> f i t^^^^l m i I FORMAL DESIGN IN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FORMAL DESIGN IN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE A Statement of Principles with Special Reference to Their Present Use in America By FRANK A. WAUGH 4 Illustrated New York ORANGE JUDD PUBLISHING COMPANY, Inc. London KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH, TRUBNER & CO., Ltd. 1927 SB Copyright, 1927, by ORANGE JUDD PUBLISHING COMPANY. Inc. COPYRIGHT IN GREAT BRITAIN Printed in the United States of America Inscribed to Professor James Sturgis Pray Teacher of Landscape Architecture |5l3|fc PROGRAM Preface 11 I. Formal Design 15 11. The Rectangular Garden ... 27 III. The Domestic Formula ... 41 IV. Radial Design 53 V. Spirit and Motive 65 VI. Treatment of the Land ... 77 VII. Enclosure 89 VIII. Walks and Pavings 109 IX. Shelter 119 X. Tables and Chairs 131 XI. Plastic Figures 141 XII. Water 153 XIII. Roses and Flowerbeds .... 169 XIV. The Front Yard 181 Index 189 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS HALF-TONE PLATES Home Garden, "Domestic Formula" .... Frontispiece FACING PAGE Corner of Garden i6 Simple Furnishings on a Home Lawn . . . . . . 17 Formal Treatment of a California Home 17 Highly Formal Architectural Grouping with Water and Grass 22 Modern Domestic Example from California 23 Classical Design, Rectangular Formula, Amherst, Mass. . . 28 A Formal Mall in a Pasadena, California, Estate ... 29 Severely Formal Rectangular Garden Featuring Box Edgings 38 "Brookside" — Mr. Ferruccio Vitale, Landscape Architect . 39 Garden Panel 42 Spanish Style in California 42 Garden Plan on the "Domestic Formula." By Mr. Daniel Chester French 43 Grass Panel in Small Garden 48 Intimate Home Garden in Pasadena, California. Mr. Paul Thiene, Landscape Architect 49 Circular Pattern Bedding on a City Boulevard, Houston, Texas • • 54 Model for a Circular Rose Garden 54 Semi-Circular Exhedra in a Massachusetts Garden . . 55 Mexican Motives in a California Garden 68 Semi-Classical Treatment of Simple Elements .... 69 Balustrade and Steps 7^ Terminal Feature on Main Axis 72 Bungalow Court in Hollywood, California 73 One Section of Domestic Garden 73 Level Panel. Mr. Jens Jensen, Landscape Architect . . 80 8 List of Illustrations FACING PAGE A Balustraded Terrace 8i Smooth Grass Panel with Flower Borders 8i Bird Fountain in a Small Domestic Garden 84 Grass Panel Giving Breadth in a Small Garden ... 85 Garden Wall with Gate 90 Wall with Bordering Pergola. Olmsted Bros., Landscape Architects 91 Garden Enclosed by Hedge; Design by Mr. Daniel Chester French 96 Garden of Mr. Daniel Chester French Enclosed by Brick Wall and Plantings 97 Grass Walk, "Brookside." Mr. Ferruccio Vitale, Land- scape Architect no Brick Walk to Front Entrance 110 Brick Walk with Grass Verge and Flower Border . . .111 Cement Mall, Forsyth Square, Savannah, Ga ill Good Gravel Walk, Charleston, S. C 116 Brick Walks and Edgings with Box Borders . . . .117 Formal Garden Pool and Shelter, Pasadena, California . .120 Garden Pool; Shelter; Brick Walks 121 Home-Made Chairs and Table 132 Chairs and Table Terminating Axis 133 A Public Tea Garden, Nantucket, Mass 136 Garden Seat and Table 137 Entrance to Rose Garden, Garfield Park, Chicago. Mr. Jens Jensen, Landscape Architect 142 Buergerwiese, Dresden, Germany 143 Grouping in Classical Style, Philadelphia 148 Garden of Mr. Myron Hunt, Pasadena, Calif 149 Memorial, The Paseo, Kansas City. Mr. George E. Kessler, Landscape Architect 149 Wall Fountain, Maxwell Court. Mr. Charles A. Piatt, Architect 156 Garden Fountain, Grosvenor Garden, Amherst, Mass. . .157 Marble Fountain with Sculpture 162 Formal Pool with Fountain and Plantings 163 lo List of Illustrations FACING FAGS Rose Garden, Garfield Park, Chicago. Mr. Jens Jensen, Landscape Architect 170 Rose Garden in Ipswich, Mass. Mr. Arthur A. Shurtleff, Landscape Architect 171 Formal Flower Beds, The Pasco, Kansas City. Mr. Geo. E. Kessler, Landscape Architect 174 Simple Formal Flower Garden in Pasadena, California . 175 A Colonial Front Yard, Nantucket, Mass 182 Old Colonial Yard and Doorway, Nantucket, Mass. . .183 Colonial Style, Doorway, Hedged Yard and Brick Walk, Amherst, Mass 186 Fence and Gates, Charleston, S. C 187 Front Doorway with Paved Court 187 ILLUSTRATIONS IN TEXT PAGE Horshoe Farm, Rapidan, Va 21 Example of the Domestic Garden 50 The Rose Garden 59 The Vegetable Garden Treated with Simple Formality . . 66 Kent County War Memorial 75 Simple Formal Garden with Well-Placed Walks and Good Enclosure 97 A Garden Shelter Terminating a Principal Axis . . .124 The Water Mirror 154 Pool Used with Principal Terminus 158 Old Fashion Garden Knots 178 PREFACE N THIS book no attempt has been made to present the history of formal gardening. Yet formal gardening las a history — a long and fascinating tale not devoid of significance for the Amer- ican garden maker in the present exigent twentieth century. That history, however, has been frequently recounted by those who are more proficient than the present writer in all its details. It is hardly necessary now to rehearse or even to reinterpret the story of that famous past. At the present moment it seems more profit- able to inquire what this art of formal garden- ing means to America — to a land far, far removed from ancient Greece, from the glor- ious field of the Renaissance, from the wild dreams of the Louis of France and even from the achievements of Englishmen in Eliza- bethan Britain. What has the formal garden to offer to men and women who ride in auto- mobiles and aeroplanes, who talk by telephone and sing by radio, who live on the plains of Texas, on the shores of Long Island or in the multitudinous bungalows of Hollywood? 12 Preface Nothing could be plainer, one would think, than that the old gardens of France and Italy could not be copied in America. The details can not be reproduced, the forms will not fit. But more than that, and altogether more con- sequential, the spirit is utterly different. And if one wishes to express the spirit of his own time and country, so immeasurably alien to the spirit of the Old World, there must posi- tively be a new beginning. One must start afresh from the new spirit and build upon that. One can put new wine into old bottles easier than a new spirit into century-old garden forms. Yet of course there are some principles in art that are universal and as permanent as the human race. These principles guided the Greeks and perhaps they will guide the New Yorkers and the Missourians and the Cali- fornians if we in our day will be as attentive to sound logic as were our great predecessors. Certainly it will be worth trying. To state these principles in the simplest pos- sible way and to show how they work out under the conditions of modern life in Amer- ica is the sole purpose of the present volume. To be intelligible rather than profound, to Preface 13 realize all systems in terms of the present time and place, to find some way in which our own homes may grow in beauty more largely expressing the spiritual grace and power which is their ultimate character — this is certainly a sufficient ambition, even if his- tory and philosophy be omitted and modern illustrative examples left to the many books already presenting them. Frank A. Waugh FORMAL DESIGN |UST what is a formal garden? The answer is not difficult. A formal gar- den is simply one in which the parts are symmetrically balanced. There is balance, too, in the best informal gardening, but the balance is less obvious. It is never gained by placing one object directly over against its exact mate, as is the rule in formal balance. Symmetry is of several kinds, but for most practical purposes these may be reduced to two, viz., bilateral symmetry and radial sym- metry. Bilateral symmetry is that type of structure in which each part is repeated on either side of a median line. It is represented by the human body with its left hand exactly balanc- ing its right, each eye, ear, rib, having its mate on the opposite side. The human figure may thus be expressed in a simple diagram with the backbone for the central line upon which the symmetry is built. All the higher animals are projected on the 15 i6 Formal Design same principle of bilateral symmetry. It is a model widely used by nature, especially in her most ambitious attempts. The same principle has been very widely adopted by man in the practical and decorative arts. A steamship is bilaterally symmetrical; so is an automobile, with the exception of quite minor details; so is an ax, a revolver, a suit- case, a chair, a loaf of bread, a cravat pin and a thousand other manufactured articles of daily use. Apparently the human mind in working out these patterns has sometimes been imitating nature, either consciously or uncon- sciously. At other times the mind has been guided by purely mathematical principles of structure or purely decorative principles of design. Just how the race, working through ages of experiment, has reached its goal of bilateral symmetry in this case and in that doesn't much matter. The great fact is that this type of organization is widely accepted as natural, as structurally sound, as pleasing to the human mind. Radial symmetry is that type of structure in which parts are repeated circularly about a center instead of along opposite sides of a line. Abundant examples are to be found in nature, Corner of Garden — See Plan, Page 50. Simple Furnishings on a Home Lawn- Formal Treatment of a California Home Formal Design IJ as the starfish, the snowflake, many flowers and most crystals. Abundant examples are seen also in the arts. Each button, dinner plate, watch, lamp-shade and a hundred other similar articles are circular in form and are often decorated upon their surfaces with fig- ures repeated round the center. So this type of symmetry also has been adopted by the mind of man as natural, struc- turally safe and pleasing to the eye. When we speak of a formal garden, there- fore, we mean one in which the ground plan is symmetrical, and this symmetry may be of any kind, though practically always it will be either bilateral or radial. Indeed in formal gardening there is fre- quently a sort of double symmetry. In a large number of cases the garden is built upon two axes placed at right angles to each other. It may be symmetrical to both axes ; or it may be completely symmetrical upon the major axis and partially symmetrical with respect to the minor axis. (See page 31.) In books on landscape architecture a great deal has been written about the formal "style". This has also sometimes been called the Italian style, and again the architectural style. All i8 Formal Design these terms are objectionable. No terms have been found, in fact, wholly pleasing and ac- curate. In such cases the simplest language is nearly always the best. Thus perhaps it is most satisfactory to speak plainly of formal gardening. If we must say anything more we may call it a mode of design rather than a style of gardening. POETRY AND MUSIC In all the other fine arts, just as in landscape architecture, both symmetrical and asymmet- rical types of design are employed. The paral- lelism is significant and at some points helpful to the garden designer. In literature prose and poetry represent re- respectively the asymmetrical and the symmet- rical modes of composition — the informal and the formal. Good prose follows its own laws of structure quite as strictly as poetry, yet the result is less regular and in a sense more nat- ural. Poetry is formal and in exactly the same way that some gardens are formal. Lines of equal length are balanced against one another ; cadences balance and rhymes terminate verses. Some of the ablest poets, not satisfied with all Formal Design 19 this symmetry, have so constructed their stan- zas that one idea balances against another. Even some of the wild iconoclastic writers of modern free verse differ from the conserva- tives only in that they aim at a balance of ideas or of cadences instead of a balance of rhymes or meters. Music of all arts is nearest in spirit to land- scape architecture and has most to teach the spiritually-minded garden designer. In struc- ture, too, as well as in spirit, music is much like the garden art. There is first the asym- metrical form in which cadences are free and irregular instead of balanced ("sonata form", symphonic music), and there is secondly the more common lyric and dance music made up of symmetrically balanced cadences and of equal periods. To follow out this comparison would carry us quite too far afield; but one important analogy ought to be noted. It will readily be agreed that poetry is generally suited for the expression of simple ideas in short form, while for the treatment of complicated ideas in ex- tenso, prose is much better suited. A modern poem rarely grows to a length of more than a page, condensation being considered obliga- 20 Formal Design tory. If one were to attempt to make a book of 600 pages in explanation of Einstein he would certainly not write it in poetry. Likewise in music, church hymns, simple songs and dances practically have to be con- structed in formal periods. The rhythms must be equally measured and must balance. But the ambitious composer of a large work, like an opera or a symphony, must adopt a much freer and more "natural" style. He would use a variety of rhythms, would give us ca- dences of divers lengths, and would not feel in the least obliged to cut up his score into periods of equal measure. All of which states with equal accuracy the position of the landscape architect. For small areas where attention is closely focused, the formal treatment is best — all conditions being normal. While for areas measured in acres or square miles the informal "natural" style is almost inevitable. One could hardly think of applying a system of formal landscape de- sign to the Grand Canyon or to the Adiron- dack State Forest Preserve. The fact that the formal garden grows out of precisely the same principles of design as poetry and lyric music is at least suggestive. Formal Design 21 d^-^ Horshoc Farm, Rapidan, Va. No scale 22 Formal Design The additional fact that this similarity extends beyond physical structure is even more im- portant, implying that the spirit of the formal garden must resemble the spirit of poetry and of lyric music. Indeed there is more than an implication here. We may say with perfect confidence that the formal garden should always be poetic — should be lyric — should catch the same spirit which shines through the best of poetry and which sings in all simple folk-music. STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS These reflections come to their application rather easily. When we consider that no one can make poetry without knowing and observ- ing the strict rules of poetic structure (rhythm, rhyme, cadence) we ought to see that a de- cently formal garden can not be made without equally conscientious attention to inevitable principles of structural design. Some uncul- tured persons do indeed write verses in which alternate lines end in rhyme and deceive them- selves by calling it poetry. Just so there are too many hopeful citizens, of both sexes, mak- ing rhymed gardens — gardens which have a o 2 wi O ^ Formal Design 23 specious show of formality but which break all structural rules and which (what is much worse) fail utterly to capture any of the spirit of poetry. It ought not to be difficult for any serious person to see that the maker of poetry or the writer of music must know and follow certain very definite principles. It ought to be equally clear that the maker of formal gardens must know the same rules, though in a different application, and must be conscience-bound to conform to them to the utmost. And finally, of course, everyone should see that mere con- formity to rules, though it may give a struc- tural righteousness, will never breathe into any garden the living spirit of beauty. Form and spirit are both essential. No honest gar- den maker would be content with a deformed or malformed body ; nor would he be content to own a body "possessed of an evil spirit," as the Scriptures so aptly phrase it. And we may say this, at least, for encourage- ment, that the poet or the garden maker who strives for perfection of form, is more likely to find his endowment of spiritual inspiration than the slovenly worker who disregards sound structure or the ignoramus who does 24 Formal Design not know that structure grows logically from universal principles. It is plain truth to say that the further exten- sion of formal gardening in America depends upon a wider understanding of these princi- ples. It is the aim of succeeding chapters to formulate these principles and to make clear their application in landscape architecture. AVAILABILITY In times now fortunately past there was a vitriolic controversy in England and America over the respective merits of the "natural style" and the "formal style." One party as- serted dogmatically that the natural style was better because it was natural — that whatever was artificial was necessarily bad. The oppos- ing party with equal intolerance insisted that every garden had to be an improvement on nature; that because houses, lands and streets were rectangular, gardens must be; that for- mal gardens were more elaborate, more curi- ous, more interesting. At the present time all honest men are agreed that informal design (the natural style) is better for some places and purposes, while formal design is better Formal Design 25 for Others. It remains only to determine what mode of treatment will best fit given circum- stances, and further what degree of formality or what degree of naturalness may be achieved under existing conditions. The theory that one mode is inherently better than the other is a wholly untenable prejudice. One might as well assert that prose is better than poetry and that therefore poetry should be abolished. The present writer is of the opinion, how- ever, that formal gardening has suffered a comparative neglect in America. Reasons for such neglect are easy to give, — so easy that they need not be recorded. If the idea, already stated, that every method of gardening is to be accepted strictly on its merits, the way is open for the best possible practice in the future. Under such an unprejudiced view it ought to be clear that there are many combinations of practical circumstances which call for for- mal landscape design. A long avenue or mall is necessarily formal; a small city square is positively formal and any naturalistic land- scape gardening on such a site is absurd; a small cemetery, strictly subdivided into little lots and blocks and filled with architectural monuments, can hardly be made into an in- 26 Formal Design formal picture. Perhaps most of all will it appear that the small rectangular areas into which the average home lot naturally divides are clearly adapted to simple forms of sym- metrical development, as are likewise the smaller areas of college campuses and many other tracts, public and private, with which amateur and professional landscape architects have to deal. II THE RECTANGULAR GARDEN ULES in art are always dangerous. Their application is often doubtful, I and the best of rules are cheerfully defied by the best artists. Nevertheless rules may be useful for the beginner; and the settled worker comes to have rules of his own. It is only fair, indeed, to recognize certain structural principles, some of which at least are capable of general state- ment. And if there be exceptions to these rules they are for the man who knows and who may safely be a law unto himself. With these limitations clearly in view the following rules are offered for the guidance of those who need them. Now in making formal gardens it works out nine times out of ten that the area to be used is rectangular. Or if it is not strictly rectangular it can easily be made to approxi- mate that form. For the design of a garden in this figure a fairly simple formula may be given — subject, of course, to the qualifications offered above. 28 The Rectangular Garden SIZE First of all we have to consider size. For- mal gardening should be attempted only on relatively small areas. For the ordinary family garden one quarter acre would be the maxi- mum allowance; for a very pretentious pri- vate mansion one to two acres; in elaborate public grounds including monumental public buildings three or four acres might possibly be used. But these figures are maxima, and best results will nearly always be realized upon areas much smaller. Consider briefly what these quantities mean. For rough estimating one acre may be taken as a square 200 feet on a side. (This is slightly less than an acre, but near enough for garden estimates.) Thus we see that a plot of ground 200 by 100 feet would be one half an acre; one 200 x 50 feet would be one quarter of an acre. But as 200 x 50 feet is rather more than the size of an average town lot, we can readily accept the rule that the ordinary family will find a quarter of an acre the maximum size for a formal garden. A garden 30 x 50 feet therefore would con- form more nearly to the dimensions common- ly available ; and though this is only about one- < Qi w u The Rectangular Garden 29 twenty-seventh of an acre it is enough to yield a very decent effect. Indeed a little garden of this size can be made very delightful and wholly satisfactory. There is great danger in gardens of this type of laying out too large a space; the tendency to err at the opposite ex- treme is almost negligible. EXTERNAL FORM The area must be rectangular, or nearly so. Slight deviations from strict geometrical form are not noted by the eye and are not objection- able. It is often practicable to make a rectangular area suitable for a formal garden upon a tract of irregular form by the simple expedient of cutting off the irregular ^portions for other uses. This process works toward a reduction in the size of the formal garden and is there- fore usually advantageous. At the same time it may lead toward the definition of boundaries by fences or other enclosures, and that step will always yield a further benefit to the gar- den design. For it is strictly necessary that the formal garden be enclosed. (See Chapter VII.) 30 The Rectangular Garden PROPORTIONS In this rectangular space no definite pro- portion between length and breadth is obli- gatory, but best results can usually be secured with a ratio of about 7 : 5 or 8 : 5. The most ineligible proportions are those which closely approach the square figure. Any ornamental figure, garden or bed-spread, ought to be distinctly square or distinctly rec- tangular. There is a favorite story in the west- ern mountain country that the sheepherder went crazy because he could not decide which was the long way of his bed-sheet (the sheet being square) . The story is plausible enough, for any rational mind wants to know clearly what sort of a figure it is viewing. The square garden (see Chapter IV) should be one thing, and the rectangular garden should be totally different. These two forms are structurally and radically diverse; and in designing a garden on the rectangular for- mula a first desideratum is to make its char- acter perfectly clear. A figure which might just as easily be a square as a rectangle is no more satisfactory than a fish which may turn out to be either a star-fish or a mackerel. On the other hand relatively long areas may The Rectangular Garden 31 sometimes be managed with full success. Thus a long, narrow strip of land connecting two major units may be made into an attrac- tive mall ; and the treatment of any such prob- lem will fall quite closely within the terms of the formula here outlined for the rectangular garden. SURFACE The area given to a formal garden should be level. At least it ought to be plane and approximately level, though a moderate slope may not be a serious detriment, especially if the slope be parallel with either axis. Formal gardens have sometimes been suc- cessfully built upon steeply sloping land. In practically all such cases the land has been terraced, often with the interposition of retain- ing walls, to several levels. It is hardly neces- sary to remark that such garden construction is expensive, and that unless funds are suffi- ciently ample to carry out the details with some vigor the final result is highly unsatisfactory. MAJOR AXIS Each rectangularly formal garden must have as its chief structural feature a major 32 The Rectangular Garden axis. In the large majority of cases this will be developed on the median longitudinal line. In exceptional circumstances it may lie to one side of this middle line ; or in other exceptional circumstances it may be developed transverse- ly to the greater length of the garden. This major axis is the backbone of the gar- den. On its security the whole garden de- pends. The comparison of this major axis of the garden with the backbone of a vertebrate animal is something more than a convenient figure of speech. It is an analogy which goes as deep as human thinking. It should be clear, therefore, that this major axis must be strongly and agreeably designed, and nothing whatever in the development of the garden must be permitted to weaken it. The manner in which such an axis is prac- tically developed will appear more fully in following paragraphs. MINOR AXIS At right angles to the major axis a minor axis should be developed. In some cases two or three minor axes are permissible. In rare cases also the minor axis may be merely indi- cated or entirely suppressed. The Rectangular Garden 33 This minor axis should be in every way sub- ordinate to the major axis — in width, in length (usually) and especially in the importance of its termini. (See page 35.) In a garden hav- ing several minor axes, for example, a long mall with trifling cross-axes, their combined length should be less than the length of the major axis. AXIS DEVELOPMENT These axes, major and minor, are frequently treated as paths. This is the simplest and most obvious way of developing a formal garden; but it is by no means the only way, nor is it necessarily the best. The central axis line may be occupied by a water basin, or by a canal, or it may be an open panel of turf. We may perhaps say that the essential require- ment lies in having this axis line open. Plant- ings or buildings which obstruct the view along the axis line (major or minor) are wholly inadmissible. Indeed the axis, which, as we have said, must be the strongest structural member in the garden framework, is not developed by build- ing directly upon it, but by two other quite different means. The first of these is the con- 34 The Rectangular Garden Rectangular Gardens Differing in Details of Plan struction of adequate termini (page 35) and the second lies in the balancing of parts on either side of the axis. Thus the flower beds, seats, trees and other features are repeated as exactly as practicable on either side of the axis The Rectangular Garden 35 line producing a palpable symmetry. This bilateral symmetry must be perfectly appre- hensible to the eye, even at a glance ; and this obvious symmetry fixes the axial line, even though that axis remains, like the famous equator of the earth, "an imaginary line". TERMINI Each axis must be provided with suitable termini. These termini must be objects of definite interest and beauty. The features most commonly employed are fountains, bird baths, sundials, gazing globes, seats, arbors, ornamental gateways, pergolas (of doubtful suitability), statues, tea houses, and small buildings generally. A single specimen tree or fine shrub may be used for minor axes in very small gardens. A broad outlook over several miles of beautiful scenery does not ter- minate any axis ; and it is never permissible to allow any axis to disappear into an exterior view. With reference to this last inhibition it should properly be confessed that this is the author's firm conviction, but that the rule has been frequently violated. While these viola- tions stand upon high authority in some cases. 36 The Rectangular Garden the author still feels that the rule as given is not only safest and best, but that in practically every case better results can be achieved under its guidance. The problem of treating exterior views will be referred to again. (Page 133.) These termini must appear at the ends of the axes, and nowhere else. It is false design to have two or three objects of special interest strung along any axis. It gives the same psy- chological revulsion experienced when the preacher ends his sermon and then begins again to conclude in two or three other efforts. Thus a garden axis, like an after dinner speech, ought to terminate once for all, and that should be the end of it. These terminal features must be carefully proportioned in size and interest to the length and importance of the axes on which they are placed. Features on the major axis must be distinctly larger and more interesting than those on the minor axis. In case several minor axes are developed their termini must be plain and inconspicuous; nevertheless definite ter- minal features must be provided. About the least that can be done is to place a chair, a vase or a specimen formal tree at the end of these most inconspicuous axes; for though these The Rectangular Garden 37 members may be never so mild and gentle they must still be visibly present each in its proper place. INTERIOR VIEWS While the smallness and snugness of the formal garden exclude the possibility of any grand views, still there should be innumerable good pictures. Many of these ought to be beautiful, even exquisite; for the possibility of such intimate interior pictures is one of the greatest of all reasons for making a formal garden in the first place. It might be expected, from the importance already attached to the garden axes, that the axial pictures will stand above all others. But in a good garden this is not so clearly the re- sult as one might expect. The quartering and unsymmetrical views of this symmetrical struc- ture should be almost or quite as good as the fully balanced pictures upon the middle line. One may easily test this same principle in architecture. There are millions of purely symmetrical buildings in the country, from the replica of the Parthenon at Nashville to the railroad station at Washington, yet how sel- dom does a good photographer make his pic- 38 The Rectangular Garden ture of one of these buildings straight head- on? Really, hardly ever. Nor do we, stop- ping to admire such buildings, prefer the axial view. Rather do we choose to look at them from an angle. Yet, while it is of capital importance to elaborate the formal garden in such a way as to make it yield an unlimited number of inti- mate beautiful photographable pictures, the space must not appear crowded nor cluttered. In particular should we avoid cutting up the small interior so as to lose the longest cross- views of the best features — features which, if properly placed, will occupy the margins of the garden. Fountains, arbors, belvederes, etc. should not be built within the garden so as to obstruct the general view. Under no circumstances should anything be built upon any axis intermediate between the termini in such a manner as to interrupt the axis line. The intersections of axes may sometimes be marked by pools of flat water (not playing fountains). Pools in this position are attrac- tive on account of the reflections they offer to- ward the principal points of view. M O ps; 1 ■%1 C3 a<* .2 fc. M The Rectangular Garden 39 OPEN SPACES Even in the smallest garden there should be some free open space, usually carpeted with turf, but in special cases paved with tile or bound with gravel or given to flat water. Flower beds are often introduced freely, some- times profusely into formal gardens. As a general rule, subject to possible exceptions, these will prove most satisfactory if disposed along the margins. Placing them in the cen- ters of the quadrants can rarely, if ever, be justified as good design. ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS Details of architecture and sculpture must of course be kept consistent throughout the garden. Simple and classical forms are usu- ally to be preferred. The architectural style most approved by modern taste is undoubtedly that of the later Italian renaissance. There is visible here and there a tendency to use so- called ''rustic" construction, but this can hard- ly meet the approval of the best taste. One might imagine using a cigar-store wooden In- dian or a Hopi hogan in a formal design, but their inappropriateness is so manifest as hardly to require a word. 40 The Rectangular Garden However it must be emphasized, in view of what actually happens, that some experience, a lot of common sense and a little uncommon good taste are needed to insure quite the best selection of architectural features and furnish- ings for any garden. Much depends further on bringing all these features and furnishings into scale. A pergola may be so big and coarse as to overpov/er a whole garden ; or a bird bath may be so small and dinky as to be lost amongst the roses. In this very important matter of keeping all the elements of the design in scale — that is in suit- able proportion to one another — nothing will serve except good taste refined by experience. No rules will be of real use. COLOR EFFECTS The temptation to do color patterns in the formal garden is almost irresistible. While it is important always to observe the ordinary rules of color harmony — not to plant pink mallows with red zinnias and not to have any Anthony Waterer spirea anywhere, — still it may well be doubted whether the refinements of color scheming so well known to interior decorators have any real place in landscape architecture. Ill THE DOMESTIC FORMULA VERY formula is subject to modifi- cation in its application to an actual problem. When a particular piece of land is to be developed, for example to make a home, the high desideratum is not to illus- trate a formula but to satisfy certain practical needs. Thus it transpires that a perfectly cor- rect design is seldom achieved, whether in radial formality, rectangular symmetry or in the so-called and well-beloved "natural style". Such departures from formula, however, raise a nice question. If they are wisely made to meet quite definite needs which could not be satisfied under the rules then the sense of fitness will amply justify them. But if, on the contrary, the logic of the ideal plan is broken to please a personal whim, it is plain that the first result has been damaged. Special wisdom is necessary when it comes to the application of styles or formulas to the design of home grounds. The effort to meet the practical requirements of this almost uni- versal problem while at the same time cling- 41 42 The Domestic Formula ing to a pet theory of "the natural style" or to some equally arbitrary theory of "formal gar- dening" has done much to discredit the whole doctrine of landscape architecture, especially in America. If we will clear our minds of prejudices, however, and approach this fasci- nating problem from the standpoint of simple necessities we may find that, somewhere along the way, there will be a favorable opportunity for the application of any rational formulas which we have fairly tested and understood. EXISTING CONDITIONS The infinitely multiplied problem of mak- ing a home out of a house and a bit of ground presents certain controlling conditions which are so nearly universal that they may be safely generalized. First to be considered is the tract of land itself. This is limited in extent. Even if a billionaire owns "all outdoors" he will select one spot in which to build his mansion and will set apart a relatively small tract to be de- veloped with the house. But in 999 out of 1,000 cases the home is built upon a small lot. This is a city lot 40 x 80 feet, or a village lot 60 X 200 feet, or a suburban tract of two or Garden Paxel; See Plan on Reverse of This Plate Indicating the Lack of Stiffness in Good Formal Design Below: Spanish Style in California CHA2.L&5 Rpe.'ri:ch Smitm Garden Plan on the "Domestic Formula." By Mr. Daniel Chester French The Domestic Formula 43 three acres. In a very large majority of cases the area will be a simple rectangle. When not strictly rectangular it will at least be bounded by straight lines and will be readily reducible to two or three connected rectangles. Then there is the house — the principal figure to be placed on this land. It, too, will be rectangular in plan, or a combination of simple rectangles. Practically without excep- tion it will be placed with its principal lines parallel with the principal boundary lines of the lot. If other items are to be added, such as a garage, a chicken house, a tennis court, these likewise appear upon the plan as rectangles. All these steps come by necessity. What we find, therefore, at the moment when we begin our landscape gardening, is a large rectangle (the land) broken up by a series of smaller superimposed rectangles. The inevitable re- sult is that we have presented for our develop- ment a series of small, more or less connected, rectangles. These have a variety of form and aspect, perhaps show differences in soil, and are to be kept for a variety of uses. Our prob- lem has now shifted from the idea of develop- ing one relatively large unbroken tract to the 44 The Domestic Formula more difficult necessity of developing several diverse little tracts and of bringing them into substantial unity. SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO USE At the outset we come upon the well-estab- lished principle of subdividing domestic grounds according to use into three cate- gories, viz. (a) public grounds, (b) private grounds and (c) service areas. The front yard, next the street, will be published to all passers. The private garden, or gardens, will be hidden from public curiosity. The service yard, where the washing is hung out or the wood-pile piled, will also be an area to itself, separated from both the front yard and the pri- vate garden. This highly logical subdivision of land cor- responds to the classification of spaces within every well-planned dwelling house. The front yard corresponds to the front hall and recep- tion room; and the front hall opens onto the front yard. The family garden, or gardens, correspond to the sitting rooms, library and other private rooms within the house, and should connect directly with those rooms. The service yard is the analog of the kitchen and T h s Domestic Formula 45 the laundry and should obviously be connected with them. In meeting these three practical require- ments we have made obvious progress toward disposing advantageously of the miscellaneous rectangular patches turned over to us. The space between the front of the house and the street is the front yard; a small space at the poorest side of the house has become the serv- ice yard ; and the larger remainders, — we hope on the sunny and sightly sides of the house, — become the private grounds. When these three assignments are separated by hedges, walls or trellisses, as is plainly desirable, our rectangular subdivision of the property has been further emphasized. That larger portion which has been assigned to family use may now be further subdivided. There may be room for a tennis court, for a croquet court, for a flower garden, for a spe- cial rose garden, for a children's play court, or for such other special uses as the composi- tion and tastes of the family may suggest. ANOTHER FORMULA All these considerations bring us to a point where we may safely state a new formula 46 The Domestic Formula covering the design of typical home grounds. This formula, when once worked out and understood, will be found applicable, with suitable modifications, to other problems only paritially domestic, e. g., to hospital and school grounds. We may now state our formula rather succinctly as follows : 1. The grounds should be subdivided into several parcels, mainly of rectangular form. How this subdivision proceeds logically from necessity has already been explained. 2. Such subdivision will be based prima- rily on use. There will nearly always be (a) an entrance area or "front yard", (b) a service area, and (c) a private yard. The private grounds may be further subdivided, according to their size and the uses required, into such areas as childrens' playground, tennis court, croquet court, flower garden, rose garden, re- serve garden, bird garden, poultry yard.* etc., etc. 3. These several areas should not be uni- form in size, nor (except for their rectangular lines) in form. If they can be placed at differ- *The poultry yard may be assigned to the service area if preferred. The same might be said of the vegetable garden. The garage and auto- mobile turn will preferably fall to the service area. The Domestic Formula 47 ent levels the arrangement is usually advan- tageous. Thus it becomes a merit of this for- mula that it deals easily with unlevel terrain. 4. These several areas should be shut off from one another and from adjoining prop- erty more or less completely by walls, build- ings, trellises, hedges, trees or shrubbery plant- ings. Some of these division screens will plainly need to be more exclusive than others ; and both taste and ingenuity will be called upon to make them effective without being ob- trusive or otherwise objectionable. 5. Each separate area must be given some distinctive character derived either from its luse or the introduction of some definite motive. Thus one portion might be a wild garden in the natural style; one might be a very formal tea-terrace; one might be a garden theatre. In short these several units may be developed on quite different formulas. 6. Circulation must be provided through these several areas ; and the lines of circulation will usually serve to connect and unify these separate parts. Paths, steps, pergolas,* corri- * The pergola here comes to its proper use as a connecting passage- way between garden or building units rather than as a detached garcten feature. The latter method of using the pergola is often seen naively and unconvincingly used in American gardens. 48 The Domestic Formula dors used for connection, must be interesting without being obtrusive. 7. Relatively large areas of smooth turf are desirable. A few small spaces may be paved with tile, stone, brick or clay. 8. A few good shade trees are almost es- sential, but shade can easily be overdone. In some localities a windbreak will be a practical requirement, and this should become a part of the primary design. 9. Shrubs will be used mainly as founda- tion plantings about buildings or in making up the division screens between unit areas. They will seldom or never be placed as indi- vidual specimens or in detached beds. In the screen plantings they may be unpruned and informal or they may be sheared to straight hedges. 10. Every home place, unless of very re- stricted area, should also include one or more good showings of hardy flowers. Bright and cheerful flowers need not be confined to set flower gardens; neither should they be scat- tered aimlessly everywhere. 11. Every home garden should be amply furnished in some of its private compartments. Furnishings may include shelters, seats, tables, o Intimate Home Garden in Pasadena, Calif. Landscape Architect Mr. Paul Thiene, The Domestic Formula 49 sundials, bird baths, gazing globes, statuary, fountains, etc. 12. Water is very desirable in the home garden. It may be introduced in formal pools, playing fountains or in semiformal canals. In those rare instances where running water is available, or an exterior view upon some river, lake or the ocean, every effort should be given to realizing the full benefit of such ex- traordinary resources. Thus our problem works out very simply. Each step follows logically from the condi- tions given. We have met all the necessities. The service has been duly provided; there is a decent front yard conforming to the good American custom; and the larger portion of the grounds has been utilized for the privacy and delight of the family. This is the way the solution presents itself to most intelligent amateurs, and this is the way the home-grounds problem is actually handled by nearly all the professional land- scape architects. The result is wholly satis- factory, but it assuredly is not the "natural style" ; neither is it the ''formal style" as usually expounded. It might better be called the "do- mestic style", since this formula states the 50 The Domestic Formula Example of the Domestic Garden The Author's Grounds The Domestic Formula 51 method really followed in tens of thousands of cases. It is more properly a formal, rather than a natural, mode of design, since it is founded upon purely geometrical figures. Furthermore the interior treatment of our several rectangles is apt to be formalistic rather than naturalistic, for very obvious reasons. Might it not be a happy ending, therefore, to all controversy about the inherent desira- bility of formal or natural styles if we could all recognize the simple and significant fact that we have actually developed in America a domestic style of our own which fits our needs, expresses our best taste and is beholden to no- body? IV RADIAL DESIGN |NOTHER form of symmetry is found in those figures which radiate from a ll center, or in which decorative or structural units are repeated at regular inter- vals and at equal distances from the center. The circle is the type of all such figures; but any regular polygon may be treated in the same way. The square may of course be treated either as a rectangle, in accordance with the formula proposed in Chapter II, or as a radial pattern. In the latter case the prin- cipal decorative object would be placed at the center — a development radically different from that used when the square is treated as a rectangle. In most practical instances it will doubtless be more effective to develop the square radially, placing the principal figure in the center, rather than to treat it as a rectangle with the principal objects on the margin. Figures in radial pattern occur frequently in nature. The corollas of most garden flowers present such a figure. The star-fish is a nota- ble example in the animal world ; but there are 53 54 Radial Design whole orders of animals conforming to this pattern. Many minute organisms, such as diatoms, exhibit very regular and beautiful examples of radial structure. In inorganic nature many crystals — perhaps most — follow the same plan. A good example, and certainly one of the most beautiful, is found in the snow- flake. Thus wnen man comes to use radial figures in industrial or artistic design he is not invent- ing anything new — only making use of a type freely and largely offered to him by Mother Nature. How widely man has accepted this teaching will be seen at first glance. Buttons, table plates and saucers, harness ornaments, flower beds, some windows, light fixtures, many articles of furniture, and hundreds of other objects promptly come to notice as ex- amples. In landscape architecture, too, the radial figure has been adopted. If flower beds are too trifling to serve as examples there may be found a certain number of authoritative rose gardens. The famous rose garden in Eliza- beth Park, Hartford, Conn., is of radial de- sign. In fact the old English tradition, not uncopied in America, was to make the rose Circular Pattern Bedding on a Ciri' Boulevard, Houston, Tex. Model for a Circular Rose Garden Radial Design 55 garden in the form of a circle. Then there is the outdoor theatre which quite naturally takes the figure of the semi-circle and so comes in for radial development. It may be pointed out further that small en- closed courtyards are often treated in the same manner, a fountain or other principal figure marking the center. And it may be fairly sur- mised that this radial formula might be used advantageously in the solution of a consider- able number of problems. At any rate it will be worth while to consider how this form of symmetry, so well authenticated by nature and so freely used by man, may be applied to gar- den design. THE AREA TO BE DEVELOPED Any space to be developed as a formal gar- den upon the radial formula should be level. To be more precise it must be plane and ap- proximately level. No serious departures from this rule could be tolerated. Secondly the area should be small. It has already been argued in Chapter II that the rectangular formal garden must be compar- atively small, but the radial garden must be smaller still. Leaving room for some excep- ^6 Radial Design tions we may say that the radius should not be more than 50 feet. In most instances the space treated would be considerably smaller even than this. (A radius of 50 feet would describe iiiii.iyPiyipi I lliapiiptpil!!""^ Marble Fountain with Sculpture Water 163 very decorative for the borders of pools and fountains. Alisma plantago-aquatica. Water plantain, sometimes recommended, may be used in large pools, but is better for ponds. Aponogenton distachyus, Cape pond-weed, is highly recommended by Mr. Wm. Tricker for pool planting. Arundoy Reed. These are very popular, es- pecially the well-known A. donax, growing six to ten feet tall, which is rather too large for formal gardens, unless in quite large quarters. Butomus umbellatus, Flowering rush, is a hardy perennial aquatic of easy culture. Calla palustris. Water arum (not Calla lily), is a small perennial aquatic very well suited to use in formal pools. C alt ha palustris, The homely Marsh mari- gold, may be freely planted along formal canals and even at the margins of pools, espe- cially if rather lush plantings are intended. CareXy Sedge. Many of the sedges are use- ful in water gardening. The one chiefly used by florists and nurserymen is C, morrowi. Cyperus, Sedge. Very satisfactory for aquat- ic uses. C. papyrus, the papyrus of Egypt, growing four to six feet high, is often used. 1 64 Water as is C, alternifolius, the umbrella sedge. Sev- eral other species are in cultivation. Epilobium hirsutum, Hairy willow weed, is an old-time garden flower, now somewhat rare, but suitable for use along water margins ; grows two to four feet high, flowers showy. Filipendula ulmaria, European meadow- sweet, sometimes called an herbaceous spirea, is a delightful hardy plant well fitted to show its best at the edge of a formal pool or canal. Hemerocallisy The Day lilies, all show to good advantage when planted near pools, fountains or canals of water, and may be freely used for such plantings in formal gardens. The roots should be set high enough above the water level to get good drainage, and an abundance of rich soil is desirable. Hippurius vulgaris is mentioned in Bailey*S Cyclopedia as producing "an attractive effect with the simple shoots standing above the water in ponds". Irises of many kinds are used in connection with water gardening, though most species, including the Japanese iris, are more effect- ively cultivated on dry land. The best water plant in the genus for use in the United States is perhaps /. pseudo-acorus, with lusty foliage Water 1 65 and tender yellow flowers. But several of the more popular species, including Japanese, German, Spanish and Siberian iris, may be used along the margins of pools and fountains. They should be set up out of the water, how- ever, where the rhizomes will get good drain- age and sun. Kniphojia, the Torch lilies, or "Red-hot poker plants", are used in sunny gardens and in California are much affected for Spanish or ''mission" gardens amidst arid surroundings, yet several of them may be used freely along the margins of pools or canals in formal gar- dens, and for such plantings are quite desir- able. Lobelia cardinalis, Cardinal flower; a very wild native species, but not difficult to culti- vate except that it is not permanent and must be often renewed from seed. It is so striking in its autumn flowering that one might take considerable pains to grow a few plants be- side his garden pool, or more particularly be- side a flag-bordered canal. Lysmachia, Loosestrife. Several species suited to shores of ponds or running water and to some extent adaptable to the requirements of formal water pieces. i66 Water Ly thrum s all c aria, The Purple loosestrife, is a hardy and popular native plant (especially the var. roseum, which is much better) for planting by ponds and slow streams. It may also be used freely in formal gardens. Menyanthes trifoliata, Bogbean, is de- scribed by Bailey in the Cyclopedia as "a very interesting bog plant, growing often in shal- low water". It is a native of North America and grows a foot and a half high. N ymphaea, Water lily. These beautiful plants are well known, but not well enough. The hardy native species and varieties are everywhere admired. There are now offered by nurserymen dozens of beautiful hybrids, many of which are wholly practicable in culti- vation, others being available to good gar- deners who are willing to take necessary pains. The Pygmy water lily (TV. tetragonal may be particularly recommended for small pools and fountain basins. Phalaris arundinacea, Reed canary grass, is admired by many. The striped variety (var. picta) is too popular, being rather a freak. Polygonum. The polygonums are mostly quite effective for waterside planting; but on account of their rank growth and coarse foli- Water ity age are better for wild garden uses than for formal surroundings. Sagittaria, Arrowhead, several species, nearly all native to shallow ponds, hardy and quite ornamental, suitable for planting in pools. S. subulata is a small species desirable for small pools. S. natans is also to be recom- mended. Sc'irpus, the ancient Bulrush, perhaps the very kind where Moses had his nursery. Suitable for water gardens; several species and varieties in the horticultural trade, espe- cially varieties of S. lacustris, including the popular but gaudy and objectionable striped var. zehrina, Tritonia {Montbretia) in several species and horticultural varieties gives a delightful effect when planted along the margins of small pools. Typha lati folia. Cattail, a common marsh plant growing 4-6 ft. high but excellent for large pools. Vallota purpurea, Scarborough lily, often grown in pots for a porch ornament, may be much better employed in pots or tubs for the borders of pools or fountains and in formal gardening generally. i68 Water Veratrum, False hellebore, or Indian poke, grows naturally in swampy places and makes a good ornamental plant, but is not so well adapted to the requirements of formal garden- ing. Still some of the species may be used occasionally if wisely handled. Veronica longtfolia^ the Beach Speedwell, 2 ft. tall, is effective planted at the margins of pools or fountains. Other species of Ver- onica may also be used. XIII ROSES AND FLOWER BEDS HE queen of flowers" has a partic- ular claim upon the formal gar- den. Long association with Per- sian seraglios, with the gardens of ancient Greece and with the magnificent formal gar- dens of old Italy, with the set and sheltered gar- dens of Mother England, with the Georgian culture of colonial America and with all the poetry and tradition of our language lifts the rose quite out of the company of common flowers, however lovely, and teaches us to think of them in different terms and with a different background. With the background, in short, of the formal garden. So when a modern American author, inspired to the mak- ing of a good garden book, began to write of roses, she called her essay "Sun-Dials and Roses of Yesterday".* The sun-dial, of course, stands for the formal garden, thus giving us together the approved combination of roses and formal gardens with the tradition of the poetic past. ♦Earle, "Sun Dials and Roses of Yesterday," New York, 1902. 169 170 Roses and Flower Beds But this association is supported by more than poetry and tradition. Practical horti- culture tends to the same decision. For the roses, with the exception of well-known hardy species, do not take at all to the wild garden or the open border. They have to be grown in good set beds, well dug, with drainage under- neath and timely culture above. And because tea roses and hybrid teas, and all their kin and progeny, have to be planted in beds for these merely practical reasons the rose garden be- comes more or less of a formal feature from the start. Whether, therefore, we intend to indulge ourselves with a mere knot of roses — a wistful dozen plants, — or whether we begin to plant a whole acre to make a stunning show in the public park, we still look to the formal garden for our planting and to the principles of sym- metrical design for our ground plan. If one will look at the plans of existing rose gardens in America,* such as the famous one in Eliza- beth Park, Hartford, the one in Lyndale Park, Minneapolis, designed by Mr. Theodore Wirth, the one in the Missouri Botanical Gar- den, St. Louis, designed by Mr. John Noyes, * See the American Rose Annual for 1918, Harrisburg. ' , .; 3"': t m, : 'myM. O O Co*, Ltd., 1927* 191 p* ilLus* 24 cm* 151916 1 1 Q Ai A D fiit CZAi OA A WPTinKrk 9.7-1 ?:;>94