THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN OTHER BOOKS ON GARDENS MOSTLY CONTAINING ILLUSTRATIONS IN COLOUR THE CHARM OF GARDENS By Dion CLayton CALTHROP. 32 full-page Illustrations in Colour by BEATRICE Parsons and others. THE GARDENS OF ENGLAND By E. T. Coox. 16 full-page Illustrations in Colour by BEATRICE PARSONS. PLANT LIFE By Rev. Cuarves A. HALL. 0 full- -page Illustrations in Colour by NEWALL, and 24 page Illus- trations from photographs. THE CALL OF THE OPEN A Nature ANTHOLOGY. Selected and Edited by LEonarp H. STOWELL. 16 full-page Illustrations in Colour. GARDENS IN THEIR SEASONS | By C. von Wyss. 32 Illustrations in Colour and 32 in Black and White. THE CHILDREN’S BOOK OF GARDENING By Mrs. A. SipGwick and Mrs. PAYNTER. 8 full-page Illustrations in Colour by Mrs. CAYLEY-ROBINSON. GARDENS OF THE GREAT MUGHALS By Mrs, C. M. ViLiiers STUART. 40 page Illustrations (16 in Colour), also 8 Ground Plans. BLACK’S GARDENING DICTIONARY Edited by E. T. Exuis, F.R.H.S. With Contributions by the leading Gardening Experts and Specialists of to-day. THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE GARDEN (In the ‘‘ Peeps at Nature” Series.) By PERCIVAL WESTELL. 16 full-page Illustrations, 8 being in Colour. A. AND C. BLACK, LTD., 4, 5 & 6 SOHO SQUARE, LONDON, W. I AGENTS THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 64 & 66 FIFTH AVENUR, NEW YORK OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 205 FLINDERS LANE, MELBOURNE BMERICR 5 i 6 tis AUSTRALASIA CANADA sss 0-0 « INDIA . .e ce eo THE MACMILLAN COMPANY OF CANADA, LTD. ST. MARTIN’S HOUSE, 70 BOND STREET, TORONTO MACMILLAN & COMPANY, LTD. MACMILLAN BUILDING, BOMBAY 309 BOW BAZAAR STREET, CALCUTTA INDIAN BANK BUILDINGS, MADRAS oe a bee « ‘2 ay at ag Ak a eee Mires vic. fy bis pe = at Z < Y) ea) — O PE tee GLORY OF THE GARDEN By M. G. KENNEDY-BELL 4 “ B.R.ES. “In my garden I spend my days; in my library I spend my nights, My interests are divided between my geraniums and my books. With the flower I am in the present ; with the book I am in the past.” ALEXANDER SMITH, A&C, BLACK “LTD: 4, § & 6 SOHO SQUARE, LONDON, W.1 1923 CHAPTER I. Il. Contents THE HISTORY OF GARDENING - PLANT BREEDING, IN ITS RELATION GARDENING - - - A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A PLANT HERBS AND THEIR ORIGIN - THE PATRON SAINTS OF GARDENING SOME BEE LORE - - SOME BIRD LORE - - SOME TREE LORE - SOME WEATHER LORE - - THE MOON AND PLANT GROWTH MAGICAL PLANTS - - WITCHES AND THEIR FLOWER LORE THE DEVIL’S PLANTS’ - - FAIRIES AND THEIR FLOWER LORE OUR LADY’S FLOWERS - - FLOWERS OF THE SAINTS - TO FLOWER LEGENDS OF “* SAINTLY FAME ”’ LEGENDS OF NATIONAL FLOWERS LEGENDS OF MYTHOLOGICAL FAME LEGENDS OF FIR AND PINE TREES PAGE THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN CHAPTER I THE HISTORY OF GARDENING “ As gardening has been the inclination of Kings and the choice of Philosophers, so it has been the common favourite of public and private men; a pleasure of the greatest, and a care of the meanest; and, indeed, an employment and possession for which no man is too high or too low.”—S1r Wo. TEmpte. Tue art and craft of gardening is undoubtedly the oldest of all human occupations, and in the long ages of time that have passed since the first gardener, our forefather Adam, practised the art, first for pleasure, and afterwards as a means of subsistence, gardening has never failed to have a magic fascina- tion for the rich and poor of all nations. Noah, we are told, was very proficient in the cultivation of the Vine; Jacob in growing Vines, Figs, and Almonds; Solomon in making gardens, orchards, and vineyards. The ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, Chinese, Greeks, and Romans seem to have been experts in the fashioning of gardens and the cultivation of fruits and vegetables. The gardens of that early period were enclosed by walls or thick hedges to protect the crops from prowling animals, and the chief crops grown seem to have been the Vine, Fig, Pomegranate, Walnut, I 2 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN Almond, Medlar, and Quince. Also Lettuce, Cu- cumber, Melons, Onions, Leeks, and Garlic galore. In the hot, dry climate of Palestine, watering was an indispensable operation, and so reservoirs for irrigating the land had always to be provided. In ancient Persia and Assyria, gardens were fashioned and maintained on a very large scale near all the large cities. The famous Hanging Gardens of Babylon were the great wonder of all the world. They consisted of twenty plateaux rising one above the other, and resting on walls 22 feet in thickness, and each planted with trees, or other vegetation, kept in constant growth by artificial watering. In Egypt also the gardens were very elaborately fashioned, much sculpture and masonry entering into their formation; and in these gardens they grew many kinds of fruit, all of which had to be constantly watered by means of irrigation from the Nile. The Greeks were very famous gardeners, and they seem to have taken special delight in having fine expanses of beautifully-kept grass; fruit trees were much cultivated, and the favourite flowers would seem to have bean Roses, Lilies, and Narcissi. The Romans were most keen gardeners, and grew many of the popular vegetables of the present day with great success. Also, they understood fully the art of manuring and forcing, and they may be said to have brought horticulture and agriculture to their highest perfection at that period of the world’s history. So far as our own country is concerned, there can be little doubt that we owe the early intro- duction of horticulture to the Romans. THE HISTORY OF GARDENING 3 When they had finally subjugated the ancient Britons and peace prevailed, history tells us that the Roman settlers planted vineyards and orchards of apples, pears, figs, and mulberries; also they grew corn extensively for home use and for export. In the twelfth century it is recorded that vineyards flourished in the Vale of Gloucester, apple orchards were plentiful in the fertile district of Worcester, and market gardens existed at Fulham. These were simple patches or enclosures, within walls, planted with fruits, vegetables, and herbs. The Monks of the Middle Ages were the real pioneers of gardening, and it is to their skill and knowledge that we owe much. Their superior education and general habits made it possible for them to bring skilled method into the work, and gardening as an “ art” may be rightly said to date from the monastery gardens. Also, the monks were naturally in the habit of travelling a good deal, and so had the chance of seeing new plants cultivated in other countries, which they could secure and grow in their own gardens. In the reign of Edward III. the art of gardening began to be taken seriously in hand. Gardens were laid out on a more ornamental scale, and plants for medicinal purposes were cultivated extensively. The first book on gardening—‘‘ De Yconomia de Housbrandia,” by Walter de Henley—appeared in the sixteenth century, and others soon followed, including that of Thomas Tusser, who detailed the work of the garden and farm in quaint and curious rhyme. 4 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN In Henry VIII.’s reign the gardens of Nonsuch and Hampton Court were laid out with regal splendour, and in Elizabeth’s time the Potato, Tomato, Tea, and many other useful and orna- mental trees and plants were introduced from foreign countries. Evelyn, a great writer and traveller, did much to extend and popularise the practice of gardening. Gerarde, the famous surgeon and botanist, lived at this time, and published his excellent ‘‘ Herbal,” a work still valued very highly, and full of sound information. ‘John Parkinson, a little later, pub- lished ‘‘ Paradise in Sole Paradisus Terrestris,” a work which gave a great impetus to gardening. In the eighteenth century much progress was made, and people of wealth began to lay out gardens on a magnificent scale, and form parks, and plant trees for ornament and use. Botanical gardens were formed at Chelsea, Cam- bridge, and Kew, and greenhouses, glazed with glass and artificially heated, were first brought into practical use. It seems from records, though, that the professional gardener of that period was much lacking in skill and intelligence; he could cultivate the ordinary crops, but failed hopelessly in the art of growing the choicer vegetables and fruit, and so these had to be imported from Belgium and Holland. The Chelsea Physic Garden was founded by the “Society of Apothecaries of London,” which society was incorporated by Royal Charter in 1606, and was then united with the Grocers’ Company, an ancient City guild. An interesting record of the Chelsea Physic Garden in 1685 is given to us by John Evelyn: THE HISTORY OF GARDENING 5 “7th August.—I went to see Mr. Watts, keeper of the Apothecaries’ garden of simples at Chelsea, where there is a collection of innumerable rarities of that sort particularly, besides many annuals, the tree bearing jesuits’ bark, which had done such wonders in quartan agues. What was very ingenious was the subterranean heat, conveyed by a stove under the conservatory, which was all vaulted with brick, so as he has the doors and windows open in the hardest frosts, secluding only the snow.” The Chelsea garden was framed, in the main, on the pattern of the herbalists’ gardens, and one of the principal aims of its founders was the arrange- ment of plants in a systematic manner, that 1s, according to their families. At the close of the seventeenth century, the plants were arranged according to the systems of Ray and Tournefort, and in practice this scheme is still partially carried out, inasmuch, as trees and shrubs are generally grouped apart from herbaceous plants, for matters of convenience. Towards the end of the eighteenth century, the Linnean classification gradually supplanted the systems of Ray and Tournefort, and this was again superseded by Decandolle and Lindley about the middle of the nineteenth century. Since the re- organisation of the garden in 1902, the sequence of the natural orders for the herbaceous plants is that of Bentham and Hooker’s “ Genera Plantarum.” From 1836 to 1853, the fame of the Chelsea garden was at its zenith, largely owing to the great activity of John Lindley, who occupied the chair of Professor of Botany and Prefectus Horti during that period. But in 1853 the Society found it 6 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN was seriously hampered by the expenses involved in this work, and they decided to relieve the strain by working the garden more economically. The lectures were discontinued, the office of Prefectus Horti was abolished, and the cultivation of plants requiring artificial heat was abandoned. ‘The garden was saved from total oblivion during this period by its curator, Thomas Moore, who had been elected to the post in 1848, on the recom- mendation of Lindley. Thomas Moore was co-editor of “The Treasury of Botany” with Lindley, a work which has made the name of the Chelsea garden famous throughout the world. The rdle of the garden is still chiefly an educa- tional one; specimens of living plants are supplied to a number of colleges and schools, and the labora- tory is used for physiological work by the students of the Royal College of Science. The present Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew are the result of the fusion of two Royal domains—(1) Rich- mond Gardens, and (2) the original Kew Gardens, the latter corresponding roughly to the private grounds of Kew House, a substantial private house, which was demolished in 1803. ‘This fusion, con- templated by an Act of Parliament, and giving George III. power to cause the lane separating the two gardens “ to be shut up and discontinued,” was finally completed in 1802. In 1823, George IV. acquired the western portion of Kew Green, including an old road which led there from Brentford Ferry. By this means part of the present herbarium, and the whole of its site, the old Kew Gardens, the former Richmond Gardens, became a single Royal domain; and this THE HISTORY OF GARDENING 7 fusion proved, incidentally, to be the first step towards the opening up of Kew to the public. The three chief objects which Kew has aimed at from the outset are: 1. To make of Kew Gardens a pleasure-ground which would stimulate the interest of the general public in the vegetable kingdom and its products. 2. To encourage and render assistance to scientific botanists, travellers, merchants, and manufacturers. 3. To train plant collectors and gardeners for home, colonial, and foreign service. The Kew training is very thorough, consisting of practical work and lectures, with the added benefit that the student has of becoming familiar with Kew’s marvellous collection of plants. The lectures comprise a course in physics and chemistry as applied to botany and geology; an- other in general botany; a third on economic plants and their products; and a fourth on geo- graphical botany. During his stay at Kew the young gardener has to collect, mount, and name a herbarium of 250 specimens himself, and at the end of two years he is granted a Kew certificate, provided his work has been satisfactory. So from this brief summary it can quite easily be seen that it is during the last century that gardening in all its branches made such a great advance, due to the efforts of many eminent experts, such as Thomas Andrew Knight, who did so much in the improvement of the varieties of hardy fruit; Sir Joseph Paxton, the talented gardener, and designer of the gardens at Chatsworth and the Crystal Palace; Charles Darwin, who rendered such vast service to botany and the improvement 8 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN of plants by his researches and studies as to the origin of species; to say nothing of Mendel, whose discoveries went far to revolutionise our knowledge of genetic science and heredity. Dar- win’s achievement so far exceeded anything that had been thought possible before, that what should have been but a beginning, was hailed as the com- pleted work. Professor Bateson, in his book on ‘* Mendel’s Principles of Heredity,” says: “‘ Had Mendel’s work come into the hands of Darwin, it is not too much to say that the history of the development of evolutionary philosophy would have been very different from that which we have witnessed.” “God Almighty first planted a garden. And, indeed, it is the purest of human pleasures; it is the greatest refreshment to the spirit of man, without which buildings and palaces are but gross handi- works. And a man shall ever see that when ages grow to civility and elegance, men come to build stately, sooner than to garden finely, as if gardening were the greater perfection. I do hold it in the royal ordering of gardens, there ought to be gardens for all the months in the year, in which severally things of beauty may be then in season.” Francis Bacon (Lorp VERULAM). CHAPTER II PLANT BREEDING, IN ITS RELATION TO GARDENING “Evolution ever climbing after some ideal good, And Reversion ever dragging evolution in the mud.” TENNYSON, Amonc the biological sciences, the study of heredity must necessarily occupy a central position, and although as gardeners we are not directly concerned with the application of science, we must never- theless perceive that in no branch of knowledge is research more likely to increase our power over nature. Whilst the experimental “ study of the species ” problem was in great activity, the Darwinian writings appeared. Evolution, from being an un- supported problem, was shown to be plainly de- ducible from ordinary experience, and the reality of the process was no longer doubted. But Mendel, and his working out of the Mendelian principles, has carried us far beyond the beginning that Darwin made. Darwin indeed paved the way, and, as it were, laid the foundation stones, but to Mendel was given the golden key which should unlock the door into the mysteries of the laws governing the study of plant breeding and genetics. History of Mendel—Mendel was born in 1822, in the “ Kuhland ” district of Austrian Silesia. 9 10 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN It is recorded of his father that he took special interest in fruit culture, and initiated his son at an early age into the mysteries of grafting. Gregor Mendel attended a government school in the village, where his talent was soon obvious. The result of this was that, when he was only eleven years old, he was sent to Leipzig, and here he distinguished himself so much that he was sent on to Troppau, although the parental resources were rather severely taxed by this effort. At Troppau one of the instructors was an Augustinian, and possibly his description of the scholarly quiet of the cloisters may have turned Mendel’s thoughts in this direction. For very shortly he became a candidate for admission to the Augustinian house of St. Thomas in Brinn. He was admitted to the monastery, and elected with a view to his taking part in the educational work; in 1847 he was ordained priest. At the expense of the cloister he was sent in 1851 to the University of Vienna, where he remained till 1853, studying mathematics, physics, and natural science. On returning to Briinn he became a teacher, and he appears to have taken great pleasure in this work, and to have been quite extraordinarily suc- cessful in instructing, and also interesting, his pupils. In 1868 he was elected Abbot, or Pralat, of the monastery. ‘The experiments which have made his name famous throughout the world were carried out in the large garden belonging to the monastery. With the views of Darwin, which at that time were coming into prominence, Mendel did not find himself in full agreement, and he embarked on his experiments with Peas, which he continued for PLANT BREEDING II eight years. His largest undertaking, besides the work on Pisum, was an investigation on the heredity of Bees. He had fifty hives under observation, but the notes which he is known to have made on these experiments can nowhere be found, and it is now feared that they must have been destroyed, possibly inadvertently. The types of the great discoverers are most varied. ‘The wild, uncertain, rapid flash of genius, the scattered, half-focussed daylight of generalisa- tion, and the steady, slowly-perfected ray of pene- trative analysis, are all lights in which truth may be seen. Mendel’s faculty was of the latter order. From the fragmentary records of him in his biography we can form a fairly true idea of the man, with his clear head, strong interest in practical affairs, obstinate determination, and power of pursuing an abstract idea. The total neglect of his work during his lifetime is known to have been a serious disappointment to him. He is reported constantly to have said: “ Meine Zeit wird schon kommen ” (My time will surely come). Mendelian Theories—The case which illustrates Mendel’s methods in the simplest way is that in which heredity in respect of height was studied. Mendel took a pair of Sweet Peas, of which one was tall (6 to 7 feet), and the other dwarf (9 to 18 inches). ‘These two were then crossed together. The cross-bred seeds thus produced grew into plants which were always all, having a height not sensibly different from that of the pure tall variety from which the cross was made. In Mendelian terms, this first, cross-bred, filial generation is 12 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN called F,. From the fact that the character tallness appears in the cross-bred, to the exclusion of the opposite character, Mendel called it a dominant character; dwarfness, which disappears in the F, plant, he called recessive. The tall cross-bred was then allowed to bear seeds by self-fertilisation, and these are the next generation, F,. When grown up they prove to be mixed, many being tall, and some being short, like their grandparents. Upon counting the numbers of this F, generation, it was discovered that the proportion of talls to shorts showed a certain constancy, averaging about 3 talls to 1 short, or 75 per cent. dominants to 25 per cent. recessives. These F, plants were again allowed to fertilise themselves, and the offspring of each plant was separately sown. It was then found that the off- spring F; of the recessives consisted entirely of recessives, and further generations bred from these recessives again produced only recessives, therefore they are proved to be true to the recessive character of dwarfness. But the tall I’, dominants, when tested by a study of their offspring (I’3), instead of being all alike, as were the dwarfs or recessives, prove to be of two kinds, viz.: (1) Plants which give a mixed F;, consisting of both talls and dwarfs, the proportion showing again an average of 3 talls to 1 dwarf. (2) Plants which give talls only, and are thus pure to tallness. The ratio of the first to the second was as 2 to I. In his original paper on plant breeding, Mendel states that at the very outset he paid special atten- tion to the family Leguminosae, on account of their PLANT BREEDING 13 peculiar floral structure, and of this family the genus Pisum were found to possess in the best manner the necessary qualifications. It is very unlikely that a disturbance through foreign pollen can occur in these flowers, as the fertilising organs are closely packed inside the keel, and the anther bursts within the bud, so that the stigma becomes covered with pollen before ever the flower is open. Artificial fertilisation becomes, therefore, rather an elaborate process, but it nearly always succeeds. To perform the operation, the bud should be opened before it is properly developed, the keel is removed, and each stamen carefully extracted by means of a pair of forceps, after which the stigma can at once be dusted over with the foreign ollen. The Mendelian discoveries have made matters very much easier for gardeners and florists in the work of plant breeding and fixing new varieties, as, according to Mendel’s law, after three flowerings, the variety should be “ fixed,” whereas in the old, rather muddled way of doing things it often took double, and even treble that time, to fix a variety with any hope of it remaining constant. If, after three flowerings, dominants only are produced, then the plant is pure; but if both dominants and recessives, then it is hybrid. Among plants there are many hybrid instances, notably some pedigree strains of Primula sinensis, raised by Suttons. One is a large-flowered type, known as “‘ Giant Lavender,” having a pale magenta flower. This never comes true from seed, throwing always a number of bright magenta reds and a corre- 14. THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN sponding number of whites, more or less tinged with magenta, which evidently exhibit the two gametic elements that must be combined in one zygote in order to produce the lavender. In this case, the bright magenta reds immediately breed true when self-fertilised. There is another colour in Primula sinensis which apparently cannot exist in a pure form. This is a peculiar shade of “ crushed strawberry,” and the two pure forms by the union of which it is formed are the deep crimson of “‘ Crimson King” and the white with a bright pink eye, brought out by Suttons under the name of “ Duchess.” By crossing these two together, the peculiar hetero- zygous colour can at once be produced. One of the most striking instances of hybrid characters in the animal world may be seen in the case of the Andalusian fowl. ‘The blue Andalusian fowl owes its popularity with the public, and its interest to the student of heredity, to its colour, which is a slaty blue-grey. If two birds of this strain are mated, it will be found that they do not breed true. In every four birds on the average, three types of colour are produced: two blue, one black, and one white. The blacks are found to breed true to their colour and so are the whites, and the blue Andalusians, when mated together, again produce these three types in the same proportions. From this it would seem pretty obvious that the blue Andalusian is a hybrid, and as such can never be fixed. But cross one of these black birds with a white and the result is a blue Andalusian, and blue birds obtained in this way produce a generation of PLANT BREEDING 15 fowls consisting of about one black, two blues, and one white in every four. But though these examples of unfixable hybrids are not rare, they are in a minority, and, speaking generally, we can be fairly certain that a given type can be made to breed true, and to perpetuate its good qualities indefinitely. From Mendelian discovery the practical plant breeder learns two lessons: Firstly, that he must not discard the F, genera- tion, simply because it does not give him what he wants. It may be quite uninteresting from the horticultural point of view, exhibiting some old- fashioned or reversionary type, which is reproduced because all the factors which constitute it, happen to have been brought together in one individual. But from the appearance of this first generation no guess can be made as to the properties of F, (the second generation). A great deal of valuable material has often been discarded by practical horticulturists, simply through ignorance of the Mendelian principles. The uninteresting types produced through crossing, though no improvement on the old and familiar varieties, would, if their seed had been saved, probably have given many novelties in the next generation. Secondly, and this practical lesson is, if anything, more important: each individual plant must be bred from separately. For the Mendelian dis- covery does away with the old delusion that time and continued selection are needed in order to make a variety breed true. Purity of type depends on the meeting of two gametes bearing similar factors, and when two similarly-constituted gametes 16 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN do thus meet in fertilisation, the product of their union is pure, thus showing that the belief, held for so long, that purity of type depends on continued selection has no physiological foundation. For the homozygous individuals, which are the only ones that will breed true, may appear in Fy. It is the business of the breeder to find these individuals, and by continued selection, he may perhaps succeed in the end, for at each selection he increases his chance of finding them; but by following the Mendelian method he can go straight to the point, and thus, very probably, save himself many years’ work. TrecHNICAL MeEtuHops. The actual work of crossing plants together is quite simple, but at the same time it demands much patience and concentration. In the first place, the anthers of the plant to be used as a female must be picked out carefully with forceps before they are ripe. The flower is then covered to exclude insect visitors. Muslin bags may be used for this purpose, but they are not so safe as rainproof bags made of parchment paper. The bag is put over the flower, the mouth being crushed up so as to fit the stem, and it is fixed in place with a thin piece of copper wire. Bees will often visit flowers covered over with muslin, and it is difficult to prevent this. The flower from which pollen is to be taken must also be covered before it opens, in order to keep its pollen pure and unadulterated. The old-fashioned method of using a brush for the transference of the pollen is not advisable; it is PLANT BREEDING 17 very difficult to be certain that the brush is quite free from all foreign bodies. The best plan is to pick out with fine forceps an anther from the flower to be used as the male, and with it to touch the stigma of the female flower. The fingers and forceps should be continually cleansed with spirit, in order to kill any pollen grains that may adhere to them. By not paying strict attention to these little details, it is so very easy to spoil the results of several months of careful and laborious work. ** Nature, which governs . whole, will soon change all things which thou seest, and out of their substance will make other things, and again other things from the substance of them, in order that the world may be ever new.”—Marcus AvreLius. CHAPTER III A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A PLANT ‘“< Wherever flowers cannot be reared, there man cannot live.” — Napoteon I. How many people, even among those who care for their gardens and flowers, really take the trouble to enquire into the actual “ inner workings ”’ of the plant? By the great majority of people Botany is looked upon as a “‘ dry-as-dust ”’ subject, just a long list of classifications, Latin names of the families and natural orders, and so on. ‘This is largely due to the wrong method of teaching Botany in the past; it is surely a great mistake to begin at that uninteresting end of the subject. The classifications are most necessary, but, of course, they are wearisome to the child or student (as the case may be) who knows nothing at all of the wonderful workings of the plant. “Botany is the science which endeavours to answer every reasonable question about plants”: begin your instructions at that end, explaining something about the physiology and work of the plants generally. ‘Then this “ dry-as-dust ” subject will seem like a wondrous fairy-tale, as mysterious, even in these matter-of-fact days, as were any of the “ Arabian Nights ” stories. The Root had better be our first consideration; and the office and work of the main root is to support 18 A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A PLANT 19 the plant firmly in the ground, and to convey the food collected by the root hairs up to the stem and leaves. ‘The extreme tips of all the roots are pro- vided with a cap, formed of a mass of dead and dying cells, and the meaning of this cap is to protect the tender point of the root as it forces its way through the soil. It is highly important for the gardener to know and realise that it is not the large, woody roots that absorb food from the soil, but the fine root hairs. For instance, if a gardener plants a rose, or a fruit tree, with only a few large roots, such a plant or tree cannot get any nourishment from the soil, until it has had time to make new root hairs to collect the food; therefore, until this has happened, the tree is in great danger of starving and dying. The root hairs emit a dissolving fluid which pre- pares the food for absorption, and it is only when there are plenty of healthy root hairs, able to carry out this function, that plants can obtain their food from the soil. This is the reason for being so very careful, in moving plants, always to transplant with a good ball of soil, then the root hairs are less likely to be injured, and there 1s much less check to the tree. The raw food, absorbed by the roots, is conveyed through the wood fibre and vessels of the stem, right up to the leaves, where, under the action of sunlight, it is manufactured into the finished material, which is then again conducted back through the sieve tubes of the stem to form new tissues, new shoots, and new roots. The proto- plasm of the cells acts as a kind of magnet, drawing the liquid food from cell to cell as it is required. 20 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN The pressure of the ascending sap is often very great. When active growth begins the cells be- come charged with liquid, and the pressure of one turgid cell on another forces the sap onwards. The best example of this force of ascending sap can be seen in the case of a bleeding vine. If the pruning of the vine is delayed until too late in the spring, moisture will ooze out freely from the cut surface of the stem, and the vine is then said to ‘‘ bleed.” Naturally, this weakens the future growth of the vine very considerably, as, the cells having been cut through, the sap escapes easily, the quantity increas- ing as time goes on. The Work of the Stem—This may be described principally as ‘‘ transport work.” ‘The stem con- veys, by means of its vascular bundles and tissues, food to the branches and leaves. And it reconveys the elaborated food to those parts of the plant that need to be increased in size. There is a continuous and definite system of flow and return of food-stuffs always going on in the stem, and specialised cells are concerned in that work. Stems vary, of course, according to the species of plant under consideration; some are of annual duration only, and others live for an indefinite period. In the first case, the structure is of less permanent or woody a nature than in that of the second. But in all stems, whether of trees or of annual plants, there is this transport work going on, a definite conveyance of food-stuffs backwards and forwards. The Work of the Leaves.—These may be described as the workshops of the plant, wherein all the raw A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A PLANT 21 material collected by the roots from the soil and air, are manufactured into the finished products required for building up the structure of the plant. The green colouring matter in the leaf consists of chlorophyll grains, and these grains are capable of moving about at will in the cells; thus, in dark- ness, they range themselves round the wall of the cell, and in dull weather round three sides of the cell only. The under surfaces of the leaf are furnished with breathing pores, called stomata. As many as 100,000 of these pores occur on every square inch of leaf surface; they permit of the transpiration of superfluous moisture, and of the absorption of carbon dioxide gas (CQ,). They really act as safety valves to the cells, opening when there is a superabundance of water, and closing again when there is a shortage of mois- ture, so as to prevent the cells being emptied of their contents. Some plants have their epidermis, or outer skin, covered with hairs, and these hairs have a special office to perform. On cold, windy days, or in very dry weather, they lie close over the stomata, to prevent transpiration, and also to keep a layer of warm air over the epidermis. The health of the plant depends largely on the working of these stomata, and that is one reason why plants in towns and cities often fail to thrive, because the stomata become choked with soot and dust. ‘This should show us a very practical applica- tion to gardening, pointing out how very necessary it is to keep the leaves clean and healthy, that they may breathe properly, and carry on without 22 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN hindrance the wonderful work of food manu- facture. The daily work and routine of this green part of the plant is one of the most interesting phenomena in nature, and yet by the greater number of people, one of the least-thought-of facts. It is, of course, a commonplace piece of knowledge that plants do exactly the opposite thing to the atmosphere, to that done by human beings and animals—viz., they purify the air during the daytime by breathing out pure oxygen and taking in the carbon dioxide from the surrounding air. This gas, whose chemical formula is CO,, is at once seized upon by the chloro- phyll grains, or chloroplasts (the green colouring matter of the plant), and “ assimilated.” After entering into the cells of the leaf, the CO,, together with a certain amount of water, undergoes a chemical change, which results in the formation of a soluble carbohydrate. The word Carbohydrate simply means a substance composed of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Starch and sugar are carbohydrates, and the first to be formed after this “‘ carbon-fixation” is sugar, probably cane sugar, which is in soluble form, and in this form the leaves send it along by special cells and vessels down to the stem and roots. The next process that this sugar undergoes is to be converted into starch grains, which latter, being solid, are more easily compressed into a small space. Normally, the night-time storage form is sugar, and each morning, directly it is light, the proto- plasm seizes on the sugar, elaborates it, and once more converts it into starch for the daytime storage form. A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A PLANT 23 There are still a few old-fashioned countryfolk who believe in always cutting their cabbages and lettuces either last thing at night or else at dawn in the very early morning. They will tell you that they are more crisp and tender before the sun is on them. This is quite true, and it is a fact that they are also sweeter, and when the physiology of the plant is studied then light breaks in, and a reason dawns for what would otherwise appear to be mere superstition. We turn the light of science on these *‘ old-wives’ fables’ and smile no longer, for we find that in spite of some superstition and legendary magic, much of the solid gold of truth remains. This work of seizing upon a raw gas and con- verting it into food can only be performed by plants; no part of an animal or human being can perform these functions; it is a special prerogative of plant life. Day and night there is slips some useful work going on in some part of the plant, with never a complaint, all done silently and quickly, with no words, no fuss, and no bother. During the night-time the green part of the plant performs an exactly opposite process to that of the day. During the day it breathes out oxygen and takes in CO,, but at night-time this process is reversed, and the plant breathes after the manner of human beings, taking in oxygen and giving out Ci.. Therefore, on account of this, some people say, and firmly believe, that it is most unhealthy to sleep with a plant or flowers in one’s room. But as it would take pretty well a whole conservatory of 24 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN plants to breathe out as much CO, as is emitted by one human being, surely a few plants or flowers are not such dangerous room-mates as one human being ! Scientists tell us that, if it were not for the fact of plants purifying the atmosphere by breathing in the poisonous CO, and giving out fresh oxygen, the earth would soon be quite uninhabitable; we should have such a superabundance of impure gases hanging on the air unused, and to us un- usable without the aid of plants, that we should shortly be poisoned with these gases, and the earth would become a dead planet. The Fall of the Leaf—tIn very hot countries trees retain most of their leaves all the year round; a leaf falls occasionally, but no considerable portion of them drop at any one time. This holds good with regard to our own pine, fir, and spruce trees. The impossibility of absorbing moisture from the soil when the ground is very cold and near freezing- point would cause the death by drying up of trees with broad leaf surfaces. Also, in countries where there is much snow, most large-leaved trees could not escape injury to their branches from over- loading with snow. For these reasons most of our forest trees are deciduous—that is, they shed their leaves at the approach of winter, and the tree remains in a dormant condition. In the autumn the green pigment in the leaf breaks up, leaving behind yellow granules, and these produce the autumn colour. This brilliant coloura- tion of autumn leaves is often quite wrongly sup- posed to be due to the action of frost. But it depends merely on the changes in the A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A PLANT 25 ‘chlorophyll grains and the liquid cell contents. This is what happens in the autumn: When the green pigment or colouring matter breaks up and leaves behind the yellow granules, then many of the materials in the leaf, including starch, gradually recede along the leaf-stalks into the twigs, and here they stay, and are ready for use in the following spring. But in the oak and beech this process does not go on so extensively as in most other trees; the food materials do not recede from the leaves before they fall, and that is why their leaves are so much richer and more valuable as fertilisers. Gardeners always prefer leaf soil which is com- posed of oak and beech leaves in preference to that of any other tree, as experience shows them that these leaves give the best results. All these instances should show very clearly the need there is for a close union between horticulture and botany. Every gardener should be something of a botanist, and try to learn a little of the structure, anatomy, and physiology of the plant; otherwise he is working in the dark, and cannot feel the same interest in all the little details of ordinary, every- day gardening. One is continually coming across little gems of scientific knowledge that help very materially in the cultivation of plants and their successful treatment. There is any amount of 1esearch work waiting to be done in the gardening world, and plenty of unexplored fields await our efforts, in the raising of new varieties and improving existing ones, both in the fruit and vegetable kingdom, to say nothing of the flowers. 26 ‘THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN Then there is much work still to be done in the eradication of fungoid and insect pests that attack our crops—perfection is very far distant in that direction. Let us get away from that antiquated idea that to take up gardening means to give up all brain work. We want to get beyond the famous “Punch” caricature of a gardener—a dreary- looking creature, clay pipe in his mouth, corduroy trousers tied below the knee with a bit of string, and a face devoid of any intelligence, because, it was said: ‘‘ Any fool can work on the land.” Let us rather take as our motto Maartens’ famous saying: “ Gardeners have rare opportunities of thinking, Watching how queer things grow.” CHAPTER IV HERBS AND THEIR ORIGIN “*Excellent Herbs had our fathers of old, Excellent Herbs to ease their pain; Alexanders and Marigolds, Eyebright, Orris and Elecampane, Basil, Rocket, Valerian, Rue (Almost singing themselves they run), Vervain, Dittany, Call-me-to-you, Cowslip, Melilot, Rose-of-the-sun ; Anything green that grew out of the mould Was an excellent Herb to our fathers of old.” Rupyarp Kip.inc. In gardening, almost more than in any other art or craft, the past and the present are linked together, and although people in these days are much amused at the old superstitions of the herbalists, regarding the faith that they placed in the healing virtues of our wild flowers, yet modern research has justified that faith. For we find that in spite of its alloy with magic, astrology, and superstition, much of the solid gold of truth remains. The Doctrine of Signatures, as it was called, was firmly believed in by the old herbalists. The idea was, that by the mercy of God, many of the herbs that He made for the service of men, were stamped, as it were, and signed with their characters, so that they could be read at a glance. One of the chief exponents of this theory was Paracelsus, or to give him his full name, Philippus = 28 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus, of Hohenheim. He lived from 1493-1541, and was a doctor, but not a favourite with his fellow-men, owing to his almost incredible boastfulness. The word “‘ bombast ” was in all probability coined from his name. At the same time, although he was something of a quack, his writings are occasionally illumined with real scientific insight, and certainly he infused new life into the chemistry and botany of his day. For an understanding of this doctrine of signatures, it may be enlightening to quote from Paracelsus himself: ‘I have ofttimes declared, how by the outward shapes and qualities of things, we may know their inward virtues, which God hath put in them for the use of man. Soin St. John’s Wort we may take notice of the leaves, the porosity of the leaves, the veins—(1) The porosity or holes in the leaves signifies to us that this herb helps inward or outward holes or cuts in the skin. (2) The flowers of St. John’s Wort, when they are putrified, they are like blood; which teaches us that this herb is good for wounds, to close them and fill them up.” An Italian, of the name of Porta, developed this theory still further, and often, it must be confessed, he soared very much into the realms of fancy. He held that herbs with a yellow sap would cure jaundice, whilst those whose surface was rough to the touch, would heal those diseases that destroy the natural smoothness of the skin. ‘The resemblance of certain plants to certain animals opens up to Porta a vast field of conjecture and romancing. Plants with flowers shaped like butterflies would cure the bites of insects, while those whose roots HERBS AND THEIR ORIGIN 29 or fruits had a jointed appearance, and thus remotely suggested a scorpion, were sure remedies for the bites of serpents. William Cole, an Englishman, in 1657, did much work in furthering this doctrine of plant signatures. He seems to have possessed a philosophic mind, and to have been much troubled because a large proportion of the plants with undoubted medicinal virtues, had no obvious signature. However, he got over this difficulty by concluding that a certain number were endowed with signatures, in order to set man on the right track in his search for herbal remedies; the remainder were purposely left blank, in order to encourage his skill and resource in dis- covering their properties for himself. A further ingenious argument is, that a number of plants are left without signatures because, if all were signed, “the rarity of it, which is the delight, would be taken away by too much harping upon one string.” Another strong supporter in this country of the doctrine of signatures was the astrological botanist, Robert Turner. He states that God has imprinted upon the plants, herbs, and flowers, as it were in hieroglyphics, the very signature of their virtue. “In physic by some signature, Nature herself doth point a cure.” In 1644, Robert Turner wrote: “‘ For what climate soever is subject to any particular disease, in the same place there grows a cure.” This point of view deserves our gratitude, as it led to Dr. Maclagan’s discovery of salicin as a cure for rheumatism. On the ground that in the case of malarial disease “‘ the poisons which cause them 30 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN and the remedy which cures them are naturally produced under similar climatic conditions,” Macla- gan sought and found in the bark of the willow, which inhabits low-lying, damp situations, this drug, which has proved so valuable in the treatment of rheumatism. Paracelsus was full of botanical mysticism, and was a firm believer in the influence of the heavenly bodies upon the vegetable world, or, in other words, in botanical astrology. He considered that each plant was under the influence of some particular star, and that it was this influence which drew the plant out of the earth when the seed germinated. He held each plant to be a terrestrial star, and each star a spiritualised plant. This subject of botanical astrology will be more fully dealt with in Chapter X. The Doctrine of Signatures explains the popular names of many of our herbs : Clary, or Clear Eyes, being most useful in all eye troubles. Prunella, or Self-Heal, acting as a magic balm on all cuts or bruises. Gout Weed, so called on account of its efficacy in all gouty afflictions. Feverfew, being a most soothing and calming herb in all feverish diseases. Foxglove leaves are of great value, yielding the drug digitalin, a very old remedy in heart trouble. An extract made from Dandelion roots is used in liver tonics. HERBS AND THEIR ORIGIN 31 In Deadly Nightshade both root and leaves are used; their medicinal value is for the relief of pain in rheumatic diseases, and also by oculists for the dilation of the pupil of the eye. Viper’s Bugloss has its stem speckled like a snake, pointing out to all that it could cure snake bites and the stings of scorpions. In spite of its pretty forget-me-not-blue flowers, the plant has a viperish look, which makes it very distinctive. Pulmonaria, or Lung Wort, has broadish leaves, spotted in a manner resembling the lungs of men and animals. It was esteemed useful in all chest and lung complaints. The Heart Trefoil has heart-shaped leaves, which are sometimes bloodstained, so this herb protects the heart. The leaves of the St. ‘Fohn’s Wort look as if they were perforated with tiny holes, like the pores of the skin, so here we have a herb that cures cuts and abrasions. This herb is indeed one of the most magical of plants, as evil spirits positively shudder at it, flying off at the first whiff of its scent. There are many legends woven about the St. John’s Wort, and one of them tells us that if after sunset on St. John’s Eve you happen to step on the plant, a fairy horse arises out of the ground which will carry you gloriously all the night, to leave you wherever you may happen to be when the first ray of the rising sun stirs the world. | There may jbe more in these cures of Nature than people of late years have been willing to 32. THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN allow; remedies are not necessarily so much more effective for being done up with all the chemist’s skill and cunning of white paper, scarlet sealing-wax, and pink string. ‘These are attractive, no doubt, and aids to faith (which is half the battle); but supposing that customary and orthodox medicines happened to be out of reach, it might be very useful indeed to possess some old-time knowledge of the herbal remedies of our forefathers. Some people are inclined to raise objections on the score that herbalism is a quack or empirical system of medicine unworthy of support or serious consideration. They believe it to be a mere tissue of “ old wives’ lore” and silly superstition, and are probably not aware that modern pharmaceutical research has vindicated the reputation of many an old-fashioned “simple,” and has winnowed herbalism of its ignorant elements, raising the practice of herbal pharmacy to a scientific element. How did the herbal ideas of healing arise ? Simply by watching the self-cure of animals, whose instinct led them to the plants with healing properties for various complaints. An interesting old superstition centres round the Goat, from which we learn that he was supposed to be the “ Herbalist Quadruped,” clever in finding herbs that were good for physic. In the Middle Ages every monastery and convent had its physic garden, and it is to the untiring skill and energy of the monks that we owe much of our knowledge of medicinal plants and their uses. The monks were, indeed, the grand pioneers of gardening in all its branches, and we owe them a very large debt for their skill and practice in these matters. HERBS AND THEIR ORIGIN 33 In olden days the herb Rue was brought into court to protect the Judge and Bench from the contagion of gaol fever, and it was probably quite effective, though nobody knew the reason. Recent research has shown that the essential oil contained in rue, as in other aromatic herbs like elecampane, rosemary, and cinnamon, serves by its germicidal principles to extinguish bacterial life. Nobody knew much about bacteria in the time of Elizabeth Fry, nor was much known about the alkaloids contained in plant tissues prior to the discovery of “ opium salt,” or morphine, by Derosne in 1803. Yet rue had been disinfecting stuffy law courts, and poppies had been acting as soporifics, long before the action of either came to be explained. According to old beliefs, one of the most useful plants to grow in one’s garden is the Camomile, regarded as the plants’ physician. Nothing was thought to keep a garden so healthy, and it was even said to revive drooping and sickly plants if brought near them. Saffron was used very extensively for dyeing, in fact so much so that Henry VIII. issued a royal proclamation strictly forbidding its use for hair- dyeing purposes. Bacon says of saffron that it conveys medicine to the heart, cures its palpitation, removes melancholy and uneasiness, revives the brain, renders the mind cheerful, and generates boldness. Rather many virtues for one small plant to claim ! For any meek and’gentle souls who may wish to cultivate ferocity for the time being, it may be useful to them to know that the root of Cat Mint, when chewed, will make the most quiet and gentle 34 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN person fierce and quarrelsome. There is a legend of a hangman who could never bring himself to perform his office until he had partaken of this herb. Cats are most astonishingly fond of the plant, and will seldom fail to dig up a newly-planted specimen if they chance to come across it, from which fact sprang the couplet: “ Tf you set it, the cats will get it ; If you sow it, the cats won’t know it.” Rats, on the other hand, have a great and shudder- ing aversion for the cat mint, and will go nowhere near it. Corn Minit has quite a different use, as it was said to prevent milk from curdling, and that the milk of cows who fed on this herb could not be turned into cheese. Fennel seems to have served many purposes, and to be the worker of many good deeds. In the time of Edward I. we read that the poor ate it when hungry and it satisfied them, the fat ate it to make themselves thin, and the blind to restore their sight. “* Above the lowly plant it towers, The Fennel with its yellow flowers, ; And in an earlier age than ours, Was gifted with the wondrous powers Lost vision to restore.” Dill was of old a very favourite herb for use in magic: “ Here holy Vervain and here Dill, *Gainst witchcraft much availing.” Pennyroyal was another herb with equally good virtues, as it was said to counteract the evil eye. HERBS AND THEIR ORIGIN 35 Pliny tells us that a chaplet of pennyroyal worn on the head, is the best cure for headache and giddiness. Wormwood is, with the exception of rue, the bitterest herb known; but everyone must regard it with interest, because of its responsibility for the world-famous absinthe. In France, acres of wormwood are grown simply for the purpose of making absinthe; the leaves, eaten raw, are said to be very wholesome. Tansy was used in the old days for cakes and puddings, in spite of the fact that tansy undoubtedly ranks as one of the “bitter” herbs. It appears that tansy cakes were eaten more especially at Easter-time, as some writers tell us, to correct the ill-effects of a prolonged fish diet. We have the support of an old Easter carol for this belief: “‘ Soone at Easter cometh Alleluya, With butter, cheese, and a Tansy.” The Verbena, or Vervain, was the Herba Sacra, said by the Romans to cure bites from animals, arrest venom, and act as an antidote to many poisons; and feasts called ‘‘ Verbanalia ” were held annually in its honour. Then legend catches up the thought, and tells us how the herb was first found on Calvary, and staunched the wounds of Christ. “‘ Hallowed be thou, Vervain, As thou growest on the ground, For in the Mount of Calvary There thou wast first found.” The Spikenard of Scripture is made from a valerian that grows in the Himalayan Ranges. The medicinal 36 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN properties of valerian have been well known through all the ages; cats delight in it to such an extent that they will go perfectly wild over it at times, gnawing at the roots, and trying to tear up the whole plant. Rosemary is a plant of many virtues, and in olden times no garden was considered worthy of the name which did not include this inestimable herb. It was enormously in request for making wine, physic, and scent, and up till the present time it is one of the ingredients of Eau-de-Cologne. ‘The flowers are well beloved by the bees, making most excellent honey. Bergamot is another great favourite with the bees; in fact, its old-fashioned name is *‘ Bee-Balm,”’ surely sufficient to prejudice anyone in its favour ! The flowers are a warm crimson, and make a glorious patch of colour in the garden. Oil of bergamot goes into perfumery, and an extract from the leaves helps to compose the preparation known to modern doctors as thymol. Pimpernel, in the olden days, was a sure remedy for the bite of a mad dog, and also an effective remover of all sadness. It is very interesting to note that the pimpernel should have won this character for cheerfulness amongst the English, for the name in the Greek means to laugh. Fumitory is another of the herbs with a magic past, as its very name will tell us, for many of the old books say that when burned, the smoke was used in sorcery. Others again say that instead of growing from seed, it is produced from vapours rising from the earth. Truly a plant to connect with the witch, her cauldron, and her black cat! | | HERBS AND THEIR ORIGIN 37 ‘In every plant There lives a spirit, more or less akin Unto the spirit of humanity. Some heal diseases dire; others wake Strange whimsies in the busy brain of man.” ScENT IN THE GARDEN. Its Zésthetic and Practical Uses.—In olden days no garden was considered complete without its borders of sweet-scented flowers and herbs, and it seems that a great deal more attention was paid to that fragrant subject than is the case in these days. Too often individual flowers are “over -culti- vated’ to produce blossoms of colossal size or striking and dazzling colours, and the delicate beauty of fragrance is eliminated. Some of the newer roses are a typical case in point: they are floral wonders in every sense of the word except that of scent, and that intangible and subtle delight seems totally lacking in these otherwise perfect flowers. Modern research has proved that our forefathers were quite right in their cultivation of flowers and plants for scent; they were not merely luxuriously delighting their senses, as science has now disclosed to us that ozone is developed when the sun shines on most kinds of fragrant plants, such as fir and pine trees, scented flowers, and sweet herbs generally. John Evelyn, that wise and famous gardener of old, had very ambitious ideas, as he soberly and solemnly proposed to make London the healthiest, as well as the happiest city in the world, by sur- 38 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN rounding it with plots and hedgerows of sweet- briar, jasmine, lilies, rosemary, lavender, musk, and marjoram. But, unfortunately, he was not able to carry out his ideas, so we have not been able to see the results of such a truly alluring scheme. To quote an old-world opinion on scent: “Thyme will renew the spirits and vital energy in long walks under an August sun; the Maréchal Niel rose is invigorating in lowness of mind or body. Sweetbriar promotes cheerfulness; yellow bedstraw, cowslip, wallflower, damask and pink china roses, plum blossom, bog myrtle, and wild honeysuckle refresh the spirits; while the smell of ground ivy, charlock, woodruff, rosemary, and fresh-cut grass will often prove a bodily refresh- ment.”’ These views should not surprise us, as, considering how large a part the visible plays in our enjoyment of gardens, it is not therefore very astonishing that much of their charm should also depend upon the invisible. For it always seems that there is something even more wonderful and subtle about the unseen gift of fragrance, than about the more striking gift of colour; scent is less definable, less explainable, and its wonders have been less explored. In the herb garden, fragrance depends more on the leaves of plants than the flowers, and one secret is soon discovered: the value of leaf scents. Flower scents are evanescent, leaf odours are permanent. On the other hand, leaf odours, though “ready when sought,” do not force themselves upon us, as it were, like flower scents, which we HERBS AND THEIR ORIGIN 39 must smell whether we will or no. The leaf scents have to be coaxed out by touching, bruising, or pressing, but there they are, all the time. HERBULARIS “A chaplet then of Herbs Ill make Than which though yours be braver, Yet this of mine I’ll undertake Shall not be short of savour: With Basil then I will begin, Whose scent is wondrous pleasing; This Eglantine I'll next put in, The sense with sweetness seizing; Then in my Lavender I lay, Muscado put among it, With here and there a leaf of Bay, Which still shall run along it. “‘Germander, Marjoram and Thyme, Which uséd are for strewing; With Hyssop as an Herb most prime Here in my breath bestowing; Then Balm and Mint help to make up My Chaplet, and for trial Cost Mary that so likes the cup, And next it Pennyroyal. Then Burnet shall bear up with this, Whose leaf I greatly fancy; Some Chamomile does not amiss With Savoury and some Tansy. “‘ Then here and there I’ll put a sprig Of Rosemary into it, Thus not too little nor too big, Tis done if I can do it.” Micuaet Drayton, CHAPTER V THE PATRON SAINTS OF GARDENING “Come, my spade. There is no ancient gentlemen but gardeners, ditchers, and grave-makers; they hold up Adam’s profession.” —SHAKEsPEARE: Hamlet. Wits all the myth and legend interwoven with gardening, it is only fitting that gardeners should have a patron saint to guard their interests and look after their welfare, and in this matter they are particularly lucky, having two saints as their especial patrons: St. Fiacre and St. Phocas. All through the ages we owe far more than we know or imagine to those grand pioneers the monks, for their skill in flower culture and herbalism; and gardeners, who, to a man, are dedicated to such a peaceful and meditative pursuit, should care to know of the story of St. Fiacre, the Irish prince, who turned hermit, and after his death was hailed the patron of gardeners, and of St. Phocas, the holy gardener who was martyred for the Faith in early days. The lives of these holy men should prove of great inspiration to all tillers of the soil in these very mundane days, and true gardeners, being simple- minded folk, will want none of the ““ New Thought ” of these modern days. The old religion and the same patron saints of a few centuries ago will doubtless be quite good enough for them. 40 THE PATRON SAINTS OF GARDENING 41 St. Fiacre was by birth an Irishman, and, tradition tells us, nobly born, probably a prince. But he left Ireland with some companions in quest of solitude, at that time when missionary zeal was sending Irish monks all over Europe to convert many to the Faith. Fiacre made his vows at a new monastery which St. Faro, Bishop of Meaux, had founded on the River Marne, the Monastery of St. Croix. But even in this holy life of strict rule and austerity, St. Fiacre craved still greater solitude, so he went to the holy Bishop, and told him of his desire to become a hermit, and the Bishop, being a good and saintly man himself, read the right inten- tion in Fiacre’s heart, and gave him a solitary dwell- ing in a forest. There Fiacre soon cleared a space and built a small oratory in honour of Our Lady, and a hut close by, where he slept. Then, this done, he began to make his garden. St. Fiacre must have thought that here in the forest, in the midst of his garden, he was safe from the world, and yet he became known. Possibly some swineherd or shepherd whom the saint had befriended, went forth on his way and spread news of this holy man who had made the wilderness to blossom as arose. So the news filtered through the country, and the people came to see this wonder; but when they had heard the holy man preach and seen him heal the sick, they were convinced of his sanctity, and knew that this was no magician, but a saint of God. Finally the saint was obliged to build another hut to accommodate those who came from afar to consult 42 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN him, and so he went to the Bishop and asked him for more land. The Bishop, it must be remem- bered, was himself a saint, and he granted Fiacre’s request in a curious way. He gave to him as much land as he could enclose with his spade in one day. So our holy gardener hurried back to the forest, and marked out a space larger than any dozen men could clear in one day, and then, after going to his oratory to pray for help, he set to work. Well, there were people watching him from various parts, and before very long a deputation went off in hot haste to fetch the Bishop: a miracle was happening, for far and wide, wherever the eye could reach, there were angels at work felling the trees, clearing the ground, and others again were busy with spades digging. By sunset the space was all cleared. And so, by this miracle of enlarging the space of his garden, this saint has rightly become the patron saint of gardeners. He died about the year 670, and his feast is observed on August 30. There seems no authentic reason for St. Fiacre also being known as the patron saint of cab-drivers. It arose through one man, who let out carriages for hire, placing a statue of St. Fiacre over his doorway, and all the coaches starting from this point began to be called “ fiacres,” and the drivers placed images of him on their carriages and hailed him as their patron. On the site of St. Fiacre’s cell a large Benedictine Priory was built, and here his relics were kept and did many wonders of healing. THE PATRON SAINTS OF GARDENING 43 Tue Lecenp oF St. Puocas, Patron oF GARDENERS AND SAILORS. St. Phocas lived towards the end of the third century, near the gate of Sinope, a city of Pontus. He obtained his living by cultivating a garden, in which he grew flowers and vegetables; and, according to tradition, everything he grew flourished exceedingly, and was much more prolific than under other people’s cultivation. There is a statue of St. Phocas at St. Mark’s, Venice, where he is portrayed as of a fine and muscular build, with a flowing beard, and dressed as a gardener, holding a spade. Finally, he died for the Faith, being martyred during the Diocletian persecution in the year 303. It came to the ears of the heathen rulers that Phocas was a Christian, and lictors were at once sent out to search for and kill him. But they were unable to find his house, and came there all un- knowingly for shelter, little guessing it was the house of Phocas. He gave them food and hos- pitality, as was his wont in the case of all strangers and wayfarers, and when he asked their errand, they said they were looking for one Phocas, a Christian, and begged his help. The holy Phocas invited them to rest there that night, promising to be their guide the next day. After they had gone to bed the saint went out and dug a grave for himself amongst his own beloved flowers, and then prepared his soul for death. The morning came and the saint’s guests were ready to depart, when he stayed them by saying they need go no further, as he was Phocas, for whom 44 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN they were searching. The lictors were grieved and horrified at the idea of staining their hands with the blood of their host; nevertheless they obeyed their orders and severed his head from his body, thereby procuring for the holy man the martyr’s crown. Holy Church keeps his feast day on July 3. St. Phocas is also the special patron of sailors on the Black Sea and the Mediterranean, for he has often been seen at night, when the tempest arises, waking up the weary steersman at the rudder, and at other times minding the cable and sails, or at the prow looking ahead for the shallows. Therefore it became a custom with sailors to have Phocas for their guest, and day by day they set aside a portion of each meal for the martyr, nor would they touch it till they had laid by the small coin that was its equivalent. Then, at the end of the voyage, they would distribute among the poor the sum thus collected. St. BENEDICT AND THE BEEs. In common with many other legends, that of St. Benedict seems to have been tucked away so tidily in a back compartment, in England, that it has been entirely forgotten by most people. Tradition tells us that St. Benedict takes a special interest in protecting people and animals against disease, and the holy saint was said to be particu- larly fond of bees. In Brittany, there is hardly a hive of bees to be seen without its little blessed medallion hanging over the doorway, or “ bee-way.” THE PATRON SAINTS OF GARDENING 45 The average, practical, unromantic English person will say: “‘ But the Breton peasant is, of course, quite uneducated and so superstitious.” ‘These hard-headed, material-minded ones would scorn to have recourse to some “ mythical saint who lived in those unenlightened Middle Ages ”’! Still, it is a beautiful act of faith on the part of these poor peasants of Brittany to hang “ little Father St. Benedict ”’ over their hives, saying every Tuesday (a day set apart particularly to his memory) five Paters in honour of the Passion of Our Lord, three Aves in honour of Our Lady, and three Glorias in honour of St. Benedict. Then worry no more about the bees, but leave them to the good saint; he will look after them and see that no disease touches them. The bees, being very psychic, are quite aware of the blessed medallion hanging over their door- way, and they like to think that a great saint in heaven is looking after their interests; so on this score they will probably thrive all the better, even supposing that St. Benedict saw fit to do nothing special for them, which is not very likely. “‘ A Garden is a lovesome thing, God wot: Rose plot, Fringed pool, Ferned grot. The veriest school Of peace; and yet the fool Contends that God is not. Not God ! in gardens! When the eve is cool? Nay, but I have a sign; Tis very sure God walks in mine.” Tuomas Epwarp Brown. CHAPTER VI SOME BEE LORE “The swarthy bee is a buccaneer, A burly velveted rover, Who loves the booming wind in his ear, As he sails the seas of clover. “ His flimsy sails abroad on the wind Are shivered with fairy thunder; On a line that sings to the light of his wings, He makes for the lands of wonder.” Every gardener should be a bee-keeper, and every garden should have its hive of bees, for in all matters of fruit culture it has been abundantly proved that we are absolutely dependent on the bees for our fruit crops. Everyone who grows fruit knows that there are some trees and bushes that may be furnished with a wealth of blossom which from some cause fails to set, and this failure is invariably attributed to frost or cold winds during the flowering period. But it often happens that neither of these causes is responsible, and much investigation has been given to the subject of late years, both in this country and in America. And the result of these observations shows us that the primary cause for fruit blossom failing to set, is very often due to the fact that some varieties bear self-sterile flowers, that is to say, flowers incapable of being sale with their own pollen. 4 SOME BEE LORE 47 Thus, for example, if one grew Cox’s Orange Pippin only, the probability is that, though the trees might flower profusely, few if any fruits would be formed, unless bees were plentiful in the district to convey the necessary pollen from other varieties. On the other hand, one might grow only Worcester Pearmain and secure abundant crops, as the flowers of this variety are capable of being fertilised with their own pollen. Gooseberry and currant flowers are self-fertile, but cannot self-pollinate themselves, as their pollen grains are glutinous, so the agency of bees is required to transfer the pollen to the stigma. Raspberries and loganberries do not fruit so freely if their flowers are not pollinated by the bees. It can easily thus be seen how very dependent we are upon the bees for our fruit crops, and this being the case, surely we should endeavour to learn more of their life, and try to encourage bee-keeping on a much larger scale than is now practised in this country. True, of late years there has been a terrible scourge, the “Isle of Wight” disease, which has carried off many large stocks of bees completely, but now it almost seems that the plague has abated somewhat, and a great endeavour should be made to bring the lost art of bee-keeping back into all the country villages. THE ORIGIN OF THE Honey BEE. Amongst all the fables of ancient mythology, that dealing with the origin of the honey bee is without doubt one of the prettiest. On the birth of Jupiter, his mother, Ops, entrusted 48 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN him to the two daughters of the King of Greece, Melissa and Amalthea, in order that the young god might escape the fate that awaited him, that of providing a repast for his father, Saturn. To smother the cries of the unfortunate baby god, the sisters continually beat upon brazen pans, and this attracted the neighbouring wild bees, who forth- with undertook the responsibility of his nourish- ment, bringing him daily supplies of honey. In acknowledgment of their services, Jupiter endowed these wild bees with the power of parthenogenesis, so waiving the ordinary male and female principles; and entrusted their descendants with the work of gathering honey for the food of man. The countryfolk of Scotland and Ireland, who seem to live in such close touch with Nature, still cling to the old custom of “ telling the bees.” This is a relic of the time when the honey bees were looked upon as the guardians of the household, and every important event in the family life, whether of joy, sorrow, or adventure, was told to them as a mark of courtesy and consideration. “‘ Bees, Bees! Haste to your bees, Hide from your neighbours as much as you please, But all that has happened to us you must tell, Or else we will give you no honey to sell.” The old bee-fathers used to raise their hats to the honey bee, a gracious act of courtesy, the spirit of which we should do well to emulate. It is an old and well-known fact that the honey bee is possessed of marvellous—one might almost say psychical—perceptions, and is extremely sensitive to conditions not merely material and physical, SOME BEE LORE 49 but mental and even moral, which we mortals cannot always appreciate. Numerous cases are known of bees attacking people who, to all appearance, treated these relent- less judges of mankind with due respect and con- sideration, but who have gone to their bees in anger or in a state of nervous excitement or ex- haustion. Pliny solemnly cautions thieves and malefactors against approaching hives at any time, and Butler, a devoted student of bee life, living in the reign of Queen Anne, gives most elaborate advice as to the necessary qualities of the good bee-master. With the ancient Romans, a flight of bees was considered a bad omen. Appian says a swarm of bees alighted on the altar and prognosticated the fatal issue of the battle of Pharsalia. It is said that when Plato was in his cradle a swarm of bees alighted on his mouth. In Christian art, St. Ambrose is represented with a beehive, as there is a similar tradition of a swarm of bees alighting on his mouth when he was an infant. ‘Marriage, birth or burying, News across the seas, All you’re sad or merry in, You must tell the bees. Tell ’em going in and out Where the Fanners fan, ’Cos the bees are just about As curious as a man. ** Don’t you wait where trees are, Where the lightnings play, Nor don’t you hate where bees are, Or else they’ll fly away, 50 ‘THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN Pine away, dwine away, Anything to leave you. But if you never grieve your bees, Your bees ’Il never grieve you.” The greatest scientists and most devoted students of the wonderful bee commonwealth, all agree with Maeterlinck that—‘“‘ Beyond the appreciable facts of their life we know but little of the bees, and the closer our acquaintance with them, the nearer is the appreciation of our ignorance brought to us.”’ This great bee lover, after many years of bee- keeping, says: “ You will find that we shall often halt before the unknown,” and that we most cer- tainly do, in that most wonderful and complex city known as the hive. In his book “‘’ The Life of the Bee,” Mactevlinck lifts the veil for us, and shows us the interior of a hive from the bees’ point of view, as far as our limited human understanding can picture the world as it looks to them. *“‘ Inside the hive, it would seem that from the height of a dome more colossal than that of St. Peter’s at Rome, waxen walls descend to the ground, balanced in the void and the darkness. “Each of these walls, whose substance is still immaculate and fragrant, of virgin, silvery freshness, contains thousands of cells, stored with provisions sufficient to feed the whole people for several weeks. “ Here, lodged in transparent cells, are the pollens, love ferments of every flower of the spring, making brilliant splashes of red and yellow, of black and mauve. “Close by, sealed with a seal only to be broken SOME BEE LORE 51 in days of supreme distress, the honey of April is stored, most limpid and perfumed of all, in 20,000 reservoirs that form a long and magnificent em- broidery of gold, whose borders hang stiff and rigid. Still lower, the honey of May matures, in great open vats, by whose side watchful cohorts maintain an incessant current of air. In the centre, and far from the light, whose diamond rays steal in through the only opening, in the warmest part of the hive, there stands the abode of the future, here does it sleep and wake. For this is the royal domain of the brood cells, set apart for the Queen and her acolytes, about 10,000 cells, wherein the eggs repose, 15,000 or 16,000 chambers tenanted by larve, 40,000 dwellings inhabited by white nymphs, to whom thousands of nurses minister. “And finally, in the holy of holies of these parts, are the three, four, or six sealed palaces, vast in size compared with the others, where the adolescent princesses lie who await their hour; wrapped in a kind of shroud, all of them pale and motionless, and fed in the darkness.” It seems that of all the insect associations, there are none that have more excited the attention and admiration of mankind in every age, than the colonies of bees, and many ancient Greek and Roman writers are loud in their praise. Marvellous and wonderful in their absurdity, were some of the errors and fables which many of the ancients believed, with regard to the generation and propagation of the “ busy bee.”’ For instance, that they were sometimes produced from the putrid bodies of oxen and lions, the kings and leaders from the brain, and the vulgar herd from the 52 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN flesh. ‘This fable was derived probably from swarms of bees having been observed, as in the case of Samson, to take possession of the dried carcasses of these animals; or possibly from the myriads of flies (for often the ignorant do not readily distin- guish flies from bees) generated in the decaying flesh of dead animals. This idea is particularly repulsive though, when suggested in connection with such a clean insect as a bee, for they cannot tolerate dirt in any shape orform. ‘Their own hives are kept most scrupulously clean, and often they have been known to attack an unwashed specimen of humanity, who dares to come near their hives smelling of perspiration. It is quite true, as Emerson tells us: *“‘ Aught unsavoury or unclean Hath my insect never seen.” Another ancient notion with regard to the bees, although more fragrant, was equally absurd—that the bees collect their young from the flowers and foliage of certain plants. ‘The reed and the olive especially, had this virtue of generating infant bees attributed to them. Aristotle and Pliny seem to have had quite up- to-date ideas concerning the hive and its inmates, except in their designating the head of the hive to be a king instead of a queen. Aristotle tells us that the kings generate both kings and workers, and the latter the drones. It is right, he says, that the kings should remain inside the hive, unfettered by any employment, because they are made for the multiplication of the species. Aristotle also tells us that in his time SOME BEE LORE 53 some affirmed that the worker bees were the females and the drones the males: an opinion which he fights with a somewhat far-fetched analogy, that Nature would never give offensive armour to females ! Virgil describes the attachment of the bees to their sovereign with great truth and spirit in the following lines: ** Lydian nor Mede so much his king adores, Nor those on Nilus’ or Hydaspes’ shores; The state united stands while he remains; But should he fall, what dire confusion reigns. Their waxen combs and honey, late their joy, With grief and rage distracted, they destroy. He guards the works, with awe they him surround, And crowd about him with triumphant sound; Him frequent on their duteous shoulders bear, Bleed, fall, and die for him in glorious war.” To quote a later and more up-to-date authority on this subject, Réaumur, the great French scientist, says: “‘ With regard to the ordinary attention and homage that they pay to their sovereign, the bees do more than respect their queen. They are constantly on the watch to make themselves useful to her, and to render her every kind office; they are for ever offering her honey; they lick her with their proboscis, and wherever she goes she has a court to attend upon her.” Then, again, think of the complicated mechanism of the hive, where all is done with exact and military precision, all the inmates doing their work quietly and silently, without any fuss or bother. To quote Maeterlinck’s words: “There are the nurses, who attend the nymphs 54 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN and the larve; the ladies of honour who wait on the queen, and never allow her out of their sight; the house-bees who air, refresh, or heat the hive by fanning their wings, and hasten the evaporation of the honey that may be too highly charged with water; the architects, masons, and wax-workers who form the chain, and construct the combs; the foragers who sally forth to the flowers in search of the nectar that turns into honey, of the pollen that feeds the nymphs and larve, the propolis that welds and strengthens the buildings of the city, or the water and salt required by the youth of the nation. “*’'The orders have gone forth to the chemists, who ensure the preservation of the honey by letting a drop of formic acid fall in from the end of their sting; to the capsule-makers, who seal down the cells when the treasure is ripe; to the sweepers, who maintain public places and streets most irre- proachably clean; to the bearers, whose duty it is to remove the corpses; and to the amazons of the guard, who keep watch on the threshold by day and by night, question comers and goers, recognise the novices who return from their very first flight, scare away vagabonds, marauders, and loiterers, expel all intruders, attack redoubtable foes in a body, and, if need be, barricade the entrance.” Such is the continual, daily work, methodical and organised, going on in each and every hive, and then human beings think that they are the only living creatures who know the meaning of work ! To quote once more from Bliss Carman in “A More Ancient Mariner,” from whom came the verses at the beginning of this chapter: SOME BEE LORE “‘ He never could box the compass round; He doesn’t know port from starboard ; But he knows the gates of the sundown straits Where the choicest goods are harboured. ** He never could see the Rule of Three, But he knows a rule of thumb Better than Euclid’s, better than yours, Or the teachers’ yet to come. “‘ He drones along with his rough sea-song, And the throat of a salty tar, This devil-may-care, till he makes his lair, By the light of a yellow star. “* He looks like a gentleman, lives like a lord, And works like a Trojan hero; Then loafs all winter upon his hoard, With the mercury at zero.” 55 CHAPTER VII SOME BIRD LORE * The birds, who make sweet music for us all In our dark hours, as David did for Saul. “Do you ne’er think what wondrous beings these? Do you ne’er think who made them, and who taught The dialect they speak, where melodies Alone are the interpreters of thought? Whose household words are songs in many keys, Sweeter than instrument of man e’er caught ! Whose habitations in the tree-tops even Are half-way houses on the road to Heaven !” LoncreLLtow: The Birds of Killingworth. Birps IN THE GARDEN. Birps are, speaking generally, absolutely essential in the garden, and they are far more friends than enemies of the gardener, if he would only realise this fact. But because a blackbird or a thrush steals a few cherries or strawberries, a house-sparrow mis- chievously nips off a few crocus flowers in the spring, a chaffinch or greenfinch purloins a few seeds, or a bullfinch vigorously pulls off the buds of goose- berry or pear—forthwith, in the gardeners’ estima- tion, all birds are enemies, and must be got rid of at once. All during the season of the “ soft fruit ”’ the patience of gardeners and owners of gardens certainly is apt to be somewhat tried by the birds, 56 SOME BIRD LORE 57 who will, especially during hot weather, make much havoc with the fruit. And how many people look on this as otherwise than sheer theft? Yet there are two other points of view, and the first is, that very often thirst will drive the birds to the fruit, and if their needs were more thought of, and water supplied regularly in the garden, then the fruit crop might not suffer so badly. Secondly, we should bear in mind that for ser- vices rendered the birds are surely entitled to a percentage of the fruit in each garden. Joseph Addison writes on this subject: ‘‘ There is another circumstance in which I am very par- ticular, or, as my neighbours call me, very whim- sical: as my garden invites into it all the birds of the country, by offering them the conveniency of springs and shades, solitude and shelter, I do not suffer anyone to destroy their nests in the spring, or drive them from their usual haunts in fruit time. I value my garden more for being full of blackbirds than cherries, and very frankly give them fruit for their songs. By this means, I have always the music of the season in its perfection, and am highly de- lighted to see the jay or the thrush hopping about my walks, and shooting before my eyes across the several little glades and alleys that I pass through.” The kind acts performed by many individual species of birds are manifold: for instance, in the case of blackbirds and thrushes, they are inveterate fruit-stealers, but at the same time their diet is very largely made up of slugs and snails in great quantities. The thrush especially, if left undis- 58 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN turbed, will dispose of a large number of snails; he usually selects and keeps one flat stone on which to break the shell of the snail and get at the dainty morsel within. And one hears the steady crack- crack of the snail being beaten against the stone by the thrush’s strong beak. The chaffinch and the greenfinch feed on weeds and small caterpillars, being most active in tracking down the latter. Starlings feed on worms, leather- jackets, and practically any soil grubs. Robins and wrens are very fond of worms and small insects. The house-sparrow, our much-maligned friend, whom many people would like to exterminate altogether because (they say) he is so utterly useless, lives very largely on grubs and other insects. The seagull is very partial to leather-jackets and wireworms, whenever he can find any, and the magpie and the owl feed on mice, voles, and all surface caterpillars. Surely if these birds render us such excellent service in attacking the chief pests that infest our crops we ought not to begrudge their levying a toll on a few fruits as a reward for their services. Think of the dreary picture that Longfellow paints for us if we really did succeed in trapping and killing all the birds out of our gardens! “Think of your woods and orchards without birds ! Of empty nests that cling to boughs and beams, As in an idiot’s brain remembered words Hang empty ’mid the cobwebs of his dreams! Will bleat of flocks or bellowing of herds Make up for the lost music, when your teams Drag home the stingy harvest, and no more The feathered gleaners follow to your door? SOME BIRD LORE 59 ** You call them thieves and pillagers; but know They are the wingéd wardens of your farms, Who from the cornfields drive the insidious foe, And from your harvests keep a hundred harms; Even the blackest of them all, the crow, Renders good service as your man-at-arms, Crushing the beetle in his coat of mail, And crying havoc on the slug and snail.” One feels that one can endorse the terse, strong language of Dr. Abbott, the naturalist: “‘ A creature that will destroy a song-bird’s nest is a pest, and whether furred, feathered, four-legged, or a boy, ought to be exterminated.” It is undoubtedly a fact, and a sad one, that in America the bluebirds have had an extraordinarily hard time; they are among the most confiding and friendly of all the bird tribe, and yet they have been uncompromisingly sought and killed for their gay and beautiful plumage. And it seems that the wee humming-birds, whose diminutive size should have secured them from harm, are seen oftener now on wearing apparel than on the flowers. Whittier, one of the kindliest natured of men, was constrained to write on this subject: “1 could almost wish that the shooters of birds, the taxidermists who prepare them, and the fashionable wearers of their plumage, might share the penalty of the Ancient Mariner who shot the albatross.” Many students in ornithology are exceedingly wasteful of bird life, and the rarer becomes a species the less are the chances that any will escape. Every ambitious collector is anxious for a specimen; it 60 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN matters not that the species has been often de- scribed, its structures and habits well known, the bird must pay with its life for the penalty of being rare. Surely this is a burlesque on science, a travesty on the subject of natural history. But even this horrible wrong seems dwarfed when compared with the destruction of the birds for millinery and decorative purposes. If the facts connected with this traffic could generally be made known, a thrill of indignation would take possession of every right-minded person, and the community, in wrath would demand that this outrage must cease; but, unfortunately, the killing is carried on surreptitiously, much of it in out-of-the-way places. In America, those who have investigated the subject know that thousands of men and boys all over the country, are regularly employed to kill and skin the native birds. Attention need not be called to the individual uses of these decorations. ‘They may be seen on the hats of rich and poor, old and young: a whole bird on one, a half-dozen wings on another; beaks and breasts on others; hateful emblems of thoughtless cruelty, most unbecoming to the women who wear them. A few more years of such wanton warfare on the birds and it almost seems that men will walk the voiceless fields and woods where, instead of bright wings amid the green foliage and artistic structures filled with eggs and fluttering birds, only unsightly nests of crawling worms will dangle from leafless bush and tree. In place of the gay carol of the bird voices, only SOME BIRD LORE 61 the fretting hum of troublesome insects will worry the listening ear: “‘ What ! would you rather see the incessant stir Of insects in the windrows of the hay, And hear the locust and the grasshopper Their melancholy hurdy-gurdies play? Is this more pleasant to you than the whir Of meadow-lark and her sweet roundelay, Or twitter of little fieldfares, as you take Your nooning in the shade of bush and brake?” Emerson, speaking on this subject, says: “We should go to the ornithologist with a new feeling, if he could teach us what the social birds say when they sit in the autumn council talking to- gether in the trees. The want of sympathy makes his record a dull dictionary. His result is a dead bird. ‘The bird is not in its ounces and inches, but in its relation to nature; and the skin or skeleton you show me is no more a heron than a heap of ashes or a bottle of gases into which his body has been reduced is Dante or Washington.” Amongst all the birds in this country, the robin and the wren have, perhaps, figured the most extensively in legend and plant lore—in fact, as the old ballad quaintly says: ‘The Robin and the Wren Are God Almighty’s cock and hen.” They have both enjoyed an amount of protection almost amounting to superstition, though the wrens did suffer rather badly some few years ago from the attacks of schoolboys. Noticing that the wrens usually kept to the shelter of the hedgerows and seldom ventured 62 THE GLORY OF THE GARDEN upon any lengthy flight, these boys, armed with sticks and stones, would beat on either side of the hedge until poor Jenny Wren was killed. In the South of Ireland, a wren is carried about in great honour, to the accompaniment of the following verse: “