f^ m '^M-^'^: UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LIBRARY SB 389 398 1895 ^ \i¥..^^A.'^J^'^ ^jy^- ■•«^ii "t1 (^ -3 k ^. w' mi* mi /'i&.i:^ ¥& f ^' ji*'.^'^ «^-' DateDoD ^JA k%^ C5 or (^^fr Printed in U.S A .^^'^' >6/^/$^K_^ /^^^L^ ILLUSTRATED DESCRIPTIYE CATALOGUE OF Grape Growers' Manual BY BUSH &SON & MEISSNER VlTICULTURlSTS AND PROPRIETORS OF FOURTH EDITION. COPYRIGHT SECURED. ST. LOUIS, MO. R. P. Stttpt^f.y it Co., Prtxters. Ltthographkks and MANiTFACTrRiNO Stattonkrs. 1895. COKXKKl'S. I. GRAPE MANUAL. PA(!E. Origin, pi't'-historif, biblical aiul legendary 1 Climate, Soil, Aspect, and other influences affecting the Grape 2, 3 Historical Notes. Attempts to Cultivate tlie European Grape; their failure. The Phylloxera 4, G Classlfioation of the True Grape-vines of the United States, by Dr. G. Engelmann, of St. Louis, Mo 7—18 '■ and Viticultural Observations upon our Native Species, by T. V. Munson, of Denlson, Texas.. 19— SO With Notes and Extracts from Tliird Edition 19— .SO £.ooatioii: I'reparing the Soil; Planting; Number of Vines per Acre 31, 32 Planting:. Seed Culture. Tendency to Variation, etc 33 Clirat'tinK:. ^'arious Methods, with many Illustrations 3-1—42 Planting:. (Continued.) Training:. Treatment during first year. Trellis or Stakes. Cultivating 4.3—46 Prnning:. Treatment during Second and Third Seasons. Training, etc 47— .'il Diseases of tlie Orape, by Dr. G. Engelmann, with Introductory Kemarks 52 Fnng:ous Diseases of the Grape and their Treatment, by B. T. Oalloway 53—58 VitiCHltnral Remarks on Milde.w and Rot ; Retrospect and Prospect .59—62 Bag:g:ing: or Sacking Grapes 63 Insects Injurious to the Grape, after Prof. C. V. Riley's Reports 64—70 " Beneficial, feeding upon Injurious In.sects, by same 70—72 Ciathering:, Packing, Preserving, etc 72 Wine Making: 73— so II. DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGUE. (pages 81 TO END OF VOt,lIME.I Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1894, by Bitsh & Son & Meissner, Bushberg, Mo., in the office of the Librarian of Congress at Wasliington, D. C. INDEX TO ILLUSTRATIONS IN GRAPE MANUAL. Fr, Secretary American Pomological Society." Lansing, Mich., Xoveiul)er 30, 1883. "It is a grand work— far ahead of anything of the kind T know of in this countiy." W. .1. Heal. IFrom Robert M.\nning, Es<^.. Secretary Masnachusetts Horticultural Society.] Boston, Pecember, 1883. "The Bushberg Catalogue is a treatise on the Botany, Cultivation. Diseases, Insect enemies, and Varieties of American Grapes, ratlier than a Catalogue, as that is commonly understood. I am glad to Icnow that the Frevious editions have been translated into French and talian— an honor which they certainly deserved. I know of no better Manual of everytliing I'elating to American grapes. It should be iji every public liljrary, and in the hands of every American grape grower." Robert Manning. IFrviii the Originator of Ro(iERS" Hybrids.] Salem, Mass., l)ecenil)er 28, 1883. "Thanks for your most valuable Catalogue of Grapes aod Vines. It is the most valuable treatise on this sub- ject I have yet seen. I notice one little inaccuracy, where you say the grapes of mine were produced in a small garden in Roxbury, Mass. It should read Salem, ^fass., where I now reside. Yours, truly, I Edward S. Ko<;ers. I lF7-om GEOR(iE Ellwangkr, Proprietor Afount Hope Nurseries.] Rochester, N. Y., Deceml)er 27, 1883. "It is a work of great value, and fariii advance of any woi'k of the kind." Geo. Ellwangek. [From Prof. T. .!. Burrill, of the Illinois Industrial University.] Champaign, 111., November 30, 1883. "It surpasses in interest and excellence anything of the kind with which I am ac entire work, for it seems to liave l)een written care- fully and conscientiously, and certainly contains a larger amoujit of valuable information ill i-c fere nee to .\merican grai)e-vines than any catalogue I have ever seen. The article ui)on f'he classification of Amerii-an vines by means of their peculiarities of growth, the unfolding of the leaves, thcii- wood-growth, and the size, weight and configuration of the seeds, is both curious and interesting, and is ))robably a step in advance toward the solution of a most diffl'cult prob- lem. The articles upon planting, pruning and ('ultiva- tion are practical and good, and Just what the novice retiuires to guide him to success. The articles also upon the diseasesof tiie vine and upon injurious insects are full, and contain tlie latest and ninst inUlligeiil views u])on t liosc subjects. In the catalogvie and des- criptions of t he gi-eat number of Aniei'ican vines which have appealed, tlie wi-iter, who is supposed to be the .senior member of the firm, is doubtless influenced by his lociility and also by his evident love for this "noblest fruit." In some instances he is, iierhaps, "To their faults a little blind, And to their virtues very kind." But. as a, rule, I bi-lieve the de.scriptious are fail' and iinliia.sed, and as I'eliable as they could well be made. 11 is not only a very complete descriijtive catalogue, but a valuable contribution to our stock of grape knowledge which deserves the thanks of all interested in the subject of American grape culture. Delaware, Ohio. Geo. AV. Campbell. BRIEF EDITORIAL NOTES.-Continued. [From the "Cn/tiralor and Country Gentleman" Jan. 18crben, baft cS bere itS in friin-,ofifci)er unb in italienif^er Sprac^e cvft^iencn ift. St 1 0 ft e V n e u b u r g , Oftevn 188.">. 3(. foil ^atio. GRAPE MANUAL ■ORKilN. CLIMATE AND SOIL. THE GRAPP]. the longest known, the ear- liest cultivated of all fruits, when and ■where did it originate? 'Neath what suns did the first grape-tendril twine into rich luxuri- ivnce? What hands gathered its first luscious berries? Who can tell? Long before research folded back the cur- tains of time, long before the breath of histor}' -ciystalized incident and event, the " amethyst clusters" of the grape ripened under sunnj" skies. Veiled in m^'th, clothed in the shades ■of the past, gleaming from legend and fable, it comes to us breathing suggestions of sylvan deities, Greek festivals and Egyptian rites. Uiblical figures rise before us as we ponder on its origin, and Kings, whose ver}^ names are now forgotten, crowd by on time's re- motest blue. The bible itself tells us how, after the great flood, Noah planted a vine which, according to legend, was a gift from God, himself. Greek mythology ascribes to Bacchus the lionor of having brought the first vine from India; the ancient Thracians (Bulgarians) *That cluster of grapes, seen through the glass of tradition, has heen wonderfully magnified, both as to size and weight. Hyperljolisius are not surprising— should not be surprising— when we consider that they are not very rare in our own day, in the history of our own times even. Popular fancy is ever inclined to magnify; the more so in events of antiquity, events -of a period when tlie printing press did not exist, and when tliere were no exact observers or critics; and what unbridled fancy has invented is carried as tradi- tion from generation to generation, from one century to another until it is believed and repeated, even Ijy men of science. Thus we find in " Wimer's Biblical Encyclopaedia" (Germ., 3d edition, vol. II, p. 684) the following: Stephen Schulz who, about the middle of last century, traveled for several years tlirough Eu- rope, Asia and Africa, and published a work of 5 vols, concerning his travels, found on the southern Libauon a vine with clusters one ell long, weighing 12 pounds, whose berries were of the size of small plums. Forth- with "Kitto's Englisli Cyclopedia of Bililical Knowl- edge (vol. Ill, p. 1071;) repeats the statements, refer- ring them to the same .source, Scliulz and other travelers. Yet, in tlie simple biblical narrative, there is not one icord to justify such legendary exageration. The incident toolv place at the time of the first ripe grapes (Numb. XIII, V. 20), and the messengers, having to carry tlie fruit over a very long journey, afoot, besides being burdened witli pomegranates and figs, wisely a-esorted to this— then common— manner of transport- Considered the vine a gift of Dionysus, the god of vegetation. According to Egyptian tradition Africa owed the grape-vine to Osiris ; grape-stones (seeds) were found with mummies from Eg3'ptian toml)s of more than three thousand years ago ; as also among the remains of Swiss and Italian lake dwellings of the Bronze-age. In Greece, wine was already in general use during the Homeric and Hesiodic times, and it was from the islands of the Ionian and Egean seas that the seeds of an inexhaustible civilization were thrown on the world. Turning from myth to ancient history, we find that some three thousand and two hun- dred years ago, when Moses, leader of Israel, sent men to search the land of Canaan — their promised land — and bring of its fruit, two of these messengers, coming to Hebron, where, in the double cave of Abraham, their fore- fathers were sleeping, cut down a branch with one cluster of grapes, and bore it between them, upon a staff, to the children of Israel in the wilderness, showing them the fruit of the land, which they described as "a land flowing with milk and hone3^"* ing the grapes. That cluster of grapes was, doubtless, fine and large, especially compared with the small Egyptian grapes familiar to the Israelites; Ijut there is no ground for believing them larger than those grow- ing there at tlie present time. Had they been of such phenomenal size and weight as legendary writers claim and as some modern travelers pretend to have .seen, so important a fact would have been mentioned by the men wlio carried them and whose report to the Israelites was intended to induce tlieir people to at once go up and possess the good land. Reference to this land occurs (luite frequently in the liiljle. It is there spoken of (Deutr. VIII, 7-9) as "a land of wheat and l^arley, and vines and fig trees and pomegranates; a land of olive oil and honey." And, in his last bles- sing, Moses speaks "of the precious fruits," but no- wliere is their large size alluded to; nor do we iDelieve tliat clusters of grapes weighing ten pounds each or more liave ever been found anywhere. The immense villi's raised and grown in England, lately also in California, under glass protection, are jus'.ly cele- brated, and liave produced annual crops of from 1,700 to 2,000 bunches; but these are not very large, averag- ing ?4 Ills. each. True, the art of gardeners has pro- duced some single clusters of European grapes (Blaclv Hamburgh, White Nice, Raisin of Calaljria,) grown for exhitiition, weighing from 20 to 25 lbs., but never has iieen found an uncultivated grape, in any part of the world, of which one single bunch weighed half as much. 2 Climate, Soil. etc. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Grape Localities. The dim legendaiy outlines of Rome's aucieut history show us that Numa rompilius (670 B. C), the successoi of Romulns, ordered the use of pure wines at sacriticial ceremonies and pro- hibited the customary pouring of wine on the funeral pvre of the dead. Alexander the Great found the wild vine in India's spicy forests; and the mountains of Fir- distan in Persia probably supplied the vines which, cultivated more than a thousand years ago, produced the famous wine of Shlraz^, sti.l celebrated throughout the East. Thus, from time immemmorial, the attention of all nations has been occupied with the cultiva- tion of the vine wheresoever its fruit will ripen. But whether the Grape-vine is a native of Asia, and has followed the footsteps of man from the shores of the Caspian Sea, and "in- tertwined its tendrils with civilization and refinement in ever}' age," or whether the thousands of varieties that now exist spring from different primordial forms or species, certain it is that, although the Grape-vine may be found in Europe from the Tropic of Cancer to the Baltic Sea, and in America from the Gulf to the Lakes, the vine is never- theless peculiarly the growth of definite cli- matic conditions ; so much so that even in its most adapted climate there are often seasons if not of actual failure, at least of an imper- fect development of its fruit. From long and careful observations of temperature and moisture, in years of success and failure, we have finally arrived at some definite conclu- sions respecting the meteorological influences affecting the grape.* 1st. No matter bow excellent the soil, if there is a le8s average than fifty-five degrees, Fahr., of temperature for the groiving months of April, May and June, and a less average than sixty-five degrees for the maturing months of July, August and September, there can be no hope of success ; and where the tempera- ture averages sixty-five degrees for the former months and seventy-five for the latter, other conditions being equal, fruit of the greatest excellence can be raised, and wine of the greatest body can be produced. f 2d. When there is an average rainfall of six inches for the months of April, Ma}^ and June, and an average of 5 inches (126 mm.) * James S. Lippincott: Climatology of American Grapes.— /rf. Geography of Plants— C/. S. Agr. JReports, 1862 and 1863— Dr. J. Stayman: The Meteorological In- fluences aftVcMng the Grape. + In both hcinisiiticrcs tiie profitable culture of the vine ceases within 'M) dcurees of the Equator, unless in very elevated situations, or in insular localities tempered by sea breeze. And in the old world, in Europe, it extends to about 50 degrees nortli. Along the Thames, without the walls, the old Roman Vineyards still put forth green leaves and crude clusters, in tlie plains of East Smithfield, in the fields of St. Giles' and on the site where now stands Hatton Gardens. The question whether or not real vineyards were grown, or real wine made from them in England, has been a very vexed question among the antiquaries. But it is scarcely possible to read Peggs' dispute with Daines Harrington in the Archa?ologia without decid- ing both questions in the affirmative. — See Archuiol., for the months of July, August and- Septem- ber, though other conditions were favorable, we cannot succeed in raising grapes. When the average rainfall for the first months is not more than four inches, and the average for the latter is not more than three inches (75 mm.), other conditions favorable; the hardy varieties can be cultivated with suc- cess. But where there is less average rain- fall than five inches for April, May and June, and a less average than two inches in Jul}. August and September, all other conditions being favorable, fruit of the best quality can be raised, and wine of the greatest body and excellence can be made. The humiditj^ of the atmosphere in some countries, the dryness of the air in others, will, of course, materiallj' change the proportion of rainfall required for, or injurious to the grape. Here, a clear sky and dry atmosphere, high temperature and very little rainfall for the latter three months, and a less change of temperature than fifty degrees, Fahr., in twenty-four hours, any time of the year, are favorable conditions for success. With regard to the necessity of attention to the most advantageous climatic conditions, says Mr. William Saunders (the eminent su- perintendent of the Experimental Gardens of the U. S. Department of Agriculture). "It is enough to i-emark, that where these are favor- able, good crops of fruit are the rule, and that too, even in the absence of experience in cultivation ; but in unfavorable locations the application of the highest attainments in the art and science of grape culture, so far as relates to pruning manipulations or culture and management of soil, will not insure suc- cess. Grape culture has now reached a point from which but little further i^rogress can be made without a close recognition of the re- quirements of the i^lant, in connection with local climatic conditions, the most important being that of freedom from heavy dews (free- dom from those cryptogamic diseases — mil- dew and rot). The topographical configura- tion of a locality is of far more importance than its geographical formation. Where the vol. Ill, p. 53. An engraving of the Saxon wine press is given in Stkutt's Herda. Vineyards fell into dis- use, either by treaty with France, or GascOny falling into the hands of tlie English. But vineyards w re cultivated by private gentlemen as late as 1621. Our first wines from Bordeaux appear to have been im- ported al)out 1154, by the marriage of Henry II. with Eleanor of Aquitaine.— Fro»» "Harold," the last of the Sa.rou Kings, by Sir Edward Buluer Lytton, Bart. Vol. I, chapter IV. In the Southern hemisphere, the Cape of Good Hope iust falls within the latitude occupied by the grape. In the North it extends to Lake Superior and parts of Soutliern Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. But where the winter cold is extreme, it is necessary not only to cover with earth, but also to provide for a liberal covering of snow l)y placing wiridl)reaks of boards at intervals,, or ever-green boughs to collect and hold the snow. Localities. GRAPE MANUAL. Climate. 3 atmospheric conditions are favorable, satis- factory results may be obtained, even from poor soils, but in ungenial climates the very best soils will not guarantee success." Moreover, with our present and increasing facilities of transportation, grape culture on a large scale cannot be remunerative, except in favorable localities which will produce the best quality almost every 3'ear with certaintj'. Where the production is low in quality and quantit}', and often entirely fails, grape cul- ture may exist on a small scale for home use and market, but on a large scale it will not reward the vintner's labor, and would finallj^ be abandoned. As California in the West, so does Virginia in the East, and parts of Texas and Arkansas in the South, seem to possess the best localities for grape culture on a very large scale. But lately a locality has been found in the southwestern section of Missouri which promises to surpass most others east of the Rocky Mountains — uniting most advantageous atmospheric conditions (ozone), altitude and the proper soil — namely, the Ozark Mountains, which are no mountains, but mostly high rolling table lands, extend- ing through the southern tiers of her counties to Northwest Arkansas, reaching an altitude of l,oOO feet; being above the heavy, muggy atmosphere prevailing over the great Missis- sippi basin, and thereby indicating a com- parative freedom from rot and mildew, the great drawbacks of successful grape culture. There are only a few countries where the grape will, in favorable seasons, grow to per- fection, and there is no country in the world where all kinds of grapes would succeed. Species found in the lower latitudes will not flourish if removed further north ; the natives of higher altitudes will not endure the south- ern heat ; the Scuppernong cannot ripen north of Virginia ; the Fox grape of the North will scarcely grow in the lower regions of Carolina and Georgia ; a vine which produces delicious grapes in Missouri may become very inferior in the most favored localities of New Hampshire. Thus the climate, the mean temperature as well as the extremes, the length of the grow- ing season, the relative amount of rain, the ameliorating influence of lakes and large rivers, the altitude as well as the soil, have an almost incredible influence on various varieties of grapes; and a judicious choice of locations adapted to the grape, and of varieties adapted to our location, its climate and soil, is therefore of the first importance. " No one grape is suited to all localities; neither is there any one locality which is suited to all grapes ; and we must not expect that any one variety will be found possessing the most desirable qualities that will be suited to all localities." — G. W. Campbell. Wm. Saunders, Superintendent of U. S. Experimental Gardens at Washington, D. C, says: "'Our native grapes are destroyed by winter frosts because they have been sub- jected to mildew in summer, and it is only in special localities that all kinds grow well. The most generally cultivated grapes are confessed I3" not those of the best quality either for table or for wine." "The best grape climates are those where there are least dews, and wherever we find specially favored localities, we will find this partial or total exemption from heavy dews. This has long ago been demonstrated, and new grapes emanating from favored regions will fail to give entire satisfaction when grown in localities less favorably situated, and thus lead to disappointment. This is the reason for so many seemingly conflicting opinions regarding the merits of varieties, and it is unfortunate that these considera- tions are not better understood and recog- nized. When a j'oung grape-\ine loses its foliage by midsummer, and the green shoots' remain unmatured till frost, that variety might as well be discarded at once ; no known method of pruning, fertilizing or care in cul- tivation will help it." C. L. Watroiis. of Des Moines, Iowa, wrote in an excellent paper on "Testing New Fruits :" No one can safely commend a new fruit for general cultivation in an}' region until it has been well tested there under all usual conditions, nor until after thorough trial, for a period equal to the usual life of an individual of that species. But because a vine does not succeed in one place, it is no reason that it may not be of the greatest value in another which is suited to its character. Notwithstanding that over 1500 varieties are cultivated in P^urope, yet the number of kinds especially adapted to the different lo- calities is ver}' limited for each of them, and we seldom find more than three or four varie- ties to form the main bulk of the vineyards of the different sections ; each province, county or township even, having its own special favorites. This question of adapta1)ilitv to. soil and local climate is one of the greatest importance, and should be closely studied b}^ the intelligent grape grower if he would make its culture a success. No existing variety, and probably none that will ever be produced, is well adapted to general cultivation in more than a limited portion of this vast countr3\ This iimitation is not determined by isother- mal lines. Success or failure ot a variety de- pends not only on degrees of heat and cold ; 4 Native Grapes. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. The Pioneers. not only on earliness or lateness of seasons, however important factors these may also be. but on numerous causes, some of which we cannot, so far, suflicieutly understand and explain. We need but remember that the grapes we cultivate in the United States have originated from one or the other of several distinct species, or from crosses between some of their varieties, and that each of those na- tive species is found growing wild in certain limited portions of our country, and not at all in others. Thus the ivild Labrusca is a stranger to the low^er Mississippi Valley and westAvard. By observing what species grows in a locality, we may safel}^ assume that cul- tivated varieties of the same species will thrive best in that locality or its vicinity under otherwise projjcr conditions. Where the native species does not exist, its cultivated varieties may for a time promise excellent success ; but in many localities this promise ■will probabl}', sooner or later, end in disap- pointment. This has been our sad experi- ence even with the Concord, which is gener- ally considered the most reliable, healthy and hardy American grape. On the other hand this proposition seems to conflict with the fact that American vines of different species have been successf ull}^ trans- planted even to Europe. But it would be a great mistake to believe that they would suc- ceed in all parts of that continent. It was found, on the contrary, that there also some of our varieties which succeed well in one por- tion of France, for instance, entirely failed in others ; and this only proves that we may find in far-off foreign lands localities which exact- 1}' correspond in soil, climate, etc., with cer- tain localities in our own country, and where this is the case, well and good ; but where these are different the results are unsatisfac- tory. In evidence we quote from the report of the commission, composed of some of the best French authorities, to the International Phylloxera Congress, in Bordeaux, (Oct., 1882). After giving a detailed report of their observations in the principal vine3'ards of France where American vines have been planted, they say, "But they (these resisting American vines ) do by no means succeed equally well in all locations. The nature of the terrain and the climate must be taken into serious consideration. But was it not one of the great didiculties with the French vines to know which variety suited such or such soil or aspect? How many failures were the consequence of ])ad selection ! It is, of course, the same with American vines, com- ing from widely different conditions of tem- perature, humidity and altitude." Unfortunately, this has been and is even now l)ut insufficiently understood. Indigenous wild grapes were found at the discovery of this new world ; the legend tells us that when the Norsemen first disct)vered Ibis country', " Hleif Krickson " called the land Vineland. As early as 15G4 wine was made by the first colonists in Florida from the native grape. The Pilgrim fathers saw vines in abundance at Plj'mouth. " Here are grapes, white and red, and very sweet and strong also," wrote Jos. Edward Winslow in 1621. Rev. Fr. Higginson, writing in 1(329 from the Massachusetts Colony says "Ex- cellent vines are here, up and down in the woods. Our governor has alread}' planted a vineyard, with great hope of increase." Thus, during the previous centuries grapes were cultivated, and wine has occasionall}' lieen made in America from native grapes ; (the French settlers near Kaskaskia, Ills., made, in 1769, one hundred and ten hogsheads of strong wine from wild grapes) —"but neither the (juality of the wine nor the price obtained for it offered sutlicient inducement to perse- vere. ' ' — Buchanan. The European grape, Vitia Vinifera. was, therefore, considered the only true tvine grape. In 16.30, a London company sent French vig- nerons into the Virginia Colony to plant grape- vines which they had imported for the purpose : the poor vignerons were unjustly blamed for their failure. In 1633 Wm. Penn vauily tried to introduce and cultivate European varieties in Pennsylvania. In 1790 a Swiss Colony, grape growers from Lake Geneva, tried to raise grapes and make wine in Jessamine County, Kentucky, but their hopes were soon frustrated; their "labor and fund— $10,000. a large amount in those days — were lost ; and only when they commenced to cultivate an indigenous grape, which, however, they sup- posed to be from the Cape (see description of Alexander)., they had somewhat better suc- cess. About twenty years later (1820) the Cataicba and Isabella were introduced, (see description). These two varieties may be considered the principal pioneers of Ameri- can grape culture ; but though excellent and successful at that time in many localities and praised by song, they did not satisfy those who were acquainted with the superior quality of the European grape and did not fully meet the demands of relined taste, neither for the table (market) nor for wine, (our native wines were specially decried by importers), and the production of neiv grapes by forced crossing and hybridization was scarcely known. Our most esteemed veteran, Geo. W. Campbell of Ohio, can rememl)er when no grapes were known in the lake region of Ohio but the wild Fox and the Frost grapes European Grapes. GRAPE MANUAL. Their Failure. 5 of the forest ; hence the introduction and planting of foreign grapes and their seedlings was still looked for. The attempts with Ger- man, French and Spanish vines, made again and again, proved failures. Hundreds of thousands (comprising many different sorts) of the l)est European vines were imported, but they all perished ''from the vicissitudes of the climate." Thousands of failures are recorded ; not one of durable success ; and Downing was fully justified in saying {Hor- ticulturist., Jan., 1851), "The introduction of the foreign grape into this country for open vine3^ard culture is impossible. Thousands of individuals have tried it — the result in every ease has been the same — a season or two of promise, then utter failure."* While this fact could not be denied, the cause remained a mystery. All pronounced the European grape as " unsuited to our soil and climate ;" all attributed its failure to that cause. But we, and doubtless many others with us, could not help thinking that "soil and climate" cannot be the sole causes; for this vast country of ours possesses a great many locations where soil and climate are quite similar to those of some parts of Europe where the Vinifera flourishes. Is it reason- able to suppose then, that none of the many varieties which are grown in Europe under such varied climatic conditions, from Mainz to Naples, from the Danube to tiie Rhone, should find a congenial spot in these United States, embracing almost every climate of the temperate zone? If soil and climate were so unsuited, how is it that the young, ten- der European vines grow so well, so promis- ing of success, for a few seasons ; in large cities sometimes even for several years? How explain the fact that the finest European varieties of other fruits, the pear for instance, are successfully grown here in some locali- ties, and that, but for the curculio, the Reine Claude and German Prunes would flourish here as well as there? Slight differences of soil and climate might well produce marked differences in the constitution of the vine, * Always excepting California, whifli was then almost unknown, but wiiich is now tlie si't'atest wine-procluc- injr State of tliis counti'y. Tliere, from the counties bordering the Bay of San Francisco down to Colorado River, several liundrod varieties of the best Eurojiean jjrapes are successfully cultivated; and even since the appearance of the Phylloxera, evidently introduced from Europe on imported vines, American arapes are not in demand there, except for tlie pui'nosc of t^raftlns thereon European varieties. Recently the Soitdan grape, a vine fllscovererl on the banks of the Niger in Africa, has been introduced into California. This peculiar vine is an «/)/(««?, but has a tuberous perennial root. The seetls are much like those of other gi'apes; the leaves reseml)le some Rotundifolia varieties of the S. A. S. This Soudan grape belongs to a genus (juite distinct from the true Vitis. Species of that kind were dissemi- nated in the tropic regions of Asia, Afi'ica lin New Hol- land) and even in Mexico; but tlieir fruit is without value. Besides their culture is quite impossible In the temperate zone perhaps also somewhat change the flavor and quality of the grapes, but could not sulTi- ciently account for their absolute failure. Nevertheless most of our learned horticultur- ists looked then for no other cause ; they even went so far as to teach that "if we really wished to acclimate the foreign j^rape here, we must go to the seeds, and raise two or three new generations in the American soil and climate." In obedience to these teach- ings, numerous fruitless attempts have been made here to raise seedlings of the European grape that will endure our climate. Like their parents they seemed successful for a time* — to be soon discarded and forgotten. But, in absence of any satisfactory reason for these failures, it is quite natural that renewed at- tempts were and are continually madc.t In the spring of 1867, we ourselves imported from Austria about 300 rooted vines (Velt- liner. Blue Baden, Riesling, Tokay, UvaPana, &c. ), not with expectations of success in open air culture, but with a view to discover, by careful observation, the real cause of failure, and knowing the true cause, to be then, per- haps, able to obviate it. The vines grew splendidly, but during the svimmer of 1869, though bearing some beautiful fruit, their foliage l)egan to wear a yellow, sickly appear- ance. In 1870 many were d} ing and we al- most despaired of discovering the cause, when Prof. C. V. Riley, then our State Entomolo- gist, informed us that the discovery had just been made in F'rance by Planchon and Lich- tenstein, that the serious grape disease which had attacked their noble vineyards was caused b}' a root-louse (Phylloxera), which bears a close resemblance to our American grapeleaf- * Among the seedlings of foi-eign grapes raised in the U. S., which ol)tained a name and fame, are: Brinki^e and Emita', raised by Peter Raabe of Philadelphia; Bhaxdywini;, originated near Wilmington, Del.; Ka- tarka and Mont(H>mery, or Merritt's Seedling, raised l)y Dr. W. A. Royce of Newburg, N. Y. To these belong also Clara and Weehawken, (see description). N. Grein of Hermann, Mo., introduced, about twenty years ago, some very good new grapes, which he claimed (and honestly believed) to have raised from seed of tlie German Riesling. '1 hey proved to be not seedlings of the European Riesling at all, but of the American Tay- lor grape, and are now known as Mis.souri Riesling, Grein's Golden, &c., (see these varieties). George Has- kell, a most persevering experimenter, says: "I raised many hundred vines from seeds of ditferent foreign grapes. These seeds were planted under glass, and the vines remained in the house two years, when they were removed to the open air. None of tliem proved healthy * * * iliey all died in a few years, though well cov- ered in winter. + The only satisfactory method of obtaining the fine foreign grapes in this country, east of the Rocky Moun- tains, is under glass, by the use of the grapery. This, however, so far, is done on a very limit d scale only, as a luxury for the table; and even there the roots of the vines in the outside horder are exposed to the danger of l)eing infested l)y tlie Phylloxera; so that vines graft- ed on American roots should be used. Those who de- sire and can afford to enjoy this luxury we refer for in- formation to Peter Henderson's excellent books on gardening. All our remarks on grape culture refer only to the States east of the Rocky Slountains, unless otherwise expressly stated. 6 The Phylloxera. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. American Species. gall-louse, au insect long kuown here, lu 1871 and since, Prof. Riley often visited our vineyards, as we gave him full permission and eheerfully assisted him to unearth both dis- eased and health}' vines, native and foreign, of e7er3-kind, in order to examine their roots and to study the question. By his observa- tions and those of Prof. Plauchon, made by both in this countr}' as well as in France, and afterwards confirmed and verified by all prominent naturalists, the identity of the American insect with the one discovered in France, and of the two types, the gall and the root-lice, has been substantiated. Thus, the principal cause of the absolute failure of European vines in this country has been dis- covered, but no satisfactory remedy has been found. So far, it seems impossil)le to destroy or to guard against this insect enem}' ; while the vigorous roots of our American vines en- }oj a relative immunit}' from its injuries, the pest thrives on the tender roots of the Euro- pean vines, which readily succumb. The French Commission, in its report to the Viticultural Congress, held at Montpel- lier, Oct., 1874, came to the conclusion that "In presence of the non-success obtained from all attempts made since 1868, with a view to preserve or cure our vines, and feel- ing that after six years of efforts in this direction, no process except submersion* has been found effective, manj^ persons are quite discoui-aged, and see in the American vines, whether justly so or not, the only plank of safety." Since that time, wheresoever the most careful, practical grape-growers and most scientific naturalists met and exchanged their views, as at the International Congress helil at Lyons, France, and at Saragossa, Spain, in 1880; at Bordeaux in 1881, the leading principle established has been : " that the Phylloxera cannot be exterminated where it once infests the vineyards, nor can its in- troduction 1)6 prevented by any precautionary measures ; but that there are some means whereb}', in spite of the insect, we maj' yet save our vine3'ards from destruction, and en- joy their richly paying returns ; and that the most practical, the simplest, cheapest and surest means is by planting the resisting American grapes." Alread}'^ millions of American grape-vines are growing in France, * Some Insecticides are now believed to be of service, if correctly applied and under certain favorable condi- tions, in prolonKini? the life of vines which are infested by llic Phylloxera. hundreds of thousands in Spain, Italy, Hun- gar}-, etc. California also imported manj- cuttings of Riparia Vines to graft thereon their European (Vinifera) sorts which suc- ceed there on our Phylloxera-resisting stock. In Feb., 1894, Senator Fair purchased from us half a million of such cuttings for his new 1000-acre vineyards near Lakeville, Cal. How much more, then, must we look to species which we find indigenous here, and to their descendants, for success in grape culture.* A knowledge of the distinctive permanent characters of our species, and a proper classi- fication of our varieties, referable to them, is of far more importance than is generally sup- posed.! Thirty-five years ago Robert Bu- chanan wrote in his book on the culture of the grape: " The perfection of a definite ar- rangement of all our varieties must remain for future labors, but it is to be hoped an end so desirable will not be lost sight of." And while many grape-growers may skip over the following pages as useless, we hope that some of them will thank us for em- bodjang in this catalogue the valuable treatise on The True Grape-Viues of the United States by the late Dr. Engelmonrt. and the "Classi- fication of the Wild Grapes of North Amer- ica," by Prof. T. V. Munson. * While our Horticulturists zealously work with confi- dent hopes to produce, from our indigenous species and tlieir hybrids, varieties which will equal those of Europe, it is meet tliat we do not ignore the views of foreign Viticulturists who visit this country with the special purpose to study tliis question and examine tlie American grape. We translate from " Une Mission Viticole en Amerique " par Pierre Yiala, Professor of Viticulture, Montpellier, France, 1889: " The reputation acquired l^y certain new American vines was the un- fortunate cause of tlieir introduction in France. On my return from the United States I was convinced that we have to count on American grafting stock, bearing our (European) varieties, for the reconstruction of our vineyards and tlie preservation of the legitimate repu- tation to the French wines. This impression which I brought with me from the United States, and formed since in France, has verified my opinion more and more that no American vine is susceptible of giving us prod- ucts equalling in quantity ana quality our indigenous (European) vines. The most meritorious direct Ameri- can producers are abandoned (discarded); tlie mainte- nance of their culture in tlie I'nited States is caused by the action of the mildew and lilack Rot whicli destroys t\\*i trmt of European vines. It may l)e that tlie lately discovered efficacious treatment of tliese diseases will determine tlie Americans of the South to constitute their vineyards, on Pliylloxera resisting stocks, with our (European) vines."— Tliis view msiy be inspired by patriotic pride of the Frencli Viticulturist; but it is still worthy of attention. t Even A. S. Fuller, in his excellent Treatise on Grape Culture, written in 1866, said: " Practically it is of little con.sequence what view is taken of these unusual forms (of distinct species, orniiirked varieties of the species), as the cultivator is interested in tliem only as varie- ties, and it is of no particular moment to him wliether we liave one hundred or only one native spec es." We are satisfied that he considers it of far more conse- quence now. Dr. Encjelmann. GRAPE MANUAL. Classification. CLASSIFICATION. TheTrue* Grape-vines of the United States. BY DR. G. ENGELMANN. LThis paper is an elaboration of his Synopses of Amer- ican Grape-vines, which appeared in Riley's Fourth Report of the State Entomologist of Missouri, 1872, the American Naturalist, 1872, VI. pp. .^39-542, Riley's Sixth Report 1874, pp. 70-76, and the second edition of the Bushberg Catalog-ue, 1875, pp. 4-11. Tlie French Trans- lation of same by Bazille and Planchon (Paris and Montpellier, 1876)— It has been entirely rewritten, add- ing many illustrations, etc., by Dr. G. Engelmann him- self for the third edition of the Bushberg Catalogue, 1883. This was his last work. He died on the 4th of Feb., 1884. It was reprinted in the "Botanical Works of the late Geo. Engelman, edited by Wm. Trelease and Asa Gray, Cambridge, Mass., 1887.] The Grape-vines are among the most varia- ble plants, even in their wild state, in which climate, soil, shade, humidity and perhaps natural hjdjridization, have originated such a multiplicity and such an intermixture of forms, that it is often difficult to recognize the original tj^pes and to refer the different given forms to their proper alliances. Only by carefully studjing a large number of forms from all pai'ts of the country, in their peculiar mode of growth and especially their fructifica- tion, or rather their seeds, are we enabled to arrive at any thing like a satisfactory disposition of tUese plants. (Table of Grape Seeds: Figs. 1-33, page 11.) Before I proceed to the classification of our Grape-vines, I deem it necessaiy to make a few preliminary remarks : The grape-vines cultivated in that part of the United States l3'ing east of the Kocky Mountains are all natives of the country, most of them picked up in the woods; some, per- haps, improved by cultivation ; and a few the product of natural or artificial hybridization. In that part of the country the wine grapes of the Old World can only be cultivated under glass ; but in New Mexico and California they have been successfully introduced by the Spaniards, and in the latter State a great many varieties are now extensively cultivated, and promise to make one of the great staples of that region ; but eastward and northward they have entirely failed, owing to the des- tructive effects of that now so well known and dreaded insect, the Phylloxera, of which more, further on. * We treat here only of the trvie grape-vines, with edi- ble berries. In the flowers of tiiese the small green petals do not expand, but coliere at the top, and sep- arating from their base, fall away together as a little five-lobed hood. The flowers, and conseciuently the fruit, are arranged in the well-lcnown clustei's (thyi-sus). Thus they are distinguished from the false grape-vines (botanically known as Ampelopsis and Cissiis), which often resemble the true grape-vines very much, but bear no edible berries. Their flowers expand regularly, opening at top, and are arranged In broad, flat-topped clusters (corymbs). All the true grape-vines bear fertile flowers on the stock, and sterile flowers on another separate stock, and are, therefore, called polygamous^ or, not quite correctly, diceciovs. The sterile plants do bear male flowers with abortive pistils, so that while they never pro- duce fruit themselves, they may assist in fertilizing the others ; the fertile flowers however, are hermaphrodites, containing l)oth organs — stamens and pistils — and are capa- ble of ripening fruit without the assistance of the male plants.* Real female flowers, with- out aii}^ stamens, do not seem ever to have been observed. Both forms, the male and hermaphrodite, or if preferred, those with sterile and those with complete flowers, are found mixed in their native localities of the wild plants, but of course, only the fertile plants have been selected for cultivation, and thus it happens that to the cultivator only these are known ; and as the grape-vine of the Old World has been in cultivation for thousands of years, it has resulted that this hermaphrodite character of its flowers has been mistaken for a botanical peculiarity^ by which it was to be distinguished, not only from our American grape-vines, but also from * These fertile plants, however, are of two kinds; some are perfect hermaphrodites, with long and straight stamens around the pistil; the others bear smaller stamens, shorter than the pistil, which soon bend down- ward and curve under it; these may be called imperfect hermaphrodites, approaching females, and they do not seem to l)e as fruitful as the perfect hermapnrodites, unless otherwise fertilized. In the following illustrations of the VARIOUS FORMS OF GRAPE FLOWERS are shown the difl'erent forms of grape blossom, life size and enlarged: (Original drawing by T. V. JMunson.) Fig. 38. Fig. 39. Fig. 40. Fig. 38. — Perfect Hermaphrodite, self-fertilizing, with long, erect stamen (filament) and anthers. Fig. 39. — Imperfect Hermaphrodite or Pistilate, not self-fertilizing, witli smaller, shorter stamens, the fila- ment becoming recurved. Fig. 40. — Male or Staminate, Non Pistilate, with larger pollen bearing anthers. Pistil, none. It is proper here, to insist on the fact that nature has not produced the male plants without a definite object; and this oljject, without any doubt, is found in tlie more perfect fertilization of the hermaplirodite flowers, as it is a well estal)lislied fact that such cross fertilization produces more abundant and healthier fruit. Vine growers miglit take a liint from these observations, and plant a few male stocks in their vineyards, say 1 to 40 or 50 of tlieir fertile stocks, and miglit expect from such a course healthier fruit, which would probably resist rot and other diseases better than fruit grown in the ordinary way. I would expect such beneficial in- fluence especially in all varieties that have sliort stamens, such as the Taylor. Male stocks can be easily obtained, either in the woods or from seeds. It is of course understood that the males ought to belong to the same species (or better, to the same variety) as the fertile plants to be benefitted by their pollen. Eu- ropean vine growers may also profit by this suggestion. n^sca, but it is not cultivated here, nor is VvJpina {Ro- tundifolia), which is probably the latest of all. F. Candirans apparently blooms about the same time that Labrusca does. Riparkt begins to open its flowers about St. Louis three to five weeks earlier than the first blossoms of ^stivah's are seen in the same localit3^ In favorable situations and in early seasons they make their appearance in this vicinity as early as April 25th, at other seasons sometimes as late as Ma}^ loth, or even 20th, on the average about Ma}' 10th ,^ and generally about the time when the Aca- cias (Black Locusts) bloom, both filling the atmos])here with the sweetest perfumes. Cor- d {folia, and, after this, Cinerea. on the con- trary, bloom from the last days in May to (in late seasons) the middle of June, when that weed among trees, the fetid Ailantus (mis- named the tree of Heaven), exhales its nau- seous odors and the beautiful Catalpa expands its gorgeous bunches of flowers. F. Pahnata (Vahl), of w'hich we do not yet know much, seems to be the latest flowering Grape-vine with us, flowering even after Cinerea. Thus we are not likely to have an}^ Gra])e-vines in flower here before April 25th or after June 20th. One of the botanical characters of the Grape-vine is found in the needs. The bunches may be larger or smaller, looser or more compact, branched (shouldered) or more simple, conditions which, to a great extent, depend on variety, soil and exposure ; * Compare note on page 7 with illustration of flowers, Fis. 38-40. 10 Dr. Encjelmann. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Classification. the berries ma}' be larger or smaller, of dif- ferent color and consistency, and contain fewer or more seeds (never more than four), but the seeds, though to some extent varia- ble, especially on account of their number* and mutual pressure, where more than one is present, exhibit some reliable differences. The big top of the seed is convex or rounded, or it is more or less deeply notched. The thin lower end of the seed, the beak, is short and abrupt, or it is more or less elongated. On the inner (ventral) side are two shallow, longitudinal irregular depressions. Between them is a ridge, slight where there are one or two seeds, or sharper where the seeds are in threes or fours ; along this ridge the raphe (the attached funiculus or cord) runs from the hihun, at the beak, over the top of the seed, and ends on its back in an elongated, oval or circular well-marked spot, called by botanists ehalaza. This raphe is on that ridge represented by a slender thread, which on the top and back of the seed is entirely indis- tinct, or scarcely perceptible, or it is more or less prominent, like a thread or a cord. In our American species tliese characters seem pretty reliable, but in the varieties of the Old World Grape-vine (^Vin(fera)^ several thou- sands of years removed from their native sources, the form of the seed has also under- gone important modifications, and can no longer be considered so safe a guide as in our species. But different as these seeds are among themselves they have a character in common, which distinguishes them from all our Ameri- can Grape seeds ; their l)eak is narrower and usually longer, and their large ehalaza (the area on the back of the seed) occupies the upper half and not the centre of the seed ; in the American species the beak is shorter and more abrupt ; the ehalaza, usualW smaller, and often not circular, biit narrower, is placed in the centre of the back. Any one who wishes to satisfy himself of this need only compare a raisin seed with an^^ of our grape seeds, if the following cuts are not plain enough. The size and weight of the seeds vary greatly in the different species ; thus La- brnsea and Caiidicaini have the largest, Cin- erea and Riparia the smallest seeds ; but even in the wild state we find variation, e. g., in jEstivaJis, still more in GordtfoUa. and most in Riparia. In Vinifera, the European grape, however, the variations are much greater, greater even sometimes than our *A siiif^le seed is always thicker, plumper, more rounded; two seeds are flattened on the inner, rounded on the outer side; three or more seeds are more slender and angular; these different variations may often be found in berries of the same bunch. figures show. Some have laid stress on the color of the seeds, which varies between brown and j-ellowish, but that seems to me to go too far for our purposes. The cuts of 33 Grape seeds, here repre- sented, illustrate the different characters which have been mentioned above. The fig- ures are magnified four times (four diam- eters), accompanied b}'^ an outhne of natural size. They all represent the back of the seed. Figs. 1 and 2, Vitis Labrusca, seeds of wild plants ; Fig. 1 from the District of Columbia, and Fig. 2 from the mountains of East Tennessee. The seeds of the cultivated varieties do not differ from these ; they are all large, notched on top : chahtza generally depressed and no raphe is visible in the groove which extends from the ehalaza to the notch. Figs. 3 to 5 represent seeds of cultivated forms, which all show evident signs of hybridity and ac- knowledge the parentage of Lahrusca bj'' the form and size of the seed as well as by the irregular arrangement of the tendrils. Fig. 3 is the seed of the Taylor Grape, which stands near Riparia. Fig. 4 is the seed of the Clinton, which has, per- haps, the same parents. Fig. 5, seed of the Deki- loare Grape, which possibly may be a hybrid of Labrusca with Vinifera. Figs. 6 to 8, Vitis Candicans; seed similar to those of Labrnsca, but broader, generally with a shorter beak, and less distinctly notched. Figs. 6 and 7 are from Texas, the latter broader and with a broader beak ; Fig. 8 comes from South Florida, and is still broader and shorter. Fig. y, Vitis Cariba'a. similar to the last, but smaller; seeds short and thick, and deeply notched. Figr. 10 and 11, Mtis CaUfurnica, seeds often smaller, scarcely or not at all notched, raphe in- distinct or quite invisible; ehalaza narrow and long. Fig. 10 represents a single seed (one only in a berry) from near San P'rancisco; Fig. 11 is one of four seeds from San Bernardino, in Southern California. Fig. 12, Vitis Monticola; seed very similar to those of the last species, thick, notched, without a distinct raphe, and with a long and narrow ehalaza. Figs. 13 and 14, Frtts Arizonica, from the Santa Rita Mountains; seeds small, slightly notched, with a more or less distinct but flat raphe. Figs. 15 to 17, Vitis uEstivalis; seeds rather larger, cord-lide raphe and more or less circular ehalaza strongly developed; all the seeds are from wild grapes gathered about St. Louis ; the seeds of the cultivated forms, Northern and Southern, are similar. Figs. 15 and 16 are from berries with only one or two seeds; Fig. 17 is narrower, and from a larger four-seeded berrv. Fig. lS,Vitis Cinerea, a seed similar to the last, with the same strong raphe, but smaller in size, and often single. Figs. 19 and 20, Vitis Cordifolia; seeds also sim- ilar to the two last, but raphe not quite so prom- inent, mostly single or in twos, rarely more in a berry; Fig. 19 comes from a larger berry, with more seeds, found near St. Louis; Fig. 20 is a single seed, from the District of Columbia. Fig. '2\,Vitis PaJmata; seed large, almost globose, with a very short beak, a narrow ehalaza, no raphe visible, top slightly depressed. Figs. 22 to 25, Vitis Riparia; seeds similar to the last, but smaller, though quite variable in size. TABLE OF GRAPE SEEDS. 11 V. I-ABRUSCA. Fig. 1. Fig. 2. TAYLOR. CLIXTON. DELAWARE. V.CaXDICANS. Fig. 3. Fig. 4, Fig. 5. Fig. G. V. CANDICANS. Fig. 7. Fig. 8 V. CARIBEA. V.CALIFORNICA. V. MOXTICOLA. V. ARIZOXICA. Fig. 9. Fig. 10. Fig. 11. Fig. 12, Fig. 13. (1) M@ A^ ^® V. ARIZOXICA. V. ^STIVALIS. CIXEREA. Fig. 14. Fig. 15. Fig. Ifi. Fig. 17. Fig. 18. V. CORDIF.OLIA. Fig. 19. Fig. 20. V. PALM AT A. Fisr. 21. V. RIPARIA. Fig. 22. Fig. 23. V. RIPARIA. V. RUPESTRIS. Fig. 24. Fig. 25. Fig. 2G. Fig. 27.' V. VINIFERA. VITIS YIXIFERA. V. VULPIXA. Fi-. 28, Mummy, Grape. Fig. 29. Brusca.- Fig. 30, Riesling. Fig. 31, Cliasselas. Fig.32,Bl. Hamb'g. Fig.33. 12 Dr. Engelmann. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Classijication. The seeds all come from wild j)lants; Figs. 22 aud 23. from Goat Island on the Niagara Falls; Fig. 22 a single broad seed ; Fig. 23 from a three-seeded berry ; Fig. 24 from a two-seeded berry from the shores of Lal^CrtH(Zo;?e. The West India grape ; rare in Florida. 4. ViTis CALiFOKNiCA,i?'^«(/i!f2 to 2 lines long; flower bunches large and loose, on long stems; berries rather small (4-5 lines through), black, without bloom: seeds one or two, very large and plump, rounded, with very short beak, notched on top, without a visible raphe. Our plant is readily distinguished from Eiparia by the thick diaphragm, the red branches, its late llowering and its bloomless, late ripening berries; from Cordifnlin the form of the leaves and its ready growth from cuttings, easily separate it. 11. Vitis Ripakia, Michaux, the grape- vine of the river banks, has lately acqnired a great deal of importance, as it has now be- come the principal grape-vine relied on in France for the renovation of their failing vinej'ards for which its vigorous growth, adapted to almost all climates, its perfect resistance to the insect, its easy growth from cuttings, and its ready taking of grafts, seem to peculiarly fit it. This species climbs over bushes and small trees, or trails over the rocks on our river banks. It is also found inland, always near water, on larger trees, where its trunk may become six inches tliick. The branchlets are rounded, not angled; the diaphragms very thin (^ to ^ line thick) ; the stipules large (2-3 lines long) and very thin, and persist longer than in most other species ; leaves of a light green, shining, glabrous or often hairy beloAv, with a wide, rounded, or even truncate sinus ; they are more or less tri-lobed, mar- gined with large, sharp-pointed teeth. The bunches are mostly small and compact ; berries small (four or rarely five lines in diameter), black, with a bloom, sweet and juicy, scarce!}' pulp3' ; seeds (Figs. 22 to 25) obtuse or slightly notched, with a narrow chalaza, raphe indistinct or very thin.* . It has the widest geographical distribution of any of our grape-vines, and is the hardiest of them all. It extends northward to Lake St. Jean, ninety miles north of Quebec, and to the banks of the Upper Mississippi in Minnesota, and the shores of Lake Superior ; in the South it is common on the banks of the Ohio and in Kentuck^^ Illinois, Missouri and Arkansas,! and in the Indian Territor}'. I have not seen it from Louisiana or Texas, but a form of it is found in the Rocky Mount- ains of Colorado and New Mexico, and per- haps in southern Utah. It is the earliest flowering species about St. Louis, according to season, between April 25th and Ma}^ loth, and matures earlier than an}' other. In St. Louis it used to be brought to market, before we had cultivated grapes, sometimes as early as July 1st, from the rocky, sun-exposed banks of the river below town, and was, indeed, known as the "June Grape." From that time on ripe fruit is found, according to locality, through August and September. It is singular that our vintners, as far as I can learn, have never made wine from this species, nor tried to cultivate and improve it. The * The French now distinguish several types of Ripa- ria, different somewhat in their minor cliaracteristics. + A peculiar form of Riparia is a plant wliich I found fifteen years ago in tlie Ijotauic garden of Berlin, under the name of Vitis Solo7iis, and al)out the history of which nobody seems to have known any thinjr. Lately this plant has been taken up in France with that zeal so characteristic to that nation, as sDnietliintr jjossilily of particular interest for their viticultural pursuits. It is distiiiuuished from the ordinary form by the long and narrow, almost incised, crowded teeth of the scar- cely three-li)l)e(l leaves. The name is undoubtedly a. corruption of " Long's," and the plant comes from the Upper Arkansas river, where Major Long, on his returu from his expeudition to the Rocky Mountains, found, as he reports, such excellent grapes. Seeds may have been brought home and the plant raised as ''Longs." A manuscript of the viticulturist Hronner, preserved in tlie Carlsruhe library, sjjeaks of a certain grape- vine as " Long's, from Arlcansas," and it is reported tiiat Long's is still growing in the late Mr. Bronner's garden at Wislocb, near Heidelberg, and that it is indentical with Solonis. As an example of curious speculative interpretation it may be stated that some viticulturist liad read Solonis for Zanis (an oriental grape), and Arkansas for Caucasus. The French edition adds to this remark of Engel- mann, about tlie spe<'ious exijlanation of the name ".Solonis" that the gi'ajie observed by Major Long, is, no doubt, Vitis Ruiiestris and not the Vitis Solonis (as explained liy M. Lespiault, in Vignes Aniericaines, 1881 and by IManchon in same 1884). The existence of Vitis Solonis has also been discovered in the her- barium of the Botanical Garden of Brussels In 1835, already; (under the evidently erroneous name of Isabella I). See Munson's classification, series 3, and observations, page 24. Dr. Eitfjelmann. GRAPE MANUAL. Classification. 17 berries probably seem too small, and they may have expected better results from the larger fruits of ^-Estivalis; but the experiment might jet be made, and our woods might be exam- ined for larger-fruited varieties, which reallj-^ do occur, e. g. , along the Lakes and on Niagara, near Detroit, etc. As has been stated above, this species has been confounded with T^. Cordifob'a, to which indeed, it bears a certain resemblance; but the characters enumerated, especially those of the diaphragms, the stipules, the form of the leaf and its base, its flowering time, and above all the seeds, distinguish them as well &S any two species can be distinguished, even if the difficulty of one and the readiness of the other to grow from cuttings be not taken into account. 12. ViTis RuPESTRis, Scheele, mostly a low, bushy plant, often without an}', or with weak, deciduous tendrils, and not climbing,, under favorable circumstances becoming stouter and climbing pretty high ; branchlets rounded, diaphragm thicker than in Riparia^ but thinner than in other species ; leaves rather small (about three inches wide), broadly cordate, rarely very slightly lobed, mostly broader than long, usually somewhat folded together, with broad, coarse teeth, and commonly with an abruptly elongated point, glabrous, shining, of a very pale green color ; stipules almost as large as in last species, 2-2J lines long, thin ; berries small or middle-sized, sweet, and in very small bunches ; seeds obtuse, with a slender or almost invisible raphe. This grape vine, of very peculiar aspect, is .a native of the hilly country west of the Mis- sissippi river, from the banks of the Missouri to Texas, and is also found on the Cumber- land river near Nashville ; its favorable local- ities are gravelly banks or bars of mountain streams, overflowed in spring, more rarely {in Texas) on rocky plains. In Missouri it is called Sand grape, in Texas often on iiccount of its luscious fruit, Sugar grape ; with us it flowers soon after Raparia and ripens in August, and is said to make a good wine. In France the V. Rupestris is used, like the last species, as a grafting stock for French vines ; it grows easily from cuttings, iind is said to make vigorous plants, perfectly resistant to the insect. ViTis ViNiFEKA, Linnaeus. Here would be the place to introduce the grape-vine of the Old World, as it is most nearly allied to tiie last enu- merated species, especially to T'. lliparia. Though many of its cultivated varieties bear berries as large, or even larger, than those of any of our American grape-vines; other cultivated forms, and especially the true wine-grapes, those from which the best wines are obtained, and also the wild or naturalized ones, have fruit not much larger than that of the above named native species. This plant, together with the wheat, belongs to those earliest acquisitions of cultivation, the history of which reaches beyond the most ancient written records. Xot only have the sepulchres of of the mummies of ancient Egypt preserved us its fruit (large sized berries) and seed, but its seeds have even been discovered in the lacustrian habi- tations of Northern Italy. It is a mooted question where to look for the native country of this plant, and whether or not we owe the different varieties of our present Vinifera to one or to several coun- tries, and to one or to several original wild species, which, by cultivation through uncounted ages, and by accidental and repeated hybridiza- tion, may have produced the numberless forms now known. These remind us forcibly of the numerous forms of our dog, which we cannot trace, either, but which can scarcely be derived from a single (supposed) original wild species. Director Kegel, of iSt. Petersburg, ascribes them to the intermingling of a few species, well known in their wild state at this day. The late Prof. Braun, of Berlin, suggested that they are the offspring of distinct species yet found wild in many parts of Southern Europe and Asia, which thus he considered not the accidental offspring of the cultivated plants, as is generally believed, but the original parent stock. 1 may add, from my own investigations, that the grape-vine which inhabits the native forests of the low banks of the Daimbe, "bottom-woods," as we would call them, from Vienna down into Hungary, well represents our T'. Cordifolia, with its stems three, six and nine inches thick, and climbing on the highest trees, its smooth and shining, scarcely lobed leaves, and its small, black berries. On the other hand, the wild grape of the thickets of the hilly countries of Tuscany and Rome, with ita lower growth, somewhat cottonj^ leaves, and larger and more palatable fruit, which " don't make a bad wine," as an Italian botanist ex- pressed himself to me, reminds us, notwith- standing the smaller size of the leaves, of the downy forms of Biparia, perhaps of some yEsti- rnUs. It was known to the ancients as Labrusca a name improperly applied by science to an American species, and is called by the natives to this day Bnisca. The grape-vines of the coun- tries south of the Caucasus Mountains, the an- cient Colchis, the reputed orginal home of these plants, greatly resemble the Italian plant just described. The European Grape-vine is characterized by smoothish, and, when young, shining, more or less deeply, live or even seven-lobed leaves ; lobes pointed and sharply toothed; seeds mostlj^ not- ched at the upper end; beak elongated; raphe indistinct; chalaza broad, high up the seed. In some varieties the leaves and branchlets are hairy and even downy when young; the seeds vary considerably in thickness and length, less so in the shape of the raphe. It is well known that the plant grows readily from cuttings, and that it ejisily .Mnd almost invariably succumbs to the attacks of the Phylloxera, which, accidentally introduced into France, probably with American vines, has done such immense damage in that country and in the rest of Europe, probably since 1863 (though only discovered as the virulent enemj' in 1868), and is spreading more and more. In California, where thus far the Vimfera has been successfully cultivated, the insect also begins 18 Dr. Engelmann. BU8HBERG CATALOGUE. Classification. to make its appearance in some localities. 'J hat it was the CMnse of the complete failure in all the effoits to })]iint the European vine east of ihe Rocky Mountains, is now well known. 13. ViTts Vt;LPiNA, Liur a^iis ( better known as V. ROTVNPiFOLiA, Michaux), the Sovthern Fox grajje, BtiUace ov EuJlit grape, or Musca- dine of the Southern States, is entirely dif- ferent from all our other grape-vines, and is mentioned here only to complete the list of our species. It is too tender for our climate, and never flowers or fruits here. It is found in damp thickets or on mountain slopes, some times a low bush, and again climbing very high, with entire, never forked, tendrils ; branchlets without any diaphragm (see Fig. 37) ; leaves small (two, or at most, three inches wide), rounded, heart-shaped, firm and glossy, dark green, smooth, or rarely slightly hairy beneath, with coarse and large or broad and bluntish teeth. The bunches are very small, of few very large berries, which fall off singly, like plums. The pecu- liar seed has been figured and described above (page 11, Fig. 33). In the South some of the varieties are highly esteemed, espec- ially the White Scuppernong. HYBKIDITY. Plants, which are so intimately related among themselves, are apt to hybridize, and their off- spring is usually fertile, not like many hybrid animals (the mule) or plants incapable to prop- agate. We have a number of artificial hybrids among grape-vines, whose history is well known, and which bear as well as the true species, and their seeds are fertile. But we also find other vines in the woods or in vineyards, which, from their characters, we must conclude to be spon- taneous hybrids. There is, of course, a good deal of experience and judgment necessary to decide what may be justly claimed to be a hybrid, and what only a variety within the limits of some variable .>^pecies, and the opinions of different persons may honestly vary on these points. But whoever has studied the great variability of many plants will hesitate long before he calls to his aid the often fanciful help of hybridity in the ex- planation of doubtful forms. Where species are so well marked as e. g. Labrusca is, it is not dif- ficult to recognize some of its characters in a hybrid offspxdng, though the general looks of the questionable plant otherwise may not conform to our idea of Lahnisca at all; but in other cases, where species already stand near one another, the matter becomes much more ditiicult. But there is another way, unfortunately a very tedious one, to assist in such investigations, viz : to sow the seeds of hybrids and study their offspring; for it is a fact that seedlings of hybrids are apt to revert to, or at least to approach to. one or the other of the parents. One of the most striking examples of both positions here taken is furnished by the well-known Taylor or Bullit grape. The vigorous growth of this form, its thin diaphragms. its glossy, glabrous foliage, its small clusters of rather small berries entirely destitute of foxy taste, all seem to point to it as a cultivated varietv of Eqmria; but when we come to examine the tendrils we fine that they are irregular: some- times intermittent, sometimes more or less con- tinuous (I have seen six in succession, which can only point to Labrusca), and just so the seeds, differ from Biparia seeds by their great size andl their form (see page 11, Fig. 3). Now it so- happens that Taylor seeds have been planted by the million in Europe, in order to raise resistant stock for grafting, and the general experience is that one cannot find two seedlings in a hundred alike, and similar to the mother-plant; some approach the Biparia type, and others show the Labrusca parentage distinctly. Thus, to give onlj' one example, one of such seedlings — the now frequently cultivated Elvira — is a Taylor seedling^ with a close approach to Labrusca. It would further the study of our grape-vine& considerably if some of those that have the zeal,, the leisure and the opportunity, would institute such experiments with doubtful forms. Pursuing this interesting subject further, I may add that where nearly allied species grow near together, and bloom about the same time, they are more likely to hybridize than such species that are separated by wide space or different period of flowering. With all these considerations we must not forget that with the innumerable opportunities given everywhere for hybridiza- tions we find comparatively so few spontaneous hybrids in the vegetable world. Hybridization is an abnormal, I may say, an unnatural process, which is usually prevented by countless obstacles. If it were not so, we would meet with more hybrids in our woods and prairies than with genuine species; but how i-are are they, and what a find it is for a botanist to discover one ! * And this is the more to be wondered at, because the genital organs of the plants, though mostly united in one flower, are usually so organized that self- fertilization is made difficult, or is excluded, and that cross-fertilization is the rule. We may put it down as a law that honest nature abhor.s hybrid- ization. *Accidental wild Hybrids are very scarce, no doubts where the normal time of blooming of the species, such as Riparia, ^Estivalis and Clnerea, varies too much to make such crosses probable; but where you find dilferent species blooming simultaneously it is quite different. Friend Jaeger of Neosho, S. W. Missouri, tells us that there are localities in the Indian Territory where hybrids, between Riparia and Kupestris are more nu- merous than the pure type of either species; in Red river liottom, near Denison, Texas, he also found RipariaXCandicans very numerous, not to mention the many " Vifrnes Champin." Had Dr. Ensrelmann lived a little longer it would have been easy to change his- views about spontaneous hybrid grape-vines. GRAPE MANUAL. 19 EDITORS' INTRODUCTORY REMARKS TO THE CLASSIFICATION AND VITICULTURAL OBSERV>2s.TION S Upon the Native Species of American Grapes. BY T. V. MUNSON. Perhaps the first plant iioticed on the Continent of North America, even before tJohimbus and be- fore the Pilgrims, was the grape-vine; it gave to this country the name Vineland, and later, to part of it, that of Martha's Vineyard. And yet — said our late Dr. Geo. Engelraann* — yet, the grape-vine, many forms of which grow from Canada to the Rio Grande, and from Vir- ginia to California, are among the least thor- oughly known plants of North America. I have long devoted much attention to the grape-vines of my home — continues the great, modest botanist he ever was — but have become satisfied that no satisfactory solution can be ob- tained without the co-operation of the friends of botany throughout the whole country. . . . In order to arrive at satisfactory conclusions, it is necessary — said Dr. Engelmann — to study all the forms which present themselves in all their bear- ings and under different conditions in which they are found. Prof. T. V. Munson has taken up this botanical investigation, which Dr. Engelmann desired and pronounced to be necessary, where the latter has left it, and, certainly, no other man is as well qualified for the task as our friend Munson. He combines the scientific preparation! with the per- severance, love and devotion which its study de- mands, besides the knowledge and experience of the practical viticulturist and successful hybrid- izer. He has studied the grape herbaria in Har- vard, In the Academy of Science at Philadelphia * Botanical Works of the late George Engelmann, col- lected for Henry i^haw, Esq., edited by William Trelease and Asa Gray; p. 412. t Munson occupied a chair in the Sciences at the Ken- tucky State Agricultural College and was honored by the Government of France with the title of "ChtSvalier du Merite Agricole" and the decorations of the Legion of Honor. He is generally called and recognized as '•Professor Munson," and is now President of the State Horticultural Society of Texas, etc., etc.; ])ut he is not pleased with titles and needs none; we are pleased to call him simply "our friend Munson." and in the U. S. Department of Agriculture, as well as Engelmann's collection in the Missouri Botanical Garden, and has made besides his own most extensive collection, mostly raised to bear- ing vines from seed, through germination; and has observed the vines of nearly every species in their native habitat, while traveling, more than fifteen years, for their examination, thousands of miles in the United States. While highly ap- preciating Engelmann's classification as the best up to the time, yet Mr. Munson could not help finding it incomplete and embodying some errors. He had accumulated many facts unknown to Engelmann, who wrote himself that " our species vary to such a degree, that both scientific and non-scientific observers have never felt satisfied about them." The more our friend Munson studied the species, side by side, the more he felt s tisfied with his arrangement into series, as be- ing the best exhibit yet made of the natural affinities. And he has given the result of his re- search to the U. S. Department of Agriculture in a monograph on American grapes, which is to be published some day ; but it has, so far, failed to get the necessary appropriation. The entire series of colored plates, natural size, made by an artist from fresh specimens, are all complete — but there the work rests.* To publish the entire monograph with full de- scriptions and illustrations is a work most woi thy of the early attention of the Agricultural Depart- ment of our Government, for whose treasury the cost would be a mere trifle; whilst the value, the benefit to be derived from this work would be in- calculable. It would not merely be interesting to the botanical student, but of great practical im- portance, treating on the questions to what pur- pose the vine can serve, whether for table fruit or for wine, or for hybridizing, or as grafting stock ; what climate it can endure, what diseases one species may resist better than others. We wish and hope that it may be published soon ; in the meantime, friend Munson has permitted us to present to the readers of the Bushberg Catalogue a synopsis of his classification, with his own Viti- cultural Observations on some of our native species. (And we had some photo-engravings made, reduced, after his original plates, for this Grape Manual.) * At the World's Fair. 1893, In Chicago, Munson made the most complete botanical exhibit of the genus ever made, and lie presented it then to the U. S. Department of Agriculture to be a permanent display in the Divis- ion of Pomology. 20 EUSHBEliG CATALOGUE. CLASSIFICATION. (tknls. VITIS, Touknefout Specific No. Series 1. RIPARI^E. Vitis KuPESTRis, (Sheele) 1 Vitis YuLPixA (Linn?eus), better known as V. RiPARiA (Michaux)* 2 (V. Palmata.— Vahl). (Dr. N. L. Britton, curator of the Columbia College, Horbariuni, after visiting Europe in 1893. and examin- insi Linnaeus' orisrinal specimen of V. Vulpina, wrote nielliat it is certainly identical with V. liipariaMx., liius agreeing with .1. E. Planehon). Vitis Solonis, (Hort. Berol) 3 Vitis DoANiAXA, (Munson) 4 All excellent for hybridizing other species. Series 2. OCCIDENTALES. Vitis Arizouica, (Engelmann). 5 Caiion grape of Arizona. Var. glabra, (Munson). Vitis Girdiana, (Munson) The south California species. Vitis Californica, (Bentham). The north California .species. Series 3. CORIACE>?^. Vitis Champini, (Planehon) 8 Vitis Canclicans, (Engelmann) 9 " Mustang grape " of Texas. Vitis Coriacea, (Shuttlwortli) 10 Florida. Series 4. LABRUSC.E. Vitis Labrusca, (Linnaeus) 11 Series 5. iI':STIVALES. Vitis Vinifera, (Linnaius). European and Asiatic, (^0 * J'. J'nlpina. Conforming to tlie rules, now almost universally adopted among botanists, tit iipply the old- est name ever used by a botanist of standing, Munson gives preference to " V. Vulpina," being the earliest name, established by Linna:us; it was found to be cer- tainly identical with r. liiparia of Michaux. Origin- ally tlie V. Labr>isca was i)opularly known as the Nortli- ern .Muscadine and tlie V. Jiot'undifolia as Southern ISluscadine, while V. Cordifolia is commonly called Fox grape, and common people as well as l)()t anists regarded then the small sour grapes of New England as " t-orr/i- folia," i. e. Fox grapes, (after .Esop's well-lvnown fable). Hence the name " F«/y>(nrt," and Munson says: it had bet ter be observed, as the surest way out of confusion ; moreover, he considers tlie name V. Rparia (riverside grape) not very appropriate, as there are several species that grow along river banks. The editors of this catalogue beg to prefer the name r. Riparia, to which they will iver remain attached. Ena rid), V. SoJoiris, and T'. Doaniana (forming Series I), are leafing out. fiowering and ripening very early ; are very hard}'^, enduring severe cold, and the cuttings root witii the greatest ease. These species are easily recognized and dis- tinguished from each other b3'^ botanical characteristics (which most practical grape- growers are unwilling or unable to study, and which the limited space of this manual would scarcely permit). T^. R>ij)estris* has a greatly branched shrublike vine, a very short leaf, from base to point, with broad opening (sinus) ; bears small clusters of small, verj' tender-skinned berries, very juicy and ex- cessive in dark violet coloring matter. The}' have a fine vinous taste, with a slight poke- berry flavor. As a direct producer it is too light a cropper to be profitable, but in its hy- brid combinations it has given some excellent varieties for wine. Jaeger's No. 70 (now named "Munson")and my seedlings of same ("America" and "Early Wine") are ex- amples of Rupestris hybridized with one of the best of Lincecumii, found wild in South- west Missouri. Numerous hybrids of this species have been produced by J/r. Jaeger, of Neosho, Mo., Prof. MiUardet, of France, and I am now using them extensively as bases for fur- ther improvement in varied hj^brid combina- tions. The species has been extensively and satisfactorilj' used in France, as a resistant graft-stock for Vinifera varieties. In its wild state V. Rupestris grows along the borders and on the beds of gravel drift of small streams, which cease to run most of the sum- mer, but where permanent moisture is found not far below. In upland sand}^ soils in Northern Texas, where the long drouths dr}' the land out deeply, vines of this species soon die. Of hundreds of its vines planted b}' me in such soils, every one died within six 3^ears, after having grown A^er}^ thriftily for four years. Vines of this same kind, both from Southwest Texas and Missouri, were planted in different localities in such soil, with the same result, while in same lands the V. Lincecumii, native in such soils, are in most vigorous health, now eight years old. Hybrids of Rupestris and Lincecumii have endured quite well, but during the severest drouths show some weakening. It is remark- able that no form of rot attacks the fruit of Rupestris, and its hybrids have more resisting power than the variety subject to rot with which it may be hybridized. V. VuLPiNA, generall}' known asV. Riparia (figure reduced one-fourth from nature), is a much more rampant climber, with more pen- dulous habit than Rupestris ; the foliage is of a darker, clear, livelj' green ; leaves larger, with much longer, sharper teeth, opening at base much narrower ; berries are of about same size, but bearing a dense white bloom on surface when ripe, while Rupestris has little or none. The fruit is generall}' in * Fig. 41 of V. Rupestris, from nature, after Munson's collection, reduced. V. Riparia. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. 23 Fig. 42. VITIS VULPINA, Liima'us. (Fox Grape.) V. RIPARIA, Michaux. (Riverside Grape.) 24 Observations. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Riparia. larger, more compact clusters, and possessing both more acid and sugar. V. Riparia ranges fartliest north of an}' species, extending to So'* N. latitude, where winter temperature often reaches 40 degrees below zero (F.)- It was the first American species used in France as a resistant stock to graft upon, and is still very extensively used there and in other countries (lately also in California) where the Vinifera vines are grown.* Like Rupestris it does best in sandy soils, well drained, yei supplied with permanent moisture. In its hybrids with the larger Labrusca, or with Lincecumii and Vinifera hybrids, using the best varieties as a base, may the best grapes for the extreme Northwest be produced. V. SoLONis is a bushy, upright-growing species, of similar habit and liking with V. Bitjiestris, found along the banks of rivers and in beds of small streams of the Panhandle region of Northwest Texas and the eastern portion of New Mexico. In form of leaf and flavor of fruit it is closely allied toT". Ripuria. (Extract from the Third Edition.) * ViTis Riparia. — This most widely diffused American species of grape-vines was but imper- fectly known up to within a few years, even to botanists, so that they could not clearly dis- tingui>li V. Eiparia from V. Cordifolia ; and they were generally united under the one designation ''Cordifolia " The preceding treatise by Dr. En- gelmanu has shown their specific difference, but the circumstances whereby this knowledge was acquired are so interesting and instructive that we. who have almost providentially led thereto, deem it our duty to record them. In the winter of 1875 we received from France an order for several hundred thousand long cut- tings, mostly of the '■'■Taylor,^'' which variety had been recognized as the best grafting stock among those with which they had experimented. In view of the impossibility to furnish one hundred thousand or more Taylor cuttings (as this variety is, on account of its deficient productiveness, but little cultivated), our G. E. Meissner proposed to send them w^Hd lllparia or Cordifolia cuttings, which bear the greatest resemblauce to the Tai/lor, one of its cultivated varieties, and which we had every reason to believe would prove equally satis- factory, if not more so, as a Phylloxera-resisting grafting stock, for the reconstruction of their dev- astated vineyards. The success was beyond our most sanguine expectations, and since that time this species was more and more recognized as the great remedy for the Phylloxera-destroyed vine- yards of France. Very large quantities were then ordered from us, and we had to look about for tiiem far and near; nor was it an easy matter to avoid the ad- mixture of Cordifolia, Cinerea, ^'Estivalis, and other wild grapes, which would not answer. The careful, observing French vintners to whom these Riparias were so K'ery valuable for their vigorous rapid development in almost every soil, their great adaptability to rooting and grafting, and their perfect immunity from the Phylloxera, soon recognized that the so-called '^Riparia or Cordifolia"' embraced quite a group of somewhat Solonis also suffers greatly from the long drouthy summers of the Southwest, iu upland sandy soils, but iu bottom lands, or sub-irri- gated lands, where alone it occurs natively, it flourishes. It is used to a considerable ex- tent as a graft-stock in Europe. The writer of this has produced a number of hybrids of it with Rupestris, Lincecumii, Elvira, etc., in most of which flue wine properties prevail, it gives great sprightliness in combination with Vinifera and Labrusca-Vinifera combinations. V. DoANiAXA is extensively climbing, less branching, with larger, whitisli, downy, more lobed leaves, much larger clusters and berries than is Soloiris. It grows in the regions and localities of the Texas Panhandle country. For a wild grape the fruit is often really good, but the skin possesses some pungeuc}', similar to that in V. Candicans. This species is much more deeply penetrating in root and drouth-resisting on upland than either of the previously described. It is capable of making a very fine graft-stock, and is also one of the deviating forms, of larger and smaller foliage, more or less hairy, more or less dark in color of wood, etc. They found, besides, that some cut- tings (Cordifolia) would fail to root, though they arrived and were planted in the best condition. This, naturally, led to the study of their botanic character, now so fully established that we can at sight recognize and distinguish the true Riparia from Cordifolia: aye, in the mere cutting, iu winter, as well as iu the young plant and in the seed. To Prof. Millardet, of Bordeaux, belongs the honor to have established the character of certain distinction between Biparia and Cordifolia, whirh species Michaux had justly separated, but which most later botanists had confounded. (See Vigne Americaine, Oct., 1878.) Dr. Despetis, who made the Biparia a special study, says that he knows 380 varieties or sub- varieties of Riparia; some are tomentous (downy- leaved), others glabrous (smooth-leaved); some have light-red wood, others dark, and some even white (gray) wood. But they all resist everj'- where and succeed generally well on limestone hills. Manj' a grape-grower will ask : Of what prac- tical importance is it to know the botanic charac- teristics of any species':' The answer is, that it enables us to determine to which species a culti- vated variety belongs, and to know thereby, be- yond doubt, which (jualities, common to all de- scendants of such species, it will have; what kind, of >oil or location is most suitable; whether it will easil}'^ grow from cuttings, be more or less subject to certain diseases, be more or less hardy,^ etc. The Vitis Riparia comprise the most healthy and iiardy grapes of the North Central States (N. C. S.), formerly designated .as the Northwest, extending to the Rocky Mountains of Wyoming,. Colorado and New Mexico, and is found equally healthy and more productive at the south, in Ar- kansas and Texas. Hence we may also judge, from its geograplucal extension, as to its rare adaptability to various climates. Candicans. GRAPE MANUAL. Labrusca. 25 bCvSt bases for hybridization, as it readily en- dures all hardships of climate and resists the fungus parasites remarkably well. It grows readily from cuttings, resists Phylloxera per- fectly, is stocky, and thrives in nearly all soils and situations. So far no hybrids have been artihcially produced ; the writer now expects to experiment hybridization with some selected vines of Doaniana. V. Campini is native of the same regions with ]". Monticoki and T'. Berhoidferf, among the cretacious, dry, chalky limestone hills of central Southwest Texas, to the northwest- ward of Austin, the capital. It is a strong, branching species, with small leaves, very broad opening at base, dark green, thick and leathery, with little cottony down ; the clus- ter and berries are of about same size as in V. Doaniana, but have a distinct pure flavor, vinous, sprightly-, with some pungency in the thin, tough skin, possessing intense abundant coloring matter, fitting them well for making superior red wine. This species flowers and ripens early, but the fruit will hang on long after ripening, growing constantly better. Its cuttings grow with greatest ease. It is remarkably deep-rooting and drouth-resist- ing, a very promising base to hybridize upon. The writer has now fruiting numerous beau- tiful hybrids of it ; they have no musky (foxy) aroma or flavor, and, all in all, furnish good bases upon which to build for future viticul- ture, especially for the trying, changeable Southwest climate, where so much richness in color, flavor and sugar can be developed. As a graft-stock ChamjJini has few equals and no superior. In my experience it takes the graft readily and carries it robustly to a good age. V. Candicans, the Mustang grape of the black lands, is known to every Texan. The vine grows to enormous size, has a persistent fibrous bark; the leaves are of a somewhat triangular outline, on old vines numerously and deeply lobed, on young vines with broad open bases ; when 3'oung, both sides are white with a dense cottony wool ; at maturity the upper surface of leaves becomes very dark, smooth, shining green, and convex, the bor- ders being reflexed backward, the lower side permanently holds the dense, felty, white layer of wool (tomentum). The clusters are small, forked; the berries large, dull black; skin thick, tough, and of a fiery pungency, so that the chewing of a few skins makes the mouth sore. The berry is very persistent, the pulp tough, slippery, juicy and agreeably sweet, 3'et deficient in sugar. It would be supposed that such a grape would be of little value in viticulture, yet, in some of its hybrids with Vinifera, produced by that learned bot- anist and experimenter on grapes. Prof. A. MiUardet, of Bordeaux, France, and one b}^ the writer, named "Elvicand," in which "Elvira" is hybridized by Candicans pollen, we have grapes good in quality and remark- ably vigorous. But as cuttings of Candicans root with the greatest difficulty, it is not liked as a graft-stock. Considerable quantities of wine are made in Texas from fruit of this species, gathered from wild vines. V. Labri:sca. This species, represented pre-eminentlj^ by the Concord, its many seedlings, crosses and hybrids with Vinifera, is so well known that I need not dwell upon it. It is the great market grape east of the Rocky Mountains ; but the time is at hand when it will ''lift its hat" to others of our native species.* (Extract from the Third Edition.) *V. Labrusca, the species of which the largest number of our cultivated varieties and those most extensively cultivated in our country are the off- spring, is still the most limited local species, its home being confined to the region between the Atlantic Ocean and the Alleghany Mountains, the wild Labrusca being unknown in the Mississippi Valley. "Whatever has been called so there, or in Louisiana or Texas, is a large and downy - leaved form of ^Estivalis, always readily distin- guished by its " intermittent '' tendrils, while La- brusca has more or less ' contimious ' tendrils. •Tor table use, this species, in its improved va- rieties, will probably always occupy a prominent position in a lafge portion of the Eastern and Northern States. "As a wine grape the T". Labrusca has been over-estimated; the tough, musky pulp of even the best varieties requires a long and favorable season of growth to reduce the acid center so as to produce a proper ratio of the ingredients neces- sary for a passable quality of wine.'' — William Saunders. The large size of the fruit, the vigor and pro- ductiveness of the vine, and its easy propagation from cuttirgs, made the varieties of this species preferable to others for hybridizing with Euro- pean grapes; and it was expected to thereby ameliorate, if not to remove, their foxiness. While this improvement in Havor has been thus accom- plished, the process has diminished the hardiness and has increased the sensitiveness to climate and to fungoid diseases in the varieties thus produced. It has proven far more successful to grow seedlings from pure Labrusca varieties (though of the hundreds laised from pure Con- cord seed not one has so far been produced sur- passing it), or seedlings from crosses between the coarser and more tender varieties of this species,, as the Niagara (cross between Concord and Cas- sady), the Jefferson and the Diamond (crosses be- tween Concord and lona). Moreover, the much decried 'foxy taste*' becomes much less objec- tionable by habit. The hardy varieties of the Labrusca are also ex- cellent grafting stock for tender, le?s vigorous varieties, especially for hybrids of the V. Vinifera, being quite resisting to the Phylloxera; but in some localities the Labrusca does not feel at home. 26 Lincecumii. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Post- Oak. Fig. 43. VITIS LINCECUMII, Post-Oak Grape, Mimson. (Jigger's No. 43.) Bourquiniana. GRAPE MANUAL. Lincecumii. 27 V. Bourquiniana, best known and repre- sented in the Herhemont and Jaquez. They are considered a form of onr native ^stioalis, styled "vSoutliern JEstivalis," but have been traced to southern France. They are fully at home in the south, and resist Phylloxera as well as most our native species, their fruit, though small in berry, is of the highest quality; but is very deficient in imparting its fine qualit^y to hj-brids. The Herbemont, known as "Brown French," and Jaquez (Le Noir), known as *'Blue French" were brought to Savannah, Ga. (as I am credibly informed), by a Hugue- not fd,raily by the name of Bourquin, from southern France, over 150 j^ears ago. The vines, sent me by Mr. Gougie Bourquin of Sa- vannah, under these names, .are direct de- scendants from the original vines in the Bour- quin gardens and prove be^^ond question, in sev- eral years fruiting on my grounds, that they are identical with Herbemont and Jacquez. In this blood we have vigor combined with refining power, and it must be even moie valuable in hybridization with our natives than the vinif era, especially for the south ; for it is a very late ripening species, so that far north they would hardly ripen, but all the more valuable south on account of their late- ness. (In the descriptive part of this cata- logue the editors continue, however, to classify these varieties as southern ^stivalis). V. Lincecumii, the Post-oak grape (with portrait from nature ^ reduced) of the south- west, known also as Turkey grape, and as large-fruited ^stivalis. Hermann Jaeger first brought this species to prominent notice in his "Far West," "Neosho" q. v. No. 13, No. 43, «&c., (listed in third edition of this Catalogue, 1883, p. 112) ; choice finds in the woods of that region. In Texas the fruit of this species grows larger still, often as large as Concords ; and from the best finds among tens of thousands of vines diverse hybrids have been produced by tlie writer with the result that among them the finest quality, neitber in this country nor in France ; it does not thrive well and its fruit is very inclined to rot. G. Onderdonk writes us : "After all, our grapes in Texas must come from the ^Estivalis family; no Labrusca has given us good, permanent satis- faction here." This same view obtained ground in Arkansas and Southwest Missouri, a'ter full trial and dearly bought experience. Herman Jaeger, of Neosho, Southwest Missouri, wrote us: "In Southwest Missouri, Southern Illinois, Ar- kansas, Western Texas (also in Alabama), the La- brusca. or Fox grapes, bring two healthy crops of fine grapes, and the most vigorous varieties a few more ; then they rot to such an extent that they are entirely worthless. The uEstivalis never rots and is the only truly reliable grape for these States." greatest vigor and prodHctiveness have been secured ; table and wine grapes with large clusters, large berries, persistence and good quality, which promise to succeed .over a large area. The Post-oak grape has gener- ally larger berries than the eastern ^stivalis, and these berries are i)ossessed of a peculiar, pronounced fruity flavor, sometimes too strong to be agreeable, known here as Post- oak grape-flavor. This species endures the longest, severest drouths, on our native light sandy uplands with impunity, which few other species can accomplish ; and where V. La- brusca, V. Rupestris, V. Riparia and V. Solonis would burn out entirely, the Post-oak would hang full of leaves, yet pliable and lively green, scaix-el}- wilted, b^' having deep- ly penetrative, large, firm, branched roots and leaves of firm texture, evaporating little moisture from their surface. The fruit of the best of this species has richness in flavor, sprightliness and sweetness ; good size of cluster and berry, persistence to pedicel and keeping qualities which, taken in connection with its characteristics for wine-production, nnake it probably the most valuable basis for improvement of all our species. I do not consider our best Lincecumii or Post-oak grapes quite good enough for table, but think that in the hands of experimenter and hybrid- izers, they furnish a most valuable basis for improvement. * The ditficulty with which the cuttings of Post-oak grow, renders its propagation in pure form tedious and slow ; but its hybrids with Rupestris, as in Jaeger's No. 70 (now named Munson), and No. 72, and in "America," also in hybrids with LabruscaX Vinifera hj^brids, grow generall}- well from its cuttings. V. ^sTivALis ; Summer Grape. In this species we have grapes of high astringent wine properties, generally free from the mil- dews and rots, as so well illustrated in the Norton, It is unnecessar}' to give a more detailed description of this species here, as *Our friend Munson is now widely known as a successful hj'bridizer, a creator of new varieties; but little known, however, is the immense activity and loving devotion, the sacrifice of tin)e and money, which this involves. He plants and tests, every year, many thousands of his seedlings, selecting the finest only from them; ever trying new combinations. The varieties listed in this catalogue are the cream from over 40,000 grown ; and he says: '"If as many as a dozen are perma- nently retained I shall feel that my work has not been in vain. This may not be encouraging to originators — but it is the road to progress; and by doing this work for years, he knows now bet- ter than ever which are congenial combinations and the best .xpecific bases upon which to build. 28 JEstivalis. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Fig. 44. VITIS AESTIVALIS. (Summer Grape,) Michaux. nearly everyone who knows anything of grapes knows the native summer grape.* * V. jEstivai^is. {See Dr. Engelniann's Classification, page 15 in this edition). While we no-longer retain with V. JEstivalis the form distinguished by Buckley, and after him by Munson, as V. Lincecumii, we still consider the varieties of the Herbemont and Lenoir class as be- ing comprised in oui' ^Estivalis species, its southern group, until the wild plant from which these varieties might have sprung will be definitely known. The follow- ing Viticultural remarks from our third edition of this catalogue apply to both its northei-n and southern group: ViTis ^T^STIVAMS. — This species is preeminent- ly the WINK ^rape of the South Athintic States, and of the lower Mississippi Valley and Texas. . . . The berries are destitute of pulp, and the juice contains a larger percentage of sugar than any other improved American species. The foli- age is not so liable to disease as that of the fox grape, and in the berries rot is also less prevail- ing, while in some varieties of this class, as Nor- ton's Virginia and Cynthiana, it is comparatively unknown. Some of the best wines made in thia country are produced from varieties of thi& Berlandieri. GRAPE MANUAL. Rotundifolia. 29 family. '•! am couvineed that neither the wine- producing capabilities of tlie country nor the highest excellence of tiie product can be decided until vineyards of these varieties are established in the best locations of favorable climates." — William Saunders . "The most genial home of this species is the ■country of the Ozark hills, Missouri, S. Kansas, Arkansas, Texas and Indian TeiTitory ; probably also the mountain slopes in Virginia, North Caro- lina and I'ennessee. And these must be looked upon as the great producing regions of this con- tinent, east of the Rocky Mountains, for a certain class of fine vnnes. The varieties of this group generally prefer a dr}', poor soil, intermingled with lime and de- composed stones, with a southern and southeast- ern exposure; they seem to endure the severest drouths without flagging. Although we have seen some of them, especially the Norton and ■Cynthiana, bear immense crops on the deep, rich, sandy loam of our river bottom, their fruit does not reach the same perfection as on the hills. The icood of the true ^-Estivalis is very solid, hard, with small pith, and firm outer bark; so that it is almost impossible to propagate this species from cuttings. The bark on the one-year-old wood is of a dark gray color, bluish around the eyes. The roots are wiry and tough, with a smooth, hard liber, penetrating deep into the ground, success- fully defying the attacks of Phylloxera. Their resistive power has been fully tested, and estab- lished beyond a doubt. As a stock for grafting they are far superior to Clinton — but we think they are too good and valuable to serve merely as 3. grafting stock. V. Berlandieri ; (figured in a photo- engraving, from nature, reduced ^). This species, owing to its thriving in the dry, limy and chalky soils, where most other species fail, and being fully resistant to Phylloxera, very strong and long lived — makes the most successful graft-stock in such soils, it has proven by actual test to resist chlorosis (yellowing of foliage caused by ex- cess of lime in soil) in the Department of the Herault, France, where the soils are very dry and chalky. The vine is closely allied to V. Cinerea, but the leaves have a brighter green and a shining surface, especially below, be- tween the veins. The cluster is large to very large, compact, having small berries of sprightly, sweet, vinous quality, and may, with judicious hybridization, produce valu- able varieties for wine. V. Rotundifolia, V. Vulpiua, or Southern Fox grape of Linnteus, the Muscadine grape of the Southern States, represented in cultiva- tion by the Scuppernong (^the only variety not black in color, wiiich is of a dull greenish amber) Flowers, James, J//s/i, Pee Dee. Thomas, (see their description) ; it is a sure bearer, provided male, or staminate vines stand in the vicinity of the fertile vines. It is leafing out and flowering late and. as far as known, all fertile vines of the species have practically pistilate flowers, the sameus l)eing so weak and reflexed that their pollen is im- potent to fertilize the ovules, as is generall}- the case in varieties of other species having reflexed stamens. The vines of Rotundifolia are uniformly very healthy, resistant to nearly all fungus diseases and the roots to Phjdlox- era. Those who are accustomed to eating the fruit of this kind relish it. The idea occurred to the writer that if the finer, large-bunched Herbemont could be successfully hybridized with the best Musca- dine-varieties, a combination might be secured which would furnish a unique and desirable family of gra])es for the south. Acting upon this idea he is now raising several dozen hy- brids of Snipper nong and Toma^ (f) with Herbemont (m). (We confidently hope that friend Munson will be successful, and wish that he may ob- tain for it such price as his great fellow hybridizer, Luther Burbank, gets for some of his wonderful "new creations.") LOCATION. The onl}^ general rules we can give to guide in the selection of a proper, desirable location for vineyards, are: 1. A good wine-growing region is one where the season of growtli is of suflflcient length to ripen to perfection our best wine grapes, ex- empt from late spring frosts, heavy summer dews, and early frosts in autumn. Do not at- tempt, therefore, to cultivate the grape in low, damp valleys, along creeks ; high table- lands and hillsides, with their dry atmosphere and cool breezes, are preferable to rich bot- tom lands ; low situations, where water can collect and stagnate about the roots, will not answer ; wherever we find the ague an habit- ual guest with the inhabitants, we need not look for healthy grape-vines ; but on the hill- sides, gentle slopes, along large rivers and lakes, on the bluffs overhanging the banks of our large streams, where the fogs arising from the water give sufficient humidity to the atmosphere, even in the hottest summer days, to refresh the leaf during the night and morn- ing hours, there is the location for the culture of the grape. Shelter has also an important bearing on the healthy growth of the vines ; some well-located vineyards have not proven lucrative for the want of proper shelter ; where it is not afforded by woods growing near by, it should be provided for by planting trees; large trees, however, should not be planted so near tlie vines as to interfere with their roots. One of our vineyards has been thus protected by an arbor vitie fence from the north and west winds. This fence is now 30 years old, over 8 feet high, and is consid- ered one of the finest ornaments to our 30 Berlandieri BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. or Monticola. Fiff. 45. VITIS BERLANDIERI, Planchon. (VITIS MONTICOLA, Engelmann.) Preparing the Soil. GRAPE MANUAL. Planting. 31 grounds. There are some locations so fav- ored that no artificial protection is needed. Remember, however, that no one locality is suited to all kinds of grapes. (See page 3.) 2. A good soil for the vineyard should be a dry, calcareous loam, sufficiently deep (say 3 feet), loose and friable, draining itself readily. A sandy, yet moderately rich soil is better adapted to most varieties than heavy clay. New soils, both granitic and lime- stone, made up by nature of decomposed stone and leaf-mould, are to be preferred to those that have long been in cultivation, un- less these have been put in clover and rested a few years. If you have such a location and soil, seek no further, ask no chemist to analyze its ingredients, but go at once to PREPARING THE SOIL. " The preparation of the soil is undoubt- edly one of the most important operations in the establishment of a vineyard, and one of its objects should be to get the soil of a uniform texture and richness throughout, but not over-rich. This deep stirring of the soil puts it very much in the condition of a sponge, which enables it to draw moisture from the soil beneath and from the atmos- phere above, and hold it for the wants of the plant ; hence, soils that are drained and deeply stirred, keeping the good soil on the surface, are less subject to the evils that accompany and follow a drought than those that are not so treated. It is of the first importance, therefore, that vineyards and or- chards at least should be put in the best con- dition for the reception of the vines and trees, if the best results are aimed at." — Pet. Henderson. The old system of trenching is no more practiced, except, upon very hard, stony soil, and upon steep hillsides, being too costly and of very little, if of any, advan- tage. The plow has taken the place of the spade, and has greatly lessened the expense. While we would urge a thorough work in the preparation of the soil before planting the vine, we believe that by careful grubbing (in timber lands), leaving no stumps, which would only be continual eyesores and hind- rances to proper cultivation, and then, using a large breaking plow, followed b}^ the sub- soil plow, the soil will be stirred as deeply as is really necessary to insure a good and and healthy growth of vines. For old ground a common two-horse plow, with a span of strong horses or cattle, followed in the same furrow by a subsoil stirrer, will be sufficient to stir the soil deepl}^ and thoroughly, and will leave it as mellow and as nearly in its natural position as desirable. This may be done during any time of the year when the ground is open and not too wet. Most soils would be benefited by under-draining; the manner of doing this is the same as for other farm crops, except that for vines the drains should be placed deeper ; it is less important on our hillsides, and too costly to be here practiced to a great extent ; wet spots, how- ever, must be drained at least by gutters, and, to prevent the ground from washing, small ditches should be made, leading into a main ditch. Steep hillsides, if used at all, should be terraced. PLANTING. The soil being thus thoroughly prepared and in good friable condition, you are ready for planting. The proper season for doing this here, is in the fall, after the 1st of November, or in the spring, before the 1st of May. Seasons differ and sometimes make later planting advisable, but never during frost nor while the ground is too wet. If you have been delayed with your work of preparing the soil in spring, the 3'oung plants from the nursery should be heled in some cool, dry place and covered, so that their vegetation be retarded ; if they have already made shoots, be specially careful to guard against their roots getting dry. Most vine- yards are planted in spring ; in northern and very cold localities, this may be preferable. We prefer fall planting ; the ground will gen- erally be in better condition, as we have better weather in the fall, and more time tO' spare. The ground can settle among the roots in winter ; the roots will have healed and calloused over, new rootlets will issue early in spring before the condition of the ground would have permitted planting, and. the young plants, commencing to grow as soon as the frost is out of I he ground, will start with full vigor in spring. To prevent the roots from being thrown to the surface by alternate freezing and thawing, a mound of earth hoed up around the plants, or a ridge thrown up with a plow so as to elevate the ground somewhat in the rows, will be found to afford all the protection necessary.. By no means delay planting till late in spring,, and, if your ground is not ready in time, you had much better cultivate it with corn or hoed crops of some kind, and postpone planting- until next fall. Planting in rows, eight feet apart, is now the usual method ; it gives sufficient space for a horse and man to pass through with plow or cultivator ; the distance in the rows varies somewhat with the growth of the different varieties and the richness of the soil. Most of our strong vigorous, grow- ers, will need 8 to 10 feet in the rows ; while 32 BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. the Delaware, and other light grapes may have sufficient room when planted 6 feet apart. The dwarfing treatment practiced with European varieties, especially by Ger- man vintners, will not do for American vines, which must have ample room to spread and a free circulation of air. The number of vines required to set an acre (containing 43,560 -square feet) will be — . Distance, feet. Metres. Number. C ft. by 6 ft 1 "^ 85 by 1 '" 85 1,210 € ft. by 7 ft I " 85 by 2 "> 15 1 ,037 6 ft. by 8 ft. I ™ 85 by 2 "' 46 907 6 ft. l)y 9 ft 1 ■" 85 by 2 "' 75 807 6 ft. by 10 ft I '" 85 by 3 " 725 7 ft. by 7 ft 2 '" 18 by 2 °^ 15 889 7 ft. by 8 ft 2 •" 15 by 2 "> 46 777 7 ft. by 9 ft 2 "' 15 by 2 " 75 690 7 ft. by 10 ft 2 '" 15 by 3 ™ ... 622 S ft. by 8 ft 2 '" 46 by 2 " 46 680 S ft. by 9 ft 2 '" 46 by 2 '" 75 605 8 ft. by 10 ft 2 •" 46 by 3 •" 545 9 ft. by 9 ft 2 ■" 75 by 2 ■" 75 537 9 ft. by 10 ft 2 ■" 75 by 3 •" 484 10 ft. by 10 ft 3 "' by 3 "^ 435 One acre = 41 ares French measure, or one hectare jiearly equal to two and a half acres. Having determined the distance at which you desire to plant the vines, mark off the rows, running them parallel, and with the most level lines of your slope or hillside, so tliat 3'ou may easily plow between the rows and that the ground may not wash. (On an eastern slope the rows will therefore run in a 'direction from north to south, which most vine-dressers prefer.) Be careful, on sloping ground, to leave spaces for surface drains ; the steeper the hillsides the more frequent must these surface drains be. Then divide the rows into the desired distances by the aid of a stretched line, and put small stakes where each plant is to stand. Now, if the ground is sufficiently dry so as to pulverize easily, make the holes to receive the vines. The depth of these holes must necessarily vary somewhat with tiie nature of the soil. On very steep hillsides, and especially on southern slopes, with naturally warm, dry soil, you must plant deeper than on gentle slopes with deep, rich soil, or on bottom land and rich prairies. Eight inches will be deep enough on the latter ; on the former we should plant from twelve to fourteen inches deep. Having made the holes — and it is best not to make too many at a time, as the ground will dry out too quickly — you can go to planting. In planting it is important to spread the roots carefully, and to have them each and all firmly surrounded with good fine soil, pressing it down with the hands or foot; then fill up the hole with earth, forming a very _ small mound, leaving one or two eyes exposed. Every beginner in Grape culture knows that young rooted vines are used for i)lant- ing, whether it be for whole vinevards or merely for tlie garden or arbor, and that such young vines are usually raised in the nursery' from cuttings or laj^ers. But the reason why they are not grown from seeds is not generally so well known, and even among old experienced grape-growers some errone- ous ideas prevail with regard to seed culture and questions connected with this, now more than ever important and interesting subject. It is scarcely necessaiy to mention that the wild grape grows and propagates itself from seed only. This wild grape generally re- produces itself; i. e., its seedlings do not materially differ from their parent vines. Transplanted into richer soil, and receiving care and cultivation, its berries ma}^ increase in size, and in the course of years may some- what improve and change its character ; if, then, we take the seed of this cultivated vine, especially if it was grown in proximity to other different grapes, the seedlings of these will more materially differ. So great is this tendency to variation, that of a hundred seedlings of one cultivated vine scarcely two will be found exactly alike ; some will differ widely ; nearly one-half will be male plants and will not produce any fruit at all, while most of the others will retrograde to their wild origin, and scarcely one, perhaps, be an improvement on the cultivated i)arent. The layer or the cutting of a grape-vine will, on the contrary, exactly reproduce the parent vine from which it was taken, and even any transplanting of the same, into a widely different locality, cannot change it. The differences in soil and climate may im- prove or impjair the vigor of the vine and its foliage, the size and quality of its fruit ; in other words, they maj' be more or less favor- able to the development of its inherent qualities, to the good or ill success of the variety ; but they will never materially change it in appearance, form, taste, color — much less in its botanical characteristics.* The * Tlie erroneous opinion that a grape transplanted to other countries may become entirely changed by influences of climate and soil was often supported by errors or deceptions in transplanting a vine or cut- ting, not true to name. Thus the famous Tokay grape was suppo.sed to liave been transplanted to the Rhine 150 years ago, and, as it was there found to be a miser- able grape, uuite different from the noble Tokay, this was ascribed to the influence of the different soil. But lately it has been di-scovered that tlie grape trans- l)lanted from Tokay (in Hungary), and known in (jreruiany under the nickname " Putsschcre" (Snuffers), is the same grape which also grows at Tokay and is known there under the name " Gyonyssdlo" (white pearl), and that it is there also of poor quality, and is not the e.\cellent variety " Frumint" of which the celebrated Tokay wine is made. Planting. GRAPE MANUAL. Seed Culture. 33 practical grape-grower, tlierefore, who desires to plant certain varieties, all fruit-bearing, will not plant seeds, nor young plants raised from seeds — although some theorists pretend that the long continued propagation and culture of the grape from the wood was the cause of its recent failures to withstand diseases, insects, and other parasites. Care- ful and unprejudiced investigation and rea- soning as well as practical experiments have fully established the facts : that seedlings resist no more successfully than plants from cuttings, nor are the}' much less sensitive to the vicissitudes of climate ; and that the long continued culture and propagation from wood has nothing to do with the greater or less resistance to disease, nor has their cellular tissue been softened thereby. For practical grape culture we should use none but the best rooted plants of those kinds which we wish to produce. Some vintners, from supposed economy, use only ■cuttings to plant their vineyards, placing two cuttings where one vine is to grow ; but the result generally is unsatisfactory, especially witb American varieties, most of which do not root as easily as those of the European Vinifera class, and make much replanting necessary ; and where both cuttings do grow, one must be pulled out. Those vintners would do better, by far, by first growing their cuttings one or two years in nurser}?^ rows, and afterwards transplanting the best of them to their intended vineyard. But if we desire to obtain new varieties we must plant seed. This is a far more uncertain, slow and difficult operation than most people imagine, and but very few have been success- ful in it. Just as some careful breeders of animals have succeeded in raising improved kinds, on which they engrafted certain qualities by crossing, so have horticulturists endeavored to reach the same end by hybrid- izing the best varieties of grapes and planting their seeds, having due regard to the charac- teristics of the parents from which they breed. But of late still another very important function has been assigned to seed planting, namely, to produce in Europe (especially where the importation of our cuttings and rooted plants has been prohibited) American vines, which resist the Phylloxera, as graft- ing stocks. For, however great the tendency to variation is in seedlings, still, under all circumstances and changes of soil and climate, they retain the Phjdloxera-resisting root as well as other botanical characteristics of their parents.* During the last years we have * For this purpose it is best to use the seed of the wild grape, especially of ^Estivalis and of Riparia; the seed of hybrids should not be used. furnished several thousands of pounds of grape-seed to Austria, Italy, Spain, and Portugal. The reports of their germination were generally favorable. The following report of v. Babo, kindly furnished us in spring 1883 is certainly both reliable and interesting in this respect: "Of the grape- seeds received from you last 3^ear, the Riparia sprouted best; so well, indeed, that we can scarcely manage the innumerable small seed- lings. All the other seedlings (from culti- vated sorts) show great variety in fruit, color, foliage, &c. Most variable are those from Taylor seed; from tlie 2,500 bearing vines raised from seed of this one variety, a hun- dred distinct sorts can easily be selected. The young plants from Riparia seed seem not to vary much, as we can find but very little essential difference in their foliage." We do not intend here to discuss the vari- ous modes of multiplication or propagation of grape-vines from cuttings, layers or single eyes (buds), still less the methods of produc- ing new varieties from seed and of hybridiz- ing, as this would far exceed the scope of this brief manual, nor do we desire to say whether plants grown from cuttings, from single eyes or from laj^ers, are preferable. Propagators and nurserymen are not con- sidered disinterested, impartial judges on this question. But we may say without fear of contradiction that for success in grape growing it is of first importance to get the best plants. Vines raised from layers were in former years held to be superior, and are still preferred by many, but unprejudiced and observing cultivators have found that they only look stronger and finer, but are not as good as plants properly grown from cut- tings or single-eyes, of mature, health}^ wood. Our German and French vine-dressers generally practiced growing vines from lo)ifj cuttings, but short (two or three eye) cut- tings will usually make stronger and better ripened roots. Others again haA^e obtained the best results from single-eye plants, and consequently prefer them. The celebrated French ampelograph Dr. Jules Guyot praised single-eye cuttings as physically and phj'sio- logically most approaching to those raised from seed. We have tried all, and find that it makes very little difference how the vine has been produced and raised, provided it has strong, firm, health}^, well-ripened roots, and wood, with plump and perfect buds. As a general rule, a well yroicn vine is in its best condition for pla ting when 07ie year old. Fuller and many other good authorities prefer two-year old transplanted vines ; vines older than two years should not be planted, and 34 Planting. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Grafting. so-called extra large layers "for iinmediate bearing" are a humbug. There is. however, one method of propagat- ing the grape, namely, by Grafts, which belongs more properly to the sphere of the cultivator, the vine3'ardist, than the nursery- man or propagator, and which presents itself under aspects almost entirely new. GRAFTING. Grafting the grape-vine is now practiced on a gigantic scale in Europe, where the con- tinued inroads of the Phylloxera have carried devastation and destruction over an immense area of vineyards, once thrifty and blooming. Many methods have been tried ; untold sums of money have been expended in vain attempts to check the march of this terrible enemy of the European grape ; but, alas ! these at- tempts have practically proved to be failures. By the application and continued use of chemical insecticides some vineyards have been kept up in a state of comparative health and productiveness ; but, unfortunately, the cost of these annual applications is to high for general use, and can only be afforded by the proprietors of the most renowned vine- yards, the "grand cms," whose products command such extraordinary prices as to cover the extraordinary expenses of preserv- ing them by this means. Vineyards which can be entirely submerged in water every winter, for a period of at least fifty da3's, can also be maintained in spite of the Phylloxera. And, finally, vines planted in soil containing at least 60 per cent, of pure sand (silica) offer also a comparative resistance to the insect. These three means of maintaining the Eu- ropean grape in spite of the Phylloxera apply themselves only in such exceptional cases, however, that European grape culture would be doomed to an almost entire destruction were it not for the American vine coming to the aid of its European sister. The Ameri- can vine, with its strong, robust system, and its tough, vigorous root, resists the Phyl- loxera, and by lending its root to the Eu- ropean vine makes the reconstruction of the devastated vineyards possible. When the second edition of our catalogue was published (1875) this maUer was still a problem, and many then doubted whether the solution, positivel^^ and practicall3^ would be a satisfactory one. This problem has been solved, and it is placed beyond all doubt that the use of the American resistant vine as a grafting stock for the European grape (V. Vinifera) is the true solution of the Phyl- loxera question for the European vintner — that solution which alone has been found generally applicable, generallj- practical, and generally satisfactory. Millions of vines are now grafted in Europe every spring, some on simple cuttings, some on nursery plants, and others in vinej^ard plantations ; but in all cases the grafting stock is of American descent. The stocks most generally employed for this pur- pose are types of our wild Vitis Miparia, which probabl}" constitutes four-fifths of the grafting stocks emploj'ed, having been found to adapt themselves to nearlj^ all kinds of soils and exposures, and uniting the greatest powers of resistance to the insect with a remarkable facilit}^ of rooting from cuttings and of receiving the graft of the V. Vinifera. We will be pardoned for mentioning here with a certain degree of pride and satisfac- tion, that we were ihejirst to recommend and to bring this valuable grafting stock to the notice of the French grape-growers (in Dec, 1875) and to place it in their hands in suf- ficient quantities to test its merits, which merits they soon learned to appreciate. Since then the French vintners have propagated and increased the stock in a wonderful degree, the single Department of Herault alone furnished many millions of plants and i cuttings of Riparia, all to be grafted with » the European grape. The results obtained by grafting the T'. Vinifera on American roots have generall}'- been found so satisfactory, not only as the means of resisting the Phylloxera, but also as imparting greater vigor and productiveness to the European grape, that the practice of grafting on American stocks would probably be continued even if the dreaded Phylloxera were to suddenly and entirely disappear. Unfortunately, the very reverse, the increase and spread of the insect, is far more probable ; and the sooner those grape-growers of south- ern Europe whose territor}^ is not 3'et infested by this scourge reconcile themselves to the idea of reconstructing their precious but doomed vine^'ards hy the means of grafting on American Phylloxera-resisting stocks, the better it will be for them. Since the foregoing, from our last edition was written, more than ten j^ears have elapsed and the experience of the ju'esent day finds the expectations then expressed fully veri- fied. Thousands, yes, hundred thousands of acres of Phjdloxera destroyed vine^'ards have been reconstituted by grafting on American roots, and are to-day a^ain in full vigor and productiveness. The great grape industry of southern Europe which twenty years ago was threatened almost to destruc- tion has not only recovered, but is again, as of yore, a most important factor in the Grafting. GRAPE MANUAL. Grafting. 35 national wealth and prosperity of that part of the world. We hope our American readers will excuse these rather lengthy remarks about "grafting in Europe;" but some of them, especially our friends in California, where the European grape forms the main basis of grape culture, will lind them of some practical interest. The question of grafting the grape-vine has mau}'^ other points of interest for us, aside from the object of placing a variety which is subject to the Ph3'lloxera beyond the per- nicious influence of this insect. Thus an- other object for which grafting is very desir- able is the early testing of new varieties. By grafting on a vigorously bearing vine we will generally obtain bearing wood, and some- times even fruit, the first season. We are also enabled, by grafting, to turn old vigor- ous vines of perhaps some worthless variety to good account, as with a little trouble and care and the loss of only one year we can change them into some choice and valuable variety. Before we enter into the details of the 'modus operandi of grafting, we will first speak of the conditions generally considered essential to the successful performance of tbe operation. First. The Stock. Judging from our own experience, we cannot side with those who claim that in all cases the stock and scion should belong to the same class in order to insure perfect success. A point which is of far more importance is the perfect health and vigor of the stock. We should never select a sickly or diseased vine, nor one subject to the attacks of the Phylloxera, as a stock to graft upon. Even if the graft should live it will thrive but poorly, unless indeed it belongs to some very vigor- ous variety and is grafted deeply enough below the surface to form its own roots ; these will then support it entirely, and it will soon dissolve its union with the unhealthy stock. But even in this case it will require years to overcome the effects of the uncon- genial partnership. If the object in grafting is to guard a variety subject to the Phyll- oxera against the ravages of this insect, we should select for the stock a vine of a strong and vigorous variety, which possesses recog- nized powers of resistance to the insect. The graft should then be inserted as near the sur- face of the ground as possible, and, where practical)le, even above it. Some have as- serted that the stock and scion should be of varieties as near alike in vigor of growth as possible, but with this we cannot agree. We should invariably prefer to graft a weak grower on a strong one. Second. The Scion. This should come from a healthy and short-jointed cane of last summer's growth and of moderate size, (a little stouter than an ordinary lead pencil is the thickness that we prefer). It should be cut from the vine before very hard-freezing weather and kept in a cool cellar, either in damp moss, sand or sawdust, or buried in the ground. In case the grafting is to be performed late in spring, the scion may be kept dormant in an ice house. In his anotatioiis to the French translator of our last edition, Mr. Champiu remarks: "Grafts and cuttings maybe preserved in- definite^ provided they are protected entirely from air, heat, and especially from humidity. The ej^es or buds are quite similar to grains of seed ; so long as heat or moisture have not caused them to sprout, they preserve their faculties of vegetation." "By placing or stratifying the grape canes in dry, fine sand, and in a cold dry place, they will keep as fresh as on the day they were cut, not only for a sea- son, but from one season to the next. I have grafted on the 2oth of Ma}-, 1884, scions which were cut and stratified since the month of December, 1882, and a large number have taken and grown perfectly." Third. When to Graft. The best time, as far as days and months are concerned, varies, of course, with the locality and lati- tude ; but, as a rule, we would state that the vine cannot be grafted with good success, either while the sap is running so freely as to cause the vine when cut to bleed heavil}-, as it is termed,* nor 3'et (except by the process of inarching, of which hereafter) from tlie time in tlie spring, or rather in the early summer, when the young shoots begin to turn hard and fibrous ; this period generally commences about the time of the bloom and lasts until after the fall of the leaf. This reduces the time for successful grafting to two periods, the first one 13'ing between the fall of the leaf and the rising of active circu- lation in the spring, and the second one com- mencing after this exceedingly strong How of sap has abated and lasting until the full de- velopment of the first young growth. In the more southern States grafting may be successfullj^ and practically performed during the first period. In fact, the late Dr. A. P. Wylie of Chester, S. C, considered the fall or early winter in that latitude as the *Mr. Champin says: "Even at the period when the vine bleeds most profusely under the cut of the knife, and when the flow of the liciuid would thi-eaten to drown or carry off the scion, one can sraft with every chance of success under the following precaution: Cut off the vine to he grafted on a little above the point where the grape is to be inserted and wait until the fountain has ceased running; this flow of sap will cease in a few days, — sometimes it will take several days. When it has stopped freshen the cut a little below the previous one, and one can fit the scion with all confidence of success to the Steele thus prepared. 36 Grafting. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE, Grafting. X>roper time for grafting. Farther north, and even in the latitude of St. Louis, fall grafting is not quite as certain, for even when pro- tected b}"^ a mulch of straw or leaves the graft is in danger of being thrown out by the heaving of the ground caused by the frost. In this latitude, however, we often have fine days in February and early in March, when the ground is open and before the active flow of sap has commenced, which should be im- proved for the operation. Still farther north, where the ground opens late and spring comes in abruptly, these days are generally so few that they can seldom be utilized. For these northern latitudes the best oppor- tunity lies in the second period, or during the time in which the sap has ceased its active flow and exudes from the wound in a gumra}' state. Some even claim good suc- cess in mid-summer with scions of the same season's growth. In describing the operation proper, of grafting in the several different methods, we do not think that we could give better direc- tions than by following largely an excellent French work, '■'■Traite tlieonqiie et pratique (111 Grefage de la Vigne," by Aime Champix, an eminent and most intelligent practical vineyardist, and a most spirited and elegant writer, who has treated the subject in an exhaustive work. His book has also been translated into the German language by Dr. RoESLER. ("Der Weinbau, seine Cultur und Veredlung, von Aime Champin. A. Bartleben & Co.: Wien, 1882.") To Mr. Champin we are also indebted for the cuts relating: to grafting. The method of giafting most generally ap- plied for larger stocks, or for plants which are already established in the open ground, is "cleft grafting." After clearing away the soil around the collar of the stock to be operated upon, to the depth of 3 or 4 inches, select a place below the surface with a smooth exterior around the collar ; just above this place cut the vine off horizontally with a flne-toothed saw, or, in the case of smaller stocks, Avith a sharp knife ; then split the stock with a common grafting chisel, or other sharp instrument, so that the cleft will run down about li or 2 inches. Insert the small end of the grafting chisel (C), or a narrow wedge, in the centre of the cleft in order to keep it open, and then with a very sharp knife cut j^our scion — which may be 3 to 4 inches long and have one or two ej^es — to a long wedge-shape at the lower end, so as to fit the cleft, leaving the outer side a trifle thicker than the inner one ; insert it in the cleft so that the inner bark of both stock and scion may as much as possible make a close fit on each other ; then withdraw the ; wedge in the center, and the scion will be held firmly in its place b}^ the pressure of the stock. If the stock is a large one two scions may be inserted, one on each side. This mode of grafting answers for stocks varying from one-half to three inches in diameter. (See Figs. 46 and 47.) Though not absolutely necessary with larg€ stocks, it is best to wind the grafted plani tightly with some strong coarse string, oi other suitable material, in order to bind stool and graft together. Then cover it with grafting-clay ; this clay is best made bj thoroughly' mixing one part fresh cowdun| with four parts of ordinary tenacious clay, Fig. 4 Gmfting. GRAPE MANUAL. Grafting. 37 Grafting-wax, such as is generally used for tree and other grafting, cannot be recom- mended for the grape, as the tallow and rosin seem to have a deleterious influence. To complete the operation, replace the soil, filling it up so that the upper bud on the scion will be level with the surface. A shade placed so as to protect it from the noondaj^ sun, or a slight mulch, is very desirable. This method of grafting may also be em- plo3^ed for small stocks ; when the stock is nearly the same size as the scion a perfect contact of the bark (liber) can be obtained on both sides. (See Fig. 48.) Or two scions may also be inserted in a stock of a little larger size (see Fig. 49). It can also be employed for grafting cut- ting on cuttings (as figured in Fig. 50), though for this, and in fact for all small stocks grafted out of the ground, we would prefer the WHIP-GRAFT, or, better yet, the "Cham- piN-GRAKT," of which wc will speak later. Fisr. 48. Fig. 49. Fig. 50. Another mode of cleft-grafting, which though a little more tedious, is perhaps also that much more certain, is to saio a slit in the stock a])out one and a half inches deep with a thick-bladed or wide-set saw, instead of using the chisel. The cleft thus made must be spread open just sufficiently to receive the scion, which must be cut to fit nicely in the slit, with its upper portion resting, with a square shoulder each side, on the stock. In this instance we prefer to graft with two buds, the lower one of which should be the point where to cut the shoulders. In other respects the same rules appl}^ to this mode as those given before. The greatest advantage is that we can always make a clean, straight cleft, even when the stock is gnarly or twisted. As the slit cut by the saw is always of a uniform thickness, the scions may be prepared beforehand in the house during a rainy day or in the evening, and kept in damp moss until wanted. When grafting European grapes (Vinifera) on American stock, to protect them from the Phylloxera, it is important and essential to guard against the graft of the Vinifera making its own roots and finally severing its connec- tion with the resistant stock, — a danger which must be guarded against. To obviate this the European graft should be placed as near the level of the soil as possible, preferably rather a little above than below. If placed above the level of the ground it will be neces- sar3% however, for the first season, or until a perfect cohesion, healing over and growth has taken place, to protect the graft from the dry- ing influence of the air, by a firm, well-made mound of earth placed around it, and made high enough to extend to the upper bud of the graft, even slightly covering the same. In a region where the winters are not so se- vere as to endanger the life of the European grape, this mound may be gradually removed entirely, in others it should be carefully examined from time to time, and any roots having formed from the graft should be cut off and removed. We spoke before of the "whip-gkaft" and the "Champin-graft" as being prefer- able for small stocks or for cuttings grafted upon cuttings. The ordinary whip-graft (the greffe angJaise of the French) is well known to our horticulturists, and, probably, to most of our readers ; it is this graft which is most generally employed by our nurserymen in the propagation of all small fruit trees, in making root-grafts, and it is especially convenient for grafting in-doors, for the "graft on the table" or for the "'graft by the hearth-stone," as the French designate it. In France millions of this grape-graft are 38 Graftimj. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Grafting. made every winter, mostly on rooted plants of one year's growth, but very many also on simple cuttings of Phylloxera-resisting va- rieties. The stocks and scions should both be pro- vided in good season and kept well preserved in sand, sawdust, moss, or other suitable materi- al, and stowed away in a convenient place in the cellar. For this method of grafting it is very desirable, though not really es- sential, that the stock and scion should be as nearly as possible of a uniform size. The ordinary whip- graft, as employed for the grape, is best explained by the ac- companying Figs. 51 and 52. The improved whip-grafting, or the "Cham- pin-graft" \la grejf'e Champing ^ we will de- scribe by a free translation of that chapter of his book treating thereon : Let us operate first on a rooted plant or a rooted internode ; with the pruning shears, or, better still, with the knife, cut off the top as close as possible below an eye or joint at the collar. After the top has been taken off there remains but little difference between a plant and a rooted joint.* With a coarse rag wipe off all sand and grit from that portion of the shoot to 1)6 grafted. Then with a grafting- knife, which should be simple and strong, with a A'ery thin, but wide and not too long blade (see Fig. 53), make a nice, straight and Fis. 55. Fig. 54. Fig. 5.3. regular slit or cleft, from above downwards, and at one-third or one-fourth of the diameter (1^ to 2h inches in length), according to the size of the subject (Fig, 54). Then, holding the stock in your left hand in the manner shown in Fig. 55, with the palm of the hand turned up, cut the thickest part of the split end to an exact smooth bevel, of equal length as the cleft, as shown in Fig. 56. * By " rooted joints" (merithtille racine) Mr. Champin designates portions of a cane, layei'ed tlie pi-evious summer, which lias sent out loots from its dilferent eyes or nodes. For grafting purposes, it will 1)0 seen, these rooted internodcs answer all purposes if they have good strong roots, even though no top growth has pushed from the eyes which were buried in the gi-ound. Fig. 56. Fiu-. 07. Grafting. GRAPE MANUAL. Graftiiu/. 39 This operatiou is not at all difficult ; but, in order to perform it easily, it re- quires a very sharp knife, ground to a tine edge from the upper side only. The graft or scion, which should be selected as nearl}^ as possible cor- responding in size or thickness with the stock, and generally with two eyes, is prepared, split and cut precisely in the same manner as the stock, except onl}^ of course, that the cleft and tongue will be at the lower ex- tremity instead of at the upper. (See g. Fig. oG.) In later practice Mr. Champin found it more expedient to reduce some- what the length of the cuts for the clefts and tlie tongues of the stock and scion, making their length about equal to three times their diameter. Fipr. 58. Having thus prepared both stock and scion, it is a verj- easy matter to unite and adjust them, as shown by Fig. 57, taking care that the bark of both fit together exactly- and snugly, at least on one side. The graft is now ready for the tie, which should be of some strong, pliable material. Linden-bass is very good, but any small, strong twine will answer. In France, "Ra- phia," the product of a palm leaf, is used very extensively for this purpose. The tie should be adjusted firmly. Fig. 58 shows graft." a well-made " Champin- It now remains to be covered with a thin but well-applied coating of grafting claj',* and after that will be ready for planting out ; or, if the operation is performed in winter, before the planting season, it may be stored in the cellar, or some other suit- able place, carefull}' packed away in sand or sawdust. The operation of grafting upon simple cuttings is performed in precisely the same manner. A grafted cutting is shown in Fig. 59. The grafted cutting should be planted out in nursery rows and grown there for one season before they are set out for permanent vine- yard plantation. This plan is pur- sued on a ver}^ extensive scale in France. It may sometimes be desirable to graft on a layered cane ; for in- stance, in filling a vacancy in a vineyard-row, or in cases where no good place can be obtained for inserting a graft at the collar of an old vine to be operated upon ; in such cases a thrifty young cane is graft- ed at some desira- ble point near its end. The graft may be either an ordin- ary cleft -graft, a ||j|\\ common wliip- graft, or a Cliam- pin-graft, or, as the illustration ( Fig. 60) shows, a sad- dle-graft. The sad- dle-graft is nothing else than an invert- ed cleft-graft, the cleft being made in the scion, while Fig- 59. the tongue or wedge is cut on the stock. Fig. 60 shows the layered cane and graft, and will make the operation plain to the reader. One great ad- vantage of grafting a layered cane is that the stock is not sacrificed in case the graft should *A narrow strip of tin-foil, wound around the graft, makes an excellent sul^stitute for grafting clay or wax. If well put on, it will exclude all air and moisture. Of late years bottle-coi'ks, split from the side to the center and the latter slightly hollowed out, to admit the graft, have come into use. The cork is slipped over the graft and then firmly tied with a couple of light iron wires, thus answering the purposes of both clay and tie. While we have no personal experience with this method, nor any direct reports on ils results, it seems to us that it should be very successful, when used for eIoc/raphische Beri elite as follows: "In the month of May, when the young shoots have not yet become woody, but have already well- developed eyes at the base of the leaf, the shoot Avhich is to be grafted is cut off close below an eye ; it is then split nearly up to the ej'e below the cut. The scion, which has been taken from a suitable young shoot, is cut to one eye with a long, thin wedge, below which it is fitted nicely into the split. The graft is then wrapped with woolen 3'arn. After a few days the eye will begin to swell and grow, and after a com- plete union has taken place will de- velop shoots of a yard (over 90 centim.) or more in length, the same season. During the first winter the grafted canes should be laid down and covered, to protect them from injury b}^ frost. The advantages of this method of grafting are, that fruit ma}"- often be obtained the first season, that several grafts can be made on the same stock, and that the operation is a very easy one ; a skilled hand can easily graft one hundred and fifty or more in a day ; and that it is performed at a time when other work in the vineyard is, comparativel}-, not very pressing." Another method of grafting, above the ground, is by GRAFTING BY APFROACH OR INARCHING. For this method it is desirable that two plants, one each of the variety which is to form the stock, and one of the scion, are planted close together, say about one foot apart. In June (the first year, if the plants make a sufficiently strong growth, if not, the second year), or as soon as the young shoots become sufficiently hard and woody to bear the knife, a shoot is taken from both the stock and the scion vine, and at a convenient place, where the}' ma}^ be brought in contact, a shaving is taken out from each of these, on the side next to the other, for a length of two or three inches. This must be done with a smooth cut of a sharp knife, a little deeper than the inner bark, so as to obtain on each a flat surface. They are then fitted snugly together, so that the inner bark joins as much as possible, and are wrapped securel}'- with some old calico strips, or with soft bass strings. Besides this, it is well to place one tie a little below, and one above the grafted point, and also to tie the united canes to a stake or trellis to insure against all chances of loosening by the swaying of the wind. The rapid swelling of the young growth at this period of the year makes it desirable that the grafts be looked over after a few weeks, replacing such ties which may have burst, and loosening others which may bind so as to cut into the wood. A union will generall}' be made in the course of two or three weeks, which will be further consoli- Graftincj. GRAPE MANUAL. Grafting. 41 dated in the course of six to eight weeks, when the bandages may be removed and the grafted portion left exposed to the sun, to thoroughly harden and ripen it. The shoots themselves are to be left to grow undisturbed for the rest of the season. In the fall, if a good union has taken place, the cane forming the scion is cut close below its union with the stock cane, which in its turn is cut close above the connection. Supposing the stock to have been a Concord and scion a Dela- ware, we now have a vine of the latter en- tirely on the strong, vigorous root of the former. Of course constant vigilance must be exercised to prevent suckers from start- ing out of the stock. It is well to protect the grafted joint the first few winters by a slight covering of straw or soil to prevent the frost from spliting it apart. Another mode of grafting above ground (copied from "The Gardner's Monthly" by W. C. Strong in his valuable work, "The Cultivation of the Grape" ) is not merely interesting in itself, but also illustrative of many other modifications in grafting: (See Fig. 61.) "After the first four or five leaves are formed, and the sap is flowing, you choose the place on the vine where you intend to graft. At that point wrap a twine tightly several times around the vine. This will, in a measure, prevent the return sap. Below the ligature make a sloping cut down, as shown at a; also, a similar reversed one above the ligature, as at &, about one inch in length. In selecting a scion prefer one that has naturally a bend. Cut it so that it shall be wedge-shape at both ends, and a little longer than the distance between the cuts in the vine at a and b. Insert the scion, taking care to have the barks in direct con- tact, securing it with a string, c, bound round both scion and vine sufficiently tight to force the scion-ends into their places. If the work is done well, no tie will be required at a and 6, but the joints shoiild be covered with grafting wax. In a short time, the bud at d will commence its growth, after which you can, by degrees, remove all the growing shoots not belonging to the scion, and in course of the summer you may cut off the wood above b, and in the fall remove all above a on the stock and above c on the scion." 61. In "Orchard and Garden" (Feb., 1891), that veteran Missouri-Kansas viticulturist, Dr. J. Stayman of Leavenworth, gives an article on grafting the grape, from which we make the following extract, as his method of preparing the stock differs materiall}' from the cleft-grafting which we have before de- scribed and the Doctor has been so very suc- cessful in his grafting operations that his- method should be widely known. Dr. Stay- man insists upon selecting scions at least & to 8 inches long and not less than two buds, which can best be fitted to the stock to be operated on. He then says: " For grafting grapes the tools required are a good, sharp shoemaker's knife, a light mallet, fine saw, pruning shears and a ball of grocer's wrap- ping twine. We put all these into a basket and wrap the graft-wood in a damp sack, and go to work." We employ a per- son to go ahead and dig out with a spade the ground all a- round the vines, down to a point below the first tier of roots, say 8 inches deep. In spading down na attention is paid to the surface roots as they must all be cut away to get down to a clean stock to graft. This assistant must not go too far //^ ahead of the graft- er, as the stocks should not be too long exposed to the sun in that open condition. If the stock is not more than half or three quarters of an inch through: cut it off with the pruning shears, but if larger, saw it off about six or seven inches below the surface. Take off the outside bark,* (Fig. 62) select the most favorable side and cut a slope on the side about one inch and a half long, and about one-fourth of an inch deep at the * The Doctor lays Rrciit stress upon the removal of the outside bark of tlie storks in all his grafting. He says: " We take the hark off the stock in grafting, not only for the purpose of seeing that the grafts tit and that they are properly adjusted, but also that the damp soil may come in contact with the inner bark so that callus may form soon, as well as keep the grafts alive until united, or roots are thrown out to support it." "Care should be used, however, not to cut or scrape into tlie inner or live green bark which is firmly united to the wood. Remove only the dead outer bark which separates freely from the other." 42 Grafting. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Grafting. top. The length and the depth of this slope depends to some extent upon the size of the stock. Set the knife about one-eighth of an inch from the top of the slope, and drive it down with the mallet about one inch and a quarter or more deep, to form a tongue in the stock. The knife must be set exactly, or it will cut too shallow or too deep, but a little practice will soon determine this matter. If it is cut too deep the tongue will be too stiff and unyielding, and if too shallow it will be too flimsy to hold the graft. If the stock is, sa^^ three-quarters of an inch or more in diameter, insert two grafts, one on each side, Ijut if less, one stout graft will be sufficient. Cut the grafts long enough that the upper bud will be just about above the level of the ground, or a little above, but never under the surface. Slope the grafts on one side onl}^ about one inch and a half long, to a thin edge below. Take the outside bark off from the graft up as high as the slope. Then cut a tongue in the graft (just like the scions of root-grafted apples are cut), about one inch and a quarter deep. In cutting the tongue, the outside of it should be a little larger than the inside, to make a neat fit. When inserting the grafts they cannot be made to match the stock at ever^^ part of the slope, in fact, pay no attention to that; but find the place where the}^ do and push them down ti.ght and Jinn. Then as a precaution against moving, wrap a tie around to keep the grafts in place while working al)out them. Fis. 63. Stock axd Graft Below Grouxd. First fill in a little good soil below and pack it down firmly around the graft with the hands. Then fill in about half full and tramp carefully around the graft to make it firm. Then fill up level with the surface, and put a stake to mark the place as well as to tie the grafts to when they grow. We refrain from speaking of other methods of grafting, as Ave believe the modes of CLEKT-grafting as well as the wiiir-graft and CHAMPix-graft, which we have described and illustrated by plain figures, are those which give the best results, generall3\ The exten- sive grafting operations of France are mostly confined to these methods, and practical ex- perience is the best teacher in such matters. We also deem it unnecessary to speak of the many machines and tools lately invented for grafting ; as a good pruning knife, as de- scribed, is the tool most in use, and quite satisfactory in skilled hands. W"e should here mention that, generally speaking, our American varieties do not take the graft as readil}^ and surely as the Euro- pean species. A graft of T^. Vinifer(( on an American stock will rarelj^ fail to grow if the operation has been properly performed ; while success is not quite as certain when both, stock and scion, consist of American varieties, especiall}^ if of the hard-wooded kinds. Nev- ertheless, when well done, at the proper season and with well-conditioned wood, the operation will show a far greater percentage of success than of failure. In our former edition we promised to ex- periment more largely with the grafting of European varieties on our native stocks here. Vi^e have made these experiments, and in Sep- tember, 1880, we exhibited in St. Louis, at the meeting of the Mississippi Valle}^ Horti- cultural Society, a number of fine foreign grapes, raised in open air. on grafted vines, in our own vineyards. But while success, in so far as protecting the European grape from the Phylloxera, has been highly satis- factory, we have found our climate, in this latitude, too unfavorable for the V. Vinifera to encourage us for more extensive operation. Not only are our winters too severe for the V. Vinifera, l)ut the tendency of the latter to mildew makes their success too doubtful in all but the most favorable seasons. For our section of the United States, therefore, we would not recommend anything further than limited trials in this direction. But we think that there is a valuable field of operation for the enterprising grape-grower in some sec- tions of the Southern States, where, under more favorable climatic conditions, the V. Vinifera, grafted upon Phylloxera-proof native stocks, would most likel}- give ex- cellent results. Just as we close this chapter on grafting, we receive the sad news of the death oi. Mr. Aime Champin, who passed away on April 14, 1894. By his death, French viticulture, yes, we may saV> grape cultui-e throughout the world loses one of her brightest and moi^t eminent devotees. A man of the highest intelligence, endowed with rare gifts of observation, he was an ardent student of nature, imbued with a deep spirit and a truly practical sense of her teachings, her wonders and her raj^steries, which sense and J spirit he had the happy faculty to impart to all ^ his writings. He was one of the warmest cham- pions for fhe resistant American grape root in its Grafting. GRAPE MANUAL. Planting. 43 mission of reconstituting tlie Phylloxera — de- stroyed French vineyards, and by his practical example as well as by his writings he has con- tributed a large share to the great success of that mission. His unsurpassed work on grafting, which we mentioned before, will stand as a last- ing monument to his name. PLANTING (Coutinued). But now let us return to themodus operandi of planting. Take your vines, in a pail with water, or wrapped in a wet cloth, from the place where they were heled-iu,* to the holes ; when planting, let one person shorten the roots-f with a sharp knife, then spread them out evenl}^ to all sides, and let another fill in with well pulverized earth. The earth should be worked in among the roots with the fingers, and pressed to them with the foot. Lay the vine in slanting, and let its top come out at the stake pre^iously set. Then, with your knife, cut back the top to a bud just above, or even with the surface of the ground. Do not leave more than two buds on any one of the 3'oung vines which you are planting, however strong the tops, or however stout and wiry the roots ma^' be. One cane is sufficient to grow, and merely to be prepared for pos- sible accident, both buds are allowed to start. The weaker of the two shoots may afterwards be removed or pinched back. When planted in the fall, raise a small mound around your vine, so that the water will drain off, and in sections where the win- ters are very severe mounds should be made a little higher, even covering the upper buds, and a covering provided that will col- lect and hold the snow, which will be a warmer and better protection than manures ; these should not be used on newly planted young vines. In spring the mounds should be carefully levelled down. * On receiving your vines from the nursery, they should be taken out of the box, without delay, and heled-in, which is done as follows: In a dry and well protected situation, a trench is made in the soil 12 to 15 inches deep, wide enough to receive the roots of the plants, and of any requii'ed length, the soil being thrown out upon one si^Ie. The plants are then set thickly together in the trench, with the tops in a slop- ing direction and against the bank of soil thrown out of the trench; another trench is made parallel to the first, and the soil taken from it is thrown into the first, covering the I'oots carefully, filling in all of the inter- stices between them. Press down the soil, and smooth off the surf!»ce, so that water shall not lodge thereon. \Vhen one trench is finished, set the plants in the next, and proceed as before. When all this is completed, dig a shallow trench around the whole, so as to carry off the water and keep the situation dry. "•■ If the roots are not too long, say not over 15 to 18 inches, they do not need shortening, merely trimming off any ragged or broken ends. The holes should be dug large enough, however, to accommodate the roots without twisting or crowding. It is a well-authenticated fact that, under the action of nitrogenous agents, the grape grows more luxuriantly, its leaves are larger, its product increases in quantity. But over- feeding produces a sappy growth of soft and spongy wood, with feeble buds or eyes, whi?li are in far greater danger of being winter- killed. Moreover, nitrogenous substances exclusively used hasten the decay of vine- yards and the exhaustion of the soil, and even those authorities who favor manures in j>re- paring certain grounds, or long ajter plant- ing, mean a compost made of old barnyard manure, leaf mould, broken bones, etc., laid up to rot and frequently turned ; but do not allow any decomposing organic matter to come in contact with the newl}^ planted vine. Yet, a favorable climate, a suitable soil and situation, sound, strong, well-rooted. No. 1 plants, properly planted, are not sufficient for success in grape-growing — the vine must have besides proper treatment and cultivation ; and there is perhaps no fruiting plant that bears skillful training more kindly, or which responds more abundantly to the attention of the careful grower. And the fact that al- most equally good results appear to be ob- tained, for particular purposes and varieties, under various different methods, caused a great diversity of opinion as to the proper system or greater advantages of any method of training and pruning the vine. The value of removing a portion of the wood of a grape-vine was brought to notice by observing the effect produced by the browsing of a goat. American grape culture is 3'et in an experimental stage. Half a cen- tury ago, European methods were the only ones practiced ; and though the fundamental principles are alike for both European and American grapes, our l)est viticulturists gradually recognized that widely differing varieties require different treatment, and that American species of grapes l)eing widely different and distinct from the European, l\xQy demand also different methods of treat- ment in some important details. The evolu- tion of American grape training — say^s Prof. L. H. Baily of Ithaca, N. Y., (in the preface to his excellent treatise on American Grape- Training, 1893) is one of the most unique and signal developments ( f our modern horti- culture and its very recent departure from the early doubts and trials is a fresh illustra- tion of the youth and virility^ of all horti- cultural pursuits in North America. It would be impossible to describe all the variations in grape- training in the space of this brief manual : no hard and fast lines can be laid down, either for anj' sj^stem or any 44 Planting. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Trellis. variet}^ and the attempt to do so would only be confusing. During the first shimmer little else can be done than to keep the ground mellow, loose al^out the plants and free from weeds ; stir- ring the ground frequeutl}', especially in dry weather, is the best stimulant, and a finely tilled surface, even when reduced to a mere layer or bed of dust, is the very best mulch in a dry season. It is not necessary to tie up the 3'oung vines during the first summer, nor to pinch back the laterals. A stouter, short-jointed cane will thus be produced. Some grape-growers prefer, however, to al- low but one shoot, the strongest, to grow, and break the others off, then tie this one shoot to a stake, and pinch back the laterals to one or two leaves each. In the fall, after the foliage is all off, cut back to tivo or three buds. If any vacancies have occurred, fill out, as soon as possible, with extra strong vines of the same variet}'. During the following winter, the trellis should be built. The plan adopted by most of our experienced grape-growers, as pos- sessing some advantages over other plans, especially if grapes are grown in large quan- FiK- 64.— (Four wires, 15 inches apart.) inches from the ground. No. 12 wire is strong enough. At the present prices of wire the cost per acre will be from $15 to $30, according to distance of rows and num- ber of wires used. Manj'^ grape-growers now place the lower wire about 30 inches from the ground and use only two wires, or if they use three, they cai-ry the trellis cor- respondingly higher. This affords a better circulation of air, besides greater conveni- ence in hoeing and cultivating. Galvanized wire is the best and cheapest in any case. Fig. 65. titles, is as follows: Posts of some durable timber (red cedar is best) are split, 3 inches thick and about 7 feet long, so as to be 5 feet in height after l)eing set ; these posts are set in holes 2 feet deep, 16 to 18 feet apart in the rows (so that either two vines 8 feet apart, or three vines 6 feet ai)art, are between two stakes) : three wires are then stretched horizontally along the posts, being fastened to each post with a staple f|. The two end- posts should be larger than the others and braced (Fig. 64) so that the contraction of the wire (in cold weather) will not loosen them. Instead of the brace a short wire may be fastened to the top of the end-post and anchored to a rock sunk in the ground, or to a short stake about 3 or 4 feet beyond the end of the trellis, ])ut in line with the same. The first wire is placed about 1 8 inches from the ground and the others ] 8 inches apart ; this brings the upper wire about 4 feet 6 In place of the wire, slats or laths maj' serve the same purpose (as seen in Fig. 65), but they are not durable, and the posts must then be put in much closer. Another mode of making wire trellis (the Fuller plan) is with horizontal bai's and perpendicular wires, as shown in Fig. Q6. Posts of good, hard. Trellis. GRAPE MANUAL. Training. 45 durable wood, 3 inches in diameter and 6i to 7 feet long, are placed between the vines, at equal distance from each vine, and in a line with them, 2 feet deep in the ground. When the posts are set, nail on strips about 2i inches wide and 1 inch thick, one strip or bar being placed 1 foot from the ground, and the other at the top of the posts. Then take No. 16 wire and put it on perpendicularly, twist- ing it around the lower and upper bar, at a distance of about 12 inches apart. As a pound of No. 16 wire gives 102 feet, the ad- ditional expense is but \QYy small. This trellis will probably cost less than one with horizontal wires, and is preferred b}^ some. Practical experience, however, speaks in favor of horizontal wires. A good man}' grape-growers train their vines to stakes^ believing it to be cheaper ; and the decline in the price of grapes and wine induces many to adopt the least costly plan. This method has also the great advantage of allowing us to cultivate, plow and cross-plow the "*„ ground in all directions, leaving but little to hoe around the vines. Some use one stake only, as shown in Fig. 67, but with our strong growers this mode is apt to crowd foliage and fruit too much ; others there- fore use ttoo, and, where timber is plenty, even three stakes, placed around each vine, about 10 inches from it, and wind its canes around them spirall}^ until they reach tlie top. The disadvantage of training on stakes is, that these soon rot in the ground, and must be al- most annually taken out, repointcd and driven into the soil, consequently require more labor, and are not as durable as trellis, un- less cedar poles, or other very durable timber is used. A very simple combination of the trellis and stake system (as shown in Fig. 68) requires but one wire for the bearing Fig. 67 canes and much lighter stakes ; but this method does not afford the advantage of cross-plowing. To secure this advantage and at the same time to give to our strong growers more space and the benefits of high training, we recom- mend an '^ Arbor Trellis," the construction of which is shown in Fig;. 69. Though more Fig. 68. Fig. 69. expensive in construction than the ordinary trellis, this overhead system affords many advantages, especially for our strong growing and hardy varieties. A comparatively greater freedom from fungoid diseases, increased productiveness, with the cost of cultivation and hand labor reduced to a minimum, are the principal advantages. For this method of training the vines should be tied up the first summer already' to a high- er stake or pole, and if the}' make a sutficient growth, the permanent stakes, which form the support of the overhead trellis, may be set during the first winter. These stakes should be about 7^ feet long, of some durable wood. They need not be veiy heavy as they are tied or braced together at the top in each direc- tion by the slats running lengthwise and crosswise, which gives this trellis an unusual strength of construction. The height of the trellis should be six feet above the ground, enabling an ordinary horse or mule to pass underneath in cultivating. The young vine at the end of the first season should be pruned long enough to reach up to the trellis, and allowed there to branch out and spread over the horizontal wires. In subsequent years a modified form of renewal pruning, or simplj^ spur pruning, or a combination of both may be adopted. In tieing up the cane of the first season's growth, it is well to wind it in a long spiral around the stake or post. This gives it a better hold, and as the vines grow hea\ier will hold the stakes in place even if it should rot off at the bottom. Summei'- pruning and tying is almost entirely dis- pensed with. The fruit-gathering is, how- ever, less convenient, and none but quite 46 Training. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Pruning. hardy, vigorous varieties should be thus trained. Some people believe that we could even dis- pense with both trellis and stakes entirely, and urge the adoption of the " Souche " or "Buck Pruning" plan, used in parts of France and Switzerland, but quite impracti- cable for our strong growing species m tliis climate. If you have covered your .young vines last fall, remove the earth from over them at the approach of spring, as soon as danger from frost is past; then cultivate the whole ground., plowing Itetween the rows j|_^ from four to six inches Jr*~M. deep, and carefully hoeing / | around the vines with the two-pronged German hoe or Karst.1 or H«^xaiiKn'''s ]>ro/iged hoe. The ground should thus be broken up, inverted, and kept in a mellow condition continu- ally; but do not work the ground, lohen icet. During the second .snninier a cane or shoot is produced from each of the two or three buds which were left on the 3'ouug vine last fall. Of these 3'oung shoots, if there are three, leave only the two strongest, tying them neatlj- to the trellis, and let them grow unchecked to the uppermost wire. With the strong-growing varieties, espe- cially where we intend to grow the fruit on laterals or spurs, the two main canes are pinched off when they reach the second hori- zontal wire, whereby the laterals are forced into stronger growth, each forming a medium- sized cane, which is shortened in the fall from four to six buds. One of the two main canes may be layered in June, covering it with mel- low soil, about an inch deep, leaving the ends of the laterals out of the ground. These will general!}' make good plants in the fall for furtiier plantations ; with varieties which do not grow easily from cuttings, this method is particularly desirable. Fig. 70 shows the vines tied and pruned, accordingly, at the end of the second season, (the cross lines through the canes showing wliere they are cut off or pruned). Another good mode of training, recom- mended by Fuller, is to bend down in fall, at the end of second season, the two main canes of the vines (the laterals of which have been pinched back to concentrate the growth into these main canes) in opposite directions, la3ing and tying them against the lower wire or bar of the trellis, as shown in Fig. 06, and shortening them to four feet each. Then let five or six of the buds on the upper side of the arms be grown into upright canes. (Fig. FiL'. 70. Fi.s. 71. 71.) All buds ami shoots not wanted for upright canes should be rubbed or broken off. This latter method is not well adapted for varieties which require covering in winter. Where the canes are started lower, near the ground, and cut loose from the wire, they can be easily covered with earth. At the commencement of the third ."tea.son (uncover and) tie the canes to the trellis. For tying, any soft string or stout yarn may be used : some obtain their tying material from basswood-bark, soaked for two weeks or longer in running water, others i)lant the Golden Willow, and use its small twigs for tying purposes. Tie closely, and as young canes grow keep them tied, but, in all cases, take care against tying too tightl}', as the free flow of sap may be obstructed. The ground is now plowed and hoed again, as before. One j^lowing in spring, taking care, however, not to cut or tear the roots of the vines, and two or more shallow cultiva- tions in summer. From each of the buds left at the last pruning (as shown in the preceding figures), canes can be grown during the third year, and each of these canes will l)robably bear two or three bunch- es of fruit. There is danger of their being injured by over-bear- ing, on which account the bunches should be thinned out by taking away all imperfect bunches and feeble shoots. Pruning. GRAPE MANUAL. Pruning. 47 No grape-vine, however trained and appar- ently strong, should ever be allowed to carry more fruit than it can bring to perfect maturity and at the same time produce healthy and well-ripened canes for the next season's liearing. Over-bearing is always at- tended with unfortunate results, saj^s Geo. W. Campbell — and there is no better teacher of grape culture living; — from this cause the healthiest vine ma}- be so enfeebled as to be destroyed by any unusual severit}^ the follow- ing winter ; or, when the injury is not so seri- ous, the vine may bear a light inferior crop the following j'ear, but remain weak forever. In order to secure future fruitfulness of the vine, and at the same time to keep it in our convenient control, we should allow no more wood to grow than we need for next season's bearing, and for this purpose we re- sort to sprhig prnnhig, generally, though im- properly, called SUM.^IER PRUNING. The time to perform the first summer prun- ing is when the young shoots are about six inches long, and when you can plainly see all the small bunches — the embryo fruit. We commence at the two lower spurs, having two buds each, and both started. One of them we intend for a bearing cane next summer, therefore allow it for the present to grow vjichecked, tjdng it, if long enough, to the lowe-t wire. The other, wiiich we intend for a spur again next fall, we pinch with the thumb and finger to just beyond the last bunch or Ijutton, taking out the leader be- tween the last bunch and the next leaf, as shown in Fig. 72, the cross line indicating ^1h^_ Fig. 72. where the leader is to be pinched off. We now come to the next spur, on the opposite side, where we also leave one cane to grow unchecked, and pinch off the other. We now go over all the shoots coming from the arms or laterals tied to the trellis, and also pinch them beyond the last bunch. Should any of the buds have pushed out two shoots, we rub off the weakest ; we also take off all the barren or weak shoots which may have started from the foot of the vine. The bearing branches having all been pinched back, we can leave our vines alone until after the bloom, onl}; tying up the young canes from the spurs, should it become neces- sary. Do not, however, tie them over the bearing canes, but lead them to the empty space on both sides of the vine, as our object must be to give the fruit all the air and light we can without depriving it of the necessary foliage, which is of greatest importance for the formation of sugar in the berries. To do so the leaves must be well developed and healthy. Diseased, mildewed foliage, how- ever, will not promote the sugar formation, but rather impede the same. B}' the time the grapes have bloomed, the laterals will have pushed from the axils of the leaves on the bearing shoots. Now go over these again, and pinch each lateral back to one leaf, as shown in Fig. 73. In a short time the laterals on the fruit-bearing branches which have been pinched, will throw out suckers again. These are again stopped, leading one leaf of the 3'Oung growth. Leave the laterals on the canes intended for next 3^ear's fruiting to grow unchecked, tying them neatly to the wires with bass or pawpaw bark, or with rye straw. If you prefer training your vines on the horizontal arm system (Fig. 71) the mode of summer pruning will in the main be the same. Pinch off the end of each upright shoot .-.>>.\>ret.\V V Fiir. 74. Elbert Wakemans Method ofTraining. Oyster Bay, L.I. Filiacdoma ampelinum, which by some authorities has been supposed to be another form of development of our black rot, above described. The former attacks all the green parts, leaves, young stems, and green berries, and forms open wounds, which might be compared to ulcers ; while our Phoma is restricted, as far as known, onlj^ to green berries, without breaking up the tissues or forming ulcers. The Sphaceloma seems to be an old disease in Europe, already known in the last century'. Mycologists are now carefully studying these questions." Fungous Diseases of the Grape and their Treatment. BY B. T. GALLOWAY. Since the last edition of this catalogue won- derful progress has been made in the study of the fungous diseases of plants, especially those affecting the grape. Black rot, the scourge which at one time threatened the vine industry of this country, need no longer be feared, nor is there any cause for appre- hension on account of the Peronospora, or downy mildew, as it is now one of the easiest diseases to control. The object of this paper is to bring together briefl}^, plainly, and practically the latest in- formation in regard to the more destructive diseases affecting the vine in this country, especially such facts on ti-eatment as have been brought out by the recent investigations and experiments. THE destructive FUNGOUS DISEASES AFFECTING THE VINE. Several hundred species of fungi, or micro- scopic plants, are known to attack the grape, but fortunately only four of these cause se- rious diseases in the United States. The dis- eases in question are black rot, down}' mildew or brown rot, powdery mildew, and anthrac- nose. The foregoing will be briefl}^ described in such a way that it is hoped grape growers may be able to distinguish them, and therebj!- be better qualified to adopt the preventive measures suggested. Black rot.* — The disease which for forty years or more has been known by the fore- going name, occurs in nearly all parts of the * Guignardia bidwellii (Ell.) V. & R. 54 Diseases. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Galloway. country east of the Rock}' Mountains. So far as we are aware it has not reached Cali- fornia, but it is probably only a question of time when it will appear there. While black rot is present everywhere east of the Missis- sippi River, it is in and south of the States of New Jersey, Virginia, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and Missouri that it has proved most virulent, frequently' destroying from 50 to 100 per cent of the crop. In 1885 the disease appeared in France, and for a time caused much alarm in all the grape-growing regions of Europe. Black rot ma}^ be distinguished from the other diseases under consideration in several waj's. In the first place it must be borne in mind that it is not confined to the fruit, but occurs on the leaves and young branches as well. The berries when first attacked show at one or more points upon their surface small, brownish, more or less circular discolor- ations. These rapidly enlarge and soon the rest of the berry turns brown, while the part first attacked assumes a blackish hue. Minute pimples now appear scattered irregularly' over Fig. 77.— Bi.ACK HOT. the surface, and finally the berry withers, turns black, and ultimately dries up, but as a rule remains firmly attached to the stalk, as shown in Fig. 77. As a rule the leaves show the disease about two days before the berries are attacked. Reddish-brown, more or less circular spots appear, and these soon run together, forming irregular-shaped blotche.'^. ^^'hat distinguishes I he spots or blotches on the leaves from sim- ilar discolorations produced by certain at- mospheric conditions is the presence of black specks, no larger than a pin point, scattered over the surface or grouped in a narrow band near the edge of the affected parts. The specks may be seen with the naked eye, but with a low-power magnifying glass they are brought out more prominently. Doirny mikleir.* — The diseases known in various sections as American mildew, brown rot, gray rot, grape Peronospora, etc , are all due to one and the same fungus, viz, 7'ero/(OS- 2)ora viticola. The dowu}^ mildew fungus has a wider distribution than black rot, and prob- ably in the aggregate causes more damage. It occurs in nearly all the grape-growing regions of this country, and is also common in Europe and other parts of the Eastern Hemisi^here. Leaves affected with downy mildew show upon the upper surface greeuish-3'ellow or brownish spots, of irregular size and shape, while opposite these discolorations, on the lower side, a downy, whitish, frost-like growth may be seen. In advanced stages of lijr. Ts.— Hhowx rot. the disease or after a heavy rain the frost-like patches often disappear, leaving in their places light brown discolorations correspond- ing in size and shape with those on the upper side. The fruit is frequently Attacked, especially when 3'oung, the berries being covered with the downy, whitish growth of the fungus, sim- ilar to that occurring on the leaves. It is very common also in many sections to find * Peronospora viticola B. & C Diseases. GRAPE MANUAL. Treatment. 55 berries rotting from the attacks of this fungus and yet showing no external evidence of the parasite. Bro^^n rot is the name usually given to this form of the disease. Berries affected with brown rot show at first small, purplish brown spots. Soon the entire berry turns brown, and the pulp becomes soft and often shriuks, forming depressions, over which the wrinkled but otherwise smooth and un- broken skin is stretched (Fig. 78). Powdery Milclew.* — Powdery mildew at- tacks the leaves, young shoots, and berries, covering the same with a whitish, cobweb-like growth. This disease is also widely distrib- uted, being especiallj^ troublesome on the Vinifera grapes of the Pacific coast and Eu- rope, and causing what is generally known as the Grape-vine Oidium. Leaves affected with the fungus show usually upon the upper sur- face a whitish, web-like, powdery growth, which is not restricted by anything like a definite border. The fruit shows a similar growth on the surface, but eventuall}'', as a result of the attack of the parasite, the skin of the berries cracks, admitting other agents of decay, which soon finish the work of de- struction. Anthraoiose.f — This disease has of late years attracted considerable attention in this country, where it occurs on the leaves, young shoots, and fruit. It prevails also in Europe, but has never proved as serious there as the downy and powdery mildews. Leaves when first affected with this dis- ease show minute blackish-brown spots, which are surrounded with a slightly raised ■darker-colored margin. Ultimately the cen- ter of the spots turns gray, and not infre- quently the diseased parts separate from the surrounding healthy portions, leaving the leaf full of small, ragged-edged holes. On the shoots the disease manifests itself in much the yame way as it does on the leaves. As it progresses, however, the spots usually retain their dark color and often run together, form- ing more or less elongated diseased areas, which gradually eat their way into the wood, and it is now known that the mycelium, or bod}^ of the fungus, passes the winter in the tissues surrounding these places. Anthracnose on the fruit, or bird's-ej^e rot, as it is sometimes called, first appears as a black or brownish circular spot, surrounded by a narrow, somewhat darker rim. As the spots increase in size the color undergoes various changes. In some cases the outside rim remains dark brown, while inside of this is a wider zone of a beautiful vermilion color, * Unciuula spiralis Berk. + Spaceloina aniplinum l)e Bary. Fig. 79.— Anthracnose. surrounding a grayish- white center (Fig. 79). Frequently the spots, when less than one- eighth of an inch in diameter, assume a gray- ish-white color, which they retain throughout the rest of their growth. When the berries are small the disease often manifests itself in another way. The fruit turns brown and shrivels up, and at the same time little pinkish pustules appear on the surface. This form of rot is not characterized by a softening of the tissues, as is the case with others we have mentioned. The tissues slowly collapse, at the same time becoming hard and leathery. METHODS OF COMBATING THE DISEASES. With the exception of Anthracnose, all the diseases described in the foregoing pages may in large part be successfully combated by applying, at the proper time, either in the form of a liquid or powder, certain substances known as funs>icides. The fungicides do not injure the young and tender parts of the vine, but they do destroy or prevent the develop- ment of the parasitic organisms which bring about the diseases described. The applica- tion of a fungicide, therefore, acts, to a cer- tain extent, as a shield to the various parts of the grape, protecting them from infection in much the same way that a glass jar or paper bag would ])rotect. It will be seen from what has been said that the treatments are largely preventive, not curative, hence the import- ance of doing everything at the proper time, 56 Galloway. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Fungicides. the object being to keep ahead, so far as pos- sible, of the fungous parasites, which are read}" to infect the host whenever the proper condi- tions are present. The directions for treat- ment given in the accompanying pages are based on manj^ experiments, and if followed closeh' there is no reason why the work should not be successful. Of course it is manifestly impossible to lay down rigid rules in a case of this kind. Judgment must be exercised in all phases of the work. WHAT FUKGICIDES TO USE. For the diseases under consideration five fungicides have been used with varying de- grees of success. They are: (1) Bordeaux mixture. (2) Ammoniacal solution of copper carbon- ates. (3) Eau celeste. (4) Modified eau celeste. (5) Flowers of sulphur. Bordeaux mixture — This preparation should be made as follows : In a barrel that will hold 45 gallons dissolve 6 pounds of copper sulphate or bluestone, using 8 or 10 gallons of water, or as much as may be necessary for the purpose of dissolving. In a tub or halfbarrel slake 4 pounds of fresh lime. When completely slaked add enough water to make a creamy whitewash. Pour this slowly into the barrel containing the copper sulphate solution, using a coarse gunny sack stretched over the head of the barrel for a strainer. Finall}', fdl the barrel with water, stir thor- oughly, and the mixture is ready for use. Prepared in this wa}', the cost of 1 gallon of the mixture will not exceed 1 cent, estimating the price of copper sulphate at 7 cents per pound and lime at 30 cents per bushel. In all cases it is desirable to use powdered or granulated copper sulphate, as it costs but little more and dissolves much more readily. It is highly important that fresh lime be used. The copper sulphate may be quickly dissolved by tying the necessary amount in a piece of coarse sacking, then suspending the package just beneath the surface of the water in the barrel by means of a string or other simple device. By preparing the copper in this way it will usually be dissolved by the time the lime is ready for use. It has been found a great saving in time, to make up the mixture the night before. Ammoniacal solution of copper carbonate. — In an ordinary pail mix 5 ounces of cop- per carl)onate with enough water to make a thick paste, dissolve this paste in 3 pints of strong aqua ammonia, then dilute to 45 gal- lons. If 3 pints of ammonia are not sufficient to dissolve all the paste, add enough to bring about this result. Copper carbonate occurs in the market in tlie form of a tine, greenish powder. The retail price is usually 60 cents per pound. Aqua ammonia having a strength of 26 degrees retails at 8 cents per pound. Upon this basis 1 gallon of the ammoniacal solution of copper carbonate will cost 1 cent. In view of the fact that copper carbonate is sometimes difficult to obtain, the following direc- tions for manufacturing it are given: In a halfbarrel or some similar vessel dissolve 3 pounds of copper sulphate in 2 gallons of hot water. In another vessel dissolve 3^2 pounds of common washing soda or sal soda in 1 gallon of hot water. When cool pour the second solution slowly into the first; then, as soon as all action has ceased, add enough water to bring the whole up to 8 or 10 gallons and stir thoroughly. After twenty-four hours pour off the clear liquid, taking care not to disturb the sediment. Add fresh water and stir again. Again allow the solution to stand twenty-four hours, pour off the clear licpiid as before and then remove the sediment, which is copper carbonate. Prepared in this way there is formed Ifa pounds of copper carbonate, at an ex- pense for materials of approximatelj^ 18 cents per pound. The copper carbonate paste may be im- mediately dissolved in aqua ammonia, using 2 gallons of the latter, or as much as may be neces- sary for the purpose. This concentrated lluid should be kept in well-corked jugs, and when ready for use should be diluted at the rate of 1 pint to 12 gallons of water. Eau celeste. — Dissolve 2 pounds of cop- per sulphate in 8 gallons of water. AVhen completely dissolved add 3 pints of strong ammonia and dilute to 45 gallons. Prepared in this waj^ the solution will cost about § of a cent per gallon. Modified eau celeste. — Dissolve 4 pounds of copper sulphate in 10 to 12 gallons of water and stir in 5 pounds of washing soda or sal soda ; then add 3 pints of strong aqua ammonia and dilute to 45 gallons. The cost will be 1| ceuts per gallon. Flowers of sulpihur. — This requires no spe- cial preparation, being bought in the market ready for use. With regard to the foregoing, it may be said that Bordeaux mixture, taking all things into consideration, has proved the most effi- cient and therefore in the end the cheapest fungicide. It will be found equally effective for black rot, downy mildew, brown rot, and anthracnose. Another point of importance in regard to the use of Bordeaux mixture is that it influences the growtli of the vine in other ways besides merely preventing the at- tacks of fungi. In what manner this influ- ence or apparent stimulation is brought v about, we are not j^et in a position to state. 4 The ammoniacal solution, eau celeste, and modified eau celeste can l)e recommended only in certain cases, notably wlien it is de- sired to make applications near the close of Galloicay. GEAPE MANUAL. Treatment. 57 the season, at a time when a careless use of the Bordeaux mixture miglit spot the fruit. The eau celeste will in all cases have to be used with caution, as it is likely to injure the foliage, except in some few favored regions. It may be put down as an unsafe fungicide, and for this reason had perhaps better be left out of consideration entirely. WHEN AND now' TO APPI.Y THE FUNGICIDES. Before giving directions for the application of the fungicides the importance of keeping the vines in vigorous condition hy fertilization and cultivation of the soil, pruning, etc., must be emphasized. In other words, the vines should be aided in every way to resist, as far as possible, the attacks of the many parasitic foes to which they are subject. The careful vine3'ardist will attend to this, and as a result he will find that the health of his plants may be maintained with much less difficulty. For the prevention of black rot, make the first application of Bordeaux mixture just as the leaves begin to unfold. When the leaves are one-third grown make a second applica- tion of the same fungicide, following with a third when the vines are in full bloom. After this, applications should be continued at in- tervals of ten or twelve days, until the first signs of ripening are noticed. This will usually be three weeks or a month before the grapes are ready to pick. In no case should the treatment be continued up to the time of harvest, as this is entirely unnecessary, and moreover it is sure to render the fruit un- sightlj'. It is important to bear in mind that in case of dry weather the sprayings should cease. If it is desired to use the ammoniacal solu- tion or modified eau celeste instead of Bor- deaux mixture the applications may be made in the same way as recommended for the lat- ter fungicide. If the ammoniacal solution or modified eau celeste be used at all, it would perhaps be best to apply them toward the latter part of the season, as already sug- gested, after making the first two or three treatments with Bordeaux mixture. In regions where black rot, downy mildew, brown rot and anthracnose occur together the treatment recommended for black rot will answer for all. Where downy mildew and brown rot occur alone, and such regions are comparatively few, the first application of the fungicides may be postponed until the fruit is well formed. Anthracnose has proved more difficult to treat than black rot or downy mil- dew ; in fact no thoroughly reliable pre- ventive for this disease has as yet ))een discovered. For powdery mildew flowers of sulphur will probably prove the cheapest and most eflticient preventive. On the Pacific coast, where, as already pointed out, the parasite in question is most to l)e feared, the sulphur should be applied from one to three timea during the growing season, the number of ap- plications depending on the severity of the attacks of the fungus. The vines should be carefully watched and at the first appearance of the mildew on the lower leaves or fruit, an application of sulphur should be made. If in ten days or two weeks the disease still seems to be on the increase, a second application should be made, followed by a third if neces- sary. It is customary to make the first ap- plication when the shoots are four to six inches long, the second when the vines are in bloom, and the third when the fruit begins to ripen . Powdery mildew does comparatively little injury in the eastern United States, and for this reason it is doubtful if it would pay to use sulphur, excepting in localities where the vines are not being sprayed with other fungi- cides. It is believed that where Bordeaux mixture and also the ammoniacal solution are used for black rot and other diseases the pow- deiy mildew Mill cause very little injury. As to the methods of applying the fungi- cides, it may be said that much of the success of the work depends on the thoroughness with which the preparations are put on. In other words, good spraying machines are necessary. In fact the importance of this matter can not be too strongly urged. At this time a spraying outfit should be a part of the equipment of every fruit grower, or, as is no doubt frequeiith^ the case, a number of growers might combine and purchase such a machine and use it in common. It has been pointed out in various publica- tions (Farmers' Bull. No. 7, U. S. Dept. of Agr., and others) by the writer that a sprayer to be effective requires first of all a good strong force pump. Next in importance is a nozzle that will throw a mist-like spray and will not clog when thick fluids are used. There are plent}' of machines on the market filling all these requirements. For conven- ience they may be divided into three classes : (1) horse-power automatic machines; (2) machines drawn by horse power, but ope- rated by hand ; and (3) hand machines. All belonging to the first group are unnecessarily expensive and complicated, and will not do the work as thoroughly and effectively as the machines belonging to the second and third groups. Of the second group, in which the cheapest and most practical and efficient exam- ple is found in a strong, light, double-acting 58 Galloway. BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. Sprayers. double-discharge force pump, mounted on a barrel, it may be said that while they can not do the work as rapidly as the machines of the first class, they are more effective, much cheaper, and far less wasteful of the liquid used. To the third class belong the knapsack spray- ers, which are the onl}^ ones neces- sary' to notice in this connection. There is no ques- tion that for all moderately low- growing crops the knapsack sprayer fills every require- ment. In no other machine is the work so absolutel}' at all times under control, it being ; possible to place nearly every drop • of the liquid ex- actly where it i- needed. Knapsack , pumps are no^\ used in many mod- erate sized viuf yards, also ii places where th horse-power ap- • paratus, owing to the nature of the land or the manner of cultivation, can not be utilized. Many firms throughout the country (as will be seen by referring to the advertising col- umns of agricultural papers) are engaged in the manufacture and sale of the various ma- chines mentioned. For applying sulphur various devices are in use. Probal)ly the simplest is that em- ployed by the grape growers of California, i. e., a tin can holding about a gallon, pro- vided at the top with a strong, rigid handle, and having the bottom punched full of small holes. Owing to the manner in which the vines are trained, two rows can be treated at Fia Fi-r. 81.— Impkoved Vermorei, Nozzles. 80.— Knapsack Sprayer. a time by one man. A can containing sul- phur is simply held in each hand and given a slight twist over a vine in each row. This scatters the sulphur over the entire plant and the operator then passes to the next two vines. Of course this plan could not be fol- lowed in the East, owing to the wa^' in which the vines are trained. Various st3'les of sul- phuring bellows have been designed for this work, but it is lieyond the scope of this paper to enter upon a discussion of this class of apparatus. CONCLUSIONS. In conclusion, the importance of exercising care in making the treatments should again be emphasized. The work if it is worth doing at all is worth doing well ; therefore every precaution should be taken in the prepara- tion and application of the fungicides. With the exercise of judgment there is no reason why the work can not be made a success, and fine, luscious fruit grown where a few years ago such a thing was out of the question. Historical GRAPE MANUAL. Record. 59 VITICULTURAL REMARKS ABOUT MILUEAV AND ROT. The foregoing articles on the diseases of the grape and their treatment, need no further ex- planation nor commendation to our grape grow- ers. They shouid be carefully studied by every one and its lessons perseveringly practiced ; but after a few years the ills which we, old Viticul- turists, had suffered, will be almost forgotten. The following remarks may, therefore, be both interesting as a historical record of these suffer- ings,— laments of the past and hope= for the future, — and may be useful as incentives to pei"se- vere in the struggle against these diseases. In 1849 Longworth, of Cincinnati, O., wrote of his old Vine dresser, father Ammen, that he became disspirited, as the ?-o< blasted his hopes; he got sick, refused to take medicine, saying "what do I want to live for? M}^ grapes all rotten." And in a communication of Longworth to a committee on fruits, in 1848, he said : •' pre- vious to the last six or eight years we had much less of rot." Grape growing was almost aban- doned around Cincinnati, where it first flourished, and would have been deserted had its success depended on the Catawba and Isabella alone, as it did center for years on these two varieties. The introduction of others, especially the Concord, which was supposed to be entirely free from rot and mildew, gave a new impetus to grape grow- ing, and it promised again to become one of the great industries of our country, a source of wealth and enjoyment to its thousands of producers and consumers. A few years experience has unfor- tunately shown that the Concord, and in fact all our grapes, with very few exceptions, perhaps, are more or less subject to these diseases, and if some varieties were to-day )^et exempt, we could not have faith in their future freedom from these diseases, which had increased in violence, des- tructiveness and extent of territory to such a degree as to justify almost de-pondence among grape growers. In 1861 the late Dr. Engelmann, of St. Louis, gave us the first scientific description of the two species of fungi which infect our vineyards to so large an extent, — but though '' the direct des- truction of the fungus has been often attempted, and by different means, especially by sulphur sprinkling, it was without any marked effect. In 187.5 the senior of our firm, Isidor Bush, corre- sponded with the then U. S. Commissioner of Agriculture (Hon. Wm. G. Le Due) asking for the eai-nest investigation of this disease, through men skilled in microscopy and chemistry and aided by fruit-culturists ; the Commissioners prom- ised " to grapple with this question, so as to dis- cover as speedily as possible the cause of and remedy for the rot." — In the Department of Agr. Report for 1877 you can find an article by W"m. McMurtree, chemist in chief; but after studying that, you would know but little more about it than that iDOth mildew and rot are fungous diseases caused by atmospheric influences. We had to look on and wonder, powerless— knowing "That the bright hopes of to-day May be dispelled by next morn.".' but not knowing how to prevent or cure the pest. The fact that there were some places exempt from the disease, while others, — quite near by, — had almost the entire ci'op of grapes destroyed, gave rise to a number of theories, doctrines, speculations and suggestions, all of which proved delusive, based on false presumptions. Young vines planted on virgin soil, old vines, whether richly manured or growing on poor land, were attacked alike in some and uninjured in other localities, and all claims for some certain modes of training and pruning were unfounded. A paper on this subject, by Bush, lead before the American Pomological Society in September, 1879, (pp. 41-48), was followed by Bateham of Ohio, the editor of the Ohio Farmer, secretary of the Ohio Pomological Society and State Board of Agriculture, (died August 5, 1880); he said: Referring to the essay that had just been read, the results of his thirty years of observation ac- corded in the main with those of his friend, Mr. Bush. It is evident that the causes of grape rot are atrnospheric, and not any disease or debility of the vine, or defect of the soil, or error of cultiva- tion. There are in Ohio, said Mr. Bateham, an aggregate of about ten thousand acres of vine- yard, and in his opinion the crops of one- third of these on an average have been destroyed by the rot, each season for five years past, and in conse- quence of repeated failures not less than a thou- sand vines per year have been grubbed up the past five or six years. At the same time about half as many acres of new vines have been plant- ed annually on the lake shore and islands, which have escaped the disease — so that grape-growing seems likely hereafter to be confined to these favored localities. But what should the poor vintners do who live outside of these few blessed locations, exempt, we hardly knew why nor for how long? All the aid and advice we could give and have given in the previous edition (1883) of this catalogue was, to tell our grape-growers in a table, based on many years' experience, which principal varieties are generally less liable to mildew (peronosjjora); and as this table may still be of some service,* having proved correct and reliable ever since, we reprint it : TABLE OF AMERICAN VINES (PRINCIPAL VARIETIES) WITH REGARD TO THEIR RESISTANCE TO MILDEW (PeronOS- pora). I. Category: almost entirely exempt, even in unfavorable seasons and localities. uEstivalis, Northern Division: Cyuthiana, Norton's Virginia. Labncsca: Concord, Hartford, Ives, Perkins; also. Champion, Cottage, North Carolina, Hentz, Venango. Biparia and its crosses with Labr. : Elvira, Missouri Riesling, Monteflore, Noah, Tay- lor. II. Category: suffering somewhat in exception- ally unfavorable seasons and localities. ^stivalia, Southern Division: Cunningham; Northern Division: Hermann, Neosho. Labrnsca: Dracut Amber, Lady, Martha, N. Muscadine, Telegraph, Mason's Seedling. Biparia and in its crosses with Labr. : Black Pearl, Blue Dyer (Franklin), Clinton. Hybr., Labr. and Vinifera. Goethe. III. Category: suffering seriously in unfavorable seasons, and not recommendable for locali- ties usually exposed to mildew. Me ■'Quelqes Observations sur le Mildew, par G. E. issner," at the Congres International de Bordeaux. 60 Mildew BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. and Rot. uEstivalis, Southern Division: Devereux, Herbemont, Leuoir, Louisiana, Rulander. ^Sstivalis crossed with A'inifera ('f) Alvey. Labnisca: Catawba, Diana, Isabella. Riparia crosses with Labr.: Amber (Rom- mel's), Marion, rhlanfl. Hybr., Labr. and Vinifera, Labr. and Hvbr., and Vinif. with Rip.: Black Eagle, Brigh- ton, Brandt, Herbert, Liudley, Triumph, Wilder. IV. Categoky: suifering seriously even in normal seasons; entirely unreliable, except in some few favored localities, which are free from mildew. ^stivalis: Elsinburg, Eumelan. Labrusca: Adirondac, Cassady, Creveling, Isabella, lona. Mottled, Maxatawney, Union Village, Rebecca, Walter. Undetermined Class: Delawake. Hybr. of Vinif. and ZaZ»'.; Agawam, Allen's hybr., Amenia, Barry, Black Deliance, Crotou, Irving, Massasoit, Merrimack, Salem, Seuasqua. Hybr. of Vinif. and Rip.: Autuchon, Canada, Cornucopia, Othello. Varieties not sufficiently tried, and especial]^^ new varieties we would not presume to classify ; but one may safely judge of their resistance to mildew by their jiarentage. As to rot: The only variety never attacked bj' this fungus is the Delaware, which suffers, how- ever, the more from mildew. Norton's, Ives and Perkins were in some localities long considered quite exempt from rot. but were also found in others more or less subject to it. Suggestions such as planting vineyards on high open posi- tions, with perfect drainage, allowing plenty of room on the trellis, to keep soil and roots as dry as possible and secure free access of sun aud air; mulching the soil to prevent an excess of heat; and other suggestions were not very practicable, except on a small scale and seemed even then of no practical advantage in diminishing the dis- ease; sulphuring, very successfully applied in Europe against powdery mildew (Oidiuin) proved no remed}- against downy mildew (Peronospora) nor against rot; a coping, a canopy of boards or canvas, over the trellis is no protection, nor was it recommended against rot. Neither remedy nor preventive seemed possi- ble, and before these were discovered we were dismayed. The following quotations from high viticultural authorities will show the seriousness of the evil and its effect on grape culture : Alex- W. Peakson of Vineland, N. J., a man ■whose knowledge and long experience entitles his word to great weight in this matter, said : "The foliage is destroyed by the mildew and the fruit is ruined by the black rot. Grape culture may bo called a failure in this region on account of these diseases. Various remedies for these evils have been tried with but little success." Geo. W. Campbell of Delaware, Ohio — whom all veteran grape-growers know, love and honor — said in 1885: ''The great obstacles in the way of improvement of our American grapes are : Mil- dew of the foliage., rotting of the fruit and tender- ness of the vine in severe winters." Prof. T. J. Burrill of the Illinois University, stated in 1885: '* Our knowledge of the fungi, which destroy the grapes to so great an extent in this country, has not been materially increased during the few years past." Jacob Rommel of Morrison, Mo., the origin- ator of the Elvira, a plain, yet most eminent and devoted vintner, said:* ''The rot in grapes has been most fatal, and has been on the increase from year to j'ear. Concord is, in many places, for last years, a failure by rot; this and many of the old kinds, when flrst introduced, have for years proved almost exempt from rot, likewise many of our newer kinds. All appear to share the same fate in time, with the exception that some will resist it longer than others. There have been tried many remedies for preventing rot, but so far all have failed, except to cover the vines over head or to run them under eaves; this, however, is too expensive. At the same meeting a letter of ex- cuse from our junior, G. E. Meissner was read, saying: "I had no heart to make a report, which in itself could have reported but little else be- sides failure of crops." And as late as 1889, B. T. Galloway, HOi/; chief of Division of Vegetable Pathology. United States Department of Agriculture, stated: "Downey mildew and black rot prevail more or less seri- ously in all of the States east of the Rocky Moun- tains, and despite of the fact that for many years they have annually destroj^ed from one-half to three-fourths of the crop, no organized effort has until within the last three years been made to combat them." We were, naturally, somewhat discouraged, nevertheless we were persevering in the work, not without hope that some remed.v will be found ; and we expressed this hope in the third edition of this catalogue. 1883 (page 49), in the following words: '"Eminent scientists will now occupy themselves with this serious question," adding: "We have now before us an 'Essay sur le Mildion par A. milliard et, Professeur de la Faculty des Sciences a Bordeaux; Paris, 1882.' He suggests as a remed}' 'a mixture of powdered sulphate of iron, copperas (4 lbs.), with plaster of pans, gyp- sum ('20 lbs.), which according to repoi'ts was ap- plied with marked success.' " At the Missouri State Horticultural meeting, held at Warrensburg December, 1885, our G. E. Meissner, lately re- turned from a visit to Europe, said : "Happily the hope expressed two years ago by my friend and partner. Bush, seems now to have been realized," and he gave an extract of several articles just then published in the Message Agricole, at Montpcllier. France, "On the Treatment of Rot and Mildew," by Prof. Millardet, of Bordeaux. It was the same as is now^ recommended, somewhat improved, after extensive trials and tests, in Prof. Galloway's article (page 5(5 of this catalogue). Friend Meiss- ner reported at the same time (Missouri Horticul- tural Report, 1885, p. 199) another remedy, applied with remarkable success in Italy, consisting sim- ply of a lime wash, or 'lime milk," prepared in the proportion of 2}.2 kilos (about 5 I4 lbs.) of fresh lime slaked in 100 litres (■26>2 gallons) of water. With this liquid the vines were sprinkled abun- dantly, and from the middle of May until the middle of August this operation is repeated live or six times. Vines so treated, which were for- merly ravaged l\y mildew (Peronospora), were now reported exempt from it. to have conserved all their leaves and of a dark green color. Now, if it should prove equally efficacious here, the ♦Missouri State Horticultural Society, meeting at Lexington, Mo., December, 1886. Hopes and GRAPE MANUAL. Results. 61 Delaicare, very rarely subject to rot, while it is very susceptible to mildew, would be one of our most valuable and profitable grapes to grow. Thus we both said : Let us not despair of grape culture; let us hope that the remedies discovered will prove of great service as preventives against the diseases of our grape. Was our hope not well founded? Let us hear what the very eminent grape-giowers, whose la- ment we quoted, say to-day. Ah'x. W. Pearson, of Vineland, N. J., writes us (January 8, 1894). referring to his "Ironclad": (see description) '-rot-proof quality is not so im- portant now, since our discovery of success in sprcnjing, to prevent grape rot. I can hardly add any to the information on the subject, published l)y the Department of Agriculture, unless it be to approve the Bordeaux mixture, applied early and thoroughly to the vine.'' — '-The time to prevent grape rot is by the spraying of the vine before it blooms and when it is in bloom. My spraying is all done before the grapes are larger than No. 4 shot." — "With the Bordeaux thus used my success the past two years has been complete, as against grape rot, but not so good versus mildev).'''' "How- ever, full fertilization with ashes, lime and nitrate soda will enable vines to do well enough against mildew." Hermann Jaeger, of Neosho, Mo., reported to our State Horticultural Society: "More than nine- tenths of the varieties usually mentioned in the catalogues of our nurserymen had proven unprofit- able here, owing to rot or mildew, or both of these fungus diseases. Now we can grow them to perfection. Three years' spraying has secured me fine crops of about fifty varieties of grapes that I had been considering utterly worthless. Four years ago my Delaware vines were almost killed by mildew. Since then I have sprayed them regularly. They improved every season, kept their foliage till frost, and now make a finer growth of wood and produce more and better grapes than ever before. . . . Both black rot and mildew are under our control, and if we continue to have our grape crops ruined by these pests it is our own fault." George W. Campbell, as President of the Ohio State Cultural Society, said last fall (1893). in an address delivered before the students of agricul- ture: ''I can hardly close without referring to the alarming and discouraging encroachments of fun- gus diseases, which have in many places de- stroyed our grapes as well as other cultivated fruits. I feel that we owe a debt of gratitude for the labors of scientific men in our colleges and experiment stations for their careful investiga- tions and discover}' of remedies to meet and successful!}^ combat these insidious destroyers. Through the agency of their beneficent efforts we may hope to grow our grapes and other fruits still nearer perfection and also to raise successfully many of the finer varieties, which have been hitherto prevented by reason of being more sus- ceptible to the attacks of parasitic fungi." After such testimony it would be useless to add more, though we could fill many pages with them .* *And yet, we have no doubt that the ever active etTorts of man, scientists and practical viticulturists, will discover new, and perhaps, more etfective reme- dies. But we would warn against experimenting with any which may be introduced and advertised by inter- ested manufacturers only, or praised by over sanguine inventors. Hundreds of such pretended remedies have Ijeen tried and proved worthless, or at least not near as etfective and reliable as the Bordeaux mixture. It is therefore merely as a matter of latest information We will close, however, with some important re- marks by that practical and careful experimenter and observing grape-grower, Hermann Jaeger : "Nothing could have pleasei us better than the fact established after three years' experimenting with copper remedies, under the direction of our National Department of Agriculture, the fact that not only mildew, but likewise the still more fatal pest of black rot, are under our control, and can both be entirely prevented by correct spraying with Bordeaux mixture aud the other copper so- lutions. . . . Last summer it required from five to eight sprayings to keep our vines free from rot and mildew. A neighbor of ours, who postponed his spraying because the incessant rains would be sure to wash off the solution, made almost a com- plete failure, as another neighbor, who argued spraying was useless until dry weather had set in, because 'the rain would wash away all rot and mildew from the fruit.' Just such mistakes as these are to blame for all failure in spraying grape-vines, for wherever fruit and foliage are covered with a copper solution, the germination of the spores or seeds of the fungi causing rot and mildew Is impossible. But just as impossible it is for any spray to be of the least benefit if applied after this germination has taken place. Wlien by naked eye we can discover the least trace of mil- dew or rot, it proves that we should have com- menced spraying at least ten days before." The way to prepare and apply the sprays is fully and ably described in the preceding article, written for this catalogue by B. T. Galloway, the chief of the Division of Pathology of the United States Department of Agriculture — while the two small cuts, representing : ''•G-rapes tcithout and after treat- ment^'' maybe conspicuous object lessons, which everyone of our grape-growers will recognize. without recommendation that this catalogue reports the following: In an article published in the " Vigne Americaine" of June, 1894, also in the " Messager Agricole" of July, 1894, (quelques reflexions sur le traitement (hi mildew par les .se?s rfe cMiyrei, reviewing the different copper salt solu- tions which are employed ijy the French vineyardists, pi-eference is given to one' prepared hy a solution of powdered Acetate of copper (refined) called "verdet neutre." It is said to have made for itself an import- ant plHce in the vineyards of France, to the detriment of the other processes adopted in the different regions. The verdet neutre is the strongest (most toxique) of all copper salts; its destructive action on the fun- gus, which forms the liase of the disease, shows it- self rapidly. The complete solubility of the verdet neutre facilitates its penetration in the tissue of the leaves, whicli explains the rapidity of its action. The treatment with this copper salt does not only arrest the disease, but causes its prompt disappearance, by de- stroying the germs of the evil. It is harmless to the vegetable organic tissue; one has to fear no liurning or scalding of the leaves, as in some other copper prepara- tions. The manner of preparing the solution of verdet neutre is quite simple; it dissolves in cold water, by simply stirring it foi' five or six minutes witli asticlc; the tine and light powder is reduced to a very small volume, but by its nature is very powerful, because all that enters into its chemical constitution contrilmtes to the destruction of the parasite. The ease of the treatment is surprising, Ijecause of the facility of prep- aration and application of verdet neutre. If at first appearance its price seems high, one will see quickly tliat, because of the small quantity necessary, one real- izes rather a saving. On the other hand the consider- able saving in labor, the dispensing of incidental ex- penses connected witli tlie preparations in the other methods, are items which should be kept in view in cal- culating the total cost. Verdigris (or verdet neutre?) has been pretty thor- oughly tried in this country and has not proved as efficient as Bordesiux mixture. Another curative solu- tion " Vini Viiine." lately discovered in this country, 1)y Dr. L. C. Chisholm of Tennessee is confident y looked upon by him ; but he will not introduce it nor offer any for sale before it will be fully tested and reliably endorsed. 62 BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. 0 0 < GRAPE MANUAL. 63 For those who desire to grow fine grapes for table use, or for exhibition, SACKING OR THE BAG METHOD OF PROTECTING GRAPES should be mentioned. Common manilla paper bags, as used by grocers, about 6 inches wide and 9 inches deep, are put over the bunches before they are half grown, and are fastened by two pins. They should also have a small slit in the bottom, to let water run through it. The cost of bags, pins and labor is about i a cent per bag, and is well repaid by the result. Others found a better protection from insects, birds and diseases, in covering each bunch of grapes with a bag made of cheap crossbar mosquito netting. This kind of bag is slipped over the bunch and tied around the stem with a string; it interferes less with the natural coloring and perfect ripening of the fruit. In France a specially prepared net- bag is made for this purpose, which is stronger than mosquito net, keeps its shape better, and is far more durable — sufficiently open to admit air and partial sunlight, affording perfect protection against birds, and with all other advantages, which paper bags eould have, without their ob- jections. We used both and found them ex- cellent where fine grapes are appreciated. Sacking, says our friend Samuel 3IiUe)\ seems a sure prevention against rot and mildew, also against insects and birds; this is also a way to prolong the season. In paper sacks grapes will remain sound and fresh on the vines until several degrees of frost has occurred. Further: to secure the grapes from birds and insects, sacking is the only good plan; but the rot can be kept on, I be- lieve, by simply covering the bunches on top by CANOPIES. Take a piece of pretty strong paper, cut out a circle according to the size of the bunches to be covered; cut out a triangle and pin its edge lapping over the other, so that it will have the shape of an umbrella. Tie the part around the stem and pin fast. I tried this plan and found the fruit so protected, perfect, while all around the fruit left exposed rotted. J. >S'. iV^eiOTHan, Vice-President American Pomol. Society for Alabama, says : "I tested the value of paper sacks as a protection from rot. In every case (some 7,000 sacks) it was a complete protec- tion if the sacks were put on as soon as the grapes set. The sacks are also a protection against birds and insects, besides prolonging the season on some varieties two to three weeks, thus enabling us to sell for a better price." Jacob Rommell, the well-known originator of Elvira, wrote us: "My success in bagging has been gratifying; removing first or thinning out, leaving but two best clusters lemain on each shoot, having less to bag but getting larger clus- ters. I find paper bagging the best protection ; however, it must be done early in the season, say just before blooming time. I have bagged some at the right time, and such were free from rot and very fine ; while I bagged some later, after bloom- ing was over, which rotted badly in the bags. This proved that the black rot is produced in the early part of the season. There are many reportsi of failure in spraying and paper-bagging against black rot, which is undoubtedly due to not making the application early enough. If we wish to con- trol black rot it must be done early; later it has but little or no effect. The work is so easy, most any one can do it, and the expense is nominal compared to the result : the production of fine, large bunches, weighing one pound or more, with- out any defect and with a beautiful bloom ; and be- sides, the paper-bagged grapes will remain fresh, in perfect condition longer after ripe, than grapes not so protected. Such has been my experience, and it desei'ves to be put into general practice." In conclusion, let us hear and take advice of one of the best living authorities, P. J. Berckmans, of Georgia, the President of the American Pomo- logical Society, etc., who says: "Bagging grapes we have found an indispensable adjunct to suc- cessful grape-growing. This with a liberal use of various fungicides as a spray has removed many of the drawbacks heretofore existing." 64 BUSHBERG CATALOGUE. INSECTS. [Our limited space onljr permits us to briefly refer to a few of those insects which we liave found most injuri- ous in our vineyards and to some of tlie l)eneHcent in- sects which the svape-fxrower will meet with. Both are, however, for the most part unnoticed in any of our standard treatises on the jiiape-viiie, and for the facts regard ins them ^^e are indebted to Prof. C. V. Riley's valuable " Entomological Reports."! The Grape Phylloxera. (Phylloxera vastatrix). Among the insects injurious to the grape-vine none have ever attracted as much attention as the Phylloxera, which, in its essential character- istics, was unknown when the first edition of our little work on American Grape-vines was written. The gall-inhabiting type of this insect, it is true, was noticed by our grape-growers many years ago (especially on thie Clinton), but they knew nothing of its root-inhabiting type. Even Fuller — who informs us that in Mr. Grant's celebrated grape nurseries (as far back as 1858) the men were in the habit of combing out, with their fin- gers, the roots of young vines to be sent off, in ■order to get rid of the knots — never mentions anything of this, nor of any root-infesting insect, in his excellent Treatise on the Cultivation of the Native Grape, thotigh IG pages are devoted to its insects. In the spring of 1869, M. J. Lichten- stein, of Montpelier, first hazarded the opinion that the Phylloxera, which was attracting so much attention in Europe, was identical with the American Leaf-gall Louse (first described by Dr. Asa Fitch, State Entomologist of New York, by the name of Pemphigus vitifuJim;) and in 1870, Prof. C. V. Riley succeeded in establishing the Identity of their gall insect with ours, and also the identity of the gall and root-inhabiting types. The correctness of his views is confirmed by the subsequent researches of Professor Planchon, Dr. Siguoret, Balbiaui, Cornu and other scientists in France; lately also of Professor Roessler, in Klosterneuburg in Austria. After visiting France in 1871, and then extend- ing his observations here, some of which were made in our Bushberg vineyards. Professor Riley first gave us every reason to believe " that the failure of the European vine (T^. Vinifera) when planted here, and the partial failure of many hy- brids with the European Viiiifcra are mainly ow- ing to the injurious work of this insidious little root-louse; also, that some of our native varieties enjoy relative immunity from the insect's at- tacks " — M. Laliman of Bordeaux, having pre- viously noticed the remarkable resistance of certain American vines in the midst of European vines dj/ing from the effects of Phylloxera. The importance of these discoveries to grape culture cannot be too highly appreciated. The French Minister of Agriculture commissioned Professor Planchon to visit this country in order to study the insect here — the harm it does to our vines, or the power of resistance which these possess. His investigations not only corroborated Prof. Riley's conclusions regarding the Phylloxera, but gave him. and through him the people of Europe, a knowledge of the quality of our native grapes and wines, which dispelled much of the prejudice against them that had so universally prevailed heretofore. Prof. Riley's recommendations to use certain American vines, which he found to resist Phyll- oxera, as stocks on which to grow the more sus- ceptible European vine, induced us to send a few thousand plants and cuttings, gratis, for testing, to Montpellier, France, and the success of these resulted in an immense demand for the resistant varieties. With the spread of the Ph3-lloxera to other countries, including South America, Aus- tralia, South Africa, nearly every part of the world which deals in or grows European vines, the demand for these resistant stocks has contin- ued and they have been propagated to a large ex- tent almost exclusively for this purpose not only in this country but in France and elsewhere. It is characteristic of Prof. Riley that, though the first requests for such resistant stocks came to him, and though he was urged, as we know, by prominent growers to join in a business enter- prise, the possibilities of which he fully recog- nized, he declined every such offer, and has never profited financially from his discoveries, prefer- ring the honor of unselfish devotion to science to material gain. To discuss this subject as it deserves; to give a history of the grape Phylloxera — the progress and extent of its ravages — the experiments made to prevent these; to review the influence which it had and probably will have on American grape culture, would far exceed the scope of this brief manual. The literature of this subject would fill a respectable library. We can here merely men- tion a few facts, and give some figures, which may enable the grape-grower to recognize and observe this minute, j'et so important insect; and we refer those who desire full and reliable in- formation to Prof. Riley's Entomological Re- ports, from which we cull largely. It will be understood that the figures, which are from the same reports and which were made by Prof. Riley from nature, are geneallj^ very highly magnified, and that the natitral sizes are indi- cated by dots within circles, or by lines. The following figure of a grape-leaf shows the galls or excrescences produced by the gall- inhabiting type of the insect. On carefully open- ing one of the galls, we find the mother louse diligently at work surrounding herself with pale yellow eggs, scarcely (.01) the one-hundredth part of an inch long, and not quite half as thick. Under side of Leaf covered with Galls, iiat. size. She is about .04 inch long, of a dull orange color, and does not look unlike an immature seed of the common purslane. The &^g begin to hatch, when 6 or 8 days old, into active little beings. Insects. GRAPE MANUAL. Phylloxera. 65 Type Galt.icola: wliich differ from their mother ill their brighter yellow color, more perfect legs, etc. Issu- ing from the mouth of the gall, these youug Hce scatter over the vine, most of them finding their way to the tender terminal leaves, and com- mence pumping up and ap- propriating the sap, formiug eg},'; d, soctioii of galls and depositing eggs as ""till f^nla r"'Ofl ' ^ • • « i " oo swellins of tendril! ^^^^^' immediate parent had nat. size. ' done before. Tliis process continues during the summer, until the fifth or sixth generation. Eveiy egg brings forth a fertile female, which soon be- comes wonderfully prolific. By the end of Sep- tember the galls are mostly deserted, and those which are left appear as if infected with mildew, and eventually turn brown and decay. The young lice at- tach themselves to the roots, and thus hibernate It is an newly Hatched Gall-Louse: important fact that «, ventral; 6, dorsal view. the gall-inhabiting insect occurs only as an agamic and apterous female form. It is but a transient summer state, not at all essential to the perpetuation of the species, and does, compared with the other, or root-inhabiting type, but trifling damage. It flourishes mostly on the Riparia, more especially on the Clinton and Taylor; its galls have also been noticed on many other varie- ties. In some sea- ^£- y '"^