Ww. G. FARLOW HARVARD BOTANI = At a meeting of the Botanical Department held Oct. 20, 1903, the following vote was passed: “Under the head of Harvard Botanical Memoirs it is proposed to include all quarto publications issuing from the Gray Herbarium, the Cryptogamic Herbarium, and the Botanical Laboratories of Harvard University, including theses presented for the degrees of Ph.D. and S.D. in Botany. Inasmuch as some of the future publications are likely to be continuations of subjects treated in quarto papers already published, it seemed desirable to begin the numbering of the Memoirs with the year 1880, the date of the first quarto publication of any member of the botanical staff at present connected with Harvard University.” At a meeting on Nov. 25, 1916, it was voted to dis- continue the series of Botanical Memoirs. In all, nine numbers have been issued, the titles of which are given below. . I. The Gymnosporangia or Cedar-Apples of the United States. By W. G. Farlow. Anniversary Memoirs, Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 1880. Pp. 38. Pls. 1 and 2. II. The Entomopthoreae of the United States. By Roland Thaxter. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., IV, No. 6. Pp. 133-201. Pls. 14-21. April, 1888. Il. The Flora of the Kurile Islands. By K. Miyabe. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 1V, No. 7. Pp. 203-275. Pl. 22. Feb. 1890. IV. A North American Anthurus: its Structure and Development. By Edward A. Burt. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., TI, No. 14. Pp. 487-505. Pls. 49 and 50. Oct. 1894. V. Contribution towards a Monograph of the Laboulbeniaceae. By Roland Thaxter. Mem. American Acad. of Arts and Sci. Boston. XII, No. 3. Pp. 189-429. Pls. 1-26. Presented May 8, 1895. Issued Oct. 14, 1896. VI. The Development, Structure, and Affinities of the Genus Equisetum. By Edward C. Jeffrey. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., V, No. 5. Pp. 155-190. Pls. 26-30. April, 1899. ee | VIL. : Comparative Anatomy and Phyllogeny of the Coni- ferales, Part I. The Genus Sequoia. By Edward C. Jeffrey. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., V, No. 10. Pp. 441-459. Pls. 68-71. Nov. 1903. : VIII. The Comparative Anatomy and Phyllogeny of the Coni- ferales, Part II. The Abietineae. By Edward C. Jeffrey. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., VI, No. 1. Pp. 1-37. Pls. 1-7. Jan. 1905. IX. Contributions towards a Monograph of the Laboulbeniaceae, Part II. By Roland Thaxter. Mem. American Acad. of Arts and Sct., XIII, No. 6. Pp. 219-469. Pls. 28-71. June, 1908. | th ConltenAs of HG rk rege 75,8559 nOs.1-o HARVARD BOTANICAL MEMOIRS Under the head of Harvard Botanical Memoirs it is proposed to include all quarto publications issuing from the Gray Herbarium, the Cryptogamic Herbarium, and the Botanical Laboratories of Harvard University, in- cluding theses presented for the degrees of Ph.D. and S.D. ia Botany. Inasmuch as some of the future publications are likely to be continuations of subjects treated in quarto papers already published, it seemed desirable to begin the numbering of the Memoirs with the year 1880, the date of the first quarto publication of any member of the botanical staff at present con- nected with Harvard University. I. The Gymnosporangia or Cedar-Apples of the United States. By W. G. Farlow. Anniversary Memoirs, Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 1880. Pp. 38. Pls. 1 and 2. The Entomopthoraceae of the United States. By Roland Thaxter. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 1V, No.6. Pp. 133-201. Pls. 14-21. April, 1888. The Flora of the Kurile Islands. By K. Miyabe. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., IV, No.7. Pp. 203-275. Pl. 22. Feb. 1890. A North American Anthurus: its Structure and Development. 3y Edward A. Burt. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., U1, No. 14. Pp. 487-505. Pls. 49 and 50. Oct. 1894. Contributions towards a Monograph of the Laboulbeniaceae. By Roland Thaxter. Mem. American Acad. of Arts and Sci. Boston. XII, No. 3. Pp. 189-420. Pls. 1-26. Presented May 8, 1895. Issued Oct. 14, 1896. The Development, Structure, and Affinities of the Genus Equisetum. By Edward C. Jeffrey. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., V, No.5. Pp. 155-190. Pls. 26-30. April, 1899. ans ; ae ys OLY 2k AN ta i a se , ee ee ge ae oe ee le a 4 v7 mob Fes = oe teh ; oa: OE eras oe Pyne. : ah a ons % ae M * , ‘Y OF NATURAL HISTORY; H ENTOMOPHTHOREA OF THE UNITED STATES. By ROLAND THAXTER. 1 4 “ «4. ts. % eo mV - pee A LISHED BY THE SOCIETY. - Aprin, 1888. - 9 ERTS n VI. Tur EntromoryTooreArE OF THE UNITED STATES. By Roxuanp THAXTER. : Tue material upon which the followmg account is based was accumulated, for the ~ most part, during the seasons of 1886-7, from several localities in New England and in a North Carolina, shiek were examined with such thoroughness as the limited time at my - disposal would allow. The New England material was chiefly collected at Kittery Point, Maine, the southernmost point in the state, and in the vicinity of Boston; while the remainder is the result of two weeks botanizing in the alpine and sub-alpine region of Mt. Washington, N. H. The more southern forms represent three principal localities a in or near the western portion of North Carolina. Of these Cullowhee, 2400 ft. above the sea, is the southernmost, having a flora of a distinctly southern type; while the two _ others, Cranberry (3250 ft.) and Burbank (KE. Tennessee, 3500 ft.), have a climate and ra not unlike that of the southern New England states. The eastern section of the tet States is thus fairly well represented a so far as the localities which have been : pended are concerned; yet it is scarcely necessary to remark that the forms obtained dur- & ng a few weeks’ sojourn in each locality, in the course of general botanizing, can repre- ~ sent only in a fr agmentary way the Hntomophthoreae of this section of the country. The im orms occurring in the more remote regions of North America are, moreover, as yet al- most wholly unknown; and, although my observations have served to increase the num- ber of American representatives from four previously recorded forms to the considerable af nun ber hereafter enumerated, it cannot be supposed that the record is other than very Ms m1 verfect. The present paper is therefore complete only in so far as I have endeavored te © combine my own observations with those of previous students of the group in this ~ country and in Europe. ___ For this purpose the literature of the subject has been consulted as far as has been : _ practicable, and a list of the papers that I have myself seen is appended to this memoir. ft should be understood, however, that this list is not intended as a complete record of that has been written upon the subject, and is merely given for convenience of refer- oe in the text. _ The Russian publications of Sorokin were kindly procured for me in St. Petersburg Ir. Charles Eliot, and for some knowledge of their contents I am indebted to Mr. Ivan Panin. For the privilege of examining the remaining papers, not contained in the Uni- _-versity libraries in Cambridge, together with other invaluable assistance, I am indebted 5 to Professor Farlow, in whose hor atory the microscopic work upon my paper has been for the most part done. To Miss Hapgood I owe certain extracts from the Polish of IRS BOSTON SOC. NAT. HIST., VOL, IV. 20 (133) ~ 134 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE Nowakowski, and I am also indebted to Professor Farlow, Messrs. C. V. Riley, L. O. Howard, Henry Edwards and A. F. Chatfield for several interesting specimens. To Mr. C. W. Woodworth and Prof. 8. W. Williston I also owe certain entomological de- terminations. The plants that are to be considered in the present paper belong to a class which, al- though made up of several groups differig widely from one another in their habit and affinities, is yet, by reason of a peculiarity common to all its members, possessed of a certain individuality of its own that renders it susceptible of a consideration apart from all other forms of plant life. This peculiarity, by reason of which the class is usually characterized as entomogenous or entomophytous, consists in an obligatory parasitism upon insects, which, although in some instances it exists without apparent injury to the insect host, is usually of such a nature as to cause its death; often resulting, especially among noxious insects, in widespread mortality. Although a few of the more common or conspicuous forms of entomophytous plants had attracted the notice of botanists even in the last century, it was not until within comparatively recent years that they began to be studied with any care, and the work of Robin! is the first contribution of importance on the subject. This work still remains, with two exceptions,” the only attempt that has been made to bring together all the known forms of insect parasites; but since its publication very important contributions have been made to our knowledge of the subject, through the medium of numerous scattered papers. My attention was first turned in this direction in the course of entomological studies on the life-histories of certain insects; in the course of which I was often greatly annoyed by losing large numbers of larvae and pupae through the agency of fungi. Haying by this means and from other sources accumulated a certain amount of material, it was my first intention to include in my paper all the entomogenous plants recorded from Amer- ica; yet, owing to the many difficulties presented by the ascomycetous forms, involving a careful study and comparison of more abundant material than I could command, as well as by reason of the considerable additions to our Entomophthoreae resulting from my observations, I have decided to confine myself for the present to the members of this family, trusting to a future opportunity of extending my paper in conformity with my original plan. In the meantime a brief summary of the more important groups may not be out of place in this connection, and will be a fitting introduction to the more detailed consideration of the Entomophthoreae which follows. Summary of entomogenous plants.— Although the spiders and myriapods are not ex- empt from the attack of peculiar vegetable parasites, the hexapod insects offer by far the greater number of instances of this nature. Among the seven orders of the latter class usually enumerated, the Neuroptera and Orthoptera are almost wholly free from such attack; and, until recently, the first named order was considered wholly exempt in this respect. Of the remaining orders the Lepidoptera and Diptera are apparently the great- est sufferers; while the Hemiptera, Coleoptera and Hymenoptera are about equally af- 1C, Robin, J. ¢. that are known to form the bases of fungoid parasites, 2Sorokin, 7. c., C, and Gray, G. R: Notices of insects London, 1858. . is at. ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 135 fected. Of the different stages of insects the imagines, larvae and pupae may all be parasitized, and in some instances a single parasite may attack all these stages in one or more species of the same or different orders; while in others it may confine itself to a single stage or species. Entomogenous plants may in a general way be referred to five principal groups: one including the bacterial forms which produce disease in insects; a second represented by certain entophytous algae; and three others all belonging to the fungi proper. The first mentioned group, represented by the Bacteria, is chiefly of interest from an economic, rather than from a botanical point of view, as the supposed cause of destruc- tive epidemics among useful as well as noxious insects. Instances of this kind are pre- sented by the disease known as flacherie so destructive to silk worms, and in affections of a similar nature in other insects, where the “active principle” has, in some cases, been traced to bacterial forms which have been considered sufficiently peculiar to receive distinctive names. ‘The systematic study of the group is necessarily one of great diffi- culty, and any opinion as to the validity of specific distinctions in such cases can only be formed by specialists in this department; but from a practical standpoint the existence of such affections promises to afford an important means of defence against noxious in- sects. The second group includes a small number of peculiar filamentous algae, represented by Enterobryus and its allies, that live attached to the digestive tracts of certain myriapods and coleopterous larvae. They are apparently nearly related to Oscillaria or Beggiatoa among the Protophytes; but, owing to insufficient observations upon them, their exact af- finities are unknown. ‘Their habit is probably one of commensalism, rather than of true parasitism; the partially digested food of the host being absorbed directly from the di- gestive tract.’ The fungoid parasites of insects are, as before mentioned, represented by three chief groups: the Entomophthoreae, the Laboulbeniaceae and the entomogenous forms which constitute the bulk of the genus Cordyceps. Since the first of these is to receive spe- cial consideration hereafter, it need only be said that its members are closely allied to the Mucorini among the Zygomycetes, and are entomogenous with few exceptions. The Laboulbeniaceae constitute a small group of very peculiar and minute forms which have been placed by DeBary among the doubtful Ascomycetes. Their parasitism is an external one, which apparently results in little if any inconvenience to the host; each individual being fixed by a pedicellate attachment to the legs, thorax or other portion of the affected insect. Several genera on Diptera, Coleoptera, ete., are described by Pey- ritsch? to whom we are principally indebted for our knowledge of the group, although the first genus of the family (Laboulbenca) was described and figured by Robin.? The single American representative thus far recorded has been described by Professor Peck as Appendicularia entomophila, n.g. et sp.* The pyrenomycetous genus Cordyceps affords by far the most conspicuous examples of entomogenous plants, many of which are of large size, or brightly colored, and have 1See Leidy, Smiths. Contr. to Knowledge, v, pp. 1-67 p. 227 (1873): 72, 1, p. 377 (1875), plates. (1853) and Robin 7. ¢., p. 395. 3]7.¢., p. 622, plates. ? Sitz. d. Akad. wiss. Wien., 64, 1, p. 441 (1871): 68, 1, 4 Peck, 38th Report, p. 95, with plate. 136 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE therefore received more attention from earlier botanists. Their imperfect or “ Jsaria” condition is familiar to all entomologists as a pest in breeding cages and puparia; al- though the ascigerous condition is usually of rare occurrence. They attack all orders of hexapod insects, larvae and pupae as well as imagines, and also certain spiders; often producing what is vulgarly known as a “vegetable sprout” several inches in length. A considerable number of American species are recorded; yet, owing to the lack of suffi- ciently well-marked microscopic characters, as well as to the scarcity of good material for study, the group presents many difficulties, as is usual in cases when too great re- liance has been placed upon gross characters as a means of specific distinction. In addition to the groups above mentioned there are several other isolated instances of entomogenous fungi, among which should be mentioned the so-called Botrytis Bas- stana which produces the disease known as Muscardine, so destructive to silk worms in Europe and apparently identical with a similar form occurring in this country. Facultative parasites of insects —In addition to the obligate parasites briefly enumer- ated above, insects are often subject to the attack of numerous small moulds and bacteria which are in no sense peculiar to them, although they may temporarily assume a habit which is practically that of a true parasite, entering the living host and causing its death. It seems also probable that one or two forms which are truly entomogenous are yet saprophytes, as in the case of a certain Cordyceps (C. armeniaca) presumably growing upon the remains of insects in the excrement of insectivorous birds, as well as the members of the genus Basidiobolus hereafter mentioned, which occur upon the excre- ment of frogs and lizards. DeBary has also pointed out that the species of Cordyceps are normally partial saprophytes, since they attain their full development after the death of the host; but whether wholly parasites or saprophytes, or parasites and saprophytes combined, their peculiarity in growing naturally only upon insects or insect remains con- stitutes them entomogenous, in the sense in which I use the term, to the exclusion of © such forms as Penicillium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium and the like; which, although they may at times not only grow on insects, but become temporarily truly parasitic upon them, are yet found in nature on a great variety of other substances. - With this brief reference to entomogenous plants in general we may now turn to the consideration in detail of the group which forms the subject of the present paper. ENTOMOPHTHOREAE. General characters—This family at present comprises several genera, the members of which are not all entomogenous, though closely related structurally. They are dis- _ tinguished by the production of numerous hyphae of large diameter and fatty contents, which, in the insect forms, ultimately emerge from the host in white masses of charac- teristic appearance and produce at their extremities large conidial spores which are yio- lently discharged into the air and propagate the disease. The common house-fly fungus is perhaps the most familiar example of the kind, and no one can have failed to notice — the affected flies in autumn or late summer adhering to looking-glasses or window-panes surrounded by a smoky halo of discharged conidia. In addition to these conidia the ‘propagation of the fungus, after long periods of rest, may be provided for by the forma- _ s ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 137 . tion of thick-walled resting spores adapted to withstand successfully the most unfavorable conditions. These resting spores, which may be either sexual (zygospores), or asexual (azygospores), finally germinate and produce conidia that are discharged in the usual fashion and serve to infect fresh hosts. Such in brief is the general mode of develop- ment in Hntomophthoreae; yet it is subject to so many variations and modifications in the different genera and species that a detailed comparison of them is instructive as well as necessary for a sufficient understanding of the family. I shall therefore consider each stage among the /mpusae in some detail, having first briefly mentioned the more impor- tant points of structure in the remaining genera. These genera are four in number: Oompletoria, Conidiobolus, Basidiobolus and Massospora, the members of which, as al- ready mentioned, are not all entomogenous. The genus Completoria, which, as has been pointed out by Nowakowski and others, should be placed among the Entomophthoreae, was discovered by Lohde (/. c.) in the pro- thalli of ferns and has been subsequently more thoroughly investigated by Leitgeb (J. ¢.). Its presence is indicated by brown spots upon the prothallus within the cells of which it exists in the form of short thick hyphae, which spread from cell to cell by means of slen- der projections. The latter penetrate the cell wall, which becomes modified around them into a sheath-like structure, and having thus gained access to an adjoining cell con- tinue their development at its expense. The two usual forms of reproduction, by means of conidia and resting spores, are found in the genus and are of a very simple type. When about to produce conidia the short thick hyphae or hyphal bodies, as they may be termed for convenience, germinate sending up asexually fructifying hyphae or conidio- phores which, after penctrating to the surface of the prothallus, become swollen at their extremities and produce ovoid conidia which are discharged into the air. After their discharge the conidia become pear-shaped, and the basal papilla of attachment to the basidium, or swollen extremity of the conidiophore, is protruded as a hyaline append- age (Nabel). ‘The conidia germinate and spread the disease by entering other pro- thalli with which they may come in contact. The resting spores are formed within the cells of the prothallus, and result from the mere contraction of the contents of the hy- phal bodies, which become surrounded by a thick wall. According to Leitgeb, this formation shows no indications whatever of a sexual origin, although his figures do not seem to preclude such a possibility in view of what is at present known of sexual proc- esses in the group. The germination and further development of these resting spores have not as yet been observed. The genus is at present represented by a single species, Completoria complens Lohde, and has been found and cultivated by Leitgeb upon pro- thalli of numerous genera and species. It is at present unknown in this country. From this comparatively simple form we may now pass to the consideration of one somewhat more complicated, which is also parasitic upon another plant, in this instance a thallo- phyte. The genus Conidiobolus was accidentally discovered by Brefeld in connection with his researches upon the Tremellini on which it is parasitic; and its discoverer, having obtained spores from cultures in which it had appeared, was enabled by cultivating them in nutritive solutions, to trace its development with the greatest completeness. The co- nidia grow readily in a decoction of horse dung, forming a mass of branched and rarely septate hyphae; which, having nearly exhausted the nutritive solution, become 138 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE broken up, through the formation of partition walls, into numerous irregularly lobulated fragments which correspond to hyphal bodies, as I use the term. These lobules appear early in the development of the hyphae, in the form of irregularly swollen projections from them; and mark the points of origin, even at an early stage, whence the conidio- phores are subsequently to arise. Shortly after this general disintegration of the hy- phae, single, simple conidiophores arise from each fragment, in number corresponding to the swellings above described, and produce large, ovoid conidia which are discharged in the usual way. The chief interest of the genus lies, however, in the formation of its rest- ing spores, which seem to be of sexual origin. This formation of zygospores appears as that of the conidia begins to disappear, so that both forms are at first developed side by side, while eventually the conidial formation ceases entirely,— a circumstance which seems to verify this author’s previously expressed opinion that an alternation of some regularity exists between the appearance of the two types of reproduction. In the for- mation of these zygospores, hyphae arise from swollen projections, similar to those already described as being the origin of the conidiophores, which, after a variable devel- ment, conjugate through the apposition of their swollen extremities, the contents of one extremity uniting with that of its fellow through the absorption of the intervening walls, and producing in one of them a thick-walled zygospore. Owing to a difference in size of these conjugating extremities, Brefeld was inclined to place the family among the Oomycetes; but the previous observations of Nowakowski' in Hmpusa, together with more recent studies of the family, render this improbable. In from ten days to five weeks after their formation, the resting spores were made to germinate; and sending out one or more hyphae produced usually a single conidium resembling those characteristic of the species. Of these, two are described: Conidiobolus utriculosus and C. minor, neither of which has been observed in the United States. The genus Basidiobolus, discovered by Hidam, is perhaps the most interesting of the Entomophthoreae from the unusual differentiations which accompany its asexual as well as sexual reproduction. Unlike other members of the group the species are wholly sa- prophytic, occurring naturally upon the dung of frogs and lizards after evacuation; while they may be readily cultivated in nutrient solutions similar to those employed by Brefeld in his study of Conidiobolus. According to Hidam, the fungus is present in the digest- ive tract, only in the form of spores or hyphal bodies which are dormant until they are evacuated with the faeces upon which they subsequently develop, forming large color- less hyphae with numerous cross partitions. These hyphae do not become broken up into hyphal bodies before reproduction commences, except in so far as this condition may be approached in cases similar to that figured by Hidam? where, in a concentrated nutrient solution, the segments of the hyphae become rounded; but do not, however, break apart as in Conidiobolus. In reproduction the hyphal segments may produce slender single conidiophores which, rising vertically, become greatly swollen at their ex- tremities. From the apex of this conidiophore the large conidium buds and, during its formation, the swollen extremity which bears it becomes modified by the contraction and thickening of its walls into a peculiar piece or basidiwm, which is discharged, together with the conidium, by the explosion of the slender conidiophore. DE Cows 211; 6s, Plex tian: ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 139 The formation of zygospores is also quite peculiar, and always results from the conju- gation of two adjacent cells in the same hypha, except in some instances where two co- nidia may conjugate directly. In either case conjugation is preceded by the formation of finger-like processes from either of the conjugating cells, which, arising opposite each other, are usually closely applied. Conjugation, however, does not take place by means of these processes which, at first sight, would suggest a Rhynchonema-like type; but by the absorption of the partition wall between the conjugating cells and the direct passage of the contents of one into the other. In this instance, as well as in Conidiobolus, the cell in which the zygospore is to be formed is recognizable before conjugation by its larger size. The function of the finger-like processes above mentioned seems wholly connected with the division of the nuclei which pass into them and become divided in two parts; the upper portion disappearing without becoming a new nucleus while the lower passes as a nucleus into the zygospore. ‘lhe zygospores are of two varieties: one, larger than the more common form, is very thick walled and covered by a peculiar brown incrustation which renders it opaque; the smaller and more usual variety was made to germinate in nutrient solutions and produced hyphae which developed the characteristic conidia of the species. Two genera remain to be mentioned: Tarichium of Cohn and Massospora Peck. The former, as has been several times pointed out by writers on Entomophthoreae, is, with- out doubt, merely the resting stage of some Hmpusa, the conidia of which are as yet unknown. In Massospora, however, which has not, I believe, been previously referred to the present family, we have a form quite peculiar, the near affinities of which cannot be determined by reason of the absence of any knowledge concerning the formation of its resting spores, or the germination of the multitudinous internal spores which char- acterize the genus. With this brief mention of the remaining genera we may now pass to a consideration of the genus Hmpusa, which, with its subdivisions, includes only entomogenous forms. I have preferred to consider these subdivisions as a whole under “mpusa as a matter of convenience, as well as from the fact that [am not at present inclined to believe that they have more than a subgeneric value; but my reasons for this course, as well as for my use of the name Hmpusa in preference to Hntomophthora, may be better given here- after when the principal morphological differences in the species have been touched upon. Tue Genus Empusa. Infection and production of hyphal bodies —As has already been mentioned, infection among entomogenous Entomophthoreae results from contact with a conidial spore which, adhering to the insect host, enters its body by means of a hypha of germination. The exact method of this entrance is hardly a subject for actual observation unless, perhaps, in insects which, like many aphides, are semitransparent, and, owing to their soft integu- ment, afford an easy entrance to the hypha at almost any portion of the body. In other insects, more especially beetles, grasshoppers, ichneumons and the like, the horny integ- ument must diminish considerably the chances of infection; and in such cases the stig- mata or the thin membrane connecting the body segments and leg joints must be the 140 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE principal points of entrance. Infection, resulting from the ingestion of spores with the food, does not, I think, occur as is indicated by experiments with wood crickets which will be mentioned under #. Grylli; and, as a rule, the digestive tract during life does not seem to be penetrated by the fungus. After the hypha of germination has entered the body of the host, it develops with some rapidity at the expense of the softer tissues. This growth usually differs from that de- seribed in Conidiobolus from the fact that, instead of producing a branched mycelium, the hyphae multiply, not by branching and continuous growth, but by the formation of what I have previously called hyphal bodies, which consist of short, thick fragments, of very varied size and shape, that are continually reproduced by budding or division until the insect is more or less completely filled with them. In some instances these hyphal bodies have been observed as naked masses of protoplasm with an amoeboid movement, as is stated to be the case in /. colorata; but in most instances a cell wall may be dem- onstrated. In H. Grylli,at an early stage, the hyphal bodies may be seen loosely adher- ing in clusters as aresult of continued budding; but more often in this and other species they occur singly or in pairs. It is probable, however, that this mode of development is subject to considerable variation and that in some instances a mycelium may be produced directly, after the entrance of the germinating hypha. I have been unsuccessful in en- deavoring to cultivate conidia in sterilized solutions; although, by employing a drop of water in which numerous aphides had been crushed, I was enabled to obtain a fairly vigorous growth from the conidia of /. aphidis. In this case the germinating hypha branched in all directions, forming a considerable mycelium with numerous septa; but, owing to the lack of nutriment as well as to the presence of bacteria, the hyphae soon became much attenuated and finally died. DeBary’ states that this production of a mycelium as a first result of infection occurs in EH. ovispora, H. curvispora and H. sphaerosperma (radicans) ; but, according to Nowakowski, in his summary of the Em- pusae; the first two are not thus characterized, while my own observations of 1. sphae-_ rosperma do not bear out his statement that the “fungus growth” within the host is filamentous in all cases. It seems not improbable that both forms of development may occur under different conditions; but, however this may be, the termination of the first or merely vegetative condition of the fungus consists in the production of a mass of hyphal bodies which fill the host more or less completely; and in no instance, I believe, is this stage or its equivalent omitted by the direct growth of the original hyphae into conidiophores. On this assumption, in cases where a direct mycelial growth follows the entrance of the hypha of germination, if indeed such instances occur, this myce- lium must fall to pieces into hyphal bodies, before the commencement of growth the direct object of which is reproduction, in a fashion resembling that above described at a similar stage in Conzdiobolus. The hyphal bodies, the production of which usually marks the end of any appropria- tion of nourishment from the host and generally occurs at about the time when the host has ceased to live, are in many cases somewhat different from those which have previ- ously characterized the fungus and often possess great regularity, both in size and shape, closely resembling spores. In /. Fresenii, for example, the original hyphal bodies 1Vergl. Morphol. d. Pilze, ete. TG. 45, panne ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 141 are such as are represented in figs. 106-108, while fig. 127 shows examples of those which precede the spore formation and are derived from them. In other cases, the ulti- mate hyphal bodies may be very irregular in size and shape. In all instances, they contain a highly concentrated fatty protoplasm and are capable of subsequent and often very extended development. Having reached this condition by the production of a mass of hyphal bodies, the fun- gus, under favorable conditions of temperature and moisture, may proceed at once to the completion of its development; but if these conditions are absent, a resting or chlamydosporic condition supervenes, in which the contents of each hyphal body be- come surrounded by a single wall of variable thickness according to the duration of this enforced resting stage. In this manner, the fungus may remain dormant for a considerable period until the presentation of proper conditions for further growth. How long the chlamydospores may live, I am unable to say; but I have observed their germi- nation after several weeks, and they probably retain their vitality for a much longer period, and may perhaps hibernate under certain circumstances. They form a very con- venient means for the cultivation of Empusae in water, in which they proceed at once to the formation of conidia or of resting spores. The period from first infection to the formation of chlamydospores or hyphal bodies, prior to the commencement of the repro- ductive growth, varies according to the host. In very minute and ephemeral insects, such as many gnats that are commonly attacked, the period must necessarily be short, not exceeding two or three days; but in cases where I have been enabled to observe this period, which has been unfortunately only in connection with the larger hosts, such as flies and caterpillars, it varies from six to twelve days. Germination of the hyphal bodies and chlamydospores.—HUaving appropriated the whole or the greater portion of the nourishment afforded by the host, the fungus is now ready to expend it in the second or reproductive stage of its growth. Under the influ- ence of a moist atmosphere and a sufficiently high temperature, the hyphal bodies “oerminate” with great rapidity. The amount of moisture needed to produce this ger- mination is variable in different forms. In the common house-fly fungus (7. muscae), for instance, a slight change in the amount of atmospheric moisture is sufficient to pro- duce conidial formation and discharge. This is very noticeable on the seashore, where slight changes of the wind on or off the water produce a very rapid and noticeable ef- fect upon flies thus parasitized when observed in the ordinary atmosphere of the house. In other instances, more especially in those species which, unlike the house-fly fungus, are characterized in their conidial reproduction by a considerable external growth of hyphae, amuch greater degree of moisture is a necessity. Hxtreme cases of this kind are found in species such as #7. conica or H. sepulchralis which occur only in very moist situa- tions. In germinating, each hyphal body or chlamydospore sends out one or more hyphae which grow with great rapidity; but the manner of this germination, together with the subse- quent development of the resulting hyphae, varies considerably in different species and under different condition. In the simplest case a single hypha thus produced may grow directly to the outer air and then produce a single conidium or set of conidia, according to the type peculiar to its conidiophores. In other cases, a single primary hypha may MEMOIRS BOSTON SOC. NAT. HIST., VOL IV. 21 * x Zz a he s =. a 2 * 142 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE branch indefinitely, each ultimate branch becoming a conidiophore similar to those of the more simple case just mentioned. This usually occurs where the conditions of growth have been very favorable and may be found side by side with the more simple form. Although the number of germinating hyphae developed from a single hyphal body is usually small, not as a rule exceeding one or two, certain instances occur in which the number is considerable. In #. conglomerata, for example, as described by Sorokin, long hyphal bodies are found which germinate in all directions and are not unlike, in this re-_ spect, the hyphal bodies previously mentioned in Conidiobolus. These hyphae subse- quently branch and anastomose, forming a coherent mass which Sorokin has termed a stroma, and on which he has based a classification of H’mpusae into “Stromaticae” and “ Astromaticae.” It is probable, however, that this condition is interchangeable with the more ordinary form, since in some specimens for instance of #. apiculatus, I have found well marked stromata, while in others the direct development of the conidiophores from hyphal bodies has been distinctly traceable. The most singular modification of this kind, however, occurs in . aphidis and virescens which are the only species thus far in which it has come under my observation. Here we have a body which appears to be of the same nature as the hyphal bodies in other species, of regular spherical form and with a highly refractive fatty contents, from which, soon after the death of the host, hyphae begin to germinate in all directions and in in- credible numbers, in a fashion that reminds one of a head of Aspergillus (figs. 239 and 261). The hyphae thus produced then branch and divide, becoming separated into a mass of irregular, short, contorted hyphae which fill the host and distend its body. This breaking to pieces of hyphae produced from hyphal bodies also is found in species where the usual type of germination occurs: as in #. muscae, in which, just before the emer- gence of the conidiophores, the body cavity contains a mass of irregular short hyphae together with germinating hyphal bodies. Formation of conidiophores.—The germination of the hyphal bodies results either in the production of sexual or asexual resting spores (zygo- or azygospores); or of coni- diophores bearing conidia. In the latter instance hyphae, arising directly or indirectly from the hyphal bodies, grow rapidly outwards, burst through the less resistent por- tions of the host’s integument in spongy masses, in most instances of a livid white color. These masses sometimes vary to pale or bright green or dull olive, even in forms where their normal color is white; and there is considerable variation in their general appear- ance according to the species or to the conditions of their development. In some cases, they barely project beyond the body of the host and are confined to the points of emer- gence which are generally afforded by the thin intersegmental membranes through which they project in cushion-like rings as in #. muscae. In other eases, the external growth may be more extended and the masses may coalesce so as to cover the whole body with a continuous layer of conidiophores which may form a mass several times as large as the insect from which it springs. In the first and more simple case, where there is little external fungus growth, the cushion-like masses are usually formed by simple conidiophores (fig. 1) which, although each may be derived in common with many others from the same hyphal body, are yet ultimately simple, producing few or no branches outside the host’s body and giving rise —_——- 6s ine rr en ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 143 to a single conidium. In the second instance, where the external growth is greater, a different type usually occurs in the conidiophores. Not only is the external branching very considerable, but the ultimate divisions of each conidiophore are arranged in a co- rymbose or digitate fashion, as in figs. 202 and 220. ‘This occurrence of simple and compound conidiophores in different species has led to the generic separation of the two groups; yet the distinction is by no means absolute, and intermediate forms occur, as in EH. culicis, LH. apiculatus and a few additional species. The converse is also true, and simple conidiophores are very commonly found in species where the type is usually com- pound. As has been already remarked, the growth of conidiophores is very rapid under favorable conditions; and an insect containing hyphal bodies, if placed in a damp, warm atmosphere, may give rise to the characteristic white masses in a few hours. Soon after the appearance of these masses the production of conidia commences, and this brings us to the next step in the conidial development. Formation and discharge of the conidia—The terminal portion of the conidiophore, whether this be simple or one of several digitations, is termed the basidium and is usu- ally swollen to a greater or less extent. From the apex of this basidium, which is ho- mologous with similar structures occurring among the Mucorini, the conidium, or more properly the mother cell of the conidium, is formed by budding. This bud increases at the expense of a portion of the contents of the basidium, until it has attained very nearly the normal shape and dimensions of the conidium; when it becomes separated from the basidium by a cross partition, which forms at first a horizontal plane of separa- tion between the two and is homologous with the columella of the Mucors. Within the mother cell thus formed is developed a single conidial spore, the walls of which are nor- mally in close apposition to those of its containing cell, which must thus be considered asporangium reduced to its simplest terms and modified to combine economy of material with a judicious dissemination. The resemblance to a one-spored sporangium is clearly seen in cases where, through the absorption of water by osmosis, the wall of the mother cell becomes separated from that of the conidium; a phenomenon which is very com- monly seen after, or even before, the discharge of the conidium, and is sometimes carried to such an extent that the conidium may be seen floating free in a large spherical mother cell (fig. 321). When the conidium is fully developed, and even previous to this, the contents of the spore, as well as of the basidium, begin to expand through the absorption of water. At first, as a rule, the contents of the basidium exert the greater of the two forces thus produced; perhaps owing to the fact that a more rapid absorption of water is possible through its single wall than through the double wall of the conidium. For this reason, the columella is at first forced outwards into the conidium'towards which its convexity is thus turned. In some instances, especially in cases where the basidia are large and strong, this condition of things may continue until the discharge of the conidium. Such is apparently the explanation of the appearance figured by Nowakowski' which is referred to by Hidam’ as a mechanism for discharge, very different from that usually found in Empusae. I think, however, that this will prove to be only an extreme case of the nature just described. In my own experience I have observed this appearance only ']..c. B, Pl. xt, fig. 82, etc. ate Cr De 1S. 144 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE infrequently in the species referred to, #. Grylli, and in allied forms (fig. 83). — It should be noted that contraction of the spore contents from any cause might also produce the same condition. In by far the majority of cases, the contents of the conidium, be- ing more dense than that of the basidium, finally exert a greater pressure and forces the columella back into the basidium, thus reversing its former position. The sum of these opposing forces is very considerable, and as a natural result of their action a rupture of the wall ensues at the point where they are opposed, that is, in a circle round the base of the mother cell. This circle of rupture is usually very evident in discharged conidia, being indicated by a slightly ragged projection which forms a ring at the base of the papilla (fig. 85). As a result of this rupture, the conidium is discharged violently into the air, often to a considerable distance. The columella commonly remains un- broken by this discharge, although it is often greatly stretched and hangs from the ba- sidium as a tongue-like projection. In other instances it may be accidentally broken or this rupture may be normally connected with the discharge. In the latter case, a por- tion of the protoplasm from the basidium is discharged with the spore and serves to fix it to any object with which it may come in contact. The presence or absence of a columella in different species has been made a point of structural difference to which more weight has, I think, been given than is justified by the facts. The assumption that a columella exists and is wholly or partially destroyed by the discharge of protoplasm above alluded to, in cases like #. muscae for example, seems to me at least as warrantable as the apparently needless assumption of the absence of so characteristic a structure. Moreover, the presence of a ruptured. columella is often indicated even in #. muscae by the numerous shreds that may be seen adhering to the basidium after discharge (fig. 2). The conidia and their germination.—The conidia in their normal condition are of yvari- ous size and form, often varying considerably in the same species. The extremes of shape are well represented by the nearly spherical spores of 1. muscae and the slender tapering form of #. gracilis. In size they vary from about 10# in length to 75+ or over. They are usually hyaline, rarely slightly colored, with a fine granular contents; or, more com- monly, contain coarsely granular protoplasm with large fat globules. In many instances, these fatty bodies are so regular in size and shape that the conidia resemble asci filled with spores; a fact which probably accounts for the statement “Flocci fertiles intus sporidiis elobosis referti” in a description of what seems undoubtedly an Hmpusa, by Fries.1 The common occurrence, also, of very large single oil globules seems to have caused a similar error. The walls of the conidium are, so far as known, always smooth, without spines or similar modifications, and possess an adhesive quality which serves to attach them readily to any object, even when their discharge is unaccompanied by the mass of pro- toplasm above described. The basal portion of the spore is always more or less papil- late, the papilla being in reality that portion of the spore proper which projects from within the mother cell, from which it is distinguished by the ring of dehiscence. The conidium when discharged, if by chance it has come in contact with a suitable host, adheres to it, and sends out a hypha of germination which enters its body as pre- viously described. When placed in water the conidia give rise to one or more hyphae LRGs ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 145 which branch and elongate, growing constantly more attenuated, their protoplasmic con- tents becoming separated by successive cross partitions from the empty hyphae left behind (fig. 240). It may here be mentioned that this separation by cross partitions is common in the general growth of the fungus. The hyphae produced thus from conidia have the usual characteristics: a granular protoplasmic contents which often shows a very notice- able streaming motion, and contains large oil globules and a hyaline wall. The power of germination lasts, according to Brefeld, at most only a week, or slightly more in #. radicans (£2. sphaerosperma) ; but in my own experience I have found the period usually much shorter than this. he period is in all probability very variable; spores that have been formed under unfavorable conditions being better able to withstand simi- lar conditions: the endurance of the spores, moreover, varies with different species. As a rule, germination takes place very soon after discharge, and if the conidium has neither fallen upon a proper host nor upon a wet surface it proceeds to form Secondary conidia.—The secondary conidium is a provision for further dissemination in case the primary spore has fallen on a substance unsuited to its proper development. The most common method of formation consists in the production of a hypha of vari- able length, which, growing vertically upwards, becomes swollen at its extremity into a basidium, and produces a conidium similar to that whence it is derived. This is dis- charged in the usual fashion, and may in turn produce tertiary, etc., conidia, in a similar yay, until its vitality is exhausted or it has found a suitable lodgment. The conidio- phore formed in this process is usually simple, even if the type from which it was de- rived is digitate; yet I have seen, in a case where numerous spores had been discharged upon wet moss, that the hyphae arising from them united to form a mass of conidio- phores of the digitate type peculiar to the species. Although the form of secondary conidium just described is most commonly found, and is apparently the normal type in all species under favorable conditions, it is subject to several interesting variations that are dependent, for the most part, upon an insufficient supply of moisture. The first of these consists in the production of a secondary conid- ium quite different from the primary, either by direct budding from it (fig. 9), or borne upon a short hypha of germination (fig. 362). These conidia are also discharged; but are apparently better suited to resist unfavorable conditions than the ordinary ones, and. probably retain their power of germination much longer. ‘The most singular modifica- tion, however, is presented by a few species allied to HZ. sphaerosperma and H. Presenii. Tn these forms and their allies, when the conditions of moisture are unfavorable for the ordinary process, a long, slender, capillary conidiophore is produced, on the end of which is borne a peculiar secondary conidium differing still more widely from the parent spore than in the case just mentioned. These secondary conidia (figs. 157, 191, ete.) are, with one exception, nearly almond- shaped, with noticeably thick walls, and are not discharged. Whether they ever produce tertiary spores similar to the primary ones, I have been unable to determine; but the for- mation from them of tertiary conidia similar to themselves is not uncommon. They may often be seen germinating by means of an irregular hypha which, beginning as a drop- like protuberance from the apex of the spore (fig. 119), may grow to a considerable length (fig. 122). Hidam, in his paper on Basidiobolus (Pl. 9, fig. 16), figures a mode 146 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE of germination in this genus of a related type; but as the author describes the swollen extremity of the conidiophore as a basidium, the similarity is not so striking as a com- parison of this with fig. 119, for example, in the present paper, would lead one to infer. Cystidia and rhizoids—Before leaving the conidia and conidiophores, two additional structures must be mentioned, which are of some importance morphologically. These are the so-called cystidia, or paraphyses as they have been called; and a modification of cer- tain hyphae, known as rhizoids, which serve to attach the host to the substratum on which it rests. The cystidia are usually simple hyphae, exceeding the conidiophores in size, and projecting beyond them, often to a considerable distance. In some instances they are very large (fig. 306), and readily seen with the naked eye; while in others they do not differ from the conidiophores. They are not, I think, homologues of paraphyses in other fungi, and their office is unknown; unless, perhaps, they may be considered as rhi- zoids which are functionless from their position; an explanation which seems to me very probable. A modification of the paraphyses should be mentioned which occurs in Z. echinospora, a species in which, contrary to the usual type, the zygospores are very com- monly produced externally. In this case, when the sporophores have emerged from the host, certain of their number may be seen projecting beyond the rest (fig. 297). While the process of spore formation is going on, these hyphae grow rapidly, forming ultimately a delicate network about the mass of mature zygospores. The hyphae of attachment, or rhizoids as they may be conveniently termed, consist of hyphae which, growing from the lower and outer portions of the fungus mass, attach themselves to the substratum upon which the host rests and serve to hold it firmly in position. The rhizoids may be simple or variously branched, and their termination may be variously modified into an expanded “sucker” (fig. 249). They do not, I think, enter into soft substances, and their adhesion is apparently due to the presence of a viscous secretion. They are produced with great rapidity, appearing even before the host is dead, and increasing in number with the appearance of the conidiophores. Rhizoids are con- fined to certain species, and generally accompany the digitate type of conidiophores; their presence should not, however, in my opinion, be considered of any importance as a generic distinction. It is now necessary to return once more to the condition in which we find the host filled with chlamydospores, or hyphal bodies, in order to examine the phenomena con- nected with the Formation of zygospores and azygospores——As has been previously remarked, the germination of the hyphal bodies or chlamydospores may result in the production of conidia above described; or may lead to the formation of spores called resting spores, of a very different nature, and adapted to withstand successfully conditions that would prove fatal to the conidia in a short time. The passage to this resting condition may be accom- plished by a wholly non-sexual process, in which case the resulting spore has been termed an azygospore, or by sexual union of a type similar to that found in the Mucorini. The spores thus formed are usually of large size, spherical with one exception; with ahighly refractive fatty contents; surrounded by triple walls, the outer thin and representing the wall of the mother cell, the second much thicker, and the inmost usually as thick as or thicker than the other two combined. hae «Ge ; - a - > - ia ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 147 The simplest process by which azygospores are formed is presented by the case in which the contents of a hyphal body become directly converted into a resting spore, usually contracting somewhat and surrounding itself with two walls, the normal third wall being represented by that of the hyphal body, within which the spore may be en- tirely free, or to which it may be closely applied. A modification of this process occurs sometimes in the case of chlamydospores, which may be transformed directly into azyg- ospores by the deposition of a third inner wall. Azygospores may also be formed in a variety of ways from hyphae of germination aris- ing from chlamydospores or hyphal bodies, or not uncommonly by direct lateral budding from them. In the first case the azygospore may be terminal (fig. 40), at the apex of a hypha of greater or less length, or may bud laterally. This process, which may be read- ily seen by cultivating chlamydospores in water, resembles at first the analogous forma- tion of conidia; the end of the hypha, however, does not produce a bud, but becomes swollen into a mother cell, which is not separated from the hypha by a cross partition, and within which the double-walled spore is formed. Still another method consists in the production of azygospores interstitially (fig. 81), which is common in certain species and leads to the occurrence of spores having very irregular shapes. These in general are the more common types of azygosporic formation, of which there are numerous slight modifications. Where true zygospores are formed, a considerable amount of variation is exhibited in the process as it occurs in different species; and al- though the sexual nature of the spore is beyond question in some instances, it is not so well marked in others, and may, as Nowakowski has suggested, represent a transitional form from the truly sexual to the wholly asexual processes. Such instances are found in H. sphaerosperma, a species in which, according to Brefeld, the production of resting spores follows the septation and anastomosis of a mass of hyphae filling the host, the spores being produced laterally from these hyphae without regard to the points of an- astomosis. In my own experience I have observed something of this sort in the legs of insects attacked by H. sphaerosperma and its near ally EL. occidentalis; but in the bodies of the hosts examined, which, it should be remarked, were of a very different na- ture from those (Pieris larvae) studied by Brefeld, I found only short, contorted hyphae producing spores apparently in a wholly asexual manner (fig. 217), but associated with them, numerous instances where the budding spore was directly associated with a cross- putition or a slight lip-like fold indicating the previous existence of such a partition (figs. 214-216). Whether spores thus formed should be called zygospores seems at least doubtful, and the partitions described may indicate merely the ordinary division of the hyphae. Ina very few cases, however, I have, in these two species, seen a process as well marked as that represented in fig. 197, occurring in the legs of certain hosts where, as a rule, the hyphae attain a considerable length. This certainly looks like true conjuga- tion, and may lead us to cases where the presence of a sexual union is hardly to be ques- tioned. The first instance of the latter class discovered among the Entomophthoreae is that described by Nowakowski' in his three new species, /’. conica, EL’. ovispora and Ei. curvispora. In this type we have hyphae, within or without the body of the host, producing lateral outgrowths at opposite points of two different hyphae, which meet ls C2, As 148 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE midway between the two conjugating cells in a fashion analogous to the similar process in Spirogyra. The intervening walls between these two gametes, or conjugating out- growths, are then absorbed and a mingling of their contents ensues. A bud then appears (fig. 322) on one or both the gametes, which increases rapidly, as a rule appropriating the entire contents of each conjugating cell to form the zygospore. A septation of the hyphae above and below the point of conjugation is often seen, but is not invariable, resembling in this respect the similar process in Conidiobolus previously described. It may be mentioned, in passing, that the chief distinction between the two rests on the fact that here we have a zygospore formed by budding, while in Conidiobolus the spore is produced directly within one of the conjugating cells. In this, as in other cases, the empty hyphae disappear rapidly after the zygospores have been formed; a circumstance which, together with the rapidity of the process as a whole, accounts for the infrequency with which conjugation in Hmpusae can be observed. In one case, however (Z. rhizo- spora), the hyphae after conjugation become brown and horny, holding the spores firmly in a spongy mass (fig. 374); but even here the process of conjugation can only be seen during a short period, while the spore is developing, owing to the subsequent contraction and distortion of the hyphae. In #. echinospora, in which the zygospores are often external, a modification of this Spirogyra-like process is found, which deserves to be mentioned. Here (figs. 298-302), we have a conjugation taking place between two filaments in a manner similar to that described above; but, instead of arising by budding from one of the gametes or in their immediate vicinity, the spore commonly develops as a terminal swelling from the end of one of the conjugating hyphae. Tn addition to these types of conjugation, a singular form, not, I believe, noticed hith- erto in Entomophthoreae, occurs in H. Hreseni. It is,as far as I have observed, invari- able in this species and is never associated, as is usually the case, with the production of azygospores. The hyphal bodies, as they occur in the host just prior to the production of conidia or zygospores, are almost perfectly spherical and very uniform; and are de- rived from large, shapeless bodies which have the appearance of naked protoplasm. The spherical hyphal bodies lying side by side within the host proceed to conjugate in a man- ner indicated in the succession of figures 127 to 135. A slight projection first appears from the upper inner end of either hyphal body (fig. 128). These projections soon meet midway between the hyphal bodies (fig. 129), after which a bud begins to rise di- rectly above their point of union (fig. 130). The contents of both bodies pass into this bud, forming the mother cell of an elliptical zygospore which, I believe, affords the only known exception to the usual spherical shape. After the spore is mature, the two hyphal bodies usually persist for some time as bladder-like appendages (figs. 135-136), which slowly disappear (figs. 187-140). This is certainly a very simple process, yet it demonstrates I think, more clearly than has yet been possible among Entomophthoreae the existence of an undoubtedly sexual process of a distinctly zygosporic type. In Conidiobolus, Basidiobolus, and even in the examples from Hmpusa previously given, there is usually a more or less marked differ-— ence in the size of the gametes, which, in the first-named genus, led Brefeld to consider the family as belonging to the Oosporeae; but, in the present instance, we have the ga- eae y oe ae ’ ty ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 149 metes exactly alike, and in addition to this a process of development in the zygospore similar to that occurring among the Mucorini in Pptocephalis. The regularity of this process, and of the resulting zygospores, is worthy of mention; and although the hyphal bodies are collected in an indiscriminate mass, the details of the process never show the slightest variation from that described above. Before leaving the subject of conjugation in Empusae, a singular method, by which the resting spores of #. Grylli are often formed, must be described. This species is re- markable for the great variety it exhibits in the details of the formation of its azygo- spores; but in certain cases it seems not impossible that even in this species we may have true conjugation of a type quite different from those previously described. The suc- cessive figures, 31 to 35, indicate the nature of this process. In the first place we have, before reproduction of either type, a condition characterized by the presence of irregu- lar, rounded hyphal bodies of various size and shape (fig. 31). Instead of producing an azygospore by any of the methods above described, one of these bodies may become septate by the formation of a median cross partition (fig. 32). An elevation of the cell wall presently appears around the hyphal body, between the cells thus formed, which develops into a two-lipped fold (figs. 33 and 34). The partition between these two cells is then apparently absorbed, for the contents of one gradually pass into the other to form a “zygospore” (fig. 35). A variation of this process is found in the similar division of the swollen extremity of a hypha (figs. 38-39) the lip-like folds in each being quite peculiar. In many cases the formation of a resting spore is not accomplished by a sin- gle division and subsequent union; but only results after a succession of oblique divis- ions always accompanied by the lip-like folds, as in figs. 36 and 37. Spores of this kind are usually characterized by their flattened bases, and in some instances two such spores may be formed, one in either cell of the divided hyphal body, as often occurs in other conjugating cells. Whether this is in reality a form of conjugation, I do not feel pre- pared to say; and careful observations, by means of cultivations of the hyphal bodies, are much to be desired. This process may in a measure explain the appearance previ- ously alluded to (p. 147) and represented in figs. 214-216. Here there is no production of a lip-like fold, yet it seems not impossible that in such cases a short hypha may have divided and conjugated with itself, so to speak; the zygospore arising as a lateral bud instead of developing directly within one of the divisions. Such an explanation may seem somewhat far-fetched, yet the division of a hypha and subsequent conjugation with _ itself are practically what occurs even in Basidiobolus. The mature azygospores as well as the zygospores in all known species are, with the exception of H. Hresenii, spherical in shape; and in the majority of cases are indistin- guishable in the different species, except by slight variations of size. There are, how- ever, three notable exceptions to this rule. ‘The spores of TVarichiwm megaspermum Cohn? are characterized by a deep brown outer wall, or epispore, which is marked by sinuous reticulations. In Z. echinospora (figs. 8303-305), the epispore develops numerous sharp spines which separate it from all other known species; while in /. r/:zospora the brownish spore is held by numerous rhizoid-like outgrowths from its base (figs. 374— 375). A dark brown epispore seems also characteristic of H. calliphorae Giard (2. muscivora Schroeter). lees a. MEMOIRS BOSTON SOC. NAT. HIST., VOL. IV. 22 150 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE In my own experience, I have never observed the germination of resting spores in any instance, although I have continued cultivations of them in water for upwards of three months. I have not, however, had an opportunity of adopting the plan suggested by Eidam of cultivating them in nutritive solutions, and a trial of this method might lead to more satisfactory results. A germination of the resting spores of certain species is reported by Nowakowski, Sorokin and Krasilstchik; and the first-named author states that such spores placed in water in the autumn germinate during the following spring. I have, however, seen no account of successful cultures of this nature unless it exists in the text of Nowakowski. The description given by Krasilstchik of a species (. uvella), in which he obtained a germination in four days, seems hardly reconcilable with the facts as known in other genera. From analogy with Basidiobolus and Conidiobolus, it is not to be questioned that the resting spores germinate, as in these cases, producing the usual conidia; but whether this has been determined by actual experiment, I am un- able to say. The period of rest before germination is probably very variable, and its primary object is, of course, to afford a means of hibernation, or of withstanding simi- lar protracted conditions unfavorable to development, and of long duration. Although a single season is probably the normal period of this resting state, it has been suggested by Brefeld that it may be extended over more than one season, thus allowing the insect host to recover from the effects of Hmpusa epidemics. The causes which induce the formation of resting spores can be explained with as little satisfaction among Empusae as in other similar cases. The observations of Brefeld in his experiments with 7. sphaerosperma Fres. (2. radicans Bref.), which indicated that their production takes place towards the end of the season, gradually supplanting the conidial form, are not corroborated by my own experience. ‘This, at least, does not seem to be the course followed in the natural development of the fungus out-of-doors; since the examination of some thousand or more of specimens shows that as a rule the. relative number of individuals of a given species, which contain resting spores, remains about the same from the middle of June to the middle of October. Whether the pro-. duction of resting spores bears any relation to the number of previous generations of conidia is a matter to be determined only by careful and repeated cultures in different. cases. None of the remaining causes usually assigned as inducing zygosporic forma- tion have any apparent influence in the present instance. But here also repeated experi- ments in different cases, under known and variable conditions of moisture, temperature and nutrition, are necessary to determine whether variation in these respects seems to have any definite connection with the kind of spores produced. The hosts of Empusae include representatives from all the hexapod orders; but among them the Diptera are the greatest sufferers, at least in so far as the number of Empu- sae which prey upon them is concerned. The Hemiptera come next, followed by the Lepidoptera and Coleoptera; while the Neuroptera, [tymenoptera and Orthoptera are about equally affected, and are attacked by two or three species, only, in each instance. The liability to infection is shared by both larvae and pupae as well as_by imagines, although the latter are most commonly affected. In insects where the larvae and pupae differ but slightly from the imago, both these stages are equally susceptible to the dis- ease. Mr. L. O. Howard has also shown me specimens of H#. Grylli that had devel- ne ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF TITE UNITED STATES. 15] oped upon the common web worm (//yphantria textor) after pupation; but this oceur- rence is certainly unusual. Among Lepidoptera, I have been surprised to find the imagines attacked in numerous instances, a fact, I believe, not hitherto observed; and one species (2. geometralis) seems peculiar to them. Geometridae, Noctuidae and Ti- neidae may be affected, and I have even found the common sulphur butterfly (Colias philodice) thus attacked. The species or family of the host has hitherto been generally considered a means of determining the species of Hmpusa, in most cases, with some accuracy; yet my observations have shown that this is by no means the case and _ that specific distinctions, based largely upon the character of the host, are of little value. The variety of hosts attacked by a single species is sometimes very great, perhaps in no instance more so than in LZ. sphaerosperma. Lhave specimens of this form upon the larva of Pieris, on the imago of Colias philodice, Diptera of several families and genera, Phytonomus larvae (Coleoptera), the common rose-leaf hopper ( Typhlocyba) and Aphis (Ilemiptera), on ichneumons of several genera and a small bee (Hymenoptera), and on a species of Thrips (Thripidae), while in Europe it is also recorded on Limnophilus (Neuroptera). With such a diversity possible in the hosts, it is obviously unsafe to de- scribe, as new species, forms without peculiar characters of their own, merely because they occur in a new host, or to give any considerable specific weight to the character of the host in support of slight variations in the shape of the conidia or the size of the resting spores. In certain instances, where several Empusae were found together, I have noticed two species developed upon a single host; for example, 2. Aphidis and HL. Fresenii, as well as HL. conica and H. papillata; H. gracilis and LE. variabilis; FH. lageniformis and LH. occidentalis. It is, therefore, not always safe, where such proximity exists, to refer the resting spores that may occur in connection with conidia to the same species of H’m- pusa. The habitat of Empusae is various, one of the most productive localities being the margins of brooks in shady woods. Certain species are found only in such situations, ad- hering to wet substances, such as moss, logs, stones, ete., in the water or along its mar- gin; a constant supply of moisture being apparently necessary for their development. In other cases dryer situations are preferred, and the fungus readily withstands the al- ternate dryness and moisture consequent upon the variations of weather, producing its conidia repeatedly, whenever the atmosphere is sufficiently moist, until the conidiophores are exhausted. Many hosts, before death, seek conspicuous positions by crawling up- wards on grass, or other substances, whence the conidia are discharged over a consider- able area. Perhaps the favorite pusition assumed by hosts before death is upon the under side of leaves in shady situations in woods or about houses, where a careful search during wet weather seldom fails to disclose numerous specimens. I have noticed only one species which occurs on flowers attractive to insects, namely H. Muscae; which, al- though common in all parts of houses, I have only seen in nature on the flowers of Sol- idago and eextet-certain Umbelliferae. Miscellaneous notes—In collecting Empusae I have found that, as a rule, fogg weather is the most favorable for the purpose, since they are more conspicuous when distended by moisture. A shallow tin box, partly filled with moist Sphagnum, is a con- 152 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE venient receptacle for specimens; and the latter should be kept separate. In the labora- tory each specimen should be inverted over a slide or cover in a moist chamber, until a sufficient number of conidia have been discharged, when it may be dried for the herba- rium. Conidia, obtained in this way, may usually be kept for reference for an indefinite period; and, since they allow the comparison of very large numbers of spores side by side, are most convenient for study. The artificial propagation of Empusae, by the infection of fresh hosts, I have found a much more difficult matter than one would suppose, even when the host infected was of the same species as that from which the spores were obtained for this purpose. Infec- tion between dissimilar hosts I have found still more difficult; although, in two instances, I have been successful in infecting caterpillars with H. Grylli developed on grass- hoppers, as well as in transferring . sphaerosperma from leaf hoppers (Lyphlocyba) to a Pieris larva. The method which I[ have adopted for infection consists in the use of a tightly-covered jelly tumbler in which the upper portion is separated from the lower by a round piece of wire netting. By placing the hosts to be infected in the lower of the two chambers thus formed and fastening a specimen of H’mpusa in the upper one, the living hosts below can hardly escape the spores discharged through the netting. The period which ensues after the infection of a host until its death varies to some ex- tent. In the larger hosts, such as flies or caterpillars, death may not take place for twelve days; although the usual period is from five to eight days. In minute hosts this period must be considerably shortened, owing to the ephemeral character of many forms known to be subject to the attack of Empusae. The first visible symptom of the disease is a general restlessness of the host. In caterpillars, for instance, the insect leaves its food plant and wanders restlessly about; usually endeavoring to climb upwards before death, which is apparently quite sudden and unaccompanied by contortions of the body. The host insect thus remains clinging to the object on which it rests or is fastened to it by rhizoids. Certain insects are fixed by the insertion of their probosces into the substratum on which they rest, as is the case with aphides. The house-fly is, I believe, always fas- tened by its proboscis which adheres firmly to the substratum. Where rhizoids are de- veloped, they often appear before the death of the host, and I have seen a geometrid moth, which was thus firmly attached to a pine needle, fluttering violently in its at- tempts to escape. In the account of the separate species of Empusae which follows I have used this generic name for all the forms, employing the names Hntomophthora and Triplosporium in brackets as groups of subgeneric value. In Hmpusa proper I have included forms in which the branching of the conidiophores is of the simple type, and the formation of resting spores presumably asexual, taking 7. Muscae as the type. Under Triplosporium, J have included the two forms #. Fresenii and H#. lageniformis, the ‘position of which in Empusa is only provisional. The group is characterized by the production of conidia having a smoky tint, thick-walled, with evenly granular contents and producing peculiar almond-shaped secondary conidia on capillary conidiophores; while its zygospores are elliptical, each originating as a bud which rises upward from the point of conjugation of gametes arising from two hyphal bodies. Further study of #. lageniformis may ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 153 show that these characters, as regards the formation of resting spores, are not suffi- ciently distinctive. Yet I doubt if this proves to be the case; and, should it prove otherwise, I believe that the subgenus should be separated as a genus from other Hm- pusae. Under Lntomophthora, which I have used in brackets as a subgenus, I have included all forms characterized by the production of typically digitate conidiophores; differing from recent German writers in not considering this character of generic value, as well as in omitting even as a subgenus the name Lamia given by Nowakowski to a single form (2. Culicis). In his extended paper on Entomophthoreae,! Nowakowski summarizes the generic distinctions of Hmpusa, Hntomophthora and of his genus Lamia, as follows: 1. Eyromopuraora including ovispora, curvispora, conica, and Aphidis. Fungus growth, one-celled or with filamentous branches. Paraphyses, rhizoids and columella, present. Conidiophores, branched. Resting spores, zygospores (three species), azygospores (two species). 2. Lamia including the single form Culicis. Fungus growth, filamentous. Paraphyses, present. Rhizoids and columella, absent (nie ma). Conidiophores, unbranched. Resting spores, azygospores (borne terminally). 3. Empusa including Grylli, Fresenii and Muscae. Fungus growth, filamentous. Paraphyses and rhizoids, absent. Columella, present or absent. - Conidiophores, simple. Resting spores, azy gospores. Whether Nowakowski in his text gives more satisfactory characters for the genus Lamia than are shown in the above table I am unable to say; but, from the data here given, the presence of paraphyses (which I have apparently overlooked in examining the species) is the single point which separates it from Hmpusa as defined below it. The opinion of Brefeld that the form should be separated as a connecting link between Hm- pusa and Hntomophthora, based upon a tendency to a digitate type observable in the co- __ nidiophores and upon the presence of rhizoids is more readily understood, yet singularly 4 | ; ' i enough, and erroneously I think, Nowakowski affirms the absence of both these points of structure. In my own opinion, #7. Culicis cannot be separated from 2. Muscae by other than specific distinctions; the points of similarity of the two being decidedly greater than their points of difference. The same may be said of the two species subsequently described as #. papillata and H. apiculata which bear somewhat the same relation to HB. Grylli that 2. Culicis does to LH. Muscae; each having rhizoids and showing a slight tendency, in the case of #. apiculata at least, to a digitate type of conidiophores. Taking the genus Hntomophthora, as defined by Nowakowski in the same table, the digitation of the conidiophores is apparently the only exclusive difference of importance which separates it from Hmpusa. Even here . Culicis and E. apiculata tend to break Tien neds. De 176. 154 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE down the distinction, as already mentioned. No definite line can be drawn, also, as con- cerns the production of resting spores; since in species of the sphaerosperma type, which must be placed in Hntomophthora, we have exactly the same type of formation with that oceurring in H. apiculata, which it is equally necessary to place in Hmpusa. It is true that conjugation is not known in Hmpusa unless it is represented in the very question- able type deseribed under #. Grylli; yet it is unsafe to assume that it does not exist, or that its absence is of generic value. The only consistent way out of the dilemma con- sists either in considering all the forms under the tolerably coherent genus Hmpusa, or in resorting to further splitting to express transitional forms. The sphaerosperma section of Hntomophthora, for example, shows decided differences from the rest of the group in the character of its branching, in its conidia and secondary conidia as well as in its formation of resting spores, and may, perhaps, with fuller knowledge of the species already known or subsequently to be discovered, prove separable from the remaining forms. Our knowledge of Empusae is at present in its infancy, and conclusions in respect to subdivisions must be largely based on doubts; a foundation much more likely to pro- duce confusion than a clear understanding of the group. The use of the name Hmpusa in preference to “’ntomophthora needs a word of expla- nation, since the two have, until comparatively recent years, been used in the same sense to designate entomogenous Entomophthoreae generally. Although an Hmpusa had been previously described by Fries under an erroneous generic name (Sporendonema), the paper of Cohn! upon the “house-fly fungus” is the first in which the group was recog- nized by a generic title, Hmpusa. This publication appeared in 1855, and in the follow- ing year Fresenius, in an article’ preliminary to his more extended paper on the subject,” pointed out that Hmpusa, having been preoccupied for a genus of orchids, should be dropped, proposing Lntomophthora in its place. A few months later Lebert,’ taking the same ground, proposed the name Myiophyton, over which the name of Fresenius of course has priority. The two names have subsequently been used indiscriminately until separated as two distinct genera by Brefeld and Nowakowski, who thus tacitly recog- nized the validity of Hmpusa as a name; a validity also admitted by Cohn, Hidam, Schroeter and DeBary who employ it without question. If therefore a single name is to be used, Hmpusa certainly has priority and sufficient weight of authority to make its use good. As a matter of fact the orchidaceous genus Hmpusa is placed as a synonym in Bentham and Hooker’s Genera Plantarum, and seems unlikely to produce confusion in any Case. The position of the Entomophthoreae among the Zygomycetes is placed beyond a doubt by the formation of the resting spores above described, yet it is interesting to note that, until the publications of Nowakowski, and even subsequently, there has been much difference of opinion concerning their true position; the weight of opinion assigning them a place among the Oosporeae. The theory that the members of the group were merely stages in the life-history of Saprolegniae, which has been maintained on a basis of actual experiments as well as their supposed connection with the yeasts (Saccharomyces), is manifestly incorrect and a matter of historical interest only. In the latter case it is of interest to note that species of Saccharomyces very frequently occur in connection with ‘Lc. A. *l.c. B. PUT. ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 155 Empusae in aphides and flies, the one class of hosts usually having a sweet secretion and the other preferring sweet substances as food, thus supplying a nutritive medium for the growth of yeasts in connection with the Hmpusa. It has occurred to me that the frequent presence of yeasts in this connection might indicate a swectish secretion from the Hmpusa itself in order to attract hosts for infection; but I have seen no indications that this is the fact. A natural arrangement of the species of Hmpusa is a matter of great difficulty, since their characters do not, I think, indicate a single line of development. In the sue- ceeding enumeration, for example, the two forms included under Triplosporium can hardly be properly placed either at the beginning or at the end of the remaining series, and their position between Hmpusa proper and Hntomophthora is equally unsatisfactory. The near relations of the forms described as #. Caroliniana and EL. Lampyridarum is also a matter of doubt which may perhaps be removed by further study. A list of the remaining species found in Kurope and not yet distinguished in this country, with brief characters and references, is appended for the convenience of students and includes, I be- lieve, all published names not previously referred to. References given as J. c., 1. c. A, etc., refer, as in the previous pages, to the appended list of papers consulted where full titles and references are given. EMpPusa Cohn, 1855. Empusa Muscae Colin. Pl. 14, figs. 1-9. Empusa Muscae, Cohn l.c. A. Brefeld 1. c. A; l. c. B, p. 28; J.c.¢. Schroeter 7. ¢., p- 221. Nowakowski /. c. B, p. 176. Entomophthora Muscae, Fresenius 1. ¢. A, p. 883; 1. c. B, p. 202, figs. 1-23. Giard Ll. ¢., p- 358. Sorokin J. c. C, p. 195, figs. 877, 582-585. Winter J. ¢. Myiophyton Cohnii, Lebert 1. c. ?Sporendonema Muscae, Fries 1. c. Conidia bell-shaped or nearly spherical, with a broad subtruncate base and sharply pointed apex; 18 Xx 20,,—25 x 30,; containing usually a single large oil globule, and surrounded after discharge by a mass of protoplasm. Conidiophores simple, broad and stout, tapering gradually to a narrow base; emerging in white rings between the segments of the host, without coalescing over its body. Secondary conidia like the primary, or more commonly suboyoid, small, rounded at the apex and formed by direct budding from the primary form. esting spores, azygospores, produced laterally or ter- minally from hyphae within the host; spherical, colorless, 30-50, in diameter (Winter). Host attached to substratum by proboscis. Hosts. Diptera: Musca domestica, Lucilia Caesar, Calliphora vomitoria and other large flies; also Syrphidae of several genera. ' Habitat. United States, Europe, South America. This familiar Hmpusa is as common as it is widely distributed, and is at present the _ only species known south of the equator. It is probable that it is as universal as its more 156 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE usual host (Musca domestica) ; since, if not indigenous in remote localities, its transpor- tation by sea would be almost inevitable. As a rule, the species is found about houses, usually within them, occurring in great abundance from the latter part of June until late in the autumn; yet its occurrence out-of-doors is an exceptional phenomenon and has been noticed in only a few cases. This is the more singular, since hosts that are liable to infection are very common in the open air, and a transmission to them of the dis- ease from the house-fly would seem a very easy matter. Isolated examples of #. Muscae are, however, almost never found in situations frequented, for instance, by Syrphus flies, although Cornu! records an extensive epidemic in which the hosts attacked belonged to this genus. In my own experience I know of only two instances of the isolated oc- currence of this species out-of-doors. The first was observed early in July on Mt. Washington where two small specimens of Syrphus were found on bushes in the alpine region, both of which were infested by “. Muscae; and in the second instance a speci- men of a small, yellow-bodied Syrphus was found at Albany in August on the flowers of Solidago by Mr. A. F. Chatfield, and forwarded to me, the host in this case being at- tacked by the same Hmpusa. Mr. Chatfield informs me that it was the only specimen observed, and although I have searched with great care for similar specimens, I have never seen a second instance of the kind. An epidemic in the open air, caused by #. Muscae, I have, however, observed in one locality where a hairy black fly (Anthomyia sp.) about as large as M. domestica, was found killed by this fungus. This locality was the region in the immediate vicinity of the snow arch at the head of Tuckerman’s rayine, on Mt. Washington, where the affected flies occurred sticking in large numbers to the flowers of Solidago and Heracleum. These flowers were also visited by an abundance of other flies, among them many examples of the same species of Syrphus previously mentioned from Mt. Washington and Albany; but in no instance did I find one of these or of the numerous other Syrphidae and Muscidae visiting the flowers, that showed any signs of infection from the black flies with which they could hardly have failed to come in contact. This failure of certain species to contract the disease, although known to be subject to it, is interesting as indicating that even a slight change of hosts among Empusae is often difficult, until the fungus has become established to some extent in its new conditions, and may go far to explain the difficulty experienced in cross infection subsequently mentioned under #. Grylli and H. sphaerosperma. The species is readily distinguished by its pointed, bell-shaped spores which, although entirely similar to those of #7. Culicis, are much larger. The probable rupture of the col- umella has been previously alluded to (p. 144) and the surrounding pellicle of proto- plasm gives a characteristic appearance to spores which, for example, have been discharged upon a glass slide (figs. 5-6). One of the chief points of interest about the species is the uncertainty that exists concerning its resting spores, which, although the form is so universal have as yet been observed in only one instance. Winter? states that he discoy- ered specimens of MM. domestica in-doors which contained resting spores, and also pro- duced conidia which he identified as belonging to #. Muscae. It seems quite impossible that Winter should have mistaken the conidia of any other species for those of #. Mus- cae; yet this observation, although referred to, is not credited by Brefeld,who concludes llc. B. 21. ¢. ——— ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 157 that the species never produces resting spores and is continued over winter in warmer regions, whence it migrates northward with the flies on the return of summer. This theory, however, does not coincide with my own experience of /’. Muscae in this coun- try; since the first specimen which I observed at Cullowhee, where .M. domestica liter- ally swarmed, was observed at about the same date at which it usually appears in the north, namely July first. For three weeks previous to this date I saw no specimens at Cullowhee; and although I have found not the smallest trace of resting spores in a sin- gle instance, it seems improbable that the migration theory can apply to this country at least. Giard' also states that he found resting spores, which were produced externally, oc- curring on specimens found in cool situations; but it is difficult to determine from his description whether the bodies described are true resting spores, and the observation needs confirmation. On plate 1, fig. 7 and plate tr, fig. 12, of Lebert’s paper,! this author has also figured bodies that seem to be resting spores at an early stage of their formation. The literature concerning H. Muscae is very voluminous; the first description of the form having been given by DeGeer in 1782, according to Brefeld; and for further ref- erences to this literature the elaborate papers of Cohn, Lebert and Brefeld above cited should be consulted. Whether the first supposed description accompanied by a dis- tinctive name, that of Fries,' really applies to the present species is, I think, extremely doubtful; for the oil globules in #. Muscae could hardly have given rise to the expres- sion “flocci fertiles erecti,.... intus sporidiis globosis referti,” whereas in species of the ovispora type, this error of observation might readily have occurred. Empusa Culicis A. Braun. Pl. 14, figs. 10-16. Empusa Culicis, A. Braun 1. c., p. 105. Entomophthora Culicis, Fresenius J. ¢. B, figs. 44-45. Lamia Culicis, Nowakowski l. c. B, p. 173, figs. 99-114. Entomophthora rimosa, Sorokin (J. c. A, p. 146; 7. c. B, p. 393, Taf. xm, figs. 12-19 (with cut); J. ¢. C, p. 231, figs. 595-596, 575, 576, 603; 7. c. D, p. 58, plate 1, figs. 1-13. Nec H. rimosa, Schroeter U. ¢., p. 222. _ ?Saprolegiha minor, Kitzing 1. c., p. 157. Conidia bell-shaped or nearly spherical with a broad subtruncate base and sharply pointed apex; 8 X 10,—15 X 16,, average 11.5 X 12,,; usually containing a single large oil globule, and surrounded after discharge by a mass of protoplasm. Conidiophores simple or with a tendency to become compound; broad at the apex and gradually taper- ing to a narrow base; producing white or greenish masses which may or may not coa- lesce over the body of the host. Cystidia present (Nowakowski). Secondary conidia like the primary, or ovoid with rounded apex and formed by direct budding from the primary spore. esting spores, azygospores, produced laterally or terminally from hy- phae, spherical, colorless, 25, (? in diameter). Host attached by rhizoids. ey ee MEMOIRS BOSTON SOC. NAT. HIST., VOL TV. 23 158 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE Hosts. Diptera: imagines of Culex and numerous genera of minute flies or gnats. Habitat. Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Europe. This is apparently the smallest of all the Empusae and is reported to be common in various parts of Hurope. Although not previously accredited to this country, I have found it repeatedly in the localities above mentioned. At Kittery, Maine, it occurred early in July on very minute Diptera, adhering to the under side of the leaves of hop, hollyhock and other plants growing about houses; and isolated specimens were found in. similar positions in the neighboring woods, or marshy places. Although mosquitoes (Culex) abounded in these localities, the only specimen of this insect that I haye seen infested with #. Culicis was found on the edge of a small brook in the alpine region of Mt. Washington. In this same locality, at the head of Tuckerman’s ravine, I have found an insect also attacked by H. Culicis, whose reputation is perhaps worse even than that of the mosquito, namely the “black fly” (Simulium molestum). ‘These specimens were also found upon the under side of leaves, as in the case of the examples from Kit- tery; although in Europe the more usual habitat seems to be such moist situations as are afforded by the margins of brooks or the borders of tanks, in which, also, infected spec- imens may often be found floating. The form described by Sorokin as 1. rimosa seems certainly to belong to this species, as has been pointed out by Nowakowski, although Sorokin, in his later publications, still adheres to the opinion that his species is distinct. In describing #. rimosa,' Sorokin states that the host is attached by rhizoids, and that the conidiophores appear on the thorax, seldom on the abdomen of the hosts, producing bell-shaped conidia of which, so far as I have seen, he gives no measurements in any of his publications. The resting spores he describes as of irregular outline, produced laterally on internal hyphae, which ~ subsequently thicken, contract and, bursting the body of the insect, assume a vertical position on the outside. He also remarks that, from the brief description of A. Braun, it is difficult to say how far the two species (7. rimosa and EH. Culicis) are distinguished. The figures of Fresenius from material received from Braun are, however, good, and correspond to those of Sorokin in Cohn’s Beitrage.? As regards the “stroma,” which Sorokin describes in this species, I have been unable to satisfy myself; but where the fungus has developed with tolerable Juxuriance I have found a condition very like that which he describes; namely, a mass of septate, anas- tomosing, empty hyphae filling the body of the insect. In other cases, however, I have observed the presence of spherical hyphal bodies or of chlamydospores (fig. 15), which ger- minated and, after more or less branching, produced conidiophores in the usual way. The resting spores are unknown to me, although I have frequently found small flies contain- ing resting spores in company with the conidial form. In these cases the constant as- sociation with specimens of /. sphaerosperma on similar hosts has made it impossible to determine to which species the resting form belonged. According to the description of Sorokin above quoted the resting spores would seem to be quite peculiar; yet Nowakow- ski figures spores of the usual type borne terminally on long hyphae. Were. C; ip. 231. 21. ¢c. B, Taf. xin, figs. 16-18. eT ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 159 Empusa Grylli (Fresenius). Pl. 14, figs. 17-48. Entomophthora Grylli, Fresenius 1. c. A; 1. c. B, p. 203, figs. 24-43. Sorokin 7. ¢. ¢, p. 211, fig. 653. Farlow, Ellis Exsiccati N. A. Fungi, No. 1401. Empusa Grylli, Nowakowski J. c. B, p. 168, figs. 72-98. Schroeter J. ¢., p. 222. Entomophthora aulicae, Reichhardt in lit. (see Bail Z. c.). Cohn J. ¢. B, p. 77. Sorokin l.¢. C, p. 212. Schroeter 0. c., p. 221. Entomophthora Calopteni, Bessey l. c.; Ellis Exsiccati, No. 1f01. oe - Conidia ovoid to pear-shaped, with a broad papillate base and evenly rounded apex; 30-40), X 25-36, ; hyaline and containing one or more large fat globules. Conidiophores simple, coalescing externally when growing luxuriantly, and arising directly from round- ed irregular hyphal bodies, with or without subsequent branching. Cystidia wanting. Secondary conidia of one kind, like the primary. esting spores spherical, colorless; 30-45, in diameter; produced terminally or laterally from hyphae, directly within or by budding from hyphal bodies; or by a pseudo-conjugation between two divisions of a single hyphal body. Host attached to substratum by the contraction of its legs. Hosts. Lepidoptera: larvae of many genera of Arctians and of Orgyia nova. Orthop- tera: larvae, pupae and imagines of many genera of Acridians. Imago of Ceuthophilus. ? Diptera: larvae and imagos of Tipulidae, ete. (see H. conglomerata). Habitat. Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New York, Washington, D. C., North Carolina, Ohio, Iowa, Newfoundland, Europe. As will be observed, by the synonymy given above, I have included under this species the two forms described as H#. aulicae and H. Caloptent. The description of the first- mentioned species by Cohn! is, I believe, the first mention of this name that is ac- companied by any note which would render a determination possible. There can be no doubt, I think, that the form common in this country on hairy caterpillars is the same species described from Europe on similar hosts, since the American form agrees with the European in all respects as far as can be ascertained from published data. Assuming this identity, a comparison of the form on caterpillars and the still more common form on grasshoppers, can hardly fail to afford convincing proof that the two represent a sin- gle species, their general structure, development and appearance being the same, or varying within similar limits. I have observed numerous epidemics of the grasshopper form at Kittery in Maine, near Boston and in North Carolina; and the caterpillar form seems also very common, assuming, Mr. Howard informs me, an epidemic character among the Hyphantria larvae which have recently done considerable damage to the shade trees in Washington. In the summer of 1886, I found an epidemic early in September among grasshoppers that were destroying the second crop in a field at Kittery,and also noticed a number of Arctian larvae similarly affected in an adjacent garden. Being struck with the similar- ity between the two, I endeavored to transfer the disease from the grasshoppers to cat- erpillars, and for this purpose placed a larva of Spilosoma virginica and several of Bl Cs5\ DP: 1Gs 160 “ROLAND THAXTER ON THE Hyphantria teator in a jelly tumbler, and fastened above them a grasshopper from which the spores were being rapidly discharged. ‘These larvae were then fed for eight days in a closed jelly tumbler, at the end of which time the Spilosoma had died, and, soon after being placed in a moist chamber, produced a luxuriant growth of conidiophores. In the meantime all of the Hyphantria larvae had died from insect parasites, with the excep- tion of two which spun cocoons after a few days. I was entirely unable to transfer the disease from caterpillars to grasshoppers; but I was quite as unsuccessful in infecting grasshoppers from grasshoppers. The reinfection of caterpillars I found more easy, although about two-thirds of the -aterpillars used for this purpose showed no signs of the disease and pupated as usual. I was unable to repeat the experiment of cross infec- tion with any satisfactory result, owing to the fact that it was impossible to obtain cat- erpillars in any number, or good material of /7. Grylli with which to infect them: I was obliged therefore, in a second experiment, to use larvae of Pyrrharctia isabella which were in the hibernating condition. Of five larvae used, one died in eight days and con- tained resting spores; while the rest were not affected after several weeks. I do not consider these experiments as in the smallest degree conclusive in themselves; but a comparison of other species shows that the hosts of Empusae may be widely-different in the same species, and therefore a specific distinction, which, as in the present instance, would rest entirely on the character of the host, should not be considered of any value, even if my experiments did not show that the hosts may be, to a certain extent, inter- changeable. I have been much surprised at the difficulty encountered in communicating the disease among similar hosts, although in the case of grasshoppers this may be perhaps accounted for from the fact that I used only imagines, which may afford a less ready entrance to the germinating spores than younger stages of these insects. In the case of the hairy caterpillars, however, I see no reason why infection should not have been successful in every case. A specimen of Ceuthophilus, found at Kittery, which was discharging spores in great quantities, was also used im an attempt to infect three individuals of the same spe- cies which were confined with it in a small tin box. The living crickets were put into the box late in the afternoon when the spore discharge was at its height, so that several hundred spores at least must have come in contact with each specimen. On the follow- ing morning the living crickets were not only well powdered with spores, but had eaten about half of the infected specimen. Nevertheless, after having been kept for more than two weeks, they showed no signs of the disease. In view of these facts, it is not surprising that my success in cross infection should have been so incomplete, and it may reasonably be assumed that so radical a change of hosts is probably a somewhat gradual process even in nature, the fungus, as has been already noted, requiring one or more generations to become firmly established under its new conditions of nutrition. Since the species is so widely distributed and generally abundant, there seems to me no good reason for believing that the resting spores described as 2. Calopteni and found in Caloptenus at Ames, Iowa, belong to a different species; and I have therefore placed this as asynonym. ‘Through the kindness of Professor Farlow, I have been ena- bled to examine authentic specimens of 1. Calopteni collected by Professor Bessey which differ in no respect from the usual resting spores of 1. Grylli. Professor Farlow has also ; » ie ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 161 allowed me to examine material of 1. Girylli received from Professor DeBary, and there can be no question concerning the identity of the American and European forms. The occurrence of the species in Newfoundland, where I found it on the larva of Orgyia nova on the Salmonier river, should also be noted; since this is, I think, the most northern lo- eality in America from which Empusae have been recorded. Morphologically, the species is chiefly of interest from the pseudo-conjugation already described on p. 149. I have not had an opportunity of studying the process by cultiva- tions of hyphal bodies; and the figures which represent it (figs. 31-39) are drawn from specimens which occurred simultaneously in a single grasshopper. ‘The process is not uncommon, occurring chiefly in the femora; but in all cases the usual azygospores are by far the most abundant form of resting spores. ‘The production of a double spore by the incomplete union of the two halves of a hyphal body is not infrequent, resulting in forms similar to that represented by fig. 47, in which the union was nearly complete. It sometimes occurs also that there is no union between the two halves, and an azygospore is formed on either side of the median partition. The most common mode by which azygospores are formed is that represented in fig. 43, where the spore is the result of direct budding from the usually irregular hyphal bodies. Ihave never seen in the caterpillar or in the grass- hopper form a process of this kind which is wholly comparable with that figured under H. conglomerata (figs. 60-61), for in this case the hyphal bodies are very regular, nearly round, and bear the spores on a short neck. This process is, moreover, inyaria- able in the Z%pula form as far as I have seen and shows none of the variations which oceur in Girylli. The same process is figured by Nowakowski,' but it is not stated in the explanation of the plates whether these figures are drawn from material on grass- hoppers or gnats. The budding, from an arachnoid hyphal body, of spores, which in the explanation of his plates’ Nowakowski calls “zygospores,” I have observed in only two cases; but as there seems no indication in this of a sexual process, and Nowakowski in his synoptical table of the species® places #. Grylli under “Azygospora,” I infer that the use of “zygospory” in this connection is a printer’s error. A very common form, which I have seen frequently in cultivations of hyphal bodies in water, is that repre- sented in fig. 40, where the spore results from a terminal enlargement of the hypha of germination. A formation from septate hyphae, as in fig. 45, I have seen only once or twice; but the septation as well as the anastomosis and short projections associated with it has, I think, no significance. The occurrence of resting spores is about equally com- mon in caterpillars and in grasshoppers, and the association with them of conidia devel- oped from the same specimen, frequently occurs. ‘The conidia as a rule show little important variation in size or shape, the caterpillar form showing sometimes a tendency to taper more gradually to a slightly broader base than in the grasshopper form; but, on the other hand, I have never seen this tendency so marked in caterpillars as I found it in the spores obtained from the Ceuthophilus above mentioned (figs. 25-26). The earliest occurrence of this species that I have noticed was at Cullowhee, N.C., where I found a single specimen early in July. On the grassy summits of Roan Mt., N. C., it was epidemic in August and also in mowing fields at Cranberry, N.C. An epidemic observed in September at Kittery has already been mentioned; and the latest rie. B, fig. 94, 7 G2; p. 182: 6. B, polite 162 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE occurrence that I have noticed was among caterpillars in Cambridge late in October. The tendency of the affected hosts to crawl upwards before death, instead of concealing themselves, as one would naturally expect, is noticeable in this, as in other Empusae, and results ina far more effective dissemination of the spores. The Ceuthophilus above mentioned, which usually lives under logs and in similar situations, had crawled up a bush about six feet high and hung suspended from the topmost twigs; grasshoppers also almost invariably crawl nearly to the top of the culms of grass before death, and are thus very conspicuous and easily collected. Mr. Miyabe informs me that he has seen grasshoppers in this position in Japan; but whether the Hmpusa by which they were attacked is H. Grylli or not, I am unable to say. For some mention of European epidemics caused by “Z. aulicae” which have been no- ticed as far back as 1835, reference should be made to the papers of Cohn and Bail al- ready cited. Empusa Tenthredinis (Fresenius). Pl. 15, figs. 49-55. Entomophthora Tenthredinis, Fresenius 1. c. B, p. 205, figs.51-58. Sorokin J.¢. €, p. 212, fig. 652. Conidia broadly ovoid, tapering slightly towards the apex and with a prominent, rather narrow papillate base; 25 X 35,—35 X 55,4 (62.5, = maximum length, sec. Fresenius). Conidiophores simple, coalescing over host. Secondary conidia like the primary. eest- ing spores unknown. Host attached to substratum by its legs. Rhizoids not observed. Hosts. Hymenoptera: larvae of Tenthredinidae. Habitat. Kittery, Maine; Europe. T have referred to this species a form found early in September upon a small Tenthredo larva feeding upon Scutellaria in a swampy situation among woods. The larva when found was hanging flaccid by its prolegs, and the conidiophores were just beginning to emerge in small tufts over its body. The spores are somewhat smaller than those de- scribed by Fresenius, nor is their difference from H. G‘rylli as decided as represented in Fresenius’ plate. A slight tendency to taper more equally from the middle of the spore towards the base and apex, as well as its usnally more delicate papilla, may separate it from Grylli to which it is closely allied. It is apparentlyrarely met with even in Europe, the only mention that I have seen beyond that of Fresenius being a reference by Cornu? toan Hmpusa on Tenthredo larvae. The reference and figure in Sorokin’ are taken from Fresenius. Empusa conglomerata (Sorokin) ?. Pl. 15, figs. 56-62. Entomophthora conglomerata, Sorokin l. ¢c. A; l. c. B, p. 388, Taf. xm, figs. 1-11; JU. ¢. C, p. 228, figs. 574, 594, 592. ? Hmpusa Grylli, Nowakowski (in part) J. c. B, p. 168. Aide (C2 Aspe So. Tce > ee et ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 163 Oonidia broadly ovoid, usually with a single large oil globule; 22 x 25,—25 x 40,; average 23 X 32,. Conidiophores, simple. Secondary conidia, like the primary. testing spores, azygospores, produced from spherical hyphal bodies and borne on a neck-like process of variable length. ost floating on water, or among moss in water. Hosts. Diptera: larvae and imagines of 'Tipulae. Habitat. Mt. Washington, N. H.; Cullowhee, N. C.; Europe (on Culex). It is with great hesitation that I have referred to this species a form found in the small brooks which arise in the locality known as the Alpine Garden on Mt. Washington and also very rarely at Cullowhee. In the former locality, the Zipula larvae were very fre- quently met with among moss over which water was running. These larvae were dead having a milky color, and after being placed upon slightly damp moss which absorbed the excess of moisture from them, produced conidia with great rapidity; but in not very considerable quantities. On examination, the body was found in every case to be filled with resting spores in various stages of development, and the conidiophores were present in such small numbers that a “stroma,” such as is described by Sorokin in this species, would not have been apparent. The conidia closely resemble those of #. Grylli, and usually contain a single large oil globule in the centre. The difference in habitat be- tween #. Grylli and the present form is certainly very great, and it is doubtful if Z. Grylli would survive soaking in running water for a week or more as is necessarily the case with the 7%pula larvae above mentioned. The regular production of resting spores from nearly spherical hyphal bodies is not such as is found in #. Grylli and this is the only morphological difference that I have been able to find between the two. Whether material in good condition and free from resting spores would show the “ stroma” of So- rokin, remains to be determined; but judging from the spores figured by this.author,! as well as by the host and habitat, the present form at least approaches very nearly to Z#. conglomerata. Sorokin gives no measurements of the conidia that I have been able to find, but shonld the measurements correspond, the conidia of the two forms would be in- distinguishable. Sorokin states that the conidium is discharged together with a body of protoplasm from the basidium, a circumstance which, in the examination of dried material, I have not been able to verify in the present instance. In the plates of Nowakowski' certain of the figures of #. Grylli are drawn from ma- terial on Culex, and this author is inclined to think that Z. Grylli and 2. conglomerata are the same. The figures referred to do not wholly corroborate this view and it may be mentioned that one among them’ exhibits the same regular formation of resting spores from spherical hyphal bodies that I have represented in figs. 60 and 61. Empusa apiculata, nov. sp. Pl. 15, figs. 63-70, 74-75. Conidia nearly spherical, with a prominent papillate base, terminating in a short, sharp and abrupt point; 28-30, X 30-37, average 30 X 35,. Conidiophores simple, some- times with a tendency to become digitate, originating directly or indirectly from nearly Pirie. 1. 21. c. B, Plate xr, fig. 94. 164 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE spherical hyphal bodies. Secondary conidia like the primary. esting spores, azygo- spores or zygospores(?), formed laterally or terminally from hyphae, spherical; hyaline, 30-45,. Host attached to substratum by long and conspicuous rhizoids, few in number and terminating in an irregular, disc-like expansion. Hosts. Lepidoptera: larva of Hyphantria textor, imagines of Tortrix sp., Deltoid sp., Petrophora sp. (geometrid). Diptera: numerous genera of small flies or gnats. He- miptera: imago of a species of leaf hopper (Z'yphlocyba). Habitat. Maine and North Carolina. Var. major. Pl. 15, figs. 71-73. Conidia more nearly spherical; 38 X 45,,—55 X 60,; basal papilla smaller in propor- tion to the body of the conidium than in the typical form. Host, Coleoptera: imago of Péilodactyla serricollis ( fide Henshaw). Habitat. Cullowhee, North Carolina. It is with some reluctance that I have given a new name to this form, although by the presence of strong rhizoids and by its apiculate papilla it seems a well-marked species. The existence of three allied species, #. Jassi, H. Planchoniana and LE. conglomerata, concerning neither of which is any information procurable beyond the insufficient data already published, makes the description of a related form necessarily dangerous, so that the present name is in a measure provisional until more complete descriptions or figures of the three forms mentioned are published. The case is rendered still more confusing by the occurrence on aphides of the species described below and placed provisionally un- der #. Planchoniana. 'This may prove to be the same with the form under consideration, and both may be identical with #7. Planchoniana; yet, what the latter species is, it is wholly impossible to determine from published data. In the present species we have the first recorded instance of an Hmpusa growing up- on a lepidopterous imago as its host, although, as will be subsequently seen, this is not an unique case. ‘The geometrid moth, above mentioned as one of its hosts, was taken on the wing, flying slowly with an unnatural fluttering motion and being placed in a col- lecting box it was soon fastened to a leaf by five or six long and powerful rhizoids. These on examination were found to be made up of several hyphae each ending in an irregular expansion (fig. 75) around which a hyaline substance seemed to have been se- creted, converting it into a disc-like sucker. Where several of these terminations had touched the leaf at adjacent points the several expansions usually coalesced to form one large “sucker,” with a continuous even outline formed by the secretion just mentioned. This moth contained both conidia and resting spores, the latter forming in a manner ex- actly resembling that subsequently mentioned under H. sphaerosperma. The appear- ance of a resting spore haying its origin in connection with a cross partition, as in fig. 74, occurred occasionally and seemed wholly analogous to the similar appearance in Z. sphaerosperma (figs. 214-216). The conidiophores, in many instances, arise directly from nearly spherical or elliptical hyphal bodies (fig. 64); but in some cases I have observed a condition where the body 7 i ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 165 has been filled with a coherent mass of empty, interlacing hyphae resembling the “stroma” described by Sorokin and previously referred to. The conidiophores, which are clear white, coalesce over the body to a great extent, forming an envelope of consid- erable thickness. They sometimes tend to become digitate, so that this species, together with #. Culicis, forms a connecting link between the simple and compound types. The species occurs not uncommonly in North Carolina on the under side of leaves in Lehododendron thickets; and I have found it occasionally in Maine near brooks or marshy places in woods, always on leaves. The specimen on Hyphantria textor (larva) was found at Burbank, E. Tenn., in one of the nests peculiar to these caterpillars; but, although there were many in the nest, I found no additional specimens attacked by the fungus. The cmnivorous character of the species is noticeable, and experiments with infections of different hosts are much to be desired, especially with aphides, since it is only by this means that the true relations between this and the succeeding form can be determined. Empusa Planchoniana (Cornu) ?. Pl. 15, figs. 76-78. Entomophthora Planchoniana, Cornu 1. c. A, pp. 189, 190; 7. c. B, foot-note, p. 4. Sor- okin J. c. C, p. 214. Conidia nearly spherical or broadly ovoid, with a papillate base which is sometimes furnished with a short sharp point. Average measurements 28-33, < 30-40,. Conid- tophores simple, partially coalescing over the host. Secondary conidia like the primary. Resting spores, azygospores, produced laterally or terminally, more commonly intersti- tially, from hyphae; spherical, or very irregular in the interstitial forms ; 35-50, in diameter. Host attached to substratum by the insertion of its proboscis. Hosts, Hemiptera: several genera of aphides. Habitat. Kittery, Maine; vicinity of Boston, Mass.; Europe. It is with much hesitation that I have placed under the above name a species occurring in this country commonly, yet never very abundantly, on numerous aphides infesting the white birch, Bidens and other plants, in late summer and autumn, associated as a rule with other species which attack the same hosts. It is sometimes found also associated with #. Aphidis in greenhouses where it may be found during the winter months. It is very nearly related to HL. apiculata, and, if not a variety of this species, forms a con- necting link between it and #. Grylli. It differs from H. apiculata chiefly in the ab- sence of rhizoids, which I have been unable to discover in fresh material after a careful search, as well as by the variability ofits conidia which are rarely pointed as in /. apicu- lata, and vary from a form nearly spherical to one not separable from that of even the longer forms of H. Grylli. The species may be placed under '. Planchoniana only pro- visionally as may be understood from the following descriptions of the last named spe- cies by Cornu. In speaking of the species,’ Cornu says that the conidiophores, issuing from the body Loe INE MEMOIRS BOSTON SOC. NAT. HIST., VOL. IV. 24 166 ROLAND THAXTER ON THE of the aphides, “donnérent naissance a une sphérule mucronée, remplie d’un plasma ré- fringent et au centre de laquelle apparaisait une spore en forme de toupie d’Allemagne. Dans lair humide les sporanges furent lancés au loin,” etc.: and in the only other place where I find the species characterized,’ he says “Cette espece parait characterisée par la production . . . de spores ovoides oblongues, sans sporanges, ou sporanges soudés a la spore” (the italics his). I am unable to reconcile these two descriptions or to determine whether the author here realizes what I consider to be the true morphology of the m- pusa conidium. ‘The phenomenon of the separation of the outer wall I have never seen in the round spored species of the “Gvylli” type to which the present form belongs, and such a separation so exceptional in any case, that its occurrence as a characteristic of the general morphology of any species is highly improbable. A “sphérule mucronée” may refer to a conidium of the “Muscae” type; yet since the conidia are characterized as in the form“ de toupie d’Allemagne” as well as “ ovoides oblongues” this seems doubtful. The last expression perhaps refers to another species on aphides (the common #. Aphi- dis) ; yet any opinion concerning the form to which L. Planchoniana belongs is purely conjectural, since the above quotations which furnish all the published data concerning the species are not of such a nature as to render its determination possible. Empusa papillata nov. sp. Pl. 15, figs. 82-90. Conidia broad-ovoid, evenly rounded, with a very large tongue-like slightly truneate papilla, clearly defined from the spore body. Average measurements 35 x 50,, maxi- mum 50 x 75,. Conidiophores stout, simple. Secondary conidia like the primary. Rest- ing spores azygospores (?), 45-55, in diameter, spherical, slightly brownish. Host at- tached to substratum by a few large rhizoids, terminating in a Se expansion. Hosts. Diptera: several minute gnats. Habitat. Mt. Washington, N. H.; Cullowhee, N.C. I first noticed this species on the wet Sphagnum surrounding a spring in the locality known as the Alpine Garden on Mt. Washington, where it occurred in July and August (1886). I also found a small number of specimens on very minute gnats in the beds of mountain brooks at Cullowhee, in company with several other species, which occurred on moist logs and in similar situations. The conidia sometimes attain a size greater than any other H’mpusa known to me and are peculiar for their prominent tongue-like papil- late base. They are formed usually in small numbers and are visible to the naked eye without difficulty. Like 2. apiculata, this form is peculiar for its few powerful rhizoids which attach the host firmly to the moss or other substratum on which it rests. It differs from the last-mentioned species in its much larger conidia which are of a more ovoid shape, while it apparently lacks entirely the sharp point peculiar to the basal papilla of EE. apiculata. It is not impossible that the form on Culex referred by Nowakowski to HE. Grylli may be the present species; yet, as previously mentioned, I am inclined to think that he refers to the species I have called EZ. conglomerata. The two forms, #. conglom- erata as above described and the present species, are, I think, quite distinct. 1. cB. ENTOMOPHTHOREAE OF THE UNITED STATES. 167 The resting spores of this species occurred in several specimens simultaneously with conidia, but were in every case too far advanced in their development to demonstrate their process of formation, which can hardly vary greatly from that of the nearly allied EE. apiculata. Empusa Caroliniana nov. sp. Pl. 16, figs. 91-105. Conidia ovoid, oblong or long elliptical, with rounded extremities, the base hardly sep- arable from the apex; without large oil globules; measuring 10 x 26,-—15 x 45y, average 14x 37,. Conidiophores simple, barely projecting beyond the body of the host between the body segments and from the thorax; originating directly from rounded hyphal bod- ies. Secondary conidia like the primary. esting spores (azygospores) spherical, hyaline, 37-55, in diameter, average 45, (?). Host attached to substratum by its legs. Hosts. Diptera: imagines of Tvpula sp. Habitat. North Carolina. This species is decidedly different from any form known to me and is easily recognized by its shapeless conidia which, although they are of the H’ntomophthora rather than H’m- pusa type, are borne on conidiophores which are rarely branched within the body of the host and are perfectly simple at their extremities; the hyphae swelling directly to a ba- sidium upon emerging. Specimens producing the fungus with the greatest luxuriance may therefore show little indication of its presence, and in dried material it is almost wholly invisible, the body segments closing over the basidia in shrinking. . i — Memoirs Boston Soc. Nat Hist. Vol. IV Plate XV RThaxter,del.ad nat. 5.Meisel. lith 49-55. TENTHREDINIS. 56-62. CONGLOMERATA. 2 62-75. -APICULATA. 76-81. PLAN CHONIANA 2 82-90. PAPILLATA. ff iy yee Memoirs Boston Soc.Nat Hist. Vol. IV Plate XVI RThaxter, del.ad nat. B Meisel. lith. 91-105. CAROLINIANA. 106-140. FRESENII. 141-160. LAGENIFORMIS. Memoirs Boston Soc.Nat Hist. Vol. IV Plate XVI -RThaxter,del.ad nat, BMeisel. liu 161-172. LAMPYRIDARUM. 173-178. GEQMETRALIS. 179-199. OCCIDENTALIS. 200-219. SPHA.ROSPERMA. Memoirs Baston Soc. Nat Hist. Vol. lV Plate XVI! ReThaxter,del ad nat B Meisel. lith. 220-240. APHIDIS. 241-250. DIPTERIGENA. 251-261. VIRESCENS. 262-273 AMERICANA 274-285. MONTANA. Memoirs Boston Soc.Nat Hist. Vol. IV Plate XIX Re AU PD € ny {hy AT] Z, \ SLB. NAL) 7 SMA 326 RThaxter, del ad nat. : B Meisel, lith 286-305. ECHINOSPORA. 306-326. SEPULCHRALIS. Memoirs Boston Soc.Nat Hist. Vol. IV 378 B Meisel, lith RThaxter, del ad nat. 347-378. RHIZOSPORA. 327-346. VARIABILIS. Plate XXI. Memoirs Boston Soc. Nat Hist. Vol. IV B Meisel, lith 4\0-413. RANARUM. 392-409. CONICA. 414-429. CICADINA. 379-391.GRACILIS. Blea t pean ei Pa ae De Oe . oe PUBLICATIONS OF THE BOSTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY. PROCEEDINGS. Vols. III, VI, VII, VIII, X, XI, per volume, $4.00. These volumes will be sold only in sets. Vols. XII-XXII per volume, cloth, $3.50 to members, $4.50 to the public. JOURNAL. 8vVvoO. Vol. I, part 2, $2.00; part 3, $1.50. “¢ TI, $6.50; Vol. II, part 1, $2.00; part 2, $2.00; parts 3-4, $3.00. “TV, part 2, $1.50; part 3, $1.50; part 4, $1.50. MEMOIRS. 4to. Being a new Series of the Journal. Subscription per quarter volume, averaging 130 pages, $3.50 — Vols. I, IJ and III, each with many plates, $14.00 to mem- bers, $16.00 to the public. Vol. IV is now being issued in separate articles as printed. SEPARATE ARTICLES, Volcanic Manifestations in New England. By Wm. T. Brig- ham. pp. 28. 50 cents. Early stages of Terebratulina. By Edward Two Steel Plates. pp. 12. $1.50. Usteology and Myology of Didelphys virginiana. By Elliot Coues. With an Appendix on the Brain. By Jeffries Wyman. pp. 114. $2.50. Development ef Limulus Polyphemus. By A. S. Packard, Jr. Three Steel Plates. pp. 48. $2.00. Description of Balenoptera musculus. By Thomas Dwight, Jr. Two Plates. pp. 28, $1.50. Fossil Myriapods from Nova Scotia. By 8. H. Scudder. “pp. 9. 35 cents. Note additionelle au Mémoire intitulé ‘* Volcanic Manifesta- tions in New England.” Par M. Albert Lancaster. pp. 9. 35 cents. Embryology of Terebratulina. By E. $8. Morse. Steel Plates. pp. 16. $1.50. List of the Birds of Western Mexico, by George N. Law- rence; with Notes on their Habits, ete., by A. J. Grayson. pp. 50. $1.25. ‘ Recent changes of Level ou the Coast of Maine. By N.S. Shaler. pp. 20. 40 cents. The Species of Pamphila. By SamuelH. Scudder. pp. 18. Two plates (one colored). $2.00. Antiquity of Caverns and Cavern Life of the Ohio Valley. By N.S. Shaler. pp. 9. One Plate. Monograph of the Tabanide, Pt.1. By C. R. Osten Sacken. pp. 338. 65 cents. Pt. 1. pp. 59. $1.00. Revision of North American Porifere, Pt.1. By A. Hyatt. pp. 10. One Plate. 75 cents. Pt. wu. Three plates. $2.00. S. Morse. Two Gynandromorphism in Lepidoptera. By A.S. Packard, Jy Structure and Transformations of Eumeus Atala. By S. H. Scudder. pp. 11. One Plate. 75 cts. Appendix, Index and Title-page to Vol. II. pp.17. 35 cents. 1 i THE ENTOMOLOGICAL CORRESPONDENCE OF Dr. T. W. Hy and 4 plates. 1869. Cloth, $4.50. - Il. Tae Seiwers or THE UNITED STATES. H. Emerton. 8vo. 21 Plates. $3.50; paper, $3.00. pages, 9 portraits, and 31 plates. Price, $15. traits, etc. Price, $5.00. | Vols. XXIII now issuing in quarterly parts, $3.00 to mem- = A few cemplete sets will be sold at special rates. Series now ended. Vol. V, part 1, $1.75. EXTRACTED FROM ‘TILE MEMOIRS, VOLS. Il TO IV. | New Hydroids from Chesapeake Bay. By S. 40 cents. | pp. 74.. | By N. M. Henrz. Edi 1875. Cloth, $3.50; Paper, $3.00. Ill. THe Grorocy or Massacnuserts. By W. O. CrosBy. 8vo. MEMORIAL VOLUME. FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY MEMOIRS, containing a history of the Society ; The HISTORY of the Soc s 8vo. (bound.) bers; $4.00 to the public. ‘ VI, $6.00; Vol. 6, part 1, $1.75; part 2, $1.50; part 3, $1.75; part 4, $1.25. “« VII, part 2, $1. 75; part 3, $1.50; part 4, $1.25. to members, $4.00 to the public. Five parts now ready. : f Distomuin crassicolle : with Notes on the Classification f Worms. By C. S. Minot. pp. 20. One Plate. 75 ce The Early Types of Insects. By S. H. Seudder. pp. 35 cents. Rg FEN EY Paleozoic Cockroaches. By Samuel H. Scudder. pp Five Plates. $3.00. es pp. 8. Three Plates. 75 cents. Carboniferous Myriapods. By S. H. Scudd plates. $2.00. oS at Embryology of Teleosts. By J. S. Kin pp. 30. Three Plates. $ Carboniferous Hexapod Insects Scudder. pp. 12. One Embryology of Gicanthus and pp. 56. Kight Plat New Carboniferous Myriap Affinities of AY G20 ree ‘ - J i; _ A ras ¥, igang hs Ph “a ra ef Pas