. The MACACUS, — the Macaque resembles ordinary quad- rupeds in form, and generally has a short tail. It inhabits the southern parts of Asia. 18. The MAGOT (Inuus of Cuvier) differs from the Macaque only in the tail, which is reduced to a mere tubercle. This monkey inhabits Africa; but is found throughout the southern parts of Spain, and has become naturalized on the least accessi- ble parts of the Rock of Gibraltar. It is the only animal of the order quadrumana that inhabits Europe. When young, it is easily taught through fear of chastisement, to perform various tricks, and jugglers avail themselves of this fact to excite the curi- osity of the public; but like the Macaque, this monkey is very capricious and deceitful, and when old, it becomes mischievous and taciturn. 19. TheCvNOCEPHALUs, (Plate 1. Jig. 7.) or dog-head monkey, is the most brutal and fierce animal of this family, and next after the Ourang and Gibbon, it is the largest and strongest. Its extremi- ties are short, and its habitual mode of progression is on all fours. In leaping, it displays great agility, and habitually frequents the wildest mountains or wooded coasts. It feeds on fruits and vegetables ; and like the Guenons, the dog-head monkeys aid 15. What monkey is worshipped by the Brahmins? 16. What are the Guenons commonly called? 17. Describe the Macacus ? 18. How does the Magot differ from the Macacus ? Has it a long tail ? In what parts of the world is it found ? 19. What are the characters of the Cynocephalus ? What does it feed on ? MONKEY FAMILY. 39 each other in pillaging gardens and cultivated fields. Their strength and ferocity render them dangerous, even to man. They nearly all inhabit Africa. MONKEYS OF THE NEW CONTINENT. 20. The monkeys of the new world are distinguished from those of the old, by the characters which we have already pointed out ; but their habits are essentially the same. They inhabit the dense forests of this vast continent, and climb the highest trees with the most surprising agility. They all have a very long tail, which sometimes serves them as a balance-pole in maintaining their equilibrium, and some possess the power of wrapping the tail round objects and seizing them with so much strength that the animal can, in this manner, suspend itself from branches, as it would do with a fifth hand. (Plate I, fig- 8, and 9.) Accord- ing to the difference in the conformation of the tail, the monkeys of America are divided into two groups, namely ; 21. The SAPAJOUS, whose tails are prehensile, and for a part of their length without hair, or naked on the inferior surface. 22. The SAGOUINS, or SAKIS, in which the tail is not prehen- sile, and never naked on the inferior surface. 23. The SAPAJOUS are more agile than the Sakis, and almost always live upon trees ; this group is divided into many genera, one of which, designated by the name of SAJOU, or Sapajou, properly so called, is recognised by its tail being entirely covered with hair ; it is a species of this genus, very common in Guiana and Brazil, which is so frequently brought to Europe and this country, to amuse the public by its tricks and agility. 24. Other Sapajous known under the name of Alouattes, or howling monkeys, (Plate 1, fig. 9.) are equally worthy of our attention on account of their cries and the form of their muzzle; they have a pyramidal head, and an oblique visage, the lower jaw is extremely large, and the Os hyoides (hyoid bone) is formed in the most singular manner ; the body of this bone is very large, and consists of an osseous case with thin and elastic parietes, which contains two membranous pouches that communicate 20. Do the monkeys of the new continent differ in all respects from those of the old continent? What are the general characters of monkeys of America ? Upon the difference in the conformation of what part are the monkeys of America divided ? 21. What are the characters of the tails of the Sapajous ? 22. What are the characters of the tails of the Sagouins ? 23. Which are most active, the Sapajous or Sakis ? What are the char- acters of the Sajou ? 24. What are the peculiarities of the Alouattes ? Why are they called howling monkeys ? 4* 40 MONKEY FAMILY. with the larynx. The air finds its way into these cavities, and gives to the hoarse and disagreeable voice of these animals, a tone which has rendered them celebrated, and obtained for them the name of howling monkeys. Their howling, as travellers tell us, may be heard for more than a half a league around, and has something so fearful in it, that it may be mistaken for the noise oc- casioned by the sliding away of mountains. It is particularly at the rising or setting of the sun, or the approach of a storm that they make the forest echo to their frightful cries, and it appears they sometimes have recourse to this howling to alarm their ene- mies. These monkeys are very common in the great forests of Brazil. 25. The ATELES, (Plate. I, fig. 8.) are the Sapajous in which the thumbs are wanting on the anterior extremities. 26. Most of the SAKIS or Sagouins live in shrubberies, and are less active than the preceding. Some species never quit their retreat except about twilight, and there are some that are altogether nocturnal in their habits. FAMILY OF OUISTITIS. 27. This little group which is nearly related to the family of monkeys, and which for a long time was confounded with it, is peculiar to the new world, and yet, the Ouistitis differ less from the monkeys of the old continent than from those of America : in fact, like these last, they have but twenty molar teeth. The Ouistitis are small, agreeable looking animals, wi^h a round head, flat face, lateral nostrils, without either callosities or cheek-pouches, and a bushy tail which is not prehensile. (Plate \,fig. 10.) On the anterior extremities their thumbs are scarcely opposable to the other fingers ; and all their fingers, except the thumb of the posterior extremities, are armed with compressed nails which are pointed like claws ; by the aid of these nails they climb trees like squirrels, for, the conformation of their hands does not per- mit them to seize hold of branches like monkeys, to which the name of duadrumana is much more applicable. They live upon trees and are reputed to be gay, capricious, irascible and always in motion. FAMILY OF MAKIS. 28. The animals which belong to this family have the four thumbs well developed and opposable to the other fingers ; but, 25. What are the peculiarities of the Ateles ? 26. What are the habits of the Sakis ? 27. What peculiarities characterise the Ouistitis ? Have they callosities? What is the position of their nostrils? What is the character of their nails? 28. How arc the Makis distinguished from other monkeys ? ORDER CARNARIA. 41 generally they differ from the monkeys and the Ouistitis in their form, which more resembles that of the carnaria, and in the dis- position or number of their teeth. They are readily distinguished by the presence of a pointed or raised nail on the first or two first toes, or fingers of the posterior extremities, while the nails of the rest of the fingers are flat. (Plate \.-fig. 12 ) 29. This family is composed of several genera designated under the names of Maids properly so called (Lemur of Cuvier,) Loris, Tarsius, &c. 30. The Makis properly so called, ( Plate l,fiy. II.) exclusively inhabit the island of Madagascar, where they seem in a manner to take the place of monkeys. They are called, on account of the pointed shape of their heads, fox- headed, or fox-nosed monkeys. The inhabitants of the southern parts of Madagascar tame and train them for hunting, as we do the dog. LESSON V. ORDER CARNARIA. — Zoological characters. — Peculiarities of their organization. — Division into families. — Family of Cheirop- tera.— Zoological characters. — Tribe of Dais. — Peculiarities of organization.. — Habits.—- Frugivorous Bats, (example, the Rons»ctte} —Insectivorous Bats, (example, Vespertilio,0reillard) — Tribe, of Galeopitliecus. FAMILY OP INSECTIVORA. — Zoological characters. — Organization and habits of the Hedge-hog. — The Shrew, and the Mole. ORDER CARNARIA. 1. This great division of the class of mammalia is chiefly com- posed of predatory animals. Bears and other mammals which possess nearly the same organisation, are ranged under this head. 2. The characters which distinguish the Carnaria, are, being unguiculated like the Bimana and Quadrumana, having the mouth armed with three kinds of teeth, and like them, being born in the ordinary way, and in not having a pouch for the lodgement of their young, and not having the thumb opposable to the other fingers as in the two preceding orders. 29. Does the family of Makis contain more than one genus? 30. In what part of the world are the Makis, properly so called, found f Can tin Makis be trained for any purpose ? 1. What kind of animals compose the order Carnaria ? 2. What are the characters which distinguish the Carnaria ? 42 ORDER CARNARIA. 3. From the mode of life followed by most of these animals, it might be anticipated that their intestinal canal would be less voluminous and shorter than it is in those mammiferous animals which- are nourished by vegetable substances exclusively. The Carnaria, to seize and devour their prey, which generally strug- gles against them, require considerable strength in their jaws ; therefore, the muscles which bring them together are very volum- inous, giving to the heads of these animals very considerable size. In general, these organs are very short, and the manner of articu- lation of their lower jaw bone with the cranium, shows that their teeth are designed either to cut flesh or to crush insects, but not to grind herbs or roots : the articulation is transverse in its direc- tion, and is as compact as a hinge, so as to prevent lateral motion, and only permits the mouth to open and shut, like a pair of scissors. 4. These animals differ very much from each other in their forms and in their mode of living. They are divided into three great families, to wit ; the Cheiroptera, the Insectivora and the Carnivora, the distinctive characters of which are set down in the following table : (Families.) Having a species of wings, formed by a fold' of skin, which commencing from the sides of the neck, extends between their four extremities, and ^Cheiroptera. their fingers. Molar teeth, either flat on the crown, or armed with points. Order of CARNARIA tir:^ _..*_: I moiar ieein, armeu wim cum- Insectivora. Carnivora. the by?*58 ° 1 Molar teeth,' trenchant or cut- FAMILY OF CHEIROPTERA. 5. Most of the Cheiroptera are organized for flying rather than walking; indeed, in these mammiferous animals, and even in those that have not true wings, there exists, on each side of the body, a species of great sail formed by a fold of the skin, which extends from the neck to the hind-feet, and which extended and set 3. In what respect does the intestinal canal of the Carnaria differ from the intestinal canal of animals that live exclusively on vegetables ? Why are the jaws and teeth of the Carnariu very strong ? What is the charac- ter of the articulation of the jaw ? 4. Do animals which belong to the order Carnaria differ much from each other ? Into what f unilies is the orter Carnaria divided ? What are the peculiarities of the Cheiroptera? What is the character of their molar teeth ? What are the characters of the Insectivora? What is the character of their molar teeth ? What is the character of the molar teeth of the Carnivora? 5. For what kind of progression is the organization of the Cheiroptera best adapted ? Do all the Cheiroptera possess wings 7 TRIBE OF BATS. 43 in motion by the limbs of the animal, performs the office of a para- chute, by the help of \vhich he is enabled to sustain himself in the air, when he springs from an elevated point (Plate 2,/fy. l,and 7.) 6. All these animals are not equally well organized for flight, and on this account, they may be divided into tribes, as follows : (Tribes.,— /" Having wings, (formed by a mem-^ I brane which is sustained by excessively ^ Bat. Family | long fingers.) J of •{ Having parachutes, (formed by a fold ~\ CHEIROPTERA, I of skin on the sides which extends between I ~ 7 . , the limbs, but a very little amongst the ( ' *«******• [jingers, (toes) which are short, J Tribe of Bats. 7. These singular animals, (Plate 2, fig. 1, and 2.) seem at first sight, to partake as much of the bird as of the mammiferous animal, for, like the first, they are provided with strong wings, and are organised for flying in the air, rather than walking on the ground ; but if we examine the structure of their body with more attention, we perceive that, in reality, it differs only in a very slight degree from that of the ordinary mammalia, and these anomalies chiefly depend upon the extreme elongation of all parts of their anterior extremities. The wings of the Bats are in fact, nothing else than these extremities, in which all the bones, those of the fingers particularly, have become very long, and serve to sustain a prolongation of the skin of the flanks, just as the whale-bones of an umbrella serve to sustain the silk or cotton of which it is made. (Plate 2. fig. 3. — a. the humerus, — b. the fore arm. — c. the thumb. — d. the other fingers.} 8. These organs are not designed for aerial locomotion alone, like the wings of birds : when folded, they also serve the animal for creeping or suspending itself from some projecting body, (Plate %,fig. 2 ) and, for this purpose, they have a free thumb, which is short and armed with a hooked nail, like that of most other mammals, while the rest of their fingers, which are elongated beyond measure, lose their last phalanges as well as the nails, and are enveloped in a fold of skin, which extends from the sides of the neck to the posterior extremities, or even to 6. AreTHl the QMjiroptera equally well organised for flight? How is this family divided? -"IRniat are the organic characters of the tribe of Bats ? What are the characters of the tribe Galeopithecus ? 7. In what do Bats resemble birds ? In what do the Bats differ from other mammalia ? How do the wings of Bats differ from the anterior extremities of the mammalia? 8. Do the wings of Bats serve any other purpose than that of locomotion? 44 TRIBE OF BATS. 9. The posterior or abdominal extremities preserve their ordi- nary dimensions, and are very feeble : the hind feet are free and provided with rive small toes of equal size, terminated with hooked nails. 10. The progression or walk of these animals is extremely laborious, and is effected by a series of oblique tumbles, which fatigues them very much ; they never have recourse to this mode of progression, except when they are forced. When they wish, to change place, they effect it by flying, and when they wish to repose, they hook themselves to some projecting body from which they can readily make their spring. 11. Bats belong to those nocturnal animals that avoid the light; during the day they sleep concealed in caverns, or some other obscure place, and do not sally forth till the dusk of the evening. In winter they fall into a lethargic sleep, which often lasts during the cold season. Their eyes are exceedingly small, but their ears are often very large, and the species of tact which they exercise through the medium of the membranous sur- face of their wings, is so exquisite, that they can direct their course through all the nooks of their labyrinths, even after their eyes have been removed, and simply by the different impressions received from the air. 12. The diet of these animals is various ; all do not feed on animal substances, as might be believed, from the name of the class to which they belong. Some are frugivorous, and others insectivorous. 13. The FRDGIVOROUS BATS, have molar teeth with flat crowns, (Plate 2, fiy. 6.) and the second finger of the fore- paw armed with a nail, like the thumb ; as yet they have been only found in India, and are designated under the generic name of Roussettes. One species of these Bats, (the black Roussette,) has wings which, when expanded, extend about four feet, and, to protect the fruits from its devastations, they are sometimes obliged to cover the trees with nets. 1 4. The INSECTIVOROUS BATS, on the contrary, have the crown of the molar teeth studded with conical points which dovetail into each other. (Plate 2. fiy. 5.) They also differ from the preced- 9. What are the characters of the abdominal extremities of Bats ? 10. What is the mode of progression of Bats? Jj 11. Are Bats fond of light ? Are their eyes large? Have they very email ears ? What are the peculiarities oi the surface of their wings ? 12. What is the general diet of Bats ? 13. What are the characters of the frueivorous Bats? In what part of the world are these Bats found ? What is the Roussette ? 14. What are the characters of the molar teeth of the Insectivorous Bats ? In what respect do these Bats differ from others 7 • INSECTIVOROUS MAMMALS. 45 ing in many other characteristic particulars, such as the absence of the nail on the index finger. Of these animals a great many species are known. 15. Among those of France, we may cite; 1st the Vesperti^ lios, or ordinary bats, which have the ears separated, and of moderate size, and the nose without foliaceous, or leaf appendix, (by which several species are distinguished, namely, the common bat, the Serotinus, Pipistrellus, fyc.) 16. 2nd. The Long-eared Bats, (Oreil]ards)—VespcrtilioAuri~ tus — (Plate 2, fig. I, and 2.) whose immense ears are united together upon the cranium, (the common species found in kitchens, houses, &c., in France.) !/• 3d. The Rhinolophus, or Horse-shoe Bats, which may be easily distinguished by the foliaceous membranes and crests which are fixed on the nose, altogether presenting the figure of a horse-shoe, are found in quarries. 18. In South America there is a Bat, a foot long, which has the habit of sucking the blood of other animals while they are asleep ; it is known under the name of Vampire, (Plate 2, fig. 4.) and placed in the genus Phyllostoma. .There are also several species in the United States. Tribe of Galeopithecus. 19. These animals are mentioned by travellers, under the names of flying monkeys, and flying foxes, flying cats, &c. They inhabit the Indian archipelago, and have the four extremities formed in the ordinary manner, but united by a prolongation of skin, which extends from the sides of the neck to the tail, form- ing a great parachute, by the assistance of which these Cheirop- tera sustain themselves for a short time in the air, when they spring from one branch to another. (Plate 2. fig. 7.) They live upon trees and feed upon fruits. FAMILY OF INSECTIVORA. 20. This family is composed of Carnaria, whose molar teeth are studded with conical points like those of most of the Cheiroptera, but the skin of their flanks is not prolonged so as to form either wings or parachutes. These are feeble animals of J5. What are the characters of the Vespertilios ? J6. How are the long-eared B.ts characterised ? IQ wru characters distinguish the Rhinolophus? 10 rr ls the VamP"e ? Are there any Bats in the United States ? 19. How are animals of the tribe Galeopithecus distinguished? Have on aw? WmgS ? What is their diet ? on w -JU. What are the characters of the molar teeth of the insectivora ? Have ? J Wi"gS? ^^ "* lhe habUs of these animals ? Wha' 46 INSECTIVOROUS MAMMALS. small stature, which, during the day, conceal themselves in bur- rows or holes, from which they sally forth only at night. Many of them pass the winter in a state of lethargy ; as their name in- dicates, they live chiefly upon insects. 21. The principal genera composing this family are the hedge- hogs, shrews, and moles which are recognisable by the following characters : _ _ (Genera.) Family of paws of the ordinary ±,an±rmedWith I Body covered J with hair. Shrew*. Diggers, (posterior paws of a peculiar i form, and armed with very long nails, [ ,, , suitable for excavating, or digging the f Dearth. J 22. The HEDGEHOGS, — Erinaceus, — are small animals, which, without having the instinct to excavate burrows inaccessible J;o their enemies, without the activity necessary to escape their pur- suit, or strength to contend against them, are nevertheless capa- ble of advantageously protecting themselves and punishing any imprudent attack of their adversaries ; but to give them this power, nature has formed for them no new organs, but has merely modi- fied the hairs with which their backs are covered, and given a greater extent to certain of their movements, than is common in other quadrupeds. By flexing the head and paws beneath the belly, the Hedgehog can roll itself into a ball, and it also has the faculty of drawing the skin of the back in such a manner as to envelope itself, as in a purse ; now, the hairs with which this part of the tegumentary envelope is furnished, in stead of being flexible and silky, are stout, stiff, and sharp, and, when the skin is thus drawn, the spines are raised up, crossing each other in every direc- tion, bristling all parts of the animal's surface like so many spines or spears ready to lacerate and tear the mouth and paws of the aggressor. This powerfully defensive armour protects the Hedge- hogs from the attacks of most of the Carnaria, of which, with- out it, they would become the ready victims ; foxes however, are not deterred by these obstacles, and are often successful in seizing this dangerous prey. Their mouth is armed with twenty 21. What are the principal genera composing this family ? What are the organic characters of the genus Hedgehog ? What are the characters of the Shrews? How are the Moles distinguished ? 22. What are the peculiarities of the Hedgehog ? What is the number of their teeth ? How are they arranged ? What are their habits ? CARNIVOROUS MAMMALS. 47 teeth in the upper jaw, and sixteen in the lower jaw. They live in the woods and keep themselves concealed during the day amongst the roots of old trees. They are frequently met with in France, and in various parts of the world. It is said they mouse like a cat. 23. Shrews — Sorex — (Plate 2, fig 9.) are very small animals whose appearance reminds us of the mouse ; their body is covered with hairs, and on each flank there is found a small strip of stiff bristles between which there exudes an odorous humor. They have eighteen teeth in the upper, and twelve in the lower jaw. They keep themselves in holes which they excavate in the earth, and feed on worms and insects. The common Shrew, (sorcx araneus) has been accused, but very wrongfully, of causing a disease in horses and mules by its bite. Shrews are found in Asia, the north of Europe, &c. 24. The MOLES,— Taipei,— (Mate 2, fig. 10.) are essentially subterraneous, and burrowing animals; their body is squat, their muzzle elongated and terminated by a moveable snout, serving to penetrate the earth, and their anterior extremities, very short, but extremely strong and thick, are directed out- wardly, and terminate by enormous nails, suitable for digging. (IJlate 2, fig. 11 ) By the assistance of these organs, moles dig •with great rapidity and admirable sWl, long galleries in the soil in the midst of which they establish their abode. The small elevations we often see upon the surface of the soil, called mole hills, are formed by the riddance which these animals throw out when executing their subterranean labors. They very rarely leave their labyrinths, and feed on the worms and larvae of in- sects found there. They are destined, as we have seen, to live in total darkness; hence, their eyes are scarcely perceptible, and there is one species of mole which is entirely blind. They have twenty-two teeth in each jaw. The common mole of the fields of France, which is of a beautiful black, is found in all the fertile countries of Europe. It is said, they do not exist in Ireland, and are rarely met with in Greece. There are varieties of moles which are brown, white, ash-colored and spotted. 23. What are Shrews ? What is the number and disposition of their teeth? What are their habits ? In what parts of the world are they found ? What is their food ? 24. What are Moles? What are the peculiarities of their organization? What are their habits ? Have moles very large eyes ? Is there any species of Mole that is blind ? What is the number and arrangement of their teeth ? In what countries are they found ? 5 48 CARNIVOROUg^MAMMALS. __ _ LESSON VI. FAMILY OP CARNIVORA.— Zoological char acters.— Peculiarities of organization.— Division into three tribes. TRIBE OF PLANTIGRADA.— Zoological characters.— Organization and Habits of Bears, (Brown Bear, White Bear, Black Bear.}— Badgers.— Use of their hair. TRIBE OP DIGITIGRADAS.— Zoological characters.— Group of Ver- miform Digitigradas.—Hi*toty of the Pole-cat,( common Pole- cat, Ferret, Weasel, Ermine.-)— The Martens, (common Mai- ten, the Beech Marten, Sable.}— The Otters, (common Otter, Sea Otters-Genus of Dogs-History and Habits of some races, ( Wolws, Foxes.)-Genm of Civets (Civet, Common Wild-cat, Mangomte of Egypt.) -Genus of Hyenas.- Genus 4 of Cats.— Habits, (Lion, Tiger, Leopard, Couguar,Lynx, Lat) TRIBE OP AMPHIBIA.— Zoological characters.— Habits, (beal, the Morse.) CONTINUATION OP THE ORDER CARNARIA. FAMILY OF CARNIVORA. 1 In its most general acceptation, the word Carnivorous belongs to all animals that feed upon flesh, but naturalists give to this word, a more limited sigirfncation, and only apply it to this family of mammalia of the order Carnaria, which includes Bats, Hyenas, Martens, Dogs, &c., and which is easily distinguished by the ex- istence of teeth for tearing and cutting flesh. 2 In these animals, which generally possess great strength, a laws are stout, and each one is armed with two long, stout, se] rated canine teeth, and between these are placed six incisors. Sometimes the molar teeth are all trenchant ; sometimes they a mingled, some having blunt tubercles, but they never have com. cal points as in the insectivora. (Plate 2, fig. 12.) One of the great molars is ordinarily much larger and more penchant than the others, and bears the name of carnivorous tooth, (Mate *,pg. 12, ca.) behind it are one or two, almost flat, which are call< Ubtrculo**, (Hate 2, Jig. 12, «.) and between it and the cu ^ f a variable number of /«/«? molars. The form and disposition of these teeth are in relation to the more or less carnivorous Jiabits i. How i« the term Carnivorous applied? By what means can we re- whason of the canine teeth in the Carnivora ? What is the number of their incisor teeth ? What is the character of their n ''mat is the carnivorous tooth? What is meant by tuberculous tooth? What is the form and disposition of these teeth? Can we judge ot nature of the diet of a carnivorous animal by the teeth ! PLANTIGRADE MAMMALS. 49 of these animals. Those that live most exclusively on prey have the teeth most trenchant and the jaws shortest, (which increases their power,) while those that feed on vegetable substances as well as on flesh, have the molars for the most part tuberculous ; by the proportion of these trenchant and tuberculous teeth, we can judge of the more or less carnivorous nature of their diet. 3. Animals of this family generally have the paws armed with hooked nails, suitable for holding or even tearing their prey ; it is to be remarked also, that they are almost entirely without clavicles ; but the form of their extremities varies a great deal, and is in relation to the difference in their mode of progression, which is not less great. According to these characters the car- nivora are divided into the three following tribes ; Plantigrada, Digitigrada, and Jlmpkibia. (Tribes.) C Feet resting their whole ~) Having feet I length on the earth, the i p formed specially | soles of which are free ( for progression. J from hair. J | Feet not touching the 1 earth except by the ends of CARNIVORA. •{ the toes ; the tarsus being j (^elevated in progression. J Having feet in the form of paddles, so 1 short and so enveloped in the skin, that on ! A land, they can only crawl j but they are f AMP excellent swimmers. J Tribe of Plantigrada. 4. It is the zoological character of this tribe to have five toes on all the feet, and, when the animal walks or stands, to rest the entire sole upon the earth, (I'late 2, fig 13, and 14.) which affords him a broad base of support, and greater facility of stand- ing up on his hind feet. 5. All the motions of the Plantigrades are dull. Like the in- sectivora, they are subterraneous and nocturnal in their habits, and in cold countries pass the winter in a state of lethargy, or hibernation. The most remarkable genera of this tribe are the Bears, Rackoons, Badgers, and Gluttons, which may be recog- nised by the following characters : 3. What kind of nails have the carnivora ? What kind of clavicles have animals of this family? Is the form of their extremities the same in all animals of this class ? Flow is this family divided ? KT(Answered in the table.) What are the organic characters that distin- guish animals of the tribe of Plantigrada ? What distinguishes the Digiti. grada ? What is the form of the extremities of the Amphibia? 4. What is the zoological character of the Plantigrada 't 5. What are the habits of the Plantigrada ? What are the most remarka- ble genera of this tribe ? 50 _ GENUS OF BEARS. _ _ (Genera.) No well characterised carnivorous tooth in the upper") jaw, but a small one in the lower ja\v ; three larije ! tuberculous molars on each side, in each jaw ; tail } very short. J Two tuberculous teeth, pre- ^ ceded by three false molars; ± Rackoons. muzzle bhorl ; toes not palm ii rs; ± ate. J Very large in the "| upper, and small One large trenchant j in the lower jaw; „ , carnivorous tooth in j tail short; toes j 1!aager*' each jaw, followed by One tuber- -{ united by culous tooth row membrane. J Small in both jaws ; tail of me- \- Gluttons. Indium length. J 6. BEARS are large animals with stout bodies, thick extremi- ties and short tail; their gait is very dull, but they possess pro- digious strength and considerable intelligence. The formation of their extremities, little adapted for running, enables them to keep erect on their hind feet, and quickly climb trees, which they embrace between their paws. Some of them are also very good swimmers, and they are indebted for this quality, in a measure, to the quantity of fat with which their bodies are loaded. Of all the carnivora, their organization least requires them to feed on flesh, and their diet is least carnivorous ; in fact, the structure of their teeth, almost entirely tuberculous, is more favourable for grinding roots and fruits than for tearing and cutting flesh ; hence, they are omnivorous. They eat both animal and vegetable sub- stances ; but the last constitute their habitual food. They love roots and fruits, but have a most decided preference for honey, which they will seek in the midst of a hive without much regard- ing the sting of the bees, being protected by the hard skin and thick hair with which they are covered. 7. Most of the bears live in great forests, but there is one species that inhabits the coasts and ice of the polar seas. The ftjT( Answered in the table.) What is the arrangement of the teeth in the genus of Bears? What is the number of their molar teeth ? Are their car- nivorous teeth large? How are the teeth of Rackoons arranged ? Are their toes united by a membrane ? How many carnivorous teeth have they in each jaw ? How are the teeth of Badgers arranged ? Have they carnivorous teeth ? How many .tuberculous teeth have they ? Have they long tails ? Are they palmate ? In what respect do the t-eth of Gluttons differ from those of Badgers? Have Gluttons any tail ? 6. What are bears? Are they swift runners ? Do they swim well ? Can they climb? What do they feed on? What are they particularly fond of? 7. What are the habits of Bears ? How do they pass the winter ? GENUS OF BEARS. 51 first establish their abodes in caverns or in dens, which they dig with their strong and hooked nails ; in winter they sleep in their retreats, and when the cold is severe, pass the whole of this season in a profound lethargy. During the period of hibernation they take no nourishment, but seem to depend upon the fat, with which they abound in the autumn, for their existence ; so that when they leave their retreats they are extremely thin. Prudence is the chief feature in the character of the bear. Whenever he can, he retires from what he is unacquainted with, and when forced to approach it, he does so very slowly, and with great circumspection; yet he does not want courage, and does not seem to be susceptible of fear. He is never known to run; he opposes strength to strength, and when his life is threatened, or his young in danger, his fury and his efforts become terrible. The fur of these animals is thick and composed of long shining hair ; it is much sought, and forms an important article of com- merce. In the winter and in the coldest countries, it is most beautiful ; therefore, it is at this season they are most actively hunted. Most of the bear skins used are from the north of Russia and America. Since they have been employed- for making or adorning military caps, three or four thousand are annually con- sumed in France. Bears are found in all parts of the world, and in every latitude, except South Africa and Australia. There are several species, the chief of which are : 8. 1st. The Brown Bear — Ursus Arctos; it is this species that the mountebanks in France train for their exhibitions. This animal may attain a length of four or five feet ; his height, when standing on all his feet, does not exceed three feet : his hair, thick and tufted, except on the muzzle and paws where it is black, is chestnut brown on the shoulders, back, thighs, and legs; yellowish on the sides of the head, ears, and flanks. It is common in the Alps, and is found in all the high mountains and great forests of Europe ; it lives solitary, and ordinarily does not attack man ex- cept when provoked ; but then he becomes very formidable, and strives to crush his antagonist beneath his feet, or strangle him in the embrace of his paws. 9. 2d. The White Bear— Ursus Maritimus— (Plate 2. fig. 12.) is easily distinguished by his form and by the colour of his coat. 8. Describe the Brown Bear ? In what parts of the world is it found ? What are its habits ? 9. How do you distinguish the White Bear ? In what parts of the world is he found ? Upon what does he feed ? In what particular does the White Bear differ in his habits from all other bears ? How does the White Bear pass the winter ? 5* 52 R ACKQONS.— BADG ERS. He is low on his legs ; his body, his neck, and especially his head, are more elongated than in any other species of this genus ; lastly, the interior of his mouth is entirely black. This animal inhabits the glacial regions of the northern hemisphere ; it feeds on fishes, young amphibia, and young cetacea ; nevertheless, he is not essen- tially carnivorous, and can very well be brought to live on bread alone. He swims and dives with astonishing facility. White bears are sometimes met in numerous troops, which also distinguishes them from the other bears which are always solitary; but these animals resemble each other in requiring a retreat in winter. For this purpose they content themselves with some cleft in the rocks or even in a mass of ice ; and without preparing any bed, they there lie down, and permit themselves to be buried under enormous masses of ice ; they pass in this way the months of January and February in a true lethargy. 10. 3d. The Black Bear — Ursits Jlmericanus — lives in forests, feeds on fruits and flesh, is skilful in fishing, and dwells in the hollows of living trees. It is found in all the northern parts of America. In the Rocky Mountains and elevated regions of the Missouri, there is another species which is much larger, stronger, and fiercer : it is called the Grizzly Bear, and its fur which is greyish, is much esteemed. 11. The RACKOONS — Procyon, — very much resemble bears, ex- cept that they have a long tail ; they have very nearly the same habits as those animals, but are better climbers and more carnivo- rous ; they are of moderate size, and inhabit the forests of America. There is one species which is curious from its singular habit of never eating anything without previously plunging it into water. 12. The BADGERS — Meles — are nocturnal animals, having a cringing gait, a very short tail, the toes very much enveloped in the skin, and are particularly distinguished by having a pouch situate beneath the tail, from which exudes a fatty, fcetid oil. The nails on their fore paws being very long, enables them to dig with great effect. Their hair is long and silky. 13. The common Badyer, — /)/ < Sir? fa » S S. S3 J P n flu si-S-? 3 < 0. « V3 16. Are there any other characters by which the genera of the Digiti- grade animals may be distinguished 1 56 POLECATS. 17. The Digitigrades provided with a single tuberculous tooth in each'jaw, form A SMALL NATURAL GROUP, designated under the name of Vermiform Carnivora, on account of their long, lank body, and short legs. They have five toes on all the feet, and exhale an odour more or less strong, caused by a liquid which is secreted by two glands situated near the anus. Although of small stature, these animals are very sanguinary ; and from their lank form, they can pass through the smallest apertures ; they are divided, as we have already seen, into Polecats, Mullens, Skunks, and Otters. 18. The POLECATS, — Putorhis, — are the most sanguinary of all. Their head is round and the short muzzle extends be- yond the mouth ; the ears are rounded, and much wider than long ; the tongue is covered with rough papillae ; the coat is well furnished, shining and soft; their tail is long, and they have glands on each side of the anus which secrete a viscid and foetid matter. Their mode of life is solitary and nocturnal. They are found in both the old and new world. 19. The common Polecat, — Mustela Putorivs, — is brown with yellowish flanks and white spots on the head, and is from fifteen to eighteen inches in length, without including the tail, which is six inches long. It is the terror of hen-roosts and rabbit warrens. It approaches dwellings, mounts on the roofs, and establishes it- self in hay-lofts, in barns, and in places seldom visited, from which it goes forth only at night in search of its prey. It glides into poultry yards, mounts into dove-cots, where, without making as much noise as the Beech Marten, (Weasel,) it commits more havoc ; it cuts or crushes the heads of all the poultry, then carries them off one by one, and stores them away. If, as it often hap- pens, the animal cannot carry them off entire, on account of the hole by which he entered, being too small, he eats the brains and bears off the heads. It is also very fond of honey ; it attacks hives in winter, and forces the bees to abandon them. Pole- cats live on prey in towns, and on game in the country ; they establish themselves in rabbit-burrows, in clefts of rocks, in the trunks of hollow trees, from which they sally only at night to spread over the fields ; in the woods, they seek the nests of par- tridges, of larks, and quails ; they also climb trees to prey ; they 17. What is meant by vermiform carnivora? By what characters is this group distinguished ? 18. What is the character of the Polecats ? What is their mode of life? In what parts of the world are they found ? 19. What are the specific characters of the common Polecat? What are its habits ? On what does the common polecat feed ? FERRET.— WEASEL. 57 watch for rats, moles, and field-mice, and they wage a continual war against rabbits, who cannot escape, because they can readily enter their holes. The Polecat is found in all the temperate parts of Europe. 20. The Ferret — Mustela Furo — also belongs to the genus of the Polecats, and very much resembles the common polecat. Its coat is clear brown or yellowish ; its body is more elongated, more delicate, its head narrower, its muzzle more pointed than the polecat ; the female is smaller than the male. It is origin- ally from Barbary ; it is naturalized in Spain, but in France it is only met with domesticated, and is employed to hunt rabbits in their burrows. This animal, says Buffon, is naturally, the mortal enemy of the rabbit : when a rabbit, even dead, is shown to a young ferret that has never seen one, he throws himself upon it, and bites with fury ; if living, he seizes it by the neck or the nose and sucks its blood. When let into a rabbit-hole, it is muzzled, that it may not kill the rabbits at the bottom of the burrow, but only compel them to sally forth and be caught in a net with which it is usual to cover the entrance. 21. The Weasel — MrtslelaVulyaris, — is another species of the genus Polecat ; it is of a chestnut colour above, white below, in length about six inches, with an addition of fifteen or eighteen lines ior the tail. This animal is very common in temperate climates, and is terrible to hen-roosts, into which its small size enables it to in- sinuate itself through very narrow openings. When a Weasel enters a hen-roost, it does not attack the cocks or old hens, but selects the young hens and chicks, kills them by a simple wound inflicted on the head, and then carries them off one after the other ; it also breaks the eggs and sucks their contents with incredible avidity. In winter, it generally dwells in granaries or in barns, frequently remaining there till the spring, to give birth to its young, on the hay or straw ; during all this time it wages war, more suc- cessfully than a cat, against rats and mice, because they cannot escape, as it follows them into their holes ; it climbs, into dove- cots, and destroys pigeons, sparrows, &c. In the spring, it goes to some distance from habitations, particularly into low places, about mills, along the banks of streams and rivers, and conceals itself in thickets to surprise birds, and often establishes itself in the hollow of an old willow to bring forth its young. 20. What are the specific characters of the Ferret? To what part of the world did the Ferret originally belong? What are its habits? 21. What are the specific characters of the Weasel ? What are its habits ? In what part of the world is it found ? 58 MARTENS. 22. We will mention still another species of the genus Polecat, called the Ermine, — Mustela Erminea. Its body is about nine inches in length, and the tail about four. This little animal has two coats ; in winter, it is white with the tail tipped with black, and bears the name of Ermine ; during the spring, it is of a beau- tiful brown above, and yellowish white below, with the end of the tail always black: it is then the Roselet. It is found in the northern parts both of 'the old and new continent ; and though not so common as the Weasel in France, it is not rare. It seeks stony countries, and avoids the neighbourhood of habitations. The winter skins of this species are very much sought as fur, and form a very considerable article of commerce; but the Ermine of the most northern countries is most esteemed, because it is so brilliantly white, while that of temperate climates always retains a yellowish tint 23. The MARTENS, — Mu&tela, (the true Weasel) — properly so called, resemble the Polecats very much, but differ from them in having a muzzle more elongated, and a tongue covered with soft papillae. The numerous species of this genus are scattered over both continents ; among them we will mention : 24. The Commntt IMarteii, — Mustela Martex, — brown, with a yellow spot on the throat, and of a stature rather larger than that of the Beech Marten. It lives in the woods of northern Europe, avoiding inhabited places and the open fields ; it destroys a great many small quadrupeds and birds ; it takes possession of eggs, and climbs to the highest branches of trees to dislodge them. It is said to be found also in South America. 25. The Beech Marten,— Mmtela Foina— (Plate 2, fig. 16.) brown, with all the under part of the throat and neck whitish, about sixteen inches in length, besides the tail which measures eight. It is found in European forests, and often approaches habitations, where it even establishes its abode. But it is a dan- gerous guest : when it succeeds in obtaining an entrance into a hen-roost, or a pheasant- walk, it commences by putting every thing to death in its reach, and then bearing all off, piece by piece, to its retreat ; it is also voraciously fond of eggs ; it seizes rats, mice, moles and birds in their nests. It is also fond of honey and hempseed. 22. What is the Ermine? Where is it found? What are its habits? Of what colour is it ? Has climate any influence on the colour of its coat ? 23. How does the genus Marten differ from that of Polecats ? 24. What are the specific characters of the common Marten? What are its habits ? 25. What are the specific characters of the Beech Marten ? Where is it found ? What are its habits ? OTTERS. 59 26. The Sable Marten — Mmtcla Zibelina — resembles the pre- ceding species in size and colour. It differs from the other Martens in having hair growing on the under surface of the toes, which protects them from the cold. Its fur is a valuable article of commerce. It inhabits the most northern parts of Europe and Asia ; and abounds most in the mountains of frozen countries, the intense cold of which, renders them uninhabitable : as it is the winter coat that is most highly appreciated, the pursuit of the Sable is of all kinds of hunting the most arduous and perilous. 27. The Skunks — Mephitis — are celebrated for the intolerable stench which they diffuse to a great distance. Most of them in- habit America. 28. The OTTERS, — Lutra,— possess a peculiar physiognomy, which prevents them from, being confounded with any of the neighbouring genera. The head is large and compressed, the body squat, and tongue semi-aspirate ; their toes are armed with short nails, and are united in their whole length, by a wide and strong membrane, which renders these animals good swimmers ; the tail is flattened horizontally ; their coat is very thick, formed by two kinds of hairs, the silky quite long, stout, hard, shining, and thicker at the point than at the base ; the woolly, which are shorter, and generally more numerous, forming a thick and ex- tremely soft fur. These animals live chiefly upon fish, and in- habit bye places, or nooks, which they line with dry grass, on the banks, or in the neighbourhood of water ; they remain concealed during the day, and sally in search of food only at night. Some species are known in almost all parts of the world. 29. The Common Otter, — Lutra Vttlgaris, — about two feet long, tail about one foot in length, brown above, greyish below, and sometimes marked with white spots, lives on the margins of ponds and rivers, in different parts of Europe. 30. The Sea Otter — Mustria Lulris — is twice the size of the common Otter, and its black coat of the vivid brightness of velvet, forms one of the most precious of the furs. The English and the Russians hunt this animal in all the northern parts of the Pacific 26. How does the Sable differ from other Martens? Where is it found ? 27. For wh.it particular quality are Skunks distinguished? In what part of the world are they found ? 28. Wh it are the characters of the genus Otter ? What are the habits of animals of this genus ? 29. What are the specific characters of the common Otter ? 30. What are the specific characters of the Sea Otter? Where is the Sea Otter found? Does this animal contribute any thing to commerce? In what respect do the habits of this animal differ from those species of Ott rs ? 6 60 DOGS. Ocean, and annually convey a great number of skins to China and Japan. This species inhabits Kamtschatka, the most northern parts of America, and the neighbouring islands ; most generally it keeps on the sea coast, and not within reach of fresh water, like the other species. It is said to live in couples. 31. The SECOND GROUP OF DIGITIGRADE CARNIVORA, characterised by the existence of two tuberculous teeth behind the carnivorous tooth of the upper jaw, is composed of the least sanguinary ani- mals of this tribe ; they are of pretty large stature, but their courage does not correspond to their strength, and they most generally feed on carrion. 32. Amongst the genera of this group, the first that will be the object of our study, is the genus of Docs : it is composed of species which resemble each other in the principal parts of their organization, which, nevertheless, are separated into two very distinct sub-genera; DOGS and FOXES. 33. All these animals have three false molars above, and four below, and two tuberculous teeth behind each carnivorous tooth; their tongue is soft ; their fore-feet have five toes, and the hind ones, four; their nails are adapted for digging; their vision is excellent, their hearing fine and their sense of smell prodigious; they mix vegetable with their animal food, and are fond of putrid meat. Generally, they are animals of moderate stature, and their proportions are indicative of their strength and activity. 34. The sub-genus of DOGS PROPERLY so CALLED, is composed of common dogs, and different species of wolves ; it is distin- guished from that of the foxes by the tail, which in the latter is longer and more tufted ; by the form of the muzzle, and particu- larly by the disposition of the pupil. In dogs, as well as in other diurnal animals, this opening is circular, while in foxes it takes, when contracting under the influence of light, the form of a slit, a peculiarity which is characteristic of nocturnal animals. 35. The Domestic Doy, — Canis Famiiiaris — is. distinguished from other species of this genus by his recurved tail, otherwise varying infinitely in size, form, colour, and quality of hair. This 31. How are animals of the second group of Digitigrade Carnivora dLtin« guished? Are animals of this group vt ry courageous? 32. Do the species of the genus Dog resemble each other in their organi- zation ? How is this genus divided ? 33. Wh.it are the general characteristics of the genus Dog? 34. What animals compose the sub-genus of Dogs properly so called? How is this sub-genus distinguished from that of Foxes ? What peculiarity characterises noctuinal animals? 35. What are the specific characters of the Domestic Dog ? What signs indicate its age / DOGS. 61 animal is born with his eyes closed, and does not open them till the tenth or twelfth day. The female brings forth from six to seven, and sometimes twelve young at a birth. The life of the dog is commonly limited to fourteen or fifteen years ; though some have been known to live twenty years. Its age is known by the teeth becoming blunt, unequal and dark coloured, as the animal grows old ; when young, they are white, trenchant and pointed. 36. Dogs are voracious and gluttonous ; nevertheless, they can fast for a long time ; they readily accustom themselves to all kinds of food, although, they have a special fondness for meat, and particularly for carrion. Their stomach, which is endowed with great energy, digests very readily the hardest and most com- pact bones. 37. The dog runs with great rapidity for a long distance. The pores of his skin being very much closed, he never sweats, even in the very hottest weather ; but when he is very warm, he lolls out his tongue, and frequently draws it in ; he plunges into the water without being incommoded. He drinks by lapping, so that with his tongue, he lifts the water, which, being in this way in- troduced little by little, into the stomach, is gradually warmed, and he therefore experiences no inconvenience, by the sudden cold that a considerable quantity of water, swallowed at once, produces in the interior of the body when very warm. 38. The acuteness of the sense of smell, in some races of dogs, gives them a perception that is not to be found in any other species of animals, not even excepting man. This sagacity is par- ticularly manifested in the discovery and pursuit of game. The dog perceives the odorous traces with which the soil is impreg- nated, for twenty-four hours after game has passed over it, and in this way, guides himself to the cover where the animal hides. There are two principal races of dogs suited for- hunting, one of which is trained to pursue animals, and the other to stand at the place where they are discovered. 39. The dog is the most complete, and one of the most useful conquests that man has achieved over nature ; the whole species has become our property, and even the trace of his primitive state has been lost. Wild dogs, which are found in many countries, belong to the domestic races that have regained their indepen- 36. What is the food of dogs ? Have Dogs good digestive powers ? 37. Do Dogs perspire freely? Why do Dogs suffer no inconvenience from drinking cold water ? 38. Have Dogs a keen sense of smell ? How is this fact manifested ? 39. Is there any primitive race of Dogs ? 62 DOGS. dence, after having lost it for a certain number of generations, and in this way have resumed some of the traits of the primitive species. Causes as powerful as those which result from the in- fluence of difference of climate, of food, &c., are not enough to explain the numerous modifications that the domestic dog has undergone, giving rise to his different races. It has been sup- posed that our dogs have not been derived from a single species, but that they came from different species, which cannot now be recognised, on account of the mixture of their races. Some think the dog is a wolf, and others again, that he is a tamed Jackal ; dogs that have become wild, on desert islands, do not however, resem- ble either one or the other. Wild dogs, and those belonging to demi- civilized people, such as the nations of New Holland, have straight ears, which has led to the belief that the European races which approach nearest to the original type, are the Shepherd's Dog and Wolf-Dog. , 40. We will now mention the principal races of dogs that are scattered over the surface of the earth. Their almost infinite mixture, joined to the influence of climate, of food and education, has produced very many varieties in their species. 41. 1st. The Shepherd 's Dog, — Cauis Domestic***, — is of moderate size, the ears short and straight ; his whole body, with the exception of the muzzle, is covered with long hairs ; his colour is black, or dark brown. Of all the species of dogs, this one possesses most instinct for guarding flocks. 42. 2d. The L'ipland Dog, — Dog of the Esquimau?, — Canis Borealis, — resembles the Shepherd's dog, and inhabits the most northern parts of Europe, Asia, and America, where he is employed as a beast of burthen : they are geared from five to ten together, (sometimes more) to very light sledges, constructed of osier, and forced to run so rapidly, that they sometimes accom- plish in a single day, a journey on the ice of twenty-five leagues. 43. 3d. The Newfoundland Doa, — Cants Terra Naca::— The proportions of his body are nearly the same as those of the Shepherds Dog. His body is thickly covered with long soft hair, and his tail recurved and tufted. His colour is ordinarily white, with patches of black ; he is tall, and has an elongated body. He is very active and possesses strength superior to that of any other dogs of the same size. He attaches himself strongly to his master, but is shy of strangers. He is remarkable for 40. How do you account for the numerous varieties of Dogs? 41. What are the specific characters of the Shepherds Dog ? 42. How is the Lapland Dog employed ? 43. What a re the specific characters of the New foundland Dog ? For what is this Dog remarkable ? DOGS. • 63 his toes being united, for about one half their length by a mem- brane, and fdfr the facility with which he takes to the water, which seems to him a second element. This quality has caused him to be taken to places where men are in danger of being drowned, in order to rescue them. 44. 4th. The Wolf- Dog, — Cam's Pomeranus, — is distinguished from the Shepherd's Doy by the hairs that cover all parts of the head, and by his highly raised tail ; his colour is generally white, or black, or pale red : in some countries he is employed to watch the flocks. 45. 5th. The Hound, — Canis Gallicus: — There are several varieties remarkable for the length of their pendant ears ; they have strong limbs, short hair, taU recurved ; they are white, or black, or pale red, (fawn,) or spotted with these different colours. It is the best race for pursuing game, such as the hare, deer, or wild boar, £c. The Spanish pointer and setter belong to this variety. 46. 6th. The Turnspit,— Canis Vertagm: — In this race the legs are always very short, sometimes straight, and often crooked ; the ears are large, long and pendant. The Turnspits are prized for hunting in company with the Hound. 47. 7th. The Setting-Dog, — Canis Avicularis, — differs little from the preceding and the ordinary hound ; the muzzle is not so long, the ears are shorter, the limbs longer, and the body thicker. 48. 8th. The Terrier,— Canis 7 "errarius :— This race, of which they form packs in England for chasing the fox, hare, and rabbits, is black, having the eyes, the lower part of the body, and the paws of a deep yellowish red. It possesses a great deal of viva- city and intelligence, and great ardour in the chase ; it watches for mice, and catches them with as much adroitness as a cat. 49. 9th. The Spaniel, — Canis Extrarius, — is covered with long silky hair ; his ears are pendant like those of the hound, and his limbs short ; he is white or chestnut, or marked with these two colours, or black. It varies in size, and is valued in hunting ; as a watch dog, and as a companion. 50. 10th. The Grey-hound, — Cam'« Grains;— This animal possesses an elegant form, and was so much esteemed formerly, 44. How is the Wolf-Dog distinguished from the Shepherd's Dog ? 45. What are ihe specific characters of the Hound ? 46. For w>at is the Turnspit valued? 47. How does the Setting-Dog differ from the common Hound ? 48. What are the specific characters of the Terrier ? 49. What are the specific characters of the Spaniel ? For what is it valued ? 50. What are the specific characters of the Greyhound? Does the Grey- hound hunt, by the sense of smell like the common Hound? 6* 64 DOGS. that he was the ordinary companion of gentlemen, who in those days were distinguished by their charger, their falcon, and grey- hound. It has a long body, a long delicate head, large eyes, a long mouth, teeth sharp and very white, and a deep chest. Both his fore and hind legs are long and straight, his haunches round and strong, his loins brawny and his belly thin. He is the most nimble of all the dogs, and is fit for the chase from twelve months old. He hunts by the eye and not by the sense of smell, and it is pretended that he surpasses them all. 51. llth. The Danish Dog, — Canis Danicus, — This dog pos- sesses great beauty ; he is white and spotted with an elegant pro- fusion of small, round, black spots. His sense of smell is not acute. 52. 1 2th. The Mastiff,— Canis Mastivm ;— Dogs of this race are large, vigorous, and nimble ; their ears are demi-pendant. They are gray, white, brown and black. They carry the tail high. They are chiefly employed as watch-dogs. 53. 13th. The Water- Dog, — Canis rfqnaticus, — (Water Spaniel). This variety is one of the most intelligent and one of the most common in France. It is remarkable for its long curly hair ; its colour is black, or white, or mixed. These animals are strongly attached to their masters, and perform many curious tricks. They are very fond of going into the water. 54. 14th. The Bull- Dog, -Canis Moto