pith 4) eaten waralea EN pate no wink 41» Neate aa) mya bait H due Warne aot MA il ayes ft at i ee IAsatin gh ' Bria on euttet Cea DE ited Uae WTatanah eos a ait ne Ns A cine Hat Nid Ra asia CARES ER nia - 1s i ith ia \ sth Hntirgs vigaieatin Rae Hie daiadticta 8 iting ia vi mii tin Naat . i Ki I aM ish ! sins i on Hs ‘ an a aS Thiet ih it 18 ea ai nat tc it ye rt nile it sing Wit fq ah vi edie Wy Vel DUA a get ae ie et “4 Putte (My ii fh ; Vat a} te as wh ie hy ia “ing : ne et i 14 i is i ; my nh = te ) coe rig aed (hh hain) at font ya a ne Y i ca a Cay i j fat ny Hits 4 — "ah san pith ie 0 AW Mast cuit ie ih aaa cea = o | e in yiae i ve i oi f he tt i 4 Ne eae oi “ Oh DEBACLE Me Ht iehdy! : iH int Ss Sots Ceres tes renee Sanat Ae, es ae rt Maye eet = oh ie rete ce 7 Nae aoe a oy aN ; sane wet iaiy 7 fs Be pea f Satins ac 1s ; : vant peat eed eres 8 a ee ae ue a tM va 1 whet; ie a rotons pie Hts Gat) We haagtl a Wary ty iat ie ui ty * berate iit + ial K f it, rts a iat hy i E re Gt pi “ rth : Y ny iss SiG Miter en ha i *y Paton 4 nah vi We i iat : , v4 co oe eat sari , > “ it a “ bytes ‘ EARL he ie Ms Me Heiss oe ives dere wt il fone anti a ait ate ot p ah cee aint sits AA! uit if sate i Miertaa ; ih tau hsyyety mats Panis H #9) A 1 i f at sta aqattale y it vie 5 bie it ty it merry ies he PAE sea y arty bs sys He i Be ( Bet Hy vy ‘ iu f Aa i af 5 % i} J, + > 5 —' < uae THE FISHES — OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND. BY Pie NCIS DAY Hn. S,,, & Ais. KNIGHT OF THE CROWN OF ITALY, HON. MEMBER DEUTSCHER FISCHEREI-VEREIN, AND OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY, MEMBER OF THE ASIATIC SOCIETY OF CALCUTTA AND OF THE COTSWOLD NATURALISTS’ FIELD CLUB, ETC., DEPUTY SURGEON- GENERAL MADRAS ARMY, (RETIRED, ) AND FORMERLY INSPECTOR- GENERAL OF FISHERIES IN INDIA, IN TWO VOLUMES. VOLUME i. \401 Fe) i re © : WILHIAMS AND NORGATHE, 14, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN, LONDON ; and 20, SOUTH FREDERICK STREET, EDINBURGH. 1880—1884. LONDON: G. NORMAN AND SON, PRINTERS, HART STREET, COVENT GARDEN. FISHES OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND. B. Anacanthini Pleuronectoidei. The structure of the head is apparently unsymmetrical on the two sides. Famity, [VY—PLEURONECTIDA, Risso. Heterosomata, Bonaparte. Diprosopa, Latreille. Branchiostegals six to eight: pseudobranchie well developed. Gills four. Body strongly compressed, flattened, with one of its sides coloured, the other being colourless or having merely some spots. Both eyes (except in the very young’) situated on the upper or coloured surface, sometimes they are rudimentary. The two sides of the head not equally developed, one remaining almost rudimentary. The jaws and dentition may be nearly equally developed on both sides, or more so on the blind than in the coloured. A single, long, dorsal and anal fin. Pectorals when present may berudimentary. Scales present or absent. Lateral-line on the coloured side single, double, or triple: curved or straight. Air-bladder absent. The members composing this family are commonly known as /flat-fishes, but it must be observed there are two groups of “ flat-fishes.”” The one being as it were flattened from above, as we see in rays and skates, wherein the upper surface is the back. It is not so however among the Pleuronectide or “side swimmers,” which are flattened from side to side, except the head, which appears distorted and likewise flattened. When referring to the pleuronectoids the terms right (devtral) or left (sinistral) are employed with reference to the position of the upper or coloured side: to ascertain this the fish is placed with its tail towards the observer, the dorsal fin above and the anal beneath. Reversed examples are such as have the eyes situated on the side of the body opposite to the one in which it is generally seen. Double examples are those in which both sides of the body are coloured. Adams remarked (Voyage of the Samarang) that such as frequent coral reefs often have their tails ornamented with rather vivid colours, and their upper sides marked with somewhat striking patterns; whereas those that are half buried are as dull and dingy as the surface is where they are found. They are evidently aware how efficacious their colours prove for the purpose of concealment, and when pursued sink down to the bottom, where they lie quite still on the ground, the colour of which assimilates to that of their own upper surface. The Pleuronectoids, or flat-fishes, are among the most remarkable of vertebrate animals, as for about a week or more after birth they swim on edge in a way similar to other fishes, having their dorsal fin above, their anal fin below them, _ and possessing an eye on either side of the head. But as they grow older this erect position becomes lost, their sides become their upper and lower surfaces, while both eyes are on the superior or coloured side of the body. The adult, when at rest or swimming, usually keeps near the bottom of the water, and progresses by means of a sort of undulating motion of the whole body, and of the unpaired fins. These fish are of a broad, flat shape, and margined in almost IL. I 2 ANACANTHINI. their entire extent by the dorsal, caudal, and anal fins; while not only the muscles, but the skin, the gills, gill-covers, and even the pectoral fin-rays are less developed on the blind (or normally under surface) than on the coloured side, the mouth also being, as it were, bent round to this eyeless side, towards which the anterior part of the face seems to be twisted. From a very early age it had been known that these fishes when first emerging from the ova, and while in a pellucid condition, have an eye on either side of the head; that by degrees the eye, on what eventually will be the eyeless side, becomes depressed, while at the same time a dark spot appears on the opposite side of the head, so that the fish almost seems to possess three eyes. By degrees this dark spot becomes a distinct eye, while that on the other side gradually disappears ; in short, the eye apparently migrates from what is henceforth known as the blind side of the fish. Van Beneden (1853) and many others, considered that this abnormal position of the eyes in adult flat-fishes was due to a greater or less torsion of the entire head on the axis of the body, or else to a twisting of the face alone. Ten years subsequently (1863) Professor Steenstrup, having obtained examples of young flounders, demurred to this explanation. He observed that if such were effected by simple torsion, the nerves and muscles belonging to the upper eye must necessarily pass over the frontal bone of the blind side, and permanently continue in that position, which, however, is not found to be the case, they being at the bottom of the orbit ; and_he considered that the eye must have first passed under the frontal bones, and subsequently upwards and through them. The eye, when leaving its original site, attempts to carry the frontal bone of its own side with it, but the greater portion of that bone resists, remaining in its place. Professor Steenstrup consequently came to the conclusion that the eye on the blind side undertakes a movement deeper and deeper, passing under the half roof formed by the frontal bone of its own side, and is thus brought up through its vault; so that in order to find room for itself, it partially separates one frontal bone from its fellow, and partly makes its way through the substance of the frontal bone itself; in short, that the eye, in attaining its final position, first passes obliquely inwards, and then ascends upwards through the head, emerging on the opposite side. Professor Wyville Thompson* considered that the eye of the blind side passes to the coloured or eyed-side of the body, not through the vault of the head, but under the integument, displacing in its progress the frontal bone of its own side; that the space through which the nervous and vascular connections pass is indicated in the mature skull by the unsymmetrical posterior half of the articulating process of the prefrontal of the blind side, the eye having maintained its normal relation to its associated bone, the frontal, of the coloured side throughout. The eye changes but little in actual position with the growth of the fish, the associated parts being, as it were, developed past it and thus producing this singular obliquity. Traquair (Trans. Linn. Soe. 1866, xxv, p. 263) believed that here we hada real case of asymmetry in the supposed absence of the additional processes of the os frontis anterius and proprium. But Hr. Malm+ considered this conclusion to be erroneous, and he observed that the young flat-fish is obliged, owing to the depth of its body, increased by the development of its vertical fins, to remain on one side while resting on the ground, the horizontal fins not being sufficiently developed to sustain it ina vertical position. The eye of the “blind” side has a tendency to turn towards the light, and in doing so carries with it the cartilaginous framework of the skull, which eventually is only apparently asymmetrical. He gives excellent figures of the first stages of these fishes. Professor Alexander Agassiz remarked§ that the first change and the process is identical, whether we take a right or a left flounder. First there is a slight advance towards the snout of the eye about to be tranferred : so that the transverse axis, passing through the pupil of the eyes, no longer makes a right angle with the longitudinal axis. This movement of translation is soon followed by a slight movement of rotation, so * Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. 1865, p. 361. + Svensk. Vet. Akad. Handl. vii, no. 4, 1868. { See also Gervais, Arch. Zool. Exp. 1877, p. 193, t. vi, and Lacaze-Duthiers, l.c. p. 305. § A, Agassiz, Proz. Amer. Acad, Arts and Sciences, xiv, 1879, pl. vii-x. PLEURONECTIDA. 3 that when the young fish is seen in profile, the eyes of the two sides no longer appear in the same place, that on the blind side being now slightly above and in advance of that on the coloured side. With increasing age the eye on the blind side rises higher and higher towards the median longitudinal line of the head. The dorsal fin gradually extends towards the nostrils, and finds its way behind the eye which has come from the blind side. The eye is transferred at such an early period that the bones of the skull are cartilaginous, and the transfer is carried out by a combined process of translation and rotation. In some cases it was observed to be transferred, as described by Malm, round the head by the snout, and in others to actually pass through the soft tissues of the head, and this divergence appeared to be due solely to the generic differences in the position of the dorsal fin. Some flat-fishes have the eyes normally on the right side of the body, others on the left, but reversed instances, or those in which the coloured side is on that which is as a rule uncoloured, are not uncommon among most genera of Pleuronectoids. Such is very frequently observed in flounders, these fishes, living close in shore, being more exposed to the actions of currents than those genera which live in the deep sea. In this way they become in their very early life forced on to the side which is not the normal one. Such variations are more commonly perceived in some localities than in others, and will generally be found due to local disturbing causes. Professor Agassiz kept young flounders in glass vases, raised high above the table, and found that, notwithstanding the fact that here no disturbance could occur, seven out of fifteen were noticed endeavouring to force the eye round the wrong way, by lying down on the opposite side. But all the seven soon died,and this may account for the comparative scarcity of reversed flat- fishes. He also observed that the presence of light on all sides failed to arrest, or even to delay, the transfer of the eye, and the consequent change in the colour of the under side, which invariably became white with advancing age, when that organ passed over to the upper surface. Thus it would appear that the absence of light is not the primary or sole cause of the want of colour on the under side of the flat-fishes. While the eye is progressing from the one side of the head to the opposite where it is to find its final resting place, its course is occasionally arrested, and it may remain permanently stationary on the upper surface of the head, and this is commonly seen in what is known as “‘ double flat-fishes,”* or those coloured on both sides.t Donovan obtained a young double turbot, and thinking he had discovered an unknown fish, termed it Plewronectes cyclops, and which he figured on plate xc. “So singularly different,” says that author, “is this from the rest of the Pleuronectes that it seems to militate even against the character of the genus, which requires that both eyes should be placed on one side. We were almost tempted, from this consideration, to constitute a new genus for this curious fish.” Yarrell remarks, ‘‘ The Pleuronectes cyclops of Mr. Donovan, I believe to be an example of the young fry of the turbot, the head of which is not perfectly formed.” Double fishes have been observed in flounders, turbot, plaice, soles, etc., and they are seen to swim vertically, and to be more frequently found near the surface of the water than those which progress in a normal manner. All who have eaten these double flat-fishes know how they are most deservedly held in greater estima- tion for the table than others which have an uncoloured as well as a coloured side. Then there are albinos or those which are uncoloured or nearly white on both sides (being almost or quite double albinos) and still retaining their normal form ; but in some that have been carefully examined no sexual parts could be detected. * These would appear to be examples in which the ancestral form has been more strongly developed than has the adopted. The early lives of these fishes afford excellent illustrations of these two distinct phenomena, or of ancestral or inherited form and adopted modification. For in the earlier stages of their existence after leaving the ég¢, they swim on edge with an eye on either side of the head as in other fishes; but in a definite period they assume their adopted form of both eyes being on the same side. No matter through how many countless generations these pleuronectoids may pass, still the embryonic or early fry condition, or an eye on either side of the head, will continue to be apparent, just as the visceral clefts in the human embryo are. 7 In many double flat-fishes the eyes are in their normal position. 1* 4 ANACANTHINI. In the majority of albino examples only patches or portions of the body are thus affected, and it has been suggested whether such may not occasionally be due to a cross having occurred between a normal and a reversed example of the same species giving rise to a sort of piebald colour. Among these fishes it appears as if the female sex largely preponderated over that of the male. It also seems probable that their eggs float when deposited in the sea (see page 27). In the earlier stages of their existence during the spring months, pleuronectoids pass their lives close in shore; they swim on the surface and appear more active if the wind is setting in shore, perhaps taking advantage of it to return towards home. Many legends doubtless are in existence throughout the universe regarding how these fishes became coloured on one side only. Klunzinger tells us that in Upper Egypt a tradition is prevalent that Moses was once cooking a fish, but by the time it had been broiled until it was brown on one side, the fire or the oil gave out. Moses, in a temper the reverse of amiable, threw the fish into the sea, where, although half broiled, it came to life again, and its descendants have up to the present day preserved the same peculiar appearance, being white or colourless on one side and coloured on the other. In Constantinople a similar story is told of these fishes, but Moses retires in favour of the Sultan, Mohammed II, the conqueror of Stamboul. In the Isle of Man, Patterson states that there is a legend accounting for how the mouths of flat-fishes became twisted ; the finny tribes bethought them- selves that it was time to select a king to decide disputes, and for which purpose they all assembled, putting on their best appearance. The plaice, however, remained so long at home adorning himself with red spots in order to be selected their chief, that he did not arrive until all was over and the shad had been elected ‘‘ king of the sea.” On hearing the result, the indignation of the plaice was aroused, and curling his mouth to one side, he remarked with disdain, “ Fancy a simple fish like a herring being king of the sea.” And his mouth has continued awry ever since.* In some of the genera forming this family it is very interesting to observe the different plans on which the eyes are modified and protected. Thus, the plaice or the flounder are able to move these organs horizontally, or even vertically, and it appears as if the two eyes, to a certain extent, act independently one of the other. In the turbot this organ can be covered, for not only does a thick skin invest the upper and lateral portions of the globe, as in most of the pleuronectide, but being insufficient to protect the eye from the irritation of the sand wherewith it covers itself, it is able to elevate a thick lower eyelid, or else to depress the transparent portion of the globe of the eye beneath this fold of skin. Respecting the means of capturing these fishes, it is found that they mostly reside in localities where the beam-trawl can be employed; while due to their great commercial value for food they are sought for throughout the year. It was observed at Great Grimsby, during the cold winter of 1881, that the catch of soles had increased, as then they retired into deep water. By an old law of the Cinque Ports, no one might capture soles between the Ist of November and thé 15th of March: neither was any one permitted to fish from sun-setting to sun-rising, that the fish might enjoy their night’s food (Pennant, 1776). Constant complaints are heard respecting the diminution in the quantity of flat-fishes and the undersized ones that are sent to market. Thus, in Land and Water of September 17th, 1881, Mr. Epton remarks on this as a fisherman and what he has observed during the last few years off Great Grimsby. Now these fish have decreased so that the captures by each fishing smack are much less than formerly, but the supply has been kept up by increasing the number of vessels. It has been suggested that beam trawlers ought not to fish in water of less depth than twelve fathoms, or they would be injuring the brood-grounds. Once captured in a trawl, there would be but little use in returning the small fish to the sea, as they are usually too much injured. * The muscles of these fishes are more developed on the coloured than on the blind side of the body, PLEURONECTIDA. 4) Dr. Sauvage has remarked that the various degrees of development of the termination of the vertebral column in the genera éhombus, Solea, and Plewronectes are in accordance with their geological appearance (Compt. Rend., April, 1872), while, geologically speaking, they are a modern family of fishes, having been found in a fossil state in the early Tertiary deposits (Rhombus solea), but no remains of allied forms occur associated with those of the bony fishes of the Cretaceous and Jurassic rocks. Geographical distribution.—These littoral forms are mostly found where the sea possesses a sandy bottom, or else in muddy or sandy rivers, rarely existing at great depths, and but seldom frequenting rocky or precipitous coasts; while due to the deficiency of an air-bladder they live at the bottom. Pleuronectoids are most numerous towards the tropics, where, however, they do not attain to so large a size as those which reside in temperate or cold regions; they are absent from very high latitudes. Some, as the common flounder, are anadromous forms, but the majority are strictly marine; while a few of the marine species have naturally, or consequent upon experiments made by man, been acclimatized in fresh water. Synopsis of Genera. A. Jaws and dentition about equally developed on both sides. 1. Hippoglossus.—Kyes on the right side. Teeth in the upper jaw in two rows. The dorsal fin commences above the upper eye. Scales cycloid. 2. Hippoglossoides.—Hyes on the right side. Teeth small and in a single row. The dorsal fin commences above the upper eye. Scales ctenoid. 3. Ihombus.—Hyes on the left side. Teeth in a band in both jaws and present on the vomer. 4. Zeugopterus.—Hyes on the left side. Teeth in a band. The dorsal fin commences before the eyes. Scales ctenoid or spinate. 5. Arnoglossus.—Hyes on the left side. Teeth in one or two rows in the jaws. Dorsal fin commences on the snout. Scales deciduous. B. Jaws and dentition most developed on the blind side. 6. Plewronectes—Hyes on the right side. Teeth of moderate size. The dorsal fin commences above the upper eye. Both pectorals present. 7. Solea.—EHyes on the right side. Teeth small, only on the blind side. The dorsal fin commences before the upper eye and is not confluent with the caudal. Pectorals may be well developed, rudimentary, or absent. Scales ctenoid. Genus I—Hiproatossus, Owvier. Platysomatichthys, Bleeker (lateral-line having a curved anterior portion). Branchiostegals seven: pseudobranchice present. Hyes on the right side. Cleft of mouth deep. Gill-rakers few, compressed and short. Teeth in the upper jaw in two rows, the outer of which 1s composed of conical ones : those in the lower jaw conical and widely set: none on vomer, palatines or tongue. Dorsal fin conmences above the orbit: caudal free: dorsal and anal fin rays (except the last few) unbranched. Scales small, cycloid and not extended on to the vertical fins. Lateral-line straight or with a curve in its anterior portion. Habitat.—North Atlantic to the south coast of England, and stragglers off France: and on the American coast from Newfoundland to Cape Hatteras. In the North Pacific it has been taken from Kamtskatka to California. These fishes are mostly captured off banks at some distance from the coast, and at depths up to 150 fathoms. They attain to a large size. Storer records an American example which weighed 3 ewt. 1. Hippoglossus vulgaris, Plate XCIV. Hippoglossus, Rondel. xi, c. 16, p. 325; Willughby, p. 99, t. F6; Ray, Syn. p- 33; Gesner, pp. 669, 787; Aldrov. ii, ¢ 43, p. 238. Pusserwm genus majus, 6 ANACANTHINI. Schoney. p. 62. Plewronectes, sp. Artedi, Synon. p. 31, no. 3, and Gen. p. 17, no. 3; Gronov. Zooph. no. 247. Passer, sp. Klein, Pisce. Miss. iv, p. 33, no. 2. Helleflynder, Pontop. Norg. Nat. Hist. ii, p. 220; Strém. Séndm. 1, p. 300. Hippoglossus Rondeletii, Rutty, Co. Dublin, 1772, i, p. 350. Holibut, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (ed. 1776) i, p. 226 (ed. 1812) ii, p. 302. Fletan, Duhamel, Péches, i, sect. ix, p. 271, pl. vu, f.1. The Holibut, Low, Fauna Orcad. p. 211. Pleuronectes hippoglossus, Linn. Syst. Nat. i, p. 456; Bloch, t. xlvii; BI. Schn. p. 147; Gmel. Linn. p. 1227; Lacép. iv, p. 601; Bonnaterre, Ency. Ich. p. 74, pl. xxxix, f. 156; Donovan, Brit. Fish. iv, pl. Ixxv; Shaw, Zool. iv, p- 295; Pallas, Zoogr. Roos. As. i, p. 421; Turton, Brit. Fauna, p. 95; Faber, Fische Isl. p. 148; Gronoy. ed Gray, p. 87; Schlegel, Dieren Neder. p. 173, pla xy, ts ele Hippoglossus vulgaris, Flem. Brit. An. p. 199; Jenyns, Man. p. 460; Yarrell, Brit. (ish. (Hd. 1) u, p. 230; (ce. fig. (Ed. 2) an pa32l Cid. 73) apedalr Parnell, Wern. Mem. vu, p. 372 and Fish. Firth of Forth, p. 212; Templeton, Mag. Nat. Hist. 1837 (2) 1, p. 411; Johnston, Berwick. Nat. Hist. Club, 1838, i, p. 174; De Kay, New York Fauna, Fish. p. 294, pl. xlix, f. 157; White, Catal. p- 101; Thompson, Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p. 199; Giinther, Catal. iv, p. 403; Malgr. Gify. Sven. Vet. Akad. Foérh. 1865, p. 527; Gilpin, Proc. and Trans. Nov. Scot. Inst. Nat. Sci. 11, 2, 1869, p. 20; Collett, Norges Fiske, p. 134; McIntosh, Fish. St. Andrew’s, p. 179; Winther, Ich. Dan. Mar. p. 36; Moreau, Poiss. France, i, p. 287 (? Ayres, Proc. Cal. Acad. 1859, p. 30). Hippoglossus maximus, Gottsche, Wiegm. Arch. 1835, p. 164; Kroyer, Dan. Fisk. i, p. 381, c. fig.; Nilsson, Skan. Fauna, iv, p. 631. Hippoglossus gigas, Swainson, Fishes, 1, p. 302; Bonap. Pesc. Hur. 47. Hippoglossus Linnet, Malm, ‘p. 508." Holibut, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, iii, p. 149, pl. clix. B. vii, D. 99-107, P. 14-18, V. 6, A. 73-82, C. 15-18, Coc. pyl. 4, Vert. 16/34. Length of head 43, of caudal fin 61, height of body 3 to 3; in the total length. Hye—diameter 53 to 6 in the length of the head and nearly or quite equals the extent of the snout, and from 3 to 1 diameter apart; anteriorly the two eyes reach to the same level ; interorbital space smooth, scaleless. The greatest height of the head does not quite equal itslength. Lower jaw prominent ; the posterior extremity of the maxilla reaches to beneath the middle or hind edge of the orbit; the length of the maxilla equals about 1/3 of that of the head. Teeth—conical, in the anterior two-thirds of the upper jaw in two rows, the outer consisting of distantly separated and large ones: posteriorly a single row; in the lower jaw six to eight distantly placed conical ones; none on the palate or tongue. ims—the dorsal commences above the first third or middle of the upper orbit, and terminates before it reaches the caudal fin, the length of the interspace being equal to the depth of the free portion of the tail; all the rays are simple and unbranched except the last few ; the highest rays are about its centre where they equal about one-third that of the body beneath them, the anteriorand posterior rays are short. Pectoral on the coloured side half as long as the head, slightly shorter on the blind side; Ventral short, being scarcely half the length of the pectoral, while it does not quite reach to above the commencement of the anal, which latter fin is low at first but at about the end of its first third the rays become so long as to be equal to at least 1/3 of that of the body above it, the fin terminates beneath the end of the dorsal, its last few rays bifurcated. Caudal emarginate. Scales—minute, and cycloid over the body and head on the coloured side and some on the end of the maxilla, none between the rays of the dorsal and anal fins. Blind side of body scaled. No spine in front of the anal fin. Lateral-line—anteriorly curved above the pectoral fin, the height of the curve being about equal to one-fourth of its length. (iull-rakers— compressed, wide but short, the length of each not being equal to half that of the orbit. Colowrs—right or coloured side of an olive marbled all over with darker: fins similarly coloured except in the young, when the basal halves of the dorsal and anal are light coloured. Naines.—Said by Ray (1713) to have been termed but, also turbut or turbot. PLEURONECTIDA. 7 Lady fluke. Turbot, Moray Firth, also bradan leathan or “flat salmon,” while at Aberdeen the large ones are called turbot, very old and black ones blacksmiths, and young ones birdies (Sim). Also known as workhouse turbot. De Heilbot, Dutch. Le Flétan, French. Habits.—This is the largest form of the family taken off the British shores. It feeds close to the ground, but often inhabits deep and rocky situations, while Liacépéde observed that in Greenland it appeared to prefer localities also frequented by the cod, as they probably seek the same food. Pennant remarked (1776) that during the preceding year there had been two instances of holibuts swallowing the lead weight at the end of lines with which seamen were sounding, one occurring off Flamborough Head, the other when going into Tinmouth Haven. Thompson took from the stomach of one weighing about 1201b. the remains of a ray: from another ten full grown sprats and a fragment of Millepora polymorpha: another was crammed with crabs and a valve of Venus cassina. On the Dogger bank it is said to consume large quantities of shell fish, also flat-fish and crustacea. Means of capture-—Baits employed on very strong hooks and lines, as it sometimes offers a most determined resistance when hooked, and which may be very formidable in large examples. This, according to Thompson, is not in accordance with the experience of Irish fishermen, who assert that it isa simple fish, easily killed, and they never lose one in consequence of its weight. .Off Treland it is said to be generally taken on cod-lines, the Buccinwm undatum being mostly employed as a bait. In the Orkneys they are most commonly captured in the slack water and eddies’ occasioned by the various islands in the race of the tides. Baits.—Generally those employed for the cod and turbot. In the Moray Firth a piece of plaice is mostly used. Breeding.—April in Cornwall (R. Couch): off Scotland in the spring (Parnell). The roe is of a pale red colour, and the ova very numerous (Buckland). Diseases.—Thompson states that upon all he has examined were specimens of the parasite Hirudo hippoglossus, Miller; and McIntosh remarks that Hpibdella hippoglosst is often seen on the caligus of this fish, in fact Udonella caligorum is common. Uses.—Said to be more famed for its size than for its quality, and i is sold throughout the year except during May and June. As food.—lIt is little esteemed in England and does not obtain a ready sale among the general public, unless other fish is scarce; Mr. Rowell, however, observes (Land and Water, July 16th, 1881), that at Newcastle they are termed “turbot ” and greatly esteemed, and as a test observes cod is retailed at 4d a lb. ling at 5d or 6d and halibut at 10d or 1s, these three prices showing their respective local estimation. He continues: ‘‘ Let any one get a piece of halibut from a small one, season it with nutmeg, pepper, and salt, and bake it in the oven, and I know nothing so fine—no fish, turbot, sole, or salmon, can excel it; it does not do to boil, it is too soft, I think, and it is too thick to fry, and it does not do to slice it, but cut a piece of three or four pounds or more, and bake it, it makes a most delicious fish dinner.” In Cheltenham and elsewhere, Jews are frequent purchasers of halibut, but they must have an entire fish with its head and gills intact. Thompson considered it very good for the table: Low asserted that it is a large, coarse and dry fish, except the head and fins which are reckoned excellent, while a small one is far from bad. The skin is thick and oily, as also the bones, from which latter a quantity of pure oil may be obtained. The Greenlanders are said to cut them into large strips which are dried in the sun. Habitat—From the coasts of Spitzbergen to Iceland, Finland and Scandinavia to the British and French shores, but it is rare in the Channel. One was taken in 1874 at Biarritz, and likewise at Boulogne (Moreau). It is abundant off the Orkneys, especially in eddies-or where two tides meet, one captured in such a locality was 75 feet long and thick in proportion ; it is also common in Zetland (Baikie). Frequently met with along the east coast of Scotland (Parnell) : and 8 ANACANTHINI. thrives on the immense sandy plain between there and Norway (Buckland). Reid has obtained it up to 231 lb. weight at Wick : also found in the Moray Firth, more particularly during the month of March: at Banff in deep water (Hdward) : Aberdeen (Sim): not rare at St. Andrew’s (McIntosh). Resident off the Yorkshire coast and in moderate numbers, but seldom caught now at Flamborough where thirty or forty years ago it was very numerous (Yorkshire Vertebrata). In the Norwich papers of February 15th, 1873, one is mentioned as having been taken off Yarmouth, measuring 53 feet long, 23 broad, and weighing 74 stone, and Buckland, another, 6 feet long, weighing 161 lb. obtained from the same locality in 1867. In the Norfolk Chronicle of April 29th, 1876, it is recorded that Messrs. Parker exhibited a halibut from the deep sea off the eastern counties weighing over 300 lb. and above seven feet in length. It has been captured off Sussex (Merrifield) : it is occasionally taken off Devonshire but not sought after (Parfitt) : on April 14th, 1870, one weighing 102 lb. was secured at Mevagissey : it is not common off Cornwall, and has been taken up to 122 Ib. off Land’s End, and one weighing about a cwt. is recorded by Mr. Cornish in the Zoologist, as captured on a spiller in Mount’s Bay on May 15th, 1882. Pennant mentions it from the Menai Straits,and in April, 1829, an example 73 feet long and 320 Ib. weight was recorded from off the Isle of Man (Mag. Nat. Hist. 1829, i, p. 84) and is, perhaps, the example stated by Parnell to have sent to the Edinburgh market (1828). In Treland.—It is taken occasionally on all parts of the coast from December until March. In Portrush, county of Antrim, it is occasionally captured in winter on the cod-lines, baited either with Buccinum wndatwm or the flesh of various fishes, chiefly Labride (Zool. 1876, p. 4754). The example figured is 26 inches in length and came from the North Sea. It attains to at least 500 lb. weight in Europe. Olasson mentioned one exceeding this from Iceland, and which was said to have been little short of 20 feet in length : while Couch was informed of a still larger example captured on the banks of Newfoundland. PLEURONECTID&. 9 Genus II—Htprocnossorwes, Gottsche. Branchiostegals eight : pseudobranchic present. Hyes on the right side. Cleft of mouth deep. Pointed teeth in a single row in the jaws, none on the palate. The dorsal fin commences above the wpper eye, its rays, as well as those of the anal, unbranched. Scales small and ctenoid, a row along each dorsal and anal ray. Lateral-line without any curve anteriorly. Geographical distribution.—Coasts of the northern seas of Europe, extending to and around the British Isles. Also found on the Atlantic shores of America. 1. Hippoglossoides limandoides, Plate XCV. Pleuronectes limandoides, Bloch. t. clxxxvi; Bl. Schn. p. 146; Gmel Linn. p- 1232; Bonn. Ency. Ich. p. 76, pl. xc, f. 374; Lacép. iv, p. 635; Shaw, Zool. iy, p. 800; Faber, Isis, 1828, p. 878; Nilss. Skan. Fauna, iv, p. 629; Schlegel, Dieren Neder. p. 171. Pleuronectes linguatula, Mill. Prod. p. 377. Hippoglossoides limanda, Gottsche, Wiegm. Arch. 1835, p. 168. Pleuronectes limandanus, Parnell, Edin. New Phil. Journal, 1835, p. 210. Platessa limandoides, Parnell, Wern. Mem. vii, p. 368, t. xxxviii, and Fish. Firth of Forth, p. 208, t. xxxviii; Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (Hd. 1) i, p. 224, c. fig. (Hd. 2) u, p. 312 (Hd. 3) i. p. 625; Jenyns, Man. p. 459; Johnston, Berw. Nat. Field Club, 1838, i, p. 174; Fries och Hks. Skand. Fisk. p. 117, pl. xxvii; Kroyer, Dan. Fiske, ui, p. 358, c. fig.; White, Catal. p. 101. Hippoglossoides imandoides, Giinther, Catal. iv, p. 405; Collett, Norges Fiske, p- 186; Malm, p. 509; Winther, Ich. Dan. Mar. p. 37. Pleuronectes limandoides, Malmg. Wieg. Arch. 1864, p. 293. Long rough dab, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, ii, p. 153, plate clx. B. viii, D. 76-87, P. 10, V. 6, A. 60-69, C. 14-16, L. 1. 85-95, Cove. pyl. 4, Vert. 45. Length of head 43 to 5, of caudal fin 6, height of body 3 to 3; in the total length. Hyes—divided by a narrow but scaled ridge, diameter about 1/4 of the length of the head and nearly 1 diameter from the end of the snout. The anterior margin of each eye is on the same vertical line. Cleft of mouth deep, the maxilla equals nearly half the length of the head, and reaches posteriorly to beneath the middle of the orbit, the lower jaw the longer. 'eeth—pointed, the anterior being the longest, the front ones are placed somewhat distantly apart and in one row in each jaw. Gill-rakers—about 1/2 as long as the diameter of the orbit and placed somewhat distantly apart. Fins—the dorsal commences above the first third of the upper eye, but is not continued as far as the base of the caudal fin, its rays are simple, the longest being equal to about three times the height of the body below them, and are situated about midway between the hind edge of the head and the base of the caudal fin. Right pectoral nearly half the length of the head, its rays simple. Right ventral, inserted anterior to the base of the pectoral, consisting of six rays, it is two-thirds as long as the pectoral but does not extend quite to the base of the anal, which latter fin has a short spine directed forwards at its base,* just where it commences on a vertical line beneath the middle of the pectoral: it ends similarly to the dorsal: its highest rays are slightly below the centre of its length and are similar to those of the dorsal fin. Caudal wedge-shaped, its central rays being slightly the longest; they are bifurcated at their extremity. Free portion of the tail two-thirds as long as high. Scales—ctenoid covering head, including jaws and body as well as a row on each * Dr. Giinther says that in this species there is “no spine before the anal fin.” Parnell recorded its existence in the examples now in the national cullection, and I find one most distinct in my specimens, But it must not be forgotten that the British Museum specimens were only dried skins. 10 ANACANTHINI. fin ray. Lateral-line—nearly straight anteriorly, becoming quite so opposite the hind end of the pectoral fin. Cacal appendages—four. Colowrs—on upper surface of a pale brownish gray or sandy: under surface white. Occasionally it is said to be slightly spotted. - Names.—Rough dab, or long-rough dab: bastard-sattie, Aberdeen: also yellow dab, Banff :°Long-fleuk, and sandsucker, Edinburgh, the last name being due to the erroneous idea that it feeds on nothing but sand: Temon sole, Scotland. De lange schar, Dutch. Habits.—It frequents sandy shores, is captured along with plaice and other pleuronectoids, and, according to Parnell, several may be daily seen in the Edinburgh markets from May to July: Parnell found what appeared to be fragments of some species of Asterias in the stomach of one he examined. Cock’s specimen had its stomach filled with the shells of Turritella terebra, two-thirds of which contained hermit crabs, Pagurus. Means of captwre.—It appears to be usually taken with the beam trawl. Breeding.—Asserted by Couch to spawn in May and June. As food.—Its flesh is said to be sweet and ‘good, but rather dry. Habitat.—Atlantic coasts of North Europe and shores of the German Ocean : Bloch appears to have first received it from Heligoland. The first record of the occurrence of this fish in the British seas was by Parnell in 1835 (1c.): Yarrell received an example from Dr. Harwood in 1833, captured during the autumn at St. Leonard’s, and in the succeeding summer two from Berwick. It is rare off Banff (Edward): found at Aberdeen (Sim): frequent during May, June and July, in the Firth of Forth (Parnell): not rare off Berwick (Johnston): Sunderland (G. Fox): inhabits deep waters in the North Sea and is occasionally taken at Whitby (Yorkshire Vertebrata) : Hastings (Yarrell) : - rare off Devonshire according to Parfitt: I have received numerous examples from Brixham: Falmouth (Cocks). In Ireland Mr. Todhunter obtained a specimen off Cape Clear in the winter of 1848, and which is now in the Dublin University Museum. The example figured is nine inches in length and was captured at Brixham, along with several more, in the summer of 1880. The largest British specimen recorded measured fifteen inches in length. PLEURONECTID A. 11 Genus IJI—Rauomptvs, Cuvier. Scophthalmus and Bothus, Rafinesque. Psetta, Swainson. Branchiostegals seven : pseudobranchie present. Hyes on the left side. Cleft of mouth deep. Teeth in a narrow band without canines in the jaws, present on the vomer. Dorsal fin commences on the snout, most of its rays and those of the anal branched. Gill membranes but slightly united at the throat. Gill-rakers long and lanceolate. Scales, when present, small. The turbot was formerly preserved by the Romans in salt water ponds, so as to be readily available for the market. The largest appear to have been preferred, and it has been asserted that the Emperor Domitian convened the senate as to how a mighty fish of this kind should be cooked. Respecting the food of the turbot and flat-fishes generally, it is often difficult to institute investiga- tions, as they are mostly at once disembowelled by fishermen when captured, because after death decomposition rapidly attacks their intestines, and injures the fish in a very few hours. By Acti, c. 28, of George I, a turbot under 16 in. long, brill under 14, codling 12, whiting 6, bass and mullet 12, sole 8, plaice or dab 6, and flounder 7 in. long, were forbidden to be sold. Geographical distribution.—North Atlantic, German Ocean, Mediterranean, and Adriatic to the Black Sea. Synopsis of Species. 1. Rhombus maximus, D. 61-72, A. 45-56. No scales but tubercles. 2. Rhombus levis, D. 82-85, A. 60-63, scaled. 3. Ithombus megastoma, D. 85-87, A. 67-69, scaled. 1. Rhombus maximus, Plate XCVI. Tay Avis. lv, C. LU, vy, ce. 9) ix, ¢. 375 Ailian,) iv, ¢. a; Oppian, 1, p. 5: Rthombus, Pliny, ix, ce. 15, 20, 42; Belon. De Aquat. p. 139; Klein, Pisce. Miss. ly, p. 30, t. vill, f. 2. Rhombus aculeatus, Rondel. xi, c. 2, p. 310; Gesner, Aquat. iv, pp. 661, 670; Schonev. Ich. p. 60; Aldrov. ii, c. 48, p. 248; Jonston, i, c. 3, art. 2, punct. 2, p. 66, t. xxii, f. 12; Willughby, p. 93, t. F 8, f. 3; Ray, Syn. p- 32; Klein, Miss. iv, p. 34, no. 1, t. viii, f. 1 and t. ix, f.1. Rhombus maximus, Will. p. 94, t. F 2; Ray, p. 31; Rutty, Co. Dublin, i, p. 350; Pleuronectes, sp. Artedi, Syn. p. 32, no. 7, Gen. p. 18, no. 9; Gronoy. Zooph. no. 254, and Mus. 1, p- 10, no. 159. Turbot, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (ed. 1776) ui, p. 233 (ed. 1812) iii, p- 315, pl. xlix; Duhamel, Péches, iii, sect. 9, p. 261, pl. 111; Low, Fauna Orcad. p- 214. Pleuronectes maximus, Linn. Syst. Nat. i, p. 459; Briinn. Ich. Mass. p. 35 ; Bloch, t. xlix; Bl. Schn. p. 158; Gmel. Linn. p. 1236; Bonn. Ency. Ich. p. 77, pl. xlii, f. 163 ; Quensel, Vet. Akad. Handl. 1806, p. 203; Risso, Ich. Nice, p. 314; Faber, Isis, 1828, p. 892; Donovan, Brit. Fish. ii, pl. xlvi; Ekst. Vet. Akad. Handl. 1834, p. 56 and Fische Mérké, p. 250; Flem. Brit. An. p. 196; Jenyns, Man. p. 461; Templeton, Mag. Nat. Hist. 1837 (2) i, p. 411; Johnston, Berwick. Nat. Field Club, 1838, i, p. 174; Thompson, Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p. 200; Schlegel, Dieren Neder. p. 162, pl. xv, f. 2. Pleuronectes turbot, Lacép. iv, p. 645. Pleuronectes tuberculatus, Shaw, Zool. iv, p. 312, pl. xlv ; Turton, p. 97. Bothus imperialis, Raf. Caratt, p. 23. Scophthalmus maximus, Raff. Indice, p. 14. Rhombus maximus, Cuv. Régne Anim.; Risso, Eur. Merid. ii, p. 250; Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (Ed. 1) ii, p. 233, c. fig. (Hd. 2) ii, p. 324 (Ed. 3) i, p. 634; Parnell, Wern. Mem. vii, p. 373 and Fish. Firth of Forth, p. 213; Bonap. Fauna of 12 ANACANTHINI. Ital. Pesc. ; Nilsson, Skand. Fauna, iv, p. 636; Kréyer, Dan. Fiske, ii, p. 424, ¢. fig.; Costa, Fauna Nap. u, p. 15; Canestr. Arch. Zool. i, p. 25, tav. i, f. 1; Gunther, Catal. iv, p. 407; Malm, p. 510; Malmer. Wiegm. Arch. 1864, p. 293; Collett, Norges Fiske, p. 137; Steind. Ich. Span. u. Port. 1868, p. 48; Winther, Ich. Dan. Mar. p- 37; Giglioli, Pesce. Ital. p. 38; Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 338. Pleuronectes tuberculatus, Shaw, Zool. iv, p. 312; Turton, Brit. Fauna, p. 97. Pleuronectes cyclops, Donovan, iv, pl. xc; Turton, p. 97; Jenyns, Manual, p- 466 (Young). Platessa cyclops, Fleming, p. 199 (young). Rhombus aculeatus, Gottsche, Wiegm. Arch. 1835, p. 172. Psetta maxima, Swainson, Fish. 11, p. 802; Bonap. Pesce. Eur. 49; White, Catal. p. 102; McIntosh, Fish. N. Uist, P. Roy. Soc. Edin. V, 1862-66, p. 614. Pleuronectes rhombus, Gronov. ed. Gray, p. 90. Turbot, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, 11, p. 155, pl. elxi. B. vii, D. 61-72, P. 11-12, V. 6, A. 45-56, C. 15-16, Vert. 12/19, Coe. pyl. 2. Length of head 35, of caudal fin 57 to 53, height of body 1% to 2 in the total length. Hyes—diameter 1/6 to 1/10 of the length of the head, 1 transverse diameter apart, lower eye 1/2 a diameter in advance of the upper eye and 1} to 23 diameters from the end of snout. Not only does opaque and thick skin cover the upper and lateral portions of the eye, but it can raise a thick lower eyelid or else depress the transparent portion of the globe below this fold of skin, while a portion of the iris forms a semilunar veil at the upper part of the pupil. Cleft of mouth deep, oblique, lower jaw the longer, the length of the maxilla is equal to half that of the head. Yeeth—-small, numerous, and in several rows in both jaws. Fins—dorsal commences on the snout in advance of the eyes, its rays are branched, at first low they increase in length to just beyond the centre of the fin where they are about half as long as the head from thence they gradually decrease, ending a very short distance from the base of the caudal fin. Pectoral with branched rays, its length equals two-fifths of that of the head. Ventral commences under the throat, its rays simple, the longest equals two-thirds the length of the pectoral. Anal commences slightly before the base of the pectoral, its rays increase in length to _ the 18th or 20th which are nearly as high as the highest in the dorsal fin. Caudal rounded. The skin on the coloured side is studded with numerous bony tubercles, the blunt points of which are directed forwards, those on the head are smaller than those on the body. JLateral-line—with a curve anteriorly, and becoming straight opposite the posterior end of the pectoral fin. Colowrs— superiorly sandy brown covered with more or less distinct dark spots and blotches, these being likewise continued on to the fins, giving them a mottled appearance. Under surface of the body white. Varieties in form.—Examples are occasionally met with having a notch or depression at the summit of the head. McIntosh (Fish. St. Andrew’s) figures an abnormal form, and in his account of the fish of North Uist, observes upon one with an eye on either side of its head, as shown in Pleuronectes cyclops of Donovan. Couch instances a turbot coloured on both sides, in which a process 3 inches in length, thin in substance and nearly as broad as a finger, projected from before its eyes, and was not connected with the fin rays. Tn colour, varieties are numerous, there are such as are partially albinos: also reversed and double ones. On August 2nd, 1874, a double one weighing 11 Ib. was taken at Montrose, where, remarks Mr. Johnson, ‘‘ we see sometimes in the course of the year two or three of them, and then for years won’t see any.” It has been observed that these fish from our northern coasts and brought by the Dutch, are darker than those from the S.W. coast of England. Names.—Turbot, formerly spelt turbolt. Rod, Orkneys. oddan or roan fleuk, barncock (from its round shape) and gunner-fleuk, or fleuk, east coast of Scotland. Neill observes that it is termed rawn fleuk or “ fleuk in roe,” because it is deemed best for the table when in ‘“rawn” or ‘roe.’ Brat, turbrat or roddams, Northumberland. In Cornwall, according to Borlase, it used to be termed brett, in an old Cornish journal it is called luggatee. Duirt- or byrte-fish or breat PLEURONECTIDA. 13 is alluded to in all ordinances as this or allied fishes. De Tarbot, Dutch: Le Turbot, French. Habits.—Frequents sandy bays and likewise muddy localities: it appears to constantly change its residence, migrating into deep water during cold weather similarly to the soles (see page 40). It is very retentive of life when captured. Its principal food is small fish, crustaceans and molluscs. In an example taken in Torbay, which Mr. Gosden of Exeter, examined when quite fresh, he found Montagu’s crab (Xantho florida), the angled crab (Gonoplax angulata), velvet fidler crab (Portunus puber), the long-haired porcelain crab (Porcelanus longicornus), the olive squat lobster (Galathea squamifera), the spider crab (Stenorynchus phalangium), brittle starfish (Ophiostrix fragilis), and the Hurynome aspera (Land and Water, January 17th, 1880). Pontoppidan remarks that it feeds on young crabs and small fishes, sea eggs or sea urchins, of which it is very fond. Means of captwre-—At the commencement of the season, trawls, but as the fish retires to deeper water and rougher ground, long lines or boulters are employed : it is taken by trammel and beam-trawl nets. In calm weather when the sun is bright, it may be speared. In County Down they employ a spear 32 or 33 feet long armed at its extremity with an iron barb: the fishermen even drive it down on them when beyond their reach. In many places, fishing for turbot with long lines has had to be discontinued owing to their being destroyed by steam-trawlers, while in several localities these fish which used to be abundant have almost disappeared. It is to be regretted that numbers of the young of these tish are destroyed by trawlers, or inshore nets having a small mesh as used by shrimpers. Baits.—These must be very fresh, alive if practicable, and shining if possible: the lampern is deemed one of the best, and largely used by the Dutch. In the Moray Firth, during July and August, it is often taken with herrings or sand eels used asa bait. It will take a slice of fresh fish as those named, also Cottus, haddock, mackerel, pilchard, sand smelt, garfish, and likewise worms, mussels, limpets, or even bullock’s liver. . Lreeding.— Breeds in summer: in February 15th, 1882, I found a female with nearly mature ova. This fish has a large number of very small ova, and in a 23 lb. fish which had a roe weighing 5 lb. 9 oz. Buckland found 14,311,200 eggs. Hermaphrodites.—Quelch (Proc. Zool. Soc. 1862, p. 473) published a descrip- tion of a supposed hybrid between this fish and the brill, Rhombus levis. Messrs. Pile reported to Land and Water (November 28th, 1881) from Dublin having obtained a similar hybrid weighing 173 Ib. “It had the ordinary large turbot head, fins, and unusually large ‘ wings,’ but the belly, though quite white like the turbot, had large scales on it not unlike brills, the back was of a very dark colour and covered with small lumps. The fish was fully matured and in splendid condition.” Life history—The young turbot would appear to swim for a longer period “on edge” than the generality of our flat-fishes. I received from Mr. Dunn an example captured August 20th, 1880, which was about 13 inches in length and supposed to be two months old. It showed the eye still in transit passing round the bones of the head. Mr. Dunn considers they are hatched in June or July: for the first month they are quite black and swim on edge like a John Doree. Then their skin commences to mottle with white and brown, and their right eye begins to pass over to the left side of the head. Next they become white underneath, and of a light leaden colour on the upper surface, and during the period they remain of this shade on the back, which is until they have passed two months of age, they swim on the surface of the sea. If they descend to the bottom during this period it can only be occasionally. What the rate of growth of these fish is, very different opinions may be given. Some young, measuring three inches across, were obtained from shrimpers and placed in the Southport Aquarium. In two and a half years they had attained to 10 1b. each in weight, after two years more they further augmented to 20 lb. or an annual average increment of about 44 1b. each. In the Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, December, 1879, will be found the result of some observations made 14 ANACANTHINI. on these fishes in Ballinskellings Bay in Ireland, which seemed to point out that the annual increment in the sea was about | lb. yearly. Diseases.—Mr. Cornish has taken turbot cut in the belly by, presumably, one of the weevers (see T'rachinus, i, p. 78). When hooked and on the long lines, the myxine or hag will devour the turbot. Uses.—A large proportion of our turbot are taken along our east coast, on or near the various sandbanks. But the Dutch are more successful at capturing this fish than our native fishermen, and are estimated to supply one-fourth of the quantity of this fish which is consumed. Their fishing commences about the end of March, a few leagues to the south of Schevelingen. As the warm weather approaches the fishery is gradually advanced to the northwards: and the fishing terminates about the middle of August. The Dutch were computed to have realized £80,000 yearly by the sale of turbot to the Londou markets and the Danes £12,000 to £15,000 per annum for lobsters wherewith to form the sauce (see Fisheries, in Introduction). As food.—The most highly valued among flat-fishes. In L’EHstange’s House- hold Book, sixteenth century, the merits of the turbot appear to have been recognized: one is mentioned as purchased for two shillings and fourpence, while ten plaice cost but tenpence (Lubbock). Rutty, in 1772, says it used to be termed in Dublin “the pheasant of the water.” Low, in the Orkneys, that it is a much better fish than the halibut. If at all tainted it is lable to occasion nausea and sometimes severe symptoms. This fish is generally boiled for the table, and lemon juice rubbed over it is reputed to preserve its whiteness. Habitat—The coasts of the northern seas of Europe, plentiful in the German Ocean, and extending to the seas of Britain and round the coast of France, and through the Mediterranean to the Adriatic. Low observed that during seven years in the Orkneys he had seen but two or three specimens: not rare in Orkney and Zetland (Baikie): Banff (Hdward) : Aberdeen (Sim) : common at St. Andrew's (McIntosh): but large ones are rare until the English coast is approached. A considerable fishery exists along Berwickshire, Northumberland and Yorkshire (Yarrell). Resident off the coast in moderate abundance (Yorkshire Vertebrata) : rare in the Norfolk estuary (Gurney): very fine ones are taken at the back of the “Falls” near Margate (Buckland): in the vicinity of Dover, the Varna and the Ridge sandbanks, the first about seven miles distant and the latter about twelve on the French coast, also afford good fishing ground at certain seasons for these fish. A considerable amount is likewise captured off the Devonshire coast where, however, it is not so common as off Yorkshire: in Cornwall not uncommon, also captured in the Bristol Channel. In Ireland it is taken round the coast and is plentiful to the north (Templeton) : at Portrush, common (Ogilby). The example figured is fourteen inches in length, from the Yorkshire coast. As to the size it attains in this country, accounts vary, as in some places the halibut is termed a turbot. Thompson mentions one 443 lb. weight captured in a trammel in four fathoms of water at Springvale, County Down. Buckland took a cast of one which weighed 32 1b. Parnell records on hearsay, one weighing 190 lb. and Couch possessed a note of one 70 lb. in weight. 2. Rhombus levis, Plate XCVII. Rhombus levis, Rondel. xi, c. 3, p. 312; Gesner, Aquat. iv, p. 663; Aldrov. ul, c. 48, pp. 249, 250; Schoney. p. 60; Jonston, i, c. 3, art. 2, punct. 2, p. 66, t. xxii, f. 13; Willugh. p. 96; Ray, p. 32. The pearl, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (ed. 1776) i, p. 238 (ed. 1812) iii, p. 321, pl. 50. Rhombus alter Gallicus, Belon. de Aquat. p. 141. Rhombus non aculeatus, Will. p. 95, t. F1; Ray, p. 31. Plewronectes, sp. Artedi, Syn. p. 31, no. 5, and Genera, p. 18, no. 8. Plewronectes levis, LL. Westg. Res. p. 178. Rhombus, no. 3, Klein, Pisce. Miss. iv, p. 35; Gronoy. Zooph. p. 73 ; Barbue, Dubam. Péches, 111, sect. 9, c. 1, p. 262, pl. iy. PLEURONECTIDA, 15 Pleuronectes rhombus, Linn. Syst. i, p. 458; Briinn. Ich. Mass. p. 35; Bloch, Fische Deuts. ii, p. 36, t. xliii; Gmel. Linn. p. 1235; Bl. Schn. p. 152; Bonn. Ency. Ich. p. 77, pl. xli, f. 162; Lacép. iv, p. 649; Donovan, Brit. Fish. iv, pl. xcy ; Shaw, Zool.iv, p. 315; Turton, Brit. Fauna, p. 97; Risso, Ich. Nice, p. 315; Flem. Brit. Anim. p. 196; Jenyns, Manual, p. 462; Templeton, Mag. Nat. Hist. (2) 1837, i, p. 411; Johnston, Berwick. Nat. Hist. Club, 1838, i, p. 174; Thompson, N. H. Ireland, iv, p. 201; Gronov. ed. Gray, p. 90; McIntosh, Fish. St. Andrew’s, p. 180. Pleuronectes cristatus, Licht. in Bl. Schn. p. 153. Rhombus vulgaris, Cuv. Régne Anim.; Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (Hd. 1) ii, p. 240, ce. fig. (Hid. 2) ii, p. 831 (Hd. 3) i, p. 641; Parn. Wern. Mem. vii, p. 375 and Fish. Firth of Forth, p. 315; Costa, Fauna Nap. ii, p. 10, t. xlii; Kroyer, Dan. Fiske, ii, p- 405, c. fig.; T. Ogilby, Zoologist, 1876, p. 4754. Pleuronectes lioderma, Nardo. Ich. Adr. no. 132. Rhombus barbatus, Risso, Hurop. Mérid. ii, p. 251. Bothus rumolo, Rafin. Caratt. 23. Scophthalmus rhombus, Rafin. Indice, p. 14. Rhombus levis, Gottsche, Wiegm. Arch. 1835, p. 175; Bonap. Faun. Ital. iii, p. 23, t.f.2; Canest. Arch. Zool. i, p. 27, t. 1, f. 4; Nilss. Skand. Faun. Fisk. iv, p- 638; Giinther, Catal. iv, p. 410; Collett, p. 137; Stein. Ich. Span. u. Port. 1868, p. 48; Winther, Ich. Dan. Mar. p. 37; Giglioli, Pesc. Ital. p. 38; Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 340. Rhombus Linnet, Malm, p. 513. Pleuronectes passer, Gronoy. ed. Gray, p. 90. Psetta rhombus, Bonap. Pesce. Hur. 49; White, Catal. p. 102; McIntosh, Fish. North Uist, P. R. 8. Edin. v, 1862-64, p. 614. Brill, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, 1, p. 161, pl. elxi. B. vii, D. (63) 76-85, P. 11-12, V. 6, A. (50) 53-63, C. 15-17, L. 1. 150, Coc. pyl. 2, Vert. 12/24. Length of head 3{ to 43, of caudal fin 58 to 6, height of body 2 to 23 in the total length. Hyes—on the left side, the lower 1/2 (1/4 in the young) in advance of the upper: 1 diameter apart. Interorbital space flat. Its eye is not so elevated at its base as in the plaice or flounder, consequently it is not so lateral; externally it is similar to that of the turbot (page 12). Lower jaw projecting and the longer: the maxilla 2/5 the length of the head, and reaches to below the posterior third or hind edge of the lower orbit; anterior nostril with a valve; the posterior open. Teeth—small ones in jaws and on vomer, none on the palatine bones. Jins—dorsal commences on the snout, its first few rays having broad fringes which divide so as to give them a brush-like appearance: its rays are branched and the longest behind the middle of the fin. Pectoral on coloured side half as long as the head and longer than its fellow. Ventrals not attached to the anal: caudal rounded. (Gull-rakers—about 1/2 as long as the eye, thick, about 12 in the lower branch of the outer branchialarch. Scales—small, cycloid, continued on to the head and vertical fin rays: no tubercles on the body. No spine before the anal fin. Lateral-line—with a strong curve anteriorly reaching to some little distance beyond the extremity of the pectoral fin when it becomes straight. Colours—of a sandy brown on the left side, usually speckled with white or light dots or spots: fins slightly marbled. Under surface white with sometimes a few black or gray spots along the bases of the vertical fins. Varieties—Apparent hybrids between the turbot and brill have been alluded to (see page 13). Yarrell figures the deformed head of one of these fish, see also Zoologist, 1855, p. 4596. Double brill are not rare. I obtained one on February 11th, 1881, 214 inches in length from Brixham : also reversed and albino ones are occasionally observed. Thompson mentions an example which was covered over with large, stellate, white markings on a very rich-coloured dark “round,” looking precisely as if a shower of snow had fallen on it. Couch remarked upon haying seen an example intensely black, with a few whit2 specks on the anal fin. According to Moreau, some examples of this fish from France 16 ANACANTHINI. would appear to have less rays in the dorsal and anal fins than observed off the coasts of Great Britain. He also remarks upon a Mediterranean variety in which the anterior rays of the dorsal fin are much less branched than is usual, Pleuronectes pavonina, Costa, is the young of this species. Names.— Pearl, kite, brett, “brit”? in Cornish means “ spotted.’’ Upon the coasts of Devonshire and Cornwall it is known by the name of “kite” (Pennant, ed. 1812). Bastard turbot, Moray Firth: siller fluke, Aberdeen: bonnet fluek, Aberlady Bay: used to be termed lug-a-leaf in Cornwall (Willughby). La Barbue, French. Habits—Found in sandy bays, also in deep water, and occasionally enters the estuaries formed by large rivers. It feeds on crustacea, small fish and food similar to that consumed by the turbot. Means of capture.—Similar to what are adopted for the turbot. In the Firth of Forth it is mostly taken by the hook, but not so along the Cornish coast. Breeding.—Said to spawn in spring (Parnell). As food.—Abundant in our markets, but not held in so much esteem as the turbot, yet is superior to the plaice. In Ireland it is most esteemed in spring. Habitat.—Coasts of Europe, becoming rarer towards the north. It is found round the British Isles and through the Mediterranean. It is rare in the Orkneys and Zetland (Baikie): also off Banff (Edward) : it is taken at Aberdeen (Sim) : occasionally in the Moray Firth, while it is abundant at St. Andrew’s (McIntosh). Neill records it at Aberlady Bay, Parnell in the Firth of Forth: while off Yorkshire it is resident and not uncommon (Yorkshire Vertebrata) : Norfolk estuary common (Paget): it is found generally along the east coast becoming, however, abundant along the south coast. In Iveland it is common round the coast, taken with, but much more | abundant on sand banks than the turbot, on the north-east coast at least four to one (Thompson). The example figured was from the south coast. As to the size it attains on our shores, Yarrell states that it rarely exceeds 8 lb. in weight, Parnell 10 lb. while Thompson’ s finest example was two feet in length. PLEURONECTID. 17 Genus IV —Znvcoprervs, Glottsche. Rhombus (part), Lepidorhombus, and Phrynorhombus, Giinther. Branchiostegals seven: pseudobranchic present. Hyes on the left side and close together. Cleft of mouth deep. Sharp villiform teeth in a band wn either jaw, present or absent from the vomer. The dorsal fin commences before the upper eye, ats rays and those of the anal are nearly all branched. Caudal not united to the vertical fins. The ventrals either free from or united to the anal. Scales ctenord. Lateral-line having a strong curve anteriorly. Steenstrup (Overs. Dansk. Vid. Selsk. 1865, pp. 95-112) pointed out that a large opening exists in the septum which is normally situated between the gills of the two sides: that he observed such in Rhombus megastoma, Donovan: R. cardina, Fries.: R. punctatus, Bloch: and R. unimaculatus, Risso, considering this as indicative that all these fornis belong to the same genus, he adopted Gottsche’s nomenclature of Zeugopterus. Geographical distribution.—Shores of northern Europe, to the south coasts of Great Britain and France. The British forms may be subdivided as follows :— A. Ventrals not united to the anal. 1. Zeugopterus wnimaculatus, D. 70-80, A. 61-68. Teeth absent from the vomer. B. Ventrals united to the anal. ' 2. Zeugopterus punctatus, D. 87-101, A. 69-80. Teeth present on the vomer. A. Ventrals not united to the anal. 1. Zeugopterus unimaculatus, Plate XCIX. La petite Limandelle, Duhamel, Pesc. iii, sect. 9, p. 270, pl. vi, f. 5. Pleuronectes punctatus, Flem. Wern. Mem. ii, p. 241, Phil. Zool. t. iti, f. 2, and Brit. An. p. 196; Jenyns, Manual, p. 462; Steenstrup, Overs. Dansk. Vid. Selsk. 1865. Rhombus punctatus, Yarrell, Brit. Fishes (Hd. 1) ii, p. 247, c. fig. (Hd. 2) ii, p. 338 (Hd. 3) i, p. 650; Thompson, Ann. Nat. Hist. ii, p. 271, and Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p. 201. Rhombus unimaculatus, Risso, Hur. Mérid. iii, p. 252, f. 35; Nilss. Skan. Fauna, iv, p. 645. Rhombus cardina (Cuv.) Kroyer, Dan. Fiske, ii, p. 464. Scophthalmus wnimaculatus, Bonap. Pesc. Hur. p. 49; Steind. Ich. Span. u. Port. 1868, p. 49. fthombus uniocellatus, Nardo, Prod. Ich. Adriat. no. 135. Zeugopterus punctatus, White, Catal. p. 104; Winther, Ich. Dan. Mar. p. 38. Phrynorhombus wnimaculatus, Ginther, Catal. iv, p. 414; Canestr. Fauna Ital. p. 161; Giglioli, Pesc. Ital. p. 38. Pleuronectes unimaculatus, Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 323. Lickstrim’s topknot, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, iii, p. 175, pl. clxvii. B. vii, D. 70-80, P. 10-12, V. 5, A. 61-68, C. 16. 18 ANACANTHINI. Length of head 32, of caudal fin 71, height of body 2 in the total length. Eyes—on the left side the lower one (which is said to be occasionally provided with a tentacle) slightly in advance of the upper, while they are divided by a narrow elevated ridge, diameter about 1/4 of the length of the head, and 1 diameter from the end of the snout. Lower jaw prominent, cleft of mouth very oblique, the length of the maxilla equals more than half of that of the head. Gill rakers rather widely set and about half as long as the diameter of the orbit. Teeth—fine ones in the jaws: none on the palate. Fins—the dorsal commences over the posterior nostril, and is continued nearly to the base of the caudal fin, its first ray is setiform, and of varying length, while the highest point of the fin is above the blotch on the posterior third of the lateral-line. Pectoral on the coloured side upwards of two-thirds the length of the head, and having its upper rays prolonged: on the blind side it is much shorter. Ventral not conjoined to the anal: the last fin of a similar shape to the dorsal. Caudal rounded. The fin rays are branched at their extremities, and each has a row of scales. Scales— small and strongly ctenoid, each having from four to six spines at its posterior extremity. They are continued over the head, jaws, and fin rays. Those on the blind side are also spinate. Lateral-line—forms a curve over the pectoral, becoming straight opposite the last third of that fin. Colowrs—reddish brown, covered with large, irregularly placed and dark round spots and blotches, one very distinct being situated at the commencement of the last third of the straight portion of the lateral-line. Under surface white. Dr. Giinther considers this fish the type a new genus Phrynorhombus, Ginther, while Steenstrup remarks that it could only form a sub-genus. Names.— Bloch’s topknot. Le Pleuronecte unimaculé, French. Habits.—These have not been recorded. Means of capture.—Trawls and appliances useful for taking flat-fish. Habitat—¥rom the coasts of Denmark, round the British Isles to the Mediterranean, in which sea it is rare, but more frequent off the coast of Italy. _ Off Zetland one example was procured by Fleming, where the fishermen stated it was not common. Berwickshire (Johnston): in 1860 one off Redcar, in Yorkshire (Ferguson). Examples are in the British Museum from Plymouth, also Weymouth, from which latter locality Henslow sent it to Yarrell. Cornish obtained one, August 26th, 1880, in Cornwall; while Couch alludes to it from the British Channel in 1863. It is evidently far more rare than Zeugopterus punctatus. Ireland—North-east coast, one 4¢ inches long, taken June 16th, 1838, by Dr. Drummond, dredging within the entrance of Belfast Bay. August 19th, 1844, Mr. Hyndman, dredging in Belfast Bay, between Carrickfergus and Graypoint, in from 3 to 6 fathoms water, captured two, each 3 inches long. The example figured is in the national collection. The fish has been recorded up to about 5 inches in length from British waters. B. Ventrals united to the anal. 2. Zeugopterus punctatus, Plate C. Smear-dab, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (ed. 1776) iii, p. 230, pl. xl, Topknot oe sees p- 322, pl. lvii. Grosse Plie ou Targeur, Duhamel, Pesc. iii, sect. splay, 4. Pleuronectes punctatus, Bl. 1787, t. clxxxix; Bonn. Ency. Ich. p. 78, pl. xci, f. 378; Bl. Schn. p. 155; Shaw, Zool. p. 316 (part). Pleuronectes kitt, Bl. Schn. p. 162. Pleuronectes hirtus, Abilgaard in Mill. Zool. Dan. 1788, iii, p. 36, t. ciii; Thompson, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1837, p. 60, and Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p. 203; PLEURONECTID &. 19 Jenyns, p. 463; Johnston, Berwick. Nat. Hist. Field Club, 1838, i, p. 174; Fries, Wiegm. Arch. 1840, p- 32; Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 321. Zeugopterus hirtus, Gottsche, Wiegm. Arch. 1835, p. 178; White, Catal. p- 103. Scophthalmus hirtus, Bonap. Pesc. Eur. p. 49. Whiff, Couch, Linn. Trans. xiv, p. 78. Rhombus hirtus, Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (Hd. 1) ui, p. 243, c. fig. (Hd. 2), ii, p. 334 (Hd. 3) i, p. 646; Parnell, Wern. Mem. vii, p. 376, and Fish. Firth of Nissi p. 216; Nilss. Skand. Fauna, iv, p. 646; Ross, Zool. 1843, p- 106, c. fig. Bhombus punctatus, Giinther, Catal. iy p: 413, Zeugopterus punctatus, Collett, Norges Fiske, p. 139; Malm, p. 518 ; Winther, Ich. Dan. Mar. p. 38. Muller’s and Bloch’s topknot, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, iii, pp. 170, 173, pl. elxv, elxvi. B. vii, D. 87-101, P. 10, V. 6, A. 69-80, C. 14-16, Vert. 12/25, Coec. pyl. 0. Length of head 3} to 32, of caudal fin 7 to 74, height of body about 2 to 23 in the total length. Hyes—on the left side, upper margin covered by a thick skin, the lower eye slightly in advance of the upper, | diameter from the end of the snout, and ; to 4 of the length of the head. Interorbital space narrow but not elevated. Cleft of mouth very oblique: the lower jaw rather projecting anteriorly. Teeth —in a villiform band in the jaws, present also on the vomer. (Gull-rakers— closely set, the longest about 2/3 the diameter of the eye. Fins—dorsal commences on the snout, its anterior rays not so long as the diameter of the eye: they gradually increase in length, becoming longest in the commencement of the last third of the body where they equal half the length of the head: the posterior ones short, and the fin passing beneath the base of the caudal, becomes almost conjoined with the anal, which is similarly turned under the tail. Left pectoral nearly half as long as the head, right pectoral half as long as left. Ventral commencing under the throat, is joined posteriorly to the anal: the skin from this fin passes to the posterior surface of the base of the anal rays, @ groove being formed for the vent. Caudal rounded. Scales—spinate on the coloured side, present on rays of vertical and caudal fins. Smooth on the blind side. Lateral- line—forms a curve over the base of the pectoral fin, after which it becomes straight. Colowrs—of a rich dark brown, having a wide black, light-edged band passing backwards and outwards from each eye. Three or four round black marks on the back, and some irregular dark blotches and occasionally numerous light spots. Jaws blackish. Fins dark brown, with some irregular bands and blotches, more especially on the dorsal or anal. Under surface white. Pennant’s figure in his edition of 1776, 1. c., erroneously termed smear-dab, is reversed, due most probably to an artistic error. Varieties.—According to Mr. R. Couch this fish is very subject to malformation of the anterior end of the dorsal fin, causing it to form an arch over the eyes. J. Couch observed upon having seen this fish with almost the whole of its upper surface, except the head and a small patch near the tail, without colours or scales, like the lower surface: the border of the dorsal and anal fins yellowish red, and with only two or three rays having scales; on the tail the rays extended beyond the border of the membrane. In another instance there was no caudal portion, so that where the dorsal and anal fins were brought closely together the body terminated. Names.—Browny in Cornwall: little black hairy fluke, Edinburgh market, At Penzance I obtained this fish and the fishermen insisted that it was a young brill. Le Pleuronecte Targeur, French. Habits.—Frequents sandy bays, with low shelving rocks covered with sea- weed, where it conceals itself. It is very remarkable how difficult it is to find in an aquarium, as it hides itself in the darkest corners. Means of capture.——Trammels, or nets set for sur-mullets. In the Firth of Forth occasionally taken in crab-cages. Breeding.—‘ Summer and autumn, and in winter, the young are of about »* 20 ANACANTHINI. 1 or 2 inches in length, and may occasionally be found under stones at low water- mark ” (R. Couch). As food.— Mr. Cornish found its flesh to be excellent. Habitat.—From the coasts of northern Europe, round Great Britain to France, where, however, it is very rare. Round the British coast it is by no means rare, and even common off Cornwall. Several examples have been obtained in the Orkneys (W. Baikie); it occurs at intervals off Banffshire and along the whole line of coast (Edward) ; Aberdeen (Sim) ; not common at St. Andrew’s (McIntosh) ; Firth of Forth (Smith), where Parnell observes that it is rarely seen except during stormy weather; off Berwickshire rare (Johnson). Mr. Anderson Smith obtained three examples in 1882 from Loch Creram in Argyleshire. Two examples, taken in February, 1852, at Redcar (Rudd, Zoologist, p. 3504), and a third recorded by Ferguson ; also, in 1836, several found there on the beach, but none for the succeeding eight years (Meynell) ; in fact itis of rare occurrence in Yorkshire (Yorkshire Vertebrata), one at Bridlington on May 27th, 1881 (Boynton); the Medway (Henslow). Along the south coast it has been very frequently taken; at St. Leonards, in 1872 (Bowerbank, Zool. p. 2996); August 23rd, 1865, one at Bovisand, Devon, another March 12th, 1873 (Parfitt), while off that county it is frequent during the spring months (Baker) ; at Weymouth, in August, 1854, _ a fine example was taken by a trawler (Gosse); off Teignmouth, in January, 1843, one 63 inches long was captured in a drift net. I obtained it at Penzance on August 13th, 1881, and heard of many more along the coast, some of which I saw; in fact Mr. Cornish (1866, Zool. p. 311), recording one taken in May at Penzance, remarked that he had obtained 48 examples since 1858. Bristol Channel (Baker) ; Swansea (Dillwyn); Anglesea (Gosden). In Ireland one, 6} inches in length, was taken March 25th, 1835, at Ardglass, co. Down; September 30th, 1842, Dr. Ball obtained one, 73 inches long, off Kingston Pier ; 2 more were purchased in the Dublin market and sent to the University Museum ; in 1865 one was captured in the winter (Blake-Knox, Zool. 1866, p. 508) ; in 1853 another, 54 inches long, at Dalkey Sound, in 8 or 10 fathoms of water, and presented to the Dublin Nat. Hist. Soc. (Kinahan, Zool. 1853, p. 3990). The example figured was from Penzance. In British waters this fish attains to 7 or 8 inches in length. wee PLEURONECTIDE. 21 Genus V—Arnoctossus, Bleeker. Branchiostegals six or seven: pseudobranchie present. LHyes on the left side. Cleft of mouth deep. Teeth small and one or two. rows in both jaws: present or absent from the vomer : none on the palatines. Gill-membranes broadly united below the throat : gill-rakers fine. Dorsal fin commences on the snout and is not conjoined to the caudal. Preanal spines may be present. Scales of moderate size and deciduous. Lateral-line with a curve in the first portion of its course. Geographical distribution.—From the seas of northern EHurope, through the Mediterranean and the East Indian archipelago. 1. Arnoglossus megastoma, Plate XCVIII. Passer Cornubiensis, Jago in Ray, Syn. Pisc. p. 163, f. 2. Whiff, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (ed. 1776) iii, p. 238 (ed. 1812) iii, p. 324, pl. lii. Pleuronectes, sp. 30, Walb. Art. iii, p. 120. Carter, Couch, Trans. Linn. Soe. xiv, p. 78. Sthombus cardina, pt. Cuv. Regne Anim. ; Pleuronectes megastoma, Donovan, Brit. Fish. ii, pl. li; Turton, Brit. Fauna, p. 97; Fleming, p. 196; Jenyns, p. 464; Templeton, Mag. Nat. Hist. 1837 (2) i, p. 411; Thompson, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1835, p. 81, and Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p- 203; Yarrell, Brit. Fishes (Hd. 1) ii, p. 251, c. fig. (Hd. 2) ii, p. 342 (Hd. 3) i, p- 654; Johnston, Berw. Nat. Field Club, 1838, i, p. 174; Bonap. Pesce. Eur. p: 47; Diiben and Koren, Vet. Akad. Handl. 1844, p. 102; White, Catal. p.104; Schlegel, Dieren Neder. p. 165, pl. xv, f. 4; Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 332. Pleuronectes pseudopalus, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (ed. 1812) 11, p. 324, pl. li. Pleuronectes Boscii, Risso, Ich. Nice, p. 319, pl. vii, f. 33; Bonap. Faun. Ital. Cc. a Canest. Arch. Zool. t. i, p. 19, pl. u.f.2; Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 330. Hippoglossus Boscii, Risso, Eur. Mérid. iii, p. 246. Ethombus megastoma, Nilss. Skand. Fauna, iv, p. 641; Giinther, Catal. iv, p- 411; Malm, p. 516. Zeugopterus velivolans, Richards. Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (Hd. 3) i, p. 656 a. Zeugopterns megastoma, Collett, Norges Fiske, p. 138. Arnoglossus boscii, Ginther, Catal. iv, p. 416. Zeugopterus Goltsche, Winther, Ich. Dan. Mar. p. 38. Sail-fluke and Carter, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, iii, pp. 163, 167, pp. clxiii and clxiv. Bayi co-o9 (91), Po 13, V. 6, A. 61-71 (75), C. lo, Lely 104-110, Cece. pyl. 2, Vert. 11/30. Length of head 4, of caudal fin 53, height of body 3 in the total length. Hyes—on the left side, the lower nearly one-half in advance of the upper, diameter 1/4 of length of head, 1 diameter from the end of the snout, and only divided by a very narrow and ridged interorbital space. Lower jaw prominent; cleft of mouth oblique; the length of the maxilla equals nearly 1/2 the length of the head. eeth—in jaws rather small, and in about 2 rows; some on yomer: none on the palate. Jins—the dorsal fin commences in front of the upper eye, and is continued to within a moderately short distance of the base of the caudal fin, its longest rays being in the last third of the fin, most of them and also of anal fin are branched. Pectoral half as long as the head, ventral not conjoined to the anal, which latter fin terminates similarly to the dorsal. Caudal wedge- shaped. Free portion of the tail as long as high at its base. Scales—strongly ctenoid covering the head and body, also a row along each fin ray. Lateral line —with an almost semi-circular curve above the pectoral fin. No spine before the analfin. Gill-rakers closely set and about half as long as the diameter of the eye. Colowrs—of a brownish yellow with obscure spots: under side white, some- 22 ANACANTHINI. times tinged with red. Donovan mentions one which, he observes, had ten or twelve large dusky circular spots on the back, eight of which formed a circle not very indifferently represented by Mr. Jago in the figure given by Ray. Varieties.—Mr. R. Couch remarked that the dark side is mottled in individuals which inhabit rough ground. Couch observed that the Orkney fish were plumper than those from the south coast. Professor Giglioli first drew my attention to Arnoglossus boscw being this species. Names.—Whiff, merry sole a term applied due to its active movements when in the water. Carter, lantern referring to its semi-transparency when held up against the light. Sazl-fluke, Orkneys. She sole, Belfast; ow- or white-sole, Dublin. De sharretong, Dutch. Le Plewronecte mégastome ou Cardine, French. Habits.—Resides in Cornwall from about 4 to 15 miles from shore, and rarely enters sandy bays. Its large prominent eyes give the impression that its habitat is the deep sea. Off the Orkneys, Mr. Scarth says, it seldom comes to the shore earlier than October or later than April, though it is often driven by storms on the beach entangled among the sea-weed. He tells us the black-backed gulls capture numbers. Dr. Duguid observes that this fish does not take a bait, and he only once saw it caught in a net, but, he adds, off sandy shores and in calm weather it comes ashore spontaneously, with its tail erected above the water, like a boat under sail, whence its name. In these favoured places dogs are trained to catch them! The period when this fish exhibits its gambols is most frequently before a storm, or when a thaw sets in, according to Mr. Scarth. These accounts, Couch observes, have been confirmed by Mr. Thompson, of North Ronaldshay, in which distant island the fishis not rare. Thompson found a Callionymus dracunculus 3 inches long, and 3 small Gadi in one; ina second 3 examples of Merlangus vulgaris 3 inches long; in a third only shrimp-lke crustacea. Means of capture.—The beam trawl, while it also takes a bait along the south- west coast, although it is said never to do so in the Orkneys. Baits——Similar to those employed for other flat fishes, which they take readily, especially a slice of a pilchard or mackerel. Breeding.—Thompson, on October 31st, at Belfast, procured one which had just shed its ova, only a few mature ones remaining. As food.—Of but little value, or, as Borlase remarked, good for nothing. In the Orkneys, however, Dr. Duguid observes that it is highly prized as an article of food, its flesh being white and firm ; but that it loses its flavour by a single day’s keeping. Hig theo the northern seas round the British to the French coasts. It is found in the Orkneys; is rather rare off Banff (Hdward) ; Aberdeen (Sim); rare in Berwickshire (Johnston) ; resident in moderate numbers off Yorkshire (Yorkshire Vertebrata). Has been taken along the south coast, appears to be common off Devonshire and Cornwall. Mr. Dunn observes that it is not uncommon to see 30 or 40 brought in by a trawler in one day. It has been captured off Somersetshire (Baker); Carnarvonshire (Donovan); Flintshire (Pennant). In Ireland it is occasionally taken from north to south along the east coast. From Down and Belfast single individuals are brought to the Belfast market. It is obtained at all seasons. Bell had it from Dublin and Youghal. During the winter of 1865 it was rather plentiful (Blake-Knox, Zool. 1866, p. 508). The example figured was 10 inches in length. For it I am indebted to Mr. D’Urban, of the Exeter Museum, in the market of which town it does not appear to be uncommon. As to the size it may attain, the four largest Thompson records were from 22 to 235 inches in length. Donovan observes that one brought to him, October 31st, 1775, was 18 inches long. 2. Arnoglossus laterna, Plate XCIX, fig. 2. Arnoglossus, Rondel. xi, c. 14, p. 324; Aldrov. ii, c. 43, p. 237; Jonston, i, tit. 1, c. 2a, pune. 1, p. 58; Gesner, Aquat. iv, p. 668; Wil. p. 102, t. F 8, f. 7. Smooth sole, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (ed. 1776) iii, p. 232 and scald-fish (ed. 1812) p. 325. PLEURONECTID 2. 23 _ Pleuronectes laterna, Walb. Art. 111, p. 121; White, Catal. p. 104. Pleuronectes casurus, Hanmer, in Pennant, l.c. (ed. 1812) iii, p. 325, pl. li; Bonap. Pesce. Hur. p. 47. Pleuronectes diaphanus, Shaw, Zool. iv, p. 309. Pleuronectes Leotardi, Risso, Ich. Nice, p. 318. Rhombus nudus, Risso, Hur. Mérid. iii, p. 251; Cuv. Rég. Anim. Pleuronectes pellucidus, Nardo, Ich. Adriat. no. 134. Pleuronectes arnoglossus, Bl. Schn. p. 157; Turton, p. 97; Fleming, p. 197; Bonap. Faun. Ital. Pesce. c. fig.; Jenyns, p. 465; Canestr. Arch. Zool. i, p. 14, tay. i, f. 4; Thompson, Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p. 205; Moreau, Poiss. France, ili, p. 328. Rhombus arnoglossus, Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (Hd. 1) 1, p. 254, c. fig. (Hd. 2) ii, p- 345 (Ed. 3) i, p. 644. Hippoglossus arnoglossus, Costa, Fauna Nap. ii, p. 32. Arnoglossus laterna, Giinther, Catal. iv, p. 415; Steind. Ich. Span. u. Port. 1868, p. 50; Collett, Norges Fiske, p. 140; Canestr. Fauna Ital. p. 162; Giglioli, Pesce. Ital. p. 38. Megrim, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, ii, p. 177, pl. elxviii. B. vii, D. 87-90, P. 10-11, V. 6, A. 64-68, C. 15, L. 1. 48. Length of head 43, of caudal fin 61, height of body 2? to 3 in the total length. Hyes—on the left side, separated by a narrow, elevated and scaleless ridge: lower eye slightly in advance of the upper: diameter 44 in the length of the head, 1 diameter from the end of the snout. Lower jaw slightly the longer: the maxilla equals 2/5 of the length of the head. Teeth—in a single row in either jaw, those in the mandibles somewhat the largest. Hinms—the dorsal commences on the snout, its first few rays being occasionally somewhat separated one from the others and a little elevated: the longest rays in the fin, which are half as long as the head, are behind its middle, none of them or of the anal are branched : the vertical fins are continued almost to the root of the caudal, which latter fin is rounded. Left pectoral more than half the length of the head. The length of the base of the left ventral wide, extending from the throat to the vent, behind it are two prominent spines. Scales—rather large, deciduous: present on the gill- covers, none on the vertical fins. Lateral-line—anteriorly with a somewhat semi-circular curve becoming straight opposite the end of the pectoral. Free portion of the tail higher than long. Colowrs—of a brownish or pinkish on the left side : white beneath. Varieties—J. Edward (Zool. 1856, xiv, p. 5065) describes a fish 2? inches long, taken from the stomach of a cod. Dorsal commences in advance of upper eye, not confluent with caudal. V.very small. Anal commences below gill cover. Hyes on left side, even. Scales not large, deciduous. L.1. straight. Pointed teeth in both jaws. Coloured side flesh-colour, at regular distances on extreme edge of D. and A. fins are seven black spots ? Pleuronectes diaphanus. Has seen three specimens. Black spots present in all. In Yarrell’s collection were three species of a fish termed Arnoglossus lophotes, Giinther, but whence they came has not been recorded, D. 95, A. 77, L. 1. 60. They appear to be very closely allied to A. laterna. Yarrell (Kd. 1) p. 255, remarks upon possessing a Mediterranean skin of this species. Couch, in, p- 178, introduces this as a British species. Names.—Scald-fish, derived from its appearance when captured, as it then appears as if it had been dipped in scalding water, for not only does slight friction cause its scales to drop off but likewise rubs off its skin. Megrim, Cornwall : Lanthern-fish, Cornwall apud Halliwell: smooth sole. Le Plewronecte Arnoglosse, French. Habits.—Of these but little appears to be known, but the majority of British examples have been captured along the S.W. coast, usually on a sandy bottom and at some considerable depth. It is said to be a favourite food of congers and other large fishes which frequent deep waters. Means of capture——Does not appear to take a bait, perhaps due to the small 24 ANACANTHINI. size of its mouth, as well as to its living at depths where only large hooks are tried. It is often captured off Cornwall with the beam trawl. Breeding.—Risso observes that in the Mediterranean it is very prolific. As food.—It is not of sufficient size to be of use for the table. Habitat—From the coast of Norway to those of Great Britain and Ireland, also through the Mediterranean, in which last locality it is tolerably abundant. Off Banffshire it is very scarce (Hdward) : Devonshire not common (Parfitt) : but has been recorded from Plymouth (Hanmer) and Weymouth (Jenyns) : off Cornwall Mr. Cornish observed that it is not common and considers it a variety of the ‘‘carter:’ one example appears to have been obtained at Swansea (Dillwyn). Z In Ireland an example was taken off the Galway coast by Mr. Todhunter, September, 1848, which is now in the Dublin University Museum. Has also been taken off the coast of Cork (Ball): and several from Dingle Bay in 25 fathom water (Yarrell). “‘Was trawled abundantly off this (Dublin) coast last winter and spring. I saw some hundreds used for baiting crab-pots in the spring” (H. Blake-Knox, Zool. 1866, p. 508). Couch has recorded one 63 inches in length, and observes that it attains to 7 inches. PLEURONECTID&. os Genus VI—Purvronectzs, Artedi. Platessa, Cuvier; Limanda, Microstomus, and Glyptocephalus, Gottsche : Platichthys, Girard; Clidoderma, Pseudopleuronectes, Brachyprosopon, Bleeker. Branchiostegals five to seven: pseudobranchic present. Hyes on the right side: the wpper not in advance of the lower. Cleft of mouth shallow. Teeth of a moderate size, in a single or double row in each jaw, and which are most developed on the blind side: none on the vomer or palate. Dorsal fin commences above the eyes: both pectorals present. Vertical fins not confluent. Scales small or rudimentary. Considerable differences are observable in the species composing this genus, as may be perceived when observing the numerous sub-divisions into which it has been subjected. Irrespective of this, considerable variations are found among individuals belonging to the same species, as has been already remarked upon as a family characteristic (see page 3). While Gill has observed a species in which the male has rough and the female smooth scales, while during the breeding season the teeth are movable in both sexes. As bait for these fishes on foul ground lug-worms and pieces of the flesh of the conger or herring are much used. But the majority along the British coasts are obtained by means of the beam trawl. I shall defer the consideration of this mode of fishing until arriving at the valuable genus of Solea (page 37). The British forms belonging to this genus have been thus divided :— A. Teeth lanceolate and compressed. a. Lateral-line nearly or quite straight. 1. A spine before the anal fin. 1. Pleuronectes platessa, D. 66-77, A. 50-57. Rough interorbital ridge. 2. Plewronectes microcephalus, D. 85-93, A. 70-76. Yellowish, blotched with darker patches. 2. No spine before the anal fin. 3. Plewronectes cynoglossus, D. 102-115, A. 86-97. b. Lateral-line strongly curved anteriorly. A. Pleuronectes limanda, D. 65-78, A. 50-62. B. Teeth conical. a. Lateral-line with a slight curve anteriorly. 5. Pleuronectes flesus, D. 60-62, A. 39-45. Ossicles at base of dorsal and anal rays. A. Teeth lanceolate and compressed. a. Lateral-line nearly or quite straight. 1. A spine before the anal fin. 1, Pleuronectes platessa, Plate CI. Passer vulgaris and Quadratulus, i, p.143; Belon. i, p. 142. Passer, pt. Rondel. xi, c. 7, p. 316; Gesner, pp. 664, 670; Schonev. p. 61; Ray, p. 3l. Alia passeris species, Rondel. xi, c. 8, p. 318. Passer levis, Aldrov. i, c. 47, p. 243 ; Jonston, i, tit. iii,c. 3, art, 2, punct.i, t. xxii. Pleuronectes, sp. Artedi, 26 ANACANTHINI. Gen. p. 17, no. 1, Spec. p. 57, no. 1, Synon. p. 30, no. 1; Gronoy. Zooph. no. 246. pete. spec. Klein, Pisc. Mss. iv, p. 34, no. 6, t. vu, f.3. Passer Bellonit, Willughby. p. 96, t. F.3; Rutty, co. Dublin, 1772, p. 850. Plaise, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (Hd. 1776) lll, p. 228, and (Hd. 1812) il, p. 3804. Carrelet ou Dine, Duhamel, Péches, ix, p. 264, pl. v, f.1, 2, and Pl, l.c. p.265, pl. v,£.3. The Plaice, Low, Faun. Orcad. p. 212. Pleuronectes platessa, Linn. Syst. Nat. i, p. 456; Bloch, Fische Deuts. 11, p. 31, t. xlii; Gmel. Linn. p. 1228; Bl. Schn. p. 144; Bonn. Ency. Ich. p. 74; Lacép. iv, p. 628; Donovan, Brit. Fish. i, pl. vi; Shaw, Zool. iv, p. 297, pl. xlu; Quensel, Vet. Akad. Handl. 1806, p.211; Turton, Brit. Fauna, p. 96; Pallas, Zoogr. Ross.-As. ili, p. 423; Faber, Fische Isl. p. 135, and Isis, 1828, p. 865; Nilss. Skand. Faun. iv, p. 612 ; Swainson, Fishes, ii, p. 802; Gronov. ed. Gray, p. 87; Giinther, Catal. iv, p. 440 ; Schlegel, Dier. Ned. p. 166, pl. xvi, f.1; Ogilby, Zool. 1876, p. A755 McIntosh, Fish. St. Auanee p. 180; Collett, Norges Fiske, p. 144; Malm, p. 525; Winther, Ich. Dan. Mar. p. 39; Giglioli, Pesce. Ital. p. 38. ‘ Platessa vulgaris, Fleming, Brit. An. p. 198; Gotts. Wiegm. Arch. 1835, p. 134; Fleming, p. 198; Jenyns, Manual, p. 454; Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (Hd. 1) 1, p- 209, c. fig. (Hd. 2) ii, p. 297 (Ed. 3) i, p. 605; Parnell, Wern. Mem. vii, p. 361, t. xxxvi, and Fish. Firth of Forth, p. 201, t. 37; Gottsche, Wiegm. Arch. 1835, p- 140; Kroyer, Dan. Fiske, 11, Ss 347, c. fig.; Templeton, Mag. Nat. Hist (2) 1837, i, p. 411; Bonap. Catal. p. 403, and Pesc. Eur. 48; Johnston, Berwick. Nat. Club, 1838, te pa (Ane "Themeyaaer, Nat. Hist. Thelen? iv, Pp. 192 ; White, Catal. p. 98; korea. Poiss. ‘France, i ‘lily, [oe Agile Plaice, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, iii, p. 181, pl. clxix. B. vii, D. 66-77, P. 10-11, V. 6, A. 50-57, C. 17-18, Vert. 14/29, Coec. pyl. 2 (3-4). Length of head 43, of caudal fin 5}, height of body 22 in the total length. Hyes —on the right side, the lower one-fourth to half in advance of the upper, nearly 1 diameter from the end of the snout, while the two are divided by a narrow, smooth, ridge. During life they are much elevated. Lower jaw in advance of the upper with a knob at symphysis: the length of the maxilla equals that of the orbit, while it reaches posteriorly to beneath the first third of the eye. The anterior nostril tubular: the posterior oval and patent. The interorbital ridge is continued as several rough tubercles to the lateral-line. T'eeth—compressed and truncated at their summits, 20 to 24 in the upper jaw on the blind side, those on - the other side being few and smaller; those in lower jaw similar to those in the upper. Gill-rakers few, short, and widely set. Hins—the dorsal commences above the middle of the eye, and ceases a little before the base of the caudal fin, the interspace being less than the depth of the free portion of the tail below it: the 35th to the 38th ray the longest, and more than half as long as the head. The pectorals on both sides of equal length and 2/5 that of the head. Caudal rounded. A spine directed forwards is situated just before the base of the anal fin. Scales—from 90 to 100 rows, cycloid; some on cheeks, none between the eyes. None along bases of dorsal and anal fins. Lateral-line—slightly curved above the pectoral fin, the extent of the depth of which is less than the length of the pectoral fin: the greatest depth between its straight portion and the anal fin is less than the length of the head. Intestines—two short ccecal appendages ; the length of the intestinal tract, in a specimen eight inches long, from the pylorus to the vent was 7 inches. Colowrs—of a chestnut or rich brown on the right side, covered with large orange and sometimes black-edged spots. Varieties—Buckland mentions a variety destitute of spots. Reversed examples are not rare, piebald ones common. ‘These fish rapidly assume the colour of the ground on which they are residing. Canestrini considers Pleuronectes italicus, Giinther, to be this species. Names.—Plaice, diamond plaice, Sussex, from its lozenge-shaped spots. Plash fleuk, Moray Firth. age or facg, Anglo-Saxon. De schol, Dutch. La Plie Franche ou Carrelet, French. PLEURONECTID i. 27 Habits.—In the Orkneys, according to Low, it keeps much to sand banks and muddy ground. During the summer months on the east coast of Scotland it appears to frequent rocky localities, but in February and March seeks sandy places where it can deposit its spawn. In Cornwall it has been observed to select water of a moderate depth, and in May to arrive inshore, also in the autumn it is found in shoals in the quiet bays, but when the frost sets in it retires to the deep. When disturbed it will shoot away suddenly for a short distance, and can work itself rapidly into the sand where it lies concealed with only its eyes being apparent. Has great tenacity of life; one 10 inches long taken in January lived thirty hours after removal from the water: it was kept ten hours in a very warm room where it lay all the time on a dry plate (Thompson). Thompson found in the intestinal canal of some taken in Belfast Bay, Tellina tenuis, fragments of Mactria solida and Mytilus edulis. In June large ones contained some Aphrodita aculeata, portions of Buccinum wundatum, with the remains of Decapod Crustacea, April Lucina radula, &e. In Hast Friesland it has been transferred to freshwater ponds where it thrives. Means of capture.—Low says that in the Orkneys “ a few are caught on small lines made on purpose ; but they are not much sought after.” Around the British coast they are taken by lines or beam trawls. Spillers also are shot in sheltered sandy bays, the bait employed being the lug-worm or a mollusc removed from its shell. They are speared in the seas of northern Europe where the water is very clear, heavily leaded doubly barbed spears being employed according to Pontoppidan. Breeding.—The plaice appears usually to breed about February and March, but sometimes in autumn and early winter. On February 4th this year, 1882, I obtained a male, which weighed 1+ lb., full of milt. Mr. Jackson, in sending some ova of this fish to Mr. Buckland, remarked that they were obtained from a ripe and enormously distended female in one of the tanks in the Southport Aquarium. The ova ran freely, and at first floated on the surface, but when the vessel was perfectly still they slowly settled to the bottom. The slightest motion of the water occasioned them to float. The young are “first seen in April, close to land, Swimming on the surface of the sea, on their edge, with an eye on each side. In about a week after being first seen, they may be found in pools near the shore, about the size of a baby’s finger nail” (Dunn). Buckland found that a plaice which weighed 4lb. 150z. contained 1 lb. 9 0z. of roe, or 144,600 eggs, which were of a large size as compared with those of the turbot. Thompson obtained examples 3 inches long in January, 1835. Life history—The opinion was formerly entertained that the plaice is descended from a shrimp, and Dr. Deslandes investigated the subject. He first placed some of the shrimps in a vessel of salt water, and after twelve or thirteen days he discovered eight or nine young plaice. ‘The next year be placed some of these fish in two different salt-water receptacles, and to one lot he added a few of the shrimps, not so to the other. Both lots spawned, but it was only where the shrimps were that any young were produced. On examining the shrimps, he discovered the ova attached to the under surface of these crustaceans, and he felt persuaded that their maternal care is a necessity for bringing forth the fry. But Lacépeéede suggested that the shrimps eat the ova of flat-fishes, and some may become glued to their under surface when they are unable to devour them. Comparatively rare as the male is, as already observed, I obtained one full of milt in February, 1882. Respecting how it is that in some localities the number of plaice appears to have decreased (see page 37). As food.—This fish is in the best condition about May, and Mr. Mayhew computed that upwards of three millions are annually consumed in London. Off Devonshire its quality, observes Parfitt, depends upon the nature of the ground on which it is captured, for, if muddy or sandy, the taste partakes more or less of either. When from sand it is firm and sweet; if from mud, the reverse. In Banffshire it is held in little estimation; it is usually deemed poor as food, but bears carriage well. In Ireland, however, Thompson states that it is held in general esteem. 28 ANACANTHINTI. Habitat.—From Iceland, along the coasts of northern Europe, to the British and French shores: what was believed to be this species was recorded extending in diminished numbers into the Mediterranean, and in 1878 for the first time to the Adriatic (F. Trois, Alti Ist. Venet. (5), iv, 1878, p. 321). Found all round our coasts. In the Orkneys and Zetland abundant (Baikie) : Moray Fir th common, especially during April: Banff (Hidward) : Aberdeen (Sim) : St. Andrew’s (McIntosh): Firth of Forth (Parnell): Berwickshire (Johnston) : Yorkshire resident, very common, but Mr. Mudd informs us that it is becoming more scarce, and that ié is found in greatest numbers in or near the Dogger Bank (Yorkshire Vertebrata): at Great Grimsby its diminution is causing ‘alarm to some of the fishermen: Norfolk common (Lowe): found all along the south coast, the largest said to come from Sussex (Jenyns) : off Mevagissey in Cornwall they swarm in shoals during the autumn (Dunn) and Mr. Cornish observes that those from a hard, close, killas sand are usually good, edible fish: those from a loose gravelly sand are valueless. In Ireland it is abundant round the coast; .to the north it is the most common species of flat-fish. At Belfast an example 12 1b. in weight was taken and sent to the University Museum. Although one of these fish, weighing 6 or 7 lb. is a fine example, Donovan and others have recorded it up to 15 1b. weight. 8. Pleuronectes microcephalus, Plate CII. Rhombus levis cornubicus, Jago in Ray, p. 162, f.1. Smear Dab, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (ed. 1776), iii, p. 230, pl. xli, (ed. 1812), iii, p. 309, pl.xlvii. Duhamel, Péch. pt. ui, sect. 9, p. 268, pl. vi, f. 3-4. Pleuronectes microcephalus, Donovan, Brit. Fish. u1, pl. xii; Turton, Fauna, p. 96; Fries, Vet. Akad. Handl. 1838, p. 173, and Wiegm. Arch. 1840, p. 24; Nilss. Skand. Faun. iv, p. 609; Gimther, Catal. iv, p. 447; McIntosh, Fish. St. Andrew’s, p. 180; Steind. SB. Ak. Wien, lxxx, Abth. i, p.165; Schlegel, Dieren Neder. p. 170, pl. xvi, f. 5; Collett, p. 145; Malm, p. 40. Pleuronectes levis, Shaw, Zool. iv, p. 299; Turton, 1. ec. p. 96. Pleuronectes Quenselii, Holb. Bohusl. Fisk. Goth. Vet. and Vitt. Sellsk. nya Handl. iv, p. 59, ¢. fig. Pleuronectes quadridens, Fabr. Kong]. Dansk. Vid. Selsk. Afhandl. i, p. 39, t. i, f. 10 and 11; Faber, Fische Isl. p. 138, and Isis, 1828, p. 884. Pleuronectes microstomus, Faber, Isis, 1828, p. 886, and Tids. Nat. v, p. 243; Nilss. Prod. Ich. Scand. p. 53. __ Platessa microcephala, Flem. Brit. An. p. 198; Jenyns, Man. p. 457; Parnell, Wern. Mem. vu, p. 366, t. xxxvili, and Fish. Firth of Forth, p. 206, t. xxxviii; Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (Hd. 1) 1, p. 221, c. fig. (Hd. 2) ii, p. 809 (Hd. 3) i, p. 622; Thompson, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1835, p. 81, and Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p. 196; Templeton, Mag. Nat. Hist. 1837 (2), 1, p. 411; Johnston, Berwick. Nat. Club, 1838, i, p. 174; Kroyer, Fiske Dan. 11, p. 316, c. fig.; Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p- 294. Pleuronectes cynoglossus, Nilss. Prod. Ich. Scand. p. 53 (not Skand. Fauna). Microstomus latidens, Gotts. Wiegm. Arch. 1835, p. 150. Cynoglossa microcephala, Bonap. Pesce. Eur. 48. Platessa levis, White, Catal. p. 99. Smear-dab, Couch, Fish. British Isles, 111, p. 187, pl. clxxi. B. vii, D. 85-93, P. 10, V. 5-6, A. 70-76, C. 15 ; L.1. 130, Cec. pyl. 4. Vert. 13/35 fiero of head 64 to 61, of caudal fin 6, height of body 23 to 3 in the total length. Hyes—the lower shghtly in advance of the upper, placed close together, and not 1/2 a diameter from the end of the snout. Jaws of equal length in “front : the maxilla not reaching to beneath the front eye. Anterior nostril tubular ; the posterior round and patent. Teeth—conical, rather compressed and blunted, from PLEURONECTIDA. 29 11 to 13 in either jaw on the blind side. Gill-rakers—very short: not numerous. Fins—dorsal commences above the centre of the upper eye; its rays are longest in the posterior half of the body, where they equal about 1/2 the length of the head. Pectorals of about equal size, and 13 in the length of the head. Ventrals free. No spine before the anal fin, which letter 1s =ylnmal to the dorsal. Caudal rounded. Scales—cycloid, covering the head (except the snout), body, and minute ones on the coloured surface of the vertical fin rays. No filament on the head. Lateral- line—on hboth sides, at first makes a slight curve, more pronounced in some examples than in others, the convexity of which is above, it is then continued almost direct to the centre of the base of the caudal fin. Colowrs—dull yellowish, blotched, and with dark spots, more especially over the chest and along the base of the anal fin. Dark blotches and spots likewise on the anal, caudal, and ventral fins. A dark base to pectoral, which has also some cloudy markings. On the under surface Pennant observed that it was sometimes marked with fine large dusky spots, but that such were not persistent. Varieties.—Thompson took an example similar to Donovan’s, March 3rd, 1835, D. 93, P. 9, V. 5, A. 76; it was free from spots, obscurely marked on the upper side and vertical fins with many shades of brown, gray and dull yellow: the orange stripe round the base of the operculum being very conspicuous: it and another had a lemon mark about an inch behind the base of the pectoral on the coloured side. Names.—Smear-dab, due to its being frequently covered with slime; lemon- dab or lemon-sole (Belfast) owing to its colours ; Mary sole, Scotland, Devonshire and Cornwall, in which last county it has likewise been known as kit; smooth-dab or bastard-sole; town-dab, Hastings; French sole, Youghal; sole-fleuk, Moray Firth; sand-flewk, Edinburgh. De Tongschar, Dutch. Le * Plié mucrocéphale, French. Habits.—Parnell observes that in the Firth of Forth it appears during the spring, but two or three seasons pass when not half-a-dozen of these fish are seen in the Edinburgh market. In 1835 they were unusually plentiful, particularly in February, but after March they were scarcely ever met with. Having shed their spawn about April they retire to rocky ground for the remainder of the year. They feed on shell fish and crustacea. ‘Thompson found a Nereis in one. Means of capture.— Beam trawl, and with small hooks. Baits.—Soft molluscous animals. Breeding.— Spawns in May and June. Thompson found one in roe in March, 1835, but omits to mention if the ova were well developed or the contrary. As food.—Thompson considered it “‘a much better fish than plaice, although not so good as sole nor so sweet as the dab.” R. Couch says, “it is but little esteemed as food ;” and Cornish, that it is a very excellent fish. Its body is rather thicker than the common dab, and Yarrell considered its flesh equally good, while Parnell says, some people reject it because it possesses a strong disagreeable tarry flavour, while others believe no flat-fish surpasses it _ In excellence, the flesh being firm and well tasted. The difference depends upon the period of the year when captured, it being good during December, January and February, and unwholesome during April, May and June. Habitat—¥rom Iceland and the northern coast of Europe to the British Isles and French coast. It has likewise been captured off Kamstchatka (Steindachner). In the Orkneys and Zetland Dr. Duguid obtained one in August, 1848, and Mr. Iverach in July: Moray Firth (Harrison) : Banff, not very common (Edward): Aberdeen (Sim): St Andrew’s, common (McIntosh) : Seton Sands and Aberlady Bay (Neill): during February, March and April, off the Fifeshire coast: Firth of Forth, not common, but mostly seen in spring months (Parnell) : Berwick, not common (Johnston): Yorkshire, resident and common (Yorkshire Vertebrata) : Norfolk (Lowe): Sussex coast (Yarrell): Devonshire (Montagu) : Weymouth, several (Gosse), Cornwall, rather rare (Couch), but I found it to be common: also Brixham and Sussex coast, where it is in season during the antumn 30 ANACANTHINI. and winter months. At Plymouth itis known as “merry sole :” at Hove, as “ the kit: at Penzance, as “the queen” or “queen fish” (Pennant): South Wales (Donovan) : Swansea (Dillwyn). Treland.—“ Occasionally taken around the coast, but not in large numbers in any part of it”’ (Thompson), and at all seasons. Portrush, county Antrim, “ not uncommon, as several specimens may almost always be picked out of a night’s trawling” (Ogilby, Zool. 1876, p. 4755) : the largest example measured 17 inches (Ogilby). The example figured, 12 inches long, was from Brixham. 2.—WNo spine before anal fin. 3. Pleuronectes cynoglossus, Plate CIII. Pleuronectus, sp. Gronov, Mus. Ich. i, p. 14, no. 39 (diagn. and synon. exclu.) and ii, p. 11, no. 39, and Act. Helv. iv, p. 263, no. 145 and Zooph. p. 74, no. 252. Craig-fluke, Parnell, Edin. New Phil. Journ. 1835, p. 210. Pleuronectes cynoglossus, Linn. Syst. Nat. 1, p. 456; Bonn. Atl. Ich. p. 74; Gmel. Linn. p. 1228; Fries, Wiegm. Arch. 1840, p. 19; Nilss. Skand. Faun. iv, p. 263; Gronov. ed. Gray, p. 88; Giinther, Catal. iv, p. 449; Collett, p. 147; Malm, p. 527; Winther, Ich. Dan. Mar. p. 40; Goode and Bean, Pro. U.S. Nat. Mussa, psd: Pleuronectes saxicola, Faber, Isis, 1828, p. 877. Pleuronectes nigromanus, Nilss. Prod. Scand. iv, p. 55; Cuyv. Reg. Anim. III. Poiss. pl. evil. Glyptocephalus saxicola, Gotts. Wiegm. Arch. 1835, p. 156. Platessa pola, Cuv. Reg. Anim.; Jenyns, Manual, p. 458; Parnell, Wern. Mem. vii, p. 370, t. xxxvui, and Fish. Firth of Forth, p. 210, t. xxxviii; Bonap. Wiegm. Arch. 1835, p. 157; Thompson, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1837, p. 58, and An. Nat. Hist. 1838, p. 16, and Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p. 196; Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (Hd. 1) ii, p. 227, ¢. fig. (Hd. 2) ii, p. 315 (Hd. 3) i, p. 616; White, Catal. p. 99. Platessa saxicola, Kroyer, Dan. Fiske. 11, p. 338, c. fig. Platessa elongata, Yarrell, Supp. Brit. Fish. and (Hd. 2) u, p. 318, c. fig. (Hd. 3) 1, p. 619; White, Catal. p. 99; Higgins, Zoologist, 1861, p. 7317. Pl eumanasiies elongatus, Ginna Catal. iv, p. 450; Day, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1879, Pp: Woo, pl. Lexi. Platessa cynoglossus, Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 296. Pole and Long-flounder, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, iii, pp. 190, 193, pls. clxxiii and clxxiy. B. v, D. 102-115, P. 10-12, V. 5-6, A. 86-100, C. 18, L. 1. 115. Length of head 6} to 63, of caudal fin 61, height of body 3} to 4 in the total length. Hyes—on the right side, and separated from each other by a very narrow ridge, which is scaleless in small, minutely scaled in large examples: lower eye 1/3 in advance of the upper, and 2 diameters in the postorbital portion of the head. Lower jaw slightly the longer, and with a tubercle below the symphysis. Maxilla 2/3 as long as the orbit, and extending to beneath the front edge of the lower eye. Body very thin, its greatest thickness equalling 1/6 of its greatest height, excluding the vertical fins. Teeth—in a single row, compressed, with their crowns somewhat obtuse: most developed on the blind side. Fins— dorsal commences over the centre of the upper eye, its rays undivided, the longest being at its middle, where they are 3/5 the length of the head: posteriorly it terminates almost close to the root of the caudal fin, which latter is wedge-shaped. Anal similar to the dorsal, but its middle rays not so elongated. A small spine directed anteriorly is situated in front of the base of the anal fin. Both pectorals with 12 rays, the left 1/2 as long as the head, the right 1/4 longer than the left. Ventrals each with 6 rays, and 1/2 as long as the pectorals. Scales—cycloid on the blind side, feebly ctenoid on the coloured: some very fine ones over the fin-rays PLEURONECTIDZ. 31 in adult examples. Lateral-line—with a slightly oblique descent above the pectoral fin, from whence it proceeds direct to the centre of the base of the caudal: it has a dorsal branch on the occiput. Gull-rakers—short, spinate, and widely separated. Cecal-appendages—two, moderately developed. Colowrs—right side brown, with a gray tint, being darkest about the head. A small blackish mark on the upper half of the pectoral fin. Vertical fins of a grayish slate colour, the anterior dorsal rays tipped with white. Left side white. Varieties—Thompson, when examining large numbers of this species, found in one lot the males, in another the females, almost exclusively prevailed : also that the form of the body and the height of the dorsal and anal fins varied considerably in both sexes. Yarrell described P. elongatus from a somewhat elongated specimen, probably a skin, the height of the body in his figure being % of the total length : Couch, who figured from a skin, shows the height of his specimen as about 34 in the total length: whereas mine is 3; from a fresh example. Names.—Pole or craig-fluke, pole-dab. White sole, county Down. La Plie Cynoglosse, French. Habits.—Frequents sandy localities: in some years being much more common than in others. Parnell found small crabs and star-fishes in the stomach of one he examined. Means of capture.—The beam trawl. Breeding.—May and June. As jfood.—Is considered good by some, especially the French, who esteem it to be equal to the sole. In Dublin it is looked upon as very inferior, and Thompson remarks upon having had it dressed, when he found it a passably good fish, but not at all flavoured like, nor equal to, the sole. Habitat—It extends from the coasts of the North Sea around Great Britain and Ireland to the shores of France. It is also found on the North American _ coast (Goode and Bean). Mr. Peace records in Land and Water that an example 193 inches long was taken in Scalpa Bay, near Kirkwall, in May, 1880, and a day or two after another and smaller one, the only ones he had ever heard of in that locality: Banff, rare (Edward): Aberdeen (Sim): Firth of Forth, occasionally obtained during April, May and June. Parnell secured fifteen examples: along the south coast the same author recorded three examples from Brixham, from which locality I received three on January 10th, 1880, and have seen many from there in May, 1881, and also since that date. Mr. Dunn has sent it me from Mevagissey, where it is very rare, and Mr. Cornish considers it rare along the Cornish coast. I have also seen a Plymouth example. Higgins obtained two at Weston-super-Mare, and Mr. Baker two at Stolford, in Somersetshire. In Ireland it is found on the north-east, east, and south-west coasts. On April 26th, 1837, six examples, from 12 to 14¢ inches long, were obtained by Thompson at Belfast, and on March 25th, 1839, about 120 were brought in at one time to the market at Newcastle. They had all been captured by trawling, and about 70 more were said to have been also taken, but this was a quite exceptional take. On May 5th one was captured at Ardglass. The example figured is 9 inches long, and was obtained by Mr. Dunn at Mevagissey, November 6th, 1879. It attains to at least 14 inches in length on the British coast, and Thompson records one 161 inches long from Ireland. B. Lateral-line strongly curved anteriorly. 4, Pleuronectes limanda, Plate CIV. Passer asper, Rondel. xi, c. 9, p. 319; Schoneyv. p. 61; Aldrov. ii, c. 46, p. 242; Willughby, p. 97, t. F. 4; Ray, Syn. p. 32; Rutty, Nat. Hist. County of Dublin, i, p. 350. Limanda, Belon. De Aquat. p. 145; Gesner, pp. 665, 781. Pleuronectes, sp. Artedi, Gen. p. 17, no. 2, Species, p. 58, no. 11, Synon. p. 33, no. 9. Sand- 32 ANACANTHINI. jlynder, Strém, Séndm. i, p. 278. Dab, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (ed. 1776), iti, p. 230 (ed. 1812), i, p. 308. La Limanda, Duhamel, Péches, ix, c.i, p. 267, pl. vi, rep 1s Pleuronectes limanda, Linn. Syst. Nat. i, p. 457; Bl. Fische Dents. ii, p. 45, t. xlvi; Gmel. Linn. p. 1231; Lacép. iv, p. 621; Bl. Schon. p. 145; Bonn. Ene. Ich. p. 75; Quensel, Vet. Akad. Handl. 1806, p. 220; Donovan, Brit. Fish. ii, p. 44; Shaw, Zool. iv, p. 298; Turton, Brit. Fauna, p. 96; Faber in Isis, 1828, p. 881; Fries and Hks. Skand. Fisk. p. 150, pl. xxxiv; Nilss. Skand. Fauna, iv, p. 627; Thompson, Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv. p. 195; H. Malm. Wieem. Arch. 1864, p. 298; Giinther, Catal. iv, p. 446; Schlegel, Dier. Ned. p. 169, pl. xvi, f. 3; Collett, p- 146; Malm, p. 525; McIntosh, Fish. St. Andrew’s, p. 180; Winther, Ich. Dan. Mar. p. 39. Pleuronectes platessoides, Faber, Fische Isl. p. 140 (not Fabr.). Platessa limanda, Flem. Brit. An. p. 198; Jenyns, Man. p. 456; Templeton, Mag. Nat. Hist. 1837 (2), 1, p. 411; Yarrell, Brit. Fishes (Ed. 1), ii, p. 219, ec. fig. (Hd. 2), 11, p. 307 (Hd. 3), 1, p. 628; Kroyer, Dan. Fiske, ii, p. 298; Parnell, Wern. Mem. vii, p. 365, t. xxxvil, and Fish. Firth of Forth, p. 205, pl. xxxvii; Johnston, Berwick. Field Club, 1838, i, p. 174; White, Catal. p. 100; McIntosh, Fish. N. Uist, Pro. R. 8. Edin. v. 1862-66, p. 614. Limanda vulgaris, Gottsche, Wiegm. Arch. 1835, p. 160 ; Moreau, Poiss. France, . 289. P Limanda oceanica, Bonap. Cat. no. 412. Dab, Couch, Fishes of Brit. Isles, iii, p. 185, pl. clzx. B. vii, D. 65-78, P. 10-11, V. 6, A. 50-62, C. 14, L. 1. 86-96, Coee. pyl. 4, Vert. 39-40. Length of head 4 to 5, of caudal fin 52, height of body 22 in the total length. Hyes—the lower slightly anterior to the upper, diameter 53 to 6 in length of the head, 3 to 1 diameter from end of snout, and separated by a narrow osseous ridge. Lower jaw prominent: the maxilla, which is as long as the orbit, extends to beneath the first third of the eye. Teeth—a row of about 22 closely set, lanceolate ones on the blind side. £ins—the dorsal commences above the middle of the upper eye, the rays gradually increase in length to about the centre of their number (37 or 40) when they commence decreasing in height: the fin does not reach the base of the caudal, leaving an uncovered space equal to about 1/2 the height of the free portion of the tail. Pectoral as long as the postorbital portion of the head. Ventral not joined to anal. A small spine, directed forwards, at the commencement * of the anal fin. Caudal slightly rounded. Scales—on coloured side with ctenoid margins, those between the eyes and on the cheeks smaller than those on the body. A row along each dorsal and anal ray. Lateral-line—smooth : at its commencement it has a semi-circular curve above the pectoral fin, while it sends a branch over the occiput. Intestines—three or four short ccecal appendages. Colowrs—Brownish, with some cloudy markings and spots: dorsal and anal fin, with whitish margins. Occasionally white spots are seen on the coloured side of the body. Varieties.—Thompson observed in some examples he took at Ballyhome Bay (co. Down), in September, that they had a few black spots and markings over the body and fins: also at the base of the dorsal fin about six round white spots at regular distances, and about four similar white spots regularly disposed at the base of the anal fin. Names.—Common dab, the term “ dab” is considered to be one of contempt, as in Lincolnshire it refers to an insignificant fellow: sattie, Aberdeen (Sim) : salt- water fluke, Edinburgh: grey fleuk, Moray Firth: grey back, Portrush, co. Antrim (Ogilby). De Schar, Dutch: La Limande, French. 4 Habits—Frequents most sandy localities around the coasts, and Parnell found it in shallow water. It feeds on marine worms and small crustacea. Thompson found in the stomach of one, captured in March, at Belfast, ‘‘ fragments of one of the bivalve shells, solen (neither of the two smaller species), and of corallines, among which Sertularia dichotoma was apparent.” Johnston remarked that off Berwickshire its favourite food appeared to be the pretty Pecten obsoletus. PLEURONECTID A. 33 Means of capture—Beam trawl; seine (Montagu); hand-lines and deep sea lines, being more easily taken by hooks than any other flat fish. Baits.—Marine sandworms and bodies of testaceous molluscs. . Breeding.—April, May and June. Many as small as 13 inches long were received from the mouth of the Thames in November, 1880. As food.—A high flavoured and excellent fish (Thompson), but if waters are muddy the taste partakes of such; it is largely eaten among the poor of London and Paris. It is in the best condition from February to April in some places, from August to December in Cornwall. Habitat—From the shores of northern Europe to those of the British Isles, and extending to the coasts of France, being abundant off Brittany and Poitou, but less common in the Gulf of Gascogne. _ It is found on most parts of the British coasts, being tolerably frequent in the Orkneys and Zetland (Baikie) ; abundant at times in the Moray Firth, also pretty frequent off Banff (Hdward); Aberdeen (Sim); not uncommon at St. Andrew’s (McIntosh) ; common in the Edinburgh market (Neill) ; Berwick (Johnston) ; off Yorkshire it is resident, very abundant, and known as the sand-dab at Redcar (Yorkshire Vertebrata); Yarmouth, Norfolk (Lowe). It is by no means uncommon along the south coast, especially Devonshire (Montagu), and very common off Brixham and Cornwall. In Ireland it is not rare round the coast, and has been recorded from Dublin (Rutty) : Waterford (Smith) : Youghal (Ball) : Galway coast (McCalla) : county Down (Thompson): Belfast and Strangford Loughs (Thompson): while at Portrush, county Antrim, it is the most frequent kind brought up by the trawl, rarely, however, exceeding 12 inches in length (Ogilby). The example figured, 10 inches long, was from the south-west coast. It has been recorded off the British Isles, by Parnell, up to 15 inches in length. B. Teeth conical. a. Lateral-line with a slight curve anteriorly. 5. Pleuronectes flesus, Plate CV. Passer fluviatilis vulgo flesus, Belon. p. 144; Willughby, p. 98, t. F 5; Ray, p- 32; Rutty, co. Dublin, p. 350. Passeris tertia species, Rondel. xi, c. 10, p. 319 ; Gesner, pp. 666, 782, 788. Pleuronectes, Artedi, Synon. p. 31, no. 2, and Gen. p. 17, no. 4, and Spec. no. 4; Gronoy. Zooph. no. 248. Passer, sp. Klein, Pisc. Miss. iv, p. 33, no. 1, t. 11, f. 4, t. vii. f. 1. #let, Duhamel, ix, p. 273, pl. vii, f.2. The flounder, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (Hd. 1776) iii, p. 229 (Kd. 1812) iii, p. 805; Low, Faun. Orcad. p. 212. Pleuronectes flesus, Linn. Syst. Nat. i, p. 457; BI. Fische Deuts. p. 39, t. xliv ; Bonn. Ency. Ich. p. 75, t. xl, fig. 159; Bl. Schn. p. 146; Gmel. Linn. p. 1229; Lacép. iv, p. 683; Donovan, Brit. Fish. iv, pl. xciv; Shaw, Gen. Zool. iv, p. 301; Turton, Brit. Faun. p. 96; Faber, Fische Isl. p. 144, and Isis, 1828, p. 873; Ekstr. Fische Moérké, p. 247; Pallas, Zoog. Rus.-As. iii, p. 422; Nilsson, Skan. Faun. iv, p. 618; Gronov. ed. Gray, p. 88; Giinther, Catal. iv, p. 450; Schlegel, Dier. Ned. p. 168, pl. xvi, f. 2; McIntosh, Fish. N. Uist, P. R.S. Edin. v, 1862-66, p- 614 and Fish. St. Andrew’s, p. 180; Collett, p. 146; Malm, p. 530; Winther, p- 41. Platessa flesus, Flem. Brit. Anim. p. 198; Bowdich, Brit. F. W. Fish, no. 25; Jenyns, Man. p. 455; Gottsche, Wiegm. Arch. 1835, p. 146; Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (ed. 1) ii, p. 215, c. fig. (ed. 2) ii. p. 803 (ed. 3) i, p. 612; Parn. Wern. Mem. vii, p. 363, pl. xxxvii; Templeton, Mag. Nat. Hist. 1837 (2) i, p. 411; Johnston, Berwick. Nat. Club, 1838, i, p. 174; Bonap. Pesc. Eur. 48; Thompson, Nat. Hist. lreland, iv, p. 194; Siebold, Siisswass. fische Mittleurope, p. 77; Kréyer, Dan. Fiske, ii, p. 276, c. fig.; White, Catal. p. 98; H. Malmgren, Wiegm. Arch, 1864, p- 293; Blanchard, Poiss. France, p. 267, c. fig. Z II 34 ANACANTHINI. Varieties in colour. Pleuronectes passer, Linn. Syst. Nat. i, p. 459; Bloch, 1. c. p. 57, t. 1. Pleuronectes roseus, Shaw, Nat. Misc. vii, p. 238, and Gen. Zool. iv, p. 302, pl. 43.* Platessa carnaria, Brown, Edin. Journ. of Nat. and Geol. ii, p. 99, t. ii. Platessa flesus, var. marmorata, Nord. in Demid. Voy. Russ. Pisce. pl. xxviii, Eat Flesus vulgaris, Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 299. Varieties in form. Platessa flesus, Thompson, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1837, p. 60, and Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1865 (8), xv, p. 361, pl. xviii. Flounder, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, 111, p. 195, pl. elxxv. B.v, D. 60-62, P. 10, V. 6, A. 39-45, C. 14, L. 1. 85, Coc. pyl. 2, Vert. 12/23-24. Length of head 4, of caudal fin 52, height of body 23 in the total length. Hyes—less than 1 diameter apart, and the lower slightly in advance of the upper. The eyes are so prominent that they are capable of observing objects on both sides of the head. Lower jaw in advance of the upper. The length of the maxilla equals about 1/4 that of the head, but does not reach to beneath the eyes. Anterior nostril tubular, having a small opening: posterior one oval with wide lips. An obtuse ridge passes from the interorbital space to the lateral-line. Teeth— conical, blunted, two rows in the upper and one in the lower jaw: the outer row on the upper jaw of the blind side consists of 15 teeth; the corresponding row in the lower jaw of about 17. Fins—dorsal commences opposite the middle of the upper eye, its longest rays are in the posterior half of the body. Pectorals on the two sides similar, and about 1/4 as long as the head. Ventrals free. A strong spine, pointing forwards, exists before the base of the anal fin, which latter is similar to the dorsal. Caudal cut square. Scales—small, cycloid: rudimentary ones on the cheeks. A rounded and rough tubercle between the bases of the dorsal and anal rays. Lateral-line—commencing opposite the angle of the mouth, curves round the lower eye, and having joined the interorbital ridge, is continued to the centre of the base of the caudal fin. Ccecal pylori short. Colowrs—vary very considerably, and depend upon that of the ground of the locality which they inhabit, but even then scarcely two will be found to be exactly similar. The colour of the upper side is generally olivaceous-brown, with or without darker blotches. Occasionally examples are very dark, when they are termed sea- flounders. The under surface is white. Young plaice and flounders of equal size may be distinguished, prior to the appearance of tubercles along the bases of the dorsal and anal rays of the latter, by the plaice having distinct scales, whereas they are rudimentary in the flounder. Pleuronectes flesus, P. luscus, and P. Italicus are considered one species by Steindachner (Sitz. Ak. Wiss. Wien. 1868, lvii, p. 719). Varieties in colour.—Double examples or such as are coloured on both sides are not uncommon: also reversed ones. These last the fishermen persuaded Donovan were a distinction of sex : Linnzeus, Bloch, &c., considered such to be distinct species. Some are partially or entirely albinos. Newman (Zool. xii, 1855, p. 4596) records an albino-flounder with red eyes. ‘In 1862 an albino variety was brought to me. Both sides were white, and the fins and eyes pink” (Lowe, Norfolk Faun.). In some there are orange spots somewhat similar but usually less vivid than seen in the plaice. On February 22nd, 1882, I obtained a number from Brixham all having orange spots similar to the plaice, and was informed that this is an appearance peculiar to spring-time. Thompson observes that the examples he examined thus marked were taken in March. Some are of a rosy hue, termed Pleuronectes roseus (Shaw): or of a flesh-red, with irregularly but distantly placed dark-coloured spots, Platessa carnaria (Brown). Higgins (Zool. xiii, 1855, p. 4596) remarks on one he terms Platessa melanogaster, notched above PLEURONECTID A, 35 the eyes and of a very dark brown colour almost black on both sides. Newman (1. c. p. 4914) continues that it is a favourite trick of the fisher boys to cut a notch in the place indicated when they catch a flounder too small to be saleable. As the notch heals the edges recede, so the dorsal fin appears to commence further back than is normally the case. Whether this is the explanation of all such varieties is questionable, as it may be due to an arrest of development as observed in the plaice, turbot, &c. Thompson (Proc. Zool. Soc. 1837, p. 60) refers to the malformed head of one resembling Yarrell’s brill. Names.—Flounder and mud-flownder: flounder lantern, Cornwall: fresh-water fleuk and bigger fleuk, Moray Firth: mayock fleuk, Edinburgh: jleuk, Northumber- land, also flewke and fluck: butt, Yarmouth: sea bague, Isle of Man (Crellin) : black back, Belfast Bay. De Bot, Dutch. Le Flet commun, French. Habits—It is found round our coasts ascending rivers to far above tidal influence, and is able to live in very impure water. There is not much to say of its habits. Its name flounder has heen asserted to be derived from the Swedish word Flundra, denoting its swimming close to the round, Here it buries itself in the sand or soil by working down first one side of the body and then the other, and thus its back becomes covered, while its elevated eyes and mouth remain clear for the purpose of seeing and capturing its prey- In some rivers it is found among stones, or on the side of sandy banks in mid-stream ; but muddy holes are reputed not to be the places where it usually resorts. It will wriggle itself up the sides of posts when under the water, as may be seen any day at the Westminster Aquarium, and it retains its hold by means of its vertical fins. It is a greedy and voracious feeder, eating worms, slugs, crabs, young fish, and animal substances. Thompson found in one he examined at Belfast, the remains of Rissoa wlve, and Johnston off Berwickshire obtained from them Pecten obsoletus. That this fish ascends into fresh water is very certain. If we turn to Belonius, De Aquatilibus, published in 1553, we find the flounder described as Passer fluviatilis, vulgo flesus. It is said by Bloch and others that this name was given owing to its colour being similar to that of a sparrow, and because it inhabited rivers. The flounder is found in the sea and at the mouths of all the larger rivers round our coasts, and is common in the North Sea and Baltic. Donovan observed that it inhabits both salt and fresh waters: Montagu that it is taken in the Avon to within three miles of Bath: Yarrell that it exists in the Thames as high as Sunbury: Parnell that it ascends rivers to a considerable distance, particularly when the waters are discoloured and increased in size by heavy rains. Personally I have a recollection of taking flounders with a worm, about thirty years since, from the Severn at Shrewsbury, a little above the English Bridge. Mr. Henry Shaw, the well-known naturalist of that town, observes: “ Flounders were caught thirty-five or forty years ago about Shrewsbury, and a long way above, in considerable numbers: but since the weirs about Worcester and Gloucester have been made, their ascent has been stopped. The Peplows (fishermen) used to lay what they termed sprigtail lines for them, in the early spring months, on the sandy places they frequented. This sprigtail consisted of a crooked pin with a double bend, having the form of two knees; to this was affixed about four horse hairs, and baited with part of aworm. The flounder swallowed it, and, as soon as he began to pull, the pin became crosswise. They used to employ two to three hundred at a time on a long line, and lay them at night time.” Were the weirs on the Severn destroyed, they would immediately remount that river at least to as high as Shrewsbury. Means of captwre.—Low observes that in the shallower parts of the loch of Stenness he has seen vast numbers taken with a seine net. Thompson mentions haying observed a fisherman at the mouth of the Bann using an implement as follows :—it was in the form of two sides of a garden reel with a spike which was stuck into the ground: to this about forty yards of line were attached, having a very heavy sinker at its extremity, and hooks along its whole length, which were baited with pieces of crab. By flinging out the sinker the line became carried into the water its entire length. : 3% 36 ANACANTHINI. In November, 1862, flounders at Gothenburg and its vicinity were so abundant after a severe storm on the coast of Denmark that although 2} millions were captured the sea literally remained full of them: 500 men were engaged day and night in this capture and at last they were unable to salt such a number. Pontoppidan relates that when the fishermen row their boats over sandy ground where the flounders are seen in clear weather lying in heaps together, they drop a line with a heavy lead to it under which a little lance is fixed, which by the weight of the lead sticks into the flounder, and it is pulled up with the line. Baits.—The angler finds a well-scoured lobworm much approved of, but they - will also take a piece of fish; the novice has to be warned not to strike too soon, as the worm is sucked in some little time prior to its being gorged, while, owing to the size of the fish’s mouth, a small hook has to be employed. In some localities it is found to bite best in the early morning. It lives long after removal from its native element, being very tenacious of life. This makes its carriage and transference to distant places easy. Breeding.—It spawns from February to about April or even later. At Mevagissey numerous young were observed in April. Harmer recorded finding 1,357,400 eggs in one 247 oz. in weight: 351,026 im a second of 62 02. : 225,568 in a third of 33 0z.: and 133 407 in a fourth of 24 oz. Ife history —The development of the eyes of these fishes and the changes the young undergo has been referred to at page 3. Diseases.—Lowe mentions having frequently seen specimens from the Ouse “affected with a peculiar skin disease resembling epithelioma—large fungous growths cropping out over the whole body—the granulations large and roe-like —under the microscope consisting of large nucleated cells.” This fish is largely eaten by the cormorant and other birds. Uses —In Norfolk it is fished for in order to be used as a bait for the lobster fishery (Lubbock). As food.—-It is watery, poor eating, and inferior to the plaice, both as to flavour and size; but authors are not agreed as to whether the marine or river forms are the best for the table, while it has been stated to be equally good from both localities, the flavour depending on the food it has been living on. It is considered nutritive and easy of digestion. Lacépéde observes that its flesh is softest in the fresh-water examples, due to their more rapid growth. In this country such as come from the Thames are generally deemed firmest, and superior to those from any other river. Memel, in the Baltic, has long been celebrated for its flounders. The Frieslanders esteem this fish so much that they naturalize it in fishponds. Thompson observes that is is not much esteemed at Belfast. Low considered that if fried it is delicate eating. Habitat.—From the coasts of northern Europe to those of the British Isles, while off France it is common in the Channel and along Brittany, Poitou, the Gulf of Gascogne and Arachon (Moreau). This fish is abundant around the British coast and is especially partial to the mouths of large muddy creeks: when not impeded by artificial or natural obstructions it ascends rivers long distances. It inhabits all the bays and creeks of the Orkneys, especially if the ground is flat and sandy : abundant in the Moray Firth, ascending the Lossie nearly as high as Elgin (Gordon) : is pretty frequent off Banff (Edward): Aberdeen (Sim) : ae at St. Andrew’s (McIntosh) : during July and August captured in large numbers in the Firth of Forth in the salmon nets particularly above Queensferry, as well as in Leith harbour with the hook (Parnell) : Berwick, common (Yarrell): resident in Yorkshire along the coast and rivers, in which ‘its ascent is mostly stopped by weirs: every year in the Ribble from May to September: common in the Norfolk estuary: down. the east and along the south-west coast and Bristol Channel: common round the coast of Ireland (Thompson). It attains to about 8 or 9 inches in length and 41b. weight. Donovan recorded one 431b. and Pennant another of 6 lb. PLEURONECTIDZ. 37 Genus VII—Sotza (Klein) Cuvier, Monochir, Cuvier. Monochirus, Yarrell. Cleft of mouth narrow, twisted round to the left side. Hyes on the right side, the upper being partially or entirely in advance of the lower. Nostrils variously formed. Dentition most developed on the blind side, where the teeth in the jaws are im villiform rows, none on the vomer or palate. The dorsal fin commences on the snout, and is not confluent with the caudal: pectorals present or absent. Scales small, ctenoid. Lateral-line straight. This genus has been subdivided :— A. Pectorals developed, Microbuglossus. a. Nostrils on blind side not dilated, Solea. b. One of the nostrils on the blind side dilated and broadly fringed, Pegusa. B. Pectorals on both sides rudimentary or small, Buglossus. C. Pectorals absent, Aseraggodes. Geographical distribution —All temperate as well as tropical seas, except the southern portion of the south temperate zone, and though normally a marine and littoral form, still some enter fresh waters in which they have been acclimatized, and thriven. On retaining some in fresh and others of a like weight in saline water, the first at the end of a year were found to have increased at twice the rapidity of those which were kept in salt water. Among the flat-fishes annually captured around the British coast, none exceed the sole in value as food, while they are esteemed both by rich and poor. Their yalue is often enhanced by the locality they come from, thus Torbay, Folkestone and other places are more or less famed for the quality of the fish which are taken from their waters. A most important subject, and one which deserves a more searching investigation than it has yet received, is whether the fish are decreasing in quantity around our coasts, and, if so, the reason? ‘To illustrate one side of this question I give an extract from a letter from an east coast fisherman which speaks for itself :—‘‘ It is well known among fishermen that there is a falling off in the supply of plaice and soles to an alarming extent, whatever may have been said to the contrary by smack-owners and fish salesmen. To explain this, I shall have to earry you back to the time when we first went to fish off the Sylt, about ten years ago; at which time very nearly all the ground from Horn Reef to Heligoland was covered, as it were, with shoals of small plaice, and intermixed with these plaice were a good many soles, both large and small. We have got as many as eighty baskets of small plaice and ten baskets of soles for one night when we first went there, and very nearly all the plaice would be thrown overboard, and you may be aware that they always die after they have been hove on board a trawler. These fish are so small that I have counted two hundred and fifty in one basket, such as we use at Grimsby. The small plaice that are brought to London market are the largest picked out, and then the others are thrown away. Now, we have fished there every summer, heaving big bags of small plaice on board and throwing them away for the sake of the soles, till by destroying the young brood, full-grown plaice have grown very scarce. At the present time very small plaice will sell well, so that now the soles have grown scarce off the Sylt, the small plaice, being saleable, make up, so you see they are bound to be caught unless stringent measures are taken for their preservation. You must remember that the quantity has decreased during these last few years, twenty baskets being the most 38 ANACANTHINI. you would get for a night now. My opinion of the matter is this, that as the ground from Horn Reef to Langeroog, within a less depth than twelve fathoms, is a natural nursery for young brood, if the wanton destruction of it continues as ib has done, we shall soon find it extremely difficult to find even a moderate supply of full-grown plaice, but if stopped I have no doubt that both they and soles would be more plentiful. It is to the interest and benefit of everyone in the fish trade that no English trawler should be permitted to fish within the above depth.” Mr. Mann, writing from Bournemouth to the Field, in April, 1882, observed, ‘“‘T have just weighed a sole of one ounce, and a turbot of four ounces which were exposed for sale here. They were selected from many others of lke size. Sixteen pounds’ weight were captured on one occasion, the largest not exceeding eight ounces. The bulk were taken in long-shore nets, known as ‘tucks,’ of small mesh, from which nothing can escape; but this form of net does not kill the fish, which ought to be at once returned to its native element.” Small turbots and soles are often placed in the bottom of the pads and boxes sent to the London markets, but the bulk of them are sold in the towns and villages along the sea coast. It has again and again been brought prominently to notice, especially about the fishing grounds of the North Sea, that the supply of soles taken in British waters is yearly decreasing as evidenced by the trawlers having to go further out to sea, that an increased number of vessels capture only an amount similar to what formerly were obtained by fewer boats manned with less hands, and likewise that the fish supplied to the markets consists of such as are much smaller than used to be the case. Mr. H. Jex, of Billingsgate, remarked (January 7th, 1882), ‘‘ there have been during the past year some thousands of boxes of soles in this market from Yarmouth, Lowestoft and Ramsgate, while not more than one-fourth of the contents of each box consisted of fish that ought to have been caught—three-fourths of each box nothing but slips and tongues.” When at Weston-super-Mare in 1879 some new trawling ground was tried, and the large size and quantity of these fishes that were taken amply recompensed the trawlers. But such localities are often over-fished and soon become exhausted and thus quantity has to be made up by those of a smaller size. This is possibly what is found to occur in most places. Thus, Mr. Dunn observes, that his father was the first fisherman who employed a beam trawl in Mevagissey Bay : he captured enormous numbers of fish, so much so that he kept a record, which has, unfortunately, been lost. When the Plymouth trawlers first commenced their operations in new localities off the south-west coast (which was about the time the Californian gold-fields were discovered), they termed their new grounds ** California,” as illustrating the amount and value of their captures. It has been pointed out by Mr. Epton and others, that a large fleet of smacks towing over the same ground will in a short time clear off the fish which are there. But the main cause of the diminution in the North Sea is generally asserted to be due to the rfumbers of undersized fish which are wantonly destroyed in shallow water, or their natural brood-grounds by trawling smacks, steam trawlers and shrimp catchers, more especially by smacks along the German coast during the spring and summer months. But while it has been proposed to legislate for this state of affairs by prohibiting the exposure for sale of soles under 6 inches (7 inches, Buckland) in length a difficulty arises which would first have to be investigated. Thus at certain seasons the “ thick-backed sole,” Solea variegata, which rarely exceeds 61 inches in length, is common in the Plymouth markets, and perhaps finds its way to London; while the “little sole,” Solea lutea, abounds along the south- west coast, and is generally thrown overboard as useless, or sold as manure. Any prohibition against the capture of soles under a certain size would cause taking these forms to be penal. This opens up the question—what, if these small forms alone are permitted to increase off the south-west coast, will be the effect on the food of the Plewronectide in general? For should the useless forms be protected and if they live on the same diet as the useful table sole, it appears as if such legislation might cause more injury than benefit to the fisheries. PLEURONECTIDA. 39 Synopsis of Species. A. Pectoral fins developed on both sides. a. Nostrils on the blind side not dilated. 1. Solea vulgaris, D. 73-86, A. 61-73, L. 1. 160. b. One of the nostrils on the blind side dilated and fringed. 2. Solea impar, D. 82-88, A. 67-71, L. 1. 130-140. B. Pectoral fins on both sides very small. 3. Solea variegata, D. 65-72, A. 53-57, L. 1. 85. 4. Solea lutea, D. 65-72, A. 50-56, L. 1. 72. A. Pectoral fins developed on both sides. a. Nostrils on the blind side not dilated. 1. Solea vulgaris, Plate CVI. Solea, Ovid, v. 124; Pliny, ix, c.16; Klein, Pisc. Miss. iv, p. 31, no. 1, and p- 32, no, 2, tab. u, f. 3. Buglossus seu Solea, Belonius, De Aquat. p. 145; Rondel. xi, c. 11, p. 320; Gesner, Aquat. iv, pp. 666, 671, and Icon. Aquat. p. 101; Schoney. p. 63; Aldroy. ii, c. 43, p. 235; Jonston, i, tit. 3, c. 2, a. 2, punct. 1, p- 82; Willughby, Hist. Pisce. p. 100, t. F7; Ray, p. 33. Pleuronectes, sp. Artedi, Synon. p. 32, no. 8, Genera, p. 18, no. 6, and Species, p. 60, no. 5; Gronov. Zooph. no. 251 and Mus. i, p. 14. The Sole, Borlase, Cornwall, p. 266, pl. xxvi, f. 2; Pennant, Brit. Zool. (Hd. 1776) ii, p. 231, and (Hd. 1812) im, p. 311; Low, Fauna Orcad. p. 213; Couch, Fishes of the British Islands, iii, p. 200, pl. clxxvi. La Sole Duhamel, iii, sect. 9, p. 257, pl. i. Pleuronectes solea, Linn. Syst. Nat. i, p. 457; Brunn. Ich. Mass. p. 34; Bloch, ‘Fische Deuts. i, p. 42, t. xlv; Bl. Schn. p. 146; Bonn. Ency. Ich. p. 76, p. xli, f. 160; Lacépéde, iv, p. 623; Donovan, Brit. Fishes, ui, pl. xii; Shaw, Zool. iv, p- 3802; Turton, Brit. Fauna, p. 96; Fries and Ekstrom, Skand. Fisk, p. 165, t. xxxix; Gronov. ed. Gray, p. 89. Solea vulgaris, Quensel, Vet. Akad. Handl. 1806, p. 230; Risso, Eur. Mérid. ul, p. 247; Fleming, Brit. Anim. p. 197; Nilss. Skand. Fauna, Fisk. p. 651; Holb. Gotheb. Vet. Sallsk. Handl. iv, p. 56, c. fig.; Gottsche, Wiegm. Arch. 1835, p- 182; Jenyns, Brit. Vert. p. 466; Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (ed. 1) il, p. 256, ce. fig. (ed. 2) u, p. 347 (ed. 3) 1, p. 657; Parnell, Wern. Mem. vu, p. 378, and Fish. Firth of Forth, p. 218; Bonap. Fauna Ital. Icon. p. 26, c. fig.; Templeton, Mag. Nat. Hist. 1837 (2) i, p. 412; Costa, Faun. Nap. ui, p. 34; Canest. Arch. Zool. v, p- 41, t. iv, f.2; Johnston, Berwick. N. Hist. Club, 1838, i, p. 174; Swainson, Fishes, ii, p. 303; Kroyer, Dan. Fiske, ii, p. 467, c. fig.; White, Catal. Brit. Fish. p- 105; Thompson, Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p. 205; Nilss. Skand. Fauna, iv, p. 651; Schlegel, Dieren. Neder. p. 175, pl. xiv, f. 5; Giinther, Catal.iv, p. 463; T. Ogilby, Zoologist, 1876, p. 4755; Steind. Ich. Span. u. Port. 1868, p. 54; McIntosh, Fish. St. Andrew’s, p. 180; Collett, p. 148; Winther, Ich. Dan. Mar. p. 41; Giglioli, Pesce. Ital. p. 389 ; Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 304. Solea buglossa, Rafin. Indice, sp. 45. _Solea linnei, Malm, p. 532. B. vii, D. 73-86 (97), P. 7, V. 5-6, A. 61-73 (83), C. 16, L. 1. 160, Vert. 9/39-40. 40 ANACANTHINI. Length of head 5% to 53, of caudal fin 71 to 8, height of body 3 to 3} in the total length. Hyes—the upper slightly in advance of the lower: interorbital space somewhat concave and exceeding 1 diameter of the eye in width. Jaws of about the same length in front. Cleft of the mouth extends to beneath the middle of the lower eye. Some short filaments on the snout and on the blind side of the head. Nostrils—on coloured side just in front of lower eye, the posterior one patent with a thick lip on the upper side: the anterior one tubular. On the blind side the anterior nostril is above the centre of the upper lip and scarcely tubular: the posterior nostril is as far behind the anterior as the latter is from the end of the snout, it is patent with slightly elevated edges. Teeth—small, but distinct on the blind side. Gull-rakers—rudimentary. Fins—the dorsal commences in front of the upper eye. The two pectorals of the same size, and 23,in the length of the head. Ventrals free. Caudal rounded. Scales—ctenoid, and continued on to the fin-rays. Lateral-line—straight. Colours —brown or gray on the coloured side, frequently blotched with black. Vertical fins with a narrow, white, outer edge. Pectoral usually with a black blotch in its outer half, which is very distinct in the young. ‘The colour of the sole depends upon and varies according to the quality and depth of the feeding ground: (at Weymouth) there are four prevailing varieties :—(1) a dark sole; (2) a shrub sole, from the markings on the back having the appearance of shrubs; (3) a lemon sole; and (4) a spotted sole. No. 1 is, I believe, caught in the shallowest water ; no. 2 next; and nos. 3 and 4 in the deepest water.” (W. Thompson, Zool. 1851, . 3375.) : Steindachner l.c. observes that Solea azevia, Capello, from Portugal, is this species. Varieties.—M. Capello states that examples from the coasts of Portugal vary in ‘the number of their fin rays from D. 85-95, A. 74-78 (Journ. Sc. Matt. phys. e. nat. Lisbon, no. ii, 1867, p. 164). Near the mouth of the Ouse a variety is taken termed cardine, its head is large and elongated, but its flesh is rather coarse. Reversed examples are not rare (I obtained one from Brixham 14 inches long in January, 1881), neither are double ones or such as are coloured on both sides. On February 11th, 1881, I obtained from Brixham a double sole 114 inches in length, with the eyes placed as normally in this species. There are also semi-albino or piebald specimens. Thompson observes that those from the north of Ireland vary considerably in form and colour, some being narrower than others, and tapering more towards the tail. I obtained an example 12 inches long from Brixham in which the caudal fin had been lost, and a new one formed continuous with the dorsal and anal. Names.—Sole, as the Greeks considered it would form a fit sandal for an ocean nymph: slips, or tongues, the market terms for the young: also tonque-soles in the Moray Firth, and lobsters in Suffolk. La sole commune, French. De Tong, Dutch. Habits.— Appears to prefer sandy or gravelly shores, and is retentive of life, but rather uncertain in its migrations, for although mostly appearing at certain. spots almost at a given time, and usually decreasing in numbers by degrees: in other seasons they disappear at once as suddenly as they arrived. ‘‘'The finest soles have been taken,” observes Andrews (Zool. 1853, p. 3848), “in the Arun River, miles above the tideway, and where they breed and remain throughout the year.” “In the estuary of the Humber,” observes Mr. Eagle Clarke, “‘ they are captured from May until August inclusive, all are either in spawn or shotten. The young are very numerous in the shallow water at the edge of the tides.” Yarrell, on the authority of a correspondent, remarks that they breed in the River Arun, frequenting it from the mouth five miles upwards, which is nearly to the town of Arundel, and remain in it the whole year, burying themselves in the sand during the cold months. It is not unusual for them to ascend rivers to some distance, while they will live and thrive in fresh water. Along our sea-coasts they retire to the deep as frosts set in, revisiting the shallows about May if the weather is warm, their migrations being influenced by temperature. Although very large examples are occasionally taken in Lynn Deeps this fish, similar to the whiting, only attains about 2/3 the size off Norfolk and Suffolk that it does off Devonshire. PLEURONECTIDA. 41 In Ireland (October) Dr. Farran found Cardiwm elongatum abundantly, a few Bulla aperta, and a number of Hchinocyamus pusillus. (November) Amphidesma Boysti, a Dentalium, and a few Amphidesma prismatica. (December) Amphidesma prismatica, a Lysteri, an Anomia, and Donax trunculus. The sole has been reputed to eat the eggs and fry of other fishes and sea urchins, &c. Means of capture-—Generally the trawl. The principal English trawling ground lies from Dover to Devonshire. They may be taken by spillers, but are not commonly captured with hooks: it is suggested that one reason may be that spillers are mostly used by day, whereas the sole is a night feeder. In-shore trawling, shrimping and fine meshed netting during the spring months occasion great injury to the young of these fishes, as-do also hose nets set for shrimps. Mr. Welton, of Bridgewater, purchased all the fish taken in two of these nets in one day, and thus obtained 18 ewt. of the fry of soles, plaice, herrings, whiting, &c. Baits.—Major Holland (Se. Gossip, 1872, p. 261) employs soft- or soldier-crabs, lug-worm, mussel, shrimp and rag-worm, with long gut snoods, but these fish feed mostly at night, and the most favourable time is after a blow, when the water is thick, while a land breeze answers better than a sea breeze. Breeding.—They spawn late in the year and during the spring months. I have obtained them in full roe this year up to April 15th. A sole of 1 1b. weight carries about 134,000 eggs (Buckland). Hermaphrodites.—Have been recorded by Yarrell. Life history—The very young swim on edge as has been already referred to, but they do not appear to be commonly found so far out at sea as some other species. They are first seen along our south coast about the end of March or commencement of April. Diseases—Buckland mentions having received a sole in which its entire lower surface was studded with hairs from 1/8 to 1/2 an inch in length. On a microscopic examination being made they turned out to be the hairs of the “sea mouse,” Aphrodite aculeata. Uses.—The skin of the sole was much used, according to Parnell, for fining coffee, being found a good substitute for isinglass: also as a material for artificial baits. As food.—The flesh of this fish is white, firm, and of excellent flavour, those from the deepest waters being generally preferred: during the time of breeding, and for a short period subsequently, they are soft and watery. Those on the west coast and to the south are larger as a rule than those towards the north of these islands. Mayhew tells us that London requires annually 97,520 soles, while that market is principally supplied from the Norfolk coast and the English Channel. Habitat.—It extends from the seas of Scandinavia and the Baltic southwards, round all the coasts of France, and is found in the Mediterranean. It is taken in the Orkneys and Zetland, but is rare (Baikie): it is not very common off Banff (Edward): but found off Aberdeen (Sim): is common in the Moray Firth, but not much sought after: frequent at St. Andrew’s (McIntosh) : sparingly at the mouth of the Firth of Forth (Parnell). Resident and common off Yorkshire. Has once occurred at Goode, in the estuary of the Humber, near the mouth of the Ouse (Yorkshire Vertebrata): the Great Grimsby fishermen assert that they capture most of their small soles off the Dutch coast. Common in the Norfolk estuary (Lowe): abundant off the south coast from Sussex to Devonshire, and common off Cornwall. Also found in the Bristol Channel, and generally around Great Britain. In Ireland soles occur all round the coast, while Ogilby observes that they are common at Portrush, and Thompson remarks that those in the north vary considerably in form and colour from those more to the south. As to the size it attains Thompson’s largest example was 20 inches in length. Mr. Grove, of Charing Cross, received one from Torbay on February Ist, 1882, 24 inches long, and which weighed 63 1b. A correspondent of the Field alludes to one weighing 7+ lb. captured at Bridgewater, on June 4th, 1881: and casts of a pair from Ireland which weighed together 12 lb. are in the Buckland Museum. Yarrell mentions one 26 inches long and very thick, the largest he had ever heard of, which was brought to the Totness market, and weighed 9 lb. 42 ANACANTHINI. B. One of the nostrils on the blind side dilated and fringed. 2. Solea lascaris, Plate CVILI. Pleuronectes lascaris, Risso, Ich. Nice, p. 311, pl. vii, f. 32. ? Pleuronectes nasutus, Pall. Zoogr. Ross.-As. p. 427. Solea impar, Bennett, Proc. Zool. Soc. i, p. 147; Ginther, Catal. iv, p. 468. Solea lascaris, Risso, Hur. Mérid. iui, p. 249; Bonap. Fauna, Ital. Pesce. ; Canestr. Arch. Zool. i, p. 38, t. iv, f. 1; Giinther, Catal. iv, p. 467; Canestr. Faun. Ital. Pesce. p. 165; Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 307. Solea pegusa, Yarrell, Zool. Journ. iv, pp. 467, 508, pl. xvi, Brit. Fish. (ed. 1) ui, p. 260, c. fig. (ed. 2) ii, p. 851; Jenyns, Man. p. 467; Thompson, Nat. Hist. Treland, iv, p. 206; White, Catal. p. 106 (not Lacép. or Risso). Solea nasuta, Nordm. in Demid. Voy. Russ. Mérid. Zool. iii, Poiss. p. 586, pl. xxx1; Kessler, Bull. Soc. Nat. Mosc. 1859, pt. 11, p. 442; Richardson, in Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (ed. 3) i, p. 662; Steind. Ich. Span. u. Port. 1868, p. 58. Solea aurantiaca, Ginther, Catal. iv, p. 467; Steind. Ich. Span. u. Port. 1868, . 58. 3 Lemon Sole, Couch, Fish. Brit. Is]. i, p. 205, pl. elxxviii. B. vii, D. (65) 82-88, P. 10, V. 5, A. (82) 67-71, C. 15, L. 1. 130-140. Vert. 6. Length of head 53 to 63, of caudal fin 8 to 82, height of body 22 to 22 in the total length. Hyes—the superior 1/2 in advance of the inferior: about 12 diameters from the end of the snout, and about 1 diameter apart. This species is rather thicker than S. vulgaris. Upper jaw slightly longer than the lower but not produced into a lobe. The cleft of the mouth extends to beneath the middle of the lower eye. Some filaments on the snout, very numerous on the blind side of the head and also on the few first dorsal rays. Nostrils on the coloured side tubular, the anterior one being the longer. One of the nostrils on the blind side is nearly circular, very wide, and encircled by short and branched filaments. Teeth—distinct on the blind side. #ims—the dorsal commences in front of the upper eye: most of the fin-rays branched. The two pectoral fins are equally long and 2% in the length of the head. Giull-rakers—absent or exceedingly minute. Scales—ctenoid, continued on to the fin-rays. The mucous membrane of the gullet has longitudinal folds which are continued into the stomach: the intestine beyond the pylorus is wider than the stomach: externally both have several large papille on them. Colowrs—of an orange or lemon yellow, marbled with darker and covered with numerous small black blotches and dots, among which are some light or even white ones. Pectoral fin with a large black blotch, surmounted by a light ring in its posterior half. Vertical fins of the same colour as the body. In some examples the yellow colour is entirely lost after they have been a few weeks in alcohol, leaving the fish gray marbled with darker. Yarrell appears to have been the first British author who distinguished this fish and considered it identical with Plewronectes pegusa (Risso) : Jenyns, however, observed that it is not Risso’s fish, and appears to be undescribed by any foreign authors. Richardson next located it as Plewronectes nasutus (Pallas): while subsequently Dr. Giinther believed it to be undescribed and named it Solea aurantiaca. It seems to be S. lascaris (Risso) as suggested by Moreau, and agrees with S. lascaris (Bonap.) : while Steindachner identifies S. lascaris (Risso) with S. scriba (Val.). Names.—The lemon sole from its colour: sand-sole from the localities it frequents: French sole. Borhame, Northumberland. Le Sole Lascaris, French. Habits.—Frequents sandy bottoms and appears to be captured throughout the year, 2 good number were daily in the Cheltenham fish shops from April until _ December, 1881, and January, 1882. Means of capture.—Usually by the trawl, it has been thought by some authors that it prefers deeper water than the common sole. PLEURONECTID A. 43 As food.—It is not in request for the table, being tasteless and wanting in firmness, but is occasionally slipped in amongst such as have been prepared for filletting at the fishmongers. ; Habitat—From the shores of Great Britain and Ireland, through the Mediterranean, and is found off Nice and Naples (Giglioli). Rare in Banffshire (Edward): Northumberland: resident and not uncommon in Yorkshire (Yorkshire Vertebrata) : found off Sussex. Occasional in Devonshire (Parfitt) : I have seen large numbers from Torbay: Weymouth two examples (Gosse, Zool. 1854) : rare in Cornwall (Cornish): off Somersetshire (Baker): occasionally taken in the weirs at Swansea (Dillwyn). In Ireland numerous examples were captured from one place off Galway in 1848. It attains to 14 inches in length (Buckland); the one figured was from Brixham, and measures 8} inches. B. Pectoral fins on both sides very small. Solea variegata, Plate CVIII, fig. 1. Pole panachée, Duham. iii, sect. 9, p. 259, pl. u, f. 3. Pleuronectes variegatus, Donovan, Brit. Fishes, 1801, pl. exvii. Pleuronectes microchirus, Delaroche, An. Mus. xiii, 1809, p. 356, f. 2. Monochir microchir, Cuv. Regne Anim.; Guichen. Exp. Sc. Algeria, p. 107. Pleuronectes mangilt, Risso, Ich. Nice, 1810, p. 310. Pleuronectes lingula, Hanmer in Pennant, Brit. Zool. (Hd. 1812) i, p. 313, ]. xlviil. F Rhombus mangili, Risso, Hur. Mérid. iui, p. 255. Pleuronectes fasciatus, Nardo Naccari, Giorn. Fis. Pay. in, Adr. Itt. p. 9. Solea mangili, Bonap. Faun. Ital. Pesc. iii, p. 27, c. fig.; Canest. Arch. Zool. i, p. 29, tav. iii, f. 3, Fauna d’Ital. p. 166. Solea lingula, Jenyns, Manual, p. 468. Monochirus lingula, Costa, Faun. Nap. ui, p. 50. Monochirus variegatus, Thompson, An. Nat. Hist. 11, p. 404, and Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, pp. 207-211; Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (ed. 1) ii, p. 262, ¢. fig. (ed. 2) ii, p- 303, c. fig. (ed. 3) 1, p. 664. Microchirus lingula, Bonap. Pesce. Eur. p. 50, no. 429. Monochir variegatus, White, Catal. p. 106. Solea variegata, Flem. Brit. An. p. 197; Scouler, Mag. Nat. Hist. vi. (1833) p- 530; Giinther, Catal. iv, p. 469; Steind. Ich. Span. u. Port. 1868, p. 60; Giglioli, Pesce. Ital. p. 39. Microchirus variegatus, Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 317. Variegated sole, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, 11, p. 203, pl. elxxvii. B. vii, D. 65-74, P. r. 4-5, 1. 2-3, V. 5, A. 55-58, C.15, L. 1. 85-90, Vert. 10/30. Length of head 5+ to 53, of caudal fin 61 to 7, height of body 31 to 31 in the total length. Hyes—on the right side, scarcely half a diameter apart, and 1 diameter from the end of the snout. The upper eye one-half in advance of the lower: interorbital space scaled, anterior nostril tubular. Teeth—very minute. Fins—dorsal commences above the front edge of the upper eye, and nearly reaches the base of the caudal fin, its rays are branched and the highest are opposite the middle of the length of the body. Right pectoral fin very short, not equalling the length of the orbit: left pectoral still more minute. Ventral not attached to anal, which latter fin terminates similarly to the dorsal. Caudal somewhat rounded at its extremity. Scales—ctenoid extending on to the fin rays. Lateral-line—nearly straight. Free portion of the tail about three times as high as long. Colowrs—of a rich chestnut brown with six or seven vertical dark bands which are a little more than one-third the width of the interspace between each. These bands become broken up with advancing age, but may even be seen in large specimens mostly as dark marks at the bases of and passing on to the dorsal and 4A, ANACANTHINI. anal fins, Oaudal with a dark band in its last third, having a light outer edge. Dorsal and anal fins usually edged with white. ; Thompson observes Solea lingula and 8. variegata are brought together as synonymous by Yarrell and Jenyns. “In placing individuals together the most obvious differences appear in the dark blotches and transverse bands of S. variegata contrasted with the comparatively uniform tint of S. lingula: the scales of S. variegata are very much smaller and its eyes being relatively to each other placed more vertically : in the dorsal and anal fins being rather more distant from the caudal fin: and in the general form of the body, which tapers less towards the tail: the rays too of the dorsal and anal fins are considerably fewer in number than in S. lingula.” The Banksian copy of Pennant has the following MS. remark : “‘ This fish is sometimes taken at Torbay in the trawling nets. It differs at first sight from the common sole in the edges of the scales being strongly ciliated, and in wanting the numerous small beards that hang from the lower side of the head of the common sort.” This appears to be the “ red-back ” described from EH. Hanmer’s MS. in the 1812 edition of Pennant (iii, p. 313, pl. xlviii) but there is no reference to this figure (P. Z. 8. 1849, p. 83). Names.—Thickback, Devonshire, so termed owing to its being thicker than the common sole: bastard sole, Weymouth. It was first observed from our coast by Donovan, in April, 1807, when it was brought to Billingsgate market. Habits—On the south coast of Great Britain it appears in the spring and continues through most of the year. Means of capture——Trawling, and is often taken in very great numbers along the south coast. As food.—Largely consumed in Devonshire and Cornwall where it is held in great estimation. Habitat.—From the British coasts to France and the Mediterranean, and common off Italy (Giglioli) : frequent along the coasts of France and extends into the Mediterranean, Trieste (Gigholi). Met with occasionally off Banff (Hdward) : off Rothsay and the Isle of Bute in Scotland (Scouler): in October, 1851, Mr. Hussey (Zool. p. 3282) observed upon many having been captured at Brighton, one pair weighing upwards of 6lb.: but Mr. Thompson (Zool. p. 3375) says they were merely varieties of the common sole, continuing, “the true variegated sole I have never seen exceed 5} inches (French measure) and I have seen twenty pairs at a time and not half-an-inch difference in the whole lot, and many of them had roe. They are called here (Weymouth) ‘bastard soles.’”” During August, 1881, I found they were being landed in thousands at Plymouth from the trawlers and sold as “thickbacks,’’ they had been captured during at least the three previous months. Mr. Dunn, in the last week in February, 1881, forwarded to me one with the information that they were being taken near Plymouth in hundreds, averaging about six to a pound, and were being sold in pads separated from the other soles as offal. In Ireland one was dredged at Belfast, June 16th, 1838, by Mr. Drummond, and in Ventry harbour it is not uncommon (Andrews). The example figured is 6} inches long, and was obtained at Plymouth, it attains to 9 inches in length according to Buckland. 4, Solea lutea, Plate CVIII, fig. 2. Solea parva s. lingula, Rondel. xi, c. 15, p. 324; Gesner, Aquat. 1, lib. iv, p. 669; Aldroy. ii, c. 43, p. 237; Jonston, Pisc. 11, lib. 1, tit. 3, c. 2, a. 2, punct. i, p- 58; Willughby, p. 102, t. F 8, f.1; Klein, Pisc. Miss. iv, p. 32, no. 4. Solonette, Duhamel, iii, sect. 9, p. 258, pl. 11, f. 1, 2. Pleuronectes luteus, Risso, Ich. Nice, p. 312. Rhombus luteus, Risso, Europ. Mérid. iii, p. 257. Monochirus minutus, Parnell, Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, .1837, c. fig. and Mag. Zool. and Bot. i, 1837, p. 527, c. fig. Monochirus linguatulus, Cuy. Regne Anim.; Thompson, Ann. Nat. Hist. 1, PLEURONECTID &. 45 p. 405, and Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p. 206; Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (ed. 2) ii, p. 355, c. fig. (ed. 3) i, p. 666 (not Pl. linguatula, Linn.). Solea lingula, Jenyns, Man. Brit. Vert. p. 468 ; Thompson, Proc. Z. S. 1837, p- 58, and Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p. 206. Pleuronectes trichodactylus, Naccari, Ich. Adri. p. 11. Monochirus luteus, Costa, Faun. Nap. ii, p. 49; Bonap. Catal. no. 428; Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 316, c. fig. Synaptura lingula, Kaup, Wiegm. Arch. 1858, p. 97. Solea lutea, Bonap. Faun. Ital. Pesc. c. fig.; Canest. Arch. Zool. i, p. 32, tay. 3, f. 4, Fauna Ital. p. 167; Giinther, Catal. iv, p. 469; Steind. Ich. Span. u. Port. 1868, p. 60. Denbehir linguatula, Swainson, Fish. ii, p. 303; White, Catal. p. 107. Solea minuta, Ginther, Catal. iv, p. 470; McIntosh, Fish. St. Andrew’s, p. 180; Steind. Ich. Span. u. Port. 1868, p. 61. Solonette, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, ii, p. 207, pl. clxxix. Bevin, 1; 65-72; Pore 5,1. 3, V. 5, A. 50-56, C: 19, Li. 1. 72. Length of head 42 to 42, of caudal fin 6 to 63, height of body 3} in the total length. Hyes—on the right side, rather close together, the upper being one-third in advance of the lower. Cleft of mouth extends to beneath the middle of the lower eye. Anterior nostril tubular. Teeth—pointed and minute. ins—Dorsal commences on the snout before the upper eye and ceases close to the base of the caudal fin, its rays are branched and the highest are opposite the middle of the length of the body. Right pectoral very short, its upper ray twice as long as the others, left pectoral still more minute. Ventral rays two-thirds as long as the first few of the anal fin, which latter terminates similarly to the dorsal. Caudal somewhat rounded at its extremity. Scales—ctenoid extended on to the fin rays. Lateral-line—nearly straight. Colowrs—right side of a stone gray covered with numerous small brown or dark spots, also three or four rows of moderately sized. dark blotches placed very wide asunder, but sometimes entirely wanting. Dorsal and anal fins colourless, but every here and there a ray (from the fourth to the seventh) quite black, portions of others also dark, and some dark spots along the bases of these fins. Caudal spotted. Pectoral with a black blotch in its centre. Some of the specimens described by more than one author as belonging to this species, appear to be small examples of the “‘ variegated sole.” Varieties—If the colours shown in Couch’s figure are correct, are the proportions such as he copied from nature? I think he must have had some other species under his eye than S. minuta. Names.—Inttle sole: Red sole. Le Microchire Jaune, French. Habits.—Appear to resemble those of the “‘ variegated sole.” Means of capture.—Trawling. Uses.—Parfitt observes (Fauna of Devon, p. 28), ‘‘ sometimes taken in large numbers in the trawl nets: but as they are of no use for the market they are thrown again into the sea.” Habitat.—From the shores of Great Britain and Ireland to those of France and through the Mediterranean. Off Banffshire it is more common than the “lemon sole” (Edward): common at St. Andrew’s (McIntosh). Reputed to have been taken at Whitby (Yorkshire Vertebrata): common at Weymouth (P. Gosse): Mr. Cornish records (Zool. 18738, p. 3697) capturing a star-fish in August, holding one of these fishes, three inches in length, in its feelers. An example was captured in November, 1880, ten miles at sea off Mevagissey, and sent to me by Mr. Dunn. In Ireland it is taken on the N.E., E., S. and West coasts. Ball obtained it in Dublin: McCoy observed (Ann. and Mag. 1841, vi, p. 408) that he found it tolerably abundant in the Bay between the lightship and the harbour: McCalla took it in county Down, and Thompson mentions three dredged off Dundrum in the same county. The example figured, life size, came from Mevagissey : the largest specimen I haye obtained is 4¢ inches in length, but it is said to reach to 5 inches. AG PHYSOSTOMI. Orver III—PHYSOSTOMI, Jiller. All the fin rays articulated, with the exception of the first in the dorsal and pectoral, which are frequently more or less ossified (some genera belonging to the family Sternoptychide have a rudimentary first dorsal fin). Ventral fin when present abdominal and spineless. Air-bladder when existing having a pneumatic duct (except in the family Scombresocide),. Famity, I—STERNOPTYCHIDA. Margin of the upper jaw formed partly by the premaxillaries and partly by the maxillaries, both of which are provided with teeth. Opercular bones not fully developed. Gill opening wide: pseudobranchie present or absent. An adipose dorsal fin may be present or rudimentary. Body scaleless or scaled. Rows of round luminous bodies along the lower surface of the abdomen, and occasionally some also on various parts of the body and head. Air-bladder when present, simple. Eggs enclosed in the sac of the ovaries, and excluded by oviducts. These fishes are all of small size and appear to be mostly pelagic, while some may be abyssal forms. This family has been subdivided into three groups by Dr. Giinther, who, however, failed to detect scales in Mawrolicus, in which genus they are present, but deciduous. The divisions would consequently have to be altered as follows: Group A.—Pseudobranchie present: a rudimentary spinous dorsal fin Scaleless. Sternoptychina. 1. Argyropelecus.—A single row of teeth in the jaws. Group B.—Pseudobranchie present: no spinous dorsal fin. Scaled. Coccia. 2. Mawurolicus.—Lower jaw prominent. Group C.—Pseudobranchiez absent : no spinous dorsalfin. Scaled. Chaulzodontina. The two forms of this family, Argyropelecus and Maurolicus, which have been obtained off the coasts of Great Britain and Ireland, in common with some other pelagic forms found elsewhere, possess eye-like spots of a circular form which are either impressions or prominences on the skin. Their uses have been a fertile subject for speculation, and possibly much still remains to be discovered. MacCulloch remarked that considering at a depth of 800 or 1000 feet, the light of the sun ceases to be transmitted in the ocean, it may be that animal luminousness is a substitute for that light, and if so these organs would take the place of minature lanterns. Professor Reinhardt observed of Astronethes Fieldii, Val., which is common in the Atlantic Ocean between 23° and 6° north latitude, that in two instances he captured the fish alive, when he saw that it sent forth two strong and vivid greenish lights, which intermitted momentarily and ceased altogether when the fish died (Zool. 1854, p. 4300). Dr. Guppy (Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. March, 1882, p. 202) remarked that on November 7th, 1881, latitude - STERNOPTYCHID &, A? 35° 17! south, longitude 17° 43' east, two Scopeli were caught; one had some life remaining and displayed a faint, though an undoubted luminosity in the pearly bodies of the pectoral region: direct irritation had no effect. Professor Leuckart, in 1865, suggested whether some at least might not be regarded as accessory organs of sight, a position shown by Leydig to be untenable. In 1879 Dr. Ussow (Bull. Soc. Moscow, liv, 1879, p. 79) of St. Petersburgh, remarked that among these fish belonging to seven genera which he had examined these organs could be arranged in two series: the first he regarded as constituting accessory eyes, the second as special glandular organs. Leydig, in 1881 (Die augen. Organe der Fische, Bonn.), added another group, viz., mother-of-pearl like organs, which are not sensory in function, and he considers they bear the closest resemblance to the electric, or pseudo-electric organs of other fishes, with probably a secondary illuminating function. Group A.—Pseudobranchiw present. A rudimentary spinous dorsal fin. Body scaleless. Genus IJ—ArcyropELecus,* Cocco. Pleurothysis, Lowe. Branchiostegals nine: pseudobranchie present. Head large, it and the trunk elevated and very compressed, the latter passing suddenly into the tail which is narrow. LHyes large, directed upwards and outwards, separated by a very narrow interspace. Oleft of mouth vertical and deep, with the lower jaw prominent. The margin of the upper jaw is formed of the premaxillary and maxillary, which have a single row of fine teeth, a row also in the lower jaw. First dorsal short, preceded by an osseous plate formed from neural spines: adipose dorsal, if present, rudimentary. Pectorals well developed. Ventrals small. Gull-openings wide: gill-rakers long. Body covered with a silvery pigment but no distinct scales. Humeral arch and pubic bones prolonged into flat, pointed processes, which project along the median line of the abdomen, intermediate between which are some scutes. Atr-bladder present. Four pyloric appendages. Examples of this genus are said to have been dredged in the Challenger expedition at 1100 fathoms, a statement upon which discredit has been thrown. In the Mediterranean it would appear not to be found at very great depths, and may be a night feeder, at which time it ascends to the surface as is seen in the Scopelide. Geographical distribution.—Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean. One species has been found off the coast of Norway. 1, Argyropelecus hemigymnus, Plate CIX, fig. 1. Argyropelecus hemigymnus, Cocco, Giorn. Sc. Sic. 1829, fase. lxxvu, p. 146; Bonap. Faun. Ital. Pesc.; Cuv. and Val. xxii, p. 398; Gimnther, Catal. v, p. 385, and Ann. and Mag. (4) 1874, xiii, p. 139; Canestr. Fauna Ital. p. 119; Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 498; Giglioli, Pesc. Ital. p. 39. Sternoptyx Mediterranea, Cocco, Giorn. il Faro, 1838, iv, p. 7, f.2; Bonap. .c. c. fig. Sternoptyx hemigymnus, Cuv. Rég. Anim. Ill. Poiss. pl. ciii, f. 3. B. ix, D. 6+ 7-8, P. 10, V. 6, A. 11-12, C. 19. The greatest height of the body equals half the total length. Posterior to the vent the caudal portion of the body becomes abruptly narrowed, while it is everywhere compressed, its greatest width merely equalling 1/4 of its height. Caudal fin 1/5 of the total length. ZHye—high up, directed outwards and slightly * From some error, Agassiz thought this might be the young of Zeus faber. 48 PHYSOSTOMI. upwards. The interorbital space very narrow, 1 diameter distance from the end of the snout, and a like distance from the posterior end of the head. Posterior inferior angle of preopercle, with two triangular spines, the upper directed backwards, the lower downwards. Cleft of mouth deep, the lower jaw projecting beyond the upper, and the posterior angle of the maxilla armed with a triangular spine. (Gull-rakers—very long. TYeeth—in a single row of somewhat incurved ones, largest in the mandible. Those in the premaxillaries are directed somewhat backwards, as are also a patch in the contiguous and posterior part of the maxilla, but those in the posterior half of this latter bone are directed upwards. Hins—the dorsal consists of two portions, the anterior being prolongations of about 6 neural spines, the last two being the longest and largest, they are connected together by a thin plate: the rayed portion is higher than the first part: a rudimentary adipose dorsal fin is sometimes present. Pectoral rather longer than the head : ventral small, anal somewhat similar to the rayed part of the dorsal : caudal forked. Skin of the body covered with a silvery pigment, while in various places it possesses what have been termed eye-like spots, one anterior to the eye, usually two behind it, six smaller ones on the throat and branchiostegous rays, and six larger ones on the chest and humeral arch: twelve along the pubic plate, and eight on a line a little above this commencing above the axilla, the two anterior of which are the largest. Near the lower edge of the body and behind the ventral fin are four large ones, thé last almost reaching the base of the anal, and six more over the last half of the base of the anal fin. Colowrs—the body brilliant silvery, the tail portion yellowish. A few black spots on the head and an irregular band along the base of the dorsal fin. On the side of the tail above the hind edge of the anal fin are two small silvery spots, with fine black bars radiating from them: a black band at the base of the caudal fin. Asa rule the eye-like spots along the lower edge of the body have a black edge. Habits——Of these but little is known. Breeding. Hgegs large. Habitat.—Atlantic and Mediterranean. An example in the British Museum is stated to have been dredged in 540 fathoms, between Shetland and the Faroe Islands by the Porcupine, along with several other Mediterranean forms in 1869. STERNOPTYCHID. 49 Group B.—Pseudobranchiew present: no spinous dorsal fin. Scaled. Genus II—Mavrouicvus, Cocco. Gonostomus, sp. Cocco. Ichthyococcus, sp. Bonaparte. Branchiostegals eight or nine: pseudobranchice well developed. Body oblong, tt and the head compressed. Cleft of mouth deep and oblique, lower jaw prominent. Mawilla large and wide. Eyes of medium size. Teeth in a single row in the jaws. Gill-opening wide: gill-rakers very long. Dorsal fin in the posterior half of the body, also a rudimentary adipose fin. Pectoral and ventral present. Anal fin long, commencing on a line posterior to the termination of the first dorsal, its last rays are concealed by skin. Caudal forked. Scales very deciduous and large, covering the body: one or two rows of luminous spots along the lower side of the head, body and tail. Ccecal appendages in moderate numbers. These fishes appear to belong to the pelagic fauna, and as a rule are only captured off our shores subsequent to considerable disturbances in the deep sea. During the early part of this year (1882) storms were unusually prevalent, and Mr. Sim obtained from the beach at Aberdeen about 179 examples. As corrobora- tive proof it may be mentioned that T’rachypterus arcticus was thrown on shore on February 16th near Berwick, another on April 17th near Flamborough, and four days subsequently a third at Burghead. On April 15th an example of Regalecus Banksti came ashore in the Firth of Forth, while during the month of April I heard of four specimens of Lemargus borealis being captured, one in the Firth of Forth and the three others off Aberdeen. The largest of the examples of Maurolicus obtained by Mr. Sim in 1881 had fully developed ova, and they may have been approaching the shore for breeding purposes, because all the large examples of the 170 taken at the same period this year show developed ova and milt ready for shedding: or they may have been on the surface of the sea for this purpose, and so come within the influence of storms. Miiller considered the structure of the jaws of this genus Scopeloid, most correctly observing that the premaxillaries reach to the angle of the mouth, and it is only beyond that angle that the toothed maxillary appears. 1. Maurolicus Pennantii, Plate CIX, fig. 2. Sheppy Argentine, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (Hd. 1776) iii, p. 327, pl. lxv (Hd. 1812) iii, p. 432, pl. lxxvi; Low, Fauna Orcad. p. 225. Argentina Pennantii, Walb. Artedi, 1792, iii, p. 47. Argentina sphyrena, Turton, Brit. Fauna, 1807, p. 105; Bonn. Atl. Ich. p. 177, pl. xxiii, f. 301 (not Linn.). Serpe Humbolti, Risso, Ich. Nice, 1810, p. 358, pl. x, f. 38. Scopelus Humbolti, Risso, Hur. Merid. ii, p. 467; Cuv. Régne Anim. t. ii, p. 315; Yarrell, Brit. Fishes (Ed.1) ii, p. 94, c. fig. (Hd. 2) ii, p. 161, and Mag. Nat. Hist. 1838 (2) u, p. 25; Jenyns, Brit. Vert. p. 433; Clarke, Mag. Nat. Hist. 1838 (2) ii, p. 22, c. fig.; De Kay, Fauna New York, Fish. p. 246, pl. xxxviii, f. 121. Scopelus borealis, Nilss. Obs. Ich. p. 9, and Skand. Fauna, Fiske, p. 479; Cuy. and Val. xxii, p. 438; Thompson, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. (2) 1847, p. 171, and Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p. 175; Giinther, Catal. v, p. 389; Collett, Norges Fiske, . 150. 3 Maurolicus amethystino-punctatus, Cocco, Lett. s. Salmon, 1838, p. 32, t. iv. f.12; Bonap. Faun. Ital. Pesce. c. fig.; Giinther, Catal. v, p. 390; Canestr. Faun. Ital. p. 120; Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 509; Giglioli, Catal. Pesce. Ital. p. 40. ; ie 4 o0 PHYSOSTOMI. Scopelus Pennantii, Cuv. and Val. xxii, p. 486; Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (Hd. 3) i, p- 330; White, Catal. p. 82. Scopelus maurolici, Cuv. and Val. xxu, p. 439. Maurolicus Miilleri, Kroyer, Dan. Fisk. 10, p. 113. Argentina hebridica (pt.) Giinther, Catal. vi, p. 203. Argentine, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, iv, p. 301, pl. cexxxiii. B. ix, D. 10 (2), P. 16, V. 7, A. 104-12 + 4-13, C. 19, L. 1. 28, L. tr. 6, Coase: pyl. 8, Vert. 32. Length of head 4 to 42, of caudal fin 61 to 71, height of body 5 to 52 (4¢ in the young) in the total length. Hye—diameter 2$ to 33 in the length of the head, 3/4 to nearly 1 diameter from the end of the snout, and rather more than half a diameter apart: interorbital space concave from side to side, with a ridge running down its centre. Body and head compressed: the greatest width of the body does not quite equal half its height. Cleft of mouth deep, the maxilla wide and reaching to below the middle of the orbit: lower jaw prominent. Teeth—fine ones in a single row in both jaws, none on the vomer or palate. Fims—the rayed dorsal commences midway between the hind edge of the eye and the base of the caudal fin: its highest rays rather exceed one-half the height of the body below the fin: the adipose dorsal is very rudimentary, being apparently absent in some examples. Pectoral about half as long as the head. Ventral about as long as one diameter of the orbit, and inserted on a vertical line almost immediately beneath the first dorsal ray, and not quite reaching the insertion of the anal. The anal fin arises on a line somewhat posterior to the base of the last dorsal ray: the first ten rays are somewhat similar to, but rather shorter than, those in the dorsal fin, the succeeding ones are smaller, and the last few in some specimens again increase in size, but owing to their fragility, and being imbedded among the muscles and scales, it becomes extremely difficult to ascertain their numbers: in some I have only been able to discover about 26 in all: in the fine example figured there seem to be 33. Scales—cycloid, higher than wide, very deciduous, but distinct: although’ in the British Museum catalogue it is remarked that there are no regular scales, this is due to their having been abraded, leaving the subjacent silvery pigment visible: still even in the Redcar specimens some can be seen if a magnifying glass is employed. Luminous spots, not elevated but level with the surface of the skin, are very distinct, one on the preorbital, one beneath the chin, one at the posterior angle of the lower jaw: six on the branchiostegal rays: six on the chest, in a line terminating posteriorly at the upper part of the base of the pectoral fin: twelve along the lower edge of the abdomen between the humeral arch and the base of the ventral fin: parallel to this last row and commencing at the upper edge of the base of the pectoral fin, and terminating above the base of the ventral are eight more: six more in a single row between the bases of the ventral and anal fins: fifteen along the base of the anal, and eight more along the lower edge of the body between that fin and the caudal: over the commencement of the anal fin exists a single spot a little higher up than the anal row. Stomach ccecal, with longitudinal well developed rugz: in those opened no food existed, but small gravel was present in the mouth and fauces: eight large and rather long cecal appendages: intestines making only two curvatures: testicles and ovaries very long, reaching almost the entire length of the abdominal cavity. Pseudobranchize well developed. Colowrs—hack of a glossy brown or black, with, during life, two zig-zag lighter lines along either side of the back: sides of the head and body of a burnished silvery lustre: a dark band just before the base of the caudal fin: a black mark at the base of most of the luminous spots. Varieties—I have examined numerous examples and find that the number of rays in the anal fin may vary from twenty-six to thirty-seven, owing I suppose to injuries due to friction. No other essential differences being apparent, these scarcely appear sufficient to constitute distinct species. The height of the body in small examples is considerably greater in proportion than that in larger ones. Hutton (Trans. New Zealand Inst. vii, p. 250, pl. xi, f. 90 d) described Maurolicus Australis, from exampies captured at Milford Sound and Cuttle Cove, New STERNOPTYCHID. 51 Zealand, and which he doubtfuily separated from M. borealis. Dr. Giinther (An. Nat. Hist. (4) xvii, p. 399) having examined a specimen pronounced it to be Maurolicus amethystino-punctatus, Cocco, from the Mediterranean. Hutton, 1. c. vill, p. 215, states that it is a Gonostoma. The figure gives the impression that the fish is Mawrolicus Pennantia. Names.—Pennant first termed this fish the Sheppy argentine, the latter designation gave rise to great inconvenience due to its not being an “argentine.”’ Yarrell proposed the unobjectionable name of ‘‘ Pearl sides.” Habits.—Of these but little is known. During their breeding season, or from January until May, they are thrown on our shores in varying numbers and in proportion to the violence of the weather, and it is only in the examples obtained by Higgins in Somersetshire that we possess a record of their capture so late in the season as July. Means of captuwre—Generally it is thrown on shore by the violence of the sea. Breeding.—As the ova, which are large, were ready for shedding in examples captured in February and the milt was similarly forward, it appears that off Scotland they must breed during the earlier portion of the year. Habitat.—F rom the coasts of Scandinavia, to the British Isles, shores of France and through the Mediterranean: off Italy, Giglioli observes, it is rare, but obtained at Niza, and Messina in July and September. Low states that his single example from the Orkneys was given him by a boy, who found it at the edge of the water among the sea ware, since then several specimens have been procured by Dr. Duguid and Mr. Heddle (W. Baikie, Zool. 1853): Mr. Peach recorded it from Wick: Edward remarked that it is a regular winter visitant off the Banff coast, being never absent during January, and from 1 to 3 inches in length: Mr. Sim has collected for me at Aberdeen: during the last two winters nearly two hundred examples, it being cast. on the beach in great abundance during the months of January, February and March: four specimens up to nearly 2 inches in length were taken in April, 1833, from the Firth of Forth (Clarke, 1. c.): two or three specimens are in the Glasgow Museum: Mr. Rudd first obtained this fish at Redcar in May, 1841: in 1843 he found thirteen specimens: in February, 1851, four: and in February and March, 1852, forty (Zool. 1852, p. 3504): it has been taken off Devonshire as recorded by Walcott (Yarrell) : Higgins obtained three specimens at Weston-super-Mare in the month of July (Zool. 1861, p. 7317) : Pennant’s specimen came from sea at Downing, off Flintshire. Its capture in Ireland has been reported March 11th, 1847, at Killiney Bay, near Dublin (Thompson, Ann. and Mag. 1847, p. 171). The example figured life-size was taken at Aberdeen by Mr. Sim. Nore.—Paralepis. Dunn observes, ‘one of this genus was driven on shore alive by porpoises at Polkerris, near Par, June 2nd, 1869. I sent it to Mr. Couch, who says it is the first known in England. Its length was about 14 inches, depth 13 inches. The sides of the fish were of an uniform ay colour. It was covered with scales, but so delicate that they came off on being ndled.” iw) PHYSOSTOMI. we Famity II—SALMONID A, Jfiller. Pseudobranchie present. Margin of the upper jaw formed by the premaxillaries and maxillaries. No barbels. Anteriorly a rayed dorsal fin, and posteriorly an adipose one. Pyloric appendages as a rule present, and usually numerous. Body scaled. Head scaleless. Air-bladder large, simple, and with a pneumatic duct. The ova pass into the cavity of the abdomen before being extruded. Geographical distribution—Marine and freshwater forms, some of the former being exclusively inhabitants of the deep sea, others again being anadromous, periodically ascending rivers in order to deposit their spawn. Normally they are confined to the Arctic and temperate portions of the northern hemisphere, with the exception of one species which has been found existing in New Zealand. Some of the genera among the salmonoids furnish most valuable food to the human race, consequently it has been an object to extend their range into the waters of distant lands. In introducing exotic fishes, one of the first considerations must necessarily be to ascertain whether any representatives of the family are normally resident in the region it is desired to stock, and if they are whether the race is a thriving or a diminutive one; for it has been maintained that if the latter the chances of success are too small to render the attempt worth making, as the region is probably unsuited for their development. By retarding the germination of the ova by means of ice (see Introduction), eggs of salmonide have been safely carried to Tasmania and elsewhere, and the races successfully introduced. In 1866 I attempted to similarly convey trout into the waters of the table lands on the Neilgherries and adjacent hills in Madras. These mountain ranges embrace a geographical area extending over 268,494 square miles: their peaks vary from 5000 to 8000 feet above the sea, and Ootacamund, where the experiment was tried, is 7426 feet above the sea-level, with an annual mean temperature of 58° 68’. Although I failed, two years subsequently Mr. McIvor succeeded by bringing out the young fish from Scotland, and they have bred in their new home, enabling me to give a figure in the third part of my Fishes of India, published August, 1877, taken from an Indian born trout.* Synopsis of Genera. 1. Salmo.—Maxillary long: dentition strong and complete. Scales small. Anal rays in moderate numbers (14 or less). Pyloric appendages numerous. 2. Osmerus.—Maxillary long: dentition complete, with fang-like teeth on the vomer and tongue. Scales of medium size. Pyloric appendages few. 3. Coregonus.—Macxillary short: teeth if present minute. Anterior dorsal fin with few rays. Scales of moderate size. Pyloric appendages numerous. 4, Thymallus—Maxillary short: small teeth in the jaws, vomer, and on the palatine bones. Anterior dorsal fin many rayed. Scales of moderate size. Pyloric appendages numerous. 5. Argentina.—Maxillary short: teeth absent from jaws. Anterior dorsal fin with few rays. Scales rather large. Pyloric appendages few or in moderate numbers. * On recording my first failure, Dr. Giinther as editor of the Zoological Record, remarked, as ‘has been foreseen by all acquainted with the nature of salmonoid fishes.” And since it succeeded, in his “Introduction to the Study of Fishes,” 1880, p. 641, he has observed ‘‘the attempt of transferring them into the low streams of India ended (as could be foreseen) in a total failure,” SALMONIDA. 53 Genus I—Satmo, Aréedi- Fario and Salar, Cuvier: Trutta and Salvelini, Nilsson. Branchiostegals nine to thirteen: pseudobranchie present. Hyes lateral. Cleft of meuth deep, the posterior extremity of the upper jaw reaching to beneath the hind edge of the eye or even beyond. Teeth conical, present on jaws, vomer, palatine bones and tengue, absent from the pterygoids. Anterior dorsal fin with a moderate number of rays (10-15) : anal with rather few (10-13). Scales small and cycloid, none on the kead. ateral-line straight. Cccal appendages numerous. A pancreas present. Geographical distribution.—This family of physostomatous fishes is found in Europe, Asia and America, and is most abundant in the Arctic or colder regions, in contradistinction to the distribution of the carps and siluroids, which augment in numbers the nearer we approach the tropics. The groups of salmon and trout are so intimately cennected one with another that a common origin to both would scarcely be denied, and here arises the inquiry of whether their ancestors were originally marine or inhabitants of the fresh waters. Several structural reasons appear to point to the sea having originally been the place of their abode. If we look at the salmon we observe that although it ascends into the fresh waters to breed, so soon as it leaves the sea and enters rivers it begins to deteriorate in condition, its flesh becomes softer in quality and paler in colour, while the silvery lustre of the scales commences to change to a more muddy hue. The indigenous species belonging to this genus have been placed in three sub-generic groups, and to a certain extent arbitrarily separated from one another in the following manner :— A. Anadromous species, with deciduous vomerine teeth, which are usually shed at an early age. Salmo. B. Non-migratory fresh water species, with deciduous vomerine teeth. Fario. C. Non-migratory fresh water species, in which the vomerine teeth are restricted to near the head of that bone. Salvelinc. The two first of these groups not being separated one from the other by any impassable barrier, I propose in the following remarks to allude generally both to the sub-genus Salmones or salmons, and trout, leaving observations upon the Salvelini or charrs, until that group comes specially under consideration. During the present century much has been written in this country respecting the salmon and the trout, their natural history and economic uses. Founded possibly upon the views of sportsmen, naturalists, and fishermen, laws have been enacted from which but insufficient benefits have accrued, making one reflect whether our ancestors may not have been more practically acquainted with the habits of these fish and the requirements of fisheries, than are the legislators of the present century. It may not be waste of space, when referring to the important family of Salmonide, first to ascertain what have been the views held by the best known of our later naturalists concerning the species or varieties of true Salinonide which are found in or around these islands; for the genus Saimo has been divided into (1) Salmones, or true salmons, wherein the body of the vomer is toothed at some period of their lives, and (2) the Salvelini or charrs, which have the vomerine teeth restricted to near the head of that bone. Donovan, in his British Fishes (1802-1808), referred to the (1) sewen or Salmo cambricus, of which he tells us, among other indications, that the head is shorter than in the common salmon, and the tail more forked—this he considered to be an anadromous form peculiar to Wales; (2) the common salmon, Salmo salar ; (8) the trout, Salmo fario, which he observed to be subject to many variations. He alluded to that from the Llynteifi, a lake of South Wales, termed Coch y dail, and marked with black spots as large as sixpences; to a crooked-tailed variety in the Hinion, a river not far from Machynllaeth, and also to a similar form being in o4 PHYSOSTOMI. the Snowdon lakes; to the Gillaroo trout of Ireland, remarkable for the great thickness of its stomach, though it does not otherwise differ from the common trout; and, lastly, to some in Scotch lakes that are spotted very differently from the common sorts, which he suspected to be a distinct species, but of which he makes no further mention. He likewise alluded to how trout vary in size, and referred to the Fordwich form, in Kent, which attains to nearly that of the salmon; to the Buddaghs of Lough Neagh, in Ireland, some of which have been known to weigh 30 lb. He also remarked upon trout, the flesh of which was both of the red and white kind, although captured during the same season in two contiguous streams in Cardiganshire, one of which invariably produced the red and the other the white variety. Turton admitted into the British fauna, 1807—(1) the salmon, Salmo salar ; (2) the shewen, Salmo eriow, to which he referred Donovan’s sewen; (3) the salmon trout, Salmo trutta; (4) the common trout, Salmo fario; (6) the white salmon, Salmo phinoc; and (6) the samlet, Salmo salmulus. Fleming, in his History of British Animals, 1828, gave first those anadromous forms that have a forked tail, as (1) the common salmon, Salmo salar; (2) the bull trout, Salmo hucho, which is little inferior to the salmon in size, but more elongated, and has white and insipid flesh, but which he states has no teeth on the vomer; (3) the phinock or white trout, Salmo albus, which seldom attains to a foot in length, and is common in the seas and rivers of Scotland and the North of England. Secondly, anadromous forms with even tails, as (4) the sea trout, Salmo trutta, of which he considered the samlet or parr to be the young of this or of the salmon, the migrations of the two almost coinciding; (5) the gray trout, Salmo ertow, including S. cambricus, and found in the sea and in rivers. Lastly, forms stationary in rivers, as (6) the common trout, Salmo fario, remarking of the Gillaroo variety that when it feeds on shell-fish the coats of the stomach acquire a thickness similar to the gizzards of birds. Agassiz, Brit. Assoc. 1834, only admitted (1) Salmo salar; (2) S. trutta; (38) S. fario, and (4) the charr S. wmbla. Jenyns, in his Manual of British Vertebrate Animals, 1835, included (1) the common salmon; (2) the bull trout or gray salmon, S. eriox ; (3) the sea trout, S. trutta, inhabiting the sea and rivers, identical with the salmon-trout of the London markets and the white trout of Pennant and Fleming; (4) the common trout, S. fario, with its variety the Gillaroo; (5) the great lake trout, S. ferox, which he believed to be identical with S. lacustris, of Berkenhout, though Agassiz believed not of continental authors. Yarrell, in his History of British Fishes, 1836, gave (1) the salmon; (2) the bull trout or gray trout, S. erioz and S. cambricus ; (8) the salmon trout, S. trutta; (4) the parr or samlet, S. salmulus; (5) the common trout; (6) the great lake trout; and in a later edition (7) the Loch Leven trout, S. levenensis. r Knox added Salmo estuarius in 1855. Parnell in 1838, in his prize essay on the Fishes of the Firth of Forth, entered very fully into his views respecting the Salmonide. He admitted (1) the salmon; (2) the bull trout, S. eriox, of which he enumerates and figures the following varieties which he has obtained in the Firth of Forth:—a salmon spotted bull trout, a few spotted bull trout, a thickly spotted bull trout, a large headed bull trout, a curved spotted bull trout, a crescent tailed bull trout, a Norway bull trout, and a salmon bull trout identical with S. truita of Jenyns and Yarrell; (3) salmon trout, S. trutta, which is likewise the same as S. albus of Fleming; (4) the parr; (5) the common trout; (6) the Loch Leven trout. | ardine, in his British Salmonide, 1839, figured (1) the salmon; (2) the phinock; (3) the great lake trout; (4) the common trout and varieties; (5) the Solway migratory trout; (6) the salmon trout. White, in the list of the specimens of British animals in the National Museum enumerated in 1851 (1) the common salmon; (2) the sea trout; (3) the bull or gray trout; (4) the common trout; (5) and the great lake trout. Thompson, in his Natural History of Ireland, 1856, gave—(1) the salmon, including the parr; (2) the gray or bull trout, S. ertow; (3) the salmon trout; (4) SALMONIDE. 5D the common trout, including the Gillaroo, which variety he recorded having met with in most fresh water races; (5) the great lake trout. Dr. Giinther, in a catalogue of fishes in the British Museum, described in 1866 the following anadromous forms:—(1) Salmo salar, Vertebre, 59 (60), Coecal appendages, 51 to 77; (2) S. argenteus, Coec. pyl. 61-67; (3) S. trutta, Vert. 59-60, Coec. pyl. 43-61; (4) S. orcadensis, Vert. 56-57, Coec. pyl. 50; (5) S. brachypoma, Vert. 59, Coec. pyl. 45-47; (6) S. cambricus, Vert. 59, Coee. pyl. 33-52. And of the non-migratory fresh water forms, admitted—(7) S. levenensis, Vert. 57-59, Cove. pyl. 49-90; (8) S. fario, variety Gaimardi, Vert. 59-60, Ceec. pyl. 33-46, variety ausonit, Vert. 57-58, Coec. pyl. 38-47; (9) S. ferow, Vert. 56-57, Coee. pyl. 43-49; (10) S. stomachicus, Vert. 59-60, Coec. pyl. 44; (11) S. gallr- vensis, Vert. 59, Coec. pyl. 44; (12) S. nigripinnis, Vert. 57-59, Coc. pyl. 36-42. From the foregoing we find that Donovan, Turton, Fleming, Jenyns, Yarrell, Parnell, Jardine, Thompson, and White admitted the existence of five or six British species of true salmons in our waters, which Giinther increased to twelve, as well as two varieties of the common trout. A thorough investigation into these various forms possesses more than a passing interest, for if we have many species of true salmon and trout in our waters and they interbreed, it first becomes a consideration as to what are the probabilities of sterility occurring in the offspring? On the other hand, should trout from two apparently distinct species be crossed and no unusual phenomenon occur, except improvement in the breed, while signs of sterility do not follow, the supposition must be raised that we are dealing with local races and not with different species, and that the young are mongrels and not hybrids. Here I must shortly allude to how I propose discriminating between local races or varieties and species, for what one naturalist considers a variety another looks upon as a species. I shall consider species among the true salmons to be an assemblage of individuals which agree together in their structure and in the development of the sexes, but differ in some structural character from all other fishes. Also that functionally they are capable of fertile union together, but not to an equal extent or not at all with the members of any other group of fishes. Even within the limits of a single species we find no two exactly similar, but a tendency to divergence from the original type appears to exist, which power of divergence is most likely to preserve and accumulate useful variations. For it has been abundantly proved that artificially, by judicious selection and breeding from individuals which are possessed of some desired variation, such may become permanent in future generations; while natural selection (perhaps assisted by some unknown factor) would similarly tend to favour the continuation in a wild state of such forms as possess variation favourable to the life of the animal, and thus produce and continue certain local varieties or races. If, however, the variations from the type, present in certain examples, are not of a persistent character, nor exceed the differences between the limits laid down for a species, these cannot be considered as indicating a distinct species; for to render such valid, we must have a permanence of variation from the original type (see vol. i, p- 245). Thus, among the sticklebacks we find in the ten-spined form some, due to local causes, possessing ventral fins, others destitute of them; but their difference not being permanent merely resolves itself into a local race or variety. The number of vertebras and the cecal appendages have been asserted to be constant characters which may materially assist in fixing a species among the Salmonide, and I propose investigating in detail some of these various structural and functional differences that have been brought forward for the purpose of establishing species among the true salmon, Salmones. Dr. Giinther has pointed out nine constant characters of variation in his elaborate treatment of these fishes, and which I shall commence alluding to as my conclusions differ from those he has so elaborately set forth. 1. The number of vertebra. The constancy of this character we are told “is truly surprising,” as an excess over the normal number by two, or a decrease to the same extent, is of rare occurrence. But the inquirer finds that in the recorded number of these bones in the migratory species, the variation has been restricted 56 PHYSOSTOMI. by Dr. Giinther to between fifty-nine and sixty, and among the reputed seven non-migratory forms to between fifty-six and sixty. Occasionally two small vertebre take the place of one large one, as if a division had occurred; while in others may be observed an abnormally large one, as if two had coalesced, as shown by the normal number of hemal spines for two bones being present. Dr. Giinther instances a case ‘‘ where three vertebree were united,” and Cobbold ‘of the coalescence of numerous vertebral centra.” In a fish wherein these bones normally number about sixty, an extreme variation of five (especially as such has not been proved to be constant) does not by itself appear to be beyond what might be anticipated in a single species; and inconstant variations would scarcely justify the creation of a new specific name for the reception of such, unless conjoined to other circumstances. Among a number of common trout which I captured at Colesbourne, on the Cotswold Hills in Gloucestershire, some had fifty-seven, others fifty-eight vertebrae ; while in a few received from Cardiganshire I ascertained that this variation extended to between fifty-seven and sixty. As the extreme limits of variation recorded in this country among the common trout have been between fifty-six and sixty, and as these examples of an undoubted single species captured in one locality gave from fifty-seven to sixty, it would seem to be a rash conclusion to formulate species of Salmonide solely consequent upon an enumeration of the number of vertebra as ascertained in a few specimens. Only one fact appears to be rendered exceedingly probable, which is, that anadromous forms generally possess an excess of one or two vertebrz over such as are more strictly residents only in fresh waters. 2. The number of cecal appendages.—This has been adduced as a character which may materially aid in discriminating a species. If the list of British Salmones already referred to is examined, it will be seen that these appendages in the common salmon may vary between fifty-one and seventy-seven, and in the Loch Leven trout between forty-nine to ninety. (It must be noticed that personally I have observed larger variations than are here recorded, but I have purposely restricted myself to the numbers given in the British Museum catalogue.) These ccoeca are capable of distension, of subdivision, of amalgamation between two or more, or of being longer or shorter than is commonly the case. The difficulty does not appear in discovering variations, but in determining within what fixed number they exist in a given species. At Colesbourne, I found in the common brook trout already referred to, from thirty-four to thirty-nine ccecal appendages, and up to forty- four in the Cardiganshire examples, the same as in S. ferox. .The question forces itself on our consideration whether in any form of trout the number of these appendages are persistent or inconstant, and whether change of climate or food may occasion any variation. Here I must refer to the results obtained from the examination of trout that have been reared in distant localities, but descended from British breeds. Mr. Arthur (Transactions of the Otago Institute, July 9, 1878) refers to the stock of common trout ‘‘ which were liberated in our streams in November, 1869, and from these and their descendants the ova for stockmg the rivers in Otago have been obtained.” The original ova came from Tasmania, the trout existing there being the proceeds from three batches of eggs supplied from Hngland through the kind offices of Mr. Francis Francis and Mr. Frank Buckland. They were obtained from streams in Buckinghamshire and Hampshire, and reputed to be the eggs of the common brook trout. The number of coecal appendages is recorded in six instances from Otago, and they varied from forty-three to fifty-four, whereas the limits in the British race is restricted in the British Museum catalogue to between thirty-three and forty-seven. Hven were these hybrids, and their existence was pointed out by Willughby, the number of their ccecal appendages would still exceed, by at least seven, any recorded among the British non-migratory forms, except the Loch Leven trout, and are consequeutly an excellent instance of the inconstancy of their number. Here I must refer to Mr. Senior’s observations on these trout, now in a wild state, as he has observed them in some parts of Tasmania. Owing to the abundance of winged insects, beetles, grasshoppers, &c., it seldom rises at the artificial fly ; when hooked it has lost the energy of its ancestors, for after one rush if bafiled it SALMONIDA. 57 tamely gives in, while at table it is muddy and coarse, like an English tench. Perhaps were its digestion more rapid its vigour would increase and it seems as if nature is now augmenting the number of its cecal appendages, and consequently increasing the extent of its intestinal area. As regards the Loch Leven trout, reasons exist for suspecting the race to be more nearly allied to the anadromous than to the true fresh water species. We may thus be dealing with a race that is changing from a marine to a fresh water form, living as it now does in fresh water, but haying the colour of a sea-trout. Some examples in the British Museum, captured during the month of April, have the ccecal appendages fewer in number than commonly perceived in the Salmo levenensis, but they are wider than normal, and may be instances of a confluence of two or more into one, but it is suggestive that this character is very inconstant in this species, which seems to be in a transitional condition; perhaps their diameter will gradually diminish, until in time cooca similar to such as are found in the common brook-trout will be present. Whatever the result of such an investigation might be, it is still evident that the number of ccocal appendages in the various species of trout or salmon is inconstant, and consequently should be most guardedly employed for the purpose of constituting a species. British marine salmonide possess more of these appendages than do the strictly fresh water forms, while a change of climate to the antipodes seems to increase the necessity for these organs, and as a result in their numbers, in such as are bred there. Here I shall refer to one of the so-called inconstant variations, or changes of colour, such being closely relating to the foregoing remarks upon the Loch Leven trout, the tints of which resemble those of sea forms as much as do the number of their ccecal appendages. Variations in colour must be due to some cause acting directly or indirectly on the fish. Thus, among the young of the members of the Salmonide, we perceive that dark bands or bars down their sides are almost universal, being evidently hereditary throughout the family. This same banding of the young is seen in some of the horse-mackerel, Carana, flying-fish, Hxocetus, the gar-fish, Belone, etc. It has been erroneously asserted that the young of the migratory forms of salmon and trout possess two or three more bars than the non-migratory brook trout. These bars, as well as the black and red spots on the sides, are almost invariably lost in the anadromous forms when they are in a condition to migrate into salt water, and assume their silvery smolt stage (with or without X-shaped black spots). In rivers it is rare for bands to be retained in adult trout, while most of the black and red ocellated spots as a rule remain, although instances have been recorded in which they have entirely disappeared. In streams where, due to some local cause, the trout are small, it is not uncommon to perceive the bars as well as the black and red ocellated spots retained throughout life. I found this obtained among some from brooks near Penzance ; in fact, they were as brilliant as young parrs, to which, except for the white edging to some of their fins, they bore rather a striking resemblance: in a few instances I have also observed this, but to a much fainter degree, in trout taken at Colesbourne, in Gloucestershire. Examples of brook trout have been found on emigrating to the sea, as a rule (to which there are exceptions), to assume the brilliant silvery livery.of the migrating salmonoids, as well as their X-shaped black spots. Mr. Harvie Brown remarked (June 12th, 1882) on having caught at Durness several so-called “ sea trout’’ from a sea pool, or first pool at the mouth of the river, fresh water at low tide, salt or brackish at high tides. From their silvery appearance they are known as “sea trout,” but are the river form acclimatized to brackish or nearly salt water, or else periodically visiting the same between tides. Mr. Lockington (American Naturalist, May, 1880, p. 368) observed the same phenomenon in the Western hemisphere, where the Salmo iridens, a resident in all Californian brooks and rivers, descends in the’ autumn to the sea, and when in salt water changes its colour to a steel blue, while its spots mostly disappear. But although we may generally anticipate the non-migratory forms to be more vividly coloured than such as are strictly marine, still among the former there are numerous variations in tints and markings which have been explained in more 58 PHYSOSTOMI. than one manner, as the nuptial season, the effects of temporary emotions, of age, or the state of the creature’s health, or its food. It has been observed that a residence in sea or brackish water causes the fish to assume a general silvery or steel colour, with or without black spots, and that these latter are not surrounded by a light circle. Clear water in rapid rivers or lakes,* especially when the bottom is pebbly, is similarly seen to contain somewhat silvery fishes, with black X-shaped spots. Sir William Jardine remarked that a variety very frequent among trout in small Alpine lochs in Scotland had large dark or red spots placed in a pale or clear surrounding field, these marks being very large, while the principal part of the spotting was confined to the centre of the body. The colour, depth, and character of the water also have an influence on the fish, the presence of moss and peat, or a muddy bottom, usually causing a dark tint, while some captured in dark holes or caves have been seen nearly black. The colours of the Salmones may be shortly summed up as silvery, with or without black spotst among the marine, and some resident in large clear pieces of water, as lochs or rivers: more or less speckled with black and red when non-migratory and living in fresh waters: while should the race be small, a persistence of the transverse bars or bands on the body, which are present in most of the young, may be observed even in adults. Irrespective of changes in colour externally, a difference in food may occasion it in the flesh of these fish, whether such alteration in diet is due to choice or to necessity. Thus crustacea and their allies may be absent from the locality they frequent, or if present the fish may not relish that food so much as some other which exists in the water. In certain rivers there are trout with white and others with red flesh, the two forms being in good health and equally delicate for the table. This has also been observed in the American charr, Salmo fontinalis, introduced into this country, and in which it has been clearly traceable to the food it lives upon. 3. The form of the preopercle in adult fish. The shape of this bone varies in species belonging to the true Salmones with the age of the fish, while it has likewise been remarked that in some races the development of its lower limb is much more pronounced that it is in others obtained from different localities. This, however, merely shows that in the marine as in the fresh water races there are fish subject to variations in the shape of this bone. The limb is very short in the young, elongating with age in some forms, but not so in others; while an arrest of development may easily take place even on opposite sides of the head of a specimen, which were this the sole criterion of species, might, and sometimes does, show Salmo trutta on one side and S. albus, or brachypoma, on the other. Thompson was of opinion that differences in the form of this bone may sometimes be due to sex. 4, The width and strength of the maxillary in adult fish. This will depend upon the food which the fish has subsisted upon during its lifetime. If this organ has been much called into action, it will greatly exceed in size and strength what is found in examples in which it has been less employed. It appears to be almost invariable that the lower jaw is more developed in the male than in the female, besides which in the former it is often provided with a hook at its extremity. 5. The size of the maxillary and of the vomerine teeth. The same remarks are suitable to this form of variation as apply to the maxillary bone. 6. The arrangement and permanence of the vomerine teeth. These vary so * Percy St. John, in Wild Sports of the West, p. 240, remarks that he “never observed the effect of bottom soil upon the quality of fish so strongly marked as in the trout taken in a small lake in the county of Monaghan. The water is a long irregular sheet, of no great depth, one shore bounded by a bog, the other by a dry and gravelly surface. On the bog side the trout are of the dark and shapeless species peculiar to moory loughs, while the other affords the beautiful and sprightly variety, generally inhabiting rapid and sandy streams. Narrow as the lake is, the fish appear to confine themselves to their respective limits: the red trout being never found upon the bog moiety of the lake, nor the black where the under surface is hard gravel.” + It cannot be admitted that the black X-shaped spots are due to the influence of salt water, as we see them present in our strictly fresh water grayling, Thymallus. SALMONIDZ. 59 much in different specimens of the same species that it would be very unsafe to base any specific differences upon such a slender substrata of fact. 7. The form of the caudal fin in specimens of a given size, age, and sexual development. Here again the locality which the fish inhabited must be taken into consideration, for it has a great bearing upon the formation of the fins, being required of a much greater strength in rapid streams than in such as are sluggish. Age is no criterion as to size: and sexual development depends upon some, at present, unknown factor, for it seems that temporary sterility is not absent among the salmon. 8. A great development of the pectoral fins when constant in individuals from the same locality. Here sex has an undoubted influence on the size of this fin, it being frequently most developed in the males. Variations in the size of fins do not show sufficient differences on which to constitute species, while in the shape, more especially of the caudal, we find them frequently varying with age, being more or less emarginate in the young compared to what it becomes in the semi-adult and adult stages. 9. The size of the scales. Here the number of rows existing in a line from the back of the adipose dorsal fin to the lateral-line certainly affords one of the most constant characters, but the number along the lateral-line is much more deceptive. Having enumerated the characters stated to be most constant among the two first sub-generic groups in the genus Salmo, I arrive at the conclusion that most of them are fallacious, and that too great a stress having been placed upon them, many errors have resulted. The consequence has been that the number of species has been unduly augmented, and local races having been accorded generic rank, intermediate forms have not been searched for, but new ones constantly hunted up. Thus the synonymy will be a cause of endless confusion to future ichthyologists. Besides this every little variety of form, colour or structure, has been accounted for by terming such hybrids. The proportions of different parts of the body vary with age among the Salmonide as they do in other fishes, and even more considerably in some anadromous forms which have been subjected to unnatural retention in fresh waters, insufficiency of food or sickness from any cause. While the head of the male is usually longer than that of the female, although in barren males the disproportion is not very considerable. A few remarks are here necessary upon hybridism among the Salmonide, for from our earliest authors on ichthyology down to the present period the existence of such has been remarked upon, and of late years artificial propagation has clearly proved that such may occur. Experiments in order to test this question were instituted by Professor Rasch in 1867, and he found that the ova of the sea and river trout are developed regularly, whatever forms were the parent ones, and that the offspring were fertile. That of the ova of the charr fertilized by the milt of the trout, thirty to forty per ceut. were developed, but that many young fish perished after being hatched. ‘Trout ova, fertilized by the milt of the charr, only gave ten per cent. of young, many of which were misshapen. Salmon ova fertilized with trout milt yielded forty per cent. of young fish, but more if the milt of the charr were employed. The ova of a hybrid between a trout and a charr could not be fertilized by means of a trout milt. The foregoing facts are suggestive that a very close relationship exists between the anadromous marine trout and the non-migratory form inhabiting fresh waters. Thus we are informed that the anadromous sewin, or anadromous trout of Welsh rivers, very commonly interbreeds with the brook trout, hybrids being the result. In the British Museum may be seen a beautiful series of these fishes presented by the Rey. A. Morgan from the Rhymney, a few of which have been retained in fresh water after the normal period for their descent to the sea had arrived. Some have elongated bodies, others comparatively long pectoral fins ; and, again, hybrids are said to be present between the sewin and the brook trout, a conclusion seemingly arrived at because their teeth are more developed than in the sea-going form, while their pectoral fins and colour approximate to those of the non-migratory 60 PHYSOSTOMI. brook trout. Sterility, however, does not appear to normally exist in these so-called hybrids which raises a suspicion that we may be dealing with developing varieties and not with hybrids at all. And as these forms have facilities for returning to the sea, did they desire to do so, we are led to ask whether some of them may not be changing their conditions of life, and as a result developing structural differences, or even whether they and the brook trout can be really distinct species.* At Sir James Gibson Maitland’s fish farm at Howietoun, some of the young of the Loch Leven trout take on cannibal propensities, and if small their colour is yellow, their teeth become abnormally developed, and they grow very rapidly. It is thus evident that under certain circumstances we may find trout provided with stronger teeth than is usual in the species. If we look at examples of sewin retained some time in fresh water ponds we see their pectoral fins more pointed and usually longer than in their sea-going relatives. This leaves chiefly for consideration whether these silvery forms with black X-shaped spots could, under any conditions, assume the deep coloured and spotted appearance of the common brook trout, or anything approaching to it. At Howietoun this general yellow tint shows itself when the fish has arrived at about its fourth year, but is also affected by seasons and food. When fed upon horseflesh they remain of a gray colour, if clams (Pecten obtusata) are given they assume the yellow colour. Overcrowding large ones, or such as are 4 1b. or upwards, induces rusty spots; if the numbers are reduced, and vegetable food given, as lilies and clover, they became gray; while silvery scales are a sign that they are in their primest condition. The young parrs may retain red spots up to eighteen months old, but such are almost absent between that age and three years. Red spots on large fish are mostly perceived in examples intermediate between kelts and trout in their primest condition, but occasionally they are present all the year round. During the breeding season the males, if healthy, assume a brownish orange colour, or if from considerable depths a darker tint, while the females are golden or orange red. It consequently appears that conditions of health and changes of food may cccasion alterations not only in the superficial colour of these trout, but likewise in their more deeply-seated colour spots. The foregoing point out that as the colour of Loch Leven trout may be altered by food and conditions of health, there exists no reason why the same changes may not occur among examples of sewin which take on a fresh water state of existence, more especially as the British Museum possesses some of these so-called hybrids from the Copenhagen Museum. In the series of Welsh fishes the whole of the changes from the anadromous sewin may be explained as natural sequences to ascertained causes and without accepting the theory of their being non-sterile hybrids. d Much discussion has arisen why some of the salmon breed earlier in certain rivers than in others, whether this is due to the temperature of the water, or occasioned by alterations in the physical conditions of the bed of the stream and its affluents ; or, lastly, to the local breed being an early or late one. This last question involves the consideration of whether necessity having compelled the change from what was an early breeding river into a late one, the descendants of the fish removed to suitable localities would still adhere to the late period of spawning of their immediate progenitors, or return to the earlier time of their ancestral stock. In looking at these questions it will be necessary first to consider whether any general rules as to dates of spawning among this family of fishes can be deduced from what occurs in different localities. The period in Great Britain among the salmon may be roughly estimated (excluding local exceptions and climatic eccentricities) at from the commencement of September until the middle of January. Sir Humphrey Davy, writing from Southern Austria, remarked that ‘“ the charr I got this morning with mature eggs was just about to spawn, yetin England * Tf, as asserted, these are hybrids between two species, the sewin and the brook trout, it is difficult to understand why these is a regular gradation between the two forms, SALMONIDA. 61 they spawn in the winter. If summer is the spawning time of the charrand trout of the lakes of Southern Austria, it is connected with or owing to the waters at that time being of the temperature best fitted for the purpose, most of these lakes being fed by mountain streams, frozen in the winter, and full in summer from the melting of the snow.” In Sweden, Artedi remarked that the salmon spawned in the middle of the summer. Dr. Heysham stated that in Cumberland salmon at first prefer spawning in the warmer streams, leaving the snow-fed ones until later on. Yarrell considered that “rivers issuing from large lakes afford early salmon, the waters having been purified by deposition in the lakes; on the other hand, rivers swollen by melting snows in the spring months are later in their season of producing fish, and yield their supply when the lake rivers are beginning to fail.” I think that without multiplying imstances the fact may be fairly assumed that temperature has some influence in the locality selected by salmon for breeding purposes, the colder and more exposed streams being usually left until somewhat later than the warmer ones, while in very cold regions spawning may be deferred even until the summer months. Were the foregoing views correct, and if temperature irrespective of geographical location has a marked influence upon the time these fishes spawn, we ought to be able to observe such among the trout and Anadromous Salmonoids despatched in the form of ova to Tasmania from this country. Turning to Mr. Allport’s account (Proc. Zool. Soc., 1870, p. 25) we find a most marked corroboration of these views. We know the cold season in that portion of the globe corresponds with our summer, and the very first brook trout which were spawned in Tasmania occurred on July 3, 1866; by the 7th of August fourteen females had been stripped, and shortly afterwards five pair of trout were observed constructing redds in the River Plenty. During June, July and August, 1867, the trout were again stripped of their ova artificially. In this country, as observed by Buckland, trout spawn at different periods in different rivers from about September to February. The very first Tasmanian bred trout hatched from English trout eggs have not selected the month for spawning adopted by their ancestors in this hemisphere, but have chosen others which are better suited for their purpose, clearly demonstrating the possibility of trout being capable under changed conditions of varying the period of the breeding season. But because temperature exercises a manifest influence as to when and where the eggs of Salmonide are deposited, it does not follow that it is the temperature of the water which is the sole cause the salmon has under consideration as to the period at which it shall enter certain rivers, some of which are known to possess spring fish, or such as ascend from March until June, whereas in others they more commonly pass up during and after September. I will first give an instance of a river which was originally an early one, but was found to become a late one by the Earl of Home, who, in 1837, observed “ that in the Tweed a very great change has taken place within these twenty or thirty years ; a considerable portion of the breeding fish not arriving into breeding condition until long after the time they had formerly been in the habit of doing so.” But here the question arises whether this had happened consequent upon any changes in the river, or alteration in the natural period of spawning in the fish irrespective of the condition of the waters. The river itself, it is observed, had changed due to the draining of the sheep farms on the hills, the effect produced being that a little summer flood which took a fortnight or three weeks to run off previous to 1795, is now completely run out in eight hours. The bogs on the hill sides, which were the feeders to the river, have the water at once carried off by drains, causing sudden but short floods, which have all run off before the river has had time to clear itself. Sir H. Davy compared the Tweed district as it was prior to these drains, to what it had become subsequent to their construction—to two houses, the one covered with thatch, and the other with slate ; the first dripping for hours after the rain has fallen, the other ceasing when the rain stops. If sufficient water for ascent does not exist, if no safe-holding pools are present, as observed by Mr. Brandon, a spring salmon would have but little chance of 62 PHYSOSTOMI. ascent, or if it did the great probabilities are that as the water became low it would be knocked on the head. And though he supposes these early fish breed similar descendants, we have but little proof of it, although many excellent fishermen hold the same view. In some Irish rivers the breed of early fish was almost extinguished by allowing the nets to capture all for a season or two, when it very soon came to the point that there was nothing to capture. Kelts and what to do with them has exercised many minds, and I cannot resist thinking that, doubtless, unintentionally, the opinion of some of our older authors have been either misunderstood or misquoted. Without more than just touching upon this subject it seems that it may be divided as follows :—That the salmon subsequent to the spawning season becomes sickly, and is as well destroyed as kept; that while mending it consumes more young salmon, trout, and other fish than it is worth ; that kelts might be eaten. After spawning salmon becomes much exhausted and very easily susceptible to disease and capture. It has been proposed to kill all the male kelts from the commencement of February; and all of either sex from the commencement of March. That the act of fertilizing ova is not invariably fatal to the salmon appears easy of proof, for the male parr possesses milt capable of fecundating ova. It is, therefore, evident that such must be evacuated or retained, and if the latter disease would be induced. Trout kept in confinement may be spawned more than once, omitting the consideration of whether such only takes place on alternate years. A correspondent of the Field observed, “‘a few years ago a fine male fish of about 20lb. was used for spawning purposes at Stormontfield; a mark was put on him by means of a copper wire, and two years afterwards he was got when nearly 30 1b. weight on the same ford and at the same season; and, after doing duty again was returned to the river, hale and strong, but was not traced afterwards.” Mr. Brown records how, on May 4, 1861, he hooked a kelt weighing 16 Ib., and having fastened round his tail a copper medal, on which was stamped “Athol, No. 78.” It had been caught on the preceding April 1, when it only weighed 133 lb., thus showing an increase of 23 lb. in five weeks. The results of the Duke of Athol’s experiments are too well known to need recapitulating. Dr. Ginther suggests that old males or those possessing a hook to the mandible, perish after the efforts of propagation, and cites the observations of Stella, Pallas, and Richardson on the salmonoids of Kamtschatka and North-Western America. He observes of kelted salmon: “ Probably those which reach the sea alive perish there.” Sir John Richardson, however, remarked : “ The destruction by poachers in the higher parts of the rivers of the large enfeebled kelts, or fish which have completed their spawning operations, is also extremely prejudicial, for these individuals (almost utterly useless as food at the time alluded to) would, if allowed to descend to the salubrious sea, ere long revisit their native streams, greatly increased in size, and full of health and vigour.” Daring the period a kelt is mending it lives mostly on small fish, especially young salmon and trout; and Mr. Francis Francis suggests whether, this being the case, it is worth its keep. That by destroying so many small fish, the kelt, it is true, may return of a larger size, but it is questionable whether the river regains so great an aggregate weight of salmon as if numbers of the kelts were slaughtered. It has likewise been proposed that people should be permitted to kill and eat these kelts, which otherwise probably become lost as food. But prior to such a proceeding being sanctioned, it might not be amiss to inquire whether they would be wholesome. Certainly a correspondent of the Field remarks: “I was going to Ilfracombe lately, and saw many old back fish being hawked about. These old salmon come back to the tidal waters to recover before going to sea, and are caught by the score, and have been sold for fourpence a pound.” But if eaten they may occasion poisonous symptoms. Thus Buckland relates how a water- bailiff, who was a strong, healthy man, ate a portion of one,and was made so ill that he was confined to his bed for two days. Dr. Gerald Boate, writing from Treland in 1645, tells us leprosy was caused “through the foul gluttony of the SALMONID. 63 inhabitants in the unwholesome devouring of foul salmon when they are out of season, which is after they have cast their spawn, upon which they do not only grow very weak and flabby, but so unwholesome as it would loathe any man to see them.” Not many months since I saw some unseasonable salmon in the possession of a fisherman, and inquired what he intended to do with them. He informed me they were useless in the market, because if cooked their flesh would become more or less black; but, with a grin, continued, that they did excellently well kippered ! A.—Deciduous vomerine teeth (Salmones).’ SYNOPSIS OF SPECIES. a. About eleven rows of scales in an oblique line from adipose dorsal fin to the lateral-line. 1. Salmo salar, D. 13-14, P. 14, V. 9, A. 11, L. 1. 120-125. b. Fourteen or more rows of scales in an oblique line from adipose dorsal fin to the . lateral-line. 2. Salmo trutta, D. 12-14, P. 14-15, V. 9, A. 10-12, L. 1. 120-130. 2 A. Salmo levenensis, D. 13-14, P. 14-15, V. 9, A. 10-12, L. 1. 115-130. 2B. Salmo fario, D. 13-15, P. 14-15, V. 9, A. 10-12, L. 1. 115-130. The true salmons which are included in this division of the genus Salmo consist of fishes which normally reside in the sea (although in some latitudes they live in lakes), and migrate to rivers in which their ova are deposited and the young hatched and reared. Here we have true anadromous forms, and as the salmon or salmon-trout have the same peculiarity in selecting suitable localities for breeding, differentiated by the fish ascending to nearer the sources of rivers, I propose giving a brief outline of how reproduction is carried on. Salmon enter our rivers in varying numbers throughout the year, unless impurities (as in the Thames) have annihilated the breed. At certain times, as during the cold season, they ascend for the purpose of reaching their spawning beds, and having deposited their eggs in redds or nests, they descend to the sea in a miserable condition, many of the males succumbing from exhaustion. Rondeletius and also Gesner, who wrote upon the salmon upwards of three and a quarter centuries ago, were both upholders of the doctrine that salmon spawned in the sea, one which, were it believed in and acted upon, would be disastrous to our salmon fisheries, as it might be advanced that these fishes could as well breed in the ocean as in rivers, consequently on their behalf no necessity arises for keeping our fresh waters pure, or having free passes in our streams in order to allow them to reach their spawning-beds. It was probably from such views sprang the notion of the parr being a distinct species, and even now there are some who doubt whether our “last springs” are the young of Salmo salar. Willughby, in his History of Fishes, published in 1686, lib. iv, adduces his reasons for disputing the correctness of Rondeletius’s and Gesner’s opinions; while Pontoppidan, in 1755, in his Natural History of Norway, returned to Gesner’s views, asserting that he was well assured that salmon chiefly eject their roe at the mouths of rivers, where they empty themselves into the sea, or else a little above the salt water. Mr. Brander (Field) remarked upon having observed during the preceding summer some holes scooped out in the gravel close to the mouth of the small river Lopie (near the Spey), and within the reach of the salt water, and here he found in January, 1882, a few salmon working at their redds, which were within a mile and a half of the sea, and covered once a fortnight at spring tides with quite salt and undrinkable water, for perhaps an hour’s time. Sir James Matheson, in Davy’s Philosophical Researches (p. 261), has recorded at the mouth of the Greamster, in the Island of Lewis, a similar instance, continuing that the spot is covered with 64 PHYSOSTOMI. “brackish water” only for about two hours at each high tide, but not at all during the neaps, while this brackish water is so diluted as to differ but little from fresh water in specific gravity, the tide serving as a dam to the river water, and by obstructing its free outflow, causing its accumulation and overflow. The foregoing instances occurred near the mouths of small rivers, and should their state be such —due to pollutions or insufficiency of water—that Salmonide are unable to ascend, they may drop or deposit their ova in the sea or at the mouths of rivers; but suppose it is thus deposited, experiments have proved that the presence of salt water is fatal to the fertilizing property of the milt, as also to the life of the impregnated egg, should it come in contact with it. Sir J. Matheson, during the winter of 1860-61, had the following experiment made upon two batches of fertile salmon ova. One lot was placed on a wire cloth in a glass vase, wherein was brackish water which was daily changed, but they all died at the end of the tenth day. The remainder were similarly treated, but with fresh water, and in due time they all arrived at maturity. Mr. Sinclair (Field, February 4th, 1882) remarks apon having taken about one hundred eyed ova, of which two portions were enclosed in wicker baskets and buried in separate streams, one of which was reached every tide by salt water, whereas the other was entirely fresh. They were examined in about three weeks after one set of spring tides, when all which had been reached by the salt water were found to be dead: not so those in which the stream was entirely fresh water. The remaining third were hatched in a wash-hand basin, in which was fresh water changed once a day. Dr. Davy also instituted somewhat similar experiments with artificial saline water, from which it appeared that a degree of saltness, almost or quite equal to that of sea water, is pretty speedily fatal both to the ovum of the salmon and to the young fish: that the same effect is produced on the young fish by brackish water of specific gravity 1016, but in a longer time, and that, when the solution is so diluted as to be reduced to the specific gravity 1007, the advanced ovum may be hatched in it, and the life of the young fish may be sustained in it for a few days, but with diminished owers. ‘ The eggs of the salmon are small, round, elastic bodies, of a clear white, pink, or even coral colour. Due to their tough outer coat they are very elastic, as may be seen by throwing one on the ground, from whence it will rebound like an india- rubber ball. This strength and elasticity we know must be an exceedingly important property if we remember where these eggs are deposited and what an amount of pressure they may have to undergo. Young salmon are hatched from eggs deposited in rivers, not near to its mouth, where the tide or the current would be too strong for the young fish to live in, but in small and often mountainous streams, where the water is pure and shallow, having a gravelly bed which permits the redd or nest to be constructed, while deep pools in the vicinity allow the breeding fishes to retire into them for rest. The salmon ascends our rivers to a suitable spot, and in the gravel at the bottom of the stream constructs its redd, which work would seem to be the occupation of the female. She lies on one side, and, by moving her tail rapidly from one side to the over, fans up the gravel until she gradually sinks into a kind of trough, the male remaining near, ready to give battle to any intruder. Yor this purpose his lower jaw is furnished at this period with an offensive weapon in the shape of a cartilaginous, hook-like process. The female (waited upon by the male) now deposits her eggs in the trough she had made, and these are fertilized by the male, and subsequently covered with gravel to some feet in depth, the whole forming a redd. She now falls back into one of the deep pools, until she has acquired sufficient strength to again shed more eggs. During this period the salmon (similar to the shad and many other fishes) is indisposed to feed, and lives on the stock of fat it has laid up while resident in the sea. It has been computed that every female salmon deposits about nine hundred eggs to each pound of its weight, and that only nine hundred of these in every 17,000 shed in British rivers ever attain the parr stage. As might be anticipated, eggs deposited in a running stream are very liable to be carried away by the current, and the places selected by salmon for }: > SALMONIDA. 65 their redds are often the localities where trout have previously deposited their egos, which now become routed up and carried away down stream to be devoured by every hungry fish. The time that salmon eggs may take before they are hatched is subject to variations as great as from 35 to 148 days, which last period occurred at the Crystal Palace in experiments instituted there, and 144 in the Wenham Lake ice vaults. While acting upon previous experience, Mr. Youl succeeded in transmitting salmon eggs to the Antipodes in small boxes packed in ice, and which retarded hatching until the 145th day. Mr. Branden examined a redd that appeared to have been left dry, but on opening it found that a little water was trickling through the stones and gravel, which was sufficient to keep the ova healthy. Having scraped a hole, he obtained a considerable number of eggs, and these he transferred to a pail of water, where two-thirds hatched within periods varying from five minutes to twenty-four hours. About a week subsequently he returned to the same spot, and had another dig for salmon eggs (no rise having occurred in the river during the interval). He collected more, and putting them into the water, they hatched as the former ones had done. He very fairly advances that this may be a provision to prevent ova deposited in localities where the depth of the stream is lable to considerable fluctuations, from becoming lost or killed, as must occur unless a delay, to obtain a suitable time, could be provided for. For as the floods come and sweep up these redds, the imprisoned ova are let loose, at a time when they are ready to burst and the young to emerge. In fact, like the chrysalis, the eggs may be able to abide a suitable time. But salmon eggs, even in redds, are not permitted to rest in peace and hatch in security : they have many accidents to escape from and numerous enemies whose vigilance must be avoided. Not only may floods prematurely sweep away redds with their unripe eggs, but during the continuance of such, spawning fish are unable to avail themselves of their usual breeding grounds because they are too deep in the water. They consequently may have to shed their eggs in the stream, when they will become lost, or covered with mud, or else push higher up to where there will be more chance of their redds being left dry, and the ova perishing; even in their annual spawning grounds, where their eggs may have been deposited, severe seasons of drought may occasion most disastrous results. Irrespective of the seasons, the eggs have numerous water enemies, as the fresh water shrimp, which hunts out the nest, when they are merciless to the eggs, the larva of the may-fly and of the dragon-fly and even some birds as the dabchick. While swans and ducks enjoy nothing so much as the spawn of fishes, in which taste the vole or water-rat appears to coincide. Due to the many destructive agencies at work an ingenious plan of artificial hatching and rearing has been adopted with great success, while by regulating the water, droughts and floods are prevented, and many enemies are excluded which run riot among fish eggs left in a state of nature in our rivers. Supposing some young fish have come forth, it does not follow that the little ones are strong and healthy. The temperature of the water ought to range out of doors about 42° or 46°, nor permitted to sink below 35°, while if it reaches freezing point, such will most probably be fatal. Should it rise to 50° the eggs may become prematurely hatched: the higher the temperature the sooner the young appear, and the more weakly they may be expected to be. Sometimes the jaws are deformed in the fry, or the spinal column is curyed, even two fish may be connected together, like the Siamese twins: likewise two or even three heads have been seen fixed to one body. When these little fish emerge from the eggs they have a large bag (the umbilical vesicle) attached to their stomachs: this contains the nourishment which is to serve them for several (three to eight) weeks’ subsistence, and they do not commonly take in any food by the mouth until it is absorbed. Weighed down by it they lie quietly among the stones at the bottom of the stream and seek concealment from fish larger than themselves, water insects, and other enemies which now commence to feed on them. The salmon is rare in our rivers in comparison with the number of fry iI 5 66 PHYSOSTOMI. hatched, and which would be quite sufficient to form a good supply had they a chance in the battle for life in the lower waters. The paucity of these fish is due (excluding poaching) to three main causes: (1) Difficulty in the ascent of breeding fish owing to natural or artificial obstructions in the river; (2) immoderate netting; and (3) pollution of the water. It is commonly observed that the interests of the proprietors of salmon fisheries are not identical throughout the entire extent of the stream, occasioning a clashing of views which are inimical to the fisheries, and consequently to the general public. The proprietors of fisheries living in the higher waters of our rivers argue that pollutions are permitted unchecked access in the lower reaches, that immoderate netting is almost continuously carried on, giving the fish, except in the close time, but little chance of escape. Thus the upper proprietors see but few fish, excepting during the breeding season, when it is illegal to capture them. They are in a manner “ clucking hens,” whose duties seem to be to take care the egos are hatched, rear the fry, and speed the parting guest as it descends to the sea, from whence nets and other obstructions and pollutions in the lower portions of the river will most probably prevent their ever re-ascending ; or else merely in sufficient numbers to maintain a sufficient supply for the lower waters. Official statistics are misleading, as they ought to show the yearly quantity of salmon taken in each portion of every river, not the number of boxes of salmon received at Billingsgate. It cannot be a source of surprise if the breeding grounds are not strictly preserved: for the rearing of salmon is asserted to be done at the expense of the local fish, which are residents of the upper waters. A. Deciduous teeth on the body of the vomer, which are usually shed at an early age (Salmones). ‘ a. About eleven rows of scales in an oblique line from the adipose dorsal fin to the lateral-line. 1. Salmo salar,* Plate CX, fig. 1 (old), 2 (young), and CXI, fig. 1. Salmo, Salv. p. 100; Aldrov. iv, p. 483; Belon. De Aquat. i, p. 277, c. fig. ; Johns Rises Wyaijet. 1, C4, p. 1005 t) xxa, f 12% Rondel. De Pisces Wiuyaspa tae Willugh. p. 189, t. N 2, fig. 1,2; Schonev. p. 64; Gesner, De Aquat. p. 969; Ray, p. 63, and pl. exi, fig. 1. Salmo, no. i, Artedi, Synon. p. 22, and Spec. p. 48; Linn. Faun. Suec. p. 115. Salmo, no. 2, Artedi, Species, p. 50. Sawmon, Duham. Peches. ii, p. 192, pl. i, f.1, 2. Salmon, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (ed. 1776) iii, p- 284, pl. lviii, f. 143 and (ed. 1812) iui, p. 382, pl. lxix. Samlet, Pennant, 1. c. (ed. 1776) iti, p. 303, pl. lix (ed. 1812) ii, p. 404, pl. Ixx. Salmo salar, Linn. Syst. Nat. i, p. 509; Miller, Prod. Zool. Dan. p. 48; Bloch, i, p. 175, t. xx (female) t. xcviii (male); Gmel. Linn. p. 1364; Bl. Schn. p- 398; Lacép. v, p. 159; Turton, Brit. Fauna, p. 103; Bonn. Hncy. Ich. p. 159, pl. lxv, f. 261, 262 ; Fleming, Brit. Anim. p. 179; Faber, Fische Isl. p. 156 ; Nilsson, Skan. Fauna, Fisk. p. 370; Jardine, Hdin. New Phil. Journ. vii, p. 46, and Brit. Salmonide, pl. i, ii, vii and viii; Richards. Faun. Bor. Amer. Fish. p. 140, pl. xci, f. 1 (head); Jenyns, Manual, p. 421; Yarrell, Brit. Fish. (Hd. 1) ui, p. 1, c. fig. (Ed. 2) ii, p. 1 (Hd. 3) i, p. 155; Parnell, Fish. Firth of Forth, p. 118, pl. xxx, xxxi, and xxxii, f. 1, 2; Agassiz, Poiss. d’eau douce, pl. 1 and 11; Swainson, Fishes, ii, p. 287; White, Catal. p. 74; Gronoy. ed. Gray, p. 151; Kréyer, Dan. Fiske, ii, p. 540; Mitchill, Fauna New York, p. 434; De Kay, p. 241. pl. xxxviii, fig. 122; Thompson, Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p. 143; Schlegel, De Dieren. p. 126, pl. xiii, f. 1; Blanchard, Poiss. France, p. 448; Gunther, Catal.vi, p. 11; Collett, Norges Fiske, p. 155; Malm, Fauna, p. 534; Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 525. Salmo salmo, Cuv. and Val. xxi, p. 169, pl. 614. Salmo ‘salmulus, Ray, p. 63; Turton, Brit. Fauna, p..104; Jardine, |. c. xviii, p. 56; Jenyns, Manual, p. 426; Parnell, Wern. Mem. vn, p. 278, pl. xxxil, fig. 1 and pl. xxx, and Fish, Firth of Forth, p. 138, pl. xxxii (young). Salmo nobilis, Olats. Isl. Reise, 1, p. 83; Pallas, Zoo. Rus. Asiat. i, p. 342, * The literature belonging to this fish is so extensive that it has been necessary to omit a large number of references. SALMONID i. 67 Salmo hamatus, Cuv. Régne Anim.; Cuv. and Val. xxi, p. 212, pl. 615. Salmo gracilis, Couch, Report, Royal Cornwall Polytee. Soc. 1859 and Fish. Brit. Isles, iv, p. 216, pl. eexvi. Salmo argenteus, Giinther, Catal. vi, p. 86 (not Cuv. and Val.). Salmon, Russell, 1864, pp. 234; Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, iv, p. 163, pl. cexi. B. xi-xii, 13-14 (8+), P.14, V. 9, A. 11 (2:8)/0, C.19, L. 1. 120-125, L. tr. 22°28, Vert. 59-60, Coee. pyl. 53-77. Body rather elongate, with the abdominal profile more curved than that of the back. The proportions of one part of the body to the remainder vary consider- ably in this fish, thus in the young we find a comparatively large head and eyes, a short snout and rounded body, &c.: but as the adult stage is attained there is greater depth of the body due to a more prominent abdomen. After breeding, the kelts are recognizable by low, lanky bodies and long heads. The length of the head varies with age and sex, being comparatively slightly longer in the parr than in the female grilse or salmon, while in the male salmon it is longer than in the female. Length of head from 4; to 4¢ or even 5 in the parr and male salmon to 5 or 5¢ in the female salmon and grilse, while in barren males it is similar to what is seen in females, of caudal fin from 6 in the parr to 7} in the salmon, height of body, which is greatest beneath the origin of the dorsal fin, 43 to 5 in the total length. Hye—situated slightly in front of the middle of the length of the head (or in the middle of that length in breeding males) and comparatively much smaller in adult than in young fish: interorbital space convex and equal to about 2/3 the length of the postorbital portion of the head. Snout much pro- duced in the male, and during the breeding season the extremity of the lower jaw is provided with a strongly curved prominence which precludes the closure of the two jaws. The posterior extremity of the maxilla reaches to beneath the middle of the eye in the parr but beyond its posterior extremity in the adult: while it is comparatively wider in the young than in the adult. Opercle higher than wide, from about 1/5 more in the parr, or 1/4 in the grilse or young salmon, and 1/2 in large salmon: subopercle from 1/2 to 1/3 of the height of the opercle, while its posterior margin forms a semi-circular curve along with that of the opercle.* Preopercle with its angle rounded and having a rather distinct lower limb. Teeth—in a single row in the jaws and palatines, the pre- maxillary ones being rather stouter than those in the mandibles, while the maxillary and palatine ones are still smaller. In adults the teeth are often found to be larger in the jaws of males than in those of females. Head of the vomer without teeth, which are mostly in a single row along its body, and which are gradually lost at an early age, com- mencing from behind forwards, so that in a half-grown or adult salmon only 1 to 4 are present, the anterior 2 of which are occasionally in a double row: in the parr and smolt a double row exists along the body of the vomer which {| anteriorly is usually armed with 4 teeth placed in a single row. Three to six sharp curved teeth on each side of the tongue. /H%ms—Mature fish have the fins shorter and more rounded than is seen in sterile ones. The rayed dorsal fin is a little longer at its base than is its highest ray. Pectoral in adults as long as the head excluding the snout, and does not reach half-way to the ventral, whereas in the parr it extends 2/3 of the distance. Ventral in adults reaches half-way to the base of the anal in the parr 2/3, anal one-fourth higher than its base is long. The form of the caudal alters with sexual development: in the young parr it is deeply cleft (see pl. cx, f. 2) up to 2 or 24 feet in length, it is as a rule truncated, while with advancing age it becomes more square. Scales—in the caudal portion of the body they are larger in this than any other British species of the genus, there being from 11 to 12 rows in an oblique line running from behind the adipose dorsal fin downwards and * In Yarrell it is correctly cbserved that what distinguishes Salmo salar from all other species is the form of the opercular bones, which show a rounded outline to the posterior edge of the gill-covers, the longest diameter of which to the nose would be in a line through the eye, while in all othe British migratory species the same line would pass below the eye. 5 68 PHYSOSTOMI. forwards to the lateral-line. The skin on the back of old males both during and subsequent to the spawning season becomes thickened and spongy, causing the scales to be imbedded. Ccecal appendages varying from about 50 to 80. Colours.—In adults superiorly of a steel blue, becoming lighter on the sides and beneath. Mostly a few rounded or x-shaped spots scattered over the body above the lateral-line and upper half of the head, being more numerous in the female than in the male. Dorsal, caudal, and pectoral fins dusky black: ventral and anal white, the former grayish internally. Prior to entering fresh waters these fish are of a brilliant steel blue along the back which becomes changed to a muddy tinge when they enter rivers. After these fish have passed into fresh waters for the purpose of breeding, numerous orange streaks appear in the cheeks of the male, and also spots, or even marks of the same, and likewise of a red colour on the body. It is now termed a “red-fish.” The female, however, is dark in colour and known as a “ black-fish.” Smolts are bluish along the upper half of the body, silvery along the sides, due to a layer of silvery scales being formed over the trout-like colours, while they have darker fins than the yearling pink but similar lateral bands and spots (see pl. ex. fig. 2) which can be seen (as in the parr) if the example is held in certain positions of ight. Parr have two or three black spots only on the opercle, and black spots, also orange ones along the upper half of the body and no dark ones below the lateral-line, although there may be orange ones which are seen along its course. Along the side of the body are a series (12 to 15) of transverse bluish bands wider than the ground colour and crossing the lateral-line, while in the upper half of the body the darker silvery colour of the back forms an arch over each of these bands. A row of spots along the middle of the rayed dorsal fin, and the adipose orange tipped. Varieties—Although among the British Salmonide, when not kept in any unnatural condition, the salmon is perhaps the species in which the fewest variations are seen, still some, affecting either its form or its colour, are sometimes present. in form.—Are more commonly perceived among the young artificially hatched, two or even more heads may be found, one with three heads was born in the spring of 1879, but as soon as the yolk sac was absorbed the fish died (Anglers’ Note Book, p.79). Arrests of development, as of the upper or under jaw, of one or more fins, or other portions of the body, or spinal curvatures are occasionally observed. It may be mentioned that fish salesmen and some fishermen believe they can tell from external appearances the river the various salmon have come from. Salmo argenteus, Giinther,* is a kelt-like form, its elongated condition being due to disease or starvation, probably the latter as it had been kept in afresh water pond. It is another form of Salmo gracilis, Couch. Degeneration in size when present may be quite distinct from degenera- tion in structure or function. In colour.—Occasionally quite brown salmon are captured in fresh waters, especially towards the close of the season, which would appear to be due toa prolonged fresh water residence. Mr. Ffennel recorded having captured them of a copper colour in the early lakes having the ova not very far advanced. Names.—Speaking generally this fish in its full-grown condition is known as the salmun; one on its second return from the sea is often termed a gerling in the Severn, or a botcher on its first return when under dlb. weight; although the more general designation is grilse; when under 2lb. weight it is usually termed salmon-peal by fishmongers. From one to two years old, before it has gone to the sea it is known as a parr, pink, smolt, smelt, salmon-fry, sprag, or salmon-spring (Northumberland), swmlet, brandling, fingerling, black-fin, blue-fin, shed, skegger, gravelling, hepper, laspring, gravel laspring, skerling, or sparling in Wales. 94: PHY SOSTOMI. noses, due apparently to rubbing or routing up the ground for eggs, but as such is not seen among unripe fish it is suggested that it may be occasioned by their searching for suitable places in which to form redds. At Sir J. Gibson-Maitland’s Howietown fishery, one fact was very patent, that the form of trout least alarmed at the presence of strangers was the Loch Leven, coming immediately to the surface for food, making the water bubble with their numerous forms, while they allowed themselves to be removed by means of a hand- net; the American charr kept more to the mid-water; but the common brook- trout were so cunning that the very sight of a net caused them to dive down and remain at the bottom. It may be that this difference in character is due to inherited instinct and that by the time the Loch Leven trout have been exposed to capture for several generations they will be as crafty as the Salmo fario has now become. Some of the young raised at Howietown are observed to take on cannibal propensities, if small their colour becomes yellow, their teeth abnormally developed, while they rapidly augment in size. At Loch Leven during the breeding season these fishes are observed to push up rivers to deposit their spawn, and in these localities the young are hatched and the parr reared. In fact its habits appear to be migratory to a qualified extent, the parr not leaving the burns for the loch until they are from ten to eighteen months of age. Knox found that they were filled with entomostraca in the month of January, but that during the remainder of the year they lived on Buccinum : at Howietown they thrive on clams, horseflesh, or even vegetable diet. If we turn to Sir Robert Sibbald’s History of Kinross-shire, compiled about a hundred and seventy years ago, we read ‘“‘Loch Leven abounds with fine fish, such as salmon taken in summer;’ while showing to how recent a date anadromous forms have been recorded there, we find in Graham, “ General view of the agriculture of Kinross and Clackmannan,” published towards the commence- ment of the present century, that among other fishes ‘‘ flounders are also found in Loch Leven.’”’ These instances agree with the general traditions of that part of the country, that marine fish formerly had free ingress into and egress from Loch Leven, but when this ceased is questionable. Prior to 1830 the loch covered a superficial space of 4312 acres, but in the month of December that year it was reduced to 3043 acres by the completion of a drainage scheme, promoted partly by landowners in the vicinity to reclaim land and partly by mill owners on the river Leven to give a regular supply of water to their mills. Through the new cut the water has since been carried, reducing the level of the loch nine feet below what it previously stood at. Sea fish cannot possibly obtain ingress, a matter of not so much consequence, as the bleach and other works on the river render the water too poisonous for any fish to pass up them alive. These drainage works do not appear to have proved beneficial to the trout in the loch, where from 1846 to 1855 the captures principally taken by net averaged annually 13,200, subsequent to which I have not obtained the figures until 1872, when 18,000 were taken by anglers and 2000 by net: and in 1873, when 13,394 were taken by the rod. Latterly this loch has been much frequented by anglers, and as the fish (probably due to the excessive lowness of the burns), appear now to be less favourable for breeding, artificial stocking has been resorted to. Sir J. Gibson-Maitland (Field, Sept. 23rd, 1882) shows the results of dpdhine this loch from his establishment at Howietown :— 1875, fry turned in 9000: captures 5093: average weight each 1113 lb. 1S 76 MuE 4 500004) er eneoo Te oe hieoscaes 1S Aa e700008 ei uGoeGe uae liye s EOUIUIES UG ZSea MME iin edPi sac, Cag IOV es GPP cae Ib, 1879 ,, ” none : » 21,491: ” re) ” 777 Ib. 1880 ,, Py enone. #95042): - . oe OOM as Ton were a imstioneaeyy aoe UG cil nih, fe 2 ae IeOB OME 1882 Emits 4 GHOlge i ? It is pointed out that it takes two seasons for the fry to attain to a size worth taking, a conclusion which agrees with the figures, also that with the increased captures at first there is a diminution in the weight of the individual fish. SALMONID A. 95 Breeding.—Similar to the brook-trout, at Loch Leven they ascend the streams for this purpose towards the end of September or commencement of October. Sir J. Gibson-Maitland crossed the ova of the Loch Leven trout with the milt of the sea-trout in the winter of 1881, and 95 per cent. were hatched. It appears to me that the progeny will not be hybrids, but merely two varieties of one form breeding together with the result of non-migratory Loch Leven trout haying perhaps more migratory instincts. Before passing on to the next species, I cannot resist remarking upon the magnificent fish-breeding establishment at Howietown, raised by the energetic skill and capital of Sir J. Gibson-Maitland. Here, although charr and brook- trout are reared, it is the Loch Leven trout that is more especially cared for. The hatching-houses are capable of hatching and raising 12,000,000 eggs and young fry up to the period when they can feed themselves, when they are transferred to the rearing-ponds, which are in a regular series, so that each year’s produce is kept by itself. To show what good management and judicious skill may effect, I would instance the pond for the six-year old fish, 80 yards by 40 yards, with a stream passing through it: here, when I visited this interesting establishment, were 1200 Loch Leven trout from 4 to 7 lb. weight each, and all in excellent con- dition, conclusively demonstrating how watery wastes can be turned into excellent food-producing reservoirs. If the experiment proves a financial success, as appears highly probable, its owner hopes to see similar institutions elsewhere, which would be the means of extending to an almost unlimited extent the fish-producing properties of the country now so lamentably wasted, from the apathy of the owners, the greed of the fishermen and the want of energy and knowledge in our legislators. Diseases.—These fishes are affected with disease similarly to the salmon and the trout, while bay-salt has been used with success at Howietown in order to arrest a fungus which has from time to time appeared in the ponds. I was informed that crows after having eaten diseased fish moulted and became most miserable objects and three or four were thought to have become leprous. As food.—The Loch Leven trout is generally very highly esteemed, not only for the red colour of its flesh, but because it possesses a peculiar delicacy of flavour. Habitat—This non-migratory fresh water trout is found in Loch Leven in Fifeshire, and other lochs in the south of Scotland and the north of England; while due to the success of the artificial fish-breeding at Howietown the variety is being extended all over the kingdom to as far south as Hampshire. Whether in a few years all trace of them will have been lost, and they will assume the colour and proportions of the brook-trout, only time can demonstrate. In the English edition of Linneeus incorporated into the Encyclopedia Londinensis, p. 53, it is observed, “that it is not above fifty years ago that Mr. Copland conveyed perch into the Ken-loch and the River Urr, where they have thriven remarkably well: as has been the case with the trout taken from the River Leven and deposited into Loch Long in the county of Renfrew.” While Parnell recorded haying met with this form so far north as Sutherlandshire. As to the size this fish attains, six-year-old examples, some weighing as much as 7 lb., were found at the Howietown ponds in 1882. In Loch Leven on April 27th, one 10 Jb. weight was netted; while in the New Statistical Account of Scotland mention is made of two examples captured previous to that date, one being nearly 9 1b., the other almost 18 lb. The example figured is 12 inches in length, and one of a pair sent me from Loch Leven by the late Mr. Alston. 2B. Salmo fario, Plates CIX, fig. 3, and CXIII, CXIV, and CXVI, fig. 1. Trutta fluviatilis, Will. p. 199; Ray, p. 65; Sibbald, Scot. Illus. no. 25. Trout, Pennant, Brit. Zool. (Hd. 1776) iii, p. 297, pl. lix, and (Hd. 1812) iii, p. 399, pl. Ixx. Salmo fario, Linn. Syst. Nat. i, p. 509; Bloch, Ich. t. xxii, xxiii; Gmel. Linn. p. 1367; Bl. Schn. p. 400; Turton, Brit. Fauna, p. 103; Bonn. Ency. Ich. 96 PHYSOSTOMI, p. 160, pl. lvi, f. 266; Donovan, Brit. Fishes, iv, pl. lxxxv; Risso, Ich. Nice, p. 322 and Eur. Mérid. i, p. 460; Flem. Brit. An. p. 181; Jardine, Edin. New Phil. Journal, xviii, p. 51 and Salmonide, t. v-xii; Richards. Faun. Bor. Amer. p. 144, pl. xcu, fig. 3; Jenyns, Manual, p. 424; Parnell, Wern. Mem. vii, p. 304, t. xxx, and Fish. Firth of Forth, p. 144, t. xxx; Kroyer, Dan. Fiske, ii, p. 625, c. fig.; Nilss. Skand. Faun. p. 415; White, Catal. p. 77; Gimther, Catal. vi, p- 59; Gronov. ed. Gray, p. 152; Giglioli, Catal. Pesce. Ital. p. 44; Steind. Ak. Wiss. ‘Wien. liu, 1866, p. 203. Salmo trutta, Lacépede, v, p. 189. Salmo fario, var. Forestensis, Bl. Schn. p. 400. Salar ausomi, Cuy. and Val. xxi, p. 319. Fario lemanus, Cuv. and Val. xxi, p. 300, pl. 617. Trutta fario, Siebold, Suss. w. f. p. 819; Canestrini, Fauna d’Itaha, Pesci, -p. 24; Moreau, Poiss. France, iii, p. 533. Variety a.—Salmo orcadensis, Plate CXIYV, fig. 1. The Salmon, Low, Fauna Orcad. p. 220. Salmo orcadensis, Ginther, Catal. vi, p. 91; Houghton, Brit. Freshwater Fishes, p. 121, ec. fig. “Mr. Low says, in the Loch of Stenness, Orkneys, is found the gray trout: also a trout of 36 lb. weight or more, along with the common trout, occurs both there and in Zetland.” This large form Richardson considered to be Salmo ferow, and Ginther a new species which he termed S. oreadensis. This loch is the largest in the Orkneys, about 9 miles long and 13 broad, fresh in the upper portion, brackish or even salt in the lower. Dr. Giinther defines this fish as ‘a non- migratory trout,’ very similar to S. nigripinnis, but distinguished from it by a broader and stronger maxillary, larger scales on the tail and a greater number (50) of pyloric appendages, instead of from 36 to 42, while S. ferow has at least 49. The teeth along the body of the vomer form a single or double row which are more or less persistent. Richardson was evidently Gorreet in associating ib with S. ferox possessing saline proclivities. Variety b.-—Salmo ferox, Plate CXVI, fig. 1, monstrosity. Salmo lacustris, Berkenhout’s Syn. Ed. 1795, i, p. 79, sp. 3. Salmo ferox, Jardine, Ency. Brit. (ed. 7) Art. Angling, p. 142, and Edin. New Phil. Journal, xviii, p. 55, and Salm. pl. iv; Jenyns, Manual, p. 425; Yarrell, (ed. 1) 11, p. 60, c. fig. (ed. 2) 11, p. 110 (ed. 3) 1, p. 288; Richards. Fauna Bor.- Amer. Fish, p. 144; Nilss. Skan. Faun. p. 412; White, Catal. p. 78; Gunther, Catal. vi, p. 92. Salar ferox, Cuv. and Val. xxi, p 338. Lake trout or Buddagh, Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, 1v, p. 299, This seems to be a trout which has taken on cannibal propensities (see page 94) and its food appears to be almost exclusively fish. It attains a large size, while Richardson alluded to a variety occurring in Loch Loyal, in Sutherland, of a purplish brown above, blackish gray beneath, and the entire body covered with dark sepia-coloured spots, smallest below the lateral-line. It is known as Buddagh or “big fat fellow”? in Lough Neagh and some parts of Ireland (Harris, Hist. Co. Down, 1744, p. 236), and is said to be a deep water form confined to lakes, seldom qmiien ne to rivers or to the sea, mostly taken by trolling, though sometimes with a fly. It has been known to return a ‘second or third time to the bait even after it has been dragged 40 or 50 yards. It ascends a short distance up rivers to spawn: Thompson found one from 10 to 12 lb. weight contained 4620 ova. Its flesh is of a dull orange colour and generally coarse. It has been found in the lochs of the north of Scotland and as far south as Ulswater and Derwentwater: also Llanberris in Wales, and in many Irish lakes as Lough Neagh, L. Melvin, lL. Hske, L. Erne, and most of the larger ones. Among our earlier British ichthyologists we find that Berkenhout termed the SALMONID A. 97 * oreat lake-trout’”’ S. lacustris (under which name it appears in Sampson’s Londonderry and Dubourdieu’s Co. Down), supposing it to be identical with the continental variety; but of late years differences have been asserted to exist between the British and foreign race. Jardine and Selby termed ours S. feroz, the specific name having been chosen to characterize its size and ferocious habits. Jurine believed in the specific identity of all the forms of trout in the Lake of Geneva; and it would be but reasonable to expect that if the British S. fario under favourable conditions could attain the size of S. ferox, the continental S. fario, which is the same species, would, under like conditions, also arrive at being a great lake-trout. Moreau (vol. iti, p. 534) places among the synonyms of Trutta (or Salmo) fario, “ La Forelle du Lac Léman, Fario Lemanus ;” and at p- 536 observes, ‘‘ La Truite féeroce, Trutta ferox, Valenc., des eaux du Foretz est une simple variété de la Truite vulgaire, et nullement une espéce particuliére.” Although these authors have, in my opinion, been perfectly correct, still there existed the statement of Dr. Giinther that structural differences existed among the specimens in the British Museum, showing that S. ferox possessed 56 to 57 vertebre and 43 to 49 ceca, while S. fario had 57 to 60 vertebree and 33 to 47 exca. I have, however, now shown (page 56) that examples of S. fario may have from 56 to 60 vertebree, and likewise from 33 to 54: ceeca ; thus overlapping the entire amount of variations ascribed to British forms. Sir William Jardine stated that “the dorsal fin in S. ferow contains 15 rays, and appears to be constant in that number ;” and that ‘in form it is generally shorter proportionally and deeper than in large specimens of 8. fario.” Sir J. Richardson distinguished between the great lake-trout and brook-trout by the size attained. The tail “in adults is perfectly square, or might even be described as slightly rounded at its extremity ; in the young it is slightly forked, and appears to fill up gradually as the fish advances inage.” The relative position of the fins and the number of rays in the dorsal, were said to vary from 2-4/11 or a total of from 13 to 15. Thompson observes that he found from 33 to 49 cxca in various examples of S. ferox from 12 to 17 inches in length. I possess undoubted examples of the common brook-trout having from 13 to 15 dorsal rays: Moreau likewise in French specimens of the brook-trout found 3 or 4 undivided and 9 to 11 divided rays in the dorsal fin: likewise 3 undivided and 7 to 9 divided anal rays: while as to the caudal fin being square in adults, so it also is in large examples of the brook-trout. Yarrell (ed. 3, 1, p. 281) gives an illustration of a large Thames trout (a locality not frequented by S. ferow according to authors), in which the caudal fin is as rounded as in any examples of great lake- trout of similar size. It was a male, 28 inches long, having a hooked lower jaw, while it weighed 11lb. The comparative length of the head and height of the body are almost identical with what obtains in an example of S. feroxv, 20 inches long, from Llanberris, and which is in the British Museum. I examined a few years since a specimen (which is still preserved) of trout, weighing upwards of 13 lb., taken from a large sheet of water at Alresford in Hampshire, which is well stocked with coarse fish. This was one of about a dozen that some years previously had been transferred from the contiguous stream, to which they could not subsequently obtain access. Without a history of from whence the fish came, I maintain that no ichthyologist could be certain whether any given specimen is or is not a “ great lake-trout.” “The trout,” says Dr. J. Davy, ‘when it feeds principally upon fish must be extremely active and strong; and consequently, from its predatory mobile habits, acquires large teeth, large fleshy fins, thick skin, and great pectoral fins for turning.” Variety c.—Salmo Cornubiensis, Plate CXIII, fig. 2. Trout, Borlase, Cornwall, p. 263, pl. xxvi, f. 1. Salmo Cornubiensis, Walb. Artedi, iii, p. 65; Bl. Schn. p. 421. This is a form mostly residing in small streams, and in which the parr finger marks are continued through life, unless under changed conditions it increases beyond its usual size, when these markings disappear. fod 7 98 PHYSOSTOMI. Variety d.Salmo nigripinnis, Plate CXV, fig. 2. Salmo nigripinnis, Ginther, Catal. vi, p. 96; Houghton, British Freshwater Fishes, p. 120, ce. fig. I now propose alluding to Salmo nigripinnis, Ginther, which is similar to S. Cornubiensis as described by Borlase, Artedi, etc., and which for many reasons may be considered as a variety which in suitable localities frequently developes into S. ferow. I have been most liberally supplied with specimens from Cardiganshire, through the kindness of Sir Pryse Pryse; and among them is one form which was alluded to by Barrington, in the Transactions of the Royal Society for 1774, as the “ Hog-backed Trout of Plinlimmon”’ (Plate CXI, fig. 1), which Dr. Giinther, as I believe correctly, considered identical with his 8. nigripinnis. My example, which is about 11 inches in length, is peculiarly interesting, as forming a link between S. nigripinnis and 8. ferox, pertaining partly to one form and partly to the other. The following are the differences noted in the British Museum Catalogue :— Salmo nigripinnis. D. 14, A. 12, P. 18, Cae. 36-42; Vert. 57-59. Head small. Snout not much pro- duced in males. No mandibular hook observed. Head of vomer with a trans- verse band of teeth, on body generally in a single series. Female mature at 7 inches. Largest example observed, 16 inches. Salmo ferox. D. 14, A. 10-11, P. 16, Cec. 44-49 ; Vert. 58-59. Head of moderate size. Snout much produced in males. Mandibular hook when spawning. Head of vomer small, toothless ; body with a double or zigzag line of teeth. Caudal truncated at 18 inches; in larger examples rounded. Female mature at 14 inches. Largest example observed, 31 inches. These reputed two species have been found residing in nearly or quite the same localities in England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland. The size of the speci- mens examined is important, as tending to modify the conformation of the opercular pieces, as well as of the fins, the character of the scaling, the propor- tionate diameter of the eye, and the existence or the reverse of the teeth on the front of the body of the vomer. The teeth being present on the anterior part of the body of the vomer in the smaller S. nigripinnis, but absent from the same place in the larger ones, S. ferow, is symptomatic of endentulation due to age. The same argument apples to the mandibular hook, it being well known that among the Salmonide this production is absent in young males, as may be readily observed in the parr which possess milt ready for shedding. The number of pectoral rays is immaterial, as I find, even in the British Museum specimens, examples of S. nigripinnis, S. ferow, and S. fario possessing from 13 to 15. The foregoing leaves the following as Dr. Giinther’s primary reasons for dividing these two so-called species:—S. nigripinnis has D. 14, A. 12; head of the vomer-toothed, and generally a single row along the body of that bone; caudal fin with pointed lobes. 8S. ferow: D. 13, A. 10-11 ;* no teeth on the head of the vomer, but a double row along the body of the bone; caudal fin truncated. The example of the “ hog-backed trout” in my collection has D. 14, teeth on the front portion of the body of the vomer, and a distinct lower limb to the preopercle, thus belonging to 8. nigripinnis. Likewise A. 11, a double line of teeth along the body of the vomer, and the caudal fin almost square at its extremity or becoming similar to what is given as diagnostic of S. ferow. I have likewise six smaller examples of 8. nigripinnis in which teeth are present on the front portion of the body of the vomer and in a zigzag line along the body of that bone; the caudal fin in the smallest has pointed lobes, which have become rounded in larger specimens; the ccecal appendages varied from 35 to 44. In some of these fish the posterior margin of the preopercle was * Thompson (iv, p. 157) found D, 13-14, A. 11-12. SALMONID 41. 57) rounded, and had no distinct lower limb. The maxilla was much feebler than seen in some other local races of brook-trout, which was remarkably the case on comparing it with a beautiful Yorkshire variety sent me by Mr. G. Brooks, F.1.s. ; but even among the Yorkshire specimens I found great differences to exist. These Cardiganshire fish in the Tivy are found to 4:lb. or 5 lb. weight, but rarely if ever take a fly when so large, but are to be caught by means of a minnow. Small ones removed to a pond attain in about 3 years to 3lb. or 3} 1b. in size, their flesh is pinkish, and their flavour said to be excellent. Out of 8 examples, 6 had no red spots, one had them along the lateral-line: and the last had them both on the lateral-line and in one or two rows below it.* If a trout, normally belonging to a small race, as 8. Cornubiensis, is transferred to a lake or reservoir, as in the one near Penzance, where food is plentiful, it attains a size to which it never reaches in its ancestral stream, showing capacity for growth to be inherent, and called into action by luxuriant living. In Scotland the largest examples are in lochs; so also in Wales and Ireland, although occasionally a large one may be found in a sluggish stream, especially if such passes over a rich soil. Should food be plentiful, a brook-trout may attain to many pounds in weight in suitable localities—in fact'to as large a size as the great lake-trout, which I hold to be merely a form of S. fario which indulges in luxurious living, or cannibal propensities. Variety e.-—Salmo estuarius, Plate CIX, fig. 3. Salmo estuarius, Knox, Zoologist, 1855, xiii, p. 4662. Salmo gallivensis, Ginther, Catal. vi, p. 88; Houghton, Brit. Freshwater Fishes, p. 105, c. fig. The most characteristic peculiarity of this form is said to be found in the small size of the ccecal appendages: also that it is at once recognized from Salmo trutta by the excessive shortness of the tubes on the lateral-line. Four examples were recorded and four more passing into the brook-trout, termed hybrids. It is similarly coloured to freshwater forms. Knox’s example had sixty vertebra, similar to the number present in the British Museum specimen, and the name he gave well denotes the chief characteristic of this variety. The example figured is 19 inches long, and came from Waterford. Mr. J. Harvie-Brown took in June, 1882, from a sea-pool or fish-pool at the mouth of the river, freshwater at low tide, salt or brackish at high-water, brown-river trout, periodically visiting the brackish localities, and taking on a silvery sheen of scales, much as he found them in North Uist. They are said to lose condition about spawning time, then disappear but not to ascend streams to breed. Couch alludes to Knox’s estuary trout and observes upon its being a fish which has gone to the sea, and that he had received examples migrating seawards in May towards the deep. Variety 7—Salmo stomachicus. The Gillaroo, Barrington, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. 1774, lxiv, p. 116; Watson, l.c. p. 121; Hunter, 1. c. p. 210; Sowerby, Brit. Misc. t. xi; Yarrell, Brit. Fish, (ed. 3) i, p. 283; Thompson, Nat. Hist. Ireland, iv, p. 154; Couch, Fish. Brit. Isles, iv, p. 240, pl. ccix. Salmo stomachicus, Ginther, Catal. vi, p. 95: Houghton, Brit. F. W. Fishes, p- 125, ¢. fig. This has been considered distinct, due to the abnormal thickness of the middle coat of its stomach, otherwise, observes Mr. Barrington, there are no exterior marks by which the species can be distinguished from the common trout. Pennant asserted that the increased thickness of the stomach proceeds from the Superior quantity of shell-fish which it finds in the waters it inhabits, and which may call more frequently for the use of its comminuting powers than is requisite * I intend depositing all these forms, along with my British collection of fish, in the South Kensington Museum. 7 # 100 PHYSOSTOMI. in those of our trout. Thompson (1. c.) observes that the coats of other species of Salmones than S. fario (of which only the Gillaroo is set down as a variety) become muscular from the same cause. Healluded to having found it in S. ferow. Sir J. Richardson observes :—‘‘ We may here note the existence of a strongly-marked and peculiar variety, called the Gillaroo trout of Galway. It is remarkable for feeding on shell-fish, in consequence of which (it is supposed) the coats of the stomach acquire a great degree of thickness, from which peculiarity it is sometimes called the gizzard trout.’”* Sir H. Davy remarks that “ the charr of the lakes of Southern Austria feeding similarly (to the Gillaroo trout) have a like thick stomach.” It generally prefers a rocky bottom, and is said to breed in lakes in their shallower parts, and not to ascend rivers for this purpose. But it is found in the Shannon, Lough Corrib, Lough Mask, Lough Derg, Lough Melyin, &c. The colours of this variety may be due to the character of the food it indulges in, while in some localities its flavour is considered excellent, in others quite the reverse. In Lough Melvin it is somewhat hog-backed, fine in colour, and well flavoured: in Lough Derg, soft, colourless, and inferior. Its stomachs are occasionally served up in Ireland as gizzards. Thompson obtained from the stomach of one example, about 8 inches long, above 1000 shells of Limneus pereger, Valvata obtusata, and a few Cyclas cornea. Stoddart observes : this variety is found in a small tarn or loch, situated on a shoulder of Ben More, in Sutherlandshire, about three miles from Innisnadamph, named Mulach Corry. Variety g.—Swaledale trout. Plate CXV, fig. 1. B. xi, D.12-13 (,2345) | 0, P.113-14, V. 9, A. 10-11 (48,), L. 1. 125, Coe. pyl. 35. This variety, which is comparatively rather broad, was given me by Mr. G. Brooks, F.L.8., who informs me that it is found in Oxnop Beck, Swaledale, Yorkshire. The example figured is a female 10 inches in length. There is a considerable difference in the form and proportions of the several examples. Colours—it is the most beautifully-tinted form that I have seen, being finely studded with black dots placed in a light circle, and likewise with numerous blue marks and red spots. Its dorsal fin is finely spotted, but the white anterior edge, so constant in most freshwater forms, is indistinct or absent. Scales—fifteen rows between the posterior edge of the base of the adipose dorsal in a line passing downwards and forwards to the lateral-line. Stomach thickened and similar to the variety termed Gillaroo, which form, Dr. Giinther observes, possesses forty-four cceca, consequently if a variation in the number of such are diagnostic of distinct species, this is a variety of the Gillaroo. Respecting its exact habitat, Mr. Brooks observes that the upper part of the beck runs over millstone grit, but as it leaves the moor it gets upon mountain limestone, and from this point, for a mile and a half, to the point where it joins the Swale, it is composed of numerous small falls, with intervening little dark pools in which the trout lie. The. beck is overhung all the way (on the limestone) by trees, mostly alder, silver birch and hazel, but with a good sprinkling of elm, mountain ash, &c. The beck is closely overhung and is in a narrow ravine. Variety h.—Crassapuill trout. B. xi-xiii, D. 12-13 G254,) | 0, P. 14, V. 10, A. 11 (8), L. 1. 125, Lh. 4. 27/82. Six examples of this exceedingly interesting variety were sent me by Mr. Harvie-Brown in June, 1882. They were taken in Sutherlandshire, at Loch Crassapuil, where they are looked upon as land-locked sea-trout. Their fin rays are similar to those of Salmo levenensis ; a transverse row of teeth is present across the anterior portion of the vomer, and a double row along its body. The preopercle has a distinct lower limb in some, indistinctin others, while the shape of the subopercle * Hunter’s experiments with hard and soft food on gulls, showed thickening of the muscular wall of the stomach occurred due to increased use. SALMONID Zh. 101 varies. J%ns—the pectoral is as long as the head excluding the snout, it is not quite so pointed as in the Loch Leven form, nor so rounded as in the common brook-trout, but intermediate between the two. Scales—125 rows along the lateral-line, 15 from the base of the adipose dorsal to the lateral-line, 25 from the lateral-line to the base of the ventral fin. Cacal appendages 46 in the one examined. Length of head 42 to 5 in the total length. Colowrs—silvery, with the upper two thirds of the body and head closely covered with x-shaped or round black spots, and in two of the examples a few red spots but mostly confined to the lateral-line. The loch has a pure white sandy bottom, which probably accounts for their silvery colour. When fresh caught their backs are of a vivid green, varying to pale sea-green and dark olive, in accordance with the depth of the water in which they live. Dorsal fin covered with black spots. These fish have the silvery appearance of anadromous forms, and externally strongly resemble the Loch Leven variety, but the number of ccecal appendages is different, being almost identical with that observed in a Loch Leven example raised at Howietown, and one step nearer removed from its marine ancestry than is the true S. levenensis. Did this species run up rivers, doubtless they would take on the colours of the brook-trout, as they have its dentition. They attain to 3 lb. or 4 1b. weight. Mr. J. Harvie-Brown (Land and Water) observes that at a far inland locality in Sutherlandshire, brown trout, dark and spotted, were caught in 1877, and introduced to a chain of lochs in the same county, which have their sources in innumerable springs of clear water from granite and limestone mountains (principally the former, as the limestone, for the most part, is at a lower level). These fish became, in a single year, silvery and covered with minute bright scales like sea-trout, and grew to the size of 1 lb. weight in twelve months, from at most z ofalb. The food in the loch is shell-fish and tadpoles, and the bottom granite, gravel, and sand. Monstrosities.—Hog-backed trout of Plinlimmon, Cambridge Quart. Mag. 1833, p- 891; Cobbold, Edinb. New Phil. Journ. ii, 1855, pl. vi. B. xu, D. 12-15 (854) | 0, P. 13-15, V. 9, A. 10-12 (485), C. 19, Ll. 243425 Vert. 57-60. Length of head 4¢ to 42 (in old breeding males 33), of caudal fin 7 to 72 height of body 4¢ to 5 in the total length. Head much more pointed in some forms than in others. Hyes—diameter 4} to 6 in the length of the head, varying with the size and age of the specimen, 1} to 2 diameters from the end of the snout and the same apart. In old breeding males the eyes are comparatively smaller, and as much as 3 or 3} diameters from the end of the snout and also apart. Teeth—in a double zigzag row along the body of the vomer, and in a transverse row across the anterior portion of that bone where it is joined with the palatine arch. F’ins—the first dorsal (except in old breeding males), as a rule, commences some- what nearer to the suout than to the base of the upper caudal ray; the height of the anterior ray usually exceeds the length of its base. Origin of adipose dorsal fin about midway between the anterior insertion of the base of the rayed dorsal and the posterior extremity of the upper caudal lobe. Pectoral as long as the postorbital portion of the head, or even of the entire head excluding the snout, in some examples it is more pointed than it is in others. Ventral inserted beneath the middle or last third of the base of the dorsal fin. Caudal forked in the very young, emarginate in those of a medium size, becoming square in large examples, or even rounded. Scales—from 13 to 15 rows between the hind end of the adipose dorsal fin in a row passing downwards and towards the lateral-line. About 26 or 27 rows from the lateral-line to the base of the ventral fin. Cecal appendages—these differ considerably, apparently being influenced to a great extent by the locality they inhabit and the food which they can obtain. Colowrs—these vary as has already been observed (see page 57), not only with locality but also owing to changes of food. Those from Wales and along the S.W. coast are of a somewhat darker appearance than those from the Midland counties and towards the north, and have rather more black but less red spots. 102 PHYSOSTOMI. I have already (p. 57) alluded to the parr marks of the young being occasionally continued throughout life in small forms, evidently adding to the confusion respecting what is a parr. Varieties.—Trout, as already remarked, are exceedingly liable to variation, due to several causes. Some of these abnormal productions would seem to be hereditary ; in others the same exciting cause continuing in action occasions results aS in previous generations. Giraldus Cambrensis, lib. i, c. x, the Archdeacon of Brecon, who attended Baldwin, Archbishop of Canterbury, in a progress through Wales in 1188, tells us of eels, trout and perch existing in the lakes of Snowdon which only possessed the right eye, but being invariably blind with the left. The Fischau, near Mandorf in Germany, was reputed to contain blind trout (Fr. Ern. Bruckmanni Epist. Itin. xxxvyi, Wolfenb. 1734, p. 10). A deformed race of trout is asserted to exist in a small loch in Invernesshire near Pitmain; among them there appears to be an arrest of develop- ment in the upper jaw, giving their heads a slight resemblance to those of bulldogs, due to the projection of the lower jaw (Encye. Brit. 7th ed., art. Ang.). Similar malformations are seen in the “ground trout” of Penyghent (Yorkshire Vertebrata) and many other places. In Loch Islay exists a race of tailless trout, Salmo Islayensis, Thomson (Traquair, Journ. Anat. Phy. vi, p. 411, pl. xix, and Thompson, Science Gossip, 1872, p. 85), which in some streams has been traced to be due to the action of deleterious matter in the water (see Angler’s Note Book, 1880, p. 66). Mr. J. Harvie-Brown observed, about 1876, in the river Carron that a contraction of the rays of the tail fins of the trout commenced, due it was - universally believed to continuous pollution of the water through the agency of paper mills. At Malham Tarn, in Yorkshire, 1240 feet above sea level, the trout are distinguished by a deficiency or malformation of the gill-covers in about one in every fifteen captured. As I have seen the same result from breeding in confined places, I believe such to be one at least of the causes, perhaps conjoined with gill-fever when young. On Plinlimmon, and in adjacent parts of Wales, are ‘“hunch-backed ” trout, having deformed vertebral columns as already alluded to. In some, at least, of these instances the young are reared where cascades are falling over heights into a series of pools, and it has seemed to me not unlikely that either the egg or the fry coming within the reach of such, might suffer injury, and consequent disease of the spine (so common in fishes) be set up. Barrington (Phil. Trans. 1767) remarking upon some examples crooked near the tail continues, “these trout are only caught in a small basin, eight or nine feet deep, which the river forms after a fall from the rocks.” Perch were found to be similarly affected, the same cause acting apparently on both forms. There are likewise races in which some Jocal cause has set up local action, as of the stomach alone. This variety, the Gillaroo (see page 99), due to the food it indulges in, has the muscular coat of its stomach thickened, which abnormal structure has been reproduced in succeeding generations. For it must not be assumed, because in certain examples we are unable to find Limnea and other shells, that the fish has never consumed any ; they may have been digested, or it may have varied its food, or the shells may have been temporarily unobtainable. In County Derry, in the river Glenlark in the Munterloney Mountains, “Mr. Sinclaire states that the water and stones are deeply tinged with a rust colour, of which the trout likewise partake. Their flesh is very bad and of a metallic flavour; so bad are they that the country people will not eat them, and as they are not fished for, the river abounds in them” (Thompson, iv, 153). Lunel remarking upon the various specific names that had been given to the varieties of this species, asserted Salmo fario, S. lemanus, S.rappti and S. lacustris, of Lake Constance to belong to one form which he proposed terming 8S. variabilis. Steindachner (Ak. Wiss. Wien, lii, 1865, Nov. 30th) identified S. detex, Heck. with S. fario. Pavesi (Pesci nel Ticino) considered the lake and river-trout of the Canton to be merely varieties of one species. ‘‘ Unquestionably,” observes Stoddart (Angler’s Companion, 1847, p. 3), “there exists no species of fish which, judging of it by the external marks, holds claim to so many varieties as the common freshwater-trout. In Scotland almost every lake, river, and SALMONIDA. 103 streamlet possesses a breed peculiar in outward appearance to itself.”’ Lord Home (Yarrell’s Fishes) observes of two streams, the Whitadder and its tributary the Blackadder, that the first flows along a very rocky and gravelly bed, while the latter rises in mosses, also goes through them in the first half of its course, but subsequently along a rich and highly cultivated district. The trout in the first are silvery in colour: while those from the Blackadder are dark with orange fins. The many varieties are dependent upon external causes and chiefly to the abundance or the reverse of food and the nature of the water they reside in, the soil over which it flows, and other causes already treated of (pp. 57, 58). That this conclusion is based upon proof may be demonstrated by the result of what has become of the progeny bred from the brook-trout eggs taken in Hampshire or Bucks, by Buckland or Francis, and transmitted in 1866 to Tasmania, some of which have become great lake-trout. Mr. Arthur (Trans. Otago Institute, July 9th, 1878) tells us that unlike the Scotch trout which according to Stoddart show a yearly increase of about one-third of a pound in weight,* in Otago they grow so rapidly and are so fat that they have reached an average yearly increment of from 1 lb. to 23 1b. Already the various streams have stamped the trout with local peculiarities: in some they are plump almost to deformity ; their proportions are not constant neither are their colours. He tells us that examples were said to have been seen up to 20 lb. in weight. This year, 1882, one 31 inches long and weighing 19 lb. was caught at Temuka, its flesh was of a pale orange: last year Mr. Gwatkin captured one in Canterbury, that turned the scale at 21 1b. The foregoing facts corroborate my views that all our forms of trout are varieties of one species, and the so-called hybrids are not mules but mongrels, being the result of the crossing of varieties. Consequently, sterility need not be anticipated ; but, on the contrary, improvement is more likely to ensue (should there be no deficiency in food) than when the stock is bred in and in. It also tends to show that where small, but not malformed, breeds of trout exist, riparian proprietors had far better investigate the condition of the food- supply and nature of the waters in their streams than rely upon the introduction of larger races. Jor, sooner or later, new stock will become indistinguishable from the original local breed in colour, form, and size. Hybrids.—That hybrids exist among the Salmonide and can be artificially produced by the pisciculturist,+ I have already pointed out (p. 59). It was with much interest that I received in July, 1882, from Sir Pryse Pryse an undoubted hybrid between the brook-trout and the American charr (Salmo fontinalis). The example was 9 inches long, having the number of rows of scales descending to the lateral-line intermediate between the twoforms; the fins similarly modified, while a row of teeth passed in an irregular manner along the body of the vomer. The organs of generation were undeveloped, the example for this season at least was certainly sterile ; some American charr of about the same size, received a few days subsequently from Howietown, had the eggs and milt in a forward condition. Names.—Aller-jloat or aller trout, this refers to a large one frequenting a hole in a retired or shady portion of a brook under the roots of an alder tree. In Herefordshire there is a country proverb respecting the “aul” or “alder :” “When the bud of the aul is as big as a trout’s eye Then that fish is in season, in the river Wye.” * “ A correspondent of the New Sporting Magazine, for November, 1840, observes that a friend of his has kept trout in a kind of store stream, and having fed them with every kind of food, has had some increase from 1 1b. to 10 1b. in four years. Mr. Toomer placed a trout of 34 1b. which he caught in the river in a stew, and in about four years it had grown to about 9 lb.” (Daniel, Rural Sports). At Howietown, a Loch Leven trout hatched in 1875 weighed over 8 Ib. in October, 1882. ¢ At Sir J. Gibson-Maitland’s, November 14th, 1882, I was given a living hybrid 11 inches long, it was the produce of a Loch Leven female milted from a salmon on November 25th, 1879, and hatched in 1880, consequently nearly three years old, in fact a sterile grilse. 1250 living parrs in the boxes up to 4 inches in length, were the produce of 20,000 eggs of Loch Leven female trout milted from the salmon, December 24th, 1881, and hatched March 9th, 1882. Their dorsal fins had the anterior white edge usually seen in the brook-trout. One had 78 ccecal appendages, a second 61. 104 PHYSOSTOMI. Rack (Northumberland) also rack-rider, a small trout: Shot (Westmoreland). Breac-precht, Highlands of Scotland.