1*1 Agriculture Canada Handling Agricultural Materials Storage and Conditioning of Grain and Forage 1*1 Sr app . 3 ,99, Library / Bibliotheque, Ottawa K1A0C5 Canada Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada http://www.archive.org/details/handlingagrOObire Handling Agricultural Materials Storage and Conditioning of Grain and Forage Research Branch Agriculture Canada Publication 1855/E 1990 ©Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1990 Cat. No. A15-1855/1990E ISBN 0-660-13615-5 Printed 1990 Available in Canada through authorized bookstore agents and other bookstores or by mail from Canadian Government Publishing Centre Supply and Services Canada Ottawa, Canada K1A0S9 Price is subject to change without notice Previously published under the title Canadian Agricultural Materials Handling Manual. 3.1 Grain/Forage Storage and Conditioning. Agric. Can. Publ. 5002 Also available in French under the title Manutention de produits agricoles : Entreposage et conditionnement des grains et fourrages Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Handling agricultural materials. Storage and conditioning of grain and forage / [staff editor, Sharon Rudnitski ; contract editor, Rhonda Birenbaum ; scientific adviser for contract research, L. Heslop]. - (Publication ; 1855/E) Previously published under title: Canadian agricultural materials handling manual. 3.1. Grain/forage storage and conditioning. Published also in French under title: Manutention de produits agricoles. Entreposage et conditionnement des grains et fourrages. "Prepared by UMA Engineering Ltd. -Foreword. Includes biographical references. Cat. no. A15-1855/1990E ISBN 0-660-13615-5 1. Grain-Storage. 2. Grain-Drying. 3. Forage plants-Storage. 4. Forage plants-Drying. I. Rudnitski, Sharon. II. Birenbaum, Rhonda. III. Heslop, L. IV. UMA Engineering Ltd. V. Canada. Agriculture Canada. Research Branch. VI. Series: Publication (Canada. Agriculture Canada). English ; 1855/E SB190.H35 1990 633.1'0468 C90-099109-7 Staff editor Sharon Rudnitski Research Program Service Contract editor Rhonda Birenbaum Scientific adviser for contract research L. Heslop Industry Relations Office CONTENTS Foreword 5 INTRODUCTION 7 Maintaining the quality of grain in storage 7 Controlling rodents, insects, and molds 7 Moisture control 7 Temperature control 7 Chemical control 8 2 EFFECTS OF MOISTURE, TEMPERATURE, AND TIME ON GRAIN STORAGE 8 2.1 Moisture and temperature 8 2.2 Equilibrium moisture content 10 2.3 Determining moisture content 10 2.4 Temperature-monitoring devices 11 2.5 Time 12 3 SYSTEMS TO CONTROL MOISTURE AND TEMPERATURE 12 3.1 Aeration systems 12 3.2 Fan operation 13 3.3 Direction of airflow 13 3.4 Natural-air drying 14 3.5 Design and operation 14 3.6 Airflow rate 14 3.7 Operational aids 14 3.8 General discussion 17 3.9 Heated-air drying 17 3.10 Dryer types 21 3.11 Nonrecirculating batch dryers 21 3.12 Batch bin dryers 21 3.13 Portable batch dryers 22 3.14 Recirculating batch dryers 23 3.15 Continuous-flow dryers 23 3.16 Temperature-control systems 24 3.17 Temperature sensing 25 3.18 Fire prevention 25 3.19 Energy sources for dryers 26 3.20 Low-temperature drying 26 3.21 Combination drying 27 3.22 In-bin cooling 27 3.23 In-bin steeping and cooling (dryeration) 28 3.24 Managing dryeration systems 28 3.25 In-bin cooling and drying 29 3.26 Managing in-bin cooling and drying systems 29 3.27 Fan selection and system design 30 3.28 Sample problems 31 3.29 Aeration system parameters 31 3.30 Barley cooled in storage 32 3.31 Natural-air drying of wheat 33 3.32 Corn cooled by dryeration 33 4 SYSTEM SELECTION CRITERIA 34 4.1 Storage 34 4.2 Storage bin size 36 4.3 Drying systems 37 4.4 Dryer loading and unloading systems 39 4.5 Electrical supply 40 4.6 Materials-handling systems 40 4.7 Loading 40 4.8 Unloading 41 5 STORAGE AND CONDITIONING OF HAY 41 5.1 Drying hay in storage 41 5.2 Safe storage requirements: airflow and static pressure 43 5.3 Air distribution systems 44 5.4 Drying hay 45 5.5 Field drying 45 5.6 Arranging hay in the dryer 45 5.7 Operating the dryer 45 5.8 Terminating dryer operation 46 5.9 Supplementary heat drying 46 References and further reading 48 Tables 1 Environmental conditions associated with pests in grain storage 8 2 Moisture content designations for common species of grain 9 3 Recommended minimum airflow for a storage bin with a fully perforated floor and a level grain surface in Manitoba 15 4 Recommended airflow for natural-air drying of wheat in Edmonton, Alta. 18 5 Recommended airflow for natural-air drying of wheat in Swift Current, Sask. 18 6 Recommended airflow for natural-air drying of wheat in London, Ont. 19 7 Predicted minimum airflow for drying canola in Manitoba 19 HANDLING AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS 8 Effect of corn harvest date and initial moisture content on airflow rates for low-temperature drying of corn in Toronto, Ont. 20 9 Maximum drying temperatures 21 10 Impact on fuel consumption and dryer capacity of various drying methods for corn dried from 25% to 15% moisture content 26 11 Basic design recommendations for various drying and cooling methods 31 12 Airflow related to dryer area and hay moisture content 44 13 Fan air velocity and static pressure for drying air in storage 44 Figures 1 Seasonal moisture migration patterns 8 2 Effect of temperature and moisture content on the allowable storage time for wheat, oats, and barley 9 3 Effect of temperature and moisture content on the allowable storage time for continuously ventilated canola 9 4 Effect of temperature and moisture content on the allowable storage time for corn 10 5 Equilibrium moisture content of cereal grains and oilseeds 11 6 Nonrecirculating batch dryer 22 7 Batch bin dryer 22 8 Recirculating batch bin dryer 23 9 Portable recirculating batch dryer 23 10 Continuous-flow in-bin dryer 23 11 Portable continuous cross-flow dryer 24 12 Continuous parallel-flow portable dryer 24 13 In-bin steeping and cooling (dryeration) 28 14 Resistance of grains and oilseeds to airflow 32 15 Aeration duct arrangements for flat storage bins 36 16 Lengthwise duct spacing for rectangular buildings 36 17 Unlined primary distribution ducts 42 18 Lined rectangular distribution ducts 43 19 Fan installation for sound absorption 47 20 Relationship of temperature and time to mold formation on high-moisture hay 47 STORAGE AND CONDITIONING FOREWORD Handling Agricultural Materials is produced in complete system may require information from several parts as a guide to designers of several sections of the manual, materials-handling systems for farm and associated industries. Sections deal with selec- This section was prepared by UMA Engineer- tion and design of specific types of equipment ing Ltd., Winnipeg, Man., for the Canada for materials handling and processing. Items Committee on Agricultural Engineering may be required to function independently or Services of the Canadian Agricultural Services as components of a system. The design of a Coordinating Committee. HANDLING AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS INTRODUCTION The financial viability of farms depends, to a great extent, on how producers maintain the quantity and quality of crops — from harvest to the time the crops are sold to market or fed to livestock. Grain that is free from insects and mold is more valuable than out-of-condition grain. Loss of dry matter or available nutrients from improperly stored forage means that greater production is necessary to achieve the same quantity of output in terms of meat, milk, or other products. Canada enjoys relatively favorable climatic conditions for storing grain and forage crops. Therefore producers here find it easier to maintain crop quality than do farmers in more temperate climates. Nonetheless, losses in storage can affect the net income of Canadian producers, so it is worthwhile to control crop storage conditions. Storage systems operate under a wide range of variables including the weather, crop type, moisture content, product utilization or marketing scenario, and power availability. Use this manual to identify these variables in developing storage facilities. l.i Maintaining the quality of grain in storage Deterioration of grain in storage generally results from infestation by: • rodents • insects and mites • fungus and molds Control infestations by limiting access to food and water supplies. Construct storage buildings to prevent rodent entry. Use concrete floors and curbs under buildings and steel kick plates around the bottom joists of wood-frame buildings. As well, repair leaking faucets and insulate sweating pipes to prevent water from collecting in open pools. Clean bins between fills to remove the out-of- condition grain that attracts rodents. Old grain also harbors insects and mold that may contaminate the bin. In cleaning the bin, spray insecticide where insects can hide, for example, in aeration ducts, wall-to-floor joints, and panel-interconnection seams. Clean grain spills outside the bins to discour- age rodents, insects, and molds from populat- ing. Cleanliness is especially important in summer when insects are very mobile and mold spores are readily transported in the warm wind. Both pests can contaminate storage facilities in their vicinities. 1.2 Controlling rodents, insects, and molds 1.3 Moisture control Insects and molds can survive in dry grain but require moisture to propagate. Grain that becomes tough or damp in storage, however, is a prime target for infestation. Prevent moisture from collecting in the grain mass and block access of free water into the bin. Natural convection within the bin concentrates moisture within the grain mass. Temperature gradients between the interior and exterior of the bin promote convection currents. Mix and redistribute the grain mass. Use aeration equipment or turn the grain by unloading the bin, then by reloading the grain into the same or a different bin. These actions prevent large temperature gradients from generating convection currents. Moisture migration patterns vary seasonally, as Fig. 1 illustrates. Good design and maintenance of the granary prevents free moisture from building up in the grain mass. Close the inspection and access hatches, ensure waterproof connections of bins to their foundations, and provide weather seals where the bins connect roofs to the walls, to prevent access of snow. Other moisture-control strategies involve using a vapor barrier under concrete bin floors and installing high-density concrete. Both these measures prevent moisture from migrating through the floor. To alleviate a floor moisture problem that already exists, insert a granular (nonwicking) material below the bin floor and raise the bin floor above adjacent grade. Natural-air drying of grain can often cause water to condense on the underside of steel bin roofs during cool nights. This moisture can run down the underside of the roof to drip points, usually around the periphery, causing moisture to concentrate in the grain. Use relief air openings in the roof to reduce this condensation problem. In difficult cases, supplement this venting with positive overventilation of the air space above the grain: exhaust air from the space faster than the air moves through the grain. Insulating the roof may also help. 1.4 Temperature control The ability of insects and molds to propagate depends on grain temperature. Grain harvested on warm days is particularly susceptible to insect infestations and to mold formation, especially when adequate moisture is available. Reduce the HANDLING AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS Warm air High moisture zone \\\ Cold |^j Cold |kw Air releases moisture Fig. 1. Seasonal moisture migration patterns in (A) spring and summer, (B) fall and winter. temperature of the grain to below 5°C as quickly as possible after harvest to prevent insect and mold growth. This action also reduces the temperature differential between the grain mass and the outside air which, in turn, limits natural convection currents. Monitor grain temperature frequently to detect grain spoilage. Dry grain stored at a uniform temperature below 5°C does not deteriorate in storage. 1.5 Chemical control Pesticides also control rodents and insects. Two Agriculture Canada publications provide detailed information on selecting and using pesticides (Loschiavo 1976, Control of rats and mice 1979, Cessna 1988). Using chemicals to control insects and mold presents a risk to the health of the user as well as to children, livestock, and pets. Limit the use of chemicals to situations where an infestation has developed and the grain has begun to lose quality. Use of advice in this manual, however, should help avoid either situation. EFFECTS OF MOISTURE, TEMPERATURE, AND TIME ON GRAIN STORAGE 2.1 Moisture and temperature The optimum conditions for reproduction and growth vary with each species of insect, mite, or mold. However, some generalizations can be made for pests that affect grain in storage. Table 1 presents the environmental conditions recommended for stored grain to prevent total loss (by other than chemical means). Table 1 Environmental conditions associated with pests in grain storage Insects Mites Molds Minimum temperature for reproduction 17°C 5°C — Minimum grain moisture content for reproduction dry dry tough Minimum temperature for activity 8°C 3°C -8°C Source: Sinha (1971), Loschiavo (1976). Similarly, each species of grain exhibits a different ability to withstand storage conditions without loss, germination, or mold growth. Grains achieve stable storage moisture content when the relative humidity in the space between the kernels is less than the threshold humidity level for mold propagation. Table 2 lists moisture content designations for several grains. To enhance the storage life of grain, control both the grain temperature and the moisture content. Figs. 2, 3, and 4 illustrate the length of time that grains at various moisture contents and temperatures can be stored. As the temperature rises in heating grain, however, the rate of mold growth and insect infestation also increases to cause an exponential rate of temperature rise. In addition, storage without airflow causes a faster rate of decay and temperature rise than might be expected. Fig. 3 reflects storage of canola that is continuously ventilated. STORAGE AND CONDITIONING Table 2 Moisture content designations for common species of grain Species Dry % of weight Tough Damp Wheat Barley Oats Rye Flax Canola Buckwheat Corn Peas Sunflowers Mustard Canary seed Soybeans Lentils Triticale White beans 14.5 14.8 14.0 14.0 10.5 10.0 16.0 15.5 16.0 9.5 10.5 12.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 18.0 14.6-17.0 14.9-17.0 14.1-17.0 14.1-17.0 10.6-13.5 10.1-12.5 16.1-18.0 15.6-17.5 16.1-18.0 9.6-13.5 10.6-12.5 14.1-16.0 14.1-16.0 14.1-17.0 18.1-21.5 >17.0 >17.0 >17.0 >17.0 >13.5 >12.5 >18.0 17.6- -21.0 >18.0 13.6- ■17.0 >12.5 16.1- ■18.0 >16.0 >17.0 >21.5 Note: Canola is considered safe for storage over winter at 8.5% moisture content. Other grains are considered safe for storage when they are dry. Source: Grain grading handbook for western Canada. 30 \ \ \ \ \\. Will keep \ \ \ \ ^\ ^^X. 3-5 days 25 \ \ \ \ \v ^"\^ without drying O \ \ \ \ n. ^^\^ e \ \ \ \ \ ^\ *^\M \ \ *h \ * \ o 15 c 'to \ o*\ •£-> \ vo \ \o-\x>\ * \ CD 10 \ \ 9l. \ O \ \ \ \ ***** \ VO \ X \ \ \ *» \ \ Safe \ \ \ \ Nv storage \. N. \. N. N. 5 i i i i i i i i i i i 14 16 18 20 22 Moisture content. % 24 Fig. 2. Effect of temperature and moisture content on the allowable storage time for wheat, oats, and barley. Localized pockets of excess moisture in otherwise dry grain can result from insect infestation, concentrations of immature kernels, or moisture migration. Activity in these pockets generates heat in what is thought to be dry, cool grain. Whenever possible, reduce the temperature of the grain mass below 5°C. Alternatively, reduce the moisture content of the grain mass to prevent insect or mite infestation, which can cause the temperature of the grain to rise (Table 1; Figs. 2, 3, and 4). 10 15 Moisture content, % 20 Fig. 3. Effect of temperature and moisture content on the allowable storage time for continuously ventilated canola. Because insects and mites reproduce rapidly, cool grain as soon as possible after harvest, especially on warm days when the ambient temperature reaches 15°C or more. Grain does not cool quickly in storage without air flow and retains the harvest temperature for long periods. HANDLING AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS 18 20 22 24 26 Moisture content, % 28 30 2.2 Fig. 4. Effect of temperature and moisture content on the allowable storage time for corn. In summary, these factors predispose grain to spoilage: • presence of immature kernels • presence of mature grain having a higher moisture content than average • presence of grain containing above-average quantities of damaged kernels and fine 2.3 material Immature kernels have a higher moisture content and a higher heat of respiration than mature kernels. Prevent pockets of immature grain from forming in storage bins by turning the grain. In addition, use a grain spreader during bin filling and satisfy appropriate moisture and temperature conditions. Rewetting the grain, poor drying procedures, or moisture transfer within the bin can cause pockets of moist grain to form. Use control procedures similar to those for dealing with immature grain pockets. Insects readily attack damaged kernels and fine grain because the feedstock inside the kernels is easily accessible. These damaged kernels and fines, called dockage, are also more difficult to cool because of their high airflow resistance. Turn the grain in storage and use a grain spreader during filling to distribute the dockage uniformly. Check the bin-loading method to avoid creating the same problem during turning. Filling devices often fail to distribute particles uniformly. However, if uniform distribution of this material in the bin is impossible, clean the grain to remove excessive dockage. Equilibrium moisture content The equili- brium moisture content of grain occurs when the partial pressure of the water vapor in the grain equals the partial pressure of the water vapor in the air. The relative humidity (RH) of the air at equilibrium with material of a given moisture content is known as the equilibrium relative humidity. Grain gives up moisture to air (i.e., dries) when the relative humidity of the air is less than the equilibrium relative humidity. Conversely, grain takes on moisture if the relative humidity of the air exceeds the equilibrium relative humidity. The point of equilibrium varies with temperature and grain type. When moving ambient air through grain, the grain either gives up moisture to the air, or takes it from the air, depending on the relative humidity of the air, moisture content of the grain, and temperature of both air and grain. Fig. 5 illustrates two important notes about drying grain. As the grain dries, the drying rate slows significantly once the vapor pressures of the air and the grain begin to equalize. In addition, the ability of ambient air to dry grain declines as temperatures decrease. Consequently, the potential for removing moisture from grain by ambient air relates directly to the net evaporation in any given geographical area. Determining moisture content For quick moist- ure content determinations, rely on electrical resistance testers. Use testers that demon- strate good accuracy for most grains over a wide range of moisture contents. Remember to recalibrate the electrical resistance testers, however, for each type of material. When using a heated-air grain dryer, allow for the moisture rebound effect that occurs as the moisture in the grain restabilizes after a period of drying. Moisture rebound results because the moisture tester measures only the moisture in the surface layers of the kernels. These layers dry much faster than does the centre of the kernel. Thus, the tester reflects a low moisture reading immediately after drying. Moisture rebound is negligible when only a small amount of moisture is removed from the grain. However, rebound frequently reaches 1-1.5% when 10% or more of the moisture in the grain must be removed. To accommodate moisture rebound and accurately measure the moisture content, allow the grain to reach temperature equilibrium throughout the kernels before using the moisture tester. Another way of overcoming the problem of moisture rebound is to overdry the grain by about 1%. Alternatively, before testing the sample for moisture content, grind it, seal it in a plastic bag to prevent moisture loss, and allow it to cool to ambient temperature. 10 STORAGE AND CONDITIONING 20 C CD cereals at25°C O cereals at 10°C □ oilseeds at 10° C A oilseeds at 25 °C 60 70 Relative humidity of the air Fig. 5. Equilibrium moisture content of cereal grains and oilseeds. 80 Several publications from the American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE) offer standard methods for determining the moisture content of grains, seeds, and forages. In fact, the accuracy of all types of moisture testers are measured against the ASAE oven dryers. 2.4 Temperature -monitoring devices Monitoring temperature is the easiest and most convenient means of checking the condition of stored grain. Temperature measurements indicate whether any heating is taking place or whether the propagation of insects and mites threatens the quality of the grain mass. Minor increases in temperature indicate a need for closer examination. Maintain good records of temperatures so that even minor temperature changes can be detected and evaluated. Locate temperature sensors in at least three places within the grain to adequately reflect the temperature of the storage mass. Good locations in the storage bin include the top centre (0.5-1 m below the surface), bottom centre (0.5-1 m above the floor), and on the south side (half-way up the bin about 0.1-0.5 m from the exterior wall). Because moisture migrates within the bin, the top and bottom centre locations are most susceptible to moisture accumulation from internal convection. Monitoring the temperature differential from the outside to the centre reflects changing temperatures within the grain mass and provides an early clue to the presence of moisture within the grain. Uniform temperature throughout the storage mass ensures the best storage conditions. The most common temperature-sensing devices include thermocouples, thermistors, and gas- filled thermometers. Thermocouples and thermistors are relatively low-cost sensors but they require high-cost meters to interpret the signals. Gas-filled thermometers are often low- HANDLING AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS 11 cost devices but function best as probes or when in fixed locations. Use thermocouples or thermistors when several bins must be monitored on a regular basis. These devices can remain enclosed in the bins since they generate temperature signals to exterior meters. Equip all bins over 300 m3 with devices to monitor temperature. However, bins of any size can benefit from temperature-monitoring equipment, particularly if the stored grain is tough or is susceptible to heating, such as canola. 2.5 Time Time of storage is the most frequently underutilized factor in alleviating grain storage problems. Design storage systems to handle wide-ranging demands for time variability. With the appropriate system, an operator can take advantage of the time variable and use it to economic advantage. Consider the scenario involving a harvest of No. 2 wheat at 18% moisture content on 5 September. The operator faces these questions: • Should the grain be dried? 31 • Should the grain be cooled for possible sale as No. 2 tough? • Should the grain be cooled for future sale as feed wheat? • Should the grain be cooled for future con- sumption by the operator's own livestock? • Should the wheat dry in the field prior to harvest? In this case it may no longer be No. 2. The operator can only answer these questions with a full knowledge of the following: • grain stocks available • feed requirements • tax position • market conditions • risk-taking ability The design of the storage facility should not add additional constraints. SYSTEMS TO CONTROL MOISTURE AND TEMPERATURE Air moving through the grain mass controls its moisture content and temperature. The necessary quantity, temperature, and humidity of the air depend on the objectives of the drying operation. The four basic systems for drying grain are • aeration • natural-air drying • heated-air drying • combination drying Aeration maintains the quality of dry grain and eliminates temperature and moisture differences throughout the bin. Natural-air (or unheated-air) drying dries grain using ambient air. This process removes limited quantities of excess moisture. Heated-air drying dries grain using supplementary heat. Adding heat to the drying air increases the vapor pressure differential between the grain and the air and reduces drying time. Combination drying uses aeration, natural-air, or heated-air drying to dry the grain. Such methods are normally referred to as dryera- tion, cooleration, and modified cooleration. Use them during cooling to remove the last 1-6% of moisture from the grain. Aeration systems Use aeration to • cool dry grain for storage at the lowest practical temperature • establish and maintain temperature and moisture uniformity throughout the grain mass Aerating grain in storage requires a minimum airflow of 1 (L/s)/m3. At this rate, grain cools uniformly to near ambient temperature within 150-200 h. It cools in half this time with double the rate of airflow. Airflow rates above the minimum recommendations increase storage options. Aerate at 2-6 (L/s) per cubic metre of grain to reduce the fan-operation time. At this rate, the grain cools well and attains uniform temperature. At the same time, aeration reduces the risk of moisture accumulating in the stored tough grain. The ideal grain temperature is within 5°C of the average ambient temperature. Realistically, however, maintain grain below 5°C during winter and rewarm it to 10°C in the spring. Monitor the grain temperature in the bin to determine temperature uniformity within the grain mass. If temperature differentials develop, moisture may migrate within the bin 12 STORAGE AND CONDITIONING and reduce the safe storage time. Adequate fan operation times ensure uniform temperatures. Moisture migration within a storage bin causes liquid to deposit in the top centre of a bin during winter and the bottom centre during summer. Monitor these locations frequently. Since it is relatively inaccessible, the bottom centre of the bin can be effectively monitored only by measuring the temperature. Aerating the bottom of the storage bin, however, makes it less important to monitor the bottom of the bin. Do not expect aeration to dry tough grain, although under ideal conditions some moisture may be removed. Avoid overdrying the grain, which reduces the amount of marketable product. Taking advantage of increased airflow rates, faster cooling, or holding tough grain requires that the aeration system be properly designed and that the operator understand the influence of ambient conditions on the ability of grains to be stored. 3.2 Fan operation During harvest, the primary objective is to cool the grain. Operate the fan continuously while filling a bin and afterward for as long as the exhaust air temperature measures 5°C above the maximum daily temperature. Cooling the grain to below 5°C generally requires several periods of continuous fan operation as the ambient temperature decreases. Ignore the relative humidity of the ambient air when the grain is cooling. Continue operating the fan, even during wet weather, because cooling the grain is much more important than any rewetting that may take place. Operate the fan for a day or two after the wet weather to remove excess humidity from the storage bin. The top centre of the bin cools last if air moves upward through the bin. With a downward airflow, the bottom centre cools last. Cooling is complete when the temperature of these locations reaches 5°C or lower. During the winter, maintain uniform tempera- tures by operating the aeration fan 1 or 2 days when the ambient temperature approaches that of the grain in storage. Extreme cold reduces the temperature uniformity in the bin and increases the tendency for moisture migration. Winter cold also causes condensa- tion to occur on grain near the air ducts. When the fan is not operating, keep a cover over the aeration fan or duct. This cover • prevents the grain near the duct from cooling excessively because of severe winter conditions • prevents rain or snow from entering the bin • reduces the accessibility of the bin to rodents Rewarm the grain in the spring, especially if the grain is to be stored through the summer and if the grain temperature measures 0°C or less. Begin warming in the spring when average daily ambient temperature reaches 5°C above the grain temperature. Warm in several stages, eventually bringing the temperature to 10°C, and select periods when the relative humidity is below 70%. Warming under these conditions reduces the risk of condensation forming on the grain and rewetting if the grain absorbs the moisture. Operate the fan continuously during rewarming to ensure the temperature remains uniform in the bin. Condensation and spoilage may occur within a few days if the fan is shut off prior to grain achieving uniform temperature. During the summer, take advantage of fair weather when the temperature dips to 15°C or lower to reestablish temperature uniformity. Do not run the fan when the ambient temperature is above the grain temperature, except to complete the period necessary to establish temperature uniformity. 3.3 Direction of airflow The decision to direct the air through the grain — from top to bottom, or the reverse — depends on several factors. Use the following information to decide which method to use in designing airflow drying systems. Exhausting air through the bottom of the storage bin has one important advantage. It eliminates condensation on the underside of the roof while cooling warm grain during cold weather. On the negative side, however, exhausting air through the bottom of the bin can cause moisture to accumulate at the bottom centre of the bin where accessibility for quality monitoring is most difficult. To avoid this situation, fix a temperature sensor in the spoilage location and periodically remove a small quantity of grain from the bottom centre of the bin to monitor for potential spoilage. Additionally, exhausting air through the bottom poses a problem since it rewarms cooled grain at the bottom of the bin if warm grain is added at the top or if solar heat gain raises the air temperature under the bin roof during cooling. Exhausting air at the top of the storage bin has four important advantages. It offers easy access to check the condition of the area most susceptible to spoilage (the top centre). It also simplifies temperature measurement to determine when aeration is complete. HANDLING AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS 13 Air exhausting at the top of the bin helps in keeping perforations clean during bin filling, especially when the fan begins operating prior to filling. And finally, it prevents the solar heat gain from the roof and space above the grain in storage from warming the grain in storage, a particular advantage during spring and summer. As a disadvantage, though, exhaust air exiting the bin through the top may allow condensation forming on the bin roof to drip onto the grain. 3.4 Natural-air drying Unheated ambient air can dry stored grain provided the equilibrium relative humidity corresponding to the moisture content of the grain exceeds the relative humidity of the ambient air. The drying rate must surpass the rate at which spoilage develops. The drying rate increases with increasing ambient temperature, but remember, this change in conditions also promotes spoilage. On the other hand, the equilibrium moisture content increases as the grain temperature decreases, further restricting the drying rate already reduced by the lower enthalpy of cooler air. 3.5 Design and operation Air forced through grain in storage first dries the grain it initially contacts. As it passes through the grain it takes on moisture until it reaches the equilibrium relative humidity, which corresponds to the moisture content of the wet grain. Subsequently, the air passes through the remaining grain with essentially no drying effect. The depth of grain that correlates with the moisture uptake by air is known as the drying zone. The thickness and rate of travel of the drying zone varies with the airflow rate, ambient conditions, and the moisture content of the grain. To prevent spoilage, the drying zone must pass through the entire grain mass within the allowable storage time. Natural-air drying, then, is a race to dry the grain before it spoils. Normally, a fan blows the air upward through the bin so the top layer of grain dries last. During drying, closely monitor the grain in this location to detect any signs of heating and to determine when a drying zone has moved through. If the grain begins to heat, remove it to a heated-air dryer as quickly as possible to reduce the chances of spoilage. In a natural-air drying system the operator can control only the rate of airflow. Higher airflow rates move a wider drying zone through the grain faster. A drying zone, once developed, moves through grain as long as the fan operates. Therefore, operate the fan continuously until the zone has moved through the entire grain mass, or until the grain reaches a temperature for safe storage. Expect grain nearest the air supply to overdry during good weather and rewet during adverse conditions. Continue operating the fan until either the grain dries or it reaches a safe storage temperature (see Figs. 2, 3, and 4). Store cereal grains and corn at 15-18% moisture content and at temperatures from 0 to — 5°C. No further drying is required if the grain is to be used as feed during the winter. Otherwise completely dry the grain or corn by operating the fan continuously during the spring as soon as ambient temperature permits. Moisture removal proceeds quickly in the spring when ambient conditions normally favor drying. 3.6 Airflow rate Select airflow rates depending on: • grain type and moisture content • date of harvest • normal autumn weather conditions for the area Tables 3-8 list airflow rates for a variety of conditions. 3.7 Operational aids Several factors can influence the efficiency of grain drying. First, the concentration of fines and broken material can have a significant detrimental effect on airflow. Reduce this effect by removing some of the grain through the centre unloading port after filling the storage bin. Alternatively, use a grain spreader during filling. Hand leveling the grain surface may also encourage uniform airflow through the bin. Start the fan as soon as there is enough load on the perforated area of the bin floor to prevent uplifting. Continue operating the fan until the grain is dry or cool enough to prevent spoilage. During storage, monitor the temperature and moisture content of the grain in at least the top metre of the bin. During the winter, operate the fan for 6-8 h if the ambient temperature rises or following periods when the ambient temperature exceeds 0°C. Finally, use the fan in the spring to rewarm dry grain to 10°C, especially when storing the grain past the end of June. 14 STORAGE AND CONDITIONING Table 3 Recommended minimum airflow for a storage bin with a fully perforated floor and a level grain surface in Manitoba Crop and % time harvest Dry dried date date in fall Initial moisture content (%) 16 17 18 19 20 22 24 26 28 Airflow (L/s-m3) Seed wheat 15 August Fall 100 9 9 10 15 27 ** 97 6 7 10* 15 27 ** 94 6 6 10* 15* 27* ** 90 5 5 10* 15* 27* ** Spring 6 7 10 15 27 ** % time 97 97 100 100 100 ** dried in fall 1 September Fall 100 10 11 12 13 17 40 97 8 10 10 13* 17 40 94 7 9 10 13* 17 40* 90 7 8 9 13* 17 40* Spring 7 8 8 13 17 40 % time 94 91 88 100 100 100 dried in fall 15 September Fall 100 19 23 28 30 32 37 97 17 22 23 24 25 27 94 13 13 16 17 20 27 90 10 12 15 16 17 26 Spring 8 8 8 8 14 26 % time 76 73 52 33 82 88 dried in fall 1 October Spring 8 8 8 9 13 23 % time 33 15 3 3 39 61 dried in fall 15 October Spring 8 8 8 11 15 24 %time 0 0 0 3 9 30 dried in fall Commercial wheat 15 August Fall 100 9 9 10 10 17 34 97 6 7 8 9 17* 34* 94 5 6 7 9* 17* 34* 90 5 5 6 9* 17* 34* Spring 6 6 7 9 17 34 % time 97 94 94 97 100 100 dried in fall (continued) HANDLING AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS 15 Table 3 Recommended minimum airflow for a storage bin with a fully perforated floor and a level grain surface in Manitoba {continued) Crop and harvest date % time Dry dried date in fall 16 Initial moisture content (%) 17 18 19 20 22 24 26 28 Airflow (L/s-m3) 1 September 15 September 1 October 15 October Barley 15 August 1 September Fall 100 10 11 12 13 15 21 97 8 10 10 12 13 21 94 7 9 10 11 13* 21 90 7 8 9 10 13* 21* Spring 7 8 8 8 13 21 % time 94 91 88 76 97 100 dried in fall Fall 100 19 23 28 30 32 37 97 17 22 23 24 25 27 94 13 13 16 17 20 27 90 10 12 15 16 17 26 Spring 8 8 8 8 9 18 % time 76 73 52 33 15 88 dried in fall Spring 8 8 8 8 8 15 % time 33 15 3 3 0 48 dried in fall Spring 8 8 8 8 8 16 % time 3 0 0 0 0 0 dried in fall Fall 100 16 16 18 40 97 9 — 12 — 18* 40* 94 8 — 10 — 18* 40* 90 7 — 9 — 18* 40* Spring 7 — 9 — 18 40 % time 88 — 88 — 100 100 dried in fall Fall 100 19 19 _^_ 24 30 97 16 — 19 — 19 27 94 14 — 17 — 18 27 90 13 — 16 — 17 27* Spring 13 — 13 — 13 27 % time 91 — 85 — 85 97 dried in fall (continued) 16 STORAGE AND CONDITIONING Table 3 Recommended minimum airflow for a storage bin with a fully perforated floor and a level grain surface in Manitoba (concluded) Crop and harvest date %time Dry dried — date in fall 16 17 Initial moisture content (%) 18 19 20 22 24 26 28 Airflow (L/s-m3) 15 September Fall 100 35 - 45 50 ** 97 29 39 45 47 94 24 30 31 37 90 20 25 30 35 Spring 13 13 13 17 % time 73 64 45 55 dried in fall 1 October Spring 13 13 13 17 % time 45 24 6 15 dried in fall Cornt 15 September 1 October 15 October 1 November 10 — 29 — 117 8 — 22 — 49 8 13 20 25 52 8 — 12 — 20 Lower airflows are possible for this condition, but a risk of spoilage would be introduced. See your local agricultural engineer for details. Airflow rates would be excessive for this condition. Data are based on computerized drying simulations using Winnipeg weather data for the years 1961-1970. The final moisture content was 15.5%. The airflow rates given would complete drying in the spring following the harvest year. 3.8 General discussion Natural-air drying sys- tems usually provide 10-30 (L/s) of air for each cubic metre of grain. This rate is sufficient to dry tough grain, or at least store it through the winter. It may even be suitable for damp grain. However, this sort of drying system demands attention from a knowledgeable operator. Drying systems using natural air usually require less capital investment and less materials-handling equipment than do heated- air dryers. Natural-air drying systems also consume less energy than any other means of drying. This fact is especially notable in areas having a low relative humidity in the autumn and where only small amounts of moisture are removed from the grains. In fact, natural-air systems work particularly well in areas with low relative humidity during the autumn. In such locations, though, pay attention to controlling the costs associated with overdrying; they can be significant. In areas where the ambient relative humidity approximates the equilibrium humidity levels for dry grain, energy costs escalate rapidly. Systems in these areas require high airflow rates to prevent spoilage and extended fan operation to remove the moisture. In designing natural-air drying systems use wide and short bins. For economical opera- tion, select a fan that maintains static pressure as low as possible. These fans are particu- larly necessary in facilities storing small-seed crops (e.g. flax, canola) because pressure loss through grain increases considerably with grain depth and air speed. This configuration of bin and fan reduces the cost of the bin marginally; however, it increases the cost of the foundation and perforated floor. 3.9 Heated-air drying As grain dries it releases moisture to the air at a rate dictated by two factors: the difference between the partial pressure of water vapor (VPD) between the kernels and the air, and the permeability of the kernels. Excessive VPD causes physical damage. HANDLING AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS 17 Table 4 Recommended airflow for natural-air drying of wheat in Edmonton, Alta. Harvest date Year Initial moisture content (%) 16 18 20 22 24 2nd worst Worst Airflow (L/s-m3) 15 August — 5.0 6.3 20.0 22.5 35.0 41.3 — 1 September 2nd worst Worst — 4.4 4.4 12.5 16.3 28.8 28.8 — 15 September 2nd worst Worst 2.5 2.5 3.8 4.4 7.5 7.5 17.5 18.8 40.0 41.3 1 October 2nd worst Worst — 3.8 4.4 6.3 6.3 10.0 11.3 — 15 October 2nd worst Worst — 3.8 4.4 5.6 5.6 8.8 8.8 — The data in this table are based on simulated drying results for the years 1967-1976. Table 5 Recommended airflow for natural-air drying of wheat in Swift Current, Sask. Harvest date Year Initial moisture content (%) 16 18 20 22 24 2nd worst Worst Airflow (L/s-m3) 15 August — 5.0 5.0 13.8 15.0 26.3 35.0 — 1 September 2nd worst Worst — 5.0 5.6 11.3 12.5 21.3 25.0 — 15 September 2nd worst Worst 2.5 3.1 3.8 4.4 8.8 11.3 17.5 18.8 33.8 35.0 1 October 2nd worst Worst — 3.8 4.4 7.5 7.5 12.5 15.0 — 15 October 2nd worst Worst — 3.8 4.4 6.3 6.3 10.0 11.3 — The data in this table are based on simulated drying results for the years 1960-1974. 18 STORAGE AND CONDITIONING Table 6 Recommended airflow for natural-air drying of wheat in London, Ont. Harvest date Year Initial moisture content (%) 20 22 24 26 28 2nd worst Worst Airflow (L/s-m3) 15 September 21.0 26.8 35.0 51.3 69.0 72.3 113.0 128.0 175.0 187.0 1 October 2nd worst Worst 11.7 15.2 25.6 30.3 49.0 66.5 87.5 128.0 111.0 163.0 15 September 2nd worst Worst 7.7 11.7 17.5 24.5 39.6 73.5 70.0 128.0 140.0 152.0 1 November 2nd worst Worst 8.2 9.3 12.8 12.8 21.0 23.3 40.8 42.0 67.5 80.5 15 November 2nd worst Worst 8.2 8.2 7.7 7.7 15.2 16.3 22.1 26.8 39.6 45.5 The data in this table are based on simulated drying results for the years 1962-1973. Table 7 Predicted minimum airflow for drying canola in Manitoba Harvest date % time Dry dried date in fall 10 Initial moisture content (%) 11 12 13 14 15 Airflow (L/s-m3) 15 August 1 September 15 September 1 October Fall 100 16 97 13 94 10 90 7 Spring 7 % time 88 dried in fall Fall 100 26 97 19 94 13 90 13 Spring 12 % time 85 dried in fall Spring 12 % time 55 dried in fall Spring 12 % time 24 dried in fall 16 16 16 17 28 13 13 13 15 28* 10 11 13* 15* 28* 8 9 13* 15* 28* 7 7 13 15 28 85 76 97 97 100 26 26 27 27 30 19 19 19 19 20 17 17 17 17 20* 14 15 16 17 20* 12 12 12 16 20 82 79 70 85 97 12 12 12 12 14 39 39 33 30 36 12 12 12 12 12 24 15 15 9 6 Lower airflows are possible for this condition, but a risk of spoilage would be introduced. See your local agricultural engineer for details. HANDLING AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS 19 Table 8 Effect of harvest date, climatic condition, and initial moisture content on airflow rates for low-temperature drying of corn in Toronto, Ont. Harvest date** Climatic condition (year) 1971 1972 1975 1969 1976 (poor) (good) Airflow (L/s-m3) 28.1 23.9 23.5 21.2 12.8 26.1 23.8 21.5 16.4 12.4 18.7 20.8 20.0 19.7 13.1 24.4 27.2 26.6 18.3 12.7 26.1 23.8 21.5 16.5 12.4 42.3* 25.3 28.1 21.8 18.9 46.1* 29.8 47.4* 28.9 21.2 1 October 15 October 1 November 15 November Initial moisture content (%)t 22 24 26 * These airflow rates may not be feasible unless a high-speed centrifugal fan or shallow depths of grain are used. ** Initial moisture content of 22%. t Harvest date 15 October. Source: Mittal and Otten (1982). During initial drying, the grain is still relatively cool and takes some time to warm, because of low thermal conductivity. As the grain dries, the moisture at or near the surface of the grain evaporates, which further controls the warming rate because the kernels lose heat to evaporation. As the grain approaches dry, the moisture near the surface depletes so the rate at which moisture can move from the centre of the kernel through the hull dictates the rate at which further drying can occur. The kernel permeability and the VPD affect how moisture moves through the grain. Rapid moisture removal from the surface of the kernel causes the exterior layers to overdry. Expect some overdrying in high-temperature drying; but excessively high temperatures and accelerated drying cause two compounding problems: • brittle hulls with lower-than-normal moisture permeability • high vapor pressure within the kernels Together these problems result in stress crack- ing of the grain hulls. They also lead to in- creased damage to the grain during handling. Tough grain normally dries before the grain temperature and internal vapor pressure reach levels likely to cause stress cracking. Damp or wet grain, on the other hand, is very sensitive to the drying rate. For wet grain, select a dryer or drying system that yields a slow drying rate, particularly for the final drying stages. Such a system substantially reduces damage to the grain, as well as limits the possibility for damage in handling. Rapid removal of moisture in the final drying stages requires a great deal of energy. Two factors account for the increase in energy demand. First, instead of drying the grain, the energy increases the sensible heat of the grain. Second, the slower release of moisture from grain that is almost dry results in exhaust air with a low relative humidity. The net effect is a lower dryer efficiency. Excessive grain temperature reduces the ability of the seeds to germinate. Both drying time and temperature are correlated; however, the short time involved in heated-air drying generally reduces its impact on the quality of the grain. 20 STORAGE AND CONDITIONING Extremely high temperatures cause the grain kernels to discolor and disfigure. Controlling the drying process to prevent these distortions, however, results in temperatures higher than required for complete drying. Consequently this approach proves an undesirable control strategy. Refer to the temperatures listed in Table 9 as a guide to safe air temperatures. However, do not overlook safe grain temperatures when planning grain-drying systems. Grain dryers vary in design and operation. They provide a wide range of conditions that affect the safe drying temperature. In particular, two aspects of dryer design most strongly influence safe drying temperature: • temperature uniformity in the supply air • moisture content uniformity in the grain being dried The design of the air supply system, the burner type, the shape of air plenum, and the mode of operation each affect the temperature of the supply air at different locations within a grain dryer. Temperature variations within a dryer generally remain constant for each type of grain, but change significantly from one grain to another because of changes in airflow rate. For grain with a nonuniform moisture content, the maximum temperature that the driest kernels can be exposed to without damage represents the safe drying temperature for that batch. A nonrecirculating batch dryer requires a lower safe drying temperature than a recirculating batch dryer. The difference occurs because in a nonrecirculating dryer the hottest, driest air continuously contacts the same kernels first throughout the drying process. Consequently these kernels overdry by the time the entire batch is dry. The temperatures given in Table 9 depend on drying to not more than 1% below dry (as designated in Table 2), and on removing not more than 6% of the moisture in one pass through a high-speed dryer. To remove more than 6% moisture on the first pass, the initial drying temperature can exceed the temperatures shown in Table 9 because evaporation cools the grain kernels during this drying stage. However, as the grain gets close to being dry, maintain the air temperature at the levels given in Table 9. Operate nonrecirculating batch dryers at 5-10°C below the temperatures indicated for commercial use, particularly when drying oilseeds. Prolonged exposure to high temperatures affects the oil quality in oilseed grains. Table 9 Maximum drying temperatures Maximum temperature (°C) Seed or Commercial Crop malting use Feed Wheat 60 65 80-100 Oats 50 60 80-100 Barley 45 55 80-100 Rye 45 60 80-100 Corn 45 60 90-100 Flax 45 80 80-100 Canola 45 65 — Peas 45 70 80-100 Mustard 45 60 — Sunflowers 45 50 — Buckwheat 45 45 — For damp grain (see Table 2), air temperatures 20°C above those given (Table 9) can be used safely in the early stages of drying. 3.10 Dryer types There are three main types of heated-air dryers: • nonrecirculating batch dryers, in which the grain remains static during drying and is then removed • recirculating batch dryers, in which the grain constantly mixes during drying • continuous flow dryers, in which the grain feeds into the dryer wet and exits dry on a continuous basis Each of these types can supplement round steel storage bins or exist as single-purpose machines. Select a dryer that permits drying in 24 h only the amount of grain normally harvested in a day. 3.11 Nonrecirculating batch dryers Wet grain is loaded into a batch dryer and heated air is passed through it until the average moisture content reaches the dry point. The grain then cools and is unloaded. Fig. 6 shows a sectional view of a nonrecirculating batch dryer. Since the grain remains stationary during drying, the grain closest to the hot air plenum dries before grain located further away. Achieving a dry average requires fairly severe overdrying of the interior grain. To avoid grain damage, reduce the operating temperature of the dryer during the final drying stages. 3.12 Batch bin dryers A batch bin dryer (Fig. 7) consists of a perforated floor, one or more fans and heat sources, plus controls to regulate temperature. Supplementary equipment often HANDLING AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS 21 ,<£f - :. *_Grain r \ / v; Air -" plenum i •. *\ :;:-:-V ■■■; y * Fig. 6. Nonrecirculating batch dryer. includes timers to aid in temperature regulation, a manometer to correlate grain depth with fan capacity, and a bin spreader to level the grain and to achieve more uniform distribution of fines and foreign material. Additionally, wet and dry grain surge bins reduce the time and supplementary equipment required to load and unload the dryer. A second bin dryer using the same heating device and fan as the primary dryer can function as a wet surge bin. An airflow diverter shares the heated air between the two bins. The airflow rate used in bin dryers varies widely. However, most systems operate at 125 (L/s) per cubic metre of grain. Increasing the airflow, either by increasing the fan capacity or decreasing the grain depth, dries the grain faster. Fan and heater Perforated drying floor Fig. 7. Batch bin dryer. Control condensation on the underside of the bin roof using techniques similar to those used for natural-air drying (see section 3.4). For all batch dryers, consider carefully the time required to load and unload the dryers and design a drying system to match the harvest system. Because of their high resistance to airflow, small-seeded crops like canola and flax greatly influence the choice of dryer and the design of the drying system. 3.13 Portable batch dryers The term portable describes batch dryers that are not the bin type. These portable dryers pose design constraints similar to batch and batch-bin dryers. Most notably, the grain nearest the plenum dries long before the rest of the batch. To avoid this problem, maintain the operating temperature for portable dryers lower than dryers that provide a greater degree of mixing. Portable batch dryers differ from bin dryers in two important ways. Portable batch dryers are generally smaller in volume and they have a higher airflow rate per unit volume than bin dryers. Together these characteristics reduce the time the grain must remain in the dryer. Yet at the same time they decrease fuel efficiency. Locate a wet surge bin ahead of the dryer and use it to top up the grain during drying. As it dries, the grain shrinks. Air escapes through the area above the grain at the top of the dryer, rather than passing uniformly through the entire grain mass. Avoid this problem by ensuring the dryer is full for drying. Batch dryers usually come with high-capacity unloading conveyors. These conveyors are designed to minimize unloading times and increase dryer capacity. Drying very wet grain in cold weather can be difficult with a stationary batch dryer. This situation is particularly relevant to small- seeded crops, which have a higher resistance to airflow. As the warm air moves through grain layers, it picks up moisture and cools very quickly. If the relative humidity exceeds the dew point of the grain temperature before leaving the grain mass, water condenses in the exterior layers of grain and results in a nearly impenetrable barrier in the grain column. Recirculating batch dryers (see section 3.14) and rack-type continuous-flow dryers (see section 3.15) can contend with such adverse conditions by constantly mixing the grain. Mixing leads to a more uniform grain moisture content throughout the grain mass being dried. 22 STORAGE AND CONDITIONING 3.14 Recirculating batch dryers Recirculating batch dryers (Figs. 8 and 9) continuously mix grain during drying. Mixing essentially eliminates most of the operational constraints associated with batch dryers. It allows high operating temperatures, thereby increasing the drying rate. As well, it removes the problem of severe overdrying of grain adjacent to the air plenum. Mixing also reduces airflow resistance; the grain moves continuously so larger batches can be dried. However, if the grain is very wet, the continuous recirculation may damage it. Depending on the type of dryer, two sorts of equipment generally recirculate grain. Bin dryers use stirring augers; portable dryers use vertical screws discharging at the top centre of Perforated floor Fig. 8. Recirculating batch bin dryer. Grain Fan the bin. Fig. 9 shows a portable recirculating batch dryer. Bin dryers, whether recirculating or not, generally rely on much lower airflow rates than other types of dryers. This trait makes bin dryers more fuel efficient. Yet, because of the lower airflow rates, the grain remains longer in the bin. 3.15 Continuous-flow dryers A variety of equipment allows bin dryers to dry grain on a continuous-flow basis. The most common — a tapered sweep auger — removes a layer of grain from the bottom of the drying bed and discharges it through a central hopper and unloading auger (Fig. 10). Generally, hot grain moves from the dryer to secondary cooling bins, although variations of this system permit cooling in the dryer as well. Portable continuous-flow dryers (Fig. 11) are generally either cross-flow or rack types. Grain loads at the top of the dryer and flows down in columns around the central air supply plenum to discharge at the bottom. A temperature sensor, located in the grain column near the bottom of the drying section, regulates the flow. The operator correlates the temperature of the grain with its moisture content. The grain cools in the lower portions of the dryer, just ahead of the discharge. Some dryer designs permit adjustment of the cooling-to- heating area to accommodate more readily conditions such as grain moisture, ambient temperature, and cooling method. As in stationary or portable batch dryers, cross- flow batch dryers rely on an airflow perpendicular to the grain column. Very little grain mixes in the grain column so it dries from the inside out. Rack — or parallel-flow — dryers (Fig. 12) direct the airflow through the grain parallel to the grain column. As a result, the temperature Hot-grain transfer auger Grain spreader^. Unloading auger Fig. 9. Portable recirculating batch dryer. Fig. 10. Perforated drying floor Continuous-flow in-bin dryer. HANDLING AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS 23 I. I «-4". <-+ = pressure drop across the grain = 146 Pa/m for barley with airflow of 37.6 (L/s)/m2 based on the data in Fig. 14 200 100 90 80 70 60 50 W 40 O < 30- 20 10 - 1 | i i l I i i M t 1 1 1 I 1 i in ? ' / / / / , / / / / / / / / / ' // / / - $ F- 15 10 5 i 4- 40 80 120 160 Time, h Fig. 20. Relationship of temperature and time to mold formation on high-moisture hay. Hay Dryer 2 m solid Primary distribution duct Hay Dryer HANDUNG AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS 47 REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING Anderson, P.M., et al. Harvesting practices and round bale losses. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Auiki, F.S.; Batchelder, D.G.; McLaughlin, G. 1979. Forage drying: conditioning rolls, feed rate, and number of passes. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 79-1039. Beard, J.T.; Arthur, J. H. 1985. Ventilation concepts for insect control in grain storage. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 85-3517. Borsum, J.C.; Bakker-Arkema, F.W.; Brook, R.C. 1982. Micro-computer control of continuous flow dryers. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 82-6006. Cervinka, V., et al. 1975. Calibration systems for grain moisture meters. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 75-5013. Cessna, A.J. 1988. Pesticide Safety. Agric. Can. Publ. 1825/E. Chang, C.S., et al. 1980. Bulk properties of corn as affected by multiple point grain spreaders. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 80-3061. Control of rats and mice. 1979. Ottawa, Ont.: Agric. Can. Publ. 1370. Duggal, A.K.; Muir, W.E.; Brooker, D.B. 1982. Sorption equilibrium moisture contents of wheat kernels and chaff. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Fairbanks, G.E.; Fransen, S.C.; Schrock, M.D. 1981. Machine made stacks compared with round bales. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 24(2):281. Farm drying of milling wheat. 1986. Newsletter of the Canadian Wheat Board, January. Canadian Grain Commission. Feldman, M.; Robertson, J. A.; Lievers, K.W. 1980. Drying and storage of chopped hay with hay tower. Canadian Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 80-220. Fraser, B.M.; Muir, W.E. 1978. Comparison of so- lar/natural air drying in Manitoba. University of Manitoba Agricultural Engineering. Friesen, O.; Huminicki, D.N. 1986. Grain aeration and unheated air drying. Agdex 732-1. Winnipeg, Man.: Manitoba Department of Agriculture. Friesen, O.H. 1984. Evaluation of air delivery sys- tems for grain bins, and air flow resistance characteristics. Canadian Society of Agricul- tural Engineers. Paper No. 84-210. Friesen, O.H. 1982. Heated air grain dryers. Agric. Can. Publ. 1700. Gorakhpurwalla, H.D.; McGinty, R.J.; Watson, C.A. 1975. Determining moisture content of grain using microwave energy for drying. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 20:314-325. Grain grading handbook for western Canada. 1984. Winnipeg, Man.: Canadian Grain Commission. Gunasekaran, S.; Shove, G.C. 1983. Optimum fan operation for low temperature grain drying. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 83-3012. Haque, E.; Foster, G.H.; Chung, D.S.; Lai, F.S. 1978. Static pressure drop across a bed of corn mixed with fines. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 21(5):997. Hellevang, K.J. 1982. Crop dryer fires while drying sunflower. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 82-3563. Huhnke, R.L.; Stevens, V.L. 1985. Large round bale wheat hay storage. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 85-1031. Hurburgh, C.R.; Paynter, L.M.; Schmitt, S.G.; Bern, C.J. 1985. Performance of farm-type moisture meters. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 85-3008. Jayas, D.S.; Sokhansanj, S. 1985. Resistance to airflow of rapeseed (canola). American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 85-3516. Kumar, A.; Muir, W.E. 1985. Air flow resistance of wheat and barley. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 85-3515. Loschiavo, S.R., editor and compiler. 1976. Insects and mites in farm-stored grain in the Prairie Provinces. Agric. Can. Publ. 1595. Mills, J.T. 1989. Spoilage and heating of stored agricultural products: prevention, detection, and control. Agric. Can. Publ. 1823/E. Mills, J.T. 1990. Protection of farm-stored grains and oilseeds from insects, mites, and molds. Agric. Can. Publ. 1851/E. Mittal, G.S.; Otten, L. 1982. Simulation of low - temperature corn drying. Can. Agric. Eng. 24(2):111-118. 48 STORAGE AND CONDITIONING Mittal, G.S.; Otten, L.; Brown, R.B. 1984. Farm scale test of a micro-computer controlled low temperature corn drying system. Can. Agric. Eng. 26(2):121-125. Muhlbauer, W., et al. 1982. Comparison of low- temperature wheat drying management procedures. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 82-3006. Okabe, T.; Huang, M.T.; Okamura, S. 1973. Mea- surement of grain moisture content by use of microwaves. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 18:59-66. Otten, L.; Brown, R.B. 1980. Comparison of a high temperature and a combination drying system. Canadian Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 80-102. Raisanen, W. 1979. Motorola microprocessor-based moisture tester. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 79-5029. Sankat, C.K.; Bilanski, W.K. 1980. Ammoniation of corn stover stacks to improve feed value. Can. Agric. Eng. 22:77-80. Savoie, P.; Marcoux, A. 1982. Technological choices in forage harvest and conservation. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 84-1525. Scott, D.W. 1980. Performance of grain dryers under actual field conditions. Canadian Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 80-103. Singh, D.; Sokhansanj, S.; Middleton, B. 1983. Dry- ing characteristics of wheat, barley and canola at low temperatures. American Society of Agri- cultural Engineers. Paper No. CNR 83-207. Sinha, R.N. 1971. Spoilage of farm-stored grain by molds, insects and mites in western Canada. Agric. Can. Publ. 1437. Sinha, R.N. 1985. Insect pests of flour mills, grain elevators, and feed mills and their control. Agric. Can. Publ. 1776/E. Sirohi, U.S.; Koegal, R.G.; Straub, R.J. 1983. Elec- trical treatments to increase forage drying rates. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 83-1528. Smith, P. A.; Sistler, F.E. 1983. A grain dryer moni- tor/controller. American Society of Agri- cultural Engineers. Paper No. 83-3031. Sokhansanj, S.; Zhijie, W.; Jayas, D.S.; Kameska, T. 1985. Equilibrium moisture of rapeseed at temperatures between 5-20°C. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 85-3512. Sokhansanj, S.; Bakker-Arkema, F.W. 1981. Waste heat recovery in grain dryers. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Stephens, L.E.; Foster, G.H. 1978. Bulk properties of wheat and grain sorghum as affected by mechanical grain spreader. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Stephens, L.E.; Foster, G.H. 1976. Grain bulk pro- perties as affected by mechanical spreaders. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Thorastic, J.H.; Lapp, H.M.; Madrid, F.J. Stored wheat insect responses to changes in their phy- sical environment. American Society of Agri- cultural Engineers. Paper No. NCR 85-503. Wasserrnan, J.D., et al. 1984. Heated air grain dry- er performance. Canadian Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 84-211. Watts, K.C., et al. 1984. Comparison of drying corn using sodium and calcium bentonite. Canadian Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 84-205. Wilcke, W.F.; Bern, C.J. 1984. Natural air corn dry- ing with stirring: I. Effects of stirring. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 84-3519. Wilcke, W.F.; Bern, C.J. 1984. Natural air corn dry- ing with stirring: II. Management. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 84-3520. Wishna, S. 1984. Development of performance stan- dards for grain moisture meters. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 84-6512. HANDLING AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS 49 !/if/2,A,mV/8'BUO 2*006 AG"'CULTurL"' 3 Qr,lICA^^o7{™ ^0?3 nnn?WA<'""5