~ meme 3 mn Sih ats epeecibtmasng aa es eet enemy RxTy hr éin| eee erat ~ Z ns Pp we Piel = | Co ae . p sShest ba aS Niitthia ae “ww, PT | elt ott y VOW. , e ww ayer wo Mirena a wy WS é Dh badk ht | te wed jee ui i Ve. ) wrtth a, tv) 2s at at, ft Land le ‘wy a: s Yee a = | Vn aPtes oon (ve siteey, matitys Abe Nyy, vy Vigitiy ty TREE LTO CLOSET HA be x *y vob, Vibe sey Ne me a7) Lob ke | pls i eT At a} ead BE PEL PPT T Se Maka al Ne odilibhe he ail ia. : A ‘iyity’* MT ey thes seve rece? aed ’ « TW ates | baht t ILM Vey tyes cers y, 1 oly el LS yn =s Pal. e ac 2 Why : LA ee silt) MRO , aos one, te Oyr oh Th ss od hy eA d CNA =» wr blatel “w Fires -? oy eae: heme dae = a a wes Sees -_o8 F as ‘ . | . lh dé PL hake ia berate ' Es Ped og ee oe Cini : * vt "y ¥ : . . S rare), ; ab a} oh + f Tt 4 @ a ‘i 4 ve aot Tec, ‘a Py be) 0) Be ae be a e ef +, * anne Any " 4. Des 5 iy ¢ Lae ,wees Soha A as J Aah BAZ ANE G adds 4 TULL LT wer ws HIT etter eed Lal ren | ri) AUC ¥ fy W wee, UWs v A. of = « @ au J Mi eee hn FS OS rege WW ARs at “ae' Pee! | my rN en sees ie te ee ee BS Re ‘te gvv : ye OO keh re Yay hte . UJ Jo ae SSS eS VEU Suezeeleee wees ots My S495 ine ue ) Pape he : bod SEL TLTLT seabed =e Bele | \ i \, : : “sd * ., a? iris g ) T is of Pwey fe F ee Banke Ss Nyy! [ , de = tetfale Ped |e J sd bs, ahiecdasesiee ~ tte ee St beh te wp | soe q YU ws. : : rt : = ea ed ww vey we Un wy ~ vy dy a Cs |) Bus Ws w ‘ened efi te = Se » aan td te wi he) tees te ‘ Wepeaeuoye surg itteyy VOW . . Hetecseaee rele TM Quire ween ety eerie 1 WirWierereve ee sor Ue Prater! Merny, wettellten te) || es bh es we Pe eeR Seegges als Coteie.” = SH ON 8 al wel Wyse ey cu” ~~ i ed he . - bh) Pee @ Oo Neerg do etty deg gse Wess reilitte FAL i MLL TU JLULEL SEENON 2m ) RAPA ADM SSAA LI; } to , Nyy ‘ ri yt i SUL a aaah. Lt r NM ee “ AEs oa wiry . eye TAS oad af ar ai - A Ses | a we. . " ‘ ¥ mh, 4 | i ". LS —~VOVeg P sa “¥ \ ; 8 wr re wy 1 AAD | Ning ’ b eer IEA dU gdteea @ V¥rway Wy *e vn me Ny, ee ccaue aa Aaa Pitty wy eed Py *<. ety i wale” “A 4 Ewe : gv A tal 3 Z ee -w.e Game Eee ami nttEN ten Sian ove “Wye FOS ee tu, apees "y yn 99 They beg. ARAL pe Na 11) we. 2. - vy \wuyet! BUSS | ee poe wy eerie. A tf ss a te | whe 2S anon Aghpe 08 Wy | VwWevy a” re a LE et Pies ss OSes went BS ee Se | ae | : Ba , ly i ¥ : yj%4 af ee hls pdvtena dl tye » Pe’ PBN ERASE hl te sage NHN = oe pb bot “ee | Fa Se : orev 2 ey ren yUbe - Tae tty me yey ' » 14 : vee) ad wy " Raa Tay VETeEres. ee ake y,oNye ie Lp ees : vGy | z Ah {| ern pas ATS EN | vendiyll wren tagataaarl N Ne eet * A oe TOO pra poe v 3 ee X sce * / FOE PAA yy dit AMOS a WOT mymyiries [i he RL EY Dal T fende = ey be v" 795 2 VyrBMies - ase SPARS % O41 log Tey ree pert rincen mart SRSA TE LEIITTT EEL mre fhrn . = we = ; emp rT a og 3 > Se: “ren $ thot hy ae A hs EP Lew oO Syaewyt LAT PT tad is ; Re ey del ol 94. 347 Wy ad ae aes » Dye Z Wags ates qe ' : 4 d ay ereerry ay ED AAL “49 vere 7 We be Ses OT be Ew vate Neen pop venir Fee camel Jeet Nani ee ans Veen Oe oT ee Fe trre . Wer. rT | A ee a i } ——— SSS —— '. [| Ue a a ae ih oe (Wy! : +H: if 7 ea ¥ 4a a va ¥ ea in bat Fel tui) ie Os Ry me im Tae orl ts ae aii ia a hte mh, Bs; , " ge i ay Ma Nh a ; OL 0 7 MI me 7 re n ie .s - i iw yi Jee Ai i ri : : Haat ms AN ae om) On ; on 7 Ns. a Me ae a 5) ne V), 7 ‘ i aa) ra ve n - a yf in Wo iy y nw) i Al 7 Aan , P) 4 ie : ue . ‘ : 7 hat) : Oh ws Ve <0 : Uae Eh re va 7" a * i ‘ 5 ie a ! tae rent nf a De ag Gey) ot ee oo my ris : ; " He yi 4 aan ve fe! ' Aa Unf oe a oe, han ¥ 4 he V4 a | ate aes P Mi oh : re , * ys ie Aly: ve : ray - nvin aL 4 r ran! yr t f i on eS y ay, in es ew | J 7 ‘a : hi) i a oe i a as iy an as a we Ay cae 7 : he a ; - ne 7 + : cea : 7 q aang ’ N uy a b a ey fi "i iA) 1) - —_ anand ur bite ‘iy Py i aaa. fs OF, ae Th el 7 ee We ie eee AE i ee ae aa : ee is ue ape (7 - irr Oren rien, 4) Se Cs Re Pi ia ar & a ey a i 7 fires) a ‘i : ekg ane ae i ai i Fa 7 vy ae +4 : aan i : vy yy ely: fu) ha 7 Vey | aan o i nal Dea Ru) ‘io a ye a “e rh tah Y _ ; nnn wy A My 1 ! ee ‘a ’ oa _ ne 7 Bee: PA), SHO) eT a ‘ 6 iH (4 i _ ays : Aaa. Pe Pinte ee ey a 7 a i i cet : oF Mi Cites We Ah Vine a a Tr ae ah io i A a: iv : awe. | ‘ ' q eo or : r a en 7 y As wih e int a ce ie + ny ai re ' : ( ar ea c mor yy as 7 in a Py " y, ah yu Tie ; . ; ui ; 4 1 shi ia Wy ‘a ivi : Y i A! my ‘a re, eae Meni re vem . a / ‘a, » ia Th SAP, om ah | a att ti: ine ns uy ane ee ta ‘ a ba ay mt ir at a ua ari aS s bile ite i is : a on : ra May ea t - 7 aly 5 Mi i u) im ; Ae Na i 7 +) i o nae i Tia: Pon ae Vout . } | it us i , at a 7 ‘7 A bi ‘) 5 i) 7 pt. any. un 7 i net Ae hb fda ee HT i | SOM ry _ ne eo Ba ais i is iit Pate ¥ Sate aD Nt 7 ; 7 - J ROL Vein Bee edie, eee Ut er ees, Ha ot ‘i as a via 7 ae i Wi chi ¢ a ; nie ra a a , a : ue if 7 bay \ | iy 5 wi iy ; A - n oma 2 Re : yn atk vy aan ne “| ~ ad «ly SE ae i a ae a a ithe an ny He ne 4 — ee ry, ‘ zs Ds i y a ty Aa mY ie, ; ae i 7 : n " 7 b A ee % a a - 7 Me y ek wa moe 7 Mh ye te : . ! Le a } a Oy es ik ; Lah ea : F ay aie i as 7 7 a Lane r Me a aa ue Wy ft), a. a ive “T Abe a uy 7 a 7 A " Lan ig a Z i . ie iy we _ ‘a cn ag ‘ on ak nate. r Ue A MC Se Py Ce ‘dines I aa _ 1s Bi i 7; as Ne ay ie Ne . i} ) eo id : he i ; a i. rao ge if ss - 4 a rie salah hy A! iw a Su ; f i) .* , : i i A Me a Ay ey Jitteh ak Ye iy as , u ae i; ‘ 7 oo wy. in 7 on nt an Bal’ a a) ah ap aed, all Mv in iy p — 5 ‘a ie : 5 x Caer em wy 3 “ie ay nr i i : mu mir od - * : Prim i My a is Wires s)he re Bia 4 ay at La is ad Ware) Willa: i ‘ \f ry AN INTRODUCTION TO THE PIUDY OF BISHES y Division of Fishes, F U. S. National Museu Se AN INTRODUCTION 1p ° f) TO THE Fist} STUDY OF FISHES BY ALBERT C. L. G. GUNTHER M.A. M.D. Ph.D. F.R.S. KEEPER OF THE ZOOLOGICAL DEPARTMENT IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM Carpit aquas pinnis. EDINBURGH ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK 1880 - [All rights reserved.) Printed by R. & R. CLARK, Edinburgh. PREFACE. — THE-scope of the present work is to give in a concise form an account of the principal facts relating to the structure, classification, and life-history of Fishes. It is intended to meet the requirements of those who are desirous of studying the elements of Ichthyology ; to serve as a book of reference to zoologists generally ; and, finally, to supply those who, like travellers, have frequent opportunities of observing fishes, with a ready means of obtaining information. The article on “ Ichthyology,” prepared by the late Sir J. Richard- son for the eighth edition of the “ Encyclopedia Britannica,” is the only publication which has _hither- to partly satisfied such requirements; and when I undertook, some years ago, to revise, or rather rewrite that article for the new edition of that work, it occurred to me that I might at the same time prepare a Handbook of Ichthyology, whilst reserving for the article an abstract so condensed as to be adapted for the wants of the general reader. From the general plan of the work I have only departed in those chapters which deal with the Geographical Distribution of Fishes. This is a sub- ject which has never before been treated in a general vi PREFACE. and comprehensive manner, and seemed to demand particular attention. I have, therefore, thought it right to give nominal lists of the Faun, and the other details of fact on which I have based my con- clusions, although all the necessary materials may be found in my ‘‘ Catalogue of Fishes.” A few references only to the numerous sources which were consulted on the subjects of Chapters 1-12, are inserted in the text; more not required by the beginner; he is introduced to a merely elementary knowledge of facts well known to the advanced student. With regard to the illustrations, about twenty have been prepared after originals published by Cuvier, J. Miiller, Owen, Traquair, Duméril, Cunning- ham, Hasse, Poey, Siebold, and Gegenbaur, A similar number, representing extinct fishes, have been taken, with the kind permission of the author, from Owen’s “ Palzeontology” My best thanks are due also to the Committee of Publications of the Zoological Society, and to the Editors of the “ Annals and Magazine of - Natural History,” and of the “Journal des Museum Godeffroy,” for the loan of woodcuts illustrating some of my papers on South American fishes and on larval forms. The remainder of the illustrations (about three-fourths) are either original figures, or formed part of the article on ‘Ichthyology’ in the former edition of the ‘ Encyclopeedia Britannica.” Lonpon, 3d October 1880. CONTENTS. — . INTRODUCTORY REMARKS. PAGE FISH DEFINED—ICHTHYOLOGY DEFINED . 3 A : ] CHAPTER I. HISTORY AND LITERATURE . ‘ : : ‘ é 2 Aristotle, 2—Belon, 4—Salviani, 5—Rondelet, 6—Faunists and Anatomists of the Seventeenth Century, 7—Ray and Willughby, 8—Artedi, 9—Linneus, 10—Gronow and Klein, 12—Pupils and Successors of Linneeus, 12—Bloch, 183—Lacépede, 15— Anatomists and Faunists preceding Cuvier, 16—Cuvier, 17— Agassiz, 20—J. Miiller, 22—Discovery of Ceratodus, 25—Recent publications on Fishes, 26—Latest systematic works, 33. CHAPTER II. TOPOGRAPHICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE EXTERNAL PARTS OF FISHES ; : , ‘ : ; ’ ie Boo Form of the body, 35—External parts of the head, 36—Trunk and Tail, 39—Fins ; their structure, position, and function, 40— Skin and Scales, 45. CHAPTER III. TERMINOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SKELETON iD Axial portion, 51—Vertebra and its parts ; terms defined, 51— Skull ; bones topographically enumerated, 53—Bones of the limbs, 59—Synonymic list of bones, 59. Vil CONTENTS. CHAPTERSLY. PAGE MODIFICATIONS OF THE SKELETON : : : , 63 Branchiostoma, 63 —Cyclostomes, 64 —Chondropterygians, 66 — Holocephali, 70—Ganoids, 71—Dipnoi, 71—Chondrostei, 74— Polypteroidei, 77 —Lepidosteoidei, 80—Amioidei, 82—Teleostei, 83—Classification of the bones of the Teleosteous skull accord- ing to the vertebral doctrine, 85—their morphological classifi- cation, 86—Limb-bones of Teleosteans, 92. CHAPTER V. Myouocy . : 2 f : : : ; : 93 General arrangement of the Muscles, 93—Electric organs, 94. CHAPTER VI. NEUROLOGY : : : . ; ; ; . 96 Of Branchiostoma, 96—Spinal chord, 96—Brain, its size, 97— Brain of Osseous fishes, 97—of Ganoids, 98—of Chondroptery- gians, 100—of Cyclostomes, 101—Spino-cerebral nerves, 103 -—Spinal nerves, 107—Sympathic system, 108. CHAPTER Vil, THE ORGANS OF SENSE : : ‘ ; ; 109 Smell, 109--Sight, 111—Hearing ; connection of the ear with the air-bladder, 116—Taste, 119—Touch, 120. CHAPTER VIII. THE ORGANS OF NUTRITION AND DIGESTION . : Sy LAL Food and mode of feeding, 121—Buccal and abdominal cavities and their openings, 123—Mouth and tongue, 123—Forms, texture, and arrangement of teeth, 124—Intestinal tract, 127—Liver, 132—Pancreas, 133—Spleen, 133. CONTENTS. CHAPTER, IX: ORGANS OF RESPIRATION Respiration, 135—Structure and arrangement of the gills, 136— Pseudobranchie, 140— Accessory respiratory organs, 142— Air-bladder ; its varieties, structure, and functions, 142. CHAPTER YX ORGANS OF CIRCULATION 5 , : > CHAPTER XL. URINARY ORGANS CHAPTER XII. ORGANS OF REPRODUCTION . Fishes are dioecious, 157—Hermaphroditism, 157—Oviparous and viviparous fishes, 157—Generative organs of Branchiostoma, 157—of Cyclostomes; their ova, 158—Female organs of Teleosteans and their ova, 158—TInstances of females taking care of their progeny, 160—Male organs of Teleosteans, 162— Instances of males taking care of their progeny, 163—Genera- tive organs of Ganoids, 163—of Chondropterygians and their ova, 166. CHAPTER XIII. GROWTH AND VARIATION OF FISHES Changes of form of the body or certain parts, normally accompany- ing growth, 170—Changes dependent on sexual development, 176—Secondary sexual differences, 176—Mixogamous, poly- gamous, and monogamous fishes, 177—Hybridism as a cause of variation, 178—Regular and irregular growth of fishes, 178 —Leptocephali not a normal state of development, 179— Changes of colour of the muscles and external parts ; chroma- tophors, 182—Albinism, 183. be PAGE 135 150 155 15 1 d 0 x CONTENTS. CHAPTER XIV. DOMESTICATED AND ACCLIMATISED FISHES, ETC. Domesticated fishes, 185—Acclimatisation of fishes, 185—Artificial impregnation of ova, 186—Tenacity of life, 186—Reproduction of lost parts, 188—Hybernation, 188—Useful fishes, 189— Poisonous fishes, 189—Poison-organs, 190. CHAPTER XV. DISTRIBUTION OF FISHES IN TIME : : ; Oldest fish-remains, 193—Devonian fishes, 194— Carboniferous, 196—Permian, 197—Triassic, 197—Liassic, 198—Oolitic, 199 —Cretaceous, 199—Tertiary, 200—Post-pliocene, 201. CHAPTER XVI. Tue DISTRIBUTION OF EXISTING FISHES OVER THE EARTH’S SURFACE.—GENERAL REMARKS Freshwater-, Marine-, and Brackish-water Fishes, 202—-Changes of the habitat of numerous fishes, active, 203—or dependent on geological changes, 204—Agencies operating upon the distri- bution of Freshwater and Marine fishes, 205. CHAPTER XVII. THE DISTRIBUTION OF FRESHWATER FISHES. List of Freshwater Fishes, 208—Continuous and interrupted range of distribution, 209—The ways of dispersal of Freshwater fishes, 211—A wide range of a type is not necessarily proof of its antiquity, 212—Each fauna is composed of ancient, autoch- thont, and immigrant species, 213—Division of the globe into zoological regions ; freshwater fishes have been spread in cireumpolar zones, 215—Cyprinide and Siluride, most im- portant families in recognising the zoo-geographical regions, 216—Division of the faune of Freshwater fishes, 217 —I. Equatorial Zone, 218—Indian Region, 220—African Region, 227 —Tropical American or Neotropical Region, 2833—Tropical Pacific Region, 238—II. Northern Zone, 240—Kuropo-Asiatic or Palearctic Region, 243— North American or Nearctic Region, 246—III. Southern Zone, with Tasmanian, New Zealand, and Fuegian Sub-regions, 248. 1 bo 93 CONTENTS. CHAPTER XVIII. THE FISHES OF THE BRACKISH WATER CHAPTER XIX. THE DISTRIBUTION OF MARINE FISHES : Shore-fishes, Pelagic, and Deep-sea fishes, 255—List of Shore-fishes, 257—Oceanic ares as determined by Shore-fishes, 259—Distri- bution of Shore-fishes compared with that of Freshwater-fishes, 260—I. Arctic Ocean, 261—II. Northern Temperate Zone, 262 —Temperate North-Atlantic, 262—with British, 263—Medi- terranean, 264—and North American districts, 266—Temperate North-Pacific, 268—with Kamtschatkan, 269—Japanese, 270 —and Californian districts, 271—III. Hquatorial Zone, 272— with Tropical Atlantic, 278—Indo-Pacific Ocean, 278—and the Pacific Coasts of Tropical America, 279—IV. Southern Temperate Zone, 281—with the Cape of Good Hope, 283— South Australia and New Zealand, 283—Chile, 288—and Patagonia, 289—V. Antarctic Ocean, 289. CHAPTER XxX. DISTRIBUTION OF PELAGIC FISHES CHAPTER XXI. THE FISHES OF THE DEEP SEA Deep-sea fishes a recent discovery, 296—Physical conditions affect- ing these fishes, 297—Characteristics of Deep-sea fishes, 299— Their vertical and horizontal distribution, 304—List of Deep- sea fishes, 305. PAGE 251 255 SYSTEMATIC AND DESCRIPTIVE PART. First SUB-CLASS—PALAICHTHYES. First ORDER—CHONDROPTERYGII I. Plagiostomata A. Selachoidei—Sharks Families: Carchariidz (Blue Shark, Tope, Hammer-head, Hound), 316—Lamnide (Porbeagle, Carcharodon, Fox-Shark, Basking-Shark), 319 — Rhinodontide, 323—Notidanide, 324—Scylliide (Dog-fishes), 325 Hybodontide, 328—Cestraciontide (Port Jackson Shark), 328—Spinacide (Spiny Dogs, Greenland Shark), 330—Rhinide, 334—Pristiophoride, 335. B. Batoidei—Rays : ; Families: Pristidz (Saw-fishes) 8336—Rhinobatide, 337 —Torpedinide (Electric Rays), 338—Rajide (Rays and Skates), 340—Trygonide (Sting Rays), 342— Myliobatide (Eagle Rays), 344. Il. Holocephala Family ; Chimeride, 348. SECOND ORDER—GANOIDEI I. Placodermi II. Acanthodini III. Dipnoi Families: Sirenide (Lepidosiren, Protopterus, Cera- todus), 355 —Ctenododipteride, 359 — Phanero- pleuride, 360. IV. Chondrostei Families: Acipenseride (Sturgeons), 360—Polyodontide, 362. PAGE 313 313 314 335 348 350 351 355 355 360 CONTENTS. V. Polypteroidea . Families : Polypteride, 364—Saurodipteride, 365— Coelacanthide, 365—Holoptychide, 365. VI. Pycnodontoider Families: Pleurolepide, 366—Pycnodontide, 366. VII. Lepidosteoider Families: Lepidosteide, 367—Sauride, 368— Stylo- dontide, 368—Spherodontide, 368 — Aspidorhyn- chide, 369—Paleoniscide, 369—Platysomide, 370. VIII. Amioider . Families: Caturide, 371—Leptolepide, 371—Amiide (Bow-fin), 371. Second SUB-CLASS—TELEOSTEI. First ORDER—ACANTHOPTERYGII I. A. perciformes Families: Percide (Freshwater-Perches, Bass, Sea- Perches, Centrarchus), 375—Squamipinnes (Coral- Fishes), 397—Mullide (Red-Mullets), 403—Sparide (Sea-breams), 405 — Hoplognathide, 410 — Cirrhi- tide, 410—Scorpenide, 412—Nandidex, 418—Poly- centride, 418—Teuthidide, 418. Il. A. beryciformes Family : Berycide, 420. Ill. A. kurtiformes . Family : Kurtide, 424. IV. A. polynemiformes Family : Polynemide, 425. . A. sciceniformes , Family : Scienide Clea), 426. VI. A. xiphiiformes Family : Xiphiide (Sword- dana 431. VII. A. trichiuriformes : : : Families : Trichiuride cnaere rae Hair-tails), 483 —Paleorhynchide, 437. xl PAGE 363 366 367 370 374 374 419 433 X1V CONTENTS. PAGE VIII. A. cotto-scombriformes : 438 Families: Acronuride (Surgeons), 438 — Carangide (Horse - Mackerels, Pilot - fish, Boar - fish), 440 — Cyttide (John Dorey), 450—Stromateide, 452 — Coryphenide (Dolphin, Sun-fish), 452—Nomeide, 455—Scombride (Mackerel, Tunny, Bonito, Alba- core, Sucking-fish), 456—Trachinide (Stare-gazer, Weever, etc.), 462—Malacanthide, 467—Batrach- ide, 467—Psychrolutide, 469—Pediculati (Angler, Antennarius, ete.), 469—Cottide (Bull-heads, Gur- nards), 476—Cataphracti (Flying Gurnards), 480— Pegaside, 482. IX. A. gobiiformes ‘ 4 ; : . 483 Families: Discoboli (Lump-suckers), 483 — Gobiide (Gobies, Dragonets), 485. X. A. blenniiformes : : . 490 Families : Cepolidee (Band-fishes), 490—Trichonotide, 490—Heterolepidotide, 491— Blenniide (Wolf-fish, Blennies), 492—Acanthoclinide, 498—Mastacem- belidee, 499. XI. A. mugiliformes 499 Families : Sphyrenidee (Badtedaash 490—Atherinides (Atherines), 500—Mugilide (Mullets), 501. XII. A. gastrosteiformes : : . 504 Families: Gastrosteide (Stickle- bast, noes iidz (Flute-mouths), 507. XIII. A. centrisciformes 508 Family : Centriscide, 508. XIV. A. gobiesociformes 510 Family : Gobiesocide, 512. XV. A. channiformes 3 : : ‘ : . 513 Family : Ophiocephalide, 513. XVI. A. labyrinthibranchii . 514 Families : Labyrinthici (Climbing Pate our 514 —Luciocephalide, 519. XVII. A. lophotiformes 519 Family : Lophotide, 519. CONTENTS. XV XVIII. A. teniiformes . : : , . 520 Family : Trachypteride (Ribbon- fishes), 520. XIX. A. notacanthiformes . : . : : . 523 Family : Notacanthidie, 523. SECOND ORDER—ACANTHOPTERYGIL PHARYNGOGNATHI . 523 Families: Pomacentridse (Coral-fishes), 524—Labridz (Wrasses, Parrot-wrasses), 525—Embiotocide, 533 —Chromides, 534. THIRD ORDER—ANACANTHINI : d ‘ : ES sir I, A. gadoidet é ; ; ; ; >| Oo Families: Lycodide, 537—Gadide (Cod-fishes, Hake, Burbot, Ling, Rockling, Torsk), 539—Ophidiide (Brotula, Fierasfer, Sand-eel, Congrogadus), 546— Macruride, 551. II. A. plewronectoider ‘ ; : . 553 Family : Pleuronectide (Flat- fishes), 553. FourTH ORDER—PHYSOSTOMI \ A : f . 559 Families : Siluridee ; their skeleton, 559—divided into eight sub- divisions and sixteen groups ; Clariina, 563—Plotosina, 563— Silurina, 565—Hypophthalmina, 566—Bagrina, 567—Amiur- ina, 567—Pimelodina, 568—Ariina, 569—Doradina, 572— Rhinoglanina, 573—Malapterurina (Electric Catfish), 574— Hypostomatina (Prefiadillas, Loricaria, ete. ), 575—Aspredin- ina, 580—Nematogenyina and Trichomycterina, 581—Stego- pholina, 581. Families of Physostomi continued: Scopelide, 582—Cyprinidce (Carps), 587—divided into fourteen groups, viz. Catostomina (Suckers), 588—Cyprinina (Carp, Crucian Carp, Goldfish, Barbels, Gudgeons), 589—Rohteichthyina, 596— Leptobar- bina, 597—Rasborina, 597—Semiplotina, 598—Xenocypri- dina, 598—Leuciscina (White fish, Tench, Dace, etc.), 598— Rhodeina, 601— Danionina, 601 — Hypophthalmichthyina, 602—Abramidina (Bream, Bleak), 602—Homalopterina, 604 —Cobitidina (Loaches), 604. Families of Physostomi continued: Kneriide, 606—Characinide, 606—Cyprinodontide, 613—Heteropygii (Blind Fish of the Mammoth Cave), 618—Umbride, 619—Scombresocide (Gar- Xvl1 CONTENTS. pike, Saury, Half-beak, Flying Fish), 619—Esocide (Pike), 623 — Galaxiide, 624—Mormyride, 625 — Sternoptychide, 627—Stomiatide, 629. Families of Physostomi continued—Salmonide : Salmo, difficulty of distinguishing species, 630; constant specific characters, 635 — hybrids, 638—vsexual development, 638 — migratory species and their retention in freshwater, 639—Growth of Salmonoids, 641—their domestication and acclimatisation, 641—species enumerated, 642—Smelt and Capelin, 646—Cor- egonus, 647—-Grayling, 649—marine genera, 650. Families of Physostomi continued: Percopside, 651—Haplochi- tonide, 651—Gonorhynchide, 652—Hyodontide (Moon-eye), 653 — Pantodontide, 653 —Osteoglosside, 653 — Clupeide (Herrings, Anchovies, Shads, Mossbanker, Menhaden, etc. ), 655—Bathythrisside, 663—Chirocentride, 663—Alepocepha- lide, 664—Notopteride, 664—Halosauride, 665—Hoplopleu- ride, 665—Gymnotide (Electric Eel), 666—Symbranchide, 668—Murenide (Eels, Congers, Murenas, etc. ), 669. FrrrH OrDER— LOPHOBRANCHII Families : Solenostomide, 678 —Syngnathide (Pipe-fishes, Sea- horses), 679. SrxtTH ORDER—PLECTOGNATHI Families: Sclerodermi (File-fishes, Coffer-fishes), 684 — Gymno- dontes (Globe-fishes, Sunfish), 686. ‘ THIRD SUB-CLASS—-CYCLOSTOMATA. Families: Petromyzontide (Lampreys), 691—Myxinide, 694. FourtH SuB-CLASS—-LEPTOCARDII. Family : Cirrhostomi (Lancelets), 696. APPENDIX. DIRECTIONS FOR COLLECTING AND PRESERVING FISHES ALPHABETICAL INDEX . PAGE 678 683 697 707 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS. ae ee ACCORDING to the views generally adopted at present, all those Vertebrate animals are referred to the Class of Fishes, which living in water, breathe air dissolved in water by means of gills or branchize ; whose heart consists of a single ventricle and single atrium; whose limbs, if present, are modified into fins, supplemented by unpaired, median fins; and whose skin is either naked, or covered with scales or osseous plates or bucklers. With few exceptions fishes are oviparous. How- ever, there are not a few members of this Class which show a modification of one or more of these characteristics, as we shall see hereafter, and which, nevertheless, cannot be separated from it. The distinction between the Class of Fishes and that of Batrachians is very slight indeed. The branch of Zoology which treats of the internal and external structure of fishes, their mode of life, and their distribution in space and time, is termed Ichthyology.’ 1 From iy6us, fish, and Noyos, doctrine or treatise. B CHAPTER I. HISTORY AND LITERATURE. Aristotle. THE commencement of the history of Ichthyology coincides with that of Zoology generally. ARISTOTLE (384-322 B.C.) had a perfect knowledge of the general structure of fishes, which he clearly discriminates from the Aquatic animals with lungs and mamme, 7.e. Cetaceans, and from the various groups of Aquatic Invertebrates. He says that “the special charac- teristics of the true fishes consist in the branchize and fins, the majority having four fins, but those of an elongate form, as the eels, having two only. Some, as the Murena, lack the fins altogether. The Rays swim with their whole body, which is spread out. The branchiz are sometimes furnished with an opercle, sometimes without one, as is the case in the carti- laginous fishes. . . . No fish has hairs.or feathers ; most are covered with scales, but some have a rough or smooth skin. The tongue is hard, often toothed; and sometimes so much ~ adherent that it seems to be wanting. The eyes have no lids; nor are any ears or nostrils visible, for what takes the place of nostrils is a blind cavity. Nevertheless they have the senses of tasting, smelling, and hearmg. “All have blood. All scaly fishes are oviparous, but the cartilaginous fishes (with the exception of the Sea-devil, which Aristotle places along with them) are viviparous. All have a heart, liver, and gall- bladder; but kidneys and urinary bladder are absent. They vary much in the structure of their intestines: for whilst the mullet has a fleshy stomach like a bird, others have no HISTORY. a stomachic dilatation. Pyloric coeca are close to the stomach, variable in number; there are even some, like the majority of the cartilaginous fishes, which have none whatever. ‘Two bodies are situated along the spine, which have the function of testicles, and open towards the vent, and which are much enlarged in the spawning season. The scales become harder with age. Not being provided with lungs, they have no voice, but several can emit grunting sounds. They sleep like other animals. In the majority the females exceed the males in size; and in the Rays and Sharks the male is distinguished by an appendage on each side of the vent.” Aristotle’s information on the habits of fishes, their migra- tions, mode and time of propagation, utility, is, as far as it has been tested, surprisingly correct. Unfortunately, only too often we lack the means of recognising the species of which he gives a description. His ideas of specific distinction were as vague as those of the fishermen whose nomenclature he adopted ; it never occurred to him that such popular names are subject to change, or may be entirely lost with time, and the difficulty of deciphering his species is further increased by the circumstance that popular names are often applied by him to the same fish, or that different stages of growth are designated by distinct names. The number of fishes known to Aristotle seems to have been about 115, all of which are inhabitants of the Aigean Sea. That one man should have discovered so many truths, and formed so sure a base for Zoology, is less surprising than the fact that for about eighteen centuries a science which seemed to offer particular attractions to men gifted with power of observation, was no farther advanced. Yet this is the case. Aristotle’s disciples, as well as his successors, remained satis- fied to be his copiers or commentators, and to collect fabulous stories or vague notions. With very few exceptions (such as Ausonius, who wrote a small poem, in which he describes Belon. 4 FISHES. from his own observations the fishes of the Mosel) authors entirely abandoned original research. And it was not until about the middle of the sixteenth century that Ichthyolog made a new step in advance by the appearance of Selon, Rondelet, and Salviani, who almost simultaneously published their grand works, by which the idea of species was established definitely and for all times. P. Beton travelled in the countries bordering on the eastern part of the Mediterranean, in the years 1547-50; he collected rich stores of positive knowledge, which he deposited in several works. The one most important for the progress of Ichthyology is that entitled “De aquatilibus lbri duo” (Paris 1553; small 4to.) Belon knows about 110 fishes, of which he gives rude, but generally recognisable, figures. In his descriptions he pays regard to the classical as well as vernacular nomenclature, and states the outward character- istics, sometimes even the number of fin-rays, frequently also the most conspicuous anatomical peculiarities. Although Belon but rarely gives definitions of the terms used by him, it is generally not very difficult to ascertain the limits which he intended to assign to each division of aquatic animals. He very properly divides them into such as are provided with blood, and into those without it: two divisions, called in modern language Vertebrate and Invertebrate aquatic animals. The former are classified by him according to sizes, the further subdivisions being based on the structure of the skeleton, mode of propagation, number of limbs, form of the body, and on the physical character of the localities inhabited by fishes. This classification is as follows :-— I. The larger fishes or Cetaceans. A. Viviparous Cetaceans with bony skeletons ( = Cetacea). B. Viviparous Amphibians. HISTORY. 5 1. With four limbs: Seals, Hippopotamus, Beaver, Otter, and other aquatic Mammalia. 2. With two limbs: Mermaids, ete. C. Oviparous Amphibians (= Reptiles and Frogs). D. Viviparous Cartilaginous fishes. 1. Of an oblong form (= Sharks). 2. Of a flat form (= Rays and Lophius). E. Oviparous Cartilaginous fishes (= Sturgeons and Silurus). F. Oviparous Cetaceans, with spines instead of bones (= large marine fishes, like the Thunny, Sword-fish, Scizenoids, Bass, Gadoids, Trachypterus). II. Spinous Oviparous fishes of a flat form (= Pleuronectide). III. Fishes of a high form, like Zeus. IV. Fishes of a snake-like form (= Eels, Belone, Sphyrzna). V. Small Oviparous, spinous, scaly, marine fishes, 1. Pelagic kinds. 2. Littoral kinds. 3. Kinds inhabiting rocky localities. VI. Fluviatile and Lacustrine fishes. The work of the Roman ichthyologist, H. SALVIANI (1514- 72), is characteristic of the high social position which the author held as the physician of three popes. Its title is “ Aquatilium animalium historia” (Rom. 1554-57, fol.) It treats exclusively of the fishes of Italy. Ninety-two species are figured on seventy-six plates which, as regards artistic execution, are masterpieces of that period, although those specific characteristics which now-a-days constitute the value of a zoological drawing, were entirely overlooked by the author or artist. No attempt is made at a natural classifica- tion, but the allied forms generally are placed in close proxi- mity. The descriptions are quite equal to those given by Belon, entering much into the details of the economy and usefulness of the several species, and were evidently composed with the view of collecting in a readable form all that might Salviani. Rondelet. 6 FISHES. prove of interest to the class of society in which the author moved. Salviani’s work is of a high standard, most remarkable for the age in which he lived. It could not fail to convey valu- able instruction, and to render Ichthyology popular in the country to the fauna of which it was devoted, but it would not have advanced Ichthyology as science generally ; and in this respect Salviani is not to be compared with Rondelet or Belon. G. RonpeLer (1507-1557) had the great advantage over Belon in having received a medical education at Paris, and more especially in having gone through a complete course of instruction in anatomy as a pupil of Guentherus of Andernach. This is conspicuous throughout his works—“ Libri de Piscibus marinis” (Lugd. 1554, fol.) ; and “ Universe aquatilium his- tori pars altera” (Lugd. 1555, fol.) Nevertheless they cannot be regarded as more than considerably enlarged editions of Belon’s work. For although he worked independently of the latter, and differs from him in numerous details, the system adopted by him is characterised by the same absence of the true principles of classification. Rondelet had a much more extensive knowledge of details. His work is almost entirely limited to European, and chiefly Mediterranean, forms, and comprises not less than 197 marine and 47 fresh- water fishes. His descriptions are more complete and his figures much more accurate than those of Belon; and the specific account is preceded by introductory chapters in which he treats in a general manner on the distinctions, the external and internal parts, and on the economy of fishes. Like Belon, he had no conception of the various categories of classification—for instance, confounding throughout his work the terms “genus” and “species ;” but he had intuitively a notion of what his successors called a “species,” and his principal object was to collect and give as much information as possible of such species. HISTORY. vf For nearly a century the works of Belon and Rondelet remained the standard works of Ichthyology ; but this science did not remain stationary during this period. The attention of naturalists was now directed to the products of foreign countries, especially the Spanish and Dutch possessions in the New World; and in Europe the establishment of anatomical schools and academies led to the careful investigation of the internal anatomy of the most remarkable European forms. Limited as these efforts were as to their scope, being directed either only to the fauna of some district, or to the dissection of a single species, they were sufficiently numerous to enlarge the views of naturalists, and to destroy that fatal dependency on preceding authorities which had continued to keep in bonds the minds of even such men as Rondelet and Belon. The most noteworthy of those who were active in tropical W. Piso. countries are W. Piso and G. Marcrav. They accompanied ee as physicians the Dutch Governor, Prince Moritz of Nassau, to Brazil (1637-44). Marerav especially studied the fauna of the country, and although he died before his return to Europe, his observations were published by his colleague, and em- bodied in a work “ Historia naturalis Brazilie ” (Lugd. 1648, fol.), in which the fourth book treats of the fishes. He de- scribes about 100 species, all of which had been previously unknown, in a manner far superior to that of his predecessors. The accompanying figures are not good, but nearly always recognisable, and giving a fair idea of the form of the fish. Marerav himself, with the aid of an artist, had made a most valuable collection of coloured drawings of the objects observed and described by him, but many years were allowed to pass before it was scientifically utilised by Bloch and others. Of the men who left records of their anatomical researches, Anato- we may mention BorELit (1608-79), who wrote a work “De es motu animalium” (Rom. 1680, 4to), in which he explained the mechanism of swimming, and the function of the air- ‘ Ray and Willughby 8 FISHES. bladder; M. Mauprcut (1628-94), who examined the optic nerve of the sword-fish; the celebrated J. SWAMMERDAM (1637-80), who described the intestines of numerous fishes ; and J. DuverNey (1648-1730), who entered into detailed re- searches of the organs of respiration. A new era in the history of Ichthyology commences with Ray, Willughby, and Artedi, who were the first to recognise the true principles by which the natural affinities of animals should be determined. Their labours stand in so intimate a connection with each other that they represent only one stride in the progress of this science. J. Ray (born 1628 in Essex, died 1705), was the friend and guide of F. WintLuGHBY (1635-72). They had recognised that a thorough reform of the treatment of the vegetable and animal kingdoms had become necessary; that the only way of bringing order into the existing chaos was that of arranging the various forms with regard to their structure; that they must cease to be burdened with inapplicable passages and quotations of the ancient writers, and to perpetuate the erroneous or vague notions of their predecessors. They aban- doned speculation, and adhered to facts only. One of the first results, and perhaps the most important, of their method was, that having recognised the “species” as such, they defined this term, and fixed it as the base, from which all sound zoological knowledge has to start. Although they had divided their work thus that Ray attended to the plants principally, and Willughby to the animals, the “Historia piscium” (Oxford, 1686, fol.), which bears Willughby’s name on the titlepage, and was edited by Ray, is clearly their joint production. A great part of the observations contained in it were collected during their com- mon journeys in Great Britain and on the Continent, and it is no exaggeration to say that at that time these two English- HISTORY. 9 men knew the fishes of the Continent, especially those of Germany, better than any other Continental zoologist. By the definition of fishes as animals with blood, breath- ing by gills, provided with a single ventricle of the heart, covered with scales or naked; the Cetaceans are excluded. Yet, at a later period Ray appears to have been afraid of so great an innovation as the separation of whales from fishes, | and, therefore, he invented a definition of fish which com- ; prises both. The fishes proper are then arranged in the first place according to the cartilaginous or osseous nature of the skeleton ; further subdivisions being formed with regard to the general form of the body, the presence or absence of ventral fins, the soft or spinous structure of the dorsal rays, the number of dorsal fins, etc. Not less than 420 species are thus arranged and described, of which about 180 were known to the authors from autopsy: a comparatively small propor- tion, descriptions and figures still forming at that time in a ereat measure a substitute for collections and museums. With the increasing accumulation of forms the want of a fixed nomenclature is now more and more felt. Peter ARTEDI would have been a great ichthyologist if P. Artedi. Ray or Willughby had never preceded him. But he was fully conscious of the fact that both had prepared the way for him, and therefore he derived all possible advantages from their works. Born in 1705 in Sweden, he studied with Lin- neus at Upsala; from an early period he devoted himself entirely to the study of fishes, and was engaged in the arrangement and description of the ichthyological collection of Seba, a wealthy Dutchman who had formed the then perhaps richest museum, when he was accidentally drowned in one of the canals of Amsterdam in the year 1734, at an age of twenty- nine years. His manuscripts were fortunately rescued by an Englishman, Cliffort, and edited by his early friend Linneus. Linneus. 10 FISHES. The work is divided into the following parts :— 1. In the “ Bibliotheca Ichthyologica ” Artedi gives a very complete list of all preceding authors who have written on fishes, with a critical analysis of their works. 2. The “Philosophia Ichthyologica ” is devoted to a descrip- tion of the external and internal parts of fishes; Artedi fixes a precise terminology of all the various modifications of the organs, distinguishes between those characters which determine a genus and such as indicate a species or merely a variety ; in fact he establishes the method and principles which subse- quently have guided every systematic ichthyologist. 3. The “Genera Piscium ” contains well-defined diagnoses of forty-five genera, for which he fixes an unchangeable nomenclature. 4, In the “Species Piscium ” descriptions of seventy-two species, examined by himself, are given; descriptions which even now are models of exactitude and method. 5. Finally, in the “Synonymia Piscium” references to all previous authors are arranged for every species, very much in the same manner which is adopted in the systematic works of the present day. Artedi has been justly called the Father of Ichthyology. So perfect was his treatment of the subject, that even LINNZUS could no more improve it, only modify and add to it; and as far as Ichthyology is concerned, Linnzeus has scarcely done anything beyond applying binominal terms to the species properly described and classified by Artedi. Artedi had divided the fishes proper into four orders, viz. Malacopterygii, Acanthopterygvi, Branchiostegi, and Chondro- pterygri, of which the third only, according to our present knowledge, appears to be singularly heterogeneous, as it com- prises Balistes, Ostracion, Cyclopterus, and Lophius. Linnzeus, besides separating the Cetaceans entirely from the class of fishes (at least since the 10th edition of the “Systema Nature”) HISTORY. 11 abandoned Artedi’s order of Branchiostegi, but substituted a scarcely more natural combination by joining it with Artedi’s Chondropterygians, under the name of “ Amphibia nantes.” His classification of the genera appears in the 12th edition of the “ Systema,” thus— AMPHIBIA NANTES. PIscES THORACICI. Spiraculis compositis. Cepola. Echeneis. USLEIN HONE Corypheena. Raia. Gobius. es) Cottus. Chimera. Scorpeena. : ? ye Zeus. Spiraculis solitariis. Bicunonected: Lophius. Cheetodon. Acipenser. Sparus. Cyclopterus. Labrus. Balistes. Scizena. Ostracion. Perea. Tetrodon. Gasterosteus. Diodon. Scomber. Centriscus. Mullus, Syngnathus. . Trigla. Pegasus. Pisces ABDOMINALES. Pisces APODES. Cobitis. Murena, Amia. Gymnotus. Silurus. Trichiurus. Teuthis. Anarhichas. Loricaria. Ammodytes. Salmo. Ophidium. Fistularia. Stromateus. Esox. Xiphias. Elops. Argentina. Atherina. PISCES JUGULARES. Mugil. Callionymus. Mormyrus. Uranoscopus. Exoccetus. Trachinus. Polynemus. Gadus. Clupea. Blennius. Cyprinus. Gronow and Klein. Pupils and Successors of Linnzus 12 FISHES. Two contemporaries, of Zinneus attempted a systematic arrangement of fishes; both had considerable opportunities for their study, especially in possessing extensive collections ; but neither exercised any influence on the progress of Ichthy- ology. The one, L. T. Gronow, a German who resided in Holland, closely followed the arrangements proposed by Artedi and Linnzeus, and increased the number of genera and species from the contents of his own museum. He published two works, “Museum Ichthyologicum” (Lugd. 1754-6, fol.), and “ Zoophylacium” (Lugd. 1763-81, fol.) ; a posthumous work, containing numerous excellent descriptions of new forms was published by J. E. Gray in 1854 under the title of “Systema Ichthyologicum.” To Gronow also is due the invention of pre- paring flat skins of fishes in a dry state, and preserving them in the manner of a herbarium. The specimens thus prepared by him belong to the oldest which have been preserved down to our time. Much less important are the ichthyological labours of J.T. KiEtn (1685-1759). They are embodied in five parts (Missus) of a work entitled “ Historia naturalis piscium” (Sede, 1740-9, 4to.) He regarded a system merely as the means of recognising the various forms of animals, not as the expression of their natural affinities ; and that method seemed to him to be the most perfect by which an animal could be most readily determined. He eschewed all reference to minute or anatomical characters. Hence his system is a series of the most unnatural combinations, and we cannot be surprised that Linnzeus passed in silence over Klein’s labours. The works of Artedi and Linneus excited fresh activity, more especially in Scandinavia, Holland, Germany, and England, such as has not been equalled in the history of biological science either before or after. Whilst some of the pupils and followers of Linnzeus devoted themselves to an HISTORY. 13 examination and study of the fauna of their native countries, others proceeded on voyages of discovery to foreign and distant countries. Of these latter the following may be specially mentioned :—0O, Fabricius worked out the Fauna of Greenland, Kalm collected in North America, Hasselquist in Egypt and Palestine, Briinnich in the Mediterranean, Osbeck in Java and China, Thwnberg in Japan; Forskal examined and described the fishes of the Red Sea; Steller, Pallas, S. T. Gmelin, and Giéildenstedt traversed nearly the whole of the Russian Empire in Europe and Asia. Others attached themselves as naturalists to the celebrated circumnavigators of the last cen- tury, like the two orsters (father and son), and Solander, who accompanied Cook; Commerson, who travelled with Bougain- ville; and Sonnerat. Numerous new and startling forms were discovered by those men, and the foundation was laid of the knowledge of the geographical distribution of animals. Of those who studied the fishes of their native country the most celebrated are Pennant (Great Brita), 0. F. Miiller (Denmark), Duhamel (France), Meidinger (Austria), Cornide (Spain), Parra (Cuba). The materials brought together by those and other zoolo- gists were so numerous that, not long after the death of Linnzeus, the necessity was felt of collecting them in a com- pendious form. Several compilators undertook this task ; they embodied the recent discoveries in new editions of Artedi’s and Linné’s classical works, but not possessing either a knowledge of the subject or any critical discernment, they only succeeded in covering those noble monuments under a mass of confused rubbish. For Ichthyology it was fortunate that two men at least, Bloch and Lacépéde, made it a subject of long and original research. Mark Exiezer Biocu, born in the year 1723 at Anspach M. E. . : aoe: : loch. in Germany, practised as a physician in Berlin; he had reached 14 FISHES, an age of fifty-six years when he commenced to write on ichthyological subjects. To commence at his age a work in which he intended not only to give full descriptions of the species known to him from specimens or drawings, but also to illustrate every species in a style truly magnificent for his time, was an undertaking of the execution of which an ordinary man would have despaired. Yet he accomplished not only this task, but even more, as we shall see hereafter. His work consists of two divisions :— 1. “Oeconomische Naturgeschichte der Fische Deutsch- lands” (Berl. 1782-4, 4to. Plates in fol.) | 2. “Naturgeschichte der auslendischen Fische” (Berl. 1785-95, 4to. Plates in fol.) Bloch’s work is unique, and probably will for ever remain so. Although Cuvier fifty years later undertook a similar general work on fishes, the subject had then become too ex- tensive to allow of an attempt of giving illustrations of all the species, or illustrations of a similar size and costliness. The first division of the work, which is devoted to a de- scription of the fishes of Germany, is entirely original, and based upon Bloch’s own observations. His descriptions as well as figures were made from nature, and are, with but few exceptions, still serviceable; many continue to be the best existing in literature. Bloch was less fortunate and is much less reliable in his natural history of foreign fishes. For many of the species he had to rely on more or less incorrect drawings and de- scriptions of travellers ; frequently, also, he was deceived as to the origin of specimens which he acquired by purchase. Hence his accounts contain numerous confusing errors which it would have been difficult to correct, if not nearly the whole of the materials on which his work is based had been pre- served in the collections at Berlin. After the completion of his Ichthyology Bloch occupied HISTORY. 15 himself with systematic work. He prepared a general system of fishes, in which he arranged not only those described in his great work, but also those with which he had become ac- quainted afterwards from the descriptions of others. The work was ably edited and published after Bloch’s death by a philologist, J. G. Schneider, under the title “M. E. Blochii Systema ichthyologiz iconibus cx. illustratum” (Berl. 1801, 8vo.) The number of species enumerated in it amounts to 1519. The system is based upon the number of the fins, the various orders being termed Hendecapterygui, Decapterygit, etc. We need not add that an artificial method like this led to the most unnatural combinations or severances. Bloch’s Ichthyology remained for many years the standard work, and, by the great number of excellent illustrations, proved a most useful guide to the student. But as regards originality of thought, Bloch was far surpassed by his con- temporary, B. G. E. DE LACEPEDE, born at Agen, in France, Lacépéde. in 1756, a man of great and general erudition, who died as Professor of the Museum of Natural History of Paris in 1826. Lacépede had to contend with great difficulties in the preparation of his “Histoire des Poissons” (Paris, 1798- 1803, 4to, in 5 vols.), which was written during the most dis- turbed period of the French Revolution. A great part of it was composed whilst the author was separated from collections and books, and had to rely on his notes and manuscripts only. Even the works of Bloch and other contemporaneous authors remained unknown, or at least inaccessible, to him for a long time. Therefore we cannot be surprised that his work abounds in all those errors to which a compiler is subject. The same species not only appears under two and more distinct specific names, but it sometimes happens that the author understands so little the source from which he derives his information that the description is referred to one genus and the accom- panying figure to another. The names of genera are unduly Anato- mists. Faunists. 16 FISHES. multiplied ; and the figures with which the work is illustrated are far inferior to those of Bloch. Thus the influence of Lacépéde on the progress of Ichthyology was infinitely less than that of his fellow-labourer; and the labour caused to his successors by correcting the numerous errors into which he has fallen, probably outweighs the assistance which they derived from his work. The work of the principal cultivators of Ichthyology in the period between Ray and Lacépéde was chiefly systematic and descriptive, but also the internal organisation of fishes received attention from more than one great anatomist. Haller, Camper, and Hunter, examined the nervous system and organs of sense; and more especially Alexander Monro (the son) published a classical work, “The Structure and Physiology of Fishes explained and compared with those of Man and other Animals” (Edinb. 1785, fol.) The electric organs of fishes (Torpedo and Gymnotus) were examined by Réaumur, Allamand, Bancroft, Walsh, and still more exactly by J. Hunter. The mystery of the propagation of the Eel called forth a large number of essays, and even the artificial propagation of Salmonide was known and practised by Gleditsch (1764). Bloch and Lacépéde’s works were almost immediately suc- ceeded by the labours of Cuvier, but his early publications were of necessity tentative, preliminary, and fragmentary, so that a short period elapsed before the spirit infused by this ereat anatomist into Ichthyology could exercise its influence on all workers in this field. Several of such antecuvierian works must be mentioned on account of their importance to our knowledge of certain Faunas: the “ Descriptions and Figures of Two Hundred Fishes collected at Vizagapatam on the coast of Coromandel” (Lond. 1803; 2 vols. in fol.), by Patrick Russel ; and“ An Account of the Fishes found in the River Ganges and its branches” (Edinb. 1822; 2 vols. in HISTORY. 17 4to), by F. Hamilton (formerly Buchanan)—works distin- guished by a greater accuracy of their drawings (especially in the latter), than was ever attained before. A “Natural His- tory of British Fishes” was published by &. Donovan (Lond. 8vo, 1802-8) ; and the Mediterranean Fauna formed the study of the lifetime of A. Risso (“Ichthyologie de Nice.” Paris, 1810, 8vo ; and “ Histoire naturelle de ? Europe Meridionale.” Paris, 1827, 8vo). A slight beginning in the description of the fishes of the United States was made by S. LZ. Mitchell, who published, besides various papers, a “ Memoir on the Ichthyology of New York,” in 1815. G. Cuvier did not occupy himself with the study of fishes G. Cuvier. merely because this class formed part of the “ Régne animal,” but he devoted himself to it with particular predilection. The investigation of their anatomy, and especially of their skeleton, was taken up by him at an early period, and con- tinued until he had succeeded in completing so perfect a frame- work of the system of the whole class that his immediate successors could content themselves with filling up those details for which their master had no leisure. Indefatigable in exam- ining all the external and internal characters of the fishes of a rich collection, he ascertained the natural affinities of the in- finite variety of fishes, and accurately defined the divisions, orders, families, and genera of the class, as they appear in the various editions of the “Regne animal.” His industry equalled his genius: he opened connections with almost every accessible part of the globe; not only French travellers and naturalists, but also Germans, Englishmen, Americans, rivalled one another to assist him with collections ; and for many years the Muséum of the Jardin des Plantes was the centre where all ichthyological treasures were deposited. Thus Cuvier 1 Down to this period the history of Ichthyology is fully treated in the first volume of Cuvier and Valenciennes ‘‘ Hist. nat. d. Poiss.” C 18 FISHES. brought together a collection the lke of which had never been seen before, and which, as it contains all the materials on which his labours were based, must still be considered to be the most important. Soon after the year 1820, Cuvier, assisted by one of his pupils, A. VALENCIENNES, commenced his great work on fishes, “ Histoire naturelles des Poissons,” of which the first volume appeared in 1828. The earlier volumes, in which Cuvier himself took his share, bear evi- dence of the freshness and love with which both authors devoted themselves to their task. After Cuvier’s death in 1832 the work was left entirely in the hands of Valenciennes, whose energy and interest gradually slackened, to rise to the old standard in some parts only, as, for instance, in the treatise on the Herring. He left the work unfinished with the twenty- second volume (1848), which treats of the Salmonoids. Yet, incomplete as it is, it is indispensable to the student. There exist several editions of the work, which, however, have the same text. One, printed in 8vo, with coloured or plain figures, is the one in common use among ichthyologists. A more luxurious edition in 4to has a different pagination, and therefore is most inconvenient to use. As mentioned above, the‘various parts of the work are very unequally worked out. Many of the species are de- scribed in so masterly a manner that a greater excellency of method can hardly be conceived. The history of the litera- ture of these species is entered into with minuteness and critical discernment; but in the later volumes, numerous species are introduced into the system without any descrip- tion, or with a few words only, comparing a species with one or more of its congeners. Cuvier himself, at a late period of his life, seems to have grown indifferent as to the exact defini- tion of his species: a failing commonly observed among Zoologists when attention to descriptive details becomes to them a tedious task. What is more surprising is, that a man HISTORY. 19 of his anatomical and physiological knowledge should have overlooked the fact that secondary sexual characters are developed in fishes as in any other class of animals, and that fishes undergo great changes during growth; and, consequently, that he described almost all such sexual forms and different stages of growth under distinct specific and even generic names, The system finally adopted by Cuvier is the following :— A. PoIssons OSSEUX. ].—A BRANCHIES EN PEIGNES OU EN LAMES. 1. A MACHOIRE SUPERIEURE LIBRE. Percoides. Polynemes. Mulles. Joues cuirassées. Scienoides. Abdominaux. Cyprinoides. Siluroides. Salmonoides, Clupeoides. Lucioides. a. Acanthoptérygiens. Sparoides. Branchies labyrinthiques, Chétodonoides. Lophioides. Scomberoides. Gobioides. Muges. Labroides. b. Malacoptérygiens. Subbrachiens. A podes. Sparoides. Murenoides. Pleuronectes. Discoboles, 2. A MACHOIRE SUPERIEURE FIXEE. Sclérodermes. Gymnodontes. II. A BRANCHIES EN FORME DE HOUPPES. Lophobranches. B. CARTILAGINEUX OU CHONDROPTERYGIENS. Sturioniens. Plagiostomes. Cyclostomes. We have to compare this system with that of Linnzus if we wish to measure the gigantic stride Ichthyology has made during the intervening period of seventy years. The various characters employed for classification have been ex- 20 FISHES. amined throughout the whole class, and their relative import- ance has been duly weighed and understood. Though Linneus had formed a category of “ Amphibia nantes” for fishes with a cartilaginous skeleton, which should coincide with Cuvier’s “ Poissons Cartilagineux,” he had failed to understand the very nature of cartilage, apparently comprising by this term any skeletal framework of less firmity than ordi- nary bone. Hence he considered Lophius, Cyclopterus, Syng- nathus to be cartilaginous fishes. Adopting the position and development of the ventral fins as a highly important charac- ter, he was obliged to associate fishes with rudimentary and inconspicuous ventral fins, like 7richiurus, Xiphias, ete., with the true Eels. The important category of a “family” appears now in Cuvier’s system fully established as that termediate between genus and order. Jmportant changes in Cuvier’s system have been made and proposed by his successors, but in the main it is still that of the present day. Cuvier had extended his researches beyond the living forms, into the field of paleontology ; he was the first to observe the close resemblance of the scales of the fossil Paleoniscus to those of the living Polypterus and Lepidosteus, the prolongation and identity of structure of the upper caudal lobe in Palwoniscus and the Sturgeons, the presence of peculiar “fulcra ” on the anterior margin of the dorsal fin in Paleoniscus and Lepidosteus: inferrmg from these facts that that fossil genus was allied either to the Sturgeons or to Lepidosteus. But it did not occur to him that there was a close relationship between those recent fishes. Zepidostews and, with it, the fossil genus remained in his system a member of the order of Malacopterygit abdominales. It was left to L. AGassiz (born 1807, died 1873) to point out the importance of the character of the structure of the scales, and to open a path towards the knowledge of a whole new sub-class of fishes, the Ganovdez. HISTORY. aL Impressed with the fact that the peculiar scales of Poly- pterus and Lepidosteus are common to all fossil osseous fishes down to the chalk, he takes the structure of the scales generally as the base for an ichthyological system, and distin- euishes four orders :— 1. Placoids.—Without scales proper, but with scales of enamel, sometimes large, sometimes small and reduced to mere points (Rays, Sharks, and Cyclostomi, with the fossil Hybodontes). 2. Ganoids—With angular bony scales, covered with a thick stratum of enamel: to this order belong the fossil Lepidoides, Sauroides, Pyecnodontes, and Coelacanthi; the recent Polypterus, Lepidosteus, Sclerodermi, Gymnodontes, Lophobranches, and Siluroides ; also the Sturgeons. 3. Ctenoids—With rough scales, which have their free margins denticulated : Cheetodontidee, Pleuronectide, Percide, Polyacanthi, Scisnidee, Sparidee, Scorpeenidze, Aulostomi. 4. Cycloids—With smooth scales, the hind margin of which lacks denticulation: Labride, Mugilidee, Scombridee, Gadoidei, Gobiide, Mureenide, Lucioidei, Salmonidee, Clupeidee, Cyprinidee. We have no hesitation in affirming that if Agassiz had had an opportunity of acquiring a more extensive and inti- mate knowledge of existing fishes before his energies were absorbed in the study of,their fossil remains, he himself would have recognised the artificial character of his classification. The distinctions between cycloid and ctenoid scales, between placoid and ganoid fishes are vague, and can hardly be main- tained. As far as the living and post-cretacean forms are concerned, the vantage-ground gained by Cuvier was aban- doned by him; and therefore his system could never supersede that of his predecessors, and finally shared the fate of every classification based on the modifications of one organ only. But Agassiz has the merit of having opened an immense new J. Miller. a2 FISHES. field of research by his study of the infinite variety of fossil forms. In his principal work, “ Recherches sur les Poissons fossiles,” (Neuchatel, 1833-43, 4to, atlas in fol.), he placed them before the world arranged in a methodical manner, with excellent descriptions and illustrations. His power of discern- ment and penetration in determining even the most frag- mentary remains is truly astonishing; and if his order of Ganoids is an assemblage of forms very different from that as it is circumscribed now, he was at any rate the first who recognised that such an order of fishes exists. The discoverer of the Ganoidei was succeeded by their explorer, JOHANNES MULLER (born 1801, died 1858). In his classical memoir “Ueber den Bau und die Grenzen der Ganoiden” (Berlin, 1846 ; 4to), he showed that the Ganoids differed from all the other osseous fishes, and agreed with the Plagiostomes, in the structure of their heart. By this primary character, all heterogeneous elements, as Stlwroids, Osteoglos- side, ete., were eliminated from the order as understood by Agassiz. On the other hand, he did not recognise the affinity of Lepidosiren to the Ganoids, but established for it a distinct sub-class, Dipnoi, which he placed at the opposite end of the system. By his researches into the anatomy of the Lam- preys and Amphioxus, their typical distinctness from other cartilaginous fishes was proved; they became the types of two other sub-classes, Cyclostomi and Leptocardi. Miiller proposed several other not unimportant modifica- tions of the Cuvierian system; and although all cannot be maintained as the most natural arrangements, yet his re- searches have given us a much more complete knowledge of the organisation of the Teleosteous fishes, and later en- quiries have shown that, on the whole, the combinations pro- posed by him require only some further modification and another definition to render them perfectly natural. HISTORY. 23 Under the name of Pharyngognathi he combined fishes with the lower pharyngeals coalesced into one bone, viz. the Labroids, Chromides, and Scombresoces. The association of the third family with the two former seemed to himself a somewhat arbitrary proceeding; and it had to be abandoned again, when a number of fishes which cannot be separated from the Acanthopterygians, were found to possess the same united pharyngeals. A more natural combination is Te union of the Cod-fishes with the Flat-fishes into the order Anacanthini. Flat-fishes are in fact nothing but asymmetrical Cod-fishes. Miiller separates them from the remaining Malacopterygians by the absence of a connecting duct between the air-bladder and oesophagus. However, it must be admitted that the examina- tion of those fishes, and especially of the young stages, is not complete enough to raise the question beyond every doubt, whether the presence or absence of that duct is an absolutely distinctive character between Anacanths and Malacoptery- glans. Many of the families established by Cuvier were re- examined and better defined by Miiller, as may be seen from the following outline of his system :— Sub-classis I—Dipnoi. Ordo I.—Sirenoidei. Fam. 1. Sirenoidei. Sub-classis IJ.—Teleostei. Ordo I.—Acanthopteri. Fam. 1. Percoidei. Fam. 9. Squamipennes. » 2. Cataphracti. » 10. Taenioidei. 5 9 Sparoidei. » Ll. Gobioidei. » 4. Scienoidei., » 12. Blennioidei. , 0. Labyrinthiformes. », 13. Pediculati. » 6. Mugiloidei. » 14. Theutyes. » 1. Notacanthini. » 15. Fistulares. » 8. Scomberoidei. 24 FISHES. Ordo II.—Anacanthini. Sub-ordo I.—Anacanthini sub-brachii. Fam. 1. Gadoidei. » 2. Pleuronectides. Sub-ordo IJ.—Anacanthini apodes. Fam. 1. Ophidini. Ordo III.—Pharyngognathi. Sub-ordo I.—Pharyngognathi acanthopterygii. Fam. 1. Labroidei cycloidei. » 2. Labroidei ctenoidei. 5, 93 Chromides. Sub-ordo Il.—Pharyngognathi malacopterygii. Fam. 1. Scomberesoces. Ordo IV.—Physostomi. Sub-ordo I—Physostomi abdominales. Fam. 1. Siluroidei. Fam. 7. Galaxie. » 2. Cyprinoidei. », 8. Salmones. » 9 Characini. », 9. Scopelini. », 4. Cyprinodontes. » 10. Clupeide. »5 9. Mormyri. » 11. Heteropygii. 6. Esoces. Sub-ordo Il.—Physostomi apodes s. anguillares. Fam. 12. Murenoidei. » 13. Gymnotini. » 14. Symbranchii. Ordo V.—Plectognathi. Fam. 1. Balistini. » 2. Ostraciones. » 9% Gymnodontes. Ordo VI.—Lophobranchii. fam. 1, Lophobranchi. HISTORY. 20 Sub-classis IJJ.—Ganoidei. Ordo I.—Holostei. Fam. 1. Lepidosteini. », 2. Polypterini. Ordo II.—Chondrostei. Fam. 1. Acipenserini, » 2. Spatularie. Sub-classis IV.—Elasmobranchi s. Selachii. Ordo I.—Plagiostomi. Sub-ordo I.—Squalidee. Fam. 1. Scyllia. Fam. 6. Rhinodontes. » 2. Nyctitantes. » «. Notidani. », 3 Lamnoidei. » 8. Spinaces. » 4. Alopeciee. » 9. Seymnoidei. » 0. Cestraciones. », 10. Squatine. Sub-ordo IIT.—Rajidee. Fam. 11. Squatinoraje. Fam. 14. Trygones. » 12. Torpedines. » 15. Mylobatides. » 13. Raje. », 16. Cephalopterze. Ordo II.—Holocephali. Fam. 1. Chimaerz. Sub-classis V.—Marsipobranchii s. Cyclostomi. Ordo I.—Hyperoartii. Fam. 1, Petromyzonini. Ordo II.—Hyperotreti. Fam. 1. Myxinoidei. Sub-classis VI.—Leptocardil. Ordo I.—Amphioxini. Fam. 1. Amphioxini. The discovery (in the year 1871) of a living representative Discovery : : E f of a genus hitherto believed to be long extinct, Ceratodus, Cantons Recent Works. 26 FISHES. threw a new light on the affinities of Fishes. The author who had the good fortune of examining this fish, was enabled to show that, on the one hand, it was a form most closely allied to Lepidosiren ; on the other, that it could not be separated from the Ganoid fishes, and therefore that also Lepidosiren was a Ganoid: a relation pointed at already by Huxley in a previous paper on “Devonian Fishes.” This discovery led to further considerations! of the relative characters of Miiller’s sub-classes, and to the system which is followed in the pre- sent work. Having followed the development of the ichthyological system down to the latest time, we have to retrace our steps to enumerate the most important contributions to Ichthyology which appeared contemporaneously with or subsequently to the publication of Cuvier and Valenciennes’s great work. As in other branches of Zoology, activity increased almost with every year; and for convenience’s sake we may arrange these works in three rubrics. I.— VOYAGES, CONTAINING GENERAL ACCOUNTS OF ZOOLOGICAL COLLECTIONS. A. French. 1. “Voyage autour du monde sur les Corvettes de 8. M. PUranie et la Physicienne, sous le commandement de M. Freycinet. Zoologie: Poissons par Quoy et Gaimard.” (Paris, 1824, 4to, atlas fol.) 2. “Voyage dela Coquille. Zoologie par Lesson.” (Paris, 1826-30, 4to, atlas fol.) 3. “Voyage de l’Astrolabe, sous le commandement de M. J. Dumont d’Urville. Poissons par Quoy et Gavmard.” (Paris, 1834, 8vo, atlas fol.) 1 Description of Ceratodus. ‘‘ Phil. Trans.,”’ 1871, ii. RECENT LITERATURE. D/ 4, “Voyage au Pole Sud par M. J. Dumont d’Urville. Poissons par Hombron et Jacquinot.” (Paris, 1853-4, 8vo, atlas fol.) B. English. 1. “Voyage of H.M.S. Sulphur. Fishes by J. Richardson.” (Lond. 1844-5, 4to.) 2. “ Voyage of H.M.S.S. Erebus and Terror. Fishes by J. Richardson.” (Lond. 1846. 4to.) 3. “Voyage of H.MS. Beagle. Fishes by Z. Jenyns.” (Lond. 1842, 4to.) 4, “Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger. Fishes by 4. Gunther” (in course of publication). C. German. 1. “Reise der Osterreichischen Fregatte Novara. Fische von &. Kner.” (Wien. 1865, 4to.) IL—FAUNAE. A. Great Britain. 1. R. Parnell, “The Natural History of the Fishes of the Firth of Forth.” (Edinb. 1838, 8vo.) 2. W. Yarrell, “A History of British Fishes.” (8d edit. Lond. 1859, 8vo.) 3. J. Couch, “A History of the Fishes of the British Islands.” (Lond. 1862-5, 8vo.) B. Denmark and Scandinavia. 1. H. Kroyer, “Danmark’s Fiske.’ (Kjobnh. 1838-53, 8vo.) 2. S. Nilsson, “Skandinavisk Fauna.” (Vol. IV. Fiskarna. Lund. 1855, 8vo.) 3. Fries och Ekstrom, “Skandinavians Fiskar.” (Stockh. 1836, 4to, with excellent plates.) 28 FISHES. C. Russia. 1. Nordmann, “ Ichthyologie Pontique,” in “ Voyage dans la Russie meéridionale de Demidoff” (Tom. ii. Paris, 1840, 8vo, atlas fol.) D. Germany. 1. Heckel and Kner, “ Die Siisswasser-fische der Oester- reichischen Monarchie.” (Leipz. 1858, 8vo.) 2. 0. T. E. Siebold, “ Die Siisswasser-fische von Mittel- europa.” (Leipz. 1863, 8vo.) E. Jtaly and Mediterranean. 1. Bonaparte, “ Iconografia della Fauna Italica.” Tom. ill. Pesci. (Roma, 1832-41, fol.) (Incomplete.) 2. Costa, “Fauna del Regno di Napoli.” Pesci. (Napoli, Ato, about 1850.) (Incomplete.) F. France. 1. H. Blanchard, “Les Poissons des eaux douces de la France.” (Paris, 1866, 8vo.) G. Pyrenean Peninsula. The freshwater Fish-fauna of Spain and Portugal was almost unknown, until F. Steindachner paid some visits to those countries for the purpose of exploring the principal rivers. His discoveries are described in several papers in the “Sitzungsberichte der Akademie zu Wien.” £. du Bocage and F. Capello contributed towards the knowledge of the marine fishes on the coast of Portugal. (“ Jorn. Scienc. Acad. Lisb.”) H. North America. 1. J. Richardson, “Fauna Boreali Americana.” Part III. Fishes. (Lond. 1836, 4to.) The species described in this work are nearly all from the British possessions in the North. RECENT LITERATURE. 29 2. Dekay, “ Zoology of New York.” Part IV. Fishes. (New York, 1842, 4to.) 3. “Reports of the United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries.” (5 vols. Washingt. 1873-79, 8vo. In progress. Contains most valuable information.) Besides these works, numerous descriptions of North American freshwater fishes have been published in the Reports of the various U.S. Government expeditions, and in North American scientific journals, by Storer, Baird, Girard, W. O. Ayres, Cope, Jordan, Brown Coode, etc.; but a good general, and especially critical, account of the fishes of the United States is still a desideratum. I.—Japan. 1. “Fauna Japonica.” Poissons par H. Schlegel. (Lugd. Bat. 1850, fol.) J.—LKast Indies; Tropical parts of the Indian and Pacific Oceans, 1. #. Riippell, “ Atlas zu der Reise im Nordlichen Afrika.” (Frankf. 1828, fol.) 2. EH. Riippell, “Neue Wirbelthiere. Fische.” (Frankf. 1837, fol.) These two works form the standard works for the student of the Fishes of the Red Sea, and are distinguished by a rare conscientiousness and faithfulness of the descriptions and figures; so that there is no other part of the tropical seas, with the fishes of which we are so intimately acquainted, as with those of the Red Sea. But these works have a still wider range of usefulness, in as much as only a small propor- tion of the fishes is limited to that area, the majority being distributed over the Indian Ocean into Polynesia. Ruppell’s works were supplemented by the two first of the following works :— 3. BR. L. Playfair and A. Ginther, “The Fishes of Zanzi- bar.” (Lond. 1866, 4to) ; and 30 FISHES. 4. C. B. Klunzinger, “Synopsis der Fische des Rothen Meers.” (Wien. 1870-1, 8vo.) 5. T. Cantor, “Catalogue of Malayan Fishes.” (Calcutta, 1850, 8vo.) 6. F. Day, “The Fishes of India” (Lond. 1875, 4to, in progress) ; contains an account of the freshwater and marine species, and is not yet complete. 7. A. Gunther, “Die Fische der Siidsee.” (Hamburg, 4to ; from 1873, in progress.) Unsurpassed in activity, as regards the exploration of the fish fauna of the East Indian Archipelago, is P. Bleeker, a surgeon in the service of the Dutch East Indian Government (born 1819, died 1878), who, from the year 1840, for nearly thirty years, amassed immense collections of the fishes of the various islands, and described them in extremely numerous papers, published chiefly in the Journals of the Batavian Society. When his descriptions and the arrangement of his materials evoked some criticism, it must be remembered that, at the time when he commenced his labours, and for many years afterwards, he stood alone, without the aid of a previously named collection on which to base his first re- searches, and without other works but that of Cuvier and Valenciennes. He had to create for himself a method of dis- tinguishing species and of describing them; and afterwards it would have been difficult for him to abandon his original method and the principles by which he had been guided for so many years. His desire of giving a new name to every individual, to every small assemblage of species wherever practicable, or of changing an old name, detracts not a little from the satisfaction with which his works would be used otherwise. It is also surprising that a man with his ana- tomical knowledge and unusual facilities should have been satisfied with the merely external examination of the speci- mens. But none of his numerous articles contain anything RECENT LITERATURE. Sik relating to the anatomy, physiology, or habits of the fishes which came under his notice; hence his attempts at syste- matic arrangement are very far from indicating an advance in Ichthyology. Soon after his return to Europe (1860) Bleeker commenced to collect the final results of his labours in a grand work, illustrated by coloured plates, “Atlas Ichthyologique des Indes Orientales Néerlandaises.” (Amsterd. fol. 1862); the publication of which was interrupted by the author’s death in 1878. K.— Africa. 1. A. Gunther, “The Fishes of the Nile” in Petherick’s “Travels in Central Africa.” (Lond. 1869, 8vo.) 2. W. Peters, “ Naturwissenschaftliche Reise nach Mos- sambique. IV. Flussfische.” (Berl. 1868, 4to.) L.— West Indies and South America. 1. LZ. Agassiz, “Selecta genera et species Piscium, quee in itinere per Brasiliam, collegit J. B. de Spix.” (Monach. 1829, fol.) 2. F. de Castlenau, “ Animaux nouveaux ou rares, recueillis pendant l’expedition dans les parties centrales de Amérique du Sud. Poissons.” (Paris, 1855, 4to.) 3. A. Gunther, “ An account of the Fishes of the States of Central America.” (In Trans. Zool. Soc. 1868.) 4, L. Vaillant and F. Bocourt, “ Mission scientifique au Mexique et dans l’Amérique centrale. Poissons.” (Paris, 1874, 4to.) (In progress.) F, Pocy, the celebrated naturalist of Havannah, devoted many years of study to the Fishes of Cuba. His papers and memoirs are published partly in two periodicals, issued by himself, under the title of “Memorias sobre la Historia natural de la Isle de Cuba” (from 1851), and “ Repertorio By FISHES. Fisico-natural de la Isla de Cuba” (from 1865), partly in North American scientific journals. And, finally, &. Stein- dachner has published many contributions, accompanied by excellent figures, to our knowledge of the Fishes of Central and South America. M.—WNew Zealand. 1. F. W. Hutton and J. Hector, “ Fishes of New Zealand.” (Wellingt. 1872, 8vo.) N.—Aretie Regions. 1. C. Liitken, “A revised Catalogue of the Fishes of Greenland,” in “ Manual of the Natural History, Geology, and Physics of Greenland.” (Lond. 1875, 8vo.) Although only a nominal list, this catalogue is useful, as it contains references to all the principal works in which Arctic fishes have been described. The fishes of Spitzbergen were examined by A. J. Malmgren (1865), ITI.— ANATOMICAL WORKS. The number of authors who worked on the anatomy of fishes is almost as great as that of faunists; and we should go beyond the hmits of the present work if we mentioned more than the most prominent and successful. JZ. H. Rathke, J. Miller, J. Hyrtl, and H. Stannius left scarcely any organ un- examined, and their researches had a direct bearmg either on the relation of the class of fishes to the other vertebrates, or on the systematic arrangement of the fishes themselves. EH. E. von Baer, F. de Filippi, C. Vogt, W. His, W. K. Parker, and F. M. Balfour worked at their embryology ; A. Kolliker and G. Pouchet at their histology. The osteology was specially treated by G. Bakker, F. C. Rosenthal, L. Agassiz, and C. Gegenbaur ; the nervous system by Grottsche, Philipeaua, Stannius, L. de Sanctis, L. Stieda, Baudelot and Miclucho- Maclay ; the organ of hearing by £. H. Weber, C. Hasse, and G. Retzius. The electric fishes were examined by L. Geoffroy, RECENT LITERATURE. 30 ‘O. Matteuci, P. Pacini, T. Bilharz, and Max Schultze. The development and metamorphosis of the Lamperns was made the subject of research by H. Miller, M. Schultze, and P. Owsjannikow; Miiller’s examination of Branchiostoma was continued by J. Marcusen, A. Kovalevsky, L. Stieda, W. Miiller, C. Hasse, T. Hualey, and F. M. Balfour. The most comprehensive accounts of the anatomy of fishes are con- tained in the following works :— 1. H. Stannius, “Zootomic der Fische,’ 2d edit. (Berl. 1854, 8vo.) 2. f. Owen, “Anatomy of Vertebrates,’ vol. i. (Lond. 1866, 8vo.) 3. A. Owen, “ Lectures on the Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Vertebrate Animals.” Part I. Fishes. (Lond. 1846, 8vo.) 4. T. Huxley, “ A Manual of the Anatomy of Vertebrated Animals.” (Lond. 1871, 16mo.) It has been mentioned above that the great work of Cuvier Latest and Valenciennes had been left incomplete. Several authors, sae i therefore, supplied detailed accounts of the orders omitted in that work. Miller and Henle published an account of the Plagiostomes, and Kauwp of the Murzenidee and Lophobranchii. A. Duméril, finally, commenced an “ Histoire naturelle des Poissons ou Ichthyologie générale,” of which, however, two volumes only appeared, containing a complete account of the “ Plagiostomes ” (Paris, 1865, 8vo), and of the “Ganoids and Lophobranchs.” (Paris, 1870, 8vo.) So great an activity had prevailed in Ichthyology since the publication of the “Histoire naturelle” by Cuvier and Valenciennes, andthe results of the manifold enquiries were scattered over such a multitude of publications, that it became imperative to collect again all these materials in one com- prehensive work. This was done in the “ Catalogue of Fishes,” D 34 FISHES. published by the Trustees of the British Museum, in eight volumes (Lond. 1859-70). Beside the species previously de- scribed many new forms were added, the number total of species referred to in those volumes amounting to 8525. As regards the systematic arrangement—Miller’s system was adopted in the main, but the definition of the families is much modified. This, however, need not be further entered into here, and will become sufficiently apparent in the subsequent parts of the present work. iN) Fig. 1.—Lower aspect of head of Raia lemprieri. CHAPTER. IT. TOPOGRAPHICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE EXTERNAL PARTS OF FISHES. In the body of a fish four parts are distinguished: the head, trunk, tail, and the fins; the boundary between the first and second being generally indicated by the gill-opening, and that between the second and third by the vent. The form Form of of the body and the relative proportions of those principal Bas parts are subject to much variation, such as is not found in any other class of Vertebrates. In fishes which are endowed with the power of steady and more or less rapid locomotion, a deviation from that form of body, which we observe in a perch, carp, or mackerel, is never excessive. The body forms a simple, equally-formed wedge, compressed or slightly rounded, well fitted for cleaving the water. In fishes which are in the habit of moving on the bottom, the whole body, or at least the head, is vertically depressed and flattened; the head may be so enormously enlarged that the trunk and tail appear merely as an appendage. In one family of fishes, the Plewronectide or Flat-fishes, the body is compressed into a thin disk; they swim and move on one side only, which remains constantly directed towards the bottom, a peculiarity by which the symmetry of all parts of the body has been affected. e AN US P planted in a pterygo-palatine Fig, 35.—Palatal view of Skull of ossification (J), which some- pares times is paired, sometimes continuous. The base of the skull is constantly covered by a large basal ossification (0). The hyoid is well developed, sometimes reduced to a pair of ceratohyals, sometimes with a basihyal and glossyhyal. The skeleton of the branchial apparatus approaches the Tele- osteous type, less so in Lepidosiren than in Ceratodus, in which five branchial arches are developed, but with the lateral and mesial pieces reduced in number. A large operculum, and a smaller sub- or inter-opereulum are present. The scapular arch consists of a single median transverse cartilage, and a pair of lateral cartilages which bear the articular condyle for the pectoral limb. The latter cartilages form the base of a large membrane-bone, and the whole arch is suspended from the skull by means of an osseous supraclavicle. The fore-limb of the Dipnoi (Fig. 36) differs externally greatly from the pectoral fin of other Ganoid fishes. It is covered with small scales along the middle, from the root 74 FISHES. to its extremity, and surrounded by a rayed fringe similar to f Hf} if) “Aa f iI] Fig. 36.—Fore-limb of Ceratodus. the vertical fin. A muscle split into numerous fascicles extendsall the length of the fin, which is flexible in every part and in every direction. The cartilagin- ous framework supporting it is jomed to the scapular arch by an oblong cartilage, followed by a broad basal cartilage (a), generally single, sometimes showing traces of a triple division. Along the middle of the fin runs a jointed axis (0), the joints gradually becoming smaller and thinner towards the extremity ; each joint bears on each side a three, two, or one-jointed branch (c,d). This axial arrangement of the pectoral skele- ton, which evidently represents one of its first and lowest conditions, has been termed Archipterygium by Gegenbaur. It is found in Ceratodus and other genera, but in Lepidosiren the jointed axis only has been preserved, with the addition of rudimentary rays in Pro- topterus. The pubic consists of a_ single flattened subquadrangular cartilage, produced into a long single anterior process. Posteriorly it terminates on each side in a condyle, to which the basal cartilage of the ventral paddle is joined. The endoskeleton of the paddle is almost identical with that of the pectoral. The Ganoid fishes with persistent notochord, but with a hyostylic skull (that is, a skull with a separate suspensorium) consist of the sub-order Chondrostet, of which the existing representatives are the Sturgeons (Acipenser, Scaphirhynchus, SKELETON OF STURGEONS. 75 Polyodon), and the extinct the Chondrosteidw, Palwoniscide, and (according to Traquair) Platysomide. Their spinal column does not differ essentially from that of the Dipnoi. Segmentation is represented only as far as the neural and hzemal elements are concerned. All are eminently heterocercal. Ribs are present in most, but replaced by liga- ments in Polyodon. The primordial cranium of the Sturgeons consists of per- sistent cartilage without ossifications in its substance, but superficial bones are still more developed and specialised than in the Dipnoi; so it is, at least, in the true Sturgeons, but less so in Polyodon (Fig. 37). The upper and lateral parts of the skull are covered by well-developed membrane bones, which, Fig. 37.—Skull of Polyodon (after Traquair). n, Nasal cavity; sq, squamosal; mh, hyomandibular; sy, symplectic; pa, palato-pterygoid ; m, Meckelian cartilage; ma, maxillary; d, dentary; h, hyoid; op, opercle; b7, branchiostegal ; s.cl, supra-clavicular; p.cl, post- clavicular ; cl, clavicle; 7.cl, infra-clavicular. from this sub-order, upwards in the series, will be found to exist throughout the remaining forms of fishes. They are bones, the origin of which is not in cartilage but Im membranous connective tissue. The lower surface of the skull is covered by an extremely large basal bone, which extends from the vomerine region on to the anterior part of the spinal column. The nasal excavation in the skull is rather lateral than inferior. The ethmoidal region is generally much produced, forming 76 FISHES. the base of the long projecting snout. The suspensorium is movably attached to the side of the skull, and consists of two pieces, a hyomandibular and a symplectic, which now appears for the first time as a separate piece, and to which the hyoid is attached. The palato-maxillary apparatus is more complex than in the Sharks and Dipnoi; a_palato- pterygoid consists of two mesially-connected rami in Polyodon, and of a complex cartilaginous disk in Acipenser, being arti- culated in both to the Meckelian cartilage. In addition, the Sturgeons possess one or two pairs of osseous rods, which, in Polyodon at least, represent the maxillary, and therefore must be the representatives of the labial cartilages of the Sharks. The Meckelian cartilage is more or less covered by tegu- mentary bones. In the gill-cover, besides the operculum, a sub- and inter- operculum may be distinguished in Acipenser. The hyoid consists of three pieces, of which the posterior bears a broad branchiostegal in Polyodon. In the scapulary arch the primordial cartilaginous elements scarcely differ from those of the Dipnoit. The mem- brane-bones are much expanded, and offer a continuous series suspended from the skull. Their division in the median ventral line is complete. The pectoral is supported by a car- tilaginous framework (Fig. 38) similar to that of Ceratodus, but much more Fig. 38.—Fore-limb of Acipenser. shortened and reduced in its periphery, the branches being absent altogether on one side of the axis. This modification of the fin is analogous to the heterocercal condition of the end of the spinous column. To the inner SKELETON OF POLYPTERUS. WT corner of a basal cartilage (a) a short axis (6) is joined, which on its outer side bears a few branches (d) only, the remaining branches (c) being fixed to the basal cartilage. The dermal fin-rays are opposed to the extremities of the branches, as in the Dzpnoz. The pubic consists of a paired cartilage, to which tarsal pieces supporting the fin-rays are attached. The other living Ganoid fishes have the spinous column entirely or nearly entirely ossified, and have been comprised under the common name Holoste:. However, they form three very distinct types; several attempts have been made to coordinate with them the fossil forms, but this task is beset with extreme difficulties, and its solution hitherto has not proved to be satisfactory. The Polypteroidei have their spinous column formed by dis- tinct osseous amphicelous vertebye, that is, vertebree with concave anterior and posterior surfaces. It is nearly diphy- cercal; a slight degree of heterocercy obtains, inasmuch as the last vertebra is sueceeded by a very thin cartilaginous filament which penetrates between the halves of one of the middle rays of the terminal fin. The rays above this cartila- ginous filament are articulated to interneurals, those below | lack interheemals, and are attached either to the hemals or vertebral centres. The neural arches, though ossified, do not coalesce with the centrum, and form one canal only, for the myelon. There are no intermediate elements between the neural spines. Interneurals developed, but simple, articulat- ing with the dermoneurals. The abdominal vertebre have parapophyses developed with epipleural spines. Only the caudal vertebrae have heemal spines, which, like the inter- hemals, agree in every essential respect with the opposite neurals. ibs are inserted, not on the parapophyses, but on the centre, immediately below the parapophyses. The skull of Polypterus (Fig. 39) shows a great advance 78 FISHES. towards the Teleosteous type, the number of separable bones “Fig. 39.—Skull of Polypterus. (After Traquair. ) Fig. I. Upper aspect of the Primordial Cranium, with the membrane-bones removed. Fig. II. Lower aspect of the same. Fig. III. Side view, with the membrane-bones. Fig. IV. Lower aspect of the Skull, part of the bones being removed on one side, The parts shaded with oblique lines are cartilage of the primordial skull. An, Angular; ao, anteorbital; Az, articulary ; B, basal; D, dentary; £, ee ee ee ee a SKELETON OF POLYPTERUS. 79 ethmoid ; F, frontal ; Ma, mastoid; Mp, metapterygoid; Mz, maxillary ; N, nasal; O, operculum ; 0c, occipital ; Pa, parietal; P/, palatine; Pma, premaxillary ; po, postorbital; Prf, prefrontal ; Pt, post-temporals ; Pé/, postfrontal ; Ptr, pterygoid; Q, quadrate ; S, suspensorium ; So, suboper- + culum; Sp, sphenoid; Spl, splenial; S¢, supratemporals; 7’, tympanic lamina; 7’, turbinal; v, vomer; x x, small ossicles ; x x’, spiraculars. being greatly increased. They are arranged much in the same fashion as in Teleostei. But a great portion of the primordial cranium remains cartilaginous. The membrane-bones which cover the upperand lowersurfaces of the brain-case are so much developed as to cause the underlying cartilage to disappear, so that a large vacuity or fontanelle exists in the substance of the upper as well as lower cartilaginous wall. Of ossifica- tions belonging to the primordial skull must be noticed the single occipital with a mastoid on each side. They are sepa- rated by persistent cartilage from the sphenoids and _post- frontals ; the former, which are the largest ossification of the primordial cranium, enclose the anterior half of the brain cavity. Finally, the nasal portion contains a median ethmoid and a pair of preefrontal bones. Only a very small portion of the bones described are visible externally, nearly the whole of the primordial cranium being covered by the membrane-bones. Of these are seen on the upper surface a pair of parietals, frontals, “nasals,” and turbinals ; on the lower surface a large cross-shaped basal, anteriorly bordered on each side by a pterygoid, parallel to a palatine which forms a suture with the double vomer. The suspensorium has in front a metapterygoid and quadrate bone, and an operculum and suboperculum are attached to it behind. Premaxillaries and maxillaries are now fully developed, but immovably attached to the skull. The lower jaw is ossi- fied, and consists of an articulary, angular, dentary, and splenial. Of labial cartilages a rudiment at the angle of the mouth has remained persistent. 80 FISHES. The side of the skull, in front of the operculum, is covered by a large irregularly-shaped bone (7') (corresponding to the “tympanic lamina” of Ceratodus, Fig. 35, ¢), held by some to be the praoperculum; along its upper circumference les a series of small ossicles, of which two may be distinguished as spiraculars, as they form a valve for the protection of the spiracular orifice of these fishes. An infraorbital ring is repre- sented by a pree- and post-orbital only. Each hyoid consists of three pieces, none of which bear branchiostegals, the single median piece being osseous in front and cartilaginous behind. Four branchial arches are developed, the foremost consisting of three, the second and third of two, and the last of a single piece. There is no lower pharyngeal. Between the rami of the lower jaw the throat is protected by a pair of large osseous laminee (yular plates), which have been considered to represent the urohyal of osseous fishes. The scapulary arch is almost entirely formed by the well- developed membrane-bones, which in the ventral line are suturally united. The pectoral fin is supported by three bones, pro-, meso-, and metapterygium, of which the dilated middle one alone bears rays, and is excluded from the articu- lation with the shoulder-girdle. The pubic consists of paired bone, to which tarsal bones supporting the fin-rays are attached. In the Lepidosteoidet the vertebrae are completely ossified, and opisthocelous, having a convexity in front and a concavity behind, as in some Amphibians. Though the end of the body externally appears nearly diphycercal, the termination of the vertebral column is, in fact, distinctly heterocercal (Fig. 40). Its extremity remains cartilaginous, is turned upwards, and lies immediately below the scutes which cover the upper margin of the caudal fin. It is preceded by a few rudimentary verte- bree which gradually pass into the fully developed normal vertebre. The caudal fin is suspended from hzemapophyses re SKELETON OF LEPIDOSTEUS. 81 only, and does not extend to the neural side of the vertebral Fig. 40.—Heterocercal Tail of Lepidosteus. nm, Vertebral column ; , hemal spines ; dn, fulera ; dh, lower fulcra. column. The neural arches coalesce with the centrum ; inter- neurals simple. The abdominal vertebree have parapophyses, to which the ribs are attached. Only the caudal vertebre have heemal spines. In the skull of ZLepidosteus the cartilage of the endo- cranium is still more replaced by ossifications than in Polyp- terus ; those ossifications, moreover, being represented by a greater number of discrete bones; especially the membrane- bones are greatly multiplied: the occipital, for instance, con- sists of three pieces; the vomer is double as in Polypterus ; the maxillary consists of a series of pieces firmly united by suture. The symplectic reaches the lower jaw, so that the arti- culary is provided with a double joint, viz. for the symplectic and quadrate ; the component parts of the lower jaw are as numerous as in reptiles, a dentary, splenial, articulary, angular, supra-angular, and coronary being distinct. The sides of the head are covered with numerous bones, and a preoperculum is developed in front of the gill-cover which, again, consists of an operculum and suboperculum. Each hyoid consists of three pieces, of which the middle is the longest, the upper bearing the largest of the three G 82 . FISHES. branchiostegals which Lepidosteus possesses ; a long and large elossohyal is intercalated between the lower ends of the hyoids. There are five branchial arches, the hindmost of which is modified into a lower pharyngeal; upper pharyn- geals are likewise present as in the majority of Teleosteous fishes. No gular plate. Of the scapulary arch the two halves are separated by a suture in the median line; the membrane-bones are well developed, only a remnant of the primordial cartilage remain- ing; the supraclavicle is very similar to that of Teleosteous fishes, less so the post-temporal. The base to which the limb is attached is a single osseous plate, supporting on its posterior margin semi-ossified rods in small number, which bear the pectoral rays. The pubic consists of paired bone, the anterior ends of which overlap each other, the extremity of the right pubis being dorsad to that of the left. The elements representing a tarsus are quite rudimentary and reduced in number (two or three). The vertebral column of the Amioider shows unmistak- able characters of the Paleeichthyie type. The arrangement of its component parts is extremely simple. The centra of the amphiccelous vertebre are well ossified, but the neural and hemal arches do not coalesce with the centra, from which they are separated by a thin layer of cartilage. Singularly, not every vertebra has apophyses: in the caudal portion of Amia the vertebrae are alternately provided with them and lack them. The heterocereal condition of the spinous column is well marked: as in the other Holostei the hindmost vertebrae are turned upwards, become smaller and smaller in size, and lose their neural arches, the hemals remaining developed to the end. Finally, the column terminates in a thin cartilaginous band, which is received between the lateral halves of the fifth or sixth upper caudal ray. Interneurals SKELETON OF TELEOSTEI. 83 and interhemals simple. Only the abdominal vertebra have parapophyses, with which the ribs are articulated. The configuration of the skull, and the development and arrangement of its component parts, approaches so much the Teleosteous type that, perhaps, there are greater differences in skulls of truly Teleosteous fishes than between the skulls of Amia and many Physostomi. Externally the cranium is entirely ossified ; and the remains of the cartilaginous primor- dial cranium (which, however, has no vacuity in its roof) can only be seen in a section, and are of much less extent than in many Physostomous fishes. The immovable intermaxillary, the double vomer, the plurality of ossifications representing the articulary, the double articulary cavity of the mandible for junction with the quadrate and symplectic bones, remind us still of similar conditions in the skull of Lepidosteus, but the mobility and formation of the maxillary, the arrange- ment of the gill-covers, the development of the opercles, the suspensorium, the palate, the insertion of a number of branchiostegals on the long middle hyoid piece, the composi- tion of the branchial framework (with upper and lower pharyngeals), are as in the Teleosteous type. A gular plate replaces the urohyal. The scapular arch is composed entirely of the membrane- bones found in the Teleostei, and the two sides are loosely united by ligament. The base to which the limb is attached is cartilaginous ; short semi-ossified rods are arranged along its hinder margin and bear the pectoral rays. The skeleton of the hind-limb agrees entirely with that of Lepidosteus. [T. W. Bridge, The Cranial Osteology of Amia calva ; in Journ. Anat. and Physiol. vol. xi.] In the Teleosteous fishes the spinous column consists of completely ossified amphiccelous vertebre ; its termination is homocercal—that is, the caudal fin appears to be more or 84 FISHES. less symmetrical, the last vertebra occupying a central posi- tion in the base of the fin, and being coalesced with a flat osseous lamella, the hypural (Fig. 23,70), on the hind margin of which the fin-rays are fixed. The hypural is but a union of modified hemapophyses which are directed backwards, and the actual termination of the notochord is bent upwards, and lies along the upper edge of the hypural, hidden below the last rudimentary neural elements. In some Teleosteans, as the Salmonida, the last vertebree are conspicuously bent upwards : in fact, strictly speaking, this homocercal condition is but one of the various degrees of heterocercy, different from that of many Ganoids in this respect only, that the caudal fin itself has assumed a higher degree of symmetry. The neural and hemal arches generally coalesce with the centrum, but there are many exceptions, inasmuch as some portion of the arches of a species, or all of them, show the original division. The vertebree are generally united with one another by zygapophyses, and frequently similar additional articulations exist at the lower parts of the centra. Parapophyses and ribs are very general, but the latter are inserted on the centra and the base of the processes, and never on their extremities. The point of insertion of the rib, more especially on the anterior vertebra, may be still higher—viz. at the base of the neural arch, as in Cotylis and allied genera, and even on the top of the neurapophysis, as in Batrachus. There is a great amount of variation as regards the degree in which the primordial cranium persists ; it is always more or less replaced by bone; frequently it disappears entirely, but in some fishes, like the Salmonidea or Esocide, the earti- lage persists to the same or even to a greater extent than in the Ganoidei holostei. Added to the bones preformed in car- tilage are a great number of membrane-bones. The different kinds of these membrane-bones occur with greater or less SKELETON OF TELEOSTEI. 85 constancy throughout this sub-class ; they often coalesce with, and are no more separable from, the neighbouring or under- lying cartilage-bones. All these bones have been topogra- phically enumerated in Chapter IV. Many attempts have been made to classify the bones of the Teleosteous skull, according to their supposed relation to each other, or with the view to demonstrate the unity of plan on which the skull has been built; but in all either the one or the other of the following two principles has been followed :— A. The “vertebral doctrine” starts from the undeniable fact that the skull is originally composed of several segments, each of which is merely the modification of a vertebra. The component parts of such a cranial segment are considered to be homologous to those of a vertebra. Three, four, or five cranial vertebree have been distinguished, all the various bones of the fully-developed and ossified skull being referred, without distinction as to their origin, to one or the other of those vertebral segments. The idea of the typical unity of the osseous framework of Vertebrates has been worked out with the greatest originality and knowledge of detail, by Owen, who demonstrates that the fish-skull is composed of Jour vertebre. The bones of the fish-skull are, according to him, primarily divisible into those of the newroskeleton, splanchnoskeleton, and dermoskeleton. The bones of the newro- or proper endo-skeleton are arranged in a series of four horizontally succeeding segments : the occipital, parietal, frontal, and nasal vertebra; each seg- ment consisting of an upper (neural) and a lower (hzemal) arch, with a common centre, and with diverging appendages. The neural arches of the four vertebre, in their succession from the occiput towards the snout, are :— 1. Epencephalic arch, composed of the occipitals. 86 FISHES. 2. Mesencephalic arch, composed of basisphenoid, ali- sphenoid, parietal, and mastoid. 3. Prosencephalie arch, composed of presphenoid, orbito- sphenoid, frontal, and postfrontal. 4, Rhinencephalic arch, composed of vomer, prefrontal, and nasal. The hemal arches in the same order of succession are :-— 1. Scapular or scapulo-coracoid arch, composed of supra- scapula, scapula, and coracoid ; its appendage consists of the ulna, radius and carpal. 2. Hyoid or stylo-hyoid arch, composed of stylo-hyal, epi- hyal, ceratohyal, basihyal, glossohyal, and urohyal; its ap- pendage is the branchiostegals. 3. Mandibular or tympano-mandibular arch, composed of epi-, meso-, pre-, and hypo-tympanic, and the bones of the lower jaw ; its appendage consists of the preeoperculum and the other opercles. 4, Maxillary or palato-maxillary arch, composed of pala- tine, maxillary, and premaxillary ; its appendage consists of the pterygoid and entopterygoid. Parts of the splanchnoskeleton are held to be the ear-capsule or petrosal and the otolite, the eye-capsule or sclerotic, the nose-capsule or “ethmoid” and turbinal; the branchial arches. The bones of the dermoskeleton are the supratemporals, supraorbitals, suborbitals, and labials. B. In the second method of classifying the bones of the skull prominence is given to the facts of their different origin as ascertained by a study of their development. The parts developed from the primordial skull, or the cartilaginous case protecting the nervous centre are distinguished from those which enclose and support the commencement of the aliment- ary canal and the respiratory apparatus, and which, consisting of several arches, are comprised under the common name of SKELETON OF TELEOSTEI. 87 visceral skeleton of the skull. Further, a distinction is made between the bones preformed in cartilage and those originat- ing in tegumentary or membranous tissue. It is admitted that the primordial cranium is a coalition of several segments, the number of which is determined by that of the visceral arches, these representing the hemal arclies of the vertebral column ; but the membrane-bones are excluded from a consi- deration of the vertebral division of the primordial skull, as elements originally independent of it, although these additions have entered into special relations to the cartilage-bones. With these views the bones of the Teleosteous skull are classified thus :— 1. Cartilage-bones of the primordial skull_—The basi-occi- pital (5 in Figs. 23-26) has retained the form of a vertebral centrum; it is generally concave behind, the concavity contain- ing remains of the notochord ; rarely a rounded articulary head of the first vertebra fits into it, as in Symbranchus, and still more rarely it is provided with such an articulary head (F%stu- laria) ; frequently it shows two excavations on its inner surface for the reception of the saccus vestibuli. The exoccipitals (10) are situated on the side of the basi-occipital, and contribute the greater portion of the periphery of the foramen magnum ; frequently they articulate with the first vertebra, or meet in the upper median line, so as to exclude the supraoccipital from the foramen magnum. The supraoccipital (8) is interca- lated between the exoccipitals, and forms a most prominent part by the median crest, which sometimes extends far for- wards on the upper side of the skull, and offers attachment to the dorsal portion of the large lateral muscle of the trunk. When the interior portions of this bone remain cartilaginous, some part of the semicircular canals may be lodged in it. The region of the skull which succeeds the bones described encloses at least the greater portion of the labyrinth, and its component parts have been named with reference to it by 88 FISHES. some anatomists.. The alisphenoids (11) (Prooticum) form sutures posteriorly with the basi- and ex-occipitals, and meet each other in the median line at the bottom of the cerebral cavity ; they contribute to the formation of a hollow in which the hypophysis cerebri and the saccus vasculosus are received ; in conjunction with the exoccipital it forms another hollow for the reception of the vestibulum; generally it is perforated by the Trigeminal and Facial nerves. The paroccipitals (9) (Epioticum) lodge a portion of the posterior vertical semi- circular canal, and form a projection of the skull on each side of the occipital crest, to which a terminal branch of the scapu- lar arch is attached. The Mastoid (12 + 15) (Opzisthoticum) occupies the postero-external projection of the head; it en- closes a part of the external semicircular canal; is generally coalesced with a membrane-bone, the superficial sguwamosal, which emits a process for the suspension of the scapular arch, and is frequently, as in the Perch, divided into two separate bones. The anterior portion of the skull varies greatly as regards form, which is chiefly dependent on the extent of the cerebral cavity ; if the latter is advanced far forwards, the lateral walls of the primordial cranium are protected by more developed ossifications than if the cerebral cavity is shortened by the presence of a wide and deep orbit. In the latter case parts which normally form the side of the skull are situated in front of the brain-case, between it and the orbit, and gener- ally reduced in extent, often replaced by membranes ; especi- ally the interorbital septum may be reduced to membrane. The most constant ossifications of this part of the skull are the orbitosphenoids (14), which join the upper anterior margin of the alisphenoids. They vary much with regard to their development —they are small in Gadoids; larger in the Perch, Pike, Salmonoids, Macrodon, and the Clupeoids; and 1 As first proposed by Huxley. SKELETON OF TELEOSTEI. 89 very large in Cyprinoids and Siluroids, in which they contri- bute to the formation of the side of the brain-case. The single Y-shaped Sphenoideum anterius (15) is as frequently absent as present; it forms the anterior margin of the fossa for the hypophysis. Finally, the post-frontal (4) belongs also to this group of cartilage-bones. The centre of the foremost part of the skull is occupied by the ethmoid (3), which shows great variations as regards its extent and the degree of ossification; it may extend back- wards into the interorbital septum, and reach the orbito- sphenoids, or may be confined to the extremity of the skull; it may remain entirely cartilaginous, or ossify into a lamina which separates the two orbits and encloses an anterior prolongation of the brain-case, along which the olfactory nerves pass: modifications occurring again in higher verte- brates. A paired ossification attached to the fore-part of the ethmoid is the prefrontals (2), which form the base of the nasal fossa. 2. Membrane-bones attached to the primordial skull—To this group belong the parvetals (7) and frontals (1). The squa- mosal (12) has been mentioned above in connection with the mastoid. The swpraorbital is always small, and frequently absent. The lower surface of the skull is protected by the basisphenoid (parasphenoid) (6) and the vomer (16), both of which, especially the latter, may be armed with teeth." 3. Cartilage bones of the alimentary portion of the visceral skeleton of the skull_—The suspensorium consists of three car- tilage-bones, and affords a base for the opercular apparatus as well as a point of attachment to the hyoid, whilst in front it is connected with the palato-pterygo-palatine arch. They are the hyomandibular (23), symplectic (31), and quadrate 1 Stannius (pp. 60, 65) doubts the pure origin of these two bones from membranous tissue, and is inclined to consider them as ‘‘ the extreme end of the abortive axial system,” 90 FISHES. (26), connected by means of the metapterygoid (27) with the ecto- (24) and ento-pterygoid (25), the foremost bone of the arch being the palatine (22). All these bones have been sufficiently described above (p. 55), and it remains only to be mentioned that the bones of the palatine arch are but rarely absent, as for instance in Murenophis ; and that the sym- plectic does not extend to the articulary of the mandible, as in Amia and Lepidosteus, though its suspensory relation to the Meckelian cartilage is still indicated by a ligament which connects the two pieces. Of the mandibulary bones the articulary (35) is distinctly part of Meckel’s cartilage. Fre- quently another portion of cartilage below the articulary remains persistent, or is replaced by a separate membrane- bone, the angular. 4, Membrane-bones of the alimentary portion of the visceral skeleton of the skull—The suspensorium has one tegumentary bone attached to it, viz. the prwoperculum (30); it is but rarely absent, for instance in Murenophis. The premaail- lary (17) and maxillary (18) of the Teleostei appear to be also membrane-bones, although they are clearly analogous to the upper labial cartilages of the Sharks. The pre- maxillaries sometimes coalesce into a single piece (as in Diodon, Mormyrus), or they are firmly united with the maxillaries (as in all Gymnodonts, Serrasalmo, ete.) The relative position and connection of these two bones differs much, and is a valuable character in the discrimination of the various families. In some, the front margin of the jaw is formed by the premaxillary only, the two bones having a parallel position, as it has been described in the Perch (p. 53); in others, the premaxillary is shortened, allowing the maxillary to enter, and to complete, the margin of the upper jaw; and finally, in many no part of the maxillary is situated behind the premaxillary, but the entire bone is attached to the end of the premaxillary, forming its continuation. In SKELETON OF TELEOSTEI. 91 the last case the maxillary may be quite abortive. The mobility of the upper jaw is greatest in those fishes in which the premaxillary alone forms its margin. The form of the premaxillary is subject to great variation : the beak of Belone, Awphias is formed by the prolonged and coalesced premaxil- laries. The maxillary consists sometimes of one piece, some- times of two or three. The principal membrane-bone of the mandible is the dentary (54), to which is added the angular (86) and rarely a smaller one, the splenial or os operculare, which is situated at the inside of the articulary. 5. Cartilage-bones of the respiratory portion of the visceral skeleton of the skull_—W ith few exceptions all the ossifications of the hyoid and branchial arches, as described above (p. 58), belong to this group. 6. Membrane-bones of the respiratory portion of the visceral skeleton of the skull——They are the following: the opercular pieces, viz. operculum (28), suboperculum (32), and interoper- culum (33). The last of these is the least constant; it may be entirely absent, and represented by a ligament extending from the mandible to the hyoid. The wrohyal (42) which separates the musculi sternohyoidei, and serves for an in- creased surface of their insertion; and finally the branchio- stegals (43), which vary greatly in number, but are always fixed to the cerato- and epi-hyals. 7. Dermal bones of the skull—tTo this category are referred some bones which are ossifications of, and belong to, the cutis. They are the turbinals (20), the suborbitals (19), and the supratemporals. They vary much with regard to the degree in which they are developed, and are rarely entirely absent. Nearly always they are wholly or partly transformed into tubes or hollows, in which the muciferous canals with their numerous nerves are lodged. Those in the temporal and scapulary regions are not always developed; on the other hand, the series of those ossicles may be continued on 92 FISHES. to the trunk, accompanying the lateral line. In many fishes those of the infraorbital ring are much dilated, protecting the entire space between the orbit and the rim of the preeoper- culum; in others, especially those which have the angle of the przoperculum armed with a powerful spine, the infra- orbital ring emits a process towards the spine, which thus serves as a stay or support of this weapon (Scorpenida, Cottide). The pectoral arch of the Teleosteous fishes exhibits but a remnant of a primordial cartilage, which is replaced by two ossifications,t the coracoid (51) and scapula (52); they offer posteriorly attachment to two series of short rods, of which the proximal are nearly always ossified, whilst the distal frequently remain small cartilaginous nodules hidden in the base of the pectoral rays. The bones, by which this portion is connected with the skull, are membrane-bones, viz. the clavicle (49), with the postclavicle (49 +50), the supraclavicle (47), and post-temporal (46). The order of their arrangement in the Perch has been described above (p. 59). However, many Teleosteous fish lack pectoral fins, and in them the pectoral arch is frequently more or less reduced or rudi- mentary, as in many species of Murenide. In others the membrane-bones are exceedingly strong, contributing to the outer protective armour of the fish, and then the clavicles are generally suturally connected in the median line. The postclavicula and the supraclavicula may be absent. Only exceptionally the shoulder-girdle is not suspended from the skull, but from the anterior portion of the spinous column (Symbranchide, Murenide, Notacanthide). The number of basal elements of each of the two series never exceeds five, but may be less; and the distal series is absent in Siluroids. The pubic bones of the Teleosteous fishes undergo many modifications of form in the various families, but they are essentially of the same simple type as in the Perch. , Parker’s nomenclature is adopted here. CHAPTER V. MYOLOGY. In the lowest vertebrate, Branchiostoma, the whole of the muscular mass is arranged in a longitudinal band running along each side of the body; it is vertically divided into a number of flakes or segments (myocommas) by aponeu- rotic septa, which serve as the surfaces of insertion to the muscular fibres. But this muscular band has no connection with the notochord except in its foremost portion, where some relation has been formed to the visceral skeleton. A very thin muscular layer covers the abdomen. Also in the Cyclostomes the greatest portion of the mus- cular system is without direct relation to the skeleton, and, again, it is only on the skull and visceral skeleton where distinct muscles have been differentiated for special functions. To the development of the skeleton in the more highly organised fishes corresponds a similar development of the muscles; and the maxillary and branchial apparatus, the pectoral and ventral fins, the vertical fins, and especially the caudal, possess a separate system of muscles. But the most noteworthy is the muscle covering the sides of the trunk and tail (already noticed in Branchiostoma), which Cuvier described as the “great lateral muscle,” and which, in the higher fishes, is a compound of many smaller segments, cor- responding in number with the vertebre. Each lateral muscle is divided by a median longitudinal groove into a dorsal and ventral half; the depression in its middle is 94 FISHES. filled by an embryonal muscular substance which contains a large quantity of fat and blood-vessels, and therefore differs from ordinary muscle by its softer consistency, and by its colour which is reddish or grayish. Superficially the lateral muscle appears crossed by a number of white parallel tendinous zigzag stripes, forming generally three angles, of which the upper and lower point backwards, the middle one forwards. These are the outer edges of the aponeurotic septa between the myocommas. Each septum is attached to the middle and the apophyses of a vertebra, and, in the abdominal region, to its rib; frequently the septa receive additional support by the existence of epipleural spines. The fibres of each myocomma run straight and nearly horizontally from one septum to the next; they are grouped so as to form semiconical masses, of which the upper and lower have their apices turned backwards, whilst the middle cone, formed by the contiguous parts of the preceding, has its apex directed forward; this fits into the interspace between the antecedent upper and lower cones, the apices of which reciprocally enter the depressions in the succeeding segment, whereby all the seoments are firmly locked together (Owen). In connection with the muscles reference has to be made to the Electric organs with which certain fishes are provided, as it is more than probable, not only from the examination of peculiar muscular organs occurring in the Rays, Mormyrus, and Gymnarchus (the function of which is still conjectural), but especially from the researches into the development of the electric organ of Torpedo, that the electric organs have been developed out of muscular substance. The fishes possessing fully developed electric organs, with the power of accumulating electric force and communicating it in the form of shocks to other animals, are the electric Rays (Torpedinide), the electric Sheath-fish of tropical Africa (Malapterurus), and the electric Eel of tropical America ELECTRIC ORGANS. 95 (Gymnotus). The structure and. arrangement of the electric organ is very different in these fishes, and will be subsequently described in the special account of the several species. The phenomena attending the exercise of this extraordi- nary faculty also closely resemble muscular action. The time and strength of the discharge are entirely under the control of the fish. The power is exhausted after some time, and it needs repose and nourishment to restore it. If the electric nerves are cut and divided from the brain the cerebral action is interrupted, and no irritant to the body has any effect to excite electric discharge; but if their ends be irritated the discharge takes place, just as a muscle is excited to contraction under similar circumstances. And, singularly enough, the application of strychnine causes simultaneously a tetanic state of the muscles and a rapid succession of involuntary electric discharges. The strength of the discharges depends entirely on the size, health, and energy of the fish : an observation entirely agreeing with that made on the efficacy of snake-poison. Like this latter, the property of the electric force serves two ends in the economy of the animals which are endowed with it; it is essential and necessary to them for overpowering, stun- ning, or killing the creatures on which they feed, whilst incidentally they use it as the means of defending themselves from their enemies. CHAPTER VI. NEUROLOGY. THE most simple condition of the nervous central organ known in Vertebrates is found in Branchiostoma. In this fish the spinal chord tapers at both ends, an anterior cerebral swelling, or anything approaching a brain, being absent. It is band-hke along its middle third, and groups of darker cells mark the origins of the fifty or sixty pairs of nerves which accompany the intermuscular septa, and divide into a dorsal and ventral branch, as in other fishes. The two anterior pairs pass to the membranous parts above the mouth, and supply with nerve filaments a ciliated depression near the extremity of the fish, which is considered to be an olfactory organ, and two pigment spots, the rudiments of eyes. An auditory organ is absent. The spinal chord of the Cyclostomes is flattened in its whole extent, band-like, and elastic; also in Chimera it is elastic, but flattened in its posterior portion only. In all other fishes it is cylindrical, non-ductile, and generally ex- tending along the whole length of the spinal canal. The Plectognaths offer a singular exception in this respect that the spinal chord is much shortened, the posterior portion of the canal being occupied by a long cauda equina ; this shorten- ing of the spinal chord has become extreme in the Sun-fish (Orthagoriscus), 12 which it has shrunk into a short and conical appendage of the brain. Also in the Devil-fish (Lophius) a long cauda equina partly conceals the chord which terminates on the level of about the twelfth vertebra. BRAIN. 97 The brain of fishes is relatively small; in the Burbot (Lota) it has been estimated to be 7g pth part of the weight of the entire fish, in the Pike the ;s3'p5th part, and in the large Sharks it is relatively still smaller. It never fills the entire cavity of the cranium; between the dura mater which adheres to the inner surface of the cranial cavity, and the arachnoidea which envelops the brain, a more or less con- siderable space remains, which is filled with a soft gelatinous mass generally containing a large quantity of fat. It has been observed that this space is much less in young specimens than in adult, which proves that the brain of fishes does not erow in the same proportion as the rest of the body; and, indeed, its size is nearly the same in individuals of which one is double the bulk of the other. The brain of Osseous fishes (Fig.41) viewed from above shows three protuberances, respectively termed prosencephalon, mes- encephalon, and metencephalon, the two anterior of which are paired, the hindmost being single. The foremost pair are the hemispheres, which are solid in their interior, and provided with two swellings in front, the olfactory lobes. The second pair are the optic lobes, which generally are larger than the hemispheres, and succeeded by the third single portion, the Fig. 41.—Brain of Perch. I. Upper aspect. II. Lower aspect. a, cerebellum ; b, optic lobes ; c, hemispheres ; ¢, lobi inferiores ; /, hypophysis ; g, lobi posteriores ; 7, Olfactory lobes ; n, NV. opticus; 0, NV. olfactorius ; p, N. oculo-motorius ; g, NV. trochlearis ; 7, NV. trigeminus ; s, JV. acusticus ; t, NV. vagus ; wu, NV. abducens ; v, Fourth ventricle. cerebellum. In the fresh state the hemispheres are of a grayish colour, and often show some shallow depressions on their H 98 FISHES. surface; a narrow commissure of white colour connects them with each other. The optic lobes possess a cavity (ventriculus lobioptict), atthe bottom of which some protuberances of variable development represent the corpora quadrigemina of higher anunals. On the lower surface of the base of the optic lobes, behind the erura cerebri, two swellings are observed, the lobe inferiores, which slightly diverge in front for the passage of the infundibulum, from which a generally large hypophysis or pituitary gland is suspended. The relative size of the cere- bellum varies greatly in the different osseous fishes: in the Tunny and Silurus it is so large as nearly to cover the optic lobes; sometimes distinct transverse grooves and a median longitudinal groove are visible. The cerebellum possesses in its interior a cavity which communicates with the anterior part of the fourth ventricle. The medulla oblongata is broader than the spinal chord, and contains the fourth ventricle, which forms the continuation of the central canal of the spinal chord. In most fishes a perfect roof is formed over the fourth ventricle by two longitudinal pads, which meet each other in the median line (obi posteriores), and but rarely it remains open along its upper surface. The brain of Ganoid fishes shows great similarity to that of the Teleostei; however, there is considerable diversity of the arrangement of its various portions in the different types. In the Sturgeons and Polypterus (Fig. 42) the hemi- spheres are more or less remote from the mesencephalon, so that in an upper view the crura cerebri, with the intermediate entrance into the third ventricle (fisswra cerebri magna), may be seen. A vascular membranous sac, containing lymphatic fluid (epiphysis), takes its origin from the third ventricle, its base being expanded over the anterior interspace of the optic lobes, and the apex being fixed to the cartilaginous roof of the cranium. This structure is not pecuhar to the Ganoids, but found in various stages of development in Teleosteans, mark- BRAIN. 99 ing, when present, the boundary between prosencephalon and mesencephalon. The lobi optici are essentially as in Tele- osteans. The cerebellum penetrates into the ventriculus lobi optici, and extends thence into the open sinus rhomboid- alis. At its upper surface it is crossed by a commissure formed by the corpora restiformia of the medulla. Fig. 42.—Brain of Polypterus. (After Miiller.) I., Upper; II., Lateral ; III., Lower aspect. a, Medulla ; 0, corpora restiformia ; ¢, cerebellum ; d, lobi optici; e, hypophysis ; f, fissura cerebri magna; g, nervus opticus; g’, chiasma; h, hemispheres ; Z, lobus olfactorius ; %, sinus rhomboidalis (fourth ventricle). As regards external configuration, the brain of Lepidosteus and Amia approach still more the Teleosteous type. The prosencephalon, mesencephalon, and metencephalon are con- tiguous, and the cerebellum lacks the prominent transverse commissure at its upper surface. The sinus rhomboidalis is open. The brain of the Dipnoi shows characters reminding us of that of the Ganoids as well as the Chondropterygians, Ceratodus agreeing with Protopterus in this respect, as im ; 100 FISHES. most other points of its organisation. The hemispheres form the largest part of the brain; they are coalescent, as in Sharks, but possess two lateral ventricles, the separation being externally indicated by a shallow median groove on the upper surface. The olfactory lobes take their origin from the upper anterior end of the hemispheres. Epiphysis and hypophysis well developed. The lobi optici are very small, and remote from the prosencephalon, their division into the lateral halves being indicated by a median groove only. The cerebellum is very small, overlying the front part of the sinus rhomboidalis. The brain of Chondropterygians (Fig. 45) is more developed than that of all other fishes, and distinguished by well-marked characters. These are, first, the prolongation of the olfactory lobes into more or less long pedicles, which dilate into great ganglionic masses, where they come into contact with the olfactory sacs ; secondly, the space which generally intervenes between prosencephalon and mesencephalon, as in some Ganoids; thirdly, the large development of the metencephalon. The hemispheres are cenerally large, coalescent, Fig. 43.—Brain of Carcharias. (After Owen.) ; f : but with a median, longi- ac, Nerv. acusticus ; 0, corpus restiforme ; c, ae ty ete cerebellum ; d, lobus opticus; e, hypo- tudinal, dividing groove. physis; g, nervus opticus; f, hemi- Frequently their surface sphere ; 7, lobus olfactorius ; 2’, olfactory = pedicle ; , nerv. olfactorius ; 7, epiphysis ; m, nerv. oculo-motorius ; #7, nervy. trige- and when they are pro- minus ; v, nerv. vagus. shows traces of gyrations, vided with lateral vent- ricles, tubercles representing corpora striata may be ob- served. The olfactory pedicles take their origin from the side of the hemispheres, and are frequently hollow, and if so, their cavity communicates with the ventricle of the hemisphere. The optic lobes are generally smaller than the BRAIN. 101 hemispheres, coalescent, and provided with an upper median eroove like the prosencephalon. At their base a pair of lobi inferiores are constant, with the hypophysis and saccus vascu- losus (a conglomeration of vascular loops without medullary substance) between them. The cerebellum is very large, overlying a portion of the optic lobes and of the sinus rhomboidalis, and is frequently transversely grooved. The side-walls of the fourth ventricle, which are formed by the corpora restiformia, are singularly folded, and appear as two pads, one on each side of the cere- bellum (lobi posteriores s. lobi nervi trigemine). The brain of the Cyclostomes (Figs. 44, 45) represents a type different from that of other fishes, showing at its upper surface Fig. 44.—Brain of Bdellostoma, (Enlarged, after Miiller.) I., Upper; II., Lower aspect. Letters as in Fig. 45. three pairs of protuberances in front of the cerebellum ; they are all solid. Their homologies are not yet satisfactorily deter- mined, parts of the Myxinoid brain having received by the same observers determinations very different from those given 102 FISHES. to the corresponding parts of the brain of the Lampreys. The / i ZZ EZ Lae Comephoride enue: Oinnes Gadide [marine ]— Lota : ; ‘ : Lae lb Siluridee— Silurina [India, Africa] . 5 ,, 4, NORTHERN ZONE. 243 Europo-Asiatic. N. American. Bagrina . : ‘ 2 species. 0 species. Amiurina , : , i rs Seles Salmonide. ‘ : : : S07: LNB ack Percopside : ; ‘ We vows 1 eee Esocide . : : , : | te (ae Umbride Prat 28 1 ae Cyprinodontid Canty ore ean Africa, Neotrop.] . : Seat 30: Heteropygii : : : OM 5, Dig re Cyprinidze— Catostomina . ; jks HAS) arp Cyprinina [India, Ne eS Oumar 30. Leuciscina : : : (Oe ee, Ol oe thodeina ; On” y.,3 Ora. Abramidina [India, hema AE a HORS Cobitidina [India]. : DOLE a. O1ass Hyodontide . : OM,.a by ls, Petromyzontide soutien Zone Les, Shas 360 species. 339 species. A. The Europo-ASIATIc (PALHARCTIC) REGION.—Its western and southern boundaries coincide with those of the Northern Zone, so that only those which divide it from North America have to be indicated. Behring’s Strait and the Kamtschatka Sea have been conventionally taken as the boundary, but this is shown to be artificial by the fact that the animals of both coasts, as far as they are known at present, are not suf- ficiently distinct to be referred to two distinct regions. As to the freshwater fishes those of North-western America and of Kamtschatka are but imperfectly known, but there can be little doubt that the same agreement exists between them as is the case with other classes of animals. The Japanese islands exhibit a decided Palearctic fish-fauna, which includes Barbus and Cobitioids, forms strange to the North American fauna. A slight influx of tropical forms is perceived in the 244 FISHES. south of Japan, where two Bagrina (Pseudobagrus aurantiacus and Liocassis longirostris) have established themselves for a considerable period, for both are peculiar to the island, and have not been found elsewhere. In the east, as well as in the west, the distinction between the Europo-Asiatic and North American regions disappears almost entirely the farther we advance towards the north. Of four species of the genus Salmo known from Iceland, one (S. salar) is common to both regions, two are European (S. fario and S. alpinus), and one is a peculiarly Icelandic race (S. nivalis). As far as we know the Salmonoids of Greenland and Baffin’s Land they are all most closely allied to European species, though they may be distinguished as local races. Finally, as we have seen above, the Europo-Asiatic fauna mingles with African and Indian forms in Syria, Persia, and Afghanistan. Capoéta, a Cyprinoid genus, is characteristic of this district, and well represented in the Jordan and rivers of Mesopotamia. Assuming that the distribution of Cyprinoids has taken its origin from the alpine tract of country dividing the Indian and Palearctic regions, we find that this type has found in the temperate region as equally favourable conditions for its devel- opment as in the tropical. Out of the 560 species known to exist in the Palearctic regions, no less than 215 are Cyprin- oids. In the countries and on the plateaus immediately joining the Himalayan ranges those mountain forms which we mentioned as peculiar to the Indian Alps abound and extend for a considerable distance towards the west and east, mixed with other Cyprinina and Cobitidina. The represent- atives of these two groups are more numerous in Central and Eastern Asia than in Europe and the northern parts of Asia, where the Leuciscina predominate. Abramidina or Breams are more numerous in the south and east of Asia, but they spread to the extreme north-western and northern limits, to EUROPO-ASIATIC REGION. 245 which the Cyprinoid type reaches. The Rhodeina are a small family especially characteristic of the East, but with one or two off-shoots im Central Europe. Very significant is the appearance in China of a species of the Catostomina, a group otherwise limited to North America. The Cyprinoids, in their dispersal from the south north- wards, are met from the opposite direction by the Salmonoids. These fishes are, without doubt, one of the youngest families of Teleoster, for they did not appear before the Pliocene era; they flourished at any rate during the glacial period, and, as is testified by the remnants which we find in isolated elevated positions, like the Trout of the Atlas, of the moun- tains of Asia-Minor, and of the Hindu Kush, they spread to the extreme south of this region. At the present day they are most numerously represented in its northern temperate parts; towards the south they become scarcer, but increase again in numbers and species, wherever a great elevation offers them the snow-fed waters which they affect. In the rivers of the Mediterranean Salmonoids are by no means scarce, but they prefer the upper courses of those rivers, and do not migrate to the sea. The Pike, Umbra, several species of Perch and Stickle- back, are also clearly autochthont species of this region. Others belong to marine types, and seem to have been re- tained in fresh water at various epochs: thus the freshwater Cottus (Miller’s Thumb) ; Cottus quadricornis, which inhabits lakes of Seandinavia, whilst other individuals of the same species are strictly marine; the Burbot (Lota vulgaris) ; and the singular Comephorus, a dwarfed and much-changed Gadoid which inhabits the greatest depths of Lake Baikal. Remnants of the Palsichthyic fauna are the Stwrgeons and Lampreys. The former inhabit in abundance the great rivers of Eastern Europe and Asia, periodically ascending them from the sea; their southernmost limits are the Yang- 246 FISHES. tse-kiang in the east, and rivers flowing into the Adriatic, Black and Caspian Seas, and Lake Aral, towards the centre of this region. None are known to have gone beyond the boundaries of the Northern Zone. If the Lampreys are justly reckoned among Freshwater fishes, their distribution is unique and exceptional. In the Paleearctic region some of the species descend periodically to the sea, whilst others remain stationary in the rivers; the same has been observed in the Lampreys of North America. They are entirely absent in the Equatorial Zone, but reappear in the Temperate Zone of the Southern Hemisphere. Many points of the organ- isation of the Cyclostomes indicate that they are a type of ereat antiquity. The remaining Palearctic fishes are clearly immigrants from neighbouring regions: thus Siluwrus, Macrones, and Pseudobagrus from the Indian region; Amiwrus (and, as mentioned above, Catostomus) from North America. The Cyprinodonts are restricted to the southern and warmer parts ; all belong to the carnivorous division. The facility with which these fishes accommodate themselves to a sojourn in fresh, brackish, or salt water, and even in thermal springs, renders their general distribution easily compre- hensible, but it is impossible to decide to which region they originally belonged; their remains in tertiary deposits round the Mediterranean are not rare. B. The boundaries of the NorrH AMERICAN or NEARCTIC REGION have been sufficiently indicated. The main features and the distribution of this fauna are identical with those of the preceding region, The proportion of Cyprinoid species to the total number of North-American fishes (135 :339) appears to be considerably less than in the Palzearctic region, but we cannot admit that these figures approach the truth, as the Cyprinoids of North America have been much less NORTH AMERICAN REGION, 247 studied than those of Europe; of many scarcely more than the name is known. ‘This also applies in a great measure to the Salmonoids, of which only half as many as are found in the Palearctic region have been sufficiently described to be worthy of consideration. North America will, without doubt, in the end show as many distinct races as Europe and Asia. Cyprinoids, belonging to genera living as well as extinct, existed in North America in the tertiary period. At present, Cyprinina, Leuciscina, and Abramidina are well represented, but there is no representative of the Old World genus Barbus, or of the Cobitidina! ; Rhodeina are also absent. On the other hand, a well-marked Cyprinoid type is developed — the Catostomina, of which one species has, as it were, re- turned into Asia. Very characteristic is the group of Centrar- china, allied to the Perch, of which there are some thirty species; two Grystina. Of the Sticklebacks there are as many species as in Europe, and of Pike not less than seven species have been distinguished. Umbra appears to be as local as in Europe. Some very remarkable forms, types of distinct families, though represented by one or two species only, complete the number of North American autochthont fishes—viz., Aphredoderus, Percopsis, Hyodon, and the Heter- opygit (Amblyopsis and Chologaster). The last are allied to the Cyprinodonts, differing from them in some points of the structure of their intestines. The two genera are extremely sunilar, but Chologaster, which is found in ditches of the rice- fields of South Carolina, is provided with eyes, and lacks the ventral fins. Amblyopsis is the celebrated Blind Fish of the Mammoth Cave of Kentucky: colourless, eyeless, with rudi- mentary ventral fins, which may be occasionally entirely absent. 1 Cope has discovered in a tertiary freshwater-deposit at Idaho an extinct genus of this group, Diastichus. He considers this interesting fact to be strongly suggestive of continuity of territory of Asia and North America. — **Proc. Am. Phil, Soc. 1873,” p. 55. 248 FISHES. A peculiar feature of the North American Fish Fauna is that it has retained, besides the Sturgeons and Lampreys, representatives of two Ganoid families, Zepidosteus and Ama. Both these genera existed in tertiary times: the former occurs in tertiary deposits of Europe as well as North America, whilst fossil remains of Amia have been found in the Western Hemisphere only. It is difficult to account for the presence of the Amzurina in North America. They form a well-marked division of the Bagrina, which are well represented in Africa and the East Indies, but absent in South America; it is evident, therefore, they should not be regarded as immigrants from the south, as is the case with the Palearctic Siluroids. Nor, again, has the connection between South and North America been established sufficiently long to admit of the supposition that these Siluroids could have spread in the interval from the south to the northern parts of the continent, for some of the species are found as far north as Pine Islands Lake (54° lat. N.)? III. SouTHERN ZONE. The boundaries of this zone have been indicated in the description of the Equatorial Zone ; they overlap the southern boundaries of the latter in South Australia and South America, but we have not at present the means of exactly defining the limits to which southern types extend north- wards. This zone includes Tasmania with at least a por- tion of South-eastern Australia (Zasmanian sub-region), New Zealand and the Auckland Islands (New Zealand sub-region), and Chili, Patagonia, Terra del Fuego, and the Falkland Islands (Fuegian sub-region). No freshwater fishes are known 1 Leidy describes a Siluroid (Pimelodus) from tertiary deposits of Wyoming Territory. ‘‘Contrib. to the Extinct Vert. Fauna of the Western Territ. 1873,” p. 198. SOUTHERN ZONE. 249 from Kerguelen’s Land, or from islands beyond 55° lat. 8. The southern extremity of Africa has to be excluded from this zone so far as Freshwater fishes are concerned. This zone is, with regard to its extent as well as to the number of species, the smallest of the three; yet its ichthyological features are well marked ; they consist in the presence of two peculiar families, each of which is analogous to a northern type, viz. the Haplochitonide, which represent the Salmonide, Haplochiton being the analogue of Salmo, and Prototroctes that of Coregonus; and the Galaxiude, which are the Pikes of the Southern Hemisphere. Although geographically widely separate from each other, the Freshwater fishes of the three divisions are nevertheless so closely allied that conclusions drawn from this group of animals alone would hardly justify us in regarding these divisions as sub-regions. One species of Galaxias (Gt. attenu- atus) and the three Lampreys are found in all three, or at least two, sub-regions. Freshwater Fishes of the Southern Zone. Tasmanian. N. Zealand. Fuegian. Percichthys : : : ws oe 3 Siluridze— Diplomystax . : : ae ee 1 Nematogenys . : ; wee a 1 Trichomycterina [Neotrop.] ... Gadopside . 1 oe rf (Retropinna 1 Seo hy. Haplochitonide . 1 1 1 Galaxude . 6 5 4 Petromyzontide 3 1 3 11 8 18 But little remains to be added in explanation of this list ; Percichthys is in Chili the autochthont form of the cos- 250 FISHES. mopolitan group of Percina. Diplomystax, an Arioid fish of Chili, and Nematogenys seem to have crossed the Andes from - Tropical America at a comparatively early period, as these genera are not represented on the eastern side of South America; the Z'richomycterina occur on both sides of the Andes, which they ascend to a considerable height. Retvo- pinna is a true Salmonoid, allied to, and representing in the Southern Hemisphere the Northern Smelt, Osmerus. In both these genera a part of the specimens live in the sea, and ascend rivers periodically to spawn ; another part remain in rivers and lakes, where they propagate, never descending to the sea, this freshwater race being constantly smaller than their marine brethren. That this small Teleostean of the Northern Hemisphere should reappear, though in a generic- ally modified form, in New Zealand, without having spread over other parts of the Southern Zone, is one of the most remarkable, and at present inexplicable facts of the geo- graphical distribution of freshwater fishes. Fig. 104.—Haplochiton zebra, Straits of Magelhen. CHAPTER XVIII. THE FISHES OF THE BRACKISH WATER. ON such parts of a coast at which there is a mixture of fresh and salt water, either in consequence of some river empty- ing its water into the sea or from an accumulation of land surface water forming lagunes, which are in uninterrupted or temporary communication with the sea, there flourishes a peculiar brackish water fauna which is characterised by the presence of fishes found sometimes in sea-, sometimes in pure fresh-water. This fauna can be rather sharply defined if a limited district only is taken into consideration ; thus, the species of the brackish water fauna of Great Britain, the Pacific coast of Central America, of the larger East India Islands, ete., can be enumerated without much hesitation. But difficulties arise When we attempt to generalise in the enumeration of the forms referable to the brackish water fauna; because the genera and families enumerated include certain species and genera which have habituated themselves exclusively either to a freshwater or marine existence; and, besides, because a species of fish may be at one locality an inhabitant of brackish water, at another of the sea, and at a third of fresh water. The circumstance that these fishes can live in sea and fresh water has enabled them to spread readily over the globe, a few only being limited to particular regions; there- fore, for the purposes of dividing the earth’s surface into natural zoological regions the brackish water forms are useless. The following fishes may be referred to this Fauna :— bo On bo FISHES. 1. Species of Rajidw (Raja, Trygon) prefer the mouths of rivers, probably because the muddy or sandy bottom offers the most suitable conditions for fishes which can feed on the bottom only; such brackish water species belong chiefly to the Equatorial Zone, some having taken up their abode entirely in fresh water (South American Trygons). 2. Ambassis, a Percoid genus, consisting of numerous small species, inhabiting the shores of the tropical parts of the Indian Ocean- and the coasts of Tropical Australia. Many species enter, and all seek the neighbourhood of, fresh water ; hence they disappear in the islands of the Pacific, and are scarce in the Red Sea. 3. Therapon, with the same distribution as the former. 4, Numerous Sciwnide of the Equatorial Zone. 5. The Polynemide, chiefly inhabitants of brackish water of the Equatorial Zone, most developed in the Indian region, and scarce in the Tropical Pacific. 6. Numerous species of Caranxz (or Horse Mackerels) of the Equatorial Zone. 7. Nearly all species of Gastrosteus enter brackish water, G. spinachia being almost exclusively confined to it: Northern Zone. 8. The most important genera of the Gobies (Gobina) : Gobius (nearly cosmopolitan), Sieydiwm, Boleophthalmus, Peri- ophthalmus, Eleotris (equatorial). Many of the species are entirely confined to fresh water. 9. The Amblyopina, similar to the Gobies, but with more elongated body : Tropical Indo-Pacific. 10. The 7rypauchenina : Coasts of the Indian region. 11. Many species of Blennius, of which several are found far inland in fresh waters—for instance in North Italy, in the Lake of Galilee, in the eastern parts of Asia Minor. 12. The majority of Atherinide, and FISHES OF BRACKISH WATER. 253 13. The Mugilide: both families being most numerous and abundant in brackish water, and almost cosmopolitan. 14. Many Plewronectide prefer the mouths of rivers for the same reason as the Rays; some ascend rivers, as the Flounder, Cynoglossus, ete. 15. Several Stluridw, as especially the genera Plotosus, Cnidoglanis, Arius, which attain their greatest development in brackish water. 16. The Cyprinodontide are frequently found in brackish water. 17. Species of Clupea, some of which ascend rivers, and become acclimatized in fresh water, as Clupea jfinta, which has established itself in the lakes of northern Italy. 18. Chatoessus, a genus of Clupeoid fishes of the Equatorial Zone, of which some species have spread into the Northern Zone. 19. Megalops : Equatorial Zone. 20. Anguilla. The distribution, no less than the mode of propagation, and the habits generally, of the so-called Freshwater-eels still present us with many difficult prob- lems. As far as we know at present their birthplace seems to be the coast in the immediate neighbourhood of the mouths of rivers. They are much more frequently found in fresh water than in brackish water, but the distribution of some species proves that they at times migrate by sea as well as by land and river. Thus Anguilla mauritiana is found in almost all the fresh and brackish waters of the islands of the Tropical Indian Ocean and Western Pacific, from the Comoros to the South Sea; Anguilla vulgaris is spread over temperate Europe (exclusive of the system of the Danube, the Black and Caspian Seas), in the Mediterranean district (including the Nile and rivers of Syria), and on the Atlantic coast of North America; Anguilla bostoniensis, in Eastern North America, China, and Japan; Anguzlla lati- 254 FISHES. rostris, in Temperate Europe, the whole Mediterranean dis- trict, the West Indies, China, and New Zealand. The other more local species are found, in addition to localities already mentioned, on the East Coast of Africa, South Africa, on the continent of India, various East Indian Islands, Australia, Tasmania, Auckland Islands ; but none have ever been found in South America, the West Coast of North America, and the West Coast of Africa: surely one of the most striking instances of irregular geographical distribution. 21. Numerous Syngnathide have established themselves in the Northern Zone as well as in the Equatorial, in the vege- tation which flourishes in brackish water. This list could be considerably increased if an enumera- tion of species, especially of certain localities, were attempted ; but this is more a subject of local interest, and would carry us beyond the scope of a general account of the distribution of Fishes. Fig. 105.—Mugil octo-radiatus. Fig. 106.—Mugil auratus. Fig. 107.—Mugil septentrionalis. Heads of Grey Mullets, fishes of Brackish water. CHAPTER XIX. THE DISTRIBUTION OF MARINE FISHES. MARINvE fishes fall, with regard to their mode of life and dis- tribution, into three distinct categories :— 1. Shore Fishes—That is, fishes which inhabit chiefly parts of the sea in the immediate neighbourhood of land either actually raised above, or at least but little submerged below, the surface of the water. They do not descend to any great depth,—very few to 300 fathoms, and the majority live close to the surface. The distribution of these fishes is determined not only by the temperature of the surface water but also by the nature of the adjacent land, and its animal and vegetable products ; some of these fishes being confined to flat coasts with soft or sandy bottoms, others to rocky and fissured coasts, others to living coral formations. If it were not for the frequent mechanical and involuntary removals to which these fishes are exposed, their distribution within cer- tain limits, as it no doubt originally existed, would resemble still more that of freshwater fishes than we find it actually does at the present period. 2. Pelagic Fishes—that is, fishes which inhabit the sur- face and uppermost strata of the open ocean, which approach the shores only accidentally, or occasionally (in search of prey), or periodically (for the purpose of spawning). The majority spawn in the open sea, their ova and young being always found at great distance from the shore. With regard to their distribution, they are still subject to the influences of light and the temperature of the surface water; but they are 256 FISHES. independent of the variable local conditions which tie the shore fish to its original home, and therefore roam freely over a space which would take a freshwater or shore fish thousands of years to cover in its gradual dispersal. Such as are devoid of rapidity of motion are dispersed over simi- larly large areas by the oceanic currents, more slowly than, but as surely as, the strong swimmers. Therefore, an accu- rate definition of their distribution within certain areas equi- valent to the terrestrial regions is much less feasible than in the case of shore fishes. 3. Deep-sea Fishes—that is, fishes which mhabit such depths of the ocean as to be but little or not influenced by light or the surface temperature ; and which, by their organ- isation are prevented from reaching the surface stratum in a healthy condition. Living almost under identical tellurian conditions, the same type, the same species, may inhabit an abyssal depth under the equator as well as one near the arctic or antarctic circle; and all we know of these fishes points to the conclusion that no separate horizontal regions can be distinguished in the abyssal fauna, and that no division into bathymetrical strata can be attempted on the base of generic much less of family characters. It must not be imagined that these three categories are more sharply defined than Freshwater and Marine Fishes. They gradually pass into each other, and there are numerous fishes about which uncertainty exists whether they should be placed in the Shore or Pelagic series, or in the Pelagic or Deep-sea series ; nay, many facts favour the view that changes in the mode of life and distribution of fishes are still in progress. The change in habitat of numerous fishes is regulated by the distribution of their favourite food. At certain seasons the surface of the sea in the vicinity of land swarms with mollusks, larval Crustaceans, Medusze, attracting shoals of SHORE FISHES. 257 fishes from the open ocean to the shores ; and these are again pursued by fishes of larger size and predacious habits, so that all these fishes might be included, with equal propriety, in the littoral or pelagic series. However, species which are known to normally spawn in the open ocean must be always referred to the latter division. Chondropterygu, Acanthopterygu, Anacanths, Myxinoids, and. Pharyngobranchi furnish the principal contingents to the Marine Fauna; whilst the majority of Malacopterygians, the Ganoids, and Cyclostomes are Freshwater Fishes. I.—DISTRIBUTION OF SHORE FISHES. The principal types of Shore-fishes are the following : — CHONDROPTERYGII— HOLOCEPHALA ; . ; 4 species. PLAGIOSTOMATA— Carcharuide (part.) ee ee Scylliide 30 ss Cestraciontide AS 55 Spinacide (part.) Sil 5. Rhinide il Pristiophoride ae Pristide Bi as Rhinobatide Jay Torpedinide . i : 13) Rajide ; 5 : pie oy Trygonidee 47 55 ACANTHOPTERYGII— Percide (part. incl. Pristipomatide) . 625 _,, Mullide . : A 3 3199 ss Sparide ‘ , ; Ae ENS OMe Squamipinnes . : : so lSOigss Cirrhitide ; : ‘ eee) 258 FISHES. Psychrolutide . Centriscider Fistulariidee Heterolepidina . ; : . 12 species. Scorpenide . ; ; « 1200 Cottide (part.) : : » LOO Cataphracti (part.) ‘ , 2055 Trachinide ‘ ‘ . 100s Scuenide : : . L0Ot Sphyrenide . : ; » At Pee Trichiuride . ; ; : ieee Elacate ‘ ; : : 1 3 Nomeide (part.) bk: Cyttidee Saale Stromateus : : . 9. 4%; Mene . ; . : : | ie Carangide (part.) » oO Kurtide 1, Gobiodon : ; ieee Callionymina . : : : 30 ae: Discoboli : ; ; : 18! E 3 Batrachide . 5 : ». « iA Pediculati (part.) ; 5 : iil _ Blenniidee as : : . 20 Acanthoclinidee : : ; 1 Teuthidide . : ; ; SOE Acronuride . : : : 60 FToplognathide. 5 an Malacanthide 3: es Plesiopina 4 Trichonotide 2°93 Cepolide (ero Gobiesocide. 21 2 7 4 ACANTHOPTERYGII PHARYNGOGNATHI— Pomacentride . f : > 1505 Labride . : : « 400° 7 Embiotocide : : ; eli SHORE FISHES. 259 ANACANTHINI— Gadopside : : : ‘ 1 species. Lycodidee i j ' ; Lor Gadide (part.) . ; bh ; DOM ws Ophidiidee (part.) ; Ae Pleuronectide . : : , H6Ow <5, PHYSOSTOMI— Saurina (part.) . , : GE 43 Salmonide. (part.) ‘ : ; i rr Clupeide (part.) . : ‘ : 130). ,, Chirocentride 2 ' : ; 1 - Chilobranchus . : ‘ 1 5 Murenide (part.) ‘ : ; 200 =z Pegaside ; : : : Bee LOPHOBRANCHII : : ; ; L200, PLECTOGNATHI— Sclerodermi : : : : Dae ace Gymnodontes : ; 835.5 CYCLOSTOMATA— MYXINID& , ; : ‘ 5 PP LEPTOCARDILI : ; : ; oe ie 3587 species. These types of Shore fishes are divided among the fol- lowing oceanic are :— I. The Arctic Ocean. II. The Northern Temperate Zone. A. The Temperate North Atlantic. 1. The British district. 2. The Mediterranean district. 3. The North American district. B. The Temperate North Pacific. 1. The Kamtschatkan district. 2. The Japanese district, 3. The Californian district. 260 FISHES III. The Equatorial Zone. A. The Tropical Atlantic. B. The Tropical Indo-Pacific. C. The Pacific Coast of Tropical America. 1. The Central American district. 2. The Galapagoes district. 3. The Peruvian district. IV. The Southern Temperate Zone. 1, The Cape of Good Hope district. 2. The South Australian district. 3. The Chilian district. 4, The Patagonian district. V. The Antarctic Ocean. As with freshwater fishes, the main divisions of the Shore- fish faunee are determined by their distance from the equator, the equatorial zone of the Freshwater series corresponding entirely to that of the Shore-fish series. But as Marie fishes extend farther towards the Poles than Freshwater fishes, and as the polar types are more specialised, a distinct Aretic and Antarctic fauna may be separated from the faune of the temperate zones. The two subdivisions of the Northern temperate zone in the Freshwater series are quite analogous to the corresponding divisions in the Coast series. In the Southern Hemisphere the Shore-fishes of the extremity of Africa form a separate district of the temperate zone, whilst the Freshwater fishes of South Africa were found to be tropical types. The Marine series of the Southern temperate zone is also much more diversified than the Freshwater series, and admits of further subdivision, which, although in some degree indicated in the Freshwater series, does not entirely correspond to that proposed for the latter. ARCTIC SHORE FISHES. 261 I. SHORE FISHES OF THE ARCTIC OCEAN. The Shore fishes clearly prove a continuity of the Arctic circumpolar fauna, as the southern limit of which we may indicate the southern extremity of Greenland and the Aleu- tian Archipelago, or 60° of lat. N. Towards the North, fishes become less in variety of species and fewer in number of individuals, and only very few genera are restricted to this fauna. The highest latitude at which Shore fishes have been observed is 83° N. lat. The late Arctic Expedition collected at and near that latitude specimens of Cottus quadricornis, Icelus hamatus, Cyclopterus spinosus, Liparis fabricir, Gymnelis viridis, and Gadus fabricii. This number probably would have been larger if the difficulties of collecting fishes in those high latitudes were not almost insuperable for the greater part of the year. As far as we know, the fishes north and south of Behring’s Straits belong to the same generic or family types as those of the corresponding latitudes of the Eastern Hemisphere, though the majority are specifically distinct. But the infor- mation we possess of the fishes of the northernmost extremity of the Pacific is extremely scanty and vague. Farther south, whence now and then a collection reaches Europe, we meet with some European species, as the Herring, Holibut, Hake. The Chondropterygians are very scarce, and it is doubtful whether another Chondropterygian, beside the pelagic Lwm- argus or Greenland Shark, crosses the Arctic circle. In the more temperate latitudes of South Greenland, Iceland, and Northern Scandinavia, Acanthias, Centroscyllium, and a species of Raja, also Chimera, are met with. Of Acanthopterygians the families of Cottidw, Cataphracta, Discoboli, and Blenniide are well represented, and several of the 262 FISHES. genera are characteristic of the Arctic fauna: marine species of Cottus ; Centridermichthys, Icelus, Triglops ; Agonus, Aspi- dophoroides ; Anarrhichas, Centronotus, Sticheus ; Cyclopterus and Liparis. Two species of Sebastes are rather common. Characteristic is also the development of Gadoid fishes, of which some thirteen species, belonging to Gadus, Merluccius, and Molva, form one of the principal articles of food to the inhabitants of the coasts of the Arctic Ocean. The Blennioid Anacanthini or Lycodide, are limited to the Arctic and An- tarctic coasts. Ammodytes and a few Flat-fishes (Hippo- glossoides and Plewronectes) are common in the more temperate parts. Labroids only exceptionally penetrate so far towards the north. Physostomes are very scarce, and represented only by a few species of Clupea and by Mallotus; the latter is an ancient in- habitant of the Greenland coasts, fossil remains, indistinguish- able from the species of the present day, being frequently found in nodules of clay of comparatively recent formation. The Arctic climate is still less favourable to the existence of Lophobranchs, only a few Syngnathus and Nerophis bemg present in the more southern latitudes, to which they have been carried by oceanic currents from their more congenial home in the south. Scleroderms and Plectognaths are entirely absent. The Gadoids are accompanied by Myaxine, which parasiti- cally thrives in them. II. THE NorrHERN TEMPERATE ZONE. A. Shore Fishes of the Temperate North Atlantic. This part of the fauna may be subdivided into three districts :— TEMPERATE NORTH ATLANTIC. 263 1. The fishes of the north-eastern shores, viz. of the British islands, of Scandinavia so far as it is not included in the Arctic fauna, and of the continent of Europe southwards to about 40° of lat. Ni— British district. 2. The fishes of the Mediterranean shores and of the adjoming shores of the Atlantic, including the Azores, Madeira, and the Canary Islands—Mediterranean district. 3. The fishes of the western shores, from 60° lat. N. to about 30° lat. Ni—the North American district. 1. The British district shows scarcely any marked dis- tinctive features; the character of its fauna is simply intermediate between that of the Arctic Ocean and the Mediterranean district ; truly Arctic forms disappear, while such as are also found in the Mediterranean make their appearance. Also with regard to the abundance of individuals and variety of fishes this district forms a transition from the north towards the south. Besides the few Arctic Chondropterygians, all of which extend into this district, the small shore Dog-fishes are well represented (Mustelus, Galeus, Seyllwwm, Pristiwrus) ; the ubi- quitous Rhina or Monk-fish is common; of Rays, Raja pre- dominates in a variety of species over Torpedo and T'rygon, which are still scarce. Of Acanthopterygians, Centridermichthys, Icelus, Triglops, and Aspidophoroides, do not extend from the north into this district; and Cottus, Anarrhichas, Centronotus, Stichaus, the Discoboli disappear within its limits. Nearly all the remainder are genera which are also found in the Mediterranean districts. The following are the principal forms, and known to propagate on these shores: Labrax; Serranus, Polyprion, Dentex; Mullus ; Cantharus, Pagrus, Pagellus; Sebastes; Cottus, Trigla, Agonus ; Trachinus ; Sciena (?) ; Zeus; Trachurus, Capros ; Calliony- mus; Discoboli; Lophius; Anarrhichas, Centronotus, Stich- 264 FISHES. wus; Blenniops, Zoarces (not in Mediterranean); Cepola ; Lepadogaster. Of the Anacanthini the Gadoids are as numerous as in the Arctic Ocean, most being common to both districts ; they are represented by Gadus, Gadiculus, Merluccius, Phycis, Molva, Motella, Raniceps, and Brosmius; but, whilst the majority show their northern origin by not extending into the Mediterranean, Ammodytes and most Plewronectide prove themselves to be the more southern representatives of this order. In the British district we find Hippoglossus, Huppo- glossoides, Rhombus, Phrynorhombus, Pleuronectes, Solea, and only the two first are not met with in the Mediterranean. Labroids are common; with the exception of the North American Tautoga, all the other genera are met with. Physostomes are not well represented, viz. by one species of Osmerus, one of Engraulis, one of Conger, and about five of Clupea. Syngnathus and Nerophis become more common as we proceed southwards; but the existence of Scleroderms and Plectognaths is indicated by single individuals only, stragglers from their southern home, and unable to establish them- selves in a climate ungenial to them. The Gadoids are accompanied by Myxine ; and Branchio- stoma may be found in all suitable localities. 2. The Mediterranean district is distinguished by a great variety of forms; yet, with the exception of a few genera established for single species, none of the forms can be con- sidered peculiar to it; and even that small number of peculiar genera is more and more diminished as our know- ledge of the distribution of fishes advances. Some genera are identical with those found on the western coasts of the Atlantic and in the West Indies; but a most remarkable and unexpected affinity obtains with another very distant TEMPERATE NORTH ATLANTIC, 265 fauna, viz. that of Japan. The number of genera common to the Mediterranean district and the Japanese coasts is larger than that of the genera common to the Mediterranean and the opposite American coasts. The Chondropterygians found in the British district con- tinue in the Mediterranean, their number being increased by Centrina, Spinax, Pteroplatea, and some species of Rhinobatus, a genus more numerously represented in the Tropics. Tor- pedo and Trygon are common. The greatest variety belong to the Acanthopterygians, as will be seen from the following list :—Labrax ; Anthias, Serranus, Polyprion, Apogon, Pomatomus, Pristipoma, Dia- gramma (an Indian genus with two Mediterranean species, and otherwise not represented in the Atlantic), Dentex, Mena, Smaris ; Mullus ; Cantharus, Box, Scatharzs, Oblata, Sargus, Pagrus, Pagellus, Chrysophrys ; Sebastes, Scorpena ; Hoplo- stethus, Beryx, Polymixia; Trigla, Lepidotrigla, Agonus, Peristethus ; Trachinus, Uranoscopus; Umbrina, Scienea ; Sphyrena; Aphanopus, Lepidopus, Nesiarchus, Trichiurus, Thyrsites ; Cubieeps ; Zeus, Cyttus ; Stromateus ; Trachurus, Caranx, Capros, Diretmus, Antigonia ; Callionymus ; Ba- trachus ; Lophius; Cristiceps, Tripterygium ; Cepola ; Lepa- dogaster ; Centriscus ; Notacanthus. The ZLabridw are as common as, or even more so than, in the British district, and represented by the same genera. But, besides, some other Pharyngognaths, properly belonging to the Tropical Atlantic, have fully established themselves, though only by a few species, viz. Glyphidodon and Heliastes ; Cossyphus, Novacula, Julis, Coris, and Scarus. The Gadoids show a marked decrease of development ; and the species of Gadus, Gadiculus, Mora, Strinsia, Phycis, and Molva, which are peculiar to the Mediterranean, seem: to inhabit rather the colder water of moderate depths, than the surface near the shore. Motella, however, proves to be a true 266 FISHES. Shore fish also in the Mediterranean, at least in its adult state. Ophidiuwm and Fierasfer appear now besides Ammo- dytes. As the Gadoids decrease, so the Plewronectide increase, the genera of the Mediterranean district being Rhombus, Phrynorhombus, Arnoglossus, Citharus, Rhomboidichthys, Pleu- ronectes (a northern genus not extending farther southwards), Solea, Synaptura, and Ammoplewrops. The variety of Physostomes is small; the following only being superadded to those of the British district :—Sawrus (a tropical genus), Auwlopus ; Congromurena, Heteroconger, Myrus, Ophichthys, Murena. The Lophobranchs are more numerous in species and individuals than in the British district; and, besides Syngna- thus and Nerophis, several species of Hippocampus are common. Also a few species of Balistes occur. Myxine is lost in this district; whilst Branchiostoma is abundant. 3. The shore fishes of the North American district con- sist, as on the eastern coasts of the North Atlantic, of northern and southern elements; but they are still more mixed with each other than on the European coasts, so that a boundary line cannot be drawn between them. The affinity to the fauna of the eastern shores is great, but almost entirely limited to the genera composing the fauna of the British district. British genera not found on the American coasts are — Galeus, Scylluum, Chimera, Mullus, Pagellus, Trigla, Tra- chinus, Zeus, Callionymus. The southern elements of North America are rather derived from the West Indies, and have no special affinity to Mediterranean forms; very few of the non-British Mediterranean forms extend across the Atlan- tic; instead of a Mediterranean we find a West Indian element. Many of the British species range across the Atlantic, and inhabit in an unchanged condition the northern parts of TEMPERATE NORTH ATLANTIC. 267 this district; and from the frequent occurrence of isolated specimens of other British species on the North American coast, we may presume that many more occasionally cross the Atlantic, but without being able to obtain a permanent footing. The genera peculiar to this district are few in number, and composed of very few species, viz. Hemitripterus, Pam- melas, Chasmodes, Cryptacanthodes, and Tautoga. The close resemblance of what must be considered northern forms to those of Europe will be evident from the following list :— Mustelus, Rhina, Torpedo, Raja, Trygon. Labrax, Centropristis, Serranus; Pagrus, Chrysophrys ; Sebastes, Hemitripterus ; Cottus, Aspidophoroides ; Uranosco- pus ; Micropogon, Pogonias, Scena ; Trachurus, Pammelas ; Cyclopterus, Liparis; Lophius; Anarrhichas, Chasmodes, Sticheus, Centronotus, Cryptacanthodes, Zoarces. . Tautoga, Ctenolabrus. Gadus, Merluccius, Phycis, Molva, Motella, Brosinius ; Ophidium (one species, perhaps identical with a Mediterranean species) ; Ammodytes ; Hippoglossus, Hippoglossoides, Rhombus, Pleuronectes. Osmerus, Mallotus ; Engraulis, Clupea ; Conger. Syngnathus—Myxine—Branchiostoma. West Indian genera, or at least genera which are more developed within the tropics, and which extend more or less northwards in the North American district, are -— Pteroplatea (also in the Mediterranean). Gerres, Dules (auriga), Lobotes, Ephippus ; Sargus ; Priono- tus; Umbrina, Otolithus, Larimus ; Sphyrena (Mediterr.) ; Trichivrus (Mediterr.); Elacate; Cybium, Trachynotus; Stro- mateus (Mediterr.); Caranz ; Batrachus (Mediterr.) ; Malthe. Pseudorhombus, Solea (Mediterr.) Saurus (Mediterr.); Ltrumeus, Albula, Elops, Megalops. 268 FISHES Hippocampus (Mediterr.) Balistes, Monacanthus, B. Shore Fishes of the Temperate North Pacifie. This fauna shows a great affinity to that of the temperate North Atlantic, not only in including a considerable proportion of identical genera, and even of species, but also in having its constituent parts similarly distributed. However, our know- ledge of the ichthyology of this fauna is by no means com- plete. Very few collections have been made in Northern Japan, and on the coasts farther north of it; and, again, the ichthyology of the coasts of Southern California is but little known. Southern Japan has been well searched, but very little attention has been paid to the extent of the northward range of the species. In collections made by Mr. Swinhoe at Chefoo, in lat. 37° N., the proportions of temperate and tropical fishes were found to be about equal. Thus, the details of the distribution of the fishes of these shores have still to be worked out; nevertheless, three divisions may be recognised which, for the present, may be defined as follows :— 1. The fishes of the north-western shores, to about 37° lat. N., including the corresponding northern parts of Japan— Kamtschatkan (istrict ; this corresponds to the British district of the Atlantic. 2. The fishes of Southern Japan and the corresponding shores of the continent of Asia, between 37° and 30° lat. N.—Japanese district, which corresponds to the Mediter- ranean. 3. The fishes of the eastern shores southwards to the lati- tude of San Francisco—Californian district ; this corresponds to the North American district of the Atlantic. Too little is known of the shore fishes of the coasts between San Francisco and the tropic to enable us to treat of it as a separate division. TEMPERATE NORTH PACIFIC. 269 The Shore fishes of the North Pacific generally are com- posed of the following elements :— a. Arctic forms which extend into the Arctic Ocean, and the majority of which are also found in the British district. b. Peculiar forms limited to the North Pacific, like the Heterolepidina, Embiotocide, and certain Cottoid and Blen- nioid genera. c. Forms identical with fishes of the Mediterranean. d. Peculiar forms limited to the southern parts of Japan. e. Tropical forms which have entered the North Pacific from the south. 1. The small list of fishes which we can assign to the Kamtschatkan district is due rather to the imperfect manner in which its fauna has been explored than to its actual poverty of fishes ; thus, although we may be sure that sooner or later the small kinds of Dog-fishes of the British district will be found there also, at present we have positive know- ledge of the occurrence of only two Chondropterygians, viz. Chimera and Raja. The species of the latter genus seem to be much less numerous than in the Atlantic. Of Acanthopterygians the following are known :—Sebastes ; Chirus, Agrammus ; Podabrus, Blepsias, Cottus, Centridermich- thys, Hemilepidotus, Agonus ; Trichodon ; Callionymus; Liparis ; Dictyosoma, Sticheus, Centronotus. Labroids are absent; they are clearly a type unable to endure great cold; of the Embiotocoids which represent them in the Pacific, one species only (a species of Ditrema) is known from this district. The Gadoids are, so far as we know at present, sparsely represented, viz. by isolated species of Gadus, Motella, and Lotella, the latter being an inhabitant of moderate depths rather than of the surface. Aippoglossus, Plewronectes, and Parophrys, seem to occur everywhere at suitable localities. 270 FISHES. The Physostomes are nearly the same as in the British district, viz. a Smelt (Hypomesus), probably also the Arctic Mallotus, an Anchovy, several species of Clupea, and the Conger-eel. A very singular Salmonoid fish, Salanxz, which is limited to the north-western Pacific, occurs in great abund- ance, Also, the Lophobranchs correspond in their development to those of the British district, Nerophis being replaced by Urocampus. Neither Myxinoids nor Branchiostoma have as yet been found, 2. The Japanese district is, ike the Mediterranean, dis- tinguished by a great variety of forms ; some of them are peculiar to it (marked J. in the following list); others occur in the Mediterranean, though also in other districts (JL) The resemblance to the Mediterranean is even greater than would appear from the following list of genera, inasmuch as a considerable number of species are identical in both dis- tricts. Three of the Berycoid genera have hitherto been found in the Japanese and Mediterranean districts only, and nowhere else. Another very singular fact is that some of the most characteristic genera, like Mullus, Zeus, Calliony- mus, Centriscus, habit the Mediterranean and Japanese districts, but have never reached the opposite American coasts, either in the Atlantic or Pacific; although, at least in the latter, the oceanic currents would rather favour than ob- struct their dispersal in the direction towards America. Bold as the hypothesis may appear, we can only account for the singular distribution of these shore fishes by assuming that the Mediterranean and Japanese seas were in direct and open communication with each other within the period of the existence of the present Teleosteous Fauna. Gadoids have disappeared, or are represented by forms TEMPERATE NORTH PACIFIC. 271 inhabiting moderate depths. Neither Myxine nor Branchio- stoma are known to have as yet been found. List of Japanese Shore Fishes. Chimera (M.) Galeus (M.), Mustelus (M.), Triacis, Scylliwm (M.), Cros- sorhinus, Pristiophorus, Cestracion ; Rhina (M.) ; Rhinobatus (M.), Narcine, Raja (M.), Trygon (M.), Pteroplatea (M.) Percalabraz (J.), Niphon (J.), Centropristis, Anthias (M.), Serranus (M.), Apogon (M.), Scombrops (J.), Acropoma, Ano- plus (J.), Pristipoma (M.), Hapalogenys (J.), Histiopterus, Velifer (J.), Dentex (M.), Erythrichthys—Mullide (M.)— Girella, Pagrus (M.), Chrysophrys (M.)— Chilodactylus — Sebastes (M.), Scorpena (M.), Aploactis, Trichopleura, Pelor— Monocentris (J.), Hoplostethus (M.), Beryx (M.), Polymixia (M.) — Platycephalus, Hoplichthys (J.), Bembras (J.), Prionotus, Lepidotrigla (M.), Trigla (M.), Peristethus (M.)—Uranoscopus (M.), Percis, Sillago, Latilus.— Sciena (M.), Otolithus — Sphyrena (M.)—Lepidopus (M.), Trichiurus (M.)\—Zeus (M.) —Caranx, Trachurus (M.)—Callionymus (M.)—Lophius (M.), Halieuthwa (J.)\—Hoplognathus—Cepola (M.)—Centriscus (M.), Fistularia. Heliastes (M.)—Labrichthys, Duymeria, Platyglossus, Nova- cula (M.), Julis (M.), Corzs (M.) Strembo (J.)—Motella (M.)—Ateleopus (J.) Pseudorhombus, Pleuronectes (M.), Solea (M.), Synap- tura (M.) Saurus (M.), Harpodon—Salanz (J.)\—Engraulis (M.), Clupea (M.), Etrumeus—Conger (M.), Congromurena (M.), Murenesox (M.), Oxyconger, Myrus (M.), Ophichthys (M.), Mureena (M.) Syngnathus (M.), Hippocampus (M.), Solenognathus. Triacanthus, Monacanthus, Ostracion. HAT FISHES. 3. The Californian district includes a marked northern element, the principal constituents of which are identical with types occurring in the corresponding district of the Atlantic, viz. the North American, as exemplified by Discoboli, Anarr- hichas, Centronotus, Cottus, Hippoglossus, Clupea (harengus), etc. But it possesses also, in the greatest degree of development, some types almost peculiar to itself, as the Heterolepidina, some remarkable Cottoid and Blennioid genera, and more especially the Embiotocoids—viviparous Pharyngognaths — which replace the Labroids of the other hemisphere. Gadoids are much less numerous than in the North American district. The southern forms are but little known, but it may be anti- cipated that, owing to the partial identity of the Faun of the two coasts of the Isthmus of Panama, a fair proportion of West Indian forms will be found to have entered this district from the south. The following are the principal genera -— Chimera, Galeus, Mustelus, Triacis, Cestracion, Rhina, Raja. Serranus ; Chirus, Ophiodon, Zaniolepis ; Sebastes ; Nau- tichthys, Scorpenichthys, Cottus, Centridermichthys, Hemilept- dotus, Artedius, Prionotus, Agonus; Cyclopterus, Liparis ; Anarrhichas, Neoclinus, Cebidichthys, Sticheus, Centronotus, Apodichthys ; Psychrolutes ; Aulvscops. Embiotocide. Gadus. Hippoglossus, Psettichthys, Citharichthys, Para- lichthys, Pleuronectes, Parophrys. Osmerus, Thaleichthys, Hypomesus ; Engraulis, Clupea. Syngnathus. IIT.—THE EQUATORIAL ZONE. As we approach the Tropic from the north, the tribes characteristic of the Arctic and Temperate zones become scarcer, and disappear altogether: to be replaced by the ereater variety of Tropical types. Of Chondropterygians, the Chimeride, Spinacide, Mustelus, and Raja, do not pass the EQUATORIAL ZONE. 273 Tropic, or appear in single species only; and of Teleosteans, the Berycide, Pagrus, the Heterolepidina, Cottus and allied genera, Lophius, Anarrhichas, Sticheus, Lepadogaster, Psy- chrolutes, Centriscus, Notacanthus,the Labride and Embiotocide, the Lycodidw, Gadide, and marine Salmonide disappear either entirely, or retire from the shores and surface into the depths of the ocean. With regard to variety of forms, as well as to number of individuals, this zone far surpasses either of the tem- perate zones; in this respect, the life in the sea is as that on the land. Coast fishes are not confined to the actual coast-line, but abound on the coral reefs, with which some parts of the Atlantic and Pacific are studded, and many of which are submerged below the water. The abundance of animal and vegetable life which flourishes on them renders them the favourite pasture-grounds for the endless variety of coral-fishes (Squamipinnes, Acronuride, Pomacentride, Julide, Plectognathi, etc.), and for the larger predatory kinds. The colours and grotesque forms of the Fishes of the Tropics have justly excited the admiration of the earliest observers. Scarlet, black, blue, pink, red, yellow, etc., are arranged in patterns of the most bizarre fashion, mingling in spots, lines, bands ; and reminding us of the words of Captain Cook when de- scribing the coral-reefs of Palmerston Island: “The glowing appearance of the Mollusks was still inferior to that of the multitude of fishes that glided gently alone, seemingly with the most perfect security. The colours of the different sorts were the most beautiful that can be imagined—the yellow, blue, red, black, etc., far exceeding anything that art can produce. Their various forms, also, contributed to increase the richness of this sub-marine grotto, which could not be surveyed without a pleasing transport.” Of Chondropterygians the Seylliidw, Pristis (Saw-tishes), Lhinobatide, and Trygonide attain to the greatest de- A 274 . FISHES velopment. Of Acanthopterygians Centropristis, Serranus, Plectropoma, Mesoprion, Priacanthus, Apogon, Pristipoma, Hemulon, Diagramma, Gerres, Scolopsis, Synagris, Coesio, Mullide, Lethrinus, Squamipinnes, Cirrhites, some genera of Scorpenide, Platycephalus, Scienide, Sphyrena, Carana Equula, Callionymus, Teuthis, Acanthurus, Naseus, are re- presented by numerous species; and the majority of these genera and families are limited to this zone. Of Pharyn- goenaths the Pomacentride, Julidina, and Scarina, are met with near every coral formation in a living condition. Of Gadoids, a singular minute form, Bregmaceros, is almost the only representative, the other forms belonging to deep water, and rarely ascending to the surface. Flat-fishes (Plewro- nectide) are common on sandy coasts, and the majority of the genera are peculiar to the Tropics. Of Physostomi only the Saurina, Clupeide, and Murenide are represented, the Clupeide being exceedingly numerous in individuals, whilst the Murenide live more isolated, but show a still greater variety of species. Lophobranchi and Sclerodermi are gene- rally distributed. Branchiostoma has been found on several coasts. Geographically it is convenient to describe the Coast fauna of the tropical Atlantic separately from that of the Indo- Pacific ocean. The differences between them, however, are far less numerous and important than between the freshwater or terrestrial faunze of continental regions. The majority of the principal types are found in both, many of the species being even identical ; but the species are far more abundant in the Indo-Pacific than in the Atlantic, owing to the greater extent of the archipelagoes in the former. But for the broken and varied character of the coasts of the West Indies, the shores of the tropical Atlantic would, by their general uniformity, afford but a limited variety of conditions to the development of specific and generic forms, whilst the deep inlets of the EQUATORIAL ZONE. VM 6) Indian ocean, with the varying configuration of their coasts, and the different nature of their bottom, its long peninsulas, and its archipelagoes, and the scattered islands of the tropical Pacific, render this part of the globe the most perfect for the development of fish-life. The fishes of the Indian and Pacific oceans (between the Tropics) are almost identical, and the number of species ranging from the Red Sea and east coast of Africa to Polynesia, even to its westernmost islands, is very great indeed. However, this Indo-Pacific fauna does not reach the Pacific coast of South America. The wide space devoid of islands, east of the Sandwich Islands and the Marquesas group, together with the current of cold water which sweeps northwards along the South American coast, has proved to be a very effectual barrier to the eastward exten- sion of the Indo-Pacific fauna of coast fishes; and, conse- quently, we find an assemblage of fishes on the American coast and at the Galapagoes Islands, sufficiently distinct to constitute a distinct zoological division. The following list, which contains only the principal genera and groups of coast fishes, will give an idea of the affinity of the tropical Atlantic and Indo-Pacific :-—" Trop. -Atl. Indo-Pac. Scylliide . ; : —— 13 Pristis F : : 3 4 hinobatide 4 8 Torpedinide L : 1 8 Trygomde . : : 14 24 Etelis 1 1 Aprion : ; — 1 Apsilus . ; : 1 cee Centropristis oa : 15 — Anthias . : : 4 5 Serranus . ‘ : 30 85 Plectropoma ‘ : 11 5 1 The genera peculiar to the Equatorial zone are printed in italics. 276 FISHES. Grammistes Rhypticus . Diploprion . Myriodon . Mesoprion . Priacanthus Apogon and Chilodipterus Pristipoma . Hemulon . Diagramma Gerres Scolopsis . : Dentex and Symphorus Synagris and Pentapus Cesio Mullidee Sargus Lethrinus . Chrysophrys Pimelepterus Squamipinnes Toxotes Cirrhites Scorpzenidee Myripristis Holocentrum Platycephalus Prionotus . Trigla Peristethus Uranoscopina Champsodon Percis Sillago Latilus Opisthognathus Pseudochromis Cichlops and Pseudoplesiops Trop.-Atl. Indo-Pac. bo bo OU 1 _ poownwpaqor=ooa -» EQUATORIAL ZONE, Scienide Sphyrena . Trichiuride Caranz Chorinemus Trachynotus Psettus Platax Zanclus Equula and Gazza . Teuthis Acanthurus Naseus Kurtide Gobiodon Callionymus Batrachide Tetrabrachium Malthe Petroscirtes Clinus Dactyloscopus Malacanthus Cepola Gobiesocidee Amphisile . Fistulariidee Pomacentride Lachnoleemus Julidina Pseudodax Scarina Pseudophycis Bregmaceros Ophidide . Fierasfer Pleuronectide Saurima Trop. Atl. 44 1 6 20 Ind.-Pac. 43 10 277 278 FISHES. Trop.-Atl. Ind.-Pac. Clupeide . : : 33 84 Chirocentrus : : — 1 Murenidee : : AT 130 Pegasus. : : — 3 Solenostoma , , — 2 Syngnathide : 2 i 4] Scleroderma : : 16 67 Gymnodontes ; 23 40 A. Shore Fishes of the Tropical Atlantic. The boundaries of the tropical Atlantic extend zoologi- cally a few degrees beyond the Northern and Southern Tropics, but as the mixture with the types of the temperate zone is very gradual, no distinct boundary line can be drawn between the tropical and temperate faune. Types, almost exclusively limited to it, and not found in the Indo-Pacific, are few in nmmber, as Centropristis, Rhyp- ticus, Homulon, Malthe. A few others preponderate with regard to the number of species, as Plectropoma, Sargus, Trachynotus, Batrachide, and Gobiesocidw. The Scixnoids are equally represented in both oceans. All the remainder are found in both; but in the minority in the Atlantic, where they are sometimes represented by one or two species only (for instance, Lethrinus). B. Shore Fishes of the Tropical Indo-Pacifie Ocean. The ichthyological boundaries of this part of the tropical zone may be approximately given as 30° of lat. N. and S.; on the Australian coasts it should probably be placed still farther south, viz., to 34°; it includes, as mentioned above, the Sandwich Islands, and all the islands of the South Sea, but not the American coasts. Some eighty genera of Shore fishes are peculiar to the Indo-Pacific, but the majority consists of one or a few species EQUATORIAL ZONE. 279 only; comparatively few have a plurality of species, as Diagramma, Lethrinus, Equula, Teuthis, Amphiprion, Das- cyllus, Choerops, Chilinus, Anampses, Stethojulis, Coris, Coilia. The Sea-perches, large and small, which feed on Crusta- ceans and other small fishes, and the coral-feeding Pharyn- gogenaths are the types which show the greatest generic and specific variety in the Indo-Pacific. Then follow the Squamipinnes and Murewnide, the Clupeide and Carangide families in which the variety is more that of species than of genus. The Scorpenide, Pleuronectide, Acronuride, Scienide, Syngnathide, and Teuthyes, are those which contribute the next largest contingents. Of shore-loving Chondropterygians the Scylliide and Trygonide only are represented in moderate numbers, though they are more numerous in this ocean than in any other. C. Shore Fishes of the Pacific Coasts of Tropical America. As boundaries within which this fauna is comprised, may be indicated 30° Jat. N. and S., as in the Indo - Pacific. Its distinction from the Indo-Pacific les in the almost entire absence of coral-feeding fishes. There are scarcely any Squamipinnes, Pharyngognaths or Acronuride, and the Teuthyes are entirely absent. The genera that remain are such as are found in the tropical zone generally, but the species are entirely different from those of the Indo-Pacific. They are mixed with a sprinkling of peculiar genera, consist- ing of one or two species, like Discopyge, Hoplopagrus, Doy- dixodon, but they are too few in number to give a strikingly peculiar character to this fauna. Three districts are distinguishable -— a. The Central American district, in which we include, for the present, Lower California, shows so near an affinity to the tropical Atlantic that, if it were not separated from it by the 280 FISHES. neck of land uniting the two American Continents, it would most assuredly be regarded as a portion of the Fauna of the tropical Atlantic. With scarcely any exceptions the genera are identical, and of the species found on the Pacific side nearly one-half have proved to be the same as those of. the Atlantic. The explanation of this fact has been found in the existence of communications between the two oceans by channels and straits which must have been open till within a recent period. The isthmus of Central America was then partially submerged, and appeared as a chain of islands simi- lar to that of the Antilles; but as the reef-building corals flourished chiefly north and east of those islands, and were absent south and west of them, reef-fishes were excluded from the Pacific shores when the communications were destroyed by the upheaval of the land. b. The Galapagoes district received its coast fauna princi- pally from the Central American district, a part of the species being absolutely the same as on the coast of the Isthmus of Panama, or as in the West Indies. Yet the isolation of this eroup has continued a sufficiently long period to allow of the development of a number of distinct species of either pecu- harly Atlantic genera (such as Centropristis, Rhypticus, Gobiesox, Prionotus), or at least tropical genera (such as Chrysophrys, Pristipoma, Holacanthus, Caranx, Balistes). A few other types from the Peruvian coast (Doydixodon), or even from Japan (Prionwrus), have established themselves in this group of islands. A species of Cestracion has also reached the Galapagoes, but whether from the south, north, or west, cannot be determined. The presence of the Atlantic fauna on the Pacific side is felt still farther west than the Galapagoes, some Atlantic species having reached the Sandwich Islands, as Chetodon humeralis and Blennius brevipinnis. ce. The Peruvian district possesses a very limited variety SOUTHERN TEMPERATE ZONE. 281 of shore fishes, which belong, with few exceptions, like Inscopyge, Hoplognathus, Doydixzodon, to genera distributed throughout the tropical zone, or even beyond it. But the species, so far as they are known at present, are distinct from those of the Indo-Pacific, as well as of the tropical Atlantic ; and therefore this district cannot be joined either to the Central American or the Galapagoes. IV.—THE SOUTHERN TEMPERATE ZONE. This zone includes the coasts of the southern extremity of Africa, from about 30° lat. S., of the south of Australia with Tasmania, of New Zealand, and the Pacific and Atlantic coasts of South America between 30° and 50° lat. 8. The most striking character of this fauna is the reappear- ance of types inhabiting the corresponding latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, and not found in the intervening tropi- cal zone. This interruption of the contimuity in the geo- eraphical distribution of Shore-fishes is exemplified by species as well as genera, for instance—Chimera monstrosa, Galeus canis, Acanthias vulgaris, Acanthias blainvillit, Rhina squatina, Zeus faber, Lophius piscatorius, Centriscus scolopax, Engraulis encrasicholus, Clupea sprattus, Conger vulgaris. Instances of genera are still more numerous—Cestracion, Spinax, Pristio- phorus, Raja; Callanthias, Polyprion, Histiopterus, Cantharus, Lox, Girella, Pagellus, Chilodactylus, Sebastes, -Aploactis, Agonus, Lepidopus, Cyttus, Psychrolutide, Notacanthus ; Lycodes, Merluccius, Lotella, Phycis, Motella ; Aulopus ; Uro- campus, Solenognathus ; Myxine. Naturally, where the coasts of the tropical zone are con- tinuous with those of the temperate, a number of tropical genera enter the latter, and genera which we have found between the tropics as well as in the temperate zone of the Northern Hemisphere, extend in a similar manner towards the 28 bo FISHES. south. But the truly tropical forms are absent; there are no Squamipinnes, scarcely any Mullide,no Acronuri, no Teuthyes, no Pomacentride (with a single exception on the coast of Chili), only one genus of Julidina, no Scarina, which are re- placed by another group of Pharyngognaths, the Odacina. The Labrina, so characteristic of the temperate zone of the Northern Hemisphere, reappear in a distinct genus (Malaco- pterus) on the coast of Juan Fernandez. The family of Berycide, equally interesting with regard to their distribution in time and in space, consists of temperate and tropical genera. The genus by which this family is represented in the southern temperate zone (7'rachichthys) 1s much more nearly allied to the northern than to the tropical genera, The true Cottina and Heterolepidina (forms with a bony stay of the preeoperculum, which is generally armed) have not crossed the tropical zone; they are replaced by fishes ex- tremely similar in general form, and having the same habits, but lacking that osteological peculiarity. Their southern analogues belong chiefly to the family 7rachinide, and are types of genera peculiar to the Southern Hemisphere. The Discoboli of the Northern Hemisphere have likewise not penetrated to the south, where they are represented by Gobiesocide. These two families replace each other in their distribution over the globe. Nearly all the Plewronectide (but they are not numerous) belong to distinct genera, some, however, being remarkably similar in general form to the northern Pleuronectes. With Gadoids Myxinide reappear, one species being ex- tremely similar to the European Myxine. Adellostoma is a genus peculiar to the southern temperate zone. As in the northern temperate zone, so in the southern, the number of individuals and the variety of forms is much less than between the tropics. This is especially apparent SOUTHERN TEMPERATE ZONE. 283 on comparing the numbers of species constituting a genus. In this zone genera composed of more than ten species are the exception, the majority having only from one to five. The proportion of genera limited to this zone is rather high; they will be indicated under the several districts, which we distinguish on geographical rather than zoological grounds. 1. The Cape of Good Hope district. The principal genera found in this district are the follow- ing (those limited to the entire zone being marked with a single (*) and those peculiar to this district with a double (**) asterisk) :— Chimera, *Callorhynchus, Galeus, ** Leptocarcharias, Scyl- lium, Acanthias, Rhinobatus, Torpedo, Narcine, Astrape, Raja. Serranus, Dentex, Pristipoma ; Cantharus, Box,** Dipterodon, Sagrus, Pagrus, Pagellus, Chrysophrys ; * Chilodactylus ; Sebastes, *Agriopus ; Trigla ; Sphyrena ; Lepidopus, Thyrsites ; Zeus ; Caranx ; Lophius ; Clinus (10 species), Cristiceps ; ** Choriso- chismus. ** Halidesmus, *Genypterus, Motella. Syngnathus.—* Bdellostoma. This list contains many northern forms, which in conjunc- tion with the peculiarly southern types (Callorhynchus, Chilo- dactylus, Agriopus, Clinus, Genypterus, Bdellostoma) leave no doubt that this district belongs to the southern temperate zone, Whilst the Freshwater fishes of South Africa are mem- bers of the tropical fauna. Only a few (Rhinobatus, Nar- cine, Astrape, and Sphyrena) have entered from the neigh- bouring tropical coasts. The development of Sparoids is greater than in any of the other districts of this zone, and may be regarded as one of its distinguishing features. 2. The South Australian district comprises the southern coasts of Australia (northwards, about to the latitude of 284 FISHES. Sydney), Tasmania, and New Zealand. It is the richest in the southern temperate zone, partly im consequence of a considerable influx of tropical forms on the eastern coast of Australia, where they penetrate farther southwards than should have been expected from merely geographical con- siderations; partly in consequence of the thorough manner in which the ichthyology of New South Wales and New Zealand has been explored. On the other hand, the western half of the south coast of Australia is still almost a terra incognita. The shore-fishes of New Zealand are not so distinct from those of south-eastern Australia as to deserve to be placed in a separate district. Beside the genera which enter this zone from the Tropics, and which are more numerous on the Australian coast than on that of New Zealand, and beside a few very local genera, the remainder are identical. Many of the South Australian species, besides, are found also on the coasts of New Zealand. The principal points of difference are the extraordinary development of Monacanthus on the coast of South Australia, and the apparently total absence in Australia of Gadoids, which in the New Zealand Fauna are represented by six genera. Shore-fishes of the South Australian district. South Australia and Tasmania. *Callorhynchus (antarcticus) . 1 1 Galeus (canis) 1 Scyllium **Parascyllium Crossorhinus Cestracion . Mustelus (antarcticus) Acanthias (vulgaris and blainvillii) Rhina Pristiophorus New Zealand. pe Te Sy Te) ST Le ser t— SOUTHERN TEMPERATE ZONE. 285 South Australia and Tasmania. New Zealand. **Trygonorhina (fasciata) Rhinobatus Torpedo Narcine Raja Trygon unglenbicy, ** Enoplosus Anthias (Gomrdeon Callanthias Serranus Plectropoma **Lanioperca . ** Arripis Histiopterus Erythrichthys *Haplodactylus Girella **Tephrxops . Pagrus *Scorpis ** A typichthys **Trachichthys ** Chironemus **Holoxenus . Chilodactylus ** Nemadactylus **Latris Scorpzena **Glyptauchen Centropogon * A griopus * A ploactis **Pentaroge Platycephalus Lepidotrigla Trigla _ tears Se See re ee | Ee eg eee me ore > ES en | HS 1 Number of species uncertain. 86 FISHES. ** Anema **Crapatalus . **K athetostoma **Leptoscopus Percis * Aphritis Sillago *Bovichthys . *Notothenia . Sphyrena Lepidopus Trichiurus Thyrsites **Platystethus Zeus (faber) Cyttus ; Trachurus (trachurus) Caranx *Seriolella Pempheris . Callionymus Batrachus **Brachionichthys **Saccarius Clinus **Lepidoblennius Cristiceps and Tripterygium ** Patzecus ** A canthoclinus **Diplocrepis . **Crepidogaster **Tyrachelochismus **N eophrynichthys Centriscus Notacanthus (esau **Tabrichthys **Odax South Australia New Zealand. and Tasmania. oo leet aa eal eon set =r OnE, ogres gt bare Mee A ne recto we eel (ah oes a eee [havea pepe eke een a || Spee | eae Camere ate a | eal ee SOUTHERN TEMPERATE ZONE, 287 South Australia j New Zealand. and Tasmania. ** Coridodax = **Olistherops . : 1 ** Siphonognathus if Gadus wet Merluccius . ‘ : — Lotella : : ; — ** Pseudophycis : — Motella Bregmaceros *Genypterus . ** Lophonectes **Brachypleura Pseudorhombus ** A mmotretis ** Rhombosolea ** Peltorhamphus Solea : Aulopus. ; Gonorhyncbus (grey1) Engraulis (encrasicholus) Clupea **Chilobranchus Conger (vulgaris) Ophichthys Murenichthys Congromurena Syngnathus Ichthyocampus ** Nannocampus Urocampus **Stigmatophora Solenognathus ** Phyllopteryx Monacanthus Ostracion *Bdellostoma Branchiostoma : ; i — oo Ov KS bt bt ee 288 FISHES. 3. The coast-line of the Chilian district extends over 20 degrees of latitude only, and is nearly straight. In its nor- thern and warmer parts it is of a very uniform character, and exposed to high and irregular tides, and to remarkable and sudden changes of the levels of land and water, which must seriously interfere with fishes living and propagating near the shore. No river of considerable size interrupts the monotony of the physical conditions, to offer an addi- tional element in favour of the development of littoral animals. In the southern parts, where the coast is lined with archipelagoes, the climate is too severe for the majority of fishes. All these conditions combine to render this district comparatively poor as regards variety of Shore fishes, as will be seen from the following lst :— *Callorhynchus ; Scyllium, Acanthias, Spinax; Urolo- phus. Serranus, Plectropoma, Polyprion, Pristipoma, Erythrich- thys; *Haplodactylus; *Scorpis; Chilodactylus, **Mendo- soma; Sebastes, *Agriopus; Trigla, Agonus; *Aphritis, *Eleginus, Pinguipes, Latilus, Notothenia (1 sp.) Umbrina ; Thyrsites; Trachurus, Caranx, *Seriolella ; Porichthys ; **Myx- odes, Clinus; Sicyases, Gobiesox. Heliastes ; **Malacopterus ; *Labrichthys. Merluccius ; *Genypterus ; Pseudorhombus. Engraulis, Clupea; Ophichthys, Mureena. Synenathus.—* Bdellostoma. Of these genera six only are not found in other districts of this zone. Three are peculiar to the Chilian district ; Porichthys and Agonus have penetrated so far southwards from the Peruvian and Californian districts; and Polyprion is one of those extraordinary instances in which a very speci- alised form occurs at almost opposite points of the globe, without having left a trace of its previous existence in, or of its passage through, the intermediate space. ANTARCTIC SHORE FISHES. 289 4, The Patagonian district is, with the exception of the neighbourhood of the mouth of the Rio de la Plata, almost unknown. In that estuary occur Mustelus vulgaris, two Raja, two Trygon, several Scienoids, Paropsis signata and Percophis brasilianus (two fishes pecuhar to this coast), Prionotus punc- tatus, Lemonema longifilis (a Gadoid), a Pseudorhombus, two Soles, Engraulis olidus, a Syngnathus, Conger vulgaris, and Ophichthys ocellatus ; and if we notice the occurrence of a Serranus and Caranz, of Aphritis and Pinguipes, and of two or three Clupea, we shall have enumerated all that is known of this fauna. The fishes of the southern part, viz. the coast of Patagonia proper, southwards to Magelhzn’s Straits, are unknown; which is the more to be regretted, as it is most probably the part in which the characteristic types of this district are most developed. V.—SHORE FISHES OF THE ANTARCTIC OCEAN. To this fauna we refer the shore fishes of the southern- most extremity of South America, from 50° lat. S., with Terra del Fuego and the Falkland Islands, and those of Ker- guelen’s Land, with Prince Edward’s Island. No fishes are known from the other oceanic islands of these latitudes. In the Southern Hemisphere surface fishes do not extend so far towards the Pole as in the Northern; none are known from beyond 60° lat. S., and the Antarctic Fauna, which is analogous to the Arctic Fauna, inhabits coasts more than ten degrees nearer to the equator. It is very probable that the shores between 60° and the Antarctic circle are inhabited by fishes sufficiently numerous to supply part of the means of subsistence for the large Seals which pass there at least some season of the year, but hitherto none have been ob- tained by naturalists; all that the present state of our know- ledge justifies us in saying is, that the general character of U 290 FISHES. the Fauna of Magelheen’s Straits and Kerguelen’s Land is extremely similar to that of Iceland and Greenland. As in the arctic Fauna, Chondropterygians are scarce, and represented by Acanthias vulgaris and species of Raja. Holocephali have not yet been found so far south, but Cadlor- hynchus, which is not uncommon near the northern boundary of this fauna, will prove to extend into it. As to Acanthopterygians, Cataphractt and Scorpenida are represented as in the arctic Fauna, two of the genera (Sebastes and Agonus) being identical. The Cottide are re- placed by six genera of Tvrachinide, remarkably similar in form to arctic types; but Discoboli and the characteristic Arctic Blennioids are absent. Gadoid Fishes reappear, but are less developed; as usual they are accompanied by Myxine. The reappearance of so specialised a genus as Lycodes is most remarkable. Flat- fishes are scarce as in the North, and belong to peculiar genera. Physostomes are probably not entirely absent, but hitherto none have been met with so far south. Lophobranchs are scarce, as in the Arctic zone; however, it is noteworthy that a peculiar genus, with persistent embryonic characters (Proto- campus), is rather common on the shores of the Falkland Islands. The following are the genera known from this zone. Those with a single asterisk (*) are known to extend into the Temperate zone, but not beyond it; those with a double asterisk (**) are limited to the Antarctic shores :— Magelhzen’s and 2 ae Kerguelen. Falkland. Acanthias vulgaris . : 1 a Raja 1 2 Psammobatis : : 1 — Sebastes. 1 — **Zanclorhynchus _. — 1 ANTARCTIC SHORE FISHES. 291 Magelhen’s and Falkland. *Agriopus . ; : 1 Agonus if * A phritis 1 *Eleginus 1 ** Cheenichthys 1 *Bovichthys . 2 *Notothenia . 8 **Harpagifer . 1 Lycodes. : : 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 if Kerguelen. ** Magnea Lotella Merluccius . **Lepidopsetta **Thysanopsetta Syngnathus **Protocampus Myxine ka ee se Fig. 108.—Cheenichthys rhinoceratus, shores of the Antarctic Ocean. CH AVP TE exe DISTRIBUTION OF PELAGIC FISHES. PELAGIC Fishes,—that is, fishes inhabiting the surface of mid- ocean (see p. 255), belong to various orders, viz. Chondrop- terygians, Acanthopterygians, Physostomes, Lophobranchs, and Plectognaths. But neither Anacanths nor Pharyngog- naths contribute to this series of the Marine Fauna, The following genera and families are included in it :— CHONDROPTERYGI: Carcharias, Galeocerdo, Thalassorhinus, Zygena, Trienodon, Lamnidee, Rhinodon, Notidanidee, Leemar- gus, Euprotomicrus, Echinorhinus, Isistius ; Myliobatide. ACANTHOPTERYGH : Dactylopterus, Micropteryx, Scom- brina, Gastrochisma, Nomeus, Centrolophus, Coryphzenina, Seriola, Temnodon, Naucrates, Psenes, Xiphide, Antennarius. PHYSOSTOMI: Sternoptychidee, Scopelus, coasts of this region, extending from the southern extremity of the African Continent to Japan. 328 FISHES. CrossorHinus.—The first dorsal behind the ventrals, the second in advance of the anal, which is very close to the caudal. Tail rather short. Eyes small. Spiracle a wide oblique slit, behind and below the eye. Nasal and buccal cavities confluent. Head broad, flat, with the snout very obtuse; mouth wide, nearly anterior. SN S Fig. 249.—Bregmaceros macclellandii. the Tropics. .B. macclellandii scarcely exceeds three inches in length, is not uncommon in the Indian Ocean, and has found its way to New Zealand; specimens have been picked up in mid-ocean. MURANOLEPIS.—Body covered with lanceolate epidermoid productions, intersecting each other at right angles like those of a Freshwater-eel. Vertical fins confluent, no caudal being dis- cernible ; an anterior dorsal fin is represented by a single fila- mentous ray ; ventral fins narrow, composed of several rays. A 2N 546 FISHES. barbel. Jaws with a band of villiform teeth ; palate tooth- less. One species (JZ. marmoratus) from Kerguelen’s Land. CHIASMODUS.—Body naked ; stomach and abdomen disten- sible. ‘Two dorsal fins and one anal; a separate caudal; ven- tral fins rather narrow, with several rays. Upper and lower jaws with two series of large pointed teeth, some of the anterior being very large and movable ; teeth on the palatine bones, but none on the vomer. Chin without barbel. This Gadoid (Ch. niger, Fig. 111, p, 311), inhabits great depths in the Atlantic (to 1500 fathoms). The specimen ficured was taken with a large Scopeloid in its stomach. Brosmius.—Body moderately elongate, covered with very small scales. A separate caudal, one dorsal, and one anal ; ven- trals narrow, composed of five rays. Vomerine and palatine teeth. A barbel. The “Torsk” (B. brosme) is confined to the northern parts of the temperate zone, and probably extends to the arctic circle. THIRD FAMILY—OPHIDIIDA, Body more or less elongate, naked, or scaly. Vertical fins generally wnited ; no separate anterior dorsal or anal ; dorsal oecupying the greater portion of the back. Ventral fins rudi- mentary or absent, jugular. Gull-openings wide, the gill-mem- branes not attached to the isthmus. Marine fishes (with the exception of ZLucifuga), partly littoral, partly bathybial. They may be divided into five groups. I. Ventral fins present, attached to the humeral arch: BROTULINA. BrotuLa.—Body elongate, covered with minute scales. Hye of moderate size, Hach ventral reduced to a single filament, sometimes bifid at its extremity. Teeth villiform; snout with barbels. One pyloric appendage. OPHIDIID®. 547 Five species of small size from the Tropical Atlantic and Indian Ocean. Lucifuga are Brotula organised for a subterranean life, The eye is absent, or quite rudimentary, and covered by the skin; the barbels of Brotula are replaced by numerous minute Fig. 250.—Lucifuga dentata, from caves in Cuba. ciliz or tubercles. They inhabit the subterranean waters of caves in Cuba, and never come to the light. BATHYNECTES.—Body produced into a long tapering tail, without caudal. Mouth very wide, villiform teeth in the jaws, on the vomer and palatine bones. Barbel none. Ventral fins reduced to simple or bifid filaments, placed close together, and near to the humeral symphysis. Gill-membranes not united ; gill-laminze remarkably short. Bones of the head soft and cavernous ; operculum with a very feeble spine above. Deep-sea fishes, inhabiting depths varying from 1000 to 2500 fathoms. Three species are known, the largest specimen obtained being seventeen inches long. ACANTHONUS.—Head large and thick, armed in front and on the opercles with strong spines ; trunk very short, the vent being below the pectoral; tail thin, strongly compressed, tapering, Fig. 251.—Acanthonus armatus. without caudal. Eye small. Mouth very wide; villiform teeth in the jaws, on the vomer and palatine bones. Barbel none. 548 FISHES. Ventrals reduced to simple filaments placed close together on the humeral symphysis. Scales extremely small. Bones of the head soft. Only two specimens, thirteen inches long, of this remark- able deep-sea form have been obtained, at a depth of 1075 fathoms, in the Indian Ocean. TypHLOoNUS.— Head large, compressed, with most of the bones in a cartilaginous condition ; the superficial bones with large muciferous cavities, not armed. Snout a thick protuberance projecting beyond the mouth, which is rather small and inferior. Trunk very short, the vent being below the pectoral ; tail thin, strongly compressed, tapering, without separate caudal. Eye externally not visible. Villiform teeth in the jaws, on the vomer and palatine bones. Barbel none. Scales thin, deciduous, small. Also of this deep-sea fish two specimens only are known, 10 inches long, from a depth of 2200 fathoms in the Western Pacific. APHYONUS.—Head, body, and tapering tail strongly com- pressed, enveloped in a thin, scaleless, loose skin. Vent far behind the pectoral. Snout swollen, projecting beyond the wide mouth. No teeth in the upper jaw, small ones in the lower. No externally visible eye. Barbel none. Head covered with a system of wide muciferous channels, the dermal bones being almost membranaceous, whilst the others are in a semi-cartila- ginous condition. Notochord persistent, but with a superficial indication of vertebral segments. Fig. 252,—Aphyonus gelatinosus. One specimen only of this most remarkable form is known; it is 54 inches long, and was obtained at a depth of 1400 fathoms south of New Guinea. OPHIDIID®. 549 Of the remaining genera belonging to this group, Brotu- lophis, Halidesmus, Dinematichthys, and Bythites are surface forms; Sirembo and Pteridiwm inhabit moderate depths ; Lhinonus is a deep-sea fish. Il. Ventral fins replaced by a pair of bifid filaments (barbels) inserted below the glosso-hyal : OPHIDIINA. OpHIDIUM.—Body elongate, compressed, covered with very small scales. Eye of moderate size. All the teeth small. Small fishes from the Atlantic and Pacific. Seven species are known, differing from one another in the structure of the air-bladder (see p. 145). . GENYPTERUS is a larger form of Ophidiwm, in which the outer series of teeth in the jaws and the single palatine series contains strong teeth. Three species from the Cape of Good Hope, South Australia, New Zealand, and Chili are known. They grow to a length of five feet, and have an excellent flesh, like cod, well adapted for curing. At the Cape they are known by the name of “ Klipvisch,” and in New Zealand as “ Ling” or “Cloudy Bay Cod.” Ill. No ventral fins whatever ; vent at the throat: FIERAS- FERINA. These fishes (Fierasfer and Encheliophis) are of very small size and eel-like in shape; the ten species known are found in the Mediterranean, Atlantic, and Indo-Pacific. As far as is known they live parasitically in cavities of other marine animals, accompany Medusz, and more especially penetrate into the respiratory cavities of Star-fishes and Holothurians. Not rarely they attempt other animals less suited for their habits, as, for instance, Bivalves; and cases are known in which they have been found imprisoned below the mantle of the Mollusk, or covered over with a layer of the pearly sub- stance secreted by it. They are perfectly harmless to their 550 FISHES. host, and merely seek for themselves a safe habitation, feeding on the animalcules which enter with the water the cavity inhabited by them. IV. No ventral fins whatever ; vent remote from the head ; gul-openings very wide, the gill-membranes not being united : AMMODYTINA. The “Sand-eels” or “Launces” (Ammodytes) are ex- tremely common on sandy shores of Europe and North America. They live in large shoals, rising as with one accord to the surface, or diving to the bottom, where they bury them- selves with incredible rapidity in the sand. They are much sought after for bait by fishermen, who discover their pre- sence on the surface by watching the action of Porpoises which feed on them. These Cetaceans, when they meet with a shoal, know how to keep it on the surface by diving below and swimming round it, thus destroying large numbers of them. The most common species on the British coast is the Lesser Sand-eel (A. tobianus); the Greater Sand-eel (A. lanceolatus), which attains to a leneth of eighteen inches; A. siculus, from the Mediterranean, scarcer in British seas. Two species live on the American coasts, A. americanus and A. dubius ; one in California, A. personatus. Bleekeria from Madras is the second genus of this group. V. No ventral fins whatever ; vent remote from the head ; Fig. 253.—Congrogadus subducens. gill-openings of moderate width, the gill-membranes being united below the throat, not attached to the isthmus: CONGROGADINA. Only two fishes belong to this group—Congrogadus from the Australian coasts, and Haliophis from the Red Sea. MACRURID&. 551 FourtH FAMILY—MACRURID&A. Body terminating in a long, compressed, tapering tail, Fig. 255.—Scale of Macrurus ecelorhynchus. Fig. 254.—Scale of Macrurus trachyrhynchus. WY a A HU i Mth HD iy Y, Yypy Fig. 256.—Scale from the lateral line of Macrurus australis. covered with spiny, keeled, or striated scales. One short ante- 552 FISHES. rior dorsal ; the second very long, continued to the end of the tail, and composed of very feeble rays ; anal of an extent similar to that of the second dorsal; no caudal. Ventral fins thoracic or jugular, composed of several rays. This family, known a few years ago from a limited number of examples, representing a few species only, proves to be one which is distributed over all oceans, occurring in considerable variety and great abundance at depths of from 120 to 2600 fathoms. They are, in fact, Deep-sea Gadoids, much resemb- lng each other in the general shape of their body, but differ- ing in the form of the snout and in the structure of their scales. About forty species are known, of which many attain a length of three feet. They have been referred to the fol- lowing genera :— Fig. 257.—-Macrurus australis. Macrurus.—Scales of moderate size; snout produced, conical ; mouth inferior. CoRYPHANOIDES.—Scales of moderate size; snout obtuse, obliquely truncated ; cleft of the mouth lateral. MAcruRONUS.—NSeales of moderate size, spiny ; snout pointed ; mouth anterior ands lateral, with the lower jaw projecting. MALACOCEPHALUS.—NSeales very small, ctenoid ; snout short, obtuse, obliquely truncated, BatuyGapus.—Scales small, cycloid ; snout not projecting beyond the mouth ; mouth wide, anterior, and lateral. FLAT-FISHES, 553 Ateleopus from Japan and Xenocephalus from New Ire- land are genera belonging to the Gadoid Anacanths, but are very imperfectly known. SECOND DIVISION—ANACANTHINI PLEURONECTOIDEI. Head and part of the body unsymmetrically formed. This division consists of one family only : PLEURONECTIDA. The fishes of this family are called “ Flat-fishes,” from their strongly compressed, high, and flat body; in consequence of the absence of an air-bladder, and of the structure of their paired fins, they are unable to maintain their body in a vertical posi- tion, resting and moving on one side of the body only. The side turned towards the bottom is sometimes the left, sometimes the right, colourless, and termed the “blind” side; that turned upwards and towards the light is variously, and in some tropical species even vividly, coloured. Both eyes are on the coloured side, on which side also the muscles are more stronely developed. The dorsal and anal fins are exceedingly long, without division. All the Flat-fishes undergo remark- able changes with age, which, however, are very imperfectly known and not yet fully understood, from the difficulty of referring larval forms to their respective parents. The larve are, singularly enough, much more frequently met in the open ocean than near the coast; they are transparent, like Lepto- cephalt ; perfectly symmetrical, with an eye on each side of the head, and swim in a vertical position like other fishes. The manner in which one eye is transferred from the blind to the coloured side is subject to discussion. Whilst some naturalists believe that the eye turning round its axis pushes its way through the yielding bones from the blind to the 054 FISHES. upper side, others hold that, as soon as the body of the fish commences to rest on one side only, the eye of that side, in its tendency to turn towards the light, carries the surround- ing parts of the head with it; in fact, the whole of the fore- part of the head is twisted towards the coloured side, which is a process of but little difficulty as lone as the framework of the head is still cartilaginous. Flat-fishes when adult live always on the bottom, and swim with an undulating motion of their body. Sometimes they rise to the surface; they prefer sandy bottom, and do not descend to any considerable depth. They occur in all seas, except in the highest latitudes and on rocky, precipi- tous coasts, becoming most numerous towards the equator ; those of the largest size occur in the temperate zone. Some enter fresh water freely, and others have become entirely acclimatised in ponds and rivers. All are carnivorous. Flat-fishes were not abundant in the tertiary epoch; the only representative known is a species of Rhombus from Monte Bolca. The size and abundance of Flat-fishes, and the flavour of the flesh of the majority of the species, render this family one of the most useful to man; and especially on the coasts of the northern temperate zone, their capture is one of the most important sources of profit to the fishermen. PseTTopEs.—Mouth very wide, the maxillary being more than one-half of that of the head. Each jaw armed with two series of long, slender, curved, distant teeth, the front teeth of the inner series of the lower jaw being the longest, and received in a groove before the vomer; vomerine and palatine teeth. The dorsal fin commences on the nape of the neck. This genus fitly heads the list of Flat-fishes, having retained more of symmetrical structure than the other mem- bers of the family, and, therefore, their eyes are as often found on the right as on the left side. It seems to swim, not un- FLAT-FISHES. 555 frequently, in a vertical position. Only one species is known, Ps. erumet, common in the Indian Ocean. HrppoGLossus.—Eyes on the right side; mouth wide, the length of the maxillary being one-third of that of the head. Teeth in the upper jaw in a double series; the anterior of the upper jaw and the lateral of the lower strong. The dorsal fin commences above the eye. The “ Holibut” (4. vulgaris) is the largest of all Flat- fishes, attaining to a length of five and six feet, and a weight of several hundredweights. It is found along the northern coasts of Europe, on the coasts of Kamtschatka and Cali- fornia, particularly frequenting banks situated at some distance from the coast, and at a depth of 50 to 120 fathoms. Other genera, with nearly symmetrical mouth, in which the dorsal fin commences above the eye, are Hippoglossoides (the “Rough Dab”) and Zephritis. RuHomMBuUS.—Hyes on the left side. Mouth wide, the length of the maxillary being more than one-third of that of the head. Each jaw with a band of villiform teeth, without canines ; vomerine teeth, none on the palatines, The dorsal fin. com- mences on the snout. Scales none or small. Seven species from the North Atlantic and Mediterranean, of which the most noteworthy are the “ Turbot,’ RA. maximus, one of the most valued food-fishes, and growing to a length of three feet; the “Turbot of the Black Sea,” Rh. meoticus, the body of which is covered with bony, conical tubercles, which are as large as the eye; the “ Brill,” Ah. levis, repre- sented on the North American coasts by Lh. aquosus ; the “Whiff,” or “ Mary-sole,” or “Sail-fluke,” Rh. megastoma ; “Bloch’s Top-knot,” Lh. punctatus (described by Yarrell as Lh. hirtus, and often confounded with the following species). PHRYNORHOMBUS, differing from Lhombus in lacking vomer- ine teeth. The scales are very small and spiny. The “Top-knot” (Ph. wnimaculatus) occurs occasionally 556 FISHES. on the south coast of England, and is more common in the Mediterranean ; it is a small species. ARNOGLOSSUS.— Mouth wide, the length of the maxillary being more or not much less than one-third of that of the head. Teeth minute, in a single series in both jaws; vomerine or palatine teeth none. The dorsal fin commences on the snout. Scales of moderate size, deciduous ; lateral line with a strong curve above the pectoral, Eyes on the left side. Seven species from European and Indian Seas. The “Scald-fish” (A. laterna) is common in the Mediterranean, and extends to the south coast of England; it is a small species. PSEUDORHOMBUS.—Mouth wide, the length of the maxillary being more than one-third of that of the head. Teeth in both jaws in a single series, of unequal size ; vomerine or palatine teeth none. ‘The dorsal fin commences on the snout. Scales small ; lateral line with a strong curve anteriorly. Eyes on the left side. Interorbital space not concave. A tropical genus with a few outlying species, represented chiefly in the Indo-Pacific, and also in the Atlantic. Seven- teen species. VHOMBOIDICHTHYS. — Mouth of moderate width or small. Teeth minute, in a single or double series ; vomerine or palatine teeth none. Eyes separated by a concave more or less broad space. The dorsal fin commences on the snout. Seales ciliated ; lateral line with a strong curve anteriorly, Eyes on the left side. A tropical genus, but also represented in the Mediterranean and on the coast of Japan. Sixteen species, the majority of which are prettily coloured and ornamented with ocellated spots; in some species the adult males have some of the fin- rays prolonged into filaments. Other genera with nearly symmetrical mouth, in which the dorsal fin commences before the eye, on the snout, are Citharus, Anticitharus, Brachyplewra, Samarts, Psettichthys, Citharichthys, Hemirhombus, Paralichthys, Liopsetta, Lopho- nectes, Lepidopsetta, and Thysanopsetta. FLAT-FISHES. 557 PLEURONECTES.—Cleft of the mouth narrow, with the denti- tion much more developed on the blind side than on the coloured. Teeth in a single or in a double series, of moderate size ; palatine and vomerine teeth none. The dorsal fin commences above the eye. Scales very small or entirely absent. Eyes generally on the right side. This genus is characteristic of the littoral fauna of the northern temperate zone, a few species ranging to the Arctic circle. ‘Twenty-three species are known, of which the fol- lowing are the most noteworthy: P. platessa, the “ Plaice,” ranging from the coast of France to Iceland; P. glacialis, from the Arctic coasts of North America; P. americanus, the transatlantic representative of the Plaice; P. limanda, the common “Dab;” P. microcephalus, the “Smear-dab;” P. cynoglossus, the “ Craig-fluke ;” P. flesus, the “ Flounder.” RHOMBOSOLEA.—Eyes on the right side, the lower in advance of the upper. Mouth narrower on the right side than on the left ; teeth on the blind side only, villiform; palatine and vomerine teeth none. The dorsal fin commences on the fore- most part of the snout. Only one ventral which is continuous with the anal. Scales very small, cycloid ; lateral line straight. This genus represents Plewronectes in the Southern Hemi- sphere, but consists of three species only, which occur on the coasts of New Zealand, and are valued as food-fishes. Other genera, with narrow unsymmetrical mouth, in which the upper eye is not in advance of the lower, and which have pectoral fins, are Parophrys, Psammodiscus, Ammotretis, Pel- torhamphus, Nematops, Leops, and Poecilopsetta. SoLeA.—Eyes on the right side, the upper being more or less in advance of the lower. Cleft of the mouth narrow, twisted round to the left side. Villiform teeth on the blind side only ; vomerine or palatine teeth none. The dorsal fin commences on the snout, and is not confluent with the caudal. Scales very small, ctenoid ; lateral line straight. “Soles” are numerously represented in all suitable locali- 558 FISHES, ties within the temperate and tropical zones, with the excep- tion of the southern parts of the southern temperate zone, in which they are absent. Some enter or live in fresh water. Nearly forty species are known. British are S. vulgaris, the common “Sole;” S. awrantiaca, the “Lemon-sole,” which is rather a southern species, and inhabits, on the south coast of England, deeper water than the common Sole; S. variegata, the “ Banded Sole,” with very small pectoral fins; and 8S. minuta, the “ Dwarf-Sole.’—Allied to Solea are Pardachirus and Liachirus from the Indian coasts. SyNAPTuRA.—Eyes on the right side, the upper in advance of the lower. Cleft of the mouth narrow, twisted round to the left side ; minute teeth on the left side only. Vertical fins confluent. Scales small, ctenoid ; lateral line straight. Twenty species; with the exception of two from the Mediterranean and coast of Portugal, all belong to the fauna of the Indian Ocean.—Closely allied is Aesopia. GYMNACHIRUS.—Mouth very small, toothless. Scales none, lateral line straight. Eyes on the right side. The dorsal fin commences on the snout ; caudal free. Pectorals rudimentary or entirely absent. Two species from the Tropical Atlantic. CyNoGLossus.—Kyes on the left side; pectorals none ; ver- tical fins confluent. Scales ctenoid ; lateral line on the left side double or triple ; upper part of the snout produced back- wards into a hook; mouth unsymmetrical, rather narrow. Teeth minute, on the right side only. Abundant in the Indian seas, and especially on the flat sandy shores of China. About thirty-five species are known, which rarely exceed a length of eighteen inches. They are easily recognised by their long narrow shape (which has been compared to a dog’s tongue) and the peculiar form of their snout. To complete the list of Pleuronectoid genera, the following CAT-FISHES, 5d9 have to be mentioned: Soleotalpa and Apionichthys, Soles with rudimentary eyes; -Ammopleurops, Aphoristia, and Plagusia, which are closely allied to Cynoglossus, the latter genus having the lips provided with tentacles. FOURTH ORDER—PHYSOSTOMI. All the fin-rays articulated, only the first of the dorsal and pectoral fins ws sometimes ossified. Ventral fins, if present, abdominal, without spine. Atr-bladder, of present, with a pneu- matic duct (except in Scombresocide). First FAMILY—SILURIDA, Skin naked or with osseous scutes, but without scales. Larbels always present ; maxillary bone rudimentary, almost always forming a support to a maxillary barbel. Margin of the upper jaw formed by the intermaxillaries only. Suboper- culum absent. Air-bladder generally present, communicating with the organ of hearing by means of the auditory ossicles, Adipose fin present or absent. A large family, represented by numerous genera, which exhibit a great variety of form and structure of the fins; they inhabit the fresh waters of all the temperate and tropical regions ; a few enter the sea but keep near the coast. The first appearance of Siluroids is indicated by some fossil remains in tertiary deposits of the highlands of Padang in Sumatra, where Pseudeutropius and Bagarius, types well represented in the living Indian fauna, have been found. Also in North America spines referable to Cat-fishes have been found in tertiary formations. The skeleton of the typical Siluroids shows many peculia- rities, The cranial cavity is not membranous on the sides, 560 FISHES. but closed as in the Cyprinids, by the orbitosphenoids and the ethmoid that unite with the pre-frontals, carrying forward the cranial cavity to the nasal bone, without leaving a mem- branous septum between the orbits. But the supraoccipital is greatly developed, and in many the post-temporal is united by suture to the sides of the cranium. In numerous members of the family the skull is enlarged posteriorly, by dermal ossifications, to form a kind of helmet which spreads over the nape; the lateral angles of this production are formed by the suprascapule, augmented and fixed by suture, and the median part is the extension of the supraoccipital, which is generally very large, is connected anteriorly with the frontal, and pass- ing backwards between the post-frontals, the parietals, the mastoids, and the suprascapulee, goes past them all on to the nape. The mastoids interpose between the post-frontals and the parietals, so as to come in contact with the supraoccipital, and the parietals but little developed are pressed to the back part of the cranium, and in some instances wholly disappear. The suprascapula most frequently unites to the mastoid by an immovable suture, which includes the parietal when that bone is present, and extends even to the supraoccipital. It gives out besides two processes, one of them resting on the exoccipital and basioccipital, or wedging itself between them, and the other going to the first vertebra; sometimes a plate from the exoccipital supports the same vertebra. This verte- bra, though it presents a pretty continuous centrum beneath, is in reality composed of three or four coalescent vertebrae, as we ascertain by its diapophyses, by the circular elevations of the neural canal, and by the holes for the exit of the pairs of spinal nerves. There is great variety in the development of the various processes of the bones we have mentioned, and there is no less in the magnitude and connections of the first three interneurals. In general in the species which have a strong dorsal ee ee CAT-FISHES. 561 spine the second and third interneurals unite to form a single plate, the “buckler;” the great spine is articulated to the third interneural, and there is only the vestige of a spine on the second interneural in form of a small oval bone, forked below, whose function is to act as a bolt or fulcrum to the ereat spine when the fish wishes to use it as an offensive weapon. The great spine itself is jomed by a ring to a second spine, which belongs to the third interneural. This articulation by ring exists in Lophius and a few other fishes not of this family. The first interneural does not carry a ray, and it varies much in the species whose helmet is continuous with the buckler, as in many of the Bagri and Pimelodi. In these cases the supraoccipital, extending backwards, conceals the first nterneural, passing over it to touch with its poimt the buckler formed by the second and third interneurals. In other instances, as in Synodontis and Auchenipterus, the supra- occipital and second interneural, forking and expanding, in- close and join themselves to the first interneural, but leave a larger or smaller space in the middle of the nuchal armour which they contribute to form. When the point of the supra- occipital does not reach quite to the second interneural, the first interneural remains free from connection, and occasion- ally shows as a narrow plate interposed between the other two; in such a case the helmet is not continuous with the buckler. The neural spines of the coalescent centra, which form the apparently single first vertebra, concur also in sustaining the nuchal plate-armour and the first great dorsal spine. They carry the interneurals, are joined to them by suture, and one of them is often inclined towards the occiput to assist in sus- taining the head; in fact, this part of the skeleton is con- structed to give firm mutual support. The shoulder-girdle of the Siluroids is also formed to give 20 562 FISHES. resistance to the strong weapon with which it is frequently armed. The post-temporal, as we have said above, is often united by suture to the cranium, and it obtains support below by one or two processes that are fixed on the basioccipitals and on the diapophysis of the first vertebra. In most osseous fishes the clavicle completes the lower key of the scapular arch in joining its fellow by suture or synchondrosis without the intervention of the coracoid; but in the Siluroids the coracoid descends to take part in this joint, and sometimes even to occupy the half of the suture, which is not unfrequently constructed of very deep inter- locking serratures. The solidity of this base of the pectoral spine is further augmented by the intimate union of the coracoid and scapula, which often extends to junction by suture, or even to coalescence; and these bones, moreover, give off two bony arches—the first a slender one, arising from the salient edge of the coracoid near the pectoral fin, and going to the interior face of the scapular that is applied to the interior surface of the ascending branch of the clavicle ; the second and broader supplementary arch is often perforated by a large hole; it also emanates from the same salient edge of the radius, but proceeds in opposite direction to the inferior edge of the clavicle, a little before the insertion of the pectoral spine. The two arches give attachments to the muscles that move this spine; in the Synodontes and many Bagri the upper arch remains in a cartilaginous or Lgamentous condi- tion, while in Malapterurus it is the lower arch that does not ossify, but both are fully formed in the Siluri and many other Siluroids more closely allied to that typical genus. The post-clavicle is also wanting in the Siluroids. The pterygoid and entopterygoid are reduced to a single bone, the symplectic is wholly wanting, and the palatine is merely a slender cylin- drical bone. The sub-operculum is likewise constantly absent in all the Siluroids. rT ee a ee oe Oy aN CAT-FISHES. 563 The great number of different generic types has necessi- tated a further division of this family into eight subdivisions : I. Siturip& Homaoprera&.— The dorsal and anal fins are very long, nearly equal in extent to the corresponding parts of the vertebral column. a, CLARIINA. CLARIAS.—Dorsal fin extending from the neck to the caudal, without adipose division. Cleft of the mouth transverse, anterior, of moderate width ; barbels eight ; one pair of nasal, one of maxillary, and two pairs of mandibulary barbels. Eyes small. Head depressed ; its upper and lateral parts are osseous, or covered with only a very thin skin. A dendritic accessory branchial organ is attached to the convex side of the second and fourth branchial arches, and received in a cavity behind the gill- cavity proper. Ventrals six-rayed; only the pectoral has a pungent spine. Body eel-like. Twenty species from Africa, the East Indies, and the inter- mediate parts of Asia; some attain to a length of six feet. They inhabit muddy and marshy waters; the physiological function of the accessory branchial organ is not known. Its skeleton is formed by a soft cartilaginous substance covered by mucous membrane, in which the vessels are imbedded. The vessels arise from branchial arteries, and return the blood into branchial veins. The vernacular name of the Nilotic species is “ Carmoot.” HETEROBRANCHUS differs from Clarias only in the structure of the dorsal fin, the posterior portion of which is adipose. The geographical range of this genus is not quite co- extensive with that of Clarias, inasmuch as it is hmited to Africa and the East-Indian Archipelago. Six species. b. PLOTOSINA. Piorosus.—A short dorsal fin in front, with a pungent spine ; a second long dorsal coalesces with the caudal and anal. Vomerine teeth molar-like. Barbels eight or ten; one immedi- 564. FISHES. ately before the posterior nostril, which is remote from the | Fig. 258. —Mouth of Cnidoglanis megastoma, Australia. anterior, the latter being quite in front of the snout. Cleft of the mouth transverse. Eyes small. The gill-membranes are not confluent with the skin of the isthmus. Ventral fins many- rayed. Head depressed ; body elongate. Three species are known from brackish waters of the Indian Ocean freely entering the sea. Plotosus anguillaris is distinguished by two white longitudinal bands, and is one of the most generally distributed and common Indian fishes — —— Fig, 259.—Cnidoglanis microcephalus. Copidoglanis and Cnidoglanis are two very closely allied forms, ———— chiefly from rivers and brackish waters of Australia. None of these Siluroids attain to a considerable size. Chaca, from the East Indies, belongs likewise to this sub-family. CAT-FISHES. 565 Il. Stturma HETEROPTERA— The rayed dorsal fin is very little developed, and, if rt is present, it belongs to the abdoninal portion of the vertebral column; the adipose fin is exceedingly small or absent. The extent of the anal ts not much inferior to that of the caudal vertebral column. The gul-membranes overlap the isthmus, remaining more or less separate: SILURINA. SACCOBRANCHUS.—Adipose fin none ; dorsal very short, without pungent spine, placed above the ventrals. Cleft of the mouth transverse, anterior, of moderate width ; barbels eight. Eyes rather small. The upper and lateral parts of the head osseous or covered with a very thin skin. Gill-cavity with an accessory posterior sac, extending backwards between the muscles along each side of the abdominal and caudal portions of the vertebral column. Ventrals six-rayed. Small fishes from East Indian rivers; four species are known. The lung-like extension of the branchial cavity receives water, and is surrounded by contractile transverse muscular fibres by which the water is expelled at intervals. The vessels of the sac take their origin in the last branchial artery, and pass into the aorta. Smturus.—No adipose fin; one very short dorsal, without pungent spine. Barbels four or six, one to each maxillary, and one or two to each mandible. Nostrils remote from each other. Head and body covered with soft skin. The eye is situated above the level of the angle of the mouth. The dorsal fin is anterior to the ventrals which are composed of more than eight rays. Caudal rounded. This genus, of which five species are known, inhabits the temperate parts of Europe and Asia. The species which has given the name to the whole family, is the “ Wels” of the Germans, Silurus glanis. It is found in the fresh waters east of the Rhine, and is, besides the Sturgeons, the largest of European Freshwater-fishes, and the only species of this family which occurs in Europe. Barbels six. It attains to 566 FISHES. a weight of 300 or 400 Ibs. and the flesh, especially of smaller specimens, is firm, flaky, and well flavoured. Aris- M Hil) Fig. 260.—The ‘‘ Wels,” Siluris glanis. totle described it under the name of Glanis. Its former occurrence in Scotland has justly been denied. In China it is represented by a similar species, S. asotus, which, however, has four barbels only. This sub - family is well represented by various other genera in the fresh waters of the African as well as Indian region. African genera are Schilbe and Futropius ; East Indian : Silwrichthys, Wallago, Belodontichthys, Eutropiuichthys, Cryptopterus, Callichrous, Hemisilurus, Siluranodon, Ailia, Schilbichthys, Lais, Pseudeutropius, Pangasius, Helicophaqus, and Stilondia. Ill. SiruripA ANOMALOPTERA. very short, the former belonging to the caudal vertebral column ; ‘sal and adipose fins anal very long. Ventrals in front of the dorsal. Gall- membranes entirely separate, overlapping the isthmus: (Hy- POPHTHALMINA. HyYPorpHTHALMUS.—Dorsal fin with seven rays, the first of which is slightly spinous. The lower jaw is rather the longer. Barbels six, those of the mandible long. No teeth; inter- maxillaries very feeble. Head covered with skin. Eye of mode- rate size, situated behind and below the angle of the mouth. Ventrals small, six-rayed. CAT-FISHES. 567 Four species from tropical America. The second genus of this sub-family is Helogenes from the Essequibo. IV. Situripz PROTEROPTERZ.— The rayed dorsal fin is always present, short, with not more than twelve short rays, and belongs to the abdominal portion of the vertebral column, being placed in advance of the ventrals. The adipose fin is always present and well developed, although frequently short. The extent of the anal is much inferior to that of the caudal verte- bral column. The gill-membranes are not confluent with the skin of the isthmus, their posterior margin always remaining Sree even if they are united with each other. Whenever the nasal barbel is present it belongs to the posterior nostril. a. BAGRINA. Baarus.—Adipose fin long; a short dorsal with a pungent spine and nine or ten soft rays; anal fin short, with less than twenty rays. Barbels eight. The anterior and posterior nostrils are remote from each other, the posterior being provided with a barbel. Teeth on the palate in a continuous band. Eyes with a free orbital margin. Caudal forked ; ventrals six-rayed. This genus consists of two species only, common in the Nile, viz. the “ Bayad,” B. bayad, and B. docmac. Both grow to a large size, exceeding a length of five feet, and are eaten. Chrysichthys and Clarotes are two other Siluroid genera from African rivers, closely allied to Bagrus. Similar Siluroids are common in the East Indies, and have been referred to the following genera: Macrones, Pseudobagrus, Liocassis, Bagroides, Bagrichthys, Rita, Acrochordonichthys, Akysis. b. AMIURINA. Amiurus.—Adipose fin of moderate length ; a short dorsal with a pungent spine and six soft rays; anal fin of moderate length. Barbels eight. The anterior and posterior nostrils are remote from each other, the posterior being provided with a bar- 568 FISHES. bel. Palate edentulous. Head covered with skin above. Ven- trals eight-rayed. The “Cat-fishes” of North America, of which about a dozen different species are known. One species occurs in China, Allied, but smaller forms are Hopladelus and Notu- rus, likewise from North America. c. PIMELODINA. PLATYSTOMA.—Adipose fin of moderate length ; a short dor- sal fin with a pungent spine and six or seven soft rays; anal fin rather short. Snout very long, spatulate, with the upper jaw more or less projecting ; the upper surface of the head not covered by the skin. Barbels six; the anterior and posterior nostrils remote from each other, none with a barbel. Palate toothed. Caudal forked; ventrals six-rayed, inserted behind the dorsal. Twelve species from South America, some attaining a length of six feet, the majority being ornamented with deep- black spots or bands. Allied genera from South America, hkewise distinguished by a long spatulate snout, are Sorubim, Hemisorubim, and Platystomatichthys, whilst Phractocephalus, Piramutana, Platynematichthys, Piratinga, Bagropsis, and Sciades, have a snout of ordinary length. The barbels of some are of extraordinary length, and not rarely dilated and bandlike. PrmELopus.—Adipose fin well developed ; dorsal fin short, with a more or less pungent spine and six rays; anal fin short. Barbels six, cylindrical or slightly compressed, none of them belonging to either of the nostrils, which are remote from each other. Palate edentulous. Ventrals six-rayed, inserted behind the dorsal. Of all South American genera this is represented by the ereatest number of species, more than forty being well characterised ; they differ chiefly with regard to the length of the adipose fin and barbels, and the streneth of the dorsal CAT-FISHES. 569 spine. Singularly, two species (P. platychir and P. balayi), are found in West Africa. The majority are of but moderate size and plain coloration.—Alhled South American genera (also without teeth on the palate), are Pirinampus, Conorhynchus, Notoglanis, Callophysus, Lophiosilurus. AUCHENOGLANIS.—Adipose fin rather long, dorsal short, with a pungent spine and seven rays; anal short. Snout produced, pointed, with narrow mouth. Barbels six, none of which belongs to either of the nostrils, which are remote from each other. The teeth of each jaw form a pair of small elliptic patches which are longer than broad; palate edentulous. Eyes of moderate size. Ventrals six-rayed. One species, Aw. biscutatus, from the Nile, Senegal, and other West African rivers. d. ARIINA. Arius.—Adipose fin of moderate length or short ; a short dorsal fin with a pungent spine and seven soft rays; anal fin rather short. Head osseous above; barbels six, four at the mandible, none at either of the nostrils which are close together. Eyes with a free orbital margin. Caudal fin forked ; ventrals six-rayed, behind the dorsal. Of all Siluroid genera this has the greatest number of species (about seventy), and the widest distribution, being represented in almost all tropical countries which are drained by large rivers; some of the species prefer brackish to fresh water, and a few enter the sea, but keep near to the coast. Some of the species are of small size, whilst others exceed a length of five feet. The extent of the armature of the neck and the dentition vary much in the different species, and affords two of the principal characters by which the species are separated.—The following genera are allied to Artus, Galeichthys from South Africa ; Genidens and Paradiplomystax from Brazil; Diplomystax from Chile; . SF DILL Fig. 292.—Salmo brachypoma, b, SALVELINI: Charr. 1. S. umbla.—The “ Ombre chevalier” of the Swiss lakes. 2. S. salvelinus— The “Selbling” of the Alpine lakes of Bavaria and Austria. 3. S. alpinus.—The common Northern Charr, growing to a length of four feet, and migratory. 4, S. killinensis—The Loch Killin Charr, Inverness-shire. 5, S. willughbii.—The Loch Windermere Charr. 6. S. perisiiThe “ Torgoch” of Wales. 7. S. grayii—The “Freshwater Herring” of Lough Melvin, Treland. 646 FISHES. 8. S. colii—Charr of Loughs Eske and Dan. 9. 8. hucho.—The “ Huchen” of the Danube, growing to the size of the Salmon. 10. JS. alipes from lakes in Boothia Felix and Greenland. 11. S. arcturus—The most northern species from 82° lat. 12. S. fontinalis—The common “Brook - trout” of the United States. 13. S. oquassa—A lake species from the State of Maine. Oncorhynchus differs from Salmo only in the increased number of anal rays, which are more than fourteen. All the species are migratory, ascending American and Asiatic rivers flowing into the Pacific. The Californian Salmon (0. guinnat ?) belongs to this genus. Other allied genera are Brachymystax and Luciotrutta. PLEcoGLOssus.—Body covered with very small scales. Cleft of the mouth wide; maxillary long. Dentition feeble ; inter- maxillaries with a few small, conical, pointed teeth; the teeth of the maxillaries and mandibles are broad, truncated, lamellated and ‘serrated, movable, seated in a fold of the skin. The man- dibles terminate each in a small knob, and are not jointed at the symphysis. The mucous membrane in the interior of the mouth —between the terminal halves of the mandibles—forms a pecu- liar organ, being raised into folds, with a pair of pouches in front and a single one behind. Tongue very small, with minute teeth, its apical part being toothless ; palate apparently without teeth. A small aberrant form of Freshwater-Salmonoids abund- antly found in Japan and the Island of Formosa. OsMERUS.—Body covered with scales of moderate size. Cleft of the mouth wide ; maxillary long, extending to, or nearly to, the hind margin of the orbit. Dentition strong ; intermaxillary and maxillary teeth small, much smaller than those of the man- dible. Vomer with a transverse series of teeth, several of which are large, fang-like ; a series of conical teeth along the palatine and pterygoid bones. Tongue with very strong fang-like teeth anteriorly, and with several longitudinal series of smaller ones posteriorly. Pectoral fins moderately developed. Pyloric ap- pendages very short, in small number ; ova small. SALMONIDA, 647 The “Smelt ” (0. eperlanus) is common on many places of the coasts of Northern Europe and America. In the sea it grows to a leneth of eight inches ; but, singularly, it frequently migrates from the sea into rivers and lakes, where its growth is very much retarded. That this habit is one of very old date, is evident from the fact that this small freshwater form occurs, and is fully acclimatised, in lakes which have now no open communication with the sea. And still more singularly, this same habit, with the same result, has been observed in the Smelt of New Zealand (Retropinna richardsonii). The Smelt is considered a delicacy in Europe, as well as in America, where the same species occurs. ‘Two other allied genera, Hypomesus and Thaleichthys, are found on the Pacific coast of North America, the latter being caught in immense numbers,and known bythe name“ Eulachon” and “Oulachan ;” it is so fat, that it is equally used as food and as candle. Ma.iotus.—Body covered with minute scales, which are somewhat larger along the lateral line and along each side of the belly ; in mature males these scales become elongate, lanceolate, densely tiled, with free projecting points, forming villous bands. Cleft of the mouth wide; maxillary very thin, lamelliform, ex- tending to below the middle of the eye. Lower jaw the longer, partly received between the maxillaries. Dentition very feeble ; the teeth forming single series ; only the teeth on the tongue are somewhat larger and disposed in an elliptical patch. Pectoral fins large, horizontal, with broad base. Pyloric appendages very short, in small number; ova small. The “ Capelin” (JZ. villosus) is found on the Arctic coasts of America and of Kamtschatka. It is caught in immense numbers by the natives, who consume it fresh, or dry it for use in the winter. Its length does not exceed nine inches. CorEGONUS.—Body covered with scales of moderate size. Cleft of the mouth small; maxillary broad, short or of moderate length, not extending behind the orbit. Teeth, if present, 648 _ FISHES. extremely minute and deciduous. Dorsal fin of moderate length ; caudal deeply forked. Ova small. NAY a. Mt Wey bak Be , me Fig. 293.—Coregonus oxyrhynchus. The majority of the species, of which more than forty are known, are lacustrine species; and comparatively few are Fig. 294.—Head of Coregonus oxyrhynchus. subject to periodical migrations to the sea, like Salmo. They are confined to the northern parts of temperate Europe, Asia, and North America. Their distribution is local, but some- times three and more species are found in the same lake. They abound in every lake and river of the northern parts of North America, and are known by the name of “ White-fish.” ra SALMONIDA. 649 They are of vital importance to some tribes of the native population, The European C. oxyrhynchus is as much a marine as a freshwater species. In the British Islands several small species occur, viz. C. elupeoides, the “ Gwyniad,” Fig. 295.—Coregonus clupeoides. “Schelly,” or “Powen” from the great lakes; C. vandesius, the “ Vendace” of Lochmaben; and C. pollan, the “ Pollan” of the Ivish lakes. The latter is brought in quantities to Belfast market during the season, that is, at the time when it rises from the depths of Lough Neagh to deposit its spawn near the shore. Thomson says that in September 1834 some 17,000 were taken there at three or four draughts of the net. Some of the species of the continent of Europe and America attain to a much larger size than the British species, viz. to a length of two feet. THYMALLUS.—Principally distinguished from Coregonus by its long many-rayed dorsal fin. “ Graylings ”—five species, inhabiting clear streams of the north of Europe, Asia, and North America. The best known 650 FISHES. are the “ Poisson bleu” of the Canadian voyageurs (Zh. sig- nifer), and the European Grayling (7. vulgaris). SALANX.—Body elongate, compressed, naked or covered with small, exceedingly fine, deciduous scales. Head elongate and much depressed, terminating in a long, flat, pointed snout. Eye small. Cleft of the mouth wide ; jaws and palatine bones with conical teeth, some of the intermaxillaries and mandibles being enlarged ; no teeth on the vomer; tongue with a single series of curved teeth. Dorsal fin placed far behind the ventrals, but in front of the anal; anal long ; adipose fin small ; caudal forked. Pseudobranchiz well developed ; air-bladder none. The entire alimentary canal straight, without bend; pyloric appendages none. Ova small. This small, transparent, or whitish fish GS. chinensis) is well known at Canton and other places of the coast of China as “ Whitebait,” and considered a delicacy. It is evidently a fish which lives at a considerable depth in the sea, and approaches the coast only at certain seasons. Finally, this family is represented in the deep sea by three genera, Argentina, Microstoma, and Bathylagus, of which the two former live at moderate depths, and have been known for a long time, whilst the last was discovered during the “ Chal- lenger” expedition in the Atlantic and Antarctic Oceans at depths of 1950 and 2040 fathoms. As Argentina is sometimes found in the North Atlantic, and even near the British coasts, we give its principal characters. ARGENTINA.—NScales rather large ; cleft of the mouth small; intermaxillaries and maxillaries very short, not extending to below the orbit. Eye large. Jaws without teeth; an arched series of minute teeth across the head of the vomer and on the fore part of the palatines; tongue armed with a series of small curved teeth on each side. Dorsal fin short, in advance of the ventrals ; caudal deeply forked. Pseudobranchiz well developed. Pyloric appendages in moderate numbers. Ova small. Four species are known, of which 4. silus and A. hebridica HAPLOCHITONIDA, 651 have been found occasionally on the North British, and, more frequently, on the Norwegian coast. The other species are from the Mediterranean. Attaining to a length of 18 inches. SIXTEENTH FAMILY—PERCOPSIDA. Body covered with ctenoid scales ; head naked. Margin of the upper yaw formed by the intermaxillaries only ; opercular apparatus complete. Barbels none. Gill - openings wide. Adipose fin present. One genus and species only (Percopsis guttatus) ; interest- ing as having the general characters of Salmonoids, but the mouth and scales of a Percoid. Freshwaters of the northern United States. SEVENTEENTH FAMILY—HAPLOCHITONID. Body naked or scaly (eycloid). Margin of the upper jaw Jormed by the intermaxillary ; opercular apparatus complete. Barbels none. Gul - opening wide; pseudobranchie. Atr- bladder simple. Adipose fin present. Ovaries laminated ; the eggs fall into the cavity of the abdomen, there being no oviduct. Pyloric appendages none. Freshwater-fishes which represent the Salmonoids in the Fig. 296.—Prototroctes oxyrhynchus, New Zealand. southern hemisphere. Two genera only are known, Hap- lochiton (Fig. 104, p. 250) abundant in lakes and the streams 652 FISHES. falling into the Straits of Magelhen and in the rivers of Chile and the Falkland Islands, It has the general appearance of a Trout, but is naked. Prototroctes, with the habit of a Core- gonus, scaly, and provided with minute teeth ; one species (P. marena) is common in South Australia, the other (P. ory- rhynchus) in New Zealand. The settlers in these colonies call them Grayling; the Maori name of the second species is “ Upokororo.” EIGHTEENTH FAMILY—GONORHYNCHID. Head and body entirely covered with spiny scales ; mouth with barbels, Margin of the wpper jaw formed by the inter- maxillary, which, although short, is continued downwards asa thick lip, situated in front of the maxillary. Adipose fin none ; the dorsal fin is opposite to the ventrals, and short, like the anal. Stomach simple, without blind sac; pyloric appendages in small number, Pseudobranchice ; air-bladder absent. Gill-openings NATTOW. Fig. 298.—Scale of Gonorhynchus greyi. One genus and species only (Gonorhynchus greyi) is known ; it is a semi-pelagic fish, not very rare off the Cape of Good Hope, and in the Australian and Japanese seas. From 12 to 18 inches OSTEOGLOSSID A. 653 long. The colonists in New Zealand name it “ Sand-eel,” as it frequents bays with sandy bottom. It is eaten. NINETEENTH FAMILY—HYODONTIDA. Body covered with cycloid scales ; head naked ; barbels none. Margin of the wpper jaw formed by the intermaxillaries mesially, and by the maxillaries laterally, the latter being articulated to the end of the former. Opercular apparatus complete. Adipose jin none ; the dorsal fin belongs to the caudal portion of the vertebral column. Stomach horseshoe-shaped, without blind sac ; intestine short ; one pyloric appendage. Pseudobranchice none ; air-bladder simple. Gill-openings wide. The ova fall into the abdominal cavity before exclusion. One genus and species only (Hyodon tergisus) is known, generally called “Moon-eye.” It is abundant in the western streams and great lakes of North America. From 12 to 18 inches long. TWENTIETH FAMILY—PANTODONTIDA. Body covered with large cycloid scales; sides of the head osseous. Margin of the upper yaw formed by the single inter- maxillary mesially, and by the maxillaries laterally. The dorsal fin belongs to the caudal portion of the vertebral column, is short, opposite and similar to the anal. Gull-openings wide ; gill-covers consisting of a preoperculum and operculum only. Branchiostegals numerous. Pseudobranchie none ; air-bladder simple. Stomach without coecal sac; one pyloric appendage. Sexual organs with a duct. A small freshwater-fish (Pantodon buchholzi), singularly alike to a Cyprinodont, from the west coast of Africa. TWENTY-First FAMILY—OSTEOGLOSSIDA. Body covered with large hard scales, composed of preces like 654 FISHES. mosaic. Head scaleless ; its integuments nearly entirely replaced by bone ; lateral line composed of wide openings of the mucus- duct. Margin of the upper jaw formed by the intermaxillaries mesially, and by the mazillaries laterally. The dorsal fin belongs to the caudal portion of the vertebral column, 1s opposite and very similar to the anal fin; both approximate to the rounded caudal (with which they are abnormally confluent). Gill-openings wide ; pseudobranchie none ; air-bladder simple or cellular. Stomach without coecal sac; pyloric appendages two. Large freshwater-fishes of the tropics, whose singular geographical distribution has been noticed above (p. 223). OsTEOGLOSSUM.—Cleft of the mouth very wide, oblique, with the lower jaw prominent. A pair of barbels at the lower jaw. Abdomen trenchant. Bands of rasp-like teeth on the vomer, palatine and pterygoid bones, on the tongue and hyoid, Pectoral fins elongate. O. bicirrhosum from Brazil and Guyana, O. formosuwm from Borneo and Sumatra, O. leichardti from Queensland. ARAPAIMA.—Cleft of the mouth wide, with the lower jaw prominent; barbels none. Abdomen rounded. Jaws with an outer series of small conical teeth ; broad bands of rasp-like teeth on the vomer, palatines, pterygoids, sphenoid, os linguale, and hyoid. Pectoral fins of moderate length. « RCC uy a ( COX ate Srelolees ue cae raat ¥ Ma ue CRY MG i { ( a i a a ine RA ut ( y) ae és aos : : Fig. 299.—Arapaima gigas. The largest freshwater Teleostean known, exceeding a leneth of 15 feet and a weight of 400 pounds. It is common in the large rivers of Brazil and the Guyanas, and esteemed as an article of food. When salted it is exported in large quantities from the inland fisheries to the seaports. HERRINGS. 655 HETEROTIS.—Cleft of the mouth rather small, with the jaws subequal ; barbels none. A single series of small teeth in the jaws ; pterygoids and hyoid with a patch of small conical teeth ; none on the vomer or palatines. This fish (H. niloticus), which is not uncommon in the Upper Nile and the West African rivers, exhibits several anatomical peculiarities. The fourth branchial arch supports a spiral accessory organ, the function of which is still unexplained. The air-bladder is cellular, and the stomach consists of a membranous and a muscular portion. TWENTY-SECOND FAMILY—CLUPEIDZ. Body covered with scales; head naked; barbels none, Abdomen frequently compressed into a serrated edge. Margin of the upper jaw formed by the intermaxillaries mesially, and by the maxillaries laterally ; maxillaries composed of at least three movable yieces. Opercular apparatus complete. Adipose fin none. Dorsal not elongate; anal sometimes very long. Stomach with a blind sac ; pyloric appendages numerous. Gull- apparatus much developed, the gill-openings being generally very wide. Pseudobranchie generally present. Atr-bladder more or less simple. The family of “ Herrings” is probably unsurpassed by any other in the number of individuals, although others comprise a much greater variety of species. The Herrings are princi- pally coast-fishes, or, at least, do not go far from the shore; none belong to the deep-sea fauna; scarcely any have pelagic habits, but many enter or lve in fresh waters communicating with the sea. They are spread over all the temperate and tropical zones. Fossil remains of Herrings are numerous, but the pertinence of some of the genera to this family is open to serious doubts, as the remains are too fragmentary to allow of determining whether they belong to Salmonoids or Clupeoids. Therefore, Agassiz comprised both 656 FISHES. families in one—Halecide. Many of the remains belong to recent genera, which are readily recognised, as Clupea, Engraulis and Chanos, principally from the schists of Glaris and Licata, from Monte Bolea and the Lebanon. Others, like Thrissopater, from the Gault at Folkestone, Leptosomus, Opisthopteryx, Spaniodon, from the chalk and tertiary forma- tions, can be readily associated with recent genera. But the majority do not show an apparent affinity to the present fauna. Thus, Halee from the chalk of Bohemia, Platinz and Coelogaster from Monte Boleca, Rhinellus from Monte Bolca and Mount Lebanon, Scombroclupea, with finlets behind the anal, from the Lebanon and Comen, and Crossognathus from tertiary Swiss formations, allied to Megalops, Spathodactylus from the same locality, and Chirocentrites from Mount Lebanon, ete. Finally, a genus recently discovered in tertiary formations of Northern Italy, Hemitrichas, has been classed with the Clupeoids, from which, however, it differs by having two short dorsal fins, so that it must be considered, without doubt, to be the represent- ative of a distinct family. ENGRAULIS (including CETENGRAULIS).—Scales large or of moderate size. Snout more or less conical, projecting beyond the lower jaw. Teeth small or rudimentary. Intermaxillaries very small, hidden ; maxillary long, attached to the cheek by a scarcely distensible membrane. Anal fin of moderate or great length. Branchiostegals short, from nine to fourteen in number, Not less than forty-three different species of “ Anchovies” are known from temperate and tropical seas. They exhibit marked differences in the length of their maxillary bone, which sometimes does not reach the gill-opening, whilst in other species it extends far beyond it ; and in the number of their anal rays, which varies from 20 to 80. Some have the upper pectoral ray prolonged into a filament, thus leading towards the succeeding genus, Coilia. The majority are recognised, besides, by their peculiar structure, by a broad HERRINGS. 657 silvery, lateral band, similar to that observed in the Atherines. The most celebrated Anchovy is £. encrasicholus, very plentiful in the Mediterranean, but rarely wandering northwards. It is the species which, preserved in salt, is exported to all parts of the world, although similarly lucrative fisheries of Anchovies might be established in Tasmania where the same species occurs, in Chile, China, Japan, California, at Buenos Ayres, each of which countries possesses Anchovies by no means inferior to the Mediterranean species. CorLtA.—Body terminating in a long tapering tail. Scales of moderate size. Snout and jaws as in Engraulis, Anal fin exceedingly long, confluent with the caudal. The two or three Vd tidy yy Fig. 300.—Coilia clupeoides. upper pectoral rays are much prolonged, and their branches form four, six, or seven filaments, Ten species from Indian and Chinese seas. CHATOESSUS.—Body compressed ; abdomen serrated. Scales of moderate size. Snout obtuse, or obtusely conical, more or less projecting beyond the cleft of the mouth, which is narrow, more or less transverse. Maxillary joined to the ethmoid, its upper portion being behind the intermaxillary. Teeth none. Anal fin rather long ; dorsal opposite to the ventrals, or to the space between ventrals and anal. Gill-membranes entirely separate ; branchial arches forming two angles, one pointing forward and the other backwards ; the fourth branchial arch with an accessory organ; branchiostegals of moderate length, five or six in number, Ten species from the coasts, brackish and fresh waters of 2U 658 FISHES. Central America (one species ranges to New York), Australia, the East Indies, and Japan. CLUPEA.—Body compressed, with the abdomen serrated, the serrature extending forwards to the thorax. Scales of moderate or large, rarely of small size. Upper jaw not projecting beyond the lower. Cleft of the mouth of moderate width. Teeth, if present, rudimentary and deciduous. Anal fin of moderate extent, with less than thirty rays; dorsal fin opposite to the ventrals. Caudal forked. This genus comprises more than sixty different species, the geographical distribution of which coincides with that of the family. The majority are of greater or less utility to man, but a few tropical species (C. thrissa, C. venenosa, and others) acquire, probably from their food, highly poisonous properties, so as to endanger the life of persons eating them. The most noteworthy species are— 1. C. harengus (the “ Herring”’).—It is readily recognised by having an ovate patch of very small teeth on the vomer. D. 17-20. A.16-18. L. lat. 53-59. Vert.56. Guill-cover smooth, without radiating ridges. It inhabits, in incredible numbers, the German Ocean, the northern parts of the Atlantic, and the seas north of Asia. The Herring of the Atlantic coasts of North America is identical with that of Europe. A second species has been supposed to exist on the British coast (C leachiz), but it comprises only individuals of a smaller size, the produce of an early or late spawn. Also the so-called “Whitebait ” is not a distinct species, but consists chiefly of the fry or the young of herrings, and is obtained “in perfection” at localities where these small fishes find an abundance of food, as in the estuary of the Thames. [Separate accounts on the Herring may be found in Cuvier and Valen- ciennes, ‘“‘ Hist. nat. des Poissons,” vol. xx.; J. M. Mitchell, ‘* The Herring, its Natural History and National Importance,” Edinb. 1864, S8vo; P. Neucrantz, ‘‘ De Harengo,” Liibeck, 1654; J. S. Dodd, ‘‘ Essay towards a Natural History of the Herring,” Lond. 1768, 8vo; Bock, “ Versuch einer vollstandigen Natur-und Handels- Geschichte des Herings,” Konigsberg, 1769, S8vo.] HERRINGS. 659 2. C. mirabilis——The Herring of the North Pacific. 3. C. sprattus—The “ Sprat.” Without vomerine teeth. D. 15-18. A. 17-20. L. lat. 47-48. Vert. 47-49. Gill-cover. smooth, without radiating ridges. Abundant on the Atlantic coasts of Europe. 4. (. thrissa.—One of the most common West Indian fishes, distinguished by the last dorsal ray being prolonged into a filament. Hyrtl has discovered a small accessory branchial organ in this species. 5. C. alosa.—The “Shad ” or “ Allice Shad,” with very fine and long gill-rakers, from 60 to 80 on the horizontal part of the outer branchial arch, and with one or more black lateral blotches. Coasts of Europe, ascending rivers. 6. C. finta—The “Shad” or “Twaite Shad,” with stout osseous gill-rakers, from 21 to 27 on the horizontal part of the outer branchial arch, and spotted like the preceding species. Coasts of Europe, ascending rivers, and found in abundance in the Nile. 7. CO. menhaden.—The “ Mossbanker,” common on the At- lantic coasts of the United States. The economic value of this fish is surpassed in America only by that of the Gadoids, and derived chiefly from its use as bait for other fishes, and from the oil extracted from it, the annual yield of the latter exceed- ing that of the whale (from American Fisheries). The refuse of the oil factories supplies a material of much value for artificial manures. [See G. Brown Goode, ‘‘The Natural and Economical History of the American Menhaden,” in U.S. Commission of Fish and Fisheries, Part V., Washington, 1879, 8vo. ] 8. C. sapidissima—The American Shad, abundant, and an important food-fish on the Atlantic coasts of North America. Spawns in fresh water. 9. C. mattowocca.—The “Gaspereau” or “ Ale-wife,” com- mon on the Atlantic coasts of North America, ascending into 660 FISHES. freshwater in early spring, and spawning in ponds and lakes. 10. C. pilchardus.—The “ Pilchard” or the “Sardine,” equally abundant in the British Channel, on the coast of Portugal, and in the Mediterranean, and readily recognised by radiat- ing ridges on the operculum, descending towards the sub- operculum. 11. CO. sagax.—Representing the Pilchard in the Pacific, and found in equally large shoals on the coasts of California, Chile, New Zealand, and Japan. 12. C. toli.—The subject of a very extensive fishery on the coast of Sumatra for the sake of its roes, which are salted and exported to China, the dried fish themselves being sent into the interior of the island. The fish is called “Trubu” by the Malays, about 18 inches long, and it is said that between fourteen and fifteen millions are caught annually. 13. C. scombrina.—The “Oil-Sardine” of the eastern coast of the Indian Peninsula. Other, but less important genera of Clupeoids with ser- rated abdomen, are Clupeoides, Pellonula, Clupeichthys, Pellona, Pristigaster, and Chirocentrodon (these three last with very small or without any ventral fins). ALBuULA.—Body oblong, moderately compressed ; abdomen flat. Scales of moderate size, adherent; lateral line distinct. Eyes covered with a broad annular adipose membrane. Snout pointed, the upper jaw projecting beyond the lower. Mouth inferior, of moderate width, with villiform teeth ; intermaxillary juxtaposed to the upper anterior edge of the maxillary. Dorsal fin opposite to the ventrals ; anal fin shorter than dorsal. Gill- membranes entirely separate, with numerous branchiostegals. One species only (A. conorhynchus), ranging over all tro- pical and sub-tropical seas, and very common in many locali- HERRINGS, 661 ties near the coasts. It grows toa length of from two to three feet, and is not valued as food. Exops. — Body rather elongate, moderately compressed ; abdomen flat. Scales small, adherent; lateral line distinct. A narrow osseous lamella, attached to the mandibulary symphysis, covers the part between the mandibles. Snout pointed ; mouth wide, anterior ; intermaxillary short, maxillary forming the lateral part of the mouth. Bands of villiform teeth in the jaws, on the vomer, palatine and pterygoid bones, on the tongue, and on the base of the skull. Dorsal fin opposite to ventrals ; anal rather shorter than dorsal. Gill-membranes entirely separate, with very numerous branchiostegals. Two species, of which one, Z. sawrus, is, like the preced- Fig. 301.—Elops saurus. ing fish, spread over all tropical and sub-tropical seas ; it exceeds a length of three feet, and is not esteemed as food. MecALops.—Body oblong, compressed, abdomen flat. Scales large, adherent ; lateral line distinct. A narrow osseous lamella, attached to the mandibulary symphysis, between the mandibles. Snout obtusely conical ; mouth anterior, lower jaw prominent ; intermaxillary short ; maxillary forming the lateral part of the mouth. Bands of villiform teeth in the jaws, on the vomer, palatine and pterygoid bones, on the tongue and on the base of the skull. Dorsal fin opposite to, or immediately behind, the ventrals; anal rather larger than dorsal. Gill-membranes en- tirely separate, with numerous branchiostegals. Pseudobranchiz none. Two species, one belonging to the Indo-Pacific (1. eypri- noides), the other to the Atlantic (IZ thrissoides) ; they are the largest fishes of this family, exceeding a length of five 662 FISHES. feet, and excellent eating. Young specimens enter freely fresh waters. CHANOS.—Body oblong, compressed ; abdomen-flat. Scales small, striated, adherent ; lateral line distinct. Snout depressed ; mouth small, anterior, transverse, the lower jaw with a small symphysial tubercle. Intermaxillary in juxtaposition to the upper anterior edge of maxillary. Teeth none. Dorsal fin opposite to the ventrals ; anal small, shorter than dorsal ; caudal deeply forked. Gill-membranes entirely united below, and free from the isthmus. Branchiostegals four, long. An accessory branchial organ in a cavity behind the gill-cavity proper. Air- bladder divided by a constriction into an anterior and posterior portion. Mucous membrane of the cesophagus raised in a spiral fold. Intestine with many convolutions. Two species from the Indo-Pacific, of which Ch. salmoneus is extremely common; it enters fresh waters, and exceeds a leneth of four feet ; its flesh is highly esteemed. The acces- Fig. 302.—Chanos salmoneus. sory branchial organ and the skeleton have been described by Muller, “Bau und Grenzen der Ganoiden,” p. 75 ; and by Hyrtl, “ Denksehr. Ak. Wiss. Wien.” xxi. 1883, p. 1. The remaining genera belonging to this family are Spra- telloides, Dussumieria, and Htrumeus, which together form a small group, distinguished by an anterior and lateral mouth, by the upper jaw not overlapping the lower, by a rounded abdomen, and by lacking the gular plate of some of the pre- ceding genera. CHIROCENTRIDA. 663 TWENTY-THIRD FAMILY—BATHYTHRISSID2. Body oblong, with rounded abdomen, covered with cycloid scales; head naked ; barbels none. Margin of the wpper jaw Jormed by the intermaaillaries mesially, and by the maxillaries laterally. Opercular apparatus complete. Adipose fin none ; dorsal fin much elongate, many rayed ; anal fin short. Stomach with a blind sac ; pyloric appendages numerous. Gull- apparatus well developed ; pseudobranchie ; gill-openings wide ; an air-bladder. Ova very small ; ovaries without duct. One genus and species only (Bathythrissa dorsalis) from deep water (350. fathoms) off the coast of Japan. This re- markable fish has the appearance of a Coregonus, and attains to a length of two feet. Nothing is known of its osteology, but possibly a fossil genus from the Gyps of Montmartre ; Notwus, which has also a long dorsal fin, may prove to belong to the same family. TWENTY-FouRTH FAMILY—CHIROCENTRID. Body covered with thin, deciduous scales; barbels none. Margin of the upper jaw formed by the intermaxillaries mesi- ally, and by the maxillaries laterally, both bones being firmly united, in juxtaposition. Opercular apparatus complete. Adi- pose fin none ; the dorsal fin belongs to the caudal portion of the vertebral column. Stomach with a blind sac; intestine short, the mucous membrane forming a spiral fold ; pylorie appendages none. Pseudobranchiw none; air-bladder imeom- pletely divided into cells ; gill-opening wide. One genus and species only (Chirocentrus dorab) is known, which is common in the Indian Ocean, and attains to a length of about three feet; it is not esteemed as food. Remains of fishes similar to Ohirocentrus are found in the marl slates of Padang, in Sumatra. 664 FISHES. TWENTY-FIFTH FAMILY—ALEPOCEPHALID A. Body with or without scales; head naked ; barbels none. Margin of the upper jaw formed by the intermaxillaries and maxillaries, the former being placed along the wpper anterior edge of the latter. Opercular apparatus complete. Adipose jin none; the dorsal fin belongs to the caudal portion of the vertebral column. Stomach curved, without blind sae ; pyloric appendages in moderate number. Pseudobranchie ; air-bladder absent. Crill-openings very wide. Before the voyage of the “Challenger” one species only of this family was known, Alepocephalus rostratus, a rare fish from the Mediterranean; now, four genera with seven species are known, and there is no doubt that this family is one of the most characteristic, and will prove to be one of the most generally distributed forms, of the deep-sea. Their vertical range varies between 345 (Xenodermichthys) and 2150 (Bathy- troctes) fathoms. They approach the Salmonoids, but lack invariably the adipose fin. Their dentition is very feeble; their eye large; bones thin. Coloration black. ALEPOCEPHALUS has thin cycloid scales; a mouth of moderate width, and no teeth on the maxillary. BATHYTROCTES has cycloid scales, a wide mouth, and teeth on the maxillary as well as intermaxillary, PLATYTROCTES has small keeled scales and no ventrals. XENODERMICHTHYS with fine nodules instead of scales. TWENTY-SIXTH FAMILY—NOTOPTERIDA. Head and body scaly ; barbels none. Margin of the upper jaw formed by the intermaxillaries mesially, and by the macilaries laterally. Opercular apparatus incomplete. Taal prolonged, tapering. Adipose fin none. Dorsal short, belonging to the caudal portion of the vertebral column ; anal very long. Stomach without blind sac; two pyloric appendages. Pseudo- HOPLOPLEURIDA. 665 branchiw none; air-bladder present, divided in the interior. The ova full into the cavity of the abdomen before exclusion. On each side a parieto-mastoid cavity leading into the interion of the skull. One genus only (Notopterus) with five species which inhabit fresh waters of the East Indies and West Africa. Well-preserved remains of this genus occur in the marl slates of Padang, in Sumatra. Their air-bladder is divided into several compartments, and terminates in two horns anteriorly and posteriorly, the anterior horns being in direct connection with the auditory organ. TWENTY-SEVENTH FAMILY—HALOSAURIDA. Body covered with cycloid scales; head scaly ; barbels none. Margin of the upper jaw formed by the intermaxillaries mesially, and by the maxillaries laterally. Opercular apparatus incom- plete. Adipose fin none. The short dorsal belongs to the abdominal part of the vertebral column; anal very long. Stomach with a blind sac ; intestine short; pyloric appendages in moderate number. Pseudobranchie none. Arr-bladder large, simple ; gill-openings wide. Ovaries closed. The only genus belonging to this family was discovered by the Madeiran ichthyologist Johnson, in 1865; but since then the naturalists of the “Challenger” expedition have added four other species, showing that this type is a deep-sea form and widely distributed; the specimens were dredged in depths varying from 560 to 2750 fathoms. TWENTY-EIGHTH FAMILY—HOPLOPLEURIDA. Body generally with four series of subtriangular scutes, and with intermediate scale-like smaller ones. One (?) dorsal only ; head long, with the gaws produced. 666 FISHES. Extinct ; developed in the chalk and extending into tertiary formations: Dercetis (with the upper jaw longest), Leptotrachelus, Pelargorhynchus, Plinthophorus, Saurorhamphus (with the lower jaw longest), Hurypholis ; Ischyrocephalus (2). The latter genus, from cretaceous formations of Westphalia, is said to have two dorsal fins. TWENTY-NINTH FAMILY—GYMNOTID&. Head scaleless; barbels none. Body elongate, eel-shaped. Margin of the upper jaw formed in the middle by the inter- maxillaries, and laterally by the maxillartes. Dorsal fin absent or reduced to an adipose strip ; caudal generally absent, the tail terminating i a point. Anal fin exceedingly long. Ventrals none. LHrtremity of the tapering tail capable of being repro- duced. Vent situated at, or at a short distance behind, the throat. Humeral arch attached to the skull. Ribs well de- veloped. Gill-openings rather narrow. Air-bladder present, double. Stomach with a cecal sac and pyloric appendages. Ovaries with oviducts. Kel-like freshwater fishes from Tropical America. STERNARCHUS,—Tail terminating in a distinct small caudal fin. Teeth small. A rudimentary dorsal fin is indicated by an adipose band fitting into a groove on the back of the tail; it is easily detached, so as to appear as a thong-like appendage fixed in front. Branchiostegals four. Eight species, some have the snout compressed and of moderate length, like St. Bonapartii from the River Amazons ; others have it produced into a long tube, as St. oxyrhynchus from the Essequibo. RHAMPHICHTHYS.—Caudal fin none; teeth none; no trace of a dorsal fin. No free orbital margin. Six species, of which, again, some have a tubiform snout, whilst in the others it is short. ELECTRIC EEL. 667 STERNOPYGUS.—Caudal fin none; no trace of a dorsal fin. Both jaws with small villiform teeth ; similar teeth on each side of the palate. Body scaly. Four species, very common, and growing to a length of 30 inches. Carapus.—Caudal fin none; no trace of a dorsal fin. A series of conical teeth in each jaw. Anterior nostrils, wide in the upper lip. Body scaly. One species (C. fasciatus) extremely common, and found all over tropical America, east of the Andes, from 18 to 24 inches long. Gymnotus.—Caudal and dorsal fins absent ; anal extending to the end of the tail. Scales none. Teeth conical, in a single series. Eyes exceedingly small. The “ Electric Eel” is the most powerful of electric fishes, growing to a length of six feet, and extremely abundant in certain localities of Brazil and the Guyanas. The electric organ consists of two pairs of longitudinal bodies, situated immediately below the skin, above the muscles; one pair on the back of the tail, and the other pair along the anal fin. Each fasciculus is composed of flat partitions or septa, with transverse divisions between them. The outer edge of the septa appear in nearly parallel lines in the direction of the longitu- dinal axis of the body, and consist of thin membranes, which are easily torn; they serve the same purpose as the columns in the analogous organ of the Torpedo, making the walls or abutments for the perpendicular and transverse dissepiments, which are exceedingly numerous, and so closely ageregated as to seem almost in contact. The minute prismatic cells, intercepted between these two sorts of plates, contain a gelatinous matter; the septa are about one-thirtieth of an inch from each other, and one inch in length contains a series of 240 cells, giving an enormous surface to the electric organs. The whole apparatus is supphed with more than 200 nerves, See 668 FISHES. which are the continuations of the rami anteriores of the spinal nerves. In their course they give out branches to the muscles of the back, and to the skin of the animal. In the Gymnotus, as in the Torpedo, the nerves supplying the electric organs are much larger than those bestowed on any part for the purposes of sensation or movement. The graphic description by Humboldt of the capture of Electric Eels by horses driven into the water, which would receive the electric discharges and thus exhaust the fishes, seems to rest either on the imagination of some person who told it to the great traveller or on some isolated incident. recent travellers have not been able to verify it even in the same parts of the country where the practice was said to exist. THIRTIETH FAMILY—SYMBRANCHID. Body elongate, naked or covered with minute scales ; barbels none. Margin of the upper jaw formed by the intermaxillarves only, the well developed maaillaries lying behind and parallel tothem. Paired fins none. Vertical fins rudimentary, reduced to more or less distinct cutaneous folds. Vent situated at a great distance behind the head. Ribs present. Cull-openings confluent into one slit situated on the ventral surface. Atr- bladder none. Stomach without cecal sac or pyloric appen- dages. Ovaries with oviducts. The fishes of this family consist of freshwater-fishes from tropical America and Asia, which, however, enter also brackish water; and of a truly marime genus from Australia. AMPHIPNOUS.—Vent in the posterior half of the body, which is covered with minute scales longitudinally arranged. A common fish (A. cuchia) in Bengal, remarkable for its singular respiratory apparatus. It has only three branchial arches, with rudimentary branchial lamin, and with very narrow slits between the arches. To supplement this in- EELS. 669 sufficient respiratory apparatus, a lung-like sac is developed on each side of the body behind the head, opening between the hyoid and first branchial arch. The interior of the sac is abundantly provided with blood-vessels, the arterial coming from the branchial arteries, whilst those issuing from it unite to form the aorta. A. cwchia approaches the Eels in having the humeral arch not attached to the skull. MonopTerus.—Vent in the posterior half of the body, which is naked. Three branchial arches with rudimentary gills, but without breathing sac. One species (JZ. javanicus), which is extremely common in the East Indian Archipelago and in the eastern parts of the Continent. Upwards of three feet long. _ SyMBRANCHUS.—Vent in the posterior half of the body, which is naked. Four branchial arches with well developed gills. Three species, of which one (S. marmoratus) is extremely common in tropical America, and the other (S. bengalensis) not less so in the East Indies. CHILOBRANCHUS.—Vent in the anterior half of the length of the body, which is naked. Vertical fins reduced to a simple cutaneous fold, without rays. A small fish (Ch. dorsalis) from North Western Australia and Tasmania. THIRTY-FIRST FAMILY—MURANIDA. Body elongate, cylindrical or band-shaped, naked or with rudimentary scales. Vent situated at a great distance from the head. Ventral fins none. Vertical fins, if present, confluent, or separated by the projecting tip of the tail. Sides of the upper jaw formed by the tooth-bearing maxillaries, the fore part by the intermaxillary, which is more or less coalescent with the vomer and ethmoid. Humeral arch not attached to the skull. Stomach urth a blind sac; no pyloric appendages. Organs of reproduction without efferent ducts. ) 670 FISHES. The “Eels” are spread over almost all fresh waters and seas of the temperate and tropical zones; some descend to the greatest depths of the oceans. The young of some have a limited pelagic existence. (Leptocephali, see p. 179.) At Monte Bolca fossil remains are very numerous, belonging to recent genera, Anguilla, Sphagebranchus, and Ophichthys ; even larval Leptocephales have been preserved. Anguilla has been found also in the chalk of Aix and Oeningen. In the majority of the species the branchial openings in the pharynx are wide shits (Murenide platyschiste) ; in others, the true Murene, (Ilurenide engyschiste) they are narrow. NeEmMIcHTHYS.—Exceedingly elongate, band-shaped ; tail taper- ing into a point. Vent approximate to the pectorals, but the abdominal cavity extending far behind the vent. Jaws produced into a long slender bill, the upper part being formed by the vomer and intermaxillaries. The imner surface of the bill covered with small tooth-like asperities. Eye large. The nostrils of each side are close together, in a hollow before the eye. Gull- openings wide, nearly confluent. Pectoral and vertical fins well developed. This very singular type is a deep-sea form, occurring at depths of from 500 to 2500 fathoms. The two species known have hitherto been found in the Atlantic only. CyrmMa.—This genus combines the form of the snout of Nemichthys, with the soft and shorter body of a Leptocephalus ; but the gill-openings are very narrow and close together on the abdominal surface. Vent in about the middle of the length of the body; vertical fins well developed, confined to, and sur- rounding, the tail. Pectoral fins well developed. Eye very small. Known from two specimens only, 44 inches lone, dredged in depths of 1500 and 1800 fathoms in the Pacific and Antarctic Oceans. SACCOPHARYNX.—Deep-sea Congers, with the muscular system very feebly developed, with the bones very thin, soft, and EELS. 671 wanting in inorganic matter. Head and gape enormous. Snout very short, pointed, flexible, like an appendage overlapping the gape. Maxillary and mandibulary bones very thin, slender, arched, armed with one or two series of long, slender, curved, widely set teeth, their points being directed inwards; palate toothless. Guill-openings wide, at some distance from the head, at the lower part of the sides; gills very narrow, free, and ex- posed. Trunk of moderate length. Stomach distensible in an extraordinary degree. Vent at the end of the trunk. Tail band- like, exceedingly long, tapering in a very fine filament. Pectoral small, present. Dorsal and anal fins rudimentary. This is another extraordinary form of Deep-sea Eels; the muscular system, except on the head, is very feebly developed ; the bones are as thin, soft, and wanting in inorganic matter, as in the Trachypteride. This fish is known from three specimens only, which have been found floating on the sur- face of the North Atlantic, with their stomachs much dis- tended, having swallowed some other fish, the weight of which many times exceeded that of their destroyer. © It attains to the length of several feet. SYNAPHOBRANCHUS.—Gill-openings ventral, united into a longitudinal slit between the pectoral fins, separate internally. Pectoral and vertical fins well developed. Nostrils lateral, the anterior subtubular, the posterior round, before the lower half of the eye. Cleft of the mouth very wide ; teeth small; body scaly. Stomach very distensible. Deep-sea Congers, with well-developed muscular system, spread over all oceans, and occurring in depths of from 345 to 2000 fathoms. Four species are known. Probably attaining to the same length as the Conger. ANGUILLA.—Small scales imbedded in the skin. Upper jaw not projecting beyond the lower. Teeth small, forming bands. Gill-openings narrow, at the base of the pectoral fins. The dorsal fin commences at a considerable distance from the occiput. Some twenty-five species of “Eels” are known from the freshwaters and coasts of the temperate and tropical zones ; 672 FISHES. none have been found in South America or the west coast of North America and West Africa. The following are the most note-worthy : The common European species (A. anguilla) is spread over Europe to 64° 30’ lat. N., and all round the Mediterranean area, but is not found either in the Danube or in the Black and Caspian Seas; it extends across the Atlantic to North America. The form of the snout varies much, and some naturalists have believed that specimens with a broad and obtuse snout were specifically distinct from those with pointed snout. However, every degree of breadth of the snout may be observed; and a much safer way of recognizing this species, and distinguishing it from other European Eels, is the forward position of the dorsal fin; the distance between the commencement of the dorsal and anal fins being as long as, or somewhat longer than, the head. Eels grow generally to a length of about three feet, but the capture of much larger examples is on record. Their mode of propagation is still unknown. So much only is certain that they do not spawn in fresh water, that many full-grown individuals, but not all, descend rivers during the winter months, and that some of them at least must spawn in brackish water or in deep rater in the sea; for in the course of the summer young individuals from three to five inches long ascend rivers in incredible numbers, overcoming all obstacles, ascending verti- cal walls or floodgates, entering every larger and smaller tributary, and making their way even over terra firma to waters shut off from all communication with rivers. Such immigra- tions have been long known by the name of “ Hel-fairs.” The majority of the Eels which migrate to the sea appear to return to fresh water, but not in a body, but irregularly, and through- out the warmer part of the year. No naturalist has ever observed these fishes in the act of spawning, or found mature ova; and the organs of reproduction of individuals caught in fresh water are so little developed and so much alike, that EELS. 673 the female organ can be distinguished from the male only with the aid of a microscope. The second species found in Great Britain, on the coasts of Europe generally, in China, New Zealand, and the West Indies, is (A. latirostris) the “ Grig” or “ Glut,” which prefers the neighbourhood of the sea to distant mland-waters, and in which the dorsal fin begins farther backwards, the distance between the commencement of the dorsal and anal fins being shorter than the head; its snout seems to be always broad. On the American side of the Atlantic other species, beside A. anguilla are found in abundance: A. bostontensis, A. texana. The largest Eels occur in lakes of the islands of the Indo- Pacific, and they play a conspicuous part in the mythology of the South-Sea Islanders and Maories; individuals of from eight to ten feet in length have been seen, and referred to several species, as A. mauritiana, fidjiensis, obscura, aneitensis, etc. ConcER.—Scaleless. Cleft of the mouth wide, extending at least to below the middle of the eye. Maxillary and mandibu- lary teeth arranged in series, one of which contains teeth of equal size, and so closely set as to form a cutting edge. No canine teeth. Vomerine band of teeth short. Pectoral and vertical fins well developed, the dorsal commencing behind the root of the pectoral. Gill-openings large, approximate to the abdomen. The posterior nostril opposite to the upper or middle part of the orbit, the anterior in a tube. Eyes well developed. The “Congers” are marine Eels ; the best known species (C. conger) seems to be almost cosmopolitan, and is plentiful all round Europe, at St. Helena, in Japan, and Tasmania. It attains to a length of eight feet, and thrives and grows rapidly even in confinement, which is not the case with the fresh- water Eel. Three other species are known, of which @. marginatus from the Indian Ocean, is the most common. Leptocephalus morrisii is an abnormal larval condition of the Conger. DEX 674 FISHES. Genera allied to Conger are Poeciloconger, Congromurena, Vroconger, and Heteroconger. Mur&NESOX. —Scaleless. Snout produced. Jaws with several series of small closely set teeth, anteriorly with canines ; vomer with several long series of teeth, the middle of which is formed by large conical or compressed teeth. Gill-openings wide, approximate to the abdomen. Pectoral and vertical fins well developed, the dorsal beginning above the gill-opening. Two pairs of nostrils, the posterior opposite to the upper part or middle of the eye. Four species from tropical seas, JZ. cinereus being very common in the Indian Ocean, and attaining to a length of six feet. NETTASTOMA.—Scaleless. Snout much produced, depressed. Jaws and vomer with bands of card-like teeth, those along the median line of the vomer being somewhat the larger. Vertical fins well developed ; pectorals none. Gill-openings of moderate width, open. Nostrils on the upper surface of the head, valvular ; the anterior near to the end of the snout, the posterior above the anterior angle of the eye. This genus lives at some depth, the Japanese species (N. parviceps) having been obtained at 345 fathoms. J. melanurum from the Mediterranean, seems to inhabit a similar depth. Hyoprorus is its Leptocephalid form. Genera allied to Murenesox are Sawrenchelys, Oxyconger, Hoplunnis, and Neoconger ; in all these the nostrils have a superior or lateral position. In other genera the nostrils perforate the upper lip, as in Myrus, Myrophis, Paramyrus, Chilorhinus, Murenichthys, and Ophichthys, the last genus deserving of particular mention on account of its great range and common occurrence. OpHicHtHys.—Nostrils labial; extremity of the tail free, not surrounded by a fin. More than eighty species are known, many of which are EELS. 675 abundant on the coasts of the tropical and sub-tropical zones. They do not attain to a large size, but many must be ex- tremely voracious and destructive to other fishes, if we draw an inference from the formidable dentition with which their jaws and palate is armed. Other species have much more feeble, and some even obtuse teeth, better adapted for seizing Crustaceans than vigorous and slippery fishes. Some have rudimentary pectoral fins or lack them altogether. Many are highly ornamented with bands or spots, the coloration being apparently very constant in the several species. a a a Fig. 303.—Ophichthys crocodilinus, from the Indo-Pacific. Morincua.— Body scaleless, cylindrical, with the trunk much longer than the tail. Pectorals none or small ; vertical fins but little developed, limited to the tail. Posterior nostrils in front of the small eye. Cleft of the mouth narrow ; teeth uniserial, Heart placed far behind the branchiz. Gill-openings rather narrow, inferior. Six species from freshwaters, brackish water, and the coasts of India to the Fiji Islands. Mur&NA.—Scaleless. Teeth well developed. Gill-openings and clefts between the branchial arches narrow. Pectoral fins none; dorsal and anal fins well developed. Two nostrils on each side of the upper surface of the snout; the posterior a narrow round foramen, with or without tube; the anterior in a tube. 676 FISHES, The Murenas are as abundantly represented in the tropical and sub-tropical zones, and have nearly the same range, as Ophichthys. 'The number of species known exceeds eighty. The majority are armed with formidable pointed teeth, well suited for seizing other fish on which they prey. Large specimens thus armed readily attack persons in and out of the water; and as some species attain a length of some six or eight feet, they are justly feared by fishermen. The minority of species have obtuse and molar-like teeth, their food consisting chiefly of Crustaceans and other hard-shelled Fig. 304.—Head of a Mureena. animals. Most of the Murenas are beautifully coloured and Fig. 305.—Murena pavonina, from Southern Seas. spotted, some in a reeular and constant manner, whilst in others the pattern varies in a most irregular fashion: they have quite the appearance of snakes. The Murena of the MURZENAS, 677 Ancient Romans is Murena helena, which is not confined to the Mediterranean, but also found in the Indian Ocean and on the coast of Australia. Its skin is of a rich brown, beauti- fully marked with large yellowish spots, each of which con- tains smaller brown spots. Fig. 306.—Murena picta, from the Indo-Pacific. Gymnomurena differs from Murena in having the fins reduced to a short rudiment near the end of the tail. Six Fig. 307.—Gymnomurena vittata, from Cuba. species are known growing to a length of eight feet. Myroconger and Enchelycore belong to the same sub-family 678 _ FISHES. as Murena, but the former is provided with pectoral fins, and in the latter the posterior nostril is a long slit, and not round as in the other genera. FIFTH ORDER—LOPHOBRANCHII. The gills are not laminated, but composed of small rounded lobes attached to the branchial arches. Gull-cover reduced to a Fig. 308.—Gills of Hippocampus abdominalis. large simple plate. Avr-bladder simple, without pnewmatie duct. A dermal skeleton composed of numerous pieces arranged im segments, replaces more or less soft integuments. Muscular system not much developed. Snout prolonged. Mouth terminal, small, toothless, formed as in Acanthopterygians. First FAMILY—SOLENOSTOMID&. Gill-openings wide. Two dorsal fins, the rays of the anterior not articulated. All the other fins well developed. One living genus only is known, which was preceded in the tertiary epoch by Solenorhynchus (Monte Postale). SoLENOSTOMA.—Snout produced into a long tube. Body compressed, with very short tail. All parts covered with thin skin, below which there is a dermal skeleton formed by large star-like ossifications. The soft dorsal and anal fins on elevated bases ; caudal fin long. Ventral fins inserted opposite to the PIPE-FISHES. 679 anterior dorsal, close together, seven-rayed ; they are free in the male, but in the female their inner side coalesces with the in- teguments of the body, a large pouch for the reception of the eggs being formed thereby. Air-bladder and pseudobranchiz absent. Branchiostegals four, very thin. Intestinal tract very simple, with a stomachic dilatation, without pylorie appendages. Ova very small. The dermal skeleton of this singular type is formed by star-like ossifications, four in each horizontal and vertical series on the side of the fore part of the trunk; each consists of four or three radiating branches by which it joins the neighbouring bones; on the hind part of the trunk and tail the series are diminished to two. The dorsal and abdominal profiles in front of the fins are protected by similar bones. The vertebral column is composed of eighteen abdominal and fifteen caudal vertebrae, the vertebree gradually decreasing in length backwards, so that the shortness of the tail is caused not only by the smaller number of vertebrae, but also by their much lesser length. Neural and hemal spines are developed. The pelvis consists of two pairs of cartilaginous lamine, the convex margin of the anterior fitting into an angle of a dermal bone which separates the pelvis from the well-ossified humeral arch. The singular provision for the retention and protection of the eggs has been described above (p. 162, figs. 73 and 74), and we have only to repeat here that it is the female which takes care of the progeny, and not the male as in the follow- ing family. ‘Two or three small species are known from the Indian Ocean; they are beautifully marked, especially the male, which also appears to be of smaller size in this genus than the female. SECOND FAMILY—SYNGNATHIDA. Gill-openings reduced to a very small opening near the upper posterior angle of the gill-cover. One soft dorsal fin ; no 680 FISHES. ventrals, and, sometimes, one or more of the other fins are also absent. Small marine fishes, which are abundant on such parts of the coasts of the tropical and temperate zones as offer by their vegetation shelter to these defenceless creatures. They are bad swimmers (the dorsal fin being the principal organ of locomotion), and frequently and resistlessly carried by cur- rents into the open ocean or to distant coasts. All enter brackish water, some fresh water. The strata of Monte Bolca and Licata (Sicily) have yielded evidence of their existence in the tertiary epochs; beside species of Siphonostoma and Syngnathus (Pseudosyngnathus), remains of an extinct genus, Calamostoma, allied to Hippocampus, but with a distinct caudal fin, have been found. On their propagation see p. 163, Fig. 76. A. SYNGNATHINA.—The tail is not prehensile, and generally provided with a caudal fin.—Pipe-Fishes. SIPHONOSTOMA.—Body with distinct ridges, the upper caudal ridge continuous with the lateral line, but not with the dorsal ridge of the trunk. Pectoral and caudal fins well developed ; dorsal fin of moderate length, opposite to the vent. Humeral bones movable, not united into a “breast-ring.” Males with an egg-pouch on the tail, the eggs being covered by cutaneous folds. Two species, of which S. typhle is common on the British, and generally distributed on the European coasts. SYNGNATHUS.—Body with the ridges more or less distinct, the dorsal ridge of the trunk not being continuous with that of the tail. Pectoral fins well developed ; caudal present. Dorsal fin opposite or near to the vent. Humeral bones firmly united into the breast-ring. Egg-pouch as in Siphonostoma. The distribution of this genus nearly coincides with that of the family, some fifty species being known. SS. acus, the great Pipe-fish (see Fig. 75, p. 163), is one of the most common European fishes, extending across the Atlantic and PIPE-FISHES. 681 southwards to the Cape of Good Hope; it attains a length of 18 inches. Another very common species, frequently met at sea, and spread over nearly all the tropical and sub-tropical seas, is S. pelagicus, agreeably marked with alternate brown and silvery cross-bars. DoryicHTHys.—Body with the ridges well developed. Pec- . toral and caudal fins present. Dorsal fin long or of moderate length, opposite to the vent. Humeral bones firmly united. Males with the lower ridges of the abdomen dilated, the dilated parts forming a broad groove for the reception of the ova. In these Pipe-fishes the ova are not received in a com- pletely closed pouch, but glued on to the surface of the abdomen. ‘Twenty species from tropical seas. NeErRopHIS,—Body smooth, rounded, with scarcely any of the ridges distinct. Pectoral fin none, caudal absent or rudimentary, the tail tapering into a point. Dorsal fin of moderate length, opposite to the vent. The ova are attached to the soft integu- ment of the abdomen of the male, and are not covered by lateral folds of the skin. Seven species from the European seas and the Atlantic. NV. wequoreus (Ocean Pipe-fish), N. ophidion (Straight-nosed Pipe-fish), and WV. lumbriciformis (Little Pipe-fish), are common on the British coasts. ProrocaAmMpus.—The whole dermal skeleton is covered with skin. A broad cutaneous fold runs along the back in front and behind the dorsal ; a similar fold along the abdomen. Pectoral fin none ; caudal very small. The single species of this remarkable genus, P. hymeno- lomus, occurs in the Falkland Islands. It may be regarded as an embryonal form of Nerophis, the median skin-folds being evidently remains of the fringe which surrounds the body of the embryo. The other genera belonging to this group are, Jchthyo- campus, Nannocampus, Urocampus, Leptoichthys, Coelonotus, and Stigmatophora. 682 FISHES. HippocaMPInA.—The tail is prehensile, and invariably with- out caudal fin.—Sea-horses. GASTROTOKEUS.—Body depressed, the lateral line running along the margin of the abdomen. Shields smooth. Tail shorter than the body. Pectoral fins. No pouch is developed for the ova, which are imbedded in the soft integument of the abdomen of the male. Gastrotokeus biaculeatus,. very common in the Indian Ocean to the coasts of Australia. SOLENOGNATHUS.—Body compressed, deeper than broad. Shields hard, rugose, with round or oval interannular plates ; and without elongate processes. Tail shorter than the body. Pectoral fins. Three species, from the Chinese and Australian Seas ; they are the largest of Lophobranchs, S. hardwickiw, attaining to a length of nearly two feet. PHYLLOPTERYX.—Body compressed, or as broad as deep. Shields smooth, but some or ali of them are provided with pro- Fig. 309.—Phyllopteryx eques. minent spines or processes on the edges of the body ; some of the processes with cutaneous filaments. A pair of spines on the upper side of the snout and above the orbit. Tail about as long as the body. Pectoral fins. The ova are imbedded in soft mem- PIPE-FISHES. 683 brane on the lower side of the tail, without a pouch being developed. Three species from the coasts of Australia. The protective resemblances with which many Lophobranchs are furnished, attain to the highest degree of development in the fishes of this genus. Not only their colour closely assimilates that of the particular kind of seaweed which they frequent, but the appendages of their spines seem to be merely part of the fucus to which they are attached. They attain a length of 12 inches. HippocaAMpus.—Trunk compressed, more or less elevated. Shields with more or less prominent tubercles or spines. Occiput compressed into a crest, terminating at its supero-posterior corner in a prominent knob (coronet). Pectoral fins. The males carry the eggs in a sac at the base of the tail, opening near the vent. A singular resemblance of the head and fore part of the body to that of a horse, has given to these fishes the name of “Sea-horses.” They are abundant between and near the tropics, becoming scarcer in higher latitudes. Some twenty species are known, some of which have a wide geographical range, as they are often carried to great distances with floating objects to which they happen to be attached—Acentronura is a genus closely allied to Hippocampus. SIXTH ORDER—PLECTOGNATHL Teleosteous fishes with rough scales, or with ossifications of the cutis in the form of scutes or spines ; skin sometimes entirely naked. Skeleton incompletely ossified, with the vertebre in small number. Gills pectinate ; a narrow gill-opening in front of the pectoral fins. Mouth narrow ; the bones of the upper jaw generally firmly united. A soft dorsal fin, belonging to the caudal portion of the vertebral column, opposite to the anal ; sometimes elements of a spinous dorsal besides. Ventral fin none, or reduced to spines. Arr-bladder without pneumatic duct. 684 FISHES. First FAMILY—SCLERODERMI. Snout somewhat produced ; jaws armed with distinet teeth in small number, Skin with scutes or rough. The elements of a spinous dorsal and ventral fins generally present. Marine fishes of moderate or small size, very common in the tropical zone, but scarcer in higher latitudes. They have been found in three localities of tertiary strata, viz., at Monte Bolca, where a species of Ostracion occurs, and in the Schists of Glaris, from which two genera have been described, Acan- thoderma and Acanthopleurus, closely allied to Balistes and Triacanthus. Glyptocephalus from the Isle of Sheppey has the skull of a Balistes, but its body is covered with tuber- cles arranged in regular series. The Scleroderms may be divided into three very natural groups :— A. TRIACANTHINA.—The skin is covered with small, rough, scalelike scutes. A spinous dorsal fin with from four to six spines. Micropus, 416 Microstoma, 650 Miller’s-thumb, 476 Minnow, 596, 599 Minous, 417 Misgurnus, 604 Misheup, 408 Mitchell, 17 Mixogamous, 177 Mollienesia, 617 Molva, 544 Monacanthus, 684 Monk-fish, 334 Monocentris, 421 Monocirrhus, 418 Monopterus, 669 Moon-eye, 653 Mora, 541 Mordacia, 693 Moringua, 675 Mormyrops, 626 Mormyrus, 625 Mossbanker, 659 Motella, 544 Mouth, 37, 123 Moxostoma, 589 Mud-fish, 372, 619 Mugil, 501 Miller, H., 33 Miiller, J., 22, 32, 33 Miiller, O. F., 13 Miller, W., 33 Mullidae, 403 Mulloides, 404 Mullus, 404 Munro, 16 Murena, 675 Mureenesox, 674 Murenichthys, 674 Murenolepis, 545 Murray-Cod, 392 Muscles, 93 Muskellunge, 624 Mustelus, 318 Mylesinus, 613 Myletes, 613 Myliobatis, 344 Mylocyprinus, 588 Myloleucus, 601 Mylopharodon, 601 Myology, 93 Myriacanthus, 314 Myriodon, 383 Myriolepis, 370 Myripristis, 423 Myroconger, 677 Myrophis, 674 Myrus, 674 Mystacoleucus, 598 Myxine, 695 Myxodes, 498 Myxus, 504 Nanpus, 418 Nanneethiops, 610 Nannobrachium, 587 Nannocampus, 681 Nannocharax, 608 Nannostomus, 607 Narcine, 340 Naseus, 438, 440 Nauclerus, 446 Naucrates, 444 Nautichthys, 480 Nealotus, 434 Nearctic region, 246 Nebris, 431 Nebrius, 326 Neetroplus, 536 Nefasch, 612 Nemacanthus, 314 Nemachilus, 605 Nemadactylus, 412 Nematogenys, 581 Nematops, 557 Nematoptychius, 370 Nemichthys, 670 Nemophis, 498 Nemopteryx, 434, 539 Neochanna, 624 Neoclinus, 498 Neoconger, 674 Neophrynichthys, 469 Neotropical region, 233 Nerfling, 599 Nerophis, 681 Nerves, 103 Nesiarchus, 434 Nettastoma, 674 Neural arches, 85 Neural spine, 52 Neurapophyses, 51 Neurology, 96 Neuroskeleton, 85 New Zealand sub-region, 248 Nictitating 113 Nilsson, 27 Niphon, 397 Nomeide, 455 Nomeus, 456 Nonnat, 501 Nordmann, 28 North American district, 266 North 246 North Atlantic, 262 Northern temperate zone, 262 Northern zone, 240 North Pacitic, 268 Nostrils, 37, 109 Notacanthus, 523 Notidanus, 325 Notochord, 63 Notoglanis, 569 Notograptus, 498 Notopterus, 665 Notothenia, 466 Noturus, 568 Novacula, 529 Nummopalatus, 526 Nuria, 598 Nutrition, organs of, 121 membrane, American region, OaR-FISH, 522 Oblata, 406 Occipital, 56 ‘ Ochetobius. 602 Odax, 532 Odontaspis, 321 Odonteus, 525 Odontostomus, 587 Oil-sardine, 660 Old Red Sandstone, 194 Old wife, 406 Olfactory lobes, 97 Olfactory organ, 109 Oligorus, 392 Oligosarcus, 611 Olistherops, 533 Ombre, 429 INDEX. Ombre chevalier, 645 Omentum, 132 Onchus, 314 Oncorhynchus, 646 Oneirodes, 473 Oolithic fishes, 199 Opercular gill, 138 Operculum, 38, 54, 91 Ophichthys, 674 Ophidiidee, 546 Ophidium, 549 Ophiocephalide, 513 Ophiodon, 491 Ophiopsis, 368 Opisthognathus, 466 Opisthopteryx, 656 Opisthoticum, 88 Opsariichthys, 602 Optic lobes, 97 Oracanthus, 314 Orbito sphenoid, 57, 88 Oreinus, 595 Oreonectes, 606 Orestias, 615 Orfe, 599 Orthacanthus, 334 Orthagoriscus, 690 Orthodon, 601 Orthostomus, 489 Osbeck, 13 Osmeroides, 582, 631 Osmerus, 646 Os operculare, 91 Osphromenus, 517 Osteobrama, 604 Osteochilus, 596 Osteogeniosus, 569 Osteoglossum, 654 Osteolepis, 365 Ostracion, 686 Os transversum, 56 Otolith, 116 Otolithus, 430 Oulachon, 647 Ovaries, 158, 166 Ovum, 158, 159, 167 Owen, 33 Oxuderces, 489 Oxyconger, 674 Oxydoras, 572 Oxygnathus, 370 Oxymetopon, 489 Oxyrhina, 320 Oxytes, 319 PACHYCORMUS, 368 Pachymetopon, 406 Pachyurus, 430 Pagellus, 408 715 Pagrus, 408 Paired fins, 42 Palearctic region, 243 Paleichthyes, 312 Paleogadus, 539 Paleoniscide, 369 Paleorhynchus, 437 Paleoscyllium, 326 Palwospinax, 330 Palatine, 56, 90 Palatine arch, 55 Palimphyes, 457 Pallas, 13 Pammelas, 447 Pancreas, 133 Pangasius, 566 Pantodon, 653 Papilla urogenitalis, 156 Paracanthobrama, 598 Paradiplomystax, 569 Paradise-fish, 517 Paragoniates, 610 Paralepis, 585 Paralichthys, 556 Paramisgurnus, 606 Paramyrus, 674 Paraperca, 375 Paraphoxinus, 601 Parapophyses, 51 Parascopelus, 582 Parascyllium, 326 Parasphenoid, 56, 89 Pardachirus, 558 Paretroplus, 535 Parietals, 57, 89 Pariodon, 581 Parker, 32 Parma, 525 Parnell, 27 Paroccipital, 56, 88 Parodon, 607 Parophrys, 557 Paropsis, 450 Parra, 13 Parr-marks, 631 Parrot-wrasses, 530 Patzcus, 497 Patagonian district, 289 Peal, 644 Pectoral arch, 92 Pectoral fins, 42 Pediculati, 469 Pegasus, 482 Pelagic fishes, 292 Pelamys, 459 Pelargorhynchus, 666 Pelecus, 604 Pelerin, 322 Pellona, 660 716 Pellonula, 660 Pelor, 417 Pelotrophus, 604 Peltorhamphus, 557 Pempheris, 425 Pennant, 13 Pentaceros, 397 Pentanemus, 425 Pentapus, 390 Pentaroge, 417 Perea, 375 Percalabrax, 378 Perch, 375 Percichthys, 376 Percide, 375 Percilia, 397 Percis, 464 Percophis, 466 Percopsis, 651 Periophthalmus, 487 Peristethus, 481 Permian fishes, 197 Peruvian district, 280 Pesce Rey, 501 Petalopteryx, 480 Petenia, 536 Peters, 31 Petrodus, 329 Petromyzon, 692 Petrosal, 56 Petroscirtes, 494 Phaneropleuridie, 360 Pharyngeal bones, 58 Pharyngognathi, 523 Pholidichthys, 498 Pholidophorus, 368 Photichthys, 629 Phractocephalus, 56 5 Phrynorhombus, 555 Phycis, 543 Phyllodus, 526 Phyllopteryx, 682 Physiculus, 543 Physostomi, 559 Piabuca, 610 Piabucina, 610 Pickerell, 624 Pike, 624 Pike-perch, 378 Pilchard, 660 Pileoma, 379 Pilot-fish, 444 Pimelepterus, 410 Pimelodus, 568 Pimephales, 596 Pinguipes, 466 Pipe-fishes, 680 Piramutana, 568 Piratinga, 568 INDEX. Pirinampus, 569 Piso, 7 Pituitary gland, 98 Placodermi, 351 Placoid scales, 48 Plagiostomata, 313 Plagiotremus, 498 Plagusia, 559 Plagyodus, 586 Plaice, 557 Pla-kat, 519 Platax, 448 Platinx, 656 Platycephalus, 477 Platycornus, 421 Platyglossus, 529 Platynematichthys, 566 Platypoecilus, 618 Platyptera, 489 Platyrhina, 342 Platysomide, 370 Platystethus, 450 Platystoma, 568 Platystomatichthys, 568 Platytroctes, 664 Playfair, 29 Plecoglossus, 646 Plecostomus, 576 Plectropoma, 382 Plesiops, 418 Pleurapophyses, 52 Pleurolepide, 366 Pleuronectes, 557 Pleuronectidee, 553 Pleuropholis, 368 Plinthophorus, 666 Plionemus, 442 Plotosus, 563 Podabrus, 480 Podocys, 421 Poecilia, 617 Poeciloconger, 674 Poecilopsetta, 557 Poey, F., 31 Pogonias, 427 Poisonous fishes, 189 Poisson bleu, 650 Pollack, 541 Pollan, 649 Polyacanthus, 516 Polycaulus, 480 Polycentrus, 418 Polyipnus, 628 Polymixia, 423 Polynemus, 425 Polyodontide, 362 Polyprion, 582 Polypteroidei, 363 Polypterus, 364 Polyrhizodus, 330 Pomacanthus, 401 Pomacentrus, 525 Pomatomus, 395 Pomotis, 396 Pompilus, 444 Pope, 378 Porbeagle, 320 Porgy, 408 Porichthys, 468 Portheus, 500 Porthmeus, 446 Port Jackson Shark, 330 Porus abdominalis, 123 Porus genitalis, 123, 158 Post-clavicula, 59, 92 Post-frontal bone, 57, 89 Post-pliocene fishes, 201 Post-temporal, 59, 92 Pout, 541 Powen, 649 Preoperculum, 38, 54, 90 Preorbital, 54 Prefrontal, 57, 89 Premaxillary, 53, 90 Premnas, 525 Prefiadillas, 575 Pretympanic, 55 Priacanthus, 395 Pride, 693 Prionotus, 479 Prionurus, 440 Pristacanthus, 314 Pristidae, 336 Pristigaster, 660 Pristiophorus, 335 Pristipoma, 385 Pristis, 337 Pristiurus, 326 Prochilodus, 607 Prooticum, 88 Propterus, 368 Propterygium, 70 Prosencephalon, 97 Prosopodasys, 417 Protamia, 372 Protocampus, 681 Protopterus, 356 Protosphyrena, 500 Prototroctes, 652 ~ Prussian carp, 591 Psaliodus, 349 Psammobatis, 342 Psammodiscus, 557 Psammodus, 329 Psammoperca, 378 Psenes, 456 Psephurus, 363 Psettichthys, 556 Psettodes, 554 Psettus, 447 Pseudecheneis, 580 Pseudeutropius, 566 Pseudobagrus, 567 Pseudoberyx, 421 Pseudoblennius, 498 Pseudobranchix, 140 Pseudochalceus, 610 Pseudochilinus, 530 Pseudochromis, 466 Pseudodax, 530 Pseudoeleginus, 462 Pseudogobio, 596 Pseudojulis, 529 Pseudolabuea, 604 Pseudoperilampus, 601 Pseudophycis, 542 Pseudoplesiops, 466 Pseudorasbora, 596 Pseudorhombus, 556 Pseudoscarus, 532 Pseudosyngnathus, 680 Pseudovomer, 442 Pseudoxiphophorus, 617 Psilorhynchus, 604 Psychrolutes, 469 Pteraclis, 455 Pteragogus, 530 Pteraspis, 354 Pterichthys, 351 Pteroplatea, 344 Pteridium, 549 Pterois, 415 Pterophyllum, 537 Pteropsarion, 602 Pterygocephalus, 492 Pterygoid, 56 Pterygoplichthys, 576 Ptychacanthus, 314 Ptychobarbus, 595 Ptychodus, 330 Ptycholepis, 368 Ptyonotus, 480 Pycnodontide, 366 Pygopterus, 370 Pyloric appendages, 131 Pyrrhulina, 607 QUADRATE Bonz, 55, 89 Quoy et Gaimard, 26 Raptus, 59 Raja, 340 Raniceps, 544 Rasbora, 597 Rasborichthys, 604 Rathke, 32 Ray, 8 Rays of fins, 40 INDEX. Rays, 335, 341 Red bodies, 147 Red-dace, 599 Red-eye, 599 Red-fin, 599 Red-horse, 589 Red mullet, 404 Regalecus, 522 Reproduction of lost parts, 188 Reproduction, organs of, 157 Respiration, organs of, 135 Rete mirabile, 147 Retropinna, 647 Retzius, 32 Rhabdolepis, 370 Rhacolepis, 421 Rhadinichthys, 370 Rhamphichthys, 666 Rhamphocottus, 480 Rhamphosus, 507 Rhina, 334 Rhinelepis, 576 Rhinellus, 656 Rhinichthys, 596 Rhinobatus, 338 Rhinodon, 323 Rhinodoras, 572 Rhinoglanis, 573 Rhinonus, 549 Rhinoptera, 346 Rhizodus, 365 Rhodeus, 601 Rhomboidichthys, 556 Rhombosolea, 557 Rhombus, 555 Rhynchichthys, 424 Rhynchobatus, 337 Rhynchobdella, 498 Rhynchodus, 349 Rhypticus, 383 Rhytiodus, 608 Rib, 52 Ribbon-fishes, 520 Richardson, 27, 28 Risso, 17 Rita, 567 Rivulus, 615 Roach, 599, 600 Rock-cook, 528 Rockling, 544 Rohteichthys, 597 Rondelet, 5 Rosenthal, 32 Rough Dab, 555 Rudd, 599 Ruppell, 29 Russel, 16 Saccartus, 474 Saccobranchus, 565 Saccodon, 607 Saccopharynx, 670 Selbling, 645 Sail-fish, 589 Sail-flUuke, 555 Salanx, 650 Salarias, 494 Salivary glands, 124 Salminus, 611 Salmo, 631 Salmon, 644 Salmon-trout, 644 Salvelini, 645 Salviani, 5 Samaris, 556 Sand-eel, 550 Sand-piper, 693 Sandy Ray, 341 Sar, 406 Saragu, 406 Sareodaces, 611 Sardine, 660 Sargina, 406 Sargo, 406 Sargodon, 405 Sargus, 406 Satanoperca, 537 Saurenchelys, 674 Saurichthys, 365 Saurida, 582 Sauride, 368 Saurocephalus, 500 Saurodipteride, 355 Saurodontide, 500 Saurorhamphus, 666 Saurus, 582 Saury, 620 Saw-fishes, 337 Scabbard-fish, 435 Seald-fish, 556 Seales, 45 Scaphaspis, 354 Scaphirhynchus, 362 Scapula, 59, 92 Scapular arch, 59 Scarichthys, 531 Scarus, 526, 530 Scatharus, 406 Seatophagus, 401 Schacra, 602 Schal, 573 Schedophilus, 455 Schell-fisch, 540 Schelly, 649 Schilbe, 566 Schilbichthys, 566 Schizopygopsis, 595 717 718 Schizothorax, 595 Schlegel, 29 Schneider, 15 Schultze, 33 Sciades, 568 Scizna, 429 Scizvnide, 426 Scissor, 610 Sclerodermi, 684 Sclerognathus, 589 Scolopsis, 889 Scomber, 457 Scombresox, 620 Scombridee, 456 Scombroclupea, 656 Scombrops, 395 Scopelide, 582 Scopelosaurus, 587 Scopelus, 584 Scorpena, 444 Scorpenichthys, 480 Scorpenide, 412 Scorpis, 402 Scup, 408 Seylliodus, 326 Scylium, 325 Scymnus, 332 Sea-bat, 448 Seabream, 405, 408 Sea-cat, 493 Sea-devil, 344, 470 Sea-hedgehog, 687 Sea-horses, 682 Sea-perch, 381 Seatserpents, 521 Sea-trout, 644 Sea-wolf, 493 Seba, 9 Sebastes, 413 Secondary sexual acters, 176 Seingo, 378 Selache, 322 Selachoidei, 314 Semicossyphus, 530 Semionotus, 368 Semiophorus, 441, 442 Semiplotus, 598 Seriola, 444 Seriolella, 444, 450 Seriolichthys, 444 Serranus, 381 Serrasalmo, 613 Setiform teeth, 126 Sewin, 644 Sexual characters, 176 Shad, 659 Shagreen, 315 Shagreen Skate, 341 char- INDEX. Sharks, 314 Shark’s fins, 315 Sheep’s head, 406 Shiner, 599, 603 Shore-fishes, 257 Sicyases, 513 Sicydium, 487 Siebold, 28 Sillago, 464 Silondia, 566 Siluranodon, 566 Silurian fishes, 193 Silurichthys, 566 Siluridie, 559 Silurus, 565 Siniperca, 376 Sinus rhomboidalis, 99 Siphagonus, 481 Siphonal stomach, 130 Siphonognathus, 533 Siphonostoma, 680 Sirembo, 549 Sirenide, 355 Sisor, 580 Skate, 341 Skeleton of— Amia, 82 Amphioxus, 63 Chondropterygians, 66 Chondrostei, 74 Cyclostomes, 64 Dipnoi, 71 Ganoids, 71 epidosteus, 80 olypterus, 77 ~ Teleostei, 83 Skin, 45 Skip-jack, 447 Skipper, 620 Skull, 51, 85 Skulpin, 489 Smaris, 390 Smear-dab, 557 Smelt, 647 Smerdis, 375 Smiliogaster, 604 Snapper, 408 Snock, 437 Snout, 37 Solander, 13 Sole, 557 Solea, 557 Solenognathus, 682 Solenorhynchus, 678 Solenostoma, 678 Soleotalpa, 559 Sonnerat, 13 Soricidens, 405 Sorubim, 568 South Australian district, 283 Southern temperate zone, 281 Southern zone, 248 Spaniodon, 656 Sparide, 405 Sparnodus, 405 Sparoid scales, 46 Spathobatis, 338 Spathodactylus, 656 Spatularia, 362 Spawn-eater, 599 Spear-fish, 589 Spherodon, 408 Spherodontide, 368 Sphenacanthus, 314 Sphenocephalus, 421 Sphenodus, 319 Sphenoid, 57 Sphenoideum anterius, 89 Sphyrena, 499 Sphyrvenodus, 500 Spiegel-Karpfen, 591 Spinacide, 330 Spinal chord, 96 Spinal column, 51 Spinax, 352 Spines of fins, 40 Spiracles, 138 Spiral valve, 128 Spirobranchus, 516 Splanchnoskeleton, 85 Spleen, 133 Splenial, 54, 91 Sprat, 659 Spratelloides, 662 Squaliobarbus, 602 Squaloraja, 335 Squamipinnes, 397 Squamosal, 88, 89 Stannius, 32, 33 Stare-gazer, 462 Starry Ray, 341 Stegophilus, 581 Stegostoma, 326 Steindachner, 28 Steller, 13 Stenostoma, 421 Sterlet, 361 Sternarchus, 666 Sternoptyx, 627 Sternopygus, 667 Stethojulis, 529 Sticheopsis, 498 Sticheus, 495 Sticharium, 498 Stickleback, 505 Stigmatophora, 681 Sting Rays, 342 Stock-fish, 540, 542 Stomach, 127 Stomias, 629 Stone-bass, 382 Stone-lugger, 596 Stone-roller, 589 Stone Toter, 596 Storer, 29 Strepsodus, 365 Strinsia, 541 Stromateus, 452 Strophodus, 330 Sturgeons, 361 Stygogenes, 575 Stylodontide, 368 -Stylohyal, 58 Stylophorus, 522 Suboperculum, 38, 55, 91 Suborbital, 91 Sucker, 588 Sucking-fish, 460 Sudis, 586 Sun-fishes, 396, 454, 690 Supraclavicula, 59, 92 Supraoeccipital, 56, 87 Supraorbital, 89 Suprascapula, 59 Supratemporal, 91 Surgeon, 439 Suspensorium of man- dible, 55 Swamimerdam, 7 Sword-fish, 431 Symbranchus, 669 Sympathic nerves, 108 Symphorus, 390 Symphysis, 54 Symphysodon, 537 Symplectic, 55, 89 Sympterygia, 342 Synagris, 390 Synanceia, 416 Synaphobranchus, 671 Synaptura, 558 Syngnathus, 680 Synodontis, 573 TAENIANOTUS, 417 Taeniura, 343 Taractes, 454 Tasmanian subregion, 248 Taste, organ of, 119 Taurinichthys, 526 Tautoga, 527 Teeth, 121, 124 Teleostei, 373 Telescope-fish, 592 Tellia, 615 INDEX. Temera, 340 Temmnodon, 446 Tenacity of life, 186 Tench, 600 Tephraeops, 406 Tephritis, 555 Tertiary fishes, 200 Testicles, 162, 167 Tetragonolepis, 368 Tetragonopterus, 609 Tetragonurus, 501 Tetranematichthys, 572 Tetraroge, 417 Tetrodon, 688 Teuthidide, 418 Teuthis, 419 Thalassophryne, 468 Thalassorhinus, 319 Thaleichthys, 647 Thaumas, 334 Thectodus, 330 Therapon, 385 Tholichthys, 172 Thoracic fins, 42 Thorn-back, 341 Thrissonotus, 370 Thrissopater, 656 Thrissops, 371 Thunberg, 13 Thymallus, 649 Thynnichthys, 595 Thynnus, 457 Thyrsites, 436 Thysanopsetta, 556 Tiger-shark, 327 Tilurus, 180 Tinea, 599 Tongue, 124 Tope, 318 Top-knot, 555 Torgoch, 645 Torpedinide, 338 Torpedo, 339 Torsk, 546 Touch, organ of, 120 Toxabramis, 604 Toxotes, 403 Trachelochismus, 513 Trachelyopterus, 572 Trachichthys, 422 Trachinide, 462 Trachinops, 418 Trachinopsis, 462 Trachinus, 463 Trachurus, 442 Trachynotus, 447 Trachypterus, 522 Transverse line, 50 Triacanthodes, 684 ral Triacanthus, 684 Triacis, 319 Triznodon, 319 Trienophorichthys, 487 Triassic fishes, 197 Trichiurichthys, 434 Trichiuride, 433 Trichiurus, 436 Trichocyclus, 689 Trichodiodon, 689 Trichodon, 466 Trichogaster, 518 Trichomycterus, 581 Trichonotus, 490 Trichopleura, 417 Trifureated Hake, 545 Trigla, 478 Triglops, 480 Trigorhina, 338 Triodon, 687 Tripterodon, 406 Tripterygium, 495 Tristichopterus, 365 Tristychius, 314 Trochocopus, 530 Tropical American region, 233 Trout, 644 Trubu, 660 Trumpeter, 412 Trumpet-fish, 509 Trunk, 39 Trygon, 343 Trygonide, 342 Trygonorhina, 338 Trypauchen, 489 Tunny, 458 Turbinal, 57, 91 Turbot, 555 Twaite Shad, 659 Tyellina, 326 Tylognathus, 596 Typhlichthys, 618 Typhlonus, 548 Uaru, 536 Ulna, 59 Umbra, 429, 619 Umbrina, 428 Umbrine, 429 Undina, 365 Upeneichthys, 404 Upeneoides, 404 Upeneus, 404 Upokororo, 652 Uraleptus, 543 Uranoscopus, 462 Urinary organs, 155 Urocampus, 681 720 Urocentrus, 498 Uroconger, 674 Urogymnus, 343 Urohyal, 58, 91 Urolophus, 343 Uronectes, 538 Uronemus, 360 Urosphen, 507 Urosthenes, 370 Useful fishes, 189 VAILLANT, 31 Valenciennes, 18 Vandellia, 581 Velifer, 397 Vendace, 649 Ventral fins, 42 Vertebral column, 51 Vertical fins, 40 Villiform teeth, 126 Viviparous Blenny, 497 Vogt, 32 INDEX. Vomer (bone), 56, 89 Vomer (gen.), 441 Vulsus, 489 WALLAGo, 566 Wardichthys, 370 Weever, 464 Wels, 565 Whiff, 555 White-bait, 658 White-fish, 599, 648 Whiting, 541 Whiting-pout, 541 Willughby, 8 Wrasses, 525 XENOCEPHALUS, 553 Xenocharax, 612 Xenocypris, 598 Xenodermichthys, 664 Xenomystus, 576 Xenopterus, 688 THE END. Xiphias, 431 Xiphidion, 496 Xiphiide, 431 Xiphochilus, 530 Xiphopterus, 434 Xiphorhampus, 611 Xiphostoma, 611 YARRELL, 27 Yellow-tail, 4 ZANCHUS, 440 Zaniolepis, 491 Zarthe, 603 Zebra-Shark, 327 Zeus, 451 Zoarces, 497 Zope, 603 Zuzuki, 378 Zygaena, 318 Zygapophyses, 52 Zygobatis, 346 Printed by R. & R. Crark, Edinburgh. vie ay ( mien ae fas. ; aia 7 Pe 0 ee al ) “ae 7 : ni fy a ”, 7 ORG hay oe : es, ey" ae : . i Med - ie i * a bi Sv.) Oe api ie : Mt a 7 os Leo nen it a m 7 ie a im is Pe any nae Th .| is oe an 4 ws) ig Rees | i iF . ; i Pole cn nay ae mre an 7 ae ee we ice ar . ay ih ee va “7 pn am > ale ; hi ‘ in ia ia! uy : Sie Trea eet! Oe Bs aa a a i at ae a hae iy i i a f ay i sie hie y a -_ lV Pas ™~ eats it A) ler a Nh Meany hea ai f 1 I H i ; nik f ALAN yo Microformed by Preservation Services mim #5565S, | mun eee Ad ge rs, = AeA ipl aligase 2 Url THe ‘et f: uy ripe Tie if, iV eee tia Bui Ua 244 Laan Van adele ’ pepear »? w oe ee, att Fine pe (cER=e aeaees wont is hh ag (a 7 oi ae: gece i etaShs me Sze wa ~ “ a a to, $hauidmnsg {Apa HH ae ge ars*~ ea F im, c a oe A aa Heel | = Lamy aye a ETN tare ence of pS = 3 a7 a Ay dh ‘ pAt “¢ ~s = tc ce Oe { =25 A | eS: al ry ui 5 hess R ee a Prt =) et 1 WL Adhelal oleh ; ve secnexes ah — Lagsta ati TA | oy Salary een | CRE Te LE Pee i Pt pal ete . Pee “ an Ne _ - yer ra! tatd Bal Ap rch. illite aL Ay ON anes Sa, i eee e! Lo ~— } RAe hee : Pi +t: Ne tq Let A Uw All Nena, le lie Vapefh ip i | = y xe agi pp fe el | on bas an’ Chae he anaes, a7 tye Ose. al WL lot +p e ace ey on 4% 4 on ws \ am a Ee Cn 3 cS -Qrr y aa’ fx ns AN Tals WY AAI vey “My ml. 1> cA, ; mk apm va ay ot 2 Pye ~ y - = Ne A. a> : ie ae Se ‘sa Bae ae So, eS Ea Na ok > We praca . ee cA aw Ene Jo ae ava beg RS ity ame cee; ee fe ie ee es be Gt SS ~~ -_ hae Sees [ep , “a Me Nag: | Tree Ld onl eeianenen, a & ) teal! | |, ; y Rm Are al IVNy - PAO aa... -- Ain aAinn (2 AX AT alah Y | § SP "2A.nnas ¥ iY te os ¢ ga* Maa ia a 4) pean as BPS fae Ae, Ahi Periwmrrs WaAva an? pon theses yo" a” aie ~ Sab. weg NUS, AaAKm anne ie e ac ac Ae f a NOS Ae Pi Alaa. HELL ayer nenpenn hs pont acl PA A ieee oe eeraei agent yet [os Lime! ||| [Ppa Va Ae “a An. “pers ‘ak pa, ims Zrf® “ 4 Sm S mm | , Po.) “ 3 Terri yl. nr | r Alutkessar cont een. ‘nt ne ann ay Af ¢ aan hp EP Rerea. 2 oe USE GREE ly Say pe AAA v Ay Mbsin WT LILLU IV? Fidel ete AnAnPannaaalpthltaaseang i rtiaay ft? ad ae De Hj yvee TRH lelgie LAitia! lalalatinranla wry Haid } ee i | Va lala Sn Hyd aA’ | My ee rennet hahel Ty Mu Bio A laa’ ore mee. A at iY tag ye a : ’ RYYV) Ys ye Never * . . Well | || able . 1 4 Sf Pani tue veAsanOARUBeeOURgeAe ce fMRIRSRAR nay gf if ’ <5 Se ky ahh o Geo & . bas Airy She ase ow ¢ a Se ae | ~“e AN a, ae Wo de efototd I e | ay a , R ry nf ? god Case PY a hel hed. det ‘ Nd y Wy obit Pqey WA 6 fetta SO oc . ee: gece eee rn err LAL dn ine | LY TTY ys GaN * 5, : HON Mat Yeates. ten ) ‘. in saediasl tre 2. Te Ww geeua Na aw : ae ee a WI, Se gb4 ia. ® ape fH, ~~ ee vss 4 Wye Daa @ Cv Aaa WY YW