n 1.. .-i«^ HARVARD UNIVERSITY. LIBRARY MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY xXa'^ ai,i-:xandp:r agassiz. ^^..^'^A^^^. SCANDINAVIAN FISHES SECOxXD EDITION SMITT. SOANDIXAVlAxX F18HES A HISTORY OF SCANDINAVIAN FISHES B. FRIES, C. U. EKSTROM, AND i\ SUNDEVALL WITH COLOURED PLATES W. VON AVEIGHT AND TEXT ILLUSTRATIONS SECOND EDITION REVISED AND COMPLETED BY Professor F. A. SMITT MEMBER OF THE ROYAL SWEDISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCE TEXT PART II P. A. NORSTEDT & S6NER STOCKHOLM BEIILIN LONDON PARIS FKIEDLAXDER & SOHN SAMPSON LOW, MARSTOX & COilPAXY. Limited LIBRAIKIE (\ REIXWALD & C" Carlstrasse 11 St. Dunstan's House, Fetter Laxe is, ri'e des SAi.xTs-PfiREs STOCKHOLM 1895 p. A. N 0 R S T E U T & S 0 N E R ROYAL PKINTINfi OFFICE CONTENTS. Ordo: PISCES Tf:LE()STKl (continued). Subordn: Teleostei Physoclysti (continued). Phalanx: Physoclysti Eleutherognathi (continued). Cohois: Eleutherognathi Malacopterygii (continued). Series: Ouomorphi (continued). FaiLiilia: Aiiimodi/tida- V^^- 5()7. MacrwuUe 580. VphidikUe > 594. Lycodidci » 602. Phalanx: Physoclysti Plectognathi > 618. Series: Gymiiodontes _.-. - .. 622. Familia: Ortliw/on'scidfe 622. Series: Scleroderini » 631. Familia: Balistidce » 631. Phalanx: Physoclysti Hemibranchii > 635. Familia: Gnstevoslehla' » 637. Phalanx: Physoclysti Lophobranchii.. 661. Familia: fi^i/injitiitliida > 663. Subordo: Teleostei Physostomi > 68it. Series: GUinomorplii * 690. Familia: iSiluridtv » 692. Series: Ci/prijwmoi-plii > 702. Familia: Vobitida > 703. >' Oyprinidce > 714. Series: Tkriggomorpld » 826. Familia: Salmonidx > 827. > Scopelidir « 920. » Clupeida' > 946. Series: Esocifurines 1. Lycomorpdn P^g- 997. Familia: Esocidw > 997. Series: Encheb/morphi » 1011. Familia: Anguillidic » 1022. Ordo: PISCES CHOXDROSTEl 1043. Familia: Acipenseridie 1044. Ordo: PISCES ELASMOBRANCHII.... 10(13. Subordo: ElasmobrancMi Holocephali. 107«. Familia: Chima-rkhc 1078. Subordo: Elasmobranchii Plagiostomi . 10«5. Phalanx: Plagiostomi Batoidei » 1086. Familia: MyUobalida; ,> 1093. Tfnyoiudcc » 1096. Bajidir.. 1100. Phalanx: Plagiostomi Selachoidei... > 1127. Series: Asterospond yli >, 1128. Familia: OarchariidcE. > 1128. » LanmidtE 1135. > iSci/lliidce . 1147. Series: Cyclospondyli 115(1. Familia: Spinacida 11.57. Ordo: PISCES CYCLOSTOMl ... 1172. Familia: Petromy zonida: ■> 1172. > Mt/xinidce... >• 1195. Ordo: PISCES LEPTOCARDII 1210. Familia: Amphio.ridce > 1211. ■SAND-r.EI.S. 567 I AM. AMMODYTIDiE. Body elovgated. fusiform, terete or compressed, covered with thin cycloid scales or partly naked. Caudal fin separated from the other vertical fins. Jaws without teeth". Gill-openings large: hranrhiostegal memhranes more or less completely free from each other and from the isthmus. I'seudohraiichia' irell-developed and distinct. Air-bladder iraidiiig. Pyloric appoidages rudimeutary. The place of this family in tlie svsteiu has long lieen a debated question. The original oi)ini()ii of mo- dern systematists, that of Aktedi, was that the Sand- Eels — with their long dorsal tin occupying the greater })art of the back — should lie ranged beside the genus Coryphmni. This opinion, borne out bv the Mackerel- like coloration of tlie Sand-Eels, still survived in 1839 in Swain.son', wiio pointed out the external resemblances between these fishes and Lepidopus. Linn.eus had ima- gined that he had made an improvement by uniting all tishes witliuut ventral tins into an order (Apodes), and thus in 1817 — 1821) the Sand-Eels assumed in Cuvier's works'' the rank of a genus within the family of the Eels, and in 1832—1841, in Bonaparte'', that of a subfamily {Ammodytini) of the Ophidiido' among Malacopterygii apodes. When iltLLER" formed the order Anacanthini, he did not hesitate to include in this or- der the familv Ophidiidec, but he declared himself unable to give a decided opinion as to the place of Ammodytes, though he positively denied the relationship between this genus and the Eels. In his later work', however, Bonaparte ranged the Sand-Eels, as a distinct family {Ammodytid(e), among the Gadi, and Glnther' did not hesitate to include these tishes among the Anacanthini as a subfamily (Animodytina) of tlie Opl/i- diidce. This diversity of opinion has been caused by the absence in the Sand-Eels both of the ventral tins and the air-bladder. The reduction and eventual disappearance of the ventral tins is a characteristic -which, as we have seen above, may occur within several piscine orders. The absence of the air-bladder may be explained in the same wa}'. We must, therefore, look to other characters in order to discover the nearest relations of the family, and as often happens in such cases, we may have recourse to ciiaracters apparently of minor im- portance. The Sand-Eels are approximated bj* their form and coloration not only to the Mackerels but, still more closelj', to the Garpikes. To the latter fishes, which are Pharyngognate Anacanthini, it is impossible to unite the Sand-Eels, in which the lower pharyngeals are free from each other. Still, where the lateral line lies in the Garpikes and Flying-tishes, along the ventral margin, at the lioundary between the sides and the belly, and also along the base of the anal tin, here we find in the Sand-Eels a dermal ridge, somewhat raised in the same way. The physiological signification of this ridge is indeed unknown, Init in a morphological respect it shows at least a trace of resemblance to the Garpikes and Flying-fishes, such a resemblance as we have seen above in other Anacanthi)ii, in the Coiichia- stage of Onos. The Garpike-like coloration of these last fishes, in its sharp contrast to that of adult Rock- lings, may also be a trace of their original I'elationship to the Sand-Eels. Among the osteological peculiarities which we have above remarked in the Gadoid family, " Day (Fishes of India, p. 420) observed, Ijowever. ''a few, fine teeth opposite tljo synipliysis in eitlier jaw" leria) katlolepis. ' yat. Hist. Fish., ,i,„j,h., Repl., vol. II, p. ihi. ■= Rer/iie Animal, tome II, ed. 1, p. 240; cd. 2, p. 3G0. '' Iconogr. Fn. Ital., toni. Ill, Pesci, Introd., p. 15. ' Abh. Aknd. Wiss. Berl. 1844, p. 177. •'' Cataloijo Metoilico dei Pesci Europei, Xapoli 1846, pp. G and 40. » Cat. Brit. Mas., Fish, vol. IV, p. 384. Ammodytes (Blee- Scandinarinn FMie. 568 .SCANDINAVIAN FISHES. there recurs in tlie Sanrl-l'lels the chjiracteristic, lo1)ate process on the intennaxinary bones, though it is re- raoved farther forward, to nliout the end of the first third {Ammodytes tobianus) or fourth {Am. hniceolatits) of the length of the bones. This resemblance maj' be not without importance in a morphological respect. With this exception, however, the intermaxillarj- bones of the Sand-Eels are very unlike those of the Codtishes, not only in their narrow and terete, almost needle-like shape, but also in the more or less complete freedom of the nasal processes, which vary considerably in length and mobility, and are united to the anterior end of the bones only by cartilage and ligaments. Tlie ske- leton of the Sand-Eels is also distinguished from that of the Codfishes in two other essential respects. Ribs are attached to the abdominal vertebra? from the very first of these bones; and in the caudal fin, which is far more differentiated than in the Codfishes, and the base of which is composed exclusively of the last two ver- tebra and the urostyle, the develojiment of tlie hypural bones is quite as typical as in the rest of the Teleosts. Still, though we may find in the above-mentioned points of resemblance to the Codfislies and the Gar- pikes fully valid reasons of morphological significance for the opinion advanced l»y GCntiier and other mo- dern writers, that the Sand-Eels are Anacanthine fishes, we are not destitute of grounds for a- close comparison of these fishes with the Eels, though the latter are assigned to a far distant place in the system by the arrangement of the jaws and shoulder-girdle, as well as by their character of Physostomous fishes. This comparison is suggested by the scales. Their structure most strongly reminds us partly of tlie Eels and partly of Enclielyopus. In the Scandinavian Sand-Eels, as in most fishes, and in a manner that especially calls to mind the simple scales of our common Flatfislies, the anterior part of the scale is quite different from the posterior; l)ut here the difference is so marked that the former rescinl)les in structure an entire scale of EncJie- lijojiKS, with dense, concentric stria?, interrupted by grooves radiating from the nucleus, while the latter resembles the scales of the Eels, with continuous con- centric stria% l)ut with tlie grooves broken up into more or less irregular, round or oblong, small patches. On the anterior part of the scale too, the concentric strite are about twice as dense (numerous) as on the posterior part. The scales of tlie Sand-Eels also vary considerably in form and development, not only in different species but even in the same fish. All of them are compai'utively small and tliin. Tlie most developed are set on the Itack of the fish, the largest of them, as usual, on the hind part of the body. These scales are imbricated, with the posterior part free; and they vary in shape from rounded to oblong or lingui- form. ( )n the sides of the body the scales lie in der- mal folds that run in an oblique transverse direction downward and Ijackward from the lateral line proper, which is situated high on the back, to the raised dermal ridge that coasts each side of the belly, forming a boundary between the latter and the sides of the liody. On the belly itself, between these dermal ridges, the folds are less sharply marked, but the scattered (not imbricated) scales lie hidden in the skin, in ro\vs that rfln from each dermal ridge obliquelv forward and in- ward, towards a similar but lower dermal ridge at the middle of the belly. The scales which lie in the skin are of a broad oval (linguiform) shape, with the hind extremity pointed". In their manner of life the Sand-Eels remind us both of the Garpikes and of the Eels: in the open sea they are active and eager in their pursuit of small fishes and fry, but now and then they hide themselves in the sand to escape their numerous enemies, just as the Eels burrow in the sand and mud or creep into crevices between the stones. The fainilv contains remarkablv few forms: among the 4 or 5 known species'' only two genera can with reason be distinguished, ilost of the species belong to the Northern Hemisphere, both to the Atlantic and the Pacific; but one species occurs in the Indian Ocean. " In tlie Indian species, wliicli Gl'nther lias ailoptcd as the type of a dislinet genus (Bleekeiia), the scales are said to be larger (of moderate size), and the said dermal ridges are wanting. ' Five distinct species have been described from .'iinerica. But the Greenland species is undoubtedly identical with our Sand-Launce, and Jordan and Gilbert (Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 10, ]ip. 414 and 009), who have rejected one species ns b.ised merely on a description of a damaged specimen, advance the opinion that all the others are hardly more than varieties of the Sand-Launce. Brown-Goode, however {Fisher., Fislier. Industr. U. S., sect. I, p. 244), insists upon maintaining a rigid distinction between the European and American Sand-Eels. !SAND-r,E[..S. 569 (iKMs AMMODYTES. B(i(hi more or less terete (out// sti/ihtlij compressed). A Juii/iitndUud dermal ridge ov each side of fite belt//. BranchiostegaJ rags 7 or s. Tlie cxtreiuely similar s|)Cfies that tbrin this genus, have long l)cen i