VA rated Facade DAE a Bit Mi re iu - ‘ Dt - ate = th zi fr ) i ee ie Aue i nist iat Nhe ahs tts yy sth Ht ti isp Ay 1} sit ay \ atte ‘ aN + ive {iy at nit ¥ fer iii (1 cae Hut Hs Hea Nit bhatt cae ni ti ut Hebd a t Ht HraiitS mt Tat Hal Rite ghenst I isi ' a UetHt BSG ut if Na (¢ ri na i it nse He 22> rah Ue WET = x Sos es oe re yh wy Wh ery a TL itil weet UAT ETH bt es iN we ei r its vi in , iA i \ . a : i\ if wae eae are Pane aeledaaunese (Omye Lah E Hol Hey tN f Hi th * vintsed OSNACARTeR Aca p UES ye hac at estos Heth Hi hae ray teed td bel int wh te if) Visti iin RANCH i Mi Hains ith ni i an i! ] ” rarer Ml 4H it sates H H | ua aaa tit ‘ ' a a bol iN nM: pa) Hatabhepy ; Halts ea I Py iy Het oo a ni ia) OH H ” oh i aay } tH) a a ty Mity iit j ve tery HH Me yay) neh bed Paha t Ht; Ra) th sty 41 HI ithe Ghai Hf tt iy ie at iit hh Sa a if: is Haat tt Hi ce Meath Wi eat aM ¢ at RAL it Nya at ty bated if Hy Uy Ahi Sh! i M4 risen aye = » “as rhe ty i a hisiteintt he ~ ho aa rT by ete iy Ne ite cf tt shh Ay + artis ha Nive aie = Aan 2 een ae hi Mit Waypoints MH ere uf inn Hal Hela ia hat qed } AYN yihty, ity nn ate) Rit Nar H yan Mad uta titenresas i “ Aaah sate Halll aes hee Aut a ati ji hitti Mbiatal ta a a :! ul Hts! Li ea u PAA its Stet Ta ie tra bheetintdtearaataaetal wi slashes Hh Cane inal la aaa tind muti ‘4 Bye Dletasaen ise i saint i ia atria Patedeie dey: ir hal Ai dahil sh tytn if nity Ht Hits 1( it REN Beas iil ahi jaisttg ie RK Menta yh ate HU at nh Neh nit Soa ake RN i aii if, aN et 1 ih Wisi Ned ate, it Ws ennai Ha st RANT UTM atte Tina a Brida path ine a ee ia i inh a ini way wit jas bits Bi i nh ie fal eye hah Hau a a hi ( 4 Wet} , tat UMAEStAt 7 pitanen ttt Lr erat Mf {rib bya yhne ve Heaiy er At teil AUCH aT oy venuy eat mt A $v We telenetans \ ua Riis Pengedsreieg ys vs Paysite: 44 Acai ih ) LA) ie! TRE Ming ANUS is ait et itouN Mi we Pe liste " ae “ iit ia mi " ts Kh te rt sith Nt SRM ie! meth tegen ting eis ety ih ae bepanted iit (Ky IN aeils nt | | Waster si SPR Re Uae ie bit asad Mb ti HM FA by hy (he Ue via ee i ‘ail ia i ae ina tata Mad het Syta tt ih " reaiialy i A ti al ar +}i¥e | ‘ ‘ a tatty yeh cH Teeel bypeiarey: Vad tasate “ J carte iva {) yetkaelt iyi Nite minineatt pad i Hh nhs ri tay Et Bey ae ag WSL My aisle tai mis i Cc iif Nits, ay ¢ ' 1 “ Hedi aati: 48 halts iyfornie Hf in i TARP e haben yaey bata ona HH cae a r iepy ibe sap bie 1 tn) Pane rete rear ienss Viele Ti elite Htc i tht! (retaliate fa tu : Wetted tt bi a af i Pua. ray at 4 MBE is tt iii ites Uy nit ‘ i} Mus ite nie i rat rice hybe Mala etyasity Mt ae Via Bi bctabtey bubatney Th Weber tges LAN flew f] . Vadalg ti) res) Hr! Wau Arf aghey & * wit any na hy Fay Wot ty} Mary ay ahi Le A Hh | i ae ran hr ny uy i ALR. ttt 1! weir + petivs sh ofl Be bb) ite Pitriars t pe tSdageh det al iine sane He oH tent testi an ‘ rah ye POH en % bbe bp bade Net Wate aby hut ayiitd us bit {itis (ys 4 PALME pao War pee Wigs dl mer el ive att Hit t i Mi “i ni wee int bbe) hs Mae Asis Hie ny igh Oh ay \ iH 4 hh i dit att Jing tteayaes tit 4 Rts ta aura yt ne MeL ae ibs Vet t i AAR eis Gass vd Syed dt hi4 Vi thay pha beta ee frenetic we ean aM A hy | iisatinent wiih as ted at Lavra a WARN dt ath y$ iy uf nant ey 1h} aM + ‘ tone uRy i I \ ] oie x 4 it may ne bs Had Ta beady eh due\bal ales et stgags H y aL Peeubid y anit oF} ati Ht il 4 iy UU ya levty Mishel it a one: ba eytoyet atts tat Pret tH en $f rd Dh vaens Lana un si seorer aa? rite in ia Latieled es He 7 eM tal per ies re ; iS ith Ayhiteys Re tld asa beads Sic teed ven 4 enh (yf ait else HOT aH ony ee i; Paar cea 4 t HHT tit ty baba bia t ii hie Wve! rs eth atari Wale Ube a Weta i, etrest tet, yy rs | Ob 1) HR wyitey Ole tease, sey biy Sy bas keer ‘ 4 yyie\beee itu M bi tah ie « og 1, 4 Lu he td : sit Vi Huis is bes Pit eg HOE We ey NT rdkelayy Dh eat hee hed vs tisha we Mera rote He Hy Srerettainate bal Reba aye tatve they rhe Pilgntabsarignyta ate OU Wh H ' Pete peds LPeaES PA be by Ttaliiiataneatescies yy her Ms DO Ht aR er riPleR eT ntanity | naan "4 ty! wat PN MTOM HITE SLN CATE hs retest Lod HSE Hes Me OM LT OSL aE de Rebos lint HieHoy MY i When deste rtee yt tit yy a eee Were Sap bese peri PS "ih te Sigay pe dete pth 4 yperner wingetheay abe ‘ 1M t ey irae ot alg hit i iY 1, tet 4h ahs 1 vi et DF ist bar aiid reat ‘ Pent by bers Seber Mery pitted lee tit vets} veh etal day { be seme pec Eater ay yitate dalitualta ft ae ute iy id Paath ( feteny eUeptrrony ret tes 4 Vv ot aerator alate lawl ity farlase Pratt piehee 4 ly hate honed iy Hearne cuoteanieg is Ut ait FEF AAG tyes le i: shied hoy Mag agy Fy Me) Eat 4 1G fete (RP MLE a4 Ute nth site epanehe ! iti Tiigay iii fy guy. ry ah it Me bye {i Piltel alt H "yi at ict aer thi de fF Te tedeael ott Ee irl Vi nerh a pened ie ell eMiarts . f +46 are eg tn ee HA ditihyleione 4 1, abi ty veya ise hie whe ia Wl gee TARA be 4aue 5 " 1! densest at ; Tag geey is wy et { tebe tt fut HigHHO! t 1 mt Hiritelt Hl te yt rope Wy wid ' iG ie ae A Gh Adee ihe (hone rhe 4, ; ‘Nes HOME yeas : Hare HPs tee Ww bite {! rane 6 rhe | ait ‘ meee bei igiiw ey ietial t , Ve iy rr ay yay , bi f Eine si ayy iets aM ath) finale ai Maden 8 - ahriy! M i tue ee UM ae sire bee: see Sita) y og a Ed ENN? Minitin 7 Masta tia ty take bale Way i anes i p Mesjis re te } ei iley Ninerte Ved cGy etiter sl be bbe Och state’ | HI ataeh Uelysvtecaty iit alt ul Sd epr bas dive ara eeient! 4 ih bhi] peed strel sal Dateien hte OE i gush peads ena last iadasereattearleeuit a aeata te i st tee a tAE tigen hee {ine HH 3 rE Vir ealege Pap eatiey Ae eV regi Merri toe Hag da 4 ACEd Od 404 Sa EP hey, dept autheg Y te BH f ihe yin’ yes tt a hr] yoy wie r , . Ahi ' PE tea tana yh rf o) by Wi 4) oy thtaatid a ttt a dey etd V Oh ot Soffit ‘ at steed ws 4x4 ; 4 Hud aha? AE TM arg yeand Ee foranigisied ina edie Fi Leese M Thee shiz | uy Higa aa \ Web vet aid Hing rit 4 Mean OST Lali Vat Maen Hae we Mra laity yds Dil by i Oled erik ace Aiiy te dy gheihy ‘| } if ett satel 3 Bert Hi Hatin shi bebe tN Hae etal eaters a ye if fap iti rue vari heath tels Hai int i ih i te eh SHANE eel beve te tit u f sel i 19 ott te ; ‘ ' hig tiple ieee at au i f . if wate thes) ie auert Vayelloy He tit sii i iwiys tg this % Maa tdaaieyetill UATE Pe oon tbe bette i ‘ seearaly tesa tesd hah ticanael ar rm Pin ‘e inh deri tyot bs Tite Feop ot ot beaye ite Wty Nay ih dacaeadia a hres batt ith Maite ica dis tpleseeruatat) aah pallaly ete wet tedey ani oy HH Hi ; Bethy +44 pH PL eTiShee ri eit GaN aid: ra abot i) Hal i Brin behest i Poa tuectaera ci) 4 a4 wit ay iyi nig i ieee “) 4 Met Tie rene ait eek ae A aH Ste) Fs ANT! Cal a4 bite lau irveri lenis fhe racheir a Patil tel fuelgy te 4 entree? ae Hee ea i PUPPET RT ETE) Falta be ba Stat batshiaatr ty thd al laters fe aietaea c brbaeh \ st Dake te Fat ry ait ity 1a ist bet nin ate! eer HeILHM Hani ee a Yiu sete? Ha tiele We agtbus te Car siegleivte Wie A Lore Re hited ee Ata) iveuniiey oe aerbiaet : dott 3 cua vi aaa Co | aa eae ane #5 Taam i) $40 bbcy PART DS it atic Sih By on Lady data Hed He a ue papain eda Herat ddhes Sanit 4 Ai ‘i Hes arb Ha woe nt daiyedsttar) ra ati pat Hea aan sey pitt Oe tye we Oe gureiele trite py ies i # Aart it Fat lke tate dete. ts Heh pe Hie i {haateaybutt Apes ingle ; He baraty NTA Hatsic ' } 4 7 iy bu et eh th Heel we tigichteatee 0 a tet d Mii, fi hey thant We iis a ait) yay AAAS RE He sat not tt 4 Y she sities Pea yt &t pale rng Hes needa fy [ote ed payt{ Meda get ne Ae, Pil at i Helga ite thst Vet ua deals be hi if Pititee oY t ae age abit cat ity) i iy ie title yr Hi a ai iil Meritage At Airey ha Spig Vy Ped ts bee Bh Paty, ob iey Pet PHOT | ry Raat: Mea : Toya ih bter hi hr, 1 wie Hiyealelt : 1h theta) a ‘ spirit Eee ES GMT caolteacssynsib tt: fe so Le ae Hi ey nie : My : t a i a f shat i ine a a a Ht aaa . ce coast : 9 A tyl min 1 ae iat ’ Bet ‘i ag iiea Citas? iy STORY NATURAL py} Y SURVE Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/foreststreaminil02forb ar! Ae aia wes ae CG LPrinted by authority of the State of Illinois.) ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL HISTORY _ REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Survey DIvIsion Clean Up the Chinch-Bug. At the present time chinch-bugs are sufficiently abundant over nearly one-fifth of the State to cause serious crop losses next spring if the weather is at all favorable to their development. The whole or A winter harborage of chinch-bugs. EE —— ir parts of the following counties are seriously infested: Bond, Calhoun, Clay, Clinton, Effingham, Fayette, Greene, Jasper, Jersey, Macoupin, Madison, Marion, Monroe, Montgomery, Perry, Randolph, Richland, F Lif ¢ U. OF HLL. UB. 2 St. Clair, and Washington; and many of the adjoining counties have a slight to moderate infestation. ‘That the chinch-bug is capable of destroying all the corn and greatly reducing the yield of small grains and grass, is not questioned by any one who has had experience with the insect. It is of the greatest importance, not only to these counties but to the State as a whole, and even to the Nation, that we take every means possible to prevent a chinch-bug outbreak at this time. There are three general measures that can be taken to reduce chinch-bug damage: First, the destruction of the bugs in their winter quarters; second, the use of crops which will not be extensively injured and will tend to reduce the numbers of bugs; and third, the destruction of the bugs at the time of wheat harvest. It is with the first of these measures that this circular deals. During the winter, chinch-bugs may be found in nearly any moderately dry shelter. They are most abundant, however, along the south and west sides of hedge and brushy fence rows, ditch banks, the edges of woodlands, brush or briar patches in neglected fields or pastures, and especially in the bases of any of the bunch-forming grasses, such as blue-stem, or prairie-grass. They will be found in moderate to large numbers in and under bases of corn shocks and in small numbers behind the lower leaves of standing corn. Half a day spent in going over the average farm, using a news- paper or, better, a grain sack, on which samples of the trash from the above-mentioned situations can be examined, will locate the places_ where the bugs are most abundant. Having located them, advantage should be taken of every dry period during the winter and early spring to burn off the cover in these places. This should be done as early in the winter as possible, in order to expose to the weather the bugs not killed by the fire, so that a second or third burning may be done later in places where the bugs have reassembled. The best results will be had on days when the cover is dry enough to burn to the ground and when the wind is not strong. It has not generally been found profitable-to burn corn stalks, as by the time they have been broken down and raked into windrows they are very few bugs remain- ing in them. Experiments made in the part of Hie State now infested have shown that one thorough burning over of the usual places of chinch- bug hibernation will kill from 50 to 75 per cent of the bugs. .. Remember that every female chinch-bug killed this winter means, on the average, 150 fewer in the wheat and corn next spring, and 11,250 fewer of the second brood in the corn next summer. Ww) > 3 - VO It is needless to say that this work will have little effect in reducing general chinch-bug injury next season if it is done by scattered farmers here and there. To be successful it must be carried out generally over the whole area infested; and each community should organize and see that this work is done. The places where the bugs are, and the destruction they may Blue-stem, or bunch-grass, before burning. cause next spring being known, every effort should be made to reduce their numbers this winter. Food destroyed by insects is just as surely lost as it is when an enemy spy fires a grain elevator, or a submarine sinks a grain-laden ship. The man who harbors these: insect enemies on his farm, no matter how unwillingly, but who makes no attempt to destroy them, is certainly not doing all he can towards the winning of the war. WESLEY P. FLINT, Chief Field Entomologist. 1231 W. Edwards Street, Springfield, I1l., October 2, 1918. _ ing after burn Tass, or bunch- -stem, Blue 11585—10M ‘ScHNEPP & BARNES, STATE PRINTERS | SPRINGFIELD, ILL. 1919. -17691—2500 STATE OF ILLINOIS | | RTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION 4 ra Forest and Stream | in Illinois A By STEPHEN A. FORBES, Ph. D., LL. D. Chief of the Natural History Survey Division [Printed by authority of the State of Illinois.] a Ke aNS eA 4 Baal rol att Al ay a RTS st be STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION FRANCIS W. SHEPARDSON, Ph.D., LL.D., Director STEPHEN A. FORBES, Ph.D., LL.D., Chief of the State Natural History Survey Division THE BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION FRANCIS W. SHEPARDSON, PH.D., LL.D., Director of Registration and Education, Springfield, Chairman, ez officio. DaviID KINLEY, PH.D., University Dean, Urbana, representing the President of the University of Illinois, ex officio. JOHN W. ALvorD, C. E., Engineer, ‘Chicago, representing Water Resources. THOMAS C. CHAMBERLIN, PH.D., Sc.D., LL.D., University of Chi- cago, Chicago, representing Geology. JOHN M. CouLtTEerR, PH.D., LL.D., University of Chicago, Chicago, representing Forestry. WILLIAM A. NoYES, PH.D., LL.D., University of Illinois, Urbana, representing Water. WILLIAM 'TRELEASE, Sc.D., LL.D., University of Illinois, Urbana, representing Natural History. FOREST AND STREAM IN ILLINOIS * [By StepHEeNn A. Forses, Chief of the State Natural History Survey.]| I come to you this evening with a very definite pur- pose, that of asking the interest of the Academy, and of this representative audience in general, in certain measures intended to improve the conditions of life for the people of Illinois. The topic I have chosen for a very superficial treatment—all that my time permits —is that of the forests and streams of the State, such as they were a hundred years ago, such as they have now become under our management or neglect, and such as we hope to leave them to our descendants of a hundred years hereafter. Stream and forest are so frequently associated here in Illinois that where we see a forest we naturally look for a stream somewhere within its heart, and where we see a river we expect to see a forest bordering or im- bedding it. And yet, the two are in many respects at quite opposite extremes. A forest is stable, stolid, and old. An old tree is, I suppose, the oldest living thing in the world. It digs deep into the earth and brings to expression all the properties of all the soils in which it grows; it has concentrated in its trunk and in its tissues a permanent record of the weather, the seasons, the climates, of centuries—of milleniums, perhaps, in such giants as the red woods, it preserves unchanged in its heartwood particles deposited there a quarter of a century or more ago. A flowing stream, on the other hand, is the imme- diate product of its immediate environment, respond- ing quickly to rainfall, to drouth, to changes in tem- perature, and even to the unstable winds. Its material substance is rarely more than a few weeks, perhaps only a few days, old. In the complexity of its sensi- bilities and the variety of its responses, it is so much like a living thing that one needs to be a biologist to * Read December 8, 1918, at an open meeting of the Chi- cago Academy of Sciences, held in celebration of the hundredth anniversary of the admission of Illinois into the Union. study and to understand it. And to the biologist both stream and forest are captivating subjects of inquiry, for to him a river is not water only and a forest is not wholly made up of trees. Each is an environment and its content. The birds and insects, the shrubs and an- nual plants of a forest area are as much a part of the forest as are the trees themselves, all being brought and held therein—an associate group, an ecological society—by conditions as compelling as those which assemble men in cities; and the plants and plankton of a river, its crustaceans, clams, turtles, fishes, and even its water birds, are there just as the water is in and on which they live, because the special features of the particular environment impel or compel them into each others’ company in permanent association. So, when I speak of the study of a river or of a forest survey I must ask you to think of them as a survey, a study, of this kind of a forest, of a river in this sense of the word. THE FOREST A hundred years ago, according to the careful esti- mate of one of the most competent Illinois botanists of the last century,* 30 per cent. of the area of this so-called Prairie State—some ten or eleven million acres, in other words—was covered by trees. Just how much of this forest primeval remains to-day in Illinois we have no means of knowing at all exactly. After a general survey of our more important forests made in 1908-10, the total woodland area of the State was estimated at two million acres; but the U. S. Census of 1910 reports over three million acres of forest still remaining on what the Census Bureau calls farms—that is, on tracts of land each under one man- agement, on some part of which farm products are be- ing raised; and we get no hint of the area of additional forest properties on which no farm crops are grown. All are agreed, however, that such forests as we have remaining—a possible third of our original heritage— are being commonly mismanaged, or rather not man- aged at all. Neither the State nor the owner of forest lands has any definite forest policy. “While our wood- fands contain a large variety of valuable species, their silvicultural condition is very poor, and their pro- ductive capacity is much below normal owing to short- * Dr. Frederick Brendel, of Peoria. 6 sighted methods of cutting and to injury from grazing and fire. Their ownership is favorable to forest man- agement, but there is little appreciation of the possi- bility and advantage of increased yield by proper methods of treatment, and practically all industries de- pendent on local timber supplies are on the decline.” And this abuse of our present holdings is not by any . means the worst of our errors. A vast acreage has been cleared of trees and brought under the plow which ought to have been left in forests permanently. The Soil Survey of Illinois has now made progress sufficient to warrant general statements concerning the State as a whole, and from the director of this survey I learn that there are about six million acres of Illi- nois land that either are or ought to be permanently in trees, the soils of this great tract—25 per cent. larger than the whole State of Connecticut—being bet- ter adapted to the growth of trees than to any other agricultural use, and its broken surfaces making it liable to virtual ruin by erosion when brought under the plow. Much of it has, indeed, already been so ruined, and more of it has been abandoned after un- profitable attempts to cultivate it as farm land. The “abandoned lands of Illinois” is an expression strange to the ears of most of us, who still think of the State as an area of inexhaustible fertility. We have already begun to search for a remedy for these conditions. Besides a commercial survey of twenty-six counties made in 1908-10 to which I have already alluded—a survey made conjointly by the United States Forest Service and the Natural History Survey of the State—we have this year begun, with the aid of a whole-hearted group of Illinois naturalists, a survey of a much more thoroughgoing type. Several members of the faculties of the University of Chicago, the Northwestern University, the University of Illinois, and the Eastern Illinois State Normal School, and the teacher of botany in the Lake View High School in Chicago, have given the State, without compensation, large instalments of their vacation time, assisted also, in several instances, by their graduate students work- ing on the same generous terms; have made careful surveys of the tree growths of selected tracts in Jo Daviess, Cook, Vermilion, La Salle, Adams, Coles, and Cumberland counties; and are now preparing re- ports to be illustrated by photographs and maps for nh ‘ publication in the Bulletin of the Natural History Survey. And we shall seek this winter to secure the perma- nent appointment of a forestry expert as a State for- ester, and shall then turn him loose in the State to study the situation, to interview, to lecture, and to publish in a general educational campaign, and to come to conclusions as to what it is best to do for forestry in Illinois, so that two years hence we may have a rational, correct, and well-settled program of conser- vation and development to present to the Governor and the Legislature for their consideration. It is our plan to survey not merely the present forest areas, but to cover all the broken country especially adapted to the growth of trees, coming to conclusions as to the best use to be made of each tract of land, the kinds of trees with which it might best be planted, the rate of growth of the more important species in each situation and in each kind of soil, and the returns to be expected from forest culture in com- parison with other uses of this land. And we shall not for a moment leave out of sight the fact that an IIli- nois forest is much more than an equipment for money-making, that it is often of greater use for edu- cational, recreational, and esthetic purposes, as in parks and other places of public and private resort, than it is for the production of wealth; and all these various values must be taken into account in a public survey. The life of a forest as a whole, and not of its trees alone, and all the ways, whatever they may be, in which our forest lands may be made valuable to man, are the real subjects of study in a thoroughgoing survey. It is such a survey as this that we hope to see established in Illinois—one which will bring to bear upon its problems and applications the highest science, the soundest practical judgment, the shrewd- est private enterprise, and the finest public spirit of our people; and it is for such a survey that I have to ask the approval and the assistance of this Academy, and of all those concerned to whom these presents may come. THE RIVER The problem of the protection, utilization, and de- velopment of our aquatic resources is much more com- plicated and difficult than that of our forests, because 8 there are many discordant interests centered along our water courses—commercial fisheries interests; the in- terests of the sporting fisherman, the two often an- tagonistic; a great agricultural interest in the enclos- ure reclamation, and cultivation of land subject to overflow; manufacturing interests, which poison the streams with the wastes of huge factories; municipal interests, which find in the nearest river the most con- venient and the cheapest means of sewage disposal, and the interest of those who live beside the stream, or resort to it for labor, business, or pleasure, that it shall be kept inoffensive if not inviting, and healthful if not altogether clean. Permit me to take, as a marked example, the largest river of the State, the one from which Illinois derives its name. Two hundred and seventy-three miles in length, formed by the junction of the Kankakee River and the Des Plaines, and receiving now a large con- tribution of Lake Michigan water by way of Chicago River and the drainage canal of the Sanitary District of Chicago, it may be said to rise at the very gates of this great city. It is in many ways a remarkable stream, unlike any other in the country. “It is pecu- liarly characteristic of the State of Illinois, and next to its prairies, was its leading natural feature. Its broad bottom-lands, the bed of a former outlet of the Great ‘Lakes system; covered with huge trees, completely flooded when the river is highest and holding many marshes and shallow lakes at its lowest stages, are a relic of the time, not so very far removed, when the limpid waters of the great glacial lakes rolled down its valley in a mighty flood on their course to the south- ern gulf. It gave to the discoverers of Illinois the first means of access to our territory, and on its banks _ was built the first fortified post. It was the first great _ artery of transportation into and through the State, and among the first colonial settlements were those established on its banks.” It was, until recently, and perhaps is yet, by far the richest river in the country in the product of purely fresh-water fisheries. Ac- cording to the U. S. Census its yield in fishes only, in 1908, was equivalent to a dollar for every two feet of its length in prices paid to fishermen, or in those paid by the consumer, to more than two dollars for each foot. Its frequently beautiful and occasionally pictur- esque scenery is attracting more attention every year, 9 ‘ ~~ SS and the time is surely at hand when the people of Ih- nois will learn to appreciate and develop this great gift of nature in the various directions in which it may be made to serve their interests‘and their pleasures. Just now, however, it is at the very lowest estate of its whole history. Virtually all the sewage of Chicago is delivered to it, and the same may be said of every city and town upon its banks. By diking and drainage operations it is being robbed of the haunts of its water birds and the principal breeding-grounds and feeding- grounds of its fishes, and corn will presently be grow- ing every year on some 200,000 acres of forest, marsh, and lake over which its waters spread a few years ago in time of flood. A brief outline of a few of the main features of its recent biological history will help you to see what is happening to it and why, and what ought to be done by us if we are to give to our descendants of the com- ing century as much as we should of the values which came into the hands of our predecessors a hundred years ago. A critical moment in the history of the stream was January 17, 1900, when, by the opening of the drain- age canal of the Sanitary District of Chicago, the IIli- nois again became, after a lapse of ages, a partial out- let to the waters of the Great Lakes. The flow through the two canals, the Illinois and Michigan and the sani- tary canal, both deriving their waters from the same source, was equal in 1913 to the average natural flow of the river at Peoria, a hundred and ten miles down stream. This increment from the canals is of course virtually constant at all seasons of the year, while the natural flow of the stream varies greatly from time to time, with the result that, when the river is lowest, about four-fifths of its water comes from Lake Michi- gan, and when it is highest, only about a tenth, the ratio of Michigan water to that derived from the wa- tershed of the stream, rising and falling inversely to the rise and fall of the river gages. The river conse- quently can not now fall as low, under like conditions, as before 1900, the rising river begins sooner to spread over its bottomlands, the overflows are more extensive, the bottom-land lakes are filled to a greater depth and cover a larger area, and the water recedes more slowly after a rise, all these effects being necessarily more 10 Ww obvious and pronounced on the upper smaller part of the stream than on the lower larger part. Now, the productivity of a river depends, other things being equal, upon the area of shallow water along its banks and draining freely into it from its border-lands, for it is in such shallow water that plant and animal life is, generally speaking, most abundant. The immediate effect of the opening of the canal must consequently have been to increase the total yield of the stream, and this conclusion is confirmed by many comparative collections made by us by quantitative methods for long periods before and after 1900. Coincident, however, with this admission of lake water to the river has come another powerful influ- ence in the admission of the total sewage of Chicago as carried by the canals; and this has worked in opposite directions in the different parts of the stream. The organic matter of the sewage in process of de- composition so fouls the water of the upper river, especially in midsummer, that its natural plant and animal life is then virtually destroyed or displaced, and characteristic sewage organisms take its place. I quote from a survey report published by us in 1913: “In the seventeen-mile section of the Illinois from Morris, nine miles below its origin, to the upper dam the river reaches its lowest point of pollutional dis- tress, becoming, when very hot weather coincides with a low stage of water, a thoroughly sick stream. Its oxygen is-nearly all gone; its carbon dioxide rises to the maximum; its sediments become substantially like the sludge of a septic tank; its surface bubbles with the gases of decomposition escaping from sludge banks on its bottom; its odor is offensive; and its color is gray with suspended specks and larger clusters of sewage organisms carried down from the stony floor of the polluted Des Plaines, or swept from their at- tachments along the banks of the Illinois. On its surface are also floating masses of decaying debris borne up by the gases developing within them, and covered and fringed with the ‘sewage fungus’ and the bell animalcule usually associated in these waters. The vegetation and drift at the edge of the stream are also everywhere slimy with these foul-water plants and minute filth-loving animals. * * * “The normal life of the stream practically disap- pears in the absence of oxygen; its fishes withdraw to Lat 5 a ee a ee neighboring unpolluted waters; its mollusks, crusta- ceans, ordinary insect larvae and other more or less sedimentary forms disappear to be replaced mainly by slime-worms and Chironomus larvae in the sludge; and its chlorophyll-bearing plants linger only along the edges in shallow water. With the advent of cooler weather and higher river levels, most of these marked symptoms disappear, and a few fishes may even make their way into the stream, particularly in the vicinity of the motths of creeks. In spring and in fall, bub- bling from the bottom ceases, the odor of the water is no longer repellant, a few invertebrate animals reap- pear, and the oxygen ratios rise to a considerable frac- tion of those normal to the Kankakee. The extent of this seasonal oscillation depends, of course, upon the rainfall and temperature; and the opposite extreme is reached in winter, when midstream oxygen ratios may be fully as high as those of the summer time for Chil- licothe and Peoria.” A careful survey, chemical and biological, made last August and September, showed us that the foul- ing of the waters was extending steadily down stream at an average rate, during the last six years, of five to ten miles a year,* and that the Illinois River from its origin at Dresden Heights to Peoria Lake, ninety- three miles down, is now nearly deserted by fishes, at * The recent degeneration of the Illinois River above Peoria is shown by the following table, bringing into comparison the oxygen content of the water over a sixty-mile stretch of the river from Depue to Pekin as shown by analyses made in the summers of 1911 and 1912 and again in July and August, 1918. RATIOS OF DISSOLVED OXYGEN IN ILLINOIS RIVER WATER, STATED IN PARTS PER MILLION, SUMMERS OF 1911 AND 1912 IN COMPARISON WITH SUMMER OF 1918. Parts per Parts per Ratio of million million later period Stations. 1911, 1912 1918. to earlier. VST renee Mes alavioke Manaiene vabacalon ene aie 2.65 0.16 1—16.6 EVER SOU Fil idiiateiahee attain le dale Hlolie vee 2.41 0.25 1— 9.6 EVISTA titre! atte autehelvete ner oleMeita releterce 2.35 0.65 1— 38.6. EO EN Haase aids euietekeh CHL Nile, teeters 2.45 0.92 1— 2.7 CHICO ena Ane ncaa S20 dba LG 1— 2.8 TPN eit a UBM DYE aE URN Ck DS) Me AVAIL Cd Lt aya (oa 2.08 1— 2.7 What these oxygen ratios signify as compared with those of a tolerably clean water may be shown by a comparison of them with the ratios of dissolved oxygen for the Kankakee and with those of Depue Lake. August 21, 1911, the oxygen of the Kankakee River just above its mouth stood at 8.47 parts per million at 10 a.m., and at 10.15 parts per million at 2 p.m., the increased ratio in the afternoon being due to the oxygen given off by water-plants under the influence of sunshine; while in Depue Lake, September 11, 1911, the oxygen ratio stood at 12.92 parts per million when that of the river just above the lake was 2.65 parts per million. 12 _ least in summer, its dominant life then being that of a contaminate stream. Peoria Lake, however, a shallow expanse of the river about seventeen miles long and a mile and a half wide at its broadest part, serves at present as a kind of a check valve against the ex- tension of these conditions farther down the stream, and in and below the lake the life of the river becomes nearly normal. The sewage load of the stream is steadily increasing year by year, however, and how long it may be before this frail barrier is broken through of course we can not say. From another point of view, we may regard the river water as a fluid and flowing soil, the basis of the growth of aquatic organisms, and Chicago sewage as a fertilizer enriching this soil and making it more pro- ductive when the raw sewage elements have been worked over by decay and oxygenation, and thus made available as food for aquatic plants and animals, and through them finally, by way of fishes especially, as food for man. This process of conversion and assimi- lation of the organic contents of a flowing stream of course takes time, and time in a river means progress downward; and it takes temperature also, proceeding rapidly with midsummer heat and slowly in midwinter cold. The current of the Illinois has been accelerated, of course, by the volume of lake water added to it by the canals, but it is still slow enough to give suf- ficient time for the conversion of much Chicago sew- age into available food by the time it has reached the middle course of the stream, and this middle course is also much the most important for fisheries. At pres- ent, therefore, the Illinois fisherman and the consumer of his fish have, ‘so far as we know, no definite reason to complain of the total effect of the influx of city sewage, for it has probably profited more than it has injured them. Although it has destroyed the fishery of the smaller, less important, upper hundred miles of the river proper, it seems to have increased the yield’ of the eighty miles next following. It is especially be- cause the pollution of the stream is increasing that we have reason to apprehend more serious economic consequences. And now of recent years there has come on another still more disturbing factor, that of the reclamation and improvement of the rich river bottom-lands and the drainage of many lakes whose beds are now fields 13 of corn. This process is inevitable because it is highly profitable, bringing in returns much larger than could be got in any other way; but it leaves the Illinois River much as Samson was left when shorn of his locks by the self-seeking Delilah. Already the annual yield of the Illinois has fallen off at least one-half since the last census data were obtained in 1908; and this process is also progressive, although the greater part of the bottom-lands which are reclaimable have now been reclaimed. ‘The effect upon the river is to im- poverish its biology in two different ways, by drying up.its most productive waters and by hemming in its flow in times of flood, thus speeding up its current so that it carries its sewage content more rapidly down- ward, leaving less time for its transformation and utilization, and pouring it out unused at the mouth of the stream in much larger ratio than formerly—an enormous loss of food resources to the Illinois which inures possibly to the benefit of the Mississippi, into which our stream empties. Such is a very sketchy description of only a part of the vicissitudes to which the long-suffering Illinois is being subjected during these latest years of its checkered history, and there are more yet to follow. What will probably be the biological effect of the changes contemplated by the waterway engineers in making the Illinois again a connecting link of trans- portation between the Great Lakes and the Gulf, is a subject for some other time and place. And if you ask me what is to be done under the circumstances in the public interest, I shall have to answer that I do not know, but that I want to find out. When present and prospective drainage projects are completed, there will still remain, in the Illinois valley below La Salle, 170,000 acres under water or subject to overflow at times of highest flood, a valuable fish- eries property in itself and capable, as we may believe, of material improvement if intelligently handled in the public interest. Some day we shall have, and I hope, quite soon, a fisheries experiment station on the Illh- nois equipped to do for the important streams of the State and for the great rivers which nearly surround it, something like what the agricultural experiment station does for Illinois farm lands. We have in hand such a project, in fact, for which we propose fish ponds and a headquarters building on land, and with 14 the other equipment, chemical, biological, and prac- tical, mainly on houseboats similar to the floating laboratory of biology which we have had for more than twenty years on the Illinois, all capable of being shifted from place to place, as may be necessary, in our extensive field. By the general and special studies possible with such an equipment, a policy of manage- ment and control should be worked out in the general interest, such as an intelligent and resourceful owner would establish if our public waters were his private property. f The problem of streams pollution consequent on current methods of sewage disposal lies, of course, quite outside the field of our Natural History Survey ; ‘ but any citizen may say, as I do now, that the intelli- gence, conscience, public spirit, money, and power of the city of Chicago and of the other municipalities concerned are surely sufficient for its solution. A people which will do in a spirit of boundless self- sacrifice what we have done in the past two years for the welfare of foreign nations, will not balk perma- nently at the few millions needed to make our waters wholesome, clean, and physically decent for the use of the people of Illinois; and I believe that this Academy may help materially to hasten the day when the law of the State forbidding the pollution or defile- ment of any stream or lake in Illinois by the deposit, addition, or discharge therein of any foul or injurious substance such that fish and other aquatic life is de- stroyed, may be fairly and wisely enforced by the State department upon which that duty now rests. 4 hg Me } A * i) (4 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS-URBANA 570IL6C C006 ore INN 0112