Bygenm S i a a * ” ge oe ee | [AG COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY, VY. { AT HARVARD COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, MASS. Founded by private subscription, in 1861. RNADEARARAA ANN No. IGS4, FIGURES AND DESCRIPTIONS OF CANADIAN ORGANIC REMAINS. | A Wa aaa I.—FOSSILS from the base of the Trenton Group. By J. W. Sanam, bk Palzontologist of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom. if: Sk = IL—GRAPTOLITIDE# from ihe Lower Silurian. By Professor Tasces ts Hatt, Paleontologist of the State of New York. “ TIL—CYSTIDE and ASTERIDEA. By E. Bituines. Genus CYCLO- Pe CYSTOIDES. By H. Brtines and J. W. Sautmr. Paleozoic ae Bivalve ENTOMOSTRACA. By T. R. Jones, Esq.,F.G.8. “ TV.—CRINOIDE from the Lower Silurian. By E. Biturnes. Decades I. and III. are published. Decade IV. will be published on the Ist of J une, ; and Penne II. in about six months. FOR SALE BY ie B. DAWSON & SON, 22 Great St. James Street, Montreal; A. H. ARMOUR & oe yt Toronto; JOHN WILEY, New York; HECTOR BOSSANGE & SON, Paris, Franters SAMPSON, LOW, SON & Co. Psuden, England. Montreal, Ist May, 1859. ; : O = fC | ete ls [a «lisse lore llerellle spinulosus, Bl So ances has Sune locas. (acl |e2solealaolleeltolsalsallsa.c Whitfieldi, Blococbo sooo scaboteall a6 |lsclle|ooloalloalac|bella ollacloulls (unnamed,) n. s. Sodb dab 5060 oUn6Ool|Dol| Gn lool|e8iad}icolloalloaliadios|iouiiaails Genus Crimacocraprtus, Hall. C. antennarius, Bl oagowoncdabooncallsoll $3" lloalloclloolballoallboleo|sollaoficallc bicornis, lsboo 6060 dogs saablloolli oo lloolS3lloalsclealloaliMolloallo cia ole parvus, n. s., lelSSooandouodd OD aolool) So jool(eelloollociasié allele slocllosiioc typicalis, n. s., lel condo soon deddollooll’ao |loalS|loollas|eollslloalidolloailooh © (Sub-genus Dicranograptus, Hall.) _ C. divaricatus, 31a Hd Bac COOO CUED) Oc)| ec eal Gol oa) (aclolacle leis laelc furcatus, BI Gn cceS PeMmnOercalacr Sse onions icici aaalleallc ramosus, Bisse hastooneccraclog) Gs lseles)suSellecltulosiicn|aallsaic sextans, Tie leisjeiaie etn s slates [of aia) fale fates silmial anil atell tell aretatorera siaverrierel| sta] ae Murrayi, EL taie Cratelntes thoi a ioretall teil Ae Neenah, Ub Gopae ogacco 2aa6lboll oo quadrangularis, EDs areter foto aterctonetcroter hel ese retiformis, lls cone do goNoaee|lool|-oc Websteri,t EL yeraintatciere tereretarctete leh ets Genus Pritrocrartus, Hall. P. Geinitzianus, TD. cierto ce ses) aeiaraia wiaredl mee ge plumosus, latroanaduoodocecpalool! & Genus THamnocraptvs, Hall. T. Anna, 13ieaeriocoodocomaas| oll <3 capillaris, Elistars siactesiticlers typus, TH hin saistcinga Siler Genus Rastrites, Barrande. R. Barrandi, BD in exaidaateistsietaiaietadl a's Nice Genus Burnoerartus, Hall. B. laxus, Te. dew swteetretararetattne f ior Genus Inocautis, Hall. I. plumulosa, Ts oe ate maajeiayosarsisieiiaell Mave Genus OxpHamia [?], Forbes. QO. MEULICOSS, Unis, beta tells tesa as wes p Tt Nova Scotia. EP bo Slo a 2i6 . os lie mn a o|% 3 > Ts io} a Iolo . | fam acl | O | ge | 00/2 . sil esilies Seq olehs & S sf S/£1s ~ =| fo} o|B io] a] ee 5 5 eS Slslslelols slg c |. ao] & o (Q Siroja|s|MolEla 8) ole | S| OD lo es |S) O a2 c\o)/a HIS (0 lZ lO Pp GO| eefeolorlealactes|erlee| Hleeles eolecleetecls | He leelecles eolecleclee| Hleefeslecleeiselee oe . eel Klecles alee . eejyecles efectos eelee eeleelos % i. . ealeslee ee ejee ee ef oe . ae a esleclee se . .| 4 oe eeleew eles soles eoleclee peleelecleeler elecleslecies ele electee eleeleel|selee ol Klee alee eleslecleciee eel Hele elewlee wolecleslee oo| % . eolesleclecien Wiese oe eeleeleuwlealee eelee eleel eofaeleeleasee He leeleelewleefevleclaclerleelec GRAPTOLITES. 59 § VIII.—HISTORICAL NOTICE* OF THE GENUS GRAPTOLITHUS. Folia GRAMINEUM. .-..Bromel. { Linnzeus, Wahlenberg, Beck, Quenstedt, Mur- GRAPTOLITHUS.++«-- chison, Portlock, De Verneuil, Keyserling, Mather, Vanuxem, Emmons, Barrande, D’Or- GRAPTOLITES ..2+--- bigny, Geinitz, Suess, Meneghini, McCoy, Richter, Salter, Nicol, Harkness, Hall. PRIODON «ee+.ee «.«e- Nilsson. ORTHOCERATITES....... Wahlenberg, Schlotheim, Quenstedt, Geinitz. LOMATOCERAS -....+- Bronn, Hichwald. PRIONOTUS. «24 eeeess- Nilsson, Hisinger. FUCOIDES--.....05 ...Brongniart, Eaton, Emmons, Conrad. PETALOLITHUS.-.+.+-- Suess. Diprion (sub-genus) .. Barrande. DipymoGRAPTUS ...---McCoy, Salter, and others. DIPLOGRAPTUS.... +++. McCoy, Salter, Harkness, etc. Monoprion (s.-gen.) .. Barrande. MoNOGRAPTUS «...+-- ey Geinitz, Emmons. CLADOGRAPTUS ..-.- GLOSSOGRAPTUS..... NEMAGRAPTUS,..2+0- | Hmmons. TETRAGRAPTUS.-.... DICHOGRAPTUS .-.... | satter. A. D. 1727. The graptolites of Sweden were observed by Bromel, who regarded them as leaves of grasses. (Act. Upsal.) 1736. Linneus established the genus Grraptolithus in the first edition of his Systema Nature; and some years later, in the twelfth edition, introduced specific names, (@. scalaris being the type of the genus. This form has been regarded by Wahlenberg, Geinitz, and Barrande as the G. sagittarius, compressed in a direction rectangular to the cellules. The G. sagittarius, Linn., is therefore regarded by the latter author as the veritable historical prototype of the genus Graptolithus and of the family of graptolites. For my own part, I consider the G. scalaris, so far as illustrations of that form have come under my observation, as a distinct type of the graptolite family. 1821. Wahlenberg considered the graptolites of Sweden as very slender orthoceratites. (Nova Acta. Soc. Scien. Upsal, vol. viii, pp. 92 and 93.) 1822. Schlotheim, participating in the opinion of Wahlenberg, described and figured a species under the name Orthoceratites serratus. (Petrefak- enkunde, p. 56, pl. viil, fig. 3.) * From the earliest notice of the genus Graptolithus to the year 1850, I have added but little to that which has already been published by M. Barrande in his Graptolites of Bohemia. 60 - CANADIAN FOSSILS. 1828. Ad. Brongniart described two species of graptolites from the Transition formation at ‘* Pomte Lévi prés Québec dans le Canada,” as Fucoides dentatus and /. serra.* (Histoire des Végétaux Fossiles, pp. 10 and 71, pl. vi, fig. 7-12.) 1829 [18317]. F. Holl republished the description of Orthoceratites. serratus of Schlothem. (Handbuch die Petrefacten., vol. 1, p. 234.) 18—? Prof. Nilsson recognized the graptolites as polyps belonging to the ceratophydians. He proposed to substitute the pre-occupied name of Priodon for that of Graptolithus. (See Dr. Beck, in Murchison’s Silurian System, p. 696.) 1835. Prof. Bronn, adopting the opinion of Prof. Nilsson regarding the nature of graptolites, gave the name Lomatoceras (Lethea Geognos- tica, vol. i, p. 50, pl. 1, fig. 13, L. priodon), at the same time arranging the species with the orthoceratites, etc. 1857. Hismger described five species of graptolites from the rocks of Sweden, adopting the generic name Prionotus, created by Prof. Nilsson. Among these are two species of Linnzus, P. sagittarius and P. scalaris ; to which he added the new species P. pristis, P. foliwm, and P. convolutus. (Leth. Suecia, p. 118, pl. 85.) In the second supple- ment to that work, published in 1840, two other species are added, under the names P. geminus and P. teretiusculus; the latter being of the type of G. scalaris. (Supp. ui, p. 5, pl. 88.) 1839. Sir Roderick Murchison described and figured in the: Silurian System three species of graptolites, G. Ludensis, G. Murchisoni, and G. foliaceus. (Sil. System, p. 695.) 1840. Prof. Hichwald published a description of Zomatoceras distichus, a graptolite from the Silurian formation of Esthonia. (Stl. Syst. im Esthiand, p. 101.) 1840. Prof. Quenstedt sought to re-establish the opinion that the grap- tolites are true orthoceratites. (WV. Jahrb. f. Min., p. 275.) 1842. Prof. Geinitz described and figured five species of graptolites under the names G. foliaceus, Murchison, G. priodon, Bronn, G. La- densis, Murchison, G. serratus, Schloth., G. scalaris, Linn., and G. spiralis, Geinitz; regarding them as belonging to the Cephalopoda. (NV. Jahrb. f. Min., p. 697.) 1842. Vanuxem identified a graptolite of the Utica slate with the Fucoides dentatus of Brongniart. Graptolithus dentatus, Vanuxem, G. pristis, Hall, His.? (Geol. Rep. 38d Dist. N. Y., p. 57, fig. 2.) 1843. Gen. Portlock, in his Geological Report, discussed the nature * These species are probably identical with those which I have heretofore described as G. pristiniformis and G. bryonoides. GRAPTOLITES. 61 of the graptolites, recognizing them as true zoophytes, and indicating their analogy with Sertularia and Plumularia. He suggested that the species may form several genera, belonging perhaps to different orders. The species described and enumerated by this author are indicated under the names G. Sedgwicki, G. distans, G. tenuis, Portlock; G. convolutus, G. sagittarius, G. pristis, and G. folium, Hisiagee: G. scalaris, Linn., G.foliaceus, Lons. (Geol. Rep. on Londonderry, Tyrone, and Fermanagh, pp. 317-321, pls. xix and xx.) The species described by this author as Gorgonia, probably belong to Dictyonema. 1843. W. W. Mather and EH. Emmons recognized Graptolithus dentatus as characterizing the Utica slate. (Geol. Rep. 1st Dist. N. Y., p. 390, and Geol. 2nd Dist. N. Y., p. 279.) 1843. J. Hall described Graptolithus Clintonensis, from the shales of the Clinton group in the Upper Silurian. (Geol. Rep. 4th Dist. NV. Y., p- (2, fig. 12.) 1845. Sir R. I. Murchison, De Verneuil, and Count Keyserling enu- merated G. sagittarius, Hisinger, and G. distichus, Hichwald, as charac- terizing the Silurian formations of Russia. (Geol. of Russia and the Ural Mts., vol. ii, p. 882.) 1846. Prof. Geinitz repeats the opinion expressed by himself in 1842, regarding the nature of the graptolites; and divides them into two sec- tions, the straight and the spiral forms. In the first section he de- scribes four species: 1. G. foliaceus, Murchison, (with which he identifies G. pristis and G. folium, Hisinger, and G. dentatus, Vanuxem); 2. G. priodon, Bronn, (under which he includes G. Ludensis, Murchison, and G. teretiusculus, Hismger); 3. G. sagittarius and G. scalaris, Linn. (which he regards as varieties of the same species), Hwcordes serra, Brong., and G. Murchisoni, Beck; 4. G. serratus, Schlot. (Grundriss der Ver- stein, p. 310, pl. x.) 1846. EH. Emmons published Fucoides simplex [= Graptolithus' seca- linus|, from the roofing-slates of Hoosic. (Natural History of New- York, Agriculture, vol. i, pl. xvii, fig. 1.) 1847. J. Hall described and figured fifteen species of graptolites, mostly new, from the Lower Silurian strata, placing them among zoophytes. (Pal. NV. York, vol. i, p. 265, pls. lxxii, lxxiii, and Ixxiv.) 1848. Rev. Prof. Sedgwick announced the occurrence of Graptolithus sagittarius, His., and G. latus, McCoy, in the Skiddaw slates. (Quarterly Jour. Geol. oe vol. iv, p. 293, ) 1848. J. W. aie described G. folium, G. pristis, Hisinger, G. pristis, var. foliaceus, Portlock, G. ramosus, Hall, G. Tenia, Sowerby and Salter, G. tenuis, Portlock, and G. sextans, Hall, from the slates of Loch Ryan, etc. (Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc., vol. v, pp. 15-1T.) 1848. Prof. Philips enumerated the G. Ludensis, G. Murchisoni, and 62 CANADIAN FOSSILS. three other species in the Builth, Llandeilo, and Haverford-west districts. (Memoirs of the Geol. Survey, vol. ii, part 1, p. 308.) 1849. James Nicol enumerated ant Toshiba Graptolithus Griestonensis, G. convolutus, G. Ludensis, and G. lacus. (Quarterly Jour. Geol. Soc., vol. vi, pp. 63 and 64.) 1849. J. Hall stated the occurrence of twenty species of graptolites in the Lower Silurian rocks; two other species having been found in the Clinton formation.* (Proceedings of the Amer. Assoc. for the Advance- ment of Science, 1849, p. 351.) 1850. J. Barrande published a memoir upon the graptolites of Bohemia, describing seventeen species of Graptolithus, of which fifteen were new 3 anew genus, Rastrites, with four species; and the genus etiolites, with one species. These are all placed among the Polypi. All of these species, except one, are found in the Upper Silurian; four of them occur in the colonies of the inferior division, and pass upward to the superior beds; while one species is restricted to the lower division. M. Barrande has given in this memvir a resumé of the geographical and geological distri- bution of the graptolites in the different countries of the globe. 1850. Prof. McCoy described three species of graptolites, proposing the name Diplograpsus for those with a double series of cellules. He proposed also the generic name Protovirgularia for a zoophyte which he refers to the Gorgoniadx, but which may perhaps belong to the Grap- tolitide. (Annals and Magazine of Nat. Hist., vol. vi, 2nd series, pp. 270-272.) 1850. Prof. Harkness described the graptolites found in the black shales of Dumfries-shire, recognizing two species of Rastrites and ten species of Graptolites. (Quar. Jour. Geol. Soc., vol. vii, pp. 59-65, pl. i.) 1851. Prof. McCoy published descriptions and figures of graptolites from British paleeozoic rocks, adopting the name Diplograpsus for the Species with two ranges of cellules. Of fifteen species which he described, eleven are identified as those of preceding authors, and three of these are recognized as American species. (British Paleozoic Fossils, pp. 3-9, pl. 1 B.) 1851. Dr. H. A. Prout described a graptolite, G. Hallianus [= Den- drograptus|, from the Potsdam sandstone of the St. Croix River. (Am. Journal Science [2], vol. ix, p. 187.) 1851. Edward Suess published descriptions of Bohemian graptolites, reproducing nearly all of those described by Barrande, recognizing several other known species, and describing nine new species. He proposed the name Petalolithus as a substitute for Diprion, = Diplograptus. (Watur- * This number of twenty species included some forms known, but not at that time described. GRAPTOLITES. 63 wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, vierter Band, pp. 88-134, pls. vi, vill, and ix.) 1851. J. W. Salter described G. tenuis, Portlock, and G. bullatus, = G. pristis?, from the Silurian rocks of Scotland. (Murchison, Silurian Rocks of Scotland, Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc., vol. vil, pp. 173 and 174.) 1851. Boeck; Bemarkinger Angaaende Graptolithen Christiania (cited by Geinitz; the work not seen by the writer). 1851. Scharenberg, iéiber Graptolithen (cited by Geinitz; work not seen by the writer). 1852. Prof. Geinitz described the graptolites of Saxony, placing them among zoophytes, and proposing the genera Monograpsus and Cladograpsus for certain forms of graptolites, and the genus Mereograpsus to include Myrianites, Nerettes, ete. He enumerates and describes fifty species of graptolites of his own, or of preceding authors; and one species of Retiolites, R. Geinitzianus. (Die Versteinerungen der Grauwacken-forma- tion, heft 1, Die Graptolithen.) 1852. J.W. Salter described some graptolites from the south of Scotland, recognizing three species. (Quar. Jour. Geol. Soc., vol. vill, pp. 388- 391, pl. xxi.) 1852. J. Hall reproduced the Graptolithus Clintonensis, and described G. venosus, = Retiolites venosus. He also described the genus Dictyo- nema, suggesting its relations with Graptolithus, and likewise the genus Inocaulis. (Paleontology of New-York, vol. ii, pp. 89 and 40, pl. xvii, and pp. 174-176, plates xl F, and xl @.) 1853. J. W. Salter. A new species of graptolite (Didymograptus caduceus, Salter), “from the Lauzon Precipice, Hudson River Group.” (Quarterly Jour. Geol. Soc., vol. ix, p. 87.) 1855. Dr. Emmons described several new species of Graptolites, and proposed the generic names of Wemagrapsus, Glossograpsus, and Stauro- grapsus. (American Geology, vol. i.) 1857. Prof. Meneghini, from collections made by General De la Mar- mora, described ten species of graptolites from the Silurian rocks of the Island of Sardinia, of which eight species were new. (Palcontologie de PLle de Sardaigne.) 1857. J. Hall communicated to Sir William EH. Logan descriptions of twenty-one new species of graptolites from the Lower Silurian rocks of Point Lévis (Lauzon seigniory) near Quebec, (many of the species having compound forms not before known among this family of fossils,) and proposed several new genera. (Report of Progress, Geol. Survey of Canada, 1857. See also the Canadian Naturalist and Geologist, vol. iii.) 1859. J. Hall published Motes upon the genus Graptolithus, with. an enumeration of the Canadian species ; a notice of graptolite-stipes with reproductive cells, together with descriptions of two new species. (Zwelfth Report on the State Cabinet, Albany, pp. 45 and 58, 1859.) 64 CANADIAN FOSSILS. 1859. The preceding notes were reproduced, with descriptions of five additional species of Graptolithus, one Retiograptus, the genus Thamno- graptus with two species, and one species of Rastrites. (Paleontology NV. Y., vol. iti, pp. 495 and 522.) 1860. J. Hall, in continuation of the paper from the Twelfth Report on the State Cabinet (from Paleontology of New-York, vol. iii, Supp.), described additional species of Graptolithus, Retiograptus, Thamnograp- tus, and Rastrites as above. (Thirteenth Report of the State Cabinet, pp. 50-64, 1860.) 1861. J. W. Salter in “ New Fossils from the Skiddaw Slates,” noticed the occurrence of several species of Graptolithus, and the discovery of a branching form similar to those which Sir William H. Logan first brought to light i Canada, which he proposed to term Dichograptus. (Geologist, vol. i, p. 74.) 1861. Prof. McCoy sent to the writer a proof of a plate of graptolites from the ‘‘ Paleontology of Victoria.’ Among the figures are species closely resembling or identical with G. ramosus, G. furcatus, and G. gracilis ; while others resemble G. pristis, G. sagittarius, &c. The descriptions or farther illustrations have not come under our notice. 1861. HE. Billings “ On the occurrence of Graptolites in the base of the Lower Silurian.’ The paper contained a review of the work of Freid- rich Schmidt, and a comparison of the graptolitic zones in Europe and America, with a view to show that the graptolite-schists of Norman’s Kill near Albany are not in the upper part of the Lower Silurian division. (Canadian Naturalist and Geologist, vol. vi, pp. 844 and 548.) 1863. Sir William H. Logan recognized the occurrence of Graptolithus bicornis, G. ramosus, G. mucronatus, and G. pristis, characteristic spe- cies of the shales of Norman’s Kill, in the Utica and Hudson River forma- tions of Canada. (Geology of Canada, p. 200, and Catalogue of Fossils, p- 942. Idem, Graptolites of the Quebec group, pp. 226 and 228.) 1863. J. W. Salter (Note on Skiddaw-Slate Fossils) noticed some new species of graptolites, proposing the new genus Zetragraptus, and describing the genus Dichograptus previcusly proposed and cited above. (Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, vol. xix, pp. 185-140, with illustrations. ) .*, The Graptolithus from the Hoosic slate-quarries was named by Prof. Eaton Fucotdes secalinus, and the specimens were thus labelled in the cabinet of the Rensselaer School at Albany, as known to the writer from 1832 to 1836; but we have been unable to find any published description. (Oil is ol cece Nol Olds a iil Ud Uh J.—SYNOPSIS OF THE SPECIES OF GRAPTOLITIDA OF THE QUEBEC GROUP, DESCRIBED IN THIS MEMOIR. A. SPECIES HAVING A BILATERAL ARRANGEMENT OF PARTS. Barrande; Monograptus, Geinitz.) (Sub-genus Monoprion, Genus GraPTOLiTHus, Linneeus. a. Species consisting of two stipes from a single axis. tus, McCoy ; Cladograptus, Geinitz in part.) Plate. (Gio MGS) GGadoodolbonpedooO DOD CoonddoDS ATUL USM are, Cot stat wtatad Shes er dieotatetel alcehetctadet DUT HUSM Herat eatctctetaatetatatcern sce intemetetts ealee HOUTA Prarie evarclcierciciacvelcctetatetetstats et tctahas ATU GL@NGUIS) 2 mial ofieiascicicletatutete tala tatcteictecatetatete ele EXAMS etaters/sersicrcieareleleistetctes ciercisie ree GORTUWAGIES a5 doedtoocodcdoncodosadood SIMA U Sweretevatareraretarctelcietsls ctor sieeve er elerete ALCU MUS Maletal wine! arelereleietaraiersre/ _________ * This feature may possibly be sometimes due to the overlapping of two adjacent folia, so as to bring the cell-partitions and cell-denticles near to and parallel with each other, showing a denticle from each one. GRAPTOLITES. 135) 3. A form similar to the preceding, showing remains of cellules on the upper part of the axis. 4, An elliptical form of stipe, where two of the divisions have been separated, leaving the bases of two sets of cellules. 5. seacdsse 64 Buchwald ssjeye eleie wo «ele, -\nial=inlejoid= <= 40, 60 ID AMADIS sooo SG OcbdbOaDE Sb oo noZkl ail, he FENESTELLA, -.+. 4-0. 586500909505 39, 136 INMACIE Se nanesscococdae oo sogéoa 6: 19 Fucoipes dentatus,.........+-+ .--84, 110 F. S€CALiINUS,.... 2 s,c0e- ee eesees 64 F. Sand, s-Beode cooepoosaoeadc 84 Geinitz, 5, 28, 40, 41, 46, 47, 60, 61, 63, 78, 81 Germs of Graptolites, ........2.4-- 33, 34 GHOSSOGRAP TUS) = 0s. jlalseciie ele =iaei=y= 41, 43 GORGONTAD 2 eet eer rustic 136 GRaPTOLITHUS, 7, 28, 40, 42, 48, 68, 115, 117, 136 G. abnormis,........ Sen 320855 106 G. HEMI galce cond soo oS On aT 20, 93 G. SANCUSO MUS ne ie eta 110 G. antennarius (Climacograp- UNS) Rom yownmeoa soos oSd 32, 112 G. armatus,....79, 92, 101, 129, 139 G. bicornis (Climacograptus),.. 20, 21, 21, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 45, 112, 146 G: pinduss. 2 ssqg= 29, 41, 73, 83, 93 G. Bigslylneeieeeaes 48, 86, 129, 139 G. bryonoides, 8, 41, 42, 48, 70, 78, 83, 84, 85, 89, 95, 96, 128, 134 G CAdUCeUS Hp ieiie a eter 41, 42, 87 G. Clintonensis, ..-.....- 25,27, 28 iG. constrictus,.....-- ~» (6, 85, 134 150 INDEX. PAGE. PAGE. GRAPTOLITHUS ColonuS,.......+++.+-. 21 Graproritip#, Geological and geogra- CLUCITET or ele oar lels sleet: 92, 93 phical distribution G. denticulatus, ........ 88, 93, 129 OG srena co Sdoao.5¢ 51 G. divaricatus,........-...-- 14, 46 a: Historical notice of the G. divergens,.....«- -- 12, 13, 23, 24 genus Graptolithus,59-64 G GUD, : 5's wale ww sere ace a Mode of existence of,.. 38 G extensus,....27, 29, 76, 80, 83, 85 ns Nature and form of,.. 5 G. extenuatus,...+...+++.--> 75, 132 a Nature and ornaments G MaCCIMNE enchaeertneietee ire 143 of the test of, 21, 30, 32 G. flexilis, 11, 42, 103, 106, 107, 108, a Reproduction ia the,.. 32 109 ue Synopsis of the genera G. foliaceus, ........ ese s cence 44 OAecgenocds od soc: 50 G. LOM Pearcleitateletaleteteeyelsielets ite 2c ce Synopsis of the species a. Forchhammeri,........-..- 41, 46 of, in the di G fruticosus, ...... Anon eawdd 205 SE PROM ates once 65 G. furcatus,.. ie 1G, 40, 41, 46 a Table showing the ver- G. creme eavclsiee sasha eclw'= ss Al tical distribution of G. QEMINUS, «eee eeeeeeeeee 41, 46 the genera of,..... - 55 G. PTAC. eote es ces 13, 14, 23, 43 us Table showing the geo- G. Plea dieere ate rele 8, 38, 92, 93, 94, i; logical distribution G. hirundOwcerestecmieetyste cia «6 of the species of,... 56 G. imdentusye. life's = = > 78, 79, A a Zoological affinities of, 6 G. Logani, 9, 20, 36, 38, 42, 98, 99, | GRAPTOPORA,..-.-++-.eee seer scenes 136 100, 101, 103, 106, 129, 139 G. Malesijs. cota ntien ess ; 42, 53 | Halles te see cece scene eee 61, 62, 63, 64 G. multifasciatus, ........++- TOS99: | Harknessterce srr settee itera 40, 62, 81 G. Murchisomi;..- 0225.2. .:.-. Al, 46 | Historical notice of the genus Grapto- G. INGSSOMT, 58 aft Scions wires wos 81 HGhW6)! pi. osc cote oe 59, 62 G. NitidUs; i oe. a 29, 69, 71, 85, 134 | Hisinger, .....000s.00 ceeeeece wees 40, 60 G. octobrachiatus, 8, 27, 29, 96, 101, | Hall (B.).....--- eee ces eee cere ee eeee 60 107, 134 | Hydroidea, analogy with graptolites, . 33 G. octonarius, ......-+.s6--- 95, 96 G. OVAUUE RE ec sdcicn eacds aes L2SMl elmantrale POUNt terieereletsersie|tielaleters Sonos,» Je) G. MIRED ood AOtoO OUCRIE 44,109 | INocAULIS, ---.----- Srctaferd) fe aetna 18, 49 G. [YAU od cone ily CR tO asker eAS ip Ie plumosus,....-.... ofe oisuiniele 18 G. pennatulus,..... 1, 29, 73, 82, 83 G. PIU. hah ee sss ess 27; 46" | Mimnheus ths vaae See ee eee Pe Pye NS G. pristis (Diplograptus), 15, 32, 34, | Logan,......++++++.sseeee rmapdcoios (ee! 36, 37, 40, 44, 45, 46, 109, 110, 146 G. putillus (Diplograptus), 27,44, 75 | Marmora, General de la,.....+..+++- 63 G. pristiniformis,....37, 84, 109, 110 | Mather,......0... 02+ -seeeeeee caylee G. quadribrachiatus, 30, 41, 71, 77, | McCoy,......---. 33, 40, 45, 46, 62, 64, me G8, 89,°91,:93; 129, 139 || McCrady;nrcia-'o'are's'stetetetate ate B G. quadrimucronatus,.......--- 144°) Meneohimi Sets ls eee velelen ole "40, 63 Be ramosus (Dicranograptus), 15, 31, | MonoGRapTus,.-..- Bhs mis cole efahaielistvtets 4, 65 34, 40, 41, 45, 46, 112, 146 | MonopRioN,......+...004- veee e+ 40,41, 65 G. ramulus,..... Sdo dood co0dobe HUA BUEN oon Goanomc hole ale cree ss fatale 6 G rectangularis,.......+..+-.+ 112 | Murchison, Sir R. mis oe es 6, 40, 60, 61 G. Richardsoni,.....0.0++++es- LOW | My rianitesy sc. ctes. scteninints o wie eine eno G. rigidus, 42, 105, 107, 108, 137, 138 G scalaris,..... ..eee5, 27,111,112 | Nature and form of graptolites,...... 5 G. SGiad PpaecoOoO Gnd 2.0000 Foe 41’ | NEMAGRAP TUR. ( 2 5: ott tacel see eater 43 G. serratulligyac.c' wet st ml 1, 78°} IN Capillaris;.%%% ne oe 0 eae ee G. sagittarius, 7,10, 41,44, 78, 81,98 | N. CLEMATIS, S26 ef eee cel sie eid tare ee G SEOMLANG: <1 0 15 sisi es F 1, 41, 46 | Nemapodia,....... sjaebe Gaels eyajatatales eames G BEAUTE eg eign on peaeeos (8, ci | Nemertitesss..ttrselta. ale siete ela teVelarelapete aaece G tentaculatum,......-.....--- 116 | Nereites,..... sogge aod ac Pe meiccyAor 2 G FENMIG; «3's 3% cioee ate .--.- 76, 144 | NEREOGRAPTUS,.......- = sda el TS oa a. teretinsculns,......+e.+++45, 112 | Nicol,..-.ssseeeeesse- eee aseecees 40, 62 G HESTISS iacai eretare Gee eects ar youll) Nilssonns,tavestclectars eters stars Societe: 6, 60 G WIT SUIAtOS, © ais © x ter oleic 72 | Notice, historical, of the genus Grap- G. IWihittiel di, <-%,ate claus 81, 33, 36, 37 tolithus,.........sse- COO aie: GraProLitipa, Analogy of, to 'Ceph- BLO POUR ys. 2 melee = ele Cin} (OMDHAMIO Eph sietctelevelsie Sieyaleie)e"s winlsislely MON “ Development in the, .. 32 | QO. fruticosa,.......... vases) OG ee General characters of,, 40 | Ornaments of graptolites,..........30, 32 INDEX. 151 PAGE. PAGE Pennatulide, .ccceces cencecnas oes .6, 32 | Sacs, reproductive,...... areal ercvaheve ais 32, 33 IRSHMIOMMIES 6 Gado DgdGogsHe Couns. oo00G 109) | Salter,.<.... 40, 41, 42, 46, 61, 63, 64, 136 elaWUbishocoalouc a faticteherseclatonetsiels) evel GIS | Scharenberg\ carotid eee eee 63 PHYLLOGRAPTUS, 16, 23, Heb Eerh Giijsish d| SOTO Nal eRe mona Gambon oohwdocar 5, 59 39, 48, 87, 88, 109, 118 SSA Snes a Sdh0bnoo0 acd dO 61 P. angustifolius, jadcene 16, 124, As) || Sectinleywecooocacs oe 24, 25, 32, 33 BP. AMT) cogoas Keo ode oooo aD ES 124 | Sertularide,...... Sig086 0 Raia lomoe 6% 32 Bs ilicifolins, 31, 83, 85, 120, 121, 123 | SrauRograpTus,............ doubsose 23 1. SUMMING eeugertercyaacis: <\stcye-e. o/nlotn 86, 87 | Stipe, its nature and form,........... 21 P. Gennseen vera, 119; 129198, 197.) Suess,-<00..2..6...0 cae hoe 6, 62 Plumularia,...... dobdotoves ne 25, 32, 139 Synopsis of the genera of Crain: Poxtlock-su-r sosdoossscoonr 6, i, 40, o Obed cecdmoon toma dee sdscbad be on 50 Polypiaria, 20O00, -ocoouddnobOBHbOGeD Synopsis of the spec from the Que- Pmowiiy De Jel, UA coaolgseoeubupGuoGD 52, 62 DECLELOMPs jah oferelereievorervarbersete 65, 68 EP TMEOGRAPMUS seis) ofele cic!) 6101<\«)- 5495139 Ptilograptus Geinitzianus,........ -- 140! Table showing the geological distribu- RB: plumosus, ..... anovg00 DOOD 140 tion of graptolites in Canada and the United States,......... 56, 58 Quenstedt, .......seeeeee seen. ---5, 60 | Table showing the vertical distribution ‘ of the genera of the family Grap- Radiata, Graptolites referred to,..... 32 tolitide: Mesum awning ae 55 Radicle or initial point in graptolites,. 19 | Test of graptolites, its nature and RASTRITES, «++... 16, 17, 25, 26, 43, 42 CHINN, GoboonasooG0 edd 21, 30, 32 . Barrandi,....... pte e eee es LGC ERAGE AP PUNT nihsin'uie see naiy ioe oi 41, 42 Reproduction in Graptolites,.. 32 | 'THAMNOGRAPTUS,..++2+0000000- 17, 49, 141 LSTEIDOIRE. 05 d ooo oo O Og O ebb Uoor 39 | p. AIT ge coco pe psn a ee iS aay Reriogrartus, 16, 19, 22, 24, 30, 31, 32, | p, WME Geoéauccooconcduaeus.: ill 36, 37, 38, 39, 47, 109, 113, 115, 120 R. GWG IME cogadnor 38, 68, 117, 146 R, tentaculatus,......... 67, 115, 116, 132 Bi aay i UE apne Rane oe e ReTIOLITES, 16, 22, 23, 28, 29, 30, ah 32, & DS aise y ban eet bse nai Boy STG Be) 46, 47, 109, 113, Ii 5, 116, THe R ensiformis, un eC 111, 114, TSG || Maeno Coop obo hdndbonoodoouc 5, 59 R. Geinitzianus,..... .....114, 116 R VENOSUS, --+.eneessee-eee-+ 114 | Zoological affinities of graptolites,... 6 ae Te bh tyil ae) 419) snl MienR eS, SAM PLATES. Plates A and B illustrate the structure of the Grapto- litidee as referred to in the Introduction, Chapter I. Plates I to XXI illustrate the species of Graptolitidze described in Chapter II and Supplement. ik i, ‘ i) ( ‘ ey a EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE A. CLIMACOGRAPTUS TYPICALIS, page 57. See observations on C. (G.) bicornis, etc., pages 27, 28, 30, 45, and 111. Figures 1—8 are enlarged to six diameters. Fig. 1. A lateral view of the concave side, with the surface entire, showing the form of ‘the cell-apertures. ‘ «2. A lateral view of the same, showing the entire form of the cell-apertures. “¢ 3. Lateral view of a fragment where the surface is exfoliated, showing the cell- partitions extending downwards towards the centre. “ 4, A longitudinal section made a little below the exterior surface, showing the cell- partitions extending further towards the interior than in fig. 3. “ 5, A longitudinal section through the centre, showing the cell-partitions reaching to the central axis. “« 6. A transverse section, showing the cell-partitions just within the aperture, and the minute central axis. “¢ 7. A transverse section made a little lower than in fig. 6, showing the cell-partitions extending across the stipe on one side, and on the other side showing the narrow triangular point near the centre. “ 8. A section made diagonally across a crushed stipe, showing the folding (from pressure) of two cell-divisions on each side of the centre. ““ 9. An ideal longitudinal section, showing the form and direction of the cell-parti- tions and the central axis, (enlarged to twelve diameters). GRAPTOLITHUS PUTILLUS, pages 27 and 44, Enlarged to twelve diameters. Fig. 10. A fragment of a stipe, showing the two ranges of cellules, their form, mode of growth, and the unfolding of the exterior test along the line of the central axis. ‘ 11. A lateral view of the same fragment, showing the cell-apertures and the flat- tening of the exterior of the base of the next cellules in advance, and the greater breadth of the cellules at the bases. “ 12. A longitudinal section through the centre of the stipe, showing the double cell-partitions and the double central axis. “ 12 a. A transverse section cutting one cellule near the aperture and the other near the base. CLIMACOGRAPTUS BICORNIS, pages 20, 21. (Graptolithus bicornis, Paleontology of New York, vol. i, page 268, and Geology of Canada, page 200.) Fig. 13. The lower part of a stipe enlarged to two diameters, showing the bifurcating process and a central node or radicle. “ 14, An enlargement to six diameters of a fragment which preserves in a very per- fect manner the bozder of the cellules, and shows an undulating central axis as well as the median ridge. «15. The base of a specimen showing three spine-like processes, (two diameters). “ 16. The lower extremity of a specimen showing a partially developed corneous disc, (two diameters). 11. The lower extremity of another specimen, showing a more complete disc or bulb at the base, (two diameters). EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE A, continued. Cuimacogrartus (sub-genus DicRANOGRAPTUS) RAMOSUS, pages 15, 31, 45, 46, and 112. (Graptolithus ramosus, Paleontology of New York, vol. i, page 27, and Geology of Canada, page 200.) Fig. 18. The lower part of a frond in which the base is entire, with the bifurcation above, (natural size). ‘¢ 19. The bifurcating portion, with a part of the simple stipe, showing the cells on one side as they are usually seen when flattened in the slate. On one por- tion of this there are oval pustules, which is a feature sometimes observed. The opposite side gives the appearance of the cellules when flattened and compressed partially against the aperture, (six diameters). “20. An enlargement from below the bifurcation, showing the more perfect form of the aperture, with the spines proceeding from the exterior surface above the aperture, (enlarged to six diameters) ; see page 31. 21, A young individual or germ, supposed to be of this species, showing the basal processes and the partially developed cellules at the upper part. See page 34. Geolegieal Survey of Canada, Sir W. ff. Logan, Director. j Decade 2. eas WOE Rieger a Plate 4 Graptclitide. cer cece NETTIE TET TN DIET RES R.P Whitfield Delt James Hall Descrip? cae UE lak par By ee, per eee (Pre a EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE B. GRAPTOLITHUS CLINTONENSIS, pages 25, 27, 29. (Paleontology of New York, vol. ii, page 39.) Figures 1, 2, and 4 are enlarged to six diameters, and figure 3 to nine diameters. Fig. 1. A fragment from near the base of a stipe, where the cellules are less developed 6c 19 than in other specimens. The cellules are partially filled with mineral matter and have an angular form. 2. A lateral view of a part of a mature stipe, showing the form of the cellules, and the recurved extremities causing the apertures to open downwards. The specimen is filled with mineral matter. 3. A front view of a part of the same stipe, showing the lateral extent of the cell- bases and the expansion at the aperture. 4, A dorsal view of the same, showing a groove which indicates the place of the solid axis. 5. A branch of DicryonEMA GRACILIS (page 29), showing the serrated margin indi- cating cell-apertures; (enlarged six diameters). GRAPTOLITHUS WHITFIELDI, pages 32, 33, and 36. Figures 6-10 are of natural size; figure 11 is enlarged to two diameters. Fig. 6. A stipe showing serratures, with a few partially developed reproductive sacs in the upper part. 7. A stipe where the sacs are more fully developed. 8. A stipe with numerous reproductive sacs, some of which have apparently be- come dehiscent, and exhibit numerous extremely slender fibres. (In connection with one of these sacs there are two minute germs, one of them lying beneath the sac, and the other just beyond its outer margin and barely separated from its fibres. See fig. 11.) 9. A stipe with a few of the sacs remaining, and the bases of some others which have apparently been broken off. One of these sacs appears to be attached to the axis above the cellules and lying beneath the axis. 10. A stipe from which the reproductive sacs have been removed (by maceration), showing only the marginal fibres by which they were attached to the axis of the parent stipe. Some of these remain connected with the axis in its extension beyond the cellules. “ Il. An enlargement of a single sac, from fig. 8, showing the position of the two germs. EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE B, continued. GERMS OF GRAPTOLITES. Figures 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, are germs of Graptolites enlarged to six diame- ters. (See pages 33 and 34.) Fig. 12. A germ of a biserrate form, before the cellules have assumed distinctive shape. The axis is extended, and the common body spreads on both sides in the lower part, the cellules embracing the lateral processes, which are seen at the base of most of the diprionidian forms, and extending along one side of the axis above. “ 13. A form similar to fig. 12, a little farther advanced, where the lower cellules have begun to assume their proper form. “14, Another form of germ resembling G. ciliatus; the ciliated processes are visible beyond the limits of the sac, but the cellules appear not to have assumed definite form. “15. A young individual of G. ciliatus, (natural size). “* 16. A discoid germ. This may be the central disc of a compound form of Grap- tolithus. “* 17. A germ showing the common body extended on the two sides of the axis, but without any visible or apparent cellules. “¢ 18. A germ where the common body or sac is much expanded on the two sides of the axis, and the central portion is apparently becoming more solid. “ 19. A germ where the solid axis is on one side; the species probably belongs to the monoprionidian type. RETIOLITES VENOSUS, pages 22, 47, 113, and 114. (Palzontology of New York, vol. ii, page 40.) The figures are enlarged to nine diameters. Fig. 20. The exterior of the convex (?) side, showing the external axis and cell-parti- tions, with the intermediate reticulate texture. ‘¢ 21. Another view, apparently from the interior (see page 47), showing an undulat- ing or zig-zag axis, with cylindrical processes extending to the margins, and short, apparently broken processes directed obliquely upwards. The reticulate structure is not essentially different from that of the other side. rarer, ¢ Oxee at Se Jirec san. 1 i) cal Seve ir W.E.Lo » ie Q 12) Lag Swanton Lith Hall Descrip* James R.P Whitfield Delt SO he ee) eth Pre! a8 Boe ed VT Tha Pe a err ea 1 eres ore yn a eo. oa ae a i , i} wei he ae | 1 * Ms an Ul 4 ‘ t ‘ ~ i « ; 1 \ J aii | i | f . 1 1 f 7 ; . 7 Ay - ‘ * ~ ‘ rd S ts , i , a ; Pap A A eT SARReR ae fi i i i ‘ i Pio ae oe Yori f we i Maer eu cored Wat Me ini vtaen 4 4 "y a Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. 16. 17. 18. 20. Zi 22. 23. 24, 25. 26. 27. EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE I. GRAPTOLITHUS NITIDUS, page 69. A young individual with the radicle and the two stipes. . The extremity of a stipe enlarged, showing the partially-developed cellules. . A larger specimen similar in character to fig. 1, showing the pustules at the base of the cellules. The extremities are not quite entire. . A part of the left side of fig. 3 enlarged, showing the pustuliform elevations. . An enlargement from fig. 8, with the cellules obliquely compressed and the pustules obscure. . Two smaller individuals, which, from juxtaposition and similarity, seem as if they may have originated from a common base. . An impression of a more extended form, proportionally narrower than fig. 3. . A still narrower stipe, diverging almost rectangularly from the direction of the radicle. . A well-preserved small individual, enlarged three diameters. GRAPTOLITHUS PATULUS, page 71. . A specimen preserving the radicle, and a stipe on one side two and a half inches in length. . The distal extremity of a larger stipe. Some of the cells are filled with pyrites. . A short stipe broken off near the radicle, showing the narrow form near the base, and a width beyond greater than in ordinary forms. . A part of fig. 12 enlarged. . A part still further enlarged to show the strie parallel to the cell-apertures. . An enlargement from fig. 11, where some of the cells are filled with iron pyrites showing their extension almost to the back of the stipe. GRAPTOLITHUS BIFIDUS, page 73. A small specimen from the same fragment of slate with fig. 17. An individual of ordinary size. An enlargement of the upper part of one stipe of fig. 17. GRAPTOLITHUS INDENTUS, page 74, An individual of the natural size, the continuation of the stipes having been broken off on ode side. GRAPTOLITHUS EXTENUATUS, page 75. A fragment of the stipe, natural size. A portion of the lower extremity enlarged ; a part of the specimen retaining the substance of the fossil, and a part being an impression in the slate. GRAPTOLITHUS CONSTRICTUS, page 76. A young individual, natural size. An older specimen, the stipe broken off on one side. A part of a much more extended stipe, but which is not wider than fig. 23. A part of a stipe from Gros Maule. An enlargement of the last, showing the form of cells, the cell-denticles or apertures, and the characteristic apparent constriction. Canada. Shee Sir W. hogan, Director. LIECAME F. ss 1 te Graptolitidee. Geological Survey of Lewer Uy Le YY LL Waa ULM Tiff} y James Hall, Descrpt James Duthie, Sc. a) ; ; ; 7] in) mint ay pail. dh © as 3 ti hen p : re b. Ralans), Oe ie ea em TqKNN AY ah EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE II. GRAPTOLITHUS SIMILIS, page 78. Fig. 1. A very young individual of this species. “9. An individual somewhat more mature. “ 3. An enlargement showing the form of the radicle, and the cells near their origin, with a non-celluliferous space between. “ 4, A fragment of a longer stipe, which is imperfect at both extremities. “ 5, An enlargement of fig. 4. GEAPTOLITHUS ARCUATUS, page 179. Fig. 6. A stipe of a small individual, more than usually curved. “ 7, A stipe having a process just above and opposite the radicle. “ g. A larger stipe, the cellules very clearly preserved. “ 9, A specimen showing the stipes on both sides of the radicle, and preserving their peculiar curvature very perfectly. ‘10. An enlargement of a portion from figure 8. GRAPTOLITHUS EXTENSUS, page 80. Fig. 11. A single stipe more than four inches long, with the radicle and base of the opposite stipe. “ 12. A fragment showing a part of the stipe on each side of the radicle, natural size. “ 13. The radicle and adjacent cellules, enlarged from fig. 12. “ 14, An enlargement of fig. 12 at a point about two inches from the radicle. 15. A fragment of a stipe where the cellules are distended by iron pyrites. 16. An enlargement from fig. 15. GRAPTOLITHUS FLACCIDUS, page 143. Fig. 17. A portion of a large fragment of slate, with parts of several individuals upon the surface; and showing the origin of eight individuals in the minute radicles. Some of these are indicated by asterisks on the engraving. ‘© 18, An enlargement to three diameters of the radicle and stipe-bases, with the cellules. From the point a on fig. 17. ‘ 19, A farther enlargement of a portion to show the form of the collabess and the pustuliform appearances at the base of the divisions between them. Geologterl Survev ot Canada. oir W. &. Logan, Director. R Graptolitades DPecade 7. Plate 2. Lower Stluriaw. Guehee Group, SEGUE: YY iffy tHYY) Ly Yj ] yy i) fy Yi WME Vy Wf WY hy Uf Mbebusssisas iii WV . ] YY] TD y LU Vij Yi —- My ij Wis YW “Wy Ty z Uy YY Ye Yy Ly Cy Wy - ‘Gl James Hall, Mescrp James Duthis, Se i Bias lisse, Ys ae a ki By Yuan iy. ee Sao mya ty ti, ae i ‘ : ‘ yi! iat EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE III. GRAPTOLITHUS PENNATULUS, page 82. Fig. 1. A young specimen with the minute radicle, the stipes diverging almost horizontally, or rectangularly to the radicle. “© 9, A young specimen with one stipe entire, and a part of the other, less diverg- ing than fig. 1. “© 3. A single imperfect stipe of a young or half-grown individual, which is nar- rower than usual. “ 4, A larger stipe, which is entire from the base to the apex. “5. A large or full-grown single stipe, which is nearly entire. 6, Anenlargement to three diameters from fig. 4, showing the form and propor- tion of the cellules, and cell-denticles. «© 4, An enlargement to the same degree as the preceding, from fig. 5. “© g, A young specimen where the stipes are twisted near the base, giving an appear- ance as if the serrations were on the outer or lower side in relation to the direction of the radicle. GRAPTOLITHUS BIFIDUS, page 73. Fig. 9. An individual from the river St. Anne, showing a greater divergence of the stipes, which are wider than those from Point Lévis. (See plate i.) « 10, An enlargement from one of the stipes of the preceding, showing the form of serratures, and the minute pustules at the base of the cell-divisions. GRAPTOLITHUS BRYONOIDES, page 84. Fig. 11. A fragment of a stipe from the rough shales containing Phyllograptus ilicifolius. In the character of the cell-denticles it resembles the specimen pl. iv, fig. 9 and with that one may constitute a distinct species. « 12, An enlargement of a part of the specimen fig. 11. Geological Survey of Canada. Sir WE. Logan, Divecter. Decade 2. : ay ieee ae Plate 3 | Suseuehr e. Quebec Group. Lower Siluzian. RR. P Whitfield.Delt James Hall, Deserp+* James Wuthie,Se. . + y 4i wd} y - me i pay, eV a iy) qe Saul Poeowproy.« org ads Bites 1] GMMR A gaia Ot we Tin Ki Lat tah | utter pA Cpe” AF: a - ve + ie 1h) Bday re wo-c) 4) eo atlas ett af A : a ‘ ellis walt Yn Fd oli Beiy ha dhe > hy sara 7) cae pa #i ey Fm!” dtrer eases TY) NFUIS4 ORY paste li ip~rGi pees si - ae "pHa glabineal Mb oe teitie nos Date emiedemim eA i ES c =” a ee Pe | eee ‘ ¥ cad a ' > » > a EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE IY. GRAPTOLITHUS BRYONOIDES, page 84. Figs. 1, 2, 3. Young individuals of this species. 4, An older individual. “© 5, A young specimen preserving two of the stipes, the funicle having been broken. 6. An enlargement from fig. 1, showing the radicle, funicle, and origin of the four stipes, with a few of the earlier cellules. . An older and larger specimen. . An enlargement from fig. 7 showing the character and proportions of the cellules. 9, A small individual, preserving the four stipes in part, which are somewhat more slender than the usual forms of this species. “ 10. An enlargement of the base of the specimen, showing the cell-denticles on one of the stipes, and a proportionally longer funicle than in fig. 8. « 11, An extremely elongated stipe, the lower end showing the commencement of growth; the distal extremity is broken. oO -T «*, Figs. 9 and 10 may possibly prove to be distinct species. (See pl. iii, figs. 11, 12.) GRAPTOLITHUS DENTICULATUS, page 88. Fig. 12. A small imperfect specimen, preserving three of the stipes. «© 13, A larger and more nearly entire specimen, showing the four stipes. Their junc- tion at the base is not quite satisfactorily shown. “© 14, A part of a single stipe, in which the cellules are well shown on one part; while they are compressed and nearly obliterated on the left of the curve. © 15, An impression of a part of a stipe which is nearly straight; the imprint of the axis or thickened margin is not defined. “© 16, An enlargement from figure 14, showing the form of the cell-denticles, and the strong marginal axes; one portion represented with the substance remaining, and the other as an imprint. Geologterl Suevey of Canada. Sir W. &.. Logan, Director. : Say sat abate b hea 17 W, By L Oxe I C L Pike ma Leekae 2 - ‘ ie i Fluent CALS LS BRCEE Quebec Group wer Silurian. E Quel i 1 ty YEE Ss SS SSSSS Lg ee Yj Ly Li, SS S SSS LED vo y Vio q yi YY. Yip, >. WS WS SY S ~~ WS SG 13 POT ELPEZE Y, ae Ley Wi fp, i) tYypyyyo ij EEG Tomes Dutmes. James Hall, Desérpt James Duthie,Sc a hs save als Adi ss vi ay are EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE V. GRAPTOLITHUS QUADRIBRACHIATUS, page 91. . A large specimen with stipes vertically compressed. . A young specimen in which one of the stipes appears to be subdivided. . An individual with stipes a little curved, the back of the stipe visible, and showing no serratures. . A frond with one of the stipes broken off; one showing the cellules and dis- tinct strie parallel to the cell-partitions, while the other two are turned so as to obscure the cellules. . An enlargement from fig. 1: the stipe has been vertically compressed, causing the cellules to show a less angle with the stipe than in the normal condition. GRAPTOLITHUS FRUTICOSUS, page 90. . A small individual with the extremities of the radicle and stipes broken off. . An enlargement from fig. 6. The serratures are either imperfect or shrunken, and do not present the characters seen in better-preserved specimens. . An individual nearly entire, with an extremely long and slender radicle, but imperfectly preserved in the outline of its parts. GRAPTOLITHUS PENNATULUS, page 82. Fig. 9. Asingle stipe of this species? The specimen isa large stipe, somewhat obscurely preserved upon the surface of a slab of slate, with G. extensus, G. bryon- oides, and Phyllograptus ilicifolius. It is from the same locality with G. bifidus at Point Lévis. In the form of the stipe, and its gradual diminu- tion towards the distal extremity, as well as in the absence of visible pus- tules at the base of the cellules, it has the habit of G. pennatulus. Being the only individual observed from this locality, and the resemblance to G. bifidus being very close, I have referred it with much hesitation to G. pennatulus. GRAPTOLITHUS CRUCIFER, page 92. Fig. 10. View of the specimen from which the description is drawn. “ce 13. The dise of a young individual probably of this species. GraprTouitHus Hzapi(?) page 94. Figs. 11 and 12. The central discs of two individuals which may belong to G. Headi. Sk ee Ed ‘y bt - Geologteal Survey of Canada, Sir W. EF. Logan Director. = : Flaite &. Graptolindee. 5 Yy yy / Y jj Yi | Wy Vell < Yi: Yyyfy Guy rap YY 7) 7 Y Gyifiy, : EOP Wise Delt James Hall Descrp James Duthis 5c. on UE SEE AGEE DOU PMY E ASE VU aerate) fe EE Py ; vl “y LAA g hie OAT ate @ te St eid T riser ie +e me She i f Pe :h M ie aie: ie Marge ees 2a nit oe . “. oe woe ty iby ate “ hy TEE ii t Ke at 7 head sins? Mat : CA ‘ Da Thy | i‘ DEAs tad ie lgatce Tr et we ewe P Tt | ae Fig. 4, Fig. 5. Fig. 7. Fig. 8. Fig. 9. EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE VI. GRAPTOLITHUS FRUTICOSUS, page 90. A fragment showing two of the stipes entire, and the bases of two others; the radicle extending to the margin of the specimen. . Aspecimen preserving three of the stipes, one of them entire, and showing some irregularities in the bifurcation where the one is broken off. . An enlargement of the right-hand stipe of the specimen fig. 1. GRAPTOLITHUS BRYONOIDES, page 84. A frond in which three of the stipes, and the base of the fourth, are preserved. The specimen shows some peculiarity in the union of the parts by the slender funicle. From the river Ste. Anne. GRAPTOLITHUS QUADRIBRACHIATUS, page 91. A frond preserving one stipe partially entire, and others broken off: the funicle and radicle-point are well preserved. . An enlargement from the specimen fig. 5, showing the form and proportions of cellules in their more perfect preservation, with the striz parallel to the cell- margins well preserved. GRAPTOLITHUS CRUCIFER? page 92. A central dise of G. crucifer, with the bases of the branches. Graprotiraus Hwan, page 94. A representation of the specimen of the natural size, and as it occurs on the surface of the stone. (The upper separated portion of the stipe is placed a little lower in the figure than it is on the stone, in order to bring it within the dimensions of the plate.) GRAPTOLITHUS ALATUS, page 93. The specimen represented as it occurs on a fragment of slate. The back of the stipes shows faint indentations, but they are made too strong in the engraving. Geological Survey of Canada. a s 8 ~s . 2 ra (o) ae) oO ie) Blea B eae a iq aoe Se: = ofl ji} 1S) fA oo iva) eon 8-2 88 8 Ny Group. ip Vy jy James Hall, Descrp! James Duthie,Sc. “RL P. Whitfield, Del} Bigs: te 6. zt ee EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE VII. GRAPTOLITHUS OCTOBRACHIATUS, page 96. A large individual preserving two of the stipes to the length of eight inches, and another to nearly the same extent, while the rest are broken off at less distances from the disc. The flexibility of their substance is well shown in the recurved stipe at the left-hand side of the figures. Although this speci- men preserves the most extended stipes of any in the collection, the disc is smaller than in several of the other specimens. . The exterior ofa large disc of this species, with the stipes broken off a little beyond its margin. The two longer portions are so turned as to show the cellules. . A portion of a large disc, showing the exterior or non-celluliferous face of the frond, and preserving portions of four of the stipes. . A frond with the stipes broken off at different distances from the centre. The substance of the disc or cup is imperfect,—a condition which apparently existed while the body was in a living state. . An enlargement from one of the stipes of fig. 1, at c, looking upon the apertures of the cellules, which are somewhat compressed. An enlargement from the same at b, where the substance is laterally compressed. An enlargement from the same, where the substance is obliquely compressed at a. Figs. 5 and 7 are taken from casts made in the impressions left by removal of the substance of the graptolite. Decate Z. Lower Silurian. Geological Survey ot Canada, Sir W, E.. Logan, Director ‘ Grap tolitide, © BE, Whithela Del James Duthie 4 EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE VIII. GRAPTOLITHUS OCTOBRACHIATUS, page 96. Fig. 1. A symmetrical frond preserving parts of all the stipes, two of them apparently almost entire ; several of them had been abruptly bent before being im- bedded in the stone. 2. A frond preserving eight stipes, but without a disc. The specimen does not afford any evidence that a disc has ever existed. “ 3. A frond with small disc and somewhat slender stipes. One side preserves the usual character of four stipes, while the other has but three. “ 4, A frond which is abnormally developed ; one side exhibiting the four stipes with the disc, while on the other side the funicle is apparently extended in a single stipe only. GOeologwal Survey ot Canada, ; Sir W, E.Loéan, Director . Decade 7. . ee fate 8. Graptolitide. Lower Silurian. Quebec Group. : all B.P. Whitfied Delt James Hall, Descrp James Duthie,Sc. » | bait’ 4 iy wie Re Ae ie Fay ree} een EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE IX. GrapToLitaus Logani, page 100. Fig. 1. A specimen of slate, preserving portions of three individuals (two only given “ a“ in the illustration). The disc had probably been removed by maceration before they were imbedded, but the stipes are preserved to a length of more than seven inches. It does not appear that this exhibits the entire skeleton : the stipes were originally longer. The serrated margins are not always shown at equal distances from the centre; but this is due to acci- dental position, some stipes showing the exterior surface for some distance, and then gradually turning and becoming flattened laterally. . A specimen showing the disc almost entire. . An individual showing the exterior surface the central portions entire, with the impression of the connecting disc, some portions of which remain attached to the stipes. The extent and outline of the disc are distinctly seen. The appearance of serratures is due to exfoliation, which shows the impres- sion of the celluliferous side of the stipe upon the stone. . A specimen exhibiting the half of an individual, with the disc unequally ex- tended between the rays. The margins are all apparently entire, and this inequality, to whatever accident due, existed in the living animal. . Exterior view of an individual showing some remaining portions of the disc; the stipes are all broken off beyond the bifurcations. - Another individual showing the inner side, with the commencement of the cells, which appear in some places in double series. The substance of the dise is removed. . Enlargement of the exterior surface of the central portion of the specimen fig. 5. . Enlargement of the inner surface of the specimen fig. 6, giving the appearance of a double series of cells separated by a depressed line in the substance of the stipe. Sometimes this separation appears to be actual, while else- where the apparent division is due to the depression along the centre. . Enlargement of a fragment of a stipe, showing the form and proportions of the cellules. Grologteal Surven of Canada, Sir W. E. Logan. Director. cade 2 Graptolitids — a _ ” Famne Dushie Se. EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE X. GRAPTOLITHUS OCTONARIUS, page 95. Fig. 1. A specimen of natural size, much broken and distorted from pressure. ‘“¢ 2. An enlargement from the preceding figure. GRAPTOLITHUS FLEXILIS, page 103. Fig. 3. A fragment of slate preserving more than half of a frond, and showing the folding and crossing of some of the branches. “« 4, A fragment preserving parts of three individuals, the extremities of the branches all broken off. “ 5. The central portion of the frond of another individual. . Separated branches preserving the cellules in unusual perfection. “ 7. An enlargement of the centre of the frond, fig. 5, showing the short radicle and the usual mode of branching. The central part of the axis is rounded, with a narrow corneous alation at the sides. “ 8. A bifurcated fragment enlarged, from fig. 4: the cellules have been flattened vertically, causing them to be visible in slight indentations on both sides of the axis. 9. A portion of a branchlet enlarged from fig. 6, showing one part compressed laterally, with the cellules fully expanded, while the other, on the right hand, is gradually twisted so as to show only the back of the branchlet. ~ for) 4 > | a x oe c Pana ae > iy if AX s NX y Geological Surwen of Canada. gin ees Dir, W. = . Lo Bet eimerion: Ze Lower Silurian. = raptol tides. Quebee Croup, — sy ices he ase TTT are te SPer eyo fe Be Ys ZG i oe ey Lo iy B.P.Whitheld Delt James Hall, Descrpt James Duthie,Se. Fig. 7. EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE XI. GRAPTOLITHUS RIGIDUS, page 105. . A fragment preserving the centre and principal branches. . A larger specimen, showing the principal ramifications of the branches. This and the preceding specimen show only what appears to be the non-cellu- liferous portion of the frond. . The extreme parts of some branchlets laterally compressed, showing the cellu- liferous parts of the frond. . An enlargement of one of the branchlets of fig. 3. . A strong branch with part of the branchlets, showing the lower side or non- celluliferous portion of the frond. GRAPTOLITHUS ABNORMIS, page 106. . A fragment of slate preserving the centre and the branches on one side to beyond the first bifurcation. The other side is imperfect, and apparently less developed. GraprTouitaus Loeant, page 100. The central part of an individual without disc, showing five stipes on one side and four on the other. This is supposed to be an abnormal form of G, Logani. Director aa, », Log James Duthie, Sc \ \ SS \ AW \ io . \ \ iS ’ A \ \ \ . ‘ \ NY Wesorp+ iw Se A Nii \\ \ \ RANA = ESAS nn — ASX \ NX \ A\\ \ N NN \ Ws WAN Graptolitide. James Hall. =i We : A S 1 ui 3 ie A cl by d : : 3 , : 3] i ~ | lk itn bem? seattanctetig Alyy \ Magn aeypintae “ YY v Fig. cl EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE XII. GRAPTOLITHUS RICHARDSONI, page 107. . A fragment of slate, preserving a stipe, with six branches in its apparent con- tinuation, and impressions of two others in the intermediate space ; two of these again bifurcating. . A fragment preserving several branchlets, which are compressed in different directions, showing the sides and apertures of the cellules. . An impression of a bifurcating fragment, the cellules of which were filled with mineral matter and vertically compressed. 4, A fragment of a branch laterally compressed. . The impression of a bifurcating branch where the cellules are somewhat obliquely compressed, and partially filled with mineral matter. 6. A fragment enlarged, giving a lateral view of the cellules. 7. An enlargement from an impression of a branchlet, from fig. 5, which is obliquely compressed, having the cellules filled with mineral matter. . Enlargement of a fragment, from fig. 1, where the cellules are filled with min- eral matter and vertically compressed. GRAPTOLITHUS RAMULUS, page 108. 9. A small bifurcating branch. 10. An enlargement of fig. 9, showing the form and extent of the cellules. Geologterl Survey of Canada. Sir W. E..Logan,Director. Decade 2: Lower Stluzian. Graptolitida A. P, Whitheld Delt James Hall,Deserpt Jamies Duthie, Se. eeik INT Pitted acreysie 4 pa)? tee Mo brh? Skt 0: Peer pe ‘pile. atl deg Seer pianaint tela: sn see ta 1 Alea ErowEReMe © ix hap} ve ashrretuibiis give he bi oneig ik AM | : eae | 1 See EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE XIII. GRAPTOLITHUS QUADRIMUCRONATUS, page 144. Fig. 1. Part of a stipe compressed in a slightly oblique direction, still showing the cellules on the two sides. 2. A stipe compressed more obliquely, so as nearly to obscure the cellules on one side. 3. A specimen compressed vertically to the celluliferous side of the stipe. 4,5, and 6. Enlargements from specimens, figs. 1, 2, and 3 respectively. 7. Enlargement from a specimen where the solid axis lies near to one side. 8. A specimen obliquely compressed, so that the mucronate points at one angle of the cellules of the left side, are pressed through the test, and show on the surface as a range of pustules. The axis is displaced, and seen on one side of the centre. 9. A diagram representing a theoretical longitudinal section. 10. A transverse section of a stipe with the mucronate extensions of the cell- margins. (73 “ CLIMACOGRAPTUS ANTENNARIUS, page 112. Fig. 11. A young individual, compressed in such a manner that the cell-apertures are not shown upon the margin. 12. A flattened stipe, presenting only the mucronate terminations of the cell- apertures beyond the margin. 13. An older individual, showing the margins of the stipe extending beyond the cell-apertures, while the cellules are visible in the substance of the stipes as darker areas. DIPLOGRAPTUS INUTILIS, page 111. Fig. 14. A piece of slate preserving fragments of two individuals. DIPLOGRAPTUS PRISTINIFORMIS, page 110. Fig. 15. A fragment of a stipe, showing the usual form and proportions of the best- preserved specimens. 16. A smaller individual, with the mid-rib or axis extending beyond the body of the stipe. 17. An enlargement from fig. 16, showing more distinctly the form of the cellules. D nN i A Lelie >t sade Z. Det Cc Croup uebe & > ower Stiutian. 4 uthie, Sc, > st Jame = erpt eS s Hall, Jame 1d. Delt Whatfie V VE’. ” ‘i IO ee as ° ead Di Pett op! 5G ‘ EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE XIV. RETIOLITES ENSIFORMIS, page 114. Figs. 1, 2, 3. Individuals showing gradations in growth, and slight differences in their proportions. 4. A nearly entire stipe of the largest size observed. 5. An enlargement from the specimen fig. 2. a “ce RETIOGRAPTUS TENTACULATUS, page 116. Fig. 6. An individual of the natural size, with the marginal reticulations nearly entire. “ 7, The preceding specimen enlarged. 8. An enlargement of another individual, where the marginal reticulations are but partially preserved. ce RETIOGRAPTUS EUCHARIS, page 146. Fig. 9. An illustration of a compound form of the genus, enlarged to four diameters. Decade 2. Lower Silurian . (Ib ci Logierl Suemey of Canad. “Sit W. Bi. Logan, Director. Graptolitide:. Plate 14 Quebec Group. Wi FUP. Whitfield Delt James Hall, Descrp © James Tuthie,Sc Ay Moiese 9.3 bp 9 Peer mips Ady : omhewtty wade e ey _— r - ’ WeIGA RA) Sen wie! does PPR A NH sy ay ae te Mb piter bine Fig. 1. “2, eb m2): EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE XV. PHYLLOGRAPTUS TYPUS, page 119. An extremely short and broad form of this species, with the axis broad, and showing some remains of the cellules at the base of the separated division. An elongate-ovate form of stipe, with a broad axis, which does not show remains of cellules. Some of the cellules in the upper part of the stipe are filled with iron pyrites. . A form similar to the preceding, showing remains of cellules on the upper part of the axis. . An elliptical form of stipe, where two of the divisions have been separated leaving the bases of two sets of cellules. . A broadly elliptical form, from which two of the divisions and the axis have been removed; showing the bases of the cellules of the folia which remain in the slate. . A stipe compressed in the same direction as fig. 3 of the generic illustrations page 119; with a part of one of the folia removed, but not reaching to the axis. The lines of the cell-partitions appear as if continued across the axis. . An elongate-lanceolate form of stipe, which does not show cellules in the line of the axis. . An elongate-elliptical and very symmetrical specimen, showing the marks of cellules along the axis, which is unusually narrow. . A part of a stipe folded in the manner of fig. 6, the upper portion of one side preserving only the impression of the substance. In the lower part, the cell-markings on the axis should be shown more distinctly. . A group of small stipes upon the surface of a piece of shale. These are given in their natural size and in their actual relations to each other. . An enlargement of a part of an impression of a stipe which has been flattened in the direction of figs. 6 and 9. A portion of the substance remains, as shown on the left hand; the cellules filled with iron pyrites. An enlarged portion from a stipe, showing the double cell-denticles and corresponding cell-partitions. The narrow spaces on the surface of the figure are more elevated than the wider ones, with a greater thickness of the substance; which I suppose may have been caused by the cell- partitions, which are obliquely compressed, thus showing the cell-denticles. These elevated spaces become gradually narrower towards the axis, in accordance with the form of the cells, as shown in the theoretical figure 10 plate xvi. © Fi, Logan, Director: Sun: WwW, oO Decade 2. Lower Silirian. Quebee Group, (as BREE Vy Vth; / WAT B a a ey 5) ef 13} ( James Duthie, Se. James Hall,De id, Delt Le e i Whit Bue. EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE XVI. e PHYLLOGRAPTUS ILICIFOLIUS, page 121. Fig. 1. An individual of the natural size, where the folia 6, a* are broken entirely away beyond the axis, leaving the bases of the cellules of two adjacent folia visible, except at the upper part of the figure, where two or three of the bases of the other cellules remain. 2. A similar specimen, showing the bases of a set of cellules on each side of the centre, with two or three of those belonging to the broken folium at the base of the figure. ; “ 3. An enlargement of fig. 2, showing more distinctly the cellules on each side £4 14 if ef the central line, and the small remaining portion at the base. 4, A specimen of the natural size, where one folium is broken away not quite so far as the axis, leaving the bases of its cellules visible. 5. An enlarged figure from a specimen which has been imbedded transversely. Three of the divisions have been broken away, leaving impressions of the lateral ones only, and of the cell-bases and cell-partitions of the fourth division, which are directed obliquely upwards from the axis and point of view. The lower part of the specimen preserves a portion of the lateral folia, with the bases of the cells of the outer division a*, which are directed towards the axis. 6. An enlargement of a specimen which is imbedded obliquely, or in a direc- tion as if the theoretical figure 10 were vertically compressed, leaving no visible axis. In the lower half of the specimen, the fossil has been separated in the opposite slaty laminz, leaving only the impression of that side, which also shows no axis. In the upper half of the specimen, the cel- lules are well preserved, and on the left-hand side the apertures are con- spicuous. Enlarged to three diameters. It will be observed that the impression is not quite in the same direction as the outline in the upper portion of the figure, owing to the obliquely- compressed folia. 7. A specimen compressed in the same manner as fig. 6; the upper folia have however been separated, except the bases of a few of the cellules in the upper part of the figure, leaving the other two folia imbedded in the shale, and showing the bases of their cellules ascending from the axis. Enlarged to three diameters, as in fig. 6. 8. An enlarged figure of a specimen compressed in the direction first described, without any separation of the parts; from which cause there is no proper axis visible. In this condition, thespecimens resemble Graptolithus folium of Hisinger, or G. ovatus of Barrande. 9. An enlargement of a specimen compressed as in fig. 8, but with the cellules filled, and the margins of the upper two folia broken, showing the cell- openings. (8 and 9 are enlarged to twice their natural size.) 10. A restoration of the form of P. ilicifolius, showing the four divisions ; which are represented as cut through transversely, exhibiting the cell-cavities. * These letters refer to the illustrative figures, page 119. EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE XVI, continued. PuyLiograPtTus ANNA, page 124. Fig. 11. A specimen with the folia obliquely compressed. ce ec ts 12, 13, 14. Individuals showing some varieties of form. The specimens have all been so imbedded that one of the folia has been torn away in the separated lamine of shale, leaving an axis marked by the bases of its cellules. 15. An enlargement of a specimen which has one of the lamin vertically im- bedded, and shows the bases of the cells as they recede from the axis. The markings at the sides are from the impressions of the folia, except a small fragment of one remaining on the left-hand side of the figure. 16. An enlargement from a specimen where the two lateral folia remain, showing the bases of the cells of the folium which has been broken off, in the separated lamine of slate. The surface is distinctly striated. PHYLLOGRAPTUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS, page 125. Fig. 17. A small and comparatively wide specimen, with a distinct linear axis, but ce without evidence of cellules. 18. A more elongate specimen, with distinct axis, with a darker line in the centre. 19, 20, 21. Varieties of form and proportion. The specimen fig. 21 is the largest observed. This species is placed under Phyllograptus from its similarity in form to others of the genus, although evidence of the quadruple division has not been established. The want of parallelism of the margins, and the sub- elliptical form would, I conceive, be sufficient to remove it from the genus Diplograptus. GRAPTOLITHUS BiesByI, page 86. Figs. 22, 23, and 24 illustrate a common condition of this species, where two of the cc ce “ divisions show the lateral faces, while the non-celluliferous edge of a third division is seen lying nearly vertically in relation to these. The fourth division has been broken off in the separated film of slate. 25. A specimen showing the lateral faces of two divisions. Below these, in the shale, are seen the non-celluliferous edges of the two other divisions. 29 and 30 show a still closer arrangement of the parts, and the contiguity of the non-celluliferous edges at the apices, which are scarcely perceptibly separated in the shale. 26. An individual where the apices of the divisions are in contact, either conjoined, or accidentally so placed, with a narrow space in the centre. In obscure specimens it is difficult to separate such forms from Phyllograptus. 27. An individual where the divisions are equally spreading: one of them pre- serving only the base of the stipe. 28. The same enlarged. ah James ,Deserps ey fie VP Se ey oe 7 EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE XVII, DENDROGRAPTUS FLEXUOSUS, page 127. Fig. 1. A small frond of the natural size. 2. A part of a larger frond. DENDROGRAPTUS DIVERGENS, page 129. Figs. 3, 4. A specimen of natural size, and an enlargement of the same. DENDROGRAPTUS STRIATUS, page 129. Fig. 5. A fragment of a frond, preserving the bases of some of the branches. “ 6. A portion of the non-celluliferous surface enlarged. DENDROGRAPTUS ERECTUS, page 130. Fig. 7. The principal stipe, and bases of some of the branches, of the natural size. DENDROGRAPTUS FRUTICOSUS, page 131. Fig. 8. A frond which is apparently nearly entire. «“ 9. A more diffuse form of the same species, with some of the branches broken off. of Canada. ‘a Director. wrveD Loean. = = ao G me Wi Cx 5 Ogr e L Geol raptohitide . IS Yip ETE. LEI. n YH YY YY g Cie: GA\S Y ‘Sips YY, MN = 8 <— ey Zi\ . iY YY ss Wy We & Yy MM iy, | VL Yj Yy yy U4); Y Y/ A tip. Up ¢; Z EE Yj; YHyy Yj Wy Yj Yue LE, DS ip Yj _ : GAEL lig GY Ys Y Yi iy , yy Wi Wy j; y Y Uy Yj Yy rh fe oO } iy) Yy, 5 ‘D 4 Ly Yh yi YG Ui, La Yj 7) > E B Yi YyYyf 4 eit j by Y Sr tYyy Yj Z Wy, MU), Z YY : Yy Yy j Fi ys i ee Y D7 < UY yy Mies \ [rele 5, Uy g e nu ~ So Wie pe YU KN Lg gr Z XS gp = ee he 3 Yj LH A S y Y yyy q s yy BEA iS Uj Wf Wi 7 Yj : S Yj YY y ge iy Yj j E 2) WY Uy LW pj G thy ; 3 Y My gy ye ge ty y CMY 4 TD eG TB i fyay' dod dt atv alban RAC) 70) ¢ tel EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE XVIII. DENDROGRAPTUS? (CALLOGRAPTUS ?) DIFFUSUS, page 132. Fig. 1. A portion of a broken frond from near the base. The test is removed in some parts, showing celluliferous markings. 2. A fragment of another specimen with similar cell-markings. “ 3. An enlargement, showing the cell-apertures. The specimens are extremely compressed. CALLOGRAPTUS ELEGANS, page 134. Fig. 4. A fragment which is more lax and spreading, with shorter branchlets than the ordinary specimens, but having similar strie, and a similar arrange- ment of cellules. DENDROGRAPTUS GRACILIS, page 132. Fig. 5. Two of the larger branches with their sub-divisions, of the natural size. ‘ 6. An enlargement from one of the branchlets, showing the striate surface and the deep indentation of the cellules. Lecade 2. Lower Siluriare. Ui Why, Ys WY YO Ah YY yy Yi WY y YY, Wy Wy; WY Wy 4 Y Vi Wy YY y Ly yf Uy ax Wii, iy Geologiral Survep of Canada. Sir W. E.. Logan, Director Graptolitidae. HL Yi) UD Y 5 - Vil omer 4 i GE Uy Uy jf Vi Ly A Ds Lif) Yi yj Uy) ANTE 4A TANI iy \) yy ON yj Ys Y Wy y Vy Y iy j Uy yey My) Uy yy Wh, Wi yy, 7 WY "Yi Lo BLP Whaitfiele. Del’ i Jamss Hall, Desexp™ James Dinthie meet An hi a Os oY Lex ra Le Ay Onn Pha ihe hae a i * EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE XIX. CALLOGRAPTUS ELEGANS, page 134. Fig. 1. A fragment of a frond, natural size. «2. A nearly entire fiabelliform frond. The two shaded lines running nearly ver- tically through the figure, are due to faults or slips in the slate, causing a slight overlapping of the laminugw, and an interruption of the continuity of the frond. “ 3. An enlargement, showing the lateral connection of the branches at irregular intervals. “ 4, A further enlargement of the non-celluliferous side of a bifurcating branchlet, showing the striated surface and a semi-articulate structure. CaLLograptus SALTERI, page 135. Figs. 5, 6. Fragments of two distinct fronds; one showing the celluliferous side, and the other the non-celluliferous side. “ 4, An enlargement from the non-celluliferous side, showing a few transverse dis- sepiments at irregular intervals. The figure has the same degree of enlargement as fig. 3 of C. elegans. “ 8. A farther enlargement of a bifurcating branchlet, showing the cell-apertures. Orclogterl Sure of Canade. sir WV Logan X ts - fe Hi A | Hl 3) ; | I 4 MG A i 1419144 } 4G Vy i 4 Ht iff Hh Mae ; Wat: Vy \ Myf { We Wijy 7p} ai Wj Lj, i y Yt Hy, aly Wy CMU Ms Ys Y Y YY hi Wy Yj Yyf j Yi Uy MY James Duthie, Se GP. Whithelddel® “eevee tal EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE XxX. DICTYONEMA IRREGULARIS, page 136. Fig. 1. A fragment from near the base of a frond. “ 2. A fragment from the outer portion of the frond. DICTYONEMA ROBUSTA, page 137. Figs. 3, 4. Fragments of two different fronds. In some parts of the specimen fig. 3, and in all of fig. 4, the branches are extremely flattened and attenuate. DICTYONEMA QUADRANGULARIS, page 138. Fig. 5. A fragment of a frond, of the natural size. DicryonemA Murrayi, page 138. Figs. 6, 7. Fragments of two fronds ; the figures of the natural size. al. qa al ot Siew pica a4) y (oewlon i Flate ZO. Quebec Group. cy i a= oO my j= he Palas =a = irs! Sie ye r= oe od Ser S| oO = Nad oe = mal [x] c5 = = ae ya r & Ny OR ae SOS gy 1) % r ve LOWwer \\ SaaS SSE SS NY NS Se NS OO SSS WN SONY OHS SS Wy NS WS iw SS) Lars SSNS Was gy 8! $ wus SG -. \\ ~\ \ EC SK SS SS se . x BS or ne Sos SS WN artes! SWANS gine eo ace A Oe ex SS SO SS SE at 1 IW VE SS, GY/agg SS PN SL Siig gg 6 OSS GON 1S AWN So eo AD A DW QP OF 2 ah Qa EE a ae z SS 2 beet Fe WV GF ggg CF 0 eee AY WS ~ WW sss wy 1S W GY Si Y t says 3 a \.4 a iS A 15 : & Janes Hall,De serpt EXPLANATIONS OF PLATE XXI. PTILOGRAPTUS PLUMOSUS, page 140. Fig. 1. A fragment which is three times branched. (73 66 cc Fig. Fig. 2 9. € Ge A slender simple branch. 3. An enlargement from the specimen fig. 1. 4. A further enlargement of a portion of the same; some of the branches showing markings like cell-apertures. PTILOGRAPTUS GEINITZIANUS, page 140. A branching fragment showing the celluliferous side. . A fragment which is irregularly branched, showing the non-celluliferous side. . A single branchlet of the same species. . An enlargement from fig. 5, showing the cell-apertures. THAMNOGRAPTUS ANNA, page 141. A fragment of the species, of the natural size. Geologtaxl Surven ot Canada, ‘Ball rp W, ial i Lo ike! TL, 1 JPector. CGraptolitid ey KW R.P. Whitfisld,Delt James Duthie, Se.