REESE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. Received t-^£2^2^^«x iSSJb Accessions No^L^.^6/^ Shelf No.— THE NATURALIST'S LIBRARY. SIR WILLIAM JARDINE, BART., F. B. S. E., F. L. S., ETC., ETC. VOL. XIV. ORNITHOLOGY. GALLINACEOUS BIRDS. BY THE EDITOR. /^ o,™ (( UNIVERSITY EDINBURGH: W. H. LIZARS, 3, ST. JAMES* SQUARE. LONDON : S. HIGHLEY, FLEET STREET ; T. NELSON, PATERNOSTER ROW. DUBLIN : W. CURRY, JUN. & CO. MANCHESTER : J. AINSWORTH, 93, PICCADILLY ; AND ALL BOOKSELLERS. -< BIOLOGY PRINTED BY W. H. LIZARS, EDINBURGH. CONTENTS. PAGE MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE 17 Natural History of Gallinaceous Birds . . . 113 The Turkey. Meleagris gallopavo. Plate I. Male. — Plate II. Female and Young 117 The Ocellated Turkey. Meleagris ocellata. Plate III 143 Genus PAVO 147 The Javanese Peacock. Pavo muticus. Plate IV 1 52 Genus POLYPLECTRON 155 Argus Polyplectron. Polyplectron bicalcaratum . . . . 156 The Crested Polyplectron. Polyplectron empkanum. Plate V. . . 159 The Thibetian Polyplectron. Polyplectron Tibetanus. Plate VI. . . 161 Long-tailed Polyplectron. Polyplectron chalcurum. Plate VII. . . 163 The Argus Pheasant, or Gigantic Argus. Argus giganteus. Plate VIII. . . . 165 CONTENTS. PAGE Genus CALLUS 170 Gigantic Cock. Callus giganteus 171 Bankiva Cock. Gallus bankiva. Vignette Title . . . 175 The Bronzed Cock. Gallus ceneus. Plate IX 183 The Fork-Tailed Cock. Gallus furcatus. Plate X 184 Sonnerat's Wild Cock. Gallus Sonneratii. Plate XT. Male.— XII. Female 186 Genus PHASIANUS 189 The Ring-Necked Pheasant. Pliasianus torquatus. Plate XIII. . . 189 Diard's Pheasant. Phasianus versicolor. Plate XIV. Male. — XV. Female 200 The Barred-Tailed Pheasant. Phasianus superlus. Plate XVI. ... 202 Soemmering's Pheasant. Phasianus Sosmmeringid. Plate XVII. . . 205 Phasianus Staceii 206 The Silver Pheasant. Phasianus nyctliemerus. Plate XVIII. . . 207 The Golden Pheasant. Phasianus pictus. Plate XVIII.* . . . 209 Lady Amherst's Pheasant. PJtasianus Amherstia 210 Genus EUPLOCOMUS . . . . . . 213 The Macartney Cock. Euplocomus ignitus. Plate XIX. Male. — XX. Female 214 CONTENTS. PAGE Pucras Pheasant. Euplocomus pucrasia. Plate XXI. . . 216 Genus LOPHOPHORUS 218 Impeyan Lophophorus. Lophopkorus Impeyanus. Plate XXII. Male. —XXIII. Female .... 219 Genus TRAGOPAN 221 The Nepaul or Horned Tragopan. Tragopan satyrus. Plate XXIV. . . 222 The Golden-Breasted Tragopan. Tragopan Hastingii. Plate XXV. Male. — XXVI. Female 224 Black-Headed Tragopan. Tragopan melanoceplialus. Plate XXVII. . 226 Genus NUMIDA 227 The Crested Guinea Fowl. Numida cristata. Plate XXVIII. . . 228 The Common Guinea Fowl. Numida meleagris, Plate XXIX. . . 229 POULTRY AND THE POULTRY YARD. Common or Barn-Door Fowl and Turkey . 233 Pea Fowl 246 Guinea Fowl 248 Domestic Water Fowl. Ducks 249 Geese . . 251 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE MEMOIR.OF-AEtSTOTLE. THERE are few names in the annals of antiquity, or in the wide circle of classic literature, more cele- brated than that of Aristotle. In an age which could boast of Demosthenes, Socrates, and Plato, and in a country distinguished beyond all others for the cultivation of knowledge, he bore away the palm of genius from every competitor ; and although there are many departments of science wherein his labours have been surpassed by those of modern philoso- phers, there are others in which his profound eru- dition, and his amazing intellectual exertions, remain hitherto unrivalled. His comprehensive mind em- braced every subject which then formed a part of scholastic study, or fell within the range of human contemplation. Accordingly, of all the ancient Greek writers, he is at once the most voluminous, diversified, and obscure. His works, like those of many other classic authors, have descended to us in a corrupted and mutilated shape ; and though now rather admired than read or understood, they still maintain the reputation of being an encyclopaedia of J8 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. all that is curious or valuable in science and philo- sophy as they existed in Greece, when Greece, for learning and arts, was the most illustrious country in the world. At an early period of its history, the wisdom of the East, including the dark traditions of Egypt and India, with their mythology, geometry, and astronomy, were imported by native travellers, whom the gratitude of their fellow-citizens dignified with the title of Sophi, or wise men, on account of their extraordinary pre-eminence in natural and mo- ral knowledge. For many centuries the vestal fires of this adopted literature continued to burn with in- creasing splendour in the schools of Athens, Corinth, and Megara, under a succession of able masters, most of whom were the founders of distinct sects, who adopted their name and opinions. At the time when Aristotle appeared, the prevailing sects were the Ionic, the Socratic, the Cyrenaic, the Megaric, the Academic, and the Peripatetic ; each of which had its partisans, and generally flourished or declin- ed according to the celebrity of its teachers. About a century before the reign of Alexander, speculative philosophy had assumed a new and more systematic form ; many of its fanciful theories had been exploded ; a more rational method of instruc- tion was introduced, by treating the different sub^ jects, whether in ethics, physics, or politics, under their proper subdivisions ; all of which were studied in the Grecian academies with a rivalry and enthu* unparalleled perhaps in the history of civilized MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 19 nations. This improved philosophy was carried to its highest perfection hy Aristotle, in whose writings the doctrines of his predecessors and the learning of his age, were summed up and embodied as it were in- to one entire library. Of his indefatigable industry and extensive information, his copious remains, even in their abridged state, afford ample and honourable testimony ; and as for his talents, it would be disre- spectful to mankind, as Dr Reid well remarks, not to allow an uncommon share to a man who govern- ed the opinions of the most enlightened part of the species, for nearly two thousand years. Among his contemporaries he was regarded as " .Nature's ^Se- cretary," the high priest of science, anxl the prince of philosophers. During the darker ages, his dogmas reigned in the universities of Christendom with un- disputed sway. His memory was worshipped with a veneration almost divine, insomuch that he has sometimes been placed by the side of tbe Apostle of Tarsus ; for our countryman Roger Bacon, in his Opus Majus, has said, that " he hath the same au- thority in philosophy, that St Paul hath in divinity." The age of superstitious reverence for categories and syllogisms has long passed away ; and the re- nowned Stagirite, like other writers, must be weigh- ed in the balance of his own merits, instead of be- ing measured by the standard of ignorant admiration. A line of demarcation can now easily and safely be drawn between those portions of his works that are still deserving of attention, and those which have 20 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. been superseded by the gradual advancement of the human mind in intellectual and physical knowledge. Before proceeding, however, to give an analysis of his writings, it will be proper to relate what has been recorded of his life and character. Several of his own countrymen discharged the friendly task due to his genius, by becoming his biographers ; but their memoirs, except a few fragments, have perish- ed in the general wreck of antiquity. Whatever 13 now known concerning this remarkable man, must be gleaned from the meagre and often contradictory notices to be found in the pages of Diogenes Laer- tius, Dionysius Halicarnassus, Hesychius the Mi- lesian, Suidas, Ammonius, and a few others of more doubtful authenticity. Modern writers have not thrown much additional light on the subject, and their efforts have accomplished little more than at- tempting to reconcile what is discordant, or rejecting what is improbable, in the statements of the ancients. Aristotle was born at Stagira, a city and sea-port of Macedonia, about the beginning of the 99th Olym- piad, and 384 years before the Christian era. The place of his birth, which derives its chief celebrity from being associated with his name, and which, but for this fortunate accident, might have been blotted from the geography of Europe, was situated on the Strymonic Gulf, and long numbered among the Greek cities of Thrace ; but in the reign of Phi- lip it belonged to Macedon, as the conquests of that monarch had extended the name of his country far MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 21 beyond the river Stryinon to the confines of Mount Rhodope. The town possessed a harbour with a small island, named Kapros ; and, like some of the neighbouring cities, enjoyed the precarious dignity of an independent government. In the Peloponne- sian war, it was the ally of Athens, and afterwards became subject to the commonwealth of Olynthus, which, in its turn, was attacked by Philip ; and, with all its dependencies, reduced by the arms or arts of that ambitious prince, in the first year of the 108th Olympiad. That the resistance of Stagira was obsti- nate, may be inferred from the severity of its pu- nishment, for the conqueror, as we learn from Plu- tarch, ordered it to be razed to the ground. The parentage of Aristotle was highly respectable. His father Nicomachus was descended in direct line from Machaon, whose skill in physic is celebrated by Homer, and who was son to ^Esculapius, the companion of the Argonauts, exalted after his death to a place among the gods as the tutelary deity of the healing art. Nicomachus followed the profes- sion of his father and his ancestors, and even im- proved that branch of hereditary knowledge, by writing six books on medicine, and one on natural philosophy. He was the physician and friend of Amyntas, King of Macedon, who held him in pecu- liar esteem. The circumstance of this medical pe- digree has led one writer, Tzetzes, to allege that Aris- totle was called an JEsculapian figuratively, and not by descent ; but there seems no reason to call in question the common account of his genealogy. His 22 JUEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. mother, whose name was Phsestis, some have traced to the same illustrious origin as her husband ; but whatever was her extraction, her acknowledged country was Euboea, or Chalcidica, her father, as Dionysius Halicarnassus asserts, being one of the colony which was sent from Chalcis to Stagira* It was the misfortune of Aristotle to lose his parents at a veiy early age, a fact that Dr Reid seems to have overlooked when he mentions his being brought up at the Court of Macedon, as among the " many uncommon advantages" which he enjoyed. At what precise period that event happened, or what pro- gress he had then made in his education, it is now impossible to ascertain ; but, as one of his modem oiographers has remarked, it is an agreeable, and not altogether an unwarranted, conjecture, that his father had inspired him with a taste for his own pro- fession, and especially with that ardent love for the study of Nature, which made him long be regarded as her best and chosen interpreter ; while from his mother he imbibed that attic elegance and purity which everywhere pervades his writings. His gra- titude and affection to her he displayed, by causing her picture to be drawn by Protogenes, an eminent painter of that time, which Pliny reckoned as among the choicest pieces of that master. The early loss of his parents was supplied and compensated by the kind attentions of Proxenus, a * It appears from Laertius, that Aristotle had two bro- thers, Arimnestus and Arimnestes, and a sister called Hero. MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 23 citizen of Atarna, in Mysia, who received the young philosopher into his family, and skilfully directed his education. These important services the grateful pupil afterwards requited. Statues were erected at his expense in honour of Proxenus and his wife ; their child Nicanor he adopted as his own son, ami by his will left him a handsome property. On the death of his benefactor, Aristotle remov- ed to Athens, being then in his seventeenth year. There is same difference of opinion as to his pursuits and mode of life at this period, and also as to the cause of his enrolling himself a student of the Aca- demy. Athenseus and ^Elian relate that, having wasted the inheritance left him by his father in pro- digality and luxury, he adopted a military life ; that, failing of success, he had recourse to the selling of drugs, in which capacity, it is alleged, he visited Athens, where he accidentally entered the school of Plato, and being charmed with his wisdom, determined to become a disciple of that renowned teacher. This account, however, considering the tender years of Aristotle, is altogether improbable ; nor does it accord with the circumstances of his his- tory, as narrated by authors of unimpeachable credit. Equally erroneous is the assertion, that he was for three years the scholar of Socrates, since the latter died at least eight years before the Stagirite was born. The story of his being led to study philosophy in obedience to the advice of the Pythian oracle, must be classed among th» fictions of a credulous age. 24 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLft. A sufficient reason for his resorting to the Academy, may be found in the celebrity of Plato, whose school at that time was the most famous in the world, and Jong continued to be the centre of attraction for all the learning and genius of Greece. The master was not slow to discover and appreciate the extraordinary talents of his pupil. He admired his acuteness of apprehension, and often applauded his unwearied ap- plication to study. In compliment to his superior abilities, he called him the " soul of his school ;" and when he happened to be absent, he used to com- plain that his lectures were addressed to a " deaf audience." His industry in perusing and copying manuscripts, was unexampled and almost incredible. From this circumstance he was called, by way of eminence, the " student," and his house was styled the " house of the great reader." As he advanced in years, his penetration was as remarkable in^can- vasaing opinions, as his diligence had been unrivalled in collecting them. His capacious mind, we are told, embraced the whole circle of science ; and not- withstanding his pertinacity in rejecting every prin- ciple or tenet which he could not on reflection ap- prove, his singular merits failed not to secure the love and admiration of his venerable instructor, with whom he continued to reside for twenty years, until their friendship was dissolved by the death of the latter* Such was his eagerness in the acquisition of knowledge, that he devoted to it the best part of his life, — alike careless of the honours and emoluments of a court, MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. which the rank and connexion of his famil have procured him in Macedon ; and indifferent To the high distinction which his splendid abilities might easily have attained, by establishing a sepa- rate school, and founding a new sect in philosophy. It has been alleged, indeed, that various circum- stances occurred to interrupt the harmonious inti- macy between him and his master. Some have af- firmed that he offended the gravity of Plato by his foppery in dress, and his excessive fondness for os- tentatious ornament. His mantle was gaudy ; he wore sandals of rich materials, and rings of great value on his fingers ; his head and chin were closely cropped, contrary to the rule or the fashion of the Academy, which required the hair and beard of its disciples to be worn of their natural length. These may appear trivial causes of virtuous indig* nation ; but when we reflect, that, in ancient times, the shagginess of the human countenance was not only an indispensable requisite, but the legal standard for ascertaining the depth of wisdom and learning, such a contempt for scholastic usages must have subjected the offender to the reproach and resent- ment of his contemporaries. This imputed love of finery, however, was only assumed, perhaps, to con- ceal the defects of his figure, as his stature was short, and his limbs disproportionably slender. Certain it is, that his anxiety to adorn his person abated no- thing of his assiduity in the embellishment of his mind. His attention to dress (probably much exag- 26 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. gerated by his enemies) was in him merely an ac- cessory which neither altered his character, nor weakened that ardent desire for knowledge, which, even in the vigour of manhood, and amidst the gaieties of Athens, continued to he the master pas- sion of his soul. There are other reasons of discord stated by Laertius, who says, that Plato disliked the scornful derision of his looks, and could not endure his impertinent contradiction of his prelections ; on which account his friendship was withdrawn, and transferred to more submissive pupils. The repu- diated favourite, he adds, opened a school in the Lyceum, in opposition to his master ; at which the indignant sage severely remarked, that his ungrate- ful disciple resembled " the young foals that kicked their dams when they had sucked their fill;" and, from this circumstance, Aristotle was usually called the Colt. These charges, however, are generally ad- mitted to have been malicious aspersions cast upon his memory, and invented after his death. Their origin is ascribed to Aristoxenus, who took this me- thod of revenge, because Aristotle refused to make him successor in his school, having given the pre- ference to Theophrastus. That he contradicted Plato, and perplexed him with ingenious sophistries, is highly probable, considering the boldness with which lie determines questions beyond the reach of human intellect ; but, as Arnmonius observes, this is nothing wonderful, since Plato frequently contradicts himself. As for the assertion, that he was guilty oi MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 27 ingratitude to his instructor, by commencing to teach in opposition to him, it is altogether unfounded. Nothing is more unlikely than that he would have ventured on such a perilous step, at a time when the power of Chahrias and Timotheus, Plato's kinsmen, was almost absolute at Athens. We have the evi- dence of his own epistle to Philip, that he was a constant and sedulous hearer of this great philoso- pher as long as he lived. In his writings he makes honourable mention of him ; and, after his death, he erected, in testimony of his unchanged affection, an altar bearing an inscription which may be thus trans- lated : " This sacred shrine to Plato's name is rear'd, Which grateful Aristotle long rever'd! Far hence, ye vulgar ! nor presume to stain With impious praise, this consecrated fane." Olympiodorus mentions, that he composed a whole discourse in his commendation ; and, in his Elegies to Eudemus, he extols him in language as affection- ate as it is complimentary. " And, coming to the famed Cecropian town, In sign of friendship did an altar raise To him whom none with lips profane dare praise ; Who erring man to virtue did restore, Much by his precepts, by example more. A sage so pious, loved of gods and men, No future age must hope to see again." These and other affectionate tokens of regard to the memory of his master, afford a presumption, amounting almost to certainty, that there is no truth 26 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE, in the assertion that he gave offence to Plato by his effeminate dress and impertinent loquacity, or that he drove him from the Academy in his old age, and took possession of his chair, until he was himself expelled by Xenocrates. Plato died in the first year of the 108th Olympiad, and 338 before the Christian era, at the age of 81. Whether the venerable philosopher cherished a reci- procal esteem for his illustrious pupil, is doubted by some, who have alleged that he was jealous of his rising talents, and afraid lest his own celebrity should be eclipsed by that of a rival. In corroboration of this supposition, it has been observed that he no- where mentions him in his writings; and that, at his death, he did not appoint him his successor in the Academy, although confessedly the most distinguish- ed of all his scholars in learning and talents, but no- minated Speusippus to that situation, — a man far his inferior in abilities, temper, and moral character. It does not appear, however, that these allegations are better founded than the charges of his avowed detractors, already referred to. Speusippus was the nephew of Plato, being the son of his sister Po- tona ; his preference to Aristotle was therefore na- tural ; nor is there the slightest evidence that the Stagirite took offence that, in this appointment, the strong claim of merit should have been sacrificed to the partial feelings of consanguinity. On the con- trary, the altars and verses consecrated to his memory, evince that his attachment to his teacher had suffer- MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 29 ed no diminution ; and in some of his latest writings, he speaks of him with a degree of admiration ap- proaching to reverence. The demise of his master gave Aristotle an op- portunity of founding a separate school, but why lie neglected to avail himself of it, or why he chose to abandon the scene of his studies, can only be mat- ter of conjecture. Perhaps the connections which he had formed with some of the most eminent, as well as the most extraordinary, personages of his own or any age, might have inspired him with the design of leaving Athens, after he had lost the phi' losopher and friend whose reputation had first drawn him thither, and whose instructive society had so long retained him in that celebrated capital. Among his condisciples at the Academy, was a eunuch named Hermias, with whom he maintained a close and uninterrupted correspondence, and whose history forcibly illustrates the capricious vicissitudes of fortune. He was originally the slave of Eubulus, a prince and philosopher of Bithynia ; but his spirit was unbroken by servitude, and he possessed a mind far above the humble condition of his birth. Through the bounty of his indulgent patron, he was enabled early to gratify his natural taste for learning, by re- sorting to Athens, where he formed an acquaintance with the young Stagirite, which soon united them in the bonds of mutual esteem, and finally settled down into a cordial and unalterable friendship. But the calm retreats of science were abandoned for the 80 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE* more dangerous pursuits of ambition. His enter- prising courage, seconded by good fortune, raised him to the sovereignty of two Greek cities of Mysia, Assus and Atarna, the former lying in the district of Troas, the latter in that of ^Eolis; and both of them, like most Grecian colonies on the Asiatic coast, but loosely dependent on the Persian empire. His suc- cessful boldness in usurping the sceptre, was only equalled by the manly firmness with which he held it ; and as the armies of Artaxerxes were distant, he found little difficulty in maintaining peaceful posses- sion of it for a time. It was upon the invitation of his now royal friend and companion, that Aristotle, immediately after the death of Plato, repaired to Atarna ; and his resolu- tion was probably influenced by the fond desire of revisiting the spot where he had spent the happy years of his youth, under the kind protection of Proxenus. In that city he found the wish of Plato realized ; he beheld in his friend Hermias philoso- phy seated on a throne. With him he resided near- ly three years, receiving the warmest testimonies of love and respect, and enjoying the inexpressible pleasure of seeing his own enlightened political maxims exemplified in the virtuous reign of his fel- low-student. But the seat of the usurper is gene- rally insecure, and so it proved with Hermias. Ar- taxerxes having subdued the rebels in Egypt, deter- mined to restore to his dominion the dismembered cities of Mysia, Mentor, a General whose zeal and MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 31 valour are recorded in the Persian annals, was em- ployed as the fittest instrument for accomplishing the task. This apostate and unprincipled Greek was numbered among the friends of Hermias^ and con- nected with him by the sacred ties of hospitality ; but the breast of a renegade and traitor is alike in- sensible to the feelings of honour and the obligations of gratitude. His former intimacy was made the means of facili tating the cruel stratagem. The unwary prince was decoyed to an interview, where he was seized by Mentor in person, and sent privately to Upper Asia, until an order arrived from Artaxerxes for his execution. The base artifices of the betrayer ended not with this atrocity. Having possessed himself of the ring which Hermias usually employed as his signet, he sealed with it despatches to the dif- ferent cities that acknowledged his authority ; and by this false key their gates were opened without suspicion to the Persian soldiers. The perfidy of Mentor, which thus insidiously compassed the ruin and death of his friend, Aristotle has himself branded with deserved infamy, when, in one of his treatises, he contrasts the dexterity of this successful knave with the real virtue of prudence. His gratitude to this generous benefactor he celebrated in verse, by writing a hymn to his praise, and erecting a statue to his memory, in the Temple at Delphi, which bore an inscription, in allusion to the disreputable means by which he was cut off. 82 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. This man by hands dishonourable slain, The faithless Persian king his victim made ; Not as the hero falls on battle plain, But under friendship's hollow mask betrayed. There were certain detractors who attempted to give his virtuous friendship for Hermias the colouring of a criminal attachment ; but their reports obtained little credit at the time, and are now discarded as notorious calumnies. Theocritus of Chios, a Greek historian who wrote an account of Libya, carried Ins obloquy so far, as to satirise both his moral character, and his public testimonial to Hermias, in a severe epigram, thus rendered : An empty shrine to Eubulus's slave The amorous eunuch — Aristotle gave, Himself as empty ; who, from brute desire, Forsook the school for pleasure's filthy mire. These scandalous imputations were answered by Apellicon, a philosopher of Teios, who wrote several books on purpose, wherein he elaborately confutes those who dared, in this manner (as he expresses it) " to blaspheme the name of so great a man." The moderate policy which Mentor, in his first transactions at Atarna, found it necessary to assume, enabled Aristotle to avoid the punishment which naturally overtook the ambition of his friend. By a timely flight he escaped to JVlitylene, in the island of Lesbos, in company with Pythias, the kinswoman and adopted daughter of Hermias, whom that prince MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 33 had educated, and destined to become the heiress of his fortunes. Her expectations were now miserably reduced ; but this Bad reverse endeared her the more to Aristotle, who espoused his fair companion, for whom he entertained a sincere attachment. He was then in his thirty-seventh year, which is pre- cisely the age recommended by himself as the fittest on the male side for entering into wedlock. The lady did not long survive her marriage, but she left an iufant daughter whom the father named after a wife tenderly beloved, and who repaid his affection with the most tender sensibility. It is mentioned by Diogenes Laertius, as her last request, that when her husband should die (which might the fates long avert ! ) her own ashes were to be disinterred, and enclosed with his in the same monument. Aristotle passed but a short time in the Island of Lesbos, his celebrity being now too well known to allow him much leisure for the indulgence either of love or melancholy. His father's name and his own were familiar at the court of Macedon ; and, during his residence in Athens, he had strengthened his hereditary friendship with Philip, a prince only one year younger than himself, who, having lived from the age of fifteen to twenty-two in Thebes, and the cities, had ascended the throne of his in the twenty-third year of his age. This circumstance of itself may account for the applica- tion which that monarch made to Aristotle, to im dertake the education of his son Alexander, who. 34 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. even from his boyhood, had given symptoms of thosd extraordinary talents which have made his actions as a conqueror so familiar to posterity. It has been al- leged, on the authority of Laertius, that, while a stu- dent at the Academy, he had been sent by the Athenians on an embassy to Philip, to implore his forbearance in behalf of the Grecian cities, which he then threatened to subject to the yoke of his military despotism ; and that, having succeeded in his mis- sion, his grateful fellow-citizens decreed his statue to be placed in the Acropolis, as a benefactor to the Republic. It is more than probable, however, that these statements have arisen from a slight anachronism, and that the Athenians had used his influence with Philip to spare their freedom, not before but after he had become an inmate of his family. This cir- cumstance may have occasioned the erection of a statue to his memory, in remembrance of the services which he then rendered the State. It was in the fifth year of his father's reign that Alexander was born. Several tutors or preceptors had been employed in training his infant mind, at the head of whom was Leonidas, a kinsman of the queen. But Philip early perceived, that the educa- tion of his son was a matter of too great importance to be entrusted to ordinary masters. Music, dan- cing, and such-like accomplishments, he found to be unsuitable to his genius, which, as Sophocles has said, required ** The rudder's guidance, and the curb's restraint.** MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. dD Accordingly, he addressed himself to Aristotle, in a letter as flattering to his literary fame as was the compliment paid by Queen Elizabeth to Sir Isaac Newton. This epistle is recorded by Agellius in the following terms : " PHILIP to ARISTOTLE — Health. — Know that I have a son. I render the gods many thanks, not so much for his birth, as that he was born at the time when Aristotle lives ; for I am assured that, if edu- cated and instructed by you, he will become worthy* of us, and worthy of the kingdom which he inherits." In compliance with this kingly request, Aristotle set sail from Lesbos, and escaping the danger of the Athenian fleet, then at war with Macedon, he ar- rived at Pella, to undertake one of the few employ- ments not unworthy of a philosopher qualified to in- struct and benefit the latest ages of the world. In the tuition of his illustrious pupil, he spent about eight years, during which long period, in an office replete with difficulty and delicacy, he had the rare honour of giving the highest satisfaction to the royal parents, while he excited in the breast of their son feelings of the warmest gratitude. He was treated, both by Philip and his proud queen Olympias, with every mark of distinction that greatness could bestow on acknowledged merit. He was admitted to an ex- tensive share in the government, and allowed a voice in the counsels of his sovereign, where his advice was often useful, and always acceptable. On these occasions he was not slack to exert his kind inter* 36 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. cessions in Behalf of his friends and countrymen whenever his interest could be of service. The misfor- tunes, which, in the progress of Macedonian con- quest, had befallen his native city Stagira, gave him an opportunity of shewing the strength of his attachment to the place of his birth. Although he had not resided there, and appears scarcely to have visited it for the long period of thirty years, yet, through his representations at the Court of Pella, the town was entirely rebuilt, its walls and ornamental edi6ces were restored, and its wandering citizens collected and reinstated in their former possessions. He himself supplied them with a code of wise laws for the regulation of their government ; nor were the inhabitants on their part ungrateful for the generosity of their sovereign, and the patriotism of their fellow townsman. To commemorate the event, they insti- tuted annual festivals called Aristotelaea, and gave the name of Stagirites to the month in which they were celebrated. Authors have recorded other examples of his exertions, in having, amidst the devastations of war, extended the patronage and secured the protec- tion of science. We learn from Plutarch, that Philip, in testimony of the satisfactory manner in which he fulfilled his engagements as preceptor to his son, as- signed him a school and a study, called the Nym- phaeum, at the neighbouring town of Mieza, where, .ong after his death, the shady walks and stone benches were pointed out still bearing his name. The same biographer mentions that Alexander, in reverence for MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 37 the sentiments with which his master had inspired him, spared the house of Pindar in the sack of Thebes ; and that, in his expedition against the Per- sians, the town of Eressus in Lesbos was exempted from the fate of other conquered cities, because it was the birth-place of Theophrastus and Phasias, two of Aristotle's disciples. Alexander was in his sixteenth year when he was placed under the tuition of the Stagirite, the most in- teresting period of life for moulding and confirming the future character of the man. In training such a youth, he had a rich field to cultivate, although the precocity of his intellect had in some degree out- stript the unripeness of his years, and thus made it difficult for an instructor, however skilful, to alter or eradicate impressions which had almost settled down into fixed principles. The ambition of Alexander had early taken root, and the peculiarities of his ge- nius had already manifested themselves in certain public and very important transactions at his father's court. When his lofty notions of conquest and his premature love of aggrandisement are taken into ac- count, it may well be supposed that these juvenile passions would sometimes prove too headstrong to be governed or restrained by the voice of reason, speaking even from the mouth of an admired philo- sopher. Although many shared in the love and esteem of the youthful prince, Aristotle is the only one of his friends whose superior genius he appear* unceasingly to have viewed with undiminished ad- 38 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. miration, and whom he seems to have treated through life with uniform and unchanged respect. The branches of knowledge to which his attention was first directed, were poetry, ethics, and politics. Science and philosophy were not the only studies in which Aristotle excelled; he was addicted to the muses, and while he favoured the world with criti- cisms on the works of others, he was himself the au- thor of productions that ranked him a poet of the first eminence. Few of his verses, indeed, have reached modern times, but the few that remain prove him worthy of sounding the lyre of Pindar ; and it is not the least singularity attending this extraordi- nary man, that with the nicest and most subtle powers of discrimination and analysis, he united a vigorous and rich vein of poetic fancy. In his writings he frequently cites the bards of Greece, especially Homer. This taste he imparted to his pupil, for whose use he prepared a correct edition of the Iliad, which obtained the name of the casket copy, from the circumstance of its being enclosed in a rich cas- ket, found after the siege of Gaza among the spoils of Darius, in which that unfortunate monarch is said to have kept his perfumed ointments. This edition he constantly carried about with him in his wars, re- garding it as " a portable treasure of military know- ledge," and every night it was laid with his dagger under his pillow. It is not improbable that the poe- tical prelections of his master, and his admiration for the verses of Homer, might tend to inflame that na- MEMOIR OP ARISTOTLE. 39 tural love of military glory which afterwards carried him over the finest regions of the East, and taught aim to weep for want of more worlds to conquer.* But the bard of Troy was not his only companion in these foreign expeditions. Plutarch says, that as he could find no books in the upper provinces of Asia, he wrote to Harpalus, and obtained most of the trage- dies of Euripides, Sophocles, and ^Eschylus, with the Dithyrambics of Telestus and Philoxenus. The same author alleges that Aristotle taught him the art of medicine, a study with which he was not only ex- ceedingly delighted in theory, but which he prac- tised with considerable success among his friends. That ethics and politics formed a prominent and most important ingredient in the education of the juvenile prince, is obvious from the writings which the Stagirite devoted to the subject. He addressed to his pupil, long after this period, a Treatise on Go- vernment, instructing him how to reign, and exhort- ing him to adjust the measure of his authority to the particular characters, habits, and modes of thinking, of the various classes of his subjects, according to a maxim which he frequently inculcated, that different nations require different modes of administration. In his treatise on politics, he has carefully delineated the plan of education best adapted to persons of the * Plutarch says, that as soon as Alexander landed in Asia, he visited Ilium, and offered libations to the Trojan heroes. He anointed the pillar on the tomb of Achilles with oil, and ran round it naked, after which he put a crown upon it, exclaiming how happy that hero was in having a Hornet to record his praise* 40 iflEMOIR OP ARISTOTLE. highest rank in society ; and this plan we may sup- pose he put in operation in performing the task as- signed him by Philip ; modified no doubt according to the character and circumstances of the extraordi- nary youth for whose instruction it was prepared. According to the principles laid down in that book, the two years immediately following puberty consti- tute that important era which is especially adapted for improving and strengthening the bodily frame, and for acquiring that corporeal vigour which is one main- spring of mental energy. During this interest- ing period, with the proper management of which the future happiness of the whole life is so connected. Aristotle observes, that the intellectual powers ought indeed to be kept in play, but not too strenuously exercised, since powerful exertions of the mind and body cannot be made at once, nor the habits of making them be simultaneously acquired. Agreeably to this principle, Alexander was encouraged to pro- ceed with alacrity in his exercises until he attained the highest possible degree of perfection in them ; after \fcjjich the whole bent of his mind was diverted to the acquisition of science and philosophy. The curiosity of the young Macedonian was too ar- dent, and his judgment too acute, to rest satisfied with the meagre and superficial doctrines which then com- prised the sum of popular instruction. The discern- ment of his preceptor easily perceived that his mind was capable of being trained to whatever is most subtle in distinction, and exalted by whatever is most lofty in speculation ; and that his faculties, by thus expanding MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 4 1 and invigorating amidst objects of the highest intel- lectual pursuits, might thereby learn the more readily and the more perfectly to comprehend ordinary mat- ters. This recondite philosophy, which Aristotle first delivered to his royal pupil, and afterwards to his hearers in the Lycaeum at Athens, received the epithet of Acroatic, to distinguish those parts of his lectures which were confined to a select audience, from such as were delivered to the public at large, and these were called Exoteric. This technical di- vision of the writings of the Stagirite, has given rise to a variety of different opinions and disputes. Some have imagined that in the two kinds of prelections just noticed, he maintained contrary doctrines on the sub- jects of religion and morality. But the fact is quite the reverse ; his practical tenets being uniformly the same in both. His Exoteric or popular Treatises, nearly resembled the philosophical dialogues of Plato or Cicero ; while his Acroatic writings, contained in a concise energetic style peculiar to himself, those deep and broad principles on which all science is built ; and, independently of which, the most perverse rea- sonings, and the most intricate combinations, are but matters of common mechanical practice.* The sublimity of this abstract and recondite philo- sophy, accorded exactly with the loftiness of Alexan- der's mind. Amidst the tumult and bustle of distant war, he considered it a source of pride to have made an acquisition which was then denied to the vulgar ; " Dr Gfllies's Analysis of Aristotle's Ethics and Politics* 42 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. and when these writings were given to the world, he remonstrated with his master for having given others an opportunity of becoming as learned as himself. A correspondence on this subject has been preserved by Plutarch, who records the following letter written soon after the battle of Guagamela or Arbela, and while the youthful hero was in full pursuit of Darius. " ALEXANDER to ARISTOTLE — Health — You have not done right in publishing your Acroatic dis- courses, for wherein shall we be distinguished above others, if the learning in which we have been instruct- ed be made common to all ? As for me, I would rather excel other men in knowledge than in power. — Farewell." la his reply, Aristotle rested his apology on the abstruse nature of the subjects, and the impossibility of comprehending them without the aid of verbal il- mstration. " ARISTOTLE to ALEXANDER — Health. — You wrote to me concerning my Acroatic works, that they ought not to have been communicated, but kept secret. Know then, that though published, they are not made public, since none can fully understand them, except those who have heard my lectures. — Farewell." From this it would appear that the Stagirite con- sidered these writings merely as text-books or out- lines of his course ; and we may infer that the true cause of secrecy was the nature of the speculative doctrines inculcated in them. That he had taught his pupil a purer theology than that of the age and MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 43 country in which he lived, may he assumed, from the fact, that, in the midst of his brilliant victories and unexampled conquests, he reminded him of the supe- riority of religious excellence to worldly greatness ; concluding an epistle to him with this memorable ad- monition, " that those who entertain just notions of the Deity, are better entitled to be high-minded than those who subdue kingdoms." Persecution for avow- ing opinions differing from those of the national creed, was not then uncommon in Greece ; and had the royal preceptor ventured to maintain the unity and perfection of God in plain and popular language, he must have exposed himself to the tragical fate that overtook Socrates. It has been asserted by authors even so recent as Brucker, that for sordid and selfish purposes Aristotle accommodated the tenets of his philosophy to the base morals of courts ; but his ethical writings which still remain, and which are the most practically useful of any that Pagan antiquity can boast, are an ample refutation of a calumny, which must be ranked as another " weak invention of the enemy." So sen- sible was Alexander of the benefits derived from his instructions, that he considered them more valuable than the advantages he inherited from his father, be- cause, as he used to remark, the one gave him life, but the other had taught him to live well. " I have not reigned to-day," is said to have been his ordinary reflection, if a single day had passed without his do- ing some worthy or benevolent action. Upon the 44 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. whole, it may be safely asserted, that if this extraor- dinary prince, with all his faults, was distinguished beyond others for the love of knowledge and virtue, he was mainly indebted for this superiority to the lessons of his teacher. The seeds of his haughtiness and ambition were planted before Aristotle was in- vited to take the direction of his education. The passion for war, — the infirmity of noble minds, — could neither be restrained nor moderated ; but to counter- act that overruling propensity, his breast was inspired with still more pure and exalted sentiments, which placed him as far above the other conquerors of an- tiquity, as they were themselves distinguished beyond the common herd of mankind. If his loftiness could not be subdued, it was made to combat as much as possible upon the side of virtue ; his excellencies, therefore, may fairly be ascribed to Aristotle, — his defects to nature, and the example of a court, — his misfortunes to himself, and the intoxicating effects of unbounded prosperity. At the age of twenty, Alexander succeeded to a kingdom torn in pieces by dangerous factions and implacable animosities. In a short time events cail- ed him to a distant scene of action ; and, after an affectionate intimacy of eight years, the pupil and the preceptor separated for ever, to pursue, in a ca- reer of almost equal duration, the most opposite paths to the same immortal renown: — the one by his victorious arms — the other by the gentle wea- pons of philosophy; — the one by gratifying the most MEMOIR OP ARISTOTLE. 45 immoderate lust of power — the other hy teaching to despise this and all similar gratifications. When the one set out on his eastern expedition, the triumphs of which terminated in the course of ten years hy his premature death, the other quitted the capital of Macedon, and returned to his beloved Athens, where he spent the remainder of his life (about thirteen years), instructing his disciples, and cultivating, with unabated diligence, the various branches of learning. It has been said that he ac- companied the conqueror in his Asiatic wars ; that he travelled with him over all Persia as far as the land of the Brahmins (India), where he wrote a work on the laws and institutions of two hundred and fifty-five cities ; but this journey is a pure fabri- cation, and we therefore dismiss it without further comment. One circumstance may here be mentioned, as it is the only one that seems to have occasioned any suspicion or dislike between them. On leaving Alexander, Aristotle, preferring a life of study and retirement, recommended, as a person worthy of ac- companying him in his Persian expedition, his own disciple and nephew Callisthenes, (son of Hero,) a learned man, but of a morose unaccommodating temper, unguarded in his speech, and obstinately attached to the old system of republicanism which Philip had overturned in Greece. His kinsman was aware of his faults, and having observed the unsea- sonable freedom with which he spoke to the king, he admonished him in a verse of Homer, " that his 46 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. unbridled tongue might shorten Ins days." The prophecy was literally fulfilled. Callisthenes, for- getting the advice of Arrian, that the attendant of a prince ought never to he wanting in due deference to his will, rudely and outrageously opposed Alex- ander's resolution of exacting the same marks of homage and prostration from the Greeks which were paid to him hy the Persians. It is also said he had joined a conspiracy against the life of his sovereign ; having taken great offence that Hermolaus, a noble youth who had studied philosophy under him, should have been severely punished with stripes, for having dared at a hunting-match to throw the first dart at a wild boar in the royal presence. The conspira- tors, it is added, were all stoned to death ; the plot being discovered by one of their own number. The punishment and fate of Callisthenes, whether his treachery was real or imaginary, is related more variously than almost any historical event of such pub* lie notoriety ; some asserting that he perished in a dungeon, after being mutilated of his ears, nose, and limbs ; and others that he was carried about in an iron cage, a miserable spectacle, covered with filth and vermin, and at last devoured by a hungry lion* Whatever might have been the manner of his death, most writers concur in opinion, that he met with the just reward of his rashness and arrogance. This transaction is alleged to have much estranged the affections of Alexander from his favourite preceptor The assertion, however, is not accompanied with MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 4? any solid proof; and the absurd calumny that he not only regarded this pretended displeasure as an in« jury, but even proceeded the length of joining in a conspiracy to poison the king, is warranted by no« thing in history, except a report preserved in Plu* larch, of a vague and hasty expression in a letter of Alexander to Antipater, " I will punish the sophist (Callisthenes) and those who sent him." The friend- ly epistles addressed by him while in Asia to hit former instructor, contradict the supposition of any irritation or enmity between them. Leaving the " Macedonian madman" to pursue his conquests in the east, we must now return to the personal history of the Stagirite. On arriving at Athens, he found Xenocrates teaching in the school of Plato, his predecessor Speusippus having been dead four years. The character of Xenocra* tes was that of dull gravity and rigid austerity. He had been a fellow-student with Aristotle at the Aca- demy, where the striking contrast of their genius did not escape the notice of Plato, who used to ex- claim, " What a horse arid an ass have I to yoke to- gether ; Xenocrates requires the spur, Aristotle the curb;'* alluding to the obtuseness of the one and the acuteness of the other. The circumstance of such a man having been exalted to the supreme chair of philosophy, is said to have determined the Stagirite to open a school on his own account ; re- marking, " that it would be disgraceful for him to be silent while Xenocrates publicly taught." Thia 48 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. observation some have thought to savour too much of arrogance and self-conceit to have been made by Aristotle ; but whether it was ever uttered or not, his success soon demonstrated that he had not rated Ms scholastic talents too high. The Academy be- ing in the possession of his friend, he made choice of the Lycaeum, a place which Pericles had prepared for the exercising of his soldiers, and which lay in the immediate suburbs of Athens, on the banks of the Ilissus. It was well shaded with trees, and adorned with a temple of the Lycian Apollo. Here he established a gymnasium, where he taught philo- sophy to such as had an inclination to hear his dis- courses. It was his custom to teach walking con- stantly every day along the shady avenue (or Peri" paton) of the temple, until the hour of anointing, which the Greeks generally performed before meals ; and from this habit his scholars and his philosophy derived the name of Peripatetic. His Acroatic lec- tures were given in the morning to those who were his regular pupils. A considerable part of them is still preserved in his works, which form an abstract or syllabus of treatises on the most important branches of speculative science. His Exoteric discourses were held tfter supper (always an early meal with the ancients), at which occasional visitors were admit- ted. They constituted the amusement of his even- ing walks ; for he thought exercise peculiarly useful after eating, for animating and invigorating the na- tural heat and strength, which the too rapid succes- MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 49 sion of sleep and food seemed fitted to relax and impede. By degrees the number of his auditors increased so much, that he was obliged to desist from walk- ing, and deliver his prelections sitting. The cele- brity of the teacher speedily conferred a renown on the Lycseum, which eclipsed that of its rival, and which has made the very name famous to all poste- rity. Among his friends and disciples at this time were numbered some of the most eminent men of letters and philosophy in Greece. Not to mention Antipater, the governor of Macedon, and successor of Alexander, to whom he gave instructions ^ his school could boast of Theophrastus, who wrote the History of Plants, and a vast number of other works — of Phanias, a celebrated logician — of Eudemus of Rhodes, known for his analytical and geometrical writings — of Eudemus of Cyprus, whom Aristotle honoured so highly as to call his " Dialogue of the Soul" after his name — of Dicaearchus, an orator and geometrician, whom Plutarch ranks among the best of philosophers — of Aristoxenus, whose ingratitude has already been mentioned, as the calumniator of his master — of Hipparchus of Stagira — Leon the sophist — JEschiron, a heroic poet of Mitylene — Hieronimus the Rhodian — Heraclides of Pontus, a noted philologist — all of whom, with many others, are acknowledged to have studied in the Lycaeurn, where She attendance was so numerous and distinguished, that Nicander of Alexandria, wrote a book expressly 50 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. upon the subject. Had this work survived, the ca* talogue would have been more perfect, but urifortu* nately it is no longer extant. Like other great men, Aristotle had enemies and detractors, as well as admirers. Of their calumni- ous charges, some were so absurd as to refute them- selves. They have been perpetuated in the sar- casms of Lucian, and the lying whispers of Athe- nseus, which, in more recent times, have been too often mistaken, even by the learned, for true his- tory. In Athens, the jealousy and envy which usually accompany superior talents, were inflamed by philosophical prejudices, and professional rivalry Sophists and sciolists, soothsayers and satirists, as- sailed the Stagirite, and vied with each other in heaping obloquy on a character, the ornament of his own age, and destined for many centuries to be the great instructor of mankind. So long as Alex- ander lived, whose name then filled the whole civi- lized world, his preceptor was unmolested, even amidst the turbulence of the Athenian democracy ; and it was not till the year following the death of that prince, that the rancorous malignity which had been suppressed burst forth against Aristotle with resistless violence. That he regarded with equal contempt vain pretenders to real science, and real professors of sciences which he deemed vain and frivolous, is obvious from innumerable passages in his moral and political works. But it was on ac- count of his theological opinions, which, as we have stated al**ve- were too refineu for the grossness of MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 5J paganism, that he was cited before the tribunals of his country; — a mere pretext, to give a plausible disguise to the conspiracy formed against his life. Accordingly, he was accused of impiety before the Areopagus by the hierophant (or priest) Eurymedon, abetted by Demophilus, a man of more weight in the Republic ; both of them being instigated to this cruel persecution by the declared enemies of the ac- cused. The heads of the accusation were — that he had introduced certain philosophical tenets, contrary to the religion of the Athenians ; that he had ho- noured the memory of his wife Pythias and hii friend Hermias with hymns and statues — ceremonies which belonged solely to the majesty of the gods. As the inscription on the altar and the ode in praise of Hermias have both been preserved, nothing more is required to shew the utter groundlessness of the accusation ; and from the frivolous nature of this charge, which was considered the chief article in the impeachment, we may warrantably conjecture, that the reproach of worshipping Pythias with honours due to the Eleusinian Ceres, was equally unfound- ed. A more reasonable and a more natural infe- rence might have been, that the virtues of the wife had inspired the husband with more than a common degree of attachment ; and that, after her death, he had expressed his affectionate regard with an amiable enthusiasm, which the malice of his enemies con- strued into an act of criminal idolatry. As for the alleged impiety of his philosophical tenets, his denial 52 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. of a Providence, and the consequent inutility of prayers and sacrifices, these imputations are not only not corroborated in any of his writings, but clearly and uniformly contradicted. He enumerates the priesthood as among the functions or offices essen- tially requisite to the existence of every community; and he has shown his veneration for religion in ge- neral, by treating with tenderness even that distort- ed image of it reflected in the puerile superstitions uf his country. Truth, however, is always dreaded by the interested supporters of popular errors ; and the Athenian priests had more to apprehend from his enlightened theology than to fear from his pre- tended impiety. Aristotle was not unprepared for this persecution, and, had his cause been tried before an impartial tribunal, defeat and disgrace must have recoiled up- on his accusers. He is said to have composed an oration in his own defence, and to have inveighed in a strong metaphor against the increasing degene- racy of his fellow-citizens, by citing a verse from the Odyssey, Pear withers after pear, And fig on fig rots here, alluding to the swarms of informers (or sycophants) and false accusers, which sprung up daily in Athens, in as regular succession as the fruits in the rich gar- dens of Alcinous. This discourse, the boldness of which could only have inflamed the blind zeal of hia MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLfc. 53 weak or wicked judges, was not delivered in Court. Perceiving that his fate was inevitable, the phi- losopher stole privately away from the city, thus escaping the idle mockery of a trial ; and being un- willing, as he expresses it, that the Athenians should have a second opportunity of committing a capital crime against philosophy — alluding to the death of Socrates, who had fallen a victim to the intolerant' superstition of his age. On leaving Athens, Aristotle directed his steps to Chalcis in Eubrea, and in this retreat he spent the remainder of his days. Here he was waited up- on by the whole company of his disciples -and fol- lowers, who besought him to make choice of a suo cessor, to whom they might look up as the director and finisher of their studies. The pre-eminent me- rits of Theophrastus and Eudemus, the latter from Rhodes and the former of Lesbos, were universally acknowledged ; and in deciding their claims, the prudent sage, to avoid giving offence, had recourse to a gentle artifice. Having requested a draught of Rhodian wine, he admitted it was strong and plea- sant ; but when he had tasted the Lesbian, he pro- nounced it the sweeter of the two — thus leaving his auditors to infer, in the true style of eastern parable, on whom his choice had fallen. Theophrastus wat not only remarkable for genius and erudition : he ex- celled as an orator, as the very name imports which is expressive of his divine eloquence. His writings were numerous, and Diogenes has preserved the 54 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. titles of above 200 treatises, only a few of which are extant. The fame of the Lycaeum, which the Stagirite himself had maintained unimpaired through life, was amply sustained by his successor, whose increasing reputation soon attracted an audience of 2000 scholars. His friendship was courted by some of the most powerful kings and princes of his time, amongst whom were Cassander and Ptolemy, who had succeeded Alexander on the thrones of Macedon and Egypt. Aristotle did not long survive his retirement to the shores of Euboea. He died within twelve months after leaving Athens ; persecution and exile having probably shortened his days, as he was only in his sixty-third year. The manner of his death, like various circumstances in his life, gave rise to many false and contradictory reports. St Justin says that he died of shame and vexation at not be- ing able to explain the cause of the tides in the Eu- ripus, an arm of the sea on which Chalcis stood, and which, as Lucian avers, ebbed and flowed seven times in twenty-four hours. Upon this assertion has been engrafted the puerile story, that he threw himself into the waves in despair, exclaiming, " Eu- ripus shall take Aristotle, since Aristotle cannot comprehend Euripus." Suidas states that he poi- soned himself by drinking hemlock — an assertion at variance with truth, and rendered altogether impro- oable, from the fact, that in his writings the Stagirite always speaks of suicide as a shameful and cowardly MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 55 crime. According to Laertius, Dionysius, and other creditable authors, his death was occasioned by the natural infirmity of his stomach, which was greatly increased by over- watching and excess of study. To this malady he had long been subject, and to assuage it he was in the habit of applying a bottle of warm oil to his breast. Considering his frequent indisposition, it is more remarkable, as one of his biographers observes, that he lived so long, than that he did not live longer. Some have recorded the dying words which he is said to have addressed to those standing around him, " Thou Cause of Causes have mercy on me ;" but their genuineness may be doubted, as they rest on no authority more ancient than the testimony of a Christian writer. The Sta- girites brought the body of their philosopher from Chalcis to his native place, where it was buried with vast solemnity, and where a magnificent tomb was built, and an altar erected to his memory. Of Aristotle's appearance and habits little is known. In stature he was short, having slendw limbs, a high nose, small eyes, a weak voice, and a stammering hesitation in his speech. It was per- haps to make amends for the niggardly bounty of na- ture, that he took more than ordinary pains in the dress and ornaments of his person. His constitu- tion was delicate and sickly, but he counteracted its infirmities by temperance. His application to books was indefatigable. So incessant was he in the pur- suit of knowledge, that he regularly devoted to it 56 MEMOIR OP ARISTOTLE. those hours which he stole from the necessary sea- son of repose ; for Laertius affirms, that, when he went to bed, he held a hrazen ball in his hand, the noise of which, dropping into a metal basin when he fell asleep, might awake him to resume his studies ; and in this practice he was imitated by his royal pupil Alexander. He was twice married. By his first wife he had a daughter, called after her own name (Pythias), who survived her father, and gave birth to a second Aristotle, of whom nothing except this cir- cumstance has been recorded. His second wife was Herpylis, a native of Stagira, and basely defamed by the enemies of her husband, as a courtezan and a concubine. By her he had an only son, Nicomachus, who was a disciple of Theophrastus, and fell in bat- tle at an early age. To him he dedicated his great work on Morals, called " Nicomachea," which, as it was the last arid principal object of his studies, is of all his performances the longest, the best connected, and incomparably the most interesting. His will, a copy of which is preserved in Laertius, is curious, not merely as throwing some light on hia domestic affairs, but as an example of the distinct yet concise form of ancient testamentary deeds. If indited shortly before he expired, it refutes the fables about his committing suicide, and may be reckoned an evidence that he not only died a natural death, but with a calmness and composure worthy of philosopher. Antipater, the confidential minister a Philip, and afterwards viceroy of Macedon, was ap> MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 57 pointed the executor of this testament, with an autho- rity paramount, as appears, to that of the other per- sons who were afterwards conjoined with him in the guardianship of his widow and children. To Her- pylis, besides other property in money and slaves, was left the choice of two houses, the one in Chal- cis, the other his paternal mansion at Stagira ; with instructions that whichever of them she might prefer to inhabit, might be properly furnished for her re- ception. The testator commends her domestic vir- tues, and requests his friends, that, in testimony of her faithfulness towards him, they would distinguish her by the kindest attention ; and that, should she again think of a husband, they would be careful to provide for her a suitable match. To his son Ni- comachus, and his daughter Pythias, he bequeathed the remainder of his fortune, with the exception of /iris library and writings, which he left to his favourite \ scholar Theophrastus, one of the trustees. It was stipulated, that his daughter, when she attained a marriageable age (being then about fourteen years old), should be given to Nicanor, the son of Proxe- nus, whom he had adopted ; and, failing him, that Theophrastus himself should accept her hand and fortune ; on which happy occasion, four of his slaves were to obtain their manumission. The bones of his first wife he ordered to be disinterred, and laid beside his own, as she herself had requested. None of his slaves were to be sold ; they were all to be either emancipated by his will, or ordered to be set 58 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. free by his heirs, so soon as they seemed worthy of liberty ; an injunction conformable to the maxim in- culcated in his Politics, that slaves of all descrip- tions ought to be liberated whenever they merited freedom, and were qualified for enjoying it. The testament concludes with instructions as to the per- formance of such marks of respect as he considered due to the memory of his relations, and to the religion of his country; viz. the erecting of the statues he had dedicated to Proxenus and his wife ; to his own mother and brother, Arimnestus; and, finally, to Jupiter and Minerva, the Preservers (ZorngE?), which he had vowed to them for the health of Nicanor. These latter were to be placed at Stagira, and to con- sist of " statues of beasts of stone of four cubits." The private character of Aristotle seems to have been irreproachable. That he had many detractors, who envied him his popularity, and have transmitted very unfavourable accounts of his moral qualities, has already been mentioned. Some earned their extravagant censures so high, as to accuse him of every vice that can degrade human nature. He was stigmatized as a glutton, a libertine, and a parasite, adapting his philosophy to the corrupt practices of the great ; as a sordid miser, who sold the oil which he had used medicinally, and even the empty brass pots in which it was contained ; and as an ungrate- ful citizen, who betrayed the place of his birth to the Macedonians. These and numerous other charges were the pure offspring of calumny, and owe their MEMOIR OF AK1STOTLE. 59 propagation to the zeal of philosophical rivalry. The circumstances of his life, and the esteem in which he was universally held by his contemporaries, afford evidence enough, that the dark side of the picture has been greatly overcharged. Of this we have still more decisive proof in the tone and spirit of his writings, especially the ethical part of them, which breathes a purer morality than is to be found in any antecedent author ; a morality, also, avowed- ly practical, and by which he would have stood self- condemned, had his own conduct been at variance with it. " He exhibited a character as a man (says a modern biographer) worthy of his pre-eminence as a philosopher ; inhabiting courts without mean- ness and without selfishness ; living in schools with- out pride and without austerity ; cultivating with ardent affection every domestic and every social vir- tue ; while, with indefatigable industry, he reared that wonderful edifice of science, the plan of which we are still enabled to delineate from his imperfect and mutilated writings." The humanity of his na- ture appears in the different acts of kindness which he conferred on his relatives and benefactors ; and his scrupulous regard for truth is preserved in his me- morable saying — amicus Socrates, amicus Plato, sed magis arnica veritas, " Socrates is dear, and Plato is dear, but truth dearer than all." He possessed con- siderable facetiousness of disposition ; and in his po- litical works are to be found many strokes of genu- ine humour, little suspected by his commentators. 60 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. As the wisdom of the ancients was often conveyed in apophthegms of pithy and oracular brevity, so his gravest maxims were frequently seasoned with inno- cent pleasantry. His smart sayings and quick re- partees were long remembered and admired by those incapable of appreciating his weightier merits. Some of them have been preserved by Laertius, of which a few may be given as examples. Being reproved for bestowing alms on a profligate, he said, " he gave not to the man but to humanity." Being ask- ed, what of all things grows soonest old ? he replied, " Gratitude." Of friendship he said, " it was one soul in two bodies." Being told that one had reviled him, " let him beat me too (said he) when I am ab- sent." To an idle babbler who had detained him. and expressed his fear that he had been tedious, he answered, " Not at all, for I paid no attention to your discourse." Hearing a conceited youth boast- ing of his fine cloak, " It was but a silly vanity (he said) to be proud of a sheep's fleece." A handsome young man much courted, thus accosted him, " If I were hated by the citizens as you are, I would hang myself." " And I (replied the other) would hang myself if I were admired by them as you are." It was as impossible, he said, for a tattler to keep a secret, as for a man to hold a burning coal in his mouth. Being asked what advantage he had de- rived from philosophy, he answered, " that of doing voluntarily what others do through fear of the laws." Such apophthegms, some of which are probably spu- MEMOIR OP ARISTOTLE. 61 rious, would hardly deserve to be noticed, did they not serve to shew a mind free and unencumbered amidst the abstrusest studies, and a readiness of wit which never failed to check arrogance, and repel the %neers of the impertinent. His unwearied application to study has been al- ready noticed, and he took great pains that his dis- ciples should follow his example. In the Lycaeum their industry was remarkable. An archon, or re- gent, was chosen from amongst themselves every ten days, to superintend their progress and enforce the due observance of the stated rules of the school. Scientific lectures were given, and exercises pre- scribed to the students, both in the dialectical and rhetorical form. To assist them in the acquisition of every kind of learning, their master had taken care to collect a variety of books, which were con- stantly open to their perusal. Strabo, indeed, says that he was the first who formed a regular library ; and that Ptolemy Philadelphia received directions from him as to the proper method of arranging the celebrated one which he founded. That he might have given suggestions as to the collecting and dis- posing of literary works, may be fairly admitted ; but that no considerable libraries existed before his time, is neither probable nor consistent with history which mentions several, both princes and private persons, anterior to that age, who had made collec- tions, and possessed repositories of books. His con- duct towards the writers that preceded him, haa 62 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. been censured with more acrimony than justice. Lord Bacon says, that, after the manner of the Otto- man princes, he thought his throne could not be se- cure unless he killed all his brethren. Ludovicus Vives charges him with detracting from all philoso- phers, that he might appropriate that glory to him- self of which he had robbed them. It has also been averred that he rarely quotes an author but with a view to censure, and is not very fair in represent- ing the opinions which he censures ; and that, after collecting from the works of the ancients what he intended to confute, he committed them to the flames, that no evidence might remain of his misrepresenta- tions. His passion for fame was undoubtedly great ; and Bacon's opinion is not without probability, that his ambition was as boundless as that of his royal pupil — the one aspiring at universal monarchy over the bodies and fortunes of men ; the other over their opinions. If such were the case, it cannot be said that the philosopher pursued his aim with less ability or less success than the hero. But the allegation that he burnt the works of his predecessors, is con- tradicted by the circumstance of his having establish- ed a reading depot in the Lycaeum, and by the fact that most of the books said to have been thus de- stroyed, are mentioned by Cicero as extant in his time. Whatever advantages Aristotle derived from ac- cess to an extensive perusal of the literary labours of others, he was too honest to plume himself with a borrowed reputation ^here is a candour and man- MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 63 liness strikingly discernible in all his writings ; not professedly set forth, but interwoven with the tex- ture of his discussions, and rather betrayed uncon- sciously than demanding to be recognised. His knowledge acquired by reading can therefore only be reckoned an accidental help to the display of those amazing powers of reason and reflection which he naturally possessed, and which may be said to have qualified him to survey, with the discerning eye of intuition, every object of human understanding. There is scarcely a phenomenon which the natural world presents, or the human mind conceives to be the subject of scientific or speculative investigation, to which he did not extend his inquiries. In his Ethics he has given a full and satisfactory delineation of the moral nature of man, and of the discipline and exercise best adapted to its improvement. In his Politics he considers men in their social capacity, depending mainly for their happiness and perfection on the public institutions of their respective coun- tries. To ascertain what are the different arrange- ments that have been found, under given circum- stances, practically most conducive to these grand and ultimate purposes, is the important question which he undertakes to solve. The labour he be- stowed on the inquiry may be conceived from the fact, that he had carefully examined two hundred systems of legislation, many of which are nowhere else described. In what may be termed speculative science he stood unrivalled, and it was in this tie- 64 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. partment that the fertility and ingenuity of his intel- lect was most signally displayed. Some authors accuse him of having studied to be obscure for the sake of being thought original, and of being less anxious to discover truth than to ac- quire fame. " His writings (says Dr Reid) carry too evident marks of that philosophical pride, va- nity, and envy, which have often sullied the charac- ter of the learned. He determines boldly things above all human knowledge, and enters upon the most difficult questions, as his pupil entered upon a battle, with full assurance of success. He delivers his decisions oracularly, and without any fear of mis- take. Rather than confess his ignorance, he hides it under hard words and ambiguous expressions, of which his interpreters may make what they please. There is even reason to suspect that he wrote often with affected obscurity, either that the air of mys- tery might procure greater veneration, or that his hooks might be understood only by the adepts who had been initiated in his philosophy." * That there may be some truth in the charge of vanity cannot be denied, and this " infirmity of noble minds" was to be expected in a man who had the daring ambition to be transmitted to all future ages as the Prince of Philosophers — as one who had earned every branch of human knowledge to its utmost limit. But it is manifestly unfair to impute to him all the obscurities, errors, and contradictions, that are now to be fonnd *** Reid's Analysis of Aristotle's Logic. MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 65 in his writings ; considering that the greatest, and perhaps the best, part of them are lost, and that his copyists and interpreters have ascribed to him innu- merable opinions which he did not hold ; while by universally confounding his solid sense with the fan- cies of Plato, they have introduced incongruities and absurdities of which he was never guilty. We do not say with some of his extravagant ad- mirers, that he treated all his subjects in a manner complete, so as to surpass every preceding exertion of the human intellect. This eulogium is only partial- ly true. But the praise and merit must be allowed him of having introduced and exemplified a stricter method of philosophising than what had been before observed in the Grecian schools. In every doctrine and theory he excluded the mixtures of poetry and fable which, in some degree, still prevailed ; and he endeavoured to subject every hypothesis to the test of reason and argument. He framed with penetra- tion and acuteness superior to all others, the rules of logical induction and demonstrative reasoning. It was from the accuracy and the novelty of his sys- tem in this respect, as well as from the universality of his genius, which appeared to master every subject of study with equal facility, that some of the ablest judges in antiquity, on perusing his elaborate treatises on the different branches of knowledge, hesitated not to pronounce him " the most excellent in all science, Plato only excepted." This is the opinion of Cicero, to whose philosophical works the world at large is 66 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. more indebted for a familiar notion ot several of Aris- totle's most important doctrines, than to the labours of all his commentators collectively.* The enco- mium, however, must not be understood to imply that the ancients approved exclusively of his physi- cal and moral theories as preferable to all other sys- tems ; or that they gave an entire and unlimited as- sent to all his tenets. Even his own disciples and successors in the Lycaeum disagreed with him on cer- tain points ; nor did the followers of other sects, who commented on parts of his works which they thought most ingenious, espouse his general principles, or acknowledge him their master in philosophy. Such servile adoration did not obtain until the dark age of literature arose, in which all taste for liberal inquiry became extinct, and the human faculties themselves appeared to be sunk in irretrievable torpor. It was then that the benighted world embraced him as an infallible guide, and bowed with submissive indolence to his dogmas. Revering him as an oracle, they be- lieved that where his text was obscure, it was to be explained into some profound meaning which, being inexpressible by any known words, might be denot- ed by terms of their own invention, that had either a very dubious sense, or were as unintelligible as * " Cum omnis ratio diligens disserendi duas habet partes, unam inveniendi, alteram judicandi, utriusque Princeps, ut mihi quidem videtur, Aristoteles fuit." — Cicero in Topic, And again, " Aristoteles longe omnibus (Platonem semper excipio) praestans et ingenio, et diligenfcia." — Tusculan. Q*nest. lib. i. MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 67 the original. By these means was Aristotle at length not merely exalted to the throne of philosophy, but enshrined as it were the inspired and presiding ge- nius of science. Never was papal despotism over the consciences of men more absolute, than was the authority of the Stagirite over their minds and opi- nions. The power of the greatest monarchs on earth must appear fleeting and precarious, when compared with his long and solitary reign in the schools of the middle ages. From this summary of the life and character of Aristotle, we must now turn to give a condensed survey of his voluminous works. According to the most credible accounts, he composed about 400 dif- ferent treatises on the various subjects which then formed the curriculum of scholastic study, including Logic, Rhetoric, Ethics, Politics, Physics, Meta- physics, Mathematics, Optics, Astronomy, Music, Mechanics, Medicine, Philology, Physiology, Natu- ral History, Epistles, and many other topics, which it would be tedious to enumerate. It appeal's that neither he nor Theophrastus were at pains to secure the publication of their works during their lifetime ; and the cause of their negligence or nonperformance of this important task, has been the theme of much conjecture. The solution of the question may de- pend on collateral circumstances with which we are altogether unacquainted : but the current persuasion was, that it arose either from an excess of modesty or prudence ; or, from a diffidence of success in com- 68 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. peting with Plato, who then stood pre-eminent in philosophical fame, and whose opinions he had in se- veral material points impugned. Whatever the fact may be, the carelessness or timidity of Aristotle was fatal to his writings, and had well nigh created a blank in literary history, which might have for ever deprived the world of this invaluable treasury of an- cient learning. The extraordinary fate and miraculous preserva- tion of these works, form a curious episode in the biography of their author ; and the regret which every friend to science must feel, that so much has perished, is heightened by reflecting on the imperfect and mutilated state of the little that re- mains. Whilst the Stagirite distributed his other property to his surviving family, he left the more precious bequest of his library and manuscripts to his favourite disciple Theophrastus, who in his turn bequeathed them to his own scholar Neleus, by whom they were conveyed from Athens to Scepsis, his na- tive place, a city of the ancient Troas, in Asia Mi- nor. The heirs of Neleus, to whom they next de- scended, being neither men of letters, nor lovers of books, (as Strabo relates,) totally neglected the intel- lectual treasure that had most unworthily devolved to them. The magnificence of kings had then be- gun to display itself in collecting works of ge- nius, which were sought out with an eager and la- vish curiosity. It was a taste happy for the causa of literature in general, although in the present in- MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 69 stance, the occasion of serious misfortune. The Scepsions on hearing that Eumenes, king of Perga- mus, in whose dominions they lived, was making ex- tensive researches with the view of forming a large library, resorted to a selfish expedient for securing their literary property from the rapacious hands of their sovereign. With the caution incident to the subjects of a despot, who often have recourse to con- cealment in order to avoid robbery, they hid the books under ground ; and in this subterranean ce- metery the writings of Aristotle, as well as the vast collection of materials from which they had been composed, lay buried for many generations, a prey to dampness and worms. Some authors, such as Bayle and Patricius, allege that Neleus sold the original works and the whole library to Ptolemy Philadel- phus of Egypt, after having transcribed them ; and that it was only the copies and not the originals that vere exposed to the unworthy fate of rotting in a humid cell. But the supposition is altogether im- probable. On the one hand it is hardly credible thai so many thousand volumes could have been tran- scribed in so short a time ; and on the other, it is reasonable to believe that the philosophy of the Ly- caeum would have struck deeper root and mace greater progress in the Egyptian capital than it ever did, had the genuine works of the Stagirite adorned the library of Alexandria, under the first Ptolemies. In their catacomb at Scepsis, the manuscripts re- mained until their very existence seems to have been 70 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. forgotten. At length, after the lapse of 130 years, and when all hope of their ever seeing the light must have vanished, vanity and avarice accomplished what a nobler motive ought to have done. Apellicon, a rich disciple of the Peripatetic school, whose name has been already mentioned, while residing at Athens, had turned his attention to the collecting of books ; and although a " bibliosophist rather than a philoso- pher," (as Strabo calls him), he courted the ostenta- tion of scholarship, by ordering them to be pur- chased at the dearest rate. The " witless felons of philosophy" at Scepsis heard of his premiums and opened their vault. The volumes of Aristotle and his illustrious successor were thus released from pri- son, or rather dug from the grave, and, with all the injuries of moths and mouldering upon them, sold for a large sum, and carried back to the city where they had been originally written. Their new owner was at the expense of employing a number of copy- ists to transcribe them, himself superintending the task. The work of restoring them was very imper- fectly executed, and this must be attributed not only to the ignorance of the transcribers, but to the tat- tered condition of the manuscripts, and the abstruse nature of the subjects. The most considerable part of his Acroatic works, which are almost the whole of those now remaining, consist of little else than text-books, containing the detached heads of his discourses ; and from a want of connexion in the matter, they have been exposed to additional cor- MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 71 ruption from the conjectural emendations of subse- quent commentators. What became of Aristotle's original manuscripts we are not informed; but the copy remained at Athens until the spoliation of that city by the Ro- mans under Sylla. The library of Apellicon was a tempting object of plunder to the conquerors, who were then awakened to the value of literature ; and accordingly, the whole of this philosophical trea- sure, with other rich booty, were transmitted to Rome. There the works of the Stagirite expe- rienced a better fortune, owing to their having at- tracted the attention of Tyrannio, the famous gram- marian, a native of Amysus in Pontus, who had been taken prisoner by Lucullus in the Mithridatic war, but was afterwards manumitted, in consideration of his learning and merits. By paying court to Sylla's librarian, he obtained leave, after much solicitation, to take copies of the manuscripts, which were commu- nicated to Andronicus of Rhodes, who flourished as a philosopher at Rome in the time of Cicero and Pompey. Having undertaken the task of arranging and correcting those long-injured writings, the Rho- dian performed the duty of a skilful editor, by giving them to the world in a more perfect shape than they had hitherto appeared. Though considerably amend- ed and illustrated, the severe ordeal through which they passed had, in the lapse of nearly 300 years, greatly abridged their number. Out of the 400 toooks recorded by Laertius (and some have made 72 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. them double that amount), only forty-eight have been transmitted to the present age. But many of these last consist of several books ; and, according to the estimate of the laborious Fabricius, the whole of these remains, taken together, form a golden stream of Greek erudition, exceeding four times the collective bulk of the Iliad and Odyssey *. Though the works edited by Andronicus had suf- fered injuries which the utmost diligence and saga- city could not completely repair, yet, in consequence of those labours, the Peripatetic philosophy began to resume the lustre of which it had been deprived since the days of Theophrastus. In the Lycseum, the precepts of the sect were preserved through a line of successive teachers, by viva voce instructions ; and it is not impossible that the disciples may have had portions of their great master's lectures written down ; yet the details of the system were evidently entrusted to the tablets of memory. At Rome, the productions of the Stagirite made few converts at first ; and even in Cicero's time, their perusal was confined to a few of the learned. This sect, there- fore, in the Augustan age, made no considerable ap- pearance in that capital ; and, with the exception of Lucretius, we scarcely find among the Roman poets * By this calculation, the whole of Aristotle's works must have contained a quantity of prose equal to sixteen times 28,088 verses — a fact the more extraordinary, since the greater part of his writings are merely outlines or text- books, giving the heads of his lectures, or the chief topics of discussion in the different branches of science. Wy TTY MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. \^^L7|30RN^: of that period any allusion to the doctrines of the Peripatetic school, or the philosophical renown of its founder. The edition of Andronicus made them better known, as his example of studying and illus- trating them was soon followed hy various other commentators. To enumerate the host of Greek, Latin, Jewish, Arabic, and Christian writers who imitated the Rhodian editor in giving expositions and criticisms on the different works of Aristotle, would be foreign to our purpose. Their very names would fill a vo- lume. From the era of Augustus to the invention of printing, the works of the Stagirite passed through the hands of more than 10,000 commentators ; and after that period, several thousands more were added to the catalogue, amongst whom are to be classed not a few of the venerable fathers of the church, who borrowed from this armoury the intellectual weapons which rendered them invincible in their theological wars. The first generation of these expositors be- gan in the age of the Antonines with the labours of Taurus the Berissean, Adrastus, Alexander the Aphrodissean at Rome, Galen the celebrated physi- cian, Atticus the Platonist, and Ammonius Sacchus of Alexandria. Under the Roman emperors, they continued to flourish ; and in the long list we find the once revered names of Aspasius, Syrianus, Olympiodorus, Plotinus, Porphyry, Themistius, Pro- clus, the second Ammonius, Damascius, Simplicius, Plriloponus, and Johannes Damascenus. By the 74 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. Arabs or Saracens, Aristotle was superstitiously adored, and his philosophy was ardently studied in their schools during upwards of four centuries. His metaphysical niceties were well adapted to the acute mental temperament of that ingenious people. In dispute all parties acknowledged his supremacy, and appealed to his assistance. The doctors of the Mosque easily laid prostrate the most stubborn ar- guments both of Jews and Christians against the truth of the Koran with the resistless artillery of his syllogisms. To translate or produce a commen- tary on his works, appeared to them the highest pitch of excellence to which the genius of man could attain. The most eminent of these oriental exposi- tors, whose fame long resounded even in the schools of Europe, were Alkendi, Alfarabi, Rhazes, Avi- cenna, and Averroes, who, in the felicitous obscu- rity of their opinions, often surpassed their master. When the literature of the Saracens was extinguish- ed at the taking of Bagdad by the Tartars in 1258, the illustration of the Aristotelian philosophy was prosecuted with unabated vigour in the Western Empire. So early as the sixth century, his logic assumed a Latin dress in the translation of Boethius Severinus, the last illustrious Consul of Rome. In this field the venerable Bede has also signalized him- self; and during the middle ages, a few learned monks exercised their ingenuity on the same sub- ject. After a long interval of nearly 700 years, translations and commentaries in the same language MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 75 fregan to abound, through the industry of Albertus Magnus, Thomas Aquinas, Duns Scotus, John Ma- jor (a native of Haddington), Theodore Gaza, Fran- ciscus, a Jesuit of Cordova, with a swarm of gram- marians and scholastics whom the art of typography had multiplied so abundantly that, towards the close of the sixteenth century, Patricius reckoned their number at 12,000. This cold and unintelligible mass of Gothic and Saracenic dulness is now con- signed to just oblivion. It may seem extraordinary that a philosophy thus disfigured by a succession of interpreters often more worthy of ridicule than of admiration, should have so long maintained an absolute ascendency over the minds of men. But the fact is easily explained. During the intellectual slumber of the western world, the human faculties had neither the light of letters to detect false glosses, nor mental energy to eman- cipate reason and conscience from the thraldom of ignorance and superstition. The sway of the Sta- girite, however, was not always untroubled. Launoy enumerates eight different revolutions of his autho- rity in the University of Paris, the oldest and long the most distinguished school in Europe. In the year 1209, his writings were condemned as the pes- tilent sources of heresy, and committed to the flames. In 1542, the same writings were held in such veneration, that whoever denied their ortho- doxy was persecuted as an infidel. Peter Ramus, a Parisian Professor of that age (1551-1572), signa- 76 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. lized himself as among the earliest to impugn the in- fallibility of this great oracle of philosophy. He wrote twenty books of Animadversions against Aris- totle's Logic, eight against his Physics, and fourteen against his Metaphysics — a boldness which proved fatal, as it made him first an exile and at length a martyr. It is but fair to add, that in the glory or disgrace which the schools then attached to his opi- nions, the Stagirite had no concern. The true spi- rit and meaning of his philosophy was completely re- fined away by the fanciful glosses of copyists and cri- tics ; so that those scholastic combatants who banish- ed or murdered each other in his name, fought mere- ly about the husks of science, without the kernel. These observations are particulaily just as ap- plied to the absurd jargon or logomachy which pass- ed for learning, and during five centuries and a half divided Europe between the two renowned sects of Nominalists and Realists ; so called because the for- mer, whose reputed founder was Roscellinus, Canon of Compeigne, in the eleventh century, held the doc- trine of universals in logic to depend solely on names or words, and treated as mere illusions of fancy the Platonic ideas of their opponents, who regarded as their founder the celebrated monk Abelard, immor- talized by his amorous follies and misfortunes, and numbered among their champions Anselm, arch- bishop of Canterbury. Under the banners of one or other of these factions, the learning of Christen- dom arrayed itself during a succession of many ge- MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 77 Derations. In their fierce and scandalous disputes, lie pugilistic doctors proceeded from words to blows, which often terminated in mutilation or death. In the hottest of the fray, the name of Aristotle was continually invoked, and his doctrines appealed to on both sides, though both parties flagrantly violated his authority — the Realists embodying their wild fan- cies under the name of substantial forms — while the Nominalists subtilised all knowledge, even theology itself, into shadowy notions and unmeaning terms. During the prevalence of these gross corruptions in the Schools, and even amid the gloom of Go- thic and Saracenic darkness, a few stars brightened the literary horizon, and voices were raised in favour of genuine philosophy. The calumniated and {&C- secuted Roger Bacon, soaring above the ignorance of his times, maintained that Aristotle, rightly un- derstood, was the fountain of all knowledge ; and he asserted, with equal candour and firmness, that those who had undertaken to translate him were totally unfit for the task. But the beams of this luminary were quenched in the barbarism of the age ; and his •uperior erudition, instead of enlightening, dazzled the weaker eyes of his contemporaries, who referred his wonderful discoveries to magic and the infernal arts. His illustrious namesake, Lord Verulam, ri- valled his fame, but did not possess his candour in regard to Aristotle, whom he studiously copies, and continually abuses, for errors that belong to his in* terpreters and commentators. It is not a little situ- 8 MEMOIR OP ARISTOTLE. gular, that the Stagirite did precisely what he is olamed by Lord Bacon, Hobbes, Malebranche, and other French philosophers, for not doing. The au- thor of the Leviathan frequently combats, under the name of the Peripatetic philosophy, abstract essences, substantial forms, and innumerable other doctrines, metaphysical as well as moral and political, with nearly the same arguments by which Aristotle, their supposed author, had long before victoriously re- futed them. The evil of confounding the simpli- city of this philosophy with Platonism, was igno- rantly perpetuated from age to age, through a suc- cession of critics and commentators, not excepting the latest of them all, Mr Harris and Lord Mon- boddo, who perpetually ascribe to Aristotle the doc- trine of general ideas, which he repeatedly and for- mally denied. His logic was misrepresented by Locke and Lord Kames ; and even Dr Reid speaks of him harshly, as having purposely obscured his analytical rules by unmeaning illustrations. But wherever his principles and tenets have been studied with a competent degree of honesty and informa- tion, they have never failed to produce a conviction of their soundness and perspicuity; and, at the same time, an admiration for the wonderful discoveries and attainments in a man deemed the wisest of an- tiquity, and to whom, even in modern times, it will be easier to name many superiors in particular branches of knowledge, than to find any one rival in universal science. MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 79 To give an analysis of the philosophical and scho- -astic writings of Aristotle, belongs not to a work on natural history. A general notion of their contents may be communicated to the reader in a brief out- /ine. The system of knowledge which prevailed in the schools when the Stagirite began to teach, and in which he had himself been trained, was not such as was likely to satisfy his penetrating mind. It was, in fact, a vast undigested scheme of theoretical wisdom, jumbled together without order, and fluc- tuating in its form and character, according to the talents and circumstances of its leading professors. The Pythagoreans blended physical, mathematical, and moral truth in mystic combination, as exhibited in the mythology of Egypt. In the hands of So- crates, philosophy assumed a more ethical com- plexion ; but the fanciful imagination of Plato in- vested it once more with a mixed character, by em- bodying in one compressed view the various preceding systems. Considering that definitions could not ap- ply to every perceptible object, if (according to the doctrine of Heraclitus) all such objects were constantly changing ; and that numbers (as taught by Pythagoras) could not sufficiently account for that immense variety of objects which the universe pre- sented, he concluded that there must be some exist- ences, independent of the perceptible universe, to serve as the objects of definitions. Hence his famous doctrine of Ideas, or archetypes, corresponding to the different classes of external objects ; and to these 80 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. abstract images he assigned a real being, but capable of intellectual apprehension alone. In this manner he reared a motley system of physical philosophy, on a basis of metaphysics and logic conjointly. Although educated in this school, Aristotle had thought too deeply and accurately not to perceive that the cardinal doctrine of Platonism (ideas), how- ever specious, was rather a shadowy representation, than a solid structure. He saw that the various branches of philosophy were separated from their parent root, or grafted on unnatural stocks ; and that, in order to rest the sciences on a sure founda- tion, a more exact analysis of the principles of hu- man knowledge was required. Accordingly, his grand aim was to develope a truly intellectual sys- tem, instead of the ingenious phantom which the en- thusiasm of Plato had raised. The idols which had been set up in the niches and shrines of the schools, he swept away with a daring hand. In overthrow- ing the doctrine of ideas, he was no less a reformer of the ancient philosophy, than were Bacon and Boerhaave of the modern. It was the object of the one, as well as of the others, to cleanse and recon- struct the temple of science ; to recall men from un- profitable speculations to the realities of nature ; and to lay down rules to guide them in the discovery of sound and infallible principles. Philosophy was regarded by Aristotle, either as furnishing the mind with the means of contemplating external nature, or ministering to the improvement MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. gl and right direction of human life. The three grafjs and disorder resulting from the want of a purer re- ligion, should have given such sound practical ob- servations on human nature, and formed such accurate conceptions of the perfection of human virtue. The work on Politics, comprising eight books, was a necessary sequel to that on Ethics, inasmuch as the precepts of the one, to have a moral effect on man, require to be enforced by the external sanction 84 MEMOIR OP ARISTOTLE. of the other ; for it was the current notion of ancient philosophy, that the laws of the State, and the in- stitution of rewards and punishments, were the great instruments for bringing mankind to that course of action in which their real interest consisted. On this imperfect principle, Aristotle, in common with other Greek philosophers, constructed his theory of politics, which embraces three very important sub- jects, viz. the origin of society and government, the distinctions of rank in a commonwealth, and a com- parison of the best plans of political economy. In the prosecution of this task, besides examining and criticising the systems of others, as Plato, Hippoda- mus, Phaleas, Diocles ; and the polities of Sparta, Lacedaemon, Athens, Crete, Carthage, &c. he dis- cusses all the great leading questions both in civil and economical science ; — the duties of citizens and magistrates ; the different orders of priests ; the best plans of education ; naval and military force ; causes of sedition ; unions and combinations ; monopolies ; commerce and manufactures ; slavery ; freedom ; na- ture of property ; accumulation of stock ; and many other topics, in which the extent of his knowledge is not more remarkable than the soundness of his views. Of the various kinds of government, the monarchical, the aristocratical, the republican, and the democra- tic, he considers the most " perfect polity" to be a mixture of oligarchy and democracy, so blended, that both appear, yet neither preponderate ; and in which no one of the component elements of society has an MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 85 undue influence, but an equal regard is shewn to the claims of freedom, wealth, and virtue. He admits, however, that the public welfare may be promoted under other forms — a monarchy or an aristocracy — as well as under a " polity ;" but the latter he pre- fers, as tending to maintain a due equality of rights and relations among the members of the community. One excellence of his system is, that it admits only the general pursuit of the common weal, which, like the private happiness sketched in his Ethics, is not to be made a distinct object under any particular form, but must be the universal aim of the whole organization of the society, as individual happiness is the result of the general regulation of all the mo- ral principles. It is true that he supposes a society to constitute itself in order to its own moral happi- ness, and herein is the defect of his scheme ; but this selfish principle must be considered as a neces- sary substitute in his system for a divine providence, the operation of which not being admitted or under- stood, he was obliged to have recourse to the agency of nature. Aristotle appears the only political theorist among the ancients who never lost sight of the moral nature of man in his speculations. While most others, not excepting Plato himself, treated human society mere- ly as a physical mass, capable of being moulded into particular forms by the mechanism of external cir- cumstances, he ascribes the formation of the best so- cial constitution to the force of custom, philosophy, 86 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. and laws. His whole treatise well deserves to be studied, both for its political maxims and its histori- cal information. It lays open the elements of stabi- lity and decay inherent in the different theories of government ; and it points out the common principles on which the maintenance of civil order, under any form whatever, must essentially depend. " In this incomparable work (says Dr Gillies), the reader will perceive the genuine spirit of laws, deduced from the specific and unalterable distinctions of governments ; and, with a small effort of attention, may discern not only those discoveries in science unjustly claimed by the vanity of modern writers (Montesquieu, Machia- vel, Locke, Hume, Smith, &c.) ; but many of those improvements in practice, erroneously ascribed to the fortunate events of time and chance in these later and more enlightened times. The same invaluable treatise discloses the pure and perennial spring of all legitimate authority ; for in Aristotle's Politics, and his only, government is placed on such a natural and solid foundation, as leaves neither its origin incom- prehensible, nor its stability precarious ; and his con- clusions, had they been well weighed, must have sur- mounted or suppressed those erroneous and absurd doctrines, which long upheld despotism on the one hand, and those equally erroneous and still wilder suppositions of conventions and compacts which have more recently armed popular fury on the other." The second grand division of Aristotle's philoso- phy, called the Efficient, includes Dialectics or Logic, MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 87 Rhetoric and Poetics, with their accessory and colla- teral sciences. Dialectic, or the art of reasoning, taken in its widest sense, is the method of deducing the probabilities on either side of a question, so framed as to involve one of two contradictory propositions in the answer, according as the affirmative or nega- tive side is adopted. No part of scholastic science stood more in need of amendment than this ; and accordingly his treatise on the subject is the refor- mation of the irregular and confused system in use before his time. Not only does he explain the ge- neral notion of the science, as the art of defending or impugning an opinion ; he takes a wider and more philosophical view, by investigating the grounds both in the structure of language and the connexion of thought, on which all arguments must rest. This art presented a field for the display of singular acuteness, and it was carried by Aristotle to a degree of perfection beyond what any before him had con- ceived. He pointed out the method by which the defender of a thesis might be invincible, and taught the opponent to shew no less insuperable skill in his attacks ; so that every question could easily be per- plexed with endless disputation, and all reasoning made to revolve in a circle. To excel in the ma- nagement of the syllogism was the pride and glory of the schools in the dark ages ; but the extravagant height to which it was carried, was an impediment to knowledge, and a burlesque on moral science. This, however, was an abuse of the system, and 88 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. ought not to be charged as any impeachment of the labours of the Stagirite. His four books of Analytics divided irHo Prior and Posterior, testify how dis- tinct and comprehensive a view he took of this dry and apparently barren subject. The reader cannot fail to mark the exactness of his rules for the con- version of one proposition into another ; and to ad- mit the special claim he has to the invention of To- pics, or general heads of every species of question or argument, together with the most pertinent and ad- vantageous methods of treating them. By way of generalizing this science, he has arranged all the ob- jects of human thought that can be expressed by " single words, under ten Categories or Predicaments ; and in explaining the nature and properties of each, he has opened up to the inquisitive mind a wide field of syllogistic information. The preceding trea- tises, including one book of Interpretation, one of Sophisms, and eight of Topics, form collectively what is now called Aristotle's Organum, or Logic ; a work admirably calculated for sharpening the un- derstanding and expanding the intellectual faculties ; but a work which has been often as grossly misrepre- sented, as it was long most wofully misapplied du- ring those ages when scholastic jargon had usurped the name and the seats of philosophy. In his three books on Rhetoric, Aristotle has dis- played the same extent and variety of learning as in his Ethics. He treats it not merely as the science of eloquence and composition, but as the art of per MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 89 suasion; and although he lays down excellent rule* for the structure of sentences, and the skilful use of ornaments in style, he cautions the orator to consi- der them as subordinate to the proper business of his profession. He dissuades him from imitating the practice, then too common, of appealing to the passions of the hearers, rather than to their judg- ment and understanding ; but he recommends him to study every variety of human character, and to '••vail himself of the moral feelings, and even of the natural prejudices, of his auditory. His division of the art is threefold, according to the different occa- sions on which it was employed among the Greeks : 1 . The deliberative ; or its use in political debates. 2. The judicial; or its use in popular assemblies, as those of Athens, in which the people collectively exercised the judicial functions. 3. The demonstra- tive; or its use in panegyric and invective, where the orator had only to gratify his hearers by a dis- play of eloquence. In these several heads of in- quiry, he has given an admirable analysis of the mo- tives by which mankind at large are commonly ac- tuated in their conduct and opinions. All the wind- ings and recesses of the human heart he has ex- plored ; all its caprices and affections ; whatever tends to excite, to irritate, to amuse, or to gratify it, have been carefully examined ; the reason of these pheno- mena is demonstrated, and the method of creating them is explained. Nothing, in short, has been left untouched, on which Rhetoric, in all its branches. 90 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. has any bearing. The whole treatise is a text-book of human feeling, — a storehouse of taste and intel- lectual gratification. The Poetics of Aristotle is a mere fragment, one book only remaining out of three of which the trea- tise originally consisted ; but, imperfect as it is, it has been uniformly regarded as the great authority of the laws of criticism in poetry. The portion extant is almost exclusively confined to the consideration of the drama. The remarks on Tragedy, Comedy, and the Epos, are singularly applicable to the prin- ciples of modern criticism ; making allowance for the difference of manners and opinions, and the dissimi- larity of taste which the advancement of society has created between the dramatic models of Athens, and those of the nineteenth century. The loss of this part of the work is the more to be regretted, as it most likely contained much valuable information concerning Greek writers, whose works, perhaps whose names, are now unknown. The Theoretic branch of Aristotle's philosophy, comprehending Physics, Mathematics, and Meta- physics, is the most entertaining, but at the same time the most defective part of his works. The term Physics appears to have been, understood in the Peripatetic School in a very extensive sense, com- prising the science of beings corporeal and incor- poreal, and also that of substance in general, with its attributes and properties, abstractly considered. What is now called Metaphysics, did not receive MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 91 that appellation from the Stagirite himself, who has not treated the three subdivisions of this branch as separate sciences, but often blends their different principles in the same discussion. The name is un- known in his original works, and arose from the cir- cumstance of certain treatises on what he denomi- nates the First Philosophy or Theology, being placed in the edition of Andronicus the Rhodian, after the Physics.* This arrangement was adopted by other commentators, and as the subjects were of an ab- struse and speculative nature, the term was applied by the schoolmen to what in modern writers is de- signated by the Philosophy of Human Mind. In his Physical disquisitions, the genius of Aristotle plunged into an abyss, which it could not fathom ; and in at- tempting definitions of the terms, act, poiuer, pro- perty, accidence, substance, energy, potentiality, &c. he shewed the futility of endeavouring to explain what is indefinable, merely by substituting words instead of ideas. In considering Being in union with matter, and investigating those universal prin- ciples under which he conceived all existing things to be arranged, he fell into the absurdity of con- founding mental impressions with the facts which nature presented to his observation. Instead of look- * Andronicus is said to have prefixed to the twelve or fourteen books, which had no title, the epithet ret ^rx, TO. (putrixa. (metaphysica), the things after the physics ^ to signify that he found these books so placed in the original collec- tion, or to intimate that he judged this to be their proper position. 92 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. ing tv> the phenomena of the material universe, he employed himself in deducing consequences from metaphysical and mathematical data ; — arguing from the mere abstract notions of the mind, to the reali- ties of the external world. The first portion of his physical philosophy, contained in the treatise en- titled Natural Auscultations, is devoted to inquiries into the principles of the science, in order to ascer- tain those fundamental conceptions of its several ob- jects, from which all conclusions concerning them are deduced. These principles he reduces to three : I . Matter ; 2. Form ; 3. Privation ; so well known and so much perverted in the jargon of the schools. The design of his inquiry being to obtain, by physical analysis, an ultimate point to which all the various notions involved in the speculation of nature might be inferred, he proceeds to explain these natural ob- jects to be such as have in themselves a principle of motion and rest, as contrasted with works of art, the principle of which is in the artist. From examining this inherent principle, and shewing how it operates in producing the ordinary appearances observed in the world around us, he is led to account for the processes of generation and corruption, and the changes which occur in bodies by alteration, mix- ture, locomotion, increase and decrease, &c. The great doctrine of the ancient physics, " that nothing could be produced out of nothing," according to his theory, required no distinct consideration. In- quiring into nature simply as a principle of motion, MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 93 or a self- working power, he was not called upon to show how those changes which took place in the material world might be satisfactorily accounted for. It was no part of his philosophy to demonstrate that any particular material, or combination of materials, was employed in these processes of nature for ef- fecting her productions and transmutations. All he assumes is, that some material or other is used in every instance of a physical object, to effect that con- stitution of it in which its " form" consists. From considering this question, he proceeds to examine what principles reject and exclude one another in the various changes of the material world ; these be- ing the causes of the transition of one nature into another : — the presence of one involving the priva- tion of all those forms of matter dependent on the other. What these mutually excluding principles are, he decides by a reference to the sense of touch ; that being the proper evidence to us of the existence of body, as may be inferred from its resistance to that faculty. According to this theory, the contra- rieties ascertained by touch, and which account for all the different forms of matter, are hot and cold, dry and moist ; the first two as active principles, the last two as passive. These four principles admit only of four combinations ; it being impossible that the contraries of heat and cold, or moist and dry, can co-exist. The effect of each combination is a different element ; thus, fire is a coalition of hot and dry ; air, of hot and moist ; earth, of cold aijd dry ; water, of cold 94 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. and moist. Any of these elements may pass int another by the privation of one of the combine principles ; for instance, water into air by the priv tion of cold, and the consequent union of hot with the moist that remains. When the change is simply in the affections or attributes of some existing body, the process is that of alteration ; but when the change involves an entire transmutation of the original ma- terial, the process is that of generation and corrup- tion. Upon these complex principles did Aristotle account for all the phenomena, sensible and tangible, that take place in the material universe around us. The heavenly luminaries, as constituting a branch of physics, demanded his attention from their neces- sary connexion with the full development of his theory of motion, and in order to trace up that prin- ciple through its successive impulses from this lower world to the First Cause or Prime Mover. His whole astronomy is dependent on those speculative notions which he had adopted of lightness and heavi- ness as intrinsic and absolute properties of bodies, by which the exact position of each of the material elements was regulated in the mundane system. Fire he placed in the extreme point upwards ; earth lowest ; and in the intermediate space, air and wa- ter. On some points, his notions were tolerably cor- rect. He admits the spherical form of the earth, from the evidence of lunar eclipses, in which he had remarked that it always exhibited a curved outline and he inferred its magnitude to be not very great, MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 95 (about 37,000 miles) from the variation of horizon consequent on a slight change of our position on its surface.* But in most other respects, his views partook of the current errors of antiquity. The earth, he concluded, must be at rest, and therefore formed the centre of the universe. That the whole hea- vens were spherical, he supposed to be a necessary consequence of the perfection belonging to them : — a solid being the most perfect mathematical dimen- sion, since angular bodies would necessarily imply vacuities in space. The revolutions of the celestial bodies he con- ceived to be performed, not in consequence of a ten- dency to the centre, but of the absence of any such tendency ; — a principle directly opposite to that of modern astronomy. That they do not revolve in themselves, he considered to be evident from the fact, that the moon always presents the same side to the earth. Their motion, therefore, resulted from being carried round by revolving spheres ; the first in order being that in which the fixed stars are placed, next the five planets, then the sun, and lastly the moon nearest to the earth. This idea of the stars revolving in solemn silence, was contrary to the * It is curious how nearly Aristotle approached, but on a different principle, to Columbus's notion of a western passage to India. In his book De Cce/o, he observes, " those who supposed the region about the columns of Hercules (Gibral- tar) conjoined with that of India, and the sea to be thus one mass, seem to conceive what is not very incredible ; alleging as they did in evidence of their conclusions, that elephants were found at both extremities/4* 96 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. I beautiful fancy of the Pythagoreans ahout the music of the spheres ; for, according to Aristotle, they could emit no sound as they moved with their spheres " like the parts of a ship with the ship." To account for the apparent irregularities in their motions, he ima- gined that there were as many additional spheres employed in the revolutions of each body, as it ap- peared to have different motions. The necessity of explaining what it was that im- parted to the different spheres their principle of mo- tion, led him to carry his speculations up to some ultimate cause, itself unmoved, in which they had their origin; hence the close connexion with the physical and the metaphysical philosophy of Aris- totle; and hence too the reason why he gave the lat- ter science the designation of theology. According to him, the several spheres of the heavens presented a distinct class of beings (OVO-M) or substances, whose principle of motion he considered to be the vital energy itself in which they had their existence ; but it does not appear that he attributed to them a proper divinity in themselves, although he speaks of them as possessed of a divine nature, for he refers their perpetuity of motion to the ultimate principle or First Mover — the Deity of his system. This great first principle he regarded merely in a metaphysical point of view ; for it must be observed, that in his philosophy there is no notion of a Divinity inculcated a* the Creator and Governor of the universe ; it is merely as the sou! — the intellect — the energy — the excellence and perfection of the system that he con- MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. templates the Divine Being ; it is, in short, pure be- ing abstracted from all matter, and therefore only negatively defined as without parts or magnitude, impassable, invariable, and eternal. But whilst his system included no Providence, it has the merit of excluding the operation of chance and accident. These, he observes, are not capable of being causes of any thing ; they are merely descriptions of what takes place contrary to some presupposed design, or some tendency in nature. His theory of the soul or living principle, is more rational than that of most ancient philosophers. In accordance with the system of his physics, he wisely avoids endeavouring to refer it to any particular class of material objects; — explaining its nature as an in- stance of the union of the two principles, matter and form, in a common result. His definition thus main- tains the distinctness of body and soul as a combina- tion of two substances ; without, however, defining what the soul is in itself. From this view, it may be perceived to what extent he acknowledged the im- mortality of man. In so far as human nature is purely intellectual, he conceived it capable of exist- ing separately from matter, and in some sense di- vine ; but in so far as it consisted of passions and af- fections, he regarded it as mortal, and necessarily perishable with the body. As to the nature of that immortality which he thus attributes to the intellect, he makes no explanation ; speaking of it as a rheto- rician rather than with the precision of a philoso- MEMOIR OP ARISTOTLE. I pher. His sentiments on this subject are fully stated in his book on the Soul ; and in several smaller trea- tises on the Parts and Motives of Animals, — on Per- ception,— on the Duration of Life, — Youth and Old Age, — Life and Death, — Respiration, — Memory, — Sleep, — Waking and Dreaming ; and to these may he added his book on Physiognomy, and his Trea- tise on Animals, which, though properly a work of Natural History, is also illustrative of the nature of the soul, considered as the living principle in all ani- mated beings. In Mathematics, little comparatively has been left of what Aristotle must have written. The only treatises under this head, are the Mechanical Ques- tions, and a book on Indivisible Lines. But as he had been trained in the school of Plato, whose threshold was impassable to those who had not drunk deeply at the fountain of geometry, and attained a perfect skill in the methods of mathematical investi- gation then known, we may infer that his studies in this department were as minute and extensive as in others in which more of his writings have been preserved. Of this, indeed, we require no better proof, than may be gathered from passages in his physics, in which We find him often establishing con- clusions by steps of mathematical demonstration. To this class may be referred his treatise called the Problems, containing queries chiefly on subjects be- longing to Natural Philosophy, with brief answers ; and a curious fcpact against the doctrines of Xerio- MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE, 99 phones, and Zeno the Eleatic, which shews the vast research and sagacity of his observations. He has separately discussed the nature of colours, and of the objects of hearing. He has also explained the causes of meteors, comets or bearded stars (Truyu- ntai), earthquakes, exhalations, clouds, rain, snow, the galaxy, the rainbow, and other phenomena of the atmosphere, in a work on Meteorology, His books on plants and minerals have perished ; but we learn from himself that he had given an account of all the different fossils and metals. He is also said to have written on Comparative Anatomy, but that work no longer remains.* It is chiefly in his character as the historian and interpreter of Nature that Aristotle ought to be con* templated in a work like the present. His know- ledge in this department was as varied and compre- hensive as in political and speculative science ; his object being to accumulate and digest all that was then known of the structure and productions of the earth ; and if we may judge of what is lost by what has come down to us entire, it would be no easy matter to determine whether most admiration was * The treatise on Plants, edited with his works, is ac- knowledged to be by Theophrastus, whose writings, from the circumstances connected with their preservation, might naturally be confounded with those of his master. The treatise De Mundo, as also the collections of wonderful Narratives, and perhaps the Fragment on the Winds, are reckoned spurious, and have been rejected from the number of his works, the internal evidence being against their in** puted authorship. 1 00 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. to his descriptions of the terraqueous glo with its seas, rivers, mountains, and volcanoes ; or his minute diligence in investigating the several ob- jects of the animal, vegetable, and mineral kingdoms. JFortunate it is for Natural Science, that both his History of Animals, and his philosophy respecting that history, have reached us in a far more -perfect state than any other portion of his physiological writings. On the subject of Zoology, his treatises were comprised in fifty books, of which twenty-five are happily preserved. It is quite immaterial to our purpose, to inquire whether this immense body of Natural knowledge is to be considered as containing the result of his own observations only, or whether it is a collection of all that had been observed by others. The latter is most probably the case ; so vast an undertaking being evidently too much for any one man to accomplish. It may seem extraor- dinary, that, in an early age, without the inventions and improvements of modern philosophy, and on a branch of science which is naturally progressive, so vast a mass of information should have been col- lected and arranged by a solitary individual, how- ever long his life, and however great his leisure. But Aristotle was the friend of a man as extraor- dinary as himself, who generously supplied him with the means of at once gratifying his taste for univer- sal learning, and conferring an invaluable benefit on posterity. The' conquests of Alexander, and his .arches through so many distant and different coun- MEMOIR OP ARISTOTLE. 101 tries, presented singular opportunities for gathering materials on Zoological history ; and accordingly, Pliny informs us that some thousands of persons Were employed for this purpose, both in Greece and the East, and at an expense of £200,000. The same author labours to describe with what ardour and zeal that illustrious hero, during the course of his expedition, collected and sent to his preceptor whatever rarities were to be found in parks, or ponds, or aviaries, or hives, or were to be procured by hunt- ing, fishing, and fowling, throughout the wide ex- tent of Asia*. Such were the resources which the Stagirite had at his command for writing the His- tory of Animals, besides the assistance of a volumi- nous library, in which, no doubt, was treasured up the knowledge of preceding naturalists. By com- bining with the descriptions in his books the obser- vations of those living wonders transported from the * The following is the original passage in Pliny in re- ference to this subject i " Alexandro magno rege inflam- mato cupidine animalium naturas noscendi, delegataque commentatione Aristoteli, summo in omni scientia viro, ali- quot millia hominum in totius Asiae Graeciaeque tractu pa- rere jussit, omnium quos venatus, aucupia, piscatusque ale- bant, quibusque vivaria, armenta, alvearia, piscinas, avi- aria, in cura erant ; ne quid usque in gentium ignoraretur ab eo, quos percontando quinquaginta ferme voluminibus ilia praeclara de animalibus condidit." — Nat. Hist. lib. viiL c. 17. The sum of 800 talents, which, according to Athe- naeus, was granted by Alexander to his preceptor for the improvement of science, may be estimated at one-fifth part of the annual expense of the army by which that prince conquered Asia. 102 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. East, the recluse philosopher of Athens, while h» pupil was conquering the world, composed, in the tranquil shades of the Lycaewm, that immortal work which Pliny professed to abridge, and which Buffon despaired to rival. The History of Animals occupies nine bookvs : the remaining sixteen are employed in explaining their general affections or properties, and their prin- cipal parts or members ; viz. four treat of their se- veral parts, five of generation, and the rest of their sensations and motions, in the knowledge of which particulars he considered the philosophy of zoology chiefly to consist. As he extends that term to whatever has animal life, the first four books of his history, beginning with the outward conformation of animals, divides and distinguishes, (in comparison with the human form as that which is most fami- liarly known), the inhabitants of the earth, the water, and the air, from the enormous whale, and massy elephant, to the scarcely perceptible productions of dust and rottenness; — enumerating, with surprising accuracy, the agreements, and differences, and ana- logies, that prevail in point of external organization among all the living tribes of nature. In the three subsequent books, he examines the different classes of animals, with respect to the commencement, du- ration, and term of their generative powers. His eighth book examines their habitation and nourish- ment ; and the conclusion of the history details their manners and habits^ enumerates their friends and MEMOIR OF ARJSTOTUE. 103 enemies, and explains the ordinary means by which each ctess provides for its preservation and defence. In taking this wide survey of animated nature, Aristotle pretends not to exhaust its infinitely va- ried branches, for these defy the grasp of science ; but in the multitude of important and well as- certained facts which he relates, and which is in- comparably greater than will be found in any work of equal compass, it is his main purpose to illustrate the general heads above mentioned, and to expound the properties or affections common to the greatest or most distinguished portion of the whole animal kingdom. To these general heads or common pro- perties, he constantly has respect in the historical part of the work ; so that his minutest observations respecting the humblest and least perfectly organized animal are often found to elucidate or confirm some important law of the animal economy *. His sys- tem, inasmuch as the range of his observation was limited, was necessarily defective. The world created by the microscope had not any existence for the phi- losophers of antiquity. By means of this and other inventions, the chain of being has been extended far beyond what the unassisted eye could possibly have reached. Our wider acquaintance with the different regions of the globe, has increased our knowledge of the animal kingdom ; and our superiority in ex- perimental science has thrown new light on the struc- ture and functions of the animal economy. The ap- * Gilliea's New Analysis of Aristotle's Works, voL i. p, 146. 104 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. plication of glasses has multiplied and magnified to our sight the almost endless succession and ever- diminishing tribes of insects, and enabled us to exa- mine more accurately their germs and organs. Yet nevertheless, with all these advantages, it is sur- prising how nearly the facts collected by Aristotle correspond with the advanced state of knowledge at the present time ; and in certain departments, Birds and Fishes, for example, it will not be easy to prove that modern writers have added much of import- ance to his observations. An eminent naturalist of the last century (Cavolini), in speaking concerning the development of the impregnated eggs of shell- fish, and the little attention which the subject had received, pays the following well-merited compliment to the minute information of the Stagirite : " When I. consider this defect, and turn to Aristotle's His- tory of Animals, I am seized with astonishment on finding that he should have fully and distinctly seen the facts which we have been able only very imper- fectly to perceive ; that he should have described them with the utmost precision, and compared them with the well-known observations concerning the eggs of birds. My astonishment is the greater, when I reflect that he was unassisted by micro- scopes, which instruments have in our days been brought to great perfection." In chemistry, botany, and mineralogy, we scarce- ly find any thing approaching to a system among ihe ancients ; but in the animal kingdom, the true MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 105 principles of classification seem to have been almost as clearly understood in the age of Aristotle as it is in that of Buffon and Cuvier. It was not reasonable, indeed, to expect that, antecedently to the know- ledge of the circulation of the blood, of respiration, .*nd also of the physiology of the absorbent and ner- vous system, a natural classification could have been accomplished on principles so satisfactory as has been done by modern philosophy; yet on comparing the zoology of the Slagirite with that of our times, we discover that, even in the infancy of science, there is frequently sufficient light, in the uniformity of Nature's laws, to guide the mind in deducing ge- ' neral conclusions from a systematic examination of facts. The progress of knowledge has shewn the existence of such a general coincidence and harmony of relation between the several component parts of an individual animal, that even a partial acquaintance with the details of its structure will enable the inquirer to ascertain its true place in the scale of organization ; and hence, although Aristotle knew nothing of the circulation of the blood, or of the general physiology of the nervous system, and even comparatively little of the osteology of animals, yet subsequent disco- veries have scarcely disturbed the order of his ar- rangement. He placed the whale, for instance, in the same natural division with common quadrupeds, because he saw that, like them, it is viviparous, and suckles its young, and respires by lungs and not by gills; and to this class it still belongs — the 106 MEMOIR t)F ARISTOTLE. circulation of the blood, a8 well as the arrangement of its nervous system, being essentially the same a* in viviparous quadrupeds. With reference to animal life generally, he notices the gradual advances made by Nature from the state of inanimate matter to that of living beings, whence arose the difficult^ he felt in ascertaining the common boundary of the two divisions. In the scale of ma- terial existence, he observes that plants immediately succeed to lifeless forms of matter ; holding, as it were, a middle rank between animals and all other organic bodies. His notion that inanimate sub- stances graduate into life, as reptiles are alleged to have sprung from the mud of the Nile, is erroneous; but the difficulty which he felt in defining the ex- act limit between animal and vegetable organization, still exists, and is admitted by physiologists, after the lapse of more than 2000 years. The only for- mal terms of classification employed by Aristotle are species (e^o?), and genus (ysvc?) ; of the first of which he gives a remarkably precise definition — as an assemblage of individuals, in which not only the whole form of any one resembles the whole form of any other, but each part in any one resembles the corresponding part in any other. His application of the term genus is more vague, and sometimes ex- tends to what we now denominate by tribe, family, order, or even class. He was quite aware of the necessary connexion between the blood and the life of an animal : and he uses the colour of that fluid MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 107 for the purpose of distinctive description — calling those animals which have red blood IMU/U*, and those which have it not red avouy,* ; and thus he esta- hlishes a fundamental natural division, answering to the red-blooded and white-blooded animals of mo- dern zoology. Another distribution of the several classes is into those which have blood, and those which have not; — among the former are man, vivi- parous and oviparous quadrupeds, birds, fishes, ceta- ceous animals, and serpents ; while the latter com- prise those naturally divisible into segments, as in- sects, those of a soft substance throughout, as cuttle- fish, &c. those having a comparatively soft shell, as lobsters, &c. and those which have a hard shell, as oysters, &c. In examining the component members of animals in general, it has been already observed, that Aris- totle selected man as a standard of comparison, al- leging as a reason, that we are more familiar with I the human form than with any other : hence it fol- lows, as a necessary consequence, that viviparous animals, birds, reptiles, and fishes, would respec- tively come next in succession ; and this order he actually observes in making his classification. Some have found fault with this arrangement, on the ground of .its commencing with animals of a more complicated instead of those of a more simple struc- ture, but there seems no good cause for the objec- tion ; and it is no mean encomium on the Stagirite to observe, that the same principle of arrangement 108 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. has been adopted by almost if not all modern natu- ralists, if we except Lamarck. Cuvier, Aristotle's great rival in this department, has not only followed it, but seems literally to have copied his descriptions in some natural groups and individual species of ani- mals, particularly the class of Mammalia. Professor Kidd of Oxford, in his Bridgewater Treatise on the " Physical Condition of Man," to which we are in- debted for some of the preceding remarks, has exhi- bited in parallel columns a comparison between the Grecian and the French philosopher in their phy- siological account of certain species ; arid he con- cludes that, with respect to those points in the his- tory of animals equally accessible to both writers, the descriptions of the former are hardly inferior in accuracy to those of the latter. The examples ad- duced are those of man, ruminating animals, ceta- ceous animals, the elephant, the lion, the ape, the mole, the hedgehog, and the porcupine. " Nor does this observation" (continues the learned Professor) " hold with reference to the more common animals only : it is equally remarkable with reference to those which are of comparative rarity; in support of which assertion, I would refer, among other instances, to the description of the Sepia, and of the Chameleon, and of the evolution of the egg of the bird during incubation." It is remarkable, that, from the age of Aristotle to nearly that of Linnaeus, no systematic classifica- tion of animals was attempted — none at least was ge- MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. 109 nerally adopted. Soon after the commencement of the last century, the Swedish naturalist directed his attention to the suhject, and distributed the whole animal kingdom into six classes — Mammalia, Birds, Reptiles, Fishes, Insects, and Worms ; in which dis- tribution, Lamarck observes, that he improved on Aristotle, first by using the more distinctive term Mammalia, and placing the Cetacea in that class ; and next by making a distinct class of Reptiles, and arranging them betwixt Birds and Fishes. If this alteration, which has been subsequently adopted by all other zoologists, be made, Aristotle's arrange- ment of vertebratcd animals agrees with that of the present day ; and in distributing all other animals into four classes, which Linnaeus distributes into two only, the Stagirite must be considered as having proceeded on the more philosophical principle, be- cause the species of those animals, taken collective- ly, are much more numerous and much more diver- sified in their form and structure than the species of vertebrated animals *. In Entomology, the claims of Aristotle as a great and original genius have been admitted by some of the most competent judges of modern times. Of the class Insecta, it has been affirmed, that Linnaeus himself had not those precise ideas of its limits which the philosopher of Athens had adopted so many centuries before. The following Tabular View * Kidd's Treatise on the Adaptation of External Na- ture to the Physical Condition of Man, p. 319. 110 MEMOIR OF ARISTOTLE. of what may be called his system, has been drawn ^p from his works, especially the History of Ani- mals: Coleoptera. Pedetica = Orthoj. tera sanatoria, I tr. Astomata = Hemiptera, Latr. Psychae = Lepidoptera. majora= Neuroptera, L. Pterota vel Ptilota TVtrn nt Pm -I Orthoptera cursoria, Lat letrapteraK Qpisthocentra = Hymen- op tera. f minora = Musca, TipiL- Diptera -j Emprotthocentra-Ct*fe^ * Stomoxys,Tabanus,&c. Pterota simul f Myrmex = Formica, L. et Aptera ( Pygolampis =Lampyris9 L. Aptera " It may be further stated, that Aristotle perceived also the distinction between the Mandibulata and Hausiellata of modern authors: for he observes, that some insects having teeth are omnivorous; while others, that have only a tongue, are supported by li* quid food. He appears to have regarded the Hi/- menoptera.) or some of them, as forming a third sub- class ; since he clearly alludes to them, when he says that many have teeth, not for feeding, but to help them in fulfilling their instincts. " From the above statement it will appear, that this great philosopher had no contemptible notion — though he has only distinguished three of them as larger groups, by appropriate names — of the majo- rity of the order of insects at present admitted. His Coleoptera, Psych N i; vi KHAN CTM. Satire of the Molucca Islands . ^ UNJVE^SITY^ ^ 1^, THE CRESTED POLYPLECTRON. Polyplectron emphanum — TEMMINCK. PLATE V. JBperonniei a Toupet, Polyplectron emphanum, Temminck, Planches Coloriees, p. 540. THIS bird, of remarkably rich plumage, forms part Df the collection of the Prince of Essling, and was supposed to have been received from the Sunda md Molucca Islands. It is about the size of the Argus polyplectron. The forehead and crown are idorned with a crest of long, narrow, and loose fea- ;bers, and, with the neck and breast, are of a rich )luish-black, with metallic reflections. Above the iyes there is a large white streak, and a patch of the ame colour upon the auricular feathers, both of a mre and shining tint, rendered more conspicuous rom the contrast of the surrounding parts. The •elly and vent are deep black. The back and rump re of a dull brown, with irregular wavy bands of a aler tint. The wing-coverts and secondaries are of brilliant blue, each tipped with a band of velvety lack. The tail, very much rounded, is brown, larked with numerous minute spots of ochraceous rhite ; it has, near the tip, on each side of the shaft, 160 CRESTED FOLYPLECTRON. a large ocellated oval spot, of a very brilliant and me» tallic green. These are surrounded with two circles, the first black, the next of a clear brown ; and to- ward the end of each feather there is a bar of black, which, at the very tip, is succeeded by a narrow band of white. The legs, like the others, are armed with two spurs. The female has not been yet discovered ; and it may be remarked, that this species is by far the rarest in ornithological collections. PLATK VI f Thibet. 161 THE THIBETIAN POLYPLECTRON. Polyplectron Tibetanus — GMELIN. PLATE VI. Pavo Tibetanus, Linn. Gmel. ii. 731. — Peacock Pheasant, Edwards — Eperonnier chinquis, Polyplectron chinquis, Temminck, Planches Coloriees, 539. Male. THIS is another very beautiful species of Poly- plectron, inhabiting, it is believed, the mountainous chain which separates Hindostan from Thibet, whence they are procured, and reared in the menageries of the wealthy Chinese. It is easily domesticated, aiid might be made to breed in confinement ; the bin1' from which Temminck took his drawing and descrip- tion having lived for five or six years in an aviary at the Hague. The entire length of the Thibetian Polyplectron is 22 inches, the form rather light and elegant. It is without a crest ; but the small feathers of the crown are turned forward, and appear in an irregular or disarranged state ; they are of a greyish-brown. The throat is whitish. The feathers of the neck, the breast, and belly, are of a dull brown, crossed with transverse undulated bands of blackish-brown. The back, rump, and coverts of the tail, are of a clear brown, spotted, and transversely undulated with 162 THIBETIAN POLYPLECTRON. greyish-white. The quills are brown, marked wit! greyish. The other feathers composing the wing are generally of a yellowish-grey tint, sprinkle with little bands of blackish -brown, and having the extremity of each a large round eyed spot, brilliant blue, with purple and opaline reflections. These are surrounded with a circle of deep black, which is again encircled with a ring of yellowish- white. The feathers composing the tail are of a dull brown, sprinkled with small spots of ochraceous yellow. Upon each of the twenty-two true tail-fea- thers, at about an inch and a half from the tip, and on those which have been called the upper range, at one inch from the tip, there are two oval spots, se- parated only by the shaft. They, like those upon the wing, have the double circles of deep black and yellowish-white, and are clouded with the same purple and blue reflections, but which scarcely equal the others in brilliancy. The female is said by Temminck to differ only in the lesser brilliancy of the eyed spots, in having a shorter tail, and in the want of spurs. In the young, the plumage is of an earthy grey, marked with large brown spots and bands ; at the first month the plum- age becomes more irregular, and the space upon the wings and tail, where the spots are to appear, are seen, they are still deprived of their lustre, and there is no trace of the pale circle. At the third moult the plumage of these beautiful birds attains its per- fection and brilliancy. 163 LONG-TAILED POLTPLECTRON. Polyplectron chalcurum — TEMMINC K. PLATE VII. Eperonmer chalcure, Polyplectron chalcurum, Temminck^ Planches Coloriees, 519. THIS bird differs from its congeners in wanting the oceDated spots on the various parts of the plumage, which is also entirely of a more sombre shade, and in the form of the tail, which becomes lengthened and runs into the form of that of Argus. Temminck is the only ornithologist who has described and figur- ed it, and the specimen in the Parisian Museum, which served for the copy, he tells us, was unique. The head, neck, breast, belly, and wings, are of an umber brown ; the back, greater coverts, and scapu- lars are of a reddish umber, having numerous waves or crosses of black ; the tail, as we mentioned, is much longer than in any of the others, and has not the two ranges, as it were, of feathers, is brown, with green and violet reflections, and is mottled over with irregular spots of black. Each tarsus is armed with two sharp spurs. The total length of the spe~ 164 LONG-TAILED POLYPLECTRON. cimen was about eighteen inches, and was received from the island of Sumatra. Two additional species are figured by Mr Gray, in his Illustrations of Indian Zoology, but without de- scriptions. These figures are correct copies from the drawings collected by General Hardwick, and are the work of native artists. The first, Mr Gray has dedicated to the General, Polyplectron Hard wickii. It is nearly allied to the P. bicalcaratum. The ground colour of the plumage is ochrey yellow, with black spots and waves, the ocellated spots are surrounded with a black and yellow ring, and the head is furnished with a slightly bending forward greenish crest. Two of the dorsal feafhers from each bird are also given ; the distinctions are, that of P. Hardwickii has a yellowish ground, with irregular black spots, that of P. bicalcaratum, darkish grey, with pale yellow spots. The other bird is named P. lineatum, apparently from a narrow pale line along the shaft of the fea- thers, particularly conspicuous on the rump. This, however, appears to me to be the young of some other species ; there are no spurs on the tarsi, and the description which Temminck gives of the young state of P. ocellatum, is near to the plumage of this bird. Our next illustration represents the genus Ar- gus of Temminck, containing a single species, which &&&US &I&ANTEUS. ISTative of Bata^vio.. THE ARGUS PHEASANT, OR GfC&NTIC ARGUS. Argut giganteus. — TEMMINCK. PLATE VIII. Argus or Luen, Philosophical Transactions, 55, p. 88. — L'Ar- gas ou Luen, Euffon — Argus Pheasant, Phasianus Argus, Latham's General History, viii. p. 206. — L'Argus, Argus giganteus, Temminck, Pigeons et Gallinaces, ii. 41)^ Synopsis, iii, 679. THIS superb bird presents a very singular form among the Gallinaceous order, one which has puzzled most ornithologists into what genus it was to be placed, until Temminck thought of forming one to contain itself. It is chiefly remarkable for the super- abundant development of its plumage, particularly that of the wings ; while its colours, though possess- ing little of the brilliant splendour of those which we have past, by a union of chaste tints and harmo- nious blending, produce an effect at once unique, striking, and pleasing. The descriptions and figures were long imperfect, ^y reason of the skins being transmitted to Eu- •ope in a mutilated state, the head and feet being )ften wanting, and the wings only being sent. It ffas described in the Philosophical Transactions, and 166 THE ARGUS PHEASANT, OR GIGANTIC ARGUS. also in those of Batavia, by the Baron Cuvier, but from imperfect specimens. Dr Latham collects the information of his predecessors, and that afforded to him by Dr Buchanan, and his figure of the Malay Peacock, evidently this bird, is taken from General Hardwick's drawings ; the description in Sonnini's edition of Buffon is extracted from the Philosophi- cal Transactions. M. Temminck appears to have been the first to have described this bird, from a se- ries of specimens received from Batavia, where, with some other birds of splendid plumage, they form an article of commerce, and are exported as ornaments to different parts of dress, screens, or drapery. It is a native of Sumatra, probably some others of the Indian islands, but principally of the peninsula of Malacca ; and although said, generally by ornitholo- gical writers, to inhabit China and Chinese Tartary, there exists no proof of specimens having been brought from thence. In size the Argus is not larger than an ordi- nary fowl, but the length to the end of the two long tail feathers, is five feet three inches, these last be- ing of themselves three feet eight inches. It is im- possible to convey any idea of the markings and blending of the shades on many parts of this bird, and the following description will serve as only an indication of the colours. The throat, the anterior part of the neck, and the cheeks, are naked, or nearly so, having only a few black hairs dispersed over them. The head and back of the neck are covered with THE ARGUS PHEASANT, OR GIGANTIC ARGUS. 167 ghort velvety feathers. The lower part of the neck, breast, belly, and thighs, are reddish brown, each feather regularly spotted with dull yellow and jlack ; the upper part of the back, and lesser wing coverts, are covered with large black spots, sepa- rated by a narrow line of an ochreous tint ; the up- per tail covers are of a clear ochreous yellow, with brown spots ; the longest of a paler tint, with the spots thicker than upon the back, and of a reddish brown in the centre. The tail is of a deep chestnut, sprinkled with white spots, surrounded with a black ring. The wings, of which the secondaries are three times the length of the quills, being about two feet ten inches long, from their unwieldy size, almost en- tirely deprive the bird of flight, but greatly accele- rate its pace when running, and, acting as powerful sails, furnish it with a mode, of transportation or escape, possessing great fleetness. The power of flying, however, adds M. Temminck, is not altoge- ther denied to it; it sometimes rises from the ground, but the flight is always heavy, and kept up only for a short way, and upon these organs, and particularly upon the secondaries, is lavished the greater part of the beautiful adornment. When at rest, or not ex- cited, these spots are hardly visible, but when in the presence of his females, the wings are expanded and trailed upon the ground, displaying their beauties as the peacock exhibits his train, or the turkey his tail. At this time the tail is comparatively spread, and is raised erect. When it rests, it is carried in a line 168 THE ARGUS PHEASANT, OR GIGANTIC ARGUS. trk- with the body, and with the two plumes folded gether. The young males possess none of the varied ma ings just now attempted to be described. They are of a uniform dull brown, spotted and irregularly blotched, reddish-yellow, brown, and black. After the first moult, there is still no appearance of the ocellated spots. The shafts of the feathers of the wings are black, the quills are of a dull brown, clouded with a line on the inner webs, and marked towards the tip with black and brown spots ; the secondaries are of a uniform brown on the inner webs, but the outer ones have a ground of brownish-yellow, with black wavy bands, and the part where the ocellated spots are to appear are marked with black crescents surrounded with chestnut. After the second moult, all the colours of the adult acquire a regular distri- bution ; after the third, they are still better defined, the showy spots are small, of an irregular form, and much less numerous than in the adults ; and it is not until after the fourth moult, that the shades acquire their perfect brilliancy, and the markings their re- gularity *. The female is still less known than the male. Among the birds sent from abroad, those of unob- trusive plumage are seldom included, and when commerce is the object, even a reiterated request fails in procuring the wished for specimens. With thirty males, Tern mi tick thought himself fortunate * Temminck. THE ARGUS PHEASANT, OR GIGANTIC ARGUS. 169 in procuring two females. Like the male, the head and forepart of the neck is naked, a thick short down covers the top of the head, stretching down upon the neck, where it gradually lengthens, and as- sumes the form of feathers : these parts are of a brownish grey. The lower part of the neck, breast, and upper parts of the back, are of a chestnut red ; the lower part of the back, rump, lesser wing coverts, and those of the tail, have, upon a yellowish-brown ground, numerous black transverse bands, some large, arid others narrow in the form of zigzags ; the tail, which has no long feathers, as in the male, folds to- gether, and forms an angle like that of a hen ; it is of a brownish chestnut, varied with spots and black bands, but the most remarkable difference is in the secondaries ; in the male we found them to be two feet ten inches long, in this sex they are only about thirteen inches, and possess neither the development in breadth, nor the ocellated spots so conspicuous in the other. They are of a blackish brown, marked with small and irregular bands of ochrey yellow. The habits of this singular bird are yet a point of much interest in Ornithology. They are said not to thrive well in a state of confinement, and we be- lieve have never been brought alive to this country Their incubation and breeding are equally unknown. 170 GENUS GALLUS, — BRISSOX. Modern ornithologists have properly separated the birds generally known under the title of Cocks, from the Pheasants, with which they were formerly united, and have restored to them Brisson's more an- cient title of Gallus. Thus restricted, they are dis- tinguished from the pheasants, by the crown of the head being naked, and the skin being raised into a fleshy elongation, called the comb, assuming different forms in different species, and by the base of the lower mandibles having fleshy lobes or wattles, by the tail being generally carried erect, composed of two planes folded together at a sharp angle, and in the males having the centre feathers elongated, and falling gracefully over the others. The feathers of the neck, and lower part of the back and tail-co- verts, assume a particular form, and are either long and hackled or truncated ; in either state they are very amply supplied. They are all natives of India and her islands, frequenting the forest and jungle. They are polygamous, and very pugnacious regarding their females, proclaiming their victory and prowess with a loud and piercing voice. The plumage of the males is brilliant, of the female dull and unobtrusive, and there is often a considerable disparity in size. THE GIGANTIC COCK. 171 It is from these birds that we are indebted for the domestic poultry of our farm-yards. Many native species are at the present time known, and we con- sider it very difficult to determine which is the di- rect origin of our reclaimed fowls. They may have reached their present state from a mixture of many, but with Temminck we are inclined to give the pre- ference to two species, the Gallus giganteus and Bankiva, both natives of Java, on account of the do- mestic females bearing the greatest resemblance to those in a wild state, by the similarity of the form and structure of the feathers, and by the males of those possessing the greatest development of como and wattles. The first of these birds may be now described : GIGANTIC COCK. Gallus giganteuS) — TEMMINCK. The description of M. Temminck is founded up- on the notices which have been given by Dampier and Marsden, the only portion of the bird which he had seen being the leg and foot, of which he gives a plate in his Natural History of Gallinaceous Birds. There is a specimen in the Edinburgh Museum said to be wild from Sumatra, of a large size, and to which, in several particulars, the large breed of cocks in this country bear considerable resemblance, par- ticularly in the comb, which extends backwards in a 172 THE GIGANTIC COCK. The line with the eyes, and is thick, slightly raised, upon the top rounded, and as it were cut off. throat is bare, and there are two wattles from the under mandibles of comparatively small size. The head, neck, and upper part of the back is covered with pale golden-reddish hackles, which spring also slightly before the bare space of the throat. The centre of the back and lesser wing-coverts are deep chestnut, the feathers with the webs disunited, the hackles covering the rump, and base of the tail pale reddish-yellow, long and bending down. Tail very ample and entirely of a glossy green. Greater wing- coverts glossy-green, secondaries and quills with outer webs pale reddish-yellow. The whole under parts deep glossy blackish green, with strong reflec- tions, and having the base of the feathers deep chest- nut, which occasionally appears and makes these parts seem mottled and interrupted. The height of this specimen from the ground is about 2 feet '2 to 2 feet 4 inches. The cocks with ample crests upon the head, five toes ; the rumpless cock, and those of very varied co- lours, appear chiefly to have arisen from the various circumstances attending domestication and crossing. The most pleasing of these are specimens with a super- abundant crest and auricular feathers. The crest is composed of narrow hackled feathers, which grow erect from the head, but fall down in graceful curves, and are sometimes so long as to overhang and shadow the eyes. Jn many parts this breed is much culti- THE GIGANTIC COCK. 173 vated, and is esteemed in proportion as the colours of the body and crest can be got most conspicuously contrasted, a black body with white crest, and the reverse, &c. Other fancy breeds are also frequent- ly seen in the Dutch Pencilled Fowl, pure white spotted with black, the Siberian Fowl, having long tufts of feathers springing from the lower jaws and hanging down, arid the Barbary Fowl, of a pale dun colour, and having the feathers of the neck very am- ple and spotted with black. A more singular anomaly occurs in those with five toes, generally called Dork- ing Fowls from being found and bred in most abun- dance in the neighbourhood of Dorking in Surry. This race is easily continued, and seems analogous either to the six-fingered or six-toed individuals of man- kind, or to the dogs with the additional claws. They are much esteemed, are generally pure white, and grow to a large size ; Dr Latham records one which weighed almost fourteen pounds. A still more ano- malous race occurs perhaps in those without a tail, the Rumpless or Persian Cock, but we have also races analogous to them in the tailless races of dogs and cats. There are three races of cocks, however, whose claim to actual distinction of species is not very well or satisfactorily ascertained, the G. morio, having the periosteum of the bones black, and the comb, wattles, and skin of a dull purple. It has received the name of Negro and Blackamoor Cock, but I believe is scarcely to be seen in the poultry-yards of this J74 THE GIGANTIC COCK. country. The other two varieties are more frequently seen, and are known as the Silky Cock (G. lanatus), and the Friesland Cock (G. crispus). The first, Tern* ininck is inclined to consider distinct. It is found in Japan and China, and is sold to Europeans as a rarity. In this country it crosses easily with the white domestic poultry, and a breed having the feathers less disunited and silky is the consequence. It is a curious fact, that the periosteum and skin of this bird are of the same dark colour with those of the G. morio, while the flesh is remarkably white. The size is rather small, the plumage of the purest white, the feathers having the webs disunited are of a silky appearance and feel, and the comb and wattles are of a laky purple. The Friesland or Crested Cock lias all the feathers as it were turned the wrong way; they stand nearly at right angles with the body. The general colour of the plumage is white, but it is often seen varied like the other domestic races. It also occurs in a domesticated state in Java and Su- matra, but Tcmminck thinks it a distinct species, and peculiar to some parts of the Indian islands yet unexplored. We, however, think this less pro- bable, than that the two previously mentioned are separate in their origin, as we meet with analogous variations in the hair of animals, which we know to belong to one race. It is from a better known species that the race of Bantams appears to have sprung ; the G. Bankiva of Temminck, which we have represented in the vig- THE BANKIVA COCK. 175 nette accompanying this volume. It will stand as tU BANKIVA COCK. Gallus bankiva — TEMMINCK. (See Vignette Title-page.) Coq et Poule Bankiva, Temminck, Pigeons et Gallinacb, '::,. p. 86 Gallus Bankiva, and Ayara utan or Brooga, Transactions of Linnean Society, xiii. p. 135. and 319. — Javan Cock, Latham, General History, vol. viii. p. 166—- 1 Gallus Bankiva, Illustrations of Ornithology, plate 150. Many Bantams so nearly resemble this bird, that there would be great difficulty in making a distinc- tion. Around the eyes and the throat is bare, the comb is ample, with an irregular outline, and narrow lengthened lobes arise from the crown, and two wattles spring from the lower mandible. The head, back, and sides of the neck surrounding the bare skin up- , on the throat and the rump, are covered with long hackles of a clear and brilliant golden-orange. Be- ! low the hackles the upper part of the back is bluish- black, and the centre with the lesser wing-coverts are of a rich deep chestnut, the webs of the feathers ! quite disunited. The greater coverts are steel-blue, the secondaries of the same colour, with a broad irargin of chestnut, the quills brownish-black, edged f with pale reddish-yellow. The tail is black, with rich green and blue reflections, the whole under parti are black. 1 76 THE BANKIVA COCK. .thro* There is another bird, of which we have seen 1 or four specimens, very closely allied to this, hut cer- tainly distinct. The specimens alluded to were all from the continent of India. In size they were ra- ther larger than what we consider the true G. ban- kiva. The following is a description of one of them : — Comb large, dentated upon its frontal margin, an oval lengthened wattle at the base of each lower man- dible, the cheeks, throat, base, and fore part of the neck terminating in a point bare of feathers. Crown of the head surrounding the comb yellowish-brown, changing into golden ochraceous-yellow, the colour of the exterior margin of the hackles, and most pre- dominating. These cover the whole back and sides of the neck. Each hackle has a black centre, and is rather abruptly as it were worn off at the tip. The fore part of the neck is of a steel-blue surrounding the naked skin, the feathers rounded and solid. Un- der this the breast, belly, and lower part of the back is covered with hackles of a clear reddish-yellow on the outer margins, the centres of a chestnut-brown, having the same form at the tip with those of the neck, and becoming broader as they reach the lower part of the body. On the shoulders the margins of the small feathers are of a pale golden -yellow, the centres chestnut-brown, edged on each side with black. As they approach the long hanging secon- daries the margins become darker, and the centres only chestnut, nearly similar to those on the breast Ontl THE BANKIVA COCK. 177 the lower part of the back, rump, and part of the tail-coverts, the hackles are broad, the centres solid deep black, glossed with green, steel-blue, and pur- ple, none of them very lengthened or pendulous. The quills and secondaries black, glossed with steel- blue, the greater coverts chestnut on the outer webs. Belly and vent black. Tail nearly like that of the , common fowl, perhaps a little more horizontal, centre feather longest, curved and bending out. The larger , tail-coverts steel-blue, broad, curved, and bending , outwards. To this we refer the Gallus Turcicus of Brisson, . or Cock of Turkey. The true Bantams, so called . from the name of the town in Java, are distin- , guished by the plumed legs, a variation incident on- ly to cultivation and domestication. A still more dwarf race is known under the title of the Gallus , pumilo ; this is extremely diminutive, but nearly of the same colours, and is much cultivated among cock-fanciers. There is a club in the vicinity of London who compete and give prizes to those who succeed in producing the smallest breed. These seem to be the principal cultivated races of these useful birds. Innumerable crosses are, how- ever, made according to the taste of fanciers, re- markable both for their beauty and deformity. The origin of them all, and the claim of some to distinc- tion, is however still in a certain obscurity, and will probably continue so. 178 THE BANKIVA COCK. The cock in some of its varieties was known at very early period, but we have no traces how it was introduced to Greece or Southern Europe. It made a figure at the public shows of the Greeks and Ro- mans, who have preserved records of it upon their coinage, and in their mythology have dedicated it to Apollo, Mercury, ^Esculapius and Mars. At the Roman banquets it was also for a while a prominent dish ; the finest were fattened in the Island of Delos, whose inhabitants were proud of their success in feeding, and that island, with Rhodes, also produced the best and boldest at the public fights. Meal, milk, and darkness, were said to be the great secrets of the art ; Pascitur et dulci facilis gallina farina, Pascitur et tenebris, ingeniosa gula est. Mart. xiii. 62. and the modern art of cramming, with all its cruel- ties, was also perhaps resorted to ; for a law was af- terwards made, that no one should bring to his table more than one fowl, and that this should neither be crammed nor forcibly fattened. In later days a certain superstition is attached to the cock and the various periods at which he crows ; his crowing dispels all spirits, whether good or evil — Whether in sea or fire, in earth or air. The ghost in Hamlet " faded at the crowing of the cock," and the idea has ever been a favourite one with poets and romancers, and is frequently called THE BANKIVA COCK. 1 79 to assist in getting rid of the many mysterious forms which the embellishment of their story required. During the season of the Welsh ceremony of the plygan or cock-crowing, the cock was supposed to exert this power through the night to the utmost ex- tent, an old opinion finely described by Shakspeare : Some say that ever against that season comes Wherein our Saviour's birth is celebrated, The bird of dawning singeth all night long ; And then, they say, no spirit walks abroad ; The nights are wholesome ; then no planets strike ; No fairy takes ; nor witch has power to charm, So hallowed and so gracious is the time. But the most disgraceful purpose of luxury, fa- shionable amusement, or whatever it may be termed, to which this noble bird has been subjected, is that of cock-fighting. It is generally allowed to have been a Grecian institution, and at its commencement to have been held in the estimation of a rite entirely religious and political. By degrees its serious cha- racter became lessened, and it was practised with all its cruelties, and the zest heightened by the gam- bling propensities of its greatest supporters. It is supposed to have been introduced to this country in the time of the Csesars, and became a royal pastime. In India it has also been long known, and perhaps carried to a greater extent than among any other people, whole fortunes and properties being staked, and even wives and children risked, upon the event of the contest. In England, with what was called " throwing at cocks," it formed a prominent part in 180 THE BANKIVA COCK. the amusements of Shrove-Tuesday, till so late as ] the commencement of 1700. It was permitted in the ! public schools as an amusement to the boys, the preceptor, in some instances, being obliged to furnish the victims, which served to lessen the expense of these institutions, by collecting a certain rent or due for each cock which was produced ; and in a parish in the north of Scotland, according to the last Statisti- cal Account, the schoolmaster's perquisites were the cock-fighting dues, equal to one quarter's payment of each scholar. Throwing at cocks is perhaps less known. The following description is given by Brand, in his inte- resting popular antiquities : — " The owner of the cock trains his bird for some time before Shrove- Tuesday, and throws a stick at him himself, in order to prepare him for the fatal day, by accustoming him to watch the threatened danger, and, by springing aside, to avoid the fatal blow. He holds the poor victim on the spot marked out by a cord fixed to his leg, at a distance of nine or ten yards, so as to be out of the way of the stick himself. Another spot is marked, at the distance of twenty-two yards, for the person who throws to stand upon. He has three shys or throws for twopence, and wins the cock if he can knock him down, and run up and catch him before the bird recovers his legs. In 1680 this cus- tom was sanctioned in the environs of London, and the proceeds applied to the poor-rates." A hen was also sometimes made use of in another THE BANKIVA COCK. 181 noisy and ridiculous pastime of this period — " Thresh- ing the Hen." At Shrovetide to shroving go thresh the fat hen, If blindfold can kill him, then give it thy men. Tusser. " The Hen," says Brand, " was hung at a fellow's back, who has also some horse bells about him ; the rest of the fellows are blinded, and have boughs in their hands, with which they chase this fellow with his hen about some large court or small enclosure, the fellow with his hen and bells shifting as well as he can, they follow the sound, and sometimes hit him and his hen ; at other times, if he can get be- hind one of them, they thrash one another right fa- vourably. When the hen was killed, it was boiled with bacon, and store of pancakes and fritters are made." For economical purposes there is no bird used to the same extent. Among all nations it is most ex- tensively reared, and we believe is one of the only instances where artificial means have been attempted with success. The Egyptians have practised this manner of rearing poultry with the greatest nicety, and in the edifices heated by flues, .and constructed for this purpose only, from 40,000 to 50,000 chickens could be hatched at once. This was attempted to be introduced into various parts of Europe by Reaumur, but with only partial success, and within these few years an establishment to a considerable extent was tried in London. The temperature of 182 THE BANKIVA COCK. modern Europe is, however, too variable, and the greatest delicacy in the management of the heat is necessary. Among the birds belonging to this group not so generally known, and remarkable for the beauty of their plumage, we may first mention &AI.LTJS U-: NK.rs. i Tl,e yronzecl Cock) ITattre of Stmaatra.. 188 THE BRONZED COCK. Callus ceneus — CUVIER. PLATE IX. Coq bronzd ; Gallus seneus, Temminck, Planches Colorizes, p. 374. Male. THIS beautiful bird seems first to have been fi- gured in the Planches Coloriees from a single speci- men sent from the interior of Sumatra by M. Diard, It is rather larger than the Bankiva cock. The comb is very large, and with an unbroken edge. The cheeks and throat are bare, and from the base of each lower mandible there is a small thick wattle ; the whole of these parts are bright red. The fea- thers of the head, neck, and upper part of the back, are slightly lengthened, but do not take the usual long hackle shape, and are of a metallic green, with brilliant reflections. The plumes are of deep and rich purple, and are edged with a broad border of pale lake. The tail is also purple, with bright me- tallic green reflections. The throat, breast, and the whole under parts, are of a deep black, shaded curple, and in some lights with a greenish tinge. Our next Plate represents 184 THE FORK-TAILED COCK. Callus furcatus — TEMMINP.K. PLATE X. Coq ayam-alas ; Gallus furcatus, Temminck, Histolre Na- turelle des Gallinaces, ii. p. 261 — PL Coloriees,pl. 483 — Gallus Javonicus, Horsfield. THIS curious Cock was first described by M.Tem- minck in 1813. It is nearly two feet in length to the extremity of the tail. The cheeks are bare, the head furnished with a simple entire comb, and the throat with a single large wattle springing from the centre : they are all bright red. The head, neck, and upper part of the back, are remarkable, from the short and rounded form of the feathers : the centre of these feathers is of a deep metallic blue, which shades towards the edges to a golden-green, and at the extremities they are finished with a narrow band of veiy deep black. The feathers of the lower part of the back and tail-coverts lengthened as usual, are of a deep black in the centre, and are bordered with a narrow stripe of pale yellow : those forming the wing-coverts are of the same form, but the pale narrow border is of a rich orange-red : the whole under parts are deep black. The tail is said to be carried more in a line with the body than usual, and UNIVERSITY THE FORK- TAILED COCK. 185 to have a slightly forked form : the large hanging feathers are of a rich metallic green, tinged with steel-blue. The bill, legs, and feet, are yellow. The hen has a circle round the eyes only, naked and of a livid tint : the head and back part of the neck are brown, and above each eye there is a red- dish streak : the back and wing-coverts are of a dull green, with golden reflections, each feather having a greyish-brown margin : the greater coverts and se- condaries are black, with greenish reflections, waved transversely with yellowish-brown, and having the tips entirely of that colour; the tail and wings brown, the feathers of the former edged with pale reddish, the whole of the under parts are grey, the tips of the feathers on the breast tipped with a deeper tint ; the feet and legs are brown. This bird is said to be very abundant in Java, and may be often seen during the day upon the edges of the woods and jungles, but possesses the same wary disposition of its congeners and the pheasants, and upon the least alarm runs for cover. Tem- minck observes that they are not kept in a domestic state, but that they occasionally breed with the tame hens — a curious fact, and showing the uncertainty with which the true origin is clouded. The cry may be expressed, he says, by the syllables co-crek. The last that we shall here notice, is still more remarkable in the form of the neck and back fea- thers, which are completely separated in their form and colour from all the others. It is 186 SONNERAT'S WILD COCK. Callus Sonneratii. — TEMMINCK. PLATE XI. MALE.— XII. FEMALE. Coq sauvage, Sonnerafs India, ii. pis. 94. & 95 — Phasianus Gallus, Lath. Index Ornithologicus.—~Coci et Poule Son- nerat, Temminck, Pigeons et Gallinacees, ii. p. 246.— Planches Coloriees, pis. 232, 233 — Sonnerat's Wild Cock, Latham's General History r, vol. viii. p. 181. SONNERAT'S Cock has been dedicated by M. Temminck to its discoverer. The first notice we find of it which can be trusted, is in the Voyage to India by that traveller, under the title of Wild Cock, and asserting it as the probable stock from which all our domestic races have arisen. The very great dif- ference of the structure of the plumage, however, renders this most improbable ; and none of the do- mesticated races in India bear the least resemblance to it. It is a native of the continent of India, inha- biting the higher wooded districts, particularly In- dostan, where, among English sportsmen, it receives the name of Jungle Fowl ; and specimens of it, next to the Bankiva cock, are much the most frequent in collections in this country. In size, it is nearly equal to an ordinary domestic fowl, the proportions 1'LATK M ('•AI.U'S SONNERATI SONNERAT'S WILD COCK. 187 rather more slender and graceful : the comb is and with an unequal margin ; and double wattles hang from the base of the under mandibles. But the most singular part in the plumage is in the form of the shaft in all the long hackled feathers : those of the neck, wing and tail coverts have a dark greyish ground, but the shafts are of a bright golden orange, and in the centre and at the tip dilate into a flat horny plate, similar to what is seen in the wings and tail of the Bohemian Wax-wing. They will, however, be bet- ter understood by the accompanying representations of their form. Their appearance is both singular and beautiful. The centre of the back, the throat, breast, belly, and thighs, are of a deep and rich grey, ha- ving the shafts and edges of a paler tint. The tail is of a rich and deep green : the feathers which im- mediately succeed the long hackles of a rich purple, edged with a pale yellow, and those immediately succeeding of a golden-green, edged with grey, the 188 SONNERAT'S WILD COCK. whole with very brilliant metallic reflections. The bill, legs, and feet, are yellow. The hen is about a third less than the cock, with- out comb or wattles. The plumage has no trace of the horny structure adorning the other sex. The up- per parts of it are of a uniform brown : the feathers on the neck edged with a dark margin, upon the back and wing-coverts with a pale streak along the shaft, and on the wings, tail coverts and tail, waved and mottled with darker markings. The throat and fore part of the neck is white, and on the rest of the lower parts each feather is of a greyish-white, edged with dark brown ; towards the vent the brown pre- dominates. The legs and feet are bluish-grey. Dr Latham observes that this species is by far the boldest and strongest in proportion to its size, and in Indostan is anxiously sought after by the cock- fighters, seldom failing to secure the victory over the larger game cocks. We shall now proceed to the Pheasants, forming the GENUS PHASIANUS, Auctorum. THE RING-NECKED PHEASANT. Phasianus torquatus. — TEMMINCK. PLATE XIII. Faisan a collier ; Phasianus torquatus, Temminck, Pigeons et Gallinacees, ii. p. 327. WITH this bird we enter the genus Phasianus, as it is now restricted by modern ornithologists. Formerly the birds which we have just left were in- cluded in it, and another group which we shall reach after having described a few of the more interesting and typical forms of that now before us. The Pheasants may generally be characterized by having the bill rather strong, the upper mandible convex, and naked at the base : the nostrils are la- teral, and covered with a cartilaginous scale. The head is clothed with feathers, but the region of the eyes, for a considerable space, is covered with a naked verrucose skin, generally of a bright vermi- lion. The wings are short, but firm and compact. The tail is remarkably long, generally wedge-shaped. The feet have the anterior toes united by a mem- 190 RING-NECKED PHEASANT. brane to the first joint. The hind toe is articulati upon the tarsus, which, in the males, is furnished with a strong conical sharp spur. The plumage < the male is generally of the most brilliant tints. In their habits, the Pheasants exhibit all the character of the rasorial birds : they live on fruits and roots, and the larger seeds, are remarkably active upon ground ; and though their short and concave wings prevent them from taking a long and sustained flight, their power is sufficient to cany them away from ordinary dangers ; while in the form of the tail and rump feathers, or upper tail-coverts, we find the same fulness which we have seen to be so extraordinarily developed in the peacock, turkey, and cocks. For our first illustration, and as typical of this group, we have selected the Common Pheasant, fa- miliar to every one, and universally admired, for the richness and beauty of his plumage. It is now generally admitted that the Pheasant was originally introduced into Europe from the banks of the Pha- sis *, a river in Chalchis in Asia Minor. The Greeks, in the ascent of the stream, were attracted by their beauty ; and the bird being so easily domesticated, a valuable addition to the luxury of themselves and the Romans was soon secured, and rapidly extended itself over the southern countries of Europe. They appeared at the expensive and superabundant repasts of the ancients, and for a time bore the palm for no- * Now the Rioni. RING-NECKED PHEASANT. 191 relty ; and Heliogobalus in his ostentation is said to have fed the lions of his menagerie with them. The Pheasant may be said to have been originally re- stricted to the Asiatic continent, extending over the greater part of it, and reaching to China and the confines of Tartary. Now, however, it is much i more extended, and its facility of domestication, and i hardy constitution, suit it for almost every country. It is even abundant in Siberia, where the inhabitants adorn their caps with its plume ; and one of the Governors of St Helena succeeded in almost natu- ralizing it to the more barren soil of that island. In the greater part of Europe it is completely na- turalized ; and we have heard of its introduction to North America, where it will certainly thrive. We are not aware of any similar attempt having been made in either Africa or New Holland. In the latter we should have little doubt of its success; but the climate of Africa we should consider as one of the most unpropitious for its establishment. We are in greater uncertainty of the time of its intro- i duction into Great Britain than of its original dis- • covery. They are mentioned in Echard's History of England as worth only 4d. in 1299. Two hun- dred made part of the great feast of Archbishop Neville, about the middle of 1 400 ; and in the re- gulations of the fifth Earl of Northumberland, begun in 1512, we find their value increased to 16^d. each. Upon the Scottish border and high Cheviot range 192 RING-NECKED PHEASANT. they must have been early abundant ; for in the < ballad of the Field of Otterbourne, we have The roo full rekeles there sche rinnes, To make the game and glee ; The Fawkon and the Fesaunt both, Among the haltes on hee. The markings and varying and splendid hues < the plumage of the male Pheasant are so well knov and have been so often celebrated, that any detaili description will be unnecessary. Pope's poetical de- scription is extensively known : that of another, per- haps less frequently quoted, will give some idea of his splendid appearance : Splendid his form, his eyes of flaming gold Two fiery rings of living scarlet hold; His arching neck a varying beauty shows, Now rich with azure, now with emerald glows ; His swelling breast with glossy purple shines, Chestnut his back, and waved with ebon lines, To his broad wings gay hues their radiance lend, His mail-clad legs two knightly spurs defend. In this country we have, however, Pheasants which exhibit a marked difference in the want or presence of the pure and conspicuous white ring which en- circles the neck. These, by sportsmen, and many ornithologists, have been considered as varieties on- ly ; while Temminck, who compared native spe- cimens of each, thinks them completely distinct. Out of India they breed freely together, and it is im- RING-NECKED PHEASANT. 193 possible to decide the question from any series which could be procured from the preserves of this coun- try ; and we possess Indian specimens of the ringed bird only. We shall therefore mention the reasons for separating them which the above-mentioned na- turalist has pointed out, stating, at the same time, that we consider his opinion to be correct, and that the differences evidently appear more marked than in many allied birds which have universally been acknowledged distinct. The ringed pheasant chiefly inhabits the forests of China, where the common species is also abundant, but in this natural state they never breed together. The eggs of the ringed bird also differ : they are of a pale bluish-green, marked with small blotches of a deeper tint ; while those of the common pheasant are of an olive white *, and without any spots. The ringed pheasant in its wild state, is always of a lesser size, the extreme length never exceeding two feet five inches, and the tail itself is much shorter in pro- portion to the body. The head is of a whitish fawn colour, tinted with bluish-green ; and above each eye there are two white lines, forming a sort of eyebrow. The markings on the back are different and smaller, and the rump feathers shew the same peculiar tint which the mixture of fawn and greenish-blue ex- hibits ; and, lastly, the white ring broadest upon the sides of the neck, is a mark which never can be mis- * This may be seen in any part where the two breeds ex- ist together. N 194 RING-NECKED PHEASANT. taken. The female also differs in her lesser size, and comparative length of the tail. The ground colour of the plumage is brown. There are no dark spots upon the breast, and the barring of the tail is very distinctly marked ; but what Temminck has observed to be tbe principal distinction in the female, is a little band of thick and black feathers, which runs a short way under each eye, and which he thinks is wanting in the other. The common pheasant does not much differ in its markings from those of the mixed breed we are ac- customed to see, except in the entire want of the ring, and the peculiar tint upon the head and rump, but it is longer by five or six inches than the other, extending to three feet. Of the habits of these birds in a natural state, we know little in reality, but have no reason to doubt their similarity to those exhibited in our own coun- try ; and the deep matted jungles of India, particu- larly where water abounds, must be their favourite resort. In their naturalized state, woods with a thick undergrowth of brush, brambles, long grass, &c. and interspersed with open glades, which some little stream refreshes, and the sun enlivens, are their de- light during the day, and whence they run morning and evening to the open skirts, where some favourite food abounds. It is in their way to such feeding ground, that they are so easily secured by unqua- lified persons, for, never taking flight unless dis- turbed, they nui and thread their way through these RING-NECKED PHEASANT. 195 tangled brakes, and leave passages which are easily distinguished by the practised eye of the poacher. During the winter months the pheasant goes regu- larly to roost, and the abundance of a preserve may easily be ascertained about twilight, by the noise which the males make in flying up to their perch. During summer, however, and when moulting, they do not tree, but squat among the long grass and cover, of- fering themselves in this way an easy prey to another class of enemies, polecats, foxes, &c. When pheasants are numerous, Mr Selby observes, " the males are in general found associated during the winter, and sepa- rate from the females ; and it is not until the end of March that they allow the approach of the latter without exhibiting signs of displeasure, or at least of indifference. At the above mentioned time, the male assumes an altered appearance ; the scarlet of his cheeks, and around his eyes, acquires additional depth of colour, and he walks with a more measured step, with his wings let down, and with his tail car- ried in a more erect position. Being polygamous, he now takes possession of a certain beat, from whence he drives every male intruder, and commences his crowing, attended with a peculiar clapping of the wings, which answers as the note of invitation to the other sex, as well as of defiance to his own." During summer, the favourite food of the phea- sants are tender shoots of the potato and other plants, and insects with their larvae ; as the au- tumn advances, the ripening grains of all kinds are 196 RING-NECKED PHEASANT. abundant, and the ample store of wild fruits and ber- ries which nature has every where provided, render this their time of feasting. As winter approaches, they are reduced to less various fare, and resort to the fal- lows in search of roots, and to the turnip fields ; and Mr Selby has remarked, that the roots of the bul- bous crowfoot (Ranunculus bulbosus\ and of the garden tulip, are both much sought after. The lat- ter they omit no opportunity of obtaining, and which, by means of the bill and feet, they are almost certain to reach, however deep it may be buried. In extensive preserves, during this season, they are always regu- larly fed, and know the feeding hour and call of the keeper correctly, and by this means they are pre- vented from straying. The most successful and fa- vourite food at these times is peas or grain. In the south of England, the breeding of pheasants for the supply of preserves, is carried on to a great extent, and on this account the bird can almost never be seen except in an artificial state ; for being turned out of the nursing-houses early in the season, and fed and nursed in the covers for the winter's batteau, they are slug- gish and lazy, quite fearless, and can aiford any thing but sport to one accustomed to follow game in their wild and natural haunts. The slaughter at these shooting meetings is sometimes so immense, that the game can scarcely be made use of, and they were formerly much more wanton on the Continent than in England. In perhaps the largest game establishment of RING-NECKED PHEASANT. 197 modern days, and conducted in a most magnificent scale, that of Chantilli, 54,878 head of various game were killed in one year ; and during a pe- riod of thirty-two years, 12,304 is the lowest num- ber that was obtained. In the same course of years the number of pheasants killed was 86,193, averaging nearly 2700 yearly. In Germany, there were some parties scarcely inferior in massacre. A party of ten in Bohemia are said to have killed in two days, with- in a limited extent, above 950 pheasants, besides about 1200 partridges; and in another part of Ger- many, twelve sportsmen, if such a name is applicable to them, killed in one day of fourteen hours, 39,000 head of game, of which pheasants bore a proportion. At the Christmas batteau in England, 800 to 1000 head of game is a frequent daily amount, the greater share of which are hares and pheasants. From these some idea may be formed of the extent to which breeding and turning out is carried. The pheasant is subject to considerable variety of plumage. Like most of the gallinaceous birds, as we have already mentioned, the female assumes the plum- age of the male, and those in this state should be kill- ed or expelled the preserves, as with the livery, they assume a disposition at war with their own race. They vary in being mottled with white, or becoming en- tirely of that colour ; and Temminck is of opinion that in such cases the change is owing to disease in some of their functions, and mentions that persons who have long had the charge of a pheasantry, have 1 98 RING-NECKED PHEASANT. known the white birds resume all their former brilliancy of plumage, after continuing for years in the albino state. There is another very beautiful variety which of late years has become extremely common in Scot- land, and has received the appellation of Bohemian Pheasant. The ground shade of the plumage be- comes of a rich green cream colour, but the head retains its glossy tint, and the black tips and mark- ings on the breast and belly, and back, appear even more conspicuous than in the ordinary state. This state may occur from a modification of the same causes which influence the change in the white va- rieties. The pheasant sometimes also crosses with the do- mestic fowl. Temminck mentions this as requiring great attention to accomplish ; but where poultry is kept upon the borders of a wood abounding with phea- sants, it occasionally happens, and would do so per- haps more frequently, if favourable opportunities oc- curred ; a specimen in our own possession, exhibit- ing all the mixed characters, was procured in a wild state. M. Temminck also records a solitary instance of a mule between the female common pheasant and male golden pheasant, which exhibited a curious but splendid mixture; all his endeavours, how- ever, to procure a second specimen were ineffectual. The common pheasant breeds also freely with the ringed bird, and the offspring is productive. This has been considered by many as a proof that these two birds were identical, but in the whole of this order, RING-NECKED PHEASANT. 199 and its corresponding one among quadrupeds, this law- has a much more extended modification, and can scarcely be taken as a criterion except in very oppo- site instances. We shall now examine another very beautiful pheasant, very much allied in form to that we have now been describing. It is 200 DIARD'S PHEASANT. Phasianus versicolor — VIEILLOT. PLATE XIV. MALE.—XV. FEMALE. Le Faisan versicolor, Phasianus versicolor, Vieillot^ Gal lerie des Oiseaux, pi. 205 — Temminck, Planches Coloriees. Male, pi. 486. Female, pi. 493. THIS beautiful pheasant was first noticed by M. Diard, who procured a specimen which had been imported to Batavia, and is first figured and de- scribed by M. Vieillot in his Gallery, and since by M. Temminck, who has also added the portrait of the female, both of which have been used for the accom- panying illustrations. It is a native of Japan, fre- quenting the woods, according to Seiboldt, and pos- sessing the manners and habits of the common bird. Diard's pheasant is nearly of the size and form of the common naturalised breed, but the tail is some- what shorter in proportion. The naked space of the cheeks is bright scarlet. The head and upper part of the neck are of a golden green, with violet reflections ; the throat and fore part of the neck of a lively blue ; lower part of the neck, breast, and upper parts of the body, of a deep green, with a DIARD'S PHEASANT. 201 shining lustre. The feathers of the back and scapu- lars have small yellowish white bands upon a ground of rich metallic green, glossed with purple and vio- let, and surrounded with a border of golden yellow. The lower part of the back and rump are grey, clouded with green. The tail coverts blue or green, according as the light falls upon them. The feathers of the tail are of a greyish green, the lateral ones thickly mottled with very small spots ; the four cen- tre ones crossed with bars, largest and broadest to- wards the base. The edges of these feathers are long and disunited, and have on each side one of a greyish purple, almost like a fringe. The feet and legs are reddish. The total length of the bird is about three feet seven or eight inches. The female, Plate XV., about sixteen or seventeen inches in length, M. Temminck observes, so closely re- sembles the common hen pheasant, as scarcely to be .istinguished from her, except by the less size, and the iroportional length of the tail. The upper parts, how- ever, have generally a greener tint, and are of a metal- lic lustre, and the lower parts have a much greater number of black spots and markings. We have given a representation of the female of this bird, with the view of exhibiting the differences of sex among the pheasants ; among all, even the most splendid, the plumage is of a shade of yellowish brown ; the feathers, to a certain extent, following the form of those of the male, and generally barred with black about the tips. BtJII pro 202 THE BARRED-TAILED PHEASANT. Phasianus superbus, — LATHAM. PLATE XVI. Barred-tailed Pheasant, Latham's General History, vol. viii. p. 196 — Phasianus superbus, Faisan superbe, Tem- minck, Pigeons et Gallinaces, ii. 336 — Faisan venere, Pha- sianus veneratus, Temminck, Planches Colorizes, pi. 485. FROM Temminck's own shewing, this is the Pha- sianus superbus of his former work, and of Latham's General History. Why he changes the name to that of veneratus, which was engraved on the accompany- ing plate, before enquiring into the matter, we do not know ; and seeing no reason for it, we have now retained the original one, already introduced into many works of natural history. Dr Latham's original description of this very splendid bird, was taken from one of the drawings of Sir J. Anstruther ; from the writing beneath it in the Persian language, it was called Doom-durour, (long-tail), and was found on the snowy mountains of Surinagur. Temminck's first description, amounted only to that of two of the tail feathers, but having since procured two entire specimens, he has been en- THE BARRED-TAILED PHEASANT. 203 abled to give a figure aiid more detailed account ; the former has now served for the accompanying il- lustration. It appears to be extremely rare in China, and to be brought from the confines of the em- pire to Pekin, where it is kept in the menageries of the most wealthy. Temminck is also of opinion that their exportation is prohibited under a severe penalty. The most remarkable feature in this bird is the extraordinary and disproportional length of the tail. Temminck gives the length of the longest feather as above four feet, while Dr Latham remarks, " Some years since, I had an opportunity of seeing a bundle of thirty or forty of these tail feathers, which were brought from China : I found among them every length from more than seven feet to eighteen inches." The body of the bird is about the size of the Silver Pheasant of our Plate XVIII. A small portion round the eye is bare of feathers, and is red. The head is covered with a cowl of white, surrounded by a narrow band of black, broadest to- wards the ears. Two white collars cover the neck, and are broadest on the fore part ; the first stretches from the base of the bill upon the throat, the second spreads upon the breast. The back of the neck, back, and rump, are covered with feathers, in the form of scales, of a rich and brilliant golden-yellow* and terminated at the extremity by a narrow band of black ; the plumes of the breast and lower parts are of a shining white, covered by two irregular bands of deep black, and tipped with a band of 204 THE BARRED-TAILED PHEASANT. the same colour; the middle of the belly, breast, thighs, and under tail-coverts, deep black ; the latter spotted with golden yellow. The tail is composed of eighteen feathers, which fold over each other, and when closed appear very narrow ; at the base they are about two inches in breadth, of a greyish white, clouded with a golden red upon the edges, and cross- ed on each side of the shaft with alternate crescent- shaped bars, brown at the shaft, and chestnut-co- loured at the edge. Temminck counted upon the feathers of his specimen above four feet in length, forty-seven of these bands. The feet and legs are greyish brown, and are armed with spurs, like the greater number of the genus. 205 SCEMMERING'S PHEASANT. Phasianus Scemmeringii, — TEMMIXCK. PLATE XVII. Faisan Scemmering, Phasianus Soemmeringii, Temminc7>°9 Planches Coloriees, pis, 487 and 488. THIS very beautiful species was sent to the Dutch collections by Dr Seiboldt from Japan, and is dedi- cated to the venerable Soemmering by M. Temminck, by whose description and figure it is only known. That naturalist describes it as intermediate in size between the common and golden pheasants, or about 3 feet 6 inches long. The plumage of the male is generally of a rich reddish-purple, with a shining or bronzy lustre, the feathers bordered with a band of still more brilliant appearance. Upon the under parts and wings, the colour becomes of a redder tint, with purple reflections, and mixed with large black spots. The tail is long and veiy ample, clouded with darker shades, and crossed with thirteen large black bands. The female is much smaller, being about nineteen inches long. The tail only about six inches in length, perfectly wedge-shaped, is of a lively red ; the feathers 206 SCEMMERING'S PHEASANT. except those in the centre, banded towards the tip with black ; the tip itself of the whole is white. The rest of the plumage is varied with black and reddish-brown ; the markings arranged in bars or crescents, a good deal similar to that of the common grey hen. We have here to notice another very interesting bird, of which Mr Gould has given a figure in his Century of Birds from the Himalayan mountains, under the title of Phasianus Staceii. The head is adorned with a considerable crest, and, with the neck, is of a dull tawny yellow, every feather, except on the cheeks and throat, being barred with black. The quill feathers are marked with zigzag lines, and are tipped with black ; the rump is rich red brown, ea ch feather having two spots of black near the tip; the tail is pale tawny, barred at regular distances with a narrow and broad band of deep blackish-brown ; t'ne under surface is pale tawny, barred on the back ; t\ie bill and tarsi brown. The total length is about thr ee feet four inches. Our next bird differs from the true or typi cal pheasants, in being also crested, and in having the tail in a manner folded, bending and very am pie. By Temminck it is placed first among the pbeasai its, after the Macartney Cock, with which he conclu des his genus Gallus ; it is \ ;• i 207 THE SILVER PHEASANT. Phasianus nycthemeruSi—'LiwMvs. PLATE XVIII. Phasianus nycthemerus, Linnceus, Latham. — Black and White Pheasant, Edwards. -Pencilled Pheasant, Lath- am— Faisan bicolor, Temminck, Pigeons et Gallinaces, ii. p. 281 THIS is one of the most powerful of the pheasants, and is a match in battle for a game cock. The naked space round the eyes is very large, and extends forward upon the nostrils, rising above each in the form of a small caruncle, and at the lower part fall- ing down in a small wattle. This part is of a soft velvety texture, and of a bright vermilion tint. The head is adorned with a long and ample crest of glossy purplish black feathers ; the throat and whole under parts of the same deep tint; the feathers covering those parts are of a lanceolate form, similar to those upon the same parts of the next genus we shall describe. The rest of the plumage may be said to be pure white, but the webs of each feather, from the upper part of the back downwards, are diagonally streaked with black, 208 THE SILVER PHEASANT. producing a beautiful wavy pencilled appearance. The tail is folded ; the centre feathers without the black waves and bending ; the others graduating to the outside, and broadly marked with black; the legs and feet are purple-lake. The female is smaller, the crest much less ample, and the tail more regularly graduated to the end ; the centre feathers brown, the outer ones obliquely streaked with black and white ; the upper parts are of a chaste greyish brown, with minute black irregu- lar bars. The under parts are white, irregularly marked with brown, and crossed with black bars. The Silver Pheasant is a native of the northern parts of China, where it is frequently kept in a tame state. It has often been imported alive to this coun- try, with the next it forms a very beautiful orna- ment to our aviaries, and, being perfectly hardy, it is reared with the greatest ease. Some attempts have been made to turn it out in the preserves, but generally without much success. They are with great difficulty raised from the ground, and may fall a frequent prey to all kinds of carnivorous animals ; they also drive off the common pheasant, and the sa- crifice in many instances has been thought too great. When in confinement they become extremely tame and familiar. THE GOLDEN PHEASANT. she plumage of the pheasants, we have the feath covering the rump, particularly upon the sides, long, narrow, with loose webs, almost like hackles, but of a texture quite stiff and almost horny. The female has the usual unobtrusive brownish plumage, broken with black crescent-formed bars, and the tail is short and regularly graduated. This bird is also a native of China, where it is called Kinki or Kinkee, Gold Flower-fowl, or Wroght Fowl. * It is kept in domestication, and may now be procured in considerable numbers from many parts in the south of England. Like the Sil- ver Pheasant, they have also been attempted to be set at large in the preserves, but generally a'vo with- out success. For the table they are said to be more delicate than the common pheasant ; their numbers are, however, too limited for them to be often seen in a cooked state. The feathers of the crest and ruff are held in much request by anglers, and parti- cularly to assist in dressing the gaudy Irish hooks. The other beautiful species now alluded to is LADY AMHERST'S PHEASANT. Phasianus Amherstia. — LEADBEATER. First described by Mr Leadbeater of London, in the Transactions of the Linriean Society, from two * Latham, General History. LADY AMHERST'S PHEASANT. 211 male specimens presented by the King of Ava to Sir J. Campbell, who gave it to Lady Amherst. " The feathers on the top of the head are green ; the crest-feathers are crimson, and 2^ inches in length ; the pendant tippet is of a beautiful white, each feather tipped with a dark green circular band, with a straight band of the same colour across each feather, about three-eighths of an inch above the end ; the whole depth of this tippet is 5^ inches, the long- est feathers 4J inches ; the neck, back, shoulders, chest, and wing-coverts are of a beautiful metallic green, each feather ending in a broad zone of velvet black ; the wing primaries dusky, with lighter colour- ed shafts, and white outer edges ; the greater wing- coverts and secondaries bluish-black ; the breast and belly white ; thighs and under tail- coverts mottled dark brown and white ; the legs light blue. The feathers on the rump are brown at the base, green in the middle, the remaining most exposed portion of a bright saffron-yellow ; the tail-coverts are also brown at the base, the centre portion barred green and white, ending in scarlet ; these feathers elongated to the extent of 10 inches, as their plan of insertion approaches that of the true tail primaries ; the first tail primary measures only 29 inches, the plume 1^ inch in depth, of a beautiful white ground, with broad bars of green about three-fourths of an inch apart, extending in the direction of the web, and mottled across from bar to bar ; the third and fourth primaries are the longest, and measure 38 inches $12 LADY AMHERST'S PHEASANT. each ; the inner web narrow and mottled black an white ; the outer web 1 f inch wide, with transverw circular dark green bars about three-fourths of an inc apart, on a ground the inner portion of which greyish-white, the outer part light chestnut- brown 213 GENUS EUPLOCOMUS,— TEMMINCK. THIS genus was formed by M. Temminck, for the reception of a few birds differing in form and structure from the cocks and pheasants, but still ap- pearing closely allied to both ; while its alliance to Lophophorus is also so great, that the founder of that genus has transferred one described by himself to the present little group. The form of the tail is one of the principal distinctions, being often forked, in all cases very ample ; the feathers broad, and pointed. The first we shall notice is 214 THE MACARTNEY COCK. Euplocomus Ignitus. PLATE XIX. MALE. XX. FEMALE. Fire-backed Pheasant of Java, Macartney, Embassy t China, pi. xiii. — Phasianus ignitus, Lath. Index Ornitho- logicus. — Houpifere Macartney — Gallus Macartneyi, Temminck, Pigeons et Gallinaces, ii. p. 273. THE first notice of this very beautiful bird is in the description of the embassy to China, under Lord Macartney. It was met with by Sir George Staun- ton in a menagerie at Batavia, and figured in the large Atlas of Plates accompanying the above men- tioned work. Temminck subsequently gave a des- cription of it in his Gallinaceous Birds, made from many specimens received from Sumatra. The length of the adult male is about 2 feet. The skin of the nostrils stretches backwards, and covers the sides of the head behind the eyes, and is of a bluish-purple. Upon the centre of the crown there is an upright crest, composed of feathers with a naked shaft, and expanding at the tip into a num- ber of slender barbs, which spread out and form a broadish crown. The head, neck, breast, belly, and upper part of the back, are of a very deep black, Native of China. SB? ET7PLOCOTHUS 10N1TTS. THE MACARTNEY COCK. 215 with steel-blue reflections. The feathers on the middle of the back are of a brilliant orange, or what would be called flame-colour, and in different lights assume various degrees of intensity of lustre. The rump and tail-coverts are broad and truncated, and are of a brilliant bluish-green, with a bar at the tip of a paler tint, and in those at the sides of the same colour with the orange of the centre of the back. The tail is slightly folded, like that of a hen, or, when seen flat, appears forked. The centre-feathers are white ; those on the out-side black, with green reflections. The legs and feet are bright vermilion. The female, Plate XX., only about 20 inches in length, has the plumage almost entirely of a rich cinna- mon-brown. On the upper parts the feathers are slightly mottled with black. The throat is white ; and the lower parts, of a paler tint than those above, have the feathers bordered with nearly pure white. The head wants the erect crest of the male ; but the fea- thers on the hind-head are lengthened. The tail ap- pears slightly forked. The Macartney Cock inhabits Sumatra ; but no- thing has yet been learnt regarding its habits. 216 PUCRAS PHEASANT. Euplocomus pucrasia. PLATE XXI. Pliasianus pucrasia, Pucras Pheasant, Gould's Century^ and Gray's Illustrations of Indian Zoology. THIS is one of the most beautiful of the Euplo- comi, but differs slightly from the typical examples in the form of the tail, which is more pheasant-lik? '''here seems to be considerable variations in the shades of the plumage of this bird. The most fre- quent tints are upon the head, throat, and neck, of a b autiful green, with blue and violet reflections. Up- on the sides of the neck there is a conspicuous patch of pure white. The head is crested with long, rather broad feathers, the first and shortest arising from the crown, of a reddish-yellow ; the others hanging over the back of the neck, of the same rich colour with the head and neck. The upper parts are of a rich brown ; the feathers of a lanceolate form, and dark Centres. The under parts are of a rich chestnut, and bordering this are lanceolate plumes, of a still gt eater length, nearly white ; the centres dark, tinged with yellow, and appearing conspicuous when lying over the darker plumage of the upper parts. F,r 1'1.()< OMl'S PURCHKA8IA PUCRAS PHEASANT. 217 The tail is ample, and above of a brownish-chest- nut. The female is very similar to those of Lopho- phorus and Tragopan, of a dull umber-brown, with dark waves and crosses. This bird inhabits the al- pine regions of India, and is yet but imperfectly known. To this same genus belong one or two beautiful birds even still less known than that now represent- ed. Among them is the Lophophorus Cuvierii of Temminck. The plumage of this is black, barred delicately with grey ; the rump with large truncated feathers, broadly edged with white. Temminck is of opinion, that his specimen, unique at the time, was scarcely adult, and that the plumage, with the exception of the rump, was glossy bluish-black. A bird which we lately received from India agrees with this, and is entirely of a rich bluish-black, ex- cept the rump. Another beautiful species, inhabiting Alpine India, has been figured by Mr Gould under the name of Phasianus albocristatus. In this the crest is com- posed of long hackly white feathers. The plume* upon the lower parts are very lanceolate in their form, and are conspicuously seen on the black shoulders and mantle. The rump-feathers are of the same broad form, with broad white margins. The next form we have to notice is 218 GENUS LOPHOPHORUS,— TEMMINCK. TEMMINCK instituted this genus in the Histoire Naturelle des Pigeons et Gallinaces, from what yet remains nearly a solitary species, the Impeyan Phea- sant of Latham. At the time of its formation, lie placed several other birds with it ; but he is now of opinion himself, that they will more properly range with the preceding genus Euplocomus. The only bird which has any claim to be reserved is what was described in " Ornithological Illustrations" as Lophophorus Nigelli ; but being a female, we cannot so clearly decide. This genus differs from Euplocomus in the form of the tail, which is flat and rounded ; the nearest approach to that being in the Ph. erythrop- thalmus of Raffles, and in the old Loph. Cuvierii of Temminck. The form of the bill is also much more hooked or curved downwards, as if intended to dig or root up bulbous plants, in the same way with some tribes of the partridges. The head is also splendidly and peculiarly crested, and the plu- mage extremely brilliant. Our next Plates will represent the male and fe- male of this splendid bird ; and we have to acknow- ledge our obligation to Mr Gould for permission to LOIMIOP I f OK V S IMPK YANFS. THE MACARTNEY COCK. 219 copy his beautiful Plates in the Century of Hima- layan Birds, by far the best which have ever ap- peared of this, and some other members of this beautiful family. IMPEYAN LOPHOPHORUS Lophophorus Impeyanus. PLATE XXII, MALE.— XXIII, FEMALE. Lophore resplendisant, Temminck, Pigeons et Gallinacis^ ii. p. 355 — Impeyan Pheasant, Latham's General History^ viii. p. 210. — Phasianus Impeyanus, Index Ornitholofficus, ii. 632 — Lophophorus Impeyanus, Gould's Century, Male and Female. THE splendour and changeability of the tints on the male of this bird, it is almost impossible to describe, either by words or the pencil. The greater proportion of the plumage is of varying hues of green, steel blue, violet and golden bronze. The texture is very dense and metallic looking, the feel soft and velvety. Upon the head there is a crest of feathers, composed of a naked shaft, with an oval tip of a si- milar texture with the rest of the plumage ; this ap- pears capable of erection at pleasure, but in a state of rest seems to recline or bend over the hind head. The centre of the back is pure white, following the distribution of colour which we have observed in the 220 IMPEYAN LOPHOPHORUS. Euplocomi ; the tail is plane, rounded, and of a bright chestnut, clouded transversely, with bars of a duller tint. The legs are armed with strong spurs. The female, Plate XX1IL, is considerably smaller. The feathers of the head lengthening behind, the throat and fore part of the neck pure white ; the rest of the plumage is of a pleasing reddish-brown, varied and mottled by spots and bars. There is no trace what- ever of the resplendent colours of the male. These splendid birds inhabit the alpine ranges of Nepaul and Himalaya, and with numerous others, almost as beautiful, enliven these stupendous soli- tudes ; little is known of their habits, and they have not yet been brought to Britain alive. The first specimens which were seen, were procured by the exertions of Lady Impey, and died after having lived on ship-board more than two months. Our next illustration represents the 221 GENUS TRAGOPAN,— CUVIER. THE Horned Pheasant of Edwards and Latham, for the reception of which the Baron Cuvier esta- blished his genus Tragopan, long puzzled ornitho- logists, and we have it accordingly changed from one place to another, and find it ranking sometimes with Phasianus, sometimes with Meleagris, and at ano- ther with Penelope. The form of these birds perhaps approach as near to the next genus, or the Guinea hen, as any other. The plumage is very ample ; the tail comparatively short ; but the most prominent feature about them is a loose pendent skin which hangs from the base of the lower mandibles, and can be inflated at pleasure ; and on the head, behind the eyes, two lengthened protuberances, which are also capable of enlargement and erection. The females, again, are of unobtrusive plumage, and resemble those of the last genus. This small group has been now extended to four species. The first we shall notice ia THE NEPAUL OR HORNED TRAGOPAN. Tragopan satyrus, — CUVIER. PLATE XXIV. Horned Pheasant, Edwards'1 Birds, pi. 116.— Phasianus sa- tyrus, Temminck, Histoire Naturelle des Pigeons et Galli- naces, ii. 349 — Horned Pheasant, Latham's General His- tory, viii. p. 208 — Tragopan satyrus, Cuvier, Regne Ani- mal, i. p. 479 — Gould's Century. IN looking over the various ornithological works in our possession for the history of these beautiful birds, we have been able to find literally nothing ; their habits are completely unknown, or not touch- ed upon. They seem confined to the more alpine regions, reach the limit of snow, and the present species has been brought from Thibet and Nepaul ; the next has been received from Himalaya. It would be of great importance to ornithologists, if notes were made regarding all the birds composing this genus, Euplocomus and Lophophorus. Until we know a little more regarding them, it is impossible to assign to them with any certainty a place in any system. This bird is about the size of a large domestic fowl. The bare skin is of a bright bluish-purple. THE HORNED TRAGOPAN. 223 The feathers on the crown are lengthened, of a dis- united texture, and are of a purplish-black, becom- ing deep crimson-red at the occiput. The back of the neck and bare skin in front are surrounded with deep black. The upper part of the back, neck, and all the under parts, are of a deep purplish cinnamon- red ; the wings and upper parts of an umber brown, and the tip of each feather has an ocellated spot of white ; these are largest and most conspicuous upon the flanks. The tail is rounded, but almost con- cealed by the tail-coverts, which are very ample, and spread over it in two ranges, each with a very con- spicuous and white spot. The tarsi are spurred. We have not seen the female of this species, b'lt Dr Latham describes it as nearly similar to the male, but having the colours less bright. If this is correct, there must be a considerable difference from this and the female of the next species, figured by Mr Gould, which almost resembles that of Lophophorus. 224 THE GOLDEN-BREASTED TRAGOPAN. Tragopan Hastingii. — GOULD. PLATE XXV. MALE— PLATE XXVI. FEMALE. Tragopan Hastingii, Gould's Century. THIS is another very beautiful species, about th« same size with the last, and figured and described by Mr Gould in his Himalayan Century. The horns and wattles are of the same bluish-purple. The crown is furnished with a lengthened crest of the same kind of disunited or hairy-looking feathers, pure black : the back of the neck, upper part of the back and shoulders, are of a deep uniform purplish- red : the wings, and whole of the upper parts, ex- cept the tail-coverts, are of a deep wood-brown, each feather having an ocellated spot of white, sur- rounded with black, most prominently conspicuous on the lower part of the back and tips of the se- condaries. Immediately below the naked wattles there is a patch of brilliant gol den- orange ; the f ,athers composing it narrow and lengthened, and jf a hard horny consistence, their points disunited, stretching over, and very conspicuous upon the deep black which covers the rest of the under parts. t I GOLDEN-BREASTED TBAOOPAN. 225 The tips of each feather covering the breast and belly are marked with a large white spot, with the dark shaft running through. The tail is black, clouded with brown ; the coverts do not extend so far over it as in the last, and are of a yellowish- white, with a narrow bar of black at the tip of each. The female given by Mr Gould, and represented on our Plate XXVI. is entirely of a dull umber- brown, marked with a variety of dark bars and waves. The feathers of the hind head are of the usual tex- ture, and are slightly lengthened behind. Neither wattles nor horns are apparent. Our next Plate represents a modification of this form in 226 BLACK-HEADED TRAGOPAN. Tragopan melanocephalus. — GRAY. PLATE XXVII. Satyra melanocephalus, Gray's Illustrations of Zooloffy. MR GRAY has given a representation of this bird in his Illustrations, from one of General Hardwick's drawings. It differs from the others in the want of any naked appendages to the head or throat, and in the head having a large crest, which is represented rising from the crown in erect feathers, with dis- united wehs, from the nostrils to the hind head : it is of a deep black, inclining to purple at the tip, and the whole of the head, cheeks, and throat are of the same colour, whence Mr Gray has taken his spe- cific name. The plumage bears a strong resemblance to the others, but we can give no detailed descrip- tion of it, or any information regarding its habits. A fourth species is also figured by Mr Gray, under the name of Satyra Pennantii, which is the last of the known species belonging to this division. TliA C, 0 PA \ .YTKL A3STOCEPIIALU.S . I BU-k ii,.a«loa Tragopau ) IVERSITY •UN 227 GENUS NUMIDA, Linnaus. THE last form which we have to describe in this Family is the Guinea Fowl, as they are generally termed, constituting the genus Numida of Lin- naeus. It contains only three or four species, all na- tives of Africa, and some of them were known to the ancients. During the zenith of the Roman Empire they bore a high value at the public feasts, and with its decline were for a time lost to Europe, to which they were again most probably introduced by the early Spanish navigators. Their plumage is very ample, their form compact and huddled together, and more formed for abode on the ground than for flight. The bill is curved and strong. They are gregarious* and roost on trees. We have figured as examples 228 THE CRESTED GUINEA-FOWL. Numida cristata — LATHAM. PLATE XXVIII. Pcintade a crete, Sojinini's Buffon — Peintade cornal, Tern- minck, Pigeons el Gallinaces^ ii. 448 Numida cristata, Crested Pintada, Latham. General History^ viii. p. 148. Vieillofs Gallerie, pi. ccix. THIS bird is considerably less than the Common Guinea-fowl, represented on the next Plate, which Bought properly to have come first in the order, the head and neck are bare, and of a dull blue, shaded into red upon the head. On the head, instead of the hard casque, there is an ample crest of hairy-like disunited feathers of a bluish-black, reaching as far forward as the nostrils, but in gene- ral turned backwards. The whole plumage, ex- cept the quills, is of a bluish-black, covered with small greyish spots, sometimes four, sometimes six, on each feather. The quills are pale yellowish brown, and the edges of the secondaries pure white, appearing very conspicuous from the contrast with the other parts. It is said by Temminck to inhabit the Great. Namaquas country, and to have the same manners with its congeners (T UNIVERSITY V5 229 THE COMMON GUINEA FOWL. Numida mtleagris — LINNAEUS. PLATE XXIX. Numida meleagris, Linnaeus, Latham — Peintade, Buffbn. — Peintade Meldagride, Temminck, Pigeons et Gallinacis% ii. p. 431. — Guinea Pintado, Latham, General History. rili. p. 144. THIS beautiful but rather clumsily formed bird is very generally known. As its name proclaims, it is a native principally of the Guinea coast, although it is also found in various other parts of Africa, and is mentioned by both Sparman and Le Vaillant as oc- curring near the Cape of Good Hope. They are difficult to raise from the ground, but, when pressed, fly with a powerful flight, and for a considerable distance. They live in flocks, the amount of their broods, but at some seasons assemble in hundreds, when their noise in going to roost upon the tree* is grating, and almost stunning. In this country they are kept in the poultry- yard, both for the sake of their young and eggs ; but being very quarrelsome to other poultry, and possessing great strength, they have often to be sacrificed to the pre- servation of the rest, or to be separately confined. 230 COMMON GUINEA FOWL. Several attempts have been made to turn them out in preserves, but this has never been persevered in, from their driving away and persecuting every other game. The plumage sometimes varies in being pure white. Another species is described under the name of the Mitred Guineafowl, AT. mitrata* It is said to be found in Madagascar, and is very closely allied to the common bird, differing chiefly in the ground colour of the plumage being darker, and in the spots *eing larger. The cry and habits are nearly similar. REMARKS ON THE ARRANGEMENT. 231 WE have now seen most of the members of this useful family; but, as we mentioned at the commencement, they are not arranged in the order they should properly stand. This, even now, we may be unable to do as we should finally desire, having not had an opportunity of examining minutely all the forms, or of arranging the other families which compose this order ; but the fol- lowing short table will serve as some guide how they should be placed. The Rasores, or third order of birds, contains the families Pavonidce, Tetraonidce, Cracidce, Struthioni- dee, Columbidce. The family Pavonidce contains the genera and sub- genera. PAVO. Meleagris. Polyplectron. Argus. PH ASIAN us. Callus. EUPLOCOMUS? LOPHOPHORUS. Tragopan. NUMIDA. These are the genera at present established; it is, however, probable, that one or two sub-genera will still be found necessary, particularly in Phasianus. The opinions regarding whether Pavo or Phasianus 232 REMARKS ON THE ARRANGEMENT. should stand as the typical form, are at variance among our ornithologists. Mr. Vigors, in his arrangement, proposes the latter, Mr. Swanson Pavo, which for the present we have adopted. Looking at the forms of both, we find the tarsus and foot of nearly equal pro- portional strength, the hallux articulated above the plane of the foot, but in Pavo proportionably shorter, and the nail short. In this form, also, flight, from the unwieldiness of the plumage, is seldom resorted to, except in extremities ; and the tail cannot be used in directing it. In Phasianus flight is often resorted to, and is powerful, though not capable of being long sus- tained, and the tail is used in directing it : it therefore deviates more from the peculiarities of the order. The other forms are more difficult to fix. We are uncer- tain, whether Euplocomus should not only form a sub -genus of Lophophorus, and of the situation of Tragopan. In both, the attributes of flight and perching are more extensively used. Numida, again, seems to connect the next family, by its alliance to the partridges, in the form of the tail and feet, harsh cry, and general habits. The more extensive examination of the whole order, will, we trust, enable us, ere long, to solve all these difficulties ; and we now prefer mentioning them as they have occurred, to leaving them altogether un- noticed. At the conclusion of this volume, it has occurred to us, that a few observations on the more Common and Useful Varieties of POULTRY, and the POULTRY YARD, might not be unacceptable. THE name Poultry is derived from the French word Poulet, and comprehends all the domestic varieties which we are in the habit of rearing for the table, whether they be Land or Water Birds. COMMON OR BARN-DOOR FOWL, AND TURKEY. THE most approved breed of the Common Fowl, is procured from the Dorking Cock, crossed with any Domestic Hen. The Dorking is very frequently dis- tinguished by the peculiarity of possessing five toes on each foot, by their pure white colour, and their supe- rior plumpness, with delicacy of flavour and whiteness in the flesh. Black or Speckled Hens are, however, esteemed better layers, and, in our experience, are less inclined to sit than most other varieties ; which is par- ticularly the case with the black breed of Poland. 234 COMMON OR BARN-DOOR FOWL, When the rearing of Poultry is entered upon, on a moderate scale, care should be taken to select a warm well sheltered apartment, for their lodging in during the night, and for placing the nests for laying their eggs in. The nests, for the purpose of laying in, may be arranged in tiers, one above another, in chequers, and may be constructed of wood, filled with straw or hay, once a-week — cleanliness in this and every particular being very essential. They should have a foot-board in front, for the purpose of the birds perching easily into them, and a fillet in front, to hold in the straw ; and the situation in the apartment ought to be darkish rather than light, on account that Hens do not like to be disturbed in this operation. They should also be supplied with a ladder or stick, to assist them in perch- ing up, as care should be taken not to injure the bird in its passage to the nest, when about to deposit her *gg- Nests prepared for the business of incubation, should have moveable gratings to place before them, to pre- vent the intrusion of other Hens while the mother is sitting. This grating must be taken off in the morning, when the other Fowls in the yard are being fed, the noise of which operation will, in general, excite the mother to rise and feed also ; but should she delay to get off her eggs, she may be removed carefully, and placed near to the feeding board, when, after having AND TURKEY. 235 satisfied herself, she will return to the nest, and the grating is to be replaced. She will not require food again till next morning at the same time. In this manner we have attended to half a dozen Hens and a couple of Turkeys, engaged in the process of incuba- tion at the same time ; the operation of removing and replacing the whole, not occupying more than half an hour each morning, and the birds, without the least confusion, all again set upon their respective nests. The attention incident upon these creatures at this time is very interesting; in a day or two, they become so familiar, as to permit themselves to be handled with- out fear, apparently conscious that no harm is meant ; and as the period when the chick is destined to emerge from the shell approaches, they become more cautious and solicitous, that no injury shall befal the tender cases which envelope their future hopes. The time which a Common Hen sits is twenty-one days, that of a Turkey and Duck about twenty-nine or thirty days. On the day previous to being hatched, the chirp of the bird in the shell proclaims, both to the attendant and parent, that the young are about to make ap- pearance ; and, on the day following, if all goes well, the whole brood will be found rolling amongst broken fragments of their late frail tenements. The mother is, at this juncture, to be handled with very great care and tenderness ; she is to be removed to the feeding board, 236 COMMON OR BARN-DOOR FOWL, where her anxiety will only permit of a very momen- tary absence, during which the shells are to be removed, and a small quantity of fine meadow hay inserted into the bottom of the nest, the chicks being previously held in a small basket till the return of the parent, who in- stinctively makes for and occupies her former abode, no doubt sufficiently alarmed at the apparent absence of her young, but which fear is soon removed, by their being placed one by one under her. We have re- peatedly experienced the value of this precaution, in saving the chicks from being overlaid, through the rest- less anxiety of the mother, to secure the brood under her fostering wings, after feeding herself. It is of great consequence to have a proper quantity of dry sand or ashes near the feeding-board, in which the sitters may rub themselves, in order to disengage any vermin adhering to their bodies, causing such rest- lessness, as in some cases to induce them to desert their charge ; and along with this requisite, water in abun- dance must be provided. We quote, from the interesting work of M. Bucknell, Esq., the following account of the progressive stages of life, as developed in the egg of a Common Hen : — - On the third day the embryo organization of the skull, brain, heart, and blood, is perceptible by the aid of a magnifying glass. AND TURKEY. 237 Fourth day — The pulsation of the heart is distin- guishable by the naked eye. Sixth day — The chief vessels and organs rudimen- tally formed; the pulsation and circulation of blood apparent. Ninth day — Intestines and veins formed, and the deposition of flesh and bony substance commenced; the beak for the first time opens. Twelfth day — The feathers have protruded; the skull has become cartilaginous ; and the first voluntary movement of the chick is made. Fifteenth day — Organs, vessels, bones, feathers, closely approaching in appearance to the natural state. Eighteenth day — Vital mechanism nearly developed, and the first sign of life heard from the piping chick. Twenty-first day — The chicks break the shell, and in two or three hours are quite active and lively. We have perused various modes of tending and feeding the young brood, upon its first appearance, but have found none more successful than the following : — The parent is to be removed, along with the young, to a box or other receptacle, under cover, about four or five feet square, and eighteen inches deep. She, with the brood, are to be placed in a small coop, inside the box, so that she may be secured from treading upon them. A little soft hay should be put into the coop, and some dry sand or earth in a corner of the box, and the food placed within reach of both. 238 COMMON OR BARN-DOOR FOWL, The coop may be constructed in the following man- ner : — A wooden frame, of eighteen inches square, with one door in front, in two halves, in the form of a grat- ing, to permit of the chicks getting easily out and in for their food, &c., and another door, outside of that, for shutting all in at night. Our own wooden frames are covered with coarse canvass, which is both lighter and cooler, than if constructed altogether of boards. For Turkeys the dimensions must be proportionally larger — about two feet square — formed in the same way. To prevent the other Poultry having access to the young brood, there should be a grating in front of the coop, in which the food and water is to be placed, and, in the course of the first or second day, the chicks will find their way to both. The vessel containing the water should, of course, be very shallow, with a few pebbles placed in it to prevent the birds getting wet — precautions which, although obvious, are sometimes not thought upon. Being economists in our way, we have constructed very suitable coops out of old tea-chests. At this stage of life many are the odd condiments recommended ; but the food should consist of coarse oat meal, or bruised grits, for the chicks, with oats for the mother. In a few days, a little soft boiled rice may be mixed with the meal, and they will have no objection to a few small worms, and a little chick-weed occa- sionally. We kave fed our Turkeys most successfully AND TURKEY. 239 in the same way, with only substituting bread and milk, instead of worms ; and chopped cresses or turnip shaws, in place of the chick-weed. Both will be the better of a little fine gravel and some particles of lime thrown in their way. Generally speaking, the chicks should only get into their power such a supply of food at a time as they can nearly consume at once ; for if more is placed before them, it is trodden down and wasted ; but care should be taken that they receive that little very often — at least five or six times a-day. The chicks of Common Fowls should not get out of the box for at least a fort- night, and Turkeys fully three weeks, during which time the parents are mostly to be confined to the coop, unless the weather be very fine, in which case both may be permitted a little liberty. • The Turkey is generally thought to be a tender bird when young, and difficult to be reared, although in our experience this is not the case. Our breed is the pure white variety; and, the first season, the hen hatched and brought to full maturity fifteen birds. In her second year, she and one of her daughters reared about thirty, which were fed up to full size. The old lady deserted during the existence of the charge, and com- menced laying eggs, which were consumed in the family. This is the third season, and the mother and daughter, at its commencement, very early in spring, 240 COMMON OR BARN-DOOR FOWLt hatched only nineteen between them. The old bird again deserted her young, having handed over her charge to the junior parent, after which she laid and hatched twelve eggs, nine of which are all, at present, strong healthy birds, with every promise of being brought to full maturity of size. In the successful management of this bird, much de- pends upon continued care in keeping them perfectly dry and warm, particularly during wet, moist, or hazy weather, with very frequent small supplies of the food already recommended. When they come to be about full size, they will be found to be even more hardy, and stronger than other common poultry, frequently roost- ing upon trees, in the open air, during the night, and braving the roughest and most inclement weather with impunity. It is 'singular, and very interesting, to contemplate the quick-sightedness of the chick, about two or three weeks old, in capturing flies, and all sorts of small insects, as articles of food, while they are needling their tiny bodies through the grass, or brushwood of any kind. We were this season much amused, while watching our beautiful little brood stripping off the small green insects which were infesting our rose bushes. We have already said, that we have found simple food most advisable for these birds when young, and we cannot refrain from deprecating the use of all AND TURKEY. 241 pungent articles, such as pepper, of all sorts. Chopped nettles are also recommended, but will be found a most annoying food. We, on one occasion, ventured upon a trial of them ; but we shall never forget the pain which was produced in the mouths of these tender little crea- tures, from the sting of this noxious weed. Some sort of net or grating should cover in the box, to prevent the Hen, when out of the coop, from leaping or flying over, in her restless anxiety, which increases daily, until set at large with her little brood. The box may either be placed in the open air or in the house, according to the state of the weather and season of the year. We have said, that a board should be used for placing the- food upon, whatever it may consist of, being preferable, in our opinion, to a trough, in which the food is apt to get sour, while the board does not labour under that objection, and can be readily cleaned. All descriptions of Poultry are the better of being fed up generously from the very shell, and we prefer the flesh of those brought up at large, to those which are artificially fed, or crammed, as the phrase is. We have found a mixture, neither too moist nor too dry, of boiled potatoes and barley, or pease meal, equal parts, excellent feeding, either for producing eggs, or good sound flesh for the table; and this mixture seems to suit all varieties, whether Land or Water Poultry: it 242 has the recommendation of being easily and universally procurable, and not over expensive; and, with this, one feed of good corn, in the middle of the day, will be advisable and sufficient. In the absence of potatoes, the two sorts of meal just mentioned, with a third part of sharps or fine bran, will make a suitable mess. The Poultry Yard should be enclosed in such a man- ner, as to render it convenient for confining the birds when required ; but the more they are at liberty be- yond its narrow range, the better for their health at all times, on account of the quantity of green food and insects, requisite to make up their proper nourishment. Before dismissing this portion of our subject, and commencing with a short account of the Domestic Water Fowls, we quote the following from the work of the celebrated White of Selborne : — " In so extensive a subject, sketches and outlines are as much as can be expected ; for it would be endless to instance, in all the infinite variety of the feathered na- tion. We shall, therefore, confine the remainder of this letter to the few Domestic Fowls of our yards, which are most known, and therefore best understood. And first, the Peacock, with his gorgeous train, demands our atten- tion ; but, like most of the gaudy birds, his notes are grating and shocking to the ear : the yelling of cats, and the braying of an ass, are not more disgustful. The voice of the Goose is trumpet-like and clanking ; and AND TURKEY. 243 one saved the Capitol of Rome, as grave historians as- sert : the hiss also of the Gander is formidable and full of menace, and ' protective of his young/ Among Ducks the sexual distinction of voice is remarkable; for, while the quack of the female is loud and sonorous, the voice of the Drake is inward and harsh, and feeble, and scarce discernible. The Cock Turkey struts and gobbles to his mistress in a most uncouth manner; he hath also a pert and petulant note when he attacks his adversary. When a Hen Turkey leads forth her young brood, she keeps a watchful eye; and if a bird of prey appear, though ever so high in the air, the careful mother announces the enemy with a little inward moan, and watches him with a steady and attentive look ; but, if he approach, her note becomes earnest and alarming, and her outcries are redoubled. " No inhabitants of a yard seem possessed of such a variety of expression, and so copious a language, as Common Poultry. Take a chicken, of four or five days old, and hold it up to a window where there are flies, and it will immediately seize its prey, with little twitterings of complacency; but if you tender it a wasp or a bee, at once its note becomes harsh, and expressive of dis- approbation and a sense of danger. When a Pullet is ready to lay, she intimates the event by a joyous and easy soft note. Of all the occurrences of their life, that of laying seems to be the most important ; for no sooner has a Hen disburdened herself, than she rushes 244 forth with a clamorous kind of joy, which the Cock and the rest of his mistresses immediately adopt. The tumult is not confined to the family concerned, but catches from yard to yard, and spreads to every home- stead within hearing, till at last the whole village is in an uproar. As soon as a Hen becomes a mother, her new relation demands a new language ; she then runs clocking and screaming about, and seems agitated as if possessed. The father of the flock has also a conside- rable vocabulary; if he finds food, he calls a favourite concubine to partake ; and if a bird of prey passes over, with a warning voice he bids his family beware. The gallant chanticleer has, at command, his ainorous phrases and his terms of defiance. But the sound by which he is best known, is his crowing : by this he has been distinguished in all ages as the countryman's clock or larum, as the watchman that proclaims the divi- sions of the night. Thus the poet elegantly stiles him : ' • ' ' the crested Cock whose clarion sounds The silent hours.' " A neighbouring gentleman, one summer, had lost most of his chickens by a Sparrow-hawk, that came glid- ing down between a faggot pile and the end of his house to the place where the coops stood. The owner, inwardly vexed to see his flock thus diminishing, hung a setting net adroitly between the pile and the house, into which the caitif dashed, and was entangled. Re- sentment suggested the law of retaliation ; he there- AND TURKEY. 245 fore clipped the Hawk's wings, cut off his talons, and fixing a cork on his bill, threw him down among the brood-hens. Imagination cannot paint the scene that ensued; the expressions that fear, rage, and revenge inspired, were new, or at least such as had been unno- ticed before : the exasperated matrons upbraided, they execrated, they insulted, they triumphed. In a word, they never desisted from buffetting their adversary till they had torn him in a hundred pieces." UNIVERSITY 246 THE PEA FOWL. WE cannot, in this place, resist the opportunity now afforded, of noting down some circumstances which fell under our own observation, regarding the sagacity of a favourite Pea Hen, generally supposed a very wild bird : — In her third year, and very early in spring, the weather being most unsettled and stormy, she com- menced the process of depositing her eggs, the first of which she dropped in a situation perfectly open and unprotected, the consequence of which, as might have been expected, was its immediate destruction by the Magpies. Of this blasting of her hopes, however, she was unconscious ; and she sat perched, during a fearful night, upon the naked branch of a high tree, watching over the precious deposit. Next day she soon dis- covered her loss, and immediately selected a more secluded spot for her future operations, in the imme- diate view, and about fifty yards from our dwelling- house. We used the precaution to cover this second egg with the dried leaves of the beech tree. The third day she not only deposited another egg, but added some more leaves -herself, which we encouraged sparingly, THE PEA FOWL. 247 lest we should cause her to desert her charge. Six eggs were in this way deposited and secured, and which, with the one destroyed at first, made seven, four of which were hatched. During the long period of hatch- ing, in the most inclement season, exposed to very severe weather, we resolved to run the risk of endea- vouring to protect the devoted bird. The first day we put up a branch or two over the spot she had chosen ; then a few more ; and during a pitiless night, a com- plete awning was erected, consisting of a piece of mat- ting, which screened her from the incessant rain and wind, like an umbrella. During all these operations the bird continued to sit upon her nest, apparently conscious of the care and sympathy exerted in her behalf. It would thus appear, that with proper pre- caution, this bird may be managed with nearly as much freedom as the Common Domestic Fowl, and instead of being a rara avis in our yards, it might form a profitable and highly ornamental addition. The flesh of the young bird for the table is, in our opinion, exquisite ; much superior to that of the Turkey, resem- bling more that of the Common Pheasant. Although this bird be more independent of regular supplies of food being held up to it than other Domestic Poultry, yet, when young, the Chicks should be repeatedly attended to, and the same food which we have recom- mended before, namely, oat meal, a very little mois- tened, will be found very suitable for them. 248 GUINEA FOWL. WE purposely pass over the breeding and rearing of Guinea Fowl, with only a very few observations, our; experience being, that it is a bird which retains too much of its original wild nature to be bred and kept with advantage. It is easily made to forsake the nest, which the Hen secretes with great care and adroitness, generally in the midst of standing corn, so that, in most cases, it falls a sacrifice to the reaper's operations, or is destroyed when they are upon the field. We once reared, at the latter end of the month of September, a large flock of seventeen, under a Common Hen, from eggs got in such circumstances, the proper parent, being scared, having deserted them; and we were most successful in bringing the whole brood to nearly the size of their foster mother, when a dis- temper, not understood, and which it baffled all our attempts to arrest, carried them off one by one, till at length the Hen, tired out, forsook the last three or four remaining birds, the strongest of the brood ; but, to our grief and disappointment, even these also became victims to the same fatal malady. Before the birds began to droop, they were very strong and promising ; but the lateness of the season must have been very trying j;o them, and most probably the cause of the illness, which proved so destructive. 249 DOMESTIC WATER FOWL. DUCKS. GEESE and Ducks are our most common domestic Water Fowl, and both may be reared with advantage, and, in our experience, without much trouble. Ducklings may be brought out either under a natural mother, or a Common Hen ; and, during the first week or two, should be managed in a manner similar to that recom- mended before for Turkeys and Common Fowls. On the second or third day, they acquire consider- able strength, and in a couple of weeks, are nearly independent of all care, running about, in all directions, after grubs and insects, if within reach. They should be kept from much exercise in water for fully three weeks, however, and ought not to be permitted to get wetted by rain, from which they suffer considerably at this tender age. There are various breeds of this most useful Fowl, amongst which may be mentioned the Aylesborough, the White or English, and the Dark Brown, approach- ing to the plumage of the Common Wild Duck. 250 DOMESTIC WATER FOWL — DUCKS. The presence of a small running stream of water, or a wholesome pond, is of course indispensable in the rearing and keeping of these birds to advantage, and without trouble, for without this they are miserable dirty looking objects ; while, on the contrary, nothing can exceed the interest which arises from looking at their droll evolutions, and beautiful gestures, in their own natural element. Ducks are profitable as layers of eggs, of which they deposit prodigious numbers, commencing early in spring, and seldom leaving off the operation, daily, till towards autumn; and although their eggs are not esteemed so highly as those of the Common Fowl, they are most useful in many domestic purposes. Their food may consist of the same materials as that already mentioned for other Poultry. Ducks may be housed at night in the same apart- ment with other Poultry, care being taken to protect them from the droppings of the birds perched upon the roosts above them, and a proper comfortable bed of straw strewed on the ground below, for the Ducks to rest upon ; the heat arising, and ascending to the other birds upon the roosts, we believe, benefits both. 251 DOMESTIC WATER FOWL. GEESE. • As we have no great experience in the rearing of Geese, we shall quote from a very useful work, in two volumes, by R. W. DICKSON, M. D., London, 1805 : — " There are several distinct breeds of Geese kept in different places ; but the largest and most useful sort, whether for the purpose of food or feathers, is the com- mon breed. " In the choice of store Geese, care should always be taken to procure them as large in size as possible, and from places where they have been well kept. Geese, like most other birds, begin to lay in the spring months; and the earlier this happens the better, as the price of early green Geese is generally high, and in some cases it may be possible to have a second brood. Both these purposes may be promoted by letting them be well fed with oats, grains, or some such kinds of food at the 252 DOMESTIC WATER FOWL — GEESE. period. The Goose generally lays from eight to twelve eggs. It may be known when Geese are about to lay, from straw being frequently picked up and carried about by them. The length of time of sitting is about thirty days. When Geese are inclined to sit, they generally show it, by remaining on their nest after laying a considerable time. In this case, a proper quan- tity of eggs, as from ten to twelve, should be placed, in the nests, and something put before them, so as to prevent the Geese from being much seen. They should also have plenty of food, sand, and water, near them, in order that they may not have to remain long off the nests, and in that way let the eggs be too much cooled. The Ganders should be left with them as guards. When the weather is warm, they generally hatch rather sooner than when it is cold. After the Goslings are hatched, the best method is to let them remain with the Goose, especially where they are strong, in some warm sunny place, that is well secured against the entrance of rats, and all other sorts of vermin, and which is properly supplied with water ; being well fed with the crumbs of bread, grits, wheat, and some chopped clivers. They should remain in this confinement until they are grown strong, and capable of following the Goose with ease ; they may then be put into a small field, or paddock, where the grass is short, till they are fit to be turned out with the Geese. When they are weakly, it is cus- tomary to feed them in the house, with bread, soaked in DOMESTIC WATER FOWL — GEESE. 253 milk, or a little barley-meal, &c. Where this is done, they should, however, always be put under the Goose again, immediately after such feeding, and handled as little as possible, warmth in this stage being the most essential article in rearing them. They should never be suffered, while very young, to go into the water, as the cold soon destroys them. " The practice in Lincolnshire, where vast numbers of these birds are annually produced, is for their nests to be made for them of straw, and confined, so as that the eggs cannot roll out when the Geese turn them, which they do every day. When near hatching, the shell is broken a little against the beak or nib of the Gosling, to give air, or to enable it to receive strength to throw off the shell at a proper time. " The time of plucking them is about the beginning of April, when the fine feathers of their breasts and backs should be gently and carefully plucked. Care must be taken not to pull or interrupt their down or pen feathers. " The quills should be pulled five out of a wing. They will bear pulling in thirteen or fourteen weeks again, or twice in a year: the feathers three times a-year, of the old Geese and Ganders, seven weeks from each pulling. The young Geese may be pulled once at thirteen or fourteen weeks old, but not quilled, being hatched in March. But when late in hatching, the brood Geese should not be plucked so soon as April, 254 DOMESTIC WATER FOWL — GEESE. but the month after. When well fed with barley and oats, they thrive and do better, and their feathers grow faster, and are better in quality than where it is omit- ted. They must constantly have plenty of grass and water. " In many parts of this fenny district, vast advantage is made by the frequent plucking of the Geese. At Pinchbeck, it is the practice to pluck them five times in the year, as at Lady-day, Midsummer, Lammas, Michaelmas, and Martinmas. The feathers of a dead Goose are worth 6d., three giving a pound. But pluck- ing alive does not yield more than 3d. a-head per an- num. Some wing them only every quarter, taking ten feathers from each Goose, which sell at 5s. a thousand. Plucked Geese pay in feathers Is. a head in Wildmore Fen. " In the fattening of Cfreen Geese, care should be taken that a little green food be given, along with the oats or other grain, that may be employed for the pur- pose when they are put up, and that they be well supplied with water and sand* A fortnight or three weeks is long enough for this purpose, if they be well and regularly fed ; but, in the fattening of the older Geese, there will not be any necessity for the green food. The place in which they are confined, with this view, should neither be too light, nor too public in its situation, as they do not feed so well, where these points are not attended to. They should likewise be DOMESTIC WATER FOWL — GEESE. 255 at a distance, so as to be out of the hearing of the old or store Geese. " Besides the benefits that may be derived from Geese in the feathers and the birds as food, it seems not im- probable, but that they might be made to produce a con- siderable advantage in the way of manure, if managed under a system of constant littering with straw, fern, or some other substance of the same kind, as from the great quantity of grass they consume, the discharge in the night is very considerable." FEINTED BT W. H. LIZAKS, EDINBURGH. RETURN TO the circulation desk of any University of California Library or to the NORTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY Bldg. 400, Richmond Field Station University of California Richmond, CA 94804-4698 \LL BOOKS MAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DA> 2-month loans may be renewed by calling (415)642-6233 I -year loans may be recharged by bringing boo to NRLF Renewals and recharges may be made 4 da prior to due date DUE AS STAMPED BELOW 1 0 1989 BIOLOGY ' "KX, THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY