, as C TFA Qt és a pies A ee, SORT Oe re meen me ame = cenee ae a PET remem ng eye meat enmwe om oe op : . . , ‘ . = : atten a . _ Sp na atm ~~ 4 } ; 1 y [= 2 i] a =z = Z S) D Be E a w My fy oa ee ee ee Se ed oe, oe aie ee - s , a f = i = : 7; 1 4 f a —— 4 os = ‘ \ ~ ' ta = s> i x ° = > ’ pats SES Wi. O26 1V4 Ohio State Academy of Science 4 BM BM Special Papers No. 4. M BM # The Fishes of Ohio #& BY RAYMOND C. OSBURN, M. Sc. Bog Published by the Academy of Science with the Emerson McMillin Research Fund. ? x « May, 1901 x x Monograph Ohio State Academy of Science. SPECIAL PAPERS, No, 4. The Fishes of Ohio. BY RAYMOND C. OSBURN, M. Sc. PUBLISHED BY THE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE WITH THE EMERSON McMILLIN RESEARCH FUND. Pye? 1007. COLUMBUS: PRESS OF SPAHR & GLENN, Igor. : 2k aes NOTE. The investigations upon which this paper is based were made under two grants of fifty dollars each from the Emerson McMillin Research Fund, and the results are now published by the further aid of the same fund. F. M. WEBSTER, H. C. BEARDSLEE, WILLIAM R. LAZENBY, Trustees. DEDICATION. To the memory of my dear friend and teacher, the late Professor David Simons Kellicott. ae ery Te Pi) wu) ? Ake WU y Ti os r i ‘il i 4 . t . oe ’ v F ‘ . i U i 1 J . u. i 1 ‘ nye a \ 4 Dit FISHES“OF OHLO, An Authenticated List, with Especial Reference to Occurrence and Distribution. INTRODUCTION. HE purpose of this work is to bring together the results of 53 the investigations on the fishes of Ohio, which have from time to time been made in various localities within the state, and to compile an authenticated list of the fishes of Ohio, which shall include only such species as have been defin- itely reported for the state by some collector. An attempt has also been made to show the distribution in the state, of each species, by citing all the records of occurrence which could be obtained. ‘The results show that many species are so widely dis- tributed and so abundant that they have been taken by every collector in the state ; some are widely distributed, but nowhere common; others have been taken commonly in one or two locali- ties, but not elsewhere; and still others are so rare that only single individuals have been recorded. Before proceeding with the list it may be of interest to glance at the work of some of the collectors of Ohio fishes, as shown by their publications. The work in the Ohio Valley was begun by C. S. Rafinesque, in a paper dated at Louisville, Kentucky, July 20, 1818. This paper was followed by a number of others in rapid succession, and in December, 1819, to November, 1820, Rafinesque pub- lished in a series of articles in the ‘‘ Western Review and Miscel- laneous Magazine,’’ his ‘‘ Ichthyologia Ohiensis,’’ which, as Dr. Call says, ‘‘laid the literary foundation of American Ichthyologi- cal Science.’’ As Rafinesque’s paper covered the Ohio River System, it is not definitely known how many species he took within the limits of Ohio, but he mentions about twenty-five 6 | THE FISHES OF OHIO. species as occurring in the streams of the state, Muskingum, Hocking and Miami Rivers and the Ohio River “‘as far as Pitts- burgh.’’ Rafinesque makes mention of one hundred and eleven species as occurring in the Ohio and its tributaries, but of this number, as Dr. Jordan says, ‘‘ upwards of forty-three are either spurious or redundant.’’ Of the one hundred and thirty-four native species now recorded for Ohio, Rafinesque described thirty- four. Further comment on Rafinesque’s work is unnecessary, as it has been reviewed by various later writers, especially by Dr. Jordan. -Dr. R. E. Call has recently published an edition of the Ichthyologia Ohiensis in the original text, accompanied by a biographical sketch. The first paper to appear, ene entirely with the fishes of the state, was that by Dr. Jared P. Kirtland, published in the Second Annual Report of the Geological Survey of Ohio, and bearing date of November 1, 1838, at Cincinnati. In this paper Dr. Kirtland gave a list of seventy-two species belonging to Ohio. Of this number, at least twelve are redundant. In the ‘‘ Family Visitor,’’ of 1850, however, Kirtland gave a corrected list, in which seven doubtful species of his former list were omitted, and two other species added, thus reducing his list to sixty-seven species, of which number at least sixty-one are good. Kirtland published other papers on Ohio fishes, his most important work being ‘‘ Descriptions of the Fishes of Lake Erie, the Ohio River and their Tributaries,’? which appeared in the ‘‘ Boston Journal of Natural History,’ as a serial, in 1840-46. Hight species of our present list were described by Dr. Kirtland, and his careful work resulted in many valuable contributions to ichthyological knowledge. ‘The next work of importance on Ohio fishes was that of Mr. John H. Klippart, of the State Fish Commission, published in the first and second annual reports of the commission. The first report, for the years 1875-76, contains descriptions of twenty-five species ‘‘ copied and arranged from the manuscript of Prof. D. 5S. Jordan, by his assistant, Chas. H. Gilbert,’’ with comments and notes by Klippart, and with plates of nineteen species drawn by Miss Josephine Klippart. The same report also contains a list of one hundred and eighty-five species of fishes “‘ supposed to occur INTRODUCTION. 7 in Indiana, and therefore in Ohio.’’ In regard to this, Klippart remarks, ‘‘ Messrs. Jordan and Gilbert’s Catalogue of the Fishes of Indiana is here given, under the belief that the same species of fishes found in Indiana south of the watershed may be found in the waters of Ohio.’’ The list contains many species not recorded for Ohio after the lapse of a quarter of a century, and some that, owing to peculiarities of distribution, probably never will be taken. ‘The second report contains descriptions of twenty-four species “‘ arranged from manuscript of Prof. D. S. Jordan, by his assistant, Mr. Ernest Copeland,’’ with plates of sixteen species. As a whole the reports contain much that is good. By far the most important paper on Ohio fishes is that by Prof. David Starr Jordan, published in the fourth volume of the Report on the Geology of Ohio, entitled a ‘‘ Report on the Fishes of Ohio,’’ and bearing date of December 10, 1878. Dr. Jordan was at that time connected with Butler University, in Indiana, and his services in the preparation of the report were engaged by Prof. J. S. Newberry, the State Geologist of Ohio. This report contains, besides the synonymy and many valuable notes in regard to habits, careful descriptions of a hundred and sixty-five species of fishes supposed to occur in Ohio. Of this number, nine have since proved to be redundant, while three others have been reduced to varietalrank. Of the remaining number described, more than fifty had not at that time been taken within the limits of the state, but were included because their range was such as made their occurrence within the state probable. Many of these have since been noted, but at the time of publication of Jordan’s Report only about one hundred species had been recorded for the state. Following Jordan’s Report, in more recent years have appeared a number of papers dealing with investigations more local in their nature, but all contributing materially to our knowl- edge of the occurrence and distribution of Ohio species. The first of these of which I have any knowledge, appeared in the Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, for July- October, 1888, under the title, ‘‘ Contributions to the Ichthyology o Ohio. No. 1,” by. Dr. J. A. Henshall, and gave a list, with occurrence notes, of seventy species noted in Hamilton County. 8 THE FISHES OF OHIO. This was followed in January, 1889, by a second paper, more general in its nature, adding forty species noted at various points in the state, and making a state list of a hundred and ten species noted by himself. Localities were given for all the species mentioned. _In 1892 appeared ‘‘ A Descriptive List of the fishes of Lorain County, Ohio,’’ as ‘‘ Laboratory Bulletin No. 2,’’ of Oberlin College, by Mr. L. M. McCormick. This list includes eighty- eight species “‘ resting upon specimens preserved in the museum,’’ with brief descriptions, and notes on occurrence and habits, and with plates of eighteen species. In 1893, Dr. Philip H. Kirsch, at that time Fish Commis- sioner of Indiana, investigated the Maumee River and its tribu- taries, under the direction of the U. S. Commission of Fish and Fisheries. Kirsch’s paper, ‘‘ Report upon Investigations in the Maumee River Basin During the Summer of 1893’’ (Bull. U.S. Fish Com., 1894), includes a list of eighty-seven species of fishes, with descriptions of the streams and lakes of the system, and many interesting notes. The report includes the unpublished notes of a small collection of fishes made in Defiance County by Prof. S. E. Meek, in 1887. Although the investigations covered portions of the Maumee Basin in Indiana and Michigan as well as in Ohio, the occurrences for each locality are definitely noted, and eighty-two of the eighty-seven species mentioned by Kirsch are recorded for localities in Ohio. In the summer of 1897, Mr. E. B. Williamson and the writer investigated the streams of Franklin County, and published the results in a paper entitled ‘‘A List of the Fishes of Franklin County, Ohio, with a description of a new species of Etheostoma, by R. C. Osburn and FE. B. Williamson’’ (Sixth Annual Proceed- ings of the Ohio State Academy of Science, 1898). ‘The list includes sixty-nine species, with occurrence notes, and some color notes on the rarer species, together with see breeding dates, and a table showing distribution. A somewhat similar investigation was carried on in the sum- mer of 1898, by Messrs. J. B. Parker, E. B. Williamson and the writer, and the results appeared in the Seventh Annual Proceed- ings of the Ohio State Academy of Science, 1899, under the title, INTRODUCTION. on ‘‘A Descriptive List of the Fishes of Big Jelloway Creek, Knox County, Ohio.’’ Many color descriptions of species in high. breeding coloration are given, and some interesting breeding and occurrence notes. Prof. E. B. Williamson has kindly furnished the author with. an unpublished list of twenty-six species taken by him in the. vicinity of Salem, Columbiana County. During the summers of 1899 and 1goo, aided by a portion of © the Emerson McMillin fund of the Ohio Academy of Science, the - writer was enabled to investigate some parts of the state not before studied, and, as the general distribution of the food fishes was already quite well known, attention was turned more directly to the smaller and less conspicuous species. As a result of the investigation, several species not previously noted have been added tothe list for the state, and a number of rare species. recorded for new localities and their range extended, while the- knowledge of the distribution of many of the more common species in the state has been considerably furthered. Ten days. spent in the vicinity of Ironton, seining in the Ohio River and Ice Creek, a small tributary of the Ohio, and in Johns Creek, a. tributary of Symmes Creek, gave some interesting results. The Ohio River, with its tributaries, Wheeling Creek and McMahon Creek, was also seined in the vicinity of Bellaire. The shallow waters of Sandusky Bay were hauled in many places and /Votvopis heterodon was added to the state list. "The Huron River, with. one of its small tributaries, was seined in the vicinity of Milan, and fifty species, nearly all common, were taken. Ashtabula Creek, in Ashtabula County, was seined, but yielded only a meager list, due to the fact that the stream flows for nearly its. whole course over a solid shale bo‘tom. The small streams form- ing the headwaters of the Wabash River, in Mercer County, yielded a good representative list, forty-nine species being taken. Stillwater and Wolf Creeks, tributaries of the Miami, near Day- ton, were hauled, and Exoglossum maxillingua taken—a most | unexpected find. The Cuyahoga River and its tributary, Break- neck Creek, were seined near Kent, and the Cuyahoga again at_ Hawkins; Grand River, with its small tributaries, was hauled for some distance above Painesville, and the Chagrin River was . Zh© THE FISHES OF OHIO. “touched at Willoughby ; Chippewa Lake, near Medina ; Summit Lake, at Akron, and Pippin Lake, near Kent, were investigated, and some time was also spent at Buckeye Lake, better known as ‘the Licking Reservoir; and the North Fork of Licking River, with some of its small tributary streams, was seined near Newark. The results of these investigations will be found embodied in the occurrence notes of the following list. No attempt was made to collect the parasites of fishes, but in a few cases these were common enough to attract the attention of even the casual observer. In Ashtabula Creek a species of leech was found attacking the catfish. The largest of the leeches were about one and one-half inches in length. They were found usually attached to the lower jaw among the barbels, which in color they closely resembled. Not a catfish was taken in this stream but what bore the evidence of the work of this parasite, aud frequently a half dozen leeches would be found on a single small catfish. In the headwaters of the Wabash River, in Mer- cer County, a species of crustaceous parasite was found in great numbers attacking especially the suckers and minnows. So numerous were they that it was difficult to find individuals of Catostomus commersonit and Campostoma anomalum, the species most affected, without at least one of these parasites. The points of attack were chiefly the regions immediately behind the pectoral and ventral fins, probably because they were most protected in such position. A Myxosporid parasite attacking /Votropis cornutus was noted for a number of localities in central and northern Ohio. This species has been partially described by Linton ( Psorosperm of Notropis megalops | cornutus|, Linton, Bull. U.S. Fish Com. for 1889 (1891), IX, pp. 459-61, pl. 120, figs. 1-3), from speci- mens taken by Mr. L. M. McCormick, in Black River, Lorain County, September 1, 1890, and again on October 5, 1891; and Gurley mentions it with additional notes (‘‘ The Myxosporidia or Psorosperms of Fishes,’’?’ by R. R. Gurley, Report of the Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries for 1892 (1894), 12. Genus: et sp. incert., pp. 182-3, pl. 7, figs. 1-3). This Psorosperm has been noted by the writer on JV. cornutus from Franklin County, and from Licking Reservoir in the Ohio River drainage, and from Huron River, Cuyahoga River, Grand River, and Chagrin River, INTRODUCTION. II tributary to Lake Erie. The species is evidently not, as believed by McCormick, ‘‘ restricted to a very narrow geographical range.”’ The cysts formed by this parasite reproducing in the subcutan- eous tissue may reach a diameter of one-third inch, and as many as eleven cysts have been noted on a single fish. It would seem ‘that in some cases they must inevitably cause the death of the host. Specimens of all the species of fishes recorded by Kellicott, Williamson, Parker and the writer are deposited in the museum of the Ohio State University. In the preparation of this paper free use has been made of tthe works of the various writers on Ohio fishes, of ‘‘’ The Fishes of North and Middle America’’ (Bulletin 47,.U. S. National Museum), by Drs. David Starr Jordan and Barton W. Evermann ; of Dr. O. P. Hay’s ‘‘ Lampreys and Fishes of Indiana’’ (19th Annual Geol. Rept. of Ind.), and of the reports and bulletins of ithe U. S. Commission of Fish and Fisheries. The classification is that adopted by Jordan and Evermann in Bulletin 47, U.S. Natl. Mus. The keys for the separation of families, genera and ‘species have, for the most part, been taken from the same work, but modified and abridged to meet the requirements of the more limited scope of this paper. The descriptions have been drawn largely from the same source, but as far as possible these have been verified for Ohio specimens, and modified as occasion demanded to make them apply more closely to the species as found in Ohio. While it is not the purpose to discuss in this paper the gen- ‘eral anatomy of the fish, such as may be found in any good laboratory guide on zoology, a few hints to the beginner in regard to methods of procedure and to some particular points of structure may here finda place. The teeth in some species are borne on nearly all parts of the mouth and pharynx—premaxil- laries, maxillaries, mandibles, vomer, palatines, tongue, hyoid ‘apparatus, pterygoids and pharyngeals, but may be wanting from ‘any or allof them. ‘The examination of all but the last men- tioned can usually be satisfactorily made through the open mouth ‘by using a blunt dissecting needle or the head of a pin as a “‘*feeler.’’ It is the determination of the number and arrange- 12 THE FISHES OF OHIO. ment of the lower pharyngeal teeth that constitutes the particular ‘‘béte noire’’ of the uninitiated, but this must be mastered or many identifications will be impossible. The lower pharyngeal bones form the fifth pair of gill arches and usually bear teeth on their inner surfaces, and to examine these it is necessary to remove the bones. ‘This is most easily done in the case of the minnows and other small species by lifting the opercle and insert- ing a small hook behind the gills. In the sunfish and suckers. and other larger forms it is best to run a scalpel around them before attempting to remove them. ‘The teeth when removed are usually covered, more or less, with broken tissues, which can be removed by cleaning carefully with a fine-pointed needle, or with a soft brush under water. Incase the teeth have been broken off, as frequently happens, the bases can be distinguished. A good hand lens is essential. In native minnows the pharyngeal teeth are in one or two rows, and their number and arrangement is expressed by a formula—thus 1,4-4, 2, meaning that on one side the small, inner row consists of one tooth, and on the oppo- site of two, while the teeth of the outer row are the same on both sides. The fins are composed of stout spines, or soft rays or sf both. In the fin formula the number of spines is expressed by Roman characters, and the rays by the Arabic figures. Thus the formula, ‘‘D. X, 14,’’ indicates that the dorsal fin is composed of ten spines and fourteen rays. If the dorsal fin were in two parts the formula would read ‘‘D. X-14.’’ In counting the number of rays the undeveloped rudimentary ones are not usually consid- ered except in the case of the catfish. A little allowance may be made for variation in number of rays. In small specimens where the rays are not always easy to count, a good way to determine the number is to draw the point of a pin forward over the fin near the base of the rays. A good lens is also useful. The dorsal fin is usually referred to in descriptions as simply the dorsal, and other fins in like manner. They are further abbrevi- ated by using D., A., C., V. and P. to stand for dorsal, anal, caudal, ventral and pectoral fins respectively. The scal:s are counted along the lateral line (a longitudinal row of scales each with a small pore in most fishes) from behind the opercle to the base of the caudal fin, and the transverse rows are counted from the front. INTRODUCTION. 13 of the dorsal fin to the lateral line and from the lateral line to the middle of the belly. Thus the formula, ‘‘ 6—-45-4,’’ means that there are forty-five scales in a longitudinal row, and that there are six rows above the lateral line and four below it. If the lateral line were absent the formula would read, ‘‘45-10.’’ Variations, sometimes considerable, may be looked for in the scale formula. The gill membranes (free folds of skin below the opercles, sup- ported by one or more branchiostegal rays) may be ‘‘ connected,’’ that is, united together in a fold below the ‘‘isthmus’’ or space between the throat and breast, they may be ‘‘joined to the isthmus’’ along their lower edges, or they may be ‘‘ free’’ from the isthmus and from each other. The pre-maxillaries are ‘‘ pro- tractile’’ when they are separated in front from the skin of the forehead by a transverse groove, and ‘‘not protractile’’ when such transverse groove is incomplete or wanting. In some fishes, as in the bass and many sunfishes there is a ‘‘ supplemental max- illary’’ bone lying along the upper side of the maxillary. In taking body measurements the depth is taken at the deepest place, and the head is measured from point of snout to the end of the opercle, except that in sunfishes the soft flap is not measured. Depth and length of head are compared with the length of the whole body exclusive of the caudal fin. Thus, ‘‘ head 4’’ means that the length of the head is contained four times in the length of the body. - The eye is measured to the full width of the orbit. ‘The writer desires to express his gratitude to the Depart- ment of Zoology of the Ohio State University for the use of a seine and other collecting apparatus, to Prof. Herbert Osborn for kindly advice and assistance in many ways, and to the Trustees of the Ohio State Academy of Science for pecuniary aid, through the Emerson McMillin fund, in carrying on the work of seining. Special acknowledgment is also due to Messrs. J. S. Hine, W. R. ihoades, Chas: Carter, F. L. Landacre, J]. H. Pumphrey, S. E. Rasor, Chas. Osburn, and others, who by kindly assistance in various ways have so materially aided in the pursuit of the work. tie FISHES. OF OHTO.. A. Body long and slender, eel-like ; skin smooth and slippery, wholly devoid of scales ;- no paired fins; no lower jaw; the mouth placed in or near the center of a large, circular and sucker-like disc ; a single median nostril; skeleton Cartilaginous.— Class: MARSIPOBRANCHII (Cyclostomes). AA. Body variously developed, scales usually but not always present; paired fins pres-— ent ; lower jaw always present; nostrils never median.— Class: Pisces (True Fishes). Ofrss; . MARSIPOBRANCHITI. Order: HYPEROARTII. Family : PETROMYZONIDAE (Lampreys). Key to Genera. A. Sucker large, and furnished with numerous teeth which are in rows radiating from. the mouth ; horny plate above the mouth short and provided with 2 or 3 teeth, which are placed close together.— ICHTHYOMYZON. AA. Sucker relatively small, and with few teeth; mouth overhung with a crescent— shaped, horny plate, which terminates at each end ina distinct tooth; tongue armed in front with a crescentic, serrated, horny plate.— LAMPETRA. Genus: ICHTHYOMYZON. Ichthyomyzon concolor (Kirtland). SILVER LAMPREY. Sucking disk large, moderately fringed ; teeth strong and nearly uni-- form; two teeth on supraoral plate; seven in the transverse row below mouth, the remaining teeth arranged in about four concentric circles. Dorsal fin arising midway from snout to end of tail, broadly notched, continuous. with caudal; anal fin also continuous with caudal. About fifty-two muscu- lar grooves between gills and vent. General color bluish, sometimes. blotched with black ; a dark blue spot above each gill opening. Length about 12 inches. This species appears to be distributed throughout the state, though nowhere very common. It ascends small brooks in spring- to breed. McCormick mentions finding females with ripe eggs on May 22, in Vermillion river. The breeding date must be- considerably earlier in central Ohio, as Messrs. Parker, William- son and the writer took young larvze a couple of inches long in Big Jelloway creek, Knox County, during the latter part of May, 1898. On the same date a large larva seven inches long was. taken, so the species must continue in the larval stage something _*It has been thought best to include here also the Lampreys (Marsipobranchi1) of Ohio, for the reason that, in the popular idea, a lamprey is a “‘ fish.” “16 THE FISHES OF OHIO. ~more than a year. One large larva, seven inches in length, -showed the following colors: dull yellow, pigmented above with fine, brown specks, giving to the back a brownish cast ; this is interrupted in the mid-dorsal line, leaving a yellow, vertebral ‘line ; fins yellowish, brightest at base. Young larve, two and one-half inches long, were light olive brown, with fine brown specks above ; dark around base of anal fin. Eyes very slightly developed. The young larvze were taken froma mass of sand -and mud seined from the bottom of Sawmill Run. The species was first taken by Dr. Kirtland in Big Miami river, and described by him. He afterward recorded it from the Mahoning and Scioto rivers. Vermillion river, McCormick, 1892 ; Big Jelloway creek, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898 ; Hen- -shall mentions one which passed through a hydrant in Cincinnati ; -and Dr. Jordan says, ‘‘I have obtained several specimens with Perch from Lake Erie, both external, feeding on the Perch, and -internal, having been devoured by the fish.”’ Genus: WLAMPETRA.. Lampetra wilderi (Gage). SMALL BLACK LAMPREY; BROOK LAMPREY. Sucking disk smaller than in the preceding, the fringes longer. Dorsal “fin arising midway from snout to end of tail, not continuous with caudal ~except during breeding season, when it is deeply notched. Below the mouth is a transverse row of blunt, horny teeth, 5 to gin number. On each side of the disk is a plate with three bicuspid teeth; supraoral plate with a tooth at either end; remaining teeth few and weak. About 65 muscular grooves between gills and vent. Color bluish black, lighter on disk and “belly. Length’6 to g inches. : Although from its range we might expect this species to occur throughout the state, it has, I believe, been recorded for but one ‘locality. Mr. J. B. Parker has observed it to be common on the ‘ripples of small tributaries of Big Jelloway creek, in Knox ‘County, about the middle of April. Four specimens were cap- tured at one dip of an insect net, and specimens taken by him are tin the State University collection. The Ammocwtes bicolor, or Blind Lamprey, ‘which Kirtland records from the Mahoning river smay have been'the larva of either this or the preceding species, cas the immature forms are so similar as to be almost indistin- guishable. — it ay , ; KEY TO FAMILIES. I7 Class: PISCES: Sub-Class: ‘TELEOSToMI (True Fishes). | Artificial Key to the Families of Fishes. I, VENTRAL FINS PRESENT—ABDOMINAL. A. Back with an adipose fin behind the single, rayed darsal fin. B. Head with barbels about mouth and nostrils, body scaleless; a single spine in each pectoral and in dorsal fin.— SILURID2. BB. Head without barbels ; body scaled. c. Dorsal, anal and ventral fins each with a small but distinct spine; scales ctenoid.— PERCOPSID®. CC. Dorsal, anal, and ventrals without distinct spine; scales not ctenoid.— SALMONIDZ. AA. Back without adipose fin. DE Dorsal fin single, composed of rays, and not preceded by a series of free spines. EB. Tail evidently strongly heterocercal. F. Body naked; snout with a spatulate blade; mouth wide, without barbels.— POLYODONTID&. FF. Body with scales or bony plates or shields. G. Body with 5 series of bony shields; mouth inferior, tooth- less, preceded by four barbels.— ACIPENSERID2. GG. Body scaly. jek Seales cycloid; a broad, bony, gular plate; dorsal fin many rayed.— AMIID2. HH. Scales ganoid ; no gular plate ; dorsal fin short.— LEPISOSTEID2. EE. Tail not evidently heterocercal. Ie Gill membranes broadly joined to the isthmus; head naked; no teeth in jaws. Me Lower pharyngeal teeth very numerous, in one row like the teeth of a comb.— CATOSTOMID. JJ. Lower pharyngéal teeth few, fewer than 8, in 1 to3 rows.— CYPRINID. II. Gill membranes free, not attached to the isthmus. K. Head scaly, more or less. L. Upper jaw not protractile, its lateral margins formed by the maxillaries. M. Jaws depressed, prolonged ; lateral line present.— LUCID. MM. Jaws short; no lateral line.— UMBRID. LL. Upper jaw protractile, its margin formed by premaxil- _laries alone; no lateral line.— POECILIIDZ. KK. Head naked. N. Lateral line well developed; mouth large, teeth all pointed, some of them canine.— HIODONTID2&. NN. Lateral line wanting. O. Mouth small, inferior, toothless; stomach gizzard- like.— DOROSOMATID2:. OO. Mouth moderate, terminal; stomach not gizzard- like.— CLUPEIDA:. | 18 THE FISHES OF OHIO. DD. Dorsal fin not asin D. P. Dorsal fin single, preceded by free spines ; body scaleless.— GASTEROSTEID®. PP. Dorsal fins, two ; the first small, composed entirely of spines; body very slender, covered with scales.— ATHERINID®. II. VENTRAL FINS PRESENT—THORACIC OR SUB-JUGULAR. A. Body covered with scales. B. Rays of the ventral fins, I, 5. c Lateral line extending on caudal fin to tip of middle rays.—SCIAENID2.. cc. Lateral line not extending beyond base of caudal fin. D. Pseudobranchie or false gills on under side of opercles well devel- oped; head scaled forward to between nostrils.—SERRANID®. DD. Pseudobranchiz wanting or covered by skin. E. Anal spines, 3 to 10; body more or less deep and compressed.— CENTRARCHID. EE. Anal spines, 1 or 2; body usually elongate.— PERCID. BB. Rays of the ventral fins not I, 5. F. Dorsal fin single, with 3 or 4 spines.— APHREDODERID. © FF. Dorsal tin divided into 2 distinct parts, spines wanting.— GADID®. AA. Body naked ; dorsal fin with 6 or 7 spines.— COTTID. III. VENTRAL FINS ENTIRELY WANTING. A. Body long and snake-like; skin cov red with lonz imbedded scales at right angles. to each other ; lower jaw projecting. — ANGUILLID®. Serzes: GANOIDEI. CHONDROGANOIDEA (THE CARTILAGINOUS GANOIDS). Order : BEEACHOSTOMI. Family: POLYODONTIDA. Genus: POLYODON. Polyodon spathula (Walbaum). PADDLE-FISH ; SPOON-BILL CAT. A very peculiar looking fish, recognizable at once by its long, paddle- shaped snout, which is about % the length of the body and is thin and flexi- ble. The eyes are small and placed near the base of the snout ; opercular flap long, reaching back as far as to the ventral fins. Caudal fin large, forked, the lobes about equal. Color olivaceous, paler below. This singular fish attains a length of 5 or 6 feet, but is of little or no economic importance. c¢ Taken in the Ohio and Muskingum rivers, Kirtland; ‘‘ one was taken in a pound net (in Lake Erie) near Vermillion in 1874,’ McCormick; ‘‘common in the Ohio river,’’ Henshall; 1888. ACIPENSERIDA. IQ, Order: CHONDROSTEI. family: ACIPENSERIDA. Key to Genera. A. Spiracles present ; snout subconic; rows of bony shields distinct throughout ; the tail not depressed nor mailed.— ACIPENSER. AA. Spiracles obsolete ; snout subspatulate ; rows of bony shields confluent behind dor- sal so that the depressed tail is completely mailed.— SCAPHIRHYNCHUS. Genus: MACIPENSER. Acipenser rubicundus Le Sueur. LAKE STURGEON; OHIO STURGEON ; ROCK STURGEON. Body elongate, terete, tapering towards snout and tail. Snout long and slender in young, becoming more blunt with age. Body covered with large, rough, strongly hooked shields, which become smoother with age. Color dark olive above, sides paler or reddish, with sometimes irregular dark spots. Length 6 feet. © This species occurs both in Lake Erie and the Ohio river. Those from the Ohio, formerly considered as belonging to a separate species, 4. maculosus, are now regarded as the young of A. rubicundus. ‘‘’The Ohio river as far as Pittsburg,’’ Rafin- esque (Rafinesque made six species out of this and Scaphirhyn- chus platorynchus, which he included in the same genus); Lake Erie and Ohio river, Kirtland ; Lorain County, very common, McCormick, 1892; abundant in the Ohio river, Henshall, 1888 ; Lake Erie (west end), Kirsch, 1893. Genus: SCAPHIRHYNCHUS. Scaphirhynchus platorynchus (Rafinesque). SHOVELNOSE STURGEON. Body slender, head broad, becoming suddenly broader just behind the eyes. Snout flat and pointed. The body tapers gradually backward from the head to the tail, the upper lobe of which ends ina long, slender filament. Body protected by five rows of bony shields, which are keeled and hooked. Color olive, paler below. Length 5 feet. ‘“Very common in the Ohio, but seldom reaching as high as Pittsburg,’’ Rafinesque ; ‘‘common in the waters of the Ohio,’’ Kirtland ; ‘‘ common in the Ohio,’’ Henshall, 1888. 20 THE FISHES: OF SOETO: HOLOSTEI (THE Bony GANoIDs). Order: RHOMBOGANOIDEA. Family ; VEPISOSTEIDA. Genus: LEPISOSTEUS. Key to Species. A. Large teeth of upper jaw in I row on each side. B. Beak long and slender, snout more than twice the length of head.— __ osseus. BB. Beak shorter and broader, little longer than the rest of the head.—p/atostomus. AA. Large teeth of upper jaw in 2 rows on each side; beak short and broad, not longer than rest of head.— tristechus. Lepisosteus osseus (Linnaeus). COMMON GAR PIKE; BILLFISH ; GAR. Snout at least twice as long as the rest of the head, and quite slender, its least width being contained I5 or 20 times inits length. Color olivaceous above, paler below. Young with round, black spots on vertical fins and posterior part of body, these becoming less distinct with age. Very young with black, lateral band. Length 5 feet. A voracious, good-for-nothing fish, but interesting to the naturalist on account of its structure and habits. A common and widely distributed species, being found in Lake Erie and Ohio river, and in all the larger streams of the state. They are very common in the Scioto river below Columbus, where the river in summer is rotten with filth from the sewers of the city. They thave a peculiar habit of lying motionless in schools at the top of the water. Dr. Kirtland records the species for the state as ““found in most of the larger tributaries of the Ohio;’’ Lorain County, Lak2 and lower part of larger streams,’’ McCormick, a892; Ohioriver and Lake Erie, Henshall, 1889 ; Maumee river, Blanchard river, Auglaize river, Hoaglin creek and Beaver creek, Kirsch, 1893; Scioto river at Columbus, Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Ohio river at Ironton, John’s Creek at Waterloo, Huron river at Milan, and Sandusky Bay, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Ohio River at Bellaire, R. C. Osburn, 1900. Lepisosteus platostomus Rafinesque. SHORT-NOSED GAR. Distinguished from ZL. osseus chiefly by the snout, which is only a little longer than the rest of the head—never more than 134 times the léngth of LEPISOSTEIDAY—AMIIDA. 2f the head. The snout is also comparatively broader than in Z. osseus, its least width being contained only 5 or 6 times in its length. Coloration much as in LZ. osseus. Rare in Lake Erie and its tributaries, more common in the Ohio and its tributary rivers. Ohio, Miami and Scioto rivers, Rafinesque; Maumee river at Toledo, ‘‘a single specimen,’’ Kirsch, 1893; Lorain county, ‘‘very rare,’?’ McCormick, 1892 ; Sandusky Bay, one specimen, and Ohio river at Ironton, R. C. Osburn, 1899. Lepisosteus tristcechus (Bloch and Schneider). ALLIGATOR GAR. Snout shorter than in either of the preceding members of this genus, being usually shorter than the head. It is also comparatively much broader, its least width being contained in its length 3% times. Length 8 or Io feet. ‘‘ 4 huge, muscular, voracious fish, useless as food, remarkable for its arma- ture of enameled scales.’’ This species is included on the authority of Dr. Kirtland, who says (Rept. on the Zool. of Ohio, 1838): .‘‘A specimen is to be seen in the Cincinnati Museum, said to have been taken within the bounds of our state.’’ Jordan and Evermann (Bull. 47, U. S. Natl. Mus.) give its range as far as Cincinnati, whether - on added evidence I do not know. Orch -CY CLOGANOIDEA. Family: AMIIDA. Genus: AMIA. Amia calva Linnaeus. DOGFISH; BOWFIN ; GRINDLE. Head 3% in length ; depth 4 to 4%; D. 48; A. Ioto 12; V. 7; scalesim lateral line 67 ; lateral line nearly median, directed slightly upward at either end. Color dark olive or blackish, paler below; lower jaw usually with round, dark spots ; fins somewhat mottled. Male with a round, black spot at base of caudal above, surrounded by a yellowish or orange shade. Length, male 18 inches ; female 2 feet. Lake Erie, Kirtland; Lake Erie and Ohio river, Jordan ; Lorain County, ‘‘ Rare, once in a great while one is brought in from the pounds, and I have taken one in Black river,’’ McCor- mick, 1892; Lake Erie, Henshall; one specimen from the Maumee river at Toledo, Kirsch, 1893; Huron river and San- dusky Bay, R. C. Osburn, 1899. 22 THE FISHES OF OHIO. Series: “TERBOS TET Order: NEMATOGNATHI. Family: SiLuRipa} (The Catfishes). Key to Genera. A. Adipose fin, with its posterior margin free. B. Premaxillary band of teeth truncate behind; not produced backward at the outer angles. C. Supraoccipital bone continued backward from the nape, its notched tip receiving the bone at base of dorsal spine, so that a continuous bony bridge is formed under the skin ; caudal fin forked.— IcTALURUS. CC. Supraoccipital not reaching as far as dorsal fin, the bony bridge more or less incom plete.— AMEIURUS. BB. Premaxillary band of teeth with a lateral backward extension on each side; lower jaw projecting.— LEPTOPS. AA. Adipose fin keel-like, adnate to the back. Be Band of teeth in upper jaw, with a backward extension at its outer posterior angle as in Lepfops.— NOTURUS. . BB. Band of teeth in upper jaw without backward extension, as in Amefurus.— ‘“SCHILBEODES. Genus: ICTALURUS. Key to Species. PX Anal fin very long, its rays 32 to 35.— Jurcatus, AA. Anal fin shorter, its rays about 26.— punctatus. Ictalurus furcatus (Le Sueur). CHUCKLE-HEADED Cart. Head 4% ; depth 4 in adults to 5% in young. Anal fin long, of 32 to 35 rays. Eye small, wholly anterior, the middle of the head being behindsits posterior margin. Humeral spine not reaching middle of pectoral spine. Color silvery, sometimes spotted with darker. Sometimes reaching a weight of over 40 pounds. ‘“T have seen one or two specimens taken at Cincinnati,’ Jordan ; ‘‘common in the Ohio river,’’ Henshall, 1888. Not recorded elsewhere in the State. Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque). CHANNEL CAT; BLUE CAT; WHITE CAT; LADY CAT. Head 4; depth 5; anal fin of 25 to 30 rays, usually 27 in Ohio speci- ‘mens. Eye large, the middle point of the length of the head being near its posterior margin. Barbels long, those of the maxillary reaching beyond gill opening. Humeral process long, more than % the length of pectoral spine. Color light olivaceous, becoming silvery or pale on sides and belly ; the sides usually with distinct round, dark spots, these becoming less dis- tinct with age. Young specimens usually have a gaunt, faded-out, ‘‘con- sumptive’’ look. It reaches a weight of about 25 pounds. SILURID&. 23 Distributed throughout the state, but more abundant in the Ohio and tributaries. Rafinesque records it under the name Pimelodus (Silurus) maculatus, ‘‘ as far as Pittsburg.’’ Kirtland mentions it under the name Pimelobus coerulescens, as ‘‘ common to the Ohio and lake waters,’’ and as P. pallidus, ‘‘ common. in the Ohio at Cincinnati.’’ The latter is identical with the former. Abundant in Ohio and Little Miami rivers, Henshall, 1888 ; Lorain County, common, McCormick, 1892; Maumee river at Toledo and Grand Rapids, Kirsch, 1893; Muskingum river at McConnellsville, Prof. D. S. Kellicott, 1895 ; Franklin County, ““common in all larger streams, especially in Big Walnut creek,’’ Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Ohio river and Ice creek at Ironton, Wabash river at Celina, R. C. Osburn, 1899 ; Chippewa lake, Ohio river at Bellaire, R. C. Osburn, 1g00. Genus: AMEIURUS. Key to Species. A. Caudal fin forked.— lacustris AA. Caudal fin not forked. B. Anal fin long, of 24 to 27 rays (counting rudiments).— nata’ts. BB. Anal fin shorter, of 17 to 22 rays. C. Lower jaw projecting. Anal rays 20.— vulgaris. CC. Lower jaw not projecting. D. Pectoral spines long, 2to 2% in head ; anal rays 20 to 23.—nebulosus. DD. Pectoral spines shorter, 2% to 3 in head; anal rays 17 to 19.—melas. Ameiurus lacustris (Walbaum). MISsISsIppI CAT; GREAT FORK-TAILED CAT. Head 4, low, broad and depressed, its upper surface quite flat, its width 2 its length. Depth 5; D. 1-5; A. 25 to 32, base of the fin as long as head. Humeral process short, only a little over % the length of pectoral spine. Body stouter than in the preceding genus. Caudal fin deeply forked. Color dark olivaceous or slate, growing darker with age; belly pale, no dark spots on sides. Our largest catfish, said to reach a weight of 150 pounds or more. In Ohio this species is well distributed, being found in the lake, Ohio river and larger streams. Kirtland does not record this species, probably confusing it with his P2melobus coerulescens (Ictalurus punctatus). Common in the Ohio river, Henshall, 1888 ; Lorain County, common in the lake and lower parts of the rivers, McCormick, 1892; Franklin County, two specimens taken in Big Darby creek; one of these, a female weighing 4% pounds, contained eggs, June 21, 1897, Williamson and Osburn. 24 THE FISHES OFPVOHIO: Ameiurus natalis (Le Sueur). YELLow Cart. Head broad and short; upper jaw slightly projecting. Body stoutish ; the back low, not arched. Anal fin long, its base contained in length of body 3% to 3% times; its rays 24 to 27. Color usually brownish or yellow- ish, sometimes black ; belly pale or yellowish. Length about a foot. Ohio specimens seem to fall into the nominal variety cupreus, as indicated by the longer upper jaw. This is a common species in most parts of Ohio, occurring in nearly all streams and lakes. ‘‘ The yellow catfish I have only seen in the Cincinnati markets, where it is comparatively rare,’’ Kirtland ; Lake Erie, Henshall, 1889 ; Lorain County, .‘‘ common in the ponds, streams and lake,’’? McCormick, 1892; Maumee river at Antwerp, Defiance, Grand Rapids and Waterville, Tiffin river at Brunersburg, Sugar creek at Lima, Lost creek at Lima, Blanchard river at Findlay and Ottawa, Beaver creek at Grand Rapids, ‘‘ seemingly scarce at all of these points,’’ Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, Scioto river, Olentangy river,-Big Walnut, Little Walnut and Darby creeks, and Hell Branch, Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Ohio river at Ironton, John’s creek at Water- loo, Huron river at Milan, Ashtabula creek at Ashtabula, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks at Dayton, North Fork of Licking river at Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899 ; Chippewa lake, Summit lake, Licking reservoir, R. C. Osburn, 1goo. Ameiurus vulgaris (Thompson). LONG-JAWED CATFISH. Head 3% to 4, a little longer than broad, considerably narrowed forward when viewed from above, lower jaw distinctly projecting. Body somewhat elongate and compressed, the back somewhat elevated. Analrays 20. Color dark brownish or black, becoming white rather abruptly on the belly. Length 18 inches. The Long Jawed Catfish is not common in Ohio, but seems to be widely distributed. Jordan mentions it as ‘‘taken in Lake Erie and occasionally in the Ohio’’ ; Henshall in 1889 records it for ‘Lake Ene;. Lorain) County," Martin's. rim, yonlyeome recorded,’’ McCormick, 1892; two specimens from the Ohio canal at Columbus, Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Pippin lake, R: €:.Osburn, 1900: ee SILURIDA. 25 Ameiurus nebulosus (Le Sueur). COMMON BULL-HEAD ; HORNED Pout. Head broad and flattened, upper jaw noticeably the longer. Body rather elongate, depth 4 to 4%. Anal fin with 20 to 22 rays, its base contained 4 times in length of body. Humeral process more than % the length of the rather long pectoral spine. Color dark brown or brownish yellow, usually somewhat clouded, sometimes nearly black. Length 18 inches. A very common species in the lake and its tributaries, less common in the Ohio river drainage, but found in all larger streams. ‘‘ Occasionally seen in the Cincinnati markets,’’ Kirt- land ; Lake Erie, Henshall, 1889 ; Lorain County, ‘‘common in all streams,’’ McCormick, 1892; Maumee river at Cecil and featervine, Bish creek at Edgerton, St. Mary’s river at St. Mary’s, Gordon and Lost creeks near Cecil, Tiffin river at West Unity and Brunersburg, Auglaize river at Wapakoneta, Clover- dale, Oakwood and Defiance, Sugar creek at Cloverdale and Lima, Lost creek at Lima, Blanchard river at Findlay and Cloverdale, Hoaglin creek at Oakland, Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, Scioto river, Olentangy river, Mason’s run, Big Walnut, Little Walnut, Big Darby and Alum creeks, Williamson & Osburn, 1897 ; Huron river at Milan, Sandusky Bay, Ashtabula creek at Ashtabula, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Pippin lake, Summit lake, R. C. Osburn, I900. Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque). BLACK BULL-HEAD. Body stout, short and deep, back high, the profile nearly straight to base of dorsal fin. Head broad, rounded in front, jaws about equal. Pectoral spine short, its length contained 2% to 3 times in length of head. Anal fin short and deep, its base 4% to 5 in length of body, rays 17 to 19, the light colored rays contrasting sharply with the dark membranes. Color almost black, sometimes brownish or yellowish, the belly pale or yellowish. This species shares with the three next preceding the name of Bull-head, the ordinary fisherman not drawing very fine distinctions in regard to species. The Black Bull-head is the most abundant species of catfish in the state, found in nearly all streams and ponds of whatever size, and especially in the Ohio river drainage. It is less abundant in the lake drainage. Itis a mud loving speciesand is less likely to be found in clear, swift streams than in muddy, stagnant bayous. A, xanthocephalus Rafinesque is now recorded as synonymous £26 THE FISHES OR ZOMIO: ‘with A. melas. Recorded by Kirtland as A. xanthocephalus, and by Jordan as A. melas and szanthocephalus. ‘‘ Very common in ‘Ohio and Little Miami rivers and Mill creek,’’ Henshall, 1888 ; ‘Lorain County, ‘‘common in all streams and ponds,’’ McCor- mick, 1892; Maumee tiver at Cecil and St. Mary's tiveamar Rockford, Kirsch, 1893 ; Franklin County, in nearly all streams, Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Big Jelloway creek at Howard, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898; Ohio river at Ironton, Huron river at Milan, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks at Dayton, North Fork of Licking river at Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899 ; Sandusky, Prof. D. S. Kellicott, Williamson and Osburn, 1896; Niggermill run at Salem, E. B. Williamson, 1900 ; ‘Sandusky bay at ‘‘ Black Channel,’’ Breakneck creek and Cuyahoga river near Kent, and Licking reservoir, R. C. Osburn, 1900; June 22 is given as a breeding date by Williamson and Osburn. Genus: LEPTOPS. Leptops olivaris (Rafinesque). Mup Cart. Body slender, depressed forward, the head extremely flat, the lower jaw the longer. Dorsal spine very weak, only % the height of the fin ; caudal fin slightly emarginate ; anal short, its base about 4 the length of body, its rays12to15. Yellowish, much mottled with brown and greenish, whitish below. Size large, reaching a weight of 50 to 75 pounds. Jordan says, ‘‘ This species abounds in the Ohio river and its larger tributaries,’’ but it is probably common nowhere in Ohio except in the southwestern part of the state. Henshall records it for White Oak creek and the Ohio river, 1889; and in 1892 McCormick mentions the occurrence in Lake Erie, Lorain County, as ‘‘quite rare; I have seen but one specimen! fresh) though I have noticed heads on the beach.’’ Genus: NOTURUS. Noturus flavus Rafinesque. YELLOW STONE CAT. Head broad and flat, much depressed, 4 in length of body. Body terete, ‘tail compressed. Soft dorsal fin keel-like, separated from caudal by a deep notch. Dorsal spine very short, only % as long as pectoral spine ; caudal ‘rounded ; anal short, itsrays about 16. Brownish yellow, varying into bluish -or blackish. Length 1 foot. SILURID.. 27 Widely distributed and generally common in suitable locali- ties. It is found most abundantly on stony ripples of the larger streams, and on sandy and gravelly bottoms of rivers and lakes. ‘Occasionally found beneath stones in the Mahoning river,’’ Kirtland ; ‘‘ much more abundant in the Ohio and its immediate tributaries than in the streams of the interior,’ Jordan ; ‘‘ abun- dant in Little Miami river, Mill creek and nearly all streams’”’ (Hamilton County), Henshall, 1888; Lorain County, ‘‘ larger streams and the lake,’’ McCormick. 1892; Maumee river at Defiance, Grand Rapids and Waterville, Fish creek at Edgerton, St. Mary’s river at Rockford, Auglaize river at Cloverdale and Defiance, Blanchard river at Ottawa, Hoaglin creek at Oakland, and Blanchard river and Sugar creek at Cloverdale, Kirsch, 1893 ; Franklin County, ‘‘abundant in all larger streams, Scioto and Olentangy rivers, Big Walnut, Little Walnut, Alum, Big and Little Darby creeks, Black Lick and Hell Branch,’’ Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Knox County, Big Jelloway creek, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 18¢8; John’s creek at Waterloo, Huron diver at Milan, North Fork of Licking river at Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Lake Erie at Sandusky, frequently thrown up dead on the beach by the waves; not noticed in Sandusky bay, few@ecime creck ‘at Bridgeport, Ohio river at Bellaire, R. C. Osburn, 1900. Genus: SCHILBEODES. Key to Species. BS, Pectoral spine entire or grooved behind, never retrcrsely serrate; adipose fin high and continuous, not separated by a notch from the caudal.— ZyvvInus. AA. Pectoral spine distinctly serrate behind. B. Adipose fin nearly or quite free from caudal; color nearly plain brownish, saddle-like blotches faint, everywhere pigmented with fine dots; anterior edge of pectoral spine retrorsely serrate.— eleutherus. BB. Adipose fin not quite free from caudal; color much variegated, back with dis- tinct saddle-like blotches ; pectoral spine strong, its anterior edge with few serrations.— MiUrUus. Schilbeodes gyrinus (Mitchill). CHUBBY STONE CaT; TADPOLE CAT. Head large, broad and depressed, 314 to 4 in length; mouth wide, jaws ( about equal. Body short and stout, pot-bellied, shaped much like a tadpole. Caudal peduncle comparatively long and compressed. Pectoral spine not serrated behind, but grooved instead. Anal fin with 13 rays. Soft dorsal 28 THE FISHES OF OBTO: continuous with caudal, scarcely notched. Color yellowish brown or brown- ish olive, nearly uniform ; a distinct narrow, black line along lateral line. Length 5 inches. Rather irregularly distributed, but common in suitable locali- ties. Dr. Jordan (Ohio Rept.) says of this species and .S. mezurus that ‘‘ their habits are similar, they are usually found together and are about equally abundant in Ohio,’’ but in the writer’s. experience .S. #ezurvus has been found much more generally dis- tributed, occurring in the open water of streams, usually on gravelly or stony bottom, while gy7vzmzus seems to prefer the quiet of lakes and ponds, and in the course of several years col- lecting the two species have never been taken together. 5S. gyrinus was observed by Prof. D.-S. Kellicott, Mr. E. B. Will-. iamson and the writer to be common among the decaying vegeta- tion in shallow water in Sandusky Bay in 1896; ‘‘ Ross lake,’’ Henshall, 1889; Lorain County, ‘‘ Common on mud banks in the lower parts of streams entering the lake,’’ McCormick, 1892; Maumee river at Toledo, St. Mary’s river at St. Mary’s, ‘“‘every— where scarce,’’ Kirsch, 1893 ; Franklin County, Mason’s run and Big Darby creek, rare, Williamson and Osburn, 1897 ; Sandusky Bay, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Summit lake, Licking reservoir, R. C.. Osburn, 1900. Schilbeodes eleutherus (Jordan). Head broad and flat, much depressed, narrowed anteriorly, 33/ in body ; upper jaw much longer than the lower, which is included. Body much of the same form as that of S. mzurus, but with the back somewhat higher ; depth 4% in length. Soft dorsal free from caudal, or only very slightly con- nected. Color nearly uniform brown above, lighter below, flecked every-. where except on middle of belly, with black dots. Distinguished from S. miurus, which it most nearly resembles, by the free adipose fin, the longer upper jaw and the absence of distinct, black, saddle-like blotches on the back. Length 4 inches. I know of but one specimen of this very rare species taken within the limits of the state. This was taken in Big Walnut. creek, Franklin County, by Mr. E. B. Williamson and the writer,, Junees rao07% SILURIDA. 29 Schilbeodes miurus (Jordan). CROSS-BARRED STONE Cart. Head very much depressed, rounded anteriorly, 334 in length; upper jaw longer but not so much so as in the preceding species. Depth about 5 in length; back scarcely elevated ; adipose fin connected with caudal, but more or less deeply notched. Conspicuously mottled with gray and blackish, with 3 or 4 definite black blotches across the back. Length, 4 inches. A rather common and widely distributed species. Ohio river at Raccoon I., Henshall, 1889; Lorain County, quite rare, Ver- million and Black rivers, McCormick, 1892; Maumee river at Antwerp, St. Joseph river at Edgerton, St. Mary’s river at Rock- ford, Tiffin river at West Unity and Brunersburg, and Auglaize river at Cloverdale, Oakwood and Defiance, ‘‘In an old mill race which empties into Tiffin river near West Unity large numbers were caught, common in Hoaglin creek near Oakwood, rather scarce at all other points,’’ Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, gen- erally common, abundant in Big Walnut, taken also in Scioto river, Olentangy river, Black Lick, Little Walnut, Big Darby and Alum creeks, Williamson and Osburn, 1897 ; Ohio river at Ironton, John’s creek at Waterloo, Sandusky Bay, Ashtabula creek at Ashtabula, Wabash river at Celina, North Fork of Lick- ing river at Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899 ; Ohio river at Bellaire, R. C. Osburn, 1900. Females were observed with ripe eggs from June 25 to July 6, 1897, by Mr. Williamson and the writer. 30 THE FISHES OF (OHIO: Order: PLECTOSPONDYLI. Sub-Order: EVENTOGNATHI. Family: Catostomipa (The Suckers). Key to Genera. A. Dorsal fin elongate, developed rays 25 to 50, air bladder in 2 parts. B. Fontanelle present, body ovate, scales large. c. Mouth large, more or less terminal, protractile forward; pharyngeal bones and teeth moderate, large species of dark color.— ICTIOBUS. cc. Mouth smaller, inferior, protractile downward; pharyngeal bones nar- row, the teeth thin and weak ; smaller species, pale in color.— CARPIODES. BB. Fontanelle obliterated by union of parietal bones; body elongate; scales. rather small; lips thick and papillose.— CYCLEPTUS. AA. Dorsal fin short, to to 18 developed rays. D. Air bladder in 2 parts. 15), Lateral line present, complete and continuous; scales small, more than 50 in lateral line.— CATOSTOMUS. EE. Lateral line interrupted or wanting, scales large, less than 50 in lat. line. F. lateral line entirely wanting.— ERIMYZON. FF. Lateral line more or less developed, especially in the adult.— MINYTREMA. DD. Air bladder in 3 parts; scales large; lateral line complete. G. Mouth normal, the lower lip entire or merely lobed, the upper lip pro- tractile. H. Pharyngeal bones moderate, the teeth compressed, not molar-like, increasing in size gradually downward.— MoOxXOSTOMA. HH. Pharyngeal bones very strong, the lowerteeth very much enlarged, cylindrical and truncate, molar-like.— PLACOPHARYNX. GG. Mouth singular, the upper lip not protractile, greatly enlarged, the lower lip developed as two separate lobes.— LAGOCHILA. Genus: ICTIOBUS. rey to Species. A. Mouth large, terminal, protractile forward ; lips very thin, lower pharyngeals and teeth weak.— cyprinella. AA. Mouth smaller, more or less inferior, and with thicker lips; pharyngeal bones. stronger ; the teeth comparatively coarse and large. ‘ B. Back scarcely elevated, depth 3 to 3% in length.— uUrus. BB. Back elevated and compressed, depth 2% to 234.— bubalus. Ictiobus cyprinella (Cuvier and Valenciennes). COMMON BUFFALO FISH ;. RED-MOUTHED BUFFALO. Head very large and thick, 3% inlength ; depth 2% to3%. Developed rays of dorsal fin 27 to 29; anal g; ventrals 10. Scales 7-37 to 41-6. Body robust, moderately compressed, the outline somewhat elliptical, but the back rather more curved than the belly. Opercular apparatus very strong, the operculum forming nearly % the length of the head. Color dull brownish olive, not silvery, fins dusky. Length nearly 3 feet. CATOSTOMID AS. 31 According to Jordan, the Red-mouthed Buffalo Fish abounds in the Ohio river and its larger tributaries, and Henshall reports it ‘‘ very common in Ohio river.’’ Not reported for any other locality. Ictiobus urus (Agassiz). MONGREL BUFFALO; RAZOR-BACKED BUFFALO. Head very stout, strongly transversely convex, thicker, larger and less pointed than in /. dubalus, about 4 in length. Eye about equal to snout, 5% in head, much smaller than in /. dubalus. Mouth large, considerably oblique, approaching that of /. cyfrinella. Body much less elevated and compressed than in /. dubalus, the back not at all carinated ; 3 to 34% in length. D. 30; A. 10; scales 8-41-7. Longest ray of dorsal scarcely ¥% the length of base of fin; anal rounded. Colors very dark, fins all black. ‘‘ Not always separable from /. cyprinella, and perhaps not really different.’’ Ohio river at Cincinnati, Henshall, 1889. Not mentioned by- any other collector. Ictiobus bubalus (Rafinesque). BUFFALO FISH; SMALIL-MOUTHED BUFFALO ; RAZOR-BACK ; SUCKER-MOUTHED BUFFALO. Hlead moderate, triangular in outline when viewed from the side, 4 in. length, mouth quite small: Body considerably elevated and compressed above ; the dorsal region sub-carinate, the belly thicker ; depth 2% to 23f. Highest dorsal ray reaching much beyond middle of fin; D. 29; A. 10; V. 10; scales 8-39-6. Color brownish olive, paler below, the lower fins slightly dusky. Length 30 inches. Recorded by Rafinesque for the Ohio, ‘‘as far as Pittsburg.’’ Also recorded for the state by Kirtland. ‘‘ Abundant in the Ohio. river,” Henshall, 1888. Not recorded for any other point of the- state. Genus: CARPIODES. Key to Species. A. Body sub-fusiform, depth about 3in length. Dorsal with about 30rays.— carpio. AA. Body ovate oblong, the back eleva’ed, depth about 2% in length. B. Lips thin, silvery white, the halves meeting in a wide angle. & Head large, snout blunt ; eye large, 3% to 4.— difformis. CC. Head small and pointed, the snout projecting, eye small, 5 to 5% in. head.— thompson. BB. Lips full, thick, reddish in life, the halves of lower lip meeting in an acute - angle.— velifer. Carpiodes carpio (Rafinesque). BIG CARP SUCKER. Head comparatively short, 4 to 5 in body. Body more fusiform than in_ Others of the genus, compressed, but not much arched, depth 2% to 3.. 32 THE FISHES OF OHIO. Anterior rays of dorsal short, much thickened and osseus at base, especially in adults, the longest ray a little more than ¥% the base of the fin, which con- sists of 30 rays; caudal moderately forked. Eye medium, anterior, 4% in head. Muzzle short, but projecting beyond mouth. 36scales in lateral line. Limited in its distribution to the Ohio and its larger tribu- taries. ‘‘ The commonest species of its genus in the Ohio river, and it is often found in the streams of the interior,’’ Jordan. Very abundant in the Ohio river, Henshall, 1888; Ohio river at Bellaire, R. C. Osburn, 1900. Carpiodes difformis Cope. Snout very blunt, the maxillary reaching to front of pupil. Nostrils very near tip of snout. Lips thin, silvery colored in life, the lower q-shaped. Head 4% in body; depth 2% to 234, the back considerably elevated. Eye quite large, 3% to 4 in head. D. 24, its first rays very high; A. 8; V. 9; scales, 6-35-4. Recorded for the state by Jordan, under the name of C, cutisanserinus (Cope), as ‘‘ abundant in the Ohio.’’ C. cutisan- serinus 1s now regarded as identical with C. difformzs. ‘* Abund- ant in Ohio river, young common in Little Miami river,’’ Hen- shall, 1888. Klippart, in his first report, says of this species, that it ‘‘abounds in Lake Erie, but this must be a mistake, prob- ably in regard to the species, as C. difformts is not, I believe, known to occur in the St. Lawrence System.’’ Carpiodes thompsoni Agassiz. LAKE CARP. Body stout, short, the back much elevated, depth 2% in length. Head small, 4 to 4% in length, the snout pointed; lips thin, white, meeting at a wide angle. Eye small, 5 to 5% in head. Tip of lower jaw much in advance -of nostrils ; maxillary reaching line of orbit. Dorsal of about 27 rays, aris- ing about midway from snout to base of caudal, its anterior rays high, % as long as base of fin. A.7; V. 10; scales rather closely imbricated, 8-39 to -Ao-6. ‘Abundant in Lake Erie. I have examined many specimens ‘from Sandusky ' Bay,’’ Jordan; Lake Hrie, Henshall, 1ééo) Lorain County, ‘‘not very common,’’ McCormick, 1892; Lake Erie at Toledo, Jordam-and ‘Hvermann (Bull.-47,°U:-S. Navi Mus. ). CATOSTOMIDA. a2 Carpiodes velifer (Rafinesque). Qui_L BACK; SPEARFISH. Head 33/ to 4; lips thick, full, flesh-colored in life, the halves of the lower meeting at an acute angle; muzzle projecting, conic; eye 4 to5in head. Back much arched ; depth 2% to 3. Dorsal fin of about 27 rays, the anterior rays very long and filamentous, sometimes as long as the base of the fin. Caudal deeply forked, its lobes slender, the upper lobe the longer. Scales 7-35-5. Recorded by Rafinesque for the Ohio river as far as Pittsburg. ‘‘Quite common in Ohio river, young ones common in Little Miami river and tributaries,’’ Henshall, 1888; Maumee river at Antwerp, Defiance, Grand Rapids and Toledo, Tiffin river at Brunersburg, Auglaize river at Cloverdale, Oakwood and Defi- ance, Blanchard river at Ottawa and Cloverdale, Hoaglin creek near Oakland, Beaver creek at Grand Rapids, ‘‘ rather common at all these points,’’ Kirsch, 1893 ; Scioto river, Scioto Big Run, Mason’s Run and Hell Branch, Williamson and Osburn, 1897 ; Scioto river at Ironton, Wabash river at Celina, Wolf creek near Dayton, North Fork of Licking river at Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Breakneck creek and Cuyahoga river near Kent, Chippewa lake, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMahon’s Run at Bellaire, R. C. Osburn, 1900. Cycleptus elongatus (Le Sueur). BLACK HORSE ; MISSOURI SUCKER. Depth 4 to 5; head 6 to 8%; eye small, 6 to 7in head. D. 30, its long- est ray a little longer than head; A. 7 or 8; scales 9-56-7. Color very dark, males in spring almost black. Length 2% feet. Apparently confined in this state to the Ohio river. ‘‘ As faras Pittsburg,’’ Rafinesque. Recorded for the Ohio by Kirtland and by Jordan, and Henshall in 1888 mentions it as ‘‘ not uncommon in the Ohio river. 34 THE, SELSERE S SOE ORO. Genus: CATOSTOMUS. Key to Species. AC Head transversely convex above, the orbital rim not elevated, scales in lateral line 60 or more. Be Scales in lateral line about roo.— catostomus. BB. Scales in lateral line 64 to 70.— COMLMEYSONI1. AA. Head broad, depressed, and transversely convex between the orbits; scalesin lateral line, 48 to 55. NIZVICANS. Catostomus catostomus (Forster). NORTHERN SUCKER. This species can at once be distinguished from the others of the genus occurring in Ohio, by the great number of scales in the lateral line, 95 to 114. About 29 cross rows between dorsal and ventrals. Head broad above, pointed in front ; snout a little longer than remainder of head and much overhang- ing the mouth. Body rather slender and somewhat terete. D. 10; A. 7. Color, above, smoky gray; below, white. Length 2% feet. This species is one of northern distribution, probably not occuring in the tributaries of the Ohio. ‘‘ Quite abundant in Lake Erie,’’ Jordan (Ohio Rept. ), 1878; Lake Erie, Henshall 1889. Catostomus commersonii (Lacepede). COMMON SUCKER ; FINE-SCALED SUCKER. Head rather conical, 44 in length of body, flattish above, but not con- cave between the eyes. Body moderately stout, terete or sub-terete, becom- ing heavier at the shoulders with age, depth 4 to 5 in length. D. 11 or 12; scales small, 10-64 to 70-9. Color olivaceous, tending toward blackish on ‘back and lateral line. Length 18 inches. One of the commonest species in the state, found in abund- ance in nearly every stream. Recorded for the state by Kuirt- land for the Big Miami, and small brooks of northern Ohio ; ‘Swarming in every pond and stream in Ohio,’’ Jordan (Ohio Rept.); Hamilton County, ‘‘ Everywhere abundant,’’ Henshall, 1888; Lorain County, ‘“‘ Very common in all our waters,” McCorinick, 1892 ; recorded by Kirsch for nearly every locality seined in the Maumee River System, 1893; taken by Mr. Wil- hamson and myself in every stream in Franklin County, 1897; in every stream of the Big Jelloway Creek System in Knox County, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898; taken by myself in 1899, at the following places: Ohio river and Ice creek at CATOSTOMIDA. SS Ironton, John’s creek at Waterloo, Huron river at Milan, Ashta- bula creek at Ashtabula, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks near Dayton, and North Fork of Licking river at Newark ; and in 1900 in the Cuyahoga river at Hawkins, Break- neck creek near Kent, Chippewa lake, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin river at Willoughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMahon’s Run at Bellaire, and Licking reservoir. Catostomus nigricans Le Sueur. Hoc SucCKER; STONE ROLLER. Head large, concave between the eyes, 44% in length. Body -nearly terete, depth 4% to5. D.10 or 11; scales 48 to 55 in lateral line. Color, olive, becoming brownish on the back, which is crossed by several dark, irregular blotches ; belly white. Length 2 feet. This Sucker is very widely distributed over the state, being found in all suitable localities. Its especial haunts are clear, stony ripples and rock-bottomed pools. Not taken in lakes. Kirtland records it as two species, //ypentelium macropterum and Catostomus nigrans; “extremely abundant in every running stream in Ohio,’ Jordan (Ohio Rept.); Hamilton County, ““everywhere abundant,’’ Henshall, 1888; Lorain County, McCormick, 1892; Kirsch, 1893, records it for the streams at nearly all points investigated in the Maumee River System, ‘‘ none taken “in the lakes’’; Franklin County, Scioto river, Olentangy river, Scioto Big Run, Grant’s Run, Big Walnut creek, Rocky Fork, Black Lick, Alum creek, Big and Little Darby creeks and Hell Branch, Williamson and Osburn, 1897; every stream in the Big Jelloway Creek System, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898 ; Ohio river and Ice creek at Ironton, John’s creek at Water- loo, Huron river at Milan, Ashtabula creek at Ashtabula, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks near Dayton and North Fork of Licking river at Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899 ; Cuyahoga river at Hawkins, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin river at Willoughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMahon’s creek at Bellaire, and the outlet of Licking eservoir into Licking river, R. C. Osburn, 1900. 36 THE FISHES OF OHIO. Genus: HRIMYZON. Erimyzon sucetta oblongus (Mitchell). SWEET SUCKER ; CHUB SUCKER. Head 4 to 44% in length; snout not projecting ; eye 4% to 43¢ in head. Body stout, compressed ; depth in adults about 3, but younger specimens. much more slender ; back arched, old specimens becoming quite gibbous at the nape. Lateral line entirely wanting. Scales about 4o, closely imbri- cated and somewhat crowded anteriorly, sometimes showing irregularities of arrangement. Length 1oinches. Color varying with age, in adults brown or brownish olive above, with a tendency to brassy on sides and belly ; younger specimens are plain olivaceous, occasionally bright, ‘‘ gold-fish yellow’’ ; very young with a distinct, black lateral band, which breaks up- into blotches a little later. Ohio specimens show some variations between the typical Z&. sucet/a and the variety oblongus, but seem to agree more closely with the variety than with the typical form. The Chub Sucker, or Sweet Sucker, is widely distributed over the state, but its occurrence is irregular. At some points itis an abundant species, at others rare. ‘‘ Common in Little Miami and Ohio rivers,’’ Henshall, 1888 ; ‘‘ not common, I have taken a few in the lower part of Beaver creek,’’ McCormick, 1892 ; Maumee river at Toledo, St. Joseph river at Edgerton, St. Mary’s river at St. Mary’s, Tiffin river at West Unity, Lost and Gordon creeks near Cecil, Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, Scioto river, Scioto: Big Run, Grant’s Run, Big Darby, Little Darby and aie Branch, Osburn and Williamson, 1897; Ohio river at Ironton,, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks near Dayton, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Licking reservoir, K. B. Williamson ; San-- dusky Bay, very common in Black Channel, Grand river at: Painesville, Chagrin river at Willoughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, and Ohio river and McMahon creek at Bellaire, R. C. Osburn, Igoo. Genus: MINYTREMA. Minytrema melanops (Rafinesque). WINTER SUCKER ; SPOTTED SUCKER} STRIPED SUCKER. Head 4Y ; snout round, a trifle projecting. Body elongate, somewhat terete, back somewhat arched in front of dorsal fin; depth about 4. D. 127 A. 7. Scales about 46. Lateral line wanting in young, present but more or less interrupted in adults. Coloration dusky olive above, each scale with a. more or less distinct black spot at its base, these forming rows along the rows of scales. Length about 18 inches. CATOSTOMIDAS, 37 Not usually a common species, though widely distributed. Recorded by Kirtland, 1838; Hamilton County, Little Miami and tributaries, Henshall, 1888; Lorain County, ‘‘ Rare, Ver- million river and Beaver creek,’’ McCormick, 1892; Maumee river at Grand Rapids, St. Joseph river at Edgerton, Fish creek at Edgerton, St. Mary’s river at St..Mary’s and Rockford, Auglaize river at Wapakoneta and Cloverdale, Blanchard river at Findlay, Kirsch, 1893 ; Franklin County, Scioto river, Olentangy river, Black Lick, Little Walnut and Big Darby, Williamson and Osburn, 1897 ; Stillwater creek near Dayton, and Wabash river near Celina, R. C. Osburn, 1899. At the latter place, in a series of pools formed by the outlet of St. Mary’s reservoir, the species was taken in abundance, the only time I have ever taken more than a few individuals in one locality. Genus: MOxXOSTOMA. Key to Species. A. Dorsal fin of 15 to 18 rays; lower lip V-shaped.— anisurum. AA. Dorsal fin of less than 15 rays; lower lip truncate behind, not evidently V-shaped. B. Head rather large, 4 to nearly 5in length, snout little projecting.—aureolum. BB. Head smalland conic, about 5% in length, the snout much projecting beyond the small mouth.— breviceps. Moxostoma anisurum (Rafinesque). WHITE-NOSED SUCKER. Head short and broad, flattened above, 3% to 44% in length, eye midway ain head, 4 to 5 in its length. Body compressed; back high, considerably amore arched than in J7, aureolum, depth 3% in length. Fins all large. Color bright olivaceous to smoky above, white or silvery on sides and belly. Most easily distinguished from other species of the genus occurring in Ohio, by the long dorsal fin, containing from 15 to 18 rays. This species is found in both the Lake and Ohio river drain- age, but is not usually very common, and is confined to the larger streams. Ohio river, ‘‘as far as Pittsburg,’’ Rafinesque. Given by Jordan (Ohio Rept.) as three species—J7/. anisurum, of which he says, ‘‘I have seen a few specimens, obtained in the Cincin- nati market’’; MZ. velatum, ‘‘ frequently taken in the Ohio river and its tributaries,’’.and JZ, carpio, from Lake Erie and the Ohio at Cincinnati and Marietta. These three are now regarded as synonymous (See Bull. 47, U. S. Natl. Mus.). Hamilton County, 38 THE FISHES OF OHIO. not uncommon in Ohio river, Henshall, 1888; Lorain County, McCormick, 1892; Maumee river at Antwerp, Defiance and Toledo ; Tiffin river at West Unity and Brunersburg, Auglaize river at Cloverdale, Oakwood and Defiance; Blanchard river at Ottawa, Hoaglin creek near Oakwood, Beaver creek at Grand Rapids, Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, Scioto river, Olentangy river and Alum creek, Williamson and Osburn, 1897 ; Ohio river at Ironton; Huron -river at “Malan R. "°C." Osburn, 1860. 7@me river at Bellaire, Licking reservoir, R. C. Osburn; 1900. Moxostoma aureolum (Le Sueur). RED-HORSE ; MULLET; WHITE SUCKER. Head 4 to 5, flattened above ; snout slightly projecting ; eye 43/ in head. Body rather stout, somewhat compressed ; back, little elevated; depth 4 in length. D. 13. or more rarely 12 or 14; A. 7; scales about 45. Coloroliva- ceous above, sides silvery ; lower fins reddish, especially during the breed-- ing season. Until very recent years this has been recorded as two species, the short-headed, small-mouthed form as JZ. auveolum, and the more ordinary form as J7. macrolepidotum duquesnii (Ie Sueur). This matter is cleared up by Jordan and Evermann (Bull. 47, U.S. Natl. Mus.). It is very probable that some collectors have confused the short-headed form with JZ. breviceps (Cope), as I can find no record of AZ. breviceps for Ohio 1n any paper preceding Bull. 47, U. S. Natl. Mus., in which 1t is recorded as ‘abimdamt in some portions of the state. However, as I have no direct evi- dence of any such error, I include all records for J. aureolum and JZ. macrolepidotum dugquesnit under AZ. aureolum. Ohio river, ‘‘ as far as Pittsburg,’ Rafimesque ; recorded forthe stare by Kirtland as Catostomus aureolus, C. Duguesnit and C. ery- thurus ; Hamilton County, ‘‘ abundant in all streams explored,”’ Lake Erie, Henshall, 1888-89; Lorain County, McCormick, 1892; Maumee river at Defiance, Grand Rapids and Waterville, St. Mary’s river at Rockford, Auglaize river at Oakwood, Sugar creek at Lima, St. Joseph river at Edgerton, west. end of Lake Erie, Kirsch, 1893 ; Franklin County, ‘‘abundant,-taken in alk but the smallest streams,’’ Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Knox County, Big Jelloway creek system, ‘‘ abundant, the young fry CATOSTOMID A. 39 ascending even the smallest brooks,’’ May 26 given as a breeding date, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898 ; Ohio river and Ice creek at Ironton, John’s creek at Waterloo, Huron river at Milan, Sandusky Bay, Ashtabula creek at Ashtabula, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks near Dayton, North Fork of Licking river at Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Niggermill Run at Salem, E. B. Williamson, 1900; Cuyahoga river at Hawkins, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin river at Willoughby, Wheel- ing creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMahon creek at Wheeling, Licking reservoir, R. C. Osburn, 1900. Moxostoma breviceps (Cope). Form of a Coregonus, with deep, compressed body, small head, and a conic snout, which overhangs the very small mouth. Caudal fin, with the ‘upper lobe falcate, much longer than the lower. Dorsal fin short, high, falcate, the anterior rays 114 to 1% times base of fin, the free border much concave. Depth 3% inlength. Head5to5%. D.120r13. Scales 6—45-5. Lower fins bright red. ‘Abundant in Lake Erie; our specimens from Sandusky, Toledo and Cincinnati,’’ Jordan and Evermann (Bull. 47, U. S. Natl. Mus. ). Genus: PLACOPHARYNX. Placopharynx duquesnii (Le Sueur). Head 4; snout rounded, projecting ; lower jaw somewhat oblique when closed ; eye 4% in head. Body rather stout, somewhat compressed, in form like that of J7. aureolum,; D. 13; A. 7 (not 9, as is usually given, in any Ohio specimens I have seen); scales 6-45-6. Lower pharyngeal bones very strong, the lower teeth on these bones very strong and molar-like, little compressed, and having broad grinding surfaces. ‘ This species so closely resembles 7, aureolum that it can be positively distinguished only by the appearance of the lower pharyngeal teeth, and it has no doubt been much overlooked. Recorded by Jordan (Ohio Rept.) on the strength of a skeleton found by Dr. J. M. Wheaton in the Scioto river at Columbus, one of the very few specimens known at that time. The species has since proved to be well distributed over the state, though not usually abundant. Hamilton County, not rare in the Ohio, Hen- shall, 1888; Lorain County, Lake Erie, common with other 40 THE FISHES OF (OHIO. mullets, McCormick, 1892; Franklin County, Scioto river, Olen- tangy river and Big Darby creek, Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Ohio river at Ironton, Wabash river at Celina, R. C. Osburn, 1899 ; Ohio river at Bellaire, R. C. Osburn, 1900. Génus: AVACOCHIELA. Lagochila lacera Jordan and Brayton. HARE-LIP SUCKER; CuT-LIPS. Head short, conical, with lengthened snout, the region between the eyes flattened and with prominent mucous ridges. Cheeks and lower part of head rather swollen. Opercle much reduced, its greatest length scarcely greater than diameter of eye. Head 4% in length. Eye 4% in head, 2 in length of snout. Body rather slender, depth 474. Dorsal fin rather low, its rays 12 ; A. 73 V.9; scales 5-45-5. Mouth very singular ; the upper lip is broad and fleshy, not separated from the skin of the forehead by a crease ; at each side of the mouth a sharp fold of skin is formed, which descends to the mid line below, passing under the lower jaw, but is separated from that of the oppo- site side by a longitudinal crease; in front of these the fleshy lower lip is split into two large depending lobes. This species has been recorded for but three localities in the state. Its rare occurrence in the state was first noted by Dr. Jordan in Klippart’s ‘‘Second, Annual Report of the Ohio State Fish Commission for 1877,’’ where he says: ‘‘ Mr. Klip- part finds it very abundant in the Scioto, where it has been over- looked by all the collectors from Rafinesque and Kirtland down,’’ and Mr. Klippart further comments: ‘‘ The fisherman assured me that he had taken them several years in succession.’’ Twenty years later, the investigations on the fishes of Franklin County, | carried on by Mr. Williamson and the writer, and extending over a period of several years, failed to bring to light a single speci- men of this species, though the Scioto river was hauled in many places. The species has been taken in the state by Kirsch, in 1893, in the Auglaize river at Cloverdale, and in the Blanchard Tiver at Ottawa. KEY TO GENERA.—CYPRINIDA. 4I Family: Cyprinipa (The Minnows). Key to Genera. I. (Dorsal fin long, with 2 or 3 spines, and 18 or 2orays ; introduced species. A. Teeth in 3 rows, I, I, 3-3.1, 1, all molar; 4 barbels.— CYPRINUS. AA. Teethin 1 row, 4-4, molar, but compressed ; barbels wanting.— CARASSIUS.) II. Dorsal fin short, without developed spine. A. Air bladder surrounded by many convolutions of the very long alimentary canal.— CAMPOSTOMA. AA. Air bladder above the alimentary canal, not surrounded by convolutions of the intestine. B. Alimentary canal more than twice the length of body; teeth in 1 row? peritoneum usually black. ec. Teeth 5-5 or 4-5; scales minute.— CHROSOMUS. CC. Teeth 4-4; scales larger. D. A small barbel present at base of maxillary ; color silvery.— ‘ HYBOGNATHUS. DD. Barbel wanting; color olivaceous, little silvery.—PIMEPHALES. BB. Alimentary canal less than twice the length of body; peritoneum usually silvery. E. Lower jaw normally formed, dentary bones free from each other except at the symphysis. F. ‘Teethin main row 5-5 or 4-5. G. Abdomen rounded behind ventral fins, not compressed into a scaleless ridge; anal basis short. H. A minute barbel present on maxillary at a little distance above its base.— SEMOTILUS. HH. Maxillary without barbel. I. Teeth in 2 rows, 2, 4-5, 2.— LEUCISCUS. II. TYeethinzrrow, 5-5. Mouth extremely small.— OPSOPCODUS. GG. Abdomen compressed behind ventral fins into a sharp, scealeless ridge; anal basis longer.— ABRAMIS. FF. Teeth in main row 4-4. Tie Maxillary without barbel. K. No cavernous lymph spaces visible in pene sub-opercle and inter-opercle. re. First (rudimentary) ray of dorsal detached from the first developed ray and connected to it by a membrane; a conspicuous black spot at base of caudal and dorsal.—CLIoLa. LL. First (rudimentary) ray closely attached to first developed ray.— NOTROPIS. KK. Mandible, sub-opercle and inter-opercle, with con- spicuous, externally visible, cavernous lymph chambers.— ERICYMBA. JJ. Maxillary barbel present. M. Premaxillaries not protractile, connected to skin of ‘ forehead in the median line without a cross groove; teeth 2, 4-4, 2. RHINICHTHYS. MM. Premaxillaries protractile, a cross groove separat- ing them from the skin of forehead in front; only 1 tooth in lesser row.— HYBOPSIS. “EE. Lower jaw singularly formed, the dentary bones parallel and united for their entire length ; a conspicuous, fleshy lobe on each side at base.— EXOGLOSSUM. A2 THE FISHES OF OHIO. Genus: CYPRINUS. Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus. THE CARP. The Carp may be readily distinguished from any of our native Cyprinid@ by the presence of four long barbels, and by the very long dorsal fin—about 20 rays—preceded by a stout spine, which is serrated behind. Anal fin short, of about 5 rays, also preceded by aspine. The lower pharyngeal teeth, unlike those of any native American Minnow, are in 3 rows, I, I, 3-3,1, 1. The lateral line is complete. Many varieties have resulted from cultivation. Chief among these are the ‘‘ Full-scale,”’ in which the body is covered with strong scales, after the formula, 6-40-5; the “‘ Half-scale’ or ‘‘ Mirror,” characterized by a few rows of very large scales; and the ‘‘ Leather Carp,’’ in which the scales are entirely absent. The Carp was first introduced into the state to stock ponds and lakes, but, escaping from cultivation, has become generally distributed over the state and occurs in streams as well as ponds and lakes. Recorded for the state by Henshall, 1889, in Ross lake and Little Miami river; Lorain County, occasionally taken in the rivers, McCormick, 1892; Maumee river at Toledo (abundant), St. Marys river at Rockford, Tiffin river at West Unity, and west end of Lake Erie (abundant), Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, ‘of general distribution throughout the county,’’? Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Knox County, Big Jelloway creek, ‘‘ very common,’’ Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898; very common in Sandusky Bay, R. C. Osburn, 1899;. Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river at Bellaire, and Licking reservoir,. RR. CoOsbiirn oo; Genus: CARASSIUS. Carassius auratus (Linnaeus). GOLDFISH. The Goldfish may be distinguished from our native Minnows by the very long dorsal’ fin, preceded bya stout, serrated spine; the anal of 7 rays, witha similar spine. From. the Carp it is distinguished by the absence of the barbels about the mouth, and by the teeth, which are 4-4. Asin the Carp, cultivation has produced many varieties. It has escaped from cultivation in some parts of Ohio, and has been reported by Henshall, 1888, as ‘‘ not rare in the canal basin near Elmwood, Hamilton County. Genus: ‘TINCA. Tinca tinca (Linnaeus). TENCH. In the spring of 1898 afreshet carried away the banks of an artificial lake on the grounds of the Ohio State University, at Columbus, and many of the Tench, with which the lake was stocked, escaped into the Olentangy river. In September of the same year specimens were taken at the mouth. of the small stream flowing from the lake to the river. Whether the Tench. will hold its own in the streams of Ohio yet remains to be seen. CYPRINIDS. 43 Genus: CAMPOSTOMA. Campostoma anomalum (Rafinesque). STONE-ROLLER;. STEEL-BACKED CHUB; MAMMY : DOUGH-BELLY. This species is most easily distinguished by an examination of the intes- tine, which is very long and is wound in many convolutions about the air- bladder. This arrangement is peculiar to this genus among all known fishes. Head 4; depth 42; eye 5 to 5% in head; D. 8; A. 7; scales 7-48-6; teeth 4-4. Body stoutish. Snout somewhat decurved, mouthinferior. Color brownish,. almost black in adult breeding males; sides brassy, irregularly mottled with dark olivaceous or brown; fins usually plain, in breeding males the dorsal is tinged with orange, a black bar through its middle, other fins more or less tinged with orange. Entire dorsum of breeding males covered with tuber- cles. Young with a dark lateral band extending onto gill covers and between. eye and tip of snout. Length 6 to 8 inches. A very abundant and widely distributed species, generally most abundant in small streams and on ripples of larger ones.. First recorded for the state by Kirtland under the name Exog/os- sum lesueurianum ; given by Jordan as ‘‘extremely abundant in every stream in the state’’; Hamilton County, ‘‘ abundant in every stream explored,’’ Henshall, 1888 ; Lorain County, ‘‘ com-. mon in most of our streams,’’ McCormick, 1892; Franklin County, ‘‘ very abundant everywhere,’’ Williamson and Osburn, 1897 ; Big Jelloway creek system, ‘‘ apparently the most abund- ant species,’ Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898; recorded for many places in the Maumee river system (not taken in St. Mary’s river) by Kirsch, 1893; Ohio river and Ice creek at Ironton, Huron river at Milan, Ashtabula creek at Ashtabula, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks near Dayton, Hob fork of Ticking river at Newark, R. C. Osburn,: 1899; Niggermill Run at Salem, E. B. Williamson, 1900; Cuyahoga river at Kent and Hawkins, Breakneck creek at Kent, Chippewa. lake, Summit lake, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin river at Willoughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMahon creek at Bellaire, Licking reservoir, R. C. Osburn,, 1900. : 44 THE FISHES OF OHIO. Genus: CHROSOMUS. Chrosomus erythrogaster Rafinesque. RED-BELLIED DACE. Head 4; depth 4; eye 34%. D:. 8; A. 8; teeth 5-5; scales 16-85-10: Body rather elongate, the head pointed; mouth small, terminal, somewhat oblique. Lateral line developed backward about as far as the dorsal fin. Color above, brownish; a black vertebral line, bordered on either side by a row of black dots; sides creamy white, bordered above and below with a black band, the lower the wider and extending forward through eye; under parts white, in breeding males entirely suffused with vermillion; fins all bright sulphur yellow, the dorsal with a bright red spot at its base, anteriorly; females and young less brilliantly colored. Length 2 to 3 inches. The Red-bellied Dace is widely distributed and is generally abundant where found, but it is strictly a ‘‘ brook species,’’ being confined to small clear streams and spring runs. Recorded for the state by Dr. Kirtland ; Lorain County, ‘‘ I have found them in but one stream, Spring brook,’’ McCormick, 1892 ; ‘‘ collected by Prof. Meek in Lost: creek, “mear Defiance,” Kirsehireeae Franklin County, Grant’s Run and Plum Run, tributaries of the Scioto river, in abundance, Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Knox County, Parker’s Run, a tributary of Big Jelloway creek, “in considerable numbers,’’ Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898 ; Licking County, occurring in abundance in spring runs tributary to North Fork of Licking river near Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Niggermill Run at Salem, E. B. Williamson, 1goo. Genus: YBOGNATHUS. Hybognathus nuchalis Agassiz. SILVERY MINNOW. Head 4% to 5; depth 4%; ‘eye 4; D. 8; A. 7; teeth 4-4; scales 5-38-4. Body elongate, comparatively slender. Head moderate, the profile evenly ‘curved; upper jaw heavy, lower thin. Scales large and silvery, 12 to 14 in front of dorsal. Lateral line decurved. Intestines very long, 7 to Io times the length of body. Color olivaceous green above, translucent in life; sides -clear silvery; fins plain. Length 4 to 7 inches. This species seems'to be confined to the southwestern part of the state. Jordan, in his Ohio Report, gives it as abundant in small streams flowing into the Ohio river, but Dr. Henshall records it for only White Oak creek and the Ohio river, and in my work at Ironton and Bellaire I failed to find it. This species is not mentioned by any other collector. CYPRINIDS. 45 Genus: PIMEPHALES. Key to Species. 7. Lateral line more or less incomplete; body very short and stout.— promelas. AA. Lateral line complete; body moderately elongate.-- notatus. Pimephales promelas Rafinesque. FAT-HEAD. Head 4; depth 33 to 4; eye 4. D.I, 7; A. 7; scales 7 or 8-43 to 47-5 or- 6. Body very short and deep. Head short, everywhere convex, almost globular in adult males. Scales deep, closely imbricated; lateral line incom- plete. Color dark olivaceous above, paler below; a dark lateral band and caudal spot; dorsal fin with a dusky shade through it at the middle, Breed- ing males with the head nearly black, with tubercles on snout and lower jaw. Length 2% inches. Recorded by Kirtland. Given by Jordan as most abundant in small streams flowing into the Ohio ; Hamilton County, ‘‘ very abundant everywhere,’’ Henshall, 1888; Lorain County, ‘‘ not common, but found in most of the streams,’’ McCormick, 1892 ; Maumee river at Cecil, Lost and Gordon creeks near Cecil, Sugar ereek at Lima, Kirsch, 1893; Knox County, Big Jelloway creek, rare, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898 ; Ohio river at Iron- ton, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks near Dayton, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Niggermill Run at Salem, E. B. Williamson, 1900; Pippin lake, Cuyahoga river at Hawkins, Ohio river at Bellaire, R. C. Osburn, rgoo. ; Pimephales notatus (Rafinesque). BLUNT-NOSED MINNOW. Head 4°34; depth 4% to 5; eye 4. D.I, 7 or 8; A. 7; scales 6—45-4, 22 in front of dorsal, much crowded and irregularly arranged anteriorly. Body rather elongate. Head moderate, the snout very blunt and convex; top of head depressed; mouth small, inferior, horizontal. Color olivaceous, some- times very dark; a black spot at base of dorsal fin in front. Males in breed- ing season with the head black or nearly so, and with about 16 large tuber-. cles on the snout. Length 4 inches. This species is much more abundant than the preceding. ‘Swarms in all the streams of the state,’’ Jordan; Hamilton County, ‘‘ the most abundant minnow,’’ Henshall. 1888; Lorain County, ‘‘ very abundant in small streams,’’ McCormick, 1892 ; Kirsch records it for every stream of the Maumee river system explored in Ohio; Franklin County, ‘‘ our most abundant minnow, 46 THE FISHWS (On O10: in great numbers in every stream,’’ Williamson and Osburn, 1897 ; Knox County, abundant in every stream of the Big Jellow- way creek system, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898 ; Ohio river and Ice creek at Ironton, Huron river at Milan, Sandusky Bay, Ashtabula creek at Ashtabula,* Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks near Dayton, North Fork of Licking river near Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Niggermill Run at Salem, Mahoning river, E. B. Williamson, 1900; Pippin lake, Chippewa lake, Summit lake, Cuyahoga river at Kent and Haw- kins, Breakneck creek at Kent, Grand river at Painesville, Cha- grin river at Willoughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMahon’s creek at Bellaire, Licking reservoir, R/€. Osburn, 1900. Genus: SEMOTILUS. Semotilus atromaculatus (Mitchill). HorNED DACcE; CHUB. Head 334; depth 43; eye 5 to5%. D.7; A. 8; scales 9-55 to 60-6, about 30 in front of dorsal; teeth 2, 5-4, 2. Head large and heavy, broad and rounded above; snout broad; mouth broad, oblique; a small barbel on the maxillary some distance above its posterior end, not evident in young speci- mens. Body stout, arched in front of dorsal. Dorsal inserted behind ven- trals. Color dusky olivaceous or bluish above, paler below; sides with a brassy luster; an indistinct lateral band and caudal spot (these markings distinct in young). Dorsal with a black spot at its base anteriorly. Sides of head and lower fins rosy in breeding males. These have also the snout covered with tubercles. Length ro inches. A widely distributed species, occurring abundantly in brooks throughout the state, less commonly in the larger streams, and rarely in lakes. In seining up stream the increase in number of individuals of this species as the headwaters are approached is very noticeable. Kirtland, following Rafinesque, recorded it for the state as two species, S. dorsalis and \S. cephalus. Both are synonyms of S. atvomaculatus. Hamilton County, “‘abundant in all streams,’’ Henshall, 1888 ; Lorain County, ‘“‘ abundant in most of the streams,’’ McCormick, 1892 ; generally distributed throughout the Maumee river basin,’’ Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, abundant in all streams, Williamson and Osburn, 1897 ; Knox County, Big Jelloway creek system, Parker, Williamson ce CYPRINID. 47 and Osburn, 1898; Ice creek at Ironton, John’s creek at Water- loo, Huron river at Milan, Ashtabula creek at Ashtabula, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks near Dayton, North Fork of Licking river at Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Nigger- mill Run at Salem, Mahoning river, E. B. Williamson, 1900 ; Sandusky Bay, Cuyahoga river at Kent and Hawkins, Breakneck creek at Kent, Chippewa lake, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin river at Willoughby, R. C. Osburn, rIgoo. Genus: LEUCISCUS. Leuciscus elongatus (Kirtland). RED-SIDED DACE. Head 4; depth 5; eye 4to 4%. D.8; A. 9; scales 10-70-5; teeth 2, 5-4, 2. Body elongate, compressed; head long, pointed; mouth very large, _ oblique, the maxillary extending to middle of orbit ; lower jaw projecting, with a small knob at its symphysis. Color above varying froma dark blu- ish to greenish, sides somewhat paler and mottled; a dark vertebral line; along the side isa broad band, bright blood red anteriorly, black posteriorly, the two colors shading into each other imperceptibly at about middle of body; above this band is a narrow brassy band; belly silvery white. In breeding males the belly and lower fins are tinged with rosy; in females and young the bright colors are subdued or wanting. Length 5 inches. The Red-sided Shiner is certainly one of the most elegant of fishes. It is, generally speaking, a brook species, inhabiting clear deep pools of brooks and spring runs, though Dr. Kirtland, who described the species, records it for Lake Erie. It is found in the tributaries of the Ohio and of the Lake, but has not been noticed in the western part of the state. Mahoning river in - armen County, and Lake Erie near Cleveland, Kirtland ; Lorain County, ‘‘common in Spring brook, but not found else- where,’’ McCormick, 1892 ; Knox County, Little Jelloway creek, Black Run, Parker’s Run, Joe Sapp Run, Shadly Run and Doudy ‘creek, tributaries of Big Jelloway creek, common, Parker, Will- iamson and Osburn, 1898; Wilson’s Run, a small tributary of the North Fork of Licking river near Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Niggermill Run at Salem, EK. B. Williamson, 1900; a -small tributary of the Grand river at Painesville, R. C. Osburn, Igoo. . 48 THE FISHES OF OHIO. Genus: OPSOPGODUS. Key to Species. A. Lateral line complete or very nearly so; dorsal fin with black blotch on anterior rays, usually none on the posterior.— emtlta@. AA, Lateral line always incomplete; dorsal usually with a conspicuous black spot on posterior rays.— megalops. Opsopceodus emiliz Hay. Head about 4%; depth 42; eye 3. D.9; A. 8; scales 5-40-3; teeth 5-5, very slender, strongly hooked, and deeply serrate. Body rather elongate, moderately compressed, not elevated. Head short and slender. Muzzle blunt and rounded. Mouth very small and very oblique, smaller than in any other of our Cyprinidae, with scarcely any lateral cleft. Caudal peduncle long and slender, caudal deeply forked, Breast naked; 16 scales before dorsal. Jateral line complete or very nearly so. Yellowish; sides silvery;. scales above dark edged; usually a dark lateral band from snout to caudal, | above and below which are series of black dots; anterior rays of dorsal dark, no black spot on the posterior rays. Given by Jordan and Evermann (Bull. 47) for Lake Erie ; ‘‘ two small specimens from the St. Mary’s river at St. Mary’s,”’ Karsch,-1893. Opsopceodus megalops (Forbes). Head 434; depth 4 to 5; eye 23. D.7o0r8; A. 7 or 8; scales 5-39-4, 15 before dorsal. Teeth 5-5, hooked and crenate. Lateral line always incom- plete, sometimes on 4 or 5 scales only; sometimes extending with interrup- tions to middle of caudal peduncle. Body slender, fusiform; mouth small, terminal, oblique, so much so in old specimens as to appear almost vertical, the chin projecting beyond mouth, in younger specimens the mouth is less. - oblique. Top of head covered with prickles in old males. Fins large, caudal deeply forked. Breast partly naked. Yellowish brown, sides silvery; scales above dark-edged. Dorsal fin with a black blotch on 4 anterior rays; a second black blotch usually present on 3 posterior rays. Length 2% inches. I have given above the separation of O. emzli@ and O. mega- lops as given by Jordan and Evermann (Bull. 47, U.S. Natl. Mus.) ‘hey suggest in regard to O. megalops that it 1s ‘‘ per- haps not a distinct species.’? A comparative study of these forms confirms this belief. A dozen specimens taken by the writer in the headwaters of the Wabash river at Celina, August, 1899, and two from Summit lake at Akron, July 30, 1900, are referable to O. megalops as given above, but so many variations between CYPRINIDAS. 49 O. emilie and megalops exist among these specimens that it is possible to establish a graduated series between the two species, and none of the characters given in the above separation are found to be constant. The lateral line in some cases ceases in front of the dorsal fin, and in others is continuous to within two or three scales of the caudal. The second dorsal spot is also subject to great variation, for, while in old males it is distinct, in some cases it is very indistinct or wanting altogether. The fin formule and squamation of the breast also vary. Recently, through the kindness of Dr. S. EK. Meek, I have been permitted to examine specimens of O. emzlze from Indian Territory, Arkansas and Illinois, in the Field Columbian Museum at Chicago. These specimens show much the same variation as that given for O. megalops. AsI have had no opportunity to compare with the type specimens, I hesitate to reduce O. megalops to synonymy,, although the two species, as determined by Dr. Meek and myself, undoubtedly intergrade. Genus: ABRAMIS. Abramis crysoleucas (Mitchill). GoLDEN SHINER ; GOLDEN BREAM; ROACH. Head 4%; depth 3. D. 8; A. 13; scales 10-46 to 55-3; teeth 5-5. Body strongly compressed, the belly behind ventrals compressed into a sharp keel, over which the scales do not pass. Color, greenish above, the sides silvery, with bright golden reflections. Length about a foot. The Golden Bream is an abundant resident of the state in suitable localities, being found chiefly in ponds, quiet pools and weedy bayous, apparently more common in the northern part of the state. Given by Rafinesque under the name WVoftemigonus auratus for the Ohio and Miami rivers; recorded by Kirtland under the name ARutulus crysoleucas,; given by Jordan as ‘‘ex- tremely abundant in every pond, lake or bayou’’; Hamilton County, ‘‘common in Bloody Run and Clear creek,’’ Henshall, 1888; Lorain County, ‘‘ very common in still waters,’’ McCor- mick, 1892; Maumee river at Cecil, Grand Rapids, Waterville and Toledo, St. Mary’s river at St. Mary’s and Rockford, Tiffin river at West Unity, Auglaize river at Oakwood and Defiance, Sugar creek and Lost creek at Lima, Blanchard river at Findlay, 50 THE FISHES OF OHIO. Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, Scioto river, Scioto Big Run, Big Walnut creek, Mason’s Run, Big Darby creek, Hell Branch, Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Knox County, Big Jelloway creek, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898; Sandusky Bay, Ashtabula creek at Ashtabnla, Wabash river at Celina, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Niggermill Run at Salem, E. B. Williamson, 1900 ; Chippewa lake, Licking reservoir, R. C. Osburn, 1900. Genus: CLIOLA. Cliola vigilax (Baird and Girard). Head 44%; depth 4%; eye 3%. OD.8; A. 7; scales 8-42-6, about 28 before dorsal; teeth 4-4, with grinding surface and slight hook. Superfici- ally, much resembling Pimephales notatus, but the form is more stout, the mouth more terminal, and the alimentary canal less than twice the length of the body. Caudal peduncle quite deep. Color, greenish, sides pale, darker above, the scales above dark-edged; a dark lateral band ending ina distinct caudal spot; a well defined black spot on anterior rays of dorsal. Length 3 inches. This minnow has, to the best of my knowledge, been recorded from but two localities in the state. It has been taken by Hen- shall in Hamilton County, ‘‘ common in O’ Bannon creek,’’ and a single specimen was taken in Big Walnut creek, Franklin County, by Mr. E. B. Williamson and the writer in 1897. It is probably common nowhere in the state except in the southwestern part, as its range is for the most part farther south and west. = PA CYPRINIDAS. aE Genus: NOTROPIS. Key to Species. A. Teeth 4-4, I, 4-4, 0, or I, 4-4, 1-(sometimes 2 teeth in one or both inner rows in JV. hudsonius and NV. heterodon). B. Scales not very closely imbricated, not notably deéper than long; dorsal in- serted nearly over the ventrals; no black spot on dorsal fin. (on Teeth one-rowed, 4-4 (sometimes 2, 4-4, 2 in JV. heterodon). D. Lateral line usually more or less incomplete; small species, usually with a dusky lateral band. E. Mouth very small, chin pale.— cayuga. EE. Mouth moderate; chin black.— heterodon. DD. Lateral line always complete; small, weak species. F. Fins all small and low, pectorals not reaching ventrals.— blenntius. FF. Fins high, pectorals reaching ventrals.— volucellus. CC. Teeth two-rowed, 1, 4-4, 0; I, 4-4, I; or I, 4-4, 2, the grinding surface more or less developed. G. No distinct dark spot at base of caudal.— shumardt. GG. A distinct dark spot present at base of caudal fin.— hudsontus. BB. Scales deeper than long, closely imbricated along side of body. Usually a dis- tinct black spot on last rays of dorsal.— whipplit. AA. Teeth 2, 4-4, 2 (2, 4-4, 1in JV. jejunus). H. Anal fin short, of 7 to 9 developed rays. if Teeth with the grinding surface developed. Ue Seales closely imbricated along the sides, no dark spot at base of caudal.— cornutus. JJ. Scales not closely imbricated, a dark spot at base of caudal at least in young. K. 13 scales before dorsal fin.— heterodon. KK. 18 scales before dorsal.— hudsontus. Il. Teeth without evident grinding surface, scales not closely imbricated. 1G; Eye very large, 22 in head; teeth 2, 4-4, 2.— ariommus. Pi Eye gs, in head: teeth 2, 4-4, 1.— jJejunus. HH. Anal fin long, of 11 or 12 rays; dorsal inserted behind ventrals. M. Scales not closely imbricated on sides, not crowded anteriorly. N. Eye very large, 2% to 3.—_ arge. NN. Eye smaller, 3¥ to 4. QO. Front of dorsal midway between snout and base of caudal fin; eye 34— atherinoides. OO. Front of dorsal nearer to base of caudalthan to snout; eye 4.— rubrifrvons. MM. Scales small and crowded auteriorly, closely imbricated; a black spot at base of caudal.— unebratilts. Notropis cayuga Meek. Head 4 or a little over; depth 4%; eye 3%. D. 8; A. 8; scales in lateral ‘line about 36, 14 before dorsal; teeth 4-4. Close to WV. heterodon, from which it can be distinguished most readily by the absence of any black on the chin. Lateral line wanting onsome scales. Jawsnearlyequal. A black band along lateral line, continued forward along sides of head and around -snout on upper jaw. Length 2% inches. 52 THE FISHES OF OHIO. First recorded for the state by Kirsch, 1893, ‘‘a few specimens: from the Maumee river at Toledo’*; Franklin County, ‘‘ rare in Big Walnut and Little Darby creeks, common in Mason’s Run,”’ Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Sandusky Bay and Ashtabula creek at Ashtabula, common in both places, R. C. Osburn, 1899. This species seems to have been overlooked or confused with some other species by the earlier investigators, as its occurrence in both the Lake and Ohio river drainage at the points above noted would indicate a pretty general distribution over the state in suitable localities. * Notropis heterodon (Cope). Head 4; depth 4; eye 3, longer than snout. D. 8; A. 8; scales 5-36-3, 13 in front of dorsal. The lateral line incomplete, extending usually about to dorsal fin, but varying greatly; teeth 4-4 (sometimes 2, 4-4, 2). Body moderate; the back slightly elevated. dorsal inserted nearer the snout than base of caudal. Coloration olivaceous, darker on the back; a distinct lateral band, which passes forward through eye and on both jaws; chin distinctly black. Said to be an exceedingly variable species. Taken by the writer in Sandusky Bay, July, 1899, and again in Sandusky Bay at Cedar Point and Black Channel, Igoo. Notropis blennius (Girard). STRAW-COLORED MINNOW. D. 8; A. 8; scales 5-36-4, 14 1n front of dorsal; teeth 4-4. Head 4; depth 4 to 5; eye large, 3in head. Body moderately stout, but little com- pressed. Head rather broad; mouth small, inferior, horizontal. Lateral line complete. Dorsal fin low, its longest ray 34 of head. Coloration, pale or yellowish olive; sometimes with a dark lateral band, and edges of mouth dark. Length 2% inches. An exceedingly variable Minnow. This insignificant looking species occurs widely and abundantly throughout the state and has been recorded by all the recent writers upon the fishes of the state, beginning with Jordan (Ohio. Rept. ), under various names—ZJV. dblenntus, N. deliciosus and LV. stramineus. Hamilton County, ‘‘ abundant in Little Miami river and Clough creek,’’ Henshall, 1888; Lorain County, given as two species, JV. deliciosus, very abundant in all the streams, and NV. stramineus, not common, McCormick, 1892; Maumee river at * Notropis anogenus Forbes and JV. /retensis (Cope), two small species closely re- sembling WV. heferodon and JN. cayuga, respectively, have been taken almost on our borders. in streams flowing into the state. They may be looked for in north-western Ohio. J. anogenus may be known from JV. heterodon by the usually complete lateral line and the included lower jaw. JV. fretensis is separated from JV. cayuga (with which it is perhaps. identical), by the complete lateral line and the presence of 17 scales in front of the dorsal.. CYPRINIDA:, 53 Antwerp, Cecil, Defiance and Waterville, Tiffin river at Bruners- burg, Auglaize river at Cloverdale, Sugar creek at Lima, Blanch- ard river at Ottawa, Beaver creek at Grand Rapids, Kirsch, 1893 ; Franklin County, common in almost every stream, females with eggs, July 16, Williamson and Osburn, 1897 ; Knox County, Big Jelloway creek system, ‘‘abundant, females with ripe eggs on May 25,’ Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898 ; Ice creek at Ironton, John’s creek at Waterloo, Huron river at Milan, San- dusky Bay, Ashtabula creek at Ashtabula, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks near Dayton, North Fork of Licking river at Newark, abundant in most places, R. C. Osburn, 1899 ; Pippin lake, Cuyahoga river at Hawkins, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin river at Willoughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMahon’s Run at Bellaire, Licking reservoir, R. C. Osburn, 1900. Notropis volucellus (Cope). Head 334; depth 4; eye 3%. D. 8; A. 8; scales 4-34-3; teeth 4-4. Fins more elongate than in related species, the pectorals reaching ventrals. Very similar to WV. dlennius, but distinguished especially by the noticeably higher fins. Length 2% inches. The only record I am able to find of the occurrence of this species in Ohio is that given by Kirsch in his ‘‘ Report upon Investigations in the Maumee River System,’ in which he men- tions the fact that specimens from Gordon creek, taken by Prof. S. EH. Meek, are given him as JVotropsis deliciosus var. volucella Cope. Cope’s volucellus is now regarded as a distinct species. Notropis shumardi (Girard). Head 334; depth 44; eye very large, 24% to 3 in head. D. 8; A. 7 or 8; scales 4 or 5-36-2 to 4, 13 in front of dorsal; teeth I, 4-4, 1, with deep grind- ing surface, and the edge strongly crenate. Body compressed, the back elevated; tail slender. Head compressed, flattened above, below and on the sides; snout short, obtuse; mouth very oblique, terminal, lower jaw included. Fins large. Lateral line complete, decurved. Color, olivaceous above, pale below; a dark lateral band, and vertebral line; scales above dark-edged. Length 3 inches. Recorded by Kirsch as JV. doops Gilbert, ‘‘common in the Maumee river at Grand Rapids,’’ and ‘“‘ five specimens from the 54 THE FISHES OF OHIO. Blanchard river at Findlay,’’ 1893. Rare in Big Walnut creek, Franklin County, Williamson and Osburn, 1897; a single speci- men from Stillwater creek near Dayton, R. C. Osburn, 1899. Notropis hudsonius (De Witt Clinton). SpoT-rair—ED MINNOW; SHINER. Head 434; depth 4; eye 3. D. 8; A. 8; scales 5-39-4, 18 before dorsal; teeth I, 4-4, 0 or 1 or 2. Body elongate, considerably compressed in adult. Head short; muzzle blunt, decurved, shorter than the very large eye; mouth moderate, nearly horizontal, jaws sub-equal. Lateral line nearly straight, slightly decurved anteriorly. Coloration very pale, with a broad silvery band along side, this frequently underlaid with a dusky band. A dark spot at base of caudal, most distinct in young. Length 4 to 6 inches. This species is apparently confined to the most northern por- tions of the state, in Lake Erie and its larger tributaries. Lorain County, ‘‘ common in the lake and at the mouth of the rivers,”’ McCormick, 1892 ; ‘‘ very common in the Maumee river at Grand Rapids, a single specimen at Toledo,’’ Kirsch, 1893; Lake Erie near Sandusky, abundant, R. C. Osburn, 1900; Sandusky Bay, Morse and Herbert T. Osborn, 1goo. Notropis whipplii (Girard). SILVER-FIN. Head 4%; depth 4 in adult males, females and young much slenderer; eye 4%. D. 8; A. 8 org; scales 5 or 6-38 to 40-3 or 4; teeth 1, 4-4, 1. Body moderately elongate, compressed, the back and belly about equally arched. Head rather short and deep. Scales closely imbricated (much higher than wide) and of a very regular pattern, about 18 in: front of. dorsal. Color leaden or steel-blue, the sides silvery; a dark vertebral line; a black spot covering the posterior 3 membranes of the dorsal fin, this sometimes very much reduced in young and females, but always present. Breeding males. have the fins tipped with creamy white, and the top of head and dorsal region in front covered with small prickles. Length 4 inches. This elegant little fish is widely distributed throughout the state, and is usually quite common in all suitable localities. Recorded by Kirtland under the name Luxzlus kentukzensis. Given by Jordan in his Ohio Report under the name Audsonzus analostanus, which he here confuses with WV. whipplit. Notropis (Hudsonius) analostanus is an eastern form, possibly not specific- ally distinct from JV. whipplii (see Jordan and Evermann, Bull. 47, U. S. Natl. Mus.) Hamilton County, common in all streams explored, Henshall, 1888 ; Lorain County, all streams examined, CYPRINIDA. 55 but not very common, McCormick, 1892; taken throughout the Maumee river basin in Ohio, except in Gordon creek and the west end of Lake Erie, Kirsch, 1893 ; Franklin County, occurs abund- antly in all the larger streams, females with ripe eggs June 28, Williamson and Osburn, 1897 ; Knox County, Big Jelloway creek and tributaries, not rare, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898 ; Ohio river at Ironton, Huron river at Milan, Sandusky Bay, Ash- tabula creek at Ashtabula, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks near Dayton, North Fork of Licking river at Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899 ; Mahoning river, E. B. William- son, 1900; Cuyahoga river at Hawkins, Chippewa lake, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin riverat Willoughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMahon’s Run at Bellaire, Licking reservoir, R. C. Osburn, 1900. Notropis cornutus (Mitchill). ComMMOoN SHINER ; SILVERSIDES. Head 3% to 4%; depth about 3 (2% to 3%); eye 4-53. D. 8; A.9; scales 6—-41-3 or 4, closely imbricated, 18 or 20 before dorsal; teeth 2, 4-4, 2, with narrow grinding surface. Body varying much with age, in young slender, in adult short, deep and compressed. JLateral line decurved. Color above, dark olive green to steel-blue, sides silvery, with a brassy lateral band; a brassy vertebral line (this color showing only in fresh specimens, sometimes appearing as a dark line when out of water). Fins all plain, rosy tipped in breeding males. Females and young plainer. One of the most variable of our Minnows, varying with age, sex and season. Length about Io inches. One of the most abundant of fishes all over the state. Given by Kirtland as Rutulus compressus and Luxulus chrysocephalus ; by Jordan as Luxulus cornutus. Hamilton County, as Votropis megalops, ‘‘abundant everywhere,’’ Henshall, 1888; Lorain County, ‘‘very common everywhere,’’ McCormick, 1892; Maumee river system, ‘‘every stream,’’ Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, ‘‘taken in every stream, generally abundant, females with eggs on July 6,’’ Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Knox County, taken in every stream of the Big Jelloway creek system, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898 ; Ohio river and Ice creek at Ironton, John’s creek at Waterloo, Huron river at Milan, San- dusky Bay, Ashtabula creek, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks at Dayton, and North Fork of Licking river at 56 THE FISHES OF OHIO. Newark, R:'C. Osburn, 1899; Niggermill Run and Mahoning river, E. B.° Williamson, 1900; Cuyahoga river at Kent and Hawkins, Breakneck creek at Kent, Summit lake, Chippewa lake, Licking reservoir, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin river at Willoughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMahon's creek at Bellaire, R. C. Osburn, rgoo. Notropis ariommus (Cope). Head 33( to 44%; depth 4% to 5. D.8; A. 9; scales 6-39-2, large, 15 before dorsal; teeth 2, 4-4, 2. Body stout, moderately elevated, somewhat compressed. Head heavy, broad above; snout moderate, somewhat decurved; mouth moderate, oblique, jaws equal. Eye very large, 2? in head, much longer than snout, larger than in any other Ohio Cyprinid. Lateral line much decurved. Color olivaceous, scales above dark-edged; sides and below bright silvery. Length 5 inches. Two specimens from the Maumee river at Antwerp, Kirsch, 1893. *Notropis jejunus (Forbes). Head 4; depth 474; eye 3% in head, equal to snout, less than inter- orbital space. D. 8; A. 7; scales 5-37-3; teeth 2, 4-4,1. Body moderately slender; head flattish above; snout blunt and rounded. Dorsal over ven- trals; about 16 scales before dorsal. Color, pale olivaceous above, pale on sides and below, with a broad silvery band overlying a plumbeous shade. Length 3 inches. The range of this species in the state seems to be limited to the Ohio river and the lower portions of its tributaries. Hamil- ton County, ‘‘common in Little Miami river and Bloody Run, Henshall, 1888 ; common in the Ohio river and Ice creek at Ironton and in John’s creek at Waterloo, R. C. Osburn, 1899. Notropis atherinoides Rafinesque. Head 424; depth 5%; eye 34%. D. 8; A. 11; scales 5-38-3, 15 before dorsal; teeth 2, 4-4, 2. Body long and slender, compressed, back not ele- vated. Head blunt, conic, shorter than in related species. Mouth moder- ate, very oblique, upper lip on a level with upper part of pupil. Eye large, rather longer than snout. Fins low, front of dorsal midway between point of snout and base of caudal. Lateral line decurved. Color above clear, translucent olive-green, a yellow, iridescent vertebral line in life, which becomes darker in spirits; sides bright silvery, with sometimes a brassy lateral shade ; breeding males with snout rosy. Length 4 to 6 inches. * Notropts scabriceps, given by Jordan in the Ohio Rept., is confused probably with JV. shumardt. NN. scabriceps has not been noticed outside of the Kanawha river. (See Bull. 47, U. S. Natl. Mus.) CYPRINIDA. 57 An elegant and graceful species, common and widely distrib- uted, found in all larger streams, usually on gravelly or sandy bottom, and in lakes under the same conditions. Recorded for the state by Kirtland as A/znnzlus dinemus. ‘‘ Exceedingly com- mon in Lake Erie, and throughout the state one of the most abundant of minnows,’’ Jordan (Ohio Rept.); Hamilton County, “common in Clough creek,’’ Henshall, 1888; Lorain County, ‘‘very abundant at times,’’ McCormick, 1892 ; Maumee river at Cecil, Grand Rapids and Toledo, St. Joseph river at Edgerton, ‘Tiffin river at Brunersburg, Auglaize river at Wapakoneta and Cloverdale, ‘‘ not common at any of these places,’’ Kirsch, 1893 ; Franklin County, common in all of the larger streams, William- son and Osburn, 1897 ; Knox County, ‘‘abundant in Big Jello- way creek,’’ Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898 ; Ohio river at Ironton, Sandusky Bay, Lake Erie at Sandusky, Ashtabula creek, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater creek at Dayton, North Fork of Licking river at Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899 ; Cuyahoga river at Hawkins, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin river at Willoughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMahon creek at Bellaire, Licking reservoir, R. C. Osburn, I9oo. Notropis arge (Cope). Head 44%; depth 6; eye 23 to3. D. 8; A. 11; scales 5-39-3. Close to. iV. atherinoides, but the eye very large, longer than snout; lateral line nearly straight, head large, the snout not very blunt; mouth large, chin pro- jecting. Color pale-greenish olive; a dark vertebral line; belly and sides pale; a broad, silvery lateral band bounded by a dark line. Length 3% inches. ‘‘Apparently varying into JV. atherinoides, hence of doubtful validity.”’ ; This species has been taken at such points in the state as to indicate a wide distribution, but it is not generally common. Hamilton County, ‘‘common in east fork of Mill creek,’’ Hen- shall, 1888 ; Lorain County, ‘‘in company with JV. atherinoides, but not nearly as common,’’ McCormick, 1892 ; Maumee river at Grand Rapids, St. Joseph river at Edgerton, Tiffin river at Brunersburg, scarce, Kirsch, 1893 ; Cuyahoga river at Hawkins, hare, ik. C, Osburn, June 25, 1900. 58 THE FISHES (OF OHIO. Notropis rubrifrons (Cope). Head 4 to 5’ depth 43 to 5%. D. 8; A. 10; scales 5 or 6-39 or 40-3, I5; to 17 before dorsal (Ohio specimens run a little higher, some having as high as 20 before the dorsal); teeth 2, 4-4, 2. Body moderately elongate, back scarcely elevated, head conic and rather pointed. Eye moderate, usually shorter than snout. Resembling WV. atherinoides, from which it can be readily told, in Ohio specimens at least, by the position of the dorsal fin, which is inserted nearer to base of caudal than to point of snout. Above clear olive, each scale dark-edged; sides and under parts silvery; a narrow, coppery lateral band in life, overlying dark pigment; a narrow vertebral line; a row of black dots on either side of anal fin. Males in spring with head and anterior parts reddish, and sometimes the bases of dorsal, ventral and pectoral fins red. Length 23¢ inches. 4 A common and widely distributed species, found in company with NV. atherinoides, but much more common. Kirsch and McCormick record it under. the name WV. dilectus (Girard), but NV. dilectus, as now restricted, is found farther southwest, so I include these records under WV. vubrifrons. Possibly the two may not be distinct. Given by Jordan as abundant in southern Ohio ; Hamilton County, ‘‘common in east fork of Mill creek,’’ Hen- shall, 1888; Lorain County, ‘‘common in the lake and lower parts of all streams entering it,’ McCormick, 1892; St. Joseph river at Edgerton, Blanchard river at Findlay, Beaver creek at Grand Rapids; ‘‘common at these places,’’ Kirsch; sag; Franklin County, ‘‘all larger streams with JV. atherinotdes, abundant where found,” Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Knox County, Big Jelloway creek and several of its tributaries, occa- sionally observed in large schools over clear, gravelly places in ripples, females with ripe eggs on May 24, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898; Ohio river at Jronton, Huron river at Milan, Sandusky Bay, Lake Erie at Sandusky, Ashtabula creek, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks at Dayton, North Fork of Licking river at Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899 ; Niggermill Run and Mahoning river, E. B. Williamson, 1900; Cuyahoga river at Kent and Hawkins, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin river at Willoughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMahon’s Run at Bellaire, outlet of Licking reservoir, R. ©. Osburn; 1960) CYPRINIDAS. 59 Notropis umbratilis lythrurus (Jordan). REDFIN. D. 7; A. 11; teeth 2, 4-4, 2; scales 9-45-3, crowded anteriorly. Head pointed, about 4 in length; body moderately elongated, compressed, depth 4to 5. Eye 3%. Color bright steel-blue above, pale below. Dorsal fin with a conspicuous black spot at base in front. Breeding males have the lower fins bright red. Females and young paler. Length 3 inches. An exceedingly handsome species, especially during the breeding season. Widely distributed and generally common. Recorded for the state by Kirtland as Semotilus diplema. Jordan gives it under the name Lythrurus diplaemius as ‘‘ abundant throughout the state, especially in the southern part ’’’; Henshall, Kirsch and McCormick record it under the name JW. ardens ; ‘““abundant in all streams examined,’’ in Hamilton County, Henshall, 1888; ‘‘ found at all points explored in Maumee river system in Ohio except Maumee river at Cecil and Toledo, St. Joseph river at Edgerton and St. Mary’s river at Rockford, Kirsch, 1893; Lorain County, ‘‘not very common, Black river and Vermillion river near Klipton,’’ McCormick, 1892; Franklin County, ‘‘all streams but the smallest, abundant,’’ June 15 given as a breeding date, Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Ice creek at Ironton, Huron river at Milan, Ashtabula creek at Ashtabula, - Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks at Dayton, North Fork of Licking river at Newark ; exceedingly abundant in a small tributary of Ashtabula creek, in company with Adbramis crysoleucas, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Niggermill Run at Salem, E. B. Williamson, 1900; Breakneck creek near Kent, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin river at Willoughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMahon creek at Bellaire, R. C. Osburn, Ig00. Genus: ERICYMBA. Ericymba buccata (Cope). SILVERY-JAWED MINNOW. Head 8% to 4; depth 4% to 5; eye 4 to4%. D.8; A. 7; scales 4 or 5- 34-3, about 15 in front of dorsal; teeth 1, 4-4, I or I, 4-4, 0, the inner slender and without grinding surface. Body rather elongate, little compressed, back not elevated. Head long, depressed above, with broad and prominent muzzle. Mouth small, horizontal, sub-inferior, lower jaw the shorter. Interopercle, suborbital and dentary bones containing mucous cavities, 60 THE FISHES OF OHIO. which are visible externally. Color olivaceous above, pale and silvery on sides and below; a dark vertebral line and sometimes an indistinct, dark lateral band. Fins all plain. Length 3 to 5 inches. Distributed throughout the state, a very common species, less abundant in the lake than in the Ohio river drainage. ‘‘ Abund- ant in most streams tributary to the Ohio,’’ Jordan’s Report ; Hamilton County, ‘‘ abundant in Little Miami river and tribu- taries,’’ Henshall, 1888; Lorain County, ‘“‘ taken once in Black river,’’ McCormick, 1892; the Maumee river system in Ohio except at the following places: Maumee river at Cecil, Tiffin river at West Unity and Brunersburg, Auglaize river at Wapa- koneta and Lost creek at Lima, Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, every stream, generally abundant, June 15 given as a breeding date, Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Big Jelloway creek system, Knox County, ‘‘taken in every stream, abundant,” Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898; Ohio river and Ice creek at Ironton, Huron river at Milan, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks at Dayton, North Fork of Licking river at Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Niggermill Run and Mahoning river, E. B. Williamson, 1900; Cuyahoga river at Hawkins, Chippewa lake, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin river at Willoughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMahon’s Run at Bellaire, Licking reservoir, R. C. Osburn, IQOO. Genus: RHINICHTHYS. Key to Species. A. Snout long and prominent, projecting much. beyond the mouth, barbei evident, no distinct, black lateral band.— cataracteé. AA. Snout shorter, little projecting, barbel small, but always present; a distinct, black lateral band.— atronasus. Rhinichthys cataractz (Cuvier and Valenciennes). LONG-NOSED DACE. Head-4; depth 5; eye 2 in snout, 5 in head. D. 8; A. 7; scales small, 14-65-8; teeth 2, 4-4, 2. Resembling 7. atronasus, from which it is dis- tinguished by the longer head, by the prominent overhanging muzzle, much longer than in a/ronasus, by the longer barbels and by the absence of a dis- tinct, dark lateral band. Color dark-brownish olive above, sometimes slightly mottled; paler below; a dark spot on opercle, but no distinct band through eye or along side. Length 5 inches. —— CYPRINIDA. 6r Apparently a rare species in Ohio. Dr. Jordan (Ohio Rept. ) says: ‘‘ It is found in the tributaries of Lake Erie and even in the lake itself. It also occurs in the southeastern part of the state.’’ Since then it has not been noticed by any other collector, and the writer has taken it but once, a single specimen from a small tributary of the Grand river near Painesville, August 2, IgOo. Rhinichthys atronasus (Mitchill). BLACK-NOSED DACE. Head 4; depth 4%; eye 1% in snout, 4% in head. D. 7 or 8; A. 7: scales 10-65-6; teeth 2, 4-4, 2. Body moderately elongate, little compressed. Head moderate, rather broad and flattish above; snout moderate; mouth horizontal, lower jaw included; barbels well marked in all Ohio specimens. examined. Color above dark-yellowish olive, much blotched with black; a black lateral band passing forward through eye to snout; breeding males have the lateral band and the lower fins bright orange or crimson. All color markings less evident in females and young, but the lateral, dark band always present. Distributed over the state and generally common or even abundant in suitable localities. It is essentially a ‘‘ brook ’’ species, being rarely found in larger streams, but swarming in clear, cold spring runs, in company with Chrosomus erythrogaster. Hamilton County, ‘‘ common in all the streams,’’ Henshall, 1888 ; Lorain County, ‘‘Spring brook and Chance creek, not common,”’ McCormick, 1892; Maumee river system, ‘‘several from Lost creek near Cecil, by Prof. Meek, found nowhere else’’ (in Ohio), Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, Grant’s Run and Plum Run, common, Williamson and Osburn, 1897; Knox County, Little Jelloway creek, Parker’s Run, Joe Sapp Run and Shadley Run, tributaries of Big Jelloway creek, common or abundant, May 24 given as a breeding date, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1808 ; Ohio river at Ironton, Huron river at Milan, Wabash river at Celina, Wolf creek at Dayton, North Fork of Licking river at Newark, in all of these cases the species has been taken in small nameless tributaries rather than in the main stream, with the exception of Wolf creek and the Ohio river, R. C. Osburn, 1899 ; Cuyahoga river at Kent and Hawkins, and Breakneck creek near Kent, kK. €. Osburn, 1900. 62 THE FISHES OF OHIO. Genus: HYYBOPSIS. Key to Species. oe Mouth inferior, horizontal, color silvery. B. Teeth one-rowed, 4-4. (Se Eye 3% in head; no plumbeous blotches along lateral line.—hyostomus. CC. Eye very large, 24; an interrupted plumbeous lateral band.—dissimilzs. BB. Teeth two-rowed, I, 4-4, I, or I, 4-4, 0. D. Sides with a dusky lateral band.— amblops. DD. Sides silvery, no lateral band.— stover1anus. AA. Mouth large, nearly terminal; eye small; not silvery.— kentucktensts. Hybopsis hyostomus (Gilbert). Head 4; depth 5%; eye 34%. DD! 6; A. 8; scales in lateral line sey before dorsal. Body and head very slender; snout long, acute, projecting beyond mouth for half its length; mouth short, wide, inferior; barbels long. ‘Color silvery, everywhere dusted with fine, dark specks. Length 2% inches. Very rare in the state, and, as far as my knowledge goes, confined to the Ohio river. Dr. Henshall recorded it first from the Ohio river at Raccoon Island, 1889, and the writer has taken it twice in the Ohio, at Ironton, May 31, 1899, and at Bellaire, August 31, 1900. Hybopsis dissimilis (Kirtland). SPOTTED SHINER. Head 4% . depth 5. D.8; A. 7; teeth 4-4; scales 6-40 to 47-5, about 20 in front of dorsal. Body long and slender, little compressed, with long caudal peduncle. Head long, flattish above; snout somewhat bluntly decurved, a little projecting; mouth small, horizontal, lower jaw included; barbel smaller than in A. amblops; eye about 3 in head, somewhat directed upward. Color above dusky or olivaceous, somewhat mottled; sides silvery, with a bluish lateral band, which is sometimes widened into several blackish blotches. In full coloration, one of the most striking of our Minnows. This species has been taken in a number of localities in Ohio, and in both the lake and Ohio river drainage, but is nowhere com- mon. Recorded by Kirtland for the Mahoning river and Lake Erie near Cleveland; Hamilton County, ‘‘rather common in Little Miami river and O’ Bannon creek,’’ Henshall, 1888 ; Frank- lin County, ‘‘ Big Walnut creek, rare,’’ Williamson and Osburn, 1897 ; Stillwater creek near Dayton, rare, R. C..Osburn, 1899 ; Cuyahoga river at Hawkins, R. C. Osburn, 1g00. CYPRINIDA. 63 Hybopsis amblops (Rafinesque). SILVER CHUB. Head 4; depth 4% to 5; eye 3. D.8; A. 7 or 8; scales 5-38-4, about 14 before dorsal; teeth 1, 4-4, 1. Body rather slender, little compressed, rather heavy anteriorly. Head large, flattened and broad above; mouth subinferior, horizontal; barbel evident. - Lateral line somewhat decurved. Color above clear translucent green, scales dark-edged; sides with a broad, silvery lateral band, overlying dark pigment, which sometimes appears as a dark lateral band; a dark band through eye around snout. Fins all plain. Length about 3 inches. Common or abundant throughout the state, found in nearly all streams, but not taken in lakes. Recorded by Kirtland. Given by Jordan as abundant in tributaries of the Ohio ; Hamil- ton County, ‘‘common in Little Miami river,’’ Henshall, 1888 ; Lorain County, ‘‘common in some of the streams,’’ McCormick, 1892; Maumee river system, ‘‘all the smaller tributaries,’’ Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, common in all but the smallest streams, Williamson and. Osburn, 1897; Big Jelloway creek, Knox County, abundant, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898 ; Ohio river at Ironton, John’s creek at Waterloo, Huron river at Milan, Ashtabula creek at Ashtabula, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks near Dayton, North Fork of Licking Fiver near Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Cuyahoga river at Hawkins, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin river at Wil- loughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river and McMa- hon’s creek at Bellaire, R. C. Osburn, 1900. Hybopsis storerianus (Kirtland). Head 4%; depth 4; eye 3, equal to snout. D. 8; A. 8; scales 5-42-4. Body elongate, somewhat compressed, the back somewhat elevated. Head short, compressed; preorbital bone large and silvery; mouth horizontal, lower jaw included; barbels conspicuous. Lateral line somewhat decurved. Dorsal inserted over ventrals, ventrals not reaching vent, caudal long, deeply forked. The teeth are said to be usually 1, 4-4, 0, but all Ohio specimens examined have the teeth I, 4-4, 1. Translucent greenish above; elsewhere bright silvery, sides with a slight plumbeous lateral band, no caudal spot. Length 5 to Io inches. Apparently not well distributed over the state, though occur- ring in both the Lake Erie and the Ohio river drainage. Lake Erie, Kirtland; ‘‘ abundant in Lake Erie,’’ Jordan; Hamilton 64 CYPRINIDA. County, ‘‘common in Little Miami river and Clough creek,”’ Henshall, 1888; Lorain County, Beaver creek and Lake Erie, McCormick, 1892; Lake Erie near Sandusky, R. C. Osbuaine 1900. Dead ones are frequently thrown upon the beach by the waves at Sandusky ; not noticed in Sandusky Bay. Hybopsis kentukiensis (Rafinesque). HORNY-HEAD; RIVER CHUB; JERKER; INDIAN CHUB. Head 3% to 4; depth 4 to 44%; eye 54%. D.8; A. 7 or. 8; scales 6—-41-5,. about 18 before dorsal; teeth I, 4-4, I or I, 4-4, 0, sometimes 4-4, in all Ohio. specimens examined they are I, 4-4, 1. Body rather robust, little elevated, little compressed. Head large, broadly rounded above; snout conical, blunt- ish; mouth large, nearly terminal; barbel evident. Dorsal inserted slightly behind ventrals. Color dusky or bluish or greenish olive above, sometimes. with brassy luster, pale but not silvery below; sometimes with a clear, grass green lateral band in life; fins all plain, tinged with dull orange. Breeding males have the belly tinged with rosy, and a crimson spot on side of head behind eye, and have the top of the head swollen into a crest which is cov- ered with tubercles. Young with dark caudal spot. Length 6 to g inches. Well distributed over the state and generally common. Re- corded by Kirtland. ‘‘ Every stream in the state of Ohio,”’ Jordan: Hamilton County, “‘Little Miami river,’’ Henshall 1888 ;° Lorain County, ‘“‘ very common in larger streams,” McCormick, 1892; Maumee river system in Ohio, ‘‘ every point in every stream examined,’’ Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, common in larger streams, July 16 given as breeding date, Will- iamson and Osburn, 1897; Big Jelloway creek system, Knox County, abundant, May 23 noted as a breeding date, Parker, Williamson and Osburn, 1898, Ohio river at Ironton. Huron river at Milan, Ashtabula creek at Ashtabula, Wabash river at Celina, Stillwater and Wolf creeks at Dayton, North Fork of Licking River at Newark, R. C. Osburn, 1899; Cuyahoga river at Kent and Hawkins, Grand river at Painesville, Chagrin river at Willoughby, Wheeling creek at Bridgeport, Ohio river at Bellaire, R. C. Osburn, 1900. Genus: ExXOGLOSSUM. Exoglossum maxillingua (Le Sueur). Cumi-LIps; NIGGER CHUB. Head 4; depth 4%. D. 8; A. 7; scales 8-53-5; teeth 1,°4-4, 1.7) Body, rather stout, little compressed. Head broad and flattish above, with tumid cheeks. Mouth peculiar, the mandible being contracted and incurved, its. ANGUILLIDA. 65 outline 3-lobed; this appearance is due to the fact that the dentary bones lie ‘close together, parallel, and are united throughout their length, instead of forming an arch as in all other Cyfrinide ; lower lip represented by a broad, fleshy lobe on either side of the mandible. Color olivaceous, smoky or dark above; a blackish bar behind opercle, and a dusky shade at base of caudal in young. Finsall plain. Length 6 inches. Rare in Ohio. Six specimens were taken by the writer in stillwater creek near Dayton, Aug. 15, 1899. The range of the ‘species is to the eastward. West of the Alleghenies it has here- tofore been known only from the Kanawha river, West Virginia. Order: APODES. S2b-Order- ENCHELYCEPHALI. Family: ANGUILLIDA. Genus: ANGUILLA. Anguilla chrysypa Rafinesque. AMERICAN EEL; FRESHWATER EEL. Body elongate, compressed behind; appearing scaleless, but covered with fine, imbedded scales. Head long, conical, moderately pointed. Dorsal and anal fins confluent with caudal. Color brown, often tinged with yellowish; paler below, the color quite variable. Length 4 or 5 feet. The Eel appears to be nowhere very common in Ohio, but is widely distributed throughout the state, and probably occurs in every lake, reservoir and large stream. Rafinesque mentions its occurrence in the Ohio ‘‘as far as Pittsburg ;’’ Kirtland records it for the Ohio river drainage ; Lake Erie and Ohio river, Hen- shall, 1889 ; Lorain County, ‘‘ occasionally taken in the pounds,”’ MeCormmick, 1892; Matumee river at Defiance, “said to inhabit all waters of the Maumee basin,’” Kirsch, 1893 ; Franklin County, ‘observed in Big Walnut creek, reported by fishermen as ‘‘ not rare,’’ Williamson and Osburn, 1897 ; Pippin lake and Chippewa lake, R. C. Osburn, 1900. I have seen specimens taken in Lick- ing reservoir, Licking river and North Fork of Licking river. According to Kirtland the Eel did not formerly inhabit the Lake Erie drainage, but if not, it has found its way there through the ‘canals. 66 THH FISHES OF OHIO; Order: TSOSEONDNUK. Family: WHIODONTIDA. Genus: HH Iopon. Key to Species. A. Belly in front of ventrals carinated; dorsal with 9 developed rays.— alosoides.. AA. Belly in front of ventrals not carinated; dorsal of 11 or 12 developed rays.—/ergisus. Hiodon alosoides (Rafinesque). Head 4%; depth 3%; eye3%. D.9; A. 32; scales6-56-7. Body-closely compressed, becoming deep in the adult, the ventral edge everywhere carin- ated. Maxillary reaching middle of eye. Caudal peduncle rather stouter than in 47. fergzsus, and the fin not so deeply forked; also, the pectorals are longer and the ventrals shorter than in AH. fergisus. Color bluish, sides. silvery, with golden luster. Length 12 inches. Rare in Ohio, the range of the species being farther to the west. streams (except St. Mary’s river) and nearly all the smaller-ones, Kirsch, 1893; Franklin County, abundant, and of general distribution, William- son and Osburn, 1897; Big Jelloway creek system, common on ripples, Park mar mies tee etic acelcmik 60 TCO S OEM SSE ale ho tae siove dices Ses G slave ve o's 7 ROCCUS Har ah tm anvasutae e sielcrer voee sive 102 MRE 8 hardin a) 0.0 ent eek viet we os 59 Salmonidze 68 DSL 2050 es Me 36 Ga lwelinsee ha me a lee ecco key 70 eee. ey ieee Wega < 97 Scaplichymenusy, asc peibeyss eee oa e eee 19 le iS OS ee a ana pean + Schibeodese man eee wedi wa kee 27 MUPOMLOLIS ee eee eee eee 83 SCUBIGCE SS Scio saw tae © a awlanr ite fuels a 103 Exoglossum.......... 0... ..-e sees seers 64 SEmiOunlus es want rg sets wanatoohasts aie ace 46 Serhanidc a. ace ne aw Shoeer mano oe ns 102 Fundulus... 6.1.0... 1.0. see eee. 73 Siltirclaay pooh sae ee em a Aces sae 22 : StiZOStedtoms sence alas neko tee os 88 (SChies » 2-5 | ya Ganes aie ee oPe at trae 10 Cres SLGLCICO MM, Sele sere hier 2 /le tiers hele, 6 oe a 6 BB a: ee ee ee a A Rin ea ht 42 ARIEEROIEEENS 2 oi. 12), oo.nre esis Lele Fgwew ec wenes gI TRNYOGMOnm, «2 Seah ie ean eee 66 Uinta or retes, anther ee eee ean eta ae 70 EWR Cleteuten eat e os. cattle feo ha soos 66 Win rid cent en save ome orate cial rotsiaee 70 Goa OSTA ILI Sysyeyavat ss, 5;16 eiaierS cusiavene ool 44 . EME eth. ko cit eld ewes hia a ee 62 | ae (il 4 i 4 | ‘ 1} P . BY iy . D = i fee's c a 4 OTS ’ A f 5 a A Tip a i ! _ a oT PIVOTS ALA ad -) i tt very it LAE AS ‘ee = AACE EE) WeRtcet ERAS A On ebAY aha tear ds