Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. CoE Ants Deph diay ih & Ser 4 acd) nan ale m4 mre fs ff EM 22UF United States #2} Department of eA Agriculture Forest Service Northeastern Forest Experiment Station Resource Bulletin NE-127 7 fal = fh Forest Resources of Southern New England Robert T. Brooks David B. Kittredge Carol L. Alerich Abstract Foreword An analytical report that summarizes and discusses information collected by and reported on the third survey of Southern New England forests. Additional information is drawn from the previous forest surveys to identify trends in forest resources. Topics include forest area, species composition, volume, growth, wildlife habitat, and ownership. The third inventory of Southern New England was under the overall direction of John R. Peters, Project Leader of the Forest Inventory and Analysis Unit. Eric H. Wharton assisted in the development and administration of the operating plan. Charles T. Scott was responsible for the design of the inventory and sample selection. David J. Alerich supervised the interpretation of aerial photos and collection of data. He was assisted by Joseph G. Reddan. Numerous individuals served as field staff. David R. Dickson and Carol L. Alerich applied FINSYS (Forest INventory SYStem), a generalized data processing system, to the specific needs of the inventory and produced summary tables for this publication. Thomas W. Birch and Carol L. Alerich were instrumental in assuring that the area estimates were consistent with the two previous inventories. Marie Pennestri was responsible for administrative and secretarial services. The Authors ROBERT T. BROOKS is a research wildlife biologist with the Forest Inventory and Analysis unit of the USDA Forest Service’s Northeastern Forest Experiment Station at Amherst, Massachusetts. DAVID B. KITTREDGE is an extension forester and assistant professor with the Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. CAROL L. ALERICH is a forester with the Forest Inventory and Analysis unit of the Northeastern Forest Experiment Station at Radnor, Pennsylvania. Manuscript received for publication 11 June 1992 Northeastern Forest Experiment Station 5 Radnor Corporate Center, Suite 200 P. O. Box 6775 100 Matsonford Road Radnor, PA 19087-4585 February 1993 FlicghliQhtSinccnctecetssere nieces neatsiste dues ececpertmans toe te ctdiebwstede s+ ssisulvacee se Sedoeves ii MMENGEUGEOMe ae stttr: eee eee rete «tadeidecttere. cdstiadrecenevissabccersevectectseccssseveese 1 Discussion FONEStC and Anedare, sa ciarnceseeecr rer ae ckaees deceiies Scbanetst socsveteovnsonrseerer ese 1 IMBEKIANGEALGd ete cucaszcnscnececsctcss son seicimccaecpancicodenesmscmpiassineseasinsiaa sens 5 NUMBPEOKZOUMINCE Gece teen crceraner ence cite onc stneweiedanmeesctorsmecwchaeseanneaas 10 mimber Volume; Biomass, and’ Valueiie. sistent tects teicectecesswccesasevscecaes 18 FORGSEAVVIUGING Til ADIGALT tne ettos eee sae eehts cbse ds ashe teesintdepcoreseveccewerseoevscees 35 QVOMENSINIDeeccee ecetce cont ces acee oases cewac nna weet tedacwesinuseneweate diebecctventenedes 43 Management OppontuniticStsc2c.cn-cesenc athe deck eoeuedoeaccosross vovcescesencs sss 49 Future of Forest Resources of Southern New England....................4. 49 COMGIUSTON rs sooo ene cee ae ete a NEG» Sollee se oWttdcsdtnasbeedieVessnsecessssasececeas 52 PIGSFINULIONNS) Of) IONINYS cts oictsiea isis ale siaisicfeisige cain oloseialnis csislo sctawneieibinilvie sola Sawiot'sletwle wales oneia'sseic 52 Literature i Cited sates oaecnaest dele. cereus oo stecnaniadaihieceticesismtotincteaatoeasnvesececsecseress 59 Tree and Shrub Species of Southern New England...................cceceeeeeeees 63 Sampling Errors for Selected Estimates.................ccccccececceseeeeeescueeueeees 66 PISGIOMMADIOS saranncer oe sca costs ce kos atinicescias ot cobiveten bad shinedes tbeseseourrcactecucssvaxs 68 Cross Reference of Southern New England ANG SLALOHRESOUNCE: MablGS soy ars wie cci cite toa des ok sata weacecatececescecscsvccsedess 70 Highlights Forest Land Area Southern New England, with an estimated 5.5 million acres of forest land, is 62 percent forested. Forest area has changed little in the 30 years since the first extensive forest survey. Timberland Area Timberland, previously termed commercial forest land, accounts for 93 percent of all forest land. Hardwood forest-type groups predominate in Southern New England; two-fifths of the timberland acreage is classified as oak/hickory. Nearly 60 percent of the Southern New England timberland area is classified as sawtimber-size stands. ~ Number of Trees There are more than 500 live trees 1.0 inches d.b.h. and larger on the average acre of timberland. Red maple is by far the predominant tree species in the Southern New England forest, accounting for one of every four trees. Timber Volume, Biomass, and Value Red maple has become the predominant species in regional growing-stock volume, pushing eastern white pine, the previous number one species, to second place. While net change in growing-stock volume is similar to that of the previous survey, the principal component of change has become accretion on existing trees versus ingrowth of new trees. Board-foot volume increased by 50 percent from the 1972 survey to 20 billion board feet. Eastern white pine remains the number one species of board-foot volume, but red maple eclipsed northern red oak for second place. There are nearly 500 million green tons of tree biomass in Southern New England forests, more than 40 percent in nongrowing-stock timber. Across all of New England, timber stands appreciated in value by an average of 4.2 percent between the last two forest surveys; the average rate of vaiue change of all trees appreciated by 3.2 percent. Forest Wildlife Habitat There are more than 12,000 seedlings, saplings, and shrubs on the average acre of Southern New England timberland. More than 116 species of trees, shrubs, and vines were tallied on Southern New England timberland; blueberry is the most important species based on density and frequency. Oaks account for nearly 75 percent of all mast-producing trees in Southern New England. There are nearly 95 million standing-dead trees in Southern New England, 25 percent of which have an observed cavity; only 7 percent of live trees have an observable cavity. roan al OLY inst sets Introduction Discussion The three Southern New England states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut), are commonly perceived as constituting the highly urbanized northern terminus of the Boston to Washington corridor. While densely populated, averaging some 712 individuals per square mile in 1980, the region has significant acreage of rural lands, much of which is forested. In 1985, the third forest survey of the region estimated that there are 5.5 million acres of forest land in Southern New England, representing 62 percent of the total land area (Table 1). This is a slight but nonsignificant increase in forest area since the previous forest survey in 1972. This rural land base provides considerable resources to the people and economy of the region, including wood products, recreational opportunities, wildlife habitat, water, visual amenities, and employment (Millar 1984; More 1985). The landscape matrix of forest land interspersed with agricultural and residential lands gives New England its unique character. The forest lands of Southern New England have been surveyed three times by the USDA Forest Service’s Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) until, initially in 1953, again in 1972, and most recently in 1984. The survey is extensive and sample-based. Samples include both remeasurements of ground plots established in previous surveys, and the establishment of new ground plots. Estimates of resource information are made at the county level of resolution and higher. Information at this resolution is most appropriately used for assessing of conditions and trends of dominant resources at broad scales. The survey cannot adequately answer forest resource questions at scales smaller than counties or for lesser common resources or resource conditions. Each survey has expanded on the previous one. At the most recent occasion, survey data were collected and reported on timber and wildlife habitat resources, forest ownership patterns, forest biomass, and the region’s forest industry. Information is organized differently in this report than in the state reports. A table is provided that cross references resource tables in this and the state reports. This publication draws from these reports and from previous survey reports to describe the forest resources of Southern New England and to discuss issues concerning the management and use of the forest. The three Southern New England states are similar both in forest resources and the issues and opportunities regarding their use. Questions not answered by this report or by the material referenced by this work, or questions concerning survey procedures, should be directed to the Forest Inventory and Analysis unit, USDA Forest Service, 5 Radnor Corporate Center, Suite 200, 100 Matsonford Road, P.O. Box 6775, Radnor, PA 19087-4585; phone (215) 975-4075. Forest Land Area Southern New England has been predominantly forested throughout most of its history. Prior to the arrival of European colonists, Southern New England was principally forested land, interspersed with wetlands and small-scale agriculture (Atwood 1970; Cronon 1983). The colonial period was one of conversion of forest land to agricultural use, with the change occurring later in the north and west of Southern New England. The period between the peysijqnd jou onsNe}s (9;qe}!eAe JOU) B/u, (QZZ61 82261) Siemog pue siojeg pue (9/61) SIeEMOg pue UOSyDIG WOJ4, (ZS61) UosnB1e4 pue pjomsuy pue “(7G61) aINDoyW pue uosnBe4 “(9G61) PaeMoH pue uosNBie4 Wwoly, (28861 ‘886 ‘8SS6L) e2;yOW) pue UOSy21Ig WOl4, S'008’8 tsZz9 SLLL’E 9°L00'S Bele puey (e301 6 vve'e €°0L7 eo 6e'L y78L'L pus] }Ses0jUOU [BIO] 6°SZ8'e oC Cue 7° 290'L S9LS'L 40M10 L°66 Le Sey “gs einsed 6 6LY Gee ecst Cvs puejdolg :ses0JUORY ZLL'S ELLe'S LSSb’'sS 8’ yOr L£S78'L oSte’e Pue] 3S010} [BIOL os LELz 8 vOr Lee b'8p 6° S6zZ JBl9JOULUODUOU [BIO | Bju L°SL Bju eju eju eju uogejueyd 9023 seugsuys eju 7e/u g°99 cv eoL o?csS ueqin Zt BL cf o0sl S02 oLt S trl sanonpoiduy, ee 8°8cL LOEL v8 6°0c vy LOL P98AJOSO1 BAQINPOId 238010} jeBloJOWIUODUORY z99'S 9°866'b b°8L0°S CUiLe ELLL't b°676'7 puepequily ee SE ee ee ee Se ee eee ee eee e€sé6l cL6L S86L puejs] epoyy jnoQoeUUDD snesnysesseyy pue} $918} IV (se19e8 yo spuesnou} uj) cCL6L Pue 2ES61L *puejbuZ MeN WeY{NOS ‘Bole pue] }se10j paysiqnd pue ‘ GEE, ‘pue|BuZ MeN WeYINOS ‘s}e}s pue ssejo puej Aq Bose puey = “|, OjqeyL Revolutionary and Civil Wars found the region’s forest lands to be at an ebb in area, accounting for as little as 25 percent of the total land area (Cronon 1983). Following the Civil War and the opening of the public lands of the west, the abandonment of farm land and its reversion to forest was common. This was to continue through World War II and the surge in urbanization of the Northeast. In 1953, the initial forest survey of Southern New England reported 5.7 million acres of forest land (Table 1). Forest land is specifically defined by FIA (see Definition of Terms) for application of the forest survey. In general terms, forest land is all land, one acre and larger in size, that supports a specified minimum number of trees or more and functions as a natural system or is maintained as a forestry plantation. In the 30 years since the initial survey, forest land area has changed relatively little, declining to 5.2 million acres in 1972 from 5.7 million acres and then increasing slightly to the current 5.5 million acres (Table 1). One part of the increase in forest land area from the 1972 survey is due to a change in survey procedures. In 1972, Dukes and Nantucket Counties in Massachusetts were administratively defined as being entirely nonforest land, in the 1985 survey, these counties were surveyed the same as all other land. If one also considers the sampling errors on each estimate, it is likely there has been no significant change in forest land area between the last two surveys. The major conclusion to be drawn from these numbers is that forest land area has been relatively stable over the last three decades, and that major changes in forest resources have been those of change within the forest (e.g, maturation, fragmentation of ownerships) rather than change between forest land and alternate land uses. It is of interest that over this period, cropland resources have declined dramatically, from a high of 1.2 million acres in 1950 to the current 519,000 acres (Table 2). Both harvested croplands and pastured lands have experienced this decline. It is likely that a large amount of this previously farmed acreage currently is in residential or other developed land uses. Since 1950, the population of Southern New England has increased some 38 percent to estimated 10.3 million people in 1990 (Table 3). The rural population has been increasing at a similar rate, but since lands classified as rural have declined in acreage, rural population density has increased some 51 percent since 1950 to 183 individuals per square mile in 1980 (US. Dep. Commer. Bureau of Census 1987). Some of the most densely populated states in the country are in Southern New England, yet the region remains heavily forested. The impact of this increase in rural populations on forest resources is discussed in detail in the section on forest ownership patterns. As part of the most recent forest survey, landscape patterns were characterized by sampling the interspersion of different land cover types (Brooks and Sykes 1984). As the interspersion of land uses increases, the landscape becomes more complex. Depending on the land uses involved, increasing complexity in a landscape dominated by forests can be associated with increasing fragmentation of forest land. Landscape pattern data are reported as "edge hits" per 1,000 acres. An "edge" is defined as the juxtaposition of two visually different land cover types or the occurrence of a linear land use (for example, hedgerow, or right-of-way). An edge hit occurs when an edge is detected on an aerial photograph with a sampling template. Table 2. Cropland area by cropland type, Census year, and state, Southern New England’ (In thousands of acres) Census year Massachusetts Connecticut Rhode Island All states Harvested cropland 1950 376.0 308.5 39.8 724.3 1964 234.4 205.9 28.9 469.2 1974 188.0 159.2 21.4 368.6 1982 197.8 171.2 21.3 390.3 Pastured cropland 1950 151.0 128.5 25.5 305.5 1964 79.9 56.3 12.1 148.3 1974 55.5 56.0 5.3 116.8 1982 51.7 42.8 4.6 99.1 Total cropland? 1950 624.4 498.0 80.3 1,202.7 1964 347.8 288.0 45.2 681.0 1974 257.0 227.0 29.1 513.1 1982 265.9 225.0 28.2 519.1 ‘Data from the Census of Agriculture, U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census Includes Other cropland area Table 3. Total and rural human population by Census year and state, Southern New England’ (In thousands of individuals) Census year Massachusetts Connecticut Rhode Island All states Total population 1950 4,690.5 2,007.3 791.9 7,489.7 1960 5,148.6 2,535.2 859.5 8,543.3 1970 5,689.2 3,032.2 949.7 9,671.1 1980 5,737.0 3,107.6 947.2 9,791.8 1990 6,016.4 3,287.1 1,003.5 10,307.0 Rural population?* 1950 731.3 448.6 124.7 1,304.6 1960 846.0 549.7 116.6 1,512.3 1970 878.7 655.6 121.8 1,656.1 1980 928.7 657.8 123.2 1,709.7 ‘Data from Census of Population, U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census Rural population is defined for the 1980 Census as all persons living outside urbanized areas and outside places of 2500 or more inhabitants outside urbanized areas 3Rural population data for 1990 not available at this time The results of this survey show forest land to be highly interspersed with cultural lands (that is, lands with human development as the major land cover) (Table 4). Forest-cultural juxtaposition is the major edge type in Southern New England after transportation right-of-ways. As expected, the juxtaposition of forest and cultural land covers increases in the more urbanized counties (Dickson and McAfee 1988a, 1988b, 1988c). In northern New England, land use patterns are less complex, total "edge hits" accounting for less than half of the values for Southern New England (for example, Brooks et al. 1986). It will be interesting to follow this statistic in future surveys as a measure of single family-residential development in historically rural counties. While the construction of a house on a 10-acre forested lot may remove little forest land, it does influence the use of the remaining adjacent forest land for commercial forest, for wildlife habitat, and for wildland recreation. Timberland Area Timberland is a subset of all forest land, defined as being capable of growing at least 20 cubic feet of wood per acre per year and not being administratively withdrawn from timber utilization. The third Southern New England forest survey classed 93 percent of the region’s forest land as timberland, some 5.1 million acres (Table 1). This is an insignificant increase in absolute timberland area from the previous survey and a slight decrease in the percentage of timberland as a component of total forest land. This change in status from timberland to noncommercial forest land is due to a slight increase in reserved timberland (forest land set aside or withdrawn from timber utilization by statute or designation) and a larger increase in unproductive forest land. While these changes in timberland and noncommercial forest land area since 1972 are interesting, we are unable to identify any significant change in area over this period. The sampling error associated with each estimate precludes identification of significant differences unless the difference exceeds the combined error of the two estimates. Sampling errors are calculated for each estimated statistic. It is impractical to report all of these numbers. Sampling errors for a few estimates are given (see Sampling Errors for Selected Estimates) and the balance is available upon request from the FIA unit, Radnor, Pennsylvania. As an example of how a change is determined to be insignificant when considering sampling error, we can look at the change in timberland area in Southern New England between surveys. In 1972, timberland area was estimated to be 4,998,600 acres, + 1.3 percent (see Table 1 and Sampling Errors for Selected Estimates), or 65,000 acres. In 1985, timberland area was estimated to have increased to 5,078,400 acres, + 0.9 percent, or 45,700 acres. This means that if there are no errors in the procedure and we repeated these surveys in the same way, the odds are 19 to 1 (significant at the 95-percent probability level) that the 1972 estimate of timberland area would be between 4,933,600 and 5,063,600 acres, and the 1985 estimate would be between 5,032,700 and 5,124,100 acres. The 95-percent confidence intervals on the two estimates overlap and we are unable to say there has in fact been a significant increase in Southern New England timberland area from 1972 to 1985. Table 4. Index to land-use interspersion by type of land use or land cover and state, Southern New England, 1985 (In edge hits’ per thousand acres) Land use/cover Massachusetts Connecticut Rhode Island All states” Forest - forest 9.6 10.6 8.6 9.9 shrub 4.4 4.3 2.2 4.2 agricultural/ herbaceous 8.8 10.6 4.1 9.1 cultural 12.3 13.5 10.1 12.6 Shrub - agricultural/ herbaceous 0.9 1.7 0.6 1.2 cultural 0.7 1.1 0.6 0.8 Agricultural/ herbaceous - cultural 1.5 3.1 1.3 2.1 Hedgerow 2.3 3.0 1.6 2.5 Transportation right-of-way 15.3 17.0 13.8 15.8 Utility 7 right-of-way 3.3 Zan 1.6 2.7 Aquatic 6.1 10.6 11.2 8.1 All edge classes 65.2 77.5 55.6 68.8 "Brooks and Sykes (1980) ?Averaged state values weighted by total state area While timberland area at the regional level appears to have increased slightly, this trend is not consistent across the states. Both Connecticut and Rhode Island have shown a nonsignificant decrease in timberland area from 1972 to 1985 (Dickson and McAfee 1988a, 1988b). Rhode Island timberland area decreased in every county, but the total timberland area in the state is less than 400,000 acres, and statements about county-level change are unreliable due to excessive sampling error. In Connecticut, timberland area increased slightly in the less urbanized three eastern counties and decreased consistently in the more urbanized five western counties. While these changes are Statistically nonsignificant, their consistency lends them credence. Massachusetts’ timberland area, on the other hand, is estimated to have increased some 179,000 acres between 1972 and 1985 (Dickson and McAfee 1988c). When considering the sampling error on both estimates, this change is nonsignificant. Berkshire and the Pioneer Valley counties in the west all show an increase in timberland area while Worcester and the eastern counties are mixed, with changes of only several thousand acres each. The only general conclusion one can draw from these statistics is that, both regionally and locally, timberland area has remained stable between 1972 and 1985. In the years since the last forest survey, it is possible that timberland area may have declined. The number of housing starts has increased from 41,000 in 1983 to 75,000 in 1986 in Southern New England (U.S. Dep. Commer. Bur. Census 1987). In Connecticut, the population density of the 10 towns with the largest increase in housing units between 1980 and 1989 (10-town average increase of 39.6 percent versus a 14.1-percent increase statewide) averaged only 271 people per square mile, much less than the statewide average of 664 (Connecticut Dep. of Econ. Dev. 1990). Massachusetts Audubon reports, based on a town-by-town survey of building permits, that between 1981 and 1986, 112,000 acres of Massachusetts "open space” were affected by development (Greenbaum and O’Donnell 1987). In 1986 alone, more than 30,000 acres in Massachusetts were developed. While it is not reported how much of this open space was forest land, these figures serve as an important index of the degree of development in Southern New England. This development has occurred in traditionally rural, extensively forested counties as well as in predominantly urbanized counties. In Connecticut, over the decade of the 1980’s, housing units increased by 14.1 percent (Connecticut Dep. of Econ. Dev. 1990). For the 10 Connecticut towns with the lowest population density, that is, rural towns, the median increase in housing units was 21 percent for the decade and 8.2 percent for the 10 towns with the highest population density (urban towns). While each home in a rural, forested setting may remove only a small area of forest, cumulatively this development activity will reduce forest area. More important, the subdivision of forest land alters management and utilization options and the general character of forest land and landscapes. Classification of timberland by type and stand size is made by considering of the stocking of either species (forest type) or diameter classes (stand size). Forest-type groups and stand-size classes are described by the species or diameter classes that constitute the plurality of stocking. Accurate changes in type and stand size from previous surveys can be made only between 1972 and 1985 due to changes in classification standards and algorithms. At the time of the prior forest survey (1972), the predominant forest-type groups in Southern New England were the oak/hickory, northern hardwoods, and white/red pine groups (Table 5). These forest-type groups were again predominant in the 1985 forest survey (Table 6). These types account for 4.2 million timberland acres or 83 percent of the total. No significant change in the distribution of timberland area by forest type has been detected for 1972 to 1985 in Southern New England. While there is not necessarily a perfect correlation between tree age and diameter, stand-size class generally is indicative of stand-age class. This is especially likely in Southern New England where much of today’s forest reverted following agricultural abandonment, resulting in the establishment of an even-aged forest. In 1985, sawtimber-size stands account for a majority of Southern New England timberland (Fig. 1). Sawtimber-size stands increased by 1.1 million acres between 1972 and 1985, a significant increase between surveys. Over the same period, both poletimber- and sapling and seedling-size stands decreased significantly by 325,000 and 588,000 acres respectively. The 1985 forest survey reported that sapling and seedling-size stands account for only 8 percent of forest land or slightly more than 400,000 acres of a total forest area of 5 million acres. Stand-size class i a Z mt He | bi : ll : SS (EI TT ca 1,000 2,000 Thousands of acres Figure 1.--Area of timberland by stand-size class, Southern New England, 1972 and 1985. The skewed distribution of timberland by stand-size class affects to some extent the future potential flow of wood products. As is shown in the discussion of numbers of trees and tree volume by diameter, the skewed distribution of forest area by stand size is a result of the skewed distribution of trees by diameter. Without a more balanced distribution of size classes for stands or trees, harvest yields will follow a boom and bust cycle rather than a sustained, even flow. Table 5. Area of timberland by forest-type group and stand-size class, Southern New England, 1972 (In thousands of acres) Stand-size class Forest-type group All Sapling and classes Sawtimber Poletimber seedling Nonstocked White/red pine 616.9 208.8 119-5 .O 945.1 Spruce/fir 28.2 .O 15.8 .O 43.9 Hard pine 28.6 56.0 49.8 .O 134.4 Oak/pine 94.8 UP /Avee 78.5 .O 344.6 Oak/hickory 767.6 TOTES 352.0 .O 2,191.2 Elm/ash/red maple 6.1 77.5 101.2 .O 184.8 Northern hardwoods 361.4 453.2 260.3 0 1,074.9 Aspen/birch .O 13.8 21.0 0 34.8 All groups 1,903.6 2,052.1 998.1 .O 4,953.8 Table 6. Area of timberland by forest-type group and stand-size class, Southern New England, 1985 (In thousands of acres) Stand-size class Forest-type group All Sapling and classes Sawtimber Poletimber seedling Nonstocked White/red pine 800.6 115.3 42.4 .O 958.3 Spruce/fir 6.7 35.7 9.1 0 S25 Hard pine 43.4 67.9 3202 .O 143.5 Oak/pine 204.0 124.3 6.2 .O 334.6 Oak/hickory 1,050.9 911.3 177.4 0 2139-6 Elm/ash/red maple 132.2 81.4 63.9 .O 277.6 Northern hardwoods 687.2 363.1 72.5 9.9 1.13236 Aspen/birch 6.5 28.0 6.2 .0 40.7 All groups 2,931.4 e270 410.1 9.9 5,078.4 The predominance of a single size class, in this case sawtimber, determines in part the wildlife community in Southern New England forests. DeGraaf and Rudis (1986) classified New England wildlife by habitat use and identified the many species of herptofauna, birds, and mammals that use or prefer the younger sapling and seedling-sized forest stands. As these stands mature into poletimber size and are inadequately replaced by regeneration harvests of mature stands, wildlife species that are obligate residents of early successional stands become increasingly rare, e. g., American woodcock (Scolopax minor), rufous-sided towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus), eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) and New England cottontail (S. transitionalis). Stocking is a means of evaluating stand density by comparing the sample stand to a standard of "normal" or "full" stocking (Smith 1986). Stocking is a matter of concern as it directly influences many other forest environment processes including timber growth and yield. As calculated by FIA, stocking is the degree of occupancy of land by trees, measured either in basal area and/or in the number of trees in a stand. These measurements are compared to a standard of 75 square feet of basal area per acre for trees 5.0 inches or larger in diameter at breast height (d.b.h.), or its equivalent in number of trees per acre for seedlings and saplings (that is, trees less than 5.0 inches d.b.h.). Southern New England forests have become increasingly overstocked (Fig. 2). In 1985, it is estimated that 46 percent of timberland is overstocked, and 79 percent of timberland is either fully stocked or overstocked (Table 7). This is a significant change from the 1972 survey, with a decrease in fully stocked stands and a comparable increase in overstocked stands. Trees in fully stocked to overstocked forest stands are growing at less than their potential due to competition between trees for growing space (light, nutrients, and moisture). The vigor of individual trees is lessened due to the stress of competition and the trees are more susceptible to insect and disease infestations, resulting in mortality. Overstory mast production is reduced in overstocked stands due to reduced individual tree-crown size. Understory growth and shrub fruiting, important components of wildlife habitat, are suppressed due to a fully closed crown canopy. Number of Trees The total number of live trees in Southern New England forests declined some 13 percent between 1972 and 1985 (Tables 8-9). The decline was in the smaller diameter classes: the seedlings, saplings, and smallest poletimber size trees (Fig. 3). The change in the diameter distribution of Southern New England trees reflects the maturation of the forest. Sapling-size trees are only 80 percent as numerous in 1985 as in 1972. This decline in numbers continues through the 6-inch diameter class, the smallest poletimber-size class. Trees 7 inches d.b.h. and larger are more numerous currently than a decade ago. The greatest increase, 30 percent from the prior survey, is in small sawlog-size (11.0 to 14.9 inches) trees. The principal effect of this increase is discussed in the section on changes in board-foot volume. The ubiquitous red maple was the most common tree species in Southern New England in 1985 (Table 9). Its estimated 692 million stems 1.0-inch d.b.h. and 10 Stocking class Moderately stocked Fully stocked 1,000 2,000 Thousands of acres Figure 2.--Area of timberland by all-live stocking class, Southern New England, 1972 and 1985. larger account for every fourth tree in the region. White pine and eastern hemlock are the second and third most common species, due mostly to their wide distribution in Massachusetts (Dickson and McAfee 1988c). As a group, the oaks and hickories are common; this is reflected in the predominance of the oak/hickory forest-type group (Table 6). These same species and species groups were equally common at the prior survey (Fig. 4). Changes in species numbers probably are non-significant. Growing-stock trees accounted for 79 percent of all trees and 87 percent of all-live trees in Southern New England in 1985 (Fig. 5). As with all-live trees, red maple is the predominant species of growing-stock trees, followed by northern red oak and white pine. Rough- and rotten-cull trees make up 12 percent of all trees and red maple is again the most common tree in this class (Fig. 6). Noncommercial hardwoods (for example, boxelder, gray birch, and hawthorn) as a group are a major component of these trees as they are by definition considered rough cull. Generally, the proportion of cull trees by species follows the distribution of the species in the general population. An exception is American beech, for which a higher proportion was classified as cull than would be expected. Beech bark disease, a disease complex caused by beech scale (Cryptococcus fagisuga) infestation followed by a Nectria fungus invasion, was epidemic in Southern New England prior to the last survey. This disease causes significant beech defect and mortality (Burns and Houston 1987). 11 535355 sn a et v8L0'S s'Ese'b “ize 9°z6e ELLL'L = |" SO8"L e6z6'% = L'0SL'Z SOSSEIO II'y a ee ee 6eze’'r Geel 890l S28 L'LZZ 6 LOE O'96h'L 1L'SzE Pe4903s18A9 €°469'L 0'£09'Z SOLL s‘LEez z°689 O'9€0'L 9°Ze8 s'See'l pexoo3s Ayn4 Z'6L8 S‘zvs “is £09 8° L9Z £0Se LSLp 6 Ley pexo03s Aje}es0pow L"szz S'eel Lz esl €°S6 els LOZ z'8s pexoois Ayoog 66 ox) 00 0'0 66 0'0 0'0 0'0 pexoojsuoyy a S86 ZZ6L S86L ZLEL Ssél ZL6L S86L ZL6L ssejo —— Bunjo01s S9le}s IV pueyjs} epoyy ynojoeuu0D snesnyoesseyy 8 (Sei98 yo spuesnoy} u}) S861 Pue 7261 ‘puejbuzZ MeN WoYINoS ‘e}e3s pue ssejo Buly90}s 002) aAr-jJe Aq puepequn jo Baly “7 e1qe] 12 MIllions of trees 4,400 12972 1,300 1985 sof twoods 4,200 ee) ee 4,100 1,000 900 goo Midpoint. two-inch diameter class Figure 3.--Number of all-live trees on timberland by diameter class and species group, Southern New England, 1972 and 1985. Species/species group E. white pine Eastern hemlock Black birch Sugar maple White aah Yellow birch 100 150 Millions of trees Figure 4.--Number of all-live trees on timberland by principal species or species group, Southern New England, 1972 and 1985. 13 ELL'E€ vz38'L9 LEZ*LZL LOO'SLZ 887'TLE 088'8€9 89S'8ES'L seeds IV 769'E7 Ovz'6r vrl’Sé6 OO6'LZL t78'867 80S'0€S €ZO'sLe'l Spoompiey iV v yee t6C'L v67'7 COL'EL 6LS'S9 €S6'SLE SPOOMPJByY BIBWILWOSUON L8Z vOL'L Ovo'z SZG6'E OLO’LL TEC‘ LL LSZ've Spoompiey jeldJBUWILW0S 4J84IO Ofc 6SE 000'L €v7'l €8l't tv8'b 92001 uuj3 96¢'7 806'8 679'CL e6p'ZL €£9'E7S 78S'‘0€ OSE’6r S80 pol 19410 826'v SSv’'6 brs'LL 6y9'LZ O€6'97 662'0€ 766'LS 80 pe: WeyvON 4997 vSZ'b Lee's bre'sL bye’sz Le6'Lb 796'E8 BO OUAA 802 68e'L 9962 6E8'S 860'SL 9Z1'97 vLL’es Assays 9b) ELe L6v 9S0'L v6E'e L£S1’S v9r’s SLL‘07 uedsy LLZ'h LEL'7 808’¢ 9ze'S €Se’6 4se‘eL SZL'Ov yse ou ¢é8 vos't LZS‘Z 66L'E 6E6'b 6LL’OL LOoz’ce yoe0qg €cL O16’ ZE7'E v6S'9 vEl’L OLe’eL ecL‘Le A10>91H 6EEe 8LO'L €16'7 069’ S6Pr’OL vLo'vL 66S'772 youig sedeg 6S8 tSb'e 9LL’S cSc'LL 97z'9L O8l ‘vz 0020'S YosIq JBOMS (74°) 9S0'L Ssv'e L8Z'S L9v’OL 6SS'EL €Ls’ee Ydsiq MOjjeA OLS'L Lyi’e €SL’s SL8’6 9SO’EL 688'97 ese’Ls ejdew se6ns LZ8’€ S9L‘OL LLZ'€Z 79OP'ES 6Ee'ZOL 9cs'7sL LLE’90r ejdew pey L80’OL vss'sl L8p'Le LOL’9P S9v'EL 7LE’80L bysS'0cZ SPOOMYOS jI'V Ove PLE 8LS LLY sss'z 7L0°8 906’Z1 SPOOMJOS 10419 8Z6'L +¥06'S OLL’L €68'0L CCL'ET Lse’Se €90’¢9 yoojwer 940'9 9138'6 Ove’sl 89L'E7 SZO'CE £SS‘0S L9e'vLh ould atu 64S vLL'L €vs'c ZLL'S LLL'6 8LL'9 686'61 auld Yyo3id Le9 S9L vss'z 9L0'E Ot2'Z 6vS'L LL9°Z auld poy OLS LLO ez6'L Lvs’z LLL’€ 880'9 809'Z 4ysaonids 6vL 6cl 6°OL 68 69 6v [4 -OEL -OLL -0'6 OL -0°S -O'€ “Ol sai9eds QyBiey yseesg ye sayoul) ssejo soJOWeIG (S901] Jo Spuesnoy} uj) ZL6L ‘puejbuyZ men UJeYINOS ‘ssejo JeJQWeIp pue seloeds Aq puepequin UO S9_l} BAI JO JBQqUINNY “g 2IGEL 14 9LL'ZEO'E Ses vLl'b €0E'b LLS'6 LZO'LL €0r'LLS'Z L6z 7087 €9L'2 O6€'9 LGGabit LLO0'66€ O O O el O 608'LL Of Lol 6S L6L 90P 009'07 0) L? 0 0 bY 966'0SL ce Lee 9LPD 9SL'L €lo'z OL6'691L v8 v69 cS6 ctrl’ Lpe’e €0S'06L ZL OE? SSc OLL v6S L8b'SOL 0) 6L 0 66 LoL LSO'6E O O 0 LS 6EL s9e'L£Z O oy aa 6S cO0c BLY L62'LS O L6 c8 Stl vLY per ld O ech Lvl LO? €LZ2 €28'SS O O Le 8e 62 608'SOL O €v v8 S6L L8€ ZTEL‘89 LL 89 Sc 6S1L LoL SeZ' Lvl €S 8CV SZL 8Lv LEeL €Se'98Z v9 Lov 8eV LOo'L 9VL'Z @LL'0%S bye CLEA Ovs'L BsL'e €6ZL'S saioeds j|\\7 Spoompley ji\¥ Spoompley |elosaUWOOUOLY SPOOMP4JeY |PIDIBWILUOD J8UIO Ud} SO pas 19Y10 yeo pei WieyoN WeO BUY Asioyo yoR|1g uedsy Yyse alum yooeg AsO 91H yosig sodeg YyosIg J98@MS Ydsiq MOj|eA ejdew seBns ejdew pey SPOOM]JOS |I¥ LL0'SZ 0) fo) ) fe) fe) SPOOMIJOS JOYIO S90'LSL Ee p7e 867 9Lb L8Z'L 4oo|WeH SOL'L9Z L1Z Lv0'l Zyz'L vls'Zz 9L0'b ould e114 9¢8'SP 0) fe) (o) vl S8L euld Yor LL9’EL 0) fe) (o) 6z QL suid poy 7ZS'€7 fe) 0) (o) ve 9L 4yjeonids sasse|9o + 0°67 6°87 6°02 681 691 Th “Oul'c -O'6L -OLL -O'SL a a a em aR ee a rae a oe seiseds (jyBiey 1seesg ye Seyoul) ssejo JeJoLWWeIG SS SSS (s9ed} Jo spuesnoy} uj) penunuoos °g ejqe, 15 Z8L'OV 69b'S8 €99'SEL €S9'877 9vS'vZE LZz‘e0s OS6'87'L saisads |IV¥ 9OL'vEe vS0O'S9 L6L‘LOL S8s0'78L 6E6'LSZ TRAE 10) €0v'LOo'L Spoompley |IV ool OLE €00'L €SS'Z OSZ'LL TE8'6GE 867'SEL SpoomMpJey jelosaWWOSUOY 626 cEL'L 6SL'P OvL'v 997'9 Ofr‘Ol L6S'LZ SPOOMPJeY JeldsOWIWOS JBYIO Lv psc OLE 8bZL BLZ'L (0) L8e'zl wu 086'r LLv’s 689'Sl G6r'b~ t76'0€E S06'LZ SSL‘Ev S280 pes 19410 O£0'L Lve'cL 9S0'LL 8e6'6L S8e'LZ LS9‘ZL e8S'9€ EO pos UJOUION SL0'% L£8’€ LEL'L LLO'LL £96'6L 89ZL'0€ S76'67 eo SIIUAA c98 cBL'L cele SS8'v SL8'L ELe' Le eLe'sl Aasayo 49k |g 8b Gée'l LL6‘L ose’e aA 196'S yLOo'Lt uadsy S86'l 899'T LOL't €90'L L8L‘OL LZe'eL Lyr'Ov Yse alu TLL‘ L LL6'L LO6'L c6S'b CEL‘G 6rs'eL tv6'b8 490g 6LL'L ss8'l Lis‘€ ZLS'S LSp'L 6ZL'6 9€9'9€ A10491H S9v c96 9Lv'Z evs’s 681'Z 099'L Ove'6 youig saded 66E'L 662'E vle's brr'll 6s9'91 9P9'LE yL9'9r Yd1Ig JBEMS 068 99L'l vLL'e 86e'9 OLO’s SSL'LZ 97S'9r Yosiq MOjaA L2L'L Lys'e 866'E oe9'8 eL6'0L LOS'6Z Lvs'66 ejdew seBns €LZ's €SZ'6L 9PL'LE eSL'LO crs'98 86S'‘7rlL ELE‘ LEE ejdew poy 924071 Slv'o7 LL8'LZ 89S'9r L09'99 966'r6 Lys'Lvz SPOOMYOS [IV LS Seg GZc'l vOL'e 7899'S SE0'b LEL‘LL SPOOMIJOS 194190 t0C'v 6LL'9 vLL‘'6G zzo’Sl L8E'E7 €07c'Le €S8'L8 yo0|W3a} 49S'9 9v6'6 6E8'ZL 8e0'6L LEL‘LZ O€L‘6E LOO‘ZLL auld arlUAA LLY Lye'L €SL't LZv'sS tE7'9 SOP'v ZOO'SL auld Yoild L8€ 6E8 S98 ZLe cece ess‘ 0 euld pay 86E 9e0'L vLO'L S00'e S8ZL'€ 019'8 SS6'rL 4y/eondds 6 VL 6 CeL 6'OL 68 69 6v 4 -O'EL -O'LL -0'6 {OL “O'S =07€ “OL seioeds (ayBiey yseesg 3e Seyoul) ssejo JoJoOWeIG ($90J} Jo Spuesnoy} uj) S86L ‘puejBug MeN WeUINOS ‘ssejo JeJoWWeIP pue soloeds Aq puejoquul} UO Seed} BAI] JO JBqUUNNY “6 B1GeL 16 so9loads |\7 Spoompuey jy SpoompJey jelosouUWONUORY SPOOMPJeY |BIDIBUULUOD JOYIO al | Sye0 ped 19410 yeo pes Wayyon EO BUM Awiayo yorlg uedsy YSB BUM yooog AsOy9IH yosigq sedeg YO11g J2OMS Yosiq MOjlOA ejdew seBns ejdew pey SPOOMJJOS ||V¥ SPOOMYOS 19410 yoojwey auld elu euld yoild euld poy 4yjeonids 9LS'879'7 O9L'L zS7'8 LSL'9 pls’el 806'SZ 768'€60'7 SZL 686'p LZ0'p LLL'6 Lpp'BL p90'l6L 0 eb 0 0 Ss SOL'LS vl Olz ale BSE SLO'L 960'SL 0 0 0 Lz ov Lvs8'6Sl gz BLL Lo9 9€6 pyo'z LSO'9EL Zel $80'1 \z8 L8z'z byl'y LLy'Lol zz ose zp 8s “£sz'L £8S'9b 0 S raat Of z19 yeS'9z 8 87 ty 0 z9 ys9'78 vy €€7 91Z 8S 8071 SS6'8L1 0 L6L v6L Ltv 8£9 9€8's9 8 0 L6 v2Z Sez £68 0 82 9 LL LLL LZ9°ZLL 0 Ly dt zz 616 SL\'68 €Z 9S £9 faa L6Ee $98'6SL 861 SOS 69e 08S 966 080'769 Svz 66e'1 S82 0€s'z ZOL'b y89'ves Sev €97'e SEL'Z £0L'b Lov'L evs'ze 0 0 0 0 ZL yee'Z8L BL ves vor Ozz'L 6EL'Z Lys'Ovz “se 6ZL'Z 961'Z LSe'e 888'b 988'Se 0 0 6Yy 8 877 gse'y 0 0 0 61 eS pZL'ee 0 0 Lz Lz Lvl a Fhe dt pa et i ee ee ee a a Sesse|o + 0°67 6°82 6°02 681 6°91 iv -O'1Z -O'61 -O'L1 -O'S1 —_ nm mn cL (3yBiay yseesq ye Seyoul) ssejo soJoWeIG soiseds KL (SeeJ4] JO Spuesnoy} u}) penunuos “6 ejqe, 17 White oak (41) Eastern hemlock C58) White pine (81) Growing stock Northern red oak (83) Standing dead Red maple (185) Proportion by Number by species tree class cmt ttons) Figure 5.--Proportion of trees on timberland by tree class and number of growing-stock trees by species, Southern New England, 1985. Amercian beech (4) [Hemlock C5) White oak C6) White pine (8) Gowing stock Red maple (33) Proportion by Number by species tree class Cmitttons) Figure 6.--Proportion of trees on timberland by tree class and number of cull trees by principal species, Southern New England, 1985. Timber Volume, Biomass, and Value Timber volume is reported in both cubic-foot units for growing-stock trees and board-foot units for sawtimber-size trees (that is, 9 inches d.b.h. for softwood and 11 inches d.b.h. for hardwood species). Growing-stock volume increased significantly (29 percent) to an estimated 7.9 billion cubic feet in 1985 (Tables 10-11). Increases were observed for all but the smallest diameter classes (Fig. 7). Volume increased by 58 percent in sawtimber-size hardwood trees, from 1,941.6 to 3,067.9 million cubic feet, the single largest change in any class of timber (Tables 12-13). This is now the predominant class of timber in growing-stock volume (Fig. 8). 18 z'£80'9 aSe 9c? 6281 6 Vee O'L8y L004 O'€96 Zt v6i'l L‘O9L'L S L418 so100ds || Lylr'p L:0% 9 8el 9'OLL O'86L bp soe e'SLv c' 289 S968 8816 8°LS9 SPpOOMPpJeY II wT Lpl el Olt 8°t b'6 Le ool Leek S’6L 9°%7~ | ha 4 SPOOMPIBY 10410 Le oO 6L oO oO [by 4 ce LL 8'Y L’9 Uuj3 L'OL9 67% C Lt 97% 6'Ob e 4s 0°68 “LS2l Lett L°26 L 6 S980 pos 10410 >'788 68 6'Ov 9°SP c'99 c’OoL vsol L’Svl eGZLL evel 9°29 480 pos UOYLON 9 L9E vl ONL O'OL vce 8'el 9° 6b L°9S ECL £°€8 BLY BO BUM LSZL oO LL oO ee 87 9°6 ost 6°62 Le Lee Aueyo 49819 Lg oO oO oO Ls vy 87 O'oL OLL vt 6 el uedsy 6SLZ oO 8°Ol Be v's ech 8°67 ely Lov S8e cL? Yyse O1IUM 9°07L oO 9'e (OF 8b Lobe 8'9oL ve L872 £61 OTL 400g SCeZl oO “LL 6L es £8 esl L°87@ vve 6 cv L°t? AsO¥91H eslt oO oO OL L* 8% v8 vol v'vE 8°77 v6 youlg sede LYvec oO a4 ev oe 9°OL vl Sve Lvs “e9 cv YosIq JOOMS €°00L oO 4 a £9 9 67L 9°OL BSL 9°97 See YOsIq MOjlOA 8°69 vl 8°Sl S'S eel L0e 8°67 CCE 8'eS g'e9 6 ee ejdew sebns €°496 o's 8 zl OeL “et S'9P 9°99 ceel f° 102 Lge S'0@~ ejdew pey y7L9'L SVL O'v8s cLL 6971 9°SZL TAA 8°SL7 L L672 vile 8°6SL SPOOMIjOS [IV 9°6L oO oO Oo oO oO o's 9°e 6 oO? Lv SPOOMIJOS 10419 LSZLE Se S02 O?cL 8'8l 6 VE v9e 8CcL 9°99 “ss OVS 4OO|WOH ZSLO'L LLe s°€9 €°6S ce’ eol 8971 cert 28S O'VSL 6 e7L SUZ ould e114 £98 oO O° oO (ar 4 8'v 9OL 8'vL 6°02 L°O@ cel ould Yyoiig 6°S6 oe oO oO el v9 9 SL orl 8°62 L072 vL ould poy 0°08 oO oO co vl Le srl elt a 4 O'6L S’6 ay/eonids +067 6°87 6°02 6'8L 691 6 VL BCL 6'OL 68 69 sesseB|o “OLS “O61 -OLL “OSL “O'EL “O'LL -0'6 “OL “O'S lv a aT a ae) se1iseds (3yBiey yseesg ye Soyou!) ssej9 JoJOWeIG (394 91GN9 4o suON|W Uj) ZLEL ‘puejBuyZ MeN WoYINoOS ‘ssejo J9JOLWWeIP pue selseds Aq puejequuly UO Seed} 490}S-BUIMOJB Jo OLUNJOA JON “OL 9IGeL 19 €€98'L 0°66 “sts 9°6CE €°0¢cS L6vL £°S00'L Lee‘ eLve'l 9 L9Z‘L esl salseds |IV -O'L0L'S L°0s L'9zz 0 ZL S'9ZE 6°60 LLEZ 6766 O'z90'L LZ00'L "69S Spoompiey II 702 a raga LeL v'9L SLE v'0% 9°87 8°Ob Liz sel Spoompiey 10410 vol 0" 0" 0" ol vl v 9°€ L'v 9°€ 4 wia 9°S9L 81 Lily Eke L'9e s'8S €OLL ev 6eSl “lel 9°49 S20 pe 10410 6'080'L £12 0°89 OLY S'88 Zev 6'6S1 L"€0Z eLL1 L'ZZb 8°SS 320 pos WeYyLON y'Sbe el S72 SLL 0°0z ze z'6E “is v9 6LS 8 Ly }eO SUM LSS 0" cy wl v2 661 ysl L6z 9°8£ 9°Sz SOL Aueyo ye 1g z98 OL Cae a 4 0" el v'Ol 66L 9°27 9°61 9 uedsy 8°vOE 9° rae a 9°6 g'€z Sve £°0S “sv 61S zSp €°6Z yse o1luM z ZS 0" £8 “s ZS eel s'9% £797 OLL z'0z 9°81 yooog 9781 9° o z's v'6 £8 S'Of 8'vE 0'Or L'se “sl A10y91H “Sut 0" 0" Oo" vz £7 v6 y'St z'97 z9€ 8°€Z youlg sedeg 0'L8Z Oo" 4 6° 8°8 vez ele “us o'8s 0°89 ety youlg 128MS 6 ZeL 9°€ ve Gz ze vl sel 9°€Z v'9Z Lite SOL YO4IG MO}OA Le0e 6S £92 SOL 9°91 L"9z 0'0r vor Zep 6°SS L'9% ejdew seBns zeLs't SLL z°99 ole oes L"EOL 9°OLL 8°88Z 6967 yZEe S'68L ejdew poy £°9S1'Z 6'8b Q'6EZ = b'8HL Lee 8°6EZ QPLZ z'6ze €°6LZ 6 SZ 88 SPOOMYOS IV ety 0" Oo" O° 0" & 8° v's 69 e9L Lz SPOOMYOS 10410 Z"009 6°6 8°6E v'vz LLp 8°b9 198 O'SsOL L148 z18 £bS oojweH 8°908'L o'6e 8'66L 8071 zz L'Z9OL 6°61 9°891 vor OeLl z19 ould Oru 0°06 0" o oz vz z9 £8 691 6°0z 8°7Z vol ourd yor, S'Ov 0" 0" oO 8° 8'L 8°6 stl v'OL oz 6" ould poy vol 0" o aa el 8p 8°6 S81 O'el ssl z6 syseonuds ae ES ee ee A +0'6Z 6°8z 6°0z 681 69L 6 vl 6ZL 6OL 68 69 sesse|o O'lZ -O'6L -O'LL -O'S1 -O'EL -O'LL -0'6 OL -0'S liv saiseds (4yBiey yseesq Je seyoul) ssejo soJOWeIG (3203 d1qNd Jo suo U}) S86| ‘puejbuy mex UJeyINOS ‘ssejo Ja}oWeIp pue selseds Aq pueyequil UO Seed} 490}S-BuIMOIB Jo BWINJOA JON “LL PIGeL 20 ‘G86L pue ZZ6L ‘puejbuqZ Man WayjNoS *saiseds jediouid 9244) 10} ssejo sajaweip Aq pue dnos6 saideds pue ssejo Ja}aweip Aq pueyaquil} UO BWN|OA 490}s-Bulmoib Man--"7 a1nbi4 Sse) se }euR)gQ YAU)-OM, “WWICKDPIW 1084 9)0ND JO SU0II1IN Adv Gay Bea) 48}euasQ Y2Us-OM, "W)CKPIW = - Ld o 4 2644 9/9N0 JO SUOJIIIN SNIid 3LIHM NXS1LSV3 SSQ/D 4e}eweIG YoUL-om, “ZULOUPIW asz 1934 S10ND JO SUOLIIIA AVO Gay NYSHLYON SSejQ sepewalg Yyoul-om, "WU! OdpPIW Lo ~ Lad ee o SPpoomp4BH 2261 BpoomaJsos SBB5L BPoomasos TL6L 1°84 SIGNS 49 SUOCLIIIA SQGOOMGHVH ONY SCOOMLSAOS 11V 21 Table 12. Net volume of all live trees by class of timber and species group, Southern New England, 1972 (In millions of cubic feet) Species group Class of timber All Softwoods Hardwoods groups Sawtimber trees: Sawlog portion 1,127.6 1,549.4 2,677.2 Upper stem portion 143.6 392.2 535.8 Total 1,271.2 1,941.6 3,212.9 Poletimber trees 401.2 2,473.1 2,874.3 Total growing stock 1,672.4 4,414.7 6,087.2 Rough trees: Sawtimber size 77.1 130.9 208.1 Poletimber size 29.6 155.4 185.0 Total 106.7 286.4 393.1 Rotten trees: Sawtimber size 8.0 51.1 59.1 Poletimber size 6 39.2 39.8 Total 8.6 90.3 99.0 All live trees 1,787.7 4,791.4 6,579.3 Table 13. Net volume of all live trees by class of timber and species group, Southern New England, 1985 (In millions of cubic feet) Species group Class of timber ——————————————————— All Softwoods Hardwoods groups Sawtimber trees: Sawlog portion 1,571.5 2,460.2 4,031.7 Upper stem portion 182.0 607.7 789.7 Total 1,753.5 3,067.9 4,821.4 Poletimber trees 402.7 2,639.2 3,041.9 Total growing stock 2,156.3 5,707.0 7,863.3 Rough trees: Sawtimber size S122: 147.8 199.1 Poletimber size 34.3 180.3 214.5 Total 85.5 328.1 413.6 Rotten trees: Sawtimber size 4.3 57at 61.3 Poletimber size 537, 47.7 53.4 Total 10.0 104.8 114.7 All-live trees 2,251.7 6,139.9 8,391.6 23 Class of eee EY Poletinber, a Po let inoer, eee eee Rough cull, Rough cull, harcwood f Rotten cull softwood | Rotten cull 98S 41, 000 4,500 2,000 MIillfone of cuble feet Figure 8.--Net growing-stock volume on timberland by class of timber and species group, Southern New England, 1972 and 1985. Increases in growing-stock volume also were observed in every major species except white oaks, for which there was a nonsignificant decrease between surveys (Fig. 9). Removals (timber harvesting) and mortality for this species exceeded gross growth in Massachusetts and Rhode Island and in Southern New England as a whole. Volume increases were especially large for the three principal tree species of Southern New England. Red maple moved ahead of eastern white pine as the individual species with the largest growing-stock volume. Volume increases by diameter class for the three principal species follow the general pattern for all softwoods and all hardwoods (Fig. 7). White pine volume declined in the smaller diameter class and grew, at an increasing rate in the larger diameters. For both red maple and northern red oak, the greatest increases were in the middle diameters. These examples are the result of the maturing of trees within each species. The pines probably were established earlier than the hardwoods. As a result, they are older and larger. The estimated average annual net change in growing-stock volume between the last two surveys (1971-84) is little different than that estimated between the first and second surveys (1957-71) (Table 14). However, the components of the net change are quite different (Fig. 10). Over the first growth period, ingrowth and accretion on existing trees were comparable while accretion was nearly 3.5 times ingrowth over the second period. As the Southern New England forest matures, the recruitment of new trees is declining and the numbers of existing trees is stabilizing while the size of the existing population is increasing. 24 E. white pine Yellow bircn 600 1,200 Millions of cubic feet Figure 9.--Net growing-stock volume on timberland by principal species, Southern New England, 1972 and 1985. Table 14. Average annual net change of growing-stock volume by components of growth and species group, Southern New England, 1957-71' and 1972-84? (In thousands of cubic feet) Softwoods Hardwoods All species Components ee of growth 1957-71 1972-84 1957-71 1972-84 1957-71 1972-84 Ingrowth 34,486 14,416 83,436 43,285 117,922 57,701 Accretion 27,892 62,784 79,768 136,511 107,660 199,295 Gross growth 62,378 77,200 163,204 179,795 225,582 256,996 Mortality -5,568 -6,358 -22,212 -29,177 -27,780 -35,535 Cull increment -1,410 -2,220 -12,492 -7,593 -13,902 -9,793 Net growth 55,400 68,622 128,500 143,025 183,900 211,668 Removals -11,444 -30,479 -31,076 -41,134 -42,520 -71,613 Net change 43,956 38,143 97,424 101,891 141,380 140,055 'Data from Kingsley (1974). 2Data from Dickson and McAfee (1988a, 1988b, 1988c). 25 Components of growth a Accretion Mortal tty Cull tnerement 252-157, Removals cere ae |i |as72-1984 40 80 Millions of cubic Teet Components of growth Accretion Mortality es) Eastern white pine Cull [nerement Millions of cubIc feet Figure 10.--Average annual net change of growing-stock volume on timberland by components of growth and growth period for all species combined and for three principal species, Southern New England, 1952-71 and 1971-84. 26 Loss of volume to mortality increased from the first to second growth period (Table 14), a probable consequence of natural factors (for example, competition, insects, and disease). The loss of growing-stock volume to cull increment has declined slightly due to a reduction of cull in hardwood species. Removals increased by an average of nearly 30 million cubic feet per year from the first to second growth period (Fig. 10). While the ratio of growth to removals has declined from the first growth period, it nevertheless remains 3 to 1 over the most recent growth period. The change in growing-stock volume since the 1972 survey differs by species (Fig. 10). For the three principal species, based on growing-stock volume, accretion on standing volume was the major growth component over the period. Red maple accretion as a percentage of 1972 standing volume was the largest at 4.6 percent, but white pine and northern red oak were only slightly lower at 4 and 3.7 percent, respectively. While sampling errors were not calculated, it is possible there were no significant differences in accretion as a percentage of standing volume among the species. Ingrowth was a relatively minor growth component for two of the three species. Ingrowth of red maple from seedling/sapling to poletimber-size trees was 31 percent of total gross growth but only about 13 percent for white pine and northern red oak. Mortality over the growth period was similar among the species. As a percentage of standing volume, removals were greatest in absolute and relative terms for white pine. For each species, growth exceeded removals by 2.5 (white pine) to 6.6 (red maple) fold. Growth of northern red oak was 2.8 times removals. Board-foot volume increased by a significant 50 percent to an estimated 20 billion board feet between 1972 and 1985 (Tables 15-16). The increase was observed across all diameter classes but was particularly large for hardwood species, as a large number of trees grew into the smallest diameter class for classification as sawtimber (11.0 to 12.9 inches) (Fig. 11). Board-foot volume increased for every principal tree species in Southern New England (Fig. 12) and for most lesser common species except paper birch and elm species (Tables 15-16). Red maple was predominant in board-foot volume among hardwood species, replacing northern red oak. Board-foot volume has increased in every standard-lumber log grade for both softwood and hardwood species (Fig. 13). Rates of volume increase are greatest in the lesser grades (Tables 17-18). This was somewhat expected as size criteria, that is, minimum diameter and sawlog length, are primary considerations in grading and the majority of sawtimber-size trees and sawtimber volume are in the smaller diameter trees (Tables 9 and 16). Wood has been increasingly used for fuelwood in recent years, not only for home use but also for industrial and commercial use and for the generation (or cogeneration) of electricity. Traditionally, fuelwood was sold by the cord (128 cubic feet). On commercial scales, wood for fuel is considered biomass and sold by weight, generally tons of green weight. In Southern New England, it is estimated that there are slightly less than 500 million tons green weight of tree biomass (Table 19). Nearly 60 percent of this resource is in growing-stock 27 L'Z9e'eL Lvydl 6° €SO'L 6 €S8 9POP'L vy 6EL'T 8° Ly6'~ L°SZZ'€ 9°66 9 E8L's8 o°OoL 8879 Stes e968 L6Eee'L 6 EL6'L v°7269'7 = ce sle by 4 oss Lvl 6 ev oss vL9 CCL 3 f9e oO oel oO oO 9¢ 68 SLL = 7 L8b'l vel ovs L'vOl 9vs8L f° 8ve sege vesy : 901722 6°Ov eel L°602 e908 8 vvL L£sSs¢ 6°09S : 8°989 cg 3 eev S°SOL vc9 6° L0E BS LLE ; 6 6vL oO Ov oO 6el vel Lov Bel z 9LL oO Oo oO ve o6lL Sel Lev = Scr oO esyv VILL L°8e 8°8v feel Lect : vvle oO osl oO 6 Sz 86 fv. vy g9Ol : LLLE oO ele SLE a 4 ose 819 vel = 6 eel oO oO ve Ss 9 EL “se £89 2 o'962 oO 9°OL a4 Let OLY fCL 6671 = 9g OrL oO £OL es eC? (ard oss 9°SY : 8°€0S “£9 Giz 8°e7e 2s 8°76 oszél GS LZeL = 9°OEL'L 8°Sz 69S v°09 oss L°L07 Lege Lvov 2 98LL'S Lol c°SOv S.Lze y'89S L662 8 €Z6 9°S80'L 9°6v6 esv oO oO oO oO oO 8'6L 9°L 6 SL 9°vv0'L ssl S LOL v°0S 8°¢8 cosh erst LSle S°80¢ 6 LOv’e o°9s 9°€0€ LLle c Sor L£92S vic9o ose9 cely 6 S6L oO oO oO Zs Lic Sov 6S L°S9 L872 oO oO oO 8S cCe © 69 O'v9 LOLL 8°S0c oO oO oO o9 6 cL L£g9 oS cOL a ee ee ee ae ee ee +O°'67% 6°82 6°02 6 8l 691 6 VL 6 cL 6OL Sessejo O1e -O'6L “OLL “OSL -O'EL “OLL -0'6 Iv QyBiey yseosq ye Soyoul) ssejo JoJOWeIG eee Se Se EE (382) pueog yo suoNpw u}) soiveds jv spoompiey jiy Spoompuey 12410 wa S}BO pal 194109 80 pol WOYyON eo SUM Aaiayo 49e1g uedsy YSB SUA yoeeg A10491H youig sedeg yosig J29MS Yosiq MO}JRA ejdew seBns ejdew pey SPOOMIOS jIV~V SPOOMYOS 129410 yoojweapy ould au euid yoiig ould poy 4ysaonids saieds ZL6L ‘puejbuy men UJouINOS ‘ssejd JoJOWeIP pue selseds Aq puepequin UO Seel} JOqUUIZMES JO OLUNJOA ION) “GL 9IGeL 28 bOOL'0% LL8b e'67'e L°8zS'l o'78e'z 9°8P7'E O'OrL'b 6'€86'b L°006 LL8Z‘ZL bse O° LOE'L S°6e8 O'sLr'l G'661L'2 L°686'7 L87L'€ ; e'yss 9°6 S69 9°29 8°08 L8el £18 £901 : €'9¢e O° (oO oO 6b ay 4 bel O'eL ; 8°S69'L L°OL Cc vET veel e sgl 6 7S2 OLD L°OSb 5 z'€S0'€ S’SOL CELE L’68L O'E6E 6'1c9 o°’Ss9 S)SSZ i o'sLs Ls O'ZOL S88 c'L6 9 LSL S891 L°007 = 8S 7LE oO ce 8°Of elt £18 9°74 © Zol - s’O9l 8S Ett BLL O° CL Sev s'08 : Leed Lv 8°09 S'Ov €°O0L 9°6EL £°6072 L°8Zl = ely oO LSP 8°87 CCL cLg 9° ZOL S86 F Leee vy oO 8Le LLv L6E cGel 9°6EL 5 o'ozl oO oO Oo SOL LOL 69 o°c9 ; £06 Oo 9°8 vv £'Ov vcol eO0el L°vO7? = 6877 evi cLt L’6 vst L872 60S 6°88 = vStl 9°92 6 92L 2°99 oL9 €°SOl 9 cOL SOLL : L°Z90'€ 8°6S 9°68 6'OvL veLE 9CbL 9°789 L'yZLo'L : ChEVENL aa A Sacclial 9°889 0'v06 Z6v0'L 6'OSL'L z°SS7'L £°006 v'6Ee oO oO oO oO 6 4 SLL cst z°998'L c°0S e°S6L 6 OLL 89172 6 ele v6vE c'O6E S622 8 LL8'b L°cé6L O'Le6 L°€9S 6499 SELL c'789 6959 Le9v “LBL oO oO 06 66 9°E7~ S'O€ ecs a) erst oO oO co oe s’8 Sev v'09 O'9€ 6761 oO oO gS s'9 Sez 8 ev S72 Lev sessejo Iv +0°62 68 6'8L sOVEL 69L -O'SL 6 VL “O'EL (iyBiey yseesq ye Sayoul) ssejo soJoWeIG erm (398) pseog Jo suoyjw U}) soeloeds |iv7 Spoompuey j\\¥ SpoOoMpJeY 19410 al | S280 pes 19410 yeo pes UWeYyON HeEO BIIUM Assays yoR|1g uedsy Yse B1lUM yooeg AJOy9IH yosig sedeg YosIg J2OMS YddIq MOj|OA ejdew seBns ejdew poy SPOOMYOS ||V¥ SPOOMIYOS 18U1IO yoojweH auld e11yA euld yoid euld poy jyjeonids seioeds S861 ‘pue|buZ MeN UeYINOS ‘ssejd JeJQWeIP pue selseds Aq pue|Jequul} UO S901} JOGUINMES JO OLUNIOA JON “9 9IGeL 29 Millfons of board feet 4,000 1972 softwoods 14 16 18 Midpoint, two-inch diameter class Figure 11.--Net board-foot volume on timberland by diameter class and species group, Southern New England, 1972 and 1985. ETE E. white pine AM I HAE AT eastern hemlock TT URE AMA Yellow birch Fit Hickeries fF 2,000 3, 000 Mi llfons of board feet Figure 12.--Net board-foot volume on timberland by principal species, Southern New England, 1972 and 1985. 30 ool Sl bY pz ray ool 81 vS 6L 6 epesB yore ul poompiey jo jUed10g TLL‘ LL%s 0'09S'L LLes €°86S 9° €8L'8 Z'6Lb'L £°06E'b 8°4SS'L £°9SL Spoompley |i¥ 9°81 681 6°09 S'SS feb z°8Le €°8S 6'SLL S76 91S SPpOOMpIBY 19410 9S ram Ls L8 os €°9€ Gt Lez “8 os wij epeg 6 LEL 6° 1S7 9°0SL 8°€6 ZL8b'L 8° bOb G’BLL 8°9b7 Coe S4BO pes 10410 O'V6L'L pv Lol L°69b O'see 6' p87 9°01Lz'Z z'9%Z 8°S60'L €°8~S €'Ove 480 pos WOYON ZL9Z 94S o'eoL 8°79 6 LE 8°989 9°S9L L6ve Tay al vbr 480 O11IUM Se Gb L6L tay 2 (of 6'6tL v'7Z €vOl (Al oy Ausayo 49819 ee 91 GL £8 eb LL L'6 6'Sb b'rl 8 uedsy S‘9rl OLL b'6P Liv G'8e GZrr 84S 8061 LsLt 8°SZ yse ollUMA 9°€6 SL L°08 v" OL pplz Z'9€ O'vzz O'LL we yooeg O'9eL o'0£ O'8P Lze 0°97 PELE Ord S'8rl 94S 6'0€ Aso¥91H SOL SL 68 9 oh 6 E71 871 £99 v'Le vl youlg sede 6'€6 ES Ls O'eL SLL 0°96Z ptr z°8s8l Sty 8°77 Yodlq J2@@MS 0'Ob v's Lz ore ge 9°OrL O'9€ vLl v'2z 6b Yosig MOEA €'1Sz Ls e Zz O'by 9°22 8°€0S 8°66 8°L67 6 LL z'8z ejdew seBns €°7Ov LOL 6 Lvz b'6S 6'bz 9'OEL'L L°62%z Lppd 8°6ZL 9°LZ ejdew pey S'691L'7 L8e9 LS6Z BELT €'%7S 9°8LL'S 0'660'L 0'666'L O'9LS 9°p9S'L SPpOOM}JOS IIV¥ ro : O° 0" oy €'8b - O° (op €°8p SPOOMIJOS 19410 L°60b . - - L°60b 9'bbO'L D - - 9°bbO'L 490|WeH G'7L9'L L8e9 Z7SL S'807 9°EZ 6° LOb’e 0°660'L b'B0L'L LLLe pit auld elu b'Oe . LZ 97 oy 6°S6L = 8°6S1L ele 8'rL euld Yo O'se - z’Sl Liz mey4 L°78z 8°01 “ce Leer euld poy 681 - G : 681 8°S0Z = z = 8°S07 4y/eonids sepelbB bp opel £ epely Z 9pesy | 9peiy sepesB bp Epes € 9pesy Z epesy | spesy Th Th soiseds 1yBioey seoiq je soJOWRIG ,GL< SOSSBIO OZIS || (100) pueog jo suoI|IW Uj) ZLEL ‘puejBuyZ MON UJoYINOS ‘epes6 Bo) Joquunj-psepueys pue ‘ssejo oZIs ‘se1loeds Aq pue|iequuil} UO SOeJ] JOGUUIIMBS JO OWNIOA JON “ZL 9IGeL 31 sepesB Boy s9quun|-piepuels ou! papuip jou oe salsads esau], *sBo] UONONIYSUOD JOj 942 UNOS SIy} Ul SOWINIOA ay} ‘spoompiey 304 “ould a}1yM 0} AjuO Saydde p apelin, "Ina youl-p/ | jeuoMeUs93U), “yb Seige! “(2886L ‘IS86l “88861) 2939 pue uOsy9Iq Wo BJep Bulwiuuns Aq pejeesd si 91qe) SI4], ool zz ly 4 vl ool Sz is au L epesB yoke ul Poompiey jo yu99I0qg €Se3'S €°062'1 9°Z0v'~ GsSte'l 6 £08 ZT 98L'TL O6SL’E L£67S’9 t8te'7 €698 Spoompiey {lV GS6SE oss 6 vel 69 €°OoL ce vss py LOL LLve GLté 9°ZOL Spoompiey 10410 esl Gt ty A o9 oO 92 vv Ov Ww oO uj vy 6L9 ecst eco c8cS 9°SOL £g69'1 vy 66Y py lsz L°Ste 8°60L S80 pal 10419 L-ess’L 9°96L c Svs OCcLS ©6672 f° €S0’€ e Lev Ge9on'l L£S¢c8 L9cE 80 pos UIOYLON £90S VLeL e248 OOLL 088 osLs ce Sce Syve 8 Zbl S°OOL eo s}1UM 8°60L Sel 6 ev c8e cS SCLE “£38 fer 97S osc Aueyo 40e1g Lg o9 ove vce v8 9°O9L 6 ee VSL 6 6e v8 uedsy 8° EOE cCy Lee 6 SeL OeL LCEL vy GEL L°8SE S6le “st Yse OU G ice 89 vcr v6 6 ce felpv O?cz1L 6°0SZ 6 St Sve yoe0q “Lett SLL L°96 68 ar4 Le6e LL6 O LEZ evs Ly As0491H] 9LL 4 eo | oo foyte) OOcL ySc G49 ty 4 foyte) youg sedeg cOSt £99 ee9 L°9 Lvl © O06p LLSL 6612 oly vLt Yyosig J2eMS Lele a 24 S62 06 rae | 612 61S o9slL vst QOL Yosig MO}jOA GS SOv LOvlL 6 OPL 9°St sz vy Sel Ae 3 4 6 LEE S82 SLs ejdew seins O'L8Z’L 9°c8E S°S69 GZ4SL Sp L°Z90°E OSv6E 9°66Z'L L°CLe v SY ejdew poy S6tL’E 6°890'L O'OLg9'L ce 960 LYvSS €C7E'L L°9SS'L 8°O6L'7 7c 608 79912 SPOOMYOS jjV Sv oo [oxte) fo} o) 4 © 6e = oe oO e9E SPOOMIYOS 194190 ‘Opry = = = Oph 7°998'L = = = 7°998'L pvojweH ySsL‘e 6°890'L 7°S9S'L €Sssv 0°99 LLL8'v oO Lys’L c v3sp'e LE69L 8°0L ould s1uM LOv z 8°6e 6 OL oo 8°00 6 © 6st VCE oo ould Yyotid osl = ost [oyte) foyte) vist = evr tL [oyte) ould poy 96E ? = = 9°6E 6 Cc6L = = = 6c6L ply/eonds sepelb py opel € epei c Opel L Spel sepelB sb 9pbid € epei c epely L 9peiO liv liv soiseds wyBiey yseosq je soJ}OWRIG Gi < SOSSBIO 9ZIS iV (390) paeog jo suonpu uy) eS861 ‘puejBuZ MeN WeUYINOS ‘epes6 Ho] sequN|-psepuejs pue ‘ssejo oZIs ‘solseds Aq puePequIQ UO S80I} JOQUINMEBS JO BWINJOA JON “Sl P/G2L 32 Log grade/Species group i i | 4 4 2.000 3, 000 4,000 Millions of board feet Figure 13.--Net board-foot volume on timberland by standard-lumber log grade and species group, Southern New England, 1972 and 1985. volume; the remaining portion is in the tops of growing-stock trees, cull trees, salvable dead, stumps, and sapling-size trees. There also is a sizable resource in trees or parts of trees not typically considered as a commercial product. The distribution of tree biomass by species is the same as the distribution of tree numbers or volume by species (Fig. 14). As expected, a large portion of the biomass resource is in red maple, a species of littlke commercial value as lumber or fiber. While we have no remeasurement of biomass, there is every reason to believe that it is accreting at a rate similar to or exceeding that of growing-stock volume. Timber is the primary commodity product derived from New England’s forests. Nevel and Wharton (1988) provide a discussion of the timber industries of Southern New England. Other detailed information on removals and commerial use are available from state forest survey reports. Volume growth as reported earlier has been converted to compound rates of value change for New England’s timber stands (Arner et al. 1990) and trees (Gansner et al. 1990). While these reports are for all six New England States, the findings are applicable to Southern New England alone. On average, between the last two forest surveys, forest stands have appreciated by 4.2 percent (Arner et al. 1990). However, there is considerable variability in this estimate. Estimates of value change estimates for individual stands ranged from -26 to 43 percent. 33 Table 19. Net green weight’ of all trees on timberland by class of timber and species group, Southern New England, 1985 (In thousands of tons) Class of timber Softwoods Hardwoods All groups Sawtimber trees: Sawlog portion 55,470 92,861 148,331 Upper stem 6,110 22,585 28,695 Total 61,580 115,446 177,026 Poletimber trees 11,292 95,879 107,171 All growing stock 72,872 211,325 284,197 Rough cull trees? 3,418 19,389 22,807 Rotten cull trees. 646 6,644 7,290 Salvable dead trees® 3,663 9,752 13,415 Saplings® 6,036 32,110 38,146 Stumps* 1,112 5,711 6,823 Tops: Growing stock 24,000 77,496 101,496 Rough and rotten 1,417 9,614 11,031 All nongrowing stock 40,292 160,716 201,008 All classes 113,164 372,041 485,205 "Includes bark and sound cull; excludes rotten cull Bole portion of trees 5.0 inches d.b.h. and larger 3includes entire tree aboveground 4Of all salvable dead and all live trees 5.0 inches d.b.h. and larger The principal determinants of value change were species composition, tree size, and stocking. Stands with eastern white pine, white ash, or red oak appreciated more in value than stands dominated by other species. with smaller initial average diameter appreciated more in value as they tended to grow into the more valuable sawtimber-size class. Finally, more lightly stocked stands grow faster than more heavily stocked stands and , therefore, appreciate more in value. The average annual rate of value change for all trees averaged 3.2 percent between the last two forest surveys (Gansner et al. 1990). As reflected in determinants of timber stands appreciation, the species with the highest rates of value change were white ash (5.8 percent), northern red oak (4.8), and eastern white pine (3.7). Value increased most rapidly for trees that grew into the sawtimber-size class between the surveys. Value appreciation was inversely correlated to basal-area stocking, which is a primary determinant of volume growth. 34 Spec les E. white pine Eastern nemiock Other sof twoods Red raple Suger raple Sweet birch Anerican beecn White ash White ani N. red ocak Other red cake Other hardwoods 40, 000 60,000 Thousands of tons Figure 14.--Net all-live tree green weight on timberland by principal species, Southern New England, 1985. Forest Wildlife Habitat DeGraaf and Rudis (1986) listed 25 amphibians, 20 reptiles, 163 birds, and 59 mammals that are found in forested habitats. Most of these species occur in one or more states in Southern New England. A habitat evaluation for each wildlife species would be impractical. Alternatively, FIA collected field data that quantify the composition, vertical and horizontal structure, and selected special habitat features of Southern New England forests. While these data cannot evaluate habitat quality for individual species as precisely as a single-species habitat survey, they do provide information with which to evaluate habitat for a large number of wildlife species (Brooks and Birch 1988; Brooks 1989, 1990). The woody-stemmed forest understory, composed of tree seedlings and saplings and shrubs, provides potential cover and browse and mast forage for wildlife. More than 70 species were recorded in the last Southern New England forest survey (Table 20). The average density of the woody understory is more than 12,000 individuals per acre of forest. Curiously, the highest density was estimated to occur in poletimber-size stands (15,692/acre) and the lowest density in sawtimber-size stands (10,063/acre). Sapling/seedling-size stands were intermediate in density (12,034/acre). Hardwood tree seedlings and saplings had the greatest number of species but unidentified hardwood shrubs were the most common entry after blueberry species. On the basis of relative density (estimated numbers of individuals) and relative frequency (number of plots where recorded), blueberry species are the most "important" understory woody-stemmed plant species in Southern New 35 Table 20. Number of seedlings, saplings, and shrubs on timberland by species and stand-size class, Southern New England, 1985 (In millions of stems) Stand-size class Species ———— EEE All Percent Sapling/ classes saplings Sawtimber _Poletimber seedling Nonstocked Eastern redcedar 6 39 2 ce) 47 44 Spruce species 34 Oo 8 0 42 33 Pitch pine 21 8 3 0 32 69 Eastern white pine 496 151 32 0 679 22 Eastern hemlock 226 12 O Oo 238 30 Other softwoods 42 30 ce) ce) 71 8 All softwoods 826 239 45 0 1,110 Red maple 1,481 1,045 172 (¢) 2,698 14 Sugar maple 822 402 115 6 1,346 11 Other maple species 389 180 12 fe) 581 3 Serviceberry 98 87 3 (0) 188 5 Yellow birch ; 254 81 9 0 344 17 Sweet birch 304 191 98 O 593 14 Paper birch 146 34 fe) fe) 180 7 Gray birch 137 85 6 0 229 25 American hornbeam 189 133 2 0 324 6 Hickory species 147 125 16 fe) 288 10 American chestnut 132 81 24 Oo 237 3 Flowering dogwood 109 54 2 Oo 165 3 Hawthorn 26 12 fe) fe) 38 0 American beech 497 161 0 0 659 15 White ash 662 142 81 (e) 885 5 Other ash species 45 50 ce) Oo 95 2 Yellow-poplar 4 3 0 fe) 8 25 Apple species 6 (0) 17 0 23 (0) Blackgum 88 60 3 0 151 18 Eastern hophornbeam 256 74 73 Oo 403 2 Aspen species 74 13 66 i¢) 154 12 Pin cherry 78 18 54 ce) 149 7 Black cherry 854 310 127 fe) 1,291 2 Chokecherry 128 155 fe) ie) 282 oO Other cherries ce) 5 15 fe) 20 75 White oak 352 388 15 (@) 755 10 Scarlet oak 36 79 13 fe) 127 20 Bear oak 14 32 103 Oo 148 2 Chestnut oak 42 55 3 fe) 99 2 Northern red oak 563 496 31 O 1,089 4 Black oak 394 375 95 fe) 864 5 Willow species 59 28 54 Oo 142 0 Sassafras 111 327 18 ce) 455 2 American basswood 24 3 0 0 27 fe) American elm 32 20 9 0 61 21 Other hardwoods 147 8 Oo Oo 156 3 All hardwoods 8,701 5,313 1,236 6 15,257 All trees 9,527 5,552 1,281 6 16,367 _ Table 20. continued (In millions of stems) Stand-size class Species ee All Sapling/ classes Sawtimber _Poletimber seedling Nonstocked Common juniper 100 11 0 0 a Sheep laurel 284 1,035 14 0 1,333 Mountain laurel 1,570 884 18 fe] 2,472 Other evergreen shrubs 10 77 1 0 88 All evergreen shrubs 1,963 2,008 33 f¢) 4,004 Alder 699 543 261 0 1,504 Azalea 186 383 fe) 0 570 Barberry 883 254 213 fe] 1,350 Sweetfern 19 21 5 0 44 Silky dogwood 4 18 24 0 46 Other dogwood species 277 240 176 0 693 American hazelnut 339 49 0 0 388 Beaked hazelnut 79 3 fe) fe] 82 Huckleberry species 321 467 279 0 1,067 Witch-hazel 698 438 38 0 1,174 Winterberry holly 18 32 0 0 50 Common spicebush 743 337 50 0 1,130 Bush honeysuckle 165 86 189 0 440 Buckthorn 224 258 2 0 484 Sumac species 20 34 56 2 112 Rose species 152 ue? 62 fe) 326 Rubus species 1,135 458 790 15 2,399 American elderberry 4 128 19 0 150 Spirea species 820 1,089 211 0 ail Blueberry species 4,949 10,190 638 0 15,778 Maple-leaved viburnum 1,895 519 (0) 0 2,414 Hobblebush viburnum 103 201 24 0 328 Wild raisin, witherod 52 70 0 fe) 122 Arrowwood 534 452 82 0 1,067 Other viburnum species 404 266 8 fe) 678 Other deciduous shrubs 3,285 2,891 493 0 6,669 All deciduous shrubs 18,009 19,540 3,620 17 41,186 All species 29,499 27,100 4,935 23 61,558 37 England forests (Fig. 15). This ranking is based on the relative density of the genus, accounting for more than 24 percent of all recorded plants (Table 21). Red maple is a distant second accounting for just over 5 percent of recorded plants. Red maple also is the most widely distributed understory species, occurring on more than 87 percent of the survey plots. Northern red oak is the second most widely distributed species. Of all species, biueberry is the most widely distributed shrub. Species Biueberry species Red maple N. red oak White oak E. white pine Black cherry Black oak Map le-leaved vi burnum Rubus species Sugar maple Fe Relative density a Relative frequenc Importance value ese ed | she ral —— 10 15 20 Relative value Cpercent) Mountain laurel White ash Figure 15.--Relative density, frequency, and importance value of lesser woody stems on timberland by principal species, Southern New England, 1985. Mast, either as nuts, fruits, or large seeds, is an important forage resource for Southern New England forest wildlife. The principal overstory mast-producing tree species are the oaks (Table 22), accounting for an estimated 232 million trees, out of a total 312 million (74 percent). More than half of these oaks are either red or black oak. Other common mast-producing tree species are hickories, beech, and black cherry. Principal mast-producing shrub species include blueberries, Rubus, viburnums, and huckleberries (Table 20). Mast production is related to tree competition, which influences crown volume for overstory trees (Spurr and Barnes 1980) or exposure to direct sunlight for shrubs (Gill and Healy 1974). The increase in average size of New England forest trees is beneficial to overstory mast production. However, the concomitant increase in stocking is detrimental to both overstory (competition between adjacent tree crowns) and understory (decrease in sunlight) mast producers. 38 Table 21. Relative density, relative frequency, importance value, and species frequency of lesser woody stems by species, Southern New England, 1985 Species Relative Relative Importance Species density frequency value frequency Balsam fir 12 .07 .10 oTLL white-cedar 01 .03 .02 .24 Common juniper .18 .19 .18 1.89 Eastern redcedar .13 54 .34 5.43 Tamarack .03 .07 .05 71 Norway spruce .02 .05 .04 .48 Red spruce 18 .28 .23 2.84 Red pine .04 .26 GLK: 2.60 Pitch pine .19 73 .46 7.32 Eastern white pine 1.78 4.46 3.12 45.05 Scotch pine 01 .03 02 .24 Northern white-cedar 01 .03 02 .24 Eastern hemlock .69 2.13 1.41 21.47 Boxelder 01 .03 .02 .24 Striped maple 77 56 .67 5.67 Red maple 5.01 8.67 6.84 87.74 Silver maple 01 .03 .02 .24 Sugar maple 2.24 3.06 2.65 30.90 Mountain maple 13 19 16 1.89 Ailanthus 01 .03 .02 .24 Alder species 2.32 .66 1.49 6.61 Serviceberry .30 .59 .44 5.90 Chokeberry species 05 .03 .04 .24 Azalea species .88 .38 .63 3.78 Barberry 2.08 59 1.33 5.90 Yellow birch .66 2.52 1.59 25.48 Sweet birch 1.15 3.52 2.34 35.62 Paper birch .44 1.50 .97 15.10 Gray birch .42 1.03 dia 10.38 American hornbeam 51 .70 61 7.08 Hickory species .33 1.68 1.01 16.99 Bitternut hickory 01 .03 .02 .24 Pignut hickory .07 .70 .39 7.08 Shagbark hickory .10 .84 .47 8.50 Mockernut hickory 01 ae .07 1.18 American chestnut 37 75 .56 TE American bittersweet * - - - 1.18 Clematis species * - - - .24 Sweetfern .07 aUr/ Sue? 1.66 Flowering dogwood .26 .56 41 5.67 Alternate-leaved dogwood SU 14 13 1.42 Silky dogwood .08 ae 10 1.18 Round-leaved dogwood .07 .07 .07 “TAL Table 21. continued Species Relative Relative Importance Species density frequency value frequency Panicled dogwood .67 35 51 3.54 Red-osier dogwood .23 eLZ/ .20 1.66 Canadian bunchberry * - - - 1.18 Hawthorn species .06 19 ae 1.89 American hazelnut .60 .66 .63 6.61 Beaked hazelnut .13 SU) 16 1.89 American beech 1.15 1.82 1.49 18.40 White ash 1.55 3.69 2.62 37.27 Black ash -16 .33 .25 3.31 Green ash 01 .05 .03 .48 Creeping snowberry * - - - 2.84 Teaberry * - - - 12.51 Huckleberry 1.65 .24 94 2.36 Witch-hazel 1.81 2.17 1.99 21.94 Winterberry holly .08 14 11 1.42 Butternut .01 .14 .08 1.42 Sheep laurel 2.05 .80 1.43 8.02 Mountain laurel 3.81 1.50 2.65 15.10 Common spicebush 1.74 1.40 1.57 14.16 Yellow-poplar .02 35 19 3.54 Bush honeysuckle .68 .45 .56 4.49 Vine honeysuckle * - - - .24 Apple species .05 .33 19 3.31 Partridgeberry * - - - 10.38 Black tupelo .25 54 .39 5.43 Eastern hophornbeam .63 1.01 82 10.15 Virginia creeper * - - - 3.54 Ninebark .01 .03 .02 .24 American sycamore .01 .05 .03 .48 Balsam poplar 01 .03 .02 .24 Eastern cottonwood .02 .14 .08 1.42 Bigtooth aspen .10 73 -41 7.32 Quaking aspen .24 .80 52 8.02 Cherry species .04 .05 .04 .48 Pin cherry .28 59 .43 5.90 Black cherry 2.15 4.06 3.10 41.04 Chokecherry 44 .66 55 6.61 White oak 1.71 4.97 3.34 50.24 Swamp white oak .01 .07 .04 71 Scarlet oak 31 1.96 1.14 19.82 Scrub, bear oak .23 sLiZ/ .20 1.66 Pin oak 01 .05 .03 .48 Chestnut oak .20 .66 -43 6.61 40 Table 21.-continued Species Relative Relative Importance Species density frequency value frequency Northern red oak 215 5.99 4.07 60.62 Post oak .01 .03 .02 .24 Black oak 1.59 4.20 2.89 42.46 Buckthorn species 75 .24 .49 2.36 Smooth sumac 02 .03 .02 .24 Staghorn sumac 14 .26 .20 2.60 Poison ivy * - - - 13.45 Poison sumac .03 .07 .05 FAL Currant species .02 .03 .03 .24 Black locust 01 .03 .02 .24 Rose species .51 .40 .45 4.01 Rubus species 3.69 1.99 2.84 20.05 Willow species .22 14 .18 1.42 American elderberry .24 14 .19 1.42 Sassafras T/L 1.45 1.08 14.63 Greenbrier * - - - 12.98 American mountain ash 01 .05 .03 .48 European mountain ash .01 .03 .02 .24 Spirea species 3.27 1.29 2.28 12.98 American basswood .05 .24 14 2.36 Elm species 01 mie) 05 .95 American elm SLA .61 .39 6.14 Slippery elm 01 .03 .02 .24 American bladdernut .03 .05 .04 .48 Blueberry 24.27 5.13 14.70 51.89 Viburnum species .33 .28 31 2.84 Maple-leaved viburnum 3.72 2.03 2.87 20.52 Hobblebush viburnun 51 .40 .46 4.01 Wild raisin .19 31 .25 3.07 Arrowwood 1.65 1.29 1.47 12.98 Nannyberry .43 .40 .42 4.01 Blackhaw .04 .05 .05 .48 Highbush cranberry .26 .07 AD Th Grape * - - - 6.14 Unknown vine * - - - 2.13 Unknown dwarf shrub * .00 .00 .00 1.66 Unknown deciduous shrub 10.17 2.73 6.45 27.60 Unknown evergreen shrub .14 19 91H 88e (0) 0) fo) (e) fo) 0) (o) 08 08 877 AisaqediAses 886'8 fo) fo) fo) fe) r4it LS GLZ vLL 998'7 O€L’S Jepeopas uleysey + 0°67 6°87 6°07 681 691 6'vL 6 ZL 6'OL 68 6'9 SOSSBl9 -O'LZ -O'61L -O'L1L -O'SL -O'EL -O'LL -0'6 -OL -O'S iv sa1iseds (jyBiey yseesq ye SeyoUl) ssejo JoJOWeIG (S9e1} JO Spuesnoy} u}) S861 ‘pue|bug MeN UJaYINOS ‘ssejo JOJOWeIP pue saideds Aq puejsaquui, UO seed} Bulonposd-jinay pue -ynu BAIj-j]e Jo JaqUINNY “ZZ eIGeL 42 Cavities in forest trees are used by many wildlife species for both temporary shelter and as nesting sites. It is estimated that there are 87 million trees with observed cavities in Southern New England forests (Table 23). While the largest number with cavities is in growing-stock hardwood stems, dead trees with broken tops are the most likely to have an observed cavity (Fig. 16). There are at least two reasons for this: 1) dead trees without foliage are more reliably searched for cavities, and 2) trees with broken tops are likely to be infected with heart rot and, therefore, more likely to be excavated by primary cavity-nesting birds. Nevertheless, cavities in live trees are an important wildlife resource and should be retained whenever possible during silvicultural activities (Healy et al. 1989). Standing-dead trees account for slightly less than 10 percent of all trees in Southern New England, or an estimated 95 million stems (Table 24). When compared with equivalent categories of live trees, standing-dead trees are more likely to be softwoods (21.9 versus 29.1 percent, respectively). Eastern white pine is the most common species of standing-dead tree constituting 17 percent of all standing-dead stems and estimated to number 16 million trees (Fig. 17). Standing-dead hardwoods are more likely to be of the white-oak group. White oaks, especially chestnut oak, are preferentially susceptible to mortality from gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) defoliation. Finally, standing-dead trees are more likely to be smaller in diameter than live trees (89 percent of standing-dead stems are 5.0 to 10.9 inches d.b.h. versus 79 percent of live trees). This is undoubtedly due in part to competition and suppression as a result of high levels of stocking. Ownership Forest ownership patterns in Southern New England have been surveyed by FIA. Timberland in Southern New England is essentially privately owned, with only 14 percent (692,400 acres) in public ownership. The privately owned forest is, in turn, principally held by individuals and farmers. Corporate and forest industry timberlands account for less than 10 percent of the privately owned timberland. It is estimated that there are nearly 360,000 private timberland ownership units (individuals, farmers, corporations, etc.) in Southern New England. There is an inverse relationship between the size (in acres) of ownership units and the number of owners, with 77 percent of all ownerships holding 1 and 9 acres (Fig. 18). This relationship differs when the distribution of timberland by size of ownership unit is considered. The 77 percent of timberland owners holding fewer than 10 acres each cumulatively own nearly 600,000 acres of timberland, or 13 percent of the total. Owners of 20 to 199 acres hold larger proportions of timberland than owners of smaller units but the latter are greater in number (Fig. 18). 43 saioeds |v spoompiey iv SpoompiJey jelosouwoou0N| SPOOMPJeY |BINJBWWOD 19410 uui3 s}e0 pas 10410 yeO pes WBYWON eo OUUM Assoyo 9e1g uedsy YSe SIUAA yooe, AJO SIH yosig sedeg Yyosig J2@8MS Ydsiq MO}OA ejdew seBns ejdew pey SPOOMJJOS |IVV SPOOMIYOS J9UIO yoojweH ould ou auld Yyo3ld euld pey jyjeonsds seioeds 0L0'L8 €69'€7 LOL‘8L 989'S LLE'e9 SOL‘L 6EL'E LLO‘6L tCL'Ov S06'08 878'8L eS7'vL 96S'r L£S0'%9 9Z0'L 6LO'E z09'8L o9e'6e 697 LSO‘L SL6 gel 86G'L O ZSL LZZ OL9 6SZL'L S8v €07 c8C vLe'l O O Sev 68 LOv Sev Sev 0 ge ce) 0 0 9 98S'7 S18 OeZL vs LLL'E 08 cg S6L‘L Ovr'z z7S8'Z €69'L 669 £66 6SL'9 eZ Loe 6rP'l 9EE'D vez'e 906'L ZET'L €Z9 BLE'L eel 89l SZl L68 LZ6'L 989 S9S Lol GEC'L fe) Lv 8L~ LLL cS Lee 6OL SLL G6 0 0 ie) S6c LLS‘7 LLO‘L LZE Lv9 s9c'L O €6 88 yse'l LO6’e 88 sos “LL OzO'e 0 98 80L sss'L 9tb'L OOoL ool te) 9ze'L (6) vS LQ LLo‘L crys 60E'L S6L‘L Ell Cell SLL 0 f6L Ste 89'S 00s‘ lL 6SL'L ove 8EL'p ee €8 807'L vLs'z LSe'p vOL'L vOL'L oO Lvc'e 62 86 988'L vSL'L $90'r 6L0'L Sel vSEe L86'7 0 66L e6s'l vEL'L OEs‘ee LLS'v vLE'e c99 €S6'87 €9S ZSBL'L LvO's LOL‘6L S9L'9 Sv8'b gss’e O66 oze'L 62 OcL 60 e994 €s9 oo€e S9z ge €Ge 0 ce) 89 S8e eLs't 888 9SZ cel S89 6C v9 94 9Le Lee’e 6y0'E L977 882 C8 .e) SS s9 col 8vL srl ELL Sse 0 0 Oo O ie) vel vel vel 0 ce) ce) Oo Oo 0 Lee Lee Lee te) ce) te) 0 0 0 ——— ee do} do} do} do} do} 9Ai| Ino $90J} peep ue 401g 108}uU} EY | pesg us x01g 30eB}uU| ON Iv JBJOL J210 1, peeq 8Ar] (Sees) JO Spuesnoy} U}) S861 ‘puejbuy MeN UJeyINOS ‘ssejd UONIPUOD pue saldeds Aq puejsequ!} UO SelIAed PeAJEsqo YIM ("Y'q’P SEYyoU! +0'G) S903 JO JBqWINN “EZ eIGeL 44 €SZL'vé6 97L'bS LS9'L L86'v 880'8b LZ0'Ov £76 eze'e L8ZL‘SE soloeds jy oOsl‘Z9 vOe'Or vEL'L L6S'€ 6LS‘SE 948'97 L419 L6S'2 799°E€7 Spoompiey |iV¥ s96'€ 819'~ LZ 912 oee'Z Lve'l 0) 0 Lre'l SPOOMPpJeY /B!DJOWIWUOOUON LEE €v6 0) 99 £48 vs Zs OL L£S9 SPOOMPJeY [BIDJOUIWOS 4J0UIO LUZ'L Z6Z bl 867 Stv Oty O 68 Lee wij3 v69'S ELe'l 0) cel L8Z'L L8Z’€ 96 ely Cece SHeO pes 49410 Svl'L Ssl'z 69 98L 00S'z O066'v OL~ 6SS L22'v 480 pes UJOYLION ELle’te ELL'Z LOL LLZ lyL'9 008'v 60L SOV 977'b WeO BLUM pLL’e €€l'z 0 col LZ6'L LvO'L ie) ZeL vO6 Auseyo yoe1g L£80'% PLe'L 0 69 Sv0'l €L6 10] BLL sss uedsy €97'€ ZEL'L Oo €9 699'L Les‘L 10) QL sse'L Yyse O1lUM pSr'l 867'L 91 sse L6Z SSL SZ LEL Oo 49009 62S LSE 0 ee ZLe 6c 0 0 6727 Aso491H 96L'7 ys0'z Oo 8Ll S96'L Elz 92 £02 vsy youlg sedeg 6L9'€ LSe'z Le 9vE LL6'L L97'L 6€ SZL ZOL'L YddIg 128MS S67'7 OZ L'Z og 902 pss'l SZL 0 ie) SZL Yosiq MO}j9A Lte't sos’L SZL 61% L9p'L €cs ss 0 L9v ajdew seBns 7ZE'EL SLL'6 LOv LO6 L£98°L Lvl'v 0 Ls 990'v ejdew pey €LS'L7 ctp'vl ZS 96e'L 60S‘ZL LSL’EL 90€ 972 6LL‘ZL SPOOMYJOS IV sZ8'l £06 0 ie) LO6 696 0 OLL €S8 SPOOMYOS 10410 SLO’v tv9'7 Lvl LLZ v7z'z €Z6'l Zel cE vLSs'L yOO|W9aH Le6'Sl St6'9 SLE 602 LL6'S L66'8 eLL eSc Le9'8 auld a114M v6e'z L90'Z 0 6SL Z06'L eee ie) se 8672 auld Yyo3id LOP 8re co) 0 8ve ell 0 0 Ell euld poy S67'7 67S'L ss 9S2 EVE 992 zs Oo 602 4yjeonids 1830) +SL 6 vl 6 OL Je30} +SL 6 vl 6 OL sOnUL “O'S sOuDL “O'S $99J} Iv (QYyBiey yseosg ye seyoul) QyBiey Yseelg ye Seyoul) SSBIO JO}OWeIG SSPID JOJOWIG se1iseds do} us 401g do} yeu (Seedj Jo Spuesnoy} uj) S86L ‘pue|buy MeN UeYyINOS ‘ssejo JoJOWeIpP pue ‘ssejo UONIPUOD ‘seloeds Aq pueyequuil UO see} peep Bulpuejs jo sequNN “pz e/qeL 45 Tree class oe << All tive Dead, intact top Dead, broken top All dead All trees 10 20 Percent of trees with cavities Figure 16.--Percentage of trees on timberland with observed cavities by tree class and species group, Southern New England, 1985. Eastern hemlock (5) ug Northern red oak (8) Growling stock White oak (12) Standing dead : Red maple (13) White pine (16) Proportion by Number by specles tree class Cmi i ttons) Figure 17.--Proportion of trees on timberland by tree class and number of standing-dead trees by principal species, Southern New England, 1985. 46 Size class Cacres) Timber land area Cthousands of acres) Number of ownership units Ctnousands) Figure 18.--Number of private timberland ownership units and acres of timberland owned by size of ownership class, Southern New England, 1985. The pattern of forest ownership between 1972 and 1985 has been one of fragmentation of large ownerships. Ownerships of less than 10 acres make up the majority in 1972 (Kingsley 1976), and their numbers have increased by 164 percent between forest surveys (Fig. 19). The timberland area in ownerships of less than 10 acres has increased by 62 percent between surveys but at the expense of ownerships between 20 and 500 acres, which have decreased in area and numbers of owners. For all forest owners, the average forest ownership is calculated to have been 21.5 acres from the 1972 forest survey; that figure has fallen to 10.3 acres as of the 1985 forest survey. This trend is not likely to change as the age of the majority of private forest owners continues to be over 50 years (Kingsley 1976). There is an increased likelihood that these forest lands will be changing ownership through the estate and probate process and so be exposed to subdivision. This fragmentation of forest ownerships creates management issues, whether managing for wood products, wildlife, or other resources. The first issue is whether or not management is desired by the owner. Owners of 10 or 20 acres probably are less motivated toward active management for any resource and more inclined to simply enjoy or take for granted the forest land they own. If management is desired, small-area ownerships create problems in application of management. One’s management choices are greatly restricted when working with only several acres. For either wood products or wildlife, low-intensity, single-tree or group-selection regeneration methods are most appropriate. 47 Size class Cacres) 100 200 Number of ownership units Cthousands) Size class Cacres) 200 400 600 800 Timber land area Cthousands of acres) Figure 19.--Number of private timberland ownership units and timberland area by size of ownership class, Southern New England, 1972 and 1985. 48 Management Opportunities The growing preponderance of timberland acreage in sawtimber-size stands and the declining numbers of smaller diameter trees is an indication that Southern New England forests are maturing and that younger forests are not being created. Over the decade prior to the last forest survey, 23 percent of timberland acres had evidence of some timber harvest (Table 25). However, only 7 percent of these harvested acres were clearcut and the remaining acres were only partially cut. It is unlikely that these harvesting patterns will result in an early successional stand critical to the establishment of a particular tree species (for example, the number of aspen saplings declined from an estimated 28.6 million trees in 1972 to 17 million in 1985) and to the continued abundance of certain wildlife species in Southern New England. At the time of the most recent forest survey, it was estimated that 57 percent of timberland was in a condition such that no silvicultural treatment was recommended (Table 26). however, this determination was qualified in that the recommended treatment must be commercially viable, that is, must pay for itself, which precludes precommercial thinning. Management recommendations for the remaining timberland ranged from intermediate treatments such as precommercial and commercial thinning to regeneration harvests. It also is estimated that there are no equipment limitations that would impede typical timber harvesting operations on more than 75 percent of Southern New England timberland (Table 27). Future of Forest Resources of Southern New England The results of the inventories from Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island provide the reader with a snapshot of the forest resource situation in 1972 and 1985. While no specific future modeling or trend analysis has been undertaken, we can envision to some extent what the forest resource might be like in the future. The overall forest land area did not change considerably between the two surveys. Indirect indications are that there was fragmentation of forest land due to an increase in the number of forest owners. This subdivision of forest land probably is closely linked to the general economy of the region, and is driven by land values and housing starts. Unless the economy of New England changes dramatically, development of forest land provably will continue but at a lesser rate than that experienced during the boom of the 1980's. Forest ownership surveys indicate, however, that more than 50 percent of nonindustrial private landowners are more than 50 years old. As these owners continue to age, and eventually die, their land can be expected to go through inheritance proceedings, and possibly be subdivided to pay for the high costs of estate taxes. The judicious application of conservation easements to nonindustrial private forest land can minimize the value of the land, and thus soften the tax burden both annually and as part of an estate. There are more than 200 nonprofit land trusts throughout the region capable of assisting landowners with the development of conservation easements. 49 Table 25. Area of timberland by stand history class and time since harvest, Southern New England, 1985 (In thousands of acres) Time since harvest Stand history All class No harvest Harvest within Harvest 3-10 classes recently last 3 years years before No harvesting 3,923.9 0 .0 3,923.9 Clearcut .O 42.2 35.1 77.3 Partial cut 0 490.1 587.1 1,077.2 All classes 3,923.9 532.3 622.2 5,078.4 Table 26. Area of timberland by timber management class and state, Southern New England, 1985 (In thousands of acres) State Timber management ee ——————————————EEEE———EE All class Connecticut Massachusetts Rhode Island states Impractical to manage 133.3 298.8 41.3 473.4 Remove and regenerate 28.4 46.9 8.2 83.5 Precommercial treatment 17.8 43.9 .O 61.7 Type conversion 24.9 0 .0 24.9 Sanitation and salvage 48.0 14.6 41.6 104.2 Improvement cut 152.8 530.2 .0 683.0 Commercial thinning 131.5 35.2 36.4 203.1 Harvest 268.4 246.1 13.4 527.9 No treatment 972.2 1,713.7 230.8 2,916.7 All classes 1,777.3 2,929.4 371.7 5,078.4 Table 27. Area of timberland by equipment limitation class and state, Southern New England, 1985 (In thousands of acres) Equipment State limitation All class Connecticut Massachusetts Rhode Island states None 1,107.3 2,501.7 233.4 3,842.4 Slight 495.9 389.6 102.6 988.1 Moderate 145.7 23.4 29.4 198.5 Severe 28.4 14.7 6.3 49.4 All classes 1,777.3 2,929.4 371.7 5,078.4 50 The area of timberland probably will remain approximately the same, and the volume of wood will continue to increase. Growth exceeded removals by a factor to 3 to 1 from 1972 to 1984 (Table 14), resulting in a tremendous accumulation of wood in the forest. This increase in wood volume has not been significantly utilized through timber harvesting; only 23 percent of timberland is estimated to have been harvested in any fashion over the period (Table 25). Of the harvested forest, 93 percent were only partially cut and the remainder clearcut. In general, there has been only a small impact of harvesting on timberland both in extent and intensity. Fifteen percent of timberland was classified as warranting a regeneration or other harvest and an additional 19 percent would benefit from an intermediate treatment (Table 26). Based on these findings, it can be safely assumed that active silvicultural treatments will not be imposed on the majority of the region’s timberland over the near future and, hence, growth will continue to exceed removals by a considerable margin. Landowner attitudes play a significant role in determining the fate of forest land. The forest ownership survey indicates that 32 percent of owners believed they would never permit harvesting on their property. Individuals with this attitude own 17 percent of the forest land. Another 36 percent who believed they would schedule a timber harvest sometime within the next 10 years own 61 percent of the timberland base. A final 32 percent who were uncertain about plans to harvest own the remaining 22 percent of the forest. In general, it can be concluded that only a minority of forest land owners holding an even smaller portion of forest are opposed to any form of harvesting. This information indicates that timber harvesting is a viable management alternative as the region’s forests reach silvicultural maturity. Economic research has indicated that landowners are more likely to have their timber harvested when the stumpage price increases (Binkley 1981). A decrease in the supply of timber in the Pacific Northwest may translate into an increased demand for northeastern timber. Additionally, as timber volume of commercially important species increases in the more valuable grades, stumpage prices will increase along with an increase in owner incentive for harvesting. The survey results show fewer trees in the smaller diameter classes and fewer acres of timberland in the seedling sapling-size class. In the probable event that harvesting levels of regional timber remain roughly equivalent to current levels, and harvesting practices do not change appreciably, the number and acres of smaller trees will decrease further. At the regional scale, this trend probably will have a significant impact on wildlife habitat. Species requiring early successional habitats will most likely decline in numbers as their required habitat decreases in extent. In general, the period until the next survey probably will not be one of major change for the Southern New England forest. Forest area will change little but forest ownership patterns will continue to change and volumes will continue to increase, though perhaps at a slower pace as the forest continues to mature. 51 Conclusion Definitions of Terms The forest resources of Southern New England are clearly a vital part of the landscape of the region. Despite recent significant population growth and its related industrial, commercial, and residential development, the area remains predominantly forested. Due to past land use practices and abandonment, these forests are generally even-aged, and predominantly characterized by trees in the sawtimber-size class. Repeated forest surveys indicate impressive growth rates of the timber resource, and such growth exceeding removals by a factor of 3 to 1. On the basis of area, volume, and growth estimates from several survey periods, it appears that the forest remains a predominant factor in the overall landscape and is even increasing in volume and value. Residents of Southern New England enjoy impressive direct and indirect benefits from the forest, including timber and fuelwood, outdoor recreational opportunites, attractive landscapes, and habitat for wildlife. The Southern New England forest is not without problems. While not shrinking in size and actually growing in volume, this resource is increasingly fragmented by development and subdevelopment of private forest ownerships. Since most of the region’s forest is owned by private individuals, this trend will likely continue. Increased fragmentation of ownerships ultimately will result in increased fragmentation of forest land, with an impaired ability to commercially produce timber and a decline in both recreational opportunities and the quality of wildlife habitat. Accretion. The estimated net growth on growing-stock trees that are measured during the previous inventory, divided by the number of growing seasons between surveys. It does not include the growth on trees that were cut during the period, nor those trees that died. Aagricultural/herbaceous land. Land with herbaceous plant cover, both grasses and/or forbs, including cropland, pasture land, and natural grass lands. Aquatic edge. An edge condition created when a terrestrial land use abuts a lake, pond, river, stream, or major wetland. Board foot. A unit of lumber measurement 1 foot long, 1 foot wide, and 1 inch thick, or its equivalent. Browse. Forage resource; defined here as current twig growth of woody-stemmed plants occurring between 1 and 8 feet in height. Cavity. A hollowed out space in a tree, either natural or faunal caused; frequently used as a nesting site or temporary refuge by many species of wildlife. Commercial species. Tree species presently or prospectively suitable for industrial wood products. Excludes species of typically small size, poor form, or inferior quality, such as hawthorn or sumac. Condition class. Classification of trees based on live or dead and condition of top of the tree (intact, broken, or dead). Cord. See Standard Cord. 52 Cropland. Land that currently supports agricultural crops including silage and feed grains, bare farm fields resulting from cultivation or harvest, and maintained orchards. Cull tree. A rotten or rough tree. See Rotten tree and Rough tree. Cull increment. The net volume of growing-stock trees in the previous inventory that became rough or rotten trees in the current inventory, divided by the number of growing seasons between surveys. Cultural land. Land with human development as the major land cover; includes industrial, commercial, and residential land uses. Diameter at breast height (d.b.h.). The diameter outside bark of a standing tree measured at 4.5 feet above the ground. Forest land. The total of timberland and all noncommercia! forest land (productive reserved forest land and woodland). Includes land that is at least 10 percent stocked with trees of any size, or that formerly had such tree cover and is not currently developed for a nonforest use. The minimum area for classification of forest land is 1 acre. Forest type. A classification of forest land based on the species that form a plurality of live tree basal area stocking. Forest-type group. A combination of forest types that share closely associated species or site requirements. The many forest types in Southern New England were combined into the following major forest-type groups (the descriptions apply to forests in Southern New England): a. White/red pine--forests in which white pine, hemlock, or red pine make up the plurality of the stocking, singly or in combination; common associates include red spruce, maple, and yellow-poplar. b. Spruce/fir--forests in which red spruce, northern white-cedar, balsam fir, white spruce, black spruce, or tamarack, singly or in combination, make up a plurality of the stocking; common associates include yellow birch and red maple. c. Hard pine--forest in which loblolly, shortleaf, or other southern yellow pines (except longleaf or slash pine), or pitch pine in New England, singly or in combination, comprise a plurality of the stocking; common associates include hickory and maple. d. Oak/pine--forests in which northern red oak or white ash, singly or in combination, make up a plurality of the stocking but where pines or eastern redcedar contribute 25 to 50 percent of the stocking; hemlock, maple, sweet birch, and yellow-poplar are associates. e. Oak/hickory--forests in which upland oaks, red maple (when associated with central hardwoods), or hawthorn, singly or in combination, make up a plurality of the stocking and in which white pine makes up less than 25 percent of the stocking; common 53 associates include hard pines, hemlock, maple, birch, hickory, and yellow-poplar. f. Elm/ash/red maple--forests in which black ash, elm, red maple (when growing on wet sites), willow, or green ash, singly or in combination, make up a plurality of the stocking; common associates include sugar maple, hickory, yellow-poplar, and black cherry. g. Northern hardwoods--forests in which sugar maple, beech, yellow birch, red maple (when associated with northern hardwoods), pin cherry, or black cherry, singly or in combination, make up a plurality of the stocking; common associates include hard pines, hemlock, hickory, ash, and yellow-poplar. h. Aspen/birch--forests in which aspen, paper birch, or gray birch, singly or in combination, make up a plurality of the stocking. Fuelwood. Round, split, or chipped woody material (with or without bark) that is converted to household, commercial, or industrial energy. Green weight. The weight of wood and bark as it would be if it had been recently cut. It is usually expressed in pounds or tons. Gross growth. The sum of accretion and ingrowth. Growing-stock trees. Live trees of commercial species classified as sawtimber, poletimber, saplings, or seedlings; that is, all live trees of commercial species except rough and rotten trees. Growing-stock volume. Net volume, in cubic feet, of growing-stock trees 5.0 inches d.b.h. and larger from a 1-foot stump to a minimum 4.0-inch top diameter outside bark of the central stem, or to the point where the central stem breaks into limbs. Net volume equals gross volume, less deduction for cull. Hardwoods. Dicotyledonous trees, usually broad-leaved and deciduous. Harvested cropland. All land from which crops were harvested or hay was cut, all land in orchards, citrus groves, and vineyards, and nursery and greenhouse products. Importance value. Average of relative density and relative frequency of a species. ingrowth. The estimated net volume of growing-stock trees that became 5.0 inches d.b.h. or larger during the period between inventories, divided by the number of growing seasons between surveys. International 1/4-inch rule. A log rule or formula for estimating the board-foot volume of logs. The mathematical formula is: (0.22D? - 0.71D)(0.904762) 54 for 4-foot sections, where D =diameter inside bark at the small end of the log section. This rule is used as the USDA Forest Service standard log rule in the Eastern United States. Land area. (a) Bureau of Census: The area of dry land and land temporarily or partly covered by water, such as marshes, swamps, and river flood plains; streams, sloughs, estuaries, and canals less than 1/8 statute mile wide; and lakes, reservoirs, and ponds less than 40 acres in area. (b) Forest Inventory and Analysis: same as (a) except that the minimum width of streams, etc., is 120 feet, and the minimum size of lakes, etc., is 1 acre. Land-use edge. A condition created by the juxtaposition of two different land uses. Mast. Seed produced by woody-stemmed perennial plants; generally refers to soft (fruit) and hard (nuts) mast. Mortality. The estimated net volume of growing-stock trees at the previous inventory that died from natural causes before the current inventory, divided by the number of growing seasons between surveys. Net change. The difference between the current and previous inventory estimates of growing-stock volume, divided by the number of growing seasons between surveys. Components of net change are ingrowth plus accretion, minus mortality, minus cull increment, minus removals. Net green weight. The green weight of woody material less the weight of all unsound (rotten) material. Net growth. The change, resulting from natural causes, in growing-stock volume during the period between surveys, divided by the number of growing seasons. Components of net growth are ingrowth plus accretion, minus mortality, minus cull increment. Noncommercial forest land. Productive reserved forest land and woodland. Noncommercial species. Tree species of typically small size, poor form, or inferior quality that normally do not develop into trees suitable for industrial wood products. Nonforest land. Land that has never supported forests, or land formerly forested but now in nonforest use such as cropland, pasture, residential areas, or highways. Nonsalvable dead tree. A dead tree with most or all of its bark missing that is at least 5.0 inches in d.b.h. and is at least 4.5 feet tall. Nonstocked area. A stand-size class of forest land that is stocked with less than 10 percent of minimum full stocking with all live trees. Other cropland. Includes cropland used for cover crops and soil improvement (legumes). 55 Pasture land. Includes any pasture land other than cropland and woodland pasture. Can include lands that had lime fertilizer or seed applied or that had been improved by irrigation, drainage, or control of weeds and brush. Pastured cropland. Includes rotation pasture and grazing land that would have been used for crops without additional improvement. Poletimber stand. A stand-size class of forest land that is stocked with at least 10 percent of minimum full stocking with all-live trees with half or more of such stocking in poletimber or sawtimber trees or both, and in which the stocking of poletimber exceeds that of sawtimber. Poletimber_ trees. Live trees of commercial species meeting regional specifications of soundness and form and at least 5.0 inches d.b.h., but smaller than sawtimber trees. Productive reserved forest land. Forest land sufficiently productive to qualify as timberland, but withdrawn from timber utilization through statute, or administrative designation; land exclusively used for Christmas tree production. Relative density. Number of individuals of a given species as a percentage of the total of all species. Relative frequency. Frequency of a given species as a percentage of the total of all frequencies (Frequency is the total number of plots where a given species occurs divided by the total number of plots). Removals. The net growing-stock volume harvested or killed in logging, cultural operations (such as timber stand improvement) or land clearing, and also the net growing-stock volume neither harvested nor killed but growing on land that was reclassified from timberland to noncommercial forest land or nonforest land during the period between surveys. This volume is divided by the number of growing seasons. Rights-of-way. Highways, pipelines, powerlines, canals. Rotten tree. A live tree of commercial species that does not contain at least one 12-foot sawlog or two noncontiguous sawlogs, each 8 feet or longer, now or prospectively, and does not meet regional specifications for freedom from defect primarily because of rot; that is, more than 50 percent of the cull volume in the tree is rotten. Rough tree. (a) The same as a rotten tree except that a rough tree does not meet regional specifications for freedom from defect primarily because of roughness or poor form; also (b) a live tree of noncommercial species. Salvable dead trees. A tree at least 5.0 inches in d.b.h. that has recently died and still has fairly tight bark. The tree may be standing, fallen, windthrown, knocked down, or broken off. Sampling error. A measure of the reliability of an estimate, generally called the coefficient of variation, and expressed as a percentage of an estimate. The sampling errors given in this report correspond to one standard deviation and 56 are calculated as the square root of the variance, divided by the estimate, and multiplied by 100. Saplings. Live trees 1.0 inch through 4.9 inches d.b.h. Sapling-seedling stand. A stand-size class of forest land that is stocked with at least 10 percent of minimum full stocking with all live trees with half or more of such stocking in saplings or seedlings or both. Sawlog. A log meeting regional standards of diameter, length, and freedom from defect, including a minimum 8-foot length and a minimum diameter inside bark of 6 inches for softwoods and 8 inches for hardwoods. (See specifications under Log Grade Classification.) Sawlog portion. That part of the bole of a sawtimber tree between the stump and the sawlog top; that is, the merchantable height. Sawlog top. The point on the bole of a sawtimber tree above which a sawlog cannot be produced. The minimum sawlog top is 7.0 inches diameter outside bark (d.o.b.) for softwoods and 9.0 inches d.o.b. for hardwoods. Sawtimber stand. A stand-size class of forest land that is stocked with at least 10 percent of minimum full stocking with all-live trees with half or more of such stocking in poletimber or sawtimber trees or both, and in which the stocking of sawtimber is at least equal to that of poletimber. Sawtimber trees. Live trees of commercial species at least 9.0 inches d.b.h. for softwoods or 11.0 inches for. hardwoods, containing at least one 12-foot sawlog or two noncontiguous 8-foot sawlogs, and meeting regional specifications for freedom from defect. Sawtimber volume. Net volume in board feet, by the International 1/4-inch rule, of sawlogs in sawtimber trees. Net volume equals gross volume less deductions for rot, sweep, and other defects that affect use for lumber. Seedlings. Live trees less than 1.0-inch d.b.h. and at least 1 foot tall. Shrub. Woody-stemmed perennial plant, generally with no well-defined main stem and less than 12 feet tall at maturity; defined by species. Snag. Standing dead tree, with most or all of its bark missing that is at least 5.0 inches in d.b.h. and at least 4.5 feet tall (does not include salvable dead). Softwoods. Coniferous trees, usually evergreen and having needles or scalelike leaves. Species frequency. Number of plots where a given species occurs expressed as a percentage of the total number of plots. Stand. A group of forest trees growing on forest land. Stand-size class. A classification of forest land based on the size class (that is, seedlings, saplings, poletimber or sawtimber) of all-live trees in the area. 57 Standard cord. A unit of measure for stacked bolts of wood, encompassing 128 cubic feet of wood, bark, and air space. Standard-lumber log grade. A classification of sawtimber quality based on standard sawlog grades for hardwoods, white pine, and Southern pine. (Note: Red pine was graded using southern pine guidelines.) All specifications are shown under Log-Grade Classification.) Stocking. The degree of occupancy of land by trees, measured by basal area and/or number of trees in a stand compared to the basal area and/or number of trees required to fully use the growth potential of the land (or the stocking standard). In the Eastern United States this standard is 75 square feet of basal area per acre for trees 5.0 inches d.b.h. and larger, or its equivalent in numbers of trees per acre for seedlings and saplings. Two categories of stocking are used in this report: all-live trees and growing-stock trees. The relationships between the classes and the percentage of the stocking standard are: nonstocked = O to 9, poorly stocked = 10 to 59, moderately stocked = 60 to 99, fully stocked = 100 to 129, and overstocked = 130 to 160. Stump. The main stem of a tree from ground level to 1 foot above ground level, including the wood and bark. Timberland. Forest land producing or capable of producing crops of industrial wood (more than 20 cubic feet per acre per year) and not withdrawn from timber utilization. Formerly known as commercial forest land. Top. The wood and bark of a tree above the merchantable height (or above the point on the stem 4.0 inches in diameter outside bark). Generally includes the uppermost stem, branches, and twigs of the tree, but not the foliage. Transportation right-of-way. Land associated with highways and railroads. Tree class. A classification of the quality or condition of trees for sawlog production. Tree class for sawtimber trees is based on their present condition. Tree class for poletimber trees is a prospective determination--a forecast of their potential quality when they reach sawtimber size (11.0 inches d.b.h. for hardwoods, 9.0 inches d.b.h. for softwoods). Tree grade. A classification of sawtimber quality based on guidelines for tree grades for hardwoods, white pine, and Southern pine. (Note: Red pine was graded using southern pine guidelines. All specifications are shown under Tree-Grade Classification.) Trees. Woody plants that have well-developed stems and are usually more than 12 feet tall at maturity. Unproductive forest land. Forest land that is incapable of producing 20 cubic feet per acre per year of industrial wood under natural conditions due to adverse site conditions. 58 Literature Cited Upper-stem portion. That part of the main stem or fork of a sawtimber tree above the sawlog top to a diameter of 4.0 inches outside bark, or to the point where the main stem or fork breaks into limbs. Urban forest land. Noncommercial forest land within urban areas that is completely surrounded by or nearly surrounded by urban development (not parks), whether commercial, industrial, or residential. Utility right-of-way. Land associated with pipeline and electric transmission lines; identified only if vegetative cover differs from adjacent land use. Windbreak/hedgerow. Linear areas, less than 120 feet in wide, with predominantly tree and/or shrub vegetation. Arner, Stanford L.; Gansner, David A.; Birch, Thomas W. 1990. Rate of value change in New England timber stands. Res. Pap. NE-639. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 4 p. Atwood, Sanford S., chairman. 1970. Land use and wildlife resources. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Agricultural Land Use and Wildlife Resources. 262 p. Binkley, Clark S. 1991. Timber supply from non-industrial forests. Bulletin no. 92. New Haven, CT: Yale School of Forestry. 97 p. Brooks, Robert T. 1989. Status and trends of raptor habitat in the Northeast. In: Proceedings, northeast raptor management symposium and workshop; 1988 May 16-18; Syracuse, NY. Natl. Wildl. Fed. Sci. Tech. Ser. No. 13. Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation, Institute for Wildlife Research: 123-132. Brooks, Robert T. 1990. State-of-the-art methodology of forest inventory: wildlife habitat assessment in the northeastern United States. In: Proceedings, state-of-the-art methodology of forest inventory: a symposium; 1989, July 30-August 5; Syracuse, NY. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-263. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: 538-543. Brooks, Robert T.; Birch, Thomas W. 1988. Changes in New England forests and forest owners: implications for wildlife habitat resources and management. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natura! Resources Conference. 53:78-87. Brooks, Robert T.; Frieswyk, Thomas F.; Ritter, Arthur. 1986. Forest wildlife habitat statistics for Maine-1982. Resour. Bull. NE-96. Broomall, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 146 p. Brooks, Robert T.; Sykes, Karen J. 1984. Sampling land use edge from aerial photographs--line transect vs. circular pattern. Res. Note NE-321. Broomall! 59 PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 6 p. Burns, Barbara A.; Houston, David R. 1987. Managing beech bark disease. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. 4: 28-32. Connecticut Department of Economic Development. 1991. Connecticut market data 1990-1991. Rocky Hill, CT: Connecticut Department of Economic Development, Policy, Planning, and Research Division. 87 p. Cronon, William. 1983. Changes in the land: Indians, colonists, and the ecology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang. 241 p. DeGraaf, Richard M.; Rudis, Deborah D. 1986 New England wildlife: habitat, natural history, and distribution. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-108. Broomall, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 491 p. Dickson, David R.; Bowers, Teresa M. 1986. Forest statistics for Connecticut. Resour. Bull. NE-44. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 40 p. Dickson, David R., McAfee, Carol L. 1988a. Forest statistics for Connecticut-1972 and 1985. Resour. Bull. NE-105. Broomall, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 102 p. Dickson, David R.; McAfee, Carol L. 1988b. Forest statistics for Rhode Island-- 1972 and 1985. Resour. Bull. NE-104. Broomall, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 96 p. Dickson, David R.; McAfee, Carol L. 1988c. Forest statistics for Massachusetts--1972 and 1985. Resour. Bull. NE-106. Broomall, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 112 p. Ferguson, Roland H.; Howard, Milford C. 1956. The timber resources in Massachusetts. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 44 p. Ferguson, Roland H.; McGuire, John R. 1957. The timber resources of Rhode Island. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 38 p. Gansner, David A.; Arner, Stanford L.; Birch, Thomas W. 1990. Timber value growth rates in New England. Res. Pap. NE-632. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 14 p. Gill, John D.; Healy, William M. 1974. A handbook on shrubs and vines. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-9. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 180 p. 60 Greenbaum, D. S.; O'Donnell, A. 1987. Losing ground: the case for land conservation in Massachusetts. Lincoln, MA: Massachusetts. Audubon Society. 34 p. Griswold, Norman B.; Ferguson, Roland H. 1957. The timber resources of Connecticut. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 36 p. Healy, William M.; Brooks, Robert T.; DeGraaf, Richard M. 1989. Cavity trees in sawtimber-size oak stands in central Massachusetts. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 6: 61-65. Kingsley, Neal P. 1974. The timber resources of Southern New England. Resour. Bull. NE-36. Broomall, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 50 p. Kingsley, Neal P. 1976. The forest-land owners of Southern New England. Resour. Bull. NE-41. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 27 p. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States Trees (native and naturalized). Agric. Handb. 541. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 375 p. Millar, Scott. 1984. Rhode Island forest resources management plan. Rep. No. 45. Providence, Rl: Rhode Island Office of State Planning and Division of Forest Environment. More, Muriel E. 1985. Massachusetts forest resources--a working guide to action. Amherst, MA: Division of Forests and Parks, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. 112 p. Nevel, Robert L.; Wharton, Eric H. 1988. The timber industries of Southern New England-a periodic assessment of timber output. Resour. Bull. NE-101. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 28 p. Peters, John R.; Bowers, Teresa M. 1977a. Forest statistics for Massachusetts. Resour. Bull. NE-48. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 43 p. Peters, John R.; Bowers, Teresa M. 1977b. Forest statistics for Rhode Island. Resour. Bull. NE-49. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 38 p. Spurr, Stephen H.; Barnes, Burton V. 1980. Forest Ecology, 3rd edition. John Wiley & Sons, N.Y. 687 p. Smith, David M. 1986. The practice of silviculture, 8th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 527 p. 61 U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1987. Statistical abstract of the United States: 1988, 108th ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 943p. 62 Tree, Shrub, and Vine Species of Southern New England as Encountered on Field Plots) Common name Balsam fir Atlantic white-cedar Eastern redcedar Tamarack (native) Norway spruce Red spruce Red pine Pitch pine Eastern white pine Scotch pine Northern white-cedar Eastern hemlock Boxelder? Striped maple? Red maple Silver maple Sugar maple Mountain maple? Ailanthus? Serviceberry species” Yellow birch Sweet birch Paper birch Gray birch? American hornbeam? Hickory species Bitternut hickory Pignut hickory Shagbark hickory Mockernut hickory American chestnut? Flowering dogwood? Hawthorn species? American beech White ash Black ash Green ash Butternut Yellow-poplar Apple species? Black tupelo Eastern hophornbeam? Scientific name’ SOFTWOOD TREES Abies balsamea Chamaecyparis thyoides Juniperus virginiana Larix laricina Picea abies P. rubens Pinus resinosa P. rigida P. strobus P. sylvestris Thuja occidentalis Tsuga canadensis HARDWOOD TREES Acer negundo A. pensylvanicum A. rubrum A. saccharinum A. saccharum A. spicatum Ailanthus altissima Amelanchier sp. Betula alleghaniensis B. lenta B. papyrifera 8. populifolia Carpinus caroliniana Carya sp. C. cordiformis C. glabra C. ovata C. tomentosa Castanea dentata Cornus florida Crataegus sp. Fagus grandifolia Fraxinus americana F. nigra F. pennsylvanica Juglans cinerea Liriodendron tulipifera Malus sp. Nyssa Syivatica Ostrya virginiana 63 American sycamore Balsam poplar Eastern cottonwood Bigtooth aspen Quaking aspen Cherry Pin cherry? Black cherry Chokecherry? White oak Swamp white oak Scarlet oak Bear oak, scrub oak? Pin oak Chestnut oak Northern red oak Post oak Black oak Black locust Willow species? Sassafras? American mountain-ash? European mountain-ash? American basswood Elm species American elm Slippery elm Alder species Chokeberry species Azalea species Barberry species Sweetfern Alternate-leaved dogwood Silky dogwood Round-leaved dogwood Gray-stemmed/panicled dogwood Red-osier dogwood American hazelnut Beaked hazelnut Huckleberry species Witch-hazel Winterberry holly Common spicebush Honeysuckle species Ninebark Buckthorn species Smooth sumac Staghorn sumac Poison sumac Currant species Platanus occidentalis Populus balsamifera P. deltoides P. grandidentata P. tremuloides Prunus sp. P. pensylvanica P. serotina P. virginiana Quercus alba . bicolor . coccinea . Ilicifolia . palustris . prinus rubra . Stellata . velutina Robinia psuedoacacia Salix sp. Sassafras albidum Sorbus americana S. aucuparia Tilia americana Ulmus sp. U. americana U. rubra SOOORBSB880 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS Alnus sp. Aronia sp. Azalea sp. Berberis sp. Comptonia peregrina Cornus alternifolia C. amomum (obliqua) C. rugosa (circinata) C. racemosa (paniculata) C. stolonifera Corylus americana C. cornuta (rostrata) Gaylussacia sp. Hamamelis virginiana Nex verticillata Lindera benzoin Lonicera sp. Physocerpus opulifolius Rhamnus sp. Rhus glabra R. typhina R. vernix Ribes sp. 64 Rose species Brier, bramble species American elderberry Spirea species American bladdernut Blueberry species Viburnum species Maple-leaved viburnum Hobblebush viburnum Wild raisin Nannyberry Blackhaw Highbush cranberry Common juniper Sheep Issrel Mountain laurel Canadian bunchberry Creeping snowberry Teaberry Partridgeberry American bittersweet Clematis species Virginia creeper Poison ivy Greenbrier species Grape species ‘Names according to Little (1979). 2Noncommercial tree species. Rosa sp. Rubus sp. Sambucus canadensis Spirea sp. Staphylea trifolia Vaccinium sp. Viburnum sp. V. acerifolium V. alnifolium V. cassinoides V. lentago V. prunifolium V. trilobum EVERGREEN SHRUBS Juniperus communis Kalmia angustifolia K. latifolia DWARF SHRUBS Cornus canadensis Gaultheria hispidula G. procumbens Mitchella repens VINES Celastrus scandens Clematis sp. Parthenocissus quinquefolia Rhus radicans Smilax sp. Vitis sp. 65 Sampling Errors for Selected Estimates, Southern New England, 1972 and 1985 Timberland 1972 1985 classification estimate estimate RESTS pocreras Percent---------------- All timberland 1.3 0.9 Forest-type group White/red pine 9.9 8.1 Spruce/fir 56.6 43.9 Hard pine 30.5 212 Oak/pine 18.9 15.5 Oak/hickory 5.2 4.3 Elm/ash/red maple 26.0 16.0 Northern hardwoods 9.4 6.8 Aspen/birch 60.6 39.3 Stand-size class Sawtimber Poletimber Sapling/seedling , ODD (om) oo — 00 W on Go f-of Nonstocked : 66 Sampling Errors for Selected Estimates, Southern New England, 1972 and 1985 Volume Species and Number of trees Growing-stock _Sawtimber diameter class 1972 1985 1972 1985 1972 1985 SSS Percent------- soreecenncnnennonne POFCENt-——---———---—--——— Spruce/fir 43.2 37.6 55.0 30.2 Gis. "32-7 Red pine 34.5 46.4 48.4 51.9 56.8 54.3 Pitch pine 25.4 25.5 28.4 18.8 36.5 21.5 White pine 9.1 12.2 9.9 8.7 9.5 9.7 Hemlock 15.3 14.0 16.8 4 16:1 ° 42.4 Other softwoods 28.3 40.9 56.8 41.6 75:2 30.4 All softwoods 6.6 8.0 ey 6.2 7.4 Pp Red maple 5.8 6.9 8.3 5.5 13:2 7.5 Sugar maple 13.5 12:6 16.2 12.8 20:7 15.3 Yellow birch 16.5 16.6 UR AAr 4 13.1 25.4 18.4 Sweet birch 12.0 1221 15.3 10.9 19:6 ~13.1 Paper birch 17.9 19.0 UPS: 15.3 30.9 23.0 Hickory 14.2 15.2 17.9 ‘13 26:3 °45.1 Beech 17.9 19.9 ut 74 12.6 24.9 16.0 White ash 12.8 15.8 16.3 11.0 21.1 14.2 Aspen 17.5 27.1 24.2 17.5 39.8 21.9 Black cherry 14.5 16.9 20.1 1oc2 24.8 0.1 White oak 11.3 11.6 9.1 a4 11-0 9.7 Northern red oak 10.2 8.7 8.2 6.9 9.9 7.8 Other red oaks 10.5 9.7 10.1 6.3 12.0 7.5 Elm 19.4 39.0 22.9 21.9 44.1 36.2 Other hardwoods 25.5 19.0 16.7 12.8 22.7: 45.0 All hardwoods a2 aot a5 2.4 5.3 3.4 All species rT | 3.4 2.4 2a 3.5 = D.b.h. class (inches) 5.0to 6.9 4.0 3.0 5.3 3.4 7.0 to 8.9 3.8 2.9 4.3 = aa - - 9.0 to 10.9 3.9 3.0 4.1 x | 1.7 9.8 11.0 to 12.9 4.5 SL 4.3 3.3 5.1 BS 13.0 to 14.9 5.8 3.4 5.9 3.6 5.8 3.6 15.0 to 16.9 6.0 4.5 6.0 4.8 5.8 4.9 17.0 to 18.9 6.9 6.1 7.4 6.6 7.4 6.6 19.0 to 20.9 8.7 7.9 9.4 8.3 9.0 8.3 21.0 to 28.9 9.1 7.9 10.3 8.9 10.4 9.0 29.0+ iZ.2 16.9 22.3 22.8 22.5 22.2 67 List of Tables 10. titi: 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Land area by land class and state, southern New England, 1985, and published forest land area, Southern New England, 1953 and 1972 Cropland area by cropland type, census year, and state, Southern New England Total and rural population by census year and state, Southern New England. Index to land-use interspersion by type of land use or land cover and state, Southern New England, 1985 Area of timberland by forest-type group and stand-size class, Southern New England, 1972 Area of timberland by forest-type group and stand-size class, Southern New England, 1985 Area of timberland by all-live tree stocking class and state, Southern New England, 1972 and 1985 Number of live trees on timberland by species and diameter class, Southern New England, 1972 Number of live trees on timberland by species and diameter class, Southern New England, 1985 Net volume of growing-stock trees on timberland by species and diameter class, Southern New England, 1972 Net volume of growing-stock trees on timberland by species and diameter class, Southern New England, 1985 Net volume of all-live trees by class of timber and species group, Southern New England, 1972 Net volume of all-live trees by class of timber and species group, Southern New England, 1985 Average annual net change of growing-stock volume by components of growth and species group, Southern New England, 1957-71 and 1972-84 Net volume of sawtimber trees on timberland by species and diameter class, Southern New England, 1972 Net volume of sawtimber trees on timberland by species and diameter class, Southern New England, 1985 Net volume of sawtimber trees on timberland by species, size class, and standard-lumber log grade, Southern New England, 1972 Net volume of sawtimber trees on timberland by species, size class, and standard-lumber log grades, Southern New England, 1985 Net green weight of all trees on timberland by class of timber and species group, Southern 68 20. 21. 22: 23. 24, 25. 26. 27. New England, 1985 Number of seedlings, saplings, and shrubs on timberland by species and stand-size class, Southern New England, 1985 Relative density, relative frequency, importance value, and species frequency of lesser woody stems by species, Southern New England, 1985 Number of all-live nut- and fruit-producing trees on timberland by species and diameter class, Southern New England, 1985 Number of trees (5.0+ inches d.b.h.) with observed cavities on timberland by species and condition class, Southern New England, 1985 Number of standing-dead trees on timberland by species, condition class, and diameter class, Southern New England, 1985 Area of timberland by stand-history class and time since harvest, Southern New England, 1985 Area of timberland by timber-management class and state, Southern New England, 1985 Area of timberland by equipment-limitation class and state, Southern New England, 1985 69 Cross Reference of Southern New England and State Resource Tables Southern New England Report 1 2 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Land area by land class Cropland area by cropland type Total and rural human population Index to land-use interspersion Area of timberland by forest-type group and stand-size class, 1972 Area of timberland by forest-type group and stand-size class, 1985 Area of timberland by all-live tree stocking class, 1972 and 1985 Number of live trees by species and diameter class, 1972 Number of live trees by species and diameter class, 1985 Net volume of growing-stock trees by species and diameter class, 1972 Net volume of growing-stock trees by species and diameter class, 1985 Net volume of all live trees by class of timber and species group, 1972 Net volume of all live trees by class of timber and species group, 1985 Average annual net change of growing-stock volume by components of growth and species group Net volume of sawtimber trees by species and diameter class, 1972 Net volume of sawtimber trees by species and diameter class, 1985 Net volume of sawtimber trees by species, size class, and standard-lumber log grade, 1972 Net volume of sawtimber trees by species, size class, and standard-lumber log grade, 1985 Net green weight of all trees by class of timber and species 70 State Report 1 Not published Not published 76 2 11 and 12 Not published 16 38 39 Not published 30 45 41 42 43 44 29 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 group Number of seedlings, saplings, and shrubs by species and stand-size class Relative density, relative frequency, importance value, and species frequency of lesser woody stems by species Number of all live nut- and fruit-producing trees by species and diameter class Number of trees with observed cavities by species and condition class Number of standing-dead trees by species, condition class, and diameter class Area of timberland by stand-history class and time since harvest Area of timberland by timber-management class Area of timberland by equipment limitation class 71 24 In text 20 23 22 Not published Not published Not published hee id Loy eRe Byut i ; i iy pete " JONAL AGE wWuuuum nn 102 Brooks, Robert T.; Kittredge, David B.; Alerich, Carol L. 1993. Forest resources of southern New England. Resour. Bull. NE-127. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 71 p. An analytical report of the third forest inventory of the three southern New England states of Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island. Included is a discussion of forest area, number of trees, timber volume, tree biomass, timber value, forest wildlife habitat, ownership, manage- ment opportunities, and the future of forest resources in southern New England. Keywords: Forest survey, inventory, area, volume, biomass, wildlife habitat, ownership, management opportunities 9437 284 NATIONAL AGRI WIN | ! Headquarters of the Northeastern Forest Experiment Station is in Radnor, Penn- sylvania. Field laboratories are maintained at: Amherst, Massachusetts, in cooperation with the University of Massachusetts Burlington, Vermont, in cooperation with the University of Vermont Delaware, Ohio Durham, New Hampshire, in cooperation with the University of New Hampshire Hamden, Connecticut, in cooperation with Yale University Morgantown, West Virginia, in cooperation with West Virginia University Orono, Maine, in cooperation with the University of Maine Parsons, West Virginia Princeton, West Virginia Syracuse, New York, in cooperation with the State University of New York, College of Environmental Sciences and Forestry at Syracuse University University Park, Pennsylvania, in cooperation with The Pennsylvania State Uni- versity Warren, Pennsylvania Persons of any race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, or with any handicap- ping condition are welcome to use and enjoy all facilities, programs, and services of the USDA. Discrimination in any form is strictly against agency policy, and should be reported to the Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250. "Caring for the Land and Serving People Through Research"