jgafeiBBia i?^?m Library of the University of Toronto Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from University of Toronto https://archive.org/details/historyofbritish00forb_0 A HISTORY OF BRITISH STARFISHES. A HISTORY OF BRITISH STARFISHES, AND OTHER ANIMALS OF THE CLASS ECHINODERMATA. By EDWARD FORBES, M.W. S. For. Sec. B. S. etc. ILLUSTRATED BY WOODCUTS. LONDON: JOHN VAN VOORST, 1, PATERNOSTER ROW; MDCCCXLI. LONDON ! PRINTED BY SAMUEL BENTLEY, Bangor House, Shoe Lane. PROFESSOR AGASSIZ IN ADMIRATION OF HIS SCIENTIFIC LABOURS, AND IN GRATITUDE FOR THE SERVICES HE HAS RENDERED TO THE NATURAL HISTORY OF BRITAIN, THIS VOLUME IS DEDICATED BY A BRITISH NATURALIST. . ' PREFACE. This History of the British species of a much neglected but beautiful and interesting class of animals originated in an attempt to revise the characters of such Starfishes as inhabit the Irish Sea, and to introduce the generic arrangements proposed by Professor Agassiz, which I laid before the Wernerian Society, with the approbation of its distinguished president, Professor Jameson, and which was published in 1839 in the eighth volume of its Transactions. Without the kind assistance of my brother naturalists, the materials for the following pages could not, however, have been gathered. To my friend Mr. John Goodsir I am especially indebted for assistance and ad- vice. From Mr. Thompson of Belfast a great portion of my information has been derived ; and the materials which he had been collecting for several years, in order to prepare an account of the Irish species, were most liberally, and without reserve, placed in my hands, as were, also, with like kindness, Mr. Robert Ball’s collections for an account of the Echinidse. In Scotland I have derived most valu- able aid from Professor Jameson, Dr. Johnston of Berwick, Vlll PREFACE. and Dr. P. Maclagan; in England from Mr. Alder, Mr. Bean of Scarborough, Mr. Bellamy of Plymouth, and Mr. Gray of the British Museum, and from many other gentlemen in both countries, and in the sister island, whose assistance I have recorded in the text. In Dublin Captain Portlock most liberally permitted me to examine the Ordnance col- lection. To all these gentlemen I return my fervent thanks, also to Professor Agassiz, who most kindly per- mitted me to make use of the notes he had made on the British collections of these animals during his last visit to our country. Nor must I forget favours of the pencil. To my friend Mr. G. J. Bell the volume is indebted for some of its most interesting embellishments : Mr. Alder and Mr. Thomp- son have also contributed to the ornamental part. The wood-cutting speaks for itself, — thanks to Mr. Bastin, who in the most praiseworthy manner made himself acquainted not merely with the drawings, but with the texture and appearance of the animals themselves, in order the better to express them. With three exceptions the figures of species are from my own drawings, and with a view to secure correctness were mostly drawn on the wood by myself. In the text I have endeavoured faithfully to do justice to preceding writers, and rarely have quoted a synonym which I have not myself verified. I have endeavoured to bring the subject as near as possible to the present state of science, and trust that few memoirs essential to my purpose have escaped me. I should have wished to have made more PREFACE. IX use than I have done of the valuable papers on the Echi- nidee by M. Desmoulins, but could lay hands on a portion of them only. Since I commenced the publication two papers have appeared which I must notice, as they add several to my enumeration of the synonyms of the Star- fishes. The one is a Memoir by one of the greatest living physiologists, Muller of Berlin, on the genera of the Star- fishes, read before the Berlin Academy in April 1840. This paper must he praised on account of the excellent way in which the characters of the genera are drawn up. The chief novelty is the employment of the anus of Star- fishes (or anal pore) as a source of family distinction, which aperture Muller describes as existing in all Starfishes saving Asterias proper, and a new genus, Hemichemis, which seems identical with my previously constituted Luidia. His genus Crossaster, also, is my Solaster, published the year before. Several generic names previously adopted by Agassiz and Nardo are wantonly changed ; thus, Uras- ter is turned into Asterocanthium, and Palmipes into As- teriscus, with which he unites Asterina. In this paper Muller maintains that one of the five intermediate inferior plates of the Ophiuridse bears a madreporiform tubercle, or rather corresponds to that body, a view which I am not inclined to adopt. The other Memoir to which I must allude is one by Mr. Gray on the Starfishes, which he calls the class Hypostoma, and defines somewhat ambiguously, published simultane- ously with my two first numbers, in the Annals of Natural History. I am afraid I must censure Mr. Gray for chang- X PREFACE. ing names still more than Muller, and with less reason. It is a pity zoologists do not take a lesson from their fellow labourers in the field of Nature, the botanists, in this respect. Mr. Gray has increased the confusion by giving fragments of descriptions instead of generic and specific characters, probably from carrying too far a laudable desire for brevity. His essay deserves praise, however, for re- cording many new foreign habitats of the beautiful animals he catalogues. INTRODUCTION. The Echinodermata constitute one of the three great classes into which the Radiata are divided. The radiate type presents us with animals which either have their parts arranged in a ray-like manner round a common centre, or have their bilaterality so modified as to give them a star- like form. The Zoophytes, the Medusse, and the creatures to which this volume is devoted, constitute the type. The Echinodermata are most highly organized, much more so than the Polypes ; they are almost all free animals, creep- ing about at the bottom of the sea ; and as the greater number of species are covered with a coriaceous skin, which is commonly strengthened by calcareous plates or spines, they have derived their general appellation from that re- markable character, which at once distinguishes them from the Medusa©, free swimming animals of the most delicate and membranous texture. Throughout animated Nature forms and structures merge into each other. While the central groups of a type pre- sent its essential characters, the more distant families approach in appearance and habits to the members of some other great class of forms. This is equally true respecting small as well as large groups. Thus, the class of Radiata before us presents examples, at one extreme, of animals truly symmetrical, and, at the other, of species which ap- proach either in general form or in their early life to the Amorphozoa, the lowest of animal types. For example, Xll INTRODUCTION. while the first state of a Oomatula is analogous to a sponge or a Polypidom, the highest groups of Ecliinodermata are creatures resembling Mollusca or Annellicla. Correspondent with the progression of form is the progression of organiz- ation and of sagacity. Externally, the majority of Echinodermata are radiated, and the lowest groups resemble Polypes. The first species figured in this history is the Feather-star, a creature which in its youth is fixed and pedunculate, like a Zoophyte ; in its adult state free and star-like. When dredging in Dub- lin Bay in August 1840, with my friends Mr. R. Ball and W. Thompson, we found numbers of the Phytocrinus or Polype state of the Feather-star, more advanced than they had ever been seen before, so advanced that we saw the creature drop from its stem and swim about a true Co- matula ; nor could we find any difference between it and the perfect animal, when examining it under the micro- scope. From the Comat ula we proceed onwards through forms gradually changing character, until in the Sea- Urchins we have the true representatives of the Echino- dermata. In them we have the perfection of an Echino- dermatous integument. We have arrived, as it were, at the summit of a pyramid, and we descend through a series of forms as gradually conducting us to the Mollusca and the V ermes. The Holothuriadse, which at first have the ap- pearance of soft Sea-Urchins, gradually change their forms, and become more and more Molluscan in character. The Sipunculidse progress in like manner towards the Annel- lida; and in the animals described last in this volume, we see Radiata, which have so put on the garb of worms that by many naturalists they have been classed as such. Every great class in the animal kingdom, when con- sidered anatomically or physiologically, may he looked on INTRODUCTION. Xlll as the completing of some organ or function, even as zoolo- gically it represents the completing of some important modification of form. In the lowest division of the Radi- ata, that of Zoophytes, the digestive system has passed through all its essential changes, therefore we do not see a true progression of the organs of that system among the Echinodermata. We find its variations depend rather on the circumstances under which the species are destined to live than on any progression of structure. Thus it appears anomalous at first, that the lowest Echinodermata should have digestive organs of more complicated nature than some higher tribes ; that the Feather-star should have an intestinal canal with two orifices, whilst all the Ophiuridse and many true Starfishes have but one ; or that the Splancno-skeleton (dental apparatus) of the Echinidse should be more highly developed than that of the Holo- thuriadse ; but looking at the system according to the view I have taken of its completion in a lower tribe, this is what we should expect. Not so, however, with all the functional systems. The respiratory goes through a series of modifications complicating as we advance, so also do the circulatory and the nervous. But it is the muscular which is especially presented in all its essential modifica- tions in the class before us, from the first appearance of a contractile tissue, as seen in the granular tissue of the lowest Echinodermata, to its perfect developement in the complicated muscular mechanism presented by many of the V ermigrade species. The system most characteristic of the Radiate type is the Aquiferous, or apparatus for a water circulation ; in- deed, it can scarcely be said to exist in any of the other types. It is chiefly developed in the Arachnodermata and Echinodermata, and in the last is intimately connected XIV INTRODUCTION. with the movements of the animals ; for it is by means of this water circulation that the suckers or cirrhi are enabled to act as organs of progression. In many species of the most typical group, that of Echinidse, we find a portion of the dermato-skeleton turned in, as it were, to form arches for the protection of the water-canals, thus evidencing their great importance in those creatures. Among the Annel- lidous Echinodermata, however, the aquiferous system seems altogether to disappear. On the modifications of this characteristic system, its presence or absence, and its combination with the tegu- mentary system for purposes of motion, I have founded my arrangement of the Echinodermata. I look upon the Echi- nodermata and Arachnodermata as two parallel groups, and hold it as a law that the divisions of parallel groups should be based on a common principle. The orders of the latter class have always been founded on the modifications of their organs and modes of progression : the orders of the class before us I have founded on the same consider- ation, and need only call the attention of the philosophical zoologist to the naturalness of the divisions so formed, and to their equidistance from each other, and I feel confident he will acknowledge the truth of my arrangement. Order I. Pinnigrada. Crinoide^e — First appearance of cirrhi, springing from brachial membranes, which, with the true arms, form the organs of motion. II. Spinigrada. Ophiurid.e — Disappearance of brachial membranes, cirrhi as before ; true arms clothed with spines for motion. III. Cirrhigrada. Asteriad.® — Arms disappear ; body more or less lobed, and lobes channeled beneath for cirrhi, which act as suckers, and are the organs of motion. INTRODUCTION. XV Order IV. Cirrhi-Spinigrada. Echinid^:— Gradual disappear- ance of lobes ; cirrhiferous canals appearing as avenues where cirrhi act as in Order III. but are assisted by mobile spines clothing the integument. V. Cirrhi- Vermigrada. Holothuriad^: — Lobes disap- pear ; motions effected by avenues of cirrhi, assisted by contraction and extension of the soft body. VI. Vermigrada. Sipunculhue — Cirrhi become obsolete and disappear ; motion effected by the contraction and extension of the animal’s body. A glance at this arrangement will at once show that it is most natural. There is nothing novel in it as regards the constitution of the groups, saving the recognition of the Ophiuridse as an order equivalent to the other orders ; but as an explanation of the true nature and relation of the Echinodermatous tribes, I prefer it to any arrangement at present used, and have accordingly followed it through- out this work. All the Radiata are greatly influenced in the arrangement of their parts by some definite number. In the Echino- dermata the reigning number is five. The name of 44 five- fingers,” commonly applied by mariners to the Starfishes, is founded on a popular recognition of the number regnant. It has long been noticed. Among the problems proposed by that true-spirited but eccentric philosopher, Sir Thomas Browne, is one, 44 Why, among Sea-stars, Nature chiefly delighteth in five points 2” and in his Garden of Cyrus he observes, “By the same number (five) doth Nature divide the circle of the Sea-star, and in that order and number disposeth those elegant semicircles or dental sockets and eggs in the Sea Hedge-hog.” Among the lower and the typical orders, we find this number regulating the num- ber of parts. Every plate of the Sea-Urchin is built up of XVI INTRODUCTION. pentagonal particles. The skeletons of the digestive, the aquiferous, and the tegumentary systems, equally present the quinary arrangement ; and even the cartilaginous framework of the disk of every sucker is regulated by this mystic number. When the parts of Echinoderms deviate from it, it is always either in consequence of the abortion of certain organs, or it is a variation by representation , that is to say, by the assumption of the regnant number of another class. Thus do monstrous Starfishes and Urchins often appear quadrate, and have their parts fourfold, as- suming the reigning number of the Actinodermata, con- sistent with a law in which I put firm trust, that when parallel groups vary numerically by representation they vary by interchange of their respective numbers. In this short introduction I have rather given the gene- ralities of the subject than details of structure, for which I would refer the reader to the excellent account of the anatomy of Echinodermata given by Professor Jones in his Outlines of the Animal Kingdom. I shall conclude by presenting a tabular view of the distribution of our native species. In the first of the two following tables, the numbers of species of each family known to inhabit the several zones of the sea is given ; in the second a view of their distribution in the various provinces of the British seas, with such foreign localities as are recorded. I have divided the marine provinces thus : — I. Thulean, including the Orkney and Shetland Isles. II. Hebridean. III. Scottish eastern coast. IV. English eastern coast. V. English Channel. VI. St. George’s Channel. VII. South- ern, the district between Land’s End and Cape Clear. VIII. South-west Irish. IX. North-west Irish. X. The Clyde province and North Channel. XI. The Irish Sea. INTRODUCTION. XVI.!. I. Table of Zonal Distribution. Zones of the Sea. Crinoidese. Ophiuridae. Asteriadae. Echinidse. Holothnriadae. s r2 3 o P P P CO Total. Littoral .... 0 4 6 3 1 2 16 Laminarian . . . 1 5 6 4 5 6 27 Coralline .... ] 9 11 7 12 2 42 Deep-sea Coral . . 0 3 3 3 ? ? 9 1) xvill INTRODUCTION, II. Table of the Geographical Distribution of the British Species of Echinodermata. Genera and Species. British Distribution. General Distribution. I. 1 PINNIGRADA. Comatula. Lam. rosacea. Link. I. II. VI. VII. X.XI. Scandinavia, Mediter- II. 1 SPINIGRADA. Ophiura. Lam. texturata. Lam. I.— XI. ranean. Scandinavia, Celtic, 2 albida. Forbes. I.— XI. Mediterranean. North Sea. III. 1 Ophiocoma. Agas. neglecta. Jobnst. I. III.-VI.VIII.-XI. 2 Ballii. Thomp. VI. 3 punctata. Forbes. III. 4 filiformis. Mul. VIII. X. Norway. 5 brachiata. Mont. V. X. 6 granulata. Link. I. V. VI. X. XI. Scandinavia. 7 bellis. Link. I.— VI. X. XI. Arctic and Scandina- 8 Goodsiri. Forbes. I. III. vian Seas. 9 rosula. Link. I — XI. Arctic, Scandinavian, 10 minuta. Forbes. VII. XI. Celtic, and Mediter- ranean Seas. IV. 1 Astrophyton. Link, scutatum. Link. I. VII. Arctic and Scandina- V. 1 CIRRHIGRADA. Ur aster. Agas. glacialis. Lin. II. VII. VIII. X. XI. vian Seas. Indian Ocean? Mediter. ? All the European seas. 2 rubens. Lin. I.— XU Throughout the seas 3 violacea. Mul. I.— IV. VI. VII. X. of Europe. Norwegian and Baltic 4 hispida. Pen. XI. II. III. X. XI. Seas. VI. 1 Cribella. Agas, oculata. Pen. I. — IV. VI. VII. X. Norway ? West of 2 rosea. Mul. XI. VII. X. France. VII. 1 Solaster. Forbes, endeca. Lin. I.III.IV.VI.VII.XI. Scandinavia. 2 papposa. Lin. I.— XI. Scand. and Celt. Seas. Mediter. ? Asia ? INTRODUCTION. XIX Genera and Species. British Distribution. General Distribution VIII. Palmipes. Link. 1 membranaceus. Retz. IV. VII. X. XI. Arctic, Scandinavian. and Mediter. Seas IX. Asterina. Nardo. 1 gibbosa. Pen. II. V.— XI. Celt. & Mediter. Seas. X. Goniaster. Agas. 1 Templetoni. Thomp. I.V.VII. X. XI. 2 equestris. Gmel. III. IV. VII. North Sea. XI. Asterias. Lin. 1 aurantiaca. Lin. I. III.— XI. All the European seas. XII. Luidia. Forbes, fragilissima. Forbes. I. III. IV. VII. VIII. X. XI. CIRRHI-SPINI- GRADA. XIII. Cidaris. Leske. 1 papillata. Flem. I. Norway. XIV. Echinus. Lin. 1 sphaera. Mul. I.— XI. Arctic, Northern, and Celtic Seas. 2 miliaris. Leske. I.— VII. X. XI. 3 Flemingii. Ball. I. VII. 4 lividns. Lam. VIII. IX. Mediter. Portugal ? 5 neglectus. Lam. I. West of France. XV. Echinocyamus. Leske. 1 pusillus. Mul. I.— XI. Norway. West of France. XVI. Echinarachnius. Leske. 1 placenta. Gmel. Spatangus. Klein. I. Canada, Asia ? XVII. 1 purpureus. Mul. I. III. IV. VI. XI. Scandinavia, Mediter- ranean. XVIII. Brissus. Klein. 1 lyrifer. Forbes. X. XIX. Amphidotus. Agas. 1 cordatus. Pen. I.— XI. Northern seas. 2 roseus. Forbes. I. III.VI.VII.X.XI. CIRRHI-VERMI- GRADA. XX. Psolus. Oken. 1 phantapus. Lin. I. III.— V. X. XI, Norway. XXI. Psolinus. Forbes. 1 brevis. F. and G. I. X. XXII. Cucumaria. Blainv. 1 frondosa- Gunner. I. III. Norway. 2 pentactes. Mul. III.— V. X. Northern and Celtic Seas. 3 communis. F. and G. III. VII. X. 4 fusiformis. F. andG. I. 5 hyalina. Forbes. I. 6 Drummondii. Thomp. X. 7 Hindmanni. Thomp. VIII. X. 8 fucicola. F. and G. I. XX INTRODUCTION. Genera and Species. British Distribution. General Distribution. XXIII. Ocnus. F. and G. 1 brunneus. Forbes. III. X. XI. 2 lacteus. F. and G. I. III. X. XXIV. Thyone. Oken. 1 papillosa. Mul. I. III. VIII. X. XI. Norway. 2 Portlockii. Forbes. X. XXV. Chirodota. Esch. 1 digitata. Montagu. V. VERMIGRADA. XXVI. Syrinx. Bohadsch. 1 nudus. Lin. IV. V. VII. Celtic Seas. Mediter. 2 papillosus. Thomp. .VIII. XI. West Indies. 3 Harveii. Forbes. V. XXVII. Sipunculus. Lin. 1 Bemhardus. Forbes. I. XI. Norway, France. 2 Johnstoni. Forbes. III. V. ? XXVIII. Priapulus. Lam. 1 caudatus. Lam. I. III. IV. X. Arctic and Scandina- vian Seas. XXIX. Thalassema. Cuv. 1 Neptuni. Gaertner. IV. XXX. Echiurus. Cuv. 1 vulgaris. Savig. III. Belgic coast. BRITISH ECHINODERMATA. CRINOIDEAC, OR PINNIGRADE ECHINODERMATA. One of the most remarkable phenomena displayed to us by the researches of the geologist, is the evidence of the existence, in primaeval times, of animals and plants, the analogies of which are now rare or wanting on our lands and in our seas. Among those tribes which have become all but extinct, but which once presented numerous generic mo- difications of form and structure, the order of Crinoid Star- fishes is most prominent. Now scarcely a dozen kinds of these beautiful animals live in the seas of our globe, and B 2 CRIN0IDEJ3. individuals of these kinds are comparatively rarely to be met with : formerly they were amon'g the most numerous of the ocean’s inhabitants, — so numerous that the remains of their skeletons constitute great tracts of the dry land as it now appears. For miles and miles we may walk over the stony fragments of the Crinoidese ; fragments which were once built up in animated forms, encased in living flesh, and obeying the will of creatures among the loveliest of the inhabitants of the ocean. Even in their present disjointed and petrified state, they excite the admiration not only of the naturalist but of the common gazer ; and the name of Stone-lily popularly applied to them, indicates a popular appreciation of their beauty. To the philoso- pher they have long been subjects of contemplation as well as of admiration. In him they raise up a vision of an early world, a world the potentates of which were not men but animals — of seas on whose tranquil surfaces myriads of convoluted Nautili sported, and in whose depths millions of Lily-stars waved wilfully on their slender stems. Now the Lily-stars and the Nautili are almost gone ; a few lovely stragglers of those once-abounding tribes remain to evidence the wondrous forms and structures of their com- rades. Other beings, not less wonderful, and scarcely less graceful, have replaced them ; while the seas in which they flourished have become lands, whereon man in his columned cathedrals and mazy palaces emulates the beauty and symmetry of their fluted stems and chambered shells. Throughout the animal kingdom we find groups which, when compared with a neighbouring group of equal value, present higher affinities and yet lower analogies. The order before us is a good example, and may serve as an explanation of this rather obscure-sounding doctrine. The CRINOIDEiE. 3 Crinoids as analogues of the Polypes are lower than the Asteroids, but as allies of the Asteroids are their superiors. An Encrinite is a Polype-like Starfish. Suppose, as Pro- fessor Jones has well suggested, an Ascidioid Zoophyte strengthened by depositions of calcareous matter in its arms and stems, and you have a Orinoid Starfish. In that point of view the latter is a link between the Echi- noderms and the Polypes. But the link is, as it were, lateral — a link of analogy — for the Ascidioid Polypes themselves are higher in their organisation than many Echinoderms. Their digestive system is more developed than that of the Starfishes. In them we see for the first time Echinoderms with two openings to their digestive canal. Their generative system is spread over the tegu- mentary covering of their body and arms, they have tentacular filaments like those of the Ophiurse; and the pinnae with which the arms are furnished, have the skin so developed on their sides as to enable them to serve as fins wherewith the animal can swim through the water in the manner of the Medusae, whence the name of Pinni- grade Echinoderms which I have applied to them, in- dicative of this mode of progression. It will be seen in the account of the Comatula , or Feather-star, that we believe that animal to be fixed and stable, like one of the fossil Encrinites, when it is young. At the same time it is very probable that there are Cri- noids which are stalked throughout life, and that most of the fossil species were of such a nature. Tribes which form a link between one mode of existence and another, generally present examples of both and combinations of both. Thus among the Polypes do we find in the family Tubulariadse the connecting link between the naked and clothed Hydroid Polypes, animals which are naked CRINOIDEJE. throughout life, others naked through a part of their existence, and others which are enclosed in a tube throughout their lives. In like manner may we expect to find in the order of Crinoidese animals fixed through- out life, others fixed through a portion of their existence only, and others which are free almost from their births. As yet, however, we know so little of the history of the tropical species that we cannot pronounce with certainty, and at present we can only recognise two families of Crinoids as properly constituted, such as are stalked as the Encrinites and the Comatula , and such as are sessile, as the genus Holopus of M. D’Orbigny. This division can only be regarded as provisional. ROSY FEATHER-STAR. 5 CRINOIDEJE. Genus Comatula. Lamarck. Generic Character. — Body haying five bifurcated pinnated arms : when adult, free, with simple filiform jointed appendages attached to the sides of its dorsal disk. When young, fixed on a long simple jointed (pentangular) stalk. (Phy- tocrinus.) ROSY FEATHER-STAR. Comatula rosacea. Link. Specific Character. — Bays dorsally rounded, with only two joints below the bifurcation of each. Link, p. 55, t. xxxvii. f. 66. Encyc. pi. cxxiv. f. 6. Link, t. xxxvii. f. 65. Stella (< decameros ) rosacea , Stella ( decameros ) harhata , 6 CRINOIDEiE. Asterias bifida and A. decacnemos , Pennant, Brit. Zool. IV. pp. 65, 66, No. 70, 71, tab. xxxiii. f. 71. Adams, Lin. Trans. V. 10. Lam. 1 Edit. II. p. 535. 2 Edit. III. p. 210. Saks, Beslc. og Jagt. p. 40, pi. viii. fig. 19. Fleming, Brit. An. p. 460. Blainv. Man. d’Actin. p. 248. Forbes, Wem. Mem. VIII. p. 128. Fleming, Brit. An. p. 490. Miller, Crinoideae, p. 132, pi. i. Leach, Zool. Misc. II. p. 62. Thompson, Mem. on. Pentac. Eur. t. i. and ii. Edin. Phil. Journ. vol. xx. p. 35, pi. ii. Fleming, Brit. Anim. p. 490. Buckland’s Bridg. Tr. pi. lii. f. 2. Blainv. Man. d’Actin. p. 255, pi. xxvii. f. 1—8. After what I have said of the former importance of the Crinoid Starfishes in the economy of the world, it need scarcely he remarked that the history of the only Crinoid animal at present inhabiting our seas, at one time so full of those beautiful and wonderful creatures, must present many points of great interest not to the zoologist only, but also to the geologist. And in truth the history of the Feather-star, — for so on account of its plumose ap- pearance I would designate the Starfish called by na- turalists Comatula , — is one of the little romances in which natural history abounds, one of those narrations which, while believing, we almost doubt, and yet, while doubt- ing, must believe. Nevertheless, there is nothing incon- sistent with the creature’s position in the animal kingdom in the account of the developement of the Comatula ; but before speaking of that subject, it is best we describe the animal in all its parts. The adult Comatula consists of a cup-shaped calcareous base, in the concavity of which is placed a soft body, and on the convexity a number of slender, jointed, simple arms. The base branches into five arms, which very soon bifur- Asterias pectinata , Comatula Mediterranean Comatula rosacea , Comatula barbata , Comatula fimbriata , Alecto Europcea , Junr. Pentacrinus Eur op ecus , Phytocrinus Europeans, ROSY FEATHER-STAR. 7 cate, so that as the two branches of each arm are very long, and the undivided part extremely short, the animal appears to be ten-armed. These arms are pinnated with single pinnse, each of which bears a membranous expansion and other organs, all which parts we must now examine in detail. 1. The cup-shaped base is very convex on one side, and deeply concave on the other. The convex part consists of a somewhat pentangular disk or true base, and five sides or surfaces. The disk is smooth, but the sides are punc- tate, with concave hexagonal impressions, the largest of which are lowest. These are the sockets of the filaments, which vary in number according to the age of the animal, being from twenty to thirty in one full grown. There are also perforations on these punctate sides, which seem to be the openings of canals branching out from five main canals, which proceed from near the bottom of the con- cavity or cup. The disk is imperforate ; but when we make a section of the cup, we find a funnel-shaped cavity, which extends very nearly to the surface of the centre of the disk. The concavity of the cup presents ten canali- culated radiating ribs, five of which are more depressed than the others. 2. The filaments, jointed appendages, or simple arms, with which the convexity of the base is furnished, are calcareous and jointed ; the joints a little concave in the middle, and thickest at each end, so that the articulations have a slightly knotted appearance. These filaments are not all alike ; there are two kinds of them. The larger have fourteen joints, and a small, thick, blunt, curved claw, which is smaller than the joints and has a horny lustre : the smaller filaments have eighteen rough joints, and an almost straight claw, which is larger than the joints pre- ceding it. 8 CRIN OIDEiE . 1, Part of an arm with two pinnae. 2, A single pinna. 3, One of the ten- tacula. 4, Claw at the extremity of a pinna. 5, Claw of a filiform pro- cess : all magnified. 3. The arms are five, but bifurcate shortly after their origin, each of the bifurcations being very long and taper- ing to its extremity. Before bifurcating the arms are simple ; but the bifurcations are pinnated with calcareous, jointed, slender pinnae, which, when fully developed, con- sist each of from twenty-two to twenty-four perforated joints, and a claw of five or six crooked finger-like hooks at the end. The joints are rough as if covered with short spiculae ; but the claws are smooth. The arms consist of calcareous joints with sloping diagonal segments, which can be separated from each other even as the joints can. The joints of the pinnae are sometimes similarly con- structed. In a full-grown Feather-star there are thirty- four pinnae on each side of each bifurcation. ROSY FEATHER-STAR. 9 4. The soft parts consist of the stomach, which is placed in the concavity of the cup, and of a membrane and ap- pendages which cover the surface of the stomach, and ramify over the arms and along the pinnae. The stomach is thin and membranous, and opens externally by a sub- central mouth, the margins of which are crenate. From its side, opening into it by a rather small aperture, pro- ceeds an intestine, which winds round the body, and opens externally by a laterally-placed proboscis-shaped anus, the aperture of which is round, crenate, and wide, though not so wide as at the base. This curious vent has been mis- taken by many authors for a mouth, and has greatly puzzled others ; and M. de Blainville suggested that it might be connected with the functions of respiration or generation : but any one who examines the Comatula alive, or dissects a specimen well preserved, will not doubt it is a true vent. The membrane or skin which covers the stomach is also the covering of the arms, and branches out to the extremity of their pinnae. It is channelled in the following manner : — From the mouth proceed five canals, fringed at their edges, which radiate and bifur- cate, though not equally, in order to run up the bi- furcations of the arms ; for, looking at the body from above, the origins of the arms are hidden. These canals run up the arms to their extremities, and also to the extremities of all their pinnae ; and the membranes which depend from the pinnae are very ample, and furnished with numerous long white pinnated tentacula or cirrhi. At certain seasons this membrane bulges out on the pinnae, and is then filled with white milky globules ; but at all times the margins of the canals, on the body, on the arms, and on the pinnae, are studded with round brown dots, placed in regular rows and at regular distances. They 10 CRINOIDE J3. are not, however, all of the same size, nor placed on all parts equally distant from each other ; for on the body they are small, and the margins of the canals appear lineated with them, but on the arms and pinnae they are larger and more distant. On the extreme pinnae they are very small, proportionate to the length of the pinna and the developement of the membrane, for their number is the same on all the pinnae. Thus, as there are thirty- four pinnae on each side of each of the ten bifurcations of the arms, and eighty-four brown spots in each, the whole ten armlets will present the great number of 57,120 of these spots, which appear to be the animal’s ovaries. The white milky fluid, on the contrary, would seem to be seminal, as minute rounded, active animalcules are seen in it when a drop is highly magnified. The whole of the animal is of a deep rose colour, dotted by these brown ovaries, and fringed with the transparent cirrhi. The description here given I have carefully drawn up from specimens before me, taken by myself in the Irish Sea, without adding several points observed by other describers, but which I have not seen. M. Sars says there “ are found on the upper part of each arm, above the proper fins, on each side, four or five thinner cylindrical thread-like fins (or pinnae) of greater or less length, some consisting of seven or eight, others of nearly twenty calcareous joints, which are also furnished with feet” (cirrhi). M. Dujardin states that the inferior or ventral surface of the arms and pinnae is provided with a double range of fleshy tentacula, protected by a double range of fleshy lamellae, presenting between them a furrow filled with papillae furnished with vibratile cilia, by the motions of which animalculae and microscopic vegetables are conducted along the arms to the mouth, in order to ROSY FEATHER-STAR. 11 serve as food for tlie animal. This observation I cannot confirm, not having ever found any vibratile cilia on this animal, saving on the walls of its stomach. Several authors state that besides the stomach and intestine, the body is provided with a liver. “ In the months of May and June,” says Mr. J. V. Thompson, “ the full-grown Comatula, have the mem- branous expansion inside each of the pinnae considerably extended, at least as far as the fifteenth or twentieth pair ; these, which are the matrices or conceptacula, at length show themselves distended with ova, which in July, or even earlier, make their exit through a round aperture on the facial side of the conceptaculum, still, however, ad- hering together in a roundish cluster of about a hundred each by means of the extension and connection of their umbilical cords.” And now commences the strange chapter in the history of the F eather-star ; a history which has excited much dis- cussion in the world of science. In the year 1823, Mr. J. V. Thompson discovered in the Cove of Cork, a singular little pedunculated crinoid animal, which he named Pentacrinus Europaus. This creature was taken attached to the stems of Zoophytes of different orders. It measured about three-fourths of an inch in height, and resembled a minute Gomatula mounted on the stalk of a 12 CRINOIDE^E. Pentacrinus. The discovery excited great interest both at home and abroad ; for it was the first animal of the Encrinite kind which had been seen in the seas of Europe, and the first recent Encrinite which had ever been examined by a competent observer in a living state. The base of its column, which was flexible and bent, and twisted itself at the will of the animal, was expanded into a convex calcareous plate, by which it attached itself to foreign bodies. From the centre of the plate arose the column, built up of about twenty- four joints, and somewhat thicker towards its upper extremity than at the lower. Round its uppermost joints, springing from the base of its cup-like body, was a row of jointed filaments with hooked extremities. The body bore five bifurcating arms, each bifurcation consisting of about twenty-four joints, in the older specimens pinnated, in the younger simple. Along’ the sides of each arm were rows of dark spots, and from the membrane of the arms proceeded fleshy flexible ten- tacula. The body resembled that of Comatula in its structure, having a separate mouth and proboscidiform lateral anus. The youngest specimens found had neither column nor arms, but appeared like little clubs fixed by a spreading base, and sending out from their summits a few pellucid tentacula. Dr. Fleming first proposed the generic separation of this animal from Pentacrinus , and suggested the propriety of associating it with Comatula by an im- proved definition of the family Comatulida. M. de Blain- ville afterwards constituted for its reception the genus Phytocrinus , and associated it with the Encrinites. But in 1836, Mr. J. V. Thompson published a second memoir on the subject in the Edinburgh New Philosophical Jour- nal, communicating the results of further researches. In ROSY FEATHER-STAR. 13 that paper he maintained the proposition that his Penta- crinus Europaus was only the young of Comatula ; that the Feather-star commenced life as an Encrinite, and thus, as it were, changed its nature from a pseudo-polype to a Starfish. He there compares the youngest Comatula he had met with, with the oldest Pentacrinus , and shows the gradual progression of form during the developement of the latter towards the adult state of the former, the de- velopement of the arms, the gradual appearance of the pinnse and the original absence of dorsal filaments, and the increase in their number as the animals of each kind grow older. He figures an advanced Pentacrinus just beginning to form pinnse, and compares it with the figure of the youngest Comatula he had ever obtained by dredging, and remarks, “ In the Pentacrinus it is to be observed that the arms are just beginning to form pinnse towards their extremities; that they have the sulphur yellow colour and dark marginal spotting observable in the other, which shews in like manner that the upper pinnse are first formed.” Afterwards the dorsal cirrhi are increased from five to nine. Comatulse “ a little older are comparatively common in which the pinnse are complete, and from this period they appear to form regularly at the apex of the arm as this goes on extending in length. These small Comatula still retain the original sulphur yellow colour towards the apices of the arms, the lower part and body assuming the characteristic red of the adult Comatula. From observations repeatedly made,” says Mr. J. V. Thompson, “ I think it most probable that the Comatula attain their full growth in one year so as to be in a con- dition to propagate their kind the summer following that of their birth.” Further on he remarks: — “ Another cir- cumstance confirmatory of these being the young of Co- 14 CRINOIDE.E. matula is derived from these Pentacrini being first seen about the time of the dispersion of the ova of the Comatula, and again entirely disappearing in September, the only season in which young Comatula are to he obtained.” “ By what means the ova are dispersed, or how they become attached to the stems and branches of corallines, remains to he discovered ; but it is strongly to be sus- pected that the animal is gifted with the power of placing them in appropriate situations, otherwise we should find them indiscriminately on fuci, shells, stones, &c. which does not appear to be the case. However this may be, if we are allowed to assume that the Pentacrinus Europaus is the young of Comatula , we first perceive the dispersed and attached ova in the form of a flattened oval disk, by which it is permanently fixed to the spot selected, giving exit to an obscurely-pointed head, in which individual the animal is sufficiently advanced to show the incipient formation of the arms and the mouth, with its tentacula, by means of which it obtains the food necessary for its successive growth.” Although the change of the Pentacrinus into the Feather- star has never been seen, yet the arguments of the dis- coverer of the former appear to me sufficiently to warrant the union of these two animals as one species in different states. I feel more confident in expressing this belief since I know that the identity of the Comatula and Penta- crinus is held by Mr. Thompson of Belfast, and Mr. Ball of Dublin, two gentlemen who have examined the latter animal under the most favourable circumstances, and who exhibited the creature alive to the members of the Natural History Section of the British Association during its session in Dublin. Through the kindness of the former of those naturalists I have been enabled to examine several ROSY FEATHER-STAR. 15 specimens of Pentacrinus Europaus preserved in spirits, also some very young Comatula. In one of Mr. Thomp- son’s specimens of the latter, I found the basal disk con- centrically ribbed, and presenting traces of a central per- foration. Its pentangular form would lead us to suppose that the column of the young animal is of the same shape. The column of the Pentacrinus Europaus examined was very long compared with the body, and composed of eighteen joints. Under the microscope it appeared of a granular texture. When compressed between plates of glass and highly magnified, the substance of the column and body presented a beautiful reticulated appearance, in consequence of the separation of the plates of calcareous matter with which it was studded. These plates were mostly pentagonal. They are themselves composed of little calcareous particles, each of which also appears to be pentangular ; but they adhere more firmly together than the plates do to one another. The same peculiar regular granular structure is seen in the calcareous sub- stance of other Echinodermata, especially when the animal is young ; and such a structure is very favourable to the spheroidal growth of these creatures. The adult Comatula frequents both deep and shallow water. In deep water we find them full grown ; and when dredging in such a situation I have never seen a small one. In the region of Laminarise they abound in several lo- calities, and there are found of all sizes, in company with the stalked form or Phytocrinus. Probably they frequent those forests of sea-weeds for breeding purposes at certain seasons, and retire to the deep sea at other times. We are told by Mr. J. Y. Thompson that Comatula swims like a Medusa. “ In swimming,” he says, “ the move- ments of the arms of the Comatula exactly resemble the 16 CRINOIDE^E. alternating stroke given by the Medusa to the liquid element, and has the same effect, causing the animal to raise itself from the bottom, and to advance back foremost even more rapidly than the Medusa.” I have observed that they effect the movement by advancing the arms alternately, five at a time. The stalked young are not only found on corallines, as Mr. J. V. Thompson sup- posed. Mr. W. Thompson finds them on the leaves of fuci, and remarks that they are very active animals on their pedicles. The Rosy Feather-star is found on many parts of the British coast. It was sent to Link by Llwyd from Pen- zance, was found at Milford Haven by Mr. Miller, in Wales by Mr. Adams, and on the west coast of Scotland by our distinguished zoologist, Pennant. I have never heard of its being found on the eastern shores, though in Shetland Mr. Goodsir and I found several in ten fathoms water on Laminarise, the roots of which they were grasp- ing with their dorsal filaments or claws, their arms winding among the branches and twining round them. In the Irish Sea I have often dredged large ones in twenty fathoms’ water at some, distance from land. In Ireland Mr. Ball finds it abundant on the Dublin coast, Mr. J. V. Thomp- son at Cork, and Mr. W. Thompson on the shores of Antrim and Down. Mr. Ball and Mr. William Thomp- son dredged it in company with the stalked young off Ireland’s Eye, near Dublin, attached to Delesseria san- guined. A plant of Halidrys siliquosa brought up by the latter gentleman at the entrance of Strangford Lough in October 1839, had about twenty full-grown Comatula attached to it. Two species of Comatula are given as British in most works on British zoology, — the Comatula rosacea , having ROSY FEATHER-STAR. 17 thirty dorsal filaments ; and the Comatula barbata , having only ten. They are evidently the same animal, of different ages, or in different states of preservation, as may be seen at once by referring to the figures given of each. They are both identical with the Comatula Mediterranea of Lamarck. A Feather-star is a very different animal when preserved in spirits with its expanded fins, from what it appears when dried. The range of the Rosy Feather- star extends from Norway to the shores of the Medi- terranean. When a freshly-caught Feather-star is plunged into cold fresh water, it dies in a state of contraction ; but if not so killed, or else if not killed in spirits, it breaks itself into pieces like an OpMura. When dying, either in fresh water or in spirits it gives out a most beautiful purple colour which tinges the liquid in which it is killed. This colour is retained a long time in spirits. The fact was long ago noted by Bartholinus, who observed it at Naples, and whose observations on it will be found in a note to Fabius Columna. Mr. J. Y. Thompson has the following note on a curious animal, which is parasitic on the Feather-star: — “Con- nected with the natural history of the Comatula is that of a nondescript parasite, which appears to be a complete zoological puzzle, as it is not possible to determine from its figure and structure to what class it ought to be referred, its natural size not exceeding that of the breadth of the ossicula of the arms of the Comatula : it resembles a flat scale, and runs about with considerable velocity on the arms of the animal, and occasionally protrudes a flexible tubular proboscis, ending in a papillary margin. The disk or body is surrounded by eighteen or twenty 18 CRINOIDEiE. retractile and moveable tentaculi, and beneath is fur- nished with five pairs of short members, each ending in a hooked claw. — Query, is it a perfect animal, or a larva? and does it belong to the Crustacea, the Annelides, or what 2” The vignette represents the upper surface of the body of the Feather-star magnified, from a sketch by Mr. Tem- pleton. OPHIURIDiE. 19 OPHIURIM5, OR SPINIGRADE ECHINODERMATA. These Starfishes are so named from the long serpent, or worm-like, arms which are appended to their round, de- pressed, urchin-like bodies. Naturalists have associated them with true Starfishes, and made them a family of Asteriadse ; but in reality they are as distinct from those animals as they are from the Crinoid Starfishes. In fact, they hold the same relation to the Crinoidese that the true Starfishes hold to the Sea-Urchins. They are S 'pini- grade animals, and have no true suckers by which to walk, their progression being effected (and with great facility) by means of five long flexible-jointed processes, placed at regular distances round their body, and fur- nished with spines on the sides and membranous tentacula. These processes are very different from the arms of the true Starfishes, which are lobes of the animal’s body; whereas the arms of the Ophiuridse are superadded to the body, and there is no excavation in them for any pro- 20 OPHIURIDiE. longation of the digestive organs. The stomach is a sac’ with one aperture, its walls externally covered with vibratile cilia. The ovaries are not branched ; they are placed near the arms, and open by orifices near the month, between the origins of the arms. Their investing mem- brane is also ciliated; but on the rest of the body and arms no cilia exist — hence we may conclude there is no separate respiratory system. The Ophiuridse are always regularly radiate, and they seldom vary in the number of their parts. With them the number five is absolute. Colour and proportions are the subjects of variation in this order. Generic characters among them are founded on the simplicity or complexity of the arms, the mode of their insertion, and on the forms of the plates which separate their origins beneath. The sources of specific character are derived from the spines and scales of the body and arms, and the proportions of arms and disk. Colour is variable in all the known species. What I take to be the nervous system will be found described under the account of Ophiocoma bellis. There is no appearance of ocular spots in the animals of this order. The Ophiurida are very generally distributed through the seas of our earth, both of its northern and southern hemispheres. The species do not present such wide ranges as the true Starfishes. They are more affected by climatal causes, which seem to influence their size, they being largest in the tropical seas. In our own seas they are very abundant, and are among the most curious and beautiful game pursued by the dredger. Among the relics of the Radiata of the primaeval seas we find several species of Ophiuridse. No extreme change 1ms taken place OPHIURIDJE. 21 in the forms of the family since the extinction of the species found fossil. The British Ophiuridse belong to two families, that of Ophiura and that of Euryales. The animals of the former family have simple arms ; those of the latter, arms rami- fying into many processes. 22 OPHIURiE. OPHIURIDJE. OPHIURJE. Genus Ophiura. Lam. Ag. Generic Character. — Rays simple, squamose, prolonged into the disk superiorly, and separated at their origins beneath by large shield-shaped plates. (Cirrhi simple.) COMMON SAND-STAR. Ophiura texturata. Lam. Specific Character. — Pectinated scales clasping the bases of the rays with more than twenty teeth. Inferior intermediate plates hollowed out at the sides. Lateral ray-plates each bearing seven spines. Asterias Ophiura , Linn. Muller, Zool. Dan. Prod. 2840. Asterius lacertosa, Penn. Brit. Zool. IV. p. 63. Ophiura texturata, Lam. Anim. sans Vert. 1 Edit. II. p. 542 ; 2 Edit. III. p. 221. Blainv. Man. d’Actin. p. 243. Forbes, Wem. Trans, vol. VIII. p. 125. pi. iv. f. 3, 4. COMMON SAND-STAR. 23 Ophiura bradeata , Flem. Brit. Anira. p. 488. Johnston, in Mag. Nat. Hist. VIII. p. 465, f. 41. Ophiura Aurora , Risso, Eur. Merid. V. p. 273, f. 29. Ophiura arenosa , Leach, Zool. Misc. II. p. 58. Stella lacertosa , Link, p. 47, tab. ii. No. 4. Professor Agassiz very properly proposed the generic separation of the lacertose from the worm-armed Ophiurse. The habits and characters of each are equally distinct. The true Ophiura live in sandy places. Their preference of such a locality is amusingly enough accounted for by Reaumur, who tells us that, because they are so fragile they are not able to live among rocks, and therefore in- habit sand : — a true closet reason ; had he only walked to the sea-shore, he would have seen the Ophiocomse, which are far more brittle, in abundance among the rocks, moving about in perfect safety. Natural, however, as is the ge- nus, the character, as restricted by Professor Agassiz, is quite inapplicable, and might serve as a warning against the dangerous practice of defining genera of radiated ani- mals without reference to their habits and appearance when alive. “ Disk much flattened ; rays simple, squa- mose, bearing very short spines adhering to the rays.” The disk is only flat in the dried specimen. When the animal is alive, it pouts it out so as to make it very convex ; in fact, the disk is much more moveable than in the next species. The spines are quite as long as those of many species of Ophiocoma , and are only appressed when the animal is dead : when it is alive, they stand out as in a Brittle-star ; but as they are placed in a different manner on the lateral ray-plate, — or rather as the lateral ray-plates are somewhat imbricated, — they naturally close on the ray when the animal has no power over them. The cirrhi, which are placed between the rows of spines, are long, simple, and very flexible. Round the mouth there 24 0PHIURJ3. are twenty tentacula similar in form and nature to tlie cirrhi ; in fact, the ten exterior (for ten are within the month) are so many of the cirrhi of the lowest joints of the rays applied to another purpose. The uses of these tentacula are curious. Not only do they serve to convey food to the mouth, hut they also serve to eject the matter digested. They are continually in motion, waving up and down ; and every now and then when the stomach pouts up and ejects some digested matter, the lowermost or inner tentacula shovel it up, and the uppermost or outer clear it away. This is done with great regularity ; and it is a very curious sight, for not only are the motions and ac- tions of the tentacula admirable, but when the stomach swells, there appear bright orange stripes of a most vivid metallic lustre running along its surface, with an almost phosphorescent gleaming. The Ophiura texturata has a regular round disk, into which the arms are as it were dovetailed above. This disk is covered with small smooth scales, rosulated in the centre, round which many of the scales are exceedingly small. Opposite the insertion of each ray are two trian- gular plates which diverge and are separated from each other throughout their lengths by two large transverse scales. The rays are long, tapering to a very fine extre- mity, and obtusely carinate. The scales which cover them are very broad and narrow. Beneath they are clothed with small lenticular plates. The marginal plates are pro- minent and rounded ; those nearest the base bear seven short flattened obtuse spines, those uppermost longest ; but the number diminishes with the breadth of the rays. The scales of the disk clasping the bases of the rays, bear from twenty to twenty-five teeth or little spines. The plates between the origins of the rays beneath are large COMMON SAND-STAR. 25 and fiddle-shaped. The disk of the largest specimen I have taken was nine-tenths of an inch broad ; and the rays vary from three times the length of the disk’s breadth, or even less, to five times as large. The disk is generally reddish, marbled with purple-brown ; the sides white ; and the under surface and spines are generally pale yellowish, or white. Dr. Johnston records a remarkable variety or rather monstrosity, having a square disk and four rays, the other parts also regulated by the number four. I have the disk of a young one presenting a somewhat similar appearance ; but in it there are five arms, two of them originating together, so that the quaternary arrangement of the other parts may be looked upon as the result of the union of two sets of organs. When very young, this species has much the aspect of an Ophiocoma ; the lateral spines are longer in proportion to the rays, and the latter are not so deeply inserted in the disk. On comparing a series of specimens from a very small size to the full grown state, we see that the chief increase has been on the outer edge of the disk (the centre being perfect in the arrangement of its scales in the young- est specimen), and at the sides of the superior arm-plates, which are at first almost ovate. The common Sand-star is found on most parts of the British coast, and does not confine itself so much to sandy ground as the next species. In England, Dr. Coldstream found it in Devonshire, Mr. Couch in Cornwall, Pennant in Anglesea; and Mr. Bean says it is dredged in deep water at Scarborough, but is very rare. Dr. Johnston takes it at Berwick, and it is abundant near the mouth of the Frith of Forth ; but is superseded by the next species, higher up that estuary. On the Dogger Bank, and gene- 26 OPHIUR^J. rally off the east coast of Scotland, it is frequent. It is found among the Hebrides, in the estuary of the Clyde, and Mr. P. Maclagan sends me it from Ayrshire. In the Irish Sea it is rather scarce ; hut is common, according to Mr. Thompson, on a sandy bottom in the north-east and south of Ireland. In Stewart’s Elements of Natural History it is stated that this Sand-star “ is supposed to be the cause of the in- juries sometimes received from eating muscles, which at certain times of the year feed upon it.” There are no grounds for this absurd notion, nor have I ever met with any persons who entertained it. LESSER SAND-STAR. 27 OP HI URIDJE. OPHIURJE. LESSER SAND-STAR. OpMura albida. Forbes. Specific Character. — Pectinated scales, clasping the bases of the rays with fewer than sixteen teeth. Inferior intermediate plates with straight sides. La- teral ray-plates with four or five spines on each. OpMura albida , Forbes, Wem, Trans, vol. VIII. p. 125, pi. iv. f. 586. OpMura texturata , 2 eadem minor albida , Lamarck, Anim. sans Vert. 1 Edit. vol. II. p. 542 ; 2 Edit. vol. III. p. 221. The Lesser Sand-star is more common than the last ; but had long been confounded with it, or passed over as its young, until I separated it from that species under the name of OpMura albida , giving it that name (though it is not altogether appropriate, seeing that the creature is white only when dried), under the belief that 28 0PHIURJ3. it was the variety, 2 albida , of Lamarck. It had long before, however, been placed aside as distinct by my friend, Mr. W. Thompson of Belfast ; and I have seen it so separated in several collections, under the belief that the larger species was the lacertosa and this the texturata. The disk is round, imbricated above with smooth unequal scales, a large one in the centre, surrounded by five others of equal size. The scales are always larger and fewer than in the last species ; and this serves also to distinguish the young of the two Sand-stars from each other, though, besides this distinction, the young albida is much thicker and smaller in proportion to its arms, than the young texturata . Op- posite the base of each ray are two triangular plates, simi- larly placed to those in the last species. The pectinated scales clasping the rays never bear more than sixteen teeth. The plates separating the origins of the rays beneath are shaped like a shield, with straight sides. The rays are covered superiorly by transversely ovate hexagonal scales, and below by smaller plates of a similar form. The lateral ray-plates bear each four or five short appressed spines. The rays are three or four times as long as the disk is broad. The largest disk I have met with measures half an inch across. When alive the disk is generally pink, with ten white spots, which occupy half of each of the ten plates opposite the ray-origins. The centre of the arms is pink ; the under surface and spines white ; the cirrhi and tentacula are tipped with yellow : sometimes the disk is marbled with orange spots. When one of these creatures is put into a vessel of salt water, it will remain quiet for some time, contrary to the habit of the Brittle-stars, and then slowly move its arms up and down. Should it be placed on its hack, that posi- tion appears to be very disagreeable to it ; for it imme- LESSER SAND-STAR. 29 diately proceeds to change it by raising its body to a per- pendicular and tumbling over. This it effects by bending two or three of the rays into an arch, leaving the others straight and spread out. It frequents oyster-beds and sandy places probably on all our coasts. Mr. Bean says it inhabits deep water at Scarborough. I find it on most parts of the Scottish coast, and abundant in the Irish Sea. Mr. Thompson says it is common on a sandy bottom on the coast of Down and Antrim, and adds the following note : — “ At Portaferry on one occasion, and in the month of October, we dredged up a considerable number of the albida and not one of the texturata. The Ophiura albida is very valuable in colour, presenting many shades of grey, brown, and red. The only white any of them exhibited on the upper surface, was a narrow stripe on each side of the base of the rays, and this was present in every one of them.11 It is common also in Dublin Bay, and on the west coast of Ireland. 30 OPHIUR/E. OPHIURIDJE. OPIIIURJE. Genus, Ophiocoma. Agassiz. Generic Character. — Rays simple, squamose, not prolonged into the disk superiorly, and separated at their origins beneath by small pentangular plates. (Cirrhi pinnate.) GRAY BRITTLE-STAR. Opliiocoma neglecta. Johnston. Specific Character. — Disk round, flat, imbricated with small smooth scales. Two oblong, parallel, touching plates opposite the origin of each ray. Upper ray- scales square ; lateral ray-plates, bearing four or five spines each, which are equal in length to the breadth of the ray. Ophiura neglecta , Johnston, Mag. Nat. Hist. VIII. p. 467, fig. 42. La- marck, Anim. sans Vert. 2 Edit. p. 226. Ophiocoma neglecta , Forbes, Wern. Mem. vol. VIII. p. 126, pi. iv. fig. 7. Ophiura elegans , Leach, Zool. Misc. II. p. 57. The Brittle-stars are at once recognised as distinct from the true Ophiurse, either alive or dried, by their GRAY BRITTLE-STAR. 31 peculiar habit, as well as by minute but more easily- definable characters. The rays of the Sand-stars have a whip-like or lizard-tail appearance ; those of the Brittle- stars look like so many Centipedes or Annelides, attached at regular distances round a little Sea-urchin. The latter are much more flexible than the former, more irritable, more brittle, nevertheless much more tenacious of life. When dried, the ray-spines of the Brittle-stars stand out from the ray ; whereas in the preserved Sand-star they are appressed to its sides. The cirrhi, too, which are seen between each row of spines in the living animal, are pin- nate, or as if covered with short tubes in the Ophiocomse. The Brittle-stars are much more active animals than the Ophiurse; they seldom remain quiet for a moment, but are continually twisting about their arms, and if laid hold of they break up into little pieces with wonderful facility, each fragment of an arm also breaking itself up into smaller pieces ; and, frequently when we seize one of these creatures, in a moment we find nothing but the disk re- maining. They can reproduce their arms in the same manner as the Asteriada. This habit of breaking themselves into pieces when cap- tured, renders it very difficult to preserve them for col- lections. Dr. Johnston has given the following directions for their preservation in the ninth volume of the Magazine of Natural History 1 “ The Ophiurse must be brought from the shore in sea- water, where, after being allowed to remain at rest for an hour or so, they will crawl about and expand themselves on the bottom and sides of the vessel. When in this state remove them with the fingers cautiously, and plunge them instantly into a large basin of cold fresh water. They die in a state of the most rigid expansion, and so quickly that even the most brittle species have no 32 OPHIUR^. time to make the contraction necessary to break off their rays. Allow them to lie in fresh water for twenty-four hours, when they are to be displayed on white paper, and dried very slowly before the fire.” I would recommend another mode which saves time, and is more convenient to the traveller. It is this : drop the Sand or Brittle star as soon as possible into fresh water, let it lie there for an hour or so, and then dip it for a moment in boiling water ; it is then to be dried in the sun or in a current of air, which will be effected in a very short time, and packed in paper. By such a simple process as many specimens as the collector pleases may he dried and put away in a couple of hours. The fresh water acts as a poison on the Ophiurse, as well as on most other marine animals, and kills them instantaneously. Mr. F. H. N. Glossop notices its effects on the Starfishes generally, in the ninth volume of the Magazine of Natural History. The Gray Brittle-star is a little species, having very much the aspect of a Sand-star, and constitutes with some allied forms a connecting link between the two genera. They cannot, however, be confounded, as the origins of the rays, whether extended into the disk above, or inserted entirely beneath, at once show whether the creature before us is an Ophiura or an Ophiocoma, independent of the other characters. Its body which rarely exceeds two- tenths of an inch in breadth, and is seldom so large, is circular and flat, imbricated above with small smooth scales which are rosulated in the centre. Opposite the origin of each ray are two oblong narrow plates, the inner margins of which touch throughout their lengths. The scales between the inferior origins of the rays are small and pentangular. The rays, which are generally a little more than three times as long as the breadth of the GRAY BRITTLE-STAR. 33 disk, are covered above by almost square scales, beneath by longitudinally oblong plates. Each of the transverse ridges on the sides of the rays bears four or five conical short spines, equal in length to the breadth of the ray. These spines appear smooth to the naked eye ; but when highly magnified are seen to be rough with little points. The colour of the body and rays is gray ; the spines lighter. The plates opposite the origins of the rays are deep gray with white tips. This species was first distinguished and named by Dr. Johnston of Berwick in the year 1835. It seems to be the Starfish mentioned in Mr. Templeton’s catalogue of the Rayed Animals of Ireland, under the name of “ Ophiura minuta found in the pools of marine rocks of Antrim and Down.” Dr. Leach characterises a species from “ among rocks on the coast of Devonshire” under the name of Ophiura elegans , which possibly is the neglecta. He describes his Starfish thus : — ■“ Body squamous, very slightly emarginate between the rays, with ten geminated scales larger than the others ; rays long, with somewhat transverse scales and short spines, gray annulated with white.” The distribution of the Gray Brittle-star on the coasts of Britain is exten- sive. In England Mr. Couch finds it on the shores of Cornwall, and Dr. Johnston at Berwick, “ between tide- marks ; not rare.” Mr. Bean takes it in a similar situa- tion at Scarborough. In the Irish Sea I have dredged it in deep water on the Manx coast. In Ireland it was taken by Mr. Thompson and Mr. Hyndman in Strangford Loch in the year 1834, and set aside as distinct. In that locality it is abundant in rock-pools among Corallina officinalis. They have also dredged up a few on the coasts of Down and Antrim, and it is common on the west coast. In Scotland, Mr. Henry Goodsir found it at Newhaven in the 34 OPHIUR^E. Frith of Forth. On the west coast I found it under stones on the shore at Campbeltown, Argyleshire, plentiful ; and Mr. John Goodsir and I took it both in Orkney and Shetland by the dredge. In the Channel Islands I found it in August 1839 at low water in Herm. I doubt not this species will be found on the coasts of France, and in the north of Europe. Starfishes do not seem to be so local in their distribution as Mollusca and the higher classes of animals. Indeed, the remark may be extended to the radiate animals generally ; for among them we find more forms, in proportion to their numbers, common to great tracts of ocean, without reference to climate, than in any other division of the animal kingdom. ball’s brittle-star. 35 OPIIIURJE. BALL’S BRITTLE-STAR. Ophiocoma Ballii. Thompson. Ophiocoma Ballii , Thompson, Annals of Natural History, vol. V. (April, 1840), p. 99. Specific Character. — Disk round or angular, covered with imbricated scales, two diverging broadly wedge-shaped scales at the base of each ray. Upper ray- scales fan-shaped ; lateral ray-plates, each bearing four spines, which are as long or sometimes longer than the breadth of the ray. This pretty little species, one of the many contributions to the fauna of our islands, for which we owe thanks to the indefatigable researches of Mr. Ball, was dredged by that gentleman several years ago in Dalkey Sound on the coast of Dublin ; and was described and named after its disco- verer by Mr. Thompson in the fifth volume of that valuable periodical, the Annals of Natural History. Several spe- cimens of the Ophiocoma Ballii were taken ; the disk of the largest was two and a half lines broad, and the rays were nearly four times as long as its breadth. The disk is rather flat, round ; in some specimens pentangular. The whole of the upper surface is imbricated with smooth scales, 36 OPHIUR^E. which are rosulated in the centre. On the disk of the largest example were a few minute scattered spines. Opposite the origin of each ray are two diverging wedge- shaped scales. The plates which separate the origins of the rays beneath are transversely ovate, and rather larger than in the neighbouring species of Ophiocoma. The rays are covered above with fan-shaped scales, beneath with rudely heart-shaped plates ; and their sides are clothed with transverse plates, each bearing four spines, which are rough and as long as, in some cases longer than, the breadth of the rays. These spines are rough, with deep puncta- tions ; and when viewed under a lens, all the scales of the body and rays are punctate in a similar manner. The colour of this species is pink. Although it has hitherto only occurred on the Irish coast, it should be sought for elsewhere, as from its resemblance to Ophiocoma neglecta it may be passed over as that species. Independent of the other characters, the diverging scales at the bases of the rays easily distinguish it. DOTTED BRITTLE-STAR. OPHIU. RID IE. 37 OPHIUPM . THE DOTTED BRITTLE-STAR. Ophiocoma punctata. Forbes. Specific Character. — Disk pentangular, covered with smooth imbricated scales ; two diverging narrow wedge-shaped scales opposite the origins of each ray. Upper ray-scales oblong, each with a central ridge and a deep depression anteriorly. Lateral ray-plates, each hearing five spines, which do not equal in length the breadth of the ray. The stomachs of fishes are often zoological treasuries. The Haddock is a great conchologist. In his travels through the country of the Mermaids, he picks up many curiosities in the shell way. Not a few rare species have been discovered by him ; and the ungrateful zoologist too frequently describes novelties without an allusion to the original discoverer. As Haddocks are not in the habit of writing pamphlets or papers, the fraud remains undis- covered, greatly to the detriment of science ; for, had the describer stated to whom he was indebted for his speci- men, we could form some idea of its habitat and history, 38 OPHIUR^. whether littoral or deep sea, — very important points in the economy of Mollusca, — important not only to the mala- cologist, but also to the geologist. Like the Haddock, the Cod also is a great naturalist ; and he, too, carries his devotion to our dear science so far as occasionally to die for its sake with a new species in his stomach, probably with a view to its being described and figured by some competent authority. The Cod is not so much devoted to the Mollusca as to the Echinodermata ; and doubtless his knowledge of the Ophiurse exceeds that of any biped. He has a great taste for that tribe. It was a Cod that communicated the pretty little species I am about to describe, to my friend, Mr. Henry Coodsir, at Anstruther ; and, as far as that gentleman could learn, it would appear the industrious animal had observed and entrapped this new Ophiocoma in the North Sea near the Dogger Bank. The Dotted Ophiocoma is a very little species. Its body is only one-eighth of an inch in diameter; but its rays are very long, being seven times as long as the disk is broad. The disk is pentangular. The upper surface is imbricated with smooth scales, which are rosulated in the centre, the central scale round and large. Opposite the origin of each ray are two long wedge-shaped scales, the basal angles of which touch, but the apices diverge. Beneath, the scales which separate the origins of the rays are ovate, and rather large in proportion to the disk. The rays are long and narrow, six times as long as the disk is broad. Above they are covered with ob- long plates, which present a more or less prominent ridge in the centre, and in front a deep dimple or impression, which is strongest towards the origins of the rays. Their under surfaces are covered with longitudinally DOTTED BRITTLE-STAR. 39 oblong plates ; their sides with short, pointed spines, not equalling their breadth, arranged in lines on prominent transverse ridges. The whole surface of the ray and spines is seen to be finely frosted when highly magnified. The colour is pinkish gray. 40 OPHIUR^J. OPHIUPIDM. OPHIURJE. THREAD-RAYED BRITTLE-STAR. Ophiocoma filiformis. Muller. Specific Character. — Disk subpentangular, notched, flat, imbricated with small smooth scales. Two oblongo-lanceolate, diverging scales, opposite the origin of each ray. Rays very long. Upper ray-scales square ; lateral ray-plates, each bearing five spines, which are shorter than the breadth of the ray. Asterias filiformis , Muller, Zool. Dan. Prod. 2843 ; Zool. Dan. t. lix. pi. cxxii. f. 1-3. Ophiura filiformis, Lam. 1 Edit. II. p. 546 ; 2 Edit. III. p. 236. Blainv. Man. d’Actin. p. 244. Among other places visited on a dredging excursion, in company with Mr. Smith of Jordanhill, in his pretty yacht the Amethyst, during the month of July 1839, was THREAD-RAYED BRITTLE-STAR. 41 the beautiful bay of Rothsay. The sea bottom in this bay is a soft shining gray mud, abounding in the usual shell-fish inhabiting such a locality, as Nucula Margaritacea , Corbula nucleus , and Amphidesma Boysii , and that very beautiful Zoophyte the Tubular ia indivisa , which seems to flourish upright on this muddy ground like a flower, fixed by the tapering root-like termination of its horny case. The common open-meshed dredge is of no use on such ground, as the mud is washed out through the meshes and the animals included have escaped before it can be drawn up to the surface. A dredge constructed of a triangle of flat pieces of iron to which a canvass bag, pierced with eyelet holes in order that the water may drain off, is attached, obviates such inconveniences, and secures the wished-for prey. Besides the creatures I have just mentioned, two beautiful radiate animals inhabit Roth- say Bay ; both of them are unrecorded as members of the British Fauna. The one is a Spatangus , which I shall describe in its proper place ; the other is the singular Brittle-star described and figured by Muller under the appropriate name of Asterias filiformis. Of this most curious of Ophiurse I first found one of the thread-like arms winding amongst the mud. Arm after arm occurred, but no body : at length the skeleton of a body was found, and when I had almost begun to despair of finding any- thing like a disk, an almost perfect specimen appeared. A few days after, dredging on similar ground in the Glair Loch opposite Greenock, I wras astonished by the sight of masses of interlacing arms of the same animal, as large as a man’s fist, coming up in the dredge. They were all alive, and twisting in every direction ; yet, strange to say, there were no more than seven or eight disks secured, although several hundreds of arms were taken. The fact 42 0PHIUR^3. is, the disk is extremely soft, especially when the animal is in egg, as was the case in the instance mentioned ; and not being so well secured to its skeleton, as in the other Brittle-stars, it was almost always rubbed away or de- stroyed by the rough usage it met with in the dredge on its way to the surface. The arms, however, seem to pre- serve their integrity much more patiently than those of the neighbouring species. The two localities mentioned are the only places in Britain where this Ophiura has as yet been observed ; it is probable, however, that it will be found in similar situations in other loughs on the west coast of Scotland. In July 1840 it was taken for the first time in Ireland by Mr. Thompson, Mr. Ball, Mr. Hyndman, and myself, in the Killary and other marine Loughs of Connemara. Muller first observed individuals in Norway, “in sedimento argillaceo 1773, rarissime ; postea in fundo argillaceo maritimo Norvegise occidentalis frequentam reperi so that its habitat appears to be always muddy. The disk is somewhat pentangular, slightly lobed and notched opposite the rays. Its surface is covered with minute, smooth, rosulated scales ; and opposite the origin of each of the rays are two oblongo-lanceolate scales, which converge, but do not touch, at their upper extremities. The arms are extremely long, though variable in their length in various specimens ; in some, ten or twelve times as long as the breadth of the disk, and of nearly equal thickness to near their extremities, where they suddenly taper to the termination. They are covered above with square scales, below with lenticular plates. Muller reckon- ed no less than one hundred and thirty-four joints in each arm of one of his specimens. Their sides are clothed with spines, which are rough and conic, scarcely as long as half THREAD-RAYED BRITTLE-STAR. 43 the breadth of the rays, and arranged in rows of about five in each row. The body is dark-reddish brown ; the rays red or flesh-colour, with a reddish line down the centre of each scale. The ovaries, which are large, and of a bril- liant orange-red, sometimes are seen through the disk, and give it the colouring represented in Muller’s figure. The disk of one of my specimens measures three-tenths of an inch across ; and from ray to ray the distance is seven inches. The most remarkable peculiarity in this Starfish’s or- ganization remains to be described, and has as yet, as far as I am aware, escaped notice either in this or any other species of its tribe. All the spines on each lateral ray-plate resem- ble those of other Ophiura, except the third (counting from above). Instead of tapering to a point, as the others do, both in this and in all other described Ophiocoma, this spine is longer than the rest, and is furnished at its extremity with two transverse-curved spiny processes, giving it exactly the form of a pickaxe. Eight or nine notches are seen on the broad apex. To what end is this singular modification of structure devoted ? Why should this species present such a curious armature, and not any of its congeners ? The reason is not hidden from us. This Ophiocoma lives in soft slimy mud, and thus has to make its way through a very different medium from that inhabited by most other Brittle-stars. The position, the increased size, and the pickaxe heads of these strange spines, are just the modi- fications of structure especially adapted to further loco- motion in such a locality. They may be compared to the lateral hooks or bristles of many earth-boring Annelides, and serve for the same purposes. The contrivance is a very beautiful example of the adaptation of organization to the locality in which the creature is destined to live. 44 OPHIUR^E. How truly doth old Rondeletius speak out of the studies of the marine zoologist : “ Immensa et summe admira- bilis Dei potentia atque solertia in rebus coelestibus, iis- que in aere et terra hunt, maxime vero in mari, in quo tam variae et stupendae rerum formae conspiciuntur, ut quaerendi et contemplandi nullus unquam futurus sit finis.1’ The vignette is a view of the ruins of Peel Castle. LONG-ARMED BRITTLE-STAR. 45 OP II I U R I DIE. OPIIIURJE. THE LONG-ARMED BRITTLE-STAR. Ophiocoma brachiata. Montagu. Specific Character . — Disk round, or subpentangular, notched, imbricated above with small smooth scales ; sides rough. Two oblong diverging plates opposite the base of each ray. Rays very long. Upper ray- scales transversely oblong ; lateral ray-plates, each bearing eight or nine thick obtuse spines, which are shorter than the breadth of the ray. Asterias brachiata , Montagu, Linn. Trans. VII. p. 84. Ophiura brachiata , Fleming, Brit. An. p. 488. Blainv. Man. d’Actin. p. 243. Among the most ardent investigators of the animals of the British seas, Colonel Montagu stands conspicuous. Whilst the discoveries of other sea-searching naturalists are too often dubious and unsatisfactory, owing to the 46 OPHIURJS. imperfect descriptions they have transmitted of the sub- jects of their observations, there is no question about the identity of any animal Montagu described. It is not merely the copiousness of his descriptions which gives them their peculiar value, though their fulness is a great merit ; nor merely their perspicuity, though that is a still greater merit ; but it is their logical character, that instinc- tive perception of the essential attributes and relations of each species, which is the most important faculty a natu- ralist can possess. Too many of our older naturalists (and can we claim exemption from the fault yet?) described forms as if there could be no creatures existing with which those forms might be confounded ; they wrote of the animals they were characterizing, as if the whole book of Nature was already in print. Montagu was a forward- looking philosopher : he spoke of every creature as if one exceeding like it, yet different from it, would be washed up by the waves the next tide. Consequently his descrip- tions are permanent ; and when he had full opportunities of examining any marine animal, subsequent observers have but little to add to his words. Had Montagu been edu- cated a physiologist, and made the study of Nature his aim, and not his amusement, his would have been one of the greatest names in the whole range of British science. The singular animal before us is one of the discoveries of that great naturalist. Its general appearance is so similar to that of the last species that, having specimens of each before, I had put them aside as one, until corrected by my friend Mr. Thompson, who, luckily, persisted in the assertion that the Asterias brachiata of Montagu was not the Asterias filiformis of Muller ; and, a close examination of the specimens which he had been so for- tunate as to preserve of the brachiata , showed the minute LONG-ARMED BRITTLE-STAR. 47 correctness of Montagu’s description, and the very great differences which distinguish these two spider-legged Brit- tle-stars. It would he an injustice to the discoverer not to give his account of the species in his own words. “ Body roundish, or subpentangular, covered above with small oval scales, disposed in ten alternate broad and narrow rays ; the smaller rays rather conic, terminating between two oblong smooth plates, placed at the junction of each arm ; the arms are five in number, extremely long and slender, very gradually decreasing to their ends : each of these is composed of between three and four hun- dred articulations, which appear like so many smooth scales above and beneath. The sides are furnished with very small moveable spines, eight or nine in a row, at every joint ; the scales near the body beneath are bisul- cated longitudinally ; and the arms at that part run quite to the centre or mouth, which is a small cinquefoil, and appears to be formed of four little plates regularly placed at each angle. On the body between the arms the surface is rough with minute papillae ; colour, when alive, pur- plish brown, and sometimes bluish ash colour. “ Diameter of the body scarce half an inch ; length of the arms from seven to eight inches, making in all an extent of about sixteen inches, or four feet in circum- ference. One in my cabinet, whose body is only three- eighths of an inch diameter, has the arms seven inches in length, which is more than eighteen diameters of the body : a disproportion not before noticed in any species of Asterias. “ This extraordinary animal is taken in sand at one particular part of Salcomb Bay, where that article is col- lected for manure. The only perfect specimens obtained were such as had been dried in a heap of the sand. In 48 OPHIUR-iE. any other way it would be impossible to kill them without breaking into small pieces from the extremely fragile quality of the arms or rays.” The Irish specimens agree in every particular with those described by Montagu. In addition to his description I may mention that the body is thick and firm. The plates opposite the origins of the rays have a deep sulcation running across them near their upper extremities, where the plates of each pair nearly touch, hut diverge greatly towards the lower. The spines which border the rays are nearly of equal thickness throughout their length ; their ends are obtuse, and when highly magnified, they do not present so many rough points at their sides as the spines of most Brittle-stars, and especially those of the last species do. In each transverse row of spines those of the two extremities are a little larger than the others. The great number of spines in each row, and their shortness, are doubtless conveniences for the aiding of the animal’s move- ments through the wet sand. The curious fluting of the under surfaces of the rays is not to he seen in any other British species of this genus. The plates between the origins of the rays are somewhat triangular in form, and furrowed across. Mr. Thompson obtained two specimens by dredging on a sandy bottom off Dundrum, county Down, in August 1836. He had previously found one in a very young state during the year 1835 in Belfast Bay, and subsequently at Strangford in rock-pools among Gorallina officinalis. Of the two first-mentioned, the body of the more perfect was four lines in diameter ; the arm least broken mea- sured three and a half inches, and where broken was nearly as broad as at the base. Dr. Fleming refers Pennant’s Asterias minuta , which LONG-ARMED BRITTLE-STAR. 49 I make a synonym of my Ophiocoma minuta , to this species. Mr. Couch in his “ Cornish Fauna,” mentions this species as an inhabitant of the shores of Cornwall. Probably the “ Ophiura filiformis ” mentioned as Irish in Mr. Templeton’s catalogue of the Rayed Animals of Ireland was the Long-armed Brittle-star. The vignette represents a view of the north-west coast of the Isle of Man, and the ruins of St. GrermahTs Cathedral. E 50 ophiur^:. OPHIURIDJE . OPIIIURM. GRANULATED BRITTLE-STAR. Ophiocoma granulata. Link. Specific Character. — Disk round, flat, minutely granulated. Upper ray-scales transversely oblong ; lateral ray-plates, each bearing from four to seven slender spines, longer than the breadth of the ray. Stella scolopendroides granulata , Link. p. 50, tab. xxvi. fig. 43 ; Encyc. Metr. pi. cxxiv. f. 2, 3. Asterias nigra , Muller, Zool. Dan. III. p. 20, t. xciii. fig. 1-4. Ophiura granulata, Fleming, Brit. An. p.488. Johnston, Mag. of Nat. Hist. vol. IX. p. 595, f. 67. Blainv. Man. d’Actin. p. 243. Ophiura echinata , Lam. 1 Edit. II. p. 543 ; 2 Edit. III. p. 223. Ophiocoma granulata , Forbes, Wern. Mem. VIII. p. 127. Ophiocoma echinata , Agassiz, Prod. This Brittle-star is remarkable for haying its disk so closely covered with minute spines that no appearance of the real surface is seen, consequently it has hitherto always been described as having a body without scales ; whereas, if we rub away the granulated or spinous surface, we shall GRANULATED BRITTLE-STAR. 51 see a squamous skin beneath, exactly similar to that pre- sented in the Ophiocoma filiformis and its allies, only the scales are much smaller. Looking at the body in its ordinary state, we also see no trace of scales opposite the origins of the rays as in the other Brittle-stars, which, if it were really the case, would reduce the presence of those scales from generic, or rather family rank, as sources of character to specific importance ; hut if we examine the denuded disk very attentively, we shall find there are two such scales of a triangular form placed in the usual posi- tion, though at a greater distance from each other than is usual in the genus. There are some foreign species nearly allied to the one before us, which form a gradation between it and our other Brittle-stars ; since in them we see the granulated surface as in ours, but denuded for a little space above the plates or scales opposite the origins of the rays, so as to allow them to peep out, as it were, from their hiding-places. The granules composing the second surface of the disk, are extremely stunted little spines, themselves rough with sharp points. The rays are smooth, covered above with transversely ovate scales, and beneath with nearly square plates. Their margins are clothed with spines arranged in trans- verse rows of from one to three, being most numerous towards the origins of the rays. There are also two little obsolete or undeveloped spines at the edge of each of the under ray-plates. The rays taper gradually, and vary in their proportions as compared with the disk, but are ge- nerally from three to three and a half times as long as the disk is broad. The ray-spines are long, slender, and sharp, and when magnified appear very rough. Beneath, the origins of the rays are separated by ovate-triangular transverse plates. The disk of this species generally measures half or three- 52 OPHiums. fourths of an inch across. It sometimes grows much larger. Mr. Ball has a specimen six inches in diameter ; the disk half an inch broad : and I have one before me at present which measures eight inches across the rays. Like its allies it is extremely frangible when alive, and has the power of reproducing its rays when they are broken off. On its frangibility Mr. W. Thompson com- municates the following note : — “ The power of this ani- mal to break itself up is exemplified in an interesting manner by a specimen in Mr. Ball’s collection. He placed it on a sheet of paper, and glued down each part as it broke it off, thus exhibiting the appearance presented by the fossil species.” Muller’s name well applies to the usual colour of this Brittle-star : the disk and rays are commonly black, or brownish black ; the ray-spines dusky white or bluish. Sometimes the disk is prettily variegated, and there is a variety of an orange colour not uncommon in the Irish Sea. Mr. Goodsir and I found some specimens in Shet- land, of a most beautiful delicate rose colour. It appears to be very generally distributed on our shores, though local. Mr. Couch finds it in Cornwall ; Dr. J ohnston, at Berwick ; Mr. Thompson, in Strangford Lough, and the open sea on the coast of Down ; and Mr. Ball, common about Dublin. I believe Dr. Fleming was the first to note it as a British species, having found it in Kirkwall Bay, Orkney, unless the Asterias spluzrulata of Pennant be this Brittle-star, which I think is not improbable. It inhabits both the open sea and saltwater lochs in from seven to thirty fathoms water. I have never heard of its occurrence in a littoral locality. It is found throughout the seas of Northern Europe. Templeton at home, and Della Chiagi abroad, have mistaken varieties of Ophiocoma rosula for it. DAISY BRITTLE-STAR. 53 OPHIURIDM. OPHIURJE. DAISY BRITTLE-STAR. OpMocoma bellis. Link. Specific character. — Disk subpentangular, convex, covered with small rosulated scales, divided by spinous spaces. A cordiform depression opposite the origin of each ray. Upper ray-scales ovate, separated and bordered by granular plates. Lateral ray-plates, bearing from four to six conical flattened spines, which are shorter than the breadth of the ray. Bellis scolopendroides , Link, t. xl. f. 71. Asterias aculeata, Muller, Zool. Dan. Prod. 2841 ; Zool. Dan. III. p. 29, t. 99. Ophiura bellis , Ophiura Flemingii , OpMocoma bellis , Fleming, Brit. Anim. p. 488. Johnston, Mag. Nat. Hist. VIII. p. 595, f. 66. Leach, Zool. Misc. II. p. 56. Forbes, Wern. Mem. VIII. p. 126. This species is one of the prettiest of its tribe. The disk is large and subpentangular, and generally bulges out 54 OPHIUR^E. between the insertions of the rays. The upper surface is ornamented with oval, round, or angular plates, variously arranged, and surrounded hy numerous, very short, blunt, little spines, which in some places cover considerable por- tions of the disk. The general arrangement of the plates on the disk is as follows : — A round central plate, surrounded at a little distance by a circle of five semicircular plates, each of which is placed at the apex of a cordiform depres- sion, the base of which is at the origin of a ray. Several large and small plates stud this cordiform depression, some- times irregularly, sometimes in a regular row. The little spines mingled wfith these plates are smaller than those on other parts of the surface, and sometimes the depres- sions are bordered by larger spines. The intermediate spaces have a row of plates proceeding from the centre to the margin. This intermingled surface of spines and plates gives the disk that likeness to a daisy-flower, whence it has been called “ bellis*>’ by some ; nor is the flower at all degraded by the comparison, for but few daisies can show such beauty either of form or colour as is presented by this little Sea- star. Beneath there are no plates on the much- rounded angles between the rays, the whole being thickly studded by the little spines. Between the origins of each pair of rays there is a little broad angular plate. The rays themselves vary much in length, and are generally very thick and rather flat. They are covered above by trans- versely ovate plates, each of which is surrounded by a border of little, flat, roundish granules, seeming like a brooch set in a frame of gems. Sometimes these plates are divided into two or three pieces ; and when such is the case, the pieces are similarly framed by granules. The rays are bordered by rows of thick, compressed, obtuse spines, generally six in each row, the largest uppermost, DAISY BRITTLE-STAR. 55 and they scarcely so long as the ray’s breadth. The under surfaces of the rays are studded with transverse, oblong, quadrangular plates, which are set at a little dis- tance from each other. The rays taper rather suddenly to their extremities. The disk is generally of a reddish colour, the plates being lighter, giving it a beautifully variegated appearance. There is a variety having a yellow star on the body. The rays are generally reddish, banded with darker bands, or with yellow. Some varieties are entirely of a deep chocolate hue. The proportions of the disk and rays vary much ; hut generally the rays are not more than three times as long as the disk is broad, yet I have seen specimens in which they were twice that length. In Shetland specimens occur having their bodies one inch across ; generally, however, three quarters of an inch is the measurement of the disk. The Shetland specimens are larger in all parts than those of the Irish Sea or Eng- lish coast, and are much more vividly coloured ; and varieties occur in the latter locality, having a very small disk. This Ophiocoma was first figured by Link, who re- ceived his specimen from Greenland. It was afterwards observed in the Norwegian seas by Muller, who figured it in the Zoologia Danica. In Britain it was first noticed, on the Scottish shores, by Dr. Fleming; and Dr. Leach, apparently unaware of its having been described before, named it after that distinguished Scottish naturalist. It is by no means an uncommon species. On the English coast Mr. Couch takes it in Cornwall, and Mr. Bean finds it at Scarborough “ under stones at very low tides, rare.” In Scotland it is found on both east and west coasts, and is very abundant in a few fathoms water in Orkney and Shetland. In the Irish Sea it is common in deep water, oif 56 OPHIURiE. the shores of the Isle of Man. On the Irish shores Mr. Thompson and Mr. Hyndman take it by dredging in the lochs of Strangford and Belfast, and Mr. Ball in Dublin Bay. In texture this Ophiocoma is much more leathery than its allies. It is a good subject in which to examine the nervous system. Surrounding’ the mouth, but at some distance from it, is a white nervous cord, which seems double ; radiating from it are fifteen pairs of nervous threads, which are arranged in threes, but have not a common origin, — indeed, there appear to be no ganglionic enlargements. Of each set of three pairs the central goes to the body between the rays, and the two lateral run up the sides of two different rays, so that each ray is pro- vided with two pairs from two different sets. This ar- rangement is very distinct and easily seen, by removing the upper surface of the disk and the enclosed stomach and ovaries. GOODSIR S BRITTLE-STAR. 57 OPHIU RIDJE. OPIIIURJE. GOODSIITS BRITTLE-STAR. Ophiocoma Goodsiri. Forbes. Specific Character. — Disk round, convex, imbricated with small smooth scales. Two triangular, parallel, but not touching scales, opposite the origin of each ray. Upper ray-scales transversely ovate ; lateral ray-plates, bearing four spines each, which scarcely equal the breadth of the ray. The tracing of the connections between species and species, through minute differences combined with general resemblances, is one of the greatest pleasures which enliven the studies of the naturalist. Every here and there in organized nature we find creatures presenting the forms of one species and the structure of another, filling up a supposed blank, or overturning a supposed barrier. The discovery of such forms frequently annihilates genera which we had long considered fixed, or brings together species which we had long* looked upon as but doubtfully 58 OPHIURJE. related to each other. There are men who affect to look down on the investigator of “ mere species,” who, with patronizing self-sufficiency, talk of the “ humble observers of minute differences of forms,” and who scarcely rank the recorder of new animals or plants above the mere col- lector or virtuoso. Yet such persons affect perfectly to understand the great laws of nature ; and will write on what they are pleased to term the philosophy of natural history, often without the knowledge of a single form or structure save from a picture in a book. The hu- mility which the knowledge of the abundance of undis- covered things teaches the practical naturalist, prevents him retorting on such would-be philosophers ; and know- ing how little we yet know, he scarcely ventures to pro- nounce any law general. He knows too well that the conclusion he drew in the morning is often overturned by the discovery he makes in the evening, to pronounce himself the lawgiver of nature ; yet also knowing, from the perfection of all he sees around him, that the ma- chinery of nature is perfect, and hoping the laws of that machinery discoverable, he points out the indications of those laws wherever he perceives a glimpse of their in- fluence, and works as trustfully towards the develope- ment of the truth. The pretty Ophiocoma which I have named after my friend and companion in research, Mr. Goodsir, forms a beautiful link between the scaly and the plated Brittle- stars. Before I saw this species, I had some doubts as to the propriety of retaining those two variations of character in the one genus, and suspected that Ophiocoma rosula was the type of a separate group. In the species under consideration, however, we find scaly rays and an imbri- cated body, with so much of the habit of the Daisy Brittle- goodsir’s brittle-star. 59 star, that it is not until we look closely at its very distinct characters, we can recognise it as something different from the young of that species. The disk of the OpJiiocoma Goodsiri is round, smooth, and very convex, covered with small imbricated scales, which are rosulated in the centre, the central scale being as usual in such cases largest. Opposite the origins of each of the rays are two triangular plates, which do not diverge, hut are separated from each other by a few scales. There are on one of the specimens a few minute spines towards the margin of the disk near these plates. Beneath, the intermediate plates are tri- angular. The rays are covered above with transversely oblong plates, which are slightly imbricated. Each of the lateral ray-plates hears four conical spines, which are rather shorter than the breadth of the ray. These spines are not so rough as they usually are in this genus. The plates of the under surface of the rays are somewhat heart-shaped. The rays are about three times as long as the body. The colour of the whole animal is white, variegated with bright-red, the disk being beautifully variegated, and the arms prettily belted. The disk mea- sures a little more than two-tenths of an inch across. The first specimen of this species was found by Mr. Goodsir in a Cod’s stomach taken off Anstruther in Fife- shire. When we were in Shetland, we found a second adhering to a branch of Cellepora cervicornis, brought from deep water by the Ling fishermen, so that we may regard it as a deep-sea species. 60 OPHIURyE. OPHIURIDJE. OPHIURJE. COMMON BRITTLE-STAR. Ophiocoma rosula. Link. Specific Character. — Disk convex, rounded, covered with spines of various lengths. Two large triangular parallel plates opposite the origin of each ray. Upper ray-scales triangular, carinated, imbricated. Lateral ray-plates, bearing five spines each, which are much longer than the breadth of the ray. Rosula scolopendroides , Link, pi. xxxvii. fig. 65 ; pi. xxvi. fig. xlii. Encyc. Metr. pi. cxxiii. f. 6-7. Borlase, Cornwall, t. xxv. fig. 1 9-24. Asterias ciliata , Muller, Zool. Dan. Prod. No. 4842. Asterias fragilis , Abilgaard, in Muller’s Zool. Dan. III. p. 28, t. xcviii. Asterias pentaphylla, varia, aculeate, hastate, fissa, et nigra , Pennant, Brit. Zool. IV. pp. 64, 65, Nos. 64-69. Ophiura ciliaris, fragilis , et rosularia , Lamarck, Anim. sans Vert. 1 Edit. II. p. 545-6 ; 2 Edit. III. p. 224-6. Leach, Zool. Misc. II. p. 54. Ophiura vulgaris , COMMON BRITTLE-STAR. 61 OpMura rosula , Fleming, Brit. Anim. p. 489. Johnston, Mag. Nat. Hist. IX. p. 281, f. 26. OpMura spinulosa, Risso, Hist. Nat. d’Eur. Merid. p. 272, No. 12, pi. vi. f. 30. OpMura fragilis , Blainville, Man. d’Actin. p. 244. OpMocoma rosula , Forbes, Wem. Mem. VIII. p. 127. Stella echinata , Rondelet, Liber de Insect, p. 123. Of all our native Brittle-stars this is the most common and the most variable. It is also one of the handsomest, presenting every variety of variegation, and the most splendid displays of vivid hues arranged in beautiful pat- terns. Not often do we find two specimens coloured alike. It varies also in the length of the ray-spines, the spinous- ness of the disk, and the relative proportions of rays and disk ; and in some places it grows to a much greater size than in others. It is the most brittle of all Brittle-stars, separating itself into pieces with wonderful quickness and ease. Touch it, and it flings away an arm ; hold it, and in a moment not an arm remains attached to the body. The body is round and convex, but when in egg some- times bulges into a pentangular form. It is usually thickly covered with long spines, the only parts of the surface free from them being the large triangular plates opposite the origins of the rays, which are separated from each other by rows of spines, the spaces between the two, which com- pose each pair, being very narrow. There is a variety, however, which has the disk very rough, but not covered with long spines. Beneath, the rays are separated at their origins by small, oblong, pentangular plates. The rays are covered above with small, triangular, carinate, obtusely pointed scales, which lap over one another, like tiles on the roof of a house. Beneath, they are clothed with trans- versely oblong plates. The lateral ridges are broad, and each bears five very long, tapering, rough spines, which are sometimes nearly three times as long as the breadth 62 OPHIUR.E. of the ray, but in general are not quite so long, being about twice the breadth. These spines, when highly mag- nified, present a very complicated structure ; and their roughness arises from spine-like processes on their surface. When the animal is alive, a membrane appears to web these processes together ; but I have never been able to observe anything like ciliary motions excited around the spines. Between each row is a pinnated cirrhus, which likewise does not appear to be ciliated. It is very flexible, and can be withdrawn in great part within the ray. Bound the mouth are twenty tentacula, ten external, and ten internal, similar in structure to the cirrhi. The rays vary in their proportions to the disk, but are usually from four to five times as long as the disk is broad. The disk generally measures in a fair-sized specimen about four- tenths of an inch across. It is sometimes of a dusky rose- colour, with gray scales ; sometimes white, spotted with red, often marked with a star of red or yellow ; and occa- sionally nearly black. The rays are generally white or gray, banded with bright pink ; often of a deep blue, with rose-coloured spines, or banded with bright yellow, or speckled with brown and orange. The spines have sometimes brown tips and blue bases. Little red spots are often seen on each of the points of junction of the rays beneath ; but as they are not constant, nor always of the same form, I cannot regard them as ocular. When the creature is in egg, the ovarian masses shine through the body, giving it a yellow tinge between the rays ; they are reniform and yellow, and transversely striated in con- sequence of the arrangement of the round yellow eggs. In the month of April, instead of eggs, I have often found those masses filled with a milky fluid which, when mag- nified, presents the spectacle of a great number of very COMMON BRITTLE-STAR. 63 minute round bodies, swimming about in all directions with eccentric motions. Are not these spermatic animal- cules? and may not Hermaphrodite animals, such as the Ophiurse, be at one time male and another female ? or are there two sexes of these creatures? These questions must be investigated. The membrane including the ova- ries is covered with vibratile cilia. The Ophiocoma rosula seems to be equally abundant on all parts of the coast of Britain and Ireland. It frequents oyster, and other shell-banks in great numbers ; and is in many places, as on the west coast of Scotland, and on some parts of the east of England, found on the shore at low water. It is fond of rocky places, but is rare in sandy localities. In Shetland it grows to a much larger size than elsewhere, and the spines of the Shetland specimens are longer than those from other localities. The Common Brittle-star often congregates in great numbers on the edges of scallop-banks, and I have seen a large dredge come up completely filled with them ; a most curious sight, for when the dredge was emptied, these little creatures, writhing’ with the strangest contortions, crept about in all directions, often flinging their arms in broken pieces around them, and their snake-like and threatening attitudes were by no means relished by the boatmen, who anxiously asked permission to shovel them overboard, super stitiously remarking that “ the things weren’t altogether right.” Rondeletius, who figured and described this species long ago, well describes their mo- tions : — “ Radiorum flexuoso motu serpentum ritu repit haec stella, et in sicco posita eos movere nunquam desinit, quousque in partes disiecerit, quae separate etiam moven- tur per flexus : ut vermiu partes, et lacertorum caudae abscissae.” He says they prey on little shells and crabs. 64 OPHIUR^E. They constitute a favourite article of diet in the Cod fish’s bill of fare, and great numbers of them are often found in the stomach of that fish. They seem to inhabit all parts of the European and Mediterranean seas. The vignette represents part of a spine of this Brittle- star highly magnified, exhibiting a structure, the lightness and beauty of which might serve as a model for the spire of a Cathedral. SAND BRITTLE-STAR. 65 OP III U RIDJE. OPHIURJE. SAND BRITTLE-STAR. Ophiocoma minuta. Forbes. Specific Character. — Disk flat, pentangular, covered with, short, rough, trifur- cated spines. Two triangular, slightly diverging scales opposite the origins of each ray. Upper ray-scales triangular, imbricated. Lateral ray-plates hearing three or four spines each, which are longer than the breadth of the ray. Ophiocoma minuta , Forbes, Wern. Trans. VIII. p. 127, pi. iv. f. 8. Hirsuta sen stella grallatoria vel macrosceles Luidii, Link, p. 50. ? Asterias minuta , Pennant, Brit. Zool. IV. p. 63, No. 61. ? This is a critical species, very nearly allied to the last. Though convinced of its distinctness, and though there is no mistake about its habit, I find it very difficult to dis- tinguish the one from the other in words. That it is not the young of the rosula will at once be seen by comparing it with a common Brittle-star of the same size ; for then the latter will be found to have the centre of the disk as yet cartilaginous, and its spines will present that peculiar glistening frosted appearance seen on the spines of all F 66 OPHIURJE. young Ophiurse, while the flatness and firmness of the disk, and the general aspect of the OpJiiocoma minuta have all the aspect of maturity. The disk, which I have never found to exceed two- tenths of an inch in breadth, is pentangular and flat, covered above with very short, rough, trifurcated spines. Opposite the base of each ray are two large triangular scales. The rays are imbricated above with short sub- carinated triangular scales, and clothed below with square plates. Their sides are set with transverse ridges, each bearing three or four long, sharp, pectinated spines, one- fourth of their length longer than the breadth of the ray. The rays are generally more than six times as long as the disk is broad. It is a very pretty species, the centre of the disk being generally occupied by a white pentangle, which is bordered by deep red, the plates opposite the rays being bluish- grey. The rays themselves are grey, belted with rose- colour ; and the spines are some white, others rose. It lives buried in sand at very low water. I have hitherto found it only on the shore of Ballaugh, Isle of Man. Mr. W. Thompson records it in the Annals of Natural History for May 1840, as an inhabitant of the north of Ireland, and mentions that it has also been found in Court Muskerry Harbour (county Cork) by Mr. Allman. I think it not unlikely that this is the “ Hirsuta seu Stella grallatoria vel Macrosceles Luidii,” said by Link to have been found by Llhewyd at Denbigh in Wales, and called by Pennant Asterias minuta. SHETLAND ARGUS. 67 OPHIURIDJE. EURYALES. Genus Astrophyton. Link. Generic Character. — Rays five, branching dichotomously from their roots, with cirrhous extremities. THE SHETLAND ARGUS. Astrophyton scutatum. Link. Specific Character. — Disk radiated above with granulated ribs ; rays rounded above, flattened beneath, with spiniferous tubercles at the angles. Astrophyton scutatum , Link, t. xxix. No. 48. Fleming, Brit. An. p. 489. f 2 68 EURYALES. Asterias caput- Medusa, Linnaeus, Syst. 1101. Muller, Zool. Dan. Prod. 2844. Turton, Brit. Fauna, 149. Asterias arborescens , Pennant, Brit. Zool. IV. p. 67, No. 73. Euryale verrucosum , Lamarck, 1 Edit.yol. II. p. 539 ; 2 Edit. vol. III. p. 216. Euryale scutatum, Blainville, Man. d’Actin. p. 246. The Euryales connect tlie Ophiurse with the Crinoidese, to which they bear considerable resemblance, both in form and in habits. The genus Astrophyton of Link, called Euryale by Lamarck, and Gorgonocephalus by Leach, is considerably removed from the last genus which we con- sidered, namely, Ophiocoma ; but there are animals in- habiting distant seas, such as those of the genus Trichaster , which link the one form with the other. The only British Astrophyton is a very rare animal. It was first observed on the coast of England by Borlase, the Cornish antiquarian and naturalist, who found it on the coasts of his native county. In Scotland it was first recorded as a native by the celebrated naturalist of Edinburgh, Professor Jameson, who found it on the coast of Zetland, where it has since been observed by Mr. Nicol and Dr. Charlton. In Orkney it was found by Mr. Low ; and it would appear also to inhabit the south-east coast of Scotland, as in a manuscript of the late Captain Laskey, he mentions having found “ a great Medusa ’s-head Star- fish in a herring-net at Dunbar.” It is a native of the Arctic seas and the coasts of Norway; it is also said to inhabit the Indian seas. The body is somewhat pentangular in form, and radiated above with warty ribs ; the mouth is five-radiate, and placed in the centre of the under surface of the disk in the midst of the origins of the arms. The arms branch dicho- tomously nearly from their origins. They are composed SHETLAND ARGUS. 69 of narrow calcareous joints, and are rounded above with precipitous sides, but flattened beneath. On the lower angles are placed transverse tubercular ridges with rows of spines, five, six, or seven in number near the body, but fewer as the arms grow smaller. The flattened surface of the arms is covered with small rounded granules, not placed in any regular order, and not all of one size. The upper surface is likewise granulated ; but the gra- nules marking the separation of the plates are arranged in two transverse regular rows. On the thicker parts of the arms there are sometimes scattered a few spines, short, thick, flattened, and somewhat conical in form, resembling the spines on the tubercles. The extremities of the rays are very much attenuated and branched, the branches curling and interlacing. The Astrophyton scutatum mea- sures a foot or more across. The singular aspect of this animal has long excited admiration among naturalists. Rondeletius especially ex- presses his wonder ; and Bradley remarks in his W orks of Nature, p. 50, 44 So odd a creature as this is well worth the contemplation of such curious persons as live near the sea, where every day they have subjects enow to employ their curiosity and improve their understanding.” Grew, in his account of the Museum of the Royal Society, tells us that 44 As he swims he spreads and stretches out all his branches to their full length ; and so soon as he per- ceives his prey within his reach he hooks them all in, and so takes it as it were in a net.” My friend, Mr. Thomas Edmonston, jun. of Unst, Zetland, informs me that 44 it is very rare, and is not found so far from land as the Piper (Cidaris papillata). The fishermen (by whom it is called 4 Argus’) occasionally catch it; but in clean- 70 EURYALES. ing their lines before landing, generally throw it and other animals overboard. They report that it always clings fast round the lines, and that it takes some effort to dis- engage it.” The vignette represents the upper and under surface of one of its arms, an arm-joint, and the oval surface of the disk. 71 THE TRUE STARFISHES. ASTERIADJE, OR CIRRHIGRADE ECHINODERMATA. The beauty and symmetry of tlie true Starfishes at- tracted the attention of such observers of nature as dwelt by the sea-side from a very early period, and several kinds are noticed by ancient authors. No separate treatise, however, was devoted to their history until the year 1733, when a splendid folio volume, containing figures of a great many species and varieties, with short descriptions attached, was published by John Henry Link, an apothecary at Leipsic. Link was a fellow of the Royal Society, and studied botany as well as zoology. He wrote an account of the coffee-tree ; and Micheli dedicated a genus of plants to him in honour of his botanical acquirements. He died 72 ASTERIADJ3. in 1734, in the sixty-sixth year of his age. His work is a very valuable one, chiefly on account of the figures it contains, which have been often copied, and which have in fact supplied most of the representations of Starfishes extant. Link distributed the Starfishes under many ge- nera, hut on false principles. His mistakes arose from want of opportunities of studying the animals in a living state. In most respects he is much in advance of sub- sequent writers on the subject. A fanciful analogy between the form of these Radiata and the popular notion of a star, has originated a name applied to them in most maritime countries, — a name which has given rise to a fine thought or two. “ As there are stars in the sky, so are there stars in the sea,” is Link’s first sentence. “ Coelorum spectare sidera decet juvatque Astronomos : Physicorum interest stellis marinis visum intendere,” saith Christian Gabriel Fischer in his preface to Link’s volume. Our own poet, James Mont- gomery, whose inspiration has revelled gloriously among the wonders of Nature, beautifully expresses the same analogy, The heavens Were thronged with constellations, and the seas Strown with their images. The true Starfishes are either stellate or angular in form, the angles or arms being dilated processes of the body. They are covered with a tough leathery integu- ment, which is more or less strengthened by a network of calcareous plates, and in most species with strong spines variously arranged. The entire surface is also clothed with a finer and softer membrane, and through pores the lining membrane of the interior pouts out. Among and on the spines in many species are seen curious pincer-like ASTERIADiE. 73 bodies, which will be described hereafter. The under surface of the body presents the mouth in the centre, and deep grooves radiate from it to the extremities of the arms. These grooves contain the suckers, curious tubular exten- sile organs, filled with a fluid, and capable of adhering to the surfaces of bodies by means of a terminal disk. They serve as feet, and by means of them the animal can walk about with great facility. They are arranged in longi- tudinal rows. On the dorsal surface is seen a wart-like striated body placed laterally between two of the rays : this is the madreporiform tubercle or nucleus. When the animal is cut open, there is seen a curved calcareous column running obliquely from the tubercle to the plates surrounding the mouth ; Dr. Sharpey says it opens by a narrow orifice into the circular vessel. It is connected by a membrane with one side of the animal, and is itself in- vested with a pretty strong skin, which is covered with vibratile cilia. Its form is that of a plate rolled in at the margins till they meet. It feels gritty as if full of sand. When we examine it with the microscope we find it to consist of minute hexagonal calcareous plates, which are united into larger plates or joints, so that when the in- vesting membrane is removed it has the appearance of a jointed column. Professor Ehrenberg remarked the former structure, Dr. Sharpey the latter : they are both right. Both structures may be seen in the column of the common Crossfish. The latter distinguished anatomist, speaking of the probable uses which have been conjectured as the purposes of this singular organ, says, “ Tiedemann con- ceives the function of the sand canal (the term he applies to it) to be that of secreting the earthy matter required for the growth of the calcareous skeleton. Mi- cheli considers this view as very improbable ; — and the 74 ASTERIADiE. description we have given does not tend to corroborate it — and adds, “ We must confess ourselves unable to offer more than mere conjecture as to the use of this singular structure. If the fluid contained in the feet and their vessels be sea-water (either pure or with an admixture of organic particles), which is probable from its chemical composition, may it not be introduced and perhaps again discharged through the pores of the disk and the calcareous tube, the porous disk serving as a sort of filter to exclude impurities I do not agree with either of these expla- nations. My friend, Dr. Coldstream of Leith, has sug- gested one much more satisfactory to my mind, and of a more philosophical character, namely, that this singular column is the analogue of the stalk of the Crinoid Star- fishes. We see the tubercle indicating it in the Urchins, which are free ; but we find no traces of it in the Cri- noideae or in the Ophiuridae, the former of which are cer- tainly fixed animals in the young state, the latter pro- bably so. The centre of the true Starfish’s interior is occupied by the stomach, which is thin and membranous, rounded, and slightly lobed, and which has but one external orifice ; from it branch out into each arm two caeca, which are of a similar texture, and very much pinnate and ramified. They, as well as the stomach and the lining membrane of the body, are covered with very minute vibratile cilia. The appearance of these caeca I regard as a first step towards the separation of the respiratory organs from the digestive. Higher up among the Echinodermata we find those caeca almost separated from the digestive system, and mainly appropriated to the purposes of respiration. Above the stomach in some species are seen pyriform sacs, the special uses of which are unknown. On each ASTERIADJE. 75 side of each arm is a branched ovary, which opens ex- ternally near the union of each pair of arms, though the aperture is seen with difficulty, saving when the animal is in full egg. On the under surface of the interior of the arms are seen rows of round bladder-like vesicles; these are the vesicles of the feet, and they are connected with vessels which communicate with a vascular circle surround- ing the mouth. The internal walls of the suckers and their vessels are ciliated, and a continual circulation of the fluid they contain goes on within them. The nervous system has been described by Tiedemann, the great anato- mist of Heidelberg. It is a white circular cord surround- ing the mouth, and sending off branches to the arms. Professor Ehrenberg says these nerves run to the ex- tremity of the arms, and that there is a nervous ganglion under each of the red spots which are seen near the tips of the rays, and which from analogy may be regarded as eyes of low organisation. The existence of ganglions in the nervous system of these animals is, however, generally regarded as doubtful. The number five is dominant among the Echinodermata , and we accordingly find it regulating the forms and organs of the Starfishes, though numerical variation more fre- quently occurs in this order than among the Ophiurse or Sea-Urchins. In no British genus of true Starfishes is number positively specific, though generic in several. In Luidia and Solaster it is of least importance. The num- bers of variation are generally four and its multiples, which we might expect when we consider that four is the domi- nant number of the parallel order of Actinodermata . The genera of Asteriadse are founded on characters derived from the outline of the body, the number of rows of suckers in the avenues, and the structure and arrange- 76 ASTERIADA3. ment of the spines covering the surface and bordering the avenues. These characters represent respectively the di- gestive, the motor, and the tegumentary systems. As might be expected, those derived from the last, it being characteristic of the order, furnish the most constant cha- racter. Useful characters may be drawn from the form and arrangements of the spinous eyelids ; but the madre- poriform tubercle, which several Continental authors have suggested as a good source of distinctive character, fur- nishes none of importance, either generic or specific. The sources of specific character are various in the different genera. The spines of the skin furnish the most impor- tant ; colour, probably, may be ranked next ; and pro- portions of parts last, though in some genera of great im- portance. The causes which seem to affect the distribution of Mollusea on the British coasts do not appear to influence that of the true Starfishes. There are as many kinds found in Cornwall as in Zetland belonging to the same genera, and even identical as species. A very few seem to prefer the western to the eastern shores of Britain, or vice versa. The multiplication of individuals is of course affected by the nature of the sea-bottom. When we look abroad, climate appears to affect but slightly the forms of this tribe. The Cushion-stars, perhaps, present some in- dications of tropical influence, and of a concentration of their genus in the eastern seas ; but among other Star- fishes neither form nor colour are remarkably modified by geographical position. Of the numbers and distribution of true Starfishes in the primajval seas we cannot well judge, their substance and structure being such as to be ill adapted for preservation in a fossil state. The British species of Asteriadse may be arranged under ASTERIADiE. 77 four families. First, The Urasterijs, Stellate Starfishes, with rounded arms, and four ranges of suckers in each avenue. Of this family we have but one genus, Uraster. Second, The Solasteri^e, also stellate (sometimes multi- radiate), with rounded arms, but only two ranges of suckers in each avenue, such as Cribella and Solaster. Third, The GfoNiASTERiiE, which are pentagonal, and have two ranges of suckers. To this family belong the genera Asterina , Palmipes, and Goniaster. And fourth, The Asterijg, including Asterias and Luidia , stellate Starfishes, with the upper surface of the body flat. W' 78 URASTERIiE. ASTERIADJE. URASTERI/E. Genus U raster. Agassiz. Generic Character. — Body stellate, few-rayed ; rays rounded, spinous ; avenues bordered by three sets of spines ; suckers quadriserial. SPINY CROSS-FISH. Uraster glacialis. Lin. Ag. Specific Character. — Rays long, pentangular, the angles with large strong spines ; avenues regularly tapering. Asterias glacialis , Linn. Lam. Anim. sans Vert. 1 Edit. II. p. 861, No. 26 ; 2 Edit. III. p. 248. Muller, Zool. Dan. Prod. 2838. Asterias echinophora , Della Chiagi, Mem. vol. II. p. 356. pi. xviii. f. 5. SPINY CROSS-FISH. 79 Asterias angulosa , Muller, Zool. Dan. II. p. 1, t. xli. ; Encyc. Metr. pi. cxix. f. 1. Sol echmatus cancellatus , Link, f. 33, tab. xxxviii.-ix, Encyc. Metr. pi. cxvii.-xviii. Stellonia glacialis, Ag. Prod. Forbes, Wern. Mem. vol. VIII. p. 123. ,, ,, Junior , Asterias spinosus , Pennant, IV. p. 62. Fleming, Brit. Anim. p. 487. Pentadadylosaster spinosus. Link, p. 35, t. iv. No. 7. Encyc. Metr. pi. 119, f. 2, 3. Stella Hibernica echinata , Petiver, Gaz. t. xvi. fig. 5. The Starfishes of the genus Uraster are distinguished from all others by having four rows of suckers in each of the avenues which groove the rays beneath. In con- sequence of the great number of these singular organs, the under surface of a living Crossfish presents a sight truly curious and wonderful. Hundreds of worm-like suckers, extending and contracting, coiling and feeling about, each apparently acting independently of the others, give the idea rather of an assemblage of polypi than of being* essential parts of one animal. Sensitive in the extreme, if we touch one of those singular tubes when outstretched, all those in its neighbourhood are thrown into a state of agitation ; and when it shrinks from our touch, changing from a lengthy fibre to a little shrunk tubercle, some of its neigh- bours, as if partaking in its fears, contract themselves in like manner. If we cut one off, however long it may have been at the moment of injury, all its power of extension is instantly gone, and in an inconceivably short time it changes its form, contracting into a little knob-like mass. The first species of this genus which we have to describe is one easily distinguished by its very angular arms and large strong spines. The Spiny Crossfish grows to a large size. Mr. Couch describes a specimen, the diameter of which across the disk and rays was no less than thirty- three inches, the largest of the rays being fourteen inches 80 URASTERIJ3. long ; the diameter of the disk in one direction three and a half, and in another three inches : the rays at their origins were two inches wide, the breadth of the disk being to the length of the ray as two and a half to twelve. The specimen from which my figure was taken is of more ordinary dimensions, being fifteen inches across, the longest ray seven inches and a half long and one inch in breadth, which was also the breadth of the disk. This species varies greatly in its proportions ; but the rays are always more taper in proportion to the disk than those of any other British Uraster. The rays are acutely pentangular and tapering, the uppermost angle forming a keel. The angles are crowned by strong conic spines placed on tuber- cles, and surrounded towards the base by a circle of nu- merous spinules. The intermediate spaces are strongly reticulated. Here and there among the reticulations are scattered a few large spines similar to those on the angles. The surface is also covered by little divided pincer-like spinules, which organs are seen on all the species of the genus. The madreporiform tubercle is small, finely striate, and placed very lateral. Beneath, the avenues taper to the ends of the rays, and the border spines are shorter, finer, and less conic than those crowning the angles. The disk is very prominent and round ; it is reticulated, and provided with spines similar to those on the rays, but not so numerous. The rays are not so firmly attached to the disk as in the other species of Uraster. “ The weight of the body,” says Mr. Couch, “ cannot be sustained, or even turned over, by lifting it by the rays without separating them.” I have dredged up living rays without bodies, evidently in consequence of this facility of separation. It is doubtful, however, whether the animal has the power of throwing them off voluntarily, as is the case with Luidia SPINY CROSSFISH. 81 and the Ophiurse. I do not think it can. The colour is reddish or orange. A specimen taken on the Manx coast was bright red. Mr. Couch describes his example as 44 reddish brown ; tufts round the spines yellow ; interior of the stomach pale-green.’’ The Spiny Crossfish is a local species, as far as I know confined to the western shores of Britain. I have taken it in Skye and elsewhere among the Hebrides, half buried in sand and gravel, at low water ; also in the Kyles of Bute by the dredge in fifteen fathoms. Mr. B. Ball has taken it in deep water at Youghal on the Irish coast, where he found many specimens of Natica Alderi, a fa- vourite article of food with the Starfishes, in its stomach. Dr. J. L. Drummond has found it in a young state at Belfast ; and Mr. Allman has frequently procured it on the south-west coast of Cork, where it is abundant, chiefly on a rocky bottom. Mr. Philip Maclagan found it on the coast of Ayrshire. Mr. Wallace has a specimen from deep water on the Manx coast ; and Mr. Couch records it as a native of Cornwall, also from deep water. The 44 Pentadactylosaster spinosus regularis ” of Link, found by Luid in Cornwall, and on the west of Ireland, was, I doubt not, the young of this species. Petiver figures the same as 44 Watty Penson’s Sea-star from Ire- land.” When young, the rays are much shorter in pro- portion to the body than they afterwards become. When very young, only an inch or two across, Ur aster glacialis bears a close resemblance to the young of the next species ; but is easily distinguished by having the spines conic, thickest at the base, whereas in Ur aster rubens they are nearly of the same thickness throughout. The Starfish usually called Aster ias glacialis by British authors, is not this but the next species. This, however, 82 URASTERI^E. is the species of Linnaeus, as may be seen by consulting the characteristic figures of Link to which he refers. Asterias tenuispina of Lamarck is, I doubt not, a variety of this, with more rays than usual. The Asterias Saveresi of Della Chiagi is also a variety ; and that author does wrong to unite Asterias molacea of Muller with the Uraster glacialis. Its rarity is probably owing to its habitat, rocky places in deep water. The Hebridean locality is an exception ; but it is a remarkable fact, one which I have elsewhere pressed on the attention of geologists when considering the Mollusca, that whenever, as in the Hebrides, the tides fall but a few feet, these animals, usually inhabitants of deep water, may be found living' above low water mark. This holds good as well in regard to Radiata as to Mollusca ; and the mixture of species generally considered inhabitants of the depths of the sea, with truly littoral species, should a fossil bed be formed, might lead to false conclusions unless such fact be borne in mind. Thus a change in the tides of a line of coast would materially affect its fauna. COMMON CROSSFISH. 83 ASTERIADJE. URASTERIJE. COMMON CROSSFISH. Ur aster rubens. Lin. A g. Specific Character. — Rays about three and a half times as long as the disk is broad, rounded, very spiny. Avenues lanceolate. Asterias rubens , Linn. 1099, Fabr. Fauna Groen. p. 369. Muller, Zool. Dan. Prod. p. 2830. Lam. 1 Edit. II. p. 562 ; 2 Edit. III. p. 160. Blainv. Man. d’Actin. p, 239, pi. xxii. A. B. Baster, t. xii. fig. 1-4. Link, pi. vii. fig. 9 ; pi. xi. fig. 15 ; pi. xiv. fig. 23 ; pi. xv. and xvi. fig. 18 ; pi. xxx. fig. 50 ; pi. xxxiv. and xxxv. fig. 58 ; pi. xxxvi. fig. 67 ; pi. xl. fig. 70. Enc. pi. cxiii. f. 1,2; pi. cxii. f. 3, 4. Asterias glacialis , Penn. Brit. Zool. IV. p. 60, No. 54. Fleming, Brit. An. p. 487. Couch, Cornish Fauna. Hogg, Stockton-on-Tees- Asterias clathrata , Penn. Brit. Zool. IV. p. 61, No. 55. {Junior.) Stellonia rubens , Agaz. Prod. Forbes, Wern. Mem. VIII. p. 121. g 2 84 URASTERIiE. The Common Crossfish has generally five rays, occa- sionally six, and not nnfrequently as few as four. The rays are rounded, and taper gradually to a point. They are commonly about three and a half times as long as the disk is broad, and the breadth of each is somewhat less than a third of its length. Both disk and rays are reti- culated, and at the angles of the reticulations arise conical blunt spines, the bases of which are surrounded by circles of thickly-studded spinules. The spines generally form a more or less regular keel on the upper surface of each ray, and sometimes an irregular circle round the disk. In the spaces between the reticulations are numerous small, cleft, pincer-shaped, flattened, pedunculated spinules. Beneath, the avenues taper according to the shape of the rays, and are not so contracted at their origins as in the next species. The edges of each avenue are bordered, first, by thickly- set, long, thin, tapering spines, which have frequently several spinules projecting in a radiant manner from their inner side near their tips. Next to these are transverse rows of stout spines, similar to those on the rays above, but larger and stronger. There are generally three in each row, and their bases are surrounded by tufts of spinules. At some distance from these spines bordering the upper surface of the ray is a row of similar spines, not so thick or strong, placed longitudinally in pairs. At the extremity of each ray we find the eyes surrounded by a circle of move- able spines, not different from the ray-spines near them, either as to form or size. The mouth is protected by spines of a similar nature with and but little longer than those forming the immediate edging of the avenues. The suckers are cylindrical, nearly equal in thickness throughout their lengths, and furnished with globose extremities. They are very extensile, especially those near the extremities of the COMMON CROSSFISH. 85 rays. The madreporiform tubercle is placed near the mar- gin of the disk, between the origin of two of the rays. It is large, convex, and finely striate, with waved radiating striae which bifurcate towards the margin. The colour of this species is generally yellow or orange ; sometimes pur- ple or red. It occasionally measures more than a foot across, and generally from nine inches to a foot. In very young specimens the pincer-shaped spinules are frequently wanting. In that state it is the Asterias clathrata of Pennant. The Common Crossfish varies considerably, sometimes in colour, sometimes in the breadth of the rays, which, when much attenuated, approach nearly in character to those of the next species. There is a variety common in the Frith of Forth, in which the spines of the dorsal ridge are much developed and very prominent. Another variety has the upper surface of a deep purple colour, the under surface yellow, the arms much broader, and the skin more leathery in texture than usual. It is a littoral form, and for distinction may be called Ur aster rubens , B. coriacea. This species abounds on most parts of 6ur shores. It may he regarded as the most common native Uraster. In the Irish Sea it inhabits various depths of water, from thirty fathoms to a few feet. At Liverpool it occurs under stones at low water. In the Frith of Forth it is abundant in from seven to ten fathoms. It ranges from Devonshire to Zetland. Dr. Johnston takes it at Berwick-on-Tweed ; Mr. Bean, at Scarborough ; Mr. P. Maclagan on the Ayrshire coast ; and Mr. W. Thompson at Dublin and Bel- fast. The coriaceous variety occurs abundantly under stones at low water, and creeping on the sides of jetties on many parts of the Fifeshire coast. Mr. Ball finds the same form common at Youghal in Ireland, where it occurs 86 URASTERL/E. nine inches in diameter, and grows much larger. The variations in the number of the rays of the Crossfish fur- nished Link with many supposititious species. These varia- tions are sometimes congenital, but more frequently the result of injury. It has the power of reproducing rays broken off ; and I add a figure of a very remarkable speci- men, kindly communicated by Mr. Bean of Scarborough, in which no less than four of the rays have been broken off and are reproduced, giving from this small developement a most strange and unradiate appearance to the creature, converting it from a star into a comet. The oyster fisher- men fancy that it loses its rays in consequence of its oyster- hunting propensities, that it insinuates an arm into the incautious oyster’s gape, with the intent of whipping out its prey, but that sometimes the apathetic mollusc proves more than a match for its radiate enemy, and closing on him holds him fast by the proffered finger ; then the Cross- fish, preferring amputation and freedom to captivity and dying of an oyster, like some defeated warrior, finding “ The struggle vain, he flings his arms away, And safety seeks in flight.” This story has long been believed. Link gives a vignette representing the mode of attack, with the motto, “ Sic struit insidias.” Doubtless the Crossfish is a sworn enemy to oysters, a submarine Dando ; but there is reason to think he destroys his prey in a very different manner from that just narrated. Starfishes are not unfrequently found feeding on shellfish ; in such cases they enfold their prey within their arms, and seem to suck it out of its shell with their mouths pouting out the lobes of the stomach. They can project the central parts of their stomachs in the man- ner of a proboscis. Mr. Ball once found one embracing a Mactra stultorum, which was pierced with a hole, and COMMON CROSSFISH. 87 the Starfish had inserted a sucker through the hole. Mr. Ball’s impression was, that the Starfish had made the per- foration. I should rather consider it the action of some siphonostomatous Gasteropod, which, not having extracted its prey, the Uraster was devouring the remains, and perhaps sounding with its sucker the prospects of a meal. M. Eudes Deslonchamps has published some interesting observations on the feeding of this species in the Memoirs of the Linnaean Society of Calvados for 1825. He tells us that when the tide was out, and while two or three inches of water remained on the sand, he saw balls of Asterias rubens , five or six in a hall, their arms interlacing, rolling about. In the centres of the balls were Mactrae stultorum in various states of destruction, but always unable to close their valves and apparently dead. Does not the Starfish in such cases destroy its food by a poisonous secretion, and thus master the Shellfish? Uraster rubens has long been believed to secrete an acrid fluid from its skin, which burns the skin of those who handle it. This story is repeated in works of natural history to the present day ; yet I have handled hundreds without having felt any such sensation, and I never met any person who had felt it. Pliny tells us Starfishes can burn all they touch (lib. ix. c. 60) ; also Aldrovandus and Albertus, who said their nature was so hot that they cooked everything they meddled with. Link thought that their eggs had been mistaken for cooked food ; and Luid, who was an out-door naturalist, denied the notion altogether. Possibly it arose from confounding them with the stinging Medusae, which are also called Sea-stars by many, and confounded by the vulgar with Starfishes. Sir Thomas Browne notes on this notion, “ Stella Marina, or Sea-stars in great plenty about Yar- mouth. Whether they be bred out of the Urticus, Squal- 88 URASTERIiE. ders, or Sea-jellies, as many report, we cannot confirm ; but the Squalders in the middle seem to have some lines or first draughts not unlike.” — (Works, Wilkin’s Edit. vol. iv. p. 333.) Although there is no good reason to believe the skin of the Uraster secretes an acrid and poisonous fluid, the stomach possibly may, and the inquiry offers a good subject for experiment. The Starfishes of this genus prey on all kinds of Mollusca, and are very commonly found with Natica Alderi in their stomachs, the animal of which being large and fleshy must furnish them with ex- cellent nourishment. They do not confine themselves, however, to Mollusca, as will be seen by the following note furnished me by my friend Mr. W. Thompson. “ September 19, 1837. — W. D. an intelligent fellow, tells me that he has frequently, when fishing in Belfast Bay, taken Starfish on his hook ; they seized upon the lugworm (Lumbricus marinus) he was using as bait, and when drawn up, the 4 centre’ (to use his own words) of the animal was always fastened to the hook. The 4 pluck’ of the Starfish was such as to induce him to believe he had hooked a fair-sized fish. I showed him specimens of our native Asteriadse, when he identified the Uraster rubens , and it alone, as the intruder.” The Uraster rubens is popularly called 44 Crossfish,” and 44 Five-fingers,” on most parts of the English and Scottish coasts. In Cornwall it is called Clam or Cramp. The fishermen of Newhaven, near Edinburgh, tear them across the stomach in order to destroy them before returning them to the sea ; and there are local regulations in many places prohibiting the dredgers to throw them overboard alive. In Bishop Sprat’s History of the Royal Society, we are told that the Admiralty Court laid penalties on those engaged in the oyster fishery 44 who do not tread COMMON CROSSFISH. 89 under their feet, or throw upon the shore, a fish which they call Five-finger, resembling a spur-rowel, because that fish gets into the oysters when they gape and sucks them out.” Dr. J. L. Drummond of Belfast favours me with the following note on their Irish denomination. 44 The Starfishes are called at Bangor (county Down) the j Devil's fingers , and the DeviVs hands , and the children have a superstitious dread of touching them. When drying some in the little garden behind my lodgings, I heard some of them on the other side of the hedge put the following queries. 4 What’s the gentleman doing with the bad man’s hand ? Is he ganging to eat the bad man’s hands, do ye think V ” On the east and south coasts the Crossfishes are used for manure in large quantities ; and Lamarck tells us that they serve the same purpose on the coasts of France, where the species under consideration is equally abundant as in Britain. A gardener told me that he would desire no richer manure than Starfishes for his garden. Common as this species is, its history has been involved in sad confusion as regards synonyms. Of the older authors it is certainly the Asterias rubens , and Otho Fabri- cius describes it with his accustomed accuracy under that name. The Asterias rubens of Dr. Fleming appears to he strangely compounded of this and Solaster endeca. Dr. Johnston described the Luidia fragillissima under the same name ; and in the new edition of Lamarck, by some oversight, his description is referred to among the syno- nyms of the true rubens. Blainville’s references are cor- rect, as also those given by Stewart in his 44 Elements of Natural History.” Link gives many characteristic figures of it, one of which is from a British specimen, called by Luid 44 Lutea vulgaris.” Baster figures it, and tells us that 90 URASTERI^E. these stars are not only able to creep, but also to swim ; which is probable, since Mr. Couch (who calls it Asterias glacialis after Fleming) tells us in his Cornish Fauna, that it is “abundant in the early months of spring, but they retire to deeper water in summer.” The same ardent natu- ralist has also a note on the species in the twenty-seventh number of the new series of the Magazine of Natural History, where he says, “ This species is in great abun- dance in spring, being found in multitudes in the fisher- men’s crab-pots, the baits of which they readily find. As the season becomes warmer they disappear, and in summer comparatively few are seen.” In the same place he de- scribes the following remarkable monstrosity of this “ the Clam or Cramp. It is of the ordinary size, and possesses eight rays ; but to distinguish it from the simple duplica- tion of parts, it possesses three of those circular dorsal organs, the use of which is uncertain, but of which a common specimen possesses only one. These three occupy triangularly one-half of the disk, and seem connected with four of the rays, the other four lying distinct from them.” Probably the result of the union of three ova. VIOLET CROSSFISH. 91 A STEM AD JE. URASTEMJE. VIOLET CROSSFISH. Uraster molacea. Muller. Specific Character. — Rays from two and a half to three and a half times as long as the disk is broad, rounded, spiny, tapering suddenly to their apices. Avenues pyriform-lanceolate. Asterias rubcns molacea, Muller, Zool. Dan. t. lxvi. Sol coriaceus planus. Link, p. 33, t. xi. No. 15. Asterias violacea, Linn. Gmel. p. 3163, No. 24. Blainv. Man. d’Actin. p. 239. Lam. Anim. sans Vert. 2 Edit. III. p. 256. Ehrenberg, Berlin Trans, vol. XXII. p. 209, t. viii. f. 9. The Violet Crossfish is a critical species. At times it is very difficult to distinguish it from the last species ; yet after a thoughtful study of very many specimens, I feel convinced they are distinct. Muller doubted, and appa- rently could not make up his mind ; for he figures it as 92 URASTERIiE. “ Asterias rubens molacea .” In both animal and vegetable kingdoms there are genera in which we find habit of equal or greater importance than minute character, in which every organ and appendage are liable to variation, and yet the sum of them is such as to render the recognition of a species at sight easy, though it be difficult to say wherefore we pronounce on its name. Doubtless this is according to a fixed law as yet undiscovered; and if smaller groups and variations be analogous to the greater divisions of the kingdom to which they belong, it is to be expected, seeing that a fifth part of the animal kingdom, according to the greater modifications of structure as in- dicated by form, presents habit as a distinguishing cha- racteristic. The TJr aster molacea has the rays generally from two and a half to three and a half times as long as the disk is broad. They are broad at their origins, and at about half their length they taper suddenly to their extremities. They appear marginated, from having the upper row of avenue spines placed very high, much higher than in rubens. The upper surface of the rays and disk is strongly reticulated and spinous, and the central ridges are very regular, the spines upon them being closely set and sur- rounded by spinules. They do not stop short at the disk as in the last species, but meet in its centre. The spaces between the reticulations are covered with pincer-shaped spinules. These spinules are more pointed than the same organs in Uraster rubens. Beneath, the spines bordering the avenues are arranged as in the other species of the genus. The avenues partake of the form of the rays, being suddenly attenuate towards the extremities, very wide towards their origins, and very much contracted at the mouth. The form of the avenues is very constant, VIOLET CUOSSFISH. 93 and affords the best characters for the distinguishing of species in this genus. The colour of Uraster molacea varies much, and is often very beautiful, being of a bright orange, or rich red, with blue spots, and beneath not uncommonly straw colour. Frequently the rays are of a livid purple towards their extremities. The bases of the spines are often surrounded with a ring of blue. The madreporiform tubercle is very lateral, the strise coarse, undulating and radiating from the centre, often bifurcating towards the base. This species is apparently gregarious, and somewhat confined in its habitats. In the Frith of Forth it is ex- ceedingly abundant. Off Anstruther, at the mouth of the Frith, it is by far the commonest species ; and the fisher- men bring up great numbers of them on their lines, while Uraster rubens seldom occurs. Dr. Johnston informs me that it is the most common species on the coast of Ber- wickshire, while the rubens is rare. High up the estuary of the Forth the rubens is common, and molacea scarce. In some parts of the Irish Sea it is not to be met with. On the coast of Ireland, however, Mr. Thompson states it is common at Belfast, Dublin, and Youghal, and is found mixed with rubens. Mr. Goodsir and I took it in Orkney and Shetland. At Scalloway in the Shetland Isles we found a remarkable variety, which at first sight had much the aspect of a distinct species. The rays tapered from their bases and were very narrow. The central and lateral ridges of spines had the spines placed at considerable distances from each other in an extremely regular manner. The spinules round the bases of the spines, which were as usual in this species long and taper- ing, were highly developed. Very few spines were scat- tered over the reticulations of the rays ; but a good num- 94 URASTERI^E. ber over the surface of the disk. Beneath, the avenue spines of the second row were longer than usual. The avenues presented the usual character. Although so much attenuate, the rays in this variety bore the same propor- tions to the disk as in the common form of the species. The dimensions of the Violet Crossfish vary much. In some places they are seldom found measuring more than four or five inches across. In other localities they attain the magnitude of the common Crossfish. The vignette is a view of Breda Head, Isle of Man. LITTLE CROSSFISH. 95 ASTERIADM. URASTERIJE. LITTLE CROSSFISH. TJr aster hispida. Penn. Specific Character. — Rays short, rounded, spinous. Avenues ovate. Asterias hispida , Penn. Brit. Zool. IV. p. 62, t. xxx. f. 58. Stellonia hispida , Forbes, Wern. Mem. VIII. p. 123. Stella coriacca acutangula hispida , Link, p. 31, t. ix. f. 19 ; t. xxxv. f. 39. The Uraster hispida is the smallest of our native Cross- fishes. It was first distinguished by Pennant, who gives a figure sufficiently characteristic to enable us to identify the species, though very different animals have been re- ferred to his Asterias hispida. This species seldom mea- sures more than an inch and a quarter across. The rays are very broad and short, being but little longer than the breadth of the disk, in some specimens even shorter. The body is very convex, and generally of a bright rose colour. Pennant’s specimen was brown. The upper surface is reticulated ; stout spines of nearly equal thickness through- out their length, and mostly simple at their bases, crown- ing the angles of the reticulations. The ridge down the centre of the very gibbous arms is often very indistinctly 96 URASTERIJE. marked. Beneath, the spines bordering the avenues are longer and finer than those on the reticulations, and are arranged in the same manner as in other species of Uraster. The avenues are elongato-ovate in form, — a good distin- guishing character throughout this genus. The little Crossfish is a scarce species, and where found does not seem to occur in much plenty. Pennant found it in Anglesea. I have taken it at Arisaig, on the coast of Ross-shire, in crevices of the gneiss rocks at low water ; and under stones on the shore in the Kyles of Bute. It occurs also on the east coast of Scotland, as I found several speci- mens cast up by a storm on the sandy shore at St. An- drew’s, in December 1839. Dr. Coldstream found it among limestone rocks at Castletown, Isle of Man ; and Mr. W. Thompson informs me it occurs, though rarely, on the coast of Down in Ireland. The Irish specimens were only ten lines in diameter. Captain Portlock has taken it in Bel- fast Bay. I am not aware of any instance of its occurrence out of Britain ; but it probably will be found on the Scandi- navian shores. It may easily be passed over as the young of one of the more common species, but is very distinct. The Starfishes of the genus Uraster have a very wide geographical distribution. The Common Crossfish has been observed in Greenland, and other places very far north, and is found in the Mediterranean, and on the south- western shores of Europe. The Spiny Crossfish has a similar distribution. A species very nearly allied to it, having broader and shorter rays, but very similar in the arrangement of its spines, has been found by Mr. Wallace on the coast of Peru at Islay. A Starfish, very nearly allied to rubens , but differing in the fineness and greater number of its spines, is preserved in the Hunterian collec- tion from the Arctic Seas. This may possibly occur on LITTLE CROSSFISH. 97 our own shores. The Violet Crossfish is found on the Norwegian coast, and in the Baltic Sea. Anciently the Urasters were used in medicine. They were given internally as a decoction with wine in hysterical diseases, and against epilepsy. The physicians of old times, members of a profession never very remarkable for logical acumen, applied them externally in hernia, from some fanciful analogy between their pouting stomach and the appearance of the rupture. Any medical man, who would wish to revive the practice, will find the prescriptions carefully gathered together in Link, who, however, does not appear to have put much faith either in the medical or gastronomical virtues of Starfishes ; yet, conceiving it necessary to find some use for them, according to the manner of his times, tells us they are of use to man, not because they serve as food to him themselves, hut because they feed the fishes, and the fishes feed him, adding, “ Miror hinc et in providentia divina sapientiam.” In describing the species of Ur aster, I have frequently spoken of spinules, by which name I have designated those singular pincer-shaped bodies termed by Muller Pedicel- laritE , — bodies seen on the surface of many species of Star- fishes and Sea-Urchins, and in the dried specimen appear- ing like little cleft spines. Dr. Sharpey thus describes them in his account of the anatomy of Uraster rubens : — “ They cover the surface generally, and form dense groups round the spines. Each consists of a soft stem, bearing on its summit, or (when branched) at the point of each branch a sort of forceps of calcareous matter, not unlike a crab’s claw, except that the two blades are equal and similar. When the point of a fine needle is introduced between the blades, which are for the most part open in a fresh and vigorous specimen, they instantly close and 98 URASTERI.E. grasp it with considerable force. The particular use of these prehensile organs is not apparent ; their stem, it may- be remarked, is quite impervious.” I have examined them very carefully in the same species. Those on the body and upper spines differ in shape from those on the spines immediately bordering the avenues. The former are much shorter and blunter in the blades than the latter. The calcareous forceps, of which their heads consist, are im- bedded in an integument of a soft granular tissue, which envelopes the forceps when closed ; and this apparatus is mounted on a bulging body of a similar substance, which crowns the round flexible and contractile peduncle, some- times simple, sometimes branched, each branch having a similar termination. I could detect no evidence of vibra- tile cilia on their stalks ; but there appeared to he ciliary motions within the blades. When the Starfish is alive, the Pedicellaria are continually in motion, opening and shutting their blades with great activity ; but when cut off they seem to lose that power. If they he not distinct animals, as Muller fancied, for what purpose can they serve in the economy of the Starfish ? If they be parasites, to what class or order do they belong l — what is their nature, what their food \ Truly these are puzzling questions. These organs or creatures have now been known for many years — have been examined and admired by many natural- ists and anatomists — have been carefully studied and accu- rately delineated, and yet we know not what they are. This is hut one of the many mysteries of natural history — one of those unaccountable things which we know and know not — of those many facts in nature which teach us how little is man’s knowledge, and how wondrous and un- searchable is God’s wisdom. It is folly and vanity to attempt to account for all facts in nature, or to pretend to LITTLE CROSSFISH. 99 say why the Great Creator made this thing, and why he made that, and to discover in every creature a reason for its peculiar organization. It is but another form of the same vanity, having satisfied itself of the discoveries it has made, to pretend to praise the all-wise Maker’s wisdom in so organizing his creatures. That God is all-wise is a revealed truth ; and whether the organization before us seem excellent or imperfect it matters not — we Jcnow it is perfect and good, being the work of an all-wise God. The vignette represents the form of the avenues in the Common, the Violet, and the Little Crossfishes. H 2 100 SOLASTEBIiE. ASTERIADJE. SOLASTERIJE. Genus Cribella. Agassiz. Generic Character. — Body stellate ; rays rounded, covered, as well as the disk, with spiniferous tubercles ; intermediate spaces porous ; avenues bordered by two sets of spines ; suckers biserial. EYED CRIBELLA. Cribella oculata. Pennant. Specific Character. — Rays and disk irregularly covered with oblong reticulating spiniferous tubercles. Pentadactylosaster oculatus , Asterias oculata , Linkia oculata , Asterias multifora , Asterias perforata , Link, p. 31, t. xxxvi. f. 62. Pennant, Brit. Zool. IV. p. 61, t. xxx. f. 56. Fleming, Brit. An. p. 487. Forbes, Wern. Mem. vol. VIII. p. 120. Lam. Anim. sans Vert. II. p. 565 ? Muller, Zool. Dan. Prod. 2834 ? EYED CRIBELLA. 101 The genus Cribella forms a connecting link between the Urasters and the Solasters. It has the form of the former, with the suckers and texture of the latter. The name LinJcia given it by Nardo must be rejected on account of a genus of plants having been so named previously, there- fore I have adopted Professor Agassiz’s proposed appel- lation. At the same time I feel by no means convinced that a name should be changed, if long established, for the reason I have mentioned : there are great generic ap- pellations common to both animal and vegetable kingdoms universally adopted, and yet causing no confusion. It had best, however, be avoided ; a repetition of the same name generically in either of the organic kingdoms separately is quite inexcusable. Two species of this genus inhabit the British seas : there are several exotic forms. The first of our native species, the Asterias oculata of Pennant, seems strangely enough to have been confounded, both by many British writers and foreign naturalists, with Uraster rubens and Solaster endeca. Its colour must have misled in the former case, its texture in the latter. It received its name of oculata , either on account of the moniliform pores, or the five dark spots which occasionally mark the origins of the rays. The pores on the surface are not characteristic of this genus only, as Professor Agassiz seems to think. They may be seen in many other Starfishes, and in the young of almost all the species. In the living animal, a brownish peritoneal membrane pouts out at each pore. Are they not subser- vient to respiration \ The rays are five in number, rounded, and generally nearly four times as long as the disk is broad ; they vary in form according to the state of the animal. When it is in egg, they are broad and swelled out at their bases; 102 SOLASTERIiE. when not so they taper very gradually, and terminate obtusely. The spawning season makes a very great differ- ence in the forms of many Starfishes, always adding greatly to their convexity, and their skin at such times is much softer than usual. The disk and rays are covered with oblong reticulating tubercles arranged irregularly. The spines on these tubercles are very numerous, short and rough. The spaces between them are porous. The avenues are bordered by two sets of spines. That nearest each avenue (which is very narrow) consists of regularly transverse rows of from three to six rough spines. The second row is composed of oblong tubercles, bearing fasci- culi of from four to six spines. Between these two rows there is a line of pores larger than those on other parts of the rays. The spines protecting the mouth are a very little larger than those on the border. At the end of each ray is an eye, protected by an irregularly ovate ring* of spines. Mr. Goodsir has examined this eye carefully, and finds it to consist of a red cushion, with pits on its surface. The madreporiform tubercle is placed laterally, and is rudely striate with coarse undulating strise. The colour is generally dark red or deep purple above, and straw colour beneath. Small specimens are lighter. Occasionally spe- cimens are taken of a bright vermilion. As in many other Starfishes, the spines are more regularly placed on the yellow portions than on the red. What is the relation between these arrangements and the colour ? The Cribella oculata seldom measures more than three inches and a half across. This species varies much. The spiniferous tubercles are much more numerous and finer on most specimens from the east coast than on those from the west. The latter are usually found in deep water, the former at low water. EYED CR1BELLA. 103 A very remarkable variety was obtained by my friend, Mr. Henry Goodsir, from the deep sea-fishing off the coast of Fife. One specimen only occurred. The rays in this form are covered with oblong tubercles, bearing numerous short, thick, oblong spines, which are much fewer and larger than in the usual form. The tubercles are more dis- tant from each other, and the oculated spaces not so nu- merous, giving the whole animal a rough granulated ap- pearance. The spines bordering the avenues are arranged in transverse rows, three or four in each row, thick and clavate : in the common form they are six or seven, more regular and finer, the rows often being double. The suck- ers are larger and thicker than usual. The eyelids are similarly formed of three spines forming an arch, and two on each side parallel. When first taken it was of a deep- orange colour. It measures four inches and a half across, and each ray is one inch and three quarters long. Though presenting much of a specific appearance, I cannot regard it otherwise than as an extreme form of the species under consideration. The Cribella oculata varies much in its habitat. On the east coast I generally find it among rocks at low water ; on the west I take it in deep water by the dredge. These habitats are not however constant in either case. It is very common in the Irish Sea. Pennant found it on the shores of Anglesey. It was noticed as Irish by Mr. Tem- pleton. Mr. W. Thompson obtained it by dredging in the north of Ireland ; and Mr. Ball finds it at Dublin and Youghal. Mr. Couch says it is not uncommon in Corn- wall. Mr. Hogg records it as a native of Durham ; and Mr. Alder informs me it is common on the coast of North- umberland. Mr. Bean has taken the rough variety in deep water off the coast of Scarborough, where he notes 104 SOLASTERIiE. it as rare. A specimen which he kindly sent me for ex- amination, measured no less than seven inches across. He also finds the smooth variety at low water, but not com- mon. In Scotland it is abundant on the east coast. In the Shetland Isles it is very common at low water. One day, when Mr. Groodsir and I were seeking for marine animals when the tide was out in Bressay Sound, we found the rocks covered in many places with minute round red bodies, always in the neighbourhood of one of these Star- fishes. On magnifying some we doubted not that they were very young Cribella. They were quite soft, of an orange-red colour, and presented no traces as yet of tuber- cles or spines. They were distinctly five rayed, the rays truncate and notched at their extremities. The truncation and notching may be seen in very young specimens of several other species. The parents had probably come up from deeper water to spawn on the shore. It was in June, and at the same time there was much spawn of Eolida , and other Mollusca, on rocks and stones. These creatures swim with great facility, and many of them are to be seen on the coast only at spawning season ; so that it would be of great consequence to collect data as to the spawning sea- sons of all the Mollusca and Radiata, since we may he led into many mistakes about the geographical distribution of species, if we do not take into account the fact that the animals apparently absent from a coast, may be habitual visitors at certain periods. Having mentioned the youngest Starfishes which I ever met with, I think it right here to allude to the interesting observations of a distinguished Norwegian naturalist, M. Sars, clergyman of the parish of Kind, near Bergen, on the developement of the young of Asterias sanguinolenta of Muller, by which species, I suspect, may be meant the EYED CRIBELLA. 105 Cribella oculata. They were published in WiegmamTs Archives for 1837, and an account of them is given in the new edition of Lamarck. According to M. Sars, the little Starfishes immediately after birth have the body depressed and rounded, and furnished with four very short club- shaped appendages, or arms, at their anterior extremity. When they are a little more developed, one can distinguish some papillae disposed in five radiating series on the upper surface. These young Starfishes move slowly, but uni- formly in a straight line, with their four arms in advance. Their movement is probably effected by vibratile cilia. Their arms serve also to fix them to or enable them to creep slowly along the sides of rocks. At the end of twelve days, the five rays of the body, which till then were rounded, begin to grow ; and after eight days more, the two ranges of feet, or tentacula, are developed under each ray, and can assist the movements of the animal by elon- gating and contracting themselves alternately, and by performing the function of suckers. By that time the swimming movements have altogether ceased. At last, in the space of a month, the four original arms have alto- gether disappeared ; and the animal, at first symmetrical or binary, has become radiate. 106 SOLASTERIA3, ASTERIA DAE. SOLA S TER1JE. THE ROSY CRIBELLA. Cribella rosea. Muller. Specific Character. — Rays and disk with regular longitudinal rows of sub- triangular reticulating spiniferous tubercles. Asterias rosea , Muller, Zool. Dan. Prod. 2837. Zool. Dan. t. lxvii. Ireland has been long looked upon as a sort of terra incognita by British naturalists. Although it might seem to the politician a land of plagues and agitations, to the ROSY CRIBELLA. 107 zoologist and botanist it seemed a land of promise. Several times the Emerald Isle has been threatened with an in- vasion of English and Scottish philosophers, who have long been fully convinced in their own minds, that there is a great deal more in the Hibernian bogs than meets the eyes of Irishmen. The botanists actually invaded the sister country one year, determined to find out the undis- covered riches of this El Dorado of Nature, with what success we leave them to say : still, they retain their hopes. But the zoologists are yet more sanguine ; and even in the year 1840 one of our most eminent styles the land of St. Patrick “ that very interesting, but little investigated country Y et all this time Ireland abounds in naturalists, true field-philosophers, whose only bad habit is the modesty which prevents them publishing their discoveries, too often, until some less retiring students of nature proclaim new facts and new animals, which should have been recorded long before. England and Scotland conjoined can scarcely show as many zoologists engaged in original and practical observation of their marine invertebrate animals as Ireland ; and a great part of the additions during late years to that division of the British Fauna has come from the sister country. Among those, not one of the least beautiful is the pretty Starfish which I am about to describe. The Crilella rosea has five rounded tapering rays, which are each four and a half times as long as the disk is broad. The upper surface and sides of the arms and disk are covered with triangular reticulating spiniferous tubercles, which on the arms are arranged in regular longitudinal rows, and are more distant from each other than in the last species. The spines crowning these tubercles are short, rough, blunt, and very numerous. The spaces between the reticulations are porous. Beneath, the avenues are 108 SOLASTERI^E. wider than in the Cribella oculata. They are bordered by two sets of spines. The edge-row consists of transverse ridges of long tapering spines placed two and three to- gether. The spines projecting over the mouth are longer and sharper. The madreporiform tubercle is very lateral, and finely striate. It is surrounded by a border of short spines similar to those on the spiniferous tubercles. The eyelids are like those of the Eyed Cribella . Mr. Ball was the first contributor of this beautiful species to the British Fauna. He obtained it many years ago from the Nymph-bank off Waterford, and has two specimens in his collection. When recent he says it was of a bright orange colour. The specimen I have figured I owe to the kindness of my friend, Mr. Philip Maclagan, who was so fortunate as to add this species to the Fauna of Scotland during the summer of 1839. He found it on the coast of Ayrshire. It measures six inches and three- fourths in diameter. The disk is nearly an inch broad, and the rays above half an inch thick at their origins. Muller was the original discoverer of the Cribella rosea. He found it on the Norwegian coast, and figures it of a bright rose colour. The Cribella oculata would appear also to be found in the same region, and has been observed on the coast of France. The genus extends its range to the West Indies. PURPLE SUN-STAR. 109 ASTEMADJE. SO LA STEM JE, Genus Solaster. Forbes. Generic Character. — Body stellate, multi-radiate, covered with fasciculated spines ; avenues bordered by three sets of spines ; suckers biserial. PURPLE SUN-STAR. Solaster endeca . Linnaeus. Specific Character. — Rays nine to eleven, shorter than the breadth of the disk ; fasciculi of spines oblong ; spines short, thick. Asterias endeca , Linn. Lamarck, Anim. sans Vert. 1 Edit. vol. II. p. 560, No. 23 ; 2 Edit. vol. III. p. 247. Flem. Brit. An. p. 487. Sowerby, Brit. Misc. p. 49, t. xxiv. Johnston, Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. IX. p. 300, f. 44 ; Encyc. Meth. pis. 114, 115. Link, tab. 1 5, 16, No. 26 ; tab. 17, No. 27. Solaster endeca , Forbes, Wern. Mem. VIII. p. 121. Stellonia endeca , Nardo. Agassiz, Prod. Echin. Asterias aspera , Muller, Zool. Dan. Prod. 2833. 110 SOLASTERIA3. The Solasters are suns in the system of sea-stars. Their many rays and brilliant hues give them a distinguished place among the marine constellations. Two species in- habit the seas of Britain. The genus extends its range far to the south. The Solaster helianthoides , a species nearly allied to our common Solaster papposa , but having many more arms, is found on the western shores of South America. They differ from the Urasters , with which Professor Agassiz proposed to unite them, not only in form and arrangement of spines, but also in having only two ranges of suckers in each avenue, whereas the Cross- fishes have no less than four. The Purple Sun-star has from nine to eleven rays, which are rounded and shorter than the breadth of the convex disk. The disk and upper surfaces of the rays are purple ; the under surface and sides of the arms cream colour. Both arms and disk are thickly covered with oblong tubercles, which are scattered on almost all the purple parts, but arranged in irregular rows on the cream- coloured portions. Each of these tubercles is crowned by a circle of strong rough spines, which generally surround a central one, similar in appearance to the others. Beneath, the avenues are narrow. Three sets of spines border them. That immediately bordering each avenue-margin, consists of transverse comb-like rows of from five to ten spines webbed together towards the base. Next to these we have transverse ridges, narrow and compressed, each bearing a double row of shorter spines. Beyond this is a row of tufted spines similar to those upon the upper surface, but thicker. The madreporiform tubercle is sublateral, cir- cular, and finely striate with radiating striae. There is a curious aperture with a spinous border seen in the centre of the back of this and several other Starfishes, the nature PURPLE SUN-STAR. Ill of which is not rightly understood, though it appears to bear some analogy to the anus of the Echinidse. The largest Starfish of this kind which I have seen, measured eight inches and a half across. It grows larger. Mr. Ball has a specimen nine inches in diameter. In Sowerby’s British Miscellany, this species is first recorded as British 44 found by J ames Brodie, Esq. on the Nain coast in the Moray Frith.” In the Irish Sea off the Isle of Man it is not rare in deep water. Mr. Alder in- forms me that it is frequent on the coast of Northumber- land. Mr. Bean finds it at Scarborough 44 in deep water, not rare.” Mr. Goodsir takes it at Anstruther. It occurs in Orkney. In Ireland, Mr. Thompson finds it on the coasts of Down and Antrim ; and Mr. Ball at Dublin and Youghal. He finds Natica Alderi in its stomach. To the pencil of Mr. Alder I am indebted for a view of Tynemouth, a locality which has yielded many rarities to the naturalist. 112 SOLASTERIJB. COMMON SUN-STAR. Solaster papposa. Linnaeus. Specific character . — Rays twelve to fifteen, one-half as long as the breadth of the disk ; fasciculi of spines circular ; spines long, slender. , Astcrias papposa , Stella dodccactis , Astcrias helianthoides , Stellonia papposa , Solaster papposa , Linn. 1089. Muller, Zool. Dan. Prod. 2832. La- marck, Anim. sans Vert. II. p. 559 ; 2 Edit. III. p. 246. Fleming, Brit. An. p. 487. Johnston, Mag. Nat. Hist. IX. p. 475, f. 69; Encyc. Meth. pi. cvii. f. 4, 5. Link, tab. xvii. No. 28 ; tab. xxii. No. 52. Pennant, Brit. Zool. IV. p. 66, No. 72. Agassiz, Prod. Forbes, Wem. Mem. VIII. p. 121. This Starfish is one of the commonest, and, at the same time, of the handsomest of all the British species. The COMMON SUN-STAR. 113 rays are generally twelve or thirteen in number, sometimes as many as fifteen. They are about one half as long as the disk is broad. They are somewhat rounded, but the disk is flat. The upper surface is covered by tubercles, which are arranged in regular rows on the arms, but are scattered on the disk. Each of these tubercles bears a bundle of long spiculiform striated spines, eighteen or twenty in each fasciculus. On the arms there are generally five rows of these spiniferous tubercles. The intermediate spaces are reticulated. The madreporiform tubercle is sublateral, and striated in a radiating manner. Beneath, the avenues are lanceolate. Their immediate border con- sists of longitudinal fasciculi of spines, four or five in each fasciculus. Next to these are regular transverse rows of spines placed on transverse ridges, eight or ten in each row. The third series forms a bordering to the arms, and consists of sets of from eighteen to twenty long fasciculated spines placed on broad compressed articulated bases. The mouth is protected by a beautiful and peculiar mechanism. The angles formed by the joined origins of the rays each bear an ovate sub-triangular plate, grooved down the centre, and carrying two semicircles of long tapering spines, which project in a comb-like manner over the mouth. A similar organization is seen in the purple Sun-star. In the genus Solaster the eyelid is not composed of a circle of spines, as in most of the allied genera ; but of a transverse terminal row, which laps like the fingers of a hand over the eye. In Solaster papposa these spines are separate, and much longer than those around them ; but in Solaster endeca they are united together, or webbed,' so as to form an almost solid piece, which is bilobed. This eyelid forms a very perfect protection to the eye, and if closed, it is extremely difficult to force it open against the 114 SOLASTERIJE. animaFs will. In the very young Solaster papposa the eye-spines are very large in proportion to the length of the rays, forming nearly a third of their length ; and the eyes are fully formed even then, appearing like large ver- milion specks near the ends of the rays on the under side. In a specimen of Solaster endeca , in which a ray had been broken and regenerated, the eye was present, also the eyelid, though not so prominent as usual. In cabinet specimens of Solaster papposa the eyelids are frequently destroyed by handling, their position rendering them very liable to injury. The Solaster papposa varies much in colour. Some- times the whole upper surface is deep purple. Frequently the disk is red, and the rays white, tipped with red. I once took a large specimen having the body entirely deep red, and the spiniferous tubercles bright green, presenting a very beautiful appearance. Beneath, it is generally white, or straw colour. Very young specimens are alto- gether white, with the exception of the red eyes. It grows to a considerable size. I have taken several mea- suring nine inches across, and Mr. Ball has found one eleven inches broad. It is very ravenous, devouring shellfish. Mr. W. Thompson has found a Cyprsea and Turbo Crassior in its stomach, — shells not often forming the food of Starfishes. It frequents oyster and scallop banks, often in great numbers, and sometimes colonises the sides of harbours frequented by oyster-dredgers, in company with TJr aster rubens ; but while the Crossfish puts up with this forced littoral habitation, the Common Sun-star soon grows tired of his new position, and in a few days generally leaves, probably seeking for deeper water, and a more abundant supply of food. The Solaster papposa seems to be generally distributed COMMON SUN-STAR. 115 round the British shores, on the east coasts of England and Scotland. It is found at Scarborough, by Mr. Bean, “ very common at low tides at Stockton, by Mr. Hogg, “not unfrequently on the coast 'of Northumberland, common, by Mr. Alder ; at Berwick, by Dr. Johnston ; and it is very abundant in the Frith of Forth. Mr. Good- sir and I found it in Orkney in ten fathoms water. On the west coast of Scotland it is frequent, and abundant in the Irish Sea. Mr. Couch finds it in Cornwall. In Ireland, Mr. Thompson informs me it is common. Mr. Ball finds it at Youghal, and states that at Portmarnock it is often thrown ashore in large quantities. This species is found on all the coasts of Scandinavia, and probably on all those of western Europe. M. Collard de Cherres re- cords it along with Ur aster rubens and glacialis as an in- habitant of the seas near Finisterre. I am not aware of its ever having been observed in the Mediterranean. La- marck says it inhabits the Asiatic seas. Grew mentions this Starfish in his account of the Mu- seum of the Royal Society ; he says it is “ by some called Sunfish : ’twas taken in the British seas.” i 2 116 GONIASTERI.fE. ASTERIA DAE. GONIA STERIJE. Genus Palmipes. Link. Agassiz. Generic Character . — Body pentagonal, flat, thin, covered above and beneath with fasciculated spines ; avenues bordered by longitudinal fasciculi of spines ; suckers biserial. THE BIRD’S-FOOT SEA-STAB. Palmipes membranaceus. Retz. Specific Character. — Lobes broad, ample, subacute. Colour, white, with red rays and border. Asterias membranaceus, Retz. Gmel. Syst. Nat. 3164. Lamarck, An. sans Vert. 1 Edit. vol. II. p. 558 ; 2 Edit. vol. III. p. 244. Stella quinquefida palmipes , Link, p. 29, t. i. f. 2. Asterias placenta. Pennant, Brit. An. IV. p. 62, tab. xxi. fig. 59, A. Asterias cartalaginea , Flem. Brit. An. p. 485. Palmipes membranaceus , Agassiz, Prod. Forbes, Wem. Mem. VIII. p. 119. bird’s-foot sea-star. 117 The Bird’s-foot Starfish is a very singular species. It is the thinnest and flattest of all its class. When alive, it is flexible, like a piece of leather ; and a person who had never seen it before, would he apt to mistake it for the torn away dorsal integument of some gibbous Goniaster. It is white, with a red centre, and five red rays proceeding from it to the angles, and the margin is generally bordered with red. The upper surface is covered with spiniferous tubercles, which are arranged differently on the white and coloured parts. On the red disk and radiations they are smaller and closer together than on the rest of the body, and are arranged irregularly. On the white portions they are arranged in regular rows, the largest tubercles being towards the disk. On the red margins they are very small, and closely placed in regular rows, running from the edge towards the centre. Each of these marginal rows has a tuft of spines at its extremity, projecting beyond the out- line of the body. The spines are short, acute, very numerous, and radiate on the summits of the somewhat oblong tubercles. When they are rubbed away in a dried specimen, the surface of the skin appears regularly tes- selated. The madreporiform tubercle is small, flat, striat- ed, and placed towards the centre of the disk. Beneath, the spiniferous tubercles cover the triangular spaces, and are arranged in regular rows. They differ greatly in form from those above, being linear, and bearing the spines in a single row of from five to nine in number, the central ones longest. This arrangement gives a pectinated ap- pearance to the tubercles. The avenues are bordered by longitudinal fasciculi of larger spines ; those immediately around the mouth are largely developed. At each angle the margin is notched, and forms a little hood for the protection of the eye. 118 G0NIASTERIJ3. This species grows to the size of five or even six inches in diameter. It is generally accounted very rare, but is by no means uncommon in deep water in the Irish Sea off the coast of the Isle of Man, where I have dredged many specimens. On the English coast it was long ago noticed by Pennant, who describes it from Weymouth. Mr. Couch takes it in Cornwall. Mr. Hogg, in his Natural History of Stockton-on-Tees, records a specimen “caught near Hartlepool, in the summer of 1821.” In Ireland, Mr. Templeton found it in Strangford Loch, where it has also occurred to Mr. Thompson. Mr. Ball found a specimen six inches in diameter at Youghal, the only one he ob- tained, though said by the fishermen not to be uncommon there. The Rev. Mr. Landsborough has found it on the coast of Ayrshire in Scotland. The Palmipes membranaceus ranges from the Arctic seas to the Mediterranean ; and there are one or two other species belonging to the genus. The Asterias calcar of Lamarck, a native of the seas of New Holland, is referable to it ; and the Asterias rosacea of the same author is nearly allied to our native species. Comparing the BirdVfoot Sea-star with its exotic allies, it would seem that colour is a true source of specific character in this genus, and that the form, depth, and acumination of the lobes are also cha- racters of great importance. THE GIBBOUS STARLET. 119 ASTERIADJE. GONIA STERIJE . Genus, Asterina. Nardo. Generic Character. — Body pentagonal, gibbous, thick, covered above and below with short spines ; avenues bordered by a single row of spines ; suckers biserial. THE GIBBOUS STARLET. Asterina gibbosa. Pennant. Specific Character. — Dorsal spines short, thick, arranged in pairs ; spines beneath in regular rows. Pentaceros plicatus , Stellula hibernica glabra , Asterias exigua , Asterias minuta , Asterina minuta , Asterina gibbosa , Link, t. xxxvi. No. 62. Borlase, Cornwall, p. 260, t. xxv. f. 25, 26. Petiver, Gaz. t. xvi. f. 8. Pennant, Brit. Zool. IV. p. 62, No. 59. Lamarck, 1 Edit. vol. II. p. 554 ; 2 Edit. vol. III. p. 241. Blainville, Man. d’Actin. p. 238. Nardo. Agassiz, Prod. Forbes, Wern. Mem. VIII. p. 120. The Asterina gibbosa is the least of the British Asteriada. Large specimens measure only an inch across. The body is pentangular, with the angles produced. It is very gibbous. Above, it is covered with tufts of short thick 120 GONIASTERIJ2. spines, ranging from two to six in each tuft, arranged in regular rows, which on the rays proceed from the disk to the angles. The madreporiform tubercle is small, coarsely striate, and sub-central in its position. Beneath, the tri- angular spaces are covered with spines, arranged similarly with those above, but not grouped in tufts, being mostly single. The avenues are very narrow and deep, and are bordered by longitudinal tufts of spines arranged in threes. The spines of the surface behind these are in some speci- mens longer than usual, and arranged in pairs, so as to present the appearance of a second set of border spines. A semicircle of seven or eight long stout spines project from the oral angle of each triangular space, and form a sort of cover to the mouth. The avenues widen at the extremities so as to expose the eyes, and thus give a notched appearance to the angles. The colour is generally greenish yellow, sometimes tinged with red, and sometimes brownish. The largest specimen with which I am ac- quainted is one in Mr. Ball’s collection, measuring one inch and five lines across. The Gibbous Starlet is widely distributed on our coasts, though apparently confined to the western and southern shores of Britain. It was noticed as a British species at a very early period. Petiver figures it as “ Luid’s small Donegal Sea-star.” Link also figures it as British from Luid. In England it is found in Cornwall by Mr. Couch, where it was also observed by Borlase. In the Isle of Man I find it in pools among the limestone rocks at Castletown when the tide goes out ; and Dr. Coldstream found many specimens in the same locality. I have taken it in similar situations though not on the same sort of rock, in Herm, one of the Channel Islands. In Scotland I have found it on the gneiss shores of Ross-shire. In Ireland, GIBBOUS STARLET, 121 Mr. W. Thompson says it is found all around the coast in pools among the rocks at low water ; such would appear to be its locality everywhere. I have never heard of a specimen being taken by the dredge. The differences in the rise and fall of tides, which so materially affect the localities of other species, do not appear to change its habitation. This species extends its range to the Medi- terranean, where it is common, and probably occurs on all the shores of Europe. Blainville has separated it into two species, Asterias minuta and Asterias 'pulchella , and figures the last in the Fauna Frangaise ; but I cannot find good specific distinction between them, and (after having ex- amined specimens of each) regard them as specifically identical. A nearly allied form is found on the west coast of South America. The vignette is a view of Belfast Bay, from a sketch by my friend Mr. Thompson, whose observations have made it a classical locality to the zoologist. 122 GONIA STERILE. ASTER1ADJE. G ON I A S TERIJE. Genus Goniaster. Agassiz. Generic Character . — Body pentagonal, gibbous, thick, bordered by a series of laminae edged with spines ; avenues bordered by transverse rows of spines ; suckers biserial. TEMPLETON’S CUSHION-STAR. Goniaster Templet oni. Thompson. Specific Character. — Body above and below smooth ; tessellae of the triangular spaces mostly quadrangular. Goniaster Templetoni , Forbes, Wem. Mem. VIII. p. 118, pi. iv. fig. 1, 2. The Goniaster s bear much analogy to certain Sea- Urchins. They may be regarded as connecting the true Asteriadee with the Ecliinida. This connection is seen in the general form of all the species, and in the structure of the spines in such as are spiniferous. The capital of the genus appears to be situated in the eastern seas. In our own seas we have two species belonging to two differ- ent sections ; such of the Cushion-stars as have naked bodies, and such as are covered with spines. The pentangular Templeton's cushion-star. 123 form and gibbous body is characteristic of all the true Goniasters ; and the border of marginal plates distinguishes them from Asterina and connects them with Aster las. The Goniaster Templetoni has the body very convex, smooth, and lubricous when fresh, though when dried it becomes granularly reticulated. Though there are no spines there are here and there little pointed forceps- shaped spinules, the remains of pedicellarise, which, when the animal is alive, give a villous appearance to the sur- face. These organs are seen on the skin of most of the Starfishes. In the next species they are larger than in any other British Sea-star. There are sometimes a few true spines seen towards the apices of the rays or angles of this Cushion-star ; but these are by no means constant. The margins of the body above are bordered by rows of oblong plates, which bear at their outer edges fasciculi of from two to four conical spines. The madreporiform tubercle is small, finely striate in a radiating manner, and placed about half way between the centre and the margin, with which it appears to communicate by a furrow or canal. Besides the madreporiform tubercle, in one speci- men which I possess, there is on the disk, in the very centre, a circle of short, thick, sub-globose spines. Be- neath, the triangular spaces are smooth and tessellated by oblong plates, which are mostly quadrangular. The mar- gins of the avenues are bordered by transverse rows of long pointed spines, two or three spines in each row. Two spines shorter than the rest, and placed close together, project over the mouth from the oral angle of each trian- gular space. The eyes are placed beneath, near the ex- tremities of the tentacular avenues, and do not seem to be protected by spines. The colour of this species is very beautiful ; bright scarlet above, sometimes with cloudy 124 G0NIASTERIJ2. whitish markings, and straw colour beneath. The largest specimen I have taken measured three inches and a half across ; generally they are little more than half that size. This species was named by my friend, Mr. W. Thomp- son, after the late Mr. Templeton, so well known for his researches in the natural history of Ireland. It is the species recorded as Irish by Mr. Templeton under the name of “ Asterias equestris in his papers on the Ra- diate Animals of Ireland, in the ninth volume of the Magazine of Natural History. The specimen there men- tioned was “ found by James Grimshaw, Esq. in Belfast Loch;” it was thrown ashore after a storm. Mr. Gray showed me specimens in the British Museum obtained by Dr. Leach in Plymouth Sound. As long ago as 1819, Mr. Ball obtained several specimens from the Nymph Bank, off Waterford. They were brought up on long lines. Dr. Coldstream found it some years ago in Bute. Mr. Smith, of Jordan Hill, has taken it by dredging near the same island, and also in Lamlash Bay, in the island of Arran. Mr. Philip Maclagan found it on the coast of Ayrshire, and Dr. Pollexfen on the shores of Orkney. I have dredged it frequently on the north-western coast of the Isle of Man, where it lives among scallops in deep water. I do not think it has been observed on the eastern coast as yet. The Asterias pul villus of Muller, Zoologia Danica, tab. xci. nearly resembles this Cushion-star. The attitude there drawn is frequently presented by our animal when alive. The form of the tessellse on the under surface is, however, so different that I dare not venture to consider the species identical with ours, especially as the tessellse are of specific importance in this genus. Professor Agassiz informs me that Dr. Fleming’s specimen of his Asterias irregularis is this species. KNOTTY CUSHION-STAR. 125 ASTERIA DM. GONIASTERVE. KNOTTY CUSHION-STAR. Goniaster equestris. Ganelin. Specific Character. — Body above and below covered with mammiform tuber- cular spines. Asterias equestris , Gmel. 3164 ? Sowerby’s Brit. Misc. No. 2, p. 8, pi. lxiii. Lam. vol. II. p. 555 ; 2 Edit.vol. III. p. 242 ? Encyc. Meth. pis. ci. cii. Flem. Brit. An. p. 485. Jameson, Wern. Mem. I. p. 559. Pentaceros planus, Link, p. 21, t. xii. f. 21 ; t. xxxiii. f. 53. Ag. Prod. , Johnston, Mag. Nat. Hist. v. IV. p. 146, f. 21. Lam. An. sans Vert. 2 Edit. vol. III. p. 257. Goniaster equestris , Var. Asterias Jonstoni , 126 G0NIASTER1J3. This Cushion-star is one of the rarest and most beau- tiful of our native Starfishes. It was first figured as British by Mr. Sowerby in the British Miscellany, from a specimen “found by James Brodie, Esq. in February 1806, on the coast near Brodie House,” in the north of Scotland. Pro- fessor Jameson had recorded it in the Wernerian Me- moirs, as having been found “by Mr. (now Dr.) Neill near Newhaven in the Frith of Forth.” The figure I have given was drawn by Mr. John Thornhill, from a specimen obtained by a fisherman off Cullercoats, Northumberland, now in the collection of Mr. Richard R. Wingate, the celebrated animal preserver of Newcastle, through whose kindness I am enabled to present the following original description drawn up with the assistance of my distin- guished friend, Mr. Alder. The diameter of the Newcastle specimen, the largest British example with which I am acquainted, is nine inches and three-fourths. The form is sub-pentangular. The upper surface is covered with irregularly placed mam- miform tubercular spines, varying from the one-eighth to the one-thirty-second of an inch in diameter, and of about the same height. These spines are smooth, and are placed in the centres of nearly circular plates, each of which is surrounded by a border of minute tubercles. The inter- mediate spaces are granulated by similar tubercles, among which are scattered furrowed forceps-like spinules, which are long and equal in shape. The madreporiform tuber- cle is sub-central and small. The margins of the upper surface are bordered by two rows of plates, varying in shape, but mostly oblong, with nearly semicircular ends, their longest sides being in juxta-position. These plates are smooth, raised in the centre, and bear from one to three mammiform tubercular spines. A border of small KNOTTY CUSHION-STAR. 127 tubercles surrounds their margins. The under surface is bordered by similar but flatter rows of spiniferous plates with those above. These plates are pentangular. The triangular spaces between the avenues are covered with mammiform tubercular spines, similar to those on the upper side, but smaller, and not placed as on the upper surface in the centre of plates. The intermediate spaces are interspersed with minute tubercles, which, however, do not surround the bases of the spines in a regular manner as they do on the upper side. Forceps-like spinules, simi- lar to but larger than those on the upper side, are arranged in regular transverse and longitudinal rows in each of the triangular spaces. The margins of the avenues are bordered by longitudinal rows of spines arranged in pairs, and an outer series of plates, each bearing from three to five long obtuse blunt spines, placed in transverse rows. Each arm is terminated by a blunt and regular tubercle. When fresh, Mr. Wingate states his specimen was of a 1 v!0a0 3 4 128 GONIASTERI.E. pale orange colour. It is in fine preservation, although it is now twelve years ago since it was taken. Mr. Brodie’s specimen was bright red above ; beneath, yel- lowish with red margins. In the vignette on the preceding page, the two first figures represent the tubercles and spinules of the surface and border of the lower surface ; the third and fourth those of the upper. In the Magazine of Natural History for March 1836, Dr. Johnston describes and figures a Starfish from the coast of Caithness, under the name of Asterias Jonstoni, which I regard as a variety of this species. Dr. J ohnston says, 44 Mr. J. E. Gray, who has examined the specimen figured, tells me that it is quite distinct from the true Asterias equestris ; and he has in consequence assigned to it the specific name which is here adopted. I am, nevertheless, convinced the species is identical with the Asterias equestris of British authors.” The specimen is now in the British Museum, and seems to be a four-angled form of this Cushion-star. Such a variation of form is not uncommon in the genus Goniaster. Dr. Johnston describes his animal thus : 44 Body square ; sinuated between the angles, of which two are somewhat more produced than the others, flat, rough, with papillary warts and miliary granules, the latter encircling the dilated smooth base of the obtuse papillae ; these granules and warts cover the surface, but in the centre of a ring of granules there are frequently small apertures protected by a pair of roundish scales, which open and shut at the will of the animal ; operculum lateral, slightly convex, deeply grooved, the grooves branched ; margin obtuse, thick, protected by a double series of large square plates, studded with from two to four papillae, and each of them surrounded with a series of granules; the KNOTTY CUSHION-STAR. 129 ventral surface is divided into four triangular spaces by the tentacular avenues, which are fringed on each side with a double series of smooth, blunt, short, and slightly com- pressed processes or spines ; the triangular spaces are very rough with enlarged granules and valvular openings ; but there are no dilated bases for papillae, and the valvular apertures are arranged in rows ; in the centre of each of the compartments there is a large irregular opening. When fresh, the colour is a bright red or scarlet, but on keeping, the colour fades to a faint and dirty brownish yellow.1’ Mr. Couch records the occurrence of one specimen of this variety on the coast of Cornwall, in his Cornish Fauna. K 130 ASTERIA!. Genus Asterias. Linnseus. Agassiz. Generic Character. — Body stellate ; rays flat, with a border of marginal plates ; avenues bordered by three sets of spines ; suckers biserial. THE BUTTHORN. Asterias aurantiaca. Linnseus. Specific Character. — Disk broad ; rays lanceolate ; margin spinose. Asterias aurantiaca (or aranciaca), Linn. Syst. Nat. 1100. Muller, Zool. Dan. Prod. 2831 ; Zool. Dan. III. tab. lxxxiii. Lamarck, Anim. sans Vert. vol. II. p. 563 ; 2 Edit. vol. III. p. 251. Fleming, Brit. An. p. 486. Johnston, Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. IX. p. 299, f. 44. Forbes, Wern. Mem. VIII. p. 118. Asterias irregularis, Pennant, Brit. Zool. IV. p. 61, No. 57. BUTTHOKN. 131 Astropecten , Link, t. y. vi. £ 5, 13; t, viii. £11, 12 ; tab. iv. f. 14 ; t. xxyii. £ 44. „ Encrc. Mcth. pi. cx. f. 1-5 ; pi. cxi. f. 1-6. „ Bradley, W orks of Nature. Far. ? Asterias Jonstoni , Della Chiagi, Mem. tom. II. p. 356. Stella Marina minor , Jonston, Historia Naturalis, t. viii. £11. The genus for which the name of Asterias has been specially reserved is one of the most elegant of its tribe, the shape of the species it includes being more regular than that of any other Starfishes. There is hut one species belonging to it a native of Britain, the Asterias aranciaca or aurantiaca , for the name has been written indifferently either way. It has five equal lanceolate arms, with straight sides, which are bordered by transversely oblong plates. The whole of the disk, and the surface of the arms within the borders, are thickly set with tubercles, crowned by circles or gvoups of minute spines. These are placed suffi- ciently close together to give the surface a compact ap- pearance. In the centre of the arms and disk they are arranged irregularly, but on the sides there is a tendency to a transverse linear arrangement. The centre of the disk is prominent, and the madreporiform tubercle is small, striate, and very lateral, being placed close to the junction of two of the arms. The marginal plates are prominent and rounded. Their surface is thickly studded with minute tubercles, and their summits are often furnished with two or three short acute conical spines. The sides of the rays at the junction of the upper and lower surfaces are fringed by a border of numerous long, lanceolate, flattened spines. On the under surface, between these and the immediate borders of the avenues, is a broad space covered by thick- set transverse plates, each of which bears upon its summit seven or eight diverging oblique rows of short, flattened, clavate spines. The spines immediately bordering the 132 ASTEBIiE. avenues are mucli longer, similar in form, and arranged in transverse fasciculi. The mouth is guarded by a mechanism similar to that seen in the Solasters ; oval plates at the oral junctions of the rays, bearing four series of upright spines on their surface, and a comb of about seven long spines projecting over the mouth. In this species the points of the five combs nearly meet, so as to form a very efficient protection. Such a protection is more needed in the Butthorn than in other Starfishes, as its body and arms are not nearly so flexible. The extremity of each ray is turned up, and presents a circle of blunt spines forming the eyelid. This species sometimes measures six inches across ; generally from three to five. Mr. Ball says it grows to nine at Youghal. It is extremely variable, varying in the form of the rays, in the number of border-plates, and the presence or absence of spines upon them, and in colour. These variations have given rise to the creation of several spurious species, such as the Asterias Jonstoni , and penta- cantha of Della Chiagi, and the Asterias spinulosa , platya- cantha and subinermis of Phillippi ; perhaps, also, the Asterias bispinosa of Otto. There has been a fancy among naturalists to split up the Linnsean Asterias aurantiaca , which has been carried much too far. Species have been founded on the breadth of the rays, — a point in which every specimen differs more or less from another ; and on the number of the marginal plates, which varies according to age and size. The spines seen sometimes on the mar- ginal plates furnish no true characters, as specimens not unfrequently occur in which the plates of one ray bear spines, and those of the other are naked. The form of the border spines also varies exceedingly, even in the same specimen. The colour, sometimes altogether brick-red BUTTHORN. 133 above, sometimes a light pink or yellow, with purple tips to the rays, furnishes no better characters. I have now before me nine specimens taken at random from various localities. They differ much in form, size and colour. Four of them are from the east coast of Scotland ; their marginal plates present all variations of spinosity, and are severally on each side of the rays, thirty-two, twenty-five, thirty-three, and thirty-four. The largest mea- sures five inches across, that having twenty-five plates only three. One is from the east coast of Scotland ; it measures above five inches, and the rays have thirty-eight spineless plates on each of their sides. One is from Shetland; it measures nearly three inches across, the number of plates on each ray-margin is twenty-seven. Each plate bears one spine. Two fresh specimens, a very little larger, present re- spectively the numbers twenty-nine and twenty-three, and the plates are spineless. A specimen from the Mediterranean differs in no essential points from these. It measures three and a half inches across ; the sides of each ray are bor- dered by thirty plates, which bear two or three spines each. Considering, therefore, these variations to arise merely from age or situation, I see no ground for making more than one species out of the Linnsean aurantiaca. Sometimes the whole of the upper surface is covered by an adhesive glutinous matter, but this is by no means con- stant. This variety is common in some parts of the Frith of Forth. The species is very generally distributed. On some of the southern shores of England it is common. Mr. Harvey took it abundantly at Teignmouth. Dr. J ohnston takes it at Berwick-on-Tweed ; Mr. Bean at Scarborough. It is generally distributed on the coasts of Scotland, and occurs in both Orkney and Shetland. In Ayrshire it is found by Mr. P. Maclagan. On the Manx coast it has 134 ASTEKLE. been taken by Mr. Wallace. In Ireland, Mr. W. Thomp- son finds it on the coast of Down and Antrim, and Mr. Ball at Youghal, from whence he has a specimen in his collection seven and a half inches in diameter. In several specimens he found Natica Alderi in its stomach, and one contained nine of that shell with a Turritella Terebra. He takes them in deep water. In Donegal Bay it is common on a sandy bottom. It has been taken abundantly in Ross Bay (county Cork) by trawling, by Mr. George J. Allman of Bandon, who finds it on all the south-west coast of Cork. I do not think it is ever a littoral species; and those I have dredged were always taken on sandy ground. I have one with a small Venus cassina in its stomach. Mr. Bean has communicated the following account of a singular superstition in regard to this species observed by the fishermen of his neighbourhood. “ Our fishermen call this species a Butthorn. The first taken is carefully made a prisoner, and placed on a seat at the stern of the boat. When they hook a But (Holibut) they immediately give the poor Starfish its liberty, and commit it to its native element ; but if their fishery is unsuccessful it is left to perish, and may eventually enrich the cabinet of some in- dustrious collector.” The vignette represents the “ dreg,” an instrument used by the Shetlanders for procuring shells, &c. from deep water. LINGTHORN. 135 ASTERIADJE. ASTERISK. Genus Luidia. Forbes. Generic Character. — Body stellate ; rays flat, covered above with spiniferous tubercles ; avenues bordered by two sets of spines ; suckers biserial. THE LINGTHORN. Luidia fragillissima. Forbes. Luidia fragillissima , Forbes, Wern. Mem. VIII. p. 123. Asterias rubens , Johnston, Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. IX. p. 144, fig. 20. Asterias pectinata, Couch, Mag. Nat. Hist. New Series, Jan. 1840. In my Memoir on the Asteriadse of the Irish Sea, pub- lished in the Wernerian Memoirs for 1839, I constituted 136 ASTEKLE. the genus Luidia for the reception of the most remarkable and largest of all our British Starfishes. Generally dis- tributed as this beautiful species appears to be on the shores of Britain, it altogether escaped observation, or rather description, until the year 1836, when Dr. Johnston figured and described it in the Magazine of Natural His- tory under the name of Asterias rubens , with which species, however, it has no relation, being next door neighbour to Asterias aranciaca on the one hand, and the Ophiura on the other. With no native or foreign Starfish can it be confounded. I have dedicated the genus to the name of Edward Llhuyd, one of the earliest observers of our native Star- fishes, and from whom Link derived many materials for his work. Llhuyd was born in Carmarthenshire, in the year 1670; was a student of Jesus College, Oxford ; suc- ceeded Dr. Plot as head keeper of the Ashmolean Museum ; travelled for scientific purposes throughout England, Scot- land, Ireland, and Brittany, and died in the year 1709. He was a man of great knowledge and great talent. His studies were extended over large tracts of science and lite- rature, and he enlightened both with his researches and his writings. He united a comprehensive and philosophical mind with an observing eye, and the energy to execute. Amid the multiplicity of his studies there was no confusion. He wrote on insects, plants, fossils, antiquities, and lan- guages ; on all much and well. His principal works were “ Lythophylacii Britt anici Ichnographia,” and “ Archseo- logia Brittaniea.” Ray praised him. Strange to say his name is omitted in many of our cyclopedias, which devote whole pages to men of less repute. The Luidia fragillissima when full grown measures two feet across, and would appear to exceed that size occa- LINGTHORN. 137 sionally, judging from fragments. The rays are from five to seven in number, quite flat, and generally five times as long as the disk is broad. Commonly they taper very gradually; hut in some of the specimens from the east coast they are broadest towards the middle, as represented in Dr. Johnston’s figure. The upper surface of both rays and disk is covered with tubercles, each bearing a radiat- ing circle of from six to eight sub-clavate papillose spines, generally with from one to three short clavate spines in the centre. These tubercles are very closely set, so as to give the surface when not looked at near a very compact appearance. Dr. Johnston says the circle of spines crown- ing the tubercles can be expanded or closed at the will of the animal. Towards the sides of the rays the tubercles are arranged in regular transverse rows. The margins of the rays are bordered by long rounded spines, which are arranged in rows of four or five placed on regular trans- verse ridges ; the uppermost spines are thickest. The spines forming the immediate borders of the avenues are long, slender, and angular, and are also placed on trans- verse ridges. The madreporiform tubercle is extremely lateral, almost marginal, and reticularly striate. The suckers are placed in two rows in each avenue, and are very long and cylindrical, not inflated as in the last genus. The eyes are placed in the centre of a circle of spines at the extremities of the rays. The colour is brick-red above, varying in intensity ; the under surface and lateral spines are straw coloured. This species varies in the number and proportion of its arms. They are always either five or seven : I know of no specimen as yet found having six arms. Those found on the east coast have generally smaller tubercles on the less tapering rays than the specimens from the west or 138 ASTERISK. north. This equally applies to five and seven rayed ex- amples. At one time I fancied the five-rayed Luidia was a distinct species, conceiving that in a genus approaching the Ophiura: we should probably find a greater specific constancy in the number of rays than in the other Asteri- ade, which have a proboscis, having a long fleshy appendage attached. They have no tentacula, and their vent is placed at the posterior extremity. Generic characters in the first of these families depend on the form of the tentacula ; in the last on the presence, absence, and arrangement of corneous bristles on certain parts of the body. Of the Priapulacese there is but one genus known. Specific characters throughout the tribes appear to depend on variations of the integument and on proportions of parts. Colour would appear to be of little or no value, except perhaps in the last family. ROUGH SYRINX. 245 SIPUNCULIDJE. SIPUNCULA CEM Genus Syrinx. Bohadsch. Generic Character. — Trunk cylindrical, shorter than the body, having a circle of short digitate tentacula near its extremity. ROUGH SYRINX. Syrinx nudus. Linnaeus. Specific Character. — Body rugose, with deep reticulating striae; posterior ex- tremity ventricose, smooth, furrowed longitudinally; trunk granulated, except near the extremity. Syrinx , Bohadsch, Anim. Mar. p. 93, t. vii. f. 6, 7. Sipunculus nudus, Linnaeus, 12th Edit. p. 1078. Gmelin, p. 3094. Pennant, Brit. Zool. vol. IV. p. 36, t. xx. fig. 10. Fleming, Brit. An. p. 491. Lamarck, 2 Edit' vol. III. p. 469. Gray, Spicel. Zool. p. 8. Sipunculus halanaphorus , Della Chiagi, Mem. t. i. pt. II. p. 22, pi. 1. Syrinx tessellatus , Rafinesque, Precis, p. 82. The Rough Syrinx, or Tube- worm, as Pennant styles it, attains the length of from six to eight inches. The 246 SIPUNCULACEJE. body is cylindrical, and covered with a strong coriaceous integument, which, being longitudinally furrowed, and deeply striated transversely, is very rugose, except at the posterior extremity, which is inflated, smooth, and longi- tudinally grooved to near its termination The vent is situated at some distance from the origin of the proboscis, which is short, not more than one-tenth the length of the body. It is minutely granulated, saving near its ex- tremity, which is surrounded by a rim of digitated ten- tacular filaments, webbed together at their bases. On opening the specimen I have figured (which was taken by Mr. Harvey at Teignmouth), I found a somewhat simple intestine filled with coarse sand. There were two genital tubes, each lobed into a second smaller one at its base, the largest lobe being filled with yellowish eggs. What ap- peared to be respiratory tubes were very large, and at- tached to the sides by a mesentery. Pennant notices and figures this animal, but does not mention a locality ; and I am not sure that his figure represents the same species : it appears to be derived from the representation of Bondeletius. The original animal of Bohadsch is evidently identical, as may be seen from the copy of Bohadsch’s figure, which I have introduced for comparison. He says that it is of a whitish yellow colour, that it never contracts itself into a ball, and that it lives in the deep sea, whence it is never cast on shore, save when it enters the nets along with fishes. RAPILLATED SYRINX. 247 S1PUNCULIDM. SIPUNCULACEJE. PAPILLATED SYRINX. Syrinx papillosus. Thompson. Specific Character. — Brownish or mottled ; skin striated concentrically, and covered with brown papillae. Sipunculus papillosus, Thompson, Ann. Nat. Hist. vol. V. No. 29, p. 101. (April 1840.) This handsome species, measuring four inches in length, and portly in proportion, appears to have escaped descrip- tion until very lately, when Mr. Thompson had the plea- sure of introducing it to the public, characterizing it from specimens obtained at Miltown Malbay, on the coast of Clare, by Mr. Harvey, and at the south islands of Arran, Ireland, by Mr. Ball. Captain Portlock has taken many specimens on the north coast of Ireland ; and its geogra- phical range would appear to be extensive, as Mr. Gray showed me a bottle full of specimens in the British Museum, which came from the West Indies. According to Mr. Harvey, it lives under stones among sand-covered rocks. It is of a brownish white colour, often with dark markings of brown, and has its tough skin finely striated longitudinally and concentrically, and covered with brown papillse, which are more numerous on the sides than on the 248 SIPUNCULACEJ3. dorsal and ventral surfaces, and are most numerous at the posterior extremity, which tapers to a point. The pro- boscis (which is retracted in the figure, drawn from a specimen in spirits) is about one-third the length of the body, and is provided towards its extremity with a circle of tentacular filaments, flattened, lanceolate, and jagged, or digitate at the edges. The vent opens near its back. On opening the creature we find no dental processes, but a digestive apparatus, consisting of a narrow oesophagus, which opens into an intestine twisting spirally on itself to the posterior extremity of the body, and then returning in a similar manner along the same spiral to the vent, on each side of which is a short brown muscular tube, probably respiratory. The vascular system is complicated, and the nervous consists of a strong nervous cord, which runs along the abdominal surface of the animal terminating posteriorly in numerous filaments, and anteriorly by two delicate threads which surround the oesophagus where it joins the base of the proboscis. The vignette is a view from Leith Roads. HARVEY S SYRINX. 249 SIPUNCULIDJE. SIPUNCULACEM. HARVEY’S SYRINX. Syrinx Harveii. Forbes. Specific Character. — Body smooth, except at the posterior extremity and at the origin of the trunk, where it is finely reticulated ; trunk short, the upper two-thirds smooth, with the exception of a hand of minute bristles near the ex- tremity. Through the kindness of Mr. Waterhouse I am enabled to give a description and figure of this very distinct species, discovered by his friend, Mr. Harvey of Teignmouth, who for some years so successfully investigated the marine fauna of that interesting locality, and who has since dipped his dredge in the seas of the Antipodes with equal success. I have dedicated the species to its discoverer. It measures two inches and a half in length. The body is quite smooth, except at the two extremities, where it is finely reticulated. The skin is tender and very lax, which makes me suspect that some of the animals described under the name of Sipunculus saccatus (as that mentioned in “ Martin’s Ma- rine Worms,”) and supposed to have been the cast skins of the nudus , may have belonged to this species. The proboscis is short, in the preserved specimen being only one-seventh the length of the body, and has a circle of bristly papillae surrounding it near its extremity. Beyond 250 SIPUNCULACEA3. these is a circle of tentacula, very numerous, and jagged at the edges. The internal structure resembles generally that of the last species, saving that in the specimen examined I could find no respiratory tubes. The muscles of the skin are very tender, and are strongest near the anterior extremity ; those of the trunk, however, are very strong, and bifurcated at their bases. There is a genital tube opening opposite the vent. The animal is of a pinkish colour. The pencil of my friend, Mr. G. J. Bell, has furnished the accompanying sketch of one of the dredger’s worst enemies, a squall. The scene is the Holy Loch in the Clyde district ; a province which, thanks to Mr. Smith, has contributed many rarities to the British Fauna. SHELL-BEARING SIPUNCULUS. 251 SIPUNCULIDJE. SIPUNCULACEJE. Genus Sipunculus. Linnseus. Generic Character. — Trunk cylindrical, long, having a circle of simple linear tentacula near its extremity. SHELL-BEARING SIPUNCULUS. Sipunculus Bernhardus. Forbes. Specific Character. — Body smooth anteriorly, studded with small bristles towards its obtuse posterior extremity ; trunk long, smooth, saving near the extremity, where it is surrounded by four rows of minute bristles. Sipunculus Stromhi, Montagu, Lin. Trans. VII. p. 74. Fleming, Brit. An. p. 491. Gray, Spicel. Zool. 8. B. Sipunculus Dentalii , Gray, Spicel. Zool. 8. The form of the tentacula and the general habit of the animals, distinguish the genus Sipunculus from Syrinx. 252 SIPUNCULACEiE. The species bury in sand, or in the crevices of rocks, or, as is the custom of the curious animal before us, adopt the shells of dead univalve testacea for a house and home, after the manner of the Hermit Crab. The Sipunculus would appear, however, to be of a less changeable disposition of mind and body than its crustacean analogue, and when once securely housed in a shell to make that its permanent habitation. Whether the egg is originally deposited in the future habitation of the animal by some wonderful instinct, or is only developed when lodged by the waters in such a locality, or whether the parent Sipunculus bequeaths the chosen lodging of its caudal termination to its eldest born, and so on from generation to generation, a veritable entailed property, we know not at present ; but the inquiry is a most interesting one, and well worth the attention of the experimental zoologist. The Sipunculus is not, however, content with the habitation built for it by its Molluscan predecessor ; it exercises its own architectural ingenuity, and secures the entrance of its shell by a plaster-work of sand, leaving a round hole in the centre sufficiently large to admit of the protrusion of its trunk, which it sends out to a great length, and moves about in all directions with great facility. This trunk is long and cylindrical, and slightly enlarged at its extremity, where it is surrounded by about twenty or more linear-lanceolate tentacula, which are very seldom protruded. Behind these tentacula are four circles of minute bristles. The trunk can be entirely retracted within the body. In the lowermost figure I have represented the Sipunculus alive in a Periwinkle shell, of which I have broken away the upper part in order to show the animaFs body ; the figure immediately above represents the creature freed from the shell, but with the trunk retracted ; and the two uppermost represent the animal SHELL-BEARING SIPUNCULUS. 253 with all its parts expanded, as seen after preservation in spirits, and the head magnified under the same circum- stances. Near the junction of the trunk with the body is seen the vent ; the body itself is smooth, with the excep- tion of the posterior portion, where there are minute bristles arranged at regular distances. The colour of the creature is white, and it can extend itself to more than three inches in length. The internal structure of the animal is not so complicated as that of a Syrinx, and the digestive system is much more simple. The shells selected by this Sipunculus for its habitation are usually specimens of the Strombus Pes-Pelicanus, and Turritella Terehra ; but I have also seen it in Littorina littorea, when that shell happened to fall into sufficiently deep water, and Dentalius Entalis is frequently adopted by it. The parasite of the last named shell Mr. Gray considers a distinct species, and has published it as such ; but after examining many both living and dead, I am reluctantly obliged to differ from that distinguished zoolo- gist’s opinion, and to regard the characters he has given as dependent on accidental causes ; namely, the contraction of specimens preserved in spirits, and the form of the shell in which they were parasitical. The Sipunculus Bernhardus (I have thought proper so to style it, in order to prevent the confusion arising’ from naming it after the shell which it inhabits) is found on most parts of the British coast. On the east, west, and north of Scotland it is frequent ; on the coast of Ireland not uncommon, and on the west and south coast of Eng- land by no means rare. It lives in from ten to thirty fathoms water. 254 SIPUNCULACE^E. SIP UNCULID7E. SIP UN CTJL ACE IE. JOHNSTON'S SIPUNCULUS. Sipunculus Johnstoni. Forbes. Specific Character . — Body rough, with minute papillae ; posterior extremity tapering to a point ; trunk smooth, nearly half the length of the body. This little species is one of the many discoveries of my valued friend, Dr. Johnston, who found it at Berwick, and to the pencil of his accomplished lady I am indebted for the figure of it. He writes me regarding it, — “ It is not uncommon sometimes at the roots of corallines, lurk- ing in the sand, the colour of which it resembles. It is rarely, I should think, half an inch long, contracts and lengthens itself, as is usual with the tribe, draws in the anterior end, and extends it as a snail doth its horns, and when it is fully extended there is an appearance of two minute papillae at the orifice.” Pallas, in his Miscellanea Zoologica, tab. x. figs. 7, 8, 9, has figured two English Sipuncular worms, which nearly approach the Sipunculus Johnstoni. The one he says he found among sand on the coast of Sussex in the year 1762 ; the other he states is black, smooth, and capable JOHNSTON S SIPUNCULUS. 255 of changing its body into many shapes. The notices are too imperfect to enable us to judge with certainty of the species; but I subjoin copies of the figures in the hopes of their leading to the rediscovery of the animals noticed by that most accurate observer. It is very probable that several other minute Sipunculi inhabit the British seas. Those of other regions have been still less attended to. 256 PKIAPULACE/E. SIP UNCULIDM. PR1APULACEJE. Grenus Priapulus. Lamarck. Generic Character. — Body cylindrical, having a trunk without tentacula, and a branched filamental caudal appendage, proceeding from the truncate posterior extremity. THE TAILED PRIAPULUS. Priapulus caudatus. Lam. Specific Character. — Body finely striated longitudinally and transversely by distant striae ; trunk striated longitudinally. Holothuria priapus, Lin. Syst. 1091. Fabricius, Fauna Groen. 355. Muller, Zool. Dan. Prod. 2807 ; Zool. Dan. t. xcvi. 1, and t. cxxxv. 2. Priapulus caudatus , Lam. 2 Edit. III. p. 467. Fleming, Brit. An. p. 491. TAILED PRIAPULUS. 257 The Priapulus is one of the most curious animals in- habiting the British seas. It is shaped like a dice-box, with a curious pyramidal filamentous tail at one end, and an equally curious sub-conical trunk at the other. When dredged up it presents little appearance of its tail, and still less of its trunk ; but if left undisturbed for a few moments the shapeless lump of white flesh, for such it seems to be, becomes suddenly animated, and with a fierce energy assumes its true form, and jerks out its cartilaginous pro- boscis to its full proportions, changing in a moment its size from half an inch to as many as four or five inches. Then it will as suddenly withdraw its trunk within its body, the puzzle to the spectator being as to where it con- trives to pack it, especially as on anatomical examination we find a fair supply of digestive, circulating, and other apparatus already stowed inside. It is of a bluish-white or pinkish colour, the body being finely striated longi- tudinally with distant strise, which are crossed by others, hut the reticulations are not so evident about the centre. The proboscis, which swells out towards its extremity, is striated only in one direction, namely, longitudinally. The body is truncate posteriorly, and shaped like the mouth of a trumpet, out of which comes the long white pyramidal tail, composed of a number of hollow filiform processes, whirled round a common axis, each circle di- minishing in size towards the extremity. We find the anus opening at the extremity of this remarkable appen- dage, which Sars regards as an organ of respiration. A microscopic examination of this singular appendage in the living animal is most desirable, as it possibly may be furnished with some singular ciliary apparatus. The intestinal canal is simple, and on the abdominal surface a white line is seen running along the centre, which is com- posed of vessels and nerves. 258 PRIAPULACEiE. The Priapulus was first observed on the British shores by Dr. Fleming, who found it in the Zetland seas in 1810, and his specimen was no less than six inches long. Mr. Goodsir and I found it in the same locality in 1839 ; we dredged it in seven fathoms water, among Laminarise, in the Sound of Bressay, opposite Lerwick. Our specimen was three inches and a half in length. Dr. Coldstream has taken it in two localities very distant from each other, namely, Leith, and the coast of Devon. Captain Portlock has added it to the Irish fauna ; he dredged it in Belfast Bay. Abroad it inhabits the seas of Norway and of Greenland. The vignette represents the entrance to the Kyles of Bute. GAERTNER S SPOON- WORM. 259 SIP U N CU LIDJE, THALASSEMA CEJE. Genus Thalassema . Cuvier. Generic Character. — Body cylindrical, posterior extremity smooth ; proboscis retractile, short, without tentacula, and furnished at one side with a long fleshy furrowed simple sheath or appendage, which is not retractile. GAERTNER’S SPOON- WORM. Thalassema Neptuni. Gaer trier. Specific Character. — Body purplish anteriorly, gray posteriorly; appendage saffron. Lumbricus Thalassema , Pallas, Spicel. Zool. fasc. x. p. 8, t. i. f. 6. Gmelin, Syst. p. 3084. Thalassema rupium , Lamarck, Syst. (1801) p. 329. Tlialassina mutatoria , Montagu, Lin. Trans, vol. XI. p. 24, t. v. f. 2. Among the many contributions sent from England by Gaertner to Pallas was the singular worm-like Echinoderm before us. Its sagacious discoverer evidently saw the neces- sity of constituting a genus for its reception ; and though he does not appear to have defined it, he gave the name 260 THALASSEMACEJE. by which the creature is here designated. Cuvier and Montagu followed up the views indicated by Gaertner, and to the great zoologist of Devon is due the credit of first perceiving the true relations of the Thalassemaceae ; for, speaking of this worm, he says, “ I think it might with propriety immediately precede Holothuria.” Cuvier afterwards held the same view of its position, and Brandt has followed him. Lamarck, Blainville, and others, asso- ciated the Spoon-worms with the true Annelida. After having studied both the British species, in conjunction with Mr. Goodsir, both zoologically and anatomically, and observed one of them under most favourable circum- stances alive, I hold them to be structurally Radiata, and their relation with the worms to be a relation of analogy. Montagu considered Gaertner’s animal, as figured by Pallas, to be identical with his own, but badly represented. The figure given by Pallas, however, is not a bad one, but very characteristic of the creature when preserved in spirits, as may be seen on comparing it with my drawing, which I made from a preserved specimen taken by Mr. Harvey at Teignmouth, kindly communicated by Mr. Waterhouse. As Montagu observed the creature alive, I prefer giving his account of it, and then adding what information I have gathered additional from an examination of the dead ani- mal. He tells us it is “ ovate-oblong in a quiescent state, and rather more than half an inch in length, but sometimes extends to more than an inch, and then changes its form by alternately inflating each end. It is furnished with annulations, which become ridged at the posterior end, where it terminates in a point or nipple ; it has also longi- tudinal striae that decussate the annulations, giving it a squamous appearance. At the anterior end the margin of GAERTNER S SPOON- WORM. 261 the aperture extends into a very long amorphous appen- dage, frequently three or four times the length of the body, at other times contracted very short, but never receding within the mouth : in the former state it is usually flat, in the latter the sides fold together and almost form a tube, becoming much scalloped or wrinkled at the margin, and at the base the sides unite forming a sort of funnel to the mouth; by this implement not only nourishment is collected but its only progressive motion is performed. It is in continual action, thrown about in all directions in search of food, and occasionally by fastening it to a distant body the animal is drawn forward or turned to either side. At the anterior end immediately behind the long appen- dage are two very minute feelers, which are not always protruded. The posterior half of the body is of a bluish gray, the other purplish pink ; the appendage saffron, paler at the extremity. This curious animal was kept alive in sea-water several days for examination, and was never ob- served to take in or eject that element like the Holothuria tribe, but at the posterior end is an evident opening for the discharge of the faeces.” In this characteristic description of Montagu no men- tion is made of a trunk ; but in both this animal and the next there is a retractile proboscis resembling that of a Sipunculus, but unprovided with tentacula at the extre- mity. The singular spoon-shaped appendage of the mouth would seem to be a sheath for the proboscis, and a means of bringing the food of the creature within its reach. The internal anatomy nearly resembles that of the Echiurus, but the intestinal canal is not so long. Hitherto this animal has been found only on the coasts of Devon and Cornwall. Gaertner and Montagu describe it as living among submarine rocks. 262 THALASSEMACEJ3. The vignette is a copy of Montagu’s figure. Any one who has seen the extraordinary changes of form presented by animals of this tribe when alive, will not he surprised at the difference between it and my drawing. COMMON SPOON-WORM. 263 Genus Echiurus. Cuvier. Generic Character. — Body cylindrical, posterior extremity with circles of corne- ous bristles ; proboscis retractile, short, and furnished at one side with a long- fleshy furrowed simple non-retractile appendage. COMMON SPOON-WORM. Echiurus vulgaris. Savigny. Specific Character. — Body pink, ringed with minute pale granular spots ; ap- pendage scarlet. Lumbricus echiurus , Pallas, Spicel. Zool. f. 10, t. i. fig. 1-5. Lumbricus oxyurus , Pallas, Miscel. Zool. p. 146, t. xi. fig. 1-6. Thalassema echiurus , Lamarck, Anim. sans Vert. 1 Edit. vol. V. p. 300 ; 2 Edit. vol. V. p. 533. Blainville, Diet, des Sc. Nat, t. lvii. p. 499. Thalassema aquatica , Leach, Enc. Brit. Sup. t. i. p. 451. Thalassema vulgaris , Savigny, Syst, des Anim. sans Vert. p. 102. One day during the winter of 1840, when walking on the sandy shore at St. Andrew’s, seeking for such living treasures as the sea might have thrown up after a terrific storm, I found among a profusion of Heart-Urchins, Rasor- 264 THALASSEMACE.E. fish, Zoophytes, and other dwellers in the deep, a number of the curious worms I am about to describe. They were twisting about on the wet sand with many symptoms or discomfort, and near them lay as many curious fleshy red bodies, which seemed alive, and to be independent animals. They were not so, however, but were the broken-off appen- dages or sheaths to the creature’s proboscis, by means of which probably the Spoon-worm makes its way through the sand in which it lives, or perhaps folding- it into a funnel, thereby secures a supply of water when buried deep beneath the surface. From the marrow-spoon shape of the sheaths I have given the worms an English appel- lation. The Echiurus was first described by Pallas, and his account has furnished the materials for all the descriptions published since his time. He obtained it from the coast of Belgium, where he says it lives buried in the sand, and is used as a bait by the fishermen. The largest specimens I examined measured six inches in length, and half an inch in diameter. Their bodies were cylindrical, of a bright rose colour, and annulated with little tubercles, which were paler than the ground colour. The oral end is furnished with a proboscis about half an inch in length, having a red margin at its extremity, but no tentacula. This proboscis is retractile, hut not so the singular long extensile homogeneous sheath or spoon of a scarlet colour fixed on one side its base. This appendage is so slightly fixed that it breaks away on the slightest touch. A little way from its junction with the body are two shining lustrous cartilaginous horns or antennae, short, lanceolate, acuminate, curved, and retractile, their colour being golden yellow. These are the genital hooks. From between these proceeded a red line, indicating the course COMMON SPOON- WORM. 265 of an internal blood-vessel to the anus, which is placed at the posterior extremity, and surrounded by two circles of ten similar but shorter bristles. The skin near the vent is longitudinally striated. On dissection we find a long and winding' intestine of a brownish hue. There is a dorsal vessel running the length of the animal, containing red blood, the globules of which are large and irregular in form. The bristles near the head are retracted by powerful muscles. Near them open four genital sacs, two on each side. In these were detected spermatic animalcules. These sacs are transparent, and tipped with orange. On each side of the anus are two tubular sacs, each about three-fourths of an inch in length. These are the organs of respiration. When a portion of one of them is placed under the microscope alive in sea- water, a most beautiful organization is presented. They are seen to be studded with cup-shaped bodies, like polypes in form, round the margin of each of which is a circle of vibratory cilia, so large that they may be easily seen with a common lens of three-fourths of an inch focus. On the internal surface of the respiratory sacs instead of cups there are little tubercles corresponding to the cups, and covered like them with vibratile cilia, the whole forming one of the most beautiful arrangements of those singular organs seen in the animal kingdom. This arrangement has, as far as I am aware, not been noticed hitherto. It is represented in the vignette. The Spoon- worms were continually changing form, filling themselves with water, perhaps through the medium of the respiratory tubes. When supplied with fresh water they would swim in a revolving manner like a worm with great vivacity, and afterwards rest at the bottom of the vessel and swell themselves out. 266 THALASSEMACEyE. With this notice of an animal in which the cha- racteristic features of the Radiate type are almost obliterated, I conclude my account of the British Echi- nodermata. Among them we have seen some of the most extraordinary forms in the animal kingdom, some of the most wonderful struc- tures and of the strangest habits. Much yet remains to be done towards their elucidation, and the investigation of them both structurally and formally presents a wide field of inquiry to the student of Nature, as yet but imperfectly explored. The great naturalist of Denmark, Muller, long ago said that we need not resort to distant regions and foreign climes for rare or wonderful creatures ; that the fields, the woods, the streams, and the seas of our native lands abounded in wondrous evidences of God’s power and wisdom. The investigation of our native animals must ever be a chief source of sound zoological know- ledge, for it is there only we can watch, under favourable circumstances, for the observation of their developement, their habits, and their characters. The naturalist whose acquaintance is confined to preserved specimens in a cabi- net, can form but a vague idea of the glorious variety of Nature, of the wisdom displayed in the building up of the atoms of matter to be the houses of life and intellect. And unless we study the creatures living around us, how can we gain that delightful knowledge ? The passing note of an animal observed during travel is an addition to COMMON SPOON- WORM. 267 science not to be scorned ; the briefly characterizing of a new species from a preserved specimen, if done with judgment, is of importance ; but the real progress of natural history must ever depend on the detailed ex- amination of the beings gathered around us by the laws of geographical distribution, living and multiplying in their destined homes and habitats. LATIN INDEX. Amphidotus cordatus roseus Asteriadae Asterias aurantiaca Asterina gibbosa Astrophyton scutatum . Brissus lyrifer Chirodota digitata Cidaris papillata Comatula rosacea Cribella oculata rosea Crinoideae Cucumaria frondosa communis ■ • Drummondii fucicola . fusiformis hyalina . Hyndmanni pentactes Echinarachnius. placenta Ecbinidae Ecbinocyamus pusillus Echinus Flemingii . lividus miliaris neglectus • sphaera Echiurus vulgaris Goniaster equestris Templetoni Holothuriadae Luidia fragillissima Page Ocnus brunneus 229 lacteus 231 Ophiocoma Ballii 35 bellis 53 brachiata 45 filiformis 40 Goodsiri 57 granulata ; 50 minuta . 65 neglecta 30 punctata 37 rosula 60 Ophiura texturata 22 albida 27 Ophiuridae 19 Palmipes membranaceus 116 Priapulus caudatus 256 Psolinus brevis 207 P solus phantapus 203 Sipunculidae 243 Sipunculus Bernhardus 251 Johnstoni 254 Spatangus purpureus 182 Solaster endeca . 109 papposa 112 Syrinx Harveii . 249 nudus 245 papillosus 247 Thalassema Neptuni 259 Thyone papillosa . 233 Portlockii . 238 Uraster glacialis . 78 hispida 95 rubens 83 violacea 91 Page 190 194 71 130 119 67 187 239 146 5 100 106 1 209 217 223 227 219 221 225 213 178 141 175 164 167 161 172 149 263 125 122 197 135 ENGLISH INDEX Page Page Angular Sea- Cucumber • 213 Knotty Cushion-star 125 Ball’s Brittle-star . 35 Lesser Sand-star 27 Bird’s-foot Sea-star 116 Lingthorn . 135 Brown Sea-Girkin . 229 Little Crossfish 95 Butthorn 130 Long-armed Brittle-star 45 Long Sea-Cucumber 219 Cake-Urchin 178 Cirrhigrade Echinodermata 71 Mermaid’s Head 190 Cirrho-spinigrade Echinodermata 141 Milk-white Sea-Girkin 231 Cirrho-vermigrade Echinodermata 197 Montagu’s Chirodota . 239 Common Brittle-star 60 Crossfish 83 Papillated Syrinx 247 Egg- Urchin 149 Pinnigrade Echinodermata 1 Heart- Urchin 190 Piper .... 146 Sand- star 22 Purple Egg-Urchin 167 Sea- Cucumber 217 Heart-Urchin 182 Spoon-worm . . 263 Sun- star 109 ■ Sun-star 112 tipped Egg-Urchin 161 Thyone 233 Rosy Cribella 106 Daisy Brittle-star 53 Feather-star 5 Dotted . 37 Heart-Urchin 194 Drummond’s Sea-Cucumber 223 Rough Syrinx 245 Eyed Cribella m 100 Sand Brittle- star . 65 Sca'ad Man’s-head . 149 Fiddle Heart-Urchin 187 Sea-egg ib. Fleming’s Egg-Urchin . 164 Shell-bearing Sipunculus . 251 Shetland Argus . 67 Gaertner’s Spoon-worm . 259 Short Psolinus 207 Gibbous Starlet 119 Silky-spined Egg-Urchin 172 Glassy Sea-Cucumber 221 Snail Sea-Cucumber 203 Goodsir’s Brittle-star . 57 Spinigrade Echinodermata 19 Granulated 50 Spiny Crossfish 78 Gray . 30 Great Sea-Cucumber 209 Tailed Priapulus 256 Green Pea-Urchin 175 Tangle 227 Templeton’s Cushion-star . 122 Harvey’s Syrinx 249 Thread-rayed Brittle-star 40 Hyndman’s Sea- Cucumber 225 Violet Crossfish 91 Johnston’s Sipunculus • 254 Vermigrade Echinodermata 243 ERRATA. Page 29, line 14, for 66 valuable” read “ variable.” „ 46, ,, 15, for “ was ” read “ were.” „ 50, 60, and 79, among synonyms, for “ Metr.” read “ Meth.” „ 70, line 6, for “ oval ” read M oral.” ,, 73, last line, for “ Micheli ” read “ Meckel.” ,, 106, add to synonyms of “ Cribella rosea ” “ Linkia rosea , Thompson, An. Nat. Hist. No.xxxi. June, 1840. „ 224, line 2, /or “ two” read “ ten.” LONDON : PRINTED BY SAMUEL BENTLEY, Bangor House, Shoe Lane. RAMBLES OF A NATURALIST IN FOREIGN LANDS. BY EDWARD FORBES, M.W. S. For. Sec. B. S. etc. Although founded on a series of Natural History Ex- cursions and Studies in Scandinavia, France, Germany, Switzerland, Illyria, and the North of Africa, this Volume is not intended to be a mere book of Travels. It is written with the view of recording the impressions of a British Naturalist when amongst foreign scenes, the comparison of the aspect and productions of his own with those of other countries, and the philosophical speculations which such comparisons originate. The wanderings of the Student will not, however, be altogether cast aside, nor the story of adventure be passed over untold. Naturalizing is an ex- citing pursuit, and not always easy journeying ; the objects of the Zoologist, the Botanist, and the Geologist leading them out of the trodden paths of travel. Accidental par- ticipation in Natural History excursions has converted many an idler into a man of science. In the hope of adding to the number of such beneficial conversions, and of tempting closet philosophers out of their hiding-places into the fields, these records of the tramps of a Student in search of science are sent forth, ornamented with occa- sional sketches of the scenery and objects of his rambles. ILLUSTRATED WORKS PREPARING FOR PUBLICATION. A HISTORY OF BRITISH FOREST TREES, by P. J. Selby, F.R.S.E. THE HERALDRY OF FISH, by Thomas Moule, A MANUAL OF BRITISH SEA-WEED, by the Hon. W. H. Harvey. A GRAMMAR OF ENTOMOLOGY, by Edward Newman, F.L.S. a New Edition, almost entirely re-written. A HISTORY OF BRITISH CRUSTACEA, by Thomas Bell, F.R.S. A HISTORY OF THE FISHES OF MADEIRA, by the Rev. R. T. Lowe. DOCUMENTS CONNECTED WITH THE HISTORY OF LUDLOW, AND THE LORDS MARCHERS, edited by the Hon. R. H. Clive. A WINTER AT THE AZORES, AND A SUMMER AT THE BATHS OF THE FURNAS, by Joseph Bullar, M.D., and Henry Bullar of Lincoln’s Inn. ILLUSTRATIONS OF ARTS AND MANUFACTURES, by Arthur Aikin, F.L.S. THE VICAR OF WAKEFIELD, with Thirty-two Designs, by William Mulready, R.A. ELEMENTS OF PRACTICAL KNOWLEDGE, a New Edition. MR. YARRELL’S HISTORY OF BRITISH FISHES, a New Edition. JOHN VAN VOORST, 1, PATERNOSTER ROW.