UNIVERSITY OF IP ^mm ATURBA "PAIGN NOTICE: Return or renew all Library Materlalsl The Minimum Fee for each Lost Book is $50.00. The person charging this material is responsible for its reuirn to the library from which it was withdrawn on or before the Latest Date stamped below. Theft, mutilation, and underlining of books are reasons 'or discipli- ne^ kction and may result in dismissal from the University. To renew call Telephone Center, 333-8400 UNIVERSITY OF in INOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN ACES LIBRARY .9FP 1 8 ZU03 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/illinoisforestma3441univ /9f y-^^<^^ ^L^hn ces Cooperative Extension Service UnlverBrty of Bliooe al Urtiana-CliafTtpaign ACES , JUN I 6 2003 ILLINOIS '^^5*!!^E5Hvonu£,o,s FOREST MANAGEMENT A Biannual Newsletter for Illinois Landowners IN THIS ISSUE Pagel Farm Your Forest Page 11 Tree Measurement Tools Page 12 Tim's Tips: Reducing Down Time Pa^ 5el4 Illinois Timber Prices Karen Colbert Volume 1, 1998 No. 34 Illinois Forest Management Newsletter is produced by the University of Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences and the Cooperative Extension Service. Our newsletter features information from many sources to help you make informed decisions concerning your woodland resources. We encourage your questions and comments which we will share with our readers as space permits. Direct your inquiries to: Editor, IFM Newsletter, W-503 Turner Hall, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave. Urbana, IL 61801. The following article is reprinted from a University of Illinois Cooperative Extension Service publication entitled "Farm Your Forest" by Theodore W. Curtin. Information presented in the article has been revised to reflect changes since its original printing. Terms in bold face appear in the Glossary. FARM YOUR FOREST The basic unit of agriculture is the farm, but all too often, farmers do not include their woodland or marginal land areas as part of their total farm operation. Managing the forested areas of a farm should be equally important and integral to its operation as is the management of other crops. Unfortunately, wooded areas are often not managed, and landowners overlook important sources of income and much enjoyment. Besides providing basic information about the harvesting and marketing of timber products, this circular helps landovraers begin developing a plan for managing or farming their forest. Like farmers of other crops, those who farm a forest need a management plan to develop their forest to its greatest potential. An outline of a forest management plan suggested by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources is provided in Appendix A. Left unattended, a forest may revert to a jungle of weeds, brush, and trees of little value. It could become overgrown Illinois Forest Management Newsletter or understocked with trees that mature more slowly; the wildlife habitat of such a forest could degenerate; and its recreational values could decrease. It could also become more susceptible to disease, insects, fire, and other hazards. To be profitable, tree fanning, like the farming of other crops, may require special crop varieties, fertilizers, or improved harvesting techniques. The condition of a stand or continuous group of trees should dictate the allocation of time and resources. Tree planting may enhance an existing stand. Thinning and tree removal may be necessary to provide additional room for the remaining trees to grow and develop. Most important for the vigor, productivity, and profitability of a forest is cutting or harvesting at the appropriate time to prevent the waste of this valuable resource. These cultural practices are all part of good forest management. A degree of stewardship accompanies all land ownership. Nearly three-quarters of all commercial forestland in the United States is privately owned. These forests provide the fiber for our morning paper and cereal boxes as well as the wood for our furniture and homes. Because of this constant demand for forest products, a managed tract can afford an annual income or a growing bank account for emergencies. In addition to supplying traditional forest products, well managed forests make woodlands more attractive and healthy, increasing their recreational potential and their wildlife. Nature lovers, hikers, skiers, hunters, and others receive enjoyment from such forests. Because a well managed forest enhances this enjoyment, it increases the value of property and makes an estate more valuable for family and heirs. Pre- occupied with annual crops, some owners of forestland in Illinois have ignored the benefits of a good forest management plan. This lack of concern has greatly affected the productivity of their forestland and degraded scenery, recreation, and wildlife. Often the result of decades of past abuse, most forests today have developed without such a plan. In Illinois, tree growth has been only one-half to one third of its potential. This wasted potential growth is a significant economic loss for owners of forestland. private consulting foresters can help develop one. Offices located through out the state are listed in Appendix B. Objective of Forest Management Why does one own a forest? One frequent answer to this question is that the forest came with the farm. Whether bought or inherited, however, this resource need not be wasted if the owner of a forest first establishes goals to guide its comprehensive management. One basic consideration is the owner's need for immediate versus long-term income. Others include the time and resources that the owner has for management activities; the owner's interests in complementary benefits, such as hunting, wildlife, recreation, and soil conservation; and opportunities for diversified farm income with alternative forest related crops, such as Christmas trees, shiitake mushrooms, fuelwood, or biomass, a short-rotation, energy-producing crop. These considerations will limit and structure the management plan. Determining the Property Boundaries The first step in developing a management plan is to know its location and size. Obtaining this information is generally not a significant problem for Illinois landowners because most of the state is laid out in a grid system known as a rectangular survey. Its divisions are townships and sections. Townships are 6 miles square and have 36 sections, with each section containing about 640 acres. (However, incomplete townships also exist.) Aerial photographs and county plat books with accurately scaled diagrams showing boundaries and subdivisions are available at some libraries and many county agricultural offices and provide quick references for locating land areas and boundaries. Land fonns, old fences, and comers can often be identified with these references. In the absence of these idenfifiable features, it is sometimes necessary to hire a registered land surveyor to reconstruct them, particularly for determining boundary lines. Determining specific features of interior areas may not require the services of a surveyor. Understanding the many opportunities for profit and pleasure in Illinois forestry, however, should encourage those who own a forest in this state to develop a good forest management plan. District foresters in the Division of Forest Resources of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Getting a Visual Impression In addition to helping determine property boundaries, aerial photographs are useful for understanding the topography and other characteristics of a forest. Both ridge tops and wet Illinois Forest Management Newsletter >>5:15-10:15a.ni. Concurrent Session 1 I . "How to Grow Trees From Seed" I. "Chain Saw Maintenance & Chain Sharpening I. "How to Recognize Signs of Cultiirally-Significant Sites on Your Property" 1. "Interpreting Your Forest's Health" (2 hours, continued next session) ). "Forest Landowners and the Federal Income Tax" (2 hours, continued next session) ). "Inviting (Forest) Birds to Your Property" [0:30-11:30 a.m. Concurrent Session 2 ^ "Tree Identification Basics" I. 'Timber Sales, Contracts, and Logging Aesthetics" >. "Green Certification — What Does It Mean for Private Forest Landowners?" 0. "Interpreting Your Forest's Health (continued from Session 1 ) 1 . "Forest Landowners and the Federal Income Tax" (continued from Session 1 ) 2. "Forest Succession — How to Maintain the Forest You Want" [2:00 noon-1 :00 p.m. Concurrent Session 3 3. "Overview of Cost-Share Programs Available to Forest Landowners" 4. "Mechanics of Directional Felling (Outdoors) 5. "Riparian Buffers and Filter Strips — Common Sense Conservation" 6. "Exotic Plants — Coming to a Woodland Near You" 7. "Prescribed Burning in Private Woodlands — Why and How" 8. "Managing Damage From Woodland Wildlife" 1:10-2:15 p.m. Buffet Luncheon 2:25-3:25 p.m. Concurrent Session 4 1 9. "Controlling Soil and Gully Erosion on Your Property" 20. "How to Nurtiu-e and Abused Woodland" 2 1 . "Restoring Savanna on Your Property" (2 hours, continued next session) 22. "Winter Tree Identification" (2 hours, continued next session) 23. "Soils and Their Relationship to Tree Growth" 24. "The Forest is More Than Trees — A Natural Heritage Biologist's Perspective on Management Plan Development' 3:40-4:40 p.m. Concurrent Session 5 25. "Exotic Plants— Coming to a Woodland Near You" (repeat) 26. "Chain Saw Maintenance & Chain Sharpening (repeat) 27. "Restoring Savanna on Your Property" (continued from Session 4) 28. "Winter Tree Identification" (continued fi"om Session 4) 29. "Basics of Conifer Plantation Management" 30. "Woodland Mushroom Indentification" Yes, I would like to attend the 1999 Tri-State Forest Stewardship Conference (please check which one). I I Saturday, March 13, 1999 Sinsinawa Mound Conference Center, Sinsinawa WI I I Saturday, November 1 3, 1 999 Quincy Holiday Inn, Quincy, IL Please send me registration information Name: Address: City State Zip Return to: Judy Stoll, W-503 Turner Hall, 1 102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801; 217-333-3650 Illinois Forest Management Newsletter H Illinois Agricultural Slalislics Service P.O. Box 19283 Spnngfield, IL 62794-9283 Ph (217) 492-4295 US Department of Agriculture 18 ILLINOIS TIMBER PRICES DIVISION OF FOREST RESOURCES 600 Nonb Gnod Avenue West Spnogfield. Dlioou. 62706 Ptwoe (217)782-2361 NATURAL RESOURCES "ffi^:? ZONE PRICE REPORTING ZONES ZONE 1 December 1. 1998 PRICES PAID ILLINOIS TIMBER PRODUCERS MAY 1998 THROUGH AUGUST 1998 Winter sawtimber prices paid to Dlinois timber growers generally showed mixed trends for FOB. Mill and stumpage compared to both the previous winter and summer. Of the timber buyers reporting volume of their 1998 operation, 42% indicated their volume was 500 thousand board feel or more. This report is prepared by the Illinois Agricultural Statistics Service in cooperation with the Dlinois Division of Forest Resources. Unless otherwise indicated, pnces shown in this report are prices reported by licensed timber buyers. The cooperation of those timber buyers who participated m the survey is greatly appreciated. Illinois is divided into three price-reporting zones, based on timber resources, similarity, utilization standards and practices and soil types. Zone 1 is the Southern Unit; Zone 2, the Qaypan Unit; and Zone 3, the Prairie Unit. Ranges of pnces for each zone are shown on the back of this repori. This re|x>rt can be used only as a general guide for determining market value of timber. General market and economic conditions are the major price- determining factors. Certain local considerations such as accessibility, site and terrain, distance to market, size of sale, and tree size and quality also affect the pnce paid. For technical, marketing or management assistance, contact your local State Forester, or the Division of Forest Resources. Dlinois Department of Natural Resources, 600 North Grand Avenue, West, Spnngfield, Dlinois 62706. AVERAGE PRICES FOR STUMPAGE AND FOB. IN SELECTED PERIODS SAWTIMBER - $ PER M BD. FT. SPECIES May 1997 ■ August 1997 November 1997 ■ February 1998 May 1998 ■ August 1998 Stumpage F.O. B. Mill Stumpage FOB. Mill Stumpage FOB. Mill Ash Bass wood Beech Cottonwood 150 100 75 60 320 220 180 150 150 100 75 55 330 230 180 160 160 90 70 60 310 210 160 160 Sweet Gum Elm A Hackberry Hickory Soft Maple 75 75 85 95 180 170 190 220 60 70 80 100 170 170 200 240 80 70 80 120 180 180 220 240 Sugar Maple Black Oak Pin Oak Red Oak 140 160 80 240 300 300 180 410 150 160 90 240 320 320 180 420 190 170 85 260 300 310 180 410 White Oak Yellow Poplar Sycamore Black Walnut 220 120 65 340 380 290 170 510 230 140 70 310 400 270 170 490 250 130 70 350 390 230 180 480 Woods Run Bottomland Woods Run Upland 90 130 200 270 110 180 210 330 100 180 210 270 FACE VENEER - $ PER M BD. FT. Red Oak 620 990 600 1,220 530 890 White Oak 1,000 1,800 1,120 1,840 820 1,530 Walnut 1,500 2.300 1,470 2.330 1.550 2.780 COOPERAGE - $ PER M BD FT 1 White Oak 1 250 420 1 300 550 1 300 580 1 UNPEELED PULPWOOD - $ PER TON 1 Ton 1 2.00 17.00 1 2.70 19.00 1 3.20 19.70 1 Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 19 Timber Prices May 1998 - August 1998 December 1. 1998 MOST COMMONLY REPORTED PRICES PAID ILLINOIS TIMBER PRODUCERS | May 1998 - December 1998 PRODUCT UNIT Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Stumpaee F.O.B. Mill Stumpage F.O.B. Mill Stumpage FOB. Mill 1. Sawtimber Dollars Ash Mbd.ft. 100-200 250-350 80-250 250400 80-250 250300 Basswood M bd. ft. 100 200 50-150 150 50-150 140-325 Beech M bd. ft. 50-100 225 NA 100 50-70 140-150 Cottonwood M bd. ft. 40-100 120-170 50-100 140-200 30-60 120-200 Sweet Gum Mbd.ft 50-110 200 70-100 180-200 60 140-150 Elm & Hackberry Mbd.ft. 50-110 200-225 50-100 180-200 30-75 140-200 Hickory Mbd.ft. 50-125 200-250 50-100 180-300 50-75 150320 Soft Maple M bd. ft. 75-125 200-225 70-200 180-360 70-200 160-370 Sugar Maple M bd. ft. 150-250 250400 120250 180450 150-250 200400 Black Oak M bd. ft. 150-250 270-500 100-300 180450 80-200 200-375 Pin Oak M bd. ft. 50-110 200-225 50-165 150-200 30-100 150-160 Red Oak Mbd.ft. 180-300 350450 150-400 200-750 150400 200-600 White Oak M bd. ft. 160-300 300-750 150-500 200-750 150-500 200-500 Yellow Poplar M bd. ft. 100-200 250-280 NA 200 80 160-240 Sycamore M bd. ft. 50-110 200-225 50-100 150-200 30-60 150 Black Walnut M bd. ft. 250450 250-500 200-500 500 100-500 400-600 Woods Run Bottomland M bd. ft. 60-150 180-250 65-160 150-180 50-200 150-320 Woods Run Upland M bd. ft. 100-250 180400 70-250 180400 100-300 200400 STATEWIDE | Stumpase F.O.B. Mill 2. Face Veneer Red Oak M bd. ft. 350-800 600-1.500 White Oak M bd. ft. 500-1.200 850-2.330 Walnut Mbd.ft. 450-3.000 1.2004,000 3. Cooperage ' White Oak Mbd.ft. 220-400 550-600 4. Pulpwood Unpecled Mbd.ft. 3.00-3.50 18.00-21.00 LOG SCALES USED BY REPORTING BUYERS Scale Percent Using Doyle Scribner International 97 3 CUSTOM SAWING BY THOSE REPORTING Percent Rated Reported Reporting $/M bd. ft. Region Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Illinois 18 18 14 17 100-180 150-250 150-300 100-300 VOLUME OF 1997 OPERATIONS Size in (000) bd. ft. Zoncl Zone 2 Zone 3 All % % .% % 1-100 6 27 46 28 100-500 29 33 25 30 500- 1,000 12 7 8 8 1.000-3.000 24 23 4 17 3,000 + 29 10 17 17 Cooperage is the manufacture of barrels. Face veneer is logs cut into thm sheets or "veneer" used mostly by furniture builders. Pulpwood is used in making paper, flberfooard, and similar products. M bd. ft. means thousand board feet. Sawtimber refers to logs that arc cut into lumber or limbers. F.O.B. refers to the price paid for timber delivered to the mill. MARKED TIMBER SALES - MAY 1998 - AUGUST 1998 STATEWIDE STUMPAGE Woods Run Upland $152-$427/M bd. ft. Woods Run Bottomland $ 1 8 1 -$320/M bd. ft. •Prices supplied to District Foresters by seller, may include some veneer. Garry D. Kepley, State Statistician "Printed by authority of the State of Illinois. "1 1/18/98. 1.650. 6991 Tom Pordugal, Rick Kestle. Agricultural Statisticians Illinois Forest Management Newsletter U of I Extension Newsletter Service University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1917 S. Wright St. Champaign, IL 61820 Return Service Requested 12/31/99 Ag Library Serials Cler 226 Mumford Hall 1301 W Gregory Dr CAMPUS HAIL MC-710 EDITORIAL OFFICE: W-503 TURNER HALL, 1102 S. GOODWIN AVE., URBANA, IL 61801 tiMVKRSITV OF ILLINOIS EXTENSION L ILLINOIS FOREST MANAGEMENT Biannual Newsletter for Illinois Landowners IN THIS ISSUE Page 1 Page 7 Pages Page 9 Tree Felling Mechanics Tax Saving Tips for Tree Planting Projects Quincy, IL IW-State Forest Stewardship Conference Agenda Announced Illinois Timber Prices W36 I a \ 0 «99 Volume 1,1999 No. 36 Woodcock illustration by Ned Smith '■ ^'-^ I Illinois Forest Management Newsletter is produced by the Uni- versity of Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Environ- mental Sciences and University of Illinois Extension. Our newslet- ter features information from many sources to help you make in- formed decisions concerning your woodland resources. We en- courage your questions and comments which we will share with our readers as space permits. Direct your inquiries to: Editor, IFM Newsletter, W-503 Turner Hall, 1 102 S. Goodwin Ave.. Urbana. IL 61801. The following article is a continuation m the series of Tim's Tips articles reprinted from the logger training manual developed by Mike Bolin, Extension Forester and Tim Ard, president of Forest Applica- tions Training, Inc. for the Illinois Pro Logger Training Program. The chain saw safety and timber felling information is useful for landowners who own and use a chain saw on their property. THE FELLING PLAN Timber harvesting and competitive sports have many simi larities. Both require skilled professionals, teamwork, com munication, and a good game plan. Perhaps the most mipor- tant is the plan for without it, there would be no consistancy in the way timber harvesting is accomplished. The following elements are an integral part of any good tree felling plan: 1. Identify Potential Hazards - Look up into the crown of the tree and identify dead limbs and hanging branches that could possibly fall on you as the tree begins to fall. Also assess the area into which the tree will fall for hazards. Clearing ground debris and live saplings or shrubs within the immediate vicinity oi the designated tree is very important. Make a mental note of where these hazards are and be alert for any that might dislodge as the tree falls. Once the tree's on the ground, pause to observe any residual trees that are still swaying for any limbs that might fall. State - County - Local Groups - U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperating University of Illinois Extension Provides Equal Opportunities in Programs and Employment 2. Determine Side or Weighted Lean - Most trees lean to one side or the other. Side lean determines the 'good and bad' side of the tree with respect to the side the chain saw operator should finish on. It is desirable, but not always possible, to cut from the good side of the tree. The bad side of the tree is the side to which it leans or is weighted. It is possible to have the tree's trunk leaning one way and to have the majority of the the tree's crown on the oppo- site side. While standing back from the tree along the felling line, the operator should look up into the tree and draw a circle around the outer-most limbs of the tree's canopy. From the center of this imaginary circle, drop an imaginary plumb line to the ground. The distance from this spot on the ground to the center of the tree's trunk gives a good estimate of the amount of weighted side lean. 3. Determine Your Escape Route - Always pick a "retreat route" away from a falling tree. This escape route should be clear of ground debris and should be opposite the direction of fall and at a 45 degree angle away from the butt of the tree. 4. Determine the Hinge Size - To control the fall of a tree, a hinge is necessary. Setting up the right length and thickness of hinge are important to avoid pulling fiber from the butt log as the tree falls. As a general rule of thumb, use 10% of the diameter of the tree at D.B.H. (4.5 feet above the ground) for the width of the hinge. It should have equal width across the stump. For example, a 1 5-inch tree should have a hinge 1 .5 inches wide (thick). After felling a few trees, look to see ifyou're getting fiber pull. If so, reduce the width of the hinge. Hinge width (thickness) will vary by species, also. The length of the hinge is also important in guiding the direction of fall. The general rule of thumb here is to set up a hinge length that is 80% of tree's diameter at D.B.H. A 15-inch tree would need a 12- inch hinge. Some trees with heavy side lean will require a hinge of greater length. 5. Establish Your Cutting Plan. After the notch and hinge are set up, how do you intend to finish the back cut? This cut should be level with the open face notch. Always remember to finish the back cut on the good side of the tree. If this is not possible, be aware of hazards that could cause safety problems. If problems arise, re- assess the situation before falling the tree. Considering Side Lean Trees with side lean pose a special problem. In addition to creating a good and bad side of the tree as discussed earlier, side lean can make it difficult to place a tree exactly where the operator would like it to go. For example, a tree with 5 feet of side lean will actually land 5 feet to the right of where the base of the tree is aimed. This may be enough to cause a tree to hang up or create skidding problems. Therefore, trees with side lean should actually be aimed in the other Aim 5 feet of righl side lean direction. For example, a tree with 5 feet of right side lean should be aimed least 5 feet to the left of the intended target. However, it has bee observed that the hinge weakens as the tree falls and at some poii the side lean weight of the tree tends to pull it in that directioi Therefore, a rule of thumb has been developed that says aim tf tree an additional 50% of the side lean in the opposite directioi For example, our tree with 5 feet of right side lean must be aime 7 1/2 feet to the left of the intended target. Open Face Notcii and Sight Line The function of the notch is to allow the tree to fall without breal ing the hinge prematurely. Typically, most notches used by loj gers and landowners are less than 45 degrees. These small notche close up before the tree has fallen even half-way to the groun( When this happens, stress is put on the hinge causing fiber pu and splitting of the butt log or barber-chairing. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter The proper undercut should be an open face at least 70 to 90 de- crees (see illustration below). The best way to form this opening is to make the top cut first. The chain saw operator cuts in a down- ward and slightly inward direction until the width of the notch is approximately 80% of the diameter of the tree (see' Setting Up the Hinge' later). The operator then removes the chainsaw and fin- ishes the notch by making the second (bottom) cut in a slightly upward direction. Open Face Notch 70-90 degree angle ^ The advantages of making the top cut first are that the operator can easily establish hinge width and can also look into the top cut and actually see when the second cut meets. With practice, a chainsaw operator should be able to have both cuts meet exactly on the first try. A by-pass of no more than 3/8 inch is acceptable. Positioning the Notch and Direction of Fall Many saws have a built-in sight Ime which can be used to establish falling direction of a tree. The line is usually a raised ridge of plastic or a decal. In the absence of a sight line, any seam on the casing which is perpendicular to the bar is acceptable. The operator stands behind the saw while leaning against the tree and sights over the saw. Most saws have a felling sight on them similar to the sight on a rifle. Look for a straight line that is molded into the plastic case on the top of the saw. Pointing this sight line at your target will position the notch cut in the tree's trunk in the direction you want to fell the tree. When the target and the sight line are lined up, the operator begins the first downward cut of the notch. The bottom cut is then made and the resulting face notch will determine the direction of fall of the tree (see photo next page). The sight line on the saw can be used like a gun sight to determine an exact falling direction for the tree. Setting Up The Hinge The hinge is the single most important part of the felling cui. li controls the felling direction, reduces the chance for hang-ups. and can increase productivity. If a proper notcii has been formed, ttie hinge will control the fail of the tree all the way to the eround. Direction of Fall Hinge i^ Open Face Notch Illinois Forest Management Newsletter Hinges should be the same thickness all the way across the stump. If the hinge is pointed in the proper direction, using the sight line on the saw, the tree will fall correctly. Loggers often attempt to swing trees into openings by cutting the hinge off on one side. Efforts to swing trees into openings often result in hung trees. This is because it is difficult to guess how much of the hmge should be cut off to swing a tree. It is much more accurate to aim or sight the tree and have it fall exactly in the intended direction. It should also be noted that the fibers of the hinge tend to break from the back. As the tree falls, fibers along the back of the hinge will break first. After the tree reaches a certain point in its fall, only the fibers at the front of the hinge are left to finish steering the tree. Therefore, making a hinge thin on one side will not accomplish any steering function. Cutting off all or any part hinge is considered a safety violation. The only time a hinge can be cut is if the tree does become hung up. It may become desirable to cut off one side or all of the hinge so the tree will roll out, but exercise extreme caution when doing this. The length and thickness (width) of the hinge are dependant on the species of tree and its DBH (diameter at breast height, 4 1/2 feel above the ground). A good rule of thumb for the thickness (width) of the notch is 10% of the tree's DBH. This can be increased or reduced depending on the species. For example, hickory will likely pull fiber if the hinge is too thick. Something less than 10% of DBH would be appropriate for hickory. The length of the hinge is also calculated from the tree's DBH. Again a good rule of thumb to use is 80% of the tree's DBH. This means the logger will have to visualize how far back he will have to cut the notch to achieve a hinge width of 80% of the tree's DBH. Refer to the diagram below for an example of these two hinge calcu- lations. Open Face Notch Hinge ^ The length of the hinge (A to B) is 80 percent of the tree's diameter at 4.5 feet above the ground (D.B.H.) The thickness (width) of the hinge is 10 percent of the tree's D.B.H. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter The Back Cut The back cut is important because the execution of this cut deter- mines the proper formation of the hinge and releases the tree to allow it to fall. Before determining the proper technique for the back cut, the chain saw operator must determine if the tree has forward or backward lean. If the tree leans back, a wedge or wedges may be needed to lift the tree to an upright position until its center of gravity is moving forward and it will fall on its own. A tree that is standing straight or one that has back lean will require additional steps in the back-cut plan. The back-cut plan is actually number 5 in the information gathered before felling occurs; check for haz- ards, determine weighted side and forward/back lean, determine your escape route, calculate the hinge size, then develop your back- cut plan. 1, Small Trees and Trees with Little or Forward No Lean - The best way to cut these trees is to make the open face notch and cut straight in from the back making sure sufficient hinge is left to control the fall of these trees. Some trees with little or no forward lean may need a push by hand to get them falling. If the tree is big enough, a wedge can be in- serted behind the saw. 2. The Bore Cut - Trees with backward or forward lean pose some difficulty and generally require the formation of a proper hinge prior to completing the back cut. On these trees it is recommended that the operator use the bore or plunge cut as the first step in making a back cut. If your saw has a tip guard on the bar to help prevent kickback from occurring, you will not be able to make a plunge or bore cut. When attempting a bore cut, it is very important to always use the attack corner of the chain saw bar. The attack corner is the bottom corner of the bar tip. Never use the kickback zone or top corner of the bar tip as kickback might result. It is also very important for the teeth to be properly filed and that the saw runs at maximum RPM Direction of Fall Hinge Bore Cut Swing in on attack corner, run saw through tree. when making the cut. The faster the chain spins, the smoother the cutting surface. A slow turning chain has a tendency to want to 'jump' and bounce as it cuts and kickback could easily occur. 3. Trees with Forward Lean - Trees with forward lean can easily split, pull splinters, or barber chair. Therefore, it is important on these trees to use the bore cut, set up the desired hinge thickness, and then complete the back cut leaving a strap of uncut wood at the back of the tree. This strap of wood and the hinge will hold the tree in place and prevent it from falling until you are ready to release it. Trees with Forward Lean Hinge Strap Standing along the escape route, the operator may now cut the holding strap of wood about 1/2 to 1 inch below the level of the back cut. The wood strap will split, releasing the tree and allow it to fall in the desired direction while the operator is retreating on the escape route out of danger. Sometimes if a tree has very little forward lean, the operator may elect to just cut straight back out of the tree without leaving a strap. If the tree diameter is too big for the chain saw bar to reach all the way through, the tree can be bore cut from both sides. Using the corner of the notch to guide the start of each bore cut will ensure the cuts are fairly level. It is important to initiate the bore cut from the bad side first reaching no more than half way through the tree. Cut #2 Cut #1 Bad Side Strap* Cut #3/Final Cut Illinois Forest Management Newsletter The operator may then cut back out of the tree on the bad side, move himself/herself to the good side of the tree and bore cut through to meet the first cut. He/she then cuts back out on the good side leaving a strap which can be released from the escape route. With experience, the bore cuts will meet exactly, or almost exactly, forming a level, precise stump. 4. Trees with Back Lean - Trees with back lean present special problems in that they may set back on the saw while making the back cut. The use a wedge is recommended on all trees with back lean. The Tim's Tip' feature in the next issue of Illinois Forest Management Newsletter wi\ focus on how to determine if a wedge is necessary and how to use it properly. If the tree is small enough for the bar to reach all the way through, the simplest method is to bore cut the tree from the good side forming a precise hinge, swing the tip of the bar towards the rear of the tree leaving a strap of wood to prevent the tree from sitting back. Insert a wedge between the hinge wood and the strap. Cut the strap and drive the wedge with an ax. This is illustrated below. Hinge Wedge Cut Wedge Strap If the tree is too big for the bar to reach all the way through, bore from the bad side first, remembering not to bore more than halfway through the tree. Bring the saw straight to the back of the tree on the bad side. Insert a wedge in this opening. The next step is to bore from the good side slightly below the first bore cut and cut back through the tree about 1/2 inch below the wedge. Hitting the wedge a couple of times with an ax will split the holding wood and force the tree over. Refer to the illustrations above. Care must be taken to never saw the supporting wood under the wedge. Wedge Make the second cut 1/2" below the first cut to avoid hitting the wedge. Another method to use on trees that are bigger than the bar is to first bore half-way through the tree on the bad side, start cutting out towards the back of the tree and then swing the saw around the tree towards the good side. When the saw is approximately half way around, insert a wedge behind it and continue cutting toward the good side until the hinge is completely formed. Take the saw out and drive the wedge until the tree begins to fall. Refer to the illustration below for this method. Hinge Good Side Bad Side Cutting Around the Back , Hinge Wedge Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 7 Tax Saving Tips for Tree Planting Projects If you planted trees (reforestation project) on your property this year, you may want to look into the federal income tax's Refores- tation Tax Credit and Amortization option when you prepare your 1999 tax return. The reforestation tax credit and 7-year amortization continues to be one of the best tax advantages for forest landowners. If you refor- ;sted during 1999, you can claim a 10-percent investment tax credit for the first $ 10,000 you spent for reforestation during the tax year. In addition, you can amortize (deduct) all of your 1999 reforestation :osts (up to $10,000), minus half the tax credit taken, over the next 7 years (actually 8 tax years). The election to amortize must be made 3n a timely tax return for the year in which the reforestation ex- penses were incurred. (Passive owners may or may not be eligible For the amortization and credit). Here's how it works. Assume you spent $4,000 to plant an tract of ground on your property in 1999. You claim a $400 tax credit ( 10 percent of $4,000) for 1999. You can also deduct 95 percent of these reforestation costs over the next 8 tax years. Due to a half-year convention you can only claim one-half of the annual amortizable portion for 1999. This means that on your 1999 tax return you can deduct one-half of (0.95 x $4,000 divided by 7) or $27 1 . For the next 5 tax years you can deduct (0.95 x $5,000 divided by 7) or $542, and ihe remaining $271 can be deducted the 8th tax year. rhe annual reforestation amortization is a deduction to adjusted gross income. It can be claimed on Form 1 040 on the line for adjust- ments rather than being claimed on Schedule A under miscella- tieous deductions. (If you use Schedule A for this purpose, you :an claim only aggregated miscellaneous deductions that exceed 2 percent of adjusted gross income). Form 3468 is used to claim the investment tax credit. i\ny reforestation costs exceeding the $ 10,000 annual limit should be capitalized (entered into your timber account). You can recover (deduct) these costs when you sell the timber. A final word of caution: the tax credit and 7-year amortization de- ductions are subject to recapture if you dispose of your trees — within 5 years of planting for the credit and within 10 years of planting for the amortization. Cost-share Payments If you received cost-share assistance under one or more of the Federal or State cost-share programs for your reforestation project, you may have to report some or all of it as ordinary income. You have several options. You have the option to include it as income and then recover the part that you pay plus the cost-share payment through the amortization and reforestation tax credit already de- scribed. You also have the option to exclude the "excludable por- tion" from income if certain conditions are met. These conditions are: ( 1 ) the cost-share program has to be approved for exclusion by the IRS; and (2) the maximum amount excludable per acre is the greater of: (a) the present value of $2.50 per acre or (b) the present value of 10 percent of the average income per acre for the past 3 tax years. This second requirement gets rather complicated because you have to determine an appropriate interest rate to compute the present values. Programs approved for exclusion by the IRS include the Forestry Incentives Program (FIP), the Forest Stewardship Incen- tive Program (SIP), the Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP), the En- vironmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), and the Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program (WHIP), plus several State programs (check with the Illinois DNR - Division of Forest Resources in Spnng- field [217-782-2361 ] if you planted trees under the Illinois Forestry Development Act program). In some cases, taxpayers may be better off to exclude cost-share payments, while others may be better off not to exclude the pay- ments. Instead, these landowners may be better off to claim the cost-share payments as part of the reforestation tax credit and 7- year amortization. The important point here is: You must report cost-share payments. If you decide to exclude, attach a statement to your return that states specifically what cost-share payments you received, that you choose to exclude some or all of them, and how you determined the excludable amount. Trees Planted Under the Conservation Reserve Program If you planted trees under the Conservation Reserve Program fCRP), you must report your annual payment as ordinary income. If you received CRP cost-share assistance funds for planting your trees, you must also report these as ordinary income. CRP cost-share payments used to establish trees can be claimed as part of the reforestation expenses reported for the reforestation tax credit and 7-year amortization. Farmers may treat expenditures for soil and water conservation on farmland as expenses in the year incurred, rather than capitalizing them (CRP expenditures qualify). However, the amount deductible in any year shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross income from farming. Adapted from a US Forest Service Southern Region website ar- ticle written by Larry Bishop, Forest Management and Taxation Specialist, Atlanta, GA. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 8 Tri-State Forest Landowner Conference Scheduled Landowners who live in western Illinois, southeast Iowa and northeast Missouri are invited to attend the Tri-State Forest Stewardship Conference on Saturday, November 13, 1999 at the Quincy Holiday Inn in Quincy, IL. The conference program agenda is presented below. Landowners interested in attending may use the form on this page or they may call Judy Stoll @ 217-333-2778 and ask for the conference brochure/registration form to be sent to them. Registration is $25.00 per person and includes a continental breakfast and lunch. Pre- registration for the conference is required. Tri-State Forest Stewardship Conference Saturday, November 13, 1999 Quincy Holiday Inn, Quincy, IL Conference Program Agenda (Pre-registration Required - No Walk-in Registration) 7:30-8:30 a.m. Conference Check-in and Continental Breakfast Visit with your State Service Forester and NRCS District Conservationist in the Douglas Room 8:30 a.m. Welcome and General Announcements 8:45 a.m. Opening General Session - "Identifying and Establishing Your Forest and Land Management Goals' Concurrent Sessions 9:45-10:45 a.m. "Steps to Producing High Quality Timber" "Agroforestry — An Overview" "Woodland Wildflower Identification" 10:45-11: 10 a.m. Morning Break 11:10a.m. -12:10 "Nut Production — An Alternative Income Opportunity" "Steps to a Successful Timber Sale" "Exotic Species — Coming to a Woodland Near You" 12:15-1:15 p.m. Luncheon 1 :20-2:20 p.m. "Tree Seed Collection — An Alternative Income Opportunity' "Mechanics of Tree Pruning" "Introduction to Woodland Wildflower Propagation" 2:30-3:30 p.m. "Riparian Forest Buffers — Common Sense Conservation" "Processing Your Trees Into Useful Products" "Introduction to Tree Indentification" 3:40-4:40 p.m. "Leased Hunting — An Alternative Income Opportunity" "Government Cost-Share Programs for Forest Landowners" "Steps to Successful Tree Planting" 4:45 p.m. Adjourn Yes, I would like to attend the 1999 Tri-Sate Forest Stewardship Conference in Quincy, IL Please send me registration information Name: Address: City: Zip: State: Return to: Judy Stoll, W-503 Turner Hall, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801; 217-333-3650 Illinois Forest Management Newsletter s I L L I N O I S Illinois Agricultural Statistics Service P.O Box 19283 Springfield. IL 62794-9283 Ph (217) 492-4295 ILLINOIS TIMBER PRICES U.S. Department of Agriculture DIVISION OF FOREST RESOURCES 600 Nonh Grand Avenue WtsI Spnngfield. Illinois. 62706 Phone: (217) 782-2361 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Cl^l/I/HH ZONE "■'^HV- (l-L ZONE 2 \J ^ ;^~rtd/ PRICE ^ ' H^' REPORTING X— 1/ ZONES 1^ 7 Uil i>w^ ZONE 1 ■;i.— >ti) June 2. 1999 PRICES PAID ILLINOIS TIMBER PRODUCERS NOVEMBER 1998 THROUGH FEBRUARY 1999 Winter sawiimber prices paid to Illinois limber growers Eenerallv showed mixed trends for FOB. Mill and stumpaee compared to both the previous winter and summer. Of the timber buyers reporting volume of their 1 998-99 operations, 37% indicated their volume was 500 thou.sand board feet or nwre. This report is prepared by the Illinois Agricultural Statistics Service in cooperation with the Illinois Division of Forest Resources. Unless otherwise indicated, prices shown in this report are prices reported by licensed timber buyers. The cooperation of those timber buyers who participated in the survey is greatly appreciated. Illinois is divided into three price-reporting zones, based on limber resources, similarity, utilization standards and practices and soil types. Zone 1 is the Southern Unit; Zone 2, the Claypan Unit; and Zone 3, the Praine Unit. Ranges of prices for each zone are shown on the back of this report. This report can be used only as a general guide for determining market value of timber. General market and economic conditions are the major pnce- determining factors. Certain local considerations such as accessibility, site and terrain, distance to market, size of sale, and tree size and quality also affect the price paid. For technical, marketing or management assistance, contact your local State Forester, or the Division of Forest Resources, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, 600 North Grand Avenue, West, Springfield, Illinois 62706. AVERAGE PRICES FOR STUMPAGE AND FOB. IN SFI FCTED PERIODS SAWTIMBER - $ PER M BD. FT. SPECIES November 1997 - February 1998 May 1998 -August 1998 November 1998 - February 1999 Slumpage F.O. B. Mill Stumpage F.O.B. Mill Stumpage FOB. Mill Ash Basswood Beech Cottonwood 150 330 100 230 75 180 55 160 160 310 90 210 70 160 60 160 160 100 80 55 300 250 200 160 Sweel Gum Elm & Hackberry Hickory Soft Maple 60 170 70 170 80 200 100 240 80 180 70 180 80 220 120 240 80 75 100 100 180 180 240 240 Sugar Maple Black Oak Pin Oak Red Oak 150 320 100 320 90 180 240 420 190 300 170 310 85 180 260 410 160 170 85 220 320 300 200 360 White Oak Yellow Poplar Sycamore Black Walnut 230 400 140 270 70 170 310 490 250 390 130 230 70 180 350 480 220 140 70 350 360 280 170 510 Woods Run Bottomland Woods Run Upland 110 210 180 330 100 210 180 270 100 150 210 250 FACE VENEER - $ PER M BD. FT. Red Oak 600 1,220 530 890 480 920 White Oak 1.120 1,840 820 1,530 970 1.660 Walnut 1.470 2.330 1,550 2,780 1.390 1.940 COOPERAGE - $ PER M BD. FT. 1 While Oak 1 300 550 1 300 580 1 280 450 1 UNPEELED PULPWOOD - $ PER TON 1 Ton 1 2.70 19.00 1 3.20 19.70 1 3.00 1950 1 Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 10 Timber Prices November 1998-February 1999 June 2. 1999 MOST COMMONLY REPORTED PRICES PAID ILLINOIS TIMBER PRODUCERS November 1998-February 1999 PRODUCT UNIT Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 i Stumpace F.O.B. Mill Stumpage FOB. Mill Stumpage FOB. Mill 1. Sawiimber Dollars Ash M bd. ft. 100-250 200-300 80-300 300^00 60-250 180-370 Basswood M bd. ft. NA 150-350 40-155 150-400 60-225 160-350 Beech M bd. ft. 50-100 190-200 80-100 200 NA NA Cottonwood M bd. ft. 50-80 150-190 25-90 120-200 20-80 100-200 Sweet Gum M bd. ft. 50-125 130-220 60-120 120-210 NA NA Elm & Hackberry M bd. ft. 50-100 150-300 40-120 120-250 30-100 120-250 Hickory M bd. ft. 75-150 150-350 40-200 125^00 50-200 150-400 Soft Maple M bd. ft. 50-100 150-350 40-200 150-380 50-200 160-360 Sugar Maple M bd. ft. 100-250 200-450 80-350 190-600 60-300 180-450 Black Oak M bd. ft. 100-300 220-400 75-400 150-500 50-200 150-350 Pm Oak M bd. ft. 50-125 150-220 40-120 120-250 50-150 150-300 Red Oak M bd. ft. 200-370 220-500 80-400 240-500 100-350 200-500 White Oak M bd. ft. 180-400 350-550 80^00 220-500 80-350 200-490 Yellow Poplar M bd. ft. 100-200 200-400 60-250 200-400 NA NA Sycamore M bd. ft. 50-100 130-220 30-100 100-250 30-100 120-200 Black Walnut M bd. ft. 150-800 250-650 60-700 250-700 120-550 200-850 Woods Run Bottomland M bd. ft. 80-150 180-300 50-200 120-250 20-150 200-300 Woods Run Upland M bd. ft 80-250 190-400 60-300 160-325 50-300 250-300 STATEWIDE | Stumpage FOB Mill 1 2. Face Veneer Red Oak M bd. ft. 200-1,000 800-1,000 White Oak M bd. ft. 200-1.800 950-2,500 Walnut M bd. ft. 600-2,000 1,500-2,500 1 3 Cooperage White Oak M bd. ft 150-400 300-550 4. Pulpwood Unpeeled M bd ft. 2.00-4 00 17.25-22.00 1 LOG SCALES USED BY REPORTING BUYERS | Scale Percent Using Doyle 96 Scribner 4 International - CUSTOM SAWING BY THOSE REPORTING | Region Percent Reporting Rated Reponed S/M bd. ft. Zone 1 18 100-200 Zone 2 14 140-300 Zone 3 16 110-250 Illinois 15 100-300 VOLUME OF 1997 OPERATIONS Size in (000) bd. ft. Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 All % % % % 1 - 100 19 32 42 32 100-500 25 25 42 31 500- 1,000 25 4 4 9 1.000-3,000 31 25 4 19 3,000-1- - 14 8 9 Cooperage is the manufacture of barrels. Face veneer is logs cut into thin sheets or "veneer" used mostly by furniture builders. Pulpwood is used in making paper, fiberboard. and similar products. M bd. ft. means thousand board feet. Sawtimber refers to logs that are cut into lumber or timbers. F.O.B. refers to the price paid for timber delivered to the mill. MARKED TIMBER SALES - NOVEMBER 1998 - FEBRUARY 1999 STATEWIDE STUMPAGE Woods Run Upland $137-$401/M bd. ft. Woods Run Bottomland Insufficient Repwrts *Pnces supplied to Disuict Foresters by seller, may include some veneer. Garry D. Kepley, State Statistician "Printed by authority of the State of Illinois. Tom Pordugal. Rick Kestle, Agricultural Statisticians '5/27/99, 1.650,7359 Illinois Forest Management Newsletter University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign U of I Extension Newsletter Service 528 Bevier Hall 905 S. Goodwin Ave. Urbana, IL 61801 Return Service Requested 12/31/99 Ag Library Serials Clerk 22 6 Mumford Hall 1301 W Gregory Dr Campus Mail MC-710 LNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS EXTENSION A Biannual Newsletter for Illinois Landowners IN THIS ISSUE Page 1 Page 6 Pages Page 10 Using a Wedge to Aid in Tree Felling Tax Tips for Forest Landowners for the 1999 Tax Year 2000 Tri-State Forest Stewardship Conference Agenda Announced Illinois Timber Prices L ILLINOIS FOREST MANAGEMENT KQ, Library Volume!, 1999 No. 37 Illinois Forest Management Newsletter is produced by the Uni- versity of Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Environ- mental Sciences and University of Illinois Extension. Our newslet- ter features information from many sources to help you make in- formed decisions concerning your woodland resources. We en- courage your questions and comments which we will share with our readers as space permits. Direct your inquiries to: Editor, IFM Newsletter, W-503 Turner Hall, 1 102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana. IL 61801. The following article is a continuation in the series of Tim's Tips articles reprinted from the logger U"aining manual developed by Mike Bolin, Extension Forester and Tim Ard, president of Forest Applica- tions Training, Inc. for the Illinois Pro Logger Training Program. The chain saw safety and timber felling information is useful for landowners who own and use a chain saw on their properly. USING A WEDGE TO AID IN TREE FELLING The use of wedges in logging has a long history. The me- chanics involved are quite simple. Depending on the height and diameter of the tree, it may be possible to fell it in a direction opposite of its lean with a wedge that gives no more than one inch of lift (procedure will be explained below). Today, most wedges are made from space-age plastics. They are light-weight and do little damage to chain teeth if the saw comes in contact with them. The wedge is used to support the weight of the tree's trunk (bole) or limbs to keep the saw from binding or for changing the direction of fall during harvesting. Learning how and when to use a wedge is not complicated, but using one can be tiring if you're not in shape! After placing the notch in the tree's bole and setting up the hinge, the backcut is initiated (see Illustration 1 on page 2). Depending State - County - Local Groups - U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperating University of Illinois Extension Provides Equal Opportunities in Programs and Employment Direction of Backcut Open Face Notch Direction ofFaU Hinge Side View ^ Open Face Notch Illustration 1. The Open Face Notch and Hinge. Top View on the tree's size and any immovable obstructions nearby, the backcut can be made in one cut if the tree is small or in a series of cuts if the tree's diameter is greater than the length of the chain bar on the saw. For trees with a diameter less than the bar length, the backcut is performed in one step from the good side of the tree. Tree's with a diameter larger than the chain bar require the backcut to be made in at least two steps. Here, the backcut is initiated from the tree's bad side (When viewed from the line of fall, the bad side is the side where the tree 's weighted side lean exists. It is possible to have a tree lean to one side and have the weighted lean be on opposite side because most of the limbs are found there.) and proceeds half- way through the trunk and out the back side of the trunk (see Illustration 2). The saw is removed and the logger moves to the opposite side (good side) of the tree and continues the backcut until the tree begins to fall. If there is concern that the tree may set back on (pinch) the saw's bar and chain due to weighted side- or back lean or gusts of wind, a wedge could be set in the cut on the bad side when the logger withdraws the saw and before he moves to the tree's good side to finish the cut. The wedge does not have to be driven in too far, just enough to help support the tree's vv-eight. Wedges are commonly used on trees with back lean — lean in the direction opposite of the intended felling direction. The wedge is used as a fulcrum to lift the weighted center of the tree past the pivot point so that it will fall in the opposite direction. How large of a wedge or how many wedges it will take to overcome a tree's back lean is fairly easy to compute. While it may be possible to over- come the back lean of many trees by using a wedge, common sense should prevail. In situations where the tree has severe back lean or trees with moderate back lean that may have rotten or dotty wood inside, it would be prudent to hire a professional arborist to remove the tree. To compute the size of the wedge or the number of wedges that must be used to overcome a tree's back lean, some information must be collected prior to initating the backcut. It is assumed that an open face notch (70 degree opening or more) and the proper size hinge for the tree will be used. The pivot point of the tree's fall is Hinge Bad Side of the Tree Make the second cut 1/2" below the first cut to avoid hitting the wedge. Hinge Wedge Illustration 2. The Backcut Procedure. When a back-leaning tree is large enough that the backcut cannot be made in one cut, the cut is started from the tree's bad side, works to the center, and out the back. A wedge is set to keep the tree from sit- ting back on the saw and the cut is fin- ished from the tree's good side. The wedge is used to drive the tree over in the direc- tion of its intended fall. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter Direction of Backcut Illustration 3. To compute Measure- ment A, measure from the front of the hinge to the furthest point on the back side of the trunk along the direction of the backcut. Open Face Notch Measure This Distance (Measurement A) the front side of the hinge (see Illustration 1). This is the point from which the first measurement is taken. Measure from the front side of the hinge to the furthest point on the back side of tree where the saw will exit the trunk. The backcut should be level and at the same height as the base of the hinge. This is Measurement A and it should be rounded to the nearest inch (see Illustration 3). Now, determine the total height of the tree. To do this, you will need a straight stick or rod that is equal in length to the distance between your eye and your cupped fingers when you fully extend your arm away from your body. Step away from the tree approxi- mately 40 to 50 feet. The exact distance doesn't matter, but try to walk in a direction that will put you on the same elevation (walk the contour) as the tree's stump, and as close to 90 degrees to the direction of the tree's intended direction of fall as possible. Turn and face the tree. Now, in your mmd's eye, draw an imaginary circle around the furthest reaches of the trees branches. From the center of this circle, plumb an imaginary line to the ground (see Illustra- tion 4 on page 4). Have someone mark this spot on the ground. This spot will be used to compute the tree's weighted back lean. This is the second measurement you will need to remember. Mea- surement B. We'll come back to this measurement shortly. While you're still facing the tree, hold your arm-length stick or rod parallel to the tree's lean. Fully extend your arm and place the bottom of the stick at the base of the tree. The angle between your arm and the stick should be 90 degrees. Do not tilt the stick toward or away from you. Tilting the stick toward or away from you will distort the measurement and will cause subsequent calculation er- rors. Without moving your head, look up and see where the top of the tree intersects the stick. If the top is past the end of the stick, back up until the tree's top intersects the top of the stick. Con- versely, if the top of the tree does not fully reach the end of the stick, move closer to the tree until the top intersects the top of the stick. Mark the spot on the ground where you are standing with your stick or a scuff mark in the dirt. Measure from this point back to the tree's trunk. This is the total height of the tree. This is the third measurement you will need to remember. Measurement C. (You just used the principle of similar angles, which \ou learned and used in geometry. What you created was a right triangle with two, forty-five degree angles. This makes the two legs of the tri- angle— the total height of the tree and the distance you're stand- ing from the tree — equal.) Now, determine the amount of back lean by measuring the distance (in inches) from the front of the hinge (back of the notch) to the point on the ground where your helper marked the imaginary plumb line. This is Measurement B. The next step is to determine how many segments are in the tree. One segment is equal to the first measurement you made. Measure- ment A. You will need to convert the total height of the tree. Mea- surement C, from feet to inches. To do this, multiply the total height in feet by 1 2, and add the remaining inches. Now, divide the tree's total height in inches (Measurement C) by the number of inches in one segment (Measurement A). This figure equals the total number of segments in the tree. Your probably saying, I don't understand this segment thing. Well imagine a segment as a square with its sides equal to your "Mea- surement A" distance. If the tree has, say, 70 segments in it, imag- ine 70 squares stacked on top of each other laying parallel to a line running up the middle of the tree's trunk (see Illustration 5 on page 5). If you were to backcut the tree properly and insert a I -inch (thick) wedge at the furthest back point on the stump to support the tree, you now want to know how far forward (direction opposite of tree's lean) you can move the center point of the tree's weighted back lean using this wedge. Remember — for the tree to fall in the Illinois Forest Management Newsletter Direction of Fall Illustration 4. Determining the amount of weighted back lean (Measurement B). Measure the Distance from the Front of the Hinge (Back of the Notch) to the Plumb Line Spot on the Ground in Inches. This is Measurement B. direction opposite of it's lean, you have to move the weighted center of the tree past the pivot point (an imaginery line running vertical above the front of the hinge). If you were to drive the wedge in until it is flush with the tree's trunk, you would lift the back corner of the first segment (square) one inch. Correspond- ingly, this would move the opposite corner one inch toward the direction you want the tree to fall (see Illustration 5). But, how many inches did the opposite corner of the second square (seg- ment) move? If you said two inches, you're correct. How many inches did the opposite corner of the seventieth section move toward the direction of fall? Seventy inches. Therefore, you know that in this example a one-inch wedge will lift or move the top of this 70 segment tree 70 inches in the opposite direction. If, m this example. Measurement B is less than 70 inches, only one, 1-inch wedge would be needed to lift the top of the tree past the center pivot point, thus allowing the tree to fall in the direction opposite of its lean. What does this tell us about the ability to wedge different size trees of the same height? Smaller diameter trees (trees with a smaller Measurement A) will have more segments and, therefore, can be wedged (lifted) further than a larger diameter tree of the same height. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter Segment 3 moves 3" Segment 2 moves 2" Segment 1 moves 1" 1-inch wedge Illustration 5. The amount of lift provided by a 1-inch wedge. For example, a tree with a 6-inch base (Measurement A) that is 70 feet tall would have 140 segments, and a 70- foot tree with an 18- inch base (Measurement A) would have 46 segments. Consequently a 1-inch wedge will move the top of the 6-inch tree 140 inches, while the 18-inch tree's top will move only 46 inches using the same wedge. You can easily determine how many wedges will be needed to over- come a tree's back lean. Using more than two wedges is not advis- able for safety reasons. If you find that you'll need two wedges to compensate for the back lean, don't stack the wedges directly top of the other. If you do this, striking one will cause the other one to shoot out like a guided missile possibly striking you or any object in the immediate vicinity. The wedges should be stacked on each other, but at approximately 70 degrees to each other. Alternate striking each wedge until the tree is lifted past its center pivot point and begins its fall. At that point, you should begin your retreat to a point at least 1 5 feet behind the stump in a direction 1 35 degrees away from the direction of fall (see Illustration 6). Turning the wedge sideways and moving it closer to the hinge will make the base of the tree smaller by moving the lifting point closer to the hinge. Therefore, it is easy to increase the number of seg- Direction of Fall Open Face Notch Hinge Direction of Retreat Direction of Retreat Illustration 6. Retreat Route Direction. Hinge 18" Illustration 7. Positioning the Wedge Affects the Segment Size. Wedge 14" Turning the wedge and moving it closer to the hinge decreases the segment size. This increases the number of segments in the tree making it possible to overcome greater back lean with less lift from the wedge provided the weight of the tree is not prohibitive. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter merits in a tree. However, this also makes it harder to drive the wedge and move the tree's weighted center of gravity. Heavy trees will make it extremely difficult to drive the wedge (refer to Illustra- tion 7 on page 5). Use the following tables to determine how many 1 -inch wedges will be necessary for your tree, or do the calculations yourself if your tree is of a size that is different than is listed here. Trees 50' in height Amount of back lean overcome with a 1-inch wedge 100" 75" 60" 50" 42" 37" 33" 30" Trees 60' in height Amount of back lean overcome with a 1-inch wedge 120" 90" 72" 60" 51" 45" 40" 36" Diameter 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Diameter 6" 8" 10" 12" 14" 16" 18" 20" Diameter 6" 8" 10" 12" 14" 16" 18" 20" Trees 70' in height Amount of back lean overcome with a 1-inch wedge 140" 106" 84" 70" 60" 53" 46" 41" In the next issue, Tim's Tips will focus on "How to Minimize Fiber Pull and Splitting" and on "Small Tree Felling". TAX TIPS FOR FOREST LANDOWNERS FOR THE 1999 TAX YEAR by Larry M. Bishop, Forest Management and Taxation Specialist, USDA Forest Service, Atlanta The following article is reprinted from the USDA Forest Service Southern Region 's Cooperative Forestry Technology Update, December 1999, Management Bulletin R8-MB 86 . Here is some information to keep in mind when you prepare your 1999 Federal income tax return. This discussion is necessarily brief, and you should consult other sources for a more comprehensive treatment of the issues. This information is current as of December 1, 1999. Basis and Tax Records Part of the price you receive from a timber sale is taxable income, but part is also your investment (i.e., basis) in the timber sold. Allocate your total costs of acquiring purchased forestland — or the value of inherited forestland — among land, timber, and other capital accounts as soon as possible. Adjust this basis up for new purchases or investments and down for sales or other disposals. When you sell your timber, you can take a depletion deduction equal to ([Adjusted basis -^ Total timber volume just before the sale] X [Timber volume sold]). Good records include a written man- agement plan and a map of your forestland. Keep records that support current deductions 6 years beyond the date the return is due. Keep records that support your basis 6 years beyond your period of ownership. Report basis and timber depletion on Form T (Timber), Schedule B. Passive Loss Rules The passive loss rules continue to be a real puzzle for forest land- owners. This subject is too complex to cover in detail here, but what follows is a very brief summary. Under the passive loss rules, you can be classified in one of three categories: (1) investor, (2) passive participant in a trade or business, or (3) active participant (materially participating) in a trade or business. The law's intent is that you are "materially participating" if your involvement is regular, continuous, and substantial; however, a low level of activity is adequate if that level is all that is required to sustain the trade or business. This means that record keeping is very important! To show material participation, landowners will need to keep records of all business transactions related to manag- ing their timber stands. Likewise, it would be a good idea to keep records of other business-related activities such as landowner meet- ings attended, odometer readings to and from meetings, cancelled checks for registration fees, and copies of meeting agendas. Gener- ally, you will get the best tax advantage if you are "materially par- Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 7 ticipating" in a timber business because all management expenses, property taxes, and interest on indebtedness is fully deductible agamst income from any source. However, if you are "materially participating," you must dispose of your timber under the provi- sions of Section 631 to qualify for capital gains. (This means that you must sell your timber on a "pay-as-cut" or "cut and convert" basis, rather than lump sum.) On the other hand, if you have con- siderable passive income (such as Conservation Reserve Program annual rental payments), it may be to your advantage to be consid- ered "passive." Most of the discussion that follows applies to forest landowners who are "materially participating." Reforestation Tax Credit and Amortization (also discussed in IL Forest Management Newsletter. Vol. J, 1999 No. 36) The reforestation tax credit and 7-year amortization is one of the best tax advantages for forest landowners. If you reforested during 1999, you can claim a 10-percent investment tax credit for the first $ 10,000 you spent for reforestation during the tax year. In addition, you can amortize (deduct) all of your 1999 reforestation costs (up to $ 10,000), minus half the tax credit taken, over the next 7 years (actu- ally 8 tax years). The election to amortize must be made on a timely tax return for the year in which the reforestation expenses were incurred. Elect to amortize reforestation expenses on Form 4562. (Passive owners may or may not be eligible for the amortization and credit). Here's how it works. Assume you spent $4,000 to reforest a cutover tract in 1 999. You claim a $400 tax credit (10 percent of $4,000) for 1999. You can also deduct 95 percent of these reforestation costs over the next 8 tax years. Due to a half-year convention you can only claim one-half of the annual amortizable portion for 1999. This means that on your 1 999 tax return you can deduct one-half of (0.95 X $4,000 -^ 7) or $27 1 . For the next 6 tax years you can deduct (0.95 x $4,000 - 7) or $543, and the remaining $27 1 can be deducted the 8th tax year. The annual reforestation amortization is claimed on Form 1040 on the line for adjustments rather than being claimed on Schedule A under miscellaneous deductions. (If you use Schedule A for this purpose, you can claim only aggregated miscellaneous deductions that exceed 2 percent of adjusted gross income). Use Form 3468 to claim the investment tax credit. Any reforestation costs exceeding the $10,000 annual limit must be capitalized (entered into your timber account). You can recover (deduct) these costs when you sell your timber. A final word of caution: the tax credit and 7-year amortization de- ductions are subject to recapture if you dispose of your trees — within 5 years of planting for the credit and within 10 years of planting for the amortization. Capital Gains and Self -employment Taxes If you report your timber sale income as ordinary income, you could pay significantly more in taxes than you would if you report it as a capital gain. Also, capital gains are not subject to the self-employ- ment tax, as is ordinary income. The net self-employment tax rate for 1999 is 15.3 percent for self-employment income of $400 or more. The rate consists of a 12.4 percent component for old age, survi- vors, and disability insurance (OASDI) and a 2.9 percent compo- nent for hospital insurance (Medicare). The maximum income sub- ject to the OASDI component of the tax rate is $72,600, while the Medicare component is unlimited. However, if wages subject to Social Security or Railroad Retirement tax are received during the tax year, the maximum is reduced by the amount of wages on which these taxes were paid. To qualify for long-term capital gains treat- ment, timber sold after December 31, 1997 must have been held longer than 12 months. The maximum long-term capital gams rate for 1999 is 20%. (For taxpayers in the lowest income bracket, the maximum rate is 10%). Cost-share Payments If you received cost-share assistance under one or more of the Federal or State cost-share programs during 1999, you may have to report some or all of it as ordinary income. You have several op- tions. You have the option to include it as income and then recover the part that you pay plus the cost-share payment through the amortization and reforestation tax credit already described. You also have the option to exclude the "excludable portion" from in- come if certain conditions are met. These conditions are ( 1 ) the cost-share program has to be approved for exclusion by the IRS and (2) the maximum amount excludable per acre is the greater of; (a) the present value of $2.50 per acre or (b) the present value of 1 0 percent of the average income per acre for the past 3 tax years. This second requirement gets rather complicated because you have to determine an appropriate interest rate to compute the present val- ues. Programs approved for exclusion by the IRS include the For- estry Incentives Program (FIP), the Forest Stewardship Incentive Program (SIP), the Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP), the Environ- mental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), and the Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program (WHIP), plus several State programs (check with your State Forestry Agency for approved programs in your State). Generally, if you harvested the tract within the last 3 years, prob- ably all of the cost-shares received can be excluded from income. In some cases, taxpayers may be better off to exclude cost-share pay- ments. Other taxpayers may be better off not to exclude cost-share payments. Instead, they may be better off to claim the cost-share payments as part of the reforestation tax credit/7-year amortization. The important point here is: You must report cost-share payments. If you decide to exclude cost-share payments, attach a statement to your return that states specifically what cost-share payments you received, that you choose to exclude some or all of them, and how Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 8 you determined the excludable amount. Conservation Reserve Program If you planted trees during 1999 under the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), you must report your annual payment as ordinary income. If you received CRP cost-share assistance funds for plant- ing your trees, you must also report these as ordinary income. CRP cost-share payments used to establish trees can be claimed as part of the reforestation expenses reported for the reforestation tax credit/ 7-year amortization. Farmers may treat expenditures for soil and water conservation on farmland as expenses in the year incurred, rather than capitalizing them (CRP expenditures qualify). However, the amount deductible in any year shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross income from farming. Casualty Losses A casualty loss must result from some event that is ( 1 ) identifiable, (2) damaging to property, and (3) sudden and unexpected or un- usual in nature. Examples include wildfire and storms. Generally, your claim for casualty losses can be no more than the adjusted basis minus any insurance or other compensation. The IRS has issued position statements on southern pine beetle losses in timber stands and drought losses of planted seedlings. In both cases, the IRS stated that, generally, neither circumstance qualified for casualty-loss deductions because they failed to meet the suddenness standard. It may be possible, however, to take a business- or investment-loss deduction for both types of damage. Management and Maintenance Expenses Generally, your annual expenses for the management and mainte- nance of an existing stand of timber can be expensed or capitalized. In most cases, you are better off to expense those costs during the tax year they are incurred, rather than capitalizing them. If it is not to your advantage to itemize deductions for 1999, you should capital- ize these expenses. If you choose to itemize deductions, you can deduct these expenses, but the passive loss rules apply. Conclusion Remember these points when you file your 1999 Federal income taxes: 1 . Decide if you are going to be an active or passive participant or an investor. Generally you will get the best tax advantage if you are active. 2. Establish your basis as soon as possible and keep good records! Records include a management plan and map, receipts for business transactions, diaries, and landowner meeting agendas. 3. If you had reforestation (timber stand establishment) costs, be sure to consider the 10 percent reforestation tax credit/7-year amor- tization. 4. If you sold timber during 1999, you maybe able to benefit from the long-term capital gains provisions because you do not have to pay self-employment tax on capital gains. 5. If you had cost-share assistance during 1999, you must report it to the IRS. You may choose to exclude some or all of it, if certain qualifications are met, but you still must report it. 6. If you participated in the CRP, your annual payments must be reported as ordinary income. Likewise, if you received CRP cost- share assistance funds, you must report them as ordinary income. 7. Proper tax planning is just as important as the management tech- niques to grow a profitable timber crop. For help, contact a profes- sional tax advisor, the Cooperative Extension Service, or your State forestry agency. EDITOR'S NOTE - If you have a question related to timber taxa- tion, we suggest you visit Purdue University's timber tax manage- ment web site. This is a comprehensive site that also includes links to all the necessary Federal and State income tax forms for use by forest landowners. The web site address is: http://www.&ir.purdue.edu/ttax/ Tri-State Forest Landowner Conference Scheduled for March, 2000 On Saturday, March 1 8, 2000, forest landowners who live in the IL- lA-WI tri-state area are invited to attend the 6th annual Tri-State Forest Stewardship Conference held at Sinsinawa Mound Confer- ence Center in Sinsinawa, WI. The conference program agenda is presented on the adjoining page of this newsletter. Landowners interested in attending may use the registration form at the bottom of the next page. Last year, over 550 people attended this confer- ence making it one of the largest forest landowner conferences in the nation. This year's program agenda makes the 2000 conference equally exciting and informative. The conference registration fee is $35.00 for the first registrant and $25.00 for each additional family member. The registration fee includes a continental breakfast, buf- fet luncheon, break refreshments, and a conference resource packet. Pre-registration is required. The registration deadline is March 1, 2000. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter Tri-State Forest Stewardship Conference Saturday, March 18, 2000 Sinsinawa Conference Center, Sinsinawa, WI Conference Program Agenda Preregistration Required - No Walk-in Registration) 7:30-8:30 a.m. Conference Check-in and Continental Breakfast 5:30-9: 1 5 a.m. Welcome and Conference Orientation. Keynote Address by Keith Argow, President, National Woodland Owners Association ):30-10:30a.m. Concurrent Session 1 I. "Alleycropping — An Agroforestry Alternative" I. "Directional Felling Techniques and Safe Chain Saw Use" (outdoors) "Exotics (Plants) — Coming to a Woodland Near You" "Mechanics of Tree Pruning" "Properties and Uses of Native-grown Hardwoods" "Identifying and Enhancing Wetlands on Your Property" 10:45-11:45 a.m. Concurrent Session 2 1 . "Nut Production — An Alternative Income Opportunity" I. "Successful Tree Planting" ). "Exotics (Plants) — Coming to a Woodland Near You" (repeat) 10. "Converting Your Trees Into Cash (Wood Products)" I I . "Discouraging Damage from Nusiance Wildlife" 1 2. "Recordkeeping for Forest Landowners" 12: 15-1 : 15 p.m. Concurrent Session 3 "Fine Hardwood Plantation Management" "Chain Saw Maintenance and Chain Sharpening" "Weed Control in Tree Plantations" "Forest Landowner Associations — The Importance of Belonging" 1 7. "Managing Your Land for Small Mammals" 1 8. "Portable Sawmill Demonstration" (outdoors) 1: 15-2:30 p.m. Buffet Luncheon 2:30-3:30 p.m. Concurrent Session 4 19. "Leased Hunting — An Alternative Income Opportunity" 20. "Crop Tree Identification and Management" 2 1 . "Understanding Basic Tree Physiology and Growth" 22. "Best Management Practices When Constructing Forest Roads and Trails" 23. "Recordkeeping for Forest Landowners" (repeat) 24. "How to Plan and Host Youth Field Days on Your Property' 3:45-4:45 p.m. Concurrent Session 5 25. "Growing Herbals — An Alternative Income Opportunity" 26. "Directional Felling Techniques and Safe Chain Saw Use (repeat, outdoors) 27. "Establishing Trees by Direct Seeding" 28. "Understanding Tree and Land Measurements" 29. "Discouraging Damage from Nuisance Wildlife" (repeat) 30. "Forest Landowner Associations — The Importance of Belonging" (repeat) 4:45 p.m. Adjourn I'm interested in attending the 2000 Tri-State Forest Stewardship Conference. Please send me registration information. Name: Address: City State Zip Return to: Judy Stoll, W-503 Turner Hall, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801; phone 217-333-3650. Registration Deadline: March 1,2000 Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 10 Ulinois Agncultural Sladstics Service ILLINOIS TIMBER PRICES PO Box 19283 Spnngficid IL 62794-9283 Ph (217) 492-1295 US Depanmenl of Agnculturc DIVISION OF FOREST RESOURCES 60<) Nonh Grand Avtnuc Vlea Spnngtield. IJIinois. 627Ub Phone (217)782-2361 DEPARTMENT Of NATURAL RESOURCES ZONE 2 PRICE REPORTING ZONES November 23. 1999 PRICES PAID ILLINOIS TIMBER PRODUCERS MAY 1999 THROUGH AUGUST 1999 SunuTier sawtimber prices paid to Illinois timber growers generally showed mixed trends for FOB. Mill and stumpaee compared to both the prc\'ious winter and summer Of the timber buyers reporting volume of their 1999 operations, 48% indicated their volume was 500 thousand board feet or more. This report is prepared by the Illinois Agricultural Statistics Service in cooperation with the Ulinois Division of Forest Resources Unless otherwise indicated, pnces shown in this report are pnces reported by licensed timber buyers The cooperation of those timber buyers who participated in the survey is greatly appreciated ZONE 1 Illinois is divided into three price-reporting zones, based on timber resources, similarity, utilization standards and praaices and soil types. Zone I is the Southern Unit; 2U)ne 2. the Claypan Umt. and Zone 3. the Praine Umt. Ranges of prices for each zone are shown on the back of this report This report can be used only as a general giude for deiemumng market value of timber General market and econotmc conditions are the major pnce- detemuning faaors. Certain local considerations such as accessibility, site and terrain, distance to market, size of sale, and tree size and quality also a£fect the price paid. For techiucal. marketing or management assistance, contaa your local State Forester, or the Division of Forest Resources. Illinois E>epartment of Natural Resources. 600 North Grand Avenue. West. Springfield. Illinois 62706 AVERAGE PRICES FOR STUMP AGE AND FOB. IN SELECTED PERIODS SAWTIMBER - $ PER M BD FT. May 1998 - August 1998 November 1998 - February 1999 May 1999 - August 1999 SPECIES Stumpage FOB Mill Stumpage FOB. Mill Stumpage FOB Mill Ash 160 310 160 300 160 270 Basswood 90 210 100 250 110 200 Beech 70 160 80 200 75 170 Cottonwood 60 160 55 160 65 150 Sweet Gum 80 180 80 180 75 180 Elm & Hackbeny 70 180 75 180 75 180 Hickorv 80 220 100 240 no 200 Soft Maple 120 240 100 240 110 200 Sugar Maple 190 300 160 320 170 280 Black Oak 170 310 170 300 160 260 Pin Oak 85 180 85 200 95 180 Red Oak 260 410 220 360 230 360 White Oak 250 390 220 360 230 350 Yellow Poplar 130 230 140 280 120 290 Sycamore 70 180 70 170 80 180 Black Walnut 350 480 350 510 330 500 Woods Run Bottomland 100 210 100 210 90 190 Wood: Run Upland ISO 270 150 250 150 260 FACE VENEER - $ PER M BD FT Red Oak 530 890 480 920 610 910 White Oak 820 1,530 970 1.660 1,010 1,670 Walnut 1.550 2.780 1.390 1.940 1,720 3.120 COOPERAGE - $ PER M BD FT 1 White Oak 1 300 580 1 280 450 1 290 550 1 UNPEELED PULPWOOD - $ PER TON 1 Ton 1 3.20 1970 1 3.00 1950 1 300 2100 1 Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 11 Timber Pnces May 1999- August 1999 November 23. 1999 MOST COMMONLY REPORTED PRICES PAID ILLINOIS TIMBER PRODUCERS | Mav 1999 -August 1999 PRODUCT UNIT Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 StumtwKe F.O B. Mill Stumpage FOB MiU Stumpage FOB Mill I Sawtimber Dollars Ash Mbd-ft. 100-200 190-400 70-300 180-400 50-300 150-350 Basswood Mbd-ft. 75-100 150-190 70-90 150-200 50-200 150-500 Beech Mbdft. 50-100 170-200 N/A 140-160 50 120-160 Cottonwood Mbd-ft. 50-80 130-200 50-100 140-200 50 100-160 Sweet Gum Mbd. ft. 50-100 170-230 60-80 140-180 50 120-160 Elm & Hackberrv Mbdft. 50-100 140-230 60-100 140-200 50-70 120-250 Hickory Mbd. ft. 70-150 190-250 50-220 150-300 50-100 120-170 Soft Maple Mbd. ft. 50-100 150-300 50-150 160-280 70-200 150-250 Sugar Maple Mbdft. 100-200 190-450 60-300 180-400 150-300 160-325 Black Oak Mbdft. 100-200 190-400 60-300 180-450 50-250 160-250 PmOak Mbdft. 50-100 170-230 60-200 140-200 50-150 120-200 Red Oak Mbdft. 100-300 190-550 85-350 180-500 40-350 160-500 White Oak Mbd. ft. 100-250 190-500 80-500 180-500 150-400 160-550 Yellow Poplar Mbdft. 100-200 200^00 130-150 250-300 50 N/A Sycamore Mbd. ft. 50-100 150-200 50-150 160-200 50 120-250 Black Walnut Mbd. ft. 200-250 250-500 200-500 600-650 250-500 400-950 Woods Run Bottombnd Mbdft. 60-120 160-230 50-120 190-200 25-150 120-175 Woods Run Upland Mbdft. 90-200 180-450 60-200 180-330 125-350 250 STATEWIDE | Stumpage FOB Mill 2 Face Veneer Red Oak Mbd. ft 400-850 600-1.400 White Oak Mbd. ft. 500-1.750 1.200-2.265 Walnut Mbd. ft. 1.000-3.000 2,200^,050 3. Coooeraee White Oak Mbdft. 150-400 300-800 4 Pulpwood Unpeeled Mbd. ft 2.00-4 00 20.00-22.00 LOG SCALES USED BY REPORTING BUYERS | Scale Percent Using Doyle 100 Scribner - International - CUSTOM SAWING BY THOSE REPORTING | Region Percent Rated Reported Reporting $/M bd. ft. Zone 1 13 150-190 Zone 2 26 120-300 Zone 3 14 200 Illinois 19 120-300 VOLUME OF 1997 OPERATIONS Size m (000) bd. ft. Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 All % % % % 1 - 100 - 24 58 26 100-500 31 24 25 26 500 - 1.000 15 19 17 17 1,000-3.000 54 9 - 20 3.000 + - 24 - 11 Cooperage is the manufacture of barrels. Face veneer is logs cut into thin sheets or 'Veneer" used mostly by fiimiture builders. Pultwood is used in making paper, fiberboard and similar products. M bd. ft. means thousand board feet. Sawtimber refers to logs that are cut into lumber or timbers. FOB, refers to the price paid for timber delivered to the mill MARKED TIMBER SALES - MAY 1999 - AUGUST 1999 STATEWIDE STUMPAGE Woods Run Upland $102-$341/M bd ft. Woods Run Bottomland Insufficient Reports ♦Prices supplied to Distria Foresters by seller, may include some veneer. Garry D. Kepley, State Statistician "Printed by authority of the State of Illinois, Tom Pordugal, Rick Kestle, Agricultural Sutisticians 11/23/99, 1,700,2391 Illinois Forest Management Newsletter University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign U of I Extension Newsletter Service 528 Bevier Hall 905 S. Goodwin Ave. Urbana, IL 61801 Return Service Requested Ag Library Serials Clerk 225 Mumford Hall 1301 W Gregory Dr CAMPUS MAIL MC-710 12/31/00 -V ' . " Lip m LNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS EXTENSION ffif L 1 9 2000 I '^ -^'ibrary ILLINOIS FOREST MANAGEMENT A Biannual Newsletter for Illinois Landowners Volume 1,2000 No. 38 IN TfflS ISSUE Pagel Asian Longhorned Beetle Page 4 Financial Maturity: A Guide To When Trees Should Be Harvested Page 12 Establishing Your Basis After The Fact Page 13 New Forest Landowner Web Site Announcement Page 14 Illinois Timber Prices *• '*' *^ 'w '■^\Wt'" •• Asian Longhorned Beetle, us Forest Strvicc NE Area S&PF DUnois Forest Management Newsletter is produced by the Uni- versity of Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Environ- mental Sciences and University of Illinois Extension. Our newslet- ter features information from many sources to help you make in- formed decisions concerning your woodland resources. We en- courage your questions and comments which we will share with our readers as space permits. Direct your inquiries to: Editor, IFM Newsletter, W-503 Turner Hall, 1 102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. Photo by James Appleby, Univ. of Dlinois AS7A^ IONQU0HN6V 866716 The First Real Threat to America's Forests In the xist CentnrjrT A potential serious insect enemy of America's hardwood forests poses the first major threat of the 2 1 ^ century. The Asian longhorned beede [ALB] (Anoplophora glabripennis) has arrived from China where this beetle is a serious pest of hardwood trees and has few natural enemies. In the United States, it has no natural enemies. It is beheved to have arrived in the U.S. through infected durmage imported from Asia. Populations of this insect first became noticed in Brooklyn, NY in 1996 and have spread to warehouse and resi- dential sites in 14 states around the country. The Chicago metro area has three confirmed ALB sites (Ravens wood community in the city of Chicago, DuPage County near Addison, and the Village of Summit) and strict quarantine has been placed on these areas to help prevent the beetle from spreading. APHIS (US DA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service) has determined that the beetle is hitchhiking its way into the United States in solid wood packing State - County - Local Groups - U.S. Department of Agricultm^ Cooperating University of Illinois Extension Provides Equal Opportunities in Programs and Employment materials, such as pallets and crates, from infested areas of China. Similarly, infested wood that is harvested here and transported to other locations is spreading the beetle. Why is ALB a Serious Threat to America's Hardwood Forests? As far as is known, ALB, so far, remains a threat to urban and city forests since this is where it was first introduced in shipping mate- rials at warehouses. However, the beetle could quickly spread to woodland areas if infested wood is transported to other areas or adult beetles are inadvertently transported to rural forested areas. Infested areas in China where beetle populations pose a serious threat have climate conditions very similar to the US's eastern hard- wood forest region. As mentioned above, ALB has no known natural enemies in the U.S. And, because the insects spend all but the summer months inside the tree, it is virtually impossible to eradicate them with insecticides. The only way to eradicate the beetle is to remove and destroy infested trees. Removal of suscep- tible trees in the immediate vicinity of the infested trees as a buffer is also recommended in certain situations. This is similar to how oak wilt infection is handled in woodland situations. Since there are no know natural enemies of this beetle, if it becomes estabhshed, it could quickly explode into a major problem for forest landowners. ALB spread quickly when they get into an area with suitable host trees. In the U.S., the beetle prefers maple species (Acer sp.) including boxelder. Norway, red, silver, sugar and sy- camore maples. Other knows hosts are horsechestnut, black lo- cust, elms, birches, willows, poplars, mulberry, and green ash. It may attack other hardwoods as well, but limited experience with the beetle in the U.S. has resource managers worried. Since sugar maple is one of the most valuable trees in the eastern United States and the major species tapped for the commercial production of maple syrup, the threat to our forests is very real. Hard maple wood, especially in the birds-eye or curly form, is highly pnzed for furniture, paneling, flooring, and many other uses. Typically, ALB attacks a single tree at first eating until they exhaust it as a food source. Then they spread to nearby trees. Under its own power, this beetle can fly hundreds of feet. With wind assis- tance, it can go even further. Landowners and homeowners unin- tentionally spread the beetle by cutting or trimming and infested tree and removing the wood elsewhere. What Other Than Destroying Infested Trees is Effective? APHIS is planning to conduct field test to determine whether the systemic insecticide, imidacloprid (its commercial name is Merit® 75WP) will be useful in stopping the spread of the ALB. Prelimi- nary testing of systemic insecticides against wood-boring insects in China has warranted the U.S. field tests by APHIS. Imidacloprid has shown promise for effective use in an operational program. Preliminary testing indicates some activity of imidacloprid against adult beetles as they feed on small twigs and possibly when the female beetles chew into the bark and phloem area to deposit their eggs. Systemic insecticides usually work by making the treated plant either unpalatable to the target pest or poisonous. Imidacloprid is effective in controlling some beetles. The insecticide works by interfering with the beetle's nervous system resulting in its paraly- sis and eventual death. APHIS plans to evaluate the delivery of this insecticide into the tree by soil injection and trunk injection. The question has already been posed on what affect a systemic insecticide might have on sap collected for maple syrup produc- tion. Effects on such trees would certainly have to be evaluated and studied before they were treated in this manner. There are no plans at this time to treat or evaluate commercial maple trees. Test- ing is limited to the infested areas in New York and Chicago. One natural enemy of ALB is entomopathogenic nematodes and could become an effective control agent. Testing has shown the ALB mortality reached 6 1 -94% when infected with various strains of Steinemema bibionis (Qin et al., 1988). What is the Life Cycle of the ALB? The typical life cycle of this beetle is: Egg — Larva — Pupa — Adult Let's look at each of these life stages a little closer. Adult Stage Asian longhomed beetles are big, showy insects that are readily recognized by their antennae (or 'horns'). The adult beetles are % -inch to 1 Vi -inches in length and a Va -inch to Vi -inch in width. The females are larger than the males. Their color is jet-black with a glossy sheen and they have distinctive white dots on their back. Their antennae have 1 1 segments. The base of antennae is whitish with a blue-black color. The antennae of the male beetle are 2.5 times their body length; the antennae of the females are 1.3 times the body length. Their feet have a bluish tinge. James ApplebyAJniv. of IL Illinois Forest Management Newsletter USDA APHIS ^^ USFS NE AREA S&PF -NC IL DcpL of Agriculture James Appleby/Univ. of IL Egg Stage Female beetles are capable of laying 50-70 eggs. Females chew an oviposition depression into the bark of the tree and deposit one egg per depression in the phloem area. The eggs are off-white in color and roughly a 14 - inch in length. Both ends of the eggs are slightly concave. Bark removed showing one ALB egg James Appleby/Univ. of IL Larval Stage Mature larvae are 2-inches in length. Its immense size makes it is easy to see why it is so destructive once larvae get established in a tree. The prothorax has a brown mark. The front of the mark does not have a brown margin. Life stages of ALB: egg, larval instars, pupa, and adult Larva and Larvae Damage James Appleby/Univ. of IL Pupal Stage Pupae are off-white and are 1 Va -inch in length and 3/8 -inch in width. ^&J#%Jj ■■jJsj»;^ ?vScF*vif>!) D' K 30 *2 \ iiMii.MiMMi&6aacalata^^ ^ 5C' m SIC Figure 1. Comparison of flnancial and biological maturity for a hypothetical tree. In contrast, the biological maturity of a tree or a stand of trees occurs when the tree or stand achieves maximum merchantable volume. Financial maturity differs from biological maturity by im- posing economic and business management constraints on the production process. In determining financial maturity, benefits are weighed against costs. The benefits are the marketable values, while the costs include capital charges and expenses. If the finan- cial maturity concept is adopted as a management guide, trees and stands are normally harvested at a point in time prior to their bio- logical maturity (Figure 1). Usually the point of financial maturity and biological maturity will be equal only if costs are zero and the owner's alternative rate of return is zero. 3 Information Requirements The Alternative Rate of Return It is necessary that the "proper" alternative rate of return be deter- mined. It is the rate earned by the investor's best alternative invest- ment. One way for a woodland owner to estimate his alternative rate of return is to review present and future investment opportuni- ties. For example, someone investing money in a Certificate of De- posit for 5 years at 10% is providing a guide to his alternative rate of return. If another available investment is the improvement of cropland through drainage, and the expected return is 15%, this would also provide an indication of alternative investment oppor- tunities. Likewise, the cost to an individual in borrowing money provides a similar guide. A tree or stand earning less might be subject to liquidation with the money used to repay a loan or to be reinvested after fully considering the comparable risks, uncertain- ties, and length of investment period. The rate may vary from time to time in accordance with the owner's appraisal of his financial circumstances. In summary, the "required" return (the alternative rate of return) is the rate of return a person will need to economically justify an investment in a given type of asset. If the yield from an asset fails to meet this expectation, the rational decision is to liquidate the exist- ing capital asset and to reinvest the proceeds in another form of capital, earning a rate of return equivalent to or greater than the "required" rate. Expected Incremental Changes in Tree Value Trees increase in value in three principal ways. As trees grow, they increase in volume and, consequently, in the amount of wood which has merchantable value. They may also improve in quality as the knotty cores are buried under clear layers of annual growth. Changes in quality are reflected in the increased market price per unit volume of standing timber and cut products. The value of trees may also increase over time relative to other goods and services in the economy as a consequence of market scarcity or changing Illinois Forest Management Newsletter Table 1. Present and future size and value of the sample white oak. Time Value from Log Purdue Log vol\ime Value per Value per Value per growth present dbh length log grade Doyle rule board ft . dollars or dollars tree dollars percent percent years inches feet designation board ft. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (5x6-7) Sum 7-8 (9) 0 14.2 16 2 48 .109 5.23 16 3 27 .088 2.38 7.61 2.52 5 14.6 16 54 .109 5.89 16 3 31 .088 2.73 8.62 2.41 10 15.1 16 2 60 .109 6.54 16 3 36 .088 3.17 9.71 8.32 15 16.0 8 16 1 2 46 48 .159 .109 7.31 5.23 8 3 22 .088 L 94 14.48 3.85 20 16.8 8 16 1 2 56 57 .159 .109 8.90 6.21 8 3 27 .088 2.38 17.49 25 17.6 16 8 2 93 32 .159 .109 14.79 3.49 8 3 27 .088 2.38 20.66 2.06 30 18.0 16 16 1 100 64 .159 .109 15.90 6.98 22.88 A Specific Case *When should a white oak tree, presently 14.2" dbh, be harvested if the owner's alternative rate of return is 7%? *Should the tree be cut now or allowed to grow? *Is the tree paying its way compared to other investments avail- able to the owner? To respond to these questions, the tree's pros- pects for growth and changes in quality must be appraised. Such an assessment for a hypothetical tree covering the next 30 years is shown in Table 1. To simplify the analysis, only the implicit cost of holding inventory is considered. Property taxes, management, and other explicit costs chargeable to an individual tree are minimal and can be safely ignored. The calculated value growth percents (Table 1, Column 9) are the compound interest rates which equate the beginning tree values with the future tree values in the five-year time periods indicated. Since all other costs except holding costs have been assumed to be negligible, a relatively simple formula can be used to calculate the value growth percent: 8 VGP = [FV]'^l/t-l [PV] where VGP = Value Growth Percent PV = Beginning Tree Value FV = Ending Tree Value t = Number of Years Between Estimated Tree Values As an example, to calculate the VGP between 10 and 15 years: VGP= 14.48 ^1/5-1 9.71 VGP= 1.49124 ^1/5-1 VGP =1.0832-1 VGP =.0832 or 8.32% 9 Since the owner's alternative rate of return is 7%, the point of finan- cial maturity would occur later, and the decision to cut would be postponed until that time when the VGP declines to the owner's Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 8 alternative rate of return. If the owner's alternative rate of return is greater than 8.32%, test the next time interval to see if VGP is increasing or decreasing. If it is decreasing, then the tree should be harvested unless there are non-economic factors that need to be considered. Application The concepts and procedures outlined above can assist landowners in deciding whether or not to cut target trees. The example which was used analyzed prospective returns and implicit costs during five-year periods. The principles can also be apphed on a year-to-year basis. In other words, it is not necessary to make growth and value projections over extended periods of time. However, the assistance of a forester in estimating values and prospective growth may be desirable whatever the owner's planning horizon. Guidance in obtaining the help of foresters is found in Purdue University Extension publication FNR-87 "Forestry and Wildlife Management Assistance Available to Indiana Woodland Owners: Providers and Programs." Guidelines based on the financial maturity concept published by Trimble, et a!. (1974) provide the basic elements for selecting trees that should be harvested (Table 2). These guidelines are influenced by both silvicul- tural and financial maturity concepts and provide a good balance between the two. Note that at lower alternative rates of return (2 to 5%), trees growing on good sites (10), e.g.. Site 80, may have larger diameters (dbh) at financial maturity than those trees growing on poorer sites. Financial Maturity of Even- Aged Stand The General Case In even-aged stands managed for timber production, the length of rotation (number of years between planting and harvesting) may be determined by using the financial maturity concept. The basic value growth percent method used in the case of an individual tree will be employed again. Since stands are groups of individual trees, determining financial maturity for a stand involves the same factors used in the analysis of individual trees; however, these factors are aggregated into one average value for the stand. Figure 2 also characterizes stand growth and the phenomena which were described earlier for individual trees also occur in stands. Table 2. Diameter limits for harvesting sawlog trees at different alternative rates of return. Mark trees of these dbh classes and larger; Low Medi um High Species 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 80 70 60 80 70 60 80 70 60 80 70 60 80 70 60 Yellow poplar 26 26 24 24 22 22 20 18 18 20 18 18 18 18 18 Beech 24 22 22 22 20 20 20 18 18 20 18 18 18 18 18 Black cherry 32 30 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 20 20 18 18 18 18 Red maple 32 30 30 28 26 24 22 22 18 20 20 18 18 18 18 White ash 30 28 28 26 24 24 22 20 18 20 20 18 18 18 18 Sugar maple 32 32 30 28 28 24 22 22 18 20 20 18 18 18 18 Red oak 26 26 24 24 24 22 22 22 20 22 20 20 20 18 18 White oak 24 22 20 22 20 20 20 18 18 20 18 18 18 18 18 Chestnut oak 24 24 22 22 22 20 20 18 18 20 18 18 18 18 18 Other long-lived 26 24 24 24 22 20 20 18 20 20 18 18 18 18 18 species Trees to mark- -sawlo g.sizes (above 1 1 .0 inches dbh) For All Rate-of-Retum Classes, Mark: 1. Culls and near culls. 2. Trees with significant rot in the butt log. 3. Very low-vigor trees (vigor 4). 4. Extremely rough trees with butt-log grade 5. trees over 15 inches with butt-log grade 4. 5. Any In addition, trees above a certain dbh class are marked under certain conditions. This dbh varies with the rate of return desired, by species, and, in the case of oak, by site quality. It also varies by crown or vigor class and is additionally affected by the like- lihood of log-grade improvement. The trees to mark are those of the indicated dbh's and larser. These will be Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 8 alternative rate of return. If the owner's alternative rate of return is greater than 8.32%, test the next time interval to see if VGP is increasing or decreasing. If it is decreasing, then the tree should be harvested unless there are non-economic factors that need to be considered. Application The concepts and procedures outlined above can assist landowners in deciding whether or not to cut target trees. The example which was used analyzed prospective returns and implicit costs during five-year periods. The principles can also be applied on a year-to-year basis. In other words, it is not necessary to make growth and value projections over extended periods of time. However, the assistance of a forester in estimating values and prospective growth may be desirable whatever the owner's planning horizon. Guidance in obtaining the help of foresters is found in Purdue University Extension publication FNR-87 "Forestry and Wildlife Management Assistance Available to Indiana Woodland Owners: Providers and Programs." Guidelines based on the financial maturity concept published by Trimble, et a!. (1974) provide the basic elements for selecting trees that should be harvested (Table 2). These guidelines are influenced by both silvicul- tural and financial maturity concepts and provide a good balance between the two. Note that at lower alternative rates of return (2 to 5%), trees growing on good sites (10), e.g., Site 80, may have larger diameters (dbh) at financial maturity than those trees growing on poorer sites. Financial Maturity of Even-Aged Stand The General Case In even-aged stands managed for timber production, the length of rotation (number of years between planting and harvesting) may be determined by using the financial maturity concept. The basic value growth percent method used in the case of an individual tree will be employed again. Since stands are groups of individual trees, determining financial maturity for a stand involves the same factors used in the analysis of individual trees; however, these factors are aggregated into one average value for the stand. Figure 2 also characterizes stand growth and the phenomena which were described earlier for individual trees also occur in stands. Table 2. Diameter limits for harvesting sawlog trees at different alternative rates of return. Mark trees of these dbh classes and larger; Low Medium 3% 4% 80 70 60 80 70 60 Species 2% 80 70 60 Yellow poplar 26 26 24 Beech 24 22 22 Black cherry 32 30 30 Red maple 32 30 30 White ash 30 28 28 Sugar maple 32 32 30 Red oak 26 26 24 White oak 24 22 20 Chestnut oak 24 24 22 Other long-lived species 26 24 24 5% 80 70 60 20 18 18 20 18 18 20 20 18 20 20 18 20 20 18 20 20 18 22 20 20 20 18 18 20 18 18 High 6% 80 70 60 24 22 22 22 20 20 28 26 24 28 26 24 26 24 24 28 28 24 24 24 22 22 20 20 22 22 20 24 22 20 20 18 20 Trees to mark — sawlog. sizes (above 1 1 .0 inches dbh) 20 18 18 20 18 18 22 20 18 22 22 18 22 20 18 22 22 18 22 22 20 20 18 18 20 18 18 20 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 20 18 18 18 18 For All Rate-of-Retum Classes, Mark: 1. Culls and near culls. 2. Trees with significant rot in the butt log. 3. Very low-vigor trees (vigor 4). 4. Extremely rough trees with butt-log grade 5. trees over 15 inches with butt-log grade 4. 5. Any In addition, trees above a certain dbh class are marked under certain conditions. This dbh varies with the rate of return desired, by species, and, in the case of oak, by site quality. It also varies by crown or vigor class and is additionally affected by the like- lihood of log-grade improvement. The trees to mark are those of the indicated dbh's and larger. These will be Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 6. Any short-lived species, such as black locust, sassafras, and butternut, unless they are unusually vigorous. marked unless a potential grade improvement can be fore- seen in the next 10 years. Source: Trimble et a 1. (1974), p. 12. A Specific Case * When should a 40 year-old, even-aged stand of upland oaks be harvested if the owner's alternative rate of return is 6%? * Should the stand be cut or allowed to grow? * Is the stand paying its way compared to other investments avail- able to the owner? To respond to these questions, the stand's prospects for growth and impending changes in quality must be appraised. The stand's future expenses must be estimated, also. Estimates of these items covering the next 25 years are shown in Table 3. The VGP is calcu- lated similarly to the VGP for individual trees, except that intermedi- ate revenues and periodic explicit costs will enter into the calcula- tion. The value growth percents, including the intermediate values, are calculated by the formula. 1 1 For example, to calculate the VGP for the period 5 to 10 years in the future using data from Table 3 and a 6% alternative rate of return: Substituting these values into the formula, the formula reads: Com- pleting the operations: In the example given, the point of financial maturity comes in the 20 to 25 year period because the VGP equals and then falls below 6% in this period. In other words, to maintam a rate of return of 6% on assets, it is necessary to harvest the stand in this period and re-invest in an alternative investment, such as savings accounts, or re-establish a new stand of trees. Application To estimate financial maturity for a stand, estimate present and future stand values in 5 or 10 years. Next estimate any intermediate periodic costs or revenues which will be associated with the wood- lands during this period. Annual constant or almost constant cost may be ignored. 12 An example of periodic revenues may be from Table 3. Values costs and revenues for a forty-year-old even-aged stand of upland oaks. Time Gross Discounted Value from Volume Value total Intermediate Costs Revenues Future Present growth present per acre per bd. ft. value Costs Revenues (Cnx DFm) (Rm x DFm) value value percent years bd. ft. dollars percent (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) 0 611 .0965 58.96 58.96 4 10 7.92 6.72 5 717 .1096 78.58 78.58 78.58 7 10 8.90 24.52 8 15 12.59 10 2061 .1177 242.58 242.58 242.58 12 30 26.70 8.73 15 3M1 .1258 382.56 382.56 382.56 20 4087 .1353 552.97 552.97 552.97 7.65 531 25 5115 .1400 716.10 716.10 the selling of firewood or from a commercial thinning. Select your alternative rate of return. Now enter the estimated values and intermediate costs and revenues into the formula for VGP for even-aged stands, and calculate the VGP. If it is greater than the alternative rate of return, maintain the stand for the number of years in the period examined. If the VGP is less than the alternative rate of return and the trees to be harvested are of sawlog size, harvest the stand. Calculations of VGP for young, non-merchantable stands will not yield acceptable rales of return just as new businesses or manufacturing processes take time to begin operating on a profitable basis. Therefore, harvesting a stand before merchantability is reached may reduce the total wealth of the owner. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 10 Income Tax Implication Up to now the effect of income taxes has been ignored so as to not complicate the basic idea of financial maturity. In general, the inclu- sion of income tax expenses in the calculation of value growth percent for individual trees as described herein will not materially change financial maturity. It is, therefore, recommended that in- come taxes be ignored along with other explicit costs in these cases. However, the same is not always true when considering the finan- cial maturity of tree stands. Because some expenses may be re- duced by itemized deductions, the effect of income taxes is to shorten the time a stand will be held when all other things are held constant. As the number of periodic deductible expense increases and as your personal income tax rises, the influence of income taxes be- comes more significant. For example, if you are in a low-income bracket or have few expenses, the calculation of after-tax financial maturity is not recommended If your tax rate is high and many expenses are incurred in the woodlands, after-tax analysis may be worthwhile. Summary Procedures and guidelines are presented which will assist wood- land owners in determining whether or not to harvest individual trees or stands if income maximization is an objective. These proce- dures and guidelines are based on the individual owner's invest- ment alternatives. The suggested methods help insure that the woodland owner will receive his expected and desired rate of return on the investments, if not, the owner should cut the timber and either reestablish new woods or convert the land to another more profitable investment. The VGP method recommended will provide reliable estimates of financial maturity if accurate estimates of present and future tree value are made. These estimates of tree value will be influenced by site, species, and the tree's unique growth rate. The guidelines in Table 2 must be used with the knowledge that the individual tree's unique growth rate has been considered only by averaging the growth of many trees. Therefore, some trees may have diameters at financial maturity which are lower or higher than the diameters suggested. Finally, if tree prices are expected to rise or fall relative to all other commodities, the point of financial maturity will lengthen or shorten, respecfively. This may be incorporated in the VGP method by in- creasing or decreasing the relative prices used to evaluate the vol- ume of timber and proceeding to calculate VGP as described. Sources of Additional Information Estimating Tree Volume and Log Quality FNR 4. How to Make and Use the Tree Measuring Stick, W. L. Fix. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service Publication. Financial Maturity Concepts Bentley, William R. and Dennis E. Teegarden. 1965. "Financial Ma- turity: A Theoretical Review," Forest Science, Volume 1 1 :7687. DeBald, Paul S. and Joseph Mendel. 1976 An Individual-tree Ap- proach to Making Stand Evaluation. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE- 336, 13 p. Duerr, William A., John Fedkiw, and Sam Guttenburg. 1956. Finan- cial Maturity: A Guide to Profitable Timber Growing. USDA Agri- cultural Technical Bulletin 11 46, 75 p. illus. Gaffney, M. Mason. 1957. Concepts of Financicl Maturity of timber and other assets. A.E. Information Series No. 62, North Carolina State College. Raleigh. 105 p. Grisez, Ted J. and Joseph Mendel. 1 972. The Rate of value Increase for Black Cherry, Red Maple, and White Ash. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-23 1 , 26 p. Mendel, Joseph J., Ted J. Grisez and G. R. Trimble, Jr. 1973. The Rate of Value Increase for Sugar Maple. USDA Forest Service Research PaperNE-250, 19p. Paul S. DeBald and Martin W. Dale. 1976. Tree Value Con- version Standards for Hardwood Sawtimber. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-337. 74 p. illus. Trimble, George R., Jr., Joseph J. Mendel and Richard A. Kennell. 1974. A Procedure for Selection Marking in Hardwoods Combining Silvicultural Considerations with Economic Guidelines. USDA For- est Service Research Paper NE-292. 1 3 p. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 11 APPENDIX TABLE 1 . PRESENT VALUE OF $ 1 .00 RECIEVED IN YEAR N (DISCOUNTING) INTEREST RATES N 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 1 .9901 .9804 .9709 .9615 .9524 .9434 .9346 .9259 .9174 .9091 2 .9803 .9612 .9426 .9246 .9070 .8900 .8734 .8573 .8417 .8264 3 .9706 .9423 .9151 .8890 .8638 .8396 .8163 .7938 .7722 .7513 4 .9610 .9238 .9-85 .8548 .8227 .7921 .7629 .7350 .7084 .6830 5 .9515 .905? .8626 .8219 .7835 .7473 .7130 .6806 .6499 .6209 6 .9420 .8880 .3375 .7903 .7462 .7050 .6663 .6302 .5963 .5645 7 .9327 .8706 .8131 .7599 .7107 .6651 .6227 .5835 .5470 .5132 8 .9235 .8535 .7894 .7307 .6768 .6274 .5820 .5439 .5019 .4665 9 .9143 .8368 .7664 .7026 .6446 .5919 .5439 .5002 .4804 .4241 10 .9053 .8203 .7441 .6756 .6139 .5584 .5083 .4632 .4224 .3855 11 .8963 .8043 .7224 .6496 .5847 .5268 .4751 .4289 .3875 .3505 12 .8874 .7885 .7014 .6246 .5568 .4970 .4440 .3971 .3555 .3186 13 .8787 .7730 .6810 .6006 .5303 .4688 .4150 .3677 .3262 .2897 14 .8700 .7579 .6611 .5775 .5051 .4423 .3878 .3405 .2992 .2633 15 .8613 .7430 .6419 .5553 .4810 .4173 .3624 .3152 .2745 .2394 16 .8528 .7284 .6232 .5339 .4581 .3936 .3387 .2919 .2519 .2176 17 .8444 .7142 .6050 .5134 .4363 .7714 .3166 .2703 .2311 .1978 18 .8360 .7002 .5874 .4936 .4155 .3503 .2959 .2502 .2120 .1799 19 .8277 .6864 .5703 .4746 .3957 .3305 .2765 .2317 .1945 .1635 20 .8195 .6730 .5637 .4564 .3769 .3118 .2584 .2145 .1784 .1486 25 .7798 .6095 .4776 .3751 .2953 .2330 .1842 .1460 .1160 .0923 30 .7419 .5521 .4120 .3083 .2314 .1741 .1314 .0994 .0754 .0573 35 .7059 .5000 .3354 .2534 .1613 .1301 .0937 .0676 .0490 .0356 40 .6717 .4529 .3066 .2083 .1420 .0972 .0668 .0460 .0318 .0221 45 .6391 .4102 .2644 .1712 .1113 .0727 .0476 .0313 .0207 .0137 50 .6080 .3715 .2281 .1407 .0872 .0543 .0339 .0213 .0134 .0085 55 .5785 .3365 .1968 .1157 .0683 .0406 .0242 .0145 .0087 .0053 60 .5504 .3048 .1697 .0951 .0535 .0303 .0173 .0099 .0057 .0033 RR9/93 Footnotes 1 See Chapman, H. H. &W. H. Meyers, 1947. Forest Volootion. New York. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. or Johnston, R. W., J 970. Capitol Budgeting Belmont, California. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc. for a discussion of net present worth and internal rate of return. 2 Proof of this statement and derivation of formulas used in this publi- cation can be obtained by writing Dr J. C. Callahan, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. 3. Robert W. Koenig, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry, suggested the following "unusual " case for a single black walnut tree. In 1959, the Hougham family had a standing offer of $2,500 for a very old and large black walnut tree. The family held the tree until 1965, at which time it sold for $12,600. The tree was 35.5 inches, contained an estimated 2,259 bd. ft. of merchantable volume, and was about 150 years old. The tree had reached biological maturity since a small hole was discovered in the butt log, causing some loss of merchantable volume. If the concept of financial maturity had called for cutting the tree in 1965, the tree might have been both financially and biologically mature with an alternative rate of return greater than zero. The situation surround- ing the marketing of this tree was unique The tree sold at $5.33 per bd. ft., while the average price of the best and largest black walnuts Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 12 sold in Indiana during 1965 was only $.85 per bd. ft. 4 Refer to Footnote 2. 5 For the mathematically inclined, the graph in Figure 2 represents a bimodal discounted net revenue distribution. The assumption made is that the first mode or maximum is the global maximum. 6 Value growth percent is explained in detail in the next section. 7 The value growth percent is analogous to calculating the marginal revenues for any productive process. Equating VGP and the alternative rate of return is analogous to equating marginal cost to marginal revenue. 8 Refer to Footnote 2. 9 Many pocket calculators are now "programmed" to provide nth root calculations Logarithmic tables can also be used to obtain nth roots. 10 Site is a measure of productivity which includes climatic, soil, and topographic factors. It is commonly measured as the height of the dominant and co-dominant trees on a site at age 50 or 100 years. 11 Refer to Footnote 2. 12 Refer to Footnote 3. Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture and Home Economics, State of Indiana, Purdue University and U.S. Department of Agricul- ture Cooperating. H.A. Wadsworth, Director, West Lafayette, IN. Issued in furtherance of the Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914. It is the policy of the Cooperative Extension Service of Purdue University that all persons shall have equal opportunity and access to our programs and facilities. Reprinted from Woodland Management Publication FNR-91, Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service. I ESTABLISHING YOUR BASIS AFTER THE FACT by Bill Hoover Not knowing your timber's basis puts you at a financial disadvan- tage. Even if financial gain isn't your primary reason for being a forest landowner or Tree Farmer, you should know your basis. If you haven't determined the basis of your timber yet, please read on. Don't let the apparent lack of precision inherent inthe process make you uneasy. The sooner it's done, the easier it is to do. Basis is the book value of your timber. It's used to determine gain or loss on timber sales, condemnations, and the amount of casualty losses. Without a basis, you'll pay tax on all your timber income and won't have a causalty-loss deduction. Please don't mix the issues of capital gains and basis, however. Knowing you timber's basis is not a requirement for capital gains treatment. If you purchased you Tree Farm (or forestland), its total bais is the purchase price plus other costs incurred to take legal title of the property. If inherited, it's the fair-market value on the date the person leaving it to you died. If a gift, the basis of the person giving it to you "carries over" to you. But knowing the basis for the Tree Farm (or forestland) as a whole is just a start. You need to allocate the total among the individual assets acquired with the property. At a minimum, these are the timber and the timberland. Even if you make the allocation years after acquiring your Tree Farm (or forestland), you must use conditions on the date of acqui- Illinois Forest Management Newsletter sition. That's why it is better sooner than later. If later, you and your forester have to estimate the quantity, quality, and fair-market value of the timber on the date of acquisition. It's also necessary to estimate the fair-market value of the timberland and any other as- sets acquired at the same time. In some cases it may not be cost effective to gather the necessary information. You're spending today's dollars to pick up old (de- flated) basis dollars. My rule of thumb is to almost always go through the process if you acquired your Tree Farm (or forestland) withing the last 10 years. If it's been more than 20 years, the cost may exceed the benefit. You'll need to estimate what the potential benefit is to you. Regardless of when it's done, the process is the same. Estimate the fair-market value (FMV) of your land, the merchantable timber, and other assests you acquired. Get the total FMV by summing the individual FMV's for all the assets. Most likely the total FMV won't be what you paid for the property or its fair-market value in the estate. This doesn't matter because the process used adjusts for this. Divide the FTVIV of each asset by the total FMV of the individual assets. The percentage for each asset is multiplied by the acquisition cost to get the basis fo that asset. The result is that the sum of the bases for each of the assets equals the acquisition cost or f^V of the estate. This method for basis allocation is discussed in detail in IRS publications and all the timber-tax manu- als. Your state forester, extension forester, or consulting forester can help find historical land and timbe values. IFMN Editor's Note: Illinois timber prices from 1978 to present can be found at the 13 following web site address: http://ilvirtualforest. nres. uiuc. edu/page25.html The IRS requires that to the extent possible pubHshed averages should be adjusted to reflect specific conditions on your Tree Farm (or forestland). The trick is to reconstruct the condition of your timber as of the date of acquisition. If the species and quality of your timber hasn't changed significantly, this can be done b grow- ing the current volume of timber in reverse. You also need to re- duce the current volume by previous timber you may have har- vested. You may need the help of a forester to estimate the informa- tion needed. A reasonable effort should be made to get the best available infor- mation. What's reasonable depends on how far back you're going, the value of your timber, the tax implications, and the cost com- pared to the dollars of basis you'll pick up. The use of professional forester and qualified real estate appraiser may be reasonable for large properties with significant timber values. A do-it-yourself approach may be reasonable for very small Tree Farms. No matter how you do it, keep in your records information about how you got the values used and how the allocation was made. If all you own is the land and timber, it may seem reasonable to use the so-called "residual method" of basis allocation. This means estimating the FM'V of the land itself, subtracting this amount from the total basis, and applying the balance or residual amount to the timber. This approach has been upheld in court. But it only works if it gives a reasonable result. Reasonable means a result similar to what would be obtained by the percentage method described above. But the percentage method described above is most likely to pro- vide reasonable results. If you have already had a timber sale and didn't reduce the pro- ceeds by the basis of the timber sold, you may need to reduce your basis by this amount even though you got no tax benefit from it. Some tax practitioners take the position that this isn't necessary. Follow the advice of your tax preparer. Reprinted from Tree Farmer magazine, Nov/Dec, 1995; page 18. Announcing a new information web site for forest landowners! The Illinois Virtual Forest web site is a comprehensive hsting of forest management and tree care information for Illinois forest landowners. The web site is sponsored by the Illinois Forestry Development Council and is maintained by the University of Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences. The web site can be accessed from this web address: http://ilvirtualforest.nres.uiuc.edu Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 14 ILLIN O I S Illinois Agncultural Statistics Service P.O Box 19283 Spnngfield. IL 62794-9283 Ph (217) 492^295 U.S. Depanment of Agnculture ILLINOIS TIMBER PRICES DIVISION OF FOREST RESOURCES 500 Nonh Grand Avenue Wesi Spnngfield. niinois. 62706 Phone: (217) 782-2361 PRICE REPORTING ZONES June 5, 2000 PRICES PAID ILUNOIS TIMBER PRODUCERS NOVEMBER 1999 THROUGH FEBRUARY 2000 Summer sawtimber prices paid to Illinois timber growers generally showed mixed trends for F.O.B Mill and stumpaee compared to both the previous summer and winter. Of the timber buyers reponing volume of their 1999- 2000 operations, 40% indicated their volume was 500 thousand board feet or more. This repon is prepared by the Illinois Agricultural Statistics Service in cooperation with the Illinois Division of Forest Resources. Unless otherwise indicated, pnces shown in this report are prices reported by licensed timber buyers. The cooperation of those timber buyers who participated in the survey is greatly appreciated. ZONE 1 Illinois is divided into three price-reponing zones, based on timber resources, similanty, utilization standards and practices and soil types. Zone 1 is the Southern Unit; Zone 2, the Claypan Unit; and Zone 3, the Prairie Unit. Ranges of prices for each zone are shown on the back of this report. This report can be used only as a general guide for determining market value of timber. General market and economic conditions are the major price- determining factors Cenain local considerations such as accessibility, site and terrain, distance to market, size of sale, and tree size and quality also affect the price paid. For technical, marketing or management assistance, contact your local State Forester, or the Division of Forest Resources, Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 600 North Grand Avenue, West. Springfield, Illinois 62706 AVERAGE PRICES FOR STUMPAGE AND FOB. IN SELECTED PERIODS SAWTIMBER - S PER M BD. FT. SPECIES November 1998 February 1999 May 1999 August 1999 November 1999 February 2000 Slumpage FO.B, Mill Stumpage F.O.B. Mill Sti-mpage FOB. Mill Ash 160 300 160 270 150 270 Basswood 100 250 110 200 120 260 Beech 80 200 75 170 80 180 Cottonwood 55 160 65 150 70 160 Sweet Gum 80 180 75 180 80 170 Elm & Hackberry 75 180 75 180 70 180 Hickory 100 240 110 200 100 210 Soft Maple 100 240 110 200 100 210 Sugar Maple 160 320 170 280 170 350 Black Oak 170 300 160 260 150 290 Pin Oak 85 200 95 180 80 180 Red Oak 220 3 m 230 360 220 350 White Oak 220 360 230 350 210 350 Yellow Poplar 140 280 120 290 130 280 Sycamore 70 170 SO 180 70 180 Black Walnut 350 510 330 500 300 500 Woods Run Bottomland 100 210 90 190 95 200 Woods Run Upland 150 250 150 260 170 250 FACE VENEER - $ PER M BD FT Red Oak 480 920 610 910 530 900 White Oak 970 1.660 1,010 1,670 1,050 1.630 Walnut 1.390 1.940 1,720 3.120 1,540 2.460 . COOPERAGE - S PER M BD. FT. 1 White Oak 1 280 450 1 290 550 1 300 570 1 UNPEELED PULPWOOD - S PER TON 1 Ton 1 300 19.50 1 3.00 21.00 1 3.30 21.80 1 Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 15 Timber Prices May 1999 -February 2000 June 5. 2000 MOST COMMONLY REPORTED PRICES PAID ILLINOIS TIMBER PRODUCERS | November 1999 - February 2000 PRODUCT UNIT Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Stumpace F.O.B. Mill Stumpaee F.O.B. Mill Stumpape F.O.B. Mill 1. Sawiimber Dollars Ash M bd. ft. 70-250 150^00 85-300 170-350 70-180 180-350 Basswood M bd. ft. 100 N/A 75-225 160-300 70-200 180-450 Beech M bd. ft. 50-100 150-200 85-120 160-200 50 N/A Cottonwood M bd. ft. 50-100 100-200 40-120 120-225 40-80 100-180 Sweet Gum M bd. ft. 50-100 100-230 50-120 130-200 N/A N/A Elm & Hackberry M bd. ft. 50-100 150-230 50-120 130-200 45-80 150-200 Hickory M bd. ft. 50-150 150-220 50-225 150-300 60-150 180-325 Soft Maple M bd. ft. 50-120 150-210 50-180 170-300 70-175 150-300 Sugar Maple M bd. ft. 100-250 180-350 80-300 200-600 70-300 200-650 Black Oak M bd. ft. 80-250 180-500 65-400 160-600 50-280 160-400 Pin Oak M bd. ft. 50-110 180-200 50-160 130-200 50-150 140-250 Red Oak M bd. ft. 110-350 190-500 80-350 170-500 70-350 160-540 White Oak M bd. ft. 110-400 190-600 80-450 170-600 70-350 160-500 Yellow Poplar M bd. ft. 100-200 190-350 50-220 200-350 75-150 N/A Sycamore M bd. ft. 50-110 100-210 45-120 150-250 50-80 150-200 Black Walnut M bd. ft. 200-500 250-650 100-500 250-770 140-500 250-700 Woods Run Bottomland M bd. ft. 50-120 150-250 50-160 160-250 50-150 250 Wood'; Run Upland M bd. ft 80-300 150-400 70-320 160-380 70-300 20O-*50 STATEWIDE | Stumpaee F.O.B. Mill 2, Face Veneer Red Oak M bd. ft. 200-1,000 500-1.500 White Oak M bd. ft. 400-1,750 700-2.300 Walnut M bd. ft. 500-2.500 1.500-4.000 ?. Cooperase White Oak M bd. ft. 170-400 400-800 4, Pulp wood Unpeeled M bd- ft. 2.50-4,00 19.00-23.00 LOG SCALES USED BY REPORTING BUYERS | Scale Percent Usinc Doyle 95 Scribner 4 International 1 CUSTOM SAWING BY THOSE REPORT,NG | Region Percent Reponing Rated Reported S/M bd. ft. Zone 1 15 110-200 Zone 2 22 150-250 Zone 3 19 150-300 lllinoi.<; 19 110-300 VOLUME OF 1999-2000 OPERATIONS Size in (000) bd. ft. Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 % % % M % 1 - 100 19 45 32 33 100-500 19 17 43 27 500 - 1 ,000 29 10 7 14 1,000-3,000 28 14 7 16 3.000 -K 5 14 11 10 Cooperage is the manufacture of barrels. Face veneer is logs cut into thin sheets or "veneer" used mostly by furniture builders. Pulpwood IS used in making paper, fiberboard, and similar products. M bd. ft. means thousand board feet. Sawtimber refers to logs that are cut into lumber or timbers. FOB, refers to the price paid for timber delivered to the mill. MARKED TIMBER SALES - NOVEMBER 1999 - FEBRUARY 2000 STATEWIDE STUMPAGE Woods Run Upland $179-$441/M bd. ft. Woods Run Bottomland $l47-$230/M bd. ft. ♦Prices supplied to Distnct Foresters by seller, may include some veneer. Garry D Kepley, State Statistician Tom Pordugal, Rick Kcstle, Agricultural Sutisticians "Printed by authority of the State of Illinois, "5/5/00, 1.700. 2686 Illinois Forest Management Newsletter U of I Extension Newsletter Service University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 528 Bevier Hall, MC- 184 905 S. Goodwin Ave. UrbanalL 61801 Return Service Requested 12/31/00 Ag Library Serials 22 6 MuiTiford Hall xoui. 'A u^rygory Dr CAMFUS MAIL MC-710 L ^1 ILLINOIS FOREST MANAGEMENT A Biannual Newsletter for Illinois Landowners IN TfflS ISSUE Page 1 How to Measure Standing Timber for Board-Foot Content Page 1 0 How to Eliminate Fiber Pull and Splitting During Tree Felling Page 11 You've Got Gall!! Page 13 Illinois Timber Prices Page 14 Tree Scale Stick & Mounting Instructions JAN'^ iZOOl Volume2, 2000NO.39 LIBRARY I llfhtJis' Forest Management Newsletter is produced by the Uni- versity of Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Environ- mental Sciences and University of Illinois Extension. Our newslet- ter features information from many sources to help you make in- formed decisions concerning your woodland resources. We en- courage your questions and comments which we will share with our readers as space permits. Direct your inquiries to: Editor, IFM Newsletter, W-503 Turner Hall, 1 102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. We continue to receive inquiries from landowners who want to know how to measure trees for their board-foot volume and where they can obtain a tree scale stick to take the measurements. To help answer these questions, we have developed detailed instructions with photographs which help ex- plain the measurement procedure. We also have included a tree scale stick in this newsletter. Instructions are included which detail how the stick is to be constructed using a standard yardstick. The tree scale stick included in this newsletter is based on the Doyle Rule, which is the standard used to measure limber on private land in Illinois. The scale stick is designed for a 25-inch reach. Horw To Measure Standing Timber For Board-Foot Content Standing trees sold for veneer or sawlogs are valued in terms of their board-foot volume; a board foot being a board 1 inch thick by 12 inches wide by 1 foot long. One of the basic tools for measuring the board-foot volume of standing trees is a calibrated tree scale stick. Other names used for this instrument are Cruiser's or Biltmore stick. With the scale stick, the tree's diameter is measured at a point 4 1/2 feet above the ground line and the tree's merchantable height is determined in 16-foot and additional 8-foot log lengths. Knowing these two measurements, the board-foot volume of the tree can be determined using various tree volume tables. Board-foot volumes in these tables will differ because of differences in the way the specific Rules were formulated. Common scales are the Interna- tional 1/4-inch Rule, the Doyle Rule, and the Scribner Rule. The Doyle Rule is used to estimate tree volume in Illinois. Understanding Board-Foot Volume A tree (or the logs cut from it) is basically a large cylinder. When the tree is cut up into logs, the butt end of a log is larger than the State - County - Local Groups - U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperating University of Illinois Extension Provides Equal Opportunities in Programs and Employment top end. The difference between the top and butt diameter mea- surements depends on the amount of taper within the log. When an attempt is made to determine the board-foot volume in a tree, ultimately we are attempting to determine how the sawyer at the mill will cut up the logs into boards to maximize its wood yield (see Illustration 1). Using the various Rules mentioned above is a way of standardizing how many board-feet can be cut from a tree with a given diameter and merchantable height. Illustration 1. Determining the Board-Foot Volume Equates to How Many Rectangular Boards Can be Cut From the Tree. Cutting rectangular pieces of wood (boards) from a cylinder (a log) means that there will be some wood that is unusable for lumber. Every time the saw blade passes through the log, solid wood is turned into sawdust. Similarly, there are slabs and edges that will not be used to make boards either (see Illustration 2). This wood is not wasted, however. Sawdust and slabs and edgings are ftirther processed and are often used to make panel-type products such as particleboard. 'Waste' wood can also be burned at the processing plant to generate steam which is, in turn, used to run turbines and generate power for the processing plant. With technology con- tinually increasing, little wood is ever wasted. How to Determine theDiameter Measurement Tree diameter is the most important measurement of standing trees. The point of measurement is 4 1/2 feet above the ground line , a Illustration 2. When a log is cut up into boards, wood is lost to savvdust created by the saw blade (sawkerf- black lines) andto slabs and edgings (gray areas). point referred to as "diameter breast height" or "DBH." Diameters are usually measured to the nearest inch, but where large numbers of trees are to be scaled, 2-inch diameter classes are used. The tree scale stick used to measure the tree's diameter and its height and the stick needs to be calibrated for the length of your reach. Determining your ''full arm" reach is simple. All you will Photo 1. Determining Your 'Reach' is Easy Using a Yardstick. Place the Zero-end of the Yardstick at Your Eye and Fully Extend Your Arm. Read the Meas- urement at the End of Your Thumb. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Photo 2 and 2a. To Measure the Tree's Diameter, Position Yourself in the Center of the Trunk. Hold the Scale Stick Against the Tree at 4 1/2 Feet Above the Ground Line and Push Yourself Back 25 Inches Away From the Tree. need is a standard yardstick. Have a partner stand to eitlier side of your body. Put the zero-end of the yardstick up to your eye and fiilly extend your arm along the yardstick. The distance between your eye and the end of your thumb is your "full arm" reach (see Photo 1). Have your partner read this distance off on the yardstick. When measuring a tree's diameter or its height, the scale stick is held 25 inches from your eye. Put the yardstick back up to your eye and extend your arm until your thumb grasps the 25-inch mark on the yardstick. Become familiar with the "feel" of a 25-inch reach. Another way to maintain a consistent 25-inch reach is to drill a hole in the middle of the scale stick and attatch a string through the hole. Tie a knot in the sting that is 25 inches away from the scale stick. When measuring trees with the stick, hold the knot on the string in your teeth and extend the scale stick away from you until the string is tight. This simple method will provide a consistent 25-inch reach. At the end of this newsletter, you will fmd a tree scale stick with mounting instructions. It is designed to be mounted on a standard yardstick. The stick has a board-foot volume table printed on it. To measure the tree's diameter, face the tree trunk and position yourself so your body is in the center of the trunk. Hold the tree scale stick horizontally against the tree at 4 1/2 feet above the ground line and push yourself back 25 inches away from the tree (see Photo 2 and 2a). It is important that the distance between your eye and the scale stick be 25 inches. If this distance is less or greater than 25 inches, the diameter measurement you determine will be wrong. Make sure you hold the scale stick firmly against the bark of the tree. Now shift the stick right or left until the zero end of the stick is flush with the left edge of the tree trunk. Without moving your head (move only your eyes, not your head), look over to the right edge of the tree's trunk and read the diameter measurement on the scale stick where the right edge of the tree trunk intercepts the stick (see Photo 3 next page). Diameter of standing trees is measured outside the bark. Because a tree's trunk is not round and is often more egg-shaped, it is necessary to take two diameter measurements to get an aver- age diameter reading. Take the second diameter measurement 90 degrees to the first measurement (see Photo 4 on Page 5). Add the two diameter measurements together and divide by 2 to determine the tree's average diameter. It is important to remember that on sloping ground always measure diameter on the uphill side of the tree. http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmii.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter Photo 3. At the 4 1/2 Foot Height, Move the Tree Scale Stick Right or Left to Line the Zero-end of the Scale Stick up with the Left Side of the Tree Trunk. Without Movrg Your Head (Move Just Your Eyes), Look Over to the Right Side of the Trunk and Notice the Diameter Reading Where the Right Side of the Tree Intercepts the Scale Stick (Yelk)wArro\A^. If You are Holding the Scale Stick the Correct Distance from Your Eye, This Reading is the Tree's Diameter. Diameter Should Alvyays be Measured on the Uphill Side if the Tree is Growing on Sk^ping Ground. How to Determine Merchantable Height Merchantable height refers to the length of the usable tree and is measured from a I -foot stump height to a cut-off (merchantable height) point in the top of the tree. The cut-off height will vary with locality, with the product being produced, and with excessive limbs, a major fork or other types of internal/external defects. Unless there are obvious, outward signs of defect in the trunk (logs), hardwood (deciduous or broadleaf) trees are normally measured to the first major fork in the trunk unless the upper (smaller) trunk diameter limit (determined by the processing mill) is reached before the fork in the trunk. Larger limbs do not necessarily cause a problem if they do not create a "Y" fork in the trunk. Side limbs will be cut off flush with the trunk when the tree is felled. Limbs do, however, create knots, which are considered defects, so the quality of the wood will not be as good when the tree has many branches along the trunk. Other types of defects in the trunk that affect a tree's merchantable height include crook or sweep (bend) in the trunk or outward signs of rot and decay such as a conk (fungus fruiting body), swelling or bulge on the side of the trunk, or a hole indicating a cavity in the tree (see Photo 5, 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, 5e, 5f on Page 6). The cutoff (merchantable height) point will be at point below any of these defects for trees exhibiting such defects. Conifers (evergreen, cone-bearing trees) normally grow with one central stem and rarely fork unless there is a double top. Unless there are internal or external defects, merchantable height in coni- fers is frequently determined by the smaller diameter limit in the top Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html log. miU. This smaller diameter limit is established by the processing For logs that will be cut into lumber, the diameter limit for the top log cannot be less than 8 inches in diameter. If the tree you are measuring has no major defects and no forks, you should measure merchantable height to a point in the top of the tree where the trunk diameter equals 8 inches. If you are measuring timber for its pulp- (see Photo 7 on Page 8). Holding the stick so it tilts toward or away from you will yield a wrong measurement. Do not to move the stick or your head when taking a height measurement. Tilt your head back slightly so you do not have to move it when taking the height measurement. If you wear a hat, tih it back on your head so it does not impair your vision. Moving your head changes angles and will result in a wrong measurement. Photo 4. Tree's are Rarely Round, so You Need to Take Two Diameter Measurements at 90 De- grees to Each Other. Add the Two Measurements Together and Divide This Total by 2. The Result will be the Average Diameter of the Tree. wood content, measure the merchantable height to a point in the top of the tree where the trunk diameter equals 4 inches. To measure merchantable height, the tree scale stick's calibration requires that you stand 66 feet away from the tree being measured and you must hold the stick 25 inches from your eye in an upright, vertical position. The number of merchantable logs can be read from the stick's right-hand margin (see Photo 6 on Page 8). It is important to make sure the stick is held vertical and not at an angle Before you pace away from the tree to take the height measure- ment, walk around the tree and look up into the canopy to inspect its entire trunk for signs of defect. Determine where the cut-off (merchantable height) point is before moving away from the tree. Pace out or measure a distance 66 feet away from the tree. Make sure you walk away from the tree on the level or contour. When you turn and face the tree, the base of the tree should be at the same height as your feet. Do not walk uphill or downhill from the http://www.nres.uiuc. edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter Crook or Sweep in the Tree Tiunk. A Bulge, Sv\elling, or Canker on the Trunk. Burls on the Trunk. Large Dead Limbs Along the Trunk. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.htinl Cavity Holes Indicating the Trunk is Rotten and Hollow. Seams or Shakes Causes by Wind, Lightning, or Frost (Crack) Damage. tree to take its height measurement. Doing so will yield a wrong measurement. When you reach the 66 foot distance, turn and face the tree. Hold the scale stick vertical and 25 inches from your eye. Line the zero end of the scale stick up with the a point on the tree's trunk that is 1-foot above the ground (see photo 8 on Page 9). Loggers fre- quently do not cut trees off flush with the ground, so allowing for a 1-foot high stump is important when measuring the tree for mer- chantable height. If you place a clipboard with a white piece of paper at the base of the tree before you pace away from it, the top of the clipboard will equal a 1 -foot high stump and will be easy for you to see at the 66 foot distance. Now without moving your head, look up (move only your eyes) into the tree and determine where the cut-off (merchantable height) point intercepts the scale stick. Read this measurement to the nearest full half-log (see photo 9 on Page 9). To determine the tree's board-foot volume, use the volume table printed on the scale stick. Knowing the diameter of the tree and its merchantable height in 16-foot logs, you should be able to deter- mine the board-foot volume of the tree from the volume table on the scale stick. The board-foot volume you have determined is called the gross board-foot volume. No deduction has been made for defect in tree. http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 8 Photos 6 and 7. When the Scale Stick is Held Vertical, the Single Numbers on the Right- hand Side of the Scale Stick Represent Full 16- Foot Logs. The Lines Between Each Full Log Represents a Half or 8-Foot Log. To Measure Merchantable Height, the Scale Stick is Held Vertical at the Correct Distance From Your Eye. Make Sure the Scale Stick Does Not Slant To\Aard or Away From You. A Slanted Stick will Result in an Incorrect Measurement If a deduction for defect is made, the resulting board-foot volume is the net volume. As a rule of thumb, in average to good quality timber, you can deduct about 10 percent of the gross board -foot volume for defect. To make consistent and accurate diameter and height measure- ments, it is essential that you do the following things: n Always hold the scale stick 25 inches from your eye. D Take two diameter measurements at 4 1/2 feet above the ground and average the two measurements. n Always measure diameter on the up-hill side of the tree growing on sloping ground. n Position yourself 66 feet away from the tree on the same contour as the base of the tree to determine merchantable height. For more information, please contact the Extension Forester at the University of Illinois; 217-333-2778. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter Subscriptions to Terminate in June, 2001. The University of Illinois Extension Newsletter Service will no longer offer subscriptions to Illinois Forest Management Newsletter. Current subscriptions will be honored through the July 200 1 issue. After June, printed copies of Illinois Forest Management Newslet- ter will no longer be available, but the newsletter will continue to be produced. Both future and past issues can be accessed and down- loaded from this Internet address: http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html If you have a question about your subscription to the newsletter, please direct your inquiry to U of I Extension Newsletter Service; 1-800-345-6087. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Photos 8 and 9. Merchantable Height is Measured From a 1 -Foot Stump Height. A Clipboard With White Paper is a Useful Tool When Measuring Trees in the Woods. Place the Clipboard at the Base of the Tree and Pace Avuay From the Tree 66 feet to Take the Height Measurement With the Scale Stick. Line the Zero-end of the Scale Stick Up With the Top of the Clipboard. Without Movhg Your Head, Look Up Into the Treeand Determine Where the Merchantable Height (Cutoff) Point Intercepts the Scale Stick. In the Above Example, This Tree's Merchantable Height is 1 1/2 Logs. Merchantable Height is Just Below the First Major Fork in the Trunk. Merchantable Height is Measured to the Nearest Full Half-Log. For information on harvesting and selling timber, check out "Logging" at this comprehensive web site: http://ilvirtualforest.nres.uiuc.ed http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 10 The following article is a continuation in the series of Tim's Tips articles reprinted from the logger training manual developed by Mike Bolin, Extension Forester and Tim Ard, president of Forest Applications Training, Inc. for the Illinois Pro Logger Training Program. The chain saw safety and timber felling information is useful for landowners who own and use a chain saw on their property. How To Eliminate Fiber Pull and Splitting During Tree Felling Some trees pull fiber from the sides while they're falling. An easy way to reduce this damage is to make side cuts on either side of the notch immediately after completing the open face notch. A properly formed hinge will be strong enough to control the tree where it is intended to go and weak enough to break rather than split the tree when stressed. Cut the last 5-7 years of growth rings as they are the most likely to split. Cut the last 5-7 growth rings on each side Make "Wing" Cuts on Both Sides ^ Other trees slab easily. This means that while they are falling they may split a piece of wood off the front of the tree. Some other trees may split or pull fibers easily. The easiest way to reduce these types of damage is to cut the sides of the hinge and bore out the center of the hinge. This leaves a felling hinge that more closely resembles a door hinge. Cut Here # Cut Here The previous technique can also be used for trees that may get hung up on the way down because of the dense forest. By boring out the center of the hinge and creating a hinge approximately 1 1/2 to 2 inches on each side, the tree can break off one of these hinges and allow it to roll, finding its' own way to the ground. The same technique of boring through the hinge can also be used on trees which are very large. By boring through the hinge and sweeping the center of the tree, it allows a short saw bar to effectively fell large trees. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmii.html 11 You've Got GaU!! \Ne frequently receive inquiries from landowners concerned about strange growths and deformities on the leaves and branches of their trees. Such occurrences on oak trees tend to be a major source of concern since these deformities fre- quently tend to be large and often grotesque looking. When we tell the inquirer that they have gall, it often elicits some interesting responses. The deformities that occur on the leaves and branches are a result of insect attack on the tree and the deformities that result are called galls. Galls come in an endless variety of forms. Many are strik- ingly colored or curiously shaped. Each gall-making species causes a gall strucmrally different from all others. Galls are irregular plant growths which are stimulated by the reaction between plant hor- mones and powerful growth regulating chemicals produced by the insects or mites that attack the tree. One or more insects develops inside the gall and eventually emerges as an adult(s). The inhabit- ant inside the gall gains its nutrients from the inner gall tissue. Similarly, the gall provides some protection for the developing in- sect from natural enemies and insecticide sprays. Once the gall forms around the developing insect, insecticides are of little use as they do not penetrate the gall. Surprising, there are over 700 different types of galls that form on the flowers, leaves and twigs of oak trees, but little is know about the life cycle of many of the gall-forming mites, midges and wasps that create them. Wherever oaks occur, they are attacked by a group of tiny wasps, mostly less than 1/8-inch in length, called cynipid wasps. There is more than 700 different species of gall wasps and many of them account for more than three-fourths of the galls formed on oak trees. Cynipid wasp adults are small (less than '/4-inch), antlike, and jet black in color (see illustration below). They do not sting or attack humans or animals and thus are no threat to adults, children or pets. Gall makers must attack a tree or plant at a particular time in the year to be successful. Otherwise they may not be able to stimulate the plant to produce the tissue which forms the gall. Gen- erally, initiation of leaf galls occurs around "bud break" or as new leaves begin to unfold in the spring. y1 Cynipid Wasp (enlarged) NC State Univ. Female cynipid wasps lay eggs into actively-growing branch buds. Wasp larvae hatch from the eggs and their feeding on the leaf tissue causes a reaction in oak leaves that forms a gall. As the gall tissue envelopes the larva, it continues to feed on the gall tissue, pupates within the gall, and then finally the mature adult wasp chews an exit hole in the gall to emerge. Oak leaf galls (see Photo 1 ) are generally not considered life-threat- ening to the tree and therefore are seldom considered a problem. They are more likely a nuisance factor to homeowners and land- owners since they visually degrade the appearance of the tree. However, some people like the unique appearance that leaf galls give to the tree. Photo 1. Leaf Galls on Oak, Michigan state Univ. Oak galls that do cause damage and possible mortality of the tree are the homed oak gall and the gouty oak gall. These galls form on twigs and stems and are solid, woody masses that can girdle branches or make them droop from the sheer weight of the heavy growths. The galls can grow to more than 2 inches in diameter and frequently form adjacent to each other so that entire twigs are en- veloped. As the gall envelopes the twig, it chokes off the flow of nutrients to the end of the twig and thus this part frequently dies. If there are only a few galls, the tree's vigor is not impacted much. However, if there is a heavy infestation of galls, particularly on a small, young tree, with many dying branches, this can severely weaken the tree and its eventual death could occur. Horned oak and gouty oak galls have a long and complex develop- ment that takes two or more years to develop. The galls are caused by a cynipid wasp. The first stage is a blister-like leaf gall that occurs along larger leaf veins. Adult wasps emerge from the vein galls around mid-July. These wasps mate and the females lay their eggs in oak twigs. The second stage is a knotty' twig gall that starts in mid-summer and becomes fully mature in 1 to 2 years. Adult wasps emerge from the galls in the spring.. Gouty oak twig galls are http://\vww.nres.uiuc.edii/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 12 smooth. Homed oak galls have horn-like projections (see Figure 2). One adult wasp can emerge from each horn and begins to lay eggs in the developing leaf buds, thus starting the life cycle anew (see Illustration A). Figure 2. Horned Oak Gall (top), Gouty Oak Gall (bottom) IL Natural History Survery Illustration A. Cornell University Some Obsen/ations on the Life History of the Horned Oak Gall: ^ Female wasps / eniege trom twig 1]/ galls and lay eggs on young leaves Twig galls ' Leaf vein galls result from egg laying Tiny male and female wasps emerge from leaf vein gall \. Life cycle begins again Lay eggs in twigs Twig galls develop Leaf vein galls appear Female wasps emerge from twig galls Another large (1 to 2 inches in diameter) gall that frequently ap- pears on oak trees is the oak apple gall. This round, golfball-like growth is filled with a spongy mass (see photo below). A single wasp larva is located in a hard seed-like cell in the center. Oak apple galls are usually found on the petioles or midribs of leaves. They will dry to a brown, paper-thin wall with practically no weight. They cause no appreciable damage to the tree. So what are your options for control if your oak tree is covered with galls? Not much to your liking I'm afraid. Once the gall forms, there is little that can be done to control the insect developing inside until it emerges as an adult. As the adults emerge, timing of insecti- cide sprays is critical to insure adequate control. Normally only a treatment window of 3 to 7 days exists for spray treatment with an insecticide. Some sources report that the insecticide Sevin (carbaryl) provides some control by killing adult wasps as they emerge from the galls. Other sources indicate that the use of an insecticide to control adult wasps emerging from the galls actually increases future gall formation since the insecticide also kills beneficial predatory in- sects that prey on the adult wasps. By reducing the population of natural predators, the population of surviving adult wasps can explode leading to an even more severe gall problem. Once the gall forms and is noticed, it is too late to treat. The gall will remain until it is destroyed. If you have trees infested with leaf galls harboring developing larva that will emerge from the gall as adults in the spring, the best control measure would be to rake up the gall-infested leaves as they fall from the tree and bum them. Similarly, if your tree is infested with twig gall, such as homed oak- or gouty oak gall, any twig with a gall should be pruned off behind the gall when the wasp is still inside the gall and burned. This is not too practical for large trees with many galls, but professional treat- ment with an insecticide will be an expensive proposition that will not solve the problem. Once the galls have been removed, the tree should be fertilized to improve its vigor. For more information on oak galls, you can contact this newsletter or Dr. James Appleby, Forest Entomologist with the University of Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sci- ences, at 2 1 7-244-343 1 . SOURCES: Home, Yard & Garden Newsletter, University of Illinois Extension; University of Kentucky Department of Entomology; Cornell University; Virginia Tech Cooperative Extension Service. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html 13 ILLINOIS l^^s^ Illinois Agricultural ]^^^ Statistics Service |l ^^ P.O. Box 192K3 SpringficlcUL 62794-9283 Ph (217) 492-4295 U.S. Department of Agriculture ILLINOIS TIMBER PRICES DIVLSION or POUE.ST RII.SOUUCES 600 North Granil Avenue West Springrield. Illinois. 62706 Phone: (217) 782-2361 NATURAL RESOURCES December 14. 2000 PRICES PAID ILLINOIS TIMBER PRODUCERS MAY 2000 THROUGH AUGUST 2000 This report is prepared by the Illinois Agricultural Statistics Service in cooperation with the Illinois Division of Forest Resources. Unless otherwise indicated, prices shown in this report are prices reported by licensed timber buyers. The cooperation of those timber buyers who participated in the survey is greatly appreciated. Illinois is divided into three price-reporting zones, based on timber resources, similarity, utilization standards and practices and soil types. Zone 1 is the Southern Unit; Zone 2, the Claypan Unit; and Zone 3, the Prairie Unit. Ranges of prices for each zone are shown on the back of this report. Of the timber buyers reporting volume of their 2000 operations. 44% indicated their volume was 500 thousand board feet or more. This report can be used only as a general guide for determining market value of timber. General market and economic conditions are the major price- determining factors. Certain local considerations such as accessibility, site and terrain, distance to market, size of sale, and tree size and quality also affect the price paid. For technical, marketing or management assistance, contact your local State Forester, or the Division of Forest Resources. Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 600 North Grand Avenue, West. Springfield. Illinois 62706. PRICE REPORTING ZONES ZONE 1 AVERAGE PRICES FOR STUMPAGE AND F.O.B. IN SELECTED PERIODS SAWTIMBER - $ PER M BD. FT. SPECIES May 1999- August 1999 November 1999 - February 2000 Sltinipage r.O.B. Mill Stumpage F.O.B. Mill May 2000 - August 2000 Stumpage F.O.B. Mill Ash na. CM ^ h- m N o o o o 00 rt Tt ^ (») (0 00 o o o o o N N T- oo n u) N 00 o o o o 10 ^ 0) ^ CM ^ U) N o o o o N (0 0) O N l«) ^ (0 -4- oo CO -3- o oo Csl o o o o r^ 00 00 (o ^ N « ^ 00 vo o o p o r) (s 5 (O r- (S «0 fO o o o o O (O N (O f r- N (M O O O O N (M (O 0) (N -2- o o o If) 00 o o o (0 10 tt M ■n o w oo ILLIN d NRE ENT TY OF ION an ARTM -1- IVERSI XTENS DEP \o o o ziu •D -1 H O o (A (0 (0 Ik (0 o o o o oooo .J ^ -i ^ Ik HI- H 1- o OOOO tc OOOO Ml lb Ik Ik Ik a (0 (0 (0 (0 ^ 'N^ ^ T- T- T- 3 Z T- CM rt ^ z S So o D Z Q 1^ _^__ U) S Si (0 ^% 0) Q. CS) o ^- 4-« CO il O (0 O CO o o CO CO •o "co c > CO CO ^ CO o T CO 0> O CO 15 Q- *- o i- w O 0 '^ CO (0 o "E ^ CO "D >% c x: o '4-1 ^ O CO "O o O c c ^ Si -^Ij 3 CO o c E 'co .— CO o o CO CO CO CO u u (0 CO o o ^ 2 0) CO . D)~ o 2h^ o a CO 0 SI c CO b 3 t 0 C 0 £ ^ 0 J^ CO 0 0) -*-» 05 O C w o o I- o o - c "55 "= = p CO 0 C y, .c Q *- 0) E CO o CO o CO (D E 3 c ■0^5 CD o) E 0) o ^ ♦- t 0) c £ CO 0) 0) CO ^J= 0) ^ *- >- (0 •t ^ %SL o CO 0) c _ x: o ■o - .E O CJ> jt 4.1 ^ r~ ^ N. CD ^ ^ 0) ■c E E ?.5 2 o-or £ TJ CJ ^ O (0 5 E 3 c 0 I- - (0 Q. O) 0) o CO (0 E 3 o CD CO u ^-* CO o .0 CO o o SI 3 c o o CO ♦J c o E o 3 CO CO 0) E CO O) o £ o O >- CO 5> (D JQ |i ! = W CO ii C CO — *^ -° o 0) o ^ Q. H- (0 http://www.nres.iiiuc.edii/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter U of I Extension Newsletter Service University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 528 Bevier Hall, MC- 184 905 S. Goodwin Ave. Urbana,IL 61801 Return Service Requested 12/31/2001 Ag Library Serials Clerk 226 Mumford Hall 1301 W Gregory Dr CAMPUS MAIL MC-710 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS EXTENSION ^\ NOV 2 0 yooi UNIVERSITYOFJLL(J^C:S J ILLINOIS FOREST MANAGEMENT A Biannual Newsletter for Illinois Landowners LAST PAPER ISSUE go to our web site for future issues http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.htinl IN THIS ISSUE Page 1 Page 3 Page 6 Pages Page 10 Illinois Woodlands Under Siege—Invasive, Exotic Species Coming to a Woodland Near You — Garlic Mustard The Case for Green Certification Tim's Tips — Managing Spring Poles Illinois Timber Prices Volume 1,2001 No. 40 Illinois Forest Management Newsletter is produced by the Uni- versity of Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Environ- mental Sciences and University of Illinois Extension. Our newslet- ter features information from many sources to help you make in- formed decisions concerning your woodland resources. We en- courage your questions and comments which we will share with our readers as space permits. Direct your inquiries to: Editor, IFM Newsletter, W-503 Turner Hall, 1 102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. Illinois Woodlands Under Siege There is a revolution occurring throughout Illinois. It's not one that makes headlines in the newspaper or is the featured story on the 6 o'clock news, but it is a serious revolution none-the-iess that is impacting many of Illinois' private and public woodlands. This silent revolution is the ousting of our native plant species by exotic, invasive species. Most landowners are unaware that this is happening and that their woodland is under siege. Many landowners even enjoy the picturesque flowering that occurs in their woodland when these exotic species flower. The upshot is that many of these exotic species have no natural enemies or preda- tors and once they become introduced into your woodland, they quickly become establish and spread rapidly throughout the forest floor shading out most of the native groundcover, wildflowers, shrubs and small tree species. Soon all that is left is a forest under- story of the invasive species. It is estimate that likely one-third of the plants you find in Illinois woodlands are not native plant spe- cies. Our woodlands are not the only environments being threatened and invasive plant species are not the only exotic threat. There are many exotic animal species that inhabit Illinois aquatic and terres- trial habitats. For a better understanding of exotic-invasive species and the serious threat they are to our native plant and animal popu- lations the following information from an Illinois Natural Histor>' Survey report on Invasive Species is reprinted: Invasive Species - Issues The first European settlers in North America brought with them several domesticated animals and a variety of plants for food, fiber, garden, and medicinal purposes. They also brought unintended species, such as the house mouse, Norway rat, housefly, and nu- State - County - Local Groups - U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperating University of Illinois Extension Provides Equal Opportunities in Programs and Employment merous weeds, including dandelions. Over the years, a great num- ber of other non-native species have been brought to this conti- nent from all over the world. Some of these species have been able to reproduce on their own and are thoroughly naturalized. Exotic, invasive species (EISp) are those organisms that arrive in a new habitat and cause harm to the local flora and fauna. Their populations often increase unchecked because evolved predator/ prey relationships were not transferred with them, and hence there are no natural predators or diseases of these species. The kinds and magnitude of threats posed by EISp are numerous and increas- ing in Illinois. Exotic species have invaded and in the future will invade all types of human-manipulated and natural habitats. In fact, a new invasive species, the Asian longhorned beetle, was discovered (and is being controlled) in the Chicago. In Illinois, the EISp problem is exacerbated by three significant factors: 1) due to its geographic location and features, Illinois is a prime transporta- tion hub in the U.S., and movement of trade and commercial goods through the state occurs via rail, road, waterway, and air; 2) the already reduced acreage of natural habitats in Illinois makes these areas and the species they contain increasingly threatened and endangered by development and EISp; and 3) although several individual projects address EISp, there is no concerted effort at the state level to bring together a broad array of scientists and habitat managers, representing diverse expertise and perspectives, to ad- dress the problems of EISp at an ecosystem level. Although many native species (e.g., white-tailed deer, beaver, black locust trees) also are ecological problems or nuisances in Illinois, those prob- lems have different causes and different solutions. [Editor 's Note: At the time this background report was prepared, Item 3 above was true. The Illinois Department of Natural Re- sources ' Natural History Survey (INHS) is actively involved in the detection of new exotics species and to study their impact both on our environment and economy. INHS scientists are developing strategies to prevent introductions of new invasive species and control invaders that have already arrived or at least limit their spread and harmful effects.] A vast array of EISp have invaded Illinois habitats — aquatic, ter- restrial, agricultural, natural areas, and urban forests. EISp harm Illinois in several ways. EISp compete with native species that are threatened by habitat fragmentation or human-induced disturbance, and thus the added effect of EISp can be severe. Illinois is devel- oped and disturbed more intensively than many other states, thus the threats and pressure from EISp likely are surpassed only in Hawaii and Florida. Deleterious impacts can have environmental, economic, or even human-health costs. For example, exotic weeds that have invaded Illinois threaten the long-term existence and func- tion of forests, prairies, and wetlands, and directly impact plants and animals in these habitats. In agricultural habitats, exotic weed and insect pests cause crop losses, lead to large-scale application of pesticides, and limit commerce via quarantines. Nationwide, an- nual crop losses from exotic insects exceed $92 billion, and losses from exotic weeds exceed $5 billion. Although quantifying environ- mental costs of EISp is difficuh, EISp devalue natural lands that have been the focus of environmental investment as long-term ecological island habitats in Illinois. Since 1 99 1 , the Natural Areas Acquisition Fund has acquired 8,100 acres at a cost of $12 million. The Nature Preserve System in the state protects 35,000 acres, worth over $50 million. In addition, the Illinois Department of Natu- ral Resources owns 400,000 acres of land worth more than $600 million. Finally, several EISp are associated with threats to human health, such as the arboviruses vectored by the Asian tiger mos- quito. Many exotic species occur in Illinois, but not all have become pests or have major impacts. However, once established and spreading, many EISp defy control measures, which are often limited, unavail- able, economically not viable, or socially (and environmentally) unacceptable. For example, large-scale use of insecticides through- out northeast Illinois might deter the incipient invasion of gypsy moth, but could harm local insect and bird fauna and would cause an uproar in urban and suburban areas. The spread of aquatic species, such as the round goby, could be curtailed by chemical or electrical barriers, but the costs are potentially great and these barriers could harm other species. Devising intervention measures that are acceptable and cause the least conflict and disruption of economic and environmental systems will be crucial. Added to the problems of EISp is the lack of concerted measures to access the current status and impacts of EISp, to predict potential EISp, and impose control measures. Different state agencies or entities in a single organization often are unaware of ongoing projects, thus efforts either can be duplicative or at odds with each other. Some EISp problems are due to competing interests: the Ring- neck Pheasant is a valuable game bird but also impacts native ground-nesting grassland birds; exotic fish stocked for fishing or weed control compete with native fish or alter food webs; exotic plants (e.g., Japanese honeysuckle, autumn olive, multiflora rose, crown vetch) promoted for erosion control or wildlife habitat dis- place native plants. SOURCE: www.inhs.uiuc.edu/chf/pub/an report/97 98/ projects. htm l#invspec NEW INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES SERIES!!! In this issue of Illinois Forest Management Newsletter, we will begin a new series in our newsletter entitled "Coming to a Wood- land Near You" that deals with exotic-invasive species that are impacting our woodlands in Illinois. The article will focus on a specific species and will help you identify it, understand its life history and its impact on your woodland, and how you can attempt to control it. We will use information from many sources to help keep you informed on this serious, but silent, malady. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Coming to a Woodland Kear You — Exotic Species & How to Deal with Tliem — QarC'ic Mustard DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT: Garlic mustard is an exotic species introduced from Europe presum- ably by early settlers for its supposed medicinal properties and for use in cooking. It is widely distributed throughout the northeast- em and Midwestern U.S. from Canada to South Carolina and west to Kansas, North Dakota, and as far as Colorado and Utah. Garlic mustard grows in upland and floodplain forests, savannas, yards, and along roadsides, occasionally in full sun. It is shade-tolerant, and generally requires some shade; it is not commonly found in sunny habitats. It cannot tolerate acidic soils. The invasion of for- ests usually begins along the wood's edge, and progresses via streams, campgrounds, and trails. LIFE fflSTORY AND EFFECTS OF INVASION: This species is a biennial that produces hundreds of seeds per plant. The seeds are believed to be dispersed on the fur of large animals such as deer, horses, and squirrels, by flowing water and by human activities. In our areas, seeds lie dormant for 20 months prior to germination, and may remain viable for five years. Seeds germinate in early April. First-year plants appear as basal rosettes in the summer season. First-year plants remain green through the following winter, making it possible to check for the presence of this plant in your woods throughout the year. Garlic mustard be- gins vegetative growth early in the spring, and blooms from May through early June. Fruits begin to ripen in mid-July, and are dis- seminated through August. Viable seeds are produced within days of initial flowering. Garlic mustard is a rapidly spreading woodland weed that is dis- placing native woodland wildflowers in Illinois. It dominates the forest floor and can displace most native herbaceous species within ten years. This plant is a major threat to the survival of Illinois woodland herbaceous flora and the wildlife that depend on it. Many native wildflowers that complete their life cycles in the springtime (e.g., spring beauty, wild ginger, bloodroot, Dutchman's breeches, hepatica, toothworts, and trilliums) occur in the same habitat as garlic mustard. Once introduced to an area, garlic mustard out- competes native plants by aggressively monopolizing light, mois- ture, nutrients, soil and space. Wildlife species that depend on these early plants for their foliage, pollen, nectar, fruits, seeds and roots, are deprived of these essential food sources when garlic mustard replaces them. Humans are also deprived of the vibrant display of beautiful spring wildflowers. There are two modes of spread: an advancing front, and satellite population expansion pos- sibly facilitated by small animals. Unlike other plants that invade disturbed habitats, garlic mustard readily spreads into high quality forests. DESCRIPTION: Garlic mustard is a cool-season biennial herb that ranges from 12 to 48 inches in height as an adult flowering plant. Leaves and stems emit the distinctive odor of onion or garlic when crushed (particu- larly in spring and early summer), and help distinguish the plant from all other woodland mustard plants. First-year plants consist of a cluster of 3 or 4 round, scallop edged leaves rising 2 to 4 inches in a rosette. Second-year plants generally produce one or two flower- ing stems with numerous white flowers that have four separate petals. Garlic mustard is the only plant of this height in our woods with white flowers in May. Fruits are slender, four-sided pods or capsules 1 to 2.5 inches long called siliques that produce a single row of oblong black seeds with ridged seed coats. Siliques become tan and papery as they mature. By late June, most of the leaves have faded away and garlic mustard plants can be recognized only by the dead and dying stalks of dry, pale brown seedpods that may remain and hold viable seed throughout the summer. Stem leaves are alternate and triangular in shape, have large teeth, and can be 2 to 3 inches across in fruiting plants. Petioles are longer on the leaves towards the base. Garlic mustard can also be distinguished by its uproot, which is slender, white, and "s"-shaped at the top of the root. Garlic Mustard. Illustration: National Botanical Services of Canada http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter Leaves of 1st-year plants growing in rosettes. Photo: New England Wildflower Society A = Fruit pod referred to as a siliques. B = close-up of flower. C = Close-up of 2nd-year plant with flowers. D = Silhouette of 2nd-year plant, illustration: Virginia Department of Natural Resources Leaves, stalk and flowers of 2nd-year plant. Photo: Ken Robertson, IL Natural History Survey Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Flowers and leaves of 2nd-year plant. Photo: wi dnr Fruiting stalks with pods containing seeds. Photo: TNC Weeds, UC-Davis Garlic mustard left unchecked will quickly dominate the woodland understory choking out all native ground plants and Wildflowers. Photo by J. Randall; invasive Plant Council of New York State http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter comnouiNQ qarlic /s\usiAnv MECHANICAL CONTROL: Minor infestations can be eradicated by hand pulling at or before the onset of flowering, or by cutting the flower stalk as close to the soil surface as possible just as flowering begins (cutting a couple inches above ground level is not quite as effective). Cutting prior to this time may promote re-sprouting. Cutting flowering plants at the ground level has resulted in 99% mortality and eliminates seed production. A scythe, monofilament weed whip, or power brush cutter may be helpful if the infestation covers a large area. When pulling, the upper half of the root must be removed in order to stop buds at the root crown from sending up new flower stalks. Pulling is very labor intensive, and can result in soil disturbance, damaging desirable species, and bringing up seeds from the seed bank. These results can be partially prevented by thoroughly tamping soil after pulling. If, however, seed bank depletion is desired, leave the soil in a disturbed state to encourage further germination, and return an- nually to remove the plants. In general, cutting is less destructive than pulling as a control method, but can be done only during flower stalk elongation. Once seedpods are present, but before the seeds have matured or scattered, the stalks can be clipped, bagged and removed from the site to help prevent continued buildup of seed stores. Pulling can be done at any time when the soil is not frozen. If flowering has progressed to the point that viable seed exists, remove the cut or pulled plants from the area. Because seeds remain viable for five years, it is essential that an area be monitored and plants removed for at least five years after the initial control effort. For larger infestations, fall or early spring burning may be effective. First year plants are killed by fire, if the fire is hot enough to remove all leaf litter. However, the bare soil enhances survival of seedlings that germinate after the fire, and the total population may increase after the fire. Dense populations may be controlled more effectively by fall burning, when leaf litter provides adequate fuel. Spring bums should be conducted early enough to minimize possible injury to spring wildflowers. Three to five years of burning are required, and should be followed by hand-pulling or cutting of small populations produced from the seed bank. Garlic mustard plants hit by fire are generally killed. Because most woodland fires are patchy, flame torches may be useful in areas not burned in entirety. CHEMICAL CONTROL: Several infestations can be controlled by applying 1 % to 2% active ingredient (a.i.) solution of glyphosate (e.g., Roundup) to the foli- age of individual plants and dense patches during late fall or early spring. At these times, most native plants are dormant, but garlic mustard is green and vulnerable. Glyphosate is a nonselective her- bicide that will kill non-target plants if it comes into contact with them. Managers should exercise caution during application, and not spray so heavily that herbicide drips off the target species. Herbicide use is safest for native plants if done during the dormant season, as garlic mustard will grow as long as there is no snow cover and the temperature is greater than 35 degrees F. An early spring application of triclopyr (e.g. Garlon) at a 1% a.i. concentra- tion in solution with water has been used, resulting in a 92% rosette mortality rate. Researchers are investigating potential biological control agents for garlic mustard which may greatly improve the control of this insidious weed. SOURCES: www. anuelfire.coiTi/on2/EVS/garliciTiustard. html http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/alpel.htm The Case for Green Certification Forest product certification is one of things that you either love or hate, there is no middle ground, no fence-sitting. Those who em- brace it see new marketing opportunities and an emerging con- sumer that wants more from products than just service. Those who hate it decry another layer that spreads profits thinner, or unneces- sarily increases production costs. But, as with most things, truth lies somewhere between the extremes: yes, it costs more to produce a certified product, but manufactures who produce 'green' prod- ucts believe consumers will increasingly demand these products and profitability will follow. This in spite of the fact that recent trends have proved otherwise: consumers tend to be more cost- conscious, choosing the lower-priced item over the more earth- friendly one, at least for now. Retailers like Home Depot and Lowes are attempting to expand their green-certified offerings, but the jury is still out as to whether consumers will create enough demand to make it worthwhile. And there is a healthy debate between envi- ronmentalists who fashioned the certification movement with for- mation of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), a Mexico-based, world-wide organization that pioneered forest certification in 1993, and the American Forest and Paper Association (AFPA), which represents forest industry in the U.S. The issue is: Whose impruna- tur is more meaningful, and who is eligible to inspect whom? What is product certification, how and when did it arrive in the U.S. — and why? Is it possible to argue successfully in its favor? Half say "yes," half say "no" and curiously no one is willing to say "maybe." After all, anyone that spends too much time in the middle of the road tends to get hit, sooner or later. But it is still surprising that so many have already made up their minds. Is forest product certification, now less than decade old, here to stay? Or is it a fad that will disappear with rising housing costs or recession? I am going to argue the case that it is here to stay, and Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.htinl if you are in the business of manufacturing wood products, it is time to discover and cultivate sources of certified wood, learn about green certification guidelines and explore green markets for your products. According to some experts, there is plenty of unmet demand for certified wood and this is one of the reasons change is so slow, and the potential for profit is high. The green certification movement emerged in the late 1980's in response to excessive and careless logging in tropical forests. First played out by large companies felling huge swaths of rainforest for wood production and land clearing, even recently enacted laws have not stemmed the flow in some third-world countries. The developed world's taste for exotic woods feeds a growing market for tropical hardwoods that rivals, in some circumstances, markets for illegal drugs. In other words, it is worth more — not to mention safer — for a campesino in Nicaragua to pirate rare trees from sur- rounding rainforests than to, for example, cultivate marijuana. Of course, most American and European consumers have no idea that the picture frames, moldings, fine furniture and other such prod- ucts they buy are supporting devastating practices far from home. Felling and extracting a single, 300-year-old tree can take a small crew a couple of weeks to accomplish, leaving behind many hect- ares of damage from vines that rake the forest floor as the crop tree falls. But the rewards far outweigh the effort and risks, and pretty soon everybody and their brother is out looking for valuable trees, extracting them flitch-by-flitch on the back of burrows. A once legitimate market that proved devastating to tropical rainforests became a lucrative black market in a matter of a few years, and the effects are still devastating. When conservation groups started getting the word out about these practices, there was so much market inertia that it seemed as if cutting would stop only after all the valuable trees had been harvested. Change was slow, too slow for those who witnessed the effects of crude and careless extraction practices, not to men- tion the devastating effects on already threatened habitats. Gov- ernments of third-world countries were fairly quick to react, but powerless to control the steady stream of now illegal exports. It is impossible to stem the flow of wood without stanching demand (which, tangentially, is also the problem behind illegal drugs and the reason source countries point the finger at the U.S.), and this is where the concept of product certification was born. Educate con- sumers about the perils of buying tropical woods, they stop buy- ing them, eventually demand dries up and campesinos go back to cultivating whatever. Forest product certification got started as a way to eliminate lucra- tive markets for sensitive tropical hardwoods. In theory, the even- tual groundswell of demand for certified wood will mostly displace demand for uncertified wood, and everybody wins. So far, this has not proven to be the case, but changing the habits of consumers takes time and there is a lot of money betting that green products will catch hold in a big way. According to a May 2001 Wall Street Journal article, AFPA has hired True North Communications — the same company that devel- oped the wildly successful "Got Milk?" campaign — to develop a $25 million advertising effort to promote its Sustainable Forestry Initiative imprimatur for its member companies. Although accused of 'green washing' by FSC supporters, one thing is sure: a lot of people think forest product certification is here to stay. Fortunately, we don't have the same forest utilization problems in the U.S. as in tropical regions, but there is still room for improve- ment in the way we harvest and use forests. The utilization prob- lems are different but the principles behind good practices that define sustainable forests are exactly the same: use the best meth- ods to harvest and extract timber while protecting forest soils and habitats. A certified forest is one that^ — above all else — maintains the integrity of forest ecosystems; human use is secondary. A certified forest product is akin to 'organically' grown produce, which has established a substantial niche market in the grocery industry in less than 20 years. The Forest Stewardship Council is presently the only world-wide forest and forest product certification organization. It espouses ten principles to which a woodland owner or wood manufacturer must adhere to receive and maintain certification. The principles require an ecosystem-approach to management and a commitment to sustain wood production while protecting plant and animal di- versity, wildlife habitats and other forest values. Third-party "au- ditors", usually foresters but manufacturing control experts as well, visit candidate woodlands and wood product businesses to deter- mine whether or not the practices meet FSC standards. To qualify, the components of products must be auditable as to chain-of-cus- tody from forest to consumer, and every step of the process must meet FSC guidelines. Producers that adhere can market products with the FSC logo, retailers advertise the earth-friendliness of the product, and consumers can feel good about protecting the planet. The idea is similar to a grade stamp on lumber, but it has nothing to do with wood quality or value, rather on how it was produced. To date FSC has certified about a million acres in the U.S., and more than 30 million acres in 37 countries worldwide. The key to FSC's program is third-party certification and verification of the chain-of- custody. Periodic audits of certified producers ensure that stan- dards for practices and products are continuously maintained. The costs for initial certification and subsequent audits are high, and this has been an issue with small primary wood processors and woodland owners who don't yet feel that those costs can be easily recouped by selling FSC-certified products. So far, most are right; but some producers have obtained niche markets for their products and are doing quite well. Others see certification as an investment in the future. AFPA, sponsor of the popular Tree Farm program, developed the Sustainable Forestry Initiative in 1 995, a few years after it appeared http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.htmI Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 8 that FSC was making progress. Coincidental or not, critics say AFPA's purpose was to thwart third-party certification, to squelch a movement created and controlled primarily by environmental in- terests. Although AFPA has yet to roll out its imprimatur, it re- quires third-party audits same as FSC. The difference is that the process is controlled by industry, creating the appearance of a "fox in the hen house" and throwing consumer credibility out the win- dow. Without credibility it is not long before consumers begin to feel like they are paying for the equivalent of air in the cereal box. AFPA also requires its members who want to use the imprimatur to accept and adhere to a broad set of principals, same as FSC. But the organizations differ on things like the allowable maximum size of clearcuts (AFPA says 120 acres, FSC says no more than 40 acres) and on the use of chemicals (AFPA says they are essential, especially herbicides in plantations, FSC advocates practices that don't use chemicals). The "them-versus-us" posture of the de- bate risks losing faith of consumers altogether, but it is doubtful even a feud will stop what amounts to a brand-recognition dispute. The rivalry between FSC and AFPA aside, critics of green certifica- tion say it is fad. When the economy slows down, mills won't be as discriminating of suppliers and consumers will look for best buys and, so far, this has proven to be the case. With no discernable difference in products other than label and price, consumers who don't feel wealthy and magnanimous will always pick the best buy, conscience be damned. Tough times have an effect on consumer preferences, but most experts still agree that sustainable forestry and product certification will become more prevalent, not less. Who will prevail: FSC or AFPA? There is no question that AFPA has the financial clout to build recognition among consumers for its certified products, and the success of certification depends on the perceptions of consumers. But the FSC logo is already in stores, and big retailers like Home Depot have made commitments to carry more green products. FSC is also an international organization and its logo is recognized around the world. With the next great boom cycle most likely driven by globalism, the situation weighs heavily in favor of FSC. Any chance the two can work together? Not likely, but stranger things have happened. This is an article written by Thorn McEvoy, Vermont Forestry Ex- tension and appeared in The Forest Products Equipment Jour- nal, October 2001. It is reprinted here with permission of the author. EDITOR'S NOTE: For more information about the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) or the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), check out these web sites: SFI = www.afandpa.org/forestry/sfi_frame.html FSC = www.fscoax.org/ The following article is a continuation in the series of Tim's Tips articles reprinted from the logger training manual developed by Mike Bolin, Extension Forester and Tim Ard, president of Forest Applica- tions Training, Inc. for the Illinois Pro Logger Training Program. The chain saw safety and timber felling information is useful for landowners who own and use a chain saw on their property. I Managing Spring Poles During any harvesting operation loggers and landowners will en- counter spring poles. As a felled tree falls, it bends over small trees and saplings pinning them to the ground. Spring poles are time bombs waiting to go off, and if you do not know how to deal with them safely, they can easily mame or kill the chain saw operator. A spring pole is defined as any obstacle that is bent over and pinned on one end and anchored in the ground at the other, normally by the roots. Bent limbs on the felled tree can also act like spring poles. We will discuss how to deal with them safely in a future article. The best way to manage spring poles is to avoid them. However, if a spring pole must be cut it should be done in a safe manner. The best way is to release the tension slowly at the maximum point of tension. To locate the maximum point of tension, extend a vertical line from the base of the tree and a horizontal from the highest point of the spring pole. From the intersection of these two lines imagine a 45 degree angle to the spring pole. This point on the spring pole will have the maximum amount of tension. 45 degree angle, point of maximum tension Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.htmI Spring poles may be cut from underneath or from the top. If you choose to cut a spring pole from the top, you must stand at 45 degrees to avoid being hit by the spring pole if the tension is released suddenly. From this position, the chain saw can be used to make a succession of small cuts at the maximum point of tension until the fibers begin to break by themselves. This cut must be made with saw running at maximum RPM with a slow rate of feed. At this time, the logger should move away from the tree and let the pressure release itself The spring pole can then be cut off Cut here small cu Stand Here I ♦ Spring poles may also be released from underneath. To do this, the saw operator should stand at 90 degrees to the spring pole and use the chain saw to shave wood off the underside of the spring pole at the maximum point of tension (see the left illustration below). Do not cut into the spring pole as the compression of the wood will pinch the saw. After enough wood is shaved, the fibers will begin to break by themselves and the saw operator can stand aside and let the spring pole release its' tension naturally. Ifthe point of maximum tension on the spring pole is higher than the shoulders, the spring pole should be released from the top. The logger :an stand under the spring pole, trim any branches that may be in the way and then release the spring pole by cutting off the top (see the right illustration below). The spring pole should fly harmlessly above the logger and not cause injury. http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.htinl Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 10 ILLINOIS ^j^^^^ Illinois Agricultural ii ^^>^ Slatislics Service : \^^ PO. Box 19283 ^^^f Springfield, IL 62794-9283 •^^^ Ph (217) 492-4295 U.S. Department of Agriculture ILLINOIS TIMBER PRICES DIVISION OF RDREST RESOURCES 524 S. 2"' St Spnngficld. Illinois. 6270 1 ■ 1787 Phone; (217)782-2:161 September 10,2001 PRICES PAID ILLINOIS TIMBER PRODUCERS NOVEMBER 2000 THROUGH FEBRUARY 2001 This report is prepared by the Illinois Agricultural Statistics Service in cooperation with the Illinois Division of Forest Resources. Unless otherwise indicated, prices shown in this report are pnces reported by licensed timber buyers. The cooperation of those timber buyers who participated in the survey is greatly appreciated. Illinois is divided into three price-reporting zones, based on timber resources, similarity, utilization standards and practices and soil types. Zone 1 is the Southern Unit; Zone 2, the Claypan Unit; and Zone 3, the Prairie Unit. Ranges of prices for each zone are shown on the back of this report. Of the timber buyers reporting volume of their 2000 operations, 5 1 % indicated their volume was 500 thousand board feet or more. This report can be used only as a general guide for determining market value of timber. General market and economic conditions are the major price- determining factors. Certain local considerations such as accessibility, site and terrain, distance to market, size of sale, and tree size and quality also affect the price paid. For technical, marketing or management assistance, contact your local State Forester, or the Division of Forest Resources, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, 600 North Grand Avenue, West, Springfield, Illinois 62706. PRICE REPORTING ZONES ZONE 1 AVERAGE PRICES FOR STUMPAGE AND F.O.B. IN SELECTED PERIODS SAWTIMBER - $ PER M BD. FT. SPECIES ^Jovember 1 999 - February 2000 May 2000 - August 2000 November 2000- February 2001 Stumpage F.O.B. Mill Stumpage F.O.B. Mill Stumpage F.O.B. Mill Ash 150 270 160 310 150 270 Basswood 120 260 130 240 110 230 Beech 80 180 75 200 70 180 Cottonwood 70 160 60 160 60 170 Sweet Gum 80 170 75 180 70 180 Elm & Hackberry 70 180 75 190 70 180 Hickory 100 210 120 210 110 230 Soft Maple 100 210 120 240 130 240 Sugar Maple 170 350 210 350 200 400 Black Oak 150 290 170 290 150 280 Pin Oak 80 180 85 190 80 190 Red Oak 220 350 250 370 260 430 White Oak 210 350 240 400 240 400 Yellow Poplar 130 280 150 280 140 280 Sycamore 70 180 75 190 65 180 Black Walnut 300 500 390 520 370 590 Woods Run Bottomland 95 200 110 210 100 200 Woods Run Upland 170 250 180 260 180 310 FACE VENEER - $ PER M BD. FT. Red Oak 530 900 630 1,000 540 1.020 White Oak 1,050 1,630 980 1.600 1,020 1,410 Walnut 1,540 2,460 1,720 1,980 1,660 2,780 COOPERAGE - $ PER M BD. FT. 1 White Oak 1 300 570 1 260 470 1 260 430 1 UNPEELED PULPWOOD - $ PER TON 1 Ton 1 3.30 21.80 1 3.60 18.20 1 3.30 19.00 1 Illinois For est Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmii.html 11 MOST COMMONLY REPORTED PRICES PAID ILLINOIS TIMBER PRODUCERS | November 2000 - February 2001 PRODUCT UNIT Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Stumpape F.O.B. Mill Stumpape F.O.B. Mill Stumpage F.O.B. Mill 1. Sawtimber Dollars Ash M bd. ft. 100-200 200-300 100-260 170-400 80-250 250-310 Basswood M bd. ft. N/A N/A 60-160 190-300 50-200 200-300 Beech M bd. ft. 50-100 150-200 40-80 180-200 20-100 150-200 Cottonwood M bd. ft. 50-100 150-200 35-100 80-200 30-80 150-180 Sweet Gum M bd. ft. 50-100 150-200 45-120 160-200 N/A 150-200 Elm & Hackberry M bd. ft. 50-100 N/A 40-120 160-250 45-100 150-200 Hickory M bd. ft. 50-200 200-350 40-220 170-300 50-200 230-250 Soft Maple M bd. ft. 50-150 N/A 50-250 160-350 65-250 275-315 Sugar Maple M bd. ft. 100-300 200-500 40-260 300-700 65-350 325-500 Black Oak M bd. ft. 100-250 200-450 25-310 40-500 20-250 250-300 Pin Oak M bd. ft. 50-100 150-200 40-130 100-250 50-150 150-275 Red Oak M bd. ft. 150-350 300-650 85-400 160-500 125-450 350-600 While Oak M bd. ft. 150-500 300-600 50-400 160-500 100-450 325-500 Yellow Poplar M bd. ft. 100-250 200-300 70-200 300-400 50-250 N/A Sycamore M bd. ft. 50-100 125-200 35-120 150-200 20-80 150-200 Black Walnut M bd. ft. 100-750 N/A 190-500 200-700 75-500 500-1,100 Woods Run Bottomland M bd. ft. 70-200 150-250 60-150 160-250 80-200 N/A Woods Run Upland M bd. ft. 100-350 200-400 60-300 160-500 150^00 325-450 STATEWIDE | Stumpage F.O.B. Mill 2. Face Veneer Red Oak M bd. ft. 150-1,000 300-1,570 White Oak M bd. ft. 500-1,500 500-2,270 Walnut M bd. ft. 400-2,500 600^,680 3. Cooperage White Oak M bd. ft. 100-400 300-500 4. Pulpwood Unpeeled M bd. ft. 3.00^.00 18.00-20.00 LOG SCALES USED BY REPORTING BUYERS Scale Percent Using Doyle Scribner International 99 1 CUSTOM SAWING BY THOSE REPORTING Percent Rated Reported Reporting $/M bd. ft. Region Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Illinois 36 23 8 20 15-200 100-300 200-250 15-300 VOLUME OF 1999-2000 OPERATIONS Size in (000) bd. ft. Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 All % % % % 1 -100 39 21 23 25 100-500 23 17 32 24 500- 1,000 23 21 9 17 1,000-3,000 15 25 14 19 3,000 -H - 16 22 15 Cooperage is the manufacture of barrels. Face veneer is logs cut into thin sheets or "veneer" used mostly by furniture builders. Pulpwood is used in making paper, fiberboard, and similar products. M bd. ft. means thousand board feet. Sawtimber refers to logs that are cut into lumber or limbers. F.O.B. refers to the price paid for timber delivered to the mill. Brad Schwab, Sute Statistician Jerry Burney, Rick Kestle, Agricultural Statisticians "Printed by authority of the State of Illinois, "9/1 1/01 , 1.700. 3405 http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outrcach/pubs/ifmn.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter University of Illinois 0V^3Ci U of I Extension Newsletter Service ^ \ 528 Bevier Hall u V i 905 S. Goodwin Ave. Urbana, IL 61801 Return Service Requested 12/31/2001 ACES Library Serials Clerk 226 Mumford Hall 1301 W Gregory Dr CAMPUS MAIL MC-710 IJMVFUSITY OF UJJNOIS EXTENSION ^1 ILLINOIS FOREST MANAGEMENT A Biannual Newsletter for Illinois Landowners Volume2, 2OOIN0.4I IN THIS ISSUE Page 1 Coming to a Woodland Near You — Multiflora Rose Page 4 Tax Tips for Forest Landowner for the 2001 Tax Year Page 6 Tim's Tips— Small Tree Felling Pages Trees and Drought: the Page 13 ABC's of Watering Trees Illinois Timber Prices #fe ^^^ii^iS^ Illinois Forest Management Newsletter is produced by the Uni- versity of Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Environ- mental Sciences and University of Illinois Extension. Our newslet- ter features information from many sources to help you make in- formed decisions concerning your woodland resources. We en- courage your questions and comments which we will share with our readers as space permits. Direct your inquiries to: Editor, IFM Newsletter, W-503 Turner Hall, 1 102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. In this issue of Illinois Forest Management Newsletter, we will continue our new series entitled "Coming to a Woodland Near You" which deals with exotic-invasive species that are impacting our woodlands in Illinois. The article focuses on a specific species and will help you identify it, understand its life history and its impact on your woodland, and how you can attempt to control it. Coming to a Woodland Near You — Exotic Species & How to Deal witli Them — Multiflora Rose DESCRIPTION A member of the rose family, multiflora rose is a dense spreading shrub with wide, arching canes and stiff curved thorns. Older plants may have a root crown diameter of 8 inches or more and can reach a height of 1 5 feet. Its pinnately compound leaves grow alternately and usually consist of seven to nine small (1/2 to 1 inch) oval leaflets with toothed margins. The leaflets are nearly smooth on the upper surface and paler with short hairs on the underside. Blos- soming in late spring, its numerous white flowers form a panicle from 1/2 to 11/2 inches across. Native roses usually have pink flowers. The flowers develop into small, hard, nearly round red fruits (called hips) that are 1 /4 inch in size. They remain on the plant throughout the winter. The seeds are angular achenes. DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT Multiflora rose was introduced to the East Coast from Japan in 1 866 as rootstock for ornamental roses. Beginning in the 1 930s, the U.S. Soil Conservation Service promoted it for use in erosion control and as "living fences" to confine livestock. State conservation State - County - Local Groups - U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperating University of Illinois Extension Provides Equal Opportunities in Programs and Employment departments soon discovered value in multiflora rose as wildlife cover for pheasant, bobwhite quail, and cottontail rabbit and as food for songbirds and encouraged its use by distributing rooted cuttings to landowners free of charge. More recently, multiflora rose has been planted in highway median strips to serve as crash barriers and to reduce automobile headlight glare. Its tenacious and unstoppable growth habit was eventually recognized as a prob- lem on pastures and unplowed lands, where it disrupted cattle graz- ing. For these reasons, multiflora rose is classified as a noxious weed in several states. Multiflora rose has naturalized in most of the northeastern and Midwestern United States. Presumably, its northern range is lim- ited by an inability to tolerate winter temperatures below -28°F. The plant is found in old fields, pastures, roadsides and forests. It can live in a wide range of soil and environmental conditions, but thrives in sunny areas with well-drained soils. It is not found in standing water or extremely dry habitats. LIFE HISTORY AND EFFECTS OF INVASION Multiflora rose blooms in May or June. Individual plants may pro- duce up to 500,000 seeds per year The majority of seedlings emerge near the parent plant from which the seeds fell. In addition, many species of birds and mammals feed on the hips, dispersing the seeds widely. The canes are also capable of rooting when in con- tact with soil. Multiflora rose readily invades prairies, savannas, open woodlands, and forest edges. Where it grows in dense thickets, it replaces the surrounding vegetation. CONTROLLING MULTIFLORA ROSE Mechanical Control In areas where multiflora rose is just beginning to invade, fire can limit its establishment. Scattered populations in high-quality areas can be effectively controlled by complete removal of the plants. All roots must be removed because new plants can grow from severed roots. Mowing with heavy equipment has proven effective, although non-selective. However, the strong thorns have been known to puncture rubber tires — filling tires with foam may help. Mowing or cutting should be repeated 3-6 times during the growing season for at least 2-4 years. Follow-up moni- toring is necessary because new plants may arise from root frag- ments or previously dormant seeds. Chemical Control Manual application of herbicides on freshly cut stems has proven an effective means of control as it can destroy the root system and prevent re-sprouting. After the stem is cut, herbicide should be applied. Glyphosate (Roundup) can be used effectively as a 10% to 20 % active ingredient (a.i.) solution if applied to the cut stems or canes in the growing season (between July and September) or dur- ing dormancy. Application during dormancy is preferable because it reduces the likelihood of damaging other species. A foliar spray of 1% a.i. glyphosate solution applied to flowering or budding plants is also effective, especially when the flowers are in full bloom. However, it is non-selective and should not be used in high-quality natural areas. Triclopyr formulated for water dilution can be applied to cut stems or canes with a hand-held sprayer. Triclopyr must be applied within a few hours of cutting. Dormant season is the best time for applica- tion to ensure non-target species are not damaged by run-off A foliar spray of 2% a.i. fosamine (Krenite-S) solution in water can be effectively used from July to September if the foliage is well covered. So not spray so heavily that herbicide drips off the target species. Die-back will not be apparent until the following summer. Fosamine is the preferred foliar spray treatment because it is non- volatile and will only affect woody species. A 1% a.i. solution of dicamba (Banvel) can be applied as a foliar spray. Dicamba is selective against broadleaf plants and should never be used if desirable broadleaf vegetation is present. Applica- tion is most effective when administrating during May or June when plants have achieved full leaf-out and are actively flowering. When treating dense foliage, one-half ounce of surfactant should be added per gallon of water for maximum effectiveness. Other herbicides that can be used to surpress and control multi- flora rose include: 2,4-D LV Ester applied when plants are actively growing in the seedling stage; Picloram (Tordon), a restricted use product; Imazapyr (Arsenal); Tebuthiuron (Spike 20?) on pastures, rangeland and noncropland. This product may injure or kill desir- able vegetation having roots extending into the treated area. Keep out of lakes, ponds and streams. There are grazing and haying limitations; Metsulfuron methyl (Escort) used at rate of 1/2 ounce per acre. Rate range is 1/3 to 3/4 ounce per acre. A handful of water softener salt place at the base of the plant has apparently proven effective, but will remain in the soil for many years. Biological Control Biological methods exist to kill or damage multiflora rose. Rose rosette disease, a native virus vectored by a eriophyid mite {Phyllocoptesfrutiphilus), can be fatal. However, it may infect na- tive roses and plums as well as commercially important members of the rose family like apples, some berries, and ornamental roses. The disease spreads from infected canes to the roots and then to other canes. Plants usually die within 1 -2 years. Pruning may be practical Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html in areas where the disease is present because it encourages succu- lent growth, increasing plant susceptibility to mite infestation. Two insects also feed on multiflora rose; the larva of the rose stem girdler beetle girdles and kills individual canes and the other, the rose seed chalid wasp {Megastigmus aculeastus var. nigroflavus) reduces seed viability. The U.S Department of Agriculture should be contacted for more information on biological control methods. SOURCES: http://w\vw.angelfirc.coni'on2/EVS/multi florarose.html hltp://wvvw.nps.gov7p]ants/alien/ract/romul.htm q rfcu % Ml, I Iff I f(}t\i«i«ij: Flowers and Foliage: TNCWeeds, UC-Davis Foliage: University of South Florida / Shirley Denton Flowers: University of South Florida / Shirley Denton Illustrations: Missouri DOC & Virginia DCR http://\vww.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter Tax Tips for Forest landowners for the 2001 Tax Year by Larry M. Bishop, Forest Management and Taxation Specialist Here is some information to keep in mind when you prepare your Federal income tax return for the 2001 tax year. This discussion is necessarily brief, and you should consult other sources for a more comprehensive treatment of the issues. This information is current as of December 1,2001 and supersedes Management Bulletin R8- MB87. Basis and Tax Records Part of the price you receive from a timber sale is taxable income, but part is also your investment (i.e., basis)in the timber sold. Allo- cate your total costs of acquiring purchased forestland — or the value of inherited forestland — among land, timber, and other capi- tal accounts as soon as possible. Adjust this basis up for new purchases or investments and down for sales or other disposals. When you sell your timber, you can take a depletion deduction equal to ((Adjusted basis ^ Total timber volume just before the sale) X (Timber volume sold)). Good records include a v^aitten man- agement plan and a map of your forestland. Keep records that support current deductions 6 years beyond the date the return is due. Keep records that support your basis 6 years beyond your period of ownership. Report basis and timber depletion on IRS Form T (Timber), Schedule B. Passive Loss Rules The passive loss rules are too complex to cover in detail here, but what follows is a very brief summary. Under the passive loss rules, you can be classified in one of three categories: (1) investor, (2) passive participant in a trade or business, or (3) active participant (materially participating) in a trade or business. The law 's intent is that you are "materially participating " if your involvement is regular, continuous, and substantial; however, a low level of activity is adequate if that level is all that is required to sustain the trade or business. This means that record keeping is very important! To show material participation, landowners will need to keep records of all business transactions related to manag- ing their timber stands. Likewise, it would be a good idea to keep records of other business-related activities such as landowner meet- ings attended, odometer readings to and from meetings, cancelled checks for registration fees, and copies of meeting agendas. Gener- ally, you will get the best tax advantage if you are "materially par- ticipating " in a timber business because all management expenses, property taxes, and interest on indebtedness are fully deductible against income from any source. However, if you are "materially participating," you must dispose of your timber under the provi- sions of Section 631 to qualify for capital gains. (This means that you must sell your timber on a "pay-as-cut " or "cut and convert " basis, rather than lump sum.) If you have considerable passive income (such as annual rental payments), it may be to your advan- tage to be considered "passive." Most of the discussion that fol- lows applies to forest landowners who are "materially participat- ing." Reforestation Tax Credit and Amortization The reforestation tax credit and 7-year amortization is one of the best tax advantages for forest landowners. If you reforested during 2001, you can claim a 10-percent investment tax credit for the first $ 1 0,000 you spent for reforestation during the tax year. In addition, you can amortize (deduct) all of your 2001 reforestation costs (up to $10,000), minus half the tax credit taken, over the next 7 years (actually 8 tax years). The election to amortize must be made on a timely tax return for the year in which the reforestation expenses were incurred. Elect to amortize reforestation expenses on Form 4562. (Passive owners may or may not be eligible for the amortiza- tion and credit). Here 's how it works. Assume you spent $4,000 to reforest a cutover tract in 200 1 .You claim a $400 tax credit ( 1 0 percent of $4,000) for 2001. You can also deduct 95 percent of these reforestation costs over the next 8 tax years. Due to a half-year convention you can only claim one-half of the annual amortizable portion for 2000. This means that on your 2000 tax return you can deduct one-half of (0.95 X $4,000 - 7) or $27 1 . For the next 6 tax years you can deduct (0.95 x $4,000 - 7) or $543, and the remaining $27 1 can be deducted the 8th tax year. The annual reforestation amortization is claimed on Form 1040 on the line for adjustments rather than being claimed on Schedule A under miscellaneous deductions. (If you use Schedule A for this purpose, you can claim only aggregated miscellaneous deductions that exceed 2 percent of adjusted gross income). Use Form 3468 to claim the investment tax credit. Any reforestation costs exceeding the $ 1 0,000 annual limit should be capitalized (entered into your timber account). You can recover (deduct) these costs when you sell your timber. A final word of caution: the tax credit and 7-year amortization de- ductions are subject to recapture if you dispose of your trees — within 5 years of planting for the credit and within 10 years of planting for the amortization. Capital Gains and Self-employment Taxes If you report your timber sale income as ordinary income, you could pay significantly more in taxes than you would if you report it as a capital gain. Also, capital gains are not subject to the self-employ- Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html ment tax, as is ordinary income. The net self-employment tax rate for 200 1 is 1 5.3 percent for self-employment income of $400 or more. The rate consists of a 12.4 percent component for old age, survi- vors, and disability insurance (OASDI) and a 2.9-percent compo- nent for hospital insurance (Medicare). The maximum income sub- ject to the OASDI component of the tax rate is $80,400, while the Medicare component is unlimited. However, if wages subject to Social Security or Railroad Retirement tax are received during the tax year, the maximum is reduced by the amount of wages on which these taxes were paid. To qualify for long-term capital gains treat- ment, timber sold after December 31,1997 must have been held longer than 1 2 months. The maximum long-term capital gains rate for timber sold in 200 1 is 20%. (For taxpayers in the lowest income bracket, the maximum rate is 10%). Cost-share Payments If you received cost-share assistance under one or more of the Federal or State cost-share programs during 200 1 ,you may have to report some or all of it as ordinary income. You have two options. You have the option to include it as income and then recover the part that you pay plus the cost-share payment through the amorti- zation and reforestation tax credit already described. You also have the option to exclude the "excludable portion " from income if cer- tain conditions are met. These conditions are (1) the cost-share program has to be approved for exclusion by the IRS and (2) the maximum amount excludable per acre is the greater of (a) the present value of $2.50 per acre or (b) the present value of 1 0 percent of the average income per acre for the past 3 tax years. This second re- quirement gets rather complicated because you have to determine an appropriate interest rate to compute the present values. Pro- grams approved for exclusion by the IRS include the Forestry In- centives Program (FIP), the Forest Stewardship Incentive Program (SIP), the Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP), the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), and the Wildlife Habitat Incen- tive Program (WHIP), plus several State programs (check with your State Forestry Agency for approved programs in your State). Generally, if you harvested the tract within the last 3 years, prob- ably all of the cost-shares received can be excluded from income. In some cases, taxpayers may be better off to exclude cost-share payments. Other taxpayers may be better off not to exclude cost- share payments. Instead, they may be better off to claim the cost- share payments as part of the reforestation tax credit/7-year amor- tization. The important point here is you must report cost-share payments. If you decide to exclude, attach a statement to your return that states specifically what cost-share payments you re- ceived, that you choose to exclude some or all of them, and how you determined the excludable amount. Conservation Reserve Program If you planted trees during 200 1 under the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), you must report your annual payment as ordinary income. If you received CRP cost-share assistance ftinds for plant- ing your trees, you must also report these as ordinary income. CRP cost-share payments used to establish trees can be claimed as part of the reforestation expenses reported for the reforestation tax credit/ 7-year amortization. Farmers may treat expenditures for soil and water conservation on farmland as expenses in the year incurred , rather than capitalizing them (CRP expenditures qualify). However, the amount deductible in any year shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross income from farming. Casualty Losses A casualty loss must result from some event that is ( 1 ) identifiable, (2) damaging to property, and (3) sudden and unexpected or un- usual in nature. Examples include wildfire and storms. Generally, your claim for casualty losses can be no more than the adjusted basis minus any insurance or other compensation. The IRS has issued Revenue Rulings on southern pine beetle losses in timber stands, drought losses of planted seedlings, and casualty loss deductions. It ruled that beetle and drought losses generally do not qualify for a casualty loss deduction because they are not sudden. They may, however, qualify for a business-or investment- loss deduction. A 1999 Revenue Ruling permits use of the deple- tion block as the "single identifiable property damaged or destroyed" in calculating a casualty loss deduction. Management and Maintenance Expenses Generally, your annual expenses for the management and mainte- nance of an existing stand of timber can be expensed or capitalized. In most cases, you are better off to expense those costs during the tax year they are incurred, rather than capitalizing them. If it is not to your advantage to itemize deductions for 2001 , you should capital- ize these expenses. If you choose to itemize deductions, you can deduct these expenses, but the passive loss rules apply. Conclusion Congress provided these favorable tax advantages to stimulate increased productivity from the nation's privately owned forest- lands. When you take advantage of these favorable provisions you avoid paying unnecessary income taxes, and you earn more income from your woodland operations. http://www.nres.uiuc.edii/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter Reference Haney, H.L., Jr.; Hoover, W.L.; Siegel, W.C; and Greene, John L. 200 1 . Forest Landowners Guide to the Federal Income Tax. Ag Hand- book 718. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1 57 pp. (The above handbook is available for sale from the U.S. Govern- ment Bookstore at 404-347- 1 900.The price is $20.00 per copy. Major credit cards are accepted.) Tax Information on the Internet USDA Forest Service publications are available at: www.fs.fed.us/spf/coop IRS publications and forms are available at: www.irs.gov National Timber Tax Site is located at: www.timbertax.org The following article is a continuation in the series of Tim's Tips articles re- printed from the logger training manual developed by Mike Bolin, Extension Forester and Tim Ard, president of For- est Applications Training, Inc. for the Illinois Pro Logger Training Pro- gram. The chain saw safety and tim- ber felling information is useful for land- owners who own and use a chain saw on their property. Small Tree Felling Loggers often assume that small trees are not worth the extra effort for directional felling. However, a small merchanable tree that falls the wrong way, or hangs up, can be very costly to pull down with a skidder. Even small brushy trees that are cleared as part of house- keeping chores around the base of the tree or for an escape route can, if felled the wrong way, create additional production problems. For example, a small sapling which is being removed from the base of one tree can fall into the next tree requiring the logger to cut the tree a second time when doing housekeeping around that second tree. Therefore, extra seconds taken to directionally fell a small sapling can save time later. Directionally Felling Saplings - It is difficult to put a regular notch in a small sapling as it is easy to cut right through the tree. Creating a tab by making a downward cut through the last few years of growth will make an acceptable notch. A back cut, leaving a hinge, will cause this tree to fall in the direction of the initial undercut. It is important for the logger to use the Sight Line on the saw to make sure this sapling falls in the intended direction. Felling Small Merchanable Trees - Small merchanable trees with back lean can be easily felled using a wedge. The process is as follows: 1 . Make an open face notch. 2. Bore through the center of the undercut straight through to the back of the tree. 3. Widen the opening of the bore cut in the area where the hinge will be formed. 4. Drive a wedge into the tree from the back side and snug the wedge. 5. Using the attack comer of the saw on the bad side, make a cut about 1/2 inch below the wedge so that a hinge is formed. Cut just past the wedge: care must be taken not to cut the supporting wood under the wedge. 6. Repeat the process on the good side. 7. Drive the wedge through the tree. Remaining fiber should split allowing the tree to fall in the intended direction. Jy^f-r^^S Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.htinl 4. Drive a wedge into txee from backjiide H^ Uinlercut ti. Repeal process on good !»iile 7. Drive the wedge tbrtjugli the tree http://www. .nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 8 Trees and Drought: the ABC's of Watering Trees The following article is a compilation of information from various sources on watering trees, particularly in times of drought stress. These sources include informa- tion from "Watering Trees", "Drought Damage to Trees", and "Tree Selection for Drought Resistance" byDr Kim Coder, Warnell School of Forest Resources at the Uni- versity ofGeojgia, a/?(^ "Mulching to Conserve Moisture" by Sandra Mason, University of Illinois Extension. Water is the most limiting ecological resource for most tree and forest sites. As soil-water content declines, trees be- come more stressed and begin to react to resource avail- ability changes. A point is reached when water is so inad- equately available that tree tissues and processes are dam- aged. Lack of water eventually leads to catastrophic bio- logical failures and death. Growing periods with little water can lead to decreased rates of diameter and height growth, poor resistance to other stresses, disruption of food production and distribution, and changes to the timing and rate of physiological processes, like fruit production and dormancy. More than eighty per- cent (80%) of the variation in tree growth is because of water supply. Effects of drought can be recognized through- out a tree. The term "drought" denotes a period without precipitation, during which the water content of the soil is reduced to such an extent that trees can no longer extract sufficient water for normal life processes. Trees constantly lose water to the atmosphere. Water is the single most limiting essential resource for tree survival and growth. Water shortages severely damage young and old trees alike, and set-up healthy trees for other problems. Drought conditions can lead to tree decline, pest problems, and non-recoverable damage. Supplemental watering can greatly assist in maintaining tree health during droughts — both during the growing season or during the dormant sea- son. Trees can be old and valuable. They are usually considered non-replaceable beyond 10 inches in diameter. Many as- sociated landscape plants are low cost and easily replace- able. If these plants are damaged or lost to drought, the landscape can be corrected quickly and relatively cheaply. Large, drought-killed trees can not be replaced in two hu- man generations. Watering trees is critically important, es- pecially during periods of drought. Visible Signs of Drought Stress In deciduous trees, curling, bending, rolling, mottling, mar- ginal browning (scorching,) chlorosis, shedding, and early autumn coloration of leaves are well-known responses to drought. In conifers (evergreens), drought may cause yel- lowing and browning of needle tips. As drought intensifies, its harmful effects may be expressed in dieback of twigs and branches in tree crowns. Leaves in the top-most branch ends generate the lowest water poten- tials, and decline and die. Drought effects on roots cause inhibition of elongation, branching, and cambial growth. Drought affects root / soil contact (the root drys and con- tracts) and mechanically changes tree wind-firmness. Drought also minimizes stem grov^h. How to Water Ideally, irrigation should automatically begin when soU mois- ture reaches some critical measure determined by a mois- ture probe or soil tensiometers. Trees should be zoned apart from turf and other landscape plants. Careflil tuning of irri- gation systems are needed to prevent over- watering trees. Manually, the best ways to water trees are by soaker hose or trickle (drip) irrigation, which you tum on and off. Sprin- klers are less efficient for applying water to trees than soaker hoses or drip irrigation, but are easy to use. Even a garden hose, moved often, can provide a good soil soaking. Use a light organic mulch to conserve moisture and apply water over the top of the mulch. Do not concentrate water at the base of the trunk as this can lead to pest problems. Deep watering a tree with a pipe or wand stuck into the soil 12-24 inches is not as good for trees as surface applica- tions. Most of the tree's absorbing roots are in the top 12- Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifinn.html 1 8 inches of soil. The annual root system (absorbing roots) take up a majority of the water in a tree. Annual roots are not the woody roots seen when a tree is dug. Large woody roots have bark. Any bark crack or damage is quickly sealed-off so little water flows through these areas. The young roots are the major absorbers of water and essential elements in a tree, but they are also the roots most easily damaged by drought. Applying water deeper than the an- nual root zone (upper 12-18 inches) misses the active roots and allows water to drain away from the roots, wasting efforts and water. Apply water across the soil surface and let it soak into the soil. Surface soaking allows tree roots more chances to absorb any water, helps maintain soil health, and helps maintain essential element cycling and transfor- mations in the soil. Where to Apply Water Lay out water hoses or applicators out undemeath the tree's crown to the furthest reaches of its branches, commonly called the "drip line". Generally speaking, two-thirds (2/3) of the tree's root system will be found within the zone de- fined by the drip line. The remaining one-third of the tree's root system extends beyond this zone. Concentrate water- ing in the soil areas that are directly beneath the foliage and shaded by the tree. Do not water beyond the drip line and do not water closer than 3 feet to the base of the trunk base on established trees. Be sure the water soaks in well. Use mulch and slow application rates on slopes, heavy soils (clays), and compacted soils to assure water is soaking in and not running off If the tree is surrounded with other land- scape plants, or by turf, deep soaking water applications will benefit all. Do not spray the tree's foliage when apply- ing water. Water droplets on tree leaves can lead to pest problems and destruction of leaf tissue through sun dam- age. Try not to wet the trunk if possible. Young, newly planted trees need additional watering care. There is little sideways movement of water in soil. You must apply water directly over where you need water in a soil. For new trees, concentrate water over the root ball, as well as the planting area, to assure survival. Old, large trees can be extensively watered over the entire area under their drip line. Another method in watering large trees is to select roughly 1/3 of the area within the drip line for concentrated water applications. The whole area below the foliage can be watered occasionally. When to Apply Water The best time to water is at night fi"om 1 0 pm to 8 am. Trees relieve water deficits (refill) over the nighttime hours. Wa- tering at night allows effective use of applied water and less evaporative loss, assuring more water moves into the soil and tree. Nighttime application hours, when dew is aheady present, does not expand the foliage wetting period for un- derstory plants. This watering cycle minimizes pest prob- lems. Drought predisposes trees to pests because of lower food reserves, poorer response to pest attack, and poorer ad- justment to pest damage. Unhealthy trees are more prone to pest problems. Drought creates unhealthy trees. Attacks on trees by boring insects that live in the inner bark and outer wood can be more severe in dry years than in years when little water stress develops. Little water and elevated temperatures can also damage pest populations. Supplemental watering of trees can be timed to help trees recover water and minimize pest problems on surrounding plants. Watering from dusk to dawn does not increase the normal wet period on plant surfaces since dew usually forms around dusk. Watering during the normal wet period will not change pest/host dynamics. Watering that extends the wet period into the morning or begins the wet period earlier in the evening can initiate many pest problems. The next best time to water is late aftemoons when foliage is dry and evaporation potential is not at its daily peak. Be sure to allow applied water to dry off of leaf surfaces be- fore the evening dew appears. This dry gap between wa- tering and atmospheric condensation helps minimize pests problems, which can become a problem with longer wet- ting periods. This is especially critical where turf surrounds a tree. Because trees lose water fi-om day to day, month to month, http://www.nres.uiuc.edii/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 10 and season to season, dormant season watering during winter drought is important, especially for evergreen trees and ju- venile hardwood trees that have not lost their leaves. Be- cause of temperature and relative humidity interactions, much less water is required in the dormant season, but water is still needed. Do not water when the soil surface is less than 40°F. For every 1 8°F increase in temperature, the amount of water lost by a tree and the site around it almost doubles. This feature of water loss must be factored into applying supple- mental water to a tree. Trees surrounded by pavement and other hot, hard surfaces can be 20-30°F warmer than a tree in a protected, landscaped backyard. Water use rap- idly climbs with increasing temperatures and so should wa- ter application volumes. How Much to Apply Depending upon soil texture, bulk density, daily tempera- tures, and rainfall amounts, 1 -3 inches of water per week should keep a tree healthy. Trees in limited rooting areas, in containers or pots, or on major slopes, need additional care to assure water is reaching the root system in adequate amounts and not suffocating roots from lack of drainage. Five gallons of water applied to a square yard (3 feet by 3 feet) of soil surface area is equal to about 1 inch of water. An easy way to determine when you have applied an inch of water to the soil surface is to set a pie plate or bowl down on the ground in the area you are watering. When the container fills with water to a depth of 1 -2 inches, move the hose and the emptied container to a new location and continue watering. Fine soils (clays) require careful attention to prevent over- watering and root death. Sandy soils can be very droughty because water runs out of the rooting zone quickly. There are some water-holding compounds that are commercially available for keeping water near roots. Composted organic material additions and organic mulch covers on the soil sur- face can help hold and prevent rapid loss of applied water. Mulches are any materials used on the surface of the soil. This broad definition could include organic materials such as wood chips, pine needles, straw, peat moss, corncobs and lawn clippings. Inorganic mulches would include river rock, ground tires, volcanic rock and synthetic fabrics. Generally organic mulches are preferred for plant growth because of their ability to improve soil structure and pro- vide a more natural environment for good root growth, and, therefore, good top growth of the plant. Benefits of organic mulches include: D Conserving soil moisture. Mulches can also increase water penetration into the soil. D Maintaining a uniform soil temperature by insulating the soil. Mulches keep the soil warmer during cool weather and cooler during warm weather. D Minimizing soil erosion and compaction from heavy rains, heavy equipment such as lawn mowers, and heavy use in high foot-traffic areas. n Improving soil stmcture through the decomposition of organic mulches. This is particularly important in heavy (clay) soil types. Mulches keep clay soil from cracking after rains. Mulches encourage worm activity and other benefi- cial life in the soil. D Reducing weed problems by preventing weed seed germination. n Keeping lawn mowers and string trimmers away from tree trunks and surface roots. Few things will bring a horticulturist or tree care professional to tears faster than to see tree trunk damage due to lawn mower blight. Once a tree is damaged from a lawn mower scrapping the trunk or a string trimmer bruising the trunk, little can be done to cor- rect the damage. Some disadvantages of organic mulches include: D Induced nitrogen deficiency. As they decompose, fresh organic materials could cause nitrogen deficiency if fertilizer is not added regularly. Fresh mulch should be composted for at least three months before use. Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifinn.html 11 n Aeration and water-logging problems. Fine tex- tured mulches such as sawdust or grass clippings may re- tain too much moisture so should be applied in several thin layers or they should be used mixed with a coarser mate- rial. Over time, sawdust can also crust-over and cause water to run off rather than soak in. Generally mulches such as pine needles and oak leaves will not cause dramatic changes in the acidity or alkalinity of the soil as is often believed. Mulching recommendations: n Apply composted material to the soil surface and "top off' the mulch with coarser, fresher material. Incorpo- ration of the mulch into the soil is not recommended or nec- essary. D Mulch should be about 4 inches deep and should not exceed 6 inches in depth. At minimum, it should cover the zone underneath the tree's drip line. D Keep mulch at least 6 inches away from the tree's trunk and a couple inches away from plant stems to dis- courage insect and rodent problems. How Often to Water Trees should be watered once or twice a week in the grow- ing season if there is no rainfall in that particular week. A few heavy (high volume) waterings are much better than many light, shallow waterings. A greater proportion of the applied water is utilized by the tree with heavy watering. Also, light waterings encourage shallow rooting which can lead to more severe drought damage. Once you begin wa- tering you should continue to water until rain comes. Other Things to Consider Many plants in a small area can effectively compete within the soil to use available water. This water competition can be severe. Remove excess plant competition from around any tree to decrease water stress. Use mulch to conserve water and prevent weed competition. Carefiil applications of herbicides can also reduce weed competition for water, but severe drought conditions can lead to unexpected re- sults. You should be very cautious about using any "weed and feed" fertilizer within the drip line of a tree. Weed and feed fertilizers contain herbicides that target broadleaf weeds in the yard — a deciduous tree is a broadleaf plant. While the herbicide in the weed and feed fertilizer may not kill the tree, the herbicide can put it under considerable stress. Add drought stress on top of this and serious problems could result. When landscape watering is not allowed because of water- use restrictions, "gray water" could be used. Gray water is waste water from household bathtub, shower, sink, dish- washer, and/or washing machine. You should check to see if it is legal to use gray water in your county or city. Gray water will play a greater role in water conservation in the future. If you use a sodium-based water softening system, you should not apply this water to the soil. Xeriscaping — the development of water-efficient land- scapes— is becoming more important. There are a number of concepts involved in developing a water-efficient land- scape and when integrated wisely, will conserve water while providing a ftonctional and aesthetically pleasing landscape. Selecting trees for landscaping based on their ability to tol- erate drought is an important part of any water-efficient land- scape. The following list of trees identifies those species (commonly found in Illinois) that are drought-resistant: Maple Acer negundo Acer platanoides Acer rubrum Acer saccharinum Ailanthus altissima Betula nigra Hickory Carya glabra Carya ovata Carya tomentosa boxelder sycamore maple red maple silver (soft) maple tree-of-heaven river birch pignut hickory shagbark hickory mockernut hickory http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter 12 Catalpa bignonioides Celtisoccidentalis Cercis canadensis Crataegus spp. Diospyros virginiana Elaeagnusspp. Fraxinus pennsylvanica Ginkgo biloba Gleditsia triacanthos Gymnocladus dioicus Juglans nigra Juniperus spp. Maclura pomifera Morus spp. Nyssa spp. Ostrya virginiana Pines Pinus echinata Pinus sylvestris Pinus taeda Platanus spp. Populus alba Populus deltoides catalpa hackberry redbud hawthorn persimmon olive green ash ginkgo honeylocust Kentucky coffee tree black walnut juniper osage orange mulberry tupelo ironwood shortleafpine Scots (Scotch) pine loblolly pine sycamores white poplar Cottonwood Oaks Quercus coccinea Quercus imbricaria Quercus macrocarpa Quercus marilandica Quercus muehlenbergi Quercus prinus Quercus shumardii Quercus stellata Quercus velutina Robinia pseudoacacia Salix nigra Sassafras albidum Ehns Ulmus americana Ulmus parvifolia Uhnuspumila scarlet oak shingle oak bur oak blackjack oak chinkapin oak chestnut oak Shumard oak post oak black oak black locust black willow sassafras American elm Chinese elm Siberian elm For more detailed information on how trees react to and deal with drought situations, refer to the publi- cation entitled "Drought Damage to Trees" byDr, Kim Coder. This publication is available on the Internet from this web site address: http://www.gaipm.org/forest/drought/ droughtdamage.html Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html 108 08^3 -j4 I 30959 -' i 13 lUJNOIs HMHIKI'RK KS tHrwoii i^i'A4eit, i } / V- \ ^~- J. ^I'Hiri. '1 >>!• N«' %«!»l .4'»W!li», W^^K. F *,«. t vfNi rn ins? v; nrs it 1 '^i' ,U?«,! ,».. „,... mi ,„ * ^> • ! i \}<--f rFr«M^t'i^i V wsv - ' MBf*l'K<« HULK'S 1 PfHOOVCf l!MT /j. <: i.t^:' ■ " A^*? J , ,&js;#?. ™ „,f .-S J» Hiu Itwrw^ .,,,., N)i M;.ii , ISSsSik l-fift '^(5: , , , 1 ^l^t^fNw- t\S41n \tt> MM 6 n.m 2WMCS0 n w> yiiYwc^ K»-2iei M^ <«* Il»««*,!-«v5 MW ft >«'s.7f •«. *«fj *i > ' - «i i»> iK. IJ*^». M^ ft S0 7S *- •*«'• . • « */ . i<< i <' ,* MTsS f H4U .* • ' 1 - . *' M>^ 5; . . ' 1» u . . .. ^ .. ^., Ii^t,<^4# MIdf. ni>,m .»«'-4>^ «4 * > ♦! I'^nif^iK MW r 1 . » ' - «- 'i ^ t ladilKiE VI-, >.i 1$J|.*3 -•%!.'^<»' U>i«e«lwi MV. ' ' • . >■ ■ -, > •UiMXi ««.i«i* Yr'few|\*l«* MW II i^MV ,T»- i.y. ' ' *< ;**■! jj' ^ ,-, ^:- Ms«s <• .' * '>• • » . ^ . . > ..^ >iM |i«S:|»«; < . • »«- *■,-. ---«xl M^ • » -*... ^... HM 1 ,«-M- , ,,,lKhll1„j ^fAxmrnM j M^,ti«|i!S„, ? ' • ■' MM It < "i (*!•»;?• i j3i MM i»l ' ' • . *»! ,s. < Mm- •*! JilSS^ .,%»! !»« MM #( 1 « -4i»' . ^- ,. .. . » : . ■ \1n; n ^ Sts. < (,«! - .... „...^. ^i.mj*..Bj. '^^'TI'^M'ai 1";h ^ ,,,^|.^,|.^,^«.|..|i^^i^i|.^.^^^^^ , .- .^^»^«„,^„-j«™^«,.-^ ^ Su£,>siii:M0 U^ t. l;}rK | &&a Z_ w '1 ,'kr"^-<-'- Safe ^VSVM S..^ W1?«J ».y TMOSi 5- fe,«HMi t^fsrws; ,5,ftr^ : , (4 1^ . ..« MW* • J i^ , i5 y.^v i r? ikrs,!: ■■ '■' 4 X ^ '— '■' ■"■f :to9»- H Illinois Forest Management Newsletter http://www.nres.uiuc.edu/outreach/pubs/ifmn.html