os a nage are da Highgate iat Cn Goblet noch de triee SENS LS See ne ce tent went nner Sam SRT Pinay Sa Romnin osnstinnd genie ine ws SS oceene, sures esniteoatin's aneroits rage Siete ince pious 65 ; eats LIBRAR OF CONGRESS. pias one es ee ene po Meee, ee EL FOREST TREE PLANTERS MANUAL. “EMBODYING SUCH INSTRUCTIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR TREE PLANTING AND CULTIVATION AS EXPERIENCE AND OBSERVATION HAVE DEMONSTRATED TO BE USEFUL AND RELIABLE.”— Vide Resolution of Ex. Commuittee. > f ~ & f , By LEONARD B. HODGES. ou4 PUBLISHED BY THE Minnesota State Forestry Association. ST. PAUL, MINN: J. J. LEMON, BOOK AND JOB PRINTER. 1879. a Ae PREFACE. HE object of this work is concisely stated on the title page. It will be practical, and will embody such practical suggestions and ex- periences in forest culture, as are known to be reliable. It is intended as an aid to all who are interested in forestry, and to all who are trying to redeem the treeless regions and render them not only habitable, but desirable for permanent homes. No attempt will be made for originality, but all available sources of information will be invaded and plundered for the benefit of all who are trying to make homes on the great western prairies. LB: EH: Preparation of the Soil. G7 XPERIENCE has demonstrated beyond cavil, that a proper and thorough preparation of the soil, is a pre-requisite of success. Were I to fit up a ten acre piece of prairie for the planting of a tree claim under the provisions of the Congressional Timber Culture Act, this is about the way I should do it. I would break the prairie in June, from the 15th to 25th, if possible. L would break 1t about three inches deep, and do it well. No baulks or “cut and cover” should be tolerated. The sod should be all cut clear and all turned over; whether “kinked” or jointed down flat, makes no difference, so you only break in ‘the proper season and do it well. In the following October you will find the sod tolerably well decomposed, and also an inch or so of soil beneath the sod. Then, either cross-plow or back-set, going from one to two inches deeper. The following spring this soil is in good condition for a crop. Any kind of a hoed crop is preferable to small grain, because to grow corn, potatoes, &c., profitably, requires thorough cultivation, and just this thorough cultivation which your hoed crop demands, is just the treatment the soil needs in fitting it up for tree planting. Another year of such cultivation before the tree- cuttings or tree seed is planted, is advisable, if you have time. If not, go ahead with your planting. Under the provisions of the Timber Culture Act, as amended, you can grow two hoed crops as above, and plant your young forest trees, seeds or cuttings, in the fall, after harvesting the second hoed crop, or in the following spring. You can raise two crops of wheat, or other small grain, instead? of the hoed crop, if you choose, but in so doing you do not prepare the ground so thoroughly for forest culture, and you are pretty sure to sow more or less foul stuff with your small grain, which entails an endless amount of hard work in its extermination; for it must be exterminated promptly if you expect your young forest to prosper as it should. No weeds or foul stuff should be allowed to go to seed. Clean culture till the trees have so far grown and developed as to com- pletely shade the ground, is just what you must have to produce the most satisfactory results, after which the annual falling of the foliage mulches the ground and renders further cultivation superfluous. The foregoing remarks are intended to apply to the common average undulating or rolling prairie. There is, however, a very large amount of . very smooth and level prairie in western Minnesota, especially in the valley of the Red River, where the treatment should be somewhat differ- ent. Much of this land is covered with a short, thin growth of the meanest sort of slough grass. The sod is tough, very tough; in fact, tough is no name for it. Unless broken in the proper season, it might as well not be broken at all. If you break it too early, the grass grows up through it much more luxuriantly than ever before. If you break it a little ‘two late it bakes down like an adobe pads) and requires time, ¢ _ FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 5. frost, air and moisture to slack it. There is no particular use in trying to raise any kind of a crop on such land the next year after breaking. My own experience in the treatment of this sort of prairie, is to break . the last of June and first of July. Let it lay for about a year, and then either back-set or cross-plow, bringing up as much fresh dirt as you can. In fact, I would summer fallow it the next season after breaking, and I .think the second season after breaking the sod I would sow it to wheat. By this time the ameliorating influences of sun, air, frost, moisture and summer fallow, will have so far operated on the obtuse and refractory nature of the soil as to have changed to a great extent its naturally sour, cold, disagreeable character, and put in condition to begin to repay the labor heretofore bestowed on it. There are latent virtues in such land well worth developing. Once brought out, and you will be amply repaid for the extra time and labor it has cost. Most any kind of good manure is a sovereign panacea for this sort of prairie; not because the ground is lacking in fertility, for it is not, but because the manure acts as an alterative, neutralizing the sourness of the soil. This sort of land, once thoroughly conquered, will prove of inexhaustible fertility, and, I feel confident, would then pro- duce a thrifty growth of Black and Gray Ash, Basswood, Red, White and Rock Elm, Hackberry, Cottonwood, Box Elder, White Willow, Tam- arac, Soft Maple, Ironwood, Wild Plum, Cherry, Crab Apple and prob- _ ably other varieties of timber, and will prove to be admirably adapted to. wheat, oats, barley, all vegetables and timothy, blue-joint and red-top grasses. MANNER OF PLANTING. The Timber Culture Act as now amended, allows great latitude in this direction, but the fact that the doctrine of thick planting is officially endorsed and required, must not be lost sight of. Your trees when planted must average not more than four feet apart each way. This requires some twenty-seven hundred and thirty trees to be planted on each and every one of the ten acres. The two primary objects, shelter and fuel, are constantly to be kept in view. Those once secured, the aesthetic and ornamental naturally claim proper attention. No vegetable grows more luxuriantly, with proper care — and cultivation, than the Scotch Pine. No tree, unless we except the pioneer tree, the Cottonwood, is better adapted to the greater portion of our treeless region. A double row of Scotch or White Pine—rows eight to ten feet apart—breaking joints in planting, trees eight to ten feet apart in the rows, will, in five or six years from planting, form a timber-belt and shelter so close as scarcely to admit the flight of a bird through its dense foliage of living green. . And I can truthfully say about the same thing of our own native White Pine; while from year to year, far beyond the limits of an ordi- nary human life, they continue to grow, increasing in size and in value, monuments of arboreal beauty. But unfortunately, like too large a pro- portion of the good things of earth, their high price places them beyond the reach of the great majority of poor men who wander over our great prairies in search of tree claims and of homes; and as I am writing this as much in the interest of the poor man as of any other class, we must talk about something within his reach—something sure to grow, somie- thing cheap, rapid in growth, absolutely hardy, something that will “git up and git.” The Cottonwood will do all this, and so will the White 6 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. Willow. The fellows who are too poor to grow them successfully, have no business on the prairies. PROPER DISTRIBUTION OF THE 27,300 TREES WE MUST PLANT ON THE TEN ACRES. There is once in a while a fellow who will plant it all in one grove forty rods square, and put his house, barns, stables, stock yards, right in the middle of it. Others will plant a timber-belt five rods wide along the north and west lines of the quarter section, while others will plant a strip two and a half rods clear around the whole quarter section. Where the quarter section is tolerably uniform in surface and soil, either way has its merits and advantages. Should, as is often the case, the quarter section be cut up more or less with ponds, lakes, marshes or running streams, then the plan should conform to the topography. It also hap- pens that a quarter section, every other way desirable, has at least ten acres of sandy or gravelly knolls.. In such case, plant them by all means with the varieties suitable for such localities, and in a few years . you will transform them into the most valuable portion of your quarter section. . CLOSE PLANTING. I had supposed the reasons for close planting had been so fully set - forth, and the advantages so apparent to every thinking man, that nothing would be necessary to say on this subject in this work. Yet, scarcely a day passes, when I am not called upon for the reasons. Not wishing to cumber these pages with any surplusage on any branch of forestry, and yet, in deference to many whose views on many subjects, I entertain great respect, I hereby present the reasons that incline me to favor close planting in starting a young forest.. In the study of forestry, nature is our greatest and best qualified teacher. ~ To the close observer, the pages of her great book are spread wide open through the primeval forest, over the wide-spreading prairies—every where—covered with characters so legible, that the way-faring man, though a fool, need not err. I have now in mind a young forest in Min- nesota, that I regard a model. Twenty-five years ago I passed over the ground on which this young forest now stands. It was then what we would term “grub prairie,” thickly studded with Jack Oak grubs from six to twelve inches high. There were patches of Hazel among them There were occasionally, feeble scattering specimens of Aspen. Curious to know of the development that might occur if this piece of ground had. a fair show, I protected it for years from the fires that had for ages an- nually swept over it. Soon the grubs began to send up strong, straight, thrifty leaders. The Aspen came along the next season with great vigor. In a year or two more, Butternut trees began to appear, (probably planted by the provident squirrel, who must have carried them more than a mile, as no bearing trees were then standing any nearer). Soon the Bass wood put in a strong delegation. For the first ten years that patch of ground grew into a perfect thicket, so dense as to be nearly impenetrable. Sha- ding the ground from the rays of the sun; holding the moisture from too rapid evaporation, the annual shedding of the foliage, mulching the sround and answering all the purposes of thorough cultivation ; this dense mass: constantly shooting upward toward the sky. Then began tbe demonstration of the doctrine of the “survival of the fittest.” At FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. if that period, there could not have been less than ten thousand young trees to the acre. Gradually, the more vigorous began to assert their suprem- acy. Gradually, the feeble, the dwarfs and pigmies began to disap- pear, and at the close of the second decade, the underbrush had nearly disappeared, and a noble grove of Oak, Basswood, Butternut, Aspen, &c., good for twenty cords per acre, stood, where twenty years previous noth- ing but Jack-oak grubs, Hazel-bush and grass covered the ground. To emphasize the lesson, nature is repeating the lesson so taught, in a thou- sand localities in Minnesota, always with equal and uniform success, wherever her young plantations are protected from fire and cattle. And yet, with all this overwhelming testimony, conclusive, in proof of the great value of close forest planting, educated men, college graduates, authors, editors, &c., quite frequently evince a disposition to lock horns with me on this subject. Ye .blind guides and fools, throw away your musty books, and your still mustier notions, and get out into the thick- ets and brush and tall timber, and stay there twenty years, and you will learn something. And now I have my hand in, I will call in other tes- timony on this point, and so far as I am concerned, close this discussion, and quit answering letters from fellows who think they can grow a forest by planting trees twelve feet apart on the unbroken prairie. Prof. E. Gale, of the Kansas Agricultual College, Manhattan, says: “The value of close planting can be realized much better after the very sad ex™ perience of 1874. There are several points that may be urged for close planting: '. The force of these observations will be much better appreciated when we have carefully examined the facts which can be adduced by experience. Trees should be planted closely. 1. For the mutual protection of the trees. 2. For econony in culture. 3. For immediate protection. 4. For the purpose of securing available timber. 5. For the purpose of securing early returns from our planting.” Again. In speaking of that clause in the Timber culture act of 1873- 4, permitting trees to be planted twelve feet apart, he says: “Trees thus planted will not serve the purpose of a forest, but virtually become an open orchard.”— Correct. Dr. Franklin B. Hough, in his very valuable report on forestry, refer- ring to this point, says : : “Opinions very generally agree as to error in the clause allowing a space of twelve feet between trees at first planting. In fact, this open spacing appears to be in opposition to sound principles in sylviculture, and is to be regretted, because on the prairies, and on the great western plains, where, planting is most needed, the drying winds that prevail at certain seasons cannot well be endured by trees, unless so closely set as to shelter one another from the earliest period. Such plan- tations would, of course, require trimming from time to time, as the trees became larger and required more room.” Horace Greeley, says: “Plant thickly, and of diverse kinds, so as to cover the ground promptly and choke out weeds and shrubs, with full purpose to thin and prune as circumstances may dictate.” Judge C. E. Whiting, of Monona county, Iowa, remarked in 1869, that he had at first planted Cottonwood eight feet apart each way, giving each tree 64 feet of ground. They grew well, but too many branches in pro- portion to the amount of body wood. He had adopted the rule of plant- ing three feet each way, giving nine square feet to a tree, and in this order they grew tall, and straight, soon shaded the ground, and in three years needed no further cultivation than thinning as became necessary, 8 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. by removing alternate rows and drawing out the poles with one horse and chain. In the Forestry Annual of the Iowa Horticultural Society, Judge Whi- ting, one of the committee charged with the preparation of the Annual, from his own experience, (perhaps the most extensive of any person in the country, in this branch of forestry,) says: “T have in belts, around my fields, varying from single to twenty rows of trees, mostly planted sc close as to take 4,356 to the acre, (the amended timber culture act only calls for 2,730 per acre), about 40 acres of timber. The trees in these belts vary as to time of planting; some are eighteen years old, and some only one year planted, the greater portion, however, are from five to twelve years of age. The needed thinning of these belts furnishes all the wood that is wanted on the farm, including stakes and rails to keep the fences in repair ; posts for all repairs needed, and many for new fencss, I annually build in extending my farm. There is not a stick of needed timber on the farm, from a pea-bush, a grape-vine stake, or a binding pole, up to a fair sized saw-log, that cannot be had from my groves, — without cutting a single tree that does not need thinning out from the groves.’’ But why cumber the ground with further testimony? The foregoing ‘is conclusive, unimpeachable and unanswerable in proof of close planting. I submit the case to the jury without further comment. The farm of Judge Whiting, is on the line of railroad from St. Paul to Omaha. It consists of some 1,800 acres, and his closely planted young forests are the admiration of every one who has the good fortune to see them. They are an unanswerable argument in favor of close tree plant- ing. VARIETIES OF TREES SUITABLE FOR YOUNG FORESTS, IN MINNE- SOTA—ALSO, FOR PLANTING ALONG THE HIGHWAYS. In the elucidation of this topic, I begin by inserting a paper I prepared for the State Horticultural Society, and read at its annual session, in Rochester, January, 1878. PLANTING TREES FOR SHADE AND ORNAMENT ON STREETS AND ROADS—WHAT TREES TO PLANT, AND HOW TO PLANT THEM. The foregoing is the heading of the accompanying article. The text was furnished by Prof. Lacy. I don’t know what book he got it out of; neither do I care. There ought to be a good many sermons preached on that text to all the people of Minnesota. Right here in Rochester, it don’t seem so neces- sary. The people here have appreciated the importance and necessity of this work, and have taken hold of it in earnest. The changed appear- ance of this town-site, as between 1854, when I first camped on it and now, 1878, is due more to tree planting than to any other one class of improvements. Great as has been the change in this immediate vicinity within so short a time, still greater changes have occurred in other localities. Vil- lages and cities originally built on the open prairie, without a tree or shrub in sight, whose streets and avenues were formerly raked fore and aft by the fierce blasts of winter, and scorched by the blazing suns of sumnier, have, by the intervention of the tree planter, been converted into bowers of beauty, protected alike from furious wind, and blazing sun. No investment of time and money is more satisfactory or more perma- nently useful, than that employed in planting forest trees along the lines FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 9 of our public highways. In a prairie country like ours, no investment adds so much to the beauty of the country, or the ready. cash value of the real estate so adorned. The prosecution of this good work appeals alike to the best judgment and most cultivated taste. Much has been done in this direction, but far more remains yet to be done. We have done just enough to thoroughly demonstrate the prac- _ tical nature’of the work, the thorough adaptability of our prairie soil to develop magnificent specimens of forest trees. In the -tree planting returns of 1877, the number of rods planted to trees and hedges along the public highways of Minnesota, is given as 265,633, equivalent to 642 miles and 192 rods. - The returns are imper- fect, incomplete. One thousand miles would be much nearer the mark. This is a good beginning, but only a beginning. - Have any of you figured on the probable number of miles of public highway in the prairie portion of Minnesota? There are full five hun- dred prairie townships in what is known as the treeless region of Min- nesota. Then there are at least half as many more prairie townships in _ other comparatively well timbered counties, like Olmstead and Dodge. - This rough estimate, which I think is below the actual figures, gives us 760 townships of prairie. Allowing thirty-six miles of public highway to each township, gives us 27,000 miles. This must be doubled to give us a row each side the highway, making a total of not less than 54,000 miles yet to be planted along the highways of the prairie regionsof Min- nesota; enough to reach twice around the globe and some four thousand miles to lap over. Who can correctly estimate the climatic effects and the ameliorating influences following so grand a work? I assume, as a matter of course, that in the treeless region, the planting would be close enough to form staunch and permanent wind breaks. The protection thus afforded to growing crops, would of itself be of inestimable value. The protection afforded to orchards and other fruit growing institutions, would alone amply repay the cost, while the com- fort afforded to man and beast, would be beyond the power of figures to eXpress.. VARIETIES OF FOREST TREES BEST ADAPTED FOR THIS WORK. This is so largely a matter of taste that no list that could be made would suit every one. This task must conform to facts and to common sense. Theadaptability of the soil to each variety of forest tree, must be recognized. The natural limits that have been assigned to each variety of forest tree,must be borne in mind, and then the peculiar ser- vice required in the particular locality to be benefitted, and, finally, the pecuniary ability of the owner of the real estate must be taken into account. For merely shade, in my opinion, no tree can excel the White Elm (Ulmus Americanus). As an ornamental shade tree it is absolutely unap- proachable. It is undoubtedly the most “magnificent vegetable of the temperate zone.” It is.long-lived, hardy, and a rapid grower. But it needs room to spread itself. Planted sixty feet apart, their tops will inter- lock long before reaching maturity. The White Elm will do well on any Minnesota prairie, from Iowa to Manitoba, but grows more rapidly on river bottoms and rich, moist soil. It seems to possess the advantage of - withstanding the bad effects of dust and smoke, and would consequently be better adapted to planting in large towns than most other varieties of trees. In this connection, let me warn the fellows out on the broad 0 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. prairies, not to plant too large White Elms. I have seen them trans- planted from two to three or four inches in diameter, trimmed to bare poles, tops cut off say twelve to fifteen feet from the ground, and in three. years develope so much top that the wind would blow them over so far as to leave them standing at a very acute angle. They seem to develope top more rapidly than root. On the rich, moist, alluvial soil of the west-. ern counties, plant small trees. Acer Saccharinwm—Sugar Maple, Rock Maple. The Sugar Maple, as ashade and ornamental tree, cannot be too highly prized. It is indigenous to Minnesota, but is more particular about its location than the White Elm. In thisstate it prefers well drained local- ities. A locality in which the White Elm would flourish to perfection, would,in many instances, prove fatal to the Sugar Maple. I have had but poor success in planting them on level prairie, with deep clay sub- soil. Such localities should be underdrained for the Sugar Maple. I very much doubt if they can be made to live where the ground is satur- ated with moisture during the growing season. On the second bench of the streams, and along the banks and sides of ravines, on any tolerably good soil, and on hill sides, the Sugar Maple flourishes and reaches its best proportions. Poor, sandy soils are not suited to the growth of the Sugar Maple, neither are most of the rich bottom lands of the Red River Valley. Juglans Nigra—Black Walnut. All things considered, I am, strongly inclined to the belief, that the Black Walnut is the most valuable forest tree that can be grown in Min- nesota. Its growth is very rapid, and when fully developed, is one of the largest of our forest trees. It prefers a rich, moist soil, but will flourish and make a very satisfactory growth on any number one prairie not too far north. The Minnesota valley seems to be the northern limits for this tree in that portion of Minnesota west of the Mississippi river. JI have never seen any Black Walnut to amount to anything, north of the valley of the Minnesota river. They are a tender tree when young, and we occasionally get a winter in which they require considerable protection. _As a shade and ornamental tree, it sometimes rivals the White Elm. When planted as a shade tree, give it plenty of room, that its natural habit of throwing out a low, broad top may be encouraged. Bryant tells of a Black Walnut tree at three feet from the ground, twenty-five feet in circumference. “At the height of twelve or fifteen fect, the trunk divides into several branches, cach of which by itself would constitute a large tree; the whole forming an immense canopy, overshadowing an area one hundred and fifty feet in diameter.” Juglans Cinerea—Butternut. When grown in open ground, throws out a low, spreading top; is a hardy, rapid grower, and in all respects a desirable shade and ornamen- tal tree. This treeand its first cousin, the Black Walnut, ought to be considered in the double character of not only forest but fruit trees. A Black Walnut orchard, or a Butternut orchard, propagated from the seed planted on the right kind of soil, would soon throw in the shade any apple orchard in Minnesota; would come into bearing as quick, would grow faster, stand more grief, and bring more bushels of either fruit or dollars, in the long run. I suggest, as a practical measure, the offering FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANTAL. 11 of liberal premiums to encourage the planting oe Black Walnut and But- ternut orchards. Tilia Americana—Linn, Linden, Basswood. This is another very desirable shade tree. Rapid grower, hardy, long lived. Will grow and develope well on any good farming land, but pre- fers a rich, moist, cool soil. Furnishes good shade and shelter for man and beast, and also bountiful crops of flowers, from which the “little busy bee” manufactures a most excellent article of honey. Basswood, suitable for transplanting, is not easily found in large numbers in our: native forests, and the main source of supply for shade trees, must be from propagation in forest tree nurseries. Fraxinus Amer Fe nr ct Ash. One of our most valuable forest trees. Very hardy. Rapid grower, and when planted wide apart, throws out-a beautiful; wide spreading top. - Most of the prairie soil of Minnesota is well adapted to the growth of the White Ash. This tree will do its best in a cool, deep, moist soil. It don’t amount to much on a warm, dry, sandy soil; is not afraid of cold weather; deserves a higher rank in public estimation. For general planting on our northwestern prairies, no forest tree merits more general cultivation and attention. It is easily propagated from seed, and can be furnished by millions ; cheap as corn fodder. Fraxinus Sambucifolia—Black Ash. For merely a shade and ornamental tree, perhaps preferable to White Ash; will grow best on ground too wet for White Ash; will flourish and develop magnificently on ground too wet for most ‘any other timber except it may be Tamarac. Populus Angulata, or Populus Monilifera—Cottonwood. The highly refined, fastidious and aristocratic element of our large towns and cities, unite in despising this noble tree. But who cares? It has its own merits, merits that will cause it to be propagated, cherished, nournished and protected by willing hands and loving hearts, until the great interior treeless region of the North American continent shall have - been reclaimed and become one of the traditions of the past. When the marble monuments vainly erected to perpetuate the memory of the names of its traducers, shall have crumbled into dust ; when even the State Hor- ticultural Society has ceased to exist, even then will this monumental tree shed its blessings and its cotton alike upon the just and unjust. - I propose to stand by the Cottonwood. Whether planted oa a sand bank or a river bottom, in the door yard or in a desert, on the prairie or in the timber, the result is a great, sturdy, healthy forest tree. It is a success, and that’s why people plant it. It don’t fool away years of precious time getting ready to do something, but it is up and coming from the word go. It isemphatically a pioneer tree. This and the White Willow will do more to prepare the way for the cultivation of fruit trees, than any other agencies I can think of. I have enumerated enough of the deciduous trees. I could easily have extended the list to twice its length. But “ Enough is as good as a feast.” Evergreens. I shall not branch out much on STMT had rather wait and hear 12 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. from John Kepner. I desire to say a good word for the Scotch Pine. I find it absolutely hardy, and a thrifty, good grower on the broad prairies of Kandiyohi and Stevens counties; have had them growing out for nearly four years. They always look bright and healthy. They are, un- doubtedly, a good tree to plant by the road-side. It is the great lumber tree of Scandinavian nations of northern Europe. It delights in buffet- ing old Boreas; is admirably adapted for wind-breaks, and will be used — extensively for this purpose just as fast as the prairie farmer becomes able to pay for it. I have experimented with various sorts of evergreens on the prairies, and have had more comfort from the Scotch Pine than all others com- bined. The European Larch, about which volumes have been written, has so far proved hardy, healthy, and a rapid grower on the main line of the St. Paul & Pacific railroad, where it has been planted as an experiment in different localities and on widely varying soils. From experience so gained, I should not be afraid to go in tolerably heavy on the European Larch. HOW TO PLANT THEM. It is all surplusage trying to tell this crowd how to plant trees. You know as much about it as I do; but it may be this paper may fall into hands not so experienced as yours. And so I commence by saying, the first thing to do, is to prepare the ground. In commencing de novo on the prairie, Ishould first break the sod in June. I should let it sweat till Oc- tober. I would then back-set it, bringing up two or three inches of new ground. (J am supposing you are preparing to plant along the highway the whole length of your farm.) In the spring I would plant it to pota- toes. I prefer potatoes for this purpose, because the ground gets worked over more in growing this crop than any other you would be likely to plant. After digging the potatoes in September, I would then plough the ground as deep as I possibly could; the deeper the better. And then I would harrow thoroughly. I would have all the holes dug before I took up a tree, and I would dig big holes, not very deep, but a good ways across; deep enough so you can throw in dirt, good mellow black soil, forming a little mound in the bottom of the hole to set the treeon. Then, while an assistant holds the tree in an upright position, manipulate the fine, soft, mellow earth all among the roots, spreading them out fulllength, so they nestle and lay comfortable like and natural. If any of the roots are bruised and mangled, trim them off smoothly with a sharp knife, and also cut out all dead roots. Too much care cannot be exercised in transplanting forest trees. In taking them up get all the root you can, especially small fibrous roots. Don’t allow the roots to be exposed to sun or wind. Don’t let them freeze while out of the ground. Plan your work so as to have the least possible number of hours intervene from the time the tree is lifted from its native spot till it is in the ground again. Should unavoidable delays occur, heel them in, or better still, bury them all over in loose earth, taking them out as you plant them. After getting the roots com- fortably arranged, shovel the fine, black, mellow soil in, pressing it firmly. You don’t want to tramp it. I think most good sized trees, especially the Cottonwood, do better planted somewhat deeper than they originally stood. Don’t drown your trees with water. Many people heave in several FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 13 buckets of water in each hole.: This is unnecessary. Your tree don’t want to stand in a mortar bed. More trees are killed by too much water than by too little. If possible, mulch thoroughly as soon as planted. Mulch with any good manure. Chip manure is best. Old hay or straw is good. If the ground is reasonably moist’ when the planting is done, good, ‘thorough mulching will protect the tree from drought far more effectually than indiscriminate bucketfuls of cold water. Cold wateris a good thing in its place, but needs to be used with some judgment. AN Don’t mutilate your trees. This trimming up to bare poles and_ then. cutting the top off may be necessary in very exposed localities, as-too much top resists the wind to such an extent as to loosen the hold of the roots to the soil. This won't do. In such localities plant small trees. A tree no larger than a rawhide riding-whip, with its full complement of fibrous roots, will soon get away trom such trees as are usually planted along highways; provided, always, you plant it in ground which has been thoroughly prepared, and then give it the same care, protection and cul- tivation you do your corn when you get fifty bushels per acre. If I was in a hurry, and couldn’t wait, and must have big trees at once, I would take up root enough so there would be no necessity of cutting off the top; only trimming the top into symmetry. It would be, perhaps, necessary to steady and brace it against the wind until well rooted. How to do this your own ingenuity should suggest. AFTER CARE. In planting a line of shade trees along a public highway, I should aim to dedicate a strip of ground at least one rod wide to this purpose. - I should plough that strip and harrow it at least twice each year, between May and August, keeping down all weeds and grass. Every year I should work themulching when well decayed, into the ground, replacing it from year to year, until the tree is firmly established and able to help itself to. food and drink. Bear in mind that a young tree needs care, protection, food and water,as much as a young steer, and the better treatment either gets, the better it grows and prospers. The mulching and cultivation is to the tree what corn, hay and water is to the steer. I cannot too strongly condemn the infamous and brutal treatment given to trees by men who ought to know and to do better. The man who handles trees in transplanting, as he would fence rails or posts, de- serves to lose them, and generally does. To illustrate: last spring I saw a large box of ornamental trees, mostly evergreens, on the platform at Willmar. After lying there exposed to wind and sun several days, I saw them opened. The moss and other mulch they were packed in had pre- vented the roots from drying, and had they at once been properly planted, could have been saved. It seemed a whole neighborhood had clubbed together, and each one’s package was bound up separately. These pack- ages were taken from the box and laid on the platform, where, for several days they were exposed to drying winds and scorching sun. They were all killed within twelve hours; but those fellows would come every day or two and carry off a bundle and plant them, all the same; and you can’t make one of them believe that a nurseryman is any better than a horse thief. We must preach to the people that a tree, if not exactly animal, is, at least, a living, breathing organism, as susceptible to good or bad treat- 14 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. ment as anybody; as quick to appreciate good treatment as you or I, and as quick to resent bad treatment. In fact, there are few classes of living beings who tolerate less bad treatment than trees. WHEN TO PLANT—SPRING OR FALL? This is a question often asked. Ido not consider it of as much im- portance asmany do. It is not half as important as a thorough prepa- ration of the soil, mulching and thorough cultivation. With most forest trees it really makes but little difference. For several years I have planted largely, commencing in the fall as soon as the leaves fall; plant- ing until winter comes, heeling in or burying what is left, and in the spring commencing again and planting right along till 20th of May, or until the leaves start. Some seasons there is no perceptible difference between spring and fall planting of most varieties of trees. Should it set in very dry, as it sometimes does early in spring, and continue dry for several weeks, your spring planting will suffer to a certain extent, limited, however, by the amount of mulching and cultivation the trees receive during the season of trial. Should there be a reasonable supply of moisture during the spring and early summer, no appreciable differ- — ence would be likely to be observed. Large sized trees, whether planted in the fall or in the spring, will quite frequently go through the first season making a good, healthy, vigorous growth, and if June and July of the next season is unusually hot and dry, succumb to the withering influences of the season. This, however, is largely prevented by mulch- ing or cultivation. Small forest trees, one, two and three year old, usually, and so far as my experience goes, have always escaped this peril. I have sometimes thought the transplanting of large forest trees from the forest to the open prairie, more hazardous in the fall than in the spring. Sometimes facts prove it to be so, and then again facts prove it not to be so. The fact is, you can’t most always tell. With a thorough preparation of the soil, and prompt, clean culture, your trees, if properly handled and planted, will, asa rule, outlive the fellow that plants them. There are many other varieties of forest trees not enumerated in the foregoing paper, which deserve notice as eminently worth cultivating on the “Tree Claim.” There are others well worth trying, some of which, although thus far having nearly failed, will yet, under more favorable conditions and with more skillful culture, become acclimated and accus- tomed to their new homes, and ultimately add largely to the value and attractions of the prairie regions. The following valuable paper, from the pen of Prof. N. H. Winchell, which I extract trom “Transactions of Minnesota State Horticultural Society, 1875,” gives a good idea of the varieties of forest timber indigenous to the soil and climate of Minnesota. | NOTES ON THE BIG WOODS. BY N. H. WINCHELL—READ BY PROF. LACY. “The Big Woods” of Minnesota, consist of a southward spur from the forest- covered portion of the State, covering a strip about forty-five miles wide in the centre of the State, and reaching nearly to the Iowa Stateline. By this spur, the prairies of the State, at least, those in the southern part, are divided into two parts, the greater of which lies on the west of the Big Woods. The great material advantage the farmers of Minnesota occupying the prairies, have over those who, FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. ery sep in other States are much further removed from timber, is easily seen, while others, who prefer timbered land to prairie, have the choice of thousands of acres yct unoccupied in the region of the Big Woods. The boundary of this southern pro- longation of the northern timber, is not well marked, the trees gradually becom- ing thinner and smaller, and more and more restricted to the valleys of streams, — till the country is changed to a treeless prairie. Around the outskirts of the woods, small oaks and aspens constitute almost the only arboreal vegetation ; but, within the woods, a great variety of hardy, deciduous trees are found, mingled with the usual species of shrubby vegetation. The general surface is much more rolling than in the prairie region, on the east or west, and the soil seems to be coarser, with more frequent boulders. Yet, there are, also, extensive flat tracts in the Big Woods, that are as level as any prairie region. In general, the Big Woods may be thus bounded: Beginning a few miles west of Minneapolis, the eastern edge of the Big Woods crosses the Minnesota, in a line toward Lakeville, in Dakota county. Continuing in a southerly direction, it passes about a mile east of Cannon City, and of Owatonna, when it takes a short bend to the west and northwest, passing about four miles north of Waseca, and near East Janesville, in Waseca county. In Blue Earth county, it is variously modified by the valleys, that are tributary to Minnesota from the south. Contin- uing west, about six miles south of South Bend, it turns north and crosses the Minnesota, sending out a spur northwestward, which follows, indefinitely, the Minnesota valley. Running along the west side of the Minnesota, distant from it about four miles, it begins to bear off toward the northwest, at St. Peter, and passes five miles west of Henderson. Between Arlington and New Auburn, in Sibley county, the timber line is on the east of the direct line. Near the former village, about four miles north, are some large patches of timber, containing large oaks on the west of the main road, and the line seems to swell several miles to -the west, but at Arlington, the timber is entirely on the east of the town. Be- tween New Auburn and Glencoe, the timber line runs about a mile east of the main road, and about three miles east of Glencoe. It is found again, at four miles north of Glencece. Thence, it continues west and northwest, to Darwin, on the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad. North of that, its exact location has not been traced. It seems to run still northwestwardly, and to include the region of small lakes, in Pope, Douglas and Otter Tail counties, and the region known as the Leaf Moun- tains, in the wooded portion. North of the St. Paul and Pacific Railroad, the Big Woods widen out rapidly, both to the east and west, merging into the general forest of the northern part of the State. The term is strictly, and originally, only applicable to the spur that includes the Lower Minnesota valley, extending nearly to the Iowa line. The writer has crossed the spur in a number of directions. In passing from Farmington, in Dakota county, to Shakopee, in Scott county, the fol- lowing species of trees and shrubs were seen. For ten or twelve miles after en- tering the woods, very few large trees were seen, the oak shrubs being the largest, and almost the only tree-like vegetation. About half way to the Minnesota river, the maple and large elms, bass and iron-wood appear. Trees and Shrubs of the Big Woods. Oak shrubs. Apparently Quercus ilicifolia. Wang. Hazelnut. Corylus rostrata. Ait. (?) Bur Oak. Quercus macrocarpa. Michx, White Oak.” Quercus alba, L. Wild Red Cherry. Prunus Pennsylvanica. UW. Trembling Aspen. Populus tremuloides. Michx. Choke Cherry. Prunus Virginiana. L. Wild Plum. Prunus Americana. Marshall. White Ash. Fraxinus Americana. L. Thorn. Crataegus. Rose. Rosa blanda. Ait. June Berry. Amelanchier Canadensis. Var. Botryapium. Torr. and Gray. Round-leaved Cornel. Cornus circinata. Her. Common Elder. Sambucus Canadensis. L. American Crab-apple. Pyrus coronaria. L. oan young twigs and the under surface of the leaves are very woolly pubes- cent. Black Cherry. Prunus serotina. Ehr. 16 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. _ Frost Grape. Vitis cordifolia. Michx. American Elm. Ulmus Americana. L. (Pl. Clayt.) Willd. High-bush Cranberry. Viburnum opulus. L. Two or three species of Willow. Salix. Green Ash. Fraxinus Vividis. Michx. f. Prickly Ash. Zanthoxylum Americanum. Mill. Cockspur Thorn. Crataegus Crus-galli. L. Red Raspberry. Rubus strigosus. Michx. Black Currant. Ribes floridum. L. : Cottonwood. Populus monilifera. Ait. Large-toothed Aspen. Populus grandidentata. Michx. Bass. Tilia Americana. ; Red Mulberry. Morus rubra. L. Ironwood. Ostrya Virginica. Willd. Sugar Maple. Acer Saccharinum. Wang. Soft Maple. Acer rubrum. L. Alternate-leaved Cornel. Cornus alternifolia. L. Bitternut. Carya amara, Nutt. _[Rare, east of Spring Lake. ] Butternut. Juglins cinerea. L. [Very rare, except at Spring Lake and westward. ] Slippery Elm. Ulmus fulva. Michx. Staghorn Sumac. Rus typhina. L. Tamarac. Larix Americana. Michx. Box Elder. Negundo aceroides. Moench. Wolfberry. Symphoricarpus occidentalis. R. Br. Panicled Cornel. Cornus puniculata. L’Her. [The most common species of Cornel. ] Between Shakopee and Mankato, the following additional species were seen in the valley of the Minnesota: _Kentucky Coffee Tree. Gymnocladus canadensis. Lam. Red Cedar. Juniperus Virginiana. Black Walnut. Juglans nigra. L. Hackberry. Celtis occidentalis. L. Blue Beech. Carpinus Americana. Michx. Yellow or Gray Birch. Betula lutea. Michx. f. [This birch has oblong catkins, and spreading obtuse lobes on the scales, the latter being three lines long. The hickory grows to about six inches in diameter, and then is invariably winter-killed. A large tract has lately been cut for fuel, near St. Peter. The hackberry is used for fuel, and for furniture. It frequents the heaviest timber. The butternut, is rarely large. The box-elder, sometimes exceeds three feet in diameter. In the absence of the sugar maple, its sap is used in the Upper Minnesota valley, by the Sioux Indians, for making sugar and syrup, of which, it is said to furnish a very fine quality. ] In traveling through the Big Woods, in 1874, the white birch, (Betula alba var. populifolia spach,) was noted in Hennepin and Carver counties. The bittersweet, (Celastrus scandens, L.) is, also, abundant in the Big Woods. There is a species of oak, that appears like red oak, (Quercus rubra, L.), that frequents the outskirts of the Big Woods. It is sometimes associated with the burr oak, in the “openings,” and sometimes is found in company with the trembling aspen. It makes a smal- ler tree, generally, than the burr oak. Besides these, the Virginia creeper, (Am- pelopsis quinquefolia. Michx.) and the blackberry, (Rubus villosus, Ait.), have been seen. At Jordan, in the valley of the Minnesota, the black raspberry was noted, (Rubus occidentalis, L.) The white pine grows near Minneapolis, (Pinus strobus, L.), and in Mower county ; it is found along the rocky banks of the streams in Mower county. The black ash, (Fraxinus sambucifolia, Lam.), has, also, been ob- served in the Big Woods; but, it seems not to be common. The red-berried elder, (Sambucus pubens, Michx.), has been seen at Minneapolis ; also, the sweet vibur- num, ( Vibwrnum Lentago, L.), and the strawberry bush, (Huonymus Americanus, L.) Two species of spirwa, the ninebark, (Spirea opulifolia, L.) and the common meadow-sweet spirea salicifolia, L., were noted at St. Peter. Although, according to the foregoing boundary of the southern end of the Big Woods, they extend, en masse, only to about the center of Blue Earth county, the FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 17 area of continuous timber is extended considerably further south, through the agency of the valleys of the Blue Earth, the Cobb, and the Maple rivers;—tribu- taries of the Minnesota, that run northward froin the water-shed, that lies alon the southern State boundary line. Consequently, there is more than the usual: amount of timber, for prairie lands, in Faribault and Freeborn counties. In: those counties, as the suppression of the prairie fires is rendered more complete, by the forming of the soil, the scattering shrubs of oak, and the aspens, that are avant couriers of encroaching forests, bring on more and more the character and aspect of a wooded country. Other species then gradually venture out from the sheltered valleys, and flourish on the open tracts. It is in some of these more southerly spurs from the main body of the Big Woods, that the shag-bark hickory (Carya alba., Nut.) sometimes appears. The existence of this great spur of timber, shooting so far south from the boun- dary line, separating the southern prairies from the northern forests, and its suc- cessful resistance against the fires that formerly must have raged annually on: both sides, is a phenomenon in the natural history of the State that challenges the scrutiny of all observers. While it holds mines of wealth, open to the prac- tical economist, it affords to the scientist a rich field for observation and study. With timber, comes the fauna, that is peculiar, in our latitude, to timbered regions. This fauna, is strikingly different from that of the prairies. The bear, the wolf, the deer, a great number of forest warblers, and numberless winged in- sects, that would otherwise be restricted to the northern half of Minnesota, are, by this spur of timber, brought into a much more southern latitude. The deer, at present, roams over the whole of this tract, from north to south. It furnishes shelter for thousands of birds that winter among us, but which, otherwise, would become exterminated, or driven from the State. It has, also, its climatic effect, and its sanitary influence. It is eminently a region of small lakes. What may ‘be the cause underlying, that has wrought this wonderful diversity in the heart of our great State, is a subject for legitimate investigation, but the limits of this paper do not permit me to enter on that. It is only possible here to give a few notes, and to call attention to some of the salient points. That this tract is des- tined to be one of untold benefit to the State, cannot be questioned. It is as yet but sparsely inhabited, and the details of its natural history are unknown. The following have been noticed by Mr. L. M. Ford: Two varieties of the wild gooseberry, (Clematis Virginiana,) a well known climber, blooming in August; the Dutchman’s pipe, (Arestolochia sypho,) another climber; one variety of the honeysuckle, (Lonicera ;) the leather wood, (Dirca palustris,) a dwarf sort of thorn, heavily laden with fruit in autumn, probably Crataegus coccinea, and near Minne- apolis, the trailing juniper, (Juniperus prostrata.) The first report of the commissioner of statistics, of Minnesota, (1860), gives the following account of the natural distribution of its timber. “ The Great Coniferous Districtc—The elevated and broken region, north of lati- tude 46°, and east of the meridian of the outlet of Red Lake, may be described in general terms, as a forest country; these lines, in general, being the southern and western limits of the pine, and other conifers, in Minnesota, and including an area of 21,000 square smiles. Pine is the prevailing wood of this district, but in- termingled with a considerable proportion of birch, maple, aspen, ash and elm. The alluvial bottoms of the extreme northern branches of the Mississippi, support a heavy growth of basswood, elm, aspen, butternut, ash, birch, hard and soft maples, linden, balsam-fir,and some oaks. It is observed, that whenever the cone-bearing woods are burned off in this district, the hard woods take their place. The sugar-maple, which, according to Blodgett, marks the range of Indian corn, extends northward nearly to Rainy Lake, where it yields abundance of sugar to the Indians. In the Red River Valley, the sugar-maple is found all along its trough, and finds its northern limit beyond the 49th parallel, on the elevated southern water-shed of Lake Winnipeg. On the rivers flowing into Lake Superior, hemlock, cedar, spruce, fir, and birch prevail The Zone of Pine—The principal pine forests of Minnesota, which constitute one of main resources of industry and wealth, stretch in a broad belt near the southern border of the great northern forest district, from the eastern side of Pine county, in the Upper Saint Croix Valley, northwestward across the water- shed to the outlet of Red Lake. The principal pineries where lumber is bought, are upon the headwaters of Kettle, Snake, Rum, Crow-Wing, and the Upper Mis- 2 18 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL sississippi, and recently, upon the extreme upper waters of, the Red, or Otter Tail . river. a Belt of Oak Openings.—Below latitude 46°, the pine, Rendle spruce, birch, and- all the Conifere, generally disappear with the forest-line. A narrow range of cedar and tamarack swamps, between Saint Croix and Crow Wing rivers, and. some pine, mingled with large maple, oak, ash, and small birch and spruce, inter- vene for half a degree further, when the oak becomes the prevailing treeonthe’ _ . uplands, distributed in groves ‘and large parks, its growth usually dwarfed by the annual ravages of prairie fires. These oak openings characterize the whole delta — 7H of rolling prairie, below latitude 45° on the east side of the Mississippi. The soft. maple, elm, ash, willow, and alder, line the bottoms of the Rum and Elk rivers., ee There are no compact forests in this sec tion, except upon the Saint Croix Valley, where a dense mass of hard-woods, in which the sugar-maple prevails, occupies the upper part of Washington and. Chisago counties to the pine belt, in Pine county. The Bois Franc, or Big Woods.—West. of the Mississippi, the western flank of. the great coniferous forest of the north, extending with a thick border of hard- wood west of Otter Tail River, and around Otter ‘ Tail Lake, terminates upon the lie valley of the Crow Wing, where it merges its characteristics. in anew forest growth of the deciduous forms, which stretches in a broad angular belt across the great prairies of the southeast and south, and generally known as the Big Woods. ~~ This belt wood forms a deep fringe, of from ten to twenty miles in width, along ~ the western slope of the Mississippi, from the Crow Wing Valley to the Sauk, at Saint Cloud. Crossing into the valley of the Crow River, and keeping a general south-easterly course, it occupies a large strip of country between the Mississippi and Minnesota rivers, nearly one hundred miles on its longest side, with an-aver-" age breadth of forty miles; its western limit being formed by a line crossing the counties of McLeod and Meeker, diagonally through the middle, and its.eastern, ~ by a line drawn from near the mouth of Rum river to Carver, on the Minnesota. — Throwing its left flank across the Minnesota, at Louisville, its main body crosses the river between Belle Plain and Le Sueur, and covers nearly the whole of Le. Sueur county, with its right wing extending south-westward to Blue Earth. River; in Blue Earth county, and its left occupying about one-half of Rice and Scott counties. The area of the tract of country covered by the Big Woods, is about 5,000 square smiles, of which 4,000 is occupied by the division north of ‘the Min- nesota, and 1,000 by its southern division. The woodland district is full of lakes, . and, in some ‘sections, the dense mass of forest is broken by-small prairies. The. F varieties of timber in this district are mainly oak, maple, elm, ash, basswood,. black walnut, and hickory. ; Southern Belt of Valley Woods and Oak Openings.—Besides the tract above de- © ; scribed, there are no large forests in Minnesota, west of the Mississippi. But, nearly all the streams have narrow fringes of woodlands, and some of the valleys east are dense masses of timber. The wide bottoms of Minnesota and Mississippi. have a deep border of thick and massive woods, in which the large cottonwood and maple are conspicuous, with white and black walnut, butternut, linden. box- wood and hickory. The Zumbro Valley,.Wabashaw and Dodge counties, sup- port some large tracts of forest growth. The Root Biver also affords a consider- able body of thick woods on the borders of Fillmore and Olmstead counties, in which all the varieties of the Big Woods are reproduced. But the oak-openings and groves which are scattered through the uplands along the streams form a large resource of the prairie population for domestic and mechanical purposes. The Sparcely Wooded District—The Upper Valley of the Minnesota and Red River sustains no forest-growth, except upon the trough of the main and tributary streams and the margins of the lakes. The minor streams of the Upper Missis- sippi, are, however, poorly timbered,a few scattering trees only marking their course over the naked plain. On the Red River, a narrow fringe of thick woods of the hard varieties, com- mences at Graham’s Point, and continues to Pembina, while all the streams on the east and west sides afford narrow strips of timber, generally from fifteeen to twenty-five miles apart, while the intermediate plains above latitude 46°, are dotted with clumps of poplars, willows, and other aspenoids. The foregoing extracts seem to be necessary and valuable in this con- nection, in order to exhibit at a glance the natural home of the different forest trees of Minnesota. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 19 I give it, simply as my own experience in forest-growing on the prairies ; that it pays, to conform to the natural habits ot the trees ; that is, 1 would plant the Black Walnut, Butiw-..uut, Black Ash, Basswood, Elm, &c., in a deep, moist, rich, soul, instead of on high, dry, poorish soil. And I would plant the Pines, White Ash, Larch, &c., on lighter, dryer soils. I would carry this idea into practice in the planting of a tree claim ; giving each particular variety, as near as possible, the same sort of soil, location, &c., as where the finest growths are found in the native forests. We will now give some attention to the individual character of forest trees, from Dr. Hough’s report, pp. 556 to 566. I find much valuable information, which he credits to the Lowa State Horticultural Society. This society, in 1872, began to otter premiums to encourage tree-plant- ing, and it has for the past four years, printed annually, for gratuitous distribution among planters, a pamphlet, containing instructions for procuring, storing, and planting o1 seeds, cuttings and plants, with hints on best species and varieties, modes ot culture, &c., for artificial forests and shelter-belts in that State. The importance of this subject has been also frequently discussed for many years, as well in the public journals, as by speakers at agricultural and horticultural fairs, so that it may be truly said of Iowa, that no State in the Union has so generally been awakened to the importance of _tree-planting. In fact, the great prairies needed no argument to prove the desirability of planting, as well for fences and fuel, as for shelter and ornament. The statistical result of these labors will be found on another page in this volume. Some of the practical suggestions of the Annual, which appear to be of more general interest, are here given: SHELTER-BELTS. These are wind-breaks for the shelter of domestic animals and crops, and their advantages are set forth by Judge C. E. Whiting, one of the committee charged with the preparation of the Annual, trom his own experience, (perhaps the most extensive of any person in the country in this branch ot forestry,) as follows: *T have, in belts around my fields, varying from single to twenty rows of trees, mostly planted 4,356 to the acre, about 40 acres of timber. The trees in these belts vary as to time of planting; some are eighteen years old, and some only one year planted ; the greater portion, however, are trom five to twelve years of age. ‘The needed thinning of these belts furnishes all the wood that is wanted on the farm, including stakes and rails to keep the fences in repair, posts for all repairs needed, and many for new fences, I annually build in extending my farm. When my walnuts get a little larger, I will have all I need, and many tor sale. There is not astick of needed timber on the farm, from a pea-brush, a grapevine-stake, or a binding-pole, up to a fair-sized saw-log, that cannot be had from my groves, without cutting a single tree that does not need thinning out from the groves. * About five miles of my timber belts are so planted, that I have commenced using the standing trees for fence-posts. Where a tight tence is not needed, with the use of the barbed wire, and a little change in the staple, the use of these live posts is a perfect success. Strongly and urgently as I have heretofore advocated the planting of thick belts of timber around our fields, each year but confirms me in the opinions then expressed. The land that remains, will, year after year, produce larger and more certain crops than the whole field would produce with- out such protection. I also repeat, that, in spite of all the learned discussions and scientific theorizing in regard to the cause of our timberless prairies, our cultivated forest trees, year atter year, grow right along, with immense rapidity, in blissful ignorance of all the reasons why they should not grow.” i Foresty Annual of the lowa Horticultural Society. Four numbers of this have been published, be. ginning in 1874. The pamphlet for 1877, embraces 24 pages. 90 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL: The species of trees used in shelter-belts, either on the farm boundaries to the north and west; or, to the north and west of dwelling, barns, orchard, garden, &c., will depend greatly on the position of the homestead, as to soil and location in the State. The settler, absolutely without tree-shelter, wishes, naturally, to reach results as quickly as possible. Fortunately, the willow, the cottonwood, the silver poplar, and the box-elder, are all very easy to propagate ; as noted in speak- ing of varieties, are all wonderfully rapid in growth under good cultivation ; and, above all, are perfectly hardy, even in the north-western part of the State. Taking all things into consideration, it is best to put these rampant growers on the out- side of belts, adding from year to year the varieties, like elm, ash, black cherry, honey-locust, the evergreens, &c., as time and means permit, inside of the iron- clad vanguards placed on the outside. The rapid-growing soft woods, starting readily from cuttings, are the most available for urgent present needs, and the novice in tree-planting, is more certain of success with them in his first efforts, than with rooted plants of the slower-growing, but more valuable timbers. Be- sides, cuttings cost nothing usually, and are readily obtainable. We append notes on managing cuttings in this connection, as these trees are most frequently used in shelter-belt plantations. How to Prepare Cuttings—Very early in winter, before severe freezing, cut in lengths of about a foot. If the limbs to cut are plenty, choose them from three- fourths to one and a half inches in diameter. Cut them at the lower end with a clean cut, sloping at acute angle, to facilitate pressing in the earth when planting. If sharpened on all sides, as is frequently done, roots are emitted less freely from the lower end. Tie in bundles with willows, with the lower ends nicely evened, so that when placed on the ground in the spring, every cutting will touch the moist earth. Pack the cuttings in a dry-goods box, with moist prairie soil, putting the box where it will not get too dry or wet, and will not freeze. With the first wario weather of spring, clean off a spot under an old straw-stack, level the sur- face carefully, and set the bundles butt-end down closely together upon the fresh, moist earth ; then cover them over with straw, so as to keep them from the air. By the time the ground gets warm enough to plant, the base of the cuttings will be softened and calloused, and most of them will have emitted small roots. Mark out your ground one way three feet apart. Plant alternately a row of small-growing corn with a row of cuttings. Put the cuttings in rows six inches apart, at an angle of forty-five degrees, using a clean, narrow spade, and press the earth down firmly with the foot. Cuttings should be put down about the whole length. When they start, allow only one sprout to grow. Cultivate care- fully. The alternate row of corn will nearly pay for the culture, and the follow- ing winter, the stalks will help to hold the snow among the trees. The folowing spring it can be seen how the plants stand in the rows. If the cuttings are pre- pared, kept, and set right, nearly all will grow, and the surplus plants can be taken up and set in other ground. Allow the plants to stand about three feet apart. If many have failed, transplant, so they will set right. As a rule, it is not best to transplant. A tree six years old, and never transplanted, is usually, much the largest. We may here remark, that in addition to the willows, the white and yellow cottonwood, lombardy poplar, large aspen, silver poplar and balm of Gilead, may all be propagated in this way, as noted in speaking of varieties. The instructions for managing cuttings, will, however, not be repeated. We may here, also, note that the red maple, white maple, ash-leaved maple and basswood, may be propagated readily from two-year-old wood, put out in the fall. Cover lightly over the rows, before cold weather, with straw or prairie hay. Rake this off as the plants start in spring. Evergreens for Shelter-belts—In eastern Iowa, nearly all of the hardy evergreens may be grown successfully, and form, beyond all doubt, the most perfect shelter- belts that can be planted. But, in the central and western portions of the State, north of the forty-second parallel, evergreens, even of the hardiest type, need shelter ; yet, this is no reason why they should be. ignored in the perfecting of shelter-belts. For reasons before noted, the rapid-growing soft woods are best for outside planting, and are just what is needed to give requisite exemption from wind-sweep to belts of pines, or spruces planted under their lee. For the portions of the State most in need of shelter-belts, the Scotch pine is, beyond all doubt, the best evergreen for this use in the whole list. We can fully indorse the statement of Prof. C. 8. Sargent, who says: “The rapidity of its growth in all situations, and its economic value, make the FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 21 Scotch pine the most valuable tree farmers can plant for screens and wind-breaks about their fields and buildings, and for this purpose, it is recommended in place of the more generally planted Norway spruce, which, though of rapid growth in its young state, does not promise, in our climate, at least, to fulfill the hopes which were formed in regard to it.” This pine is specially partial to free circulation of air, growing quite feebly in crowded positions; hence, it will not do to plant it as closely as white pine, although, as with other trees, it is best to plant, with a view of thinning out when the poles are of size to be of practical use. We may here remark, that the poles of Scotch and white pine, cut in summer and stripped of bark, are very strong and durable, when nailed on posts for fencing. The white pine will succeed vastly better with outside shelter on the west and north exposures, and will attain height fully as fast as the Scotch pine. Plant in rows eight feet apart, with plants four feet apart. The trees thus crowded will attain height rapidiy, and when the poles attain size for nailing on fence-posts, they will be straight,and nearly uniform in size from end to end. The Norway or white spruce, coming next, may be planted the same as Scotch pine. The white spruce is, perhaps, the most compact and beautiful, but the Norway, is the most rapid in growth, and is the most plentiful 1n the nurseries. Evergreens, twelve to eighteen inches, of all the -sorts here named, may be obtained of leading nurserymen, who make seedlings a specialty, at very low rates. Taking into account the first cost of plant, the loss from shipping, dying out, &c., the chances for success, with the ordinary farmer, are too doubtful, except on a small scale, for the shelter of home buildings, where the addition to the landscape view, summer and winter, will well repay the cost of purchase, and after care, saying nothing of their perfect effectiveness in arresting wind and storm. The deciduous trees, such as we specify as valuable for farm uses, are good enough for shelter-belts, and the annual thinnings are far more valuable for varied uses. Our main idea. under the heading of shelter-belts, is to recommend strongly the planting of all forest trees as shelter-belts, rather than in the form of isolated squares, as is too common. Plant any of the kinds named in the suc- ceeding list, but plant in the order suggested, as many trees do famously well, planted east or south of a heavy belt of hardier trees, which would utterly fail in open exposure to wind-sweeps. PLANTATIONS FOR FUEL, FARM USES, AND MANUFACTURING PUR- POSES. To economize space, we place the varieties of trees best suited for these varied purposes under one heading, making comments as to relative value for specific purposes and management of each timber tree separately. _ Green Asu (Fraxinus viridis.)—For fuel, and for all the manifold uses for which light, firm, elastic, and durable timber is wanted, as well as handsome, light-col- ored finishing lumber, the white and green ash are our most valuable trees, and their greatest value is attained when grown on deep, rich soil. The white ash, (F. Americana), in our dry atmosphere, and sometimes very dry soil, makes com- paratively slow growth, while green ash, on soils favorable for our best corn crops, will, in ten years, be as large as the ash-leaved maple (Negundo aceroides) of same age. For all uses, its timber is very similar to white ash, with which it is con- founded by most of our citizens. It grows in many parts of Iowa, while the white ash is not common. The seeds ripen in October, and soon fall after frost. A good way to keep them, is to place them on the surface of a garden walk, put- ting a box over them, and cutting a trench around the box to keep water from running under them. They will not grow if kept too dry. With most people, it will be best to purchase the plants of nurserymen, or to cultivate the first year in aseed-bed. Usually, about one-fifth of the seed grows. Transplant where they are to grow at one year old. It is, however, better for the trees to plant the seed where the trees are to grow, say six or eight seeds in a hill. They will then retain their tap-root and grow with more vigor, but will require more hoeing. How to Plant.—After deep plowing and thorough horrowing, mark the ground, as for corn. If seeds are planted, cover shallow, not more than an inch. If transplanting, press a clean, bright spade about two-thirds its length perpendic- ularly at each intersection of the marks, then draw the handle back, so as to move the bottom of the spade three or four inches forward, then press in the _ Spade the balance of its length, and push the handle forward, which will leave 22, FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. an ample hole to receive the roots; after the spade is withdrawn, tramp the ground firmly on the roots, and leave the plant standing perpendicular. Honey-Locust (Gleditschia triacanthos).—It is thought by many to be the best to select the seed for timber-growing purposes from thornless trees; yet, it often happens that nearly all the plants from seeds gathered from very thorny trees, will prove thornless, if kept thriftily growing. On account of rapidity of growth and value of timber for fuel, posts, furniture, &c., we regard this native tree as being very valuable. In some of the interior counties remote from the river bot- toms, where this tree is found native. the idea secms common that this tree, like the common black locust, is subject to attacks of the borer, and is, also. liable to sprout, &c. For the benefit of this quite numerous class, it may be well to state, that honey locust—or, more properly, three-thorned acacia—is nearly allied to the Kentucky coffee-tree botanically, and that the borer has not been known to attack it ; nor does it sprout to greater extent than the maple, and most other forest trees. The seed ripens in autumn, and may be gathered any time during the fall or winter. But the sooner pods are gathered after falling to the ground the better. In Cedar county, on Cedar river, and at many points on the Iowa. Des Moines, Missouri, and inc*ed, most of the rivers of the State, pods may be gathered in quantity grown o> thornless trees. Before planting, scald the seeds severely. Part of them will swell. Sift these out with a coarse fanning-mill sieve. Scald the remainder again ; repeatedly scalding and sifting, until all are swelled. The ground should be ready, and the seeds at once planted. They will come up in two or three days, if the weather be favorable, and their upright growth is so rapid, that less care is needed in picking out weeds from among the plants, than with any other forest-tree seedlings. Keep the weeds down carefully with good culture during the summer. Take up the plants in the fall and heel in carefully where water will not stand. If left stand- ing in seed-bed, the plants are often injured during the winter. After the first year, the plants are perfectly hardy, if seed from our native trees be used. We may here note, that the seed sold in the eastern markets is mostly imported. The plants produced from the foreign honey-locust seed prove as tender in our climate as the peach tree. No valuable tree in our list bears transplanting with as little check to growth, as the honey-locust. Put out the plants with a spade, as recom- mended for the ash. Buack CuHerry (Cerasus serotina).—The great value of this tree for posts, fuel, manufacturing, &c., has been too much overlooked. Plantations in this State, and in Illinois, demonstrate it to be one of our mest desirable trees for cultivation, at- taining a size in 12 years about equal to scarlet maple, with same care. When planted thickly, say in rows 4 feet apart and 18 inches apart in row, the poles run up tall and straight. The trees taken out in thinning can be utilized for poles to nail on posts for fence. Cut in summer, when they will dry quickly, they will last many years. When used for posts, if thoroughly dried, the writer has found them to last as long as the best burr-oak. He has posts yet sound that have been set 15 years, and made from trees only 10 to 12 inches in diameter. The seed may he gathered in most of our groves and thickets. Wash off the pulp, dry the sur- face of the pits in the sun, then pack in pure sand, in small boxes or nail kegs. If kept in cellar, where they will not get too dry, they will grow; or they may be buried where they may be severely frozen. In the latter case, they will be found to germinate very early in spring, and must he sown before much started. Plant and manage same as ash. If planted where wanted, all the better, as transplant- ing sadly retards growth, European Larcnu (Larix Europxa).—In Europe, this is regarded as their most val- uable forest tree for artificial groves. It is esnecially grown for railroad ties, posts, vine stakes, fencing, fuel, and about all the economic uses of the farm, and even in the shipyard; whole ships having been constructed of larch timber. It is, in our country, one of the most rapid growers we have, under proper treatment. But we may suggest that a careless manager had better select some other tree. The indications are that it will not prove as desirable here as in Europe, perhaps mainly on account of too rapid growth on rich soils. On their clay soils it pro- duces a better grade of timber. Purchase plants that have been once transplanted. Be sure to secure the plants very early in the snring. The leaves start very early, and the plants should be in the ground before this occurs. If much started, they can hardly be saved in the open air, unless the weather be very fivorable. Remember that it will not bear exposure of root, any more than the evergreens. In planting keep the roots FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 23 in mud and water, under no circumstances allowing them to get even partially dry. Plant the same as ash and honey-locust. For the first year or two after transplanting, they will be found to make very moderate growth. After that they climb up rapidly. The ash and locust will need thorough culture but two years. The larch will not shade the ground as early, and will need four years of careful culture. We will add, if plants of two years’ growth be purchased, that have not been transplanted from the seed-bed, do not think of setting in the open field. Plant quite closely in bed, and give partial shade for one or two years. It pays to grow larch, but the idea must be kept constantly in mind that when young it is very delicate and tender under our dry air and hot sun, and must be handled in all respects like young evergreens, with the additional care that it must be transplanted very early in spring. Brack anp Waite Watnur (Juglans nigra and J. cinerea)—These are well- known and valuable trees, especially the black walnut. They do not transplant without great check of growth, and the nuts, therefore, should be planted where wanted for belt or grove. Judge C. E. Whiting, of this committee, who has had more experience in grow- ing this timber than any man, probably, in the West, reports as follows: ‘If I were to plant a section of timber for an investment for my children, I would have it all black walnut—a tree will grow to sawing size sooner than pine, and even now in our markets it is quoted at three times the price of pine. It is very durable, if put in the ground dry, for posts. Fifteen years ago I planted - eedar and walnut posts at the same time, and also posts of white oak. All are ‘now decayed about equally. Always plant the walnut where you want it. Will transplant well, but loses, in losing its tap-root, years of growth. Seven bushels ‘of walnuts, with the shucks on, will plant an acre. During the winter I put in ‘trenches, not too. thick, and cover with leaves.” . ~ Plant before sprouting if possible. Mark the ground out as for ash, and plant the nuts early and deep so that they will not dry. YeLLow Corronwoop (Populus monilifera).—The opinion is common in central ‘and eastern Iowa, that cottonwood is only valuable on the prairies for wind- breaks, as the wood has little value for fuel or for any uses of tne farm or work- shop. The variety, if it be merely a variety, abundant on the Missouri, and also found sparingly on the DesMoines, Iowa, Cedar, &v., in central and eastern Iowa, ‘known as yellow cottonwood, really has an economic value, aside from its value for shelter belts, that should be better understood by our prairie settlers. Bryant says of this variety: “Its heart-wood is of a yellowish color, not unlike that of the tulip tree. It grows in the same situation as others of its kind, and is split with- out difficulty into rails. Shingles have been manufactured from it, which lasted a considerable time.” When sawed into lumber it does not warp like the cotton- wood generality. If Populus angulata and P. monilifera are really distinct, it is a matter of uncertainty to which this variety belongs. The subject should be in- vestigated.” Judge C. E. Whiting has grown ‘this tree extensively for a number of years on the Missouri bottom in Monona county, and has expressed his views as follows: “ine - “We have in the Missouri bottom both the white and yellow cottonwood. In speaking of the cottonwood as a valuable timber, I speak alone of the yellow. I have fence-boards of this yellow cottonwood upon my farm that have been in use fifteen years, and they are yet good. My house is sided with cottonwood; has been built ten years, and looks as well as any pine siding in the country, and stays toits place as well. It is really better as fencing than pine, being tougher and stronger. It stays to its place as well,and is equally durable. I need hardly say it has‘no rivai in rapidity of growth, as it far outstrips the willow. Along the bars of the Missouri are millions of seedlings. They grow up upon these bottoms over a great extent like prairie grass. There are enough of them to plant groves over every prairie in the State. I went ten miles from home, and in one day took up 13,000 eighteen to thirty inches in height for my own setting. With vround ready a good hand can set from 2,000 to 3,000 per day. The fall is the best time to get seedlings from the Missouri bottom, on account of the high water in the spring. I set cottonwood posts from old trees in the bottom in the spring of 1860. I moved this fence last fall, and nine-tenths of them are yet good. The yellow cottonwood, split up green and put under a dry shed to dry, is good enough for my folks to use for fuel. “Of my first planting of cottonwood twelve years ago, the best of them now measure sixteen inches in diameter. We would make plantations very thick. I 94 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. now plant 4,356 trees to the acre. Thisshoves them up straight and symmetrical. In this way we get the dead-sure thing on the side-branch business. Cottonwood can be readily grown from seeds. Being upon the river bottom in June, I noticed the cottonwood trees were loaded with seed; had one cut down and ioaded the wagon with branches with the seed attached. I furrowed some ground quite deeply with plow; strewed the limbs in the rows, and my success in growing many thousands of seedlings was most perfect.” ; In the interior sections, where seedlings cannot readily be obtained from the | river bottoms,-the yellow cottonwood may be growa from cuttings about as readily as the willow. The evident advantage would also ensue of propagating the right ~ variety. On the Missouri bottom the seedlings of the common cottonwood are, of course, intermixed with the more valuable variety. CaTaPa.ta (Catapalta bignonoides.)—Experience has demonstrated this tree to have a special value for extended planting. Although naturally a tree indigenous farther south, it seems to have a peculiar tendency to adapt itself to northern limits. A variety now grown quite extensively in central Iowa seems as hardy as any of our native trees. The writer has trees now five years set, large enough for small posts for wire fences, which have had open exposure north of 42d parallel during the past severe winters. In Cedar county are to be seen many trees, which have been out from ten to fifteen years, which show its habit of rapid growth to continue after it attains considerable size. In its native forests it attains consider- able size, growing from 50 to 80 feet in height, with a diameter of from 18 to 25 inches. Its flowers are very showy, and its odd cylindrical pods attract much attention. It is very durable for posts. Posts are yet sound in Illinois which have been set, it is claimed, forty years: The plants are very easy to grow from seeds, which may be kept dry until time for sowing. But in all cases secure seed grown on northern trees. In Cedar county, and near Muscatine, the seeds are quite abundant. The trees flower and bear seeds abundantly when quite young. Waite anp Scotcu Pines (Pinus strobus and P. Sylvestris.) — These have been referred to in this report as very desirable for shelter belts. Our people have been slow to plant them for timber trees as their most evident use as such is for sawed lumber. Admitting this as their special use, several considerations should induce their extended planting: : First—Their rapidity of growth. Very many reported cases of growth on the prairies of white pine, in partially sheltered localities, confirm the statements of relative growths made by D. C. Scofield, of Elgin, Ill. His plants were set when from 6 to 12 inches in height, and after twelve years’ growth he reports European larch 30 feet high and 8 to 12 inches in diameter; and white pine 35 feet in height and 6 to 12 inches through. The writer has white pine trees, twelve to thirteen years planted, 14 inches in diameter and over 30 feet in height. Second—The poles thinned out as before stated are valuable for fencing. Third—An evergreen plantation breaks up the monotony of prairie scenery, and adds in this way a moneyed value to our real estate in case it is offered for sale. Plants of white pine can be bought from dealers, who collect them in the pin- eries, as low as two to three dollars per thousand,in quantity. Such plants should be set in beds for two years, and screened by light brush-covered shed. They may then be set where wanted. Pine and larch may be grown advantageously intermingled in the same plantation. As before noted, the Scotch pine may be judiciously planted as a protection to white pine or larch plantations on west or north sides. Evergreen plants can be procured of parties in Illinois, who grow them from seed and send them out once transplanted at low rates. Robert Dou- glas, of Waukegan, IIl., whose long experience in prairie-tree growing gives a practical value to his opinions, advises the extended planting of white and Scotch pines intermixed with the larch. He says: “Most European planters prefer mixing pines with larches, as this adds to the appearance of the plantation and gives a choice in thinning. We would advise planting a few rows of the admixture on the margin of the plantation, at least, and in all cases where the plantations are placed along the outer boundaries of the farm, we would advise a free admixture of evergreen.” As evergreen plants are usually shipped from a distance, the instructions of Mr. Douglas in regard to handling and setting are appended: “When the trees are received from nurseries, the boxes should be immediately unpacked, and the roots dipped in a puddle made of rich mellow soil, about the thickness* of paint. Place them ina cool shaded place till ready to plant, and while planting expose the roots as little as possible. If not ready to plant for a FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL, 95 few days, keep the roots moist and tops dry. Set the trees a little deeper than they stood in the nursery, and tread the earth firmly about the roots when planting— this is very essential— drawing a little loose earth up to the trees to prevent the sur- face from baking.” Rep Exum* (Ulmus fulva)—This tree has not received the attention it merits from tree planters on our prairies. It is peculiarly a tree adapted: to dry climates, no better proof of which could be found than the fact that it fails to ripen seeds in the humid air of England and France. Its special claims to attention for ex- tended planting may be briefly summed up as follows: - (1) Itis beyond all question hardy, even in the most exposed position on our rairies. = (2) It grows on rich soils with great rapidity. The writer has trees grown from seed in six years larger than box-elder (Negrundo aceroides) of the same age, and receiving the same treatment. (3) The seeds are easy to gather in nearly every portion of the State, and require no more skill in handling and planting than of the soft maple. . (4) No tree in our whole list seems so free from disease and injury from insects, worms, &c. - (5) No tree, not even the larch, has so large a proportion of red or heart-wood when young. Even in the branches of young trees only one or two inches in diameter the perfect wood forms the principal part. (6) Grown thickly in artificial groves, it runs up straight and tall, and when the poles are large enough to split for two rails they divide as freely and easily as young chestnuts, and the rails are about as durable, even when laid up in worm- fence. Nailed on to posts they will last fully as long as white oak. _ (7) When the poles are only large enough for a grape-vine stake, or a small post for wire fence, if cut in summer, peeled, and dried before setting, they will last “longer than burr-oak, set green, from old trees. (8) It is a historical tree of our country, and associated with every memory of the early days, without regard to position, as it. seems the one ubiquitous tree, nearly everywhere present in the native forests of our country. It is among the first in the spring to exhibit its blossoms and hue of cheery green, and in the autumn, with the advent of the early frosts, it presents a display of shaded leaves, running from lightest violet and the deepest crimson, to all shades of orange and yellow. Other things being equal, even beauty has moneyed as well as aesthetic value in the arrangement of the landscape view in tree planting. This special commendation of the red elm may be received with some doubt by those who have given the matter little attention. The idea is not intended to be conveyed that exclusive plantations be made of any one tree. But example and habit have too much influence in guiding tree planting.. The soft maple, for in- instance, has become over our State the popular tree for general planting. Let us suppose the red elm has. become equally popular. It grows as rapidly, it is far hardier, it is freer from insect ravages, it is worth far more for fuel, it is excellent for rails and even posts, its lumber is valuable for stable-floors, bridge-plank, wag- on-hubs, and many other uses, the trees require little if any care in the way of pruning, &c. Ifit couldsupplant the maple the gain would soon be very apparent. The seeds of the elms ripen in May, usually before the trees come into full leaf. The seeds are light, and being surrounded by a membranous wing, they are wide- ly scattered by the wind. Sow at once on gathering, and by all means sow where wanted, if possible. They may be planted in corn-hills'to excellent advantage. They usually grow about one foot in hight the first season. Planting with corn is an advantage, as the plants are sometimes injured when.very young by direct ex- posure to our dry air and hot sun of July and August. The plants transplant read- ily, but if you want rapid growth never break the first tap root. Corky Exo (Ulmus racemosa.—This tree in habit of growth is much like the white elm [Ulmus Americana] but its wood is far more valuable. This elm is so often confounded with the white elm, and is so usually mixed with it in its native haunts, that the masses might fail to get the unmixed seeds. The corky elm will be likely to grow as rapidly as the red elm, but its wood having less value for manifold uses than the latter, its extended culture cannot as yet be advised. For ornament and for shelter, however, we may say the white elm in all its northern variaties is not surpassed. Michaux was right when he said that the white elm was “the most magnificent vegetable of the temperate zone.” Isolated trees for shade or landscape effect, or any of the white elm varieties, are not excelled. The *Sometimes known as the Slippery Elm. 26 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. American elms, as grown from seed, all run into varities puzzling tothe botanist Sirver-"£Ar MAPLE (Acer dasycarpum). —This variety, and also the red maple [Acer rubum], are well known plantation trees in every neighborhood in the West. It is economy of time, and a great increase of growth is ‘attained by plant- ing where wanted as recommended for the ash. But seedings may be transplant- ed readily if plants are readily obtainable. While it is unfortunate for the timber-growing interests of the State that the soft maples of late have been so exclusively planted, we are not willing to advise the total neglect of these trees. Failure often ensues by neglect to gather seeds at just the proper time. When the wild crab-apples are in full blossom the seed is usually just right. Before planting it is best to soak the seeds in water until just ready to sprout. Then place in moist earth. Buack Mapte (Acer nigrum).—This is usually called sugar maple, but its growth is very much more rapid under culture than the Acer saccharinum. For fuel and sugar-making it is specially worthy of culture. For five or six years after planting its growth is rather slow. After this it compares favorably with our oth- er valuable trees in this list. Seeds ripen in the fall. Pack in sand not too moist, or turn down on walk, and treat as ash seeds, which is generally best. Plant where wanted if possible, as growth is much impeded by transplanting. AsH-LEAVED Mapue (Negundo aceriodes).*—This tree is one of the easiest of all to propagate, and for great amount of fuel in a short time it has no superior. In ‘Ilinois it is being planted for sugar-making. Its wood in the older States, and in Europe, is used in cabinet- work. Gather seeds in fall; ; keep under box as with ash, and sow where wanted. Under any kind of culture where a cottonwood will grow, this tree will flourish equally well or better. HackBERRY (Celtis occidentalis)—Our native variety of hackberry grows very rapidly under culture, and has a special value for making flat hoops for apple and flour barrels. It splits very freely, and if cut in summer, and the bark peeled, the rails when nailed on posts last many years. For fuel it is about like soft maple. The fruit is about the size of peas, and is usually abundant on our river-bottoms. Wash the sweet pulp from the seeds and mix with sand for early spring sowing. CueEstNuT (Castanea vesca).—In the south half of the State, and on first-class fruit soils in the central district, this may be made a profitable tree for cultivation. Of all the trees known to the writer this is the most retarded in growth by trans- planting. Trees grown from the nuts where wanted will attain size for small posts while the transplanted ones are hardly large enough for lima-bean_ poles. Good success has been attained by planting the nuts in “Yankee corn- -hills, giving the corn good care and keeping the hills free from weeds. After gathering the corn, before cold weather, break the stalkssoas to make a partial shelter over the plants. The second year cultivate well until first of J uly, after which let weeds grow to shade the ground. The chestnut is specially injured when young, (and the same holds good with all forest-trees to greater or less extent), by excessive heating of soil under our August sun. After the third year the ground will be well shaded with the trees and they will make rapid growth, and will richly repay for the trouble and care of management while young. The chestnuts to be used for seed must not be allowed to become dry, or to mold or heat from being too closely con- fined. They should be mixed with pure sand and kept through winter where they will be damp but not too wet. Seed grown north is every time preferable. Nuts grown in Benton Co nty have product ed seedings standing our climate better than those coming from the cest or south. Rep Muvserry (Morus rubra).—This is a very handsome ornamental tree, grow- ing very rapidly during the first years after planting, and soon attaining size suit- able for grape-vine or other stakes, and even for posts. The timber is strong, com- pact, and very durable. If dried before set in the soil, it is questionable whether we have any timber, doing well in rich soils, as durable for posts or stakes as this. A drawback to its culture is the scarcity of seed, the birds generally getting the fruit as fast as ripe. Wash the pulp from seed and mix with sand for early spring sowing, either in seed-bed or where wanted. Plant the mulberry where sheltered from the west and northwest by belts of trees like elm or cottonwood that will bet- ter stand the rake of our dry, «old winds. , It also does best on porous, deep soils, as long continous drought serivusly injures and even kills the trees on soils with the blue clay too near the surface. YELLOW Bircu (Betulu excelsa)—This tree thrives exceedingly well on deep, rich, and moderately moist soils, oa porous subsoil. It makes excellent fuel, *By some botanists called Acor negundo. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. wall and is valuable for many manufacturing purposes where a strong. fine-grained, handsome wood is desirable. It is only recommended for variety. It grows readily when transplanted : and the lover of trees will always be pleased to have it in a general collection. The seedlings are not so easy to grow in our dry airas those of most forest-trees, and the seed, of which there is an abundance in the market. is usually not in a condition to grow. The plants may be bought in any quantity in the pinery regions at low rates. Larce Asreen (Ponulus grandidentata)—Unlke ‘the common aspen, this tree rapidly attains, under cultivation, considerable size. The wood has no great value for fuel; yet. it has a svecial value for farm-uses that should not be overlooked. (1) It grows when planted, closely. very straight. and the noles—cut in summer and pealed—flattened on one side, make very ‘strong and stiff rafters for sheds, and even barns. When large enough for hewing-sticks, it is fully equal to white ns for frames of barns. (2) No timber in our list will attain. under good culture, size suffic ient for two cle as soon, that is equally strong and durable, if cut in summer and veeled. In lengths of eight or nine feet nailed on good posts, they keep in place better than oak. and will last fully fifteen years. All things considered, it is best to crow this tree from cuttings ; yet. where seed ean be procured, the plants erow with as much certainty as the cottonwood or maple. > _ We may add, that a plat of the aspen on the open prairies is ever an object of interest in contrast with other trees. The leaves tremble in the ueites breeze when the foliage of other trees is motionless. Watre Poriar (Populus alba.)—This tree is usually voted a nuisance as a Shade on account of its wonderful tendency for suckering ; but this tendency to sucker, would be no objection in forest-culture. The size which this tree will reach in ‘prairie in ten vears, is a matter of wonder and surprise. It is probable that we have no tree with valuable wood that will reach saw-log size as soon as this. Like the elm, the intrinsic value of this tree has been overlooked. Let us enumerate : (1) It propagates from cuttings of any size, even more readily than-the willow. (2) It is valuable for about the same uses as the famous tulip tree, (Liriodondroa tuliplfera) of Ohio. It makes very superior flooring, wainscoting, and even finish- ing lumber for houses. The boards used for siding, or for fencing, are vastly superior to any of the poplar family. except it be the yellow cottonwood. For dry-goods boxes. bowls, trays, carriage-bottoms, trunk- making, chair-seats, &c., the wood i is counted in Europe, superior to pine or white-wood. (3) When thickly planted, it runs up very straight; and. the poles cut in thin- ning, can be utilized by nailing on posts for fence, for rafters, sleepers, etc., as with the aspen. As with the latter, the trees for this use should be cut in summer and peeled, when they are quite durable if kept from the ground. Witp Rep Cierry (Cerasus Pennsylvanicu.)—This is a small-growing tree in its native haunts ; but, it behaves so well under cultivation, that. it deserves a place in our timber plantations. It is peculiarly a northern tree, being found on nearly all soils from the Atlantic coast to the headwaters of the Mackenzie River, in British America. It is very nearly allied to the common cultivated cherry, and exibits in its seedlings a marked capacity for variation and improvement. A variety is in common cultivation in the south part of Benton county, lowa, which bears heavy annual crops of fruit, which is considered excellent for culinary use. ' The fruit is fully as large as that of the black wild-cherry, and of pleasant flavor. The wood of this tree is exceedingly hard, fine-grained, and of a reddish hue, and would be valuable for many uses in cabinet work, were it not for the natural small size of the tree. Grown thickly in artificial groves, its poles are Straight and tall, and valuable for such farm-uses as nailing on posts, fence-stakes, vine- stakes, light fence-posts, &c. If dried before putting in the ground, it lasts as well for posts as black cherry. The pits kept in sand through winter grow as readily as those of black cherry. It transplants readily, and sprouts can be secured in nearly all parts of the State for setting in groves. It will not ie? to grow this timber, except for home-use on the farm. WHITE Witow. (Salix alba).—Perhaps, it may not be proper to include the willow among the timber-trees proper, having a special value for farm-uses, or for manufacturing. Yet, where grown thickly, the poles are straight, and uniform in size, and if cut in summer and bark peeled off, they last for several years nailed on posts for fence, and the fuel, if dried under cover, has a greater value for sum- mer use than is generally supposed. It is specially mentioned i in this connection, 28 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. on account of its combined adaptation for wind-breaks and fences on the bleak interior prairies. If any one doubts the expediency of growing the white willow on an extended scale, let him pay a visit to Story county, lowa. Several years since, Col. John Scott, of that county, earnestly advocated the extended planting of this tree for fences, for fuel, and for the arresting of wind-sweeps on their bleak, broad prairies. In the portion of the county where its planting has been general, one can now hardly realize he is upon prairie in driving along the streets, lined on both sides for miles in extent, with combined fence and wind-screen. Where best known, the wonder is expressed by prairie-settlers, how they got along before its advent in their neighbood. Thomas Wardall, of Mitchell county, who has had a long prairie experience, writes of the white willow, as follows, in a report on hedges for the north: Seventh—We tried the white willow. This has come to us at the north asa “ God-send.” Not because it makes the best hedges, for no one is so foolish as to assume that, but because a stock-proof fence can be made of it, in brief time, and at small expense, which at once is a fence and a wind-break. A combination of this kind the denizens of our northern prairies can appreciate. The variety mostly in use in our section, and in Minnesota, will not bear plashing, or even weaving, and will not lose the tree-habit of growth, by being headed back. So we have by mutual consent, abandoned all attempts at hedge-making proper, and we aim to secure a close bottom at once, then give protection from sto¢k for two ears, and we havea profitable investment in what will become a solid wall of ive timber in a very few years; at once a fence,a valuable screen from the sweeping winds of summer and winter, and which will give a constant supply of assable fire-wood from the tops. And now for the plan for forming such a stock- pairicn to which I will ask special attention. Let every northern farmer plant out a willow grove, with good, large cuttings in early spring. Plant four feet apart, both ways, and cultivate well for two or three years, and a large growth will be secured. When five years old, trim out all but one plant to each hill. Cut off stakes five and one-half feet long from these trimmings. Sharpen these stakes and drive them eighteen inches deep in a well-prepared fence-row. When the soil is soft in the spring, the driving can be done without bruising the bark. Let the stakes be driven closely, not more than six inches apart. Nail a stay-lath near the top. A three-inch barn-batten answers the purpose well. Mulch heavily or cultivate well and often. In two years, a fence may be made that may be depended on to turn stock, but which will have the one fault of not being beau- tiful : The Iowa Horticultural Society fixed upon the 20th day of April, 1874, and afterward, annually, unless changed, as a day to be devoted to the planting of trees and seeds of trees, designed to form permanent groves, or for ornament. This day proving cold and stormy the first year, planters competing for premiums, were allowed the next year to select the time most convenient. In earlier numbers of the Forestry Annual, the following suggestions, are also offered : Prairie farms need shelter most on the west, next on the north, next on the south, while their usefulness on the east, is not so great, though sufficient to call for planting. * * * A good combination for an evergreen belt, is two or three rows of white pine for center, two rows of Scotch or Austrian pine on each-side, and two rows of red cedar, or arbor vite outside of these, making ten or eleven rows, and giving, by different rates of growth, a belt with a conical cross-section, and limbs from the ground up. Another good combination is made of Norway spruce for center, white spruce next, and black spruce and red cedar, or arbor vitee outside. | The Scotch pine is, in many localities, found well adapted for outside rows, from its hardy habit. It needs more room for growth than the » white pine. In planting wind-breaks, it was recommended that the out- side rows should be 9 feet apart, and plants 5 feet apart in the rows. It was remarked, that people, yenerally, are apt to overestimate the time it will take to secure returns of fuel from artificial groves. Cottonwood needs to be thinned the fourth or fifth year. If properly grown aud cul- tivated, the poles then cut out, will average 24 inches in diameter at the FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 29 bottom, and 12 feet long. From a full stand, one-half, or 1775 poles, would be cut at this period from an acre. Green ash seeds thinning at six or seven years, and makes poles as large as those of the cottonwood, at four or five. Those who had tried it, say that it pays better to raise wood for fuel, than to haul the supply needed five miles for ten years. As for wood grown for other uses than as fuel, it was estimated that a crop of ash for hoop-poles, or larch for stakes, might be grown in from seven to eleven years; and of oak and hickory, in twelve to sixteen years. Larch would grow to a size for posts in twelve to fifteen years ; and for telegraph-poles, in eighteen to twenty years, on valley lands. Walnut, hickory, elm, and other tie timber, might be fit for use in from fourteen to eighteen years. Cottonwood might be sawn at fifteen years, and white pine in thirty. ; As some of the foregoing varieties of timber are more cheaply propa- gated from cuttings than in any other way ; Lagain plunder the Transac- tions of the State Horticultural Society for a paper on the subject, eee by me for its annual winter session at Owatonna, January, Sic ahaa : THE PROPAGATION OF TREES BY CUTTINGS. A paper on “The Propagation of trees by Cuttings,” by L. B. Hodges, Esq., of St. Paul, was-read, after which the paper was ordered on file for publication, and Mr. Jewell moved a vote of thanks to Mr. Hodges for his humorous and instructive essay, and also a rebuke for his reflection on the religious intelligence of the members of the Society. The resolu- tion was passed amid laughter and applause. The following is the paper in full: When a small boy, more than forty years ago, in the pleasant village of Canandaigua, N. Y., my attention was arrested by a magnificent great willow on the premises of Judge A , one of the pioneers of that region. It was a tradition among the boys that this immense tree grew from a willow switch which the Judge cut in Connecticut and used as a riding whip during his horseback journey from Connecticut to Western New York, and for over thirty years of my manhood passed on the broad prairies of the Northwest, I have often seen and heard of similar willows with very similar histories. Now, this is all well enough per se, but when . intelligent and educated gentlemen, on the strength of such occasional and isolated circumstances, affirm that all you have got to do in order to grow the willow, the cottonwood or the Lumbardy is to simply stick a cutting in the ground in-most any sort of a hap-hazzard way, they are - simply leading the multitude astray and doing harm rather than good. The object of this paper is to furnish to the people interested in the propagation of forest trees by this particular method such practical in- formation as a long and varied experience has proved to be correct. If this sort of experience is in conflict with tradition and preconceived notions, why so much the worse for the traditions and notions. I begin by saying that the proper preparation of the soil is not only of primary importance, but also a prerequisite condition of success. Soil and its Preparation. Your ground must be good ground, it must be thoroughly subdued and mellow before planting, and right here I propose to point out and expose the practical nonsense and absurdity of the proposition that a cutting will grow anyhow, so you only stick it intheground. Acting on 30 ’ FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. this absurd proposition, hundreds of thousands of all sorts of cuttings have been stuck in all sorts ot ground by all sorts of prople. The results are well illustrated in the parable of the sower. _ (Before going to bed to-night, you tellows who hayn’t read that para- ble. for twenty years or more nau better look it over.) Soon atter the passage of the limber Culture Act of 1873, I read in one of the most ably-conducted and. widely-circulated of our country papers, an editorial showing the settler how to grow a forest under the provisions of said act. soiled down, it simply amounted to this: Strips ot breaking two or turee turrows wide, said strips twelve feet apart and the cuttings to be stuck twelve teet apart in the strips, in the raw, unsubdued sod; no turtuer labor or expense necessary—result, a torest. 1 promptly denounced the absurdity of such teachings, but for all that, a heap of tellows had to try it on. It would be a good time now for them to report what luck they nave had. ; In the pursuit of knowledge under difficulties, my curivsity has led me over quite a large number of tree claims which have been planted in good faith in accordance with such teachings. Candor compels me to say that when you find a muley cow climbing a tree stern-tirst, it will be up one of the trees so propagated on one of those tree claims. The Northern Pacific Railroad Co., expended a number of thousands of dollars in just about that sort or a way of propagating forest trees from cuttings, and succeeded in demonstrating that it was just as easy to drive a government mule throuyn the eye ot a needle, as to grow forest trees in any such way as that. The idea of getting something for nothing, is a bad one. There must _ be an equivalent, a quid pro quo. in your dealings with each other, this idea of something for nothing, may work, occasionally,—but you can’t bulldoze the prairie with any such nonsense. The cutting plunged full length into a deep, rich, mellow soil, under the vivitying intluences of heat and moisture, soon begins to expand its . buds, and throw out its slender, threadlike, fibrous roots. If the ground has been properly prepared, those roots at once begin to draw nourish-. ment tor the incipient tree; the buds grow into branches, and in a few months you haye a thoroughly developed forest tree, and the better cul- tivation you give this yonng tree, the sooner you get a tree that is of some use in the world. . On the other hand, the cutting stuck in the raw sod, makes a failure in trying to get its roots into the hard earth 1n a vain attempt for nour- ishment; struggles along in a feeble, quiet sort of a way till ary weather sets in, and then quietly starves to death without a struggle or a groan, and the innocent author of this miserable abortion wonders what ails his trees, and sometimes gets mad, and uses “cuss-words,” about the man who sold him the cuttings. To go back to the starting point: break your prairie in June; break shallow—back-set or cross-plow last of September, turning up two or three inches of tresh dirt. If in a hurry, (to save your claim) harrow thoroughly, and plant your cuttings right along up to the time the ground shuts up, and if not through, finish up the job early in the ensuing spring. It in a hurry it is a good practice to raise a crop betore planting cuttings. A hoed crop is best, and if well cultivated leaves the ground in admirable condition FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. ol for tree-planting. If you sow small grain before planting, you can’t be too careful in getting your seed perfectly clean. at} A few grains of wild buckwheat, or, what is more to be dreaded, pigeon grass, will give you an infinite amount o. trouble, and by: in- creased labor in keeping it down, double the costs of growing the forest. ~ Ae In growing a wind-break from cuttings, for a single row, I would pre- pare a strip of ground not less than 83 feet wide, by deep plowing and — thorough harrowing. I would have the ground as mellow as an ash-heap. I would draw a line lengthwise along the centre of this strip, and about every twelve to eighteen inches would plunge the cutting in nearly ~ or quite full length, and at once tramp the mellow earth firmly around. the cutting; and then I would keep that strip of ground clean as a hound’s tooth. I wouldn’t allow a weed or blade of grass to grow on that’ strip dedicated to the wind-brake ; and I should keep the cultivator running up and down the margin each side the row of young trees pretty often till harvest time, after which, if any weeds or grass had put in an appearance, would pull them up, carry them off and burn them up. 1 should repeat this process the next season, and in the fall would mulch heavy with good manure. _ I think by that time you will have that strip of prairie pretty well bulldozed, and a wind-break started that won’t dry out or freeze out, and which will stand and grow in spite of grasshoppers or other enemies. Time of Preparing Cuttings. As far as the willow is concerned, most any time will do. I have cut them nearly every month in the year, yet would prefer cut- ting and planting right along through the month of May, as being then liable to less loss and better growth. _ I confess in my own experience to more. satisfactory results with cot- tonwood cuttings cut and planted in October and November than in any other months. As far as willow, cottonwood and Lombardy cuttings are concerned, good, fresh healthy ones are about as sure to grow (in Minnesota) if properly handled, and under the most favorable circumstances, as either corn or potatoes. Fwilwre is not necessary. Do your work*intelligently and thoroughly, and at the proper time, and success is the rule. Care of Cuttings till Planted. In the fall of 1874 I caused to be cut and hauled together, enough white willow to make five hundred thousand cuttings. I reduced some of this brush to cuttings in the fall, tied them up in bunches of a hundred each, set them up on end in trenches dug about a foot deep, threw a foot of dirt over them and let them lay till spring. The balance was stacked in good shape, covered with a layer of slough hay—threw enough loose dirt over it to keep the wind out, and let the thing go till it thawed out in the spring—then uncovered it, worked it up into cuttings and planted them. They came good and grew well, and I never knew any - difference between those buried in trenches, or those of the stack. When- ever in the course of human events, I found a lot of cuttings drying up and aparently worthless, before planting I would “swell ’em up” by throwing them into the most convenient lake, pond or stream. But eal way is to keep them. buried in the trench until you are ready to plant. 32 ; FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. There are plenty of cottonwood trees in Minnesota propagated from cuttings in the manner I recommend, now big enough to make a cord of wood each—17 to 20 years from the cutting. You can grow 300 such trees to the acre. Can you grow anything that will pay better? Is there any better way to “conquer the prairie,” or to bulldoze and intimidate old Boreas ?. From Dr. Hough’s Report, page 554, I clip the following as worthy of a place here, and also because it touches some points that were over-. looked in the preparation of the toregoing paper: Mr. J. L. Budd, now of the Iowa State Agricultural College, furnished for the State Horticultural Report of 1868, p. 111, an article upon this subject, from which we condense the following : The red maple (Acer rubrum), silver maple (A. dasycarpum), ash-leaved maple (Neyundo eceroides), cottonwoods ) Populus monilifera and ungulata), balm of Gilead (P. balsamiferu), Lombardy poplar (P. dilatata), white poplar (P. alba), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and white willow (Salia alba), will grow from cuttings, and all thrive on the Western ‘prairies. - They should be cut early in winter, before severe freezing, in lengths of about one foot. They should be chosen from three- fourths of an inch to an inch and a half in diameter,‘and the lower end with a clean cut, without bruising or mashing. Of maples the ‘two- year-old wood is best ; of the other kinds it makes but little difference, if the growth is free and healthy. Tie in bundles with willows, the lower end nicely evened so that when placed on the ground in spring every piece will touch the moist earth. Pack the bundles in a dry-goods box with moist prairie soil, putting the box where it will not get to dry or wet, and-will not.freeze. With the first warm weather of spring clean off. a spot under an old’ hay-stack, level the surface carefully, and set the bundles, butt-end. down, closely together, upon the fresh moist earth ; then cover them with straw so as to” keep them from the air. By the time the eround g gets warm enough to plant, the base of the cuttings will be softened, and most of them will ae small roots. WHITE WILLOW, (Salix alba.) My own opinion of this valuable vegetable, is too well known in Minn- esota to justify me in repeating the arguments I have used in its be- half, lo, these many years. A few extracts and opinions from other and more authoritative sources, and I then cheerfully submit the character of this old friend to the jury. Again quoting from Dr. Hough’s Report, page 108 : 1. ‘Salix albt, the white or Huntingdon willow, a fine tree which in proper soil will, in. twenty years, make an average of two cubic feet a year. The wood is light, tough, easily worked, and proper for tool- handles, hoops,, cooper work, &c., and its bark is used for tanning, and in medicine as a tonic and astringent, being recognized in ‘our pharmacopceeias, and sometimes used as asubstitute for Peruvian park. . Its active principle, salicin, is also used as a remedy i in intermittent fevers. This willow has been already widely introduced, and in the prairie region of the Northwest it is valued above all other trees as a wind-break. It makes a very good fuel, and its wood is useful for a great variety of purposes. Professor: Sargent mentions a willow between Stockbridge and Great Barrington, Mass., planted, it is said, as a cutting in 1807, that now, at “4 feet from the ground, is 21 feet 8 inches in circumference. An English writer in speaking of the willows, says that the white willow, when unpr uned and grown naturally in favorable conditions, is the handsomest of the willow family, whether we regard its general outline, habit, or the peculiar white- ness of its foliage, which forms a pleasing contrast with the darker green of other trees. It comes forward rapidly on deep river banks and rich alluvial bottoms, too damp-for most other timber-trees. In Great Britain within afew years willow timber has come universally into use as blocks for brakes in railroad cars, so that wood of good size has become scarce and high-priced. The charcoal of all wil- lows of suitable size is used in making gunpowder. Among other uses to which FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 30 ceriain kinds of willow are used in Europe, and for which it is especially adapted, are paddle-wheel floats, and for shrouding water-wheels, cart-linings (being not liable to splinter,) turner’s uses, shoe-lasts, withes for tying, &c. Something has _ been said of its incombustible properties, but more than facts will justify. Wi.ttow Hepees.—In Northern Iowa, where the Osage orange is too tender for the climate, the white willow has been found to answer an excellent purpose as well for a hedge to stop cattle as for a wind-break. Mr. Thomas Wardall, of Mitch- ell County, gives the following advice in the cultivation of this tree: Let every Northern farmer plant out a willow grove with good large cuttings in early spring. Plant four feet apart both ways, and cultivate well for two or three years, and a large growth will be secured. When five years old, trim out all but one plant to each hill, cut off stakes five and one-half feet long from these trim- mings, sharpen these stakes and drive them eighteen inches deep in a well pre- pared fence-row. Let the stakes be driven closely—not more than six inches apart; nailastay-lath near the top—a three-inch barn-batten answers the pur- pose well. Mulch heavily, or cultivate well and often. In two years a fense may be made that may be depended on to turn stock, but which will have the one fault of not being beautiful. The willow as cultivated by Mr. W. would not bear plashing or even weaving, but the tops afforded a constant supply of inditterent fuel. I have seen cuttings planted on the same day, and with the same soil and treat- ment in all respects, except that part were mulched and part were not, and .were the former succeeded well, the latter utterly failed. I have seen the cuttings when not mulched, make a nice start, but perish in the heat and drought of summer. I have seen large cuttings, driven into an unbroken prairie-sod, make a fine growth when a sufficient mulch was applied to subdue the native grass. But in this man- ner of planting, the mulch should be heavy, and should extend at least five or six feet on each side of the rows to give the plants a chance. It would be better, within a year or two thereafter, also to break a greater width outside of the mulch, as the sod would interfere with the growth of tne trees, as soon as the roots should reach that distance. Straw, hay, stalks, manure, sawdust, anything that will me- chanically serye the purpose ot mulch, will answer, but manure would stimulate the growth very satisfoctorily. * * * Cutting back may be resorted to in cases where there has been a poor stand, but not where the plants stand within twelve or fifteen teet of eachother. The trees should not be plashed down or woven together, but should be stimulated to make a strong, upright growth. Late planting is even worse than close planting. This is especially true if the buds have started before the cuttings were made, or if they have been allowed to dry before setting. While young and tender, the. shoots must be guarded from live stock. Calves will eat the tender shoots, and keep them shorn so close as to kill out the strongest plantings while young. Shal- low planting, thin soil, standing water on the surface, grass and weeds to smooth- er the plants, are all to be avoided or remedied. In short, avoid everything that interferes with a good stand and a vigorous growth, and you will never have cause to call the white willow a humbug. * * * - The amount of fuel that may be cut from a rod of fence, taking all above the height of three feet, is much greater than most persons would think, and its re- production on the same spot, without further labor, makes it a crop of no mean value on the open prairie. * * * Mr. O. B. Galusha, in a lecture at the Illinois Industrial University in 1869, in speaking of the white willow, says: I regard this as probably combining more desirable qulities for cultivation in groves for lumber purposes than any other variety of the soft-wood, rapid-growing deciduous trees, and am decidely of the opinion that this and the golden variety are the best deciduous trees within my knowledge for wind-breaks or screens, but wish to be distinctly understood as not recommending this tree as a hedge-plant, or the planting of this or any other one sort to the neglect of other desirable vari- ties. Strong cuttings of this tree seldom fail to strike root at once in mellow soil, and will make a growth of from two to six feet the first season. It thrives in all kinds of soil, making as much wood in a given number of years as any other known sort, not even excepting the cottonwood, growing into a large tree, some- times four feet in diameter. The wood is of rather fine texture for a light wood, making a fair article of soft lumber which bears a fine polish. It is also valuable for making wooden ware, bowls, trays, &c. It also splits freely, which is a desir- able quality in making fence-posts, rails, railroad-ties, and fire-wood. * * * 84 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. The golden willow is similar in growth and texture to the white, but I think does _ not. make so large a tree. I have measured about a dozen trees of this variety (golden), which. were planted by the roadside 15 years ago last spring, and find the . average circumference of the trunks at three and a half feet from the ground to be ~ 5 feet three inches. .A white willow * * * which has grownfrom.asmall cut- - ting put in 13 years ago last spring, now measures 6 feet 2.inches near the ground, | forming a head or top 30 feet across. This variety, when planted in groves, grows — tall and almost perfectly straight. I have carefully computed the expense of rais- — ing ten acres of trees of this variety and converting them into lumber, and find the entire cost not to exceed $10 per thousand feet. This estimate is based upon actual measurement of the growth of trees. The land itself is valued at $40 per | acre, with interest upon this amount, together with expenses computed as before, at 6 per cent. compound interest. I take ten acres in these estimates of growing : artificial groves because it is desirable to have trees enough together, or in close proximity, that the cost of putting up and removing a saw-mill would be but a - trifle upon each thousand feet of lumber sawed. The value of the willow in preventing erosion in the banks of riversand streams, | for holding the soil liable to washing away in valleys, and for filling up the chan- nels worn by small streams in loose gravelly soil, and preventing further gullying, must have been noticed by every observing person. This office is performed by ° the. multitude of long tracing roots that it sends through the damp soil wherever they. find nourishment, the shoots by which it multiplies and spreads from. the — roots, and sometimes when crowded, by the pro strate branches. ©. i Such willows when abundant and of large gowth, also serve a useful purpose by ” preventing injuries from floating ice in rivers, and they are turned to profitable | use by engineers for holding in place the new deposits of mud formed under the a shelter of jetties and other Seale improvements. . a Samuel Edwards of Burean. Co. Illinois, writes to: the Germantown Telegraph, of the white willow as a timber tree as follows : “Tt bas. been grown here since 1845, and the more we became pormertie with _ it the better we like it. No other tree has made as rapid growth; a cutting set. in 1845 is over four feet in diameter. Many are planting it all over the prairie region for timber; much is being set for hedge screens, which are cut down every few years at four. feet from the ground, affording a great amount of fuel and Beles for fencing...” Formerly small sized, cuttings were set, but for some years, stakes five ane ae half feet in length from one to three inches in diameter, have been preferred, set- ting them 18 inches. déep, and a foot apart,” General James‘S. Brisbin, U.S. A. , writing from Omaha, to the Chieago : Tribune, April 27th, 1874, says: : “The beautiful green, guncetal white willow. Who does not love it; and hae : ranchman does not hail it as his friend, and delight to sit in its cool shade? It grows almost spontaneously. Shelters from heat or cold; keeps off wind, rain, or sleet, and is a green spot on which to rest the eye, when all around is desolate, barren, anda desert. ie rows from a shoot without roots, and foresters - always praise its rapid and grateful return for the slight labor they bestow upon it. A tree of this kind attains a height of 60 or 70 feet, and shows an immense trink. For shade trees along the highways, it is unsurpassed ; repelling heat, wind and cold, and no drive can be finer than through an avenue of willows.” J. Plank, Eyota, Minn., March, 1874, writing to the Farmer’s ‘Union, . says: “T think white willow makes the best and cheapest fence. In ‘six years (from planting), you can have a live fence, which will have cost you 25 cents a rod, and last a-lifetime. I have about a hundred rods of it that will turn any kind of stock. I am going to put in some more this spring.” Jesse W. Fell replying to an article in the Prairie Farmer ae is to the white willow, says: “Tf the writer of that article will call at our house at Normal, it will afford me much pleasure to show him a section of a moss-covered fence- rail, that has lain in a fence more than forty years, and is yet perfectly sound; and if he will go with me to my native county, (Chester, Pa.) I will show him miles of fence made of the same material and that has lasted the same length of time. That it makes FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 35 good fuel—I will not say the best—is not doubted. I therefore enter my earnest protest against the remark that “this timber is of little value.” The timber itself is of great value, especially in a country like this; and when, in addition, you take into account how easily andsurely it is propagated, simply by cuttings; how rapid- ly it grows; how sound and healthy a tree it is; how vigorously it reproduces itself - from the stump where cut down, and yet does not spread from the roots; I say, when all these things are taken into the account, it is questionable, whether, for the millions, it is not after all, the tree for this country and climate. I did not in- tend to say so much, but could not well say less, when one of my old friends had been so unjustly assailed. Whilst I am writing, fierce winds are whistling around me, the force of which is unbroken for many miles by tree or shrub except by those embryo forests, in which this very plant cuts the most prominent figure. . and I must raise my voice in its behalf.” Col: John Scott, of Story county, in Central Iowa, reported in 18762 that many miles of willow hedge were planted in that county, and that more than one hundred miles would be tound a complete barrier against stock. Many miles had been set in a random, aimless way, and were worthless as a fence, although somewhat profitable, as fuel and shelter. He gives his method for successful planting, as follows: 1. The row should be made mellow and deep, and the better the condition as to © richness, freedom from weeds, and good tilth the better. If in good condition for corn, it will do for the willow. ; 2. The cuttings should be made before the buds swell in the spring; they should be packed in moist earth to keep them drying out; they should be from the . upright, rather than the lateral growth, as being more thrifty ; and may be from - six inches to six foot in length, and from one-half to four inches in diameter. 3. It is best that they be assorted before planting, so that those of about the same size may be planted together. 4, They should be set in a straight line, and only one row planted, and should be ten or twelve inches apart. ‘The cuttings are often set too closely. They should have room to spread themselves in. ASH AND LARCH. ‘Failures have often been encountered in transplanting the larch, by overlooking the important principle, that the top should bear a corre- sponding relation in its leaves to the root in its radicles.. Many of the latter are necessarily torn off with the most careful transplanting, and it is.a safe rule to shorten the branches in a corresponding degree. The larch should be planted early in the season. THE ASH AND THE LARCH. In an article, by Mr. Arthur Bryant,* on the ash and the larch, he mentions the white ash, as one of the most important timbers in the northern States, and concerning the difficulty of raising from seed, he . Says: ; ie If the seed be sown soon after gathering from the tree, without drying, it will come up well in the spring; but if dried, a great part will often fail to vegetate the first year,even if kept through the winter in damp sand. Care must be taken not to cover too deeply. Probably, forest trees, as well as others, often fail from this cause. When self-sown, they have no other covering than leaves, or a little earth, when concealed by mice or squirrels. If sown in autumn, ash-seed should be covered with litter during winter, to prevent washing out by rains. It'seems very probable, that the seed of the green ash, is as often gathered and sown, as that of the white. The green ash is common along streams in the west. It produces seed more frequently than the white ash, and upon small trees, and is, therefore; more easily collected. The seed vegetates with more certainty, than - that of the white ash, even if sown dry; and the young trees grow more rapidly for the first year or two. When in leaf, it may easily be distinguished from the white ash. The timber is similar in quality, but it has the disadvantage of never 2 “* Traite genernl des Coniferes,”’ p. 280. 36 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. becoming a large tree. The white ash is somewhat variable in its characteristics, and some of these variations have formerly been named and described by botan- — ists as permanent varieties, or even species. It belongs to northern latitudes, and - only obtains its fullest development in colder climates than that of northern Illinois. The blue ash abounds in more southern latitudes than the white ; it is, in every respect, as valuable, and has the advantage of being more durable. The combination of strength, lightness, and elasticity in ash timber, renders it supe- rior to any other native wood for many purposes, and the demand for it, must always be extensive.. Much has been said and written in praise of the European larch ; but, never- theless, little, if any notice has been taken of its peculiar fitness for railroad ties. _ [The writer highly commends this timber for this use, citing English authorities. It grows rapidly, closely, and in fifteen years, becomes 50 feet high, and 8 to 12 inches in diameter. It should never be planted on wet land.] The American larch has been eulogized as fully equal to the European in durability. Michaux describes it as having the same properties. In the British Provinces, north of the Saint Lawrence, and in Newfoundland, where it is highly esteemed, it grows upon upland, forming large masses of forest. In the United States, it is found only in swamps—never on upland; a fact, which Michaux, regards as evidence, that the climate of the northern limits of the United States is too mild for its constitution. From all the testimony, the writer has been able to collect from those who have used it, it appears, that when in swamps, in the United States, it - is, by no means, remarkably durable; whether this is owing to soil or climate, is a matter of uncertainty. The European larch, is found, principally, in the central and southern parts of Europe, and is, therefore, better suited to the climate of northern Illinois, than the American species, which reaches perfection only in a much colder climate, and is, likewise, of slower growth. LARCH PLANTATIONS OF THE DUKE OF. ATHOL. The plantations of larch, by the Duke of Athol, have been often men- tioned, and were begun in 1728. Between 1740 and 1750, James, then bearing this title, planted over 1,200 larch trees, as an experiment; the tree being then new, in Scotland. In 1759, he planted 700 more, mixed with other kinds, on a hill-side very poor and stony, and with good results. His successor, John, first conceived the idea of planting the larch, to the exclusion of other kinds, and covered four hundred acres of sterile hill-sides, with this timber. He died in 1774, and his son, Duke John, continuing the practice, had, in 1783, planted 279,000 trees. Between 1786 and 1791, he planted six hundred and eighty acres, with 500,000 larches. He continued the practice till 1826; when he and his predecessors, had planted more than 14,000,000, covering more than ten thousand acres. It was estimated, that the larch, in seventy-two years, gained its fullest value; and before reaching this age, the trees should be thinned to 400 on an acre. Estimating the trees at fifty cubic feet, worth a shilling a foot, the product would be £1,000 per acre on the poorest land for agricultural purposes that could be found in the country. The condition of the forests on this estate, was described, in 18731, as — follows: . The woodlands extend to over ten thousand acres, divided into five districts, each under a separate forester. The woods were still, mainly larch ; but, it had, in many cases, been planted in soil better suited for the Scotch fir. But one man- of-war frigate, the Athol, had ever been built from the larch, it having fallen into disrepute for ship-building, on account of the disease, which had appeared within _ the last thirty or forty years, and the recent substitution of iron for wood, which had reduced the calculation of £1,000 per acre, to £150 or £200. The disease ap- peared universal, and no remedy had been found, short of cutting off and replant- ing. It appeared to be atmospheric, and appeared as a fungus-like growth on the stem of the tree, generally, near the axils of the branches, then developing itself as a blister, and, finally, a hole or wound, asif a branch had been rudely broken 1 “Reports on Forest Management,’? By Capt. Campbell Walker, p. 115, ley FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 37 off. There was still, a fine larch wood of three thousand acres, covering hills that rise sixteen hundred feet above the sea. The forester in charge approved the practice of removing the lower dead limbs of the larch, which could best be done in very dry, clear weather, whether warm or frosty, as the branches were . then brittle. Plantations of Scotch fir and other conifers, were being introduced, and the sycamore-maple was found to flourish extremely well. Larch trees planted by the Duke of Athol, in 1748, were, in 1795, nine feet three inches around, at four feet from the ground, and one hundred feet high. In 1869, these | ead wuasured more than sixteen feet around, and were one hundred and twenty eet high. RATE OF GROWTH AND DURABILITY OF THE EUROPEAN LARCH. The experience of European observers, is very generally united in assigning great durability to this timber, and these opinions have been often quoted in essays intended to encourage its growth in this country. Carriere, after ,describing eight species of the Larix, remarks, that this tree was known to the ancients, and that it is cited, by Pliny, as most valuable, on account of the fineness and elacticity of its wood. He highly commends it, as well for ornamental planting, as for its rapidity of growth, the large size that it attains, and the superior quality of its timber.? Laslet says :? “ The wood is of a yellowish-white color, tough, strong, and occssionally, a little coarse; but, it is generally straight and even in the grain. It works up tolerably well, and is considered to be very durable, but has the serious drawback of excessive shrinkage, with . a tendency to warp in seasoning.” Grigor says,* that when favorably sit- _ uated, no tree becomes so valuable in so short a time, and that it is par- ticularly durable, as posts and palings, and in all structures that come in contact with the ground. It is constantly employed for railway sleepers, for mill axles, and in ship-building. These opinions might, in fact, be extended almost indefinitely, and with but little to be said against it. It also possesses qualities which we scarcely have seen no- . ticed in connection with its culture in this country, as the source of tanning material in its bark, and of Venice turpentine, in its resinous sap. 5 section was exhibited by D. C. Scofield, of Elgin, Ill.,in 1874, which had been imported as a small plant in 1858, and had grown to nearly a foot in diameter in thirteen years. He also exhibited a branch a fourth of an inch in diameter which had been seven years among decaying rubbish on the ground and was still hard and sound. This test was claimed to demonstrate the remarkable durability of the European larch in the'climate of Illinois, while the native species (Larix Americana) would not probably have lasted even half that time. Its rapidity of growth, beauty of foliage, and general value as a screen and ornamental tree have been sufficiently proved in this timber as grown with us. But has its durability as a post, or when in contact with the ground, been proved? .We apprehend that this durability depends up- on the conversion of sap-wood into heart-wood; a change that has not very often been observed in the larch grown in this country or at least in the West. The Conifers, as a class, are found stronger and of better quality in proportion as their growth has been slow. In reference to the law which governs in the formation of wood, it is remarked by Bagneris* that in the broad-leaved species, the vessels of 2Traite general des Coniferec, p. 280. 3Timber, and Timber Trees, p. 250. ’ AArboriculture, p. 232. : *“MANUAL OF SYLVICULTURE,”? Translation"by Fernandez and Smythies, p. 31 and 59. 38 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. the annual layers of growth are either distributed equally, as in the beech, hornbeam, poplars, willlows, &c., or are congregated nearly to- gether at the interior of the ring, and are wanting or very small and scat- tered toward the exterior. This inner or porous layer is of spring growth, and about the same-in width from year to year. The outer por- tion of the year’s growth, formed later in the season, and generally called the autumnal layer, is composed of heavy, compact, woody tissue, and this varies in thickness from year to year, being sometimes thick and at others thin. These woods are therefore heavier. denser, and for most uses better in proportion to the rapidity of their growth. To this elass belongs the oak, ash and other kinds which show their rings conspicuously in section. Their heartwood is generally different in color from the sap- wood, being stronger and more durable; while in the kinds that have their vessels scattered through the whole growth of the year there is not much difference in color, density, or durability between the heart-wood and the sap-wood. en But the conifers have no ducts as in most other exogenous woods— their ligneous structure being made up of a peculiar kind of tissue, dif- fering from common wood fiber, which may be known under the micro- scope by the numerous thin circular spots in the walls of the woed cells. These are found in no other woods except the gymnosperms. The outer margin of the annual layer, is in this class made up of harder and denser tissues than the inner, and this harder part is generally of about uniform width from year to year. The difference in growth is expended upom the inner.and softer portion, and varies in thickness according as-the amount of growth has been greater or less. This harder portion on the outer margin of each year's growth gives the wood more strength and. durability, at least until the more porous part has been filled by resin- ous deposits, as in heart-wood. For this reason, conifers of slow growth, in which these hard tissues are more abundant, have their wood stronger and better for most uses than the fast-growing kinds. | ~ a: In visiting the plantation of Mr. C. D. Scofield, at Elgin, Ill., during the last summer, he remarked that his larch, set as posts, scarcely lasted three years. It by no means follows that durability would not be gained with age, and the formation of hheart-wood, or that this qual- ity might not be imparted by injecting the timber with mineral salts.’ It is further probable, that the quality of wood may be found to vary with the soil, and that the larch, grown on the high gravelly land, would differ from that of the rich prairie mold. It is within the knowledge of all lumbermen that sap-pine has no durability in the ground. It is rea- sonable that sap-larch should exhibit the same properties. We know that the pine in our soil and climate acquires with age the most desirable: qualities, and it is equally probable that the same may be true of the: European larch. It is probable that the durability of this timber would be increased by stripping off the bark and allowing it to season for a time before cutting. sae CALCULATIONS OF COST FOR ONE) ACRE OF LARCH; BY M. L. DUNLAP, OF CHAM- PAIGN, ILL. Erench plowing.) () 42). ' $ 5 | Cultivating: .0.:.. .)« \«)e\eciaame 4 Harrowing and Olin eae Le ies 2 | Hoeing the youngtrees. - --+.+. 9 Three thousand plants. . . . . ' 30-] Cultivation five years ..-.-.- - 15 Hreiphiei pipe, ok ee cea ae ke ae | u tis Sehr Spade and setting. ......,. t 3 Totals ‘cuts ns: lene, Pepe . $65 The cost of land, interest {'or six years, faxes, andthe above in five FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 39 years, amount to $125, making the total costs at that time $190. No further attention would be needed for the next six years, when, with in- ' terest and taxes, the cost would have amounted to $320. The crop at this time should consist of 2,500 trees, allowing 500 for loss. Of these, 100 may be taken out, leaving 1,500 standing. Those ‘taken out would give 1,500 posts, worth $350, less $30 for cutting, and leaving $320. Thus, in twelve years, the partial crop will have paid for ‘the land with interest, and we have 1,500 larch trees, large enough in .. twelve years more for railroad-ties, and worth, at 50 cents apiece, giving ~ $800 for the land and trees, at the end of twenty-five years.* SUGGESTIONS ON PLANTING—IOWA EXPERIENCE. ‘Mr. Suel Foster, of Muscatine, Iowa, in a prize essay on forest-tree planting, offers the following suggestions as applicable in this State:+ _ The larch is of tolerably rapid growth; growing half an inch or more in diame- -ter each year for the first ten years, and the next ten years fully equal to one inch. - This is in-size equal to our black walnut, and it grows much better and - straighter. The little trees should be bought of nurserymen, for it is a nice and -» particular thing to raise the larch or evergreen from seed. JI would recommend . to the farmers of Iowa to buy European larch at two years old, at. $10 to $15 per thousand. They should be set in the nursery rows, 43 feet apart, and one foot in the row, so that when one row is taken out it will make a wagon road through the grove. Larch must be moved very early in the spring, for they are among the very earliest trees to start to grow. The ground should be plowed very deep in the fall, then plowed in the spring, as soon as possible; harrowed and pulverized ’_ very finely by turning the harrow bottom up the last time. Then stretch a line and set with aspade. Have a mud-hole to dabble the roots all in. While the man uses the spade, a boy can handle plants. About 2,000 will be a day’s work, and will cover about a quarter of an acre. They must be carefully plowed and hoed for two years, and if the weeds start too quick in May and June, the third or fourth years they should be plowed. _ Cost.—8,000 plants for an acre, $80; setting out, $8; plowing and hoe- ing the first year, $8; plowing and harrowing the land before setting, $4; second year, $4; two years after, $4; interest on the land at $50; eight - years, at eight per cent.=$52. Total cost of an acre of Europes. larch, at eight years, $140. - Credit—By taking out 3,000 plants after two year’s growth, to set in other ground, at $20 per thousand, $60. It is calculated that 1,000 in - 8,000 will die, although those who are accustomed to handling and cul- _- trvating will not loose so many. Then half the plants are taken out, - leaving them 2 by 4% feet. When they are eight years old they will be poles fit for fence, two or three inches through and fifteen or twenty feet _ high, and another thinning out must be done, by taking out 2,000, leav- - ing the grove 4 by 42 feet. These poles are worth 5 cents each, $100. - At eight years one acre has cost $140, and has a credit of $160. Those transplanted at two years from setting should be set 4 by 4%, covering -about an acre and a half, and will cost, in setting out and cultivating two - years, something over $100, including the plants at $60. PLANTING OF THE ASH. Mr. J. L. Budd, now of Ames, Iowa, in a paper published in the Trans- actions of the Northern Illinois Horticultural Society (1867-68, p. 72), advises keeping the seeds of the ash through the winter in kegs or boxes, *Cited in an address by Dr. John A. Warden, in January, 1873. before the Kansas State Board of Agriculture. Report of that year, p. 262. See also ‘OHIO AGRICULTURAL REPORT,” 1871, p. 55. HfIOWA AGRICULTURAL REPORT,” 1870, p. 328. 40 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. mixed with clean moist sand, taking care that they become neither too wet nor too dry. Freezing will dono harm. The ground sbould be marked and prepared as forcorn, and planted at the inter sections, placing four to six seeds in ahill. They should be carefully cultivated, and the next spring thinned to one plant in each hill, the vacancies being sup- plied. By planting thus thickly, the young trees get a straight growth. At the end of six years, every alternate row north and south should be thinned out, and at the end of ten years every alternate tree in each row. When twelve years old, on good soil and with proper culture the first four years, the grove would have 12,000 trees on 10 acres, averaging 8 in- ches in diameter. By cutting the stump close to the ground, and cover- ing with a light furrow on each side, a second growth is obtained in eight or ten years, more valuable than the first. Prof C. S. Sargent, in speaking of this timber, says: * To develop its best qualities the white ash should be planted in a cool, deep, moist, but well-drained soil, where it will make a rapid growth. That the plan- tation may be as early profitable as possible, the young trees should be inserted in rows three feet apart, the plants being two feet apart in the rows. This would give 7,260 plants to the acre, which should be gradually thinned until 108 trees are left standing, twenty feet apart each way. The first thinning, which might be made at the end of ten years, would give 4,000 hoop-poles, which at present price would be worth $400. The remaining thinnings, made at different periods up to twenty-five or thirty years, would produce some three thousand trees more, worth at least three times as much as the first thinnings. Such cuttings would pay all the expenses of plant- ing, the care of the plantation and the interest on the capital invested, and would leave the land covered with trees capable of being turned into money at a mo-. ments notice, or whose value would increase for a hundred years, making no mean inheritance for the descendants of a Massachusetts farmer. The planting of the white ash as a shade and roadside tree is especially recommended, and for that purpose it ranks, among our native trees, next to the sugar-maple. To some Minnesota tree-planters, a few words about the oak will per- haps be of interest. It has the reputation of being a slow grower, too slow for the planter to reasonably expect any benefit from his work. I am inclined to think this trait in its character has been somewhat exag- gerated. Thousands of acres in Minnesota, are now covered with groves of jack oak, the trees now large enough, to make four good rails from the butt cuts, where only 20 to 25 years ago nothing could be seen but small, short, shrubby brush. Some of these new forests will yield nearly, or quite as much fuel and fencing per acre, as the average primeval forests. Such being the fact, and one not easily rubbed out, may it not be as well to look into this thing from a practical standpoint. Taking a hint from nature, let us look into this grub prairie business a little. We find usually the jack oak grubs most numerous—next burr oak and white oak grubs. How they got there, or how long they have been there are among the things no fellow can find out. With my spade and ax, Ihave ‘“srubbed out” many thousands of them—have dissected them, and ex- amined them critically. I have found them in all periods of existence, from mere rootlings, to masses of roots sufficient for a tree a hundred years old. A very large area of Goodhue Co., Minnesota, the Banner wheat coun- ty of the whole world, was, when I first made tracks over it, covered with such grubs, and had they been left undisturbed by the breaking plow, spade, ax and grub-hoe, and protected from fire and cattle, Goodhue Co. would to-day be one of the finest timbered counties in Minnesota. *Quercus Oak. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. Al Nearly all the great wheat counties of south-east Minnesota, were 25 years ago largely covered with just such grubs. The annaul prairie fires swept over them with great regularity and certainty, annually burning off the brushy tops, but leaving the roots generally uninjured. The roots, protected by the earth from much damage by fire. kept up their subter- raneous growth with great vigor, thus laying up theamount of vital force which has backed up these young forests to such speedy and wonderful development. And now my christian friend, if you are so fortunate as to own a few acres of such grub prairies, guard it as the apple of your eye; suffer no evil to befall it, and in a few years you will count it among the choicest of your earthly possessions. I would thus “pointthe moral, and adorn the tale.” But should you be compelled to commence, de novo, I will try to point out what I would do. After I had gotten my young forest well started; ground well subdued and in a high state of cultiva- tion—the surface tolerably well shaded by other young trees, I would plant the acorns among them. Repeated attempts and repeated failures, have convinced me that the young oak seedling demands considerable shade for a year or two, and won’t tolerate too much hot blazing sun- light. I have had no trouble in growing the young plants to a hight of four to six inches most anywhere, but I have so far found it extremely difficult to get them much further along unless somewhat shaded. The same remarks are perhaps applicable to beech, birch and the coniferous tribe. The permanancy, great durability and longevity of this tree justly entitles it to a very high rank in forestry. With the exception of the conifers, no tree is more generally useful to civilization, none more worthy of cultivation and perpetuity. I now proceed to again plunder that un- failing and inexhaustable fountain of forestry information, (Houghs Re- » port) for further items bearing on this subject. The Oak (Quercus sessilifolia and Q. pedunculata) was relatively more important among forest trees a century or two ago than now. Extensive forests of this timber have since been cleared for cultivation, so that the noblest forests are now among the hills. ‘iss On account of diminishing supply and rising demand for oak timber, much has been done of late to promote its cultivation. Young trees shelter the soil from the sun, but as they advance they demand more - light and room, so that many die unless seasonably thinned. In forests the oak assumes greater dimensions when grown with other oaks alone, for it may be laid down as a rule that it thrives best with the crown free, the stem sheltered and in shade, and the foot wnder covering. The Q. pedunculata is disposed to develope many branches, but where this is not possible (as in forests of beech and oak) the stem is straight and free from branches to 70 or 80 feet, and the whole height 100 to 130 feet. The tap root penetrates 5 or 6 feet in good soil, so that the subsoil is of great importance in its.growth and quality. Moderately cleft and inclined limestones, and the milder clay slates, the richer sandstones and marls, granite, basalt, greenstone and clayey porphyry, and good peat are favorable subsoils for both kinds of oak, as they generally continue fresh, and are not apt to hold water. The timber of this kind is of fine texture, tough, hard, and heavy. It is the strongest and most durable timber grown in large quantities in Europe, and is indispensable in ship building, in the construction of mills, and structures in or near water, and when submerged is indestructible. The Q. sessilifolia does not grow so quickly but has a longer life, is more disposed to form branches, but may. under favorable circumstances grow to equal size. 42 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. The roots do not penetrate so deep, the wood is less tough and elastic, is more easily split, and therefore more prized by coopers. Being of coarser texture it is not so well suited for carving and cabinet work, and being heavier, it forms better firewood, the proportion being as 12 to 11. - As a building timber it is little inferior to the Q. pedunculata. The latter prefers plains, warm sunny valleys, and outlying hills of mountain ranges, while the former is at home on the mountains themselves. They - often grow together, but the Q. sessilifolia ascends the slopes to a greater height, although it does not grow so far north and prefers the south and west slopes. Hee ms ‘The oak is not by nature intended-to form extensive and unmixed forests, but requires the aid of a shade-enduring and soil-improving tree ; for the growth of oak depends less on the kind of soil than on its qual- ity, depth, and freshness. No tree is better qualified to perform these functions than the beech. In eoppice wood with standards or reserved trees, the oak enjoys the sunlight, and does not throw much shade on the coppice below—acquires moderate thickness, but at the expense. of its branches, and comes to greatest maturity at 200 to 240 years, but when well exposed to the sun may be felled much sooner. In order.to obtain valuable timber in such cases, the trees must, ere they grow too old, be stripped of their lower branches. as far as practicable. bisa: _ Oak reproduces itself from stools, and is suitable for coppices, the wood (generally at the period of 16 years) being cut and peeled for tan- ners’ use. The bark is most prized when grown on strong mineral soil on hill-sides in sunny exposures, where the trees have not been too closely planted, and have room for development. It is best before-it begins to split: In higher situations the Q. sessilifolia is said to yield bark in greater quantity and of better quality than the Q. pedunculata. The growth of oak depends less on the kind of soil than on its quality, the amount of humus, and, above all, of moisture contained in it. The _ best growth occurs in a deep, somewhat loose loamy sand, or sandy loam, but it thrives well on loam or sand. Although it prefers moisture, it will not-grow in marshes unless drained. __ ; The oak thrives exceedingly well when mingled with beech, because - its penetrating roots draw their support more from the subsoil, while the beech spreads its roots near the surface. This association -does not prosper, however, in exposed situations or on shallow soils. ) MODE OF PLANTING OAKS RECOMMENDED BY THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF AGRICULTURE, ARTS AND MANUFACTURES. To this society, formed in New York as a State institution in 1791, may undoubtedly be ascribed the first direct recommendation of a.so- ciety for the planting of forests for their timber in the United States. In a circular issued at the beginning, they made particular inquiries concefning the propagation of the locust-tree, the possibility of intro- ducing the white mulberry, and the profit and propriety of raising: in nurseries and transplanting hickory, chestnut, beech, ash, and other trees for fencing and fuel, and the planting of hedges. About 1795, a committee mpadiatean to consider the best mode of pre- serving and increasing the growth of wood and valuable timber, reported in favor of recommending this where the soil was not better adapted to other uses. One of the committee, twenty years before, had allowed land worth $2.50 per acre to grow up to timber, then worth $12 per acre, FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. . 43 besides the land, which had been improved in the meantime. They insisted upon the importance of fencing out cattle;, suggested the pro- . priety of cutting off old woodlands entirely, SO as to. give the young trees an equal start; showed that. woods should. not be. thinned too much, as this would. favor the growth of grass, to the injury of. the trees; and pointed out a method of planting oaks that. deserves notice:. Oaks are best propagated by leaving the acorns on, the. surface, of .the ground, covered with the grass; but in this way the acorns are exposed to be devoured by animals. To prevent this it is recommended to preserve them through the - winter and plant them in the following manner: First make a bed of loam about six inches deep; on this plant the acorns about two inches deep; over them lay another bed of six inches of earth, over that another layer of acerns, and so on, as far as the occasion requires. The whole must be covered with earth, to pre- serve them from the frost. Early in the spring the bed is to be opened, when ~ the acorns, which will have begun to shoot, are to he planted about: a foot’s dis- tance from each other. Another method of planting them, is to dig a small hole with a pick-ax, and drop the acorn, covering it with earth. This is a very simple method, but care must be taken not to bury the seed too deep; two inches is found to be the best depth; the less covering the better, provided the acorn is secured from birds and . other animals, Another practice is to pare the earth with a plow and plant the acorns in rows, covering them with the turf. This is not a'great deal of labor, and will secure the acorns from animals. The distance of the rows may be at any man’s pleasure, but the thicker the trees the sooner will the ground be shaded and the turf destroyed. As the young trees advance the weaker ones yall die, and the vigorous and thrifty ones only survive. * zs * We often see in a transplanted fruit tree the top die down and sprouts . appear from the root, one of which, if spared, may become a.vigorous tree. This is very liable to happen with the oak in bleak and exposed - situations, and foresters sometimes anticipate this by cutting them over ' by the surface of the ground after they have been planted a year, so as to develope new shoots, one of which is saved. In sheltered situations this becomes needless, and no time is lost. in bringing forward the shoot as soon as possible. ee _ The managers of government forests in England, where wok is keine raised for the royal navy, rear the trees from “the acorn, and the trees are found to BOR for the first few years more rapidly, than. if trans- planted. Much Hig of opinion has amaled: as to ihe. distance at: eich _ young oaks should be planted’; in fact, as many views have been ex- _ pressed as there are differences of circumstance. and each in its place may be best. It is often of advantage to, grow “other timber with the oak, and for this the fir has been planted in Scotland with best results, and this in exposed situations becomes essential.as a shelter till the oaks attain a'size to take care of themselves. In such a case, a distarice _ 10 to 12 feet apart for the oaks, and the same for the firs, making the distance between trees of alternate kinds 3} to 4 feet. The firs are cut out in a few years. It is thought that, besides the shelter thus gained, the oaks grow more rapidly with this mixture of. young evergreens among them. (Brown’s Forester, p. 364.) With the oak, its value depends rather onthe quality than the length of its wood, and for ship building (its principal use) a straight trunk is sometimes less prized than one of a proper curve. Now this wood can- not be grown of. best quality unless free access of air is allowed, and hence dense plantings are not economical. James Brown, a Scotch writer, mentions two lots of oak timber, one - one hundred years old, with 200 trees to the acre, that sold. for £360, 44 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. and another of ninety years old, with 109 trees, that brought £868. The latter had grown with free access of air,and had an abundance of bends fit for ship building. But such trees growing low, and with spreading branches, do not yield so much bark for tanning, and for this use a — dense, tall coppice is best for quantity, although its quality is not equal: to that of wood grown in open places.. Oak grown in free air weighs almost double that 1rom a dense shade, and. its bark contains more tannin. | OBLIQUE PLANTING. Among the established rules of planting are the three following. _ 1. Set to the same depth as the plant stood in the nursery. 2. Spread with the hand the fibers of the root in their natural direction. 3. It is essential that the plant should stand upright. A recent writer* has shown that these rules have their exceptions, and, describing the usual manipulation of planting, says: The workman takes the plant in his left hand, holds it vertically in the middle of the hole to the proper depth, and with the right hand (not particularly caring for the direction of the roots), fill in the earth around the plant, crowding it down as it fills up, and press it down with the feet. The operation thus desribed would be called well done, if executed carefully and without slighting. But as we turn in and press down the earth, the radicles are crowded together in a vertical. di- rection, like the rods of an umbrella when shut, instead of being in a natural pos- ition, and more or less plants will be lost. My plan would be as follows: . Having thrown out the dirt, I would put about half of it back, so as to make a slope on one side, against which I would lay the plant, the roots being of the same depth as before being drawn. _ In this positionitis easy with either hand to spread out the radicles, and finish by filling the hole and pressing in the earth, as com- monly done.. Plantations thus executed in 1859 appear now sensibly better than those in adjacent grounds, executed at the same time and in the common way. But in this case the plants were burried deeper than the rule prescribes, and to this may be due a part of the success. In deciduous plantations it is a rule to trim the young plants more or less, so as to preserve a due balance between the roots, torn and lessened by the extraction, and the top. Resinous species should never be subjected to this operation, but they generally shed more or less of the lower leaves, which amounts to the same thing, and leave only a tuft of small branches and leaves at the top, exposed to the winds and the weight of snows, which are most liable to injury the first winter. It therefore appears probable that a young plant would suffer less to have these lower leaves burried, han to lose them by drying in the air, and that planting a _ little deeper is beneficial—rules to the contrary. On the other hand, if we plant young oaks in autumn, some vertically and oth- ers horizontally (it might not be the same in spring, and I give my own exper- iences), it does not appear to show any difference. It appears chiefly important that the plants be laid deep enough, while by the oblique method the roots are | most easily placed somewhat in their first position. . As to expense in planting, the difference of time is from 15 to 20 per cent. in favor of the method recommended, which has moreover a decided advantage of not being so liable to damage from the heaving of frost. . I do not hesitate to recommend the burying of more of the stem than was coy- ered before, the proportion extending to two-thirds or more. PLANTATION OF EVERGREENS—PROFESSOR AMOS EATON’S DIREC- NS. Prof. Amos Eaton, in his Geological and Agricultural Survey of Rens- selaer County, New York (1822), alluding to the difficulty of transplant- ing evergreens, attaches importance to the most careful handling and to es, *M. Regimberu, in the “Revue des Eaux et Forets,” 1875, p. 139. The above is but a condensed ab- stract of this article. : ’ / : FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 45 the keeping of the roots moist by retaining the soil upon them, or cov- ering with wet moss, cloths, &c. They succeed best, according to his observation, when the roots were not bent or distorted in planting. They should be cut off at a distance of one or two feet from the stem, and tak- en up without force or without wounding the body or limbs. He laid down the rule of never cutting off a limb until at least a year after trans- planting, and of never pruning evergreens at first close to the stem. He would leave four or five inches, which, after it had withered and died, might be cut loose without injury to the wounded part, which should be covered with some kind of adhesive paste. In selecting evergreens from the woods, care should be taken to obtain only those that grew in open and exposed situations, and, as nearly as might be, from a soil in composition, texture, and dryness as nearly as - possible like that to which it is to be transferred. Deciduous forest-trees required less care, excepting oak, walnut, and ash trees, which required the same treatment as evergreens. EVERGREEN. PLANTING: IN ILLINOIS AND IOWA. __ Mr. Samuel Edwards, formerly of Mendota, Tll., who has had an ex- tensive experience in planting evergreens, states his belief that the sur- face soils of lowa and Illinois appear to be well adapted to this class of trees.* He remarks: Extensive plantings of pines and junipers may be made with perfect safety on sandy soils, and those having a thin layer of porous surface soil.. But on such _ soils I would not advise any one to put out plants of less size than 1 foot in hight; 9-foot plants would do better. Excessively dry seasons are almost certainly fatal to small plants on such soils. Puddling the roots with clay mortar is always ad- visable when planting out evergreens, being sure to have roots perfectly wet when placed in position for covering with dirt. In such soils, too, it 1s best to set deep- er than the plants stood in nursery. In moist localities arbor vitaes and spruces are perfectly at home. _ In the discussion of this papar the opinion was expressed that the Norway spruce was the best ornamental evergreen for Eastern Iowa. The white pine had proved healthy, but the Scotch and Austrian pines had been badly infested with a kind of aphis, which injured the tree. In dry soils, evergreens had suffered from drought, but on porous soils they had generally grown with success. The relatively dry air of the West, as compared with that of Europe, appeared to account for the great difference observed with respect to the locations and conditions under which evergreens will thrive. It was remarked by one who had seen planting operations in Europe that— Wherever a larch, spruce, or pine can be started, (even with rock near to the surface,) the plants grow with a luxuriance we can never attain here under the most - favorable conditions. The forester there goes to his work of planting coniferous _ seedlings with the plants wrapped up in a dry rag. He makes a hole with a tool provided for the purpose, sticks in the plant without regard to shape or position of the roots. The cavity is closed by a movement of the tool and a motion of the _-foot, and the work is done. Yet the plants rarely fail to grow, and that with a _vigor wonderful to behold on such sterile soil. EVERGREEN PLANTING—METHODS AND ADVICE OF MR. R. DOUGLAS. Mr. Robert Douglas, of Waukegan, II1., in a lecture before the Kansas State Horticultural Society, sums up the whole substance of success in transplanting evergreens ina few words: “Plant early in the spring; *‘Transactions of lowa Horticultural Society”? 1875, p. 124. - A6 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. never allow ‘the roots to become dry, and pack the ground tight, ‘so that. they cannot shake about or be moved by the winds.” He would plant as-soon as the frost is out of the ground, (first puddling the roots as soon as Yeceived), and plant a little deeper than they: had grown in the nur- sery. The center of the hole should be elevated to set the tree on, and thé roots should:be spread out and filled in compactly, and particularly under the tree, so that it will not sink. Later. , In his own practice he sowed the seeds in the spring, until May, in | beds 4 feet wide, broadcast, and raked in.. The young plants must be — choice of kinds for different situations was as follows: °... - Aierican arbor ‘vitae; for higher hedges and screens, plant Norway spruce; for | sdf Bu oO er EVERGREEN SEEDLINGS—OBSERVATIONS OF H. M. THOMPSON, OF av ae ‘SAINT FRANCIS, WIS. “Losses have very often been experienced in transplanting evergreen. seedlings, and these have often been attributed to the tact that they had been grown in the shade; but this result, Mr. Thompson thought, was not wholly. due to, the sudden transition from shade to sunlight, but to other causés, such as the pulling up of the plants instead of digging with:a, spade, :impertect packing, and exposure of the roots tothe air. It is well. known that shade is one of the most essential requirements of a young evergreen plant, enabling it to retain an equable volume of moisture, and preventing evaporation from the soil. In order to ascertain what would . be the result of exposure to full sunlight, in the spring of 1874 he had- removed the screens from several beds of one-year-old Norway seedlings — and:Scotch pines, and from two-year-old Austrian pines and arbor vitaes.’ During May and a part of June, the moisture was sufficient for a fine growth, and favorable to the development of buds and ripening of the wood. But for five successive days in July, the heat was excessive, ris- ing ‘from 98 to 103 degrees: the surrounding objects tended to hinder a free circulation of air, and the heat and evaporation must have been ex- cessive. iat “ a ** Transactions of Kansas State Horticultural Society,”1872, p. 182. In some localities the lareh, grown rapidly, has come to the size of a tine-looking tree before its wood hus hardened, and such tim- ber by no means justifies the reputation for durability here given. Our experience with this tree has not yet been sutticiently long to enable us to determine how far this valuable property in the timber Will be acquired by age. _ FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. AZ Tn autumn it was found that the loss of the Norway spruce was about fifteen per cent. ; arbor vitae fifteen per cent.; Scotch pine less than half. of one-per cent.;.Austrian pine no loss. The loss of the former of these was attributed to the fact that the lateral roots of these species of seed- lings grow nearer the surface, and are, therefore, more lable to injury from heat and evaporation. In August of the same year, he transplant- ed 10,000 Scotch pines from the beds that had been exposed, with a loss of less than half of one per cent. In June and July, 1873, hetransplant- ed about. 30,000 Norway spruce, two to six inches in hight, without: loss ; these transplantings being at an unsual season of the year, but in a cool damp atmosphere, and in a wet soil aftet a rain, the June and July trans- planted seedlings being sheltered by lath screens; the August planting of Scotch pine having no protection until nearly a month after the trans- planting was completed. His practice had been for years to bed out all seedlings less than six inches in hight, and protect them the first season with a cheap screen ; larger sized seedlings either bedded out or planted in nursery rows and mulched; the loss trom drought under this treat- ment being too trifling to mention. His deductions from these observa- tions were—that nursery-grown seedlings haye an ample supply of roofs, . if properly handled, planted, and cared for, will survive and produce sut- - isfactory results.* — - : By ; ON THE PROPAGATION OF EVERGREENS—EXPERIENCE OF A SUC- CESSFUL PLANTER. ‘Mr. Samuel Edwards, of Illinois, who has had eminent: success in planting evergreens, at the University course of lectures and discussions held at Rockford, Il.,in February, 1870, made the following statements " concerning the handling of evergreens: . Ihave hada good many years’ experience with evergreens. Growing them from seed in ordinary seasons on our prairies is rather difficult. A wet season,” like the last, is better; but, asa rule, those who are inexperienced had better buy their trees. ! To grow evergreens, soil that is about one-third sand, with some mold, should beused. The seeds should be covered once or twice theirdiameter. They should be'sown early to prevent their “damping off.” This arises from excess of moist- ure in hot weather. We sow on dry sand to check it. Sow the seeds in beds four feet wide ; about two pounds of the seeds of the European larch, or of the pines to the square rod. Cover the young plants with leaves the first winter. Leave the plants two years in the beds before transplanting. Birds are fond of the seeds, and must be watched. In getting trees from the forests, plant them as - quickly as possible, and put a shade of laths over them. Plant them closely in the bed; leave them in the bed generally two years, and then plant the rows two and a half feet apart, put the trees close together in the rows. We sowed our _ seeds last year at Green Bay. The atmosphere is not so dry there ; the birds are the only trouble. I prefer to plant evergreens when in astate of rest, but they can be moved in a moist day until late in the season. In that case I would plant late in the evening, water heavily, and protect them the next day from the sun. Trees for belts I place ten feet apart in the row, and break the» joints with the next row. , Red cedar has generally succeeded pretty well until three or four years ago. Hemlock is grown best in partial shade. The American yew is fine in the shade. It is similar in leaf to the European, and to the hemlock. It is propagated read- ily from cuttings in the shade, late in May. The Norway spruce will bear shear- ing well; as also the arbor vite. $ [In answer to queries:] When the branches are too thick, taking out the alter- nate branches often does very well. It will answer to move seedlings that have “Transactions of Wisconsin State Horticultural Society ,”” 1875, p. 90. 48 _ FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. not been transplanted, if you are careful. I would just as soon have trees from the woods; but they must be carefully handled, and be small ones, not more than four to twelve inches in height. Red pine is difficult to handle. Austrian pine is attacked by a fungus. I find it here at Rockford. Siberian arbor vite does very well here. In the shade, it roots readily from cuttings made with a part of the last year’s wood left on.+ Mr. Edwards, in an article published in the Iowa Agricultural Report of 1871 (page 346), explains more fully seme points of his method in propagating evergreens and larches: The beds are made four feet wide, for convenience of weeding. By sowing so early, the plants attain the woody fiber before hot weather, which is so fatal to the plants while young. The beds when sown may be covered with damp moss, rags. or something of the kind; this is to be closely watched, and removed when the plants begin to show themselves. . Arbor vitee and many varieties of juniper are readily grown from cuttings four to six inches long, taken off in May, or the fore _ part of June, with an inch or two of last year’s wood, and planted two-thirds of their length in the ground, the lower end in pure sand. Cuttings of this kind, and of small plants of evergreens should be shaded in time of extended drought, and should receive a liberal watering every two or three weeks, followed, before the “surface dries with a mulching of dry torest leaves, sawdust, or other litter. The -idea formerly so prevalent that evergreens were more difficult to transplant suc- cessfully than deciduous trees, is not sustained by extended experience. Itisnow _.ogenerally known that the roots of evergreens must never dry in the least while -out of the ground. Transplanting can be done from opening of spring until time of bursting of the buds. yen after growth of an inch has taken place, they may be successfully planted if the roots are grouted as soon as they are taken from the ground and well watered and mulched when planted. Shading the tops when late planted makes success still more certain. Early planting is always advisable. In a elt time of severe drouth large specimens, at other times nearly certain to die, may _ be safely transplanted if the work is carefully done and the tops are watered each ~* evening. From the time when the terminal buds are formed until the middle of ‘September, transplanting may be done with sefety. In an extreme instance, I - had good success with a lot of thirty or forty, from the forests of Colorado, planted at their arrival, just at the opening of winter, by covering with leaves so deep as - almost if not entirely to exclude the frost. It has been generally supposed that late fall planting of evergreens, or taking up plants in the fall and preserving them _for early spring planting or shipment, could not be done. Robert Douglas & Son, ' of Waukegan, lll., however, have for two past winters kept millions of young - plants in their frost-proof lighted greenery with the most perfect success. Their . discovery or.use of this mode is of great value, for those wanting trees sent South can thereby plant much earlier, and have them established and growing before ' the dry, hot weather comes on. Immense quantities of evergreen plants will be in demand during the next few years in the prairie States. Our people thus far have only thought of planting them for ornamental trees on the lawn or for screens. But timber culture in earnest is about to begin. European larch and the pine will doubtless be planted in immense numbers. From experience in planting larches four to six feet high in the fall, it is my opinion that we shall eventually adopt the plan of setting out our two-year and older larches at that season. If small, mulch liberally. When set in spring, they ought to be put out very early, as they start the first thing in spring. They do not thrive, unless planting is done before starting. Many evergreens were injured by the unprecedented freeze of last October, in conjunction with the excessively wet season. This conclusion seems probable from the fact that evergreens in very dry situations were almost entirely exempt from injury. While tree planters regret losses from casuaities of this kind—to the men whose hearts are in the business, such drawbacks act only as incentives to increased diligence in the good work. True manhood, it has been well said, is only developed in bravely meeting and, under God, overcoming obstacles. MANAGEMENT OF THE PINE TRIBE.* At the sixth meeting of the British Association for the Advancement + ‘Third Report of Trustees of Illinois Industrial University,’ p. 385. **Transactions Brit. Asso. Sci.,’’ 1836, p. 104. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 49 of Science (1836) a paper from John Nuttal, of Tittour, county of Wick- low, was read on this subject. Having noticed that almost all the plants of Pinus sylvestris and other species, when planted in a light clay-slate soil, on. exposed ‘situations, grow too rapidly, or out of proportion to their rootings, and thereby become wind-waved, and that those which, by accident, had lost their leaders took a strong hold on the ground, he commenced .a series of experiments, as follows: In the spring, when the buds were fully developed, he went over those that were suffering from the foregoing causes, and.broke off all the buds except those on short branches. By this processtheir upward growth is checked for a -year, the: trunk increases in bulk, and the plant roots much more freely than if:the shoots had been allowed to grow. | New buds are formed during the summet, and in the following spring these plants present the most vigorous aspect. The larch he cuts down to a strong lateral branch, on the windward side, when possible. These soon begin to spread their roots, inerease in size similarly, and utimately become choice trees. In some instances he had cut them down a second time, when he found it necessary, and with equally good effect. PLANTING OF WILD EVERGREENS IN IOWA, AS RECOMMENDED ‘BY D. W. ADAMS. The following suggestions upon the planting and care of evergreens, by D. W. Adams, Esq., of Waukon, Iowa, is founded upon experience, and is worthy of attention. . . I have practiced the following method of taming wild evergreens, with perfect success: At'the proper season for transplanting, proceed to the grove where the young plants‘are abundant, well furnished with common boot or other convenient sized boxes, moss, pruning-knife, spades, and buckets. Make a puddle of rich earth and water; as fast as the plants are raised, prune away the dead and de- formed branches, dip the roots in the puddle, and pack upright in the boxes, with damp moss among the roots, and so continue until the box is crowded as full as possible. But one tier should be put ina box. Then nail a few slats on the top, but be sure’ and have plenty of ventilation, as there is great danger of their heat- ing if the boxes are closed too tightly. As fast as the boxes are filled, place them in a cool, shady place till all are full; then load them on a wagon and lose no time in taking them to their destination, where, of course, they should be planted without delay, in‘accordance with the directions given for seedlings. If your plants are taken from a situation much shaded, which is not advisable, it will be well to give them alittle shade during the first summer. When young evergreens are taken froni' thé forests, it is seldom advisable to plant them ‘at once in their permanent location. Usually they are poor, weak, straggling things, not at all ornamental.” They should be taken from the wood to the nursery, where, after receiving from two to four years’ careful culture, as described for seedlings, they will become of a rich dark green color, the foliage will become dense, and the form symmetrical. Then they are prepared to come out and display their charms ~ upon the lawn, or show their usefulness and beauty in the grove or screen. Selection of Varveties in Planting Evergreens in Iowa. The varieties of evergreens adapted to the climate of our State (Iowa) are not very numerous, but most of them have more or less good qualities to recommend them. Of course, before selecting his varieties, the planter will decide upon the object to be attained by the planting. If his object be shelter, he will choose strong, rapid-growing varieties, that are cheaply procured and easily transplanted. If he is growing a grove for timber, wood, or fencing, he will, of course, keep in view the particular object for which they are intended, and select accordingly ; while for ornament alone, he would make a very different selection. Perhaps a +‘‘ Iowa Horticultural Reports,”* 1867, p. 16. 4 50 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. wore or too descriptive of some of the more valuable kinds wouldnot be out of the way. First on the list for general usefulness, I place the Norway spruce. It is easily transplanted, of rapid growth, fine form, and grows to a large size. It makesa very ornamental hedge or screen, is a fine single tree on the lawn, or a shelter belt impenetrable to the wind. Scotch pine is easily transplanted, grows rapidly while young, and makes a strong, spreading tree, that always gives satisfaction to planters. I know of no evergreen that wlll make a shelter so quickly, and the young trees are very ornamental. Austrian or black pine is every way a much finer tree than the Scotch, except that while young it is a slower grower, and is more impatient of removal. A large Austrian pine, clothed in its garb of rich dark green, standing up unscathed against our fiercest and coldest wintry blasts, looks the very impersonation of sturdy vigor and health. White pine has many friends, and is the most valuable of al] the'pines as a lumber tree. It is of rapid - growth, has beautiful light green soft foliage, but is rather difficult to transplant. Red cedar is a tree of moderate growth, easily transplanted, valuable for screens, - and invaluable for posts, as the wood is very durable. White cedar, or Arbor vitze, is also useful for ornament and screens, but will not be largely planted. The native spruces, when they can be procured cheaply, are of much value, and ma be extensively used in groves or otherwise. Balsam fir is probably the least val- uable of all I have mentioned. While young, it is quite ornamental, and is easily transplanted, but it soon becomes shabby, 1 is comparatively short-lived, and the wood is of very little value for any purpose whatever. TRANSPLANTING OF LARGE EVERGREENS AND OTHER LARGE TREES, AS RECOMMENDED BY MR. D. C. SCOFIELD, OF ELGIN, ILL.* Large nursery-grown, oft-transplanted trees, may be removed with as much certainty of their living as small ones. The ‘hardy evergreens, such as Norway _ spruce, Scotch, Weymouth (or white), and black Austrian pines, may be removed from the height of twelve to eighteen feet as safely as from two to four feet. The method .of removing is the same as of small trees, and they have no more need of a large ball of earth to secure their growth than a plant of twelve inches. True they must be taken up with great care to preserve the roots from breaking on being moved, or from exposure to a dry atmosphere, and when set, especial care must be taken to keep the roots in their natural position, thoroughly. pack- ing the earth among all the roots with the fingers, so as to exclude the air and retain moisture. This should be done by suspending the tree in the hole, which should be made sufficiently large not only to receive the roots of the tree, but also the planter to readily get to his task. The earth must be in as fine tilth as for planting corn, and must never be wet. or muddy, and when thus planted the earth around should be pressed thoroughly with the feet, and when well planted, a quantity of coarse mulching of rotten straw, leaves, or better, spent tan-bark, should be put around the tree and cover the surface from two to four feet on all sides, and from three to six inches in depth; but do not pack too closely against the trunk of the tree. Three strong stakes six feet high should be set four or five feet from the tree at equal distances from each other. A collar or band should be fixed around the tree five or six feet:from the ground, to which strong hay bands should be fastened, and then to each stake a piece of fence- -wire, which will not shrink or expand. In the transit, the roots should be secured with moist fine straw, hay, or moss, so that they shall not at all lose their native condition. When the tree is thus set a few pailfulls of water may be poured upon the ground so as to settle it, as if a great rain had done the work. When dry, spade up often, and mellow the soil to give the air circulating and condensing room in hot weather, Then replace the mulching about the tree. The less of earth retained in which the tree for- merly stood the better, as from it the substance or nutriment necessary to feed the tree is entirely exhausted, and the myriads of feeding roots running off in every direction have been left in the ground. To retain the entire ball as when removed in the frost, would be to not only stop the growth of the tree, but to starve it to death before the fibrous roots could extend far enough to. procure nec- essary food. I have had large evergreen trees stand thus, scarcely living for three — ** Report of lowa State Horticultural Society,” 1857, p. 22, FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 51 or four years, and only from freely feeding the ball with liquid manure were they kept alive; for in our ignorance we supposed we must remove as much earth as possibe to make an evergreen live. We now send our large trees off by the car- load, that are several days on the transit, and yet all are reported to live. The difference between the forest-grown evergreen and the nursery-grown is, the former has but few roots, the latter has them in great abundance, and numer- ous in proportion to the number of times it has been transplanted, by which a ereat mass of central roots hold in their custody with what may be called “a death grasp” a quantity of earth, while the former will retain none. The tree also makes a more compact shade and more beautiful for oft transplanting. Per- haps no tree in the whole forest family is more tenacious of life when rightly handled, and in the right season, than the evergreen, and no tree is more sure to die from improper exposure. The sap of the evergreen is resinous, and coagulates in the sun’s heat as soon as the bark of the root becomes warm in a dry atmos- phere, and cannot be dissolved by any application whatever: the flow of life is obstructed and consequently the tree dies. But let the roots be kept moist, the ereat supply of resin in every department of the tree more active and abundant from its ever-living foliage, every leaf of which forming a part of the active life- giving influence, becomes more tenacious of life than any other tree. Pine trees were taken from my ground last spring, each one of which filled a lumber wagon box, and only one could. be carried in the load, and yet grew apparently as well as if left standing in their native bed, though not as much. There have been many hundreds of large trees taken annually from my grounds, and yet only in the-case of bad treatment have any perished. eddie: : To the above the secretary adds a remark, that it is highly important before setting trees that have had their roots puddled, to dip them in water to dissolve or soften the soil that has dried upon them. If received late in the fall, he advises that they be heeled in, in a sloping position, just before the ground freezes, the soil being finely mingled with the roots and between the tops, and thus cover them completely. If planted in the fall, they will usually dry out, especially in a snowless winter, and all living circulation, except in the roots alone, will be thereby for- ever stopped. He adds as his experience, that the white pine is one of the easiest and safest of all evergreens to plant. MISTAKES IN PLANTING FOR ORNAMENT-* In planting for ornament, a want of taste is often exhibited in arranging the specimens. A little careful thinking before commencing operations will often avoid after-regrets over our mistakes. It is a mistake to plant trees too close to our dwellings. It is a mistake to plant all trees in parallel lines, as they look stiff and repulsive to the eye. Still one row running parallel to the public road is admissible; but in this case do not plant them too near together, so as to ob- struct a view of the road when they attain size and age. We may also suggest that obstruction of desirable points of view should be considered in all our plant- ing of trees. Plant the inside rows in graceful curved lines, with here and there a group of from eight to ten acres. Plant only one variety of trees in each group; but do not plant all the trees in curves and groups. Single specimens properly distributed are objects of interest to the eye, and where the size of grounds per- mits eight or ten trees in a circle present a fine appearance. Do not mix decidu- ous trees with evergeens in groups, rows, or circles. It gives a mixed, broken expression to the lawn in winter. While we may imitate nature in our groupings, yet it is a part of the art of prairie and city lawn making to modify, and even improve on nature’s capricious modes of planting and arranging. The preceding pages concerning evergreens, afford much valuable in- formation to the tree-planter ; and this branch of the subject would now be allowed to drop, had we not something in the way of a Minnesotians experience in this branch of forestry. The following paper, entitled, a “ Plea for the Evergreen,” was prepared perou a report by Samuel Bowers, with discussions that followed. ‘Iowa Hort. Report,” 1875 page 97. 52 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. expressly for this work, at my urgent solicitation. Having personally known the author, Mr. Kepner, for many years, as an unusually success- ful tree-planter; as a practical, conscientious man; and, as one of the most successful horticulturists in Minnesota. I regard this Minnesota experience, as given by Mr. Kepner, as of great practical value, and very appropriately entitled to a place among these pages. A PLEA FOR THE EVERGREEN. Of the delightful prospects to be seen on our prairies, in the summer, no Minnesotian need be told ; the older settlements, dotted as far as the eye can reach, with beautiful groves of young timber; ranging, in size, from the clump of a few specimens, to the tract of twenty acres, or more. These groves have nearly all grown up, within the memory of the older settlers, and have transformed, what was then, a monotonous landscape, into a country, so beautiful, that it seems a blessed privilege, even to live in it. Now, let us look at this same picture in the winter. We drive along over the same country ; but, how every thing is changed! This is the same road ; here, are the same farm-houses; here are the same groves; but, they are leafless,—and, there is no color, to brighten up the view; and there is scarcely anything to obstruct the fury of the fierce winds! We are disappointed! We thought these farmers had wind-breaks— about their habitations. So they had, in the summer, when the necessity for them was not very apparent. And we drive over many weary miles of this kind of country ; but, we must acknowledge, that it is very cold; and, notwithstanding the many tine buildings which we see, on every hand, the country has not that home-like aspect, which has lingered in our memory, since our summer visit. But, here, at last, we find a different scene. The atmosphere has changed,—it appears to us, by contrast,—to that of Indian summer. We hear the wind howling in the air, overhead ; but, we do not feel it, as we did ; but, now, what is the matter ? Here are some hundreds of evergreen trees, disposed in groups and belts, about a farm-house, which we find, on inquiry, to have been trans- planted, from the forest, a dozen years ago, by the proprietors own hands ; at no appreciable expense, save the few days work then, with additions of other trees, since, from time to time, and occasional day of loving care and attention afterwards. Here, we have a green landscape, a bit of summer, in the middle of winter. . Nothing very fine yet, it is true, but promising much in the future; but, still, enough to add much to the attractions of the home ; enough to reduce the cost of the winters fuel quite noticeably ; enough to shelter every living thing about the place in the coldest storms, of the coldest winters ; and, enough to repay the planter many times its cost,in beauty alone ; for, “a thing of beauty, is a joy forever,” and, is worth striving for, even on the farm. And it is to the eye,—to the love of the beautiful, to which we must largely appeal to make farm-life more attractive, and this keeps the boys and girls on the homestead, instead of going to town, for we must ac- knowledge, that, in home adornment, our city friends are far ahead of us. The foregoing is no fancy picture, and the object of this paper, will be | to induce the farmers of Minnesota, to assist, and, to try to show them how, they may assist in greatly multiplying the bright side of this FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 53 picture. Or, in other words; that, in planting about the home, many evergreens should be used for the groundwork; and, a few deciduous ones, for variety, instead of many cottonwoods, &c., &c., and a few ever- ereens, as now; that is, to reverse, in a measure, the usual order of planting about the house and grounds; in this, our cold and bracing climate, and thus have shelter and beauty in the winter, when both will be more appreciated, than they are in the summer. When it is taken into consideration, how easily the different kinds of native varieties are transplanted ; and, how very fast some of them grow, in almost any kind of soil, we are greatly astonished, in traversing the country, to see how very few people have availed themselves of the bountiful supplies which nature has furnished, in many parts of our State, and which can be had merely for the trouble of digging. And, when these are not available, we can have recourse to those of nursery- men, who make a specialty of evergreens ; or, to those persons who ad- vertise in our agricultural and horticultural journals, to furnish forest seedlings, in any desired quantity, either of which parties, will furnish enough to shelter the home. for a very few dollars. ; VARIETIES. That sort which is found to succeed best in your locality, is the sort most largely to plant. For instance: In this part of the State, (in east Olmstead county ), there is nothing like the white pine. We have planted a hundred fold more of this, than of any other variety. One on the lawn, twelve inches high when planted, thirteen (13) years ago, measures to-day, with tape-line, 8 inches from the ground, forty-one (41) inches in circumference, and twenty-one, (21) good, long paces around the lower tier of branches. The pines,—Austrian, Scotch and Black, are all good. So is red cedar and arborvite. So, also, is Balsam fir. But, it is not desirable to enumerate, as each one will be obliged to content himself with such as will be best adapted to his needs. The important business is, to plant, and to do the work with care; when, in nearly all cases, there will be success. The per-centage of loss, with me, is no larger in evergreens, than in cottonwoods, or any other variety of deciduous trees. PREPARATION OF SOIL, PLANTING, &c. Any soil that will grow a good crop of wheat, will be suitable for ever- greens. It must be well prepared,—deeply plowed, and finely pulver- _ized. It may be last seasons breaking, or the oldest land on the farm; there is very little difference, but in either case it ought to be mellow, and in good heart. A good plan is to-prepare a strip, where there is to be a permanent wind-break; on the North or West side of the lot, which it is desired to improve; and for two rows of trees, of large growing kinds, as the pines, or spruces ; about twelve (12) feet wide; for smaller grow- ing sorts, 10 feet will do. In this strip, mark out two rows, or draw two ee five (5) feet apart, for the large, or four (4) for the smaller growing inds. Now we are ready for the trees; and if they are to come from the for- est, we choose a rainy, or at least a cloudy day in the spring, (never in the fall), just about the beginning of seeding ; or, if time is no object with you, wait till the buds swell; (don’t wait till they have grown), the time of which will vary nearly a month, in the different varieties. This is the very best time to move all sorts of overgreens, although we know, that an 54 FOREST TRE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. expert can transplant them successfully at almost any season of the year. Take your wagon, a few wet horse blankets, to cover the trees as fast as dug ; and go to the place previously selected, and carefully dig and cover such treesas you wish, always remembering,—and I wish to impress this fact upon the mind of every one who undertakes this business :—THAT THE ROOTS MUST NOT RE ALLOWED TO DRY IN THE LHAST; or be exposed to the sun or wind, for a moment, if you wish firstrate success ; and if the roots should once be- come nearly dry, throw them away at once, as it will only be labor lost to take them home and plant them: And also, if you wish to make fine trees in the future, you must be content to select small ones now, from two (2) to eighteen (18) inches high; the smaller the better. Nursery grown trees may safely be somewhat larger; but even in this. case small ‘ ones will be best, and they will certainly cost less. If you are obliged to use nursery grown trees, select. or order your trees early ; dont be put off till June. Two or three year-old seedlings, which will be from two (2) to eight (8) inches high, will be most profitable, but if it suits your case, get them larger. PROPAGATION BY SEEDS. Raising evergreen seedlings is a very simple and easy process to one who understands how to go about it; but to the novice it is very slow and unsatisfactory; and believing that the time gained by the former, in planting trees already grown, will more than compensate for the dif ference in first cost, even if he should succeed and grow first rate seed- lings, I would not advise planters generally to raise their own trees, but will here give, for the benefit of those who wish to do so, a method which has succeeded well with me: Send your order to a reliable seedsman early enough to have your seeds on hand by the time the ground will be fit to work in the spring. Make long, narrow beds, east and west if possible, not more than two (2) feet wide, with eighteen (18) inch alleys between. Sow seeds broad- - cast twice as thickly as you would sow oats, (5 or 6 bushels to the acre,) and cover nearly one (1) inch deep by sifting over them good, mellow soil with a coarse seive. It will be a good plan, if you have time, to prepare your beds in the fall previous, so that the seeds can go in early in spring, as it is quite important that the young plants should have a good start before hot weather sets in. Having the seeds in the ground, the next thing will be to stick brush (evergreen wili be best but others will do) along the south side of the bed, to partially shade them, so that the sun will not shine long at a time upon any one place; as, without this shading, the young - plants will be scorched nearly as fast as they come up. If the weather is dry, the ground must be well soaked once a week. But if the weather should be wet it must not be kept too moist or too much shaded after the - plants are up or they will rot. If they appear likely to do this, a little dry road dust sprinkled on them, if you have it on hand, will be a good prevention. We must now keep our beds clear of weeds, and the wis- dom of having them narrow will be apparent, as we can weed them from one side without disturbing the brush. Here our seedlings must remain till two (2) years old; when, if they have done well, they will usually be from two (2) to eight (8) inches high, and ready for transplanting to the nursery. In fie first fall, with one summer’s growth, most varieties will be very FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 55 small, having really only well made their appearance above ground; and to prevent the frost, in the following spring from heaving them out, they must be covered with brush, or straw, or mats; but take care that you do not make a harbor for mice. And to avoid this it would be better . not to cover till nearly spring. In the first fall after the little seedlings have been transplanted to the nursery rows, the earth should be drawn about them, (early in the spring will do) so that the alternate freezing . and thawing shall not heave them out. In the second summer they will not need shading, only keep them clean, and if the weather is dry, water as in the first season. (Propagating evergreens by any other method than seeds is impracticable for general use.) Now, having our ground prepared and the trees on hand, we proceed to plant them, about a foot apart in the rows, as carefully as we would so many cabbage plants—putting them in the ground as deeply as their size will permit, and if the ground is at all dry, watering them thus :— After planting and half filling the holes of a dozen or more with fine dirt, go back and pour water enough into each hole to completely soak the ground about the roots; then, when the water all soaks away, fill up with dry, fine earth, and thus continue to do till all are planted. Never water on the surface as this bakes the ground. Having now planted all our trees, we have nothing more to do but to keep them clean with hoe and cultivator, as we should keep so many rows of corn, till harvest time, when they may be let alone tiil fall, when they should be weeded again. We never mulch small trees, when we have them in rows » so that they can be cultivated, without the soil is very sandy, and then only in an exeessively dry time. We have now established a nursery from which to draw, from year to year, as we may need them to set about the house and barn, or to sell to our ‘neighbors—remembering that we must leave enough for our wind- break, and that for this purpose, they should be all of one variety; that is, that each wind-break should be of one kind of trees, as two or more kinds do not look well, even if they should grow as well, which they will not. They should be about five feet apart in the rows for the larger growing kinds and four for the smaller, and stand thus:— .*.°.°.° zigzag, like a worm fence. In transplanting larger specimens to the lawn or grounds greater care must be taken to preserve as many roots as may be, and if possible, to take up a good ball of earth with each one; and also if the roots seem to be few, shortening the branches as we would those of any other trees, except in the case of those trees (like the pines) which grow only from the ends of the branches. Here we must not cut the top tier of branches, nor the main leader. Large trees should have large holes, and be well watered—the same as our small trees—and well mulched with rotten stable manure, as in this case mulching will be much better than cultivation. If the position is exposed to the wind a good plan is to stay the tree with three small wires, one end of each fastened to the body of it with a leather strap, or some other soft material, which will not injure the bark, and fasten the other ends to the ground with pegs, for a year or two, till the roots have firmly taken hold. Trees of almost any size, can be successfully transplanted, if the nec- essary time and care be taken, but such trees are very costly, and would be entirely unavailable. For the general planter, and, where fine specimens are to be the result, the small ones will be far the best, every time, even if there is no differ- ence in the cost. 56 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. For a forest, the trees can be as large as you desire to handle, as. the object here, is ‘to grow a straight, tall, trunk, and not side branches, as is : the,casein our ornamental trees and wind- breaks, and they. should be set in check-rows, about four teet apart each ” way, so that they can be cultivated with horse- -power, like corn, and when they grow to such size, that itis no longer possible to cultivate them, we can remove every other tree, leaving them quincunx; and when they again become. too thick, te take out the centre one of each five, when they will be eight. feet apart ~ each way, and will be about right for our permanent forest. Political economists now assure us, that the limit of the wooden,age, shall have been reached in about fifty years, if there is not something done to arrest the rapid destruction of our forests, generally, and: more especially, of our pine forests, whose products enter so largely. into. the construction of almost everything i in the country. In fact, affect almost _ } all industries directly, or indirectly. We can not see any plan by which this necessary destruction can be stopped ; nor would it be. desirable, Xe) long, as on this very destruction depends the welfare of so many of our | population. Of the unnecessary waste of these products, it is not in our province, now to speak ; but, we would urge upon Congress, to take some effective measures to forestall the consequences of this waste.and de- struction, by offering a premitim, if néed be, to every land-owner in the Union, whose soil and climate will be'suitable for growing pine timber ; not only i in the new, but in the older’States as well, and. thus, if not put off till the end shall have really come, the supplies can be kept up, ad infinitum. Some of the older people of the world have thus kept up their . supplies, and why not us? If the Government can ‘not see this, let every individual, who has the welfare of his’ country at heart, do what, in him lies, to promote this good cause; and, as there is nothing in the world that succeeds like success, every pine tree seen flourishing on our prairies, will be a sure incentive to some one to go. and plant another ; and, thus, as the perfectly simple conditions of success begins to be un- derstood, there will be no trouble to induce people to plant evergreens. Let no one be deterred from planting an evergreen’ forest, by the fear, that they will grow too slow. The native piné here, has erown forty feet in twenty- five years; and, with good cultivation, the same variety has grown much ‘faster, even than this ;so that,if the first settlers had planted pine forests, they could now be cutting all ‘the smaller timbers for the large barns which they are building ‘at this time, and, for which, the timber comes long distances by river and rail. In planting a “small trench, should be made as deep as you wish to plant the cutting. Place the cutting in it, draw over it an inch or more of earth, then press firmly with the foot, after which, fill the trench level with mellow e earth, and you have a cutting planted, that will, most surely, grow rapidly. AFTER CARE. _ Having brought our trees through the first season all right, we are apt to congratulate “ourselves that our work is done. On the “contrary, here is just “where many planters suffer shipwreck.’ Now is just the time to make, or mar, the beatuy of our trees, if we wish them to be what ever- greens ought to be, with branches sweeping the ground, in all the lux- uriance of full foliage. In order to attain to this “perfection of form and foliage, it is necessary to keep down every vestige of weeds and grass, while the tree is making its new growth; as the young shoots are then FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 57 very tender, and those in contact with the grass will be smothered. This can best be attained by thorough cultivation, where we have them _in rows. After a tree has attained its annual growth, say about the fourth of July, it will be able to take care of itself; yet, if time can be had, it will be well to keep all grass and weeds away from it always. _ For trees on the lawn, which are not yet large, a good plan is to invert the sod with the spade, to the depth of three or four inches, each spring, _ say in May, six inches to a foot outside the lower limbs. This keeps - the ground mellow, and also, for a time, kills the grass; but this plan will only be allowable in good, rich soil, and will not do at all in sand. Here we must mulch with good, rotten stable manure, and to get the full benefit of it, the operation should be performed every fall, and if too much material should accumulate, scrape away the old before applying _ the new. And this mulching is not understood as it should be., We _..must not pile up little conical heaps of stuff about the stem, but spread _ it out beyond the lower branches, six inches or a foot, quite thickly on the outside, and growing thinner as it approaches the centre, where it is not necessary to have anything, as the foliage itself will keep that part of the earth moist; and thus we have a kind of reservoir, in the middle of which is the tree, and which will retain the moisture which falls on the branches. In this way we keep the soil rich and loose for the small rootlets, which will always be found to extend further out from the trunk than the branches, and of course these must be fed, if we wish the tree to prosper. After lawn trees, in good soil, have grown to large size, say twenty feet and upwards, it is only necessary to attend very carefully to keep- : ing down the grass; mowing once in ten days till the tree has attained its annual growth, which will be, as before stated, about the fourth of July. If the soil is poor and the tree does not seem to do well, a good plan is to mulch heavily with good, rich manure, in the fall, and remove again in the spring, after the rains shall have washed the substance of it into the ground. Neglecting to attend to these things will assuredly, in time, cause the lower branches of most varieties to die out, and thus give us a poor scrubby-looking specimen, only fit for the wood pile. ' Having attended to the foregoing suggestions, which are not mere theories, but have been deduced from actual experiments, no one need fail. Only have faith enough in your work, and in yourself, to go about it as you would any other thing in which you desired to succeed, and ou will not fail; and at the return of spring you will rejoice to see your beautiful trees put forth their delicate young foliage, and continue to do so, year by year, until they shall have attained to such magnificent pro- portions that you will have more pride and gratification in leaving these as a heritage to your children than you will in all the broad and fertile acres which you may have acquired in a long and successful life. Not only will their graceful foliage gladden your eyes and cheer your heart in the spring time, when all nature re-awakes to a renewed actiy- ity, but they will cheer you in the autumn, when all else is in the sear and yellow leaf; and they will be with vou in their shining green all the cold and sombre winter long, to keep away the howling storm and ‘brighten up your now beautiful prairie home, as nothing else in inani- mate nature can: and all the year through, their resinous juices will fill the air about you with health-giving odors, so that, when at length, in the fullness of time, you shall. pass away from earth and your children shall succeed you, and their children, in turn, shall come upon the scene, 58 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. generation after generation shall rise up and call you blessed, for having given them such a beautiful heritage. . Little Valley, Minn., March 1, 1878. JoHNn R. KEPNER. The following unusually instructive and every way valuable paper, from Mr. J. H. Brown, of Lac Qui Parle, Minn., prepared expressly for the Minnesota State Forestry Association, present so many important features in tree planting as to commend it to all who have any interest in “conquering the prairies.” Mr. Brown was one of the early settlers of Northern Illinois—then again an early settler of Olmsted Co., Minn., and ~ again one of the pioneers of civilization on our western borders; a good type of the class of men who cause the wilderness “to blossom as the rose”;—and now in his old age is successfully battling against, and grad- ually overcoming all the privitations and hardships incident to the set- tlement of a new country,—building up a beautiful and attractive home —rearing to himself an arboreal monument, more enduring than mar- ble, and setting an example all may profitably emulate. His young plan- tation so successfully prosecuted, is already the most noticeable feature of the Upper Minnesota Valley, and is: the admiration of every passing traveler. His views in regard to close forest planting, are commended to the consideration of the “carping critics.” ‘The proof of the pudding is in the chewing of thebag-strings:” Lac qui Pare, Dec. 25, 1878. Mr. L. B. Hodges, Dear Sir :— You wrote me that you wished me to write up my experience on for- est tree growing. You said that you wanted it to read at the meeting of the State Forestry Association. I feel thankful to you for the kind in- vitation. I am fearful, however, that you will be dissappointed in con- sequence of expecting more from me than I can give to your asssociation; for you doubtless, have men in your association, who are far more com- petent to instruct in your deliberations than Iam. But since you wish it, I will try to give afew thoughts on the planting and growing of forest trees, on these treeless prairies. In order to make a success in growing trees, we must be thorough in the preparing of the land before the trees are planted, and after they are planted, they need to be well cultivated until they are large enough to take care of themselves, and unless this is done, it is of but little use to think of growing a forest. The land should be prepared and cultivated in the same manner that a thorough farmer prepares and cultivates his land for corn. I have had very good success with trees planted the next spring after the land was broken, but it requires much more labor. It is better to sow the wheat one year, the sod then will be quite well rotted and the trees will grow faster. It is quite useless however, to dwell long on the preparing and culti- vating the land, if a man generally does his farm work well, he will be quite likely to treat his trees thesame way ; and the result will be a grand success, but on the other hand, if the man is in the habit of doing his work slovenly, he will treat his trees in the same way, and the result will be a miserable failure. As regards to the best kinds of timber to plant on these prairies, | think cottonwood the most preferable it grows more rapidly than any other tree; next that is the soft maple. After having planted a liberal amount of these two kinds, I should plant the white ash, which when grown is the most valuable of any variety of timber we have here, and I regard these three varieties the only kinds we have here that is FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 59 worthy of forestry cultivation. But for early, wind-break, orshelter from the wind and early fuel timber, the cottonwood should have the first at- tention. Its timber makes very good fuel, especially when dry. The white willow as a single row, if we wish to grow a live fence is the only tree plant we have here, or get, that will answer that purpose, but I hope to see something better introduced for that purpose. I have, however, planted nearly two miles of it on my farm, and had not the hoppers kept eating it off for the three years it would have made a satisfactory growth, but they kept it back very much, they likewise clipped the outer limbs of the cottonwood, but not as much as the willow. I have used mostly cottonwood in planting my groves, and for the most part I have planted seedlings of one and two years growth; someseasons they are quite plenty here, and some seasons there are but few, which was the case last fall, the seeds fall from the trees from the first of June to July. They fall on the water of the rivers and other places of water, they catch on the shores and sandbars, and grow up the same season four to twelve inches. I have used such plants for the most of my tree planting. But some seasons that class of little trees are quite scarce here, and in that case we resort to cuttings. I have sometimes had very good success with them, and at other times they have been almost a total failure with me. I have heard many men speak of like results, that is when they are pre- pared and stuck in the earth the usual way of doing. I have found by experimenting that cuttings may be prepared and planted in such man- ner that they will be almost sure to grow and do well, at least they have proved a perfect success with me so far as I have tried them. [ _ take the limbs from the tree and: cut them about six inches in length, leaving one small side limb as nearly as may be in the middle of this cutting, cut this back to the length of five or six inches. Plant this cut- ting flat in the ground, say about three inches deep, leaving the end of the side limb two or three inches above ground. It is a matter of no small importance to us to ... know how best to arrange our forest trees, so as: to have them both ornamental and useful. I. |: have here drawn a small plat of a farm, of one |! hundred and sixty acres. I thought, when I ': planted the trees, that they were quite well %: arranged. But, perhaps, some of you can sug- %: gest a better plan. If so, please send us a specimen, and we will be glad to see it. This =! sketeh represents a farm, as it now is; and, I % think, any one who carefully looks at this Craw - bccecccccescsccecet feces! ing, would, if they should chance to pass by this farm, see at once, that it is a fair specimen of the real appearance. You will perceive, that these several belts of trees are in the aggregate, nearly three miles in length. There are, not less than fourteen acres of land in them. The outside row of all the lines of trees is thickly set with willows. These are intended for line fence. On the south and east side, there are only two rows of shade trees planted, as dots indicate. The south-east corner represents house and barn grounds. The open ground a little to the west, contains four acres of land. I have planted nearly all kinds of trees on those grounds. There are public highways on all sides of this farm, save on the north. We think it quite a nice drive around this farm ; the trees standing, for the most part, about six- teen feet high. The forest-belts are planted in rows four feet apart, and G60 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. from two to four foot in the rows. This may seem to some to be quite too close ; but, by so doing they will grow tall and straight with but few side-branches; and in a few years after planting they will admit of being thinned one-half, and those left will be worth more than if planted farther apart at first, and the thinnings will make a large amount of fuel to the acre. If we would grow tall, straight, forest-trees, we must have them quite near together when small. If too far apart, then they will take the form of shade trees. having short trunks and wide-spreading tops, which are not desirable for a valuable forest of tim- ber. ‘l'rees planted twelve feet apart, as some are doing, will never make a valuable forest. And when would we begin to thin it, in consequence of its becoming too close on the ground? I should not look for that time to come in my day; for, when we cut one tree we have a space of twenty-four feet. {If we plant closely, we will have an annual return for our labor a number of years before we would think of cutting a tree, if. we had planted twelve foot apart, and the trees still left, will be of far more value. They will not be mere shade trees, having short trunks. They will be tall, straight trees, useful for any purpose. There is another benefit derived from close planting, for, if well cultivated, in two years they will take care of themselves. But, if planted twelve foot, awe may keep on cultivating, at least five years, and then we have but little value. To grow white ash, I find, by my experience, that it should stand very close while young, if we make a success in growing it on the prairie; and it is best to plant the seeds where you wish them to remain. i think eight inches is far enough apart in the rows. That will cause them to grow tall and slender, with but few side-branches. If left too far-apart, they grow quite scragey. Ihave ash eight foot tall four years after planting seeds. It is better to plant in the fall. Some men in this locality are planting ash-leafed maple in their groves. It grows quite fast, but is rather short lived, and does not grow to a large size ; but, when planted alone, it makes a beautiful shade tree. I have used them quite liberally for that purpose. It is the first tree that looks green in the spring, and is a very ornamental tree. I have none in my forest- planting regarding it, ot less value for that purpose, than most other varieties. We have been very much annoyed in this locality by the hop- pers. ‘They bite nearly everything they light on; they have entirely destroyed very many small trees. I planted a nursery of about ten thousand small cottonwood seedling trees, intending them for transplant- ing. They looked very promising, until late in June, when the hoppers took possession of the ground, destroying all but about fourteen hun- dred. ‘hey also injured the larger trees very much for the last three years. Therefore, their annual growth has been much less than it would have been. But, yet, the growth has been quite satisfactory. I think the cottonwood has made an annual growth of four feet. ‘lhe maples, two vo three feet, and the ash, still less. We had, also, a beetle, or June bug, here last season, which worked on the ash, nearly destroying the entire growth for the season. The young twigs were eaten off and started again three successive times. The bugs leaving about the last of June. They sprouted again, but it was so late that the growth was but little. I have seen the same bug before, but never in such great numbers, and never so destructive. he maple, likewise, has nearly all been cut off when quite small, several years in this locality. Some years they are not touched. Five years ago, I planted quite a large quantity of seeds for a nursery of trees. They came up very nicely, and had about eighty FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 61 thousand of them. When they were nicely above ground, they began to disappear, and in the fall, I had only five or six thousand; I called the destroyer a cut-worm. We all well know that we are lable to meet with disappointments in any enterprise we may engage in ; and, forestry- growing is not an exception tothe general rule. Notwithstanding these disappointments, I have continued to plant a few trees, and the result is quite satisfactory. The theory that forest-trees could not be grown on the open prairie, is now proven to be false; and that of itself, is a long stride towards the treeing of treeless lands. I well remember, that only six years ago this winter, when the wind would be blowing with all its violence, bringing the loose snow from twenty miles west, and northward of us, piling it up in huge drifts around like buildings, and at times, making it unsafe to step out doors I then, at times, being seated around a well-heated stove, talked about planting trees under the protection of which, we could build our houses and barns, and be protected from the wind. Some of my boarders would, at times, jokingly remark, that around this warm stove in a cold, wintry day, was a very good time and place to grow such nice forests ; they not believing that it could be done in our day. Since then, I heard the same persons express thair fullest belief of the sure and early pro- tection from wind and snow, by planting trees.. And such is the case with thousands of men all over the western States. And now, that men have faith in tree-growing, we may look for forests to spring up all over this treeless west. I have observed, that some persons make.a fatal mis- take in planting a grove around their buildings; they plant a few trees quite near their buildings, and think they have done a very good thing. Well, they have, so far as it goes. But, if they gono farther they will, ~ some day, see that itis not so good after all. This small grove will break the wind and stop the snow; but the snow will be stopped and piled up just where they don’t want it. Their door-yards and barn-yards will become filled with snow; or, in other words, they will have no yards visible, and will be quite likely to find themselves wishing that they had not planted any trees. Below, you will see a sketch of ten acres of land, on which is designed to represent ten acres on any homestead-claim in the south-west part of the county. When I planned and arranged the ten acres, as before shown on my farm, at Lac qui Parle, I find that I made in that one mistake, at least. You will observe, that on the north and west sides of this sketch, I have planted three rows of trees, one of willow, and two of cottonwood. This narrow belt will cause the snow to pile up on SETS the south of the north belt, and on the east of the § west belt. The snow always being blown from the north-west in our severe storms. I have then left = within these outcr south lines, several rods in width | of unplanted land. This open space I call the | snow line; and within this snow-line,I have planted | the main grove, designed to protect my building |: grounds. The south-east part not closely planted, | is designed for house, barn, barn-lot, garden, and § i: fruit grounds. A plantation arranged after this soUTH plan will avoid the main grove being piled full of, and broken down by the snow. This ten acre plat may be located on any part of the farm you please to choose. This plat of land is on my homestead claim, . which is located about twenty miles from Lac qui Parle, and nine miles 62 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. north-east of Canby. There are a large number of groves planted in the county. I noticed when passing over some parts of this county last September, one place where I saw, at least, ten of these artificial groves at one view, showing their dark-green lines above the rolling prairie. I hear many talking about planting trees next spring ; and many more will yearly be induced to plant groves, when they see their neighbors trees grow so nicely. And at no distant day, this so-called treeless country will become the pleasant abode of intelligent and civilized man. I wish, here, to take the liberty to correct a mistake, made by some one in regard to the amount of natural forest-timber in the country. I have seen it stated in the reports pertaining to timbered lands in the western part of our State, thatthe county of Lac qui Parle, has only two hundred acres. This is quite far from being correct. Those who best know how much there is, say there are, at least, twenty-two hundred acres. Please correct this report when opportunities present. _ | We shall expect you will use your utmost endeavor to induce Congress to amend the tree-claim act. Bringing down, where the man of small means may avail himself of its benefits, and causing him to grow a closely-set and useful forest, with complete success, instead of an attempt to grow forty acres of shade trees, (for it will be nothing more for a long time,) and make a sad failure, losing his claim, labor, and all. For no poor man can support a family, open up his farm, and grow forty acres of timber at the same time. This class of men are the only men who will undertake to do it; the wealthy are not apt to bind themselves to hold a piece of land eight years, before they can procure title. The pre- mium acts of seventy-one and seventy-three, passed by our State Legis- ‘lature, were very good to encourage growing forest-trees. But the life of those two acts was five years, in which to plant groves to obtain the pre- miums. We here think, that those acts ought to be re-enacted ; and if you think so, we cordially invite you to use your co-operative iufluence to induce our legislature to renew those acts this winter, and have them run indefinitely as to time, when they may be repealed,when they become inoperative. I would suggest, however, that no premiums be awarded for trees planted in the future, unless they are planted so closely together that they will insure a dense forest. We can afford to be taxed for the growing of properly planted and well cultivated forests. But, a forest of trees planted sixteen feet apart, as the other State acts indicated, is too far apart,—“ too thin,” to be worthy of the imposing of taxes on the people of the State for their support. Perhaps, I have not been so particular in my remarks about close plant- ing, as I might have been. I will say a few words more about that part of the work. It is of much importance in planting closely, to have the trees of uniform size, and strength of growth, else the stronger will kill the weaker, before they become large enough to be of value for fuel, or other uses. If we plant a large tree, and then a small, and again a large one, as we are quite likely to do, if we don’t know any better, the larger trees will soon spread their branches over the tops of the smaller trees, which will entirely stop the growing any farther of the smaller trees, and they might about as well be left out. So long as a tree can keep its head up in. the sun, it will continue to reach up still higher. Therefore, it is better that we assort the trees before planting. When we get a large amount of trees ready for planting, they will usually be made up of various sizes. We should assort them in three parts, putting the largest by themselves, and again, the next largest, and lastly, the smallest by FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 63 - themselves. Plant these three divisions as much as may be by them- selves; you will then have planted them so as to cause a uniform growth- -. If we observe these rules in our forestry-planting, we may plant quite closely and every tree will grow large enough to be of value before they will require thinning. I should be happy to meet with you in your de- _ liberations for the errcouraging of forest-tree growing. I have noticed with much pleasure, the success attending your most worthy efforts for the promotion of a cause, which, if properly carried forward, will greatly help to encourage tree-planting in all the treeless portion of our State. And, it must be apparent to all, that the entire State will receive more or less benefit by your efforts. It is highly gratifying to witness what a great change has taken place in the minds of the masses in a few years. Six years ago, 1 one day went to the- timber and got a back-load of sprouts, and brought them up to the house. A little time after, I went in the store, and one of my neighbours asked me what I intended doing with those brush he saw me carrying. I told him I was going to cut them in pieces and stick them in the ground, and grow me a forest of timber for fuel, and other purposes. He,not believing that these brush would grow to trees of value and usefulness in our day, in quite a solemn manner, remarked, that some of us would need a wooden jacket before we could grow trees large enough to do us any good. Neither him nor I have yet needed a wooden jacket. I have some splendid trees from the brush, but he has not commenced planting yet. He told me last week that if he could have believed that the trees could be made to grow as mine had, he would have had a grove likewise. This man was not alone in his unbelief. To-day, men do not believe that forests can be grown, and thousands will act according to their faith in the good work. The time is not far in the future, when I believe this county will be all dotted over with groves of forest trees. Before I close, I again invite you to use your utmost influence in be- half of the tree-claim-act, the State premium acts, and any and every thing you can for the benefit of the treeless portion. We are wofully poor, financially. The grasshoppers, for three years past, have used us without mercy, and we greatly need the almighty dollar. But, I must close, hoping this will do you no harm, if it should do you no good. This:is from an obscure and humble frontiersman. J. H. BROWN. The Beech—Fagus Sylvatica. In all;my rambles over Minnesota I have never yet encountered a reg- ular old fashioned. beech tree—such as are common east of Lake Michi- gan. The water beech is indigenous and common along the river bot- toms of Minnesota, but of too little value to talk much about. There is a tradition of a large beech tree standing, or formerly standing, some- where near the banks of the Mississippi between Hastings and Red Wing, that the Indians held in great reverence, and performed many a sacred “ pow-wow” under its umbrageous shade. Whoever succeeds in growing a beech forest in Minnesota, will have, certainly, the poor consolation of knowing that his life has not been al- together a failure. It is more than probable that his name would be honorably enrolled high up in the annals of forestry. I would not view the attempt to grow a beech forest in Minnesota as Utopian in any sense. Our climate and soil are both good enough, and I do not yet see any insurmountable obstacles to overcome. 64 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. It is true that the attempts in this direction so far, are not encouraging, “but if at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.” Try it on after your young forests have so far developed as to afford a good shade to the young plant. Plant the beechnuts soon after they have dropped, and - while yet perfectly fresh and sweet, and cover lightly. | There is no use in planting eastern grown beech trees on the open. prairie; I do not say they will all die within six months, but Ido say the - blazing sun and drying winds make it mighty tough for them. They. need the. protection a partially developed forest would naturally give, and. with such protection success is possible. - sapeeer Bryant says: “The beech is one of the loftiest trees of the American. forests, sometimes reaching the height of one hundred feet. It occupies - a wide range of latitude, being found from Canada to the Gulf of Mex- ico. It is a stranger to the prairies of Illinois and Iowa. It grows to the greatest size in deep, moist soils. * * * The roots of the beech run near the surface of the soil, and often appear above it. If the trees are felled in winter, they send up a great number of sprouts, so that a beech forest is easily renewed. *,-* .* .* "Whe jbeech, camm@imne recommended as one of the most profitable trees for forest culture, nevertheless, it is worthy the attention of those who plant ona large scale. From Hough’s report, page 72, we find the following, which I deem useful in this connection: The Brrcu (Fagus sylvatica) is the only hard wood by nature admirably suited for growth in unmixed forests. Its leaves, rich in potash, decay easily, and form an excellent humus. In high-timber forests, it finds its proper place, growing best where the foliage forms an almost unbroken roof, which hinders the sun from drying the soil. Its period is usually 100 to 120 years, being longer on poor soils. It is not suited for coppice, because its power of sending up shoots from. the stool is not great, and their growth is slow; but in lime sois this power is greater. It occurs as coppice under standards where the latter throw much shade on the underwood, or where, as in the case of oak standards, the ground should be well shaded from the sun. On lime, and the milder clay ‘soils, it thrives as standards, but it then overshadows more than any other tree. Its wood is usually worth less than other hard woods in the market. The beech requires a strong min- eral soil, fresh and rich in humus. It is often found with the oak on sandy, loamy deposits, if not too dry or too moist; but on poorer and lighter soils, or in exposed places, it grows slowly, and the soil becomes impoverished. The true home of the beech is on lime, basalt, and greenstone, if the soil is not too thin. This par- tiality for lime is shown in the smoothness of bark, the straightness of trunks, and their freedom from branches; the annual erowth is great, and reproduction by natural means easy. In fresh, sheltered places on lime, the beech bears seeds early, (beginning about the seventeenth or nineteenth year), and continues todo . so at intervals of three to five years, and in abundance. : The Cuestnut, (Castenea).—I do not propose to recommend this tree for the prairie. More than twenty years of unsuccessful experimenting have proved its unfitness. During a succession of unusually mild win- ters it has escaped severe injury, but when we get 40° below zero, good- bye to him! I am inclined to think the soil of our prairies is not just the thing for the chestnut, for 40° below zero among the mountains of northern New York, don’t hurt it, Iam informed that among the tim- bered blufts, ravines and gulches of Allemakee Co., lowa, and Houston’ Co., Minnesota, it has proved a success. In such localities I would try it on a small scale, but never out on the open prairie. Sorr Marte, (Acer dasycarpum).—Not a bad tree for the prairie; nor as good as many of its friends claim. Closely planted in groves, it is well worth cultivating. It is a rapid grower, generally healthy and hardy. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 65 Found in its native state on nearly all the river bottoms. Well culti- vated, it produces a large amount of very good fuel in a very few years. It pays well to manure this tree. For isolated shade trees, although very beautiful, they are not to be depended on, as they are pretty sure to split down, from the pressure of strong winds about the time you begin to think you have something to be proud of. Notwithstanding this serious objection, lots of fellows will keep right on, all the same, transplanting them from the river bot- toms to their door-yards To all such let me say, don’t cut the tops off. If necessary to trim up to bare poles, do so, but always leave the leader as nature made it. By so doing your tree is not half so liable to split down. The young nursery trees should be kept well trimmed, the lat- eral branches never to be allowed to get any start. The seed ripens in Minnesota last of May or first of June. Should be picked from the tree as soon as the seeds begin to fall, and should be. sown as soon thereafter as possible. The sooner the better. On clean, new ground I have seen them do remarkably well, sown broadcast and very thick. ‘They are usually planted in drills and covered about one inch deep; should the ground be dry, rollit or trampitdown. The seed will sprout and the plants will appear about as quick as corn. When the young plants first show themselves, shade thoroughly, or the sun will be pretty sure to burnthem off. Then cultivate frequently till harvest time and they will grow from 8 to 18 inches the first season, and are suitable for trans- planting the next spring. BOX ELDER, ASH-LEAVED MAPLE.—(Acer negunda). A good tree for the prairie; “in favorable situations, becomes a stately tree, reaching the hight of 50 or 60 feet.” Itis very hardy, growing as far north as 54°. The finest specimens of this tree I have yet seen, areto be found in the valley of the Red River of the North. In rich, moist soil, its growth is surprisingly rapid, discounting the soft maple two to one. In very dry soil it is short lived ; it yields a wonderful flow of sap, from which sugar can be made. The quality of the wood is similar to the soft maple. ~. As an ornamental tree, its dense, beautiful green foilage, (and if it has room to spread itself) its round, symetrical top renders it an object of ad- miration: The seed ripens in the fall and should be sown soon after. I have carried them over till the next spring and then sown, but have al- ways had better results from fall sowing; cover the seed lightly and with frequent and clean culture, you soon get lots of good trees. I believe I have now briefly touched upon all, or nearly all the desir- able forest trees for our Minnesota prairies. It is not the object, nor is it within the scope of this little work to treat upon all the forest trees of America. To such persons as may be disappointed in not finding in this work a greater range of information, I would respectfully recommend to their persual the works of Bryant, Gray, Warder, Fuller, Michaux, Eve- _ lyn, Berenger, Burgsdorf, Brown, and other eminent authorities. I shall now proceed to gather and arrange such items of practical value and in- terest, as may seem calculated to promote forestry in Minnesota. Prof. William H. Brewer, of Yale College, in an article published in Walker’s Statistical Atlas, estimates the number of species of woody plants in the United States at 800. Of these, upward of 300 indigenous species attain the height of 30 feet, of which 251 are abundant somewhere, or at least, not rare. In this he 66 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. excluded all smaller trees that never attain a height of 50 feet, and the tropical species found on the extreme southern border. Of large trees somewhat abun- dant, hee stimates 120 species, of which 20 grow 100 feet; twelve, 200, and perhaps five or six 300 feet in height, or upward. Of these 120, about fifty belong to the conifer. Only a very few species occur across the whole country, from the At- lantic to the Pacific. Of these, the aspen (Populus tremuloides) and some of the cottonwoods are mentioned; but as a rule, there isa marked contrast be- tween the forest regions east and west of the treeless belt, the timber of the Rocky Mountains belonging to the western rather than the eastern type. New England, originally all wooded, has 80 to 85 species, of which about 60 grow to a height of 50 feet. The Middle States, also originally wooded, have 100 to 105 species, of which 65 to 67 sometimes reach a height of 50 feet. The southeastern part, also entirely wooded, has over 130 species, 75 of which grow 50 feet or more, and per- haps a dozen, 100 feet. The southwestern region was characterized by dense for- ests and open plains, and numbers 112 to 118 species, of which 60 to 75 grew to 50 feet. The northwestern region is diversified by prairies, “openings,” forest, (some of great extent and density), and timber belts along the rivers and streams. It contains 105 to 110 species, about 68 to 70 of which grow to 50 feet. Professor Newberry, in his Geological Survey of Ohio (i. 529), notices several instances of this relation between rock formations and timber growth. The Cuyahoga shales, rich in potash, bear a growth of large elms, scattered over this plateau as far as the eye can reach; beech and maples, with thick groves of chest- nut where the broken rock comes near the surface, mark the horizon of the con- glomerate, and above this a belt of forests, in which the predominate timber is oak, defines with great accuracy the limits of the coal-measures in the northern part of Ohio. The redwood of California is limited to a peculiar sandstone forma- tion, and the noble red cedars of Tennessee to the Glade Limestone, a subdivision of the Trenton Group, which extends superficially as a very irregular ring across the central part of the State. On subsequent pages we shall have frequent occa- sion to notice this dependence of forest growth upon the underlying geological formations, including, of course, the soils resulting from their decomposition. These peculiarities, when understood, afford valuable indications that may be followed with profit in attempting the cultivation of timber trees. SOWING AND PLANTING. BY DR. HOUGH. We shall endeavor to present in the following pages, such practical statement of methods and results of experience as appeared best calcu- lated to afford subjects of thought and suggestions for experiment in tree-planting. The results obtained in one country may be different from those in another, but due allowance being made for circumstances, the principles of vegetable growth are everywhere alike, and a careful result of experience and observation acquire a permanent value. SHOULD WE SOW OR PLANT ?—EXPERIENCE OF EUROPEAN FORESTERS.* Most foresters nowadays resort to planting in preference to sowing in beginning new forests. Is this a fashion and mere caprice, or is it the fruit of experience and observation? This question we will proceed to examine. Let us go back a hundred years or more. In 1756, the most distinguished German forester of that period, Johann Gottlieb Beck- mann, published a work entitled Experiments and Experiences upon the necessity of sowing Forest Trees. In this work he specified the method of sowmg as alone capable of yielding good results, and as the proper means for regenerating a ruined forest. “What shall be said of the =46 Translated from an artlcle by the Baron Manteuffel, grand master of Forestsin Saxony. ‘“‘AKevue Des Euux et Forets,? 1, 147. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 67 method of planting?” he asks; and to this the reply is short and deci- sive, “It is not a good way, and as to resinous species, it is impracti- cable.”* Had foresters been satisfied with this positive declaration, there would have been no question as to planting within the iast hundred years, but this has not happened, and they have been compelled to have recourse to planting oftener than they wished, perhaps as they regarded it, to complete and replace their sowing. They were led to observe that the ancient process of planting left much to be desired, and that it was susceptible of great improvement, while, on the other hand, they found many soils to be covered in which sowing afforded but slender chance of success. Little by little they gave more attention to the system of planting, and had oftener recourse to this method, so that fifty years after the publication of Beckmann’s book, to-wit, 1805, Buresdorf thus expressed himself in his Treatise upon Forests, in the chapter upon forest plantations: “Besides the kinds above mentioned that may be planted on a large scale, it is a principle that others may be planted, but only on a small scale; in all cases depending upon success only where _ the conditions are favorable.” He seems to have understood these “ cer- tain rules,” and “favorable conditions,” and explained them; but in this it was a sad thing for sylviculture, they tainted the precepts of the master. It would require much time to do full justice to the system of planta- tion, and in proof of this the elder Cotta, some twenty-five years ago, remarked: “As the establishment of forest growths on a large scale is easier to do by sowing than by planting, &.,.* * * we deem it con- venient to give preference to the former of these methods.” An exam- ination of the modifications wrought both in theory and in practice since these principles were laid down would lead us much too far, and, in our day, progress is more rapid, and science travels further in twenty years than formerly in acentury. We will only remark, that the old rule which prescribed that we should plant only where there is no chance of success by sowing, has now in many countries, and especially in Saxony, given place to this, never to sow except where it is impossible to plant.f In other words, planting is now the rule—sowing, the exception; just the reverse of what it formerly was. Experience has, in fact, demonstrated to the present generation of sylviculturists that generally a forest growth can be established sooner, more swrely, and in better condition, by planting ; sooner, because it starts at least two years earlier than one that 1s sown, and, furthermore, four or five years often elapse before it is pos- itively known whether a sowing is to be repaired or completed, while in plantations the very next year will show every plant that is unable to survive, and these can be at once replaced:—more surely and in better condition, because plantations are exposed to fewer casualties than seed- ling growths. The success of the latter depends in the first instance, upon the quality of the seeds. Now, as we are seldom so situated that we can harvest them ourselves, we must take them as offered in the mar- ket, at which are too often sold seeds gathered before they are ripe, or that are withered, or badly kept, or heated, or too old. But assuming the most favorable conditions, let us suppose that all the seeds we get *Chapter iv, ? 13.’” ; Messrs. Lorentz & Parade remark: ‘Sowing is considered by many foresters as principally applicable to anes operations, because its processes are more natural and simple, as well as cheaper than those of planting. But practice tends every day to establish the superiority of the latter.” (Cours Elementaire de Culture des Bois, 4th ed., p. 509.) 68 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. are good, we still have cause to fear that the soil is not well prepared, the sowing not even, that the seed are covered too little or too much, or that too violent showers or persistent drought, too burning a sun, or.a late frost may happen to destroy all our hopes; but we will further sup- pose that the season has been as favorable for the coming up of the seeds as we could desire, and that the birds and the mice have scrupu- lously respected the tender plants, we shall be very much deceived if we _ suppose that everything is now secure; but in fact, if the conditions have been propitious for the growth of forest seeds, they have been equally so for the growth of pernicious weeds; so much so indeed, that we can scarcely find the little germs in the midst of the grass and herb- age by which they are covered and stifled. We may sometimes pull up these weeds, but at the risk of drawing up the young plants, but this does not always happen, and in this case the mice often find among the dried weeds under the snow, a refuge, the more attractive because it offers a shelter from the cold, and young plants at hand for food. When the spring comes to melt the snow, there is more sowing to be done, for _ everything is eaten up. If we succeed in keeping a sowing clean of weeds the first year, we have every reason to apprehend that in the next spring following we shall find the ground spread over with young plants that have been thrown out by the frost. Many other dangers await the seedling forest during the following years, but it would be needless to enumerate them. We have said enough to show that success in sowing is uncertain. Plantations are likewise liable to late frosts, the teeth of mice, and of various other accidents, but their existence is not endangered. In most cases these troubles do not occur after two or three, or at most, four years. The only real enemies to plantations are insects and their larve, and it is not surprising that foresters now give preference to this system. Plantations become cheaper than seeding. Experienced foresters do not need facts to convince them upon this point. They know, in fact, that if the cost of first establishment is a little less in sowing than in plant- ing, especially if seeds are cheap, the expenses occasioned in caring for the work and of replanting gaps and vacant places is much greater for seeding, so that taking everything into account, the advantage is al- together on the side of planting. Be it far from us, however, to think that we should never have recourse to direct seeding. In sylviculture there are no absolute and universal rules. Thus, for example, we would never advise planting timber on the light sands of La Manche or Basse- Lusace, as we would always blame sowing on the strong-sodded but thin soils of Saxony. All we have to say as to this is, that as a general rule, and except in certain well-defined cases, such as those above men- tioned, planting should be the rule; sowing the exception. THE CONDITIONS MOST FAVORABLE FOR GROWING OF FOREST- SEEDS. That seeds may germinate, they must have a certain amount of con- tact with the air, and a proper degree of warmth and moisture. In the natural process of seeding but a very small number of the seeds so bountifully produced ever find these due proportions of congenial influ- ences, so as to take root and grow. It is only here and there that a seed gets lodged among the dead leaves and the mosses, or gets covered by the detritus, so as to secure the needed protection and a successful FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 69 growth. Ifseeds are left too lightly covered they may be eaten by birds, or washed out by rains. If too deep, the young shoot will be entirely smothered, or will come slowly to the surface in too feeble condition for vigorous growth. With the view of determining fixed rules from careful trial, a series of observations was made by Dr. Baur, director of the experimental sta- tion for forestral researches at Hohenheim, in Wurtemberg, in 1873, 1874 and 1875, the principal results of which are given in the Revue des Eaux et Forets for June, 1876. The soil selected tor these experiments was of average density. We can only state the general results: Beech:—Seeds should be but slightly covered. The best results were found when the covering was from 0.39 to 1.57 inches, and the best depth 0.79. This agrees quite nearly with the rule laid down by Burckhard, Heyer, and Lorentz and Parade. Quercus pedunculata.—The acorns should be planted shallow, but a little deeper - than beech-nuts. The depth should be more in light soils. Heyer recommends 1 to 2 inches, and advises that they be sometimes covered by a plow. Acer cumpestre (English Maple).—The seeds should be but slightly covered, but little deeper than with beech. From 0.39 to 0.78 is unquestionably best, and beyond 2.75 inches they will not grow. The observer noticed the following appearances in the germination of the maple: They issue with very long cotyle- dons, and if deeply covered, or if the surface of the soil is too hard, these cannot easily break through the obstacle, yet continue to grow, and at length break, and thus the germ is lost We may thus see why many vacant places often occur in seed-beds of the maple. Acacia.—The results here observed were quite interesting, and agreed perfectly in the two years observed. When Stumpf ( Waldbau, 2d ed:, p. 276) laid down the general rule that “large and heavy seeds should be more deeply covered,” he should have excepted this kind. The results tend to show that depth has but very little influence, but that these seeds, however light, should be planted at least as deep as acorns. The result appears to lead to the conclusion that the acacia might be used with advantage in planting arid soils and southern slopes, where seeds thinly covered would scarely grow trom want of moisture. Black Alder.—This should be but very slightly covered, a third of an inch being enough. Burckhard avises that it should be very slighlty covered, or even simply strewn upon the surface, and Heyer remarks that it should be mingled with the most superficial parts of the soil. The experiments of Dr, Baur gave the best results at 0.39 inch. From 0.59 to 0.98 the shoots were but few, and from greater depths but one seed came up. ; Cammon pine.—The results of two years showed that a covering of 0.39 to 0.59 inch is the most advantageous. At greater depths the plants were scattered, and none grew from a depth of over 1.18 inches. Fir.—With this, as with the pine, the deeper seeds were slower in coming to the surface, and the general average for best results was the same. Silver Fir.—The best depth ranges between 0.39 and 0.77 inch, or a little more than in the case of the pine and fir. None appeared which had been covered 1.18 or more inches. ATTENTION TO THE QUALITIES OF SEEDS—GATHERING OF SEEDS. It is a universal law in nature, that certain qualities of excellence or defect, tend to transmission from parent to offspring. By virtue of this, the various choice breeds of domestic animals have been originated and improved. Our plants cultivated forculinary use, and ornamental plant- ing, have thus been multiplied in variety without number, and in qual- ity so greatly improved upon the native original, as scarcely to be recon- ized as of the same species. : May we not from an analogy hope an equally good result in the growth and quality of timber, and of the fruits and other products of forest-trees? 70 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. Herein, although we have the disadvantage of a slow growth, and a life that often outlives a man ’s, we have the decided advantage of being able to hold and keep what we ‘eet, by the processes of budding and grafting, as we constantly see in our nurseries of ornamental trees, where striking peculiarities, often originating in nature, or from some accidental circum- stance, are perpetuated and multiplied without limit. But. starting with the seed, itis obviously of first importance that it be of the best quality 3—not the first that falls, because as in fruits, it may have ripened prematurely from injuries done by insects ;—not from stint- ed and dwarfish trees, which sometimes bear seed in morbid excess, nor from trees enfeebled by extreme age or other debilitating causes. __ It is laid down as a rule worthy of close observance, that the trees from which the best seed are to be expected should be middle-aged, that grow _isolated, or. at least a little separate from others, so as to have the full benefit of the air and light—that the tree have a full head, and a perfect- ly healthy and vigorous condition. Wood that is aged and decaying, as well as that which is young and tender, is apt to yield seed that will not grow, or at least that will pro- duce dwarfish and worthless shoots. Scrubby and malformed trees, are said, on high authority, to tend to the production of degenerate varieties, from which they will not recover to the primitive type, until they have been cultivated under better con- ditions, and through several generations. Seeds should be gathered when the weather is dry, and such as are heavy, when they fall to the ground, as when beaten or shaken from the trees they sometimes fall before fully ripe. When gathered, they should be spread in thin layers in a dry airy place, at least until the dampness is evaporated. The mode of preservation differs greatly with the species and the tendency to sprout, to rot, to heat, to perish by desiccation, or to mold, is to be counteracted according to circumstances. In some cases it is important to keep seeds from fluctuations of temperature by burying in dry sand, or covering them with litter or straw. In others itis advis- able to keep them cool and slightly damp, as by placing them in a cellar. The soft maples (Acer dasycarpum or silver maple, A. rubwm or red maple) mature their fruit in June, and their seeds should be planted at once. The sugar, Norway, sycamore, and some other maples, ripen their seeds in the fall, and they may be sown then, or be kept in a box, mixed with sand, until the following spring. Acorns, walnuts, chestnuts, &c., should be planted as soon as they fall, to insure success ; but as they are liable to destruction by squirrels and other small animals, it may be often convenient to keep them in boxes covered with sand in a cool place to prevent too much drying, theo the winter, and then plant in the spring. METHODS OF PRESERVING AND OF PLANTING SEEDS. Elm-seeds ripen in June, andif they find congenial soil and conditions, will make good growth the first season. Red-cedar berries should be bruised early in March, and mixed. with an equal or greater bulk of wet wood-ashes. In three weeks the alkali will have cut the resinous gum, when the seeds can be washed clean from the pulp. In preparing * the seed- beds, dig the ground a foot or more in depth, mix for three or four inches at the surface a liberal dress- ing of well-rotted leaf-mold (or wood-soil) and sharp sand: Lay off the FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. Tal beds four feet wide, and sow, screen, and cultivate as elsewhere described for other evergreens. They may be watered occasionally in the evening ‘in ease of drought. The shading should be removed and a mulching of leaves two inches deep put along the rows. They may be transplanted to nursery rows the second spring, and three years after the alternate rows should be taken out.* ECONOMICAL MODE OF PRESERVING ACORNS IN LARGE QUANTI- TIES THROUGH THE WINTER.—METHOD PRACTICED IN FRANCE. Acorns when kept over winter in large quantities, are liable to various accidents that injure or destroy their germinating power. They may become too dry; in large heaps they will heat and mold; or, if too wet, they will sprout sooner than is desired. To obviate these dangers, the following cheap mode of keeping them in large quantities has been men- tioned as practiced in France, which might be equally adapted to the middle latitudes of our own country, with such modifications due to greater dryness of climate as experience would suggest: ~ A place is selected in a forest where the soil is sandy and dry, the sur- face level, or slightly inclined to the south, and the shelter of large trees low and abundant. It should be fenced in, and if liable to the drainage of water from adjacent grounds, a small ditch may be dug around it. The acorns are spread on the ground as gathered, but nowhere more than four or five inches deep, the leaves and litter being first removed. From the beginning, they should be raked an hour or two daily, with great regularity, during the first month, and after that a raking once in two or three days will be sufficient. By the end of December their tendency to heat will be over, and during very cold weather they should be lightly covered with leaves or ferns; but these should be taken off early to pre- vent sprouting. In temperate climates, no covering is needed but the shelter of the trees. In very rainy winters, the raking may be renewed from time to time, and continued till time for planting. TREE-SEEDS—METHODS OF PLANTING. In a report of a committee upon forestry, made to the lowa State Hor- ticultural Society in 1875 (p. 298), by Prof. Henry H. McAfee, the fol- lowing practical statements are made upon this subject: Seeds may be classified for purposes of treatment into three sorts, viz, nuts, hard seeds, and soft seeds. The nuts should always be planted where they are to re- main permanently, as the nut-trees do not usually transplant without considerable injury, and the nuts must be kept damp from the time when they are ripe till planted ; at least the kernal must not be allowed to become dry, or they will sure - ly fail to grow. Thin soft-shelled nuts, like the chestnut, will, if exposed to sun and air,dry in a few hours enough to prevent growth. So nuts must be kept in earth, or on the earth under mulch, or in something that will prevent drying till used. Peat, moss, old straw, dust, &c., will do. A very good way is to spread them in a thin layer upon the ground, or in a trench so located that water cannot stand among them, and cover them thoroughly with mulch, planting them at corn- planting time, and about as deep as corn is planted. *S. Edwards, of Lamoile, Ill., in Transactions of Wisconsin Agricultural Society,’ 1858-1859, p. 506. In this article, preference is given to the red cedar in Illinois before any other evergreen for ordinary screens of moderate hight. For screens to orchards, buildings, and stock-yards, the Norway spruce would do better. Mr. Edwards has tried and rejected as not hardy, the cedar of Lebanon, Deodar cedar, Mount Atlas cedar, Douglas spruce, Menzies spruce, Araucarian pine, English and Irish yews, Chinese arbor-vitae, and golden-leaved yew. The sea-pine and European silver-fir were not sufficient- ly hardy unless protected in winter. : Te FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. The hard seeds are generally somewhat slow to germinate, and need to be in soak a long time, to be frozen wet, or to be scalded hefore planting, or to betreated with some substance to hasten germination. This class embraces honey-locust, which, if kept dry and planted in spring, will seldom ever grow the first year, and sometimes will not sprout till the third season ; also the stones of cherries and plums, and even the seeds of apples and pears. Ifmixed with sand (two parts of sand to one of seed by bulk) and dampened fully, and subjected to moderate freezing through the winter, all this class except honey-locust, coffee-nut, the haw- thorns, and red cedar are likely to grow the season planted. For these exception- ally hard cases water, heated to boiling, is poured over them, and, standing upon them an hour or two, some may swell, and can then be picked out and planted, and the more incorrigible treated to another scald, and thus till they all swell, or they are planted in fall and left to grow when they will; or, in case of the haws, they may be mixed into bran-mash and fed to sheep or cattle, and the droppings planted, when the seeds, softened by the digestion, are likely to grow. : The soft seeds, comprising all not named in the two other classes, may be still further divided into spring, fall, and winter seeds, each of which requires or per- mits different treatment. The spring seeds are those which ripen in spring or early summer, as silver and red maples and red and white elm, all ripening from May 15 to June 5,* and the rock elm a little later than the others. These seeds will not keep well, and should be gathered from the trees before they fall, except where they are so situated that they may fall into still water, when, being light and floating, they may sometimes be scooped up in large quantities. As soon as possible after gathering they should be planted, not covered deeply, say one-half inch, in good mellow soil, and if a fine mulch, like damp chaff, can be obtained, it should be lightly spread over the ground to protect from too rapid drying of the ground, which sometimes takes place in June. The winter soft seeds are ash-leaved maple, green and black ash, syeamore, bass- wood, &c., or those seeds which have a tendency to hang all winter in sheltered localities. These seeds may be gathered sometimes as late as planting-time and immediately planted ; but if gathered earlier, had better be spread thinly upon the ground and covered till planting-time. All others of the soft or winged seeds, not classed as spring or winter, are the soft fall seeds, and they should all be stored as directed for the nuts. Hackberry and cherry, though properly classed with the hard seeds, should be freed from their pulp in fall and stored in earth to freeze, and planted in spring without scalding. All seeds, but nuts which are large enough to pick up readily, and such as may be gathered floating on still water, as noted above, are best gathered from the trees, and stored soasnotto dry too much. They must not be kept in too large masses, as, so dealt with, they may heat and Sool, we er es (ete If ground is not very weedy, it may be economy to plant all seeds in permanent plantation ; but in old or weedy ground it is generally best to grow them in seed- bed or nursery rows. If put in the permanent plantation, allowance should be made for poor seeds, and more planted than you want of trees. The question of check-row or drill-planting is to be decided by the planter, and the same reasons which determine the manner of planting corn have weight in forestry ; though generally speaking, forestry is more satisfactory in drills than is an annual crop like corn. If check-rows are used, several seeds per hill are desirable ; and if drills, generally twice or three times as many seeds as you need trees should go in. It is not worth while to put tree-seeds into any but mellow, moist soil, and to secure good results with them, thorough culture the first year is necessary. A rule of depth sometimes given is to cover with soil as deep as the seed is thick, and that is of course very thin for small seeds. But seeds of trees often get covered too deep, and any seeds but the nuts ought to grow with half an inch of fine earth ny packed above the seed. Nuts may be planted a little deeper, but not very much. Seed-beds and nursery rows are, all in all, to be advised, and they are generally used for seedling trees. Seed-beds are usually four feet wide and of any conven- ient length, and four inches above the surrounding level. For evergreen and larch seeds, which, by the way, ought not to be attempted by any one not trained* in the nursery business, shades are used in the form of lath hurdles, with open- ings of less width than the strips, and generally in addition to the hurdles, wind- *These dates, and in fact the whole article, will be considered as applying to Iowa and adjaeent partsin the Western prairie country. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 73 screens around the beds, while some nurserymen build arbors over their seed- beds, and such seed is generally put in broadcast, covering by sifting on sandy earth. But for any of our native tree-seeds, shading will hardly be necessary. “* * * * * * * * * * * Drills across the beds one foot apart may: be planted, or drills twenty to twenty- eight inches apart may be made of any length, and on the general level, and the seeds planted at the rate of twenty to forty to the foot. Culture while plants are young should be by hand, running a hand wheel-hoe, and hand-weeding in the drill, if necessary ; but when the trees have attained some growth, a steady horse may be used, and if the nursery is made of long rows, of course horse labor 1s bet- ter employed than if it is in short rows. Most of the native trees will be fit at one year old to remove to permanent plantation, and if to be so used, should be dug in the fall, and stored by burying, or in cellar, ready for early planting the next spring. The writer mentions two systems of planting—the furrow and spade, _ giving preference to the latter, in any but a very dampspring. For this a heading spade (a sort with a long blade ending in an obtuse angle) is used to best advantage. The spade is pushed half-way down ; the handle borne a foot back, and then it is pushed down the whole length, when it: is again brought upright. This makes a hole proper for receiving th _ (roots of the tree, and when set the earth is pressed down. . As for distance apart, 4 by 4 feet is generally preferable, which requires 2,722 txees per acre. Spaces 3 by 3 are as near as can be cultivated by horse-power, giving 4,840 trees per acre. The writer prefers 32 by 332, and has found that yellow cottonwood at this will cover the ground the first year. In planting trees, the earth should not be wet, so as to make a mortar ; neither should they be set while there is standing water in the hole. In such cases the soil in contact with the roots tends to become hard in dry- ing, to the great injury of the growth. The clay that may adhere and dry on, where the roots have been puddled in transplanting, should be rinsed off before the trees are set. The necessity of pressing the earth firmly around the roots appears to be greater in the fine prairie soil of the West then where it is of a coarser texture. At least, it appears to be the concurrent testimony of planters on the prairies that the soil should be strongly compressed, leaving, however, the surface loose, so as to read- ily absorb the rains. A clay soil would be apt.to bake if pressed. This tendency to bake is greater when planting is done in a wet time. SHELTER TO YOUNG SHOOTS IN NURSERIES. When the young trees begins life in its native conditions, it is sheltered by the parent boughs. When we seek to producethesame kinds, in nur- series, it # in reason that we should not expose them to the direct rays of ahot sun. The careful forester will protect the tender shoots by branches of trees, lightly spread over the ground, and for this the decid- uous kinds are better than evergreens, because the latter afford less shade, and sooner shed their leaves. When this shelter is removed, it should be done little by little, to accustom the plants gradually to the open air. NUMBER OF TREES TO THE ACRE. Systematic treatises upon planting, give tables showing the number of trees of different species that should be allowed to remain on the ground at different ages of growth. But so many circumstances of soil, aspect, 74 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. and climate effect these, that the experience of one locality can scarcely be allowed to establish rules for another. In fact, this must be leftto the skill and intelligence of the planter, who should carefully observe the wants of the case and afford the relief from overcrowding that the case demands. It has been stated, as a general rule, that full half of the trees first planted at 4 feet apart should be removed before the growth is 20 feet high ; the number should not exceed 800 to the acre, when 30 feet high ; and when 40 feet, not over 300 to 350 to the acre, the soil and exposure being the most favorable that are found. Others reckon the space between at one-fifth of the height. Some idea of the capacity of soil for tree-growth, under the best man- agement in Europe, may be formed from the statement that an acre of — ash, elm, or sycamore 40 years old will contain 2,000 or 3,000 cubic feet of timber, and when 60 years old double this amount. This is, besides the successive thinnings, which become, when near a market, an impor- tant source of income, and when the growth beeomes large, may be more in value than the cost of management and interest of investment. These thinnings should be continued as long as neccessary, and in full- grown forests may sometimes be required in forests 80 years old. Asa general rule, larch, spruce, and other conifers require less space than broad-leaved deciduous trees. Larch is supposed to do well in good soil, with 9 feet space around it. - ; It is also observed that certain trees bear the shade of other species better than that of their own, and that, therefore, a mixture, as for instance, of oak and beech, will grow nearer together than either species would if alone.. ; The following table shows the number of trees upon an acre, at the distance specified, and the number that might be left at different ages, with the proportional value of the thinning, taken at these several periods: = Sku Fy 2 a asad a 3 = Sy ee @ 2. S Sogs Age (years). E s $ Mac g5 i = 2a 35 obese a & a Pa Ft. In. Per cent. UES AAD DAS AMEN Gly siyaey emit ne a0 Ge Commit babe Wi owed 3,097 358 3. DE stoi io ofan ore Bis ato ce oe EES Pk at a Re a 40 2,792 375 5.2 1 AS Seb te area a SN TAK pei SMD 4 C3 SrA cis 43 2,411 311 6.5 OT shaletnia Grate a cee tararsl 2A CITED SPAY OP AE CRE Oa LT ay f 2,073 338 10.5 BD ss chat Se sere seb, ace a 2 a cen ae Rie rail ae aes 5 6 1,440 | 833 23.6 Ao alata nets ei ciace rece atens Se eT ue ME Ds Ua i a 6 6 1,031 409 23.7 DEES Baie clelcteia tacts SETA AG a eee PAE A aceey Man 8 0 680 291 27.5 The amount of timber grown on a given area, in some of the govern- mental forests of Europe that have been planted and managed accord- ing to the rules of forestal science, is very much greater than the same soil would grow in wood if left to itself. “So striking is the difference, that Dr. Berenger, who is at the head of the Italian school at Vallom- brosa, remarks, in the Journal of Forestal Economy (Giornalle di Econ- omia Forestale) 1871-72: That while an uncultivated woodland taken for a long period, and counting interest and taxes, would yield almost nothing to the capital invested, it is well- established that the same land, managed according to modern science, would, in the long run, yield a revenue both conspicuous and constant. ‘ FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 75 PLANTATION OF DIFFERENT SPECIES. Without attempting to discuss the artistic effects which become a study in landscape gardening and the laying out of parks, we will con- cisely state some suggestions that have been made as worthy of atten- tion by those who wish to apply them. By placing a plat of white pine in the centre, and surrounding it by successive belts of Norway spruce, Scotch pine, Austrian pine, white cedar, and red cedar, the group planted on level ground, when fully grown would appear highest in the middle, as if standing upon a mound. A belt of cottonwood around the margin would afford shelter while needed, and should be cut away when fully established. Orchard belts of Scotch pine, white pine, Norway spruce, and larch, have been recommended, and the use of screens on the north and west sides have been mentioned as desirable But from observation and inquiry in the prairie States of the West, we are convinced that the most injury to fruit trees has resulted from hot, drying winds from the south- west, and that a screen against these is quite necessary. For a mound of diciduous trees on level ground, a central plat of European larch, surrounded by belts of the American larch, soft maple, _ honey locust, black oak, wild cherry, hickory, ironwood, crab-apple, and wild plum, has been suggested. But these combinations are too vari- able for a general rule, and in each locality, the planter, with a knowl- edge of the habits of growth of the trees at his command, will be able to vary them to suit his purposes. RELATIVE VALUE OF GROWTH AT DIFFERENT AGES. It-is very often found that the layers of annual growth are thicker when young, and that they progressively diminish in width as they increase in size. The conifers of the Rocky Mountains, and elsewhere, often show this fact in a conspicuous manner. In other kinds, as the elm, the wood is more profitable when cut young, because the timber deteriorates in quality with age. The inner wood of a large elm tree is comparatively spongy and weak. But in other woods, as the oak, the value increases in a gaining progression with age, and large timbers are worth more per cubic foot than small ones, because they can be applied to more important uses when of - larger size. The annual revenue from the growth of an oak tree, of the species commonly used in ship building, has been very carefully deter- mined from the mean of a great number of records in France, and is stated as follows: | f Fr. ¢. Pree OO amerite OlG er asi. ccanecwtavonidet te. sieeve sai tctedoees << 20 10 perann tm Maree: LO WayeaitscO lista: eeane Met Sackidas thos cwsaonetemarsriense*4: - 0 80 per annum. fires 1 AO means Ol dsisse nite otae sence oak soveseainate snc. 2 OO per annum. Mice: 200 weatsrOlGl. 5.2%. siv-2 otemase donee sec aa. 5 2 , but these can never traverse a belt ofthick woods seven or eight rods in width to devastate an adjoining field. The cool damp soil of such as belt presents an impassable barrier to their march, the same as to the grass- opper. Citing from I. T. Thomas, he continues: Another important advantage has been occasionally afforded by the shelter of wood-lands. Itis well known that rust in wheat, iscommonly most prevalent on low and mucky lands; yet, at other times, and in its most virulent form, it seems borne on the wind, and often destroys thousands of acres on all kinds of soil in one sweeping blight. An instance of this kind occured in Northern Indiana, in 1840. Early and late sown, on compact and spongy soil, on hill and dale, cleared land and prairie, were all alike affected. In every instance, however, where the crop was sheltered by woodland, it was least injured. An extensive farmer in Ontario county, New York, informed me, some years ago, that out of two hundred acres of promising wheat, which he then had growing, all was completely de- stroyed, except those portions sheltered by woods, the total loss being four or five thou- sand dollars, most of which, he believes, would have been saved, had his land been protected by timber belts. Instruction in forest-culture recommended at the State Agricultural College, at Amherst. The executive committee of the Massachusetts Agricultural College, (Amherst), in a report made in February, 1876, included the following recommendation, which, being fully discussed, was adopted: It is also recommended, that some instruction be given in forestry, both theo- retically and practically, and that special attention be paid to the raising of forest trees from seed, their care and treatment in the nursery, their permanent planting in various portions of the farm, and the subsequent care of the plantations. The 94. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. time is not far distant, when every farmer in the country, will, in his own inter- est, be obliged to give some attention to the subject of tree-planting, and such a course as is here recommended, will be of advantage to the students, and to the State at large. Similar considerations apply to the raising of fruit-trees. A nursery of reliable standard fruit-trees, adapted to one section, ought to be a source of some income to the institution. BristoL County.—Mr. Morrill Allen, of Pembroke, Mass., in a letter relating to tree-planting, written December, 1874, says : A man in Bristol county, about fifty years ago, planted a field somewhat ex- hausted with acorns ; when the young trees were two or three inches high, he plowed and hoed, as in a field of Indian corn; tne trees grew, to the astonishment of the whole neighborhood, and in less than forty years, were ripe forthe ax. About a century since, there was an experiment in this town in planting the white-oak for ship-timber, the success of which ought to have encouraged frequent repetition. The grove was in cutting for timber thirty years since, and a man between seventy and eighty years old told me, that in his boyhood, he assisted in planting these trees. It is not to the existing generation so helpless an undertaking as some would represent it, to plant forest-trees, even those of slow growth. I recollect meas- uring the circumference of an oak tree, in West Newbury, the acorn, of which was planted by Benjamin Poore, who is yet comparatively, a young man, and I thing it measured 27 inches. It is a well proportioned, handsome tree. Had he planted at the same time fifteen acres of similar soil, it would have become before now, an inexhaustible wood-lot for the use of one family. The general elevation of this district above sea-level, is about 80 feet ; highest point, 210; prevailing winds south-west, and rain-fall, 46 inches. The native timber consisted of several species of oak, the walnut, maple, pine, and hemlock, used for lumber. A variety of trees for fuel and cab- inet-work, are found in the forests. There has been but little clearing within the last century ; the woods have simply been cut off and allowed to grow again. In a few cases, forest-planting has been done on a small scale, but so recently, that no result has been reached, though the plant- ings are usually in a healthy condition. Fires set by locomotives, or by careless persons, sometimes do a great deal of damage——(Elisha Shade, Somerset, Bristol county, Mass. Having been, for thirty years past, more or less engaged in buying woodland and cutting it off, I wish to state, that I know, from careful observation, that an acre of good land, where there is a mixture of the several kinds of oak and walnut (hickory), cut off while young and thrifty, will produce, during the first 20 or 25 years, a cord of wood yearly. I believe, that most kinds of hard wood are worth 20 or 30 per cent. more, for fuel, at the age of 25 years, than at 75.—(A. M. Ide, of South Attleborough, to George B. Emerson: Trees of Massachusetts, p. 26.) The Massachusetts Society for Promotion of Agriculture, in April, 1876, offered premiums of $1,000, $600, and $400, for first, second, and third best plantations of not less than five acres, to be made of European larch, except in Barnstable, Dukes, and Nantucket counties, in which the Scotch pine or the Corsican fir, or both the latter, must be used. The plantations must originally consist of at least 2,700 trees to the acre, and the land must be poor, worn out, or unfit for agricultural use. They also offered $600 and $400 for first and second best plantations of five acres, or more, of American white ash, at first having 5,000 trees to the acre. The plantation must be made in the spring of 1877, and the prizes are to be awarded in the summer of 1887. The directions for planting were as follows. Larch and pine. When the nature of the soil will permit, shallow furrows 4 feet apart should be run one way across the field to be planted. This is best done during the autumn previous to planting. Then by planting in the furrows, and inserting the plants FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 95 4 feet apart in the rows, the wholeland will be covered with plants standing 4 feet apart each way. Planted at this distance, 2,720 plants will be required to the acre. On hilly, rocky land, which is especially recommended for the cultivation of the European larch, and where it is impossible to run furrows, it will be only necessary to open with a spade, holes large enough toadmit the roots of the plants, care being taken to set them as near 4 feet each way as the nature of the ground will admit. In very exposed situations on the sea-coast, it is recommended to plant as many as 5,000 trees to the acre, the plants being inserted more thickly on the outsides of the plantations in order that the young trees may furnish shelter to each other. It is imperative to plant the larch as early in the season as the ground can be worked. No other tree begins to grow so early, and if the operation of transplanting it is delayed until the new shoots have pushed, it is generally followed by the destruc- tion of the plant. The Scotch and Corsican pines can be planted up to the Ist of May. Ash. Land in condition to grow corn or an average hay crop, is suited to produce a profitable crop of white ash. Deep, moist land, rather than that which is light and gravelly, should be selected for this tree. The land should be plowed, har- rowed, and made as mellow as possible during the autumn previous, that the trees may be planted as soon as the ground can be worked in the spring. As soon as the frost is out, mark out the field with furrows 4 feet apart, and in- sert the trees 2 feet apartin the rows. This will give 5,445 plants to the acre, which, at the end of ten years, must be thinned one-half. These thinnings are valuable for barrel-hoops, &c. It is recommended to cultivate between the rows for two or three years to keep down the weeds and prevent the soil from baking. At the end of that time the ground will probably be entirely shaded by the trees, and further cultivation will not be necessary. General directions for tree planting. Be careful not to expose the roots of trees to the wind and sun more than is necessary during the operation of transplanting. More failures in tree-planting arise from carelessness in this particular than from any other cause. To prevent this, carry the trees to the field to be planted in bundles covered with mats; lay them down, and cover the roots with wet loam, and only remove them from the bundles as they are actually required for planting. In planting, the roots should be carefully spread out and the soil worked among them with the hand. p When the roots are covered press the earth firmly about the plant with the oot. Insert the plant to the depth at which it stood before being transplanted. Select, if possible, for tree-planting a cloudy or a rainy day. It is better to plant after the middle of the day than before it. All young plantations must be protected from cattle and other browsing animals— the greatest enemies, next to man, to young trees and the spread of forest growth. Experiments of D. C. Scofield in Tree-planting, at Elgin, Ill.* This plantation was begun in 1858, with imported and American seed- lings and seeds; and is on a rich, dry, undulating prairie, with black loam passing into clay at a depth of 4 to 6 feet, where it is underlaid b coarse gravel. It consisted, at first, of about 12,000 trees; 8,000 set from 1858 to 1862, and 4,000 in 1866. The plants were usually from 8 to 12 inches long, were transplanted in nursery rows, and in two years to their permanent places. The ground had been cultivated three years from prairie sod, and was well pulverized. The planting was done in furrows of proper depth, level places of proper depth being prepared by the spade, and care being taken to prevent drying of the roots. The larch *Communicated to the Horticultural Society of Northern Illinois, and published with the “Transac, of Ill. Hort. Soc., 1876, p. 284. 96 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. (forming the greater part) were 2 to 4 feet high when transplanted, and the evergreens 13 to 3 feet. Having been transplanted once or twice in the nursery, they were well stocked with roots. They were cultivated three to six years, and beans planted in the wider spaces; and from this time, excepting the black walnuts and elms, they protected themselves. These and the white ash needed longer cultivation on account of later leaving. The varieties planted were the Scotch, black Austrian, and white pines, Norway and white spruces, American and Siberian arbor-vitae, hemlock, and European and American silver fir; and of deciduous trees, the black walnut, silver-leaf, sugar, and red maples, box-elder, English, red, and white American elms, chestnut, horse-chestnut, European mountain ash, white ash, redbud (of Southern Illinois), European and American larch, and cypress. European larch.—This is now 28 to 32 feet high, with diameters varying accord- ing to density, the most being 14 inches at 1 foot from the ground. Nearly every tree grew; average annual growth the first nine years, 25 feet. On the 19th of October, 1869, a severe frost, coming before the tops had hardened, checked them, and the gain was not over two inches a year, or a foot in six seasons, till 1876, when they grew 18 inches. No bird or insect has attacked them. Black walnuts grew so long as cultivated, but when exposed, from the dying out of a row of soft maples, and by the enroachment of sod, they became stunted in growth, except a few that grew in a depression, equally dry with the rest, but of richer soil, where the trees were now 20 to 30 feet high and 12 to 16 inches in diameter. A block of black walnuts, 3 by 16 rods, in rows 4 feet apart and 2 feet between in the rows, was cultivated eight years and then left. Some of these, in a basin of vegetable mold, are now 4 to 6 inches in thickness and 20 to 25 feet high. The rest are 2 to 4 inches in diameter and 15 to 20 feet high, the average amount of wood growth being one-fifth of those in the basin. A neighbor had planted walnuts, in 1844, that had been transplanted twice. They were 20 feet apart; had been in cultivated ground twenty-five years. They are now 17 inches thick at 2 feet from the ground, and one that had been cultivated till now on one side was 23 inches, with a hight of 40 feet. These trees have a spreading top, the branches beginning at 7 to 8 feet up, and bear fruit abundantly. These facts lead to the conclusion that black walnut will succeed on dry, rich soil, if cultivation is continued till the trees are able to shade out the grass, and that when planted alone, and without shading nurses, they will die. Mr. S. pre- fers the European larch as a nurse. The sugar maple is found to agree well, and | might be used for this purpose. These other trees secure a clean, upright stem to the walnut, an important object with this timber. It must have deep, rich soil. Silver-leaf maple——This promised well everywhere ten or twelve years, and some trees had a diameter of 18 inches at the collar in 15 years. They are liable to break from winds in summer and from ice in winter, and many show signs of early maturity and decay. They are particularly liable to injury from grass. It grows best in wet soils. White ash.—Trees set in 1856, 1 inch in thickness and 7 feet high, 2 rods apart, are now 30 feet high, 8 to 14 inches thick, and the spread of the limbs 20 to 25 feet. They have a strong tendency to sprout from the stump of the parent tree. Trees from seed, planted in 1858, and set in forest rows, with European larch and black walnut, are straight and smooth 25 to 30 feet high and 3 to 4 inches in diameter. Sugar-maples, planted 20 feet apart, 7 feet high, in 1856, are now 25 feet high and 6 to 8 inches thick, spreading 12 to 17 feet. Trees from seed, planted in 1858, have a height of 20 feet and thickness of 3 to 6 inches. It grows very slow in prairie soil for fifteen to twenty years, after which it makes satisfactory growth. Trees an inch in diameter when set, thirty-three years ago, are now over 3 feet in circumference at a foot from the ground, 30 feet high, and 25 feet spread. A wild cherry tree, set in the same ground, twenty-six years from seed, is now 5 feet round. Box elder grows rapidly, gaining a diameter of 6 inches in seven years from planting, and forms a fine head, 16feet across. It is not liable to break from winds and ice, like the soft maple. _ FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. Butternut grows well under cultivation, being 5 to 7 inches through, and a well ’ proportioned head. It bears nuts. Redbud, good only for ornamental planting; slow grower. American larch grows nearly as well as the European, but with less regular form; branches, wild and straggling ; height, 25 feet ; diameter, 4 to 6 inches. Red elm grows rapidly, some trees being 6 to 8 or ten inches thick; but at this age many haye an unhealthy appearance. It is not worthy of cultivation on dry land. White elm.—In regard to growth, variety of soil needed, and habit of late leay- ing, it resembles the walnut, requiring the same treatment, and leading to the same results. Valueless on common prairie without cultivation until able to pro- tect itself. There is this difference between these two trees, however, that while the walnut requires a deep, rich, dry soil, the white elm will flourish in a wet soil, less deep and rich, with annual cultivation for twenty years. These two trees | make about the same growth on common dry prairie as they do in the “sinks,” with a cultivation of four or five years. English elm makes a more vigorous growth and a more beautiful foilage than either of the American varieties, and will do well with less cultivation. Chestnut.—A total failure on prairie soil. Only one tree remained on the ground. and this is the only one known in the county. It stands 20 feet high, 6 inches in diameter, and is kept in slightly growing condition from the forest protection _around it. It grows satisfactorily on the lighter soil of the Mississippi bluffs. Lombardy poplar grows rapidly and beautiful a few years, but is unhealthy and valueless in ten or fifteen years, especially so on rich soils. Trees of ten years’ growth are 8 to 10 inches thick and 25 to 30 feet high. Horse-chestnut— Hardy, but an exceedingly slow grower on prairie, yet grows well on gravelly or sandy soil. EVERGREENS.— White pines are 30 to 40 feet high in forests 6 to 8 feet apart, with a diameter of 10 to 14 inches. When close, they are equal hight but slender, and denuded of side branches. The white pines of this plantation are from trees from seedlings gathered from American forests in 1866, planted 12 feet apart. They are 6 to 10 teet high in 1876. They are filled with Scotch pine for nurses, with trees grown from seed gathered from trees imported and planted in 1858. They were . cultivated till able to protect themselves. Scotch Pine, in close plantations, 4 to 6 feet apart, have a height of 20 to 26 feet, and a diameter, of 6 to 7 inches. When standing separate, they have twice this diameter, and form a beautiful tree, valuable as a wind-break, and growing surely and rapidly on nearly every variety of soil. They are very hardy. Black Austrian Pine grows equally well with the Scotch, and mainly valuable for ornament and wind-breaks. Norway Spruce, when planted alone, spreads nearly as wide as it grows in height, forming a beautiful pyramid. The greatest diameter of the trunk of these trees, is 15 inches, from trees planted in 1857, one foot in height. American White Spruce—This is a beautitul tree, equally, if not excelling the Norway, and with the same habits. American Arbor-vitx, (white cedar)—This forms a beautiful tree when young, and standing alone, and it may be successfully sheared to any desirable form. It grows slowly, and when planted closely in rows, 6 feet apart, and only one foot in the row, has a diameter of 2 to 4 inches, and 16 feet in height. Siberian—Arbor vite, is equally hardy with the American, and grows more com- pact and beautiful. Hemlock, when planted on prairie soil, makes a slow and dwarfish growth, till, twelve or fifteen yearsold. lt is better on hard soil. American Silver Fir (Balsam).—A rapid, beautiful grower, its main value being as an ornamental tree; is less hardy in the extremes of cold following exceed- ingly severe droughts, as in 186465 ; as in case of the great droughts which then visited this western country, when a great many of the finest of the balsam trees, many of them 40 feet in height, died. European silver fir—This is too tender for this climate, and has only flourished in protected situations. It has a heightof 30 feet, and a diameter of 6 to 7 inches, and should be used only as an ornamental tree. Yet, this tree shows early old age, and is less beautiful in twenty or thirty years. } 98 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. Experience of Tree-culture, in Illinois. Mr. Samuel Edwards, of Mendota, Ill., reporting from a committee of the State Horticultural Society, in 1876,* speaks of the condition and prospects of tree-planting, and of the success and failure that has attended the experiments hitherto tried: For several years the locust used to be the timber tree, and was quite extensively planted; and when the beautiful groves, on which so many had placed their de- pendence for future fencing, were destroyed by the borer, a general depression came over the minds of tree-planters. For a time their energies for work in this direction, were paralyzed, and it is only recently, from observation of the growth and value of a few other varieties of trees as yet successfully cultivated here, eon- fidence in timber-growing is being restored. Many have made small beginnings ; a few are planting extensively of black walnut, European larch, ash, of different varieties, white and Scotch pines, white willow, silver maple and ash-leaved maple, all of which give satisfaction, except the silver maple, which is, in some cases, troubled with a borer, and limbs are broken in severe storms. Some have advocated extensive planting of the chestnut, and for over twenty years, they were thrifty on a prairie mound, clay soil, with good, natural under- drainage in my grounds. A severe winter succeeding a drought fatally injured one of the two trees set in 1851, and on my new grounds, at Mendota, only some 4 feet toa stiff clay, they are very unsatistactory; many trees 4 to 6 feet high, were killed in the winter of 187475. The tulip tree, for twenty-five years from first planting, grew finely. Quite a number on the grounds of Arthur Bryant and Tracy Reeve, at Princeton, and at “ The Evergreens,” Lamoille, failed under the same circumstances as the chestnut. The English walnuts, grown at La Porte, Ind., were brought to one of the meetings of this society a few years since, by W. H. Ragan, with the report, that it proved hardy, and had borne fruit there several years. Itried a second hundred from an eastern nursery ; and they have all winter killed. Doubtless, all of these varieties planted on timber soil, in the southern and central parts of the State will succeed. It is evident, from past experience, that it will require several years to test varieties of trees before planting exten- sively on the prairies of our section of country. ; A good beginning is being made in planting trees along the public highways, for which white elm, ash, and silver-maple, are generally used. It is to be regret- ted, that some continue to plant the Lombardy poplar, which is very short-lived, and timber of so little value. Centennial trees were very generally set by our people who plant at all. Several cemeteries, a number of farms in this vicinity, and the Blackstone Public School grounds, in Mendota, have been improved the present year, by planting extensive evergreen screens. How any one can reside on our bleak prairies during the passage of one of our polar waves, like that of December 9, with the mercury at —23°, and not decide to provide timber-shelter for his family and animals, is past my comprehension. Yet, how many men, with good sense in every other respects, and with ample means, continue to live without this merciful provision! It really does seem certain, that,at no distant day, a general awakening to this work of necessity, must break out all over the prairies of the north-west. Of ornamental deciduous trees, as yet planted, only to a limited extent, I would place first on the list, our lovely sugar-maple. If there is a finer avenue of decid- uous trees in our State than the one of sugar-maple, planted by Arthur Bryant, some forty years since, it has not been my good fortune to see it. Norway maple is one of the best, valuable, on account of retaining its foilage late ; cut-leaeyd weeping birch, very fine ; weeping mountain ash; horse chestnut, slow grower, desirable ; Japan ginko, unique; American linden, if foreign, would be called for; magnolia acuminata, unsurpassed. The following do not endure severe winters : European ash, and several weeping varieties of it; European weeping linden ; weeping thorn, several varieties ; rosemary-leafed weeping willow. Kilmarnock weeping willow, though hardier than the forgoing, is frequently injured enough to render it undesirable. *Transactions of Illinois Horticultural Society, 1876, p. 115. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 99 COMPARATIVE VALUE OF WOODS FOR FUEL.—EXPERIMENTS BY MARCUS BULL. A paper read before the American Philosophical Society, April 7, 1826, by Marcus Bull, of Philadelplia,* gives the results of careful experi- ments upon qualities and relative values of American woods, that have been regarded as trustworthy and valuable. In conducting these experi- ments, Mr. Bull construced a room within a room,{ so that the walls of the inner one could be kept uniform in temperature, and combustion was made in a stove with an abundance of pipe. The time and effects were carefully noted, and all circumstances affecting draught of air, size, and condition of fuel, &c., were made as uniform as possible. > SUES lh © BOs [4 ty p ie |8s 18 | 3 g |8 |€25 See = a -|ae asias § oS Ss ec cS . |SEla™ Is |S |eSlasleto [248 3/¢ = 3 ago Los © jeciee |, 12 leeieciese loses > |SOIED 12 | OS (RRR Coa G ISR o : Sv i/osis.. |Ba| pSISTISP I eGosise 8 Common and Botanical Names.f z = oe So Fo Ea Syjoy 28 as Ore BF lon ls2elh | lyslsolsae laser ° aS Lees SME S|Cel Se ets lo wSisacie |e |28l2s\S35e\Seu5 gq |ePIS FIG |S [Saldoltagelo,2” S S |SSplo 18 lSeiGalssonlsg ce o - |ona/3 5 fen 2o|8So6la5 a8 Sets a | | | |e > h. m. White ash—F7a2xinus AHLETICANA «10. 000-00 01-00 .772|8450| 25.74|.547/28.78| 888] 31] 6 40 77 Apple tree—Pyrus QlUs 11.20 ee cece eee e ee eee 697/3115| 25. |.545/23.41| 779) 33| 6 40 70 White beech—Fagus sylvestrise...csee--+0-2e0+- .724|3236| 19.62) .518/27.26| 685] 23) 6 65 Black birch—Betula lenta.........+-20202-2-0+- .697|3115| 19.40) .528/22.52] 604) 27| 6 63 White birch—Betula populifolia .....-.+++-+.--- 5380/2869 19. | .364/19.15| 4650) 24) 6 48 Butter-nut—Fuglans cathartica.........- FOOo ae .567|2534| 20.79] .237|12.47| 527) 42) 6 51 Red cedar— Juniperus virginiana .565|2525| 24.72|.238/12.52| 624) 50| 6 40 56 Arnerican chestnut— Castanea vesca.....-.-.--- .522|2333| 25.29|.379|19.94| 590) 30) 6 40 52 Wild cherry—Cerasus virginiana ...6 +1. 20e00-- 597|2668| 21.70) .411/21.63| 579) 27) 6 10 55 Dog wood—Cornus florida.......++0.22 see0-2e- .815|2643| 21. | .550/28.94| 765) 96) 6 10 15 White elm— Ulyzus americand......- 2.200. eeeee 5802592] 24.85) .357)18.79| 644) 34) 6 40 58 Sour gum—Wyssa@ sylvatica. ....2+- 220-222 21 ee .703 3142| 22.16|.400}21.05| 696) 33) 6 20 67 Sweet gum—Liguidambar styracifilua....-..+.--- .634/ 2834} 19.69) -413)21.73) 558) 26) 6 57 Shell-bark hickory—Fuglans sguamosa.......-- 1.000 4469) 26.22) .625/32.89|1172) 36) 6 40 100 Pig-nut hickory—$uglans porcina ....-...+-++- .949|4241| 25.22) .637/33.52|1070| 32) 6 40 95 Red-heart hickory— Fuglans laciniata?.......-- .829|3705) 22.90] .509/26.78| 848) 32) 6 30 81 Witch-hazel— Hamamelis virginica .......+---- .784|8505| 21.40|.368/19.36| 750) 39) 6 10 72 American holly—Jlex ofaca.......+-+02 02 sees 602) 2691; 22.77| .374|19.68| 613) 31) 6 20 57 American hornbeam—Carvfinus americana....- .720|3218) 19. |.455/23.94) 611) 25) 6 65 Mountain laurel—Kalmia latifolia .........-..- .663| 2963} 24.02|.457/24.05| 712! 30) 6 40 66 Hard maple—Acer saccharinumt.......++-++-++- (644/2878 21.43] -431/22.68] 617/ 271 6 10 60 Soft maple—Acer rubrum... ..ceeceresees ...-| .597/2668| 20.64|.370|19.47) 551} 28| 6 54 Large magnolia—Magnolia grandiflora......... .605|/2704| 21.59) .406)21.36) 584) 27) 6 10 56 Chestnut white oak— Quercus prinus palustris. | .885|3959| 22.76)-481/25.31) 900; 36) 6 30 86 White Oak— Quercus G1bQ... 1.2.1 e ev eee eee eee .855|3821| 21.62)-401/21.10|} 826]; 39} 6 20 81 Shell-bark white oak— Quercus obtusiloba......- .775|8464| 21.50) -437|22.99| 745) 32) 6 20 74 Barren scrub oak—Quercus catesb@i.....-+++++ .747|3339| 23-17) -492|20.63| 774| 38] 6 30 73 Pin 0ak— Quercus PAlUstrise...ccceeececceeceeee .747|8839| 22.22| .436|22.94| 742) 32] 6 20 71 Scrub black oak— Quercus Bantsterz .......--+- 728) 3254) 23.80] -387|29.36| 774) 38) 6 30 71 Red oak— Quercus 7Ubra. .-. 200. ee eer ececeeees -728|3254| 22.43) -400'21.05) 680) 30) 6 20 69 Barren 0ak— Quercus ferrugined s..+.++0-+-+--- .694|3102| 22.37) -447|23.52| 694} 29) 6 20 66 Rock chestnnt oak—Quwercus prinus monticala. | .678|3030) 20.86)-436/22.94) 632) 28) 6 61 Yellow oak— Quercus prinus acuminata........| -653)2919| 21.60) -295)15.52) 631) 41/ 6 10 60 Spanish oak— Quercus falcatad.....2.0. 222222002 -548)2449| 22.95) .362)19.05) 562) 30) 6 20 52 Persimmon—Diospyros virginiana ...0.-.+-++- -711|3178} 23.44) .469|24.68) 745} 30] 6 30 69 Yellow pine (soft)—Pinus mzitis.........------+| +551/2463) 23.75) .333)17.52| 585) 33) 6 30 54 Jersey pine—Pinws t20PS... 01-002 cece eee cee .478}2137| 24.88) .385|20.26| 532) 26) 6 40 48 Pitch pine—Pinus rigidd.......se+0- 222. ee neeee -42611904| 26.76|.298|15.68} 510} 33] 6 40 43 White pine—Pinus strobus ....2. 0.2 e cee ce ences .418|1868} 24.35|.293)15.42) 455| 30] 6 40 42 Yellow poplar—Lyrzodendron tulipifera........ .563|2516| 21.81) .383/20.15; 549} 27° 5 10 52 Lombardy poplar--Populus dilatata. .....+.... .897|1774| 25. |-245|12.89) 444) 34) 6 40 40 Sassafras—Laurus Sassafras .....20.0.0.0% .-' ,618]2762| 22.58) .427/22.47| 624) 28) 6 20 59 Wild service—Avronia arbored.......-.+.---.--- .887|3964| 22.62) .594/31.26) 897! 29) 6 20 84 Sycamore—Acer pseudo-plantanus.......-.+---- .535|2391| 23.60) .374|19.68) 564) 29) 6 30 52 Black walnut—Fuglans nigra ..........-.---- -681/3044| 22.56) .418)22. 687) 31] 5 20 65 Swamp whortleberry— Vaccinium corymbosum. | .752|3361| 23.30) .505)26.57) 783) 29! 6 30 73 * “Experiments to determine the Comparative Value of the principal Varieties of Fuel used in the United States, and also in Europe, and onthe Ordinary Apparatus used in their combustion.”? By Marcus Bull, Philadelphia, 1827, 8 vo , p. 103. {The outer room was 11 x 14 feet and about 11 feet high; the inner one was cubic, 8 feet on a side, and containing 512 cubic feet. tThese names are generally according to Michaux, and in some cases are different from those now generally adopted. 100 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. EXPERIMENTS IN TREE-PLANTING BY MR. JOSEPH S&S. FAY, AT WOOD’S HALL, BARNSTABLE COUNTY, MASS. At the close of the season of 1875, the plantation of Mr. Fay included something over 125 acres, of which about 100 were sown broadcast, chiefly in the spring, and about 25 were set. with imported trees. The seed sown were chiefly those of the native pitch-pine, with some white pine, the Austrian, Scotch, and Corsican pine, the Norway spruce, and the European larch. The imported trees number about 35,000, consist- ing of the Austrian, Scotch, and Corsican pines, Norway spruce, Norway maple, English sycamore (Acer pseudo-platanus), English oak, alder, Scotch birch and larch, wych elm and Huntington and red Germain willows. There were also set several thousand native pines from the eastern part of Falmouth. This plantation 1 is between Buzzard’s Bay on the west and north and and Martha’s Vineyard Sound on the east and south, the highest eleva- tion being about 150 feet above the sea. The surface i is uneven and made up of abrupt hills and deep hollows, sprinkled over with bowlders of granite, and the soil a drift formation of clay and gravel with a yellow or sandy loam. It was, before seeding, an old pasture ground, with no tree except an oak, that springs out of the huckleberry bushes here and there, but hardly rising above them on account of the wind, and from being kept down by browsing. The annual rain-fall in this section is about 45 inches, and the prevailing winds in summer are southerly, and in winter northerly. The native pines of Mr. Fay’s Fanta were set in 1853-1856, and imported trees were set in 1852, 1853, 1855, 1871, and 1872. Native pine seeds were sown in 1858, 1861, 1864, and 1868. The foreign seeds were sown in 1861, 1862, 1868. The results are stated as follows :* The Scotch pine from the seed have proved on the whole, including prompt germination, the best grower and very hardy ; but the weevil affects the symetry of many trees. The Norway spruce and English oak have done well, and the white pine ; but all three suffer when much exposed, as on the outside of a plan- tation, to the strong salt winds. The Austrian pine does well, but is slow and irregular i in germinating, and’ makes a later start from the seed. The larch has not come well from the seed ; from the nursery or as imported it does remarkably well; so with the Scotch birch and alder. The Scotch pine does finely from the seed or the nursery, and from the latter the English sycamore does well. All have done better than the native pitch-pine. One kind of pine, though not fully tested by me, promises better than the rest, namely, the Corsican (Pinus laricio). In my first importation I ordered five hun- dred, but when transplanted in my absence they were mixed with the Austrian, and I lost sight of them for ten years. I was then so struck with their great vigor, beauty and tine promise, that in 1868 I imported some seed and commenced sow- ing them, mixed with other kinds, upon vacant lands, and have since kept it up. Some of those that came up are very strong and healthy, while others are effected by some insect or a kind of blight. They are very hardy and beautiful when not ‘so effected. I think that some of the nurserymen have imported and sell them under the name of Austrian. Of those sown in 1868 some are (in 1875) over eight feet high, of which nearly or quite five feet grew in the last three years. At an early day. I tried some seed of the French maritime pine (Pinus pinaster maratima ) which were so successfully planted on the west coast of France under the first Napoleon ; but, after germininating and growing thriftily to the height of six feet, they were winter-killed. This was the | experience on Nantucket “and Martha’s Vineyard Islands, where they were tried extensively. Some of the Scotch and Austrian Bunes, Roryey spruces, and Scotch larches *COM assachusetts Ploughman,”? February 26, 1876, in answer to enquiries by. Prof. C. 8, ‘Sargent. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 101 which I obtained from my brother, Mr. Richard 8. Fay, of Lynn, in 1853, proba- bly imported by him in 1850, are about 40 feet high, and from 10 to 14 inches in diameter one foot from the ground. Some native white pines set out about the same time have done as well. Of those imported in 1853, many are about 30 feet high, and 8 to 12 inches in diameter one foot from the ground. Of the Scotch pines from seed sown in 1861, some, favorably situated—that is, not crowded and in fair soil and shelter—are 30 feet high and 10 inches through the butt a foot from the ground. Most of them were not too thickly sown in 1862 and 1863, are up- wards of 20 feet high and 6 inches in diameter one foot from the ground. All the pines have done well from the seed, on the whole, except the native pitch-pines, which became sickly, and which, after a good growth to a certain point, Iam cutting out for fuel, as not worth keeping. Some, however, that I transplanted in 1853, 1854, 1855, are very strong and healthy, being at least 30 feet high and 10 to 12 inches in diameter. I am told that the seedling native trees, of which many acres have been planted in Nantucket, are proving worthless and are being cut down. ; My first importations of trees were in 1871 and 1872, and consisted of English alder, Scotch birch, Scotch larch, English sycamore, Norway spruce, and Austrian * -Seotch, and Corsican pines. The alder I have found to bea rapid grower, very hardy and ornamental, well adapted for a screen ora shelter to other trees. Some -_ which were set out at 13 to 2 feet high in 1871, are now 8 and 10 feet high. The ~ birches have done well, and so with the pines; the sycamore and Norway spruce not as well, needing, perhaps, two years on the nursery or a bettersoil. The Scotch larches were heated on the voyage, and the summer following being very dry, many died. Thosethat survived have recovered, and, being now finely started, are making a vigorous growth. ; My first purchases of foreign trees were planted about my house, in the open- ings of a thirty acre lot of oak and beach woods near by, and on the bare gravelly hills overlooking the Sound and raked by strong winds. The trees I imported in 1853, after two years in the nursery, I planted out, some in clumps of a quarter and half an acre each, on an old pasture which I did not “seed down,” and which had not a tree upon it. I surrounded them with fences of wire drawn through cedar posts to keep off the cattle, who find in them a grateful shade, now the trees are too large to be injured by them. Others I placed along the walls of my culti- vated fields, and some on the margin of my old deciduous woods, so as to afford a shelter and a variety of foilage. My importations of 1871 and 1872 were planted as soon as received on an old and poor pasture land, where I intended they should remain. My method was to run with oxen deep single furrows 7 feet apart, and then set the trees in them 7 feet from each other. The land is rough and of the average soil of a worn out pasture. These have done well, except those larches which died, as before stated, in consequence of being heated on the voyage, tak- ing into the account the saving of labor and the use of more valuable land, by not putting them into a nursery, though if placed there at the first start they may have seemed to do better. The trees were introduced as a matter of taste, and as an experiment, without the calculation of any immediate advantage. Still I think if it had been near a market, or one had been sought, there would have been a profit in the sale of the surplus young trees, and now already in the sales of wood, if only the thinnings. The land has been, no doubt, improved by the deposit of thousands of loads of leaves upon it and by the shade afforded it, while it has been lightened and lifted by the permeation of the roots of the trees. Much of the labor has been done at intervals of farm work, and chiefly without professional supervision. When I bought my place in the fall of 1850, except a few stinted red cedars on Parker’s Point, and some white cedars in the swamps, there was not an evergreen tree within three miles of my house, and hardly any tree of any kind in sight of it. The woods (oak, beech, and hickory) were in the dells and valleys behind the hills fronting the sea, and it was maintained that trees would not grow and could not be made to do so in the face of the salt-laden winds from the south and south- west. The exposure was certainly great and the soil poor, and trees planted singly or sparcely, perhaps, could not have resisted it, but close planting made a shelter, and those not specially from an inland habitat (like the white maple) have done well, and seem to the manor born. In answer to the question, “If you were to do the work over again, could you improve on the methods employed by you? Mr. Fay replied: 102 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. I think I should recommend, where the ground was not too stony and rough, instead of sowing seed broadcast, to run parallel furrows, not deep, running east and west (so the mid-day sun will not strike across them) seven feet apart, and drop the seeds in them, merely pressing them into the ground, and not covering them more than this, if at all. This, in the first place, especially on the hill-side where the furrows should be run at right angles with the slope and not vertically, will prevent the seed from washing down to the low places; in the second place, the seed will be likely to come up more at the same time, and would be more uni- formly distributed than can be done broadcast, unless sowed when there is snow on the ground, and also less seed would be required and less would be wasted ; in the third place, the side of the furrow would tend to shade the young germ, which, on the open sward, in a dry time, is apt to be withered and destroyed by the heat. In my plantings, where the trees have come up too thickly, I have transplanted them to spots where the seed has failed or was not sown, but this makes extra labor. If sowed in furrows, the seed might be dropped at intervals of four or five feet, and even then, in a few years, if all were to come up they would require thinning. In this case, the surplus could be sold or planted elsewhere. They would make good nursery plants. . As to imported trees, when it is considered that the average cost, landed at the farm, of English grown plants one or two feet high, is less than one cent each, it - would be a saving of time to procure them and set them out in the place where they are to grow. There is a little uncertainty in their condition, but, as a rule, they come in good order. This requires two plantings. My last I placed, as I have stated, in the field where they were to grow, in parallel furrows. I think it would be better to plow cross furrows the same distance apart, or say 10 feet each way, and plant the trees at the intersection. Unless the land is very much exposed to the wind, 10 feet is near enough, as even then, in about seven years, a man could hardly walk between the rows. If there are bleak hills to be planted, then the trees should be nearer together, say 6 or 7 feet, so as to shelter each other more; but, when they get up and are doing well, they ought to be thin- ned. But for this need of shelter in exposed places they would do better in view of atwenty-five years growth to be 20 feet apart each way. Up to a certain point they help each other by proximity, but it takes great courage to cut down strong and thrifty trees to make room. Yet on a farm the thinnings may be useful, and when near large towns, would be salable for cheap rustic fencesand inclosures, and certainly for kindling stuff. It is also to be considered that if planted too far apart, the growth would be more lateral than vertical in proportion, and the trees would be more spreading, and tend less to taper form and slenderness. In planting out at once on rough land instead of first in a nursery, though the tree may take a year or two to get a start, for the roots to find their way into the closer soil of an old field, there is a great saving of labor and not much loss of time, as each transplanting checks a tree in its growth: Onethousand trees will cover an acre well, if planted six or seven feet apart, and five hundred, if nine or ten feet from each other, and after the furrows are made, two active, handy men could plant one to two acresa day. Care should be taken not to plant too near other older trees, lest they overshadow and kill out the new planting, or the overhang- ing limbs chafe and keep down the leading shoots. I have wasted a great many trees by planting them in the old woods where the spaces seemed large and open, by their being overgrown and shaded out. If I were again to set out young trees among the old woods, I should cut the latter all down clean, and let them start again from the stumps with the new planting. If this is not done, and it is desir- able to keep the old trees, they must then be carefully watched and trimmed and lopped, as the young ones grow up under and about them. AndI have lost many trees by their being planted or sowed too near each other. When trees are two or three feet high, it seems quite safe to plant them five feet apart, but soon they are too close, and the most vigorous crowd out and destroy the weakest. In my seeded plantations in many spots, they have come up at the rate of 40,000 trees to the acre ; hence my advice to mark off the fields in furrows and sow in them rather broadcast. It would be a great saving every way, except in a little labor at the start. Nor in sowing should I now mix the seeds of different pines, as I have done, but sow each kind by itself distinctly. For a Scotch, for instance, comes up promptly, it is likely to get the start of the Austrian, the seed of which some- times lies dormant two or three years, and so overshadows and crowds it out. If the latter were sowed by itself, though it would be slower in germinating, all would be likely to start together, and when fairly rooted {make up for lost time. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 103 It would not be a miss to plant here and there some desirable kinds of acorns or nuts, for while the pines would grow faster and keep them down,if for any reason the pines were cut off, the oaks and hickory would come forward very rapidly when open to the sun. A few chestnuts that I have planted under the lee of other trees, have made an extraordinary growth, and in the interior, their habitat, they must be a very profitable tree to plant. You will bear in mind that I have given you my experience as aplanter of trees, much as an incident of farming and not as a business. Were it taken up as a thing of itself then it might be advisable to start seed-beds and raise one’s own trees, and nurse them, instead of importing them. I have endeavored to raise a forest about me at the least possible cost of labor, and not looking much to the hurrying of the result or to count up an early profit. The land was denuded, and exhausted, and moss-grown, and I took this method to cover it with vendure and restore it, believing that the wood would compensate me or my heirs sooner or later. * * * In closing my discursive remarks, I would say that, considering the position of my place, exposed on the northwest to the violent winds of win- ter sweeping across Buzzard’s Bay, and in summer to the strong breezes from the southwest, bringing salt spray from Vineyard Sound, the vigorous growth and promising appearance of my forest plantations is very encouraging to those more favorably placed. Not only may the destruction of our forests be partially remed- ied at a cheap cost, but the waste and sterility of our land by long cultivating and _ pasturing, be removed and replaced with fertility by the simple process of nature. It is much, also, to restore shade in summer and shelter in winter by the renewal of our forests. A committee of the Northern Illinois Horticultural Society, at a ses- sion, held in December, 1867, recommended the following list of ever- greens as suitable for cultivation in that region: For timber-belits: White pine, Norway pine and spruce, Scotch pine, Austrian pine, and American arbor vite. For high screens : Norway spruce and American arbor vite. For screens of moderate height: Siberian arbor vite, Norway spruce, American arbor vitee, hemlock and red cedar. Ornamental specimen trees: All the foregoing, and the white, black, and red spruce, Picea pichta, Cimbrian pine, Pinus mitis, Irish and Swedish junipers. Shrubs: American yew, tamarix-leaved and Waukegan trailing juniper, savin, Pinus magnus, Pinus pumilis, and Andromeda floribundi. An experimental station, begun at the Illinois Industrial University, reported, February 29, 1872, seven acres as planted with 36,749 trees, at a cost of $433.48 for trees, $106.72 for planting, and $42.83 for cultiva- tion; total, $583.03. The kinds planted were the white and green ash, catalpa, chestnut, white elm, European larch, white maple, Osage orange, Austrian and Scotch pines, white walnut and white willow. The land planted with each kind, was generally a quarter of an acre, but more with white ash and larch. Distance apart, 2 by 4 inches, except the pines, which were 4 by 4. The catalpas and white elms were all living, and but 2 per cent. of the green ash, white maple, Osage orange, and white willow died. But 1 per cent. of white walnuts, and 5 per cent. of white ash were lost. Half the chestnut and three-fourths of the larch perished, and but 2 per cent. of the pines lived. .The white grub (the larva of the May beetle) did great injury, especially to the larch and white ash, girdling the roots below the surface. The loss of the pines was attributed to dry weather.* In 1872, 10,083 trees were planted; the larches and pines from R. Douglas & Sons, Waukegan, Il., and the others grown on the premises, at Campaign. The per centages living from both years’ planting, at the end of 1872, were as follows: Catalpa and white elm, 196; white walnut, 99; green ash, white maple, white willow, Osage orange, and Norway spruce, 98; white ash, 93; European larch, Austrian pine, and white pine, 30; Scotch pine, 20; chestnut, 4. The white grub had again 104 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. done much injury, especially to the larch. It was found to be less affected on high land. The chestnuts mostly winter killed. The Osage orange was promising to become one of the most valuable trees for that latitude, and both this and the catalpa, when cut close to the ground in order to get a good, straight growth, had succeeded well. A prominent cause of failure in evergreen planting, is the exposure of the roots to the sun and air. “ We have seen hay-racks loaded with evergreens going from the nursery to the packing-house, that were dead before shipping, proving worse than a total loss of money to the pur- chasers.” The pear grafted on quince stock, has, also, led to great dis- appointment. | In making plantations in exposed situations, it will be found advanta- geous to have them of as large an area as possible, for trees will, in many cases, thrive in large masses which would actually starve in small clumps or belts. The soil should be well trenched or drained, and great care should be taken in selecting the hardy varieties that are suited to the soil in which they are planted. The plants should be small when trans- planted, and those that are known to stand severe winds, should form the margin, while the more valuable kinds are planted in the interior. In many cases it will be found judicious to plant thickly with the view of shelter, and thin early, so as to bring up the trees in a healthy and hardy state, taking girth with their height. In respect to the success that may, under good management, be expected to result from tree planting in eastern Nebraska, the following extract from an address delivered before the State Board of Agriculture, by the Hon. J. Sterling Morton, January 26, 1876, lays down his rules and mentions his results as follows: First, the original sod should be broken and turned over in thin, evenly-laid strips. When completed, a good breaking will appear like a vast floor of well-laid two inch plank painted with lampblack. Then plant and cultivate, not to see how much you can manage, but how well. Then come trees: walnuts, cottonwoods, willows, mullberries, and elms will make the home seem civilized. Tree plant- ing is an avocation which barbarians never follow. Indians never adorn their wigwams with orchards, nor indulge in floriculture. There is no record of an aboriginal horticulturist in any book I have read or heard of anywhere. It may seem a long time to raise a saw-log from the walnut which lies in the palm of your hand, but the rain and frost of winter and the sunshine of summer, together with the fertile and forcing soil of Nebraska, crowd a walnut into the dimensions of a respectable saw-log in less than twenty-five years. Upon a farm where I have lived, in Otoe county, for more than twenty years, one may see black walnut trees, which will make good railroad ties, and some which will do to saw up, which I planted with my own hands. * * * And, again, there may be found cottonwood saw-logs growing there which are more than six feet in girth, and when I first saw them they were only wandering germs, floating in the air like down from a bird’s breast. But they are adult saw-logs in 1876. These remarks, somewhat egotistical though they may be, are made for the purpose merely of impressing you, and through you the farming people, with the tree possibilities of this State, and I only preach in this regard what I have faithfully put in prac- tice, and the witnesses of the truth of my theories stand majestically verifying me all over the farm whence this is written to you, in the form of beautiful, thrifty, and valuable fruit and forest trees. Come down and see them, in the hot summer days, while you rest in their shade, even their foliage will tell you in whispering with the wind how pleasant and profitable a thing it is to plant the prairie with trees. MINNESOTA STATE FORESTRY ASSOCIATION. This, the first, and hitherto the only State forestry association within the United States, was formed at Saint Paul, January 12, 1876, in pur- FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. LOS suance of a call signed by many leading citizens of the State, who real- ized. the importance of taking effectual measures for protecting the existing timber resources of the State, and of making provision against future wants. At the first meeting, held January 11, a committee, con- sisting of Gen. George L. Becker,*Ex-Gov. William R. Marshall, Leonard B. Hodges, Prof. Charles Y. Lacy, Wyman Elliott, L. M. Ford, and Prof. William W. Folwell, was appointed to draft a constitution, which was adopted the next day at an adjourned session, as follows: Constitution of the Minnesota State Forestry Association. Articie I. This Society shall be known as the Minnesota State Forestry Asso- ciation. Art. II. The object of this association shall be the encouragement and promo- tion of forest culture by the collection and diffusion of practical information on that subject, and by the discussion of all questions pertaining thereto; to secure the general observance of Arbor Day throughout the State, and to promote the ultimate redemption of the treeless regions of Minnesota. Arr. III. The officers of this association shall consist of a president, one vice- president for each Congressional district, a treasurer, and an executive committee consisting of the president, secretary, and five elective members. Arr. IV. The president shall preside over all meetings of the society, and deliver an annual address on the subject of forest culture in Minnesota. Arr. V. In the absence of the president, his duties shall devolve upon the vice- presidents in their regular order. Arr. VI. The secretary shall record all transactions of the society; shall collate, edit, and prepare all work for the press; shall receive and answer all communica- tions addressed to the society; shall establish and maintain correspondence with similar associations, and secure by exchange their transactions, as far as possible. He shall give full and general notice of all meetings of this society, through the public press of the State. He shall report and submit to the annual meeting of the society all matter that has come into his possession, which, with its approval, shall become a part of the transactions of the society. He shall receive and_ pay over all moneys received from members or otherwise to the treasurer, from whom he shall take a receipt therefor. Arr. VII. The treasurer shall collect and be held responsible for all funds of Lge and shall disburse the same only on the order of the executive com- mittee. Arr. VIII. The officers of this society shall be elected annually by ballot, and shall hold their offices until their successors shall be elected. Arr. IX. Every member shall be entitled to copies of the transactions of the society, as often as the same shall be published, and it shall be the duty of the secretary to forward the same to each member, by mail, express, or otherwise, immediately after publication. Art. X. The executive committee may call a meeting of the society at any time and place they may deem advisable by a notice of at least ten days in the public press. Arr. XI. The society shall hold annual sessions on the second Tuesday in Jan- uary of each year, at such place as the executive committee shall determine. Arr. XII. Any person may become a member of this society by the payment of $1 to the Secretary. Art. XIII. It shall be the duty of the executive committee to prepare a pro- gramme of exercises for each annual meeting, assigning to each division of arbort- culture an essay or paper to be furnished by some member specially qualified for this service. Arr. XIV. The president and secretary shall have power to appoint delegates to meetings of kindred associations. Arr. XV. This constitution may be amended by a vote of two-thirds of the members present at any annual meeting. Under this organization, the officers first elected were, F. F. Drake, of Saint Paul, President ; A. A. Soule, of Cottonwood County (first district), Ignatius Donnelly, of Dakota County (second district), and John H. 106 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. Stevens, of Hennepin County (third district), Vice Presidents ; Leonard B. Hodges, of Saint Paul, Secretary; Pennock Pusey, of Saint Paul, Treasurer ; and Prof. C. Y. Lacy, of the State University, G. W. Fuller, of Litchfield, C. F. Dunbar, of Faribault County, John P. Schoenbeck, of Nicollet County, J. W. Blake, of Lyon County, with the ex-officio officers above named, as Executive Committee. The State Legislature, by an act passed March 2, 1876, appropriated $2,500 to promote the objects of the Association, and in order to perfect the organization and remove all doubts as to legality, it was deemed proper to reorganize under the general laws of the State, which was done in due form on the 28d day of November, 1876. The means provided by State grant, and dues from members, enabled the society to offer a series of premiums, which, although not large’ in amount, were sufficiently numerous to stimulate competition, and the objects and plan of the Society were widely published in time for the planting season of 1876. The first Tuesday of May was fixed upon as Arbor Day, and every citizen owning land was invited to devote this day especially to tree-planting. Dr. Hough says: Mr. L. B. Hodges, of Saint Paul, the Secretary of the Association in a letter dated November 29, 1877, gives the latest re- turns of operations for that year. The spring planting reported by the several township assessors, amounted to 5,268,939 trees, of which 502,568 were planted on Arbor Day. The returns of fall planting are coming in by every mail, and will come in till January. The total amount for the year 1877 cannot fall short of 7,000,000, and will probably reach 10,000,000, forest trees planted in Minnesota during the entire planting season. The returns of assessors are regarded by Mr. Hodges as very incom- plete, as it is an extra service for which no pay is allowed, and many appear to take no pains to get fullreturns. As to the proportion of these ten millions of trees that have been planted under the stimulus of pre- miums offered by the State, there are no means of knowing. We know that some would have planted without special inducement beyond self- interest. Unlike the experience of the more humid regions of the Atlantic States, timber culture west of the Mississippi has difficulties to encounter which require energy and patience to overcome. During the past sum- mer, in some ten or twelve counties of Minnesota, the grasshoppers proved very destructive to young trees, especially to seedlings. The correspondent just quoted mentions the following as within his experi- ence: In October and November, 1875, I planted 16 acres very thickly with cotton- wood and willow cuttings, ash seed, and box-elder seeds, with a few thousands of cottonwood yearlings. Nearly all from seeds and cuttings came up well, and on the first of June last that patch of 16 acres of young forest trees on the broad prairie was a beautiful sight. But during the months of June and July they were nearly all devoured by the “hoppers.” I have this fall replanted the same ground, and more too. May not grasshoppers, as well as fire, be one of the chief causes of the treeless region ? The State commissioner of statistics, in reporting for 1876, says that estimates, based upon the returns received, show that a million and a half of trees were planted on Arbor Day in 1876, and ten millions durng the season. Of these about 70 per cent. were alive and in healthy, growing condition October 15th. In noticing the results, he says: Indeed, from the sworn statements of parties competing for premiums, we as- FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 107 certain that in a large majority of instances, when the work was properly and in- telligently performed, when the ground was properly fitted up, and the necessary cultivation given at the proper periods during the growing season, that the per- centage of loss is surprisingly small—in many instances less than 10 percent. In analyzing the returns, we find a very large proportion of the tree-planting has been done where there is the most pressing necessity for this kind of work, viz., in the treeless region and the counties bordering theron. For example, Faribault County, with an area of 460,800 acres, had, at the time of the United States’ sur- vey, 20,300 acres of timber, being about 64 acres to each quarter-section, if pro- portionately distributed; enough to intice settlers into it, but not enough to last them forever. This county, realizing her necessities in this regard, has distin- guished herself by planting, as reported by assessors, on Arbor Day, 195,278 forest trees and cuttings, and during the entire season the enormous number of 1,804,777, clearly entitled her to the appellation of the “ Banner County,” as awarded by the State Forestry Association. Nobles county, with an area of 460,000 acres, had at the survey but 40 acres of timber. The assessors report in this county 121,052 trees planted on Arbor Day, and 693,343 during the season. In the south- western group of counties, intersected by or tributary to the Southern Minnesota Railroad, the Saint Paul and Sioux City Railroad, and the Winona and Saint Peter Railroad, in all fifteen counties, lying south of the Minnesota river, and haying together an area of 6,216,680 acres, and an average native supply of only 14 acres to each quarter-section, there were planted on Arbor Day 799,348 trees, and during the season 5,084,828 forest trees and cuttings, or more than half the whole amount in the State. In another group of counties, equally destitute of timber, on or near the Saint Paul and Pacific Railroad. and the Hastings and Dakota Railroad, lying north of the Minnesota river, comprising ten counties and 4,753,400 acres, there were planted on Arbor Day 279,825 forest trees and cuttings, and during the season 898,481. The assessors report over 400 miles of windbreak and hedges as planted during the season of 1876 on farms bordering upon highways. Mr. John H. Stevens, of Minneapolis, in writing to the Department of Agriculture upon tree planting in Minnesota, mentions the wliite, green, and black ash, aspen, long-toothed poplar, linden, yellow and white birch, black walnut, butternut, box elder, cottonwood, red and black cherry, elms of several kinds, hackberry, shagbark and bitter-nut hick- ories, red mulberry, several of the maples and oaks, and willows, tam- arac, and many smaller trees and shrubs, as adapted to cultivation in that State. As a rule, the evergreens had not done well, and the list of those that might be planted with much chance of success were the pine, balsam fir, swamp spruce, red and white cedar, and juniper. Mr. Stevens insists upon the thorough breaking up of the sod before planting, and advises that a hoed crop should be first cultivated so that the native sod shall be thoroughly pulverized and rotten. After the crop is removed the ground should be plowed deep and then harrowed. He would set the cuttings deep and cultivate so as to destroy all weeds and grass. He commends the white willow and Lombardy poplar for windbreaks, and the buffalo berry (Shepardea argentea) as a hedge plant. In starting the oak, he would plant the acorn where the tree is wanted, as it is not easily transplanted. In some instances he had known a cot- tonwood of fifteen years’ growth make a cord of wood. The black wal- nut and butternut are well worthy of cultivation, especially the former, which grows rapidly and is quite valuable. The locust had very often failed, but it was hoped that it might yet succeed. He is confident that tree planting may be successfully undertaken throughout Minnesota and 108 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. Dakota, and that prairie farms may be easily kept supplied with all the wood needed for farm uses and for fuel, by proper care and management. STATISTICS OF TREE PLANTING IN MINNESOTA. The eighth annual report of the Assistant Secretary of State and Com- missioner of Statistics, embracing the returns for 1876, shows the sg ing results of forest tree ee by counties: | CS s HS SN iy | <5 Ss a8 Ses ies = hee a0 =a SEE 2 on 4 SU q = oO Counties. 348 mS 4 Ags 180 g ge 2ae BS a6 a5 gee say Ss 3 2.60 fia a,” = Bos BeGer | iisleetoks neo esis ste ts Sree ache Se eee ee ee 6 169 2,724 10 BiciStone® ofa. Meine nk cece pains Sn a oe en: Se onal ae 41,200 50!S00F eeeeeee BIW 6 Rar Ghia Fo: latah Oe te, arenes arse nctnayar rere tel eee Benoit) the 113,561 | 690,868 14,457 BE OWMA eles crete ca ania d UCL RE ET. sem ane tee ce emt Cnet | 51,663 102,529 | 649,946 | 7,362 Chippewa............. Se cheer ciaietclct cee AEE Eo 9 een 24,508 105,092 242,904 1,070 La home ete ore g pate sings riac\ale eeees ee ere Roce A eae eae | 200 17,650 BERN So ssco5 Cottonwood ayer ie. stan cece c etet Metre eeey eek yas 90,020 451,201 | 5a 2215 eee Dakota ............ PaO BGRe Recomm inet aces oumaey sont oot | 236). 16,578 | 259,057 7,440 POUR LAS Hic s aspen nee Alen Sara eee Sere EIR ee ee 2,620 15,497 | 181,780 3,718 arab a ult choo ie So a ne ae cates SAL RR Bea tees 62.433 | 1,582,641 | 3,405,905 | 19,280 MlIMOre Ue eo clans we ake hoes OE er Lae 1,562 25,400 | 218,019 4,100 Freeborn 7,160 194,138 2,277,961 8,386 Goodhue nbs ne 5.427 11,279 | 711,477 11,679 Granite Esmee nn ciation: ee 8,576 77,087 | 48,957) eee een Hennepin . 2,964 6,342 41,874 280 Houston. 47 50 | 2010223 eee eee Jackson 29,238 349,565 | 1,283,022 4,521 Kan diy obins sch epesitcss sete ee ee nee eee oe eee 8,127 147,662 360,007 295 Lacsqut-Parleycicc cies cis einsroraice siren mio opera ee ate 12,743 125,678 293 5238 lee TEOISTOUB Oe esas ccc ea the cel ee eee ie eee ale ee Mcrae 1,150 536 5,250 350 MANCOlN eae e ewe hess rniaetate ta Nee = 5, oe tebeneer tes 150 _ 10,870 16,941) (perce AVON e er dack ceiome msec ergo ae ce aa eee age ctayoninais 49,553 216,931 O12:892 0 Seacrest MCLGOG acre. eieaista sere noon ere p eee ne tee cae 15,796 84,749 100,275 | 288,897 EDEN) De ae ee a oreo asica Em Oh ein ary ta) Lae aa eeee BE Se 184,677 567,697 3,226,046 8,046 IMIGEK EF mictetiis ote ee meta mes cnc etre ee ena eee! 38,641 30,276 145,260 170 1) ORR CSR ep DES BBE eHEIn ck etd ao ate Rer ere RRA tome 6.895 210,830 | 1,554,099 2,879 Murnayasy sted scone tooo e Rea gee cep MES Ve 1,955 106,193 | 180,599 ¢ INU COM Obie c meraeectatc an nero aie ee eee Oe ei ois Teehe c eee BEE 7,540 44,915 227,221 385 a0) EY Sy aoa ene ee Aig pon rN Lb SORES SY ee | 63,120 | 536,232 | 1,956,050 |........ COULTNCGEL Gedaes Hee Sea E an neon Ree anna LLANES TO. 6,645 8,679 | 299,907 9,688 Otter Tail |" 5,136 11,503 | 15,189 80 Polk | 262 100 | TSQt) ae ce oeete Pope 4.850 30,554 100,281 550 Ramsey tell 2 457 | 3,090 600 Redwood 17,671 132,613 | 403,923 1,588 Renville 16,399 182.700 | 749,710 72 Rice 10 767 | 107,075 25 Rock 22,890 466,247 | 786,320 9,604 RST) Calis, WS oo aes eG ER 5 Pda ie Sich Aba oh acai is Jo 64.612 | 122,640 383,583 1,834 SLCATNG oscil bce cae eee ese se iene ela ae eee hlome-c ere 10.247 54,802 | 122,964 742 Steeles or 6s bres Bate traraieee Sine ere ee roe ota ee ire eee 4,747 | 18,853 | 707,689 5,440 NR) IM ROSAS EE MEMICAISC Rac dot Shia. c CLOLeOMem TOC Or penscaoNcidehs Ae 16,770 116,525 | 461, O25 800 Sth hictenese'd Be iaeign Shae Ro lale init visttre ssh eee brdeirn Scares 9,060 26,910 125.932 220 MOG ae sesetrisiole veisveitciegetaios oaticite ove ue sinc eracwittsrcmeu to emeieteinioers 480 1,793 D7 AGRI ae ee Wabasha. ities .cekc ct Gola sect: Scene nem aea ieee Bias 2,855 18.778 473,460 4,507 WABECA niscenci oc nomsiie Su aetentene re nietac sola aCe pio). tenis 7,224 90,773 | 814,075 830 Weatonwanl ws ci.s cr. veren ne eg ene stele sarod etoreeistel seamless et Hes 52,649 | 210,775 953,699" 3,387 WALK tere a isarct tennis Sak dic ape nese RECO ate on Rene 3,000 4,570 | 4,786! t|iceieeieere WA MON soo iase aint crcrainrcietale wise erm soe canis ciciie be eieice sitet she 130 2.928 | 18.598 760 Vellow Medicine! ecewecsc cre os ctlee eee wiepacitete caieeleautets ste 23,746 105,766 | 237.0520 seers Oval, we ee aco lopiqnctae leis Selele eine = ieee SET lee ae 928,581 6,792,911 | 26,437,088 | 424,662 : | No returns are published from the counties of Aitkin, Anoka, Benton, Carlton, Carver, Chisago Crow Wing, Dodge, Isanti, Kanabec, Lake, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Saint Louis, Scott, Sherburne Wadena, Washington and Wright—19. The above table is from the Statistics of Minnesota for 1876, p. 85. Another table from returns made by assessors in the same epore pp. 161-181, is imperfect in many respects, but more in detail as to planting fOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 109 by townships. The numbers in some cases agree with those in this table, and at other places they largely exceed them. Tree-plantiny in Kansas—Suggestions by Mr. Kelsey. Mr. Kelsey, in an essay, read before the Kansas State Horticultural Society, December 15, 1868, from an experience of twenty years in plant- ing, of which six had been spent in Kansas, gave the results of his observation, especially with the black walnut, cottonwood and silver maple, which he preferred as best adapted for this region. In planting black walnuts, he desired they be gathered soon after they drop, and to be spread and covered two or three inches deep with moist earth, or, better, with saw-dust, to keep them moist through the winter. They should be planted two inches deep, early in spring, and with fair soil and good cultivation, they will grow so as to be of some use as fuel in five or six years, and in ten years, would make good fence-posts or rail- road ties, and begin to bear nuts. In fifteen years they would make a fine forest, and, if judiciously managed, would go on increasing in value for a century, returning fair profits annually, and without expense. It should not be transplanted, but the seed should be placed where the tree is to stand. , Cottonwood might be started from shoots of last year’s growth cut in the fall and packed in moist saw-dust, or buried in the earth till spring. They should be a foot long, and might be set with a narrow spade, leavy- ing an inch or two out, and pressing the soil firmly about them at. set- ting. Small plants with roots might be easily got; they would begin to be of service as wind-breaks and shelter for stock in four years, and the wood makes a fair fire-wood. He suggested planting cottonwood altern- ately with black walnut, to make the latter grow taller than if grown alone. Silver maple should be started from seed, which ripens from the 15th to the 18th of May, and should be sown immediately in drills, and covered with an inch of good, mellow soil. It will come up in six to ten days, and by fall of the first year, will be two feet and a half high. The next spring it should be set in forest rows, two inches deeper than it stood in the shed--bed, the earth being pressed firmly about the roots. In ten years it will be 25 to 30 feet high, and 10 to 12 inches in diameter. It forms a beautiful tree while young, and its wood is more valuable than cottonwood, being useful for cabinet-wares. Its sap will make sugar of good quality, but less in quantity than the sugar maple. It has the fault of forking, so as to make two or more stems, and, except in favor- able circumstances is not likely, if left to itself, to make a large, straight tree. Itis also split down too easily by the wind and by sleet. THE CONGRESSIONAL TIMBER-CULTURE ACT. As this act of Congress more directly concerns and affects our western prairies, and the people living thereon, than is yet generally realized, I deem it proper and useful to give in this place, not merely the act, as amended, and under whose provisions we are now workin,g but, also, a tolerably full statement and history of the whole business. I am led to this, from the fact, that so many people are constantly enquiring as to its provisions, many of whom seem, by their enquiries, to be consider- ably confused as to their duties and requirements under the act. Answers made to individual enquiries, seem to be generally forgotten nearly as soon as answered, and I now propose to furnish such informa- 110 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. tion as to save myself, as well as the U.S. Land Officers a large amount of labor that can just as well be avoided in the future. With this infor- mation generally in the hands of the people, many errors can be avoided, and much valuable time saved. TIMBER-CULTURE ACTS OF 1873 AND 1874; AMENDMENTS OF 1876 D 1877. An act entitled “ An act to encourage the growth of Timber on West- ern Prairies,” approved March 3, 1873, was designed to offer direct encouragement for the planting of trees upon the prairies. The provis- ions of this act were briefly, as follows: 1. Any person who should plant, and for ten years protect and keep in a healthy, growing condition, forty acres, (the trees’ being not more than 12 feet apart each way) upon government land, was to be entitled to a quarter-section (160 acres) at the end of the eight years, the facts to be proved by two credible witnesses. Only one-quarter of any one sec- tion could thus be granted. 2. The party applying for entry was to make affidavit before the Reg- ister or Receiver of the proper land-district as to the purpose of the entry, and must pay a fee of $10, and the prescribed commissions. 3. Upon proof that the person who has made the entry has abandoned or failed to cultivate, protect, and keep in good condition the timber, the tract was to revert to the United States. 4. Persons who have made a homestead entry, and who, at the end of the third year of residence, might have had under cultivation for two years one acre of timber, in the manner above designated, for each 16 acres of said homestead, might, upon due proof, receive his patent for said homestead. 5. Lands thus acquired were not to become liable for debt prior to the issuing of patent. Forms and regulations were to be issued by the Commissioner of the General Land Office, and penalties for perjury were imposed. This act was amended March 13, 1874, as follows: The privilege of entry was confined to persons who were heads of families, or over 21 years of age, and were citizens of the United States, or had declared their intention of becoming such. The planting might include 40 acres in a quarter-section, or 20 acres in 80, or 10 acres in 40, ora fourth part of any fractional subdivision of land less than 40 acres, but not more than a quarter-section could be entered by one person. The person making the entry is required to break one-fourth of the area to be devoted to timber within one year from the date of entry ; one-fourth part more within two years, and the remaining half within three years from the date of entry. One-fourth part of the area to be planted, must be set out in timber within two years from the date of entry; another fourth within three years, and the remaining half within four years. The same provisions with respect to spaces between trees and their cultivation and protection, that were embraced in the original act, are contained in the act as amended, except as to the time for maintenance before the issue of a atent. In case of the death of the person before the full amount is planted, his heirs are to have the option of completing his undertaking, or of receiving apatent for a part upon relinquishing their claim to the remain- der. No patent is to be issued sooner than eight years after entry, and FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. ilalg! proofs of compliance with the terms of the law are required. Upon proof of neglect or abandonment, the land becomes liable to homestead entry, or entry under the provisions of the timber-culture act, but not until the original claimant has been notified, and opportunity given for defense. The provision relating to planting by those who had already located a homestead were continued, as also, the exemption from debt before issuing of patent. The Register and Receiver of the district land-office are entitled each to receive $2 at the time of entry, and the like sum when the patent is issued. Those who had already made entries, were allowed the benefit of this act of 1874, was further amended May 20, 1876, by adding a proviso: That whenever a party holding a claim under the provisions of this act, or, whenever making final proof under the same, shall prove by two good and cred— ible witnesses, that the trees planted and growing on said claim were destroyed by grasshoppers during any one or more years while holding said claim, said year or years in which said trees were so destroyed, shall not work any forfeiture of any of the rights or privileges conferred by this act ; and the time allowed by this act in which to plant the trees and make final proof, shall be extended the same - number of years as the trees planted on the said claim were destroyed in the manner specified in this section. That the planting of seeds, nuts, or cuttings, shall be considered a compliance with the provisions of the timber-culture act: Provided, That such seeds, nuts, or cuttings of the kind, and for the purpose contemplated in the original act shall be properly and _ well planted, the ground properly prepared and cultivated ; and in case such seeds, nuts, or cuttings should not germinate and grow, or should be destroyed by the depredations of grasshoppers, or from other inevitable accident, - that the ground shall be replanted, or the vacancies filled within one year from the first planting: Provided, That the parties claiming the benefit of the provis- ions of this act shall prove, by two good and credible witnesses, that the ground was properly prepared and planted in such seeds, nuts, or cuttings, and were so destroyed by inevitable accident in such year. _ That it shall not be necessary to plant trees, seeds, nuts or cuttings in one body, provided, the several bodies, not exceeding four in number, planted by measure- ment, aggregate the amount required, and in the time required by the original and amended act. In rulings under this act. The General Land office has in some cases excepted the Osage orange, box-elder and white willow from the classes of timber that may be planted by those seeking to acquire title by tim- ber culture. We are unable to see a just reason why either of these should be thus excluded, as each of them in its proper soil and climate becomes valuable. It would be difficult to find a more precious timber for wagon-making than the Bois d’are (Osage orange) ot Arkansas and Texas; a more serviceable tree than the box-elder on some parts of the Western plains, or a better tree for screens and wind-breaks in Northern Iowa and Western Minnesota than the white willow. These rulings are not understood to have been general, and it is to be hoped they will not in any case be permanent. Some care has been taken to make personal inquiries of persons who haye had opportunities for observing the operation of the timber-culture act, and in addressing circulars of inquiry for statistical information upon this subject, the Registers of land districts were asked to state any suggestions of amendment which in their judgment were desirable, some of these are given on the following page. With respects to its present +By an act approved March 3, 1877, it'is provided, that where crops were destroyed or seriously injured by grasshoppers, in 1877, the claimant is allowed to be absent from his lands till October 1, 1878, under such regulations as might be prescribed, and if these insects reappear in 1878, a like leave is granted till October 1, 1879, without prejudice of rights. ala FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. operation, I fully concur with Hon. Leonard B. Hodges, of Minnesota, in his statement of the defects:— (Hough’s Report, p. 19.) - First. It is requiring more of the settler than he is able to accomplish. The result is, in a. very large majority of cases the law is not complied with any fur- ther than to file the claim in the land office, pay the entry-fee, and break ten acres. By this time the settler begins to realize the nature of the contract he has undertaken to execute. He now sees clearly that he is too poor to do the work asit should be done. He begins to evade the plain intent and spirit of the law in the painful economy of time and labor he can so poorly afford to expend. Not that he wishes to defraud the government or shirk his responsibilities, but rather from an inadequate realization of what must be done, and a natural desire to save what he has invested and can so poorly afford vo lose, leads him into such crooked practice as we see on nine-tenths of the quarter-sections held under the provisions of this act. Another defect in the law is in the extreme facility land can be held by parties who make the claim, with no serious intention of planting any trees, but simply to doa little breaking and take his chances in selling his interest in it, in the course of the two years he can hold it, for a profit. In this way, and aided by extensions of time, granted on account of destruction by grass- hoppers and other unavoidable accidents, large quantities of very desirable goy- ernment land is prevented from being occupied and improved by actual settlers. Thousand of acres of government lands are thus held, tree of costs or taxes, and I see no difficulty in a company of ingenious operators, doing an extensive real estate business under the workings of this act, for quite an extended and indef- inite period of time. Another defect in the Congressional timber-culture act is the clause permitting the trees to be planted “not more than twelve feet apart each way.” This is a very serious defect, and of itself virtually defeats the objects and pur- poses of the act. Nature shows us plainly how forests are grown, and it is folly on the part of Congress to evade or repeal natural laws governing the - growth of forests. Nature plants thickly, pays no regard to the permission of Congress to plant so wide of the mark as twelve feet apart each way, and succeeds. In her own way she grows more timber and better timber on ten acres than a set- tler can in the mode indicated by Congress on forty acres, and at a tithe of the expense. To illustrate: forty acres planted twelve feet apart each way must be thoroughly cultivated during the growing season of each year, until the growing trees have attained such proportions as to shade and mulch the ground. It requires the constant daily labor of the settler during the growing season from May to August. The parties sought to be benefited by the act are too poor to give so large a portion of their time to the work. The “numan necessity for daily bread” compels their atcention to the care of growing crops, upon which existence depends. It is a notable fact that thus far the only successful and genuine cases of tree-planting under the provisions of this act that have come under my notice are those where the planter has been financially able to plant closely ; say on an average of four feet apart each way. ) A forest so planted, with prompt and thorough cultivation for three years, is a success. The chief cost is terminated in three years from planting; the young trees make a straight, upright, vigorous growth ; they soon cover and shade the ground so thoroughly as to effectually prevent the growth of weeds or grass among the trees, and the annual mulching from the falling foliage keeps the ground moist and friable, obviating the necessity of cultivation, and promotes the “healthy growing condition” which the act of Congress very properly requires. On the other hand, the evasions of the law are painfully conspicuous. In many instances strips of breaking three or four feet wide, parallel with each other, are either planted with tree-seeds or cuttings, so as to bring them within the distance allowed by law. The planting is usually done in the raw sod, left without care or cultivation, smothered in rank weeds and grass, and swept over by successive prairie fires. It is difficult to employ language sutticiently vigorous in denouncing such childish folly. It is as idle to expect to grow a crop of forty acres of forest- trees without first breaking every foot, then tollowed after the decomposition of the sod by thorough plowing and repeated harrowing, as it would be to expect to grow a paying crop of corn by digging post holes 12 feet each way on theunbroken prairie and dropping the seeds therein. A modification of the timber-culture act t‘*Report of State Forestry Association,’ 1877, p. 44. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 113 requiring the settler to plant not less than 2,700 trees per acre, instead of 300, and ten acres instead of forty, would accomplish the objects contemplated by the framers of the act, and in time prove an incalculable blessing to the treeless wastes of the Western and Northwestern States and Territories. * * * The law, to be available and productive of the greatest good to the people and to the country, should be so amended as to allow all who have already made claims under its provisions to be allowed to plant ten acres instead of forty; to plant not more than 4 feet apart each way, and to be planted within four years; two anda half acres the second year; two anda half the third, and five the fourth. The claimant should be compelled to report the actual condition of his timber planta- tion annually to the Register of the land office of the districts in which the land is located. He should be, by the terms of the act, compelled to do his work in a thorough and workmanlike manner, to keep the ground well and thoroughly cul- tivated, until such time as the growth and development of the trees shall have rendered such further cultivation impracticable and unnecessary. And he should be required to fill all vacancies occurring from any cause within one year; such report to be verified by the affidavit of the claimant and also by the affidavits of two competent and disinterested witnesses, failing in which the land should be open to settlement by other parties. It is urged in objection to such modifications of the timber-culture act, that Congress never would consent to give away sixteen acres of land for the plantng of one acre of timber. Now this objection brings up one more modification, and that is to make the provisions of the act cover every quarter section of government prairie land with- in the timits of what is universally recognized as the “treeless region,” instead as now only every fourth quarter-section. This brings us along to the act we are now working under—a wonder- ful improvement over the previous laws, and a long step in the right direction. Here it is official, and fresh from the United States General Land office at Washington: AN ACT to amend an act entitled “An Act to encourage the growth of timber on the Western Prairies.” Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the act entitled “An Act to amend the act entitled ‘An Act to encourage the growth of timber on the Western Prairies,” approved March thirteenth, eighteen hundred and seventy-four, be and the same is hereby amended so as to read as fol- lows: That any person who is the head of a family, or who has arrived at the age of twenty-one years, and is a citizen of the United States, or who shall have filed his declaration of intention to become such, as re- quired by the naturalization laws of the United States, who shall plant, protect, and keep in a healthy, growing condition for eight years ten acres of timber, on any quarter-section of any of the public lands of the United States, or five acres of any legal subdivision of eighty acres, or two and one-half acres on any legal subdivision of forty acres or less, shall be entitled to a patent for the whole of said quarter-section, or of such legal subdivision of eighty or forty acres, or fractional subdivision of less than forty acres, as the case may be, at the expiration of said eight years, on making proof of such fact by not less than two credible witnesses, and a full compliance of the further conditions as provided in section two: Provided further, That not more than one quarter of any section shall be thus granted, and that no person shall make more than one entry under the provisions of this act. Src. 2. That the person. applying for the benefits of this act shall, upon aplication to the register of the land district in which he or she is about to make such entry, make affidavit, before the register or the receiver, or the clerk of some court of record, or officer authorized to ad- minister oaths in the district where the land is situated; which affidavit 114 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. shall be as follows, to wit: IL———,, having filed my application, num- ber , for an entry under the provisions of an act entitled “An Act to amend an act entitled ‘An Act to encourage the growth of timber on the Western Prairies,’” approved , 187-, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I am the head of a family (or over twenty-one years of age), and a citizen of the United States (or have declared my intention to be- come such); that the section of land specified in my said application is composed exclusively of prairie lands, or other lands devoid of timber; that this filing and entry is made for the cultivation of timber, and for my own exclusive use and benefit; that I have made the application in good faith, and not for the purpose of speculation, or directly or indi- rectly for the use or benefit of any other person whomsoever ; that I intend to hold and cultivate the land, and to fully comply with the pro- visions of this act; and that I have not heretofore made an entry under this act, or the acts of which this is amendatory. And upon filing said affidavit with said register and said receiver, and on payment of ten dol- lars if the tract applied for is more than eighty acres, and five dollars if it is eighty acres or less, he or she shall thereupon be permitted to enter the quantity of land specified; and the party making an entry of a quar- ter-section under the provisions of this act shall be required to break or plow five acres covered thereby the first year, five acres the second year, and to cultivate to crop or otherwise the first five acres broken or plowed the first year; the third year he or she shall cultivate to crop or other- wise the five acres broken the second year, and to plant in timber, seeds, or cuttings the five first broken or plowed, and to cultivate and put in crop or otherwise the remaining five acres, and the fourth year to plant in timber, seeds, or cuttings the remaining five acres. All entries of less quantity than one quarter-section shall be plowed, planted, cultivated and planted to trees, tree-seeds, or cuttings, in the same manner and in the same proportion as hereinbefore provided for a quarter-section. Pro- vided, however, That in case such trees, seeds, or cuttings shall be destroyed by grasshoppers, or by extreme and unusual drouth, for any year or term of years, the time for planting such trees, seeds, or cuttings shall be extended one year for every such year that they are so destroyed: Pro- vided further, That the person making such entry shall, before he or she shall be entitled to such extension of time, file with the register and the receiver of the proper land office an affidavit, corroborated by two witnesses, setting forth the destruction of such trees, and that, in conse- quence of such destruction, he or she is compelled to ask an extention of time, in accordance with the provisions of this act: And provided further, That no final certificate shall be given, or patent issued, for the land so entered until the expiration of eight years from the date of such entry; and if, at the expiration of such time, or at any time within five years thereafter, the person making such entry, or, if he or she be dead, his or her heirs or legal representatives, shall prove by two credible wit- nesses that he or she or they have planted, and, for not less than eight years, have cultivated and protected such quantity and character of trees as aforesaid; that not less than twenty-seven hundred trees were planted on each acre, and that at the time of making such proof that there shall be then growing at least six hundred and seventy-five living and thrifty trees to each acre, they shall receive a patent for such tract of land. Src. 3 Thatif at any time after the filing of said affidavit, and prior to the issuing of the patent for said land, if the claimantshall fail to com- ply with any of the requirements of this act, then and in that event FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 115 such land shall be subject to entry under the homestead laws, or by some other person under the provisions of this act: Provided, That the party making claim to said land, either as a homestead settler, or under this act, shall give, at the time of filing his application, such notice to the origi- nal claimant as shall be prescribed by the rules established by the Com- missioner of the General Land Office; and the rights of the parties shall be determined as in other contested cases. Sec. 4. That no land acquired under the provisions of this act shall in any event, become liable to the staisfaction of any debt or debts con- _ tracted prior to the issuing of the final certificate thereof. Src. 5. That the Commissioner of the General Land Office is hereby required to prepare and issue such rules and regulations, consistent with this act, as shall be necessary and proper to carry its provisions into effect; and that the registers and receivers of the several land offices shall each be entitled to receive two dollars at the time of entry, and the like a when the claim is finally established and the final certificate issued. Src. 6. That the fifth section of the act entitled “An Act in addition toan act to punish crimes against the United States, and for other pur- poses,” approved March third, eighteen hundred and fifty-seven, shall extend to all oaths, affirmations, and affidavits required or authorized by this act. Src. 7. That parties who have already made entries under the acts approved March third, eighteen hundred and seventy-three, and March thirteenth, eighteen hundred and seventy-four, of which this is amenda- tory, shall be permitted to complete the same upon full compliance with the provisions of this act, that is, they shall, at the time of making their final proof, have had under cultivation, as required by this act, an Se of timber sufficient to make the number of acres required by this act. Sec. 8. All acts and parts of acts in conflict with this act are hereby repealed. Approved June 14, 1878. . And now, by connecting with the amendmend law the following explanations of the changes made, together with the regulations, issued by the Department of the Interior, General Land Office, Washington D. C. Oct. Ist, 1878. We have all the information necessary for any one to enable him to fully understand his duties, obligations, and rights under the congressional timber culture act. Please study the law, the official explanations and regulations and you will then know for yourselves more than you can possibly learn by writing to any one for information on this subject. LAWS TO PROMOTE TIMBER CULTURE. The timber culture act of March 3, 1873, having been amended by the act of March 138, 1874, the latter has been further amended by the act of June 14, 1878. I.—Certain provisions of the act of March 18, 1874, are repealed by the act of June 14,1878. — 1. The act of March 13, 1874, at the close of its first section, contains the following; ‘“ Provided, That no more than one quarter of any section shall be thus granted, and that no person shall make no more than one entry under the provisions of this act, unless fractional subdivisions of less than forty acres are entered, which, in the aggregate, shall not exceed — 116 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. one quarter section.” In the act of June 14, 1878, the concluding words, — “unless fractional subdivisions of less than forty acres are entered, which, in the aggregate, shall not exceed one quarter section,” are omit- ted. Hence, the rule forbidding more than one entry 1s made universal, and will govern in all future cases. 2 The provisions of the act of March, 13, 1874, requiring that, the trees shall be not “more than twelve feet apart each way,” is omitted from the act of June 14, 1878. The latter requires, however, that the final proof shall show “that not less than twenty-seven hundred trees were planted on each acre, and that at the time of making such proof there | shall be growing at least six hundred and seventy-five living and thrifty trees to each acre.’ 3. The closing sentence of the second section of the act of March 13, 1874, provides that “in case of the death of a person who has complied with the provisions of this act for the period of three years, his heirs or legal representatives shall have the option to comply with the provisions of this act, and receive, at the expiration of eight years, a patent for one hundred and sixty acres, or receive, without delay, a patent for forty acres, relinquistiing all claim to the remainder.” ‘This provision is not contained in the act of June 14, 1878. 4. The following section of the act March 13, 1874, relating to home- stead entries on which timber is cultivated, is ‘omitted from the act of June 14, 1878: Sec. 4 That each and every person who, under the provisions of the act entitled “ An Act to secure homesteads to actual settlerson the public domain,” approved May twentieth, eighteen hundred and sixty-two, or any amendment thereto, hay- ing a homestead on said public domain, who, at any time after the end of the third year of his or her residence thereon, shall, in addition to the settlement and improvements now required by law, have had under cultivation, for two years, one acre of timber, the trees thereon not being more than twelve feet apart each way, and in good thrifty condition, for each and every sixteen acres of said home- stead, shall, upon due proof of such fact by two credible witnesses, receive his or her patent for said homestead. The rights of claimants under entries actually made according to the act of March 18, 1874, before the 14th of June, 1878, when the amenda- tory took effect, are not affected by the repeal of the provisions referred to. The parties interested, if they so elect, may consummate their entries according to the provisions of the act under which they were initiated. And homestead entries made before the 14th J une, 1878, will be patented according to the fourth section above quoted, where the facts are such as to bring ‘the cases within its provisions and the interested parties so desire. But entries made since that time must be adjusted according to the principles of the law as modified by the amendatory act. II.—The principal points to be observed in proceedings thereunder, may be stated as follows: 1. The privilege of entry under the act of June 14, 1878, is confined to persons who are heads of families, or over twenty-one years of age, and who are citizens of the United States, or have declared their inten- tion to become such, according to the naturalization laws. 2. The affidavit required for initiating an entry under the act of June 14, 1878, may be made before the register or receiver of the district office for the land district embracing the desired tract, before the clerk of some court of record, or before any officer authorized to administer oaths in that district. 3. Not more than one hundred and sixty acres in any one section can FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 117 be entered under this act, and no person can make more than one entry thereunder. 4. The ratio of area required to be broken, planted, etc., in all entries un- der the act of June 14, 1878, is one-sixteenth of the land embraced in the entry, except where the entered tract is less than forty acres, in which case it is one-sixteenth of that quantity. Theparty makingan entry of aquar- ter section, or one hundred and sixty acres, is required to break or plow five acres covered thereby during the first year, and five acresin addition during the second year. The five acres broken or plowed during the first year, he is required to cultivate by raising a crop, or otherwise, dur- ing the second year, and to plant in timber, seeds, or cuttings, during the third year. The five acres broken or plowed during the second year, he is required to cultivate, by raismga crop, or otherwise, during the third year, and to plant in timber, seeds, or cuttings, during the fourth year. The tracts embraced in entries of a less quantity than one quar- ter section are required to be broken or plowed, cultivated, and planted in trees, tree-seeds, or cuttings, during the same periods, and to the same extent, in proportion to their total areas, as are provided for in entries of a quarter section. Provision is made in the act for an extension of time in case the trees, seeds, or cuttings planted should be destroyed by grass- hoppers or by extreme and unusual drought. 5. If, at the expiration of eight years from the date of entry, or at any time within five years thereafter, the person making the entry, or, if he be dead, his heirs or legal representatives, shall prove, by two credible witnesses, the planting, cultivating, and protecting of the timber for not less than eight years, according to the provisions of the act of June 14, 1878, he, or they, will be entitled to a patent for the land embraced in the entry- 6. If,at any time after one year from the date of entry, and prior to the issue of a patent therefor, the claimant shall fail tocomply with any of the requirements of that act, then, and in that event, such entry will become liable to a contest in the manner provided in homestead cases, and upon due proof of such failure the entry will be canceled, and the land become again subject to entry under the homestead laws, or by some other person under the act of June 14, 1878. 7. No land acquired under the provisions of the actof June 14, 1878, will in any event become liable to the satisfaction of any debt or debts contracted prior to the issuing of the final certificate therefor. 8. The fees for enteries under the act of June 14, 1878, are ten dollars, if the tract applied for is more than eighty acres; and five dollars, if it is eighty acres or less; and the commissions of registers and receivers on all entries (irrespective of area) are four dollars (two dollars to each) at the date of entry, and a like sum at the date of final proof. 9. No distinction is made, as to area or the amount of fee and com- missions, between minimum and double-minimum lands. A party may enter one hundred and sixty acres of either on payment of the prescribed fee and commissions. 10. The fifth section of the act approved March 3, 1857, entitled “An Act in addition to an act to punish crimes against the United States, and for other purposes,” is extended to all oaths, affirmations, and affidavits required or authorized by the act of June 14, 1878. 11. Parties who have already made entries under the timber culture acts of March 3, 1878, and March 13, 1874, of which the act of June 14, 1878, is amendatory, may complete the same by compliance with the 118 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. reqirements of the latter act; that is, they may do so by showing, at the time of making their final proof, that they have had under cultivation, as required by the act of June 14, 1878, an amount of timber sufficient to make the number of acres required thereby, being one-fourth the num- ber required by the former acts. ; III.—The following regulations are prescribed pursuant to the fifth section of the act of June 14, 1878, viz: ey 1. The register and receiver will not restrict entries under this act to one quarter section only in each section, as was formerly done under the acts to which this is amendatory, but may allow entries to be made of subdivisions of different quarter sections; provided that each entry shall form a compact body, not exceeding one hundred and sixty acres, and that no more than that quantity shall be entered in any one section. Before allowing any entry applied for, they will, by a careful examina- tion of the plat and tract-books with reference to any previous entry or entries within the limits of the same section, satisfy themselves that the desired entry is admissible under this rule. 2. When they shall have satisfied themselves that the land applied for is properly subject to such entry, they will require the party to make the prescribed affidavit, and to pay the fee and that part of the commissions payable at the date of entry, and the receiver will issue his receipt there- for, in duplicate, giving the party a duplicate receipt. They will num- ber the entry in its order, in a separate series of numbers, unless they have already a series under the acts to which this act is amendatory, in which case they will number the entry as one of thatseries; they will note the entry on their records and report it in their monthly returns, sending up all the papers therein, with an abstract of the entries allowed during the month under this act. If the affidavit is made before a _jus- tice of the peace, which the act admits of, his official character and the genuineness of his signature must be certified under seal. 3. When a contest is instituted, as contemplated in the third section of the act of June 14, 1878, the contestant will be allowed to make ap- plication to enter the land. The register will thereupon indorse on the application the date of its presentation, and will make the application, and the contestant’s affidavit setting forth the grounds of contest, the basis for further proceedings, these papers to accompany the report sub- mitting the case to the General Land Office. Should the contest result in the cancellation of the contested entry, the contestant may then perfect his own, but no preference right will be allowed unless applica- tion is made by him at date of instituting contest. 4. The fees and commissions in this class of entries, the receiver will account for in the usual manner, indicating the same as fees and com- missions on timber-culture entries, which will be charged against the maximum of $3,000 now allowed by law. 5. In all cases under this act, it will be required that trees shall be cultivated which shall be of the class included in the term “timber,” the cultivation of shrubbery and fruit trees not being sufficient. 6. The applications, affidavits, and receipts in entries allowed under the act of June 14, 1878, will be made out according to the forms hereto attached, Nos. 38, 39 and 40. PRUNING AND THINNING. On tree-pruning, a great difference of opinion exists. You don’t want to prune your trees late in the winter, nor when the sap is flowing freely. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 119 As to the exact time when to prune, I do not attach much importance; so you do your pruning as soon as the tree needs it. When you grow a young forest, you can almost do your pruning with your thumb and finger, by pinching off the young shoots soon after they start. But, when you have neglected this, and the limbs have been allowed to have their own way any length of time, then the pruning knife or saw must be brought into requisition. In my own experience, I have found any time after the leaves are full grown, until late in the fall, is a good time enough to prune in Minnesota. I doubt if any rules can be. properly given on this subject. Your own judgment and common sense must direct you largely in this matter. For wind-breaks, very little, if any pruning is necessary. For a shade tree, you so prune as fo form a wide spreading top ; but, for a young forest, in which the growing of timber is the main object, you so prune as to get a long, straight body as free from branches as possible; and if your young forest have been as thickly planted as it should be, nature will do most of the pruning, nearly, or quite as well as need be. First, know what you want of your _tree, and then prune accordingly. You can so prune, and direct its erowth as to give it almost any shape you choose. Bryant says: “Tn pruning young trees designed for timber, the symmetry of their form is the first consideration. When taken from the seed-bed, all side-branches should be cut off; only one leading shoot should be allowed, which must not be permitted to fork. All side branches which approach in size "and vigor to the leading shoot, should be shortened or cut off entirely. Suckers from the base of the tree should be cut away.” Bryant also, says: “The best time to prune is, in my opinion, the autumn after the ‘trees have ceased their growth. The worst time to prune, is the latter part of winter, and in the spring, just before or during the first flow of sap. % ee cs Nevertheless, when trees are transplanted i in spring, they may be pruned, as they do not bleed when recently taken up. When the young trees become large enough to crowd, or materially check each other in growth, they must be thinned to one foot apart in the rows. Care should be taken to leave the str aightest and most vigorous trees. The thinning may be continued gradually, as the trees grow larger, and those cut out, used for purposes to which their size and quality are adapted.” Fuller says : “Tf the trees are properly pruned when young, there will be no necessity for taking off large branches when they become old. Too many branches must not be taken off at one time, as leaves are indispensable to growth ; but young trees ’ may produce more leaves than is necessary for a healthy | grow th, and a reduction in number may increase rather than decrease strength. * # x Pruning should not be practiced to such an extent that the tree may be eventually weak- ened or checked in growth. * * * * * * Trees, when standing alone, should have, at least, two-thirds of their height oceupied with branches. But, when grown in thickets, and for the purpose of producing timber, this rule may be reversed, and the branches occupy oa one-third, varying the rule accor ding to the natural habit of the tree.” * Fuller also, says further : “There is no better time (to prune) than in summer, after the leaves have be- come fully formed, and the tree has commenced to make a new growth. * * * *, Pruning may also be done any time in summer, fall, or early winter. * * * * * * Midsummer is the best time to prune all resinous trees.” In pruning, use a sharp knife, and make a clean, smooth, upward cut. Should the branches be too large for a knife, use a fine-tooth saw, smoothing off the wound with a sharp knife. Where large wounds are made, an application of common grafting-wax, or cow-manure when warm, will exclude the air until there will be little danger of decay. 120 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. MOUNTAIN FORESTS AND THE WATER SUPPLY OF THE CONTINENT. An Open Letter to the Hon. Carl Schurz, Secretary of the Interior, from Dr. John A. Warder, President of the American Forestry Association. Norrs Benp, Outo, January 8th, 1879. Hon. Carl Schurz, Secretary of the Interior : My Dear Srr—Observations made on a previous visit to Colorado, and again during the past season, in a journey on the Medicine Bow Range, in Wyoming, with my friend, Governor J. W. Hoyt, have filled me with apprehensions as to the future water supply of our Western rivers. The destruction of the forests by fire is a most fearful and melancholy subject to contemplate. An inspection of portions of the public domain by one who has studied the subject, and who has either read of or wit- nessed the disastrous effects of the spoiliation of the forests in elevated mountain heights, can not fail to fill the mind with the most serious apprehensions. Your efforts, my dear Secretary, on behalf of the forests are highly appreciated by those of us who have made the influence of the woods upon the water supply of our country, a matter of study. The mountains (up a certain elevation, close to the limit of perpetual congelation) were designed for the forests, nor should they ever be stripped of their aboreal covering; for, as you have well said in your report of last year, if the forests in such regions be once destroyed they will never be restored. It were a work of supererogation, my dear sir, to attempt an explana- tion or rationale of the action of the forests as receivers, reservoirs and fountains of waters, to one who is evidently so well informed in regard to forest science as yourself, whom I have been induced to suspect of having been a pupil of Ebermayer, of Bernhardt, of Judeich, of Burck- _ hardt, or some others of the magnates in Foerstwirthschaf of the Vater- land. But to return to Wyoming, and what was seen while traversing a broad plateau of the range, and passing through a glorious forest primeval—a very Uhrwald. This is composed chiefly of pines, and among them, in the lower and damper spots, the most lovely firs and spruces reared their tall shafts, clothed with a mystic drapery of depending boughs, bearing silvery green foliage of the Menzies, Douglas and Englemann spruces, and of the Grandis firs. While contemplating these noble trees, we sud- denly came upon a scene of appalling desolation. Upon atract of many square miles in extent, as far as the eye could reach, in every direction, over many thousands of acres, there was not a living tree to be seen! All, all were standing bare, stark and stiff in death, their tall, dead trunks blackened by fire, except where time had come to their relief and stripped off the bark, leaving the bare poles that stood beside the way like shivering ghosts in purgatory, waiting until the storms of years should come to their relief and prostrate them to the earth that bore them, when they would at length gradually crumble into mold to reno- vate the soil, which had been deprived of all its humus by the fierce flames. The forest is destroyed, the noble trees are dead and gone, too often, never in our time, to return and be a kindly covering and befitting garni- FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. a2 ture to these sad wastes ; nor to clothe these mountain sides with verdure. Continued and continuous desolation is their doom! Practically speaking, this is and must be so; whence can come the seed-germs for the future aforesting of such extensive tracts? Man, the improvident destructive, will not do it; the kindly winds can trans- port the winged seeds but a short distance from the parent trees; the cunning and provident squirrel has a still more limited range within which to carry the seeds he may gather, and, with wise instinct, store up for his liberal repast, from which a few might escape to germinate and form nuclei, producing at length seeds for further transportaion in the future. Ages must be required to restore these forests in the course of nature, and meanwhile the degrading agencies of every storm will be carrying away the soil and scarring the mountain sides with frightful gullies, occupied at times with violent torrents, for there is no longer any her- bage, no moss, nor brush, nor any debris to cover the surface, and, sponge-like, to absorb and retain the precipitated moisture. Yes, my good Secretary, you are perfectly right in your assertion that in these bared mountains the forests will never be restored. When thus ruthlessly destroyed, in certain situations, and over such vast areas, ' practically speaking in reference to any period of time that it is worth our while to calculate upon, any time that we or our progeny for many generations need take any account of, this is true. Prevention. But, it may be asked, can not these terribly destructive fires be pre- vented? Can not the calamitous results that must follow be avoided? Yes! Yes! They may, and they must be prevented, and that at once, lest our fair continent become a desert, unfitted for the many millions it is capable of happily sustaining upon the broad territory of her fruitful bosom. That is, indeed, a great question, requiring the exercise of a high order of statesmanship. It is truly a difficult question, but the interests at stake are enormous, and are of infinitely greater importance to this Nation than deciding who of all the great army of office-seekers shall be gratified by an appointment to this or that petty place under the Gov- ernment. Oh, that we could be blessed with a race of statesmen capa- ble of grasping such problems as this! Yes, the interests at stake are really enormous; they involve the wel- fare of the country, since they concern the very existence and perma- nence of our rivers. If neglected, will not the future explorer of the vast Sahara that may be spread from the eastern slope of these moun- tains, find, amid the shifting sands of that wide desert, only depressions of the surface, marking the ancient beds of our great rivers and their numerous tributaries, in that American Sahara, as Champollion observed them in the wastes of Northern Africa; of which hesaid: “And so, the astonishing truth dawns upon us, that this desert may once have been a region of groves and fountains, and the abode of happy millions. Is there any crime against Nature which draws down a more terrible curse than that of stripping Mother Earth of her sylvan covering? The hand of man has produced this desert, and, I verily believe, every other desert upon the surface of this earth. Earth was Eden once, and our misery is the punishment of our sins against the world of plants. The 122, FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. burning sun of the desert is the angel with the flaming sword who stands between us and Paradise.” But now shall this great work be accomplished? How shall we pre- serve these treasure houses of the snow and rain, that they shall steadily distill the streams that are to feed our rivers? ; By wise legislation, after we shall have enlightened the public upon the subject of an advanced forest science, and educated them up to a. proper appreciation .of the importance, and of the special functions of: the forests on these mountain heights as conservers of moisture, as receiv- ers and as reservoirs of the water supplies of a large portion of the con- tinent. When so educated, and fully informed upon these important truths by an enlightened public sentiment, the people will become more careful in the use of this dangerous agent; they will be more watchful of their camp fires, and will compel others to be more careful, and they will stamp out the first beginnings of a conflagration. In addition to this enlighted sentiment, and complementary to it legis- lation, will be needed to operate upon those who may wickedly or igno- rantly transgress. Some of your own excellent suggestions, Mr. Secretary, as they were incorporated in the bill of Senator Plumb, of Kansas, (Sen. No. 609,) would prove valuable as preventive measures, if enacted; especially the appointment of Forest Guards, (Forest Waerter,) in the third section, and prescribing their duties. | . Section 13 of this proposed law is one of great importance, being in- tended to furnish protection against fires on the public domain, whether prairies or timber. This is a much-needed provision, which has never before existed in the case of Government lands, though provided for by some of the States. The losses by fires are enormous, and should be prevented. We all know by sad and painful experience, how difficult at ask it is for the philanthrophist who presents a simple proposition for the public good, how great soever its importance, to arrest the attention of the pub- lic. We have also learned how almost impossible it is to reach the ear of the law-making powers, and to excite in their minds an active inter- est in such questions as are here presented; in a word, how herculean an undertaking is presented when we attempt to educate the people, and those who represent them in the halls of Congress, up to a proper and full appreciation .of such a subject as this of forestry, which so deeply concerns the public weal. More especially unpromising does such an effort appear when an at- tempt is made to impress upon their minds the absolute neccessity of keeping these extensive ranges of mountain hights in a condition best adapted to attract and condense the atmospheric humidity, to receive the precipitation, to retain it for a time, and then gradually and quickly to give off, through perennial springs, the fluid to supply the fertilizing streams, that shall fill the rivers, which are so happily and so extensively distributed over our great continent. And now, Mr. Secretary, hoping that you will excuse the prolixity which must unavoidably attend the briefest exposition of the subject, be pleased to accept the thanks of your countrymen for the noble stand you have taken in defense of our forests on the public domain; and allow an humble student of the great leaders and teachers of forest science, on behalf of his associates in the upbuilding of an American FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. ie Forestry, to beg your continuance in these efforts in behalf of the protect- ion, preservation and extention of our heritage of woodlands. Very respectfully yours, ~ JNO. A. WARDER, M. D., President A. F. A. From Pioneer Press of January 15, 1879. : TIMBER CULTURE. Annual Meeting of the Minnesota Forestry Association—A Review of the Business of the Year and Re-election of Officers. An annual meeting of the State Forestry Association was held at the capitol last evening, Mr. Ignatius Donnelly in the chair and Mr. L. B. Hodges at the secretary’s desk. Mr. Donnelly’s Annual Address. About the first business in order, was thedelivery of the annual address of the president, which was listened to with great interest by the audience. After an interesting review of forest culture in Europe, Mr. Donnelly said: One of our unsolved problems is the origin of these prairies. Some have claimed that they are due to a pecularity of the constitution of the soil, which renders them unfit for the production of trees, but this theory seems to be disproved by the fact that trees can be readily pro- duced upon them ; and that a spontaneous growth of forest soon follows the exclusion of the fires. Neither can we ascribe their first existence to these fires, for this vast region must have existed long before the In- dians could have been developed to apply the fire to the autumnal grass. As soon as this portion of the continent emerged from the condition of great lakes or lagoons and became marshes, trees must have sprung up and covered the land, and long before man appeared on the scene, with any knowledge of the use of fire, the country must have assumed the character of a densely wooded region, which no conflagration could destroy. If the soil was once denuded of its forest it would, indeed, be easy for the prairie fires, kindled by savages, to keep down the growth of young trees, and produce the state of things which the white settlers found here; but what agency could, in the first place, have destroyed the ancient forest growth, as heavy and dank as that of the everglades of the South or the pine woods of Canada? It must be remembered that the true prairie region, apart from the painless plains, is confined to cer- tain prescribed limits, viz.: “The western part of Ohio, nearly the whole of Indiana, Illinois and Iowa, the southern part of Michigan, the north- ern part of Missouri, and portions of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Kansas and Nebraska.” It would seem that either man must have existed, with a knowledge of the uses of fires, at the time the swamps of this inter-continental region were drained off sufficiently by the accretion of the soil or the rising of the continent, to produce trees; and this would be, indeed, a violent presumption; or else it would appear probable that some human agency must have swept away the forest through all this region, precisely as it was destroyed by white men, in the interest of senoulouies in Europe. si z 3 124 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. It would seem not improbable that on this continent was worked out, under the directing intelligence of the divine Architect, the greatscheme of development. The explorations of Prof. O.C. Marsh, of Yale Col- lege, in the Bad Lands at the base of the Rocky Mountains, demonstrate that in that region were originated the elephant, the rhinocerous, the tapir, the horse, the lion, the hyena, the monkey, the hog, and the camel. And it is not improbable that on this continent human civilization began. Here alone, as shown in a recent lecture of Dr. David Day, traditions are preserved by existing races of the rise of man froma brutish condition, the invention of the bow and arrow, and the first working in metal. The iron age was preceded by the bronze age. Bronze is an amalgam of copper and tin, and must have followed, prob- ably ata vast interval, the use of copper itself; and only in America do we find traces of an age when copper was used alone; and only on Lake Superior do we find copper in so pure a state as to be capable of being worked into implements without smelting; and there, too, we find vast remains of ancient mining, evidently carried on for ages by some extinct race; and in the Chippewa legends we have the traditions of the manufacture of the first copper implement. In Mexico the Aztecs had learned the art of hardening the edges of their cutting tools with tin, thus prdoucing a veritable bronze. Here then we have in unbroken succes- sion the genesis of metallurgy, stretching from the shores of Lake Super- ior to Astyri, India and Egypt. = a ‘ 5 It is a strange, but not altogether improbable suggestion, that all the prairie region was once occupied by the fields and gardens of a vast, populous, peaceful, agricultural, religious people; as numerous as the inhabitants of Egypt, in the days of the Rameses. It is well known that their monuments do not extend east of Ohio; neither do prairies. It can be supposed that thousands of years ago they were driven south- ward to Mexico and Yucatan, by savage tribes, and then began a strug- gle, which has lasted to our day, between the prairie-fires and the ad- vancing forest, the latter crowding in from north, south, east and west, and sheltering itself behind every lake and river from the tongues of flame kindled annually by the Indians. * ss ee The problem to which our people must address themselves, is how to make these mighty plains pleasant homes for human beings ; how to stop the sweep of the great winds which pour down on them from Mac- kenzie’s river and the Rocky Mountains; for homes, to be pleasant, should be built, like birds’ nests, amid the trees. If man has swept away the forests from whole continents to procure fields, surely he has genius and power enough to re-create lines of forest to protect the fields which nature, or the labors of another race, has given him. It must certainly be a harder task to lay bare of trees a thousand acres than to fence it with groves. But construction needs a higher genius than de- struction. “He who plants a tree labors for posterity,” says the pro- verb ; and some are inclined to ask, in the words of Sir Boyle Roche : “What has posterity done for me?” Hence, only the highest repre- sentatives of the highest races are equal to the task of planting a crop that will not ripen for ten or twenty years. I need not speak to you of the effects of forest-growth upon the climate of a country; with all that you are familiar. It would appear as if the movements of storms were determined by the laws of electric- ity. The tendency of showers to follow wooded hills and river courses has often been observed. i FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 125 W. W. Johnson, one of the Smithsonian Reporters, writes. from the valleys of Montana: “The showers of summer are of much more fre- quent occurrence along the mountain sides, and are always of longer duration among the timbered peaks and foot-hills, than in the lower and treeless portions of the country.” I have every reason to believe that the presonce of groves, dotting the whole extent of our prairies, would tend to equalize the fall of rain, and prevent the excessive droughs which we suffer from at certain periods, and the deluging storms which afflict us at other times. In fact, we are now in the midst of a very curious experiment, viz: the effect upon climate of the breaking up of the soil and the construction of railroads and telegraph lines. R.S. Elliott, industrial agent of the Kansas Pacific Railroad company, writes to Prof. Henry, in 1870: “ Facts such as these, seem to sustain the popular persuasion in Kansas, that a climatic change is taking place, promoted by the spread of settlements westwardly, breaking up portions of the prairie soil, covering the earth with plants that shade the ground more than the short grasses, thus checking or modifying the reflection of heat from the earth’s surface. The fact is also noted, that even where the prairie soil is not disturbed, the short buffalo-grass disappears as the frontier extends westward, and its place is taken by grasses and other herbage of taller growth. The civil engineers of this railway believe that the rains and humidity of the plains have increased during the extension of the railroads and telegraphs across them. What effect, if any, the digging and grading, the iron rails, the tension of steam in loco- motives, the friction of metaliic surfaces, the poles and wires, the action of batteries, etc.,could possibly have on the electrical conditions, as con- nected with the phenomena of precipitation, I do not, of course, under- take to say. It may be that wet seasons have merely happened to coin- cide with railroads and telegraphy.” A recent writer from Bismarck, D. T., speaking of an old settler in Montana, says: “ Clendenning is agent of all the transportation com- panies that have occasion to unload freight at Carroll. He has noticed that the water is increasing in consequence of the additional rains. He observes that cooleys, formerly dry in the fall, are now full of water. The irrigation was unnecessary this year, and the Indians observe the change. Civilization is turning Montana into a wet country.” It would appear probable, that when four broad, double bands of iron and numerous telegraph wires extend across the continent from Texas, from Omaha, from Duluth, and from Winnipeg, united at their eastern and western extremities by rivers, mountain chains, forests, and a grid- iron of other railroads and telegraphs that climatic changes may result of the most surprising character. The prosperity or the poverty of great sections may depend upon causes now but little understood. If it be true, as alleged, that earthquakes have ceased in California since the construction of the Union Pacific railroad; and if it be also true, as claimed by others, that earthquakes are electrical—the thunder-storms of the earth—what strange results may not follow when man’s enter- prise ribs all the continent with conductors of electricity hundreds of thousands of miles in length ? : If I was required to furnish a motto for our society, it would be the one word, “ Perseverance.” Only those who have passed through it can understand the long, hard, dark, continuous struggle which awaits the settler in a new country; the battle with nature, her cruelties and uncer- 126 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. tainties, on the one hand; and the conflict with his fellow-man, his greed, his cunning and his rapacity, on the other. The pioneer-farmer seems sometimes to stand alone with everything in air, and on earth making war on him; was nothing left to him but his indomitable soul. For such a man, so struggling neck-deep in distress, to plant groves, construct hedges, rear orchards and plant for posterity, requires a breadth of mind that is the highest statesmanship. And yct, I would say to all such, “Perseverance!” “The columns of our stately fortunes Are sculptured with the chisel, not the axe.” HKven the gigantic tides of the St. Lawrence have their ebb, and mis fortunes at last grow weary of submerging their victims and draw sullenly off. And then how sweet the home, snatched like a brand from the burning, won from innumerable battlings and sheltered amid arboreal beauty that shall ever increase as the days roll on. There can be no true home where.there are no trees. And so I conclude with that one word for the great army of tree-planters—‘ Perseverance.” - ; MR. HODGES TAKES THE FLOOR. After the delivery of Mr. Donnelly’s address, the secretary was called upon for a report, and he gave details as to the progress of tree-planting during the past year. He thought.twenty or twenty-five millions of trees had been planted within the last year or two. Amendments to the national timber-culture law, so as to bring its advantages within reach of the poor man, had been secured, and the results have been seen in the increased demand for tree-claims upon the government domain. The amount of tree-planting under the stimulus of the bargains offered by the association, was not as great in 1876 as 1877. The premiums awarded last year, only amounted to about $150 out of the $1,800 appropriated, a large'number of applicants for premiums having been refused, be- cause the trees were planted too far apart. In response to general inquiry, Mr. Hodges said he was engaged in the preparation of a manual. or pamphlet, on tree-culture, embodying information which was needed — by tree-planters, which he would have ready for the press in the course of a couple of months. In response to an inquiry, Mr. Hodges said the interest in tree-planting was increasing among the people throughout the treeless regions of the State. He thought the systems of premitims might be improved by adopting the Massachusetts plan of offering large premiums for the largest growers. The demand for forest-trees was so great, that it was time to take steps to increase the supply, the natural growth along the lakes and river bottoms being nearly exhausted. ELECTION OF OFFICERS. The following officers were then continued in office, by the passage of a resolution to that effect, offered by Gen. Geo. L. Becker : President—Ignatius Donnelly. Vice Presidents—Ist, A. A. Soule; 2d, J. N. Bruler; 3d, J. H. Stevens. Secretary—Leonard B. Hodges. Treasurer—Pennock Pusey. Executive Committee—C. Y. Lacy, B. Thompson, Herman Trott, Gen. J. W. Bishop, W. R. Marshall. The committee on award of premiums was continued, and the execu- tive committee were instructed to act as a committee on legislation, the necessity of which was commented upon, after which, the thanks of the FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 127 association were tendered to Mr. Donnelly, for his interesting address, and an adjournment followed. TREE CULTURE. / ee Another Interesting Meeting of the Minnesota State Forestry Association—Address of Prof. C. Y. Lacy, of the State University—Memorial to Congress for an Amend- ment to the Tree Culture Act, and Other Proceedings. An adjourned meeting of the State Forestry Association was held at the capitol last evening, with a good attendance of persons interested in the scheme for cov- ering our prairies with forest trees. Lieutenant Governor Wakefield presided, and Mr. L. B. Hodges acted as secretary. Prof. Lacy, of the State University, then read the following paper: Address of Prof. Lacy. A little more than a year ago a meeting was held in this hall, for the purpose of - organizing a Forestry Association. On the following evening another meeting was held, a constitution adopted and officers elected in accordance with it. Soon the Association numbered more than one hundred members. Before the adjourn- ment of the Legislature, the Association was entrusted with $2,500 to be awarded in premiums for tree planting. The executive committee of the Association met and constructed a list of premiums to be competed for. This premium list was printed and distributed throughout the State at the expense of the Association. The premiums have been competed for and many of them awarded. Why this conceded, extended and continued action towards one end by men engaged in the widely different pursuits of transportation, law, medicine, agricul- ture, legislation and administration? Was it to gratify the whims of a few half- crazy enthusiasts? Was it because it was easier to comply with the wishes of such in cases of doubtful utility tlan to resist their arguments and entreaties ? No. The Association includes such men as Geo. L. Becker, E. F. Drake, Herman Trott, Wm. W. Folwell, L. B. Hodges, J. W. McClung, H. H. Sibley and J. S. Pills- bury—men who have not been suspected of insanity in other affairs, men who have not time to treat individual cases outside of the insane asylum, men who have the sagacity to read the true nature of facts correctly, and the force of char- acter to say no when their judgment demands it. The Minnesota State Forestry Association was organized to meet and deal with the stern realities of facts. It was organized to meet the fact that over more than one-third the great State of Minnesota the winds rush with a howling fang and with a bitter cold that neither beast nor fruit tree can resist or withstand, and for miles not a single forest tree rears its head in protest. It was organized to meet the fact that in a climate which affords six months of winter, much of it fearfully severe, there are thou- sands of farms on which there does not grow one particle of fuel, and on which it cannot be obtained without the expenditure of both money and labor by a peo- ple often destitute of means. It was organized to meet the fact that for miles and miles there is not a single landmark to guide the benumbed and benighted traveler. It was organized to meet the fact that to induce human beings to make their homes on such farms, is downright inhumanity. It was organized to meet the fact that people cannot and will not submit to these conditions, but when undeceived will abandon their new homes and seek elsewhere. This Association was organized to deal with the fact that forests break the force and fury of winds, yield fuel and material for fencing and building, and furnish land marks _ for the traveler. It was organized to deal with the fact that forests can be grown. _ Gentlemen, these are not mere figures of rhetoric. They are solemn statements of facts which the most thorough investigation will only confirm. The force of the wind on our western prairies cannot be conceived of by you who have always lived within the area of forests. They are simply terrible to endure and appalling to contemplate. They carry death alike to the unprotected beast and the more tender forms of arboreal life. Fuel must not only be purchased at a fair price, but must be transported by rail, and often in addition it must be hauled a distance which requires a journey of one or even two days. When unexpectedly over- 128 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. taken on these broad prairies, by darkness or blinding snow, the traveler has no guide and is biable to be overcome by cold and discouragement when within a mile of his own home. It is cruel and inhuman to place human beings in the midst of such conditions. And it is not uncommon for our frontier settlers to abandon their inhospitable homes and to follow the flowing waters of the Missis- sippi to more genial climates. To show that belts and blocks of forests on every quarter section would completely change all these conditions, needs no argument. That forests can be grown, the millions of trees that have been planted in this State, and in Kansas, Iowa and Nebraska, and are now growing, show conclusively. : Thus far I have indulged in no speculation, no theory, no fancy. What I have claimed for forests no man of good judgment will attempt to question or contra- dict. But those who have given the subject most attention are firmly convinced that forests will do more than arrest the wind, modify the cold, produce fuel, yield lumber and fencing material, guide the traveler, invite the emigrant and retain the pioneer settler. I am convinced that forests will modify climate in other respects than its temperature. They will affect the rainfall. The experience of Egypt and of one of the West Indies Islands indicates this, if it does not prove it. In the former case rain fell after several million trees were planted in a district where it was never known to fall before. In the latter instance where the forests were destroyed the rains ceased to fall and streams dried up. The island was allowed to grow up to forest and the rainfall returned. Again the island was denuded, with the same result as before. Forests will preserve our springs and streams. They prevent the rain from flowing off from the surface as fast as it falls, thus producing destructive freshets, and cause it to sink gradually in the soil, thence to feed constantly flowing springs or the waste of evaporation. Forests will distribute the fall of rain more equally throughout the year. It is believed in the Eastern States that droughts are more protracted and severe than in former years when forests were more extensive. Forests will make the atmosphere more moist, more humid. With a brisk wind blowing, the air is blown away as fast as it becomes moist by contact with the earth. When the wind is arrested by forests, the moist air remains. ; Through their influence on temperature, winds and moisture, forests will help to solve the problem of successful fruit culture. The forest tree must precede the fruit tree. Plant the former and the latter will follow with comparative ease. May not fruits prove the ultimate solution of our most perplexing problem, the grasshoppers? Insects are the chief food of many birds, and birds are doubtless the instruments of Providence for keeping the insect world within proper limits. For- ests harbor and protect myriads of birds that find no suitable home upon the open prairie. The great difference in the kind and abundance of feathered life on com- ing into the vicinity of a groveis very marked. At first thought it would seem to need birds in greater numbers than-can possibly be obtained, to make any head- way. But their capacity must not be undervalued. Each small bird can consume the young grasshoppers almost by hundreds daily, and the eggs by tens of hun- dreds, and living upon them year after year, the birds would much hasten the decline and exhaustion of each migration. Besides, it is very probable that for- ests may impede the migrations of the grasshopper. I do not consider it at all unlikely that if Dakota and Nebraska had been forest instead of prairie region, the grasshoppers would never have reached Minnesota and Iowa. But the pressing need of forests in Minnesota is to break the force of the wind, modify the temperature, and furnish fuel and lumber, and landmarks. For these purposes we must have forests. These wants they can supply without a shadow of doubt or question. We must grow these forests where they do not already exist, and in our State they must be grown over a large area. Different authorities differ in their estimates of the proper proportion between forest and cultivated areas. The estimates run from 20 to 33 per cent., varying somewhat according to the distance of the country from the ocean, or other large bodies of water. Taking distance as a basis, the higher estimate would be none too high for Minnesota, Dakota, Kansas, Nebraska and Iowa; but let us take the lower estimate and see how Minnesota stands, and what she requires. Taken as a whole, and compared with some other States she does not appear to be very badly off. The census of 1876 showed 20 per cent. of the farm area in wood land in Minnesota, while Iowa has but 16, Kansas 11, Nebraska 10 and California 4. Of the. total area, 17 per cent. is estimated to be in wood land in Minnesota, while in " FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 129 Iowa it is only 14, in Kansas 53, Nebraska 5, and California 8 per cent. But it is not sufficient that there should be within the limits of the State a fair proportion of wood land. Every farm must have its protecting belt and its supply of fuel and fencing. And when we come to examine the different parts of the State we do not find the results so encouraging. We find the wood land very unequally distributed. Some counties are composed almost entirely of it. In others the government Survey does not show any, and in several others. he wood land is less than 500 acres, often lying in one piece along some stream. In one piece in the southwestern part of the State, containing 23 counties and more than ten mil- lions of acres, the government survey reported only 80,144 acres of wood land. This is thought to be double’ the true amount of timber at the present time, but if we allow that it is sufficient to supply the people of those counties with fuel for the next five years we need not further take it into account. To put 20 per cent. of this area in forest will require the planting of two millions of acres. As to the distance at which trees should stand authorities differ, but we will take such a maximum as shall raise no dispute. We will assume that they should stand at the end of ten years one rod apart each way or 160 to the acre. They should be planted then in rows not more than eight feet apart and four feet in the row, or 1,380 on each acre. : After the lapse of four or five years the necessary thinning would supply fuel and fencing. ‘his gives us at the least calculation a grand total of 2,760 millions of trees that should be planted next summer in order to give these twenty-three counties a proper proportion of forest ten years hence. If we were to allow for probable failures we should increase these figures by at _ least 25 per cent.,and if we were to allow for the requirements of other parts of the State, we should increase this result by at least 50 per cent. The numbers already given are sufficient, however, to show the magnitude of the work before us. Humanity requires us to do this work, for to invite the emigrant to our treeless prairies iscruel inhumanity. Public policy requires us to do this work, for, with- out it the treeless regions will remain uninhabited, or else their inhabitants will continually require the bounty of the State. Humanity, public policy and the magnitude of the work all demand that we each and every one of us give it our best encouragement and our best assistance. What encouragement have we? In the first place we are assured that the planting of trees will accomplish what we seek to accomplish—they will protect from winds, modify the temperature, yield fuel and lumber. In the second place we have good reason to believe that numerous other good effects will follow, that the rainfall will be better destributed, our springs and streams preserved, the air rendered more humid, fruit culture facilitated and destructive insects checked. In the third place we know that trees will grow on our prairies if properly planted and protected. It was formerly believed, because nature had not per- mitted them to grow, that trees would not grow on our prairies. This the num- erous artificial groves scattered all over the States of Kansas, Nebraska and Iowa, as well as our own experience here at home sufficiently refute. In the fourth place we are not pioneers in this business of forestry. Foreign governments long ago and very generally took measures for the preservation of their forests. France, Germany, Russia, Egypt and other countries have planted forests by the thousands of acres. There government actually does the work. Here government is only asked to encourage what is so manifestly for the advan- tage of the people. The people of Iowa, Kansas and Nebraska have led the way, and now have groves of trees ten inches in diameter and forty to fifty feet high. Minnesota has already began the work and planted so many trees that, were it not for the vast necessities, it would seem that enough had been done. The assessors’ returns of last summer show, in the twenty-three counties above named, more than thirty-two millions of trees planted and growing. This num- ber might be greatly increased, perhaps doubled, without exceeding the truth. In either case the number is large, but how small compared with the 2,760 mil- lions that need to be growing. The number is large enough to show that side by side with the most wonderful torpidity and unbelief,some people are alive and ‘wide awake to the necessities and the possibilities of this great region. The number is large enough to show that we have only to keep the ball in motion to produce grand results—to show that our encouragement and assistance will not be tendered in vain. In the fifth place the growth of these trees on our prairie soils is rapid, and 130 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. even small. plantations produced material results in a very few years. It used to be taught that he who planted trees planted for posterity. But the skillful modern cultivator plants trees for himself as well as for posterity. Fruit trees yield fruit in two or three years from planting. Forest trees rear their heads from 25 to 40 feet in the course of five to ten years. The few trees planted around a dwelling for shade and ornament soon make the winds seem not to blow as they did before’ the trees were planted. Ten acres properly planted to forest trees will in five years more than furnish the fuel and fencing necessary to furnish a large farm. In the sixth place, while the planting of trees is a long investment compared with the sowing of wheat and other like crops, there is no danger of its being a. losing one. Properly planted on good prairie soil the trees are almost certain to erow rapidly. There is no serious danger to be apprehended from insects. The demand for wood is in no danger of being cut off or even seriously diminished. Many claim that large profits will accrue, and while I do not doubt the fairness of their statements, I am content to claim that there can be no loss. In the seventh place we know that to plant a few trees is not so vast an under- taking as is generally supposed. The experience of the past year bears directly upon this point. We have the statements supported by affidavits of several men who planted on last Arbor Day more than 2,500 reoted trees, and of two at least who planted 5,000 or over. We have the statements similarily verified of more than a dozen men who planted last Arbor Day upwards of 7,000 cuttings, four of whom planted more than 10,000 each, and one of whom planted 15,411 cuttings, of which more than 13,000 were liviny trees in October. We have the varied state ment of a boy only 14 years old who planted on Arbor Day 7,500 cuttings. But what, it may be asked, have we to do with this matter? We don’t live in the treeless regions. We don’t suffer from violent winds, bitter cold or trackless wastes. We can get plenty of fuel and of lumber at reasonable prices. Why should we trouble ourselves to consider this matter? I answer, that we are a part of this great commonwealth. So are these treeless regions and their inhabitants. Our happiness, our reputation, and our continued prosperity do not depend alone upgn our little home circle, but they depend upon the condition and prosperity of the entire State. We cannot be happy while our fellow citizens are enduring the pangs of cold and hunger. We cannot enjoy a good reputation while any part of our State bears a stigma. We cannot continue prosperous when the tide of productive labor if turned toward more genial climates or toward those States which show more concern for the happiness and welfare of their people. Thus it is our duty as well as our privilege to encourage this thing by showing the faith that isin us, to assist it by imparting information to those who seek it and will use it; to encourage and assist by such other means as may lie within our power. Many of you are legislators. It is your duty to keep a watchful guard over the interests of your own district, but still more your duty to study carefally the interest of the entire State. It is for your judgment to determine how much _you shall encourage this great interest of tree planting by official act. Monarchial governments actually perform work of this kind. It is the duty of republican governments to encourage the people to do it. Many States have already taken measures to this end. In Massachusetts, with but two counties having less than 15 per cent. of woodland, a premium of $1,000 has been paid for the best grove of forest trees ten years old. In New York, with but three counties having less than 12 per cent. of woodland, bounties are paid to encourage this object. Missouri, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska and California, are also encouraging tree planting, by the payment of premiums. The Legislature of Minnesota at its last session appro- priated $2,500 for the encouragement of tree planting, and does not the planting of ten millions of trees last season justify the act? Itis the policy of good goy- ernment everywhere to do or to encourage that which is for the good of its people. The people and the State of Minnesota can do nothing that will be fraught with greater or more lasting good than the planting of trees. In the prairie “counties it is the prelude to increased production and to successful fruit culture. It is the prelude or accompaniment to successful settlement. Nor will all the advantages of tree planting be confined to the prairie counties. But few agricultural counties in the State have over twenty per cent. of woodland. It is almost certain that the productive capacity would be greatly increased by raising the proportion to’ 20 or 25 per cent. Dr. John A. Warder, of Ohio, President of the American For- estry Association, advises the farmers of that State to plant 25 per cent. of their farms in forest, believing that the remainder will produce more than if the entire area were cultivated. A nurseryman of New Jersey says that within the shelter FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. es | of evergreen belts that had been allowed to grow up to a height of 25 to 30 feet in his nursery, farm crops and crops of nursery trees averaged 50 per cent. better than when not so protected. Other examples of the same kind might be named, showing that while the prairie counties need tree-planting the most, they are not the only ones to profit from it. The fact is that the natural forests are vanish- ing so fast under the increasing demands of a fast-increasing population, that the | whole nation must sooner or later turn its attention to tree planting. But the planting of trees is not the only measure by which the treeless region is to be redeemed. Stop the prairie fires and groves of trees of greater or less extent will spring up and grow of themselves. Probably fire has done more than any other agent to preserve the prairie, and when fire and cattle are restrained trees are not long in making their appearance. Require the owners of stock to take care of it, and you relieve these natural groves from another enemy. You relieve our present forests from a great drain made upon them for fencing mater- ial, and you facilitate the act of planting because you permit the settler to do it at once instead of incurring first the labor and expense of fencing his tract. Other Proceedings. The Secretary read a communication from the Lac qui Parle Agricultural society asking for a change in the Congressional tree culture act so that ten acres of trees instead of 40 acres shall be necessary to secure claims of government land, and requesting the co-operation of the State Forestry Association to secure the amendment required. Numerous good reasons are given for the proposed improvement. ’ Mr. Hodges, in a few remarks commended the soundness of the theory of plant- ing forestry trees closer together than is required by the Congressional law, and gave his own experience on the subject of tree planting. He claimed that more good results will follow by planting trees four feet apart, than by placing them twelve feet apart, as is now required by law. Gen. Bishop took asimilar view, showing that a great deal of fraud was perpe- trated under the present law, and that it did not work well. He endorsed the ten acre plan, and said there was as little sense in planting corn twelve feet apart as to plant trees at the same distance. The General furnished a good deal of valuable information on the subject, and his remarks were listened to with great interest. The association approved a Congressional memorial to Congress to this effect, and Mr, Donnelly was requested to present the matter to the Legislature. Gov. Ramsey suggested that in view of the lateness of the season, that our members of Congress should be communicated with at once. On motion of Governor Marshall the Secretary of the Association was instructed to forward the resolution to Congress. Colonel Crooks thought that the Legislature would promptly act on the premises. A report of the committee to whom the matter was referred recommended that the Legislature should appropriate $300 for the services of the Secretary for the year 1877. As the Secretary worked last year for nothing, Mr. McClung moved that the Legislature be requested to allow the same salary for last, in view of the fact that over ten millions of trees had been planted under the supervision of the Secretary, while a considerable balance of last year’s appropriation remains unexpended. On Motion of Hon. H. M. Rice, General Bishop and the Sccretary were instructed to prepare the memorial to Congress in such a way as to make it apply as far as practicable to those who have already commenced tree planting as well as to those who may commence in the future. An appropriation of $2,000 is asked of the Legislature for the premiums and other expenses of the association for the year 1877. - ) 132 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. FOREST CULTURE IN MINNESOTA. Extracts from an Essay Read at the Annual Meeting of the State Agricultaral Society at the State University, in Minneapolis, February 5th, 1879—By Leonard B. Hodges, Superintendent of Tree Planting, First “Division St. Panl & Pacific Railroad Company. * * * * * * = * * * * * A large volume concisely written would fail to do justice to the sub- ject, and I crave your charitable conslderation while presenting a few of the most prominent points suggested in its practical bearings upon our material interests. While the northern and northeastern portions of Minnesota are emphatically timbered regions, the southwest and western portions of our State are very destitute of timber. While Minnesota as a State is more abundantly supplied with timber than either Illinois, lowa, Kan- sas, Nebraska, Nevada, Dakota or California, yet the subborn fact exists that nearly or quite one-third of the finest agricultural lands of Minne- sota are absolutely too destitute of timber to admit of settlement and cultivation. Hence the propriety of the State Agricultural Society tak- ing hold of this subject, and rendering such aid as the magnitude of this interest demands. In the proper presentation of this subject, it becomes neccessary to introduce facts bearing upon timber consumption as well as timber culture, that the general knowledge of our present necessities may enable us to make suitable provision against approach- ing want. Many of us have been permitted to witness within the last twenty-five years an increase of population from about 5,000 in 1850 to about 600,000 in 1875. Estimating five persons to a family, Minnesota now contains 120 000 families. To provide one family a comfortable degree of warmth throughout the year, requires twelve cords of wood. This one item of fuel for the household demands an annual consumption of 1,440,000 cords of wood. We have in Minnesota, in round numbers, say two thousand miles of railroad, with 230 or 240 locomotive engines, consuming annually, with the necessary supply to railroad stations, not less than two hundred and twenty thousand cords. The 5,000,000 ties entering into the original construction of our 2,000 miles of railroad, used up not less than 240,- 000 cords, and as they have to be renewed as often as once in seven years, here is another annual consumption of nearly 35,000 cords. .When we also take into account the bridge timbers used in ‘the construction and maintenance of our railroads, and the timber required for the con- struction and maintenance of the necessary station houses, warehouses, fences, &c., we can add another annual item of not less than 15 000 cords. When we take into account the consumption of timber in build- ing our cities, towns and villages, and the amount consumed in fencing the sixty thousand farms in Minnesota, we are just beginning to get fairly into the merits of the question. Let us recapitulate a moment. Cords. Poritousehold fuels si eeaeweere ec Gere teae eae aeeenne ee ee » 1,144,000 Horlocomiotives, Wes.,../20 acct as). sae eee chee Seen een ace 220,000 Nor repairing railroads, cl icant us. ss ccs te See ee 50,000 Totals’... .Jcseucelos ont ecible cedgtease> «ls bdecansMeMen woke by sll skit title Mmmm en mua FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 133 Estimating our timbered lands to yield an average of 23 cords per acre, which I consider a liberal estimate, we find that about 75,000 acres of the forests of Minnesota are being stripped annually for our house- holds and railroads alone. For fencing our farms, bridges for public highways, manufacturing purposes, the operation of our lumbermen who furnish the material for building our towns and cities, not only for Min- nesota, but to a large extent for lowa, Nebraska, Dakota and Manitoba, no one will quarrel with me, if at a rough guess I place this consump- tion equivalent to the annual stripping of another 75,000 acres. Hence I have some reason from the above approximations, to infer that the annual consumption of timber of this State is equivalentto the destruct- ion of one hundred and fifty thousand acres of the primeval forests of Minnesota every year. The geographies in use in the public schools of Minnesota say its area is 83,531 square miles. Our Commissioner of Statistics estimates our forests to cover one-sixth of our area. From _ these data you can figure how long our mooi: will hold out with our present population. — Twenty-five years hence, with a malo or more of population, our pineries exhausted, the Big Woods pretty well thinned out, the Missis- sippi drying up, St. Paul and Minneapolis three or four hundred miles above the head of steamboat navigation, mereury 40° below zero, and the wind blowing a hurricane, is not the idle revery of a dreamer. Destroying one hundred and fifty thousand acres of forest annually, and planting to supply this loss—how much? Can this society answer? Can the State of Minnesota? If you can, the answers are in order now, for even now the grasshoppers has become a burden, and the mourners go about the street; the frontier settlers of our treeless regions are twist- ing up prairie erass for fuel, burning prairie sods, and erubbing out old stumps and roots, doing their best to extract sufficient warmth there- from to prevent their wives and little ones from freezing, alas! not always succeeding. The honest farmers with loads of our great staple on their way to the nearest market, overtaken with the pitiless storm and frozen to death, without a tree or bush or shrub in sight; our public highways and railroads blockaded, travel suspended, the mails stopped, commer- cial and other great interests embarrassed. Though the kindness of our worthy Secretary, I am enabled from official date in the United States Surveyor General’s office, to lay before you some artistics which are both “interesting and instructive.” Estimates of timber in the following counties, from plats on file in the United States Surveyor General’s office, St. Paul, Minn.: Counties. Acres timber. Reel e Nace eat), 64 aR mh Whee oN dalek obra e LEE nah : 700 Nobles Pn eset ee hs FASS ook aero c SIEM w 4URLA, [ions Saha beneautes AO ie nabhian tes ey petra en est ee emietaive ele ncee thse. sletsp. Gre Aokewcasoeseieened! 2200 DH canto et UNG seme me sees Foe patetopeh buchen daa tee Vewelesd. Moet bel askbarte . 20,300 | PAN SYS) (S10) OL OAB REO RAS eS A Rr sen ES BSE, 35.0 EIS. Sneek ee hake 00 PN IoineNeca yangaee ta see snst=oket ash stacyemalcldaee sos A Aidlelstans d oda h wie aietikhedss 850 ClnuLoOMWOmGeemayteecth access eent eedaes oe Sanne GhGul. « OS eeR 50 Yat MIVA AEE sou dos eee eee ee L828 sate bias Suabsmanec castes). 2,800 HRea een Wats STORRS neha nftalsis Rie ntmuneee chs « sclatytded sits stented tome teans. 22,400 Riles 8 See reer so)? 52 se CRE MEREES ois asia SIA cad lato RNAS A 2,800 Hite SIMA) OO Oley PORE RErE Nas Sawicvewcatt 5, RietMaN Sansa «cia SeRRIES a MeROSE goo = 2,000 *This probably includes both Lyon and Lincoln counties. 134 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. ‘Yellow. Medicine, 2p. 3. (tcc. x 0.. detente one dete Senet eae ne ee 1,500 Boenvilhe p25 soso ndacepepn le Se +p -e'v aint Boece 2s VERE ee OnPR coeree 4,000 Lac qui Parle..... 2,200 Chippewa ........ 3,020 Big SOME... ste she cn ncpee ox teeg oe vpie cig Ss one cabeee Ae ee ee ee 495 SWilts i Sckptecay. seeat sinc So seis facie Oe aReeesoht os oa Le Ne CL eee een as 1,470 TRAV ELSE 2% fede. cvssseceeis) see cheoee eres: aecce Se ccrae Sonat aan eae 00 POPC eistass, tis ise dusvinsting dercesh ree etece cis cele bck See cep er oeaa eek tee eee 13,500 SUC MEMS esti cece Cleat Msc oe eee een GELS Sete eeRIE Lae AtCLy a (hi MOR nese aa 686 Garam 45. 2. 0 2.0 dai os Loe See ueeete ae dete oe EER eae oe ae 373 Waa 708. 203 awk o Bae oe eae ea IT ge Oe Gla ea a 260 Om sted jos.53 55 oie olete Bie coed peice vel eaten nese te aman Mccann 170,000 I have placed Olmsted county in this list for the purpose of illustra- tion and comparison. This county, named for my highly esteemed and lamented friend, Hon. David Olmsted, one of the founders of Minnesota, was settled in 1854, and organized in 1855. Its total area is about 422. 400 acres. Its timber area, at the time of its government survey in 1853 and 1854, was estimated by the government surveyors at 170,000 acres, being about 64.4 acres of timber to each quarter section. Like the State, this county is abundantly supplied with timber, but it was not conyeni- ently distributed, the northwestern and southeastern portions being heavily timbered on the Zumbro and Root rivers, with all the deciduous varieties, while the river bluffs were in many places heavily timbered with white pine and red cedar. The intervening area was mainly prairie, with occasionally a small grove, and patches of hazel, wild plum, cherry, crab-apple, jack oak and aspen brush. The old Dubuque and St. Paul stage road scarcely encountered a stick of timber from intersection of the northern boundary of the county until it struck the Root river timber near its southern boundary, with scarcely any timber in sight. It was a common remark of the stage passengers that this portion of Minnesota would never be settled, and in answer to this remark made in the winter of 1854 and 1855 by a well-known, wealthy and influential gentleman, then and yet a resident of St. Paul, that we would have 10,000 people in there within ten years. I got the sneering reply that we would have 10,000 fools if we did. To-day 20,000 people occupy that region; the largest, most expensive and mag- nificent school house in Minnesota—if not in the United States—stands within a few hundred yards of what was then the most desolate and lonely point on this portion of the old stage road, and is occupied by more than one thousand children who reside within rifle shot of this school house, and the fools are not all dead yet! Olmsted county has probably the largest proportion of cultivated land to its area of any county in Minnesota, and yet a large proportion of her heaviest farmers haul every stick of their fire-wood, fencing and building material, from ten to twenty miles. With good roads they make a trip a day. On the. eastern borders of the treeless region it takes the farmer two days to get load of fire-wood; while a hundred miles from any timber to amount to anything, the farmer can purchase fire-wood, seasoned hard maple, of some of the railroad companies, cheaper than the same quality of wood could be had in St. Paul, Rochester or Stillwater. Wilkin county has a larger area than Olmsted county, and with a reasonable supply of timber, would in a few years be as densely settled FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 135 and contribute as much revenue to the State. Yet should the present population of Olmsted county be suddenly transferred to Wilkin county, they would burn up every stick of fire-wood in that county in less than thirty days of such weather as Minnesota has experienced within the last month. . If they were transferred to Nobles county, they would con- sume the timber of that county in less than a week; or, if transferred to Pipe Stone or Traverse, they would consume the last stick of wood in those counties in cooking their first meal of victuals. Olmsted county, with an annual production of about two million bushels of wheat, and other agricultural products in proportion, has not yet reached more than half way to her maximum product, but a trifle over one-third of her total area having yet been placed under cultiva- tion. Twenty-five years hence, when fully developed, she will support a population of 40,000. Olmsted county pays into the State treasury over $20,000 per annum. West of Olmsted county, on the same line of railway, out in the treeless region, we strike Lyon ‘county. Just as good soil, capable of producing as much wealth, yet with less than half an acre of timber to a quarter section of prairie, has nearly reached her limit of population and wealth. Lyon county contributed in 1873, $628.91 as her quota to the State treasury. The same instructive comparison could be made with 23 other treeless counties. It would take all the timber in Lyon county to run Olmsted county eighteen months. Does the State desire to see those treeless counties able to contribute $20 to the State treasury where they now contribute one? The State extracts about $20,000 revenue per annum in State taxes from those most destitute counties of the treeless region; returns it all as soon as.collected to keep the inhabitants from freezing to death every winter, besides contributing twice as much in provisions ‘and seed wheat to keep them from starving, and yet so far, refuse through their Legisla- lature to appropriate a dollar to the only project which will ever redeem those treeless counties from virtual pauperism, and place them in,a con- dition which will enable them to subsist upon the fruit of their own labors, and also pay their just quota to the revenues of the State. A member of the Legislature should remember that he is not only the representative of his own local district, but equally so of the State at large, and while vigilantly guarding and promoting the interests of his own immediate locality, should employ the same energy and vigilance in promoting such interests as contribute to the ge mneral wellfare of the State. The State has also a direct interest in the improvement and conse- quent developement of this treeless region, for she owns in fee simple not less than seven hundred thousand acres of choice agricultural lands, in a region so destitute of timber as to render them practically worthless. As Minnesotians we are indignant, and justly condemn the selfish policy of non-resident land holders, “who, "doing nothing themselves to enhance their value, yet reap a profit on such inv estments, through the toil and privations of our hardy pioneers. As a great landed proprietor, the State owes it to herself to mark out, pursue and develope a system of forest: tree culture which will, in a few years, render those lands valuable, and consequently saleable. Hvery dollar judiciously, intelligently and hon- estly expended on such a system would come back to the State treasury in a few years with increase “an hundred fold,” like the seed we read of 136 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. “sown on good ground,” for it is emphatically good ground to plant trees on. The ready sale of lands thereby accruing, would in a comparatively short time double our school fund, liquidate our State railroad bonds, and bridge our streams. The State revenues would indirectly be so augmented as to reduce our State tax to less than one mill on a dollar, returning to the taxpayers of the timbered districts tenfold for their temporary advances. Agriculture, pre-eminently the great interest of Minnesota, the founda- tion and support of all other interests, would thereby be enabled to so spread itself that this treeless region, now dependent on the bounty of the State for “seed wheat,” would in a short period be enabled not only to return it “with usury,” but would also be able to add more than a hundred millions of bushels of wheat to our exports annually, with a proportionate increase of horses and cattle, butter and cheese. Every consideration of sound policy, enlightened statesmanship, com- mon sense and practical humanity, urges the State to the prompt inaug- uration and rapid execution of such a comprehensive system of forest tree culture, as will render such results possible. That the State partially recognizes the importance of forest-tree culture is apparent, when we refer to the legislation already had in this behalf. But, it is only a step in the right direction. Such additional legislation should at once be had as to render operative the acts already enacted. The State should at once organize a tree-planting department, and ap- propriate such a sum of money for its operations as to enable it to accomplish such results as could be reasonably expected under a faith- ful, practical, intelligent and honest administration of its affairs. This society should awaken to a full sense of its duties in this behalf. In the exercise of its appropriate and legitimate functions, the general public expect it to lead off in the promotion of agricultural interest. Any plan having for its immediate object the promotion of such inter- ests, is entitled to its hearty co-operatiou and continued aid, or least, a fair trial. * * * * * * * * The peculiar weakness of human nature, to be in haste to become rich, continually acts as a drawback to the sure, but gradual accumula- tion of wealth. The young man of enterprise, industry and ambition, is generally in too big a hurry, for permanent success. The profits on a quarter-section of wheat, with its speedy returns in ready money within a year or two from the commencement of his work, is more alluring than the slow accumulations through stock-growing and tree-planting, and their consequent permanent values. The too common, but mistaken idea, that it takes too long to wait to get any good from tree-planting, must be corrected. . Right here, I propose to challenge the present prevailing sentiments and opinions about tree-planting, by a few assertions, which, if false, can be readily disproved, and if true, will be of permanent value to this State. Ist. I assert that the farmer, on the bleakest portion of our treeless regions, can, with less ready money, than it would cost to buy a break- ing plow, surround his stock-yard and buildings with a wind-break within five years, that will protect him as effectually as though he was in the middle of the Big Woods. 2nd. That a crop of trees can be grown as surely, and in proportion to its value, with far less expense than a crop of corn. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 137 ard. That ten acres, properly planted to timber, and properly culti- vated, will, in five years supply fuel for a family in great abundance, and also, fencing for the farm of 160 acres. Ath. That the most worthless lands of our treeless regions, can, through the intervention of the Tree-Planter, be sold for $100 per acre, within twenty years. 5th. That the nett profits on a quarter-section of prairie, properly prepared, planted and cultivated with forest trees, will, within ten years exceed the nett profits of ten quarter sections of wheat. 6th. That a single cottonwood seed, although smaller than “a grain of mustard,” can, by intelligent cultivation be developed into a cord of fire-wood within twenty years. 7th. Thatany young man of muscular development and good “horse sense,” can surely accomplish these results; providing, always, that he is not in too great haste to get rich ; and 8th. That the genuine white willow, properly handled, will increase faster than money at interest. at four per cent. per month, and that the First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific railroad company is now pre- pared to furnish it to settlers on their lines, delivered at any station on the prairie free of transportation, at a cost from one to two dollars per thousand trees. These may to some sound like bold, reckless, and, perhaps, ignorant assertions, but they are hereby made, and I propose stand by them. toWe will now consider a few facts about the Growth of Forest Trees. I bring forward only Minnesota growths as specimens of what has already been done.. We have no occasion to draw from other States for facts for the encouragement of forest-culture. From many hundreds of similar facts, I select the following as sufficient: Cottonwoods, in Olmsted county, seventeen years old, are from 450 to 60 feet high, and from 60 to 81 inches in circumference. Cottonwood, in Dakota county, seventeen years old, are over sixty feet high, from 81 to 90 inches in circumference, and will yield a cord of fire-wood per tree, and are now standing on the farm of A. E. Messenger, Esq. Basswood are now standing on timber land cleared by the writer, in 1857, in the town of Oronoco, Olmsted county, 30 feet high, 25 inches in circumference. Ash, on same ground, 13 to 21 inches in circumfer- ence, 25 feet high, 10 to 12 years old. Butternut, 15 inches in circum- ference, 25 feet high, 14 years old. Pignut hickory, 15 inches in circum- ference, 25 feet high, 10 to 14 years old. This is on ground cleared from 10 to 18 years ago, and left to the care of nature ever since. On “grub prairie,” in the village of Oronoco, where the grubs did not average two feet high, and nothing but oak to be seen twenty years ago, now stands a grove from which I select jack-oak trees 20 to 26 inches in circumference, and 25 to 30 feet high ; white-oak trees, 21 to 23 inches in circumference, and 20 to 30 feet high ; butternut, 27 inches in circum- ference, and 25 to 30 feet high. All this without any cultivation, no protection from cattle, but pretty well protected from fire. ts In the door-yard of John K. Kepner, Little Valley, Olmsted county, black walnut in bearing, 7 years old, from seed, 3 to 5 inches ‘in diam- eter, 18 to 20 feet high; elm trees, 6 years from seed, 2 to 4 inches in diameter; scarlet maple still larger; box elder, larger yet, and cotton- 138 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. woods, twice as large as the box-elder; honey locust rather slow grower, — but hardy, only one in fifty having killed during the hard winter of 1872-8 ; white pine 20 feet high, 6 to 8 inches in diameter, transplanted from the forest, seven and eight years ago, when only a few inches high ; Balsam fir, 233 feet high, 38 inches in circumference, one foot above the ground, 12 yeaars old. the branches covering a circle of more than fifty feet.” On the farm of Hon. Dwight Rathburn, Fillmore county, black ash, seven to eight years old from seed, 18 to 21 inches in circumference, 18 feet high, with beautifully shaped tops 15 to 18 feet across. In door-yard of Gen. Gorman, St. Paul, tameracks transplanted from the swamp eighteen years ago, 30 to 35 feet high, and 24 to 34 inches in cir- cumference—large enough for railroad ties. Sugar maple, on Dayton avenue, St. Paul, 28 to 26 inches in circumference. On the farm of Harrison Waldron, of Byron, Olmsted county. white willow, 41 inches in circumference one foot above the ground, and 40 feet high, eight years from the cutting. Mr. G. N..Waldron, in the same vicinity, has white willows of still larger growth. At Winona, bass wood, planted in 1859, 20 inches in circumference ; hard maple, same age, 16 inches in circum- ference; soft maple, planted five or six years later, 28 inches in cireum- ference ; elm, planted in 1859 or 60, 54 inches in circumference ; cotton- wood, planted in same row at same time, 78 inches in circumference. These results, gratifying as they are, might have been materially ncreased by better cultivation, some of the trees having received no cultivation, and many of them but little. Besides the destruction of forests in Minnesota caused by the constant demand for fuel, fencing and building material, the destruction caused by the ravages of fire, and the depredations of horses, cattle and sheep, is scarcely less. This loss is almost wholly unnecessary, and as the result of sheer negligence our annual losses, without any equivalent gain, are immense. I am indebted to the courtesy of Col. Griggs of St. Paul, for the following item of fuel consumprion in St. Paul, which can be relied upon as a very close approximation, based upon purchases and sales of the wood and coal dealers in St. Paul for 1874: WOO ds eo ea «ik eases ue agate tg eee cee re tts URE Rem eaten ee 40,000 cords 001 eM Risa el ape ara acl, 0 ahaa he smi ea . 20,000 tons. Reducing coal to wood—one ton of coal equivalent to one and a half cords of wood—gives 70,000 cords of wood as the actual consumption of St. Paul for 1874. As this is nearly all the best quality of wood, chiefly sugar maple, to reduce it to the average grade of our forests would swell the measurement to about 96,000 thousand cords. Population, say 40,- 000; number of families, say 8,000, equals twelve cords to each family, thus verifying my original estimate of twelve cords per annum to an average family, of average wood. It may be objected by some that my estimates are erroneous, because I do not wholly embrace the amount of coal annually consumed in Minnesota. This is a point worth raising. If Minnesota is already too destitute of timber to be unable to compete with Lowa, Illinois, Ohio and Pennsylvania in the matter of supplying her own people with cheap fuel, she had better go to growing forests at once, stop the sending of money to other States for fuel, and keep it among ourselves. In the timber estimates from the Surveyor General’s office, it is proper to remark that these estimates are not absolutely cor- rect, the timber not being meandered, its inter-section by township and section lines and bearings noted. Although a close approximation, FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 139 my personal observation of the timber in many of those counties causes me to think those estimates were originally high enough, while the con- sumption and destruction since occurring by the settlers, by fire and cat- tle, will far exceed the growth. I might enlarge this paper, perhaps profitably, with a chapter on the untimely effects sure to ensue from the destruction of our forests—the drying up of our creeks and navigable streams, shortening of crops by drought, destruction of property by floods, diminished and uncertain rainfalls, &e. I might also show some of the blessings resulting from extensive forest culture, in the favorable climatic changes sureto follow. better sanitary conditions, and the virtual promotion of all the material interests of the State; but I am admonished to be “short and concise,” and will close by saying there is a rich mine of undeveloped wealth in our treeless regions, which can only be developed by a comprehensive broad gauge system of tree planting. THE TEACHINGS OF MANY YEARS’ EXPERIENCE 1N FOREST CULTURE. Agricultural Editor of the Pioneer-Press : Many years’ experience in timber culture on the farm in central Lowa, has taught me that one hundred cords of wood can be successfully raised on one acre of land, in ten years’ time, by planting in belts on the border of the farm. That the white willow (Salia: alba) is the best border tree for the Northwest. That the yellow cottonwood of the Missouri valley, when planted where it has room to develope itself, has no equal save the yellow poplar, (tulip tree) of the Middle States. That the catalpa is making a good growth as far north as the ' 42d parallel north latitude, is a fine ornamental tree, and is said to be valuable timber for posts and railroad ties. That the seeds of the black walnut should be planted in the fall as soon as gathered, either in the seed-bed or where it should stand in the grove; should be taken from the seed-bed at one year old and trans- planted in the grove of young trees that will not overshadow it while young, and when it is twenty-five or thirty feet high the nurse trees should be taken out, that it may develope into worth. That the white walnut is easily transplanted, and is worthy of the attention of the tree-planting public. That the white or green ash is a tree of great value for farm purposes, easily transplanted, and should be found growing on every farm. That the sugar tree, sometimes called “hard maple,” is one of our finest ornamental trees, stands transplanting well, and is not easily broken by the storm, has few equals on the street or lawn. That the soft maple is a valuable forest tree, and should be set in a thick grove, transplants well at one and two years old,is one of the poorest for the border, as the storms break it worse than almost any other tree. That the box-elder is one of the valuable hardy trees for the border, street or lawn; can be cut in any shape, and will stand more abuse than almost any other tree; makes a valuable shade for the pasture. That the honey locust is a valuable timber tree, of thrifty growth, and transplants well, and were it not for its thorn-producing propensity, would have few equals; the thorny ones, if managed right, make a good hedge for those who like it. That the buckthorn and berberry are hedge plants of value in the Northwest; though slow of growth will make impenetrable barriers with proper care in time. That the osage orange is a failure in 42 north latitude. That tree culture in Linn and Benton counties, Iowa, has proved the best investment made by those who have done the most of it, as acknowledged to me by themselves. W, L. BROCKMAN. CaRROLL Crry, Iowa, January 15th, 1879. 140 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. FOREST CULTURE IN MINNESOTA. A Paper Read before the State Forestry Association, at the Capitol, Saturday Evening, Feb. 12th, 1876, by Leonard B. Hodges. Mr. PRESIDENT: In endeavoring to comply with the invitation of the State Forestry Association to address them this evening on the important subject of forest culture in Minnesota, I am painfully conscious of my inability to do justice to a subject, the proper discussion of which might well occupy the best minds of the State. I crave your indulgence and that of the company present, while endeavoring to lay before you some of the reasons which I trust may be of service in awakening a new interest in a matter of vital importance to Minnesota; and in doing so, may per- haps bring forward. facts and items not wholly new; yet of such practi- cal importance as to bear repeating. With line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little and there a little, all important truths are inculea- ted. ee Until within a few years, the emigrant to Minnesota has been able to obtain good farming land, with plenty of good timber adjoining, or within | convenient distance. Thousands of the earlier settlers were fortunate in obtaining prairie, timber and running water on the same farm. Others coming in later, have obtained choice prairie farms with good timber within three to five miles. And as emigration has gradually over-run the most desirable agricultural portions of the State, the intervening distance between large bodies of choice wheat land and groves of timber, has gradually widened out, until now we find the great body of our most productive agricultural lands so remote from timber as to seriously interfere with their settle- ment. The emigrant who now comes to Minnesota to obtain a farm under the provisions of the Homestead or Pre-emption Law, is compelled to make his choice either in the heavy timber or in the treelessregion. The question for him.to determine at the outset is this: Shail I settle in the heavy timber and spend a life-time in hewing out a farm, or shall I go out into the treeless region and reverse the process—plant, cultivate and prune, instead of cut and slash, burn and grub. Hence the importance and necessity of a correct solution of a question which is of interest not only to the poor emigrant and the well-to-do farmer hunting a new location where he can obtain a thousand or five thousand acres of cheap rich land where he can settle his half dozen sturdy lads ‘around him, but also to the entire State, and more especially to the towns and cities of the State, whose continued growth and prosperity can only be secured and permanently maintained by the gradual and complete agricultural development of what is known as the treeless region of Minnesota. This region stretching away from the “Big Woods” on the east, to Dakota on the west—from Iowa on the sonth, to Manitoba on the north—covering an area of more than twenty thousand square miles—almost an empire in extent—treally the fairest portion of Minnesota—capable, when fully developed, of adding a hundred millions of bushels of wheat to the exports of the State, with a corresponding amount of cattle and dairy products—crossed and re-crossed by seven different lines of land-grant. railroads, rendering it easily accessible from all quarters ; presenting to FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 141 the emigrant the largest, most fertile and most accessible body of govern- ment land now remaining in the United States, needs only the interven- tion of the tree-planter to transform this desertsolitude into what nature intended it for, one of the granaries of the world. On this broad expanse of fertile prairies, with natural meadows, lovely lakes and running streams, forty thousand families can find free homesteads and a healthy climate within hearing of the whistle of the locomotive. The redemption of this treeless solitude; the conversion of its desert wastes into fruitful fields ; is an object of great importance, not alone to this particular region, but also to the entire State. The pioneer work to be done in effecting this change is the patient, persistent, untiring labor of the tree planter. The Treeless Region. To illustrate the necessity and magnitude of the work, let us take a glance of what is known as the “Treeless Region.” Fortunately for Minnesota, she embraces within her borders but a fraction of that great waste which covers the greater portion of the inter- ior section of the North American Continent. The map which I have placed in view, compiled by Prof. Brewer of Yale College, shows at a glance the treeless region. Our own portion is so small compared with the whole, as at first glance to seem too insignifi- cant to make such ado over. Yet we must take into account, small as it appears on the map, itis capable when fully developed of sustaining five times the present population of the State. There is, in addition to the increased productive area to be developed by an extended system of forest culture, the climatic changes and conse- quent benefits resulting therefrom, to be considered. The great objection, and really the only one that is urged against Minnesota by rival interests, is the climate. We point with pride to the progress of our State during the past twenty-five years. Its transforma- tion from a howling wilderness to a sovereign state, with its common schools, its colleges, its churches, its commercial and. manufacturing interests, its 2000 miles of railroad, and its annual crop of 30,000,000 bushels of wheat. We challenge the world to produce a finer brand of flourthan is made every day in Minnesota from Minnesota wheat; we challenge the world to produce an entire community of 600,000 people as well fed, as well clothed, as well educated, as well supplied with the comforts of life, and as well paid for their labor, as are the 600,000 inhabitants of Minnesota. And thos. of us who have been here from the early days, whose labors, privation®s, foresight and energy have contributed so largely to such mag- ‘nificent results—while we may individually regret lost opportunities, each of us, can with more than Roman exultation exclaim, “I am a Minnesotian.” Yet knowing beyond the possibility of any mistake, that we can offer to the; emigant better inducements than any other equal area on God’s footstool; we are failing to get our share. The treeless, arid plains of Kansas, Nebraska and Texas, with their protracted droughts, their grass- hopper experiences and their malarial fevers, aremore than successfully competing with Minnesota for emigration. And why? Simply on account of the grossly exaggerated stories of our winters. That in Minnesota men freeze to death going after a load of wood; farmers freeze to death while hauling their wheat to their near- j42 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. est market; and that there are weeks at a time when it is impossible for aman to go from his house to his barn without oneend ofarope fastened around him and the other end in the house, in his wife’s hands, so she can haul him in, hand over hand, before he perishes; and that even in St. Paul the principal occupation of the street commissioners and their force in winter is in sweeping and shoveling up bushels and wagon loads of fragments of frozen ears and noses which encumber the sidewalks and pavements. The great electrical storm of January 7th, 8th and 9th, 1873, which swept over Manitoba, Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois and other extensive areas, carrying suffering and death into each of those States and Territories, is all located by rival interests in Min- nesota. The story of that storm and its attendant horrors is more firmly estab- lished and more vividly remembered among people seeking new homes in the west, than even the Sioux outbreak in 1862, and is morelasting in its effects. Now, what are we going to do about it? While we laugh at the absur- dity of such stories, we realize their disastrous effects. There is no use in denying them, for the grain of truth we are willing to admit, carries conviction as to the truth of the whole. I see no way but “to take the bull by the horns” and“ face the music.” Save the breath now spent in denying these absurdities for hard work. Instead of a clothes-line running from the house to the barn, surround that house and barn with a live windbreak of willow, cottonwood, larch, pine and spruce; surround your farms with belts of forest timber ; line your public highways with rows of elm, sugar maple, butternut, black walnut, basswood and ash; plant plentifully of acorns in the shaded places of your windbreaks and hedge rows; plant the seed of the ash, elm, box elder, cottonwood, basswood and hackberry on every frontier farm in the State. Take care of them, cultivate them and protect them from fires and from cattle; extend this system over our entire treeless region, and in a very few years our winters will be robbed oftheir terrors, blizzards will be unknown, the grasshoppers will cease to be a burden, the devastating hail storms of midsummer will fail to appear, protracted droughts and devastating foods will be of rare occurrence. Snow block- ades with their attendant embarrassments and loss of time and money will be unknown, the average yield of our cereal crops will be increased, cattle and horses will do better, the difficulties attendant upon fruit growing will vanish, our treeless region will be densely settled, the reven- ues of the State quadrupted, individual taxation lightened, and Minne- sota triuphantly vindicated. Work to be Done. In looking over this last paragraph, I see there is a good deal of work ‘laid out. This work has got to be done. As a State, we are in a similar predicament to the boy after the wood-chuck. We must have the wood- chuck. How to dig him out the quickest and cheapest, is the question always in order. We have all got to dig. This Minnesota State Forestry Association has got to make the dirt fly. We propose to do a heap of digging next Arbor Day, (ist Tuesday of May,) and to plant so many trees in Minnesota on that day, that for the next hundred years people will talk of that day’s work, and point to the results with gratitude and pride. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 148 And right here I come to a tender spot: the members of this associa- tion expect I’ll say something to the legislature in this behalf. Now, I _ have been amember of the legislature myself, and so have most of the members of the State Forestry Association. We know what it is to be buzzed, button-holed, bored, and bamboozled generally. We think we know ourselves better than to fool away our time; besides, we have too much to do. As a society, we are giving the State our experience and our services gratis, we work hard and board ourselves ; we ask no pay for those services, virtue is its own reward. But, we do ask the legislature to appropriate a small sum of money to encourage forest- culture in Minnesota. How do you propose to use it? First, to expend a portion of the appropriation in the publication and distribution of a small pamphlet for gratuitous circulation among the people; this pamphlet to be clearly and tersely written, eminently prac- tical, embodying the experience of practical men, pointing out the proper methods of preparing the ground, how to plant, what to plant, how and when to cultivate, cost of planting, how to propagate success- fully from seeds and cuttings, in short, to give such information on forest-culture, that the work may be done successfully, and that time and money be not wasted; it should also contain the laws of Minnesota relating to forestry, the congressional timber-culture act, the pre-emption act, and the homestead act. It would come so near being an emigration document, that a few chapters on the resources of Minnesota might be profitably appropriately added without much extra cost. Then we pro- pose to devote a large portion of the appropriation in premiums, to be distributed among the people for the general observance of arbor day. The very encouraging results obtained from the very inadequate pre- miums offered by The Pioneer Press Company and the First Division of St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company, to parties planting the most trees or cuttings on arbor day last spring, shows clearly what may be accomplished by a premium list commensurate with the magnitude of the work. A Million of Trees Planted. From the best information I can obtain, I feel safe in saying, that more than a million of forest-trees were planted last arbor day, in Minnesota, under the stimulus of less than $400, and none of that in money. Those premiums were so offered, that but one in each county could, by any possibility win. They were offered so late, that not half of the people heard of the offer until the day was past. This association propose to arrange a premium list so comprehensive and so wide in its range, and to throw it before the public so early, that every man, woman, boy or girl, in Minnesota can have a fair chance of winning a prize. We do not rely solely on the legislature for help to carry on this work: we are trying to help ourselves. A month has not yet passed since the organization of the Minnesota Forestry Association ; from initiation fees, and from donations, we can already offer $700 for premiums next arbor day. We can surely raise this amount to $1000 within a week. The Practicability of the Work. This is a question to be considered in this connection. Practical men who have made forest-culture a study and a business, have no doubts on this subject. 144 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. Impracticable men, educated fools, and those whose skulls are so thick as to require a pile-driver to assist them in getting a new idea, denounce it as impracticable. I apprehend the great diversity of opinion on this subject, is in part, to be accounted for in the wide range of territory the treeless region of the North American Continent covers. I apprehend, and indeed my own experience has suggested and con- firmed the idea, that the difficulty increases in almost exact proportion to the distance from large bodies of timber. wah In my own work for three successive years, I have been obliged to observe that the expense and difficulty of forest-culture increases in very exact proportion to the distance west of the Big Woods. As far west as Willmar, no difficulty has yet been experienced. West of that point, we very soon observe a perceptible decrease of rain fall. We are grad- ually approaching the arid treeless region of Dakota and the plains country. . As we gradually approach this arid region, greater care is found to be necessary in preparing the soil. Greater care is necessary in handling and planting the young trees and cuttings. More cultivation is necesary. Excessive aridity is to be overcome, not by the water-pot, but by the cultivator. Heavy mulching will be found useful. Greater skill, greater care, more and better cultivation, greater expe- rience and more hard, horse sense, will be needed the farther you go west. Our own portion of the treeless region can be redeemed by forest- culture without any great difficulty or expense. Weare, as it were, only on its borders. But when you get out among the sand-hills of the Coteaus, and among the breeding places of the migratory grass-hopper and Colorado beetle, you’ve struck a horse of another color. A big one, and not easily curried. I apprehend that the final redemption of the great treeless region of the continent, will be by the gradual approaches of the tree-planter from Minnesota, and other regions where rain-falls are sufficiently abundant to ensure a reasonable degree of success. My own impression is, that as these artificial plantations are increased and pushed gradually out into the treeless region, that the earth and the air will gradually become somewhat ameliorated ; that the excessive aridity will gradually yield to increasing moisture, and that rainfalls, if not more abundant, will be more durable in affect. Hence, the work we accomplish in redeeming our own portion of the treeless region, sheds its beneficial influences over Dakota, and as we incidentally help Dakota, Dakota will more than repay us in the groves and wind-breaks, she will be enabled to erect between us and Old Boreas. Now, about the cost of this work enough has been said to show that the cost varies with the locality in which the work is to be done. I suppose that portion of the treeless region of Minnesota, which is intersected by the Main Line of the First Division St. Paul and Pacific Railroad, is a fair average of the treeless region of Minnesota—no better and no worse. Now, my experience in this work on that range of country, enables me to say with considerable confidence, that I can figure as closely on the cost of growing 40 acres of forest timber out there, as any farmer can on the cost of growing 40 acrés of wheat, or of com, I might truly say, with more certainty, for there is less risk in raising a crop of forest-trees ; if the corn fails to mature in season, no FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 145 atonement is possible ; not so with the trees, if they get a back-set one year, they can make it all up the next. No crop grown for prafit in Minnesota is more certain to afford satisfactory results. Growing Timber for Profit. In growing forest timber for profit, I should plant much closer than _ 12 feet apart each way. I would advise planting first so as to be sure of complying fully with the requirements of the law ; and then, instead of planting corn or some other hoed crop, I would plant the intervening spaces with forest-tree seeds, so as to have an average stand of four feet apart each way. The onject of thick planting is to compel the young trees to a correct habit of growth, and to sooner shade the ground, thereby shortening up the time of cultivation, and consequently, diminishing the cost of culti- vation. ~) After two or three years of good cultivation, the annual shedding of the foliage of all the quick-growing varieties would so mulch the ground as to render further cultivation unnecessary. Ground pxoperly broken in June, re-plowed in October following, can be planted at once. If you break too early or too late, I would not undertake to say when you could plant it. I can, however, say, without any mental reservation, that the men who commence breaking before the grass is good enough for their oxen to work on, or who continue to run their breaking plows after the prairie grass stops growing, are not only fooling away their time and labor, but laying the foundation for disappointment and failure. Every new comer is pretty sure to fall into this error unless warned, and even then, bitter experience is too often the result of knowing too much. Protection and Preservation of owr Forests. Closely alied to forest culture is the preservation of our native forests. The rapidity of their destruction and the inevitable calamities resulting therefrom ought to awaken us to a lively sense of our duty in this regard. This rapid destruction of our native forests is increasing in exact ratio to the developement of the country. Drafts upon them which would have seemed incredible twenty-five years ago, are now made and honored with scarcely a thought of the future. Demands of Civilization on our Native Forests. In my address before the State Agricultural Society, one year ago, I estimated the annual consumption of wood in Minnesota, to call for an amount equivalent to the annual destruction of 150,000 acres of the native forests of Minnesota. Subsequent investigations confirm the truth of that estimate. We have probably 9,000,000 acres of fair average for- est in Minnesota. If our pesent condition remains unchanged, our sup- ply is good for about 60 years, but if we as a State keep step with the advance of civilization, there are persons now in this room who will . live to see our present supply completely exhausted, unless the supply is renewed by artificial planting. If 600,000 people require 150,000 acres annually, 1,200,000 will require 300,000 acres annually, which would exhaust the present supply within the probable lifetime of the young man just striking out for himself. Wisconsin is destroying her forests at an equally rapid me 146 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 50,000 acres of Wisconsin forests are cut annually to supply the Kan- | sas and Nebraska trade alone. 10,000 acres of forests goes into the stoves and furnaces of Chicago every year. Many additional thousands of acres are annually required to supply that city with the enormous conflagrations she has a habit of indulging in. The Lumberman’s Directory for 1874-5 says, the Chicago lumber trade handles annually 1,350,000,000 feet of lumber, shingles and lath. This aggregate, enormous as it seems, is but one-tenth of the annual consumption of the country. . The Chicago capital used in the lumber trade is $33,000,000. Within the last ten years 12,000,000 acres have been burned over, sim- ply to clear the land. | It is calculated that 8,000,000 acres are cleared every year, and only 10,000 acres planted. The Tariff and Transportation. | Two causes peculiar to this country increase the consumption of our own wood beyond its natural limits: adel The first. is the tariff, which, by taxing foreign competition almost out of the market, concentrates our demand upon our vanishing forests. The second is, that prices do not advance, and so check demand. The reason for this is, that transportation is the chief element of cost in the wood delivered at our doors, and this increases so rapiply as to counteract the otherwise inevitable increase in price. I can buy cord wood for one dollar per cord on line of railroad within 110 miles of St. Paul, but transportation will make it cost me $3 per cord by the time it reaches this city. Gen. Brisbine, of the U.S. army, produces figures in support of the assertion that “at the present rate of consumption, in ten, or at most in twenty years, the forests of Michigan, Wisconsin and Min- nesota will be swept away.” There is now left untouched, he says, in the whole territory of the United States, but one really fine belt of tim- ber—that growing on about one-half of Washington Territory and one- third of Oregon; and this, when the Northern Pacific railroad is built, will soon be destroyed. Then the last great American Forest will have disappeared; and by the way, I am credibly informed that the material for the construction of a common lumber wagon does not exist in that great forest, or indeed, west of the great plains. It should be borne in mind that to this time our great forests have met the demands and destruction of a gradually increasing population, from 3 to 40,000,000 people. We have now gone through and surrounded our great timber reserves, and we enter on the margin of the great tree- less waste, with our original store three-quarters consumed, the demand accelerated and the consumers to rise rapidly from 40,000,000 to 50,000,- 000 within the last quarter of the present century. A little common arithmetic will satisfy any thinking man of the consequences, and of the proportion which the demand and supply will bear to each other at the close, as compared with the commencement, of this century. Extend the time another decade, with the added population, and it will be fortunate if our people get boards three inches wide, as in China at the present time. The Demands of Civilization. The increasing wants of civilization are running way ahead of the FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 147 supply accumulated by the growth of past centuries. Forests, those vast aggregations of nature’s forces, accumulated by an allwise power for the good of mankind, are melting away before the demands of the present, like frost before the morning sun. Civilization is dependent on the forests, and when they fail, civilization goes up the spout. ; In addition to the ever increasing demands of civilization, another element, fire, is annually making such ravages in our forests, that the ravages of the grasshopper and potato bug dwindle into insignificance in comparison. Between the demands of civilization and ravages from fire, our native forests are getting badly squeezed. Cvilization and fire will in time rob us of the Mississippi river, unless this thing is checked and regulated pretty soon. When our northern forests and the big woods west of us have disap- peared, as they assuredly will, unless the State takes more interest in this question than it has hitherto been inclined to, who will care to live in Minnesota? Gentlemen of the legislature, if you have any regard for the best inter- ests of Minnesota, make it manifest by a liberal appropriation for the immediate encouragement of forest culture. Guard it as carefully as you please, but make it at once available. Don’t stop there; make arbor day a legal holiday. Organize a State Land Department ; and appoint a com- mission of the best men in the State to look into the condition of our northern forests. Encourage the people in every practical way to plant trees by the wholesale. Do this now, and the blessings of posterity will follow you. Government on Forestrg. i am not of those who are continually holding up the example of for- eign countries and governments as models for our own affairs. I do not believe in purchasing new red flannel shirts for the amelioration of the unfortunate infants of “ Barrioboola Gha,” while our own urchins are in want of shirts. I cannot say that I can fully appreciate that high toned, fashionable civilization which crowds the opera house of this city, to listen to the dulcet strains of the Hutchinsons, or the ponderous elo- quence of the companion of John Stuart Mill, Bradlaugh, or Queen Victoria, in picturing the beauties of country life in England ; while such men as Delano, Donnelly, Bishop, Marshall, Dunbar, Becker, Webb, Drake, McClung and others have great difficulty in calling together a corporal’s guard to take part in the discussion of home questions, upon the proper discussion of which the existence of civilization depends. But I do believe in applying the beneficial results of the experience of foreign nations in the correct solution of great national problems like the one now under discussion. When the Khedive of Egypt by a sensible expenditure of government funds in tree planting, demonstrates to the world the possibility of redeeming even the deserts of Africa, and rendering them subservient to the wants of civilization ; when the Government of France redeems entire provinces from ruin from drifting sands, which gradually rises upon crops as if they were inundated with water, and the herbage and even the tops of trees which appear quite green and healthy, even to the moment of their being overwhelmed with sand—arresting and effectu- ally staying the progress of this desolation, by planting over 100,000 148 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. acres with the maritime pine, (pinus pilaster) which now produces im- mense amounts of tar, resin, lampblack and timber; when in the north © of Germany immense tracts of loose, drifting sands have in like manner been covered with pine forests; when even Russia has successfully employed the tree planter in fixing the surface of the sandy wastes in her southern provinces ; when the bared mountain tops of Germany and Austria, of Sweden and Norway, are by government authority being reclothed by the planting of new forests; when at this time most of the goverments of Europe have, through the lessons of dear bought exper- ience, been compelled to recognize the importance of forestry, and en- courage it by all the fostering influences at their command ;—may not we, profiting by their experience, take timely warning, and by timely economy provide against approaching desolation ? « Civilization Dependent on Forests. The eminent scholar, G. P. Marsh, in his great work, entitled “ Man and Nature,” says: “If we compare the present physisal condition of the countries of which I am speaking (the Roman Empire) with the descriptions that ancient historians and geographers have given of their fertility and general capability of administering to human uses, we shall find that more than one-half of their whole extent, including the provinces the most celebrated for their profusion and variety of their spontaneous, and their cuitivated products, and for the wealth and social advancement of their inhabitants, is either deserted by civilized man, and surrendered to hopeless desolation, or, at least, greatly reduced, both in productiveness and population. Vast forests have disappeared from mountain spurs and ridges; the vegetable earth accumulated beneath the trees by the decay of leaves and fallen trunks; the soil of the alpine pastures, which skirted and indented the woods, and the mould of the upland fields are washed away ; meadows once productive, fertilized by irrigation, are waste and unproductive, because the springs that fed them are dried up; rivers, famous in history and song, have shrunk to humble brooklets; the willows thet ornamented and protected their banks are gone, and the rivulets have ceased to exist as perennial currents, because the little water that finds its way into their old channels is evaporated by the droughts of summer, or absorbed by the parched earth before it reaches the low-lands ; the beds of the brooks have widened into broad expanses of sand and gravel, over which, though in the hot season, passed dry-shod, in winter sea-like torrents thunder; the entrances of navigable streams are obstructed by sand-bars; and harbors, once marts of an extensive commerce, are shoaled by the deposits of the rivers, at whose mouths they lie.” All this might have been prevented if the Roman grangers had passed a few bills for the encouragement of tree-planting. But they did’nt do it, and you now see what a fix they have got into, by not attending to tree-planting in season. The forests of Lebanon, once the supply of neighboring countries, have long since disappeared; the mountain ranges of Syria, and the once powerful kingdom of Persia, are now dry, barren ridges of naked rock, absolutely incapable of re-producing the woods which once covered them. ‘ Large tracts in the interior of Asia Minor, and even portions of Italy, are now a horrible desert, seamed with ravines and gullies, or piled with ridges of sand and gravel, and utterly irreclaimable to the use of man. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 149 Blanque, a French writer, quoted by Marsh, speaking of the destruc- tion of the forest in certain mountainous parts of France, says, that he found not a living soul in districts where he had enjoyed hospitality thirty years before; the last inhabitant having been compelled to “ get out of that” when the last tree fell. Gentlemen, your duty is plain. Ignore this plain duty, and the his- torian of the future will write of Minnesota, as an eminent writer, now writes of another region, using these words: “ Many countries have, by the destruction of the forests, been deprived of rain, moisture, springs, and water courses, which are necessary to vegetable growth. “Tn Palestine, and many other parts of Asia, and northern Africa, which, in ancient times, were the granaries of Europe, fertile and popu- lous, similar consequences have been experienced. These lands are now deserts, and it is the destruction of the forests alone which has produced thas desolation.” On this point I could enlarge indefinitely. Evidenceof this character, from the most eminent scientists of both hemispheres, can be piled up mountain high, illustrating the absolute dependence of civilization upon forests. It is a question of not merely local, but of national importance. You are too well informed to need further argument. I trust I have not exceeded the bounds of propriety in merely calling your attention in plain and unmistakable language to the prompt performance of an urgent duty. I could not do my duty by doing less. Fencing. I had fortified myself with a large amount of statistics on the destruc- tion of forests, and the inevitable results. But time is passing, and it takes a better man than I am to entertain an intelligent audience over thirty minutes. I had also, gathered some considerable information on the subject of fencing, although somewhat foreign, it is so intimately connected with forest-culture, as to really and fairly come within the scope of this discussion. I merely say, that restraining cattle and horses from running at large, would be a great encouragement to forest- culture in Minnesota, and an immense relief to the agriculturist. The cost of fencing against cattle and horses is the heaviest burden the Minnesota farmer carries. It costs the farmers of Minnesota more than two millions of dollars per annum to fence against horses and cattle; enough to wipe out the old State railroad bonded indebtedness in short order, and leave some- thing for tree-planting. It occurs to me that the legislature should take such action as to relieve the farming community of this Herculean burden. The common law is clear on this point; that owners of live stock must take care of them, or be held responsible for the damage they commit. An act of the legislature plainly interpreting the common law, and so spreading it on our statute books as to clearly define the rights, duties, and responsibilities of all parties concerned, is loudly called for. It is also a well established principle of common law, that private interests must give way to public intersts. On this principle, are based _ the laws of eminent domain. Under those laws, the public can run a highway through the middle of your farm, and you can’t help yourself. A railroad corporation can run its lines through your private estate, condemn and appropriate to their own use such portions as their wants 150 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. demand. They can even, and sometimes do, tear down your houses and barns, and you are powerless to prevent it. You are in the way of the public, you must get out of the way, for the public have the right of way over all intervening obstacles. I am no lawyer, but have not lived over fifty years without finding out that “common law” is simply com- mon sense boiled down. Let us apply this principle of common law, or common sense, to the question involved. Common sense revolts at the idea of the “tail wag- ging the dog.” Yet, under the absurd statute laws of Minnesota, the tail of the dog swings the entire animal. Let us examine into facts bearmg upon this question. Referring to the report of the Auditor of State for the fiscal year ending November 30th, 1875, we find the total value of all the cattle, horses, mules and asses in Minnesota, to be $17,492,980. Referring to the latest statistics on crops, we find that they represent of crops that have to be fenced in from cattle and horses, not less than $40,000,000 annually in Minnesota, besides 20,000,000 young forest trees. Here we may place the fences necessary to protect the growing crop of $40,000,000, at a valuation of $20,000,000. We thus observe that we invest $20,000,000 in fence, to protect $40,- 000,000 worth of crops from $17,492,980 worth of cattle and horses, or, in other words, we exhibit the ludicrous spectacle of a $17,000,000 tail wagging a $60,000,000 dog. But there is a moral principle involved in this question which enters too largely into all its phases to be ignored. Under the laws of eminent domain, you split my well-fenced cultivated farm into two unequal sized, irregular shaped pieces. The arbitrary award of damages rarely, if ever makes me whole, but I am further outraged by being compelled to erect a lawful fence each side of this public highway to protect my erowing crops, my young orchard and my grove of young forest and ornamental trees from destruction from cattle and horses permitted by the statutes of Minnesota to run at large in this christian country, in this enlightened century, up to this centennial year. Those cattle and horses are simply trespassers. JI am their victim. Their owners have neither the right to allow them to run at large, or to compel me to build that legal fiction, known as a lawful fence. When I was a youngster, I followed surveying for a livelihood, and I well remember the remark of an old Quaker, who gave me one of my first jobs, in running and establishing his boundary lines; it was this: ““Good line fences are the foundation of true religion.” There is much truth in that remark, but a long experience compels me to believe that a general, sweeping herd law would promote true religion more effectually than the labors of half the men who make the promotion of that caus a specialty. I feel safe in saying, that by far the greatest amount of difficulty and bad feeling in every agricultural community is caused and kept in full force, by keeping in force that relic of barbarism compelling the fencing in of crops. Any man who wants a new home, will give those counties the prefer- ence who have had the good sense to adopt the herd law. Pass a general herd law, applicable to every section of the State, and you wipe out a, relic of barbarism, promote Christianity, encourage tree-planting, encour- age emigration, and increase and promote the general welfare. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. ial Number of plants or trees on an acre, at various distances apart: Opeinehes a pakivedeh: Waviedtes - utteeyesy ite eae ois te sis sea hel slows 154,240 Baath Acie. TE REMOnSS Spire WEEE! n-ne ape ie eee ee 43,560 13 feet < is FE Oe NS SOULS Cae ete WE fe a a 19,360 Peeetn Oy fO0b 6s 2-6 2) Faem ae SP Mt eee cvs al De ue? vs “e - s'egat as! 21,780 PRC Cie PAnmeaC MW vcs oleic ce ya Mtaeneiles 0s). sis, leycer Ge) sya eso! ye ee) one 10,890 CID Nope Cima era memes Ma fe Me erate, ra) aM wal agedren en a. 7b) sete ee cs 7,260 MCE M PUR ECACIIU WANE sisi. Reis ies Pama co) SP. Se ahha Nolte era hoof atoms 4,840 4 feet “ iz A RS BERD Poe ee ee eee nen a me Pema 2,730 5 : ; 3 . se ea CORED RE RIC SEC ER en ce cate SECM 1,750 4 a rf i TS a, DO IES Co SERENE NEC aceon te eC tic enter rales eaey RO ae emtcraren smi 78s etree 2b RPM RE gh ago Ie “ce “ee “ce “ ah rug 300 nee i - eke ee ea oe SME MMM MMM era fe et 1s oes) auch ly Phe career ie) as dwar LED 74 ea x s MNS ai fe terete TA DS Wes isis bor te St te er euteee | ciasi 110 a ; is ea Wane ey Ee Sei cine, SRL OLTeR ERC. cee wret seta be fac a eae 90 rl i i Ree ne Cathie. ae own cote i ates ca ea el Paetia eeeeee Bae Deeg Se d0 Rows six feet apart, and trees one foot apart in the row, 7,315 trees per acre. Rows 8 feet apart, and one foot apart in the row, 5,404 trees per acre. Rows 10 feet apart, and one foot apart in the row, 4,389 per acre. One mile of wind-breaks or shelter-belt, riquires 5,280 trees or cuttings for a single row, one foot apart in the row. The white willow cuttings can be bought for $1.50 per 1000. Cottonwood cuttings, for $2.50 per 1000. Well-rooted yearling or seedling cottonwood trees, ash, box-elder and soft maple, for $3.00 to $5.00 per 1000. Scotch Pine, 6 to 9 inches, $15.00 to $18.00 per 1000. European Larch, 8 to 10 inches, $10.00 per 1000. Robert Douglass & Son., Waukegan, Ilinois, grow larch and evergreens more extensively, perhaps, than any other party in America. Send for their catalogue. : REPORT. To His Excellency, Hon. John S. Pillsbury, Governor of Minnesota : Sir :—The act of March 2nd, 1876, making an appropriation of $2,500 to the Minnesota State Forestry Association, requires that a report shall be made to the Governor, to be transmitted to the next Legislature, showing the disbursements of the same. In accordance herewith, I respectfully submit the following : On a call for a public meeting to be held at the capitol on Tuesday, the 11th day of January, 1876, for the purpose of organizing a State Forestry Association, signed by E. F. Drake, Wm. R. Marshall, Wm. Lee, Horace Thompson, H. M. Rice, Wm. Crooks, Herman Trott, M. 8. Wilkinson, O. P. Whitcomb, Ignatius Donnelly, Geo. L. Becker, H. H. Sibley, J. W. Bishop, and many others, said meeting was held in the hall of the House of Representatives, and a committee was appointed to report a constitution for such association, and on the 12th of January, at an adjourned meeting of the persons who had previously signified their desire to become members of such association, the said committee reported a constitution for said association, which was adopted, and the following named persons were elected officers of such association under said constitution, to-wit: 152 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. President—KE. F. Drake, of Ramsey county. Vice-President—First Congressional District, A. A. Soule. Vice President—Second Congressional District, Ignatius Donnelly. Vice President—Third Congressional District, J. H. Stevens. Secretary—L. B. Hodges, of Ramsey county. Treasurer—Pennock Pusey, of Ramsey county. Elective officers of Executive Committee—Charles Y. Lacy, of State University, G. W. Fuller, of Meeker county; John P. Shoenbeck, of Nicollet county, and J..W. Blake, of Lyon county. On or about the first of November last, I was informed by State Auditor Whitcomb, that he deemed it necessary for the State Forestry Association to reorganize under the general laws of Minnesota, before he felt justified in paying over to said association any money appropriated by act of March 2nd, 1876. I at once notified the officers and members of said association, that a meeting for such purpose would be held at the Railroad Commissioner’s office, at the capitol, on the 23d day of No-- vember, 1876. Said meeting was duly held, and articles of incorporation were execu- ted, published and filed in the office of Secretary of State. Having thus acquired a perfect legal organization, the association at once commenced making arrangements for the payment of premiums offered for tree-planting last spring, and which were to be awarded to the successful contestants at the annual meeting of the association, com- mencing on the second Tuesday in January, 1876. The association, recognizing the importance of enlisting the vast army of children in the great work before them, made special provision for them in the list of premiums to be offered. To the boy or girl under ten years of age, in each county in the State, who planted not less than ten trees or twenty cuttings, was offered a Centennial Medal or Badge. To the hoy or girl in each county in the State, under 14 years old,who planted the greatest number on Arbor day, not less than two thousand cuttings, or one thousand trees, $5.00. For the second greatest number as above, not less than five hundred trees, or one thousand cuttings, $2.00. ; To stimulate the good work among “ children of larger growth,” the association offered for the greatest number, not less than seven thousand cuttings, or twenty-five hundred trees, planted by any one person on Arbor day, $10.00. . For second greatest number as above, not less than four thousand cuttings, or fifteen hundred trees, $5.00. For third greatest number as above, not less than two thousand cut- tings, or one thousand trees, $3.00. For fourth greatest number as above, not less than one thousand cut- tings, or five hundred trees, $2.00. In addition to the above, Hon. F. R. Delano, of St. Paul, offered to _ the association fifty dollars each year for five years, to the man, his wife and children, who, in any one of the strictly prairie counties of Min- nesota, plants during the planting season of each year the most trees and cuttings, all kinds. The Pioneer Press Company, also, offers a copy of the Daily Pioneer Press to the party winning the ‘“ Delano Premium.” The Pioneer Press Company, also, offered a copy of its Weekly to the party in each county in the State, who won the $10.00 premium. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 153 ‘Fhe Saint Paul Dispatch, also, offered a copy of its daily, to the per- sons in each of ten of the prairie counties of the State, who should, during the entire planting season, plant the most trees and cuttings, not less than fifteen thousand cuttings, or five thousand trees. Results. In response to the foregoing offers of premiums for tree-planting, we have returns from fifty counties in Minnesota, showing that not less _ than fifteen hundred thousand forest trees and cuttings were planted on Arbor day, (the first Tuesday in May, 1876,) and that from 8,000,000 to 10,000,000 were planted during the season of 1876. Arbor Day. I am often asked the meaning of Arbor Day, and why the greater portion of the premiums were offered for work done on that day. In answer, would say, that in this we copy from our neighboring States of Towa and Nebraska, in dedicating one day during the planting season to -tree-planting. This act of itself brings the matter of tree-planting before the minds of the people, and keeps it there to some purpose. The association, after a full and free interchange of experience and opinion, decided on the first Tuesday of May, as probably the best day that could be fixed on for Minnesota—neither too early nor too late. The experience of its members was very uniform in the necessity of planting as early as the condition of the ground would permit, ‘in order to enable the young tree to get fairly to growing before the dry weather comes on in the spring. Another reason, was to correct the widespread prevailing opinion as to the amount of this kind of work an ordinary able-bodied man could do in one day. It was absolutely held by many that a thousand cuttings, or five hundred yearling, or two-year-old trees was a good, average day’s work. My own experience in superintending the work of tree-planting on the Main Line of the St. Paul & Pacific railroad for several years, and on amore extensive scale than had hith- erto been executed in Minnesota, had fully convinced me of the necessity _ of disabusing the public in this regard. The tree-planting crew of the St. Paul and Pacific road, had for years averaged two thousand cuttings, or one thousand trees per man per day, -and on extra occasions when it became necessary to save stock, which was in a perishing condition, they had doubled that, and on Arbor day of 1875, some of those boys planted between nine thousand and ten thousand cuttings each, a feat never before to my knowledge surpassed, yet the action of the association in offering so many premiums for this sort of work on Arbor day, has fairly eclipsed the performances of my old crew, in whom I took so much pride, and raised the standard to about where it should be. The men who can plant ten thousand cuttings each in a day, are by no means, scarce in Minnesota. The action of this association has also developed the fact, that there are plenty of boys from ten to fifteen years old, who, on Arbor day, planted from one thousand to seven thousand five hundred cuttings each, and that several children less than ten years old, planted from five hundred to one thousand each. Having thus in one year educated the people to about what they can do in this direction, the necessity of placing so many premiums for Arbor day performances, is not so press- ing, and the great bulk of the premiums hereafter to be offered should 154 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. be to parties doing the greatest amount of work during the entire plant- ing season. When we take into consideration that many hundred thousand trees are now standing in Minnesota, which will yield from half a cord to one and a half cords each, have been grown from cuttings and from seedlings, within from ten to twenty years, we see the great propriety of encouraging the children by the award of such premiums as will add new interest to the work; and when we take into further consideration the unwelcome truth that nearly or quite one-third of the finest agricul- tural lands in Minnesota, amounting to not much less than twelve mil- lions of acres, are so destitute of timber, as not at the present time to afford much over an acre of timber to a quarter section of prairie, we begin to realize the fact that tree-planting to that portion of the State,is like the religion of Christ to the impenitent sinner, “the one thing needful.” That vast region of prairie, with a soil “as black as ink,” interspersed with running streams, lovely lakes and natural meadows of the finest native grasses, evidently designed by the Creator, as one of the great granaries of the world, can only be made habitable for dense communi- ties except through the intervention of the tree-planter. A few nomadic settlemente can now prosper by stock-growing in spite of the grasshop- per, but its present lack of timber forbids general settlement and cultiva- tion, and I fully endorse the sentiment of Prof. Lacy, that it is “cruel inhumanity” for the State to allure the immigrant into this region, without, at the same time doing its full part in the great work of render- ing this undeveloped region habitable for human beings. I think I am not putting it too strong in saying, that a very large pro- portion of the settlers now trying to develope that region will be com- pelled to abandon it within another decade, unless they soon commence a general, comprehensive and intelligent system of forest culture. The chief aim of the State Forestry Association is the ultimate redemp- tion of this region. In the terse language of the president of our asso- ciation, “ the prairie must be conquered.” I have deferred making this report tol now on account of many claims for premiums by contestants who have not in their returns com- plied with the rules and regulations of this association. Section 1 of the act of March 2d, 1876, clearly indicates that all moneys ~ pele on premiums are to be awarded in accordance with rules and regu- ations to be adopted by this association. In conformity with this requirement, the State Forestry Association, at its meeting in March last, in making out a premium list, also made and adopted the following Rules and Regulations. 1st.—No trees or cuttings planted as above to be allowed to contest for any of above premiums, except such as are alive and in a healthy growing condition, and showing evidence of care and cultivation in the month of October next after Arbor Day. 2d.—Each competitor to plant his own trees, but in case of sickness or unavoidable absence on Arbor Day, he can employ a substitute. 3d.—All trees, cuttings or seeds to. produce the trees to compete for above prizes must be planted on Arbor Day, (except otherwise men- tioned), by the competitor or such substitnte as he may employ, and the plantation for competition must not average less than 2,500 nor more than 4,356 trees to an acre. 4th.—The competitor must count his trees and cuttings and send FoRHST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 155 / report of number planted to the secretary of this association on or before the first day of June next. 5th.—The competitor must, in the month of October next succeeding Arbor Day, in the presence of two witnesses, count his trees, (counting only such as are alive,) and make affidavit before a justice of the peace, or any officer authorized to administer oaths, as to the following matters: A.—Whole number of trees planted last Arbor Day and now alive. B.—Name and number of each kind. ~ -C.—How planted. D.—How cultivated. E.—Cost of plantation. F.—Average size of each species. And such affidavit shall be certified to by both witnesses of the count; and the officer administering the oath shall certify to the identity and credibility of the competitor and his witnesses. 6th.—All trees planted to compete for these premiums are to be for permanent belts or groves and not to sell, except as they may be neces- sarily thinned out. when they may have become crowded. _7th.—The affidavits prescribed above to be forwarded to the secretary at St. Paul, by the first day of December next after the count of the trees. 8th.—No clubbing or joining of timber plantations upon lands owned by different parties, for the purpose of securing the premiums, will be allowed; every tub must stand on its own bottom. 9th.—Premiums will be awarded at the annual session of the associa- tion, commencing on the second Tuesday of January next after receipt of affidavits, and paid to order of party to whom awarded. For the purpose of obtaining statistics of timber planting, for public information, all persons not competing for the above premiums, who may make tree plantations, are requested to furnish the following points of information to the secretary, in return for which bhey, will be given a copy of the transactions of this association: 1st.—Acres planted, or rods of trees in line planted. 2d.—Kinds, and number of each kind. 3d.—How many lived and grew well. 4th.—Cost of plantation. To which append name and address. Three thousand copies of the premium list, with the rules and regula- tions as above, were printed and distributed to every portion of the State during the month of March last. At the annual session of the association, held at the capitol, com- mencing on the second Tuesday of January last, for the purpose of awarding premiums, it was found that a considerable number of con- testants for premiuns, had, in making their returns, wholly ignored the established rules and regulations of the association. As there was nothing on the face of such returns indicating fraud, but rather evidence that the statements and returns had been made by parties to whom such -work was new and unaccustomed, the committee on awards decided to extend the time for revising and correcting such imperfect returns, to the first of March next, and that the claims of all contestants failing to correct and perfect their statements in conformity with the rules and regulations of the association, by the time aforesaid, should then cease and be considered void and worthy of no further consideration. The amount of money actually awarded and paid over as county 156 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. premiums, on claims made in accordance with the rules and regulations, is two hundred and fifty-eight dollars. The amount which is liable to be paid out on account of the suspended claims heretofore referred to, cannot be definitely stated at the present time, but will probably not exceed five hundred dollars. In the matter of obtaining the centennial medals and badges as pre- miums for the young tree planters, I found, on diligent application to the subject in hand, that such medals as would be at all appropriate or characteristic would have to be manufactured for the association. The next question to decide was, whether to have this work done by one of our own citizens and within our borders or in Chicago. I ascertained that the work could be done as well in St. Paul as in Chicago, and at no greater cost. I accordingly contracted with Mr. A. EK. Melgren, of St. Paul, for the manufacture of not less than three hundred dollars’ worth of medals and badges for premiums for tree planting. By the terms of the contract, the medals and badges were to be delivered to the association ready for distribution prior to the annual meeting of the association in January. A silver medal of coin standard, of the size of an American dollar, of appropriate and characteristic design, each medal to have a hole drilled through it, with ribbon and case, and to have the name of the person to whom awarded engraved on one side of said medal, and a wreath of forest leaves to encircle the name to be stamped in circle and at the outer edge. On the reverse side the words: “Minnesota State Forestry Association, 1876,” stamped in circle near the outer edge of the medal, and within this the figure of an oak tree. Such medal to be furnished as above for two dollars each. A copper medal exactly like the silver medal, and struck from the same die, to be furnished for seventy-five cents each. Acorn badges, of coin silver, to be mounted with pins so as to be worn as convenience might dictate, to be furnished for one dollar each. Acorn badges, the acorn of gold, mounted as above, for one dol- lar and twenty-five cents each. It is to be borne in mind that the award of this work to Mr. Melgren was virtually the inauguration of a new manufacturing interest in Min- nesota. Dies had to be made, a new and powerful press had to be man- ufactured. Early in January the stamping of the medals had com- menced, but the accidental breakage of the press has delayed the completion of the job. As the outlay of Mr. Melgren in obtaining the proper machinery for the manufacture of the aforesaid medals and badges was largely in excess of the entire amount of his contract, the association advanced him two hundred dollars to commence with, and are to pay him the remaining one hundred dollars on completion of the job. An estimate of the money disbursed, or liable soon to be disbursed, by the Minnesota State Forestry Association, would read about as follows: Amount awarded and paid for premiums at the annual meeting, . . . . $258 00 Amount to be paid in premiums on suspended claims, say ...... - 500 00 Amount paid A. EK. Melgren for medals and badges, - ......... 300 00 $1,058 00 Leaving an unexpended balance of the appropriation of March 2nd, 1876, of probably about $1,442. In this connection, and just at this point, it is proper to say that the appropriation of March 2d, 1876, was, by the terms of the act, so tied up as to prevent the association from FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 157 using any portion of said appropriation for any other purpose than that of paying premiums. Nota dollar could be used for the publication of pamphlets on forest culture for gratuitous distribution among the peo- ple, not a dollar for the purchase of young trees and cuttings for gratu- itous distribution among people of the treeless region, who are anxious and willing to plant, but who, owing to the successive grasshopper raids, are unable to expend money for such purpose, in short, not even a dol- lar for postage stamps and stationery or any other necessary expense of the association All such expenses had to be incurred and paid, and the association has so far, by the voluntary contributions of its members, furnished the money for all its operating expenses, except for premiums. This voluntary cash outlay for incidental and unavoidable running expenses, which the association was compelled to make, in order to accomplish any of its purposes, (without which it might as well have - disbanded at the outset,) includes the payment for printing and circu- lating one hundred and twenty thousand pages of printed matter on the subject of forestry; for printing and distributing three thousand large hand bills, containing premium list and rules and regulations of the association ; for publishing articles of incorporation, and for the station- ery and postage to enable the secretary of the association to keep up its correspondence, which has involved the writing and answering of over four hundred letters, on the subject of forestry in Minnesota. Among the reports and letters received by the association from parties engaged in forest culture in various portions of the State, are many that of too much practical and permanent value to remain in obscurity. They should be published for the instruction and encouragement of others who are now making their first attempts in forest culture in Min- nesota. The various essays, addresses and other papers of great practiacl value, which have been prepared and written at a large outlay of valu- able time by gentlemen who have the welfare of the State at heart, are voluntary contributions to the science of forestry. For all this outlay of time and of money in preparing and publishing this kind of infor- mation for gratuitous distribution among the people of Minnesota, the State has so far never contributed a dollar. It cannot reasonably be expected that this great work can much longer be upheld and success- fully carried on by the voluntary contributions of a handful of public spirited citizens. They have exemplified their faith by their works, and have demonstrated, beyond cavil or doubt, the practicability and impor- tance of the work. . The Minnesota State Forestry Association is the pioneer institution for reclaiming and rendering habitable and productive the last great tract of fertile agricultural lands to which we can point the tide of emigra- tion. It is comparatively an easy task to turn an immense tide of immigration to that fertile region; but without fuel, or timber, or shade, or shelter, can we keep them there? That’s the question. This association, if liberally aided by the State, cannot only draw the emigrant to this fertile but treeless region, but can keep him there by aiding and teaching him to render his new home pleasant, attractive and in every way desirable. No small outlay of time, labor or money is so sure to be attended with satisfactory results as in tree planting. The man who, by his intel- ligent foresight, has raised a beautiful grove of forest trees around his house and stock yard, has not only doubled the value of his farm, but 158 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. has become so attached to that homestead as not to abandon it for trivial. or imaginary causes. He is going to stay there. Of the hundred boys and girls of the treeless region, who have earned their centennial: medal or badge this past season, at least nine-tenths of them will do better from year to year, if only encouraged. Every medal or badge so distributed becomes at once a preacher, a missionary of tree planting. The one solitary boy out in Cottonwood, or Brown, or Stevens or any other treeless county, who has earned his silver medal or badge, shows it to all his playmates and acquaintances, and next season, instead of one boy hesitating, doubtfully taking hold of the good work, a dozen or may be a hundred resolute little fellows are eager and ready to “pitch in.” Is there any better way to utilize and turn to good account this immense and irrepressible force of Min- nesota’s share of Young America? We do not ask, or even expect aid enough from the State this year to utilize and put into operation this immense power, but we do expect some little aid in this direction. There is probably no branch of industry where the intelligent and correct application of common sense is more necessary to produce profit- able results than in agriculture, horticulture and forestry. Nearly all the failures that have occurred in tree planting are primarily the result of either ignorance or heedlessness. There is no more use of losing trees or cuttings from drought, than in losing wheat or corn from the same cause. When such losses do occur the planter is nine times out of ten more to blame than the weather. We need money to publish ten thousand copies of a small pamphlet giving the tree planter such correct and practical information as will enable him to do his work correctly, and consequently, successfully. The St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company having, through its changed management, abandoned tree planting, have donated millions of cut- tings and young trees to this association for distribution among the peo- ple of the treeless region. We need aid in rendering this donation of any value, aid to pay the actual cost of preparing the cuttings, and dig- ging the trees and shipping. A little aid now rendered by the State will enable us to place hundreds of thousands of cuttings and young trees in the hands of worthy men, who would, in transforming them into groves, wind breaks and land marks, render back to the State, in a short time, full value, pressed down and running over. The good results we can accomplish are only limited by the amount we receive from the State. The association has carefully considered the question of how small an amount will enable them to make reasonable progress in the work in hand, and through their executive committee have placed the amount to be asked for of the Legislature at two thousand dollars, in addition to the unexpended balance of the appropriation of 1876. It is to be borne in mind that this is a new organization, and on trial before the State. It has a reputation to make for usefulness ; for ability to meet its promises, and for prudent and economical management. Its premium list, when circulated last spring, called forth in numerous instances, the remark, that like the State Agricultural Society, the asso- ce would prove a failure, and that its premiums would never be paid. | We point to our first year’s record with an honest pride; our pre- miums are being paid off as fast as claims for payment are substantiated ; FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 159 every obligation of the association has been met at maturity, with the same promptness that for many years has characterized its prominent members in their individual capacity. When we can no longer meet our obligations with absolute certainty, we will close up the concern before any one has an opportunity to lose a dollar. We have abundant reason to believe, that the competition for such premiums as this association may offer the coming spring, will be con- tested with an eagerness and energy worthy of the cause, and that every dollar awarded by this association can be likened unto seed sowed on good ground, bringing forth an hundred fold. The direct effects of forest-culture, (I might more properly say, the immediate results,) are well illustrated in the case of the First Division of the St. Paul & Pacifie railroad company, as exemplified on its main line. At the time tree— planting was commenced on said line, in the spring of 1873, by order of Geo. L. Becker, then president of said railroad company, emigration to either railroad or government land on that line, west of Willmar, was small; in fact, for some months after the memorable storm of January 7th, 8th and 9th, 1873, more people abandoned that region than moved into it. I well remember the persevering efforts of the land commis- sioner of said company in endeavoring to get his share of what little emigration the State was getting at that time--how difficult it was to get any one to go westof Kandiyohi county; how he called my attention to his original plan of “ sectional farming,” giving the settler time to break an entire section of six hundred and forty acres, and raise three crops on it without any cash payment—charging no interest, and taking full payment for the land out of the third crop; and how, with all his labor and planning, and advertising, the railroad lands did’nt go off like hot cakes. And then, in March, 1876, when his department was taxed to its utmost capacity, when he was selling more lands than any land grant railroad in the United States, he came into my office one day, and in his quiet, kind way, says to me, “ Mr. Hodges, I wish to do vou the justice, to say that your tree-planting on our main line, is the best advertisement of the company’s lands we have ever had, and is now worth more to us than all the money we have expended for advertising.” From that date up to the grasshopper invasion of July last, no such rushing tide of emigration has been witnessed in Minnesota since 1857, as poured over the main line, from February to July, 1876. The Saint Paul and Pacific Railroad First Division Company, sold more land in 1875, than any other land-grant company in the United States, and when I remark, that tree-planting on that line contributed as much or more, than any other agency in producing such satisfactory result, ] am saying ' no more than the facts warrant. I mention this, that the State may avail itself of any agency in peopling our broad prairies, that the Dutch bond-holding interest fails to comprehend. Congressional Timber-culture Act. Before closing this report, J am compelled by the condition of exist- ing facts, to call your attention to the actual workings of the timber- culture act. Although repeatedly amended to meet the needs of the people and the country it seeks to benefit, candor compels me to say, it is not yet in good working order. As briefly as possible, I will point out some of the defects. First, it is requiring more of the settler than he is able to accomplish. The resultis,in a very large majority of cases the law is not complied with any farther than to file the claim in the 160 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. land office, pay the entry fee and break ten acres. By this time the | settler begins to realize the nature of the contract he has undertaken to execute. He now sees clearly that he is too poor to do the work as it should be done. He begins to evade the plain intent and spirit of the law, in the painful economy of time and labor, he can so poorly afford to expend. Not that he wishes to defraud the government, or shirk his responsibilities, but rather from an inadequate realization of what must be done, and a natural desire to save what he has invested, and can so poorly afford to loose, leads him into such crooked practice as we see on nine-tenths of the quarter-sections held under the provisions of this act. Another defect in the law, is in the extreme facility land can be held by parties who make the claim, with no serious intention of planting any trees, but simply to do a little breaking and take his chances in selling his interest in it, in the course of the two years he can hold it, for a profit. In this way, and aided by extensions of time, granted on account of destruction by grasshoppers and other unavoidable accidents, large quantities of’ very dssirable government land is prevented from being occupied and improved by actual settlers. Thousands of acres of government lands are thus held, free of costs or taxes, and I see no difficulty ina company of ingenious operators, doing an extensive real- estate business under the workings of this act, for quite an extended and indefinite period of time. Another defect in the Congressional Tim- ber-culture Act, is the clause permitting the trees to be planted “ not more than twelve feet apart each way.” This is a very serious defect, and of itself, virtually defeats the objects and purposes of the act. Nature shows as plainly how forests are grown, and it is folly on the part of Congress to evade or repeal natural laws governing the growth of forests. Nature plants thickly, pays no regard to the permission of Congress to plant so wide of the mark as twelve feet apart each way, and succeeds. In her own way she grows more timber and better timber on ten acres, than the settler can in the mode indicated by Congress, on forty acres, and at a tithe of the expense. To illustrate—forty acres planted twelve feet apart each way, must be thoroughly cultivated during the growing season of each year, until the growing trees have attained such proportions as to shade and mulch the ground. It requires the constant daily labor of the settler during the growing season, from May to August. The parties sought to be benefited by the act, are too poor to give so large a portion of their time to the work. The “ human necessity for daily bread” compels their attention to the care of growing crops upon which existence depends. It is a notable fact, that thus far, the only successful and genuine cases of tree- planting under the provisions of this act, that have come under my notice, are those where the planter has been financially able to plant closely. Say, on an average of four feet apart each way. A forest so planted, with prompt and thorough cultivation for three years, is a success—the chief cost is terminated in three years from planting; the young trees make a straight, upright, vigorous growth ;— they soon cover and ‘shade the ground so thoroughly, as to effectually prevent tne growth of weeds or grass among the trees, and the annual mulching from the falling foliage keeps the ground moist and friable, obviating the necessity of cultivation, and promotes the “ healthy, grow- ing condition ” which the act of Congress very properly requires. On the other hand, the evasions of the law are painfully conspicuous. In. many instances, strips of breaking, three or four feet wide, parallel FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 161 with each other, are either planted with tree seeds or cuttings, so as to bring them within distance allowed by law. The planting is usually done in the raw sod—left without care or cultivation, smothered in rank weeds and grass, and swept over by successive prairie fires. It is difficult to employ language sufficiently vigorous In denouncing such childish folly. It is as idle to expect to grow successfully a crop of forty acres of forest-trees without first breaking every foot of the forty acres, then followed after the decomposition of the sod, by thorough ploughing and repeated harrowing, as it would be to expect to grow a paying crop of corn by digging post-holes twelve feet apart each way on the unbroken prairie, and dropping the seed therein. A modification of the timber-culture act, requiring the settler to plant not less than 2,700 trees per acre, instead of 3800 per acre, and ten acres instead of forty acres, would accomplish the objects and purposes contemplated by the framers of the act, and in time, prove an incalculable blessing to the treeless wastes of the western and north-western States and territories. I trust the action of the Lac qui Parle county agricultural society will be followed up by similar societies in the treeless regions of the north- west, that the legislatures of the different States interested therein, will take such action in the premises as will compel the favorable action of Congress in this behalf. The law to be available and productive of the greatest good to the people and to the country, should be so amended as to allow all who have already made claims under its provisions to be allowed to plant ten acres instead of forty; to plant not more than four feet apart each way, to be planted within four years; two and a half acres the second year ; two and a half acres the third year, and five acres the fourth year. To compel the claimant to report the actual condition of his timber plantation annually, to the register of the land office of the district in which the land is located. He should be, by the terms of the act, com- pelled to do his work in a thorough and workmanlike manner, to keep the ground well and thoroughly cultivated, until such time as the growth and development of trees shall have rendered such further cultivation impracticable and unnecessary. And he should be required to fill all vacancies occurring from any cause within one year; such report to be _ verified by the affidavit of the claimant, and also, by the afhdavits of two competent and disinterested witnesses, failing in which, the land should be open to settlement by other parties. It is urged, in objection to such modifications of the timber-culture act, that Congress never would consent to give away sixteen acres of land for the planting of one acre of timber. Now, this objection brings up one more modification, and that is, to make the provisions of the act cover every quarter-section of govern- ment prairie land within the limits of what is universally recognized as the “treeless region,” instead as now, only every fourth quarter section. Such legislation would, in a few years,so change the condition of that region as to render it for all time a selt-supporting, revenue-producing region. The homes and the breeding places, and the hatching grounds of the red-legged migratory grasshopper, and of the red-skinned and migratory Sioux, would be invaded by an army of occupation come there to stay, and the ultimate results would be the settlement not only of the timber question, but of the grasshopper question, of the Indian problem, and of every variety of land grant schemes. Could Congress, by any other method, so dispose of this worse than a great blank on the map to any better advantage to the country at large? 11 162 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. A grove of ten acres of forest-timber on every quarter-section of gov- ernment prairie land would change this desolate region into a veritable garden, “the wilderness and the solitary place would rejoice and be glad thereof,” and the climatic changes resulting therefrom, would be wide- ~ spreading and of incalculable value. | An act of the legislature of Minnesota, approved February 20th, 1873, entitled “ An act to encourage the planting and growing of timber and shade trees,” offers an annual bounty of two dollars an acre, and two dollars for each half mile or more of forest-trees planted along any public highway. Stimulated by this offer, numerous parties have in good faith planted and cultivated groves of timber, and have adorned the public highways with thousands of forest-trees. The law has been largely used by railroad companies and others, as an inducement to draw emigration to the treeless portion of the State, and in many instances, with good effect. Yet, parties who have been induced by the terms of this act to invest their time and money in tree-planting, after three years of patient labor and waiting, are coolly informed that there is, in no way, for them to get their promised bounty. I submit that such legislation is due these parties as will enable the State to keep its solemn promises and promptly redeem its pledges. As it now stands on our statutes, it is a fraud; a delusion, and a snare to the unwary tree- planter, and a disgrace to the State. Itexpires by its own limitations within tive years from its passage. Good faith to the men who have been induced by its promised bounties, demands prompt action from the present session of the legislature. GovERNoR.—In behalf of the Minnesota State Forestry Association, of which you are a member, in behalf of the poor, shivering, hungry pioneer settlers, living in sod cabins, in board shanties and in holes in the earth, I thank you for the interest you have manifested in the objects of this association, and for the kind words of encouragement you have used in your annual messages, in commending this work to the consid- eration of the legislature. Very respectfully, . LronarD B. Honpcss, Sec’y Minnesota State Forestry Association. Saint Paul, Feb. 9th, 1877. RELATIONS OF FORESTS TO WATER SUPPLY. Mr. Chairman and Gentlemen: “Plant trees” is the injunction we hear from almost every quarter of the civil- ized world. The Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agriculture now offers prizes for planting trees in a State in which the wanton destruction of forests has proceeded almost for centuries. The people of the United States, having thinned the forests of the Appalachian slopes, find beyond them a vast territory destitute of forests, and offer to give it to those who will plant one quarter of it to trees. The State of Iowa gives a certain exemption from taxation for the planting of trees, and her Horticultural Society offers premiums for the encouragement of the same work. The State of California offers premiums for the same purpose, and Nebraska has its “Arbor Day.” Minnesota has laws encouraging the same work in a similar manner, and a Forestry Association is devoting its energies toward the same end. Editors and writers in agricultural papers, teachers and fruit growers are con- stant in their appeals to plant forests and protect from waste those we now haye. FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 163 Our friend Hodges for years has pressed upon our attention the necessity of planting trees in Minnesota. Met on every side by these appeals, we ask, “What is the use of planting trees?” Have forests anything to do with the moral, physical or pecuniary interests of men? Do they mitigate or correct any evils? Do they confer any benefits or exert any beneficial influence? We may approach these questions by ascertaining the objections urged against certain sections of country, by noting the unfavorable reports and the appeals that reach our ears from different parts of the inhabited world. Talk to the immigrant about settling in the prairie counties west of the Big Woods, and if he knows anything of that treeless region, he will probably object: 1) That the winds are too violent. 2) That there is no wood for fuel, and no material for fencing. 3) That the landscape is too dreary and monotonous—there are no trees to give it a home-like appearance; it is too lonesome. 5 That it is too cold out there. (5) That you cannot raise fruit there. Talk to him of some places, and he will object: (6) That they are unhealthy. Reports come to us: (7) That the forests that now supply us with lumber for building and manufac- turing purposes, are fast melting away before the woodsman’s axe. (8) The reports of destructive insect invasions have not yet ceased to vibrate in our ears. Every year we hear: (9) Of hail storms doing extensive injuries. (10) Of floods and freshets carrying away bridges and dwellings, and destroy- ing growing crops and human life. I1) Of the injurious effects of long continued drought. (12) Of the substitution of improved water wheels for those that formerly gave sufficient power, and finally the complete substitution of steam for water power in mills and manufactories. Every year we listen to: (13) Appeals for the improvement of commercial water routes. All these objections, reports and appeals indicate imperfections that are com- monly supposed to be without natural remedy ; but it is claimed for forests, and with good reason too, that they are the natural remedy for some of these imper- fections, and the natural means of relief in the case of others. It is claimed for forests that they (1) Break the force and meet the fury of the winds, and thus afford shelter and protection to man and beast. (2) That they supply fuel and material for fencing. (3) That they give a home-like character to the prairie that is otherwise dreary and monotonous. (4) That they mitigate the cold of winter and the heat of summer. (5) That they improve the conditions for fruit growing. (6) That they improve the sanitary character of some localities. (7) That they supply lumber for building and manufacturing purposes. (8) That they diminish insect injuries, and (9) The injuries of hail storms. It is claimed that forests affect favorably the water supply of a region: (10) Diminish the destructive effects of freshets, (11) Diminish the injurious effects of drought, (12) Increase the flow of springs, (13) Equalize the quantity of water in our mill and navigable streams, and (14) Distribute the rainfall throughout the year. It has been abundantly shown, in this and other States, that trees can be grown, in large numbers or in small, on any soil that will produce ordinary. farm crops. This is all that is required to establish several of the above claims. Every one has observed the capacity of trees: (1) To break the force of winds, (2) To supply fuel and material for fencing, (3) To furnish lumber for building and manufacturing. All who have traveled over the prairies know how welcome is the sight of 164 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. a belt or group of trees. and how much more habitable and home-like is a house surrounded with trees than one standing alone. (4) If forests break the force of winds, we are prepared to understand how they mitigate the cold, for we all know how much colder it seems in windy than in’ calm weather. Some of you have noticed the difference in passing from forest to open country. Firemen on railway trains observe that additional fuel is required to keep up steam on passing from wooded into prairie regions. (5) If forests break the force of winds and modify the cold of winter, they cer- tainly improve the conditions for the growth of fruit. Horticulturists are pretty well agreed upon the value of a protecting forest, either natural or artificial. f (6) Ina paper read before the American Public Health Association, last fall, Dr. Geo. L. Andrew reached, among other conclusions, the following: that “forests and tree-belts are of undoubted value in preventing the dissemination of mal- aria;” that “trees are of positive sanitary value in affording shelter from the excessive heat of the sun, from the violence of winds, and in promoting esthetic culture ;” that in some cases “extensive tree planting is not unaccompanied with evil.” (8) There is little doubt but that forests diminish insect injuries. Insects do not multiply so rapidly in and near the woods, for there the birds, the consumers of insects, build their nests and find protection. Marsh says: “It is only since the felling of the forests of Asia Minor and Cyrene that the locust has become so fearfully destructive in those countries.” It is pretty well established too, that the native breeding places of our locust are barren plains and not forest covered regions. I think it has been found, too. that the locust plague is less severe in and near forests than on the open prairies. There is good evidence to the effect that (8) forests render hail storms less frequent and severe. Hail storms on the plains of Lombardy are believed to be more frequent than before the clearing of the forests on the Alps and Appenines, and in several other provinces of Europe hail storms are believed to be more frequent and destructive since the clearing of the forests in their vicinity. I fear I have presumed greatly on your patience in presenting this lengthy introduction before entering on the more lengthy discussion of the relations of forests to water supply. This topic embraces, first, the influence of forests on rainfall and evaporation, including the influence on droughts; and second, the influence of forests on drain age, including the influence on springs, streams and lakes. One word as to the character of our knowledge on this subject. It is not abso- lutely perfect. Itis not entirely beyond doubt or question. We observe certain facts in connection with certain other facts, but we are not positive that one is the cause of the other. We observe springs ceasing to flow and streams diminishing and this keeping steady pace with the destruction of the forests. We confidently believe the destruction of the forests causes the diminished water supply, but this result may possibly be caused by geological changes in the crust of the earth. Hence the evidence I shall present you will consist in part of the convictions of men best qualified by their study of the subject to judge ; in part of observed facts which may possibly admit of question or of different explanations ; and in part of experiments which appear to be, and probably are, correct and reliable ; and, we may add, the support of our knowledge relating to the laws and condi- tions of rainfall and evaporation. In advance I wish to acknowledge my indebtedness to the volume entitled “Man and Nature” by Hon Geo. P. Marsh, in which I find the fullest discussion of this subject, and from which I have quoted copiously in the following pages. THE RELATIONS OF FORESTS TO RAINFALL. RBoussingault, a noted French authority on rural subjects, quotes another French writer who says “that at Malta rain has become so rare, since the woods were cleared to make room for the growth of cotton, that at the time of his visit in October, 1841, not a drop of rain had fallen for three years.” Boussingault further savs. “The terrible droughts which desolate the Cape Verd Islands, must also be attributed to the destruction of forests. In the Island of St. Helena, where the wooded surface has considerably extended within a few years, it has been obser- ved that the rain has increased in the same proportion. It is now in quantity double what it was during the residenceof Napoleon. In Egypt recent plantations oe FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 165 have caused rains which hitherto were aimost unknown.” But in commenting on this testimony, Marsh says we have no evidence that Malta ever had any for- ests. In 1611 there were few trees there but such as bear fruit. The other state- ments referred to, have not been questioned. Schacht, a German writer, draws the following reasonable conclusions from well known facts: “The forest, presenting a considerable surface for evaporation gives to its own soil and to all the adjacent ground an abundant and enlivening dew. * * * * This increased deposition of dew on the neighboring fields, is partly due to the forests themselves; for the dense, saturated strata of air which - hover over the woods, descend in cool, calm evenings, like clouds to the valley, and in the morning beads of due sparkle on the leaves of the grass and the flowers of the field.” Caultas, reasoning from established facts, thus concludes: “The ocean, winds and woods may be regarded as the several parts of a grand distillatory apparatus. The sea is the boiler in which vapor is raised by the solar heat, the winds are the guiding tubes which carry the vapor with them to the forests where a lower tem- perature prevails. This naturally condenses the vapor, and showers of rain are thus distilled from the cloud masses which float in the atmosphere, by the woods beneath them.” This may sound like a pretty fancy but concerning many of the facts there is not a particle of question. Thesea, together with lakes is the boiler from which arises the vapor which later forms the rain falling on our fields. The winds are the guiding tubes which carry this vapor and distribute it over the earth. Reason and experiment both prove that in summer forests do make the. air in and about them cooler than in the open country. And itis beyond ques- tion, too, that this cooling influence is exactly what is wanted to cause the fall of . rain. But the doubtful point is whether this influence of the forest is ever act- ually sufficient to cause a fall of rain that would not otherwise occur. Sir John F. W. Herschel, enumerates among “the influences unfavorable to rain, absence of vegetation in warm climates, and especially of tree. This is, no doubt, “ continues he,” one of the causes of the extreme aridity of Spain. The hatred of a Spaniard toward a tree, is proverbial. Many districts in France have been materially injured by denudation, and, on the other hand, rain has become more frequent in Egypt, since the more vigorous cultivation of the palm tree.” “Hohenstein remarks: ‘With respect to the temperature in the forest, I have already observed, that at certain times of the day and of the year, it is less than in the open field. Hence, the woods may,in the day time,in summer and toward the close of winter, tend to increase the fall of rain ; but it is otherwise in summer nights, and at the beginning of winter, when there is a higher temper- ature in the forest, which is not favorable to that effect. * * * * The wood is, further, like the mountain, a mechanical obstruction to the motion of rain- clouds, and, as it checks them in their course, it gives them occasion to deposit. their water. These considerations render it probable that the forest increases the quantity of rain ; but they do not establish the certainty of this conclusion.” Barth, after describing the conditions of soil and atmosphere produced by forests, says: Thus,a constant evaporation is produced, which keeps the forest atmosphere moist, even in long droughts, when all other sources of humidity in the forest itself, are dried up. * * * * Little is required to compel the stratum of air resting upon a wood to give up its moisture, which thus, as rain, fog, or dew, is returned to the forest. * * * * *,. The warm, moist currents - of air, which come from other regions are cooled as they approach the wood, by its less heated atmosphere, and obliged to let fall the humidity with which they are charged. * * * * *. In consequence of these relations of the forest to humidity, it follows that wooded districts have both more frequent and more abundant rain, and, in general, are more humid, than woodless regions ; for, what is true of the woods themselves, in this respect, is true, also, of their treeless neighborhood. * * * *. When the districts stripped of trees, have long been deprived of rain and dew, * * * * and the grass and the fruits of the field are ready to wither, the grounds which are surrounded by woods, are green and flourishing.” This, you will observe, is a purely theoretical conclusion. Asbjornsen, who, like the last, is a Scandinavian writer, says: “The narratives of travellers show the deplorable consequences of felling the woods in the Island of Trinidad. Martinique, San Domingo, and, indeed, in almost the entire West Indian group. * * * * In Palestine, and many other parts of Asia and Northern Africa, which, in ancient times, were the granaries of Europe, fertile and populous, similar consequences haye been experienced. These lands are 166 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. _ how deserts, and it is the destruction of the forests alone which has produced this desolation. * * *. In Southern France, many districts have, from the same cause, become barren wastes of stone, and the cultivation of the vine and the olive has suffered severely since the baring of the neighboring mountains. Since the extensive clearings between the Spree and the Oder, the inhabitants complain that the clover crop is much less productive than before. On the other hand, examples of the beneficial influence of planting and restoring the woods are not wanting. In Scotland, where many miles square have been planted with trees, the effect has been manifest, and similar observations have been made in several places in Southern France. In Lower Egypt, both at Cairo, and near Alexandria, rain rarely fell in considerable quantity—for example, during the French occupation of Egypt, about 1798, it did not rain for sixteen months; but since Mehemet Ali and Abrahim Pacha, executed their vast plantations, * * * there, now, falls a good deal of rain, especially along the coast, in the months of November, December and January, and even at Cairo, it rains both oftener and more abundantly, so that real showers are no variety.” Babinet, a French writer, says: “The forests of the Vasges and Ardennes, produce the same effect,’ (increased rain-fall), “in the north-east of France, and send us a great river, the Meuse, which is as remarkable for its volume as for the small extent of its basin. Babinet repeats the suggestion of Mignet, that, to produce a rain, a forest was as good as a mountain,” and he adds, “this is literally true.” Another French writer says: “For it is established that in wooded countries, it rains oftener, and, that the quantity of rain being equal, they are more humid.” Boussingault, who is an authority in agricultural science, thus sums up:— ‘“ Arguing from the meteorological facts collected in the agricultural regions, there is reason to presume that clearings diminish the annual fall of rain.” And again he says: “In my judgment, it is settled, that very large clearings must diminish the anuual fall of rain in a country. Marsh, also, gives us the other side of the story. Hesays: “On the other hand, Faissac expresses the opinion, that forests have no influence on precipita- tion, beyond that of promoting the deposit of dew in their vicinity, and he states, as a fact of experience, that the planting of large vegetables, and especially of tree, is a very efficient means of drying morasses, because the plants draw from the earth a quantity of water larger than the average annual fall of rain. Kloden, * * * * denied that the diminution of volume “(in the Oder and Elbe),” is to be ascribed to a decrease of precipitation in consequence of the fell- ing of the forests, and states, what other physicists confirm, that, during the same period,” (since 1878,) “ meteorological records in various parts of Europe show rather an augmentation than a reduction of rain.” Marsh also, giyes the obser-. vations of Belgrond, which “tend to show, contrary to the general opinion, that less rain falls in wooded than in denuded districts. Observations were made at stations about eight miles apart in two valleys, believed to be alike in all respects, except that one was entirely bare, the other well wooded. The rain-fall was as follows: Min. For three cold months, inthe cleared valley .....-...... . .1797 ss H . S ee iwoodedks a. SCR ed MG ree nr amaic STi “ five warm “ “ “cleared ~ “ 2 oe eee 3 Ee ene ene "4 fa ef “ “wooded “ eV MeN ten UR Merinaree sre yatt % sc, L4KO VS Marsh says: “This result is so contrary to what has been generally accepted as a theoretical conclusion, that further experiment is required to determine the question.” He thus sums up the whole subject of forest influence on rain-fall : “The effect of the forest then is not entirely free from doubt, and we cannot, positively affirm, that the total annual quantity of rain is diminished or increased by the destruction of the woods, though both theoretical considerations and the balance of testimony strongly favor of the opinion, that more rain falls in wooded than in open countries. One important conclusion, at least, upon the meteorological influence of forests, is certain and undisputed; the proposition, namely, that, within their own limits, and near their own borders, they maintain « more uniform degree of humidity in the atmosphere than is observed in the cleared grounds. Scarcely less can it be questioned, that they promote the fre- quency of showers, and, if they do not augment the amount of precipitation, they equalize its distribution through the different seasons.” From other sources, we gather some evidence. Prof. Mathiews, of the School FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 167 of Forestry, near Nancy, in France, has given the results of some experiments, which have been translated by Hon. W. C. Flagg, of Illinois. For nearly three years, the rain-fall was measured at two stations, about twelve miles apart, the attitude, and all other conditions, so far as known, being the same, save, that one was in the midst of a forest plateau, and the other in the midst of a farming region. The rain-fall was as follows: Last 8 months, 1866, forest plateau, 27.25} inches, farming region. . . . 23.254 Whole year. . 1867, “ 4 36.444“ % ihe a HO hast <1 BANOS as crest: BOSE e, 29.483. “ zs Es, selaguy wet A consecutive difference in favor of the forest plateau of 4 inches, 2} inches, and 44 inches. A difference that would be considered conclusive proof by any one that is acquainted with experiments of this nature. But, you remember we did not accept, as final, the experiment giving a contrary result. So with this, we must regard it simply as one link in the chain of evidence, albeit, a strong one. Careful and thoughtful observers in this country are almost unanimous in the belief, that forests tend to a better distribution of the rain-fall, if they do not actually augment it. Prof. Riley, a few years since in a horticultural convention, expressed a doubt about the influence of forests on rain-fall, and could find no one to agree with him. Speaking of records of rain-fall, which he had prepared, Prof. F. B. Hough, says: Although they reveal great irregularities in a series of years at any given locality, they do not justify us in supposing that, in the general average of periods, the amount is sensibly increasing or diminishing, although they do show, in some _cases, greater tendencies to drouth for a series of years together, and often a more unequal distribution of rain throughout the year. This growing tendency to droughts and floods can be directly ascribed to the clearing up of wood-lands, by which the rains quickly find their way into the streams, often swelling them into destructive floods, instead of sinking into the earth to reappear as springs.” The report of a congress of land and forest-cultivators, held in Vienna, after naming many cases of the influence of forests on rain-fall already mentioned in this paper, describes and mentions the following:’ Ismalia, upon the Suez canal, was built upon a sandy desert; but since the ground has been saturated with _water, trees, bushes and plants have grown, and with the appearance of vegetation, the climate has changed. Four or five years ago, says the report, rain was unknown in these regions; but in the year, from May, 1868, to May, 1869, there were fourteen days of rain. So, also, near Trieste, a finely wooded district, was destroyed by the Venetians, and twenty-five years ago rain had ceased to fall; but, to save the country from total abandonment, the Austrian government planted several millions of olive trees. It is stated, also, that the conversion of the desert of Utah into a blooming country, has raised the Salt Lake seven feet - above its old level. The volume of water in the Ohio, is stated to be evidently diminishing. The same is true of the Hudson, upon which the extent of navi- gable water is yearly receding. “I would ask you, can it be successfully denied that the same thing is true of the Mississippi, and other streams of the State. And if not, is there any better reason for it, than the destruction of the trees at their rise, and and along their courses? Thus, it seems to me, is the influence of forests on evaporation. Every one knows that of the water falling as rain, a part sinks into the soil and a part dries away. Whatis the influence of forests on the latter part? Trees, themselves draw from the soil, through their roots large quantities of water and exhale it in the form of vapor from their leaves. For large trees the quantity exhaled is estimated at one, two and even three barrels daily when in full growth. On the other hand the shade of the branches and foliage and the coating of dead leaves on the surface of the ground by intercepting of the rays of _ the sun and keeping the ground cool, retard very greatly direct evaporation from the soil itself. Prof. Mathiew, carried his experiments to this point and he found that the evaporation in the open field was four or five times as much as from the forest. The same conditions, too, that retard evaporation, favor the absorption and condensation of vapor from the air. But the retention and acquisition of moisture by the soil, appears to be in excess of the loss by evaporation from the soil and by exhalation from the leaves combined, for the soil of the forest itself does not show the effects of drouth until long after cleared lands are dry and parcheu. Forests certainly diminish evaporation from adjacent cleared lands, 168 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. The roots of the forest trees pump no. water from these grounds and the trees diminish direct evaporation because they break the force of the winds and the drying power of wind, air in motion above that of air at rest, is well known. Thus at one end there is strong reason for believing that forests increase the fall of rain, while at the other end, they certainly diminish the loss of water by evap- oration. Such being the case forests must diminish the severity of drouth. It remains to note the influence of forests on drainage,—their effect on springs and lakes and streams and floods. The files of American agricultural journals contain many instances of springs diminishing or ceasing in their flow with the disappearance of surrounding or adjacent forests, but so far as I know these cases have never been gathered into a single volume, so that I am again obliged to bor- row European examples from Marsh’s Man and Nature. He says: As the for- ests are destroyed, the springs which flowed from the woods, and consequently the greater water course fed by them, diminish both in numberand in volume. This fact is so familiar through the American States and British Provinces, that there are few old residents of the interior of those districts who are not able to testify to its truth as a matter of personal observation. My own recollection sug- gests to me several instances of this sort, and I remember one case where asmall mountain spring, which disappeared soon after the clearing of the ground where it rose, was recovered about ten or twelve yearsago, by simply allowing the bushes and young trees to grow up on a rocky knoll, not more than half an acre in ex- tent, immediately above it, and has since continued to flow uninterruptedly. The uplands in the Atlantic States formerly abounded in sources and rills, but in many parts of those States which have been cleared for above a generation or two, the hill pastures now suffer severely from drouth, and ia dry seasons no longer afford either water or herbage for cattle.” Clane gives an example in the forest of Mendon near Paris, and says: “After a few rainy days pass along the Chevreuse road, which is bordered on the right by the wood, on the left by cultivated fields. The fall of water and the continuance of the rain have been the same on both sides; but the ditch on the side of the forest will remain filled with water proceeding from the infiltration through the wooded soil, long after the other, contiguous to the open ground, has performed its office of drainage and become dry. The ditch on the left will have discharged in a few hours a quantity of water, which the ditch on the right requires several days to receive and carry down to the valley.” Another case “before the felling of the woods, within the last few years * * * the same furnished a regular and sufficient supply of water for the iron works of Unterwyl, which was almost unaffected by drought or by heavy rains. The same has now become a torrent, every shower occasions a flood, and after a few days of fine weather, the current falls so low that it has been necessary to change the water wheels, because those of the old construction are no longer able to drive the machinery, and at last to introduce a steam engine to prevent the stoppage of the works for the want of water.” Another case. “When the factory of St. Ursaune was established, the river that furnished its power was abundant, long known and tried, and had from time immemorial, sufficed for the machinery of a previous factory. Afterward the woods near its sources were cut. The supply of water fell off in consequence, the factory wanted water for half the year, and was at last obliged to stop altogether.” “The Wolf Spring furnishes a remakable example of the influence of the woods upon fountains. A few years ago this spring did not exist.. At the place where it now rises, a small thread of water was observed after very long rains, but the stream dissappeared with the rain. The spot isin the middle of a very steep pas- ture inclining to the south. Eighty years ago the owner of the land, perceiving that young firs were shooting up in the upper part of it, determined to let them grow and they soon formed a flourishing grove. Assoon as they were well grown, a fine spring appeared in place of the occasional rill, and furnished abundant water in the longest droughts. For forty or fifty years this spring was considered the best in the Clos du Doubs. A few years since the grove was felled, and the ground turned again toa pasture. The spring disappeared with the wood and is now as dry as it was ninety years ago.” Marsh quotes another case in which the forest is felled in regular succession once in twenty years. “As the annual cuttings approach a certain point, the springs yield less water, some of them none at all; but as the young growth shoots up, they flow more and more freely, and at length bubble up again in all their original abundance.” “ on FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. 169 Marsh also quotes from Der. Pifer the following American example. “Within about half amile of my residence there is a pond upon which mills have been standing for a long time, dating back I believe, to the first settlement of the town. These have been kept in constant operation until within some twenty or thirty years, when the supply of water began to fail. The pond owes its existence to a stream which has its source in the hills which stretch some miles to the south. Within the time mentioned, these hills, which were clothed with .a dense forest, have been almost entirely stripped of trees; and to the wonder and loss of the mill owners, the water in the pond has failed, except in the season of freshets;. and what was never heard of before, the stream itself has been entirely dry. Within the last ten years a new growth of wood has sprung up on most of the land form- rly occupied by the old forest ; and now the water runs through the year notwith- standing the great droughts of the last few years.” A letter from Wm. C. Bryant, the poet and editor, is also quoted. “It is a common observation that our summers are become drier and our streams smaller. Take the Cuyahoga as an illustration. Fifty years ago, large barges loaded with goods, went up and down that river, and one of the vessels engaged in the battle of Lake Erie, in which the gallant Perry was victorious, was built at Old Portage, six miles north of Albion, and floated down to the lake. Now, in an ordinary stage of water, a canoe or skiff can hardly pass down the stream. Many a boat of fifty tons burden has been built and loaded in the Tuscarawas, at New Portage, and sailed to New Orleans without breaking bulk. Now, the river hardly affords a supply of water, at New Portage, for the canal. The same may be said of other streams—they are drying up. And from the same cause, the destruction of our forests, our summers are growing drier, and our winters colder.” Other cases might be added, but it is unnecessary. Those given are in accordance with reason. The soil of forests is nearly always more open and porous, than that of cleared land. So that rain, instead of flowing off as it falls, sinks into the soil to reappear gradually in the springs that feed the rivulets and irrigate the meadows. Besides, the porosity of the soil, the surface is covered with leaves and twigs and roots, which impede the flow of water over the surface and cause it to sink away into the soil. Snow fall- ing in the woods does not melt away so suddenly, as on cleared land, and the water from it reaches the streams later than that from the cleared lands, thus diminishing the height, but prolonging the period of high water. And now, in conclusion, I would ask. In view of the opinions of those well qualified to judge, and in view of the facts cited,can it be doubted that the unsparing destruction of forests is attended with disastrous results? In view of the same, and of other facts stated in this paper, can it be doubted that the plant- ing of forests, in treeless regions, especially, will be attended with equally good results? Can it be doubted that extensive tree-planting will improve the distri- bution of, if not actually augment the annual rain-fall. Can it be doubted, that it will diminish the devastation of freshets, and shorten the duration of drouths? Can it be doubted, that it will maintain the number and volume of our springs ; equalize the supply of water in our lakes and streams, and thus preserve naviga- tion in our inland streams, and power for our mills and manufactories? I have tried to put you in possession of the facts, gentlemen, I leave it to your judg- ments to answer these questions. What the Minnesota State Forestry Association ‘did to aid the grass- hopper sufferers in 1877. The spring of 1877 opened inauspiciously for the tree planters of Minnesota. Those on the great prairies had been harrassed by grasshop- - pers, machine agents and creditors, “till they couldn’t rest.” Discouraged and disheartened by repeated losses and failures, many who had in good faith entered timber claims, were on the point of aban- doning them from sheer inability to purchase the much needed trees and cuttings for immediate planting. Sn I was overwhelmed with letters from such parties asking for aid. Call- ing the executive committee of the Association together, they appropri- ated a small amount for the purchase and distribution of trees and cut- tings to the most unfortunate of the applicants. fy 12 170 FOREST TREE PLANTERS’ MANUAL. I immediately addresed a circular letter to all the County commission- — ers of the treeless counties, asking them to forward the names of worthy parties, who having in good faith entered timber claims and by reason of grasshopper damages were unable to plant, and were thereby in emi- nent danger of loosing their claims—to forward the names of such only as would if aided, so apply the aid as to carry out the provisions of the timber culture act, and thereby save their claims. . In response thereto several hundred names were forwarded to me by the Commissioners. Of these one hundred and seventy-three applicants were aided to an extent sufficient to save their tree claims. Three hundred and thirty-eight thousand (338.000) white willow and cottonwood cuttings, and one hundred and eighty thousand (180.000) ash and cottonwood trees, were thus distributed, and one hundred and seventy three good men relieved and encouraged to prosecute their good work at the expense of the State of $534.12. The timber for the 338.C00 cuttings and 120.000 of these trees were generously donated to the Association by the St. Paul & Pacific Rail- road company. . In the spring of 1878, the Association offered $1,800.00 in premiums to be distributed in accordance with the rules and regulations as published in compliance with the law granting the appropriation. The tree planters competing therefor generally, ignored the prescribed rules and regulations, and of the $1,080.00 so offered, but $135,00 was awarded. With this experience before them, the Executive Committee have not up to this writing made up a premium list for 1879. : The cost of preparation, publication and distribution of this pamphlet, will probably be of as much service to forest culture in Minnesota, as the same amount would be if distributed in premiums. I have for many years collected and carevully preserved thousands of items bearing on forestry ; and from this varied mass have selected such as seemed to me practical and reliable. I could have more easily embod- ied twice as much. The great difficulty has been to throw overboard much that was worthy of preservation, but which we could possibly do without. In these pages will be found sufficient information to enable any one of average ablility to grow his own fuel, shelter and shade. I have aimed to give just the information called for in the thous- ands of letters I have received on this subject, and can only say to enquirers, study this little work thoroughly and you will find therein a substantial answer to all reasonable interrogatories. In conclusion, I wish to, so faras possible, make amends for the whole- sale raid I have hereby made in pursuit of knowledge under difficulties. I acknowledged to having plundered every available source of informa- tion for what I was after, and now having obtained it and spread it among the people, plead Pro Bono Publico as my excuse. If I have done wrong I am willing to be forgiven. This work has been rushed through at railroad speed, in hurried moments snatched from pressing duties. I have pursued it con amore, and hereby dedicate it to the great any of tree planters in Minnesota, with the smgle word PERSEVER- Saint Paul, Minnesota March, 19th, 1879. INDEX. Preface. Prepraation of the soil . . 4 Time to break prairie. prison gael ay Notg tenis, pe NSRE omayaniis, obRapye tee ce j 4 Manner of breaking prairie. . Eile ek cviliis Cheb inch pion woe Veo aM Sa ert? Mie Uae Ems revere 4 (Cliszmn eulltuins Wieser ia Ge Neon On oe) Gk OMOn OL Ode: mac) to NGliaon so tac 4 Proper treatment of cold, sour, level prairie. ©. 2... 2 se eee ees 5 Its great value when regenerated, and its adaptability ‘to trees, wheat, grasses and other crops. buitio eas. qo eben 6 Ap Co Ines Syeg bea . 5 HEMMeTOtyplantings \ricwe. | 4) avebver ier wie Sattaw cel wecrermte eM brejnra Vag so loko 5 Objects of tree planting. 5 esky lieianearagee Ue eum eI 7 Close planting. aero maa CeO Sood aac 6 Proper distribution of trees when planted . SE arena TiCeTOR eh TeickS Gaels tktC BARGER oved 6 Nature’s method of planting. See pon silt ee SOE cia oes Gane Rt aiies 7 Development of grub-prairie into Be TA, Grok) Baste ns aR es 6 Varieties of trees suitable for forest culture in Minnesota. ......... ch is 8 Varieties of trees suitable for planting along highways ........++4... 8 Metessouithe Bis Woods) by, ProfivN? El. Wanchell . 5.0

—— ad — ——— nd —_—= ——— — —_ SS ——_ —- —__ a ld ———— —————F ————— —————— ——— —————d ed ——————— ————d —— ——————d