a ab Aide a tA Ga lye yy AY Lpeas Mii tasty stig fata Lat LAAT y a Et aba ‘ ‘ayn i NGEL PaO il : fit 4 Wh ty wt ae Ee eae a eet ee ») dit: vy ' Yaa A, " i iH "i TRA AD in at Parham bh ius Hh 24 RON Rear J PRE OLAS HTT { ’ Astana Hey Maa: an iy ’ \ | HWANG 3 Hi steph ’ j 4 ‘ VU Ae ay . y Heit Wein k “int PDN bt a SARS anti ali its ite ay oth i} ‘ yy ta lhP ie ray f ) ? HEED Ne i) itl \ 7 74 Ny f hay! BF nc } ’ ; \ TOE ay t Why i ; an i Lay H hie vee Hedy ote hh) if - : DOE NG hae tp i\ wits, Les yay Ven itave fa vg ythey lle beth } x art aya Mra i ‘ee or ny AL 2 va de, ROANAGRLUaR SR Ean RE ee Sui s Ms <3 sh Nee Gr engi is iy, se \s 3 if ; : Ras auites ; Li tah 4 Fea kb ; 44 . Yy Lig Yi Niipeatetkes Mens iong hades SO Mme Ne Md st ; ‘ th Binh eal at 4 Byvhde abut | “ie yh re ‘ dine ¥ SAM nh te . ' j 5 Mn, teak ; H wil, pdtytt, j seer ‘ : . Fuh wi iY r rah) $ t yt . nee Nite (et ata ¢ be " Heit Re Pee oat Yee Civic a sf es new eal f Cae } fA i j ate pe dety i pe ES SHUT ’ pekene ! eM Adige iy H ‘ ik i 4 Paes noe : aN be bay A eat eal ae. ered MLC Vd eRe ARNT at tit i tial " 4 1453 Aa Ty gra dpe Ai ees Pov tte 3 Ohad th heey vi iasy lads ; { 7 iiigtdnad yt ; rie 4 n ; i % } ar | ' eye y ee Ye ai wil ECHL PY ¢ ht : y ‘i WM nae te 7 PRCA tantdatian lea a Da Be a PTA be eat Aol diins Fra PREM GS La i Deon , : a Pa Beat) Rhea a aH i i “ 4 " Seni eat eae hay ' { yo c h tail Pal gt ht CPA MUR Late at Pe aa Poa ot v cM aN ba Paes ' a ean wert det MUR Tc Te Mere C0} $n 85 hasta gy 4 THE -ENTOMOLOGIST’S MONTHLY MAGAZINE: CONDUCTED BY C. G. BARRETT, F.ES. W. W. FOWLER, M.A., F.L.S. G. C. CHAMPION, F.Z.8. BR. McLACHLAN, F.R:S. J. W. DOUGLAS, F.ES. HK. SAUNDERS, F.LS. LORD WALSINGHAM, M.A., LL.D., F.RS., &c. HCO SHRI AS- VOL. Tv [VOL. XXIxX.] “Facts, if carefully and honestly recorded, cannot but prove of real value, sooner or later, in the solution of some of the many intricate questions arising out of the diffusion of animals and plants.”— Wollaston. LONDON: GURNEY & JACKSON (Mr. Vaw Voorsr’s Successors), 1, PATERNOSTER ROW. io}Seee 7a) 24 nor LONDON : NAPIER, PRINTER, SEYMOUR STREET, EUSTON SQUARE, N.W. MDCCCXCIII. 1 vszets THE ENTOMOLOGIST MONTHLY MAGAZINE. SECOND SERIES—VOL. IV. [VOLUME XXIX]. HENRY TIBBATS STAINTON, E.RS., &c. Henry Tibbats Stainton died at his residence, Mountsfield, Lewisham, on December 2nd, 1892, in his 71st year (he having been born on August 13th, 1822), after a lingering illness of many months’ duration, happily without pain, but attended with constantly increasing debility, and ending in utter prostration and collapse; yet he retained his mental faculties clear to the last. It is with the profoundest sorrow we announce this severance of a long friendship and association, in the one case enduring for 50, and in the other for 35, years: the more intimately he became known the more he was endeared by the sterling qualities of his character. Never of a robust constitution, he had on the whole fair health, although it was interrupted at times by tem- porary indisposition; his mental energy was great, he revelled in work, and was never more happy than when fully occupied. After being educated at home, and finally at King’s College, he was engaged for some years in commercial occupations, and thus acquired and confirmed the habits of accuracy of observation, method and punc- tuality which characterized him throughout his life. He had a deep conviction of the value of time, and up to the beginning of his last illness he exemplified his advice to others and used to rise at 5 o’clock in the morning, and thus much of the best of his study and work was done before breakfast. 2 (January, Naturally diffident and unobtrusive in society, he yet pursued the objects that interested him with ardour and perseverance, and his liberality in the cause of the advancement of entomological studies in Britain, which was always dear to him, and his unstinted aid in the identification of species, are too well known to require eulogy. From the first he restricted his researches to Lepidoptera, but he had sympathy with the students of all Orders of Insects, and of Natural History generally. Possessed of an ample fortune, he was conscious that “‘preperty has its duties as well as its rights,’ and he ~ used his means freely to assist any cause or person that he deemed to be deserving. He was one of those men who “do good by stealth and blush to find it fame,’ but much of his kindness was known only to himself and the recipients. He joined the Entomological Society of London in 1848, was one of the Secretaries in 1850—51, and President in 1881—82. He became a Fellow of the Linnean Society in 1859, cca for a short time, and Vice-President in 1883—85. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1867, and was on the Council in 1880—82. He was a Member of the Entomological Societies of France, Stettin and Italy, and Honorary Member of the Entomological Socie- ties of Belgium and Switzerland. He was also a Member of some of the minor Societies; among them the West Kent Natural History and Microscopical Society, in which he took a keen interest ; and on the Honorary List of the South London Entomological Society. _ He was one of the Secretaries of Section D (Biology) of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1864 and from 1867 to 1872 inclusive. In 1861 he became Secretary of the Ray Society at a critical period in its history, and by his business tact succeeded in rendering it flourishing ; he held the post until 1872; and he edited the work on the Larve of British Butterflies and Moths by the late Mr. Buckler, now in course of publication by the Society. In 1871 he was instrumental in founding the “ Zoological Record Association,” for the purpose of continuing the ‘“‘ Zoological Record,” which had been relinquished by Mr. Van Voorst, and largely through his liberality this indispensable publication appeared regularly under the auspices of the Association until 1886, when it was taken over by the Zoological Society of London. 1892.] 3 Articles and Notes from his pen abound in the various Natural History publications of his period, including amongst others :— “The Zoologist,” 1845—51, 1853—57. “The Transactions of the Entomological Society of London,” 1849, et seq. “The Entomologist’s Weekly Intelligencer,” 10 volumes, 1856—61 ; or iginated and edited by him. “The Entomologist’s Annual,” 20 volumes, 1855—74. Edited, and the articles on Micro-Lepidoptera written, by him. It is mainly a resumé of the additions made, during the respective years, to the Insect Fauna of Britain. “The Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine,” of which he was one of the founders, and continuously one of the Editors. Each of the volumes, except the last, contains contributions by him, 28 volumes, 1864—92; and during the whole of this period he rarely missed taking part in the making-up of each No., either at his own house, or at that of one or other of his colleagues. Only a few days before his death he looked over the revise of the No. for December, 1892, and detected an error in time for correction. His separate works are :— “An Attempt at a Systematic Catalogue of the British Tineide and Ptero- phoride,”’ 1 volume, 1849. “ A Supplementary Catalogue of the British Tineidee and Pterophoride,” 1 volume, 1851. “The Entomologist’s Companion,” 1852 and 1854. “Bibliotheca Stephensiana: A Catalogue of the Library of the late J. F. Stephens, Esq., F.L.S.,”” which was purchased by Mr. Stainton. 1 volume, 1853. “Tnsecta Britannica: Lepidoptera-Tineina,” 1 volume, 1854. The most strictly scientific of all his works. “ June: a Book for the Country in Summer Time,” 1 volume, 1856. «“ A Manual of British Butterflies and Moths,” 2 volumes, 1857, 1859. This is the only work containing descriptions and localities of ali the species, “ interspersed with readable matter,” and, from its concise and untechnical style, is the best book on the subject for beginners in collecting. “The Natural History of the Tineina,”’ 13 volumes, 1855—73. Illustrated by 8 coloured plates in each volume. He had the acknowledged assistance of Zeller, Douglas, and Frey, but the plan and elaboration of the work, which is printed in four languages (English, French, German, and Latin), were all his own. “The Tineina of Syria and Asia Minor,” 1 volume, 1864. “ British Butterflies and Moths,” an elementary volume, with 15 coloured plates, 1867. “The Tineina of Southern Europe,” 1 vl, 1869. “The Tineina of North America: by (the late) Dr. Brackenridge Clemens (being a collected edition of his writings on that group of Insects), with Notes by the Editor, H. T. Stainton,” 1 volume, 1872. He also compiled or edited two British Museum Catalogues, viz. :—“ Catalogue A 2 4 | January, of British Micro-Lepidoptera,” Sub-Div. Zineina. 1854: and “Catalogue of British Lepidoptera, by James Francis Stephens, F.L.S., second edition, edited by H. T. Stainton and Edwin Shepherd.” 1856. This extended to the end of the Pyralide. As his works show, Stainton’s attention was, year by year, more and more devoted to the Micro. Lepidoptera, and his facile knowledge of the French, German and Italian languages enabled him to utilize the stores of information respecting them contained in the works of continental authors. He collected with great assiduity, both in Britain and abroad, especially in the South of France, to which he made several journeys, obtaining thus a great many species in various stages of existence. He also visited on several occasions some of the most eminent of continental entomologists, had large and ccntinued corres- pondence with others, and eventually acquired a very extensive and valuable collection, which was available for the instruction of any one who desired to study it. The result of his rcscarches was a com- plete revision of the genera and species found in Britain, previously in a chaotic state, and many new species were described by him. Thus he made a revolution in the knowledge of our native Micro- Lepidoptera, and he did his work so well that, compared with what he accomplished, but little in his special line remains to be done. His experience and knowledge had made him a general referee in questions pertaining to his specialities. His more intimate friends suffer from a sense of void and remembrance of his geniality and striking indi- viduality. Now he rests from his unselfish labours. Though unconnected with his scientific career, and therefore not strictly within the scope of this memorial notice, it does not seem inappropriate to record the’great interest he took in the educa- tional and charitable institutions of the parish of Lewisham, and his large-hearted benevolence in connection therewith. In polities he was an energetic Liberal, but became a dissentient on the division in the party. In 1846 he married Isabel, the youngest daughter of Thomas Dunn, Esq., of Sheffield (who survives him), but had no family. She was his constant companion and help in all his undertakings, travels and excursions, and his devoted attendant during his long illness. He was buried in the family vault at Lewisham Old Church (St. Mary’s) on December 7th. J. W. Dovetas. R. McLacuuan. (393.] i A SYNOPSIS OF BRITISH PSYCHODIDA. BY THE REV. A. E. EATON, M.A., F.H.S. Psychodide are small Diptera, related to Chironomide and Culv- cide. ‘Chey are mostly densely hairy, and in aspect similar to Idzcro- Lepidoptera ; some of them, indeed, are clad with scales on parts of the wings, antenne, palpi, and legs. ‘he flies frequent situations suitable to the requirements of the larve, harbouring in herbage, on shrubs and trees, or on walls, and some of them are common on windows. Mud, damp sand, or moist sandy clay afford a nidus to many larve in wet or marshy situations; others reside in proximity to the sources of streamlets, or near water trickling through swamps and shady quagmires; others are partial to the banks of streams and watery ditches that are not stagnant, and to roadside spouts; a lew are peculiar to bogs. Rotting leaves, rotten turnips and potatoes, and other decaying substances, such as dead snails and cattle droppings, supply subsistence to several species found in gardens and along hedges. A few enjoy sewage matters, and resort to scullery drain- traps and outdoor domestic offices of an old-fashioned rural type. Phlebotomus, a foreign genus, native of southern climates in Europe, is a tiresome blood-sucker. The forty* British species treated of in the present synopsis have been carefully studied during the last two years in the west of England, chiefly in the county of Somerset. Much has yet to be learned respecting their geographical distribution. ‘he author is indebted for information under this head to the following entomolo- gists, whe entrusted him most kindly with their collections :—Mr. C. W. Dale, of Glanvilles Wootton, Dorset; Mr. G. H. Verrall, of Newmarket; and (for specimens collected in Scotland) Mr. J. J. P. X. King, of Glasgow. The Psychodid@ in the British Museum, named and arranged by the late Mr. F. Walker, and those in the Hope Museum, Oxford, in the absence of locality-records, are of little interest; and none of the collections examined (excepting, perhaps, Mr. Dale’s) contained indisputable type-specimens of species described by English authors. Synonymy, therefore, has had to be derived from descriptive literature entirely, illustrated in some measure by the actual application of names in the collections examined. The display of markings on the wings and legs of Psychodide largely BepaMEs pet ie direction from which light falls upon them, ts Web ; Lericoma, 31; ap igale, 6; TLrichomyia, 1; Syeor av,1. Of these, ithe ee single species of Jlomyia, £7 ichomyt0, and Sycorac, tive of Psychodu, and eight of #ericone (total 16) have been previously described. 6 ‘(January, — and on the nature of the background opposed to the specimen. This, in the first case, is because some of the wing-markings are due to bristling hair, brushed up as it were, on the nervures in particular regions, while others are produced by prostrate or appressed hairs. The bristling hair resembles that of Hydroptilide, a Vamily of the Trichoptera, excepting that the individual hairs in Psychodide appear ~ to be smooth, and not serrulate or roughened microscopically like those hairs in that other Family. In another respect—scales on some of the wing nervures—the g Ulomyia, and a few species of Pericoma, present analogy with certain representatives of the Serzcostomatida, another Family of the Zrichoptera. In preparing the Analytical Key to Groups, Genera, &e., and in the tabulation of species of Sections of Genera, characters apparently conducive to natural assemblage of species have been selected ; but Group IL had to be scheduled without reference to Phlebotomus, this genus being unrepresented in the collections to which access was ob- tained. In view of the author’s intention of travelling abroad before the manuscript and figures could be completed, the distinctive points of many of the species have been described in the tabulations more in detail than might have been deemed desirable under other circum- stances, with the object of securing, as far as possible, the main results of the investigation, in case anything might put a stop to the work. The supplementary matter is in an advanced stage of preparation. The tables have been revised and adjusted to the requirements of practical work up to the end of September, 1892. It is unfortunate that some of the leading clues are of a nature that demand the exercise of very close scrutiny on the part of the investigator; but tested repeatedly, they have hitherto always yielded accurate deter- minations of species—-supplying a desideratum. The most noteworthy points in wings are the inward destinations of the radial and postical nervures. Next in importance may be reckoned the position of the extremity of the wing, relative to the terminations of the cubital and prebrachial nervures, and the form of the wing’s apex; and then may be ranked the positions of the points of bifurcation of the radial and pobrachial nervures in relation to the wing as a whole, or to the ends of certain of the other nervures, or to one another. In certain species it is hardly possible to ascertain exactly where the radial aid postical nervures terminate towards the base of the wing, without removing the hair thereabouts, a line of hairs being liable to be mistaken for part of the radius, and making it appear to terminate in the subcosta, or else in the basal 1893.) a cell, at a point farther in than its real ending. The inward termina- tions of the postical and axillar nervures are also often concealed through the density of the hair. When that is the case, worn specimens may supply a ready solution of perplexities, or it may suffice to denude the under-surface of the wing in that region, and shift the specimen about in different directions towards the light during its examination. Denudation of wings is easily effected under a lens, while the specimen is on the pin, with the aid of a very narrow strip of kid leather cut to an attenuated point, finishing touches being given afterwards when the wing is detached, and lying upon smooth paper. Fine hedgehog’s bristles are useful at this stage. The wing can then be mounted between glass as an object for the microscope, and be placed in the cabinet for future reference. Wings of nearly all the species here described have been thus treated. As a standard of reference, the wing of a common species of Pericoma has been selected. Wine oF PERICOMA NUBILA. NERVURES :—1, media- stinal; 2, subcosta; 3, 3’, radius; 4, cubi- tus; 5, prebrachial ; 6, 6’, pobrachial; 7, postical; 8, anal; 9, axillar. Basan crenns:—A, an- terior; B, posterior. When more convenient, the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th nervures are desig- nated by adjectives—subcostal, &c. The nervure connecting the end of the inner margin with the extreme wing-roots hag no term applied to it; in Sycorax it is disconnected from the margin. The homologies attributed to the nervures are open to discussion. Compared with the wing of Ephemera (ef. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, ser. 2, Zool., vol. iii, pl. viii, 12a), that of Pericoma appears to lack the sector (unless the branch of the radius 3’ be reckoned a sector, as it might well be) ; and in place of two intercalaries between the anal and pobrachial nervures, Pericoma has a single nervure termed the postical. In the next place, on comparing the Analytical Key, given below, with Haliday’s tabulation of the genera (Walk., Ins. Brit. Dipt., iii, 254, step a a), a difference is noticeable in the use of the term cubitus or cubital. Haliday himself is not uniform in his appli- cation of this term: in his description of Psychoda (op. cit., p. 255) it is applied to the posterior of the two nervures intervening between 8 (January, the forked nervures; but in the analysis of Pericoma (op. cut. p- 256, step a a) it is employed to denote the anterior of the two simple nervures. The reason why, contrary to Haliday’s view, the cubitus is in the present Synopsis described as absent in genera of Group I, is because the anterior of the two simple nervures is much weaker than the posterior in the wing of Psychoda, and this weakness is here regarded as evidence of its liability to be sup- pressed. Again, the nervure above referred to in the explanation of the woodcut as nameless, is by Schiner, in his analysis of the genera (Dipt. Austr., 11, p. xxxi, step 5, Sycorax), reckoned to be a rudimentary axillar nervure. ‘This may be partly owing to the figures illustrating Sycorax in Walker’s Ins. Brit. Dipt., iii, pls. xxvi, 5a, and xxx, 1, failing to show the nervure termed axillar in the present Synopsis. The artist, in fact, no doubt working at a disadvantage, failed to represent the nervures that meet the posterior basal cell, with his usual exactitude. Little use is made of the term metatarsus. Bibliography is curtailed. Only useful figures and descriptions are cited in full detail: where such are wanting, nothing more than authorship and date of publication is noted after the name of a species. Brevity is further attained, and much needless repetition avoided under the head of Groups, Genera, &c., in the general text, by the method here employed of quoting in reverse order the numbered steps that lead to them in the Analyticai Key. Ds (To be continued). DRAGON-FLIES IN 1892. BY C. A. BRIGGS, F.E.S. A record of the species captured by my brother and myself during the past season will not, perhaps, be without interest, for either the year must have been an unusually good one, or the locality that we have chiefly worked must be a singularly prolific one. The spot in question is the Hut Pond, near Wisley, Surrey, and is situate on the main Portsmouth Road, between Cobham and Ripley. From round this pond we have, during the present year, taken eighteen species, and there are some three or four species more, which we might tairly hope to take in another season. As the whole number of the British Odonata (not counting Sympetrum vulgatum) is but 46, seven of which are either casual visitors or of doubtful authenticity, this seems to be a large number of species to occur at one pond. We began (as recorded in Ent. Mo. Mag., new series, vol. iii, p. 199) by taking Symp. Fonscolombi, of which extremely rare species 1893.) 9 we eventually got seventeen, all gs, not one ? being taken or seen. The first twelve gs were taken on June 8th, the last two on the 17th. On the 10th, which, perhaps, was the hottest day of the whole year, we saw the ¢ fairly commonly, but only caught three, owing to a singular habit that we noticed on that day only, of settling on solitary rushes growing in the pond at some distance from the shore, and letting their wings droop. In this safe place they practically set us at defiance. I spent a long time wading atter them, but even when an occasional cloud was passing, whenever | nearly got within striking distance, they flew away, only to settle again a few yards off, when the process was repeated and continued. On the other days their habits were similar to those of S. striolatwm. 1 presume that there can be no doubt that these S. Honscolombit were part of an immigrant swarm, but there are two circumstances to which I should like to draw attention. First, the total absence of the ?: no doubt, as a rule, in this genus the ? is either much rarer, oris of more retired habits than the ¢; but still, if the ? had been there, I think that one at least must have been seen, if not taken, for we were specially on the look out for them. ‘he other point is, that the extremely early date would seem to show that they must have come trom a much warmer climate, possibly North Africa. Another good species taken was Hrythromma Naias, of which, at the latter end of the month, we caught three, and lost three more. A third local insect, so far as the South of England is concerned, was dschna juncea, two g and one 2 of which we took on September 17th (Ent. Mo. Mag., new series, i11, p. 268). The complete list of our captures at the Hut Pond is :—Platetrum depressum, common; Libellula quadrimaculata, common, var. prenubila, three specimens ; Orthetrum cancellatum, fairly common; Sympetrum Honscolombu, 17 6, strvolatum, common, scoticum, common; Anax formosus, one tuken, others seen; brachytron pratense, 1 §,1 9; Aischna juncea,2 8,1 + , cyanea, tarly common, grandis, tairly common; Calopteryx splendens, sparingly, evidently wandercrs; -Lestes sponsa, abundant; Platycnemis pennipes, sparingly ; Mnallayma cyathigerum, abundant ; Agrion puella ; Lschnura elegans, common; Lrythromma navas, a tew. Hive species, not including the sporadic S. flaveolum, might fairly be hoped tor another season, viz., Orthetrum ce@rulescens, Cordulia enea, Calopteryx virgo, Pyrrhosoma minium, and 2. tenellum. ‘Lhe last species, indeed, has been recorded from Weybridge, only some three miles oft, by Mr. McLachlan. On the banks of the Ouse, or “ New Cut,” near Kly, at a place where last year Sympetrum sanguimeum was tairly common this year | only saw one, but Agrion pulchellum was in abundance. At Bookham Common, Surrey, where last year S. striolatum and S. scoticum were common, and where I took one ¢? vulgatum, this year | only saw scolicum very sparingly. ‘L’his 1s strange, as at the Hut Pond scoézeum was common enough in ail stages of maturity, including the var. pallidistigma of Stephens. 55, Lincoln’s Inn Fields: November 17th, 1892. 10 (January, ACULEATE HYMENOPTERA IN 1892. BY THE REV. F. D. MORICE, M.A., F.E.S. I have had opportunities this year of collecting Aculeate Hy- menoptera in various parts of England. The season appears to have been a good one in most branches of entomology: 1 hardly think it has been so for my own favourites, the Aculeates. 1 have scarcely seen them anywhere in abundance, and several familiar kinds have not presented themselves at all; still, 1 have made some captures and observations, which may be worth putting on record. Passalecus monilicornis.—This seems to be a rare and local species. For the last three years I have been taking it, sparingly, in Rugby. ‘This year I obtained both sexes there in July; and in one case I caught the ? in the act of emerging from a hole under the bark of a live apple tree in a nursery garden. In the same garden, about the end of July, I was lucky enough to capture the rare Nysson trimaculatus, and I was also glad to meet with Hoplisus quadrifasciatus, both sexes, but especially the females, in considerable numbers, flying and running over a large strawberry bed ; they seemed to be preying on the ‘“ cuckoo-spit,” or some insect of that kind. I have seen the males at Rugby in previous years running over masses of gout weed (gopodium podagraria) in ditches, but had never been able to find their females. Crabro capitosus occurs now and then at Rugby, and I have taken some speci- mens this year. It is a rare species, a good deal like a small lewcostomus. I find it about the end of June in gate posts and palings. Spilomena troglodytes has occurred this year at Rugby, also burrowing in posts. So, too, in much greater numbers has Stigmus pendulus. I have found females of this species strangely infested with dcari. In one case the abdomen was entirely covered with these parasites, so that, to the naked eye, it appeared to be not black but testaceous all over; in another specimen Acari were hanging to the antenne, and remained there after the insect had passed through the cyanide bottle. Psen pallipes is common in most places, and this year, for the first time, I have found it common at Rugby. It has also, this year, had a very long season at Rugby, unless it is double brooded, for I found it there as early as May and as late as the 26th of September. Both this year and last I have seen at Rugby Prosopis communis issuing from holes in wooden palings. ‘his, I believe, is a somewhat unusual observation, so it may be worth recording. I have also seen a number of workers of Bombus muscorum going into and out of an apparently deep hole in the earth at the side of a large ditch. Unfortunately it did not occur to me to verify the observation by digging, but I feel sure that in this case the species had deviated from its usual habit of surface building. Similar observations have occasionally been made about other species, but I know of none such in the. case of muscorum, which has always been considered a most regular surface builder. I spent the first fortnight or so of April at Hastings. MNomada borealis 2 was fairly common in its usual haunts there; the males were all but over, even then, 1893. ] ; 11 Andrena fasciata, Trimmerana (var. spinigera), lapponica, &ec., occurred, but in no great abundance. At Guestling I took what I fondly hoped was a 2 of Osmia xanthomelana, but it proved to be only a pilicornis. After two or three days of splendid sunshine, which raised my hopes of splendid captures to an extravagant pitch, the weather broke up completely, and put an end to collecting for the re- mainder of my visit. : On August Ist I found myself at Deal, and throughout that month, as far as the weather would permit, I collected vigorously in that famous district. Andrena Hattorfiana (g and 2?) abounded in the direction of Kingsdown, but all the speci- mens taken were quite black. Nomada armata was not to be found, in spite of prolonged and careful search; the only species of that genus that appeared was jacobee. Nor could I come across Andrena cetii, though I obtained that species in the following month on Scabious near Chobham. I got a few females of Andrena simillima at Kingsdown; but, except HMattorfiana, no Andrena occurred in any quantity, and even of so common a kind as.fulvicrus I saw only a solitary male. By tar the most abundant bee that I found at Deal was Prosopis dilatata, a creature I have never met elsewhere. ‘he males seemed nearly over, but I may safely say that I could have taken the females by hundreds, and they seemed to visit all kinds of flowers indiscriminately. Other bees which 1 was glad to meet with in the same neighbourhood were Colletes picistigma (several males and one female), Osmia leucomelana (1 2), Megachile liyniseca (several fine specimens of both sexes, distinctly larger than maritima),and Megachile argentata (females only). Few Halicti appeared, and hardly any Sphecodes. Wasps were not abundant, but Odynerus trimarginatus turned up occasionally. Of the /ossores the best kind that occurred was Miscophus maritimus; I took one male and three females on the sandhills, and I believe they were not uncommon there, but they are most trouble- some to capture, and so restless, that they are out of sight almost before they are in it. I kept an anxious look out for Lachyles lativalvis, but only the common species occurred. Amongst my other Veal captures were Priocnemis obtusiventris and pusillus, Pompilus pectinipes (g and 2, the prothorax with rounded emargination in both), Ammophila lutaria, Mutilla rufipes, and Hedychrum ardens. From Deal I went over for a day to Folkestone, and there found, what I had not found at Deal, Tiphia femorata, § , pretty common on the wild carrot. Just as the season was closing I paid my first visit to another district, of which I hope to see more in another season ; this was Cannock Chase, a beautiful series of heathy downs close to Stafford. I had only one day there, and wind and rain interfered much with the expedition. However, I secured a worker of Bombus lapponicus, and some specimens of Colletes succincta and Andrena fuscipes, species which seem always to occur where heather abounds, and, so far as I have seen, there only. Generally in fuscipes the pubescence at the apex of the abdomen is very decumbent, but in these specimens it was so erect that I took them for simillima. Mr. Saunders, however, pronounces them to be fuscipes, and no doubt they are so. All that is known of the habits of the two species makes it unlikely that simillima should be foud visiting heather, while no bee is more devoted to that plant every- where than fuscipes. In conclusion, I may mention that I have taken two very curious colour-varieties of Lombus this year. One, in the spring, at Rugby—a terrestris, 2 (var. virginalis), 12 . danuary, so extraordinarily dark, that at first sight its species is hardly recognisable; the normal orange bands on the thorax and abdomen are reduced toa slender thread only just visible under a stronglens. My other curiosity is a lapidarius, 2 , from Hastings, with a distinct, and even conspicuous, brownish margin to the pubescence of the thorax in front and behind, and with the black of the abdomen also shading off into a similar brownish colour, which, in its turn, shades off into the red on the apical segments. So little variation has hitherto been recorded in the temales of lapidarius that it requires some faith to accept this as one; but all its structural characters seem to indicate that species, and to separate it from any other which its colouring might suggest. Rugby: October, 1892. NOTES ON THE EARLY STAGES OF COLIAS HYALE, L. BY F. W. HAWES. For the material enabling me to make the following descriptions, I am largely indebted to my friend Mr. H. Williams, who, as will be recorded in the “ Entomologist’’ of January, 1893, succeeded in bringing through two specimens of the imago out of a number of larve from ova laid in September by the captured female. The egg of C. Hyale, which is very similar to that of C. Hdusa, being perhaps a little fuller at the middle, is laid on various species of Trifolium and Medicago, doubtless singly in a natural state, although in clusters in confinement, and, by preference, on Medicago lupulina, It is worthy of notice that the egg of Hyale bears a curious likeness to the early forming flowers of this common plant, so that it is diffi- cult to distinguish any ova which may be laid on or near the flower head. The parent female of both Hdusa and Hyale appears to take full advantage of this likeness to lay clusters of eggs either on or very near to the yellow balls of blossom; in one case (of Hyale) as many as sixty-five ova being crowded on to the leaflets immediately surrounding one blossom. The egg hatches in about eight days, and the newly-emerged larva — appears of a unicolorous leaden hue, in reality, deep dull green. By an undeviating instinct, it finds out the centre of the leat, and takes up a position exactly along the midrib, and so positive is this habit, that it was no uncommon thing to find from four to six of these little larvee stretched out head to tail along the middle of one small clover leat. At this early period, without moving their hind claspers, they merely scoop out small portions of the leat (always on the upper-side), and as the lurve grow these attacks on the cuticle are «xtended until small holes :.ppear through the leaf. After the first moult, the head assumes a paler tint, and one 1893. J 13 characteristic feature of the full-grown larva is foreshadowed in the dense covering of downy hair, each hair springing from a wart or raised spot beneath the skin. The body gradually loses its dark look, and by the second moult the general colour corresponds very nearly with the food-plant, 7. ¢., a clover leaf. When examined under a microscope, the larva of Hyale reminds one in some respects of the larva of Anthocharis cardamines—the body green, shading off to a white side stripe, and covered very thickly with warts, each of which produces a single hair. There is, however, no clear design in the position of these warts, and they appear to vary in size and prominence ; the white line, moreover, is narrow when compared with the side stripe of cardamines larve, to the naked eye, however, these likenesses are not at all striking. The yellow spots below the white stripe are only faintly visible in this stage. After the next moult, z. e., the fourth and last skin, the larva attains to a length of rather more than one inch, and by those who have seen full grown larve of C. Hdusa would readily be mistaken for that of this species, were it not that the dense covering of short hair, and the extension of the orange spots adjoining the spiracles indicate a reliable distinction. Speaking concisely, the full-grown larva of C. Hyale is of a deep green, thickly covered with short hair, and having a white stripe running the length of the body above the spiracles. Adjacent to each of the spiracles, and prolonged so as to give the | appearance of a blotch, is an orange-yellow spot, and in some speci- mens these spots would seem to compose a broken line, hence probably the error frequently made in describing this larva as being “green, with four yellow stripes.” When full-fed, the iarva spins a few leaves loosely in the form of a tent or temporary covering, and fastening itself at the anal extremity to a convenient object, passes a silken cord over the back and changes in an upright position to a pupa after the manner of the larva of Gonepteryx rhamni. The pupa is almost identical in shape with that of Edusa, being perhaps a little less rounded, and not so bulging at the centre; green, whitish at the back, the wing-cases with several (generally six) dark spots at the hind-margin of the fore-wings ; there is also a dull brown mark on each side of the body below the wing- cases. In each of the two cases in which pupe were obtained the imago emerged in twelve days, on 22nd and 25th November. It may be well to note, by way of conclusion, that at the present time, December 20th, three of the surviving larve are attempting hibernation in that state. Grasmere, North Finchley, N. : December 20th, 1892. 14 5 (January, BLABOPHANES HERINGI AT PORTLAND: DISTINCT FROM B. FERRUGINELLA ?. BY N. M. RICHARDSON, B.A., F.E.S. When looking through the cabinet of my late lamented friend, Mr. Stainton, a year or two ago, I saw a short series (I think four specimens) of a Blabophanes, placed next to B. ferruginella, Hb., and labelled Heringi, with a query as to their being a distinct species, and on asking him about them, he professed himself unable to give a decided opinion as to whether they were so or not. The form of ferruginella that we take at Portland is very close to these specimens, and differs somewhat from the ferruginella which occurs about London and elsewhere, so far as I have seen it, so that _ if Hering? is entitled to specific rank, our Portland form should share the distinction. It has the fore-wing apparently broader towards the apex, but this arises from the fact that in the Portland specimens the anal angle of the fringe is pale ochreous, whereas in the ferruginella I have it is dark, which makes this part more striking to the eye when the moth is in a cabinet drawer, but if both forms are held up to the light, the difference in this respect is not so conspicuous, and as regards the wing itself, leaving out the fringes, I think that ferruginella is, if anything, narrower than the other. In this I am confirmed by Mr. Stainton, who, in a letter to me of December 19th, 1891, says, -as follows :—* Your Portland ferruginella do, indeed, seem to approximate to Heringi, in having broader anterior wings, and in well-marked spe- cimens a subapical dark spot on the costa, of which, in ordinary ferruginella, I see no trace. Whether Hering: is really a good species is a point on which I am still rather doubtful.” In the ferruginella which I have, I do not, as Mr. Stainton says, trace any dark subapical spot, but they are so dark altogether, that it appears to me that it might be merged in the general colour of the wing. Portland specimens are not nearly so handsome as ferruginella, and have by the side of them a somewhat washy appearance, looking rather as if they might be bad specimens of the latter species which had migrated there in a body for their health, but, under a magnifying power sufficient to show the separate scales distinctly, this appearance is seen to be due to the sprinkling over the face of the wing of a number of pale ochreous scales, the dark scales being also rather lighter than those of ferruginella. The inner marginal area is rather paler than in ferruginella, and as has been above mentioned, the fringes are pale ochreous, with a few dark scales at the apex, and a few here and there extending only as far as the middle of the fringe, which 1893.] 15 give an appearance of a dark line running through it parallel to the hind margin. The hind-wings are paler, and their fringes much paler, than those of my ferruginella. The body and legs are also paler, and the diaphanous spot has a tendency to be larger than in ferruginella. Without fuller information, it is difficult to pronounce this Port- land form, which we may call Hering, a good species, though considering the constancy of the characters above indicated (for I have never taken a dark ferruginella there, though Heringi is sometimes very common), we may certainly look upon it as constituting at least a well-marked local variety. This is what 1 should have been inclined to consider it, were it not for the fact that a very similar variety has been taken on the continent, and there considered worthy of elevation to the rank of a doubtful species, which leads me to question whether the Portland and German forms may not be derived from a common ancestor, inde- pendently of ferruginella, and not directly from the latter species, in which case it could not be looked upon as merely a constant local variety. T have in my series of ferruginella two specimens taken by Mr. Atmore in Norfolk, which also correspond with Hering?, but I have no further particulars of its occurrence in that neighbourhood. I should be glad of any information about these and other British Heringi or ferruginella, or about the German Heringi, which would be likely to throw any further light upon the subject, and I should be especially obliged to any one who would be kind enough to lend me any light forms of ferruginella, if such occur, either in conjunction with the dark form or not, for comparison with the Portland ones. This moth oceurs at Portland at the end of June and through July and part of August. I have one specimen, taken on October 7th, 1887, but this is my only autumn capture. Monte Video, near Weymouth : December 17th, 1892. On the pith for mounting minute insects.— At the last Meeting of the Entomol. Soc. Lond., Mr. Farren exhibited Nepticule mounted on pith, a practice universally in yogue on the continent for minute winged insects. From the appearance of the pith, I gathered it was that of elder, and was informed it was so. This pith is decidedly objectionable, as it invariably turns yellow in a short time. The best for the purpose is that of “Jerusalem Artichoke ” (Helianthus tuberosus). The stems of this plant are annual, and only the large, fully matured ones should be selected, 16 (Jam. ary, and then only those that have been allowed to remain uncut sometime after they are dead. The thick portions of these stems may then be dried by placing them, say on the top of a book-case in a room where the gas is in frequent use, and, if the outer woody portion is not attacked by beetles, they will last for years. The pith is beautifully white and firm, with an almost crystalline lustre, and very fine “ grain ;” it does not change colour by age, and holds the pins admirably. Mr. Stainton constantly used this pith, and certainly more than once advocated its merits in print. Agave pith, from which the Indian helmets are made, and with which boxes of foreign insects are often lined, might answer, but is certainly in no way to be compared with that of the Artichoke. Prepared sheets of it for study work, for placing insects on for examination, are admirable. It has been accused of corroding the points of the pins, and from this cause should be regarded with suspicion. Most certainly, boxes of Indian insects received by me, lined with this substance, have had the pins so corroded. But whether this was due to direct action of the pith itself, or to the moisture, inevitable in a tropical climate, absorbed by it, I cannot say. I say emphatically:—Use Artichoke Pith!—R. McLacnian, Lewisham: December 17th, 1892. A proposed revised List of Irish Lepidoptera.—As I propose at an early date publishing a revised list of Irish Lepidoptera, based on that published in the year 1868 by the late Edwin Birchall, Mr. Barrett having kindly promised to take charge of the section of the Wicro-Lepidoptera as before, I write to say that if any gentle- men can supplement my information as to Irish localities for any of the following species [ should be much indebted. I should ask localities to be particularized as nearly as may be, and to secure accuracy as much as possible, I only ask for records of personal captures :— Melitea Athalia. Esp., Lycena Agon, Bork., Hesperia sylvanus, Fab., H. linea, Fab., Sphinx ligustri, L., Sesia apiformis, L., S. myopeformis, Bork., S. tipuliformis, L., 8. euliciformis, L., S. scoliiformis, Hibn., Hepialus sylvinus, L., Nola cucullatella, L., N. strigula, W.V., Setina irrorella, L., Calligenia miniata, Forst., Lithosia aureola, Hiibn., Liparis chrysorrhea, L., L. auriflua, Fab., L. salicis, L., L. monacha, L., Trichiura crategi, L., Angerona prunaria, L., Hnnomos erosaria, W.V., Amphy- dasis prodromaria, W.V., Hemerophila abruptaria, Thun., Ephyra punetaria, L., Hyria auroraria, Gun., Asthena candidata, W.V., Acidalia rusticata, W.V., A. in- eanaria, Hiibn., A. fumata, Steph., Corycia temerata, W.V., Macaria notata, L.., Halia wavaria, L., Aspilates citraria, Hibn., Abraxas ulmata, Fab., Hybernia rupi- capraria, W.V., H. leucophearia,W.V., Larentia olivata,W.V., Emmelesia ericetata, Curt., Eupithecia succenturiata, L., E. subfulvata, Haw., Cerura bifida, Hiibn., C. Surcula, L., Notodonta trepida, Fab., N. dodonea, W.V., Cymatophora flavicornis, L., Acronycta tridens, W.V., A. aceris, L., Leucania pudorina, W.V., Nonagria despecta, Tr., Mamestra anceps, Hiibn., M. albicolon, Hiibn., Agrotis corticea, W.V., A. ripe, Hiibn., Teniocampa populeti, Fab., T. eruda, W.V., Orthosia ypsilon, W.V., Anchocelis litura, Lu., Hoporina croceago, W.V., Xanthia citrago, L., Cosmia affinis, L., Polia flavocincta, L., Hadena protea, W.V., H. chenopodiit, W.V., Cucullia verbasci, L., Brephos parthenias, L., Amphipyra pyramidea, L., Euclidia glyphiea, L.—W. F. pe V. Kays, Sloperton Lodge, Kingstown, Ireland: December, 1892. 1893.) ; : 17 Colias Edusa in December in the South of France.—It may perhaps be of interest to record that I observed a single example of C. Edusa, flying on the Promenade des Anglais, on December 1st. The morning was bright and warm for the time of the year. Vanessa Atalanta, of course, still disports itself in the sun. It occurs all the year round in fine weather.—F RANK Bromitow, Nice, S. France : December 5th, 1892. i Homoptera at Woking and Chobham.—In my list of rarer species observed in the above district (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxviii, p. 218), I recorded the occurrence of Pediopsis nassatus, Germ., and Deltocephalus oculatus, Sahlb. Mr. J. Edwards has been good enough to examine the specimens which I captured, and tells me that he does not think either of them is correctly named. The Pediopsis, although un- known to him, he says is certainly not nassatus, and as he has been so kind as to send me continental examples of that species to examine, I can quite endorse his Opinion. The Deltocephalus belongs to a very difficult group of that difficult genus whose species are ill-defined at the best, but at any rate, I think I had better for the present withdraw D. oculatus from the list of species inhabiting our Woking dis- trict.—_HDWARD SAUNDERS, St. Ann’s, Woking: December 14th, 1892. Coccide in the Lesser Antilles—The scale-insects of the Lesser Antilles seem to be almost entirely unknown, except from a very few recent records. Mr. C. A. Barber has lately sent me many interesting species from several of the islands, in- cluding several apparently new to science. Of the previously described species, the following may be put on record :— (1.) Antigua. Lecanium hemisphericum, Targ. (on Lranthemum) ; Chionaspis minor, Mask. (on Capsicum) ;~Mytilaspis citricola, Pack. (on Tangerine orange) ; Lecanium longulum, Dougl. (on pigeon peas) ; Lecanium olee, Bern. (on Ter- minalia, with an. sp. of Lecanium) ; Ischnaspis filiformis, Doug]. (on Sabal)._ (2.) Montserrat.— Asterodiaspis pustulans, Ckll., In. Inst. Jamaic., 1892, p. 143 (on pigeon peas and white oleander). ~ (8.) St. Kitts.—Vinsonia stellifera, Westw. (on Ardisia polycephala). —. D. A. Cockrrertt, Institute of Jamaica, Kingston, Jamaica: Nov. 29th, 1892. Coccids in Ants’ nests—In connection with the article on this subject, on p. 307 of the last volume of this Magazine, I may mention that a Lincoln head- gardener has informed me that he has observed a species of ant (presumably exotic) in his hothouses carrying Coccids from place to place, and establishing colonies, just as certain species of ant do with certain Aphides. As the owner of the garden has since died, 1 am afraid that it will be impossible now to identify the species ; the same gardener (Mr. Wipf, now of Hartsholme Hall, near Lincoln) tells me that he was on one occasion considerably troubled with Coccids, and, noticing a large number of wasps about, he taought they were attacking the grapes ; he found, however, that they were devourirg the Coccids, and that they did not attack the grapes before they had cleared them.—W,. W. Fowxuz, Lincoln: December 15th, 1892. 18 January, Otiorrhynchus suleatus, &.—This beetle has long been known as injurious to vines, strawberries, and sometimes to raspberries, and I have recorded the larve as having damaged maidenhair ferns by attacking the roots; this latter fact has lately been confirmed by gardeners in Lincoln, and they have also found injury done to the roots of Cyclamens by the larve, as well as to the leaves of Dracene, and to the leaves of peach trees in orchard houses by the perfect insects; in case of attack of larve the best remedy is to remove the surface soil, or, in the case of pot-plants, to re-pot, after carefully cleansing the roots; the perfect insects feed by night, and may then be captured in numbers by placing sheets under the vines, &c., and beating the branches.—Ip. Vote on Homaloplia ruricola, Fabr.—The black variety of this species is sup- posed to be much rarer than the ordinary form in Britain, but I doubt if this is really the case. I have not, however, had the good fortune to meet with the species here, but noticing it in the greatest profusion last year at Vernet, I bottled a large number of specimens, of which more than half were of the dark variety. At Vernet the insect frequented the Cistus flowers in the hottest sunshine, and appeared to be soon over. It is probable that it only lasts a short time here.—G. C. CHamPion, Horsell, Woking : December 12th, 1892. Note on Throscus carinifrons, de Bonv., and some other species of the genus.— Throseus carinifrons occurred in plenty to Mr. Saunders and myself by evening sweeping in this neighbourhood on June 27th last, and on mounting some of the specimens I noticed a character in the form of the prosternum by which the species differs considerably from the commoner 7’. dermestoides, Linn. ‘The prosternum in T. dermestoides is almost flat, with the marginal carina faint and obliterated an- teriorly ; in 7. carinifrons (as in T. obtusus), it is rather convex, with the marginal carina entire, and much more sharply defined. In Z. carinifrons it bears some scattered, fine, deep punctures on the anterior part, of which there is no trace in Z. dermestoides. The form of the prosternum is not noticed by de Bonyouloir. The genus Aulonothroscus, Horn, only differs from Z'kroseus in having a “ deep, sharply defined groove in the metasternum, beginning at the middle coxe, and slightly curving outwardly, terminating at the posterior angle of the metasternum ;” this groove being shallow and not sharply defined in Vhroscus. ‘This character also was overlooked by de Bonvouloir, at least three of his species—the North-American 7. punctatus and 7. constrictor, and the Australian 7. elongatus—belonging to Aulono- throscus. ‘The European species known to me all belong to Zhroscus. The genus Aulonothroseus is widely distributed in the New World, ranging from the United States to Brazil, and numerous species have already been referred to it by Dr. Horn.—Ib. Note on Dyschirius obscurus, Gyll.—Mr. F. Bates has recently submitted to me several examples of this doubtful British species for verification. They were found mixed with other Dyschirii in the late Dr. Boswell Syme’s collection, a por- tion of which has been acquired by Mr. Bates, and there can be little, if any, doubt of their British orig. Dr. Syme, as is well known, collected chiefly in Scotland. Unfortunately, none of the insects in his collection bear locality labels.—In. 1893. ] 1% Coleoptera at Fairlight during 1892.—I have devoted a good deal of my time this season to working the Fairlight portion of the Hastings district, and have met with a few very good species. ZLiwus algirus occurred to me this year for the first time at the same place where if. was taken by Mr. S. Stevens in 1848, and in numbers by Dr. Power in 1867. It was not at all common, but by continuous search- ing I managed to get a fair number of specimens. The time of appearance must be - very variable, as I took larve, pup, and imagos at the same time, late in September. I was not able to rear any of the larve, but the pups hatched out all right. ‘These pup were extremely active, moving up and down the interior of the thistle-stem quite rapidly. Each segment of the abdomen is furnished with a series of little hooks, and when the pup are alarmed the apex of the abdomen is pressed against the sides of the stem, and by a series of jerks, they work their way either up or down with great ease. I notice Canon Fowler, in his “ Hand-book,” says that the larger species of Zixus occur only singly in the stem; this is certainly not always the case with Z. algirus,as on one occasion I found three pup in a single stem, and several stems with two perfect insects. he species seems extremely lable to attacks from earwigs. JI found a number of immature specimens partially eaten by them, where the thistle-stem happened to be broken, so that they could enter freely. By beating dead wood, I secured a very nice series of Acalles roboris and A. turbatus ; a few specimens of Orchesia minor, Cis alni (1), Endomychus coccineus (1), and plenty of Lathridius angusticollis. On July 11th, I beat three specimens of Cissophagus hedere out of old ivy, but although I tried very hard for more, I only succeeded in getting one more speci- men on August 7th. Evening sweeping produced only Colon brunneum, Anisotoma calearata, and A. badia, Platytarsus echinatus, Liosomus oblongulus (1), and Phytobius 4-tuberculatus. In old refuse I found two specimens of Psewdopsis sulcata, one of which, un- fortunately, got destroyed on the cork of the collecting bottle. Agathidium rotund- atum (3) occurred in powdery fungi on a dead tree; Apion subulatum was not rare, on Lathyrus pratensis; and Sitones Waterhouse somewhat common under Lotus corniculatus— W. H. Bunnetrr, 11, George Street, Hastings: November, 1892. Apionide, fc., at Llantrissant, S. Wales, September, 1891.—Sweeping in a couple of fields near the G. W. Railway, about two miles from Llantrissant, produced the following species:—Apion seniculum, ervi, Gyllenhali, platalea, subu- latum, ebeninum, Spencei, vicinum, vicie, nigritarse, carduorum, and cruentatum. I may at the same time record from the same locality :—Phytobius velatus and leuco- gaster, Hypera suspiciosa, Erirhinus Nereis, and Hydronomus alismatis.—A. J. Cutty, 33, Queen’s Gate Gardens, S.W.: December 13th, 1892. Coleoptera at Craigellachie, N. B., September, 1892.—While spending a few days here in September, I took a pair of Agathidiwm rhinoceros in a fir stump. The male has the horn on the left mandible fairly well developed. Aphodius feetidus, Hylastes palliatus, Anthophagus testaceus,and Barynotus Schénherri occurred on the hills. M£gialia sabuleti, Chilopora rubicunda, Bembidium tibiale, prasinum, and paludosum, Tachypus pallipes, and Coccinella 5-punctata were to be found by the River Spey.—Ib. B2 20 (January, Hystrichopsylla obtusiceps, Ritsema, in Scotland.—While on a walk in the Altyre Woods, near Forres, N. B., I found a sick or dying mouse, and from it there fell on the path a gigantic flea. Compared with the mouse it was as if a man was attacked by a flea six inches long. Mr. Waterhouse kindly named it for me as Pulex talpe, from the British Museum collection. Chancing to-day to read Mr. Dale’s interesting note on p. 161 of this Magazine for 1890, I send this corroboration of his observation. There was upon the mouse another flea, small and light coloured, Typhlopsylla musculi, Dugés. The two fleas mounted side by side are a strange contrast.—ID. Mecostethus grossus, Linn., in Norfolk.—In the latter half of September of this year I spent a fortnight in the “ Broads” district of Norfolk, and, though not on an entomoloegical expedition, collected a few Orthoptera. My only notable cap- ture was a male specimen of WM. grossus, Linn., at Irstead, on September 10th, amongst tall rank grass close to the bank of the river Bure. I was disappointed at not: finding others, for though I searched the locality well on three days, I was no further successful. The last capture I know of in Britain of this species was one recorded from Co. Kerry, by the late Mr. H. N. Ridley, in a note to the Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. xx, p. 215, dated January 8th, 1884; but he did not give the date on which he took it, and called it “ Pachytylus cinerascens, ¥.” Thisspecimen I found in the British Museum collection, amongst several others of WM. grossus, Linn., which were at that time labelled, “ Locusta flavipes, Gmelin,” and Mr. Ridley’s mistake probably arose through his looking up L. flavipes, Gm., in Leopold Fiscber’s “ Orthoptera Europea,” or in Brunner v. Wattenwyl’s “ Prodromus,” and finding it given there as a synonym of P. einerascens, Fab., which is an error of these authors. Stenobothrus bicolor, Charp., and Gomphocerus maculatus, Thunb., I found fairly numerous on the sand dunes on the sea coast near Waxham; and St. elegans, Charp., was plentiful in the same locality. St. viridulus, Linn., occurred at the Staith, at the head of Hickling Broad.~Eianp Suaw, Wandsworth: Dec., 1892. Societies. CAMBRIDGE ENTOMOLOGICAL AND NaturaL History Society: November 11th, 1892. The following addition to Rule V was made :—“ That corresponding non-resi- dent Members be admitted into the Society, paying an annual subscription of 2/6.” Mr. Moss exhibited a specimen of Vanessa Atalanta, having a pale buff border on the under-side of the posterior-wings, of the same width as the usual red one on the upper-side. Mr. Wells, a variable series of Cerastis vaccinii from West Wick- ham. Mr. Rickard, a specimen of Plusia moneta, taken at Cambridge in 1890; a series of Ephestia Kiihniella, bred from a mill at Cambridge ; and some insects which he had found eating moths put into a box to relax: these were pronounced by Dr. Sharp to be larve of one of the Muscide. Myr. Jones, three varieties of Nemeophila plantaginis, one nearly black, they were all more or less crippled, and he gave as his opinion that the abnormal coloration and crippling arose from disease. Mr. Farren, long and variable series of Peronea variegana, hastiana, Schalleriana, comparana, and other Tortrices. ee 1893, | 21 November 25th. Mr. Bull exhibited a large box of Lepidoptera collected at Cambridge in July and August. Mr. Farren, some strongly marked specimens of Arctia lubricepeda bred from ova, both parents being var. radiata. My. Fitzroy, a series of Xanthia gilvago, and other Noctue, chiefly taken at Cambridge gas-lamps during September. Mr. Rickard, some beautiful varieties of Arctia lubricepeda, taken in a garden, and a pale variety of dbraxas grossulariata, and a specimen of Hpunda lutulenta, all from the district. Mr. G. H. Bryan, M.A., read a paper, “ Insect Hunting in the Riviera,” being an account of five weeks’ collecting from the 22nd of March last, with long lists of Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, &c., captured or observed, and many interesting notes on their habits Wm. Farren, Hon. Sec. LANCASHIRE AND CHErsHIRE ENntomonoaicaL Society: Dec. 12th, 1892.— Mr. 8. J. Capper, F.L.S., F.H.S., President, in the Chair. Mr. J. Lea, of Canning Street, was elected a Member of the Society. The President referred to the death of the veteran Entomologist, Mr. H. T. Stainton, and remarked that no one had done more to encourage the study of Entomology. Messrs. G. A. Harker and H. B. Jones gave a paper, entitled, “ Notes on a fortnight’s collecting in Galway,” the principal insects taken being Zygena Minos, Miana captiuncula, two specimens of the rare Triphena subsequa and Rho- daria sanguinalis, and exhibited specimens of, and pointed out differences between, English and Irish forms. The President exhibited large Irish Vanessa urtice. Mr. Gregson, a remarkably fine specimen of Prodelia testaceoides, Gn., bred from a larva taken in a market at Barnsley, and bred by Mr. George Rose. Mr. Stott, on behalf of Mr. H.S. Clarke, Sphinx convolvuli from the Isle of Man, and some fine varieties of Smerinthus tilie. Mr. Pierce, a specimen of Ceratocampa regalis. My. J. Her- bert Stott, Sirex gigas from a North Staffordshire coal mine.—F. N. Piprcr, Hon. Sec., 143, Smithdown Lane, Liverpool: December 1dth, 1892. Tue Sovutn Lonpon EntomotogicaL AND Naturan History Society: October 27th, 1892.—C. G. Barrett, Hsq., F.E.S., President, in the Chair. Mr. Hugh Main, of East Greenwich, was elected a Member. Mr. Bristowe exhibited Zygena trifoliz, Esp., intermediate between the normal form and the yellow variety, and a variety of Argynnis Paphia, L. Mr. R. Adkin showed Odonestis potatoria, L., bred from larve collected in Sussex, the series showing considerable variation. Mr. Barrett exhibited two specimens of Nonagria concolor, Gn., one taken in the Yaxley Fen district 30 or 40 years ago, and the other recently captured in a locality in the Midland Fen district, and forwarded by by Dr. F. D. Wheeler. Myr, Fenn, referring to the Hupithecia from Paisley, assigned to #. castigata, remarked that it had now been ascertained that the larva was a pine feeder, and, therefore, it could not be H. castigata. Mr. Tugwell said he understood that the specimens were found on pine trunks, but that the larva fed on heather, and he had this year reared the species on heather. November 10th.—The President in the Chair. Mr. R. South exhibited a portion of two broods of Coremia ferrugata, Clerck, and tyro broods of C. unidentaria, Haw., and read notes thereon. Mr. W. F. de V. 22 [January, Kane exhibited Stauropus fagi, L., taken in Ireland ; a damaged example ot Woto- donta bicolor, Hb., taken at a new locality ; a photograph of the pupa of Dianthecia Barrettii, Dbl., and said he felt certain from the structure of the pupa that it belonged to the Dianthecie; among other things in Mr. Kane’s box were some curious forms of Fidonia atomaria, Tr., Bryophila muralis, Forst., Boarmia cine- taria, Schiff., Cymatophora or, Fb., Xylophasia monoglypha, Hufn., densely blackish forms of Camptogramma bilineata, L., Hadena oleracea, L., and Agrotis lucernea, L. Some interesting notes were contributed by Mr. Kane upon his exhibits, and a discussion followed. Mr. Purdey, of Folkestone, among others, the banded form of Cidaria suffumata, Hb.; long series of Cidaria truncata, Hufn., reared from ova, and including some beautiful varieties; a specimen of Colias Hyale, L., taken at Folkestone in 1891; Peronea comariana, Zell.; and a long series of Hupithecia Stevensata. My. Mera, varieties of Lycena Icarus, Rott., L. bellargus, Rott., and Abraxas grossulariata, L. Mr. Oldham, a very dark specimen of Hadena oleracea. Mr. R. Adkin, Hypsipetes sordidata, Fb., and Melanippe fluctuata, L., and con- tributed notes. Mr. Herbert Williams, living larvee of Colias Hyale. Mr. Billups, the Dipteron Stratiomys potamida, Mg., and its rare Hymenopterous parasite Smicra sispes, Sp., both having been captured in the Plumstead Marshes.—H. W. Barker and A. SHort, Hon. Sees. EntomotogicaL Sociery or Lonpon: December 7th, 1892.— FREDERICK DuCane Gopmay, Esq., F.R.S., President, in the Chair. The President announced the death, on the 2nd December, of Mr. Henry T. Stainton, F.R.S., an ex-President of the Society. A vote of condolence with Mrs. Stainton was passed by the Meeting. Mr. Frank Bouskell, of 11, Lansdowne Road, Stoneygate, Leicester ; Mr. George C. Dennis, of Tower Street, York; Mr. Charles B. Headley, of Stoneygate Road, Leicester ; Mr. William Mansbridge, of Luther Place, Horsforth, near Leeds; and the Rev. George W. Taylor, of St. Barnabas, Victoria, British Columbia, were elected Fellows of the Society. Mr. Jenner Weir exhibited a species of 4dcrea from Sierra Leone, which Mr, Roland Trimen, who had examined the specimen, considered to be a remarkable variety of Telchinia Encedon, Linn. It was a very close mimic of Limnas Alcippus, the usual Western African form of Limnas Chrysippus. The upper wings of the specimen were rufous, and the lower white, as in the model, and the resemblance in other respects was heightened by the almost total suppression of the black spots in the dise of the upper wings, characteristic of the usual markings of 7. Encedon. Mr. F. J. Hanbury exhibited a remarkable variety of Lycena Adonis, caught in Kent this year, with only one large spot on the under-side of each upper wing, and the spots on the lower wings entirely replaced by suffused white patches. He also exhibited two specimens of Noctua xanthographa of a remarkably pale brownish- grey colour, approaching a dirty white, obtained in Essex in 1891; and a variety of Acronycta rumicis, also taken in Essex, with a beautiful dark hind margin to the fore-wings. Mr. H. J. Elwes exhibited a living specimen of a species of Conocephalus, a genus of Jocustide, several species of which, Mr. C. O. Waterhouse and Mr. MeLachilan stated, had been found alive in hothouses in this country. a ea 1893. ] ; 23 Dr. T. A. Chapman exhibited immature specimens of Teniocampa gracilis, T. gothica, T. populeti, T. munda, T. instabilis, and T. leucographa, which had been taken out of their cocoons in the autumn, with the object of showing the then state of development of the imagines. Mr. F. W. Frohawk exhibited a living specimen of the larva of Carterocephalus Palemon (Hesperia paniscus), hibernating on a species of grass which he believed to be Bromus asper. The Rev. Canon Fowler and Mr. H. Goss expressed their interest at seeing the larva of this local species, the imagines of which they had re- spectively collected in certain woods in Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire. Mr. Goss stated that the food-plants of the species were supposed to be Plantago major and Cynosurus cristatus, but that the larva might possibly feed on Bromus asper. Mr. C. G. Barrett exhibited a long series of remarkable melanic and other varieties of Boarmia repandata, bred by Mr. A. E. Hall from larve collected near Sheffield. Mr. W. Farren exhibited, and commented on, four varieties of Papilio Machaon from Wicken Fen; also a series of two or three species of Mepticule pinned on pith with the “ Minuten-Nadeln,” for the purpose of showing these pins. Canon Fowler exhibited specimens of Xyleborus perforans, Woll., which had been devastating the sugar-canes in the West Indies. Mr. C. O. Waterhouse stated that the larve had done great damage to beer-casks in India. Mr. HE. B. Poulton showed, by means of the oxy-hydrogen lantern, a number of slides of various larvae and pups, in illustration of his paper, read at the October Meeting, entitled, “ Further experiments upon the colour-relation between certain Lepidopterous larve and their surroundings.” He stated that he believed that nineteen out of twenty larve of Geometride possessed the power of colour adjust- ment. Mr. F. Merrifield, the Rev. J. Seymour St. John, and Mr. Jacoby took part in the discussiou which ensued. Mr. F. Merrifield read a paper, entitled, ‘The effects of temperature on the colouring of Pieris napi, Vanessa Atalanta, Chrysophanus Phleas, and Ephyra punctaria,’ and exhibited many specimens thus affected. In the cases of P. napi, C. Phlieas, and E. punctaria, he remarked that they corresponded with natural variations of these species in regions or seasons associated with similar temperatures ; and some curious effects produced by severe temperatures on I’, Atalanta seemed likely to throw light on the evolution of the complex markings of the Vanesse. Mr. Poulton, Dr. F. A. Dixey, Mr. Elwes, Mr. Jenner Weir, Mr. Tutt, and Mr. Frohawk took part in the discussion which ensued. Mr. Kenneth J. Morton communicated a paper, entitled, ‘“‘ Notes on Hydro- ptilide belonging to the European fauna, with descriptions of new species.” Mr. McLachlan made some remarks on the subject of this paper. Dr. T. A. Chapman read a paper, entitled, ‘On some neglected points in the structure of the pupa of Heterocerous Lepidoptera, and their probable value in classi- fication ; with some associated observations on larval prolegs.” Mr. Poulton, Mr. Tutt, Mr. Hampson, and Mr. Gahan took part in the discussion which ensued. Mr. J. Cosmo Melvill communicated a paper, entitled, “ Description of a new species of Butterfly of the genus Calinaga from Siam.” Mr. W. L. Distant communicated a paper, entitled, “Descriptions of new genera and species of Neotropical Rhynchota.’—H. Goss and W. W. Fowtsr, Hon. Secretarizs. 94, (January, ENTOMOLOGICAL NOTES FROM THE EASTERN ARCHIPELAGO. BY J. J. WALKER, B.N., F.L.S. We bade farewell to North-Western Australia on October 29th, 1891, leaving Port Darwin at sunrise on that day en route for Hong Kong, and, after several days spent in the survey of the “ Flinders Bank” and other coral patches situated on the edge of the hundred fathom line of soundings, we arrived at the remote and little-known Island of Damma, about 15U miles to the north-east of Timor, on the morning of November 6th. Anchoring in “ Koelewatte Bay,’ which, although to all appearance a very good harbour, is exposed to the full force of the easterly monsoon, and is much encumbered with coral reefs, we spent five days here very pleasantly. The aspect of the island is most picturesque, the bay in which we were lying being enclosed by volcanic hills of remarkable steepness and bold serrated outlines from 600 to 2000 feet in height, clothed, from high water mark (and even from below this, counting in the mangroves), with a dense, unbroken bright green forest vegetation, forming a most striking contrast to the low and arid Australian shores we had so lately left. The one exception to this general forest clothing was on the right-hand side of the harbour, where the fine volcanic peak, nearly 4000 feet in height, is wooded to only half that elevation, the top being bare, or covered only with low shrubs and grass. Smoke issues almost constantly from the terminal crater, and bright yellow patches of sulphur could be made out distinctly on the higher slopes. The steepness of the slopes of the volcano, and the dense and tangled character of the forest covering them, would appear to make the ascent a matter of considerable difficulty, and none of us mustered up sufficient energy to make the attempt, which, indeed, is rarely accom- plished by the natives, although they occasionally bring down small quantities of finely crystallized sulphur for export. All round the north shore of the bay, just above high-water mark, are innumerable little springs and trickles of pure but nearly boiling water, some of the larger ones being even utilized by the natives to cook their food. The island is scantily inhabited by a mixture of Malays and Papuans, who live in two or three small villages on the shores of the harbour, and appear to subsist chiefly on sago, fish and coco-nuts, though they also have pigs and fowls, and grow bananas and other fruits. There is at present no European residing on the island, the ‘“ Posthouder,” who is the representative of the Netherlands Government, being a Macassar half-caste; the island being under the jurisdiction cf the 1893. J . | 25 Resident of Amboyna, is visited by him annually, and the Dutch mail steamer which goes the rounds of the Aru, Ké, and other remote eastern islands, calls here for a few hours at intervals of about three months. I soon found that, although there was no lack of interesting in- sects in the forest, it was almost impossible to get about owing to the want of paths and the steep and rugged character of the hill sides, and I was very glad to find, at the head of the harbour, a considerable extent of nearly flat land, partly under cultivation, and partly swampy, with a dense growth of sago and coco-nut palms, while the rugged and rocky bed of a fine clear stream, which came down from the hills, enabled me to penetrate about a mile into the interior of the island, which is only ten miles long by about five in width. Butterflies were fairly plentiful, and I secured representatives of about 25 species, many of which bear a very close resemblance to those described and figured by Mr. Butler (Proc. Zool. Soc., 1883, pp. 365—3871, and plate 38) from Mr. H. O. Forbes’ captures in Timour-laut, about 200 miles to the eastward of Damma. This is especially the case with the species of Huplea and Danais, the most common and characteristic butterflies of the island. In this remote part of the far east I was much pleased to meet with Danais Plexippus (Archippus), a very large, light coloured 2 specimen ; Neptis aceris, or a species very similar to it, was not rare, and some very pretty little Lycenide were taken, chiefly along the course of the stream. Here, too, I saw several spe- cimens of a fine Papilio (apparently of the “Afgeus” group) and of a large light coloured Charazes, but unfortunately failed to secure a specimen of either. Coleoptera were fairly well represented, as I had the good luck to find two or three small clearings of various ages on the skirts of the forest, the dead and partially burned timber in which (although usually very dry) yielded an abundant harvest of small but interesting Nitidulide, Cossonide, Cucujide, Brenthide, Tenebrionide, &c., &c., under the loose bark, while two or three handsome Longicorns, and two large and exceedingly conspicuous species of Buprestide* were not uncommon, flying very actively in the hot sunshine and settling on logs and stumps, where they were not always easy to secure. A very fine and curious Staphylinid (Leptochirus sp.) was not rare in the damp fibrous débris left from sago washing on the banks of the stream. Brushing and beating foliage was not very productive, * Cyphogastra abdominalis, Waterh., and Pseudochrysodema (?) Walkeri, Waterh. (Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. [6], x, pp. 411. 412). Cc 96 : {[January, yielding only a few inconspicuous Curculionide, &ec. In the five days I managed to obtain by hard work about 110 species of Coleoptera, besides a fair assortment of other insects, a few nice land shells, &c. Birds were tolerably plentiful and variable, the most abundant being a large and very handsome fruit pigeon (Oarpophaga concinna, Wall.), the deep booming note of which was to be heard everywhere in the forest. A good many of these fine birds were shot by our sportsmen, and proved to be excellent eating ; their crops usually contained entire . nutmegs, which appear to grow wild in this island, as they are not cultivated here. Leaving Damma on the afternoon of the 11th, two days’ easy steaming through a sea smooth as glass brought us to Amboyna, and at 2 p.m. on the 13th we anchored off the town within a quarter of a mile of Fort “ Neuw Victoria.’’ Since I last set eyes on Tahiti, nearly nine years ago, I do not recall to mind a more perfectly beautiful piece of thoroughly tropical scenery than is presented by the noble harbour of Amboyna. It is a deep-water inlet some fifteen miles in length, with an average width of one to two miles, enclosed by rugged but not precipitous hills of ancient voleanie rock, which attain an . extreme elevation of 4000 feet, and are everywhere clothed (except where the land has been cleared) with a splendid forest growth, es- pecially dense and luxuriant on the northern side opposite the town. All round the harbour the lower land, which consists almost entirely of upheaved coral rock, is occupied by a nearly continuous belt of coco-nut and nutmeg plantations, and groves of fruit trees in which the town is in great part concealed ; and looking towards its upper extremity, the view is bounded in that direction by a distant glimpse of the lofty and rugged mountains in the great Island of Ceram. We remained here until the morning of the 17th, the time being fully occupied in coaling, giving leave to the ship’s company, and making magnetic and other observations. The Resident and the Dutch Officials stationed here vied with each other in showing us the utmost kindness and hospitality, an experience which was repeated at Ternaté. After the lapse of more than thirty years, it is pleasing to find that the memory of Dr. Wallace’s residence in these islands is not forgotten, and the Dutch translation of the “ Malay Archipelago ”’ is as highly appreciated in the lands of which he gives us so vivid a picture, as the original work is at home. In this renowned locality 1 was naturally anxious to make the most of the time at my disposal, and as the weather was fortunately all that could be desired (November being the finest and driest month 1893.) | Dra in the year at Amboyna), my success, in Lepidoptera at least, was very good, exceeding anything which I had done in past years, even in the productive regions of Central America and the Isthmus of Panama, During the five days of our stay, I caught and set out representa- tives of more than 100 species of butterflies, upwards of 60 being taken in a single day’s work. Nothing can be more enjoyable to the Entomologist than a stroll, net in hand, along the well-kept roads, which extend in every direction from the town, and through the shady and fragrant nutmeg plantations and patches of woodland on either hand, in which large and showy butterflies are so abundant as to form quite a feature in the scene. At the outset I was a little disappointed in not meeting with any of the grand Ornithoptera’s for which Amboyna is so famous, and indeed, I saw one specimen only of this genus, a splendid ¢ of O. Remus, hopelessly out of reach. Some half-dozen species of Papilio were fairly common, and among them the most conspicuous was the magnificent blue P. Ulysses, L., of which I saw at least a dozen specimens during my stay, but succeeded in capturing three only in good condition. It isa glorious sight to see this noble insect ‘‘at home,” looking, except for the tailed wings and more sailing flight, very like one of the great blue American Morpho’s, e. g., M. Peleides, &e. Though at first sight he seems by no means difficult to eatch, he is as wily as his namesake of old, and appears to know exactly the length of reach of the net, and keeps just outside the line of danger. Another insect which pleased me very much was the large white and black “spectre butterfly,” Hestia Idea, found locally in dense woodland about five miles from the town. No but- terfly with which I am acquainted has such a slow, weak, and wavering flight, and, in fact, at a little distance, it looks more like a conjurer’s butterfly cut out of a piece of newspaper than a real living insect! The Danaide were represented by several other fine and handsome species, and D. Pleaippus (large and richly coloured, with the apex of the fore-wings more produced than in any specimens which I have ever seen before) was common in open waste places, where its usual food-plant, Asclepias cwrassavica, grows freely, and appears to be com- pletely naturalized. Several very fine species of Huplea (one mag- nificent blue-glossed fellow being over five inches in expanse of wings) were more or less plentiful in shady spots; and in the darker and more tangled portions of the forest, a most conspicuous butterfly was the large Drusilla Urania?, which flapped about heavily among the. brushwood, frequently settling on leaves and displaying the beautifully ocellated under-surface. In similar situations, along with Melanitis, 28 (January, 1893. Mycalesis, and other interesting Satyride, a fine species of Parthenos occurred not rarely, but was almost always worn and torn, and by no means easy to catch. Sunny openings and paths in the nutmeg groves and thickets swarmed with interesting butterflies ; the magni- ficent Diadema Pandarus occurred once only, with three or four other species of this fine genus; while Cynthia, Messaras, Precis, Neptis, Cethosia (the gorgeous red and black O. Cydippe, L., being most con- spicuous), Laogona, Elymnias, Delias, Callidryas, Hypochrysops, Lycena (some very beautiful species), Pamphila, and many other genera, were more or less copiously represented. Among the numerous handsome day-flying moths which were met with almost everywhere, the finest and most conspicuous was Alezdis Orontes, L., which appears to fly most freely about 4 p.m.,and has very much the look of a fine Papzlio on the wing. The equally large and handsome, but more soberly coloured Wyctalemon Patroclus was also found, but more rarely, in dark shady places. The Coleoptera, to my great disappointment, I found to be as . scarce and inconspicuous as the Lepidoptera were abundant and fine; had I been able to get right away into the forest, where new clearings _ were being made, I should no doubt have done very much better, but the only clearing within walking distance, although fairly extensive, was very old and dry, and yielded only a few Rhynchophora, &c., one fine species of this group, with exceedingly long legs and rostrum, being common enough on the felled timber, but very hard to catch, as it took to wing with the readiness of a fly. I took only one Longi- corn (a beautiful dark blue species spotted with white), and did not even see a single Buprestis! The only beetles that I found at all commonly were an Opatrum? and a pretty spotted Crcindela, both of which occurred freely in the roads and pathways. On the rocky banks of a fine clear stream, which formed one of my best collecting-grounds, a beautiful dark bronzy species of Therates (Cicindelide), with enor- mously developed bright yellow labrum and mandibles, was not rare, running rapidly over foliage and taking to wing with great readiness. Hemiptera (with the exception of Cicade, which were abundant and extremely noisy) appeared to be almost as scarce as Coleoptera, but I took the largest and finest, and I may add, the most powerfully scented example of the Order which I have ever met with: a huge brown and ochreous-yellow insect, an inch and a half long, allied to Pentatoma, but with largely developed hind-legs. Flowers in open spaces attracted large numbers of fine and handsome wasps, hornets, Scolia, Xylocope, and other Hymenoptera, which, next to the Lepidoptera, February, 1893: | ; ‘ 29 appeared to me to be the Order of insects best represented in Amboyna at the time I was there. Land shells were decidedly scarce, and of the fine and handsome sea-shells for which Amboyna is so renowned, very few came in my way, those which were brought alongside the ship by native dealers being of common species scarcely worth pur- chasing at any price. Leaving with regret this most charming and interesting island at daybreak on the 18th, we crossed the equator in long. 127° east at 4. a.m. on the 21st, on which day I took several examples of the finest and largest species of the pelagic Hemipteron, Halobates, which I have ever met with; and at 7 a.m. on the 22nd we anchored in the roadstead of Ternaté, The magnificent tropical scenery of Amboyna must yield to that of Ternaté, which is altogether of a more bold and striking character, while possessing equal luxuriance of vegetation. The neat little town, almost hidden in dense groves of palms and fruit trees (the mango tree here attaining to a truly gigantic size), stretches along the shore for about a mile, and immediately behind it rises the great volcano to a height of about 5200 feet; at first with a gentle slope, and afterwards more steeply, the whole eastern side being seamed with deep radiating gullies, and covered, except towards the summit, with dense forest, cleared only in a few small patches. From the anchorage the summit is somewhat dome-shaped, and on the right hand side the terminal crater can just be seen, emitting a steady stream of white smoke. The ascent can be made within one day, and was accomplished by two of our officers, a feat to which I did not feel quite equal. Looking across the water to the eastward the view is bounded in that direction by the long forest-clad mountain ridges of Gilolo, which are terminated to the northward in a group of three lofty volcanic cones; but by far the most conspicuous and beautiful feature in the scene is the Peak of Tidoré, a volcanic cone of the most perfect symmetry of outline, surpassing in that ‘respect even the greatly admired form of A‘tna, though scarcely, if at all, exceeding the voleano of Termaté in elevation, its clear sharp figure, acutely pointed summit, and complete isolation, cause it to appear much _ higher. It has been quiescent for a very long period, and, like Ternaté, is wooded almost to the top. During the three days of our stay here the weather was de- lightfully fine, although very hot, and I made the most of the time at my disposal for collecting. Although butterflies were not represented by quite so many species as at Amboyna, they were equally abundant as individuals, and included several fine and handsome kinds which I had not before met with. I did not go far up the mountain side, D 30 [February, confining my walks chiefly to the shady paths among the nutmeg gardens, groves of fruit trees, and small patches of wood which, as at Amboyna, extend from the shore for about a mile inland. The nutmeg appears to thrive here to perfection, and is a very handsome little» round-headed tree, rarely exceeding 25 or 30 feet in height, with smooth bark and glossy, ovate, somewhat laurel-like leaves. Coffee | and cacao are also cultivated to a small extent, as well as sugar cane, rice, &e., &e. Among my numerous captures were two fine species of the yellow group of Ornithoptera, which were often enough seen but rarely con- descended to come within reach of the net. Four or five handsome species of Papilio were more or less common, and an equal number of species of Danais, including D. Archippus not rarely (its usual food- plant being common), and a form of D.. Chrysippus, were, with two or three species of Callidryas, the most characteristic butterflies of the. more open places. Shady paths and thickets produced some beautiful Lycende and Satyride (Ypthima, &e.), as well as an exceedingly pretty dark brown and white species of Cyrestis commonly, Rhinopalpa Sabina ? (rare), Messaras, a fine species of Precis, Huplea, one species only, &c., &e. Coleoptera were much more plentiful than at Amboyna, some nice little Longicorns (Gnoma, &c.), Erotylide, Languriide, Khynchophora, &c., being obtained by beating the dead leaves remaining on felled trees, the bark of which produced a few fine Carabide, Hete- romera, Passalide, &. On the flower spathe (¢) of a sugar palm ) 0) .2eutesdaser oe cee eee a — Fringe of the wing’s apex whitish or cream colour; that of the posterior. margin dark, with a patch of white in at least one place. Wing, ovate, or elongate-ovate, subacute. soo... .en = oaseeretinessasesieeeeetasee ere eee mor 2— (1) Posterior branch of the pobrachial nervure linked by a perpendicular cross veinlet to the stem near its abrupt inner extremity. Legs dark coloured, with light coloured hair at the apical margins of the tibia and of the fommbshof the tarsus | ssqsaq/ se scta-oeeeer sob -edeseeete as -—F. C. Apams, 68, St. Ermin’s Mansions, 8.W.: May 6th, 1893. Coleoptera at Tenterden, Kent.—On July 19th last I was at Tenterden, and having about an hour to spare, I looked about for Coleoptera. Unfortunately, I had no collecting apparatus with me except a newspaper, or I might have got more. On the flowers of Umbellifere, Anaspis subtestacea, thoracica and ruficollis were com- mon, and Mordella fasciata (2), Malachius ruficollis (1), Mordellistena pumila and humeralis (1), and plenty of Anthrenus museorum, were found under the same conditions. Beating aquatic plants in the water produced nothing but a single specimen of Donacia dentipes and plenty of Galeruca lineola. Gymnetron noctis was not uncommon in flowers of Linaria vulgaris, and a few specimens of Anobium fulvicorne occurred with Priobiwm on old hop poles. Out of an old willow tree I got a nice specimen of Phleotrya Stephensi. I suppose I was too late for this species, as I found a good many elytra in old burrows in the willows.—W. H. Beynerr, 11, George Strect, Hastings: May, 1803. N 142 (June, Coleoptera near Eastbourne.—Last August I had a day’s collecting near the mouth of the Cuckmere and on the hills round Eastbourne. The following were the best of the Coleoptera taken :—Bledius tricornis (common), and its attendant, Dyschirius salinus, Bembidium saxatile (1), Dichirotrichus obsoletus and pubescens, Ocypus ater, Aphodius nitidulus (in plenty), Mordellistena pumila, and Syncalypta hirsuta. Thistles produced Ceuthorhynchus litura and trimaculatus, Ceuthorhynchi- deus spinosus, and Apion carduorum. A single specimen of Homaloplia ruricola was also taken, floating in a pool of brackish water; and the following weevils by grubbing or sweeping at the roots of grass: — Trachyphleus squamulatus (2), Orthochates setiger,Gymnetron noctis, Apion eneum,radiolus,rufirostre and ebeninum, and Bruchus cistt.—Ip. Cissophagus hedere at Fairlight.—In « previous number I have recorded the capture of three specimens of this rare species by beating in the summer of 1892. I am now able to supplement that record, as I have lately taken the species in some numbers at the same locality, from its burrows in the ivy. In all I have seen a good number of plants attacked by the insect, but they appear only to occur in very small numbers; and a great deal of work is required to get even a fair number of specimens.—Ip. Rhopalomesites Tardii in the Hastings district.—I haye much pleasure in recording this species from old holly at Fairlight in numbers. So far I have only found it in one tree, but I have never looked for it here before, as I did not dream of its occurrence in the south-east of England.—Ib. Coleoptera at Thurso, 1892.—A few notes from this Ultima Thule of the British mainland may rot be uninteresting, particularly from a neighbourhood rendered so historical by the natural history investigations of Robert Dick. The month of August and beginning of September proved much better in the way of weather than the preceding months in England, yet insects were scarce. The coast of this part of Caithness is for the most part very precipitous, the old red sandstone strata, here nearly horizontal, forming a series of magnificent headlands. Beautiful little bays occur at intervals, with sand dunes and rabbit warrens. I worked chiefly the east and west shores from Thurso, the sandhills of Castletown, and the little tarns on the bold headlands of Holborn and Dunnet. I am sorry to say I neglected the inland country, which consists chiefly of a vast elevated bog. I will take the shores first. Between Thurso and its picturesque port of Scrabster I took under stones Otiorhynchus blandus not uncommonly, and O. ovatus commonly, Barynotus Schinherri (2), Bembidium atroceruleum, Tachinus pallipes and Jlaticollis, these were by far the commonest Tachini met with; Stenus guttula, Ocypus morio, cupreus and brunnipes ; Quedius umbrinus, Cafius cantholoma, Othius melanocephalus (common); many common species of Omalium and Tachyporus. On the eastern shore a few common species of Anchomenus, Pterostichus, Lathrobium, and Philonthus, and some Otiorhynchus blandus. Along the top of the cliffs, be- tween Thurso and Scrabster, is a fine walk, from which grand views of Orkney may be obtained. This walk is separated from the adjoining cultivated fields by rows of Caithness flags, placed end to end. On fine warm days these proved to be one of my best collecting grounds. One day Micropeplus porcatus and Ceuthorhynchus 1893.] ; 1438 contractus swaymed on them; I also took Sitones flavescens, Quedius semieneus, Hylurgus piniperda, and one specimen of Silpha opaca, and numerous small species from the same flags. The stones near the high road, at the base of Scrabster Cliffs (great deposits of boulder clay), yielded one specimen (imperfect) of Corymbites cupreus, and a specimen of Tropiphorus mercurialis. The Tarns.—A little shallow tarn on Holborn Head, near a farm house, yielded a great many common things, but which it may be interesting to note from this extreme northern locality. On floating leaves of Potamogeton, Donacia bidens was abundant. At the edges, and in the little becks near, Hlaphrus cupreus, Parnus prolifericornis, Limnebius truncatellus, and Anacena limbata occurred, some of them very commonly. In the tarn itself, Agabus bipustulatus, chalconotus, nebu- losus; Hydroporus planus, erythrocephalus, palustris ; Colymbetes fuscus and exo- letus ; Agabus guttatus occurred in great abundance under stones in almost every stream, even when nearly dry. Aspecimen of Necrophorus ruspator was taken under a dead bird. In some larger tarns just under the lighthouse at Dunnet Head, I took, in addition to many of the others, Agabus arcticus, Acilius sulcatus, Hydro- porus vittula, nigrita, melanocephalus, and one specimen of Caelambus novemlineatus, also Hydroporus memnonius, and Gyllenhali, with two or three specimens of Helophorus eneipennis. The sandhills at Castletown yielded very little, the season being evidently too late. Imperfect specimens of Serica brunnea were abundant. Calathus mollis swarmed under prostrate ragwort leaves. On small thistles Otiorhynchus atroapterus was not uncommon. A few specimens of Bledius arenarius, and a fragment of Broscus, were all that rewarded a couple of hours’ search. In the town of Thurso I obtained a second specimen (damaged) of Silpha opaca, and single specimens of Otiorhynchus sulcatus and picipes, Barynotus Schénherri, and in my lodging, Pris- tonychus terricola.— ALFRED THORNLEY, South Leverton Vicarage: April 11th, 1893. A new variety of Telephorus figuratus.—The specimens of Telephorus previously recorded by me as elongatus appear really to be a black form of 7. figuratus. I find they will not do for the subgenus Rhagonycha, but belong to Telephorus proper. The specimens are entirely black, with the exception of the labrum, mandibles, knees, claws, extreme side margins of thorax, outside of anterior and intermediate tibie, and pubescence, which are coloured much as in scoticus. The under-side of the first two or three joints of the antennw is also somewhat lighter, and occasionally the tibiz are lighter where they join the tarsi. As 7. elongatus has been recorded by Mr. W. Lennon from the Solway district apart from fir trees (see the Annals of Scottish Natural History, April, 1892, and reprint therefrom), I was less on my guard in determining my specimens than I ought to have been; they were taken by sweeping in a damp place along with paludosus. I propose to call the variety eruachanus, from Ben Cruachan, near which it was found.—A. J. CHITTY, 33, Queen’s Gate Gardens, S.W.: March 4th, 1898. Rare Coleoptera.—On April 17th I took my fourth specimen of Scybalicus oblongiusculus in Portland. On the 13th I took Masoreus Wetterhalii, and one of Hypera elongata on the Chesil Beach. The latter agrees with that species in my father’s cabinet, but Fowler records it as very rare, and perhaps doubtfully indigenous. However, another species which occurs at Glanvilles Wootton, viz., Adimonia N 2 144: (June, elandica, Fowler records only from Whittlesea Mere and Wicken Fen (Coleoptera of Brit. Islands). Adimonia tanaceti also occurs here, where there is no tansy or thyme.—C. W. Dats, Glanvilles Wootton: May 1st, 1893. Claviger testaceus in Wychwood Forest.—In looking through the specimens of Pselaphide and Clavigeride contained in the Hopeian Collection, I was rather surprised to find a specimen of the above insect with the following label attached to it, in the handwriting of Professor Westwood :—“ Claviger foveolatus, Miill., taken 30th of August, 1838, in ants’ nest under stone on New Hill Plain, Wychwood Forest, attached to this winged ant on under-side of body.—J. O. W.”” The ant in question is Lasius flavus, of which a winged gf and a § are represented on the card in company with the beetle. As this is, I believe, the only Midland locality for this insect, it is therefore well worth recording. I hope during this year to record the same insect, as I expect to work the locality myself—Joun W. Supp, Oxford University Museum, Oxford: April 2nd, 1893. Silpha atrata and its varieties—There appears to me to be considerable differ- ence in the divergence from type of the two varieties of this Silpha, viz., brunnea and subrotundata. I have taken both forms as well as the type in some numbers, and my experience does not in every point confirm the descriptions given in Canon Fowler’s “ British Coleoptera.” Var. brunnea appears to me to be a true variety, probably not racial, as I have found it and the type form together, and differing from the type only in colour. My captures are not as a rule smaller than S. atrata, but perhaps more irregular in size than the type; I have taken it nowhere but in Wales, but not specially at high elevations. It is reported from Orkney, and the Rev. W. F. Johnson believes that he has taken it in Ireland. Var. subrotundata diverges very much more from the type, and is undoubtedly a racial form. The divergence appears to me to be specific, and not varietal merely. It is usually larger than the type, but varies in size more even than brunnea; the shape is invariably broader in proportion to length than in 8. atrata, the thorax less punctured on the disc, and the convex margins of both thorax and elytra are always broader, and the convexity deeper. The colour, of course, is different, but varies from a form as dark as the type to one as light as a light drunnea. I can find no difference in the elytral keels ; they vary in each of the three forms, and appear to me to vary equally in each. These differences seem to be quite as great as those which separate many species; such instances will readily occur to the Coleopterist. The interesting question, however, is, whether there exists authentic evidence of this form having been ever taken except in Ireland and the Isle of Man? I am myself disposed to attribute our English records to var. brunnea,as that form might very easily be taken for var. subrotundata by any one not conversant with the genuine Irish insect. It is evident that the interest attaching to this Silpha would be much enhanced could it be proved to be so restricted in its distribution, and I am anxious to obtain what evidence there may be accessible of its occurrence elsewhere.—W. EH. SHARP, Ledsham, Cheshire: May, 1898. [I am much inclined to consider var. brunnea as an immature or not quite developed form of atrata; var. subrotundata, from its shape and size, and to a certain extent, from its sculpture, might be regarded as a distinct species, if there were no intermediate forms.—W. W. F.]. 1893.] 145 Ceuthorhynchus pilosellus, Gyll., §e., at Woking.—I found an example of this extremely rare British weevil in a small sand pit in this neighbourhood at the end of April, but my subsequent endeavours to discover the food-plant have been quite unsuccessful. The only Crucifere in the immediate vicinity of the pit are Brassica rapa and Capsella bursa-pastoris; the first-mentioned plant produces O. sulcicollis and O. assimilis in abundance, and C. guadridens sparingly. The most likely looking plant, so far as I can discover, is Lycopsis arvensis, which grows sparingly in the district. M. Bedel informs me that he thinks it probable that C. pilosellus lives upon a small Allium, or upon some plant belonging to the same Order (Liliacea). The Woking specimen agrees well with one given me many years ago by Mr. S. Stevens, except that it has more distinct patches of whitish scales on the elytra. The last British record of C. pilosellus appears to be that of Dr. Power—1864, at Seaton, Devon. Sitones griseus occurs sparingly in the Woking district, always upon Ornithopus perpusillus, a plant not hitherto recorded for this insect I believe. Cleonus nebulosus appeared as early as April 3rd, and Cicindela sylvatica a few days later. Anisotoma nigrita was observed on May 6th.—G. C. Cuampion, Horsell, Woking: May 13th, 1893. On arsenic as a preservative.—A friend has kindly called my attention to an ambiguity in my notes on this subject in our last No. I used the words “a solution of arsenic in alcohol.” But arsenic is insoluble in alcohol, and should first of all be dissolved in water in the proportion of 1 part of arsenic to 120 of water by weight. Pure (not methylated) alcohol can then be added until only the least possible deposit is present on evaporation, as previously stated. Most persons will probably find it better to have the arsenic prepared by a chemist, rather than attempt the preparation themselves.—R. McLacuian, Lewisham: May 16th, 1893. Obituary. J. F. M. Bigot, who was born in 1818, died at Paris, where he had practically resided all his life, on April 14th, 1893. He had been a Member of the Entomolo- gical Society of France since 1844, and his first paper was published in its Annals. in 1845, as were most of those that followed. He was a prolific writer on Diptera, but the quality of his work did not find favour amongst the students of that Order, and did not escape severe criticism. Charles N. F. Brisout de Barneville, ex-President and Honorary Member of the Entomological Society of France, died at St. Germain-en-Laye, near Paris, on May 2nd, in his 71st year. He did much good work. His early studies were principally devoted to Orthoptera, but it is probably as a Coleopterist, and especially as a writer on Curculionidae, that he was best known. Professor James Wood-Mason died at sea on his way home from Calcutta on May 6th. He was the eldest son of a Gloucestershire medical man, and was born in that County in 1846. He was educated at Charterhouse School, and subsequently at Queen’s College, Oxford, where he showed a bias in favour of Natural History and Geology, and through the instrumentality of Professors Phillips and Huxley he became Assistant Curator in the Indian Museum at Calcutta, and subsequently 146 (June, Curator ; and also Professor of Comparative Anatomy and Physiology'at the Medical College of Bengal. He was a good all-round Naturalist, and was on more than one occasion deputed by the Indian Government to investigate the causes of failure of crops, and he also recently took part in a deep sea dredging expedition. As an entomologist his attention was chiefly directed to the WMantide and Phasmide, in both of which Families he did much good work spread over a multitude of papers, and he was engaged on a General Catalogue of the former Family, which is in part published. He also wrote much on Indian Butterflies, chiefly in conjunction with Mr. de Nicéville. He had not been home for many years, and the trying climate of Calcutta, and overwork, had developed Bright’s disease, which it was thought a visit to England might cure or alleviate, but it was too late, and he died a few days before he should have reached this country. Wood-Mason was a man of great general knowledge in Natural History, and his death at the early age of 47 is much to be deplored. He leaves a widow and several children. Sovieties. BrrMincGHam Entomonoeicat Society: April 17th, 1893.—Mr. W. G. Buatcu, President, in the Chair. Messrs. R. C. Bradley, W. Harrison, and C. J. Wainwright, each showed long series of Bombylius major from Trench Woods, where it was quite common at Haster. Mr. Wainwright showed a long series of Melanostoma ambigua and other Diptera taken at the same time and place. Mr. A. H. Martineau showed Prionus coriarius and other insects from Solihull. Mr. R. Freer read a paper upon “ Variation, with * and he showed a number of insects in illustration. special reference to Melanism ;’ He believed that both a deficiency and a superabundance of pigment were patholo- gical conditions. He showed that in those localities where melanic forms mostly occurred, the conditions of life were not very favourable—such were sea shores where food-plants had low nutritive powers; isolated spots where there was much in- breeding ; the neighbourhood of large towns, &c.; and he believed that these conditions of life were the cause in the organism of pathological conditions with melanic results. He believed pigment to be an expression of energy.—CoLBRAN J. WAINWRIGHT, Hon. Sec. LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIRE ENrTomMoLoaicaL Society: May 8th, 1893.— Mr. S. J. Capper, F.L.S., F.H.S., President, in the Chair. Mr. Robert Newstead, F.E.S., communicated a paper, entitled, “On a successful method of rearing Deilephila galii,” in which he gave his experience of rearing this species in 1888, and stated that cold was fatal to the larve, and that forcing was absolutely necessary for the pupe. The author also added some notes on “ Lepidop- tera attracted by honey dew.” The President exhibited some fine varieties of Boarma rhomboidaria ; Mr. Collins, Hadena suasa, and a Lancashire specimen of Boarmia abietaria; Mr. Deville, African Pieride; Mr. Sharp, Coleoptera from Wales; Dr. Ellis, Coleoptera from Grahamstown, South Africa; Mr. Watson, Papilio Macleayana and P. Sarpedon—F. N. Pierce, Hon. Sec.,7, The Elms, Dingle, Liverpool. . 1893. ] : 147 Tue Souta Lonpon EntomotogicaL anp Natura History Soctery: April 13th, 1893.—J. JENNER WEIR, Hsq., F.L.S., President, in the Chair. Mr. Edwards exhibited, through the President, a specimen of Papilio Jovindra from the Himalayan region, Mr. Weir remarking that the species was a mimic. Mr. R. Adkin read an extract from an interesting letter addressed to Mr. Billups by My. T. D. A. Cockerell from Jamaica, and exhibited the leaves containing the species of Coccide referred to. Mr. Manger exhibited Dorippe japonica, a Crustacean from Japan. Mr. Adkin exhibited a small collection of Sphinges and Bombyces from Sutherlandshire, consisting of Sesia scoliiformis, Bork., Arctia Caja, L., Dicranura vinula, Li., Orgyia antiqua, L., Nemeophila plantaginis, L., and N. russula, L., the male specimen of which had smoky hind-wings, and Odonestis potatoria, L., the coloration of the female being intermediate between the sexes. The Secretary, Mr. H. Williams, read a letter from Mr. Robson, of Hartlepool, requesting aid from Members of the Society in filling up forms he had prepared, asking for certain in- formation as to meteorological conditions, &c., when sugaring for Noctue, and thus, by comparing results from different parts of the country, Mr. Robson hoped to come to some conclusion regarding some of the anomalies of this subject. Mr. Robson said he would be happy to send forms to any applicant for same. Mr. Turner reported the capture of Hupithecia nanata, Hb., Ematurga atomaria, L., and larve of Thera firmata, Hb., T. variata, Schiff.,and Hllopia fasciaria, Schiff., and Mr. Carpenter said that Thecla rubi, L., had been taken at Eynsford, Kent,on April 3rd, and Syrichthus malve, L.,on April 9th. The remainder of the evening was devoted to a long discussion with regard to the proposed excursions of the Society during the ensuing summer. April 27th, 1893.—The President in the Chair. Mr. Tutt exhibited a series of Tapinostola concolor, Gn., from Cambridgeshire, and remarked upon the extremely restricted range of this species, and in how very few localities it had been taken in any number, and he pointed out the confusion that had arisen with regard to the nomenclature of this insect in consequence of Hiibner’s figure of 7’. extrema having blackish cilia. Mr. Weir mentioned that speci- mens of Polyommatus dispar, Haw., had fetched £6 each on Tuesday last at Stevens’ Auction Rooms. Mr. W. H. Wright exhibited a very long and variable series of Bombyz castrensis, L., bred from larve captured on the banks of the Medway, and mentioned that his experience was that unless the larve were, say, within about a week of being full-fed when captured, they usually refused to feed and seldom came to maturity. Mr. R. Adkin and Mr. Tutt both corroborated this view, stating this species was especially resentful to a change of habitat. In proof of the recent extraordinarily fine weather, Mr. Tutt mentioned that Melitea Cinwia, L., and other June species were on the wing in Guernsey, and that Lycena Argiolus, L., was flying at Hereford during the first week in April, and Mr. R. Adkin noted the rare occurrence of the Blackthorn (Prunus spinosa) and Whitethorn (Crategus oxya- cantha) being in blossom at the same time. In the course of some remarks upon Colias Edusa, Fb., Mr. Tutt said it ought to have had a good chance of hibernating here this last winter. In Algeria and Marocco it could be got in all its stages, with the exception of the egg, nearly the whole year through, and that in the Mediterra- nean littoral it practically did not hibernate at all, but one brood followed the other in rapid succession. 148 : bi (June, 1893. 12 EntomotoatcaL Socizty or Lonpon: May 10th, 1893. — Henkiy Joun Hiwes, Esq., F.L.S., F.ZS., President, in the Chair. Mr, A. Caren Field, of 81, Wiltshire Road, Brixton, S. W., was elected a Fellow of the Society. Mr. R. McLachlan exhibited, for Dr. Fritz Miiller, of Blumenau, Santa Catarina, Brazil, specimens of larve and pupz of a Dipterous insect, Paltostoma torrentium, and read.a letter from Dr. Fritz Miiller.on the subject. The writer stated that these larvee were of the same nature as those exhibited by Mr. Gahan at a Meeting of the Society in October, 1890 (cf. Proc. Ent. Soc., 1891, p. ii). Mr. 8S. G. C. Russell exhibited Hepaia alveolus, var. Taras, taken by him at_ Woking in April last. i x! Mr. J. M. Adye exhibited a long sees of Moma Orion, Eurymene dolabraria, Amphidasis betularia, and Chloeophora prasinana, and a few specimens of Notodonta dodonea, N. chaonia, and N. trepida, Acronycta alni, and Selenia illustraria, all bred by him in March and pel last, from larvee obtained in the autumn of 1892 in the New Forest. Mr. H. Goss read a copy of a letter received by the Marquess of Ripon, at the Colonial Office, from the Governor of the Gold Coast, reporting the occurrence of vast swarms of locusts at Aburi and Accra, West Africa, about the middle of February last. The writer stated that at Accra the swarm extended from east to west as far as the eye could see, and appeared to occupy a space about two miles wide. Colonel Swinhoe stated that some years ago he had been requested by the Indian Government to report on plagues of locusts. He said he had witnessed swarms of these insects far larger than the one just reported from the Gold Coast, and mentioned that many years ago, when going up the Red Sea in one of the old P. and O. paddle- boats, the boat had frequently to stop to clear her paddle-wheels from locusts. Mr. C. G. Barrett called attention to a field excursion to the Cotswolds which it was proposed to have in June. Fellows of the Society were requested by the President to communicate to Mr. Barrett, as early as possible, their views as to the dates which would be most generally convenient for such excursion, and to offer any other suggestions on the subject which might occur to them. Mr. E. C. Reed, of Valparaiso, Chili, communicated a paper, entitled, “ Notes on Aecridium paranense, the migratory locust of the Argentine Republic.” Colonel Swinhoe, Mr. Champion, Mr. Elwes, Mr. McLachlan, and Mr. Merrifield took part in the discussion which ensued. Professor L. C. et communicated a paper, entitled, “ Dicranota: a Carni- vorous Tipulid Larva.’ Dr. T. A. Chapman communicated a paper, entitled, “On a Lepidopterous pupa (Mieropteryx purpurella) with functionally active mandibles.” Mr. McLachlan said Dr. Chapman’s observations were of great value, and tended to show that the position of Wicropteryx was nearer the Trichoptera than had been supposed. The President announced that the new Library Catalogue, which had been edited by Mr. Champion, with the assistance of Mr. McLachlan and Dr. Sharp, was now ready for sale to the public at 9s.,and to the Fellows of the Society at 6s. a copy.—H. Goss, Hon. Secretary. July, 1893. | é 149 EXPLANATORY NOTICE OF MY VIEWS ON THE SUB-ORDERS OF DIPTERA. BY C. R. OSTEN-SACKEN. Through the communications of some of my correspondents since the publication of my paper “ On the characters on the three divisions of Diptera, &c.” (in the Berl. Ent. Zeitschr., xxxvii, 1892, pp. 417—66), I became aware that some misconceptions prevail in certain quarters about my views on the larger sub-divisions of the Order Diptera, called sub-Orders by Brauer. The fault apparently is on my side, as I have not been explicit enough on pages 426—8 (l.c.) of the above quoted paper. On page 423, line 6 from top, instead of “Ali the other Diptera,’ I should have put—“ Orthorrhapha Brachycera and Cyclorr- hapha Athericera;” and on page 429, line 18 from bottom, I should have added the same five words at the end of the line which begins with the word “ foot-note.” I beg my readers to make this alteration at once. Macquart had two sub-Orders, Memocera and Brachycera;, Brauer had also two, Orthorrhapha and Cyclorrhapha, but the dividing line between them was at a different place from that of Macquart’s. In consequence of the considerations explained at length in my paper, I adopt three sub-Orders, and call them Orthorrhapha Nemocera, Orthorr- hapha Brachycera, aud Cyclorrhapha Athericera* (l.c., p. 427, in the middle). In other words, I adopt Brauer’s nomenclature, except that his Orthorrhapha Brachycera I consider as a separate sub-Order, while he considered it as a division, which, together with his division Orthorrhapha Nemocera, formed his sub-Order Orthorrhapha. His sub-Order Cyclorrhapha I call Cyclorrhapha Athericera. In the same place I said (J.c., p. 426), “‘ Family names in Zoology must consist of one word only ; but there is no inconvenience in using compound names for larger divisions. They are not exactly names but designations, they must have something of the descriptive character in them, &c.”’ The three names of the sub-Orders which I adopt have the ad- vantage of being descriptive of a character taken from their metamorphoses on one side, and of another character taken from the imago and its principal organ of orientation (the antenne) on the other. The names Orthorrhapha and Cyclorrhapha were very happily chosen by Brauer to characterize the metamorphoses of each of the groups, and should therefore be preserved. The names Nemocera and * Derived from the Greek athev, arista, awn, and keras, born. O 150 [July, Athericera were adopted for two groups by Latreille, and should likewise be retained. Finally, the name Orthorrhapha Brachycera was used by Brauer himself for a division which I consider as a sub-Order. The position of the Pupipara I leave an-open question. Within the three sub-Orders there are groups of Families which I called divisions, and of which I characterized two in the sub-Order Orthorrhapha Nemocera, and one in the Orthorrhapha Brachycera. Future workers will perhaps succeed in grouping the remaining Families in the same way; until this be done these Families can be retained in statu quo ante. The arrangement which I conceive at present is, therefore, as follows :— I.—OrTHORRHAPHA NEMOCERA. Nemocera vera. Nemocera anomala. Il.—OrTHORRHAPHA BRACHYCERA. Hremocheta. One more word about the division Memocera anonala. I called it artificial for want of a better expression, although the Families which compose it are connected by characters of the utmost im- portance (J.c., p. 429 at the top), most of which never occur in the Nemocera vera. Only the grouping of these Families is less compact than is the case in the WV. vera, the gaps between them are broader, and the transitions less apparent. But it may happen that further discoveries will bridge over these intervals, and convert this division, now somewhat artificial, into a compact or natural one. The opposite case may also happen: that future discoveries may necessitate a further sub-division. Or we may admit a still different possibility ; that the transitional forms are, at present, entirely extinct, but that in earlier epochs the division was a natural one. The characters of the Families which compose the division WV. anomala do not exclude any of these possibilities. At any rate, it is evident that such an artificial or provisional division is indispensable for the present. It has nothing in common with a mere grouping of Families or Genera incerte sedis, which have no connection whatever between them. Heidelberg: June 1st, 1898. _ 1898. | ; 151 A SINGULAR GENUS OF CAPSIDZ. BY DR. O. M. REUTER. My friend, Dr. E. Bergroth, has sent me for examination a speci- men of a very curious Capsid, found by Mr. J. J. Walker in Tasmania. This insect belongs to a new genus, for which it is necessary to form also a new division. The hemielytra without cuneus and embolium are shaped and punctured nearly as in the Family Lygeide, with which this insect accords, also by the long first joint of the tarsi, but the membrane is constructed as in Capside. The antenne resemble those of a Cimex or of some Anthocoride, and also the general appearance, the broadly oval body, and the ferruginous colour, remind a little of the bed bug. I have named the genus Lyg«oscytus, and the species cumicoides. It is probably of old geological age. Divisio LYGAOSCYTARIA, x. d. Caput nutans, subtrigonum, ante oculos longe productum, vertice sulco longitu- dinali destituto, loris baud discretis, genis humillimis, gula horizontali, medio longi- tudinaliter late deplanata. Oculi orbita interiore haud emarginati. Antenne articulis duobus ultimis gracillimis. Pronotum strictura apicali nulla, lateribus marginatis, margine toto acuto. Scutellum basi detectum. Hemielytra forme macropterse embolio et cuneo haud discretis, fractura cunei incisuraque externa marginis ante apicem nullis, margine laterali externo usque a basi dilatato. Mem- brana parvula, area unica angusta, vena suture membrane subparallela. Coxee postice ab epipleuris hemielytrorum late distantes. Tarsi articulo primo secundo duplo longiore, tertio primo paullo breviore. Unguiculi breviusculi, leviter curvati, aroliis nullis. LYGmoscytus, n. g. Corpus late rotundato-ovale, sat deplanatum, superne impresso-punctatum. Caput pronoto multo angustius, nutans, vertice immarginato, fronte medio planius- cula, clypeo cum fronte confluente, ejus basi in linea inter scrobis antennarum ducta posita, bucculis angustis, insertionem antennarum haud attingentibus. Oculi totam altitudinem laterum capitis occupantes a latere visi ovati, ab antico visi orbita interiore subparalleli, apice paullo divergentes, orbita posteriore parum sinuati. Antenne articulo primo apicem capitis paullo superante, secundo primo sque crasso, sublineari, duobus ultimis gracillimis. Rostrum coxas posticas superans, gracile, articulo primo maxginem posticum partis apicalis oculi attingente, articulo secundo duobus ultimis simul sumtis paullo brevioribus, his longitudine equalibus. Pronotum trapeziforme, apice capite latius, basin versus fortius dilatatum, margine basali supra scutellum levissime sinuato, callis distinctis, disco pone eos transversim late depresso. Scutellum basi declivi detecta. Hemielytra pronoto latiora, lateribus rotundato-dilatata, vena clavi venaque brachiali corii elevatis subparallelis, sutura clavi deleta, vena corii cubitali solum basali parte distinguenda, corii limbo laterali exteriore basin versus late explanato-dilatato, basi late dilatato. MKyphus prosterni O02 152 (July, . planus, tenuiter marginatus. Metastethium orificiis angustis, crasse marginatis. Coxe postice approximate. Pedes pilosi, tibiis spinulis destitutis, pilis tenuibus semiadpressis. LYG#OscYTUS CIMICOIDES, 7. sp. Ferrugineus, flavo-pilosus, pilis retrorsum vergentibus, capite pronoto antice basique scutelli minute punctatis, pronoto postice hemielytrisque profunde et grosse impresso-punctatis, corlo versus apicem paullo subtilius et obsoletius punctato ; corio intus fuscescenti-ferrugineo, mem- brana cinereo-fumata; capite apice nigro ; antennis pedibusque flavo-testaceis, illis articulo primo annulo basali et apicali piceis. Long., 43, lat., 23 mm. Patria; Tasmania, Franklin, Huon River, D. J. J. Walker (Mus. = Brits): Caput latitudine cum oculis paullo longius, parcius minute punctatum, vertice oculo (?) duplo latiore. Oculi fusco- » ferruginei. Rostrum articulo primo ferru- gineo, secundo pallide flavente, duobus ultimis picxis. Antenne subtiliter pilose, articulo secundo pronoti longitudine et primo duplo et dimidio longiore, pilis nonnullis longissimis exsertis, duobus ultimis longitudine squalibus, simul sumtis secundo parum longioribus. Pronotum basi quam apice duplo latius, latitudini apicali eque longum, callis parteque apicali parcius, ad marginem anticum tamen densius minuteque punctatis, parte posteriore lateribusque usque in marginem grosse impresso-punctatis. Scutellum equelaterum. Hemielytra medio pronoto fere duplo latiora, usque in marginem impresso-punctata, punctis magnis circa venas seriatis, sutura membrane commissura paullo breviore. Femora inferne pilis longissimis exsertis. ) Helsingfors: March, 1893. DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES OF ORTHOPTERA FROM THE TRANSVAAL. BY H. DE SAUSSURE, HON. F.E.S., &e. ACRIDIIDA. XIPHOCERA ENSICORNIS, 2. sp. Grisea vel fusca, minute sabulosa, vitta longitudinali corporis utrinque pallida, de reliquo fusco-lineata et punctata. Antenns modice late ensiformes, articulis 125 2° aurantiis; articulis ultimis 5 moniliformibus, 5°, 6° ab apice (pars intermedia) deplanatis. Frons in processum distinctum apice rotundato-truncatum producta. Vertex a a el 1893,] i 153 horizontalis, rostro regulariter trigonali, marginibus quoque arcuatis, apice rectangulo. Carine laterales scutelli verticis obsoletissime. Pronotum antice et postice acutangulum; crista elevata, regulariter arcuata, in prozona integra, in metazona crenata. Pars dorsalis pronoti tuberculis subacutis elevatis conspersa, saltem in parte postica. Sulci 3 parum impressi, lacunis translu- cidis nullis. Pedes antici haud granulati, pedes postici sabulosi etsi in tibiis. Femora postica ad 2um typum* pertinentia, quoque modice lata, margine supero subrecto ante condylum tamen subsinuato, spinis 10—12, in condylo 3 seratiformibusque, Margo inferior vise arcuatus, subtiliter spinulosus. Tibix postice extus spinis 10. Abdomen basi granulatum, apice punctatum, carinatum; segmentis ultra me- dium dente trigonali armatis. ?. Long., 55, long. pronot., 15, fem. post., 20, latit. femor. post., 6, latit. an- tenne, 2 mm. Hab. : Transvaal, Zoutpansberg (Coll. Dist. and de Sauss.). The colour of this Xiphocera is very variable, as in all the species. The species comes next to X. cristata, Sauss. (l.c., p. 44,5). It is smaller; the crest of pronotum is regularly arcuate, and has no translucid fenestre, &e. Geneva: 1893. NOTES ON NEW OR LITTLE KNOWN COCCIDZ (No. 4). BY R. NEWSTEAD, F.E.S., CURATOR OF THE GROSVENOR MUSEUM, CHESTER. PLATE II. PSEUDINGLISIA, x. 9. ? adult. Scale elevated, more or less circular, ridged ; ventra] scale complete, detached ; antenne of four joints; anal lobes very minute; last five segments of body with broad chitinous plates bearing spinnerets ; rostrum biarticulate. PSEUDINGLISIA RODRIGUEZIMA, nN. Sp. 2 adult (fig.1). Dark purplish-red, mottled with lighter red ; elongate-ovate, widely rounded in front, gradually narrowed behind the insertion of posterior legs ; zomital divisions very distinct in the living insect; margins of the segments at the sides bearing very long hairs, which gradually shorten as they near the anus, and are almost wanting on the cephalic margin. LHyes very large, projecting, somewhat in the form of a truncated cone, unicolorous with the body. Antenne (fig. 1a) of four nearly equal joints ; 1st much contracted at base, has one or more short stiff hairs ; 3rd with three, 4th with two at apex and two alittle belowthem. Rostrum (fig. 16) biarticulate, apex with two stiff hairs; rostral filaments, which make their exit through the first joint of the rostrum, are very long. Legs (fig. 1c) short, very little longer than the antenne ; trochanter very small; tibie grooved, about as long again as the tarsi, the latter without digitules but with a short stiff hair at apex; claws * Saussure, Spizilegia Genavensis, II, p. 29. 154 (July, blunt, without digitules. Near the insertion of all the legs, on the posterior side, is a clear, almost circular space (? spiracles). Last five segments (fig. 1d) formed of brown chitinous plates, widest at the margin ; six of these, three on each side of the pygidium, are more or less pointed at their apices, which terminate near the anal orifice ; each plate, except the first pair, with a few rather large spinnerets of the form shown at fig. le; these spinnerets slightly varying in size, and also as to their number and position. The position of the anal orifice will be seen on referring to the fig. 1d. At fig. 1f is shown in profile a view of the last five segments in the act of extruding an ege. Pygidium (ventral aspect, fig. 1g) very small, attached to the first pair of plates, consists of a very dark chitinous plate, bearing on either side four spines of varied length, as shown in the fig. ; in addition to the plate there are two very minute lobes, each bearing’a spine, the lobes, however, are very difficult to see in some specimens. There is a divisional line right through the centre of the pygidium, on either side of which, at the inner side of the chitinous plate, are two well defined, clear, rectangular spaces, the posterior margins of which are very finely serrated. The dorsal aspect of the pygidium is as shown in the fig. 14. Above the pygidium are two long, angular, caudal scales, similar to those found in the Leca- niine ; immediately below the caudal scales are two very small spines. This drawing (fig. 1%) was made from a specimen mounted without preparation in potash and without pressure, which will account for the slight discrepancy in the outline of the two figures. Long., 1 mm. ; wide, 3—? mm. Scale (fig. 2, 2a). White, sub-opaque and somewhat glassy, circular, or nearly 80; conical, except the margins, which are broadly flattened ; radiating from the apex are from six to eight (usually seven) strong ridges or carine, which gradually disappear as they near the margin, where they are often entirely wanting. Ventral scale free, white, complete, sometimes having a central yellowish stain. Diam., 2—24 mm.; high, ;—1 mm. Larva. Antenne of six joints (fig. 3), of which the last two are the longest, and have one or more rather long hairs. Legs (fig. 3a) about the same length as the antenne, are short and stout; tibio-tarsal joint very faint, the former with a short stiff hair at apex. The four digitules very slender. Rostrum (fig. 36) bi- articulate. Anus with a very small chitinous plate (fig. 3c), very like the portion of the 9 which I have termed the pygidium, on either side of which are two very long and stout hairs, but whether these originate from true anal lobes I am not able to determine, as I can see no trace of them. 6 unknown in any stage. Hab. : on Rodriguezia secunda at Haton Hall, Chester, the seat of His Grace the Duke of Westminster, on plants freshly imported from Trinidad, December, 1889, and January, 1890. Received from Mr. Hand, the orchid grower, who kindly supplied a single leaf of the food-plant, on the basal portion of which were many examples of this pretty and interesting Coccid. I am very doubtful as to the position this species should occupy, bearing as it does characters both of the Lecaniine and the Ooccine ; of the former the anal plates, and of the latter the multiarticulate i. es es a RA Eny Mo Mac, You. IV.) 4. Newstead, Del. et Lith, 1893. ] ; 155 rostrum and anal lobes. While examining a living 9 I saw it con- stantly retract the dorsal epidermis, on both’ sides, just behind the antenne, and considerably within the margin, and then instantly regain its position. The area retracted was comparatively large, and it had much the appearance of an india rubber ball regaining its position after pressure. EXPLANATION OF PLATE II. 9 —fig. I, body under-side; 1a, antenne; 10, rostrum; 1c, leg; 14d, last five seg- ments; le, spinneret ; If, profile of last five segments, showing extrusion of egg; 1g, pygidium ventral ; 1h, ditto, dorsal aspect; 2 and 2a, scale, profile and dorsal aspect. Larva—fig. 3, antenne ; 3a, leg; 3b, rostrum ; 3c, anal portion of body. Chester: January, 1893. THE WEST INDIAN SPECIES OF MYTILASPIS AND PINNASPIS. BY T. D. A. COCKERELL, F.Z.S. We have in the West Indies, so far as at present known, three species of Mytilaspis and two of Pinnaspis. Of the Mytilaspis species two are 4 new, and the third is the s # common mussel scale of the orange, JL. eitricola. So ils 1 eimayestollewe tilda il, Gloveri, the other orange | scale in the Southern U.S., is not found in the West Indies. I have J/. Gloveri from Louisiana, sent by Prof. Riley, and it is fully distinct from anything we get here. Pinnaspis is a genus I separated from Mytilaspis in Journ. Inst. Jamaica, 1892, p. 186. Our two species are P. pandani and a new one on bamboo. Myrinaspis crrricota (Pack.), Comst. This is said to be identical with WM. pinneformis, an orchid scale. I have seen no orchid Mytilaspis here, although I have been particularly interested in looking for scales on orchids. Supposing citricola to = pinneformis, it is rather remarkable that it does not occur on orchids in Jamaica, since it is so very abundant on Citrus, It is, however, a fact, that certain Coccide differ in their food-plants in different countries, although the specimens can be separated by no ascertainable structural characters. Such is the case with Aspidiotus aurantii, Maskell, the well-known red scale of Citrus trees, which in Jamaica is common on lignum vite, and occurs on Oycas and Areca, but never, so far as observed, on any Citrus. And there is here no mistake about identity, as Mr. Maskell himself has examined some of the Jamaican specimens. WM. citricola has been sent to me by Mr. C. A. Barber from Antigua, where it was injuring tangerine orange trees. 156 | July, MYTILASPIS CROTONIS, ”. sp. Found by Mr. J. J. Bowrey in his garden at Kingston, Jamaica. It lives ona variegated Croton with narrow leaves. The twigs are more or less covered by the scales, which are so exactly the colour of the bark, and so resemble the rugosities natural to the plant, that notwithstanding their abundance, they are only detected on close examination. The scale is about the shape and size of IM. pomorum; some show holes through which a parasite has escaped. The very young larva is active, pale purplish with yellowish extremities. The caudal filaments are about as long as the greatest diameter of the body, but they are easily broken off. Between the tubercles, which bear the long filaments, are two small but distinct tubercles, each bearing two very short bristles. Along the margin, immediately external to the filament-bearing tubercle, is on each side a pair of bristles of fair length. Beyond (anterior to) these is another shorter pair, and further still two more pairs, which are very short and not conspicuous. On the sides of the thoracic region are one or two short hairs. On the margin, anterior to each antenna, is a blunt tubercle, and the anterior cephalic margin presents three pairs of hairs, the middle pair strongest, the outermost pair rudimentary or almost obsolete. The last joint of the antenna presents three or four short but strong hairs. The general form of the larva is oval. The leg shows a strong claw apparently without digitules, but the tarsus has stout clubbed hairs, longer than the claw. In colour these larvee resemble those of MZ. Gloveri, as described by Comstock. The adult female, as usual in the genus, is elongate. The terminal portions are yellow shading into orange. The lobes are much as in other members of the genus: median lobes separate, well-developed, trilobed ; next pair bifid, and smaller; third pair practically obsolete, but two distinct notched projections beyond them. The really extraordinary character of the adult ? is in the spinous plates, which are prolonged into long hairs, after the manner of Aspidiotus chameropsis, as figured by Signoret. This distinguishes the species at once, but with rough handling the hairs are easily broken off, leaving an appearance like the ordinary spinous plates. Bright orange mites are common among the scales, and seem to prey upon them. I found one mite inside a female scale, half concealed beneath the body of the female ; another actually had hold of a larva. The anterior legs of these mites emit two very long hairs, a character which may perhaps serve to distinguish them. MYTILASPIS ALBUS, 2. sp. I found this in East Street, Kingston, in abundance on the stems of a roadside weed. The plant is one of the Malvacee, low, shrubby, with a strong odour, yellow flowers, and pubescent or velvety cordate practically entire leaves. Mr. Bowrey tells me it is locally called “sage,” but Grisebach applies that name to a different plant, neither, of course, being the true English sage. The ? scale is about 23 mm. long, elongate, narrow, mytiliform, convex, sometimes curved. The scales vary much, some being quite long and narrow, others broad. Colour greyish-white, the exuvie, which are of the usual size, reddish-brown. Several of the scales show holes where parasites have escaped. The adult female is elongate, mytiliform, narrow anteriorly, with three blunt and wide lateral tubercles. Colour brown. 1893. ] 157 The lobes and plates are much as in other Mytilaspis species. Between the median lobes, which are well apart, are two spinous plates. The median lobes are well-formed, rounded, and blunt. The second pair of lobes are more pointed, some- times indistinctly trilobed ; those of the third pair are fairly well developed and notched. Beyond the third lobe are two pointed projections, and anterior to these the margin is more or less scalloped, with a couple of distinct incisions. ‘There are spinous plates, as usual, between the Ist and 2nd, and 2nd and 8rd lobes. The male scale occurred in some abundance. It is about 1 mm. long, straight, with parallel sides ; larval skin at one end. Scale greyish- white ; larval skin orange. The scale has no keel, of course; it resembles the $ scale of a Parlatoria. On the same plants I found Chionaspis minor, Mask., Aspidiotus sp. (very near to, perhaps identical with, 4. punice, n. sp.,* which I found on pomegranate), and a Pseudoparlatoria, so similar to Ps. ostreata, that I believe it to be only separable as a slight variety. When I first found Mytilaspis albus, seeing the tricarinate male scales of C. minor on the same plant, I thought I had got a new Chionaspis. This Wytilaspis, being white, cannot well be confounded with any other American species. Maskell has described white species from New Zealand, which appear to be distinct from JM. albus. PINNASPIS PANDANI (Comst.). Aceording to Mr. Morgan, this should be referred to P. bua, Sign. It occurs in Jamaica on cocoa-nut and Dracena; and Mr. Hart sent it to me from the Royal Botanic Gardens, Trinidad, where it was found in abundance on the leaves of Pan- danus. In the Trinidad specimens it was accompanied by Ischnaspis filiformis, Doug. PINNASPIS BAMBUSH, ”. sp. I found this abundantly on a section of bamboo stem, which had been used for a flower pot at the Hope Gardens, Jamaica. Of course the specimens were all dead. 2 scale about 1 mm. long, mytiliform, pale horn, with a median keel, and inclined to be tricarinate. First skin very small, second skin large and extending forward, as usual in the genus. Ventral scale more or less developed. The second skin is covered by secretion. The adult female (after boiling in caustic soda) is elongate, pale yellowish. The median lobes, as in P. pandani, are closely approximated, and notched without. The second lobes are small, and the third rudimentary, followed by a notch in the margin. Between the first and second lobes is a small spinous plate, but between the second and third a large plate. On the margin, beyond the notch, is a spine, and then a large spinous plate. Then follows, at a fair distance, a smaller notch, and then another spine and spinous plate. Further, on the side of the seg- ment adjacent to the caudal portion, are two large spinous plates. Thus, the arrangement is very much as in pandani, and, except for the rather different scale, it would not be easy to separate the two. Chionaspis minor, Mask., which is easily distinguished by its scale, has also a very similar arrangement of plates and lobes. * T could not be sure about these specimens, as nearly all had been destroyed by parasites. A. punice, which I shall describe at length in a future paper, occurs on the leaves of pomegranate in Kingston, Jamaica, and has been found by Mr. C. A. Barber on cocoa-nut in Dominica. The scale is white, covered with orange-brown exuvie, the first skin nipple-like. The terminal lobes and plates show much resemblance to those of A. ancylus. Mr. Morgan’s A. dictyospermé is allied, but fully distinct. 158 (July, In the body of a ? P. bambuse I found a parasite. I could make out the antenns, which seemed to resemble those of Anaphes, but there was one joint less to the funicle, and the club was smaller in proportion. Institute of Jamaica, Kingston, Jamaica : February 20th, 1893. OCCURRENCE OF GELECHIA (BRYOTROPHA) FIGULELLA, STAUD., IN ENGLAND. BY C. G. BARRETT, F.E.S. Last summer the Rev. C. T. Cruttwell sent the very few Tortrices and Tineina which the then stormy and wet weather had allowed him to secure during a fortnight’s visit to Aldeburgh, Suffolk, for exami- nation. Among them was a Gelechia (Bryotropha) evidently allied to terrella, but with rather shorter wings, which I was unable to identify. Recently, with the kind aid of Lord Walsingham and Mr. Hartley Durrant, it has been recognised as figulella, Staudinger. Mr. Cruttwell says of this specimen, “It was captured on waste land, or salt marshes near the sea, on the coast of Aldeburgh, between July 6th and 20th, 1892.” Of this species Mr. Stainton records in the “ Tineina of Southern Europe,” that he reared four specimens between April 6th and 27th, one from a larva found on February 28th in sand at the roots of some plants of Silene niceensis in a sandy wood near the sea to the east of Cannes, and the others from cocoons found in the sand at the same time. This larva he described “ Whitish-ochreous ; head pale brown, mouth darker; second segment with a dark brown semi-crescent on each side ; dorsal line slender, reddish-ochreous ; subdorsal lines dark brown, paler anteriorly ; spots minute, black; anal segment glossy.” This larva did not eat, but spun up immediately, and its food is there- fore uncertain. It was accidently found while Mr. Stainton was collecting larve of a species which he named Gelechia provinciella, and which had evidently fed in numbers on the Silene, But the habits of the group to which the present species belongs would peeeite ie some grass as a more probable food. The moth is smaller than ordinary Bryotropha terrella, with proportionately broader fore-wings, the costa of which is decidedly arched before the middle; very glossy, grey-brown with a reddish flush; from the base along the fold is a dark clouding of atoms which rather obscures the usual black dots; fascia paler brown, sharply elbowed, but indistinct; and the apical portion beyond the fascia clouded with rows of minute blackish dashes. Hind-wings shining pale grey, darker at the apical margin, cilia grey, rather paler. Staudinger found it at Chiclana, Spain. Lord Walsingham has taken a fine series near Mr. Stainton’s locality in the south of France. 39, Linden Grove, Nunhead, S.E. : June, 1898. 1893. | 159 COURTICEH’S BREEDING CAGE, WITH VARIATIONS. BY H. G@. KNAGGS, M.D., F.L.S. In my early collecting days my good old friend, the late Mr. Henry Doubleday, showed me a muslin-topped glass cylinder, resting on a pan of damp sand, which he was using as a breeding cage. This seemed to me to be an immense advance on those hideous things like meat safes so much in vogue amongst “Aurelians” in the eighteenth century, which are not even yet extinct. Some time afterwards, having dealings with a glass shade merchant, he informed me that the cut-off bottoms or “rims” went into the waste bin under the cutting board ; whereupon it was there and then arranged that he was to save all he could for me at a fair price. By this means scores upon scores of them came into my hands, and were quickly converted into breeding cages for my friends and self by the addition of the perforated plate with muslin stage and top. Larva rearing thus became so pleasant and instructive, the process of changing food, &c., so easy, the cages so cleanly, and the breeding so successful, that considerable impetus was given to this most fasci- nating branch of practical entomology. But, alas! the time came when some other utilitarian found a more profitable use for these rims, and prices consequently went up to a prohibitive figure. It was then that my friend, Mr. J. L. Courtice, set his inventive brain to work to supply the deficiency, and succeeded so well, that at a very trifling cost he produced a cage having many advantages over the original, inasmuch, as the glasses can always be procured and of any desired size, while, owing to its square shape, it occupies less room, and further, can be made to pack safely into a small compass for the purposes of travelling or transmission. This is how it is done. Take four pieces of glass, each of exactly equal size (Mr. Cour- tice’s fancy is three and a half inches by seven) ; these can be pretty easily cut by an amateur with a decent diamond, a little practice, and English material; but any glass cutter will do it for a nominal reward. Of course, if the larva rearer does not mind his cages being all of a size, he can purchase, at an exceedingly low price, foreign glass ready cut for horticultural purposes. Next take a board of deal, mahogany or other wood, half an inch thick when planed, of any length or width, and with a “ three-eighths filletster plane” take out a rabbet, or rebate, Fa down to within an eighth of an inch of the lower surface, and saw off the length an 160 f [July, ) eighth of an inch beyond the rabbet, thus leaving the sides G G, which e1close the angle Fa, each an eighth of an inch thick. Then take out Fd and saw off at I, and so on till the board is finished up, a section of one of these lengths is shown at K. If any difficulty should be found in carrying out the above, the angled wood can be pro- cured, at some factory where steam power is employed to cut wood, at a few shillings per hundred foot run. The next requirement is a square slate an inch or two wider than the base of the cage. This can be sawn out of roofing slates, and perforated in the centre (found by diagonals) by means of a drill bit and hand brace, the hole being afterwards enlarged sufficiently (say te half an inch diameter) with a “ half round rynder.”’ Here again, should the work be considered too troublesome, any slater who has the necessary machinery would cut and drill the pieces at a moderate cost. These perforated slates are then brushed over with glue and litharge, or india rubber solution, and covered with canvas or slipper felt, from the centre of which a hole, corresponding to the perfora- tion, has been punched or cut out. To put the cage together, cut off four pieces of angled wood (B B) a couple of inches shorter than the height; lay them on a table with their angles facing one another in the position of G, Fa, G (fig. 1) and vice versd, brush over their horizontal surfaces with hot glue to which litharge has been added, and press on one of the pieces of glass A, moving it backwards and forwards to get rid of air bubbles, and taking care that it is tight up into the angles ; serve another pair and glass the same, leave them for a short time to dry, then turn them up on their sides, the angles facing, and having brushed over two other surfaces, put in a third piece of glass, and, before this is quite dry, the fourth piece, making sure that these fit closely up to the other glasses: then turn the whole up on end on to a flat superficies, such as a marble mantle piece, and press down the glasses so that they touch the level surface at all points. When dry cover the top with muslin D, stand the even base on the felted slate C, and the latter again on a jam pot, and then you have Courtice’s cage complete and ready for use. 1893. ] ; 161 Touching the variations on this cage referred to in the commencement of this paper: the first is that, in making small cages, such as from two to three inches square (a very useful size), the corners of lucifer boxes, cut off about a quarter of an inch each side of the angles, will be found strong enough to hold them firmly together; if neatness be required, they may be brushed over inside with Berlin black and outside with mahogany stain varnish before glueing in the glasses—this applies to the angled wood of the larger cages. Then again, for travelling or trans- mission, we can, by graduating the sizes of our cages half an inch, from six inches down to-~iwo, easily get a dozen packed into an eight inch (outside measure) cubic box, namely, six of the larger kind, each seven inches high, and six of the smaller, three and three-eighths of an inch high (leaving a quarter inch for felt packing), that is if the perforated stages be not too thick, which brings us to— Variation in the stages. The material of which these are composed may be modified to suit different requirements. In respect to occupation of space for trans- mission, slates of thinner and superior quality, such as are used for school purposes, or glass may be perforated, or vulcanite or poroplastic felt might be employed ; but all are more costly than rooffing slates. For ventilating purposes a piece of No. 8 galvanized wire may be bent into the shape of a square and the ends soldered together ; over this may be strained muslin, through the centre of which a sail eyelet and washers have been firmly fixed. This form of stage affords free ventilation from bottom to top of the cage. If this be considered insecure (and it certainly looks more dangerous than it really is), four legs may be added to the wire frame to steady it. Another way of securing a free supply of air to the cage is by making perfora- tions in the slate in the space which intervenes between the outer circumference of the water vessel and the inner margin of the glass cage, and covering these apertures with muslin ; these openings may be of any size, number or shape, even to cutting away all but so much as is enough to hold together the circular portion on which the jam pot rests, to the square part which supports the cage. . If we wish to employ the cage for full-fed larvee which go to earth, the muslin has to be removed, and means devised to keep the frass from falling on to the soil beneath, and so forming centres of mouldiness, for which reason it is never desirable to use this form of cage until the larve are approaching the stage at which they are ready to pupate. ‘Then as large a flower pot as will be covered by the slate (which, by the way, may be circular) should be used, and its interior fitted with two smaller pots fixed base to base in such a way that the lower one covers the hole in the larger pot, while the upper forms the receptacle for the moveable water vessel, and is on an exact levei with the larger pot, so that both are accurately adapted to the under- side of the slate stage. The space between the smaller and larger pots may then be filled with suitabie soil, and the perforated stage placed over it. This pot is also most useful for such larvee as like to hide themselves when not feeding, in which case sand, sods, rubbish, stones, short bits of bamboo, dead leaves, moss, &c., may be substituted for the soil. With certain alterations it might be made to accommo- date hibernating larvee. Another way of ventilating the cage is by substituting an inch strip of glass, top and bottom, for the fourth glass side, and covering the intervening space with muslin. By similarly making two opposite sides of net, fixing perhaps a central 162 | (July, twig, placing three or four of these cages side by side, net to net, and allowing a current of air to pass through, our chances of pairing, with a view to the production of hybrids, would be greatly enhanced. No doubt other modifications of this ex- cellent cage will occur to the thoughtful breeder, but I trust that I have already said enough to tempt some of your readers to test the value and versatility of “ Courtice’s Breeding Cage.” Camden Road, N.W.: June 3rd, 1893. Note on Eccoptoptera, and an error in the “ Zoological Record.”—In the “Zoological Record” for 1882 Eccoptoptera cupricollis, Chaud., is placed under Scolytide ; and in that for 1891 Eecoptoptera labrata, Fair., is recorded under the same heading. It is desirable to correct an error, which appears destined to become perpetuated in this usually accurate publication. The genus EHecoptoptera was established by Chaudoir in 1878 (Rev. Zool. [3], vi, p. 189) for certain species of the Carabid genus Anthia; and its assignment to Scolytide is owing to Motschulsky’s having founded a genus Eecoptopterus, named by analogy with Eccoptogaster, for a Scolytid beetle (Bull. Mosc., 1863, ii, p. 515). Motschultsky’s genus, founded on wrong characters, cannot possibly stand, and his species, EH. sex-spinosus, I have shown to fall, as Hichhoff predicted, under the latter’s genus Platydactylus (Ind. Mus. Notes, ITI, i, 64). The genus Hecoptopterus therefore lapses. If authors were to indicate the Families of obscure novelties, they would escape being guilty of contributory negligence in the event of their species being wrongly recorded.—W. F. H. BuanpForp, London: June 6th, 1893. Capture of a female Phosphenus hemipterus at Lewes.—Since 1883, when I first discovered this insect, the male has occurred more or less commonly every year, not only in my garden, but in other parts of the town, but singularly enough I had never been successful in taking the female until the evening of June 4th. When walking home about ten o’clock at night I saw something luminous on an asphalt pavement at the base of a wall, and striking a match to find out whence the light proceeded, I at once recognised what a treasure I had found. I am not aware that the female has been previously recorded from England, and it is very singular that I have not been able to find it before, as I have been on the look out for it for many years, both by day and night. The male seems quite a day insect, in fact, I have never found it at night ; it is very fond of sunshine, crawling rapidly at the base of walls, or on the ground close to them. I am inclined to think that the female must live underground, or why cannot I find it? Perhaps some correspondent can offer suggestions which may lead to its capture more freely. As in Lampyris nocetiluca, the perfect insect closely resembles the larva, but the legs are longer and of a different shape, and it has antenne.—C. H. Morris, Lewes, Sussex: June, 1893. Chrysomela gettingensis, L., in Sherwood Forest.—\ took a specimen of this Chrysomela in April in Sherwood Forest on a road ; it is the first time I have ever seen it alive, and it appears to have been very scarce of late years. Beetles were 1893.] d 163 very scarce in the Forest owing to the very dry weather. The only other things I found worth recording were two Hutheia clavata in a decaying birch bough, and two Rhynchites cupreus, beaten from flowers of mountain ash, which were coming out just as I was leaving. The usual Cerylon, Philonthus splendidulus, and Scaphidium quadrimaculatum, &c., were to be found under rotten bark and in decaying stumps, and Triplax russica also occurred. In Newhall Wood, near Lincoln, Hesperia paniscus was very early, and was nearly over at the time at which it often appears for the first time; it is possible there may be a double brood this year.—W. W. FowteEr, Lincoln: June 20¢h, 1893. A New Catalogue of British Coleoptera, compiled by Dr. Sharp and the Rev. Canon Fowler, has just been published by Messrs. L. Reeve and Co.—Eps. Anosia Plexippus (Danais Archippus) in the Atlantic.—I have recently had occasion to show that the extraordinary immigration of Danais Archippus to our southern and south-western shores must have been effected by direct flight across the Atlantic from North America, the route with shorter sea passages from Brazil by the Cape de Verde Islands, the Canaries, and South-Eastern Europe, being ex- cluded from probability by the fact that all the D. Archippus taken here appear to belong to the North American type and not to the variety leucogyne of South America. This view is further confirmed by the fact, that not more than three specimens were recorded as having been noticed on the Continent of Europe as against twenty-eight captured or seen in this country. This view has just received unexpected confirmation. While at Glasgow a few weeks ago, Mr. J. J. F. X. King showed me several specimens of D. Archippus of the North American type, which had been given him by an officer on one of the vessels trading from Glasgow to New York. These specimens had been taken— somewhere about the year 1880, the exact date was not preserved—on board the vessel on its voyage out, upon the Atlantic, at a distance of from 200 to 300 miles from the British shores. They were playing about the rigging of the vessel, and the captor, who was not an entomologist, supposed them to be British insects. There can, I think, be no doubt that these were a portion of a migratory swarm on its way here. Yet it is curious that no specimens appear to have been seen in Ireland. —Cuas. G. Barrer, 39, Linden Grove, Nunhead, S.H.: May, 1893. On a variety of Thecla rubi.—I noticed in the last number of his new work Mr. Barrett mentions Thecla rubi being taken in Norfolk with a black oval spot. This form occurs quite as freely as the white spotted form on Cannock Chase, and I never thought it was anything out of the way. This insect feeds here on bilberry (Vaccinium myrtil'us), and I have occasionally beaten it from birch, round which trees the perfect insect is very fond of flying. The caterpillar is fond of eating its brother’s fresh pupa, thus resembling 7. w-album.—RicHARD FREER, Rugeley, Staffordshire: May 20th, 1893. Aporia crategi introduced.—When visiting the larve breeding ground of Mr. Edmonds, at Windsor, which is a most interesting place to visit, his manager, Mr. Cyril Bowen, mentioned to me that he had for some years past imported Aporia 164 (July, crategi from the continent, and had allowed numbers of them to escape, but he had never found them breed there until last year, though he had regularly looked for them. Last year, however, he took a number of the butterflies in a field which he pointed out to me, close to where their progenitors had been turned out. This year, I believe, he had not found them up to June 19th; but perhaps it is too early for them, notwithstanding the forwardness of the season.—F. MERRIFIELD, Brighton : June, 1898. [This information has an important bearing as regards some remarks by me in our last No.—R. McLacutan]. Early appearance of Satyrus Janira and Hesperia Acteon.—On May 26th I went down to the Burning Cliff and saw both S. Janira and H. Acteon on the wing. JL. sinapis and E. glyphica appeared here on May 2nd.—C. W. Dats, Glanvilles Wootton: June 7th, 1893. Note on Hesperia Acteon.—This little butterfly is more widely spread on the Dorset coast than Mr. McLachlan’ imagines. I have taken it in six different localities, from Punfield Cove, near Swanage, to Preston Coast Guard Station, two miles from Weymouth. It also occurs on the range of hills running through Pur- beck, and on the Ridgeway Hill near Upwey. It has also been recorded as being taken near Lyme Regis, Sidmouth, Torquay, and Truro. The earliest and latest dates of its appearance are May 26th, 1893, and September 15th, 1890. As long as collectors confine themselves to the second brood, I do not think it will become extinct.—ID. Leucophasia sinapis near Reading.—This sunny spring has been very favourable for Leucophasia sinapis ; they were in great force here. Morning up till about 10.30 or so, and afternoon when the sun begins to lose power, is the time they fly ; in the hottest part of the day they retire to the thicket to rest or take a nap. Slowly and lazily they thread their way, low down, in the thickest part of the wood where one could hardly walk, and where it is impossible to use the net, but continually popping out and flying along the rides, or stopping to hang on to the flowers of Orobus tuberosus, where they are the easiest things imaginable to catch. Look up and down a ride in the morning they are always in view—half a dozen in the net at a time with ease; a hundred might soon be taken. Pretty little things they are, and vary nicely—black tips, grey tips more or less, and sometimes altogether white. Large thickly wooded tracts and dense undergrowth seem to afford this weakly species a necessary protection ; it is here only they are to be found in abundance.— W. Hotanp, Southampton Street, Reading: June, 1893. Lepidoptera in South Wales.— Early in May I was down at Swansea, and insects were early there as here at home. Melitea Artemis was unusually abundant, up hill and down, parks, meadows, commons, lanes, and sandhills—Artemis was every- where; a larger form than those from Reading, with dark yellowish interspaces where ours are almost white. One afternoon I paid a visit to the extensive sandhills above Swansea to look up larve of Leucania littoralis. Aspilates citraria was plentiful here, starting freely from the hummocks and the dwarf sallow in the 1893.] i 165 - afternoon sunshine. Hypsipetes impluviata among the alders—beautifully variable too, black and greenish-black—forms which if placed alone in a box, without the more ordinary ones, would puzzle any one. But L. littoralis, how abundant to be sure! nearly full fed. On the sand rush after dark we collected some four or five hundred on a comparatively few hummocks, and considering there were miles of these hummocks, the number of the larvee must be enormous. We carried them away in a large muslin sleeve, from which they immediately began to bite their way out. The work vroved interesting, and I lost| my train. The house where I slept that night was on the side of a hill, and in the morning I stepped out of my bedroom window on to a hillside covered with a small wood, chiefly beech, which served to amuse me till time for the early train into Swansea. A colony of Tephrosia biundu- laria was here, about eighty per cent. of which were beautiful black, or brown-black, with intermediates of grey or greyish-brown down to the ordinary pale form, these latter proving quite rare. A fine female Stauropus fagi also was on one of the small trees. A day or so after I found several more fagi among some beeches a mile or so further on. Macroglossa bombyliformis was common in meadows near Swansea, flying to flowers of Pedicularis and Ajuga. Chelonia plantaginis common in the same meadows, almost my first acquaintance with this species, strange to say. The queer little Hydrelia unca starting up from the rushes and long grass in the damper parts, never till the sun was out. Nola cristulalis, commoner than at Reading, more black biundularia, and dark forms of 7. punctulata, on the trees near, are perhaps worth mentioning. A friend who was out with me one day took a Sesia sphegifor- mis in an alder plantation ; I had not heard of it for Wales before. One thing seems to be always abundant at Swansea, that is Bombyx rubi. Every year when I go down there is B. rubi rushing about Sketty Park and the fields around it, each night for the last hour and a half before the sun goes down—not one moth now and then, but lively groups in mad career. The larve of this species feed with us on heath, but at Swansea they probably feed on the coarse grass so abundant there, among which I have taken the female at dusk laying its eggs. Capt. Robinson had grand success with his moth traps during my stay; they kept him in almost a constant supply of rarities, good species and varieties difficult to be got in other ways. One night he had the greater part of the Prominents, besides other good things. Moth traps will not work with me living in the town where there are so many lights, but any one living where they can place the traps in a good wild place near a wood, like Capt. Robinson’s is, should rig some up at once—there is no doubt about the success.—Ib. A gynandromorphous Smerinthus populi.—On May 24th, from one of my pup which I had kept all the winter, a poplar hawk moth (S. populi) emerged, which was neither male nor female, but both ; on its left side it had a male antenna and a small wing like the male, on the right side a female antenna and a large wing like the female. The under wings were crippled, and one was covered by a small bit of membrane. Can you explain this ?—S. C. Brown, 10, Pevensey Road, St. Leonards- on-Sea: May 31sé, 1893. [The piece of membrane on the hind-wing was a fragment of that enveloping the moth within the pupa skin, and from which it had not freed itself in emerging. —Hps. }. J P 166 . (July, Argyrolepia Baumanniana near Basingstoke.—Taking the advice of a friend to * try for Argyrolepia Baumanniana amongst Scabiosa succisa, I did so by brushing about amongst it in the daytime, and so obtained a few, but by going over the same ground in the evening between 6 and 8 o’clock, I found that they were disturbed very readily, and I netted about two dozen in half an hour, whereas, in the day, I could only obtain half a dozen after a couple of hours’ work. It was only amongst S. succisa they were to be obtained, which plant grew in such abundance that it was almost the only plant, except coarse grass, that was to be found ; other places in the same locality where the Scabious was scarce failed to produce A. Baumanniana, which fact seems to point to S. suecisa as a probable food-plant.—A. H. Hamm, 24, Hatherly Road, Reading: June, 1893. Sesia sphegiformis at Basingstoke.—Whilst brushing about amongst Scabiosa succisa for Argyrolepia Baumanniana near Basingstoke on May 21st, my attention was attracted to what I thought was a large black Ichneumon, which was hovering round a stem of alder some three or four inches from the ground, and it was not until it alighted for a moment that I recognised it as a clearwing ; however, it gave me no time for reflection, for it was off and round another alder stem in the same way, when I fortunately bagged it, and, to my surprise, found I had netted a fine Sesia sphegiformis. I at once began to look for it in earnest, but several hours’ work did not produce any more. I spent the greater part of next day in looking for it, but did not take another, although I saw one but unfortunately missed it ; however, it must have been fairly plentiful, for the empty pups cases could be found readily enough sticking out of the alder stems about three or four inches from the ground, and several times I found two in one stem.—ID. Some early dates.—The following imagos I have myself either captured or bred :—*Cilix spinula, April 3rd; *Rumia crategata, April 19th; Venilia macu- lata, May 3rd ; Hadena oleracea, May 4th; *Hadena pisi, May 8th; Plusia chrysitis, May 9th ; Melanthia ocellata, May 12th; Emmelesia albulata, May 14th ; *Aretia Oaja, June 5th ; Plusia pulehrina, June 10th; Noctua augur (quite worn), June 15th; Cidaria fulvata (worn), June 17th; *Cosmia trapezina, June 13th. Those marked * are bred. I have to-day (June 18th) a larva of Vanessa Atalanta hung up preparatory to changing toa pupa!—P. L. Basrneton, Walmer House, Tonbridge : June 18th, 1893. Vespa arborea, Sm., in Ireland.—A number of female wasps, captured in April and May by Mr. R. M. Barrington near Bray, Co. Wicklow, and kindly forwarded by him, included, besides numerous Vespa vulgaris, V. rufa and V. norvegica, a single V. sylvestris and two examples of the rare V’. arborea. This species has not yet been recorded as Irish. Like many northern and mountain forms it may prove not uncommon in this country if looked for. The only British species of Vespide now unknown in Ireland is V. crabro, the hornet.—Gzro. H. CARPENTER, Science and Art Museum, Dublin: June, 1893. [I have seen these examples, and they certainly are Vespa arborea; still it is a very curious fact that both worker and male are unknown. The # is certainly a 1893. | | 167 distinct enough from our other species ; it is most closely allied to rufa, as the ab- domen has the somewhat shining surface and the black hairs which belong to that species, but it has also the basal segment distinctly longer, in fact as long as that of germanica, the markings not inclining to brown at their edges, and the clypeus marked as in that species, although its anterior angles are produced as in rufa. It differs, however, from either in having the scape of the antenne flavous in front; this last character allies it to the tree wasps, sylvestris and norvegica, but the absence of the extended cheek between the eye and the mandible separates it at once from either of these. I have oftened wondered if these females could be a cross between sylvestris and rufa, but if they were I think the cheek would probably be interme- diate in length between the two, whereas, in no case have I found it longer than in normal rufa. If entomologists in the districts from which arborea has been recorded would carefully search for workers with short cheeks and yellow fronted scapes, this species might become better understood, at present it remains more or less a mystery ; the female is so like the other species that it might easily be passed over, and the worker no doubt is similar to it except in size. —E. Saunpers, St. Ann’s, Woking]. Early dates for Hymenoptera.—About Woking several Hymenoptera have put in, as far as I know, unprecedentedly early appearances this year. Megachile cir- cumcineta § was taken as early as April 27th; Megachile Willughbiella g occurred on May 38rd ; Pompilus gibbus May 3rd; Formica rufa, 8 and 9, the latter winged, in some numbers May 4th. These for this country are, I believe, quite phenomenal dates; nearly all these species would naturally appear about June.—Epwarp SaunpDers, St. Ann’s, Woking: May 14th, 1893. Lecanium robiniarum, Doug.—Recently, Mr. C. H. Tyler Townsend sent from Tas Cruces, New Mexico, several scales of a ZLecanium, which were doing much injury to Robinia pseudacacia there; and these proved to be quite identical with L. robiniarum, described from specimens from Hungary (cf. Ent. Mo. Mag., i, n. s., p- 318), where also they do much damage to the Robinia. This tree being a native of the United States, the Coccid in New Mexico may be considered as in its native land, and it has, doubtless, been transported with the tree to Hungary, where it appears to flourish. Mr. Newstead having made examples from each country the subjects of com- parative examination, finds that the original description may be amended by adding “ Legs long, slender; tibie and tarsi of nearly equal length; trochanter with a long hair; digitules of the tarsi slender, of the claws stronger and dilated at the base. Derma with a very fine reticulation and numerous clear cellular spaces ; the reticula- tion, however, is very easily obliterated in caustic potash, and disappears in some places entirely after mounting in Canada balsam.”—J. W. Dovenas, Lewisham: June 8th, 1898. Ieerya egyptiaca, Doug., in India.—A number of specimens of this destructive Coccid were collected by Miss Tomlin near Madras during December, 1892, and were recently forwarded to me, with several other species, for investigation. Knowing how very destructive the species has been to orange trees in Alexandria, I forwarded Peg 168 [July, specimens to Mr. Cotes, Calcutta, and some parasites which hatched from them during transit to Professor Riley, of Washington. The latter has kindly replied :— “The fact of the occurrence of Icerya egyptiaca in India is very interesting and important, and the parasites which Miss Tomlin sent were examined with bated breath. Most unfortunately, however, instead of being primary parasites they are secondary, and the whole series belongs to an apparently undescribed species of the genus Tetrastichus, all of the species of which are hyper-parasites, so far as I know.” I cannot give the name of the food-plant, but hope Mr. Cotes will be able to make this out from the specimens sent. Miss Tomlin says the species is very common, but local ; therefore, every care should be exercised on the part of the authorities to prevent its spread.—R. Newsreap, Chester: May, 1893. Cicada (Cicadetta) montana in the New Forest.—The dry, hot weather of the last two seasons appears to have been favourable to the above insect (commonly known as Cicada hematodes), of which I have recently taken two specimens, and seen a few others which I failed to net. I have also obtained ten more from a local collector, but these were taken last year. I have been constantly collecting about the Forest during the past nine or ten years, but have never met with the insect before. It flies among the common brake (Pteris aquilina), but has a habit of dropping down suddenly, so unless you keep your eye on the exact spot they are difficult to catch.—F. C. Apams, Fern Cottage, Lyndhurst : June 10th, 18938. The prevention of mould in collections.—As I fancy the climate here is quite as damp as that of New Zealand, I venture to answer Mr. Maskell’s query with regard to prevention of mould, although I have no experience of Coceids, except as a blight on tea. I first clean the insects with a camel hair brush, and then apply benzine ; this is the only thing I have found of any use at all. A fresh application of benzine is necessary every two months or so. Further, during damp weather I keep an oil stove alight underneath the stand my insect boxes are on. For show cases coral lime is very effective, but it requires renewing as soon as it has crumbled to powder. I have used benzine for Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, also for leaf and stick insects.—P. E. RaputEy, Marguerita, Maturatta, Ceylon: April 24th, 18938. The Hope Professorship.—Mr. H. B. Poulton, M.A., F.R.S., has been appointed to this Chair to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Professor Westwood.—EDs. Reviews. JAHRESBERICHT DES WIENER ENTOMOLOGISCHEN VEREINES, iii, 1892 (1893). Vienna: published by the Society ; London: Williams and Norgate. In our Vol. for 1891, p. 107, we alluded to the establishment of an Entomolo- gical Society in Vienna, and noticed its first yearly Report. The Society is making good progress; there are now 65 Members, and the Report for 1892 extends to 70 pages with a coloured plate, as against 31 pages in 1891. As before, the contents 1893. } : 169 chiefly concern Lepidoptera; there is what amounts to a Monograph of the native species of Parnassius by Rebel and Rogenhofer, with full details on localities and local variation ; the plate illustrating it is excellent. Tx Bop Mors: by Marx Vernon SLINGERLAND ; being Bulletin 50 of the Cornell University Experiment Station. Published by the University, Ithaca, N.Y. 1893. We notice this paper, partly because it is by an author whose name we do not seem to-have previously come across, and partly in order to show how exhaustively any subject connected with Economic Entomology is worked out in the United States. The structure, life-history, ravages, and means of prevention occupy 29 closely printed 8vo pages, with many cuts in the text. We may as well add that the “ Bud Moth” is no other than Hedya ocellana of English Lists, that it was first noticed in America about 1841, and that it has since become a most formidable enemy of the apple crop. BUTTERFLIES OF THE RiviERA, Second Edition: by Frank Bromitow, F.E.S. 8vo, pp. 183. Nice: The Galignani Library. 1893. We noticed the 1st Edition in our issue for October, 1892, and said that it seemed likely to supply a want. That it has done so is proved by the necessity for a second edition following so soon on the first. The plan is the same in both, but the more recent edition contains additional species, and information as to localities, food-plants, &c. The author is an enthusiastic young entomologist. Tue Frerp Natvraist’s Hanpzoox, Fifth Edition: by the late Rev. J. G. Woop and the Rev. THEODORE Woop. London: Cassell and Co. pp. 167. 1893. This is a Calendar, and concerns British Lepidoptera, Plants and Birds’ Eggs. That it has reached a fifth edition proves there is a demand for Calendars, and be- ginners living in the country will no doubt find it useful. It is perfect in its getting up, and the “ Introduction’ and remarks are an improvement on those occurring in the earlier editions. Nature laughs at Calendars! Let any one compare the results for April, 1893, with the averaged statistics in a Calendar! Obituary. Francis Polkinghorne Pascoe, F.L.S., &c.—With great regret we announce the death of this well-known entomologist on June 20th, aged 79. He had been in bad health for some time. A more extended notice wili appear in our next issue. John Charles Bowring, F.L.S8., died at his residence, Forest Farm, Windsor Forest, on June 20th, aged 72. He was the eldest son of Sir John Bowring, whose name was at one time prominent in connection with our diplomatic relations with China, and was, himself, for some time partner in the great Chinese commercial firm of Jardine, Matheson and Co. He was an ardent entomologist, and formed a large collection of Coleoptera, but, from his retiring habits, he was little known outside the circle of his intimate acquaintances. 170 ‘ae (July, Societies. BrrMingHAM Entomotoaican Soctuty: May 15th, 1893.—Mr. R. C. BrapDuiey, Vice-President, in the Chair. Mr. G. W. Wynn showed Acherontia Atropos from Cannock Chase. Mr. A. H. Martineau said that at Solihull a specimen of Sphina ligustri had entered a hive and been killed by the bees; the bees then, unable to remove so large a body, had covered it up with wax. The Secretary announced the receipt from Mr. John Willis, of Edgbaston, of a handsome present of books, about 40 volumes; and a cordial vote of thanks was passed to Mr. Willis for his kind gift. WHITsUNTIDE Excursion.—An excursion was made to the Cotswolds at Whit- suntide, when, under the kind guidance of Mr. Frank Stephens, of Ebley, a pleasant three days were spent in the neighbourhood of Stroud by the few members who attended. Lycena Adonis and Ino Geryon were common amongst the Lepidoptera, and a number of interesting Diptera and Hymenoptera were taken. The most noteworthy capture was, perhaps, that of Cheilosia chrysocoma, one of which was taken near Painswick.—CoLBRAan J. WAINWRIGHT, Hon. Sec. THe South Lonpon EntomotoeicaL AND Natura History SOcrmEery: May 11th, 1893. —Cuas. G. Barrett, Esq., Vice-President, in the Chair. Mr. R. South exhibited a series of Diurnea fagella, Fb., from Buckinghamshire, the light and dark forms being about equal in number. Mr. South said that the trees in the wood in which they were taken were darker on their western side than on their eastern, and at the time he collected these specimens the wind was in the east, and most of the moths were at rest on the western side of the trees, the dark insects being inconspicuous, and he thought that if this often happened when this species was on the wing, it would, by natural selection, tend to produce a darker race. Mr. Barrett, in referring to the breeding of Bombyx castrensis, L., in captivity, said the larve should be well wetted at times and exposed when possible to the sun, and he thought the absence of the latter in some years might account for the un- certain appearance of this species. Mr. Turner said that he had bred B. castrensis very successfully on rose leaves dipped in salt water, the discussion being continued by Messrs. Tutt, Frohawk and South. Mr. Adye exhibited a long series each of Moma Orion, Esp., Hurymene dolobraria, L., Amphidasis betularia, L., Hylophila prasinana, L., &c., the majority having been bred in March and April indoors, from larve taken in the New Forest last autumn. Mr. Tutt said that on May 6th Lycena bellargus, Rott., was on the wing in Kent, also Nemeophila plantaginis, L., Euclidia glyphica, L., &., whilst pups and larve of Vanessa urtice, L., were reported for the same date. Mr. Jager mentioned that Cidaria truncata, Hufn., was now emerg- ing, and Mr. South said he had bred Coccyx strobilana, Hb., from the spruce fir in Buckinghamshire.— F. W. Hawes and H. Wituiams, Hon. Secs. May 25th, 1893.—J. JenneR Weir, Hsq., F.L.S., President, in the Chair. Mr. Adkin exhibited a bred series of Cidaria suffumata, Hb., from Forres, with bred series from Dover and Box Hill for comparison; also a bred series of Lobo- phora carpinata, Bork. (lobulata, Hb.), from Rannoch, including one extreme banded form, with southern series for comparison. Mr. Gerrard, a specimen of 1893.] ; ial Syrichthus malve, I. (alveolus, Hb.), var. fritillum, W. V., from Epping. Mr. C. G. Barrett, a box containing more than twenty species of the Psychide from the continent of Europe, and especially desired to gain further information with regard to these little known and obscure insects. Mr. Weir remarked that all the species seemed excessively local, and gave his experience with P. villosella, Och., stating that the female did not leave the case, that the eggs were laid and hatched within this shelter, and that most likely the first meal of the young larve was the body of their mother. Mr. West, of Streatham, on behalf of Mr. Trenerry, a maJe and female of Pieris Daplidice, L., captured by a boy at Plymouth, also a specimen of Smerinthus tili@, Li., in which the rosy tint was very strongly developed, making a very beautiful var. Mr. Turner, a long series of Hybernia leucophearia, Schiff., from varieties with but few markings on a light ground, to forms which were very dark with the transverse lines obliterated, selected from various localities near South London ; a specimen of Panolis piniperda, Panz., from Westerham, in which green was the prevailing colour; also hibernated specimens of Pterophorus monodactylus, L., taken on February 18th of this year. Mr. Warne, a nodule of kauri gum from New Zealand, enclosing a large longicorn beetle. Mr. Weir, a species of Hippobos- cide. taken from an exhausted house-martin (Chelidon urbica, L.), most likely Stenopteryx hirundinis ; also a mass of eggs and young larve from the wild rose (Rosa canina), which appeared to be those of Hemerophila abruptaria, Thnb.; he earnestly requested members to make notes of all unusual occurrences during the present phenomenal season, and report to the Society the results of their observations and experiences. Mr. Adkin remarked that a considerable number of species had appeared in his breeding cages, which had been two years or more in pupa. Mr. Perks showed a large specimen of a Polyporus, full of Coleopterous larve, taken at the Society’s field meeting at Horsley. Mr. Turner then read the Report of the Society's field meeting at Horsley, on May 13th, which had been so successful and enjoyable.—Hy. J. Turner, Acting Secretary. June 8th, 1893.—The President in the Chair. Mr. F. W. Frohawk exhibited a variety of Melitea Aurinia, Rott., a most remarkable form, especially on the under-side, the normal orange-tawny colouring being replaced by fulvous-brown, and the markings of the outer half of the secondaries being almost entirely missing, also a somewhat similar aberration of the same species on behalf of Mr. Carpenter. Mr. H. A. Auld exhibited a specimen of Spilosoma urtice, Esp., which was deficient in the usual row of black spots down the centre of the body ; also a bred series of Phibalapteryx vitalbata, Hb. Mr. R. Adkin showed a series of Asteroscopus nubeculosa, Esp., from Rannoch, bred in 1893, two being from larvee fed up in 1890, and the remainder in 1891; he said it was not uncommon for this species to remain two years in the pupa. Mr. Weir referred to the view held by some, that certain species resisted any forcing when pup, and instanced the second brood of Pieris napi, L., in this respect; Mr. Barrett stating it was of the utmost importance that a species like A. nubeculosa should have the power of delaying emergence should the weather be too unfavour- able. Mr. Weir exhibited a specimen of Aporia crategi, L., one of four taken by him in the early part of June, 1839, at Keymer, Sussex, it being then abundant. In 1840, in the same locality he saw but one, and in subsequent years none at all. 172 (July, 1893. This specimen he generously placed in the Society’s collection. Mr. Weir also said that large numbers of this species, bred from continental pups, had been liberated in the neighbourhood of Windsor. Mr. Frohawk recorded the occurrence of Limenitis Sibylla, L., so early as May 22nd.—F. W. Hawzs and H. WItLiAms, Hon. Secretaries. EntTomotoaican Society or Lonpon: June 7th, 1893.— Henry -Joun Ewes, Hsq., F.L.S., F.Z.S., President, in the Chair. Mr. George Willis Kirkaldy, of St. Abbs, Worple Road, Wimbledon, S.W., was elected a Fellow of the Society. Mr. W. C. Boyd exhibited varieties of Fidonia piniaria and Thecla rubi, taken at Bournemouth on May 20th, 1893. Mr. C. O. Waterhouse exhibited two galls, one on the stem and the other on the leaf of an oak from Durango, Mexico, respecting which he asked for information ; the one on the stem proved to be the gall of Cynips guatemalensis: the other, which resembled a sponge, was unknown. Mr. A. Cowper Field exhibited varieties of Smerinthus tilie, bred between 1890 and 1893, under varying conditions of temperature, those which had been exposed to a lower temperature being much darker than those which had been exposed to a higher. Mr. Merrifield made some observations on the subject, and remarked that, as far as his experience went, no hard and fast rule could be laid down with regard to the production of the lighter or darker colourings, as a high temperature some- times produced dark forms. Mr. W. M. Christy exhibited a series of Zygena trifolii, including very many yellow forms, all, with one exception, taken at one spot during the latter half of May, 1893, and belonging to one colony. Some of the specimens were more or less incomplete, both in structure and colour, and Mr. Barrett stated as his opinion that this was due to their having been forced by the unusually fine weather. Lord Walsingham, Mr. Merrifield, and others took part in the discussion which followed. Canon Fowler exhibited cocoons and specimens of Coniatus suavis, var. chryso- chlora, Luc., taken by Lord Walsingham in great abundance on the flower-shoots of tamarisk in the West of Italy. Mr. Chitty exhibited black varieties of the following Coleoptera from the slopes of Ben Cruachan, N.B.:—Carabus violaceus and arvensis, Pterostichus versicolor Phyllopertha horticola, and Telephorus figuratus, and stated that the latter seemed a permanent race, as it occurred both in 1892 and 1893. The President remarked on the great abundance of Coleophora laricella in Gloucestershire, and stated that they were committing great ravages among young larches. Lord Walsingham stated that he had seen young larches at Carlsbad completely bleached by this moth. It was suggested by several Fellows of the Society that care should be taken to observe the occurrence of second broods of insects during the year. Mons. Wailly exhibited a collection of Lepidoptera, Coleoptera,and Orthoptera from New Zealand. A discussion followed, in which Lord Walsingham, Dr. Sharp, Mr. McLachlan, Mr. Durrant, and others took part. Mons. Wailly further exhibited cocoons of various silk-producing Lepidoptera, and stated that the larva of Attacus Perny?, whose food-plant is oak, had been reared in Trinidad on Yerminalia latifolia.—W. W. Fownrr, Hon. Secretary. August, 1893! é 173 THE LATE MR. STAINTON’S COLLECTIONS, &e. BY THE RIGHT HON. LORD WALSINGHAM, M.A., F.RS., &c. Mrs. Stainton having, as already announced (ante p. 111), gene- rously presented to the Trustees of the British Museum the whole of her late husband’s collections of Lepidoptera, together with his entomological correspondence and unpublished drawings illustrating the larve and life-histories of Micro- Lepidoptera, it may be interesting to his many friends and correspondents among entomologists to know that these are now accessible to students at the Natural History Museum. The collections are contained in seven cabinets and numerous boxes, the contents of the latter being for the most part duplicates or speci- mens not coming within the range of his special studies. These boxes have been carefully examined, and a selection has been made of such of their contents as may, at some future time, be usefully incorporated with the existing National series ; these and others selected from among miscellaneous and unarranged specimens have been placed for the time in the empty drawers of a large cabinet containing a great number of interesting European and exotic Vineide, many of which have been the subjects of Mr. Stainton’s published contributions to science. There was already in this cabinet much unnamed and unarranged material received from various correspondents, among whom may be mentioned Belfrage, who collected in Texas about 1870; Bates, whose expedition to the Amazons yielded rich results; Atkin- son, who, in the neighbourhood of Caleutta, carefully observed the life-histories of many species; Petersen, from Colombia; Trimen, from the neighbourhood of Cape Town; Eaton, from Portugal and the south of France; Hudson, from New Zealand; and many others. There are also many species received from Brackenridge Clemens at about the time when Mr. Stainton edited the papers of that author in his volume on the “ Tineina of North America;” with a considerable number of named specimens from Chambers, Boll, and others, which should be useful in the identification of insufficiently described and never fully recognised North American Tineide. The actual types described by Mr. Stainton in his Indian, Australian and African papers in the Transactions of the Entomological Society are also found in good condition. It has been determined, after making an inventory, to keep the contents of this cabinet for the present undisturbed, although it is hoped that they may be incorporated from time to time in the future Q 174 [ August, together with other material: for instance, my own collection (in- cluding that of the late Professor Zeller) left by my will to the Museum; the Grote collection, still untouched as regards the or- tricide and Tineide; and the Frey collection, lately purchased by the Trustees. It seems important to maintain intact the whole British series of Macro and Micro-Lepidoptera, seeing that these form a counterpart to his well-known Manual, still in constant use. The European collection of Tineide contains a number of types as well as many series of specimens received direct from the authors by whom the species were first described, and which are, therefore, extremely valuable as co-types, or at least as having been compared with the originals. This collection far surpasses anything of the kind now in the possession of the Trustees. One of the conditions on which the collection is presented is that this, as well as the British series, should remain undisturbed. To sum up shortly, the conditions which will attach to these collections, as resulting from a consultation with Messrs. Douglas and McLachlan, who represented Mrs. Stainton, are as follows :—First, the whole British series will be kept intact ; secondly, the European Tineide will also be kept untouched. These will be immediately accessible to students in the Insect Room at the Natural History Museum, It is the Donor’s wish that these collections shall be distinctly labelled and known as “the Stainton Collection,” and kept as a memorial of her late husband’s name and work. Thirdly, the exotie Micro- Lepidoptera with some others will remain for the present in a cabinet accessible only to those who are specially interested in study- ing them. They may be gradually worked out and incorporated from time to time, but in all cases where a specimen is removed from any cabinet or box it will be labelled as from the Stainton Collection, the name (if any) under which he placed it being also recorded on the label. Fourthly, the miscellaneous contents of one cabinet and several boxes may be at once incorporated, the duplicates being available for gift or exchange in the same way as other duplicates are dealt with in the Natural History Department. It is intended that a catalogue shall be made of the arranged portions of the collection, stating the names and numbers of the speci- mens of each species represented according to their present sequence, and that this shall also be available for the use of students. London: June 19th, 1898. 1893. | : 175 DICHRORAMPHA ALPESTRANA, H.-S., AN ADDITION TO THE BRITISH LIST. BY A. THURNALL. On the evening of June 22nd, 1892, I captured in Epping Forest - a fine specimen of Argyrotoxa Audouinana ; this being a species much wanted, I visited the spot again on the 26th, but after beating for some time, I gave it up in disgust, and turned my attention to the rough herbage growing in an open marshy spot, and was soon rewarded by the capture of a small Dichrorampha, which I at once saw was new to our list. In the course of half an hour I captured about a dozen, most of them worn, sitting upon the stems of Juncus glomeratus and Aira cespitosa. From observations made at the time I felt sure that the larva would be found feeding on the roots of the “ sneezewort ” (Achillea ptarmica, Linn.), and accordingly paid a visit to the spot on March 11th last, soon after the present dry season had set in, and speedily found my surmise correct. The half-dozen larve dug up on that occasion were very snugly hidden away in neat little cocoons attached to the bark of the roots of the above-named plant, and may be very briefly described as—bone-white with light brown heads. They appeared to have been feeding im and wpon the rather long underground suckers, often four or five inches below the surface, much in the same way as Halonota trigeminana larve teed on the roots of Senecio. They must have an exceedingly moist time of it, as the spot where they occur is over one’s shoe tops in semi-liquid clay for months at atime! ‘They changed to pupe very early in May, and on the 29th a fine 2? emerged. I found, on paying a visit to the spot on June 4th, that the imagos were well out. J'rom their small size and dull colours they are very difficult to see, and I found the best plan was to search the stems of Juncus and Aira, which are generally to be found wherever the food- plant grows: they run up the stems to expand and dry their wings just as D. alpinana does on the stems of tansy. The plants must not be shaken when searching, as on the least alarm they dive down and are lost in the herbage. Doubtless the insect will turn up in many places where its food-plant occurs. lam indebted to Lord Walsingham (through Mr. H. Bankes) for the name. The following is a brief description of the imago :— Head and thorax dark fuscous. Basal half of anterior wings very dark brown, the apical half very thickly irrorated with dark orange scales, an angulated blue line leaves the costa beyond the middle, reaching to the dorsal margin, or very nearly so. Still nearer the apex is a short blue line, which has, as a sort of continuation Q 2 176 [August, — to it, three conspicuous black dots. On the middle of the dorsal margin appears an oblong blotch, intersected by a fuscous line, and pointing obliquely towards the apical region. This blotch is only conspicuous in fine specimens, and is decidedly paler in colour than the orange marked apical portion of the wing. Hind-wings uniformly dark fuscous. A particularly “stumpy,” square looking insect, its markings putting one more in mind of Dichrorampha alpinana than any other species of the genus. 144, Chobham Road, Stratford New Town, E.: June 19th, 1893. NOTES CORRECTING THE SYNONYMY OF “DICHRORAMPHA” SUBSEQUANA, Hw.,IN WHICH DICHRORAMPHA ALPESTRANA, H.-S., IS WRONGLY INCLUDED IN STAUDINGER AND WOCKE’S CATALOGUE. BY THE RIGHT HON. LORD WALSINGHAM, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S. Early last February Mr. Bankes submitted to me some specimens of a Dichrorampha taken by Mr. Thurnall in Epping Forest, which differed from any recognised British species. I found them to agree well with Herrich-Schaffer’s figure of montanana (subsequently described and referred to in the text as Grapholitha alpestrana, H.-S.), which appears to be a species of Dichrorampha not at present well known on the continent and unrepresented in the Zeller Collection, except by a single female wrongly placed in the series of Lipoptycha plumbana, Se. The occurrence of this species here, and its addition to the British list, necessitates a careful revision of synonymy which presents ex- ceptional difficulties. The name alpestrana has been sunk as a synonym of subsequana, Hw., but the two species are not even congeneric, subseguana being a Steganoptycha, according to the generally accepted use of that genus. The reference to subseguana in Staudinger and Wocke’s Catalogue includes in its synonymy no less than four other names, all of which may be rightly applied to good and distinct species. I shall here attempt to clear up the confusion that has arisen therefrom. For this purpose it will be necessary to refer to three numbers in the above- mentioned Catalogue, which are as follows :— “1241 —apreGana Dup. IV. 83. 4. p. 409 (1842) ; abiegnana Z. Stett. EB. Z. 1849. 244; HS. 128. IV. p. 281; Hein. 217; ? pygmaeana Froel. No. 217.” “ 1243—MERCURIANA Hb. 322; Froel. No. 170; HS. 326. IV. p. 272; Hein. 218; monticolana W\k. 224; Stt. Man. 2. 249.” 1893. ] . WAH “1284—suUBSEQUANA Hw. Lep. Br. p. 448 (non HS.); ? Steph. Hl. IV. 186; ? Wd. 1021; monticolana Dup. IV. 83. 3; Hein. 235; montanana Dup. IV. 83.7; HS.193; alpestrana HS. IV. p. 260; ? plumbagana Wik. 107; ? Stt. Man. 2. 215.” STEGANOPTYCHA SUBSEQUANA, Hw. Tortriz subsequana, Hw., Lip. Br., 448—9 (1812). = Grapholitha abiegana, Dp., Hist. Nat. Lp. Fr., Sppl., 1V, 409—10, pl. lxxxiii, 4, (1842). = Asthenia pygmeana, Wilk., Br. Tortr., 215—6 (1859); Stn., Man., II, 247 (1859). Warren, Ent. Mo. Mag., XXIV, 6—8 (1887), having examined Haworth’s original specimens of swbsequana in the British Museum, found them to be identical with abiegana, Dp., and came to the con- clusion that the pygmeéana of Wilk. and Stn. (nec Hb.), was the saine species. The corrected synonymy of this species is therefore as fol- lows :-— 1241—suBsEQuANA, Hw., Lp. Br., 448—9 (1812); Stgr. & Wk. (partim) Cat. Lp. Eur., II, No. 1284 (1871) ; Wrn., Ent. Mo. Mag., XXIV, 6—8 (1887) ; Stn., Ent. Mo. Mag., XXIV, 8 (1887). = abiegana, Dp., Hist. Nat. Lp. Fr., Sppl., 1V, 409—10, pl. Ixxxiii, 4 (1842) ; H.-S., Schm. Eur., IV, pl. xviii, 128 (1849) ; Stgr. & Wk., Cat. Lp. Eur., II, No. 1241 (1871) ; abiegnana, Z., Stett. Ent. Zeit., 1849, 244; H.-S., Schm. Eur., LV, 281 (1849) ; Hein., Schm. Deutsch. Tortr., 217—8 (1863). = pygmeana, Wilk., Br. Torty., 215—6 (1859) ; Stn., Man., II, 247 (1859) ; Brt., Ent. Mo. Mag., X, 246 (1874). ? = pygmeana, Frol., Enum. Tortr. Wiirt., 9J—1, No. 217 (1828), STEGANOPTYCHA MERCURIANA, Frdl. Tortria mercuriana, Frol., Enum. Tortr. Wirt., 73—4, No. 170 (1828) ; Hb., Tortr., 322 (1881). = Sericoris (Eudemis) subsequana, Stph., Ill. Br. Ent., Haust. IV, 136 (1834) ; Wa., Ind. Ent., 1021 (1839). = Coccyx monticolana, Dp., Hist. Nat. Lp. Fr., Sppl., IV, 408—9, pl. lxxxiii, 3 (1842). = Pamplusia alticolana, Stph., List. Br. An. B. M., X, Lp. 52, 100 (1852). Stephens, List Br. An. B. M., X, Lp. 52 (1852), referred his Sericoris ? subsequana, as also Wood’s figure 1021, to “ monticola, Mn.” Wood’s figure certainly represents monticolana (Mn. MS.), Dp., and Stephens was probably correct in considering his subseguana to be the same species. Coccyx monticolana, Dp., was erroneously considered by Heine- mann, Schm. Deutsch. Tortr., 235 (1863), as identical with alpestrana, H.-S., and Staudinger and Wocke (Cat. Lp. Eur., No. 1284), thinking 178 . {August, alpestrana a synonym of subsequana, Hw., referred monticolana, Dp., to that species. The original drawings (on vellum) of Godart aud Duponchel’s work are in the Merton/ Library ; ; they are as beautiful and accurate as the published plates are bad, indeed, it would be no exaggeration to say that better drawings have never been made, and I doubt if they have ever been equalled. ‘he figure of monticolana, Dp., represents undoubtedly the species known as mercuriana, Hb., and is indeed an excellent drawing of it. Hence it follows that monticolana, instead of being referred to subsequana, must sink as a synonym of mercuriana. Stainton was acquainted with the errors that had been made with regard to this insect. In the account of his second visit to the Enga- dine (Ent. Ann., 1871, 6), in recording the extreme abundance of Pamplusia monticolana, Dp., he adds the following note :-— “In Staudinger and Wocke’s Catalogue, Alpestrana, Hervich-Schiffer, is given as a synonym for the insect ; but Herrich-Schiffer’s insect is not the species I mean, which is quite recognizably figured by Duponchel in his fourth supplementary volume, pl. 83, f. 3, under the name of Coccyx monticolana, and has no affinities with the unicolorous Dichroramphe, to which Herrich-Schiaffer’s Alpestrana seems nearly related.” Stainton’s remark is certainly justified, for omitting the evidence now produced from an examination of the original drawing, Dupon- chel’s figure, though not good, “is quite recognizably figured,” and certainly does not look at all like a Dichrorampha. Barrett, Ent. Mo. Mag., IX, 26, 7 (1872), under the head Dichro- rampha plumbagana, Tr., calls attention to Dr. Wocke’s errors in Staudinger’s Catalogue, especially in his treatment of plumbagana, Wilk., but himself makes the mistake, which he repeats in a subsequent paper, Ent. Mo Mag., X, pp. 245, 247 (1874), of confounding subse- quana, Hw., with pygmeana, Ib., failing to recognise that pyymeana, Hb., is not the pygmeana of Wilkinson, although he rightly separates “ monticolana, Mun.,” from these species. Snellen, Vlind. v. Ned. Micr., 404 (1882), considered monticolana, Dp., synonymous with herhosana, Brt., but this is really tanacetz, Stn. The corrected synonymy of this species should be as follows :— 1243—MERCURIANA, Fr6l., Enum. Tortr. Wiirt., 73—4, No. 170 (1828): Samml., Eur. Schm. (text) Tortr., 11 (1831); Hb. (Gey.), Tortr., pl. li, 322 (1831) ; H.-S., Schm. Eur., 1V, 272—3, pl. xlvi, 326 (1849) ; Ld. Wien., Ent. Mts., ITT, 342 (1859) ; Hein., Schm. Deutsch. Tortr., 218—9 eee Steger. & Wk., Cat. Lp. Eur., 11, No. 1243 (1871). = subsequana, Stph., Ill. Br. Ent., Haust. IV, 1386 (1834); Wd., Ind. Ent., 1021 (1839) ; Stph., List. Br. An. B. M., X, Lp. 52 a 352). 1893.] 2 179 = monticolana, Dp., Hist. Nat. Lp. Fr., Sppl., [1V, 408—9, pl. ixxxili, 3 (1842) ; Wilk., Br. Tortr., 224 (1859) ; Stn., Man., II, 249 (1859) ; Dbld., Syn. List (2 edn.), 24 (1866); Stn., Ent. Ann, 1871,6; Brt., Ent. Mo. Mag., X, _ 247 (1874). = alpicolana, Stph., List. Br. An. B. M., X, Lp. 52, 100 (1852). = subsequana (partim), Steger. & Wk., Cat. Lp. Eur., II, No. 1284 (1871). Nore.—mercuriana has been wrongly attributed to Hubner as its author. It was figured in Geyer’s continuation of Hiibner’s work, and the accompanying text, dated “September, 1830,” is by Dr. Froélich. On p. 11, after the Latin description, we find the following reference-—“ Froel. En., p. 73, n. 170,” which proves that the text was published after Frélich’s “ Enumeratio.” Although the title accom- panying the text is dated 1830, it seems that this and the corresponding plates were not published until Aprin, 1831, for in the copy of Hubner in the Merton Library is the following note, evidently written at the time :— “en Avril, 1831, regu une partie de texte, et 4 planches nouvelles qui sont les 49, 50, 51 et 520.” And below this is written with a different pen— “du 20 Mars, 1834, regu la pl. 53.” Jacob Hiibner died on the 13th September, 1826. DicuRORAMPHA PLUMBAGANA, Tr. In Staudinger and Wocke’s Catalogue, under the name distinctana, Hein. (No. 1282), and again under subsequana, Hw., we find the two following references :—“ ? plumbagana W\k. 107 ; ? Stt. Man. 2. 215.” Why they are inserted in either of these places is not apparent, unless having made tanaceti, Stn. (which is a good species) a synonym of plumbagana, it was necessary to locate plumbagana, Wilk. and Stn., elsewhere, and being unable to find a satisfactory place, they were referred with a “?” to the species which precedes and the species which follows plumbagana in the Catalogue! Both Wilkinson and Stainton were rightly acquainted with plwm- bagana, Tr.,and to that species these two references must be removed. DIcHRORAMPHA MONTANANA, Dp. We have now eliminated from the swbseqguana of Staudinger’s Catalogue all but three references, which constitute two good species. Ephippiphora montanana, Dp., Hist. Nat. Lp. Fr., Sppl., IV, 418, pl. lxxxiii, 7 (1842). Grapholitha alpestrana, H.-8., Schm. Eur., IV, 260 (1849). = montanana, H.-S., pl. xxvii, 193. The only explanation that appears possible for regarding alpes- 180 . { August, trana, H.-S., as synonymous with montanana, Dp., is that Herrich- Schaffer figures the species under this name, which, however, he corrects in the text with the explanatory note, “ montanana, F. R. olim.” It is quite incomprehensible why montunana, Dp., has been con- sidered to be the same as munticolana, Dp. It is probably an instance of the confusion too often arising from too great similarity of specific names given by the same author, especially when described at the same time and figured on the same plate; the published figures even are entirely dissimilar, and neither montanana, Dp., nor monticolana, Dp., resembles the figure of a’pestrana, H.-S. (= montanana, F. R. MS.). The synonymy of these two species will, therefore, be as follows :— 1284—MonTANANA, Dp., Hist. Nat. Lp. Fr., Sppl., IV, 413, pl. lxxxiii, 7 (1842). = subsequana, Stgr. & Wk. (partim), Cat. Lp. Eur., II, No. 1284 (1871). 1284 (bis.)—ALPESTRANA, H.-S., Schm. Eur., IV, 260 (1849). = montanana, H.-S., Schm. Hur., LV, pl. xxvii, 193 (1849). = subsequana, Stgr. & Wk. (partim), Cat. Lp. Eur., II, No. 1284 (1871). ? = monticolana, Hein., Schm. Deutsch. Tortr., 235 (1868). The following is Herrich-Schiaffer’s description : —“ alpestrana, F. R.- montanana, F. R, olim.— Ent. Zeit , 1843, p. 143.—Sppl., 193. —6, L. “ Tuteseenti-grisea, lineis undique transversis undulatis pallidis, macula marginis interioris pallida, obsolete tripartita. Wie die kleinsten exemplare von Blepharana mit etwas schmaleren Fliigeln. Die hellgelbe, in Querlinien gehiufte Beschuppung verliert sich gegen die Wurzel kaum merklich und liasst die Farbe der Vorderfliigel graugelb erscheinen, viel lichter als bei Cacaleana und der verflogensten Exemplaren von Blepharana. Von beiden unterscheidet sie sich ausserdem durch die deutlichen lichten Querwellenlinien, welche bis zur Wurzel reichen und den, wenn auch nicht scharf begrenzten, doch deutlichen, lichten, dreitheiligen Innenrandsfleck. Die Bleilinen selten sehr auffalend, ganz wie bei Blepharana gestellt. Kopf und Palpen lehmgelb, letztere an den Randern braun. “Steyrische Alpen, Juni; bei Regensburg vom Juni bis August.” The addition to our British list recorded by Mr. Thurnall should probably be placed after alpz:nana and Petiverella, with which it agrees in possessing a costal fold in the male, which constitutes it a true Dichrorampha, in contradistinction to the genus Lipoptycha, as separated by Lederer. At some future time I shall have occasion to refer to other questions of synonymy as affecting the species included in the genera Dichrorampha and Lipoptycha. Merton Hall, Thetford : July, 1898. oe EES a 1893. | 181 VARIATION IN ZYGANA TRIFOLII. BY C. G. BARRETT, F.E.S. By an accident, a slight error appeared in the report of the Entomological Society’s meeting of the 7th ulto. It is there stated that I attributed the ill-developed and incomplete condition of certain specimens of Zygena trifolii “to the unusually hot weather.” This was not by any means what I intended to say. Consequently, it is necessary to make this correction, because the exhibition itself was one of extraordinary interest, and deserving of some further notice, more especially as Mr. W. M. Christy brought up the long and re- markable series of Z. trifoliz, then shown, at my request. It appears that in a wooded locality near his residence at Ems- worth, and on the Sussex side of the town, this insect has been extremely rare, hardly more than a casual specimen having been taken in previous years, but that this year it appeared there in great pro- fusion, some being normal 5-spotted specimens, others having the spots unusually small, others again with coalescing spots united in pairs or in blotches, some with the whole run into one long blotch ; others, again, were incomplete, as though portions of fore- and hind-wings had been cut off in curves, which, however, were quite uniform in each specimen, and also were exactly as the insects emerged from the pupa, one or two being even almost apterous. But perhaps the most interesting range of variations of all, was a series of yellow specimens —hind-wings and spots bright yellow—in some numbers, and showing the variations of the normal red forms in the completeness of separate spots, in their fusion in pairs, in blotches, and even in one instance showing the complete longitudinal stripe produced by coalescence of all the spots. This yellow form in Z. ¢rifolii is so rare in this country as to have been previously almost unknown, and it appeared worthy of notice that this striking aberration in colour should have appeared in the same large emergence of a rather isolated brood of the insect, as that which contained the incomplete specimens, thus clearly skowing that some abnormal condition had been at work. ‘The reference made to the heat of the present season was that it was merely a probable inducement to larve to feed up, which might otherwise have again hibernated. In this connection it may be well to mention that Mr. W. H. B, Fletcher, in the course of his singular and successful experiments in hybridizing and continuing the reproduction of hybrids in this genus, has discovered the remarkable fact that larve not unfrequently decline to feed up in the spring after the first hibernation, but, eating very 182 (August, little, settle down again and pass another winter in the same condition. This doubtless explains the sudden appearance of multitudes in a specially favourable season. 39, Linden Grove, Nunhead, S8.H.: July 11th, 1893. DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES OF ARCTIIDZ BELONGING TO THE GENUS ANAXITA, WALK. BY JUAN J. RODRIGUEZ. Anaxita DRUCcEI, n. sp. 6. Primaries similar to those of A. sannionis, Butler, but more brick-red in colour, the streaks and bands crossing the wing greyer and rather wider, the second band not joined to the first and broken into two towards the inner margin; the ground colour pure white instead of pale yellow, as in A. sannionis ; and the streak in the cell and the spot below it are larger. Under-side paler, similar to the upper: -side, but with the base and two spots on the costal margin black, the first spot small, the second large and extending partly across the wing. Secondaries black ; on the under-side a streak in the cell and a spot beyond it reddish-orange, the fringe black. Head, collar, and tegule pure white, the tegule edged with black; antennz black ; abdomen bright red. Expanse, 23 inches. Hab.: Guatemata (Mus. Rodriguez). This fine insect may be at once distinguished from either of the described species of the genus by the black hind-wings, and also by many minor differences pointed out in the description. It is more closely allied to A. sannionis, from Ecuador and Peru, than to the Mexican A. decorata, Walker. DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES OF SOUTH AFRICAN HOMOPTERA. BY W. L. DISTANT, F.E.S. LOcRIs CONCINNA, 2. sp. Head, anterior half of pronotum, scutellum, basal third of tegmina, abdomen above, body beneath, and legs, sanguineous ; posterior half of pronotum and central area of the tegmina pale stramineous ; two central spots to head, a transverse fascia on anterior area of pronotum, apical area—very irregularly defined—of tegmina, mesosternum, fascia to abdomen, and apices of the tarsal joints black; apical margin of the tegmina ochraceous, and apical black area irrorated with greyish-white ; wings pale hyaline, their apical margins fuscous. Long., includ. tegm., 10 mm. Hab.: S. Africa; Otiembora (Hrikkson); S. Afr. Mus., and Coll. Dist. This prettily marked species is very distinct from any other member of the genus, by its varied coloration and markings. Purley, Surrey: July, 1893. a a ee 1893. ] - 183 ON SOME NEW INDIAN HISTERIDZ AND A NOTE ON AISTER RUGISTRIUS, LEW. IW Er, GIB VIL, 1G Wis fo The genus Mponius was founded in 1885 on four species from Japan and published in the Trans. Ent. Soe. Lond., iii, p. 833. I then surmised that it was only reasonable to believe that other species would eventually be discovered in the Oriental region, and now two have been brought home by Dr. H. E. Andrewes from India, where they were captured by Mr. T. R. D. Bell in the Province of Kanara on the west coast. Dr. Andrewes says that “ Kanara is a large dis- trict covered with dense jungle, some of it evergreen, with good high forest in many parts. A portion of it is on the edge of the Deccan plain, 2000 feet above the sea,” and adds that his friend, Mr. Bell, “has collected principally at Yellarpur, and generally along the northern border of the district.” This is just the kind of country for the most interesting entomophagous beetles, and it can only be regarded as accidental that some of the large collections made recently in the east by Signor Fea, Mr. Doherty, and others have not contained species of this genus, as these travellers have passed over places in which the more important physical conditions are essentially the same. The first of the present species is remarkable in having no elytral strie, because the four Japanese species had strie so similar, that the striz were found to be useless as discriminating characters. The elytral sculpture is like that of a Trypeticus, and it would have been a matter of interest to me, had the information been forthcoming, to know whether the habits of the species led it to follow the Platypi or the Lomic:; whether that is, it works for its prey diametrically into the timber, or whether it seeks out the sub-cortical species only. If the former it will singularly confirm, so far as the Histeride are con- cerned, my estimation of the value of the strie on their elytra generally as guiding lines as I suggested recently in the Ann. M. N. Hist., June, 1892. Perhaps Mr. Bell will be able Jater to throw some light on this subject. Nrrontus ANDREWESI, sp. n. Parum elongatus, niger, nitidus, abdomine pedibusque rufis ; elytris punc- tatis haud striatis ; pygidio utrinque arcuatim sulcato. Long., 4¢ mm. Somewhat elongate, black, shining, legs and abdominal segments red. The head rather densely punctate, armature rather less prominent, and rather more divergent than that of WV. osorioceps, Lew. (J. c., fig. 12) ; the projections distinctly 3-carinate, with some transverse sculpture behind them ; the thorax about as broad 184, { August, as long, with two large excavations, one on each side midway between the front and base, rather less densely punctured than the head, the punctures also vary in size ; the elytra are more evenly punctured than the thorax, basal margin slightly elevated, without dorsal strie ; the propygidium somewhat closely punctured, without fovese ; the pygidium less densely punctured, with an arched sulcus on each side and abbre- viated before the apex ; the prosternum has a bent sulcus on each side abbreviated before and behind, the ends diverging from each other; the mesosternum is short, with two lateral straight grooves, and a median fovea close to the posterior edge ; the metasternum is somewhat sparsely punctured. Hab.: Kanara; found by Mr. T. R. D. Bell (No. 942). NIPONIUS PARVULUS, sp. n. Cylindricus, nigro-piceus, nitidus; pedibus rufis ; elytris tenuiter striatis ; propygidio pygidioque profunde bifoveatis. Long., 2 mm. Cylindrical, piceous, shining; the head, armature as in N. osorioceps, Lew. (J. c., fig. 12), tricarinate, with transverse sculpture behind the carine, distinctly but not closely punctured, punctures varying in size, especially some before the middle of the neck, which are rather large ; the thorax similarly punctate, with some of the larger punctures confluent, and formed into an irregular median canaliculation, which is shortened before the base; the elytra are elevated a little along the base and round the scutellar area, and are irregularly striate, somewhat like those of IV. impressicollis, Lew. (l. c., fig. 1), but the strie are rather more punctiform ; the propygidium sparsely but clearly punctate, with two median foves placed trans- versely to each other; the pygidium similarly punctured with two larger fovex resembling those of NV. osorioceps, Lew. (J. c., fig. 12), but they are rather nearer the base, and are placed more longitudinally to each other ; the prosternum, keel with marginal strie joined before and behind, the stris# approaching one another slightly between the coxe ; the mesosternum quadrate, with a conical impression on each of the anterior angles, and a median longitudinal impression not clearly defined ; the metasternum sparsely and irregularly punctured, with a well-marked median channel. This is the smallest species at present known. Hab. : Kanara (No. 753). TRYPETICUS INDICUS, sp. n. Cylindricus, niger, nitidus ; 8 fronte triangulariter carinato, 2 fronte concavo cum apice bituberculato; prosterno utringue sulcato, sulcis antice abbreviatis. Long., 3 mm. 6 cylindrical, black, shining; the head, forehead triangular, with a carina between the eyes and continued along the sides and meeting at the apex, the apex is slightly reflexed, behind the transverse portion of the carina the surface is micro- scopically strigose, with a few obscure punctures ; the thorax, behind the middle of the neck there is a carina which occupies nearly one-third of the thoracic length, surface with tear-shaped or sometimes oblong punctures, not closely set; the elytra rather more sparsely punctured, and punctures more circular; the propygidium and pygidium are similarly sculptured, the sculpture consisting of punctures smaller and more closely set than those of the elytra. a Oe 1893. | : 185 ?. Forehead triangularly concave, without any marginal carina, apex of epis- toma bituberculate, punctuation generally larger than that of the male; the prosternum similar in both sexes, keel very sparsely punctulate, lateral grooves not connected at the base, and markedly abbreviated anteriorly ; the mesosternum is also very sparsely punctured, punctures oblong, with a straight lateral groove behind the coxe; the metasternum is canaliculate in the middle, smooth along the borders of the channel, with oblong punctures outside the smooth borders. Somewhat similar to T. bombacis, Lew., but it is larger and the lateral grooves or sulci of the prosternum are abbreviated anteriorly. The thoracic carina of the ¢ enables me to confirm what was doubtful before, viz., that 7. bombacis, Lew., was described from two female examples. The female of ZT. indicus and T. bombacis has the apex of the rostrum bituberculate. Hab. : Kanara (No. 841) ; two examples. HIsTeR RuGIsTRIus, Lew. Ann. and M. N. Hist., 1892, p. 346. Amongst the Histeride from Kanara there is also a fine series of this species, but I find only one in the series agrees with the type example in having the frontal stria interrupted, in others the irregular punctures in the interstice behind the anterior angle are absent, and the specimens vary in size from 53 to St mm. There are specimens in the Museum of Calcutta taken by Mr. Cameron at Bangalore. The Firs, Inner Park Road, Wimbledon Common: June 30th, 1893. OBSERVATIONS ON COCCID (No. 5). BY R. NEWSTEAD, F.E.S., CURATOR OF THE GROSVENOR MEE CHESTER. PLATE III. All the species described in this paper were kindly forwarded to me on September 29th, 1892, by Mr. Douglas, who received them from the Botanic Garden at Demerara. I must apologize for having kept our Demerara friends so long waiting, but overpressure of other work prevented me from making any observations until now. ASPIDIOTUS DICTYOSPERMI, Morgan. Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. xxv, p. 352, pl. v, fig. 2. Many specimens of a very remarkable var., of what I take to be this species, on leaves of Areca triandra, described below as “var. A. arece.”’ 186 {August, Scale of the ? circular, exuvie central, or nearly so; the first exuvie in the form of a “nipple-like prominence” (Comstock), covered with white wax in fresh specimens, but red-brown or golden red-brown in denuded specimens ; nipple sur- rounded by a circular depression, following this is a strong circular ridge, which, in many specimens, is covered with the same white material as the nipple; these are situate on a distinct circular prominence, or boss, with nearly perpendicular sides ; below this the scale becomes very flat and wide, and is of a rich orange-brown, varying to ochreous-brown. Diam., 1—13 mm. Scale of the ¢ of the same colour, and has the same structure ab apex as the ?. Mr. Morgan, in his description of 4. dictyospermi (I. c.), states that the ? scale is “ greyish-white, with exuvie in the centre, depressed, of an elongate-oval shape.” Thus, it will be seen that the type differs very considerably in external characters from the var. described above ; the arrangement of the marginal appendages of the last segment and spinnerets of the 9 , however, agrees in every way, both with the description and figure given by Mr. Morgan; so that, in spite of the diverse character of the scale, I do not feel justified in considering it to be a new species. ASPIDIOTUS COCOTIS, 2. sp. Scale of the ? circular, white or yellowish-white, flat ; exuvice very large, central. Diam., 1—14 mm. 9 (fig. 1) with three pairs of small lobes, median pair broadest, slightly re- cessed, very slightly indented on their outer lateral margins ; second pair emarginate on outer lateral margin; third pair of nearly uniform width throughout. There are two plates between each of the first and second lobes; three between the second and third ; and beyond this there are seven or eight plates: two or three of which are serrated. All the plates, however, are most difficult to determine, and it is only in a few specimens that they can be traced at all. There are no spines or groups of spinnerets in any of the specimens examined. Both scales and insects are very badly infested with fungi; the latter to such an extent that the form of the body cannot be ascer- tained. I was hoping that the species might prove the A. destructor, of Signoret, which is said to be very injurious to palms, but there is no resemblance between them. Hab.: on Cocos nucifera, cocoa-nut palm, to which it must be very destructive, judging from the number of scales present upon the leaves. ASPIDIOTUS AFFINIS, 7”. sp. Scale of the ? high convex, slightly elongate, or more or less circular, greyishi- brown ; exuviz a little on one side, covered with a pale reddish-brown wax, which, te) when removed, exposes a sharp “nipple” of a brown colour, very like 4. rapaa, Comstock. The ¢ has three pairs of lobes (fig. 2): median pair convergent, very large, deeply notched on the outer lateral margin, and sometimes slightly so on the inner 1893. : 187 margin, ends rounded; second lobe deeply emarginate on both sides ; third lobe very small, often emarginate at base on both sides, and presenting the form of a spear-head. Between the first and second lobe, and near the base of the former, is a strong spine, and immediately following each of the second and third lobes are two spines arranged close together; about midway between the last pair and the base of the segment are one or two shorter spines. There are also scattered spinnerets, as shown in the fig. Groups of spinnerets and plates wanting, and fre- quently the spines are broken away. Described from 13 ?, and many scales. & scale smaller, but of the same colour as the 9. Unfortunately, I cannot at present furnish the name of the food-plant, as the label has been mislaid, but our Demerara correspondents will no doubt be able to do so. Dactytopius niep®, Maskell. Trans. N. Z. Instit., 1892, p. 232 (1893). @ adult, short oval, covered with yellowish-white cereous matter, arranged almost in the same way as in the genus Orthezia, but much less compact ; margin all round with a series of downward-curved, broad, laterally joined, lamelle, longest behind ; dorsum rarely presenting regular plates: when such is the case, however, they are arranged in thick squarish masses, with the body of the insect showing ‘through the divisions; generally, the dorsum is covered with one conglomerate mass, with little or no segmentation. When the insect is treated with potash, it gives off a dark reddish-crimson stain, and the shape of the body is short oval, but widest behind. Antenne of seven joints (fig. 3) ; rostrum biarticulate, short, widely rounded at apex, the latter with two long, and two or more short, delicate hairs. Legs (fig. 3a) : trochanter with a rather long hair, femur with a short hair, both near the apex ; tibie a very little longer than the tarsi, the latter with two fine hairs at apex; digitules to claws and tarsi slender, and short; the tarsal pair scarcely extending beyond the claw; anal lobes (figs. 3b and 300) very large, each with a long hair at apex, and near them on the outer margin are two short stiff spines ; anal ring with six long hairs (fig. 3c) ; dorsum with large and small spines, arranged irregularly and wide apart, and some similar on the margin. Long., 1—2 mm. (when denuded of waxy plates, a little smaller). 6 sac pure white, composed of a rather loose felting. dé unknown. The g sacs were very abundant, but the imagines had hatched from them when received. Hab.: on Nipa fruticans, an aquatic palm, and is said to be “very destructive.” J am very doubtful as to the position this species should occupy. Jn the form of the antennal joints it is clearly Dactylopid, but the very conspicuous anal lobes are abnormal]. Were it not for the curious eranular covering of the body, and the long terminal joint of the antenne, I would refer it to the genus Rhizococcus, but the characters given by Mr. Maskell (Trans. N. Z. Inst., 1891, p. 30) will not admit of my placing it in the Acanthococcide. 188 [ August, DIASPIS OPUNTIA, n. sp. Scale of the ? circular, or nearly so, pale yellowish-brown; exuvie very dark red-brown, distinct, central, or more rarely a little to one side. Diam., 2—24 mm. 2 adult almost circular ; groups of spinnerets well separated, and arranged as follows: anterior, 7—10; anterior laterals, 16—20; posterior laterals, 11-14. In addition to the above there are numerous other spinnerets or pores arranged in three interrupted, perpendicular rows, of these I counted no less than 140 in a single specimen. There are also some large elongated pores near the margin, arranged as shown in fig. 4. There are three pairs of well developed lobes, median pair largest, divergent, emarginate on inner margin; outer margin curved outwardly, ends slightly indented; 2nd and 38rd pairs bifurcated; the lobules nearly equal; the spines and plates are arranged as shown in the illustration (fig. 4). Seale of the g with a central carina only, margins almost flat ; basal portion of the same colour as the scale of the 9, apex lighter; exuvize pale yellow-brown. Scales in a compact mass, occupying one side of the plant, and but few with the females which covered the opposite side of the plant. Looked at in a mass they appear of a pale brown colour. Long., 1 mm. This species closely approaches D. cacti, Comstock (Report, 1883, p- 91, fig. 11), but there is no mention of the “numerous spinnerets or pores’ arranged in perpendicular rows, or of the elongated pores near the margin ; were it not for these, I should refer the species to the above, but I take it that these are of specific importance. De- scribed from thirteen ? and many scales. Hab. : on Opuntia elongata. On Ficus benghalensis and Anona squarrosa (sugar apple) quantities of Alewrodicus anone, Morg. The leaves of the former were completely covered with the beautiful long glassy filaments of the pupe, presenting a very pretty appearance. Ischnaspis filiformis, Doug.—Many specimens on leaves of Magnolia grandiflora. Diaspis Boisduvalii.—Abundant on a Catasetum (Orchid). Prosopophora dendrobii, Doug.—Very numerous on stems of Croton. Lecanium begonie, Doug.—A few ? on leaves and stems of Begonia. EXPLANATION OF PLATE III. Aspidiotus coccotis, ? , fig. 1, margin of last segment. 59 affinis, & , fig. 2, i a Dactylopius nipe, 2, fig. 3, antenna; 3a leg; 30, anal lobes, ventral; 300, anal lobes, dorsal view; 3c, anal ring. Diaspis opuntia, ?, fig. 4, margin of last segment, Chester: January, 1893. Mo. Mac., Vou.IV,N.S., PL.V. , Ye PN it ‘ my man CW? ene tees 1893. : 189 Pieris Daplidice at Eastbourne.—1 beg to inform you that on Sunday last, July 9th, at Eastbourne, I captured a fine specimen of Pieris Daplidice 2. Mr. Percy Hutchison and Miss Lillias Harle, both Members of this Company, were present and saw the insect alive——CuaAnrtes Masters, Theatre Royai, Aldershot : | July 13th, 1893. Gynandrous aberration in Argynnis Paphia.—A very remarkable example of this has been sent up for examination by Mr. P. Cardew, taken by himself in the New Forest. It is not evenly divided—half male and half female—but is fully three-fourths female, both wings on the right side and two-thirds of the hind-wing on the left being of that sex, with the usual olive tinge and shading on the dark fulvous colour, the larger spots, and simple nervures ; while the left fore-wing is male, with bright fulvous colour, smaller black spots, and the usual broad black suffu- sions on the middle portions of the nervures, and only the base shows a slight clouding of female colour. The left Aind-wing is more curious; the anterior portion to between the second and third nervures from that margin, is of the male colour, the remainder female, and the line of distinction is sharply drawn the whole length of the wing. There is a patch of fulvous male colour also on the left shoulder of the thorax. The structure of the apex of the abdomen is rather obscure; one harpe (clasper) is present, belonging to the left side, but the rest is rather shrunken and twisted, and hardly presents the appearance of the structure of the other sex.— Cuas. G. Barrett, Nunhead: July, 1893. Argynnis Paphia, var. Valezina, near Basingstoke.—A friend and myself have taken six Argynnis Paphia, var. Valezina, in a beech wood, near Basingstoke, this season, in the same spot where we took them two years ago; on July 8th we netted five, and my friend had taken one a day or two previously, but the most notable fact about them was that while Valezina was in fine condition, the type was very ragged and worn, not a good one to be seen, so that Valezina seems to be much later in emerging. I had the same experience two yearsago. The var. seemed as plentiful as the typical femules, for we certainly saw as many of the former as the latter.— A. H. Ham, 24, Hatherley Road, Reading: July, 1893. The second brood of Leucophasia sinapis.—This species was well out here on July 2nd, and had probably been so from the last week in June, by the worn ap- pearance of several taken; and, judging by the short time I was amongst them, appeared quite as plentiful as the first brood, and equal to it in size.—Ib. An unusual habitat for Leucophasia sinapis.—I1 have never hitherto seen this species except in or on the borders of woods; and my experience of it has been limited to the woods of Sussex, Hampshire (New Forest), Herefordshire, and North Lancashire. From the woods of this neighbourhood the “wood white” appears to be absent ; but it occurs plentifully on the beach at the base and up the slopes of the cliffs about three miles east of this place, its range extending thence some miles towards Beer Regis. ‘The commonest species of Leguminose in the locality is R 190 [August, Lathyrus sylvestris (the “wood vetch”’), and this may probably serve as the food of the larva. Hesperia Acteon also occurs in the same district; but is extremely local.—H. Goss, Sidmouth, Devon: July 17th, 1893. Lycena Arion in North Cornwall.—I am glad to be able to record the occurrence of this species in a new locality. Many of the males were worn on the 20th ulto., and the last straggler of the females which I caught to-day was passé.—ID., North Cornwall: July 1st, 1898. [Those entomologists who have read my remarks at p. 135 ante will understand that it is with great regret I find this insect is being pursued into what may probably be looked upon as its last stronghold in this country. I purposely omit the locality, which is quite new.—R. McLacuian]. Larve of Lycena Arion, L., on Origanum vulgare.—On the 1st ulto. I found five empty ova of Lycena Arion, L., in the Vallon des Fleurs, Nice, on Origanum vulgare (marjoram), and, supposing that where there had only recently been eggs there would probably be caterpillars, I searched and found ten larve, measuring =}; of an inch each. They were all found on two plants. The ova were laid on the small bracts of the flowers, which the caterpillars devour, together with the petals. As far as I am aware, this is a new food-plant for the larva of Lycena Arion, which is only stated as living on Thymus serpyllum (wild thyme), though I have long suspected it to feed on Origanum vulgare—ever since July 22nd to 26th, 1890, in fact, when I saw females of the species apparently ovipositing on flowering plants of Origanum in the Val Obscur (Nice), where this plant grows in abundance, far sur- passing the thyme in quantity. I may add that this year I took, together with the caterpillars above referred to, seventeen imagines of Lycena Arion (June 29th, 30th and July Ist). The perfect insects are now beginning to get rather worn. Milliére says that Arion is “ . . . assez rare,” but, from my experience, I should be inclined to consider it only “ local,” but common where it occurs. Tn the two seasons (1890 and 1893) in which I have collected Arion on the coast here, I have met with a beautiful variety which seems to be confined entirely to the female, being found in the proportion of about one in six examples of the type. This form measures 1,8; inches in expanse, and in colour is of a pale and brilliant electric-blue, the spots on the fore-wings are very large and jet-black and coalesce, with the exception of the two nearest the inner margin ; the hind marginal band is very broad and black. The dots on the hind-wings, however, are normal both in size and coloration.—F. Brominow, Nice, France: July 3rd, 1893. Colias Edusa.—We netted a ¢ of the above on the high ground between the Mumbles and Langland Bay, near Swansea, on July 6th. It was a good deal worn, and had probably hibernated.—A. Nasu, Standish Vicarage, Stonehouse, Glouces- tershire : July, 1893. Laverna Stephensi.—This pretty little species may be found in July on the trunks of three or four of the old oaks on Tooting Beck Common. I have never 1893.] ; : 191 found it common, and it wants a deal of finding, as it hides itself in the cracks of the bark, where I have no doubt the larve feed.—SAMUEL Srrvens, Loanda, 61, Beulah Hill, Upper Norwood : July 8th, 1893. Coccyx Ochsenheimeriana at Waltham Cross—On my return from town (May Ist) my little boy Alfred showed me a moth which he had taken during the day in the garden. It has since been identified by Mr. Barrett as Coccyx Ochsenheimeriana. So far as I know there is not a spruce fir within a quarter of a mile, but there was a plant of Picea pinsapo within a few yards. The wings were hardly dry when the insect was caught, so that it must have fed close at hand.—W. C. Boyp, The Grange, Waltham Cross: July, 1893. The food-plant of Argyrolepia Baumanniana.—In reference to My. A. H. Hamm’s note on page 166, I think it may be regarded, not only as “ probable,” but as almost certain, that Scabiosa succisa is the ordinary food-plant of the larva of 4. Baumanniana in this country, for, in addition to the fact that the insect seems only to occur with us where that plant is abundant, Sorhagen, in his “ Kleinschmetter- linge der Mark Brandenburg,” states, on the authority of A. Stange, that the larva is to be found in the rootstock of Scabiosa ochroleuca from autumn till spring. In fact, so sure have I felt for the last few years that the larva in Britain must feed in the rootstock of Scabiosa succisa, that, with so many other “ fish to fry,” I have never given up the time required for proving it, though it would be advisable to do so.—Evustace R. Banxes, The Rectory, Corfe Castle: July 10th, 1893. Early Lepidoptera.—In an exceptionally early season like the present, one is naturally prepared for surprises, but I hardly expected to meet with all of the following when collecting on a warm and sheltered piece of undercliff on our Purbeck coast on May 31st :—one Vanessa urtice, evidently fresh from the pupa ; Melanargia Galatea, a few males in splendid condition ; three or four Hpinephele Janira; Hes- peria Acton, plentiful (from their numbers and the already worn condition of some of them, it seemed probable that the imagines must have begun to emerge about ten days previously !); one Acidalia marginepunctata; two or three Eubolia bi- punctaria ; one Odontia dentalis; Ebulea crocealis, not uncommon; Scoparia dubitalis; Platytes cerussellus ; one Homeosoma nimbella ; one Penthina gentiana ; one Aspis Udmanniana; Ephippiphora cirsiana, not uncommon ; two Dickro- rhampha acuminatana ; four D. senectana, taken amongst Chrysanthemum leucanthe- mum, in the roots of which the larve evidently feed in that locality ; one Hupecilia atricapitana; Ptocheuusa inopella, not uncommon ; one Pt. subocellea ; Anacampsis anthyllidella ; one Coleophora discordella; two C. conyze; one C. troglodytella ; Elachista pollinariella ; three Oxyptilus teucrii; one Aciptilia baliodactyla ; and one A. pentadactyla. No doubt many more might have been added, but as my whole time and attention were devoted to working for D. senectana, I only netted such other insects as crossed my path.—Ip.: July 11¢h, 1893. Hemiptera near Oxford.—I have to record the following Hemiptera from Bagley Wood, in the immediate neighbourhood of Oxford, during the present year. Centro- tus cornutus, Linn., common, by beating young oaks in the evening ; I have taken this Ry 2 192 d ‘August, species very rarely in the daylight, but I took about twenty specimens by beating on April 29th. Triecphora vulnerata, Iliger, not uncommon, by sweeping alders ; several specimens of this conspicuous insect have been taken by myself and others during April. Acanthosoma hemorrhoidalis, Linn., one specimen by beating haw- thorn on April 28th. Pentatoma baccarum, Linn., several specimens by sweeping and beating low bushes and hawthorn with the preceding. P. dissimile, one speci- men on hawthorn, April 28th. Podops inunctus, Fabr., one specimen by sweeping dead nettles on April 29th. Sekirus bicolor, rather common, on dead nettles in company with the preceding. I have also to record Ranatra linearis, Linn., from Port Meadow early in the present year.—Joun W. Suripp, Oxford University Museum: May 1st, 1893. Hermeophaga mercurialis at Oxford.—Canon Fowler (Col. Brit. Isl., iv, p. 361), in describing this species, says, that it has apparently not occurred in the Midlands. But during the past spring (March 20th, 1893), whilst collecting in Bagley Wood, I came upon a small patch of Mercurialis perennis, upon which a number of H. mercurialis were feeding in small numbers. At the slightest rustle of the leaves they rolled off, feigning death. They did not appear to confine themselves to the upper portion of the leaves, for I noticed several feeding on the under-sides ; I also noticed a number feeding (or rather sitting) on the young leaves of a stunted sallow near the patch, in company with a few specimens of Crepidodera chloris, Foudr. This latter sect is, I believe, more common and widely distributed than is thought, and is often passed over for C. aurata, Marsh., which is generally common, and which somewhat resembles it in general appearance. C. helxines, Linn., is common in Bagley Wood on the young sallows in the spring.—I».: June 7th, 1893. Onthophagus taurus, Linn., introduced from the Channel Islands.—A few weeks ago a local fruiterer and potato merchant forwarded me one or two specimens of an Onthophagus, which I instantly recognised as taurus. I immediately began to hunt for more, and was rewarded by finding two (both males) in the peat in which the young potatoes were packed from the Channel Islands. This instance clearly shows how one of our rare British beetles may, all circumstances favourable, find a home in any secluded portion in the British Islands. I may here mention that of the other species of the genus, O. nuchicornis was very common imbedded in the earth under a dead rabbit near Bagley Wood, whilst only one specimen of O. vacca was taken in company with it. O. ovatus is very common in Bagley Wood.—Ip.: July 1st, 1893. Coleoptera near Cardiff.—The present season has so far been remarkably prolific in the Cardiff district, and the following species have occurred within the past two months in a radius of about: three miles:—Hlaphrus uliginosus (one specimen), Mal- thodes marginatus, M. minimus, M. dispar, all common; MW. atomus and M. guttifer scarce ; while MM. misellus was common on the banks of the Taff for a few days, and then suddenly vanished. A seventh species of the genus (¥M. flavoguttatus) also occurred a year or two ago. Of Aphodius I have taken fourteen species this season, including sticticus (very scarce), *ristis (common), rufescens and fatens (rather common). Anthonomus ulmi has been very common, and I may also mention the simultaneous occurrence, on a small bed of Scrophularia, of Cionus scrophularie, verbaset, blattarie, and pulchellus —B. Tomuin, Llandaff: July, 1893. 1893.1 : 193 Coleoptera in the Hastings District, 1892.—The following are some of the best species taken by me during the last season. At Guestling, from grass tufts, early in spring, Anchomenus livens, Lebia chlorocephala (2), Badister sodalis, Megacronus cingulatus (3), Plinthus caliginosus (sparingly), Phytobius 4-tuberculatus, Apion sorbt (1), Scydmenus hirticollis, Cenopsis Waltoni, Acalles ptinoides, Leptinus testaceus (1), and Conipora orbiculata. Evening sweeping produced Huthia Schaumi (1), Aniso- toma grandis (2), Bagous subcarinatus, Gyll., Rhinoncus denticollis (2), Hncephalus complicans, Homalium exiguum (1), Gymnetron meianarius, Celiodes geranii, and Dorcatoma flavicornis. Three specimens of Scydmenus rubicundus occurred in rotten wood.—W. H. Bennett, 11, George Street, Hastings : Ju/y, 1893. Eubria palustris at Fairlight.—I am pleased to be able to record this little rarity from this district. I was casually sweeping a marshy spot where I sometimes get Phytobius 4-tuberculatus, when I found a specimen of Hubria in my net; and continuing to sweep, I shortly took a second specimen. I then set to work looking for the beetle in its haunts, and was fortunate enough to find them in a very wet place among the grass and moss. I found the best way to get them was to clear away the long grass, and then very patiently watch the wet moss and small plants. The Hubrie then crawl up the short stems and on the moss, sunning themselves. They are not at all easy to see, as after getting into the required position, they draw back their antennz and remain perfectly motionless. Even when seen they are not easy to get, as they fall to the ground at the slightest touch, and are not easily seen again. However, I managed to get about thirty specimens, and a friend who was with me took fifteen. A second visit to the spot three days later produced only three specimens between two searchers in an hour and a half.—Ip. Anthrenus varius, §c.—During the last week I have taken about a dozen of these pretty little beetles on the sweet-scented flowers of Hrigeron philadelphicum in the garden, but only during bright sunshine, and then but two or three at a time; when the weather is dull they are not visible. They affect the discs of the flowers, and busy themselves with poking their noses down among the florets, moving briskly - about in the intervals of feeding. These flowers are also attractive to many other insects—Hymenoptera and Diptera, but they rarely settle ; they content themselves with hovering around, as if perfumed air was sufficient for them. One day also a male Trochilium tipuliforme appeared.—J W. Dovenas, Lewisham: June 4th, 1893. Chrysomela gettingensis at Box Hill.—I captured a pair of this species at the end of June under a stone near the foot of Box Hill.—T. Hupson Barz, Richmond, Surrey: July 13th, 1893. Chrysomela gettingensis.—I see the Rey. Canon Fowler records this beetle from Sherwood Forest. I took a specimen near Cresswell at Easter, and Mrs. Brierley, of this town, brought me two specimens picked up casually near Boston Spa, Yorks. I have also taken Dryocetes alni freely here on alder.—S. L. Mostny, Beaumont Park Museum, Huddersfield: July, 1893. 194 fAugust, Dryophanta disticha.—This gall, which Cameron gives as “ rare,” is abundant in a wood near here just now. I could send specimens to any one requiring it. Can any one send me the cotton gall (4. ramuli) P—Ip. Spilochalcis marie, Riley.—Some months ago Mr. Morris, of Kew, sent to Jamaica a number of cocoons of Attacus Cynthia which he had obtained from M. Wailly. They were placed in my care at the Museum, and many of them produced a parasitic Chalcid, these insects emerging some time before any of the moths. I sent some of the Chalcids to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Mr. L. O. Howard writes me that Mr. Ashmead has identified them as Spilochalcis marie. This is a well-known parasite of A. Cynthia and allied moths in America, and, as Mr. Howard remarks, it must have been introduced into England.—T. D. A. CocKERELL, Las Cruces, New Mexico: June, 1893. [We are informed by Mons. Wailly that the cocoons of A. Cynthia referred to were imported by him from America. The occurrence is interesting, as proving the vitality of both moth and parasite under the cireumstances.—EDs. ]. Pith of New Zealand Flax.—In the Ent. Mo. Mag. for February and March I notice your remarks and those of Mr. Coryndon Matthews on the use of artichoke pith and felt for mounting small insects. I herewith forward a sample of another material which I find to answer admirably for the same purpose; it is the pith of the dried flower stems of the New Zealand flax (Phormium tenax). Although, perhaps, not quite equal to artichoke pith, it is, nevertheless, an excellent article for fine work and for lining store boxes. It is obtainable in unlimited quantities in pieces varying from one inch to two inches square, and can be easily cut to the required thickness. It is extremely light and clean, and the larger square pieces when grooved in the centre make setting boards second to none for Micro-Lepidoptera. What do you think of it p—W. W. Smiru, Ashburton, New Zealand: May 15th, 1893. [Mr. Smith kindly forwarded samples of this pith. It is of extreme lightness and tolerably fine in texture, though not equalling artichoke pith in this latter respect. It does not turn the points of Nos. 19 and 20 English pins, save towards the outside margins of the pieces (this could be obviated by trimming). For lining store boxes, &c., I consider it decidedly preferable to Agave pith. Its texture is scarcely fine enough for mounting specimens on for the cabinet, and for this purpose its colour (a kind of pale purplish-brown) is also objectionable ; but it is just possible the colouring matter might be discharged by some process.—R. McLacuian]. Obituary. Francis Polkinghorne Pascoe, F.L.S., §e., was born at Penzance on Sept. 1st, 18138, and died at Brighton June 20th, 1893. He was educated at the Grammar School of his native town, and subsequently entered at St. Bartholomew’s Hospital as a student. He was admitted M.R.C.S. in 1835, and soon afterwards obtained an appointment in the Navy as Surgeon, serving on the Australian, West Indian and Mediterranean Stations. In 1843 he married Miss Glasson, of Falmouth, and 1893. | : 195 retired from the service, settling near St. Austell, in the vicinity of which he had a property producing Kaolin (China clay). He was left a widower in 1851, and then settled permanently in London, and devoted his attention entirely to Entomo- logy and Natural History generally. But until lately he travelled much, either alone or in the company of one or more of his daughters, and in this way he traversed nearly over the whole of Europe, North Africa, &c., and once made a voyage to the Lower Amazons to make personal acquaintance with the natural marvels of that rich region. But he had not the aptitude for collecting, and thus the resulis of his travels were small in materials as compared with what they might have been. As a writer he commenced witha botanical paper in Henfrey’s Botanical Gazette in 1850, enumerating unrecorded Cornish plants. But he mainly devoted himself to Coleoptera, commencing with the Longicorns, on which he published much, including “ Longicornia Malayana,” enumerating and describing the species collected by Wallace, which formed Vol. iii of the third series of the Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., 1864—1869, containing 712 pp. with 24 coloured plates. Subsequently the Colydiide and cognate groups, and still later the Curculionide, engaged his attention, and the number of his published papers on Coleoptera is very great. His collections of Coleoptera he sold to the British Museum not long before his death, when ill health warned him that he could make no further use of them: we believe they contained above 2500 type specimens of species described by him. For many years he had also accumulated an enormous mass of materials illustrative of a “Systema Nature,’ mainly arranged in pasteboard boxes, and mostly mounted on card quite irrespective of size, a practice that caused him to be the object of a certain amount of good natured “ chaff.” His active mind was never at rest, and latterly he produced quite a small library of 12mo works on the animal kingdom, mostly compilations, the raison d’étre of some of which was difficult to imagine, but some were decidedly useful, and especially the second edition of his “ Zoological Classification ”’ (1880), in which an enormous amount of information is compressed into a small compass. He was an ardent admirer of Darwin and a staunch evo- lutionist, but a strong disbeliever in Natural Selection in the sense in which the term is applied by many post-Darwinians, and in 1899 he gave vent to his strong feelings on this point in an exposition of the Darwinian theory, which was the last of his separate publications: we think it did not attract the amount of attention the author assumed it would. He was also the editor of the short-lived “Journal of Entomology, descriptive and geographical.” He joined the Entomological Society of London in 1854, and was President in 1864—65, and there was scarcely any more regular attendant at the Meetings; was a Member of the Entomological Society of France since 1862; and belonged also to the Belgian, Stettin, and other foreign Societies. He became a Fellow of the Linnean Society in 1852, and was for many years on the Council of the Ray Society and the Scientific Committee of the Royal Horticultural Society; it may be said of him that he was never happy save in the company of Naturalists. In private life Pascoe showed himself, as in his writings, a man of strong bias and opinions, but he never allowed these feelings to influence his friendships. In society he was amiable to a point, and the social gatherings at his house were always enjoyable. Less than two years ago he was overtaken by bad health, and was advised to reside in the country, which he did, firstly at Tunbridge Wells and latterly at 196 [August, 1893. Brighton, where he died somewhat suddenly. He leaves three daughters (to one of whom we are indebted for particulars of her father’s early life). An only son, a young lieutenant in the Navy, died in 1872, to his father’s great grief. In addition to his collections, Mr. Pascoe amassed a very extensive Library on all ‘branches of Natural History.—R. McL. . _ Rev. Henry Burney, M.A.—We have to announce the death of Mr. Burney, which occurred on July 16th, in his 80th year. He graduated at Oxford, and was ordained so long ago as 1839. For the last 47 years he had been Rector of Waven- don, in Buckinghamshire. He was a well known student of British Lepidoptera, and amassed.a large collection. He was a constant contributor to the “ Intelligencer,” and his name appears frequently in the pages of this Magazine. Soviety. THe Souta Lonpon EnromotoeicaL AND Narurat History Society: July 13th, 1893.—Cuas. G. Barrett, Esq., F.E.S., Vice-President, in the Chair. Mr. C. Oldham exhibited specimens of Macaria liturata, Clerck, Melanthia albicillata, li.,and many others, some fine forms of Odonestis potatoria, L., and a specimen of Plusia moneta, captured at Woodford on June 2nd; Mr. Adkin re- marking that this species appeared to be distributing itself gradually over the country. Mr. South showed a remarkable form of Triphena pronuba, L., it being the typical pronuba on one side, and the variety innuba, Tr., on the other, also a series of Coccyx Ochsenheimeriana, Zell.,and a variable series of C. tedella from Middlesex. Mr. Fenn exhibited long bred series of Dicranura bifida, Hb., Boarmia roboraria, Schiff., and Notodonta dictea, L., from Bexley, the New Forest, and Deal respectively. Messrs. Adkin, South, Frohawk, and Briggs showed very long series of Pieris brassice, L., from many parts of England, Scotland, and the Isle of Man, &c., for the purpose of showing the variation existing, both in size and markings. Mr. Adkin drawing attention to the manner in which the depth of colour in the tips varied from black to dove-grey. One shown by Mr. South was no larger than an average Pieris rape, L. Mr. Frohawk’s comprised, amongst others, a number from Harwich, these cor- responded to the southern French type, and had, no doubt, immigrated. Mr. H. Moore showed three specimens of the harlequin beetle, Acrocinus longimanus, from Trinidad, &e. Mr. Auld, a fine var. of Lomaspilis marginata, l., from Folkestone. Mr. Step, a number of pupex of the bacon beetle, Dermestes lardarius, which he stated were being experimentally tried as bait for fishing when in the larval con- dition. Mr. Barrett mentioned a curious instance in which a number of Lepidopterous Jarve had been found in earthen cells in a book drawer, and were supposed to have been placed there by one of the fossorial Hymenoptera. Mr. West, of Streatham, showed Sesia bembeciformis, D. L. Mr. Turner, two varieties of Argynnis Selene, Schiff., and a number of Yortrices and Tinee, including Penthina pruniana, Hb, Sciaphila subjectana, Gn., S. hybridana, Hb., Tortrix ministrana, L., Phoxopteryx : Mitterbacheriana, Schiff., Nemophora Swammerdamella, L., &e. Mr. Briggs also ; exhibited a portion of the outer covering of a tree wasps’ nest, which was curiously striped with blue, the insects having no doubt been using blue paper or other material of that colour in its formation.—H. Wixuiams, Hon. Secretary. September, 1893. | : 197 NOTES ON THE EARLIER STAGES OF THE NEPTICULZ, WITH A VIEW TO THEIR BETTER RECOGNITION AT THIS PERIOD OF THEIR LIFR. ; BY JOHN H. WOOD, M.B. Nowhere, perhaps, in the whole range of the Mtcro-Lepidoptera does the field naturalist find a more fascinating group than the Nept:- cule. They are so rich in species as to form almost a study by themselves, whilst, in their pursuit, the chances of making fresh discoveries are so great, that an especial excitement is given to the chase. They may be collected in one state or the other the whole season through, but it is in the larval condition, and when autumn is drawing to a close and little else to be done, that they are in greatest force and best obtainable. ‘Then it is, that armed with the simplest of impedimenta, a lense, and a few small tin cases to receive the mines as they are sorted, the collector can spend many a pleasant hour among the woods and hedgerows, and find his occupation so profitable, that he will scarcely miss the wealth of insect life that has long since taken its departure with the fruitful days of summer. Nothing too ean be more interesting than the objects of his search. There, in the small compass of a leaf, lies open before him the whole life-history of the insect, from the egg to the full-fed larva. If there is any drawback to his enjoyment, it is the uncertainty he may feel in sorting his spoils. To be in doubt, for instance, whether or no there may be a few mines of regiella among the heap of hawthorn leaves, which his very un- certainty has led him to gather so wastefully, is at least unsatisfactory, and not to be compared for a moment to the pleasure of knowing (if that be possible) that the dozen or more leaves, carefully put away in a box by themselves, are every one of them tenanted by that rare species, and by nothing else. And that it ought to be possible to distinguish in the larval state, without hesitation, all our British species, I thoroughly believe, for the reason that we have in these insects an unusual number of distinct lines of enquiry by which to reach a decision. First, there is the food-plant; then the position of the egg; next the form of the mine; and, equally important, the arrangement of the frass; and, last of all, the characters of the larva. Surely, with such an array of signposts, it will be hard to miss the way, unless it be in the case of some specimen or other which is not true to character in all its points; but even here a pretty good guess can generally be made, and we shall be saved the disappointment of S 198 : (September, discovering, when the moth appears, that what we had hoped might be the vanguard of a new species just about to invade our district, was only an old friend in a new guise. I propose in these notes to examine, in the first place, each of these several heads, food-plant, egg, &c., separately, and afterwards to apply the results for distinguishing between certain allied species which are usually considered hard to separate in the larval condition. If, among much that is of necessity common knowledge, there should be anything new or helpful in what I am about to write, it must be’ chiefly ascribed to my good fortune in living in what I believe to be quite a paradise for these charming little insects. My hunting ground is a bit of rough, hilly country on the limestone, barely three miles across in any direction; and in this small space rather more than fifty species have already been taken. My field of observation, therefore, has been both rich and compact, as well as close at hand. Moreover, for years I have been devoted to the subject, and even now, on the return of autumn, the old interest revives as keen as ever, and sends me off to some favourite corner of my ground, there to while away my leisure moments. Purely local, then, as my experience has been, it has, nevertheless, been gathering long, and from a field sufficiently ample ; and I mention this, lest it might be thought that I have attached too great importance to some of the characters I shall draw attention to, which a wider outlook would not warrant. FOOD-PLANT. Little can be said here that is not already well known. Particular natural Orders, as might be expected, are especial favourites with our insects. The Rosacee and Amentacee supply between them the food- plant of something like five-sixths of the British species; and not only so, but the favouritism extends to particular members of these Orders. Thus the birch supports at least ten species, the oak five, the hawthorn and apple also five each, then four feed on the roses, three at least on the willows, the same number on pear, and so on down the list, until at last we reach an insignificant minority of two or three plants which are tenanted only by single species. Out of the nine other productive Orders, the Urticacee give us the elms which support three species, the Ericacee supply two plants, each tenanted by a single species, whilst the remaining seven (although amonest them are groups of great extent like the Leguminose and Labiate) contain but one kind of plant each, acceptable to the Mepéicu/e, and each kind is 1893. ] “ 199 tenanted only by a single species. In other words, the plants of the two favoured Orders are for the most part many-tenanted, and carry amongst them nearly sixty of our species, whilst those of the nine ill-favoured ones are, with the exception of the elms, single-tenanted, and amongst them all carry but twelve, a very curious and striking contrast. I need, therefore, scarcely observe that it is to the favoured Orders, the Rosacee and Amentacee, that the eager collector naturally turns in the expectation of making new discoveries, and it is also among them that so many of his difficulties arise in the endeavour to discriminate between the mines of the different species—difliculties that would be increased tenfold, were it not for the circumstance that each Nepticula, instead of having a plurality of foods as each plant has commonly a plurality of insects, is almost invariably limited to a single food-plant. The following include all the exceptions I am ac- quainted with. Both the nut species, as is well known, are often found on the hornbeam (Carpinus betulus) ; eneofasciella is partial to Potentilla tormentilla, in addition to its more usual food, the agrimony (Agrimonia eupatoria) ; oxyacanthella occurs commonly on apple and pear, as well as hawthorn; atricolella on apple and hawthorn, but never also on pear, so far as I know; angulifasciella I have met with in the leaves of Poterium sanguisorba quite often enough for its pre- sence not to be accidental; but of all troublesome species in this respect nothing can rival the bramble feeder, awrella: I have little belief in such species as splendidissimella, the Nepticula of the rasp- berry and dewberry, and ge that of the Geum, and in spite of the food-plants would refer both to aurella; it is also found frequently on strawberry and agrimony, and on one occasion I bred it from a small colony on meadow sweet (Sp7rea ulmaria), whilst other observers could probably add still further to its dietary. These, perhaps, pretty well exhaust the exceptions among the British species, if we exclude some which feed on the roses, willows and poplars respectively, where the distinctions of the botanist do not appear to be altogether recog- nised by the insects. THE EGG. By tracing back the mine to its starting point, the egg, or rather its empty shell, can be readily found. It is of good size for such small insects, roundish-oval in outline, moderately domed above and flattened beneath, and of a black or occasionally a brown colour. The colour is due to the presence of frass, for the larva, on hatching, eats its way out through the flat under-side straight into the substance of S2 200 | September, the leaf, packing the shell behind it with its dejecta. But the point that concerns us at the present moment is, that in the great majority of cases the moth is by no means indifferent as to where on the leaf she places it. I have noted the matter in 41 different species, in all of which the observations have been many times repeated and on many separate occasions, and in only four of them have I found the position of the egg to be inconstant. Even these four ought perhaps to be reduced to three, if we exclude salicis, which is scareely a true exception. On the rough leaved willows (Salix cinerea and caprea) it Jays on the under-surface of the leaves, but in the smooth leaved species (S. alba) on the upper-surface: the reason apparently being, that in the former plants, although the leaves are clothed below with a thick wooliy covering, the hairs stand on end, and the moth is able to push her ovipositor between and reach firm ground ; whereas in the latter the covering is not only extremely dense, but is also brushed close down upon the surface, and so the upper-side is selected instead, where the hairs are not as thick. In the other 37 some degree or other of choice is shown by the parent insect. It may be merely the selection of one side of the leaf in preference to the other, or the choice way be still more precise and extend to a particular part of it, as the extreme edge, the shelter of a protecting rib on the under side, or the corresponding suleus on the upper-side. In some cases there is good and sufficient reason for the selection. The larva of apicella passes the early part of its life in the stalk of the aspen leaf; the egg must, therefore, be laid upon the stalk, and there it is that we find the empty shell, at the foot of the small swelling produced by the larva. In like manner the egg of zntimella must be sought for on the stalk of the Bedford willow (S. Russelliana), or on the upper-surface of the midrib of the great sallow (S. caprea), for this larva also burrows into the stalk or midrib of its food-plant, and only in the latter part of its life extends its mine into the blade. Again, regiella and igno- bilella blotch the lobes of the hawthorn leaves. The mines of both begin as galleries which run along the margin, ensuring by this means the subsequent advance of the blotch inwards, that is, from the margin to the centre, for if it advanced in the opposite direction, then one or other of two misfortunes would be liable to happen; either the larva might reach the end of the lobe prematurely and find its supply of food exhausted, or the flow of sap might be so cut off, that the end of the lobe would wither and die, and the larva run the risk, as before, of perishing of starvation. Hence their instinct leads them to start the body of their mines from the edge. The eggs of both are laid on the 1893. ] : 201 under-side of the lobes, but whilst that of regiella is placed immedi- ately under the edge, that of ignobilella is well away from it, and, as _ often as not, quite in the middle. Now there is good reason for the extra precision on the part of regiella. Its gallery is short and coarse, and if it did not start true from the first, all its gyrations might fail to carry it to its proper situation, whilst the gallery of ¢gnobilella, being fairly long and slender, is sure sooner or later in its course to reach the edge and give the larva the necessary knowledge of its whereabouts. Very commonly, however, no explanation for the position of the egg is possible, beyond the simple statement that it is the nature of the insect to place it where she does. For example, one species will lay on the upper-side, and another, for no apparent cause, on the under-side of the same kind of leaf, and yet each will cling exclusively to its own habit, as if it were a matter of vital importance. Now and then, of course, an egg will be found out of place, but it is really surprising how seldom such a mistake occurs, and there are many species in which I have not yet seen it happen. Consequently, as a character, the position of the egg is quite as reliable as many another on which the naturalist has learnt todepend. Let me give an instance or two, where this may be the only, or at any rate the most important quality at our disposal. The first part of the mine of eneofasciella is a very long and slender gallery, just like, in fact, the mine of awrella ; the larve too are very similar. At this early stage, therefore, a mine of aurella in a leaf of agrimony (and such an occurrence, as has already been stated, is by no means uncommon) could not well be distinguished from that of the more legitimate occupant, if it were not for the fact that the egg of eneofascielia is always on the under-side of the leaf, and that of awrella as invariably on the upper-side. It may be as well to say that the kind of leaf seems to make no difference to awredla, and whether it be bramble, strawberry or any other, the moth always lays upon the upper-side. Pygmeella and gratiosella are both fond, but especially the latter, of laying on the narrow leafy frill that edges the stalk of the hawthorn leaf. Both mines on reaching the blade keep along the edge, and are occasionally so alike in every way that, if empty, nothing but the position of the egg cou!d enable one to say which was which. If, however, the egg should be on the upper-surface of the frill, the mine can be confidently referred to pygmeella, and as confidently to gratiosella if on the under-surface. (To be continued). 902 (September, CONCHYLIS DEGREYANA, McL.: AN ENIGMA. BY THE RIGHT HON. LORD WALSINGHAM, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., &c. Has this species an alias like Mr. Hyde, or a double like the hero of the Lyons mail ? Specimens apparently undistinguishable from each other have certainly been bred from larve feeding in two widely distinct plants. Mr. Warren, who has bred it from seeds, and possibly flowers, of Linaria vulgaris, describes the larva as pale yellow, and as burrowing into the ground to pupate, although he mentions a single specimen which must have become a “ pupa in a flower-head.” He made these observations fellowing the line indicated by Mr. Barrett, who recorded (Ent. Mo. Mag., XI, 195) that Mr. Bree had bred the species a good many years ago from the seeds of this plant; but Mr. Barrett himself has always met with it among Plantago lanceolata, and had expressed his conviction in 1870 that this would prove to be its food-plant, although he failed to find the larva. From my observations of the habits of the species I had always shared this conviction, and was much surprised at Warren’s confirmation of Bree’s original discovery, for wherever I have found it most abundant Plantago has been the prevailing plant, and Linaria in many cases has been wholly absent. Finding a small larva feeding in the seed-head of Plantago lanceo- lata on the 9th July, 1889, I gathered several heads, and from these a single specimen was bred on the 20th (the empty pupa case protruding from the extremity of the seed-head), on the same day I made another expedition to the place, and collecting more of the seed-heads, bred one specimen on the 4th August and two on the 5th. Another batch of larve was accidentally destroyed before I was able to carry out my intention of describing it, and the species having disappeared from that locality, all further search has been fruitless. It is thus certain that there are two larve with different habits, the one on Linaria habitually descending to the ground to pupate, the other on Plantago pupating in the seed-heads. In this neighbourhood the perfect insect can be relied upon to appear within three years after any piece of heath or cultivated land on the light sandy soil has been broken up and enclosed, whether planted with trees or left uncultivated. It continues to frequent such places for three years or more, but disappears when the vegetation becomes thicker, even before the Plantago has been completely smothered out. It flies only yust before sunset, and there are cer- tainly two distinct broods, roughly speaking, one the first week in June, the other the first week in August. 1893.) 5 903 I have met with specimens which I could not separate as belonging to any distinct species among patches of Zinaria, as well as at a distance from any Linaria, but whenever I have found it among Linaria, Plantago has always been present in some abundance. I should add that in every year I am able to meet with one or two straggling specimens, although it never occurs in abundance except in such freshly enclosed places as I have mentioned—the only exception to this rule was one occasion on which I took about twenty specimens of the first brood on the allotments at Brandon, where Linarva cer- tainly predominates. The following list of references may be useful, as the species, although described in 1869, was omitted from Staudinger and Wocke’s Catalogue : — 881 (bis)—pEGrRevana, Mech. Eupecilia degreyana Mech. Ent. Ann. 1869. 91—92 1; Brt. Hut. Mo. Mag. V. 245. (1869) 2: VII. 158—9. (1870) 3: Tr. Nfk. & Norw. Nat. Soc. I. Sppl. 61. (1874) 4: Ent. Mo. Mag. XI. 195. (1875) 5: in Mason’s Hist. Norfolk. App. xxxvi (1884) 6: Tr. Nfk. & Norw. Nat. Soc. III. 698. (1884) 7; Wrn. Ent. Mo. Mag. XXIV. 134. (1887) 8; Brt. Tr. Nfk. & Norw. Nat. Soc. IV. 700. (1889) 9. Larva—in sem. Linaria vulgaris 5 8, Plantago lanceolata (W\sm), VII (Wlsm), VIII 8, 1X 8. Imago—V 3, VL 3, ViI 3, VIII 3, 1X 8. Hab.—Enetanp—Wicken Fen 1, Thetford 1, Norwich 3, Merton 4, Brandon 4, Croxton 7, Denton 9. ; Merton Hall: August, 1893. A CONJECTURE AS TO THE ORIGIN OF THE NAME HUP@CILIA ANTHEMIDANA, CuRTtIs. BY JOHN HARTLEY DURRANT, F.E.S., Memp. Soc. Ent. DE FRANCE. Curtis, Pr. Ent. Soc. Lond. (N.S8.), III, 48—4 (1855), states that he collected the flower-heads of Anthemis cotula at Ryde, Isle of Wight, on the 10th of August (presumably 1855), and from these he bred several insects belonging to different Orders. One of his notes runs as follows :—“ On the 22nd of September from the same heads I found hatched in the box Cochylis subroseana, Haw. 1.” Wilkinson, Br. Tortr., 309—10 (1859), under the heading “ Eupecilia anthemidana, Curtis,’ writes—“ An uncommon species ; first noticed by Mr. John Curtis, who bred it from larve feeding in the flower-heads of Anthemis cotula. It is smaller than Hup. nana, but in colours and markings more resembles Kup. subroseana.” 204, : = [September, I think the deduction to be made from these two extracts is that — (1). Curtis bred a species of Conchylis from the flower-heads of Anthemis cotula, which at the time he recorded as Cochylis subroseana, Haw. (2). That afterwards he regarded it as distinct from that species, and applied to it the MS. name of anthemidana. (8). That Wilkinson described, under the name of anthemidana, Curtis, the species which Curtis, in the first instance, called subroseana, Hw., for he distinctly states that it was first noticed by Curtis, who bred it from the flower-heads of Anthemis cotula, and that in colour and markings it resembles Kup. subroseana. I have been unable to find a reference by Curtis to any species under the name anthemidana, nor is this name to be found in his cabinet, which is at Melbourne. Merton Hall: August, 1893. ON A NEW GENUS ALLIED TO HERCYNA. BY G. T. BETHUNE-BAKER, F.L.S. A few years ago, when going through the genus Hercyna, my friend Dr. Staudinger sent me a couple of species of a new genus allied thereto, taken at about 8,000 to 10,000 ft. altitude in the mountains of Shah Kuh, N. Persia; want of leisure and other causes have delayed my describing these before. The species are closely allied to Hercyna, but are scarcely more than half their size, and lack the shiny appearance so conspicuous in the former. HERCYNELLA, nov. gen. Head rough, face rounded, ocelli distinct, tongue developed. Labial paipi moderately long, carried obliquely, end joint almost horizontal, thickly clothed with hairs. Maxillary palpi very small indeed, ending in a very fine brush of hairs from end of apex. Antenne, two-thirds, simple in both sexes. Abdomen moderately stout. Fore-wings widening but little towards the posterior margin. Hind-wings small. Fringes long. HERCYNELLA SLAUDINGERI, 2. sp. Fore-wings pale brownish-ochreous, with two dark, umber-brown, oblique, interrupted stripes, the first line from near the base on the costa extends to a point about one-third along the inner margin, the posterior stripe, much interrupted, makes a small angle from the costa towards the posterior margin, and then recedes some- what towards the base. The discoidal cell terminates in a dark umber long spot; a 1893. ] : 905 dark umber spot also occupies the centre of the same cell. Fringes long, same hue as wings; posterior margin darkly dotted, in the ¢ there is a line of dark shading just in front of this margin, that is absent in the @. Posterior-wings dark greyish- brown, with long, somewhat paler, fringes. Length, 13 min. Yhree specimens from the Shah Kuh mountains, 8,000 to 10,000 feet high. : HERCYNELLA MARGELANA, 7%. Sp. Foro-wings dirty ash-grey. with a black curved stripe between the base of the wing and the centre, but rather nearer the latter ; a black spot near the costa beyond the centre, followed by an oblique, curved, black stripe from the costa to the inner margin, just beyond a small black dash near the anal angle. Hind margin darkly dotted ; the extreme base of the wings is also blackish. The whole of the wing is covered with rough, dark grey scales, which, in fresh specimens, are much lighter in colour just in front of the posterior stripe, appearing as a paler band across the wing. Fringes grey. Hind-wings brownish-grey, with a line of dark shading near the posterior margin, which (margin) is finely bordered with black. Fringes pale grey, with a dark dividing line. Length, 123 to 13; mm. From Shah Kuh mountains, 8,060 to 10,000 feet high. This genus is very closely allied to Hercyna, but the pattern of colouring is quite different ; the insects are (both species) only about half the size of the species of that genus, they have none of the lustrous appearance of the former, being rather of a dull rough sur- face than otherwise, and the maxillary palpi are quite minute. The palpi are also very stiffly and closely haired up to the end of the second joint, and the antenne are not ciliated. Edgbaston, Birmingham ; July, 1893. OBSERVATIONS ON COCCID# (No. 6). BY R. NEWSTEAD, F.E.S., CURATOR OF THE GROSVENOR MUSEUM, CHESTER. LECANOPSIS, Targioni-Tozzetti. This genus was established by Targioni-Tozzetti to receive his L. rhizophila. Subsequently Signoret (Essai, p. 285) included in it Porphyrophora radicum-graminis, Birensprung, and Coccus radicum- graminis, Fonscolombe ; both, however, doubtfully. The chief generic characters given are—“ Margin wide, with a deep anal cleft ; anal lobes obtuse, approximate ; antenna short, conical, of six joints; mentum (‘Os’) narrow; legs short, stout ; tibie trun- cate and anteriorly grooved ; tarsi ovate, acute.” Although the species described below has eight joints to the 206 {September, antenne, I have not the least hesitation in placing it in this genus. The characters of the genus must, therefore, be extended to include species having eight joints to the antennz ; a very common variation of character in the 2? Lecaniide. LECANOPSIS FORMICARUM, 2. sp. ? adult, naked, dusky yellow or reddish-yellow, with two broad interrupted Me subdorsal stripes, meeting at the anal dorsal lobes, disappearing on the thoracic segment, but appearing again near the margin in front as two distinct spots, which might easily be mistaken for eyes. Form elongate, narrowed in front from the middle ; eyes very small, nearly black, situate on the margins, anterior — of the two spots; antenne (fig. 1) of eight tapering joints— Ist very wide, with a blunt spine at apex beneath; 2nd as long as the lst; the rest in length about equal, all with a few hairs ; 8th with several at apex; rostrum uniarticulate, short, obtuse, furnished at apex with three hairs, and on either side at base with one; unexpanded filaments very little longer than rostrum ; Sg ( legs (fig. 2) long and stout, about three times the length of the antenne ; femur suddenly pointed at apex, and apparently grooved, attached to the groove is a delicate connective membrane, which ex- tends to the tibiw; tarsi short, less than half the length of the tibiz, with the faintest trace of a groove at apex (fig. 3); trochanter with one long and one short hair; digitules to tarsi and claw ordinary ; dermis with many circular discs surmounted with short, stiff spies; parts of the surface rugose; the rugosities viewed dorsally beautifully labyrinthiform—a very unusual character. Anal dorsal lobes large, angular, each furnished at apex with a delicate spine. Anal ring without hairs? (of this I cannot be quite certain). Anal cleft deep. Long., 5—53 mm.; wide, 2—23 mm. fig. 2. fig. 3. Hab. : in nest of Formica nigra, at Chesil Beach. Received from Mr. C. W. Dale, April 15th. Mr. Dale was only able to find two specimens, although, at my suggestion, he searched a second time for them. He remarks—“ I have seen similar insects in the nests of F. flava and F congerens before now, but mistook them for larve of beetles.’’ Its colour pattern is very like that of Signoretia luzule, L. Dufour, and it is one of the largest of our British Coccids, and a clearly distinct species. May 11th, 1893. 1893. ] : 207 [P.S.—- My note (ante p. 188) has brought to light some interesting material. Mr. C. W. Dale looked in vain for a further supply of Lecanopsis formicarum; but at my suggestion, however, he kindly forwarded a specimen of what he recorded in this Magazine as Ripersia Tomlinii, Newst. (vol. xxviui, p. 219), which, after treatment with potash, proved identical with the above; the specimen only differing from the types in having a few long white filaments on the dorsal surface of the last four or five segments. These seem to suggest the formation of a sac, but I fail to obtain further evidence that such is the case. By almost the same post that brought Mr. Dale’s specimen I received several specimens of a large Coccid from Mr. Luff, of Guernsey, which he had found under stones in ants’ nests. These were each enclosed in a sac of thick white felting, except at the cephalic extremity, where the body of the ? closes it, as in Signoretia, Hriopeltis, and Lichtensia, but drops out after laying its eges. I at first thought that Mr. Luff’s specimens were a more ad- vanced stage of the Lecanopsis, but I have no conclusive proof that they are. The antenne of Mr. Luff’s specimens are eight-jointed as in the above, but they are very different in structure: the latter are like those of a Lecanium, those of the Lecanopsis most like.those of a Monophlebid. For the present I am inclined to think Mr. Luff’s specimens are referable to Giard’s Spermococcus fullax (Bullet. Ent. Soe. France, 10 Mai, 1893), of which I will give a more detailed account later. I can only add how very grateful I am to Messrs. Dale and Luff for the trouble they have taken in searching for the speci- mens.— July 22nd, 1893]. PHYSOKERMES (Targioni-Tozzetti), Signoret. PHYSOKERMES ABIETIS. Chermes abietis rotundus, Geoffroy, Hist. abreg. Ins. (1764), 11, 507, 7. Coccus abietis, Mod., Gétheb. Vetens. Handl. (1778), i, 27, 20; Gmel., Syst. Nat., 1, 2221, 82 (1791). Lecanium abietis, Signoret, Ess. Cochen., 273, 50. Coccus picee, Schr., Fauna Boica (1801), 146, 1271; Boisduval, Entom. Hort. (1867), 320. Coceus hemicryphus, Dalm., K. Vet. Acad. Handl. for 1825, p. 369, 6, tab. iv, figs. 18—27. Physokermes hemicryphus, Sign., Ess. Cochen., p. 280, pl. xiii, figs. i—ic. Coccus (Lecanium) racemosus, Ratz., Stett. Ent. Zeit., iv, 204; Forstins., iii, 191, 1. Lecanium racemosum, Goureau, Ins. nuis., 159. Signoret, Ess. Cochen., 275, 52, pl. xii, fig. 16. 9 adult, dark, or light reddish-brown; parasitized specimens generally much piuler; form very variable, and according to position on the food-plant ; generally of 208 [ September, the form shown in the fig. 1 profile, 2 ventral, and 3 anal dorsal and ventral view ; this form is found only beneath the bud-scales of the spruce fir, but when the scales are in exposed situations on the twigs, they are always more or less globular or spherical, and exactly like a small Kermes; but there is every form intermediate between the above, yet, as previously stated, the form shown in the illustration is by far the most common. Of ae whatever form, however, that portion of the insect which is attached to the <, branch, or hidden behind ; the bud-scale, whether dorsal or ventral, is always very uneven, and fits exactly into the uneven surface on which it rests, or which covers it. Gf 2 Ly 3 behind the bud-seales always has the anal portion of the body exposed, as shown in The form which locates itself the fig. 3 (three 9); sometimes as many as five or six females are arranged round the stem of a single one-year-old branch of the fir. In all cases the exposed portions of their bodies are smooth and shiny, except in very old examples, which become almost covered in resin from the fir tree ; extending from the anus on the ventral surface to a little beyond the middle is a long deep slit, formed by the folding inwards of the ventral skin; a diagrammatic section at this portion.of the body is shown at fig. 4; the extent of this slit is not easy to trace, owing to the brittle nature of the scale, but it is always clear and wide at the anal extremity; at this place on either side is a conspicuous blunt ‘“cornicle,” and immediately above on the dorsal surface are the true anal dorsal lobes, which, from their rounded ends, appear as two minute cornicles; extending from each of the large ventral cornicles is a straight deep fovea, which extends along the ventral surface parallel with the “slit,” forming long rounded carine ; radiating from the anal dorsal lobes are three short and generally well defined strie, one dorsal and one subdorsal, but they are rarely seen in parasitized specimens, owing to the swollen nature of the dermis. Rostrum uniarticulate ; legs and antenne wanting; dermis finely reticulated with an irregular honeycomb-like tesselation and numerous large clear circular cells. Long., 23—45 mm. g second stage: pale reddish-brown, or pink, exactly corresponding to the colour of the bark on which it rests ; this, together with the small size, render the scales very difficult to be seen; their shape and outline is almost exactly like a young Lecanium of the hesperidum type; long-oval, widest at thoracic segment ; margin in front nearly straight, with many stiff hairs; legs and antenne present ; caudal scales small, and duller than the rest of the body. They are always fixed head downwards. dé unknown to me in any stage, although I have searched most carefully for them since the year 1891. Ratzeburg (J.c.), however, figures and describes it; and, with the exception of the antenne, it does not appreciably differ from the ¢ of an ordinary Lecanium. The number of joints to the antenne are. given as nine, but this, as Signoret states (p. 276), must be an error. 1893.] : 209 Larva: this is well described and figured by Signoret (J.c.). They appear in July, and almost directly after hatching locate themselves behind the bud-scales at the base of the young, tender, growing shoot of the spruce ; here they fix themselves head downwards, and pass the winter without materially altering in form. Hab. : in spruce fir (Abies excelsa). First taken July 4th, 1891, at Delamere Forest, Cheshire, where it is very common on some of the trees, so abundant, that I venture to say it must be injurious. As examples of protective resemblance, I know of none more interesting ; they are so much like an unopened bud of the spruce fir, that it is difficult to detect them at first sight. They are terribly subject to the attacks of a Chalcid? parasite, which hatches at the same time as the larve, and I imagine that the latter are parasitized before they fix themselves behind the bud-scales, &c., for they would not be accessible afterwards, except in the adult stage, when they are not attacked. As to the synonymy of the species :— Geoffroy (l.c) says—“It is quite circular and spherical. Its colour is shaded chestnut-brown. It is found on the branches of spruce firs, chiefly towards their bifurcations.” This exactly applies to the form described above, and which I find near the bifureations of the small branches; such forms I take it are the normal ones, as there is nothing in the way to arrest the natural development, except parasites, and these would tend to make the seale more spherical, and not depressed or cut off. Gmelin (/.c.) only refers to Geoffroy as above, and to: Modeer. No description, only “ Hab. in spruce fir. Chestnut-brown.”’ Schrank (J.¢.) states that it “lives among the needles of the pines (Fichte). Boat-shaped, or more distinctly of the form of an egg cut so that it presents the larger axis parallel, without silky matter, light brown, paler at the end.” So far as the description is concerned, it agrees very well with the specimens of the commoner form which I find at the base of the spruce fir leaves, and beneath the “ bud-scales.”” I presume that “ Fichte” is the spruce fir. The term “boat-shaped” I imagine applies to ex- ternal characters alone, 7. e., the characters of the dorsal surface. As to the hemicryphus of Dalman, the description of it given by Signoret (/.c.), p. 280, agrees with my specimens, but more especially with those which are found in exposed situations on the branches. There is one exception, however. I do not find the regular cor- rugations or carine shown in Signoret’s fig. 1, ventral view, but I do not attach much importance to this. The figs. of the ? are copies of 210 [September, Dalman’s, those of the larva Signoret’s. The descriptions and fig. of the latter in every way agree with my specimens, indeed, the larva might have been figured from them so exactly alike are they. Of the ? , however, Signoret only had one specimen, from which his descrip- tion was made. Had he have seen the various forms that I have, I venture to state that he would have adopted the same synonymy. Ratzeburg’s description and figs. (J.c.) with few exceptions un- doubtedly agree with mine, which I have no hesitation in saying are really identical with Ratzeburg’s. His fig. 8 F of the wnder-side of the adult ¢ is, however, very mechanical and misleading. The six large cornicles shown on the ventral surface at the anterior extremity cannot be more than accidental protuberances produced by the in- equalities of the food-plant; for this and the corresponding dorsal portion fits very closely between the bud-scales and the branch, as stated above, and as clearly illustrated by Ratzeburg’s fig. 8 X F E. The bud-seales, however, are very scantily shown; generally much more of the insect is hidden beneath them, which is of importance as affecting the shape of the insect. ‘The very prominent rostrum between the cornicles, bearing the filaments, is also undoubtedly exaggerated. But the long, broad, ventral carine near the anus, producing the ? “blunt cornicles”” at the extremity and the long ventral slit between them are exactly what I find in all my specimens. His fig. 8 P of the larva compares exactly with my specimens, and, moreover, it also agrees with Signoret’s fig. of the larva of Phy. hemicryphus, Dalm. Signoret’s figure of Ratzeburg’s C. racemosus is undoubtedly a reduced copy of that author’s, and is very misleading, in that he has left out the long and very characteristic ventral slit which is of the greatest importance (Hssai, p. 278, pl. xii, fig. 16). I had always looked upon Signoret’s fig. as showing the dorsal aspect of the 9, for which it may well pass, and undoubtedly has passed. Signoret, at p. 275, gives an abridged description of the species, and states it might possibly be the Z. abietis, Geoff. Later, at p. 282, he states that he does not know the species, and is doubtful as to its position, and says that he has provisionally placed it in the genus Lecanium, and then again refers it to the absetis of Geoffroy. Iam very greatly obliged to Mr. J. W. Douglas for the valued assistance he has rendered in the synonymy of the species; without his help this portion would have been left untouched. This very interesting species is an addition to our fauna. Chester: May 17th, 1893. 1893. ] : 211 Colias Hyale, §c., in the Isle of Sheppey.—It is with much pleasure that I record the occurrence, in fair numbers, of Oolias Hyale in this locality. I first ’ noticed the butterfly on the 12th, in a lucerne field within half a mile of Sheerness ; subsequent visits to this and other fields close at hand have produced a beautiful series, though as yet the insect cannot be called abundant, half a dozen examples representing the result of a good hard forenoon’s work. So far the males have appeared in much the greater number, only three or four females having been taken. Nearly all are in very fine and fresh condition, many having the appearance of being just out of the chrysalis. The great year for this species in the Isle of Sheppey (as elsewhere) was 1868, when it might fairly have been said to swarm in the lucerne fields in August; in 1872 it appeared here in moderate numbers, and since that year, with the exception of a solitary example taken in the Isle of Portland in 1885 (Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. xxii, p. 111), I have not seen it alive in England. I understand, however, that four specimens were taken in this Island last year by a local collector. Colias Edusa has not yet made its appearance here this season, though on July 15th I saw two worn-looking specimens on the railway bank between Exeter and Salisbury, when I was travelling from Devonport to London. Most of the ordinary butterflies seem fairly plentiful here this season (especially Pararge Me- gera, Chrysophanus Phileas, and Lycena Icarus), but Pyrameis cardui is decidedly much scarcer than usual. Hesperia lineola was very common at the end of July on the rough, grassy sea wall at Elmley, and even more abundant on the face of our cliffs, where its better known congener, H. Thaumas, is found with it in compara- tively scanty numbers, the relative proportion of the two species being, I should say, about ten lineola to one Thaumas. ‘The flight of both species is quite over now.— JAMES J. WALKER, 23, Ranelagh Road, Sheerness: August 17th, 1893. Colias Edusa in Co. Mayo.—On July 7th, near Westport, a fine g Colias Edusa crossed the road in front of me and settled in an adjoining field. It seemed to be freshly out, but was the only one I saw.—C. W. Warts, Belfast: July, 1898. Second brood of Thanaos Tages—On Monday, August 7th, 7. Tages was abundant on the hills east of Ashford, and to the west also many specimens were seen. Of late years my time for collecting butterflies has been very limited, and I cannot be sure whether a second brood is the rule or the exception. I do not think it is so abundant as the first—CuHarLEes ViccErRs, 36, Hardinge Road, Ashford, Kent: August 9th, 1893. Second broods in 1893.—Being at Brighton on July 15th, I took a walk to Bevendean, and was rather surprised to find the second brood of Lycena Adonis on the wing, although ¢ did not see many; ZL. Alexis was in great numbers, with a few I. Agestis, which has been very abundant, as a second brood, at Reading, where I first noted it on July lst; Z. Corydon was also well represented ; Polyommatus Phileas very common, and it seems so everywhere this season. Hesperia sylvanus was out here and at Basingstoke this year early in May, and when I was at Basing- stoke at Whitsuntide it was practically over. I did not notice it again until July 2nd, when specimens were beautifully fresh, and on July 9th it was plentiful and in fine order. I think that this was a second brood. I have a note that in 1888 it was 212 |September, out in the last week of July with H. comma, so a second brood is not improbable in a season like the present.— A. H. Hamm, 24, Hatherley Road, Reading: July 24th, 18938. Macroglossa stellatarum.— This species has been unusually abundant here this season, for on visiting a favourite spot for it I found them flying in profusion to the flowers of the viper’s buglos (Echium vulgare), and you only had to watch a patch to secure a good series; it is many years since they have been taken here in any abundance, and then in nothing like the numbers this season. I have since taken the larvee on both Galiwm mollugo and G. verum, and they were to be found — in all stages at one time. Some few years ago I also found it feeding on G. palustre. —Ip. Zygena trifolii.cIn a recent number I called attention to the discovery by Mr. W. H. B. Fletcher of the curious habits in larve of Zygena trifolii, of passing more than one winter in that state. Mr. C. A. Briggs draws my attention to a similar and prior observation by his brother, Mr. T. H. Briggs, recorded in the Pro- ceedings of the Entomological Society for 1875. This was, undoubtedly, an oversight on my part.—Cuas. G. Barrerr, Nunhead, 8.H.: August 18th, 1898. Lepidoptera at Wicken Fen and Hunstanton.—June 14th to 22nd last E spent at Wicken working the Fen and adjoining lane. Lepidoptera were fairly plentiful, but there were only two really good nights at “light,” those of the 14th and 17th. On the former of these I took ten Nascia cilialis, and on the 17th fifteen more, besides missing several. Other visitors included Macrogaster arundinis, Ptilodontis palpina, Notodonta ziczac, Simyra venosa, Leucania pudorina in plenty, Hydrelia unca, Plusia festuce, Chilo mucronellus, with Herminia cribralis and Chilo phragmi- tellus in plenty. Sugar was more attractive than appears to have been the case in many parts of the country, as on most evenings a fair haul was made. Of “takeable” species, Aplecta advena and Leucania pudorina took the lead in point of numbers, both being very plentiful; their companions were Thyatira derasa, Acronycta megacephala, Leucania conigera, L. comma, Xylophasia hepatica, Mamestra anceps plentiful, Apamea gemina abundant and variable, Agrotis puta, A. ravida taken the first night and several afterwards, an unusually early time for the species, Hadena adusta, Boarmia repandata a fine form, Timandra amataria common, and very many other species, including a big 9 Cossus ligniperda flyiug about a sugared tree trunk. A notable absentee was Apamea unanimis, which is sometimes the most abundant Noctua at Wicken in June; I have seen all the sugared patches covered with them, probably thousands in a night, whereas this year not one was to be seen! Mothing on and about the Fen produced Collix sparsata, Herminia cribralis and EHpione apiciaria all in abundance, with Nola cucullatella, Hemithea thymiaria, Acidalia immutata and several others of the genus; Hupithecia subumbrata, Lobophora sexalisata, Scotosia vetulata, S. rhamnata, Paraponyx stratiotalis, Nemophora me- tarella, Anesychia funerella, and many others. Larve of Papilio Machaon, about half to two-thirds grown, were feeding on the Peucedanum. One afternoon was spent on Chippenham Fen, where the pretty Bankia argentula was out in plenty, but little else was noted there. On the 22nd I went forward to Hunstanton for a 1893.] y 213 couple of days, and was very pleased to find that Hupithecia ewtensaria still held its - own well on the same ditch where I took the larve so freely in 1889; several females I beat out of the Artemisia maritima deposited eggs, from which I have now a nice lot of larvee feeding—Guo. T. Porritt, Huddersfield : August 8th, 1893. Acherontia Atropos in a bee-hive.—On June 11th of this year a fine specimen of A. Atropos was seen issuing from a bee-hive belonging to Mr. John Waterfield of Kibworth. It was covered with bees which were pushing it out at the entrance, and endeavouring to kill it. Apparently it had been stung, for it seemed unable to fly, yet made a loud squeaking noise as if in self defence. I have seen the specimen and can vouch for the veracity of my informant.—C. T. Crutrwett, Kibworth Rectory, Leicester: July 21sé, 1893. [That Acherontia Atropos enters hives has long been notorious. It sometimes happens that the bees cannot eject the intruder, and dispose of its body by en- tombing it in wax.— Eps. ]. Variety of the larva of Acherontia Atropos.—On the 14th of this month, a handsome dark variety of the larva of the “death’s head”’ was brought to me from our village, where it had been found on Lycium barbarum, the “tea-tree.” It was well-grown in its last skin, and in general appearance and pattern resembled the variety figured in Buckler’s “‘ Larve of the British Butterflies and Moths,” vol. ii, plate xxi, fig. la, but differed from it somewhat in intensity of markings, and more decidedly in having (1) the white on the first few segments beautifully tinged with pink; (2) the rest of the body entirely brown (of various shades), with no trace of red in it; and (3) the horn of the colour of ivory, instead of brown, as in the figure. Three other larve of 4A. At¢ropos occurred on Lycium barbarum in the same spot, but they were all of the usual type; one of them was unfortunate enough to catch the eye of an old woman, who, feeling sure that it must be “a locust,” placed it on the ground, and threw a brick on the top of it! It may be added that the variety figured by Mr. Buckler was found feeding on Solanum dulcamara.—Eustace R. Banxes, The Rectory, Corfe Castle: July 24th, 1893. Gelechia (Lita) strelitziella not a British insect.—In the Ent. Ann. for 1872, p- 123, this species was recorded as new to Britain by the late Mr. H. T. Stainton, who there says, “The Rev. E. N. Bloomfield met with two specimens of this insect at Lowestoft, July 28th, 1871, beating them from marram (4mmophila arundinacea).” While at Mountsfield, and engaged in looking over some of Mr. Stainton’s British Gelechie, on May 4th, 1892—the last occasion on which I had the pleasure of ‘seeing him—I caught sight of a single moth, bearing a label in his well-known hand- writing :—“ H. A., /72, p.123. Lowestoft, 22.7.71. Bloomfield, 5/73. Strelitziella, H.-8.,” which I at once recognised as a fine example of Gielechia celerella, Doug. Mr. Stainton, however, could not entertain any doubt about its identity, so the matter was dropped. But on my writing this year to ask the Rev. HE. N. Bloomfield for the loan of the other specimen that he took at the same time (Ent. Ann., J. c.), he informed me that he had been in error (and had, in his “ Lepidoptera of Suffolk,” subsequently corrected the mistake) in thinking that it was identical with that which he had sent to Mr. Stainton, and that, in consequence, the claim of strelit- T . 21 4. [September, ziella to a place in the British list rested solely and entirely on the single moth in Mr. Stainton’s cabinet. Having again examined it just recently, I can confidently state that it is a genuine G. celerella, Doug., and quite distinct from the true strelitziella, H.-S., of which there is a beautiful series in the Stainton collection of continental Tineina. As Lita strelitziella seems never to have occurred in Britain, the name must now disappear from our lists. Lord Walsingham fully agrees with me in the matter.—Ip.: July 25th, 1893. Note on Hesperia Acteon.—As Mr. C. W. Dale, on p. 164 of the current volume of this Magazine, refers to “the second brood” of H. Act@on, it would be very interesting to know if there is any proof of the existence of a second brood in this country. As my whole life (with the exception of the intervals due to temporary absence from home) has been spent within a five minutes’ walk of one of the haunts of the “ Lulworth Skipper,” and in the very centre of the best district for it, I can claim a very close acquaintance with it; and yet, although I have taken it on May 3lst (and know that it was out several days earlier!) in an exceptionally early year (1893) and locality, as well as on September 8th in a very backward season (1888) and later spot, all my experience tends to show that there is only one long brood. _ If there are two, it is strange that there is no diminution of their numbers in the middle of the summer, still more strange that neither I, nor any one else whom I know, can, in spite of repeated efforts, find any trace whatever of the larve of the second brood, although those of the first brood may be collected freely, and of very various sizes, at any time in the latter part of the spring and in early summer! The sketch of the life-history as given by Mr. Dale on p. 218 of his “ History of our British Butterflies” (recently published as a supplement to the “ Young Naturalist’”’), is rather difficult to follow, for he thinks (1) that there are two broods, one in June the other in August ; (2) that from the eggs laid in June the larve feed up before winter, and hibernate in the chrysalis state ; and (8) that from the eggs laid in July and August the larve hibernate small, feed up in spring, being full-fed in the middle or end of June, and remain about a fortnight in the chrysalis state. But, if the June eggs produce butterflies in the following June, and the July and August eggs appear as imagines in the first half of the following July, how can there be any second brood, and what is the history of the August butterflies? I cannot believe that with us the species ever “ hibernates in the chrysalis state,’ and know of no facts that support the idea of the Jarve hibernating as such. As regards the food of the larve, in his “ History of our British Butterflies,” Mr. Dale, while naming three other grasses, makes no mention of Brachypodium pinnatum, which is the one and only known food-plant of H. Actgon in Britain. Those that he gives are (1) Brachypodium sylvaticum, but Mr. Buckler’s error in at first identifying B. pinnatum as its ally was pointed out in Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. xxv, p. 283 ; (2) Triticum repens, upon which Mr. Buckler fed it in confinement; and (8) Calamagrostis epigejos, on which Professor Zeller found the larvee in Austria.—Ip. : July 19th, 1893. The Plague of Wasps.—From the accounts given in the newspapers it appears that wasps are very numerous in many counties this season, but I should doubt whether they can anywhere be more abundant than in this district. By the end of a) aM 1893. ] : 215 ‘July our gardeners had already destroyed 54 nests of ground-wasps in our garden and shrubbery, and in the few fields close around them, and doubtless this number will be largely increased within the next month or so, for the insects seem almost as plentiful and troublesome as ever! In fact, three more nests have already been taken. Our previous “best on record” is a “take” of 21 nests in the course of a single season, though perhaps the search has generally been confined to a rather smaller area. It is impossible to prevent the armies of hungry marauders from helping themselves very liberally to the fruit on the trees, though, fortunately for us, the vrop is so exceptionally heavy that there is plenty for all parties concerned. The nests of the tree wasps have also been more common than usual.—Ip.: August 8th, 1893. Lestes nympha, Selys, and other dragon-flies in Cambridgeshire.—While at Thorney, Cambridgeshire, for a fortnight in the middle of July, I paid special attention to the dragon-flies of the district. As my captures include one species of some interest, a list of them is given here. The locality should be a very good one for this group, but circumstances were rather adverse during my stay; the fine weather broke up just before my arrival and gave place to rather sunless and windy days. Some of the common species of Agrionide abounded, but the larger dragon- flies were not numerous. The dykes of Knarr Fen were most productive, both as regards species and individuals. The list is as follows:—Sympetrum sanguineum, Miller, frequent at one of the Knarr Fen dykes; seen occasionally elsewhere (with the exception of 4. grandis, this was the only one of the larger dragon-flies seen at Wicken the one day I spent there). S&S. scoticum, Donov., two at Knarr Fen. Libellula quadrimaculata, L., a few taken at Knarr Fen. schna grandis, L., generally distributed, but not very common; a few specimens of another #schna, probably cyanea, were seen but not taken. Calopteryx splendens, Harris, Thorney Dyke. Lestes nympha, Selys, only one of this interesting species, of which little appears to have been seen of recent years; I now believe it occurred. in limited numbers at one of the Knarr Fen Dykes along with Z. sponsa, but at the time I dia not appreciate the differences between the two. J. sponsa, Hans., everywhere common. IJschnura elegans, V.d. Lind.,common. Enallagma cyathigerum, Charp., common, Thorney River. Agrion pulchellum, V.d. Lind., very abundant. 4. puella, L., not common. Hrythromma najas, Hans.,a few noticed at one restricted spot on the Thorney River; not seen elsewhere.—K. J. Morton, Carluke, N.B.: August, 1893. [I am delighted to find that Lestes nympha is still with us. During the last quarter of a century I have examined several hundreds of L. sponsa, living and dead, in the hope of finding nympha among them, but in vain.—R. McLacuran]. Lema Evichsoni, Suffr.,in Co. Dublin.—During a day’s collecting near the village of Santry, Co. Dublin, I captured a large number of specimens of Lema; upon examination they all proved to be Lema lichenis, with the exception of one, which was evidently referable to the very rare Lema Erichsoni, Suffy. Canon Fowler has seen the specimen, and confirmed the identification. I have lately retaken the species in some numbers at the some locality, by sweeping, chiefly in one small grassy place, although a few examples occurred at some distance.—J. N. HA.sBeErt, 18, Nelson Street, Dublin: August, 1893. Ww 2} 216 [September, _ Creindela sylvatica versus Panurgus calearatus.—Y esterday (August 7th) I was interested in watching a specimen of Cicindela sylvatica entirely demolish a 9 of Panurgus calearatus. I did not see the actual capture, as when I observed the Cicindela it had just eaten the posterior segments of its prey’s abdomen; it made light work of the other segments, but seemed to find the thorax more trying, whereas for the time it discarded the head altogether, biting it off and leaving it on the ground ; when, however, it had duly finished the thorax it returned to the head and quickly devoured that also. The legs of the bee kept up movement for some time after most of the abdomen was removed. The only sign left of the conflict was the bright orange pollen off the bee’s legs, which was rejected and left in two little heaps on the sand. ‘The entire meal could not have occupied more than two minutes.— EDWARD SAUNDERS, St. Ann’s, Woking: August 8th, 1893. Coleopterous notes from Woking, &e.—The dry hot summer seems to have just: suited the larger Coccinellide (and, perhaps, their food, Aphides, as well), for I have met with here, in the vicinity of Woking, or at Fleet, about ten miles distant, sixteen of our larger British species this season. Hippodamia mutabilis, by no means a common species in my experience, has been by far the most abundant at Woking, swarming on grass stems and on low plants, in cultivated fields, towards evening in May, but now almost over; it has not been uncommon even in my garden. At Woking I have also noticed C. 11-punctata, 7-punctata, variabilis, bipunctata, and 14-punctata (all more or less abundant), and C. 22-punctata and Hxochomus 4-pustu- latus sparingly, in the lanes and meadows; C. odlongo-guttata (including a small variety with the oblong pallid spots on the elytra almost obliterated), ocellata, and 18-guttata, more or less common on the pines; and C. hieroglyphica, black var., on the heath. At Fleet, C. obliterata and 14-guttata and both Chilocorus in their usual habitats. The Anisotomide, however (some of which were so abundant at Woking last year at this time), are conspicuous by their absence. This I attribute to the very dry weather being unsuitable to the growth of the underground fungi upon _which they are supposed to subsist, and perhaps, more particularly, to the frequent forest and heath fires having burnt up a great deal of the undergrowth in the pine woods, &c.,so0 that nothing but charred ground is to be seen in many places. A few local species of other families have occurred during the past month, either to Mr. J.J. Walker or myself, as Sphindus dubius, with its larva (not rare), Aspidophorus orbiculatus, Lathridius testaceus, and Corticaria obscura (5) and rufula, in powdery fungus on pine stumps; Byrrhus murinus and Syntomium, in sand pits; Cassida equestris on Mentha, and Rhinoncus inconspectus and subfasciatus on Polygonum, in marshy places.—G@. C. Cuampion, Horsell, Woking: August 14th, 1893. Reviews. Tue Lire or A BUTTERFLY; a Chapter in Natural History for the general reader: by SamureL H. ScuppER. 12mo, pp. 182, and 4 plates. New York: Henry Holt and Co. 1893. Brier GUIDE TO THE COMMONER BUTTERFLIES OF THE NORTHERN UNITED. STaTES AND CANADA: by the same Author. 8vo, pp. 206. New York: Henry Holt and Co. 1893. : | | vt 1803. | : ; 2h These two nicely printed and otherwise well got up books externally resemble each other in everything save size, and are issued simultaneouely. The first named is evidently intended as introductory, so far as generalities are concerned. Both are additional proofs of the untiring energy of their well-known author. In the “ Life of a Butterfly’ we have, of course, an introduction and other Chapters that would answer to almost any species ; but the type taken as expository is Anosia Plexippus, and when treating more especially on this the author contrives to give, in a short chapter, an account of its extraordinary migrations within the last half century. The Chapter entitled, ‘A Lesson in Classification,” may be read with interest. In the “ Brief Guide” we learn that the author has long had in preparation a Manual of the Butterflies of North America, to which this is a popular prelude so far as regards the restricted geographical area embraced by it. The introductory portion includes a good deal that appears in the “ Life,’ in a modified form, and extended so as to meet the requirements of the subject. ‘There is also a brief historical chapter on the literature of American Butterflies. Then comes a formida- ble Key to the groups and genera, based on the perfect insects, pupe and caterpillars. This is followed by a diagnostic and descriptive account of each genus and species, with copious notes, and a glossary. Finally, there is the inevitable “ Appendix,” with instructions for Collecting, &c., &e. This second volume is of course mainly of interest to American readers, but, from its method of treatment, it will be useful to European students, and there is a common specific element, slight though it be,in the Butterflies of the two continents. To those who know the author’s views on generic and other nomenclature, and his splitting up of the larger genera into a multitude of smaller ones, the nomenclature used in this work will not come as a shock, but we doubt if the “ keenest insight into valuations” (“ Life,” p. 137) will ever be taken as more than the result of individual opinion in many instances. -This is not a matter of much importance outside the question of needless (?) multiplication of generic terms. We cannot omit an expression of regret that the author should have found (in most cases coined) an English name for each species. Many of these are as absurd, or even more so, than those pro- posed for our own Butterflies and Moths, and in our case the tendency now is to ignore altogether this childish practice, save in cases where ancient custom has made the names familiar. According to the author, our “Camberwell Beauty ” should be styled the “ Mourning Cloak!” Is this a question of priority ? Society. Tue South Lonpon EntomonoaicaL AND NaturaL History Sociery: July 27th, 1893. —J. Jenner WEIR, Esq., F.L.S., President, in the Chair. Mr. A. Robinson exhibited a magnificent series of Callimorpha Hera, L., bred from ova obtained from a female captured in Devonshire in August, 1892. He mentioned that among those he bred a large number were deformed in the hind- wings, and principally in the left one. Mr. Robinson also had two specimens of Dicranura bicuspis, Bork., from Tilgate Forest, one being a very light variety. Mr. 218 (September, - Turner exhibited a fine series of Pempelia palumbella, Hb., from Oxshott, also a few Thera variata, Schiff., one being almost unicolorous, and 7. firmata, Hb., &e. Mr. Dennis brought a box of Thecla betule, bred at the end of June, one having the orange band somewhat smaller than usual. Mr. R. Adkin exhibited specimens of Smerinthus populi, L., from Lewisham, the New Forest, and Sutherlandshire, for comparison, three of those shown being of that very light brownish form that occasionally occurs, one from each of the localities named; also a few Smerinthus ocellatus, L., bred from larve found at Lewisham. Mr. Barrett exhibited the larvee referred to by him at the last meeting, and made some comments thereon. These larvee, if not actually still alive, were in a state of very fresh preservation, and Mr. Weir said he thought there was hardly any doubt about their having been stored by one of the Mason wasps, as food for its young. Mr. H. Williams exhi- bited five pups of Leucophasia sinapis, L., for the purpose of showing the gradual development of the perfect insect, one of which emerged during the course of the evening. The average dates were: ova laid May 26th, hatched June 6th, the first pupating on July 9th. Mr. Step exhibited the following species of galls from Epsom, viz.: Andricus fecundatrix, Htg., Neuroterus lenticularis, Olivier, Andricus ostreus, Cynips Kollari, Rhodites nervosus, Curt., R. rose, Htg., and R. eglanterie, Htg. August 10th, 1893.—The President in the Chair. Mr Frohawk exhibited specimens of Macroglossa bombyliformis, together with a species of humble-bee, which it mimics, captured in company over rhododendrons in the New Forest, on 21st May last. Mr. Jenner Weir exhibited some cases which had been found under a syeamore by a neighbour of his, Mr. Tolhurst, at Becken- ham. He said that attention had been called to these cases by seeing them hopping on a gravel walk, a power which they retained for some days. The cases were circular discs, about 13 mm. in diameter, and had been made from the upper cuticle of the sycamore leaf, forming one side, and silk the other. Upon examining the leaves of the tree, the round spots from which the cases were partly formed were plainly visible, and also the large blotch, from which the larva had eaten the parenchyma. It was at first thought that they might belong to a Tischeria, but they have since been identified by Mr. McLachlan as being the work of a saw-fly, Phyllotoma aceris, Kaltenbach, a species already known in this country; a some- what detailed life-history was given by C. Healy in the Ent. Mo. Mag., iv, pp. 105—107 (1867), but the most complete is that by Ritzema Bos, in the Tijdschrift voor Entomologie, vol. xxv, pp. 7—16, pl. iii. The President also exhibited nearly adult larve of Hemerophila abruptaria, and drew attention to the fact that two pairs of prolegs were, as usual in Geometers, fully developed, and that there were also two other imperfect pairs in front of these. He considered these very imperfect prolegs to be vestigial. Mr. Robt. Adkin exhibited a specimen of Sesia eynipi- formis, bred from pups found in Sussex, and called attention to the usual red colouring of the bar, and a portion of the costal streak of the left fore-wing being replaced by yellow; he also exhibited a series of Spilosoma lubricipeda, bred from Yorkshire larve, in some of which the spots showed a tendency to become elongated. Mr. C. Oldham exhibited series of Sphinx ligustri, Apamea ophiogramma, Calymnia affinis, and other species, chiefly taken at Woodford. H. Wi111AMs, Hon. Secretary. 1893. | . 219 REMARKS UPON THE SYNONYMY OF SOME RATHER OBSCURE DIPTERA IN THE FAMILY ANTHOMYIIDA, TOGETHER WITH A NOTICE OF SOME UNRECORDED BRITISH SPECIES. BY R. H. MEADE. The difficulty of describing small insects accurately, so that one species may be clearly distinguished from another by the description alone, without the aid of figures, is very great ; especially among little Diptera, which are often very similar, both in structure and appear- ance. Owing to this difficulty, many species have been named over and over again by different titles by different authors, and the same species has sometimes been described more than once under different names by the same author ; thus it becomes almost impossible to clear up the synonymy without reference to the original specimens preserved in different museums. I have been induced to make these remarks by the perusal of a very interesting paper by Herr V. P. Stein upon the types of some of the Anthomyiide, in the collections of Fallén and Zetterstedt, which he has carefully examined in the Museum at Lund.* By these re- searches Stein has been able to clear up some difficult points, and enable Dipterists to decide upon the true or original names of several disputed species. I must refer those who are much interested in the subject to Stein’s paper itself, as I only wish to draw attention to a few species, the original names of which were a source of considerable doubt and difficulty to me when I published my Annotated List of British Anthomyiide.t | SPILOGASTER DUPLARIS, Zett. Under this label Stein found the following species placed : first came a male of Sp. communis, Dsv., this was followed by three males of Sp. duplicata, Mgn., then came another specimen of Sp. communis, marked duplicata, and, lastly, one of Sp. duplicata, labelled Sp. quadrimaculata, Fln. This shows that Zetterstedt con- founded the males of Sp. communis and duplicata with his duplaris. The two former species are certainly distinct, though they were mixed up by Rondani, as well as Zetterstedt ; the last, however, as described by Zetterstedt, was merely a variety of one of the others (probably Sp. duplicata) ; so the name of duplarzs must lapse. I described a species in my list under this name, which I submitted to the late Prof. Rondani, and he said he thought it was the Sp. duplaris, Zett. I am now convinced that it was only a variety of Sp. duplicata. Herr v. Stein also described a Spilo- gaster as the Sp. duplaris, Zett. ?,{ which differs from both Sp. communis and Sp. duplicata in having only three post-sutural, central, thoracic bristles, instead of four. * Ent. Nachrichten, Nos. 20 and 21, 1892. + Ent. Mon. Mag., vol. xviii, p. 1. t Ent. Nachrichten, 1889. 220 (September, 1893. This is the same as my Sp. atripes.* Stein I find still retains the name of Sp. duplaris for this species,t though he admits that it is not the Sp. duplaris of Zett. ; under these circumstances, his name must also lapse. CHORTOPHILA TRAPEZINA, Zett. Stein found that the specimens in Zetterstedt’s collection labelled A. trapezina were identical with the Ch. impudica of Rondani. On looking over some Anthomyiide, which I received some years ago from Herr Kowarz, I found two labelled A. trapezina, Zett., and two others named Ch. impudica, Rnd. Upon com- paring them together, I at once see that they belong to the same species, so L have no doubt that the names are synonymous. Stein found an indistinctly marked specimen of Ch. trapezina in the collection, named A. odontogaster, Zett. This species is, therefore, identical with the others, and the name of odontogaster, as well as that of impudica, Rnd., must sink into synonyms of trapezina. CHORTOPHILA CINEREA, FIn. Stein found a number of different species placed under this name, by both Fallén and Zetterstedt, and the description given by these authors are so imperfect, that it is impossible to identify the species. In my list I included two distinct ones together, the males I subsequently found were those of Phorbia cepetorum, Mde., and the females I now see belong to Ch. trapezina. CHORTOPHILA STRIOLATA, F ln. Stein found Ch. pudiea, Rnd., placed under this name, as well as a male of Ph. trichodactyla, Rnd. ; neither of these will agree with Zetterstedt’s description of Ch. striolata, which is not very clear, and does not correspond well with those of Fallén and Meigen, so I think that we must reject Zetterstedt’s Ch. striolata altogether. This species, however, is a well marked one, and not uncommon in England. I formerly confounded it with Ch. trapezina, to which it bears some resemblance, but Mr. Verrall pointed out that they were distinct ; the abdomen in Ch. striolata being rather depressed and tapering, while in Ch. trapezina it is sub- cylindrical ; the anal segments of the male are also much smaller and less prominent than in Ch. trapezina, and the abdominal dorsal marks smaller and subtriangular, instead of being subquadrate. Meigen’s and Schiner’s descriptions are rather im- perfect, but that of Fallén is more characteristic ; he says: ‘“‘ Abdomen canescens convexum, incisuris nigris, linea dorsalis quoque adest e guttis nigris formata.”’ PHorBia PLATURA, Men. Three males of P. célicrura, Rnd., with one of P. trapezoides, Zett., were placed under the name of platura in Zetterstedt’s collection. This species seems involved in a good deal of obscurity. Many years ago Herr Kowarz sent me a specimen of P. edlicrura, marked A. platura, Mgn. I then sup- posed it to be named in mistake, but I now believe that these two species have often been confounded together. The larve of P. platura are said to have been found in onions, and I have bred numerous specimens of P. cilicrura myself from those bulbs, * Ent. Mo. Mag , 1889, p. 425. + Ent. Nachrichten, 1893, p. 217. October, 1893. ' , PAIL together with the larger onion-flies (P. cepetorum, Mde.). Rondani describes P. platura, Men., in addition to his P. cilicrura, and says of the former: “ pedes nigri, tibiis posticis nec intus nec antice setulosis,’ which shows that his were distinct species. Meigen and Schiner say nothing about the armature of the hind-legs in their descriptions of P. platura, so if the species which they described were identical with P. cilicrura, they must have overlooked the row of short cilie on the inner sides of the hind tibia, which are characteristic of the latter species. Stein found another specimen of P. cilicrura, placed under the name of A. Ffusciceps, Zett., in Zetterstedt’s collection, and in his description of the latter, Zetterstedt mentions the ciliated hind-legs, so there is no doubt about these two being identical. To what species Zetterstedt’s description of A. platura refers it is impossible to determine. ANTHOMYIA BRUNNEILINEA, Zett. M. Stein found that a specimen so named was identical with Hylemyia seti- erura, Rnd. > ANTHOMYIA PILIGERA, Zett. The flies placed under this name were only males of Drymeia hamata, Fln. ANTHOMYIA VILLIPES, Zett. This was identical with Ph. floccosa, Mcq. ANTHOMYIA ALBIPUNCTA, Zett. Under this title Stein found a specimen of my Hydrotea fasciculata placed ; Zetterstedt entirely overlooked the dentated fore femora, though he noticed the fasciculus of hairs on the hind-legs. He thus removed this species out of its proper genus. UNRECORDED BRITISH ANTHOMIDS. Hyprotma veLuTina, Desv. brevipennis, Lw. This shining black species bears a general resemblance to H. impexa, Lw. The eyes of the male are bare, contiguous throughout almost their whole length, leaving only a very small, black, triangular space above the antenne, in which is placed a white spot ; face black, with white reflexions ; antennz rather short ; arista slightly pubescent; thorax with scutellum shining blue-black, having four post-sutural thoracic bristles; abdomen black, with a greenish tinge, and dull grey reflexions, when viewed from behind ; it is also marked with a longitudinal black stripe, which is dilated over the second segment ; alulets brownish-yellow ; halteres black ; wings rather short, with a brownish tinge, having the cross veins rather near together, the outer one being oblique; the third and fourth longitudinal veins are parallel beyond the outer cross veins; legs black, rather slender, the fore femora have one rather small toothed tubercle near the end; the fore tibie are attenuated near the base, where there is a small tubercle, and are rather dilated and ciliated-along the distal half. Length, about 6mm. The female is smaller, with shining black thorax, and dull black abdomen, without white reflexions, but with a greyish apex. The cross U \ 999 ‘October, veins of the wings are rather further apart, and the outer one is straighter than in the male. I have only seen one British specimen of this rare fly, which I captured in July, 1891, at Grange-over-Sands, in Lancashire. Hybemyta Festiva, Zett. This handsome species bears a very close resemblance to H. hélaris, Fln., but essentially differs by having only a short haired or pubescent arista, instead of a long haired one ; the central thoracic stripe is also straight, and not dilated into a round spot, as in H. hilaris. The thorax is hoary, with a central black stripe, often trifid in front ; the sides are marked with an oblong or subtriangular black spot before the suture, and with an elongated one behind it. The scutellum is pale grey, with the margins black. The abdomen is cinereous, with a central black stripe and transverse irregular cross bands, less regular ard distinct than those in H. hilaris. The wings have the outer cross veins nearly straight, and a little oblique; legs black. A single male of this rare fly is in the Rev. E. N. Bloomfield’s collection, captured, I believe, near Hastings. HyYtemyta spinosa, Rnd. ?. This species bears considerable resemblance in form and colour to H. variata, Fn. ; it differs, however, in having a very short, instead of a long haired arista, and is rather larger. The eyes are contiguous; the forehead slightly prominent ; the face white; the antenne black, reaching nearly to the epistome, which is a little pro- jecting ; the palpi are black; the thorax yellowish-grey, with paler sides, and three or five longitudinal black stripes; scutellum grey. Abdomen cylindrico-conical, yellowish-grey, with black apex, marked with a straight, rather narrow, sub-inter- rupted, black central stripe, and with narrow transverse ones, which, when viewed from before backwards, dilate into small black spots on the sides. The edges of the segments are armed with circles of tiny black bristles ; the extremity of abdomen is thickened and furnished beneath with hairy lobes. Alule yellowish-white and small; halteres yellow ; wings slightly brunescent, with costal spine distinct; outer eross vein oblique, and somewhat sinuous, and third longitudinal vein a little curved, and diverging slightly from the fourth. Legs black; hind femora furnished with spines along their whole under surfaces; hind tibize having scattered spines of un- even lengths along their outer surfaces, and a few at the upper part of their inner sides. Length, about 6mm. I captured a single male of this fly in July, 1892, near Lake Windermere. PHORBIA INTERSECTA, Men. ?. This species, which was unknown to me until very lately, is distinguished from all the allied species by having partly pale or piceous legs, and is further characterized by having :—Eyes of male contiguous behind; forehead slightly prominent; frontal stripe rufous or black ;* epistome slightly projecting ; face white; antenne black, very short, with the second joint wider and rather longer than the third ; arista short, slightly pubescent, with the basal third thickened; palpi black ; proboscis with the extremity narrow, and somewhat elongated ; thorax dark brown with ay * Of the two male specimens which I inewre seen, the frontal stripe was rufous in one and black in the other. Rondani says it should be always rufous in this BOEBIOS, but this is a very uncertain character, varying with age. 1893.]- j De sides, and three black stripes, moderately wide and indistinct on the hinder part ; post-sutural dorsal sete three in number; scutellum black; abdomen small (shorter and narrower than thorax), thin, and flat, with the apex thickened, and furnished beneath with a small tuft of hairs,* the dorsum is marked by a straight black stripe, sometimes indistinct; alule white or yellowish; halteres yellow; wings with a yellowish tinge, especially at the base; cross veins rather near together, the outer one being straight, but rather oblique, the third and fourth longitudinal veins parallel; legs more or less rufous or piceous; fore femora quite black, and fore tibie only slightly piceous ; middle and hind femora and tibi all rufous or piceous, with the extremities of the femora, as well as the bases of the tibie, black; all the tarsi black ; hind tibiz with some scattered bristles on their outer and front sides, but not on their inner surfaces. I have only seen two male examples of this rare and well marked fly, one was captured by Mr. Billups, at Woking, and the other by Mr. A. Beaumont, in Scotland (Pitlochry) ; the legs were much paler in one than the other, but they agreed in all other characters. This species may be distinct from the A. intersecta of Meigen, I have, therefore, given a rather full description. Bradford: August 5th, 1893. ON VARIATION IN VANESSA URTIOZ AND EREBIA BLANDINA IN SCOTLAND. BY KENNETH J. MORTON, F.ES. When I had the opportunity a few months ago of showing Mr. Barrett the few Lepidoptera in my collection, he pointed out that two of my four examples of Vanessa urtice were sufliciently out of the ordinary run to deserve notice. These two insects were reared in the beginning of August, 1892, from larve gathered in a west of Scotland locality about the end of June, 1892. They are of large size, 58 mm. in expanse, and the deep orange-red ground colour has, in one of the examples, almost entirely taken the place of the yellow blotches on both wings, only a trace of yellow being visible on the costa of the fore-wing ; the other example, although not so extreme, shows a very decided inclination in the same direction. In both examples the two spots on the dise of the fore-wings are rather large. The larve from which these butterflies were reared were, doubtless, the offspring of hibernated $s, one brood in ordinary seasons being, I think, the rule in most parts of Scotland. In a season like the present, there may be two broods in the more favoured parts, as at the very beginning of July of this year I found JV. urtice flying in great abundance at the spot where the above-mentioned larve were taken, and of a form quite * Meigen says that the apex is black and shining, but it was grey in both the examples that I have seen. We2 224, [ October, different from that just described, having only an expanse of 50 mm., with yellow blotches all distinct, and the two discal spots exceptionally small. : While on the subject of variation, I may also mention that in one locality in the south of Scotland Erebia blandina (Medea) frequently occurs with the ocellated spots on both upper- and under-sides reduced to such an extent that hardly more than the white pupils remain—a condition parallel to that of the ab. Arete of Hpinephile hyperanthus. Carluke, N.B. : August 2nd, 1893. CONCHYLIS IMPLICITANA, Wre.—A RETROSPECT. BY THE RIGHT HON. LORD WALSINGHAM, MA., LL.D., F.RS., &c. My attention has been called to some remarks on Conchylis Heydeniana, H.-'5., and implicitana, Wk., published in the Ent. Mo. Mag., XX VII, 2—3 (1891), and which I readily admit may become a source of error if taken to prove that the British species of Conchylis occurring on Anthemis cotula should be rightly called Heydemana, H.-S. I should have stated that Herrich-Schaffer’s description seems to apply to this species only in part, and that as the figure which ac- | companied it had been recognised as distinct, Wocke was justified in limiting the name to the form figured, which had long been known as Heydeniana, Mn. (MS.), whereas the northern form was known and was referred to by Herrich-Schiffer in his description as Heydeniana, Koll. (Ms.). Wocke, although justified in this limitation, was in error in be- lieving that implicitana, Z. (MS.), was really the northern species Heydeniana (Koll. MS.), H.-S. text, whereas it was in fact, as shown by a specimen in the Zeller collection, Heydeniana (Mn. MS.), H.-S., fig. 369. I was evidently misled by Wocke’s error in misapplying the name implicitana to the northern form when I had the original specimen with Zeller’s own label “Jimplicitana, Man., 1849,” before me. Jt is now clear that the specimen was so labelled before the northern and southern species were separated by Wocke, and before he had thus fixed the names by preferring with good reason Herrich-Schiffer’s sufficiently correct figure to his obviously mixed description. Wocke’s transposition of the two names may be traced to his having apparently 1893.] : 225 thought that the figure was taken from a Regensburg specimen, and that the species therefore occurred in Germany as well as in Italy, whereas it probably represented one of the Italian specimens taken by Salviano which Herrich-Schiaffer selected as the typical form. Wocke’s limitation must in any case be accepted, and Walker’s reference, Cat. Lp. Ins. B.M., XXXV, 1787 (1866), under the heading implicitana, “a—ec, Ratisbon. From Dr. H.-Schiffer’s Collec- tion,” affords at least presumptive evidence that Herrich-Schiffer himself accepted it. MeLachlan, Ent. Ann., 1869, 90, pointed out that Herrich- Schaffer’s description did not refer to the species which he figured ; and failing to notice Wocke’s restriction of the name to the figure, identified the English species as Heydeniana. He correctly referred implicitana, H.-S. (= Wocke) to the description of Heydeniana, but erroneously treated Zeller’s MS. name implicitana as also a synonym, in short, following Heinemann, he reversed what Wocke had done, and adopted the name Heydeniana for the description instead of fur the figure. ; It is not improbable that there are still other species which may be distinguished among our series, but I have not been able to recog- nise Heydeniana, H.-S., fig. 369, among British specimens. No syno- nymy was given in my paper above referred to, and perhaps more information is desirable before attempting it in full, but to encourage further investigation, I give some of the principal references, together with a list of the food-plants which have been recorded for the larva, and the dates of its appearance; for all these the authors quoted are of course responsible, and it has yet to be determined whether more than one species has been recorded under these quotations. 878—impuLicirana, Wk. = HEYDENIANA HS. (partim, Wk. 3) = sUBROSEANA Wilk. (nec Hw., McL. 12) = ANTHEMIDANA Wilk. (Hein. 11). Cochylis heydeniana, HS., Schm. Hur. IV. 187. partim (1849) 1; Cochylis subroseana, Crt., Pr. Ent. Soc. Lond. (n. s.) IIT. 43—4. (1855) 2; Cochylis implicitana, Wk., in HS. Schm. Eur. VI. 157. (1856) 2; (2?) Eupecilia subroseana, Wilk., Br. Tortr. 309. (1859) 4; Stn. Man. II. 274. (1859) 5; Hupecilia anthemidana, Wilk., Br. Tortr. 309—10. (1859) 6; Stn. Man. II. 274. (1859) 7; Conchylis anthemidana, Wky. Cat. Lp. Ins. B. M. XX VII. 236. (1863) 8; Oonchylis implicitana, Wkr. Cat. Lp. Ins. B. M. XX VII. 236. (1863) 9: XXXV. 1787. (1866) 10; Hupecilia heydeniana, Hein. Schm. Deutsch. Tortr. 83. (1868) 11; Hupe- cilia heydeniana, Mc. Ent. Ann. 1869. 90. 12; Bupecilia anthemidana, McL. partim Ent. Ann. 1869. 92—38 18; Hupecilia heydeniana, Brt. Ent. Mo. Mag. V. 245—6. (1869) 14; (?) Hupecilia subroseana, Brt. partim Ent. Mo. Mag. V. 245—6. IPG {October, (1869) 15; Conchylis implicitana, Jourdh. Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr. (4. 8.) X. 256. (1869) 16; Cochylis implicitana, Stgr. & Wk., Cat. Lp. Hur. II. 245 No. 878. (1871) 17; (?) Mill. Cat. Lp. Alp. Mar. 276. (1875) 18; (?) Hupecilia subroseana, Brt. partim Ent. Mo. Mag. XI. 194. (1875) 19; Hupeecilia heydeniana, Brt. Ent. Mo. Mag. XI. 194. (1875) 20; Hupecilia anthemidana, Brt. partim, Ent. Mo. Mag. XI. 194—5. (1875) 21; Conchylis heydeniana, Hrtm. Mitth. Minch. Ent. Ver. III. 179. No. 874. (1880) 22; Conchylis implicitana, Hrtm. Mitth. Minch. Ent. Ver. III. 179. No. 878. (1880) 28; Cochylis implicitana, Rouast Cat. Chen. Hur. 130. (1883) 24; Con- chylis heydeniana, Wism. Ent. Mo. Mag. XX VII. 2—38. (1891) 29. Larva—in fi: Anthemis cotula 2, 6, Gnaphalium 12, Pyrethrum inodorum 12, Tana-. cetum 16, Artemisia 16, Solidago virgaurea 18, Chrysocoma linosyris 23, VI 23, VII 9, VIIE 2,28, TX 23, K 16, Imago—I1V 28, V 3, V1, VII 3, VIII 3, IX 2. Hab.—GERMANY—Frankfort a.M. 1, Haimerwege 1, Hanover 1, Regensburg 3, Breslau 3, Glogau 3, Wiesen 3, Ratisbon 10, Brunswick 11. Avustrra—Vienna 11. France—Cannes 18 (?). Scortanp—Airthrey 5. HEnanuanp—Ryde 2, Ambleside 5, Charlton 6, Haslemere 14, Darenth Wood (Wlsm.), South Kensington (Wlsm.). Having regard to the confusion of names, it would perhaps be a mere waste of time to hunt through the recorded occurrences of this species; I have met with it myself on two occasions only, once on the borders of Darenth Wood, and once on some waste ground at the back of the British Museum (Natural History) in Cromwell Road. I have purposely avoided expressing any preference for the views of McLachlan or Barrett with regard to subroseana, Wilk., described from Airthrey and Ambleside; the former places it as a synonym of Heydeniana (= implicitana, Wk.), the latter associates it with czliella, Hb., the references are added to this paper with a “?,” as I have seen no Scotch specimens. 874—HEYDENIANA, HS. = ImpxLicirana (Z. MS.) Wlsm. (Wlsm.). Cochylis heydeniana HS. Schm. Hur. IV. 187. partim, Pl. lii. 369. (1849) 1; Mn. Ver. Z-B. Ver. Wien. (Abh.). V. 552. (1855) 2; Wk. in HS. Schm. Eur. VI. 157. (1856) 3; Mn. Wien. Ent. Mts. TIT. 167. (1859) 4; Coccyx heydeniana Ld. Wien. Ent. Mts. ILI. 277. (1859) 5; Conchylis heydeniana Wkr. Cat. Lp. Ins. B. M. XX VII. 236. (1863) 6; Cochylis heydeniana Stgr. & Wk. Cat. Lp. Eur. II. 245. No. 874. (1871) 7; M-P. & E-T. Nat. Sic. VIII. 154. (1889) 8; Conchylis implicitana Wlsm. Ent. Mo. Mag. XX VII. 2—3. (1891) 9. Imago—1V 1, V 1. Hab.—Itaty 1—Tuscany 3, Pisa 5. Corsi1ca—Ajaccio 2, Morreale 4. FRANCE — Cannes 9 (?). Merton Hall: July, 1893. 1893. | ‘ DO ON THE GENUS HALOBATES, ESCH., AND OTHER MARINE HEMIPTERA. BY JAMES J. WALKER, R.N., F.L.S. The genus Halobutes is one of the most remarkable and interesting forms of the Order Hemiptera, and, indeed, of all insects, both from its truly oceanic habitat (unique, so far as is known at present, among the class Insecta), and from the very curious structure and habits of the various species. Since the expedition of von Kotzebue round the world in the Russian ship “Rurick” early in the present century, when three species were described by Eschscholtz, the founder of the genus, from the examples taken by the naturalist Chamisso, these little creatures have attracted the attention and interest of nearly every observant voyager. A literature of some considerable extent has grown up respecting them, and this has been brought together in the well-known and able “ Report on the Pelagic Hemiptera” (Zoology of the Voyage of H.M.S. “ Challenger,’ part xix, 1883), by Dr. F. Buchanan White, F.L.S., to which I owe much valuable aid in the compilation of these notes. In the late surveying voyage of H.M.S. “ Penguin” in Australian and Chinese waters, I paid a good deal of attention to the habits and distribution of these insects, and I propose to give here a brief sum- mary of my observations, prefaced by those made in a former voyage to the Pacific in H.M.S. “ Kingfisher.” Crossing the tropical Atlantic in this latter vessel in 1880, I kept a good look out for the characteristic species of that ocean, H. Wiillerstorfi, Frauenf., but neither on this occasion, nor on my return voyage across the Atlantic in 1884, did I observe a single specimen of Halobates. The first time that any came under my notice was on October 6th, 1881, in the Gulf of Panama, but the ship was then steaming at six knots per hour, so I was unable to obtain them. Nor did another opportunity occur until more than a year afterwards, when we were on a voyage from San Francisco to Callao. On November 26th, 1882, we were becalmed for a short time in lat. 8° 12’ N., long. 101° 46’ W., when I saw a good many specimens on the surface of the sea, and caught six or seven from the ship’s gangway (Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. xix, p. 278). These were the widely distributed Pacific species, Hi. sericeus, Esch. On a voyage from Callao to the Marquesas Islands, in February and March, 1883, Halobates was frequently observed in the open ocean whenever the usually steady south-easterly breeze fell light for a short time. Several specimens were seen on February 27th IIS [October, in lat. 9° 35! S., long. 119° 56’ W., a position fully 1100. miles from the nearest land, the north-eastern outliers of the Paumotu or Low Archipelago, and more than twice as far from the coast of South America. These oceanic specimens, which I have unfortunately lost, were probably the widely distributed H. Wiillerstorffi, Frauent., already known from the Western Pacific Ocean. Only a very few, mostly young larve, were taken in the tow-net, the adults appearing to be well able to avoid the net in its passage through the water. In all the harbours and open roadsteads of the Marquesas Islands, a species which I refer with some reserve to H. sobrinus, White, was plentiful, especially in Omoa or Bon Repos Bay, Fatou-hiva Island ; and I saw what was probably the same species at Papiete, within the barrier-reef which encircles the Island of Tahiti. A. Wiillerstorffi was also found at the Marquesas, but much less commonly than the other. Rough weather prevented me from making further observa- tions during this cruise, and in our numerous trips along the coast of Chile and Peru, I never saw the insect at all; these southern waters, constantly cooled to below 60° F. by the Antarctic current, to a latitude far within the tropic of Capricorn, are much too cold for the continuance of the species, which evidently require a high temperature during part of the year, at least. | In the voyage of the “ Penguin,” I first saw Halobates in the Red Sea (lat. 20° 32’ N., long. 38° 1’ E.), but I had no opportunity of taking more than one or two specimens until we arrived at Perim Island, in the straits of Bab-el-Mandeb. Here a species, which is certainly not the H. Hayanus, White, recorded from Aden, but agrees well with Hl. proavus, White, from Gilolo, was found rather commonly on the sandy beaches of the Island, under seaweed and other tidal refuse, usually defunct, but often quite fresh and lively. I have a note of seeing Halobates (sp. incog.) in the Indian Ocean about 900 miles E.8:E. of Sokotra. in lat. 8° 50’ N., long. 71° 24’ HZ, but have no further record until our arrival in the Arafura Sea, off the north- western coast of Australia. A fine species, which appears to be identical with AH. regalis, Carpenter (described from Torres Straits specimens), was by no means rare in the open sea, and in the channels among the numerous small Islands. It was also frequently found on the surface of pools of salt water left by the receding tide on the coral reefs. On one of these (Guichen Reef, near Troughton Island, lat. 14° 45’ S., long. 125° 10’ E.), I found, besides the Halobates, several specimens of a species of the singular allied genus, Hermatobates, Carpenter, closely related to, though differing in many respects from, 1893. ] : 229 the H. Haddoni, Carp., recorded from Mabuiag or Murray? Island, Torres Straits. These occurred under large dead bivalve shells (Zv7- dacna), and with them I found a good sized spider of very ordinary structure and appearance, which must have been submerged, on this completely isolated reef, twice every day to a depth of ten or more feet. Another very minute apterous but fully adult Hemipteron, bearing a close superficial resemblance to the fresh-water genus Hebrus, was found not rarely at Cartier and Baudin Islands under blocks of coral on sandy beaches, very little above low-water mark. Halobates regalis was also tolerably common in the noble harbour of Port Darwin, where I took with it an undetermined species of the allied genus, Halobatodes, White. The habitat of this genus appears to be estuarine rather than oceanic, as I subsequently met with it in a similar situation in China. On the voyage from Port Darwin to Hong Kong, in November, 1891, a very fine species of Halobates was observed off the coast of Gilolo, in lat. 1° N., long. 127° E. Several specimens, including both sexes im cop., were taken from the ship’s side, and proved to be H. princeps, White, recorded from the Celebes Sea. I noted the appearance of Halobates in the China Sea on May 2nd, 1892, about 200 miles due south of Hong Kong; and in the following August, a species which appears to be identical with H. princeps was abundant among the Chusan Islands and off the adjacent coast of China in lat. 30° N. On the 18th, I went in one of our steam cutters to the head of Nimrod Sound, a long narrow arm of the sea extending inland some thirty miles, and on returning from the shore I saw a very large “school” of the insect congregated under the stern of the boat. There were quite fifty examples in the space of a square yard, and a single dip with a butterfly net served to secure half that number. Halobatodes sp. was also met with in Nimrod Sound, and on August 19th at Chin-hae, more than a mile within the mouth of the Yung River (on which the city of Ning-po stands), I observed numbers of what I took for larval Halobates, on the surface of the water within a yard of the bank. Unfortunately I neglected at the time to catch any of these, which I more than suspect now to have been Halobatodes. The habits of all the species which I have observed are very much alike. In tropical latitudes, when a sailing ship is becalmed, or a steamer is stopped for any purpose in a perfectly calm sea, it is not long before little whitish creatures are seen rapidly skimming over the glassy surface with a sinuous motion, and soon half-a-dozen or more 230 { October, Halobates are in view at once, evidently attracted by the bulky hul! of the ship, which they will approach frequently within arm’s length. Their progress appears to be effected by a sort of skating action of the long, ciliated intermediate and hind legs. When the ship is anchored in a current or tide-way, they keep abreast of her by a series of short rushes of a foot or so, against the stream, giving a speed quite suffi- cient to stem a current of two or three knots per hour. I have also noticed that they particularly like the “dead water” next the rudder under the ship’s stern, where they may often be seen when none are visible elsewhere. They show great dexterity in avoiding the net, and a quick dip is necessary to effect a capture; the tow-net was often put over astern in the “ Penguin”’ when thus anchored, but it never entrapped a single specimen. JI find in my diary for November 26th, 1882 (the first note of their capture), “They (AH sericews) were not caught without a good deal of trouble, as they were exceedingly agile, dodging the net when it came near them, and occasionally diving under it. They seemed to like the sunshine, and were much scarcer when it was overcast.” A heavy swell, provided the weather is quite calm, does not prevent their appearance, but with the ripple caused by the slightest breeze, they vanish at once; though sometimes, as at Nimrod Sound, they were to be found in plenty on the narrow belt of smooth water to leeward of the ship, when not one was to be seen on the windward side. When in the net, all the species are exceedingly active, skipping about with a very lively motion like that cf our familiar fresh-water Gerris. I have seen them leap quite a foot high from the deck, and have lost a good many through their skipping over the rim of the net into the sea. They are other- wise very helpless out of water, as besides skipping, they can only shuffle along with their thin wiry legs. I have kept the Chinese species alive for several days-in a vessel of sea water; at first they are very restless, rushing about and £ Siekeh. of Resting AtiLude of Halobates. water with the legs widely extended, and the intermediate pair brought forward so as to have the tarsi in advance of the head (as in the occasionally jumping up two or three inches from the surface, but after a few hours they become much quieter. They then rest on the 1893. ] . 231 annexed sketch, taken from a specimen of H. prineeps set in the attitude of repose). On the approach of the finger, or a pencil, they dive readily, and swim with great facility beneath the surface, the air entangled in the pubescence giving them a beautiful appearance like that of a globule of mercury or polished silver. This supply of air must be essential to the existence of the insects, which I feel sure must pass a large part of their life beneath the surface of the sea, diving into undisturbed water in rough or even moderate weather, and coming up again only when it is absolutely calm. T am not able to give any information as to the food of Halobates, further than that I have once or twice seen several specimens congre- gated round small floating objects, such as fragments of seaweed, &c., as if deriving nutriment from it. Nor do they seem to be themselves preyed upon by other marine creatures; at all events, I have seen plenty of small fish about when Halobates has been on the sea surface, but have never seen the fish “rise’’ to the insect. Their integuments are so tough and leathery that they can scarcely be very dainty morsels. The union of the sexes takes place on the surface of the sea, and the eggs are unquestionably carried about by the 9, attached to the extremity of the abdomen, for some time before she parts with them. Among my specimens from the Marquesas Islands I have found two females of H. Wiillerstorffi, one of which has three ova, and the other a single cne, thus attached. These eggs are cylindrical in shape, with rounded ends, of a deep ochreous-yellow colour, and the envelope is of very tough and firm consistence ; their size compared with that of the parent is enormous, as they are just over 1 mm. in length. Where they are eventually deposited still remains a mystery, though Prof. Uhler (Standard Natural History, vol. ii, p. 269, Boston, 1884) suggests that the insects may use Sargasswm or other floating seaweeds as a nidus. I have found young larve in the tow-net in the Central Pacific many hundreds of miles from land, but I am inclined to think that oviposition is usually effected within a much less distance of the coast ; and all my experience tends to show that the creatures are much more numerous near the land (or at any rate, more frequently observed in large numbers) than in the open ocean. Dr. Buchanan White, in his “ Report,” enumerates eleven species of Halobates as known to him, and two others have since been de- scribed, H. Whiteleggi, Skuse (Records of the Australian Museum, p- 174, plate 1), and A. regalis, Carp., both from Australian waters. Some of these appear to be very restricted in their distribution, while 932, , October, others have a very wide range over the ocean. Thus, H Wiilierstorffi appears to extend over the entire Atlantic Ocean between the parallels of 43° N. and 20° 8. latitude, sporadic examples occasionally reaching the shores of North Carolina (Uhler, J.c.), and is also widely distri- buted in the Pacific Ocean, over the northern half of which H. sericeus is also extensively spread. The former species may even be said to extend to European waters, as a specimen in the Oxford Museum is recorded as from Cape Finisterre. It is even not impossible that stray specimens may reach. the south-western shores of these Islands by means of the Gulf Stream, like Janthina, Physalia, Velella, and other organisms of warmer oceanic regions. The Chusan Islands, where I saw these insects in greater abundance than anywhere else, lie well outside the tropics, being intersected by the 30th parallel of N. latitude, and they have a winter of considerable severity, even colder than our own ; their summer, however, from June to the end of Sep- tember, is exceedingly hot, and the temperature of the surface-water of the sea surrounding them rises above 80° for a large part of this time. I have, in conclusion, to thank Mr. C. O. Waterhouse, of the Natural History Museum (where most of my specimens of Halohates are deposited), for kind assistance in identifying the species. 23, Ranelagh Road, Sheerness : August 30th, 1893. <=". ON THE HABITS OF WESOVELIA FURCATA, MULS. & REY. BY EDWARD A. BUTLER, B.A., B.Sc., F.E.S. This species of Hydrometride has so seldom occurred in this country, and so little seems to be known of its habits, that the results of a few observations on a colony I have recently met with may be of some interest to Hemipterists. The colony in question I found last August on a pond in an orchard in the hamlet of Fifield, between Maidenhead and Windsor. The pond was a long narrow one, about 120 ft. by 80; on its banks were growing Alisma, Polygonum, Lycopus, Mentha, Bidens, &c., and in the water was abundance of Potamogeton natans, together with Polygonum, Chara, and some other pond-weeds. Mesovelia was to be found on the leaves of the Potamogeton, but, in consequence of the greenish colour and extreme slenderness of the insects, it was exceedingly difficult to see them from the banks, and, in fact, I could never be quite certain that I distinguished them, and the numerous small Diptera which were also running about over the 1893. | : 933 leaves did not facilitate their discrimination. Jicrovelia pygmea, which was also present in great numbers, could be seen without any difficulty, though so much smaller. Promiscuous skimming of the surface with a water net, however, yielded a plentiful supply of the previously invisible Mesovelia. With the exception of a single winged specimen, all that I found (probably as many as 150) were undeveloped ; of the much more abundant Microvelia, I found eight developed examples. I kept a number of Mesovelie under observation in a glass jar for three weeks. When disturbed, they were extremely lively, darting about over the leaves of Potamogeton and the water with equal ease and extraordinary agility : in fact, they moved under such circum- stances far more rapidly than any other of our aquatic Hemiptera. On the water they maintain the same position as on the leaves, and their motion is in both cases an insect’s ordinary walk or run, z. ¢., the corresponding legs of the opposite sides are moved alternately, as in Hydrometra, and not simultaneously, as in Gerris The position on the water is intermediate between that of Hydrometra, in which the body is kept high above, and that of MWicrovelia or Velia, in which it is close to, the surface, and as with Hydrometra, only the tarsi are in actual contact with the water. When resting, they often assumed a frog-like position, the male especially sloping its body, with head in air, and hinder extremity almost touching the leaf on which it was standing. They often rested also on the sides of the jar, climbing up just above the water level, and remaining there, out of contact with the water, but with head turned towards it, so as to be ready on the slightest alarm to dart down to a position of greater freedom. They are carnivorous in tastes. I kept them supplied with a variety of small insects, and on different occasions saw them sucking a Smynthurus, a Crambus, a Chalcid, and, apparently most unpromising of all,a Hydrometra. The rostrum is extremely flexible, and in feeding is bent into whatever position enables the insect to reach the most easily assailable parts of its prey. Thesetz do not seem to be power- ful enough to pierce such a hard integument as covers the greater part of the body of Hydrometra, and in this case, therefore, advantage was taken of the softer skin which occurs at the junction of the coxe with the body, and the rostrum was thrust in there. One of the females, after taking a long draught of Smynthurus blood, walked to the edge of the floating leaf on which its prey was lying, dipped its rostrum into the water, and then rubbed it with its fore-legs. As it is evidently of the utmost importance that the rostral channel should be kept open and clear for the passage of liquid, I have little doubt 234 [October, that this action was undertaken for cleansing purposes, to remove congealed blood that may have oozed from the body of Smynthurus, and collected on the rostrum. Still, it is quite possible that the insect may have been drinking as well, for I have seen a Hydrometra similarly dip its rostrum into the water without having previously partaken of food, but in that ease it did not rub its rostrum on withdrawal. I should imagine that the usual food would be the small Diptera and Hymenoptera with which the leaves of the Potamogeton swarm, and that this is the reason for their selecting these leaves as their usual head-quarters. But whether they catch their prey alive, or avail themselves of the numerous drowned or partially disabled specimens that are sure to be found lying about, I cannot say, since the supplies I gave them consisted only of freshly killed insects, and the difficulty of seeing them on the pond prevented my deciding the matter by watching them in the open. Mesovelia is scrupulously cleanly in habits. The specimens I was observing, when first put into their jar, were incessantly busy cleaning themselves. Hach leg on either side rubs its next neighbour on that side ; the fore pair also clean one another in the manner with which the house-fly has made us familiar. With the fore-legs also the insect cleans its antenne and rostrum, drawing the antenne between the two tarsi, and then running the latter down the rostrum, taking great care that the tip of that instrument is thoroughly cleaned. With the second and third pairs of legs they clean the back, by rubbing the tarsi over the surface. When the above toilet had been gone through, I occasionally saw them bob down and bring the under-side in contact with the surface on which they were resting, but whether this was with a view to cleansing, or some other reason, I cannot say. I do not think Mesovelia ever voluntarily goes below the surface, and, in fact, they would probably find it a difficult matter to do so. Whena specimen was purposely submerged, it rose at once, but experienced some difficulty in getting above the surface again, on account of the fluid tension, which required a struggle to overcome, but when once up, there was no further difficulty, and it at once set to work to brush itself down with its tarsi. Hydrometra does not get so easily over a like experience. A specimen of this insect when submerged found the greatest difficulty in emerging from the water, its hair-like legs drawing out a thin film of water as it thrust them above the surface, and when it had at last got clear, and apparently escaped from the troubles of capillarity, it was unable for some hours to venture safely on the water again; each time that it attempted to do so, its tarsi 1893. , 235 eradually slid outwards, and its legs sank farther and farther, till the poor creature was left sprawling upon the surface in a perfectly help- less condition. By refraining for some hours from trusting itself to the treacherous element, it ultimately recovered its power, and was able to run about over the water as freely as before. When Meso- velia was plunged beneath the surface, a film of air could be seen clinging to its ventral surface, just as with beetles, like Hydrobius, &c. There were some Hydre in the jar, and I was interested in watching an encounter between one of these and a Wesovelia which I had sub- merged. On touching the tentacles of the polypi, the insect became at once entangled in the stinging threads, and was evidently much alarmed ; it struggled spasmodically, and with great energy, and several times freed itself only to become again entangled by further movements. At last it got clear and rose to the surface, and then a most vigorous cleaning took place, when it appeared that one of the fore-legs was paralysed. Again and again the little creature stroked the injured limb out straight, but each time it returned to the cramped position, and could not be put to the ground. The effects of the stinging, however, went off after a time, and it completely recovered the use of the limb. Pairing took place several times, and the bodies of the females became by the end of the three weeks greatly distended. J! hoped to have seen oviposition take place, but in this was disappointed, nor could I discover that any eggs had been laid on the leaves or on the sides of the jar. On leaving the neighbourhood, I attempted to bring some specimens with me, keeping them as carefully as I could in a small jar of water; but the shaking in the railway was too much for their constitution, and by the end of the journey most of them were drowned, or, at any rate, appeared to be. These I at once set ; but possibly some of them might have recovered, had I given them a chance, for I found next day that one had laid an egg on the card. The egg is a long white body, very large in proportion to the size of the insect, about 1 mm. long, 7. e., about one-fourth of the length of the entire insect. It is a slightly curved cylinder with rounded ends, and with a segment at one end of slightly smaller diameter than the rest. It would, perhaps, be unwarrantable to assume from the laying of this egg that oviposition normally takes place at the end of summer, since the process may have been accelerated by the shock of drowning. But whatever the condition of the insects during the wiuter, whether they hibernate as imagos or as larve, or whether they pass the winter in the egg condition, or whether the females only survive till the next 926 : (October, season, impregnation certainly takes place in the summer, and Meso- velta is certainly an earlier insect in attaining maturity than the rest © of the surface Hemiptera. On the same pond there were Gerris paludum, odontogaster, and argentata, Microvelia and Hydrometra, and all of these showed plenty of specimens, either actually in the larval condition, or only just transformed into imagos, and still soft, but I found only a single specimen of Mesvvelia larva, all the rest being adult, even when I first found them, at the beginning of August. 39, Ashley Road, Crouch Hill, N.: September 6th, 1893. Colias Edusa in South Devon.—C. Edusa is common here now. I saw dozens to-day, all in very good condition. I have not seen the var. Helice, nor O. Hyale.— R. Metpoua, Budleigh Salterton: August 30th, 1893. Variation of Xylophasia polyodon, &c., in Donegal.-When in Donegal last month I had some very good nights with sugar. I was much struck by the range of variation exhibited by X. polyodon, Triphena pronuba, and Apamea oculea, and, as there has been so much interest aroused of late concerning the dark forms of these and other species, I think that a note of what occurred may be interesting. The locality was a hill immediately above the sea, and sloping sharply down to the cliff and beach; the soil was limestone, the surrounding country hilly, no trees, except a few stunted willows and sallows bent by the west wind ; houses few and far between, so that smoke was practically unknown, no bogs, the people having to draw their turf seyeral miles. The dry season had reduced the rivers considerably below their usual summer level, and all surface springs were dried up. Such were the conditions. Xylophasia polyodon varied from the usual light form to a deep black and a rich warm brown, this latter being very handsome ; Triphena pronuba from 4 light drab to a deep mahogany colour that looked quite black in the lamp light, it also showed some fine red forms ; Apamea oculea exhibited some most handsome black varieties, as well as the light brown, and those with the whitish dash across the fore-wings. All these appeared together, and in fact were jostling each other to get at the sugar, or, rather, treacle; X. polyodon being very active and pugnacious, two on one occasion setting at each other like gamecocks. The dark forms were numerous, especially among X. polyodon, a fact which surprised me, as neither the locality nor the season seemed specially adapted for their production. If these facts should prove of interest to any who are working at the melanism problem, I shall feel highly rewarded.—W. F. Jonnson, Winder Terrace, Armagh: Aug. 17th, 1893, Lepidoptera in the Swansea district—The following notes of captures during a few weeks’ stay at Langland’s Bay, near Swansea, during the month of July, may prove of some interest. The hills and cliffs between the Mumbles and Langland’s Bay abounded with insect life. Satyrus Semele, in fine condition, was to be found in surprising profusion, together with S. Janira, Megera, and Tithonus. One worn 1893.] : 937 2 Colias Edusa was obtained. Much pleasure was derived from witnessing @ case of natural “assembling,” in which a splendid 9 Bombyx quercds attracted four g, all being taken together in one hole on a bank, besides other specimens. Night work was difficult on the steep cliffs, but (inter plurima alia) a very dark variation of Agrotis puta came to sugar, and one A. lucernea was attracted by light, the latter was also observed flying in bright sunshine, but the cliffs were not favourable for their capture. Triphena interjecta was also on the wing in daylight, though only one example was taken. The lovely Pyrausta purpuralis was plentiful, accompanied occasionally by the charming Ennychia cingulalis. The fine ragwort on the sand hills near Swansea produced Agrotis tritici in abundance, and A. valligera, A. ripe, and Leucania littoralis sparingly. The last named was rather worn. In this early season we were probably rather late for it. We heard of A. precox being captured, but we were not fortunate enough to meet with it. Two examples of a very pale variety of Hydrecia nictitans occurred at sugar, very distinct from those found inland. The pretty and delicately marked little Hubolia lineolata was fairly plentiful here, using the dwarf Rosa spinosissima as cover. In Sketty Park, where, by the kindness of Captain Robertson, we were invited, sugar proved most successful. Amongst many others, the following are noticeable :-—Amphipyra pyramidea, literally in crowds, sometimes twelve to twenty on a tree; Vriphena fimbria, afew; Hy- drecia micacea and H. nictitans; Cosmia trapezina, common, and C. pyralina, not many, and those worn. Captain Robertson on one evening that we were with him took a very perfect Noctua depuncta, which was new to the district. He also told me that Bombyx quercts, Agrotis lucernea, and Ennychia cingulalis had not been taken there before——A. Nasu, Standish Vicarage, Stonehouse, Gloucestershire : August, 1893. Gelechia celerella: a correction—In my note on pp. 213-4 of the current volume, I incorrectly wrote, “ Gelechia celerella, Doug.” instead of “ G. celerella, Stn.” This mistake appears in one or two printed lists, and is repeated in Mr. South’s Synonymic List (1884), which misled me. The fuller reference is G. celer- ella (Doug., MS.), Stn., Sup. Cat., p. 5 (1851); Doug., Trans. Ent. Soe. Lond., New Series, vol. i, pp. 243-4 (1852).—Eustace R. Banxxzs, The Rectory, Corfe Castle: August 31st, 1893. Chrysomela gattingensis.—Half a dozen Chrysomela gettingensis in four times that number of years is slow work, but this is about all I found, and the species seemed so much wanted that I could not keep these, so one elytron only has been in my collection for years to show what the insect was like. This half dozen I picked up one at a time at long intervals, stray things, in a road or path generally. Whenever I found one I searched well near the spot to try and learn how they were to be got; I swept and searched by night and in the sunshine, but nothing more ever came of it. The other day I was in Reading, and my friend Mr. Hamm mentioned that he had picked up some Chrysomele, and he turned them out of the bottle for me to see—they were three gettingensis. Now, three looked like business, so we went the next day and searched the ground closely, and found 28 specimens at the bottom of the grass and plants that afternoon. C. distinguenda climbs up the stems of flowers and dry grasses in the sunshine, hemoptera crawls slowly about in the daytime among the short grass on the chalk downs, lamina is best got after X 2 38. { October, dark at night by sweeping with a heavy net, hyperici hides itself among the flowers on its plant—and so on; gettingensis, however, appears to keep closer than all, and the recipe to get them seems to be—find a first specimen, and then search closely, pulling and tearing among the grass and thick stuff, in fact, hunt the ground by the inch. Every beetle was on the ground at the bottom, and a favourite place was on the ground beneath the large leaves of the mullein plants. We have now about 50 beautiful specimens from this one chalk hill—W. Hoxnanp, 21, Walton Crescent, Oxford : September, 1898. Chrysomela gattingensis.—I am able to add more localities to those already recorded in this Magazine. Of fifteen specimens in my collection four are registered as coming from Kent, and are not of my taking. The rest I picked up in a lane somewhere to the south of Barnstaple, and all in one day. But the insect is es- pecially common near Bridgenorth, in a lane known as “Stanley Lane,” leading to the Hall of that name, where a summer walk can hardly be taken without one or more specimens being noticed. I do not know why this beetle is still retained in the genus Chrysomela, as it belongs more properly to Timarcha.—T. A. MARSHALL, Botusfleming Rectory, Cornwall: July 29th, 1893. Coccinellide, &c., in East Kent.—I can confirm Mr. Champion’s note on the abundance of Coccinellide this semmer. I have observed them in great numbers in East Kent in the neighbourhood of Sittingbourne, the commonest by far being C. 7-punctata, which swarmed in the hop fields. C. 14-punctata and Chilocorus similis also occurred, besides the commoner species of lady-birds. The only other species of beetle which I noticed in the hop fields was a small Psylliodes, probably P. attenuata. ‘This insect, which was very common in places, riddles the leaves of the hops through and through, and must, I think, cause considerable loss at times to the hop farmer. I do not know whether it is generally regarded as an injurious insect. I have one specimen of Prionus coriarius from this district, it is a small male, and was taken at the end of July. It has not, I believe, been recorded before from Hast Kent.— A. J. Cuirry, 33, Queen’s Gate Gardens, S.W.: September, 18938. Niptus hololeucus.—An insect, which was formerly, I believe, looked upon as a somewhat rare species, viz., Niptus hololeucus, swarms in such profusion in a house in this town, that it will probably compel the tenants to leave it. It is almost impossible to keep it out of the food. More than 80 specimens have been destroyed in a single morning, but no efforts seem to diminish the numbers.—Puitie B. Mason, Burton-on-Trent: September, 1893. [There must be something in the house with which the insect was introduced, and if this is got rid of the beetles will probably disappear. It is exceedingly om- nivorous, but appears to delight in something piquante, cantharides, capsicums, and cayenne pepper having been included in its menu.— Eps. ]. Astynomus edilis.—I received from a friend in Hull this morning a very fine male specimen of Astynomus edilis; from its condition it seemed but just to have emerged from the pupa. It was found amongst timber just came from Norway, from which it had probably emerged.— ALFRED T'HORNLEY, South Leverton Vicarage : August, 1893. 1893. ] 239 How to make a cheap and handy chloroform bottle.—Get a “sprinkler cork,” such as is used for distributing seent—pick out one with a close grained cork ; then get a small phial into the mouth of which the sprinkler will fit tightly, if you can procure one of the strong blown glass sort, so dear to Coleopterists, so much the better, if. not, an ordinary moulded phial will answer very well, if it is protected from breakage by a turn or two of washleather or diagonally cut linen, glued or. pasted evenly round the angles of the shoulder and bottom. Having charged the bottle with the anesthetic and forced in the sprinkler, it is ready for use, which is carried out by unscrewing the top and allowing little or much of the fluid to run out as yvequired and desired. With a very little practice the outflow can be regu- lated from a small fraction of a drop to a considerable quantity—H. G. Knaaas, Camden Road, N.W.: August 9th, 1893. Obituary. | The Rev. Leonard Blomefield (formerly Jenyns), M.A., F.L.S., Fe., died at Bath on September Ist, in his 94th year. He has been styled the “ Father” of the Linnean Society, which he joined in 1822; the same title might have been conferred on him as regards the Zoological Society (1826), and the Entomological (1833), of both of which he was an original Member. Indeed, it is doubtful if there be any living Naturalist who has reached so patriarchal an age. His father was the Rev. G. L. Jenyns, a Canon of Ely, and his son Leonard was born in London on May 25th, 1800. His later education was obtained at Eton, and he passed thence to Ste John’s Coilege, Cambridge. He was ordained at the age of 23 to the Curacy of Swaffham Bulbeck, in Cambridgeshire, and subsequently became vicar of the parish for 30 years. Thence he removed to the Isle of Wight, afterwards to Bath, where he died. He abandoned the name of Jenyns many years ago, but it is under that name that he was best known as a Naturalist. He retained his faculties to the last, and even his handwriting was as firm and clear as ever. Jenyns (Blomefield) was essentially a Field Naturalist, and all his best work was done before he attained the age of 40; undoubtedly the chief of his productions was the “ Manual of British Vertebrate Animals,” published at Cambridge, in 1836. We leave to general Zoologists the duty of writing an extended memoir of him. As an Entomologist he published two papers which have attracted attention. The first was: “ On three undescribed species of Cimes, allied to the Bed-bug” (Annals of Nat. Hist., 1839), and the other on a Dipterous larva discharged in large numbers from the human intestines (Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., 1839). The first of these related to the species of Cimew attached respectively to pigeons, swallows, and bats, and his attention was, no doubt, drawn to them during his investigations of the British Vertebrates. His powers of observation were so keen as to cause one to regret that he published so little latterly. He founded the Bath Natural History Field Club in 1855, and took a warm interest in the Bath Literary and Scientific Institution, to which he presented his library and herbarium about the year 1869. His earlier collections were given to the Cambridge Philosophical Society. In 1887 he published (privately) : “ Chapters in my Life” (second edition in 1889), which are amusing and instruc- tive reading, on account of the reminiscences of the early days of contemporary Naturalists, and in which we learn that the post of Naturalist to the “ Beagle,” accepted by Darwin, was offered to the subject of this notice, but declined. . X 2 IAQ {October, Arthur Claypon Horner, M.R.C.S., F.E.S8., died suddenly from aneurism of the aorta, at Tonbridge, where he had been long settled, and where he held impor- tant medical appointments, on August 3rd. He was the youngest son of the late Rev. Joseph Horner, of Everton, Bedfordshire. We are unacquainted with his exact age, but he was in the prime of life, and will be greatly missed amongst the not too numerous band of students of British Coleoptera, who numbered him amongst the most diligent and successful of their colleagues, and there are those amongst them who have to deplore the loss of a warm friend. He was educated professionally at St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, and was admitted M.R.C.S. in 1872; but prior to that he held the appointment of Assistant Surgeon to the 5th French Ambulance Corps, in the Franco-Prussian war ; in 1875—76 he was surgeon to the “ Pandora ”’ during the arctic voyage undertaken by that vessel, in connection with which he published some notes on Arctic Natural History. It was not until 1886 that he joined the Entomological Society of London, but long previous to that he had made a name amongst British Coleopterists. Societies. LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIRE EnromotoaicaL Socitnty: September 11th, 1893. —Mr. W. E. Suarp, Vice-President, in the Chair. Mr. G. Morel-Deville read a paper, entitled, “ A Fortnight’s Entomology in the Canary Islands,’ in which he described the difficulties of collecting specimens in Canary, owing to the intense heat, the large Cactus, and the laval nature of the ground. He then recounted the species taken, the majority of which occurred in Great Britain, and gave a graphic description of the capital and general features of the country. The paper was illustrated by numerous photographs and specimens. The Chairman exhibited a number of Coleoptera from Worcester and Delamere; Mr. Harker, Lepidoptera from Missouri and Kentucky; Mr. Watson, the female of Papilio Phorcas, which he stated was apparently very rare, although the male was commonly received from Africa; Mr. Newstead, nests or cells of Crabro chrysostoma and Pemphredon lugubris, the former stored with a species of Syrphus, and the latter with an Aphis, Melanoxanthus salicis, Lin., common on willow, to be used as food, and Cassida viridis, taken on new land formed by the Manchester Ship Canal at Ince, Cheshire.—F. N. Prurcn, Hon. Sec.,7, The Elms, Dingle, Liverpool. THE Sour Lonpon EnromonoeicaL anp Naturat History Socrery: September 14th, 1893.—J. JenNER WetR, Esq., F.L.S., President, in the Chair. Mr. Auld exhibited living larve of Phorodesma smaragdaria, Fb., also two breeding cages for larv, as described in the Ent. Mo. Mag. for July last, by Dr. H. G. Knaggs. Mr. South showed a fine series of Spilosoma lubricepeda, vars. zatima, Cr., and radiata, St., a splendid var. of Argynnis Euphrosyne, l., taken in Lan- cashire, a pale var. of Vanessa urtice, L., from Monmouthshire, a bluish specimen of Procris statices, L., and a number of Zygena trifolii, Esp., including almost all the known forms. Mr. Tutt mentioned that out of about 200 specimens of this insect taken in North Kent last year, five only were absolutely typical, the remainder having a tendency to assume a six-spotted form, similar to Z. filipendule. Mr. Weir 1893.] ; 241 said these two species occasionally cross in a state of nature. Mr. Fenn exhibited long series of Spilosoma lubricepeda, var. radiata, St., bred from ova received from Mr. Tugwell, Gnophos obscurata, Hb., from Folkestone, and Macaria notata, L., bred from ova, also Selenia lunaria, Schiff., and read a note thereon. Mr. R. Adkin . exhibited a series of Thecla betule, L., and read a note with reference to the order of sexual emergence ; he also showed a short series of Pygera pigra, Hufn. (reclusa, Fb.), bred from larvee taken in Sutherlandshire last autumn. Mr. Jenner Weir read , a note in which he stated that in a recent tour in Belgium, he had seen no Colias Hyale, ., and but one C. Edusa, Fb. He also stated how exceedingly abundant the third brood of Polyommatus Phieas, L., had been in his garden at Beckenham this month. Mr. Tutt gave his experience of a day amongst the Lepidoptera in the suburbs of Paris at the beginning of August, when Colias Hyale, L., was in numbers. Mr. Enock exhibited wheat stems containing pups of the Hessian fly from Sidmouth, where he found it infesting the wheat and barley, also examples of Chlorops teniopus, the destructive ribbon-footed corn fly—H. Wiuutams, Hon. Secretary. ON SOME MEMBERS OF THE INSTABILELLA GROUP OF THE GENUS LITA (G@ELECHLA, partim), WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF LZ. SUEDELLA, n. sp. AND L. INSTABILELLA, DOUGLAS. BY NELSON M. RICHARDSON, BA., F.E.S. Some time ago I was asked by Mr. C. G. Barrett to describe the Lita bred from Sueda, a series of which he had seen in my collection. T then thought it better to defer doing so ; but, with the concurrence of Mr. Atmore, who has brought the subject under public notice (ante p. 45), and who appears to have made the earliest recorded captures of the insect (with the exception of Mr. Hodgkinson), I now venture on the task. It will be unuecessary for me to enter upon the historical part of the subject, or to mention the various entomologists who have successively discovered this species, as that is being fully dealt with in a paper by my friend, Mr. E. R. Bankes, who will give the synonymy of the species contained in this group. I therefore proceed immediately to the description of the species which is bred from Sueda fruticosa and 8. maritima, for which I propose the name suedella. Lita SU®DELLA, 2. sp. I take as a type the most ordinary form. Exp. alar., 6’’—7’”, very rarely less than 63’’. Fore-wings with the costa slightly but regularly curved, the inner margin nearly straight after the inner basal: angle ; hind margin of fringe nearly straight, of denuded wing slightly concave. bled with darker and lighter f . shades of the same colour, and with slate coloured or dark greyish-ochreous scales, Ground-colour of fore-wings ochreous, much ma which distribute themselves more or less regularly in single rows along the veins ; IAD { October, these are generally most traceable towards the apex of the wing, and between the extremities of each pair of veins is situated a small blackish spot. These spots are larger as they approach the apex. An ochreous line lies in the subcostal fold from the base. The most striking feature is a broad inner marginal band of bright pale ochreous, occupying nearly one-third of the breadth of the wing, which becomes less distinct before it reaches the anal angle; into this project four blackish spots, which lie in a line on or close to the inner fold at about equal distances from each other, the last being near the middle of the wing; the first two often form a streak; opposite to these first two are two similar costal spots, which can sometimes be traced onwards as short streaks pointing towards the anal angle; there is one blackish double spot just before, and another double spot just behind, the end of the discoidal cell ; a blackish streak starts from near this latter spot and runs to near the tip ; the discoidal cell is sometimes much covered with dark greyish scales; fringes pale greyish-ochreous, with traces of darker transverse lines. There is no pale hind marginal fascia. Hind-wings pale fuscous ; veins darker, fringes pale greyish-ochreous with pale ochreous bases. Head and thorax bright pale ochreous; patagia darker, marbled like fore-wing ; abdomen like hind-wing, tip pale ochreous, base often somewhat yellowish, but this is not constant in dried specimens. Antenne .fuscous, with in- distinct pale ochreous rings; palpi pale ochreous, the last joint with a ring at base and the tip fuscous; legs pale ochreous, with fuscous markings externally, and the tarsi ringed with fuscous below the joints. : This species varies considerably, but can generally be recognised most easily by the bright pale ochreous colour of its inner margin. This marking is not, however, always distinct, and I have specimens which are almost destitute of any markings on the pale ochreous ground-colour, with the exception of the slate coloured scales on the veins, and a certain amount of almost rusty mottling, the black spots and the pale inner margin being absent. Even then the ground-colour gives a clue to the species; but such specimens are rare. Lita suedella is nearly allied to L. plantaginella and L. ocellatella, well known species, and to L. instabilella, bred from Atriplex portula- coides. Of these, plantaginella is much the nearest, and I will therefore consider it first, and mention the points in which it differs from swedella, In size it is very variable, viz., 53/” to over 7’, but the fore-wings are strikingly narrower than in swedella. Vo show the difference, | have measured 14 consecutive specimens in each series in my cabinet, and find that the breadth of the fore-wing (measured for accuracy with a microscope and micrometer) being taken as 1, the average full expanse of fore-wings in 14 swedella is 9.20, and in 14 plantaginella is 10.35 ; so that the average fore-wing of swedella is no less than one-eighth broader than that of plantaginella. I also find that the scales are more closely packed sideways on plantaginella, which gives it a somewhat smoother appearance than swedella, but this is not striking. The bright ochreous colour of swedella is everywhere replaced in plantagi- 1893.] i 243 nella by a greyer shade of brown, which makes it a duller and generally darker insect, but even in the lighter forms it never has the same bright ochreous tint. There is sometimes a tendency to a greyish- ochreous inner margin, and a central blackish streak often runs from bask to apex. The larve and modes of life are also very different, as will be seen later on. : Lita OCELLATELLA, Stn. This is the prettiest species of this little group, and the only one that shares with swedella the bright pale ochreous colour, which is often the general ground- colour, but is sometimes replaced by a creamy pink, or rarely bright pink,* and is also often so suffused with blackish scales that very little of the ground-colour is seen. The black spots (which have the same general arrangement as in swedella) are small and distinct, and often surrounded by a few scales of the ground-colour without any dark ones, which gives them the ocellated appearance whence the moth derives its name, but the distinguishing feature of the species is a broad pale trans- verse band of the ground-colour towards the apex. This is the smallest of the group, and rarely exceeds 6”, whilst it is sometimes only 5”’ in expanse of wings. By a strange coincidence the larva also exceeds its allies in beauty. This species is, L think, too distinct and well known to require further attention, the larva and food-plant being also distinct from those of its allies. There are two other species to which I wish to refer, one of which is that bred from Atriplex portulacoides, to which the name instabilella, Degl., appears rightly to belong; the other from Salicornia herbacea, etc., named salicornie by Hering. I take this opportunity of acknow- ledging gratefully my indebtedness to Mr. W. H. B. Fletcher for much valuable information concerning these species. Lira INSTABILELLA, Del. I take a specimen of one of the most ordinary forms, and not the streaked var. figured by Douglas (Zool., 1270, fig. 10), which is certainly rare in this neighbour- hood, and also I believe elsewhere, and does not at all represent the usual forms of this insect. Exp. alar., 6”’—7””, most usual size 63’”. Costa straighter than in suedella, and tip of wing blunter. Fore-wings rather pale fuscous, with a slightly irrorated appearance, arising from the fact that the scales are mostly pale at their bases, with a fuscous blotch close to the toothed tip; blackish spots arranged as in suedella; the usual pale fascia near the hind-margin very pale greyish-ochreous, angulated, distinct ; fringes greyish-ochreous with fuscous transverse lines. Hind-wings pale fuscous ; fringes paler, with greyish-ochreous bases. Thorax and peer i like fore- FEB ; head rather paler; antenne fuscous, with a trace * A figure of the pink var. is given in Proc. Dorset Nat. Hist. and al late, Field Club, vol. xii, p. 161, plate V, 1890-91. 244 : [October, of lighter rings; palpi and legs greyish-ochreous, the last joint of palpi with the tip and a ring at base fuscous, and legs with fuscous markings externally and the tarsi ringed with fuscous below the joints ; abdomen pale fuscous, with greyish- ochreous tip. In the streaked var. the blackish spots are more or less obscured by a longitu- dinal blotch of similar colour, which runs from the base to the end of the discoidal cell, and is thence continued as a very narrow blackish line to the tip. There is also frequently more or less grey shading over the whole fore-wing, but the pale fascia is still distinct. The hind-wings are also rather black. This species varies much, but may be known from swedella by its want of the bright pale ochreous inner margin and other parts, and especially by the presence of a pale fascia. The blackish spots are not generally all present, and are often partially or wholly replaced by rusty-brown spots; in fact, I always associate this species with the brownish colour, which sometimes pervades the whole wing. This replacement of black scales by brown ones is more or less characteristic of several species of this group, but is much the most strikingly de- veloped in instabilella and salicornie. Sometimes the wing is marbled here and there with whitish scales, and ochreous scales are also some- times present, especially along the subcostal and inner folds, but the slaty scales marking out the veins, though occasionally partially traceable, are not distinct as in swedella. The whole appearance is duller, and more greyish than ochreous, and, except in extreme cases, where all markings are more or less obsolete, there is no difficulty in separating specimens of these two species. LARV i. The following is a description of the larva of L. suedella, taken May 29th, 1889 :— Length, about 5”. Rather stout, tapering a little in the first two and last two segments. Head rather flat, and about half the width of body. Head, prothoracic and anal plates and legs, shining black. Ground-colour of body very light olive-green; 3rd and 4th’ segments darker than the rest, sometimes strikingly so, the back a little lighter, more inclining to glaucous than the under-side; the last two or three segments sometimes tinged with - yellow. The dorsal line (straight and of regular width), subdorsal line (which is made up of a short, thick, longitudinal line on the front of each segment, joined to a similar thinner line just below on the hinder half of the segment), and wavy spi- racular line, and the usual warts, are reddish-chocolate and distinct. The warts are darker than the lines, and placed in a small patch of the ground-colour. The larva is moderately active. It spins a silken tube along a shoot of Sweda, near to or against the stalk amongst the fleshy leaves, which it eats partially through as it proceeds, generally choosing a 1893. | a 245 position near the tip of the shoot, but sometimes on the main stem, when it fastens the leaves of the shoot down with its silken gallery. Occasionally it joins two shoots together near their tips. It does not appear to leave its first gallery until it wishes to pupate, when it retires from it to seek a convenient spot, spinning a slight cocoon. In con- finement it descends into the earth to spin up, and Mr. Harwood writes me of his second expedition after the larve—‘ I was too late for larve, but found the cocoons in plenty in the sand under the food-plants.”” The larva is often abundant on Sueda fruticosa in May, being full-fed towards the end of the month. There is no trace of any larve in the Sweda at the time when those of Lita instabilella are feeding, so that the egg does not appear to hatch until the end of April. Though the brood which pupates in May and emerges in the first half of July is so abundant, I have had but little experience of a second brood. I found larve in some numbers feeding on S. maritima on August 31st, 1889 (I should mention that 8. maritima, which is an annual, is hardly visible in May, and therefore not then available as food), but the second brood seems very uncertain, and I have only seen it on one other occasion, viz., in 1892, when I found but one larva on S. maritima. I unfortunately mislaid the box containing the pupated larve of August, 1889, and did not again find it until May, 1890, when the moths were all out and dead, so that I cannot tell whether the emergence took place in the autumn or early spring. Larva of Lita plantaginella :— Body with the nine middle segments of uniform width, tapering more at the tail than at the head. Head polished, brown ; prothoracic plate polished, black, divided by dorsal line of ground-colour; legs black ; anal plate of ground colour, slightly polished, incon- spicuous. Ground-colour dirty yellowish, sometimes with a greenish tinge, and sometimes slightly tinged with pink, not polished. ‘There are often faint dull pink markings, viz., dorsal line, subdorsal line composed of an irregular double longitudinal mark on each segment, and a somewhat wavy line below the spiracles. These markings are sometimes quite obsolete, and generally less distinct towards the head. Warts polished, black, and very small, except the subdorsal ones on 13th segment. Bristles almost transparent. Spiracles, when magnified, distinctly outlined with black. I have found this larva on Plantago lanceolata, but P. coronopus seems here to be its favourite food-plant. It also feeds (Ent. Mo. Mag., xv, 89) on P. maritima, but I have not found it on this plant. — The egg is doubtless laid near the middle of a shoot, and the larva burrows in the root to the depth of nearly half an inch, feeding Y & 246 (October, on its substance. In doing this it bites through the stalks of some of the central leaves and flowers, but these dead parts are soon covered by the growth of the outer leaves, and the presence of the larva is only betrayed by a small heap of light brown frass (which soon darkens in colour) near the middle of the plant, the middle being occupied by a dense mass of hoary fibres, which, with the aid of a little silk to hold all together, conceal and protect the entrance to the burrow. The larva generally, if not always, pupates in its burrow, and turns to a yellowish pupa, which soon becomes brown in colour. The moth varies considerably in size, probably according te the growth of the food-plant, which is greatly affected by a dry or wet situation. It (P. coronopus) will grow in a very dry and hot spot, but in this case is so very small that there is but little food for the larva, but in damp situations it attains a large size. There are two regular broods of this species ; the larve of the first feeding in May and the moths emerging in the latter half of June, the second brood feeding in July and August and emerging in September. It will be seen that this larva differs from swedella in its brown head and anal plate of the ground-colour, both of which in suedella are black; in the ground-colour; in the markings, which are much fainter and often absent; in the size and colour of the warts, which are small and black, whereas they are distinct and reddish-chocolate in suedella ; it also spins up in its burrow, which swedella does not. Larva of ZL. ocellatella :— Length, about 3”. Body of uniform width, tapering in the first two and last two segments to about half. Head somewhat flattened. The usual warts are hardly raised above the surface, and the body is slightly indented between the segments. Legs short. Head pale brown, with the jaws and margins a little darker; prothoracie and anal plates very pale brown, the former with pale dorsal line ‘and some large and small black spots on its margins, the latter margined with dark brown, and with a few small black spots in front. The general appearance is of a pale, rather trans- parent, yellowish-green larva, with a bright crimson ring on each segment. Hach ring is made up of a series of irregularly shaped crimson blotches, forming portions of the broad interrupted dorsal, subdorsal and spiracular lines, and a narrow lower line, which is not always visible. Warts inconspicuous, blackish, in a patch of the ground-colour, with almost colourless bristles. Spiracles very inconspicuous, with brown edges ; legs greyish ; testes sometimes but not always distinctly marked by a grey spot on the 9th segment. Under the microscope the red patches are seen to consist of a number of small red-edged figures of irregularly circular outline, and close together. The red colour is often very bright, but varies in intensity, especially in the front segments. 1893 | ( | 247 The larva has two modes of feeding. Hither it burrows amongst the buds, spinning as it goes, and causing more or less deformity of the flower-spike, which, together with the small spun-up heaps of frass, betray its presence, or it mines into a leaf. In this case, unless the leaf be a very small one, it is generally so thick and fleshy, that, although the larva tunnels backwards and forwards in its substance, there is very little sign of its work apparent on the surface ; and one is often surprised, on breaking open a leaf, to find how much it has been hollewed out. It quits its mine when full-fed, and in captivity pupates in the earth in a slight cocoon or amongst rubbish. ‘The first brood feeds in May, being full-fed towards the end of the month, and emerges at the end of June; the second brood feeds in the latter part of June and July, and emerges in August, but is rather more uncertain than the first in its time of feeding and emergence, though the first emergence is occasionally retarded (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxvii, 48). Mr. Barrett has described this larva (Ent. Mo. Mag., xvi, 261), so I hope he will excuse my giving further particulars, which I do for the sake of comparison. Mr. Threlfall records Aster ¢ripolium as a food-plant of this species (Ent. Mo. Mag., xv, 89). Larva of Lita ixstabilella :— Length, about 4”. Body of uniform width, tapering in the two segments at each end. Head rather flattened, about half the width of the middle segment. Head, prothoracic and anal plates slightly darker than the ground-colour, polished, with the jaws, palpi, and posterior and lateral margins of head and pro- thoracic plate, blackish; prothoracic plate with a pale dorsal line, and the anterior margin whitish. Ground-colour pale dirty yellowish-green; 3rd and 4th segments sometimes rather brighter. Markings dull brownish-red, viz., a dorsal line, subdorsal line (which is sometimes more or less double, the lower part sending a branch downwards at each extremity of each segment, sometimes merely an irregular broad line), and a faint spiracular line, all eccasionally obsolete on segments 3 and 4. Usual warts small and blackish, but as a rule not striking to the naked eye. Spiracles incon- spicuous, outlined with blackish. Legs blackish. Bristles very inconspicuous, of the ground-colour. The larva mines a leaf of Atriplex portulacoides, completely eating out the fleshy inside in patches, making the leaf appear whitish-green, and whitish when dryer. It also spins up to a slight extent the shoot ~ on which the leaf is placed, and generally attacks two or three leaves on the same shoot in succession. It makes a small round hole in the skin of the leaf, and through it ejects all its excrement, so that its 248 [October, 1893. mine is always quite clean. It appears to feed solely on this plant in the early spring, the only other with fleshy leaves which was growing © near, in the middle of April, being S. fruticosa, on which there was then no trace of any larve. Beta and other plants were just shooting, and others, such as Sueda maritima, Salicornia, &c., not yet visible, The larva is rather sluggish. It hangs by a thread when dis- turbed, if out of its mine, as I have occasionally seen it, when engaged i spinning up the shoot, and has sometimes a curious way of stretching out its first few segments to a remarkable length and thinness. The larve pupate in captivity in a slight cocoon in earth and the moths emerge in the latter half of June. I am not aware that any second brood of this species has been detected. It is interesting to note that many individuals of ZL. instabilella, as well as some others of this group, must pass portions of their life in their first three stages under water, as they occur on plants which are regularly covered at high tide, a phase of life which they share with several of the genus Coleophora. The moths must carefully choose their time for emerging, and also for egg laying, which cannot take place when the tide is high. The larve are also exposed to attacks by sea and land foes. All the above species oecur in this neighbourhood, as well as L. salicornia. Major Hering has most kindly sent me specimens of some species of this group which have not been found with us. JZ. halymella, Mill., and salinella, Z., two sandy-coloured species, which seem to be very closely allied to each other; L. tusstlaginella, Hein., bred from larvee mining the leaves of Tussilago farfara, a small, narrow winged, pale wainscot-coloured moth with brownish-ochreous veins and three blackish spots; and a form which is bred in the South of France from Sueda fruticosa, but which, in my opinion, is distinct from any of our British species, and quite different from any swedella that I have ever seen. My specimen has the fore-wing rather dark greyish-brown, somewhat mottled with paler brown, two blackish costal spots near the base and a few at the tip, and traces of some of the others usual in this group. It would, however, require a long series in order to be able to speak definitely about it. It is possible that some of our species may change gradually in appearance as we go southwards, but much investigation will be required before we can know the relations of the Mediterranean species to our own. Montevideo, near Weymouth : September Ath, 1898. November, 1893. | ; 249 NOTES ON NEUROPTERA. BY KENNETH J. MORTON, F.E.S. Agapetus delicatulus, McL., in Arran.—One g and two ¢ of an Agapetus taken last July in Arran appear certainly to belong to this species. This is an interesting addition to the known distribution of A. delicatulus, which, a8 British, has only been recorded from the Killarney region, where it has been taken by Mr. King and myself. On the continent it has been found in the Pyrenees. Drepanopteryx phalenoides, L., at Cleghorn.—Another example of D. phalenoides was beaten from Corylus on August 7th last. Single examples have now been taken in the locality annually for two or three years, but it stiil defies all efforts to make it common, the present specimen being the result of quite two hours’ work in its known haunts. Distance keeps me from visiting Cleghorn in the evening, when D. phalenoides is known to fly, and when it might possibly be taken more freely. Micropterous forms of Teniopteryx.—Amonegst a very great num- ber of Perlide collected during the present year perhaps the most remarkable are two micropterous ¢ of Teniopteryx nebulosa, L., found under stones by the river Mouse, near Cleghorn, in the early days of March. Albarda says (Annales de la Soc. Ent. de Belgique, Tome XXxili) with regard to this form, “La forme microptéere du mile est trés rare dans les collections. Sauf celle de Rambur, je n’en ai vu que deux, prises en Heosse par M. King.” Mr. King has informed me that Albarda’s remarks are ae quite correct as regards the origin of the Scotch examples. These were taken by me many years ago on the Clyde about the end of February, and until the present season I have never been able to re-find the form, which (with the exception of Rambur’s type of WV. minuta alluded to) remains unknown, save from Clydesdale. It will be observed that these newer examples were taken on a tributary of the Clyde, while the older ones came from the main stream. The latter provided this season instead an almost equally interesting micropterous form of T. trifasciata, Pictet. The apparent rarity of these forms is no doubt due to the time of their appearance, almost in winter, when they must be carefully sought for by stone- turning, as they rarely ascend the still bare boughs of the bushes erowing along the margins of the streams, from which the winged 9 may sometimes be beaten. Carluke, N.B.: October, 1893. 250 [No vember, ON BEMBIDIUM IRICOLOR, BEDEL: A NEW BRITISH SPECIES. BY E. A. NEWBERY. Bembidium tricolor, Bedel, was first described in 1879 (Fn. Col. Seine, i, p. 35), and is a near ally of B. biguttatum, F., and riparium, Ol. Though well known to British Coleopterists, it has not hitherto been included in our catalogues. The following table will serve to distinguish the three species :— A.—Elytra with the 7th stria indicated by a row of seven or eight punctures . B. biguttatum, F. B.—Elytra with the 7th stria wanting. I.—Middle joints of antenne about 3 times as long as broad ; interstices of elytra broader and flatter. 4—5 mm... .........B. iricolor, Bedel. II.—Middle joints of antenns at most 23 times as long as broad; inter- stices of elytra narrower and more convex. 3} mm.... B. lunulatum, Foure. = riparium, Ol., et Auct. Bembidium biguttatum usually has the first joint of the antenne and the legs of a clearer red than in its allies; the general colour is greener, and in size it is intermediate between them; it is common, but less so than B. lunulatum, Foure. B. tricolor is the insect described as riparium in Canon Fowler’s “British Coleoptera ;” it is much larger than its allies, and appears to be restricted to the margins of brackish water. JI have seen specimens from Rainham, Plumstead, Plaistow, Sheerness, and Southsea. B. lunulatum, Foure. (1785), = riparium, Ol., and is the var. riparium of Cox’s “Handbook.” As riparium has been used for both this species and iricolor, Bedel, it is perhaps best to drop the name riparium altogether. This is the smallest and darkest of the three species, and is very abundant. I am indebted to Bedel’s “Coléoptéres du bassin de la Seine” for the antennal character in the above table, the other characters given by him do not appear to me to be so marked as the difference in the interstices of the elytra. 12, Churchill Road, Dartmouth Park, London, N.W.: October 16th, 1898. [In my book I have allowed B. riparium (? = lunulatum, Fourc.) to stand as a separate species, on the ground of the total absence of the 7th stria of the elytra, but I felt considerable doubt in the matter, and believe it to be only a form of B. biguttatum. As for B. tricolor, 1893.2 951 the characters assigned to it by Bedel are certainly not enough to give it specific rank ; they are purely comparative and very slight, and at most the insect appears to be a local variety, found, as above stated near brackish water ; forms found in such localities are often some- what different from the type. It isa pity, too, to further confuse the nomenclature, and, in any case, to revive B. lunulatum is to cause a confusion with B. lunatwm, that is far best avoided if possible; several of the groups of Bembidium are quite confused enough already.— ON THE OVIPOSITION OF NONAGRIA LUTOSA. BY J. GARDNER, F.E.S. In the autumn of 1881, whilst collecting this species, I was for- tunate in discovering a female depositing her eggs on a withered leaf of the common reed; the peculiar and interesting method of conceal- ing them was, however, not recorded at the time, and not until the night of 30th September last had I an opportunity of confirming my observations, when I was again fortunate in finding a female engaged in ovipositing, but on this occasion both the female and the leaf upon which the eggs were laid were secured. The insect selects a withered leaf of the reed, on the under-side of which it rests, curling its ovipositor over to the surface of the leaf, near to the edge of which an egg is laid, the edge is then carefully turned over it and firmly glued down, after which egg after egg is deposited, and the same process repeated until a long roll, very little wider than the diameter of the egg, is formed, and which looks exactly like the curling up of the grass as it dries up in the ordinary course of nature, and it will be a sharp eye that can detect anything denoting the treasure which the insect has so carefully hidden; the gummy matter which is used is exceedingly tenacious, the fold being very difficult to open. Should the insect select a narrow leaf of the reed, which the specimen I observed on the 30th September this year had done, it commences to deposit near the small end of the leaf, folding both edges over. No doubt the great care exercised in secreting the eggs is a natural instinct to protect them from the many predaceous insects so common on the banks of streams. Hartlepool: October 3rd, 1898. 252 [November, SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ON HALOBATES, &c. BY J. J. WALKER, R.N., F.L.S. I am much indebted to Dr. HE. Bergroth, of Tammerfors, Finland, and to Mr. G. H. Carpenter, of the Science and Art Museum, Dublin, for kindly calling my attention to three recently described species of Halobates, which I had omitted to notice in my paper on this genus — (ante pp. 227 et seq.). These are— | 1.—4. splendens, Witlaczil, “ Wien, Ent. Zeit.,” 1886, p. 178, fig. 1, and “Zoologischer Anzeiger,’ 1887, pp. 83836—9. Habitat, Eastern Pacific Ocean, south of the Galapagos Islands. 2.—H. ineanus, Witl., “ Wien, Ent. Zeit.,” 1886, p. 179, fig. 2, and “Zool. Anzeiger,” 1887, pp.836—9. Habitat, Indian Ocean (Arabian Sea, N. E. and 8. EH. of the Island of Sokdtra). 3.—H. inermis, Dahl, “ Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung,” 1893, vol. ii, G, a, x. (Die Halobatiden der Plankton-Expedition, von Dr. F. Dahl, 1893, p. 6, figs. 7 and 8). Habitat, Tropical Atlantic Ocean, lat. 10° N., long. 22° W. The first two were obtained during the scientific voyage round the world of the Italian corvette “ Vettor Pisani,” and the third was found by the recent “ Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung,”’ for the investigation of the surface-fauna of the Atlantic Ocean. In “Zool. Anzeiger,” vol. x, p. 888 (1887), Dr. Witlaczil records the following very interesting observation respecting the oviposition of Halobates: —“ By the ‘Pisani’ a bird’s feather was picked up at sea quite covered with eges, which it was determined belonged to Halobates. Unfortunately, the same were in the last stage of de- velopment, so that they were of no use to me for the embryology of the animals.” Fr. Meinert (Slaegten Metrocoris, Mayr, og dens “ forma prema- tura”’ Halobatodes, White, in “ Entomologiske Meddelelser,’ Kjében- havn, Bd. i, p. 140, 1887) discusses the relations of the two genera, and regards Halobatodes as an immature form of Jetrocoris. | 23, Ranelagh Road, Sheerness : October 20th, 1893. A NEW MIMETIC GENUS OF LYGAIDZ. BY DR. O. M. REUTER. PROSTEMMIDEA, zov. gen. Corpus oblongum. Caput usque ad oculos immergendum, totum verticale, a latere visum longitudine triplo altius, ab antico visum parte apicali pronoti angustius, 1893. | i 953 latitudini cum oculis geqtie longum. Oculi parvuli, breviusculi, ultra angulos anticos pronoti prominentes. Rostrum apicem mesostethii attingens, articulo primo caput superante, sed impressionem transversalem prostethii haud attingente, tertio secundo distincte breviore et quarto fere eque longo. Antenne longe infra apicem oculornm inserte, ab oculis fere seque longe ac ab apice clypei remote, articulo primo eodem articulo rostri breviore, secundo latitudine capitis breviore, tertio secundo adhuc breviore, quarto secundo longiore. Pronotum latitudini posticse eque longum, pone medium disco fortiter transversim impressum ibique lateribus fortiter sinuatis, his versus apicem parallelis, ante apicem fere subito valde rotundatis, angulis ipsis anticis acutiusculis, deflexis, marginibus carinatis, lobo antico convexo postico multo longiore, hoe discolore. Scutellum longius quam latius, commissura clavi saltem quadruplo longius. Clavus triseriatim punctatus. Sutura ventralis tertia utrinque distincte antrorsum curvata. Pedes breviusculi. Femora antica incrassata, inferne versus apicem denticulis pluribus, ante quartam apicalem partem spina magna leviter curvata armata. Tibiw inferne spinulose. ‘Tarsi postici articulo primo duobus reliquis simul sumtis vix dimidio longiore. Allied to Rhyparochromus, Curt., but differing by the discolorous posterior lobe of the pronotum, the vertical head, and the structure of the rostrum, &c. In colour and markings this, the only known species, reminds one much of some species of the genus Prostemma (Nabide). P. MIMICA, 7. sp. Nigra, nitidula; inferne cinereo-sericea, ventre nitido longe setoso; superne longe fusco-setosa ; pronoti lobo postico scutelloque rufo-ferrugineis, illo angulis posticis infuscatis, hoc basi nigro ; hemielytris opacis, albido-testaceis, fusco-puncta- tis, imo basi clayi, macula corii in tertia basali parte posita parteque ejus dimidio apicali nigris, hac parte nigra dimidio antico opacissima, dimidio postico nitidissima, punctata, breviter pilosula ; membrana opaca nigra, macula rotundata anguli basalis aliaque transversali apicem occupante niveis; antennis, rostro pedibusque cum coxis testaceis, pilosis, femoribus apice tibiisque anticis, apice excepto, infuscatis ; femoribus anticis ante spinam denticulis quinque armatis, intimo ante medium sito; capite dense subtilius punctulato ; pronoti lobo postico quam antico fortius punctato. Long., 9, 5 mm. Patria; Bombay, India. Communicavit D. Dr. E. Bergroth. Helsingfors: September 11th, 1898. ON TRACHYSCELIS, with DESCRIPTIONS or THREE NEW SPECIES. BY G. C. CHAMPION, F.Z.S. The genus Trachyscelis, the typical species of which is a well- known South European insect, once reputed British, is very widely distributed, but up to the present time four species only appear to have been described :-—T. aphodioides, Latr., from South Europe; 7. flavipes, Melsh., from North America; YP. anisotomoides, Fairm., from D254 : [November, Bou-Saada; and Z. tenuestriatus, Fairm., from Obock. Mr. J. J. Walker, during the voyage of H.M.S. “ Penguin,’ obtained four species, all in numbers; three of these (two from Australia and one from Ceylon) are described below, the other, from Perim, being, no doubt, referable to 7. tenuestriatus, Fairm. All the species (2. aniso- tomoides* excepted) live on sandy seashores, often under stones or seaweed, at or immediately below high-water mark. They are closely allied, differing chiefly inter se in the depth or puncturing of the elytral striz, the ciliation of the margins of the prothorax and elytra, and the sculpture of the under-surface. -Judging from Mr. Walker’s experience, these insects must be very common on some parts of the Australian coast, yet the genus is not mentioned by Pascoe in his List of Australian Heteromera, published in 1866, nor in that of Masters, 1886. TRACHYSCELIS CILIARIS, 7. sp. Short-ovate, castaneous or pitchy-castaneous, shining, the antenne, under-side and legs testaceous or fusco-testaceous ; the marginal ciliz dense. Head and pro- thorax impunctate, the latter obsoletely canaliculate in the middle behind; elytra very short, almost rounded at the sides, broadest at the middle, finely punctate- striate, the inner strize well marked and at the base deeply impressed, the outer striz (the ninth excepted) extremely faint, the punctures fine and closely placed, but becoming much finer laterally, the interstices impunctate, somewhat convex on the disc, perfectly flat at the sides; beneath, including the epipleurse: and propleure, densely punctured. Length, 2,—3% mm. Hab.: W. Avstrauta, E. Wallaby I. in the Houtmann’s Abrolhos Group, Fremantle, and Cape Leeuwin. 3 Many specimens. Of more rotundate shape than 7. aphodioides, the elytra being relatively shorter and more rounded at the sides; the punctures of the elytral striz finer, the inner strie more deeply impressed at the base. The propleure are coarsely punctured. TRACHYSCELIS L&VIS, ”. sp. Short-ovate, castaneous or pitchy-castaneous, very shining, the antenne, under- side and legs testaceous or fusco-testaceous; the marginal cilie sparse. Head and prothorax impunctate, the latter nearly three times as broad as long and with obtuse but distinct hind angles; elytra widest a little behind the middle, very finely and lightly punctate-striate on the disc, the sixth, seventh and eighth strie obsolete or barely indicated, the punctures of the inner strise closely placed and becoming more distinct towards the suture, the marginal stria deep, impunctate, the interstices flat, impunctate ; beneath, including the epipleure and propleurs, sparsely and finely, the middle of the venter densely, punctured. Length, 2,—3 mm. * This species is probably generically distinct. 1893.] ‘ 255 Hab. : W. Austratta, Port Darwin, Cape Leeuwin, E. Wallaby I. in the Houtmann’s Abrolhos Group, Cassini I., Baudin I, and Adéle I. Found in plenty at Baudin and Adéle Islands, more sparingly elsewhere. Allied to 7. cilaris, but narrower ; the elytra more finely and delicately punctate-striate on the disc, the outer striz (the ninth excepted) obsolete or very indistinct ; the interstices flat throughout ; the under-surface and the epipleure more finely punctured; the propleure almost smooth; the marginal cilie sparser. Much smaller than TZ. aphodioides, with the prothorax shorter, the elytral stris more finely and lightly punctured, and the marginal ciliz less dense. Spe- cimens of this and of Z. ciliaris were found by Mr. Walker under seaweed and stones on sandy beaches, at or just below high-water mark. TRACHYSCELIS PALLENS, 7. sp. Short-ovate, testaceous or flavo-testaceous, shining, the ventral segments usually more or less piceous; the marginal ciliew fine and sparse. Head and prothorax im- punctate ; elytra short, finely striate throughout, the striz becoming deeper towards the suture and with exceedingly fine closely placed punctures, the interstices feebly convex on the disc, flat at the sides, smooth; beneath, densely, finely punctate, the middle of the metasternum and the propleuree almost smooth. Length, 23—2} mm. Hab. : Cryton, Colombo. Numerous examples. Smaller and shorter than Z. aphodioides, Latr., and testaceous in colour (the ventral segments excepted) ; the elytral strie distinct throughout, and exceedingly finely punctured : the marginal ciliz sparse.* Horsell, Woking : September, 1893. ON THE GENUS MECEDANUM, ERICHSON. BY DR. D. SHARP, M.A., M.B., F.R.S. The name Mecedanum was proposed by EHrichson about fifty years ago, in a note on p. 274, “ Naturgeschichte Ins. Deutsch.,” iii, but no species has, so far as J am aware, ever been described. Some fifteen years ago I obtained a specimen from Mr. Cowan that I have little doubt belongs to the genus. As it is a highly remarkable form, of great interest in the classification of the Colydiide, I think it well to describe the species, and complete the extremely brief generic charac- ters mentioned by Hrichson. * Mr. G. Lewis informs me thet he has also taken 7. pallens at Colombo, and that he has a species from Japan which he proposes shortly to describe. 956 _ November, The antenne are not clavate, but are of anomalous form, very broad, and increasing in width from the third to the eleventh joint, they are inserted at the sides of the head, the point of insertion being concealed by the projecting margin. The head is short, with very large eyes, which encroach greatly on the under-surface of the head ; the geue project as a sort of toothed process on each side of the mentum. The parts of the mouth can be scarcely seen, but they do not apparently possess any great peculiarity ; the palpi are, however, probably unusually short. The prothorax exhibits a most remarkable character, surpassing perhaps in interest even the gens Nematidium ; this consists in the fact that the lower and hind part of the prosternum is formed by the junction behind the cox of the side pieces which meet in the mesial line ; the base is further augmented: by a remarkable development of the membrane, which borders the hind margin. The front coxe look as if they were quite contiguous, but they are really separated by a lamina immersed between them, and which, behind the coxe, expands to form a compressed prosternal process reposing on the conjoined sides. The mesosternum is unusually elongate, so that a much greater longitudinal space than is usual intervenes between the front anu middle coxe. The metasternum is very elongate, and the middle and hind cox are but slightly separated. There are no inflexed epipleuree, but at the base the wing-cases are edged with a white membrane, which, at the end of the first ventral segment, gives place to a crenate margin. I know of only two other genera that can be considered as at all “related to”? Mecedanum, one of them is Gempylodes, Pascoe, which is a rather close ally, and presents a similar anomalous sternal structure, but in which the front coxe are really contiguous. The other is the genus Endestes, Pascoe, but here the relation is a distant one, the front coxe being only a little exserted, but distinctly separa- ted, while the prosternal process reaches to the posterior margin of the epimera, which, so far as can be seen, are not conjoined, though their membranous borders meet and overlap behind the process as they do in Gempylodes and Mecedanum. This genus, however, also differs in the shorter tarsi, the basal joint of which is but little longer than the second. These insects should, in my opinion, form a separate subfamily in Oolydiide, which may be called Gempylodini, and characterized as follows :— Antenne absque clava, extrorsum crassiores, sub frontis margine laterale 1893. ] : 257 anserte. Coxe anteriores vel contigue vel parum distantes ; processu pro- sternali post eas extenso; membrana basalis pone processum integra. Core posteriores perparum distantes. Tibie apice externo angulatim prominulo. The subfamily has some points of resemblance with Nematidium, which is another of the excessively elongate Colydii, and that no doubt, like the Gempylodini, enter the burrows of wood-boring insects to prey on their inhabitants, but in Nematidium we meet with a different form of antennz, whose insertion also is quite distinct ; while the globular front coxe are covered by the prosternal process ; the basal membrane of the Gempylodini being absent. Nematidium will have to form a separate subfamily or tribe, possessing affinities with the Deretaphrini. Mecepanum ERicusont, 2. sp. Valde elongatum, nigrum, opacum, antennis pedibusque piceis ; fortiter sculpturatum, prothorace medio latius longitudinaliter impresso; elytris subtiliter costatis, interstitiis foveolis biseriatim ornatis. Long., 10 mm. ; lat., 1 mm. Antenne with all the joints stout, the 4th to the 10th transverse, the 11th very large, rounded at the apex, its inner edge very slightly emarginate. Head with rounded epistome, and strongly raised lateral carina, its disc slightly raised and shining, vertex much punctate. Thorax nearly three times as long as broad; the lateral margin very fine ; the surface dull, coarsely and closely punctate, with a deep, very broad, groove extending from front to base. Scutellum extremely narrow, hastate. Elytra with feeble coste, which are somewhat more strongly raised behind, and whose summits are rendered rather irregular by the insertions of a few very distinct minute sete ; the intervals of the costee have a very coarse biserial sculp- ture ; the apices of the elytra are so formed as to leave a deep common notch at the apex. The only example I have seen was found in Madagascar, in the Betsileo district, by Mr. Cowan. Cambridge: September 30th, 1893. P.S.—Since the above was written, I have seen in Mr. Fry’s col- lection an insect having the appearance of Gempylodes, but forming a quite distinct genus, having well-marked antennal grooves extending between the base of the maxille and the eyes. This is probably the genus Aprostoma, of Guérin. This genus was described in 1889, and referred to the Brenthide! Westwood, however, in the “ Transactions of the Entomological Society of London” for 1869 described briefly a second species, and remarked that it was a member of the Colydiide, and not of the Brenthide. Reitter, in the “ Deutsche Ent. Zeit.,” 1878, p. 120, speaking of Aprostoma, puts in a bracket after this name “ Mecedanum, Hrichs.,” 258 { November, from which I presume he considers Aprostoma and Mecedanum to be the same In doing this he perhaps adopted Dohrn’s previous state- ment; but if I am correct in identifying the insect from Atrica in Mr. Fry’s collection with Aprostoma, then Mecedanum (as interpreted by me) and Aprostoma are quite distinct. Aprostoma, however, belongs also to the Gempylodini, and what I have written is not affected if Reitter’s view be correct, other than that Mecedanum Hrichsoni would become the type of a new genus. Westwood’s identification of Aprostoma was made from an ex- amination of Guérin’s unique type; the insects of that genus might be supposed to have some relation to the Brenthide, but Mecedanum Erichsoni has the body sculptured after the fashion of Colydiwm, and could scarcely be considered by any one to have such an affinity. Until, however, we have a description of Hrichson’s original specimen, it is impossible to decide whether Aprostoma and Mecedanum are really the same, actual comparison of the two types being, I believe, unattainable. Coleoptera in Morayshire (concluded from p.71).—I am at length in a position to conclude the list of species of Coleoptera taken by me last autumn near Forres, having worked out, to the best of my ability, all those that were unfinished at the date of my previous communication (p. 68 ante), with the exception of a few Sta- phylinide and Halticide. My total list amounts to about 450 species. Having regard to the period of the year at which they were taken, this seems a large number ; a collector accustomed to the northern fauna would probably have taken far more, but a large quantity of the insects (some 70 or more) were new to me, and in dealing with large numbers of small insects under such circumstances, it is impossible to avoid occasionally overlooking closely allied species. My list includes— Adephaga :—Elaphrus riparius (a) ; both Nebria brevicollis and Gyllenhali (a); Leistus rufescens (e) ; Carabus nemoralis, one very small speci- men floating on a flood; Cychrus rostratus; Dromius nigriventris (e), fairly abundant, 4-maculatus and agilis; Metabletus foveola; Dyschirius globosus and salinus (b), impunctipennis (c), and politus (e); Broscus cephalotes(b); Miscodera arctica(e); all the species of Calathus ; Taphria nivalis on the sandhills ; Olisthopus rotundatus (e) ; Amara acuminata, apricaria, consularis (e), fulva (c), lunicollis (e), and a specimen (2), which working out with the books will only fit into Quenselii—I am really unable to say whatitis; Harpalus rubripes ; Pterostichus versicolor; Bradycellus placidus, similis and harpalinus; Dichirotrichus pubescens (b), both light and dark forms, the former seem chiefly female and the latter male; Patrobus eaxcavatus and assimi- lis, one very stunted specimen with the frontal striation strong, taken in flood refuse ; Cillenus lateralis (6); Bembidium eneum (b), anglicanum (a), atroceruleum (a), bipunctatum (a), decorum (a), femoratum (a), lunatum (b), only one specimen at a time, minimum (b), monticola (a), pallidipenne (c), paludosum (a), in the same spot 1893.) 259 as mentioned by Mr. Hislop in 1867, prasinum (a), punctulatum (a), tibiale (a) ; Tachypus pallipes (b and c); Brychius elevatus; Hydroporus Davisi, 12-pustu- latus, ferrugineus, rivalis, and septentrionis, all in the Moy burn, Agabus arcticus (e), guttatus, biguttatus (e), nebulosus (d). The Brachelytra taken include Falagria sulcata (e); Bolitochara lunulata (A) ; Ocalea castanea, badia and latipennis (all e); Microglossa pulla or nidicola (e) ; Aleochara lanuginosa, morion, nitida and var. bilineata, and obscurella (all d), the latter occurred in large numbers in a dead conger-eel on the coast, right away the farther side of the sandhills. Some specimens of an Aleochara also turned up in fungus on the sandhills, apparently belonging to the form of A. mesta with - reddish elytra. I also took one specimen of the very rare subgenus Aleochara, Hr., but having been unable to secure types, I cannot say whether it is spadicea or procera. Tachyusa umbratica ; Chilopora longttarsis in great numbers and rubi- eunda (both e) ; Oxypoda rupicola, umbrata, annularis, opaca (e),in great numbers, alternans (i) ; Mycetoporus splendidus, lepidus, longulus ? (alle); Myllena brevi- cornis ; Homalota cambrica, elongatula, fusca, gregaria, halobrechtha, insecta, levana (?), longicornis, luridipennis, melanaria, muscorum, nigra, parva, sericea, vestit2, vicina, and (I believe) valida ; Encephalus complicans (e), one only; Gtyro- phena affinis and nana (d); Diglossa mersa (b), both winged and apterous; I came to the conclusion that this insect lives in burrows of Bledius arenarius below high water mark along the Findhorn estuary. Some of the specimens with the wings fully developed have the elytra much longer than others. I notice there is a winged species referred to in Canon Fowler’s Coleoptera as submarina, and said to have been taken in Ireland; I strongly suspect that these specimens belonged to the winged form of mersa. That mersa is not always apterous appears from the note to the species in Canon Fowler’s book, in truth, I think all the specimens have rudi- mentary wings; the winged form with long elytra, which was very scarce at Forres, has certainly a somewhat different appearance from the type, but I think that it is only a race or variety. Tachinus collaris (e), flavipes, one specimen, humeralis, laticollis, and subterraneus (d), with the light humeral spots much shorter than in the common form; Conurus lividus; Bolitobius analis, atricapillus, pygmeus, and trinotatus (all d); Huryporus picipes (e), two specimens; Quedius lateralis (d), in cod’s head bait, also Quedius molochinus and puncticollis (d), in wasp’s nest, as already recorded by me; Xantholinus glabratus ; Philonthus laminatus (e), decorus, politus, proximus, varius, ebeninus, fimetarius, nigriventris, varians, puella, quisquilia- rius or ventralis, and xantholoma; Dianous caerulescens (e) ; Stenus canaliculatus, foveicollis (?), guttula (e), Guynemeri (a), under refuse, oss’um, paganus, picipes, pusillus ; Bledius arenarius, fuscipes, spectabilis (d), subterraneus, opacus, longulus, and pallipes (?) (e), and a specimen I refer to erraticus, but as to which I am doubtful, never having seen a type; Ancyrophorus omalinus and aureus; Anthophagus ni- gritus (e), and testaceus (d) ; apparently all the species of Lesteva. Of the succeeding groups of beetles I may mention—Scymnus suturalis and limbatus ; Otiorhynchus hematopus; Cryptohypnus maritimus (e), riparius (a), and 4-guttatus (a and e), the latter species occurred in two large colonies on the Findhorn banks ; I took a large number of specimens, hoping to find both dermestoides and 4-guttatus. I have every possible variation in the way of spots, and in some specimens the spots are wanting. An examination of the male characters shows, 260 ° | : {November, however, that the insects clearly all belong to the same species. The characters appear to me to agree with a type of ©. 4-guttatus, named by Dr. Horn in Mr. Champion’s collection, so that it would seem to follow, that if C. 4-guttatus and C. dermestoides are really distinct, there are unspotted forms of 4-guttatus as well as spotted forms of dermestoides, and the males alone are capable of being separated ; Malthodes mysticus (d), 1 am somewhat doubtful about this insect; Cyphon varia- bilis, padi, and coarctatus ; Anaspis melanopa (d); Orchesia minor (e); Tetratoma fungorum (e); Salpingus castaneus and e@ratus (e); Rhinosimus ruficollis (e) ; Aphodius porcus, one in flood refuse, rufescens, one at Kincorth; A. merdarius was the commonest species of the genus, so far as I was concerned; Agialia sabuleti occurred fairly commonly (d and e) ; Serica brunnea (e). The Longicorns include only Rhagium bifasciatum near Forres, and Pogono- cherus dentatus (e), which latter insect I took in the beginning of October, a time at which I have also found it in the New Forest. The occurrence of this msect in Scotland has been doubted (vide Fowler’s Coleoptera, vol. iv, p. 247). Lam glad to be able to confirm its occurrence, though I only took a single specimen, and that in flood refuse. The Phytophaga conclude the list. Chrysomela marginata, two specimens in flood refuse, one in a flood at the end of August, and the other in October; C. sta- phylea was very common under seaweed (6), some of the specimens being unusually dull in appearance; Zeugophora Turneri (e); Lina enea (e), one specimen only ; Gonioctena litura (d), common on broom, and pallida (e); Oryptocephalus labiatus (d) ; Crepidodera Modeerit; Mantura rustica; both Spheroderma; Mniophila MUSCOTUN. In some cases [ am unable to give precise localities, but, where possible, I have added letters with the meaning attached to them, as explained at page 72 of this volume.—A. J. Cuirry, 33, Queen’s Gate Gardens, 8.W.: September, 1893. Chrysomela gattingensis.—In his note on this species (Ent. Mo. Mazg., p. 238) the Rev. T. A. Marshall asks why the insect is retained in Chrysomela, instead of in Timarcha? The simple reason is, that in Chrysomela proper the anterior coxal cavities are open, while they are closed in the genus Timarcha; moreover, in the latter genus the posterior legs are much more widely separated than im Chrysomela, besides other minor differences. O. gettingensis is therefore a true Chrysomela.— Martin Jacosy, 7, Hemstall Road, West Hampstead: October, 1893. Apion variegatum, Wencker.—M. Fauvel has recently sent me some specimens of this species from Calvados, Normandy, remarking that it ought to be found in Britain.