QE 755 S2 LUNDS UNIVERSITETS ARSSKRIFT. N. F. Afd. 2. Bd 6. Nr 2. KONGL. FYSIOGRAFISKA SALLSKAPETS HANDLINGAR. N. F. Bd 21. Nr 2. INDEX TO N. P. ANGELIN'S PAL^ONTOLOGIA SCANDINAVICA WITH NOTES BY A. H. WESTERGARD LUND C. W. K. GLEERUP LUNDS UNIVERSITETS ARSSKRIFT. N. F. Afd. 2. Bd 6. Nr 2. KONGL. FYSIOGRAFISKA SALLSKAPETS HANDLINGAR. N. F. Bd 21. Nr 2. INDEX TO N. P. ANGELIN'S WITH NOTES A. H. WESTERGARD it LUND 1910 FEINTED BY HAKAN OHLSSON INTRODUCTION. ANGELIN'S Palseontologia Scandinavica is of great importance for the Silurian geologist, but at the same time very little handy because of the want of an index. Owing to the lack of a uniform plan and disposition 1 of this work, an index to it is so indispensable that everybody, who has occupied himself somewhat closer with the trilobites of Sweden, must have compiled one for himself. It is in the hope of being able in some measure to facilitate the use of ANGELIN'S work that I have composed the present index. Of course a complete revision of Palseontologia Scandinavica had been most desirable, but this would have been a much too long and exacting task, which is also, no doubt, best carried out in connection with a thorough revision of our trilobite fauna in general. In expectation of such a work I have, however, thought convenient to some degree to make up for its lacking by here, under the heading » Notes », bringing together the most important of the alterations, which ANGELIN'S denominations have suffered by the publications of different authors, always referring to the works in which these alterations have been exposed. As BAREANDE has already pointed out, ANGELIN'S diagnoses, in the same man- ner as those of LINN^US, are always short, not to say incomplete, and his figures very often rather badly drawn. It has therefore seemed opportune in the »notes>, wherever it has been possible, also to refer to later works, containing a more detailed description or completer and more natural figures. 1 With regard to the arrangement of Palseontologia Scandinavica the following is to be ob- served. The description always follows the numbers of the plates and figures, which form special successive headings, whether the description of the species is given immediately after or other- where, which arrangement may well be considered to sufficiently account for the otherwise impar- donable leaving out of special explanations annexed to the plates in the original edition. The order in which the different genera are given does not seem to be determined by any general leading principle. True, ANGELIN has in the second fasc. of his work, which fasc. appeared in 1854, after the example of BAKKANDE'S first part of >Systeme silurien du centre de la Boheme», edited in 1852, brought together the genera to families, but for the rest one cannot find that any special systematical or stratigraphical order has been observed. As for the terminology adopted by ANGELIN, we may here content ourselves to mention that, where we should use the word hypostoma, he always uses the word epistoma. A. H. Westergard Like many other notable works Palseontologia Scandinavica lias its special history, the summary of which may be given here, in as much as it has influenced the form in which the work appeared. The first fasc. of the work, which is printed in quarto and written in latin, was issued in 1851 1 with pp. 1 — 24 and plates I — XXIV under the title Palseontologia Svecica. The second fasc. containing plates XXV — XLI and pp. 25—92 (or rather pp. 21—92, because the latter part of the third sheet of fasc. I was reprinted in essen- tially altered form) appeared in 1854, when the title of the work was also altered into Palseontologia Scandiuavica, for the evident reason that there are a great num- ber of species from Norway and Bornholm cited in this fasc. Furthermore pp. I —IX were added, containing an account of Silurian stratigraphy, and one page of »Addenda et Corrigenda», besides which plates XX and XXII were exchanged for new ones. In 1878 the entire work was reedited by G. LINDSTROM. In this edition there is beside the above-mentioned text and plates a short introduction, in which an account of the history of the work is given. Two new plates, I and XLII, were added and the old plates I — III were exchanged for new and essentially altered ones (I a, II and III). All these new plates, with an appendix embracing pp. 93 — 96 and containing a description of the species belonging to the genera Paradoxides, Centropleura, and Ogygiocaris, were all among the papers which ANGELIN left behind. The older rejected plates I — III, XX and XXII were also added, everyone of them, however, being marked: »Ab auctore rejecta» 2. Furthermore, in this edition every plate is followed by an explanation written by G. LINDSTROM. On the title-pages (covers) of the work is given as an under-heading: »Pars I. Icouographia Crustaceorum Formationis Transitionis», from which appears that fasc. I and II form only the first part of the projected work. In 1855 ANGELIN got a public subvention for editing fasc. Ill 3. This, however, never appeared, but several of the plates intended for this fasc. were printed. Two of these, plates A and B with reproductions exclusively of Crustacea, have probably been appended to privately distributed copies of Palasontologia Scandinavica. Other plates are to be found among the papers which ANGELIN left behind and which are now in the Swedish State Museum (Natural History) of Stockholm. As some of these plates, spread in some way or other, are mentioned and cited in the literature, it seems to be appropriate here also to devote a few words to these » supplements » to Palseoutologia Scandinavica not published in the ordinary way. 1 In the *Prcemonenda» of LINDSTROM'S edition (1878) the first fasc. of Palseontologia Scandina- vica is stated to have appeared in 1852, which statement the cover of the original edition, however, proves to be false. 2 For the sake of completeness I have also into the following index paid regard to these older plates and to the descriptions given on pages 21 — 24 of the first fasc., marking the plates and pages in question I1, II11 . . . and 211, 221 etc. 8 S. LOV£N : N. P. Angelin. — Lefnadsteckn. ofver K. sv. Vet. Akad:s ledamoter. Bd. 2, p. 135 Index to N. P. Angelin's Paleeontologia Scandinavica, with notes 5 Plate A *, containing 36 numbers most of them with several figures, all of which represent Ostracoda (and according to the present view possibly also Phyllo- carida), is mentioned in several passages by BARRANDE in his Systeme silurien etc. Suppl. au Vol. I. — On p. 485 BARRANDE gives the name Beyrichia Angelini to figure 36 of plate A, and on p. 519 we are told that Leperditia baltica His. and L. primordialis (described in 1869 by LINNARSSON) are reproduced on the same plate. According to MOBERG and GRONWALL 2, the figures 16 and 17 represent Klwdenia Kiesowi KRAUSE. As for plate B, which has 6 reproductions of Merostomata and Phyllocarida, BARRANDE mentions (1. c. p. 438) that this plate represents fragments of Ceratiocaris, originating from Gotland, of which one with 7 or 8 free segments 3. GRONWALL * speaks of a table XLIII, on which Paradoxides- Davidis SALTER is reproduced under the name » Paradoxides Pingelii BECK M. S.» Moreover at this place it is to be pointed out, that before ANGELIN set to work writing Palseontologia Scandinavica, he had already brought together and sold col- lections of Swedish fossils, several of which he had himself named. A list of these collections, embracing five decades, was printed under the title »N. P. Angelini Museum palseontologicum suecicum. Sectio prima. Petrefacta formationis s. d. trans- itionis superioris, centuria l:ma» as an off-print from Naturhistorisk Tidskrift udg. af H. KROYER, Bd 2, Kobenhavn 1838 — 1839. When ANGELIN in Palseontologia Scaudinavica cites one of these new species, viz. Cyphaspis (Prcetus, Goniopleura) elegantula, he puts »nob.» after the name and not, as is usually the case when he is speaking of previously undescribed species, »n. sp.» The great importance that must be attached to ANGELIN'S Palseontologia Scan- dinavica does not, however, consist only in the considerable number of new trilobite species, which are described and reproduced in it, but also and perhaps not least in his stratigraphical scheme for the Silurian of Sweden, which was given in the introduction of the second fasc. of the work. As this scheme, in which the Silurian of Sweden are divided in 8 vertical »regiones», has been of fundamental importance for the exact establishment of the sequence of the Swedish Silurian, it will seem justified here to call attention to some of its details which are illustrat- ive of the genesis of the scheme. After giving three profiles taken from the Vestro- 1 To judge from BAKBANDE'S statements (Systeme silurien etc. Suppl. au Vol. I, pp. 485 and 520) it will seem that tab. A exists in two somewhat different editions, of which one has been appended to copies of fasc. II, distributed in 1854, the other >avec diverses modifications dans les figures* has been distributed in 1860, >dans la Bme livraison de cet ouvrage* (Pal. Scand.). That the text of fasc. II has in some slight degree been altered is evident from the fact that at least the pages III — IV, as well as the leaf containing Addenda et Corrigenda, and the pages 25 — 28 and 65—66 exist in two somewhat different editions. By citing the rejected pages, I always mark them e. g. 261, 651 a. s. o. 2 Om Fyledalens Gotlandium, Lunds Univ:s Arsskrift. N. F. Afd. 2, Bd. 5, p. 66. 8 BARKANDE'S already mentioned statements as to plates A and B are also indicated in VOGDES- A classed and annotated Bibliography of ths palaeozoic Crustacea 1698—1892. — Occasional papers of the Californian Academy of Science. IV. San Francisco 1893, p. 7. 4 Bornholms Paradoxideslag. — Danm. geolog. Unders. II Rsekke. N:o 13, p. 107, note. 6 A. H. Westergard gothian mountains (Kinnekulle, Mosseberg and Hunneberg) and mentioning that to these regions two more must be added, of which one, Regio Cryptonymorum, builds up Gotland and the other, Regio Conocorypharum, was up to that time only met with in Skane and on the island of Bornholm, ANGELIN sets forth his complete scheme in the following manner. Regio VIII. Crj'ptonymorum (Encrinurorum) = E. VII. Harparum = DE. VI. Trinucleorum = D. V. Asaphorum = C. IV. Ceratopygarum = BC. III. Conocorypharum = B. II. Olenorum = A. I. Fucoidarum . That the succession of strata given in this scheme is not quite correct was shown already by LINNAKSSON in 1868 l. In the scheme Regio Conocorypharum, or as it is now called the Paradoxides beds, (which ANGELIN knew only from Skane, and whose place in the sequence - - for the rest taken from the Vestrogothian moun- tains - - he accordingly has not had the chance to observe directly) has been wrongly inserted above instead of below Regio Olenorum. It is to be observed, however, that from the statements given in Faheontologia Scandinavica of the distribution of the species in different regions, it plainly appears that ANGELIN'S Regio Conocorypharum does not comprise the whole of the Paradoxides beds but only the zone of P. Forchhammeri or the »Andrarum limestone*. On the other hand, the zone of P. Tessini, which was, besides the above-mentioned one, the only zone of Paradoxides beds known at that time, was classed with the Regio Olenorum. As will appear from the above scheme, ANGELIN marked his regions not only with numbers but also with letters, the latter notation, however, only for the fossili- ferous regions II— VIII. From Regio Fucoidarum no fossils were yet known. From the letters it also appears that Regio Harparum and Regio Ceratopygarum, marked DE and BC (or, as ANGELIN also writes it, D— E and B — C) respectively, have afterwards been inserted in an older scheme comprising only five regions A, B, (7, D and E, which scheme was completed with the regions BC and DE only after the first fasc. had been published. That this has been the case is confirmed especially by the circumstance that ANGELIN in fasc. I does not mention a single species belonging to regio BC and, above all, by the fact that the two species Phacops mucronafa BBONGN. and Phacops eucentra ANG. belonging to Regio Harparum, which are described in the same fasc., are here mentioned as belonging to Regio E, Bidrag till Vestergotlands Geologi. — Ofvers. af Kgl. sv. Vet.-Ak. Forhandl. Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes 1 which has been corrected into DE but only in the »Addenda et Corrigenda* appended to the second fasc. Moreover, it ought to be pointed out, that within Regio D ANGBLIN distinguished two sections, a lower one Da, nowadays called the Chasmops beds, and an upper one Db, which has kept the name Trinucleus shales. At last it ought perhaps also to be remarked here, that BABBANDE'S work »Parallele entre les depdts siluriens de Boheme et de Scandinavie», Prague 1856, which was written after a personal interview between BABBANDE and ANGELIN during the two month's journey which the latter undertook in Bohemia for the purpose of studying BABRANDE'S collections and the Silurian of Bohemia, contains a great many statements of such a nature that the work in question may well be said to a certain degree to contain supplements of Palseontologia Scaudinavica. As has been already pointed out, even BABBANDE'S »Systeme silurien du centre de la Boheme: Supplement au Vol. I» contains a good deal of information about ANGELIN'S work in question. Bibliography. The following works are cited in the notes of the Index only by mentioning the author's name and the year the work was published. ANDERSSON, J. G. 1893. Ueber Blocke aus dem jiingeren Untersilur auf der Insel Oland vorkommend. - Ofvers. af Kgl. Vet.-Ak:s Forhandl. 1893. N:o 8. BARRANDE, J. 1852. Systeme silurien du centre de la Boheuie. I6re Partie. Vol. I. 1856. Parallele entre les depOts siluriens de Scheme et de Scandinavie. — Abhandl. der kgl. bOhm. Ges. der Wiss. Folge 5. Bd 9. 1872. Systeme silurien du centre de la Boheme. Supplement au Vol. I. BEYRICH, E. 1845. Ueber einige bohmische Trilobiten. — Berlin. 4:o. 1846. Untersuchungen fiber Trilobiten. Zweites Stuck. Als Fortsetzung zu der Abhandlung » Ueber einige bo'hmische Trilobiten ». — Berlin. 4:o. BROGGER, W. C. 1878. Om paradoxidesskifrene ved Krekling. — Nyt Mag. for Naturv. Bd 24, H. 1. 1882. Die silurischen Etagen 2 und 3 im Kristianiagebiet und auf Eker. — Universitats- programm fur 2. Sem. 1882. Kristiania. 1886. Ueber die Ausbildung des Hypostomes bei einigen skandinavischen Asaphiden. - Sver. Geol. Unders. Ser. C. N:o 82. 1896. tiber die Verbreitung der Euloma-Niobe-Fauna (der Ceratopygenkalkfauna) in Europa. — Nyt Mag. for Naturv. Bd 35. GR&NWALL, K. A. 1902. Bornholms Paradoxideslag og deres Fauna. - • Danmarks geologiske UndersOgelse. II. Rsekke. N:o 13. HOLM, G. 1883. De svenska arterna af trilobitslagtet lllsemis (DALMAN). — Bih. till Kgl. Vet.-Akad. Handl. Bd 7. N:o 3. 1897. Palaeontologiska notiser. 4. Om Bohemilla(?) denticulata LINRS. och Remopleurides microphthalmus LiNRS. — Geol. Fo'ren. i Stockholm Fo'rhandl. Bd 19. H. 6. HOLTEDAHL, O. 1910. Uber einige norwegischen Oleniden. — Norsk Geol. Tidsskrift. Bd 2. N:o 2. KJERULF, TH. 1865. Veiviser ved geologiske Excursioner i Christiania Omegn. — Universitetsprogram. Christiania 1865. 4:o. Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes LAKE, PH. 1906 — 08. A monograph of the British cambrian trilobites. — Palseontogr. Soc. London. 4:o. LlNDSTROM, G. 1885. Forteckning pa Gotlands Siluriska Crustaceer. — Ofvers. af Kongl. Vet.-Ak. Forhandl. 1885. N:o 6. 1888. List of the fossil faunas of Sweden. I, II. Stockholm. 8:0. 1901. Researches on the visual organs of the trilobites. — Kongl. Sv. Vet.-Ak. Handl. Bd 34. N:o 8. LlNNARSSON, J. G. O. 1869. Om Vestergotlands cambriska och siluriska aflagringar. — Kongl. Sv. Vet.-Akad. Handl. Bd 8. N:o 2. 1871. Jemforelse mellan de Siluriska aflagringarna i Dalarne och i Vestergotland. — Ofvers. af Kongl. Vet.-Akda:s FOrhandl. 1871. N:o 3. 1873. Trilobiter fran VestergStlands »Andrarumskalk». — Geol. Foren. i Stockholm Forhandl. Bd 1. N:o 18. 1875. Tva nya Trilobiter fran Skanes alunskiffer. — Geol. Foren. i Stockholm Forhandl. Bd 2. 1877. Om faunan i lagren med Paradoxides 6'landicus. — Geol. Fo"ren. i Stockholm Forhandl. Bd. 3. 1879. Om faunan i kalken ined Conocoryphe exsulans. — Sver. Geol. Unders. Ser. C. N:o 35. 1880. Om fOrsteningarna i de svenska lagren med Peltura och Sphgerophthalmus. — Sver. Geol. Unders. Ser. C. N:o 43. 1882. De undre paradoxideslagren vid Andrarum. — Sver. Geolog. Unders. Ser. O. N:o 54. MOBERG, J. C. 1902. Bidrag till kannedomen om trilobiternas byggnad. — Geol. Foren. i Stockholm FOr- handl. Bd 24. 1907. JEglina umbonata ANGELIN sp. — Geol. FOren. i Stockholm FOrhandl. Bd 29. MOBERG, J. C. och GRONWALL, K. A. 1909. Om Fyledalens gotlandium. — Lunds Univ:s Arsskrift. N. F. Afd. 2. Bd 5. MOBERG, J. C. och MOLLER, HJ. 1898. Cm Acerocarezonen. — Geol. Foren. i Stockholm FGrhandl. Bd 20. MOBERG, J. C. och SEGERBERG, C. O. 1906. Bidrag till kannedomen om ceratopygeregionen med sarskild hansyn till dess utveck- ling i Fogelsangstrakten. — Lunds Univ:s Arsskrift. N. F. Afd. 2. Bd 2. NATHORST, A. G. 1907. Carl von Linn6 sasom geolog. — Skildringar utgifna af Kungl. Vetenskapsakademien i anledning af tvahundraarsdagen af Linnes fOdelse. — Uppsala. 8:0. OLIN, E. 1906. Om "de chasmopskalken och trinucleusskiffern motsvarande bildningarne i Sk&ne. - Lunds Univ:s Arsskrift. N. F. Afd. 2. Bd 2. PERSSON, E. 1904. Bidrag till kannedomen om oleniderna i »zonen med Eurycare och Leptoplastus* vid Andrarum. I. — Geol. Fflren. i Stockholm. FOrhandl. Bd 26. H. 7. POMPECKJ, J. F. 1896. Die Fauna des Cambrium von Tejfovic und Skrej in BOhmen. — Jahrb. der k. k. geolog. Reichsanst. 1895. Bd 45. H. 2 und 3. RAVN, J. P. J. 1899. Trilobitfaunaen i den bornholmske Trinucleusskifer. — Damn. geol. Unders. Rpekke 2. N:o 10. REMELE, A. 1883. Untersuchungen fiber die versteinerungsfiihrenden Diluvialgeschiebe des norddeutschen Flachlandes. I. Sttick. — Berlin 1883. 4:o. Lunds Univ:s Arsskrift. N. F. Afd. 2. Bd 6. 2 10 A. H. Westergard SCHMIDT, FR. 1881 — 1907. Revision der ostbaltischen silurischen Trilobiten. — Mem. de 1'Acad. imp. des sciences de St-Petersbourg. STEINHARDT, E. TH. Q. 1874. Die bis jetzt in preuss. Geschieben gefundenen Trilobiten. — Beitr. zur Naturk. Preus- sens herausg. von der Phys.-Oekon. Ges. zu Konigsberg. 3. 1874. TULLBERG, S. A. 1880. Om Agnostus-arterna i de kambriska aflagringarna vid Andrarum. - - Sver. Geol. Unders. Ser. C. N:o 42. 1882. FOrelOpande redogOrelse for geologiska resor pa Oland. — Geol. Foren. i Stockholm FOrhandl. Bd 6. H. 6. TORNQUIST, S. L. 1884. Undersokningar ofver Siljanaomradets trilobitfauna. — Sver. Geolog. Unders. Ser. C. N:o 66. WALLERIUS, I. D. 1895. UndersOkningar Ofver zonen med Agnostus Isevigatus i Vestergotland. — Lund. 8:0. WIMAN, C. 1904. lakttagelser p& Nileus .armadillo DALM. — Geol. FOren. i Stockholm FOrhandl. Bd 26. 1905. Ein Shumardiaschiefer bei Lanna in Nerike. — Arkiv fOr zoologi. Bd 2. N:o 11. 1906. Palseontologische Notizen 7—12. — Bull, of the Geol. Instit. of Upsala. Vol. VII. 1907: 1. tiber die Fauna des westbaltischen Lepttenakalks. — Arkiv f6r zoologi. Bd 3. N:o 24. 1907: 2. Studien uber das Nordbaltische Silurgebiet, II. — Bull, of the Geol. Instit. of Qp- sala. Vol. VIII. INDEX Abbreviations. Dal. =Dalarne. Ol. = Oland. Gotl. = Gotland. 8k. = Skane. Ner. = Nerike. Smal. = Smaland. Og. = Ostergotland. Vg. = Vestergotland. It is also to be remarked that in the Index, excepting the notes, names in roman letters are those used by ANGELIN, and still to be upheld, > > brevier are to be rejected, and > > italics are corrected, not used (in this way) by ANGELIN. 12 A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities Acerocare ANG. 46 Acerocare ecorne ANG. 46 XXV 10 A 8k.: Sandby Acidaspis MUBOH. Acidaspis ? armata BOECK » Barrandei ANG. 33 38 38 XXII XXII 15 14 E? E Norway. Gotl Acidaspis bicuspis ANG. sp. » breviloba ANG. sp. Acidaspis centrina DALM. » crenata EMHR. 34 XXI 6 E Gotl Acidaspis decacantha ANG. sp. Acidaspis granulata WAHL. » Marklini ANG. 37 38 XXII XXII 11 13 DE E Vg.: Alleberg, Mosseberg ... Gotl » multicuspis ANQ. 37 XXII 12 E Gotl » pectinata ANG. Acontheus ANG. 33 5 XXI 5 E Gotl Acrocephalites WALLEEIUS Aeglina BARE. Aeglina? oblongula ANG. 42 42 XXIV 5 D Vg.: Bestorp Aeglina umbonata ANG. sp. Agacantus ANG. TV1 Agnostus BRONGN. Agnostus aculeatus ANG. 5 8 VI 12 B Sic.: Andrarum :. . » bituberculatus ANG. 6 VI 2 B Sk.: Andrarum » brevifrons ANG. 6 VI 4 B Sk.: Andrarum » exsculptus ANG. 7 VI 8 B $&.: Andrarum * » glabratus ANG. 6 VI 6 C Va.: Bestoro.. Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes 13 Notes The name Cyclognathus, a synonyme of Acerocare and proposed by LINNAESSON 1875, p. 500, ought to be dropped; compare MOBEKG and MOLLEB 1898, p. 230. Compare MOBEEG and MOLLEE 1898, p. 231. Not identical with A. Barrandei FLETCHEE et SALTEE. Compare LINDSTEOM 1885, p. 53. See Trapelocera bicuspis. See Trapelocera? breviloba. See A. granulata. As to the hypostoma compare LINDSTBOM 1901, pi. 1, fig. 3. See Cyrtometopus? decacanthus. According to LINNARSSON (1869, p. 65) identical with A. centrina. Compare LINDSTEOM 1885, p. 54. See also the following species. According to LINDSTEOM 1885, p. 54, identical with A. Marklini. See Aneuacanthus. — In an abstract of Palseontologia Svecica in Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie etc, 1852, p. 242, was remarked that two genera Eryx and Aconthius previously existed among the serpents. Surely for this reason ANGELIN in his >Addenda et Corrigenda* amended Eryx to Elyx and Aconthias to Aneucanthus (by BAREANDE 1856, p. 20, corrected to Aneuacanthus). See under Solenopleura. By misprint recorded from regio E instead of regio D. Compare LINNAESSON 1869, p. 83, foot-note 2. See Corynexochus? umbonatus. By ANGELIN himself, p. IV, changed into Aneucanthus. See this. Compare TTJLLBEEG 1880, p. 23. According to TULLBEEG 1880, p. 28, a mistake must have been made by ANGELIN in the reproduction of the two species A. glandiformis and A. bituberculatus (plate VI, figs 1, 2): the head of ANGELIN'S fig. 1 and the tail of his fig. 2 belong to A. bituberculatus, the head of fig 2 and the tail of fig. 1 to A. glandiformis. - - In the same paper TULLBEEG states that the specimen from Krekling in Norway described by BEOGGEB 1878, p. 75, under the name A. bituberculatus is not identical with this species but with A. cfr loevigatus DALM. Compare TULLBEEG 1880, p. 35. TULLBEEG, who examined the specimens on which ANGELIN based this species, stated (1880, p. 22) that the tail of the figured specimen is in reality the head of another species, described by BBOGGEE 1878, p. 68, under the name A. Nathorsti. Only the head is known. — Compare also WALLEEIUS 1895, p. 37, and GEONWALL 1902, p. 53. ANGELIN records this species from regio D which probably ought to be C. Compare TOENQUIST 1884, p. 90, and WIMAN 1905, p. 12. 14 A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Eegio Localities Agnostus glandiform is ANG 5 VI 1 B Sk.: Andrarum Isevigatus DALM. 6 VI 3 A Vg.: Honsater, Gudhern, Kaflas etc > lentiformis ANG. 7 VI 6 0 Sk.: Fogelsang » pisiform is L. 7 VI 7 A All Sweden » planicauda ANG. 7 VI 9 B Sk.: Andrarum punctuosus ANG. reticulatus ANG. 8 8 VI VI 11 10 A Sk.: Andrarum (boulders) ... Sk.: Andrarum Agraulos CORDA Amphion PAND. 30 Amphitryo VI „ t 19 Ampyx DALM. 80 Atnpyx? aculeatus ANG. A f 81 20 XL XVII 5 3 Da Norway: Gaso. Vg.: Kinnekulle (boulders). car-mains ANG. 82 XL 12 » costatus BOECK Ampyx crassirostris ANG. sp. 80 XL 1 Da Vg.: Kinnekulle; Norway: Christiania. » culminatus ANG. sp. » doinatus ANG. sp. Ampyx foveolatus ANG. Ampyx jugatus ANG. sp. 80 XL 2 DE Dal.: Osmundsberg. Ampyx mammillatus SARS 80 XL 3 Da? Norway: Christiania i •/ » nasutus DALM. » Portlocki BARK. 19 81 XVII XL 1 4 C C i 6g.: Husbyfjol, Heda etc.; 01.: < Boda etc.; Sk.: Fogelsang; Norway: LadegaardsOen. Ampyx rostratus SARS scanicus ANG. sp. » setirostris ANG. sp. Ampyx tetragonus ANG. 20 XVII 2 D Vg.: Bestorp Ampyx tumidus ANG. sp Aneuacanthus (Aneucanthus) ANG. 5 Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavian, with notes 15 Notes Compare TULLBERG 1880, p. 29. See also the above note to A, Htuberculatus. IANGKUN'S fig. is incorrect, composed of two tails. Compare TULLBERG 1880, p. 27, and WALLERIUS 1895, p. 35. — Occurs mainly in the upper zones of the Paradoxides beds. Compare WIMAN 1905, p. 13. ANGELIN'S fig. don't show the ordinary appearence of this species. Compare TULLBERG 1880, p. 25. Compare TULLBERG 1880, p. 33. Occurs at Andrarum in the two upper zones of the Paradoxides Tessini beds. — Compare TULLBER- 1880, p. 17. Compare TULLBERG 1880, p. 23. See Arionellus. — POMPECKJ 1896, p. 548, and GRONWALL 1902, p. 158, employ this generic name instead of Arionellus. BARRANDE 1852, p. 404, substituted the name Arionellus for Agraulos because a rather similar name, Agraulis, was already used for a genus of Lepidopters. See Pliomera. (Probably = Amphitryon [HAWLE et CORDA], a synonyme of Remoplewides PORTLOCK (BARRANDE 1852 t p. 41). iThis genus also includes the two genera Lonchodomas ANG. and Raphiophorus ANG. [On p. 82 ANGELIN writes Lonchodomas carinatus. See Lonchodomas crassirostris. See Raphiophorus culminatus. See Lonchodomas domains. See Lonchodomas jugatus. See Ampyx te.tr agonus and Raphiophorus depressus. See Lonchodomas rostratus. See Raphiophorus scanicus, See Raphiophorus setirostris. According to TORNQUIST 1884, p. 88, identical with A. Portlocki. See Raphiophorus tumidus. See the note to Acontheus. 16 A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities Aneuacanthus acutan- J caput gulus ANG. 1 pygidium Anomocare ANG. 5 63 24 V XXXIII 4,5 19 JB Sk.: Andrarum. Anomocare aculeatutn ANG. 26 XVIII 6 B Sk.: Andrarum » acuininatum ANG. 26 XVIII 7 B Sk.: Andrarum difforme ANG. Anomocare excavatum ANG. » Iseve ANG. 25 25 25 XVIII XVIII XVIII f 5) J (not 1 | the | I tail)] 3 1 B B B 8k.: Andrarum ; Bornholm . . . 8k.: Andrarum; Bornholm... Sk.: Audrarum » limbatura ANG. 25 XVIII 2 B Sk.: Andrarum Anomocare microphthalmum ANG. 25 XVIII 4 B Sk.: Andrarum Anopocare ANG 50 Anopocare pusillum ANG. 50 XXVII 1, V A Sk.: Andrarum Apatocephalus BROGGER Apatocephalus serratus S et B. sp. Arionellus BARB. Arionellus aculeatus ANG. sp. » acuminatus ANG. » difforrnis ANG. Arraphus ANG. 86 Arraphus corniculatus ANG. 86 XLI 6 DE Vg.: Alleberg Asaphus BRONGN. emend. ANG. Asaphus acuminatus BOECK 51 53 XXIX 2 C \Sk.: Fogelsang; Norway: \ Christiania » expansus L. 52 XXVIII 1-1 b C i 6g.: Husbyfjol; Norway: Christiania » fallax DALM. 53 XXVIII 3-3 c, c 6q.: Husbyfjol Asaphus ingens BARB. 3e Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes 17 Notes To this genus ANGELIN also referred species belonging to Arionellus and Liostracus. Compare BARRANDK 1856, p. 20. By BARRANDE 1856, p. 20, referred to the genus Arionellus BARE. See also the note to the following species. By BARRANDE, 1. c., referred to Arionellus. — LINNARSSON 1»73, p. 3, remarked that the tail by ANGELIN referred to this species belongs to Liostracus microphthalmus. — On p. 221 ANGELIN ranged A. aculeatus and A. acuminatus only as varieties of A. difformis (there called Proetusf difformis). This earlier statement of ANGELIN was maintained by BROGGER 1878, p. 58, and GRONWALL 1902, p. 161.- LINDSTROM 1888, p. 4, however, mentioned the forms in question as three distinct species. — Compare BROGGER, 1. c., and GRONWALL, 1. c. On page 221 ANGELIN writes Proetusf excavatus. Compare GRONWALL 1902, p. 140. » » 211 > » Proetus Icevis. » » » p. 141. » » 221 > » Proetus? limbatus. > > » p. 140. » » 221 > » Proetus? microphthalmus. By LINNARSSON 1873, p. 244, referred to the genus Liostracus. See also the note to Anomocare difforme. This genus has to be dropped; see the following note. According to LINNARSSON 1880, p. 137 and 140, this species was based on the head of Sphcerophthalmus alatus and the tail of Peltura scarabceoides. (See Centropleura serrata and C. angusticauda. See the note to Agraulos. (See Anomocare. This name was given to an isolated glabella of a Harpes, which had lost its margin, and consequently the name has to be dropped; compare BARRANDE 1856, p. 23. Belongs to the genus Harpes; see the preceding note. 'According to SCHMIDT 1901, p. 33, this form may be regarded as a variety of A. raniceps. I According to the text the number 1 e of the plate must be misprinted for 3 e. — Compare SCHMIDT 1901, p. 24. See also A. fallax. — As to the hypostoma compare BROGGER 1886, pi. I, fig. 2. According to SCHMIDT, 1. c., identical with A. expansus. See also the preceding note. See Niobe lata. Identical with this species is A. Trinucleorum BROGGER 1886, p. 35. Compare OLIN 1906, p. 62. Lands Univ:s Arsskrift. N. F. Afd. 2. Bd 6. 3 18 A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plato Fig. Regio Localities Asaphus Isevigatus ANG. » platyurus ANG. 53 54 XXIX XXX 1 1 D C Vg : Bestorp. 01; Vg.: Kiunekulle » raiiiceps (DALM.) BOECK 53 XXVIII 2 C Og.: Husbyfjol, Heda, Ljung; Dal.: Fjeckakvarn. Alsar- by etc. . » rimulosus ANG. 52 XXVII 7 C Og.: Husbyfjol etc Astyages ANG. VTT DE Aulacopleura ANG. Aulacopleura brachymetopa ANG. * canaliculata ANG 261 271 271 » holometopa ANG. > ? stenometopa ANG. Brachypleura ANG. 261 281 13 Brachypleura 4-lineata ANG. 13 IX 8 0 Vg.: Bestorp » 6-lineata ANG. 13 IX 7 Vg.: Kinnekulle (boulders) Bronteus GOLD p. Bronteus laticauda WAHL. 56 57 XXXIII 1 a, 2 DE Dal ? nudus ANG. » Marklini ANG. 90 90 XLI XLI 19,20 18 DE E Dal. Gotl » platyactin ANG. 57 XXXIII 3 E Gotl » polyactin ANG. 57 XXXIII 4 E Gotl L i/ Buraastus MURCH. 40 Burnastus barriensis MUECH. » ? glomerinus DALM. 63 xxxiii 17 C? 6q.? . » Lindstromi ANG. 40 XXIV 1 E Gotl Calymmene BRONGN. 221 \- Calymmene brachymetopa ANG. » canaliculata ANG. 28 231 231 1 1 » holometopa ANG. » stenoraetopa ANG. » aculeata ANG. 231 241 231 1 i XIX 2 A 01 : Borgholiu 27 Index to N. P. Angelin's Palaeontologia Scandinavica, with notes 19 Notes Compare TORNQUIST 1884, p. 57, and SCHMIDT 1901, p. 55. [Compare SCHMIDT 1901, p. 82. See also A. acuminatus. SCHMIDT 1904, p. 6, was inclined to refer this species to Pseudasaphus globifrons EICHW. sp. • This generic name, preoccupied for a lepidopter, was by ANGELIN himself replaced by the term Isocolus; \ compare BARRANDE 1856, p. 23. ANGELIN himself later changed Aulacopleura into Solenopleura. See this. I ANGELIN originally wrote Remopleurides but in his » Addenda et Corrigenda* amended this name to Brachy- pleuru. Later authors, however, employ the former name. Compare BAREANDE 1856, p. 21. According to LINNARSSON 1869, p. 67, identical with Remopleurides radians BARR. = Remopleurides 6-lineatus. Compare LINNARSSON 1869, p. 69. LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 2, fig. 10, gives a better copy of the hypostoma. Compare SCHMIDT 1894, p. 38. iCompare LINDSTROM 1885, p. 86 and 87. As to the hypostoma of Br. platyactin compare LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 2, fig. 15. A subgenus of Illcenus. See the following two species. HOLM 1883, p. 126, stated that this species is a real Bumastus, possibly identical with B. barriensis. The specimen on which B.f glomerinus was based originates from Gotland and not from OstergOtland. Compare HOLM, 1. c. According to HOLM 1883, p. 124, identical with B. barriensis. — As to the hypostoma compare LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 2, fig. 81. In the first fasc. ANGELIN wrote Calymene. See the notes to the genus Solenopleura ANG. and its species. On p. 27 by ANGELIN himself amended to Liostracus aculeatus. 20 A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities Calyrnmene lejostraca ANG. 241 1 XIX 3 A 01 Calymmene spectabilis ANG. (27) 28 XIX 5 E Gotl > tuberculata BRUNN. 29 XIX 5a E Gotl.; Norway: Langoen, Malmoen Calynimeue tuberculosa DALM. XIX 5d E Gotl Celrous ANG 23 Celmus granulatus ANG. 24 XVII 8 0 Og. : Skarpasen Centropleura ANG 87 Centropleura angusticauda ANG. 88 XLI 10* BC Vg.: Hunneberg ? dicrseura ANG. 88 XLI 9 BC Norway : Oslo Centropleura Loveni ANG. 2 87 IIP ) f 1-3 l,la B 1 . } Sk.: Audrarum Centropleura serrata S. et B. 95 88 I m 1 XLI 4 a, 4b 10 [B BC Norway : Oslo Centropleura Steenstrupi ANG. 95 III | Ib, Ic \ B Bornholm CeratoDvee COEDA ? IV 1 3, 5 1 B r^*/ o Chasmops M'Coy Chirurus BEYB. 31 Chirurus couformis ANG. 32 79 XXI XXXIX 3 15(a) E Gotl.: Bursvik, Hoburg etc.. 90 XLI xt-'V€v 15* ::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::} Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes 21 Note On p. 27 by ANGELIN himself amended to Liostracus muticus; by LINNARSSON 1877, p. 364, stated to belong to the genus Ellipsocephalus . Compare LINDSTROM 1885, p. 66, and 1907, p. 55. A synonyme is C. Blumenbachi BRONGN. — ANGELIN'S figs 5 b—5 d don't belong to this species. Compare LINDSTROM 1885, p. 63. — As to the hypostoma compare LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 3, fig. 8. Not identical with C. tuberculosa SALTER. Compare LINDSTROM 1885, p. 66. BARRANDE 1856, p. 23, brought the genus together with Proetus. SCHMIDT 1907, p. 16, proposed to exchange Celmns for Crotalurus VOLB. which name, however, is younger. According to SCHMIDT 1907, p. 15, Crotalurus Barrandei VOLB. is synonymous with Celmus granulatus. To the genus Centropleura, with C. Loveni as genotype, ANGKLIN also referred G. angusticauda, C.? dicrceura, C. serrata and C. Steenstrupi (described in the Appendix). BARRANDE 1856, p. 19, em- phasized that C. Loveni and C. Steenstrupi ought to be , brought together with Paradoxides, a view then shared by ANGELIN, who, nevertheless, in his left papers, published in the Appendix, maintained the name Centropleura for the two species in question. Later Swedish authors rejected this name or considered the genus Centropleura at most as a subgenus of Paradoxides. G RON WALL 1902, p. 122, however, rightly looked upon Centropleura as a distinct genus. — As to the other three species, by ANGELIN referred to G., and for which BARRANDE, 1. c., proposed provisionally to employ ANGELIN'S generic name, LINNARSSON 1869, p. 71, stated that they belong to another family Dicellocephalidce. According to BROGGER 1896, p. 21, probably a variety of Apatocephalus serratus. — (The asterisk belonging to the number is wanting in the letterpress). On this species as genotype, BROGGER 1896, p. 16, based a new genus Dicellocephalina. — Compare MOBERG and SEGERBERG 1906, p. 90. ANGELIN originally (p. 2) referred this species to Paradoxides. See the note to Centropleura. — Compare GRONWALL 1902, p. 124. BROGGER 1896, p. 21, took this species as type of the new genus Apafocephalus. — The head was first described by LINNARSSON 1869, p. 69, under the name Remopleurides dubius. — Compare HOLM 1897, p. 465; see also MOBERG and SEGERBERG 1906, p. 88. Compare GRONWALL 1902, p. 125. According to BARRANDE 1856, p. 21, ANGELIN later believed this statement to be incorrect and the genus Ceratopyge to appear first in regio BC. TULLBERG (Skanes graptoliter I. — Sver. Geolog. Unders. Ser. C. N:o 50, p. 23), however, mentioned Ceratopyge sp. from the Olenus beds and WALLERIUS (1895, p. 56) Proceratopyge (Ceratopyge) conifrons WALL, from the uppermost Paradoxides beds. A subgenus of Phacops; see this. != Chirurus s. s. — SCHMIDT 1881, p. 125, divided the genus Chirurus BEYR. into the 5 subgenera: Chirurus s. s. Cyrtometopus ANG. e. p., Sph&rocoryphe ANG., Pseudosphcerexochus SCHMIDT and Nieszkowskia SCHMIDT. ! LINDSTROM 1885 gave a better copv of ANGELIN'S type specimen. — The tail (plate XLI, fig. 15*) presu- mably does not belong here. (The asterisk of the number 15 is wanting in the letterpress). — LIND- STROM in his explanation to fig. 15 (a) of the plate XXXIX, wrongly cites p. 76 instead of 79, which easily leads to confound this species with Sphcerexochus conformis ANG. 22 A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities t Chirurus exsul BETR. » glaber ANG 31 79 79 XXI XXXIX XXXIX 2 18 16 lc DE 01; Sk.: Nobbelof (boulders) Dal » ornatus DALM. 81 XXI 1 C 00.: Husbyfiol.. » punctatus ANG. > speciosus His. 79 78 XXXIX XXXIX 17 14 DE E Dal. GrQtl Chirurus (Nieszkowskia) tumidus) ANG. sp. I Conocoryphe CORDA 62 Conocoryphe breviceps ANG. sp. Conocoryohe Dalmani ANG 63 XXXIII 16 B Sk «/ I » ? glabrata ANG. 72 XXXVII 8 B Sk : Andrarum Conocoryphe laticeps ANG. sp Corynexochus ANG 59 ' Corvnexochus SDinulosus ANG. 59 XXXIII f9,9a \ B Sk. : Andrarum */ Corynexochus? umbonatus ANG 60 XXXIII 1(11?) 10 1 C Sk.: Fogelsaug Cryptonymus EICHW 2 Cryptonymus bellatulus DALM. 3 IV 1—3 C 6g.: Husbyfjol, Oraberg; 01.: Bodahamn » caudatns ANG. IsBvis ANG 88 4 XLI IV 11 10 DE E Nonvay : Brevig. Gotl: Hogkliut » obtusus ANG. 3 IV 9 E Gotl.: Katthammarsvik > punctatus WAHL. » striatus ANG. 3 89 IV XLI 4—8 13 E DE Gotl.; Sk.: Ringsjon (boulders' Dal.: Osmundsberg » verrucosus DALM. 4 V 1 D Vg.: Bestorp Ctenopyge LINRS. Ctenopyge teretifrons ANG sp Cybele LOVEN 88 »/ Cvbele bellatula DALM. «t/ Cybele brevicauda ANG. 89 XLI 14 DE Dal.: Osmundsberg */ > dentata ESM. Cybele verrucosa DALM. 89 XLI 12 DE Norway: Christiania. Cyphaspis BURM. Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavian, with notes 23 Notes Compare SCHMIDT 1881, p. 137. > » » p. 151. » p. 133. Not to confound with Cyrtometopus speciosus DALM. — Compare LINDSTROM 1885, p. 44. See Cyrtometopus tumidus and C. gibbus. GRONWALL 1902, p. 84, divided this genus in four subgenera: Conocoryphe CORDA s. s., Erinnys SALTER, Ctenocephalus CORDA and Liocephalus GRONWALL. See Harpides breviceps and the note to Elyx laticeps. Belongs to the subgenus Erinnys. Compare LINNARSSON 1879, p. 19. Belongs to the subgenus Conocoryphe s. s. Compare GRONWALL 1902, p. 93. Belongs to the subgenus Conocoryphe s. s. See Elyx laticeps. Belongs to the subgenus Ctenocephalus. Compare GRONWALL 1902, p. 136. (According to GRONWALL 1902, p. 139, the tail, by ANGELIN with doubt referred to this species, probably \ does not belong to C. spinulosus. Compare GKONWALL, 1. c. By MOBERG 1907 stated to belong to the genus Aeglina. This name was rejected by later authors, and the forms referred to Cryptonymus were distributed to the genera Cybele LOVEN and Encrinurus EMMR. Compare BABRANDE 1856, p. 22, and SCHMIDT 1881, p. 196. j-By ANGELIN himself, on p. 89, referred to Cybele. — Compare SCHMIDT 1881, p. 203, and 1907, p. 17. Belongs to Encrinurus. According to LINDSTROM 1885, p. 52, this form may be regarded as a variety of E. punvtatus. Belongs to Encrinurus. — Compare LINDSTROM 1885, p. 52. » > » » SCHMIDT 1881, p. 225. » > » In the explanation of the plate called Cybele striatus. By ANGELIN himself, on p. 89, referred to Cybele. See Sphcerophthalmus teretifrons. See the note to Cryptonymus. See Cryptonymus bellatulus. Compare SCHMIDT 1881, p. 219. See Cryptonymus verrucosus. 24 A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities Cyphaspis elegantula ANG. sp. Cyrtoiiietopus ANG. 32 Cyrtometopus affinis ANG. 77 XXXIX 10 (J Od : .Liunfir Cyrtometopus aries EICHW. Cyrtometopus clavifrons DALM. e.p. Cyrtometopus? decacanthus ANG. / 32 I 77 35 XXI XXXIX XXII 41 9 f 5 c D 6#.:Husbyljol; Vg,: Billingeii; Smdl.: Humlenas; 01.: Res- mo; ^.:Fogelsang,Gardlosa; i Norway: Ladegaardsoen .... Vg.: Mosseberg Cvrtometopus diacanthus ANG. 35 XXII 4 C SJc.: Fogelsang j foveolatus ANG. 77 XXXIX 8 SO Vg : Humieberg Cyrtometopus gibbus ANG. 78 XXXIX 13 G Oq.: Husbvfio!.. Cyrtometopus longispinus ANG. » octacanthus ANG. Cyrtometopus primigeuus ANG. sp. 36 36 xxir XXII 7 6 D D Vg.: Kinnekulle. Vg.: Kinnekulle. Cvrtometopus Sarsi ANG. 78 XXXIX 11 Da? Norway •7 » scrobiculatus ANG. » speciosus DALM 35 77 XXII XXXIX 3 7 *>C C? Sk.: Fogels^ng. 01 Cyrtometopus tumidus ANG. 78 XXXIX 12 c Oa.: Husbyfiol .. Deiphon BARR. Deiphon Forbesi BARR 66 » globifrons ANG 66 XXXIV 7 E Gotl » Isevis ANG. punctatus ANG 77 77 XXXIX XXXIX 5 6 DE DE Dal. Dal Diaphanometopus F. SCHMIDT Diaphanometopus lineatus ANG. sp. Dicellocephalina BROGGER Dicellocephalina dicrseura ANG. sp Dionide BARR. Dionide euglvpta ANG. sp O «/ 1 X" Dolichometopus ANG. Dolichometopus Svecicus ANG 72 73 XXXVII 9 B Sic : Andrarum Dysplanus BUKM. 39 Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes Notes See Goniopleurn elegantula. According to SCHMIDT 1881, p. 125, a subgenus of Chirurus. Compare SCHMIDT 1881, p. 157. See Sphcerexochusf clavifrons. Compare SCHMIDT 1881, p. 153. See also C. Sarsi and C. diacanthui. According to RAVN 1899, p. 57, this species belongs to Acidaspis. The same author stated that the head, referred to this species, by ANGELIN does not belong hereto. According to BROGGER 1882, p. 131, possibly identical with C. clavifrons. Compare MOBEKG and SEGERBEKG 1906, p. 102. ANGELIN'S statement that this species belongs to regio D is surely only a mispjint. According to SCHMIDT identical 'with Chirurus (Nieszkoivskia) tumidus. — Compare SCHMIDT 1881, p. 180. See Pliomera primigena. According to SCHMIDT 1881, p. 15^*' and BROGGER 1882, p. 131, identical with C. clavifrons. Compare MOBERG and SEGERBERG 1906, p. 103. Belongs to the subgenus Nieszkowskia. Compare SCHMIDT 1881, p. 180. See also the note to C. See the following species. According to LINDSTROM 1885, p. 51, identical with D. Forbesi. According to TORNQUIST 1884, p. 22, identical with Z>. Forbesi. LINDSTROM 1888: I, p. 21, and WIMAN 1907: 1, p. 4, however, regard it as a distinct species. See Nileus? lineatus. See Centropleura ? dicroeura. See Polytomurus euglyptus. Compare LINNARSSON 1873, p. 246. Dysplanus, a subgenus of Illasnus, has, according to HOLM 1883, p. 13, to be dropped ; the species ascribed hereto ought to be referred to lllcenus s. s. Lands Univ:s Arsskrift. N. F. Afd. 2. Bd 6. 4 26 A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities Dysplanus centaurus DALM. 40 XXIII 1 0 01: Alboke Dysplanus centrotus DALM. 40 XXIII 2 c 6g.: Husbyf jol ; Norway: Christiania Ellipsocephalus ZENKEB Ettipsocephalus muticus ANG. sp. Elyx ANG. 4 Elyx laticeps ANG. 4 v I 2 1 B Sk. ' Andrarum Encrinurus EMME. I (not 3) Encrinurus caudatus ANG. sp. » laevis ANG. sp. » obtusus ANG. sp. » punctatus WAHL. » striatus ANG. sp. • Euloma ANG. Euloma laeve ANG. 61 61 XXXIII 14 c? 6g.: Berg. Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavian, with notes 27 Note This species ought to be called Illcenus centaurus ANGELIN (not DALMAN). — On describing this species ANGELIN thought proper to refer to it some free cheeks produced in great spines, which DALMAN (Om Palseaderna. Kgl. Vet.-Akad. Handl. 1826, p. 261) had before mentioned under the provisional name Asaphus (Illcmus) centaurus. He therefore added to his figure great genal spines and cited DALMAN as the auctor of the species in question. ANGELIN'S figure is rather rough and his descrip- tion not very characteristic, but afterwards STEINHARDT (1874, p. 47), who had to his disposal :i specimen determined by ANGELIN, gave a detailed description of the species and furnished good natural reproductions of it (without free checks). HOLM (1883, p. 90), after examining the free cheeks mentioned by DALMAN, which have proved to belong to a Megalaspis, probably identical with M. latilimbata ANG., thought proper for the free cheeks mentioned to keep the name M. centaurus DALM. sp. and also to give a new name Illcenus Chiron HOLM to the Mlcenus-species referred to by ANGELIN. HOLM does not seem to have duly taken into consideration the fact that DALMAN'S Asaphus (Illcenus) centaurus was based not only on the free cheeks but also on fragments of a cranidium, which may possibly suggest that DALMAN based his I. centaurus on fragments, part of which belonged to some species of Megalaspis, others again to a veritable Illcenus. As it might be difficult to decide what the Illcenus centaurus of DALMAN has really been, all the more as it may be scarcely possible to distinguish Megalaspis-spccies of the latilimbata-type only by means of the free cheeks, and on the other hand ANGELIN'S Illcenus centaurus (apart from the free cheeks) has never given occasion to any doubt as to which species is intended, it seems — as REMELE (1883, p. 41, note 4) and other authors have before pointed out — not very appropriate to introduce a new name for the latter species. SCHMIDT, who accepted his collaborator HOLM'S denomination for Illcenus centaurus, considered the free cheeks mentioned by DALMAN to be identical with those of Megalaspis grandis SARS sp. and proposed to exchange this name into Megalaspis centaurus DALMAN sp. After what has been said above, this, however, may hardly be considered appropriate. •Compare HOLM 1883, p. 99. — As to the hypostoma compare LINDSTEOM 1901, pi. 3, fig. 55. See Liostracus muticus. See the note to Acontheus. By LINNARSSON 1879, p. 17, referred to the genus Conocoryphe. The >tail>, by ANGELIN ascribed to this species, is according to GRONWALL 1902, p. 97, really a headshield belonging to C. breviceps. See the note to Cryptonymus. See Cryptonymus. 28 A. H. Weetergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities Euloma ornatum ANG. 92 XLII 3 BC Vq.: Hunneberg; Norway: ' Oslo Eurvcare ANG. 47 «/ Eurycare angustatum ANG. 48 XXVI 5 A Sk.: Andrarum » brevicauda ANG. » camuricorne ANG. 48 48 XXVI XXVI 4 5 A A Sk.: Andrarum. Sl\: Andrarum latum BOECK Forbesia M'CoY 48 22 XXVI 6 A Vg.: Carlsfors, Hunneberg; Sk.: Andrarum ; Norway. Forbesia ? brevifrons ANG 63 XXXIII 18 DE Vg : Alleberg » concinna DALM. 22 XVII 5 E Gotl » conspersa ANG. 23 XVII 6 E Gotl Goniopleura COEDA 23 Goniopleura elegautula LOVEN 211 ! I xvii 7 E Gotl Harpes GOLDP 23 85 If ffarpes corniculatus ANG. sp. Harpes costatus ANG. » Scanicus ANG. Wegelini ANG. Harpides BETE. Harpides breviceps ANG 85 86 85 86 87 XL1 XLI XLI XLI 4 5 3 8 DE C DE B Dal.: Osmundsberg. Sk.: Fogelsang. Dal. » Sk ' Andrarum Harpides rugosus S. et B. 87 XLI 7 BC Vg.: Hunneberg; Norway: Oslo Holoraetopus ANG. Holometopus aciculatus ANG. Holometopus''' elatifroris ANG 58 58 90 XXXIII XLI 5 17 DE BC Vg.: Kinnekulle. Vg ' Hunneberg Holometopus lirabatus ANG. ornatus ANG. Homalonotus KON. 58 ' 58 29 XXXIII XXXIII 7 6 C DE Sk.: Fogelsang. Vg.: Kinnekulle. Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes 29 Notes (Compare MOBERG and SEGERBERG 1906, p. 84. As to the diagnosis of the genus compare PERSSON 1904, p. 524. Compare PERSSON 1904, p. 517. J According to PERSSON 1904, p. 516, this species is based on fullgrown specimens of E. latum. Compare I also BROGGER 1882, p. 118. [Compare PERSSON 1904, p. 513. See the preceding note. - j This name was rejected by later authors and the species ascribed to Forbesia were referred to the genus 1 Proetus STEIN. Compare SCHMIDT 1894, p. 38. = Proetus brevifrons. Compare LINNARSSON 1869, p. 72. concinnus. LINDSTROM 1885, p. 78, and SCHMIDT 1894, p. 41. — » conspersus. > > p. 79, > » p. 46, and, as to the hypo- stoma, LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 6, fig. 25. I This genus, erected in 1847 by CORDA for only one species G. (Proetus) elegantulus, is according to BAR- l RANDE 1856, p. 22, and later authors synonymous with Gyphaspis BURM. = Cyphaspis elegantula. See the preceding note. On page 21' referred to the genus Proetus STEIN. — As to the hypostoma compare LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 3, fig. 24, 25. NOVAK (Studien an Hypostomen bohmischer Trilobiten. N:o II. Sitz.-Ber. Kgl. Bohm. Ges. d. Wiss. Prag 1884) proposed to separate the ordovician species from this genus and to bring them together to a new genus Harpina. See Arraphus corniculatus. l According to GRONWALL, 1902, p. 97, this species belongs to the genus Conocoryphe. See also the note to Elyx laticeps, [Compare MOBERG and SEGERBERG 1906, p. 85. BROGGER 1882, p. 128, gave a fuller description and more perfect figure, and, recognising that this species did not belong to Holometopus, he 1896, p. 68, note, proposed for it the generic name Orometopus. LAKE 1907, p. 45, stated that the tail, doubtfully ascribed to this species by MOBERG and SEGER- BERG, does not belong to Holometopus. Compare LAKE, 1. c. A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities Homalonotus Knighti KON. var. 1 L ' J. • A i rhinotropis ANG. J Homalonotus platynotus DALM. » rhinotropis ANG. 29 30 XIX XX 6 1 DE E Vg.: Mosseberg, Alleberg. Sk.: Klinta; Gotl.: Bursvik, Hoburer etc. . Illsenus DALM. Illcenus Anqelini HOLM 41 » (Bumastus) barriensis \ ~\ir • MURCH. J Illcenus centaurus ANG. sp. » centrotus DALM. Illsenus crassicauda WAHL. » Esmarki SCHLOTH. 41 XXIV 2 C Og.: Husbyf jol, Skarpasen, He- da etc.; F#.;Medelplana; 01.: Resmo; Sk.: Fogelsaug, Toste- rup; Norway: Ladegaardsoeu Illcenus lineatus ANG. sp » oblongatus ANG. sp Isocolus ANG. Isocolus Sjogreni ANG. 58 59 XXXIII 8 DE Dal Leptoplastus ANG. 46 Leptoplastus ovatus ANG. 47 xxvi 3 A Sk.: Audrarum raphidophorus ANG. » stenotus ANG. 47 47 XXVI XXVI 2 1 A A Sk.: Andrarum. Sk.: Andrarum Lichas DALM 68 Lichas aculeatus ANG. 75 XXXVIII 11 Db Vg.: Kinnekulle » affinis ANG. 1. 69 XXXVI 2 IDE Og.: Borenshult \ » celor(r)hin ANG. 73 69 XXXVIII XXXV 4 1 ) C 6g.: Husbyf jol, Skarpasen; Smal.: Humlen^s » cicatricosus LOVEN 74 XXXVIII [6b DE Dal 19 b)J Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes 31 Notes See H. rhinotropis. This species, earlier considered to be identical with H. Knighti KON., is according to MOBERG and GRON- WALL 1909, p. 72, a distinct variety, var. rhinotropis, of that same species. — As to the hypostoma compare LINDSTKOM 1901, pi. 4, fig. 20, See Rhodope ? lata. See Bumastus Lindstrbmi and B? glomerinus. See Dysplanus centaurus. See Dysplanus centrotus. According to HOLM 1883, p. 55, identical with /. Esmarki SCHLOTH. — As to the hypostoma compare LlNDSTROM 1901, pi. 4, fig. 80. See I. crassicauda. v Rhodope lineata. > Rhodope? oblongata. Compare TORNQUIST 1884, p. 89. As to the limitation of this genus compare PERSSON 1904, p. 524. Compare PERSSON 1904, p. 520, and HOLTEDAHL 1910, p. 8. Compare PERSSON 1904, p. 522. As to the diagnosis of the genus Lichas and its subgenera compare SCHMIDT 1885, p. 39. See also the note to Platymetopus. According to LINNARSSON 1869, p. 66, identical with L. laxatus M'CoY. Compare TORNQUIST 1884, p. 33. >Compare BROGGER 1882, p. 128, SCHMIDT 1885, p. 56, and 1907, p. 29. See also L. norvegicus. The head by ANGELIN referred to this species does not belong to it; compare SCHMIDT 1885, p. 122. and 1907, pp. 44 and 102. According to SCHMIDT 1885, p. 62, identical with L. verrucosa EICHW. Compare SCHMIDT 1885, p. 53. By SCHMIDT ascribed to the the subgenus Platymetopus. 32 A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio 1 Localities Lichas deflexus SJOGB. 71 XXXVII 3 Da? 01. (boulders) » depressus ANG. 70 XXXVI 4 Da? 01. (boulders) » gibbns ANG. 71 XXXVII 1 E Gotl » Gothlandicus ANG. 75 XXXVIII 10 F, G-otl - laciniatus WAHL. Lichas laticeps ANG. 69 70 XXXVI XXXVI 1 8 DE 1 F, Vg.: Mosseberg, Alleberg. Gotl Lichas latifrons ANG. » laxatus M'CoT ?(72 71 72 XXXVII XXXVI XXXVII 5) 9 6 1 (E Gotl. » lineatus ANG. sp. » Norvegicus ANG. 73 XXXVIII 2 c? Norway » Oelandicus ANG. » ornatus ANG. 71 72 XXXVI XXXVII 10 7 c E 01 Gotl » pachvr(r)hinus DALM. 73 XXXVIII 1 C 6g.: Husbyfjol tj \ / » planifrons ANG. sp. » polytomus ANG. Lichas pusillus ANG. 69 71 XXXVI XXXVII 3 V DE E Vg.: llleberg. Gotl > 4-spinus ANG. 84 XL 20 D? Norway Lichas rotundifrons ANG. -{o , 70 XXXVI 7 I F- Gotl » 6-spinus ANG. 72 74 XXXVII XXXVIII 4 7,8 f D? Norway » VCrruCOSUS- ElCHW. Liostracus ANG. Liostracus aculeatus ANG. 27 23',27 XIX 2 A 01 ' Borgholm » costatus ANG. 90 XLI 16 A Vg ' Honsater Liostracus microphthalmus ANG. sp. Liostracus muticus ANG. 27 XIX 3 A 01 . Lonchodomas ANG. 80 Lonchodomas affinis ANG. » carinatus ANG. 83 82 XL XL 14 12 Da? Norway. crassirostris ANG. domatus ANG. 83 83 XL XL 13 16,17 Da BC Norway. Vg.: Hunneberg; Norway: Oslo ! jugatus ANG. » rostratus SABS 83 82 XL XL 15 11 C Da 01: Boda. Vg.: Kinnekulle; Norway: Christiania , Megalaspis ANG. Mesralasois acuticauda ANG. 15 50 XXVII 4 C 01. Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes Notes Compare SCHMIDT 1885, p. 101. » p. 95. This species must be dropped. According to LINDSTROM 1885, p. 61, it is based on the head of Trochurus pmillus ANG. and the tail of Tr. Salteri FLETCH. ANGELIN has regio C, surely a misprint. — Compare SCHMIDT 1885, p. 113. [According to LINDSTROM 1885, p. 60, identical with Trochurus Salteri FLETCH.; to this species belongs the tail of ANGELIN'S L. gibbus and not the tail (Tab. XXXVII, fig. 5) with doubt ascribed by ANGELIN to L, laticeps. Compare LINDSTROM, 1. c. See L. aculeatus and L. 6-spinus. See Platymetopus lineatus. According to BROGGER 1882, p. 128, a variety of L. celorrhin ANG. See also the note to that same species. Compare SCHMIDT 1885, p. 109. > p. 5^ and 1907, p. 33. See Platymetopus planifrons. By LINDSTROM 1885, p. 61, referred to the genus Trochurus BEYR. See also the note to L. gibbus. — As to the hypostoma compare LINDSTKOM 1901, pi. 4, fig. 52. I By LINNARSSON 1869, p. 68, referred to the genus Remopleurides and possibly identical with R. dorsospi- \ nifer PORTL. (This species is possibly identical with L. Grayi FLETCH. The tail, with doubt ascribed to L. rotundi- l frons by ANGELIN, presumably belongs to Trochurus pusillus. Compare LINDSTROM 1885, p. 59. According to LINNARSSON 1869, p. 66, identical with L. laxatus M'Cov. Compare also SCHMIDT 1885, p. 125. See Lie-has convexus. On p. 231 ANGELIN wrote Calymene aculeata. — Compare LINNARSSON 1879, p. 11. Compare LINNARSSON 1869, p. 71, and WALLERIUS 1895, p. 54. See Anomocare microphthalmum. Belongs to the genus Ellipsocephalus ZENKER; compare LINNARSSON 1877, p. 364—366. This genus was by BARRANDE 1856, p. 22, and later authors brought together with the genus Ampyx DALM. On p. 20 by ANGELIN described under the name Ampyx carinatus. [Compare MOBERG and SEGERBERG 1906, p. 100. Compare SCHMIDT 1894, p. 85. Compare SCHMIDT 1906, p. 42, and 1907, p. 85. Lands Univ:s Arsskrift. N. F. Afd. 2. Bd 6. 34 A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities Megalaspis excavato-zonata ANG. 54 XXIX 4 c 01 Megalaspis explanata ANG. 17 XV 3 c Vg.: Khmekulle. » extenuata WAHL. 17 XV 1 c Og.: Husbyfjol, Heda, Ljung, Berg etc.; Smdl.: Hum- lenas; Sk.: Fogelsang .... gigas ANG. 16 XII 3 c 01.: Segerstad etc. » grandis SAES » Heros DALM. 16 XIII c Vg.i Osterplana etc. 5 Og.: Husbyfjol etc Megalaspis latilimbata S. et B. 16 XIV 1, 3 c 01.: Sandvik etc limbata S. et B. 18 XVI 7 3 c Vg.: Kinnekulle; Sk.: Fogel- sang etc.; 01 » multiradiata ASG. 16 XIV 2 c Oq.: Liung etc » plauilimbata ANG. 18 XVI 2 c ^y* J^jVAia& v Vg.: Oitorp rotundata ANG. 17 XV 2 c Vg.: KinDekulle. » rudis ANG. 50 XXVII 5 c Og.: Husbyfjol, Heda etc. ... » stenorhachis ANG. 17 XVI 1 c Og.: Husbyfjol. » zonata ANG. 54 XXIX 5 c 01. Nileus DALM. 18 Nileus Armadillo DALM. 19 XVI 5 c Og.: Husbyfjol, Heda, Berg; Vg.: Kkmekulle; 01.: Res- mo etc. ; Sic.: Fogelsang, Tomarp, Tosterup etc. ... Nileus? lineatus ANG. 60 XXXIII 12 c? Vg • Oitorp » palpebrosus DALM. 18 XVI 4 c Og.: Husbyfjol etc.; Vg.: Oitorp, Martorp etc.; Sk.: Fogelsan0" Niobe ANG. 13 Niobe eraarginula ANG. 15 XI 3 c Vg • Oitorp » explauata ANG. 15 I XI 4 \ c SJc ' Fogelsanc \ XII 2 I [ TT o 1 Og.: Husbyfjol, Ljung, Heda » frontalis ANG. 14 y\.j. VTT L. 1 0 1 etc.; OZ.;Resmo etc.; Sk.: I A. 11 1 J Fogelsang Niobe lata ANG. 14 x D Vg ' Bestori > Niobe laeviceps ANG. 14 XI 1 c j Og.: Husbyfjol, Heda etc. ; 01.: Res-mo . Index to N. P. Angelin's Palreontologia Scandinavica, with notes 35 Notes According to SCHMIDT 19(M, p. 45, this species belongs to the genus Ptychopyge, He nlso preferred the new name Pt. cincta BROGGER (1886), wich is a synonyme to this. LCompare SCHMIDT 1906, p. 49. See M. multiradiata, AI. Intilimbata and M. rudis. See also the note to Illcenus centaurus. Compare SCHMIDT 1906, p. 51. Probably identical with M. grandis SARS. Compare HOLM 1883, p. 90, and SCHMIDT 1906, p. 56. Compare SCHMIDT 1906, p. 17, and, as to the hypostoma, LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 5, fig. 7. . According to BROGGER 1882, p. 80, identical with M. grandis SARS. Compare also SCHMIDT 1906, p. 54. Compare WIMAN 1905, p. 8, MOBERG and SEGERBERG 1906, p. 97, SCHMIDT 1906, p. 10, and, as to the hypostoma, LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 5, fig. 8. According to BROGGER 1882, p. 80, TORNQUIST 1884, p. 78, and SCHMIDT 1906, p. 56 and 60, a variety of M. grandis SARS, but according to WIMAN 1907: 2, p. 91, presumably a distinct species. (Compare MOBERG 1902, WIMAN 1904 and SCHMIDT 1904. p. 64. As to the hypostoma compare BROGGER 1886, pi. 3, fig. 40, and LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 5, fig. 13. By WIMAN 1906, p. 291, ascribed to the genus Diapkanvmetopus F. SCHMIDT. ^By ANGELIN himself on p. 61 referred to the genus Symphysurus BURM. Compare BROGGER 1882, p. 61. The hypostoma was described by BROGGER 1886, p. 66.' A synonyme is N. frontalis KJERULF 1865. Compare BROGGER 1882, p. 68. As for the hypostoma see BROGGER 1886, pi. 2, fig. 33. As to the hypostoma see BROGGER 1886, pi. 2, fig. 35. INot identical with N. frontalis KJERULF 1865. As to the hypostoma see BROGGER 1886, pi. 2, fig. 37. According to OLIN 1906, p. 62, identical with Asaphus ingens BARR. ICompare SCHMIDT 1900, p. 103. As to the hypostoma see LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 5, fig. 23. 36 A. fl. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities Ogygiocaris ANG. 92 Ogygiocaris dilatata BRUNN. 92,95 XLII 2 Da Norway: Christiania . » » var. Sarsi ANG. 96 XLII 1 Da \S Norway : Eger » » Stromi ANG. Oleuus DALM. Olenus? acanthurus ANG. 96 42 44 XLII XXV 2* 7 Da A Norway: Eger. Sk.: Sandby... Olenus aciculatus ANG. 44 XXV 6 A Sk.: Andrarum » aculeatus ANG. » attenuatus BOECK » gibbosus WAHL. Olenus sphsenopygus ANG. 43 43 44 43 XXV XXV XXV XXV 4 2 5 3 A A A A Sk.: Andrarum. Sk.: Andrarum. Vg.: Klefva ; etc. Sk. : Fogelsang Sk.: Andrarum Olenus truncatus BRUNN. Orometopus BROGGER Orometopus elatifrons ANG. sp. 43 XXV 1 A 01: Mockleby; Sk.: Andra- rum. Parabolina SALTER Parabolina acanthura ANG. sp. 45 Parabolina spinulosa WAHL. 46 50 XXV XXVII 9 3 I'M Vg.: Hunneberg, Gudhem etc. ; Sk : Andrarum Paradoxides BRONGN. Paradoxides affinis ANG. 1 94 la 3-3 a B Sk.? » Forchhammeri ANG. I 2 II1 1-3 \ B Sk.: Andrarum Paradoxides Loveni ANG. 95 2 II III1 TTT 1 1 — 3 1—3 1, la, I u Sk ' Andrarum Paradoxides rugulosus CORDA 95 III { 4a,4b I Tessiui BRONQN. » L. (geuuinus) 1 93 I1 I 1—3 A A f Vg.: Oltorp, Gidaholm, Carls- 1 fors; 01.: Borgholm, Ormoga; Vg.: Oltorp Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes 37 Notes ANGELIN substituted Ogygiocaris for the older trilobite name Ogygia BRUNN. because a genus of lepidopters was formerly named Ogygia. Later authors, however, have mostly used the name Ogygia. Com- pare BARRANDE 1856, p. 20. As for the hypostoma compare BROGGER 1886, p. 77. By MOBERG and MOLLER 1898, p. 259, ascribed to the genus Parabolina SALTEE. Not identical with Protopeltur-a acanthura BROGGER 1882, p. 106, which ought to be called Peltura precursor WESTERGARD. By LINDSTROM 1888: I, p. 5, with doubt referred to this genus. According to LINNARSSON 1880, p. 137, identical with Sphcerophthalmus alatus BOECK. See Holometopus? elatifrons. See Olenus? acanthurus. jcompare BROGGER 1882, p. 100. According to LINDSTROM 1888: I, p. 4, the stratigraphical place of this species may be the zone of Paradoxides Davidis. Compare BROGGER 1878, p. 37. By ANGELIN later referred to the genus Centropleura ANG. — Compare GRONWALL 1902, p. 124. See also the note to Centropleura. See P. tumidus. >See the following two varieties Oelandicus and Wahlenbergi. First mentioned and figured by LINNAEUS (Museum Tessinianum 1753, p. 98) under the name Entom olithus Monoculi or E. paradoxus but as it seems not duly distinguished from other trilobites. The origi- nal was from Dimbo, Vg.; no other specimen of this kind has ever been found. As the middle of the cranidium is completely damaged (compare NATHORST 1907, p. 63), the real nature of the spe- cies cannot be investigated. Until the species can be fixed by means of new finds it has to be neglected. For the present, of course, also the question about the synonymy is of no consequence. 38 A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Eegio Localities Paradoxides Tessini var. Oelandicusl 94 Ia"i 2-2 c A 01 ANG. Paradoxides Tessini var. Wahlen-1 94 la 1-1 h A Vg.: Oltorp bergi ANG. Paradoxides tuberculatus ANG. » tuniidus ANG. 94 95 la III 4 2-2 a B B 8k.? Bornholm Peltura MILNE EDWARDS Peltura scarabseoides WAHL. 44 45 XXV 8 A Vg.: Kaflas, Klefva, Carls- fors; Ner.: Latorp; 01.: Algutsram; Sk.: Andra- r u m ; Norway : Oslo Phacops EMMB. Phacops sequicostata ANG. 8 11 VIII 4 E Gotl » breviceps ANG. IV IX 4 E Sk.: Ringsion: Gotl. bucculenta SJOGR. 9 VII 1, 2 O u jl.: Eriksore (boulders) » caudata BRUNN. 10 VIII | 2a, 2b \ E Gotl » conicophthalma S. et B. » Downinqice MTJRCH. 9 VII not 2c 5, 6 1 C 01.: Boda; Vg.: Gisseberg; Sk.: Gronby (boulders) ... » eucentra ANG. 11 IX 1 HE Sk.: Rostanga » granulosa ANG 11 IX 3 Vg. ' Kinnekulle (boulders) » imbricatula ANG. 10 VIII 3 E Gotl » macroura SJOGR. 9 VII 3, 4 01.: Segerstad; Vg. ' Kinne- kulle mucronata BRONGN. » 4-liiieata ANG. 10 12 VIII IX 1 5 DE E Vg.: Alleberg, Mosseberg; Og.: Borenshult, Husbyfjol. Gotl ' » sclerops DALM. 11 IX 2 C Dal.: Furudal; Og.: Husby- fjOl, Skarpasen, Ljung etc.; Vg.: Varnhem; Sm.: Humlenas; 01. : Resrno etc. ; Sk.: Foselsane tumida ANG. 10 VII 7, 8 o o Sk • Tingarod (boulders) . . » vulyaris SALTER Phaetonides BARR. Phaetonides Stokesi MTJRCH. 21 sr.fls XVII 4 E Gotl Pbarostoma CORDA Pharostoma? Oelandicum ANG. 62 62 XXXIII 15 c 01 Platymetopus ANG. 68 Index to N. P. Angelin's Palaeontologia Scandinavica, with notes Notes (.According to LINNARSSON 1879, p. 6, and 1882, p. 10, these two varieties ought to be brought together with P. Tessini BRONGN. This variety oelandicus is. not to be confounded with P. oelandicus SJOGREN. According to GRONWALL 1902, p. 113, presumably identical with P. rugulosus CORDA. Compare LINNARSSON 1880, p. 4, BROGGER 1882, p. 107, and, as to the hypostoma, LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 3, fig. 42. See also the note to Anopocare pusillum. Compare LINDSTROM 1885, p. 42. Belongs probably to the subgenus Chasmops M'CoY. According to LINDSTROM 1885, p. 42, identical with Ph. (Acaste) Doumingioe MURCH. Compare SCHMIDT 1881, p. 105. Belongs to the subgenus Chasmops. [Identical with Ph. vulgaris SALT.; compare LINDSTROM 1885, p. 38, and 1901, pi. 3, fig. 51. Fig. 2 c belongs | to a Lichas. iBelongs to the subgenus Chasmops M'CoY. See Ph. breviceps. This species has often been confounded with Ph. mucronata BRONGN. Compare OLIN 1906, p. 41. By LINDSTROM 1888, p. 16, recorded from the Trinucleus shales. Compare LINDSTROM 1885, p. 40. •Belongs to the subgenus Chasmops. This species has often been confounded with Ph. elliptifrons ESM. Compare LINDSTROM 1885, p. 43. Compare SCHMIDT 1881, p. 77. Belongs to the subgenus Pterygometopus SCHMIDT. See also LINDSTROM 1901, p. 54. Belongs to the subgenus Chasmops M'CoY. See Ph. caudata. By ANGELIN at first (page 210 called Proetus Stokesi. — As to the hypostoma compare LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 6, fig. 11. According to TULLBERG 1882, p. 234, belonging to the Chasmops beds. According to SCHMIDT 1885, p. 29, 1907, p. 25, and other authors a subgenus of Lichas. LINDSTROM (1901, p. 67), however, looked upon Platymetopus as a genus of its own. 40 A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities Platymetopus lineatus ANG. 75 XXXVIII 1 }?>' \ OF, Dal » planifrons ANG. 73 XXXVIII 112af 3,3a?, iPF Dal Pliomera ANG. 30 3 b? / Pliomera actinura DALM. 35 XXII 2 C? 00.: Berg? Pliomera Fischeri EICHW. 30 XX 2 c Og.: Husbyfjol, Berg, Ljung; Vg.: Varuhem; 01.: Sand- vik; Sm.: Humlenas; Sk .; Norway: Christiania » Mathesii ANG. 35 XXII 1 BC? Vg. : Carlsf ors Pliomera priinigena ANG. 90 XLI 15 BC Norway: Oslo Polytomurus CORDA et/HAWLE 12 Polytomurus euglvptus ANG. 12 IX 6 D Vg.: Bestorp Proetus STEIN Proetus brevifroQS ANG sp 20 Proetus concinnus DALM. 211 XVII 5 E Gotl Proetus conspersus ANG. sp. Proetus? difformis ANG. » » var. aculeatus ANG. 221 221 XVIII XVIII 5 6 B B Sk.: Andrarumj Sk>: Andrarum> » » var. acuminatus ANG. » elegantulus ANG 22i 2ii XVIII XVII 7 7 B E Sk.: Andrarum' G-otl » ? excavatus ANG. » Isevis ANG. 22i 2li XVIII XVIII 3 1 B B Sk.: Andrarura\ Sk.: Andrarum 1 ? limbatus ANG. ? microphthalmus ANG. » Stokesi MURCH 221 22i 211 XVIII XVIII XVII 2 4 4 B B E 8k.: Andrarum | 8k.: Audrarum) Gotl Pseudospheerexochus F SCHMIDT Pseudosphcerexochus conformis ) ANG. sp. 1 Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes 41 Notes Compare SCHMIDT 1907, p. 26 and p. 101. The tail, fig. 13, with doubt ascribed by ANGELIN to this species, belongs according to SCHMIDT 1907, p. 27, presumably to a Chirurus. Compare TOHNQUIST 1884, p. 35. - As to the hypostoma see LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 4, fig. 50. ANGELIN substituted the name Pliomera for the name Amphion PAND. because this latter term was earlier employed for two genera of insects. Compare BARRANDE 1856, p. 21. — LINDSTROM 1888:1. p. 10, records PI. Iceve ANG. from the upper red Orthoceras limestone, but as ANGELIN never- described such a species LINDSTROM surely is wrong. Compare WIMAN 1907: 2, p. 87. See also the note to PI. Mathesii. JCompare SCHMIDT 1831, p. 191. According to WIMAN 1907, p. 87, this species presumably is identical with PL actinura; the type speci- men of PI. Mathesii would be a somewhat decorticated and distorted specimen of PI. actinura. — On p. Ill ANGELIN recorded this species with doubt from regio A, but later he transferred it to regio BC (compare BARRANDE 1856, p. 21). LINNARSSON 1869, p. 62, stated the species in question to belong to regio C. Belongs to the genus Cyrtometopus ANG.; compare MOBERG and SEGERBERG 1906, p. 101. The name Dionide BARR. (BARRANDE 1852, p. 640) ought to be substituted for the name Polytomurus HAWLE et CORDA 1847. On p. VI ANGELIN himself also writes Dionide (Polytomurus). See the preceding note. See Forbesia f brevifrons. By ANGELIN on p. 22 referred to the genus Forbesia M'CoY. — Compare LINDSTROM 1885, p. 78, SCHMIDT 1894, p. 41, and, as to the hypostoma, LINDSTROM 1901, pi. 6, fig. 21. See also the note to Forbesia. See Forbesia conspersa. By ANGELIN on p. 25 and 26 referred to the genus Anomocare; see this. By ANGELIN on p. 23 referred to the genus Goniopleura; see this. By ANGELIN on p. 25 referred to the genus Anomocare; see this. By ANGELIN on p. 22 referred to the genus Phaetonides; see this. A subgenus of Chirurus BEYR. s. 1.; compare SCHMIDT 1881, p. 126. See the corresponding species of the genus Sphcerexochus. Lands Univ:s irsskrift. N. F. Afd. 2. Bd 6. 6 42 A. H. Westerg&rd Genern and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities Pseudosphcerexochus granulatus | ANG. sp. J Pseudosphcprexochus Wegelini ^ ANG. sp. / Ptychopyge ANG. 51 PtvchoDvtre aciculata ANG. 56 XXXII 4 0 01 «/ Lj C> angustifrons DALM. applanata ANG. elliptica ANG. PhichovticiB excavato-zonata ANG so 55 51 55 XXXII XXVII XXX 1 6 3 C C C 6g.: Husbyfjol, Heda etc. ... Vg.: Kinnekulle. SJc.: Fogelsang. «/ j- t/i/ Ptychopyge glabrata ANG. 54 XXIX 3 T) Vq.: Kinnekulle » lata ANG. » limbata ANG. 55 56 XXXI XXXII 1 2 C C Sic.: Fogelsang. 01 > media ANG. •» multicostata ANG. » rimulosa ANG. Raphiophorus ANG. 56 55 55 80 XXXII XXX XXX 3 4 2 C C C Sic.: Fogelsang. Sic.: Fogelsang. Dal; 01. Raphiophoms culminatus ANG. 82 XL 8 Da Vg.: Kinnekulle » depressus ANG. 82 XL 9 Da Dal.: Dragg&bro » Scanicus ANG. 82 XL 10 D Sk.: Krapperup setirostris ANG. 81 XL 6 Da? Dal. : Draggabro tumidus ANG. 81 XL 7 Da Vg.: Kinnekulle Remopleurides POBTLOCK Remopleurides radians BARE. » 6-lineatus ANG sp Rhodope ANG. 38 Rhodope ? lata ANG. 41 XXIV 4 D Vg.: Mosseberg » lineata ANG. 39 XXII 17 C Oq. . » ? oblongata ANG. Solenopleura ANG. 41 26 XXIV 3 C 01.: Boda ; Norway: Christiania Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes 43 Notes the corresponding species of the genus Sphcerexochus. TORNQUIST (1884, p. 56), BROGGER (1886, p. 25) and at first also SCHMIDT (1898) considered Ptychopyge as a subgenus of Asaphus, but later the latter author (1904, p. 2) stated it to be a distinct genus separated from Asaphus. As to the hypostoma compare BROGGER 1886, pi. 1, fig. 13. Compare BROGGER (1882, p. 71, and 1886, p. 32) and SCHMIDT 1904, p. 34. See Megalaspis cxcavato-zonata. As to the hypostoma compare BROGGER 1886, pi. 1, fig. 14. Compare BROGGER 1882, p. 72, and SCHMIDT 1898, p. 31, and 1907, p. 80. This genus was by later authors brought together with the genus Ampyor. DALM. Identical with Ampyx Portlocki BARR.; compare LINNAKSSON 1871, p. 346, foot-note 1, and TORNQUIST 1884, p. 88. See the preceding note. See Brachypleura 4-lineata, » > 6-lineata. This name was proposed by ANGELIN for a section of Illcenus, mainly characterized by 8 thoracic seg- ments. The term Rhodope was by VOLBORTH in 1863 changed for the term Panderia because that former name was preoccupied for a genus of gastropods. Later authors usually don't use any of the two names in question. Possibly identical with Illcenus Angelini HOLM; compare HOLM 1883, p. 120. . Compare HOLM 1883, p. 117 I See the preceding note. > » p. 78 1 The four following species were by ANGELIN at first (pp. 231— 24i) ascribed to the genus Calymmene, but on pp. 26'— 281 he classed them with his later rejected genus Aulacopleura, for at last, pag. 26—28, to refer them all to the new genus Solenopleura. — BARRANDE (1856) and after him 44 A. H. Weslergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities Solenopleura brachymetopa ANG. » canalioulata ANG. ' 27 27 XIX XVIII 1, la 9 B B SJc.: Audrarum; Bornholm ... Sfc. • Andrarum » holometopa ANG. Solenopleura? stenometopa ANG. Sphaerexochus BE YE. Sphserexochus angustifrons ANG. 26 28 36 36 XVIII XIX XXII 8 4 8 B A IDE Sk : Andrarum ; Bornholnt . . . Vg.: Gudhera; 01.: Mockleby Dal Sphffirexochus ' clavifrons SARS 75 75 XXXVIII XXXVIII 16 18 D? NoTWttU Sphserexochus COnfornilS ANG 76 XXXIX 2 DE J)al ? deflexus ANG 76 xxxvm 19 c 6q . » granulatus ANG 76 XXXIX 3 DE Dal Sphserexochus latifrons ANG 37 XXII 10 i E G-0tl » mtru$ BEYR 75 xxxvm 15 1 » scabridus ANG < 37 56 XXII XXXIII 9 1 [D G-otl Sphperexochus \Vegelini ANG 75 76 xxxvm XXXIX 14 1 I DE Dal SphsBrocoryphe ANG 65 Sphaerocoryphe dentata ANG. » granulata ANG 66 76 XXXIV XXXIX 6 4 Db DE Vg.: Mosseberg. Dal Sphserometopus ANG. 651 [ Sphserometopus dentatus ANG. Sphserophthaluius ANG. Sphserophthalinus alatus ANG. » flagel lifer AN G 661 49 49 49 1 XXVI XXVI 9 7 A A Vg.: Klefya, Honsater, Halle- berg; 01. : Algutsruiu ; £&.; Andrarum; Norway : Oslo SJc ' Andraruiu Sphserophthalmus teretifrons ANG 49 XXVI 10 A Sk ~ Andrarum Staurocephalus BARE. Staurocephalus clavifrons ANG 67 67 XXXIV 8 DE Vo ' Alleberg Syrnphysurus BURM. Symphysurus breviceps ANG. 60 61 XXXIII 13 C? Vg.: Oltorp. Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes 45 Notes other authors wrote Selen«pleura, which name, as LINDSTHOM (1888: 1, p. 3, foot-note 1) has remarked, ANGELIN never used. Compare GRONWALL 1902, p. 153. » p. 151. > > p. 155. On this species WALLERIUS (1895, p, 52) has founded the new genus Acrocephalites. (According to TORNQUIST 1884, p. 20, identical with Sph. mirus BEYR. Fig. 16a and 17 of pi. XXXVIII 1 don't belong to this species. According to SCHMIDT 1881, p. 161, identical with Chirurus (Cyrtometopus) aries EICHW. Belongs to the genus Pseudosphcerexochus F. SCHMIDT. Compare SCHMIDT 1881, p. 174, and TORNQUIST 1884, p. 18. According to SCHMIDT 1881, p. 171, possibly belonging to Pseudosphcerexochus F. SCHMIDT. According to TORNQUIST 1884, p. 19, possibly identical with Pseudosphcerexochus conformis ANG. Compare LINDSTEOM 1885, p. 46. See Sph. angustifrons. See also the following note. [According to TORNQUIST 1884, p. 20, identical with Sph. mirus BEYR., but according to LINDSTHOM 1885, p. 45, distinguished from this species. Belongs to Pseudosphcerexochus F. SCHMIDT. According to SCHMIDT 1881, p. 166, a subgenus of Chirurus BEYR. s. 1. 'According to TORNQUIST 1884, p. 17, Chirurus (Cyrtometopus) pseudohemicranium NIESZK., described by SCHMIDT 1881, p. 163, is identical with this species. See also SCHMIDT 1907, p. 10. By ANGELIN himself, pp. 65 and 66, changed into Sphcerocoryphe and S. dentata ANG. Se these. I ANGELIN'S figure is incorrect. Compare LINNARSSON 1880, p. 7. See also the notes to Anopocare pusillum and Olenus sphcenopygus. Compare LINNARSSON 1880, p. 12. By LINNARSSON 1880, p. 22, referred to his genus Ctenopyge. Compare OLIN 1906, p. 48. 46 A. H. Westergard Genera and species Pag. Plate Fig. Regio Localities Symphysurus palpebrosus DALM. {181 1 61 / XVI 4 c j 6g.: Husbyfjol etc.; Vg.: Ol- torp, Martorp etc.; Sk.: Fo- ffelsansr . . Telephus BABR. Telephus bicuspis ANG. fractus BABR. 91 91 XLI 22 Da? Norway. grauulatus ANG. » Wegelini ANG. 91 91 XLI XLI 21 23 Da? Da Norway. Dal Trapelocera CORD A 34 Trapelocera bicuspis ANG. 34 XXI 7 T^ Gotl » ? breviloba ANG 38 XXII 16 DE Dal Triuucleus LHWYD, LINK, 1 MURCH. / Trinucleus affinis ANG. 64 65 XXXIV 17-T 1 5 20 a, Db \Dal •» bucculentus ANG 84 84 XL | XLI 21 1 }Db? Da Norway » carinatus ANG. > cerioides ANG. » coscinor(rh)inus ANG. > discors ANG. » foveolatus ANG. » seticornis His. » Wahlenbergi ROUAULT Trochurus BETR. emend. \ 65 65 65 84 85 84 64 XXXIV XXXIV XXXIV XL XLI XL XXXIV 3 . 2 4 18 2 19 1 Da? Da C Da Da Db? Db Vg.: Kiunekulle (boulders). Vg.: Kinnekulle. Sic.: Fogelsang. Norway. Norway. Dal.: Draggabro, Furudal... Vg~ Mosseberg, Billingeu, Alleberg. LlNDSTROM 1 Trochurus pusillus ANG sp » Salteri FLETCHER SD. Index to N. P. Angelin's Palaeontologia Scandinavica, with notes 47 Notes I By ANGELIN on p. 18 ascribed to the genus Nileus DALM. Compare BROGGER 1882, p. 61. See T. Wegelini. Identical with T. fractus BARR. Compare TORNQUIST 1884, p. 89. By BARRANDE (1852, p. 42) united with the genus Acidaspis MURCH. Compare LINDSTROM 1885, p. 56.) \ See the preceding note. According to TORNQUIST 1884, p. 84, identical with Tr. seticornis His. ANGELIN'S Ba is surely a misprint for Da. Compare J. G. ANDERSSON 1893, p. 532, and SCHMIDT 1894, p. 71. See also Tr. affinis. BEYRICH (1845, p. 31) described Trochurus speciosus n. g. et n. sp. (head and tail). Later he found that the head belonged to Staurocephalus Murchisoni BARR. and finding the peculiarities of the tail in question well exhibited on Arges armatus GOLDF., he withdrew the name Trochurus and classed the tail with the genus Arges (BEYRICH 1846, p. 8). BARRANDE and other authors considered Arges as a mere synonyme of Lichas. LINDSTROM (1885, p. 56), however, held forth that the forms ascri- bed to Arges, as showing peculiar characters, ought to be kept apart as making a genus of its own; but as the name Arges was preoccupied for another crustacean he proposed to revive the name Trochurus. See Lichas pusillus and L. rotundifrons. See » laticeps. 48 A. H. Westerg^rd Palseontologia Scandiuavica is really exclusively devoted to the Crustaceans. There is, however, one exception, to which I want here to call attention. On page IV ANGELIN speaks of Dictyograptus flabelliformis EICHW. sp. as a new Zoophyte genus for which he proposes the name Phyllograpta, a term which, however, for many reasons cannot be accepted. (Compare TORNQUIST: Ett inlagg i en synonyuri- fraga. - - Geol. Foren. i Stockholm Forhandl. Bd 14, p. 487.) 14 DAY USE RETURN TO DESK FROM WHICH BORROWED SCIENCES This book is due onTfif'fa&^Xte stamped below, or on the date to which renewed. Renewed books are subject to immediate recall. LD 21^50m-6,'60 (B1321slO)476 General Library University of California Berkeley