ani ve-6 A Mone ese i, i | | : . : : | | ie ‘3 hagas) Tana ; hea sayy 78 Pee: Paes Pe own Oe telgnas ine Be: bonttliments of J. M. RUSK, Secieluiy g , Ayuiiulldle LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. Ciep. PONE Holt FT EYIo PRESENTED BY_ | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Be tes ee PARIT MENT OF AGRICULTURE. iia ae poet om mae jor LU A 1) ! \ HOG CHOLERA: ITS HISTORY, NATURE, AND TREATMENT, AS DETERMINED BY THE INQUIRIES AND INVESTIGATIONS Vv s yd OF a ar THE BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY. 0 <> 8 Se WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1889. : 15612 H c——1 _Se}ey A \ Sts.’ TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. INTRODUCTION AND SPREAD OF HOG CHOLERA IN THE UNITED STATES ......- 9 EWE SMEATION ORNS WINE DISASUS: .ccc.-c.cs cas. ccccec case mceves sauces ace 14 SYMPTOMS AND POST-MORTEM APPEARANCES IN HoG CHOLERA..--...--- Boa ap “esions produced by hog cholera ...-.-- si eaterai Pae(ceintels aeVaistle aa/eeie Sa tance oS 34 (a) Acute type.----. olan aatteeate SO OO eee Seah seee cece e 3 (b) Chronic forms...-.- 3 ASO DED ORR BoD Oe SOB AR ES mee eens i ete 335, HIsToRY AND AUTOPSY NOTES OF AN OUTBREAK OF HoG CHOLFRA......--- 37) DISEASE IN HEALTHY PIGS CAUSED BY MATERIAL FROM THIS EPIZOOTIC.-.- 50 BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE IMPORTANT FEATURES OF THIS EPIZOOTIC ....---- 52 Eien MEMO LOSTONG =e aaietee steals isle accel snoe sa enem a Sceeons etadientes 4 52 WileeRaLimepleSiONSes foc caSewe clase see cased OSS IAS OAD Ses Be 6 Bassoon Be 53 Complications -....-- Se ee 9 SRC EES ET RISERS Oe aE OR one irae nen eae 54 PMMOPLOSIOHS = oe Saccce ceceeaeme 5: i Paar ae Biss Moree eee Oe ale seer 54 EACPURTOLOGTICAT, OBSERVATIONS Sars = 2s s220 seas cices a. ccicemnee ieerteic Sac. 5} iin CAUSATION OR: ETIOLOGY OF HOG CHOLBRA! ..-<..<- (ESTES TENE NENG Lee ece ee eR IRE SS So a ee ee eee 91 3 4 ORDINARY LIME AS A DISINFECTANT FOR HoG CHOLERa ...---. .-- Peshotee DISINFECTION OF THE SOIL WITH LIME ...----.- Sree Laake aa as 1 A Is THERE ANY RESISTANT SPORE STATE IN THE Lire HISTORY OF THE Ba- CIETUS ON SHOGMCHOLERA .ene er eee eee SorMeeCSnGoas WAYS IN WHICH SWINE BECOME INFECTED. ....---.-.---- eS Sisco ane Soe J By way of the digestive tract ..............-- S Snes eee See ee ewes a. Feeding diseased viscera... -. Sa Re Sees Gee eee Saks mis Janene b. Feeding pure culture of Hog Cholera bacilli. -.........-......--- an Subcutaneousnocwlation =. ese. ee se. sess oho ic ee = Se eee ae Se Intra-venous inoculation ..5.25...--. ..- Ee ee ons Se ae A Goods Imfectious by: way ot theslino st ssee sere eeiee eee eb cee met oo eee SoME OBSERVATIONS ON THE PATHOLOGICAL ACTION oF HoG CHOLERA BaAc- THRDA ct cc o Hess aes cee eee eee ees e Sete RE SSE Oe eee ee eee is BACTERIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF HOG CHOLERA 1N NEBRASKA, ILLI- NOUS ANID MUAVREN A AGNGD reer teetare po mtoasocs eseceal ds dysiets BE en ier seme DIFFERENTIAL CHARACTERS OF THE HoG CHOLERA BACILLUS -..-.....---<.< Bacillus frome@Nebraska. soe. o weseence sss hee see eerie ee cee eee wuldaes cates Bacillus from Wlimois: <4cs. cote ones sctacee wines seca tas eme Reece ee eee eee Bacillus from Maryland......- agaiciewmlaps Bem atlas cid teerate sie mns ete ete Ie eee eer RELATION OF HOG CHOLERA TO. TH PUBLIC EmALEH <=. er eee eee eae 2 PREVENTION OF HoG CHOLERA -....-. -=-------+------.--- wart 2 shiec eee eee is ISOLATION, DISINFECTION, AND CLEANLINESS AS PREVENTIVE MEASURES.... TROAEMENT ORE OG CHORMRA Ss ceercee ies cen coe ee been eee eases See 3 EXPERIMENTS ON THE PREVENTION OF HOG CHOLERA By INOCULATION ..-.. J. Inoculation of small doses of strong virus in the form of liquid culture... Il. The effect of feeding small quantities of cultures on immunity----.---- III. Injection of sterilized culture liquid to produce immunity-.------------ Tests with sterilized cultures on pigeons. ...- oxeceteeeeee Bi AG OS Tests with sterilized cultures on pigs .-...----------- Stinsis, s1oi> Syeie e : EXPERIMENTS ON THE ATTENUATION OF THE HoG CHOLERA BACILLI BY HEAT Hog CHOLERA OR DISEASES CLOSELY ALLIED TO IT IN OTHER COUNTRIES -. In Great Britain’ 2.2. BEE she ote ee hig and aes A ee pe te) eee ice atoee In Sweden and Denmark ..--- UF PR Ey Se Pee Pee = Oe te Occ 3 MUIR agiiee = os csc eediecccecivaice oe eae wion cc od sew eavdoees cee eee ILLUSTRATIONS. INVESTIGATION Or HoG CHOLERA: ae PuaTEs I, II, III, and IV. Illustrating necrosis and ulceration of the mu- cosa of the large intestine, more particularly the cecum ....-.-- 194 ive SHOWS Hleere mt Ghemilewy Poo 5 hss 2.02.2 cc cies. a's alaeatrs eee 194 Min showie hemorrhagic kidney. 525. Soha a -~ ol ; -r a5 a an) ae Ps oe es ee a hes es “3 — ao o iY sd ‘ 7 2 * ake = ; | ihe Saad A; ae ; + ; = - . ; 3 > ’ - Ps ts Pl has Sear Se Pe : Ae ie | Sige bal ae Ea - 7 Sree oe e ae burn rae y VES SS (od leet el ee at a ee ty Canes i 33 yt eereinS SHES ‘ : - < = 5 ~ . ig z ii z a” Tos, P Fis irs Sry 4 7 a a A + nll 4 hd t- aoe as) : ;: " & <> : oe ; oe a ‘2. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. WASHINGTON, D.C., January 18, 1889. Srr: I have the honor to submit herewith a report upon the history nature, and treatment of the disease known in the United States as hog cholera. Our knowledge of this pest has been developed almost entirely by the inquiries and experimental investigations of the Bureau of Animal Industry; and while much of the information contained in this volume has been published in the reports of the Department of Agriculture, a systematic and complete statement of the facts has never before been made in a connected manner. It has been discovered in the course of these investigations that there are two very different and distinct epizootic diseases of swine in this country which are widely prevalent, and which had previously been spoken of under the one name of hog cholera or swine plague. These two names had, therefore, been used synonymously previous to 1886, when the differences between the diseases were pointed out in the re- ports of this Bureau. It was then deemed best to apply the term hog cholera to that disease in which the intestines were found most af- fected, and in which the symptoms would come nearest to justifying the appellation. The other malady appeared identical, not only in symptoms and lesions but in the microbe which caused it, with the disease recently described in Germany by both Léffler and Schiitz un- der the name of Schweineseuche, or swine plague. For this reason it - was considered best to call this affection swine plague in the reports, and thus preserve uniformity and prevent confusion of ideas in refer- ence to the diseases of swine in different countries. This volume treats exclusively of hog cholera, as it is the malady which has been longest under investigation; but the material is on hand for an almost equally complete volume on swine plague, which we hope soon to submit for publication. There are, of course, many other dis- eases of swine, some of which are communicable in a certain degree, but none of which are so widespread and fatal as the two that have been named. Someof these, especially the parasitic ones, are receiving at- tention, and may in the future be treated at length in the bulletins of this Bureau. The greater part of the detailed study of the disease, the planning of experiments, and the bacteriological investigations have been carried 7 8 out by Dr. Theobald Smith, while the conducting of the experiments, the care of the experimental animals, and the general management of the experiment station have been under the direction of Dr. F. L. Kilborne. I can only speak in the highest terms of the untiring in- dustry and skill displayed by both of these gentlemen. The experiments in regard to prevention and medical treatment are being continued, but it is confidently believed that an understanding of the facts detailed in this volume will enable the owners of hogs to pre- vent or even arrest the great majority of outbreaks. It should be un- derstood, however, that the measures indicated must be enforced promptly, energetically, and thoroughly. D. E. SALMON, Chief of the Bureau of Animal Industry. Hon. NoRMAN J. COLMAN, Commissioner of Agriculture. THE INTRODUCTION AND SPREAD OF HOG CHOLERA IN THE UNITED STATES. In the early days of hog-raising in the United States these animals were comparatively free from disease, and wide-spread epizootic mala- dies among them appear to have been unknown. A circular letter of inquiry was recently sent from the Bureau of Animal Industry to the correspondents of the Department and to swine-breeders in all parts of the country, asking the date of the first appearance of hog cholera in the respondent’s county, and a statement as to the health of swine pre- vious to that time. More than a thousand replies have been received, many of them so carefully written as to be of much interest and value. Nearly all agree in stating that at one time the swine industry was not subject to the periodical losses from epizootics which now cause such discouraging losses. From the first appearance of this class of diseases the outbreaks became more numerous and more wide-spread until nearly all parts of the country are now subject to frequent invasions. The correspondence on this subject can only be briefly summarized in this bulletin. The first outbreak of disease supposed to be cholera that was referred to occurred in Ohio in 1833. It is reported from one county in South Carolina in 1837, and from one in Georgia as having existed in 1838. It existed in 1840 in one county in Alabama, one of Florida, one of Illinois, and one of Indiana. In 1843 it is reported from one county in North Carolina. In 1844 one county in New York re- ports being affected. Its presence in 1845 is only mentioned by one correspondeat from Kentucky. The thirteen years, from 1833 to 1845, inclusive, form a period in which but ten outbreaks of swine disease, supposed by the writers to have been hog cholera, were mentioned in these replies. It is evi- dent that during this period hogs were generally healthy throughout the country, and that the losses from disease were not sufficient to at- tract very much attention. The nature of the disease referred to as existing so long ago may, of course, be questioned at this day, and we have no means of deciding whether or not any particular outbreak was cholera or some non-contagious malady due to local conditions. It is reasonable to conclude, however, that the correspondents are correct in their opinion in most cases, because since 1845 the outbreaks mentioned became more numerous year by year until we find nearly the whole 9 10 country involved. This rapid increase of the number of affected sec- tions would seem to indicate that a contagious disease had been intro- duced and carried to widely separated sections of the country, from which it extended until, with a year favorable to its propagation, we find a sudden and alarming increase. Turning again to the number of outbreaks reported, we find, in 1846, that there were two in North Carolina, one in Georgia, one in Ilinois, one in Indiana, and one in Ohio. In 1847 four are given in Tennessee and one in Virginia. In 1848 we hear from it in one county in Ilinois, two in Indiana, two in Kentucky, one in North Carolina, and one in Virginia. In 1849 it is mentioned as in one county in Tees and in one county in Ohio. In 1850 we have accounts of three outbreaks in Georgia, one in Pennsylvania, one in Indiana, two in Kentucky, one in North Caro- lina one in Ohio, and two in Tennessee. In 1851 there were outbreaks in Ilinois, Indiana, and Tennessee. In 1852 there were two reported in Illinois, two in Indiana, one in Missouri, and one in Ohio. In 1853 it invaded two new counties in [linois, two in Indiana, two in Kentucky, one in North Carolina, four in Ohio, two in Tennessee, cne in Texas, and one in Virginia. In 1854 it appeared in one more county in Ili- nois, four in Indiana, five in Kentucky, two in North Carolina, two in Ohio, and one in Tennessee. In 1855 it is found in six counties in Ili- nois, five in Indiana, one in Kansas, four in Kentucky, one in Missouri, two in Tennessee, and one in Virginia. The number of outbreaks mentioned by correspondents, it will be seen, 1s not less than ninety-three for the ten years from 1846 to 1855 inclusive. As compared with the ten outbreaks reported for the pre- vious thirteen years this is an enormous increase. ‘There can be little doubt that it was during the period from 1846 to 1855 that hog cholera became scattered over the country and fairly began that work of ae struction which has become so familiar to us in later years. Below will be found a tabulated statement of the replies from nearly eight hundred and fifty of our correspondents. The figures show the number of original hog-cholera infections reported for the different pe- riods from the first recorded appearance of the disease in this country to 1887. Of course there have been many counties infected within that time which are not referred to in these communications, but the large number that were mentioned gives as perfect an idea as can now be obtained cf the development and spread of this contagion. It is to be remembered that the outbreaks mentioned are not secondary infections, but are the first outbreaks of the disease in the correspondent’s local. ity, andin most cases the first which occurred in his county. In nearly all cases it is stated that previous to the outbreak referred to the health of hogs had always been good, and the losses from disease had been confined as a rule to a single animal at a time. sal Number and dates of original infections with hog cholera and swine plague, as compiled JSrom recent correspondence. en Pe Ue ae] Sar loa ib Se hie a ge | 03 |S | ce | be | ce | SS | be | oe jee om ae ae Bet ot Sa Et en PARSING (a ke ance mem ccna Di poet erciars 4 7 TP Ras che 1 1 eee OAT DTG (SS oe te ae Eee 1 2 7 1 4 2 Qi hadiwtees CRUE ee Seis e ase afm = non] aes miei pnm net alas erie seme |ln ame mse|| = acic.cet| sm as oisina|-nnemiams a eee ans ME Re oe ae enn in| armle meters | ohm oe ~ 8 eee hints |p Eee aaIN amc cnisis ||P senate wit] s)e.cielerae 1 1 RERIMISUREO ha necator se sascime - a ciroiwioe| «cates 2 etslleeoetslm All ta Sete pauls Shainin ||-icisisia er liam acces 2 1 DLN S Sa te eee GS Os Se. cee ssdaecd Ae dheed pagscc ce teerkcosd larncerns Vices. 1 1 TAGS Ee eereeigaeetaee Pale tawcres lott cates Tike ae Ae 1 3 EDD sire eee PB OGD INE seme on decien <== 1 5 13 13 7 Ee petatan Mc 1 1 it eee 1 14 40 | 14 7 8 7 Tip| rerace 5 SARIN Si Naren aia lnminasio en <= ° 1 i9 26 8 10 5 4 BIAS Secs a SENS aie oe a Se ies o's 6 o' [vine ole mine Nacia clare ais 7 15 1l 11 V7 13 3 PRCERRGM See me ce cs oc ora See=|enielonccs 1 Di eymcatote ares iets note ‘DDI 12 26 6 PCGMiROKY) -is’ icine cide [aac ici Uae ets