i

erry
лия y
errr

ult

ii

(titi

11 eR a hin ee ee
RON li Sa т NP ag Hy

|

SI Арье mee net $e
= =...

deer ту . и
о ера ор оч и ce eee ea
4 ap aw

А

PAC де С об ems ee
I) к ыы
taped ae

i

|

А ель О a py Sat Sopa os
ey Carer
3 Cte Ep ae, ue

|

ма ме ром
a md hae ge

i

il

one вы

у ут anand ee ee ena ad = - - : - - nn eae wuss on ~ - wn - - r — „. =
2 Pe ome 4 <p: Мери р : = -
ep eda a aes + > : .

у дым ashes ne me gp фев мик

и. С
$ -— лы ete tee
he ne

we a

plete рты mm

вы

ee ль

ры

—-=—-.

о роль ме рат ct пож анна

НН

a

<

ео 4Nu ieodenmAy

ыы

И eal ЧИ

А. Я
; Re en

ba

ep ee,

Ren eas el ll

*(eHHAMAD °И “[] MdAeH я> инодевяе o7])

“I g6gr gdovanad чя ‘илоегоо yowoyetddy, ‘чиАя-чнедие gdoco epy

‘(174315 294) 8681

Go

ideas

‘AJOPIIOT, WwsIny, “[ny-uesey uo э$9э5)

пе. ts Inet

meas ota sare acm alii ба

nine

и ПОТЕ

eres ра м Иер

Oy, “L pate
ие? $. fon AgAGX

oe ь #

eS. 7 гр У

о: ви:
®

YTHE GEESE OF EUROPE
AND ASIA

BEING THE DESCRIPTION OF MOST OF THE
OLD WORLD SPECIES

BY

SERGIUS ALPHERAKY

CORRESPONDING MEMBER OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SECTION OF THE IMPERIAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE, ST. PETERSBURG ;
HON. MEMBER OF THE RUSSIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY ; MEMBER OF THE IMPERIAL
RUSSIAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY, ETC., ETC.

WITH

TWENTY-FOUR COLOURED PLATES BY F. W. FROHAWK

Е.В. 5, №.5.©. 6.

AND

FRONTISPIECE BY DR. P. P. SUSHKIN

LONDON: ROWLAND WARD, Lirp.
“THE JUNGLE,” PICCADILLY

MCMV

hence

aif
i fh

PREFACE

THE present work is a translation of my Gwsz¢ Rossi published in Russia in 1904.
| As all the known species and sub-species of Palaearctic geese are described and figured,
I decided to change the title of the English edition to 7e Geese of Europe and Asia.

To many it may seem strange or even improbable that such large, conspicuous, and
familiar birds as geese should hitherto have been imperfectly studied and some of the
forms confounded with one another, not only by sportsmen, but by many ornithologists ;
but that this is an indubitable fact is, I think, fully demonstrated in the present volume.

After finishing the description of the geese of the Palzearctic region, I could not help
feeling greatly disappointed. Having undertaken the task in the hope that I should be
able to give as full information about each separate species as I had furnished for the
ducks in my U7¢kz Rossiz, Г became convinced that I had not succeeded in my attempt.

In spite of the comparatively large amount of material which passed through my
_ hands, and despite the diligence with which I studied almost the whole of the sporting and
scientific literature concerning these birds, I found so many defects in our knowledge and
so many questions left open that I cannot regard the present work otherwise than as ргерага-
tory to future investigation, and not as a complete monograph.

Only one work exists dealing with all the geese of the Old World which deserves
serious attention, namely, Mr. 5. A. Buturlin’s Ре Gust Rossitskot Птреги, which appeared
in 1901. Ц was the first attempt, founded on a careful study of the literature, to sift the
evidence for each separate form of geese ; and this young and gifted ornithologist has shown
great skill in his difficult task. Nevertheless, in consequence of too great confidence in the
trustworthiness of authors and inadequate material for comparison, Mr. Buturlin arrived
at certain conclusions with which I cannot agree, and which are discussed in their proper
place, in the present work.

Many of my personal views will no doubt in their turn be disputed by sportsmen
and ornithologists, who have not had in their hands so much material as has been in my
own. I have therefore entered into great detail—too great, probably, for the majority of
readers—in support of my conclusions.

The reader, then, must not be surprised to discover repetitions in the descriptions of

the bills of certain kinds of geese, as these were, in my opinion, unavoidable. They of
У

vi Geese of Europe and Asia

course make the book heavy reading, but if my main object—clearness—is attained, I trust
to escape blame on this score.

While giving almost all the synonyms for each species and race, I considered it
unnecessary to quote every reference, especially as this has been already done by Count
Salvadori in vol. xxvii. of the British Museum Catalogue of Birds. I have, however, made an
exception in the case of Russian writers, both scientific and sporting, since they are far
less known in England than they deserve.

My special thanks are due to the following gentlemen for their assistance in preparing
the present book :—

Mr. F. W. Frohawk, to whom I owe not only the truthful and masterly drawings of
geese and their bills reproduced in the plates, but also numerous notes on specimens in the
British Museum and private collections.

Dr. V. Bianchi, Curator of the Ornithological Department of the Zoological Museum
of the St. Petersburg Academy of Science. Professor M. A. Menzbier and Dr. P. P. Sushkin,
who sent me valuable specimens for examination—the latter having also furnished me with
highly interesting MS. notes and given me the water-colour sketch, by himself, representing —
a scene of goose-life on one of the lakes of the Turgai district, which served as the original
to the frontispiece.

Mr. S. A. Buturlin, who has helped me in every way, with material and notes and the
MS. extract from his diary kept on the voyage to Kolguev and Novaia Zemlia, which the
reader will find at the end of this volume.

Мг. С. Е. Gobel, the well-known odlogist, who has kindly placed at my disposal his
MS. notes on the eggs of geese, part of which is given as an appendix to the present work.

Professor N. F. Kashchenko, of Tomsk University; the well-known traveller and
ornithologist, Мг. М. A. Zarudny; Mr. A. P. Semenov; and Prince У. 5. Kochubei, to whom
I am indebted for specimens of the highest interest.

And the translator, Mr. John Marshall, M.A., Trinity College, Cambridge.

SERGE ALPHERAKY.

St. PETERSBURG, August 1904.

CONTENTS

PAGE

INTRODUCTION ; , : : ; ; ; I
KEY TO GENERA, SPECIES, AND SUB-SPECIES . ; Beste ; я
GENUS СнЕм, BOIE (1822) РЕ = Ра
SNOW-GOOSE (Chen hyperboreus, Pallas) . ; 12
GREATER SNOW-GOOSE (Chen nivalis, Forster) . | ; 18
GENUS PHILACTE, BANNISTER (1870) . : : ; 20
EMPEROR-GOOSE (Pidlacte canagica, Sevastianov) , 20
GENUS AWSER, BRISSON (1760) ; | 24
GREY-LAG GOOSE (Aznser = inate a= : = | 24
WHITE-FRONTED GOOSE (Auser albifrons, Scopoli) , ; 42
LESSER WHITE-FRONTED GOOSE (Аязег finmarchicus, Gunner) . : 59
GENUS MWzLANONYX, BUTURLIN (1901) : ; : 72
SUSHKIN’S GOOSE (Welanonyx neglectus, Sushkin) ; ; : 78
PINK-FOOTED GOOSE (Melanonyx brachyrhynchus, Baillon) ; : | | 87
YELLOW-BILLED BEAN-GOOSE (Melanonyx arvensis, Brehm) ; 94
MIDDENDORFF’S GOOSE (Melanonyx arvensis sibiricus, Alphéraky) = 104
BEAN-GOOSE (Melanonyx зесейии, Gmelin) ; ; ТТО
“NOVAIA ZEMLIA BEAN-GOOSE” (Melanonyx carnetrostris, Buturlin) : 120
EASTERN BEAN-GOOSE (Melanonyx segetum serrirostris, Swinhoe) oe 3
THICK-BILLED GOOSE (Melanonyx mentalts, Oates) | : 130
GENUS: £ULABEIA, REICHENBACH (1852) , 133
BAR-HEADED GOOSE (Eulabeta indica, Latham) . : Е.
GENUS RuriBRENTA, BONAPARTE (1856) ; | 140
RED-BREASTED GOOSE (Rujfibrenta ruficollis, Pallas) ; | 140
GENUS BRANTA, SCOPOLI (1769) 150
BRENT GOOSE (Branta bernicla, Linn.) . ; 150
LIGHT-BELLIED BRENT (branta bernicla glaucogaster, Brehm) 158
BLACK BRANT (Lranta bernicla nigricans, Lawrence) : : : : 162
GENUS LEUCOBLEPHARON, BAIRD (1858) : ee 166
HUTCHINS’S GOOSE (Leucoblepharon hutchinsi, Richardson) Ree : 166

Vil

Vill Geese of Europe and Asia

GENUS LEUCOPAREIA, REICHENBACH (1852)
BARNACLE GOOSE (Leucopareia leucopsis, Bechstein)
GENUS CyGwoPsis, BRANDT (1836)

SWAN-GOOSE (Cygnopsis cygnoides, Linn.)
APPENDIX ].—Mr..G. Е. Gobel on the Eggs of the Russian Geese
APPENDIX II.—Extract from the Diary of a Visit to Kolguev in 1902 of Mr. $. A. Buturlin

INDEX .

Lis! OF PLATES

FRONTISPIECE—GOOSE- LIFE ON A TURGAI LAKE.

PLATE

I.

Zz

6;

SNOW-GOOSE (Chen hyperboreus). |
E-MPEROR-GOOSE (Philacte canagica).
GREY-LAG GOOSE (Aznser anser).

WHITE-FRONTED GOOSE (Auser albifrons). =

pees WHITE-FRONTED GOOSE (Auser finmarchicus).

SUSHKIN’S GOOSE (Welanonyx neglectus).

PINK-FOOTED GOOSE (Melanonyx brachyrhynchus).
YELLOW-BILLED BEAN-GOOSE (Melanonyx arvensts).
MIDDENDORFF’S GOOSE (Melanonyx arvensis sibiricus).
BEAN-GOOSE (Melanonyx segetum).

EASTERN BEAN-GOOSE (Melanonyx segetum serrirostrts).
THICK-BILLED GOOSE (JZelanonyx mentalis).
BAR-HEADED GOOSE (Eulabeza indica).

RED-BREASTED GOOSE (Rujfibrenta ruficollis).

BRENT GOOSE (Lranta bernicla).

LIGHT-BELLIED BRENT GOOSE (Branta bernicla glaucogaster).
BLACK BRENT GOOSE (Branta bernicla nigricans).
HUTCHINS’S GOOSE (Leucoblepharon hutchins?).
BARNACLE GOOSE (Leucopareia leucopsts).

SWAN-GOOSE (Cygnopsis cygnoides).

BILLS OF GEESE.

Introduction

THE geese belong to the order Chenomorphe or Lamellirostres, the sub-order Auseres, the
family Anatide, and the sub-family Anserine. |

The latter may for our purpose, 2.е. in order to obtain а good definite idea of the geese
of Europe and Asia, be characterised as follows. Size large or medium, exceeding in the
majority of cases that of the ducks; neck long, but always shorter than the body; tarsus
either equal to, or slightly longer or shorter than, middle toe without claw; toes four, of
which the hind one (properly great toe=hallux) is short, and without skinny lobe on lower
surface. Ordinarily, in the standing position of the leg, the hind toe touches the ground with
the claw, but sometimes it does not, as for example in the black-footed geese. The three anterior
digits are connected together by entire webs; the claw of the middle toe is mostly somewhat
flattened, z.e. flatter than the claws of the remaining toes. The hard bill, covered with soft
skin, is stout, the basal portion being thick and deep (always more deep than broad), consider-
ably narrowing towards the point, where, on both mandibles, it terminates in a strong nail with
more or less sharply toothed or serrated outer edge, produced by very thickly set transverse
parallel furrows and ridges. In a few species (with black feet) the serration of the outer
edge of the nail is, however, very feebly expressed. Nail of lower mandible always flatter
than that of the upper. ‘The lower mandible is overlapped by the upper, along the edges of
which are disposed conical teeth larger and stouter than the teeth on the edges of the former,
so that these teeth are always much fewer in number on the upper than on the lower man-
dible. The teeth referred to are the sharpened ends of transverse horny lamina, separated
by narrow furrows and lying on the inner surface of the mandibles. On the palate of the
upper mandible are several longitudinal series of flat papillee, the outer series of which on
each side consists sometimes of somewhat sharp spines bent backwards. The nasal fossz
present elongated ovals, covered with skin, into which, usually near their outer angles,
open pervious nasal apertures.

Tongue fleshy, passing at its margins into a horny mass, set with reversed bristles
and spines, and tightly closing the furrows, which separate the transverse ae of the
mandibles when the beak is shut.

On the under surface of the tip of the tongue lies a very thin horny plate, in shape of
a flat nail, the sharp outer edge of which forms a projecting transparent border.1 Tarsus
covered with reticulated skin, consisting of scales for the most part square, to a less extent
pentagonal, and more rarely hexagonal. The upper surface of the digits is alone covered with
transverse skinny lamellee or scutes. Oil-gland feathered, as in whole family of Axnatidea.

The young are born with their eyes open, are covered with a thick, short down, and are
able to run, swim, and feed themselves on the day they are hatched.

1 At any rate, in those species of geese whose tongues I have had the opportunity of examining.

I B

ВЕР 15 1996

2 Geese of Europe and Asia

The ganders are devoid of the osseous or membranous swellings on the larynx
peculiar to drakes, as also of a special distinctive breeding dress, so that the plumage in both
sexes is of the same colour at all seasons of the year.

There is no coloured speculum across the wing in the geese of Europe and Asia,
but on the wrist-joint there is a prominent subcutaneous bony spine or growth, which,
however, in no single species belonging to this group develops into a true spur, as is the case
in some of the other genera of geese.

Moulting in the geese occurs once a year, and begins immediately after they have
hatched their young.!' The flight-feathers fall out all at one time, as in the ducks and
swans, making the birds completely incapable of flight for a time. Birds of the year
begin moulting during their first autumn, and, prior to this initial moulting, the feathers of
the back and shoulders, as also those of the under surface of the body, are much narrower
and more pointed than in adult birds. Apparently, during the first autumn and winter,
there occurs among the young birds a slow, gradual change of all the small feathers ;
but the first shift of the flight-feathers takes place only on reaching the age of one year,
ге. at the time when adult birds moult and change their flight-feathers. The plumage in
geese never attains its full development earlier than the third year, and in some species
probably much later—in the fifth or sixth.

The shafts of the primaries and secondaries in all the Palaearctic geese are invari-
ably white, but they always darken and become of the same colour as the webs in their
terminal part. The tail-coverts, both upper and lower, in all these geese are pure white.
Geese have from 12 to 18 tail-feathers, and, in rarer cases, as many as 20. Incubation lasts,
according to the scanty data yet available, from 25 to 28 days.

Geese pair for life, z.e. they are genuine monogamists, and both parents show equal
solicitude for their progeny, although the gander does not, as was formerly thought, take part
in the brooding. From individual pairs or families of geese (broods) are usually formed
considerable flocks, the members of which carry out their wanderings and migrations together.

Owing to their legs being shifted less backward, and, generally, to a greater length of
tarsus, geese are far more agile, walk and run more freely, than ducks, swans, or smews
(Mergus). This is undoubtedly connected with their mode of life, since geese pass much
more time on land than on the water. |

The voice of the geese is loud, sonorous, and of a different character from that of
the ducks, and is very truly expressed by the terms cack/e or gagg/e, in contradistinction to
the guacké of the ducks.

The chief food of geese consists of all kinds of plants’ (especially grasses and water-
weeds), their seeds, and sometimes roots; but a few species, living exclusively on the
sea-shores, sometimes also feed on small molluscs and other aquatic animals, this being at
once betrayed in the taste of their flesh. There is, however, no doubt that the young in
down of the geese feed to a considerable degree on animal food—in the shape of various
insects, their larvze, small snails, crustaceans, fish, frog-spawn, etc.

The geese in general enjoy great longevity; it is authentically known, for example,
that one American species—Leucoblepharon canadensis—lives to a hundred years and more.
In France there was lately living a domesticated goose which was 35 years old, and
continued till that age to annually lay eggs and hatch her offspring.? Certain other species

1 The males, it is to be noted, begin to moult somewhat sooner than the females.
2 I have not been able to ascertain whether this goose is still alive.

Introduction 3

of wild geese have also lived in captivity from 26 to 30 years, so that, on the whole, there
is no ground for scepticism as to their longevity.

In distinguishing geese, as we shall see in the present work, great importance
attaches to the structure, dimensions, and colouring of the bill, and also to the colouring of
certain unfeathered parts of the body, such as the eyelids and legs. Often among several
nearly related species the form, dimensions, and colouring of the bills are almost the sole
certain distinctive characteristics ; although it must be borne in mind that such character-
istics must always be treated with extreme caution and attention, or otherwise it is easy to
fall into serious mistakes. I will try to explain this in somewhat greater detail.

In regard to the dimensions of the bills, it must first of all be remembered that
geese, as we have already seen, are very long-lived, and at the same time it is absolutely
incontestable that with age the bill tends to become continually longer and more
massive, so that in very old and large specimens it will considerably exceed in size that
of younger, although fully mature, birds of the same species. Once such increase in the
dimensions of the bill as a consequence of age is admitted, it is evident that the two or three
odd millimetres in excess of the dimensions, which serve as the normal measure for the
given species, must not be taken as a sufficient character to assign such exceptional examples
to distinct sub-species or races, in the absence of any other more weighty reasons. Such
differences in the dimensions will, indeed, only show that the generally accepted standards
for the various species have been quoted by ornithologists on the basis of measurements
of an insufficient number of individuals, among which, it is quite possible, there did not
occur any old or very aged specimens. And, if we refer to collections of skins in various
museums, in the majority of cases we shall find the material far from adequate to clear up
the question of the normal limits of the size of the bill in all the representatives of each
species,—limits the determination of which is extremely desirable. Moreover, for the most
part, it is the more youthful and less shy rather than the very old, very wary, and experienced
birds that fall into the hands of collectors, so that short-billed specimens are the most
common. Asa rule, it may be said that skins only in rare cases enable us to judge of the
age of geese. All that one can hope for, in examining the majority of collections of skins, is
to learn the sex of the bird from the label, and, further, whether the skin belonged to a young
or to an adult bird. Sometimes it happens that, among skins of ordinary size (¢.e. of the
dimensions most frequently met with), there occur specimens the measurements of whose bills
far exceed the rest; but there is no doubt that such examples are nothing more than large, aged
representatives of the same species, which, as already said, fall to the gun of the fowler much
more seldom than younger birds. The colouring of the bill also plays a very great part in
distinguishing different species, or varieties of one and the same species. But here there is
need for still greater caution than when determining geese by the structure of the bill, as it
must be remembered that in dry skins the colouring of the soft-parts is subject to consider-
able changes. Pink, pale or dark flesh-tints alter by fading past recognition, a fact I shall
have occasion to speak of in more detail when describing the various species of geese. The
intensity in the colouring of rosy bills, as Dr. Sushkin informs me, speaking of the ordinary
and lesser white-fronted goose, varies, and, apparently, is connected with the afflux and efflux
of blood. Undoubtedly, the same phenomena occur in other species, and particularly in the
grey-lag goose.

Apart from this, even a few hours after the death of the bird, some of the delicate hues,
as for example rose or light flesh-tints, become for the most part waxy yellow. In the case

4 Geese of Europe and Asia

of head-wounds, there not unfrequently occur subcutaneous extravasation and infiltration
of blood, turning the colouring from light to dark, from rosy to deep crimson, and so
on. ‘This I observed more than once in lesser white-fronted geese and swans killed in my
presence. Of the latter it happened that то to 15 birds were shot in a day, and I noticed that
on the following morning the lemon-yellow bills in some specimens (with injured heads)
assumed an orange or red tinge; and some such number I had occasion to see and examine
not once only but several times, as my fellow-sportsmen and I were then eager in our
pursuit of these birds, of which we killed many. I greatly regret that I did not then make
coloured sketches of several bills of freshly killed swans; but, unfortunately, I could not
then foresee that I should want this information in writing the present book.

Whether food has any influence on the colouring of the soft-parts in geese, is
a question which requires careful investigation. Probably the answer should be in the
affirmative, and this is the reason, it seems to me, why some English sporting ornithologists
affirm that, in the case of pink-footed geese (Welanonyx brachyrhynchus) living and breeding
in captivity, there have been specimens alike with normally coloured rosy or flesh-tinted
soft-parts, and others with these tinged orange, as in the common bean-goose. Sir R. Payne
Gallwey even states that he has shot perfectly wild М. dbvachyrhynchus with orange bills and
feet, a point I shall discuss more at length in the article on that species.

It thus seems difficult to avoid supposing that such variations in the colours of the
soft-parts are dependent on the influence of food. The deposit of subcutaneous fat also
must here play no small part, a circumstance I shall discuss in greater detail in the articles
on the grey-lag and the white-fronted goose.

Indeed, since we know that certain foods affect the colouring of the plumage in other
birds (for instance the familiar fact of the influence of cayenne pepper on canaries), it is
quite reasonable to suppose that a certain food may, in no less measure, influence the colour-
ing of the soft-parts of geese. Moreover, it should not be lost sight of that many
Lamellirostres exhibit purely individual differences in the colouring of both the plumage
and the soft-parts, аз 1 have more than once had occasion to state in my Ducks of Russia
(vede articles on Mallard, Teal, etc.).

One other circumstance is very important in connection with the difficulty of arriving
at final conclusions in regard to the colouring of the soft-parts in the birds at present under
consideration, namely, that all authors by no means define the colours in the same manner.

“Ре gustibus et coloribus non disputandum,” as the saying has it; and it constantly
happens that what is considered by one author as yellow, is taken by another for orange,
and so оп. Therefore, in descriptions of one and the same species, we not seldom meet in
different authors very dissimilar determinations of the colours of the soft-parts. I insist
specially on this, as I have myself had no little trouble in unravelling the causes of the con-
tradictory descriptions of the soft-parts to be met with in even very careful authors; and I
desire to take the opportunity of pointing out the necessity when determining geese, whether
freshly killed birds or their dry skins, of being extremely careful in this respect. With this
object I asked Mr. Frohawk, who has made the drawings in the present work with such
truth to Nature, to direct particular attention to the colouring of the soft-parts, and I can
guarantee that the bills in these drawings are presented by the artist in their xorma/
colouring with extraordinary exactitude. When I was unable to give precise indications,
Мг. Frohawk scrupulously followed the description of the most competent observers, who
had noted the colouring from perfectly fresh individuals.

Introduction 5

Geese attain the adult colouring of the soft-parts (and also of the plumage) ot earlier
than at the age of 3 or 4 years, perhaps even later. During the first 2 or 3 years, some of the
light or bright colours of their soft-parts do not attain that intensity which they do in 5- or
6-year-old birds. It is still more probable that, from the age of 6 to that of то years, the
colours become yet purer and brighter. Hence it is quite possible that, partly for this reason,
we meet with such diversity of description among different authors. It must also be
remembered that some species of geese very rarely come into the hands of naturalists in
the fresh state (z.e. freshly shot), while others never do so.

I consider all this so essential that I shall lay great stress on the colouring of the
soft-parts when describing the Various species, while it will undoubtedly be necessary to
repeat more than once the considerations set forth above, for which I ask the reader’s
indulgence beforehand.

From immemorial times, the opinion has been held that geese are extremely stupid
birds. On the other hand, simultaneously with this unflattering view of their intelligence,
all nations from the earliest ages have recognised the extraordinary wariness and watch-
fulness of these birds. How then are these two conceptions, so absolutely contradictory to one
another, to be reconciled? The solution, it seems to me, is to be found in the fact that these
opinions refer to perfectly distinct birds, namely, the former to domestic and the latter to
wild birds. Indeed, the domestic goose, devoid of all initiative, all independence in the
manifestation of its natural capacities, is apparently a thoroughly stupid creature, the more so
that its head, with comparatively small eyes, has a far from intelligent expression. Look at
a great flock of fat domestic geese, being driven by a boy with a switch in his hand, or by
a little girl hardly taller than the birds themselves,—it is difficult to find any symptoms of
intelligence in such a flock. But are wild geese like this? On the contrary, they show
extreme wariness, acuteness, and curiosity. Their caution is most notable; and there is no
game more difficult for the sportsman to approach than geese, excluding of course young
and inexperienced birds that have not yet come into contact with their enemies.

Geese breed in uninhabited and usually open situations difficult of access. There
they nest, in the majority of cases, in large parties or colonies. Nesting geese may be met
with in thousands and tens of thousands in certain extensive water-basins, in the tundras,
_etc.; but it must not be thought that their nests are crowded, or placed very near together:
on the contrary, nesting geese occupy suitable spots in extensive and undisturbed open areas.
After being hatched, the young, together with the old birds, while still moulting, gather into
large parties and, if necessary, perform their wanderings on foot from one likely spot to
another in company. If, however, they meet on the way their most dangerous foe—man,
heavy is the penalty the geese have to pay for the encounter. This helplessness of moulting
geese has long been known, and in such cases the birds are exterminated ex masse.
Happily, there are not many inhabitants in the chief breeding-grounds, where millions of
geese build their nests; otherwise there would be a rapid diminution in the hordes of
these birds which rejoice the soul of the fowler and lover of Nature with their appearance
and cackle during their spring and autumn flights.

Geese afford one of the most difficult kinds of fowling. However cunning man may
be, he finds it extremely difficult to over-reach these wary birds, and in some places one may
see them in hundreds of thousands for several weeks at a stretch without the possibility
of securing a single specimen. This is especially the case in thickly populated regions,
where the geese already know that danger may threaten them.

6 Geese of Europe and Asia

The flesh of geese in the majority of cases has a good flavour, and only very lean or
very old birds have tough and dry flesh. But the same thing happens at times with geese
as with ducks, namely, that from certain food their flesh becomes simply nauseous, owing
to a peculiar fishy smell. It is probably mainly certain kinds of molluscs which are the
cause of this unpleasant odour and taste.

Many tribes of the far north dry the bodies of geese without salt, and regard them
prepared in this way as a great delicacy.

The Lamuts consider the raw webs of geese very good eating, as is stated by Baron
Е. Toll in the Memoirs of the Imp. Russ. Geogr. Soc. vol. хххи. 1897.

Of the different ways of cooking geese, I cannot, unfortunately, say anything, since
I have had little opportunity to hear, read, or learn much on the subject.

Explanations.

The measurements of the length of the bill given in this work were made along the —
culmen (the straight line from the middle of the base of the upper mandible to the end of
its nail).

By the expression ‘‘greatest depth of lower mandible” must be understood the
greatest visible thickness of the latter from the side, with the bill shut tight by pressing
together the nails of the mandibles with the fingers.

Soft or naked areas include all the unfeathered parts of the bird, such as bill, inner
part of the eyelids, eyes, tarsus, and the feet with their webs. The hind toe, corresponding
to the great toe, is sometimes called the hallux.

The sign ¢ denotes the male, the sign ¢ the female.

In the present work I attach very little importance to the measurements given by
authors of the tarsus and median digit. This is because, in the majority of cases, I have
been unable to establish any constant relation between these dimensions, or between these
and the other dimensions of the bird. It is very possible that, in time, with incomparably
more material, even these relations between the length of the tarsus and the median digit
will afford good distinctive characters, but so far this is not the case.

KEY TO GENERA, SPECIES, AND SUB-SPECIES

т (42) Feathering of forehead projects into base of bill in the form of an
arch or promontory rounded at the end.

2 (31) Feathering of forehead forms a regular arch; legs red, pink,
or yellow (in young birds with more or less admixture of
grey), but not black. Feathering at sides of neck forms longi-
tudinal tufts, separated by deep furrows. Hind toe in walking
touches ground with claw.

3 (6) Whole tail white, in young birds with faint grey tinge. Black
streak stretches above edge of upper mandible and below edge
of lower from gape. Whole feathering, except black primaries,
white (adult bird) or light grey (young birds); legs and bill

red (adult) or grey (young birds). Genus Chen, Boie (1822).
4 (5) Culmen 50-58 mm. (=1.96-2.28 in.); wing 370-435 mm.

(=14.50-17.10 in.). С. hyperboreus, Pallas.
5 (4) Culmen 63-70 mm. (=2.48-2.75 in.); wing 440-445 mm.

(= 17.30-17.50 in.). С. nivalis, Forster.

6 (3) Tail never wholly white; no black streaks along edges of
mandibles. White and pale grey are not prevailing tints in
plumage. |
7 (8) Тай, terminal half white, basal slate-colour. Length of nail оп
upper mandible contained in total length of culmen con-
siderably less than three times. Outer half or only outer
margin of upper nail dark-coloured. Genus Philacte, Bannister (1870).
Top and sides of head and back of neck white,’ in sharp
contrast to dark lower part of head and foreneck (adult), or
head and neck slate-grey mottled with white (young birds).
Bill 35-42 mm. (1.37-1.65 in.); wing 350-400 mm. (=13.70—
15.70 in.). P. canagica, Sevastianov.
8 (7) Tail brown, but tail-feathers with white edgings and tips. |
Length of nail on upper mandible included at least three times
in total length of culmen. |
9 (30) Neck all round almost uniform grey-brown, only slightly darker
behind. White not prevailing colour on head.
то (15) Whole bill light, from whitish, flesh-coloured, and pink, to
orange, with white nail (adult) or grey-fleshy tinge with grey

SS ee ee ee Е

1 Here the white is often coloured with a more or less intense yellow or rusty (sometimes amber-coloured) tinge, as for example

in the specimen figured.

7

8 Geese of Europe and Asia

or also brown nail (young birds). On belly of adults a greater

or less number of transverse brown or black patches (some-

times confluent or even covering greater part of belly). Genus Anser, Brisson (1760).
тт (12) Length of culmen not less than 60 mm. (= 2.36 in.); rump and

margin of wing pale ashen grey. Legs flesh or roseate with-

out orange tint. Ситеп* 61-72 mm. (= 2.40-2.83 in.) ; wing

400—500 mm, (= 15.70-19.60 in.). A. anser, Linnzus.
12 (тг) Culmen less than бо mm. (= 2.36 ш.)*; rump dark slaty brown ;

legs orange or yellow, rarely with roseate tinge; edge of wing

dark brownish grey. Around base of upper mandible lies a

broad white band (adult) or narrow black margin, in which are

sometimes scattered separate white featherlets (young birds).
13 (14) Culmen not less than 4o mm. (=1.57 in.). When bill is shut,

almost all teeth of upper mandible visible from without.

Around eye absence of well-marked yellow ring, formed by

ceroma. In adult, white spot on forehead does not go farther

back than line joining anterior angles of eyes, while usually

falling far short of the same.

Culmen 40-56 mm. (= 1.57—2.20 in.); wing 375-435 mm.

(=14.70-17.10 in.). Length of nail on upper mandible

included more than three times in total length of culmen. A. albtfrons, Scopoli.
14 (13) Culmen less than 38 mm. (=1.49 in.). When bill is shut, teeth

of upper mandible not visible from without or noticeable only

near gape.* Ceroma forms somewhat swollen yellow ring

around eyes. In adult, white space projects backward over fore-

head considerably beyond line joining anterior angles of eyes,

but rarely reaches line joining their posterior angles.

Culmen 29-374 mm. (=1.40-1.47 in.); wing 345-395 mm.

(=12.60-15.50 in.) Length of nail on upper mandible

included three times in total length of culmen. A. finmarchicus, Gunner.
15 (10) Basal half of upper mandible or parts of it, culmen and nails of

both mandibles, always black; light parts of bill yellow (to

orange inclusive) or pink to dark flesh or reddish. In young

birds, black colouring on bill always prevails over light.

Never any black patches on the belly. Genus Melanonyx, Buturlin (1901).
16 (29) Colouring of light parts of bill and legs identical.
17 (20) Light parts of bill and leg pink or flesh coloured.
18 (19) Margin of wing dark grey-brown; culmen 55—63 mm. (= 2.16-

2.48 in.); wing 450-488 mm. (= 17.70-19.20 in.). И. negtlectus, Sushkin.
19 (18) Margin of wing bluish ashen grey; culmen 42-48 mm. (1.65—

1.88 in.); wing about 400 mm. (=15.70 in.) (from lack of

material, | cannot give more definite limits for the variation in |

the length of the wing). М. brachyrhynchus, Baillon.
20 (17) Ordinarily, light parts on bill and leg yellow or orange-yellow

1 Sometimes, as stated by undoubted authorities, the bill in this species is also orange-coloured, which in such case must certainly
be dependent on a considerable layer of subcutaneous fat, whereof I shall have occasion to speak in greater detail when describing this
species.

2 Personally I have not happened to see an example with a bill longer than 56 mm. (2.20 in.), but among American specimens,
distinguished by the name A. aldifrons gambelt, bills sometimes occur with culmen reaching 60 mm, (2.36 in.).

. 8 However, in dry skins, in which the skin at the edges of the upper mandible has become somewhat raised or warped in the process
of drying, the teeth are visible from without, but this is an abnormal phenomenon.

Key to Genera, Species, and Sub-Species 9

(adult), but, apparently as an exception, this colour sometimes
assumes on bill a red tinge.
21 (24) Length of nail on upper mandible included in total length of
culmen more than four times in fully adult birds, or four
times in younger specimens.
22 (23) Culmen 55-72 mm. (= 2.16-2.83 in.); greatest depth (thickness)
of visible portion of lower mandible, with bill shut, 6-84 mm.
(=.23-.33 in.) Prevailing colour on bill (in adults) yellow
(or orange), in young birds black.
Around base of upper mandible on feathering lies a white
band, absent only in young and very old individuals. М. arvensis, Brehm.
23 (22) Culmen 74-83 mm. (= 2.91—3.26 in.); greatest depth (thickness)
of visible portion of lower mandible, with bill shut, 9-12 mm.
(=.35-.47 in.). Yellow (orange) colouring concentrated on ter-
minal portion of bill in form of ring embracing both mandibles.
Around base of upper mandible no white feathering. И. arvensis stbiricus, Alphéraky.
24 (21) Length of nail of upper mandible included in total length of
culmen considerably less than four times.
25 (28) Yellow (orange) colouring concentrated on anterior half of bill;
no white feathering along base of upper mandible; sometimes
white patch occurs on chin, or even whole chin is white.
26 (27) Culmen 48-61 mm. (= 1.88—2.40 in.); greatest depth of lower
mandible, with shut bill, 74-11 mm. (=.29-.43 in.); wing
425—450 mm. (= 16.70-17.70 in.). | И. segetum, Gmelin.
27 (26) Culmen 62—72 mm. (= 2.44~2.83 in.); greatest depth (thickness)
of lower mandible, visible with shut bill, 10-12 mm. (=.39-
.47 in.); wing 450-475 mm. (= 17.7-18.7 in.). И. segetum serrirostris, Swinhoe.
28 (25) Yellow colouring extends from terminal portion of bill under
nares and along edge of upper mandible in irregular patches.
Length of bill 68—78 mm. (= 2.67—2.95 in.); greatest depth of
lower mandible, with bill shut, 13-16 mm. (=.51-.63 in.).
Wing 495-516 mm. (= 19.40-20.30 in.). М. segetum mentalis, Oates.’
29 (16) Colouring of light portions of bill and legs unlike; on bill, pink
(red ?), on legs, orange. Culmen 64 mm. Е:
(Doubtful species. ) И. ? carnetrostris, Buturlin
30 (9) Prevailing colouring of head white. Along each side of dark (spectes dubta).
neck stretches a broad white band. Bill weak, entirely light
except black nails, of which upper included in total length of
culmen not less than four times. Genus Eulabeia, Reichenbach (1852).
Prevailing colour of head white, with two black transverse
bars, anterior one of which reaches to eyes (adult birds), or
with dark brown occiput and nape (young birds). General
colouring ochreous light grey ; rump bluish cinereous grey.
Culmen 483-584 mm. (= 1.9~-2.4 in.). Е. ndica, Latham.
31 (2) Feathering of forehead projects into base of bill in an abrupt arc
or promontory. Legs at all ages black (of varying intensity) ;
bill entirely black. Feathering at sides of neck forms scarcely
any sharply defined longitudinal tufts, or latter feebly expressed.

— 1 J now no longer doubt that the 4. mentalis described by Oates is founded on very large old specimens of the eastern variety

of the bean-goose.
ie

ТО

2153)

33 (32)

=

34 (39

35 (38)

6 (37)
37 (36)

38 (35)

—

39 (34

40 (41)

41 (40)

Geese of Europe and Asia

Claw of posterior digit (hallux) does not touch ground in

walking.
Whole (or almost whole) of chin feathered. Bill very small,

with very convex nail on upper mandible. Teeth not visible

with bill shut. Tail in adult black; in young birds, with

narrow white tips to the feathers.
Colouring consists of following tints: black, rufous, and white.

Genus Rufibrenta, Bonaparte (1856).

Foreneck, upper breast, and aural region of a rufous chestnut

colour, and bordered with white and, in places (on the breast),

black stripes (adult), or foreneck and upper breast rufescent,

and aural region with black and white mottling (young birds) ;

across blackish wing, at ends of greater coverts, two white

or whitish belts.
Culmen 23-25 mm. (=.90-.98 in.); wing 350-360 mm.

( = 13.17-14.10 in.). < А. ruficollis, Pallas.
Upper half of chin not feathered. No chestnut or rufous colour-

ing in feathering; breast black.
Whole head black. Upper and lower tail-coverts always ie

and reach tip of tail-feathers. Genus Branta, Scopoli (1769).
In adults, a white patch on each side of neck, consisting of white

streaks, in young birds either wanting or only traces. Now

and then, in adults, these spots touch in front.
Belly slate-grey ; culmen 30-38 mm. (=1.20-1.50 in.); wing

312—345 mm. (= 12.30-13.60 in.). В. bernicla, Linnzus.
Belly pearly greyish or ochreous white. Otherwise as in type
form. В. bernicla glaucogaster, Brehm.

In adults, white patches on neck always widely separated on

front, and often on hind surface of neck. In young birds, this

collar either absent or feebly developed. Whole feathering of

adults darker, and belly as black as breast. Dimensions as in

last. Б. bernicla nigricans, Lawrence.
Upper and under tail-coverts do not reach tips of tail-feathers.

Head partly white.
Neck long; forehead black. On black head, only hind part of

cheeks and aural region white. These spots often confluent

on throat, but sometimes perfectly distinct.' On feather-

ing of body and wings no*sub-terminal black spots. Genus Leucoblepharon, Baird
Bill 3043-485 mm. (=1.20-1.90 ‘in.); wing 373-449 mm. (1858).
(= 14.75-17.75 in.). Г. hutchinst, Rich. & Swains.

Neck short; forehead, with exception of black streak at base of

upper mandible, white. On feathers of back, scapulars, and

wing-coverts sub-terminal black crescentic stripes (adults), or

wide black bands (young birds). Genus Leucopareia, Reichenbach
Greater part of head white; lores, occiput, nape of neck, and (1852).

streak at base of upper mandible on top of forehead—black.

General colouring of body pale ashen grey.
Culmen 28—36.3 mm. (=1.10-1.43 in.); wing 378-429 mm.

(= 14.90-16.80 in.). | Г. leucopsts, Bechstein.

} T suspect that this depends on the age of the birds, but I have no data to decide this question,

Key to Genera, Species, and Sub-Species i

42 (1) Feathering of forehead does not project into base of upper
mandible. Base of upper mandible slightly swollen and
wrinkled. Huge bill wholly black. Tarsus considerably
shorter than middle toe without claw; feet orange. Genus Cygnopsis, Brandt (1836).
Over back of neck stretches coffee-brown bar. Foreneck |
whitish. Along base of upper mandible runs narrow white
stripe, often with strong rusty tinge (adults); in young birds,
only traces of this white stripe, and bill much shorter.
Bill along culmen (adults) 75-100 mm. (=2.95-3.93 in.);
wing 405-470 mm. (= 15.90-18.50 in.). С. cygnotdes, Linnzeus.

In using this Key the reader must understand that cross-references are the essential feature. For
instance, when studying No. т (42) he must refer for comparison to No. 42 (1). In this instance he will
find that in No. 1 ¢he frontal angle forms an arch, etc. ; but on turning to No. 42 (т), it will be seen that
the frontal angle does not form an arch. Again, taking No. 2 (31), it will be seen that the feet are of
different colours, but xever её; while under No. 31 (2), it will be seen that the feet are always black.

Genus Chen, Boie (1822)

WHOLE tail white or with feeble greyish tint (in young birds). Adult pure white,
except black primaries; plumage of young birds light grey. Along each edge of lower
and upper mandibles a black stripe. Legs and bill red in adult, and grey in young.

THE SNOW-GOOSE

CHEN HYPERBOREUS, PALLAS
Pate

English.—Szow-Goose; Amer.—White Brant; White Brand (Carolina); Wavey; Wae-
Wae; Wevor; Mexican Goose ; Red Goose (Wilson); Fish Brant; Texas Goose.

Russian—Lely gus; snezhny gus; polyarny and severny gus (Vavilov); maly bely gus
(Buturlin).

Tatar—Kuba-gaz (on Caspian).'

Yakut— Yurgun-kaz (white goose).

Ostyak (Berezovst)— Ungula-khoteng (teste Pallas, ‘dumb swan”).

Lamut—Gz/¢a/2.

Samoyed— Yuraki-Varakh.

Kamchadal—Khynka.

Uka—Kezshuash (Kamchatka).

Japanese—Hakugan.

French.—Chen hyperboré; Ore des Esquimaux ; Ote de neige.

German.—Schuee Gans; Weisse Gans; Nord-gans; Polar Gans.

Anser hyperboreus, Pallas, Spic. Zool., vi. р. 25 (1767); 24, Zoogr. Ross.-As.,, ii. р. 227, pl. 65 (1811); Kessler,
Russk. Orn., р. 372 (1848); Menzbier, Pt. Ross., i. р. 722 (1895); zd, Prom. Pt. Ross. i Kavk., р. 459,
pl. 129 (1902); Buturlin, Tabl. Орг. Plast. (“ Psov. i Ruzh, Okh.,” 1900); 24., зераг., рр. 5 and 6; zd,
Dikie Gusi Rossiisk. Imp. (“ Psov. i Ruzh. ОКБ.” 1901, Feb., Ap.) ; 24, separ., р. 9; 24., Sinopt. tabl. ОКВ.
Pi Ross. Imp. p.-42 (1901); Vablonsky, “Ри i ОБЬ” 1891 (vii.), р. 58 (Minus. Yenis. g.) ;
Radde, Ornis Самс. р. 446 (1884); Buturlin, “Prir. i ОКБ.” 1896 (eb, Mar.) о, “ Psov.- 1 uz.
Okh.,” 1899 (Nov.); Menzbier, “Prir. i ОКВ.” 1898 (Aug.) ; Sabancyev, Bull. Soc. Mosc. 1871, ii. ; М,
“Zhurn. Imp. Obshch. ОКВ.” 1874 (vii), р. 14; 74, Ukaz. Kn. i St. Okh. i Zool. Cod., р. 455 (1883);
Seebohm, Ibis, 1844, p. 32 (Japan); Palmen, Bidr. Sibirisk Ishafsk. Fogelf. Véga Ехр., р. 417; Finsch,
Verh, z.-b. Ges. Wien, 1879, s. 260; Collett, Ornith. Jahrb., 1890, i. p. 37.

Anas hyperboreus, Sevast., in note to р. 474 “ Opisanie Kamchatki,” Krasheninnikov (1818).

' Dr. С. Т. Radde explains the name Auéa-gaz, given to this goose near Leukoran, by the fact that it migrates thither from the
north, in the direction from Kuba, lying to the north of Leukoran.

[2

Snow-Goose iy

Anas hyperborea, Gmelin, Syst. Nat., И. р. 504 (1788).

Chen hyberborea, Boie, Isis, 1822, р. 563; Taczanowski, Faune Orn. Sib. Or., р. 1086 (1893); Ridgway, Man.
М. Am. Birds, р. 115 (1887); Stejneger, Orn. Expl. Comm. Isl. and Kamtsch., р. 317 (1885).

Chen hyperboreus, Bonaparte, Comp. List, р. 55 (1838); Zarndny, Orn. Е. Orenb. Кг., р. 225 (1888); 24,
Dopoln. К Orn. Е. Orenb. kr., р. 107 (1897); Collett, Orn. Jahrb. 1. р. 137 (1830); Stejneger, Bull.
U.S. Nat. Mus., x. №. 19, р. 317 (1885); 24. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus, x. р. 135 (1887) (Bering Isl.) ;
Baird and Ridgway, Water-Birds М. Am., 1. р. 430 (ра’йт) (1864); Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus.,
xxvii. p. 84 (1895); Macpherson, History of Fowling, 1897, p. 218.

Chionochen hyperboreus, Reichenbach, Av. Syst. Nat., p. 1х. (1851).

Chenalopex hyperboreus, Lichtenstein, Nomencl. Av., р. тот (1854).

Anser albatus, Cass., Proc. Ac. Philad. 1856, p. 41.

Chen albatus, Elliot, New and Unfig. Birds М. Am., ti. pl. 42 (1867).

Anser hyperboreus, var. albatus, Coues, Key №. Am. Birds, р. 282, No. 486, а (1872).

Chen hyperboreus albatus, Ridgway, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 1880, p. 202.

? Maly lebed, Dombrowski, “ Okhot. Gaz.,” 1897, р. 228 (Bukhta Salmonchu Tatarskago proliva).

РР Cygnus (Coscoroba) davidi, Swinhoe, Proc. Zool. Soc. L., 1870, р. 430.

P? Cygnus аа, Swinhoe, Proc. Zool. Soc. L., 1871, p. 416 (поп Cygnus дала, Gig]. & Salv., Proc. Zool. Soc. L.,
1887, р. 580, pl. Ш. = Cygn. dewickz).

ADULT Втво$ OF Вотн SEXES

Whole plumage, with exception of primaries, their coverts and bastard wing, snowy
white ; the head only has often a rusty tinge of varying intensity, such as is commonly met
with in many aquatic birds. Primary wing-feathers black (except white shafts, gradually
passing into greyish towards the base of the feathers); their coverts, as also alula, of a pale
ashen grey (hoary). Under side of wings and axillaries white. Bill, with very concave
arched edges of upper mandible, lilac red or dark red with whitish or yellowish nails; but
sometimes the bill is yellowish pink, passing on nasal fossa, around nares, into bright red;
lower mandible usually somewhat lighter and more lilac-coloured than upper. Above the
edge of upper and under edge of lower mandible, from gape to tip, run coal-black
stripes, attaining their greatest width in the middle. These black stripes give the bill a
sneering expression, and are, in my opinion, so characteristic of representatives of the genus
Chen that their absence alone, were there even no other distinctive characters, would be
perfectly sufficient to justify the removal from this genus of the species vossz, for which
Mr. Elliot in 1868 established the genus Hlexanthemofps.

Feet lilac or orange-red, with black claws; soles either dingy yellowish or pale
yellow. Iris dark brown. Eyelids sometimes dark red, sometimes pale greenish. The
female, as in all geese, is somewhat smaller and more slender than the male.

In the vast majority of cases 16 tail-feathers, but rarely 18.

Total length . ; ; 23—29 in. (= 584—736 mm.)
Wing : 14.5-17 in. (= 368—431 mm.)
Culmen ; ; 1.95—3.3 in. (= 49.5—58.4 mm.)
Tarsus . . 2,8-3.25 in. (= 71.1—-82.5 mm.)

Weight apparently never exceeding 6, and usually somewhat less than 5 Russian 5.

YOUNG BIRDS

Top of head, hind neck, and upper surface of body pale greyish, feathers of back
with lighter edges. Upper wing-coverts and tertiaries dark grey with broad white edgings ;
secondaries with grey mottlings, bordered with white. Primaries black, passing towards base

14 Geese of Europe and Asia

into greyish ; their coverts and winglet light ashen grey. Under side of wing and axillaries
greyish white. Rump, upper and lower tail-coverts, and whole under side of body, pure
white; breast and tail white with greyish tint. On head, usually a rusty tinge, thickest on
the fore part. Bill and feet dark grey or brownish, often with greenish or olive tint. Black
stripes along edges of mandibles as in adult birds.

The young birds take not less than four years to gain the adult plumage (although
it is stated that this sometimes occupies a still longer period), the birds gradually whitening
with each moult.

In regard to the young in down there is a lack of information.

I therefore pass on to discuss the question as to what species or what form of snow-
goose—whether the Auser hyperboreus of Pallas, or the larger Chen nivalis of Forster—
occurs in North-Eastern Europe, especially Russia. To decide this is at present not only
difficult but impossible, since apparently not a single specimen of snow-goose killed in
Russia exists in any museum.

Consequently there is no possibility of deciding this question, and one is compelled,
nolens volens, to content oneself with conjectures and conclusions, which may be proved
erroneous by the first specimens which come into the hands of naturalists. From the
statement that in Japan both forms occur, 7.e. the lesser and greater (Chen hyperboreus
and wzvalis), the conclusion might be drawn that both are met with also in Eastern
Europe, but the very occurrence of both these geese in Japan must, for the present, be
accepted with caution.

The sole specimen from Yokohama (killed March 5, 1882), preserved in the Zoological
Museum at St. Petersburg, belongs to Chen hyferboreus.

Total length ; ; РИ —= 17-25 ВЫ.)
Wing . ; ; 16.7 in. (=425 mm.)
Culmen , ’ : 1.96 in. (= 50 mm.)
Tarsus 5 : ; 2.55 in. (=65 mm.)

Further, it must be borne in mind that the specific distinctness of these two geese
is apparently still far from being finally settled. For instance, such a well-known sports-
man as Mr. Leffingwell,’ in his article on geese (Shooting on Upland, Marsh, and Stream,
Chicago, 1890, p. 314), writes that the great and small snow-geese gradually pass into each
other by an uninterrupted series of forms which are very confusing; in other words, it
is often difficult to know to which of these forms to refer specimens. The surmise,
expressed by Mr. Buturlin, that it is Chen nivalis, and not С. hyperboreus, which occurs in
Russia, 1s founded only on the apparently greater size of specimens noted by the few
sportsmen who have chanced to see snow-geese in Russia, and consequently is based
chiefly on probability.

Even this apparent probability, in my opinion, is considerably shaken by the
following considerations.

It must, firstly, be remembered that all white birds? seen during flight appear larger
than birds of the same size but of a dark colour.

Further, although Chen nivalis? is considerably bigger than Chen hypferboreus, this

1 Author of several works on the water-fowl of North America.
2 And in general all white objects in Nature,

3 | |
This we shall see farther on, when I give the dimensions and certain data on this form.

Snow-Goose Es

difference is scarcely sufficient to enable observers to recognise the bird on the wing, and
particularly in the case of birds flying like geese, z.e. at a considerable distance from the
observer.

Again, the geographical distribution of snow-geese in North America, so far as
ascertained, is to a certain extent against Mr. Buturlin’s supposition. Thus, it is known that
in the western part of North America only the lesser snow-goose, 7.e. Chen hyperboreus, is
found, while on the eastern side we have Chen nivalis. Accordingly, in order that Chen
nivalis should be the bird which has been observed in Russia, as ¢.g. in the Governments of
Kiev, Orenburg, and on the Caspian, it must be assumed either that East American birds
migrate thither, or that Chen nivalis breeds in some part of Siberia. In the latter case,
there would be the remarkable circumstance that the distribution of the form breeding in
_ Siberia and in Eastern America is interrupted in Western America and replaced by another
form, namely, the lesser snow-goose. This would be a distributional feature without
parallel in the animal world of the Northern Hemisphere.

I think, therefore, that Mr. Buturlin’s supposition is hardly probable, although, in
the absence of full information, it cannot be definitely contradicted. Accordingly, for the
present, we must retain for the snow-goose of Russia the name Ayperboreus, given by Pallas,
and accepted by all ornithologists.

(GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

We have only the following scanty information with regard to the geographical dis-
tribution of the snow-goose in Eastern Europe, and this information is of such a kind that
it is impossible to give it full reliance. Pallas says: ‘‘ Together with the black brant, it
appears in spring in large numbers in the valley of the Lena, whence on the melting of
the ice it probably proceeds to Polar lands not yet explored.” According to the same
authority, these birds are very abundant around the Yana, so much so that men ава. dogs
feed on them the whole winter. ‘‘ More rarely,” he continues, ‘they occur near the Kolyma
and along the Indigirka. They are very rare in Kamchatka along the Yurak shore and at
the mouths of the Obi, where, as well as on Taimyr, they are met with on the promontories
of the continent extending into the Arctic Ocean.”

Evidently Pallas wrote this mainly from hearsay; but there is no doubt that, from
‘the Lena on the east, along the shores of the Arctic Ocean and on the adjacent islands,
the snow-goose is to be met with. According to Krasheninnikov, in Kamchatka “the
snow-goose is especially rare. On the contrary, in the Northern Sea, about the Kolyma
and other rivers, there are so many that the hunters kill a vast number, on which
account the very best down is brought to Irkutsk from those places. The geese are
caught when they are moulting, in a somewhat curious manner. In the spots to which
the geese most resort are built huts with open doors. In the evening the hunter puts
on a white shirt or shuba, and having stolen upon the flock, shows himself, and then
creeps into the hut, upon which all the geese follow, and enter the hut, while the hunter,
having passed through, closes the other door and, running to the other side, kills all the
geese in the hut.”

Personally, I am of the opinion that snow-geese breed in Arctic Eastern Siberia and
on the adjacent islands in considerable numbers, and that they migrate thence mainly to
the Pacific shore to winter, and that only an insignificant proportion migrates westward ;
the latter contingent being the source of those occasional snow-geese met with here and there

16 Geese of Europe and Asia

in European Russia and farther west in various parts of Europe, and the birds regularly
passing the winter on the Caspian.

That subsequent travellers in Siberia have not confirmed the statements of Pallas
and Krasheninnikov is absolutely of no importance. It is quite recently, for instance, that
Fischer’s eider-duck has been found breeding at the mouth of the Yana, and Gidemia
stejnegeri nesting constantly in the Altai. Besides this, it must not be forgotten that
this goose, as we have seen at the beginning of this article, has native names, which
undoubtedly points to an intimate acquaintance with these birds on the part of the natives,
who generally do not give names to rare and little-known animals.

Unfortunately, we must confine ourselves to hypotheses respecting the distribution
of the snow-goose in Eastern Europe, and it only remains to add that, according to
report, it is frequently seen as a bird of passage on the middle Volga, as stated by
Mr. Buturlin.

Dr. С. T. Radde, in his Ovuzs Caucasica, says that in severe’ winters, among great
masses of various geese wintering in the Kizil-Agach Gulf, small flocks of snow-geese are
met with, which are very vigilant, and are known to all local hunters as white geese with
black primaries and secondaries. Nine of these geese were observed on February 28 (March
11), 1880, at the Burani Islands, but on March 5-17, when Dr. Radde was there, they
had already left.

As regards these geese visiting Western Europe, there is no lack of data, although of
course they have been more often seen than caught, a usual circumstance in connection
with wild geese of all species. If most or all have hitherto been noticed in Great Britain,
this evidently is in consequence of the greater number of persons interested in zoology,
and the greater number of wild-fowlers. Judging by the snow-geese hitherto taken in
England and Ireland, they all belonged to the lesser form, 2.е. Chen hyperboreus, and
not to the greater, Chen mivafis; from this it is clear that they could not have arrived
from the eastern part of North America, where only the larger form is found, but from
other regions, probably the northern part of the Palzearctic region, but the precise locality
the future alone can make clear.

In other parts of Western Europe snow-geese have also been observed comparatively
often. They have been observed, for instance, in Germany (as noticed by Naumann); in
Norway, where, according to Dr. Collett,? a female was taken in 1889 in Lesterland, not far
from Lindesnas, in the southern point of Norway, where, on September 24, 1889, four
birds settled, of which one was killed and given to the Christiania Museum. This was
an old female; the three remaining birds lingered for some days.

It is affirmed that these geese have been more than once noticed in the Greek
Archipelago, and probably they will be found wintering in the Black Sea, when that sea
shall be visited by systematic zoologists. As to the cases occasionally mentioned of the
appearance of snow-geese among flocks of bean-geese, or that, during the flight of flocks
of the latter, snow-geese were seen leading them, such identifications are mere guess-
work and devoid of certainty. Different species of geese in general keep apart from
others, and to suppose that one species should lead individuals belonging to another, is
to me personally more than doubtful. Albinos, however, undoubtedly occur among geese ;
and it seems more simple to explain these instances by the suggestion that albino bean-geese,

+ It may, however, be assumed as almost certain not only in severe but in all winters,
2 Ornithologisches Jahrbuch, 1890, 1. p. 37.

Snow-Goose 17

flying at the head of the flock, have been taken for snow-geese. Albinism, as is well known,
is a pathological or abnormal phenomenon, which apparently may occur in birds from their
very hatching (sometimes, after several moultings, it happens that albinism disappears, in
consequence of the removal of the inducing cause), or in the prime of life, or, finally, in old
age. I suggest, then, that in such cases old birds, which have for many years led the flock,
having from some cause contracted albinism, still continue to guide the flock in their new
dress. Of course, all this is only hypothesis, but the same is true also of the identification
of the snow-goose in such white specimens.

Somewhat more exact data as to the geographical distribution of this species and the
form Chen nivalis have been obtained in regard to North America. Thus Chen hyperboreus
is met with over the whole of the western half of North America, and breeds, besides, on the
Arctic western shore, also in Alaska, descending in winter through the whole country lying
between the Pacific Ocean and the valley of the Mississippi. It abounds from Alaska and
the Washington district to South Carolina; and reappears in great numbers in the middle
and western parts of California in winter, keeping chiefly to the fens and plains situated near
the sea, or occurring on the sandy shoals and spits projecting into the latter. Here the birds
arrive from the north in October, and stay till March, when, simultaneously with other geese,
they again take wing to the north. That the snow-geese appearing in winter in Japan are
natives of North America I strongly doubt, since it is practically certain that birds come
there from Northern Asia to spend the winter.

An astonishing fact, it seems to me, is the migration of this goose to the island of
Maui, as mentioned by the Hon. Walter Rothschild in his Avifauna of Layzan.

The above, then, are the general limits within which the snow-goose has been hitherto
found.

The food of the snow-goose, at least in winter, consists apparently almost exclusively
of vegetables, such as shoots of various grasses, reeds, etc. ; but it is very probable that the
young birds vary their diet with insects and molluscs, as is the case with the majority of
other species of geese. In summer, however, they gladly devour berries.

In general, undisturbed birds of this species are fairly tame, but they quickly recog-
nise danger, and then become as unapproachable as the majority of other geese. According
to the evidence of some observers (such as Pallas), these geese are rather silent, but
sometimes during flight they utter a sharp cry, like Kfouk, although they do not call
continuously like the brants. Despite their wariness, man has succeeded in outwitting
them, as they readily enter decoys of members of their own species, paying for their folly
with their lives in large numbers. It is said that in North America their salted carcasses
are kept by the natives some two years, and are then considered good eating.

Their summer food, according to Sir John Richardson, is mainly composed of cane-
shoots and insects, in autumn of the berries of Eimpetrum nigrum.

The eggs of this goose are of a regular oval form, and white. Their length is about
3 in. (=76 mm.), and the transverse diameter 2 in. (=51 шт.) The number of eggs in a

1 According to a communication by Mr. G. F. Gobel, an egg of a snow-goose, in the Zoological Museum at St. Petersburg, has the
following measurements—

Breadth, 52.5 mm. (= 2.06 in.)
Length 30.5 5, “G=3.52-1n.)

This is very probably an egg of Chen nivalts..

In regard to the structure of the egg, this zoologist says: ‘The grain of the shell resembles that of the white-fronted goose, but the
elevations are more conspicuous and less close, so that there is room for dirt to lodge in the interstices, as is seen in the specimen above
mentioned. Mr. Gdbel does not indicate its origin.”

D

18 Geese of Europe and Asia

clutch is rarely large, but I have nowhere succeeded in finding exact data on this point,
In August the young birds become fledged, and somewhat later the old ones finish moulting,
so that by the beginning of September the majority are already capable of moving south,
although belated broods sometimes remain in their hatching-grounds until October.

Very interesting are the details of a case of crossing a gander of this species, taken in
England, with a common domestic goose, from which goslings were reared. These details
were given by Mr. J. Е. Harting in the 20040215 for 1878 and 1881.

GREATER SNOW-GOOSE
CHEN NIVALIS, FORSTER

Bolshot bely gus (Buturlin) ; 004540: folyarny gus (Buturlin).

Note.—If it should prove that both this snow-goose and the lesser species occur in Russia, probably some of the native names, cited for
the latter, would refer also to the present species.

English.—Gveater Snow Goose.

Anas nivalis, Forster, Phil. Trans., lxii. р. 413 (1771) (Hudson’s Вау).

Anas hyperborea, Gmelin, Syst. Nat., ii. p. 504, р. 54 (рат) (1785).

Anser hyperboreus, Bonnaterre, Enc. Méth., 1. р. 111 (1790); Pallas, Zoogr. Ross.-As., ii. р. 227 (partim) (resp.
Fret. Huds.) (1811); Audubon, Orn. Biogr., iv. p. 562, pl. 381 (1838); Buturlin, Dikie Gusi R. I.
Zuri | soy, i kuch, ОБЬ.” “1001 = 2%, sepat,.). то; 24. babi (Opr, Plastinchatokl, “Psov. 1 Ruzh:
Okh.,” 1900; 14., separ. рр. 5 and 6; Menzbier, Pt. Ross., i. р. 723 (1895). |

Chen hyperboreus, Gray, Hand-List of Birds, iii. р. 75, №. 10570 (1871); Baird and Ridgway, Water Birds of
М. America, 1. р. 439 (parti), 1884.

Chen hyperboreus nivalis, Ridgway, Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., И. р. 107 (1884); Baird and Ridgway, of. си, ii.
р. 440 (1884). |

Anser hyperboreus nivalis, ЗесБорт, Hist. Brit. Birds, iii. р. 490 (1885); Buturlin, Sinopt. tabl. ОКВ. Pt. В. Г,
IQOI, pp. 41 and 42.

Chen hyperborea nivalis, Ridgway, Man. N. American Birds, p. 115 (188 Ta:

ADULT AND YOUNG BIRDS

These are not distinguished from the preceding species in plumage and colour, but
merely differ in dimensions, which considerably exceed those of Chen hyperboreus.

Total length 30—38 in. (= 762—965 mm.).

Wing 17.35-17.50 in. (= 44-444 mm.).
Culmen 2.55—2.70 in. (= 65-69 mm.).
Tarsus

3.15—3.50 in. (= 80—89 mm.).

Median digit 2.60—2.80 in. (= 66—71 mm.).

Although these dimensions are given by different authors, it must be supposed,
according to the views of Mr. Leffingwell,' that specimens exist of smaller dimensions,

1 Shooting on Upland, Marsh, and Stream, Chicago, 1890, p. 314.

Greater Snow-Goose 19

standing between С. hyperboreus and С. nivalis. Unfortunately this author does not give
more detailed data or measurements of such intermediate individuals.

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

Approximately the whole of Northern Arctic America to the east of the Mackenzie
River is the breeding-ground of this form, which in winter and during migration occurs
in the United States from the east of the Mississippi to the Atlantic Ocean. There is, how-
ever, no occasion in this work to enter into greater detail concerning its distribution.

Genus Philacte, Bannister (1870)

BILL comparatively short, very square and stout, with feebly curved edges and very large
nail on upper mandible, which occupies nearly the whole apical third of latter. Nasal fossz
wide and rounded, their posterior edges approaching very near to feathering of lores in
adults, and confluent with the same in young birds; nasal apertures not large, but of rounded
form,—their anterior edge falling somewhat short of the middle of the bill; tarsus shorter
than median digit. Soft-parts light-coloured. Outer half of upper nail of bill (in younger
birds) or only its outer edge (full-grown) dark horn-brown colour.’

THE EMPEROR-GOOSE
PHILACTE CANAGICA, SEVASTIANOV
Plate 2

English—mperor-Goose ; Painted Goose; White-headed Goose.

Russian—Kurilski gus (Kamchatka,—Vozvesensky) ; 6e/oshed (Kamchatka,—Krasheninni-
kov); golubot gus (Buturlin) ; cmperatorski gus (Menzbier); ¢sarski gus (Smirnov).

Aleut—Kamkhang. |

Eskimos—Khua-yar-lik (= сар goose); makhoutiluk.

French—Sernache canagica (Degl. and Gerbe).

Anas canagica, Sevastianov, Nov. Act. Ac. St.-Pét., xiii. p. 346, pl. x. (1800). ;

Anas canadicus (errore), Sevastianov, in Opisanie Kamchatki, Krasheninnikov, ii. р. 473 (notes) (1818).

Anser pictus, Pall., Zoogr. Козз.-Аз., ii. р. 233, pl. 67 (1811); Nordensk., Voy. of the Vega, i, р: 42 (1981),
Smirnov, “ Okhotn. Gaz.,” 1900, р. 294.

Anser canagicus, Brandt, Bull. Ас. Sc, S.-Pét, 1. p37 (1836) 3 22., Deser, её Icones Ав. В 055: в ра,
(1836); Buturlin, Dikie Gusi В. I. (“Psov. i Ruzh. ОКВ.” Beb-Apty 190135 204 separ, pale 29%,
Tabl. Opredel. Plastinch. (“ Psov. i Ruzh. Okh.,” 1900); 22, sinopt. Labl, ‘ОК РЕВ Ее.
Macpherson, A History of Fowling, 1897, р. 210.

Bernicla canagica, Gray, Genera of Birds, iii. р. 607 (1844); Rchnb., Syn. Ау. Natat,, pl. 101, figs. 414,415 (1845);
Degl. and Gerbe, Orn. Eur,, И. р. 492 (1867).

Chloiphaga, canagica, Bonaparte, Compt.-Rend., xliii. p. 648 (1856); Baird, Birds of N. America, p. 768 (1858) ;
24, Cat. № American Birds, No. 573 (1859); Elliot, Ш. American Birds, pl. 45 (1866); Dall and
Bannister, Trans. Chic. Acad., 1. р. 296 (1869); Dall, Notes Avif. Aleut, Isl. Unal. Eastw., р. 5 (1879);
Adams, Ibis, 1878, р. 420. |

Phitacte canagica, Bannister, Proc, Ac. Philad., 1870, р. 131; Coues, Key М. American Birds, р, 283 (1372);
Ridgway, Man. М. American Birds (1882); Elliot, Mon. Seal. Isl., р. 130 (1882); Nelson, Cruise Corwin,
р. 95 (1883); Baird and Ridgway, Water-Birds М. America, i. p. 477 (1884) ; Coues, Key N. American
Birds, 2 ed., р. 689 (1884); Stejneger, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., x. р. 135 (1887) (Bering Isl.) ; Taczanowski,

1 Judging by the closed bills of the skins examined by myself, the number of teeth on each side of the upper mandible does not
exceed 20. But the available material was inadequate.

20

Emperor-Goose Sel

Faune Orn. Sib. or., р. 1112 (1893); Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus., xxvii. p. 109 (1895); Menzbier,
in Slyunin's “ Okhotsko-Kamchat. Krai,” p. 347 (1900) ees sus); Buturlin, Dikie Gusi Ross. I.
(“ Psov. 1 Ruzh, Okh.,” 1901); z@, separ, р. го.

Chen canagica, Newton, в. Brit., oth сах: р 770 (1879) > 7a “РЕВ р Choos

Anser (Philacte) canagicus, Palmén, Bidr. Е Ishafsk. Fogelf. Vows Е

ADULT Втво$ oF BoTH SEXES

Head and whole hind- neck white, often with rusty (or yellow or amber-yellow) tinge,
deepest on anterior part of head. Throat, fore-neck, and sides of neck brownish black.
Prevailing colour of plumage of body bluish cinereous with black sub-terminal crescent-
shaped bars, bordered with white. These black crescent-shaped bars are sharply defined on
upper surface of body, somewhat fainter on breast and flanks, but almost totally absent on
the abdomen. Tail pure white on terminal half, and greyish or slaty greyish basally.
Lesser upper wing-coverts, primary coverts, and primaries dark slate. Greater wing-coverts
slaty grey, bordered with white. Secondaries dark slate with white borders. Lining of
wings and axillaries brown-grey. Bill and other naked parts, according to Nelson,—“ lower
mandible dark horn-colour, with a white spot on each side of branching rami; membrane
about nares livid blue, rest of upper mandible pale purplish, with a fleshy-white east. edge
of nail dark horn-colour, rest of nail horn-white; iris hazel: legs and feet bright orange-
yellow.”

IMMATURE BIRDS

Dark (black-brown) featherlets mingled in white of head.

YOUNG BIRDS OF THE YEAR

АП feathers of body far narrower than in adults, those of upper surface pointed.
Head and neck slate-grey, former speckled with white, especially on crown. Transverse
mottlings on feathers less marked than in adults. Bill and feet dark.

YounGc BIRDS OF SECOND YEAR

Number of white featherlets on hind-neck considerable, giving it a very finely speckled
appearance.

Apparently, in the young in down, the neal and the whole of the neck should be
dark slate, but this statement, it seems, is only an hypothesis and is not based on facts.

Total length of adult birds ; 650—700 mm. (= 25.5—27.5 in.).
Wing about . 350—400 mm. (= 14—15.7 in.).
Culmen. ; , : 35—49 mm. (= 1.37—1.92 in.).
Tarsus . =. : 66—72 mm. (= 2.60—2.85 in.).
Middle digit ithe see : ; 61—63.5 mm. (= 2.40—2.50 in.).

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

In Russia this magnificent bird is as yet known to breed only in the Chukchi
Peninsula, mainly on the river Anadyr; as a bird of passage it winters in Kamchatka, and

22 Geese of Europe and hard

has been found on the Komandor Islands (Bering Isl.). At any rate, like Sevastianov,!
I can refer the “white-necked geese,” mentioned by Krasheninnikov in his Ofisanie
Kamchatki, only to this species.

I may here note that in the above work of Krasheninnikov, Sevastianov calls this
goose 4uas canadicus, having forgotten probably that eighteen years previously it was named
and described by himself as „(из cauagica, with the explanation that this name was given
to the species on account of its inhabiting the island of Kanaga. From the river Uka,
Kamchatka, there is an adult female in the Zoological Museum of the Imperial Academy
of Sciences at St. Petersburg, which in size of bill (culmen = 49 mm. ог 1.92 in.) exceeds
very considerably the dimensions given by American ornithologists. The label on this
female bears the name Kuvrilshi gus.

A specimen from Bering Island, probably a male, brought by Mr. Grynewecki, is
also a big bird, and somewhat exceeds the American measurements. Personally I do not
at all doubt that this splendid goose will prove to breed even considerably westward of
Chukchiland, along the shore of the Arctic Ocean. The fact of several aquatic birds having
been quite lately found far more to the west of North-eastern Asia than they were supposed
to range in the days of Pallas, points to the probability of many other analogous discoveries
which at present we cannot even guess. So far, however, I can add nothing to the distribu-
tion of this species in the east; on the other hand I am compelled to pass more to the
west and quote the statement of Messrs. Degland and Gerbe to the effect that Mr. Е.
Verreaux twice obtained this goose from his correspondent on the banks of the Volga: on
the first occasion in 1849, and then again in 1853.

This last specimen was in the rich collection of Count Turati in Milan. Messrs.
Degland and Gerbe express themselves on the subject to the effect that, of course, they see
nothing impossible in such a fact, but that they included this species in their work under
a note of interrogation, as a member of the European fauna, since while perfectly trusting
Mr. Е. Verreaux, they cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information of his correspondent.
On this observation I may remark that it seems to me easier to grant the possibility of this
goose accidentally straying from Eastern Siberia to the Volga,—the more that the western
limit of its breeding-grounds in Siberia is quite unknown,—than to explain how otherwise
these specimens could have come into the hands of Mr. Verreaux’s correspondent at the
date in question, when it is even now by no means easy to obtain a skin of this goose
anywhere in Europe. Moreover it is hardly possible that Mr. Verreaux’s correspondent
even suspected the value and the scientific importance which his specimen represents. To
suppose that these geese came into the hands of his correspondent from America is still
more difficult than to believe that they were derived from Chukchiland.

* I here quote the words of Sevastianov, only omitting the description of the bird and its dimensions. The description is printed
in vol. xii, № а Acta Acad. Sc. Imp. Petrop., р. 341. 1 preserve the orthography. ‘En parcourant la précieuse collection
d’oiseaux, apportée par Monsieur le capitaine de la flotte Billings de son voyage, fait dans l’Archipel des Isles situées entre les cétes
orientales de la Sibérie et de Kamtchatka et les cétes occidentales de ’Amérique, et que РПирёгайлсе, de glorieuse mémoire Cathérine I1.,
envoya & l’Academie pour étre conservée dans son Musée, j’ai trouvé quelques variétés d’oiseaux, et entre autres une nouvelle espéce de
canard, qui & mon зси n’a jamais été décrite par aucun des naturalistes connus, c’est pourquoi j’ai entrepris d’en faire la description et de
donner la figure de cet oiseau, digne d’attirer la curiosité des Naturalistes par sa beauté et le mélange élégant de ses couleurs.” Here
follow the description and dimensions, which I omit. “Се canard, dans le catalogue des oiseaux, rapportés par Mr. Billings, porte le nom
systématique d’Anas canagica. II est trés probable que cette nouvelle езрёсе a été découverte par Mr. le capitaine Billings sur l’Isle Canaga
ou Kyktak, une des Isles Aléoutes les plus proches des cétes de PAméerique septentrionale, et situé derriére le cap Aliazka, et que le nom
de l’espéce, c.a.d. canagica, a été imposé & cet oiseau du nom de la premicre ile, ou de celui des principaux habitans de Ре Kyktak, appellée
(sic) Caniagues ош Canagues, qui, peut-étre, ayant apprivoisé cet oiseau Pont rendu domestique. Ces (sic) sont des sauvages tres belliqueux
et que les Russes, dans un second voyage entrepris par Schelichoff, avaient beaucoup de реше & se soumettre. Je ne puis rien dire des moeurs
et des autres particularités, qui regardent cet oiseau, car nous n’avons aucune notice sur le voyage, n’ayant jamais vu le jour et ayant été
déposé dans les Archives du College de l’Amirauté, ой il se trouve jusqu’’ présent.”

Emperor-Goose ideas =

Iam therefore rather inclined to believe that, from time to time, this goose strays to
the Volga, as I do not consider such a range at all more improbable than the annual winter
visit to the Caspian of the snow-goose. |

Regarding North America, it is known that the emperor-goose lives in abundance
along the lower reaches of the river Yukon and at its mouth, so that it is there the
predominating species. It breeds also on the island of St. Michael and in Norton Bay.
In winter it descends to Humboldt Bay in California. It migrates to Alaska about
June 1 or somewhat earlier, according to the weather. As soon as the young leave the
egg, the old birds begin to moult. . Dall saw а half-moulted specimen in Pastolik on
July 29, 1867. This goose lingers in Alaska longer than the others, until the shore is
ice-bound, feeding on molluscs, such as Mytilus edulis and others; having been observed
there by Russians till November 1.

The emperor-goose more often keeps in pairs or parties of four or five than in large
flocks. Its note is purer and shriller than that of the white-fronted goose or Canadian
goose, and in general it is more wary than all other geese, except perhaps Branta nigricans.
According to Dall, its flesh and skin possess an insufferable smell of garlic, so that even
skinning it is a very unpleasant operation, but on roasting this unpleasant odour vanishes,
and the flesh becomes tender and tasty. Mr. Bannister, during his visit to the island of St.
Michael, states that two young specimens were killed. He mentions the bad odour of the
flesh, and says that in removing the skin this smell remains on the hands, so that it is
almost impossible to wash it off. He considers the flesh of this goose uneatable by
-Europeans, but says that Indians and Eskimos eat it readily. This condemnation by
Mr. Bannister is, however, refuted by Mr. Elliot, according to whom, on the Pribylov
Islands, this species occurs only as a stray visitor,! and appears sometimes in such an
exhausted condition that the natives take it in whole flocks, the members of which they
pursue openly over the grass. Mr. Elliot found their flesh without unpleasant smell, and
very good eating. According to this author the unpleasant odour is limited to the skin,
and when the bird is properly charred entirely disappears.

_— The eggs of this goose, according to Mr. Adams (/65, 1878), have a dingy colour
(according to other statements, sub-rufous), which, according to the investigations of Mr. G. F.
Gobel, should indicate considerable porosity of the shell. The eggs have a breadth of
73.6-78.7 mm. (= 2.9-3.1 in.) and a length of 84.5-86.3 mm. (= 3.33-3.40 in.).

This exhausts the scanty information with regard to this goose at present available.

1 During migration.

Genus user, Brisson (1760)

Вил, with nails and feet, entirely light-coloured ; but in young birds nails on bill grey or
horn-brown.

On abdomen (in adults) brown or black patches, sometimes confluent. Prevailing
colour of plumage brownish grey.

THE GREY-LAG GOOSE
AANSER ANSER, LINN.
Plate 2

English—Gvey-Lag; Grey-Lag Goose; Large Grey Goose; Gander (5); in Scotland (Gaelic)
Geath-glas; Red-billed Grey Lag (Е. Coburn).

Russian—Sery gus ; aki gus; dikaya gus (Little Russ.) ; guska (Г. К.); gusak (3); guésynya
or gusynya ?—(in south); gustkha (?—in north); gusékhna (?—i ); gusya;
gusynyd (various localities); eusyénok and gusydnysh, gusydta and gusenydta
(goslings); sexydk kryshuydk;, kryzhen (lower Don, neighbourhood of Azov);
korennot and martovski gus (Transbaikal, according to Kirilov); veshkutk (ce.
vechutk, according to Pallas); ewménunik (Siberia, according to Pallas and others,
and also Transural, according to Sabaneev); vechnot gus; stbirskt sery gus
(Buturlin); 60540 sery gus (Krasheninnikov).

Gruzinian—Gaveul-batt.

Armenian— Sag.

Persian—Kazh.

Tatar—Kaz, gaz, khaz.

Kirgiz—Kongur-kaz.

Vogul—Yakh; yalunt; linda: aslunt.

Ostiak— Vugan-lont ; aslont.

Samoyed—Chuk ; zeftu and зе и; Чудо et) tyoku (Keta).

Chuvash—Kor and Khur.

Mordva—Maz7.

Cheremis—Kameoa.

Votiak—Shadshek.

Pumpokol—XKham.

Imbatskin—7em.

Assan and Kotov—Shdme.

Arin— Sam.

Mongol—Ga/u.

24

Grey-Lag Goose

Buriat—Changir-kholon (Kirilov).
Kalmyk—Galun ; chenktr-galun.
Kamashin— 7ashu.
Karagaz—Gaz.

Koibal— 7 aoze.
Tunguz—WVunyakt.

Lamut—A roads.
Yukagir—Lancha.
Koriak—Kheztoatrt.
Kamchadale—Ksvae.
Kuril—Kuztiip.

Japanese—Gam (Pallas).
Polish—Ges gengawa.

Est—Jets ant (°)

Lett—Mescha sohs.
Finn—Hanhi; harmaahanht'
French—Ovze cendrée ; oe sauvage ; ote vulgare.

a5

German—Stammegans ; Wildgans ; Mérzgans ; Sommergans ; Hagelgans ; Graugans ; Graue

Gans; Grosse Graugans; Grosse Wilde Gans; Heckgans N.S.W.

Anas anser, Linn., Syst. Nat., 1. р. 197 (1766): Habligl, Phys. Beschr. 4. Taur. Statth., р. 309 (1789).
Anas anser ferus, Bechstein, Orn. Taschenb., ii. р. 415 (1863).

Anser cinereus, Meyer, Taschenb., И. р. 551 (1810); Brehm, Убе. Deutschl., р. 835 (1831); Naumann, Vog.

Deutschl., xi. р. 229, pl. 285 (1842); Nordmann, J. f. Orn. 1864, р. 326; Fritsch, Убе. Eur, р. 408,
pl. 45, fig. 8 (1870); Dresser, Birds of Europe, vi. р. 355, pl. 41 (1878); Finsch, Verh. zool.-bot. Ges.
Wien, 1879, р. 258 (Zap. Sibir) ; Degl. and Gerbe, Orn. Eur. ii. p. 479 (1867); Radde, Ornis. Cauc., р. 445
(1884); 24, Bull. Soc. Мозс., 1854, Ш. р. 160; Radde and Walter, Die Vog. Тгапзсазр., р. 120
(1888); Radde, Sib. R, И. р. 358 (1863); Schrenck, Vog. Amurl., р. 465 (1860); Zarndny, Orn. Е.
Zakasp. Кг. р. 439 (1896); 7, Rech. Zool, Bull. Soc. Mose. (1890); Zarndny, Orn. Е. Or. kr,
р. 222 (1888) ; zd, Dopoln. К. Orn. Е. Or. Кг. р. 108 (1897) ; Nikolsky, Pozv. Zh. Kryma, р. 288 (1891) ;
24, Bull. Soc. Mosc. No. 4 (1892); Sabaneev, Trudy Yarosl. Stat. K., р. 284 (1868); zd, Ukaz.
Kn. i St. Zool. i ОКВ, Sod., pp. 455-458 (1883); zd, Prolet Gusei, “Zhurn. Imp. Ob. ОКБ.” 1874, i, ii;
Przewalski, Put. Uss. kr, 1870; 24. IV. Putesh. Tsentr. Az. р. 327 (1888); Zhitnikov, М. “Psov. i
Ruzh. ОКВ.” 1890; (Nabl. па г. Atreke); 24, separ. passim; Buturlin, Opredel. Plastinch., “ Psov. i
Ruzh. ОКБ.” 1890; 24, separ. р. 8; 24, Dikie Gusi В. I.,.“ Psov. 1 Ruzh. Okh.,” 1901 ; 24, separ., р. 12,
etc.; Kessler, КиззК. Ornit., р. 372 (1847); Eversmann, Or. Кг. Ш. р. 552 (1866); Menzbier, Pt.
Ross., i. р. 748 (1895); 24, ОКВ. 1 Prom. Pt. Ross. i Kavk., р. 477, pl. 137 (1902); Yakovlev, Bull.
Soc. Мозс. 356, 1872; Biichner and Pleske, Beitr. 2. Orn. S. P. С. 1881, No. 175; ‘Biichner,
Pt. Spb. в. р. 512 (1884); Porchinsky, Tr. Spb. Ob. Yest., Ш. 1873, р. 376; Pleske, Th., Siug.-Vég.
Kola Hlbns, (Beitr. Kennt. R. К., ser. 2, 1886, р. 232; 24, Rev. Turk. Ога. р. 54) (1888); Zhitnikov,
M., Osenni pr. dol. г. Murgaba, “Psov. i Ruzh. ОКВ.” 1897, pt. iv. р. 65; Gdbel, Убе. Kr. Uman
(Beitr. Kennt. К. R., ser. 2, 1879, р. 206; Somoy, М. М., Orn. Е. Khark,, р. 442 (1897); Bogdanoy,
М. №, Ptitsy i Zveri Povolzhya, р. 146 (1871); 7d, Pt. Kavk. р. 171 (1879); Radde, Mus. Cauc.,
В. Г. (1899), р. 212; Taczanowski, Faune Orn. Sib. Or, р. 1089 (1894); Severtsov, Per. Yavl.
Vor. gab. passim (1855); 24, Vert. 1 Goriz. raspr. Turk Zh. (1873); Alphéraky, Kuldzha i
Tianshan (1891), рр. 25, 47, 1453. Palmén, Cab. Journ. f. Ога. xxiv. $. 52 (1876); Nikolsky,
Faun. Mlek. i Pt. Priaralsk., Bull. Soc. Мозс., No. 4 (1392); Sushkin,. Pt.- Ul cub, в: о.
Deryngin, Orn. Izst. Psk. сиб. Trudy I. Spb. Ob. Vest. vol. xxvii. (1897); zd, vol. xxix.,, ta 2
(1898); David and Oust. Ois. Chine, р. 491 (1877); Severtsov, Zeitschrift Ges. Orn, 1887, р. 22;
Hume and Marshall, Game Birds Ind,, iii. р. 55 (with pl.) (1880); Silantyev, Opred. Yevrop. Pt.,
1901, р. 112; 24, Obzor Prom. ОКВ. Ross, 1898, р. 110; Kholodkov i опапеуею Ре. Уют. hen
pl. 42, fig. т (1901); Maak, Amur, Prib, р. 144 (gus gumennik) (1859); Brauner, Zametki о
it, Where, separ, р. 32° (1894); м, Kratkiya opredel., Dichi Stepn. pol. Rossii, 1897, р. 100;

+ Although Malmgren gives the name JdZetsahanhi (wood-goose) for the grey-lag, it is evident, as observed already by Е. D.
Pleske in his work on the animals of the Kola Peninsula, that this name belongs to bean-geese (MZ. arvensis).

E

26 Geese of Europe and Asia

Johansen, Nauchn. Ocherki Tomsk. Кг. 1898, Omd. ptits, р. 65; Khomyakov, Pt. Ryaz. (Mat. pozn.
Faun. i Fl. В. I, Omd. Zool. pt. 5 (1900)); Lorenz, Die Vogel Mosk. Gouv., р. 58 (MS. note
of author on absence in: Mosc. Gov.) (1894); Ruzsky, М. Trudy Obshch. Yest. pr. Kaz. Universit., xxy.
pt. 6, р. 115 (1893); Zarndny, Ekskur. Sev.-vostochn. Pers, Pt, р. 105. “Zap. Нар. Ak. N.? vai
ser. vol. x., No. т (1900); Pleske, Th. Orn. Ausb. Gebr. Grum-Grzym. Centr. As. (Mél. Biol. xiii, 5
298, 1892); Buturlin, Sinopt. tabl. Okhotn. Pt, р. 45 (1901); Karamzin, Pt. Bugur., Bugulm. i ва,
Ufimsk., р. 180 (1901); Kirilov, ОКВ. i Okhotn. Khozyaistvo Zabaik. (“Prir. 1 Okhota,” 1902,
iii.) ; Gobel, G. Oolog. MS. (1902); MS. inserted at length in this work.

Anser vulgaris, Pallas, Zoogr. Ross.-As., И. р. 222 (1811); Vavilov, Okhota у Rossii, pt. 4, р. 37 (1873);
Yablonsky, “Риг. i Okh.,” 1891, vii. (ОКБ. у Minusinsk. uyezde Yenis.).

Auser ferus, Schaeff., Mus. Оги., р. 67 (1789); Stephens, Gen. Zool., хи. р. 28, pl. 41 (1824); Gould, Birds of
Europe, pl. 347; Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus. xxvii. р. 89 (1895); Artsibash., Bull. Soc. Мозс.
1859, Ш. р. 99; Blanford, Fauna Brit. India, Birds, iv. (1898), р. 416; Finn, How to know the
Indian Ducks, 1901, p. 14; Macpherson, History of Fowling, 1897, p. 222.

Anser palustris, Fleming, Brit. Animals, р. 126 (1828).

Anser sylvestris, Brehm (nec Brisson), Убе. Deutschl., р. 836 (1831).

Anser ctneraceus (errore), Marchand, Revue et Mag. Zool. (1877), р. 355, pl. 14 (pudlus, pl. сххху.). |

Anser anser, Hartert, Kat. Vogelsamml., р. 226 (1891); Oates, Man. Game Birds of India, ii. p. 90 (1899).

Anser rubrirostris (Hodgson, Leon. zned.), Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus. xxvii, 1895, р. 91; Gray, Cat.
Hodgson Coll. Brit. Mus., р. 144 (1846); Zhitnikov, Nabl. na г. Atreke (“ Psov. i Ruzh. ОКВ.” 1900);
24., зераг., р. 56, еёс.; Buturlin, Dikie Gusi R. I. (“Psov. i Ruzh. ОКВ.” 1901, Febr.-Apr.) ; 24. separ.
p 13% Coburn, Е. “The Zoolosist,” 190 р.б,

Anser cinereus var. rubrirostris, Swinhoe, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1871, р. 416 (Shanghai); Przewalski,
Mongol. 1 str. Tang, И. р. 149 (1871); Buturlin, Opred. Plastinchatokl. (“Psov. i Ruzh. ОКБ.” 1900);
24., separ. р. 9 (Szbirsky бегу gus).

Anser cinereus В subalbtfrons, Severtsov, J. f. Orn., 1875, р. 184 (nomen nudum).

Anser cinereus rubrirostris, Seebohm, Hist. Brit. Birds, iii. р. 501 (1885); Zarndny, Eksp. Vost. Persii, 1901,
Pp: £22-and 13 8: |

Anser ferus 5. vulgaris, Sevast., in note to Opisanie Kamchatki, Krasheninnikov, pp. 473 and 488 (1818),

Sery gus, Aksakov, Zap. Okhotn. Or. ©. р. 150 (1852) (2nd ed.).

ADULT MALE

Head, neck, and anterior half of back grey-brown; scapulars grey-brown, with lighter
greyish edges. Around base of bill a narrow, more or less interrupted, white streak, which,
as in some other geese, and in particular the Chinese goose, is sometimes coloured more or
less bright rufous or rusty. Generally this streak, 2-3 mm. in width at its broadest part,
i.e. on forehead, is broken at the bare angles of upper mandible, so as to be sometimes reduced
to a mere white patch on forehead and to a lesser patch on each side of the base of bill.
This white streak attains its greatest development in very aged ganders; but cases occur
where the white patch attains a far greater development on the forehead than usual, and,
probably, on the basis of such a specimen Severtsov established a variety—Bp subalobifrons,
without, however, giving a description ( Journ. Г. Orn., 1875, р. 184).

Lower back and rump light ashen grey ; upper tail-coverts white. Fore-neck, breast,
and abdomen light greyish brown; on abdomen more or less numerous transverse black
bars, scattered or more or less confluent, the latter apparently occurring in older birds.’
Lower abdomen, vent, and lower tail-coverts white. Tail usually consisting of 18 feathers,’
coloured as follows: two outer ones white on each side; two middle greyish brown, with
white tips; the rest for the most part greyish brown, with very thin outer white margins,
while their inner webs pass, more or less gradually, towards the edge into whitish, the tips —
however being all white. Sides of body brown with lighter grey edges to feathers,
producing a transverse light-barred appearance. Upper lesser wing-coverts, carpal, winglet,
primary coverts, and primaries themselves in basal third very light ashen grey; middle

1 The same observed in white-fronted goose and in lesser white-fronted goose.
р
There are statements аз to the number of tail-feathers sometimes reaching 20.

Grey-Lag Goose 27

-and greater wing-coverts, secondaries, and tertiaries brown ; latter, like primaries with white
shafts, becoming brown only at apex. Middle and greater wing-coverts with whitish edges
on outer webs. Under wing-coverts and axillaries light ashen grey. .
As the colouring of the bill itself is described in more detail below, it will suffice
here to note that the number of teeth on each side of the upper mandible in nearly all the
specimens I have seen varied between 21 and 23, although, to my surprise, in a male brought
by Col. Przewalski from Koko-Nor, I found 28.1. A character very sharply distinguishing
this goose from the species of the genus J/e/anonyx is the colour of the teeth, which in all
grey-lag geese are yellowish white, while in the latter they are dark, sometimes almost black,
and only in a few specimens yellow at the spot where the yellow band reaches them at the
apex of the bill. The bill itself is of more or less vivid pink flesh-colour, but as a rare
exception yellowish orange ;—a point to which we shall return later. Nail of upper man-
dible in majority of cases white or horny white, or greyish white, with slight bluish tinge.
Iris brown; legs and feet, normally, flesh-colour; claws black.

ADULT FEMALE

This is distinguished from the gander in nothing except the somewhat inferior size
and, on the whole, less weight; but it must be remembered that large old females may
considerably exceed in both respects small although fully adult ganders.

Before giving the dimensions of adult birds, I may discuss in somewhat greater
detail the colouring of the bill.

In British Birds, their Nests and Feggs, Mr. J. Cordeaux states that a friend of his
killed a grey-lag in Lincolnshire, whose bill, with the exception of a narrow strip in front of
the white nail, was orange. Since then I have received information from Mr. Frohawk
that, in the opinion of certain competent ornithologists, in the Scotch representatives of this
goose the bill is regularly yellow-orange in colour. In regard to this, I wrote to Mr. Frohawk
approximately as follows: “А+ the present time, as is well known, in Great Britain this Species
is resident only in Scotland and the Hebrides. This being so, it seems to me evident that
among such resident birds there occur fat, well-fed specimens. That in the yellow-orange
colouring of the bill the subcutaneous layer of fat plays the chief part I have no doubt, as I
maintain also in the case of the white-fronted goose. There are also many striking examples
among other species of far better fed and heavier resident birds being compared with migra-
tory birds of the same species or those that only come for the breeding season. We know, for
example, that the mallard, living permanently in any locality, far exceed in weight those merely
passing or coming to breed; and at the same time we know that only among resident mallard
(sometimes reaching 5 lbs. in weight) occur specimens with bright orange bills, which are
never found in migrating birds. We also know that resident grey partridges considerably
exceed those migrating (in autumn) in size and weight, and have the legs yellowish, while
in migrating birds these are always of amore bluish hue. Here also I attribute the difference
in the colouring of the legs to the presence or absence of a subcutaneous fat layer. However
this may be, yet, speaking of migrating grey-lag geese, no responsible author mentions their
having orange bills. Sir R. Payne-Gallwey writes, for instance, that in England ‘the bill (of
the grey-lag goose) is of a uniform flesh-colour, except the white nail. Legs and feet are

>: Be)

flesh-colour.
1 I cannot as yet say anything of this, in my opinion, strange case, but it would be very desirable that sportsmen, having occasion
to shoot grey-lag, should direct attention to the number of teeth of the birds they kill, whereby, perhaps, might be explained how far such a

variation is normal, or, on the contrary, exceptional,

28 Geese of Europe and Asia

DIMENSIONS oF Арогт BrrRDS oF Вотн SEXES

Total length | 762—880 mm. (= 30—35 in.).
Ехрапзе . 1422—1778 mm. (= 56-70 in.).
Wing . ; , ; , 398—482 mm. (=15.75—19 in.).
Culmen ; | 1 61—71.5 mm. (= 2.4—2.8 in.).
Bill from gape. : 64—76 mm. (= 2.5—3 in.).
Depth of both mandibles at Базе . а 37—37.5 mm. (=1.45—1.47 in.),
Greatest depth of lower mandible with shut bill . IO-10.5 mm. (=.40 т.)
Tarsus | 64—81.5 mm. (= 2.5—3.2 in.).

Weight from 5 lbs. 12 02. to 12 lbs. and, exceptionally, in some European specimens,
163 lbs. (according to Naumann).

YouNG BIRDS

On the whole, darker-coloured than adults, and without black bars on abdomen. Bil]
either very light flesh-colour or even yellowish green, with here and there a faint pink hue, as,
for example, at the edges of the upper mandible. White feathers along base of bill entirely
absent. Brownish black spots do not appear on the abdomen, and then scantily, before the
age of 2 years. Grey-lag geese attain fully adult dress not earlier at any rate than the age of

4 years. In young birds, feet and legs usually of same colour as bill, often pale yellowish
green. |

YOUNG IN Down

Upper part of body olive-brown ; forehead, sides of head, hind-neck, part of breast,
and flanks greenish yellow; rest of under-surface yellowish white. Bill and feet pale fleshy,
but perhaps sometimes more vivid flesh-colour.

Here I may quote certain information supplied by Mr. A. O. Hume on the degree of
individual variations in this species, information which, although pertaining exclusively to
birds obtained in India, nevertheless should be applicable to European, and, especially,
to Siberian representatives of this goose, the more so that some of these latter undoubtedly
winter in India.

“The plumage of our birds,” writes this excellent observer, ‘varies a good deal. In
some, which I take to be the young, the lower breast and the whole abdomen to vent are
pure white; in many they are strongly tinged with sandy or orange; in others very thickly
and conspicuously mottled with brownish black. The head and neck vary from pale ashy
or earthy brown to dark clove-brown; in most there is a mingled white and orange patch
on the forehead.? In some there is a similar spot at the base of the upper mandible on
each side, just above the gape. Often, in birds killed just before they leave us in March or
April, most of the feathers of the head and cheeks are obscurely tipped with orange, and
traces of this are seen on the whole neck. I note that most of our birds have a tiny patch
of white on the centre of the chin.

‘In some specimens the breast and abdomen are so closely blotched and mottled
with black or blackish brown, and pale rusty buff (the former predominating), as to leave no
other colour visible. The black markings will sometimes continue to within an inch of the
vent, the pale rusty colour to 24 inches beyond this. In some specimens the gathering of the
feathers of the upper neck into parallel longitudinal ridges is most marked; in others it is

1 This measurement is based on an insufficient number of specimens, and therefore can hardly be considered as the maximum.

2 This will be the white rusty or bright rusty streak at the base of the bill which Radde speaks of, and which was taken by some
authors for a bright-red base of the bill, |

Grey-Lag Goose 29

quite wanting. In some the cap and back of the upper neck are conspicuously darker ; in
some they are absolutely uniform in colour with the rest of the neck. Generally the whole
tone of the plumage varies much more than it usually does in wild birds, or than it does
in any other goose with which I am acquainted;! and though the brownest is never so
brown as either segetum, brachyrhynchus, albifrons, or minutus, and the greyest never so
grey as 2иайсиз (Е. indica), still some are very much darker and browner, and some very
much paler and greyer than others.”

Notwithstanding the seemingly especially great tendency to variation of different
individuals of this species noted by Mr. Hume, I must say that from the material I
have examined, as well as from the comparison of descriptions, I have come to the conclusion
that the individual variation in the colouring of the plumage and of the naked parts in all
species of geese is subject to innumerable changes, making it absolutely impossible to give
a description capable of completely suiting each separate specimen of a given species.

The same variations mentioned by Mr. Hume in regard to the grey-lag are also met
with in no less degree in the greater and lesser white-fronted geese.

Having once touched on the question of the variable coloration of the grey-lag, I
may here also point out the reasons which induce me to make no distinction between the
Furopean and Asiatic birds, although such a distinction has latterly been recognised
by many ornithologists. Pallas held that the Siberian bird is distinguished from the
European form both by its greater size and brighter-coloured bill, eyelids, and fect, as well
as by the richer colouring of the plumage. Much later, as appears from the synonyms
quoted above, the oriental form was separated by various authors under the name of
rubrirvostris, by some as only a variety, by others as an independent species.

And yet, so far as I have been able to convince myself from the careful investigation
of this question, there can hardly be found sufficient grounds for splitting the grey-lag goose
into two geographical races, much less into two species. I will strive to prove this as shortly
and clearly as possible.

Pallas states that the Siberian variety is larger than the European form; but this, on
comparison of the measurements and weight of birds given by other authors, is not the case.
Even the great weight of certain Transcaspian specimens quoted by Mr. Zhitnikov, namely,
12 lbs., does not exceed that of some West European individuals, given, for example, by
Naumann, who reports giants of 16$ 5.! According to this extremely careful and well-
informed ornithologist, 11-lb. grey-lag geese often occur. Mr. Hume, who cites dimensions and
weight of grey-lag geese obtained by him in India, where beyond doubt the form rudbrivostyis
should occur, says that their weight varied between 5 lbs. 12 07. and 8 Ibs. 14 oz., and that
not a single specimen weighed a full о 15. As regards dimensions, we also see that only
in rare cases do Indian specimens excel the European, and this too, it must be surmised
because among the number of geese killed there giants sometimes occur of 35 in. (= 889 ‘a
in length, which must undoubtedly be birds of very great age. It must further be remembered
that Mr. Hume, who personally shot in India several thousand grey-lag geese, attributes
such size to their age.

Although, of course, no small number of these birds are shot in Europe, yet there is
hardly a sportsman reckoning his bag of geese by thousands. Besides this, it is beyond
doubt that in Europe adult, yet comparatively young, birds are far more often killed than old

т The white-fronted goose is subject to similar great variations.
* Not drachyrhynchus, but neglectus, Sushkin,

20 Geese of Europe and Asia

ganders, which occasionally yield such exceptionally large dimensions. This last supposition
of mine is confirmed, among other things, by Aksakov’s description of grey-lag geese, in
which he calls their bills and feet yellowish green, z.e. coloured as these parts are only in
young birds, and adult, but not old, females. Regarding the richer colour of the plumage
of Siberian birds spoken of by Pallas, I must acknowledge that I could not discern it from
an examination of the skins in the museum of the St. Petersburg Academy. And Tacza-
nowski, in his ornithological work on the birds of Siberia,’ states just the contrary, namely,
that ‘these geese of Eastern Asia seem to us lighter-coloured than the geese of Europe,”
with which in general I agree. Аз to black or black-brown patches оп the abdomen, no
better case is afforded for splitting the grey-lag into two races or two species, seeing” that
these patches are subject to considerable individual variation, and undoubtedly increase in
number and in size with the age of the bird, as is the case in the greater and lesser white-
fronted geese.

In connection with the remarkable longevity of geese, of which I have already had
occasion to speak in the Introduction, it is clear that these patches must spread more and
more with age, and may at last occupy almost the whole belly.

But the third and most important character, cited by authors for the distinction of
the Asiatic from the European form of the grey-lag goose, is the supposed bright red base
of the upper mandible!

This alleged characteristic is founded on an extremely strange error; the authors who,
quoting Dr. С. Т. Radde *—the sole source whence they derived this information—putting an
entirely wrong interpretation on what my late respected friend wrote. The same essential
mistake was made by Taczanowski, and, probably after him, by Count Salvadori and others.

The passage in Dr. Radde’s account may be literally translated as follows : “In this bird
I notice that around the base of the upper mandible there is a very conspicuous rusty brown
colour, which passes, as a narrow band, beset with numerous white feathers, embracing the
base of the bill, into a fiery foxy red. Further, the whole bill of the bird was dingy white.
Otherwise our bird completely agrees with European specimens.” ‘Thus this fiery rufous
colour of the feathering at the base of the bill has been transferred by certain authors to
the base itself of the bill—a mistake which has given rise to a whole series of erroneous
interpretations and deductions.

In view of what is stated above, and as I do not find a single character by which it is
possible to distinguish the oriental from the western representatives of the grey-lag, I decide
to regard Ч ие’ rubrirostris—by some considered a separate form—as a mere synonym
of Auser anser, as has already been done by Mr. Oates.?

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

Seeing that I place the western and eastern forms of this Species together, the
determination of the extent of its distribution becomes a considerably less complex matter
than it would be if there really existed two different forms of erey-lag goose. The
species breeds from Iceland in the west to the Ussuri district in the east, as well as in

1 Faune orntthologigue de la Sibérie orientale.

2 526. Rezs. il. р. 358: “Auch an diesem Vogel sehe ich um die Oberschnabelbasis einen recht eclatanten rostbraunen Ton sich
verbreiten, der auf einem schmalem, vielfach von weissen Federchen durchsetztem Bande, welches die Schnabelbasis einfasst, zu brennendem
_ Fuchsroth gesteigert wird. Ausserdem war der ganze Schnabel dieses Vogels schmutzig weiss,”

3 The Game Birds of India, Part Il. р. 42 (1899). 7

Grey-Lag Goose 31

Kamchatka, as is testified by both Pallas and Krasheninnikov, who quote the native names
under which it is known in the latter peninsula. In Siberia, this species ascends to the
Arctic circle only along the Obi, whence, to the east, the northern limit of its breeding-grounds
rapidly descends and hardly anywhere eastward of 80° E. long. oversteps 56° N. lat. To
determine the southern limit of its nesting over this vast area is very difficult. Apparently,
however, the grey-lag goose breeds in Spain, and over the whole northern shore of the
Mediterranean, throughout Transcaucasia, and in Persia. It has not been yet found,
even wintering, in the north-eastern corner of Africa, neither has it been met with breeding
in India, where, as we shall see, it winters in enormous numbers. Przewalski found it breed-
ing on Lob-Nor, and it nests everywhere in Turkestan. As to European Russia, there is no
doubt that at a comparatively recent date there were far fewer spots where the grey-lag was
not known to breed than there are now. It is also beyond doubt that with every year the area
of its nidification is rapidly contracting in accordance with the growth of the population,
and also in consequence of the rapid strides in the diminution of inland waters. On all
sides lakes and fens are drying up or being destroyed; rivers are lacking water, and the
secure and open situations so absolutely necessary for the propagation of this very timid and
shy bird are constantly becoming fewer and fewer. We learn from the Pfitsy Rossid of
Prof. Menzbier that this goose no longer breeds in Poland, that it has been expelled from the
Tula Government ; while from Mr. Lorenz we know that not only does the grey-lag no longer
breed in the Moscow Government, but that it is not now to be met with there even on
migration. Apparently, indeed, there are many other places in European Russia where this
bird has already ceased to breed. In European Russia, the northern limit of its breeding-
grounds crosses the Arctic circle and reaches as far as the Varanger Fjord.

Messrs. Alston and Harvie-Brown* saw many of these geese in the neighbourhood of
Archangel, and as they left this locality in July, it is clear that the birds were nesting.

Farther to the south, it is found along the shore of the Gulf of Bothnia.

“The latter region extends into Finland proper, where the grey-lag breeds in the broad —
coast zone of the Gulfs of Bothnia and Finland, being common in the Uleaborg Government
and scarce farther south,” writes Prof. Menzbier. Whether this bird occurs on migration in
the interior of Finland I cannot say, although I have observed for several years running flights
of geese and swans on one of the lakes of the Vyborg Government. I have not once seen
specimens, but from inquiries among the inhabitants, I conclude that at times, although
rarely, large bean-geese (A/efsdénhanhz), lighter in colour than the common type, alight on
their passage. It is well known that the grey-lag nests here and there among the lakes of
the Baltic provinces. Its breeding in the St. Petersburg Government is now thoroughly
established. For instance, as I am informed by Mr. У. L. Bianchi, at the “ Seraya Loshad ”
headland, Peterhof district, three or four pairs yearly build their nests, and the young are
then reared by the peasants. Thus, on July 7, 1900, three broods of 7, 5, and 12 birds
were observed there; and 4 goslings of the size of the mother shot. This goose un-
doubtedly breeds also at the present time in the Governments of Pskov, Novgorod, Kiev,
Chernigov, Bessarabia, on the swampy eyots of the Dniester and Dnieper, and over the whole
of South Russia including the Crimea, the lower reaches of the Don, the whole of the Northern
Caucasus (Kuban, Terek, etc.), the Manych Steppe,’ Transcaucasia, and the islands (and pre-
sumably shores) of the Caspian. It is very abundant in suitable spots of Transcaspia, as,

1. 7025, 1873; р. 70.
? That geese breed on the Manych Steppe is an undoubted fact, but of what species I could not ascertain, although they can only

be grey-lag,

32 Geese of Europe and Asia

e.g., in the Merv oasis, where, moreover, it is a constant resident, and where the inhabitants
keep wild geese in large numbers reared from young in down taken alive or hatched from
collected eggs. Even in Persia, one of the important winter haunts of this bird, it breeds
and is resident in some spots. As has been already said, we also find it nesting throughout
Turkestan. Returning to European Russia, we find it breeding in the Governments of
Yaroslavl, Vladimir, Simbirsk, Kazan, Voronezh, along the whole of the middle and lower
Volga (here in large quantities’), and throughout the Cis and Trans-Ural. Great numbers
also breed in the Governments of Orenburg, Ufa, Kostroma, Perm, Yekaterinburg (especially
large flocks), and Vyatka. In the central and southern Governments, save perhaps a few
isolated spots, wherever there are suitable open places, the grey-lag breeds even now. During
migration, indeed, it is probably met with over the whole of Russia, although, as we have
already said, it is apparently no longer found in the Moscow Government; but if it is not
seen there even on migration, this is not enough to prove that it does not pass over that
district. Most probably it no longer alights there during its flight, that is, does not drop to
rest. I have already stated in general terms that in Siberia, from the lower course of the Obi,
where the breeding-grounds overstep the Arctic circle, their northern limit falls rapidly towards
the east. Thus we know roughly that the species nests in the Tomsk region, thence on to Lake
Baikal and Transbaikalia, Northern Mongolia, the upper waters of the Amur, and the whole
of the Ussuri district. Ihe determination of a more exact northern or southern boundary
to the breeding-grounds of this species on the Asiatic continent is not, however, at present
possible. There is no doubt that to the south of the points mentioned it nests in abundance;
but the question is how far to the south it descends for this purpose. If the expedition to
the Altai, under Prof. N. F. Kashchenko, in 1898, did not meet with this goose, this by no
means proves that it does not nest there at all. The Altai is an extensive region, and no
doubt spots may be found there perfectly adapted to this species, which breeds in the whole
of Zungaria. Inthe Thian Shan I observed considerable numbers, not only in the foot-
hills, in the valley of the Ili, but at a height of 7000 feet, on the Yuldus plateau, and do not
doubt that it occurs everywhere on suitable waters. In Mongolia, as we shall see later,
Przewalski found it breeding. The opinion that it does not nest but merely winters in
China seems to me extremely doubtful ; and although it winters in China in large numbers,
it may be confidently supposed that it breeds there in places, and also is here and there a
permanent resident. As to India, it must be supposed that this country only serves as
winter quarters for a number of grey-lag bred in more northern regions of Asia, especially
Siberia and the whole of Turkestan.

I will now endeavour to indicate as briefly as possible the breeding-grounds and
winter haunts of this goose in other districts. Besides the whole of the continent of Western
Europe, where it breeds universally, wherever conditions permit, we know that the grey-lag
nests in numbers in the north of Norway on all the islands adjacent to the mainland.
In Iceland, Messrs. Pearson found young goslings of this species on July 1, 2, and 3,
1894. Formerly it bred plentifully on Lake Sorvaag, in Farée, but it has long since been
driven away by the inhabitants, so that it is now met with only during its two migrations.
In Great Britain it was formerly an ordinary resident, but at the present time it is no longer
found either in England proper or in Wales or Ireland, but only in the more northerly
portion of Scotland and in the Hebrides. In Spain, especially in the marismas and lagunas
of the southern half of the country, grey-lags are found in considerable numbers, while they

" “ Priroda 1 Okhota,” 1875, Feb. and March, Primorskaga Okhota pod Astrakhanyu.

_ Grey-Lag Goose 33

winter there in such masses that Mr. А. Chapman states, in one of his most charming books,
that he saw in Spain in one day probably more of these geese than arrive in England during
scores of years. The grey-lag also winters on the larger Mediterranean islands, where
it may occasionally nest. In Tangiers and Algeria this bird is met with in winter, but, as
we have already said, it does not occur on the north-eastern coast of Africa. It has also
been stated to be unknown in Asia Minor, but this I very much doubt, seeing that, although
there are no direct indications of its wintering on the southern shores of the Black Sea,
[am firmly convinced the grey-lag must winter here, and that too in large numbers. Other-
wise there is no explanation of the destination of the large flocks which leave their winter
quarters on the coasts of the Crimea and Sivash in severe and snowy winters. As we
have already said, a large number winter in Persia, and in the central part of the country are
found nesting in the depression of Seistan (Zarndny). The species not unfrequently
winters in Afghanistan. In Eastern Turkestan it breeds and is locally resident, as likewise
in Kashgar; and in the Himalaya, Nepal, Kulu, and Kashmir the grey-lag is met with in
winter up to an altitude of 6000 feet. In India itself the numbers wintering are enormous,
but I do not know of any authentic case of its breeding there.

This is what Przewalski' says of the grey-lag: “It is found breeding in South-
eastern Mongolia and in the valley of the Yellow River. Here, in the reeds of Tsaidamin-
Nor, we found at the end of July, besides young birds nearly ready to fly, old ganders
moulted to such an extent that they were quite incapable of flight, and only escaped from
our dog’s pursuit by running; in doing so these ganders had recourse to various ruses, as,
for example, doubling back or making abrupt turns on one side, in order to conceal their
track, and, in the last resource, crouching down among the tussocks.

‘In the spring the species described appeared in South-eastern Mongolia in the
middle of March, perhaps even earlier; in Tsaidam the first arrivals were noticed on
February 18.

“On Koko-Nor gumenniki? were not rare in the last third of March; in the middle
of October we also still saw here a few pairs on migration. In the valley of the Khuan-khe
the autumn flight began from the end of August. In the mountainous region of Gan-su
this species was not found. In general, even during their migration, we noted here as
occasional visitors only six species of waterfowl, of which only one (A4mser indicus) breeds
on the upper waters of.the river Tetung.”

The same traveller further states that “in the basin of Lake Khanka, gumenniki
arrive in the middle of March, and breed in small numbers among the lakes. In autumn also
there are but few of this species compared with the great masses of other geese, especially

Anser minutus. ®

These data exhaust all that is known regarding the geographical distribution of the
отеу-[ао..

Passing on to the description of the habits of this species, it may be mentioned that,
as in the case of the mallard, if all that has been written on the subject were brought
together, it would exceed in volume all our information on the other geese taken together.
On this account I shall confine myself to noting only the most essential points in regard to its

1 Mongoliya t strana tangutov, п. р. 149 (1876). 3
Przewalski always calls the grey-lag gumenntk, by which name it is known almost everywhere in Siberia.
3 Anser finmarchicus of the present work.

2 Our italics.

F

5 = Geese of Europe and Asia

mode of life, breeding, migrations, and winter quarters ; and I do not undertake to give an
exhaustive statement of all that is known in these respects, since the compilation would
occupy too much time and labour.

Passing over, then, such attributes and habits of this species as are common to geese
in general, I have endeavoured to discuss in some detail those which are peculiar to the

erey-lag.

The grey-lag arrives at its breeding-grounds earlier or later, according to the
latitude in which these are situated. In the temperate zone the geese appear as early as
February or the beginning of March; later in the more northerly, and earlier in the more
southerly districts, although, on the whole, the birds may be said to arrive in the early spring.

They almost always come in considerable flocks, cackling incessantly, and immediately
on arrival proceed to look for suitable places for building their nests.

The older birds, although flying in the general flock, are already paired, as, like the
swans, grey-lags pair once for all. The young birds begin to pair immediately on arriving
at the spot; this being usually accompanied by fights among the ganders of the same age,
and the pursuit of females by males, as occurs in ducks. The younger birds which are not
yet sufficiently mature to breed, hold aloof from the adults in separate small flocks, although
in the neighbourhood of the breeding-grounds of the latter. When the site has not under-
gone any essential change since the previous year, the geese usually occupy the same places
for their nests as before, perhaps even the same tussocks and bushes where last year’s
nests* were situated. In densely populated localities the grey-lags usually build their nests
in the safest and least accessible spots, where man’s foot appears but rarely or not at all;
if in the neighbourhood of great lakes, they usually nest at a considerable distance from
the shore, or on islands overgrown with vegetation and surrounded by deep water, in moist
places, or in such reedy recesses as are most secure from man on account of their in-
accessibility. In desolate regions, where the geese feel themselves relatively safe, they may
be met with breeding even on small streams, whose banks are overgrown with rushes or
other tall or thick vegetation sufficient to hide the nest, and later on, in case of danger, the
young goslings. Along such small streams I have occasionally started pairs of old birds
from their nests in the valleys of the Ili among the foot-hills of the Thian-Shan.

The nest is built by both parents with all kinds of dry materials—reeds, kuga, chakan
(sedges and rushes), stems and twigs of various bushes, leaves of steppe-grass, etc., according
to the surrounding vegetation; no small amount of such material going to form a single nest.
A great heap of it is gradually piled up, sometimes to a foot in height and as much as three
feet in diameter, on the top of which is the hollow itself. Although the nest is constructed
by both parents, incubation apparently falls to the lot of the female alone, although the
opinion also exists that during the absence from the nest of the latter the male temporarily
takes her place, a view which to me personally seems extremely unlikely. Of course, the
lining immediately under the eggs is formed of down from the breast of the female, with
which the former are also covered when the parent leaves the nest. During the hatching of
her brood by the female, the gander never strays far away, and watchfully guards his future
progeny. |
The nest of the grey-lag is thus not built in the true sense of the word, but is simply
a piled-up heap of all kinds of rubbish, and if there be a trace of structural art in its arrange-

' This is frequently the case with some of the ducks.

Grey-Lag Goose 35

ment, this consists in the employment of stronger material for the foundation and lighter
stuff for the superstructure. In such a nest the female lays from 4 to 12, and even, as a
rare exception, as many as 14 eggs. The older the female the greater the number of eggs
in her nest; but this, of course, applies only to a certain limit of age, which, owing to the
extreme longevity of geese in general, it is impossible to determine.

The following is the table of dimensions and weight drawn up by Мг. СОБ on
the basis of 51 eggs of the grey-lag :— |

Max. breadth 65.5 mm. (= 2.57 in.) and 87 mm. length (= 3.42 in.)—weight ? (European Russia).

Min. joo Seer 2-10. yp a ge О.о » (= 3.38 ,, weight 1524 сет. (Astrakhan).
Max. НС OES By a7 ы о о ORO 1 Gama Ser).
Min. Taya a Е wine n = 2324) ee) к 1620 ,, (Turkestan).
Max. eet 2442 cgm. with 62 mm. breadth (= 2.44 in.) and 89 mm. length (= 3.50 in.) (Orenburg).
White”, een ro, ae с Cee FPS sheet On es eee a Зы Oa aur)

Mean breadth 60.3 mm. ( = 2.37 in.) ; max. breadth 65.5 mm. (= 2.57 in.) ; min. breadth 53.5 mm. (= 2.10 in.).

ro length 733.27 Sion Ge Оле Е т
» Weight 2002 cgm.; » weight 2442 сет. ; » weight 1470 сэт.

The shell is rather smooth, and the colour white or creamy or sometimes greenish
white; but, on the whole, they are very like the eggs of domestic geese. Radde’s state-
ment, that the shell is sometimes coarser and rougher, at others smooth,? is probably founded
on wrongly determined eggs collected by natives.

According to Severtsov, many grey-lags breed in the Voronezh Government (up to
1853); they lay in April, the young becoming fledged between July 15 and August 20.

These dates may be regarded as normal for the whole of the central zone of Russia
and Europe generally; but farther north the later the geese lay—the eggs, for example,
in Lapland not being laid till May.

On the Burani Islands, in the Caspian, eggs were found on April 18, which,
according to Dr. Radde, had already been incubated about a week, and consequently must
have been laid early in April. In Persia these geese lay still earlier. The time of hatching
is usually stated at 28 days.

It would be interesting to ascertain whether the quantity of down in the nest
diminishes as the breeding-grounds approach the south, as has been observed in the case
of certain species of ducks.

It is, however, probable that this is so, since it is evident, for example, that in the
case of geese breeding in the north, sometimes in almost winter conditions, when snow lies
all round, it is necessary that the eggs should be covered more warmly during the absence of
the female from the nest than in more southerly climates.

Let us now suppose the 27 to 28 days to have passed, and the goslings, covered with
short but thick down, to have broken out of the eggs. Although, according to some
observers, on leaving the egg the goslings still remain in the nest several days® before their
mother takes them to water, we have grounds for thinking that this is not quite true, and
that they take their first bath not later than one day after birth. Again, it may be admitted

1 Taczanowski gives the dimensions of eggs of the grey-lag from Dauria, as breadth 58—59 mm., length 79.6-89 mm., so that these
eggs are much inferior in size to European specimens.

2 Szbtr. Reise, п.
8 Thus Vavilov in his Okhota 9 Rossiz, iv. р. 39

36 Geese of Europe and Asia

that the warmer the climate the sooner after leaving the egg do the goslings make acquaint-
ance with water. At first the young birds nip off the tender tops of various water-weeds
projecting above the surface, but the mother soon tries to lead them away to a green bank or
an island, where they begin to graze in the fashion they will follow for the rest of their lives.
Towards nightfall the brood returns to the nest, where the young are kept warm under the
wings of the mother. Such is the daily life of the young brood until the goslings have
grown so large that they cannot find room beneath their mother’s wings; but even after
this they still pass several nights huddled close to her body. The brood usually goes to
feed in the following order: in front the goose, and in her wake the goslings, crowded closely
together; somewhat to the rear stalks the gander, with neck outstretched, constantly turning
to one side or the other, and keeping a sharp look-out for any threatening danger or sus-
picious object. Notwithstanding this watchfulness, in case of actual danger the gander is
the first to take wing with a loud cackle, or rather cry, full of fear, leaving the care of
saving his children to the female, which, it must be owned, fulfils her duty with complete
self-sacrifice. Her first care in the presence of danger is indeed to hide her young wherever
possible in the grass or undergrowth, and if there be water at hand the brood will sometimes
rush in headlong and seek safety in diving.

If agosling be caught and removed from the brood, it is said that the mother will fly
at the robber and pursue him for а considerable distance. Both goslings and old birds when
they wish to hide will lie down flat on the ground, with neck stretched out to its full length ;
this being the habit of large but not yet fully fledged young birds and moulting old ones,
although it is not peculiar to the grey-lag, but common to all geese. In case of the death of
the parents, the goslings usually join other broods, and are willingly received by the parents
of the latter. |

Naumann relates а somewhat strange trait in the life of the grey-lag—namely, that
sometimes the geese will fly off with their offspring from a large sheet of water to a smaller
one, and back again, without visible cause, but with extraordinary persistence and obstinacy.
When they have decided to abandon any particular water, they carry out their intention at
any cost, even if all the goslings should perish in doing so. The feeble young in down,
when hardly two weeks old, are transferred by the parents to other waters lying within a
two or three hours’ march across the open fields, or along country roads, past mills, and even
through settlements, so that, in such apparently aimless wanderings, the young often perish
from the assaults of rapacious foes, or simply from the hardships of the journey. Even if
the goslings are caught and reinstated several times on the waters whence the parents had
taken them, the latter do not abandon their senseless conduct, but again obstinately carry
off their offspring. An attempt has been made to explain such persistency on their part by
the instinct of the geese to abandon waters which, according to a presentiment, will dry up
in the course of the year; but it is more probable, I think, that the tendency to wander in
these birds is caused by the desire to find safer and less accessible spots for the moulting of
the old birds—a habit which, as we know, is common to the representatives of the genus
Melanonyx, and has been described in Seebohm’s Siberia in Eurofe. In any case, it
must be presumed that one and the same incentive causes the wanderings of grey-lag and
bean-geese (A7e/anonyx), and probably other species. аз well.

Of the first period in the life of the goslings Vavilov gives us a very true picture,
which I here quote in full. ‘At first the goslings eat bog-nuts and various water-plants.
They feed at dawn and sunset, and then it is they quit their stronghold and swim out into

Grey-Lag Goose Se

the-open water. I have often had occasion to observe the geese at this time. The female
first shows her head out of the reeds, takes a rapid glance round, listens a moment,
and having assured herself that all is quiet, descends with a low cackle to the water; the
goslings follow her in a crowd, the gander bringing up the rear... . They next come out
on the bank, and proceed to satisfy their hunger; but the gander has no time for eating—
he snatches a mouthful or two and then listens. No sooner has he noticed something
suspicious than he at once begins a low cackle to warn his family; if the danger has passed,
he again utters his low note, but now in a different and more soothing tone than at first ;
In the opposite event, with a loud cry he betakes himself to flight, wholly forgetful of his
offspring.”

When the goslings are fairly grown up and almost fully fledged, the old birds moult
—the ganders somewhat the earlier, and after them the geese,—and, having simultaneously
lost all their primary and secondary wing-feathers, they become, like the ducks, perfectly
helpless. Knowing this, they duly retire to still safer strongholds, where they pass this
dangerous but not very prolonged period of their life.

This precaution does not, however, always save them, and a great multitude of
moulting geese, both old birds and partially fledged young, fall into the hands of man.

All the geese which fall to the gun, together with those taken as they alight, are very
few compared with the number of fully fledged birds driven into fixed nets, and then taken
by hand or killed with sticks or dogs, throughout the length and breadth of Russia and
the adjacent countries. It is true that among the number the grey-lag is not the chief or
exclusive victim, but this species is destroyed in large numbers, especially if we take into
account the widely spread collecting of its eggs in spring.

When the young geese have grown their flight-feathers and the old birds are fully
fledged, they begin to fly out to the fields to feed, sometimes in separate broods, at other
times in parties; and it sometimes happens that their feeding-grounds are far removed from
their places of refuge. In central and southern Russia the flight of the geese to the fields
begins about the middle of July.

Severtsov states, for example, that in the Voronezh Government the young birds
leave between July 15 and August 20, and, ‘‘until the time of their departure, fly first to feed
in the oat-fields and then to the young crops of winter corn, in flocks gradually increasing
in numbers. Only the migrating flocks present the characteristic wedge. They may be seen
throughout the first half of October. The direction of flight is south-west. The migration
of these geese coincides with the autumn arrival of user segetum and A. torquatus.” |

We owe to Vavilov the following life-like description of these foraging expeditions.
“А little later the separate broods combine to form flocks; and from this moment the geese
no longer fall such an easy prey to the fowler. Such gaggles feed in the corn-fields, especially
buckwheat, peas, and oats. Having once selected a field, they constantly fly to it, even
continuing to visit it after the harvest to glean the scattered grain. At this period the
geese live a life of ease and luxury. With sundown they fly to the field, crowding the
crops to an incredible extent, and at the call of the old birds rising heavily and making for
the lonely lake to pass the night. They always fly by the same route, and as soon as they
reach water at once descend and devote their first attention to slaking their thirst, and then
swim to the selected open shore, where they get out, lie down, and fall asleep. The
old birds alone do not sleep, but divide the watches, and if they hear anything suspicious,

т Melanonyx arvensis and Branta bernicla of this book.

38 Geese of Europe and Asia

at once wake the whole flock with a loud cry of warning, and in an instant fly up into
tlic arian A.

“After a doze of an hour or two, long before dawn the geese on guard wake their
sleeping companions, and again the whole flock flies off to the favourite field, where it
remains till early morning. Having taken their fill, the geese now fly to another lake,
where they pass the day. In the evening they again fly to the field, and so on till their
departure.”

This description gives a perfectly true general picture of the life of grey-lags until
they leave for winter quarters, and I have only to complete it by a few details. Thus, for
example, in some cases great rivers with extensive shoals along their banks take the place
of the lakes mentioned by Vavilov; and, as regards food, this is considerably more various
than is allowed by that observer. Geese feed, indeed, on the grain of wheat, rye, and maize,
as well as on chaff or husks, peas, beans, and lentils; but green fields of rye form their
favourite food. In the south the grey-lag visits the paddy-fields, which offer such attractive
feeding-grounds for many waterfowl and for different waders, on account of the abundance
of animal food.

According to some authors, geese do not relish vetches, which are reputed to be
harmful to them. Acorns they consume very eagerly, and they are also not averse to feed
on all kinds of kitchen-garden plants, and in particular their juicy roots. They eat
turnips and potatoes. Young goslings are very fond of water-weeds, such as Lemna,
Festuca fluitans, etc., while on the seashore when wintering grey-lag readily devour
Zostera maritima, the favourite food of all geese and ducks. Undoubtedly, young goslings
eagerly swallow all kinds of insects, leeches, and small crustaceans that fall in their way.

Sitting on the water, geese obtain food from a small depth either by immersing the
whole neck or the fore part of the body, taking up a position perpendicular to the surface
of the water, after the fashion of surface-feeding ducks, so that only the hind half of the
body and the tail is exposed. Very often, to facilitate digestion, they fill their crops with
coarse sand, and even with black earth. The droppings of grey-lag geese are very hot, and
dry up the grass for a considerable distance around. These droppings and the scored
grass often betray the feeding-grounds of the geese to the fowler.

As winter approaches, little by little the geese begin to move south, with the exception,
of course, of resident birds, which never change their abode. |

The flight of geese is either continuous and uninterrupted, or gradual, with more ог
less prolonged halts at convenient feeding-grounds. In general the autumn movement from
cold to warm countries is much slower than the spring flight, effected as a rule rapidly,
often without stopping, till the breeding-grounds are reached.

Before noticing the grey-lag’s winter quarters, a few words may be devoted to its
cries. The goose’s cackle is more or less well known to all, but only the fowler who has
seen and shot many of these birds is able to distinguish with certainty one goose from
another by its cry alone. As to the question whether it is possible to express these different
cackles on paper, since I have already more than once denied this in my Utki Rossi, 1
must again do so here. In confirmation of the impossibility of representing the goose’s
call by letters, I cite the following example. Personally I hold that the grey-lag utters on
the wing the sounds gaga-gaga-gaga, just as is done by the bean-goose (Melanonyx arvensis) ;
but English authors often express these sounds as houh-houk, the Germans as kaahkakak,
kahkak, kakakahkak. \Nhich is right? Of course all depends here on the intonation and

Grey-Lag Goose 39

quality of the sound with which these syllables are pronounced. The loud cry of alarm
of the grey-lag is very distinct from its quiet cackle on the wing or its low converse with
its mate, or, finally, the thundering cackle of a large flock. On the whole, the individual
loud cries have a trumpet-like metallic sound, which defies even approximate expression.
To recognise the note of the grey-lag, even from afar, is, however, not difficult, and it cannot
be confused with any other bird’s cry.

Assuming the geese to have arrived at their winter quarters, we may now discuss
how they pass this dull time in their lives. For this purpose we may take the following
excellent description by Mr. Zhitnikov of the wintering of geese on the river Atrek in the
Transcaspian territory: “Аз regards the winter mode of life of the grey-lag, it presents the
opposite of that of the lively, active, lesser white-fronted goose (4mser jinmarchicus). As
the latter is regular in its habits, so the wintering grey-lag is languid and inactive, and the
character of its life in this period is not clearly ascertainable on account of the lack of system
and order. Until the appearance of the inundations of the aryks (irrigation canals) the geese
pass whole days in dense growths of reeds, surrounded by quagmires, and inaccessible alike
for man and beast; only rarely do individual flocks wander about the steppe or in the
paddy-fields, without any periodicity in time. As soon, however, as the land becomes over-
flowed, the geese return and spend whole days there, sometimes remaining for the night ©
and sometimes returning to the reeds for the sake of a change. In spring their mode
of life is somewhat more regular. Among many specimens of ordinary size and weight
there occurred at times remarkably large representatives of the Asiatic erey-lag (duser
стегеиз rubrivostris*). The weight varied between 7 and 12 pounds.”

According to Dr. Radde, between September and March the grey-lags keep in great
flocks on the Sivash, feeding on the steppe, and flying thence to the ice-free waters of the
Samir and Kara-sa; but excessively deep snow compels them sometimes to abandon the
Sivash, as happened in the year 1853.

It is very probable that the geese Kessler was told of, as wintering in the Crimea in
the Sheikhlar Gulf, belong partly to this species. Personally, although there is no direct
evidence of it, I have no doubt that, driven back by foul weather, cold and snow, the grey-
lags migrate from the Sivash and the Crimea generally to the southern shores of the Black
Sea, which must be crowded with other species also, especially the lesser white-fronted and
the red-breasted goose. |

It would be unpardonable not to quote here the excellent observations of Mr. A. O.
Hume on the winter life of grey-lag in India, the more so that they contain some details
which I have purposely omitted in order to avoid repetitions, of which even so the present
work has its share. I have ventured to somewhat abbreviate Mr. Hume’s sketch.

“This species rarely appears in Upper India before the last week in October, and
farther south the first week in November is, I think, the earliest time for their arrival. In
some years they are a good week or ten days later. Everywhere many, I believe, leave
the country during the first week in March, ... and I have shot them once as late as
April то. . . . Where geese are much shot at, they feed in the meadows and fields exclus-
ively during the hours of darkness, but where comparatively unmolested, you will find them

1 Г have already stated above that size is no distinctive character of the Asiatic form, and that in Europe geese are met with of
greater size and weight than in Asia,

40 Geese of Europe and Asia

grazing in the young wheat till 9 o’clock in the morning, and back again at their pastures
by 4 P.M.

“When not out feeding they spend their time dozing or dawdling about on the
margin of some lake or the bank of some river, always by preference choosing some island
in these for their noontide siesta. Unless disturbed, they very rarely take to the water;
where you seea flock swimming about in mid-stream of one of our larger rivers, or in the
open water of some broad, between the hours of ten and three, you may generally safely
conclude that they have been recently fired at, or frightened in some way.

“They feed exclusively, so far as my experience goes, on tender shoots of grass,
young corn, and other spring crops, and on grain of all kinds—gram, when nearly ripe,
being a great attraction to them. Generally, they are pretty well on the alert when feeding
inland, but in parts of the country where the people have no guns, and there are no native
or European sportsmen about, they get very bold; and when put up at one end of a
field, flutter lazily away and settle a couple of hundred yards away in another field, and give
the cultivators a good deal of trouble, since three or four hundred of these birds will clear
off an incredible amount of grain in a morning. In such localities you may with a
common blanket, donned native-fashion over head and body, walk up to within thirty yards
of a flock, and then judiciously startling them get a couple of effective shots into the mass
as it rises. In such cases never fire until they have risen, and are about the level of your
face. A shot on the ground, amongst the crops, with an ordinary twelve-bore, may yield
three, generally only two, often only one ; the same shot fired when the flock is on the wing,
and about your level, will account for from five to eight. I have often got ten, and once
or twice more, with two barrels in such cases.

“Where, however, they have been once thus shot at, you will not get near them again
for some time without further precautions, but even when on the alert you may often stalk
them behind a horse and get to within forty or fifty yards. In such cases it is best to make
sure of your one or two birds on the ground with the first shot, as you will seldom have
time for more than one shot after they rise.

“ Although they rise rather awkwardly and slowly, with violent and noisy flappings
of their wings, they fly very strongly and easily when once well off, and I do not knowa
more beautiful sight than the sudden and rapid descent of a large flock from high in the
air to some sandbank. ‘The flock comes along in sober state, circles round decorously once

or twice, and then suddenly, as though all hands had been piped to skylark, down they come
with incredible rapidity, twisting and turning, with an ease and grace for which no one could
at other times have given them credit. They swim well, no doubt, and dive when hard
pressed fairly well, though they cannot keep long under water. .

“When moving any considerable distance they fly high, and usually in a single line,
or ina >, with the point foremost; but when merely changing ground they often fly in an
irregular flock.

“They are met with in parties of all sizes, from a single pair to more than a thousand,
but flocks of from thirty to a hundred are most commonly seen in Upper India. All our
geese prefer rivers to tanks and lakes, but of all the species the grey-lag is least rarely
seen about these latter.” |

Of crosses in the wild state between the grey-lag and other species I know nothing,
but that the wild bird breeds freely enough with its domesticated relations is well known.
Tame grey-lag pair with domestic Chinese geese (Cyguopsts cygnoides), and also with white-

Grey-Lag Goose > 4.1

fronts kept in confinement, which should not cause surprise if we bear in mind what
unexpected and yet undoubted crosses are met with between ducks of different breeds.

In conclusion, I venture to state that I find a great analogy between the grey-lag and
the other geese on the one hand, and the mallard and the other ducks of Eastern Europe
on the other. |

Thus, the geographical distribution of the grey-lag and that of the mallard in Russia
are very similar. Both birds only in rare cases pass the Arctic circle to breed; both are
found nesting almost throughout the whole of the Russian territory, and breed everywhere
down to the southern boundary of their range; and, finally, the two are respectively the
wild ancestors of our domesticated geese and ducks.

Mr. Е. Coburn, in his article in the Zoologist for February 1903, р. 46, when
endeavouring to prove that 4user rubrivostris, Swinhoe, is a distinct species, and that this
bird strays to Great Britain, is scarcely convincing; and I think I have made quite clear in
the present section that this so-called species has no existence.

THE WHITE-FRONTED GOOSE
ANSER ALBIFRONS, ЭСОРОТЛ
Ре

English—White-fronted Goose; Laughing Goose; Tortotse-shell Goose, Barred Goose.
In North America: AHarleguin Brant; Pied Brant; Prairie Brant;
Speckled Belly; Speckled Brant; Brant. In California: Yellow-legged Goose ;
Grey Brant.

Russian—Kazdrka and kozdrka; belolobaya kazdrka (and kozdrka); beloloby gus (book
name); Lazard and kozard (collective); atkaya guska; gusarka (Kharkov gov.,
teste Somov); fleshan (Turukhansk); pleshivka and lysushka (Perm. gov.);
varkdvy gus (teste Pallas, in Little Russia); kavgdrka (on Dnestr., acc. Brauner’) ;
gus kazanok? (Artsybashev).

Yakut—Lynglyuga or Lynglyya (on Boganida, Lena, and Vilyut).

Samoyed— Seer griin (on Kolguev, ¢este Trevor-Battye); Syatyko and dyontengya (on
Taimyr). |

Kirgiz and Bashkir—Kara-hazg.

Vogul—Lyak.*

French—Ove vieuse; Oye rieuse (Buffon); Оёе a front blanc.

German—Slassgans ; Mittlere Bldssengans,; Weisstirnige Gans; Lachgans; Lachende
Gans; Polnische Gans; Helsinggaus; Wilde Nordgans; Seegans; Trappgans ;
Kolgans.

Note.—Since, after a full consideration of the question whether the eastern form of white-fronted goose is distinguishable from the
western, I have come to the conclusion that it is not, I unite them under one name—Auser albifrons.

Below, after describing the different ages of these geese, I give the distinctive characters on which was founded the variety А ие’
gambeli, which I at any rate do not recognise. I accordingly cite the literature and synonyms, referring to these two forms, together.

Branta albifrons, Scopoli, Ann. I., Hist. Nat., р. 69 (1769).

Anser casarka, Gmelin, Reis. ii. р. 177, pl. 13 (1774); Gmelin, Putesh., ii. р. 144.

Anas albtfrons, Latham, Gen. Suppl., i. р. 297 (1787).

Anas septentrionalts sylvestris, Brisson, Orn., vi. р. 269 (1760). |

Anas albicans (errore), Gmelin, Syst. Маф, И. р. 516, No. 76 (1788); Bechstein, Orn. Taschenb., ii. р. 454,

No. 38 (1803).

Anas erythropus, Wahlberg, Schrift. Berl. Ges. Naturf. Fr., viii. pp. 75-91 (1788); Linn., Syst. Nat., i. р. 197
(partim) (1776).

Anas albifrons, Bonnaterre, Encyclop. Méthod,, i. р. 114 (1790); Bechstein, Gemein. Naturg. Deutschl., 2nd ed.,
ivenp. 99850809) Мене: Cat. Rais. р 56 (1832); Naumann, Убе. Deutschl., хи. р. 351, pl. 289

А i <b Se asl Ri ee ee ee ee

1 Evidently some of these names are given to the lesser white-front, where they are not distinguished.

2 The other native names quoted by Pallas for his A. erythropus | refer to the lesser white-front, under which head the reader will
find them.

42

White-fronted Goose 4.3

(1842); Middendorff, Reis, Ost.-Sib., И. р. 227 (1853); Radde, Reis. S.-O. Sib, ii. р. 358 (1863);
Nordmann, J. f. Orn. 1864, р. 376 (Fennia); Degland and Gerbe, Orn. Europ., ii. р. 483 (1867);
Shelley, Birds Egypt, p. 280 (1872); Severtsov, Vert. Goriz. Turk. Zhiv., pp. 70, 149 (1873); 24., Period.
yavl. Zh. Zhiv. Vor gub. (1855); Radde, Ornis. Саис., р. 444 (1884); Zarndny, Orn. Е. Orenb. Кг.
220 Looe), 72, Боро. Om, Е. ОЕ kr, В. to7 (1897) + м. Orn, Е. Zakaspiisk: kr, р, 436 (1890),
Gobel, Убо. Kreis. Uman, р. 207 (1879); Sabaneev, Ukaz. St. ОКВ. Zool. Sod., рр. 455-458 (1883);
24., Prolet Gusei, “Zh. Г. ОБ. Okh.,” 1874, 1., ii.; Brauner, Zam. о Pt. Kryma, р. 23 (1893); 4, Zam. о
Pt. Khers. g., р. 70 (1894); Palmén, Notiser pro Е. Fennica, xiv., 1875, pp. 353-355; Artsybashev,
Bull. Soc. I. М. Мозс., 1859, iii. р. 100; Yakovlev, Bull. Soc. Mosc, 356 (1872); Eversmann,
Г. Or. Кг. iii. p. 556 (partem) (1866); Kessler, Russk. Orn., р. 370 (1847); Menzbier, Pt. Ross., i. р.
734 (1895); 24., Рготуз|1. Pt. Ross. i Kavk., р. 46 (1902) ;* Nordmann, Faune Pont. pp. 285-286; Maak,
Amur, Prim., р. 144 (1859); Menzbier, Orn. Tulsk. ©. р. 84; Sabaneev, Bull. Soc. Мозс., 1871,
ii.; Ukhtomsky, Novaya Zemlya (1883), pp. 28-32 ; Finsch, Verh. z.-b. Ges. Wien, 1879, p. 260; Pleske,
ТВ. Убе. Kola Hlbns,, р. 244 (1886); м, Obz. Mlekop. Pt. Kolsk. poluostr., р. 346 (1887); Biichner,
Pt. Spb. gub., р. 513 (1884); Biichner and Pleske, Beitr. Orn. 5. Р. G. No. 178 (1881); Nikolsky,
Pozvon. Kryma, р. 289 (1891); Radde, Bull. Soc. Мовс., 1854, iii. р. 160; Radde, “ Vestnik
Yestestv. Nauk,” 1855, рр. 512, 629; Palmén, Caban. J. Е Orn., xxiv. р. 53 (1876); David and Oust.
Ois. Chine, р. 492 (1877); Dresser, Birds Eur., vi. р. 375, pl. 414 (1878); Sclater, Pr. Zool. Soc. Lond.,
1880, р. 500; Coues, Check-list, 2nd ed., р. ш. No. 692 (1882); Seebohm, Hist. Brit. Birds, iii. p. 505,
pl. бо (egg), 1885; Shatilov, Bull. Soc. Mosc, 1860, iv. р. 513; Bogdanov, Pt. Zver. Povolzh.,
р. 147 (1871); Hume and Marshall, Game Birds India, iii. р. 73 (pl.) (1879); Shatilov, “ Izv.
Ob. Lyub. Yestestv.,” x. 2, р. 94 (1874); Przewalski, Put. Uss. Кг. 1870; Kholodkov. i Silantiev, Pt.
Yevr., р. 523, pl. 42 (1901); Silantiev, Оргеа. Yevr. Pt. р. 112 (1901); Trevor-Battye, Ice-bound on
Kolguev, р. 207 (pullus), р. 423 (1895); Somov, Orn. Е. Khark. gub., р. 446 (1897); Ridgway, Man.
М. Am. Birds, р. 116 (1887); Gigl and Salvadori, Pr. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1887, р. 580 (Korea) ; Salvadori,
Cat. Birds Brit. Mus., xxvii. рр. 92-97 (1895); Oates, Man. Game Birds India, ii. р. 48 (1899);
Buturlin, Dikie Gusi Ross. Imp., “ Psov. i Ruzh. Okh.,” Feb.-Apr., 1901 ; 24., зераг., pp. 13-16; zd,
_ Sinopt. tabl. ОКВ. Pt. Ross. i, p. 45 (1901); 24, ТаЫ. Opred. Plastinchatokl., “Psov. i Ruzh. ОКВ.”
~ (1900); Palmén, Bidr. Sib. Ishafsk. Fogelf. Vega Exp., р. 415; Chapman, The Art of Wildfowling,
1800 (pro рае): Kuzsky, Sist, sp, Pt. Kaz о. (Га. ©. Yest, pr un. xxv. pt. 6, ps гта (08903),
Sushkin, Pt. Uf. gub. р. 68 (1897); Deryagin, Put. dol. Obi, Trud. I. Spb. Obshch. Yestestv.,
yOl. ххх. pii.2, 1808: м, (Gin, ды, Pskov--e). lr) В Spb: ‘Obsich. Vest, хо ixxvill epi 31097 )s
Johansen, Nauch, Ocherki Tomsk. Кг. 1898, О ptits., р. 65; Finn, How to Know Indian Ducks, р. 18
(1901); Chapman, Bird Life of the Borders, р. 212 (1889); Sharpe, Second Yarkand Miss. Aves,
р. 128 (1891); Payne-Gallwey, Letters to Young Shooters, 3rd Series, pro parte; Audubon, Orn.
_ Biogr,, iii. р. 568 (1835), pl. 186, $ 9 ; Seebohm, Birds Jap. Emp., р. 237 (1890); Cordeaux, British
Birds, Nests, Eggs, рр. 13, 58, with plate (1896); Pearson (fro parte), “Beyond Petsora,” 1899;
Khomyakov, Pt. Ryazan. gub., 1900, р. 33 (iz mater. F. i Fl. Ross, I, Otd. Zool., pl. 5); Coburn,
Zoologist, 1902, р. 337 ef seq.
_ Anser erythropus, Fleming, Brit. Ап., р. 121 (1828); Fritsch, Убе. Eur., р. 404, pl. 45, fig. 9 (1870).
Anser medius, Bruch, Isis, 1828, р. 732; Brehm, Naumannia, 1855, р. 297.
Anser bruchi, Brehm, Isis, 1830, р. 996 (пот. nudum); zd, Vog. Deutschl., р. 841 (1831); Fritsch, Убе.
Eur., р. 405, pl. 45, fig. 5 (1870).
Anser intermedius, Naumann, Убе. Deutschl., xi. р. 340, pl. 288 (1842); Somov, Orn. Е. Khark. gub.,
| р. 447 (1897) (сете, sec. descr., Juv.).
- Anser ватфдей, Hartlaub, Rev. et Mag. Zool., 1852, р. 7; Seebohm, Birds Jap. Emp, р. 237 (1890);
Buturlin, Zametka о nekotorykh ptitsakh Liflyandskoi gub., Dnevn. Zool. О. I. О. Lynb. Yest., vol.
iii. №. 3, р. 4 (1902); Coburn, Zoologist, 1902, р. 337 ef seg.
Anser тропу var. gambeli, Coues, Key N. Amer. Birds, р. 282 (1872); Baird and Ridgway, Water- Birds
М. Amer., 1. р. 448 (1884).
Anser frontalis, Baird, Birds М. Amer., р. 562 (1858).
Anser albifrons gambeli, Ridgway, Pr. U.S. Nat. Mus. 1880, р. 203; Stejneger, Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., No. 29,
рр. 145-317, pl. 11. fig. 2 (caput); Taczanowski, Faune Orn. Sib. Or, р. 1091 (1893); Ridgway,
Man. Birds М. Amer., р. 116 (1887); Stejneger, Ornith. Expl. Com. Isl. and Kamtsch., р. 145 (1887).
? Anser albifrons roseipes, Schlegel, Naumannia, 1855, pp. 254, 256, 257.
? Anser pallipes, Selys-Longchamps, Naumannia, 1855, р. 264 (war. domestica); Degl. and Gerbe, Orn. Eur.,
ii, р. 485 (1867),
? Anser albifrons a pallipes, Bonaparte, Conve -Кепа., xliii. р. 648 (1856).
? Anser brachyrhynchus, Swinhoe (nec ВаШоп), “ Ibis,” 1875, р. 456; Seebohm, Birds Jap. Emp., р. 236 (1890).

1 The figure in plate 133 of this work cannot, I think, refer to this species, but represents a young /mmarchicus with abnormal
colouring of the legs.

не Geese of Europe and Asia

ADULT MALE

Head and neck brown, colouring on cheeks and throat somewhat lighter than on
crown and nape; forehead and feathering along base of upper mandible and terminal part of
feathering of chin white, the latter being at times entirely white, but rarely without any white
at all, the difference being apparently unconnected with either sex or age. Width of white
blaze on forehead, which may vary in different individuals, oly 2m very vare cases reaches
the line joining anterior angles of eyes; in the vast majority of cases, however, the white
ceases considerably short of the above-mentioned line. On the whole, this white patch on
the forehead seldom has a breadth posteriorly of one inch (=25.4 mm.), as, for example, is
the case in a specimen from Livonia." White on forehead and sides of base of upper
mandible bordered behind with black, or, more seldom, blackish, gradually merging behind
into brown colouring of head.?, Whole of back and scapulars, as also tertiary wing-feathers,
dark greyish brown with whitish grey edgings. Rump dark brown or blackish ; upper tail-
coverts white; tail-feathers, sixteen,* greyish brown with white edges and tips.* Anterior
part of breast pale ashen grey with lighter edges to feathers; belly whitish, with more
or less numerous and variously sized black patches, which in perfectly adult (probably
even very old) specimens develop so much as to cover almost whole surface save hindmost
part, which, like the vent and all the lower tail-coverts, is pure white; flanks brown, with
broad pale edgings to feathers. мы

Upper lesser wing-coverts greyish brown; median and greater brown, with broad
white tips. Lower wing-coverts and axillaries dark greyish earthy colour. Outer primaries
and secondaries entirely brownish black, secondaries with narrow greyish edgings; shafts
of all primaries and secondaries, with exception of dark tips, white.

Here I consider it necessary to state that in the intensity of its general brown
colouring this goose is just as liable to individual variations as is the grey-lag (duser
anser); at the same time, so far as I can judge from the material examined, such variations
are not dependent on either sex or асе.’ Generally speaking, in all the geese individual
variations in colouring are considerable, and in the case of the pink-footed goose I point
out that, even in the young in down from one nest, the colouring shows considerable
differences between one specimen and another.

ADULT FEMALE

Differs, apparently, in no respect from the gander as regards colour, but is on the
whole somewhat inferior in size. I therefore quote the dimensions of the white-fronted
goose, without stating the sex; this being the less to be regretted, seeing that it did not
seem possible to give the limits for the maximum measurements of the female, on account
of the inadequate material.

I may also direct the attention of the reader to the fact that, although in the
extreme east of Russia individuals occur exceeding specimens of more westerly origin, yet
even there, alongside of larger birds, are to be met with specimens which by no means
excel European birds, notwithstanding their complete maturity. The bill in the eastern

1 Kindly communicated to me by Mr. Buturlin.

2 Specimens occur in which this black border is very feebly expressed, but oftener it is sharply marked.
3 Very possibly sometimes rising to eighteen.

4 Seemingly the white edge and tips of the tail-feathers become wider with the age of the bird.

5 Here, it seems, the time of year plays some part, as I always found fresh plumage darker and purer than is the case in spring
specimens, when the feathers near moulting are battered and faded.

White-fronted Goose 4.5

individuals, as is the case in the majority of the other species of geese, is, however, on the
whole (though not invariably) more robust. However, I consider there is not sufficient
ground to establish a separate race on the basis of such an unstable character; and I there-
fore regard all these geese from the Far East, such as 4user albifrons gambeli, as ordinary
white-fronted geese—A user albifrons.

The normal colouring of the bill in both sexes is a very pale whitish flesh-tint (varying
of course in depth), locally with a slight wash of blue and with yellow (orange) edges to the
nares, and with a median longitudinal streak on culmen (between nares), and the basal part
of rami of lower mandible of same colour. Nail white (rarely greyish white); the older
the bird, the purer being the white. Feet orange, with paler yellow membranes and whitish
claws; but sometimes a pink colour appears on the feet, as noticed by Naumann. This
pink or red colour of the feet explains the statement of such a constantly accurate observer
as Pallas that user erythropus (under which name he evidently confused this goose with
the lesser white-fronted goose) has “ pedes rubri,” z.e. red feet.

Iris in this species dark hazel or dark chestnut. Ceroma greyish, sometimes with
yellowish shade, or brownish grey, but never either lemon-yellow or orange, whereby the
white-fronted goose at all ages is sharply distinguished from the lesser white-fronted goose,
as described below. Dr. Sushkin informs me that in a specimen from the Turgai Territory,
which he considers to be a very old female, the edge of the eyelid was slightly yellowish and
perhaps hardly perceptibly swollen. In this specimen the orange tinge on the bill also was
more pronounced than usual.

ADULT (BUT мот OLD) BirpDs

Birds approximately from 3 to 4 years old have only the mental angle white.2 Yellow
spots on bill® hardly indicated. Sometimes these spots are blackish (dark slaty grey), and
it would seem that such specimens are occasionally quoted by authors as Anser inter-
medius, Naumann; for example, among others, by Mr. N. N. Somov, from the Kharkov
Government.

Younc Втво$ IN SECOND YEAR

These have the white on head far less developed in breadth, and the bill darkish grey,
with pink or fleshy shade and dingy greyish or greyish white nail. Black patches on
abdomen almost entirely wanting, or extremely small and few.

YounG Brrps IN First PLUMAGE

White feathering on head entirely absent and, both on top of forehead and along base
of upper mandible, replaced by black or brown-black. Bill yellow-grey or grey flesh-colour,
or grey with lilac tinge, and greyish nail. Feathers of under-part of body much narrower
(fully one-third) than in adults, and on upper surface feathers narrower and sharper than
in adults, as is apparently the case in all young geese of this age. On light-grey belly
(where black patches are always wanting) fairly regularly disposed grey speckles, resulting
from the fact that the feathers have grey centres.

1 It must also be remembered that white-fronted geese kept and bred in confinement often have pink feet (Azser pallites, Selys de
Longchamps).

2 I have already said above in describing the male that sometimes the white is quite absent from the chin.
3 ге, around the nares, on the culmen, and at the base of the branches of the lower mandible.

46 Geese of Europe and Asia

DIMENSIONS OF ADULT BIRDS

Total length . , 635—760 mm. (= 24.25-30 in.).
Wing . я : ; 375—435 mm. (= 14.75—17 in.).
Culmen ; 40—56 mm. (= 1.57—2.20 in.).!
Bill from gape : : | 40—56 mm. (= 1.57—2.20 in.).!
Height of upper panini ; 23.5 mm. (= 0,90~1.20 in.).
Breadth of upper mandible at base . ; 22—26 mm. (=0.85—1.05 in.).
Tarsus . и : ; ' é, 51-81 mm. (= 2.25—3.20 i)?

The number of teeth on each side of the upper mandible, so far as I have yet been
able to convince myself, is for the most part about 28, and in rare cases 26; but I have
not had sufficient material to finally clear up this point. | |

The weight of these geese fluctuates between 5 and 64 Ibs. More exact data have
been given by Mr. Popham in the /ze/d, 1903 (January 17, No. 2612), where this author,
from 21 specimens, found the maximum weight =6 lbs., minimum =4 lbs., and mean 55 lbs.
Seeing that, as we go east, white-fronted geese somewhat increase in dimensions, it is
desirable that sportsmen should furnish us with data of the weight of all specimens of this
species they may take. |

Having regard to the part played hitherto by bill-dimensions in various specimens
of the white-fronted goose in dividing it into a western and eastern form, I consider it worth
while to cite some of the measurements made by myself from skins obtained from various
localities in Russia. Unfortunately, in many cases the sex of the birds was not determined.

Culmen along straight line from forehead to end of nail of upper mandible :—

$ 48.5 mm. (= 1.90 in.) Livonia (Buturlin).
Young bird 46 , (=1.81 ,, ) Novaia Zemlia (Nosilov).

Sex Pees we ee К Пао Govetiment (500%

Young bird 43 Бы lesie):

Sex ne оо, ) ?-Voronezh, Goverament Е,
4 1A » (=1.92 ,, ) Orenburg region (Eversmann).
у PAs (= 1-00 5.) Kirsiz.cteppe (Karel),
uy Paige » (=2.04 „) Kamchatka (Voznesensky).

- ? AO » (=1.81 , ) Kamchatka (Voznesensky).

x 4 52 » (=2.04 , ) Kamchatka (Voznesensky). .

; ? 47 » (=1.85 ,, ) Japan (Nagasaki) (Polyakov).

+ 4 53 „ (=2.08 ,, ) Sakhalin (Suprunenko). |

: < 44 » (=1.73 , ) Sakhalin (Suprunenko).

. 252 4, (=2.04.,, ) Bering Island (Grebnicki)?

as ? 49 » (=1.92 „) Yezo (Maksimovich).

у 2 48 „ (=1.88 ,, ) Chukchiland (Baron Maidel).

Ре ? 49 ‚ (=1.02 ,, ) Chukchiland (Baron Maidel).

х оф „ (=2.04 „) Chukchiland (Baron Maidel).* |
a ? 46 » (=1.81 ,, ) Chukchiland (Baron Maidel).°
‘ 3 48 » (=1.88 „) Verkhne-Kolymsk (Father ee
? 56 » (=2.20 ,, ) Anadyr (Grinewecki).

: day: » (=1.85 „) Anadyr (Olsufiev). |

“ ? 48.5 „ (=1.90 ,, ) Yakut Territory (Maak’.

1 In American race, т.е. Anser albifrons gambeli, culmen sometimes reaches бо mm. (= 2.35 in.) in length.

2 Variability in length of tarsus in geese very great, and far from corresponding to о of bill, so that I accord only ое
importance to this measurement.

3 A young specimen, in which five external wing-feathers of left wing and two external wing- fatness of right are ee white—a very
rare feature, it would seem, of partial albinism among geese.

4 Labelled “ Amser intermedtus.”

5 Labelled “A. gambelz,’ and further, ‘bill dark colour, on upper surface and near edges ‘slightly orange. 2 ae bird came
into hands of label-writer some:time after death. 2

White-fronted Goose 47

The following measurements were made at my request by Dr. Sushkin from
specimens obtained from the Turgai district and the Ryazan Government :—

Ф ad. 42 mm. (= 1.65 in.) Turgai District (Sushkin)

Dax Sita Glee © ya: ' ; We ieee aa (ees OKC aoa) > 5

Ф senior . : ' BE oN ML Е .

3 ad. ; Ais а о 9

< ad. ; iy a ee (Ces dopey ’ 3

$ ad. : AUS Mire elas Ayes 5 В
вс | Я ела м i

о 44 „ (=1.73 „) Ryazan Government ,,

Dr. Sushkin has also sent me bill-measurements of young birds from the Turgai
Territory, viz. :—

& juv AOr ti) Pe БЕ)
ie Bay ee Ale al Oa)
Gms, ATE (= 1.85 я
¢ +) 42 22 (= 1.65 a)
CRASS 38 » (= 1.49 we
Е“ Am see А.)

Summing up these measurements, we obtain the result that white-fronted geese from
Novaia Zemlia,* Livonia, the Kharkov, Ryazan, and Orenburg Governments, and the Kirgiz
steppe (including young birds), have the culmen measuring

43—49 mm. (= 1.69—1.92 in.)

From Verkhne-Kolymsk ; AZO) 3. C= Oh a1.00, 40)
» Kamchatka . : ; ; AA Коро
„ sakhalin, Yezo, and Japan . ; 44—53 4 (=1.75-2.08 ., )
„ Chukchi Peninsula and Anadyr . Е =? On, >)

Consequently, adult birds occurring in Russia have culmen-length 43 to 56 mm.
(=1.69-2.20 in.), the maximum length being 56 mm. (=2.20 in.) recorded only iu one
specimen which came from the most easterly portion of Asiatic Russia, thus being entirely
in accord with the general increase of bills in geese as we proceed eastwards. We see,
however, that the other Anadyr specimen and all those from Chukchiland collected by
Baron Maidel have considerably shorter bills, one of these, viz. 41 mm. (=1.86 in.), even
yielding to some European examples in size. We have no specimens of Greenland
white-fronted geese, but apparently they are rather less than the European form, and cannot
be referred to 4. gambelt.

In North America it is, however, well known that the white-fronted goose some-
times exceeds in the dimensions of the bill even the specimen we have cited above from
Anadyr, at times attaining the great length of бо mm. (=2.36 in.); but it must be
remembered that there also the length of bill of this goose varies from 40 to 60 mm. (= 1.57—
2.36 in.)—that is to say, there also often occur individuals not excelling European specimens.
Nevertheless, taken all together, it must be admitted that American white-fronted geese are
somewhat larger than ours; but in view of the fact that the colouring of the whole bird,
and, in particular, of the soft-parts, does not differ from that of ours, I do not know by what
characters to distinguish the American specimens which do not exceed the typical geese of

1 Unfortunately, of the white-fronted geese collected by him in Novaia Zemlia, Mr. Pearson only gives the total length of the birds,
but not the bills. They were 25-28 in. (=635—710 mm.) long, z.é, dimensions far from either of the limits.

4.8 Geese of Europe and Asia

this species in the dimensions of the bill. If even it be granted that the American form
(gambeli) must be distinguished from the East Asiatic white-fronted geese, yet the latter
at any rate are not distinguishable from the European birds. We shall try to prove this
again by entering more fully into the question of the colouring.of the bill of this goose.
Inaccurate description of the colouring of the bill of the European white-fronted goose has
been, perhaps, the main cause for separating from it the American and the East Asiatic
birds under the name of Auser gambel..

That the ovange or yellow colouring of the bill was attributed to the European white-
fronted goose from dry bills—or at any rate from birds that had been killed some time—
is beyond doubt. In living or recently killed birds the bill zs probably never either all
yellow or all orange, only separate portions of it being of that colour. The admission that
sometimes a white-fronted goose may be found with the bill of abnormal colour may be
made, and analogous cases are known among other aquatic birds (¢.g. grey-lag, mallard),
but such a feature would be a conspicuous exception, and it cannot therefore be taken into
account. The question of the normal colouring of the bill in the given case is so important
that I am compelled to touch upon it in greater detail in order to ascertain once for all
what this really is in both the European and the Eastern white-fronted goose described here,
and also in that of North America.’ I will begin with an author whose accuracy hardly
any one can doubt, but whose excellent works, for some reason or other, are now more
ignored than they should be. I mean Naumann, who describes the bill of this goose as
follows: “Colour of entire bill. Usually it is pale and pure yellow-red or orange-red without
black, and thts colour passes tn old birds through dull flesh-colour to a more or less rosy red,
often to a very beautiful rosy tint; but this colouring is to be seen only зи living specimens,
as after death tt vapidly turns into orange.”

Farther on, Naumann states that he saw near Potsdam in a living pair of these
geese “‘ 2/15 beautiful rosy colouring also on the feet.” |

The nail is described by the same writer as dingy white or white, passing toward
the tip into grey. |

“Tn mature young birds,” 3 continues Naumann, ‘the bill is reddish ochreous yellow.

“The dingy yellowish or brownish-white nail posteriorly and the sides of the lower
mandible have dingy brown markings.

“Within, the beak is somewhat paler than without; the tongue is of a yellowish reddish
white or flesh-colour. After death the colouring of the bill passes from orange to reddish,
then becomes darker, and finally, after drying, assumes a whitish horn-yellowish colour. The
nail remains white; the ceroma is reddish yellow or red-grey. The feathering of the outer
part of the eyelids is whitish.”

From this statement of Naumann’s it becomes evident that in the Ave 64746 seen
by him the bill was of a deautiful rosy colour, and that after death z¢ rapidly passed into
ovange. From the last phrase it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that if the bill of the
living bird were already orange, there was no reason for it to be subjected to any change or
transformation in order to again become orange.

1 | am fully conscious that my frequent repetitions and long dwelling on the structure and colouring of the bills of certain geese
must be very tiresome to the majority of my readers, but I am obliged to unravel very involved questions which for more than a century
have remained undecided, and I cannot do this otherwise than by a careful analysis aimed at substantiating the view expressed by myself
on certain species of geese, or my deductions might be regarded as baseless,

2 Italics mine,

3 Consequently in their first plumage.

White-fronted Goose 49

Now, in order to still more clearly explain what I mean, I must refer to a very
characteristic phrase used by Naumann, which I cite also in the description of the lesser
white-fronted goose, viz.: “ The bill after death and the dry bill change into a light horn-
yellow colour, by which wt 15 possible to judge approximately of its colouring during
уе.” From this, one may confidently say that Naumann, who had seen living and
freshly killed greater and lesser white-fronted geese, considered that we might approx-
mately gudge the colour of the bills of hiving birds from dry horn-yellow bills.

Since in the description of the lesser white-fronted goose I deny the existence
in that species of an entirely yellow or orange bill, so here also I do the same in regard
to the white-fronted goose, on the basis of an examination of Naumann’s description,
and further draw the conclusion that its true normal colouring is fale flesh,! vosy
veddish, or, finally, the beautiful rosy colour which Naumann saw in living specimens near
Potsdam.

Knowing how many ornithologists have blindly kept in their descriptions to those
of Naumann without entering deeper into his statement, and also knowing how later
ornithologists have borrowed, at second hand, such descriptions, without taking the trouble
to verify the words of the original author, it seems to me perfectly clear that it was from
Naumann, and no one else, that arose the description of the yellow or orange bill of the
white-fronted goose, although, as a matter of fact, as I have here tried to prove, this is
nowise apparent from Naumann’s own description.’?

From a very considerable number of skins examined by myself belonging to this
species and to the lesser white-fronted goose, I have been able to arrive at the conviction
that the dry bills are alémost always of a waxy yellow colour, and that it is hence evidently
impossible to judge of the colour of the bill in the living bird.

Let us now see how Messrs. Degland and Gerbe describe the bill of this goose: “ БД
ovange-yellow around nares, in middle of upper mandible and along edges of lower ; remain-
ing part of bill colour of wine-lees (йе de vin) with whitish nail.’ That this description
is perfectly accurate, at any rate for the great majority of white-fronted geese, is confirmed
by the following fact. In September тодот I had the pleasure of receiving from the author
of Dikie Gust Ross. Imp., Мг. 5. A. Buturlin, a packet with the head and foot of a white-
fronted male goose, killed in Livonia, September 18, with a letter as follows: “ Feet ovange-
yellow with pale claws, bill pale milky violet-colour with more whitish nail; basal portion
of rami of lower mandible, the extreme edges of the nares, and a narrow strip along the
median part of the culmen, orange.”

This head, preserved in formalin, clearly shows where and how the orange-colour is
disposed on the whitish (with rosy shade) ground-colour of the bill; and all this completely
coincides not only with the description of Messrs. Degland and Gerbe given above, but with
the description of the bill of user gambel by various authors. The following, for
instance, is what American ornithologists say about the latter: “ Bill milky white (becoming
flesh-colour some time after death), the interior part and tomia with a very faint rosy tinge,
the posterior part with a hardly perceptible wash of bluish; a square figure on culmen,
edges of nostrils, a small spot beneath them, and the basal two-thirds of the lower half of

1 Although the intensity of colouring varies considerably from the afflux or reflux of blood, the fundamental tint yet remains the
same, 2.е. rosy or flesh, between which it is not easy to draw the line.

2 Just the same thing happened, we saw, with the description of the Siberian grey-lag by Dr. Radde. Not understanding the
words of this author, many others transferred the bright rufous colour of the feathering surrounding the upper mandible simply to the latter,
thus producing the confusion of which Radde was quite innocent.

H

50 Geese of Europe and Asia

the under mandible cadmium-yellow; naked skin on mental angle and corner of mouth of
the same colour, but paler” (Stejneger).

According to the kind communication of Mr. Frohawk, the bills of the live geese
of this species (probably not quite adult birds) examined by him in the London Zoological
Gardens (January 30, 1902) were pale salmon-pink, nails whitish black and a streak passing
through nares, as also legs and feet apricot-yellow, claws white, ceroma greyish.

Finally, Dr. Sushkin answered my question as to the white-fronted geese from the
‘Turgai district as follows: “Jz adult bird, bill in both species (1.е. in greater and lesser
white-fronted goose) beautiful pure rosy ved colour, called in Linglish peach-blossom.
Intensity of this colour varies, and apparently ts connected with the аЙих and reflux of
blood (do not confuse this phenomenon with extravasation, which 15 only the consequence of a
wound in the bill or its neighbourhood) ; sometimes the bill may be very pale. In the lesser
white-fronted goose I have not seen orange colouring on bill, In A. albitrons a appears
on bridge of nose (between nares), at base, and laterally on vamt of lower mandible and
about nares. This colouring ts always very Ш defined. Perhaps traces of tt are constantly
present, but it becomes visible only in consequence of the reflux of blood, from which the rosy
ground colouring fades.”

These descriptions are in such agreement, that if we add to their evidence that of
Naumann’s drawing (де. Deutschl. pl. 289), representing the bill of 4. albifrons just as it
is described by Messrs. Degland and Gerbe, Buturlin, Frohawk, Sushkin, and Ridgway, no
doubt remains but that in both the European and the American white-fronted goose the
bill is xormally coloured the same, and an orange or yellow bill only occurs in dry skins ог
perhaps, as an exception, 7 very fat examples, when a layer of subcutaneous fat covers the
whole area of the bill. :

To finish with the colouring of the bill in the white-fronted goose, I may here quote
the following description from Professor Menzbier’s Prztsy Rosséz, vol. 1.: “In adult bird
bill ovange-yellow with whitish nail” (р. 738), and farther on (р. 739), ‘‘in regard to colouring
of bill, white-fronted goose comes nearest of all to grey-lag.” In the article on the latter
(/с. р. 755) we read that “15 bill is flesh-colour with white пай.” ‘This last indication,
which is perfectly true, does not agree in the least with the orange-yellow colouring given
by the author оп р. 738. At the end of the present book I quote, with the author's per-
mission, Mr. Buturlin’s account of his journey to Kolguev in 1902; at the very beginning
of which he speaks of fresh-killed white-fronted geese, and describes their bills exactly as
they appear in my own description. |

Although I have perhaps dwelt too long оп the question of the true colouring of the
bill of the white-fronted goose, I fear that I have yet not sufficiently clearly expressed my
meaning. This, then, is that neither orange nor yellow occurs normally as the entire
colouring of the bill in 4. a/difrons, and that there is 20 difference whatever between the
colouring of the bill in the latter and that of the American 4. gambelz. Accordingly a
somewhat greater size of beak is the sole distinguishing character of the American form,
and that only as a rule or in extreme cases, but nowise universally.

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

The present is not the first time that I have had occasion to unite certain forms of
geese regarded by the majority of ornithologists as distinct. I have indeed been compelled

White-fronted Goose 51

to do so with the European and the Asiatic representatives of the grey-lag, with the ordinary
lesser white-fronted goose, and finally with the European and the Asiatic white-fronted geese.

By this amalgamation, the question of the range of the present species is considerably
simplified, and may be expressed in general terms as follows: 4. albifrons nests in limited
numbers* in Finmark and, on the testimony of Gobel, in Lapland. The following is
what the latter well-known odlogist and ornithologist has written to me on this subject:
“Ног reasons which are not quite clear to me, an opinion exists that 4. albifrons is not
met with breeding in Lapland. I do not share this view, but hold that 4. albifrons,
regularly or sporadically (of this I cannot judge), nests in Lapland, at any rate near
Notozero. In 1897 Laps brought to the Kola forester Auwikaine, now deceased, two
young geese from that locality, not quite mature. I saw them at his place in the winter
of 1899 when they were almost three years old. The female proved to be a typical
Melanonyx arvensis, with short bill marked by a yellow ring; the male, on the other hand,
was 4. albifrons, with, however, a remarkably narrow streak of white on the forehead and
around the base of the bill. The birds were of similar size. In the spring of 1898 and
1899 these geese paired, but the female laid no eggs.”?

The species. also breeds in the Kola Peninsula, in the region of the Varanger pee
in large numbers in Novaia Zemlia,* in Kolguev, and in the Kaninsk Peninsula, in the
basin of the Obi, from its delta descending south to Berezov, in the Taimyr Peninsula, on
the Yenisei (where Mr. Popham found old birds, eggs, and young in down), and over the
whole of the extreme north of Siberia to Chukchiland inclusive. Whether the region of its
nidification is a continuous zone or with interruptions, the present extremely scanty data
do not admit of determining, and it is also impossible to determine even approximately the
southern frontier of the breeding-grounds of this species in Siberia. Like the lesser white-
fronted goose, this is pre-eminently a bird of the far northern tundra, and probably of the
majority of the islands lying along the whole shore of the Arctic Ocean of the East Asiatic
continent; Dr. Bunge having found it in 1866 on Lyakhov Island.

The statement of the Russian sportsman, the late L. P. Sabaneev, that the breeding-
grounds of the white-fronted goose descend, in the Perm Government, as far south as 57° N
lat., is refuted by Professor Menzbier.

It must, however, be remembered that Eastern Russia is still extremely ill explored,
and that what now seems to us so little credible in the distribution of various animal
forms there, may very easily prove perfectly true. It is a sad confession, but the distrust
of our knowledge of Russia's fauna becomes stronger the more closely it is studied.

The white-fronted goose also breeds in Greenland, Iceland, and throughout the
Arctic part of North America; in the latter as the longer-billed form now distinguished
under the name 4. albtfrons gambelz.

On migration the white-fronted goose is met with not only in all European and
Asiatic Russia, but throughout Western Europe, wintering locally in Great Britain, Belgium,
Holland, and in the whole Mediterranean basin. It also winters in vast numbers in Egypt,
where, as Captain Shelley states, it is the predominating goose,‘ as well as in the basins of

1 So far as known; but perhaps in considerable numbers.

2 Unfortunately, subsequently, in the absence of С. Е. СбЪе!, who did not succeed, as he had intended, in taking their dimensions,
they were eaten by their unscientific mistress.

3 By Pearson found both in Litidtkeland and in the southern part of the island.

4 Presumably this species was the domestic goose of ancient Egypt, as its portrait is found on the walls of ancient temples,
where it is represented as being fed by men.

52 Geese of Europe and Asia

the Black and Caspian Seas, in North India, China, Korea, and Japan. As to Trans-
caucasia, and even the lakes of the Armenian highland, I have a curious fact to com-
municate. I have myself seen white-fronted geese shot near Tiflis, but for some reason
local sportsmen, to my great surprise, there consider them as almost uneatable, while in
the Azov region this goose is highly esteemed as a table-bird—an opinion with which I am
quite in accord, as I have often had occasion to use them as food, and have also heard
the most favourable accounts of their excellence from all the inhabitants.

As regards the American representative of this goose, it is known that, while
migrating through the whole country, it travels to winter as far south as Mexico and
Cuba.

While, then, we know approximately both the summer and winter habitats of the
white-fronted goose, and have seen that it is met with on passage almost throughout
Western Europe and in European Russia, yet we are unable to give detailed data on its
lines of migration owing to the lack of observations. I consider indeed that, with the data
to hand, it would as yet be hazardous to define even approximately these lines, especially
in view of the fact of the frequent confusion of this species with the lesser white-fronted
goose, from which it is far from always possible to distinguish it with certainty when
on the wing. Many such determinations are made, so to say, by eye; but, for birds which
not all ornithologists could certainly distinguish even by their skins, such determinations
from a distance can have absolutely no real value, and may easily still further complicate
the question. As regards facts, it is undisputed that in many parts of Asia white-fronted
geese are very rarely seen on migration. In the Turgai district, for example, these
geese were obtained by Dr. Sushkin, between September 20 and October 4, on two
lines of migration: one of these being in the extreme northerly corner of the territory,
the other midway between the upper waters of the Tobol and the Emba. In Turkestan
it is rare, as it is in North Mongolia. In Central Asia Przewalski, for some reason,
nowhere mentions it; but in the Ussori district white-fronted geese are numerous when
migrating, as is stated by the same explorer in his description of their passage over Lake
Khanka.

According to the Abbé David, this goose passes in great numbers along the coast of
China, and, although in winter not plentiful in the markets of Peking, is very abundant at
that time of year in those of Shanghai. We do not, however, know much about its winter
quarters ; although, on the other hand, we are aware that in several localities where it might
be supposed to winter it is not met with. For instance, let us take the valley of the
Atrek, where Mr. Zhitnikov observed such a vast number of lesser white-fronted and
red-breasted geese (the latter on passage from Persia), although he did not see a single
specimen of the white-fronted goose, whereas not very far distant, on the Caspian Sea and
in Transcaucasia, these geese winter in large numbers. There seems, moreover, no doubt
that they pass the winter on all the shores of the Black Sea, г.е. in suitable spots of the
Western Caucasus and on the Asia Minor coast; but, unfortunately, these places remain to
this day no better explored than many far more distant localities in Russian territory. The
wintering of the species in the Crimea in large numbers is testified to by Dr. Radde (Sivash)
and other investigators. It arrives there at the end of September and remains till March,
but in hard winters only till December, as it retires from severe frosts, doubtless, to the warm
coasts of the Caucasus and Asia Minor. Countless hosts of these birds pass in autumn

White-fronted Goose 5 2

through the Azov district, along the lower course of the Don; and there is little doubt that
these flocks leave to winter on the Black Sea, while a part may even journey to North Africa,
although none make for the Caspian. In warm autumns these geese remain long about the
Azov, frequenting the estuaries of rivers and the rich green crops of the adjacent steppes.
Their loud, cheerful 24a-kha or gaga-gaga, really at a distance resembling laughter, is then
heard ceaselessly in those regions; but it must always remain a wonder whence such
innumerable flocks of geese can have come! True, my recollection of such hosts of white-
fronted geese refers to the past,—seventeen to twenty years ago,—but they undoubtedly
assemble there now in the autumn in large numbers. Notwithstanding such abundance, the
number killed is far from great. Only one autumn I remember, on the estuary of the Mius,
some twelve miles from Taganrog, that two brothers, professional wild-fowlers, whom I knew,
shot no less than some 400, owing to the fogs then prevailing, during which the geese flew
from their night refuge to feed in the steppe and back again, keeping very low. In the
Kharkov Government, on both passages, this species, according to Mr. М. М. Somovy, is the
most common of all geese.

That white-fronted geese do not always travel autumn and spring by the same routes
is certain. For example, in the Azov district, where such masses of them fly past in autumn,
their spring migration is comparatively so insignificant that the birds evidently return to
their northern home by other routes. In regard to this, I have already said that, in my
opinion, according to the data at hand, it is still premature to try to definitely ascertain their
routes, seeing the need for more numerous and exact observations. I am accordingly far
from sure that all the white-fronted geese wintering in Great Britain, Holland, and North
France arrive thither from Northern Russia and Finmark (although small numbers come
from the latter country), but admit that part arrives from Greenland and Iceland. As
to the natives of those countries, we cannot at present indicate their winter haunts; and
as to the passage of these geese along the Volga, Kama, etc., observations more accurate
than those which exist are still needed. This is the more necessary, seeing that the
lines of migration of geese are far from remaining unchanged from year to year. As is
truly observed by Professor Menzbier, ‘‘it must further be stated that white-fronted
geese do not travel year after year along the same branches of the main lines of migration.
Something causes them to leave their old favourite road for a new one, and then, together
with the alteration in direction of the migration route, the halting-places are also changed.
It is indeed possible that it is precisely the alteration in the conditions of the halting-
places and the facilities for getting food that compel the white-fronted geese to vary their
minor lines of migration.”

То confirm this by facts, it will suffice to quote a statement by Eversmann in his
Yestestvennaga [storia Orenburgskago Ктауа (part iii. р. 557, 1866): “ТЬе white-fronted
goose, he writes, “‘does not breed in our region (Orenburg Government): in spring, in the
month of April, it flies past in great flocks towards the East and North-East, while in autunm,
September and October, it flies back. The zone of passage of the white-fronted goose is very
wide, so that one boundary passes through the outskirts of Kazan and the other through
those of Orenburg and Iletsk. But the same flocks yearly pass over the same places, keep
always one course, and rest on familiar waters, so that at a short distance farther north or
south not a single goose is met with. It happens, however, sometimes that, from some
unknown cause, the birds abandon the known track and select a new one far northwards or
southwards, and then pass annually over the newly chosen route. Thus, for example, thirty

54 Geese of Europe and Asia

or more years ago, white-fronted geese year by year visited the village of Spasskoe (Orenburg
Government and district) where they rested; later on, they suddenly abandoned this route
and chose another, many miles to the north, and since then not a single white-fronted goose
has been seen in the neighbourhood of Spasskoe.” White-fronted geese during their
migration fly, like other geese, in a chain, key, or cone, while sometimes (as I have myself
observed, although but very seldom) from one side of the angle extends a chain again
forming an angle, and in such case these geese usually fly high. Quite otherwise do they
fly on short distances, on which occasions, when flying forth to feed in the steppes and
back again to water, they do so in a disorderly crowd, and more frequently in a bunch.
Flocks of white-fronted geese of several thousands, as observed by Mr. A. A. Brauner in
the lower reaches of the Dniester, I have never seen in the Azov region, although I often
observed 200 to 300 birds in a pack; but they still more frequently fly in autumn in gageles
of 70 to 150, and smaller parties of 40 to 50.

In the Don steppes I have flushed swarms of these geese amounting to tens of
thousands; but, having once risen, these hosts immediately broke up into comparatively
small flocks and flew off, one after the other, either to another part of the steppe or to water,
uttering all the time their loud, laughing cackle.

Usually the first flight to the steppe to feed took place at dawn,” before sunrise (this
was from September to the middle of November, but sometimes later); at 8 in the morning
they would return to the Mius estuary, whence at 11-12 they again flew to the steppe for an
hour or two, and about 2 to 3 in the afternoon returned to drink, and by 4 o'clock were
again on the pasture, where they remained till almost complete darkness. This was the
mode of life of the birds if unmolested; but the flocks when alarmed often changed such
disposition of their time, and the regularity of their visits to the fields was broken. Some
authors consider the white-fronted goose less wary than other geese, while others deny this.
Personally, I, after pursuing them with great perseverance, have become convinced that their
caution nowise falls short of that of other geese, the only difference being that it is usually
possible to approach them on foot or otherwise nearer than, for example, the grey-lag,
although they hardly ever allow one to come within gunshot.

Mr. Trevor-Battye relates that the gosling which he managed to catch on Kolguev
dived splendidly, but was at last seized by a dog, which had gone under water in pursuit.

This gosling* “had a way of standing straight up on end, but with his breast puffed
out,’ and was “not in the least bit shy of us. He inspected every corner of the tent,” and
during expeditions of his masters followed them, devouring the shoots of various plants,
among which he was especially fond of mare’s-tail (Едет).

The same author gives a very minute and interesting description of the taking of
moulting geese by the Samoyeds, who drive them into nets set at the water’s edge and ending
in a cul-de-sac. This goose-hunting is of great importance to the natives, who thus provide
themselves with food for the whole year; but the chief part of their take is composed not of
the species described here, but of Branta bernicla. At the end of his interesting book, the
author makes the following statement about the white-fronted goose, which he correctly calls
“kazarka” in Russian, but in Samoyed “seer griin”: “ Among the many white-fronted geese
brought in by the natives, I never saw a single individual which I could refer to the smaller

1 This refers to the Mius estuary, twelve versts from Taganrog and about forty from where the Mius falls into the sea. The М
with its shoals, on which the geese rested and often passed the night, is about two versts broad.
2 Unfortunately, the author does not give a description of this gosling, and I do not know of any.

W hite-fronted Goose _ 55

race, „{. ег йториз, L.. There was certainly some variation in size, but I have по doubt
that, like the specimens which I brought back, they all belonged to the larger form. The
white-fronted on Kolguev was far more wary than the bean-goose. A sitting bird would
not allow you to get within gunshot before she left her eggs. I may at once say that I
never myself identified this bird at the nest, though I have no doubt whatever in my own
mind that one of the nests we came across during our walk across the island belonged to
this species.” The four eggs, slightly smaller and rounder than those of the bean, and also
of a clearer creamy white, exactly agreed with some brought to me with the old birds by
Mekolka the Samoyed. I have reason to believe that, while the bean-goose is pretty
generally distributed over the whole island, the white-fronted affects rather the north-eastern
district.

“On Kolguev this species moulted rather later than the bean. Of those we took at
the goosing on July 18, none had lost their primaries, and I saw many on the wing. I
have described elsewhere in this book the habits of the young bird in the down, which we
kept for a few days alive. They did not bring their young down to the sea as early as the
bean, but kept them to the lakes.”

As regards Novaia Zemlia, Mr. Pearson gives us very little information. He
found the white-fronted goose both in Ltidtkeland and on the southern island. The
length of the specimens varied between 25 and 28 inches. They were in full moult about
Тау 25. |

Middendorff (whom, by the way, all authors quote when writing of this 9'005е)
observes that: “The vanguard of this species appeared оп Boganida (70° N. lat.) some
days earlier than 4. segetum,* viz. on April 27. On June 3 these geese reached the
river Taimyr.

“ Го this species belonged the majority of the geese breeding in the Taimyr district ;
and, according to the statement of my interpreter, at the mouths of the Pyasina and Bolo-
chnaya (Balochnaya?) this goose and the following are the almost sole nesters. On July
10, I found, in 74° N. lat., a nest with two eggs ina hollow made in the top of a high conical
grassy tussock. ‘The eggs were disposed on a thick layer of down. At the same time the
birds that were not breeding began to moult, and by July 15 we met with several flocks
which were no longer able to fly.

“Other birds were still dropping their feathers on July 27. On August 3 they were
already fledged, although on August 2 I found, on the rocky Taimyr Lake, a goose of this
species engaged in hatching her eggs.”

Farther on, Middendorff says that one specimen of the species Auser intermedius
at any rate with the bill-colouring of the latter, had a culmen length of 46 mm. aor ine,
and from gape 49 mm. (= 1.92 in.), with tarsus 68 mm. о

Passing now to the North American continent, we learn that Dall found {+8 breeding
in great numbers on the banks of the Yukon in Alaska. He describes the nest as a mere
hollow in the sand. Farther eastwards MacFarlane found, at the mouth of the Anderson, a
nest of this goose thickly lined with dry grass, feathers, and down. The number of eggs in

1 т.е. A. fnmarchicus, Gunner.

2 This could be determined only by killing the bird straight from the nest.

3 Either М. arvensis or M segetum serrirostris.

4 i.e. A. finmarchicus.

5 Evidently, this was a younger specimen with dark spots on the bill, which in fully mature birds is orange.
6 A. albifrons gambeli,

56 Geese of Europe and Asia

a clutch is usually stated as from 5 to 7, but there is no doubt that the number is
sometimes greater.

The table of dimensions and weights of eggs of the white-fronted goose given below
was compiled by Mr. Gobel on the basis of 24 specimens.

Max. breadth 56.5 mm. (= 2.22 in.), with length 88 mm. (= 3.48 in.) and weight 1248 cgrm. (Siberia).

Min. breadth 49.5 mm. (= 1.94 in.), with length 87.5 mm. (= 3.44 in.) and weight 1122 cgrm. (Boganida).

Max. length 88.5 mm. (= 3.48 in.), with breadth 56.5 mm. (= 2.22 in.) and weight 1248 cgrm. (Siberia).

Min. length 76 mm. (= 2.99 in.), with breadth 53.5 mm.(=2.10 in.) and weight 1062 cgrm. (Novaia Zemlia—
Chernaya Guba).

Max. weight 1248 cgrm., with breadth 56.5 mm. (= 2.22 in.) and length 88.5 mm. (= 3.48 in.).

Min. weight 996 cerm., with breadth 54 mm. (= 2.12 in.) and length 78.5 mm. (= 3.09 in.).

or

24 eggs gave: mean breadth 53.9 mm. (= 2.12 in.), max. breadth 56.5 mm. (= 2.22 in.), and min. breadth 49.5 mm.

C1074) 105)
24 eggs gave: mean length 81 mm. (= 3.19 in.), max. length 88.5 mm. (= 3.48 in.), and min. length 76 mm.
(=2.90 in)

20 eggs gave: mean weight 1098 cgrm., max. weight 1248 cgrm., min. weight 996 cgrm.

Of the breeding of this species in captivity there is no lack of information, and
probably it might locally, especially in the north, become a perfectly domestic bird, if any
one would undertake the task of breeding.

These geese lay pretty frequently in confinement, and become so accustomed to the
locality, if the latter is perfectly suitable for them, as not to evince any desire to leave during
the autumn and spring migrations, even with the wings unclipt.!

Cases are known of crosses between the white-front and the bean (which 2), as also
between the former and the grey-lag, in confinement.

The reader will find an account of one case of such supposed hybrid at the end of the
present section.

In the Zoologist for 1902 (pp. 337-351), Mr. Coburn states that among white-fronted .

geese killed in Great Britain besides ие’ albifrons, Anser gambeli is undoubtedly met
with ; and, describing in detail the various plumages of both forms from English specimens,
and emphasising the importance of the larger bill of Anser gambelt, this author maintains
the specific distinctness of the latter.

Although minutely discussing the plumage, and scrupulously indicating the dimensions
of the specimens, it seems to me that Mr. Coburn measured the length of the bill not along
the straight line from the feathering of the forehead to the end of the nail on the upper
mandible, but along the curve, which always gives somewhat greater dimensions.

A careful study of the article in question has, however, failed to convince me that the
geese taken by the author for gaméel really belonged to that American variety of the white-
fronted goose. I am not ш a position to categorically state that Mr. Coburn is mistaken in
his identification, as I have not seen his specimens, but the following considerations compel
me, on the basis of the author’s own data, to doubt the truth of his deductions.

First of all, Mr. Coburn says that these geese have much more black on the belly
than 4. aloifrons; but I think that Russian and Siberian examples of albéfrons may be seen
with just as black an abdomen. It must be remembered also that in this respect the whole
of this group of geese is subject to very considerable variation. We saw this in connection

1 The 12244 for 1902 (Nos. 2584, 2585) contained two notes оп the breeding of these geese on private waters in Great Britain ;
one being by Mr. Frohawk.

White-fronted Goose 57

with user anser, and shall again do so in the lesser white-front, 4user finmarchicus.
In the grey-lag, the belly, so far as I know, is never wholly black, but in the lesser
white-fronted goose this is a very common occurrence. In the same degree as in the latter,
this colouring varies also in the white-fronted species, while, so far as the evidence of the
material I have examined goes, the greater or smaller amount of black on the belly is not
dependent on the size of the bill, nor on that of the bird. Accordingly, I cannot regard
this character as sufficient evidence for assigning the British large-billed .4. albz/rous to the
American race, 4. albtfrons gambelt.

As regards length of bill, the dimensions given by Mr. Coburn, although very large,
yet, with the exception of one case, viz. a bill 2 inches (=51 mm.) long, do not exceed the
size of the bills of Russian birds. In regard, however, to the colouring of the bill, the bright
orange-red colour given by Mr. Coburn does not at all agree with the descriptions known
to me of the bill of Axser albtfrons gambelt, in which, as American authors describe it, the
bill is milk-white, while the terminal part and the edges of the upper mandible are tinged with
pale pink, and the basal portion shows a slight bluish shade; the long patch on the culmen,
the edges of the nares, a small spot under the nares, and the basal two-thirds of lower part
of lower mandible being orange-yellow. That is, the Americans describe the bill of Ч ие’
aloifrons gambelt exactly as it is in the Russian and Siberian 4. aldzfrons. Of the
latter I have given a sufficiently detailed statement of all I know in its proper place. In
regard to the bright orange-red colouring which, in Mr. Coburn’s opinion, appears in birds
as the breeding period approaches, I think that when such birds are met with, it may be
at once assumed that they are particularly well-fed specimens, since I have no doubt that
this orange colour is the result of the deposit of subcutaneous fat. I cannot but add the
following remarks in conclusion. Mr. Coburn refers to an article in the /dzs for 1902 (р. 269)
by Mr. Gurney, to whom he sent for examination a specimen of lesser white-fronted sucess
shot in Norfolk in January 1902.

Now Mr. Gurney discussed the subject in question in the above-mentioned article,
where he gives drawings of the bill and part of the head of this supposed lesser white-fronted
species, and below a drawing of the bill and head of a specimen shot in Egypt.

The most superficial inspection of Mr. Gurney’s plate is quite enough to convince an
expert that the upper figure has nothing in common with the lower one, and the dimensions
of the bill, 1.50 inches (= 38.10 mm.), exceed those of the largest Russian and Asiatic birds
of this species yet known to me. Besides this, the curvature of the edges of the bill in the
upper figure clearly testifies (if the drawing be correct) that we here have to do with no true
lesser white-fronted goose. I am very sorry that time did not allow me to ask the above-
named gentlemen to let me see their specimens, but I hope my present note will help to clear
up this interesting question and will show that all English white-fronted geese belong to
the ordinary species.

CROSS BETWEEN WHITE-FRONTED GOOSE AND ONE OF THE SPECIES OF THE GENUS
MELANONVX

Before me lies the skin of a remarkable goose, obtained by Dr. Sushkin, which I
cannot regard as anything else than a hybrid between the white-fronted species with one of
the bean-geese, and most probably with the true bean-goose (AZelanonyx segetum).

As certified by Mr. F. К. Lorenz, this was a young female; as is indeed evident from

the feathers of the back and scapulz being narrower than in adults.
I

58 Geese of Europe and Asia

The structure of the bill brings this ene nearest to the whe: fronted goose.

Wing ; ; : ; 500: mm, (=. 20 in.)
Calman = 45 mm. (=01.77 in.)
Greatest depth Е г. Е visible on without ah shut bill, ` 54 mm. (=00.21 in.)

_ Nail of upper mandible contained 34 times in culmen; it is dark,
with a horn-white and very sharp point.

Base of bill dark, probably black during life. | |

Number of teeth along sides of upper mandible not more than 22 or 23 (I did not open
the bill, in order to prevent spoiling this interesting specimen). Nail of lower mandible,
apparently, not black but light horn-colour. The light band and light colour passing from
this under the nares and along the edges of the upper mandible were, I was informed,
ochre-yellow; but whether this was seen in the bird when just killed or some time after,
I do not know.

Accordingly, the bill, of the type characteristic of the white-fronted goose, with the
exception of the less number of teeth and the comparatively larger nail on the upper man-
dible, in colouring and pattern recalls the bean-goose. Head and neck entirely light brownish,
with mousy shade; near the upper mandible no traces of either white or black feathering
(latter peculiar to young 4. albifrons). Feathers of back and scapule dark brown with
lighter greyish brown tips. Breast light brownish grey, gradually becoming greyish white
on belly, which in its turn passes into the pure white of vent and lower tail-coverts. Flanks
light greyish brown with inconspicuous light tips, so that there is none of the barred effect
usually seen in adult geese of these races. Secondaries by their dark colouring sharply
contrasting with their greyish brown coverts, exactly as in typical 4. т Rest of
plumage agreeing with that of young white-fronted geese. |

_ This female specimen must be considered as in her first year. It was obtained at
the end of October 1902, in Gryazovets, Vologda Government.
I can only regret that this specimen was not an adult bird, in which case its
characteristic points would doubtless have been more marked.

THE LESSER WHITE-FRONTED GOOSE
ANSER FINMARCHICUS, GUNNER
Plates 5 and 6

English—7he Small White-fronted Goose; Lesser White-fronted Goose.

Russian—Malaya kazdrka; kozdrka (teste Sabaneev, in Transural); malaya belolobaya
kazarka and kozarka, kazarad and kozard (collective); maty beloloby gus, garkavy
gus (Little Russian, ¢este Pallas=snuffler); Azskun (Kamchatka) ; piskulka (Perm,
teste Sabaneev ; and elsewhere) ; дату (Cossacks in Kirgiz Steppe, acc. Maleev’) ;
Chugatka (Siberia) Vzzgun (Dall gives this name, without stating to which species
_ 16 belongs; seemingly to this, but in what district).

Bashkir—? Kara-kdz (=black goose; which seems to be doubtful).

Ostyak—Kirri-sém (on Surgut and Irtysh, ¢es¢e Pallas = sturgeon-eye).

Vogal—Lyak (Pallas). |

Samoyed—Szugere (Pallas).

Mongol—A chin (Pallas).

Kalmyk—Shoshinar-galim (Pallas).

Tungus—//yagl/ (Pallas).

VYakut—Khan-khalds ; Lyuglynyd, also Lygiyya.

Lamut—Karkali (Pallas).

Kamchadal—Keiresh ; Kéresid (Pallas).

Finnish—KXK¢tlgo-hanhi,; Kilju-hanhi.’ |

Lapp—Rzodt-chuonya (Muonjoniska); chudnya (Karesuando); Ukka-chuonyagaz and

| Relpinyun chuonya (Utsioki); galben-yudne chudénya (Finmarken). These names

I borrow from F. D. Pleske.

German — Kleine Bldssengans,; kleine Blissgans; Ищете Blissgans, kleinschnabelige
Gans ; Schwalbengans , Zwerggans.

Swedish—/zumarke Gaas (Gunner, 1767).

French—Ove naine.

Anas erythropus, Linn., Syst. Nat. i. р. 197 (partim, cum A. He oes as 1776.
Anser finmarchicus, Gunner, in печ Leems, Bestrivelse over Finmarkens Гаррет, J. Е. ВОВЕ Anmaerkinger,

о 2 Ruzheinaya Okhota, 1900, book ix., July.

2 Notwithstanding Pallas’s statement that he knows only one species of white-fronted goose (A. erythropus), it must be presumed
that he met with both species, and that, like Linne, he confused them ; therefore very probably the above-quoted native names refer partly
to the white-fronted goose, A. albifrons, partly to the lesser species. Unfortunately, it is now impossible to decide this question—the
natives must be questioned afresh. The dimensions of the wing given by Pallas do not enable me to decide what goose he means, as a
wing of 15 in. (=380 mm.) may occur among large lesser white-fronted geese as well as among the smallest specimens of the larger

species.

59

бо Geese of Europe and Asia

р. 264 (1767) =Canuti Leemii, De Lappon. Finmarchiae, cum J. Е. Gunneri notzs, No. 115, р. 264;
Reichenow, J. Е. Ornit, 1890, р. 81.

Anser albifrons (partim), Gmelin, Syst. Nat., 1. р. 509 (1788); Bonnaterre, Encyclop, Méthod., 1. р. 114 (1790);

; Radde, Bull. Soc. Mosc., 1854, iii. p. 160 (artzm) ; Eversm., Yest, I. Or. Kr,, Ш. р. 556 (partim) (1868),

Anser temminckit, Boie, Isis, 1822, р. 882; Middendorff, Reis. Sib., и, р. 228, pl. xx. (pull.) 1851; Radde, Reis,
5.-О. Sib., И. р. 358 (1863).

Anser brevirostris, Brehm, Isis, 1830, р. 996 (1830); za, Nat. Vog. Deutschl., р. 844 (1831); Fritsch, Vog.
Eur,, р. доб, pl. 45, fig. 3 (juv.), fig. 7 (adult), 1370.

Anser cineraceus, Brehm, Lehrb. Nat. Eur. Убе. И. р. 722 (1824).

Anser minutus, Naum., Убе. Deutschl., xi. р. 364, pl. 290 (1842) ; Nordmann,, J. #. Orn., 1864, р. 376 (Fennia) ;
Finsch, Ibis, 1877, р. 62; Seebohm, Birds Jap. Emp, p. 238 (1890); Bree, Birds Eur. iv, р. 137
(1867); Kessler, Russk. Ornit. р. 369 (1846); Radde, Ornis Сацс., р. 443 (fartim), 1884; Buturlin,
“ Psov. i Ruzh. ОКВ.” 1901 (Dikie Gusi В. T.); М. separ., passim (1901); Przewalski, Put. Uss. Кг.
1870, passim; Bogdanov, Pt. i Zv.-Povolzhya, p. 148 (1871); Palmeén, Cab. J. f. Orn. xxiv. р. 53
(1876); Deryugin, Trud. J. $. Pb. Obshch. Yest., xxix. р. 2 (1898); Sushkin, MS, letters to author ;
Zhitnikov, “ Psov. i Ruzh. Okhota,” 1902, р. 134.

Marilochen brevirostris, “ Heckel,” Reichenbach, Av. Syst. Nat., р. ix. (1852).

Anser evythropus, Pallas ( partim, cum albifr. mixta) Zoogr. Ross.-As., И. р. 225 (1811); Newton, Proc. Zool, ос.
Lond. (1866), р. 341 ; 2d, “ Ibis,” 1860, р. 406; Degl. and Gerbe, Orn. Eur., ii. р. 486 (1867); Hume and
Marshall, Game Birds of India, iii. р. 78 (with pl., 1880) ; Dresser, Birds of Eur., vi. р. 383 (1879); Salvadori,
Cat. Birds Brit. Mus., xxvii. p. 97 (1895); Menzbier, Ptitsy Rossii, 1. р. 740 (1895); 24., Okhotn. i Prom.
Pt. Ross. i Kavk., ii. р. 468, pl. 133 (sud A. albifrons), 1902; Trevor-Battye, Icebound on Kolguev,
р. 423 (1895); Zhitnikov, Nabliud. na reke Atreke, “ Рзоу. i Ruzh. Okhota,” 1900; 2d, sep. imp,,
passim (1900); Silantiev, Opred. Yevr. Pt, 1901, р. 112; Kholodkov. i Silantiev, Pt. Yevr., р. 523;
Alpheraky, “Zhurn Okhoty,” 1877, р. 80; Khomyakov, Pt. Ryaz. Gub. 1900, р. 34 (A. albifrontis
var.); Finn, How to know Indian Ducks, p. 19, 1901; Blanford, Fauna Brit. Ind., iv. p. 418 (1898) ;
Oates, Man. Game Birds India, 1899, p. 53 ; Taczanowski, Faune Orn. Sib. Or., р. 1093 (1893); Chapman,
Wild Norway, р. 298 (1897); Karamzin, A., Pt. Samarsk. i Ufim. gub., p..183 (1901); Ruzski, М., Sist.
Sp. Pt. Kaz. gub. (Trudy Yest. Pr. Kaz. Univ., tom. xxv. pt. 6, р. 115) (1893); Macpherson, History of
Fowling, 1897, p. 222.

Anser albifrons minutus, Seebohm, Hist. Brit. Birds, iii. р. 505, pl. 62 (ovum), 1885.

Anser albifrons, var. erythropus, Buturlin, Tabl. Opred. Plastinchatokl. (“ Psov. i Ruzh. Okh.,” 1900, р. 9).

Anser erythropus minutus, Palmén, Bidr. Sibirsk, Ishafsk. Fogelf. Vega-Exp., vii.

Anser rhodrhynchus, Buturlin, “ Psov. i Ruzh. Okh.,” 1901 (Dikie Gusi Ros. I., Febr.-Apr.) ; z@., sep. impr., р. 19;
24, Sinopt. tabl. Okhotn. Pt. Ross. I., 1901, р. 46; Zhitnikov, “Psovaya i Ruzh. Okh.,” March 1902,
р. 134 seg.; Buturlin, “ Psov. i Ruzh. Okh.,” 1902, June, р. 120 (“ Yeshche о belolobykh gusyakh ”).

ADULT MALE

Colouring of head and upper half of neck brown, for the most part with a coffee or
cinnamon (ruddy) shade of greater or less intensity, or chestnut-brown, considerably darker
than in white-fronted goose. On forehead a large white blaze, extending from very base of
bill backwards, more or less in a wedge-shape, between eyes considerably beyond line joining
their anterior angles. From this blaze white descends, narrowing considerably, along
sides of base of upper mandible to gape; here it is interrupted and is again renewed opposite
base of lower mandible, and sometimes is here in contact with white terminal part of feather-
ing of chin, while sometimes this spot is isolated, this being independent of sex or age,
and simply an individual peculiarity. White of forehead and feathering along sides of
base of bill bordered posteriorly by a very dark, blackish band, passing gradually into brown
colouring of rest of head and neck. Lower half of neck, breast, and flanks lighter rufous
brown with light greyish edgings to feathers; belly still lighter, mingled with pure white
and with large black, transverse, irregularly shaped patches, which apparently with age
become more and more extensive, and in very old individuals often so far coalesce that the
whole of the belly is almost entirely black.

Variability in size and number of black patches so great that it is difficult to find
two specimens alike in this respect.

Lesser White-fronted Goose 61

Vent and under tail-coverts pure white. Back and shoulders brown, varying in depth
in different individuals, with white edgings to feathers, and sometimes extremely similar to
feathering of same parts in Branta bernicla ; rump blackish, upper tail-coverts pure white.
Tail consists of sixteen greyish black feathers with narrow white edgings and broad
white tips.

Upper lesser wing-coverts ce blue, median similarly coloured basally, but with
brownish tint on outer half of feathers ; greater secondary coverts brown with narrow white
tips; primary coverts light cinereous grey.

Outer primaries grey with blackish tips; inner primaries and outer secondaries entirely
brown-black, so that with folded wing a fairly conspicuous brown-black speculum is obtained.

Inner secondaries and tertiaries same colour as scapulars. Shafts of all feathers
white, with exception of the black tips.

Under part of wing very dark grey, and axillaries still darker—blackish.

Bill very different from that of white-fronted goose, much shorter, and more conical
in shape, z.e. compared with tip, much thicker at its base; tomia of upper mandible not
curved at all, and in living and freshly killed
specimens completely covering teeth of upper man-
dible, of which there are altogether 22 on each
side instead of 28, as usual in the white-fronted
goose."

It must, however, be borne in mind that,
although in the majority even of dry skins in the
lesser white-fronted goose the teeth of the upper
mandible are not visible when the bill is shut,
sometimes when, in drying, the skin of the edges
of the upper mandible gets warped or slightly raised,
its teeth are disclosed. In the relation between
the length of the nail of the upper mandible to the
total length of its culmen, there is also a consider-
able difference, as shown in the annexed drawings.

As regards the colouring of the bill, I am compelled to go into somewhat greater
detail below; while its dimensions are given in the general table of measurements of this
species.

The feet of this small species of goose are apparently, in the vast majority of cases,
orange-yellow, with paler (yellow) webs; the ceroma is lemon-yellow or also orange-yellow.
Iris dark chestnut. As Dr. Sushkin informs me, the eyelids (orange-yellow or lemon-
yellow) are very perceptibly swollen, so that a marked ring is produced around the eye, such

as is never the case in 4. albifrons. In consequence of this, the Ostyaks call this goose
kirrvi-sém (sturgeon-eye), as stated by Pallas.

Anser finmarchicus, 3 Anser albifrons, &
Culmen 35 mm. Culmen 53 mm.

ADULT FEMALE

Resembles male, and, as in all geese, is somewhat less in size; although some

females are large, not yielding in this respect to the smaller ganders, their bills are shorter
than in males of same size.

1 It is very possible that, with fuller material, some specimens will be found to have one or two teeth more or less, but it may be
presumed that the number in the lesser white-fronted goose never reaches that in 4. aldifrons.

62 Geese of Europe and Asia

The dimensions given here refer to adult birds of both sexes, since, ‚ notwithstanding
the very considerable material at my disposal, this was far from adequate to determine the
limiting dimensions for each sex separately.

Total length . 505—622 mm. (= 20—24.4 in.)

Spread. sg re eee 1280—1300 mm. (= 50—51 in.)
Sie te a Pe | | здЕ-Зо в mim. (= 12.50515,56 №.)

Culmen . Ac 29—37.5. mm. (= 1.10—1.47 in.)

Рави =: ; 51-66 mm. ( =.2—2.57. in.)

Middle toe ое ay , 49—56 mm. (= 1.11—2.25 in.)

Saher о а on a side of upper mandible, 22, OF perhaps 23. Weight from
4 to 6 Russian pounds.

The folded wings very о 0s overlap the tips ay the an feathers, а in
the white-fronted goose the wings rarely do so, and then not more than 20-25 mm.
(=0.78—0.98 in.). |

_ Мо.—Етот among the separate individuals quote the measurements of а large male from the Turgai Territory and a large female from
the Ryazan Government, communicated by Dr. Sushkin.

Adult $—Length . Sm PO Е 622 mm. (= 24.4 in.)
Spread . | : а
Wing . Не ти РА
Tarsus . ' ; Об 12.50 Ins)
Culmen ; ЕЕ В Е Е па

Adult ?—Length. : Ned СЕ: 609 „ (= 23.9'in.)
Wing . i : 223 BSS. а SOE EGA in, а
Tarsus . eee зе 60.» {= 2.36-m.)
Culmen ; ; ; : : ROL gnarl

То. НИ.

Уоомс Brrps IN First PLUMAGE

Differ from adults by total absence of white on forehead and along sides of base
of upper mandible, as also оп chin. White around bill replaced by black—usually rather
narrow, band, 2-4 mm. Only after first moult stray white feathers appear on ma black
band.

Lower part of body light smoky brown, the feathers being edged with dingy yellow.
Of black transverse patches on lower surface nota trace. Under tail-coverts, vent, and crissum
(posterior part of belly) white. Bill pinkish grey dingy in colouring. Legs pale dingy yellow,
sometimes with more or less strong touch of orange.

I may remark that Dr. Sushkin informed me that he had seen in young birds, in
their first autumn, white feathers growing on the forehead, but that it was not known how
far this feature is normal, and that he had not noticed it in 4. albifrons. Butas there is
no doubt the lesser white-fronted goose in its first autumn begins to change its first plumage,
the appearance of white feathers on the forehead receives a very simple explanation. Dr.
Sushkin goes on to say: ‘Already in the first plumage, in the autumn, the edge of the
eyelids in 4. minutus is noticeably swollen (in male more markedly) and of a lemon-colour.
Later orange-yellow and still more swollen.”

1 | may observe that neither the bill-measurements of Taczanowski in his Fazne ornithologique de la Sibérie orientale, nor. those
of С. Т. Radde in his О’ Caucasica, could be here taken account of, as they seem to me excessive for the lesser white-fronted goose,
and I have no doubt that, both authors in this case took small specimens of J. albifrons for the lesser white-front, although it is Е“ that
Taczanowski, in giving culmen 40 mm., simply made a hurried and approximate measurement.

Lesser White-fronted Goose 62

YOUNG BIRDS AFTER SECOND Мост .

Already white on head, but with black speckles (black feathers) and white spot at
mental angle very small. Scanty small black patches already appear on belly, increasing
in size and number with each successive year.!

YOUNG IN Down

Judging from illustration given by Middendorf, under the name of 4. temminckit
(S7b. Reis., И. pl. хх. fig. 2), above dark grey-brown, under surface and forehead to posterior
angle of eyes. greenish yellow with. dark longitudinal streak across eyes. In freshly killed
specimen the bill was dark greyish brown with reddish yellow point. Legs yellow-grey
shot with Mae

Seeing that by many authors the bill of this species is described as orange, Mr.
Buturlin decided to separate the geese of more easterly origin without orange bill as a
separate species, which he described under the name of Anser rhodorhynchus.

| If, merely on statements in literature, the esteemed author of Dikie Gust Rossiiskot
Imperit had grounds or the right to proceed thus, I, on the other hand, after examining
his question critically, come to the same result as in the cases of the grey-lag and white-
fronted goose, namely, that the majority of authors’ descriptions of the bill of this goose as
orange are inaccurate, and I am therefore compelled to add the species established by
Buturlin to the number of synonyms for 4. fimmarchicus. 1 had already written this,
when there appeared in Psov. ¢ Ruzh. Okhota for 1902 (March number, р. 134 ef seg.)
Mr. Zhitnikov’s criticism of the species 4. rhodorhynchus described by Buturlin, which
completely coincides with my view.

I am here compelled to make а rather long and tiresome digression, which will, how-
ever, supply some information supplementing the above-cited descriptions of this species.

Although it is the custom to consider that there is no difference in plumage between
the lesser and ordinary white-fronted goose, this is perfectly untrue. The arrangement
of the colouring is indeed the same, but the head and upper half of the neck in the lesser
white-fronted goose are considerably darker than in all white-fronted geese whose skins I
have examined while writing the present book. Further, the back is also darker and
strikingly recalls in its colouring that of the brent-goose (Branta bernicla). But the chief
distinction in plumage between the two species consists in the breadth of the white patch
on the forehead, which in the white-fronted goose only in rare cases reaches backwards to
the line joining the anterior angles of the eyes (it is mostly far from reaching this line),
but which always. considerably passes this line in the lesser white-fronted goose. The
breadth of this patch in the adult lesser white-fronted goose is always more than an
inch (not less than 33 mm. = 1.25 in.), while in the white-fronted goose it is usually con-
о vies an inch, and only in rare cases is a full inch in breadth, 25.4 mm.

1 It is very. probable of. the lesser white-fronted goose. -“Maleev writes, in his article (Psov. 7 Ruzh. Okh., 1900, pt. ix. July, р. 52),
that in the Kirgiz Steppe ‘‘the Cossacks determine the years of the kazarka by the dark bars across the biel belly. In young birds,
the lower part is whitish, there later appearing one, two, and more Багз; as many as seven having been met with, while in some the whole
of the under-side is black.” The Cossacks call them “‘tatars.” |

64. Geese of Europe and Asia

(=1in.); but more often the breadth of the blaze in this species only attains 19-20 mm.
(=0.74-0.78 in.). Consequently, the absolute breadth of this white patch in the adult lesser
white-fronted goose affords always considerably greater, and is a conspicuous and striking
character for the purpose of distinguishing these two species. With Mr. Oates’s opinion,
that the black band bordering the white patch behind is of constant breadth, I cannot agree,
as it is in fact variable in breadth and even in colouring, being sometimes almost black,
and at other times hardly darker than the ground-colour of the head. Moreover, owing to
the general darker colouring of the head in the lesser goose, this black band is less striking
than on the lighter ground of the head of the white-fronted goose.

In the lesser white-footed goose the yellow colouring and slightly swollen state of the
ceroma are extremely characteristic. These swollen eyelids, appearing so early (in the first
plumage), are of a lemon-yellow colour, forming a complete ring around the eye, which, as
we have already seen, is never the case with the white-fronted goose.

Lemon-yellow is the colour given to this ring by Mr. Finn in the case of three living
birds! observed by him in captivity in India. Dr. Sushkin, we have seen, says the same,
adding that in more mature birds this ring becomes orange-yellow. But most important
of all is the question of the colouring of the bill of this small goose, which has led
to such grave misunderstandings among various authors. Some of them, and among the
number Count Salvadori, call the colouring of the bill of this species orange-yellow, this
determination being based on dry skins and stuffed birds. Moreover, the fact is apparent that
in the majority of cases these authors copied the description from each other. ‘The error is
perfectly intelligible, if we take into consideration the fact that in the whole of Western
Europe this goose is comparatively rare, and that only very few who have written about
it had living or freshly killed specimens in their hands. There are also authors who call
the -bill reddish grey (young birds) ог dark flesh-colour (old birds), and that in birds
undoubtedly obtained in Western Europe.

Apparently, those authors, who had not the opportunity of seeing В killed lesser
white-fronted geese, borrowed the description of the colouring of the bill mainly from
Naumann.? But the latter says: ‘‘ The colour of the bill of young birds till the first autumn
moult is reddish grey, the nail blackish, the latter becoming later greyish white, and the
bill pale orange-yellow ; in old birds, it is bright reddish yellow or orange, the nail yellow
reddish white. Within, the bill is very pale reddish yellow, the tongue dark flesh-colour.
As after death, so also the dry bill turns a light horn-yellow colour, from which vo
approximately be guessed the colour it had in life.”

The colouring of the bill given by Naumann for young birds (2.е. in first Е 15
true alike for the specimens from Europe (European Russia) and for the oriental repre-
sentatives of this species. In regard, however, to old birds, great doubt exists in my mind
as to his expression bright reddish yellow or orange. To admit inaccuracy in Naumann’s
description is difficult, but his further expression: after death the bill turns a light horn-
yellow colour, from which may approximately be guessed the colour it had in life—makes
one involuntarily think that, perhaps, Naumann trusted to such a possibility and called the
bill orange by judging dry skins.

We have already seen that the same statement made by Ren after thoroughly
overhauling the question, in regard to the colouring of the bill of the white-fronted goose,

1 Finn, How to Know the Indian Ducks.
* Vogel Deutschi., xi. р. 868.

Lesser White-fronted Goose 65

proved to be inaccurate, and for the same reason, namely, that Naumann undoubtedly tried
to guess the colour of the bill of У. alézfrons from dry skins, while the live birds seen
by him in Potsdam had bills of a beautiful rosy colour. The reader will have seen that I
had to dispute the existence of normally orange bills in the case of the grey-lag (user
anser), and, as it seems to me, not unsuccessfully. The same has happened here, and I am
obliged to absolutely deny the existence of orange colouring of the bill in the living
European lesser white-fronted goose.

Unfortunately I have to regret that when I lived in Taganrog, where the lesser
white-fronted goose passes in autumn in vast numbers, I did not note exactly the colouring
of the bills of the individuals which came into my hands, some of which I shot myself, and
some of which were bought; but I am convinced that if they really had orange bills, such
a circumstance would hardly have escaped my attention.

So far as I remember, the colouring of the bill of freshly killed white-fronted geese of
the greater and lesser species, which more than once I examined together, in general showed
no marked differences, which would have been striking were the bill of the smaller species
orange. The few specimens of lesser white-fronted geese which I have had the opportunity
of seeing the day after being killed, either from Finland or the Novgorod Government, had
bills absolutely dark flesh-coloured. I particularly well remember two examples, one from
Finland (Vyborg Government), an old gander, with confluent black patches on belly, which
had a bright rosy flesh-coloured bill, and the other, a male from the neighbourhood of
Novgorod, with a rosy white bill, whose skin served as the original for Mr. Frohawk’s
drawing in Plate 5 of this work.

According to Dr. Sushkin, “the bill in the lesser white-fronted goose, as in the
kazarka, is of a beautiful and pure rose-red colour (peach-blossom). ‘The depth of this
colour varies, and is, it seems, connected with the afflux or reflux of blood (do not confuse
this phenomenon with extravasation, which occurs only in consequence of a wound in the
bill or its neighbourhood). Sometimes the bill is very pale. In 4. minutus I have not
seen an orange tinge on the bill.”* This statement is thus to the effect that in European
birds of this species the bill is (if only occasionally, as is the case with the grey-lag) yellow
or orange; but I have been unable to find, and therefore personally do not believe in, the
existence of such lesser white-fronted geese.

These, then, are the reasons why I cannot recognise two separate geographical races
among lesser white-fronted geese, and therefore add 4. rhodorhynchus, Buturlin, as a
synonym of 4. finmarchicus, Gunner.

A further very essential distinction between the greater and lesser white-fronted
species is the fact that, in the latter, the folded wings considerably overlap the tip of the
tail, which is especially clearly to be seen in live birds (as positively asserted by Mr. Finn),
while in living specimens of 4. alézfrons the tips of the wings only very slightly extend
beyond the limit of the tail-feathers, and more often do not reach their tips. I speak here
of live birds, as from dry skins or stuffed specimens it is far more difficult, or even almost
impossible, to judge of this point. |

With regard to the supposed somewhat larger dimensions of eastern examples, it
is to be presumed that this is only a consequence of the fact that a far less number of
western individuals have been measured than of the former. But even granted that the

1 Here it must be borne in mind that the lesser white-fronted goose is known to Dr. Sushkin not only from the Turgai district
but also from the Ryazan Government.

K

66 Geese of Europe and Asia

eastern specimens are really somewhat bigger than the western, this difference is so insig-
nificant as hardly to merit serious attention.

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

Once we unite the eastern and western lesser white-fronted geese, we may in general
ternis define its breeding-grounds as follows. First of all, it nests in Lapland, but has not
(yet?) been found on Kolguev. Although it has not been recorded by any observer from
Novaia Zemlia, it certainly breeds there, as Vasilov has brought thence a specimen of the
adult male. Further, it breeds in the Kaninsk Peninsula, and, probably, throughout the
whole tundra of the northern coast-line of Siberia.

Palmén quotes it for the northern littoral of Siberia as follows: lower course of
Yenisei—604°-70° ; Boganida—7o°; valley of Тайпуг—723°—74 ; west coast of Taimyr
Peninsula—734°; lower reaches of Lena—72°-733°; estuary—71°; north coast of Chukchi-
land—67° М. lat.; and there is no doubt that from the Kaninsk Peninsula, through Yalmal
and to the Yenisei, it breeds wherever convenient spots occur. It also nests in Kamchatka.’
As is justly observed by Mr. Buturlin in his Dike Gust R. £., the migration routes of the
lesser white-fronted goose in European Russia are as yet little investigated, and what we
know of them is still not fully established. This goose passes over all Finland, where 1
have had occasion to observe it in considerable numbers on its autumn migration; it also
occurs on migration in Livonia and near St. Petersburg, as well as in other parts of the
St. Petersburg Government, and in those of Archangel, Olonets, Novgorod in Poland and
Middle Russia; I have also seen vast numbers every autumn for 18 years in the neighbour-
hood of Taganrog. Here it is often long detained in autumn together with the white-fronted
goose, with which it feeds and passes the night in the same spots. Undoubtedly it also
occurs on the Sivash in autumn and winter, as Radde, speaking of the white-fronted goose,
remarks, “оп the Sivash many of them were very small-sized,” which leaves no doubt in my
mind that these “very small-sized” birds were of the lesser species, and, probably, from the
same mass which in autumn keeps in the Azov district sometimes till the end of November.
If it winter on the Sivash, then, especially in hard winters, when almost all the geese
move thence to the south, it must certainly visit the more southern coasts of the Black
Sea, so neglected by ornithologists. The passage of this species along the Volga and
Kama, disputed by Buturlin, I think requires further investigation, as it is far from ascer-
tained, and Г fully admit the possibility of its occurring in some years and being almost
unknown in others, especially if on any line of migration there are no resting-places, so that
the geese, escaping the guns of the fowlers, may easily fly past unnoticed.

Whether it abounds or not on the Птеп (Novgorod Government) I cannot say, but
that it is there a bird of passage is proved by a specimen which served as the original for
Plate 5 of this book, as well as by several other examples seen by myself in St. Petersburg
and also sent from thence. In the Moscow Government it is not mentioned by F. K.
Lorenz; but this district is avoided in its flight not only by this goose but also by its
congener .dzser anser.

From the Ryazan Government it is cited (without any foundation, as a variety of

+ Now in the Zoological Museum of the Imperial Academy of Science of St. Petersburg.

2 That Dybowski failed to find it in Kamchatka is far from proving that it does not nest there. This species was found in
Kamchatka by Steller.

Lesser White-fronted Goose 67

the white-fronted goose) by the late Mr. Khomyakov, and, as we have already seen, by
Dr. Sushkin.

As regards the Kharkov Government, however strange it may seem, this bird was not
met with by Mr. N. N. Somov.

Before speaking of the Siberian birds, I will touch briefly on the visits of this goose
to Western Europe, where it is also not easy to note its appearance. It rarely wanders as
far as Great Britain, where Mr. Abel Chapman shot an undoubted specimen of this
species on September 16, 1886. There is, however, evidence of its straying to England
before this, but these cases are not fully established. It has been observed in Germany,
Holland, Belgium, France, Spain (in Seville, according to Lord Lilford), and probably from
time to time it appears throughout the whole of Western Europe, either in the late autumn
or in winter. Its occurrence is more regular in winter in Greece and Turkey, and it has
been found in North Egypt.

As to lesser white-fronted geese in Northern Siberia, their winter haunts are the
Caspian.and the valley of the Atrek, where they were observed, as we shall see below, Бу
Zhitnikov. The species undoubtedly winters in Persia, in small numbers in India, in South
China, and in Japan. On passage, it is met with in the Transural, in the Turgai district,
and generally in the greater part of Western Siberia, but neither in the Altai nor in the
Thian-Shan has it been seen on migration; and, apparently, neither does it cross the range
of the Caucasus (Radde), so that it seems to avoid mountains generally. It is very common
on Lake Baikal, in Mongolia, Dauria, and the Ussuri district.

Przewalski saw it in very large numbers passing over Lake Khanka. By what
routes it flies to winter in Japan and South China is as yet difficult to determine, mainly
because the unfortunate confusion between the greater and lesser white-fronted geese makes
it now almost impossible to ascertain the exact lines of migration of this species not only in
Asia but in European Russia.

Regarding Turkestan I can say nothing positive, but it is very probable that this
species passes through that area by several routes, and in larger numbers than we think; so
far, however, it is only known from Issyk-kul.

In the Orenburg Government its numbers are insignificant. On the whole, it will take
no small amount of data and time to clear up the lines of flight of the white-fronted goose
in Russia, unless sportsmen will come to the aid of ornithologists, which would be so easy
for them to do almost without any expenditure of time or labour. As, however, to the
explanation of Prof. M. A. Menzbier, that this species, in order to appear on passage in
Poland, the St. Petersburg Government, and Finland, may arrive from its Atlantic and
South Baltic winter quarters, such a view is perfectly unintelligible to me, but this may be
a slip of the pen of the author.

Of the habits of this goose, on the whole, very little is known; and I can only
quote the more important statements of those few authors who have not confused it with
the larger species.

Dr. Sunstr6m communicated to Mr. Dresser that, according to Lieutenant Widmark,
this goose nests in Lapland in localities in the neighbourhood of which the ice holds
during the whole time, and that it breeds in considerable numbers; but he gives no
details. Lieutenant Widmark says that these geese moult about July 1, and he saw a
flock in full moult at the beginning of August. When moulting, they collect in large

65 Geese of Europe and Asia

flocks, and visit spots where the ice never completely disappears, and although then quite
incapable of flight, are so wary that they easily escape from pursuit by running.

The eggs collected in Finmark by Messrs. Wolley, Wheelwright, and Meves, and pre-
served in the British Museum, are 68.5-83 mm. (=2.70-3.27 in.) long, with a diameter of
45.7—49 mm. (= 1.80-1.93 in.). The clutch is sometimes four, but also five and six (Collett).
It must not, however, be supposed that this is the limit. The colouring of the eggs is light
yellowish, and the shell is smooth and rather glossy. On the eggs of one of the above-
mentioned clutches in the British Museum, it is recorded that they were gathered in June:
and оп the Boganida a young bird in down was taken Бу Middendorff as early as June 23,
and on July 29 another was captured, in which the primary and secondary wing-feathers
and scapulars had only just begun to show.

During great migrations these geese usually form in file in the shape of an oblique
or sloping line, but at times in a wedge, like other geese. On short journeys,
and when flying out to feed and home again to their night’s lodging, lesser white-
fronted geese mostly fly in a disorderly compact crowd, uttering the while their cackle,
which is less loud than that of the larger bird. I often saw them flying with the latter
both to water and to the steppe to graze, but I never noticed the flocks mixing,
Many times I saw them together on the river Mius, in the Armenian steppes between the
river Sambek and the Don mouths, and I shall never forget their innumerable flocks
covering, in late autumn, the sand-flats of the Mius estuary, and then flying to feed, partly
to the neighbouring corn-fields, partly to the high grass of the steppe.

I could never even approximately count the number of separate flocks appearing in
autumn, in such continuous streams did they pass, one after another, whichever way I
looked, filling the air with such loud cries that, even now, after many years, the ring of
them still haunts my ears.

Both species alighted together on the fields, covering wide spaces of green corn,
stubble, meadow, or high grass with an unbroken dusky mass. I remember how one year
on an estate near Taganrog these flocks caused considerable damage to the corn, tearing
up young shoots of winter crops (the autumn was rainy and the black earth very sodden),
so that it was actually necessary to send three horsemen to protect the crops and drive off
the countless masses of unbidden guests. I spent much time striving to stalk these birds,
but almost always in vain; and only from the cover of specially dug pits, whither I betook
myself before dawn, did I succeed in bringing down a few of these wary geese. To-day,
recalling the past, I think with regret what success would have attended my efforts had I
had recourse to the American method of shooting these birds, namely, by setting up
dummies as a decoy near the ambush, especially iron profiles, so easily made by any one.
But I then knew nothing of this method, and, to tell the truth, I should hardly have found
time for it, as, simultaneously with the passage of these geese, were flights of woodcock,
snipe, and jack-snipe, in the pursuit of which I was then wholly absorbed.

If, however, as stated in the section on the larger species, the lesser white-fronted
goose traverses the Azov district in such vast flizhts in autumn, on the other hand it is
hardly to be seen in spring. Either, on the way to its breeding-grounds, it flies very
high and does not alight at all, or it takes another route, as the number sometimes
seen during .the spring migration is perfectly insignificant compared with the huge
autumn hosts.

In view of the extreme interest attaching to the observations made by Zhitnikov

Lesser White-fronted Goose 69

on this goose in the Valley of Atrek! during its winter sojourn, which are unique in
respect to this species, I venture to insert quotations from his article, feeling sure of
the assent of the author. “Of the two species of wintering geese, a certain difference
appears in their mode of life between the kazarka? and the grey-lag. When the aryks
(irrigating channels) overflowed their banks in December, and towards the end of the
month caused floods in the steppe, the grey-lags, which hitherto had lived in the rushes,
removed to the flooded land, and there passed the whole winter, making scant use of the
rushes even as а night- shelter; while the lesser kazarka, although also feeding in the
steppe, yet invariably flew back to the rushes to drink and pass the night, keeping near
the bed of the river; the grey-lags, however, settled only in the outskirts of the reed-
beds fringing the washes from the aryks, situated in the steppe a considerable distance
from the Atrek.

‘Early in the morning, with the first gleams of dawn, the kazarkas would raise a-
loud cackle in the rushes, continuing the same without break for several minutes, and then,
with a din baffling all description, would rise almost all in a body, and after circling several
minutes above the rushes, fly off at a great height to the Persian meadows, to feed on the
fresh grass. Sometimes a few flocks flew to the lake in the Russian steppe, probably on
account of the convenience of having a drinking-place near at hand; one or two flocks
even obstinately keeping to the lake as their residence. The most precious moment for the
fowler was the early morning, when the geese rose from their resting-place and flew rather
low above the rushes. About an hour before dawn I usually brought my boat stealthily
into a thicket of reeds on the line of flight of the geese, and waited for them there,
feverishly clutching my gun as I listened to their ceaseless clamour.

Г should here note a strange feature in the character of the kazarka—its irrepressible
curiosity.® Several times, having noticed on the wing the edge of the boat showing
dark among the reeds, or hearing when it was still dark a suspicious rustle due to my
movements, they would make a point of flying towards me at earliest dawn, making straight
for the spot where they had heard the noise. Once, on a misty morning, a flock which was
resting on the river bank heard the splash of the oars, and, having detected my boat, flew
up and made off in my direction, keeping just above the water. Meanwhile, there being no
possibility of concealment, I awaited them sitting motionless in the boat. The whole flock
flew to within sixty paces of me, only swerving aside after two of their number had fallen
to my gun. 7

“T took advantage of this peculiarity of the birds, and, having crept into the reeds,
would rap lightly with the oar on the side of the boat, while it was yet dark; the kazarkas
thus disturbed would set up a loud cackle, and, rising in a hurry, rush headlong towards me.
Of course they pretty soon learned to be shy of all strange sounds from the reeds, but,
to tell the truth, they acquired their experience at the cost of many a good right and left
on my part.

“Оп the Persian side of the river the geese would feed a fairly long time, afterwards
(usually about two or three o'clock, rarely earlier) flying forth, the whole horde together, at
an inaccessible height, to the very bed of the river to drink. Before doing this they would
execute a whole series of evolutions, throwing themselves vertically downwards from a
dizzy height, then soaring gently up and again rushing down headlong, making a half-

1 Psovaya t Ruzheinaya, г9оо. 2 This is said of A. _fiamarchicus.
3 Curiosity is, however, a trait belonging to several other species of geese, as we have already said in the Introduction.

FO Geese of Europe and Asia

circle in a horizontal plane just above the water, and finally alighting either some few
hundred paces from the stream of the Atrek in the shallow water of the washes or Straight
on the oozy banks.

“ Here they would pass ten to fifteen minutes in all, and, again soaring up high into
the air, fly back to Persia. At five to six in the evening the kazarkas again set out for the
marshes to spend the night; flying, however, lower, so that, having posted myself in their
line of flight, I sometimes succeeded in bringing down a bird or two.

“The kazarkas always passed the night on open water, among the flooded reeds, mostly
near the river-bed, and sometimes on its bank. On bright moonlight nights they were ver y
lively, chattering among themselves the whole night ; on rainy nights, on the contrary, they
remained silent, ruffling up their, feathers, and even sometimes passing such nights in the
steppe, where they were probably less disturbed by the patter of the rain than in the reeds—
а habit they have in common with the grey-lag.

“The kazarka, like every other goose, is hard to kill; I had to use №. о and 1
shot, and even then lost many wounded birds.”

The author goes on to quote the dimensions of the birds of this species he killed,
from which it appears that the length of the specimens varied within the limits of 22.62 and
24.40 in. (=574-619 mm.); the wing was mostly 14 in. (=355 mm.).

Farther on, this author says that “the ring around the eyes was yellowish orange, and
the bill dark flesh-colour, but brighter and more rosy than in the grey-lag, with a whitish nail.”

As regards the wintering of this goose in the neighbourhood of Leukoran I prefer
for the present to say nothing, on account of the presumption, stated above, that Radde
confused it with the white-fronted goose, although the fact itself is undoubted, as is clearly
testified by the figure of the head of this species, with culmen 35 mm. (=1.37 in.), on p. 444
of Ornis Caucasica..

In some respects my information with regard to this goose is in direct opposition
to certain statements of Prof. Menzbier, who says in Pfitsy №055: “Ша Central Russia
the lesser white-fronted goose is only a straggler, which is connected with the fact that it
does not winter on the Black Sea. On the other hand, this bird winters in great numbers
on the Caspian, and it is therefore not surprising that it is commonly met with on passage
thence along the Volga and Kama to Western Siberia or vice versa.” Farther on, the reader
who has studied the present notice will see that Prof. Menzbier’s view, “ that, except in size,
it is in no way distinguished from the preceding species” (ле. the white-fronted goose), is
diametrically opposed to mine, seeing that the structure of the bill, the yellow ring round
the eye, the difference in the shape and size of the blaze on the head, and the general
darker brown colouring of the feathering of the upper surface of the body, completely
separate this species from the white-fronted goose, even on a superficial inspection.

In conclusion, I may indicate the reason why I find it necessary to recognise
Anser finmarchicus, Gunner, as the name of this species. In Knud Leem’s book, cited in
the synonymy, we find Gunner’s description, which undoubtedly refers to this bird, while
Linne’s description has as much to do with it as with the white-fronted goose of the Old and
New Worlds.

Here is Gunner’s description of 4. finmarchicus: “Наес minor species vulgo
Finmarke Gaas (Anser Finmarchicus) dicitur et multo minor est Anate Ansere, vel
magnitudine Anatis mollissimae.

Lesser White-fronted Goose 71

“Rostrum ejus etiam brevius est rostro Anatis mollissimae et Anseris feri: immo
posterioris rostrum duplo majus et longius est. Frons alba, unde et linea alba descendit basin
mandibulae superioris utrinque attingens.

‘“Caput et collum fusca vertice nigriore. Nigra sunt tempora. Genae autem et
inferior juguli pars colore aliquantum dilutiores sunt. Subtus multae sunt nigrae maculae.
Rostrum flavum est et pedes sanguinei sunt.’

“Vix dubium super est quin Anser hic noster finmarchicus jam а me descriptus sit Anas
erythropus cinerea, fronte alba, fi. V, 116 et Anas Helsingegaas apud Clusium in exot. р. 368
n. V, nec apud Lucam Debes in Faeroa referata, p. 132 et quidem secundum descriptionem
linnaeanam in fn. f. У speciatim hujus femina. In Ornith. Briinnichii р. 13, No. 54 de
varietate Anseris feri e Cimbria mentio fit, fronte tota alba, abdomine nigro maculato ; quam
varietatem a nonnullis minus recte Trappe Gaas vocari laudatus Auctor meminit. Haec
adeo Anserem nostrum finmarchicum seu Anatem erythropum refert, ut facile utramque
pro eadem haberem si varietatis Briinnichianae magnitudo 14 permittat.”

1 Evidently from dry skins, in which, in the majority of cases, the legs and feet in drying become of a dark flesh-colour of varying depth.

Genus /Ме/мионух, Buturlin (1901)

BEFORE proceeding to describe the various species and races of geese for which Mr. 5. А.
Buturlin in 1go1 established the genus J/e/anonyx (as а sub-genus), I consider it advisable
to discuss the validity of this group, and at the same time to give a short sketch of the
same, since it is impossible to do this when describing its individual members. This
is mainly owing to the fact that these geese have been so mixed up and confused, not only
by sportsmen, but by the majority of ornithologists of all countries, that it is now almost
impossible to unravel the entanglement; and to refer any of the recorded observations
to species with which they perhaps have nothing to do would be worse than to pass them
over. There are, of course, exceptions, and wherever it has been found possible to refer
with certainty observations to the proper species, the reader will find them in their place
in notices devoted to such species.

First of all, I may state that I regard Melanonyx as rightly distinguished and
properly characterised by the author of Dzkze gust Rossitskot tmperit, and, moreover, that
it is entitled to full generic rank. In one detail the definition of the genus given by the
author leaves room for emendation. Mr. Buturlin writes: “ Anseris sub-genus novum,
rostro carneo aut flavescente aurantiaco, basi dertroque nigris, /vonte fusco-grisea, ао
non fasciata, abdomine griseo, шото haud fasciato.”

The character I have underlined in this diagnosis is not applicable to the whole
genus, and even in the adult yellow-billed bean-goose the feathering at the root of the
upper mandible is almost always white, while in certain other species it is sometimes
white, either in the form of a more or less broad fringe, or white patches. As regards
the yellow-billed bean-goose, the white feathering on the forehead at the base of the
upper mandible sometimes attains a breadth of as much as 15 mm. (= 0.59 1n.).

Only in the first year or two, and again in very old age, in this species, are the
white plumules bordering the base of the bill ever completely absent, as has been
demonstrated by observations on specimens kept in captivity in the course of several
decades. Moreover, the white feathering either in the shape of separate plumules or in
the form of a definite patch of varying size, or occupying the mental angle, or even,
as an exception, the whole chin, is met with occasionally in М. arvensis, М. segetum,
М. segetum serrivostvis, М. mentalis, and probably some others.

As to the black nails of both mandibles and the black base of the bill, in connection
with the coloured band on the bill and the absence of black patches on the under-parts,
these characters are quite constant, and sharply distinguish the group Aelanonyx from
all other grey geese. Indeed, only in very old individuals of the yellow-billed bean-
goose is the whole bill to the base occasionally yellow-orange, and then only on the
culmen, between the nares, is a black longitudinal band retained. It should be added

72

Genus Melanonyx 7 2

that, in contradistinction to the representatives of the genus 4muser, in the species
of the genus Me/anonyx the teeth along the edges, in those spots where the mandibles
are coloured black, are of a dark instead of a light hue.

In view of the similarity of colouring and arrangement of the pattern of the
colouring occurring in all the species of this genus, with the sole exception of the
short-billed goose (Welanonyx brachyrhynchus), it would sometimes be difficult, or even
impossible, to determine from skins alone to which species they belong, were it not
for the bill, which almost always permits us to decide with which goose we have to deal ;
and this, too, in spite of any alteration in colouring, which is the more important
seeing that the light areas of the bill rapidly change after death.

The structure and form of the bill, the comparative size and shape of its nails,
and the number of teeth along the tomia of the upper mandible afford, for the most
part, such constant and decisive characters that, when taken together, they fully suffice to
discriminate the species and sub-genera of A/e/anonyx. I therefore discuss in great detail
—perhaps in too great detail—the bill of each representative of this genus under its
respective heading. To the importance of the bill distinguishing the species of this
group of geese I was led by the studies of Mr. Naumann, who with great care
analysed the various differences in the structure of the bills of the yellow- bill
(М. arvensis) and common bean- goose (М. segetum), so that I had only to verify his
investigations and deductions in relation to these two species and strive to apply them
to the other members of the group. In doing so, I succeeded in finding a few additional
characters which strongly confirm the truth of Naumann’s deductions.

Мг. Naumann’s investigations are therefore of great importance, since it was owing
to these that it became possible to discover the connection which exists between certain
East Siberian and European geese of this group. It is true that one of the characters
given by Naumann, namely, the number of teeth along the edges of the upper mandible,
proved wanting in constancy when examining a large collection, but in the majority of
cases even this character may afford great assistance in discriminating species.

Here it may be remarked as strange that, down to our own time, scarcely any
ornithologist has estimated at its true value the important difference in the bills of
the yellow-billed and the common bean-goose, pointed out by Naumann. Much соп-
fusion in the literature on these birds would have been avoided, and our acquaintance
with the geographical distribution and mode of life of the members of the group would
have been increased, had this been known earlier.

Despite all that has been written by Naumann on the bills of these two geese,
the majority of ornithologists seem to believe that the whole point of these distinctions
consisted in a different arrangement of the black and yellow-orange colour; and as
colour alone here plays a secondary part (unless taken in connection with structural
characters), the confusion which Naumann had done so much to abolish was revived.

Such a state of the ‘‘ goose question” produced further unsatisfactory consequences ;
so that, for example, the late Mr. Seebohm latterly affirmed that М. dvachyrhynchus was
nothing more than a slight variety of the bean-goose (М. segetum). Even the totally
different colouring of the whole bird, to say nothing of the bluish ashen-grey wing (recalling
rather the grey-lag than other representatives of the genus Me/anonyx), did not save that
eminent ornithologist from a serious error. This view of Seebohm, to my astonishment,
was finally shared by other ornithologists, among them the late Mr. John Cordeaux.

7A Geese of Europe and Asia

Owing to this state of affairs, the data on the range and habits of the geese of the
group Melanonyx are so confused that, in the majority of cases, it is impossible to refer
them with certainty to any particular species; and accordingly they are given here only in
their most general features, and have been almost entirely omitted in the descriptions of the
species.

In the main, bean-geese are natives of the Far North, and only in Siberia (chiefly
eastern) does the region of their nidification descend considerably lower than in more
westerly countries. This, perhaps, is explained partly by the severity of the Siberian climate,
and partly by the fact that in Europe these geese have been driven back northwards by man
or, more probably, by the reduction, due to cultivation, of free and suitable spaces, so neces-
sary for such shy birds. “The bean-goose,” writes Professor Menzbier, “is an extremely
cautious bird, and knows well how to avail itself of its strong and rapid flight, as also its
skill in swimming and diving, to escape danger.” This is perfectly true, as appears from
the following observations on the extraordinary capacity of this goose for diving.

Once, during the autumn migration, on one of the lakes in Finland (Vyborg Govern-
ment), I succeeded in knocking over with a charge of slugs a goose of this species from a
flock flying high overhead. Having fallen with a loud cackle ina somewhat inclined direction,
the bird, evidently only slightly touched in the wing, splashed heavily against the surface of
the water some 70 paces from my boat and at once dived. A few seconds later it came up
again, at not less than 200 paces; in other words, it only required a few seconds to swim this
distance under water. Having dived again, it reappeared on the shore of the lake, 4oo
paces off, and hid in the sedge. All this happened with such rapidity that, had I not been
myself the cause and witness of the occurrence, I should never have conceived the possibility
of such rapid motion under water ; for this goose surpassed all I had hitherto seen of the
kind among waterfowl. Once, indeed, I remember a cormorant, which I had wounded,
behave in a somewhat similar manner under water, eventually escaping as quickly as did
this goose. |

As to the wariness of the geese of the group Мемиопух, | have come to the con-
clusion that all geese without distinction are equally wary, once they have recognised danger,
despite the fact that they are comparatively confiding before making acquaintance with man.

In a later passage оп this goose, Professor Menzbier remarks that: “ Its voice hardly
differs from that of the grey-lag, and the bird makes use of it by imparting to its ordinary
cry various modulations according to the different exigencies of its life.”

Personally, I must own to being familiar in this group only with the note of М.
arvensis, which indeed varies greatly according to circumstances. Thus the usual gagd-gaga
or nasal gouk-génk-génk-khonk is sometimes uttered only once as a sonorous, deep #/onk,
and is very different when uttered by the bird on the wing or when the flock is sitting on
the water. The quiet cackle again differs from the alarm-note; and the low chatter of a
peaceful flock has a character of its own. Although I do not doubt that considerable differ-
ences in the cries of different species of this group of geese exist, I deny the possibility of
expressing in letters any one of these sounds. Personally, I can distinguish without fail the
cackle of a flock of white-fronted geese from that of a flock of JZ. arvensis, and any observant
fowler can of course do the same; but no one, I think, is able to express in words the differ-
ences of these sounds.

As regards the food of the bean-geese, Professor Menzbier writes that they are

Genus Melanonyx as

exclusively herbivorous birds, which graze on young crops. To this, however, it should be
added, not only on young crops but also on corn-stubbles, in rice-fields, and in general wherever
any garden or other cultivated plants have grown, these geese are able to make a living; and
that as goslings they also eat animal food in the shape of insects, snails, crustaceans, and even
fish-roe. In summer and autumn, like all other geese, they consume in large quantities all
kinds of berries, especially the bilberry, of which there is no lack on the tundra. The summer
life of the bean-geese is almost entirely unknown. In fact we only know that the broods begin
to combine very early into more or less considerable flocks, and that towards the moulting
season of the old birds, that is, when the latter begin to lose their flight-feathers, and the
goslings are not yet fledged, the wanderings of the flocks (sometimes several hundreds
strong) to considerable distances on foot commence. ‘That the geese seek at this time more
remote and retired spots in which to pass this most trying and dangerous period in their life
is beyond doubt. Such movements do not, however, constitute a peculiarity of the geese of
the genus Melanonyx alone, but are common to the majority of other geese. We have
already seen, for example, that this tendency to wandering manifests itself with still greater
force in the grey-lag goose; and it is common to other kinds.

The well-known sketch of such a migration of bean-geese in Mr. Seebohm’s Szderia
ги L:uvope, which was taken in the Pechora district, is very graphic, but loses almost all its
interest and importance owing to our ignorance of the species to which it refers, as these
might be yellow-billed or common bean- geese, the author making no distinction between
the two forms. |

It is a bad look-out for the geese if, during such a migration, they are observed by
man. The Samoyeds and other Siberian natives at such times supply themselves with
goose-meat in enormous quantities, so that their store is sometimes more than sufficient to
feed not only themselves but their dogs too for the whole year and more. This distinction
is, however, by no means confined to the bean-geese, but is shared by the whole anserine
tribe, wherever it has man for a neighbour.

Further details of the summer habits of this group of geese are lacking, but judging
from a few observations made in East Siberia we may conclude that, from the first
essay of the goslings at flight, there commence the movements of separate broods or
flocks for the fields to feed, and these continue during the autumn and winter.

These geese ordinarily go afield twice in the twenty-four hours, returning to the water
in the day and again for the night. Often, however, they fly in the daytime to rest on
water other than that where they pass the night. This, however, is not always so, and
I know for certain a place in the south where white-fronted geese resort together with
bean-geese (although these are few) for their daily rest and nightly shelter to the same
extensive estuary.

“The winter life of the bean-geese,” writes Professor Menzbier, ‘‘is monotonous in
the extreme. By day they feed in the fields and in the steppe, and fly away for the night
either to those parts of rivers which do not freeze, or to the sea.”

I may add that, during the daily rest, the bean-geese do not stay long on the water,
and, where possible, having drunk their fill, swim off to the shoals or land on sandbanks or
islands. During rest, and when feeding, these geese throw out sentinels, from time to time
relieved by others, which have already rested or satisfied their hunger. Sentinels are also
placed at night to watch the sleeping flock. |

Neither on the sea nor on lakes and rivers do geese pass the night on open water, but

76 Geese of Europe and Asia

having swum about and chattered among themselves, the flocks either swim into the growth
along the banks or push out on to the shoals, to spend the time in rest, till the first gleams
of the rising sun. Only for want of such spots do scared flocks in rare cases pass the
night on open water.

Bean-geese nest either on the tundra or on the shores of lakes, some species preferring
those near woods, for the most part making the hollow for the nest on the top of a
tussock of grass. The depression is lined first with grass, generally dry, and above with
the bird’s own down.

The number of eggs in a clutch varies from three to six, but I think that sometimes
the latter number must be considerably greater. Further information with regard to the
eggs will be found in the Appendix.

In the only geese of this group (AZ. arvensis) which I have personally observed, in
Finland in September and October, the daily life was as follows. At dawn they flew from
their night shelter on the shore of the lake to the adjacent fields, and towards ten o’clock
returned to bathe in the water (always in the shallowest parts of the lake near the shore), and
to rest for an hour or two. After complete quiet and silence in the flock, some of the geese
would begin to chatter, at first in a low tone, singly, then the sound increased to a noisy
clamour, as if the whole flock was engaged in a wrangle; at times the entire assembly would
rise into the air with a loud cackle, striking the surface of the water with great force on
getting up, and after describing a small circle or two in the air, again descending to
the spot whence they started, when, little by little, their cries would again subside. About
four oclock, with a fearful and combined din, caused by the blows of hundreds of wings
upon the water, the geese would all rise together, sometimes two or three large flocks, that
had been resting side by side, and set off once more to the morning grazing-grounds, or at
any rate in that direction. If no one disturbed them, the flocks would always journey by the
same aérial route. By this manner, having well noted the routes, and having concealed
oneself behind shelter on their line of flight, one might with assurance await their return,—a
device to which local fowlers of course have recourse.

In general, this habit of constantly pursuing one and the same line of flight is strange
and difficult to explain. It occurs not only among geese, but among many other birds, as,
for example, bustards, grey partridges on the southern steppes, swans, etc. I was always
struck by this phenomenon, when I lived in a locality where I often saw the passage of
birds in great masses, especially during spring migration. It is also interesting to note
that these routes sometimes remain constant during a long series of years.

During the long hours passed in a skiff hidden in a mass of reeds or in a shed,
waiting for swans, geese, or ducks, I have often thought over this question, trying to find
an explanation. Possibly I have obtained a clue, although it would be premature to
disclose inferences founded on incomplete observations of the facts of the phenomenon.

Bean-geese, mainly М. arvensis, fly pretty freely to decoys, if the latter are not far
removed from their line of flight, and thus, owing to their curiosity, often become the
victim of the fowler. It is still better if the decoys are provided with live geese attached by
strings. This method of taking geese is regularly practised here and there in many parts
of Russia, as, for example, on Lake Ilmen, on the Surgut, and in other places, but
unfortunately there are hardly any detailed accounts of this form of capture. It seems,
however, that it is almost a matter of indifference whether the decoy birds are made to look

1 Six is a full clutch, ¢.g. for the yellow-bill (4Z. arvensis), according to Gébel for Lapland and the Otonets Government.

Genus Melanonyx 79

natural or not, provided their colour be approximately true. The more life-like they are,
however, the better is the chance of their attracting the geese. If the decoy be arranged on
land, somewhere near the feeding-grounds of the flock, it is sufficient to make mere profiles
of geese, of iron or other material, painted as near as possible the colour of nature.

For further details concerning the geese of this group, however scanty, the reader
may refer to the separate headings of each species.

In conclusion, I desire once more to direct the attention of future observers of geese
to my conviction that, at least in the species of the genus Me/anonyx, the number of teeth
along the edges of the upper mandible increases with age, that is, that in the young there
are somewhat fewer of these teeth than in full-grown birds.

SUSHKIN’S GOOSE
MELANONVX NEGLECTUS, SUSHKIN
Pilate т

English—Sushkkin’s Bean-Goose; Pink-footed Goose (erroneously for India?); Large Pink-
Jooted Goose (Frohawk). |
Russian—Ufimski gumenntk (Buturlin) ; gumenntk krasnonosy (Menzbier).

Anser neglectus, Sushkin, Bull. Brit. Ornith. Club, у. р. vi. 1895; zd, “Ibis,” 1897, iil. р. 5; 24., Ptitsy Ufimsk.
gub. 1807, р. 69; Madarasz, Gyuld-tdl, Természetrajzi Fiizetek. Кое, ххш. 1900, р. 75
(Ungar, Ornis); Karamzin, Pt. Bugur. i dr. uyezd. i Beleb. и. Ufim. g. (1901), р. 181; Buturlin,
Sinoptich. tabl. Okh. Pt. Ross. Imp., р. 43 (1901); 2%, Opred. Plastinch. (“ Psov. i Ruzh. Okhota,”
1900); Oates, Game Birds India, ii. р. 75 (1899); Menzbier, ОКВ. i Prom. Pt. Ross. i Kavk.,
р. 470, pl. 135 (1902); Buturlin, “Po Severu Rossii” (Zhitkov i Buturl.), 1901, р. 84; Sushkin, MS.
letters to Author; Frohawk, “The Field,’ 1902, Dec. 20, р. 1045; Sorokin, V., О prolete визе,
“Psov. 1 Ruzh. ОКБ.” Jan. 1903, pt. iii. р. 113 (Ryazansk. gub.); Semenov, “ Rossiya,” ii. chap.
ili. р. 104 (1902).

Melanonyx neglectus (Sushkin), Buturlin, Dikie Сия Ross. Imp. (“ Psov. i Ruzh. Okhota,” 1901, Feb.-April) ;
24., sep. ипре., р. 27 (1901).

? Anser odscurus (Brehm), Зеуе оу, Vert. i Goriz. Raspr. Turk. Zh., р. 149 (1873).

? Anser segetum (partim !), Trevor-Battye, Ice-bound on Kolguev, р. 423 (1895) (Rostro pedibusque subrosets vel
carnets). | | |

? Auser brachyrhynchus, Hume and Marshall, Game Birds India, iii. р. 71 (1880); ? Blanford, Fauna Brit. India,
iv. p. 418 (1898); ? Oates, Man. Game Birds India, ii. p. 65 (Pink-footed Goose) (1899); ? Finn, How
to Know the Indian Ducks, р. 17 (1901).

? Anser medius, Cordeaux (nomen nudum), Brit. Birds, their Nests and Eggs, pl. 15, р. 68 (1896).

р? А зе’ oatesz, Rickett, Bull. Brit. Orn. Club, xi. р. 46 (1900-1901).

Dr. Sushkin, who first discovered and described this species of goose, has kindly
allowed me to make the fullest use of both the description of the bird itself and the
observations made on its habits detailed with such a masterly hand in his Ptitsy Ufimskot
gubernit. Т have been compelled to avail myself very freely of this permission, although
the greater part of that author’s article has already been reproduced in several journals,
and by Professor Menzbier in his Okhotnichi г promyslovya ptitsy Vevropeiskot Rossi 1
Kavkaza, where this goose was figured for the first time.

“This species is distinguished from 4. drachyrhynchus,’ writes Dr. Sushkin, “Бу
greater size, longer and more robust bill, and by the fact that the secondary coverts are
black-brown, and thus of another colour to the main coverts. From 4. segetum it 1s
distinguished by the dark flesh-colour of the legs and median part of the bill.

“Аз concerns the colour-differences of the plumage of the new goose from
A. segetum, the colouring of the head and neck is darker than in the latter, and the margins of
the feathers of the upper side and of the dark feathers of the flanks of the body are browner.

78

Sushkin’s Goose 79

In some specimens, just as in 4. segetum, is observable a slight admixture of white feathers
at the very root of the upper mandible.” |

This comparatively short description is quite sufficient to indicate the main differences
in the plumage and the colouring of the bill of Sushkin’s goose from its congeners—the
bean-goose and M. brachyrhynchus. But, regarding the structure of the bill, it will not be
superfluous to add the following details, as they will allow of the discrimination of this goose
from dry skins, the bills of which have lost their original colouring. Thus the bill of
Sushkin’s goose is comparatively weak and narrow; from the bill of М. segetum it is
distinguished by its far less depth at the base, and in particular by the feebler lower mandible,
of which the greatest thickness visible from without, when the beak is shut, varies between
6 and 6.5 mm. (=0.23-0.25 in.). In an adult М. neglectus and in a young female in first
plumage this dimension was only 5.5 mm. (=0.21 in.), while in all the specimens of
М. segetum examined the greatest depth of the lower mandible under the same conditions
varied between 7$ and 11 mm. (=0.29-0.43 in.). A still more marked difference is
presented by the shape and comparative size of the nail on the upper mandible; but to
describe this distinction is more difficult than to express it by a sketch, which I have
accordingly done.

As to the number of teeth on the sides of the upper mandible (a feature on which I
laid great stress when I began to study the geese, but which I afterwards had to acknowledge
to be lacking in constancy), this varies in adults between 25 and 28, while in two young
specimens I found 23 and 24 of these teeth respectively, which again convinces me that the
number of teeth in geese increases up toa certain age. It is thus evident that, in freshly
killed birds, when the colouring of the soft-parts has not yet lost its true tint, Sushkin’s
goose may be distinguished from all its nearest kin without any trouble, and if there exist a
resemblance, in the colouring of bill and legs, between this goose and М. brachyrhynchus,
the dimensions of the bill and different colouring of the wing-coverts of the latter will at
once afford a distinction.

In his description of this goose, Dr. Sushkin mentions the fact that in certain
examples, “as in /М. segetum, there is observed a slight sprinkling of white plumules at the
very base of the upper mandible.”

In the notice of AZ. segetum it is stated that I have personally never seen these white
feathers in specimens of this latter species; but, as appears from the above remarks of Dr.
Sushkin, as well as from the observations of an individual fully competent to discriminate
between the bean-goose and the yellow-bill, whitish but not white or grey-white feathers
are sometimes to be met with at the base of the upper mandible in the bean-goose.
Although I have no right to doubt this statement, I must suppose that, if such white or
whitish plumules are to be met with in the bean-goose, it is only in a very limited number,
not comparable with what we see in the yellow-billed goose. I should, therefore, much like
to know to’what extent these white feathers may sometimes manifest themselves in
Sushkin’s goose, and to this point I may direct the attention of ornithologists and
sportsmen.

As regards the disposition and depth of colour of the plumage in Sushkin’s and the
bean-goose, I have been unable to find any distinctive differences; the more so since the
bean-goose is subject to very considerable variations in colour. Some examples of the
latter species are, for instance, very dark, probably owing to age.

Во Geese of Europe and Asia

DIMENSIONS OF ADULT BIRDS OF Вотн ФЕХЕ$

Total length . : ; ; 746-838 mm. (= 29.4—33 in.).
Ехрапзе 1524—1651 mm. (= 60—65 in.).
Wing. ; - 452-485 mm. (= 17.7—19 in.).
Culmen, а. 55—63 mm. (= 2.16-2.48 in.).
Culmen, curved 57—67 mm. (= 2.24—2.63 in.).
Greatest depth of lower и. with bill то 6—6.5 mm. (=0.23—0.25 11.).
Tarsus . ‘ 75-79 mm. (Е 2.05—3.11 in.).

Number of teeth on oe 5 рее т. 23— -28.
Weight, up to 94 Russian lbs. (Sorokin).

The annexed table shows the relations existing between certain dimensions ip
individual specimens. Undoubtedly, with fuller material, there will be obtained larger
fluctuations than those given, and we are at present far from being able to judge of the
extreme dimensions of this goose.

|

Greatest depth,

Sex. Wing. Culmen (curve). Culmen (straight), | Number of Teeth. | lower mandible, Remarks,
shut bill.
mm. in. mm. in. mm. in. mm, ie Bese |

г ? ? 58.— 226 28 6.50 =.25 Zoolog. Mus., St. Petersburg.

= 463 = 18.2 ? 60 = 2.36 26 or 25 6 = 0.23 British Museum.

р 465 = 18.3 бо = 2.36 57 = 2.24 26 р

р 465 = 18.3 59-222 56 = 2.20 27 р

р 485 = 4 67 = 2.6 63 == 245 25 р : ‘

р ne = be а = ae с 2. 26 2 Coll В. В. Sushkin.

р 483 = т9 05 2744 EO 2,32 26 p

? Я. 57 22a 0 a7 р

$. р ? бо = 2.36 26? 2 Hungary. Dr. Madarasz.
Ф му р р ВЕ 24 те 0.2 Persia, Seistan. М. А. Zarudny.
ау. 418 = 16.40 wa 55 = 2.10 23 р Novaia Zemlia. Nosiloy.

YounNG BIRDS IN First PLUMAGE

These differ from the adults first of all by the narrower feathers of the body,
as is generally the case with all young geese compared with old. Tips of feathers on
neck light whitish grey. Under-parts light dingy grey, with tinge of ochreous and
darker rounded grey centres to feathers; vent and tail-coverts—upper and lower—
dingy white, perhaps due to dustiness of skin. Head and neck brown, with strong
coffee tint.

Mr. N. A. Zarudny, the well-known explorer of Transcaspia, sent me a specimen
to study, on the label of which is written: “Seistan, $ му. 9/xi.: legs dingy raspberry,
band on bill rosy.” Не informs me that the goose sent was wounded, and afer Oe
with clipped wings, set at liberty for a time in the vice-consulate garden.

This specimen of Sushkin’s goose shot by Mr. Zarudny has considerable value in
determining the distribution of the species. In an example from Novaia Zemlia, which
is probably in its first plumage (prior to the beginning of the second moult), the feathers
are greatly worn and the tips of those on the neck whitish. This specimen was brought
from Novaia Zemlia by Mr. Nosilov.

Sushkin’s Goose SI

(GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

However strange it may appear, yet this goose, discovered and described only in
the last decade of the past century, is far from having the limited range which might
be supposed. Most astonishing of all is the circumstance that such a distinct, beautiful,
and apparently common goose (judging from its passage through the Ufa Government)
should have escaped notice during so many years by sportsmen and ornithologists alike.
Its breeding on Kolguev appears to be almost certain, while that in Novaia Zemlia is
fully proved. At any rate the bean-geese of Kolguev, with rosy bills and feet, mentioned
by Mr. Trevor-Battye, can scarcely be anything else than this species, as Mr. Buturlin! and
Professor Menzbier? have already pointed out.

In the summer of 1902 Mr. Buturlin did not, however, find this species on Kolguev ;
but he was on the island when the moulting was already over and all the geese could fly,
and, as is well known, it is then difficult to obtain Specimens.

On the other hand, this explorer saw heads of this goose from Matochkin Shar
during his expedition the same year to Novaia Zemlia, as is stated in the Appendix.

The second, but quite certain, home of this goose is Novaia Zemlia, whence Nosilov
brought, as I have already stated, one specimen, now in Moscow. Further, thanks to
ornithological investigations in the Ufa Government, we know that this species is common
there on migration; and it was from the description of it by Dr. Sushkin that Dr.
Madarasz recognised it in winter near Panskov in Hungary, where apparently it must be
a not uncommon visitor, although taken by ornithologists for the short-billed goose on
account of the rosy flesh-colour of the soft-parts.
| Thus, Hungary may be considered either lying on the line of migration of this
species or, perhaps, one of its winter haunts. Another undoubted winter resort of this
species is Seistan in Persia, whence a young female was brought by Mr. Zarudny. This
latter fact affords grounds for surmising that the so-called М. bvachyrhynchus which,
from time to time, has been secured in winter in India, belonged to this species, and
not to the species above named, which could not possibly get there. If this be so,
there can be no further doubt that Sushkin’s goose must be met with on passage in
various parts of the region lying between the extreme points where it has hitherto been
recorded.’ It may indeed be that М. meglectus occurs also in other parts of Europe, and
I have grounds for believing that it strays in winter even to England. This is suggested
by the circumstance that the late Mr. J. Cordeaux, in his notice of the short-billed goose,!
states that he from time to time came across geese so different from that species and the
ordinary bean-goose that he raised the question whether there might not be another race
of goose—A user medius—in Great Britain.

It seems to me clear that such examples could only belong to М. neglectus (from
Novaia Zemlia or Kolguev) or to the enigmatic М. carneirostris of Buturlin. As to whether
this species nests in the Turgai district near Urkach, as stated to Dr. Sushkin by Mr.
Nazarov, nothing can now be said, and although, as Mr. Buturlin justly observes, this is
difficult to admit, yet we have no right to absolutely deny its possibility. Indeed, we now

1 Dikie gust Rossiiskot Пиреги.

2 Okhotnichi г promysiovyya piitsy Yevropetskot Rosstz.

3 In 1902 it was got by Mr. Sorokin in the Ryazan district of the government of the same name, on its autumn passage.
+ John Cordeaux, British Birds, their Nests and Eggs, pl. 15, р. 68 (1896).

M

82 Geese of Europe and Asia

know that certain species of the genus MM/e/anonyx breed very far southward in East
Siberia; and it is quite probable that some of the references quoted under a note of inter-
rogation in the bibliography to the notice of the short-billed goose really pertain to
M. neglectus, although this is now hardly possible to verify.

Moreover, it is possible, and even probable, that it is to a specimen of the latter
species from the Timsk district, Kursk Government, that the passage in the first number of the
Okhotnichya Gazeta for 1900 (р. 3) refers. “А goose,” it is stated, “ wounded here, lived
in our fowl-yard thirteen years. It was small and neatly built, with a fairly slender neck
and elegant head. Its plumage was dark grey, the bill black with a regular transverse
rose-red bar a centimetre in width. This goose was wounded in the wing, but soon
recovered, although it could not fly. It became quite used to captivity, and was not shy,
although when trying to conceal itself from observation it would press its head to its
breast.”

Farther on the author continues: ‘‘He never parted from his little Russian wife.
While she sat for weeks together on her eggs, he patiently stood or sat near the nest. He,
however, treated his offspring inhospitably, trying to drive them away from himself and
their mother. The half-wild geese reared in our poultry-yard were small-sized (although
larger than the father), with rather dark-coloured plumage, and the bill half black with a
light point, but lacking a rose-red ring.”

Of course, it is not clear from the above passage whether the bird was a Sushkin’s
or a short-billed goose, as there is nothing definite in the description; but, seeing that not
a single trustworthy occurrence of the pink-footed goose in Russia has been noted, while
it is beyond doubt that Sushkin’s goose must have lines of migration through European
Russia, probability is on the side of the supposition that the rose-billed goose observed
in the Kursk Government belonged to the present species. Recently, in the January
number of Psovaya г Ruzhetnaya Okhota for 1903, Dr. Sushkin in an article, “О prolete
gusel, reports that he killed in September 1902 two Sushkin’s geese in the Ryazan
district of the Ryazan Government from two different flocks.

Accordingly, if we connect by lines the extreme points where this species has
been certainly seen, that is, on the one hand, Novaia Zemlia with Hungary and,
on the other, with Seistan, passing through the Ufa Government, we shall obtain a
very extensive range. Moreover, if we are assured that the species strays to Great
Britain, India, and even Japan (where Mr. Swinhoe speaks of it under the name of
A. brachyrhynchus), we shall obtain an idea of the wide geographical distribution of
this goose, which, it would seem, is more widely spread than its congeners.
| Now that, thanks to the labours of Messrs. Sushkin, Madarasz, Menzbier, and
Buturlin, the determination of this species has become fairly complete, let us hope that
our information with regard to its range and Habits will ere long become proportionally
enlarged.

Dr. Sushkin writes as follows on the subject: ‘Observations on the autumn
migration were carried on in the Belebeevsk and neighbouring part of the Ufimsk
districts, in the environs of Asly-kul and Shungak-kul. The flocks, so far as could
be discerned, were moving S.W.S. Of nine geese secured, eight, as already stated,
belonged to 4. neglectus, and only one to the true 4. segetum. Besides this, by
observing from my hiding-place the behaviour of the geese on the wing, I was able to
examine carefully through a binocular probably hundreds of them, and only once or twice

Sushkin’s Соозе. 8

did I see geese with the feet and centre of bill orange ; all the rest, with the exception of
stragglers of 4. cinereus accidentally occurring in the flocks of bean-geese, were 4. meglectus.
The goose with the feet and centre of bill dark flesh-coloured is well known to the local
Tatars and Bashkirs; „4. segefwm, on the contrary, is unknown to most of them, and
native fowlers to whom I showed my specimen regarded it as a rare or unknown bird.
Intelligent local sportsmen usually called geese with a black nail to the bill and coloured
feet bean-geese, but such of them as paid attention to the colouring of the bill and
feet constantly spoke of their rosy tint. Since 4. neglectus collects in the Ufa district
in enormous flocks, I think Eversmann’s statements regarding 4. arvensis and A.
segetum partly refer to this goose. The statements communicated by Messrs. Bogdanov
and Ruzski as to bean-geese occurring on the Kama certainly refer partly to 4.
segetum; but whether „Ч. meglectus also occurs on the Kama is not known. It is also
unknown where 4. neglectus is found beyond the limits of the Ufa Government: but
it may be averred with certainty that it is not met with either in Turkestan or near
Moscow; neither did I find it in the western part of the Turgai territory, although I
shot many geese there. In like manner the nesting range of this goose is still unknown.
Mr. Р. >. Nazarov informed me, indeed, that in the neighbourhood of Urkach, in the
Turgai territory, he had observed geese breeding which agreed with the description
of 4. neglectus Г sent him; yet I do not venture to regard this as evidence of the
occurrence of that species, and will merely remark that in general the nesting of any
bean-goose so far south is opposed to the present state of our knowledge of the
distribution of these birds."

‘In this ignorance of its breeding range, it is difficult to express а definite
opinion as to the taxonomic importance and relation to 4. segetum of A. neglectus.
I regret also to have to say that I did not succeed in obtaining a single skeleton, and a
later attempt to get such an example from one of the local fowlers resulted in failure.
In any case, it must be acknowledged that, in the first place, a passage from
A. segetum to A. neglectus has not been indicated; and, secondly, that the latter form
—at any rate in certain localities—is very numerous.

“Passing on to such observations on the migration and manner of life of
A. neglectus as | was able to make, it may be noted that in spring, from April 16 to
May 3, I observed near Ufa, and in the neighbourhood of Shungak-kul, flocks, at times
very large, composed of some kind of bean-geese. The birds were hurriedly flying north-
east, the formation of the skein being a wedge or a straight line, obliquely disposed to
the direction of flight. Judging by the results which were yielded by the autumn
passage, I am inclined to think that at least a considerable portion of these flocks
consisted of 4. weglectus. The autumn migration of 4. ueglectus in 1801 began on
September 21, after the departure of 4. cinereus; such a relation between the two,
according to the Bashkirs, being the rule. In the afternoon of that day four large flocks
of .4. meglectus were noted, with about a hundred birds in each, flying S.W.S., the
formation of one of them being a wedge, while the other three were so arranged that
from each angle a line extended sideways perpendicular to the direction of flisht. The
call of the migrants was audible in the night; and on the following day there was a

1 A Kirgiz told me that on Lake Cholkar-igyz-kara, on the watershed between the head-waters of the Irgiz and. Tobol, a goose
nests which is not 4. cinereus, In 1894, when I was on this lake, it had already dried up, and there were no geese Шете, —

Р. Р. SUSHKIN,

84 Geese of Europe and Asia

mass of these geese on the stubbles, winter-sown fields, and the steppe around Shungak-kul,
Many spots presented from a distance the appearance of having been ploughed over-
night, to such an extent were they blackened by the flocks of geese. On the next day there
were still more birds. During the whole time it was fine autumn weather, but it became
gradually colder. On September 29 I drove to Asly-kul, where, near the lake, I observed
such a mass of geese as defied enumeration. The flocks flying on to the lake literally
eclipsed the sun’s light, and when rising from the fields dazzled the eyes, glittering like
snowflakes in a storm. Towards night it began to freeze, with a clear sky and a high
wind, and by the following day the geese had sensibly diminished in numbers. On
October 1 I was again at Shungak-kul; the weather had changed, snow and rain
alternating with clear frosty weather, which was succeeded by a thaw. The number of
geese kept decreasing, and the last gaggles were observed on October 4.

“The mode of life of user neglectus during its halts while migrating is pretty
simple. The geese feed in the field or steppe, pass the night on lakes and staritsas (ancient
river-beds filled with stagnant water), and fly there to drink in the course of the day. Sun-
rise already finds them feeding. Here and there in the stubbles and winter crops or on the
steppe are scattered the grazing flocks in dark patches, and only rarely a small belated
gaggle appears, the members of which, with loud cries, fly from the lake to join their com-
panions. The feeding geese move slowly in one mass farther and farther, leaving the crops
behind them considerably trodden down, calling all the time to each other in a low tone.
The sonorous notes of the leaders are then rarely heard, and almost always indicate the
approach of danger. On the fowler’s appearance the geese raise а cackle, the flock rises,
and if there is no shot, alights again some 150 paces farther on, as if testing the patience of
the sportsman. By noon the geese are satisfied and eat more slowly, occasionally uttering
a cry and preening their feathers; and, finally, the flock rises and flies to water. For the
noonday drink the gaggles arrive at different times. Usually the geese may be found by
day on the water between eleven and two o'clock, but if the weather be dry and the sun
rather hot, they begin to fly to water from ten o’clock, while if the weather be wet, especially
if snow has fallen, many flocks pass the whole day feeding, satisfying their thirst with the
moisture of their damp food. А flock just arrived on the water will sometimes whirl in a
circle before settling, but usually drops straight from a considerable height. It is a curious
sight to behold when, in descending on the water, a goose will rush headlong downwards,
executing twists and turns that might excite the envy of a duck. Not knowing this trick, I
often missed the chance for a shot. The flock flies high, out of range, when all at once the
geese throw themselves down with such speed as to produce a swishing noise, and rush
past the gunner’s hiding-place. Then the flock drops on to the water usually some distance
from the shore; the geese settle, drink, bathe, and then rise and again fly to the field.
Their place is at once taken by other flocks, and although each passes not more than half an
hour on the water, geese are to be seen there during the whole of the time devoted to
drinking, the air being filled with the hustle of skeins coming and going. The scene may
be particularly well observed on some small mere, where the geese are of necessity crowded.
Still more interesting is the scene presented by the arrival of the geese on the lake to pass
the night. In order to get a full view of this, I lay in wait from three in the afternoon.
The time for drinking was already past ; only a few belated flocks were left, soon to leave
the lake. To get within shot of these would be difficult ; besides, firing would certainly hinder
further observations. Having arranged an ambush in the reeds or bushes, I used to take

Sushkin’s Goose 8 5

up my position, there to remain till the arrival of the geese. As will presently appear, the
twigs of the ambush must be so bent or tied that the seated gunner should not be visible
from above. With the departure of the last skeins, the lake is wrapped in silence, only
broken by the shrill notes of titmice and buntings. From time to time flocks of ducks fly
down and settle on the lake, but again one must refrain from shooting, and when the
arrival of the geese is approaching, the ducks must be scared away or they will spoil every-
thing. Geese, not only 4. weglectus, but all species I have seen, usually settle on the
water with great precautions, but, once alighted, they become quiet, and the gunner may
for convenience of shooting even show himself out of his ambush, especially at dusk; ducks,
on the contrary, rush headlong on to the water, and most of them, especially the common
wild duck, continually keep a sharp look-out in all directions, and the moment one sees any-
thing uncanny it begins to quack, when all remove to a distance from the suspicious object,
alarming all other birds near by. About an hour before sunset the foremost goose, the
leader of some large flock, appears on the lake, keeping the whole time at a height of not
less than two gunshots, flying over the shores of the lake chosen for night shelter, or (if the
lake be a large one, broken up by stretches of reeds into a series of smaller patches of open
water) over the edges of such spaces. Uttering all the time its loud double note, the leader
hovers over the lake, flies a little aside, again returns, and whirls round several times above
each suspicious object. If the fowler lying in wait notices the goose hovering above him,
he must not stir оп any account. Sometimes the goose will fly off to some other lake in
the neighbourhood, and after looking at it will return to complete its inspection. This
done, the bird again flies to the field, and, after a certain interval, about a quarter of an hour,
when the sun is going down, will return with a companion, when the examination is begun
over again. The pair now fly perceptibly lower over the lake, and the loud cry constantly
alternates with a low cackle, as if the geese were having a talk. Iam inclined to think that
the foremost goose is a male and the second a female, as it has always seemed to me that
the second bird is smaller than the first, and its voice nothing like so sonorous. This
examination concludes by the two birds settling on the middle of the lake, drinking, shak-
ing their wings, and then flying up. The second goose again flies round the shores of the
lake, but now much lower, so that a lucky shot may bring it down; while the foremost
bird, whirling in wide circles, rises ever higher and higher, its note resounding louder and
louder in the evening calm. Finally, from the field whence the foremost goose appeared
is heard a confused sound, at first hardly audible but gradually increasing in volume. The
geese have started from the field. The sound becomes more and more audible, till it is
clear that it is not a continuous rumble but the sum of many hundreds of voices, and the
foremost goose sets off to meet the approaching squadrons. The cry rises to an incredible
intensity, the rustle of hundreds of wings is heard, like the whistle of a storm sweeping over
a forest, and the geese begin to drop on to the lake from every side, at first in the middle
and then nearer and nearer to the shores. The cackling, splashing on the water, and
flapping of wings produce an indescribable din. Once at such a moment my muzzle-loader
misfired, but the sharp crack of the cap did not disturb the geese, as they probably did not
hear it. By degrees all quieten down and one hears the reassuring low cackle of the old
birds. If the weather is not calm, the geese always swim against the wind and crouch
under the reeds or bushes on the windward side of the lake, but I have not noticed whether
they land. On the vast Asly-kul, the shores of which for the greater part of their extent
are bare and in many places steep, the geese in calm weather pass the night on the middle

36 _ Geese of Europe and Asia

of the lake,’ and only during a high wind swim to shelter under the cliffs, Unfortunately,
I was unable to note at Asly-kul whether the old birds made a previous inspection of the
lake; but it seemed that this was not the case. In the morning (at break of day) the geese,
hungry after their night’s rest, rise in separate flocks and fly off again to the field. As |]
was able to shoot every other day on the same small Jake, and the geese at each successive
shoot did not seem any more cautious than on the first occasion, I came to the conclusion
that the halts of 4. weglectus in the neighbourhood of Shungak-kul last less than two days.
_ “The departure of the flocks which have stopped for the day takes place, so far as 1
was able to judge, after the mid-day drink and after the night’s rest on the water; the flock
breaking up and flying, not to the field whence it arrived, but farther in the direction of its
migration. Bee | |
“Among the specimens of 4. neglectus obtained by myself, there is not а single
example in first autumn plumage; the moulting of the small feathers in all being not quite
complete. First to moult, it would seem, is the under-part of the body, next the head and
neck, last of all the scapulars. A specimen of 4. segetum in my collection from the Ufa
district was shot on Shungak-kul from a flock of 4. weglectus in a lucky right and left
which brought down four birds at once.
“T sent one of my bag of 4. ueglectus to the British Museum, and another to the
Zoological Museum of the St. Petersburg Academy of Science.” |

1 Г think this must have been due to some special causes, as geese of other species under normal circumstances do not pass the
night on open and deep water. hy ae

THE PINK-FOOTED GOOSE
МЕГАМОМУХ BRACHYVRHYNCHUS, BAILLON
Plate 8

English—Pink-footed Goose; Grey Goose; Blacknebs (Scotland) ; Pink-footed Bean-Goose
| (Cordeaux).

Russian—Korotkoklyuvy gus; korotkoklyuvy and korotkonosy gumennik (book names).

German—Kureschndbelige Gans; Rosenfussige Gans.

French—QOve @ bec court.

Danish—De Kleine Rietgans.

Swedish—Stetzbergens-Sddgas.

Anser brachyrhynchus, Baillon, Mém. Soc. В. d’Abbev., 1833, р. 74; Dresser, Birds of Europi, vi. р. 369, pl. 413
(1878); Degl. and Gerbe, Orn. Eur. 2, р. 482; Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus. xxvii. p. 103 (1895);
Menzbier, Pt. Ross., i. р. 746 (1895); zd, Okhotn. i Prom. Pt. Ross. i Kavk., р. 476, pl. 136; Buturlin,
Tabl. opredel. plastinchatokl., Tula, 1900 (“ Psov. i Ruzh. Okh.”) ; 24., Ро severu Rossii (Zhitkov i Buturlin),
1901, р. 84; Palmén, Cab. Journ. f. Orn. xxiv. р. 53 (1876); Buturlin, Sinopt. tabl. ОКБ. Pt. Ros.
Imp., p. 43 (1901).

? Middendorff, К. Sib., p. 227 (St. Petersburg !).
? Menzbier, Ptitsy Rossii, i. р. 746 (1895 )—-(Russia),
Id., Okhotn. i Promysl. Pt. R. i K,, И. р. 476, pl. 136—(Russia).
? Hume and Marshall, Game Birds of India, iii. p. 71, with pl. (1880).
? Pleske, V6g. Kola Hl1bns.; 24., Kritichesk. Obz. mlek. i ptits Kolsk. pol-va, 1887, рр. 341-342.
? Semenov, “ Priroda i Okhota,” 1898, vii. p. 13 (Ryazan gov.) (notes).
? Somov, Orn. Е. Khark. ©., р. 445 (1895).
? Deryugin, Orn. izsl. Psk. >. separat., р. 27 (nomen nudum),
? Kholodkovsky i Silantiev, Pt. Yevr., р. 523—(Russia).

? Anser brachyrhynchus, Semenov, “ Prir. i Okh.,” 1898, vii. р. 13.

Anser 67601705715, Thienem., Fortpfl. 4. Убе. Eur., pt. 5, р. 28 (1838).

Anser segetum, Strickland, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., iii. p. 122, pl. iv., figs. 2 and 3 (1859).

Anser phenicopus, Bartlett, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1839, р. 3.

Anser segetum, var. brachyrhynchus, Bonaparte, Compt.-Rend., xliii. p. 648 (1886).

Anser ferus, Evans and Sturge, Ibis, 1859—(Spitzbergen).

Anser cinereus, Thorell, Philos. Mag. Med. Kand., р. бт (1859).

Anser segetum, var. brachyrhynchus, Malmgren, Oef. К. Vet. АК. Forh., р. 189 (1863).

Melanonyx brachyrhynchus, Buturlin, Dikie Gusi В. I. (“ Psov. i Ruzh. ОКВ.” 1901); 24., separat., р. 26 ed seg.

? Anser rufescens, Palmén (nec Brehm), Finl. Fogl., ii. р. 339 (1872) (neglectus, Sushkin ?).

ADULT MALE

Whole head and neck brown with chocolate or coffee tinge, and often with a small
number of white plumules at base of bill. Upper part of back, between scapulz, brown with
rufous tinge. Lower part of back and scapulars light brown, the feathers becoming towards

87

38 Geese of Europe and Asia

tips rufous and edged with light rufous or light grey. Rump slate-brown; upper and lower
tail-coverts pure white. Tail blackish brown, with white edgings and tips to the feathers.
Upper wing-coverts slaty ashen grey, and edged (more or less widely) with light rufous.
Tips of median and greater wing-coverts very pale grey rufous. Outer primaries grey, with
black tips; inner primaries and secondaries uniformly brown-black, latter with narrow
whitish margins; tertiaries dark brown with wider whitish edgings. Whole breast
rufous brown, with pale edgings to feathers, producing a barred wavy effect. Flanks rufous
brown, each feather at tip passing gradually into rufous, and fringed with lighter, sometimes
greyish, margins.

Remaining part of under surface of body dingy white, upper part of belly with darker
grey transverse striping. Lower wing-coverts and axillaries dark grey. In the colouring of
the plumage, and in particular of the upper surface of the wing, this bean-goose thus shows
greater resemblance to the grey-lag than to its congeners,

The bill, from its shortness and in having only 20 or at most 22 teeth on each side
of the upper mandible,? approaches nearer, in shape and proportion of length of nail to
total length of culmen, to that of the typical bean-goose (М. segetum) than to that of any
of the others, as will be clearly seen from the annexed figures of the bills of the bean,
yellow-bill, and pink-footed geese.

М. brachyrhynchus, в М. segetum, & M. arvensis, &
Culmen 48 mm. Culmen 58 mm. Culmen 66 mm.
(Spitzbergen. ) (Ural.). (Novgorod. )

Colouring of bill black; but between the black nail of the upper mandible and the
front edge a rosy flesh-coloured band, embracing both mandibles, from which on upper
mandible extends backwards, under nares and along tomium, a wedge-shaped streak of the
same colour, sometimes reaching only to posterior margin of nasal apertures, but more rarely
right up to the gape. Personally, I have not seen a specimen of the latter type.

1 In an old Spitzbergen gander these edges are whitish grey, at a distance even seeming white; but this bird was obtained in July,
z.e, during the fading of the feathering before moulting.

2 [ had long finished this notice, when I received in January 1903 a letter from Mr. Frohawk, in which he enclosed me a drawing of
the bill of a goose of this species, obtained by Mr. Pike in Holland, and in which on one side of the upper mandible are 25, and on the
other 26 teeth. The bill, says Mr. Frohawk, is, as it were, thinner than in ordinary pink-footed geese. I must own that, judging from
Мг. Frohawk’s drawing, a doubt arises in my mind whether the goose belongs to this species. Unfortunately, not having seen it, I cannot
decide the question. .

Pink-footed Goose 89

Very important is the assertion of several eminent English ornithologists that, when
breeding in captivity, some of the offspring of this species have yellow (orange) bills
and legs, while others of the same brood show the normal rosy flesh-colouring of the
wild birds.

At present there are apparently no intergrading forms between such examples. Once it
is known that such occur, the question must naturally present itself: Are not pink-footed
geese met with in the wild state with yellow (orange) bills and feet? This question, so far
as I know, has been answered only by Sir В. Payne-Gallwey,! who states that he has killed
pink-footed geese with bills and feet of the same orange colour as in the bean-goose.? Hence
the legs and feet are of the same rosy flesh-colour as the bill. Claws black.

Accordingly, if there really occur in the wild state individuals with orange or yellow
bills and feet, then the specific characters of this goose must be sought in the size and form
of the bill, the ashy grey colouring of the wing-coverts, and the general dimensions of the
whole bird, which are considerably less than those of all the other representatives of the
eroup Melanonyx.

DIMENSIONS OF ADULT GANDER

Total length . ’ ; 650—708 mm. (= 25.5—27.8 in.).
Wing about . ; | до о-ва. (= 15.7. пы)
Culmen :; ; 44—48 mm. (= 1.73-1.88 in.).
Greatest visible depth of lower mandible laterally with

shut bill | Eo agi аи
Tarsus . 56 mm. (= 2.20 in.).

Number of teeth on each side of upper mandible, 20—22 (and, doubtful, 26).
Weight from 6% to 74 English Ibs.

I do not think that these dimensions include the extremes, but I had too few skins
to judge.

ADULT FEMALE

On the whole, only less in size than the male. In winter (Degland and Gerbe)
neck and upper part of body somewhat lighter, and bill always shorter than in male.
From the fact that all geese are subject to considerable variations in the colouring of
the plumage, I merely note the above statement by Messrs. Degland and Gerbe, not
regarding such lighter winter colouring as a constant feature. In spring, again, according
to the same authors, the edgings of the feathers in this goose become rufous, and the head
acquires a bluish tint; but I have excellent grounds for believing that such variations
in the colouring have no connection with the season of the year, but are purely individual,
perhaps dependent on food.

YOUNGER BIRDS

These differ from fully mature specimens mainly in the duller colouring of the
plumage and in the upper part of the body being browner than in the latter, while the wing-
coverts are far browner and not ashy grey. Bill almost black (in birds in first plumage),
with a very small amount of rose-red colouring on apical part. Feet, apparently, in first

1 Letters to Voung Shooters, 3rd Series, р. 69 (1896).
2 A doubt involuntarily arises, whether this distinguished sportsman did not take small specimens of the bean-goose for large
specimens of the pink-footed goose.
N

go Geese of Europe and Asia

plumage, dull greyish red. It is, however, desirable to have a more accurate picture of all]
the dresses of this goose than those possessed by the authors who have written on it and
have seen it alive.

YouNG IN Down

As regards the colouring of the young in down, we have two rather contradictory
descriptions.

Thus, according to Professor A. Newton, specimens from Spitzbergen “are clothed
in greenish yellow down, with patches of olive on the back of the head, lore, and region
of the eye, upper side of the wings, middle and lower part of the back, and the flanks:
but the ground-colour of one is much darker than the other. One (the darkest) specimen,
singularly enough, has on the outer edge of the middle toe, and on the outer interdigital
web of each foot, some two or three small yellowish feathers—a fact I cannot at all
explain.”

According, however, to Mr. Trevor-Battye, who became acquainted with this goose
in Spitzbergen, the young have no yellow but are covered with grey down.

As to the alleged occurrence of this goose in Russia, a doubt has been expressed,
and at the same time amply supported, by Mr. Buturlin in his interesting work Де сия
Rossitskot Imperit, wherein it is suggested that the statements of Мг. Е. О. Pleske and
Mr. N. N. Somov are insufficient to indicate that these authors had really to do with
this species, the colouring of the soft-parts of which are of the same rose flesh-colour as
in the pink-foot.

I go further, in my bibliography, and attach queries to a whole series of notices
supposed to refer to this goose. Not that I have any desire to deny the possibility of the
pink-footed goose visiting the more western part of Russia; on the contrary, I fully admit
such possibility, but until one case of such straying has been substantiated, I decline to
receive this species into the Russian fauna.

Since Dr. Sushkin discovered and described a goose with rosy bill and feet from
the Ufa Government, which occurred on passage in Hungary, wintering in Persia and
nesting in Novaia Zemlia,* there can hardly be any doubt that all the notices of а pink-
footed goose being met with in European Russia refer either to М. neglectus or to the
Novaia Zemlia bean-goose described by Heuglin, and later on by Mr. Buturlin, as
М. carnetrostris, if only this goose prove to be really a distinct species, and not some
hybrid, for example, of the yellow-bill or bean-goose with Sushkin’s goose, which, of
course, is perfectly possible from the statements given in the notice of that Novaia
Zemlia bean-goose. a)

Mr. М N. Somovs statement that, judging from a communication by Mr.
Chebyshev,” from the district in question, geese killed in the Starobelsk district of the
Kharkov Government “with light-rose bills and feet and mottled belly” probably belong
to the species dvachyrhynchus, is untrustworthy, since the weight given for them (8 to
10 Ibs.) absolutely refutes the assertion, to say nothing of the mottled belly — ап un-
doubted character of a goose of the genus duser. Light-rose bill and feet to match,
mottled belly, and weight 8 to то 15., to my mind, speak perfectly definitely in favour
of the common grey-lag (user anser).

1 And in all probability on Kolgueyv, as we shall see later on.
2 Okhotnichya Gazeta for 1889, No. тт, р. 133.

Pink-footed Goose =O

An examination of the other instances cited with a query has convinced me that not
one of them will bear criticism, and therefore I confidently affirm that hitherto there is
no record of an authentic case of the occurrence in Russia of the pink-footed goose. Here
I cannot refrain from mentioning a communication from Odessa inserted some years ago
in the 129, wherein a certain English sportsman stated that he saw somewhere near
Odessa many of these geese (pink-footed geese), although he did not get the chance of
killing one.

_ When I considered it necessary to give a detailed description and figure of this species
in my Guasz Rossi, I did so in order to give a true idea of the species and to avoid in the
future such doubtful identifications. If such slender knowledge of this goose on the part
of Russian sportsmen and ornithologists may find some excuse in the comparatively
scanty material available, no excuse for their ignorance can be offered by ornithologists
living in a country where this goose is one of the most numerous species in winter.

As an instance of my meaning, the late Mr. Seebohm fell into an error when he
wrote in his British Бара" that this goose can hardly be regarded otherwise than a local
race or island form of the bean-goose (4user segetum)\* Equally astonishing is the opinion
expressed by Mr. John Cordeaux in his British Birds, their Nests and F:ggs, that this
goose does not even deserve to be regarded as a sub-species of the bean-goose.

Most remarkable, however, is the fact that these two ornithologists should decide a
question of so much importance, when they were entirely unaware that, under the name of
bean-goose, they were confounding two perfectly distinct species of geese—the harvest
or common bean and the yellow-bill; and this because neither the one nor the other took the
trouble to enter more deeply into this question, which would have been easy enough, after
Naumann had discussed it so carefully.

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

It appears certain that this goose nests on Spitzbergen, and there is hardly a doubt
that it is found also in Franz Josef Land and very probably in Iceland, where, according
to the testimony of Mr. Proctor,’ it has been procured once or twice, the example being in one
case a female with an egg she is supposed to have laid. In Greenland the pink-footed
goose has not hitherto been found, neither has it been authentically regarded as breeding
anywhere on the European continent.

The species occurs on passage and winters every year in North-western Europe.
While in Scandinavia, North Germany, Holland, Belgium, and France it is merely a casual
and rare visitor, it winters regularly every year in large numbers in Great Britain, where
at the present day it is the common species among the bean-geese. It is very probable that
it sometimes also strays into the interior of the continent of Western Europe, and descends
along the Atlantic seaboard, although seldom, to Spain and Portugal; but all such records
demand careful verification. That the geese with rosy bills and feet now and then met
with in India in winter, belong not to this species but to Sushkin’s goose (7. ueglectus) is,
to my mind, an indisputable fact, since [ was convinced by Мг. №. A. Zarudny that it
was the latter that was found wintering in Persia, a skin from which country I have

carefully examined.

1 John Cordeaux in British Birds, their Nests and Eggs, erroneously cites Seebohm as stating that this is an zz/and form, instead of

island form, as stated by the latter. .
2 Vol. iil. р. 498. . 8 1035, 1864, р. 132.

92 Geese of Europe and Asia

No serious importance, it seems to me, should be attached to the statement of the
occurrence of this species in Japan. Of course, I should be more certain on these points
had I specimens from India and Japan for determination, but in view of the impossibility
of this, I am driven to be content for the present with mere inferences.

In regard to Spitzbergen, Mr. Trevor-Battye writes as follows: “The pink-footed

goose is distributed thinly, but generally, over a great part, at any rate, of Spitzbergen.
Its breeding habits do not differ, so far as my observation goes, from those of 4.
evrythropus or A. segetum. Like these birds, it seldom, on the mainland, nests by the
sea, but retires inland, and chooses for its nest some elevated point overlooking a stream
or lake. Occasionally it nests upon small islands, and a female bird, with its nest,
eggs, and the surrounding turf, now in the National Collection, was obtained by me
on a small island off Cape Boheman on Ice-Fjord on June 26, the three eggs being
slightly incubated. This was the only pair of geese upon this island. I shot the
female as she flew off the nest, and the male for some time displayed great solicitude,
swimming round and round and calling incessantly, but never came within shot... .
On July 24 two broods of young were running with their parents, near the Splendid
Glacier. Both these broods were in an advanced state of gvey—not yellow—down. .
I have elsewhere described the way in which a bean-goose will run along and then
squat with the neck stretched out along the ground exactly in the attitude assumed by
the thick-knee or Norfolk plover. The pink-footed geese of Spitzbergen behave in the
same way if they have their young with them.”

Mr. Trevor-Battye further adds that the nest is well guarded by the gander,
which at times quits its guard-post and begins to walk round and round the sitting
goose, along a path it has laid down, and meets an unbidden approach with a pro-
longed series of short, high notes, resembling those of the brent (Branta bernicla).

As to the eggs, according to the evidence of various authors, these have a rather
smooth shell with a slight gloss. In form they present fairly regular ovals, with one
end somewhat sharper than the other. In colour they are yellowish white, and their
dimensions vary in length from 3.10 to 3.40 in. (= 78.7-86.3 mm.), with a diameter of
2.15 in. (= 54.8 mm.).

These measurements are slightly exceeded by five eggs brought from Spitzbergen
by the Russian expedition, and now preserved in the Zoological Museum of the

St. Petersburg Academy of Science, as appears from the following table, drawn up by
Mr. С. Е. Gobel :—

Max. breadth 52.5 mm. (= 2.06 in.) with 80 mm. length (= 3.14 in.).

Max. breadth 52.5 mm. (= 2.06 in.) with 76 mm. length (= 2.99 in.).

Min. breadth 50 mm. (= 1.96 in.) with 84 mm. length (= 3.30 in.).

Max. length 84.5 mm. (= 3.32 in.) with 50 mm. breadth (= 1.96 in.).

Min. length 76 mm. (= 2.99 in.) with 52.5 mm. breadth (= 2.06 in.).

Weight 1050 cgrm. with 51.5 mm. breadth (= 2.06 in.) and 83.5 mm. length (= 3.28 in.).

Five specimens, mean breadth 51.5 mm. (= 2.02 in.); max. breadth 52.5 mm. (= 2.06 in.); min. breadth 50 mm.

ЕО
Five specimens, mean length 80.9 mm. (= 3.18 in.); max. length 84.5 mm. (= 3.32 in.); min. length 76 mm.
(= 2.96 i)

The note of this goose is described as similar to that of the other bean-geese, but
harsher and more piercing. In manner of life and habits this species also apparently

Pink-footed Goose 9 3

resembles the other bean-geese, and is fond of keeping with them and white-fronted
geese. For example, Sir R. Payne-Gallwey met the three species together, and even
shot them in company. The same author writes: “It is a common bird during autumn
and winter in parts of Great Britain, notably in the south-east of Scotland, in the Wolds
of Yorkshire, in Lincolnshire, near the coast of Norfolk, and in several other localities,
excepting the south of England. On the banks of the Severn and along the shores of
the Bristol Channel I have seen large numbers of these birds. In Ireland I have never
shot or heard of the pink-footed goose, and it has not been recorded therefrom.”

This goose, apparently, stands captivity well, and breeds freely under favourable
circumstances.

THE YELLOW-BILLED BEAN-GOOSE
MELANONVX ARVENSIS, BREHM
Plate 9

English—Bean-Goose; Log-Goose; Grey Goose (these names being used for both М. arvensis
and /М. segetum); Yellow-billed Bean-Goose (Е. W. Frohawk); ? Carr-lag (Е.
Coburn, if = faludosus, Strickland). |

Ки$1ап — Gus 2090; gumennik polevot; sery gus; laplandskit gumennik (Buturlin) ;
kustarny gus (Yaroslavl gov., Zeste Sabaneev, if it does not refer to the bean-goose) ;
pashenny gus (from confounding with М. segetum); khrushkot (Perm. gov., if not
М. segetum);, khrushkdya kazarka (Perm. gov., teste Sabaneev); gus and А gus
(Pomory, probably this species). |

Lappish—Czon (оп Imandra); Chudnya (East Finmark); Studva chudnya (Munioniska).

Finnish—/fanhi (gen. name of goose); MJetsd-hanhi (wood-goose) ; /sohanhi (great goose) ;
Komahanht.

German—A cker-Gans ; Freldganus; Feldsaatgans ; grosse Gaus; Buntschnabliche Saatgans ;
grosse Moorgans; grosse Zuggans; Buntschnabel; Rostgelbgraue Gans.

French—QOvze sauvage; oie des motssons; ote vulgaive (ces noms étant donnés aussi a
М. segetumy),

Anas fabalis ( partim), Latham, Gen. Syn., Suppl. 1. р. 297 (1787).

Anas segetum, Gmelin ( partem), Syst. Nat. 1. р. 512 (1788).

Anser arvensis, Brehm, Isis, 1830, $. 996; 24., Убе. Deutschl., s. 839 (1831); Naumann, Vogel Deutschl.,, xi.
р. 277, pl. 286 (1842); Fritsch, Vog. Eur., р. 407, pl. 45, fig. 4 (1870); Pleske, Th., Beitr. Kennt. Russ. R.,
2nd е4., 1х. р. 233 (1886); Pleske, Kr. obz. mlek. 1 pt. Kolsk pol. р. 337 (1887); Middend., Reis.
Sib., ii, pp. 226 and 227 ( partzm), 1851; Biichner, Pt. Spb. gub., р. 513 (1884); Biichner and Pleske,
Beitr. 2. Orn. S. Р. G, No. 176 (1881); Eversmann, Or. Кг. р. 554 (artim ?), 1868; Bogdanov, Pt.
i zv. Povolzhya, р. 147 (1871); Sabaneev, “Zhurn. Okh.,” 1874, р. 12; Menzbier, Pt. Ross. i. pp. 745
and 746 (1895); Buturlin, Dikie gusi Ross. Imp. (“Psov. i Ruzh. ОКБ.” 1901, Feb.-April); zd,
separ., рр. 34 and 46 (sub-g. Melanonyx) ; Somov, Orn. Е. Khark. g., р. 444 (1897); Kholodk. i Silant.,
Pt. Yevr., 1901, р. 522, pl. 42, Ё 3; Zarudny, Orn. Е. Zakasp. Кг., 1896, р. 437; Ruzski, Mater. iz.
pt. Kaz. gub., р. 117; Lorenz, Vogel Mosk. Gouv., р. 58 (1894); Radde, Ornis Cauc., р. 445 (partem), —
1884; Palmeén, Cab. J. f Orn. 1876, р. 53; Frohawk, “ The Field,” Oct. 4, 1902, р. 605 (with drawings
of bill); Ruzski, Tr. Obshch. Yest. pri Kaz. Un., xxv. No. 6, р. 117 (1893); Frohawk, “ Zoologist,”
1903, р. 41, pl. И.; Sorokin, “ Psov. i Ruzh. ОКБ.” Jan. 1903, р. 113, ес.

Anser sylvestris, Degl. and Gerbe, Orn. Eur. ii. р. 294 (1849) (partim); id, op. cit. ii. р. 481 (1867)
( partim).

Anser segetum, Bruch, Isis, 1828, р. 734, pl. ix. fig. 4; Khomyakov, Pt. Ryaz. ©. (Mater. К pozn. Faun. i Fi.
Ross. Imp., otd. zoolog.,, No. т (1900), pl. И. figs. 1, 2; 24. Берат. p. 34, ple т a25, ? Nikolski
( parttm ?), Рогу. zh. Kryma, р. 289 (1891); Radde, Ornis Cauc, р. 445 (partim), 1884; Sabaneev,
Ukaz. Kn. St. ОКВ. i Zool. Sod., рр. 455-458 (1883); Zarudny (fartim?), Orn. Е. Orenb. Кг. р. 223
(1888); Ruzski, Ptitsy Kazanskoi gub.; Midd., Reis. Sib. ii., рр. 225-227 (partim), 1851; Sushkin

94

Y ellow-billed Bean-Goose 95

(ра’ит), “This,” 1897, рр. 5-6; Brauner, Kratk. Opred. dichi stepn. pol. Rossii, pt. i, Ptitsy, р. 99
(1897); Coburn, “ Zoologist,” 1902, р. 441 pro parte, pl. iii.

Anser питта, Severtsov, Vert. Gor. raspr. Turk. Zh., рр. 70 and 149; zd, Cab. J. Е Orn., 1874, Diecast.

Anser segetum middendorfit, Khomyakov, Pt. Ryaz. gub., pp. 34 and 35, pl. ii. fig. 2 (nec fig. eo

Anser segetum, var. serrirostris (Swinhoe), Pleske, Rev. Turkest. Orn., Mém. Ac. Sc. St. Petersburg, xxxvi.
No. 3, р. 54.

Anser middendorffiz, Severtsov, Cab. J. f. Orn. 1875, р. 184; Buturlin (partim respectu Turkestani), Dikie Gusi
Ros. По." Psov. г Вия. ОК.” 1001) 4d; separ, р; 31 |

Anser segetum, var. arvensis, Buturlin, Tabl. opred. plastinchatokl. (“ Psov. i Ruzh. Okh.,” 1900); dd., separ., p. 8.

Anser segetum arvensis, Buturlin, Sinopt. tabl. Okhotn. Pt. р. 44 (1901).

Anser fabalis, Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus, xxvii. p. 99 (1895), partim (cum A. segetum); Oates, Man. Game
Birds of India, ii. p. 74 (1899).

Anser 57717051715, var. middendorffiz, Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus., xxvii. p. 102 (partim; resp. Turk.), 1895.

Anser leuconyx, Selys-Longchamps, Naumannia, 1856, p. 398.

? Anser paludosus, Strickland, Rep. Brit. Assoc. 1858, pp. 131, 132; Coburn, “ Zoologist,” 1902, р. 441, pl. iii.

NVote.—I am compelled to omit the rest of the Russian sporting literature which may concern this species, as I was obliged to
do in the case of М. segetum, being absolutely unable to make anything out of it, that is to say, to which of these two species authors’
statements refer. I shall discuss this question at greater detail in the paragraph on the geographical distribution of the present species.

ADULT MALE

Head and neck grey-brown with faint reddish, sometimes rusty or yellowish buff,
tint. Along whole of base of upper mandible more or less developed white feathering, in
very young birds and, more seldom, in very old individuals absent. Occasionally this
white feathering attains on forehead a breadth of 15 mm. (= 0.59 in.). White feathering
around base often interrupted by naked angles of bill, projecting into forehead laterally,
but variations in its breadth noticeable in different individuals, independently of sex
and age. |
Forehead, occiput, and nape somewhat darker than remaining parts of head; often,
but not always, a dark band stretches back in continuation of gape. Chin and throat
almost always coloured somewhat lighter than cheeks, and descending, this colouring,
gradually becoming lighter, passes on upper breast into yellowish white with grey spots
of indeterminate shape. Lower part of breast and belly greyish white. Flanks dark
brown, with whitish brown edgings to feathers, which as they approach wing become
lighter, and pass finally, at the wing itself, into almost pure white. Thighs light grey.
Lower part of neck behind and mantle grey-brown, with lighter greyish margins to
feathers ; back and scapulars dark brown, edgings to feathers at first greyish brown and at
tips whitish, forming a regular transverse light (whitish) wavy pattern on dark ground.
Similar light wavy but less marked undulations occur in 4 to 6 bars on wing-coverts,
which, with exception of a smaller dark ashy grey area lying nearer edge of wing, are
of same colour as scapulars. Rump brown-black; tail-coverts, both upper and lower,
and sides of crissum and whole of vent, white.

Tail-feathers 18 in number, very rarely 20, brownish grey-black with broad white
tips; median, with narrow whitish margins; on next tail-feathers (outwards) these margins
continually increase in breadth; under-side of tail-feathers white with greyish mottlings,
centre grey with minute white speckles.

Wing above brown, more greyish on bend, alule, and primary wing-coverts.
Primaries brown and greyish only basally, remaining flight-feathers dark brown. Under
wing-coverts and axillaries dark grey or soot colour, but glossy, smaller wing-coverts being
here lighter.

96 Geese of Europe and Asia

ADULT FEMALE

_Оп the whole somewhat inferior to male in size and weight, and colouring of soft-
parts somewhat paler than in the latter. I could discern no difference in the plumage.

Younc Brrps (SECOND AND THIRD YEAR)

General colouring darker than in adults, with duller rufous brown edgings to feathers
and more marked rufous tinge on neck. Bill with very limited extent of yellow-orange
colouring, concentrated between nail of upper mandible and anterior edge of nasal depression.
Here yellow (or yellow-orange) encircles both mandibles, as seen in adult bean-geese
(М. segetum). From this feature such young birds have been taken for examples of the
latter species.

In all birds of this age I have examined, from the above-mentioned light ring on the
upper mandible there extends posteriorly, under the nares, to a greater or less distance,
a wedge-shaped projection or space, which sometimes stretches along the edge itself of
the bill.

Inner surface of upper mandible almost entirely black. Legs and feet yellow with
blackish or dingy grey webs, and blackish claws.

YOUNG BrrRDS IN FIRST PLUMAGE

Still less yellow on bill, head and neck more rufous, and feet dingy yellow. Feathers
of under surface of body far narrower than in individuals already moulted. White plumules
scarcely ever occur at base of bill. |

Of the young in down I have no knowledge.

DIMENSIONS ок ApuULT Birps oF Вотн SEXES

Total length, 730-900 mm. (= 28.70—35.40 in.), and only in biggest Turkestan example 905 mm.
(баш).

Expanse, up to 1620 mm. (= 64 in.), usually somewhat less.

Wing, 410—490 mm. (= 16.10—19.20 in.), rarely 500 mm. (= 19.60 in.).

Culmen, © 65 to 67 mm. (= 2.16—2.63 in.), 6 56 to 71.5 mm. (= 2.20—2.81 in.), and only in one
case known to me 72 mm. (= 2.83 in.)}—in the Turkestan $ of Severtsov’s collection.

Greatest depth of lower mandible, seen from without, with shut bill, 7 to 8% mm. (= 0.27—0.33 in.).

Breadth of bill opposite middle of nasal apertures, 20-224 mm. (= 0.78—0.88 in.).

Depth of bill (of both mandibles), opposite middle of nasal apertures, 24—26 mm. (= 0.94—1.02 in.).

Depth of bill at base of both mandibles, 30—33 mm. ( = 1.18—1.29 in.), and in one case only, 34 mm.
(= 1.33 in.)—in the largest Turkestan specimen of Severtsov’s collection. |

Tarsus, about 66-73 mm. (= 2.59—2.87 in.).

Number of teeth on each side of upper mandible, 24—28, and only in one known case 23, but
unfortunately I have not myself verified this.

Weight, from 74 to 11 Russian lbs.

Note.—Length of middle digit without claw almost equal to length of tarsus, but in dry specimens this is not easy to measure.
I have also convinced myself that, no constant relation exists between the tarsi and the length of the middle toes in any geese, and that
individual variations in this respect are very considerable.

Considering that two or three points are quite sufficient to distinguish the present
goose from its East Siberian representative (М. arvensis sibiricus), 1 give a table of the
measurements of a few examples of those I have examined, with the localities where they
were obtained.

Yellow-billed Bean-Goose > 97

Depth of lower | Niner cE
| Sex. Culmen, ee ee | on aS aie
| with bill shut. рН
mm. in. Wie its
? 594 = 2.34 о 24 Moscow, Prof. M. A. Menzbier’s coll.
? 50: = 2.32 7 =0.27 26 у
ф 66 =2.59 7k =0.29 25
2 = о? 24
© бе ОР os Ryazan, collected by Khomyakov, who took some of the specimens
3 BA = 2.92 ie О, 25 for М. middendorffit, Sev.
3 FO =o, 75 я оо: 28
3 OF) 220 ово 25
<) 64 =2.51 ?
6) 65 = 255 ? ? Chinaz, Severtsov’s coll., Zool. Mus. Ac. Sci., St. Petersburg.
ie 68 =2.67 2 24 Fergan district, Severtsov’s coll., Zool. Mus. Ac. Sci., St. Petersburg.
5 62 = 244 ? ? Thian-Shan (West), Severtsov’s coll., Zool. Mus. Ac. Sci., St. Petersburg.
= 62 = 2.44 ? ? Chimkent, i “3
$ 62 =2.44 | 7 =0.27 ? } > :
9 67 =2.63 | 8}=0.33 ? . és
3 бт =2.40 ре ? Chinaz, cS а
3 64 =2.51 ? ? Fergan district, 4 ki
$ 7 7 =0.27 р | 5B) 2) =
3 2 ars 84 = 0.33 26 Chimkent, Severtsov’s coll., Zool. Mus. Ac. Sci., St. Petersburg—
biggest example of Severtsov’s coll., and probably original of his
М. middendorffit.
2d 20: = 2,75 ? 24 Chimkent, Severtsov’s coll., Zool. Mus. Ac. Sci., St. Petersburg.
3 60 = 2.56 р 2 Kharkov government, М. М. Somov’s coll., Zool. Mus. Ac. 5с1., St.
Petersburg.
3 63 = 2.48 ? ? 5 ” %
3 66 = 2.59 о 26 Petersburg gov., from А. Р. Semenov (my coll.).
3 65 = 2.55 Ро: 25 Belgium (my own coll.). 3
& чу. Ор 2.91 6 = 6,28 24 Obdorsk, K. M. Deryugin, coll. Zool. Mus. Ac. Sci., St. Petersburg.
| в ad. би = 2404 i 0.24 28 Zvenigorodsk district (Mosc. gov.), Lorenz, Zool. Mus. Ac. Sci., St.
| Petersburg.
2 62 =2.44 ое 25 Tomsk, Мау 15, 1902, from Prof. Kashchenko ; much yellow on bill.
2 59 = 2.28 Pie 0,20 -_| 25 , ‚> ‚ >
? Р-Я On =) 31 26 is с 15 3
| juv.? 60. = 2,30 т | 25 > , 7 a
ad.? 40 = 2.75 о 28 | т 2 (bill passing to сих type; no white
| feathers basally).
? 67 = 2.63 8h=0.33 = 28 О ms (arvensis type).
? 67 =2.63 81 = 0.33 26 . . many yellow spots all over bill.
juv. ? eee ог 27 В 5 typical youngster.
juv. ? 594 = 2.34 Y= 0:5.) a a г 5
2 7k = 2.81 L 26 : ; ; ,
| ower Of 11 birds of this species, brought in 1902 by S. A. Buturlin from
68> = 2.67 27 : ;
т: mandible SF N ovaia Zemlia (Malyya Karmakuly), in all yellow colour on
"99 | wanting bill prevails over black.
02 2-51 Da

If we compare this table with the one in the notice of MZ. arvensis sibtricus, we
shall see that there is no possibility of identifying either the Ryazan or the Turkestan
М. arvensis with the East Siberian М. arvensis sebtvicus.

I must, however, now point out, in regard to the bill, the chief distinctions existing
between these two geese. To begin with, I have to dwell in some detail on the description
of the bill of М. arvensis, which affords characteristics sufficient to discriminate with
absolute certainty between this species and the bean-goose (JZ. segefum). Before doing so,
I ask the reader to note that in this description I have exclusively in view the bills of adult
birds. The bill of the yellow-billed goose is considerably more elongated than in М. segetum,
from which it also differs in form. It is also longer and comparatively broader at the point,
and far more depressed behind the nail of the upper mandible. At the same time the lower
mandible in 17. avvensis is less curved and comparatively less deep in the thickest part

(looking at the shut bill from the side) than in 4/7. segetum. ‘The nail is considerably
о

98 Geese of Europe and Asia

shorter, but at the same time also broader and more rounded both longitudinally and
transversely. This difference in the form of the bill and nail is clearly shown in Plate 23 of
the present work. In addition, I give figures of the bills, taken from above, of both
M. arvensis and M. segetum, by comparison of which the essential difference in the size of
the upper nail will be very apparent. |

We may first of all notice that, as shown by the dotted lines across these figures, in
M. arvensis the length of the nail is included in the total length of the bill usually
considerably more than 4 times, or, far less frequently, 4 times, while in AZ. segetum the nail is
included in the total length of the bill considerably less than 4 times, or not more than 31
times, so far as I can judge from the examples of the latter species I have had in my hands.

с
\
, i
ANS \ | й й |

NSIT АМИ
\\ "OM И As `

А DY «| Я
\ у
4.

М. segetum, & М. arvensis, С М. arvensis, Ф
Culmen 601 mm. Culmen 66 mm. Culmen 70 mm.
(Northern Russia. ) (St. Petersburg.) (Ryazan. )

These differences in the structure and form of the bills of the yellow-billed and the
bean- goose were long since clearly and intelligibly described, as well as figured (although
the figures were, in my opinion, inaccurate), by Mr. Naumann,! but unfortunately attracted
scant attention among ornithologists, who concluded that as a guide to the discrimination
of these two species it sufficed to confine themselves to the distribution of the black and
orange areas on the bills, in consequence of which, as we shall see farther on, they could not
avoid coming to the erroneous deduction (not having understood the gist of what Naumann
had told them) that these two geese constitute but one species with a bill very unstable both
in shape and colouring.

To return to the bill of М. avvensis, we find behind the nail, towards the nares, that
it is very flat above, but farther towards the base becomes отаЧиаПу stouter, and is fairly
high and wide at the forehead. The feathering of the forehead extends on to the base of
the bill in a fairly regular flat arch. The feathering at the sides of the upper mandible
also projects into this in regular semicircles, whence it results that the naked angles
of the bill, projecting into the feathering at the sides of the forehead, are considerably
farther removed from the tip of the nail than is the extreme point of the feathering in the
upper angle of the gape. |

1 Naumannia, 1853, taf. Tit

Y ellow-billed Bean-Goose 99

The nasal depressions in the yellow-billed goose are in the form of a very elongated
oval. ‘The oblong nasal aperture lies in the foremost end of the nasal depression, reaching
with its anterior edge almost to the middle of the Ъ11.' The nares are pervious, but only
in their rounded posterior portion. The greatest depth of the part of the lower mandible
visible laterally with shut bill very seldom exceeds 8 mm. (=1.31 in.), and only in one
Turkestan example with culmen 72 mm. (= 2.83 in.) does it attain 84 mm. (=0.33 in.).

The number of teeth on each side of the upper mandible varies usually between 25
and 28, but in rarer cases there are 24, and from information I have received in one
individual there were only 23.

At first I attached great importance to the number of teeth for the determination of
species, but have now been obliged to change my view on this character, as specimens
received in 1902 by Mr. Buturlin from Novaia Zemlia and Kolguev, as also others kindly
examined for me by Mr. Frohawk, clearly showed that the number of teeth is not always
а trustworthy character. Indeed, in the majority of specimens of М. segetum examined by
myself there were only 20 to 21 teeth, but I have now in my hands bean-geese from
Kolguev with 24 and 25 teeth. It seems therefore that, in some geese, the number
of teeth slightly increases with age, or, more exactly, certain teeth in younger birds are very
feebly developed, and only with maturity attain their full size and become conspicuous.

Injuries to the bill are far from rare in geese, and probably mostly occur in early
youth. As a rule, on finding in skins that the bill has been injured, one may confidently
conclude that the number of teeth will be abnormal.

In М. arvensis (as in other representatives of the genus) along the edges of the lower
mandible are 9 or 10 more teeth than in the upper, so that if, for example, there are 26 teeth
on each side of the upper mandible, one may almost certainly say that in the lower there
will be from 35 to 36. The comparative depth of the lower mandible greatly simplifies the
distinction of the yellow-bill from the bean-goose at any age, and that, too, alike in fresh-
shot individuals or dry skins.

Turning to the colouring of the bill and noting the most essential points relating to
М. arvensis, we find that in perfectly adult birds of both sexes the bill is almost wholly
yellow-orange ; and only occasionally is this colouring replaced in the basal half of the bill by
a light rosy flesh-tint, which can be seen only in fresh-killed birds. In dry skins all the
light parts of the bill are wholly yellow, orange, or reddish orange.

The nails of both mandibles, as in all the representatives of the genus Melanonyx,
are wholly black and glossy, and the teeth for the most part of a dark colour, and not
whitish, as in the species of the genus 4mzser. Again, the black colouring on the culmen
itself, between the nares, extending anteriorly approximately to the line uniting the fore-
edges of the nares, rarely reaches farther towards the apex. This black colouring on
the culmen sometimes reaches to the feathering of the forehead, but more often falls short
by a few millimetres. Ordinarily there is a black stripe on the sides of the base of the upper
mandible, either in contact with the feathering of the head or slightly removed from and
parallel to the same.

In very old birds, in which the white feathering at the base of the upper mandible is
already absent, sometimes the whole upper mandible, with the exception of the black nail

т Г note here by the way that in Khomyakov’s representation of the bills of geese in his Риду Ryazanskot gub., pl. ii. ff. 1 and 3, the
nasal apertures are brought too near to the apex of the bill, which is not the case in the originals, as I convinced myself when examining
them.

ТОО Geese of Europe and Asia

and a patch on the culmen, is entirely yellow-orange, only the rami of the lower mandible
being more or less black, as is also the nail. Sometimes, however, the black stretches along
the basal half of the edge of the upper mandible, and sometimes black patches of indefinite
shape are scattered here and there over the yellow-orange ground of the bill. The basal half
(or somewhat more) of the rami of the lower mandible is also at times black, but between
this black and the nail the lower mandible is invariably yellow-orange, this latter colour
intersecting also the apical part of the naked skin of the chin. In proportion as the length
of the bill increases, so far as I have been able to ascertain from the material at my disposal,
the black more and more dislodges the yellow from the base of the bill; and once the bill
attains а culmen-length of 70 mm. (=2.75 in.), it is safe to say that the whole base will be
entirely black; thus to a certain extent indicating the transition to the East Siberian
М. arvensis sibiricus. ‘This, in its general features, is the arrangement of the yellow-orange
and black colouring on the bill of AZ. arvenszs.

I may now direct the special attention of the reader to the fact that in young birds of
typical IZ. arvensis the yellow-orange colouring never has such a great extension as in old
birds, and that often in birds of the second and third years (according to my estimate) the
greater part of the bill is wholly black; so that only a broad ring in the apical part of the
bill and a wedge-shaped space passing from it backwards under the nares resemble the
pattern on the bill of the bean-goose. It is, then, such immature specimens of the yellow-
billed goose that have evidently been taken by various authors for М. segetum, thus giving
rise to that confusion in the literature it is so difficult or even impossible to put right.

It must also be borne in mind that in some individuals the yellow-orange colour is
scattered over the black ground of the basal portion of the bill in irregular sharply defined
patches. Such examples I hold to be transitional to the fully adult, and they should eventu-
ally assume the colouring of typical specimens, which I have described above, and have
figured in Plate 23 of the present work.

After death the orange colour often takes a deep red tinge, which must be ascribed
to subcutaneous extravasation or infiltration of blood. In living birds, however, the depth
of the yellow or yellow-orange colouring is, apparently, subject to considerable variation,
directly dependent, I think, on the quality of the food taken by the bird, and its condition, as
I have also stated in the notice of the genus „идей. |

The bare parts of the eyelids in this species are reddish grey; the legs yellow-orange,
with lighter webs in full adults and greyish dull yellow webs in young birds; claws black,
but occasionally also whitish. It was evidently examples of the latter type which were
described by Baron Sélys de Longchamps? as MZ. arvensis, var. leuconyx ; but the author him-
self afterwards acknowledged this form to be merely an accidental aberration from the type.
Occasionally it happens that only the outer toe has a whitish claw, while the rest are black.

The iris is dark brown.

(GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

In spite of the confusion between this goose and the bean-goose, we are somewhat
better acquainted with its range than with that of the latter. The present species is
evidently, on the whole, far more numerous than the bean-goose, and the region of its
nidification is larger both in longitude and latitude. This goose breeds from 64° №. lat.
upwards in the Scandinavian peninsula and in that of Kola, as well as in the greater part

1 Naumannia, 1856, $. 394.

Yellow-billed Bean-Goose ТОТ

of Archangel and the Olonets Government, and in particular in the northern portion of Lake
Onega, although it is still impossible to indicate its range there in detail. It nests оп Kolguev
and in Novaia Zemlia, and probably throughout the Pechora district ; in Finland its breeding-
grounds descend to 62° №. lat. It is the only goose of the Me/anonyx group which I have
observed during five years in its autumn passage on the lakes of the southern part of the
Vyborg Government, where I have never noticed the bean-goose. In small separate parties,
or even pairs, it breeds in certain localities on the Baltic coast; it doubtless occurs in
suitable spots of the Northern Transural, still so little explored; and it certainly nests on
the lower waters of the Obi, and in the Taimyr district.

From this it follows that, alike in the West and in the East the breeding range of this
species considerably exceeds that of the bean-goose. From the Taimyr peninsula, through the
Tomsk Government and the Western Thian-Shan, it descends to winter in Russian Turkestan,
but hardly ever strays into Transcaspian territory. On passage it is probably extremely
common in the Tomsk Government, whence, through the kindness of Professor N. F.
Kashchenko, I obtained nine heads of specimens taken in the neighbourhood of the city
of Tomsk on May 15, 1902, all of which proved to belong to the typical yellow-billed goose.
Hence it is quite possible that the “black” geese which, according to a communication of
Mr. Yablonsky,’ nest in the taiga (so-called ‘‘chern” or black wood), near Barnaul, and which
I doubtfully assigned to Melanonyx segetum serrirostris, partly belong to yellow-billed
М. arvensis as affirmed by the author in question. It happened, however, that the specimens
of M. arvensis sent by Professor Kashchenko from Tomsk came into my hands much later
than those of /М. segetum serrirostris sent from Barnaul by the same donor, and that I had
consequently completed the article on the former before I received the latter. Personally I
think that, in the Tomsk Government and locally in that of Irkutsk, both species may breed,
and that both are probably known Бу the same name—gus chernevot.

Probably М. arvensis, as distinct from М. segetum, winters in some parts of Trans-
caucasia, as, for example, in the valley of the Kura; but it seems not to occur at all in
_ winter on the shores of the Caspian, the fauna of which is, however, still imperfectly known.
On the other hand, in the Crimea it winters on the Sivash, and doubtless on other
shores of the Black Sea,—even worse known zoologically than the Caspian. It also winters
throughout the northern part of the Mediterranean basin. From Egypt it is, however,
completely absent. In Western Europe this goose is almost everywhere abundant as a
migrant, wintering in the more temperate districts, such as Spain, where, however, its
numbers are incomparably less than those of the grey-lag or the white-fronted goose.
Considerable numbers pass the winter in Great Britain, where the species is usually not
recognised by either sportsmen or ornithologists as distinct from the bean-goose. Owing to
the kind assistance of Mr. Frohawk, I am, however, now able to state that the great majority
of geese wintering in Great Britain, and known as bean-geese, belong to this species and
not to 7. segetum.

Without having seen specimens from those places, it is impossible to say to what
species belong the bean-geese sometimes met with on the island of Madeira and in
Iceland, but, for certain reasons, I think they will prove to be yellow-bills. That the number
of the two species of bean-geese wintering in Great Britain is continually diminishing, owing
to the increase of the pink-foot (М. dvachyrhynchus), seems evident from the literature оп

1 As it was evidently met with there by Middendorff.
2 Priroda г Okhota, 1902.

102 Geese of Europe and Asia

the subject. This is explained by English ornithologists as due to the contraction of the
range of the former species, in consequence of the ever-increasing area under cultivation. It
is probable, indeed, that at the beginning of the nineteenth century the yellow-bill bred in
Great Britain, and that it was then distinguished locally, under the name of the carr-lag,
from the grey-lag. It was on this ground that Mr. Strickland described it under the name
of Auser paludosus ; and if the 4. paludosus figured by Mr. Coburn in the Zoologist of 1902
really represents the bird which Mr. Strickland described under that name, there is not the
least doubt that this is the same as Me/anonyx arvensis of Brehm.

On migration the yellow-billed goose occurs, and always in considerable numbers,
over the whole of the continent of Western Europe, where it is everywhere more abundant
than M. segetum. Nhether or not this goose strays in winter into Eastern Persia and
Northern India remains at present a moot question. It must, however, be borne in mind
that although there is nothing improbable in the bird occasionally visiting India, yet it
certainly does not regularly winter there. On the other hand, a more probable explanation
is that in India specimens of М. xeglectus have been taken for this goose.

In the notice on the bean-goose I have already expressed my opinion as to the
erroneous determination of the countless flocks recorded from the Volga and Kama. I think,
indeed, that the majority of the migrants there will prove to belong to the yellow-billed
species, and that the colouring of the bill of young individuals, so nearly resembling that of
M. segetum, will be found to be the chief cause of the confusion.

If the yellow-billed species occurs on migration almost everywhere in European Russia
and Western Europe, this by no means proves that it halts everywhere on its way. It
hardly, for example, alights at all in those parts of the Azov district where for many years in
succession I observed vast flights of grey-lags, and of greater and lesser white-fronted geese.
_ А statement by Mr. Е. К. Lorenz to the effect that in the Moscow Government the yellow-
billed species is an ordinary migrant, while the bean-goose is rare, indicates that this
ornithologist is one of the few who distinguish between these geese. The countless gaggles
observed on passage (especially during the spring migration, when large numbers are taken)
on Lake Ilmen belong almost wholly to the yellow-billed goose; and the same may be said
with regard to the flocks visiting the Ryazan Government and the whole of Turkestan.

Personally, it is matter for regret that neither Mr. Seebohm, Mr. Trevor-Battye, nor
other explorers of the bird-fauna of the North were able to distinguish between these two
geese. Had they done so, they might have thrown much light on the question of their
geographical distribution, while, as it is, their observations and labours are almost valueless
in this respect. It may be added that in the summer of 1902 Mr. Buturlin, during a visit
to Kolguev, obtained a few examples of this goose, which nests there in company with
Melanonyx segetum.

In concluding the subject of geographical distribution, I may remark that I am
absolutely unable to give even approximately exact details, owing to the fact of this species
having been confounded with the bean-goose.

As regards its nidification, Mr. G. F. Gobel has given me the following information.
М. arvensis,’ he writes, “builds its nest in Lapland, according to Liltenstjern, for the
most part in marshes among woods. This it constructs of various dry vegetable substances,
or selects a large tussock of grass.!_ A fine clutch consists of six eggs.?. Information to this

1 On the top of such a tussock the goose makes a simple depression, and lines it with dry plants and a small quantity of down.
2 Probably sometimes more.

Y ellow-billed Bean-Goose ro

effect was given me by Notozero Laps, and by the forester Kormilov at Povenets, on the
northern extremity of Lake Onega, who in 1879 had a yearling female hatched from the
egg bya hen. This goose, which was remarkably tame, associated with a common drake;
and on seeing the latter would at once run after and follow him about like a dog through the
yard, and in the street.

“Г saw two equally tame geese brought in the summer by Mr. №. A. Smirnov from
Novaia Zemlia, and living on an enclosed grass-plot near the station on Catherine Island.’

_ “ М. arvensis is very easily tamed, and might become perfectly domesticated and

replace 4user anser domesticus in the North, especially as the latter breeds badly there.”

In regard to the eggs, I give a table of measurements and weights drawn up by
Mr. Gobel, based on 24 specimens from Lapland (Lake Cholme and River Paza).

Max. breadth 59 mm. (= 2.32 in.), with 84 mm. (= 3.30 in.) length, and 1320 cgrm. weight.

Min. PB) 54 ” (Ga 2.12 sp) р ” 75 >) = 2.97 > ‚ ” >) 1092 ” ”
ая Е аа, Gone ri. Sean ee сы а, о. .
Min. > 74 9) ( = 2.91 >> ) у 54 >) ( = 2.1 2 >) ) > bb) 1092 >) >)
Max. weight 1338 cgrm., with 58 mm. ( = 2.28 in.) breadth, and 84 mm. (= 3.30 in.) length.
Min. 9 1074 ” ” 56 >> ( ги 2.20 ” ) ” +) 78 ” = 3.07 ” ) ”

24 eggs: mean breadth 56.2 mm. ( = 2.21 in.); max. breadth 59 mm. (= 2.32 in.); min. breadth 54 mm. (= 2.12 in.).

24 5, wi TOMBE 81.0" о о
Bales: 3 » weight 1254 cgerm.; „. weight 1338 cgrm.; , weight 1074 cgrm.

As regards the colouring and structure of the shell, reference may be made to the notes
on eggs in the Appendix.

1 The geese brought by Smirnov, here spoken of by Mr. Gobel, according to the skin of one of them, now in the Zoological Museum
of the Imperial Academy of Science at St. Petersburg, belonged to (М. segetum.

MIDDENDORFF’S GOOSE
МЕГАМОМУХ ARVENSIS SIBIRICUS, ALPHERAKY
Plate то

English—/iddendorff’s Goose (Sclater). |

Russian—BSolshot gumennik (Yakutsk, feste Maak); zheltogolovy gus and zheltogolovy
sumennik;, lesnot gumennitk (on Boganida, {ее Middendorff); ryshegolovy
gsumennik and vostochno-stbirski gumenntk (Buturlin).

Mongol—Shara-khusdr-kholon (Transbaikalia, Kirilov).

Buryat—Shara-khazyir-galin (valley of Irkut—zheltogolovy gus).

Yakut—Kalkhalkh (Schrenck).

Kamchadal—Gzé (label on specimen brought by Voznesensky).

Сегтап—.5202715сйе Acker-Gans.

Anser grandts, Middendorff (пес Pallas), Bull. Phys. Math. Ac. Sc. St.-Pétersburg, 11. No. то, р. 298 (1844); zd,
Sib. Reis., ii. р. 225, pl. xx. fig. 1, 1851; Schrenck, Reis. Amur-L., 1. р. 462 (1860); Radde, Reis. 5.0.
Sib., ii. р. 354 (1863); Elwes, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1873, р. 649; Taczanowski, J. f. Orn., 1873,
р. 108—1874, р. 336—1875, р. 256; Maak, Putesh. Amur, Prib, р. 143 (1859); Kirilov, Okhota i
Okh. Khozyaistvo у Zabaikalye (“ Prir. i ОКВ.” 1902, iii.). |

Anser middendorffti, Severtsov (partim resp. Sib. or.), Vert. i Goriz. raspr. Turk. Zh. рр. 70 and 149 (1873);
Dresser, Ibis, 1876, р. 416; Oates, Man. Game Birds of India, и. р. 76 (1899); Buturlin, Dikie Сия
Ross. Imp. (“ Psov. i Ruzh. ОКБ.” Feb.-April 1901); 24., separ., р. 31 (1901).

Anser middendorffit, Menzbier, Put. d’ra Slyunina, “Okhotsko-Kamch. Krai,” р. 346 (1900).

Anser segetum middendorffii, Buturlin, Sinopt. tabl. Pt. Ross. Imp. р. 44 (1901); Khomyakov, Ptitsy Ryaz. gub.
(partim) у Mater. dlya pozn. Faun. i Fl. Ross. Imp., Otd. zool., pt. 5, р. 34, pl. ii. fig. 3 (Yakutsk).

Anser segetum, var. serrtrostris, Taczanowski (пес Swinhoe), J. Е Orn., 1874, р. 333.

Anser segetuim, Swinhoe (partim), Ibis, 1875, р. 456.

Anser segetum serrirostris (partim), Seebohm, Hist. Brit. Birds, iii. р. 494 (1885); zd., Birds of Jap. Emp., р. 236
( parti), 1890.

Anser segetum middendorffii, Nikolsky, Ostr. Sakh. i yego Е. Pozv., р. 224 (1889); Taczanowski (partem),
Faune Orn. Sib. Or, р. 1098 (1893); Dybowski, J. Е Orn, 1868, р. 338—1873, р. 108—1874,
р. 336—1875, р. 256; Pleske, Ornith. Ausb. Exp. Gebriid. Gr.-Grzym. Centr. As., St.-Petersb., 1892,
р; 290.

Anser serrivostris middendorffit, Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus., xxvii. p. 102 (1895).

? Gus, Yablonsky, Zhurn. “ Prir. i Okh.,” 1891, vii. (ОКВ. у Min. uyezde Yenis. gub., р. 58) (ее ити servirvostris ? ).

My notice may commence with a statement of the grounds which induced me to give
a new name to this goose, known since the appearance of Severtsov’s work (Verteh. 7
Gorizont. raspr. Turkest. Zhiv, 1873) under the name of user middendorffii. In the
notice of the yellow-billed goose I have included Severtsov’s name of 4. middendorffi among
the synonyms of the latter, and my reasons for so doing may now be given. |

Severtsov made several mistakes in describing Anser middendorffi from Turkestan
104

Middendorfft’s Goose 105

specimens, mainly because he generally confounded the species 17. arvensis and М. segetum.
Another error is the statement that the Turkestan 4. middendorffii was identical with those
East Siberian geese which Middendorff, Schrenck, and Radde regarded as Auas grands
of Pallas.

Attention may also be directed to the author’s inaccurate measurements of the bills of
Turkestan birds, namely, from 1.9 to 2 in. (=48.2-51 mm.), that is to say, dimensions so
small that they are not met with even in the smallest of the adult examples of the European
representatives of AZ. arvensis. Finally, the most serious misstatement of Severtsov's 15
that East Siberian geese (4. grandis, Midd. иес Pall.) winter in Turkestan.

All this at first completely threw me out, and it would hardly even now have been
possible to clear up the muddle, were not Severtsov’s collection of geese preserved in the
Zoological Museum of the Academy of Science at St. Petersburg. From a detailed
examination of this material all became clear, although not without some labour.

Not a single example of ЛИ. segetuwm from Turkestan is to be found in this collection ;
while the dimensions of the bills do not tally with those given by Severtsov. Moreover, not
a single specimen from Turkestan is identical with those from East Siberia; while only the
largest male from Chimkent, with a culmen-length of 72 mm. (=2.83 in.), exceeds in this
respect the largest specimens from the Novgorod Government, the Ilmen, or from Novaia
Zemlia only by some + or 1 millimetre, a difference too insignificant (for such large birds) to
serve for the identification of even this single example with the birds from East Siberia.’
The hypothesis that geese arrive thence to winter in Russian Turkestan proves therefore to
be founded on false data. Accordingly I had no other course than to add the Turkestan
A. middendorffii to the synonyms of М. arvensis, Brehm, and to give a new name to the
Siberian form, wrongly held by Middendorff, Schrenck, Radde, and others to be 4. grandis
of Pallas. We are now indeed aware that Pallas’s description of 4. grandis, based on
Gmelin’s statements, and not upon his own examination of the bird, does not agree
at all with the goose here described, but must be referred to Cygwopsis cygnoides, and
probably to a domesticated or half-domesticated representative of that bird. I have there-
fore proposed for the East Siberian form of the yellow-billed goose the name Melanonyx
arvensts sibirvicus.

It may be indeed that it would be better to regard this goose as an independent
species, and not as a variety or sub-species of the yellow-billed bird ; but as the differences
consist only of the greater size of the bill and the arrangement of the black and orange
colouring (the latter being reduced to a narrow ring, bordering both mandibles terminally),
the absence of white feathering along the base of the upper mandible, the somewhat darker
colouring of the back, and the slightly larger dimensions of the whole bird, I do not find
sufficient grounds for taking this course. Moreover, the fact that with the increase in the
length of ‘the bill in typical yellow-billed geese (once the culmen approaches 70 mm.
[ = 2.75 in.]) the yellow-orange colouring rapidly yields to the black, which occupies more than
the basal half of the bill, points to a specific relationship existing between these two geese.

As to the sculpture of the bills and relation of the upper nail to the total length of
the culmen, shown in the following drawings, the two forms of this goose offer no essential
difference.

1 Mr. Buturlin mentions yellow-bills in the Novgorod Government with bills of more than 70 mm. along the culmen, and himself
brought from Novaia Zemlia in 1902 a bill with culmen 714 mm. (= 2.81 in.). |

106 Geese of Europe and Asia

ADULT BIRDS

Head and neck grey-brown, for the most part with strong rufous, coffee, or grey-bay
tint. A male from Amurland,! figured in the plate, has even a golden-buff colour on the head
and neck, and apparently such examples are far from being of rare occurrence locally in East
Siberia, as indicated by the name,
“ vellow - headed goose, met with
among native appellations in Trans-
baikalia. АП. these various tints
are evidently of accidental origin,
and are just as often present in
different individuals as _ absent.
They are doubtless caused by the
same factors as the rusty or yellow
tinges on the heads of swans, ducks,
and other species of geese.

Sometimes this secondary
colouring is limited to the head
alone, or to the head and neck, but
in other cases, although less often,
it extends more or less regularly
to various parts of the plumage of
the body. Owing to the kindness

М. arvensis, 3 М. arvensts sibtricus, & of Professor M. A. Menzbier, I was
Culmen 66 mm. | Culmen 82 mm. ;
(Central Russia.) (Transbaikalia. ) able to examine an example of M.

arvensis in his collection, obtained
in the Moscow Government, which has a rufous tinge on the head and, here and there,
on the neck and body, and in which the feathering embracing the base Of the pills is
bright rusty colour.

In the rest of the plumage, except for a more uniform dark brown colouring on
the upper surface of the body (which again must be verified by a large number of
specimens), the eastern form does not differ from the type. Even in dimensions, with
the exception, of course, of the bill and feet, WW. arvensis sibiricus almost agrees with
large examples of M/Z. arvensis, and, it would seem, also in weight rarely exceeds them.
In absolutely all the specimens I have examined the yellow colouring of the bill was
concentrated on its apical part, forming a ring round both mandibles, and beginning
immediately behind the nail of the upper mandible. The breadth of this ring is some-
what variable, and occasionally very small, as, for example, in the specimens figured by
Middendorff (5%. Ю., pl. xx. fig. т) and by Khomyakov (РА Ryazansk. g., pl. il. P. 3)
and only occasionally does the yellow-orange colouring of this ring reach back to the
anterior edge of the nasal depressions. Indeed, I do not know a single instance of the
yellow colouring from this ring projecting in a wedge backwards under the nares ог
along the edge of the upper mandible, as is always the case in the yellow-billed goose,
after the second year. The whole of the remainder of the bill in the Siberian goose 1S
black. Although I have already mentioned the fact elsewhere, 1 deem it not superfluous

1 Obtained by G. T. Radde, and now in the British Museum,

Middendorft’s Goose 107

to repeat that the black, which at times extends somewhat backwards from the nail on

to the anterior part of the orange ring, must by no means be taken for the beginning of
the black nail of the upper mandible. With careful scrutiny it is easier to ascertain
where the posterior edge of the nail runs in the specimens in which it is less clearly marked
than in those in which it is sharply defined.

In not a single example of the Siberian form have I seen а white border along
the base of the bill, although I admit the possibility of this appearing in some
cases, but only to a very limited degree, that is to say, with separate plumules.
In the majority of cases the number of teeth on each side of the upper mandible in
the Siberian race varies between 26 and 30, but examples occur in which they do
not exceed 24 in number. I give below а table of measurements of the bill of this
goose, showing the limitations within which I have hitherto been able to follow the
fluctuations in the proportion of the culmen-length of the upper mandible, the greatest
depth of the visible part of the lower, and the number of teeth along the edges of the
upper mandible. Unfortunately, in the majority of cases the sex of the birds was not
noted on the skins.

ед
mm. in. mm. in.

6) 22 Г2 = 0,47 кА 2 Е. Siberia; probably Taimyr peninsula.

re) Е О GS CYS 30 Kamchatka; Voznesensky, ‘‘Giet” ; head rusty.

? Fie ae OG T= .39 24 R. Moniero. Czewakinski; head brown rusty.

р Pisa DUO ae 26 К. Tunka, Radde ; head very rusty.

? 4 == 3720 Pies Ort 28 Bering Isl. ; Grebnicki; head brown.

р 1S =-8-97 ae 30 ?Taimyr peninsula.

р 22 9-05 я Kamchatka ; Voznesensky.
ре о TO, 520,40 28 Radde ; Amur; head and neck bay.

р О oa oan Yakutsk ; M. A. Menzbier coll.
?Q 0 = 2.09 то — 0.30 29 Adycha (Yana); Bunge; head dark coffee.
ae [A= 2:01 G= 6,35 28 Yakutsk ; М. A. Menzbier coll. ; head dark coffee.
3 о, 00.30 28 Yakutsk ; М. A. Menzbier coll. ; head coffee-brown.
Ф juv. ОЕ ОЕ р Su-Chou ; Brothers Grum-Grzymailo expedition.

YounG BIRDS

Of these I know nothing, except the above-mentioned female from Su-Chou, which
I regard as a bird in first plumage or a yearling, but not more.
and all the feathers are narrower than in adults.

In some specimens, which apparently are not quite mature, there are a few white
plumules on the chin, and in one the whole mental angle is white; but even in this
example there are no traces of white plumules at the base of the bill.

As to the young in down, I have no information.

The dimensions of the adult birds are compiled from authors who have written
on this goose, and from the material at my own disposal.

The plumage is duller

Total length 780—930 mm. (= 30.07—36.60 in.).

Spread | up to [390ml (= 5476 1h)
Wing . 450—505 mm. (17.70—19.80 in.).
Culmen 74—83 mm. (= 2.90—3.26 in.).

Depth of bill at base
Breadth of bill at base .
Breadth of bill (middle of nares)

36—38 mm. (= 1.41—1.49 in.).
В == see Nolo
25 mm. (0.98 in.).

. orca

108 Geese of Europe and Asia

Greatest depth of lower mandible seen from without with shut bill 9—12 mm. (= 0.35—0.47 in.).
Tarsus. ; 74—84 mm. (= 2.91—3.30 in.).
Middle digit ие Bis : , 73—76 mm. (= 2.87—2.99 in.).
Claw of middle digit : : . Circa 16-17 mm. (0.63—0.66 in.).

Number of teeth on each side af ace? а 24—30; 24 I met with only once.

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

Although, in consequence of the confusion of this goose with large specimens of
other representatives of the genus M/elanonyx (М. segetum serrirostris and М. mentalis),
the range is not fully ascertained, yet it may be asserted with confidence that the species
abounds everywhere in East Siberia, from the Taimyr peninsula eastwards to Kamchatka,
Chukchiland, and the Komandor Islands.

How far north it travels to breed cannot yet be Me determined, but we know
that it nests on the River Boganida, on the lower reaches of the Yana, on the Vilyui
in the Vakut Government, and almost everywhere throughout Siberia between Lake Baikal
and the Sea of Japan, near great rivers and lakes southwards to 50° N. lat. and possibly
still farther south.

It breeds on the Chukchi peninsula and in Kamchatka, and, probably, in suitable
spots along the whole coast of the Okhotsk Sea.

This goose nests alike in the lowlands and on the hills. It migrates to pass the
winter in China and Japan, but how far it descends southwards for this purpose we have
no idea.

In the notice of the yellow-billed species I have already refused to credit the alleged
wintering of the Siberian form in Turkestan, at any rate on the basis of existing data.
In like manner not a single case is authenticated of this goose straying into European
Russia and Western Europe, although it may of course happen that such a visit takes
place. It is recorded, for instance, that a specimen of Vyvoca beri, Radde, was killed
in 1901 near Tring.

Neither is the western boundary of the nesting area of this species in Siberia yet
established. . Middendorff, indeed, found it on the Boganida, but it is quite possible that
it breeds even still farther west, thus meeting the typical yellow-billed species.

This goose arrived on the Tarei-nor, according to Radde, simultaneously with the
grey-lag (duser anser) at the end of March, so that it is among the first of the geese,
but on the Irkut, in the same year, it arrived in May, which must probably be ascribed
to chance. On the Boganida it appears, according to Middendorff, in flocks at the same
time as /М. segetum (= arvensis’), to the note of which species its own is similar, although
hoarser. It also moults simultaneously with the latter, and consequently breeds at the
same time. According to the statements of the natives, this goose dives excellently,
so that it is captured only with difficulty by the fowler.'

With regard to its breeding on the Vilyui, Mr. Maak remarks that: “It builds its
nest near the Vilyui and its tributaries, on lakes far removed from habitations, and young
in down were found as early.as June 8. Moulting usually continues till the beginning
of August; on July 29 I found moulting birds, while on August 4 on the Khaingia (65.
N. lat.) some flocks of this species were already flying.

“This observation is in complete accord with the statements of the local Tungus,

1 Of course fowler here must be understood to mean the trader, who takes his geese while moulting.

Middendorff $ Goose 109

who remain in this district till that time (August 1) and kill the geese with their dogs.
On August 7 а female was killed on the Khaingia which had not yet completely finished
moulting, and weighed 83 16$.” !

Of the eggs of this goose, I give measurements of Daurian specimens (from Aksha)
according to Taczanowski. In colour the eggs are almost white or yellowish, but after
being brooded they become dingy yellowish, and are blotched with grey.

Breadth 53.2 mm. 2.09 in.), 1епо 73.6 mm. (= 2.89 in.).

oe
” 53-0") 5 ( = 2.11 ,, ); ’ о (= = 3.07 5 ).
› 55.8 ” (= 2.19 5 )} ” от. 5 (= 3-20 5
” 55-3 ys (= 2.17 5, о ” 82 ) (= 3.22 5, )
о ой 9 ( = 2.24 5, oF ” 85 ” ( = 3:34 » ).
” 5 ws (= 2.25 › J ” 88.4 › (= 3.49 » ).
» 59 ” ( = 2.32 » ” 90 ” (= 3. ” i

I add the following notes, from Mr. G. F. Gobel, on three examples of eggs, very
probably belonging to this goose, the property of the Zoological Museum of the Academy
of Science at St. Petersburg.

“The eggs from Siberia are of the size of large specimens of the grey-lag (duser
anser), but with the well-marked structure of the shell of a bean-goose (Velanonyx). I give
their dimensions, as they probably belong to М. arvensis sibiricus.’

“(a) Breadth 62 mm. (= 2.44 in.); length 92.5 mm. (= 3.64 in.); weight 2070 cgrm.
ы (2) ” Ор, ( = 2.44 › ) ) ” QI.5 › ( = 3.60 ,, ) ) ” 2022 5
к (с) ” бт 2) ЕЕ 2.40 >) ) ; р 93.5 5 (= 3.68 55 ) ) ) 2082 9

“Mean breadth 61.7 mm. (= 2.42 in.); mean length 92.5 mm. (= 3.64); mean weight 2058 cgrm.

“The length exceeds the breadth by 30.8 mm. (=1.21 in.), and in form they

consequently come nearest to the eggs of М. brachyrhynchus.”

| The measurements given both by Taczanowski and Gobel cannot be accepted as
absolutely belonging to eggs of the goose here described, although it 1$ very probable that
they are referable to that species.

Although a difference occurs in the size of the eggs described = Taczanowski and by
Gobel, it does not exceed the limits of variation which may be met with in different clutches
of one and the same species.

The carelessness of egg-collectors, and their ignorance in the majority of cases of the
birds themselves, make it impossible to place any reliance on their determination of the
species of geese to which their specimens pertain. Accordingly, only when well-authenticated
- eggs of the Siberian representatives of the genus A7e/anonyx are collected will it be possible
to say positively to which the above measurements and weights really refer.

I may conclude this notice with an expression of regret that there are such a large
number of fowlers in Siberia who every year have the opportunity of observing and shooting
these geese, and who consequently become well acquainted with their habits and manners,
and yet so few observations are recorded.

It is true, there are many descriptions of goose-hunts in Siberia in the sporting
magazines and books of travel, but in almost all cases the birds are called simply “ geese,”
and there are no indications by which it is possible to even approximately guess the species
of which the authors write.

1 It must be remembered that the females are always considerably smaller and especially lighter than the ganders.
2 Gobel’s MS. has Anser middendorffit.

THE BEAN-GOOSE
MELANONVX SEGETUM, GMELIN
pr late ы

English—Bean Goose; Bog Goose; Harvest Goose (this species in England has hitherto been
generally confounded with М. arvensis).

Russian—Gus; 94 gus; guméunik; gumenntk; gumyounik; pashenny gus, sibiryak
(Kazan Gov., Bogdanov); femnoklyuvy gumennik (Buturlin); gumenntk zapadno-
sibirsky (Buturlin); Zoltsenosy gumennik (Kholodk. and Silantyev); ° gumenntk-
nemok (on Kolguev, Trevor-Battye); °?emtyr; ?иетауа kazarka and ? khrushkot
(Perm Gov., Sabaneev'); ? раму gus (Kazan Gov., Ruzsky). |

Samoyed—-/ebtan (Pechora district,* Seebohm).

German—K/Jeine Saatgans; Ringelschniblige Saatgans; Roggengans; LBohnengans ;
Zuggans; Wilde Gans; kleine Wilde Gans; kleine Hagelgans; Schneegans ;
Moorgans (these names taken from Naumann).

French—Ovze sauvage ; ote des motssons (names common to yellow-bill).

Anser sylvestris, Frisch, Убе. Deutschl., pl. 155; Artsybashev, Bull. Soc. Мовс., 1859, iii. р. 100; Degl. and
Gerbe, Ornit. Eur., ii. р. 487 (1867) (рат).

Anser fabalis, Latham, Gen. Syn., Suppl. 1. р. 297 (1787); Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus., xxvii. p. 99, 1895
(partim) ; Bianchi, “ Yezheg. Zool. Muz.,” vit. 1902, р. 271.

Anser fabalus (errore), Buturlin, Dikie Gusi Ros. Imp, р. 35 (“ Psov. i Ruzh. Okh.,” 1901).

Anas segetum, Gmelin, Syst. Nat. 1. 2, р. 512, No. 68 (1788); Bechstein, Nat. Deutschl., 2nd. ed., iv. р. 883
(1801).

Anser ferus, Bonnaterre, Encyclop. Méthod, 1. р. 110, No. 7 (1790) (Exclus. a, 6).

Anser segetum, Bonnaterre, Encyclop. Méthod, 1. р. 116 (1790); Meyer, Taschenb.,, ii. р. 554 (1810); Erasmann, —
Ye. I. Or. Кг., р. 555 (1868); Naum., Убе. Deutschl., xi. р. 300, pl. 287 (1842); zd, Naumannia, 1853,
pp. 5-8, pl. 1. figs. D, Е, Е (vostra); Palmén, Cab. Journ. Ё Orn., xxiv. р. 53 (1876); Menzbier, Pt.
Ros. 1. р. 741 (рат), 1895 ; 24., Prom. Pt. Ros. i Kavk., р. 469, pl. 134 (1902); Pleske, Th, Vog.
Kola Hlbns. Beitr. Kent. Russ. R., ix. р. 235 (parti), 1886; Pleske, Е. D., Krit. obz. Mlek. i Ptits
Kolsk. pol-va, pp. 336 and 341 (1887); Biichner and Pleske, Beitr. Orn. S. P. G., 1881, №. 177;
Biichner, Pt. Spb. gub. р. 512 (1884); Kholodkovsky and Silantyev, Pt. Yevropy, р. 522, pl. 42,
fig. 2; Buturlin, ТаЫ. Фуа opred. Plastinch. (“Psov. i. Ruzh. ОКВ.” 1900); zd, separ, р. 8;
Silantyev, Opred. Yevr. РЕ, р. 112 (1901); Вит, Sinopt. tabl. ОКБ. Pt. Ros. Imp., р. 44 (1901);
Lorenz., Vég. Mosk. Gouv., 1894, р. 58; Sushkin, Pt. Ufimsk. gub., р. 69, etc. (1897); 24., Ibis, 1897;
11. р. 5 (rostrum); Semenov, “Pr. i Okh.” 1898, vii. pp. 12-13; Somov, Orn. Fauna Khark. gub.,
р. 443 (1897); Deryugin, Orn. izsl. Pskovsk. gub., “Trudy Imp. Spb. Obshch. Yest.,” Otd. zool.,
XXVil. pt. 3, Р. 27 (1897); М, ор. cet. 1898, р. 111 (partim?); Karamzin, Pt. Sam. i. Ufim- gub.,
p. 181; Smirnov, Zur Ornis des Barenzmeers (“ Orn. Jahrb.,” xii. 1901, pt. 6) (pro parte) ; Radde, Ornis
Cauc., р. 445 (райи) (1884); Nikolsky, Pozv. zh. Kryma, р. 289 (1 891) (partim?); Radde ( partim),

1 The majority of these names refer also to the yellow-bill.
2 It must be supposed that in the Pechora district the prevailing species under this name is М. arvensis.

IIO

Bean-Goose [11

= westaik Vest. Nauk, “pp. $32, 626 (1855); Radde (partzm), Bull. Soc. Mosc. 1854, 1. р.
160; Palmén, Cab. J. f. Orn. 1876, р. 53; Brauner, Kratk. Opred. Dichi Stepn. pol. pt. 1. р. 99
(1897); Ruzsky, Sistem. sp. ptits Kazan. gub. (“Trudy O. Ve. pri Kazan. un.,” xxv. pt. 6, p. 116)
(1893); Shatilov, “Izvest. Ob. L. Vest.” x. 2, pp. 82, 94 (1874) (partim?); Sabaneev, Prolet gusei,
“Zhurn. Imp. Obshch. ОКВ.” 1874 nena 24, Zveri Prom. Uralsk.. gor.; “ Beseda,” 1872, No. vi.
pp. 106-107 (partim); itd. “Bull. Soc. Nat. Mosc.” 1871, ii.; zd, Ukazatel, pp. 455-458 (1883);
Frohawk, Field, Oct. 4, 1902, р. 605 (rostrum) ; itd., Zoologist, Мо. 740, р. 41, pl. 11 (Feb. 1903).

ADULT BIRDS

In plumage this goose hardly differs from the yellow-billed species, although the
whole colouring is generally somewhat darker. Head and neck brown-grey, of various
shades in different individuals. Back of neck and breast grey with lighter edgings to feathers ;
under-parts becoming gradually lighter, and passing behind into white. Flanks brown with
white edgings to feathers. Vent and under tail-coverts white. Back and scapulars dark
brown with brownish white edgings to feathers, which in old individuals become lighter or
even whitish. Rump black-brown; upper wing-coverts white. Tail-feathers brown with
broad white edgings and tips. Greater and median wing-coverts black-brown-with whitish
edgings; lesser wing-coverts uniform brown-grey.

Flight-feathers blackish brown, but, as in all geese, with white shafts, except at the
tips, which are dark.

Upper edge of wing and whole of under-side, as also axillaries, very dark slate-grey.
Tail-feathers 18 to 20, according to Naumann, although I have never counted over 18. Female
generally somewhat smaller and more slenderly built than male.

Although the majority of authors state that at the base of the upper Pear: that is,
on the forehead and at the sides of the head, in this goose, there is a white area, I must say
I never saw it in any example. The most I have noticed is a whitish indefinite patch
on the apex of the forehead; but I have never seen anything in the bean-goose like the
white feathering on these parts in the yellow-billed species, and much doubt whether the
white ever has any considerable development there in the former. On the other hand, I
admit that sometimes adults may have a white patch on the feathering of the mental angle,
since I have seen young birds in a collection from Kolguev with white on the chin.

Legs and feet yellow-orange of varying intensity, with black claws; outer claw some-
times very light or even white (probably an individual variation).

The main distinguishing features. of the bill of this species are discussed later.

CGOSLINGS

Edgings of feathers on upper surface of body and flanks show a decided rufous tint.
Not a trace of white plumules at base of upper mandible, but on feathering of mental angle

there sometimes occurs a white patch, in rare cases occupying even the whole angle. Feet
rather yellow than orange.

YOUNG: Birps In First PLUMAGE

Head and neck dark earthy grey; throat somewhat lighter ; upper breast earthy
grey ; the rows of plumules, separated by furrows on sides of neck, have light tips which, as
Naumann thinks, are due to remains of down not quite broken off.

Breast with whitish edgings to feathers; under-parts light grey. Flanks, upper part
of back and shoulders earthy grey, passing towards tip of feathers, beyond brownish white

112 Geese of Europe and Asia

edging, into brown. Middle of wing similarly coloured ; axillaries and whole under-side of
wing dark black slate-grey with slightly lighter edges; primary coverts, primaries, and
secondaries dark brown. Latter with narrow white edgings, widening towards the tips.
Legs and feet dingy yellowish or grey-yellow.

YOUNG IN DOWN

Scarcely known with certainty; the sole undoubted example, which I had the оррог-
tunity of seeing later—when it was fully fledged—was caught, when withouta sign of quills,
on July 30, t901, on Kusov Island, at the entry to the Kara Straits off Novaia Zemlia.
According to Mr. N. A. Smirnov, who brought this specimen, together with two others
(which I did not see), this bird had a predominant light grey colouring; the bill was wholly
blackish, and the feet a dead black with dark claws. A month later the feet began to lighten,
passing into a yellowish, and a yellow patch appeared on the apex of the culmen.

These young in down were caught among stones on the seashore, and apparently
formed part of two united broods. The old birds were in full moult.

So far as I can judge from the comparatively insignificant material at my disposal,
and from authentic published data (of which there are very few), the measurements of adult
bean-geese are as follows :—

Wing . ; 410—450 mm. ( = 16.10—17.70 in.).
Culmen : ; 703 min. ( =2.24—2-A4 Tee
Depth of bill at Bao 31—32 mm. (= 1.22—1.25 in.).
Greatest depth of visible a of ewer ть veh Ate bill 74-11 mm. (=0.29-0.43 in.).
Tarsus с 74—76 mm. (= 2.90—3 in.).

Length of median dice claw а 80—85 mm. (= 3.14—3.34 in.).
Length of (median) claw : 10—12 mm. (=0.39—0.47 in.).

Number of teeth on each side Е upper Пане in ae ans, of cases, 20 to 21, but examples from
Kolguev showed a greater number, viz. from 20 to 24, of which more detail is given later.

BILL

I dwell at considerable length on the description of the bill of this species, since
it affords the best characters for distinguishing it from the yellow-billed goose. Naumann
first analysed in detail the difference in the structure of the bills of these two geese,
and, following his description, I have succeeded in finding another essential characteristic
which had escaped the attention of the German ornithologist, and so far, at any rate,
has proved very constant and, therefore, important.

In the bean-goose the bill is absolutely and relatively smaller, shorter, and thicker
than in JZ. arvensis, and at the same time of a more conical form, that is, its
sides meet at a more acute angle with the apex. The character which I found to be
very constant consists in the fact that, if the bill be looked at from above, the apparent
length of the nail in adult birds of М. segefum is contained in the total culmen-length
not more than 3} times, in younger birds between 31 and 34 times, while in М. arvensis
this same nail is contained in the culmen in adults up to 4%, and in young birds
4. times.

To show this more clearly, I give drawings of the bills of adult birds of both species.
The importance of this character is indicated by the fact that the same relations

1 The longest bill I have measured is бт mm. (=2.40 in.), and belonged to a large full-grown specimen from Kolguev.

ore
+

Bean-Goose 112

are preserved also in East Siberian representatives of the bean and yellow-billed geese
(И. segetum serrirostris and М. arvensis sibiricus), as we see from the description of
the latter. |

The nail of the upper mandible in М. segetum is narrower and sharper than
in М. arvensis. The upper mandible between the posterior edge of the nail and a
line uniting the anterior angles of the nasal depressions is nothing like so depressed
in М. segetum as in М. arvensis, but rises like a roof, so that, as seen from the side,
this part of the bill in the former is higher (thicker) than in the latter species.

The same may be said of the basal part of the culmen, which is less flat in the
bean than in the yellow-billed goose. The lower mandible in М. segetum is perceptibly
more arched, while its greatest depth, seen from without when closed, is not only
comparatively but absolutely greater. The nasal depressions, according to Naumann,
are comparatively shorter, and the nasal apertures smaller, although having a wider lumen
in their posterior part. |

М. segetum, & М. arvensis, & | М. arvensis, Ф
Culmen 601 mm, Culmen 66 mm. Culmen 70 mm.
(Northern Russia. ) (St. Petersburg.) (Ryazan. )

In reality, then, the differences in the structure of the nares, pointed out by Naumann,
are very minute, and, although they cannot be denied, are insufficiently marked to serve
as trustworthy characters in distinguishing between these two geese, and particularly in the
case of dry skins, when in consequence of shrinking the form of both the nasal depressions
and the apertures changes so much.

In regard to the number of teeth in the upper mandible, on which Naumann insists
when distinguishing these two geese, I must say that at first I fully shared the view
of this ornithologist, as when examining all the bean-geese at my disposal I found
that there were from 20 to 21 on each side of the upper mandible. But the specimens
of М. segetum brought by Mr. Buturlin from Kolguev in 1902, and the geese of the
same species obtained by Mr. Pike in Holland in January 1903 and sent to the British
Museum, showed that the number may reach 24, or perhaps even 25. In my
opinion, as stated in the Introduction and elsewhere in this volume, the majority

Q

114 Geese of Europe and Asia

of the bean-geese at first examined were young birds, while among the specimens brought
by Mr. Buturlin the number 24 occurs exclusively in old birds.

Among the eight Kolguev geese, in one example there are 20 teeth on each
side of the upper mandible; in two, 21; in one, on one side 21, on the other 22:
in two, on one side 22, on the other, 23; and in two, 23 on one side, and 24 on the
other. |

Of the four bean-geese from Holland mentioned above, according to Mr. Frohawk,
two examples had 21 on each side; in one, there were 21 on the right side and 22 on
the left; and finally in one gander there were 24 teeth on each side.

On finding that the Kolguev geese had such a number of teeth, I thought this
apparent anomaly might be ascribed to the interbreeding in Kolguev between yellow-
billed and bean-geese; but I no longer hold this opinion, as I have found a similar
variation in the number of teeth in other geese.

On the whole, I may say that as the number of teeth is not constant, it cannot
be considered as an absolutely good distinctive character to differentiate the bean-
goose from the yellow-billed species, but it may yet serve as an auxiliary character in
discriminating between young birds of these two species, in which the pattern on the bill
is very similar. |

Accordingly, if we see a young goose of this group with 20 or 21 teeth on each
side of the upper mandible, we may be almost certain that we have to do with М. segetum,
and the further examination of the bill, that is, the relation of the nail to the culmen-
length, will not fail to confirm this; in like manner, if we have a young goose with
24 or 25 or more teeth on each side of the upper mandible, we may safely assert that
it is not WZ. segetum.

If we add to this difference in the bills of these two species the fact that, in the vast
majority of cases, in /М. segetum the yellow or yellow-orange colouring! is concentrated on
the apical part of the bill, while in М. arvensis it prevails over the black (I here speak
of adults), I think these differences will suffice (when taken together) to discriminate
with complete certainty between the bean and the yellow-billed goose, in spite of the
considerable degree of individual variations to which the bills of these two geese are
subject.

The figures of the bills of these two species given on Plate 23 of this work show
these differences still more clearly, and, Г hope, will serve in the future to remove the
confusion which has reigned in this group of geese for more than a century, notwithstanding
the clear explanation of their differences given by Naumann in 1842.

In conclusion, I may refer to the question whether specimens of the bean-goose
ever occur in which the colouring of the yellow-orange band on the upper mandible extends
beyond the nasal apertures and stretches more or less back along the tomia. No such
examples have ever come into my hands, but that they do occasionally occur is demonstrated
by a sketch by Mr. Frohawk of a bill of this type from a goose killed in England, and
also from the fact that similar individuals have been brought by Mr. Buturlin from
Kolguev.?

1 For the colouring of the bill in this species, see Appendix entitled ‘“ Novaia Zemlia Bean-Goose.”

2 Since this was written, my son shot a specimen of this species in the mouth of the Neva, in April 1904, with the yellow colour
on the bill extending far back under the nostrils,

Bean-Goose 115

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

Owing to the almost universal confounding of the bean with the yellow-billed goose,
it is still impossible to determine exactly either all the nesting areas or all the routes of
migration, and the winter haunts of the former bird.

In spite of the assertions of certain ornithologists and sportsmen that this goose
migrates in some districts in spring or autumn in large flocks, such statements must be
treated with great caution, and even sometimes with incredulity, and it is wise to consider
the exact range of the species as practically unknown.

The fact is that, in the arrangement of the black and yellow-orange colouring on the
bill, young yellow-billed geese (especially before attaining two years) are very like adult
bean-geese, and may even be easily mistaken, on a superficial inspection, for old birds of this
species, since, notwithstanding their youth, they do not yield in size to the latter.

Thus if we confine ourselves, as do the majority of observers, to the pattern on the
bill, the confusion between these two species is easily understood; and beyond doubt such
confusion has often occurred. I again repeat, therefore, that it is impossible from the
information at present existing to get an exact notion of the habitat of these two species,
so like to each other at first sight, but in reality perfectly distinct.

One fact is, however, proved, namely, that the geographical distribution of М. segetum
is far from always coinciding with that of М. arvens?s: on the contrary, it is slightly more
restricted; while, on the whole, the bean-goose is incomparably less numerous than the
yellow-billed species.

In Lapland, for example, on the Kola peninsula, and also in Finland, as noted by Dr.
Palmén (and afterwards by Mr. В. D. Pleske), the majority of statements as to the bean-goose
being found there must be received with more than mistrust. It is, indeed, probable that
only the most insignificant percentage of these records really refer to this species, and the
great majority to the yellow-bill. Only recently, that is since Mr. Buturlin’s expedition to
Kolguev in 1902, have we ascertained (from the material brought back by that energetic and
talented explorer) that this species breeds on that island, in company with М. arvensis.
True, we knew that Mr. Trevor-Battye had found it on Kolguev, but we could not be sure
whether the bean or the yellow-billed species was the one mentioned by that author under
the name of bean-goose, since he brought home no material proofs,! and in England, till
recently, these two species were universally included under the name of bean-goose. On
the other hand, from Mr. Trevor-Battye’s description of some specimens of these Kolguev
bean-geese, we are entitled to assume that, besides the yellow-billed and the bean-goose,
Sushkin’s goose also breeds on the island in question, as in Novaia Zemlia, where all three
nest together. Novaia Zemlia appears, indeed, to be a well-authenticated breeding-ground
for the bean-goose, as specimens were obtained there by Mr. М. A. Smirnov in 1901.2

In other words, for the north of Russia and Europe generally, we can only say that
Kolguev and Novaia Zemlia are authenticated breeding-grounds of this species; this,
perhaps, being the reason why we so seldom meet with specimens of the bean-goose in
collections, while the yellow-billed goose is always comparatively well represented.

Of Lapland, apparently, this species is not a native, even in the breeding season, and

1 As testified by a letter from the author in my possession.
2 The heads in spirit, and the skin of a young bird in first plumage, brought by Mr. Smirnov, are in the Zoological Museum at St.

Petersburg. These specimens were quoted in vol. vii. of the Yezhegodnik Zool. у muzeya Akad. Nauk (1902, р. 271) by У. L. Bianchi as
Anser fabalis (Lath. ).

116 Geese of Europe and Asia

probably occurs there only on migration, and even then in very limited numbers. The same,
probably, is the case with Finland. In the Novgorod Government, even if it be met with
on migration (on the Ilmen, for example), it occurs in any case in insignificant numbers
compared with the countless hosts of М. arvensis. 1 can indeed testify that the so-called
specimens of M7. segetum brought from there proved to be young yellow-billed geese, with the
black prevailing over the yellow-orange on the bill, as is always the case in young birds (up
to 2-3 years) of M7. arvensis. In the Moscow Government, according to Mr. Е. К. Lorenz,
the present species is very rare as a migrant compared with other kinds. That it is found
in the Kharkov Government more frequently than М. arvensis, as stated by Mr. М. М.
Somov, Iam compelled to doubt on strong grounds, as also the assertion of authors who
affirm that on the Middle Volga, in the Simbirsk and Kazan Governments, it occurs in
abundance on passage, predominating over the yellow-billed species.

Although I have not sufficient data to absolutely refute such statements, I prefer to
await more precise information, and to see specimens from the spots where these geese are
supposed to occur in such numbers.

We have already seen that the so-called М. segetum recorded Бу Мг. Khomyakov
from the Ryazan Government turned out to belong to М. arvensis, and the same result
followed, on examination, in the case of the Turkestan bean-geese in Severtsov’s collection.
Accordingly, I have good grounds for regarding with distrust the statements of their
abundance on the Middle Volga, and in the Kharkov Government, and therefore believe
that in each case young dark-billed specimens of /М. arvensis were taken for adults of
М. segetum. It must also be borne in mind as being quite possible that some of the
migrating bean-geese recorded, for example, from the Kama, actually belonged not to
this species, but to Sushkin’s goose (ЛМ. meglectus), described by Dr. Sushkin, and
encountered by him in large numbers on passage in the Ufa Government.

On the whole, then, from a careful study of the question, I conclude that, alike
in European Russia and in Western Europe, and (so far as can be judged at present) in
Western Siberia, the bean-goose is by far less numerous than the yellow-billed species.

On migration, /М. segetum reaches eastwards to Lake Baikal, as proved by two skins
from Kultuk; but it must be inferred that it arrives there from breeding-grounds lying
to the west of the mouths of the Yenisei, as, starting from the Taimyr peninsula east-
wards, it is apparently everywhere replaced by the thick-billed variety (М. segetum
serrivostris), which is described later. That some of the geese breeding in the Far North
fly west or south-west, and others south-east, cannot be doubted; and it is, probably,
the eastern migration-route of the bean-goose that passes near Lake Baikal. Where
М. segetum, when migrating this way, has to go to reach its winter haunts, is difficult
to say, but since it must be supposed that it winters in some part of China, it seems
probable that both the typical form and its Eastern representative, servvivostris, may there
winter together.

I have not identified the typical М. segetum from East Siberia, although many
travellers write of its existence there in incredible numbers. Consequently, one of two
things must be the case: either all the bean-geese of East Siberia taken by travellers
for MZ. segetum belong to М. segetum serrivostris, or both kinds occur there together.
The latter alternative would, of course, be in favour of the specific distinctness of
М. servirostrts.

On the other hand, if the typical bean-goose were really met with on passage and

Bean-Goose | rey

nesting (in large numbers) in East Siberia, how are we to explain the fact that I have not
found a single example in all the collections I have examined? On these grounds, I come
to the conclusion that in East Siberia, where it is generally known under the name of bean-
goose, there exists not the typical 17. segetum, but its thick-billed representative, first noted
by Gould? and afterwards described by Swinhoe as MZ. segetuim serrirostris.

Especially interesting is the fact that the latter form occurs even far more west than
Lake Baikal, as is proved by specimens obtained on passage in April near Barnaul and
kindly forwarded to me by Professor N. F. Kashchenko, of Tomsk University. Thus, if it
be admitted that some of the typical М. segetwm breeding in the Far North travel south-west
to winter, and some south-east, and also that this species nests in Russia only between
44° and 80’,* it will be easily understood why it is not met with in Turkestan, or (if it occur
there) only as a rare and occasional straggler. The two divergent routes of its passage must
avoid Turkestan ; and there is thus no possibility of the species getting there, with its given
breeding-range.

Only if these geese travelled straight from north to south, could we expect them to
occur in Turkestan. That some flocks of JZ segetum from the Far North fly south-west is
beyond doubt, and the flocks of these geese occurring in Western Europe are certainly all
of Russian origin.. Where, then, we may ask, do these masses of bean-geese seen on
passage on the Kama and the Middle Volga pass the winter ?

We know that neither in the Transcaspian nor in the Caspian region (with Leukoran
and the whole western shore) does this species occur, either on migration or in winter,
and if it is recorded from Transcaspia as a rare bird, this is in all probability in error
for М. arvensis. In the valley of the Kura, in Transcaucasia, Dr. С. T. Radde saw, during
warm winters, many bean-geese, but we do not know of what species, since, in his Orvis
Caucasica, this author declares that he unites 7. segetum and М. arvensis in one species, оп
the authority of Mr. Dresser.

In the Azov district representatives of the genus Me/anonyx are so scarce on both
migrations that they are quite lost in the masses of greater and lesser white-fronted geese,
and practically never fall to the gunners, at least in those parts of the region where I shot

~ so many years.

There remain the Black Sea and its shores, but of these we know scarcely anything,
and what species of bean-geese winter in the Crimea (on the Sivash and in various bays)
we unfortunately have no knowledge, although we may surmise that here are the winter
haunts of bean, yellow-billed, and even Sushkin’s geese.

From North-east Africa and throughout Egypt the bean-goose is absent; but it
winters, apparently, together with the yellow-billed species, in some other parts of the
Mediterranean basin. Unfortunately, however, owing to its being confounded with other
geese of the group Me/anonyx, it is at present impossible to ascertain exactly where
ЛМ. segetum occurs in winter. In the vast flooded swamps (marismas and lagunas) of
Southern Spain Mr. Abel Chapman met with bean-geese, in the course of a series of years
of sport, in far less numbers than the grey-lag; but unfortunately this observer did not
discriminate between the two species of the former.

As to Central Europe, there is no doubt that М. segetum is met with almost every-
where on passage together with AZ. arvenszs, and it is probably a regular migratory species

1 In MS.
2 Assuming that it breeds from Kolguev and Novaia Zemlia eastwards to the mouths of the Yenisei,

118 Geese of Europe and Asia

locally, as, for example, in Hungary. For the reasons above stated I find it, however, quite
impossible, without first examining European collections, to ascertain the exact routes of its
passage through Europe.

All that I can surmise from the available literature is that the bean-goose in Western
Europe is far less numerous than the yellow-billed species. In Great Britain “ bean-geese”
remain to winter locally in considerable numbers, but till recently they were all, except the
pink-footed species, classed under the collective designation of ‘ bean-geese.”

Wishing to clear up the matter, I applied to Mr. Frohawk, who readily took up the
question; and the result of his investigations was the note, with figures of the bills of the
bean and yellow-billed goose, in the Fze/d of October 4, 1902. It is there stated he only
saw a single example of М. segetum, one of a pair killed in Norfolk in January 1884, now in
Mr. J. H. Gurney’s collection. All the other “ bean-geese” shot in England proved to
belong to M7. avvensis. Accordingly it may be safely affirmed that in Great Britain the
bean-goose is out of all proportion less numerous than the yellow-billed kind, an inference
in complete accord with what I had written to Mr. Frohawk on the subject.

It is, however, quite possible that, besides these two species, Sushkin’s goose may
also winter in Great Britain, since there is the evidence of specimens which the late Mr. J.
Cordeaux could not refer to any one of the described species of this group. Although I have
not yet received full replies to my questions on this point, such straying of Sushkin’s goose
(which, as already stated, breeds in Novaia Zemlia) to England would not be at all surprising.

In Holland, Belgium, France, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey, and Greece
М. segetum is certainly met with, but everywhere, as it seems to me, in scant numbers
as compared with М. arvensts.

Here I may quote a circumstance testifying to how little this goose is known in
Europe. In answer to my request to send me a skin of a typical bean-goose,’ I received
under that name from a well-known firm, trading in bird-skins, a young white-fronted goose
Cdunser albifrons).

In a word, considerable time must elapse before our knowledge of the distribution of
the bean-goose in Western Europe assumes a true shape, and I shall be only too happy if
my present work helps to throw light on the question.

In Finland I have not met with this goose, either breeding or headin: but it can
hardly be doubted that it occurs there locally on passage. In regard to Archangel, the
Pechora tundra, and Transuralia, we are also still in complete darkness in this respect.

That the species is found sometimes as a migrant near St. Petersburg we know from
the works of Messrs. F. D. Pleske and Е. A. Biichner, but I am convinced that it is there far
less abundant than М. arvensts. I may add that I venture to consider the occurrence
of ЛИ. segetum in the Taimyr peninsula (Boganida) recorded by Middendorff to be based
partly on the yellow-billed and partly on М. segetum serrirvostris, but in no sense on the
typical bean-goose.

With this I conclude all the scanty information I have been able to gather with
regard to the range of this species.

NESTING AND НАРВ!Т$

According to Мг. С. Е. Gdbel, on Novaia Zemlia the bean-goose builds its nest on dry
tussocks near lakes, but we are still without any further authentic information. The same

' When I was only just beginning this work.

Bean-Goose _ 119

ornithologist states that the eggs of the bean-goose have yellow blotches on a white ground,
only a few of them being pure white. On the basis of 17 eggs from Chernaya Guba,
Novaia Zemlia, examined by Mr. Gobel, we get the following table of their measurements
and weight.

In these specimens are combined :—

Max. breadth 62 mm. (= 2.24 in.), with 861 mm. ( = 3.40 in.) length, and 1680 cgrm. weight.

Min. 3 оо os ene cea enn Sa о Е
ее о. о »

Min. ” 76 ›› (= 2.99 » } » 59 > (= 2.38 ” ) > pees 9 4 id

Max. weight 1680 cerm., о. „ 865 mm. (=3.40 in.) length.
Min. м О. а ПО ОР Е О Е $s 8:00 Е

The means of these figures are :—

17 eggs: mean breadth 56.2 mm. (= 2.21 in.) ; max. breadth 59 mm. (= 2.32 in.); min. breadth 53 mm. ( = 2.08 in.).
а » length 83.7 „ (=3.29 „); » length 88 „ (=3.46 „); „ length 76 , (=2.99 , ).
12 5 » weight 1380 cgerm.; „| Weleht 1650, corm. ; „ weight 1183 cgrm.

When I wrote this, I was unaware that М. neglectus also breeds in Novaia Zemlia.
I cannot therefore guarantee that some of the eggs in this list do not belong to the latter.
I feel it the more incumbent on me to express that apprehension, lest Mr. Gobel might have
drawn up the above table on the evidence of eggs of this ‘‘ bean-goose,” for which of course
he would not be in the least to blame, as he did not himself collect the eggs. The fact that
the eggs measured by Mr. Gobel are larger than those even of the yellow-billed goose,
coupled with the fact that the bean-goose is less in size than the former, to some degree
justifies my fears.

At present we do not know whether JZ. segetum has any peculiar habits as compared
with the yellow-billed and Sushkin’s goose; but it is probable that no essential differences
in this respect exist among the different bean-geese.

“NOVAIA ZEMLIA BEAN-GOOSE ”
MELANONYX CARNEIROSTRIS, BUTURLIN

Anser segetum, Heuglin, Ornith, von Novaja Semlja und Waigatch (Journ. f. Orn, Cab. 1872, рр. 121 and
122); Menzbier, Pt. Ross, 1. р. 747 (1895); Buturlin, Tabl. dlya Opred. Plastinchatokl. (“ Psov. i
Ruzh. Okh.,” 1900); z@., зераг., р. 7; ? Dresser, Birds of Europe, vi. р. 369 (fartzm?, Nov. Zeml.),
1878; ? Naumann, Vogel Deutschl, xi. р. 287 (1842) (Rostro rubicundo pedibus flavis); Frohawk,
MS. et figura capitis, Feb. 1903.

Anser (Melanonyx) carnetrostris, Buturlin, Dikie Gusi Ross. Imp. (“ Psov. i Ruzh. Okh.,” 1901); 24, separ., pp.
28-30 (1901).

? Anser brachyrhynchus, Semenov, “ Prir. i Okhot.,” July 1898, pp. 13-14.

2 Anser rufescens, Smirnov, “Zur Ornis 4. Barenzmeeres.,” Ornith. Jahrb., xii. 1901, pt. 6, pp. 206-207;
? Palmén, Finl. Fogl., ii. р. 339 (= segetum ?)

Але’ carnetrostris, Semenov, “ Rossiya,” ii. р. 104 (1902).

JupGiInG by the information to hand, the goose first described by von Heuglin from
Novaia Zemlia, and subsequently called Melanonyx carnetrostvis by Виа, is distin-
guished from the typical bean-goose (М. segetum), to which a yellow-orange band on the
bill is usually ascribed, merely by the fact that this band, instead of being yellow-orange, is
dark flesh-colour, while the legs and feet are of the same yellow colour (of various tints) as
in Melanonyx segetum.

Unfortunately, no ornithologist has of late years carefully examined and preserved
specimens of М. carnezrostris, although several undoubtedly have had them in their hands.

For example, Professor М. A. Menzbier writes quite definitely of them in his P#zfsy
Rosstt:' ‘Such geese have often been in my hands among ordinary bean-geese, to which
I referred them.”

Of a goose with a light flesh-coloured bill and yellow feet from the Ryazan Govern-
ment, where it was shot from a flock simultaneously with the ordinary М. segetum,
Mr. А. P. Semenov makes mention. _

Personally I have not seen fresh-killed geese with such different colouring of bill
and feet, although it is quite probable that I have had such in my hands among skins
of bean-geese I have examined; but, as I have already more than once said in the present
work, it is impossible to infer the colouring of the soft-parts of the living birds from
such skins. I was extremely delighted, therefore, by a letter I received from Mr.
Frohawk of February 28, 1903, containing not only a description but a coloured figure of
the head of a goose which I cannot but consider to be the so-called Novaia Zemlia
bean-goose, as it agreed with the characters given by von Heuglin.

This goose (a female) was killed in Holland on February 17, 1903, by Mr. Pike,
who at once sent it to Mr. Frohawk, by whom straightway the bill was drawn, and careful
measurements taken.

р Во
120

99

“МЮ шота Zemlia Bean-Goose [21

The colouring of the band on the bill of this example is pure vermilion, attaining
its greatest brightness on the culmen, while the legs and feet are described by Mr.
Frohawk as apricot-yellow. Attached to the drawing is the statement that the number
of teeth on each side of the upper mandible is 25, but that the hindmost one is very
small.

In its structure the bill of this specimen agrees with those of typical bean-geese,
and the nail of the upper mandible is contained exactly 3% times in the total length of
the bill. Further details appear below.

Weight . : ' , ; 7 15. 3 02.
Expanse , : | 4 feet тот in.
Total length Bf ae ; , 303 in.
Length from apex of bill to pase of meek . ; niin;
Wings. ; ; 18+ in.
Wings ро Я bewnd a ; ; 4 in.

First and third of primary wing- Heathers er same leno

Mr. Frohawk writes further that this is undoubtedly a typical bean - goose
(4. segetum) with abnormal colouring of the bill. In considering this bird a bean-
goose my correspondent is certainly right; the figure of the head showing all the
characteristics of the species in question. As to the reasons for considering it abnormal,
we should bear in mind that very few of the observers who have had in their hands
bean-geese immediately after death, have directed their attention to the tint of the
colouring of the band. Geese with such colouring have been handled by competent
observers, in many cases some time after death, when it may be admitted that the
colouring would have already more or less changed. Further, it should be kept in view
that on the whole, as already said, М. segetum is far less numerous than the yellow-
billed goose, and old bean-geese, judging, at any rate, by their almost complete absence
from even large collections, are very rare; this last circumstance being explained by
the fact that old birds are generally aes in much less numbers than the less wary
individuals.

Moreover, I may once more remark that the number of teeth in the genus
Melanonyx apparently increases with age, so that those rudiments of teeth which in young
birds may easily escape attention, as years go on attain considerable development and
become easily noticeable. At present I can only say that my examinations of dried skins
have almost convinced me of the variability in the number of teeth in geese of the genus
Melanonyx with age, although I may note that in two or three cases ТГ have come across
facts apparently contradictory to this hypothesis. In order to confirm or disprove the
supposition that the number of teeth may increase within certain limits with years,
investigations should be conducted with live birds kept in captivity, by counting the
teeth every year in the same individuals; and the directors of zoological gardens might
come to the assistance of science on this point.

From these and other considerations, and seeing the complete identity in all
respects save the vermilion band on the bill of the goose represented in Mr. Frohawk’s
sketch with typical bean-geese, I cannot avoid expressing my conviction that in all fully
adult or, at any rate, old bean-geese the bill is normally not yellow-orange but either
vermilion-rose or flesh-colour of various tints.

At the same time, I may direct the attention of the reader to the fact that this
R

122 Geese of Europe and Asia

vermilion colour in the figure of the bill sent me by Mr. Frohawk has nothing in
common with the pure rose or rose-flesh colouring of the band on the bills of М. bvachy-
rhynchus ог М. neglectus.

I may add, as the result of a verbal communication from the author, that the
bean-goose recorded by Mr. А. P. Semenov in Privoda Okhota for 1898 from the Ryazan
Government had a pale flesh-coloured band on the bill and yellow feet, so that in all
probability it belonged to this same JZ. carnetirostris, and not to М. brachyrhynchus, as
Mr. Semenov at first supposed.

| To my great regret, this example was not preserved. ‘The fact, however, that the
Specimen (a very small one) was shot from a flock simultaneously with a typical bean-goose
is, in my opinion, favourable to the supposition that between М. carnetrostris and М. segetum
no specific difference exists, but that we have to do either with a case of age, dimorphism,
or a mere individual peculiarity.

This view is supported by the fact that a similar variation occurs in the East
Siberian form of the bean-goose (7. segetum serrivostris), three examples of which,
collected by Mr. Sokolnikov in the Anadyr region, were sent to me for examination by
Professor Menzbier.

On the labels of these skins Mr. Sokolnikov has noted that the bands on the bills
were of a dark flesh-colour, and therefore the specimens were inscribed “ Novaia Zemlia
goose. Further notes on these specimens appear later; but seeing that, with the exception
of the colouring of the bill of the Novaia Zemlia bean-geese, I can find in von Heuglin’s
account no difference from the ordinary М. segetum, I consider it superfluous to quote the
description given by this author, which would merely encumber a work already somewhat
heavy reading.

Having expressed my conviction that AZ. carnetrostris is apparently a mere synonym
for the bean-goose, I may add that Iam not entitled to assert that this opinion is incon-
trovertible. It may be—although I am personally disinclined to admit it—that further
investigations will show that I am mistaken; but at present I have nothing definite in
favour of the supposition that there exists a distinct species of Novaia Zemlia goose.

THE EASTERN BEAN-GOOSE
МЕГАМОМУХ SEGETUM SERRIROSTRIS, SWINHOE
Plate 12

English—Lastern Bean-Goose.

Russian—Gus pashenny (Maak); ? bolshot gumennitk (Yakutsk, ¢este Maak, probably con-
founded with Ellon Middendorff’s goose); ?folevot or ?chernevot виз! (асс.
Yablonsky, for Barnaul, where, probably, М. avvensts and М. segetum serrirostris
-are confounded under these names); gumennik dlinnoklyuvy and folstoklyuvy
(Buturlin); ewmenntk and atki gus (of sportsmen).

German—Szbirische Saat-Gans.

Anser segetum, Middendorff (partim) (nec Gmelin), Sib. R., ii. p. 227 (1851); Schrenck, Reis. Amur-L., р. 463
(1860); Swinhoe, Ibis, 1860, р. 67— 1861, р. 344—1862, р. 253; Radde, Reis. 5.-О. Sib, И. р. 356
(1863); Taczanowski, Faune Orn. Sib. or, р. 1095 (1893); David and Oust., Ois. Chine, р. 491 (1877);
Dybowski and Taczanowski, Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 1884, p. 147.

Anser serrivostris (Gould, MS.), Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Миз., xxvii. р. 101 (1895); Seebohm, Ibis, 1884,
p. 269; Oates, Man. Game Birds of India, ii. p. 76; Hume and Marshall, Game Birds of India,
lil, рр. 67—69 (1880); Buturlin, Diki Gusi Ross. Imp. (Psov. i Ruzh. Okh., 1901); zd, separ.,
р. 45 (1901).

Anser segetum, var. serrtrostris, Swinhoe, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1871 (China); Dybowski, J. Е Orn. р. 108
(1873); Buturlin, Tabl. opr. Plastinchatokl. (Psov. i Ruzh. Okh., 1900); 24%, sep., р. 8; Macpherson,
History of Fowling, 1897, p. 228.

Anser segetum serrtrostris, Stejneger, Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., No. 29, р. 144 (1885); Seebohm, Hist. Brit. Birds,
lil. р. 494 (1885); 24, Birds of Jap. Empire, ii. p. 236 (partim) (1890); Buturlin, Sinopt. Tabl. ОКВ. Pt.
Ross. Imp., p. 44 (1901).

? Anser segetum middendorffic (Sev.), Nikolsky (partim ?), Sakhalin i yego Е. Pozv., р. 224 (an. mentalis,
Oates ; longet. ung. maxillae = 22 mm.!), 1889.

ADULT BIRDS

I can discover absolutely no difference in the colouring of the plumage of the East
Siberian variety as compared with the typical bean-goose; and only the greater size of the
whole bird, and the longer and more massive bill, distinguish the former from the latter.
Further, although I have not noticed any white feathering along the base of the upper
mandible, on the very tip of the chin, or a little short of it, there occur in some examples
separate white plumules forming an irregular spot.

A dark or light rufous tint on the head is frequently met with, as in М. arvensis
stbtvicus ; but a yellowish or light bay tint, which is not rare in the latter, I have not once seen
in the goose under description. Judging by the few specimens, which I consider females, these

1 Chernevoi, from breeding in the “chern” or “taiga,” according to Yablonsky.
£23

124 Geese of Europe and Asia

yield to the males in size, and the bill in these does not attain the massiveness characteristic
of old ganders. Unfortunately, I have to make all these statements from inadequate
material, and it is quite probable that the variations in the colouring and dimensions of the
goose are really much more considerable.

YouNnG MALE

A young male with culmen 59 mm. (=2.32 in.), and depth of lower mandible
10.5 mm. (=0.41 in.) in the thickest place (bill shut), from Mongolia (river Etyr), is
distinguished in nowise as regards colouring from the adults, and is probably а two-
year-old bird.

I know nothing of young birds in first plumage or of the young in down.

DIMENSIONS OF ADULT BIRDS OF BOTH SEXES

Total length . | 776—825 mm. (= 30.50—32.40 in.).
Wing . ; ' | 425—450 mm. (= 16.70—17.70 in.)
Culmen 62—72 mm. ( = 2.44—2.83 in.).
Greatest depth of Hones ancl rate Shue ite. 10-12 mm. (=0.39—0.47 in.).
Tarsus . 73—85 mm. (= 2.78—3.34 in.)
Length of median aie и ne 71—75 mm. (= 2.79-2.95 in.).

Number of teeth on each side of upper авы 20—25.

I here give a table of bill-measurements in several specimens :—

1 д mber of

Sa В. Visible oe — pee Е onside of upper

“uk Opa. (ог) РОН (= 0.30.10) 20 Barnaul, from Prof. М. Е. Kashchenko.

3 62 ” = 2.44 5, ) Il ” (= 0-43 55 ) 20 9

р ЕЕ) 2 ВА мо 20 Sakhalin, Coll. of Zool. Mus.,St. Petersburg.
29 Е ЕЕ, Оо 20 Chukchiland, 5 33

24 72 55 (= 2.83 a) 12 ” (=0.47 , ) 20

а оо р ye ОЕ) 20 Japan? (or China ?).

re) 65 5 (=2.55 5) II и OA ey) 21 Yakutsk, Coll. of Prof. M. A. oui

The dimensions of this goose (first separated by Gould (MS.) under the name of
Ч изе’ servivostvis, but described subsequently by Swinhoe) apparently show a con-
siderable increase as we approach the East, this being particularly the case, as it seems
to me, in regard to the massiveness of the bill.

In view of the fact that the chief character distinguishing this Oriental form of
bean-goose from the Western type is the bill, I dwell in somewhat greater detail on the
description of this part.

While the bill of adults of the typical MW. segetum never apparently exceeds
61 mm. (=2.36 in.) in length, that of the Eastern form (М. serrtvostris) varies in culmen-
length between 62 and 72 mm. (=2.44—2.83 in.).

Still more striking than its length is the thickness, or massiveness, of the bill, which
is shown in the size and strength of the nails on both mandibles, and in the depth,
or thickness, of the lower one. Although this last character, first noted by Mr. Oates,
undoubtedly much facilitates the discrimination of the different species and varieties of the
genus Melanonyx, even on cursory inspection, yet this is only seen by comparing it with the

Eastern Bean-Goose 125

other dimensions and the structure of the bill, and it cannot in any wise be regarded as a
decisive and important character. As we have already seen when describing the typical bean-
goose, the bill, with a culmen-length never exceeding 62 mm. (=2.44 in.),! has a greatest
depth of the visible part of the lower mandible (with shut bill) of from 74 to 9.2 mm.
(=0.29—0.36 in.). The bill of the Siberian form (М. segetum serrirostris), on the other
hand, varies in length between 62 and 72 mm. (=2.44—2.83 in.), and has a maximum depth
of lower mandible, under like conditions, of from 10 to 12 mm. (=0.39—0.47 in.), but
oftener between 11 and 12.

As in the typical М. segetwm, so in the race now described, the number of teeth on
each side of the upper mandible usually varies from 20 to 21; and I once thought that this
was the limit, but, as we shall see at the end of this notice, this number is sometimes increased
to 25, so that in this case also I am confirmed in my view that the number of teeth in this
group of geese is not constant.

Although the arrangement of the black and light areas on the bill is absolutely the
same as in the typical form, I have not seen in М. segetum serrivostris the colouring
extending backwards beyond the anterior margins of the nasal depressions, which occasion-
ally happens in the typical bean-goose. With the exception of this light ring, embracing
both mandibles in the apical part, the whole bill is black.

Plate 23 shows clearly the difference in size and stoutness of the bills of both forms
of this goose, while below are figured side by side the upper mandibles of both. This

М. segetum, $ И. segetum serrirostris, & М. segetum mentalts (?!). Туре.
Culmen 594 mm. Culmen 69 mm. Culmen 72 mm.
(Europe. ) (East Siberia.) Japan (Brit. Mus.).

comparison is necessary, because /М. mentalts has a bill closely resembling in structure those
of the other two bean-geese; and in all probability that form will prove to be nothing more
than a large type of 7. segetum serrirostris, as is mentioned in the sequel.

1 I have not myself seen an example with culmen exceeding 61 mm. (=2.40 in.); but as Dr. Madarasz speaks of one with

62 mm. (=2.44 in.), I think this size may have been the result of measuring the bill along the arc, and not the chord as I have
always done.

126 Geese of Europe and Asia

(GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

_Ifit be assumed, as I hold to be the case, that all the statements in regard to the
bean-goose of East Siberia made by Messrs. Middendorff, Schrenck, Maak, Radde, and
Taczanowski refer to 17. segetum serrirostris,: it may be safely said that the latter ©0056
occurs throughout Siberia to the east of 80° W. long., breeding both in the whole tundra of
the northern part of the country from the Yenisei to Chukchiland inclusive, and in the taiga
considerably farther south than anywhere in the west, where J/. segetum nests. We know,
for instance, that it breeds both on the Stanovoi range and on the island of Shantar ; and if
it does not nest, but only halts, on passage in Sakhalin, this can only be in consequence of
the absence of suitable spots on the latter island. On the western limit of its range, to the
north of Barnaul, where probably (together with М. avvensis) it is known under the name
of “chernevoi gus,” it appears to descend much farther south than the western breeding-
area of MZ. segetum.

То fix the southern boundary of the breeding-grounds in Siberia of ЛМ. segetum
serrivostris is at present impossible, and doubtless some considerable time must elapse before
this can be ascertained. If I consider that the form of М. segetum which authors speak of
as the East Siberian bird belongs to 56777054715, and not to the typical race, I do so merely
on the ground that I have not seen a single typical bean-goose from localities lying east-
ward of Lake Baikal, notwithstanding the considerable amount of material I have examined
from those parts. If, nevertheless, it should turn out that this is a mere chance, and that
typical bean-geese both breed and are met with in great numbers in East Siberia (as
stated by many writers), it would then probably be necessary to recognise MV. serrvivostris
as an independent species. ‘То form any opinion based on our present imperfect informa-
tion, without a single specimen to confirm it, would, however, scarcely be in accordance
with scientific procedure. In winter М. segetum serrirostris descends into China, Korea,
and Japan, and, according to the missionary Abbé Armand David, is in winter more
numerous in China than all other geese taken together. On the return passage in spring it
sometimes even alights in the city of Peking itself.

In view of the scantiness of our information regarding the Siberian bean-goose, the
following notices from various writers which seem to refer to this bird may be quoted.
Maak says: “On April 24 I saw the first pair on the Lena, 430 versts above the
Yakutsk. Afterwards I saw large flocks on the Lunkha (60° N. lat.) during the whole of
May, and on the Vilyui even on June 6; they were flying in a north-westerly direction.
They never alighted on the Lunkha; but about the mouth of the Vilyui, from the latter days
of April till May го, they might be seen in thousands on the shoals. They often breed
round lakes of. the Vilyui basin, far removed from human habitation. Here moulting
continued till July 25, on which day I no longer noticed any geese of this species on
the wing.” While on the Khaingia (65° зо’ М. lat.) I often saw bean-geese that had
only just finished moulting, circling and flying in all possible directions. They began to
leave the Khaingia on August 19, flying $. and S.W.; the last and most numerous
skeins of migrating birds of this species I saw on September 13 on the Eyakita
(67° N. lat.).

1 Middendorff’s statement may partly refer to the yellow bill of М. arvensis, as 1 have already pointed out in the notice of that

species.
2 Maak calls it 4. segetum.

Eastern Bean-Goose 127

‘‘ According to the observations of Pavlovsky, who saw the last birds of this species
on September 25 on the Yegetta (64° №. lat.), their departure commenced on September 2,
on the Markha, at the mouth of the Khaingia (65° N. lat.). |

“Near the town of Nerchinsk, these geese were killed оп May 1, in the valley of
the Shilka, at the Shilka works; and I saw hundreds of skeins, during a slight shower,
flying high or low over the river. The last flocks I saw at the Shilka works on May 17,
when they were flying N. and N.N.W.”

As to Middendorff’s statement concerning М. segetum on the Taimyr peninsula, it is
evident, as already said, that it must in part refer to the typical yellow-billed М. arvensis,
and in part to М. segetum serrivostris. As the Taimyr peninsula is a vast tract, it is quite
probable that in various parts of it there may breed the typical yellow-billed, Middendorff's
goose, and the species here described ; while in the more westerly portion of this peninsula
it is possible (although not probable) that the typical bean-goose may occur. To clear this
up will require time and careful determination, and until this is done there is no possibility
_ of saying anything definite with regard to the geese of this great region.

Middendorff observes that /М. segefum nests throughout the Taimyr tundras, and
that it appeared soon after April 14 on the Boganida (70° N. lat.). Оп July т he
found in 74° N. latitude a nest with four eggs partly incubated, which were subsequently
eaten by a skua (Lestrvzs fomarina). The nest, which consisted of a hollow in the top of a
grassy tussock about two feet high, on the bank of the river itself, was lined with stems of
last year’s weeds, and a small quantity of down. On July 17 these geese on Taimyr
began to moult, and as late аз July 26 countless gaggles were seen in moult. Ву the
end of July the majority had finished moulting, and on August 8 small groups of
from three to seven birds were to be seen, which were called by the natives деи (parents),
consisting of birds of both sexes. About this time fully fledged geese were continually
making for the sea in vast flocks.

Middendorff adds that these geese are also met with in the south-east, and that
they were noticed for the first time at Anginsk on April 23. Somewhat later, large
flocks appeared. The species breeds on the Stanovoi range, as also on the island of
Shantar. On August 30 the first gageles returned to the shore of the Okhotsk Sea,
where they halted, and remained as late as September 19 in enormous flocks, which,
far away from water, fed exclusively on bilberries.

After the present notice was finished, I received from Professor М. A. Menzbier, in
January 1903, several goose-skins collected by Mr. Sokolnikov in the Anadyr district, three
of which are very interesting and at first greatly puzzled me. Owing to the inscriptions on
their labels, I did not at once recognise them as Siberian bean-geese. As a matter of fact,
in the conformation of the bill and in all its dimensions, these three geese agree exactly with
М. segetum serrivostris; whereas on the labels it is stated that the band on the bill is
“dark flesh-colour,’ and the feet “orange.” Moreover, as Мг. Sokolnikov marks these
birds as from Novaia Zemlia, they seemed to correspond with what М. carnetrostris of
Buturlin ought to be, according to the description.

We have, however, already seen in the notice of that species that it was based on notes
alone, and that, after careful consideration of the question, I was unable to recognise the
specific distinctness of the “ Novaia Zemlia bean-goose,” and regarded it merely as a
dimorphous form of Melanonyx segetum. Moreover, in addition to the aforesaid dark

128 Geese of Europe and Asia

flesh-colouring of the band on the bill, the number of teeth on each side of the upper
mandible proved to exceed that in all the specimens of М. segetum serrirostris 1 had
previously seen, in which they varied from 20 to 26.

Below is given a table of the chief characters of these three Anadyr geese, sufficient for
comparison with the specimens of М. segetum serrirostris examined by myself.

From this my first idea was that these skins might belong to young individuals of
М. mentalis of Oates,’ a goose as yet but little known, and of which the type specimen in
the British Museum has the whole chin white. This seemed the more probable from the
fact that the number of teeth on the sides of the upper mandible of the Anadyr specimens,
amounting in two cases to 25, was the same as in М. mentfalts.

Greatest Proportion of
thickness of Ss = nail of upper
Culmen. lower mana teeth on ae te ЕКО Wing. Remarks.
Е bill, ae ee a seer culmen.
mm. in. mm. Ш. mm. in.
ee a ee No. т 915 69.43 22—23 34 Ио г оп bill м as in all
adult, but not old. . 569. Serrirostris, but of dark
May 29, 1902. Post flesh - colour. Feet orange.
Novomariinsky. An- Belly very white. No white
adyr district. feathering on chin. At base of
bill, above and laterally, several
light featherlets.

Label of skin, No. 249. | 65 = 2.55 ee One 25—25 34 somewhat | Colour of band not stated, but
$ adult, but not old. shorter as label is marked “ Novaia
June 7, 1902. bid. Zemlia goose,” it evidently was
dark flesh-colour. Оп chin,
large white patch. Feet orange.
Вас Мо, 210. 9 ПО 65-72-55 Ао 24-25 34 somewhat | Band on bill “ dark flesh-colour” ;
old. 2 shorter almost whole of apical part of

May 29, 1902. 1014. chin white. Feet orange.

=

Again, the dark flesh-colour of the band on the bills suggested the idea that this
might be normal for the thick-billed goose (AV. menfalis), which had been little studied in
this respect, especially since in М. segetum serrirostris the bill is always described as yellow-
orange, as indeed it is in the specimens in collections.

It is true, indeed, that in the three specimens of М. mentalis of which there is any
description at all, there is not only a light band on the bill, but the light colour extends more
or less irregularly back under the nostrils—a feature I have never noticed in М. serrirostris.
This must accordingly be kept in view, as it suggests another conclusion which is referred to
in the section on М. мешай.

I repeat, then, that when all this information was in my hands, and I received from
Mr. Frohawk a sketch of the bill of a red-rose-billed bean-goose killed in Holland, I thought
that it would be impossible to solve the puzzle without new and abundant material ; but,
little by little, by thinking over the question day and night, the whole difficulty began to
clear up.

Still earlier, when I received from Mr. Buturlin the Kolguev bean-geese with 25
teeth on each side of the upper mandible, I realised that in that species the number of teeth
was not limited (as I formerly thought) to 21, but normally varied between 20 and 25.

Almost at the same time I received from Mr. Frohawk the information that in
М. brachyrhynchus there sometimes occur 25 instead of the presumed 20-21 teeth; and

1 See next section.

Eastern Bean-Goose 12 9

accordingly the number of teeth (25) in the bean-goose (with vermilion band) killed by
Mr. Pike in Holland offered no obstacle to my assigning it to ЛМ. segetum.

All this taken together removed any doubt as to assigning the Anadyr specimens
of bean-geese to the eastern ЛМ. segetum serrivostris; and I arrived at the conviction that a
slight dimorphism (limited in this case to the ое of the band on the bill), analogous
to that existing in the typical western /М. segetum, occurs also in the eastern representative
of the species, ЛМ. segetum serrirostris, which beyond considerably larger dimensions
(especially of the bill) does not differ essentially from the former.

Even the white patches at the mental angle, met with in the Anadyr examples
(in two of those brought by Sokolnikov), do not offer anything remarkable, since we have
seen that such occur also in typical bean-geese, as shown in Mr. Buturlin’s collection
from Kolguev. The presence of white plumules, in greater or less number, in some
specimens both of the Western and the Eastern Siberian bean-geese is indeed a very
strong argument against the distinctness of yet another goose, namely, the thick-billed
Melanonyx mentalis of Oates.

Indeed, once we are compelled to reject as worthless the character of “white chin”
in the thick-billed goose, we are left only one specific feature—the unusual massiveness
of the bill, which is mainly expressed by the great depth of the lower mandible.

Not having, however, at present, the right to absolutely reject the specific distinctness
of the thick-billed goose, I pass on to record its alleged distinctive features and such
facts as are known concerning its distribution.

ТЕТЕ: TICK BILLED. СООЬЕ

MELANONYX MENTALIS, OATES
Plate 13

Beloborody and Yafonsky gus (Buturlin) ; Klynvasty gus (Alphéraky).
English—TZhe Thick-billed Goose.

Anser mentalis, Oates, Man. Game Birds of India, ii. р. 77 (1899).

Anser (Melanonyx) mentalis, Buturlin, “ Psovaya i Ruzh. Okh.,” 1901 (Feb.-April) ; 24, Dikie Сия Ross. Imp.,
separ. тоог. |

Anser mentatis, Buturlin, Sinopt. tabl. Okhotn. Pt. Ross. Imp., р. 42 (1901); Bianchi, Yezhegodnik Zool. Мил.
Imp. Ak. N., 1902, vol. vii, No. 3, р. xvi.

Anser segetum middendorffi, Stejneger, Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. No. 29 (1885), р. 142, pl. vii. fig. г (rostrum);
(2) Nikolsky, Sakhalin i yego fauna, р. 224 (1889).

Anser grandis, Przewalski (пес Pallas), Mongoliya i strana Tangutov, ii. р. 150 (1876).

ADULT BIRDS

Size very large. Plumage similar to that of М. segetum serrirostris or М. arvensis:
the only specimen which I have been able to examine differing in nowise in colouring from
the large yellow-billed species. No white margin round base of upper mandible, but in
one example from Northern Manchuria (Inkow) a small light spot on very top of forehead.

The main difference between this goose and the other representatives of the genus
Melanonyx consists in the extraordinary thickness or stoutness of the bill and in particular
of the lower mandible, so clearly shown in the plate of bills.

In the original specimen which served Mr. Oates for the description of this goose
the whole chin was pure white; but neither in the example in the Zoological Museum at
st. Petersburg nor in a second from Bering Island, whose bill (under another name) is
figured by Mr. Stejneger, does the chin show any white. On this point I may note once
more that in two specimens of Melanonyx segetum brought in 1902 by Mr. Buturlin from
Kolguev, the chin has a large white patch, which clearly indicates the instability of this
character, and consequently its worthlessness for discriminating species.

Total length д ee cue 850 mm. (= 33.40 in.).

Wing . ; : 495-4974 mm. (= 19.40—-19.50 in.).
Culmen ; . 694-75 mm. (= 2.73—2.95 in.).

Bill from гаре . ; : : : 71—72 (= 2.79—2.83 in.).

Depth of bill at Базе . , 40-414 mm. (= 1.57—1.63 in.).
Greatest depth of lower Forel wai ith cin bill 13-154 mm. (=0.51-0.61 in.).
Tarsus ; ; ; ; g6—100 mm, (= 3.77—3.93 in.).
Median digit with ane | 93 mm. (= 3.66 in.) (in one example).
Its claw 15 mm. (= 59 in.).

Number of teeth on once 50 of upper marae 20—25 (aan three examples).
130

Тыск-6ШеЯ Goose 131

To this description and dimensions I may add the following remarks: In the
first place I direct attention to the fact that in the three specimens of this goose at
present known to me, the yellow or orange colouring (or perhaps dark-flesh) forms not
only a broad ring embracing both mandibles in the apical portion, but stretches more or less
far backwards, under the nostrils, in irregular patches, in a manner I have not once observed
in either AZ. segetum serrirostris or М. arvensis sibiricus.

Secondly, although the proportion of the nail as seen from above to the total length
of the culmen in the specimen in the British Museum and in the male from Bering Island
is the same as in AZ. segetum serrirostris (¢.e. the nail is contained in the total length of the
culmen 3% times), in the example from Northern Manchuria the nail is somewhat shorter
and more rounded and occupies only a little less than one-fourth of the total length of the
culmen, so that in form and relative size it somewhat approaches М. arvensis sibiricus.

Lastly, while the number of teeth in the example from Japan and in the Manchurian
specimen is 25, Stejneger definitely states that in the male from Bering Island the number
was 20, or that which is most commonly met with in М. segetum serrirostrts.

On the strength of these three specimens it would seem, then, that the characters
of the bill in AZ. меш ай5 are not constant.

At first these considerations led me to think that perhaps we have to do with
hybrids between ЛИ. segetum serrirostris and М. arvensis sibiricus, although Т thought
it could not be admitted that the crossing of the former with the long-billed М. arvensis
stbivicus would yield a breed with such a large and massive bill as is seen in the thick-
billed goose.

Now, however, on the grounds stated at the end of the notice on the Siberian
bean-goose, I have almost abandoned this hypothesis, and am rather inclined to see in
these thick-billed geese only very old individuals of the Siberian bean-goose which have
reached the limit of their growth. I even think that perhaps all such thick-billed geese
will prove to be exceptionally old ganders of this species.

The question, then, as to whether М. mentalis constitutes an independent species
or only a large form of the Siberian bean-goose still remains open.

Mr. Oates writes as follows on this goose: “Оп looking over the geese in the
British Museum, I was struck by the large size of one of the specimens, its massive
bill and white chin. It came from Yokohama, and was once in the Seebohm Collection.
I can only regard this goose as a species which has not before been noticed, and I -
accordingly give it a distinguishing name. . . . There is nothing on the label of the
specimen to show what the colour of the bill and legs was in life.”

I may add that I have previously pointed out that one of the characters given by
Mr. Oates, namely, the white chin, is not distinctive of this goose; so. that beyond the
massiveness of the bill and the great dimensions of the bird itself there are no sufficient
characters to justify its right to specific independence.

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

At present we know for certain three countries where the thick-billed goose has
been found, namely, Japan, Bering Island (in the Komandor group), and Inkow in
Northern Manchuria, where the example now preserved in the musetm of the St.
Petersburg Academy of Science was obtained on February 27, 1901.

132 Geese of Europe and Asia

Although I have already expressed my opinion that this type is probably not an inde-
pendent species, but is based either on large individuals of Siberian bean-geese or perhaps
on crosses of the latter with AZ. arvensis stbtrvicus, it is still possible that I am mistaken and
that new observations and new material will lead to a different conclusion. Thus, for
example, there is a passage in the writings of the late Colonel Przewalski which apparently
refers to this goose.

This is what the Asiatic explorer writes: ‘This species (duser grandis, Pallas) was
noticed by us in small numbers in the spring of 1871 on Dalai-nor, and in April of the next
year on the flooded fields in the valley of the Khuan-khe. Although we did not succeed
in getting a single specimen, yet from their larger size and particularly deep note, it was
possible to distinguish even at a distance these geese from user segetum.

“On Lake Khanka 4. grandis is very common during the spring migration, which
begins about the middle of March and continues to the middle of April. These geese
always keep in pairs or small flocks (3 to 7 individuals), generally not mixing with other
species, than which they are far more wary.” Few pairs remain, however, to breed in the
Khanka basin, the rest retiring at that season to the more remote lakes.”

Przewalski evidently knew both the Siberian bean-goose (which he called „Я. segetum)
and Middendorff’s goose (М. avvensts stbirvicus), and we gather from his words that the species
he described was not the latter. On the other hand, he was also well acquainted with the
“ swan-goose,” so that the passage quoted above evidently refers to some large Меапопух,
possibly М. mentalis. It is a pity that the famous traveller did not secure a specimen of
this big bird.

This is all that I can glean with regard to М. mentalis. The figure was drawn by
Mr. Frohawk from the specimen in the British Museum, which served Mr. Oates as the
type of this at present doubtful species.

1 Evidently not, as we now know that under this name Pallas could only mean domesticated swan-geese (Cygnopsis cygnotdes).

2 That the flocks are small and keep apart is in favour of the supposition that they consist of old males, as is a trait of many
animals, for the old males in old age keep aloof from their juniors. |

Genus Lulabeta, Reichenbach (1852)

ALONG each side of the dark neck runs a broad white streak. Bill slender, entirely

light (yellow), with black nails. Upper nail included in total length of bill not less than
four times. (Adult birds.)

qed А Не ЕЕ
ЕОГАВЕТА INDICA, LATHAM
Ра A

Indusky gus; gorny and indeisky gus (Przewalski); Turkestansky gus (Buturlin) ; Mongolsky
gus (in Minusinsk district, ¢este Dr. Sushkin, although it does not apparently here
ascend to the north of the Mongolian frontier). |

English—Larred-headed or Bar-headed Goose.

Anas tndica, Latham, Indian Ornithol., p. 839 (1790).
Anser undulata, Bonnaterre, Encyclop. Méthod., i. р. 114 (1790).
Anser melanocephalus, Vieill. xxiii. p. 332 (1818).
Anser indica, Stephens, Gen. Zool. xii. 2. р. 36 (1824).
Anser tndicus, Sykes, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1831, р. 125; Hume and Marshall, Game Birds of India, iii. р. 81,
| pl. 12 (1880); Severtsov, Ibis, 1883, р. 76; Sclater, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1886, р. 320; Pleske, Th.,
Rev. Turkest. Ornis., р. 54 (1888); Przewalski, Mong. strana Tang,, ii. р. 151 (1876); zd, III. Putesh.
Tsentr. Az., р. 398 (with sketch), (1883) ; 24., [V. Putesh. Tsentr. Az., р. 327 (1888); Buturlin, Opredel.
Plastinchatokl. (“ Psov. 1 Ruzh. Okhota,” 1900); zd, separ., р. 7; zd., Dikie Gusi Ross, Imp. (“ Psov. 1
Ruzh, Okhota,” 1901) ; 24, separ., р. 21 (Еиабега); г4., Sinoptich. tabl. ОКВ. Pt. Ross. Imp., р. 42 (тоот):
Alphéraky, Kuldzha i Tian-shan, рр. 145 and 165 (1901); Taczanowski, Faune Orn. Sib. Orient., p.
1087 (1893); Oates, Man. Game Birds of India, ii. p. 59 (1899); Pleske, Th., Orn. Ausb. Exp. Gebr.
Grum-Grz., in Mél. Biol. xiii. pt. 2. p. 27 (1892); Grum-Grzymailo, Pat. Zapadn. Kitai, 1. р. 520 (1896);
Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus., xxvii. p. 105 (1895); Blanford, Fauna Brit. India, Birds, iv. p. 419
(1898); Finn, How to Know the Ind. Ducks, Calcutta, 1901, p. 21.
Bernicla indica, Grey, Cat. Birds, Ш. р. 608, по. 15 (1844). ;
Eulabera imdica, Reichenbach, Av. Syst. Nat. р. ix. (1852); Taczanowski, Bull. Soc. Zool, ii. р. 43 (Baikal)
(1877).
Eulabeta indica, Bonaparte, Compt.-Rendus, xliii. p. 648 (1856).
Ещафега indicus, Ball, Stray Feathers, 1874, р. 436.
Anser skorniakovt, Severtsov, Vertik. i Goriz. Raspr. Turk. Zh., р. 148, pl. то, figs. 3, 4 (adult and young in down)
м | f-Orn.-1 373, pp. 340,377, 380 1875, рр, РОО 84.
Ешайа, Newton, Dict. of Birds, р. 374 (1894).

ADULT MALE

Head and a broad longitudinal streak on sides of neck, white: black bar traversing

hind part of occiput, reaching with its extremities to eyes; another shorter transverse black bar
133

134 Geese of Europe and Asia

crosses nape. Anterior part of neck, from lower portion of white throat, brownish grey, this
colour gradually becoming paler and changing into the grey of breast, the feathers of which
show whitish edgings. Under-parts and lower tail-coverts white. Flanks pale brown, with
subterminal portions of feathers light rufous, and their extreme tips whitish. Back of neck о
brown-grey, gradually becoming paler as it mingles with upper part of back. Sides of
breast, middle of back, and shoulders grey; each feather, passing towards the extremity into
brownish grey, with a whitish tip. Rump bluish grey; upper tail-coverts white (sometimes
with greyish tint). Tail feathers grey, with white edgings, and broad white tips. Upper
wing-coverts, under side of wing, and axillaries uniform light bluish grey. Outer primaries
grey with blackish tips; inner primaries and secondaries wholly blackish, latter with narrow
whitish edgings. Tertiaries greyish brown.

ADULT FEMALE

Generally similar in plumage to gander, but considerably inferior in size and weight.

Younc BIRDS

Forehead, sides of head and neck, chin, throat, and top of neck anteriorly white;
occiput, nape, and hind part of neck dark brown; lower part of fore-neck dark grey. Upper
and under surfaces of body more uniform in colour than in adults, and almost without signs
of transverse bars ог of light tips to feathers.

GOSLING (ABOUT THREE MONTHS)

According to Mr. Hume: “Ц differs from the adult altogether in the head and neck
markings. The bill is, as in the adult, yellow, but with the nail deep brown; the legs and
feet appear to have been a brownish orange; the forehead is brownish white, a little tinged ©
with rusty; there is a dusky line through the lores to the eyes; the whole crown, occiput,
and nape is a sooty or dusky black; below this the back of the neck is wood-brown, and
the sides and front of the lower part of the neck are pale dusky greyish, mottled with
whitish, this being the colour of the tips of the feathers ; most of the feathers of the breast
and abdomen and lower parts generally have a pale, rusty, or fulvous tinge towards the
tips ; the conspicuous dark banding of the flanks is almost entirely wanting, only one dark
greyish brown feather on each side having as yet made its appearance.

“There is no trace either of the two distinct black head-bars or of the conspicuous
white neck-streak, so that the head and neck look strangely unlike those of the adult.

“The tail is rather browner than in the old bird.”

YOUNG IN Down

Pale yellowish ; top of head and upper surface of body light brown.*

In regard to the dimensions and weight of the birds and the colouring of the soft-
parts, and other details, I quote largely from Mr. Hume; the more readily since it is unlikely
that anyone else has had the opportunity of examining so many specimens of this species,

1 In the drawing of the young in down, given by Severtsov in his Vertik. ¢ Gordz. raspr. Turk. Zhiv., pl. то, fig. 4, two black transverse
bars are shown on the head as characteristic for adult. birds, and in the text it is said (р. 148) that ‘in it the speckling of the head and
neck is already marked,” and yet in one bird ‘the feather shafts were hardly yet pushing through.” How to harmonise this statement of
Severtsov’s with the above-quoted description of a three months’ gosling by Mr. Hume, I am completely at a loss.

_ Ваг-Беа4е4 Goose ВоВ

ог has devoted so much care and observation to the investigation. “Т have measured and
weighed,” he writes, “а very large series of this species. The males average appreciably
larger than the females of the same age, but they take some years to attain their maximum
dimensions and weight, and many females are, therefore, as large or larger than many males,

and it seems therefore useless to give the dimensions of the two sexes separately. Apparent
adults varied as follows :—

Теа». : 698—850 mm. ( = 27.50—33.50 in.).
Ехрапзе 1422—1676 mm. (= 56—66 in.).
Wing . ' ; 406—482 mm. (= 16-19 in.).
Tail from vent . 127-177 mm. (= 5—7 in.).
Tarsus . é 52-76 mm. (= 2.50—3.30 in.).
Culmen . | 48.2—58.5 mm. (= I1.90—2.40 in.) (my measurements).
Bill from gape : 45—58.5 mm. (= 1.80—2.30 in.).
Greatest depth, lower mandible, shut bill . 4 mm. (=0.15 in.) (my measurement),

Number of teeth, each side, upper mandible, 26—27.
Weight, 4—6 lbs. 14 oz.

“T have weighed, I find, more than a hundred; but I have never obtained one
weighing quite 7 Ibs., yet Jerdon gives the weight as 7 lbs. to 8 Ibs. Only two of my
specimens exceeded 6 lbs. 8 02. The great majority are less than 6 lbs.

“The legs and feet are bright orange, sometimes paler, occasionally only yellow;
claws horny black; the irides deep brown; the bill orangey-yellow to orange, rarely only
pale lemon-yellow, often paler or greenish towards the nostrils; the nail black or blackish.

“There is a prominent tubercle nearly half an inch long in old males, just below the
carpal joint, varying in dimensions according to sex and age, but always more prominent
than in the grey-lag and other geese already mentioned.”

I have examined the bills of several Central Asian specimens and convinced myself:

Firstly, that the length of the nail of the upper mandible is contained more than
4 times in the total length of the culmen, seen from above ;

Secondly, that the depth of the deepest part of the lower mandible with shut bill was
ао. та. (= 0.15 №. i and,

Thirdly, that the number of teeth on each side of the upper mandible, judging from
the shut bill, was 26-27.

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

Central Asia in summer and the whole of India in the winter—this is, in broad
outline, the range of this species, which is evidently not extensive.

If we examine in greatest detail the limits within which the bar-headed goose has
hitherto been found, by drawing a straight line from Lake Baikal to the eastern angle of
Koko-Nor and thence continuing it along the eastern portion of Assam and Burma to the
Indian Ocean, we shall obtain the approximate boundary, to the east of which this species
has not hitherto been observed. It seems, however, very probable that this goose will yet
be found wintering in the southern part of this area, namely, in Northern Siam, although
there are at present no direct indications of such occurrence.

The western limit of the range passes over the mountains of the eastern part of
Russian Turkestan, the Pamirs, and the western edge of India, reaching in places westward
(exceptionally ?) to the middle course of the Amu Darya near the city of Karki. It is more
than likely that this goose occurs on the Pamirs in far greater numbers than is commonly
supposed.

136 Geese of Europe and Asia

Although it is at present impossible to determine where the northern boundary of
its range runs, yet we know that this goose breeds in great numbers on the Thian-shan alpine
lakes (saz), and probably still farther north than the Thian-shan proper, namely, over the
whole of the Ala-tau. I make this suggestion on the ground that I myself had the oppor-
tunity of observing in August on the Little Yuldus, in the Thian-shan, a multitude of
migratory flocks of bar-headed geese flying extremely high over the mountain masses of
the latter, from north to south ;' and whence could these flocks Бе flying, if not from the
Ala-tau range? We cannot yet ascertain where lies the northern limit of the breeding
erounds of this species farther eastward.

Here it may be mentioned that Dr. Sushkin, in his journey to the Minusinsk district
in the summer of 1902, made the following notes, which I extract in full from a letter of the
eminent ornithologist : “dzser zndicus does not occur at all in the locality I have visited,
but it appears in vast numbers on crossing the Tannu-Ola range into Mongolia proper from
the land of Uryankha.

“This is unanimously asserted by both Soyots and Russian traders. They call this
species the Mongolian goose, and describe it as smaller than the domesticated bird, with a
very light grey colour like the wing of a bustard or sea-gull, a yellow bill, and black streaks
on the head, like a hood.”

On the whole, it is quite possible that farther eastwards the northern limit of the breeding
grounds ascends somewhat, since flocks of these geese were met with by Dybowski and
Godlewski on Koso-gol, and by the latter in July 1876, a gander (from a pair) was killed on Lake
Baikal. The chief centres of the breeding range of this species are, however, undoubtedly the
lakes of the Tibetan plateau, and in the south Kashmir, Ladak, and in all probability Sikhim.

So far as is yet known, this goose breeds nowhere beyond the mountain zone. It
winters throughout India, mainly in the northern provinces, in countless numbers; in the
south of India, on the other hand, it is met with in far smaller numbers, and in Ceylon it
is unknown. Although it may occur in winter in South Afghanistan and Baluchistan, I
have found no record to that effect. It is very probable that it dwells here and there perma-
nently in the Himalaya, but it has nowhere been found nesting below an elevation of
6000 feet; and for this reason it may bear the name of ‘mountain goose” bestowed by
Przewalsk1.

Migrating to its breeding grounds in spring it occurs, for example, but rarely on Lob-
Nor, according to that explorer, but in autumn, if we believe native report, it visits that lake
in great numbers. Hence it is clear that it has migration routes which are by no means
constant in spring and autumn—a feature common to several other species of geese, as [
have noted, for example, in the case of the greater and lesser white-fronted species.

The details of the distribution of this goose, within the above limits, cannot yet be
worked out; and only in regard to its winter haunts do we possess fuller data than for
several other species of geese, as is noted below in the extracts from the works of Messrs.
Hume and Oates.

Przewalski gives us the following details on the habits and behaviour of the “ mountain
goose”: “This species,” he writes, ‘nests exclusively on mountain swamps and along
streams or meres on high plateaux, as on Koko-Nor, where it arrives in early spring—about
the end of February or beginning of March. From the time of their arrival these geese
associate in flocks of from five to twenty individuals, and soon proceed to build their nests

1 Against a strong south-east wind.

oe,

Bar-headed Goose 127

in the marshes, probably for lack of cliffs in the neighbourhood, where these geese usually
nest when in the mountains.

“In the pairing season the male frequently pursues the female on the wing, turning
somersaults in the air like a raven.

_ “The mountain-goose is fairly tame, and remarkably inquisitive, especially if not in
flocks; and when a pair are pursued they will fly not unfrequently towards the fowler,
squatting in the grass or lying flat on the ground.”

In another passage the same writer observes, as if in continuation of the last phrase:
“Tf one of the pair be killed, the survivor oer the male) flies with a cry round its dead
mate, and usually itself gets shot.

“Having noticed a pair flying in the distance, I lay on the ground and began to
gently wave my cap; on seeing this, the geese flying past swept round in my direction,
and often flew right over my head.

“The cry of this species is a somewhat whimpering but rather loud note. The
goslings, of which there are from five to eight in a brood, keep with their parents about the
streams or lakes by which they were hatched. The old birds at this time begin to moult,
and by the beginning of July, when the young birds have almost grown up, are so devoid of
feathers that they are quite unable to Ну’ The mountain-geese, at other seasons rather
trustful, then become very wary.

“On the large lakes, such as Koko-Nor, where there are very many of these geese,
scores of broods combine for mutual defence.

“Usually a flock will wander along the shores of a lake or on the neighbouring
marshes, cropping the grass; but on perceiving a fowler, even half a mile off, all the geese rush
headlong into the lake and swim far away. They run very fast, probably faster than a man.”

Severtsov, who described it under the name of 4user skorniakovi, gives us very little
information with regard to this species, although we learn from him that it was first
discovered on Chatyr-kul and Son-kul.

Godlewski found it on the southern part of Lake Baikal, and he and Dybowski noticed
it in flocks on Kosogol, where it breeds in small numbers.

Mr. Hume observed this goose in great flocks in India; and Mr. Oates also furnishes
us with some valuable notes respecting this species, the Sena of which is quoted
below. The geographical distribution of this species in India is indeed well described
by the latter author, who gives a concise and clear picture of the general disposition of
its winter haunts. |

‘The bar-headed goose,” he writes, ‘‘ visits the plains of India in the cold weather,
arriving in October and leaving in March, or even April, but these dates vary, of course,
according to locality and climate. This species may be considered a common bird in
Northern India from the Punjab to Assam. On the western side it appears to occur as far
south as Sind, and rarely in the Bombay Presidency; it is common in the Central Provinces ;
and on the east coast it extends down to the Chilka Lake. In Southern India this goose is by
no means so rare as it is generally deemed. It has been found in large numbers in Mysore.

. Jerdon, on one occasion, observed this species in the extreme south of India. It is not
known in Ceylon. South of Assam, this goose has been observed... in Sylhet and...
in Manipur. It occurs... on the Chindwin River, and . . . is common enough in the
Irrawaddy River and adjacent tanks and backwaters, down to Myingyan at the least.”

+ A common feature of all geese, swans, and ducks, as the flight-feathers always fall out simultaneously.

138 Geese of Europe and Asia

After afew more details, Mr. Oates concludes that the ts of the Indian visitors
probably come to us from Central Asia.”

_ This 15 what Мг. Hume has to say: “Their habits are similar to those of the grey-
lags. Where frequently disturbed, they feed inland only at night; where rarely molested,
they will be found feeding up to eight or nine in the morning, and again long before sunset.
The day, or at all events the warmer hours of this, they pass by the water’s side. They feed
in fields, preferentially in those in the immediate neighbourhood of the larger rivers, browsing
on the young wheat or waddling awkwardly amongst the heavy clods, amidst which the gram
grows, to devour the young shoots, or later the ripening pods of this vetch. All vetches,
lentils, grain, tender grasses, and herbs seem equally to suit their taste, and so long as these
are available they eat nothing else, and by the end of December (thin and poor as they
usually are when they first arrive) they are generally in fine condition. . . . :

“The note of the bar-headed goose is quite distinct from that of the grey-lag. It is
sharper, harder, less sonorous, and more strident. I hardly know how to put it in words,
but it is so distinct that you can never doubt, even when the flock is passing overhead high
in air, during the night, to which species it belongs. The two species never mingle
companies ; you may see half a dozen of the one along with a flock of the other, but welts:
feeding, sleeping, swimming, or flying, the parties keep a little apart.”

Like the grey-lag, the Indian goose rarely settles on water, unless alarmed.
According to Mr. Damant, in Manipur this goose has the following habit: “I have often
watched them,” he writes, ‘‘ returning from their feeding-grounds to the lake where they intend
to pass the day; their cry is heard before they can themselves be seen; they then appear
flying in the form of a wedge, each bird keeping its place with perfect regularity ; when they
reach the lake they circle round once or twice, and, finally, before settling, each bird tumbles
over in the air two or three times precisely like a tumbler pigeon. After they have once
settled they preserve no regular formation.” | |

Мг. Hume also cites the interesting observations of Colonel Tickell: “They are first
noticed in Bengal about the middle of October, flying, like the crane, in single diagonal (or
echelon) lines, or in two lines, forming an acute angle. At such times their mingled voices
sound like ill-blown clarionets, each emitting a single note. As they wend along in the air
the leading bird is seen every four or five minutes to drop to the rear, its place being
immediately filled by the next one, which is in turn relieved by the next, and soon. This
movement is to be seen amongst cranes, pelicans, spoonbills, swans, and other birds which
perform long migratory voyages; from which it would seem that the leading bird meets with
greater resistance from the air than do the succeeding files, and thus requires to be relieved
after a certain time from its post.

“When about to settle, the line breaks up, and the birds, mingling together, sweep
round in circles, approaching nearer and nearer to the earth, till, with a great flapping of
wings, they settle.”

Very little is known of the nidification of this species. It is asserted that on the
lakes of Ladak and Tibet these geese breed indifferently in fresh and salt waters; but
I find this difficult to believe, as I know that even purely marine ducks and geese (for
example, eiders and brent) invariably breed near fresh water, and could hardly do
without it in rearing their young. It is stated that they select by preference small eyots
on lakes; according to others, as we saw from Przewalski, they nest on cliffs. Probably
both modes occur, according to circumstances and the convenience afforded by different spots.

Bar-headed Goose 139

The nest is described as a shallow depression in the ground, lined first with
the stalks of soft plants and above with down and feathers, so that in this respect it
accords with the descriptions of nests of other members of the group.

The eggs, 4 to 6 in a clutch, are nearly elliptical in shape; and the shell is somewhat
rough, white, and without any gloss.

Mr. Gobel has drawn up for me the following table of measurements of the eggs of
Turkestan specimens of this species :—

Max. breadth 58.5 mm. ( = 2:30 in.), with 78 mm. length (= 3.07 in.), and 1422 cgrm. weight.

Min. ” 56.5 ” (= 2.22 4, } ” | 81.5 › ›, (= 3.20 5 )s » 1422 ” ”

Wax р, “DRCAGt == 202 Oy ky OO te A;

о с -

Мах. weight 1422 cerm., with 56.5 mm. breadth (= 2.22 in.), and 81.5 mm. eae ie a >. in.)

Max. ” 1422 9 ” 55. БЕ ” (= 2.30 › ; ” 78 ” ” (= о ).

Min. ” 1392 ” ” 58 ” ” (= 22855, ; ” 82.5 ” ” (= 3.24 › a.

Or
Mean breadth 57.5 mm. (= 2.26 in.) ; max. breadth 58.5 mm. (= 2.30 in.); and min. breadth 56.5 mm. (= 2.22 in.)

р ЕО: (60.0.9 C3017 о al ee legothian7S О os
7 RWeIONG ео со » weight 1680 cerm. ; юр WeISDE “11.33 се

According to other information, the eggs attain a length of 83.8 mm. (=3.30 in.), and,
probably, we are still far from knowing their extreme variations in these respects,

Genus Rufibrenta, Bonaparte (1856)

DISTINGUISHED from other genera of geese with black feet by the circumstance that the
whole chin is feathered, or, at least, the feathering of the chin falls short of the posterior
margin of the nail of the lower mandible by only 14-2 mm. (=0.05-0.07 in.). The bill is
distinguished by a very strongly convex, rounded nail on the upper mandible, and by the
fact that the nasal depressions are either in complete contact with the feathering of the lores,
or approach the latter very closely.

The teeth on each side of the upper mandible do not exceed 16! in number, and with
shut bill are not visible externally, since they do not project with their tips beyond the
tomia. The plumage is mottled, comprising the colours black, white, and rufous, and
across the wing run two transverse white bars. The tail-coverts do not reach the tips
of the tail-feathers, of which there are 16.

THE RED-BREASTED GOOSE
RUFIBRENTA RUFICOLLIS, PALLAS
Plate 15

English—Red-breasted Goose.

Russian—Kyvasnozobaya kazarka (more a book-name); vasnozobaya kazard (Bogdanov);
ryzhesheek, ryzhesheyaya kazarka, and tsvetuaya kazarka (all three names on the
Sarpa, асс. Artsybashev); chubaraya kazarka (Ural); kvrasnozoby nemodk and
mimok;, piskunets (Turukhansk, acc. Middendorff) ; chukunok (perhaps chugunok ?,
at Tolsty Nos’); ménshaya kazarka (Lepekhin); morskaya kazarka (Obi);
> turpan (Obi, feste Finsch; hardly correct); skmakovaya utka (Vavilov*).

Ostyak—Chakvot, chagvot, and chogvot (Obi); also ? Lak (teste Finsch). |

Kalmyk—Sunksur.

Samoyed—Chagu; Seontya (Boganida, Middendorff).

Kirgiz—Kekchentat; Kara-kaz (Zarudny).

Yakut—Kazarka (Boganida).

German—Meppelgans ; Rothalsgans ; Rothalsmeergans; Spiegelzans; Mopsgans.

French—Sernache a cou roux.

1 In the brent goose (Lranta bernicla) the number of teeth on each side of the upper mandible varies from 28 to 30, so far as 1
can judge from the material examined.
2 Schmidt, Ме. Ac. /. Sc. St.-Pét., 7th ser., vol. xviii. No. 1, р. 43 (1872).
3 Okhota v Rossi, pt. iv. р. 44. Mote-——Confused with М№йа rujina?
140

Вед-Бгеаме4 Goose 141

Anser ruficollis, Pallas, Spicil. Zool. iv. Part ©, в; ЭГ (1769): 20. “Voyages: ive pp. 23, 51, аа: 672
(vujicollis et pulchricollis); id., Zoogr. Ross.-As., ii. pi 230 (уе: (тва) Мей, Cats ais, р 96
(1832); Eversmann, Or. Кг, iii. р. 557; Kessler, Russk. Orn., р. 369; Naumann, Убе. Deutschl.
xi. р. 408, pl. 293 (1842); Middendorff, Reis. Sib, И. 2, р. 2209, pl. xx. fig. 3 (ovum); Severtsov,
Gorizont. i Vertik. Raspr. Turk. Zh., р. 70 (1873); Menzbier, Pt. Ross., i. р. 730 (1895); 24., Okhotn.
i Prom. Pt. Ross. i КауК. ii. р. 463, pl. 132 (juv. 2) (1902); Kholodk. i Sil, Pt. Yevr, р. 524
(1900); Zhitnikov, M., Orn. nabl. na Atreke (“Psov. i Ruzh. ОКБ.” 1900) (winter 1898 and spring
1899); Buturlin, Dikie Gusi Ross. Imp. (“Psov. i Ruzh. Okhota,” 1901); 24. separ. p. 6 (1901, Tula);
Artsybashev, Bull. Soc. Mosc, 18509, Ш. р. 100; Yakovlev, Bull. Soc. Mosc, 1872, р. 356;
Saban., Ukaz. Kn. St. Okh. Zool. Sod. рр. 455-458 (1883); Sushkin, Pt. Uf. gub, р. 68 (1897);
Deryugin, Trudy Imp. Spb. Obshch. Yest., xxix. pt. 2 (1898); Yablonsky, Okhota у Minus. uyezde,
Yenis. gub. (“ Prir. i Okhota,” 1891, vii. р. 58).

Anas torquata, Gmelin, Reis. Russl., ii. р. 179, pl. 14 (1774).

Anas pulchricollis, Georgi, Reis. Russ. R., р. 167 (1775).

Anas ruficollts, Latham, Gen. Syn., Suppl. i. р. 297 (1790).

Anser torquatus, Bonnaterre (mec Frisch), Encyclop. Méthod., i. р. 122 (1790).

Bernicla ruficollis, Boie, Isis, 1822, р. 563; Brehm, Isis, 1830, р. 996; Gould, Birds of Europe, v. pl. 351
(1837); Malmgr., J. f. Orn, 1870, р. 305; Dresser, Birds of Europe, vi. р. 403, pl. 416 (1876) ;
Finsch, Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien., 1879, p. 260; Sclater, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lon., 1880, p. 502; Henke,
Zeitschr. Ges. Orn., 1885, p. 48, pl. iv.; Lilford, Col. Figures Brit. Birds, pl. xxi (1892); Alphéraky,
“Zhurn. Okhoty,” 1877, ii. рр. 79 and 80; Fritsch, Nat. Убе. Eur. (1870), р. 403, pl. 49, fig. 10;
Degl. and Gerbe, Orn, Eur., И. р. 490; Cordeaux, Brit. Birds, Nests and Eggs, pt. 15; Zarudny,
Ornit. Е. Or. Kr, р. 225 (1888); 24, Порош. К Orn. Е. Or. Kr, р. 107 (1897); Radde, Ornis
Cauc., р. 441 (1884); Bogdanov, Pt. Zver. Povolzh. р. 148 (1871); Radde and Walter, 3rd Suppl.
Orn. Cauc., 1888, р. 41.

Leucopareta ruficollts, Reichenbach, Av. Syst. М., р. ix. (1852).

Bernicla (Rufibrenta) ruficollis, Bonaparte, Compt.-Rend., xliii. p. 648 (1856).

kKufibrenta ruficollts, Grey, Hand-List of Birds, iii. р. 76 (1871).

Anas (Bernicla) ruficollis, Lemetteil., Bull. Soc. Zool. France, У. р. 75 (1880) (Seine Inférieure).

Anser (Brenthus) ruficollis, Reichenbach, Orn. Centralbl., 1882, р. 37.

Branta ruficollis, Salvadori, Elenc. Осс. Ital. р. 254 (1886); zd, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus., xxvii. р. 126 (1895);
Oates, Man. Game В. Ind., pt. 2, р. 72.

Ptocas ruficollts, Pearson, “ Beyond Petsora,” р. 8 (1899) (Lake Ukanskoe, in Russian Lapland),

Menshaya kazarka, Lepekhin, Putesh,, И. р. 298 (1802).

Brenta ruficollis, Ruzsky, Sistem. spis. Pt. Kaz. gub. (“Trudy Obshch. Yest. pri. Kaz. Univ.,” xxv. pt. 6,
p. 114 (1893)).

ADULT MALE

Forehead, occiput, nape, and hind part of neck shiny black; from occiput descends a
similar black streak past eyes, joining the black of the chin and throat. Between sides of
bill and eye a large round white patch, sharply cut off by above-mentioned black areas;
on aural region a large rufous (cinnamon) somewhat square patch, bordered by a white
streak, which descends from posterior lower angle of rufous patch along sides of neck,
separating black of back of neck from rufous (cinnamon) of anterior part of neck and whole
of breast. Here the bright rufous colouring is limited by a narrow white transverse bar,
beginning on upper part of back. A black edging, more or less clearly defined, lies
between this white band and rufous colouring of breast, attaining its greatest breadth at
sides of latter near to back.

Back, rump, tail, and upper part of belly black; lower part of belly, sides of vent, and
upper and under tail-coverts pure white. Flanks white with black transverse crescentic bars,
due to black tips of feathers. Tail (16 feathers) flat, and rounded terminally. Wings brown-
black, lesser coverts with lighter edges; median and greater wing-coverts with almost
perfectly white edgings, forming two white slightly oblique bars across wing. Lower
wing-coverts shiny black; axillaries black. All the flight-feathers brown-black. Shafts of
primaries white only in basal third.

142 | Geese of Europe and Asia

Bill, legs, feet, and unfeathered part of eyelids black. Iris dark chestnut or hazel.
According to the statements of some authors, there are sometimes, but apparently by
no means always, a few white feathers on the forehead of adult males at the base of the bill,
but I have not seen these in any skin I have examined. As to the feathering of the chin, in
the majority of cases this is not wholly black, but has a sprinkling of white plumules, giving
the chin a mottled appearance.
| ADULT FEMALE

In outward appearance resembles adult male, but generally inferior in size. Among
other features, the bill, so far as I could ascertain (from inadequate material), does not
exceed 26 mm. (= 1.02 in.) in culmen-length. There is also, seemingly, no difference in the
brightness of the colouring. It may be surmised that sometimes immature males have been
mistaken for females.

DIMENSIONS OF ADULT BIRDS OF BOTH SEXES

Total length ; 540—560 mm. (= 21.2—22 in.).
Wing. т 350—360 mm. (= 13.7—14.т in.).
Sie ae ; 153-154 mm. (= 5.90—6 in.).
Culmen ; ' 25—27 mm. (= I-—I1.10 in.).

Bill from gape. | 27—28 mm. (= 1.06—I.10 in.).
Depth of bill at base ое both о 19 mm. (=0.74 in.).

Tarsus 51—52 mm. (= 2—2.04 in.).

Number of Ege on ae arte of Boner ЕВ 16.

YounG Birps (IN SECOND YEAR)?

Shiny black of plumage replaced by brown; instead of a rufous patch in aural region,
a similar grey-brown one, with more or less admixture of rufous plumules, the whole patch
being of indefinite outline, mingling with the surrounding whitish (not white) streak. As
regards the rufous colouring of the anterior part of neck and upper breast, it can only be
said that it is lighter (rufous buff) than in adult birds. White transverse bar, bordering
inferiorly the rufous of upper breast, less definite, and no black margin between this and the
rufous, or only in the shape of a few separate black-brown plumules.

Tail-feathers with very narrow white or whitish tips. Under side of wings and
axillaries grey-brown.

Feathering on chin with a large admixture of white featherlets, giving it a he
mottled appearance.

Tips of greater wing-coverts light buff; consequently both transverse bars across the
wing are of this colour and not white.

Comparing the present description with the figure of a goose of this species in
Professor Menzbier’s Okhotuichyt # Promyslovyya Ptitsy Vevropeiskoi Rossii + Kavkaza by
Mr. Thorburn, it is clear that the latter is taken from a young (adult) bird.

Of the young in down I have no information.

GEOGRAPHICAL DIsTRIBUTION

The range of the red-breasted goose has been worked out in great detail by Professor

Menzbier in his Pfetsy Rosstz, and our knowledge has hardly been increased since the
appearance of that excellent work.

1 I do not know how many years this species takes to attain full dress; it is difficult to determine this from the plumage of two
and three-year-old birds, but nevertheless I think, for various reasons, that the description here given applies to two-year-olds,

Red-breasted Goose 142

According to that author, the species nests throughout the tundra of Western Siberia,
from the lower Obi to the lower course of the Yenisei, at a comparatively small distance
from the shore.

Professor Middendorff has furnished notes on the distribution of this goose on the
Boganida and Pyasina, and Mr. Seebohm in the Yenisei district. Professor Menzbier holds
it to be clearly established that this goose does not breed to the westward of the Ural range,
or to the eastward of the north-eastern cape of the Taimyr peninsula; but if the data
collected by Mr. Pearson in the summer of 1895 (see /d7s, 1896, р. 210) as to its breeding
in Lapland on Lake Ukanskoe be confirmed, the limit of the range of this species will be
extended considerably to the west of the line accepted by the author of Pritsy Юо55й.1

With this more westerly boundary of its habitat the frequent appearance of the red-
breasted goose in Western Europe would be far more intelligible, but, unfortunately, nothing
more can be said on the subject until there is actual confirmation of the data collected by
Mr. Pearson. Professor Menzbier has explained very clearly the migration routes of these
geese, both in spring and in autumn, how they descend by the rivers Obi, Irtysh, and Ural
to winter in the southern part of the Caspian, where those flocks assemble which, not taking
this line, travel through the Kirgiz steppes, halting from time to time on rivers and lakes,
as also do those which travel direct from the Tobol through the Kirgiz steppes to the lower
reaches of the Syr-Darya.

Of the vast numbers of red-breasted geese wintering in the Mugan steppe, Dr.
Walter writes as follows: “шп 1886, at the end of December, I met this beautiful kazarka
in the Mugan, in the more northerly, less populous part between Karagalinsk and Salian, in
colossal flocks at the lake-like broads of the lower Kura, together with flocks of ‘ogars’
(Casarca casarca), between December 21 and January 2, 1887. The geese at dusk visited
the few winter crops of this scantily inhabited steppe. On the approach of night they flew
in thousands from the fields over my cart. On January 17 I saw several small gaggles
flying low from place to place, and seeking in broad daylight spots free from snow.”

That the red-breasted species winters also somewhat to the east of the Caspian, in
parts of Persia, appears from a most interesting article full of information by Mr. Zhitnikoy,
“ Ornitologicheskiya nablyudeniya na г. Atreke,” in the Psovaya 7 Ruzheinaya Okhota for
1900, to which we shall refer again more than once.

“Оп the return migration, that is in spring, a host of red-breasted geese, having
ascended northwards to the mouth of the Volga”—writes Professor Menzbier—“ partly con-
tinues its course by the regular route (z.e. to the mouth of the Ural) towards Kalmykov,
Orsk, Tobol, and so on, but in part turns aside to the Volga and ascends by its valley to
Sarepta, halting for a short time on the Sarpa, whence it travels along the river Ural to
Uralsk.”

As to this bird’s straying to Archangel and Finland, if only the statement of its
breeding in Lapland prove to be true, we shall obtain another explanation than the one offered
by Professor Menzbier'’s hypothesis, namely, that such cases are due to birds which have
lost their way. The visits of this species to the regions of the Kama, the middle Volga, Oka,
Poland, and the Novorossiisk district, are probably far more frequent than is supposed, and
I think it very possible that its appearance in South Russia is even quite normal. Thus, for
example, beyond any doubt (at any rate in my mind) these geese pass in autumn near

1 According to a Samoyed, who has long resided on Matochkin Shar, a “mottled goose” is occasionally met with there, which
Mr. Buturlin surmises in his communication to me on the subject may be the red-breasted goose,

144 _ Geese of Europe and Asia

Taganrog, together with countless flocks of the lesser white-fronted species. Their numbers
may perhaps be comparatively small, but I should not be surprised if time should prove that
they winter in the southern part of the Black Sea, a region zoologically almost entirely
unexplored. Professor Menzbier defines the eastern limit of the migrations of this species
as the neighbourhood of Irkutsk.

Although there are no positive data in regard to India, we yet have Blyth’s statements,
which permit the belief that this goose has occurred in that country, to which it may turn
out that it isa regular winter visitor. It is known, for instance, that of late years there have
been observed in India, and in some cases in considerable numbers, species formerly no one
expected to find there, such as Avesmatura leucocephala, Nyroca baert, Anser finmarchicus,
and duas zonorhyncha, so that there 15 nothing improbable in the occurrence of the
present bird.

The rarity of the red-breasted goose on migration in Turkestan has yet to be verified.
This species has also been recorded from North-west Africa, Italy (Florence, Mantua),
France (Seine Inférieure), Holland (where, among other cases, a red-breasted goose was
once killed from a flock of barnacle geese, together with twenty-three of the latter), Galicia,
Hungary, various parts of Germany, etc. Mr. H. Saunders records sixteen instances of this
goose being killed in Great Britain,’ the last specimen being shot in Essex from a flock
of brent in January 1871, and its skin subsequently sold by auction for thirty guineas.

That the extent of the winter haunts of this goose was formerly greater than at
present is evident from the fact that coloured representations of the species have been
preserved to this day in the tombs and temples of Ancient Egypt, while it is now never
met with on the Nile. It is not yet clear whether it occurs in winter in Spain, although
it can hardly be doubted that it sometimes finds its way to that country.

Although red-breasted geese arrive late at their breeding-grounds, not before the end
of May or even the beginning of June, and at once proceed to. build their nests, the
movement northwards from their winter haunts begins very early. Thus, according to
Mr. Zhitnikov’s observations, the red-breasted geese wintering on the Gyurgen disappeared
between January 18 and 23, and on January 22 reappeared on a lake in the middle course
of the Atrek, whence about February 7 they were already winging their way farther
north. |

From the South-western Caspian they start in the same direction towards the end of
February, and by the beginning of March appear near Astrakhan; they then gradually move
northwards, halting in the Kirgiz steppes till April, and later on leisurely continue their
journey north, reaching their native tundra either by the end of May or in the beginning of
June. Near Orenburg Mr. Zarudny came across them in small skeins of from 3 to 15 birds
during the whole of April.

Professor Middendorff writes as follows of this species: “Т have not found it on the
Taimyr, but they say it usually nests and moults at the mouth of the Pyasina.

“This goose frequently breeds on the Boganida, where, on June 25, the eggs were
slightly incubated. As these are unknown and very peculiar, I give a figure. They are
from 69 to 71 mm. (2.71-2.79 in.) long, with a diameter of 44-45 mm. (= 1.73-1.77 in.)

These scanty data were almost all that was known until Mr. Seebohm visited the
Yenisei, and this traveller was the first among English ornithologists to get a nest (with two

1 Yarrell’s British Birds, vol. iv. рр. 282-283.

Red-breasted Goose 145

eggs) in the valley of the Yenisei in the year 1877. He observed these geese with their
-young broods on the banks of this river at the end of June. In 1895 Mr. H. L. Popham
had the good luck to find four nests in the Yenisei district, containing respectively
7, 7, 8, and 9 creamy-white eggs. The females in each case were shot from the nest. The
nests were placed at the foot of a cliff occupied by a peregrine or rough-legged buzzard, and
well lined with down.! They are described as resembling those of the bean-goose,’ but
smaller. The creamy-white eggs, of which the shell is very fragile, have an underlying
green tint showing through.

As Mr. Gobel measured and weighed only one egg of the red-breasted goose, I give
a table based on the scanty data available. |

Breadth or diameter from 45—55 mm. (= 1.73—1.77 in.).

Length or diameter from 69—72 mm. (= 2.71—2.83 in.).

Weight (one example) 600 cgrm.

Gobel’s egg: breadth 45 mm. (= 1.73 in.), and length 72 mm. ( = 2.83 in.).

The young in down are still unknown. In this, as in other geese, the moulting of
the old birds begins immediately after hatching. Thus, Dr. Radde states that the geese of
this species kept in captivity at Tiflis began to moult at the end of June, from which it may
be inferred that, when wild in the north, they do so rather later, probably not before the
middle, or even the end, of July. Although we are not in a position to determine the date of
the autumn migration southwards, yet we may safely assume this to be simultaneous with
that of the lesser white-fronted species.

Deferring mention of its habits till later, we give here Mr. Zhitnikovss interesting
notes on this species made on the Atrek.

This naturalist saw no kazarkas (as the natives call this goose) on the lake’ until
January 22, but on that day, ‘‘ having arrived at the lake in the morning, I was struck,” he
writes, “Бу the extraordinary number of kazarkas gathered there before daybreak, the whole
eastern shore being thickly covered with a black mass of them, which at dawn flew off to feed
in the steppe beyond the Atrek. Previously on that day I had noticed some difference in the
cry and flight of the birds, but I explained the assembling of these flocks on the hitherto
deserted lake by the natural sociability of birds preparing to migrate. On the following
days we shot in the Gudri Olum, where I saw the first traces of the spring passage then
just beginning, and, together with a noticeably increased number of ducks, observed also
some new birds. С. М. V——, for instance, killed a glossy ibis from a flock evidently
migrating. Having returned home, I learned that a rare goose had been killed on the lake,
which, to my astonishment, I found to be a red-breasted goose (4user ruficollis). I now
realised the reason of the host of geese on the lake on January 22, and their strange cries:
evidently they were passing flocks of the red-breasted species. But whence had this splendid
bird come, since there were no traces of its wintering оп the Atrek?” Here the author
relates how he had previously heard at Christmas from an officer from the neighbouring
Russian post in Persia (Gumbet-Kobuz, 45 versts distant from Chatly) that a number of
birds had appeared there, larger than ducks and smaller than geese, of a “chocolate ” colour,
resembling in flight and call the white-fronted goose, which also winters there. The author
continues: “Г am now convinced that the ‘chocolate-bird’ wintering in Persia was un-
doubtedly the red-breasted goose, flocks of which, evidently moving north, I saw on this

1 Jbis, 1897, pp. 96-100. 2 Genus Melanonyx, species unknown. 3 Middle stream of Atrek.
U

146 Geese of Europe and Asia

lake. During these days, after January 22, there was an unusual number, even to the eyes
of the natives, of these birds everywhere—in the steppe, on the washes of the Gudri-Olum,
and on the lake. They were clearly birds of passage joining those wintering on the lake
that caused the increase in the number of geese. |

‘The days were very warm, and the nights moderately cold. From a Cossack officer
we learned that these geese pass the night on the lake, and in the daytime fly off to the
steppe, coming back only to drink. They keep only to the flat shore, allowing no one to
approach within even several hundred paces.”

The same author gives a very lively and interesting description of his first shooting
geese from pits dug on the shore, whence it appears that this species grazes in the Steppe: in
company with lesser white-fronted geese.

The author says he purposely abstained from shooting for two days on the lake, in
order to allow the geese to become familiar with the appearance of his ambush; but on
the third day he and his companion were already seated in their pits at break of day.
“Thick clouds of geese (of both species) got up from the shores of the lake, cackling
incessantly, and flew off to the steppe; and the abandoned lake now contained only
sheldrakes and avocets. A belated gaggle of geese had alighted near my place of
concealment, but a white-tailed eagle at once dispersed them, giving me no eHee of
shooting.

“We sat in our pits to no purpose until eight o’clock, and then went to the river, to
drink tea, on our way putting up brahmini ducks feeding in the steppe grass. Having
finished our tea,—a nasty, muddy infusion from the river, but not brackish,—we again took
up our posts in the pits, after carefully screening them with grass.

‘At ten in the morning the call of the geese resounded from the Atrek; a series of
black streaks showed from. beyond the river; nearer and nearer they flew, and the whole
steppe round was filled with clouds of birds. To gain any idea of the vast masses that
collect to migrate, one must actually see this host of geese, and hear their cackle, which
drowns the human voice. Without any exaggeration, it may be said there were tens of
thousands of birds; some of the flocks containing from at least 300 to 500 birds. Flock
after flock arrived on the lake; the first parties were followed by others, and from beyond
the river appeared the ever-approaching squadrons. They flew for the most part in masses,
and only small flocks of 10 to 20 geese disposed themselves in transverse lines. |

“Tt may here be added that in winter the kazarkas generally flew to the water and
back in crowds, or more rarely in a transverse drawn-out line, but very seldom in single file
or ina ‘key,’ that is, in a longitudinal line or wedge, like swans, most geese, and cranes.

“The flocks on arrival circled above the lake, and seeing nothing suspicious, settled,
although far from the shore; they flew very high and dropped vertically on to the water.
The majority of the flocks consisted of Auser erythropus,’ but there were also many
A. ruficollis, slightly distinguished by the deep black of the belly, the bright white streak
on the wings, and their squeaky, shriller-toned note compared with the white-fronted species,
as well as by their notably inferior size. The last flocks, seeing their fellows already sitting
on the water, descended much lower as they approached the lake.” Then follows the
account of the day’s shooting, which, notwithstanding its interest, we omit, taking up
Zhitnikov’s story at the place where it has a more direct application to the present subject.

“Two days later we again went to the lake, but sat in vain the whole day in our

1 That is, the lesser white-fronted (A. finmarchicus) of the present volume.

Red-breasted Goose 147

pits; there were only two or three flocks of geese in all, which showed on the lake at noon,
to leave at once for the steppe, whence they returned no more. Evidently the main body
had flown past to the north, and in fact a few days later we heard that a large number
had appeared in the steppes at Yagly-Olum (45 versts north of Chatly, on the Atrek).
Clearly the birds, having wintered far from the sea, in the valleys of Persia, travelled north,
not by the shore, the Urals, and the Kirgiz steppes, as they are wont to fly from the
Caspian to the tundras of Northern Asia, but were moving by the valley of the Atrek and
subsequently the Transcaspian desert, once the Atrek and its tributaries were left behind.”

Farther on we read: “Оп February 12 we rode out to Gudri with G. М. The
kazarkas were still fewer; grey-lags in the same numbers as before; flocks of 77inga
appeared, and we saw many lapwings on passage. From time to time were seen flocks of
Pterocles а’епата and Alchata severtsovi returning to the north. It should be mentioned
that in the Persian valleys, about the river Gyurgen, there winter millions of lesser
bustard and turkushkas (Yanellus gregarius), and also common bustards. We now
received the news that about a month previously kazarkas, both kinds of bustard, and
in part the turkushkas had disappeared from the neighbourhood of Gumbet-Kobuz.
Reckoning three to four weeks backwards from the day we received this information, we
obtain approximately the date of the kazarkas leaving the Gyurgen; that is to say, they
must have disappeared between January 18 and 23; and, indeed, on January 22 they
were with us on the lake. Is it not, then, manifest that the kazarkas, which remain here
till February 5, arrived from Persia, from the Gyurgen, moving northwards by the valley
of the Atrek and not by the seashore? I dwell specially on this point, because the
migration routes of the red-breasted goose have been strictly determined, and include
the shore of the Caspian and the rivers Volga, Ural, Tobol, Irtysh, and Obi, while there
was hitherto no evidence of the passage of the geese along the Atrek.”

Leaving these interesting observations of Mr. Zhitnikov, we turn to Dr. Radde in
his Ovuzs Caucasica, who writes as follows :—

“T know of this most beautiful of all the kazarkas from the whole south-western
shore of the Caspian, but only as a winter visitor. In the middle of March there were
no more red-breasted geese at Lenkoran; they had already left for the north-east.! Near
Baku it is known to every one, and I saw it there at the house of the Vice-governor
Glinozarev, a great bird-fancier, in the company of spoonbills, flamingoes, brahmini ducks,
and sheldrakes, in 1867.

“Two specimens were once brought to the so-called acclimatisation garden at
Tiflis, where, without any care, they lived with the domesticated fowls, and were perfectly
tame. They graze like ordinary geese, that is, crop the young short grass, and, in
captivity, at first take no other food. Later on they get used to barley and wheat, but
green food, by preference young shoots of grass, is still necessary to them.

In November 1879 these kazarkas were not yet to be found near Lenkoran.
They appeared only when the cold weather had set in, and kept to the north on the
fresh-water lowlands, in the steppe-zone, and especially on the spots thickly covered with
herbage. They flew out for the night far to sea, returning towards morning in large
crowds for the pastures.” They are said to collect in considerable numbers on the
Burani Islands, not far from the Kizil-agach shore, to the north of Sari Island. There, on

1 | give a free and somewhat abbreviated translation of Dr. Radde’s account.
2 Notwithstanding my late friend Dr. Radde’s statement that the kazarkas flew out “to sea” for the night, I am firmly convinced
they pass the night not on the water but on uncovered sandbanks or on islands.

148 Geese of Europe and ‘Asia

one of the islands, called Yershan, are situated the favourite haunts of these beautiful
geese; and there they assemble in dense throngs before migration. At first 20 to
30 together, then 80, 100, 200, and finally all the flocks, unite into one general mass,
and leave all together in the beginning of March. ‘Their departure depends, however,
on the weather, and when, on March 17, 1880, I visited this locality, I did not find a
single red-breasted goose. In one year, at the end of February, at the same spot,
on the meadows near the fish-factory, after a heavy fall of snow, more than 200
of these splendid birds were caught in a net at once. or this purpose an area of
10 to 15 square fathoms was cleared of snow, where the hungry geese alighted, as all
the country round was covered with snow. A coarse-meshed net was then cast over them
by the concealed fowlers, and the whole flock taken.

“ Unfortunately I arrived too late, and all these birds were sold for a mere song—
5 to 10 kopeks each—for down and feathers.” |

Later on Dr. Radde writes: “Т had no better luck in the Molokan settlement
Astrakhanka, where in the memory of man there had not been so many of these geese
as in the winter of 1879-1880. The flocks were then composed of thousands of birds, and
when they got up they darkened the sun, at least so the natives said; but when I arrived,
on March 19, not a bird was left. They were destroyed in such numbers that even the
worst shots got more than 200 apiece. They were shot from pits in which the fowlers hid
themselves. Only the down and feathers were made use of.

“ Their flesh is dry and tough, and the majority of the birds were extraordinarily lean.’

“On February 8/20, after a prolonged blizzard from the north, the first example of this
goose was killed in Lenkoran, from a flock of 200 which flew over the town. After deep
snow had fallen, the Tatars set their nets on several pools, and some of these geese were
taken, which I secured, but unfortunately with rather crushed wings. It is. simply
astonishing how quietly and resignedly these birds, as also wild swans, behave immediately
after they have been deprived of their liberty. Their tameness and trustfulness in captivity
are only equalled by their wildness and wariness when free. The Tatars told me that where
these geese had once been taken in nets no others would ever alight. They consider the
red-breasted geese the wisest of all birds. My captives at first commenced to clean and
preen their crumpled feathers, lifting their wings with rather jerky movements, drawing in
their heads as they rested, and ruffling up the silky plumage of their crests and necks.
Thus they stood in the enclosure, from time to time uttering a very short trumpet-like note,
but when any one approached them they began to hiss. They possess the characteristic
dissyllabic goose-cackle, which they employ as a call when seeking each other. I heard it
every time they got separated in the garden and wished to find one another again.”

Dr. Radde further relates how, having become used to their situation, these kazarkas
showed their curiosity and examined the enclosure with stretched-out necks.

“They begin to moult at the end of June.”

Lepekhin says of this species: “It becomes as sociable and accustomed to live in
houses as it is wild and cautious when free. In a week’s time it may be fed from the hand.
Its flesh is not disagreeable, and is excessively fat. Its note is quite distinct from that of the
domesticated goose, and more like that of a sea-gull.”

Ménétriés writes almost the same, but in fewer words, with regard to the ease with

1 Only on this account was their flesh bad; that of fat specimens is very tender and good eating. Dr. Radde also considered the
white-front unsavoury |

Red-breasted Goose 149

| д
which these birds are tamed. There is evidence of their breeding in captivity, and although
they have not reared young in the London Zoological Gardens (according to Dr. Sclater),
they have more than once successfully nested in several other gardens of Western Europe.
Dr. Sclater’ states that a female of this species, acquired in 1853, paired with a Branta
bernicla, but there was no offspring from the union.

From the above it will be seen that we are fairly well acquainted with the winter
haunts of these geese, and their habits in captivity, as well as with the main routes of their

migration, but we have as yet no information about their summer life on the little accessible
tundra of the north.

The reader may see these geese at rest and on the wing, in company with white-fronts,
in Dr. Sushkin’s frontispiece to this book.

1 Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1880, p. 502.

Genus Вуди м, Scopoli (1769)

HEAD with beak and legs black; white upper and under. tail-coverts reaching tips of
tail-feathers.

THE BRENT GOOSE
BRANTA BERNICLA, LINN.
Plate 16

English—Svent-Goose; Brent; Black Goose; Sea-Goose: Bernicle (incorrectly locally) ;
Ware-Goose; Larnacle-Goose (Ireland); Rott-Goose: Rat- Goose; Road-Goose ;

Rood-Goose; Clatter-Goose; Quink Goose; Crocker: H orva-Goose; Hovrie-Goose
(Shetland).

Russian—Chernuaya kazarka (book name); morskaya kazarka (Petersburg); emdk?
(locally, incorrectly); moe (in some authors); us-nemdk; cherny gus
(Turukhansk); vevashka (Pomore, асс. Pleske); ? &lokot (cited by Dal, without
stating to which species it is given; very probably to this).

samoyed—Wurrah (on Kolguev, acc. Trevor-Battye); Pardéu-yeptau (on Pechora, éeste

_ Seebohm); А/М (Taimyr peninsula, Zeste Middendorff).

Yakut—Kara-khdz (on Boganida, = black goose).

German—fingelgans; Rottgans; Meergans; Brantgans: Lrentgans; Klostergans;
Monchgans , Bernikel; Grauente (>.

French—La Cravant; Bernache cravant; Ote cravant, Bernache i collier; ? Ole marine.

Finnish—Sepe-hanki; Musta-hanki (black goose).

Anas бега, Linn., Syst. Nat., 1. р. 198, No. 13, partim (1766).

Brenta, Brisson, Orn., vi. р. 304, pl. xxxi. (1760).

Branta bernicla, Scopoli, Ann. I. H. N., p. 67 (1769); Trumbull, Names and Portraits of Birds, р. 5 (1896?) ;
Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus., xxvii. p. 119 (1895); Ridgway, Man. N. Amer. Birds, р. 119 (1887).

Anser bernicla, Bonnaterre, Encyclop. Méthod., i. р. 121, pl. 32, f 4 (1 790); Kessler, Russk. Orn., p. 368
(1847); Middendorff, Sib. R., И. р. 228, pl. xxi. (pull.) (1851) (Yorma typica et v. glaucogaster).

Anas monachus, Beseke, Убе. Kurl., s. 45, taf. 5 (1 792)

Anser torquatus, Frisch, Убе. Deutschl., И. pl. 156; Маиш., Voég. Deutschl., xi. р. 393, pl. 292 (1842);
Severtsov, Per. Yavl. Zh. Zh. Pt. Voron. gub., p. 226 (1856).

Anser brenta, Pallas (рати), Zoogr. Ross.-As., ii. р. 229 (1811); Seebohm, Hist. Brit. Birds, iii. р. 508, pl. 66
(egg), 1885; Menzbier, Pt. Ross, i. р. 724 (1895); zd, Promysl. Pt. Ross. i Kavkaza, р. 460, pl. 130
(1902); Kholodk. i Silantiev, Ptitsy Vevr., p. 524, pl. 42, fig. 6 (1901); Silantiev, Opred. Yevr. Pt,

1 Nemok is properly the name of the Eastern black kazarka (В. nigricans), a description and figure of which are given in the
present work.

150

Brent Goose 151

р. 112 (1901); Buturlin, Sinopt. tabl. Okh. Pt. Ross. Imp., р. 42 (1901); 24, Dikie Gusi Ross. Imp.,
р. 7 (“ Psov. i Ruzh. Okh.,” Feb.-Apr. 1901); 24, Tabl. opredel. Plastinchatokl. (“ Psov. i Ruzh. Okh.,”
1900); Vavilov, ОКВ, у Ross., iv. (Voda), р. 43, 1873; Sushkin, Pt. Ufimsk. g., р. 67 (1897).

Bernicla torquata, Boie, Isis, 1822, р. 563 ; Newton, Dict. of Birds, р. 375 (1893).

Bernticla brenta, Stephens, Gen. Zool., xii. 2, р. 46 (1824); Baird and Ridgway, Water Birds of М. America, 1.
p. 467 (1884); Coues, Key N. Amer. Birds, 2 ed., p. 687, fig. p. 686 (1884); Shelley, Birds of Egypt,
р. 281 (1872); Biichner and Pleske, Beitr. Ornit. S.-P. С. No. 179 (1881); Biichner, Pt. Spb.
sub., р. 513 (1884); von Heuglin, J. Е Orn. 1871, р. 164 (Spitzbergen) ; zd, J. Е Orn., 1872, р. 120
(Novaia Zemlia) ; Sabaneev, Ukazat. Kn. i St. ОКБ. i Zool. Soderzh., pp. 455-458 (1883) (p70 parte) ;
Pleske, Убе. Kola Hlbns., р. 245 (1886); MHeuglin, J. Е Orn, 1872, р. 120 (Novaia Zemlia) ;
Gillett, Ibis, 1870, р. 308 (Novaia Zemlia); Pleske, Krit. Obz. Ml. i Pt. Kolsk. pol-va, р. 347
(1887); Alphéraky, Kuldzka i Tian-shan, р. 67 (oz. Sairam) (1891); Smirnov, Orn. Jahrb., xii. 1901,
pt. 6, p. 208; Trevor-Battye, Ice-bound on Kolguev, pp. 197, 224, 226, 257, 300, 424 (1895);
Pearson, Beyond Petsora, 314 (absence on Novaia Zemlia) (1899); Macpherson, History of Fowling,
EO OZ. р. Е.

Bernicla glaucogaster, Brehm, Isis, 1830, р. 996; 24., Handb. Убе. Deutschl., р. 849 (1831).

Lernicla micropus, Brehm, Isis, 1830, р. 996.

Lernicla platyuros, Brehm, Isis, 1830, р. 996.

Lernicla collaris, Brehm, Isis, 1830, р. 996.

Bernicla melanopsis, Macgillivray, Man. Br. Orn., ii. р. 151 (1842).

Lernicla pallida, Brehm, Vogelf., р. 368 (1855).

Bernicla brenta and glaucogaster, Bonaparte, Compt.-Rend., xliii. р. 648 (1856).

Brenthus bernicla, Heuglin, Reise Nordpolarmeer, iii. р. 132 (1874).

Anser (Brenthus) torquatus, Reichenow., Orn. Centralbl., 1882, р. 37.

Anser brenta glaucogaster, Seebohm, Hist. Brit. Birds, iii. р. 508 (1885).

Branta brenta, Dubois, Faun. Belg. Ois., ii. р. 388, pl. 243 (1892); Taczanowski, Е. Orn. >. Or, р. 1104
(1893). |

Anser brenta leucogaster (lapsus calami), Меп ег, Pt. Ross., i. р. 724 (1895).

ADULT FEMALES AND MALES

Head, neck, and breast smoky black. On sides of upper half of neck (where tufts
of feathers, separated by furrows, are less strongly marked than in grey-lags or representa-
tives of genus MZelanonyx) lies a small white patch, consisting of stripes or streaks, more or
less scattered. Sometimes, but comparatively rarely, these white patches almost meet on the

anterior surface of the neck.’ Brown blackish-grey colouring of back interrupted by very
narrow greyish edgings of feathers; rarely (perhaps in younger, although mature birds?)
these greyish edgings with a rusty or coffee tint. Belly and flanks also brown-grey, with
greyish edgings to feathers wider than at back, these edgings posteriorly becoming wider
and lighter.

Rump and tail black-brown; latter consisting ordinarily of 16 feathers, but some-
times, according to Naumann, of 18—a number which I have not seen. Tail-coverts, both
upper and lower, and vent pure white. Tail-coverts reaching tips of tail-feathers, so that the
tail, from above and below, appears white, the dark outer tail-feathers being visible only
laterally.

Upper wing-coverts, as also primary coverts, grey-brown; under wing-coverts and
axillaries brown blackish grey. Alulz and all flight-feathers very dark brown-black, with
white shafts to feathers in basal third. Secondaries considerably darker than others. Bill
black ; iris brown-black ; eyelids black, alike on the feathered and the unfeathered part.
Legs, feet, and claws black, with greenish or olive tint on surface of digits and on bend of
heel-joint. Female, as in all geese, somewhat less in size than male, but difference slight.

1 If we raise, at the level of these white patches, the more elongated black plumules of the back of the neck, and also anteriorly

(where the black plumules are not elongated), we find here also white spots more or less developed, so that a complete white ring may
always be traced round the neck, although composed of discrete white spots,

Io Geese of Europe and Asia

The material at my disposal, however, was not sufficient to establish the extremes of
the dimensions for the two sexes.

Total length, & and $. ; , 584—889 mm. (= 23.50—30.50 in.),
Wing, ; ; 312—345 mm. (= 12.30—13.60 in.),
Culmen . : 30—38 mm. (= 1.20—1.50 in.),
Tarsus. ; ’ 53—бт mm. (= 2.10—2.40 in.).

The number of teeth on each side of the upper mandible is 28-30 in the examples |
have examined, but perhaps these are not the extreme limits.

YOUNGER ADULTS

General colouring somewhat lighter than in old birds. Often rufous or coffee tint.
on edgings of feathers of upper surface ; white patches on sides of neck less developed.

Younc Birps IN First PLUMAGE

White patches on sides of neck absent ; breast scarcely darker than belly and flanks,
and latter without light edgings to feathers; lesser wing-coverts with conspicuous light
greyish edgings; median and greater wing-coverts with very light whitish edgings. Inner
secondaries with greyish-white tips.

YOUNG IN Down

Above dark grey, below greyish white, without any yellowish tint; cheeks and throat
whitish ; end of nail on upper mandible whitish (Middendorff).

The above descriptions concern the dresses of the typical form of this goose, from
which the following form, Sranta bernicla glaucogaster, differs apparently only by the
colouring of the under surface of the body, and its somewhat different range, which will be
discussed in its proper place. On account, however, of the difficulty of distinguishing to
which of two races of brent (so often confounded by authors), many statements refer,
I have cited the whole at the beginning of the present notice.

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

The breeding-grounds of this goose at the present day nowhere extend south of the
Arctic circle. The species is credibly known to nest eastwards on the Taimyr peninsula, but
as to the still more easterly part of Siberia we cannot yet say where it meets the black
brent, although it is quite possible that, before this sees the light, Baron Toll’s expedition to
the New Siberian Islands will have thrown considerable light on this question.1 In the
Taimyr peninsula this brent has been found on the eastern coast in 77° N. lat.; on the
western, between 75° and 763° М. lat.; on the river Boganida in 70°, and on the river
Taimyr in 733° №. lat. On the Yenisei it has not yet been found south of 72° М. lat.,
where Mr. Popham obtained young in down. To the west of this point it doubtless breeds
over the whole tundra to the Kaninsk peninsula, although there are no trustworthy data on
the subject. It nests in Novaia Zemlia and Kolguev, where it breeds in large numbers, and
probably for the most part in the north-eastern part of the former island. Farther north it

1 Birulya, the naturalist of the expedition, has brought a black brant from these islands (1904).

Brent Goose 152

breeds in Franz-Josef Land and in Spitzbergen. It is quite possible that it may also prove
to be a nesting-bird in Iceland, although it has not yet been recorded as such.

The breeding-places of this goose authentically recorded are thus very few in
comparison with the incredible number of individuals met with in its winter haunts, and
this confirms my idea that other vast nesting-grounds must lie between the Yenisei on the
west, the Yalmal, and the Kaninsk peninsula—along the shore of the Arctic Ocean.

This species winters mainly on the shores of North Germany, Denmark, Holland,
Belgium, Northern France, Great Britain, and even Portugal. At times it descends south
to the Atlantic coast of Morocco, where it is perhaps even a regular winter visitor. It is
also very probable that it winters in small numbers on the Faroes, where it is a common
bird of passage. In winter it is met with at various points in the Mediterranean basin and
in Lower Egypt.

The migratory routes of this species are described by Professor Menzbier as follows :
“The brent undoubtedly breeds on Kolguev and Novaia Zemlia, and perhaps on Vaigach.
It arrives there by two routes—namely, the Norwegian, from the side of the Varanger-fjord,
following the coast of the Kola peninsula to Kaninsk and thence to Vaigach and Novaia
Zemlia, and also from the side of the Baltic. The latter line begins at the southern end of
the Baltic with two branches, one going over Lifland and the Peipus to the Gulf of
Finland, the other leading to the same point by the Estland coast. After crossing the
Gulf of Finland, the brents collect on the Aland Islands and Nyland coast, and thence strike
across the lake region for the White Sea, avoiding Archangel, where a stray specimen of this
bird is only rarely met with. Having reached the throat of the White Sea, the flocks
proceed along the eastern coast of the Kola peninsula, through Ponsi, Tri Ostrova, Sosnovets,
Morzhovets, and then make for Novaia Zemlia.”

This sketch of the migration is perhaps quite true, but it seems certain that not all
‘the brents travelling by the Baltic shore turn off to Vaigach and Novaia Zemlia, a large
number of them passing straight over Finland and Lake Ladoga eastwards, while others
probably go direct by the mainland to the Taimyr peninsula. At any rate I have
myself (during the autumn passage) observed for several years running, and have even
shot, brent flying straight from east to west from Lake Ladoga across the lakes of the
Vyborg Government in a vast number of large flocks. It is true I have not seen their
return passage by the same route in spring, but, according to the statements of the natives,
a migration occurs every year from west to east in the month of May. It is undoubtedly
owing to this line of migration that the bird is met with on passage about Turukhansk * and
in the Governments of Perm and Ufa. In September the “sea kazarkas,” as they are called
on the coast, appear near St. Petersburg,’ and somewhat later cross Scandinavia in a south-
westerly direction. By this route from the Taimyr peninsula, I assume, they stray into
the interior of European Russia, as in the Moscow Government (Lorenz) and Poland
(Taczanowski). Such visitations (or more properly migrations) almost substantiate, I think,
Professor Menzbier’s hypothesis that this goose ‘‘ perhaps gets to the Black Sea in winter.”
As regards the Caspian, I have been unable to find any indications of its appearance, even as
a straggler, at that season.

In September or the beginning of October, the geese flying over the Baltic and
through Scandinavia begin to occur in ever-increasing numbers off the coasts of Jutland, in

1 Called in Pallas’s times Mangazeya, a name often mentioned in his works.
2 The passage occurs also in October; the spring return passage is in April and May.

154 Geese of Europe and Asia

Schleswig-Holstein, where they collect in countless hordes; they also appear along the
shores of the North Sea, and in vast crowds on the coasts of Holland, Belgium, and Northern
France. Considerably later, as we shall see below, these geese occur on the seas around
Great Britain. They winter some years in millions on the northern coasts of France, “ where
the notes of countless flocks,” says Naumann, “drown the roar of the waves, and where
their swarms from afar darken the light like smoke.”

In concluding this review of the geographical distribution of the present species, |
may once more remark that there are two great gaps in our knowledge of its breeding and
wintering in Russia, namely, as regards its nidification on the shore of the Arctic Ocean
between the Kaninsk peninsula and the Yenisei, and its wintering on the Black Sea. Until
these gaps are filled up, much in the lines of migration of this bird must remain quite
unintelligible. |

It is а somewhat curious fact that we know scarcely anything at all about the habits
of this goose in Russia, and that the little which has of late been learned has not been
acquired by Russian subjects. Much interesting information about its mode of life on
Kolguev has been supplied by Mr. Trevor-Battye, who writes as follows: “I never saw the
nest or egg of a Kolguev brent. No inducement which I was able to offer to the Samoyeds
could extract from them any information as to the breeding-places of the birds, until the
Russians arrived in August, and with their help I got from Uano a reluctant admission that
they nested on the southern and north-eastern ends of theisland. They hold the bird in almost
superstitious regard because of its extreme importance to them as winter food. I believe
that they themselves never approach the breeding-grounds during nesting-time. For this
they gave as their reason that a dog or a gun would make them all desert. The Samoyed
dogs are encouraged as bird-hunters, and a Samoyed cannot understand that it is possible to
go out without such companions.

“The only reason I have, then, for assuming that the brent goose nests on Kolguev is
the word of the natives and the appearance of vast numbers of old and young birds off the
sandbanks in July.”

A little farther on the same writer makes an important and perfectly new statement
regarding these geese, thereby enriching the ornithological fauna of the district by a new
form. ‘Of the adults, two forms were clearly distinguishable. In the majority the lower
breast and belly were slaty,! but a large proportion had these parts light as mother-of-pearl ; *
and there were some old birds in which the light fringe of the slate-coloured breast-feathers
was so wide that the bird could not easily be referred to either category. In one bird, a male,
in my possession, the neck and the tail-feathers are light brown; apart from this, it may
almost be called a white bird.”

Of the nidification of this goose we have very incomplete information. The nest is
very simply constructed, as indeed is the case with all geese; the material used being leaves,
grass, dry water-weeds, and, of course, a lining of down and feathers. Some ornithologists
consider that the number of eggs in a clutch is usually four, but it undoubtedly often reaches
six, and even nine. Although they usually build their nests on the ground, yet it sometimes
happens, as, for example, in Spitzbergen, that these geese nest on rocks in the neighbour-
hood of the nests of eider-ducks. The eggs have a thin shell, and are either delicate straw

1 де. Branta bernicla, the typical form.
2 z.e. the light-bellied form, Branta bernicla glaucogaster.

Brent Goose res

or greenish white in colour. According to Mr. Gobel, the eggs of the black-legged geese in
the structure of the shell approach those of the ducks. The following are the dimensions
for this species :—

Diameter . , ; A6—56 mm. (= 1.81—2.20 in.).
Length=- =; ; 66-74 „ (=2.59-2.91 , ).

But Mr. Gobel gave me the annexed table of measurements and weights, based,
unfortunately, on only six examples, so that it seems we are still far from knowing the
extreme dimensions and weight of the eggs of this goose.

Max. breadth 51 mm. (=2 in.), with 79 mm. length (= 3.11 in.), and 714 cgrm. weight (Spitzbergen).

Min. т а О с а я > ? 5 „ (Greenland).

Mapes ООО о ба 2 пе Де » (Ори2Бегоей

Min. ‚> 7 I >, ( = 2.79 „> ), ‚> 46 oy) ” ( я 1.81 ” ), р ” ” (Greenland).

Max. weight 756 cgrm., with 48 mm. (=1.88 in.) breadth, and 72 mm. length ( = 2.83 in.) (Spitzbergen).

Min. ,, бу Е eae Sees es a cases » (=2.89 ,, ) (Malyya Karmokuly).

6 examples gave: mean breadth 48 mm.( = 1.89 in.); max. breadth 51 mm.(=2 in.) ; min. breadth46 mm. ( = 1.8 111.).

” » А, о ее.
3 D р » weight 715 cgrm. ; „ weight 756 cerm. ; „ weight 678 cerm.

On July 15 Middendorff found on the river Taimyr goslings which had only just
left the egg (he gives a figure), but in some places, as, ¢.g., on Kolguev, they are evidently
hatched rather earlier. It is probable that, during the moulting of the old birds, when the
Samoyeds catch them in large numbers by driving them into nets, a vast number of young in
down, or those which are beginning to get their feathers, perish. Of the summer life of this
species we know nothing.

So far as may be judged from existing data, brent geese, like ducks and many other
birds, do not always nest from year to year in the same spots. Middendorff, for example,
tells us that his interpreter met with brent breeding in large numbers on the river Pyasina
at the time of his first expedition, but on the second he found red-breasted geese and
barnacles (BL. deucopsis), and especially greater and lesser white-fronted geese, but no brent. A
similar circumstance occurs in Novaia Zemlia, where this goose certainly nests, although
Messrs. Pearson and Fielden did not find it there in either 1895 or 1897.

If the spring and summer life of these geese is almost unknown, the same cannot be
said with regard to their life and habits in some of their winter resorts. At the latter season
all their habits have indeed been studied in detail by sportsmen, since the brent, on account
of its abundance, the excellent quality of its flesh, and the difficulty of securing it, is one of
the species most sought after by wild-fowlers. It is, however, almost impossible to recount
all the details and niceties of this attractive sport recorded in literature; and this special
branch of sea-coast shooting can scarcely be said to be known in Russia.

As I have given a short sketch on the subject in my (И Rossit, I will now content
myself with quoting from various authors descriptions of the habits and г of these geese in
their winter haunts.

One of the best observers and authorities on wild-fowl in England, and a most
experienced sportsman, Mr. Abel Chapman, writes as follows in his excellent 47t of
Wildfowling —

156 Geese of Europe and Asia

“These geese are the latest to arrive of all our winter wild-fowl. The average date for
their appearance in force (on the N.E. coast) falls after Christmas. Though stragglers may
come in November, one cannot rely on having them here in numbers before January, and
in some seasons much later. Thus during the present winter (1896) the chief arrival occurred
in the second week of February; and in the memorable season of 1886 we had very few till as
late as March, when they came in quite unprecedented numbers, as I have elsewhere described.
An excellent general index of their abundance or scarcity on our coast is afforded by the state
of the ice in the Sound at Copenhagen and in the Cattegat, which information is daily
reported at the season in the shipping newspapers.”

In another paragraph the same author writes as follows :—

“To return to our geese. To such spots, where miles of mudflats flank the land,
and dreary sand-dunes separate the slob from the sea beyond, thither flock the brents in black
battalions at break of day. By companies and detachments they come in from the sea,
clanging down a wild chorus as they speed through the upper air towards green oozes where
the Zostera carpets the mud with emerald fronds. Black forward and white astern are their
predominant colours, and as they lower their flight the long files, now low on the water,
resemble giant centipedes crawling along. Now watch them whirl in air like a black swarm
of bees, though always maintaining their chain-like formations; to and fro they wheel over
their chosen feeding-ground in a hundred concentric, opposing circles, then with a crash of
bird-music and flapping of dark pinions the whole host is down. Full five hundred
have pitched on the green spit before us, a second company in the bight beyond; but the
main army is still on wing. We can see them still flying inwards, bound for the big
banks six miles up the estuary.

‘The geese at once commence their breakfast; with the glass you can see them
all a-guzzle, their black necks down as they advance, tearing up and devouring the
trailing blades of sea-grass. For some two hours they will remain intent on breakfast ;
then one will see little parties going off to drink, splash, and preen in the nearest
channel. The mid-day interlude follows, when, should the weather be mild, the whole
company indulge for a few hours in rest and play, chasing one another till the water
flies, while the volume of sound is a thing to be remembered ; not even parliaments are
in it with wild geese. Towards afternoon they are hungry again, and feed with desperate
energy as the sun lowers to ‘take the hill,’ for then they know that the time is at hand
when they must clear out in one great sonorous host—all bands playing—bound for the
open sea.”

I find the most varied attempts made by different authors to represent phonetically
the call of this goose, but although I have often heard the cry of migrating flocks, I cannot
undertake to express it in syllables. It differs greatly from the notes of all the species not
possessing black feet, and is perhaps softer, more melodious, and less loud than in the
white-fronted or yellow-billed groups; but from the number of individuals in a flock there
arises a chaotic ceaseless din so characteristic that, once heard, will not be forgotten.
Some compare the notes of a flock of brent on the wing with those of a pack of hounds
in full cry, and perhaps with some justice. I was once at early dawn very near (some
200 paces) a flock of about two thousand of these geese, flying towards my _ boat.
I was already approaching the shelter prepared beforehand on the lake, and had only
I5 ОГ 20 paces yet to row, when this mass of birds in full clang began to descend upon
me, evidently with the view of alighting at the very same spot. My heart beat quicker as

Brent Goose 157

the unwonted sight fell upon my eyes, and I was already hoping, as I lay motionless in my
boat, that the geese would settle and allow me first to admire them and then to bag a few.
They were already falling from a great height, turning and twisting in the air like teal, and
keeping up an uninterrupted cackle; but the leaders detected me, and at once the whole
flock, as if influenced by a powerful gust of wind, swerved aside, began again to soar,
and eventually left the lake. Then it was, when those many hundred throats were calling
near me in the silent morning air, when every sound is borne so clearly over the water,
that Г realised how far removed is the note of these geese from the loud shrill cry of other
species I had heard.

What would have been my impression hada flock of yellow-billed or white-fronted
geese flown towards me in like numbers? The cry of the brent seemed feeble, although
fairly musical. And I thought that it would indeed require “countless flocks” ‘to
drown the roar of the waves.” I shall never forget the feeling of excitement, followed by
disappointment, aroused that morning by the brent which, alas! I am not likely ever to
meet again in like circumstances.

In the following notice of the light-bellied race of this goose I take occasion to touch
once more on the typical form, and thus complete the foregoing account.

THE LIGHT-BELLIED BRENT
BRANTA BERNICLA GLAUCOGASTER, BREHM

Plate. 17

English—Light-bellied Brent; in North America—Bvant, Brent, Brand Goose, Common
Brant, etc. |
Russian—Belobryukhaya chernaya kazarka and hazarka belobryukhaya (J. A. Buturlin).

I have given the synonyms of the light-bellied brent under the head of the typical
brent, because the former can scarcely be regarded otherwise than as a dimorphous form of
Branta bernicla, and also because by many authors it has been confounded with the latter.
I therefore here indicate only the works of those authors who record it as a distinct form,
and of those who undoubtedly had specimens before them, although they did not regard
them as distinct.

Brent, Trevor-Battye, Ice-Bound on Kolguev (1895).

Anser bernicla (partim), Middendorff, Sib. R., И. р. 288 (1851).

Anser glaucogaster (Brehm), Buturlin, Dikie gusi R. I. (“Psov. i Ruzh. Okhota,” вебе pi. 1 901) = 2%,
Tablitsy apred. Plastinch. (“ Psov. 1 Ruzh. Okh.,” 1900); 24, Sinoptich. tabl. Okh. Pt. R. L, р. 41
(1901); Menzbier, Pt. Rossii, i. p. 724 (1895).

Branta bernicla glaucogaster, Bianchi, Yezhegodn. Zool. Muz. Imp. Ak. Nauk., 1902, pp. 325 and 333.

ADULT BIRDS OF Вотн SEXES

These are distinguished from the typical form only by the light mother-of-pearl
greyish belly and flanks with admixture of ochreous-brownish tint; but according to Mr.
Trevor-Battye perfectly intermediate examples occur which it is impossible to assign to
their proper form. Upper part of body apparently in general somewhat lighter than in the
majority of the typical form.

OTHER DRESSES

Correspond to those of brent, but at all ages lighter belly. Dimensions coincide
with those of B. devutcla, viz. :— :

Length . , 596—774 mm. (= 23.5—30.5 in.).
Wing, : : ; 309—345 mm. ( = 12.30—13.6 in.).
Culmen . ; 304-38 mm. (=1.20-1.5 in.).
Tarsus. : 53-61 mm. (= 2.1—2.4 in.).
Eggs: width . : : A : Simm. 202)

ее length . 74 mm. (2.92 in.).

158

Light-bellied Brent 159

(GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

In addition to Russia, the light-bellied brent occurs in Eastern Arctic America from
Parry Island to Greenland inclusive, and from 73° N. Lat. northwards “as far as land is
found.” It is also met with as a winter straggler in the Mississippi valley. In Europe it
has been found locally, wintering with the typical form, but in far less numbers. In Russia
it was found by Middendorff, who also did not recognise it, on the western part of the
Taimyr peninsula, by Mr. Trevor-Battye in Kolguev, and by Messrs. Fielden and Brown in
Novaia Zemlia, the specimen from the latter locality being distinguished by the white spots
becoming confluent on the anterior surface of the neck.

I have only seen one example of this bird of Russian origin, which was brought by
Middendorff from the Taimyr peninsula, and I am able to state that it agrees in colouring
with the drawing on Plate 17. We may thus consider with certainty that the Kolguev and
Novaia Zemlia birds do not essentially differ from the one figured, although the latter was
obtained in April 1889 on the island of Monomoi, in the State of Massachusetts. I cannot,
however, decide whether there are any differences between the European and the American
В. bernicla glaucogaster, since I have not had a single example of the latter in my hands.
It would be no less important to examine the intermediate forms between the light-belly and
the brent which Mr. Trevor-Battye writes of in his book on Kolguev, but it seems that this
author did not bring back any specimens. My hopes of receiving Kolguev examples from
Mr. Buturlin, who made a scientific expedition to that island in 1902, have also not been
realised, as that talented and energetic naturalist arrived on Kolguev after the geese had
finished moulting, and was then too late for the great catch of moulting birds by the
Samoyeds; such fledged brent аз he shot proved to be of the typical form.

The simultaneous occurrence on Kolguev of the typical and the light-bellied forms,
that is, of two distinct races of one species, is at first sight a very unusual circumstance,
but analogous instances are known among insects. Apparently we may have either
(т) dimorphous forms. of one species, or (2) two separate independent species, breeding
together and producing as the result of crossing those intergrading examples of which Mr.
Trevor-Battye speaks. The latter supposition is, however, in itself but little probable, since,
beyond the substitution of light for slate colouring on the under surface of the body, no
difference exists between these газ. The first hypothesis, viz. that B. elaucogaster is a
simple dimorphous form, as it seems to me, explains very simply the circumstance of these
geese being found breeding together. Among Lepidoptera I know cases where, for
example, a certain species is dimorphous in one locality (sometimes only with the males,
at others only with the females), while in other places the same species may appear in one
or other of its forms as a permanent variety or sub-species.

Thus there is a species of butterfly of the genus Lycena, in which in a certain
locality the males are dimorphous—some with brown wings, others with blue; while all
the females are uniformly brown. In other localities this same species shows a mono-
morphous male, for example, with brown, and elsewhere with blue wings; and this
phenomenon is permanent.

The same is the case, I think, with this goose, which is dimorphous in Kolguev,

1 Which still requires further investigation, at present impossible from the lack of material for comparison, with the exception of
the Taimyr skin of the light-bellied example.

бо Geese of Europe and Asia

Novaia Zemlia, and Taimyr, and polymorphous (only in its light-bellied form) in North
America and Greenland.

How, then, are we to explain the phenomenon that on Kolguev and other northern
localities the two forms of the species occur together, while only one of them—the light-
bellied goose—is peculiar to North-East America and Greenland?

It seems to me the explanation of this fact is not so difficult as may at first appear;
and I think that at one time in both the Old and the New World the two forms were met
with, and that while in America and Greenland, by means of crossing, the light-bellied
gradually got the better of the dark-bellied form (absorbed or amalgamated it), just the
opposite condition took place over the greater part of the range of this species in the Old
World, where undoubtedly the dark-bellied form now predominates. In Kolguev, however,
and probably in Novaia Zemlia, the struggle between the differently coloured representatives
of the one species still continues, and probably one will ultimately absorb the other.

At one time I explained the geographical distribution of dimorphous forms in the
Lepidoptera somewhat differently." I considered, for instance, that a species, the home or
centre of distribution of which was a particular locality, became dimorphous or even ро|у-
morphous, and afterwards only spread gradually to new localities in one or other of its forms,
according as this was better adapted to exist in the new surroundings. The explanation I
here give of the fact of the occurrence of one form only of РБ. dernicfa in America and
Greenland, and of two ‘forms of that species in the Old World, seems, however, to be
perfectly applicable to the case cited of the range of various forms of one species among the
Lepidoptera, or, in other words, that the particular species of the genus Lycena was
dimorphous or trimorphous over the whole extent of its range, but that little by little one or
other form, according to its greater fitness, has absorbed the other, and that in the localities
where dimorphous forms are now met with, the struggle between them still continues, and
will terminate in favour of the one best adapted for continuous existence.

If it should eventually prove that the light-bellied brent is not simply a dimorphous
form of the common brent, but an independent species (which I consider unlikely), even
then, in consequence of the occurrence of both together and their interbreeding (as shown
by the intergrading forms in Kolguev), it would be impossible to doubt the existence of a
struggle between them of long standing, and destined inevitably to end in the triumph of
one of the two, just as a struggle has been and is still maintained locally between grey and
black crows.

The appearance on the coasts of England of the light-bellied form of the brent,
formerly explained by its coming from Greenland to winter, may now be more simply
accounted for by its breeding in Spitzbergen, Kolguev, Novaia Zemlia, and farther east-
wards to the Taimyr peninsula inclusive. This question is not yet matured, however, for
final decision, as it is first of all necessary to ascertain whether the Russian are identical
with the North American and Greenland birds, and if this should prove not to be the case,
whether the British birds can be identified with one or the other.

Notwithstanding, then, the probability that it is the Russian light-bellied brent that
winters in British waters, this question cannot be regarded as strictly answered, and
therefore still remains open.

1 See article in the Transactions of the Entom. Soc. Lond. 1901, pt. iv., “Оп some Cases of Dimorphism and Polymorphism
among Palzearctic Lepidoptera,” by 5. Alphéraky.

Light-bellied Brent 161

Sir К. Payne-Gallwey, writing of these two forms of brent, observes that, “Т have
shot a great many adult brent with (1) the lower part of the breast and the abdomen pure
white ; (2) with these parts of very dark slate, almost as dark аз the neck; (3) with a dark
breast and abdomen and a patch of white, the size of the hand, on the lower part of the
breast. On the British coast I have often killed specimens of both the white and the dark-
bellied variety at the same shot. On the shores of North Holland you may shoot an entire
winter and not kill, or even see, a brent with a white abdomen; whilst on an estuary in
France, out of many hundreds killed last season (1896), by a gentleman-gunner, only one
bird had white under-parts.”

These last facts seem to indicate the appearance in English waters of light-bellied
brent from Greenland, which do not get so far аз France and Holland; but what we have
learnt from Mr. A. Chapman in the last section clearly testifies that the arrival of brent in
England is generally dependent on the state of the ice and weather in the Sound. All this
taken together, and the question as to the winter haunts of the brent from Spitzbergen and
Franz-Josef Land, so far from clearing, still further complicate the matter. :

Г hope that my statements of the circumstances requiring explanation in the
geographical distribution of this form of brent will not be overlooked by such persons as
may be in a position, and who may possess the material, to help to make things clearer than
they are at present.

In the plates of bills I have not figured those of the light-bellied and black-bellied
forms of the brent, since they do not present any differences.

The present notice was completed when there appeared Mr. V. L. Bianchi’s work in
the Yezhegoduik Zoologicheskaya muzeya Akademii Nauk, 1902, in which (р. 325) the
author speaks of four examples of this goose obtained on Spitzbergen by Mr. A. A. Byalnitsky
Birulei and Dr. Bunge of the Russian expedition of 1899-1901, and of an egg brought from
Hornsund.

Unfortunately the author does not state whether the skins brought from Spitzbergen
completely agree in colouring with the Branta bernicla glaucogaster of Arctic America, or with
the one example brought by Middendorff from the Taimyr peninsula.

EEE ВЕКЕ Е
BRANTA BERNICLA NIGRICANS, LAWRENCE
Plate 18

English—Black Brent (М. Am.); Eskimo Goose (Fort Yukon).

Russian—WVemok (Pallas, Krasheninnikov); мета (Pallas; probably genitive of nemdk?);
polyarny виз’ (Polyakov); azarka chernaya amerikanskaya (Menzbier);
kazarka chernaya stbirskaya, and osheitntkovaya kasarka (Buturlin) ; gus nembk

(Maak).
Yakut—Kharder-khaaz ог Khardyr-khaazg Oils Lena and Vilyui, feste Pallas and Maak).
Kamchadal— 7erad (Krasheninnikov).
Kuril—Viikespu. |
Koryak—Vechépoal.
Lamut—Karkali. |

Anas bernicla, Pennant (mec Linn.), Cook’s Voy. Расй, ii. р. 366 (Kamchatka), 1784.

Anser brenta, Pallas, Zoogr. Ross.-As., ii. р. 229 (partim), 1811.

Anser nigricans, Lawrence, Ann. Гус. М. York, iv. р. 171, pl. xii. (1846); Seebohm, Hist. Brit. Birds, Ш. р. 508
(1885); Menzbier, Pt. Ross. 1. р. 725 (1895); Buturlin, Dikie Gusi Ross. Imp. (“ Zh. Psov. i Ruzh.

Okh.,” 1901); 24, separ. р. 8; 24, Sinopt. Tabl. ОКВ. Pt. Ross. Imp. 1901, р. 42; 24, Tabl. Opred.
Plast. (“ Psov. i Ruzh. Okh.,” 1900); 24., separ., р. 6.

Anas brenta, Sevast., Opis. Kamch. by ах, 1. р. 474 (note) 1818.

Lernicla nigricans, Guy. Genera of Birds, App., р. 27. (1849) ; Nikolsky, Ostr. Sakhalin, p. 225 (1887);
Baird and Ridgway, Water-Birds of N. America, i. p. 471 (1884); Macpherson, History of Fowling,
L667, p=220)

Anas bernicla, Kittl., Denku., ii. р. 384 (1858).

Anser bernicla (partim), Schlegel, Mus. P.-B., Amseres, р. 103 (1866); Dobrotworski, Tzr. Spb. Otd. Geogr. Obshch.,
i. р. 23 (1870); Miculs, Ocherk Sakhalina, Pril. К. Selokokhoz. i Lesov., pt. 114, р. 43 (1873); Maak,
Amur, Pribavl., p. 144, No. 180 (1859).

Branta nigricans, Bonnaterre, Proc. Ac. Philad., 1870, р. 131; Stejneger, Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. No. 29, р. 149
(1885); Ridgway, Man. №. Amer. Birds, р. 118 (1887); Stejneger, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., x. р. 135
(Bering Isl.), 1887; Menzbier, Okh.-Kamchat. Krai, Dra. Slyunina, р. 346 (1900); Salvadori, Cat.
Birds Brit. Mus., xxvii. p. 123 (1895).

Branta bernicla, var. nigricans, Coues, Key to М. Amer. Birds, р. 294, fie, 184, b. (1872).

Branta bernicla, d. nigricans, Coues, Birds of North-West, p. 557 (1874).

Branta brenta nigricans, Taczanowski, Faune Orn. Sib. Or., р. 1106 (1893).

Lernicla torquata, Black. and Pryer, Ibis, 1878, р. 212 (Japan).

Bernicla brenta nigricans, Coues, Check-list of М. Amer. Birds, 2nd ed., р. 112 (1882), Palmen, Bidr. Sibiresk.
Ishafsk. Fogelf. Vega-Exp., pl. vii. p. 426.

Anser (Brenthus) nigricans, Reichenow, Orn. Centralbl., 1882, р. 3.

Веги brenta, var. nigricans, Seebohm, Ibis, 1884, р. 32 (Japan).

Anser torquatus, Brandt, J. Е. Orn., 1891, р. 267.

Bernicla brenta, Polyakov, Otchet obizsted. na Sakhaline, Pril. No. 6, pl. xlviii. Zap. Imper. Akad. Nauk,
1384, р. 12.

62g Se a eee
' Izsledovaniya na ostr. Sakhaline, “ Vladivostok,” 188 3; NNT, 335:
162

Black Brent 162

-ApULT Birps oF Вотн SEXES

Colouring as in ordinary brent (Bvanta bernicla), but on the whole considerably
darker and blacker. Bill said to be somewhat more massive and broader at the base,
although I cannot confirm this, as I have not found these differences in dry skins, but my
material was small. |

_ On neck a white collar, much broader than in common brent, and always closed in
front, and almost always so behind; I have, however, met with examples, perhaps not very
old, but apparently adult, in which the junction of the white collar behind was incomplete,
but became so only on raising the elongated black plumes of the neck.

Head, neck, upper part of body and breast, very dark brown-black; under-part of
body, that is, belly and flanks, dead black, almost indistinguishable from black of breast,
but still more sharply contrasted with the pure white of the hind part of belly and vent.
Both upper and under tail-coverts, which completely reach the tips of the brown-black tail
feathers, pure white. Soft-parts black, as in common brent, and under-part of wings as in
latter, but slightly darker.

‘Length | : 560—730 mm, (= 22—29 in.).
Wing . eet | ’ т | 330—350 mm. (= 13—13.758 in.).
Culmen : 30—36 mm. (= 1.20—1.35 in.).
Tarsus . 56—66 mm. (= 2.20—2.50 in.).

Weight from 34 > 5 Е. he on probably о rather more.

Younc BIRDs

Colouring as in adults, but white collar obscurely marked and totally wanting in birds
‚ in first plumage. Greater wing-coverts and secondaries with white tips; feathers on flanks
entirely greyish brown without white tips (Ridgway). |

As is apparent from this description, neither dimensions nor any other essential
characters, with the exception, perhaps, of a rather more massive oe : ede Wer this bird
from the common brent.

| On the other hand, it is sharply and constantly differentiated from the latter by the
very broad collar always well closed in front (and often behind) and by the black belly and
flanks matching the breast. And since these two characters are, it seems, constant, this
form is very distinct and easily separated from Виа а bernicla, but nevertheless only as a
variety. Some examples of the typical form, and also of the light-bellied variety (ВБ. dernicla
glaucogaster) also sometimes have the white patches on the sides of the neck meeting in
front, but this is only as a rare exception, clearly, as it seems to me, pointing to the specific
relationship of all three forms of brent. The completely isolated geographical distribution of
B. nigricans alone sharply separates it from the two others.

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

The range of the nemok is by no means difficult to work out. The Arctic zone
from the Lena to the extreme east of the Asiatic shore and (passing over the islands in

1 Although Taczanowski speaks of the more massive bill of this form, this is not borne out by the dimensions he gives, so that it is
desirable to obtain accurate measurements of bills from freshly killed birds, |

164 Geese of Europe and Аза

Bering Sea) the western Arctic portion of North America form the nesting-ground of this
brent. Of its nidification to the west of the Lena there are as yet no indications.

This brent descends to winter along the eastern coast of the Asiatic continent and
the adjacent islands to Japan, and along the western coast of North America to Lower
California, sometimes even straying south to the Laysan Islands, and even Maui, where an
example was procured in т8от.!

| As а very rare straggler, it has been recorded from the eastern coast of North
America (Long Island). |

“The migration routes of the black-bellied brent in East Siberia,” writes Maak,
“as likewise its manner of life there, are entirely unknown, пог is there any wealth of
information as to its habits in North America. From the statements of fowlers these
birds appear about the Yakutsk with the breaking-up of the ice on the Lena, and as they
fly very low on passage, especially towards evening, they are then massacred in large
numbers.

“Оп the Lena, at the mouth of the Lunka, the first skein showed itself on May 13;
and the arrival continued about five days. Farther inland from the Lena these geese
occur very rarely, a fact confirmed by the Yakuts.

“Оп the Amur, in the mountains of the Khingan range, in 48° М. lat., I saw great
flocks of this species from September 13 to 16, flying south; and also after noticed them
on sandbanks, where they spent the night.”

Mr. A. M. Nikolsky, who did not meet with this goose in Sakhalin, writes as
follows :—“ Personally I have not seen these geese on Sakhalin. T. $. Polyakov met
them on the Ptichi Gory at the end of May southwards of Nituya, off the eastern coast of
Sakhalin, on steep cliffs separated from the island by sea-water. Dobrotworski records this
species from South Sakhalin. Micul says the nemok, as a bird of passage, occurs from
spring to late autumn in South Sakhalin occasionally and in small numbers.” ?

In regard to North America we do not know very much. This bird has been
observed by Macfarlane in abundance, breeding on the western shore of the Arctic Ocean:
and some nests were found by him on inland fresh-water lakes and at the mouths of the
Anderson, and many other nests were on the shore or on islands in Franklin Bay and
other spots on the coast.

In some cases the nests were merely small depressions in the ground, lined with
down; but in some the quantity of down was very great. The number of eggs in a clutch
was generally 5, but in one nest there were 7, and in several 6.

This species nested in large numbers together with Leucoblepharon hutchinsi on the
marshes; the natives gather the eggs at the end of June and bring them by whole boatfuls
to Mikhalaska. Although Mr. Adams, who gives this information, says these eggs are
_ hot good eating and have a bitter and “fishy” taste, the Russians find them excellent.

The eggs of these geese (in North America) are of a dull ivory or greyish white
colour, and from 70 to 75 mm. (= 2.75-2.900 in.) long, with diameter 48 to 49 mm.
(= 1.80-1.85 in.),

The dimensions of six eggs from the Lena delta (Sogatyr), according to Mr. Gobel,
are as follows :— |

Т Avifauna of Laysan and the Neighbouring Islands, by the Hon, W. Rothschild, р. 271.
2 In spite of this species occurring during the whole summer in South Sakhalin, it can hardly be supposed to nest there. A more
probable assumption, in my opinion, is that only bachelors are met with there, or birds left behind during the flight north.

Black Brent 165

Max. breadth 51 mm.(=2 in.), with 74 mm. length (= 2.91 in.) and 726 сети. weight.

Min. ” 47:5 5 (= 1.87 ” у 2-75: 3 ‚ (= 3.05 5 ) ‚ 654 ) ”
Max. ео 678.5 5 (C= 3.00 5), 4. 505 4,) breadth (=:1.68,, ) =; 660 __,, >
Min. 9) 68 3) (== BOY) »› ) ” 48 99 bb) Cs 1.88 9) ) 9 627 р 9
Max. weight 744 cgrm., with 50 mm. (= 1.96 in.) breadth and 75 mm. (= 2.95 in.) length.
Min. 3) 627 bb) 9) 48 99 (= 1.88 99 ) 99 >) 68 mm. (= 2.67 ” ) 9

Six eggs gave :—

Mean breadth 49.5 mm. (= 1.94 in.); max. breadth 57. mm. (=2 in.); min. breadth 47.5 mm. (= 1.87 in.).
„ leneth 74 о - До. Ш об!
» weight 690 cgrm. ; » weight 744 cgrm.; „ oWelent 627 corm,

As to the mode of life, habits, migration, call, etc., apparently no essential difference
has been noted between this goose and Svranta bernicla. Its chief food is the Zostera,
but small molluscs are sometimes found in the stomach.

In conclusion, I cannot but dwell on the following observation of Professor Menzbier
(Piitsy Rossi, 1. р. 725): “I think that, although the majority of brent-geese passing over
European Russia are typical duser brenta, yet Auser nigricans occurs among them,
especially in Eastern Russia.”

I absolutely do not know what to say to this, as Iam unable to find any indication,
either direct or indirect, of- such ав occiirrence, ОГ can Ш Бе that ше statements™ or
sea-brent being occasionally killed in England with perfectly black bellies served as the
grounds for the above hypothesis of the author of Prtsy Rossi? It is, however, far from —
being yet proved that the black-bellied specimens sometimes met with in England had the
corresponding broad white collars; in other words, that such examples really belonged to
nigricans. И this were the fact, English ornithologists would probably have included this
latter goose in the fauna of their country.

Genus Leucoblepharon. Baird (1858)

Neck long; bill and forehead black, as are feet. On head, only hind part of cheeks and
aural regions white, but sometimes white patches extend to the throat, where they meet.

Easily distinguished from genus Деисоратеа, Reichenbach, by the long neck and the
absence of subterminal black stripes on feathering of body and wings. |

HUTCHINS’S GOOSE
LEUCOBLEPHARON HUTCHINSI, RICHARDSON |
Plate 19

Eneglish—//ufchins’s Goose; Hutchins’s Canada Goose; Lesser Canada Goose; Small Grey
Goose; Little Wild Goose : fTutchins's Barnacle Goose; Flight Goose; Mud Goose ;
Prairie Goose. : Е aki Ls

Russian—Kanadskaya malaya kazarka and И ostochno-stbirskaya kazarka (Buturlin).

Anser canadensis, Pallas (mec Linn.), Zoogr. Ross.-As., ii. p. 230 (ins. Aleut.) (1811).

Anser hutchinsit, Sw. and Richardson, Faun. Bor. Amer., ii. р. 470 (1831); Audubon, Orn. Biogr., iii. р. 226,
pl. 277 (1835); Seebohm, Birds Jap. Етр., р. 239 (1890).

Anser leucopareius, Brandt, Bull. Ac. St. Petersb., i. р. 37 (ins. Aleut.)

Anser (Bernicla) leucopareius, Brandt, Descr. et Тсопез. Anim, Ross.-Novy., Aves, i. р. 13, pl. И. (1836).

Bernicla leucopareta, Gray, Genera of Birds, iii, p. 608 (1844).

Bernicla hutchinst, Gray, Genera of Birds, iii. p. 608 (1844); Cass. U.S. Expl. Exped., Mamm. and Orn., р. 336
(1858); Baird, Birds of N. America, pp. 763, 766 (1858); Seebohm, Ibis, 1882, p. 369 (Jap.); Black.
and Pryer, Trans. As. Soc. Japan, x. p. 96 (1882), |

Bernicla (Leucoblepharon) hutchinsid, Baird, Birds of М. America, р. xlix. (1858).

Lranta hutchinsi, Bonnaterre, Proc. Acad. Philad., 18 70 Р. 1 3,

Leucoblepharon hutchinsit, Gray, Hand-list of Birds, Ш. р. 76 (1871).

Branta canadensis, var. hutchinsii, Coues, Key М. Amer. Birds, p. 284 (1872).

Anser (Branta) canadensis, var. hutchinsid, Ridgway, Ann. Lyc. N. York, x. р. 388 (1874).

Branta canadensis, e. hutchinsit, Coues, Birds of М orth-West, р. 554 (1874).

Branta hutchinsiz, Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus., xxvii, Ь. 114 (1895);

Anser hutchinsi, Вина т, Dikie Gusi Ross. Imp. (“ Psov. i Ruzh. ОКВ.” 1901); 24. separ. р. 6; zd. Sinopt.
tabl. Okhotn, Pt. Ross. Imp., 1901, р. 41.

Bernicla leucopareia, Black. and Pryer, Ibis, 1878, р. 212 (Japonia),

Bernila canadensis hutchinsii, Ridgway, Proc. U.S. Nat. Миз., iii. p. 203 (1880).

Anser (Brenthus) hutchinsi2, Reichenow, Orn. Centr., 1882, p. 37.

Lranta leucopareia, Stejneger, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vi. p. 70 (1883).

Bernicla canadensis, у. hutchinsiz, Baird and Ridgway, Water-Birds of М. America, i. pp. 455, etc.

Lranta canadensis hutchinsii, Stejneger, Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. No. 29, р. 147 (1885); Nelson, Nat. Hist. Coll.
in Alaska, p. 84 (1887); Ridgway, Man. N. Amer. Birds, р. 117 (1887); Stejneger, Proc. U.S. Nat.
Mus., x. р. 135 (Bering Isl.) (1887), _

166

Hutchins’s Goose 167

ADULT’ BIRDS

Head and К black; chin and throat white, and coalesced with latter a white patch
on each side of head, а the cheek and terminating in more ог less acute angle behind
ear-coverts. Frequently stretching along throat, a longitudinal black streak of varying
breadth, then dividing the white cheek-patches so that a separate white patch is formed on
each side of head, as, for example, in a specimen from the Aleutian Islands, described and
figured by Brandt’ under the name of user (Bernicla) leucopareius

Back, upper wing-coverts, secondaries, tertiaries light brown, all feathers except on
back with lighter edgings. Primaries and tail-feathers black-brown, latter normally 16,
more seldom 14 in number, whereby this goose markedly and apparently constantly differs
from Leucoblepharon canadensis, with 18 to 20 tail-feathers. Rump dark brown, upper and
under tail-coverts, which are far from reaching the tips of the tail-feathers, pure white.
Lower part of black neck (and mainly anteriorly) very light, almost white, and, in some
examples, a sharply defined white ring surrounding whole base of neck. Breast and belly
very light brown, gradually passing into white towards vent. Under-part of wings and
axillaries dark brown. Bill black; legs and feet, with webs, dark leaden or almost black.
Iris dark brown.

Plumage of other ages unknown.

This short description, which has been verified in several specimens in the Zoological
Museum of the Imperial Academy of Science at St. Petersburg, and agrees with that of
American authors, I find rather unsatisfactory and even enigmatic, for the following reason.
The Canadian goose, the largest of this group, is divided by some American authorities
into four sub-species (varieties), each of which is apparently again subject to considerable
variations both in dimensions and colouring.

The following are the four sub-species, with their dimensions and distribution :—

1. Leucoblepharon canadensis, regarded as the type of the species, and sometimes
attaining huge dimensions, possesses a very long bill, equal in length to the head,’ and
varies slightly in the intensity of the dark colouring of the plumage; it breeds in the
northern part of United States and in Canada, descending to winter in Mexico.

Length . i ; 1041—1066 mm. (= 41—42 in.).
Wing. as a ' 381—533 mm. (=15.60—21 ш.)..
Culmen . ag ; : ; 39.3 = 68.5 mm.-(= 1.55—2.70 in.)
Tarsus. 62.2 = 93.9 mm. (= 2.75—3.70 in.).

Газ feathers 13 to 20.

| Typical form without longitudinal black streak on neck.
2. Leucoblepharon canadensis hutchinst, of much smaller dimensions than preceding.
Arctic and Subarctic North America, in winter throughout United States, mainly westward
of the Alleghanies ; north-east coast and adjacent islands of Siberia and Japan.
(2) Colouring—as in my description, but sometimes as in typical eee UE
canadensis.

Гепа. м. gS peas 655-863 mm. (= 25—34 in.). 7
Wing =. рава АИ ЕЕ: 373—449 mm. (= 14.75-17.75 in.).
Culmen . See aD, ; 30.5—4.8.2 mm. (= 1.20—1.90 in.).
Tarsus . 57.1-81.2 mm. (= 2.25—3.20 mm.).

Tatl-feathers oe and more hii vie

1 Deser. et Icones Anim. Ross.-Nov., Aves, 1. р. 13, Tab. 2 (1836). : | :
— 2 Whether this difference is enim with sex or age, or characterises a certain race, remains so far entirely unexplained.
3 But, apparently, length of bill is far from constant, ze. is not always in proportion to the other measurements.

168 Geese of Europe and Asia

3. Leucoblepharon canadensis occidentaks, somewhat larger than preceding, but with
feebler bill (?). North-west littoral of North America, to north of Sitka; in winter descends
to California.. Usually on throat a black streak severing white of sides of band.

Length about . Зоо mm. (= about 35 in.).
Мок. | 411—487 mm, (= 16.25—18 in.).
Culmen . : 35.5—-41.9 mm. (= 1.40-1.65 in.)
Tarsus. : : : 77—82.5 mm. (= 3.05—3.25 in.).

LTai-feathers 18 to 20.

4. Leucoblepharon canadensis minimum (minima). The smallest goose of the group.
Pacific littoral of North America, breeding mainly on shores of Norton Bay and on lower
waters of Yukon, but extending to Kotzebue Bay and Cape Barrow on the Arctic shore.
In winter reaches south to California, and less often to upper part of Mississippi valley.
Strays to Sandwich and Laysan Islands.

Length . 584—635 mm. (23—25 in.).
Wing, 345—368 mm. (= 13.60—14.50 in.).
Bill 24—29.2 mm. (= 0.95—1Т.15 in.).
Tarsus. ; 61-70 mm. (= 2.40—2.75 in.)

Lail-feathers 14 to 16,

Along throat a longitudinal streak, separating the white patches of side of head,
mostly present.

According to the statements of American authors, we find that the Pacific seaboard of
North America is inhabited by four sub-species, or varieties, of the Canadian goose—a
circumstance which is so far from agreeing (or, more exactly, is in contradiction) with my
idea of a species that, notwithstanding all the authority of American ornithologists, and my
great faith in Count Salvadori’s knowledge, I am unable to accept it.

On the other hand, the lack of material renders it impossible for me to clear up this
difficult question, the more so that this would require very extensive data from the most
various points in the range of each of these forms. Count Salvadori, in his Catalogue of the
Birds in the British Museum (vol. xxvii.), expresses himself as follows: ‘I have not been
able to recognise more than two species—one (РВ. canadensis) extremely variable in size, and
found nearly all over N. America; and a second, very much smaller and not very variable in
size, confined to Alaska during the breeding season, but, according to American authors,
extending to California in winter.”

So far as I can make out, American ornithologists separate these four forms of the
Canadian goose by the measurements of different parts of the body, and only partially by the
colouring of the plumage, while it seems to me that in the given case the two characters
together hardly suffice for the purpose. On the whole, the question as to the existence of
the different forms of the Canadian goose seems to me as obscure and confused as was
formerly that of the bean goose (A/e/anonyx), and, in a lesser degree, that of the grey geese
(Ч избе’).
| If we recall that European ornithologists were in such doubt about these geese for
more than a century, are we not justified in admitting the possibility of a like situation at
present in regard to the geese of the genus Leucoblepharon in North America?

Were any definite characters, except dimensions and colouring of plumage, for each
separate form of the above-mentioned geese given by American authors, our doubts as to
the truth of their view would be considerably diminished. At the present moment, however,

Hutchins’s Goose 169

I cannot discern in their descriptions any solid basis, except perhaps the number of tail-
feathers—18 to 20 in canadensis and occidentalis, and 14 to 16 in hutchinst and minimum
(mantma),—tor the grouping of these geese. The question of bills remains quite open, and —

~who knows whether the latter may not offer more substantial characters for the separation

of the forms (or species?) of this group than those by which we have been hitherto
guided ?

At present I can do nothing but accept the determinations of these authors for the
goose found by Stejneger on Bering Island, and by other investigators in Japan, and
thus regard the Russian representative of the genus Leucoblepharon as the form called
hutchinst.

At my request Mr. Frohawk has figured an example of this form, and I feel sure
that anyone, after a careful examination of this sketch, will at once see how far this type of
the genus Leucoblepharon differs from the other black-footed geese of Europe and Asia, by
its peculiar arrangement of colours.

To the information that this goose nests in the Komandor Group (Bering Island),
and in the Kuriles, and that in winter it occurs in Japan (which was made known by
Temminck as early as 1840, and confirmed by Blackiston and Pryer), I can add nothing.
There are, in fact, no accounts of this goose in Russia.

As to North America, there is no small amount of information with regard to this
goose, although it is difficult to make out to which form it refers. I may, however, observe
that in their mode of life, their tendency to visit cultivated fields, and other habits, the
geese of this group seem to differ markedly from the other black-footed geese, and perhaps
only the red-breasted goose (from among the latter) shares with them the instinct of flying
inland to feed.

Of three eggs of this species from the river Anderson, gathered on July 4, in
the Zoological Museum of the St. Petersburg Academy, Mr. Gobel gives the following
measurements :—

(а) breadth 57 mm. (= 2.24 in.); length 85 mm. (= 3.34 in.); weight 1464 cgrm.
(6) ” 56 9 C= 2,20 ” Ne ‚ 86 > Е yy os ys 1320 >,
(с) ” 56 ” (= 2.20 9 E ” 85.5 ” (= 3.36 ” a +B 13380 ”

or mean breadth, 56.3 mm. (= 2.21 in.); mean length 85.2 mm. (= 3.35 in.); mean weight 1388 cgrm.

I may here also cite the measurements and weights of two eggs also from the
Anderson, distinguished as cavadensis, which have been verified by Mr. Gobel :—

(а) breadth 56.5 mm, (= 2.22 in.); length 85 mm. (= 3.34 in.); weight 1368 cgrm.
a oy OO ee oe a р

or mean breadth, 55.5 mm. (= 2.18 in.); mean length 85.5 mm. ( = 3.36 in.); mean weight 1338 cgrm.

“These two geese form,” observes Mr. Gobel, “in regard to the structure of the.
shell, a group somewhat remote from the black-footed goose. Their structure, although
rather resembling the latter, is coarser, as they exhibit a certain colouring in consequence of
soiling, not proper to the egg itself. In form they are prolonged; in Leucoblepharon
hutchinst the mean length is 28.9 mm. (=1.13 in.) more than the mean breadth; in
canadensis 30 mm. (=1.18 in.). These eggs, therefore, are shaped like those of Welanonyx
brachyrhynchus.”

Z

[70 Geese of Europe and Asia

I may add the remark that, in view of the extremely similar dimensions and weights
of the eggs of two supposed different geese, eggs gathered in the same river, where it is
quite clear that only the western form (Awfchiusz), and not the east American (canadensis),
can be located, I am compelled to regard all those five eggs as belonging to one and the
same species, and not to two different races of geese.

ВА.

Genus Leucopareia, Reichenbach (1852)

DISTINGUISHED from Бра by tail-coverts not reaching the tips of the tail-feathers, the
latter being 14, and not 16, and by white areas on head.

From Аийбует а this genus differs by the unfeathered chin, the absence of rufous
colouring from the plumage, and by the greater number of teeth (not less than 30) on each
side of upper mandible. From both genera Lewcopareia is distinguished by the light
bluish cinereous grey colouring of upper surface of body, with sub-terminal black crescents to
feathers. From Leucoblepharon it differs by the shorter neck, white forehead, and the
character of the plumage.

THE BARNACLE GOOSE
LEUCOPAREIA LEUCOPSIS, BECHSTEIN

Plate 20

English—Sarnacle Goose, Barnacle or Bernacle; Wexford Bernacle ; Hlell-hounds.

Russian—BLeloshchekaya kazarka; Sveduyaya kazavka (Lepekhin); xemaya kazarka,
malaya nemaya kazarka and nemo gus (Sabaneev) ; varegue (in Turnkhansk, fes¢e
Middendorff ).

Samoyed—Ladu* (in Kolguev, 2е5е Trevor-Battye); Dyoryduku and dyor (in Taimyr, feste
Middendorff).

Yakut—Lyglyyd (on Boganida, ее Middendorff).

Finnish—Valkeanoskt hanhtz. |

German—/Vounengans ; Muschelgans ; Schottische Nordgans ; Бегиасйе; Baumgans.

French—ZLa Vounette; Bernache nounette.

Bernicla, Brisson, Orn., vi. р. 300 (1760).

Bernicla minor, Brisson, Orn., vi. р. 302 (1760) (juv.).

Anas bernicla ( partem), Linn., Syst. Nat. 1. р. 198 (1766).

Anas erythropus, Gmelin (пес Linn.), Syst. Nat., 1. р. 512 (1788).

Anser erythropus, Bonnaterre (mec Linn.), Encyclop. Méthod, 1. р. £20 (1790).

Anas leucopsis, Bechstein, Orn. Taschenb,, и. р. 424 (1803).

Anser leucopsts, Bechstein, Gem. Nat. Deutschl., 2 ed., iv. p. 921 (1809) ; Audubon, Orn. Biogr., Ш. р. 609, pl. 296
(1835); Naumann, Vog. Deutschl., xi. р. 378, pl. 291 (1842); Kessler, Russk. Orn., р. 368 (1847);
Menzbier, Ptitsy Rossii, 1. р. 727 (1895); z@, Promysl. i Okhotn. Pt. Ross. i КауК., р. 462, pl. 131;
Middendorff, Reis. Sib., ii. 2, p. 228 (1851); Kholodkovsk. and Silantiev, Pt. Yevropy, р. 524 (1901);
Czernay, Beitr. Faun. Chark. Gouvern. (“ Bull. Soc. Mosc., 1850, р. 620); Deryugin, Orn. izsl. Pskovsk.
gub., 1897; Buturlin, Tabl. opred. Plastinchatokl. (“ Psov. i Ruzh. Okh.,” 1901); 2, separ. р. 7;

1 In Rujfibrenta the number of teeth, so far as I can yet judge, must seldom exceed 16.
2 The name, perhaps, is given on Kolguev also to the red-breasted £azarka, for which see Buturlin’s notice at end of book,

РТ

а Geese of Europe and Asia

id., Sinopt. tabl. Okhotn. Ptits. Ross. Imp. р. 41 (1901); Sabaneev, Ukazatel Kne. i St. Okhotn. i Zool,
Sod., pp. 455-458 (1883); zd., “ Zhurnal Okhoty,” 1. 1874, “ Prolet gusei,” with drawings,

Anser bernicla, Pallas. Zoogr. Ross.-Asiat., ii. р. 230 (1811).

Bernicla leucopsis, Boie, Isis, 1822, $. 563 ; Biichner, Ptitsy Spb. gub., р. 514 (1884); Trevor-Battye, Ice-bound on —
Kolguev, р. 425 (1895); Malmgren, “ Ibis,” 1869, р. 230; Sclater, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1869, р.
629; Pleske, Sauget, and Vog. Kola Hlbns. (Beitr. Kenntn. Russ. R., 1х. р. 245) (1886); Russov, Ornis
Esth., Lifl. et Curl. 1880, р. 169; Brandt, Cab. J. f. О., 1880, р. 247 ; Macpherson, History of Fowling,

Вор,
Bernicla erythropus, Stephens, Gen. Zool., xii. 2, р. 49 (1824).
Leucopareta leucopsis, Reichenbach, Avium Syst. Nat., p. ix. (1852).
Chenalopex leucopsis, Geibel, Thesaur. Orn., i. р. 372 (in Syn. A. leucopsts) (1872).
Branta leucopsis, Bannister, Proc. Acad. Philad., 1871, р. 131; Salvadori, Cat. Birds British Mus., xxvii. р. 117

(1895).
Anser (Brenthus) leucopsis, Reichenow, Orn. Centr., 1882, p. 37.

Anser canadensis, Lepekhin, Putesh., iii, Prib., р. 5, pl. го (srednyaya kazarka),

ADULT Втво$ OF Вотн SEXES

Forehead, cheeks, chin, and throat white, often with yellowish or rosy yellowish tint ;
streak on lobes, between bill and eyes, crown, nape and all neck black; upper part of back
between scapula and rump black, latter with bluish reflection; upper tail-coverts white ;
breast and belly greyish white; vent and lower tail-coverts pure white; flanks and thighs
white, with transverse grey bars; scapulars, upper wing-coverts, and tertiaries, light
bluish grey, with sub-terminal blue-black crescents and very narrow white tips to feathers ;
primaries and secondaries, as well as tail-feathers (14), very dark, almost black. Under
part of wing and axillaries light grey. Bill, legs, feet, and claws black. Iris dark brown.
Female slightly smaller than gander, but identical in plumage.

YouNG BIRDS

On white areas of head an admixture of black or dark brown featherlets ; feather-tips,
scapulars, and upper wing-coverts, with rusty ог rufous tintage. Flanks with broader and
darker grey bars. ‘This description, borrowed mostly from Count Salvadori, probably refers
to birds of not less than three years, although for want of material I cannot positively affirm
this. In younger birds sub-terminal black crescénts in feathers of adults replaced by much
wider black bars, giving whole surface of body darker colouring. It is very likely that in
this respect the barnacle goose is subject to considerable individual variation.

YounG Birps IN First PLUMAGE

White on head, with strong mixture of brown; colouring of head, neck, and breast

tinged with brown below white tips; tail-feathers with Е white tips. The black bill
and feet have a reddish tinge.

YOUNG IN Down

Upper part of body dark grey, lower part whitish grey.

DIMENSIONS OF ADULT В1вос!

Total length . : ' 596-711 mm. ( = 23.50—28 in.).
Wing . ' ; 3 379=4:20:.* „ = 14 0O0= 16.00. в.)
Culmen . ; 2030-35 Е ТА)

Tarsus . 032—762 „дом,

1 These measurements hardly represent the limits, and on account of scantiness of material, are borrowed from various authors.

Barnacle Goose т

Number of teeth on each side of upper mandible not less than 30.

Weight, according to Mr. Н. L. Popham, based on 55 individuals; maximum в lbs.,
minimum 2%, and average 4 5.1

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

With regard to Russia scarcely anything is known in reference to the range of this
species. Why Professor М. А. Menzbier denies the possibility of its breeding in the
Taimyr peninsula, and hence its traverse of the Transural lakes, seems unintelligible. The
fact that Middendorff did not personally meet with this goose in Siberia is, in any case,
less indicative of its absence than are the Russian and native names of its presence in that
country.

On the contrary, it seems to me that its Russian name in Turukhansk, vavegui
—the Yakut, Zyglyy¢d—and Samoyed, dyoryduku or dyor in the Taimyr district, are
undoubtedly in favour of its occurrence, and doubtless also of its nesting there; and once
this is admitted, there are no grounds for questioning its occurrence on the Transural lakes,
as stated by Mr. Sabaneev on the authority of natives of the Perm Government.

Accordingly, I am quite prepared to believe that the barnacle goose breeds in the
Siberian tundra eastwards to the Taimyr peninsula. Another circumstance in favour of
this opinion is that once in England a red-breasted bird was shot among a flock of
barnacle geese.”

If we examine this question somewhat more closely we shall inevitably come
to the conclusion that these two geese must somewhere nest in company, but from our
knowledge of the breeding range of the red-breasted goose, we are driven to conclude that
this can occur only in the western part of North Siberia. Otherwise, it would be
impossible to explain the above-mentioned occurrence of red-breasted in a flock of barnacle
geese. Of course this is no more than the logical result of the analysis of the facts, but it
has, I think, a great share of probability. On the other hand, the circumstance that
explorers of Northern Siberia have not met with this goose is, in my opinion, of no import-
ance whatever. There is much that they have not yet ascertained about that country, and,
indeed, we have no right to demand more than they have at present accomplished in the
way of determining the local fauna, knowing how difficult it is to discover, note, and
collect everything in a comparatively short time in regions so difficult, so vast, and so
inaccessible. I repeat that I fully trust the statements of Pallas and the statements of
Yakuts and Samoyeds as cited by Middendorff, that the barnacle goose is a member of
the northern fauna, at least, of the more western part of Siberia. This question may
therefore be regarded as still open, and in nowise as finally decided in the negative.

As regards the authenticity of the identified breeding-grounds of this goose in
Russia, we may point to Novaia Zemlia and Kolguev, this species probably nesting in the
latter area in comparatively very small numbers.

The migration routes, given by Professor Menzbier, include the region of the
Varanger fjord, the littoral of the Baltic border, Lake Chud, the coast of the St. Petersburg
Government, the southern seaboard of Finland, and the Aaland Islands, with rare visits to
Poland and Pskov. То these I can add the Mezen, where on May 18, 1840, an adult
male, now preserved in the Zoological Museum of the St. Petersburg Academy, was

1 The Field, January 17, 1903, р. 2612. : 2 See notice of red-breasted goose.

174 Geese of Europe and Asia

obtained. Its label bears on one side “ Filoppov,” and on the other “von Baer.” It
is indeed probable that, apart from Poland and the Pskov Government, this goose has
visited, and still visits (? on migration) many parts of European Russia, but that these
visits have been and still remain unnoticed.

Although we have no other information with regard to the range of this goose in
Russia, reference may be made to a somewhat strange statement by Lepekhin as to its
occurrence in Archangel. Describing it as ‘‘srednyaya kazarka,’* or user canadensis,
this writer proceeds to observe that “this goose, according to the statement of the famous
Linné, breeds in Canada, whence it was given the name of the Canadian goose; but
it is yearly to be seen in Archangel, and, in particular, on the lakes of Lapland, and on
the tundras in Samoyediya, where it rears its young and affords no small part of the
subsistence of the Samoyeds, who slaughter a great many of these birds with sticks on the
Shallow lakes in the moulting season, and after drying them in the sun, store them for
future use.”

Notwithstanding that Lepekhin confounded it with the Canadian goose, and perhaps
partly also with the brent (Bvanta bernicla), he evidently knew the present species, since
the figure he gives (Zc. Pl. то) leaves no doubt on the subject. His statements are, in
any case, worthy of attention, and the assertion as to its breeding on the tundras of
‘“Samoyediya” should not be too hastily contradicted. Who, indeed, can affirm that
Lepekhin was mistaken, and that we are really much better acquainted with the fauna of
Lapland than was generally the case in his time?

But few authenticated breeding-grounds of this species are known outside Russia.
It has, however, been found nesting in limited numbers in the Lofoden Islands (Professor
Collett); and it also breeds in the southern part of Greenland, where it is a regular bird of
passage, аз a specimen of the young in down was brought thence to the Copenhagen
Museum. In Iceland and Spitzbergen it undoubtedly nests, as it probably also does in
Franz-Josef Land; but, after passing through the southern part of Greenland, it is at
present entirely unknown to what part of the north it goes to breed. |

The barnacle goose winters in some parts of the Baltic, on the coasts of Denmark,
Holland, Northern France, and Great Britain; but it seldom visits the interior of the West
of Europe, or even Southern Europe, although instances are known of its straying into
Spain. On the Atlantic coast of North America this goose only occasionally occurs.

If our information with regard to the geographical distribution of this species be
fragmentary and incomplete, we are still less acquainted with its life-history. Professor
Menzbier, for instance, writes that, ‘‘ We know hardly anything of the manner of life of the
barnacle goose. Like many other geese it is a sociable bird, and an excellent flyer and
runner; its food, which, like that of the brent, consists of water-weeds, crustaceans, and
aquatic insects, is obtained either on the sea-shores or the margins of lakes. About
July 16 on Spitzbergen these birds are in full moult, when, like the brent, they are quite
incapable of flight and seek refuge by running.” Professor Collett, who has done so much
for the zoology of Norway, states that “а pair of barnacle geese bred for several years in
the Lofoden Islands, where they constructed a nest of waterweeds and moss, which was
placed either оп a narrow shelf of cliff or under the shelter of a rocky projection. ‘The eggs
in a clutch are five; in external appearance they are indistinguishable from those of the
tents.

1 Puteshestvie, iii, Append, p. 5, pl. 10.

ИЕ

Barnacle Goose _ Ра:
The following are the only dimensions I know of the eggs of this species :—
Width . ; О-о Ш)
Length . , : ; O42 Minn — 35 70 in, ),

and these are extraordinarily large for so small a goose.

In captivity these geese become very tame, and will not only breed, but in exceptional
cases will pair with other species. Count Salvadori, for instance, states that he saw in one
of the London parks a cross between a barnacle and some other species of goose, which had
a great development of the white on its head and yellowish feet.

Probably the majority of my readers are acquainted with the legend of the origin of
this goose from the barnacle (Lefas anatifera), so common on the western shores of Europe.
This myth, of very ancient origin, was taken for fact even in the sixteenth century by such
well-known writers as Aldrovandi, Gessner, Olaus Magnus, etc., and strange to say, there
are places where the coast population, especially fishermen, still does not doubt its truth.
The essence of this story, which has many variations, is as follows :—

In one of the Orkneys, namely, Pomona, on the very shore stands a wondrous tree,
at the ends of whose branches grow shells, which at a certain time of year, on falling into
the sea, change into barnacle geese. The name of these geese—Bernacle or Bernicle—is
identical with that of the shells; but the latter are not molluscs at all, but belong to
crustaceans of the order Cirripedia, family Lesadide, and species Лера; anatifera of Linné.
The crustaceans fasten their calcareous dwellings to various submerged objects, and in
particular to piles and planks lying long in the water. This myth refers generally not only
to the goose in question, but locally also to the brent and even the scoter. Sir К. Payne-
Gallwey writes:1 ““Absurd to narrate, the old story of brent geese being hatched from
barnacles on drift timber is universally current on the coast of Ireland to this day. Nothing
will dissuade the fishermen and fowlers ; they will vow they have seen the occurrence them-
selves, or that their friends have.”

The same author holds that the flesh of this goose is not edible, while according to
others it is delicious. Of course everything depends on the food the birds last fed on;
and their stomachs have been found to contain various vegetable substances, such as Poa
distans, Carex bulbosus, Trifolium repens, Ranunculus, etc. It is, however, also known that
various kinds of shellfish occasionally serve as their chief food, and then, of course, their
flesh is fishy.

On the waters round the coasts of Holland, the north of France, and the north-
west of Great Britain, the barnacle goose usually arrives about the middle of October ;
sometimes, if the weather be severe, a little earlier; it leaves in March. On the waters of
Schleswig-Holstein this species is very abundant in winter, keeping mostly near the oyster-
beds. On the eastern coasts of England it is a rare visitor, appearing sometimes after an
absence of scores of years. In Ireland it is much more numerous than the brent.

Although a completely marine bird, the barnacle goose often flies to pasture, if the
latter be near the sea, which the brent apparently never does. With the latter it is not
friendly, and even seems to avoid its company; in localities where the two live together, the
barnacle keeps as far aloof as possible, never mingling with the flocks of brent.

1 The Fowler in Ireland, р. 159 (1882),

Genus Cyguopsis, Brandt (1836)

Вил. longer than head, entirely black, depressed, short at the point, and somewhat
swollen at the forehead; base of upper mandible projecting into feathering of forehead in
an arch. Nails of both mandibles very large, with their outer edges (owing to the number
‘of parallel transverse furrows) serrated like the milling on a coin to a much greater extent
than in other geese. Tarsus considerably shorter than median digit without claw (usually
by more than half-inch). Tail-feathers 18. Legs and feet orange.

THE SWAN-GOOSE

CYGNOPSIS CYGNOIDES, LINN.
Plate 21

English—CZinese Goose ; Swan Goose. |

Russian—Swkhonds (Transbaikalia); kaury gus (ditto, with Daurian frontier); ws-lobed
(Przewalski); Рау gus (mainly domesticated).

Mongol—Khongor galun (teste Pallas, meaning swan-goose; but feste Radde, who writes
Khongor -golun, it means yellow-brown goose. The domesticated birds are
called by the Mongols mangut-galn, ге. Devil’s goose, or ghost goose, /este

Pallas).

Gilyak— У? and Wyouz (Schrenck).

Mangun and Gold—/Vyunya (Schrenck).

Orochon—WVyunyaki (Schrenck). 3

German—Schwanengans , Tvompetergans ; Hockergans; Russische Gans. Sibivische Gans :
Chinestsche Gans; Japanische Gans : Guinea Gans (evidently the majority of these
names refer to domesticated birds).

French—Ove de Guinée.

Anas cygnotdes, Linn. Fauna Suec. р. 108 (1746); 24., Syst. Nat. 1. р. 194 (1766).

Anser muscoviticus, Brisson, Orn., iv. p. 278 (1760),

Anser guineensis, Brisson, 4.с., р. 280.

Anser cygnoides, Pallas, “ Voyages,” iv. р. 144, Арр. р. 672; zd, Zoogr. Ross.-Asiat., ii. p2-2T8, ре Go);
Eyton, Mon. Anat., pl. 5 (skeleton), 1838; Temminck and Schlegel, Faun. Jap., Aves, р. 125 (1850);
Maak, Amur, App. р. 143 (1859); Radde, Beitr. Kennt. Russ. В., xxxiii. p. 210 (1 861); Przewalski, Put.
Uss: Kr., I 870, pp. 182, 1535 cic 24., Mong. Fst Tang., 11. p.151 (1 87-0); Sclater, Proc. Zool. Soc. London,

1 In all the other Palzearctic geese we see the opposite condition ; the feathering of the forehead projects in an arch or even an
angle into the base of the upper mandible,

176

Swan-Goose т

1880, р. 501; Seebohm, Birds of Japan. Empire, р. 285 (1890); Buturlin, Dikie Сия В. I. (1901),
р. 21; Sabaneev, Ukaz. Kn. 1 St. Okhotrich. i Zool. Sod. pp. 455-458 (1883); Severtsov, Vert. i
Goriz. Raspr. Turk. Zh., р. 70 (1873); Bogdanov, М. N., Pt. Zver. Povolzh. (1871), р. 148; Buturlin,
Sinop, tabl. ОКБ. Pt. В. I. (1901), р. 40; Macpherson, History of Fowling, р. 226, 1897.

Anas ortentalis, Gmelin, Syst. Nat. 1. р. 503 (1788).

Cygnus sinensts, Е, Gen. Leet Saline Senn? Seema Oo):

Cygnopsts cygnotdes, Brandt, Bull. Ac. Sc. Pét., 1836, р. Зи. 74. Weer et Icones-Ain, Kos, Мох Aves) peas
(1836); Taczanowski, Faune Orn. Sib. Or., р. 1100 о 24. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1888,
р. 46; Stejneger, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., x. р. 136 (Bering Island); Salvadori, Cat: Birds Brit. Mus,
XXVil. р. 107 (1895); Oates, Man. Game Birds of India, р. 11 (1899).

Anser cygnoides ferus, Temminck and Schlegel, Fauna Jap., Aves, pl. 81 (1850).

Cygnopsts ferus, Reichenbach, Syst. Av., iv., Novit. Natat., pl. cccliii. fig. 2773 (1850).

Cygnopsis guineensts, Reichenbach, Av. Syst. Nat., р. x. (1852).

Cygnopsis cygnoides а. australis, Bonaparte, Compt.-Rendus, хИи., р. 648 (1856).

Anser (Cygnopses) cygnotdis, Schrenck, Убе. Amur-L., р. 457, pl. xv. (1860); Radde, Reis. O.-Sib., ii. р. 350
(1863).

Anser sinensts, Sclater, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1863, р. 234.

Anser grandis, Finsch (mec Gmel.), Ibis, 1877, р. 53.

Cycnopsis cycnoides, Heine and Reichenow, Mus. Hein. Огп. р. 342 (1890).

ADULT MALE

On feathering of head, along base of upper mandible, runs a narrow white streak,
mostly with strong admixture of bright rusty, and a similar white (with rusty) patch occupies
apical part of feathering of chin, which falls short by more than an inch of base of nail of
lower mandible. From base of upper mandible over lores and across eye, passing below
it and over ear-coverts, extends a wash of reddish clayey brown, occupying whole crown and
nape, and gradually mingling with whitish of cheeks; a streak of same colour passes behind
base of lower mandible; chin rather lighter. Маре and posterior surface of neck reddish
brown (rufous); throat, cheeks, and front surface and sides of neck whitish ; breast grey
buffish white, the feathers often with lighter edgings and a rusty tinge. Back grey-brown .
with greyish white edges to feathers, giving its whole surface a scaly or wavy appearance ;
lower part of body dingy white. Flanks like back, that is grey-brown, with light grey
(or whitish) undulations, due to the light margins of the feathers. Vent and lower tail-
coverts white; rump greyish; upper and lateral tail-coverts white; tail grey-brown with
broad white edges and tips. Wing generally ashen grey; upper coverts, lying nearest edge
of wing, almost pure ashen grey, with very feeble admixture of brownish, but latter colour
more definite nearer back. The lesser and median coverts have lighter whitish edgings ;
greater wing-coverts with white edgings ; alula pure ashen grey.

Outer primary flight-feathers, at middle of their length, with ashen-grey outer webs ;
the inner darker grey; web towards tip of feather becoming brown-black ; successive primaries
gradually losing the grey and becoming brown-black; brown secondaries and tertiaries with
whitish edgings, and posterior tertiaries gradually becoming lighter and of the same colour

as the feathers of the back and scapule. Shafts of all flight-feathers, as in other eee
white, with the exception of the tips, which are of the same colour as the webs.

Under part of wing and axillaries dark ashen grey. Bill black, glossy, particularly nail
of upper mandible. Beneath the slightly swollen base of upper mandible, projecting arch-
wise into the plumage of the forehead, lies a transverse straight furrow (or depression), very
like that in swans. Occasionally in dry skins this is slightly swollen and wrinkled trans-
versely. Number of teeth on each side of upper mandible varying from 28 to 30 ; but with larger
materials the limits may prove wider. Particularly striking 1s the fact that between the

mental angle and the posterior edge of the nail of the lower mandible, for a length of about
PAN

178 Geese of Europe and Asia
38 mm. (=1.50 in.), the intermandibular space is occupied by very hard smooth skin,
having the appearance of a black horny plate. It would be very desirable to know what
this skin is like in the living bird, and whether it is really horn. Generally the structure
of the bill in the swan-goose is nearer that of swans than is that of other geese. Legs and
feet orange, brighter or lighter in tint. Iris red-brown.

Total length 875-915 mm. (= 34.4—36 in.).

Wing ; : 445-460 mm, (= 17.50—18.10 in.).
Tail ; Е: 140—152 mm. (= 5.50—5.90 in.)

Culmen ; 87—08 mm. (= 3.42—3.80 in.).
Bill from gape . 75-82 Min. (| = 2.05—3,00 41,
Tarsus 89—82 mm. (= 3.14—3.22 in.).
Median digit with claw 80-90 mm. (= 3.14—3.54 in.).
Breadth of bill at base 27-20 Mah (sl bl on iia:

ADULT FEMALE

Generally resembling male, but inferior in size. Swelling on base of upper
mandible absent, and white feathering along base of bill considerably narrower, and
at places even interrupted. White patch on apex of chin almost non-existent. I have,
however, seen too few females to be sure that all these characters are constant. For this
reason, and because I may possibly have mistaken young males for females, I prefer to
give the dimensions of females according to Messrs. Radde and Schrenck.

Length 215

Wing . : cee rol!
"Рае, | 4” то”
Culmen : ЕЕ , ее”
Depth of bill at base ро”
Tarsus 2! ol!
Median digit ; . И
Claw 6"
(Radde.)
Wing . 16" 6”
Tail 5 ll
ВИ git ai!
Depth of bill at base . i! 2!”
Breadth of bill at base . a
Tarsus . pie
Median digit 27 tou"
Claw au
(Schrenck.)

YouNG Birp (IN First PLuMAGE)!

Bill smaller; white of cheeks and throat without admixture of brownish. A white
(or rusty white) streak on feathering at base of bill absent.

yellow with blackish webs.

Wing .

Tail

Culmen ;

Depth of bill at base
Breadth of bill at Базе.
Tarsus :
Median digit without claw
Claw of median digit

The young in down appear to be unknown.

1 Schrenck, Где. Amur.-L., pl. xv. fig. 2.

Feet in living bird dingy

(Schrenck.)

a.

Swan-Goose 179

(GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

So far as known, comparatively simple; the limits on the west being the rivers Obi
and Tobol, and on the east Kamchatka, and the Komandor and Kuril Islands. |

The whole of Siberia within these limits, with the exception, of course, of a few spots
unsuitable for nesting, must be regarded as the home of this goose—in other words, its
breeding-grounds; but the northern boundary of its range in Siberia is not yet ascertained,
there being no trustworthy data for the purpose. It may, however, be surmised with great
probability that it passes far below the Arctic Circle, and nowhere reaches the same. From
the shore of the Okhotsk Sea the species has not been recorded (as already observed by
Schrenck), and the same holds good for Sakhalin, but this does not prove that it does not
exist there, although it can hardly breed on Sakhalin on account of the apparent absence of
suitable spots. The chief centre of distribution of the swan-goose must be considered the
whole region surrounding Lake Baikal, Transbaikalia, and all Northern Mongolia, as well
as the whole course of the Amur, the Argun, and the Ussuri district. The bird migrates
to winter in the Celestial Empire, where at that season, according to the Abbé David, native
fowlers furnish the markets of Shanghai and Tian-Tsin with these geese. It also winters in
Korea and Japan, where it is a resident. According to the same authority, the swan-goose
leaves China for the north very early.

In regard to its distribution in Central Asia, we have known from the time of Pallas
that it is found in the Altai Mountains, that is, on the Charysh, Koksun, and Teletsk Lakes ;
but how far south its limit reaches is not yet ascertained. Przewalski met with broods of
these geese and moulting old birds in the valley of the Yellow River on Tsaidamin-Nor ;
but in Tsaidam, on Koko-Nor, he says that the species does not occur. On the other hand,
during the journey from Ala-shan to Urga, through the Gobi, his expedition frequently met
with flocks migrating in August.

In Turkestan the swan-goose occurs only as a casual visitor. Severtsov mentions
that it was obtained by Karelin from Semirechiya, and he himself saw geese which he took for
this species in May 1864, in the steppe between Verny and Kastek at a height of about 3000
feet, near the backwaters of some mountain streams. As to the suggestion made by Mr.
Bogdanov (Ptetsy # zvert Povolzhya), “that there is nothing impossible in swan-geese occur-
ring on passage on the Volga,” this seems incredible, as in such case this goose should winter
at least somewhere in Europe, of which we have no evidence. Its casual occurrence on the
Volga and farther west is of course possible, and I even fully believe, as appears from the
notice of Philacte canadica, that the latter has been twice obtained on that river, but between
such casual visits and regular migration the difference is very great. As I cannot give a
more accurate definition of the range in Asia, I will now quote such observations as furnish
the most valuable information with regard to the habits of this goose. Dr. Radde, for
example, writes as follows:” “Оп Lake Baikal swan-geese keep only to the mouths of the
larger streams falling into the lake, and I never met them on the steep shores of Lake Baikal
itself. Moreover, these geese are not plentiful there in winter, but in August 1855, of an
evening, their loud, resonant notes might be clearly heard in the delta of the Angara, over-
powering those of the other water-fowl. In summer these geese are by no means uncommon,

1 Г quite admit this goose may appear in winter in Turkestan, but I cannot but treat Severtsov’s determinations with some scepticism,
as he identified Amser obscurus from that region.
2 S1b. Rets., ii. р. 350, etc.

180 Geese of Europe and Asia

and are sometimes caught during the moult or as quite young goslings, and tamed.
I often met with them in this domesticated state, especially in the lower part of the valley of
the Selenga. On Tarei-Nor, in 1856, the first swan-geese showed themselves on April 3.
On the 18th, on Lake Ildza there were already many eggs, although by no means all the
geese bred there. Many of them kept in flocks during the whole summer. On the Middle
Amur the vanguard appeared earlier than in Mongolia, namely on March 28, 1858. On
April 4, in the Bureisk Hills on the Uril, geese were met with already paired. On the
Tunkinsk plateau in the spring of 1858 they appeared much later; although in that year all
the birds at that great elevation were late in their arrival, and the swan-geese, which are
generally not numerous, did not put in an appearance till the end of April. In previous
years, according to the natives, they were more common in this locality. On May 27, 1856,
the natives brought me swan-geese which showed the first signs of moulting ; and by the
first week of August the moulting was completed on Tarei-Nor. By August 12 the geese
had already concentrated in large camps, and their noise and cries were then unceasing.
They rested by preference on salt pools, over which they hovered from time to time. On
September 2 the majority of the swan-geese left Tarei-Nor, on the 4th there were but few
remaining, and by the 7th all were gone. In the Burei Hills I noted that the first left on
August 28, and the last on September 2. On the frontier of Mongolia the first eggs were
found on April 15; these being always of less size than those of the grey-lags which nest
there. Ihe figure given by Thienemann agrees with the smallest example among those
brought home by myself. Usually the eggs are pure white, but some are stained all over
with grey dirt which cannot be washed off. The structure of the shell is subject to the same
variations as in the eggs of the grey-lag. ‘They are often coarse-grained, but sometimes the
grains are less prominent and less close together, while at other times their surface is
comparatively smooth.”

This description of the eggs of the swan-goose does not agree with one by Mr.
Gobel,’ based on 20 examples, in which ‘the structure of the shell of the egg of the
swan-goose’ is said to be ‘smooth and shows a crystalline character, in which it
approaches that of the shell of the eggs of Bewick’s swan.”

According to the same observer, these dimensions are as follows :—

Max. breadth 59 mm, (= 2.32 in.), with 85.5 mm. length (= 3.28 in.), and 1512 cgrm. weight (Sidemi).

is : 59 а С и ыы ЕО a dees A 5
tie’ = Ty 53 of RGSS OS Е mag) О | Е Е 55 Ho ? , (Kulussutai).
Аа Неман: Зо ks ЕК о 0 Е 02 2 Serene ae a. =
Min. я 7б О м Е ЕО, > и. . Ie AO „ (Kulussutai).
Max. weight 1590 cgrm,, me. SOK Ss я (=2:20) pas loeminn nae Ем:
Min. к 1176 » оо mes ” (= 2.10 > й О dy (= 2.99 5 7.

Mean breadth 56.6 mm. (= 2.22 in.); max. breadth 59 mm. (= 2.32 in.); min. breadth 53 mm. (= 2:08 Ш...
» length 81.6 , (=3.21,); , length 82.5 , (=3.24,,); „ length 76 , (=2.99 ,).
Ее i422 651. › weight 15900 сегт. ; » weight 1176 сегт.

Przewalski writes concerning this goose as follows :—?
“On the lakes and swamps of the valley of the Lefu, of all the geese the one

1 Mistakes in the determination of eggs are very frequent, especially if the eggs are supplied by natives, so that it is more than
probable that Dr. Radde’s description refers partly to eggs of other species.

2 wii
In one account we find the diameter less, namely = 51 mm, (=2 in.), but it is very probable that the variations in this respect will
prove greater with larger material.
3 Putesh. v Ussur. Kraye, 1870, р. 220.

Swan-Goose т8 1

most frequently met with is the swan-goose, whose broods I came upon from the beginning
of June. There are usually from 4 to 6 goslings. The two parents always keep with
them, and sometimes two or three broods will unite, when the number of pairs of old
birds is equal to that of the combined broods.

“If surprised on an open spot, for example a river or lake, the old birds as a
rule fly off, while the young ones try to save themselves by diving. If, however, the
brood succeeds in time in getting into cover, they effect their retreat on foot, while if
pursued by a dog, the old birds, which take to wing only in extremity, like ducks sham
being wounded and unable to fly, so as to draw the attention of the enemy to themselves.
The young birds meanwhile hide in convenient nooks, where they lie so close that
usually they do not allow themselves to be taken either by the dog or the sportsman,
even when the latter has noticed their place of concealment.”

Again, in his Mongoliya 7 strana Tangutov, и. р. 151, we find the same traveller
observing: “Ме with these geese in small numbers in the beginning of April on Dalai-
Nor’; while still later he writes that “оп Lake Khanka Auser cygnoides appears in
great numbers on spring migration, which is always rapid in the first third of April.
Ordinarily these geese keep in flocks of from 20 to 40 individuals. On the wing they
often form a wedge, within which ducks of various kinds frequently find room.”

In the beginning of June Colonel Przewalski found the young birds not larger than
mallards. Of the curiosity of the swan-goose this traveller writes as follows: “Оп the
whole, this species is not very cautious, but extremely curious. Having noticed a dog or
fowler crouching in the grass, a passing pair (but not a flock) will almost always fly to the
spot and get under fire.”

Messrs. Dybowski and Godlewski found these geese nesting in great numbers
in Dauria along the Argun, where they made their nests on the steppe among grass,
first making a slight hollow in the ground, and then lining them with down. ‘The female
sits very tight on her eggs, and leaves them unwillingly. As soon as the goslings go out on
a river, they join those of other broods; the gander is always with his family, while the
young ones are growing up, till they are fledged. In moulting, the adult males lose
all their flight-feathers at опсе.` A flock in case of danger rushes to the river, where all
its members swim at first, but having gained a certain distance, immerse themselves in the
water, leaving only their heads above, and then strive to return to the shore, diving below
the surface in the more dangerous places.

According to Godlewski, the migration season is the same as for other geese. At
this time all the geese keep to open sandy shores, and never allow any one to approach.
The natives take them in pits sunk in the ground, which are wide enough for the birds to
fall into, and deep enough to be completely concealed. They are slightly covered with
straw. The geese, when wandering about in such spots and getting on to the pits,
usually raise their wings, but not finding any support for their feet, fall through, and
are then unable to escape.

Here it may be remarked that I cannot in the least understand why Brandt, who
established the genus Cyguopsis for this species, included therein the Canadian goose
(Leucoblepharon canadensis); there being no reason for bringing these widely different

1 Of course; as also the females, like all other geese, swans, ducks, and flamingoes.

182 Geese of Europe and Asia

birds together. The classification of birds, and of animals generally, still contains, how-
ever, much that is quite unintelligible.

The swan-goose, under the name of the Chinese goose, is very widely spread in the
domesticated state, and is just as tame in this state as the ordinary domesticated grey goose.
Externally the swan-goose shows, however, a considerable difference in the structure of
the bill, the slight swelling at the base of the bill in the wild bird being converted in the
tame breed into a large round tubercle, of such a size that it quite changes the whole
outward appearance of the head, while at the same time the bill becomes shorter and
thicker. Pallas supposed that this development might be due to crossing with the mute
swan, but it is hardly needful to have recourse to such a hypothesis, as apparently the
rudiment of a gland in the wild swan-goose, under the influence of food and a different
mode of life, assumes abnormally large proportions. It is also a curious fact that in the
domesticated birds, which retain more or less the colour of their wild ancestors, the bill
remains black, while in the white breed the bill becomes red. The tame breed of this
species considerably exceeds the wild form in size, being sometimes of very large size
and weight. I think there is little doubt that it was large birds of this type, with the
colouring of their wild congeners,—perhaps a cross between wild and large tame birds,—
that were noticed by Gmelin and then described by Pallas under the name of иде’
gvandis, as it seems impossible to make this description fit any other known species of
goose.

é

ee te
iy

ey

ae ad

ВХ

}

NR, ©. В: СОВЕЕ-ОХ THE EGGS OF -RUSSIAN GEESE

Tus article, kindly placed at the disposal of the author of the present work by the well-known
zoologist and odlogist, Mr. G. Е. Gdébel, affords the only satisfactory basis for further odlogical
investigations in the sub-family Azservine, and on this account presents great interest, so that its
publication will, Г am confident, be acceptable to all ornithologists. I have made no other change
than replacing the original nomenclature by that adopted in the body of this work.

“The colour of the eggs of all kinds of geese is white, but the shell of some, especially those
that are coarse-grained,’ easily acquires a dingy yellow or grey colouring, probably from the lining of
the nest, which becomes damp from the moisture remaining on the feathers of the brooding goose.
This colour sinks so deep into the pores of the shell that it cannot by any means be washed off
I have never yet seen a pure white egg of MWelanonyx arvensis, whose nest is placed on the tundra bogs
and near the woody:lakes of Lapland. It is always covered with a yellowish layer, while the eggs of
Melanonyx segetum, which builds its nest on dry tussocks near the lakes in Novaia Zemlia, are only by
way of exception stained throughout yellow, most of them having only yellow blotches, while some
are quite white. The eggs of М. brachyrhynchus from Spitzbergen, judging from two clutches brought
thence by Mr. A. A. Byalynitsky-Birulei, assume a grey tinge. I accordingly suppose that the water
along the shores of the Lapland and Novaia Zemlia lakes must be stained yellow (more often in the
former than in the latter country), owing to a peaty or ferruginous soil, which is wanting in the lakes 3
of Spitzbergen, in the breeding-places of JZ. brachyrhynchus.’

On even a cursory inspection, the eggs of the bean-geese® are easy to distinguish from those
of other groups by the very coarse grain of their shell; their surface being extremely uneven. In respect
of the coarseness (roughness) or smoothness of the structure of the shell, the eggs of the geese may
be placed in the following order, beginning with the roughest: MMJelanonyx arvensis, М. segetum,
М. brachyrhynchus, Chen hyperboreus, Anser albifrons, A. gambelt, A. anser, Eulabeta indica, Cygnopsts
cygnoides, Branta bernicla, B. nigricans, and Rufibrenta ruficolhs.

As I have not to hand authenticated eggs of other species, [ cannot give their characteristics ; but
there is good reason to believe that the structure of the shell of those of A. fwmarchicus resembles that of
A. albifrons and A. gambeli. Of A. finmarchicus | have had in my hands only one authenticated clutch,
which, unfortunately, in descending a hill was broken. None of the eggs which have been sent me,
inclusive of those from Schliiter, proved to belong to A. fimmarchicus, but all pertained to other kinds of
geese. The structure of the shell of IZ. arvensis sibiricus and М. segetum serrirostris* must be like that of
other bean-geese.

1 Mr, Gébel’s MS., although written in Russian, has the expression das Zorn.

2 All these hypotheses are very probable, but so far as I know at present, М. brachyrhynchus nests (on Spitzbergen) on rocky cliffs,
towering above the sea and not near lakes, which, however, in no way militates against our odlogist’s supposition in regard to the colouring
of the eggs.

3 де. geese which I in the present work put under Buturlin’s genus Ме/апонух.

4 And perhaps a third—J/, mentalis, Oates, also nesting in Siberia.

185 2B

186 Geese of Europe and Asia

In the Zoological Museum of the Academy of Science at St. Petersburg are three eggs of a large
goose from Eastern Siberia, undoubtedly belonging to one of these two species,’ but to which I am, of
course, unable to say—although, probably, to the larger of the two, since these eggs are very large and,
although of the same size, are comparatively much lighter than those of A. anser.

The structure of the shell of eggs of species akin to Anser or Eulabeia indica, Chen hyperboreus,
Cygnopsis cygnoides, and the group of black-legged species must, I think, be like that of the aforesaid
groups. ‘The grain of the shell in these groups may be characterised somewhat as follows (seen under а
glass magnifying six times) :—

(т) The grain of the shell in the eggs of the large bean-geese (J/e/anonyx) shows conspicuous eleva-
tions, surrounded and severed from each other by wide zones, or corone, of very irregular
outline, as it were deeply eroded out of the shell.

(2) The grain of the shell in the white-fronted species produces the impression, when looked at with
the naked eye, of rather coarse marble. Under the glass, the surface, which seemed fairly
smooth, is seen, however, to consist of a mass of elevations thickly crowded on each other.

(3) The grain of the shell of the eggs of the snow-geese (Chen) resembles that of the white-fronted
geese, but the elevations are more noticeable and do not stand so close together. There is
accordingly sufficient space between them to permit of their becoming soiled, as may be seen in
the egg belonging to the Zoological Museum of the Imperial Academy of Science at St.
Petersburg.

(4) The grain of the shell in the eggs of the grey-lag (Azser anser) looks as if an originally very
coarse shell had been subjected to careless polishing ; traces of the eroded portions remaining
on the shell in the shape of short serrated lines, formed by long scars, as if in the depressions
between them something like white powder had been left.

(5) The grain of the shell in the eggs of the swan-geese (Cyguopsis) is smooth and of a crystalline
character. It approaches in granulation the shells of Bewick’s swan.

(6) The grain of the shell in the eggs of the group of black-legged geese is exceedingly smooth, with
hardly perceptible pores. It approaches that of the shells of ducks’ eggs.

_I fully recognise that it is impossible to describe more accurately the structure of the shell, for the
simple reason that it is difficult to find descriptive terms commonly intelligible ; and I therefore confine
myself to these general characters which afford a starting-point in the determination of goose-eggs. If, in
doing so, I use expressions of a somewhat unscientific character, I hope I shall not be called to account.
So-called scientific descriptions of the structure of the shell (when such are given) have never enabled me to
reproduce an even approximate picture of the pattern on the surface of the shell, with the exception of
those of old Thienemann, which exist, unfortunately, only in the shape of separate fragments for a few
groups of birds.

As great confusion would have been avoided in the goose-question if later ornithologists had availed
themselves of the descriptions of the species in the works of Naumann, which for some reason remained
for a long time in complete neglect, so odlogy would have made great strides and not have still remained
in its infancy if ornithologists had made use of the foundation so strongly laid by Thienemann, who, three-
quarters of a century ago, divined, in his strictly scientific studies of eggs, that the chief characters for the
true determination are included in the structure of the shell, 4.6.11 its grain and in the weight of the egg,
and by no means only in colouring and dimensions. The last character is indeed almost devoid of import-
ance, since, notwithstanding its considerable variation, the length of the egg with the diameter constant
exerts but very little influence on the weight.

Unfortunately, a working knowledge of the structure of the grain of the shell is greatly hindered by
Se a eh ee И Е eae ee ee
1 In view of the confusion between М. arvensis stbiricus and the large ЛМ. segetum serrirostris and, finally, М. mentalis, it is
impossible as yet to say anything positive; but owing to the size of the eggs, and especially the abundance in Siberia of М. arvensis
stbtricus, it must be supposed that the eggs in the St, Petersburg Zoological Museum belong to this species: AUTHOR.

Appendix 1 187

the impossibility of exact description. Only, indeed, by means of micro-photography would it be possible
to render the descriptions intelligible to odlogists other than specialists.

As I have said, almost imperceptible differences of structure in the shells of the eggs of closely
related birds cannot be expressed by words alone. To describe the characters of the eggs of a whole group
(genus) to a certain extent is indeed possible, but in describing a separate species one has to be satisfied in
the majority of cases with a remark like “the egg of this species, while possessing all the characters of the
group, has a coarser or rougher surface, in which are absent or present the pores, which in their turn are
deeper or shallower, broad or narrow,” and so on.

Having taken an egg with such extreme characters as the point of departure, the eggs of other
species can only be compared with it in proportion to the more or less marked resemblance of their grain
to one another, and to that of the fundamental form. Such comparisons are, however, only possible when
you have types before you; in the absence of these, or, at any rate, of micro-photographic impressions,
the best assistance for the determination of closely related eggs of one colour is afforded by tables, which
allow of the comparison of the weight of the eggs (ze. shells) of various species possessing either
approximate or equal dimensions. In the annexed table, what at once strikes the eye is the fact that the
weight is much more nearly correlated with the breadth than with the length of the egg, and that it is also
in close connection with the structure of the shell, the outward sign of which is its grain.

From their external appearance alone, the extremely solid, hard shell of the eggs of Amser anser,
Ful. indica, and С. cygnordes, coupled with their greater weight, allows of their easy distinction from the

—

TABLE OF WEIGHT, BREADTH, AND LENGTH OF EGGS OF ANSERINA:

WEIGHT IN CENTIGRAMMES,

Bee) Maing | EEO sae]. in cane te aa Ee eee le ance: Ca eee Ope
65 87 x oe 59 go 2310
64 85.5 2244 ВИ 58 1866
O2.5 95.5 2252 i 87 2142
88.5 2352 ae 56.5 1980 ae
63 94 2430 eet 56 ee 1500 es
89.5 2400 om 84 oi me 1320 aise
89 | oe | ae 83.5 a a ыы 1512
62.5 90.5 2076 Phe 83 1698 me
62 94 2214 ae | SI я. a ЕЕ
QI 2040 ae 76 a) 1440
89 РАЯ Sue 58.5 89 1830 fe
88.5 2010 a 88 2052
86.5 1860 1680 86 1932
84.5 1938 ae 85 GRO)
61.5 89.5 2004 mS 84.5 1716 Vi ae
87.5 2130 84 AEs 1278 x on 1422
бт 95 2298 ee | 78 у и rs м
92 2004 Re 58 89.5 a тах и 172
2112
QI 1932 | 87 5 2022
go 2004 i 87 1692 1536
88.5 1950. Ras | 56 1908 a ne
87.5 IQI4 85 we 1338
60.5 89.5 2052 84 ie. 1248
( 1308
88.5 1go2 | 83.5 1500 о |
85 21752 a 82.5 1842 1398 oa 1392
бо 87.5 1980 ок бо a a 1212 A oe
86 x sce 57. 5 O75 Mee om та 1560
59-5 90.5 1944 me | 85 fe в x er
87.5 1890 ee 83 Mis x ae
85.5 ie 1476 81.5 1878
85 1830 Aes Е. ‘ie

188 Geese of Europe and Asia

eggs of the group of bean-geese (JZe/anonyx), the porosity of whose shells at once indicates their com-
paratively small weight; while the delicate appearance of the shell of the eggs of the black-legs clearly
indicates their comparatively slight weight. The annexed table must, accordingly, serve as the chief aid
to the determination of the eggs of the species of geese quoted.

This table, unfortunately, is still rather meagre, owing to the lack of sufficient material determined
with absolute accuracy: but any one who has undoubted specimens can supplement the lacune in the
table and thus render it more nearly perfect.

The weight of imperfectly cleaned eggs must never be entered in the table, and the observer must
be satisfied by putting, in place of their weight, the sign x or ? in the respective column, to show that the
egg of the dimensions given was unfit to weigh in consequence of not being perfectly clean. ‘The insertion
of a shell not of the true weight would render the table valueless. In its present form the table gives an
experienced observer a comparatively large amount of material for determinations; and it may even
prevent an amateur from purchasing or placing in his collection eggs which have been wrongly determined.

TABLE OF WEIGHT, BREADTH, AND LENGTH OF EGGS OF ANSERINA‘—Continued.

WEIGHT IN CENTIGRAMMES.
ee ae Ans. anser. = г о р >. eens Eulabeia indica. Anser albifrons. =
Gi 85 | ae = = x
84 | a | а | 1272 ee
83 | Ar | x | a x
: 79.5 | 1620 | oe | a | Be | ae ae
56.5 88.5 | es | ay | es | xe ee 1248
ОТ. 5 om | res | a | a: 1422 ...
56 87.5 ее | x Е ae
| 86 eee | ec x
84 Bee 1590
oes | 1308 ae
8 | 8 >
: ee : | 1530 |
SI | x ae 5 1188
80 | i re 1104
79.5 | 1290 т 1500
79 | oe | an ТЕГО =:
78.5 | | He 1362
| 78 ae | re | 1074 ue
55.5 88 en | 1350 | as
87 я | я | 1296
84 ве | ie 1266 rater
83.5 | | ae 1500 ae
82. 5 | 98 Il 46
82 | eee | am, | 1278 ee
81.5 | ie | ee 1314 eae sa ...
Эт | a saath 1308 я = 1092
бо | fas | ws 1308 tf
fee ee, Bs ae 1098
55 | 82 | Ps 1398 ani
bags | 1266 at
SI | 1260
79 | 1230
| 3

1 | consider it not superfluous to note here that the eggs of 4. anser, С. cygnoides, and other domesticated races must by по means
serve to make good the omissions. Eggs laid in captivity must always be regarded as more or less abnormal, and in no case as typical.—
<; Е. СОВЕЕ.

Appendix I

1389

TABLE OF WEIGHT, BREADTH, AND LENGTH OF EGGS OF АМЗЕВТМ А — Continued

Breadth in mm.

Length in mm.

Ans. anser.

Melanonyx
segetum.

un
aE
on

54

52
51.5
co

TOR 5

1524

WEIGHT IN CENTIGRAMMES,

| .
uv n 3 4 a : a Е a a
м a Е : 2 Be : : : Е Е Ее
5 ag 5= os Е Ф ‘a a Se] я я ВР c=
Е
Я 5 ae ы нЕ ais = т = aa 3 зы о
52] 0S By 20 3 УЕ я Sg q op Ф во = = .50 eS
Oe crs Е Е 9 а Е о 5 2 138 & ea |953
2 Ot < < 5 =e ea = ее ea Е
51 79 714 ...
ae то ях = 726
: 50.5 | 78.5 666
1086 74. 5 а:
Е | 1062 50 84.5 x
ТТТО в ть =
nese 75 744
... 1038 71 =e, 726
| 1374 ... Ara a= O75 Те ib es
... x 48.5 71.5 x
J 1038 | 48 73.5 678
( 996 | 72 м
1092 oe 68 ae 627
ne Ae ТАБ ... 654
о 41 72 о oe
1194 ee HO) eae x ee
Г rrro | A5 72 600
| TO50 |
Е ОО
1176 1062
fee 4950
2 ОО
1302
1260
x eee
о
x
не | x
ante) aia
TO50 |
| x
|
| |

add for convenience ashort tablecontaining the mean, тахипит, ап4 minimum dimensions and weight
of the eggs placed in the main table, beginning with the heaviest and ending with the lightest specimens.

Number
of eggs.

Weight in centigrammes.

А. anser

_C. cygnoides

Е. indica

M. segetum

М. arvensis ;
С. hyperboreus .
A. gambeli

A. albifrons
М. brachyrhynchus
B. bernicla

B. bernicla nigricans .

R. ruficollis

Breadth in mm. Length in mm.
Mean. | Max. Min. Mean. Max. Min.
60.3 OL se meeps 82.2 95.5 79.5
55-6 59 53 81.6 89.5 76
ВЯ. 58.5 56 80.6 52.5 78
57-9 62 53 83.7| 88 76
56.8 59 54 81.9} 87 74.5
52.5 52.5 52.5 89.5] 89.5) 89.5
55.25 | 56 54.5| 83 85 SI
53.9 56.5 49.5) 81 38.5 76
51.5 РЕ 50 80.9 84.5 76
48.1 51 OV ЕЕ 79 71
5 TF 78.5) 68
45 ASS > AS 72 72 72

| Mean.

——<— ————_—_<_<§_§_§_—

2002 |
1423
ттт
1380
P254
1230
1179
1098
IO50

715 |
690
600

Max.

2442
1590
1A22
1080
1338
1230
1188
1248
1050

756

744

боо

Min.

I170
996
IO50
678
627
600

Note.—Number of specimens
furnishing weight.

48

Weight from
ere oS

> Dy)

The most oblong shape belongs to С. Zyperboreus, the shortest to Е. tudtca.

ГОО

Geese of Europe and Asia

The mean long diameter exceeds the mean short diameter in—

C. hyperboreus

М. brachyrhynchus .

A. anser

A. gambeli
A. albifrons
R. ruficollis

by 37

29.4
27.9
27.75

27.2

27

С. cygnoides .

М. segetum

М. arvensis

В. bernicla

В. bernicla nigricans
Е. indica

by 26° im:

у

я
25.1 5s
25 ”
24.15 ›
р a

С. GOBEL.

|

EXTRACT FROM THE Diary OF THE VISIT то KOLGUEV IN 1902 OF Mr. 5. А. Вотовлм,

KINDLY COMMUNICATED BY THE AUTHOR

On August 9, 1902, I landed on Kolguev. On the same morning the members of the Norwegian
expedition, who were going to winter on Matochkin Shar, killed, near Bugrino Stanovishchi, a pair
of true white-fronted geese (Ч ие’ albtfrons), which Г examined an hour or two after they were shot.
Their feet were yellow-orange, bills pale milky rose-colour, with a very slight tint of purple (or lilac)
and a scarcely perceptible admixture of yellow at the very edges of the nostrils, between the rami of
the lower mandible and in the middle of the culmen of the upper mandible (nail pale horn, like human
nail’), They were old birds almost moulted.

The same day I saw in the possession of Vasili Petrovich Popov from Pustozero, who had
been here already ten days with his schooner, a bean-goose (MMe/anonyx segetunz), killed the previous day
(August 8), with an oval, slightly bent nail, short massive bill (not accurately measured), 23 teeth
on each side of the upper mandible, and typical (for this bird) annular extension of the yellow-orange
colouring of the bill. This was an old moulted bird. I did not take this bird from the Popov, but,
at his proposal, removed the heads and bills (Nos. 410-414 of my collection) of the bean-geese taken the
same day. |
On August 11 Father Platon Kulakov received as а present from the Samoyeds several freshly
killed geese, of which there fell to my lot four heads of bean-geese and the head of a white-front
with colouring similar to the above.

During an excursion to the river Vaskina, on August 13, when crossing the river Kambalya, in
the early morning, a flock of some half-dozen bean-geese were put up from the flooded land; and during
the day two pairs of bean-geese flew over our camp on the Vaskina, but far off.

On August 16 I was on the Promoinaya Gulf. This extensive sheet of shoal water, not less
than 25 square versts, is separated by a narrow sand-bar from the ocean, with which it communicates
by a strait about roo fathoms wide. Even to my eye, already familiar with the vast boggy valleys of
the Kolguev tundra, the neighbourhood of Pomoinaya Guba produced the impression of a perfect plane
stretching for miles, Far to the north appeared the crests of the “Yurennye Sorlopy” (‘“sorlopy ”
are high river-cliffs) and the rounded summit of the Dorozhkina Зорка (cone) ; but even the insignificant
sand-dunes (20 to 25 feet high) on the bar, trending westwards, produced the effect of hills in this
monotonous plain.

The whole of this sand-flat, interspersed with mud, carrying the scantiest and poorest vegetation,
is thickly dotted with pools, meres, and lakes of the most heterogeneous sizes and forms, in one part
widely scattered, but in another connected by a whole labyrinth of channels with more or less stagnant
water. Such of the smaller of these sheets as are fresh water are probably the result of snow and rain;
but others are sensibly brackish, and contain myriads of marine crustaceans.

1 де. of quite the same colouring as indicated by myself in the article on this goose, and at the same time as the description of the
American variety, Anser albifrons gambeli, as if in distinction from the European form,

ТОТ

192 Geese of Europe and Asia

On approaching the bay, it is impossible to tell where the land ends and water begins; the
absolutely flat land gradually and imperceptibly passing into the unruffled surface of the bay, the mire
merely becoming gradually thinner, and the foot sinking deeper and deeper at every step. А few
hundred paces from the first pools and inlets of the bay the mud is quite liquid, but small hummocks and.
elevations from one to two inches high project above the water, and half a mile from the shore the gulls
wander about without wetting their feathers.

In this locality, indeed, we may actually see the formation of land; according to my friend
Yablya, who was born on Kolguev forty-three years ago, the whole of this vast plain being still flooded
by the sea during high autumn tides. |

The dead monotony of these boundless stretches of sand, mud, and water is relieved by ап
extraordinary wealth of bird-life; species like Calcarius lapponicus, Otocoris alpestris, and Anthus
cervinus continually rising before our reindeer, while here and there may be seen examples of
Motacilla alba. More abundant is Larus glaucus, and still more numerous L. affinis, individuals of
which hovered in alarm above our heads; while from all sides are heard the harsh notes of Colymbus
septentrionalis and С. arcticus. Scores of the timid Charadrius pluvials scud away on all sides, while
numbers of Sguatarola helvetica and Atgtalitis hiaticula rise into the air with loud cries in the distance,
their melodious notes resounding in the light haze pierced by the sun’s rays. | |

Here and there on the meres appear broods of Harelda glacialis and Somateria spectabths,
while flocks of Phalaropus hyperboreus are swimming off the shore, which allow the stranger to come
within a few paces. Flocks of Zyringa minuta and 7. temmtnckz, and thousands and thousands of
Tringa subarguata (on their way from Taimyr to the coasts of Western Europe), fill the air with their
faint pipings, and alight at one moment on the sludge, at another on the water of the shallow bay hundreds
of paces from the shore, covering whole acres as they run in the shallow water.

This Promoinaya Bay and its environs form one of the favourite collecting-grounds of the moulting
Kolguev geese.

We were late for the moulting-time and the Samoyed goose-drives, which this year were far less
successful than they used to be two or three years ago (when one drive alone yielded 7000 birds) ; but
footprints and droppings were everywhere to be seen, and small flocks of bean-geese kept passing
high overhead.

In one narrow but long lake near the bay itself we saw a pair of geese in the distance. As we
approached the spot, these landed on the opposite shore, but Yablya’s dog gave chase, and finding
it safer not to continue on land, they returned to the water, where we shot them, after firing several
times. No other geese were seen near the lake; but some hours later, when we were again passing the
lake on our way back, a solitary goose was seen, which allowed me to get near, and was accordingly
shot. While I was thinking how to retrieve it, a second goose appeared, not on the wing but from
somewhere on the shore. I fired twice at long range; after the first shot it dived, and after the
second flew heavily off the lake ; but two more shots brought it down and the dog retrieved it.

Both these were young bean-geese.! The first had much down left on the lesser wing-coverts,
the upper side of the neck, the rump, and thighs; while the flight-feathers had scarcely emerged from the
stumps. The total length from the end of the bill to the end of the tail was 521 mm. The second
was already fully fledged, but the wings were not quite grown. Total length,670 mm. Their legs
were yellow-orange, much obscured with dingy grey; bills dark, with traces of a lighter band and a whitish
tip to the dark nail.

August 17—a magnificent, warm sunny day—we passed on the Vaskina; the day before we went
to bed very late, and I rose at noon and crept out of the tent to bathe in the river. The tent stood оп.
a rising on the right bank, twelve feet above the river. Scarcely had I got fifteen paces from the

1 One of these (No. 443) was quite correctly determined by Mr. Buturlin as М. arvensis, as the nail on the upper mandible occupies
no more than one-fourth of the culmen. Besides this, its head is considerably lighter than in the young geese from Kolguev, which I consider
undoubted М. segetum (Nos. 432, 433, 434, 436, and 437 of the same collection). 1 doubt, however, whether the darker “earthy”
colouring of the head in the young М. segetum of this age and the lighter brown of young М. arvensis can serve as а sufficient character
to distinguish these two species of geese, as the young in down of many lamellirostres present great variations in colouring.

Appendix I] 193

tent, when I saw, on the very spot where I proposed bathing, a large flock of geese. Cautiously retiring
behind the crest of the steep bank, I rushed back to the tent, and having snatched up my Winchester,
stealthily returned. The geese were still there, drinking and cropping the grass. As it was too near
to shoot (some 25 paces from the crest over which I was looking), I resolved to approach the geese
quietly and shoot the biggest on the wing. Great was my astonishment when the geese not only
did not rise on my appearing over the crest, but paid no attention to me whatever. I approached
closer and counted them. There were 18 birds of different ages, the young ones being three-quarters
the size of the adults, with traces of down; the biggest were quite as large as full-grown bean-geese.

Only when I walked on openly, and was but a fathom from the flock, did the young birds, after an
exchange of low cacklings, unwillingly move down-stream along the bank. Having followed them some
70 paces as far as the widening of the flooded land, I decided to drive them away from the river.
I succeeded in doing this, but, apparently alarmed by my importunity, the whole flock quickened its step
and set off Юг a small lake 100 paces from the river. Here I scattered the flock by shouting and
throwing earth at them, and eventually brought down the biggest bird. At the shot, part of the flock
made for the lake, and part for the river and higher tundra, the larger birds half flying. One of the
largest did not run at the report of the gun, but threw itself down on the ground, with outstretched neck.
By chance, instead of being in the grass, it was on dry moss, so that, however close it lay, it still
remained in full view. Notwithstanding, it allowed me to approach quite close, and while I walked
round it two or three times at a distance of only 2 or 3 feet, it lay motionless as if dead, although
watching me the whole time with its large dark eyes.!

At last I put my gun down on the moss, and threw myself on the goose, which, however,
dexterously extricated itself and started off at a sharp pace, arching its back and stretching forward
its head. At this moment my two companions—Yablya and Nikolai Ledkov (a young Samoyed from
Novaia Zemlia)—came up, and caught both this and another young bird. In both specimens the bill
was dark, but the narrow subterminal band was already faintly indicated by its paler colour. I was loth
to kill them, and so set them free on the river, where they dived and swam about for a long time in full
view of our tent.

It must be added that we passed most of the 15th in the same place and saw no geese, although
we went round the neighbourhood shooting; but in the evening of the 15th and on the 16th we were
at the mouth of the Vaskina and on Promoinaya Bay, the tent and part of the sleighs remaining
as we left them.

During the latter day three more old bean-geese flew past ; and I then learned from the Samoyeds
that although they knew the barnacle (Вуди! leucopsis, Bechst.), they did not know definitely whether it
breeds, as, according to their statement, it is very rarely met with, but they were of opinion that
it does not nest.

On August 18 we drove from the Vaskina to Krivoe Lake, thence to the Sovandei and
Anuru Hills, and on the evening of the 21st to our base of operations—the church at the mouth
of the Bugrina (Bugrino Stanovishche), without detecting any trace of geese. On the 23rd the
Samoyeds brought one old Axser albtfrons, showing the rosy colouring of the bill already described, and
a pair of bean-geese, one of which had 20 and the other 25 teeth on each side of the upper mandible,
while the nails in both were oval and slightly arched; the bill was mostly black with an annular
area of yellow. One was a young Je/anonyx, which I added to the collection.’

Starting the same day (August 23) for Stanovoi Sharok, I saw a pair of bean-geese—
passing over the Bugrina. Farther on the road to the Sharok, and from Sharok to the mouth of the
Peschanka, we saw no geese, and not till the 26th did I see a pair in the distance (I think bean-geese),
near the southern end of Peschanoe Lake. Nevertheless, the deep lands near the sea, between the rivers
Barkho and Peschanka, and the Peschanoe Lake are, like Promoinaya Bay (and the Goose Lakes), the
headquarters for the wholesale catch of moulting geese—only earlier in the year, in the summer.

1 This specimen was undoubtedly a young yellow-bill, as the nail occupies only one-fourth of the total length of the upper mandible.

2 М. segetum, with 24 teeth on each side of the upper mandible.
28

194 Geese of Europe and Asia

It is here worth noting that anent Mr. Trevor-Battye’s account of the taking of thousands of
moulting geese on Kolguev, I have read in certain sporting magazines articles expressing indignation,
and calling upon the authorities to put a stop to such barbarities. One must, however, know something
of local conditions to understand the absurdity of such philippics.

In the first place, even if the “proper authorities” wished to protect the geese of Kolguev
at the expense of the natives of Kolguev, they have not, as a matter of fact, the means to carry out -
such a plan. Kolguev is neither Pavlovsk nor Pargolovo. ‘There is no local “authority,” and not a
single Russian mission ; it is not so easy to get to that lonely nook in the Arctic Ocean, protected as it
is by shoals, fogs, storms, and ice-floes. It is quite unlike Novaia Zemlia, with its deep bays shut in by
high shores.

In the second place, the Samoyeds are extremely humane, good-hearted people, incapable of
cruelty to animals, and lazy like all Asiatics. If they take the trouble to organise an annual hunt of
moulting geese (while strictly avoiding molesting them in the pairing and hatching season—a sensible
measure, the utility of which many of our ‘intelligent’ sportsmen have yet to learn), this is because they
cannot do otherwise. The Samoyed must eat, and it is not easy to be a vegetarian in 69° N. lat. (the
sole “fruit of the earth” being the cloud-berry, which ripens then in large quantities, but by no means
every year). He cannot put to sea in his cockle-shell boats; and fish in the lakes on the island (Sado
and, more particularly, various species of Covegonus) is not plentiful. Wild reindeer there are none, and
the tame beasts, serving both as a medium of exchange and as animals of draught, cannot be slaughtered
ad libitum for food. Moreover, a considerable proportion of the latter are considered to belong to the
Russian traders from Pustozero. It is for these reasons that the Samoyeds lay in a stock of geese’ to
feed themselves and their dogs during the long and dreary winter.

A real evil, yet one in nowise to be averted by prescriptions from the authorities, are the drives
of ‘“turpan,” as the king-eider (Somateria spectabzlis) is here called (the turpan of Russian writers,
(Edemia fusca, is here very rare, according to the Samoyeds, and I have not seen it at all). Instead
of consuming hundreds and thousands of turpan every year, it would be much more profitable for the
Samoyeds (and the Pustozero traders as well) not to touch them at all, but merely gather the eider-down
from the nests and barter it to the Pustozero people for flour and reindeer-meat.

Only on August 27, on returning from Peschanoe Lake to Stanovoi Sharok, did I see the
first large flocks of brent (probably Branta brenta), seemingly ready to migrate.

During the following days flock after flock of brent flew off south, overtaking us on our return
to Bugrino Stanovishche and settling on the sand-banks of the shore and the muddy stretches in the
river valleys. Especially large numbers of them were seen on September 1 and 2 in the lower
reaches of the Bugrina and on the shoals at its mouth. The valley here widens out to half a verst, and
the sand-banks project more than a verst into the extensive bay. Here, particularly towards evening,
the brent gathered in flocks of several hundred each.

On September 2 I noticed among them a separate gaggle of 11 bean-geese.

The brent (Branta brenta) during its passage evidently kept more to the seashore ; and after
starting from Bugrino Stanovishche to the north across the middle of the island, we ceased to meet them.
On the other hand, during this journey, on September 2, on the Kekurnoi Pervy, in the hills, and on the
Peschanka, we were constantly seeing skeins and wedges of bean-geese (A/e/anonyx sp.) flying south.
They did not gather in such masses as the brent, although on the whole there were many on the wing, and
often flock followed close on flock and they kept their formation, while the brent usually flew without any
definite order. Some of these flocks alighted to rest on the sands of the valley of the Peschanka.

On the following day, September 3, we continued to meet flocks of bean-geese, usually of from
8 to 15 birds each, either passing high in the air, with their wonted cackle, or sitting on the sands of
the more considerable streams (e.g. the Gusinaya).

1 How important the geese are in the economy of the Kolguev Samoyeds appears from the fact that, although the island and the
reindeer pastures, and the collecting of drift-wood are common property for the general use, the places where the goose-drives occur are
strictly apportioned.— BUTURLIN.

Appendix II 195

Footprints and droppings of geese were met with in large quantities everywhere on the shores of
the Gusinyya Ozera (Goose Lakes) mentioned above.

On the same day, in the lower part of the valley of the Goose River, I started a goodly gaggle of
brent, and in the evening, at its very mouth, some 26 geese of larger size, which from their call I took to
be white-fronts (Azser albifrons), but was unable to get any.

Next day, the 4th, on the lower course of the Goose River, [ saw many flocks of geese, containing
from то to 40 individuals apiece, mainly Branta brenta, but there were also Axser albifrons and
Melanonyx.

In crossing from the far side of the Gusinaya back to camp, I started one of these flocks from the
grassy terrace of the valley, but one young bird went on browsing the grass until I got within shot, and
only then flew up, but fell to my gun. This was a brent of the year’s brood, with very considerable
white patches on the neck and typical in the colouring of the belly. The stomach, besides grass,
contained seeds.

On my way back, on the 5th, I saw in the valley of the Peschanka several flocks of brent and a
small skein of bean-geese—13 in all—a number not seldom recurring in their flocks. On this and the next
day we met, farther on, and in the valley of the Bugrina, skeins of bean-geese passing south.

In the mouth of the Bugrina, on the following Чауз— то to 13th—masses of brent arrived, and
kept usually near the shore. We more than once shot at them at 600 to 700 paces, but without success.

By the middle of September there were very many brent-geese, both on the strand and the lower
reaches of the rivers ; while in the latter spots there were likewise many flocks of bean-geese, of which there
were also plenty on the lakes of the low tundra, where they usually gathered towards evening, raising a
loud cackle.

On September 19 the V/adimir came in and took us away from Kolguev.

When we approached Novaia Zemlia it was covered with snow. On September 23 it froze
hard in Moller Gulf, the day temperature fell to —3°C., and the night much lower; on the 25th at
Matochkin Shar it reached —34° С. According to the members of the Norwegian expedition, at night
the temperature fell to —10° C., and it was about a fortnight after almost all the waterfowl had left
that I found the river Matochka and the lakes indeed frost-bound. |

The Norwegians (Mr. Korin) showed me ап example of Branta brenta, shot a week before from
a passing flock of a hundred, and also some specimens obtained in the neighbourhood during the
beginning of their stay at Matochkin Shar, undoubtedly of geese nesting there. Some of them were
Melanonyx segetum, others undoubted М. neglectus.

The next day I was to come and choose some examples for my collection, by the kind offer of the
Norwegians, but a most violent storm kept us on Novaia Zemlia, and did not allow of communication
with the shore.

According to the old resident Prokopi Vylka (one of the best traders and most intelligent of the _
Samoyeds), five different kinds of geese occur here :—

т. ‘Big goose’’—evidently different species of Me/anonyx.

2. “ Little black goose, varra’”—evidently Branta brenta.

3. ‘“Norovoi, face and bill white, small”—probably Auser albzfrons.

4. “ Bill black, tail fairly long, belly white, small, called segobya,’—is not this Branta leucopsts, ог
Branta brenta glaucogaster?

5. “ Mottled, called lab.” —I think Rufibrenta тис, as Vylka notes its scarceness ; but Mr.
Trevor-Battye gives the name “ labédo” as Samoyed for Branta leucopsts ; he might, however, be mistaken.

)

5. BuTurRLIN.

January 16, 1903, MARIENBURG, LIFLAND.

Anas bernicla, 150, 162, 171

brenta, 162
canadicus, 20
canagica, 20
cygnoides, 176
erythropus, 42, 59, 171
fabalis, 94
hyperborea, 12
hyperboreus, 12
гпойса, 133
leucopsis, 171
monachus, 15
nivalis, 18
orientalis, 177
vuficollts, ТА.
segetum, 94

Anser, 24
albatus, 13
albifrons, 42
albifrons gambelt, 43
ай Рой; minutus, 60
albtfrons rosetpes, 43
anser, 24
arvensts, 94

bernicla, 150, 158, 162, 172

brachyrhynchus, 78, 87
brenta, 150, 162

brenta glaucogaster, 151
brenta leucogaster, 151
brenta torquatus, 151
brevirostris, 60, 87

INDEX

Anser guineensis, 176
hutchinst, 166
hyperboreus, 12
hyperboreus nivalis, 18
indica, 133
271045, 133
intermedius, 43
leuconyx, 95
leucopareius, 166
leucopsis, 171, 172
medius, 43, 78
melanocephalus, 133
mentalis, 130
middendorffit, 95, 104
minutus, 60
muscoviticus, 176
neglectus, 78
nigricans, 162
oatest, 78
obscurus, 78
pallipes, 43
paludosus, 95
palustris, 26
phenicopus, 87
pictus, 20
pulchricollés, 141
rhodorhynchus, 60
rubtrostris, 26
rufescens, 87, 120
rujicollis, 141

segetum, 78, 87, 94, 104, ТО, 120

Bernicla brenta, 151, 162
brenta glaucogaster, 151
brenta nigricans, 162
canadensis hutchinst, 166
canagica, 20
collaris, 151
erythropus, 172
glaucogaster, 151
hutchinst, 166
гипса, 133
leucopareta, 166
leucopsts, 172
melanopsis, 151
micropus, 151
minor, 171
nigricans, 162
pallida, 151
platyuros, 151
vuficollts, 141
lorguata, 151, 162

Bernicle, 150

Black brant, 162
goose, 150

Blacknebs, 87

Bog goose, 94, 110

Brand goose, 158

Brant, 158

Branta, 150
albifrons, 42
bernicla, 150
bernicla glaucogaster, 158

brucht, 43 segetum arvensis, 95 bernicla nigricans, 162
canadensis, 166, 172 segetum brachyrhynchus, 87 brenta, 151, 162
canagicus, 20 segetum muiddendorffit, 95, 104, 123, 130 canadensis hutchinst, 166
carnetrostris, 120 segetum 56771705715, 95, 104, 123 hutchinst, 166

casarka, 42 septentrionalis sylvestris, 42 leucopareta, 166
cineraceus, 26, 60 serrtvostris, 123 leucopsts, 172

cinereus, 25, 87 serrirostris middendorffit, 104 nigricans, 162

cinereus albtifrons, 26
cinereus 71017051715, 26
cygnoides, 176
cygnotdes ferus, 177
erythropus, 43, 60, 171
erythropus minutus, 60
fabalis, 95, 110

ferus, 26, 87, 110
ferus vulgaris, 26
jinmarchicus, 59
Jrontalis, 43

gambelt, 43
glaucogaster, 158
grandis, 104, 139, 177

Sinensts, 177
Skorniakost, 133
sylvestris, 26, 94, ТО
Zemminckt, 60

torquata, 141, 150, 162
torqualus, 141
undulata, 133

vulgaris, 26

Bar-headed goose, 133
Barnacle goose, 171
Barred-headed goose, 133
Bean goose, 94, 110
Bernacle goose, 150

197

ruficollis, 141
Brent, 150-158
goose, 150
Brenta, 150
ruficollis, 141
Brenthus bernicla, 151

Car-lag, 94

Chen, 12
albatus, 13
canagica, 21
hyperborea, 13
hyperboreus, 12
hyperboreus nivalis, 18

198

Chen nivalis, 18
Chinese goose, 176
Chtonochen hyperboreus, 13
Chloéphaga canagica, 20
Clatter goose, 150
Common brant, 158
Crocker, 150
Cygnopsis, 176
cygnotides, 176, 177
cygnotdes australis, 177
1274$, 177
guineensts, 177
Cygnus davidt, 13
Simensts, 177

Eastern bean-goose, 123
Emperor goose, 20
Eulabeta, 133

пса, 133

2765, 133
Fulabta, 133
Eskimo goose, 20

Fish brant, 12
Flight goose, 166

Geadh-glas, 25

Greater snow-goose, 18
Grey brant, 42

Grey goose, 87, 94
Grey-lag, 24

Harlequin brant, 42
Harvest goose, 110
Hell-hounds, 171
flexanthemops, 13
Horie goose, 150

Geese of Europe

Horra goose, 150

Hutchins’s barnacle goose, 166
Hutchins’s Canada goose, 166
Hutchins’s goose, 166

Lamellirostris, 4
Large grey goose, 25
Large pink-footed goose, 78
Laughing goose, 42
Lesser Canada goose, 166
Lesser white-fronted goose, 59
Leucoblepharon, 166
canadensts, 2
hutchinst, 166
Leucopareia, 171
leucopsis, 171, 172
rujicollis, 141i
Light-bellied brent, 158
Little wild goose, 166

Marilochen brevirostris, 60
Melanonyx, 72

arvensis, 94

arvensis stbivicus, 104

brachyrhynchus, 87

carnetrostris, 120

mentalts, 130

neglectus, 78

segetum, 110

segetum serrtrostris, 123
Menshaga kazarka, 141
Mexican goose, 12
Middendorff’s goose, 104
Mud goose, 168

Novaia Zemlia bean-goose, 120

Painted goose, 20

Printed by В. & К. CLARK, LIMITED, Ldinburgh.

and Asia

Philacte, 20
canagica, 20
Pied brant, 42
Pink-footed bean-goose, 87
Pink-footed goose, 87
Prairie brant, 42
Prairie goose, 166
Ptocas ruficollis, 141

Quink goose, 150

Rat goose, 150

Red-billed grey-lag, 25

Red-breasted goose, 140

Red goose, 12

Road goose, 150

Rood goose, 150

ROSS? 13

Rott goose, 150

Rufibrenta, 140
ruficollis, 140

Texas goose, 12
Thick-billed goose, 130
Tortoise-shell goose, 42

Wae-Wae, 12

Ware goose, 150
Wavey, 12

Wevol, 12

Wexford bernacle, 171
White brand, 12

White brant, 12
White-fronted goose, 42
White-headed goose, 20

Yellow-billed bean-goose, 94
Yellow-legged goose, 42

А
cL}

г

Е On

ИРА
‘ ly
рента

“Bal as

ile

к ad eet hy
4 >

me

7

р ПЕ ‘snoiogieddy usyo “soda wrarggq

RaYOOW ‘5 и чаэазншАу HY ead чи

25005) MOUS

теории > aa :

вяхоои SNH ITOGOHMAW HH 551 чи.

ysemag feoSeues эра ‘yomorgg

‘9s00y Josoduq =

2
8
®
a
ра
3
Г

м

‘JT ‘лэзие лэзи\у ‘чоАт ичазо

PAYOOW SNH чаэ4эншАЯ НИ wel чи 5

a ‘seq Aary

О
‘4 м

Ne
р у

PUYOOW BHU ч.чэдэниАЯ HY val “LHC

ен ницы

оао чинят

‘doss ‘Зое josuy ‘eudveru Keqovorgg

‘95005 PoUOI-o}Y MA

i

SS SS

ee
Sar ae
<<

ete

“

at pale
ЗЕ

‘Iouunr) ‘зпопрлецтац Josuy ‘вячиАяи]]

"9S005) рэ}ч0-э)4 ЛА 1э$$Э/Т

“ey

PAYOOW ‘5 и чаэдэншАЯ HY вт Lay

‘TouUND) ‘5порлеилау Jasuy ‘вячиАязи[]

‘э5009) рэзчод-э МА 19559]

мы | = ‘uryyosns ‘snyoopsou xAuourjayy “941 игчииф д | | |

и PATYOOW ‘и чаэздентиля HY aL ; a
bed el ЯНИ eed tHe a ee 95007) UtId S$ ,Ubyysnsg

‘
2 `

Ne

f

CHYOOW 64MuateedenmAW НИ of LHI

“>

$12944 42е14 xAuourpy “AI WIOHOMLOdO y `

95005) рэз00;-ша

>

Ridges

iy

3 “the ate

Е

0224 ‘sisusate xAuourpy “IAI иояэго]] |

BYYOOW ‘Я ичазЧентаАУ HY sal Зиг ‘ *9500г) ТеэЯ рэ=а-моПэл

иены НАУ
ту
м И

в

aes
Poh es
aaa

\

м ay” ES
Seoticrnennnshit,

к

Nae

“ee

ue

an

euUyOOW ‘о Ччичаэданяиу HY ва ти

‘ЧАТУ ‘пота sisusare xAuourpy ‘ФиннэиАт иошчгоч

"9S8005) SJjJOpusppipy

anne

y
¥
Зы

‘ i 7

JUD ‘wNjesos хАНОЧЕЭИ “GAT изннаше]

BayOoW ом ичаэЧэншАЯ НИ ead чи
‘э5005) Urag

BAYOOW о ичаэдэншАЯ HY sad и

z
7’ be
=
se
=

a
ae

„вен

t
i Я г . ig - д мы * Bad bi z
| STATIN - к SSS.

вЯэои GNU LaodeHMAYW НИ ев т чи

$50

‘Цеуиэи xAuouepayy `92Ал ичловаони

Е

ет ‘еотриг viaqeng ‘чоАл ичн9до ]

"95005 рэртэч-рэмеа о

PAaYOOW 6HH ч.чэ4дэниУ HY cal зи

el

$
ав

i
р

Nem,
Heady,
у fo

i

mused
Зак

МЕЛ

eayoow ANH asodenmAY НИ eed иг

Теа ‘sijjooyns vyuoiqyny ‘eudeceu веоовоное

‘9S005) Po}Sko1q-pey

>

et

eee

ровен

Е

“T ‘epiuiaq vjueig ‘eudeeem кендэр

О SMU aeOdenTIAW HY fal чи 3 | | "9$00г) 1992Я

пе

ое авы макак
о зе HA

1%
ah Ayan

ta у
4 ap

вяуоои си чяэЧэнщАУЯНИ eal чи

‘Wig ‘1235е30опеа вримэд вулела ‘еЧеЕех wexaidgoriga)

uosg рэе9-Ч871

mea

ae

a

‘А\еТ ‘зивом8 вртизэд вуиела ‘eudeeeN кехооонаэТ,

eHyoow OMUAeOdsHMAY HY 21 ик

. пиве

и ян

\ ; у ОЕ : иерей SUSE

у

енуоои ‘$ ичнодэнт АУ HY ey зи

я

рт чеируйч uoreydajqoona7] ‘вя4веея weren квяоиенеУ

‘95005) s,suTyony

eat

pena eat

9529 ‘sisdoonay етоле4о2пэ’] ‘вя4вЕвхя wenomorggq

VSYOOW Би чаэЧченшАУ HY ет чик

i | ‘э500=) Э[овилеЯ

Aen

ee heen. |

ny

Бул

PXYOOW GHH LaodeHuMAW НИ ват аи

подарен

eer eee Se ИЕ ЖЕ Зы. ee ee eee ee ee eee eee

sy

yy

Мы

А

она

нь

“JT ‘saprousdd sisdousd> ‘язонохАЭ

‘9S005-UPMS

STEAM ху жел,

= ee Ee
Pee eo

здизои ъуичачедэнмАу HY eal ии

-вотбеиео э9е1ча "зпоодеииц IOSUY

‘зори: Blaqeing

- ‘snaioqieddy чэчо

а И

Rope Sprit
NRE ae "ак. РО

GG

PHyOOW ‘5 ичаязаэншлу НИ eal чии

"51911915 SISUDAIe 119 | р "5113504495 1119695 ‘oI

eS . *wuinjebas э/
"SISUDAIG °[9 _ "sl[eyUSW WinjoHes “joy

Sci alleen irons

SG | |

BUYOOW GHHTHOdeHMAY HY sal чи

Зи ‘one7y

А A

> питере г

-.

ИЕ"

aH НАУКУ ! НН
Г” У

*snyouAysAyoesq ‘19

ты

.
eg
sony

ео

———щЩ

чения

ЗА

= ]
=

РЕКЕ ЕН i ii ы

iii

И

;

Se oa ne ney