- ou yenercne—etim atitoe seen pe es EE eS = 5 3 Serra S ies eS? ceseeer ss) Serta neon d ab dIG By, OTE. ETRE et a Iie ear . = £ . - 7 eed ae ema a 3 ; ~ ea uM - a “ nae ETE ETE RE ere teen = ar ou : Soe . apd See ores — SO ee arts ae eee i a 228 FA AD ae? sh Sate yal A iS Sa ice Fare He es rand et) Ph Hen a Yat ke + Ay vel rs pati) » ody ) aly sea Ah BA tte de oe Pri De inde SP de he Anydin th Su singh, Aden Te 8 Ante Pate te Po tee oh a 3 Otte A ah AR, f + : = At, Om a>; each a SP wa rare - rg Fan as =, Se te de dn Ge Oe the ry = <> ty to Ande Se ,! 2 es a3) SeSeres eee a ior “ ree . r eS ee ees Cy x LLL BD DLP PPP ARBRE MRED RDP OPM PLP LPL LILES OO Te om tn eh them ey te fon ew ee ip oe te - r ae ees . Se ae et ee eS ee’ nde Ae, Pate Ped Gt de Or nd . Sea ia du. oe Dre De mtn De OBS Pe BILD Le KBP PI roe cudege4 PD te hsb Bnd 7 ‘ a ys hy Be te ty ete - . iste nam a —— = P ns 5,5 PPPS SEE SEP Var SPR Sa Tee pet - 7 we ee 7 = ae Lan ng enn eran ar eee cee ee Fx om _- . 2 < : no ee ee ee a eaadmast ataiiniedtadhaaaan arn el oY Sis yy UW YEE eviews ee: Sr . Fs SS ee we ee tee en ee Ee FE BE LM SS AR eae ee - , pay . ; < owt > A ta, Cn ne ee ee ee eS = ay ee we wee ge 3 Ft OB ANE BT / wy ewe a ; ri 3 . POP OPE EN PE WS SO tT 29hEWO0 TOEO OU | IOHM/18W ae 3 as Pui Cal PN Peon YS UPON, HEREDITY AND KINDRED PeOLOGICALY PROBLEMS BY Dr. AUGUST WEISMANN PROFESSOR IN THE UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG IN BREISGAU VOLUME Ii EDITED BY Bow AnD B-POULFON,. M.A... F.RS., EolSovgsG.s. AND ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY, .M-A.,.F 4.5. AUTHORISED TRANSLATION Orford AT THE CLARENDON PRESS 1892 London HENRY FROWDE Oxrorp University Press WaREHOUSE AMEN Corner, E.C. Mew York 112 FourtH AVENUE Mor nOkR’S EPrerach [TO SECOND VOLUME Tue four essays which constitute this Second Volume sup- plement those of the First, by bringing forward new facts to support the earlier ideas, and by improving and completing the latter on the basis of the most recent discoveries. The first two essays afford further support to the arguments in favour of the non-transmission of acquired characters, inas- much as they attempt to prove that these arguments hold in certain cases which at first sight appear to refute them. The diminution of parts which are no longer used has been ex- plained in an earlier essay as the result of the cessation of natural selection, i.e. of panmixia. The conception that every part of the organism is maintained at the level it has reached only by means of the continued activity of natural selection, and that any intermission of this activity leads to a gradual diminution, has passed through many minds. Darwin himself appears to have held this idea, and Romanes, and especially Seidlitz, have more or leas clearly expressed it. But the thought first attained its full significance when we arrived at the definite conclusion that the Lamarckian principle of modi- fication had no real existence, because acquired characters, and hence the decrease which organs suffer by disuse, are not inherited. Thus every explanation of the existence of disused parts in a rudimentary state fails, except panmixia; and the conclusion was unavoidable that the countless characters which enter into our conception of a species can only be maintained at their present level by the ceaseless activity of natural selection. iv AUTHOR'S PREFACE TO SECOND VOLUME. The Second Essay is concerned with the problem as to the origin of those higher mental powers of civilized races which have played no part in the struggle for existence, and the high cultivation of which has been entirely independent of natural selection. I have chosen the art of music as an example, because it presents so deceptive an appearance of improvement by the inheritance of the results of practice from one generation to another. The Third Essay is an answer to the numerous objections which Prof. Vines of Oxford has advanced against many of my views. The reader of the First Volume will perhaps welcome it, as it elucidates some points upon which I have been fre- quently misunderstood. The Fourth and last Essay is not only the longest, but the one to which IJ attach the chief importance, because my views as to the essential meaning of so-called sexual reproduction, and the allied process of conjugation in unicellular organisms reach their final form in it, having been reconstructed on the basis of various new discoveries. I believe that I have solved, at any rate as regards the main points, the problem of the enigmatical double extrusion of polar bodies from the animal egg, and have explained why only a single division of the nuclear substance does not take place. I hope, furthermore, that I have thus confirmed my views upon the general signifi- cance of so-called sexual reproduction,—as a means for pro- ducing hereditary individual variations, and for arranging these variations in ever fresh combinations. My hypotheses have been at times severely handled when shown to be incorrect by the discovery of new facts,—even when these latter were themselves founded on my views. I freely admit that I have made many mistakes ;—my explana- tion of the formation of polar bodies by the egg was at first wrong, then only partially right, and claims to be correct only in the concluding essay. Let who will reproach me: I am not ashamed of this error ; on the contrary, I regard it with a cer- tain satisfaction, for I believe it pointed the path to truth. I AUTHOR'S PREFACE TO SECOND VOLUME. V have left it unchanged in the essays of the First Volume, not only for this reason, but chiefly because it is, I think, of great interest to trace the development of a scientific truth. Hypo- theses, even when not absolutely right, may be of value in advancing our knowledge, if only they are relatively right, i.e. when they correspond with the state of existing knowledge. They are like the feelers which the short-sighted snail stretches forth on its darkened path, testing this way and that, and with- drawing them and altering its route as soon as they come across any obstacle; just as an unyielding fact may show that we are on a wrong road. Rome was not built in a day, and no scientific truth is at once revealed without a prolonged previous history made up of mingled truth and error. The last word has not yet been spoken on the subject dealt with in these essays; but if we remember the complete obscurity which, only ten years ago, surrounded everything which is now clearly revealed in the final essay, we shall not be able to refrain from an inward feeling of satisfaction. Of course, much remains to be done in this department of biology ; but a firm foundation has been laid on which much may be erected. AUGUST WEISMANN. FREIBURG I. B.: 20 August, 1891. EDITORS’ PREFACE TO SECOND VOLUME | ————— WE have wished to add a few words in order to: thank those who have kindly helped us in rendering the last Essay on Amphimixis, which presented exceptional difficulties, accounting for the delay in the appearance of this volume. Early in the present year one of us had the opportunity of consulting Pro- tessor Weismann and bringing under his notice all the most difficult passages in the four essays. As a result of this, the English translation has been modified in some few respects, and, to this extent, represents Professor Weismann more accurately than the original German. We desire to express our warmest thanks to him and to Frdaulein Diestel for the great trouble they have taken in assisting us. In this country our chief thanks are due to Miss Lilian J. Gould, who not only translated the First Essay, but carefully read through the proof sheets of the Essay on Amphimixis, and made many valuable suggestions. We have also been helped on special points by Professors E. Ray Lankester, S. H. Vines, and F. Gotch, and by Mr. D. G. Ritchie. Other kind assistance has been acknowledged in our Preface to the Second Edition, in Volume I. In conclusion, we venture to express the hope that these new essays may deepen the interest already aroused by Professor Weismann’s earlier writings. If this be so, we shall always remember with pleasure the time and work which have been devoted to the production of these Essays in their present form. | Oe 5 Fa! A. +E, SB Oxrorv: May, 1892. CONTENTS OF VOLUME? Il Translator. Title, Page IX. Miss Lirian J. Goutp . MRETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN WATURE; TBGG>. ik) 20 5-5) 2 ea X. Frau LurotrH . . . . THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE IN ANIMALS AND Man, EOOQ: 3/2 Sf ee ee ne ee eee XI. A. E. SHiprey . . . . REMARKS ON CERTAIN PROBLEMS OF THE Day, 1690.) 50 sy se ead XII. THE Epirors AND OTHERS AMPHIMIXIS OR THE ESSENTIAL MEANING OF CONJUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION, 1891 . 99 CUR ee ote eS. a eth NS Hie cael an es Essays in Vol. Il independently Published in this Country. XI. Translated in full in ‘Nature,’ Vol. XLI, pp. 317-323, by G. H. Fow Ler. No further translations or abstracts have appeared. IX. Retrogressive Development in Nature. 1886. A lecture delivered at the ‘Akademische Gesellschaft,’ Freiburg-im-Breisgau, January, 1886. VOL. II. B TX. RET ROGRESSIVEY DEVELOPMENT IN, NATURE. EvoLutTIon in the animal and vegetable kingdoms is generally understood to mean an uninterrupted progress from lower to higher forms of life. Such a view is not, however, strictly correct; for retrogression plays an important part in evo- lution, as.is shown by the fact that an investigation into the history of degenerate forms often teaches us more of the causes of change in organic nature than can be learnt by the study of progressive ones. Such investigation is, therefore, of the deepest interest. To begin with a well-known instance, we are all aware of the existence of birds which cannot fly, and of some among them which do not even possess wings. One of these is the Apteryx of New Zealand, called by the natives ‘ Kiwi-kiwi.’ The most superficial observer would at once remark that this bird lacks something, since it reminds one of a man without arms; for the wings are totally absent, and the place where they should be, is covered with a close smooth growth of hair- like feathers. | Not very long ago the question why this bird should lack wings would have been regarded as sufficiently answered by reference to its mode of life. The Kiwi lives in woods, not in the trees, but on the ground; in the day-time it hides in holes in the ground, and comes out warily at night to hunt the worms and insects which form its prey. It has no need of wings to obtain its food, nor does it stand in any fear of native enemies on the ground; for two species of bat are the only representa- B 2 4 RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. (IX. tives of the Mammalia in New Zealand. In former days it would have been said that the Kiwi was created without wings, because it had no need for them ; but now that we can no longer hold the old simple doctrine of special creation, and are com- pelled to believe that the animals and plants of every age have not been suddenly created out of nothing, but have been de- veloped from ancestral forms, such an assumption can have but little weight. The idea of such special creation is not compatible with the present state of our knowledge; we cannot suppose that the cause of all being called the forms of life into existence in their present form by word alone, but rather by the action of natural forces upon matter, these working together to pro- duce the whole universe of everlasting change, seen in the rise and decline of solar systems, no less than in the evolution and extinction of species. We do not hold that the Kiwi was created out of nothing, but that it was developed from older forms, from species of birds very unlike itself. These birds again were evolved from lizard-like reptiles, which pos- sessed fore- as well as hind-limbs: hence the primitive birds must have had these also, and their fore-legs must have been gradually changed into wings. It is, therefore, certain that the ancestors of the Kiwi possessed wings. Why, then, should the Kiwi have lost them? Furthermore we have positive evidence in support of the above conclusion that the ancestral form possessed wings, which have been eliminated in the existing species—because the Kiwi even now bears traces of them as minute rudiments hidden under its feathers, and although these no longer serve any purpose, the essential structure of the wing is plainly recognizable, and there are even some short crooked feathers which, with their strong shafts, are very like true primary quills. The actual reason why the Kiwi possesses only rudimentary wings is, of course, to be found in the fact that, with its present structure and habits, they would be useless to it, and so far we should be justified in saying that the bird has no wings because it has no use for them. The Kiwi is certainly formed for terrestrial life; its short but strong legs and feet are adapted for scratching the earth or digging out holes under the roots of great trees, and enable it to make its escape swiftly and noise- IX.] RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. 5 lessly, when pursued by the natives or by one of the few indigenous birds of prey. It confines itself almost entirely to the food it can find in the earth, especially worms, in searching for which it is greatly assisted by the long beak with its delicate sense of touch. It drives its bill into the soft damp ground, much as the snipe does, and extracts the worms with great skill and precision. When the species first arose, it was confined to the ground, since nothing was to be gained by leaving it, and the physical structure was therefore adapted to this mode of life, by the gradual elimination of the wings. If the species were only now being formed, the above-mentioned change would most probably not have occurred; for with the invasion of its domain by man, bringing his fire-arms and his cats and dogs, the conditions of life of the Kiwi have been considerably altered, and wings might now stand the helpless bird in good stead. But they have been irretrievably lost, and the race of Kiwis will consequently soon be extinct, like the gigantic ostrich-like birds, the Moas, which are known to have inhabited New Zealand within the memory of man, and the skeletons of which, over twelve feet high, arouse our wonder in museum collections. As the winged ancestors of the Kiwi adapted themselves more and more to life on the ground in the woods, they came to use their wings less and less, and we may safely conclude that this increasing tendency to disuse of the organs of flight, continuing through long generations, affected the organs them- selves, and in some indirect way diminished their size, gradually reducing them to the insignificant appendages we now find. lt is easy to understand how it is that degeneration has gone further in the case of the Kiwi than in that of the ostrich; for, although the latter does not fly, it still uses its wings as aids in running swiftly over the African plains and deserts, while such rapid movement across open country is not necessary for the Kiwi, living as it does in coverts. Short wings with large feathers, like those of the ostrich, would be rather a hindrance than otherwise to the Kiwi in moving quickly through thickets and among underwood, and therefore its wings have been reduced to mere rudiments which are externally altogether invisible. 6 RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. (IX. It is not only among the ostriches that we find degeneration of this kind; certain species of water-birds have become too heavy and awkward to rise into the air, and in these too, for instance in the penguin, the wings are quite useless as organs of flight. But, although useless for flying, they are still of some service for motion in water, and therefore have not degenerated as completely as those of the Kiwi. They have, however, become far smaller than those of flying birds, and, clothed with short scale-like feathers, they bear some resemblance to the fins of fishes. These few instances will suffice to show that nature is pur- poseful, not only in adapting recently developed structures to her uses, i.e. in fitting them to perform properly the functions allotted to them, but, conversely, in removing everything superfluous, so that as soon as a structure is no longer required it is eliminated. Of course, this elimination is neither sudden nor voluntary, but comes to pass gradually, in accordance with certain laws, so that we are often able to watch every stage of the transition from the full development of an organ to the entire absence of it. Such degeneration of once important parts is not only found here and there in nature; it is of frequent, nay, among the higher animals, of general occurrence. It is in fact a natural consequence of the evolution of the higher animals of to-day from earlier and lower forms, which lived under totally different conditions, necessitating the possession of parts and organs, which, in process of time, have been either altered or com- pletely atrophied. If nature had not possessed the power to cause the disappearance of superfluous organs, there could have been no such thing as the transmutation of species; for primitive structures, when they became superfluous, would have been in the way of those in actual use and would have hindered their development. Indeed, had the retention of all original structures been a necessity from the first, the result would have been the production of monsters quite unfit to live. Hence the retrogression of superfluous structures is a condition of progression. Having found disuse to be the immediate cause of the dis- appearance of a structure in the course of the development of a species, we may further ask how a structure once essential to IX.] RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. 7 life can fall into disuse. Obviously, this can only happen through a change in the conditions under which the animal lives. When a bird which has been accustomed to seek its food in trees and bushes, finds upon the ground supplies so rich as to afford better sustenance, it will gradually come to live more and more upon the ground, and less and less in trees, a fact which taken alone will entirely alter the conditions of its life. It will not require to fly, and will consequently fly less and less often, and after the lapse of generations will cease to fly altogether. And to bring all this about, the wood in which it lives, the climate, the surrounding animals, need not have undergone any changes; merely the adoption of a new habit by the bird itself will suffice. It is the same with animals removed from their original habitat; they may find themselves in circumstances so essen- tially different as to render superfluous some organ which had once been indispensable. For instance, if a species which had always lived in the light, were to find its way into some new habitat where there was complete darkness, its eyes would be- come useless to it; and accordingly we commonly find that in such species the eyes have more or less completely atrophied. This is the case, for instance, with animals which live in dark caves. Inthe limestone caverns of Carniola and Carinthia a blind amphibian, the Proteus, is found in great numbers, and there are also blind Crustacea (both isopods and amphipods), blind insects and snails. In the Mammoth Cave of Kentucky among other blind animals we find a blind fish and a blind fresh-water crayfish. It is almost superfluous to offer any further proof that these species are descended from ancestors which possessed the power of sight, beyond the fact that the caverns in question have not existed from the beginnings of organic life, and that therefore the animals must have lived in the light before they entered them. Nevertheless, in many of these animals direct proof exists in the fact that they still possess vestiges of what have once been eyes. The Proteus and the blind fish of the Mammoth Cave have small imperfectly- developed eyes under the skin, which are no longer of any use as organs of sight. In the case of the blind crayfish, the eyes have entirely disappeared, although the moveable stalks upon which they were placed still remain. 8 RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE, [IX. Caves are not the only places where animals are known to live in the dark; in deep wells and at the bottom of the sea and of lakes complete darkness reigns. To Professor Forel of Morges we owe the discovery of the depth to which light can penetrate. Photographic plates were sunk at night to a certain depth, and after being suspended to a buoy, were exposed, for a period of from twenty-one to twenty-four hours, to such light as could reach them. By this means Forel found that even in the transparent water of the Lake of Geneva, the light in winter, when the water is clearest, only penetrated to a depth of 100 metres, and scarcely 50 metres in summer. Later experiments by Fol and Sarasin, with more perfect apparatus and more highly sensitive plates, proved, however, that light penetrates the Lake of Geneva to the greater depth of 170 metres. On a bright day there is about as much light at such a depth as we are accustomed to see on a Starlight night, when there is no moon. Below this there is utter darkness; and we find blind animals from these downwards to the greatest depths (300 metres), at which, for example, a blind isopod and an amphipod exist. In the sea, when the water is undisturbed, light penetrates as far as 400 metres, but as we now know that animal life exists in the sea at a depth of 4000 metres, there still remains a vast region in which darkness reigns, and in which numberless blind animals are found,— blind fish, blind crustaceans of various species, blind molluscs and worms. Forms nearly related to all these live where the light penetrates, and possess eyes. Burrowing animals, too, have, for the most part, either poorly- developed eyes or none at all. Thus earthworms are sightless, while closely-allied pelagic species generally possess eyes, often very highly developed, and of complex structure. The common mole has indeed eyes, although very small ones, completely hidden in its close fur, but in Africa there are moles which are devoid of eyes and therefore entirely blind. Many other instances might be brought forward to prove that the disuse of the organs of vision results in their disappear- ance. And the same conclusion holds good for other organs ; experience teaches that, as soon as any organ falls into disuse, it degenerates and is finally lost altogether. We find interesting confirmation of this fact in the other 1X.] RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. 9 organs of special sense, although cases of the disuse of these are of less frequent occurrence. Thus the caecilians, tropical worm-like or snake-like amphibians, living underground, have lost not only the sense of sight, but that of hearing also. They possess neither tympanum nor tympanic cavity, and although the auditory vesicle, which is buried in the interior of the skull, still exists, the auditory nerve, which should be in con- nection with it, supplying its sensitive nerve-endings, has entirely disappeared. The sense of hearing must have become useless to them in their life underground, or the organ would not have degenerated’. They are compensated for the want of it by a remarkably keen sense of smell, which is more highly developed in these animals than in any other vertebrates. Instances are also known of disuse causing degeneration in the sense of smell; thus the whales and dolphins have more or less completely lost this organ which is so highly developed in the rest of the Mammalia. Retrogression is, however, not always carried so far as to do away with a structure altogether, although this generally happens with the organs of sense, because they can scarcely be adapted to other uses. But not infrequently the degenerat- ing organ can be turned to account in some other way, and then 1 It is now known that the above statements as to the existence of a rudimentary auditory organ in Caeciliaare erroneous. Recent researches have shown us that these animals not only possess a complete auditory apparatus, but that it is even more perfect than in other Amphibia. In their splendid ‘Ergebnisse zoologischer Forschungen auf Ceylon,’ Heft 4, 1890, the cousins Sarasin have given an accurate account of the auditory organ of a caecilian (Epicrium), and show that it is very far from being in a degenerate condition. It possesses all the essential parts, the auditory nerve is even larger than usual, and one of the ‘ maculae acusticae’ present is unrepresented in other Amphibia. These writers even prove that, in addition to the ordinary apparatus, many accessory auditory organs are present in the skin, each of which contains an otolith: these are homo- logous with the ‘ organs of the lateral line’ of other Amphibia and of fish. Up to the present time our knowledge of the auditory organ of Caecilia has been founded upon the statements of two excellent observers, Pro- fessors Retzius and Wiedersheim; but the material at their disposal was restricted to a few badly preserved specimens. We must therefore maintain that the organ of hearing as well as that of smell has been especially developed in the caecilians as a compensation for the want of eyesight. Those conditions of life that would render the power of hearing useless do not appear to exist. As a result of these recent researches, I am now unable to adduce an example of a rudi- mentary auditory organ.—A.W., 1891. ; 10 RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. (IX. retrogression either stops just short of actual elimination, as in the case of the wings of the ostrich, or so alters and transforms the structure as to fit it for new functions, like the wings of the penguin, which aid it in swimming. The far-reaching effects, on the development of species, of retrogression consequent upon disuse are nowhere to be seen more clearly than among parasitic animals. Many groups of animals contain certain genera, families, or even whole orders, which live at the expense of other animals, feeding on their blood or tissues, yet not killing them after the manner of beasts of prey. Such are the parasites, some of which only seek their unwilling host when impelled by hunger, and leave it as soon as they are satisfied; while others take up their abode in or upon it, only to be driven thence by its death. The great group of worms includes very many parasites, and they are almost as numerous among the Crustacea. Most crustaceans are free-swimming or actively running inhabitants of the water, especially of the sea, and their food is partly of a vegetable nature and partly consists of living or dead animals; but nearly every order includes some parasitic form, in which the effects of disuse resulting from parasitism are plainly traceable. A visit to the fish-market at any European sea-port, and an examination of some of the larger fish, will generally lead to the discovery of certain segmented animals firmly attached to the integument, and bearing some resemblance to wood-lice. These parasites, called fish-lice, suck the blood of the fish. They are not permanently fixed, but leave their host from time to time and seek a fresh one. Now these animals exhibit with great clearness the effects of parasitic habits: their legs are short, being no longer required for swimming, but chiefly for holding on by, and the organs of sense also are somewhat degenerate, for parasites scarcely need them. It is, of course, necessary for predaceous crustaceans to be able to distinguish their prey at a distance, and for this purpose they require keen sight and a delicate sense of touch in their antennae ; but para- sitic forms, when once attached to their host, do not readily leave it, or if they do so, a new host is easily found, since fish are mostly gregarious. Hence in these fish-lice the eyes and antennae have become small and insignificant. IX.] RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE, TI This is, however, but the first step in retrogressive develop- ment: more marked effects are witnessed in forms which are more completely and permanently fixed to their hosts. To the same crustacean order belong the En/foniscidae, which are internally parasitic upon other crustaceans, especially upon the common shore-crab (Carcinus maenas). During their whole life, these parasites never leave the host, nor move from the position they have once taken up within it. They live attached to its liver, sucking the juices; after growing enormously and producing thousands and thousands of eggs, they finally die. It is clear that such a mode of life must render superfluous, and therefore degenerate, many structures which were essential to -their free-swimming ancestors. Thisretrogression takes place to such a degree, and the whole structure of the animal is thereby so modified and altered that they are scarcely recognizable as Crustacea. The characteristic segmentation of the body is entirely lost, and the hard exo-skeleton is replaced by a thin soft skin. The body lengthens to a vermiform shape, acquires peculiar pointed appendages for the reception of the eggs, and becomes colourless, like that of all animals which live in the dark. All these modifications are quite intelligible; the seg- mentation of the crustacean body facilitates movement, while the hard exo-skeleton serves for the attachment of muscles. The eyes and antennae completely disappear, because the animal lives in darkness, and does not need to see, and because the sense of touch is unnecessary to it after it has once taken up its position. Not a vestige remains of certain mouth-organs which are well developed in allied species; and the legs, of which free-swimming forms have seven thoracic and six abdominal pairs, are reduced in number. The internal organs are also reduced, with the single exception of the ovaries, which increase so much in size that the animal appears like a mere bag of eggs. It may now be asked how we know this peculiar vermiform being to be a crustacean and an Isopod at all. We know this to be a fact because there are many other parasitic Isopods in which degeneration has not gone so far, and which present well-marked stages of transition from the above-mentioned - fish-lice to the Entoniscidae. Furthermore, the descent of the Entoniscidae from free-swimming forms is clearly proved by 12 RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. (IX. the fact that the young still resemble the latter in the possession of eyes and antennae, segmented bodies, well developed jaws, and numerous legs: in short, in all essential points of structure, they exactly resemble the locomotive forms. The young of the Entoniscidae are actually free-swimming organisms, and it is necessary for the perpetuation of the species that they should be so, for how could the parent animal, possessing no organs of locomotion, leave its original host for a fresh one? And yet such a change is essential for the continuance of the species; for in course of time the hosts will die. Under such circumstances the young Enjoniscidae leave the mother as perfect Isopods, make their way out of the host, and lead a free-moving life in the sea until they find and enter another Carcinus maenas: they then undergo a whole series of retrograde changes in rapid succession, and finally attain the remarkable vermiform shape already spoken of. Of course, retrogressive development did not reach anything like this degree at first ; it was only attained after the lapse of countless generations, and a passage through many intermediate forms. The original parasitic Isopods lived no doubt, like the fish-lice, attached to the external integument of their host; these were followed by others which took up their abode in the internal cavities of the body, in the respiratory chamber and the alimentary canal. Gradually increasing modification then occurred, as the parasites found their way farther and farther into the internal organs. The LEufoniscidae are not the most extreme cases of retrogressive development among the para- sitic Crustacea; there are species in which not only the legs, antennae, eyes, and segments of the body, but the whole head, and even the stomach, intestines, and mouth disappear; food being taken in through peculiar root-like tubes, which absorb the juices of the host in such a manner as to supply ready made nourishment which needs no digestion. But the Entoniscidae afford sufficient proof of the extraordinary effect of the disuse of certain parts in transforming the whole organic structure of a species. Since we find that disuse of an organ is always followed by its gradual disappearance in the course of many generations, the supposition naturally arises that this decline is the direct consequence of disuse, and that the inactivity of an organ is the IX.] RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. 13 immediate cause of its degeneration, a view which has hitherto actually been held, and which at first seems credible enough and even plausible. It is, of course, a well-known fact, although perhaps the subject has hardly been sufficiently studied, that parts which are much used grow larger and more powerful, while those which are seldom exercised become small and weak. Constant gymnastic exercise will immensely increase the size and strength of the muscles of our arms; while these limbs will lose what strength they once possessed if the muscles are never exerted. The performances of athletes afford us the best examples of the extent to which practice can increase the muscular strength and activity of man; and, on the other hand, those who work at occupations entailing a sedentary life and lack of exercise plainly show the weakening effects of disuse. Experi- ments prove this still more clearly: when the nerve supplying a muscle is cut, degeneration of the muscle ensues, because its activity is at an end, and the same thing happens with glands, when their functions are disturbed by severing the nerves which supply them. We may accept the general proposition that an organ may be strengthened by exercise, and weakened by a long continued state of inactivity. It is not necessary here to go into the question of how this is brought about, nor has it been as yet completely explained: it is sufficient for our present purpose to know that such is the case. Since we may take it for granted that disuse of an organ will lead to its degeneration, even in the life-time of a single in- dividual, may we not also conclude that the gradual disappear- ance of a superfluous structure in the course of generations is due simply to the tendency to degeneration being handed down from one generation to another, and thus gradually intensified to the extent of complete elimination?. For supposing disuse to produce infinitely small effects during the life of each in- dividual, yet surely these effects would be cumulative, and in course of generations the organ would gradually diminish in importance, become smaller and weaker, and ultimately dis- appear altogether. This explanation, obvious as it may seem to be, cannot be the right one, for there are many facts which are quite incom- patible with it. 14. RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. (IX. In the first place, it compels us to assume as a fact what has often been asserted, but never yet proved, viz. the hereditary transmission of acquired characters. It is well known that many mental and physical qualities of parents are transmitted to their children, such as the colour of the eyes and hair, the shape and size of the finger-nails; and not only these but, as everyone knows, even such minute and indefinable physical and mental characteristics as likeness of features, bearing, gait, handwriting, a mild and equable or passionate and irritable temperament. But all these characters are blastogenic, or inherent in the parents; whether they first show themselves early or late, they have existed in the parents in a more or less marked degree and in different combinations, from the beginning. Characters only acquired by the operation of external circumstances acting during the life of the indi- vidual, cannot be transmitted. The loss of a finger is not inherited ; all the thousand faculties which are gained by the exercise of various organs or of the whole body are purely personal acquirements, and are not handed down to posterity. No case was ever known of a child being able to read without being taught, even though the parents had exercised their faculties in this direction all their lives. Children do not even learn to speak untaught, although not only their parents, but countless generations of ancestors, have exercised and per- fected the brain and vocal organs by learning and speaking a language. It may now be considered as satisfactorily established that children of civilized nations, if brought up in a wilderness and cut off from all communication with man, would make no attempt at speech. For proof of this I need not fall back on the not very well authenticated story of the Persian monarch, who is said to have made the cruel experi- ment of taking twenty new-born children and bringing them up together, without ever allowing them to hear a word of human speech; they are supposed never to have made any sound resembling speech, but to have imitated with great fidelity the bleating of a goat which lived among them. The same thing is told in all the well-known cases of young or adult persons found living in an utterly wild state in the woods, - cases which have occurred from time to time up to the last century in Germany, France, England and Russia. Nearly all IX.] RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE, 15 these persons are said to have uttered sounds resembling the cries of wild animals with which they had associated, but not one was ever known to speak. When we consider the constant and unremitting practice in speech which we gain in a life-time, whether by speaking aloud or merely by thinking to ourselves, and remember that in spite of the effect of this perpetual exercise for centuries upon the human brain and vocal organs, —the power of speech has not become in the slightest degree fixed or intensified by heredity, I think that we are justified by this one fact alone in altogether doubting whether acquired characters can ever be transmitted in any real sense. Moreover their transmission is quite incompatible with the only theory of heredity which seems to me to be tenable. But if the results of the exercise of an organ are not inherited, neither can the effects of disuse be handed down. Hence, if this be true, the retrograde changes taking place during the lives of individuals cannot possibly be intensified in the course of generations; for the process of retrogression would have to begin afresh in each generation successively, and thus would never advance any farther than it did in the individuals of the first. We must, then, regard this supposition that degenera- tion is caused by mere disuse as a mistaken one, and seek a more satisfactory explanation of the facts. I think, moreover, that such an explanation is to be found in what may be called reversed natural selection. To state my meaning more clearly, Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace have taught us to understand by ‘natural selection’ that process of elimination effected by nature itself without the aid of man. Inasmuch as far more individuals are born than can possibly live, only the best are enabled to survive, the best being those which are so formed as to be the ‘fittest,’ as we say, for the conditions of life in which they are placed. As in each generation only the fittest survive and propagate the species, their qualities only are transmitted, while the less useful qualities of the weaker individuals die out. Each successive generation will therefore consist of individuals better organized than those of the pre- ceding one, and thus useful characters will be gradually intensified from generation to generation, until the greatest possible degree of perfection is reached. Probably this theory 16 RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. (IX. is far from new to many of my readers: it has been so often explained in various well-known works and periodicals, that any further elucidation is unnecessary. What holds good for the individual as a whole also holds good for each separate organ, inasmuch as the ability of an animal to perform its allotted functions depends on the efficiency of each particular organ: hence, by means of this perpetual elimination of the unfit, every organ is brought to the greatest perfection. On this hypothesis, and on this only, is it possible to explain the wonderful adaptability of the minutest details of structure in animals and plants, and the development of the organic world through the operation of natural forces. If this view be the true one, if adaptation in all the parts of living forms be truly the result of natural selection, then the same process which produced these adaptations will tend to preserve them, and they will disappear directly natural selection ceases to act. These considerations show why organs which have become superfluous and have fallen into disuse necessarily degenerate and ultimately disappear. As an example of this, let us take one of the newts, which are sO common in our swamps and pools in spring. If we . examine its eyes we find that they are not very large, but very highly developed: their structure bears considerable likeness to that of the human eye, and they play a very important part in the life of the animal, which is almost entirely dependent on keenness of vision for finding its prey. It detects at once and snaps at anything in motion: were it not for its eyes, it would infallibly starve. Now,these eyes are extremely delicate and complex organs, which have only very gradually,—i. e. in the course of countless generations and of almost endless time,— reached the degree of perfection attained by them in the living newt. The whole series of developmental stages is not indeed known to us; but in other groups of animals we find eyes at every grade of development, and from these we can form some idea of the way in which the gradual improvement of an original simple and imperfect eye took place. The slow but steady progress in development from stage to stage is due, as I believe, to the fact that the eyes of these animals were never all exactly alike, nor all equally keen, and that only those individuals survived in each generation in which the develop- IX.] RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. 17 ment of the eyes was above the average. This process of natural selection would not only gradually produce improve- ment in the eye, but would also tend to keep the improvement, when gained, up to a certain standard. Now suppose such a species to have been carried under- ground by water into a dark cavern. It would only gradually adapt itself to the new conditions and thus be enabled to thrive in the cave: but after the lapse of generations the individuals would have learnt to live in complete darkness, and to distinguish and catch their prey without the aid of sight, and this would be rendered possible by an improvement in other organs, especially those of touch and smell. Thus in course of time a race of newts would be produced perfectly adapted for life in the dark, and for finding food by scent alone and not by sight ; and this race would make its way farther and farther underground, and pass its whole life in utter darkness. It is in some such way as this that not only the entrances of caverns, but whole series of caves, connected by subterranean streams, rivers and lakes, like those in the Karst Mountains, near Trieste, have come to be tenanted by animals. Directly, however, such cave-dwellers became able to exist without using their eyes, degeneration of these organs would set in: as soon as they ceased to be essential to the life of the animal, natural selection would be powerless to affect them, for it would be immaterial whether the eyes of any animal were above or below the standard. Hence the individuals with weaker sight would no longer be eliminated, but would have an equal chance of surviving and propagating their species. Crossing would then take place between individuals with strong and weak eyes, and the result would be a gradual deterioration of the organ. Possibly the process might be accelerated by the circumstance that small and degenerate eyes would be rather an advantage, because their decrease would involve an increase in the powers of other and now more important organs, such as those of touch and smell. But even independently of this, the eye, directly it ceases to be kept up to a certain standard of development by natural selection, will gradually deteriorate, the process being very slow at first, but absolutely sure. The same simple explanation suffices for ad/ cases of retro- gressive development, whether of organs or species. On any VOL. Il. E 18 RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. (IX. other theory many facts are incapable of explanation, even assuming the possibility of the hereditary transmission of acquired characters, such as those produced by disuse. It is clear that degeneration as a result of disuse can only take place in an organ the activity of which depends upon its exercise, so that a real effect is produced by the discharge of function. The act of seeing involves certain chemical changes in the retina of the eye, and perhaps even in the optic nerve, processes which do not take place when the eye is no longer exposed to light. Flying involves metabolism in the muscles which move the wings, and this also ceases when flight is at an end. Sothat an actual retrogressive influence is exerted on certain parts of the eye and on the muscles, by disuse. But how can the stamens of a plant be affected by the failure or success of their pollen in finding its way to the stigma of another flower? Yet we know that hermaphrodite flowers sometimes revert to the original condition in which the sexes were separate, and this by the gradual atrophy of the stamens in one flower and the style in another. Whether this particular case is to be explained by the cessation or by the active operation of natural selection, is another question, which we may proceed to consider. After the anthers, in the course of evolution, have withered away and disappeared, their stalks (the filaments) remain, and are often of considerable height and thickness. Slowly and very gradually these degenerate also: we find them quite long in some species, in others short, while in others again they have completely disappeared, only reappearing now and then in single instances to remind us that they were once of normal occurrence. It is true that the filaments are no longer useful, but how can this fact have any direct effect in causing them to degenerate ? Their structure remains the same, the sap circulates in them as before and supplies nourishment to them as well as to the petals and the style. From my point of view the matter is intelligible enough ; for the bare filaments which have lost their anthers are in no way essential to the life of the species : natural selection is powerless to affect them and they gradually degenerate. Even more striking instances are to be found in the animal kingdom. Why have most of our domestic animals lost their IX.] RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. 19 original colouring ? Clearly because colour became of little or no importance to them as soon as they were sheltered under the protection of man, while in a wild state it was a great safeguard against detection by their enemies. Similarly the hairy covering has ceased to be of importance to certain of the Mammalia—and has disappeared. Thus whales and dolphins have a naked skin for the most part entirely devoid of hair, although they are unquestionably descended from hairy ancestors, and even now rudimentary hairs may be detected in certain parts of the body by the aid of the micro- scope. Obviously, the disappearance of the hairy covering cannot be a direct consequence of disuse, for hair will grow as well, whether its protective warmth be useful or of no import- ance to the animal. but its disappearance as an indirect consequence of disuse is plain; for as soon as an immense thickness of blubber was developed beneath the skin of the whale, the warmth of an additional covering was unnecessary : the hair becoming superfluous, natural selection ceased to affect it, and degeneration at once set in. If anyone is inclined to doubt whether the direct action of sea-water may not have caused the disappearance of the hair, it is only necessary to point to the group of seals, in which all the smaller species possess a thick coat of fur, while, among the larger kinds, the walrus has but a scanty covering of bristles, because, like the whale, it has developed a layer of blubber, which is amply sufficient to protect its huge body from cold. Examples of an entirely different kind are afforded by those animals which hide themselves in cases or houses. The hermit-crab partly conceals itself in empty shells, the aquatic larvae of caddis-flies (Phryganidae) build cases within which their cylindrical bodies are enclosed, and the larvae of certain small moths (Psychidae) dothe same. Whenever the body of any such animal is thus partially enclosed in a case, the protected parts are soft and whitish, i. e. more or less colourless, while the exposed parts retain the ordinary hard integument of the Arthropoda and are variously and strongly coloured. Now we may maintain that, in a certain sense, the hard integument of craks and insects fulfils the ‘function’ of protecting the soft parts of the animal from injury, but, correctly speaking, this defence is not a real function at all, because the exercise of C2 20 RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. (IX. function implies activity, while the use of the hard integument can only be of a passive kind. The horny covering itself is not in the least affected, whether it is useful or useless as a defence against stings and bites: such assaults are quite immaterial to it, nor does its condition in any way depend upon the frequency or rarity of attack. Degeneration cannot, then, be the result of the protection afforded to the integument. Inasmuch as the integument of all the three kinds of animals mentioned above only degenerates in those parts which are protected by the case, clearly the only explanation must be that the hard cover- ing is unnecessary for those parts which are otherwise protected, and that consequently natural selection has no power to preserve it. But the most striking instances are to be found among the social insects, especially the ants. The male and female ants are winged, and at certain times of the year rise into the air in great swarms. Everyone must have seen these swarms filling the air in summer and autumn: they may often be seen on the top of a hill, or surrounding the summit of some tower, alighting on walls and parapets or covering the hats and clothes of people. The males and females, however, form the minority in an ant- community, the greater number being workers—the common wingless ants. Now these workers, in the course of the develop- ment of the species, have forfeited their wings as a consequence of disuse, because the power of flight would be useless to them, and they would be exposed to even greater dangers in the air than on the ground. The business of their lives is to forage for food-supplies, and to collect building materials for the nest, but everything which they seek is obtainable on the ground: they have also to feed the larvae and tend the pupae, and to them alone belongs the defence of the nest if attacked. All these tasks bind them to a life on the ground ; hence, when in former days, they were being gradually developed from perfect females, they came to use their wings less and less, as they gave them- selves up more and more completely to the duties allotted to them. Now, in this case also, it would at first sight seem prob- able that the long continued disuse produced a certain amount of degeneration in each individual, that this first retrograde change was inherited by the succeeding generation, and gradually intensified by further disuse, and so on. Such a view is, how- IX.] RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. 21 ever, entirely disposed of by a fact which admits of no dispute and cannot be explained away, viz. the fact that the workers of ants are infertile, and do not propagate their species. Consequently, itis impossible that the degeneration caused by disuse during individual lives should be handed down, and the elimination of the wings is only explicable on the other theory, which ascribes it to the cessation of the operation of natural selection which ensued when the wings became useless and of no importance. It may certainly be objected that the disappearance of the wings might have taken place before the workers became infertile; but such a supposition cannot be accepted, for reasons which I need not enter upon here. The infertility of workers may also be regarded as a difficulty from my point of view, but it must be remembered that the principle of the elimination of the un- fittest does not act directly on the workers, but on their parents, the propagators of the species. In other words, natural selec- tion does not affect the workers themselves, but the parents, and determines their survival according as they produce perfect or imperfect workers. The process by which the degeneration of superfluous organs takes place may fittingly be called ‘universal crossing’ (Pan- mixia), because it implies that not those individuals only in which any particular organ is best developed survive and propagate their species, but that survival is quite independent of the efficiency or non-efficiency of the organ. This process of Panmixia must have had, and must have still great influence on the development of the organic world. The changes wrought by evolution have been and are innumerable, and they by no means always occur in an upward direction, but often—as shown in the case of the parasites—in a downward one, or perhaps most frequently in both directions at once, the change being retrogressive in one part and progressive in another. And very often the former change may actually lead to the latter. We ourselves could hardly have attained so high a degree of intellectual development, had we not forfeited a considerable share of the physical advantages possessed by our remote ancestors. The savage tribes which depend upon the chase, are gifted with a much keener sense of hearing, smell, and sight than we are, and this is not merely the result of constant training, but is also due to the inheritance of more 22 RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. (IX. efficient organs. In this respect civilization has caused de- generation in us, by means of Panmixia, owing to the fact that the well-being of individuals no longer depends upon the highest possible development of their sense-organs. At the present day we are able to make a living equally well, whether our sense of hearing or smell is delicate or the reverse, and even keenness of sight is no longer of decisive importance to us in the struggle for existence. Ever since the invention of spectacles, short-sighted persons—in the higher classes at any rate—experience hardly any greater difficulty in getting a living, than that endured by people with keen sight. In former times a short-sighted soldier or general would have been a sheer impossibility, and so would a short-sighted hunter: in all grades of society short sight used to be a very real disadvantage and an almost complete bar to advancement of any kind. This is no longer the case now; a short-sighted man makes his way in life as successfully as any other, and his defect, if congenital, will be transmitted to his children, and will therefore tend to make hereditary short sight commoner among certain classes. Of course short sight may also be an acquired character, and in such cases it is, I venture to affirm, not transmitted. But I believe that the great prevalence of short sight is not only due to the injuries acquired by over-straining the eyes and con- tinually looking at near objects, but also to Panmixia, or cessa- tion of the action of natural selection,—a law to which we are naturally subject in common with other animals. Much might be said of the effects of civilization in causing physical degeneration, which indeed appears to be on the increase. Consider fora moment the teeth: the art of dentistry has been brought to such a pitch of perfection, that artificial teeth are now almost to be preferred to natural ones. At any rate no one need die now from insufficient nourishment in consequence of the inability to masticate food, and there is nothing to prevent the transmission of a predisposition to bad teeth to any number of descendants. Nevertheless we need not fear that civilization will ever lead to utter degeneration in man. The antidote is to be found in the very process which causes the first deterioration of an organ; for obviously such deterioration can only continue as long as it is not injurious to the individual in the struggle for IX.] RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE, 23 existence, and when that point is reached natural selection will interfere to prevent further degeneration. To return to our former example, it is quite conceivable that the percentage of persons with hereditary short sight may steadily increase, without seriously affecting the general standard of vision of mankind as a whole, or even that of a single nation or class, because degeneration below a certain point would become a fact of decisive importance to the individual, leading to failure in the struggle for existence. Thus we need not fear the com- plete loss of our eyes through degeneration, like that which has affected the animals living in the dark and the above- mentioned parasites; and we need not anticipate any serious diminution of our muscular strength, or powers of endurance, or many other qualities. Hitherto I have only treated of the degeneration of physical characters in consequence of disuse and Panmixia, but the same thing takes place with mental qualities, a fact which need not surprise us when we remember how close is the connection between all mental and physical processes, how the relative size and complexity of the brain is a measure of the degree of intelligence, and how every instinctive action of an animal pre- supposes a corresponding arrangement of the nervous system which compels a certain action to follow upon a certain stimulus. Hence degeneration of an instinct in an animal must always have been preceded by degeneration of that network of nerve- cells and nerve-fibres in the brain in which the instinctive action had its rise. Retrogression, then, in physical structure is not antagonistic to retrogression in instinct and mental faculty, but mental and physical degeneration rather go hand in hand. Very definite and extensive physical degeneration always implies a corresponding mental deterioration. Those Entoniscidae which have lost their eyes, antennae, legs, and jaws, have also degenerated in intelligence, as is but natural in animals which only require to remain still and imbibe nourish- ment: the whole nervous system of these Crustacea has been reduced to a remarkable degree. Certain examples are most interesting as tending to prove that retrogression may be confined to one particular instinct, leaving the animal and its powers as a whole quite unaffected. The loss by domestic animals of the instinct to escape is one of 24 RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. [IX. these examples. Almost all wild animals, mammals as well as birds, possess the instinct to escape: they are not only extremely attentive to the slightest sound and smell, and to every movement taking place within their field of vision, but all of them, the predaceous animals not excepted, are continually mindful of their safety, and though not always consciously on the watch, are so to a great extent instinctively. A wild bird flies away at the least sound; a hedgehog which has been surprised, and has rolled itself up, only unrolls itself to run away after the lapse of a considerable time, while the slightest suspi- cious sound will make it roll up even more tightly. These acts are not the result of reflection, but are purely instinctive, the act of rolling-up being always associated with the perception of sound, so that the former follows instantaneously upon the latter, before the animal has had time to reflect on its meaning, just as we shut our eyes the instant that anything touches them. In the higher animals these movements are certainly under conscious control, i.e. they are capable of suppression, and hence it is that animals in a state of captivity lose the instinct of being startled and of escaping. This instinct is nevertheless deeply implanted in them, and many generations must be passed in domestication before the natural timidity is lost. I believe that the loss is brought about by cessation of the action of natural selection, and a consequent gradual degene- ration of the instinct. Of course it is difficult to judge of the amount of influence exercised by custom upon the life of the individual, but it may at least be considered as certain that the young of our domestic fowls, geese, and ducks, have lost much — of the instinct to escape possessed by their wild ancestors, and that they would never become quite wild again even if placed under the care of a wild mother from the first. The length of time which may be necessary before domes- tication can get the better of this passive kind of wildness, as the instinct to escape may be called, is seen in the case of the guinea-pig. These animals have been domesticated ever since the discovery of South America about 400 years ago,—a period of time which has not sufficed to overcome their natural timidity. Any loud noise will make them start violently and seek to escape, although they may never in their lives have had any experience of real danger: even shortly after birth the same IX.] RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. 25 thing will happen. In these, as with the various species of pheasants which have been domesticated, the young animals are the wildest: the instinct to escape has been inherited almost unaltered, and the process of taming must begin afresh with each individual. The tameness of the adult animal is here still an acquired character, i.e. one acquired during the lifetime of the individual, and is not inherent, or rather, it is not the re- sult of those changes in the potentialities of the germ which are gradually produced by universal crossing. The tameness comes about just as in wild animals taken young, such as foxes, wolves, rats, or finches, all of which are tameable up to a certain point,and become accustomed to the absence of enemies. It is also interesting to note that loss of the instinct which impels animals to seek their food may sometimes occur. Both food itself and the power of obtaining it are essential to life, and the instinct of seeking food may be looked upon as the first and earliest developed of any: yet it may be partially or even entirely lost. The young of many birds no longer possess the instinct; they open their bills and cry, and they swallow food placed in their mouths, but they have no idea of picking it up if scattered on the floor of their cage; the sight of food does not result in any impulse to eat. At this early period of life such birds have not learned the art of feeding themselves, and this is not unnatural; for they leave the egg in a very unde- veloped condition, and their parents feed them by putting food into their mouths. A part of the food-seeking instinct has thus become superfluous and has disappeared. It may be objected that the little creatures are too undeveloped to feed themselves ; this is true, and it is the reason why the parents feed them and why their instinct is undeveloped. But many other birds, fowls, for instance, run about directly they are out of the egg and pick up food for themselves; here the food-seeking in- stinct is unimpaired. One of the most remarkable cases of degeneration of the food-seeking instinct is found in certain ants. It has been known ever since the beginning of this century that some species of ants keep slaves, for instance, the reddish ant found in the meadows of Switzerland and Alsace (Polyergus rufescens). It is not a large but a strong species, which has adopted the 26 RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. (IX. habit of sallying forth in troops from time to time, to make raids upon and plunder the nests of some weaker species, such as the common Formica fusca. The object is, however, not to destroy or devour the ants they attack, but merely to carry off the pupae to their own nest, where they receive every care: the workers hatched from them are then employed as servants, or, to use the usual term, as slaves. These slaves, fulfil all the duties of the nest, which would otherwise have fallen to the share of the red workers; they feed the larvae, build galleries and chambers, bring in food-supplies, and even feed their lazy masters! This is no fable, as was once thought, but an ascertained fact, proved to be such early in this century by Huber of Geneva, a celebrated observer of ants, and since fully confirmed by his pupil and successor Auguste Forel, as well as by Sir John Lubbock. I have also convinced myself of the truth of the assertion. | The most curious part of it, however, is that, in consequence of being constantly fed by their slaves, the red ants have entirely forgotten how to procure food for themselves. If they are shut up and supplied with honey, which is their favourite food, they will not touch it, but will suffer hunger, become weak and feeble, and ultimately die of starvation, unless pity is taken upon them and they are given one of their dusky slaves. Directly this is done, the slave falls to work, eats a quantity of the honey, and then proceeds to feed its masters, which are perfectly willing to be saved from starvation in this manner. Here, then, as in the case of nestlings, the food-seeking instinct and the power of distinguishing food by sight have degenerated, and clearly in consequence of disuse.- Inasmuch as a colony of red ants always owns plenty of slaves, the food-seeking instinct has become unnecessary, natural selection has ceased to affect it, and it has gradually died out. Other instincts too have been lost by these red ants in consequence of their habit of keeping slaves; they have quite forgotten the art of nest-building and in part that of tending their young. Other species of ants devote much attention to their pupae, moving them about the nest from time to time, and often carrying them out into the air and sun, and they feed their larvae with the greatest assiduity. But the red slave-making IX.] RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. 27 ants have no such instincts; they care nothing for their own young, and the species would become extinct, if they were suddenly deprived of their slaves. So it is not only among men, that there is a curse upon slavery; even animals become degraded by it. Other species of slave-making ants are known, and have been carefully studied, in which the degeneration of the masters goes even farther and affects their physical strength. But so much remains unexplained in the life-history of these species, that I will not treat of them here, remarkable as are the obser- vations which have been made about them. All these examples afford further support to our theory of retrogressive develop- ment as a result of disuse; for the above-mentioned cases of the degeneration of instinct took place in worker-ants, i.e. in animals which have not the power of propagating their species. Hence the disappearance of the instincts in question cannot be due to the hereditary transmission of any degeneration acquired by individuals in consequence of the fact that they were not required to seek their own living. In the cases above quoted, the instinct of feeding has not entirely degenerated, but only a part of it has been lost, viz. the instinct of seeking food and the power of recognizing it by sight. Evidence is, however, forthcoming to show that the whole instinct of feeding is sometimes lost, so that actually no hunger is felt and no nourishment taken. This may sound very strange, but it is an undoubted fact that there are animals which absorb as much nourishment in the larval stage as will last them during the rest of their life. Many moths, especially among the Bombyces, possess yery degenerate mouth-organs, and so do the ELphemeridae: all these take no sort of food. In male Rotifers the alimentary canal is entirely wanting ; they have neither mouth, stomach, nor intestine ; their lives are of such short duration that the food material with which they begin life is sufficient to sustain them throughout it. There is no luxury in nature; no instinct and no organ in the body can persist unless absolutely essential to the life of the species. Panmixia—in other words, the cessation of the opera- tion of natural selection—removes all that is superfluous, only leaving that which is absolutely necessary. But, of course, if our theory. be the right one, such retro- 28 RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. [IX. gressive development can only take place very gradually: it must require many generations to completely eliminate what is superfluous, and we should expect to find in many animals vestiges of organs and structures once significant, but now on the road to complete obliteration. And this is actually the case, as I have shown above. So-called ‘rudimentary’ organs are present in numberless cases, and in various animals, and give us some idea of the vast amount of change which every species must have undergone in the course of ages. Of such a kind are degenerate eyes, hidden beneath the skin, as in the Proteus, the golden mole, and the Caecilia; the rudimentary wings of the Kiwi, and of many female moths the males of which have well- developed wings; the almost invisible projections near the mouth of the Ephemeridae, which are nothing less than degene- rate jaws; and athousand other examples. To the same causes are due the numerous cases in which an organ, fully developed in the ancestors, is wanting in the adult descendant, although present in a rudimentary condition during youth or embryonic life. Thus,the workers of ants are, as before mentioned, wing- less, but the vestiges of wings are still to be seen in the larvae, in the form of small disc-like objects beneath the skin, which subsequently disappear. Thus, too, the larvae of bees have lost their legs, because they do not need to crawl about, but live enclosed in a waxen cell in close proximity to their food: although disuse has thus brought them to the condition of foot- less grubs, in the egg they nevertheless still exhibit vestiges of the legs which their saw-fly-like ancestors must have possessed. Examples like these show that retrogression in an organ, which degenerates from disuse,takes place first in the mature stage,and does not extend to the embryonic stages until much later. An organ may persist in the embryo for thousands of generations after it has been eliminated from the adult organization. The history of evolution affords many well-authenticated instances of organs which persist in a rudimentary condition and never attain a higher development. They are, of course, of the greatest importance as throwing light upon the past history of a species, and are in themselves sufficient proof of the number and diversity of the ancestors of existing species; they show us how intricate and devious are the workings of nature in the evolution of the organic world—now progressive, now retro- IX.] RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. 29 gressive, now concerned with the development of a single structure, and now of a whole organism. Everything that nature has built up with such elaborate care—highly-developed organs of locomotion, limbs fitted to support a certain weight, joints with their complex and yet easy movements, the exquisite balance of muscular strength required for rapid motion on the ground, wings adapted for flying, with all the marvellously adjusted organs which overcome gravity and render rising into the air a possibility, every one of the adaptations by which animals are placed in communication with the outer world which surrounds them,—eyes of the most delicate and complex structure, organs of hearing and smell so wonderfully formed that it has needed long years of the combined researches of all the most eminent naturalists to understand their full signi- ficance—each one of these is relinquished, is handed over to a process of gradual destruction, the moment it ceases to be essential to the life of the species. It would indeed seem as if such a process of development could not justly be called progress, and as far as the individual organ undergoing degeneration is concerned the process is of course retrogressive; but the case becomes different when we regard the organism as a whole. For the end and purpose of all living beings is after all but the existence of each individual : the form assumed, the complexity of structure, the degree of perfection, are all quite immaterial provided that the species be fit to survive : less than fit it cannot be, or it succumbs, neither can it be more so, because no means exist which can enable it to rise beyond the point of fitness necessary for survival. Schopenhauer’s pessimistic view that the world was as bad as it could be, and that, if it could grow in the least degree worse, it would be annihilated altogether, might be reversed and con- verted into an optimistic one: for it would be equally true to say that the world is as excellent as it is possible to make it with the given materials, and that a nearer approach to absolute perfection is inconceivable. The organic world teaches us that such is the case; each existing species shows the purpose of its being in every detail of its structure, and in its perfect adaptation to the conditions under which it lives. But it is only adapted so far as is actually necessary, only so far as to make it fittest to survive, and not a step further. The eye of 30 RETROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN NATURE. (IX. the frog is but an imperfect organ of vision as compared with the eye of the falcon, or that of man, but it is perfect enough to enable it to see the crawling fly or the writhing worm: it suffices for the needs of the species. Even the eye of the falcon is not absolutely perfect as an organ of vision from a purely optical point of view, but it serves to enable the bird to distinguish its prey with certainty from a great height: such a pitch of perfection is all that is essential for the life of the species, and all possibility of higher development of the eye, by means of natural selection, is therefore precluded. The object of all evolution, viz. the survival of the fittest, is not, however, always and only attained by the ever-improving, progressive development of the organism as a whole, or of particular organs: new possessions are not invariably added to the old, but the latter are often rendered superfluous in the course of time and taken away. Nor does this happen in an ideally perfect way, suddenly, as if by magic, but slowly, in accordance with existing laws, so that the process remains uncompleted through long ages. But ultimately the organ which is no longer essential to life is done away with altogether, and the balance between the structure of the body and its functions is restored, so that, in this sense also, retrogression may in truth be said to be a part of progress. De Thoughts upon the Musical Sense in Animals and Man. 1889. From the ‘Deutsche Rundschau,’ October, 1889. ae mMAOUGHTS. UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE IN ANIMALS AND MAN. Mopern biology depends, as everyone knows, upon the hypothesis of a gradual transformation of all forms of life— the hypothesis of the origin of species by the slow process of evolution, not by a sudden act of creation. Furthermore, most people are aware that biological science holds the chief agent of this transformation to be the principle of natural selection, discovered by Charles Darwin and Alfred Russell Wallace. Out of the vast number of offspring born into the world in each generation, only a very small fraction can survive long enough to become the parents of the succeeding genera- tion; the rest perish from the attacks of enemies, from the inclemency of weather, from hunger or thirst,—in short, they succumb in the struggle for existence. No two individuals are exactly alike, but every one differs in certain respects from all the others: such differences sometimes increase, sometimes diminish the power to succeed in the struggle for life. Those individuals which possess an increased power of resistance will, as a rule, survive and produce offspring, whether their advantage be due to greater muscular strength, keener senses, thicker fur, greater speed or power of flight, &c. This selective process being repeated in each generation, so that only those individuals which possess qualities the most helpful in the struggle for life, are enabled to become the parents of off- spring, it follows that such qualities will gradually spread over all the individuals which make up the species and will grow until they have attained the highest perfection. VOL. Il. D 34 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE [X. In this way is explained the evolution of every useful quality and the adaptation which is so manifest in all living beings. It is, however, very probable that the animal world is also subject to a selective process of another kind,—the sexual selection of Charles Darwin. I will devote a few words to this principle, inasmuch as our main subject is immediately connected with it. We are all familiar with the song of the grasshopper and cricket. If one walks in the meadows along a little brook on a fine June evening, he will often hear a long-sustained note, even, subdued, and pleasant, which vibrates powerfully without swelling or diminishing, somewhat like that of the nightingale in Haydn’s ‘Toy Symphony.’ A cautious approach will enable us to see a mole-cricket sitting, apparently motion- less, in front of its hole in the ground. More careful examina- tion proves that the short wing-covers are in a state of continual vibration, producing friction as they move; and this it is which causes the sound. The microscope shows that minute and delicate teeth are placed at regular intervals along a vein on one of the wing-covers ; when these are struck at a certain rate by a vein on the other wing, they emit a whirring note of a definite pitch. One vein acts as the bow, the other as the string of a violin; the mole-cricket is a violinist, and can there- fore hold on its note as long as it will. It is evident that the power of producing a song can be of no value to these animals in the struggle for existence. It neither helps them to find food, nor defends them from their enemies; it is therefore impossible that it can have arisen by the opera- tion of natural selection. Furthermore, when we enquire into its mode of origin we must take into account the fact that only the males possess the gift of song. This is also true of all other singing insects, such for instance as grasshoppers. The ancient Greeks were aware of this, for Xenarchus, in one of his comedies, says, ‘Are not the cicadas happy, whose wives have not got an atom of voice’.’ Here then we find the solution of the problem; the origin of the sound-producing apparatus receives a simple explanation in the contest between the males for the possession of the females. If we take it for granted that the females are pleased 1 Hiv’ eiaiv of TérTvyes ovk EvdaipoveEs *Qy Tals yuvargiy ovS’ drLovy paris EX 5 x) IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 35 by the song—and this may be accepted as proved,—we can understand the development of an at first imperfect musical apparatus out of the primitive veins of the wing, and its gradual improvement up to its present condition. The females must, at all times, have preferred the males that sang the best: this being the case, according to the law of heredity, the best developed apparatus was, in each generation, transmitted to the males of the next, so that a gradual improvement in the power of performance must have taken place. The continued preference for the best singers necessarily led to improvement in song and in the sound-producing organ, until the latter became incapable of further improvement. Let us now briefly consider the song of birds. Here, too, the power of song is possessed by the males alone, and its origin cannot be explained by natural selection, inasmuch as it does not help in the preservation of the species, but is rather disadvantageous, for it betrays the presence of the little creatures to their enemies at a distance. But it can be well explained by sexual selection. The males that sang the best being always preferred by the females, we can understand how out of the primitive chirp a kind of song arose in the course of generations, and how, in certain species, it became more and more complex, until at length it developed into songs which delight even man by their beauty, such as those of the linnet, the blackbird, and the nightingale. Hence sexual selection affords a sufficient explanation of the origin of song in birds and insects. But how can man have acquired the power of making and understanding music, and how can we conceive of the agents by which such a faculty has been developed? Can these agents be found in the processes of natural and of sexual selection? Undoubtedly man is as completely subser- vient to the influence of natural selection as any other animal or plant. Man, like every other organism, is variable, is bound by the laws of heredity, and wages a constant struggle for existence. Therefore, with him as with them the qualities which aid in that struggle will be retained and improved, while those which are disadvantageous will be lost. And this 7s natural selection. It is impossible to doubt that the intelligence of the human D2 36 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE [X. species has been largely increased since the days of primitive man. Intelligence is man’s chief weapon,—a weapon which must have been as important for his existence as physical qualities, and this too even in the most primitive times. Think, for instance, of a race that depends solely upon the products of the chase. In such a case, not only are keen senses and bodily strength and endurance essential for the existence of the individual, but he also needs intelligence, cunning, and astuteness in hunting game; boldness and the gift of working in combination in conquering enemies; wise foresight in pre- venting starvation during unfavourable seasons. Any improve- ment in these qualities must have given the possessor a greater chance of survival and of leaving offspring. Hence these beneficial attributes would be slowly intensified in the course of generations: the average degree of intelligence would con- tinue to increase so long as the difference between life and death, between failure and success in begetting offspring, was determined by its means. There can be no reason why this gradual increase in the human intellect should not be going on at the present day: it would at least be difficult to bring forward conclusive argu- ments against such an opinion. It must be granted that, even under the conditions imposed by modern civilization, the highly intelligent man, in any calling, has, ceferis paribus, more chance of founding a family than one with less intelligence. If this be true, although only when large numbers are con- sidered, it must also follow that the average of very many cases would show that the mental power of man is increasing, although very gradually. It is quite true that we fail to detect any historical evidence of this progress, when, for instance, we compare the Greek and Latin poets and philosophers with those of our own day. But this fact does not conflict with the argument, for the leading nations of the present day are not descended from the ancient Greeks. The development of mankind does not proceed along a straight road, but a very interrupted one. The intellectual achievements of the ancient Greeks did not pass into their descendants, but into the Romano-germanic nations, and these only received the intel- lectual achievement, and not the intellectual power. It is also to be noted that an increase in the intelligence of mankind may X.] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 37 not only take place by a rise in the greatest heights attained by human intellect, but also by a rise in the general average. We will now leave this aspect of our subject: my object was merely to show that the human intellect must have been im- proved during many thousands of generations by the process of selection, and this can hardly be doubted. A very different answer must be given if we ask whether it is possible to conceive of a similar origin for every kind ot talent and faculty possessed by civilized man, if we enquire whether the musical, artistic, poetic, and mathematical talents can have originated in a similar process of selection. It is clear that they did not arise in this way. Such talents may, now and then, have been useful or even of decisive importance in the struggle for existence, but as a rule they are not so. And no one will be prepared to assert that musical or poetic gifts mean an unusually good chance of founding a family, although this is perhaps more nearly true to-day than it was in the times of Schiller, Haydn, and Mozart, or still earlier. But even to-day the man with a practical turn of mind stands a greater chance of material success than one whose talents are of a more visionary kind. Talents for music, art, poetry, and mathematics do not contribute towards the preservation of the human species, and therefore they cannot have arisen by the operation of natural selection. Perhaps, however, the development of the musical sense in man depends on sexual selection, as we have seen that it does in insects and birds. Darwin held this view; he supposed that the primitive song of man originated in courtship. I am doubtful whether this opinion can be sustained, but the point will be referred to further on. If, however, the theory be accepted, if we admit that sexual selection played a decisive part in the first development of human song, even then we have gained very little as an explanation of the origin of our own music, because sexual selection is insufficient to explain the immense growth which must have taken place in the musical sense since the earliest times, if we admit its existence in primitive man. We might perhaps be inclined to maintain that such a growth of the musical sense has actually occurred, when, without referring to primitive man, we simply compare the 38 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE [X. music of the savage with the highest achievements of our own art. When Europeans first visited the islands of the Pacific, all the natives were found to practise some sort of music. The song of the New Zealanders made a profound impression upon Cook, and Chamisso found the song of the Hawaians and Tzhit ans extremely pleasant, although often accompanied by an orchestra of noisy instruments, such as drums, hollow tubes which were struck violently against the ground, and wooden sticks which were knocked together. The ‘music’ was confined within the limits of a very few notes, lying between E and G (or, in the case of Tahiti, between C and F), although, at the same time, not only semitones but quarter-tones (or ‘semi-semitones’) were employed. The song was pure, and when a hundred sang together, the sound was like that of a single voice. In spite of the limited compass of their scale, they had a rather large repertory of different melodies and themes, which however were always characterized by monotony and unceasing repetition : some of these were used as the accompaniment of work, others for rowing, dancing, marching to battle, and mourning the dead. We must however remember that the Polynesians are not in a very low state of civilization. Their poetry is by itself suffi- cient to prove this, for it is full of feeling and abounds in beautiful similes. Hence we can scarcely look upon their music as primitive if this expression implies the lowest form of musical art. And yet, what an enormous difference, when we compare this with one of the great musical works of our own time, such as Bach’s Passion music in all its depth and magnificence, Mozart’s G-minor Symphony, or one of the nine ‘ Revelations’ (so to name them) of Beethoven. One would almost hesitate to apply the term ‘music’ to the primitive successions of notes made use of by ‘savages,’ so monstrous does the difference between the two entities appear. Yet our own music must have developed itself from similar beginnings,—there is no other way. And, in fact, we find similar elements in both; notes of definite pitch, separated by definite intervals and held for diverse lengths of time, that is to say, distinguished by differences of rhythm. So that, in this manner, we arrive x] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 39 at the musical theme, the melody, the groundwork of all music. Even in its savage form music becomes, to a certain extent, the expression of emotion. The funeral dirge is very different from the war-song or the festal song. Of course such melodies are very far from attaining the marvellous precision with which the highest music can not only excite the whole range of human feeling, but can also represent every emotion just as a drawing represents form. And music can achieve this with such fine shades of expression that language is by no means its equal. Disregarding for the present those highly gifted minds that created such music, and only considering those which enjoy it, it is clear that even for the mere understanding, viz. the appreciative enjoyment, of one of our great performances, there is required a far higher musical sense than is necessary for the comprehension of the monotonous song of a negro tribe, or a simple Chinese melody, or one of those melodies in octaves which played so prominent a part with the ancient Greeks. In order to hear in a symphony of Beethoven or in Bach’s Mass in B-minor anything more than a mere confusion of notes, or a roaring, heaving ocean of sound, demands a highly developed musical intelligence. Considering these facts, the assumption seems at first almost unavoidable that musical talent in man has gradually increased from the condition found in the Polynesians up to the level reached by the most civilized nations; and if for the moment we adopt the Darwinian hypothesis as to the origin of human music, it is clear that the amount of increase which has taken place during this rise from the condition met with in the living savage ought to be sensibly greater than that which took place during the development of primitive man into the living savage. It is at any rate certain that the amount of increase in the musical art itself has been far greater during the second period of its development than it can have been during the first. Hence we are led back to the question with which we started, viz. how and by what means can this increased refinement and growth of the musical talent have been produced? Sexual selection cannot possibly afford the required explana- tion, even if we admit that it played a part in the origin of the primitive song of ancestral man. It is not only true to-day 40 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE [X. but has been true from times immemorial, that the choice of © husband and of wife are determined by qualities other than musical gifts, viz. by youth, beauty, strength, and not least by mental endowments, not to speak of the various external inducements which are always apt to intervene. No one will be prepared to maintain that men who cannot sing and lack any remarkable musical talent, are or ever were at a disadvantage in gaining wives. On the contrary, we know that such men have no difficulty in finding unmusical partners, and indeed that they not uncommonly marry those in whom this taste is strongly marked. If this be so any increase of the musical talent by means of sexual selection is rendered impossible. I feel sure that many will at this point inquire whether it is impossible for musical talent to have grown in exact proportion to its exercise. We are all familiar with the fact that by constant practice every organ is improved and its power increased. We cannot doubt this when we think of the marvellous delicacy of touch acquired by the finger-tips of a blind man who attempts to make up for the loss of vision by means of the tactile sense. Why then should not the musical sense have been increased during the course of unnumbered generations in each one of which the mind and ear were exercised in the composition of music and in its enjoyment? And such exercise appears to have actually taken place, for, as far as we are aware, nearly all savage nations, not only the Polynesians, but the American Indians, negroes, and Asiatic tribes,—possess some sort of musical utterance. This explanation would certainly be a very simple one, and it would be equally useful in many other directions, provided only that it were the true one. Up tothe present time it has been regarded as valid, and many, even now, consider it to be so. But the explanation before us involves a supposition which a close examination does not allow us to admit,—the supposition that those modifications of an organ which are due to its exercise during the individual life can be transmitted to off- spring. The supposed increase of the musical sense in the course of generations can only have occurred in the manner suggested, provided that this supposition be granted. If how- ever the results of practice cannot be handed down it is clear that the increase of the sense starts in the descendant at the X.] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 41 very point at which it began in the parent, so that growth in the former can only reach as far as it did in the first ancestor, and this in spite of practice continued through any number of generations. The amount of improvement possible in a life-time is very limited. No athlete can by any amount of practice lift a weight of a hundred or even one of twenty hundredweight, although he may be able to raise three or four. And, if our views on heredity be correct, the son of an athlete will have to start at the point at which his father started. For the son, if indeed he inherits his father’s gifts, inherits only those with which his father came into the world and not any increase which they may have undergone during his lifetime. Un- limited training therefore will only enable the son to lift a weight of three or four hundredweight. : Biological science asserts, with ever increasing clearness, that there is absolutely no evidence for the assumption until recently so generally received, that acquired characters can be transmitted. It was believed that mutilations were occasionally inherited, but a searching examination has shown that the evidence brought forward will not stand the test of criticism. The results of certain recent experiments, in which the tails of mice were amputated, showed that the offspring, although examined in many hundreds of cases, were invariably normal’. We are therefore compelled to abandon this hypothesis of the transmission of acquired characters, at any rate until it has been supported in some other way. We lose with this view a very convenient principle of explanation, and we must there- fore attempt to understand the phenomena without its aid. The question before us is :—How is it possible that such an increase in the musical sense took place as seems necessary to have raised it from the condition met with in the savage up to that found among civilized races at the present day? When we examine this question we are led to inquire whether it is correct to assume that any increase in musical talent has, as a matter of fact, taken place in the course of ages. That such an increase has occurred appears to be a matter of course; for how could our highly developed music have arisen unless the musical organ had previously become more efficient ? 1 See Vol. I. pp. 444, 445. 42 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE [x. Let us however consider the converse question :—Js it the case that highly developed music must appear when high musical talent exists? Let us suppose for instance that a child endowed with the talent of a Mozart were born among some savage nation such as the Samoans before they were influenced by European civilization. Would such a child, after reaching maturity, compose stringed quartettes and symphonies ? Certainly not. If the Samoans possessed the songs which they have to-day, our aboriginal Mozart must soon have known them all by heart and would have composed new ones. Perhaps, being such a unique genius, he might have produced a great musical reform, introducing changes of a revolutionary character and raising Samoan music to a higher stage. But he would not have raised it to the modern symphony. In order to attain such a height he would have been obliged first to invent the musical notation, and then, rising higher, to pass through polyphonic music, until at last he reached the com- mencements of that harmonized music to which symphony belongs. The greatest change that he could have introduced would have been an extension of the scale from three or four whole tones to seven, and in association with this, the composi- tion of more elaborately constructed melodies, or at the utmost the invention of music in two parts, which is known to have taken place comparatively recently, viz. in the times of the Troubadours. It would have been as impossible for the Samoan Mozart to compose symphonies as for one of the great men of science of ancient Greece, such as Archimedes, to invent the modern dynamo as used for the transmission of energy or for electric lighting. To be enabled to construct such a machine, he would have had to work his way through more inventions and discoveries than could have been made during the life-time of the greatest genius who has ever lived. For in ancient times nothing was known of electricity except that amber (electron) when rubbed attracted little pieces of paper. Before a man could arrive at the knowledge by which he could construct a fixed electro-magnet in such a manner as to produce currents in a rotating coil, many other discoveries in physics had first to be made, the investigations of Gray, Dufay, Kleist, Franklin, and others were necessary, Galvani and Volta had to discover X.] e IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 43 the electric current, Oerstedt electro-magnetism, while it was necessary for Seebeck, Ampére, and Faraday to base upon this still further discoveries. In like manner most of these dis- coveries had to be made before first Soemmering and then Gauss and Weber could use the electric current for signalling at a distance; and even then a whole series of practical improvements in telegraphy necessarily preceded Hughes’ printing telegraph. One discovery is ever built upon another; and the history of music is not less a history of inventions than that of the electric telegraph. It is therefore impossible for even the greatest genius to pass directly from simple melody to symphony. I should like to suggest the further question whether it is quite certain that Mozarts could not have existed in ancient times; in other words, whether the supposed increase in musical talent has in reality taken place as a historical fact, or whether the talent was not inherent in man from the begin- ning, while its expression, i.e. music itself, has undergone progressive increase and development. At first sight the question may appear to be very strange ; but I believe that it is perfectly justifiable. Indeed I am of the opinion that the suggestion implied in the question is entirely valid. I have shown that from the mere fact that symphonies are not composed by savages, we are not entitled to conclude that Mozarts have not existed among them; or, to put it still more clearly, we are not entitled without further proof to infer that savages never possess high musical talents because their music is but lowly developed. Such talent might very well exist, but could not produce any marked effect, because of the low level attained by the musical environment. I am satisfied by the proof afforded by numerous facts that this is really the case, and that therefore the high musical talent which is more or less possessed by civilized man at the present time, does not depend upon a gradual increase in the musical sense, and that such increase being non-existent does not require explanation. No such rise and increase of the musical faculty by itself has taken place. The musical sense is rather an ancient possession of mankind chiefly depending upon the highly developed auditory organ, and this was transferred to man from his animal ancestors and has not 44 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE B.@ increased at any rate beyond the condition reached by the lowest of existing savages. We have definite proofs of the occurrence among savages of musical talent capable of the same education as our own. We must therefore consider their talent to be as high as ours, although it is generally hidden because untrained during the life-time of its possessor. Negro races are certainly not at a very high stage of civili- zation. We see this clearly by their utter carelessness of human life, as shown in the dreadful massacres of the King of Dahomey and other chiefs, by the state of servitude to which women are subjected, and by the lack of real family life. But in spite of these proofs of inferiority it has happened on many ~ occasions that negroes have attained to the full understanding of our highest music. Brindis y Salas, a Cuban negro, who travelled as a violinist through Europe and America, is a well-known proof of this. He was not merely endowed with excellence of ‘technique’ along with delicacy of ear, but—as I am told by a distinguished musician '—‘he possessed musical abilities of a very high order. His playing was that of an artist... He must therefore have had an inborn musical sense, as high in all essentials as that of our greatest performers. It is impossible to urge the objec- tion that his ancestors had been under European influence for centuries, because such a period of time would be far too short for the growth of a special part of the brain as the result of inherited practice, and also because European music of a high order does not reach the negroes of Cuba. Another example is afforded by the ‘Jubilee Singers,’ a company of negro men and women, who in 1887 astonished Europe by their ‘very extraordinary performances in four-part singing.’ The authority, whose opinion I have already quoted, judges from their performances that there is no doubt whatever as to ‘the talent of the negro nation for our music.’ We also find among European musicians and composers many grounds for the belief that musical talent has not been increased by practice in the course of civizilation. If this were the case, highly gifted musicians would never have arisen in families living, remote from the great influences of their 1 This information was kindly placed at my disposal by Herr Otto Lessmann, of Berlin, editor of the ‘ Allgemeine Musikzeitung.’ x. ] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 45 time, in places where the only music consisted of national songs accompanied by the guitar or the zither. But, not un- commonly, from these very surroundings have come men with a highly developed musical sense, and even celebrated composers. Martin Luther, who is known to have been a composer, was the son of a poor miner. Palestrina was the son of a peasant. Jacob Callwitz, a_ sixteenth century composer, was the son of a labourer, and Joseph Fux, who composed in the seventeenth century, was the son of a Styrian peasant. Cimarosa was the son of a washerwoman near Naples: John Gottlieb Naumann, a renowned composer of the - eighteenth century, was of peasant extraction, as also was Joachim Quanz. The first known ancestor of the Bach family was born in 1550, in the country near Gotha, and worked all his life as a miller in-Wechmar, his native place. Joseph Haydn was also born in a village, and was the son of a poor wheel- wright. In these instances we cannot maintain that all this musical genius sprang out of the earth suddenly and without prepara- tion. On the contrary, I wish to point, for example, to Haydn, whose parents we certainly know to have been musical. They sang when they rested from work, and the father accompanied on the harp. The above-mentioned founder of the Bachs also frequently played on the cythringen, a kind of guitar, which he brought home to the mill from his travels. Sebastian Bach says that ‘this was, as it were, the beginning of the music of his descendants.’ The highest musical culture of their time was entirely without influence on the musical sense of the ancestors of these two great musicians; the talent existed nevertheless, and appeared in the descendants, sometimes to an increased and sometimes to a diminished extent. It is no real objection to this argument to urge that only a few out of the large number of musicians in recent centuries came from the lower orders. A great musician not only needs the highest talent, but also stimulus and all the culture that his times can bestow. I previously assumed that the invention of two-part singing would be the highest achievement possible for our supposed Samoan Mozart, and we may safely con- clude that Joseph Haydn would never have surpassed his father’s national songs and harp had he not chanced to become 46 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE [X. a chorister in the little town of Hainburg, and had he not after- wards entered the music-school in Vienna, of which Reutter, the organist of the cathedral, was the head. Haydn possessed musical talent of the highest order, but had it not been trained, he could never have accomplished by himself the whole deve- lopment of modern music from the national song; he could never have risen from the music of his parents to oratorios and stringed quartettes. Such cases afford interesting evidence that at least a great part of the development of modern music can be accomplished_in a lifetime, even when all the ancestors have been strangers to the higher musical culture, so that it was impossible for their musical sense to be raised by it. The musical sense is evidently innate in the human brain, and is independent of all training and practice undergone by ances- tors. The predisposition may be strong or feeble, but even the greatest talent does not enable the possessor to climb to the height reached by the music of his time without being raised by instruction. That so great a height can be reached in a life-time by the son of a German peasant, or even by the offspring of a savage race, evidently proves that the musical sense of to-day has been inherent in man since times imme- morial, and that it has not been increased by the development of music or by practice. It has nevertheless been brought to a higher stage of development in the most civilized races, as we shall see further on. We have already seen that musical talent exists in every stratum of society. And yet the upper classes have produced many more eminent musicians than the lower, a fact which we can easily understand when we remember that without early stimulus, and the constant opportunity of hearing and being instructed in the highest music, even the greatest genius must remain undeveloped or, as we may say, latent. This is proved by many examples: thus out of sixteen renowned German musicians of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, no fewer than eight were the sons of organists: the others were the sons of peasants and labourers, but nearly all were choristers when boys. Furthermore, twenty-seven of the greatest German and Italian composers of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries were the sons of musicians. Ex- amples of these are afforded by Mozart, Beethoven, Weber, x. | IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 47 Hummel, Cramer, Abt Vogler, Hasse, Johannes Brahms, Robert Volkmann, Czerny, Karl Reinecke, Cherubini, Bellini, Rossini, Antonio Lotti, and Scarlatti. In all these cases it is clear that a highly-developed musical sense was transmitted from father to son, while the talent of the latter was further developed than that of the father, because it was trained and exercised from earliest youth, although I do not mean to imply that it was not also greater from the very beginning. But the greater force of the inherited talent does not depend upon the weaker talent of the father having been improved by practice during his life-time. Many still believe in the hereditary transmission of improvement acquired by practice; but if such inheritance could take place so rapidly, in a single generation, we should easily find proofs of it in many occupations and pursuits—proofs which are as yet entirely wanting. I shall, however, be asked: Whence came the increase in the talent of Mozart and Beethoven as contrasted with that of their fathers? It is impossible to give any definite answer to this question, but I can, perhaps, indicate it by another ques- tion: Whence came the high poetic genius of Goethe, whose father had no taste for poetry, while his mother without ever having written, exhibited, in her whole character, the most distinct endowments in this direction? How could the poetic genius of the mother, which had never been exercised, attain so high a level in the son? We must not forget that poetic talent is by no means a simple power but a very complex one, depending on a happy combination of many intellectual and emotional gifts, which in Goethe’s case were derived, as he himself tells us, partly from the father and partly from the mother. ‘Vom Vater hab’ ich die Statur, Des Lebens ernstes Fiihren; Vom Miitterchen die Frohnatur, Die Lust zum Fabuliren,’ &c. Similarly, I,should be inclined to explain the genius of Mozart as a very complex power made up of the fine ear, the strength of will and energy of his father, and the bright and cheerful disposition, the gentleness and refinement of feeling of his mother. From this constitution may have arisen the infinite flexibility of that wonderful mind which, with unwearied 48 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE [X. activity, ever led to fresh combinations of the emotions which became the subjects of musical themes. A psychologist might be able to show us more of the constitution of this marvellous mind. I will not attempt it; I merely wish to show that the increase in the musical faculty, which appears to pass from father to son, can be explained, as in so many other cases, entirely without the unproved assumption of the inherited effects of practice. Even when the musical sense itself is transmitted unaltered, viz. without increase, from father to son, a considerable increase in the power of composition may nevertheless be brought about by the combination of mental gifts derived from the mother with the musical sense inherited from the father; and this sense will therefore gain in the son a higher expression. There are many highly-gifted people who are unable to compose anything original: even remark- able musical talent may co-exist with an utter inability to produce anything new. Examples of this are perfectly familiar. But in the descendant of such person, the strong receptive musical talent may be united to such a complete flexibility of the mind and temperament, derived from the mother, that new combinations of ideas will ever arise. This latter gift will then seize upon the musical sense, and ideas which were perhaps of an entirely different nature in the mother, will become musical ideas in the son. The composer not only needs the musical faculty, the gift of originality is also indispensable. I believe that an increase in the genius for music which passes from father to son depends upon a new combination of mental gifts, with which of course an increase in the delicacy of the musical ear itself may be united ; for every inherited quality varies, and may be feebler or stronger than it was in the parent. Let us now return to the argument that some external stimulus is necessary for the development of an existing musical faculty. Two facts seem to me to favour this opinion ; first, that nearly all the renowned composers and singers of the present century have come from large towns, and have thus been brought up where from earliest youth they have been subject to musical influences of all kinds. I have made a list of ninety-eight such cases. Secondly, the fact that during the nineteenth century the Jewish race first began to take part in x.] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 49 the development of music. In this century composers of Jewish descent first begin to appear, and among them we find very great names, such as Meyerbeer, Mendelssohn, Halévy, Rubinstein, Moscheles, Félicien David, and others. This fact is probably associated with the emancipation of the Jews, which afforded them the opportunity of developing the rich musical faculty which they possessed by nature. In this we find a further proof that it is impossible for the musical sense of modern nations to have been raised by practice during earlier centuries; for the Jews were entirely without adequate musical training, so long as all the higher music was bound up with religious service. The introduction of music into the Jewish synagogue is of quite modern date. Throughout the eighteen centuries preceding our own, music had played no part in Jewish life, and yet this nation possessed the musical faculty in a very high degree, and as soon as the Jews began to cultivate their talent they were not only able to reach the summit of modern musical achievement, but also to contribute towards the progress of the art. This is certainly clear evidence for the hypothesis that the musical faculty has been latent in mankind from times immemorial, at least in many races, and that it can be evoked at any time and raised to any height. But if the mental instrument with which we make—I mean invent and enjoy—music, existed at all times, why did not man perform symphonies and oratorios in the age of the Pharaohs? The answer is clear—Because music 1s an invention, and one which could reach its present height only very slowly in the course of centuries. And here we meet with the great differ- ence between man and animals. Man possesses a ¢radition ; he improves and perfects his performances by passing on the gains of each generation to those which follow. The higher animals are not entirely devoid of the power of learning from preceding generations, but they possess it in a much lower degree. A young goldfinch, when brought up by hand, sings untaught the song of its kind, but not so perfectly as when it has had an accomplished songster for its teacher. It also learns by tradition, but the essential basis of the song was present in its organization beforehand, and is inherent. The bird speaks, even when untaught, the language of its species. VOL. II. E 50 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE (a Sexual selection, as we may suppose, has made this language an essential part of its being. It is otherwise with man: his language does not exist as a perfected faculty, as a part of his physical nature; but only as a possible expression of it which only becomes actual when the individual preserves communication with those who preceded him, viz. when he is taught to speak. Hence it is that every human child can learn any language: hence it is that there is not one single human language but hundreds of them, each of which has had its own developmental history—its origin, climax, and decline. Each of these different modes of expres- sion of the human mind seems, as it were, a distinct mental entity, independent of the individual, and possessing its own history. And this is not only true of language, but also of the arts and sciences. Not one of these could have existed had not man possessed that advantage over animals which enables him to transmit the knowledge he has gained to his descendants, so that these latter are benefited by building, from the very first, upon the high level reached by previous generations, from which they can rise still higher. All this is far from new: it has long been known that the chief difference between man and animals consists in the fact that man is capable of mental development while animals are not. But I doubt whether the exact difference has ever been clearly conceived. The statement just made is not a satis- factory expression of it; for common knowledge of the day asserts that animals are certainly capable of development although in a sense entirely different from that which is intended above. We have every reason for the belief that the unceasing transformation of species which took place during the earlier epochs of the world’s history, is also proceeding to- day—that to-day, wherever circumstances are favourable, the transformation of species is taking place, although slowly and insensibly. But such a process of development of one species of animal into a new one, even when combined with an improvement and increase in efficiency, is entirely different from what we mean by the development of mankind. The development of animals transforms one species into another and changes the physical nature: but what we generally understand by the intellectual development of man- X.] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 51 kind by no means necessarily entails any physical alteration even in the brain itself: it is indeed quite independent of any such change. Such development represents an increase in the intellectual acquirements of mankind as a whole: this is the origin of civilization, using the term in its widest sense and applying it to all the numberless directions taken by civilizing forces’. Man, availing himself of tradition, is able, in every part of the intellectual domain, to seize upon the acquirements of his ancestors at the point where they left them, and to pursue them further, finally himself leaving the results of his own experience and the knowledge acquired during his life- time to his descendants, that they may carry on the same process. This method of progress is most clearly shown in the history of science, and especially in that of natural science, which deals with an immense number of facts and experiences which have been very slowly acquired, collected, and transmitted to descendants during many centuries of civilization ; and in this way alone could the present state of our knowledge have been reached. The human being of to-day can be easily raised, by a short period of training, to this stage from which, if he be successful, he may perhaps make one or more onward steps. This consideration affords especially clear evidence for the _ assertion upon which I have already laid great emphasis— that the development of any mental faculty is not necessarily con- nected with any elevation of the mental capacity of the individual. Hardly any greater power of observation or more acuteness is required to observe the development of an Infusorian under the microscope, than was needed in Aristotle’s time to make out the anatomy of a Cuttlefish, with the naked eye and simple 1 Very similar ideas have been recently expressed by D. G. Ritchie in his ‘ Darwinism and Politics’ (London: 1891). Thus on pp. roo, ror he writes as follows. ‘ Language renders possible the transmission of experience irrespective of transmission by heredity. By means of language and of social institutions we inherit the acquired experience, not of our ancestors only, but of other races in the same sense of “‘in- heritance”’ in which we talk of people inheriting land or furniture or railway shares. Language renders possible an accumulation of experi- ence, a storing-up of achievements, which makes advance rapid and secure among human beings in a way impossible among the lower animals. Indeed, might we not define civilisation in general as the sum of those contrivances which enable human beings to advance indepen- dently of heredity ?’—E. B. P. E 2 52 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE [x dissecting instruments. The fact that we can now solve more difficult problems than at the beginning of this century, or in Aristotle’s day, does not depend upon any increase in the capacity of the human brain or any improvement in the delicacy of the faculty of observation; but it depends upon the heritage which we have received from our ancestors, viz. higher problems left for our solution together with better means and appliances for their investigation. /¢7s as tmpossible to explain the development of music by an increase and perfecting of the musical talent, as to explain the superiority of our pianists over those of Mozart's time by a recent improvement in the dexterity of the human hand. The very hands which, in Bach’s day, could only give a bald and imperfect performance on the spinet, would now, upon a Steinway’s or Bechstein’s grand piano, produce all the enchanting effect of an orchestra. The causes of this immense change are manifold. First, a gradual im- provement in the instrument,—itself a result of tradition which permitted an advance upon the acquirements of earlier generations; secondly, parallel with this advance, the develop- ment of appropriate music; lastly, the immense improvement in pianoforte technique which we associate with the names of Haydn, Mozart, Clementi, Hummel, Moscheles, Thalberg, and Liszt. No one would dream of suggesting that this advance in ‘technique’ is due to an improvement, as regards piano- playing, in the powers of the human hand, produced by the practice of several consecutive generations. Such an origin is indeed impossible, because, happily, every one does not play the piano, because every pianist is not a performer of eminence, and because the children of such performers rarely become performers themselves. Liszt’s father was a clerk in an accountant’s office. Among all our living performers I only know one, Pauer of London, whose son is a pianist. It is clear that in this case also the possibility of higher performance does not depend on higher talent, but upon the tradition of improved technique which enables the young artist to strive, from the very first, after a higher ideal. It is the same, I believe, with music itself—nay with all the arts. That emotional instrument wherewith we make music, whether developed within us or received from without, has been innate in man, and has undergone hardly any x] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 53 Vv improvement from times immemorial. But in these days we know how to employ it more fully because we have trained it to higher achievement from the very beginning of life. The musical talent, like every other, is capable of vast improvement by life-long training. I well remember hearing for the first time, as a boy of thirteen, a great performance—the Pastoral Symphony of Beethoven. How clear and distinct is the meaning of such a composition now that we are accustomed to hear far more intricately written orchestral works! I was even then impressed by the mighty ocean of music, and listened with the greatest interest ; but I was unable to disentangle the theme from the maze of notes and to understand its ideas. It was only by practice of my mental sense, through frequently listening to this symphony, that my power of musical percep- tion acquired the capacity of picking out, and distinguishing, particular passages more and more clearly from the totality of the composition, and placing those passages into their due relation to the swell of the waves of music which surged along beside them. Although the average musical faculty has not undergone any increase, in the course of ages, it must at one time have originated; and the question arises whether we can explain this from a scientific standpoint. How can we conceive the existence of a musical sense ? Attempts in this direction have been repeatedly made, not only since the doctrine of evolution has become prevalent, but also during past centuries. The able psychologist C. Stumpf has recently directed attention to the fact that the question of the origin of music greatly occupied men’s minds, especially in France, during the middle of the last century. Jean Jacques Rousseau had already formed the opinion that music originated in language, in excited speech, a view that was simultaneously brought forward in Germany by Scheibe. This hypothesis must have been forgotten later on, or Herbert Spencer would never have enunciated and supported it without reference to his predecessors. It has met with little acceptance, and has been refuted in detail; it may now be looked upon as an abandoned position. This can hardly be said of the hypothesis brought forward by Darwin, who held the antagonistic view that song is older than language, and arose by sexual selection. 54 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE (ae Important objections have however been raised against this hypothesis by many writers, and especially by Stumpf. And yet I would freely admit that at present it is difficult, nay impossible, to decide whether sexual selection has or has not had any part in the origin of human song. But even if it has played this part, it by no means follows that there was a similar origin for the musical sense also: this faculty might have been present beforehand. It would lead me too far if I were to attempt any detailed exposition of the reasons which, as I think, oppose the hypothesis of the origin of the musical sense by sexual selec- tion. They partly depend upon the above-mentioned fact that any increase in this faculty has not taken place since the stage reached by man in a savage state. Other objections depend upon certain considerations of which I will now speak. The explanation of the musical sense is to be looked for in an entirely different direction; I do not believe that it originated as something independent and as it were intended for the duty it performs, but that it is simply a bye-product or accessory of the auditory organ. This organ was a necessity in the struggle for existence and has therefore been developed by selective processes, and raised to the highest pitch of perfection. The musical sense is, I believe, a merely incidental production and thus in a certain sense, an unintended one. No one can believe that the human hand was created for playing on the piano,—that it became what it now is in order that man might be able to make use of this instrument. It is, as we know, fitted for grasping and for the power of delicate touch ; and as these are very useful qualities, of high importance in the struggle for life, we feel no difficulty in explaining the gradual perfecting, by processes of selection, of that form of hand which the higher animals had already gained. By means of selection, the hand became the perfectly articulated, sensitive, and mobile structure that we find, not only in ourselves, but in the very lowest savages. But we can do many things with our fingers which were never intended, if I may use the expression ; we can, for instance, play on the piano, now that this instrument has been invented. And furthermore a native African could, if trained as a child and under certain conditions, learn all the technique of the modern piano as thoroughly as a European. X.] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 55 I believe it to be much the same with the musical sense and the artistic faculty in general. This faculty is, as it were, the mental hand with which we play on our emotional nature,— a hand not shaped for this purpose, not due to the necessity for the enjoy- ment of music, but owing its origin to entirely different require- ments. I will give more detailed evidence in support of this view. Our musical organization consists of two parts :—first, the auditory organ proper, viz. the outer, middle, and inner ear, by which the various sounds become nervous stimuli, each producing its corresponding nerve-impulse: secondly, that part of the brain which transforms the impulses conveyed to it by the auditory nerve into sensations of sound; this is the auditory centre of our brain. The first part of this twofold organ, the auditory organ proper, is, so far as we know, not much higher in organization than that of many animals, and it does not possess any peculiarity of construction which would justify us in the assumption that the power of /earing music is greater than in animals. The higher animals can certainly hear music: the behaviour of my cat is sufficient evidence for this, for she comes near whenever the piano is played and sits quietly near the performer, sometimes jumping up into his lap or even upon the keyboard of the instrument. I know of a dog, kept by a family in Berlin, which always approached when music was played, often coming from distant rooms and opening the doors with his paw. I hear, on good authority, of a dog which generally stayed at home, but wandered about every now and then in order to indulge his love of music. This dog could never be kept at home during the fair which is held twice a year at Frankfort-on-the-Main. As soon as the street bands appeared and began to play the dog ran off and followed them through the streets of Frankfort from morning till night. This habit was well known by his owners who were accustomed to keep dinner for him in the evening at the time of the fair. It is sufficiently clear that neither cats nor dogs nor any of the other animals which hear the music of man were formed with a view to the perception of such sounds. I mean that the auditory organ which they possess, arising under the guidance of natural selection, cannot have assumed its present form in 56 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE [X. order that these animals might perceive music; for such an experience confers absolutely no advantage in the struggle for existence. Besides, the animals and their auditory organs are far older than man and his music. The faculty of hearing music possessed by these animals must be an incidental ac- cessory power possessed by an auditory apparatus which assumed its present form under the operation of other causes. Now I believe that it is the same with man. Man, too, did not acquire his power of hearing music as something by itself, but he received, by processes of selection, a very delicate and highly elaborate auditory organ; for this organ has been necessary in the struggle. And furthermore, it so happens that this organ can also be used for hearing music. By the assertion that the auditory organ of man was produced by natural selection, I do not mean to imply that it was not already formed in the pre-human period. We have never found the direct ancestors of man, and even if we were fortunate enough to meet with their remains it would be impossible to make out the minute microscopic structure of the soft tissues which, during life, covered the osseous parts of the auditory ap- paratus deeply buried in one of the bones of the skull. But it is most probable that our direct ancestors possessed an auditory organ nearly similar to that which we possess to-day; for in the living caricatures of men, the apes, it reaches almost the same degree of perfection. It must be admitted that there are no researches into the minute details of the ape’s ear like those of Hasse and Retzius on the auditory organ of certain other Mammalia. Hence we cannot decide whether the length of the scale which can be heard by an ape is as great as that heard by aman; but we may assume that it is nearly the same. The power of appreciating the interval between musical notes depends, as we know, upon a wonderfully complex apparatus placed in the so-called cochlea. This structure called after its discoverer, Corti’s Organ, consists of thousands of cells which form the terminations of auditory nerve-fibres: each cell can only be made to vibrate by a single note of a certain pitch. This is brought about by the fact that each cell rests upon part of an elastic membrane of microscopic delicacy which passes across the cavity of the cochlea, just as upon a stretched string which only vibrates with a particular note. If Helmholtz’s in- X.] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 57 terpretation of the apparatus be correct, we can judge of the delicacy of any auditory apparatus by the number of such cells. The greater the number of cells the more delicate will be the hearing of the animal and the wider will be its range. The exact measurement and enumeration of Retzius have shown us that the human cochlea contains 15,500 such cells, that of the cat 12,500, that of the rabbit 7,800. Hence man has a more perfect sense of hearing than either of these two animals, but we can- not determine with certainty whether he can better appreciate minute differences, or whether he can hear more notes: pro- bably he is superior in both these respects. There are also individual differences in the number of cells in the human species, although perhaps only within narrow limits. Such differences explain why some individuals do not hear so well, or cannot distinguish so many deep or high notes, as others. I myself possess a rather fine ear, but I can never hear the high notes of certain species of grasshoppers, even when hundreds of them chirp together, although others can hear them easily. If then the apparatus by which music is heard in the cat and the rabbit be essentially the same as that of man, only differing in degree, the following question is naturally suggested :— Knowing that nothing can arise unless it be useful, how has tt been possible for this apparatus to originate? The power of hearing music must have been utterly useless to those animals which do not make music, and hence the origin of their auditory apparatus must have proceeded from other necessities. What can these necessities be? Why has it been useful to Mammalia in the struggle for existence to hear with distinctness all the large number of notes for which their auditory apparatus is fitted, and which renders the hearing of music a possibility? This question has probably never been asked before, and I must admit that the answer is by no means easy; at any rate if a complete and detailed explanation be expected. But I believe that it is easy to understand in a general way how the ear of these animals could have been elaborated and raised to so high a pitch by natural selection. Wild animals stand in need of a very fine ear. Beasts of prey, such as cats, must in the first place be able to hear and distinguish between all the sounds made by 58 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE [X. their prey. But this means that they must hear a scale of considerable length; that, for instance, of the cat must pass through all the interval between the cooing of the wood-pigeon the call of the cuckoo, and the notes produced by the blackbird, the chaffinch, the linnet, the siskin, the thrush, and the pheasant. But the wild animal must also be able to hear the sounds made by its enemies and distinguish them from others. And not only is this the case with the animal sought after by many enemies, such as the rabbit, but the enemy itself must also be upon its guard against other enemies which endanger its life and that of its young. It must distinguish the howl of the hungry wolf from the bark of the fox or dog, the deep note of the eagle owl from the cry of the eagle and vulture. We need not here take man into account, because his existence only began long after the development of the auditory organ in these animals, and because his influence upon them has been annihilating rather than transforming. It was therefore necessary for the auditory organs of these animals to have a very extensive range, stretching from rather low notes on the one side to very high ones on the other. It was essential that the organ should be adapted for a continuous scale without breaks; for otherwise the position of the various notes could not have been accurately estimated. Indeed we feel a sense of admiration and wonder when we see the exceed- ingly high development of the cochlea adapted for hearing a continuous scale in the mammalian ear, and we can only under- stand it when we realize how completely the very existence of wild animals depends on the utmost delicacy of their organs of special sense. It is absolutely essential for them to know with certainty whether any particular sound proceeds from an enemy or from their prey. While a single mistake might be fatal to them, one often repeated would be inevitably punished with death. If they mistook the sound made by an enemy for that of their prey they would of course go to certain destruction, but the opposite mistake would also be fatal; for the food of a beast of prey is nearly always scarce, and if many opportunities were missed the animal would die of starvation. It is not in vain that the fox roves about by night and day searching for food, listening for the faintest sound, and ever ready to rush upon its prey or to fly; it is not in vain that the hare is so X.] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 59 timid ; it needs to be extremely sensitive to every sound if it is to continue to exist as a species. Hence we can perhaps to some extent understand why the rabbit has 7800 cells in its auditory organ, although this implies the most astonishing delicacy of ear. We must not however assume that each of these cells is set to a different note, but rather that the four cells of each transverse row are fitted to receive the same vibra- tion. There remains, however, a surprisingly large number of different note-sensations, i.e. nearly 2000. We can realize how very delicate hearing must be, which can appreciate only 1000 different notes, when we remember that a concert grand piano contains only 87 different notes. If we reckon that the auditory organ can appreciate a somewhat longer scale, namely that of a hundred notes situated at the distance of semitones, it follows that the interval between two consecutive semitones would contain nearly 19 intermediate sounds. The human ear, when very highly trained, can distinguish nearly 30 inter- mediate notes between A and B-flat, a rather larger number than the difference between the numbers of their respective vibrations in a second,—(A = 440, B-flat = 467.5). If then the mammalian auditory organ must attain so high a pitch of perfection lest it should be inadequate in the struggle for life, it is clear that the part of the brain by which notes are perceived, the auditory centre, must possess a corresponding degree of organization. We may indeed assume it to be certain that a corresponding degree of development is found in those layers of nerve-cells and nerve-fibres in the auditory centre, the so-called ‘field of memory,’ which serve as the material basis of the memory of auditory perceptions. Aristotle was quite correct in maintaining that ‘animals devoid of memory would be unable to perceive even the difference between two successive notes'.’ But an elaborate auditory organ would be of little or no value to such animals; they would be unable to discriminate between the sound of an enemy and that of their prey, for they could not compare the note they were hearing with that previously heard, the latter having wholly faded from their consciousness. It is much to be regretted that we can know with certainty in but few cases how far an animal is capable of perceiving 1 T quote from C. Stumpf, ‘Tonpsychologie,’ Bd. i, p. 279. 60 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE [X. music. The capacity seems to be present in a tolerably high degree ; for it is known that cavalry horses often recognize the signals as well as their riders and begin the appropriate movements before being directed. The evidence is especially clear in the case of certain birds, far below the above mentioned mammals in mental power, that music may be heard and properly understood by organisms which cannot have acquired their auditory apparatus for this purpose. I am here referring to those birds which either have no. song of their own or a very simple one, but which are nevertheless capable of imitating the more beautiful song of other birds or even the melodies of human music. This is especially remarkable in the case of parrots, which can learn to sing short melodies quite correctly. It is therefore certain that they possess the apparatus necessary for hearing music, although they do not sing unless taught. Hence the supposition appears to be well founded that man possessed the auditory apparatus necessary for music before he made music, and that the apparatus did not, by making music, attain the degree of development it has reached. It is not necessary to assume that the capacity of hearing music was a primitive faculty acquired for its own sake; it may rather be conceived of as a secondary, an ‘unintended,’ ac- cessory, aS a mere incident in the evolution of the auditory organ which reached its high development by ministering to other necessities. It might perhaps be objected that neither the minute struc- ture of the cochlea nor the power of hearing an extensive scale proves that music is perceived as music, or that we do as a matter of fact hear the third or fifth which is sounded. It might be conceived that the musical sense depends upon yet another and unknown peculiarity of the auditory apparatus, a peculiarity which has been added to the function of hearing and the origin of which therefore demands some special explanation. But this objection will not hold, because animals such as the horse and parrot, can as a matter of fact hear music, although we cannot assume thatthey possess any special contrivance for it. The basis on which this objection rests is nevertheless sound, for we can never explain the faculty of hearing music by the knowledge of our auditory apparatus alone. But to use this x] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 61 undoubted fact as an argument for the conclusion stated above, would be like maintaining that the hand was specially created in order to play the piano, because we can never explain, by a mere examination of its structure, the infinitely rapid move- ments made bya performer. It might be argued that inasmuch as the hand and fingers were never required to make such swift mov ments when man existed in a primitive state, they could not have been originally capable of such movements, and that therefore the faculty which they now possess must have depended upon sexual selection or the results of inherited practice. The same might be said with regard to the swift movements of the fingers in writing. Such arguments depend upon a mistaken application of the principles of utility, a principle which certainly excludes the possibility of raising an organ by the process of selection above the highest point of actual utility, but which by no means prevents it from acquiring new uses as the result of life-long practice. A more serious objection may be derived from the considera- tion of those who are utterly unmusical. We cannot doubt that many such people exist, even if most of them are to be accounted for by want of training at the right time. Those whoare totally devoid of the faculty of music, can apparently hear sounds and notes of every kind as fully as musical people, but they are unable to discern the intervals, or to perceive and reproduce a melody, much less to analyse a harmony. If then their auditory organ be normally developed we are apparently con- fronted with the proof that musical hearing is different from ordinary hearing, and has been superadded to the latter,—that therefore it cannot be merely an inevitable accessory, but has sprung from a source which demands some special explana- tion. : This argument appears to be sound, but I do not believe that it is so. The assumption that the hearing of unmusical people is as highly developed as that of the musical is utterly unproved, and I believe that it is most improbable. It is to be regretted that there are no sufficiently exact researches into the ordinary hearing of unmusical persons, and that we have even less knowledge of the minute structure of their auditory apparatus. But from what we know of musical hearing it follows that the 62 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE [X. ordinary hearing of such people must be imperfect and their auditory apparatus abnormal in structure. The meaning of the word ‘unmusical’ is merely relative. Mozart possessed such a wonderful memory for absolute pitch that he once remarked, directly he began to play his own violin, that it was tuned half of a quarter-tone higher than one he had played two days before. But many people, although admitted to be very musical, have the feeblest memory, or almost none at all, for absolute pitch. They cannot tell whether the per- formance they are listening to is in the key of A, C, or F: their memory deals with intervals alone, and they are satisfied if only the relations of the notes in any piece of music are correct. This is certainly often due to want of practice, and it is also connected with the important part played by the pianoforte in the musical education of mankind. The note A is much more firmly fixed in the mind of a violinist and has a far more indi- vidual character for him than any particular note of the pianoforte scale has forthe pianist. But it is equally certain that there are also differences of talent as regards thememory for absolute pitch. Leaving the greatest heights of musical genius, we find that the perception of intervals may also be deficient, and that such deficiency increases gradually in different individuals until we reach a case like that described by Grant Allen in which the notes sounded by two successive keys on the piano seem to be absolutely the same. Such defects in hearing can only be explained by some imperfection in the structure of the auditory organ, in this case in the organ of Corti. Hence such an auditory organ would not represent what we may suppose to have been the primitive ear of man before he began to be musical; it is merely an example of degeneration. A _ perfectly normal auditory organ must always be musical, and this not only with regard to the perception of intervals, but also to the recognition of absolute pitch. For even animals must possess the power of distinguishing a note as higher or lower than some other note of which the pitch is retained in their memory, and if they were incapable of this they would be exposed to countless dangerous mistakes. We certainly cannot regard the ear of Mozart as the primitive normal ear of mankind; we must rather regard it as an abnormality as much above the average as the ear of a moderately unmusical person is below it. But even Grant X.] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 63 “ Allen’s extreme case proves that the perception of absolute pitch is retained by civilized man; for this individual distin- guished high and low notes, although he could not perceive any difference between the successive notes of the scale when he played it. Hence the different degrees of imperfection in the musical faculty seem to me to be traceable to defects in the structure of the auditory organ, to a more or less complete degeneration from its original and normal state. Defect and degeneration are, as everyone knows, apt to occur in any part of the body, and should occasion the least surprise in an organ which, like the human ear, no longer plays a decisive part in the preservation of the species,—a part which it must certainly have played ages ago when man lived under more natural conditions. In such times he needed a perfect ear just as wild animals need it now. The civilized man of the present day no longer depends on the acuteness and perfection of this sense; it is, to a certain extent, of no importance whether he has or has not the full number of 15,500 cells in his cochlea. But those persons in whom the number or perhaps the minute structure of these cells is below the average, or in whom the tension of the membranes is abnormal, will probably be unable to perceive musical intervals correctly or may be unable to perceive them at all; such persons are unmusical. I do not mean this statement to imply that defects in Corti’s organ are the only cause of a deficient musical faculty. In some cases perhaps the cause may lie in the auditory centre, viz. the part of the brain where the impulses of nerves, produced by the stimuli of sound-waves, are transformed into the perceptions which we call notes. Certain kinds of deficiency in the faculty even suggest that the auditory organ and centre may be quite normal, but that there is merely a less perfect and less complex interconnection between this and the other brain-centres, so that the mental perception of music is not possible although the music itself is correctly heard. It is especially interesting to compare such cases with the remarkable and extremely variable phenomena witnessed in those who, from the lesion of a small part of the brain, have lost, either wholly or in part, the faculty of perceiving and producing music, such loss being frequently associated with defects of speech. In addition to 64 THOUGHTS UPON THE: MUSICAL SENSE [X. Kussmaul’s admirably explained observations, Kast, Knoblauch, and Oppenheim, among German pathologists, have offered interesting contributions to this difficult and complex subject, into which of course I cannot enter upon the present occasion. For the present purpose I merely wish to show that deficiency in the musical faculty must always depend upon defect in the anatomical structure of the auditory apparatus, the auditory centre, or their means of connection. If this beso, the existence of unmusical people constitutes no objection to the view I have propounded as to the origin of the musical sense. But must we really admit that the musical talent of primitive man was the same as our own? Can it be conceived that, in these remote times, there were born men who, educated in one of our schools of music, would have produced a Haydn, a Mozart, or Beethoven, or even an ordinary musician of to-day? I am quite sure that this admission will never be made. For it is clear that the understanding of our highest music not only needs the auditory apparatus and auditory centre, together with the life-long training of these : something besides is absolutely indispensable, a mind that is sensitive, impressionable, and highly developed. I will enter rather more fully into this point. The frequently mentioned auditory centre is not a mere supposition ; itis known with tolerable certainty. When a certain part of the temporal lobe of the cerebrum is destroyed in a dog or monkey, deafness ensues, although the auditory apparatus remains uninjured. Such animals do not suffer greatly in health ; they continue to live, but remain permanently deaf. And all the while the sound-waves are still converted into nerve-impulses by the auditory apparatus, and the impulses corresponding tothe several notes are still conveyed to the brain by the fibres of the auditory nerve. But in the brain that organ is wanting by which these impulses are transformed into sensations and are brought into relation with consciousness ; the animal is ‘psychically deaf,’ as the technical expression goes. If on the other hand we were able to remove every part of the cerebrum except the auditory centre, then the mechanical conditions necessary for the production of sound-sensations would still remain, but the animal or the man would neverthe- x] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 65 less be unable to hear, because nothing capable of becoming conscious of sound-sensations would be left in the brain. In removing nearly the whole cerebrum the mind would be lost together with all its accessory powers, thought, imagination, will, and self-consciousness. The ‘soul’ would be wanting, and hence even the most beautiful of the sound-sensations produced in the auditory centre could not be perceived because there would be nothing capable of perception. I have only mentioned this hypothetical case in order to show that the way in which music is perceived depends not only upon the auditory centre, but quite as fully upon the organ which lies behind, receives the sound-pictures, and allows them to have their full effect upon it. If, as in the case supposed above, there be no mind, then not a single sound- image can be perceived; but with a highly developed human mind of infinite freedom and flexibility and rich in ideas, the ‘parts’ of a polyphonic composition which run through each other, and proceed by contrary movement, can be perceived as the most charming musical architecture ; they make up an artistic structure of rich form, the several parts of which exhibit the most significant relationship, rising from and returning into each other, and ever presenting in each of its separate parts fresh features and new and interesting combinations. But the case is very different with the comparatively lowly organized brain of an animal such asa parrot; for the power of mind is insufficient to take in such an elaborate sound-picture, and the animal can only perceive a confusion of notes, although perhaps a pleasing one. Even after constant practice the parrot would be unable to follow the movements of the ‘ parts’ ef the composition, because it lacks the necessary intelligence. We know by its whistling that it can hear music, but even in this it makes but little progress, and can only repeat short pieces, because it does not understand the connection between the parts. There is of course a very marked difference between the musical perception of a parrot’s brain and that of a man. But a comparison between the two is perhaps on this very account best qualified to render evident the conclusion with which we are here concerned, viz. that one and the same auditory organ together with its auditory centre must produce an entirely different effect upon the mind according as this is more VOL. II. F 66 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE [X. highly or lowly organized. The ‘soul’ is, as it were, played upon like an instrument by the musical nerve-vibrations of the auditory centre. . The more perfect this instrument is the greater is the effect produced. The perception of music by the highest animals, such as the dog, cat, or horse, must be very imperfect as regards the purely formal relation between chords and successions of simple notes, because their mind is lowly developed, because their intellect cannot find any interest in following the manifold intricacies of the progress of ‘parts.’ It is not keen and acute enough even to perceive the varying distinctions between one ‘timbre’ of sound and another, for it has no purely mental interests. Only in the most crude and general manner are the souls of animals open to the emotional effects of music. Music impresses them as agreeable or disagreeable, and attracts them entirely irrespec- tive of what we call the ‘character’ of a performance. The above-mentioned dog which followed the music of the fair was probably agreeably affected by every performance of the street band, whether it was in a major or minor key, whether it was a polka or a funeral march. So far as the dog was concerned the finer shades of difference, by which we are affected so powerfully, had no existence at all; it was only impressed by the sound, the mere pure matter of music, a thing which is of no importance to us as compared with the form of it. That which we admire most in music, and which chiefly excites our interest, is the originality and richness of musical forms, as Hanslick has so admirably shown in his interesting essay on ‘The Beautiful in Music!” We are able to enjoy a symphony in a pianoforte arrangement, or, with sufficient practice, by merely reading the notes; and we appreciate not merely its formal relationship, but also its emotional effect and significance. By reading it we can be sent into a happy or a melancholy frame of mind, and we can fancy that we see in the composition the representation of moods of mind as distinguished from par- ticular ‘feelings.’ Everyone will admit that, at any rate as re- gards this latter effect of music, even the highest animal can never have any idea, even though its hearing and its auditory centre were practised for the whole of its life; and this must be * See also ‘ Sensation and Intuition’ by James Sully, and ‘ The Power of Sound’ by Edmund Gurney. X.] IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 67 so because behind its auditory and musical sense there lies no correspondingly developed mind. The same thing holds, although not to an equal extent, between the varied degrees of development reached by the human mind. If primitive man did not possess a mind like that of his descendants, if his intellect and every dependent power became far keener and deeper as the struggle for life went on through the course of ages, it follows that the faculty of perceiving music must also have been augmented. It is therefore impossible that a lost Beethoven ever existed among primitive man, nay, I should even doubt whether one could be found among existing Australians or negroes. For the production of a Beethoven there is needed not only a highly developed musical sense, but also a rich and great soul, one that is infinitely sensitive ; and we know by experience that such a nature is only to be found among the very highest intellects. But I will go further; I do not believe that the child of primitive man, if he were alive to-day, could be raised by education to the same level of musical understanding as that reached by our own children. He would fail for want of inherent power of mind. Of course these opinions can never be confirmed, because primitive man is not to be found. But we still have the Australian native, although, so far as I am aware, the neces- sary investigations have never yet been made. But even if they were never carried out, it would nevertheless be certain that primitive man must have possessed lower mental faculties and especially a humbler intellect than civilized man: this conclusion is commonly accepted, and it is sufficient for my argument. Hence we may assume that susceptibility to music must have increased during the intellectual evolution of mankind, so long, in fact, as the essential nature of the human mind was capable of being raised. It is impossible to decide upon the precise period in the history of a certain nation or group of nations at which the climax was reached; for we are by no means sure that the human intellect is not even now under- going slow and imperceptible development. But as a mere suggestion, without any pretence to exactness, I will state that the people of ‘antiquity,’ viz. the ancient civilized nations of F 2 68 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE EA the Mediterranean, had already, at the very dawn of their history, attained the highest level of intellectual development. If any further growth has occurred since then in European nations, it has certainly been so imperceptibly small that it could cause no sensible difference in the susceptibility of the human soul to music. The times which produced such legis- lators as Moses and Solon, poets like Homer and Sophocles, philosophers and men of science like Aristotle, Plato, and Archimedes,—times which created the Egyptian temples and pyramids and the statues of Greek gods, most undoubtedly display the achievements of the human intellect at its best. And an age which produced the gentle and forgiving Christian philosophy shows us that, as regards character and feeling, the human mind had attained the highest development. We may therefore safely assume that the nations of ‘anti- quity’ possessed a capacity for music in all respects equal to our own, and that the times during which the human intellect was raised, at least to any considerable extent, lie far behind them. The fact however that the music of antiquity was so poor, depends, as we have seen, upon the complete distinction between music and musical talent: the latter is due, and due only, to the nature of the individual body and mind, while the former is also due to a slow process of development by means of tradition. Music is an invention and rests upon tradition,— the power on which depend the entire growth of culture, the development of language, of the sciences and their practical applications, and of every kind of art. Painting and sculpture also have not been developed, viz. increased and perfected, because of any growth in the physical means by which we practise them. The human eye and the corresponding part of the brain, the visual centre, have certainly not been improved since the age of the lowest culture, or even since the times of primitive man. But the artistic acquirements of generations have been built one upon another until there arose the great art-palace of the present day with all its varied chambers. In this case it is even easier to prove that the instrument by which art has been invented existed in all its present perfection long before the invention had been made, and that it did not originate for the sake of art, but to be used as a IN ANIMALS AND MAN. 69 a weapon in the great struggle for life. It is evident that the keenest vision is of vast importance for the preservation of the human species. Hence the arts of painting and sculpture are, in the sense above mentioned, merely the incidental accessory performance of a faculty never intended for such a purpose. It is quite true that the beginnings of art can be traced far back to the times of the cave-dwellers; but whenever it began an immense period was required for its development,—a period which must have been especially long in the case of music. It is almost impossible to realize that men with such high gesthetic instincts as those possessed by the ancient Greeks could have enjoyed the unisonal effect of accompaniment in the octave ; and we can hardly believe that they were unable to invent music in two parts. And yet a long time elapsed before the gallant troubadours of Provence hit upon the idea of letting the melody be accompanied by another deeper-pitched voice, originally moreover in succession of fourths and fifths, so very unpleasant to us at the present day, but which may even now be occasionally heard in the street music of Brittany. It is not my intention to follow the slow and gradual evolution of music; for this has been clearly shown by the excellent work of other writers. But in concluding I wish to repeat that this evolution does not depend upon any increase of the musical faculty or any alteration in the inherent physical nature of man, but solely upon the power of transmitting the intellectual achievements of each generation to those which follow. This, more than anything, is the cause of the superiority of man over animals—this, and not merely human faculty, although it may be admitted that the latter is much higher than in animals. And even if we were compelled to believe that human faculty has reached its limits and can never be increased again, even then we need not despair of the almost boundless progress of mankind. For each generation always starts from the acquirements of the preceding one; and the living child placed from the very first by tradition upon a somewhat greater height of intellectual achievement than that of his predecessors, is then able, with the same powers, to climb yet higher up the steep slope of the most advanced civilization. Hence, even if our intellectual powers have reached the highest possible stage, human civilization will nevertheless advance, however far we - 70 THOUGHTS UPON THE MUSICAL SENSE, ETC. {X: may look forward,—the conquests of the mind of man will never cease. Lastly I trust that the scientific man may be excused if, in this essay, he has entered into what may appear to be a very distant region. Nevertheless it was a purely scientific question which led him into this inquiry—the question of the hereditary transmission of acquired characters. He attempted to explain, without any transmission ofthe results of practice, the existence of those human faculties which cannot be explained by. the process of selection. This led to the explanation of the origin of the musical sense which has been adopted in this essay. Perhaps the opinions of a biologist may not be altogether devoid of interest for the philosopher and the musical critic. The questions treated of lie on the boundary between science and philosophy, and can hardly be solved from either province alone. XI. Remarks on Certain Problems of the Day. 1890. From the ‘ Biologisches Centralblatt,) Bd. X., Nr. 1 and a, pages r and 33: March, 1890. XI. REMARKS ON CERTAIN. PROBEEMS OPP Es AY Tue following essay was originally intended as an answer to the criticisms which Professor Vines‘ brought forward against certain of my views, shortly after the publication, in an English form, of a collected edition of those essays of mine which appeared in Germany during the years 1881-1889 ”. This answer has been published in German because similar objections have been urged by German writers, and I further hope that this essay may perhaps serve to render clearer some of the problems with which it deals. Much might have been added on the points here referred to, but the occasion, and the nature of the essay itself, called for a certain amount of restric- tion, and enforced a concentrated treatment of the most impor- tant subjects. Professor Vines commenced his article by a criticism of that attribute of immortality which I have claimed both for unicel- lular organisms and for the reproductive cells of multicellular beings. If I rightly understand the English professor, he does not contest the truth of this view, but he fails to find in my book a satisfactory explanation of the process by which the immortal organisms gave rise, in the course of their phyletic development, to mortal descendants. The first difficulty which presents itself is to understand how the mortal heteroplas- tides can have been evolved from the immortal monoplastides or homoplastides. The explanation of this process, given in my book, is the only one which seems applicable to the 1 “Nature, Oct. 24, 1889, p. 621 et seqq. 2 See Vol. I of the present Edition. 74 REMARKS ON CERTAIN [XT. origin of the more complex forms of organic life, namely, that, in accordance with the principle of division of labour, the cell- body of the unicellular ancestor divided into two dissimilar halves, which differed from each other both in structure and function. From a single cell which was capable of performing all functions, a group of cells arose and shared the various kinds of work between them. According to my theory, the primitive division produced two kinds of cells, the mortal cells of the body proper (soma) and the immortal germ-cells. Un- doubtedly Professor Vines believes, as I do, in the principle of © division of labour, and in the réle which this principle plays in the development of the organic world; but the division of a unicellular being into somatic and reproductive cells appears to him impossible, and my explanation of the process as due to unequal cell-division does not satisfy him; he holds that ‘it is absurd to say that an immortal substance can be converted into a mortal substance?) At first sight indeed this may appear as a great difficulty ; it is in reality, however, caused by a confusion between two dis- tinct ideas, namely, immortality and eternity. The immortality of unicellular beings and of the reproductive cells of multicel- lular organisms is, I believe, a fact which does not admit of dis- pute. As soon as it is once made clear that the fission of a monoplastid is in no way bound up with the death of either half, there can be no further dispute about the unlimited per- sistence of the individual. But this is very far from affirming that such individuals are endowed with eternal life; on the contrary, we always assume that the organic life on our earth once had a beginning. The conception of eternity involves the past as well as the future, for eternity is without beginning and without end ; but it is obvious that such a conception does not concern us here. Eternity is at best but an artificial idea; in reality it is no true idea at all, since we cannot conceive it; it is only the negation of an idea, being in fact the negation of that which passes away. When we begin to discuss eternity, we see that from the point of view of Natural Science, nothing is eternal except the ultimate particles of matter and their forces ; for no one of the thousandfold phenomena and combinations under which matter and force present themselves to us can 1 « Nature,’ Oct. 1889, p. 623. XI.] PROBLEMS OF THE DAY. 75 be eternal. The immortality of unicellular organisms and of germ-cells is, as I said years ago, not absolute, but po- tential; for they are not, like the gods of ancient Greece, compelled to live for ever. Thus we are told that Ares received- a wound which would have proved fatal to any mortal, but although he roared as loud as ten thousand bulls, he could not die. The organisms in question can, and the ma- jority of them do die, but a part of each lives on. But is it one and the same substance which continues to live? Does not life, here and everywhere else, depend on assimilation, that is on a constant change of material ? What then is immortal? Appa- rently not a substance at all, but a certain form of motion. The protoplasm of unicellular beings possesses such an arrange- ment in its chemical and molecular structure, that the cycle of material which makes up life is ever repeating itself, and can always begin afresh so long as the external conditions remain favourable. In this respect it may be compared to the circu- lation of water on the earth. Water evaporates, is condensed into cloud, falls to the earth as rain, only once more to evapo- rate, and thus the cycle repeats itself. And just as there exists no inherent cause in the physical and chemical nature of water, which interrupts this circulation, so in the physical nature of the protoplasm of unicellular beings there is nothing which puts an end to the cycle of existence,—that is fission, growth by assimilation, and then fission again. It is this property which I have called immortality, and in organic nature it is the only real immortality to be met with. It is a purely biological conception, and must be distinguished from the immortality of non-living, that is of inorganic, matter. If then this real immortality is simply a cyclical movement conditional on certain physical properties of protoplasm, why should it be inconceivable that this property, under certain cir- cumstances, should alter to some extent, so that the phases of metabolic activity should not exactly repeat themselves, but after a certain number of cycles should come to an end, result- ing in death? All living matter varies, and why is it incon- ceivable that variations of protoplasm should arise which, while fulfilling better certain functions advantageous to the indivi- dual, should be associated with a metabolism that does not exactly repeat itself a metabolism that sooner or later comes 76 REMARKS ON CERTAIN (XI. to a stand-still? —Tomy mind the descent of the immortal to the condition of mortality, is less to be marvelled at than the fact that monoplastids and germ-cells have remained immortal. The slightest change in the properties of living matter might involve such a descent, and certain essential peculiarities in the composition of this substance must be most rigidly main- tained, in order that the metabolic cycle may sweep on with perfect smoothness, and raise no obstacle against its own per- sistence. Even if we know nothing further of these essential peculiarities of structure, we may at least maintain that the rigorous and unceasing operation of natural selection is neces- sary to maintain them. Any deviation from this standard ends in death. I believe that I have shown that organs which have ceased to be useful become rudimentary, and ultimately dis- appear owing to the principle of panmixia alone,—not be- cause of the direct effect of disuse, but because natural selec- tion no longer maintains them at their former. level. What is true of organs is also true of their functions; for function is but the expression of certain peculiarities of structure, whether we can directly perceive the connection or not. If then the immortality of unicellular beings rests on the fact that the struc- tural arrangement of their substance is so accurately adjusted that the metabolic cycle always comes back to the same point,— why should, or rather, how could this property of the proto- plasm, which is the cause of immortality, be retained when it ceased to be necessary? And clearly it is no longer of use in the somatic cells of heteroplastids. From the moment that natural selection relaxed its hold upon this property of the protoplasm, the power of panmixia began to be felt, and ulti- mately led to its disappearance. Prof. Vines will probably ask how this process can be conceived. I answer, quite simply. Let us suppose that certain individuals appeared among the monoplastids with such variation of the chemical or molecular characters. that the continuous recurrence of their metabolic cycle came to an end, so that natural death became a necessity. These individuals could never give rise to a persistent variety. But if individuals with a similar variation in their somatic cells arose among the heteroplastids, no detriment would be felt by the species: the body-cells would indeed die, but the undying germ-cells would secure the continuance of the species. By XI.] PROBLEMS OF THE DAY. re means of the distinction between somatic and germ-cells, natural selection was enabled to direct its attention, to speak metaphorically, to the immortality of the germ-cells, and to an entirely different range of properties among the somatic cells, such as the capacity for movement, irritability, increased powers of assimilation, &c. &c. We do not yet know whether an increase in these properties is directly connected with a change of constitution involving the loss of immortality, but it is not impossible that this may be the case; and, if so, the somatic cells would have ceased to be immortal more quickly than if panmixia were the only agency at work. I have adduced in my fourth essay’ the cases of the Volvo- cinean genera, Volvox and Pandorina, as examples of the differentiation of the lowest heteroplastids from the homo- plastids. All the cells of Pandorina are similar and perform similar functions. Volvox, on the other hand, consists of somatic and germ-cells, and it is here that we should expect the introduction of natural death. Dr. Klein’s recent observa- tions? show that this, as a matter of fact, takes place: as soon as the germ-cells are matured, and have left the body of the Alga, the flagellate somatic cells begin to shrink, and in one or two days are all dead. This is all the more interesting because the somatic cells fulfil nutritive functions for the aggregate. It is true that they are not alone in performing the office of assimilation, for the germ-cells also contain chlorophyll; but the immense size which the latter attain in Volvox can only be explained on the supposition that they receive nutriment from the somatic cells. These cells are so constituted that they assimilate, but when once the spherical colony has attained its definite size they have ceased to grow. By means of a fine protoplasmic network the body-cells pass on to the germ-cells all the nutriment they acquire from the decomposition of carbon dioxide and water, and when the reproductive cells are mature they die. In this case adaptation for supplying nutri- ment to the germ-cells may have hastened the introduction of death among the somatic cells, inasmuch as some structure may 1 See Vol. I, p. 163. 2 Ludwig Klein, ‘Morphologische und Biologische Studien tiber die Gattung Volvox.’ Pringsheim’s Jahrbiicher fiir wissenschaftliche Botanik, Bd. XX. 1889. 78 REMARKS ON CERTAIN (XI. have arisen in the latter which rendered possible more energetic assimilation, but which .was accompanied by an expenditure of nutriment, and which, after the lapse of a certain time, involved the complete cessation of assimilation, and con- sequently the death of the organism. The conception of a change in the protoplasm which involves the loss of immortality is to my mind no more improbable or more difficult than the commonly received view of the differen- tiation of somatic cells which gradually takes place in their phylogeny, by which they are enabled to assume various natures, 1.e. absorptive, secretory, muscular, nervous, &c. An unchangeable immortal protoplasm does not exist, only an immortal ‘form of activity’ in organic matter. Thus my former statement, that unicellular organisms and the reproductive cells of higher forms do not suffer natural death, is maintained in its entirety; and I know of no better way to give expression to this idea than to say that such structures possess immortality, that is real, true immortality, not the phantastic, visionary immortality of the old Greek gods. If then death from internal causes has no existence for the organisms and structures in question, we can nevertheless maintain with absolute certainty that every one of them will come to an end, not indeed by the operation of forces from within, but because the external conditions which are necessary for the constant renewal of vital activity must at some future time themselves cease to be. The physicist predicts that the circulation of water on the earth will at some time inevitably cease, not because of any change in the nature of water, but because external conditions will render impossible this kind of movement of its particles. Professor Vines then attacks my views on embryogeny. He finds it ‘not a little remarkable that Professor Weismann should not have offered any suggestion as to the conception which he has formed of the mode in which the conversion of germ-plasm into somatoplasm can take place, considering that this assump- tion is the key to his whole position’.’ He finds in this the same difficulty as in the phyletic development of multicellular from unicellular organisms. He concludes his objection with the words, ‘ There is really no other criticism to be made on an 1 « Nature,’ Oct. 1889, p. 623. XI.] PROBLEMS OF THE DAY. 79 unsupported assumption such as this, than to say that it in- volves a contradiction in terms’ By this Professor Vines means that the eternal cannot, from its very nature, pass into the mortal, as it must do, if the perishable soma is derived from undying germ-cells. It is obvious that this objection rests upon the same confusion between immortality and eternity which has been already rendered clear. I do not wish to reproach Professor Vines with regard to this confusion; some years ago I encountered the same objection, and did not at once see where the answer lay. We have hitherto beén without a scientific conception of immortality: we must understand by this term—not life without beginning or end—but life which, when it has once originated, continues without limit, accom- panied or unaccompanied by modification (viz. specific changes in unicellular organisms, or in the germ-plasm of multicellular forms). This immortality is a movement of organic material, which always recurs in a cycle, and is associated with no force that tends to arrest its progress, just as the motion of planets is associated with nothing which tends to arrest their move- ment, although it had a beginning and must at some future time, by the operation of external causes, come to an end. Further on, Professor Vines says, ‘I understand Professor Weismann to imply that his theory of heredity is not—like, for instance, Darwin’s theory of pangenesis—“‘a provisional or purely formal solution?” of the question, but one which is applicable to every detail of embryogeny, as well as to the more general phenomena of heredity and variation*.’ I have indeed, in contradistinction to my own attempt to give a theoretical basis to heredity, spoken of Darwin’s pangenesis as a purely formal solution of the question; and perhaps I may be allowed to give a short explanation of the expression, for I fear that, not only Professor Vines, but many other readers of my essays may have misunderstood me. On the one hand I am afraid that they may have found in my words a tacit objection to Darwin’s pangenesis, an objection which I did not at all intend, and, on the other, that I was inclined to overstate the value of my own theory. There are, I think, two kinds of theory which may be con- 1 XII.] CONFZUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 107 convolutions of the brain, and giving rise to the foetus under the influence of the semen ; just as the brain, under the influence of external impressions, gives rise to thoughts. The term ‘con- ception,’ when figuratively applied to mental processes,—a term which has been obviously derived from conception on the part of a woman,—is here reversed, and used to explain the very process from which it is itself derived. The same fundamental idea runs through all theories of fertilization up to the present time—the idea that the fertili- zation, i.e. the ‘vitalization of the egg’ is the important part, or, aS we may say, the true purpose of sexual reproduction. The other side of this mode of reproduction has been com- paratively neglected ; the fact that two different predispositions, on the one hand that of the father, and on the other that of the mother, are by fertilization united in a single organism, has appeared as a secondary, but it is clear to some extent as an inevitable result of fertilization. Although this view is nowhere directly expressed, it is implied in all the utterances of both older and more recent writers. It must be admitted that so long as biologists were acquainted with no method of reproduction except the sexual, it was impossible to regard fertilization in any other light; it seemed that the co-operation of two individuals was indispensable in order to call a third to life, and it can scarcely have been surprising for this new organism to resemble its progenitors more closely than any other living being. But, even in recent times, when other methods of reproduction among plants and animals gained recognition, they did not at first cause any alteration in that view which regards fertilization as a process of vitalization, a calling forth of new life. In the case of all those higher beings which do not possess the power of asexual reproduction, it became evident that a certain complexity of organization ex- cluded this method of increase. But then the asexual repro- duction of the lower organisms is by no means always sufficient to fulfil every condition necessary for the maintenance of the species, and hence the origin of new individuals from unicellular germs capable of fertilization must have appeared as an essen- tial advantage. The first fact which tended to throw doubt on the view that fertilization is a renewal of life was the discovery of parthe- 108 AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [XI nogenesis by C. Th. von Siebold’ and Rudolph Leuckart* When it was understood that, under certain circumstances, an egg could develope into a new individual without fertilization, this fact by itself was sufficient to show that a ‘ vitalization of the germ’ could not be the object of fertilization, and could not be the cause of its appearance among living beings. But it was long before the facts of parthenogenesis were ge- nerally accepted : indeed, in some circles they are not received at the present day. Only ten years ago, a prominent physio- logist, Pfliiger, held them to be unproved, and most botanists were inclined to doubt their existence among plants as well as animals; for at that time parthenogenesis appeared to be wanting in plants and to have been erroneously believed in at an earlier date. Even when de Bary and Farlow had proved its undoubted existence in certain ferns, and others had found it in certain fungi, the Basidiomycetes, and the existence of parthe- nogenesis among some plants and many animals could no longer be denied, the attempt was made to crush the pheno- mena in the Procrustean bed of the received conception of fertilization. The ingenious French savant Balbiani had pre- viously propounded the view that a certain occult and hitherto undiscovered fertilization took place at the seat of origin of the germs, in the ovaries and testes ; this fertilization was supposed to be in addition to the regular, recognized process, and, in cases of parthenogenesis, to compensate for it. So deeply rooted was the idea that new life could only arise by means of fertilization. Even those investigators who no longer doubted the reality of parthenogenesis could not immediately and completely rid themselves of the received view, but endeavoured to make the new facts harmonize with the old ideas. Probably the most interesting attempt of this kind proceeded from Hensen, who indeed recognized that the ‘views on sexual reproduction held up to that time had been overthrown’ by means of partheno- genesis, inasmuch as the fundamental proposition as to sexual propagation had failed, viz., that one of the two sexual cells is by itself incapable of development. He nevertheless believed 1 C. Th. von Siebold, ‘ Wahre Parthenogenesis’; Leipzig, 1856. 2 Rudolph Leuckart, ‘Zur Kenntniss des Generationswechsels und der Parthenogenesis bei den Insekten’; Frankfurt, 1858. XII.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 109 that we must ‘not, on account of these isolated cases, under- estimate the fact that the necessity for fertilization is predomi- nant, and controls, to their most secret depths, the sources of life in animals and plants.’ (Phys. d. Zeug. p. 160.) Hensen takes as his starting-point the fact that, among many animals, e.g. bees and wasps, parthenogenetic ova give rise to male individuals only, while in others, namely Psyche and Solenobia among Lepidoptera, and Apus, Artemia, and Limnadia among Crustacea, only females are thus produced; further, that in many Lepidoptera, as L7paris, single eggs possess a power of develop- ing without fertilization, but only into male insects, or into caterpillars which afterwards die, or in other cases only as far as some earlier or later phase of embryonic life. From this he concludes that we are here ‘ dealing with a graduated series of phenomena,’ ‘ with a gradation in the powers of development and of reproduction, that is of qualities which can be con- veniently included in the term ‘ sexual force” Hence at that time V. Hensen considered, if I have rightly understood him, that the ‘ sexual force,’ it is true, ordinarily reaches the egg by fertilization, but that it may, under certain conditions and in varying degrees, be included in the female germ-cells alone. Such ova can then undergo embryonic development without fertilization, and, according to the amount of contained ‘sexual force,’ can pass through a longer or shorter period of develop- ment; many reaching only a certain stage of segmentation, others the entire larval stage, while finally some may attain the condition of imago, with mature sexual organs. There are moreover various degrees of ‘sexual force’; for Hensen con- siders that male offspring are produced by a smaller force than females. Eggs from which, without fertilization, males only can arise (bees), possess, in his opinion, a smaller ‘sexual force’ than those which without fertilization produce females. This view ultimately depends on the conception of the life-preserving effect of fertilization, since males alone cannot perpetuate the species; and hence eggs which, without fertilization, give rise to males, are unable to maintain the con- tinuity of life, and would finally result in the disappearance of the species, just as eggs of still smaller ‘sexual force’ lead to the disappearance of the individual in the larval or even earlier embryonic stages. 110. AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [XIiIl. A question arising out of this view, and one which Hensen doubtfully propounds, is ‘whether the “sexual force” could increase to such an extent that males should become super- fluous, and whether parthenogenesis, like sexual reproduction, could continue, not only for a limited number of generations, but for an unending series. As regards an answer to these questions Hensen was quite unbiassed and awaited the decision of facts; moreover, from his point of view, no theoretical impossibility attended any such increase in the female ‘sexual force.’ He was, at that time, far nearer to the most recent views on fertilization than those numerous investigators who held parthenogenesis to be the consequence of fertilization which had taken place in earlier generations, and who considered that its effect could never last through an unlimited series of generations, but that the vitalizing or rejuvenating effect of fertilization must be renewed from time to time, or the power of reproduction would be lost. On these fundamental views as to the ‘ vitalizing of the germ by fertiliza- tion’ depends the reluctance of nearly all writers to recognise the submitted facts of a continuous and purely parthenogenetic reproduction, as for example in the case of the Ostracoda. It is certainly true that absolute proofs of the indefinite duration of this mode of reproduction cannot be obtained ; for unlimited time and innumerable generations are not within the limits of observation; but who doubts whether the sexual method, with which we are so completely familiar, and which is for this reason spoken of as the usual mode of reproduction,—who doubts whether this can endure without limit? And yet this assump- tion is as incapable of proof by appeal to experience as the other. It appears to be very difficult to get rid of the deeply rooted idea that fertilization is a vitalizing process, a ‘rejuvenescence of life,’ although we are quite unable to explain the nature of the renewal which is supposed to take place. The old idea of ‘vital force’ unconsciously bears a part in this view, an idea which certainly does not gain any scientific justification because, as Bunge has rightly said, we are to-day very far: from laying bare the deepest roots of any one of the processes of life and explaining it by the operation of known forces. I hardly think that we shall ever reach this point, but until the explanation of vital processes by means of the well-known chemical and physical properties XII.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. III of matter is proved to be impossible, it will, in my opinion, be unjustifiable for science to relinquish the attempt. The con- ception of vital force and the conception of fertilization as a renewal of life hang more closely together than we are in the habit of thinking. The facts of the transmission of hereditary tendencies from both parents to the child, together with the facts of partheno- genesis, induced me, at an early date, to look for the essence of fertilization, neither in the vitalization of the egg, nor in the union of two opposed polar forces, but rather in the fusion of two hereditary tendencies,—in the mingling of the peculiarities of two individuals. The substances which come together in fertilization, from the male and from the female, are not funda- mentally different but essentially similar, differing only in points of secondary importance. This is what I meant by the statement, made shortly after the discovery of the fundamental phenomena of fertilization, that the two germ-cells which unite together, are in the proportion of one to one, that is that they are essentially alike. If this conception be valid, the above-mentioned view as to the extrusion of polar bodies, propounded by Minot, Balfour, and E.van Beneden, must be erroneous; for a male principle such as their theory demands has no existence, and cannot therefore be expelled from the ovum. There is no male or female principle, but only a paternal and maternal substance. If, on the other hand, Minot’s Gonoblastid Theory be sound, it follows that my view, which finds the essence of fertilization in the union of the different hereditary tendencies of two indivi- duals, must be abandoned. It seemed to me possible to settle the question by means of parthenogenesis. If parthenogenetic eggs develope without first expelling polar bodies, then Minot’s theory, the ‘ compensa- tion theory’ as O. Hertwig has recently called it, receives material support: if however polar bodies are formed by them, it is impossible that such bodies can represent the male principle of the egg. I succeeded in proving the existence of a polar body, first in the ovum of a parthenogenetic Daphnid, Polyphemus oculus, and later, in conjunction with Ischikawa, in the parthenogenetic eggs of various other species of Daphnids, and also in some of the Ostracoda and Rotifera. Blochmann I12 AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [XII. showed the existence of a polar body in the parthenogenetic ova of the Aphidae, and there is now no doubt that polar bodies are formed in most if not in all parthenogenetic eggs. The ‘compensation theory’ must therefore be given up, and the question arises as to the theory which can take its place. Before the existence of polar bodies in parthenogenetic ova had been completely established, I had endeavoured to find, in opposition to the ‘compensation theory,’ another meaning in the polar bodies. The history of our earliest knowledge of the processes of nuclear division, by the work of Auerbach, Biitschli, Flemming, and others, is well known: the exist- ence of most remarkable and excessively minute arrangements for cell-division were shown to exist in the mysterious ‘ chro- matin substance’ of the nucleus, the so-called nuclear loops, which are accurately divided in a longitudinal plane, the halves then entering the two daughter nuclei which are being formed. These chromatin rods acquired a new significance when E. van Beneden first showed that they were contained in equal numbers in both the male and female reproductive cells, and that they arrange themselves side by side, to build up the chromatin substance of the embryonic nucleus. Considering this and certain other facts, it became more and more probable that the chromatin rods were the essential factors in fertilization, the sub- stance which was contributed by the parents and fused together in the offspring, and which was therefore, in all probability, the bearer of hereditary tendencies. Strasburger, O. Hertwig, and v. Kélliker also gave expression to this view for which I had contended. We regarded the nuclear loops as that idioplasm which Nageli had been led, by his acute reasoning, to suggest ; a substance which is not fluid, but organized, which possesses an extremely complex structure, and is transmitted from one generation to another. But this view did not decide the question whether the ovum was not, after all, vitalized by fertilization. O. Hertwig was obviously still under the influence of this idea when in 1885 he maintained in the above-mentioned work, that ‘the fertilizing substance transmits, at one and the same time, those peculiarities, which children inherit from their parents.’ Such an explanation is, in a certain sense, defensible, and we may speak of a ‘fer- tilizing substance,’ in so far as the amounts of nuclear material XII.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 113 which unite during fertilization seem to be necessary to determine the commencement of development. But this refers only to the restoration of a certain amount of nuclear substance, rendering its quantity sufficient for development, and parthenogenesis shows us that when the second polar body is absent this quantity can be supplied by a single sexual cell. In the precise meaning of the word, as it is ordinarily used, there is no such thing as a fertilizing substance, and the progress in thought from the old to the new doctrine of fertilization can only take place when the idea of such a substance in the old sense is completely aban- doned, and when it is recognized that fertilization has no signifi- cance except the union in the single offspring of the hereditary substance from two individuals. The advance which has occurred is due to Strasburger’s writings as well as my own: the former agreed with O. Hertwig and me as to the essential similarity, as regards their chief constituents, of the two sexual cells, and as to the secondary nature of their differences : Strasburger in fact went so far as to say that all differentiations of sex were simply the means adapted to bring together the two cell-nuclei which were necessary for the sexual act. With this view I not only entirely agreed, but totally rejected the pre-existing dynamic theory of fertilization, in as much as I could not recognize the object of fertilization as the ‘vitalization of the germ’ or the ‘reju- venescence of vital processes,’ but regarded it as simply the union of the different hereditary tendencies of two individuals. This union, which has hitherto been regarded, to some extent, as merely a necessary consequence, has become the important feature, while the ‘vitalization of the germ’ by the interaction of two opposed sexual cells,—formerly looked upon as the essential part of the process,—has declined from this high position and is regarded as only the means by which the process is effected. I was, at that time, so completely convinced that the facts warranted no other explanation, that I maintained that the nucleus of an ovum might be fertilized as fully by the nucleus of another ovum,—i.e. might be rendered equally capable of development,—as by thenucleus of a spermatozoon. The passage in which I advocated this view runs as follows :—‘ If it were possible to introduce the female pronucleus of an egg into another egg of the same species, immediately after the transfor- VOL. II. I 114. AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [ XII, mation of the nucleus of the latter into the female pronucleus, it is very probable that the two nuclei would conjugate just as if a fertilizing sperm-nucleus had penetrated. If this were so, the direct proof that egg-nucleus and sperm-nucleus are identical would be furnished.’! Boveri succeeded in accomplishing this a few years later, although he made use of the nuclei of two spermatozoa instead of those of the ova. I also hold, in opposition to the rejuvenescence theory, that there is no polar antithesis, and that, in the union which is the essence of fertilization, the nuclear loops contribute neither male nor female principle, but a paternal and maternal substance, and that the significance of fertilization is nothing more nor less than a mingling of the hereditary tendencies of father and mother. Il. Tue SIGNIFICANCE OF THE Process OF MATURATION OF THE GERM-CELLS. The Maturation of the Ovum. Relying on the views set forth above, I have made the attempt to substitute a new explanation of the formation of polar bodies in the animal ovum for that which has hitherto found acceptance, If that substance which is expelled from the ripe ovum in the polar bodies be not the male principle, what can it be? The cellular nature of the polar bodies has been demonstrated by Giard, Biitschli, and O. Hertwig; van Beneden has shown that they contain chromatin, and that at each of the two divi- sions which give rise to the two polar bodies, half of the chro- matosomes leave the egg in the nucleus of a polar body. If then the chromatin be the idioplasm, the material basis of here- dity, or, in other words, that substance which determines the nature and essence of the cell and its descendants, then cells of different kinds must contain correspondingly different varieties of idioplasm. Hence my theory of germ-plasm may be ex- pressed as follows :—The fertilized ovum contains germ-plasm in its nucleus, i.e. idioplasm endowed with the collective hereditary tendencies of the species: at each of the cell- divisions by means of which the ovum developes into the organism, this idioplasm splits into two quantitatively similar 1 Vol. I. pp. 252, 253. XII] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 115 halves in order to form the nuclei of the daughter-cells. But these halves are not always qualitatively alike; they are only so when they are to give rise to similar cells: when the cells which arise by division have a different significance in develop- ment, their idioplasm also differs in quality. The germ-plasm of the ovum is thus continually undergoing change during ontogeny, inasmuch as the developmental tendencies are being split up, and become more and more distributed among the members of successive cell generations, until finally each kind of cell in the body contains only that developmental tendency which corresponds with its specific histological character. Each specific cell is thus domi- nated by a specific idioplasm. As soon as I had arrived at this conclusion, it was easy and indeed inevitable to refer the differences between spermatozoon and egg-cell to a specific idioplasm which had stamped its peculiarities upon each cell. But since both male and female germ-cells contain the substance which fuses during fertilization to form the segmentation nucleus, and therefore germ-plasm, | concluded that a part of this true germ-plasm which forms the nuclear substance, splits off at the first ontogenetic stage, as specific sperm or egg idioplasm, which controls the germ-cell during its growth, and confers upon it a specific histological character. I sought for the meaning of the cell-division which results in the separation of the polar bodies, in the suggestion. that by this means the spermogenetic or ovogenetic idioplasm, rendered superfluous after the attainment of the specific form, was removed from the germ-cell, while the germ-plasm, grown in the mean time to a larger mass, remained behind in the cell. I therefore recognised in the cutting-off of the polar bodies the removal of histogenetic idioplasm from the germ-cells. While I was busy working out these interpretations, I dis- covered new facts which caused a modification of this view and led to the conclusion, which up to the present time appears to be sound, that the formation of polar bodies is a process for the reduction of the hereditary substance. The fact which led to this conclusion was the Jaw of the number of polar bodies,—the discovery that all animal eggs which require fertilization expel two polar bodies, one after the other, while all true parthenogenetic eggs give rise to one only. Now the ovogenetic idioplasm cannot, at the most, occupy more ie 116 AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [XIil. than the first polar body; the second must have some other meaning, for if I had been correct in assuming the necessity of the separation of the specific nucleoplasm from the egg, it follows that this substance must be separated as fully and com- pletely from the parthenogenetic as from the sexual egg. The second polar body must therefore possess a different meaning. In the fifth of the essays here collected ', I first indicated that this meaning is a reduction in the substance which forms the material basis of heredity, in that the number of the contained ancestral plasms are diminished by one-half during the halving of the nuclear substance to form the two daughter nuclei. By the term ancestral plasms, I referred to the separate kinds of germ-plasms from different ancestors which, according to my view, must be contained in the germ-plasm of each indi- vidual at the present day. If, before the introduction of sexual reproduction, the germ-plasm of each living being contained the developmental tendencies of ove individual only, its structure would be altered by sexual reproduction ; for after fertilization the different germ-plasms from two individuals would meet in the nucleus of the egg; furthermore, the number of these dif- ferent kinds or units of germ-plasm must necessarily have been doubled with each succeeding generation, so long, at least, as they could have divided, preparatory to fertilization, without relinquishing the power of giving rise, collectively, to the whole organism,—that is, until the units had reached the mini- mal limits of their mass. From this point onwards sexual re- production could only have been rendered possible either by a doubling of the nuclear substance, or since this was impossible, by a halving of the germ-plasm of both germ-cells before each act of fertilization, a halving which was not only quantitative, but was above all a separation of the contained individual units, a separation of ancestral germ-plasms, or briefly of ancestral plasms. Hence, after the discovery of the law of the number of polar bodies, I interpreted the first division of the nucleus as the re- moval of ovogenetic idioplasm from the egg, and the second as a halving of the number of ancestral units contained in the germ-plasm. Such halving must have occurred, or the number of ancestral units would have been doubled. It necessarily 1 Vol. I. pp. 257-342. XII.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 117 followed from this view that the ancestral units contained in the spermatozoa must also have undergone a diminution by half. I postulated therefore a reduction of the spermatozoa by divi- sion, and, to my mind, there was ‘no doubt’ that this process occurred in them ‘at some time and by some means’, although not perhaps in the same manner as in the ova. I even said from the very first” that ‘it is quite conceivable’ that this division might occur in a manner entirely different from that of the egg, since in the former case both daughter-cells might be of similar size and might become spermatozoa, in which case neither of them would shrink and become polar bodies. The Maturation of the Spermatozoon. I have not been able to make out, by my own investigations, the facts which confirm the soundness of these views as to the spermatozoa; my impaired eyesight, which has so often puta stop to microscopic investigations, has again rendered the con- tinuation of this research impossible. But Oscar Hertwig* has recently given us an account of the development of the sperma- tozoa of Ascaris megalocephala, which not only proves the reduction of the male germ-cells by division, but also shows that it takes place in precisely that way, which from the first I had regarded as most likely. Since these new facts affect our conclusions with regard to many aspects of the process of fertilization, they are here shortly abstracted. They may possibly enable us to penetrate still more deeply into the meaning and significance of the processes by which the nuclei of germ-cells are reduced in size. Ever since Edouard van Beneden’s classical researches on the process of fertilization, it has been well known that Ascaris megalocephala is one of the most favourable objects for the observation of the minute arrangements and changes occurring in the nuclei of germ-cells. The nuclear loops are not only relatively very large, but are also very few in number. Boveri was the first to show that, as regards this number, two varieties of the species exist, one containing two nuclear loops in the young germ-cells, the other containing four. O. Hertwig then , Vol. I, p. 38t. *Vol.I.. p:, 385. 3 O. Hertwig, ‘ Ueber Ei- islig? Samenbildung bei Nematoden,’ Archiv f. mikr. Anat. 1890. 118 AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [XII. proved, as might have been expected, that this difference in the number of loops in the youngest germ-cells exists also in the male sex. He called the variety which produces two loops Var. univalens, and that which produces four Var. bivalens. Since the development of the spermatozoa in both varieties differs only in the number of nuclear loops which are formed, I will, is) ° 80099 a) le) 040,0 Mie. 1 Formation of spermatozoa in Ascaris megalocephala, var. bivalens (modi- fied from O. Hertwig). A. Primitive sperm-cells. 8. Sperm-mother-cells. C. First ‘reducing division.’ 2. The two daughter-cells. £. Second ‘reducing division.’ /. The four grand-daughter cells,—the sperm-cells. in the following account, deal with only one of them, the Var. bivalens. The formation of the spermatozoa falls into three stages; the first is that of the ‘primitive sperm-cells’ : these youngest male germ-cells then proceed to increase by means of successive divisions. The division of the nucleus is effected by karyokinesis after the usual manner; the four nuclear loops split longitudinally and the halves form the two daughter-nuclei. After this process XII.) CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 119 of multiplication has lasted for a considerable time, the cells pass into the second stage,—that of the ‘mother-cells of sperma- tozoa.” They cease to multiply, grow considerably, and their nuclei pass into the resting condition, viz. the condition of a nuclear network into which the loops break up. When these cells have reached their full size they enter upon the preparation for fresh divisions, which are only two in number and rapidly follow each other. As soon as these are over, the whole development is complete. It is this last stage which brings about the ‘reducing division’ which I had predicted. The finely divided chromatin bodies contained in the nuclear network build up eight long, thin rods or threads, which afterwards shorten and form thicker rods, arranged by means of the pole-cor- puscles or centrosomata, which act in such a manner that four rods are turned toward one pole and four toward the other. A division of the nucleus and of the cell now follows resulting in the formation of two daughter-cells, each of which contains as many nuclear loops as the original sperm-cells, i.e. four. This division is followed immediately by another on the same plan, but without any intervening resting stage: the number of nuclear rods is therefore again halved, so that each daughter- cell of the second order contains but two. Hence the number of nuclear rods is at first increased from four to eight, and then by two consecutive divisions, this latter number is first halved and then quartered, the final result being a halving of the number of rods in the original sperm-cells. It is well known that precisely the same results are brought about by those divisions of the ovum which give rise to the polar bodies. In the egg the nuclear rods are first doubled and then, by two consecutive divisions, reduced to half their original number. In all essentials, the development of the ovum passes through precisely the same process as that of the spermatozoa. The first two stages, described by O. Hertwig, in the develop- ment of the spermatozoa I also find in the formation of the egg. The primitive ova correspond to the primitive sperm-cells, the mother-cell of the ova, or the mature full-sized egg, immediately before reduction by division, corresponds to the mother-cell of the spermatozoa, the only difference being that the egg in this, the second stage, has, as a rule, attained its definite shape and size and is surrounded by its membranes, and that the two last 120 AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [XI divisions, whichare together spoken of as the ‘reducing divisions,’ generally take place after the egg has been laid or has, at any rate, left the ovary. This probably explains, as I have already maintained, why the division is so unequal, and why all the daughter-cells cannot become ova, but only the largest of them, viz. that one which alone contains the food-material necessary for the building up of the embryo. 0000 OOS 790% 09,0 ¢ f Csoe see °. LO. os Fans Px) Ly 0'6/0° 6 EX) 0-60 Fig. II. Formation of ova in Ascaris megalocephala, var. bivalens. In other respects the formation of the polar bodies corres- ponds with the two divisions of the mother-cells of sperma- tozoa: in both cases there are two successive cell-divisions, and furthermore in the egg both daughter-cells of the first generation divide again—not only the larger one, the ovum, but also the smaller or first polar body—for it is well known that XIl.] CON¥UGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 121 the latter body generally splits into two secondary polar bodies, and the significance of this apparently aimless division has hitherto been sought in vain. But now we see that it depends on the persistence of a phyletic stage of development, on the survival of an earlier condition, in which the original egg-cells underwent a ‘reducing division,’ like that of the spermatozoa, producing four cells, each of which was potentially an ovum. Moreover in another, and obviously a decisive point, the ‘ re- ducing divisions’ of ova and spermatozoa are in correspondence ; —in the manner and method of the division of the nuclear rods in the daughter-nuclei. The process of karyokinesis here differs from any other mode of nuclear division, in that there is no longitudinal splitting or doubling of the nuclear rods, bringing about a contribution from each rod in the equatorial plate to both daughter-nuclei ; instead of this, half the whole number of rods passes to one pole of the nuclear spindle, and half to the other. Furthermore, there is no resting-stage between the two divi- sions, during which the rods break up into the nuclear network, but the two divisions follow each other without any interval. If the ‘reducing division,’ for which I have argued, has any exist- ence, we must look for it here; for, so far as proofs can be afforded by observation, they are forthcoming. The number of nuclear rods is reduced to half, and hence the mass of the nuclear substance is certainly halved. And if we must concede that the rods in a nucleus are not absolutely alike, but are derived from the differing germ-plasms of various ancestors (viz. that the rods consist of such different kinds of germ- plasm), it follows that a reduction of the ancestral germ-plasms is admitted. The new facts discovered by O. Hertwig leave only one point obscure. We see indeed that, in the case of the spermatozoon as in that of the ovum, the nuclear rods are reduced to half, but we ask in vain why two successive divisions are necessary to bring about this reduction, when it seems that a single one would suffice. I had formerly concluded that since partheno- genetic eggs expel only one polar body, instead of the two which separate from all ova requiring fertilization, the first division must have a different significance from the second. I regarded the second division alone as the ‘ reducing division,’ and this was a perfectly sound and logical conclusion, so long as it remained 122 AMPHIMIXTS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [XIl. unknown that the mother-cells of ova contain twice as many nuclear rods as existed in the primitive egg-cells. Until this was known, the ‘reducing division’ was only required to effect a halving of the nuclear substance, and for this purpose one division would be sufficient. We now know that a second division is rendered necessary because the number of the rods is doubled before the process of reduction has begun. The object served by this doubling remains an obscure point upon which even the spermatogenesis of Ascaris does not at present enlighten us. My previous interpretation of the first polar body as the removal of ovogenetic nucleoplasm from the egg must fall to the ground: about this there is no possible doubt, but how can we better explain the necessity for two divisions? Why should the nuclear substance be doubled, only to be halved again? O. Hertwig has also propounded this question, but so far without being able to supply an answer. He hopes that a more accurate study of the manner and method of the arrangement of the chromatin elements in the two succes- sive divisions will ultimately lead to a deeper knowledge of the essence of the whole process of maturation. I also hope the same. The processes which bring about the doubling of the chromatin rods in the resting nuclei of ova and sperm-mother- cells, contain, without doubt, the key to an understanding of the necessity for this increase in number, which at present appears to be so mysterious and superfluous. Whether unaided observation will ever succeed in making clear the accessory processes, in other words, whether morpho- logical events can be followed in minute detail so far that we can wrest from them the secret of their meaning, we cannot say. Without some guiding idea, it is scarcely possible that the observations of investigators could be directed to the most essential part of the process, especially in this case, where differences of substance are probably present — differences which might be invisible, but are perhaps capable of being inferred by processes of reasoning. Thus it may be possible, on the basis of Hertwig’s observa- tions, to penetrate somewhat deeper into the meaning of the remarkable processes which attend the ‘ reducing divisions,’ if only the subject be attacked from the point of view of the theory of ancestral germ-plasms. XII.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 123 The Double Division of the Nuclear Substance in the Formation of Germ-cells. With regard to the egg, the following question can be for- mulated—What is the meaning of the first division in the formation of polar bodies, since the second alone would suffice to halve the nuclear substance? With regard to the sperm- mother-cell however the question must run,—why should division take place twice, when its single occurrence would have sufficed to reduce the nuclear loops by one half? The simplest answer to these two questions is to be found in the fact that the number of nuclear rods is doubled at the beginning of the reducing process, and must therefore be quartered if a diminution to one half the normal number be the ultimate necessity. This leads us to enquire why the preliminary doubling of the nuclear rods is necessary. Regarding spermatogenesis only, it might be maintained that here we are simply dealing with a process for increasing the number of spermatozoa as far as possible, but if we attempt ‘hus to explain a fourfold instead of a twofold increase, com- parison with the egg-mother-cell, producing four descendants of which one only undergoes development, renders any further discussion of this idea superfluous. In attempting to explain the phenomenon I start from the conception which led me to the idea of a ‘reducing division,’ i.e. the building up of the germ-plasm, that is the active sub- stance of the nuclear rods, from innumerable ancestral units As | explained on the first statement of this idea, it is a view which is necessarily suggested if we accept certain premisses, the chief of which is, that the hereditary substance from the two parents does not altogether become one during the fusion which occurs at fertilization, but that each retains a certain independence. This agrees with observed facts in so far that, as a result of fertilization, the paternal and maternal rods come to lie close to one another in the same nucleus, but undergo no true fusion into a single mass. If we assume that this remains true during the whole ontogeny, we can only suppose that half the nuclear rods of every cell are paternal and half maternal and that both these simultaneously influence the cell. We do not yet understand how this takes place, and must for the present dis- 124. AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING. OF {[XII. miss the question ; we do know however that it is an actual fact. We know that the paternal no less than the maternal nuclear rods of the fertilized ovum possess the developmental tendencies of the species, and that either of them alone, that is in the absence of the other, are present in sufficient numbers to regulate the development of the egg, each set containing all that is necessary to originate a mature individual of the species. And the same fact holds good for each successive stage of embryogeny, with just this difference, that the potentiality of stages to come, and not of those passed through, is contained in the embryonic cells. Furthermore every cell contains the separate paternal and maternal nuclear rods, and either set is capable of producing all the subsequent stages. This remains true throughout the whole course of development, from the fertilized ovum which produces the parent, to the male and female germ-cells of the offspring. No real fusion of the two nuclear substances into a single mass ever takes place, so that the corresponding predispositions of the two parents are ar- ranged together, but the hereditary substance contributed by the father remains separate from that contributed by the mother. These substances are made up of units of which each contains those collective predispositions which are indispensable for the building up of an individual, but each possesses an individual character, i.e. they are not entirely alike. I have called such units ancestral plasms, and I conceive that they are con- tained, in larger or smaller number, in the chromatin of the mature germ-cells of living organisms, viz. that the parental nuclear rods are made up of a certain number of these. I have thus briefly called to mind the manner in which I conceive that many such ancestral plasms are collected together in a single nuclear mass, and the consequent necessity for a ‘reducing division.’ It is not perhaps superfluous to return to this subject once more. Each of the parental germ-plasms which, at the phyletic origin of sexual reproduction, for the first time fused together in the segmentation nucleus of the offspring must have contained the potentiality of one individual only, and must have been, in a certain sense, completely homogeneous. Naturally, such a statement by no means excludes the existence, of a very complicated structure, in which a number of different predispositions, or of different parts, are collected together, but XIl.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION, 125 it limits each such predisposition to being present only once, and in only one variety. I conceive of this primitive germ-plasm, as of one single ancestral unit of an existing species, only perhaps relatively larger, its separate predispositions not having been yet reduced to the present minimum. All this however was altered in the germ-cells of the first sexually produced individual, in which the nuclear rods of the two parents came together, and together composed the heredi- tary substance of the child. If now, as has been argued above, the paternal and maternal hereditary substances did not fuse but only arranged themselves side by side, there will be found, in the germ-cells of the child, two substances similar as regards the species but dissimilar as regards the individual. If the mass of nuclear substance cannot be increased, both kinds of nuclear substance must be reduced by one half. If we imagine the nuclear material of one such germ-cell to consist of a single thread, one half of it would be made up of paternal and the other half of maternal germ-plasm. I call to mind the diagram by which, in an earlier essay}, I endeavoured to make intelligible how the number of ancestral plasms of various kinds which meet together in the germ- plasm are doubled in each successive generation, and how, in the formation of the germ-cells of each generation, the germ-plasms must be reduced to half their size, or their united mass would be doubled in every generation. But in time a limit to this continuous diminution of the ancestral plasms must have been set, and this would occur when the amount of substance necessary to contain all the predispositions of the individual had reached its minimum. Obviously these units cannot become infinitely minute; however small they may be they must always retain a certain size. This follows from the extremely complicated structure which we must with- out any doubt ascribe to them. These units which make up the germ-plasm of living animals I have called ancestral plasms, but my views about them have been misunderstood, and I have been treated as though I had applied the term to the ultimate biological units of idioplasm. Nothing was further from my mind: I look upon the single ancestral plasms as extremely complex, and built up of countless biological units. I have 1 Vol. I. p. 369. 126 . AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF {XiI1. retained the conception in its original form, as it is indispensable for the understanding of the ‘reducing division.’ When I main- tained that the units of the germ-plasm are indivisible, I did not refer to mechanical divisibility, but to that division which a unit cannot undergo without losing its original character. If we divide a dog into two parts, neither part is a dog; and so, accord- ing to my views, half an ancestral plasm is not an ancestral plasm, is not an hereditary unit capable of calling forth a com- plete individual; or, to express this with reference to its minute structure, a half would no longer contain all the predispositions necessary for the whole individual. The number of these units would be doubled as the result of each fresh fertilization if the preliminary halving did not occur. Hence the necessity for such halving, which I have attempted te render clear by the foregoing train of thought. Taking my stand upon this, I argued that a ‘ reducing division’ of the nuclear material takes place before fertilization in both germ-cells,—that is a division contrary to the ordinary method, in that it does not divide the collective ancestral plasms in two equal and similar groups between the daughter-nuclei, as in ‘ equal divisions?” but halves their number so that one daughter nucleus receives one set and the other another set of ancestral plasms. In the ovum I recognised the necessary ‘reducing division’ in the formation of the second polar body, for it had then been shown by the careful observations of van Beneden and Carnoy upon Ascaris megalocephala that two out of the four nuclear rods pass into the second polar body while the other two compose the nucleus of the ovum. The idea of a ‘reducing division,’ as I then conceived it, seems to have met with but little acceptance among the German biologists. Except Platner and recently O. Hertwig and Henking, I know of no one who has accepted it. The first- named employed the expression, but without indicating whether he used it in my sense. This cannot be taken for granted, as the simple halving of the chromatin mass may be so designated. All that we can see is a reduction in mass,,and the discoveries of Platner and Hertwig do not directly teach us more than that in the division of the mother- 1 For a further account of these methods of division see Vol. I. pp. 369-377. XII.| CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION, 127 cell the number of nuclear rods, and therefore the mass of hereditary substance, is reduced to one-half. O. Hertwig appears to accept my views as set forth above: at any rate he thinks that I am ‘on the right road in regarding the process by which the second polar body is formed as a reducing process, by means of which an amount of germ-plasm is removed, equal to that which is afterwards conferred by the nucleus of the spermatozoon.’ Furthermore, his own account of the significance of the process seems to agree with mine when he says—‘ In this very simple way it is brought about that the fusion of the two nuclei resulting from the sexual act,—a union of the chro- matin substance and the chromatin elements,—does not form double the mass which is normal for the species concerned.’ When, however, we remember that O. Hertwig rejects the theory of ancestral plasms, and takes the antagonistic view of a complete mingling of maternaland paternal germ-plasm,we must be convinced that the reducing process, in the sense in which I have spoken of it, has no existence for Hertwig, and that, from his standpoint, the only conceivable theory is that of a simple reduction of mass. And yet obviously such is not his view, for he speaks of chromatin elements; and hence the question arises as to the kind of elements which these can be if they are not ancestral plasms. It seems to me that the reducing process only acquires a meaning when taken in connection with the supposition of ancestral plasms, unless indeed it is merely a matter of reduction of mass. But it is most improbable that a mere reduction in mass is the object of this very remark- able double division of the nuclear substance, which is never again repeated in the whole developmental history of the animal. First, the mass of nuclear substance is doubled, and then reduced by two divisions to one-half its original bulk. Obviously it would have been simpler if this process had been omitted, and if the nuclear substance of the egg and sperm- mother-cell had, during its growth, merely stopped short at the requisite size. It may perhaps be objected that the growth of the ovum and sperm-mother-cell and their histological structure necessitate such a mass of nuclear substance. We know little or nothing about the relationship of the mass of nuclear matter to the mass of the cell-body, but it must be doubted whether in this case the relation is fixed, because 128 AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF (XII. as a rule ova and spermatozoa differ so enormously in size, and above all because the ova of different species vary so greatly in this respect. Moreover, Boveri has shown us that in one and the same species two otherwise indistinguish- able germ-cells exist, one of which contains twice as many nuclear rods as the other, and therefore as far as we can tell twice the amount of nuclear substance. Hence the ‘reducing division’ cannot be a mere division of mass. There remain for consideration the ‘chromatin elements’ of O. Hertwig. What are these elements? Are they the smallest possible portions of living matter, something like the pangenes of de Vries? This distinguished botanist in his highly sug- gestive and thoughtful writings has developed the idea that the nuclear substance of the fertilized ovum is composed of count- less very minute particles, called by him pangenes. He thus recalls Darwin’s pangenesis, with which his theory has some- thing in common. These pangenes however do not, like the gemmules of Darwin, give rise to cells, but they are the bearers of the various qualities of cells. If we now assume with de Vries that the nuclear substance of germ-cells consists of innu- merable kinds of such pangenes, we may regard these either as uniformly mixed together without any kind of arrangement, or as arranged in a definite order. In the first case, each division (reduction) of the mass would only result in a diminu- tion, and the components of both halves would remain the same : the various kinds of ‘chromatin elements’ would not by this means be reduced to half, but all the elements would be contained in each portion. Butif these pangenes were arranged in a regular order in the germ-plasm, and if with Hertwig we designate the groups of these as predispositions, without ex- pressing in any way how such predispositions can be conceived, it follows that a halving of the mass of germ-plasm or nuclear substance would give rise to two halves, neither of which would contain all the predispositions necessary for the con- struction of an individual, although both might contain many double predispositions. Hertwig imagines that the predisposi- tions which according to his view (loc. cit. p. 110) are present in the germ-plasm of the paternal and maternal germ-cells, mingle together, and de Vries has also assumed this. Hertwig states that ‘it is not improbable,’ that in the complete union XII.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 129 and mingling of the parent nuclear substances presupposed by him, ‘similar predispositions would arrange themselves closer to one another than dissimilar ones, and from the similar but varying paternal and maternal predispositions an intermediate form might arise by mutual influence.’ I have printed the words ‘intermediate form’ in italics because it appears that so much depends upon it; for obviously the intermediate form of predisposition must be looked upon as ome and no longer as two separate predispositions. Hence, according to Hertwig, the fusion of two parental germ-plasms produces an inter- mediate form of germ-plasm 7x which each predisposition its not doubled, but remains single. Furthermore, this germ-plasm could grow, and could be represented by a larger or smaller mass, but it is impossible that it could be halved without losing its character as germ-plasm, except it were first doubled in size, and all its predispositions were doubled and sym- metrically arranged on each side of the plane of division like the antimeres in a bilaterally symmetrical animal. But even in this last case a ‘reducing division,’ that is a putting on one side of half the number of the corresponding but individually distinct chromatin elements, is impossible because both halves would contain precisely similar predispositions. O. Hertwig deceives himself in believing that he can assume a halving of the number of chromatin elements while his conception of the composition of the germ-plasm only admits of a halving of mass. In his germ-plasm, made by the fusion of paternal and maternal predispositions, there are no differing predispositions of one and the same part or organ: the parental differences have, according to his view, neutralized each other, and each predis- position is present as a single intermediate variety. Whence comes the necessity or the possibility of any reduction? What are the units which are to be reduced in number? It is clear that we cannot avoid the assumption of higher units of germ-plasm, each one of which contains, collected together, the varied predispositions of the species, whether called by my term ancestral plasm, or by any other name. I shall attempt to explain elsewhere that this conception is not only in- dispensable for our understanding of the ‘reducing division,’ but that it is even rendered necessary by the phenomena of heredity. At present I do not propose to do more than show that the FOL, Il. K 130 . AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL. MEANING OF [XII. idea of a ‘ reducing division’ presupposes the multiplication of the equivalent but individually characterized units in the germ- plasm of the fertilized egg, and that, without this presupposition, the ‘reducing division’ is entirely devoid of meaning. If we may now feel greater certainty than ever before in regarding the double division of the egg and sperm-mother-cell as a ‘reducing division,’ we gain at the same time further proofs that the germ-plasm is composed ‘of ancestral plasms, that is of hereditary units of a higher order, each one of which, if it alone dominated the ovum, would be capable of guiding the whole ontogeny and of producing a complete individual of the species. Before I attempt to show how these fundamental views throw new light on the discoveries of recent years, I will say a few words on the independence of the maternal and paternal chromatosomes. | According to the views which I have expressed, the nuclear. rods are built up of a series of ancestral plasms, which are not intimately connected together, but so far as mere position is concerned, are arranged next to one another. A rod does not represent a kind of ‘individuality ’ (Boveri), by which term there is certainly implied the existence of an internal relation- ship of parts to one another, according to certain laws, a relationship which prevents any mechanical division of the whole into equivalent parts capable of living and performing, their functions. ‘Individualities’ as defined above are to be found in my ancestral plasms, or as I propose to call them shortly, the ‘/ds’!. These cannot be divided without losing the power of building up an individual, while, according to my view, the series of ancestral plasms which compose the rods or ‘Jdants? might quite conceivably be removed bodily, by division occurring at any spot, and replaced by others, without any loss of the essential force which controls the ontogeny of the species in question. The only result of such replace- ment would be to cause a more or less marked alteration in 1 The expressions Jd and Jdant serve to recall Nageli’s ‘idioplasm,’ from which they are derived. I think it is very necessary to substitute some short expressions for the clumsy ‘ancestral plasms’ and ‘ chromato- somes,’ or the frequently inappropriate ‘nuclear rods’ and ‘nuclear loops.’ * See the preceding note. XUl.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 131 the individuality of the being which is produced by this ontogeny. There is therefore, in my opinion, nothing inadmissible in the idea of the breaking up of the chromatin rods or idants, during each nuclear resting stage, if only the single ids remain un- changed; but certain facts in heredity, to be mentioned imme- diately, support the view that the specific hereditary substance from one or both parents can be contained in the germ-cells of the child, and this presupposes that it is at least possible and perhaps the rule, for the order and arrangement of the ids in the idants to remain unchanged from the germ-cells of the parent to those of the offspring. I would, then, assume that, at least on the way from germ-cell to germ-cell, the views of van Beneden and Boveri are upon the whole correct, viz. that the chromatosomes (idants) only apparently break up during the nuclear resting stage, but in reality persist. I imagine that, after the period of the resting stage, they are generally composed of the same ids, for the most part arranged in series similar to those which existed before the preceding nuclear division. We are already acquainted with such astonishingly delicate mechanical arrangements in cells, that the existence of special provision for maintaining the original arrangement of the rod elements (ids) might be looked upon as very far from an impossibility. Even if direct observation should fail to answer this question in the future, some certainty might be reached by those indirect means which often lead us to a final decision in such excessively minute biological questions—viz. the means provided by an examination of the facts of heredity. Even now there is, I think, one such fact, supporting the idea of a continuity of the idants ; I mean the frequently observed fact that a child may pre- dominantly or even exclusively resemble one of its parents alone. If the elements of the chromatin rods, 1. e. the ancestral plasms, were irregularly mingled together in each nuclear resting stage, to be rearranged at random in the idants, it would scarcely ever happen that the scattered ids would come together in a series like that which existed in the original paternal or maternal idants. The individual stamp ofa nuclear rod (idant) must entirely depend upon its construction out of particular ids. Nevertheless, we must not regard this constitution as for ever unchangeable. The universally observed change of indivi- K 2 132 AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [XIl. duality which takes place in the course of generations, and the fact that one and the same individuality is never twice repeated, suggest to my mind an occasional change in the arrangement of ids within the idants—a change which, if it does not occur at every opportunity afforded by reconstruction, will at any rate take place in the course of generations. I will not now enter more fully into the foundation of such protracted, and, to acertain extent, secular changes of the idants, but will turn at once to the problem propounded above as to the meaning and significance of the fact, which has been firmly established by the researches of O. Hertwig upon Ascaris, that a double division of nucleus and cell is rendered necessary by that reduction of idioplasmic elements which is required by my theory in both ovum and sperm-cell; in other words, ¢o explain the fact that the number of idants ts doubled before being halved. Inasmuch as two primary polar bodies are formed, so far as we know, by all eggs which require fertilization, we may con- clude that the significance of the double division of the sperm- mother-cell of Ascaris megalocephala is typical and far- reaching, rather than merely accessory or secondary. If, as I have shown above, the significance of the original increase of the chromatin rods to double their number does not lie in the needs of the growing ovum or spermatozoon, it must be sought for in some other direction. J¢ hes, as I believe, in the attempt to bring about as intimate a mixture as possible of the hereditary units of both father and mother’. If the first object of sexual reproduction is to combine the hereditary tendencies of two individuals, and not in a mere transitory manner (viz. in the single individual proceeding from one act of fertilization), but permanently, because such a combination affects also the germ-cells of each single indi- vidual, and therefore of all succeeding generations,—if this be its object, then we must admit that it is mechanically pos- sible for a combination of paternal and maternal idants to exist side by side in the mature germ-cells of the individual. This is obviously conceded if the ‘reducing division’ makes 1 Histologists may perhaps object that the doubling of the idants simply depends upon a postponement of the normal longitudinal fission until the time at which the spindle is formed. This is probably correct, but it only explains the existence of the doubling and not its significance. XII.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 133 no difference between the maternal and paternal nuclear rods, but leads to a halving of their number in such a manner that the most varied combinations can arise; so that if a+4, and c+d represent four rods, there will be found in the mature germ-cell not only the paternal group a+ 6 and the maternal c+ d, but also the combination a+c and 6+d or a+d and 6+ XIL.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL KEPRODUCTION. 211 otherwise inevitable death, we ought to find it as a fundamental process, occurring without a single exception. It is hardly necessary to say that this is not the case. Least of all ought its appearance to depend obviously upon external conditions of life. But this is certainly the case; the periodicity of its appearance can be proved to depend upon adaptation. In many thousands of species of the higher animals amphi- mixis invariably makes its appearance at the outset of every generation, for no egg can develope without fertilization. This is true of the whole Vertebrate sub-kingdom. Isolated excep- tions to this general law suddenly begin to appear in the group of the Arthropods. Certain eggs, in which we should have thought fertilization would be the necessary preliminary to development, have gained the power of developing un- aided,— viz. the power of producing males alone (bees), while the same eggs, if fertilized, would produce females. In plant-lice, on the other hand, females emerge from unferti- lized ova, and not one generation only, but two, three, and even many, succeed each other before a sexual generation occurs and, with it, amphimixis. How far this latter is from being a process of multiplication, and how superficial is the connexion which usually obtains between amphimixis and multiplication, are shown in the bark-lice, e.g. Phylloxera. In these it has already been mentioned that the sexual generation consists of minute animals devoid of mouth and of the power of taking food. The female lays a single egg, so that, as in the primitive form of conjugation, the number of individuals is not increased by reproduction, but diminished by half. Nature could hardly express with greater clearness the stress which she lays on amphimixis; nor could she argue in a more convinc- ing way that increase is distinct from amphimixis, and that the quickening of new germs need not be dependent upon the latter. If amphimixis were a process of rejuvenescence we could hardly believe that its occurrence in the life of a species would be so excessively fluctuating,—sometimes taking place in each generation, sometimes recurring after a lapse of two, three, or even as many as ten generations, sometimes being absent for forty generations, as I have proved to be the case in Cypris reptans. It might be suggested that the recurrence of amphimixis does not depend on the number of generations of P 2 212 AMPHIMIXTS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [XIl. individuals, but on the number of cell-generations, and that continuous life is rendered possible by the reappearance of amphimixis after each million or hundred thousand generations of cells. We might also—as I have already mentioned—com- pare the ‘agamic’ cell-generations of Infusoria, which follow each other between two periods of conjugation, with the collec- tion of cells composing the person of a Metazoon, and regard the ontogenetic cell-series, as a whole, as the equivalent of the millions of individuals which make up an Infusorian colony. In both these cases the rejuvenating and quickening influence of amphimixis may be supposed to endure for a certain number of cell-generations. I must admit that I consider such reasoning to be bad ‘philosophy of nature,’ i.e. playing with words which convey no distinct meaning. It is contradicted by the fact that the cell-cycle of ontogeny in the lowest representative of the Vertebrata, the Amphioxus, cannot be compared as to length with that of the higher members of the group; it is equally disproved by the phenomena of cyclical development, showing that in one case the effects of fertilization may extend through one ontogeny, in another through two, three, six, or even ten ontogenies, not to mention the case in which forty generations have elapsed without the occurrence of amphimixis. If we regard amphimixis as an adaptation of the highest importance, the phenomena can be explained in a simple way. I only assume that amphimixis is of advantage in the phyletic development of life, and furthermore that it is beneficial in maintaining the level of adaptation, which has been once attained, in every single organism; for this is as dependent upon the continuous activity of natural selection as the coining of new species. According to the frequency with which amphimixis recurs in the life of a species, is the efficiency with which the species is maintained; since so much the more easily will it adapt itself to new conditions of life, and thus become modified. Amphimixis must first have appeared among unicellular or- ganisms in the form in which we now find it in most Protozoa (Flagellata, Sporozoa, Rhizopoda)—namely, as the complete fusion of two entire animals‘. 1 Maupas (op. cit. p. 492) attributes to me the view that conjugation bears a different significance in the lower Protozoa from that which it possesses in the higher, and he describes this ‘maniére de voir’ as XII.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 213 Since this process is in direct antagonism to reproduction, i.e. increase, it can only be repeated after long intervals, lest it should prevent the sufficient increase of a colony of such animals. Hence we find that conjugation recurs periodically among the Protozoa; and indeed-—as Maupas has taught us in the Infuso- ria—only repeats itself after a great many (120-300) generations. Amphimixis, as we have seen, only became possible among Metazoa by concentrating or packing all the predispositions into the restricted area supplied by the nuclear substance of a single cell,—and this must happen even when the adult body is com- posed of millions of cells, differentiated in the most diverse directions, and combined to form tissues, organs, and systems. The result of this arrangement is seen in a highly complex ontogeny; and it is obvious that many conditions of life may arise which render it advantageous that the increase of the species should not proceed exclusively by this long and intricate, and therefore dangerous road, and that accordingly the origin of each new individual should not be necessarily bound up with amphimixis. In this way we are able to understand the wide distribution and diverse forms of asexual reproduction among the lower Metazoa and in plants. There is, however, another factor,—the appearance, in the two last-mentioned groups, of that complex form of individuality known as the stock. This is brought about by the budding or division of the person, a form of increase which renders possible a continuity of the persons proceeding from one another. Such increase is not associated with amphimixis, because the indis- ‘superficielle,’ etc. I have never held such a view; the only passage in my writings which can have given rise to such a misapprehension deals with the phyletic origin of conjugation (‘ Bedeutung der sexuellen Fort- pflanzung, p. 52, translated in vol. i, see pp. 293-204). Anyone who refers to this passage will find a hypothesis, expressed with all reserve, suggesting the original significance of the fusion of two unicellular organisms. Conjugation must have had some beginning, and although I believe that in its present form it signifies a source of variability, it must originally have had some other meaning, for two Monera would scarcely coalesce in order to ensure variability in their descendants. A change of function, must have taken place, or, as Dohrn has very clearly expressed it, a secondary effect associated with the original main effect has, at a later date, usurped the place of the latter. Maupas accepts conjugation in the form in which it exists, and makes no attempt to understand how it originated. I do not blame him for this, but is it - really so superficial to investigate the origin of any phenomenon? 214 AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [XII. pensable mechanical conditions are wanting. Hence, in the formation of stocks, amphimixis does not appear in every generation of persons, but only periodically in certain genera- tions, and from this follows an alternation between two methods of increase, viz. with and without amphimixis, or, as it is called, an alternation of generation. Many principles come into action in this mode of development, which we cannot stop to consider, above all the gradual development of high individualisation in the stock, through the differentiation of its persons on the prin- ciple of division of labour, as was expounded many years ago, in a most convincing manner, by Rudolph Leuckart. We can furthermore understand why a longer or shorter series of generations elapses before amphimixis becomes asso- ciated with increase: a long interval is the necessary conse- quence of the formation of highly differentiated animal stocks. I need hardly say that I do not, by any means, intend to imply that no change in the method of reproduction can have arisen without stock-formation. In the groups of polypes and medusae, among which the above-mentioned alternation of generation is so widely spread, we find species which do not - form stocks, and which, after passing through a series of gene- rations by fission or budding, return to the method of sexual reproduction. It is clear that in such cases, the omission of a detailed and dangerous embryogeny, together with the more rapid multiplication which accompanies the omission, has been the efficient cause which has limited amphimixis to certain generations. The fresh-water polype, Hydra, is an example of this. The duration of the ‘agamic’ period is so regulated by the external conditions of life that the concentration of the collective predispositions of the species in a single cell, which is associated with amphimixis, is at the same time made use of to form a resting-egg, which carries the species over the unfavourable seasons. The adoption of entirely different methods by closely allied animals shows how little the existence and duration of the periods of asexual reproduction have to do with the number of cells composing a single individual. In one and the same group of Hydromedusae we find species with long periods of asexual reproduction side by side with others in which it has entirely disappeared, so that every generation proceeds from fertilized XI] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 215 eggs, and is therefore under the direct influence of amphimixis. It is well known that some Medusae are budded off from a polype-stock, and constitute the sexual generation of the latter, marking the end of a series of asexual generations; while other Medusae invariably arise from fertilized ova, and always produce eggs requiring fertilization, or, in other words, adapted for amphimixis. | The degree of organisation is, in yet another way, associated with the alternation of asexual with sexual generations, and thus with the periodicity of amphimixis. This new relationship between organisation and the recurrence of amphimixis, depends upon the fact that the asexual methods of reproduction by fission or budding are not possible in the highest and most complex Metazoa. They are only found in the lower groups of Metazoa, —the Coelenterates, Worms, and Echinoderms; disappearing in the Arthropods, Molluscs, and Vertebrates. In these latter, we might well suppose that every act of increase would be connected with amphimixis; for,—since the structural complexity of the animals in question has rendered fission and budding impracticable and has therefore compelled a re- version to the unicellular germ and the occurrence of a detailed ontogeny in every generation,—it might seem probable that nature would not lose the advantage of connecting amphimixis with such a method of reproduction. We might therefore expect to find no exception to the occurrence of sexual reproduction in these groups. In this anticipation we should be deceived, inas- much as it only appears in the great majority of cases. In the minority, amphimixis is very far from universal, in spite of a development from unicellular germs which would so easily have permitted it: furthermore, in this minority it was formerly connected with reproduction, and has been abandoned in different degrees. These cases of development from partheno- genetic eggs are, above all others, fitted to prove the importance of the principle of utility. The transformation of female sexual cells, at first directly adapted for amphimixis, into germs no longer requiring fertilization, is an artifice by which nature has contrived to avoid amphimixis when a high degree of structural complexity has prevented reproduction by fission and budding. It may be remarked here that this suggestion supplies the answer to a difficulty which I was, for a long time, unable to 216 AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [XI solve—namely, the remarkable limitation of parthenogenesis to a few definite groups. It is only found in Crustacea, Insecta, and Rotifers, and not among Vermes, Coelenterates, and Echino- derms’: furthermore, it does not exist in the two higher groups of Molluscs and Vertebrates. The solution to the problem is found in the suggestion that the lower groups of animals dispense with parthenogenesis, because it is unnecessary to them. Whenever increase without amphimixis became advan- tageous, it was more readily and better supplied by fission and budding. The absence of parthenogenesis in the higher groups of animals may probably be explained on the supposition that no force has appeared which would render it advantageous for amphimixis to be separated from the existing method of in- crease. This is especially clear when we investigate the grounds on which it must have become advantageous among the Arthropods. The periodical occurrence of unfavourable conditions of life has often been suggested as the cause of the appearance of parthenogenesis in Arthropods and Rotifers. I need only refer to my already quoted work on Daphnidae, in which this question is considered at length. Whenevera species lives scattered over a small area subject to rapidly changing external conditions which are, for a short time, favourable to life and multiplication, and then suddenly become unfavourable or even destructive,— it must be a great advantage for the increase of individuals to take place with the greatest possible rapidity during the favourable periods. As indicated in my former work, the advantage of parthenogenesis in such cases lies in the fact that multiplication must become many times more effective when every individual is a female, or, to express the thought in more general terms, when every single germ-cell can produce a new animal. A further acceleration ensues from the omission of that retarda- tion of development which is implied by the occurrence of copulation and fertilization. From this point of view we can not only explain the appear- ance of parthenogenesis in general, but also its special form in 1 | am aware that it is believed to occur in some Coelenterates, but it seems to me doubtful whether any true parthenogenesis takes place. And, in any case, isolated exceptions do not invalidate the significance of the rule. XII.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 217 particular cases. In those Daphnids which, like the species of Moina, inhabit small rapidly filled, but also rapidly drying pools, the number of purely parthenogenetic generations which succeed one another after the foundation of the colony, is small. In Moina paradoxa and M. rectirostris males appear in the second generation, and some of the females produce resting-eggs which require fertilization. If this did not occur, if sexual reproduction, viz. multiplication associated with am- phimixis, did not take place very soon after the foundation of the colony, it would frequently happen that the latter would be destroyed by sudden drought, without the formation of resting- eggs to carry life in a latent condition over an unfavourable period, and the colony would simply perish. It may be urged that parthenogenetic eggs might have been provided with resting shells like those which are, as a matter of fact, found in other Phyllopods, for example Apus. But clearly the object is to confer upon the species the advantage of periodically repeated amphimixis, and this is therefore connected with the for- mation of resting-eggs, and reproduction is so regulated that the number of parthenogenetic generations is determined by the average duration of the favourable periods of life. Thus, among the marsh-dwelling Daphnids numerous purely parthenogenetic generations succeed each other before a sexual generation appears, while in those which inhabit lakes and are subject to uniform conditions of life interrupted only by the cold of winter, the cycle is still longer. In some species amphimixis may be en- tirely abandoned, and this seems to occur most readily in those which produce but one kind of egg, which must naturally be provided with a protective resting shell, rather than in those forming two kinds of eggs, of which only one is a resting-egg and requires fertilization. Thus it is well known that most of the colonies of the common Apus cancriformis are purely partheno- genetic, and the same is true of the greater number of fresh- water Ostracodes. Ten years ago, when I first directed my attention to the parthenogenesis of these minute Crustacea’, I was able to dis- tinguish three stages of reproduction,—-the first was found in ' Zoologischer Anzeiger, 1880, p. 72. ‘ Parthenogenese bei Ostra- coden.’ oe 218 AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [XII. such species as Cyprois monacha, of which every generation reproduces sexually ; the second was found in those species in which numerous parthenogenetic generations alternate with a sexual one; and finally the third included species in which males have not yet been found: in one such species (Cypris reptans), forty consecutive purely parthenogenetic generations have been observed. We cannot yet decide why the advantages of amphimixis have been entirely given up in this and other cases. We can- not at present solve, or even profitably discuss, every biological problem. But it is probable that we are dealing not with adaptation alone, but perhaps with a suppression of amphi- mixis by means of parthenogenesis. Everything which is desirable is not possible; and after parthenogenesis has once been incorporated in the hereditary tendencies of a species, circumstances may arise in consequence of which it may be transferred, by the power of heredity, to the remaining sexual generations also, without the possibility of any interference on the part of natural selection. Whether this explanation is in the right direction or not, it is at any rate clear, as regards the question under discussion (viz. the true significance of amphimixis), that the loss of an advantage may be intel- ligible in many ways, while the loss of a process of vital reju- venescence must stand in direct opposition to the continuance of life. It would be of the highest interest to consider more closely the various cases of parthenogenesis, from this point of view: we do not, however, possess sufficiently accurate knowledge of the vital relations of the animals in question to enable us to estimate the advantages conferred by the disappearance of amphimixis, or rather the introduction of parthenogenesis, in a larger or smaller number of generations. I may, nevertheless, be permitted to afford some indication of the line of argument. Parthenogenesis plays an important part in the group of plant- lice and bark-lice, containing very numerous species. The ova may be deposited or may undergo embryonic development within the body of the mother. In either case the advantage of parthenogenesis depends, as in the Daphnids, on the ex- traordinary rate of multiplication, which naturally reaches the highest point in the viviparous Aphidae, because the offspring XIl.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 219 actually produce embryoes within their own bodies before they are born. But here we have to do, not so much with the sudden termination of a limited and changeful developmental period, as with the greatest possible use of the opportunities afforded by an extremely rich nutriment of vegetable juices. The exces- sively rapid multiplication ensures the colony, and therefore the species, from destruction at the hands of its numerous foes, which, just on account of the abundance of food provided by the vast increase of their prey, become themselves still more numerous, so that the multiplication of these plant parasites must be carried on at the highest possible rate. Hence we find that many purely parthenogenetic generations succeed each other, while amphimixis is ensured by a single generation of males and females, appearing towards the close of the period in which the richest nutriment is supplied. On the other hand, we find that in many Cynifidae a partheno- genetic alternates with a sexual generation, and it generally happens that the latter appears in the summer, and the former in spring or even winter. The often considerable structural divergence between these two generations depends upon the very divergent conditions of life to which they are respectively exposed, and above all upon the fact that the eggs are laid in various, differently formed parts of plants, necessitating there- fore a corresponding difference in the ovipositing apparatus. But such considerations need not detain us here. The benefits conferred by the absence of amphimixis from the winter genera- tion appear to me to follow from the exceptionally unfavourable conditions of life by which it is beset. Many of these small Hymenoptera, e. g. Biorhiza aptera, emerge in the very middle of winter, on warm days in December or January, and creep upon the oak-trees, laying their eggs in the heart of the winter buds, having laboriously bored through the hard pro- tective scales with the ovipositor. Without taking food, and frequently interrupted by cold and the long nights, they carry on this work until all their eggs are safely deposited or until death from snow or cold puts an end to their labours. It is clear that such hard conditions must prove fatal to many of these insects before they have fulfilled their task, and it must conduce greatly towards the maintenance of the species, not only for all the time occupied in selection by the sexes and in fertilization 220 AMPHIMIXIS OR ESSENTIAL MEANING OF [XIl. to be saved, but also for every survivor in the struggle to be capable of laying eggs with the power of developing unaided, in other words for every such animal to be a female. Much might still be said as to the causes of the omission of amphimixis from one or more generations, but a few words. will suffice to show that the appearance of parthenogenesis depends upon adaptation to the conditions of life,—that reproduc- tion without amphimixis has invariably originated from sexual reproduction, whenever it was required in order to gain some distinct advantage in the effort to maintain the species. ‘We may well assume that the advantages which the appearance of parthenogenesis must confer, outweigh the disadvantages in- volved in the giving up of amphimixis. Our estimate as to the effects of the latter is far less certain and precise than of the former. If, however, 1 am not mistaken in my views on the significance of amphimixis as the source of individual varia- tion, it follows that its omission from a single generation or even from a series of generations may be easily compensated ; for it always reappears, and mingles afresh the complex indi- vidual predispositions into new combinations. The injury caused by its withdrawal would be less as the fertility of the species was greater; with this is connected the fact that parthenogenesis is chiefly found in very prolific species. Those individuals which sink below the level of organization charac- teristic of the species could the more easily be eliminated in the struggle for existence without in any way endangering the life of the species. Perhaps this explains why, in some few species of Crustacea (Cypris) and of Insecta (Rhodites rosae), amphimixis has utterly vanished without having caused, up to the present time, any trace of degeneration in the species. We may safely assume that the entire absence of amphi- mixis is to be primarily explained as an adaptation, and that the alternation between sexual and asexual multiplication met with in Hydromedusae, Cestoda, &c., has arisen from the demands made by the conditions of life,—demands similar to those which have determined the alternation between mono- sexual and bisexual generations found in Insecta, Crustacea, &e. In both classes of cases amphimixis has been restricted to certain generations because it was not necessary in all of them, and because such restriction was a great advantage. XIIl.] CONFUGATION AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION. 221 The means by which this limitation is exercised are different in the two classes, not by any means because parthenogenesis could not have been introduced among the lower Metazoa, but because nature did not require it, but resorted to the far more practicable and flexible methods of fission and budding. When these ceased to be available, she was compelled to alter the sexual cells in such a way that their powers of development were no longer connected with amphimixis. There are indeed no plants wholly devoid of the power of reproduction by buds. Not only the formation of stocks but also the copious increase of persons and stocks' by means of buds is everywhere at the disposal of nature, and she has made a lavish use of them. With this is probably connected the fact that parthenogenesis is unusually rare in plants and only occurs in a few groups. I must leave it to abler botanists to investigate the grounds upon which unicellular germs, originally adapted for amphimixis, have been, in certain exceptional cases, afterwards transformed into parthenogenetic germs. The alter- nation of generation, so prevalent among the lower classes of plants, takes a form somewhat different from that found in the lower groups of animals, inasmuch as, not only the multiplication which is associated with amphimixis, but also that which is without, viz. agamic, depends upon unicellular germs. Ferns, Mosses, and Lycopodiums produce vast quanti- ties of spores, the unicellular nature of which certainly does not follow from any former connexion with amphimixis in remote ancestors. It is far more probable that the unicellular condition has proved necessary in order to confer other advan- tages which, as has been suggested above, depend upon a minute size:—the lightness which facilitates transport by wind and water, and the possibility of production in enormous numbers. In conclusion, it has been shown that amphimixis is every- where present among the vital phenomena of a species when its existence is without injury to other vital interests,—that it appears, in the Protozoa, independently of reproduction, when a connexion with the latter was possible but unneces- sary,—and that, in the Metazoa, it is bound up with reproduction, inasmuch as its existence only thus became possible. It has 1 For a definition of this term see page 213. 222 AMPHIMIXTS. further been shown that its occurrence in the life of a species becomes more frequent according as its admission by the vital conditions does not entail other disadvantages. When neither the formation of stocks nor the most rapid multiplication of individuals in the shortest time is required, we find amphimixis connected with the origin of every new individual ; but when- ever the existence of the species would be endangered if new generations could not arise from the old in the most rapid succession and without any interval, we find that amphimixis is not inseparably associated with every act of reproduction, but makes its appearance only in certain generations. All this clearly points to the conclusion that amphimixis is no indispensable vital condition, no renewal of life or ‘rejuven- escence,’ but a process which has indeed a deep significance, although it is not inseparable from the continuance of vital processes. This conclusion becomes even more evident when we recognize how precisely, in the alternation of agamic and sexual reproduction, the number of agamic generations is regulated so as to correspond with the conditions of the species. The rare or frequent repetition of amphimixis in the life-history of a species is not determined by its physical nature but by the conditions of life. Its regulation depends upon adaptation ; it may be entirely excluded and the life of the species still continues. I do not know of any facts which lead us, after recognizing all this, to assume that amphimixis is anything more than an essential advantage in the maintenance and modifi- cation of species. INDEX Abt Vogler, 47. Acquired characters, transmission of, 14, 15, 40, 96. Aecidiomycetes, reproduction in, 169. Aglia tau, development of, 175. Amphigonic reproduction, 106, 167. Amphimixis, 99, 176, 193, 218; definition of, 180, 199; appear- ance of, 210. Ants, 20, 28; slaves of, 25. Aphidae, polar bodies in, 112; par- thenogenesis in, 167, 218. Apteryx, 3. Apus, parthenogenesis of, 10g, 167, 198, 217. Aristotle, on heredity, 106. Artemia, parthenogenesis of, 109, 153, 155. Ascaris megalocephala, fertiliza- Pons.of, 86, or, 192, 146, 172; lumbricoides, 146; formation of spermatozoa, 147; development of spermatozoa in, 117; of ovum, 126. Ascomycetes, parthenogenetic, 169. Auerbach, on nuclear division, Iil2. Baccillariaceae, fusion amongst, 195. Bach, 45. Balbiani, on parthenogenesis, 108 ; on Infusoria, 177, 183. Balfour, on polar bodies, 106, 111. Basidiomycetes, parthenogenesis in, 169. Bees, larvae of, 28; partheno- genesis of, 109, 171, 198, 211. Beethoven, 46. Bellini, 47. Bergh, on nuclear division in In- fusoria, 183. Berthold, on parthenogenesis, or. Biorhiza, parthenogenesis in, 219, Blochmann, on polar bodies, rrr, Eyi: Bohm, on fertilization, 204. Bombyces, 27, 174. Boveri, on fertilization in Echinus, 92, 114, 146; on nuclear loops, EL 7, Le, 13% 172, Brahms, 47. Branchiopods, polar bodies in, 152. Brindis y Salas, negro musician, 44. Bunge, on vital processes, 110, 196. Bitschli, on nuclear division, 112, I77, 181, 196; on polar bodies, II4. Caecilia, absence of sense organs in, 9, 28; Callwitz, 45. Carcinus, IT. Carinaria, number of idants in, 134. Carnoy, on maturation of ovum, 126, Cat, influenced by music, 55; number of cells in cochlea, 57. Caves, in Carniola and Carinthia, 7; mammoth of Kentucky, 7; near Trieste, 17. 224 Chamisso, 38. Cherubini, 47. Cimarosa, 45. Clementi, 52. Cocconeis, fusion of, 195. Cochlea, number of cells in human, Colpidium, reproduction in, 179. Combination nucleus, 179. Conjugation, significance of, 189. Cook, Captain, 38. Corti, organ of, 56. Cramer, 47. Crustacea, blind, 7; parasitic, ro. Cyclopidae, fertilization in, 174. Cynipidae, parthenogenesis in, 167, 219. Cypris, variation in, 161, 167; or- ganic reproduction, 198, 211, 218, Cyprois, reproduction of, 218. Czerny, 47. Daphnids, polar bodies in, 111, 152; parthenogenesis of, 167, 216. Darwin, on natural selection, 15, 33; on sexual selection, 34; on pangenesis, 79, 81. Death, of the Protozoa, 201, 203, 207. De Bary, on parthenogenesis, 108. Degeneration, general, 6, 18, 20, 22, 27; of sense of smell, 9; of ear, 9; of parasites, zo, 1: of parts of flower, 18; of instinct to flee, 24. Development, retrogressive, I, 3, r7- De Vries, on pangenesis, 81, 96, 128. Disuse, 6, 7, 12, 15, 26. Dog, influenced by music, 55. Dolphin, degeneration of sense of smell, 9; naked skin, 19. Domestic animals, loss of original colour of, 19; instinct to escape, 23. Echinus, fertilization in, 92, 146. Ectocarpus, parthenogenesis in, gl. Engelmann, 177, 196. INDEX. Entoniscidae, 11, 12, 23. Ephemeridae, 27, 28. Epicrium, auditory organ of, g. Eternity, 74, 78. Euglypha, division of, 184. Farlow, on parthenogenesis, 108. Flemming, on nuclear division, E12, t3o7 Lda Fol, on penetration of lght in water, 8; on fertilization, 105, £72, 176. Forel, on penetration of light in water, 8; on ants, 26. Formica fusca, 26. Fux, Joseph, 45. Geddes, on nature of nucleus, 85. Germ cells, 77, 81. Germ nucleus, 159. Germ plasm, continuity of, 82, 83, 95. Giard, on polar bodies, 114. Gonoplastid theory, 170. Greeks, music of, 39.. Gruber, on fission in Infusoria, 86, 177, 16L, 198. Guinea-pig, 24. Gurney, on ‘The Power of Sound,’ 66. Hanslick, on ‘The Beautiful in Music,’ 66. Harvey, on conception, 106. Hasse, 47, 50. Hawaians, music of, 38. Haydn, 45, 52. Helmholtz, on the auditory organ, 56. Henking, on formation of germ- cells, 139, 141. Hensen, on fertilization, 106, 108, 196. Herbart, 80. Heredity, 8r. Hermit crab, 19. Hertwig, O., 83, 92, 105, III, I12, II4, 119, 126, 132, 147, 176, 189. Hertwig, R., 92, 105, 176, 181, 184, 196, 207. Huber, on ants, 26. Hummel, 47, 52. INDEX, Hydroids, migration of germ-cells in, 84; reproduction in, 214. Idants, definition of, 130; number of, 146. Idioplasm, 82, 83, 85, 92, I12, 114. Ids, definition of, 130. Immortality, 74, 78, 87, 209. Infusoria, artificial fission in, 86, IQI ; conjugation of, 87, 90, 177, IQI. Insecta, polar bodies in, 152. Instincts, 24, 25, 26. Ischikawa, on polar bodies, 111. Isopods, parasitic, 11, 12. Jewish musicians, 49. Kiwi-kiwi, 3, 4, 5, 28. Klein, on Volvox, 77. Kodlliker, criticisms of, 92, 94. Kupffer, on fertilization, 204. Lepidoptera, parthenogenesis in, BUY,:175- Leuckart, 108, 214. Light, penetration of, in water, 8. Limnadia, parthenogenesis of, 100, 167. Liparis, parthenogenesis of, 109, ay Liszt, 52. Lotti, 47. Lotze, 80. Léwenhoek, on fertilization, 106. Lubbock, on ants, 26. on parthenogenesis, Malpighi, on fertilization, 106. Martin Luther, 45. Maupas, on conjugation, 87, 93, 177, 183, 189, 196. Micronuclei, function of, meaning of division of, 185. Minot, on polar bodies, 111. Moa, 5. Moina, 88, 89, 206, 217. Moles, loss of sight in, 8 Mollusca, number of idants in, 146. Moscheles, 52. Mozart, 47, 52, 62. r8r ; 225 Music, origin of, 53, 97. Musical sense, 33, 55. Mutilations, not inherited, 41. Nageli, on idioplasma, 112, 194. Natural selection, 15, 21, 23, 33, 35- Naumann, 45. Negroes, talent for music of, 44. Nematodes, number of idants, 146, Newts, 16. New Zealanders, music of, 38. Nucleus, significance of, 194. Nussbaum, on division in Infu- soria, 86, 191. Oncidium, eyes of, 183. Onychodromus, conjugation in, 185, 187. Ostracoda, parthenogenesis in, I10, 161, 167, 217; polar bodies in TLE, Po. Ostrich, 5, 6. Ovum, maturation of, 114, 122, 123, 126, 132; in parthenoge- netic, 150. Oxytrichidae, 187. Palestrina, 45. Pandorina, 77, 200. Pangenesis, 79, 81, 128. Panmixia, 21, 22, 27, 76, 209. Paramaecium, reproduction of, 177, 185. Parasites, 10. Parthenogenesis, 91, 108, Irr, 150, 156, 167, 218; in Fungi, 94, 169; in Ostracoda, 110; in- heritance in, 159, 166; in Cypris, 161; in plants, 169; origin of, 170, 175; limitation of, 216. Pauer, 52. Penguin, 6, Io. Petromyzon, fertilization of, 204. Pfitzner, on nuclear division in Infusoria, 183. Pfluger, on parthenogenesis, 108. Phryganidae, 19. Phyllirhoe, number of idants in, 134. Phyllopods, 167, 217. Phylloxera, 167, 211. 226 Platner, on formation of germ- cells; 156. rya: Polar bodies, 86, 93, 114, 115, 119, 170; parthenogenetic, 93, III. Polyergus rufescens, 25. Polyphemus, polar bodies of, 111. Problems, of the Day, 71. Proteus, blind, 7, 28. Psyche, parthenogenesis of, Io9. Psychidae, 19. Pteris, parthenogenesis in, 169. Pyrrhocoris, on formation germ-cells in, 139, 141. of Quanz, 45. Rabbit, number of cells in cochlea, 57: Reineke, 47. Rejuvenescence, theory of, 195. Reizius, on the cochlea, 57. Rhodiets, parthenogenesis 220. Rolph, explanation of partheno- genesis, 172. Rossini, 47. Rotifers, 27; polar bodies in, 111, 152; parthenogenesis in, 216. Rousseau, on the origin of music, 53: Rudimentary organs, 28. in, Sagitta, number of Idants, 146. Sarasin, on penetration of light in water, 8: on Epicrium, 9. Scarlatti, 47. Scheibe, on the origin of music, 53. Schewiakoff, on division in In- fusoria, 184. Schopenhauer, 209. Scytosiphon, parthenogenesis in, ol. Semper, on eyes of Oncidium, 183. Sexual selection, 34, 39. Siebold, von, on parthenogenesis, 108. Solenobia, 109. Soma, 74, 79. parthenogenesis of, INDEX. ne cells, 77, 81; idioplasm, 2: Somatoplasm, 83. Spencer, Herbert, on the origin of music, 53. Spermatozoon, maturation of, 117, E22. to aoe, Sphaerechinus, fertilization in, 92. Stentor, 181, 192. Strasburger, 83, 86, 92, 95, I12, 150, 168, 172, 189. Stumpf, on the origin of music, 53. Sully, on ‘Sensation and Intui- tion,’ 66. Swammerdam, on fertilization, 106. Tahitians, music of, 38. Thalberg, 52. Theories, real and ideal, 80. Tiara, number of idants in, 146. Troubadours, 42, 69. Twins, 133. Urostyla, division of, 184, 186. Van Beneden, on fertilization, 85, OI, III, 114, 196; on nuclear division, I12, 126, 131, 172, 176. Variation, origin of, 95; in par- thenogenetic form, 161, 166. Vines, criticisms on Vol. i, 73, 78, 92, 94. Volkmann, 47. Volvox, 77. Vorticellidae, behaviour of micro- nucleus in, 187. Waldeyer, on nuclear loops, 85. Wallace, on natural selection, 15, Wasps, parthenogenesis of, 109. Weber, 46. Whales, degeneration of sense of smell, 9; naked skin, ro. Whitman, on nature of nucleus, 85. Xenarchus, 34. Orford PRINTED AT THE CLARENDON PRESS BY HORACE HART, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY ae ei a A ee ee ee wks as. Pah ian s aA a a Ne Ae ede a ee ee, oO ARES SA heey Siete ee eS eS aps EN IE nt Ne Ee a ne Pare AER es a ee ee ee dae Sanne eet ea ee Oe rte pina aninsiySpslnsincnstnnyn timation le a en NA ht EE NER NGM NO I AD AA em ND Nt NRC penne piteinnn nana nanan tiatant henley Tiana atte iene x te ort wnne SS i Sew ee vi Se OS Oye ee meme tee 2% #54 }4 AW? - “1 Ps < eae ee ee SSS ee Se SS ewan 2 phe ala chal - LAD) a ALAA Se Stele Oe ad ak NON i : a ts TAS. ; ‘ La AS As nae Ve a aN oe ees oats : Si Nc ee et : Sere EO area : SSC NY < : : Lee athe cso an shoe “a Ea 2 , inch BURAK AAKT Ret eS BEER Ahhh Ab MELA CARH EERO ETS ls > es —_- er : nee “ nine inat Sire daslindlan Tonto sh ol oof of. stnad-oZna! Ball sPakaos, seevestneter Mt “HEN Dale SMA wu apa sabe ase eisteets a pan ete Me ae SMe BEY NUMMER ; LF AEST BEERS BRUM RY ME DH MS UBTD sricbomesis ee en Fie kan eee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ——————— ee ee Oe Or ee pena eA AM ¥