Historic, archived document

Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

SS is chs

A == tie TAA

WASHINGTON, D. C. PROFESSIONAL PAPER April 5, 1923

THE INFLUENCE OF COPPER SPRAYS ON. THE an oy COMPOSITION OF IRISH POTATO ERS.

By F. ©. Coox, Physiological Chemist, Insecticide and Fungicide Laboratory, Miscellaneous Division, Bureau of Chemistry.

CONTENTS. Page. Page. Purpose of investigation__________ 1 | Results of experimental work—Con. Results of previous investigations: Influence of strength and num- weieldoor potatoes. =. 2 aos ee 2 ber of applications of copper Composition of potatoes ______ 3 sprays on composition of Pl antse ce SeCNeT Al 2 4 tubers #2. 2 eee eee 17 Experimental procedure___________ 7 | Influence of environment on com- Results of experimental work : MOSsition Of. tupeESs | eee 18 Changes in composition of tubers Copper content of vines, stems,. Gunns! -STOw theese SE es bs tl roots, and tubers of sprayed Effect of copper sprays on yield and unsprayed plants ______ 19 and composition of tubers___ 10 |" General ‘discussion == aaa 21 Proportion of tubers to vines Summ anya 5 te ee ee 23 DLS. GUDeCISS sos eke ee Gel iteracure’ Cited. = oe a eee 24

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION.

For years Bordeaux sprays have been applied to the potato plant to control fungous diseases, particularly in the northern parts of the country where the late blight (Phytophthora infestans) frequently causes serious losses. In those parts of the Central and Southern States where potatoes are grown the only spray ordinarily applied igs an arsenical to control the Colorado potato beetle. Arsenicals are ‘usually added to the Bordeaux sprays. The formule of Bordeaux sprays may vary in different localities. A 5-5-50 spray is one in which 5 pounds of copper sulphate and 5 pounds of lime are used and the spray is made to 50 gallons with water.

The fact that potato plants treated with Bordeaux spray give larger yields of tubers than those which do not receive such applica- tions‘ has been established by a series of experiments extending over many years at the Vermont, Maine, and New York agricultural ex- periment stations. The influence of the copper sprays on the com- position of the tubers, however, has received no detailed study in this country. In view of the importance of the potato crop it is surpris- ing that practically no detailed analyses of potato tubers grown in the United States are available.

meager pa se oy

2, BULLETIN 1146, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

When in 1917 it was found that the solids, starch, and nitrogen contents of tubers from copper-sprayed potato plants were greater than those of tubers from unsprayed plants, an investigation was begun in the Bureau of Chemistry to determine the effect of Picker- ing sprays, barium-water sprays, and standard Bordeaux sprays as compared with that of noncopper sprays on the yield and on the com- position of potatoes grown in different localities. The distribution of copper in the tubers, roots, stems, and leaves of the various sprayed and unsprayed potato plants was studied also.

RESULTS OF PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS.

YIELD OF POTATOES.

Giddings (20),’ of the West Virginia station, fund that in 1909 three applications of Bordeaux increased the yield of potatoes 53.5 per cent and that in 1910 four applications increased the yield 39.3

er cent.

E In New York Stewart and his associates (46, 47,45) have conducted an extensive series of experiments to show the Benen: of Bordeaux spraying. In discussing the results obtained at the New York station in 1911 Stewart stated: ‘“ There was no late blight whatever, only a very little early blight and very little flea-beetle injury. The un- sprayed rows were affected by no disease of any consequence except

tip burn and even of that there was only a moderateamount, * * *- yet spraying increased the yield at the rate of 98 bushels per acre. Plainly we have here a striking example of the beneficial influence of Bordeaux in the absence of disease and insect enemies.’

In 1912 Lutman (32) published data from Vermont showing that a greater yield of tubers was obtained from copper-sprayed potato plants at various stages of growth than from the unsprayed plants. Plants which received a Pickering spray, a Bordeaux spray in which | part of the copper sulphate had been replaced by iron sulphate, and a commercial spray containing copper also gave higher yields than the check plants. The increased yield seemed to be in proportion to the amount of copper present in the spray. The application of a spray containing silver did not increase the yield. Lutman sug- gested that the Bordeaux mixture acts asa stimulant, bringing about an increase in the quantity of starch produced daily.

Clinton (8) in 1915 reported that homemade Bordeaux sprays used on potatoes in Connecticut uniformly increased the yields. Thé average increase for the sprayed plants during the 13 years that the tests were carried on was 36 bushels an acre. -

In 1916 Lutman (33) reported the results he obtained in 1912 from using 5-5-50 Bordeaux and 24-24-50 Bordeaux on potatoes in Ver- ‘mont. He concluded that “the amount of copper sulphate and lime used did not appear to be important providing the mixture was fairly strong. A little difference appeared in favor of the 5-550 combina- tion over the 24-24-50. Frequent and early sprayings did not seem favorably to affect the yield of tubers. Some of the plants were sprayed ten times but they produced little or no larger crops than did those plants sprayed less often.” .He stated further that the use

* Italic figures in parentheses refer to literature cited at end of bulletin.

COPPER SPRAYS ON IRISH POTATO TUBERS. 3

of Bordeaux under field conditions increases the yield of tubers from potato plants by preventing tip burn and flea-beetle injury. He be- lieved that the yields are not increased when plants which are not troubled by tip burn or flea beetle are sprayed. According to this investigator, Bordeaux mixture seems in the long run to be neither beneficial nor harmful, but it is unnecessary to apply it to plants grown in the greenhouse or to those in regions where neither tip burn nor flea beetles are a factor in potato growing and where neither early nor late blight occurs.

Babcock (4) reported in 1917 that spraying potatoes thoroughly with a 44-50 Bordeaux mixture in Ohio when the plants were about 8 inches high and every 10 days to two weeks thereafter materially increased the yield, even in years when there were no disease epi- demics.

Erwin (/6) reported a difference in yield in favor of the Bor- deaux-sprayed plots, indicating a definite response to the use of Bordeaux spray in Iowa. . When tip burn was generally present and early blight practically absent the yields were higher on the sprayed plots, indicating that the plants had been stimulated and benefited by the Bordeaux application.

In 1919 Leiby (29) published data obtained in North Carolina showing an average gain of 51.6 bushels an acre, representing 64.2 per cent, as a result of the use of a 34-50 Bordeaux plus lead arsenate spray on potatoes. Bordeaux alone produced an increased yaeld of 35 bushels an acre.

During a 10-year period in New York an average gain of 60 bushels an acre was obtained by spraying with Bordeaux. At the Vermont station during 20 years, which covered all seasonal varia- tions, an average gain of 105 bushels of potatoes an acre was effected by the use of Bordeaux. Experiments at the Maine station extend- ing over a period of years showed that spraying with Bordeaux gave increased yields of tubers, even in years when no late blight was prevalent.

COMPOSITION OF POTATOES.

Although no detailed analyses of potatoes grown in the United States are available, the results of several analytical studies of European varieties have been reported.

Kreusler (26) gives the results of analyses of large, medium, and small tubers grown in Germany. They had the same general com- position, the only difference being the presence of slightly more crude fiber and solids in the small than in the large tubers. The medium- sized tubers had more crude fiber than the large tubers but the same proportion of solids.

Appleman (2), who investigated the changes in Irish potatoes _ during storage, gives data on the moisture, total sugar, and starch contents.

Girard (272) in 1889 reported the changes taking place in tubers in France during growth. The sucrose content dropped from 1.48 to 0.02. per cent and the dextrose content from 0.67 per cent to none. Protein increased from 1.36 to 1.98 per cent, ash from 0.86 to 1.46 per cent, starch from 8.4 to 16.38 per cent, and cellulose from 0.84 to 1.66 per cent. The insoluble nitrogen dropped from 1.66 to 0.19 per cent and the insoluble ash from 0.16 to 0.06 per cent.

4 BULLETIN 1146, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

Pott (37) showed that the water content decreased, while the total nitrogen, starch, and crude fiber contents increased in the tubers as they matured. :

Prunet (39) considered that during growth the nutritive sub- stances are uniformly distributed in the tuber, but after full size has been reached there is a movement of these substances toward the apical buds.

Jones and White (24) in 1899 reported some experiments made on Delaware and White Star varieties of potatoes in Vermont. From analyses of tubers from both Bordeaux-sprayed and unsprayed plots, they concluded that the variations in yield were of more importance than variations in composition. The unsprayed tubers showed the presence of more water and ash than the sprayed tubers. As all of the tubers matured the solids and nitrogen-free extract decreased somewhat, while the ash, protein, and crude fiber increased slightly.

Stewart, Eustace, and Sirrine (46) im 1902 reported that one lot of tubers from Bordeaux-sprayed plants gave higher solids and starch results than a corresponding lot from unsprayed vines.

Woods (51) of the Maine station in 1919 published analyses show- ing that tubers from Bordeaux-sprayed potato vines averaged 19.1 per cent starch and that:tubers in the same field from unsprayed vines averaged 17.5 per cent starch. The dry matter in the tubers from the sprayed portions of the field was also 14 per cent higher than that in the tubers from the unsprayed portions.

PLANTS IN GENERAL.

Sorauer (45) observed that swellings were formed on the leaves of potato plants by the action of copper salts. Sections of these growths showed that they were composed of parenchyma cells so strongly hypertrophied as to break the epidermis.

Frank and Kriiger (79) in 1894 obtained a definite improvement in growth by treating potato plants with a 2 per cent Bordeaux spray. The effect of the copper was most marked on the leaves and was chiefly indicated by physiological activity rather than morphological changes. The leaves were thicker and stronger and their hfe was lengthened. The chlorophyll content was apparently increased and correlated with this was a rise in the assimilating capacity, more starch being formed. A rise in transpiration also occurred. <A sub- sidiary stimulation took place in the tubers, as the greater quantity of starch produced required space for its storage. The ratio of tuber formation on treated and untreated plants was 19:17 and 17:16. These investigators held that the action was catalytic, that is, an increase in photosynthesis resulted from the presence of copper.

Rumm (40) in 1895 noted that grape foliage sprayed with Bor- deaux showed thickened leaves of a blue-green color which outlived the leaves of the unsprayed vines. After measuring leaves from sprayed and unsprayed vines Rumm presented data showing that the thickness of the leaf, the epidermis, the palisade tissue, and the parenchyma was increased in the case of the sprayed vines. These data suggest that copper was taken into the growing leaf where it produced certain morphological changes.

Lodeman (32) found that the thickness of plum leaves and prune leaves was increased by the application of Bordeaux spray.

COPPER SPRAYS ON IRISH POTATO TUBERS. 5

Working with a large number of greenhouse plants, Zucker (52) concluded that plants sprayed with Bordeaux have greater resistance to etiolation than the unsprayed plants. The sprayed plants also showed an increase of chlorophyll and an increased power of assimi- lation, and their shoots lived longer. All of the sprayed plants transpired more than the unsprayed plants or those sprayed with lime alone.

Harrison (22) found that Bordeaux-sprayed plum, peach, and pear leaves were slightly thickened and that a marked development of chlorophyll granules occurred in their cells.

According to Chuard and Porchet (6), copper spray causes a slight increase in the sugar content of matured fruits. Injection of solutions of copper salts into the tissues of such plants as the grape- vine produced more vigorous growth, more intense color, and greater persistence of the leaves. ‘The copper seemed to act as a stimulant to all the cells of the organism. Other metals, such as cadmium and iron, are said to give a similar effect. Injecting small quantities of copper salts into the branches of a currant bush caused an acceler- ation in the maturation of the fruit identical with that obtained by the application of Bordeaux to the leaves. If the quantity of copper introduced into the vegetable organism was increased, the toxic action of the metal was brought into play. These investigators attribute the stimulus, as shown by the earlier maturation of the fruit, to a greater activity of all the cells of the organism and not to an excita- tion of the chlorophyll functions alone.

Treboux (49), in 1903, demonstrated the harmful effect of solu- tions of copper salts on leaves, measuring the activity of photosyn- thesis by a determination of the rate of emission of bubbles of oxygen.

Kanda (25) undertook to ascertain whether copper had a stimu- lating action on plants. He found that very small amounts of copper sulphate were toxic to peas grown in distilled water.

Schander (4/7) believes that the copper in a Bordeaux spray pene- trates the leaf to a very small extent, perhaps less than one in a hundred million parts, and that the copper there produces changes in assimilation and in transpiration. He considers that the shading effect of the Bordeaux spray on the leaves is beneficial to the absorp- tion of carbon dioxid.

Ewert (/7) states that in the morning Bordeaux-sprayed potato plants contain more starch than the unsprayed plants, not because ‘they are making more starch, but because they are unable to get rid of it as rapidly. The starch is piled-up in the chlorophyll bodies as the minute amount of copper absorbed checks the diastase action. Bordeaux spraying, shading the plants with cloth, and a combination _ of the two procedures diminish the yield of tubers. This author demonstrated by its effect on diastase that copper is present in the sprayed leaf in minute amount and concludes that the organic life of the plant is hindered rather than stimulated by the application of Bordeaux sprays.

Von Schrenk (50), working with cauliflower, also observed that See were formed on the leaves owing to the action of copper salts.

Amos (1) studied the effect of Bordeaux mixture on the assimila- tion of carbon dioxid by the leaves of plants to determine whether any

6 BULLETIN 1146, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

stimulation resulted. He found a diminished assimilation by the sprayed leaves for a time. This effect, however, gradually disap- peared. It is suggested that the stomata are blocked by the Bordeaux’ mixture, so that less air is diffused into the intercellular spaces and less carbon dioxid comes into contact with the absorption surfaces. This then is a mechanical and not a physiological action that reduces assimilation.

Duggar and Cooley (74) showed that potted potato plants when sprayed with Bordeaux transpire more water than unsprayed plants.

Duggar and Cooley (14), using potted potato plants, studied the effects of surface films on the rate of transpiration. The use of Bor- deaux and other films increased the rate of transpiration. The plants treated with weak Bordeaux (2-3-50) were in good condition at the close of the test, while those sprayed with stronger Bordeaux (4-6-50) showed injury from too much transpiration. These in- vestigators stated that it does not follow that the same results will be obtained in the open.

After measuring the cells of Bordeaux-sprayed and unsprayed potato leaves, Lutman (33) concluded that in general the leaves from the Bordeaux-sprayed plants had thicker palisade and pulp parenchymas than those from the check plants. He believed also that the number of chlorophyll bodies was increased in the sprayed leaves. An increased turgor is probably the immediate cause of these un- _ usually large cells. He considered that a small quantity of copper enters the leaf and that a chemical combination takes place between the chlorophyll and the copper. The chlorophyll is less easily re- moved from sprayed plants, showing that it has been rendered less soluble. Greenhouse tests and experiments conducted for one year in Germany by Lutman showed no stimulation effects. Lutman con- siders that in this country the physiological effects of Bordeaux on the potato are quite as important as its fungicidal effects. The physiological effect observed in Vermont is ascribed to lessened tip burn and flea-beetle injury and not to a stimulation and daily increase of starch formation as suggested earlier by him.

Edgerton (7/5) decided that Bordeaux apphed in Louisiana de- layed the ripening of tomatoes, while any increase in yield was un- certain. Pritchard and Clark (38) concluded that treatment with copper sprays increased the yield-of tomatoes in Virginia, Mary- land, Indiana, and New Jersey.

In some of Montemartini’s experiments (36) one side of a plant was sprayed while the other was not. Leaves sprayed in the morn- ing with dilute copper sulphate solution and removed and measured in the evening had a greater dry weight per unit area than the untreated leaves. When leaves were treated at night and removed in the morning they had a lower dry weight per unit area than the untreated leaves. According to Montemartini, these results indi- cate that the treatment stimulated the formation and translocation of organic matter. |

Ball (5) has definitely established the fact that the potato leaf- hopper causes “burning” of potato leaves, to which the term “hop- perburn” has been applied. He states also that it has long been recognized that spraying with Bordeaux mixture reduces tip burn, probably because it acts as a partial repellent against the leafhoppers.

COPPER SPRAYS ON IRISH POTATO TUBERS. 7

Dudley and Wilson (73) report that the potato leafhopper is one of the most important enemies of the potato in the United States. Bordeaux repels the leafhopper and therefore effectively controls the potato leafhopper and hopperburn. According to Fenton and Hartzell (78), the leafhopper can be effectively controlled and hop- perburn can be prevented by covering the potato plants with Bor- deaux spray. This spray keeps the adult insects from laying their eggs on the plants and kills many of the young insects.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE.

Three kinds of sprays containing copper were used in the experi- mental work reported here: (a) Ordinary Bordeaux spray, pre- pared by mixing milk of lime and copper sulphate solutions; (0d) Pickering spray, prepared by mixing a saturated solution of lime- water with a dilute solution of copper sulphate; and (c) a barium- water spray, prepared by mixing barium hydroxid with a dilute cop- per sulphate solution. These sprays are discussed fully in United States Department of Agriculture Bulletin 866.

The yield data were obtained from the two middle rows of a 4-row plot. Care was taken to select for these experiments plants which were as free as possible from late blight, mosaic, leaf roll, ete. The tubers from six plants receiving the same treatments were placed in a sack and immediately taken to the laboratory for analysis. For each analysis six medium-sized tubers were selected from the sam- ple and the analyses were made the day on which the tubers were dug. All of the samples were run through a Herles press which gives a very finely divided product. All determinations were made in duplicate, the average figures being recorded in the tables. With the exception of the 1921 data, which include detailed analyses, only solids, starch, and total nitrogen determinations are reported.

Solids, ash, insoluble ash, sugars, total nitrogen, and phosphorus were estimated by the methods of the Association of Official Agri- cultural Chemists (3). Starch was determined by the Herles method (23) which depends upon the conversion of the insoluble starch to a soluble starch by means of hydrochloric acid and a reading of the percentage of soluble starch in the polariscope. Copper (9) was estimated on 10 grams of the dried sample by the colorimetric pro- cedure, using potassium ferrocyanid. Soluble nitrogen, soluble phos- phorus, ammonia nitrogen, coagulable nitrogen, and nitrogen as monoamino and amid nitrogen were estimated on water extracts of the finely-divided samples of tubers as previously outlined by the writer (10). The pH data were obtained on the water extracts of the tubers, using the colorimetric procedure of Clark and Lubs (7).

RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL WORK. CHANGES IN COMPOSITION OF TUBERS DURING GROWTH.

During the season of 1921 tubers from four varieties of potatoes grown at Presque Isle, Me., were analyzed. Some of the plants had been sprayed with copper sprays, while others had not. The tubers were analyzed at various periods during their growth in order to determine when the influence of the copper sprays was exerted, and also to show the changes that take place in the composition of American-grown tubers during their development. These data are given in Table 1.

8

BULLETIN 1146, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

£9'°% GOL | T'8& | L°E | 2°68 66 °E v2T} 9°09 | 96 | L°L6 Go°% | bh | S'6L | F'F8 Oe 96° | 6°OF | L°TZ | 9°18 G'S 68'T | 9°48 | 0°& | 9°62 08 °s 18° | 8°@h | 9°02 | 1°62 eh 69° | O'°VE | 6°LT | 9°22 98 °% 69° | TSE | 6°3s | 6°08 OSes eecde mls by (6 ob8 GG °E 61'T | O°LE | T'b% | 1°S8 9% °E GO*T | =| 9'8s | G°LL 82 'P PZT | T'S | TSS | SLL 9% £E°T | 6°66 | 9'°2 | LOL 8I'b ZE°T | L°8E | BLS] | 8°26 06 °€ 69° | G°SE | €°0% | 0°26 PLS G8" | OTF | G°le | 2°98 68 °% | 0'OP | 0°82 | 0°98 £8" COT | ¥'08 | FOL | 8°68 OLE FOL | 8°08 | 6°LT | 8°L8 68 °€ 98° | 8°99 | [T'S | 8°68 0g "€ 88° | V9 | 8'F% | G'I6 08° ZIT | O'Tb | O'S | 9°98 8E°E Piee (et oh wie ales 88 °E 6I'T | se | 8°S% | 2°68 16 °€ OO'T | L°ZE | €'F% | 12s ol % Leas | RO Oty le Soya 60 °% CORD ECuOY i apie al eee i 00°¢ 98° | 6°Uh | 62 | I'b8 GLE POT | 2°88 | GLE | F°L8 98 °€ OFT | F998 | T°4E | 0°98 1S ° 06" | 4°88 | 2°88 | 1°S8 88 °T 16" | 9°93 | 0°8 | 2°69 10°% 60°T | L°SG | 66 | &°89 66 "2 ¥6'0 | FF | G'8 | 3°99 “Pid Pd \P'd |'29'd |\'P'd (-oqq | aru | PIPE?! -orq | ., ‘10qU) | -OUF |otrore| 281" nie bee “Uy -OU0TT, 30D pourar |—.

-10 sca —se uos

~O.1JTU 110} JO 038) U0010g

P00" | LOL’ | LOL’ | 266° | | 2°9 | 86 ¥P00* | OST* | PEO° | BSPE° | 9GE° | T°9 | LOL $200" | FOT® | €L0° | GLE" | BLE° |) 3°9 | OTT Ge00* | 6PL° | 640° | 262° | P9E" | 29 | Lb 0900" | GIT’ | 20° | 8%" | ZTE" | 0'9 | &6 200" | OZT* 190° | GE&Z° | 266° | 279 16 VZ00° | OZT° 690° | 666° | LVE* | 2°9 G"6 6200" | GIT” €10° | 892° | 61€° | FO 0O°TT $200" | FOL” |°°""~"| 086° | €83° 1 G9°9 | 86 9800" | GIL’ | €20° | 892° | 08° | F°9 | 9°OT 0€00° | 290" | 290° | 126° | 86° | €°9 -] 8°8 9800° | 020° | 490° | F2Z° | 066° | €°9 | 6°8 OF00* | 060° | 890° | TES" | TOE’ | 9 | O'8 800" | TPT” TOL’ | 9€E° | H9E* | T°9 | EB 9200° | Set” 910° | SPE" | GLE" | 9 | Sok 9Z00° | ZOL° | P80° | 96° | SOE’ | €°9 | LOL 800° | OZL° P80° | 892° | OOF" | G9 8 IT 0€00° | 280° L¥O* | LSZ° | 98° |---| BOL 800° | S60° GGO° | 693° | 808° |---| 86 9¢00° | ZZT° €10° | LZ" | 08° | €°9 TOL 8200" | OSL° | 640° | 262° | 6BTE° | €°9 | 6°8 0£00° | ZIT * 290° | OFZ" | 696° | F°9 €°ST. vs00° | PEL’ | °° °°") 96° | 166° | ¥'9 L°9t 0€00° | F80° G90° | 932° | 92° | €°9 SI 8Z00° | 060° 890° | O&Z"° | 086° | €°9 9°TL FH00* | PET° | | 98S" | 0'9 | 68 TANOUS GASH Mer Wiel they | teretes HO) 8) ff £3 CO! 0£00° | 6FT” OL” | 266° | LVE* | O'°9 8°OL 8Z00° | FOL’ TOL’ | GSEZ* | 693° | €°9 | O'OL Or00* | OT” 9OT* | 9FZ° | 986° | F'9 GOL 9200° | ZIT° SIL* | 9FZ° | 686° | G9 86 LZ00° | 9L0° | €20° | 86E° | 983° | o°9 | 8ST €¢00° | 820° 080° | L0%° | £08" | 2°9 FPL 000 ‘0} 820°O | 220 °0| G12 0} 6TE"O} 2°9 GEL Pod \ PCD VD d | Pod | Pd ‘Prd . “prure | . ‘oTqn sae | BEY ta | ora Log | cary |Ourure Spur |I08 | PP L-go8s9 |st gem V |-ouoy [2°09 -xo | yse 1092M |[8409 JO joHd) uory -1od “(N) WosOIIN -O1d

G80" | 26° 680° *} 18° 180° | 64° 60° | 26° 880° | G6° 260° | 10°T [60° | 00°T 840° | TL° 990° | TL° €20° | 69° ¥LO* | 080° | 06° ¥LO* | 26° LLO* | €6° €40° | 86° 980° | $8° 860° | €8° 860° | 16° 660° | 76° LLO* | 91° OL0* | 62° SEle 28) LET” | 68° 90T* | 98° 80L* | 68° 80° | 96° COL” | 66° OOT* | 86° T80° | 18° 180° | €8° 980° | L8° LVL” | €6° LET* | G6" 821 0} 26 °0 Pid | "Pd “ysB

eTqn | “qsVv -[osuy

OARS S TT AIR SIGE Sr 3s SSS 4333-9

WHANSSSSASHANASAHBHSSSSSKHSHS 1 ol

: Papen Serie

i it

: ui

ree |

Ses

| Sessa sss SS SSS eS ee

Sc re |

SOMDDAHNOCAMHANTBMOGOR ON Vs DO NBA ONYHONAOMOONoO

* ~ 1

“O1)Ba

O€ “GI 08 “ET 06 ST 08 "ST 09 FT 08 ZI 08 ‘PT 0G GI OL “GL 08 “IT GO ‘OT 06 °6

08 "8

GP VT 08 “ST OF “ZI GL Or GG "6

OF TT GT “ST 09 “I 08 ‘OL G8 OL GZ °8

02 6

06 “ST 06 ‘ST 08 9L 09°TT 0L°0T OF ZI GZ "6

09 °6

[6 °6

‘Pid

89 °LT LG 61 T8 "81 GL 0G 98 0% G9 ‘ST €8 "06 60 ‘8T PY 8ST TL ‘LT 68 “OT 08 ‘LT €6 “FT Laaks 6F °2% V9 ‘81 06 ‘8T 6L “OL b9 81 82 61 LL’81 bP FL LO LT G0 "OT 86 OL 98 ‘02 98 °0Z L9 "GG OL ‘81 8% 8 9L/8T T@°ST 99 °ST GL°9L ‘Pid

"7" ""09GD 7” [P3f01N ~“BUTIONOL “"- TONIeg, “xnvop.10 gq ee 2:18) “* TONTICg, pe 02! (0) “-“BULIOMOLT *Xlvo p10 ¢F mee: 0:2! (0) --- TINIe “xneop.10 g, "7" * "90D “xXNeop.10¢, “7 "39900 "xXNBOP.10 g, ee C2! (@) “xnvopl0g,

~**""00qO “xnvop10g,

-xnvopl0g, “75 **x99TD “xnvopi10 g, ee 0)! 10) ~“SUTIONOL “xneop.0g, eee 1! (0) ~“BUTIOO, - XNBOpP10 , ree O21! (6) ~“SUTIOOT " xnvop.10g,

“OY | YouRyg] “sprpog|"yuouryeoI,

Te’ |-ops: $Z° |-op7* spe [top™* les |rop-- 99° *90B1} Lg° 9T* 0g" 10° 8P° 90° 99° IT’ $G° IT’ LIT | 13° Ol'T | 08° CS al eGGw oS ° ¥0° 62° S0° OL'T | LT 16° 8T° BEL | 6h" GIT | 62° 1g 60° 69° L0° cL" tT° 91° GT ° CLL | 88. OS*T | 63° ge° |-“ ops: Pee ie ED er Ler 0B} GOL | $2" 96° 02° 06° OL’ IPE |} [9° 82°T | 88° FOL | 68°0 Pid | Pid *9S014 4 -xop 98019 | op airy -ng -onp *sIBdng

"LO6L “ane ‘asy anbsaig ‘syunj)d oynj0d pahnudsun pun pahipads mouf siaqn, U0 vIDg—"T TTAV J,

plate nie aOu ale ain iris ese SECIIOL CS9) 0/ Ra PSIG Cty n HC 1 ribs sis Maren hte ore dof > Pegs O tyne ee Pe cD cements nse SIE 00 fof nha SEI CISC OI HOM TRACI IAA (gy aH FE TOS G0 GE BROCE GLO yop elo BDO OCC | -tatn Te ““UTBIJUNOP, U9.) IFC TIC (gH 9 FA" BRC Crp 9 DEI COD ITGLY 9} ob. ROE (yey

“50m ALI lo Sada cbr His SPREE onc Lait diene beg gates et es:

SEY 9)

[aa OSOe}

L8H

SBUDOOCCCeoT op?

wetness ee eeergTyecess we cer eceeeeeg nesses woe eeseeeresgpecsss soe eteceseeegnessss

“"="-JeTqqoO WSUT | 9%

"AQOLIC A

COPPER SPRAYS ON IRISH POTATO TUBERS. 9

The proportion of solids in most cases showed a gradual increase during the growth of the tubers. With the exception of the Green Mountain sample, the proportion of solids was higher in the tubers from copper-sprayed plants than in those from the unsprayed plants at the time of the first analysis, that is, when the tubers were less than an inch in diameter. This indicates that the effect of the copper was exerted very early in their development.

The solids for all the tubers from the Bordeaux-sprayed plants averaged 18.63 per cent; for all those from the unsprayed plants, 17.87 per cent; for all those from barium-water-sprayed plants, 19.58 per cent; and for all those from Pickering-sprayed plants, 18.29 per cent.

The following average ash figures were obtained for all the samples analyzed: Tubers from unsprayed vines, 0.87 per cent; tubers from Bordeaux-sprayed plants, 0.88 per cent; and tubers from Pickering- sprayed plants, 0.85 per cent. The percentage of the total ash found as insoluble ash decreased in most cases during the growth of the tubers.

The pH data obtained on the water extracts of the tubers showed no significant change.

The proportion of total nitrogen, which increased during the growth of all four varieties of tubers, was somewhat higher for the tubers from copper-sprayed plants than for those from the un- sprayed plants. The percentage of nitrogen was higher for the tubers from copper-sprayed plants than for those from the unsprayed plants at the time of the first analyses, showing again that the action of the copper on the metabolic activities of the plant was exerted very early.

The percentage of insoluble nitrogen in the tubers showed a tend- ency to decrease during growth. The percentage of soluble nitrogen increased during growth. The percentage of coagulable nitrogen increased during growth-in the case of the Irish Cobbler, the Early Ohio, and the Early Rose varieties, but not in the Green Mountain variety. The monoamino and amid nitrogen, which includes the nitrogen not precipitated by phosphotungstic acid, showed a marked increase for all four varieties during growth. The average per- centage was slightly higher in the tubers from copper-sprayed plants than in those from the unsprayed plants. The ammonia nitrogen content showed no regular change. |

During tuber development the percentage of starch increased some- what more rapidly than the percentage of solids. A larger percent- age of starch was usually found in the tubers from copper-sprayed plants from the first analysis to the last than in the check tubers. The average data for the content of starch in the tubers were: Bor- deaux-sprayed, 12.24 per cent; check, 11.73 per cent; barium-sprayed, 12.67 per cent; and Pickering-sprayed, 12.36 per cent.

The sugars,,.calculated as dextrose and sucrose, were present in the young tubers in relatively large proportions. At the time the tubers had reached maturity the dextrose had practically disappeared and the quantity of sucrose had markedly decreased. The unsprayed tubers of the three early varieties contained a higher percentage of sugars in the first stages of development and usually a lower per- centage at maturity than the tubers from copper-sprayed plants.

27475 °—23——_2

10 BULLETIN 1146, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

This means that the copper sprays may in some way accelerate the transformation of sugar to starch during the active stages of growth. The Green Mountain tubers did not show this tendency. The ratio of sugars to starch decreased greatly during growth, the percentage of sugars decreasing while the percentage of starch increased. The ratio of sucrose to dextrose increased during the growth of the tubers, the dextrose practically disappearing at maturity. At the time the first and second analyses were made the three early varieties of potatoes contained a higher percentage of dextrose plus sucrose than the late variety (Green Mountain). This higher sugar content may be characteristic of early varieties and may be associated with the rapid growth which these varieties make. The unsprayed tubers, with the exception of the Green Mountain, usually showed a higher ratio of sugar to starch than the tubers from the copper-sprayed plants.

It is evident that marked changes take place in the potato during development. Apparently these changes are influenced in some way by the copper sprays, higher percentages of solids, starch, and nitrogen usually following the application of copper sprays to potato vines.

These data may be of value in determining when a potato is mature. It appears that the sugar to starch ratio, as suggested by Appleman (2), as well as the ratio of protein to amid nitrogen and | the percentage of total nitrogen as amid nitrogen, is of value. The percentage of starch in terms of total solids may be used. Appar- ently certain changes in the ash constituents may be applied to solve the question.

EFFECT OF COPPER SPRAYS ON YIELD AND COMPOSITION OF TUBERS.

1917 AND 1918 DATA (MAINE).

In 1916 and again in 1917 potato plants which received copper sprays gave higher yields than those which received no copper spray. It was therefore thought that the copper sprays might influence the eomposition of the tubers as well as the yield. Late blight was severe in 1917 in this locality but was slight in 1916 and 1918. Dur- ing the season of 1917 Green Mountain potatoes were sprayed at Presque Isle, Me., using 5-5-50 Bordeaux, Pickering sprays contain- ing various amounts of copper, and a barium-water-copper-sul phate spray containing 0.7 per cent of copper sulphate. Duplicate deter- minations for solids were made on four samples of tubers from (a) 5-5-50 Bordeaux-sprayed vines (1.25 per cent copper sulphate) ; (6) Pickering-sprayed vines (0.64 per cent copper sulphate); and (¢) unsprayed vines grown in the same field. All of the vines were sprayed seven times during the season, lead arsenate being used on all of the plants.

The four samples of tubers from the Bordeaux-sprayed vines averaged 21.45 per cent solids; those from the Pickering-sprayed vines, 21.49 per cent solids; and those from the check vines, 20.65 per cent solids. Similar results were obtained with this variety of potatoes in Maine during the season of 1918.

COPPER SPRAYS ON IRISH POTATO TUBERS. ids 1919 DATA.

Arlington Experimental Farm, Va—The 1919 experiments at the Arlington Experimental Farm of the Department of Agriculture were conducted on the Early Rose and Irish Cobbler varieties of potatoes. All plots were sprayed four times, lead arsenate being applied to both unsprayed and copper-sprayed plots. The field was uniformly fertilized, using 4-8-4 mixture which was applied at the rate of 1,200 pounds to the acre. The tubers were analyzed the day they were dug.

TABLE 2.—Yield and composition of tubers from copper-sprayed and unsprayed (check) potato plants, Arlington Experimental Farm, 1919.

Yield

from

Variety. Treatment. 2rows, | Solids. |Nitrogen.

each 100

feet long. Pounds. | Per cent. | Per cent. Early Rose.....-.-- Nolcopperispray: (checks)\= suo; sasieeos casts aaeieioreyt= 50.0 13. 96 0. 293 Don seseeh! it Bordeaux 4-4-50 (1 per cent copper sulphate)......-. 87.6 14. 30 -272 DO eeeo css eet Pickering spray (0.5 per cent copper sulphate).-...-- 90.3 15. 83 ~325 Trish Cobbler !-.--. INOICOPPErSprayalCHeCk:)a- seman eee nie sc sees ane 124.0 16. 41 - 346 100) Aes 82 ees ease Bordeaux 4-4-50 (1 per cent copper sulphate).--...-- 134.0 18.14 .347 JU eee eae | Pickering spray (0.5 per cent copper sulphate)..-...- 123.0 18. 57 . 364

1 Average of 3 determinations given in each case.

The data in Table 2 indicate that the copper sprays increased the yield for the Early Rose variety and the solids content of tubers of both varieties in a locality where late blight is unknown and where Bordeaux or other copper sprays are not employed generally.

Seven States—The yield and composition of tubers from Bor- deaux-sprayed and unsprayed plants in seven States (Virginia, Maine, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey) are recorded in Table 3. The analytical data are average figures for 62 samples. Data for Pickering-sprayed plots are included with the Arlington Experimental Farm results. The tubers analyzed were from sprayed and unsprayed potato plants grown in the various States under the direction of plant pathologists and were sent to the writer by express the day on which they were dug. Arsen- ical sprays were used on all plots. |

The average increase in yleld per acre of potatoes was 25 per cent. The average increase of solids in the tubers was from 20.77 per cent, in the tubers from the check plots, to 21.99 per cent in those from Bordeaux-sprayed plants, an increase of 5.9 per cent. The average ficures for pounds of solids of the tubers per acre were 2,591 for the noncopper-sprayed and 3,430 for the copper-sprayed plants, an aver- age increase of 32.4 per cent or 48 bushels, due apparently to the use of copper sprays. It is important to note that the tubers from Virginia, Maine, and Minnesota, where practically no late blight occurred, showed the same general results as those from the other four States, where more or less late blight was noted. This means that prevalence of late bhg@ht was apparently not the important factor or necessarily a factor at all. The potato plants grown in

BULLETIN 1146, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

12

“yued Jed Gz ‘e108 10d pyotd Jo oSvoIOUT OdB10A V

“yuoeseid ting diy pue yqsI[Tq ATIvO ST}VIT] V “sishteur o10joq SAep fF 10 ¢ 1OJ VIQUINTOD JO JOIIASIC, ULBBi0}S Ul pues ‘SyooM Z 10J YNOTOOUUOD Wi sVT[90 UT Pyoy Si0qny, “OTe [eIoyouod Aue jJ10xe pynoo Avids oy o10JOq “VST 972] MLOJJ WOSVES OY} UT ATIve potp SsoutA poAvids pus xooyo oy} [TV

"2490 ysory Aq porDT ‘peryystq ATYSTS sour A "1 °YO 4sorj Aq, porPy ‘poyystq, Ajo} esopour sour A

“snp moyA 1YsTq oVe[ uULOIy peop Aprvou ‘eT “ydog poe yystd SOULA | “ATIVE PIIp PUB FYSITG o4V[ TSS pey SourA *ATICO POIP PUB IST 0B] 91OAOS PLY SOUTA *yuoeseid 4YysTTq Ou ‘816, Jo doso pofkeads wWLoOIJ poos “yuesoid 4YsITq 08] OU ‘816 JO do1o poAvidsun Mo01J poss “4so.1j Aq ZT “4deg porly Te “VysTIq Jo soovs4 T “ydog soqye ‘yojd soyy1o Uo { ‘Ydog [HUN yYsTTq oe] ON

*SOUTA pofvidsun 10 poXeaids oy} Jo Aue uo yueseid yysTq oye, ON

*syued Jo UOT}Ipuod UO syAvUTE

169%

£8

‘spunog |"spunog |’

‘9108 Jod |'o10@ 10d sr9qny. JOSPT[OS] JO pfolA

SLE ‘FT 86P ‘TI

G1z‘G

sueqn

6E ° her

Th 98 © 98° OF * 8E° he

GE

ae £60

"ued + | -ony1N

66 "TZ

LL ‘0G

06 “8T 09 “ST.

bP ‘0G 26 "0G

T9 “Se GE “GS

66 "86 60 "GG 68 ‘04 6L 6S GZ “61 96 ‘96 GO “9% 68 LT ST LT

08 “GT.

JU90 Lag |\"quW90 ad

“SPHOS

-- > -pekeads xnvop.i0 g, ----(sooyo) poAeidsug,

--- -poefeids xnvopi0 gq

“---(so0ya) poseidsug

"== “nefeids xnvep10g.

~"=-(oeyo) poxeadsuyy ‘(ssutheads

9) pofeids xnvopi0g, e' (SsutAeids

¢) poseids xneopiog

“**-(spooyo) pokvadsug, “== -pekeids xneep.0 g, “7--(yooypo) paferdsug --- “pefeids xnvepi0g, “---(yooyo) peAvidsuy --* “pofeids xnvop10 | “---(yooto) poAvadsuy, --+, pofevaids SuLIeyoi g ---- pefvids xnvepi0g

-*--(yoayo) pokerdsug | pur

“qusUTY VOLT,

‘OSCIOAV UI POPNPOUT 10M SITNSoyy ¢g VURID UWROTIOULY JO 9 PUL JOTYqoOO Yst1y JO Sejdures ¢ jo soskteur ojvaedes Joy SoNSy OStIOAY g i “SOIJOLIVA Z OY} JO Sojdures Jo Jequinu [eubo ue jo sosAjeue o7e1GdOS JO SosLIOAL O1B TIOATS SOINSIT 1

a ————————————— nw ee. LLL LE LL, 4100 Jed F°zE ‘0108 10d SpT[OS JO oSvoIOUTOSBIOAY | OE ‘S

opt.-* Si aasanie re Pitie Sete ioe OSRIOAV

“{UBLD WROLIOULY pue ,deqqog YsTy

“JOSSNyy eqgiq pus ‘urnu -Og, WMNUSeT, S,19009

opt ‘asoyy sutpyedg

rte[qqo) = YSsty

*AQOTIC A

IT Te Cee Agsio¢ MON 8 en Co mU0D ‘eure, “4 G G Gra. neon gaciseene ACN ‘Wg, T HPht eq ‘esaTJon 04%49 a (ee ARBs abe uUUuTN “Neg 4g 1 ee oe OW ‘esp onbsei J i a4 "eA ULI Te } -usted xy uOysUT IY “pozA] -BUe sotd -ULes ‘goIno0g jo J9q “Tan. N

“616L ‘sanig wares wouf syunjd o7nj,0d yooyo pun pafinsds-saddoo wouf suaqny fo uoyrsod woo pun pjavX —'G AIA J,

COPPER SPRAYS ON IRISH POTATO TUBERS. 13

Connecticut were well infected with late blight before any Bordeaux

spray was applied. All the plants died early; consequently, it is not surprising that the tubers showed no effect of the Bordeaux spray, probably because they were formed before the first spray was applied and were therefore too far advanced to derive any benefit from the sprays. The New Jersey results for solids were not higher for the tubers from the copper-sprayed than for those from the unsprayed plants in the case of all samples examined, although the average figures were higher for the tubers from the Bordeaux-sprayed plants. A discussion of the use of Bordeaux spray on potatoes in New Jersey by Lint (30) is interesting in this connection. He considers the cli- mate, cultivation, and fertility of the field to be important factors in determining to what extent Bordeaux is beneficial to the potato. <Ac- cording to this author, Bordeaux prolongs the life of the vines and affords the best control of fiea beetle, although increased yield of tubers does not consistently result from the application of Bordeaux to potato plants in New Jersey.

It has been the writer’s experience that an occasional sample of tubers from a check plot will run higher in solids, starch, and nitrogen ~ than a sample from a Bordeaux- or other copper-sprayed plot. This is the exception to the rule, however, and may be due to the inclusion among the tubers selected for analysis of a potato or several potatoes that are not hard and firm. Sometimes one of the tubers in a hill is a little softer than the rest, probably because the food supply has been limited or checked in some way. In work of this kind average figures are undoubtedly the only criterion.

1920 DATA.

Arlington Experimental Farm, Va—tin the spring of 1920 experi- ments were carried out at Arlington Experimental Farm, using Irish Cobbler, Early Ohio, and Early Rose varieties of potatoes. Spald- ing Rose, Gold Coin, Irish Cobbler, and McCormick potatoes were grown in the fall. A 44-50 Bordeaux spray, a Pickering spray, a 10-10-50 Bordeaux, and a 0-4—50 spray were used. The check plots and all the copper-sprayed plots received a lead arsenate spray. The figures reported in Table 4 are the averages for 53 sets of tubers separately analyzed. ;

TABLE 4.—Yield and composition of tubers from sprayed. and unsprayed potato plants, Arlington Experimental Farm, Va., August and October, 1920.

| Yield Composition of tubers. j from Variety. Treatment. 2 rows,

each 100 | solids. | Starch. | Nit feet long. : tarch. itrogen. Early potatoes (August): Pounds. | Per cent.| Per cent. | Per cent. Trish Cobbler }....... A-4-5O"Bordeaw® ) 585050 ook See Oe 357 19. 91 14, 20 0.372 IDSC see eee Check, (olcop per) Bxn.sc schoo os 321 19, 59 13. 70 . 368 1D be ema IPICKCLING SULA Veen eine cee cece 340 20. 64 14. 50 - 383 ines ee 10-10-50 Bordeaux. -:.............-. 341 20. 42 14. 70 . 367 1) 3 SU See 0-4-50 spray (No copper)..-..-.....-.- 350 19. 85 13. 90 356 a Olea ss: 4-4-50 Bordeaux... 2..2...2...0200-- 217 19.17 13. 90 412 Oe sews Chock (noicoppen)i- cose ee 216 19. 28 13. 90 - 410 Deere. 5225. iPickerins Spray reeeeeraee see aoe eee 211 19, 44 14. 70 . 433 ar! ase *e0ss. 52-)4=4-50 Bordeaux - soi iel ites. oe .c 245 20.18 14, 38 . 367 OP re Wie ce oe. Check @.0:copper) aes 2 2 228 18. 97 13. 60 -326 ot Seiten wooo Pickering Spray sedssoee sees. eee 229 20. 86 14, 83 364

1 Average of 2 sets. 2 Average of 4 sets.

14 BULLETIN 1146, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

TABLE 4.—Yield and composition of tubers from sprayed and unsprayed potato plants, ete—Continued.

Yield Composition of tubers. from Variety. Treatment. 2 TOWS, ieatlan Solids. | Starch. | Nitrogen. Late potatoes (October): Pounds. | Per cent. | Per cené. | Per cent. Spalding Rose....... 0-4-50 spray (Mo copper)....-..------ 153 19. 36 16. 80 0. 406 DO? | 9 hes ces Pickering spraye eo aeecie. tes 5243 221 21.48 19. 20 397 ID OF eee ee eee 44-50 Bordeaux... ...-2..--.-2-2--- 250 Qa eds eae . 430 DOSES Seen a poet Check @Moicoppen)a-setean 2 ene 248 1OF8Psig sh. Pee! . 409 Goldi@oine= =~ x.55-- 4-450 Bordealixcr ae. 35. e aes a 242 22. 09 17.00 - 485 ID Ose aera 0-4-50 spray (no copper) -..-----.---- 232 PALS wal eee Seated 461 IDO 2s Stick 53 Pickering Sprays. 2 jack sec ee Pee 296 23. 80 17. 90 . 457 DO see reene tees Check (m0 COppeEyis-5 ees. =-< soe 294 19. 52 14. 50 444 Trish Cobbl CS) ripe oe 44-50 Bordeaux......-....--------- 303 22. 69 17. 20 . 443 Bot te Bae 0-4-50 spray (no copper)..---------- 245 20. 14 15.13 . 400 Do 1 See ooe eee 10=10—50 Bordeatixess- 22 22 1 ee 291 22. 43 17,15 - 444 DO F265) hes. 48 Pickeringispray =. 2. saaee ec aa aaes 261 21. 92 16. 73 -443 DO ree eae ee Check: (0) copper) s- 6-2 ee eee 288 20. 66 15. 68 . 429 MeCormick? = _ =... - Cheek /(mo copper) & 2 5c 2522-46 245 21. 72 15. 85 430 DOr ee Pe Q-4-50 spray (mo copper) ------------ 237 21. 36 15. 50 419 ID Orisa. eet Pickerine Sprayecoete a see ee ee 259 21. 88 15. 90 - 456 ID Ope ee Ee cress 2 44-50 Bordeaux ..-....2...---.------ 241 21. 32 15. 50 . 436 1B) Oe een LO=10=500B ord cai. eee oe eee 226 21.47 15. 75 . 457 - 1Average of 2 sets. 2A verage of 3 sets.

The 10-10-50 Bordeaux spray showed no particular advantages over the 44-50 Bordeaux spray or the Pickering spray in either the early or late tests. The vines receiving the 0-4—50 spray, which con- _ tained no copper but did contain lime, usually showed yield results lower than those of the checks, but the results of the analyses of the tubers usually agreed rather closely with those obtained for tubers from the check plants. The yield data are variable, but on an aver- age are higher for the copper-sprayed than for the check plants. The data for solids, starch, and nitrogen are generally higher for the copper-sprayed than for the lime-sprayed or check plants. This indicates that copper is the essential constituent of the spray.

Maine, New York, New Jersey, and Penns yloania. —Thirty-three samples of tubers from Bordeaux-sprayed plants from Maine, Penn- sylvania, and New Jersey and from Bordeaux-sprayed and Bordeaux- dusted and unsprayed potato vines in New York (Table 5) were examined. All of the plants were sprayed with an arsenical. San- der’s Bordeaux dust was used. The sprays and dusts were applied five times during the season.

TABLE 5.—Composition of tubers from sprayed and unsprayed potato plants, Maine, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, 1920.

Composition of tubers.

Source. Variety. Treatment.

Solids. | Starch. | Nitrogen.

Per cent. Per cent. | Per cent.

Mame: 2222.5 se irishiCobbler:- 5-e2----- 5-5-50 Bordeaux...-......-- 3 20K4 15.9 0. 367

1D Oe ee a 2 ee Goss eS See Check (no copper).........-- 18. 39 13. 80 -o08

DOR sees 8 nae Spalding Rose....-...... 5-5-50 Bordeaux .-.-...2..:. 18. 23 13. 80 . 356 IDO 2 ose ae SRS ee GOs at ee Check (no copper)..-........- 18.13 13. 95 319

DO 255555288e iMeCormick. 22-3: esas eeo- 5-5-50 Bordeaux.-.-.......- 21.70 16. 80 . 371

DO oe ee ees GOS Bes Sele ee Check (no copper)..........- 20. 91 16. 00 - 356 DOSS SSF Se Marly, Hoseteo: J-hee eee 5-5-50 Bordeaux. .--....-.:- 21. 65 17. 00 sol6 =

DORE e es oes GOR acetic su ceeee Check (mo copper)........... 21. 93 16. 95 . 339

“4 a

COPPER SPRAYS ON IRISH POTATO TUBERS. 15

TABLE 5.—Composition of tubers from sprayed and unsprayed potato plants, Maine, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, 1920—Continued.

Composition of tubers.

Source. Variety. Treatment.

Solids. | Starch. | Nitrogen. Per cent. | Per cent. | Per cent. Pennsylvania....| Blight Proof ..-.-.....-- 5-5-50 Bordeaux............ .5 20. 0. 395 1D Tis Soe eee el eee Oe ee ees Check (no copper).......-..- 21. 92 17. 30 . 353 Gee est | Dibble Russet........... 5-5-50 Bordeaux........-.-- 21.79} 16.75 362 1) ee ae ee a Ko Geena SE eine tees Check (no copper)....---.--- 23. 36 18. 53 . 334 Dore es wee Blight Proof Union Co..| 5-5-50 Bordeaux...........- 24, 42 21. 04 . 340 12a ee OM ee a aie Check (no copper)......--.-- 19. 80 15. 20 . 363 New Jersey...... American Giants!....-. 44-50 Bordeaux...........- 18. 20 12.73 - 334 1D Yaya cyie ee Sees 2] 8 EN 6 Voy Dis te one te ky Sema Check (no copper)..........- 18. 33 12: 35 . 290 New=sY Ork- 22... Variety 9 (Wilkes)...-.. 44-50 Bordeaux.........-.- 23. 12 19. 50 274 Dip ae ese. 125 2. dows 5 Sarees ee Bordeaux dust...........-.. 22. 96 19. 00 311 DOr cue as c| ao... -% GOs ee Ae Check (no copper)......--.-- 23. 16 19. 10 . «297 1) oe ee Variety 9 (White)....... 4-4-50 Bordeaux.........-.- 22.74 18. 60 412 IDO, Ree er ees Goss) fries Seo se iB Ordeatex GuSit G5. ose cose 22. 74 18. 40 - 403 WOME nae cc lEe nee don 2 Wate Seen Check (no copper)..........- 22. 35 18. 20 . 367

1D ace Heavyweight (Kd- Wards) 252 eee ase IBOLdealixs GuSteesee acess 23. 80 18. 90 - 401 IDO as ae GO Ui a: ees aha Check (no copper)........--. PATE 17.30 - 356 DORSs see << Goldson'e J sseeeek=s 4-4-50 Bordeaux............ 28. 16 22. 30 - 455 ID) eee et ee ar GOssre see eae IBOLdealxGUSt leet see seen ee 26. 42 21. 00 - 478 ID On ee eee, Cc fo Me Ce Peer ae Check (no copper).......-..- 26. 62 21.40 - 416 IDO) oR ee (en i RT UTS EP a a 44-50 Bordeaux...........- 24. 03 19. 60 - 230 IDO SA cee eee nea a aearcs Ser sty a Check (no copper).-....-..-- 20. 34 15. 40 . 280 DD Ona sis5 22 =: Dibble Russet (Slayton). Bordeaux dust............-- 27.61 22.75 348 LD eee ers GOSS see eee Check (no copper)........--- 27.37 22. 80 347

i Average of 2 sets.

For the New York data several varieties of potatoes grown near Bath and one variety from Geneva were analyzed. From the limited number of samples tested it is impossible to state definitely whether Bordeaux dust tas the same favorable effect on the potato plant as Bordeaux spray has, although the results in Table 5 are not par- ticularly favorable to the dust, with the exception of those for the Heavyweight variety. Average figures for three sets grown in New York gave 24.67 per cent of solids for tubers from Berdeaux-sprayed plants, 24.04 per cent for tubers from Bordeaux-dusted plants, and 24.04 per cent for tubers from unsprayed plants. The average starch results for these three sets are 20.13 per cent for tubers from plants recelving Bordeaux spray, 19.47 per cent for those from plants treated with Bordeaux dust, and 19.57 per cent for those from the check plants. The average nitrogen data for the three sets are: Tubers from Bordeaux-sprayed plants, 0.88 per cent; tubers from Bordeaux-dusted plants, 0.397 per cent; and tubers from unsprayed. plants, 0.36 per cent. Comparing all five dusted plots with the five corresponding checks gives an average of 24.71 per cent solids against 24.24 per cent, and comparing all four Bordeaux-sprayed plots an average of 24.51 per cent solids against 23.12 per cent for the checks. In general, the results for the New York tubers were higher when Bordeaux spray was used than when no spray was used.

Data were secured for four varieties of potatoes grown in Maine, two varieties from Pennsylvania, one variety having been grown in two different places, and one variety from New Jersey. Three of the four samples of tubers from Maine were higher for Bordeaux and they averaged 20.51 per cent solids from the Bordeaux-sprayed plants and 19.84 per cent from the check plants. Two of the three sets of tubers from Pennsylvania were higher for the Bordeaux

16 BULLETIN 1146, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

samples and the average solids content for the three sets was 93.92

per cent from the Bordeaux-sprayed plants, as compared with 21.69 per cent for the tubers from the check vines. The two samples of the American Giant variety from New Jersey had practically the same content of solids and the tubers from the Bordeaux-sprayed vines had but slightly higher contents of starch and nitrogen.

The average results for the tubers from the four States show that the general effect of the copper sprays is to increase the solids content of the tubers.

1921 DATA,

Presque Isle, Me—The 1921 experiments were conducted at

Presque Isle, Me., to determine the influence of Bordeaux, Pickering, _and barium-water sprays, all containing copper, on the yield of tubers. The data were compared with data obtained from check or noncopper-sprayed plants in each case. All of the plants received an arsenical spray.

TABLE 6.—Yield from 3 varieties of potatoes, Presque Isle, Me., 1921.

| Front plots. Rear plots. Variety. WIRE fe 80 wae ete ie Rk (ar eg ee ETS Flot | spray used rield.a | Flot Spray used Yield | - } |

Aroostook farm: Pounds | Pounds Pounds.

Early Rose..... 2 | Bordeaux..-.-....- 2128 1 | Check (no copper)... 2107 |=255.-

Early Ohio..... 7 = ee deascr) Gs5 me 2106 Seeks d022. Ase 2\995}5-6- 238

Trish Cobbler...| 5A | Check (no copper)... 868 | 5B-|..<.- it eee eee eee: 724 1,592

13 3 as eee 6 | Bordeaux.......... 864 7 | Pickering -.....-....| 780 1,644

en Moun- | 8A | Check (nocopper).-| 1,020} 8B | Check (mocopper)... 821 1,841 in.

Doss4- =: 9 | Bordeaux......-... 1,070 tO 3} Baran: . 53s). Sse 850 1, 920

Dos 11A | Pickering.........- 1,046 | 11B |....- do ee eee 909 1,955

Kneeland farm: Ggeen Moun-| 1A | Bordeaux.......... 7234. 1B), Bordeaux 52-7 355. 636 2,751 ain.

DOs sss. 2A | Proprietary spray-.- 63 2B | Proprietary spray... 707 2, 682

DOs se ee 3A | Check (no copper).. 583 | 3B | Check (no copper)... 532 2,376

Dore Ss 3C | Barium spray....-- 671 | 3D {| Bariumspray...-..-- 733 | 2,859

Dine ae 4A | Bordeaux.-........ 732.| -4B | Bordeaux -:_......:- 660 |.--..--.-

Doo 2 FACT Pickerme 2225 _s oe 664 | 5B | Pickering........... 716 | 2,760

Bey = 27 sae 6A | Check (no copper)... 648 | 6B | Check (no copper)... G13,|- etic

1 DY ees 6C | Barium spray..-.-- 744 | 6D | Barium spray-....... Tih ie eee

Wot. eee! 7A | Proprietary spray. - 625 | 7B | Proprietary spray-..! TEISK CE Ste i

1 Yield from 2 rows, 300 feet long, in case of Aroostook farm potatoes; yield from 2 rows, 225 feet long, in case of Kneeland farm potatoes.

2 Yields from 50 hills each.

8 Yield from 2 plots in case of Aroostook farm; yield from 4 plots in case of Kneeland farm.

From the data from the Aroostook farm and from the Kneeland farm (Table 6) it is evident that the copper-sprayed plants generally gave an increased yield of tubers. In 1921 there was no late blight (Phytophthora infestans) in northern Maine. The reason for using copper sprays in this locality is to control this fungus. Increased yields seem to follow the application of these sprays in seasons when no late blight was prevalent.

PROPORTION OF TUBERS TO VINES PLUS TUBERS.

The weights of vines and tubers were determined at Presque Isle) Me., at the time the analyses of the tubers reported in Table 1 were

made. As a rule, eight healthy potato plants were pulled and the}

Ne ee ee a ee ee ee ee ee ee |

a Aa eo ee er oe hee

. ; |

COPPER SPRAYS ON IRISH POTATO TUBERS. 1%

tatoes under them dug. The dirt was shaken from the vines and the adhering roots, and the soil was wiped from the tubers. The vines and tubers were then weighed together and separate weighings of the tubers were made. From these data the percentage of tubers © in terms of the total weight of the vines plus tubers was calculated.

TABLE 7.—Weight of potato vines and tubers, Presque Isle, Me., 1921.

: Bordeaux-sprayed. | Pickering-sprayed. No (Gheeky 7 ay ae Date : : Variety. weighed. | Vines.| Tubers. | Vines. | Tubers. |Vines.| Tubers. | | | 4

| Lbs. | Lbs. | Perct.| Lbs. | Lbs. | Perct.| Lbs. | Lbs. | Per ct. ¥eish Copbler:.... - ----..-==- July, 262 | 7-50))-*3.00,| 28.5.) 97.25, |=.2.50.} 25-6. |, 9.75.1 22.50 20. 4 Tees ees Oe ee De pee Aug. 152) 5.25 )°5275.) 52:3) 7-00 | 7200 | 50°07) 5525 | 5.25 50. 0 US Rae See ee eee Sept. 173| 3.50} 8.50] 70.8| 3.25; 9.00] 73.5] 2.50] 11.25] &81.8 Harly*ivose: 5-25 -4 &leosb Na Pay Pd AT AGM | ry i gS Seed Per eaters 6.00} 2.75 31.4 ES Se OE Pane Aug. 192] 6.75 | 6.75} 50.0 |.....-- Pes Cee 6.75 | 6.75; 50.0 Vee = = ee Se eee ea Sept. 143}] 6.25 | 13.75 | 68.8 |.....-- eesti ps |e eS 4.75 | 13.00 | 673.2 esivhy. Obi os E Rae 7S 21 Y 6507275 | QOET Eee Pisce Th OS 8.25] 2.50] 23.3 eee eee a Aug. 182] 7.25 | 6.75} 48.2 |....... [sa5255 Bete 8.25 | 8.00 49.2 yet SoU Seg Sept. 133] 4.25] 8.25] 66.0 |.....-- ee haere 4.00} 8.00! 66.7 Green Mountain........--- Aug. 231] 10.75 | 4.00} 27.1-/#11.50 | #5.00 | 430.3 | 8.50 | 2.75 | 24.4 LG eels Seen oe eee Aug. 2372] 7.00} 5.50] 44.0] 5.25] 4.00] 48.2] 5.75) 4.00 41.0 Tee eee ae EATER 29 Ee EE Sees 28 44.25 |44.00 |} 448.5 | 5.00) 5.00 50.0 = CLR ee Sept. 203 3.38 | 7.38 | 68.6 | 44.00 | 48.75 | 468.6 2. 25 | 7.25 | ©76.3 He OOS Se te Septs 205). 252)| ee [ern diab P10! 50P 7.4 (LL) lee Mies

[PS ae Pee ae domss etry) | 59.50 | 576.0 |

1 Date of first analysis.

2 Date of second analysis.

3 Date of last analysis.

¢ Barium-sprayed.

* Nickel-sprayed. 1

6 The check vines at time of last analyses were dead or partly dead and therefore lighter than the vines of the copper-sprayed plants. These figures are not comparable with the other data.

The data presented in Table 7 show that when the potato vines were growing, that is, while they were green, a higher propor- tion of tubers to vines plus tubers was usually found in the copper- sprayed than in the unsprayed plants. At the time the first weigh- ings were made, as soon as the tubers were about an inch in diameter, the infiuence of the copper sprays was shown. The results in Table 7 indicate that the stimulating effect of the copper is largely shown by the increased weights of tubers rather than by increased weights of the vines and that it is exerted early in their development. As the tubers are the storehouse for the starch formed in the leaves, the per- centage of starch in the tubers would naturally increase. At the time the last analyses of the tubers were made the unsprayed vines had partly dried and therefore were lighter than the corresponding vines for the copper-sprayed plants. The data for these samples are not directly comparable with the rest of the data.

INFLUENCE OF STRENGTH AND NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS OF COPPER SPRAYS ON COMPOSITION OF TUBERS.

Several samples of tubers grown in New Jersey during the season of 1920 were analyzed for solids and nitrogen. Some of the plots from which samples were taken had received a 10-10-50 Bordeaux spray; others had received a 5-5—50 Bordeaux spray; a third plot had been treated with a 24-24-50 spray; while some of the plots had received no copper spray. The results for solids and nitrogen in

18 BULLETIN 1146, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

the tubers from copper-sprayed plants were: 10-10-50 spray, 17.9 per cent solids and 0.38 per cent nitrogen; 5-5—50 spray, 18.5 per cent _ solids and 0.34 per cent nitrogen; 24-24-50 spray, 20.1 per cent solids and 0.33 per cent nitrogen. The check tubers contained 18.3 per cent solids and 0.33’ per cent nitrogen. The tubers from the plots receiy- ing the 23-24-50 spray were highest, and those from the 10-10-50- sprayed plots were lowest in solids.

These results suggest the possibility that a certain proportion of copper in a spray gives the maximum-stimulating effect in this local- ity and that a spray containing a greater proportion of copper may have a toxic rather than a stimulating effect. Tubers grown at Arlington Experimental Farm in 1920 from vines that were sprayed with a 10-10-50 Bordeaux spray (p. 18) seemed to have no advan- tages over the tubers from plants sprayed with a 44-50 Bordeaux. It is, of course, probable that the stimulating effect of the copper varies with the climatic conditions, variety of potatoes used, etc. Tubers from vines in New Jersey sprayed with a 5—5-50 spray eight times during the season were compared with tubers from vines sprayed only four times with Bordeaux spray of the same strength. The average data for four sets were 18.6 per cent of solids and 0.37 per cent of nitrogen in the tubers from vines sprayed eight times and 19.1 per cent of solids and 0.35 per cent of nitrogen for the tubers from vines sprayed only four times. These variations are small and may not be due to the differences in the spray applications. These data also indicate that too much copper may have reached the vines by the eight applications, whereas the amount of copper present in the four applications was nearer the quantity required to give the best protective effect or a maximum stimulation to the plants.

INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENT ON COMPOSITION OF TUBERS.

The following data were obtained during the 1919 season. Early Rose tubers grown in Connecticut contained 21.59 per cent solids and 0.38 per cent nitrogen and the same variety grown at Arlington Ex- perimental Farm contained 15.83 per cent solids and 0.33 per cent nitrogen. Irish Cobbler tubers grown in Connecticut contained 22.28 per cent solids and 0.43 per cent nitrogen, while the same variety grown at Arlington Experimental Farm contained 18.57 per cent solids and 0.36 per cent nitrogen. Dibble Russets from New York contained 25.38 per cent solids and 0.39 per cent nitrogen and thesame variety grown at Mt. Carmel, Conn., contained 21.24 per cent solids and 0.380 per cent nitrogen. Early Ohio tubers from Minnesota con- tained 22.79 per cent solids and 0.48 per cent nitrogen and the same variety from Connecticut, 20.52 per cent solids and 0.48 per cent nitrogen. These results again suggest that the composition of the tubers is infiuenced by the environment.

Although these tubers were not grown from the same stock, the results in each case seem to indicate that a northern tuber is higher in solids than asoutherntuber. Thismay explain why a northern grown potato is a better seed potato than one grown in the South. The data also show that there is a decided variation in the percentage of solids in tubers of different varieties grown in the same locality. In this connection it is interesting to recall the findings of LeClere and Yoder (27) who, working with wheat in four different parts

% ; ; ‘= ..

COPPER SPRAYS ON IRISH POTATO TUBERS. 19

of the United States, concluded that environment rather than hered- ity is the major factor in determining the physical and chemical characteristics of the wheat crop.

COPPER CONTENT OF VINES, STEMS, ROOTS, AND TUBERS OF SPRAYED AND UN- SPRAYED PLANTS.

Copper is widely distributed in nature. Apparently all plants and animals contain small amounts of this metal.

In 1816 Meissner (35) reported that copper was present in the ash of various plants in small quantities. Dieulafait (72) in 1880 showed that the amount of copper present in vegetation was largely de- termined by the nature of the soil.

Lehmann (28), in 1895 and 1896, estimated the copper in wheat, rye, barley, oats, maize, buckwheat, potatoes, beans, linseed, apricots, pears, breads, cocoa, and chocolate. He found that only in the plants grown in soil relatively high in copper does any appreciable amount of copper get into the plant. The species of plant is ap- parently of less importance than the copper content of the soil in determining the amount of copper found in the plant. In wheat and buckwheat the copper was chiefly in_ the stems and leaves, little being found in the fruits and seeds. Therefore a high copper content in the soil does not necessarily mean that much copper is present in the grain and seed. The form in which the copper exists in plants is not known. Lehmann gives data showing that the quantity of copper in any species of plant varies with the individuals of the species, even when grown on the same soil in the same year, and under similar conditions.

MacDougal (34) examined microscopically and analyzed various parts of a ‘tree which had grown in copper-bearing soil. He found metallic copper in relatively large quantities throughout the tissues, indicating an absorption of copper by the tree over a period of years.

TABLE 8.—Copper in tubers from copper-sprayed and noncopper-sprayed plants.

[ Parts per million.]

Copper in dry tubers from vines treated with 1—

arsenate |Bordeaux| Picker- | arsenate

| Variety. | Place grown. Calcium Lead Ghee (no cop- | spray. jing spray-.| (no cop- per) ; |

Spalding Rose........... | gk ea 8 | in 15) Po Cee. Ree ee

Farm, Trish es See ae ee ie. 3 Goeth Ms HAY ol 11 13 Oil? ae. tsp eee 2 3 eae ae Le ee ee ats G (ener SL aes ee 11 15 DY 50 Pe ge Ye Sr ae Do Lt See eee ea ae 7 ee ea! GO se 5 es 14 16 Dt A) i ee eek worse: 05. oo) ee | oe S| maa ae Uy a 11 14 BS 'f. fete as Be ee TO foes 2 ee ED aisha American Giant.. ae eee | Nawsherseyis? 2252s Sluis oS oN wh on ees poe 10 11 Gi bo Uy Bases oe ee Biaeky Orage se, Pe Pe Monnesoba 2 2eeto2' 22 ie olte ae 10} }-2 Ae eee 13 Green Mountain .-....... Presque Isle, Me. --.-:._- EE. le BO fe 322 a A ees 9 Magnum Bonum......... IN@W. WORK ose) oat lS | 5 SRR He LTE ea ee ee 10 Pebble Basset... 222-222]. 22. 05 (eS gS Sa ee ae K ; : RaeaRs Aaa 2282 aes = ennsylyanin. 2 sees) ee [re eae fe eee 10 Waurmouceenme ceteris ff) ipre PO ear it Roe | ERSTE MS _ 2e | 10 | RIES 10

1 All of the copper-sprayed plants received an arsenical spray as well. 2 Sprayed twice. 3 Sprayed 6 times.

20 BULLETIN 1146, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

Some of the tubers from copper-sprayed and from unsprayed potato plants grown at Arlington Experimental Farm during the season of 1920 were analyzed for copper (Table 8). The average figure for tubers from copper-sprayed plants grown at Arlington was 13.5 and for those from plants receiving no copper, 11 parts of copper per million. Average figures for tubers grown in other localities were 10 parts of copper per million for those from both the Bordeaux-sprayed and unsprayed vines. The writer (71) has shown that tubers contain only traces of copper, while the roots, stems, and leaves of potato plants contain appreciable quantities.

During the season of 1921 three separate samples of leaves, stems, and roots from four varieties of potatoes were analyzed for copper. At the time of each analysis nine plants were dug and immediately taken to the laboratory, where they were washed in water. The plants were next dipped in 4 per cent hydrochloric acid for 80 seconds and then held in water for 5 minutes. This process was repeated three times. The plants were finally placed in a large tub, covered with water, and allowed to remain overnight. The next day all of the plants were thoroughly rinsed in running water and then in distilled water, after which they were dried in the air. The leaves were used for analysis directly. The stems and roots of all the samples were carefully scraped with a knife to remove the outer layers of plant tissue. The scraped samples were then washed in distilled water to remove any possible copper contamination during the scraping process. Five grams of the dried sample were used for copper analysis by the colorimetric method. The acid and water treatments apparently removed all the external copper from the plants, as the results for copper in the roots are higher than those for copper in the leaves.

TABLE 9.—Copper in leaves, stems, and roots of Bordeaux-sprayed and un- sprayed potato plants, 1921.

(Parts per million on the dry basis.)

Leaves. Stems | Roots.

aieeine ep ue Sprayed | . U2=_ | sprayed | . U™ . | Sprayed | . UE

: praye@ | sprayed | PPTAY€* | sprayed | PPTAaYe* | sprayed

plants plants. plants. plants. plants. plants. ues stanly: OhiO- 244-2 See hace ee 6.6 5.0 3.4 2.6 6.7 3.8 OSs wharly ROSC)— a3. sccinc sack es 13.0 10.0 6.6 4.0 18.4 6 Doss | sais Cobbler’. 222. Sesh ee 11.0 9.0 9.3 8.9 21.5 16.9 Do.-.| Green Mountain 2..-......-....- 8.0 7.4 4.6 5.8 7.5 8.0 Auresisenl Barly @hio..-.2)4.65..0.. ee 10.6 12.0 9.4 S41}: 2 wees 9.9 1D Ose | tbarhystiOSe se .eke oo aes ooo ce 9.6 9.6 6.0 8.0 8.6 10.4 Do imishiCopplers. saa cc eb ace 12.0 8.0 7.6 10.2 8.4 8.0 Do...| Green Mountain 2.--............ 11.4 10.6 7.0 7.0 10.1 8.6 Senta lonmlarlyshOhiOn =. sas2e 8 feces eae 17.3 10.0 14.0 THIS AaHle 26.0 13.8 OLvN Barly AROSes. = coo se cc coe ce eee 13.0 9.0 5.0 8.5 19.4 9.1 Done inshiCopblersss- een. Sse ao 11.0 9.0 8.1 6.3 8.3 9.0 Do...| Green Mountain.-.-.-...-.....- 9.0 6.8 6.3 4.4 9.1 6.6

1 Sprayed with Pickering spray. 2 Sprayed with barium-water spray.

The data for the leaves, stems, and roots, given in Table 9, show

certain variations, but in the majority of the samples the correspond-_

ing figures for the copper-sprayed were higher than. those for the unsprayed samples. The roots held the most and the stems the least

; : t ;

ee plete

COPPER SPRAYS ON IRISH POTATO TUBERS, 21 : \ copper for all four varieties of potato plants. The three early vari- eties of potato plants contained more copper than the Green Moun- tain, a late variety. An appreciable quantity of the copper was present in all of the check plants.

GENERAL DISCUSSION.

In the case of copper sprays it is generally recognized that a small quantity of copper is gradually rendered soluble either by the juices of the plant or by the carbon dioxid of the air, and this copper thus rendered soluble may protect the plant and may stimulate its meta- bolic activities. The intensity of action of the copper compounds varies with the kind of plant used and with the quantity of copper applied. This difference in the ability of plants to withstand the action of copper sprays was illustrated by the drastic effect of Pick- ering sprays (9) on the grape and apple compared with its favorable action on the potato and cranberry. The influence of environment, soil, climate, etc., must also be considered in this connection, as a Bordeaux spray may be used on a certain plant in one section of the country but can not be used without severe injury on the same plant in another locality. The data show that increased growth and tuber formation of the potato following the use of copper sprays may be secured. The fact that a certain amount of hopperburn was present in most of the fields where these tests were conducted is recognized. It was not severe in any case and practically none was observed on the plants at Arlington Experimental Farm. Some of the increased yield of tubers from copper-sprayed potato plants was undoubtedly due to the action of the copper sprays in controlling potato leaf- hoppers and thereby reducing hopperburn. It is difficult to explain it all on the basis of protective action alone.

Analyses of grapes from copper-sprayed and from unsprayed vines reported by the writer (9) showed that the composition of the grape had apparently been altered by the application of the copper sprays. Evidently copper sprays alter the composition of the potato and the grape and there is no reason to believe that their action is restricted to these two plants.

Several theories have been advanced to explain the increased yield of tubers from Bordeaux-sprayed: potato plants:

(a) Bordeaux spray increases the transpiration rate of potato plants, according to Lutman, Duggar, and others. This effect would apparently be an advantage in wet seasons or wet localities but a dis- advantage in dry seasons or dry localities. Differences in humidity cause differences in the transpiration of plants, and this may react on the growth of the plant and the composition of the tubers.

(6) It is possible that changes in the rate of respiration or in the general metabolism of potato plants may follow the application of copper sprays. A small quantity of copper may be absorbed by the plant and stimulate it to increased activity. There are several ex- amples of stimulation brought about by a small amount of a sub- stance which in large quantities is toxic. There is evidence that copper stimulates some plants and the fact that stimulation can not be shown to exist does not prove that it is not there. Analyses of the leaves, vines, and roots of sprayed and unsprayed potato vines in most cases showed a higher proportion of copper in the leaves,

79. BULLETIN 1146, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

stems, and roots of the sprayed potato plants than in those of the unsprayed plants. :

(¢) Variations in sunlight or stimulation resulting from the appli- cation of copper sprays may influence the photosynthetic processes.

(d) The copper sprays protect the vines which are thus kept freer from tip burn, disease, and insect injury. Vines treated in this way are therefore more vigorous and their tubers may show an increase in solids, as well as in yield. It is now recognized that potato leaf- hoppers are the direct cause of hopperburn and that Bordeaux mixture repels the hoppers. Bordeaux spray is a protection against potato leafhoppers, flea beetles, and other insects, as well as against fungous diseases. It is not clear why the tubers should be higher in solids unless it is simply taken for granted that a vigorous plant produces a tuber higher in solids than a less vigorous plant. There is a possibility that the protective effect of Bordeaux is the only effect produced, but copper salts have such a pronounced effect on all living tissue that a stimulation is generally suspected and even accepted by many investigators in this field.

Some suggestions from the recent work of Sherman and his co- workers are of interest in this connection. They studied the effects of certain antiseptics upon the activity of amylases (42), all of which were very sensitive to copper sulphate. They also studied the influ- ence of certain amino acids upon the enzymic hydrolysis of starch (43), finding that glycine, alanine, phenyl! alanine, or tyrosine caused an undoubted increase in the rate of hydrolysis of starch by purified pancreatic amylase, commercial pancreatin, saliva, or purified amy- lase. The favorable effect is not due to any influence on hydrogen ion concentration nor to a combination of the amino acid with the product of the enzymatic reaction. The addition of 1 per cent of these amino acids was shown to be a very effective means of pro- tecting the enzyme from the deleterious eftect of copper sulphate and may even serve to restore to full activity any enzyme which has been partially inactivated by copper. Arginine and cystine have a favor- able influence upon the hydrolysis of starch by purified pancreatic amylase, while histidine and tryptophane do not (j4). The effect of histidine and tryptophane differs from that of all the other amino acids studied, possibly because of their heterocyclic structure or their position in the protein complex which doubtless constitutes either the enzyme itself or an essential part of it.

There is evidence that a somewhat larger quantity of copper is present in copper-sprayed potato plants than in the unsprayed plants, and also that the proportion of amino and amid nitrogen in potato plants increases during growth. Data showing that copper had a favorable effect on the yield and composition of tubers were obtained. Possibly the amino acids protect the cell activity from any toxic action of the copper, thus permitting the copper to exert a stimulating effect on the cells.

It is recognized that it would be desirable to have data showing the normal variation for the different varieties of tubers under the same conditions, but time did not permit the securing of such data. Analyses of several hundred tubers, both copper-sprayed and check, were obtained and the average data from this large number of tubers should overcome individual variation.

COPPER SPRAYS ON IRISH POTATO TUBERS. iy

The results reported in this paper appear to establish the fact that copper sprays not only increase the yield of potatoes in various sec- tions of the country, but favorably influence their composition.? Bor- deaux sprays, Pickering sprays, and barium-water sprays seemed to _ give the increased yield and increased solids of the tubers which apparently depend on the presence of copper in the spray. In addi- tion to plant-disease control and insect control, the copper appears to exert a stimulating action on the potato plant.

Bordeaux and other sprays containing copper are usually applied to the potato to control the late blight. “In some States such a spray is applied as a repellent to the flea beetle and the potato leafhopper, thereby reducing the injury to the foliage from these two insect pests and at the same time lessening tip burn and hopperburn. The im- portance of the effect of copper sprays on the yield of potatoes, in addition to their control of diseases and insects, has not been gener- ally recognized or at least emphasized. Nor has the fact that tubers from copper-sprayed plants may be stored more satisfactorily—that is, with less loss from rot—than tubers from noncopper-sprayed plants been wide y advertised. When, in addition, an increased yield of potatoes and a higher proportion of solids in them follow the appli- _cation of copper sprays, important additional reasons for their more general use become evident.

SUMMARY.

Tubers from copper-sprayed potato plants at the time they were large enough for analysis (about one inch in diameter) were usually higher in solids, starch, and nitrogen than the tubers from un- sprayed vines. ‘The starch content increased approximately 50 per cent as the tubers matured, while the dextrose disappeared and the sucrose was materially reduced. The early varieties of potatoes showed a decrease in their sugar content to accompany an increased starch content in the copper- -sprayed tubers during the early stages of development. The proportion of insoluble ash decreased during the growth of the tubers, although the total ash content remained constant. The total nitrogen increased. The figures for soluble, coagulable, and particularly the monoamino and amid nitrogen increased as the tubers matured.

The proportion of tubers to green vines appeared to be higher for the copper-sprayed than for the unsprayed plants.

Average data for seven States obtained in 1919 showed the food value of an acre of copper-sprayed potatoes to be 839 pounds more than that for an acre of noncopper-sprayed potatoes. Two factors, increased yield (48 bushels an acre) and an increase of solids (5.6 per cent), are involved.

Some results obtained at Arlington Experimental Farm, Va., com- paring a 10-10-50 Bordeaux and a 5-5-50 Bordeaux, suggest that the former spray has no advantage over the latter and may possibly furnish too much copper for the maximum stimulating or protective effects. Results from New Jersey, where a 44-50 Bordeaux spray was applied eight times, compared with results where the same spray

* Attention is called to the experiments of Gray and Ryan, Monthly Bull. Dept. Agr. State of California, Chemical Number, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 11-33, 1921. They showed that the acidity of oranges was reduced by the arsenical spray.

24 BULLETIN 1146, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

was applied four times, show that the tubers were lower in solids in the former than in the latter case, suggesting again that too much copper may have reached the plant for the best results in the absence of any late blight.

Tubers from several varieties of potatoes grown in a northern State were higher in solids than tubers of the same varieties grown in a State farther south.

A larger yield of potatoes was secured from copper-sprayed than from check or noncopper-sprayed vines. Late blight (Phytophthora infestans) is eliminated as a necessary factor in the case.

When a lime spray containing no copper was used at Arlington Ex- perimental Farm, Va., the yields of tubers were decreased. Picker- ing-limewater spray and a barium-water spray gave practically the same increase in yield and in solids of the tubers as a Bordeaux spray. The copper in the spray seems to be the essential factor.

LITERATURE CITED. -

(1) Anos, A. The effect of fungicides upon the assimilation of carbon dioxide by green leaves. J. Agr. Sci., 2 (1907) : 257-266. (2) APPLEMAN, C. O. Changes in potatoes during storage. Md. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 167 (1912) : 327-834. (3) Assoc. OFFIcIAL AGR. CHEMISTS. Official and tentative methods of analysis, 417 pp. Washington, D. C., 1920. (4) Bascock, D. C. Potato diseases. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 319 (1917) : 121-136. (5) BALL, EB. D. The potato leafhopper and the hopperburn. Phytopath., 9 (1919): 291-293. (6) CHUARD, and PoRCcHET, E. L’action des sels de cuivre sur les végétaux. Arch. sci. phys. nat., 14 (1902) : 502-5. (7) CLARK, W. M., and Luss, H. A. The colorimetric determination of hydrogen ion concentration and its applications in bacteriology. J. Bact., 2 (1917): 1-84. (8) CLINnToNn, G. P. Report of the botanist for 1915. Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta. 39th Ann. Rpt. (1915) : 421-487. (9) Cook, F. C. Pickering sprays. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bull. 866 (1920) : 47 pp.

Composition of tubers, skins, and sprouts of three varieties of potatoes. J. Agr. Research, 20 (1921) : 623-635. (11)

Absorption of copper from the soil by potato plants. J. Agr. Research, 22 (1921) : 281-287. (12) DIEULAFAIT. Sur la présence normale du cuivre dans les plantes qui vivent sur les roches de la formation primordiale. Compt. rend., 90 (1880): 703-705. (13) Duptry, J. E., and Witson, H. F. Combat potato leafhopper with Bordeaux. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 334 (1921) : 31 pp. (14) Dueear, B. M., and Cootey, J. S. The effects of surface films on the rate of transpiration: Experiments with potted potatoes. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard., 7 (1914) : 351-356. (15) EpeErrton, C. W. Delayed ripening of tomatoes caused by spraying with Bordeaux mix- ture. La, Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 164 (1918) : 1-16.

COPPER SPRAYS ON IRISH POTATO TUBERS. 25

(16) Erwin, A. T. ‘Bordeaux spray for tip burn and early blight of potatoes. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 171 (1917) : 61-75. (17) Ewert, R. Der wechselseitige Hinfluss des Lichtes und der Kupferkalkbriihen auf den Stoffwechsel der Pflanze. Landw. Jahrb., 34 (1905) : 233-310. (18) Frnron, F. A., and HARTZELL, A. Control of the potato leafhopper. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Cire. 77 (1922) : 4 pp. : (19) FRANK, B., and Krutcrr, F. Ueber den Reiz, welchen die Behandlung mit Kupfer auf die Kartof- felpflanze hervorbringt. Ber. botan. Ges., 12 (1894): 8-11. (20) Gurppines, N. J. Potato spraying in 1909 and 1910. W. Va. Agr. Exp. Sta. Rpt., 1909-10, pp. 18-19. (21) GrRArRD, A. Recherches sur la culture de la pomme de terre industrielle. Dévelop- ment progressif de la plante. Compt. rend., 708 (1889) : 602-604. (22) Harrison, F. C. The effect of spraying Bordeaux mixture on foliage. Ont. Agr. Coll. 23d Ann. Rpt. (1897): 125-128. (23) HERLES, F. Volumetric starch estimation in potatoes. 8th Internat. Congress Ap- plied Chem., 26 (1912) : 5-10. (24) Jones, C. H., and WHuIts, B. O. Report of the chemists. Vt. Agr. Exp. Sta. 13th Ann. Rpt. (1899- 1900) : 874-890. (25) Kanpa, M. Studien tiber die Reizwirkung eininger Metallsalze auf das Wachsthum hoherer Pflanzen. J. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokyo, 19, Art. 13 (1904) : 1-37. (26) KREUSLER, U. Chemisch-physiologische Untersuchungen tiber das Wachsthum der Kartoffelpfianze bei kleinerem und grésserem Saatgut. Landw. Jahrb., 15 (1886) : 309-379. (27) LeCrerc, J. A., and Yoprer, P. A. Environmental influences on the physical and chemical characteristies of wheat. J. Agr. Research, 7 (1914) : 275-291. (28) LEHMANN, K. B. Hygienische Studien tiber Kupfer. Arch. Hyg., 24 (1895): 1-17; 27 (1896) : 1-7. (29) Letpy, R. W. The spraying of Irish potatoes. N. C. Dept. Agr. Bull. 40 (1919), no. 3, 38 pp. (30) Lint, H. C. Report of potato scab experiments, 1915. N. J. Agr. Exp. Sta. 36th Ann. Rpt. (1915) : 375-894. (31) LopEMAN, HE. G. : ; The spraying of orchards, apples, quinces, plums. N. Y. Cornell Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 86 (1895) : 47-76. (32) LutTMAN, B. F. Plant diseases in 1911, potato spraying experiments in 1911. Vt. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 162 (1912) : 33-45.

Some studies on Bordeaux mixture. Vt. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 196 (1916) : 1-80. (34) MacpoucaL, D. T. Copper in plants. Botan. Gaz., 27 (1899) : 68-69. (35) MEISSNER, W. Versuche tiber den Kupfer-Gehalt einiger Pflanzenaschen. J. Chem. Physik. (Schweigger), 17 (1816): 340-54. (36) MoNTEMARTINI, L. Nuove osservasioni sopra l’azione eccitante del solfato di rame sulle piante. Rev. patol. veg., 10 (1920) : 36-40. (57) Port, E. Handbueh der tierischen Ernahrung und der lJandwirtscaftlichen Futtermittel, vols. 1 and 2. Paul Parey, Berlin, 1904.

26

(38) (39)

(40)

(41)

(42)

(43) (44) (45) 246) (47) (48) (49) (50)

(51) (52)

BULLETIN 1146, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

PRITCHARD, F. J., and CLARK, W. B.

Effect of copper soap and of Bordeaux soap spray mixtures on control

of tomato leaf spot. Phytopath., 9 (1919) : 554-564. PRUNET, A.

Recherches phy pee giques sur les tubercules de la pomme de terre.

Rev. gén. botan., 5 (1898) : 49-64. Rum, C.

Zur Kenntnis der Giftwirkung der Bordeauxbriihe und ihrer Bestand- teile auf Spirogyra longata und die Uredosporen von Puccinia coronata. Erwin Nagale, Stuttgart, 1895.

SCHANDER, R.

Uber die physiologische Witkune der Kupfervitriolkalkbriihe. Landw. Jahrb., 33 (1904) : 517-584.

SHERMAN, H. C., and CALDWELL, Mary L.

A study of the influence of arginine, histidine, tryptophane and cystine upon the hydrolysis of starch by purified pancreatic amylase. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 43 (1921) : 2469-2476.

and WALKER, FLORENCE. The influence of certain amino acids upon the enzymic hydrolysis of

starch. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 43 (1921) : 2461-2469.

and WAYMAN, MARGUERITE.

Effect of certain antiseptics upon the activity of amylases. J. Am. Chem. Soe., 43 (1921): 2454-2461.

SORAUER, P. ;

Hinige Beobachtungen bei der Anwendung von Kupfermitteln gegen die Kartoffelkrankeit. Z. Pflanzenkrankh., 3 (1893) : 32-386.

STEWART, F. C., Eustace, H. J., and SmRRiIne, F. A.

Potato-spraying experiments in 1902. N. Y. Geneva Agr. Exp. Sta.

Bull. 221 (1902) : 285-268.

Potato-spraying experiments, 1902-1911. N. Y. Geneva Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 349 (1912) : 99-139. STEWART, EF. C., FRENCH, G. T., and SIRRINE, F. A. Potato-spraying experiments in 1910. N. Y. Geneva Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 338 (1910) : 115-151. TREBOUX, O. Hinige stoffliche Einfitisse auf die Kohlersdaureassimilation bei sub- mersen Pflanzen. Flora, 92 (1903) : 56-58. Von SCHRENK, H. Intumescences formed as a result of chemical stimulation. Mo. Bot. Gard. 16th Ann. Rpt. (1905) : 125-148. Woops, C. D. Potato studies. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 277 (1919): 17-82. ZUCKER, A. Beitrag zur direkten Beeinflussung der Pflanzen durch die Kupfer- vitriol-Kalkbriihe. Alfred Miller & Co., Stuttgart, 1896.

ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

AGRICULTURE. Secretary of Agriculture___________-_______- Henry C. WALLACE. PESO IEG SCUR CLOT ee a en C. W. PUGSLEY. Director of Scienttfie: Works... > Bare Purecior of Regulatory Werle... =. TET Ge es Ba) RET | aa ac” Sc CHARLES F. Marvin, Chief. Bureau of Agricultural Economics_________ _ Henry C. Taytor, Chief. Burcau. of Animal Industry: ~ = JOHN R. Mouter, Chief. ECA Of ENGI ANOUSET YS Wiitiam A. Tayntor, Chief. PEE ORE SCT UUCE oe oS = a a W. B. GREELEY, Chief. eC OT CCIUESEI one eee eS WALTER G. CAMPBELL, Acting Chief. SALE MILIO NOLS eaten te agg EE Mitton WHITNEY, Chief. Bureau of Hntomotogy=-— = L. O. Howarp, Chief. Bureau of Biological Survey. = E. W. NELSON, Chief. PUTCO OF PIUUEC FROGWS =. ee eee Se THoMAS H. MaAcDonatp, Chief. Fized Nitrogen Research Laboratory______- F. G. CotTrett, Director. Division of Accounts and Disbursements____ A. ZAPPONE, Chief. Duwasion of Publications_2_ 23 eee JOHN L. Cogss, Jr., Chief. TRENT EU aE 8 Se eer CLARIBEL R, BARNETT, Librarian. States hetations Service___.__.- a A. C. TRvuE, Director. Pederal Hortieuliurat Board. > C. L. Margiatt, Chairman. Insecticide and Fungicide Board__________- J. K. Haywoop, Chairman. Packers and Stockyards Administration_____ CHESTER Morrit., Assistant to the Grain Future Trading Act see Secretary. Oyice Of the-Noherterss R. W. WrittaMs, Solicitor.

This bulletin is a contribution from—

PALE CEL: Of CRENUISUT AY. = ee W. G. CAMPBELL, Acting Chief. Miscellaneous Division__________-_-___- J. K. Haywoop, Chief. 27

ADDITIONAL COPIES

OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D..C.

AT

5 CENTS PER COPY

PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COPY FOR PROFIT.—PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAY lI, 1922

V

a ian oe Ck PL: Per eee avy ree ooT Oe a, 73

rm h rt St is i; ate SAH ar +4 ry (Roe te

ee AAO. a BO ce CAR Sawer hie oh seg Ma danaraT Ce tara bie aes ROO Ta

Stink dine

MENS mero it mito aren SS retgumeneioet RES Xe ¥ MB ere A vt oo yt Ai, ae oe rem, Porat 7 | . pf he BPS : BG rtior caves! > 2) eaEte Wi pn! Oe : ae) ae BOE Era ee yes. WLIO leone YE. tes ; nal ; Tha; eet ge. a ae Baie. Ros te mi RAAE | ie: sister oa ; PRP NG. {heat yas Be a. wipe Baer Ayied aos hone mo Kai. at ner, re: ust, at a

t

elem th el he OE a a ar

ent: Sv iS 2mKH wall, ih “Seal iia a { iy ee: aera iy ie re : Sg aa ea A ene Se ete aud nt , vie hens Sia : =r dea isk 'sk ae ane HSIN he xavewE | » Apentesiods: Ls ere is said

Ade tes oe: oe

wa

= De aay ote ee tne RR ae g sae id eo at sobiadias sede By : Sy OWE) f, “PORT A a3, “ar ate nti Said) OOR TAM 2 ee ES : EB ; - = het OY EE ROIRE EER 2 : ; MieT CURTIS STAM ROIS Bits to! tee erat, Does SAG or SACRE aa? ~ 25300 DIG TH ER ee ; oe OT Ie AE aber Sire Ao eh | eat meres ae iy, BEE BTS a ie UTE a0 Liam OF TO4 ame aark eau AN A Ome TA ea att ey tcah me : - ‘i - : 5 5 | | ea s ; . De ty ; f :