• AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE PROTOZOA AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE PROTOZOA E. A. MINCHIN, M.A., PH.D., F.KS. PBOFE880R OF PBOTOZOOLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON KOU ILLUSTRATED SECOND IMPRESSION LONDON EDWARD ARNOLD 1922 [All rightt reterted] PREFACE THIS book, as its name implies, is intended to serve as an intro- duction to the subject with which it deals, and not in any way as a complete treatise upon it. The science of " protozoology," as it is now generally termed, covers a vast field, and deals with an immense series of organisms infinitely varied in form, structure, and modes of life. In recent years the recognition of the importance of the Protozoa to mankind in various ways, and especially from the medical point of view, has focussed attention upon them, and has brought about a great increase of our knowledge concerning these forms of life. To set forth adequately and in full detail all that is now known about the Protozoa would be a task that could not be attempted in a volume of this size, but would require a work many times larger. The aim of the present work is essentially didactic — that is to say, it is intended to furnish a guide to those who, having at least some general knowledge of biology, desire a closer acquaintance with the special problems presented by the Protozoa. First and foremost, it attempts to define the position of these organisms in Nature, and to determine, as far as possible, in this way exactly what should be included under the term " Protozoa," and what should be excluded from the group. Secondly, its function is to guide the student through the maze of technicalities necessarily surrounding the study of objects unfamiliar in daily life, and requiring, consequently, a vocabulary more extensive than that of common language ; and with this aim in view, care has been taken to define or explain fully all technical terms, since confusion of thought can be avoided only by a clear understanding of their exact significance and proper application. Thirdly, it aims at introducing the student to the vast series of forms comprised in the Protozoa and their systematic classification, based on their mutual affinities and inter-relationships, so far as these can be inferred from theif structural peculiarities and their life-histories. And, incidentally, attention has been drawn specially to those parts of the subject where the Protozoa, throw vi PREFACE great light on some of the fundamental mysteries of living matter — as, for example, sex — and a special chapter dealing with the physiology of the Protozoa has been added. In so wide a field it is almost necessary to exercise some favour- itism in the choice of objects, and greater stress has been laid in this work upon the parasitic forms, both on account of the many interesting biological problems which they present, and also because they come into closer relationship with the practical needs of human life than the non-parasitic species. The author wishes, however, to point out clearly that he is not a medical man, but one who approaches the study of the parasitic Protozoa solely from the standpoint of a naturalist who is more concerned, so to speak, with the interests of the parasite than with those of the host. Conse- quently, purely medical problems — such as, for example, the symptoms and treatment of diseases caused by trypanosomes and other Protozoa — are not dealt with in this book, since the author deems it no part of his task to attempt to instruct medical men concerning matters with which they are better acquainted by their training and experience than himself. The needs of medical men have, however, been specially kept in view, and the author hopes that the book will succeed in supplying them with useful informa- tion, at least from a general zoological or biological standpoint. In a science, such as protozoology, which is growing actively and receiving continually new additions, and in which most of the data are based upon an elaborate and delicate technique, there are necessarily many controversial matters to be dealt with. In such cases the points at issue have been reviewed critically, and the author has, wherever possible, attempted to give a lead by indicating more or less decisively what is, in his opinion, the most probable solution of the problem under discussion. Such judgments, how- ever, are not intended to be put forward in a dogmatic or polemical spirit, since the author recognizes fully that any conclusion now reached may be upset entirely by fresh evidence to the contrary. The vast literature of the Protozoa would, if cited in full, easily fill by itself a volume of the size of the present one. It has been necessary, therefore, to restrict the limits of the bibliography as much as possible, both by selecting carefully the memoirs to be cited and by abbreviating their titles. The works selected for reference comprise, first, comprehensive treatises which deal with the subject, or with some part of it in a general way, and in which full references to older works will be found ; secondly, classical memoirs on particular subjects, also containing, as a rule, full bibliographies ; and, thirdly, such memoirs of recent date as have PREFACE vii been deemed worthy of citation. In the many cases where the same authors have published several works on a given subject, only the last of them is cited — for example, the volume of researches published recently by Mathis and Leger (473) covers the ground of the earlier memoirs published by these authors, which are therefore not cited ; similarly, the memoir upon amoebae by Nagler (95) covers the earlier work of Hartmann and Nagler upon Amoeba diploidea. Since it was quite impossible to make the bibliography in any way exhaustive, the aim has been to make it, like the rest of the book, introductory to the subject. It is hoped that any reader who, desirous of pursuing further some special subject, consults the references cited will find in them and in the further works quoted in them the means of acquiring complete information with regard to modern knowledge concerning all the points in question. The following classes of memoirs are not cited, however, in the bibliography, unless there was some special reason for doing so : faunistic works, papers describing new species, and writings of a polemical character. New memoirs on Protozoa are being published continually, so rapidly, and in so many different periodicals (some of them very difficult to obtain), that the author fears he may himself have overlooked many such, especially of those publications which have appeared very recently, while the book was in course of preparation. For such omissions, some of which have already come under his notice, he can but apologize, and at the same time promise that they shall be rectified in future editions, if the patronage of those interested in the subject enables further editions of this book to be published. The present edition does not, however, profess to deal with works published later than 1911. In order to further the object of making this book a guide to the technicalities of the subject, the plan has been adopted of printing in heavier black type in the index the numbers of those pages on which the term cited is fully explained, or, in the case of taxonomic names, is referred to its place in the systematic classification. In this way the index can be used as a glossary by anyone wishing to ascertain the significance of a technical term, or, though necessarily to a more limited extent, the systematic position of a genus, family, or order of the Protozoa. All that is necessary for this purpose is to look up the word in the index, and then to turn to the page or pages indicated by black type. The author has, in a few cases, modified the technical terminology in current use, or has made additions to it. The adjective in general use relating to chromatin is " chromatic," with its various deriva- viii PREFACE tives (" achromatic," etc.) ; since, however, these adjectives have a totally different meaning and use in optics, they have been altered to chromatinic, etc., in so far as they relate to chromatin. New terms used in this book are chromidiosome (p. 65, footnote), endosome (p. 73), as an equivalent to the German Binnenkorper, and gregarinula (p. 169). In conclusion, it is the author's pleasant duty to return thanks to those of his colleagues who have kindly rendered him assistance in his task. He is especially indebted for much help and many valuable suggestions and criticisms to Dr. H. M. Woodcock, whose unrivalled knowledge of recent bibliography has been throughout of the utmost assistance ; and to Dr. J. D. Thomson and Miss Muriel Robertson for many helpful discussions upon matters of fact or theory. Dr. A. G. Bagshawe, Professor J. B. Farmer, F.R.S., Mr. W. F. Lanchester, Dr. C. J. Martin, F.R.S., and Dr. P. Chalmers Mitchell, F.R.S., have kindly read through some of the chapters, and have given valuable advice and criticism. In justice to these gentle- men, however, it should be stated that they are in no way responsible for any of the theoretical opinions put forward by the author. The majority of the figures have been specially drawn from the original sources, or from actual preparations by Mr. R. Brook-Greaves and Miss Mabel Rhodes, to both of whom, the author's best thanks are due. LISTER INSTITUTE OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, CHELSEA, S.W., July I. 1912. CONTENTS CHAPTKB PAGES I. INTRODUCTORY — THE DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS OF THE PROTOZOA AND OF THEIR PRINCIPAL SUBDIVISIONS . - 1 — 12 II. THE MODES OF LIFE OF THE PROTOZOA ... 13 — 28 The Four Types of Nutrition, 13-15 ; Problems of Parasitism 15-28. III. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA — EXTERNAL FORM AND SKELETAL STRUCTURES - - - - 29 — 39 IV. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA (continued) — THE PROTO- PLASMIC BODY - - - - - 40 — 44 V. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA (continued) — DIFFERENTIATIONS OF THE ECTOPLASM AND ENDOPLASM ... 45 — 64 A. Ectoplasmic Organs — (1) Protective, 45; (2) Kinetic and Locomotor, 46 ; (3) Excretory, 60 ; {4) Sensory, 61. B. Endoplasmic Organs, 62. VI. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA (continued) — THE NUCLEAR APPARATUS — CHHOMATIN, NUCLEUS, CHROMIDIA, CENTRO- SOMES, AND BLEPHAROPLASTS - - 65 — 99 VII. THE REPRODUCTION OF THE PROTOZOA- ... 100 — 124 Types of Fission, 100 ; Division of the Nucleus, 101 ; Division of the Cell-Body, 122. VIII. SYNGAMY AND SEX IN THE PROTOZOA - - 125 — 161 Nature of the Sexual Process, 125 ; Occurrence of Sexual Phenomena and their Importance in the Life of the Organism, 128 ; Maturation and Reduction, 142 ; Examples of Syngamy and Reduction in Protozoa, 147 ; Theories of the Origin and Significance of the Syngamic Process, 154. x CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGES IX. POLYMORPHISM AND LIFE-CYCLES OF THE PROTOZOA - 162 — 185 A. Polymorphism, 162-176 ; B. Life-Cycles, 177-185. X. THE GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY OF THE PROTOZOA 186 — 211 (1) Nutrition and Assimilation, 187; (2) Respiration, 195; (3) Excretion and Secretion, 197 ; (4) Transmutation of Energy, 199 ; (5) Reactions to Stimuli and Environments, 201 ; (6) Degeneration and Regeneration, 208. XI. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE PROTOZOA : THE SARCODINA 212 — 256 A. Rhizopoda — I. Amoebaea, 218 ; II. Foraminifera, 231 ; III. Xenophyophora, 237 ; IV. Mycetozoa, 239. B. Actinopoda— V. Heliozoa, 244 ; VI. Radiolaria, 249. XII. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE PROTOZOA : THE MASTIGOPHORA 257 — 279 I. Flagellato, 257; II. Dinoflagellata seu Peridiniales. 276; III. Cystoflagellata seu Rhynchoflagellata, 278. XIII. THE H-asMOFLAGELLATEs AND ALLIED FORMS 280 — 322 I. Trypanosoma, 283 ; II. Trypanoplasma, 309 ; III. Crithidia, 312 ; IV. Leptomonas, 313 ; V. Leishmania, 316 ; VI. Prowa- zekia, 319. I XIV. THE SPOROZOA: I. THE GREGARINES AND COCCIDIA - - 323—355 I. Gregarinoidea, 326 ; II. Coccidia, 341. Comparison of the Life-Cycles of Gregarines and Coccidia, 354. XV. THE SPOROZOA: II. THE H^BMOSPORIDIA - • - 356 — 397 (1) HaemamoebaB, 357 ; (2) Halteridia, 365 ; (3) Leucocytozoa, 369 ; (4) Haemogregarines, 371 ; (5) Piroplasms, 378 ; Affinities of the Hsemosporidia, 388 ; of the Telosporidia, 395. XVI. THE SPOROZOA: III. THE NEOSPORIDIA - 398—429 I. Myxosporidia, 399 ; II. Actinomyxidia, 409 ; III. Micro- sporidia, 411 ; IV. Sarcosporidia, 419 ; V. Haplosporidia, 423. Incertce Sedia, 425. XVII. The INFUSORIA - 430—461 I. CSliata, 430; II. Acinetaria, 455. CONTENTS xi CHAPTER PAGES XVIII. AFFINITIES AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE MAIN SUBDIVISIONS — DOUBTFUL GROUPS - - . . . 462 — 474 General Phylogeny of the Protozoa, 463. Spirochsetes, 466 ; Chlamydozoa, 470. BIBLIOGRAPHY - ... 475 — 594 INDEX ... . . 605—517 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE PROTOZOA CHAPTER I INTRODUCTORY — THE DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS OF THE PROTOZOA AND OF THEIR PRINCIPAL SUBDIVISIONS THE Protozoa are a very large and important group of organisms, for the most part of minute size, which exhibit a wide range of variation in structural and developmental characters, correlated with the utmost diversity in their modes of life. Nevertheless, however greatly adaptation to the conditions of life may have modified their form, structure, or physiological properties, a certain type of organization is common to all members of the group. The most salient feature of the Protozoa is their unicellular nature ; that is to say, the individual in this subdivision of living beings is an organism of primitive character, in which the whole body has the morphological value of a single " cell," a mass of protoplasm containing nuclear substance (chromatin) concentrated into one or more nuclei. However complex the structure and functions of the body, the organs that it possesses are parts of a cell (" organellae "), and are never made up of distinct cells ; and at least one nucleus is present, or only temporarily absent, as a constant integral part of the organism. The unicellular nature of the Protozoa, though a constant character, cannot, however, be used by itself to define the group, since it is also a peculiarity of many other distinct types of simple living things. As an assemblage of organisms of primitive nature from which, in all probability, the ordinary plants and animals have originated in the remote past by divergent processes of evolution, the Protozoa have always possessed very great interest from the purely scientific and philosophical point of view. Of recent years, however, they have also acquired great practical importance from the relations that have been discovered to exist between Protozoa, of parasitic habit and many diseases of man and animals. Hence the study of the Protozoa has received an immense impetus, and has been 1 2 THE PROTOZOA cultivated zealously even by many who are not professed biologists, with the result that our knowledge of these organisms has made very great strides in the last two decades, and is advancing so rapidly that it becomes increasingly difficult for any single person to keep pace with the vast amount of new knowledge that is pub- lished almost daily at the present time. While the attention that is now focussed upon the Protozoa has led to a most gratifying increase of scientific and medical knowledge concerning particular forms, it tends frequently to a certain vague- ness in the notions held with regard to the nature and extent of the group as a whole. This is owing largely to the fact that many are now attracted to the study of the Protozoa whose aims are purely practical, and who investigate only a limited number of species in minute detail, without having an adequate foundation of general knowledge concerning other forms. Hence-io is important to attempt to frame a general definition of the Protozoa, or at least to characterize these organisms in such a way as to enable a dis- tinction to be drawn between them and other primitive forms of life. This object may be attained logically in two ways — either by considering the distinctive characters of the group, or by enu- merating the types of organisms which constitute it ; in more technical phraseology, by determining either the connotation or the denotation of the term Protozoa. To attempt this task will be the object of the present chapter. The name Protozoa was first used in 1820* as an equivalent of the German word Urthiere, meaning animals of a primitive or archaic type. This fitting designation superseded rapidly the older term Infusoria (Infusionsthierchen), used to denote the swarms of microscopic organisms which make their appearance in organic infusions exposed to the air. The word Infusoria is now em- ployed in a restricted sense, as the name of one of the principal subdivisions of the Protozoa (pp. 12 and 430). The first attempt at a scientific definition of the Protozoa was given by von Siebold, who defined them, from a strictly zoological standpoint, as unicellular animals. This definition, or a modifica- tion of it, is still the one given, as a rule, in zoological textbooks ; and from this time onwards the animal kingdom was subdivided universally into the Protozoa and the Metazoa. The Protozoa, as organisms in which the individual is a single cell, are regarded as those which come first (TT/SWTOS) in the ascending scale of animal life, or in the course of organic evolution ; the Metazoa, in which the individual is an organism composed of many cells, come after a) the simpler forms of life in rank and time. * For the detailed history of the growth of scientific knowledge of the Protozoa, see Biitschli (2), pp. i-zviii. DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS OF THE PROTOZOA 3 Siebold's generalization was a great step in advance, introducing clear and orderly ideas into the place of the chaotic notions pre- viously held, and setting definite limits to the group Protozoa by excluding from it various types of organisms, such as Sponges, Rotifers, etc., which had hitherto been classed as Protozoa, but which were now referred definitely to the Metazoa. Nevertheless Siebold's definition presents many difficulties, especially when con- sidered from a wider standpoint than that of the zoologist. This will be apparent if the two words of the definition given above, " unicellular animals," be considered critically. 1. " Unicellular." — Accepting the standpoint of the cell -theory, it has already been noted that many other organisms besides Protozoa must be regarded as single cells. Moreover, it is found that many organisms which must be classed as Protozoa appear constantly in a multicellular condition ; such are the well-known genus Volvox and its allies, besides examples of other orders. In all cases of this kind, however, the constituent cells are morphologically equivalent, and are to be regarded as complete individuals more or less inde- pendent, showing as a rule no differentiation, or, if any, only into reproductive and vegetative individuals ; and the multicellular organism as a whole is to be regarded as a colony of unicellular individuals primitively similar but secondarily differentiated, it may be, in relation to special functions. Such multicellular Protozoa present, in fact, a perfect analogy with the colonial forms seen in many groups of animals higher in the scale, especially the Coelentera, where also the members of a colony, primitively equivalent and similar amongst themselves, may become^ differentiated secondarily for the performance of distinct functions by a process of division of labour among different individuals. It is not possible to con- found the multicellular Protozoa with the Metazoa, in which the organism is not only composed of many cells, but exhibits also cell-differentiation based on mutual physiological dependence of the cells on one another, leading to the formation of distinct tissues ; that is to say, aggregations or combinations of numerous cells, all specialized for the performance of a particular function, such as contraction, secretion, and so forth. The essential feature of the Protozoa, as contrasted with the higher animals or plants, is to be sought in the independence and physiological completeness of the cell-individual. The Metazoa are tissue-animals, in which the primitive individuality of the cell is subordinated to, or has a restraint imposed upon it by, the corporate individuality of the cell -aggregate. In the Protozoa the cells are complete individuals, morphologically and physiologically of equal value. If, however, as few will doubt, the Motazoa have been evolved from sirr>t>le unicellular ancestors, similar to the THE PROTOZOA Protozoa, then there must have existed an unbroken series of transitions between these two types of living beings. Hence, as in all attempts to classify living beings, sharp verbal distinctions between Protozoa and Metazoa are rendered possible only through the extinction of intermediate forms, or by ignoring such forms if known to exist. It is expedient rather to recognize distinct types of organization characteristic of the Protozoa and the Metazoa respectively, and to compare and contrast them, than to attempt to limit these groups by precise definitions. 21. " Animals." — This part of the definition raises more difficulties than their cellular nature. In the higher forms of life the distinc- tion between animals and plants is an obvious and natural one ; it is by no means so in the lower organisms. In the ranks of the simplest living creatures, those of animal nature are not marked off by any sharply defined structural or other features from those of vegetable nature, and cannot be separated from them in any scheme of classification which claims to be founded upon, or to express, the true natural affinities and relationships of the objects dealt with. As will be explained more fully in the next and subsequent chapters, the distinction between animal and vegetable is, at its first appeal - ance, nothing but a difference in the mode in which the organisms obtain their living. Forms that are obviously closely allied in all their characters may differ in this respect, and in some cases even one and the same species may nourish itself at one time as a plant, at another as an animal, according to circumstances. In short, the difference between plant and animal is primarily a distinction based upon habits and modes of life, and, like all such distinctions, does not furnish characters that can be utilized for systematic classifica- tion until the mode of life has continued so long, and the habit has become so engrained, as to leave an impress upon the entire structural characteristics of the organism. The Protozoa cannot therefore be defined strictly and con- sistently as organisms of animal nature, for, though the vast majority of them certainly exhibit animal characteristics, it is impossible to exclude from the group many which live temporarily or permanently after the manner distinctive of the vegetable kingdom, and which are plants, to all intents and purposes, leading on in an unbroken series to the simplest algae. For this reason it has been proposed to unite all the simplest and most primitive forms of life in one " kingdom " under the title Protista (Protistenreich, Haeckel), irrespective of their habit of life and metabolism, whether animal or vegetable. The kingdom Protista is then to be considered as equivalent in systematic value to the animal and vegetable kingdoms, which in their turn are restricted in their application to true animals and plants as ordinarily DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS OF THE PROTOZOA understood. The term Protista thus unites under a single systematic category the vast assemblage of simple and primitive living beings from which the animal and vegetable kingdoms have taken origin, and have developed, by a continuous process of natural evolution, in different directions in adaptation to divergent modes of life. The conception of a Protistan kingdom separate from the animal and vegetable kingdoms is open to the objection that it contains organisms which are indubitably of animal or vegetable nature respectively. The relations of the Protista to other living things may be repre- sented graphically by the accompanying dia- gram (Fig. 1), wnere the circle represents the Protista, the two triangles the animal and vegetable kingdoms respectively. It is seen that the separation of the Protista as a systematic unity cuts across the ascending series of evolution ; to express it figuratively, it is a transverse cleavage of the phylogenetic " tree." A truly natural classification of living things, however, is one which expresses their genetic affinities and follows their pedigrees and lines of descent ; it should represent a vertical cleavage of the ancestral tree. Judged by this standard, the kingdom of the Protista can only be regarded as a convenient makeshift or compromise, rather than as a solution of a difficult problem — that, namely, of giving a natural classification of the most primitive forms of life. FIG. 1. — Graphic representa- tion of the relation of the animal and vegetable king- doms to the kingdom of the Protista (Protislenreich). The Protozoa are represented by the portion of the triangle representing the animal kingdom which lies within the circle representing the Protista. Whether the kingdom Protista be accepted or not as a natural and valid division of living beings, it is imperative to subdivide it further, not only on account of its vast extent and unwieldy size, but also because it comprises organisms very diverse in nature, requiring for their study the application of methods of technique and investigation often entirely different in kind. Hence in actual practice the Protista are partitioned among at least three different classes of scientific workers — zoologists, botanists, and bacteri- ologists— each studying them by special methods and to some extent from different points of view. It is necessary, therefore, to consider from a general standpoint the principal types of organization comprised in the kingdom Protista, and we can recognize at the outset two chief grades of structure, bearing in mind always that transitional forms between them must exist, or at least must have existed. In the first grade, which is represented by the Bacteria and allied groups of organisms, a type of organization is found which is probably the more primitive, though by many regarded as the 6 THE PROTOZOA result of degeneration and specialization. These organisms do not conform to the type of structure of the cell, as this word is usually understood, since they do not exhibit, speaking generally, a division of the living body substance into a nucleus distinct from the cytoplasm ;* but the chromatin is distributed through the proto- plasmic body in the condition of scattered lumps or granules (" chromidia "), and in many cases it constitutes, apparently, the whole or a very large proportion of the substance of the body. FIG. 2. — Amoeba •proieus. A, An individual in active movement ; the arrows indicate the direction of the currents in the protoplasm ; at r is seen a pseudo- podium which is nearly completely retracted and has assumed a mulberry- like appearance ; c.v., contractile vacuole ; /., faecal matter extruded at the end of the body posterior in movement ; the nucleus is obscured by the opacity of the protoplasm. B, An individual in the act of capturing its prey (P1), an Infusorian (Urocentrum) ; two psoudopodia have flowed round it, as shown by the arrows, and met at the point c, enclosing the prey ; another Infusorian (P2) is seen in a food vacuole in the body ; N., nucleus ; other letters as in A After Leidy (226), magnified 200 diameters. Further, the body in organisms of the bacterial type is of definite form, limited in many cases by a rigid envelope or cuticle, and special organs of locomotion are either absent or present in the form of so-called " flagella," structures perhaps different in nature from the flagella of truly cellular organisms. But the most remark- able and significant feature of organisms of the bacterial type is seen in the many different modes of metabolism and assimilation * The significance of the terms " nucleus," " cytoplasm," " chromidia," etc., w ill be explained more fully in subsequent chapters. DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS OF THE PROTOZOA 7 seen to occur amongst them. Although their metabolism is in general distinctly of a vegetative or saprophytic type, it ofterr exhibits peculiarities not found in any true plant.* In the second grade of the Protista, the organism possesses the characteristics of a true cell, in that the body shows a differentia- tion of the living substance into two quite distinct parts — the cytoplasm, or general body-protoplasm, in which is lodged at least one nucleus, a body representing a concentration and organiza- tion of the chro matin-substance. In some cases the nuclear sub- stance or chromatin may be in the scattered, chromidial condition \\\u //// / / / /,,& -S';" FIG. 3. — Actinosphcerium eichhornii. ect., Ectoplasm; end., endoplasm ; c.v,1, a contractile vaouole at its full size ; c.v.2, a contractile vacuole which has just burst ;/n>., f.v., food vacuoles ; D., a large diatom engulfed in the protoplasm ; ps., pseupopodia ; N., one of the numerous nuclei. After Leidy (226), magni- fied 250 diameters. during certain phases of the life-history, but such a condition is comparatively rare and probably always temporary. The body- protoplasm may be limited by a fircm envelope, or may, on the other hand, be naked, in which case the body-form may be quite in- definite. Organs of locomotion, when present, are of various kinds ; and these organs may serve also for the capture and ingestion of food. And, finally, the metabolism is always one of the four types * For a summary and review of different modes of metabolism among bacterial organisms, see article " Fermentation:" in Thorpe's " Dictionary of Applied Chemistry " (Longmans). 8 THE PROTOZOA described in more detail in the next chapter — namely, animal-like (holozoic), plant-like (holophytic), fungus-like (saprophytic), or at the expense of some other living organism (parasitic). The cellular organisms that constitute the second or higher grade of the Protista are commonly partitioned between botanists and zoologists as Protophyta (unicellular algae and fungi) and Protozoa respectively. It has been pointed out already, however, that this e.r- -P -N m FIG. 4. — Eiiglena apt- rogyra. ces., (Esopha- gus ; st., stigma ; c.r., reservoir of the con- tractile vacuole; P,P, paramylum - bodies ; N., nucleus. After Stein. FIG. 5. — Trichomonas eberthi, from the intestine of the common fowl, fll., Anterior flago.Ha, three in number ; p. ft., posterior flagellum, forming the edge of the undulating membrane ; chr.l., " chromatinic line," forming the base of the undulating membrane ; chr.b., "chromatinic blocks"; HI., blepharoplast from which all four llagella arise ; m., mouth-opening ; N., nucleus ax., axostyle. After Martin and Robertson. DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS OF THE PROTOZOA 9 method of subdividing them is purely arbitrary and artificial ; it leads to the result that many forms are claimed by both sides, and are always to be found described in both botanical and zoological treatises. It is nevertheless convenient for many reasons to retain the group Protozoa, even though we are obliged to include in it some forms which are plants in every sense of the word. The systematist who desires to give a rigidly logical definition of the Protozoa is, then, confronted with a dilemma : either to exclude from it forms with plant-like metab- olism which naturally belong to it, or, by admitting such forms, to impair the universal applicability of the definition given. Such difficulties arise in every attempt to apply rigid verbal definitions to natural groups of living things ; they are the direct outcome of the fact that all organisms have undergone and are undergoing a process of evolution, whereby they adapt themselves to new conditions of life and acquire new characters, as a result of which any two forms now distinct are or have been, connected by intermediate forms. N n B FIG. 6. — Trypnnosoma remaki of the pike. A , Slender form (" var. parva "). B, Stout form (" var. magna "). After Mirichin, x 2,000. WJ. 7. — Gregarina polymorpha, parasite of the digestive tract of the mealVvorm ; " syzygy " of two individuals attached to one another. In each individual, N,, nucleus; pr., proto- merite, or anterior segment of the body; d., deutomerite, or posterior segment. After Schneider. 10 THE PROTOZOA The attempt, therefore, made in the following paragraph to give a diagnosis of the Protozoa must not be regarded as a definition of the group in the rigidly logical sense, but merely as the construc- tion of a general type, the characters of which are liable to a certain amount of variation in special cases — a compromise between the claims of logic and the versatility of Nature. The Protozoa, then, are Protista in which the organization is of the cellular type, with nucleus distinct from the cytoplasm. They are uni- cellular, in the sense that the cell constitutes an entire individual, which may exist singly and in- dependently or in the form of cell- colonies ; but in the latter case the cells are not subordinated to the individuality of the entire cell- aggregate by the formation of C.V. FIG. 8. — Slentor roesdii, fully expanded. MS., (Esophagus ; N, band-like macro- nucleus c.v., contractile vacuole, con- nected with a long feeding-canal (/.c.) stretching down the body ; H, gelat- inous house into which the animal can retract itself completely ;/., fibres attaching the extremity to the stalk to the house. After Stein. oes FIG. 9. — Nyctotherua cordijormis, parasite of the rectum of the frog. N, Macronucleus ; n, micronucleus ; gr., mass of granules in front of the macronucleus ; OES., oesophagus; c.v., contractile vacuolo ; an., anus (cytopyge). After Stein. tissues. The body protoplasm is naked or clothed with a firm envelope, which is usually not of the nature of cellulose. Proto- plasmic organs are usually present for purposes of locomotion and for the capture and ingestion of food Chlorophyll is usually absent as a cell-constituent, and the metabolism is usually of the animal type. To these characters it may be added, though not as special peculiarities of Protozoa, that reproduction takes place DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS OF THE PROTOZOA 11 always by some form of fission — that is to say, division of the body into smaller parts ; that the phenomena known as "syngamy " and " sex " occur, perhaps universally, throughout the group ; and that it is very characteristic of Protozoa, as compared with other Protista, to exhibit in their life-history a develop- mental cycle, more or less complicated, in the course of which the organism may appear under very different forms at different stages in its develop- ment. The Protozoa, as thus under- stood, are commonly divided into four main subdivisions, termed "classes." Other methods of classifying the Protozoa have been suggested, which will be considered later ; for the present the old- established subdivisions are sufficient for our purpose. CLASS I., SARCODINA.* — Protozoa in which the proto- plasmic body is naked or non- corticate — that is to say, without a limiting envelope in the form of a cuticle, membrane, or stiff xjortical layer ; consequently the body tends to be either more or less spherical in floating forms, or to have an irregular, con- tinually changing shape in creeping forms. Organs serving for locomotion and capture of food are furnished by tem- porary extensions of the living protoplasm, termed pseudo- podia. A skeleton or shell may be present. Examples FIG. 10. — Acineta grandis. si., Stalk ; th., theca ; s., suctorial tentacles. After Saville Kent. * The name is derived from sarcode, the term coined by Dujardin to denote the living substance, subsequently named by von Mohl protoplasm, the term now universally employed. 12 THE PROTOZOA are Amoeba (Fig. 2), Difftugia (Fig. 16), Actinosphcerium (Fig. 3), etc. CLASS II., MASTIGOPHOBA.* — Protozoa in which the organs of locomotion and food-capture in the adult are flagella, slender fila- ments which are capable of performing active whip-like, lashing movements. The body-protoplasm may be naked or corticate. Examples are Euglena (Fig. 4), Trichomonas (Fig. 5), Trypanosoma (Fig. 6), etc. CLASS III., SPOROZOA. — Protozoa occurring always as parasites of other organisms, and without definite organs for locomotion or ingestion of food in the adult condition. The reproduction takes place, typically, by formation of resistant seed-like bodies, termed spores, containing one or more minute germs, termed sporozoites. Examples are Gregarina (Fig. 7), Coccidium (Fig. 152), the malarial parasites (Fig. 156), etc. CLASS IV., INTUSORIA. — Protozoa in which the organs of loco- motion and food-capture are cilia, small vibratile filaments dis- tinguished from flagella by their smaller size, by differences in their mode of movement, and by being present usually, in primitive forms at least, in great numbers like a fine fur over the whole or a part of the surface of the body. The cilia may be present through- out life (subclass Ciliata), or only in the early stages of the life- history (subclass Acinetaria). The body -protoplasm is always cor- ticate. Examples are Stentor (Fig. 8), Nyctotherus (Fig. 9), Acineta (Fig. 10), etc. Bibliography. — For a list of general works on Protozoa, see p. 476. * Derived from the Greek pa., contractile vacuole surrounded by feeding- vacuoles ; al., alveolar layer ; at, meridional rows of cilia ; a., anal pore. After Schewiakoff, magnified 660 diameters. layer, which is produced either as a differentiation of, or secretion by, the most superficial layer of the protoplasmic body, and which receives various names in different cases. The very first beginnings of a cortical layer are seen in some species of amoebae, such as Amoeba verrucosa — species in which the protoplasm, extremely viscid and slow-flowing, forms a delicate investing pellicle at the surface. In these cases the pellicle is so thin that it does not hinder the amoeboid movement appreciably (Fig. 23). A further advance is seen in some of the Flagellata, THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA 33 N where a thin cuticle is present which permits changes in shape, caused . by the contractility of the enclosed protoplasmic body. Such forms are not amoeboid, but exhibit rhythmical changes of form produced by contractions of the superficial body-layer in a manner somewhat recalling peristaltic movement, and are com- monly said to be metabolic (Fig. 15) ; and since such movements are characteristic of some species of the genus Euglena, they are sometimes called euglenoid. In most cases, however, in which a cuticle or firm cortex is present, a definite and characteristic body-form is main- tained, subject only to such changes as may result from curvatures of the body, or temporary shortening of its axis in a particular direction, brought about by the contractility of the living body. An envelope of this kind, which may vary in consistence from a thin, flexible cuticle to a rigid inflexible cuirass, or " lorica," inhibits completely the natural tendency of the fluid protoplasmic body to round itself off — a tendency, however, which frequently reasserts itself during resting phases of the organism, when the cortex may be softened or absorbed. Hence it is very common to find that the resting phases of Protozoa revert to the primi- tive spherical form, whatever the shape characteristic of the organism in an active state. A close-fitting cortex or cuticle which is essentially a part of the body itself must be distinguished clearly from struc- tures built up by the organism externally to the body tq afford shelter or support. Such a structure is termed variously a "shell," "test," or "house." The formation of protective shells, into which the body can be completely retracted, and from which it can emerge to a greater or less extent, is of extremely common occurrence amongst the naked-bodied Sarcodina. The forms of these shells, their structure and mode of formation, exhibit an almost infinite variety, and can only be described here in a quite general manner. 3 FIG. 15. — Astasia tenax, two individuals showing the changes of form duo to metabolic movement, ces., (Esophagus ; c.r., reservoir of the contractile vacuole ; N., nucleus. After Stein. 34 THE PROTOZOA As regards material, the shells may be composed of elements secreted by the organism (" autophya," Haeckel), as in Hyalosphenia (Fig. 16, B), or of foreign particles taken up by the animal from its surroundings (" xenophya " ), as in Dijflugia (Fig. 16, A). Skeletal elements secreted by the organism may be of organic or inorganic nature. In the former case they are probably cbitinous in most cases, or composed of a substance allied to chitin ; in the latter they are either calcareous or siliceous. A good example of the formation of a shell is seen in Euglypha (Fig. 59), where the chitinous plates composing it are formed first of all in the interior of the proto- plasmic body, and pass to the surface to build up the shell. When the shell is built up of foreign particles, the material employed may vary greatly, and consists generally of particles of sand, grit, etc., FIG. 16. — Examples of shells or houses formed by Protozoa. A, Difflugia spiralis, which forms a house built up of foreign bodies ; B, Hyalosphenia cuneata, in which the house is built up of plates secreted by the animal itself (compare also Euglypha, Fig. 59). Both these species belong to the order Amcebsea ; the pseudopodia (ps.) are seen streaming out of the mouth of the shell. After Leidy ; A magnified 250, B 500 diameters. taken up at hazard from the environment. Such shells are de- scribed technically as " arenaceous." In the case of Difllugia, Verworn (36) was able to cause it to build up its test of various materials, such as particles of coloured glass or other substances, when these were supplied to it exclusively. Many species of Foraminifera, however, form their tests exclusively of particular materials under natural conditions. Thus, in the genus Haliphy- sema (Fig. 17) the test is formed of sponge-spicules ; in Technitella thompsoni the calcareous plates of echinoderms are selected ; and other instances could be cited in which the organism selects habitually for its shell certain materials from a varied environment in which the particular materials required may be far from common in occurrence relatively to other particles apparently equally suitable (see especially Heron- Allen and Earland). Verworn {36) found that THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA 35 in the case of Difflugick the foreign particles used are taken up by the pseudopodia during the process of being retracted ; the surface of the pseudopodium then becomes wrinkled, and particles of debris are caught in these wrinkles, and so drawn into the interior of the protoplasmic body, in which they are stored up in the fundus of the shell, like the plates in Euglypha, and are utilized in the growth of the shell, or in repairing damages to it, or in building a new shell when the animal reproduces itself by division. FIG. 17. — Haliphysema tumanowiczii, a foraminifer which builds up its house out of sponge- spicules. A, part of the protoplasm stained to show the nuclei (n. ) ; B, a living specimen with expanded pseudopodia (p.). After Lankester (11). The simplest architectural type of shell or test is a simple spherical or oval capsule, usually with a large aperture at one pole through which the protoplasm is able to creep out in order to capture food or perform the function of locomotion (Fig. 16). The wall of the test may be imperforate, or may have fine pores through which also the protoplasm can stream out. With continued growth of the organism, the original shell may become too small for its requirements. Then the organism may reproduce itself by fission. 36 THE PROTOZOA and the daughter-individual forms a new shell for itself. In many cases the shell formed by the daughter is larger than that of the parent ; for instance, in Centropyxis aculeate, and other species, in which the young individuals multiply by fission, and each time they do so, the new shell formed is larger than the old one, until the full size of the adult individual is reached (Schaudinn, 131), after which point the new shell formed after the process of fission is of the same size in both the parent and the daughter- individual. In such cases the shell is always a single chamber, and is described technically as " mono thai am ous." In other cases, however, the organism does not multiply by fission when it has outgrown its first shell, but forms a new shell of larger size which is in continuity with its first shell ; the protoplasmic body now occupies both the chambers of the shell formed in this way. With further growth more chambers are formed, giving rise to a complex " polythalamous " shell composed of many chambers all occupied by the protoplasmic body (p. 232, infra). For a detailed study of the developmental mechanics of shell-formation, see Rhumbler (35). 2. Internal Skeletal Structures. — In many cases in which the proto- plasmic body is naked at the surface, or bears only an extremely thin cuticle, a definite body-form may be maintained by means of internal supporting fibrils or other similar structures (Koltzoff, 30, 31). In some cases such structures may be of temporary nature. A beautiful example of this is seen in the delicate organic axes formed in the pseudopodia of Heliozoa (Fig. 22), in the form of slender needle-like rods secreted by the protoplasm to stiffen the pseudopodia, and absorbed again when the pseudopodia are re- tracted. In other cases, supporting structures of organic nature may be permanent constituents of the protoplasmic body ; such are the axial rods, or " axostyles," found in many flagellates, such as Trichomonas (Fig. 5, ax.), Lophomonas (Fig. 45), etc., slender flexible rods of organic substance which form a supporting axis for the body. Previous to division the axqstyle is absorbed, and new axostyles are formed in the daughter-individuals. The axostyles are stated to arise from a centrodesmose (p. 103, infra) formed in the process of division of the blepharoplast (Dobell, 236) or of the centriole of the nucleus (Hartmann and Chagas, 62) ; the centrodesmose per- sists after division is complete, and its two halves become the axostyles of the two daughter-individuals. In Trichomonas eberthi, however, Martin and Robertson (348) find that the axostyles arise after division quite independently of the centrodesmoses or other nuclear structures. In Octomitus (Fig. 116) two axostyles are present. From supporting structures of organic nature, such as the axostyles or the organic axes of the pseudopodia mentioned above, it is not difficult to derive the more rigid and permanent elements known as " spicules," in which the organic basis becomes indurated by deposits of inorganic mineral substance. In some cases spicules may perhaps consist entirely of mineral substance deposited directly within the living substance without any organic basis. In THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA 37 either case the spicules grow by accretion — that is to say, by deposi- tion of fresh layers of inorganic substance upon that already laid down — and if such accretion takes place at one end of a rod- shaped spicule, it may have the result that the opposite extremity of the spicule is pushed outwards by the continued growth, with the result that the oldest portion of the spicule projects freely far beyond the limits of the body. As regards material, spicules are usually either calcareous or siliceous — in the first case generally carbonate of lime, in the second FIG. 18. — Acantliocystis chcelophora, a Heliozoon with a skeleton of slender radiating siliceous spicules, each forked at the distal end. In the interior of the body are seen numerous symbiotic algae (dark) and non-contractile vacuoles (clear) ; one vacuole of larger size is seen, probably the contractile vacuole. sp., sp., Spioules ; ps., ps., pseudo podia. After Leidy, magnified 750 diameters. case amorphous silica In the family AcanthometridcB among the Radiolaria the spicules are formed of a substance which was thought to be of organic nature, and was named " acanthin," but which has been found to consist of strontium sulphate. As regards their form and relation to the body, the spicules in the simplest cases are rod-shaped or needle-like elements disposed radially or tangentially. A simple type of spicular skeleton is seen in Acanihocystis (Fig. 18), in which elongated siliceous rods, fre- 38 THE PROTOZOA Fio. 19. — Clathrvlina elegans, a Heliozoon with a lattice-like skeleton, attached by a stalk. Two individuals are seen, the younger with its stalk attached to tho head of tho older ; in the younger the lattice-work is still very delicate. Both individuals are sending out numerous radiating pseudopodia, very delicate and slender. After Leidy, magnified 750 diameters. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA 39 quently branched at their distal ends, are arranged like radii of the spherical body, projecting freely for some distance from the surface. In other cases the spicules may be disposed tangentially to the body, as in the family Collidce amongst the Radiolaria, and in other forms belonging to this order. From a simple type of skeleton composed of separate spicules, more complicated types of skeletons are de- rived by fusion of the spicules to form a connected framework. The commonest type of this is a fusion of tangentially-disposed spicules to form a lattice- work ; an example of this is seen in ClathruUna (Fig. 19), in which a lattice-like skeleton is formed at the surface of the body, standing off from it like a shell. Skeletons of this type are especially characteristic of the Radiolaria, a group In which the architecture of the skeleton may reach a very high degree of complication and exhibits endless variety. The lattice- like framework, made up of t/angentially-arranged spicules united together, may be further strengthened by radially-disposed beams. As the animal grows, it may outgrow the framework first laid down, and another lattice-work is formed concentric with the first, and connected with it by radial beams ; later on a third and a fourth such framework is formed, as the organism continues to grow in size. Skeletons formed in this way may be " homaxon " — that is to say, built up on the axes of a sphere ; or " monaxon," with one principal axis ; or may follow various plans of symmetry, or may be asymmetrical (p. 250, infra). Bibliography. — For references, see p. 477. CHAPTER IV THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA (Continued)— THE PROTOPLASMIC BODY THE substance composing the bodies of Protozoa was termed originally sarcode by Dujardin ; but after it had been shown to be identical in nature with the living substance of the cells of animals and plants, the same term was employed universally for both, and the word protoplasm, coined by von Mohl to designate the living substance of plant-cells, -supplanted the older term sarcode, which has now quite dropped out of current use. It would be impossible within the limits of the present work to discuss in detail the various theories that have been put forward with regard to the nature and constitution of protoplasm ; they can only be summarized in brief outline here. Protoplasm, when seen under the microscope with powers of moderate strength, presents itself as a, viscid, semi-fluid substance, sometimes clear and hyaline in special regions, but always showing, throughout at least the greater part of its substance, numerous granulations, which vary greatly in size, from relatively coarse grains to those of the minutest size visible with the power of the microscope used. The most important of these granulations are the so-called "chro matin- grains," which are discussed fully in Chapter VI. ; in this chapter only non-chromatinic granules are dealt with. The coarser proto- plasmic grains may be present in greater or less quantity, or may be entirely absent ; they are to be regarded for the most part as so-called metaplastic bodies — that is to say, as stages in, or by- products of, the upward or downward metabolism of the organism. On the other hand, the minute, ultimate granules, or " microsomes," are never absent, except over limited areas, in any sample of proto- plasm. It is on the constant presence of granules that the so-called granular theory of protoplasm, especially connected with the name of Altmann, has been founded. On this view, each minute granule is regarded as an elementary organism, or " bioblast," capable in itself of all vital functions, and equivalent to a single free-living bacterium, just as a single cell of a Metazoan body may be compared with a single Protozoan organism. Protoplasm, on this view, is re- 40 THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA 41 garded as a colony of bioblasts, imbedded in a fluid matrix, com- parable in a' general way to a zoogloea-colony of bacteria. A special and important class of motaplastic granules are the so-called " deutoplasmic " bodies, consisting of reserve food- materials stored up in the protoplasmic substance. Examples of such are the yolk-granules of ova, the paraglycogen-grains of gregarines, the plastinoid bodies of coccidia, starch-grains in holophytic forms, etc. Amongst the granulations of the protoplasm, special mention must be made of the bodies known generally as chondriosomes and mitochondria, but also by a variety of other names (cytomicrosomes, bioblasts, spherules or sphero- plasts, and, collectively, ergastoplasm). The chondriosomes are not to be classed with the temporary, metaplastic inclusions, but are permanent ele- ments of the cell- protoplasm. The chondriosomes of Protozoa have recently been the subject of detailed study by Faure-Fremiet (38'5). In the living condition they are small transparent bodies, feebly retractile, and of a pale grey tint. In shape they are generally spherical, and vary from 0'5 p. to 1'5 p. in diameter. In some cases the chondriosome appears homogeneous in structure ; in others it presents the appearance of a vacuole with fluid con- tents and a denser peripheral layer. In contact with water or with weak alkalis they swell up immediately. When the nucleus (in Infusoria the micronucleus) divides, the chondriosomes also divide simultaneously, and the daughter- chondriosomes are sorted out between the two daughter- cells ; they have, however, no direct relation with the nuclear apparatus. In the process of division each chondriosome becomes first rod-like, then dumb-bell- shaped, and is finally constricted directly into two halves. A purely chemical definition of the chondriosomes, according to Faurd- Fremiet, cannot be given. They exhibit the reactions of a fatty acid, and can be considered as combinations of fatty acids or of phosphates of albumin. The physiological function of the chondriosomes is not clear, but Faure- Fremiet considers that they " play an important part in the life and evolu- tion of the sexual cell," in Protozoa or Metazoa, and are active in the elabora- tion of deutoplasmic substances of fatty nature, into which they may be transformed directly. It has been shown, however, that the minute granules of proto- plasm do not lie isolated from one another, suspended freely in a matrix, but are seen in the microscopic image to be connected with one another by fine lines or darker streaks, the whole forming a delicate network, at the nodes of which the granules are lodged. In some cases the granule itself is perhaps only an optical effect produced by a node of the network. On these appearances has been founded the so-called reticular theory of protoplasm, connected especially with the names of Heitzmann, Schafer, and others. On this view protoplasm has been regarded as composed of an exceed- ingly fine reticulum, a network or feltwork ramifying in all planes, bearing the granulations at its nodal points, and bathed throughout by a fluid, more or less watery sap, or enchylema. The fibrillar theorj' of Flemming may be regarded as a modification of the reticular theory. Against the reticular theory of protoplasm, it may be urged that it leads to physical difficulties, in view of the generally fluid, nature of protoplasm. For the reticulum must itself be either of a fluid or a solid nature ; if fluid, it presents the condition of one fluid 42 THE PROTOZOA suspended in the form of a network in another fluid with which it does not mix — a condition which could not exist for more than an instant of time, since the fluid reticulum must break up immediately into minute droplets. If, on the other hand, the reticulum is of rigid consistence, the protoplasm as a whole could not be fluid, any more than a sponge soaked in water could behave as a fluid mass in the aggregate. The difficulty can, however, be overcome by supposing the apparent reticulum to be the optical expression, not of a fine network of fibrils, but of delicate lamellae limiting minute closed chambers, or alveoli. Then the fine line seen with the microscope joining any two adjacent nodal points would be the optical section of the wall or lamella separating two contiguous alveoli, and protoplasm as a whole would possess a honeycombed structure comparable to that of a fine foam or lather — the fluid lamellae of the foam represented by the apparent reticulum of the protoplasm, and the air-contents of the individual bubbles repre- sented by the enchylema. Or, to express the state of things in a different manner, protoplasm could be regarded as an emulsion of very fine structure, composed of two fluids not miscible with one another — namely, the more fluid enchylema, which is suspended in the form of minute droplets in the more viscid substance forming the alveolar framework. This is the so-called alveolar theory, especially connected with the name of Biitschli ; by this conception of protoplasmic structure, not only are the necessary physical con- ditions satisfied, but an explanation is given for many peculiarities of protoplasmic bodies, such as the radiate arrangement of the meshes of the reticulum commonly observed either at the surface of the body or around solid or fluid bodies contained in the proto- plasm, and so forth. The vario as theories that have been mentioned all assume tacitly that protoplasm* is monomorphic — that is to say, that it possesses one fundamental type of minute structure. Fischer, on the other hand, seeks to unite all the different theories by supposing that protoplasm is a polymorphic substance — that is to say, one that may exhibit a diversity of structure at different times and under different conditions, as the result of changes produced by its inherent vital activity. Thus, he supposes that a given mass of protoplasm may be at one time .homogeneous, and at another time granular, reticular, fibrillar, or alveolar, as the result of a process of " vital precipitation," and that by reabsorption of the structural elements it may return to a homogeneous condition. Faure-Fremiet (38 and 38'5) also regards protoplasm as a homogeneous fluid, which is pre* cipitated by reagents, and which normally contains, in suspension, a certain number of granulations, some temporary, others per- manent in nature ; compare also Degen (154). THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA 43 Those investigators of the Protozoa, who have expressed an opinion on the subject have been for the most part in favour of the alveolar theory of protoplasm, since it was first propounded by its author, Biitschli (see especially Rhumbler). Protozoa as a rule are very favourable objects in which to study the foam-Hke structure of the protoplasm (compare Schaudinn, 130, p, 188). But what- ever view be held as to the ultimate structure of protoplasm, its essentially fluid nature is very apparent in these organisms, and is a point upon which it is very important to be clear. The fluid condition of the living substance is manifested directly by the streaming movements to be observed in it, and indirectly by a number of phenomena, such as the tendency, already mentioned, of the body to round itself off when at rest, and the tendency of all vacuoles to assume a spherical form. A vacuole is a drop of fluid suspended in the protoplasmic body, and may be regarded as formed by the bursting and running together of many minute alveoli, just as a large bubble in a foam may arise by the union of many smaller ones ; or by the gradual enlargement of a single alveolus by diffusion of fluid into it from neighbouring alveoli, until it attains proportions relatively gigantic. Vacuoles assume uni- formly spherical contours, except when they are deformed by mutual pressure from crowding together or from other causes. In some cases the protoplasm may be so full of coarse vacuoles that it exhibits an obvious frothy structure, which must by no means be confounded with the ultimate alveolar structure of the protoplasm, a structure which is exceedingly delicate, only to be observed with high powers of the microscope and with careful attention to all details of microscopic technique. Examples of vacuolated bodies are seen especially in Heliozoa — e.g., Actinospkcerium (Fig. 3). The statement, however, that protoplasm generally is of fluid nature admits of its exhibiting many degrees of fluidity, and some samples of protoplasm are far more viscid than others. This is true both of different species of organisms, of the same species at different phases of its development, and of different parts of the same organism. In some cases portions of the protoplasm may be stiffened to a degree that perhaps oversteps the ill-defined boundary between the liquid and solid states of matter. In a great many Protozoa, perhaps the majority of them, the protoplasm of the body is divisible, more or less distinctly, into two regions — namely : 1. An external or cortical zone, termed ectoplasm or ectosarc ; in appearance and consistence typically clear, hyaline, more refringent, finely granular or without visible granulations, and of more viscid nature ; in function protective, kinetic, excretory, and sensory. 2. An internal or medullary region, the endo plasm or endosarc ; 44 THE PROTOZOA opaque, less refringent and coarsely granular ; the seat of trophic and reproductive functions. These two zones of the protoplasmic body are, in the more primi- tive forms, differentiations of the protoplasm more or less tem- porary and transient in nature. For instance, in an amoeba which is in active movement, fluid endoplasm is constantly flowing along the axes of the pseudopodia towards their tips, where it comes into contact with the surrounding medium, the water or other fluid in which the amoeba lives. Under the influence of the medium the endoplasm is converted into ectoplasm, becomes of stiffer, less fluid consistence, and loses its coarse granulations. At the same time, at the hinder end of the amoeba, ectoplasm is continually passing into the interior of the body, where it becomes liquefied and granular in structure, and is converted into endoplasm (Rhumbler 34). In Protozoa, however, which do not exhibit amoeboid movement, the ectoplasm and endoplasm may be two independent layers, well defined and perfectly separate the one from the other. The ecto- plasm is the seat of those functions which are connected with the relation of the organism to the outer world, to the environment in which it lives ; the endoplasm, on the other hand, is concerned specially with the internal affairs, so to speak, of the protoplasmic body. In the following two chapters the various organs of the Protozoa will be considered under the headings of the layer from which they are formed, and according to the functions they perform Bibliography. — For references, see p. 477. CHAPTER V THE ORGANIZATION OP THE PROTOZOA (Continued)— DIFFERENTIATIONS OF THE ECTOPLASM AND ENDOPLASM A. Ectoplasmic Organs. THE various structures and organs produced from the ectoplasm are best classified by the functions they subserve, under the headings of protective, kinetic and locoinotor, excretory, and sensory mechanisms. 1. The protective function of the ectoplasm is often seen in organisms in which no cuticle or envelope is present. It has been observed, for instance, that the species of Myxosporidia that inhabit the gall-bladders or urinary bladders of their hosts resist the effects of the medium in which they live so long as their ecto- plasm is intact, but succumb if it be injured. In most Protozoa other than those belonging to the class Sarco- dina, however, a special protective envelope or cortex is present at the surface of the body, and such forms are commonly said to be corticate. A cuticle may be formed in various ways, distinguished by the use of different terms. It may represent the entire ecto- plasm, modified in its entirety to form an envelope, as in the peri- plast of the Flagellata ; it may represent a transformation or modi- fication of only the most superficial layer of the ectoplasm, as in the pettide of the Infusoria and of some amoebae— for instance, Amoeba verrucosa, the epicyte of the gregarines, etc. ; or it may arise as a secreted layer deposited at the surface of the ectoplasm, and not derived from a modification of the substance of the ectoplasm itself, in which case it is termed a " cell- membrane." Whatever its mode of origin, the cuticle may be developed to a very variable degree, from the thinnest possible membrane, some- times very difficult to discover, to a thick and tough investment which may be termed a " cuirass " or " lorica " (" Panzer "), when it is formed by thickening of a pellicle ; or a " house " or " shell," when it is a greatly thickened cell- membrane standing off from the body. In many cases the cuticle undergoes local thickenings to form spikes or hooks, which may serve as organs of attachment, as in the epimerite of gregarines (Fig. 142). 45 46 THE PROTOZOA In addition to the passive protection afforded by a cuticle, organs of active defence may be present in the ectoplasm in the form of bodies known as trichocysts, found commonly in many ciliate In- fusoria (p. 447, Fig. 187) ; they are little oval or spindle-shaped bodies which on suitable stimulation are converted explosively into a stiff thread which is shot out from the surface of the body. (For the nematocyst-like organs known as "polar capsules," in Myxo- sporidia and allied organisms, see p. 399, infra.) 2. The ectoplasm is shown to be the seat of movement both by the fact that motile organs arise from it and by the frequent presence in it of special contractile mechanisms. The motile organs which are found in the Protozoa are pseudopodia, flagella, cilia with their various modifications, and undulating membranes ; any of these structures may subserve the function of food capture in addition to, or instead of, that of locomotion. These organs will now be described in order, after which contractile mechanisms will be dealt with. (1) Pseudopodia are organs of temporary nature, extruded from the protoplasm when required, and retracted when no longer needed. They can be formed, probably, in all cases in which the body protoplasm is naked, or limited only by a cuticle not of sufficient thickness to inhibit the movements of the underlying protoplasm. They arise simply as an eruption of the protoplasm at some point at the surface of the body, forming an outgrowth or process which varies greatly in different cases as regards size, length, width, com- position, and activity. Pseudopodia always arise in the first instance from the ectoplasm, and may consist throughout of this layer alone, in which case they are relatively stiffer and more rigid ; or a core of endoplasm may flow into the pseudopodium when it has grown to a certain length, in which case the pseudopodium is more fluid and flexible. The formation of a pseudopodium is best studied in a common amoeba, such as Amoeba proteus (Fig. 2) or A. Umax (Fig. 20) ; it is then seen to arise as a protrusion of the ectoplasm, forming a shallow promi- nence at the surface of the body. The prominence continues to grow out from the body, and is at first hyaline, transparent, and free from granulations, since it consists of ectoplasm alone. In some cases the pBeudopodium may grow to a relatively very large size, and still consist of clear ectoplasm alone, as in Entamceba histolytica (Fig. 90), a form rather exceptional in this respect ; more usually, so soon as the budding pseudopodium has reached a certain not very great size, a core of granular endoplasm flows into it and forms the axial part of the pseudopodium. It is then easier to study the formation of the pseudopodium, since the granules in the endo- plasm permit the characteristic flowing movements and currents to THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA 47 bo followed. In the growing pseudopodium a strong current can be observed flowing down the axis to the tip, and there spreading out and breaking up into weaker currents which turn round and flow backwards along the surface of the pseudopodium. In amoebae with a very viscid surface layer the back-currents are very feeble, ceasing a short way from the tip of the pseudopodium, and often scarcely discernible, or even absent altogether ; in species with a fluid ectoplasm, however, the back - currents are distinctly seen, and may even pass back and bend round again to join the forward axial current, as described by Rhumbler (34) in Amoeba blattce. While the extrusion of the pseudopodium is an active process, the retraction requires nothing but the action of purely physical forces of surface-tension to explain it. The protoplasm theji flows back into the body of the animal, and may present some character- istic appearances in doing so. If one surface is in contact with the substratum on which the animal is creeping, the adhesion of the pseudopodium often causes the tip to be drawn out into slender processes like spikes or hairs. At the same time the surface of the FIG. 20. — Diagram to show the protoplasmic currents in a Umax- amoeba which is moving forward in the direction indicated by the large arrow on the left. The smaller arrows indicate the direction, and their length the intensity, of the currents in different parts of the body. A forwardly-directed " fountain current " starts from near the hinder end, and passes along the axis of the body to the extremity anterior in movement ; there it turns outwards and passes back along the sides of the body, diminishing rapidly in intensity, and finally dying -out in the regions where the two dots are placed. After Rhumbler (34). pseudopodium may present a wrinkled appearance, as the viscid ectoplasm shrinks in consequence of the rapid withdrawal of the fluid endoplasm. The pseudopodia of different species of organisms, or even of the same species at different periods of the life-cycle, vary greatly in form, appearance, and structural characters, and the more im- portant variations require a special terminology. In the first place, the pseudopodia may be bpoad and thick relatively to their length, as in Amoeba proteus (Fig. 2) ; they are then termed " lobose " (" lobopodia "), and usually have a core of endoplasm. A typical lobose pseudopodium is, in fact, nothing more than an outgrowth of the body -protoplasm as a whole. In the most extreme cases of thib type, the whole body flows forward in one direction, forming, as it were, a single pseudopodium. Such a mode of progression is characteristic of Amoeba Umax (Fig. 20) and other similar forms, in which the body glides forward like a slug as the animal creeps over substratum ; the end which is anterior in movement is rounded, 48 THE PROTOZOA while the posterior end commonly becomes drawn out into processes similar to those seen in a pseudopodium in process of retraction. In other forms, such as A. proteus (Fig. 2), the pseudopodia are sent out on all sides and balance each other, in which case there is very little translation of the body as a whole, and the pseudopodia serve chiefly for food-capture. If, however, the outflow of the pseudo- podia is strongest on one side of the body, the organism moves in that direction as a whole, and the larger, more strongly developed pseudopodia counteract and overcome the pull exerted by those that are weaker. It will be readily understood, therefore, that the most rapid powers of progression are possessed by the slug-like amoebae, in which a single pseudopodium drags the whole body along without opposition from others. Rhumbler (34) has drawn attention to the existence of two modes of progression exerted by amoebae of the lobose type. In the more fluid species which creep upon a substratum to which they adhere more or less firmly, like Amoeba proteus, the animal pro- gresses by a flowing movement, such as has been described ; this is the commonest type of amoeboid locomotion. On the other hand, in species of the type of A. verrucosa and A. terricola, the very slightly fluid body is limited by a thin pellicle, and does not adhere to the substratum ; then progression is effected by " rolling " movement. The animal throws out a number of pseudopodia on one side, which cause it ultimately to overbalance and roll over to that side ; by continued repetition of this procedure, a slow progres- sion in a particular direction is effected. At other times, however, A. verrucosa may flow along like other amoebae. Contrasting with the lobose pseudopodia are the slender, thread- like, so-called " filose " pseudopodia, formed entirely of ectoplasm. Pseudopodia of this type can effect a slow creeping movement, but are not very effective for locomotion, and serve for food-capture principally, or even entirely, as in the radiate floating forms (Heliozoa and Radiolaria) ; food is entangled by them and drawn into the body. The filose pseudopodia may radiate from the body in all directions, remaining separate from one another, or they may anastomose to form networks, and are then termed " reticulose." Pseudopodia of the reticulose type are specially characteristic of the Foraininifera (Fig. 21). Radiatn pseudopodia which do not form anastomoses, on the other' hand, characterize the groups of the Heliozoa and Radiolaria, organisms of floating habit. As noted above, pseudopodia of the radiate type are generally supported by an axial rod, a secreted structure of firm, elastic nature, and are hence known as axopodia. The actual rod reaches some way into the endoplasm, often to the centre of the body, as in Acanthocystis (Fig. 18), Wagnerella (Fig. 48), etc. ; it THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA \ ' IMI \\\MW^ 7'//j IK I \ f i in i, \ // 1 u Aiw '/ / Hi MM \i\U • \ i s* \ V /111 u'Vv i i \\icm\ i & vYi\\ 1\\W ! i •> > \ \ !. V ', \ \ FIG. 21. — Oromia ovi- formis, M. Schultze (=O. ovoidea, Rhumbler), living specimen with out- stretched pseudo- podial network (ps.), in which a diatom (d.), Navi- cvla sp., is en- tangled and will be drawn into the shell (ah.). Other diatoms are seen inside the shell, and at its fundus several nuclei are seen as clear spheri- cal bodies in the protoplasm. The pseudopodial net- work is drawn at a magnification of about 200 linear, but for want of space is repre- sented extending over about one- third of the area over which it com- monly spreads. A part of the pseu- dopodial network is reflected back over the shell, and streams out back- wards from the pole opposite to the shell - mouth. After M. Schultze. \ * K \ i\ '< " 50 THE PROTOZOA is probably of endoplasmic origin, and is pushed out from it in a centrifugal direction. As it grows out, the ectoplasm forms a sheath over it, and extends usually some way beyond it. When the pseudopodium is retracted, the axial rod is liquefied and absorbed by the protoplasm. Food-capture is effected by the pseudopodia in various ways (see p. 189). In forms with lobose pseudopodia they flow round the body to be ingested, enclosing it on all sides, and finally imprisoning the prey in a closed chamber of the living substance, together with a drop of water which forms the food - vacuole (Fig. 2, P\ P2) in which the prey is digested (p. 192, infra). A very noticeable feature of pseudopodia of all kinds is their adhesive- ness, due to the secretion of a slimy substance at the surface of the ectoplasm. In Difflugia, if the pseudo- podia be touched gently with a glass rod, the slime can be drawn out into threads, like the mucus of a snail (Rhumbler, 34). The adhesive power of the pseudopodia is of service both in adhering to the surface upon which they creep and in the capture of their food. The. slow-flowing amoebae, such as A. verru- cosa, do not as a rule flow round the body to be in- gested, but draw it into their interior, as if by suction. In this manner A verrucosa absorbs and devours filamentous algae (Fig. 23), which are " imported " into the interior of the body and there coiled up and digested. Rhumbler has shown that this process can be imitated by drops of fluid ; for instance, a drop of chloroform in water will draw in a thread of shellac and coil it up in its interior in a manner similar to the ingestion of an algal filament by an amoeba. FIG. 22. — Portion of an Actinosphcerium, magni- fied about 660 linear, ect., Ectoplasm with larger vacuoles ; end., endo plasm with smaller vacuoles ; N., nucleus; pa., pseudopodia; ox., delicate axial rod in the pseudopodia. After Leidy. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA 51 The pseudopodia of the filose type adhere firmly to organisms suitable for food with which they come in contact, and it can be observed that the prey is both held fast and killed by them, in- dicating that the pseudopodia secrete some toxic substance in addition to that of an adhesive nature. In the reticulose type, diatoms and organisms of various kinds are entangled in the pseudopodial network (Fig. 21), and are generally digested there also. In a few cases pseudopodia exhibit a peculiar form of movement known as nutation. An example of this is seen in the remarkable Heliozoon described by Schaudinn (43) under the name Camptonema nulans (Fig. 47), which possesses vslender axopodia in which the axial FIG. 23. — Four stages in the ingestion of an Oscillarian filament (/.) by Amoeba verrucosa. In A the amoeba has crept along the filament ; in B one end of the amoeba is bending up, and is about to fuse with the rest of the body, producing a twist in the filament ; in C two have been produced ; in D a considerable length of the filament has been drawn into the amoeba, and is twisted up into & stout coil. A, B, and G, are drawn at intervals of quarter of an hour, D several hours later. After Rhumbler (34). filament does not extend the whole length of the pseudopodium. The pseudopodia perform a slow rotating movement, and "describe the mantle of a cone, sometimes acute, sometimes obtuse, remaining stretched out straight for their entire length, and bending only at their base." Similar movements are performed by the pseudopodia of Trichosphcerium (p. 229) and Wagnerella (p. 246). In Camptonema the pseudopodia also have the power of bending suddenly when brought in contact with prey, which they capture like the tentacles of a polyp. The bending takes place beyond the point at which the axial filament ceases. Movements of this kind are transitional to those seen in flagella. (2) Flagella are vibratile thread-like extensions of the protoplasm, capable of performing very complicated lashing movements in 52 THE PROTOZOA every direction. A flagellum consists of an elastic axial core enclosed in a contractile sheath or envelope (Fig. 24), from the extremity of which the core protrudes freely in some cases, forming ?i so-called " end-piece." The flagellum takes origin from a more or less deeply-seated granule, the blepharoplast, or basal granule, which will be described in dealing with the nuclear apparatus (p. 82, infra). The elastic axis, arising from the blepharoplast, can be regarded as a form-determining element of endoplasmic origin, the sheath as an ectoplasmic motor substance. A flagellum is usually cylindrical in form, with the axial filament central in cross-section, but may be hand-like, with the axial filament at or near one edge ; it is usually of even thickness throughout its whole length, but when the axial filament is exposed to form a terminal end -piece the flagellum tapers to a fine point. Like pseudopodia, flagella serve primarily for locomotion, and secondarily for food-capture, which is effected by causing food-particles to impinge on some point or aperture at the surface of the body, where they are ingested. In their relation to locomotion two types of flagella can be distinguished, termed by Lankester pulsella and tractella respectively. A pulsellum is situated at the end of the body which is posterior in movement — that is to say, it is a flagellum which by its activity propels the body forwards. Flagella of this type occur in Oxyrrliis (p. 278) and in the Choanoflagellata (p. 271), but are comparatively rare in the Protozoa. In the majority of cases the flagella are tractella — that is to say, their action is such as to drag the body after them — hence they are situated at the end which is anterior in progression. Con- sidered generally, the movements performed by tractella are of two types. In some cases the entire flagellum is thrown into even, sinuous undulations, and the body of the flagellate progresses with a smooth, gliding movement, which may be extremely rapid, and is then well expressed by the French phrase " mouvement en fleche "; this type of movement is well seen in the trypanosomes and allied genera, such as Leptomonas, etc. In most free-living flagellates, however, the flagellum is held out stiff and straight for the proximal two-thirds or so of its length, while the distal third performs peculiar whirling or pulsating FIG. 24. — Structure of the flagellum of Euglena. ox., Axial filament ; c.p., con- tractile protoplasm enveloping the axial filament ; e.p., end - piece of the flagellum, consist- ing of the axial fila- ment exposed ; r, root of the flagel- lum passing into the body (compare Fig. 84). After Butschli (3). THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA 53 Gtf movements,* which drag the body along in a succession of more or less distinct jerks. In many flagellated organisms, forwardly-directed flagella may be combined with so-called " trailing flagella " (" Schlepp-geissel "), which are directed backwards, running along the side of the body, either quite free (Fig. 25) or united to the body by an undulating membrane (Fig. 5). In such cases the trailing flagellum is perhaps the chief organ of propulsion, acting as a pulsellum, while the forwardly-directed flagellum or flagella may function more as tactile organs or feelers than as locomotor organs. The flagellum may also serve as an organ of temporary attachment in some cases, especially in parasitic flagellates ; it then often exhibits at its distal extremity a distinct bead-like swelling or enlargement, doubtless of adhesive nature. Such terminal enlargements are sometimes seen, however, in free-swimming forms. There are many grounds for assuming the existence of a gradual transition from flagella to pseudopodia, and especially to the slender axopodia seen in Heliozoa, etc. In organs of each kind the typo of structure is essentially similar, an axis of firm elastic nature, which is pushed out from the endoplasm, in many cases from a basal granule of centrosomic nature (p. 82), and is covered over by a sheath of contractile fluid ectoplasm. The difference between them is one of degree, the axopodia being relatively shorter, in proportion to their thickness, and consequently less flexible, but the nutating and bending movements seen in axopodia are essentially similar in type to those manifested by flagella. The Heliozoa are con- nected with the Flagollata by transitional forms which indicate that their psoudo podia have arisen as modifications of flagella (p. 248). Goldschmidt, who discusses the whole question (41, pp. 116-122), de scribes in a Cercomonas-like flagellate the shorten- ing of the flagollum, and its transformation into a pseudopodium which swings to and fro. A flagollum may be considered as having arisen by modification and specialization of an axopodium, and as capable in many instances of reverting to that type of organ. (Compare also p. 465, infra.) (3) Cilia are slender, thread-like extensions of the ectoplasm which diffei from flagella mainly in three points : they are as a rule much shorter relatively to the size of the body ; they are present usually in much greater numbers, and in their most primitive type * For a detailed description and analysis of these movements, see Delage and Herouard (6), pp. 305-312. FIG. 25. — Anisonema grande, ventral view, showing the " hetero- mastigote " arrange- ment of the flagella. a./., Anterior flagel- lum ; p.f., posterior trailing flagellum ; 8, oesophagus; c.v., contractile vacuole surrounded by a number of feeding vacuoles; N., nucleus ; an., anus (cytopyge). After Stein. 64 THE PROTOZOA of arrangement form, as it were, a furry covering to the body ; and their movements are different from those of flagella. A cilium performs simple regular movements of alternate contraction and relaxation, whereby it is first bent like a bow, with a slight spiral twist (Schuberg, 44), and then becomes straightened out, again ; from this it may be inferred that the contractile substance is developed mainly on one side of the elastic axis — on that side, namely, which becomes, concave during contraction — instead of ensheathing the axis completely, as in most flagella. Then the bending of the cilium would be the result of active contractility, acting against the elasticity of the axis, which is operative in causing the cilium to straighten out again when the contractile substance is relaxed. Cilia are usually implanted in rows on the surface of the body, and their movements are co-ordinated in such a way that the con- traction— or, as it may be better termed, the pulsation — of a given cilium takes place slightly after the one in front of it, and before the one behind it (Fig. 26). On the other hand, the neighbouring cilia of adjacent rows pulsate in unison ; consequently, when a ciliated FIG. 26. — Diagram of ciliary movement, representing the successive phases of contraction and expansion in a row of cilia. After Verworn. surface is seen from above with sufficient magnification, the move- ments of the cilia produce an optical effect similar to that seen in a cornfield when the wind blowing across it gives rise to an appearance of waves following each other in a continuous succession. When, however, a row of cilia is seen in side-view, the successive beats of the cilia may produce the illusion of a rotating wheel ; hence the origin of such names as Rotifer, Trochophore, etc., applied to Metazoan organisms bearing rings or girdles of stout cilia. In spite of the apparent differences between cilia and flagella, there is no difficulty in regarding cilia as derived ancestrally from flagella by a process of modification and specialization in structure, movement, number, arrangement, and co-ordination. Like pseudo- podia and flagella, cilia may serve both for locomotion and food- capture. In many cases the cilia specialized for these two functions may be sharply distinct ; the food-capturing cilia, lound in connec- tion with the mouth and the peristomial region, are commonly much longer than the locomotor cilia, and show the tendency to form fusions presently to be described. In sedentary forms loco motor cilia may be absent in the ordinary state of the animal, and only developed temporarily during motile phases. On the other THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA 55 hand, in a purely parasitic form such as Opalina (p. 439), in which a mouth is entirely absent, only locomotor cilia are present. The chief modifications of cilia, apart from variations in size and function, are the result of a tendency to adhere or fuse together ; thus arise various types of organs, of which the most common are the cirri, membranettoe, and undulating membranes. Cirri are organs resembling bristles, formed by fusion of a tuft of cilia, just as the hairs of an ordinary camel's-hair paint-brush adhere when moistened so as to form a flexible pencil. In many cases the cirri have frayed- out ends, in which the component cilia are distinct from one another ; and reagents often cause a cirrus to break up into separate cilia. Cirri have a locomotor function, and are especially characteristic of the ciliate Infusoria which are of creeping habit (order Hypotricha, p. 440, infra). The cirri occur on the ventral surface of the body — that is to say, on the side of the body turned towards the substratum on which the organism creeps, using the cirri practically as legs. Membranellae are flapping or swinging membranes formed by fusion of two or more transverse rows of cilia implanted side by side, and adhering to form a flat membrane, the free edge of which often has a fringed or frayed border, representing the free ends of the component cilia. Membranellae occur usually in the region of the peristome in spiral rows, implanted one behind the other, and each membranella performs simple movements of alternate flexion and expansion, comparable to those of a single cil.iu m. Both in structure, origin, and movements, the membranellae must be distinguished clearly from the undulating membranes presently to be described. Undulating membranes are sheet-like extensions of the ectoplasm, which perform rippling movements, comparable to those of a sail placed edgewise to the wind ; or, better still, to the undulating movements performed by the dorsal fin of a sea-horse (Hippocampus) or a pipe-fish (Syngnathus) when swimming. The undulating mem- branes of Ciliata consist simply of a single row of cilia fused together. Such membranes are found commonly in the oesophagus of In- fusoria ; in the vestibule of Vorticellids there are two membranes of this kind. In some genera, such as Pleuronema (Fig. 27), they represent the principal food-capturing organ, and reach a great development. Pleuronema swims about by means of its cilia, and comes to rest sooner or later in a characteristic attitude, with the cilia projecting stiffly from the body ; the large undulating membrane is then protruded from the mouth, and serves by its movements to waft food-particles down the oesophagus. Undulating membranes are also of common occurrence in the Flagellata, where they are of a different type from those of Ciliata. The undulating membrane in this class is always found in connec- 5« THE PROTOZOA tion with a flagellum, and is to be regarded as a web of the ecto- plasm (periplast) connecting the flagellum to the surface of the body. Such a condition may arise either by attachment of a back- wardly-directed trailing flagellum to the side of the body, as in Trichomonas (Fig. 5) and Trypanoplasma (Fig. 36), or by the shifting backwards of the point of origin of an anterior flagellum, as is well seen in the transition from crithidial to trypanif orm phases in the development of trypanosomes (Fig. 131). As a rule, only the proximal portion of the flagellum is involved in the formation of FIG. 27. — Pleuronema chrysalis. M, The undulating membrane ; o. mouth ; N, macronucleus ; n, micronucleus ; c.v., contractile vacuole ; f.v., food vacuole ; a., anal pore. After Schewiakoff, magnified 660 diameters. the undulating membrane, and the distal portion projects freely beyond it ; but in some causes a distal free portion of the flagellum may be quite absent, and then flagellum and undulating membrane are co-extensive (Fig. 12, J). Undulating membranes in Flagellata appear to be specially related to the endoparasitic mode of life, and in free-living species they are found rarely, if ever ; they may be regarded as an adaptation to life in a broth-like medium, such as the intestinal contents, or the blood of a vertebrate, containing many suspended particles or corpuscles. In such cases the membrane may assist the organism to force its way between the solid bodies suspended in the fluid medium. Undulating membranes may, how- THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROTOZOA 57 ever, serve for other functions than that of locomotion, in flagel- lates as well as in ciliates. In large, stout forms of trypanosomes, for example, the animal may remain perfectly still while its mem- brane is rippling actively, and in that case the function of the mem- brane is probably to cause currents in the fluid surrounding the body, and to change and renew the liquid bathing the body-surface. In such a case it has been noted that the undulating membrane may from time to time reverse the direction of its movements, the waves running for a time from the hinder end forwards, and then for a time in the opposite direction (Minchin and Woodcock, 42, p. 150). It is probable that the undulating membranes which pass down the vestibule of Vorticellids can reverse their movements in a similar manner, since this passage serves both for passage of food- particles to the mouth and for the ejection of excreta from the anal pore and the contractile vacuoles. The only structures found in free-living Flagellata which can be compared at all with undulating membranes are the peculiar " collars " found in the Choanoflagellata (Fig. 110), and also in tne collar-cells of sponges. Each collar is an extension of the ecto- plasm which grows up from the edge of a circular area round the insertion of the flagellum, forming a membrane like a cuff or sleeve surrounding the basal portion of the flagellum, but quite distinct from the flagellum itself, and not formed in actual connection with it like the undulating membrane of a trypanosome. The collar differs further from a true undulating membrane in not being energetically motile, but only slowly protrusible and retractile. It has been stated, both for Choanoflagellates- and for the collar-cells of sponges, that the collar is formed by a spirally-folded membrane. Their function appears to be that of assisting in food-capture by a sessile, flagellated organism. (4) Contractile mechanisms in Protozoa, when they are visible, take the form of so-called myonemes, minute contractile fibrils run- ning in various directions in the ectoplasm, like an excessively minute system of muscle-fibres. Such elements are not found in Sarcodina or in the non-corticate forms of the other classes ; in naked forms with amoaboid movement the ectoplasm, as has been pointed out above, is only a temporary differentiation of the proto- plasmic body, which can arise by conversion of the endoplasm, and which can be changed back again into endoplasm. Myonemes occur commonly, however, in those . Flagellata, Spurozoa, or Infusoria, which owe a definite body -form to the presence of a firm cuticle or cortex, representing a stable ectoplasm. The myonemes are often, however, extremely fine, and sometimes escape detection in cases in which we can infer their presence with certainty from the move- ments or contractions of the organism or of its ectoplasm. As a 58 THE PROTOZOA general rule they are visible more or less clearly in the larger, but not in the more minute, species. Thus, in trypanosomes, myonemes can be made out in large forms as delicate lines running parallel to the undulating membrane (Fig. 28), but in small species of trypano- somes it may be impossible to discover them, although the nature of their movements may leave no doubt as to the existence of con- tractile mechanisms in the ectoplasm. In other cases, both motile species possessing myonemes and non-motile species lacking them may occur within the limits of a single group, as in Gregarines, where the motile species show a very distinct layer of myonemes (Fig. 29); while the non-motile forms have a much thinner ecto- plasm, represented practically by the cuticle alone, with no trace of myonemes. In the non-motile trophozoites of the Coccidia myo- FIG. 28. — Trypanosoma pexce, stout form stained with iron-haDmatoxylin to show myonemes. After Minchin, X 2,000. FIG. 29. — Gregarina munieri, showing the layer of myonemes at the surface of the body, slightly diagrammatic. After Schneider. nemes are similarly absent. In the ciliate Infusoria the myonemes run parallel to, and beneath, the rows of cilia, and in species of large size and great powers of contractility, such as Stentor, the myonemes are lodged in canals and show a transverse striation (Fig. 186, /). According to Schaudinn, these motile mechanisms, both flagella and myonemes, are derived from the achromatic spindle of a dividing nucleus. In the development of a trypanosome from a non-flagellated condition, he describes the entire kinetic apparatus as arising from a nuclear spindle consisting of two polar centro- somes connected by a centrodesniose (p: 103, infra), and by mantle THE ORGANIZATION OP THE PROTOZOA 59 fibres, but with chromosomes apparently rudimentary or absent. Such a spindle is stated to persist and to grow greatly In length, one pole of it finally projecting beyond the anterior end of the body. The centrosome at the proximal pole of the spindle becomes the blepharoplast or basal granule of the flagellum ; the centrodesmose itself becomes the flagellum, or at le^st its axial elastic filament ; FIG. 30. — Development of the locomotor apparatus of trypanosomes. A — F, De- velopment of Trypandsoma nocluce: A, the single nucleus of the "ookinete " is dividing into two unequal halves ; in each half a centriole is seen, connected with its twin by a centrodesmose ; B, the division of the nucleus complete ; the two sister-nuclei still connected by a centrodesmose uniting the centrioleg ; C, the smaller nucleus (n. ) is dividing unequally to furnish a third nucleus (h.g. ) ', D, E, the third nucleus is dividing to furnishTa proximal (&. and undulating membrane. As a rule ting membrane, and the kinetonucleus is smaller, in some cases very continued beyond it mmute, and has a dense compact structure, as a very short free ' flagellum posteriorly, while the trophonucleus has a vesicular struc- After ftUnchin (478), ture ; but in other cases (Trypanoplasma) the kinetonucleus is the larger of the two (Fig. 36). A nuclear differentiation of totally opposite character is seen in the Infusoria, where two nuclei of different sizes, hence termed " macronucleus " and " micronucleus,'-' are constantly present ; the behaviour of these two nuclei in relation to sexual phenomena and reproduction (vide p. 153, infra) shows that the macronucleus is composed of vegetative chromatin, while the micronucleus contains the reserve generative chr.omatin. In some cases — for example, in Myxosporidia (p. 403) — nuclei of different sizes occur in relation to sexual differences. In some Protozoa — the so-called " Monera " of Haeckel — the nucleus has been stated to be wanting entirely ; but tnis statement THE NUCLEUS 79 is probably based on incomplete or erroneous observation, or on defective technique. In all Protozoa that have been examined in recent times, at least one nucleus has been found to occur without exception, though in some phases of the development the nucleus may temporarily disappear and resolve itself into chromidia. There now remains for consideration the question of the centro- some, the centre of the kinetic activity of the nucleus. Of all the questions connected with the nuclear apparatus, those relating to the centrosome are the most difficult to handle in a general manner, largely on account of the minuteness of the bodies dealt with, and the consequent difficulty of ascertaining their structure and com- position, even their presence, in many cases. Hence, hi the litera- ture of the centrosome, there is found considerable confusion in the terminology, different authors disagreeing entirely as to the precise structures to which the name centrosome should be applied, and opposed theories, which cannot be discussed adequately in a short space, have been put forward as to the nature and origin of the centrosome. As the focus of the kinetic activities of the nucleus, the centro- some is most apparent and recognizable when the nucleus is in process of reproduction by division, and much less so when the nucleus is in the so-called "resting state." Hence the study of the nucleus during the process of division is alone decisive as to the presence of a centrosome in any given case ; and since in many cases nuclear division appears to go on without centrosomes being present, it nlay be taken as equally probable that, in all such cases at least, no centrosome is present in the resting state of the nucleus. In many cases, however, the presence of a centrosome in, or in connection with, the resting nucleus can be ascertained clearly ; it may then lie either outside or inside the nucleus. When the centrosome lies outside the nucleus, as it usually does in the cells of Metazoa, it is found typically as a minute grain or pair of grains (" diplosome ") close beside the nuclear membrane. Its presence may be indicated by the radiate structure of the surrounding protoplasm, giving the appearance of a system of rays centred on the centrosome ; but such radiations are absent as a rule during the resting state of the nucleus, and the appearance of rays is often the first sign of impending activity and division of the nucleus. In many cases the centrosome is found lying in a mass of clear protoplasm termed archoplasm, a substance which differs, apparently, from the rest of the cytoplasm only in being free from granulations of all kinds. Archoplasm may, in short, be regarded simply as pure cytoplasm, and it appears either perfectly homogeneous, or traversed by striations which radiate from the centrosome, through the archoplasm, and even beyond its limits; 80 THE PROTOZOA the striations themselves being the optical expression of a radiate arrangement of the protoplasmic alveoli (meshes of the " retic- ulum "), indicating lines of force or tension centred in the centro- some. In some cases it is probable that archoplasm showing radiate striations may be present without any centrosome. In ActinosphcBrium Hert\vig showed that rays were formed in the archoplasm before a centrosome had been formed, and heralded its appearance. When the centrosome lies within the nucleus, it is found most frequently, in Protozoa, within a plastin-body or karyosome, a position which it may retain permanently during botty the resting and dividing conditions of the nucleus. The simple nuclei of the protokaryon-type probably contain in most cases a centro- somic grain lodged in the karyosome. In a few cases, however, an intranuclear centrosome occurs without a karyosome, or outside the karyosome if one is present. On the other hand, there are many examples of the occurrence of extranuclear centrosomes in Protozoa ; but these are for the most part cases in which the centro- some is in relation, not only to the kinetic functions of the nucleus, but also to those of other cell-organs, as will be described presently. Nuclei containing centrosomes have been termed " centronuclei " by Boveri. The centrosome is seen, as a genera] rule, under the form of a minute grain, or centriole. This is the form in which it occurs invariably when it has an intranuclear position, lodged within the karyosome. But when it occurs outside the nucleus, it exhibits structural peculiarities which may vary at different periods, and it often presents cyclical changes corresponding to different phases of the activity of the nucleus. Thus, in Aclinosphcerium, Hertwig (64) describes the centrosome at its first appearance as a relatively large body of spongy structure, formed at one pole of the nucleus from extruded portions of the achromatinic reticulum (Fig. 37, A — E). At this stage, in which the centrosome is termed a centrosphere, it lies in a patch of archoplasm, and is the centre of a well-marked system of radiations. The centrosphere then gives rise, by con- densation of its substance, to two centrioles, or to one which divides, and at the same time the archoplasmic radiations become fainter and disappear (Fig. 37, F, G). The centrioles then take part in the division of the nucleus, and when this process is complete they again become spongy centrospheres, which go through the same series of successive changes that have already been described. Ana- logous cyclical changes of the centrosome have also been described in other cases, and have led to a conflict of opinion as to whether the term " centrosome " should be applied to the whole centrosomio complex, as it may be termed, or to the centrioles, of which many THE NUCLEUS 81 may be present. It is simplest in theory, and probably correct in fact, to regard the centriole as the primary, in many cases the sole, constituent of ths centrosome — an element which may be capable, to a greater or less extent, of changes in size and structure, and which multiplies by division. To the primary centrosome or FIG. 37. — Actinosphcerium eichhorni: formation of the centrosome. A, Concentra- tion of the nuclear reticulum towards one pole of the nucleus, near which the cytoplasm appears free from granulations, forming the arohoplasm ; B, G, D, passage of a portion of the nuclear reticulum to the exterior to form tho " spongy centrosome " lying in the archoplasm ; E, spongy centrosome with striations passing from it through the archoplasm to the nucleus ; F, G, tho centrosome passes back again to the vicinity of the nucleus and undergoes a reduction of substance — the archoplasm also diminishes tem- porarily in quantity ; H, division of the centrosome. After Hertwig (64). centriole there may be added adventitious elements of protoplasmic or nuclear origin, thus forming a centrosomic complex which may attain a size relatively considerable in some cases. So far the centrosome has been discussed only in its relation to 6 82 THE PROTOZOA the kinetic activities of the nucleus, a function which may be re- garded as its primary and most characteristic role. It may act also, however, as the centre of other kinetic functions of the cell- body, especially in relation to motile organs such as flagella ; it then appears as the so-called " basal granule," from which the flagella take origin. The basal granule appears as a thickening at the base of the flagellum. It may be continued farther into the cytoplasm, or connected with the nucleus, by means of one or more root-like processes known as the rhizoplast. A centrosome which is in relation to a motor cell-organ is termed generally a blepharoplast. The rhizoplast may ."" have various origins-; in some cases it represents the centrodesmose {p. 103) which connects the bleph- aroplast with the nuclear centro- some, or the remains of such a connection ; in other cases it repre- sents the remains of the nuclear spindle of the previous nuclear division, as in the swarm-spores of Stemonitis ftaccida (Jahn, 69) and FIG. 38. — Mastigina setosa, after Gold- schmidt (41). n., Nucleus from which the long flagellum arises ; the body is full of diatoms and other food- bodies. The surface of the body has a covering of short bristle-like processes. ABC FIG. 39. — Connection of the flagellum and the nucleus in Mastigina setosa. A and B, As seen in the living state ; 0, after fixation and staining. After Goldschmidt (41). the collar-cells of Heterocoela (Robertson, 79) ; while in some instances it may be formed by outgrowth of root-like processes, of no special cytological significance, from^the blepharoplast. The relation of the nuclear to the kinetic apparatus is best studied in the Flagellata, where three principal conditions may be distinguished as follows : 1. The cell-body contains but a single centrosome, which functions also as a blepharoplast ; these two names, then, denote two different phases of activity of one and the same body, whieh is a centro- THE NUCLEUS 83 some when it is active in relation to the division of the nucleus, and a blepharoplast when it is in connection with flagella or other motile organs during the resting state of the nucleus. In this, probably the most primitive state of things, there are, further, two different structural conditions found to occur in different cases. First, the centrosome - blepharoplast may be within, or closely attached to, the nucleus ; secondly, it may be quite independent of the nucleus, and some distance from it in the cell- body, during the resting state of the nucleus. In the first case — of which an example is seen in Mastigina (Figs. 38, 39), paralleled by collar - cells in the Leuco- soleniid type of calcareous sponges — the flagellum ap- pears to arise directly from the nucleus; in the second case, exemplified by Mas- tigella (Fig. 40), and by collar-cells of the Clathrinid type, the flagellum takes origin quite independently of the resting nucleus. In both cases alike, the flagel- lum generally disappears \ FJQ tQ. — Mastigdla vitrea, after before division ef the nucleus \ Goldschmidt (41). n, Nucleus, begins; the blepharoplast \ almost obscured by the mass of \ food-bodies of various kinds in becomes the centrosome, j the cytoplasm. divides, and initiates the division of the nucleus ; the new flagella of the daughter- cells grow out from the two daughter - centres omes dur- ing or after division of the nucleus, and in either case, when the two daughter-cells are completely formed, their centro- somes, as blepharoplasts, remain as the basal 'granules from which the flagella arise. 2. The cell-body contains more than one body of centrosomic nature — namely, a definitive centrosome, in relation to the single nucleus, and, in addition to this, one or more blepharoplasts in relation to motile organs. Then, when division of the cell takes place, one of two things may happen. 84 THE PROTOZOA In the first place, the flagellum or flagella may disappear, together with their blepharoplasts ; the nuclear centrosome divides into two, which control the division of the nucleus in the usual way, and the centrosome of each daughter-nucleus divides again into two, one of which is the definitive centrosome, the other the blepharo- plast, of the daughter-cell. The new flagella may either grow out from the daughter-centrosomes before they divide, and be carried off, as it were, by the product of division which becomes the FIG. 41. — Stages in the division of Spongomonas splendida, to show different ways in which the daughter-flagella arise. Compare the stages of S. uvetta (Fig. 42). A, Resting condition ofothe cell. B, Early stage of mitosis; the two flagella of the parent cell are in process of absorption, together with their blepharo- plasts. G, Daughter-flagella arising at the poles of the nuclear spindle ; the flagella of the parent have disappeared. D, Nucleus completely divided ; one pair of daughter-flagella are seen arising from the karyosome of a daughter- nucleus, in which the blepharoplasts are still enclosed ; in the other daughter- nucleus the blepharoplasts have become distinct and the flagella are given off from them. E, Similar stage ; the two pairs of blepharoplasts, from which the flagella arise, are quite independent of the two daughter-nuclei. After Hartmann and Chagas (62), magnification about 2,400 diameters. blepharoplast (Fig. 41, (7, D, E ; Fig. 42, (7), or they may not arise from the blepharoplasts until a later period, after they have separated off from the definitive centrosomes (Fig. 42, D, E, F). The examples figured show that these differences in the origin of the flagella may occur as developmental variations in one and the same species. In the second place, the blepharoplasts and flagella may persist throughout the division of the cell ; then either the old flagellum and blepharoplast are retained by one daughter-cell, while the other THE NUCLEUS 85 forms a new blepharoplast from its centrosome, and subsequently a new flagellum ; or the blepharoplast of the parent cell divides independently to form the blepharoplasts of the daughter-cells (Fig. 43). In this last type, the blepharoplast, though obviously a body of centrosomic nature, acquires a more or less complete independence of the definitive centrosome, and becomes a distinct cell-organ, permanent for at least a certain number of cell-genera- tions ; it may multiply and undergo various structural complica- tions, to be described presently. FIG. 42. — Stages in the division of Spongomonas uvetta. A, Resting condition of the cell ; two flagella arise, each from one of a pair of blepharoplasts (diplo- some) ; the nucleus contains a large karyosomo, in which the centriole is lodged, and a few irregular grains of peripheral chromatin in the nuclear cavity. B, Early stage of mitosis ; an achromatinic spindle is formed with the centrioles at tho poles, one centriole (on the right) having already divided into two ; the chromatin, both peripheral and central, has united to form a dense equatorial plate in which separate chromosomes cannot be discerned ; the flagella have disappeared, together with their blepharoplasts. C, Similar stage in which the daughter-flagella are growing out precociously from the centrioles, one on the left, two on the right. D, Later stage in which the equatorial plato has split into two daughter-plates, but no flagella have as yet grown out from the centrioles, of which there are two at each pole. E, Division of the nucleus nearly complete ; no flagella. F, Nucleus completely divided, daughter-nuclei in process of reconstruction ; from each a pair of blepharoplasts has been budded off, still connected by a centrodesmose with tho contriole contained in the karyosome ; a pair of daughter-flagella has arincn from one pair of blepharoplasls, but not as yet from the other. After H.u tin. MIII and Chagas (02), magnification about 2,400. o. In certain flagellates — for example, trypanosomes and allied forms (" Biuucloata ") — the cell-body contains two nuclei, as already noted : a trophonucleus and a kinetonucleus. To what extent these nuclei are provided with centrosomes is at present a little doubtful ; probably this point is one which varies in different cases (compare Wenyon, 84). There are, however, three chief possi- bilities : (a) There may be but a single centrosome, that of the kinetonucleus, which acts both as blepharoplast and division-centre FIG. 43. — Stages in the division of Pdytomdla agilis. A, Resting condition of the cell ; the four flagella arise from four blepharoplasts which are connected by a rhizoplast with the- nucleus ; in the nucleus is seen a large karyosome, which contains the centriole and is surrounded by a peripheral zone of chromatin-grains in a nuclear reticulum. B, Early stage of mitosis ; the karyo- some is dividing to form a bar of chromatin occupying the axis of the achro- matinic spindle, at the equator of which a plate of chromosomes is formed by the peripheral chromatin of the last stage. C, Later stage ; the karyosome has divided completely, forming two masses at the poles of the spindle con- nected by a centrodesmose. D, The spindle has become elongated, and the equatorial plate has split ; the centrioles are seen connected by the centro- desmose. E, Division advancing ; the polar masses have become cap-shaped, and the daughter-plates of chromosomes have fused into conical masses ; centrioles and centrodesmose still visible. F, Division of body beginning. O, Centrodesmose broken through, the two daughter-nuclei separate. //, /, J, Division of cell complete, one daughter-cell only represented, to show the reconstitution of the daughter-nucleus ; the polar cap becomes the karyosome, enclosing the centriole ; the conical mass formed in Stage E by fusion of the chromosomes in the daughter-plates becomes resolved gradually into chromatin-grains again, and so forms the peripheral zone of the daughter- nucleus ; each daughter-cell has two of the four blepharoplasts and flagella of the parent, and the number is doubtless made up to four again by division after the daughter-cells are set free. After Aragao (45). THE NUCLEUS 87 for the cell ; then, when cell-division takes place, the kinetonucleus first divides, and the two products of its division place themselves on each side of the trophonucleus and act as its centrosomes, as described by Franca and Athias (56)* ; (6) the trophonucleus may have a centrosome of its own, lodged in the karyosome, in addition to the centrosome-blepharoplast in connection with the kineto- nucleus ; this is probably the most usual condition with two sub- ordinate variations, according as the centrosome-blepharoplast is lodged within the kinetonucleus, as in Leishmania tropica (Wenyon, 84), or is situated close beside it, as in most trypanosomes ; in either case the kinetonucleus.and trophonucleus divide quite independently of one another, as commonly seen ; (c) it is possible, but perhaps not very probable, that hi some cases there may be a blepharoplast for the flagellum distinct from the centrosomes of the two nuclei ; such a condition, perhaps, occurs in Trypanoplasma. In all cases alike, division is initiated by the centrosome from which the flagellum arises; next the kinetonucleus, and lastly the tropho- nucleus, divide. The various forms of flagollar insertion described in the foregoing para- graphs admit of a simple and uniform phylogenetic explanation. Starting with a non-flagellated organism in which a simple protokaryon contains a single centriole (Fig. 44, O3), we may suppose the flagellum at its first origin to grow out from the centriole in the nucleus (0b). No such condition is actually known amongst flagellates, though it may be compared to the origin of the axopodia from a central grain in an Actinophrys-type of Heliozoon (see below) ; in the flagellates the centrosome-blepharoplast always, ap- parently, moves out of the nucleus, either remaining in close proximity to it (la) or becoming quite independent of it (lb), the two variations of the first type. The second, type may be derived by division of the centrosome-blepharo- plast to form the definitive centriole and the blepharoplast ; the latter may also remain in close proximity to the nucleus (2a) or become quite independent of it (2b). The third type may be supposed to arise from the hypothetical primitive condition (0°) by supposing that, not the blepharoplast-centrosome alone, but the whole nucleus, divides to form two nuclei of unequal size and distinct function, the trophonucleus and kinetonucleus, each with its own centriole (3a, 3b). The centriole of the kinetonucleus, which is at the same time the blepharoplast, may either remain within the kinetonucleus (3b) or come out of it (3C) ; its relations to the kinetonucleus are parallel to those of the centro- some-blepharoplast to the nucleus in types la and lb. Or, on the other hand, the centrosome-blepharoplast may divide into a definitive kinetonuclear centrosome and a true blepharoplast (3*). The condition with only a single centriole for both the nuclei may, if it exists, be derived from 3a or 3b by supposing that the trophonuclear centrosome becomes atrophied. When a blepharoplast exists independently of the nuclear apparatus, it may retain the form of a single grain or basal granule of the flagellum, when this organ is single, or it may multiply to * The statements of Franca and Athias are not, however, confirmed by Lebedeff (468), and it may be doubted whether any species of trypanosome or other " binu- cleate " exists which has but a single division-centre in the cell. 88 form two or more grains when there are numerous flagella. Thus, in Lophomona?, which shows the extreme of complication, there are numerous basal granules corresponding to the tuft of flagella (Fig. 45). Each basal granule in this case is divided into a proximal Fio. 44. — Diagrammatic representation of the possible phylogcnetic origin of the different types of fiagellar attachment in liagellates. For the sake of sim- plicity it is supposed that the animal has but a single ilagellum. O\ Nori- ilagellated cell with a centriole in the nucleus ; Ob, in a cell like the last a flagellum arises from the centriole ; 1", condition with a (lagellum arising close beside the nucleus ; lb, condition with the blepharoplast quite separate from the nucleus ; 2a, division of the single centriole into a definitive centro- some and a blcpharoplast, which becomes quite independent (2b) of the nucleus ; 3a, division of both nucleus and centriole to form distinct kinetic and trophic nuclei, each with its own centriole ; 3b, the kinetonuclear centriole remains within the nucleus ; 3C, the kinetonuclear centriole becomes distinct from the nucleus ; 3d, condition with a single centriole in the cell ; 3e, condition with a blepharoplast distinct from the centrioles of the two nuclei. and a distal granule, and the pairs of granules are arranged in a ring, interrupted at one point ; the tuft of flagella takes origin from the distal granules of the ring. When the nucleus divides, the daughter-centrosomes give rise to new rings of blepharoplasts, THE NUCLEUS 89 from which daughter-tufts of flagella grow out ; the old tufts, with their rings of blepharoplasts, persist for some time after the new ones have been formed (Fig. 45, C), but ultimately they degenerate and disappear. The ring of blepharoplasts in Lophomonas is 3 fl c'C 05 »j S^*» CCj fi&zJji 3 ftg'g^^ n " - J m >. « •M^? d -^ o"3 ** w ~ a »3 o sMSrfJ^la9 g&S-SS^ •73 t8 c8^ .^4 |S2^^^ -SO;^ •§".3 d jj •-< ^ *rJ <* «« _§ ^ Q ^ TO ^^-5 j«*sa o-js „» 5 ^gsi-g-B5^ a? S^'SOS™ if I** pill flhrs^I: 'IKK*1 a°ilftsi- IHlfnjj irf«"8ria Lll&Srf"! s^|lll 0 •; cs 3 "— .«§ H-S af*3 ^"Blc1 S * § •§ , •&« cS^g Q >>* O t_^ illll 2^s S Js* a 2!* -I SaS*l T;=5^S •^ a 5^ supported on the edge of a membranous structure, or " calyx," which in its turn is surrounded by a peculiar striated body, the " collar " of Grassi, or " parabasal apparatus " of Janicki (Fig. 45, d.). Janicki (71) has found a corresponding parabasal apparatus in other flagellates, especially in Tridtonymphidce ; the significance 90 THE PROTOZOA of this peculiar structure remains for the present problematical. In the spores of Derbesia, Davis (" Annals of Botany," xxii., pp. 1-20, plates i. and ii.) has described a condition very similar to that of Lophomonas — namely, a double ring of blepharoplasts, which, however, fuse together to form a ring of homogeneous appearance. The blepharoplast-graina are given off from the nucleus. Centrosomic bodies may be related, not only to flagella, but also to pseudopodia, especially in those cases in which the pseudopodia FiG. 46. — Actinophrys sol, showing the axial filaments of the pseudopodia centred on the nucleus. N, Nucleus; pa., pseudopodia; ox., axial filament; c.v., contractile vacuole ; /.«., food-vacuole. After Grenacher. have become specialized in form and movement, as in the Heliozoa. In this group the relationship of the nuclear apparatus to the pseudopodia exhibits two types of arrangement, which are analo- gous to the two arrangements described above in Mastigina and Mastigdla respectively, and which may be explained by supposing that in the one case the kinetic centre lies within, in the other case without, the nucleus itself. Thus, in Actinophrys (Fig. 46) the numerous pseudopodia are all centred on the single nucleus, in which the centrosome is contained. A variation of this type is described by Schaudinn (43), in the peculiar multinucleate form THE NUCLEUS 91 Camptonema nutans, in which a pseud opodium arises directly from each nucleus (Fig. 47).* In Acanthocystis (Fig. 18) an example is seen of the second type, the evolution of which can be traced in the actual development ; in the buds of Acanthocystis a centriole is contained in the karyosome of the nucleus, but during the growth of the bud into the adult condition the centriole passes out of the nucleus, and becomes the so-called " central grain " of the adult, a corpuscle which occupies the centre of the body, and upon which * In Aclinosphcerium, however, there is no relationship between the pseudopodia and the nuclei. From the researches of Hertwig (64), it is evident that in this form the centrosomes are lost altogether during the vegetative life, and are formed only in certain phases of the development (p. 115). 92 THE PROTOZOA the axial filaments of the pseudopodia are centred, while the nucleus is displaced to one side and becomes excentric in position ; when the cell enters upon division, the central grain becomes the centro- some (Fig. 64). From the condition seen in Acanthocystis, it is not difficult to explain the state of things which has been described by Zuelzer (86) in the remarkable form WagnereUa (p. 246). Here also the buds formed possess each a single nucleus containing a centriole ; in this condition they may multiply by fission with mitosis, in which the centriole functions as a centrosome. When the buds develop into the adult form, a centriole is extruded from the nucleus to form the central grain. The organism attaches itself, and the body becomes divided into three regions — head, stalk, and basal plate (Fig. 48). The nucleus travels down into the basal plate, while the central grain remains in the head and functions as the kinetic centre of the pseudopodia, becoming very complicated in structure. It consists of a centrosome surrounded by a sphere, which is perhaps of the nature of archoplasm, but is stated to be rich in plastin ; when the pseudopodia are extended tho sphere shows well- marked radial striatioiis. From the centrosome minute granules are budded off, which pass along the atriations of the sphere to its surface, and from these granules arise the delicate axial filaments of the pseudopodia ; the basal granules are therof oro comparable to the ring of blepharoplasts in Lophomonas. When the pseudopodia are retracted, the basal granules lie within the sphere, immediately surrounding the centrosome, a-nd the radial striations of the sphere vanish. The centrosome itself varies in structure at different times, going through cyclical changes, but usually shows a distinct central granule or centriole. When Wagneretta divides by fission, the central grain and the nucleus divide independently, and the central grain does not act as a centrosome for the dividing nucleus, which contains its own centriole. In this form, therefore, the central grain, though centrosomic in origin and nature, loses its primitive relation to the division of the nucleus, and becomes specialized exclusively as a kinetic centre for the organs of locomotion, a course of evolu- tion perfectly parallel to that which has been traced above for the blepharo- plasts in their relation to flagella. While there can be but little doubt as to the centrosomic nature of the blepharoplasts or basal granules of the flagella, and of the central grains on which the pseudopodia of the Heliozoa are centred, the true nature of the basal grains of cilia, on the other hand, is less certain. The majority of those who have studied them in Ciliata are of opinion that they have nothing to do with centro- somes (compare Maier, 73, and Schuberg, 44, and see p. 443, infra) ; but there are certain observations which indicate that the basal granules of the cilia have a connection with (Collin, 50), or an origin from (Entz, 53), the nuclear apparatus, in which case they may be of the same nature as the multiple blepharoplasts of such a form as Lophomonas. Hertwig (66) considers that the basal grains of the cilia may be of centrosomic nature, and that, if they have no connection with the nucleus, they afford support for the view that centrosomes can arise from the cytoplasm as well as from the nuclear framework. In view of the great structural similarity between cilia and flagella in other respects, it seems THE NUCLEUS 93 hardly likely that the basal granules would be of a different nature in the two cases. The whole question of the nature of the basal granules has been discussed in a recent memoir by Erhard (54). FIG. 48. — Wagneretta borealis, Mercschk. A, Whole specimen seen under a low magnification: H., head containing the central grain ; P, stalk ; N., nucleus contained in the basal plate of attachment. B, Enlarged view of the head, after fixation and staining with iron-haema- toxylin : c., cuticle of the stalk ; ps., pseudopodia ; ax., axial filaments of the pseudopodia, each arising from a basal granule ; e.g., central grain. After /\ Zuelzer (86). Few problems in cytology have been more discussed than the question of the nature and origin of the centrosome, and three opposed views have been put forward which may be termed, re- spectively, the achromatinic theory, the nucleolo - centrosomic theory, and the nuclear theory. 94 THE PROTOZOA According to the achromatinic theory, the centrosome is " an individualized portion of the achromatinic nuclear substance " (Hertwig, 66), a kinetic centre on which the movements of the framework are focussed. The essential and primary constituent of the centrosome is the centriole, and so long as the centrosome remains intranuclear, as in perhaps the majority of Protozoa, it consists of the centriole alone. When, however, the centrosome becomes extranuclear, as in many Protozoa and almost universally H Fio. 49. — Paramoeba etihardi : stages of the life-cycle. A, Amoeba in the vegetative stage: N., nucleus; n.k., " Nebenkern " ; d., ingested diatom. B, G, D, Stages in the multiplication of the encysted amoeba ; in B the Nebenkern has divided up, the nucleus is still undivided ; in 0 the nucleus has divided up into a number of daughter-nuclei, each of which has paired with a daughter- Nebenkern ; in D the body has divided into a number of daughter-cells, each containing a nucleus and a Nebenkern. E, A free-swimming flagellula, derived from one of the daughter-cells in D, and containing a nucleus and a Nebenkern. F, G, H, I, Four stages of the division of a flagellula ; in F the Nebenkern is dividing ; in 0 the two halves of the Nebenkern have placed themselves on each side of the nucleus, which is preparing for division ; H, stage of the nuclear spindle with the two halves of the Nebenkern at each pole ; in / the nuclear division is nearly complete, and the body is beginning to divide. After Schaudinn (81), all figures magnified about 500 diameters. in the cells of the higher animals and plants, accessory cytoplasmic elements may be added to the centriole to form a centrosomic complex. A point still undecided, on the theory that centrosomes are of achromatinic origin, is whether or no these bodies can be formed, in some cases, in the cytoplasm also, as maintained by some authorities. On Hertwig's view, mentioned above, that the achromatinic substance of the nucleus is identical in nature with the ground-substance of the general protoplasm, it follows that material for the formation of the centrosome must be present in the cyto- THE NUCLEUS 95 plasm no less than in the nucleus. Biitschli (3) considers it possible that the centrosome might have been originally a cytoplasmic structure, which had nothing to do with the nucleus, but became included in it when a nuclear membrane was formed. Attention must be drawn here to the remarkable genus Paranueba (Fig. 49) founded by Schaudinn for the species P. eilhardi (see p. 228). In this form there is present beside the nucleus a body which was termed the " Neben- kern," consisting of a darkly-staining middle piece, at each end of which is a cap of clear substance. The Nebenkern has generally been considered to represent a centrosome, and Chatton (49) has put forward the suggestion that it may correspond to a karyosome or a portion of a karyoaome that has passed out of the nucleus with the centrosome. Recently, however, Janicki (71'5) has described two new species of Paramceba, and puts quite a different interpretation upon the Nebenkern. He regards the middle piece as chro- matin, the clear caps as archoplasmic masses, each of which contains a centrosome ; and he considers the entire structure " as a second nucleus, as it were, fixed in division, in which the state of division has become the permanent form." He proposes to replace Schaudinn's term " Nebenkern " by the term " nucleus secundus," and considers it especially comparable to the " sphere " of Noctiluca (Fig. 65). Division of the nucleus and Nebenkern takes place quite independently of one another. On the nucleolo-centrosomic theory, the whole karyosome with the contained centriole, as found in many Protozoa, is compared with the complex extranuclear centrosome of the higher organisms. It is clear, however, that the karyosome consists chiefly of plastin which is impregnated to a greater or less extent with chromatin, and in which the centriole is imbedded. As Chatton (49) has pointed out, the three elements which compose the karyosome are independent of each other. When the centriole and chromatin have left the karyosome, the plastin-mass remaining behind is homologous in every way with the nucleolus of the metazoan cell, and the only element common to both the karyosome of Protozoa and the centrosome of Metazoa is the centriole. The nuclear theory of the centrosome is associated especially with the names of Schaudinn and, in more recent times, of Hart- mann and Prowazek (63). According to this view, the centrosome represents a second cell-nucleus, and every cell is to be regarded as primarily binucleate. The starting-point of the evolutionary series would be such a form as Amoeba binudeata, which possesses two similar and equivalent nuclei. In the next stage of evolution one of the two nuclei became specialized more for kinetic, the other for trophic, functions ; examples of this stage would be furnished by Paramceba (Fig. 49), with its nucleus and " Nebenkern," and by a trypanosome, with its trophonucleus and kinetonucleus, the Nebenkern of the first and the kinetonucleus of the second repre- senting the kinetic nucleus. The central grain of the Heliozoa or the extranuclear centrosome of the Metazoa would represent the final stage of evolution, namely, a kinetic nucleus deprived of all 90 THE PROTOZOA chromatin -elements ; while the cell-nucleus proper would represent the trophic nucleus deprived of all kinetic elements. On the other hand, the condition in amoebae and similar or- ganisms, where the cell appears to contain but a single nucleus which includes the kinetic centres, is explained by supposing that here the kinetic nucleus is encapsuled in the trophic nucleus, and is represented by the karyosome with its centriole ; hence the supporters of this theory term the type of nucleus characterized by a large karyosome an " amphinucleus " or " amphikaryon," and, in their descriptions of such nuclei, they speak of the outer nucleus (peripheral zone of chromatin) and the inner nucleus (karyosome). The reasons against homologizing the karyosome and the extra- nuclear centrosome have been stated already. Against the theory of binuclearity it may be urged further — First, that to regard the protokaryon-type of nucleus seen in the most primitive forms of Sarcodina and Flagellata as a secondary condition is a complete inversion of what is, to all appearance, the natural series of evolu- tion of the nuclear apparatus ; secondly, that the binucleate con- dition of trypanosomes and allied forms is clearly, by comparison with other Flagellates, a specialized condition ; the trophonucleus of trypanosomes also contains a karyosome and centriole, and would therefore be an " amphikaryon," on this theory ; thirdly, that the binuclear theory still leaves the centriole as a kinetic centre of achromatinic origin, which is present in both trophonucleus and kinetomicleus of trypanosomes, in both nucleus and central grain of Heliozoa (Wagnerella), etc. All that the binuclear theory is capable of explaining is the secondary elements of the extra- nuclear centrosomic complex. That the centriole is a body of intranuclear origin and formation is shown clearly by its presence in nuclei of the primitive karyosomatic type which arise, not by division of pre-existing nuclei, but by aggregation and organization of clumps of chromidia. It should be added that, in its most recent exposition by Hartmann (61), the theory of binuclearity has undergone considerable modification and restriction. Having considered now the structure and composition of the nucleus in its principal types and morphological variations, it remains to attempt to establish a more precise conception as to what exactly is meant by a nucleus. It is evident, in the first place, that the essential component of a nucleus, never absent, is chromatin ; but it is equally clear, in the second place, that a simple mass, or several such masses, of chromatm, do not by themselves constitute a nucleus in the true sense of the word. The word " chro- matin" connotes an essentially physiological and biological con- ception, as it were, of a substance, far from uniform in its chemical THE NUCLEUS 97 nature, which has certain definite relations to the life-history and vital activities of the cell. The word " nucleus," on the other hand, as many authorities and more recently Dobell (52) have pointed out, is essentially a morphological conception, as of a body, con- tained in the cell, which exhibits a structure and organization of a certain complexity, and in which the essential constituents, the chromatin-particles, are distributed, lodged, and maintained, in the midst of achromatinic elements which exhibit an organized arrangement, variable- in different species, but more or less constant in the corresponding phases of the same species. If this standpoint be accepted, and the nucleus be regarded as an essentially morpho- logical conception, it seems to me remarkable that Dobell, in his valuable memoir on the cytology of the bacteria, should apply the term " nucleus " to a single grain of chromatin, or to a collection of such grains, and should speak of a nucleus "in the form of ehromidia scattered through the cell," or " in the form of a discrete system of granules (ehromidia)," phrases which are self-contra- dictory on the principles that he himself has laid down. We are confronted, nevertheless, with a considerable difficulty when we attempt to state exactly what amount of organization and structural complexity is -essential to the morphological concep- tion of a nucleus. If, as is probable in phylogeny, and certainly occurs frequently in ontogeny (compare Fig. 32), the nucleus arises from a primitive chromidial condition of scattered, unorganized chromatin, at what point does the mass cease to be a chromidium and become a nucleus ? This is a question very difficult to answer at present, a verbal and logical difficulty such as occurs in all cases where a distinction has to be drawn between two things which shade off, the one into the other, by infinite gradations, but which does not, nevertheless, render such distinctions invalid, any more than the gradual transition from spring to summer does away with the distinction between the seasons. Hartmann and his school consider the possession of a centriole as the criterion of a nucleus (see Nagler, 76) ; but it cannot be considered as established, in the present state of knowledge, that all nuclei have centrioles or centrosomes. All that can be said is that, as soon as a mass or a number of particles of chromatin begin to concentrate and separate themselves from the surrounding protoplasm, with formation of distinct nuclear sap and appearance of achromatinic supporting elements, we have the beginning at least of that definite organiza- tion and structural complexity which is the criterion of a nucleus as distinguished from a chromidial mass. In the first chapter of this book a distinction was drawn between organisms of the " cellular " grade, with distinct nucleus and cytoplasm, and those of the " bacterial " grade, in which the 7 98 THE PROTOZOA cliromatin does not form a distinct nucleus. In all Protozoa there is a true nucleus in at least the principal stages of the life-history, and it is obvious that the recognition of a cellular grade, charac- terized by the possession of a true nucleus, postulates that the first origin and evolution of the nucleus must be sought amongst those organisms which have been classed, speaking broadly, as the bacterial grade. We may expect, therefore, to find in organisms which stand on the plane of morphological differentiation which characterizes the bacteria the early stages of the evolution of the nucleus from the primitive chromidial condition, and even cases in which the condition of a true nucleus has been reached. The matter cannot be discussed further here, where it must suffice to establish the existence of true nuclei in Protozoa ; but Dobell (52) has described an interesting series of conditions which may be regarded as stages in the evolution of nuclei amongst bacterial organisms. Since the possession of a true nucleus has been regarded here as the criterion of the cellular grade of organization, it is necessary to discuss briefly the meaning and application of the term " cell." By many, perhaps most modern writers, the cell has been regarded as the elementary vital unit, than which there exists nothing simpler amongst living beings. In this sense the word " cell " becomes synonymous with the term " micro-organism," "protist," or any other word used to denote living beings of the most primitive type: " tout ce qui vit n'est que cettules " (Delage and H6rouard, 6). The word " cell'" was, however, applied originally to the elements that built up the tissues of animals and plants. At first, as the word cdl implies, it was used to denote only the enclosing membrane or framework ; but when it became apparent that the membrane was of secondary importance, it was transferred to the contained stuff, and so came to signify a structural element in which the living substance, protoplasm, is differentiated into two distinct parts — nucleus and cytoplasm. If the term " cell " is not to become so vague and indefinite in its significance as to be absolutely meaning- less, it is best to restrict its application to living organisms which have reached this degree of differentiation. Dobell considers that all Protista are nucleated organisms ; in the preceding paragraphs reasons have been advanced against accepting this proposition as a statement of fact, and from the point of view of phylogenetic speculation, I, at least, find it difficult to believe that the earliest form of life could have been an organism in which the living sub- stance was differentiated ab initio into distinct nucleus and cyto- plasm. In my opinion the cell, as defined above — that is to say, an organism in which the living substance, protoplasm, has become THE NUCLEUS 99 differentiated into two parts, a nucleus, in the morphological sense, distinct from the cytoplasm — does not represent the primary and universal form of the living organism or unit, but is to be con- sidered as a stage in the evolution of living beings, a stage which many living beings have not reached. Thus a bacterial type of organism, in which the chromatin is scattered through the proto- plasmic body in the form of chromidial granules, and which there- fore does not possess a true nucleus, is not to be regarded as a cell, but as representing a condition antecedent to the evolution of the true cellular type of structure. In all Protozoa, on the other hand, the entire plan of the organization is founded on the type of the cell, which is to be regarded as the starting-point in the evolu- tion of the entire animal and vegetable kingdoms (compare Min- chin, 75). This point will be discussed further in a. subsequent chapter (p. 464). Bibliography. — For references see p. 477. CHAPTER VII THE REPRODUCTION OF THE PROTOZOA THE methods by which reproduction is effected amongst the Protozoa vary greatly in matters of detail, as will be seen ; but the obvious diversity in method throws into greater relief the under- lying unity in principle. In Protozoa, as in Protista generally, reproduction takes place always by means of some form of fission — that is to say, division or cleavage of the body into two or more parts, which are set free as the daughter-individuals. An essential part of the process is the partition amongst the daughter-individuals of at least some part of the chromatin-substance possessed by the parent. Hence fission of the cell-body as a whole is always pre- ceded by division of the nucleus ; and if chromidia are present, they also are divided amongst the products of the fission of the body. On the other hand, division of the nucleus is not necessarily followed at once by division of the body. Considering the methods by which fission is effected from a general standpoint, we may distinguish three chief types of repro- duction, each of which may show subordinate variations : 1. Division of the nucleus, or, if there are two differentiated nuclei, division of each of them, is followed by division of the body ; this is the commonest and most typical mode of reproduction, tnown as simple or binary fission. 2. Division of the nucleus or of each of two differentiated nuclei is not followed immediately by corresponding divisions of the body, but may be repeated several times, and so give rise to a multi- nucleate condition of the body, which may be — (a) Temporary, and soon followed by cleavage of the body into as many daughter-individuals as there are nuclei or pairs of dif- ferentiated nuclei; this method is known as multiple fission (Fig. 127) ; or it may be — (b) Permanent, giving rise to a multinucleate body which is termed a plasmodium. Then division of the body may take place at any time by cleavage of the body into two or more multinucleate parts ; this process is known as plasmotomy. Ultimately, however, in all cases a plasmodium breaks up by multiple fission into uni- 100 THE REPRODUCTION OF THE PROTOZOA 101 nucleate individuals at the end of a longer or shorter vegetative existence during which it may have multiplied frequently by plasmotomy. The process of fission must now be considered in more detail, beginning with — 1. Division of the Nucleus. — As in the case of the cell-body as a whole, the division of the nucleus is effected in various ways. Probably the most primitive type is that in which the nucleus becomes resolved into chromidia, from which, again, secondary daughter-nuclei are reconstituted. This type of division may be termed " ch) omidial fragmentation." It is of comparatively rare occurrence, but examples of it are found among Sarcodina and Sporozoa. In Echinopyxis two daughter-nuclei are formed in this way (Hertwig, 66, p. 8). In other cases numerous daughter-nuclei may arise, as in the formation of the nuclei iff the microgametes in Coccidium (Fig. 50), where the" parent nucleus gives off into the cytoplasm a fine dust of chromidial particles which travel to the surface of the cell and become concentrated at a number of spots to form the daughter-nuclei. True nuclear division, in which the parent and daughter-nuclei retain throughout the process their individuality and distinctness from the cytoplasm, must be distinguished clearly from the above- mentioned process of chromidial fragmentation. Fn the vast majority of cases the nucleus divides into two halves by simple or binary fission, which, as already stated, may be repeated several times before cell-division takes place ; but in a few cases the j iAioleus divides simultaneously into a number of portions by m Uiple fission. In the cells of Metazoa true nuclear division alone occurs, and may follow one or the other of two sharply-marked types, termed comprehensively direct and indirect. In direct division the nucleus is constricted simply into two parts, without circumstance or ceremony. In indirect division, on the other hand, the nucleus goes through a complicated series of changes, following each other in a definite order and sequence, the whole process being known as karyokinesis or mitosis. In spite, however, of the intricate nature of karyokinetic division, and the variations in matters of detail that it exhibits in different cases, the whole process is perfectly uniform in its general plan, and admits of being described without difficulty in generalized terms. Such a description is found in every textbook of biology at the present time, and need not be repeated here ; it will be sufficient to analyze briefly the more important events that take place. In the process of karyokinesis, the achromatinic elements of the nucleus furnish the active mechanisms, while the chromatin-sub- 102 THE PROTOZOA stance appears to be the passive subject of the changes that are effected. With the achromatinic nuclear elements, extranuclear cytoplasmic substances, such as archoplasm, may collaborate. After Fio. 60. — Formation of microgametes in Coccidium schvbergi. A, Full-grown microgametocyte, with finely-granular cytoplasm and large nucleus con- taining a conspicuous karyosome ; freed from the host-cell. B, The nuclear membrane has disappeared, and the chromatin, in the form of minute chro- midial granules, is passing out into the cell. C, The chromidia have collected at the periphery of the body ; the karyosome is left at the centre, and has become pale through loss of chromatin-substance. D, The chromidia, seen on the surface of the body, are collecting together into irregular streaks and clumps. E, The chromatin -streaks of the preceding stage are collecting together into patches. F, The patches of chromatin of the preceding stage have become dense and closely pacfced. 0, H, The patches of chromatin take on a definite form as the future nuclei of the miccogametes. /, Two flagella grow out from close to each microgamete-nucleus, and by their activity the microgametes, consisting almost entirely of chromatin, break loose from the body of the gametocyte and swim away. J, Three micro- gametes, more highly magnified ; in each, two flagella arise from the thicker find ; one of the flagella (the shorter) becomes free at once, the other (the longer) runs along the body and becomes free at the hinder end. n., Nucleus, k, karyosome, of the microgametocyte ; n', n', nuclei of the microgametes. After Schaudinn (99); A— E magnified 1,000, F—I magnified 1,500, J magnified 2,250. disappearance, as a rule, of the nuclear membrane the achromatinic substance, or the combination of achromatinic and archoplasmic 103 elements, assumes a characteristic bipolar form, like a spindle. At each pole of the spindle a centrosome or centriole is to be found, as a general rule. The two centrosomes have arisen by division of the originally single centrosome, and may remain for some time connected by a fibril or by a system of fibrils, forming what is often termed a ' ' central spindle," but is better named a centrodesmosc. The axis of the achromatinic spindle is formed by the centrodesmose, if it persists, and the remainder of the spindle is constituted by the so- called ' ' mantle-fibres ' ' running from pole to pole. The mantle-fibres are derived from the achromatinic reticulum of the nucleus and the archoplasm ; they are probably in most cases the optical expression of an arrangement of the protoplasmic alveoli in longitudinal rows, under the influence of tensions or forces centred at the poles of the spindle. Such an arrangement of the alveoli produces the optical appearance of fibrils connected by cross-junctions, the apparent fibril being formed by thickened walls of alveoli in line with one another, while the cross-junctions are the transverse walls between consecutive alveoli. On this view the apparent fibrils of the achro- matinic spindle are in reality merely the indication of lines of force in the protoplasmic framework ; but some authorities consider that in certain cases at least true fibrils are formed, which may be isolated from each other and without cross-connections (Hertwig, 64). The spindle-fibres, whether real or apparent, are centred at the poles of the spindle on the centrosomes, from which other striations may radiate out in all directions through the archo- plasmic masses (" attraction-spheres "), and extend into the sur- rounding cytoplasm. While the achromatinic spindle-figure is in process of formation, the chromatin of the nucleus has gone through a series of changes which may differ in different cases, but which result in the forma- tion of a number of masses of chromatin termed chromosomes. The number, size, and shape, of the chromosomes vary greatly in dif- ferent species, but in Metazoa these characters are generally con- stant for the corresponding phases of the same species. Each chromosome, when formed, consists of a great number of minute grains of chromatin, chromidiosomes, cemented together in a matrix or ground-substance of plastin. The chromosomes arrange them- selves at the equator of the achromatinic spindle in the form of a plate, hence termed the equatorial plate. The nucleolus disappears, being absorbed or cast out, and does not contribute to the karyo- kinetic figure, but a part at least of its substance probably furnishes ' the plastin ground-substance of the chromosomes. At this phase, when the achromatinic spindle is fully formed, with the plate of chromosomes at its equator, the actual partition of the chromatin between the two future daughter-nuclei usually begins, 104 THE PROTOZOA though in some cases it is accomplished at an earlier stage ; it takes place in one of two ways, known respectively as equating and re- ducing division. In equating division each chromosome divides into two daughter-chromosomes, a process which, in the finished and perfect karyokinesis of the higher organisms, is effected by a longi- tudinal splitting of the chromosome, and which may be interpreted as a simple division into two of each of the component chromidio- somes (compare Fig. 60). In reducing division, on the other hand, the individual chromosomes do not divide, but are sorted out, half of them going to one pole of the spindle, and eventually to one daughter-nucleus, the other half to the other ; with the result, finally, that each daughter-nucleus has half the number of chromo- somes possessed originally by the parent nucleus. Equating division is the usual type of karyokinesis seen in ordinary cell- multiplicatibn ; reducing division, on the other hand, is seen only in certain phases of the maturation of the germ-cells, as explained in the next chapter. In either type of division, whether equating or reducing, the equatorial plate of chromosomes as a whole divides into two daughter-plates, which separate from one another and travel towards the poles of the achromatinic spindle. As the daughter-plates move away from each other, an achromatinic framework appears between them, in which a longitudinal striation or fibrillation is seen in line with, and continuing that of, the achromatinic spindle. Hence the achromatinic spindle as a whole consists now of the older terminal portions passing from the poles to the daughter-plates, and a new median portion passing between the two daughter-plates ; the two terminal portions constitute together what may be termed conveni- ently the " attraction-spindle," the median portion the " separation- spindle." As the daughter-plates travel further apart, the separa- tion-spindle elongates more and more ; the attraction-spindle, on the other hand, becomes shorter, usually to such a degree that the daughter-plates are brought close up to the poles of the attraction- spindle, which consequently is obliterated and disappears. When full separation of the daughter-plates is attained, the separation- spindle breaks down and disappears gradually, the middle part alone persisting in some cases ; the chromatin of the daughter-plates becomes rearranged to form the daughter-nuclei, going through a scries of changes similar to those by which the chromosomes arose from the parent-nucleus, but in inverse order. A nuclear mem- brane is formed round each daughter-nucleus, and the process is complete. In the Metazoa, direct and karyokinetic division stand out as the sole types of nuclear division, in sharp contrast and without inter- mediate or transitional forms of the process. In Protozoa, on the THE REPRODUCTION OF THE PROTOZOA 105 contrary, every possible form of nuclear division is found, from the most simple and direct to karyokinesis as perfect as that seen in the Metazoa. The nuclear division-processes of Protozoa are there- fore exceedingly interesting as furnishing object-lessons in the gradual evolution of the mechanism of nuclear division ; but the extreme diversity in these processes makes it very difficult to deal with them in the Protozoa in a general and comprehensive manner in a short space and without excessive detail. Speaking generally, the indirect nuclear division seen in Protozoa differs from that of the higher organisms in a number of points which indicate that it stands on a lower grade of evolution. As regards the achromatinic elements, the nuclear membrane is usually persistent throughout the process of division, a circumstance which enables a sharp dis- tinction to be drawn between the portions of the division-mechanism derived from the nuclear framework and the cytoplasm respectively. In many cases it is then seen that the cytoplasm does not take any share in the process at all, but that the nucleus divides in a per- fectly autonomous manner, spindle and centrioles remaining intra- nuclear throughout the whole process. As regards the chromatin, the chromosomes when formed are often irregular in form, size, and number ; they often appear imperfectly separated from one another ; they are not always arranged in a definite equatorial plate, but may be scattered irregularly along the spindle ; and they do not always split in the exact manner characteristic of the nuclear divisions of the higher organisms, but divide irregularly and often transversely. The principal types of nuclear division in Protozoa will now be described with the aid of a few selected examples. We may begin with those in which the division of the nucleus is autonomous, without co-operation of cytoplasmic elements. Division has often been asserted to be direct in cases in which subsequent research has revealed a more elaborate type; never- theless, many typical cases of amitosis occur among Protozoa. In some nuclei of the vesicular type, the chromatin appears to be concentrated entirely in the karyosome, which may contain a centriole also, and when the nucleus divides the karyosome becomes dumb-bell-shaped, and is finally constricted into two halves, the entire nucleus following suit ; as an example of this, almost the simplest conceivable type of nuclear division, may be cited the nuclei of the Microsporidia and allied organisms (Fig. 173, p. 416). A type similar in the main to that just described, but slightly more advanced in structural complication, is exemplified by the division of the nucleus in the schizogony of Coccidium (Fig. 51, F — M ) ; here there is a peripheral zone of chromatin and a more distinct nuclear membrane. After division of the karyosome, the peripheral 106 THE PROTOZOA chromatin is halved irregularly ; no definite chromosomes are formed, but the grains of peripheral chromatin form clumps and masses of various shapes and sizes. A definite achromatinic spindle , \ #&\ / i\ •« with masses of chromatin at each pole (0 and H) ; the two daughter-karyosomes, at first connefeted by a fila- ment or centrodesmose, travel apart, taking the polar clumps of chromatin with them (/) ; the centrodesmose breaks through and disappears, and the two daughter-nuclei travel apart, with formation of an intermediate body on the filament between them (J — L) ; finally the connecting filament breaks down and the daughter-nuclei separate (M). kl, 'Karyosome ; k2, k2, daughter- karyosomes ; t., intermediate body. After Schaudinn (99), magnified 2,250. FIG. 52. — Direct division of the nuclei in the oocyst of Coccidium schubergi. A, The resting nucleus ; B, 0, D, clumping together of the chromatin-granuies preparatory to division ; E, F-, 0, the nucleus elongates and becomes dumb- bell-bhapea; H, the nucleus hag just divided into two halves. After Schaudinn (99), magnified 2,250. also does not become differentiated. As the daughter-karyosomes, connected by a centrodesmose, travel apart, half the peripheral chromatin follows one karyosome, half the other. This method of THE REPRODUCTION OF THE PROTOZOA 107 division is a very common one in the nuclei of Protozoa, and may show a further advance towards a true mitosis in that the peri- pheral chromatin may shape itself into more or less definite chromosomes, as in Euglena. Examples of granular nuclei which divide in the direct method are seen in the division of the nucleus of the oocyst of Coccidium (Fig. 52) to form the nuclei of the sporoblasts (see p. 349, infra) and in the corresponding divisions of the nuclei of haemogregarines (Fig. 53). In these two cases the presence of a centriole in the nucleus is douotful, but is affirmed by Hartmann and Chagas (89) for haemo- gregarines ; a true nuclear membrane, FIG. 53. — Direct division of the nucleus in the zygote of Hcemogregarina stepanowi. $ , Degenerating male elements attached to the zygote ; N., divid- ing nucleus of the zygote, two successive stages (A and B). After Reichenow (78). ev'- however, appears to be absent, and this form of division is not much advanced beyond the condition of chromidial frag- mentation. In the macronucleus of Infusoria (Fig. 54), in which a distinct membrane is present, the division is also direct, and centrioles are stated to be absent as a general rule ; in some cases, however, true centrioles appear to be present (Nagler). When centrioles are absent, the achromatinic framework of the nucleus appears to be principally active in the division. In some cases the division of the macronucleus of Infusoria is not into two equal halves, but may take the form of budding off a smaller daughter-nucleus from the main mass. Remark- able instances «>i nuclear budding of this kind are seen in the Acinetaria, where it is related to the formation of buds by the parent individual. In some cases (Fig. 55), the nucleus may form a con- FIG. 54,, — Paramecium cauda- tum : division showing the macronucleus (N) dividing without mitosis, the micro- nucleus (n) dividing mito- tically. C.W.1 Old, and c.v.2, new, contractile vacuoles. After Biitschli and Sohe- wiakoff, in Leuckart and Nitsche's Zoologische Wand- tafdn, No. Ixv. 108 THE PROTOZOA siderable number of buds simultaneously, each of which becomes the nucleus of a daughter-individual budded off from the parent. The simplest types of mitosis show but little advance on the processes of direct division that have just been described. Taking first the vesicular type of nucleus with a large karyosome (" proto- karyon "), the first stage in the process is the division of the karyo- some, as in Coccidium ; its centriole divides first, then the karyo- some becomes constricted and divides, the two halves often plainly connected by the centrodesmose formed by the division of the cen- trioles. Next an achromatinic spindle is formed between the two daughter-karyosomes, and chromosomes make their appearance, derived partly (perhaps in some cases entirely) from the peripheral zone of chromatin, partly from the chromathi contained in the karyosome. A good example of this mode of division has been described by Aragao (87) in an amoeba named by him A. diplomitotica from the fact that two types of mitosis occur in this species. In the first type (Fig. 56, A—G), the little rod -like chromo- somes are not arranged in a definite equatorial plate, but are scattered -Ml FIG. 55. — Budding in Podophrya gemmipara. The macronucleus of the parent has sent off a number of outgrowths, which extend into the buds and give rise to the nuclei of the daughter-individuals about to be budded off. N*. "Parent-nucleus ; irregularly along the N2, nuclei of buds. After Hertwig. spindle ; some travel to- wards one pole, some towards the other, and, after separation into two groups in this manner, the chromosomes of each group fuse together to form an apparently solid mass of chromatin, representing the daughter- plates ; these masses of chromatin follow each their respective karyosonies as they travel apart, and when the nucleus is finally constricted into two daughter-nuclei, the chromatin- masses break up again into their constituent chromosomes, which become dis- tributed in the peripheral zone and karyosome of the daughter- nuclei, where they can be distinguished plainly even during the resting state (Fig. 56, A). In the second type of mitosis seen in A. diplomitotica (Fig. 56, H — K), the chromosomes arrange themselves in a definite equatorial 109 plate, which divides into two equally definite daughter-plates com- posed of distinct chromosomes ; whether this division is brought about by splitting of the individual chromosomes is not clear. When the nucleus is finally constricted into the two daughter- nuclei, the chromosomes are at first aggregated close beside their respective karyosomes, but soon distribute themselves in the manner already described. The simple types of mitosis described in the two foregoing para- graphs are examples of the so-called " promitosis " (Nagler, 95) FIG. 50. — The two methods of nuclear division in Amoeba diplomitotica. A, Resting nucleus ; B — G, first method ; // — K, second method. In F and G only one of the two halves of the nuclear figure is drawn. After Aragao (87). seen commonly in nuclei of the protokaryon-type. The nuclear membrane in this type is a negligible quantity ; it may be scarcely or not at all developed in the resting nucleus, and when a distinct membrane is present it may vanish entirely during the mitosis, as in the form just described. In any case, however, the entire mitosis goes on within the nuclear space. The chromosomes may show every possible condition in different cases, from complete irregu- larity in form, number, arrangement, and mode of division, to the 110 THE PROTOZOA formation of a definite equatorial plate which splits into two daughter-plates. The most striking and salient feature of this type of mitosis is furnished by the relatively huge " polar masses," con- sisting of the daughter-karyosomes with their contained centrioles. In the division of the nucleus of Arcella (Fig. 57), however, the karyosome first breaks up into fine grams of chromatin, from which the polar masses and the equatorial plate are formed. The karyo- some, as has been pointed out in the previous chapter, consists of three distinct elements — namely, plastin, chromatin, and centriole FIG. 57. — Nuclear division in Arietta, vulgaris: karyo kinesis of one' of the two principal nuclei. A, Spireme-stage, resulting from disruption of, the karyosome ; B — D, formation of an equatorial plate of minute chromosomes (?) which split ; E, anaphase i F, the two daughter-nuclei shortly after division. After Swarczewsky (101), magnified 2,250. —each independent of, and separable from, the others. In proportion as the karyosome loses its plastin and chromatin elements, and becomes reduced to the centriole alone, so the primitive promitosis will approach more and more to the type of an ordinary mitosis. Such a reduction of the karyo- some could take place during the mitosis if, as happens frequently, the whole of the chromatin F contained in the karyosome passed out to join the peripheral chromatin in forming the chromosomes, the plastin-substance at the same time furnishing the required ground-substance of the chromosomes (Fig. 58). On the other hand, the karyosome may disappear from the- resting nucleus also ; Chatton (49) has brought together a number of instances of nuclei showing a gradual reduction of the karyosome in different species, and the evolution of a granular type of nucleus in which the chromatin is scattered through the achromatinic framework, leaving the centriole free or but slightly encumbered by other elements in the nuclear cavity. When a nucleus of this type divides by mitosis, a most typical and perfect karyokinetic THE REPRODUCTION OF THE PROTOZOA 111 figure may be produced, as in Euglypha (Figs. 59, 60), only differing from that of Metazoa in that the whole mitosis takes place within the nuclear membrane, and consequently without any co-operation of cytoplasmic elements. Chatton proposes for a mitosis of this type- the term " mesomitosis," as distinguished from the more ad- vanced type, or " metamitosis," in which a collaboration of cyto- plasmic and nuclear elements is effected, and the entire karyokinetic Fio. 58. — Division of Hcematococcus pluvial^ A , Resting condition, the nucleus with a conspicuous karyosome and fine grains of chromatin in an achromatinic reti- culum ; B, C, preparations for nuclear division, the chromatin passing from the karyosome into the nuclear reticulum ; D, further stage, the karyosome in disruption and chromosomes beginning to bo formed ; E, nuclear spindle ; F, division of the nucleus complete, the karyosomes reconstituted in the daughter-nuclei, the cell-body beginning to divide ; 0, division of the cell, the daughter-nuclei of the normal resting type. After Eeichenow (97-5). figure lies free in the cytoplasm after disappearance of the nuclear membrane. Before passing on, however, to this more advanced type, account must be taken of the more simple types of mitosis seen in granular nuclei. Instructive examples of the division of nuclei, in which the chromatin is not concentrated into a karyosome, but distributed evenly throughout the achromatinic framework, are seen in the nuclei 112 THE PROTOZOA FIG. 59. — Division of Euglypha alveolate, as seen in the living animal. A, Condition of the animal when about to divide. The protoplasmic body shows three zones : (1) At the fundus of the shell is clear proto- plasm containing the nucleus (N.) and the reserve shell- plates (s.p.) ; (2) the middle region is occupied by granular protoplasm containing ingested food-materials (/.) and the contractile vacuole (c.v.) ; (3) near the mouth of the shell is a zone of hyaline protoplasm from which the pseudopodia (ps.) are given off. B, Early stage of division, about twenty minutes later than A. The proto- plasm is streaming out of the shell-mouth to form the body of a daughter- individual, into which the reserve shell-plates are passing and arranging them- selves at its surface to form a daughter-shell. In the nucleus chromosomes are beginning to be formed. G, About twenty-five minutes later than B. The body of the daughter and its shell are further advanced in formation ; in the nucleus of the parent the equatorial plate is forming, and the two centrosomes are becoming visible on the two flattened sides of the nucleus (the centrosomes are probably derived from the division of the karyosome, no longer visible in the nucleus at this stage, or from a centriole contained in the karyosome). [Continued at foot of p. 113.] THE REPRODUCTION OF THE PROTOZOA 113 FIG. 60. — Details of the structural changes of the nucleus of Euglypha alveolata during karyokinesis, showing the formation of the chromosomes. A, Coarsely - meshed condition of the nucleus ; the chromatin-granules aggregated at the nodes of the reticulum. B, Later stage ; the nucleus beginning to show a fibrous structure as a result of the irregular clumps of chromatin-granules of the previous stage becoming arranged in linear series. B2, Some of the fibrils of this stage more highly magnified. G, Later stage ; the fibrils have become smoother and more parallel in arrangement. C2, Fibrils more highly magnified ; they consist, as in the last stage of darker and lighter parts (the former chro matin, the latter probably plastin) ; between the individual fibrils are cross-connections, more regular in this stage than in the last (remains of the nuclear reticulum). D, The fibrils have become shorter and thicker, and are bending up to form the U-shaped chromosomes. After SchewiakoiT (100) ; magnification of A, B, 0, and D, about 1,200 diameters. of ciliate Infusoria, such as Paramecium. The macronucleus divides without mitosis, as stated already, but the'micronucleus exhibits a primitive type of mitosis (Fig. 61). When division begins, the FIG. 59 — continued: D, About fifteen minutes later than G. The daughter-shell is now com- pletely formed, and the middle granular zone of the parent is passing over into it ; the nucleus of the parent has assumed its definitive orientation, with the centrosomes at the poles of an axis coincident with the longitudinal axis of the animal, and the equatorial plate is definitely formed. E, About thirty minutes later than D. The whole of the middle zone of the parent has passed over into the daughter-shell ; the flattened form of the nucleus is changing into an elongated spindle-form, and the equatorial plate is splitting to form the two daughter-plates. F, About five minutes later than E. The daughter-plates have travelled apart, and the division of the nucleus is beginning. 0, About five minutes later than F. The division of the nucleus is com- plete, and one daughter-nucleus has passed OV«M Into the body of the daughter- Eiiglypha. H, About twenty-five minutes later than G (about 125 minutes from the beginning). Some of the protoplasm of the middle zone flows back into the parent-shell, and each individual has its own contractile vacuole ; the two daughter-nuclei are reconstituted, and the karyosome has reappeared in each ; pseudopodia are being protruded from the mouths of the shells ; the division is complete, and the animals are beginning to separate. After Schowiakoff (100) ; magnification about 470 diameters. 114 THE PROTOZOA amount of chromatin increases, and the nucleus becomes oval in form. The chromatin forms a number of chromosomes shaped like elongated rods or short threads, which arrange themselves at the equator. At the same time the achromatinic framework shows a longitudinal fibrillation or striation, the apparent fibrillse being centred in thickenings of the achromatinic framework which appear at the two poles of the nucleus within the persistent nuclear mem- brane, hence termed the " polar plates." Centrosomic grains are stated to be entirely absent, and their functions are performed by the polar plates. The nucleus continues to elongate, and the chromosomes divide transversely to their long axis to form the daughter-plates, which travel apart ; as they do so the fibrillated FIG. 61. — Stages in the division of the micronucleus of Para- mecium. A, B, Early stages ; G, spindle-stage with equa- torial plate of chromosomes ; D, spindle with the two daughter-plates; E — H, growth of the separation-spindle and separation of the two daughter-plates ; /, reconstitu- tion of the daughter-nuclei, which are widely separated, but still connected by the greatiy elongated separation- M spindle, the central part of which shows a dilatation prior to its final absorption. After Hertwig. Figs A — E are drawn on a larger scale than the other figures. separation-spindle appears between them. The nucleus as a whole now becomes dumb-bell-shaped ; the daughter-plates are lodged in the terminal swellings, while the rapidly-growing separation-spindle occupies the handle of the dumb-bell. The daughter-plates now break up and reconstitute the daughter-nuclei, but the connecting portion continues to elongate and to push the daughter-nuclei apart. It is clear that the separation is effected by intrinsic growth of the achromatinic framework constituting the separation-spindle, which is often curved up into a horseshoe-figure, and shows bending or twisting of its fibrils, as the result of the inert resistance of the sur- rounding cytoplasm. Finally, however, a limit of growth is attained ; the daughter-nuclei become constricted off completely from the connecting bond, which is absorbed and disappears. The nuclear membrane persists throughout the division. In all the forms of nuclear division dealt with so far, nuclear elements alone have been active in the process. A most instructive series, showing how extranuclear elements come to collaborate in THE REPRODUCTION OF THE PROTOZOA 115 the mechanism of division, is furnished by some examples of the Heliozoa, and especially by the nuclear divisions of Actinosphcerium, which have been the subject of extraordinarily thorough investiga- tion by Hertwig (64). In this form there are three different modes of karyokinesis, which, however, for present purposes may be classified under two heads : karyokinesis without and with centro- somes. In the ordinary nuclear division during the vegetative life •of the organism, and also in the divisions by which the primary FIG. 62. — Actinosphcerium eichhorni : stages of the ordinary, vegetative nuclear division, without centrosomes, of free-living individuals (not encysted). A, B, Formation of the chromosomes within the nucleus, and of the proto- plasmic polar cones outside the nucleus ; G, spindle-stage with polar cones (p.c.), polar plates (p.p.), and equatorial plate of chromosomes (e.r.); D, stage with daughter - plates of chromosomes which have travelled towards the polar plates ; E — Q, division of the nucleus, reconstitution of the daughter-nuclei, and disappearance of the polar cones. After Hertwig (64). cysts divide into the secondary cysts (p. 138), centrosomes are absent, but they are present in the two divisions which produce the two reduction - nuclei thrown off from each secondary cyst. In the ordinary karyokinesis of Actinosphazrium (Fig. 62) an equatorial plate is formed composed of a large number of small, rod-like chromosomes, imperfectly separated from one another, which divide transversely. The spindle arises from the achromatinic framework of the nucleus, and terminates in two conspicuous polar •F$$HfS\$'« >x %fi3Sli •£&$••• Spffifit 11^ •*,/ -,4i\;>/V •:• - i- :» s ^a\>o;>!,vi;;/v » \.Vw/:i;-v>-^ '•-' 1 ; $?< ^112^ *W$ffi. FIG. 63. — Actinosphcenum eichhorni: first reduction-division, with ccntrosomes (the stages here shown follow those of the centrosome-forrnation in Fig. 37). A, Centrosome with radiations in a mass of archoplasm at one pole of the nucleus ; B, two centrosomes and arclioplasniic cones, taking up positions on opposite sides of the nucleus, in which chromosomes are beginning to appear ; G, D, formation of the nuclear spindle and equatorial plate of chromosomes ; E, division of the equatorial plate ; F, division of the nucleus beginning ; G, H, division of the nucleus and rcconstitution of the daughter-nuclei ; one daughter-nucleus will degenerate and be rejected as a reduction -nucleus ; the beginning of this is seen in //, where* the upper darker daughter- nucleW is the one which degenerates. After Hcrtwig (64). THE REPRODUCTION OF THE PROTOZOA 117 plates lying within the persistent membrane. External to the membrane are two large conical masses of archoplasm, termed the " polar cones." As in the micronucleus of Paramecium, the polar plates represent functionally the centrosomes, towards which the daughter- plates travel, and division of the nucleus is effected by growth of the separation-spindle. The archoplasmic polar cones appear to take little or no part in the mechanics of the division, since their apices maintain their distance from one another, and the growth of the separation-spindle pushes the daughter-nuclei into their substance. The reduction-karyokinesis is heralded by the formation of a centrosome from the nucleus (Fig. 37 ; see p. 80, supra). The centrosomes are at first close to the nucleus, external to its mem- brane, but when the karyokinetic spindle is formed the centro- somes travel to the apices of the cones. From the centrosomes radiations extend through the polar cones, continuing the direction of the longitudinal striations of the intranuclear spindle, though separated from them by the intervening nuclear membrane. During the division the apices of the cones move apart to a slight extent, but the separation of the daughter-nuclei is still mainly the work of the separation-spindle, which pushes them into the polar cones and brings them close to the two centrosomes again ; hence the activity of the polar archeplasm can be but slight. The chromo- somes in the reduction-divisions are more distinctly separated from each other as the result, apparently, of a reduction in the amount of the pi as tin forming the ground-substance. The nuclear membrane persists throughout the whole process. In Actinophrys the karyokinesis appears to be of a type similar to that of Actinosphcerium, with persistent membrane, but with more activity in the extranuclear archoplasmic elements. In Acanthocystis (Fig. 64), however, the nuclear membrane disappears completely from the karyokinetic figure, and it is no longer possible, in consequence, to distinguish the parts of the achromatinic spindle which are of intranuclear and extranuclear origin respectively. Nuclear and cytoplasmic elements are in complete co-operation, a condition of things which has apparently been brought about and rendered possible by the extrusion of the centrosome from the nucleus in the first instance. From the foregoing examples, it is seen that amongst the Protozoa the material is to be found for illustrating the gradual evolution of the mechanism of karyokinetic division, from the starting-point of simple and direct division up to tho most advanced type in which a perfect karyokinetic figure is formed by co-operation of nuclear and cytoplasmic substance. It is not necessary to suppose, how- ever, that the course of evolution has always been in the direction 118 THE PROTOZOA of that type of mitosis found in the cells of Metazoa ; it would be more reasonable to expect that in some cases at least other distinct types 'of division- mechanisms would have been evolved — side- \ w&y^. ssvv T>»**wt\T B ^W^fa^ •^i^=»£ \^t)V ••••m^-r.*«?BSSr "rfi^^ • FIG. 64. — Division of Acanthocystis acvleata. A, Besting state of the animal. N., Nucleus ; c., central grain ; a./., axial filaments of the pseudopodia, pa. ; sp., spioules. B, Pseudopodia withdrawn ; nucleus in the spircme -stage ; central grain dividing. C, Division of the central grain further advanced ; nucleus showing distinct chromosomes. D, Central grain completely divided into centrosomes, between which the nucleus is placed ; in the nucleus the membrane is becoming dissolved, the rcticulum is becoming modified in arrangement to form the achromatin;c spindlo (or a part of it), and the chromo- somes are taking up their position in the equatorial plate. E, Complete nuclear spindle, with centrosomes, achromatinic spindle, and equatorial plate. F, Later stage with daughter-plates and division of the cell-body beginning. O, Division of the nucleus and of the cell-body nearly complete. After Schaudinn (82). THE REPRODUCTION OF THE PROTOZOA 119 branches, as it were, of the stem which culminates in the Metazoan type. An, example of this is seen in the peculiar karyokinesis of Noctiluca (Fig. 65), in which the division is directed by a large " sphere," consisting of a mass of archoplasm containing the cen- trioles. The sphere divides and forms the axis of the karyokinetic figure, of whidh the nuclear portion is placed asymmetrically to one side. In considering this remarkable process of evolution, consisting in the gradual elaboration of a highly complicated mechanism for division of the nucleus, the question naturally arises, What is the object of a process so elaborate ? Or, if this method of posing the problem offends as being too teleological, we may alter the phrase- ology, and inquire, What is the result of the process ? The answer is perfectly obvious. The result effected by equating karyokinesis FIG. 65. — Stages in the nuclear division of Noctiluca miliaris. A, Early stage, the "sphere" (sph.) beginning to divide, the- nucleus wrapping round it; B, later stage, the sphere nearly divided, the two poles of the nuclear spindle in section attached to the two daughter-spheres ; 0, section across B; the sphere contains a centriole (c.), to which the chromosomes (chr.) are attached by achromatic fibrils. After Calkins (48). in its most perfected forms is an exact halving, both quantitative and qualitative, of the chromatin-substance of the nucleus — quanti- tative, by division of each chromatin-granule or chromidiosome, and the partition of the division-products equally between the two daughter-cells ; qualitative also, if we suppose that different chro- midiosomes may have different properties, and exert their own peculiar influence on the life and activities of the cell ; then, since each daughter-cell contains finally the sister-chromidiosomes of those contained in the sister-cell, the qualities of its chromatin are the exact counterpart of those of the sister-cell and also of the original parent-cell. Hence karyokinesis may be regarded as insuring the transmission to the daughter-cells of the distinctive properties of the parent-cell, unimpaired and unaltered. The whole process indi- cates clearly the immense importance of the chromatin-substance 120 THE PROTOZOA in the life of the cell. It is probable, also, that the elaboration of the process of karyokinetic division in Protista was an indispensable antecedent to the evolution of multicellular organisms, since for the formation of a tissue it is necessary that all the cells which build it up should be perfectly similar in their constitution and properties, and this condition could only be brought about, prob- ably, by karyokinetic division of the nuclei in the process of cell- multiplication. In the foregoing paragraphs we have dealt only with simple (binary) nuclear division, but, as already stated, in some cases the nucleus divides by multiple fission into a number of daughter- nuclei simultaneously. A simple instance of direct multiple division of a nucleus, in which, apparently, no centrioles are present, has been described by Lebedew (93) in the nuclei of Trachelocerca (Fig. 66 ; see also p. 448). In this form partitions are formed within the nucleus between the grains and masses of chromatin, and finally the nucleus becomes segmented into a mulberry-like mass of daughter - nuclei, which separate from one another. In most cases, prob- ably, of multiple fission the nucleus contains a centriole, FIG. 66. — Four stages of direct multiple fission in , , , ,,. , ~ the nuclei of Trachelocerca jthoenicopterus. After MOtnei Lebedew (93). is brought about in a manner analogous to the formation of a plasmodium by multiplication of the nucleus in a cell which remains undivided — that is to say, the centriole multiplies by fission a number of times without the nucleus as a whole becoming divided. Thus, in a nucleus of the simple protokaryon type, containing at first a single karyosome and cen- triole, division of these structures may take place within the mem- brane without the nucleus as a whole dividing, so that the nucleus contains finally two or more karyosomes, each containing a cen- triole. The karyosomes are ultimately set free from the nucleus, either by being budded off singly from it, or by the nucleus as a whole breaking up ; then each karyosome becomes the foundation of a new nucleus. Division of this type, which may be termed a multiple promitosis, has been described by Zuelzer (86) in Wag- nerella. In cases where the division of the nucleus is of the karyo- kinetic type, repeated divisions of the centriole result in the forma- tion of a complicated multipolar mitotic figure, leading to a multiple division of the nucleus, as seen in the divisions of the nuclei in the male sporont of Aggregata (Fig. 67), as described by Moroff (94). THE REPRODUCTION OF THE PROTOZOA 121 The presence of more than one centriole in a nucleus has led Hartmann (60) to formulate the theory that such nuclei are to be regarded as " polyenergid " nuclei.* Hartmann proposes to dis- tinguish a nucleus with a single centriole as a " monokaryon " from a polyenergid nucleus or " polykaryon " containing many cen- trioles ; he interprets many cases, in which a nucleus appears to become resolved into chromidia from which secondary nuclei are formed, as being really a setting free of monokarya from a complex polykaryon — an interpretation which certainly gets over the diffi- culty of the formation of centrioles in second- ary nuclei (see further, p. 255, -infra). In conclusion, men- tion must be made of the theory of cell-divi- sion and of the causes which bring it about, put forward by Hertwig (91, 92). This theory is based on the sup- position, of which men- tion was made in the previous chapter (p. 70, gupra) — that for the normal performance of FIG. 67. — Multiple nuclear division in the male vital functions a cer- sporont of Aggreguta, jacquemeti. The nucleus, of which the outline has become irregular but is still tain quantitative re- visible, is surrounded by eight centrioles, from lation must be main- each of which striations pass towards and into the nucleus. After Moroff (94), magnified 750 tamed between the iinear. nuclear substance and the cytoplasm. As a standard for the proportion of nuclear mass and cytoplasm (" Kernplasma-Norm "), the individual im- mediately after fission may be taken. Exact measurements made on Infusoria show that, while the body grows continuously in size from one division to the next, the nucleus at first diminishes slightly * The conception of " energids " is due to Sachs, who coined the term to denote " a single cell-nucleus with the protoplasm governed by it, so that a nucleus and the protoplasm surrounding it are to be conceived of as a whole, arid this whole is an organic unity, both in the morphological and the physiological sense." Heitwig (6G) has criticized this conception, ami has shown its untenability in the case of Protozoa, which behave as single individuals whether they possess one nucleus or many. Hartmann, considering the centriole as the criterion of in- dividuality rather than the nucleiis, has revived the energid theory in the manner described above. It leads him to regard an ordinary Metazoan karyokinesis as the division of a polykaryon, in which each separate chromosome represents a distinct nuclear element or monokaryou — a conclusion which appears to lead rather to a reductio ad absurdum of the theory. 122 THE PROTOZOA in size, and then grows slowly until the next division-period is reached. As a result of the slow " functional growth " of the nucleus, a disproportion between the mass of the nuclear substance and that of the cytoplasm is brought about, producing a condition of tension between the nucleus and the cytoplasm (" Kernplasma- Spannung "). When the tension reaches a maximum, the nucleus acquires the power of growing rapidly at the expense of the cyto- plasm, and this " division-growth " leads to the fission of the cell, restoring the standard balance of nucleus and cytoplasm. Relative increase of the nuclear substance retards the cell-division, and brings about increase in the size of the cell ; relative decrease of the nuclear mass has the opposite effect. 2. Division of the Cell. — A distinction has been drawn above between binary fission, or division of the body into two, and mul- tiple fission into many parts simultaneously. The daughter-indi- viduals produced in^ either case may be similar to the parent-indi- vidual in all respects except size, or may differ from it in lacking more or fewer of its characteristic parts and organs, which are then formed after the daughter-individuals are set free. In extreme cases one or more of the daughter-individuals may possess, when first liberated, no structure more elaborated than the essential parts of a cell, cytoplasm and nucleus or chromidia ; in such cases the daughter is termed a " bud," and the process of fission by which it arises is termed " budding " or gemmation, distinguished further as " simple gemmation " when only one bud is formed at a time, and " multiple gemmation " when many arise simultaneously. In many cases of multiple gemmation the parent- organism does not survive the process, but breaks up almost completely into buds, leaving only a greater or less amount of residual protoplasm, which degene- ates and dies off ; budding of this kind is termed sporulation. In binary fission, when the organism is of simple structure, as in the case of amoebae, the division is equally simple. After division of the nucleus, the two daughter-nuclei travel apart, and the body follows suit, by flowing, as it were, in two opposite directions, forming two smaller individuals each with a nucleus, and con- nected at first by a protoplasmic bridge, which soon snaps and is drawn in. The contractile vacuole, if present, is taken over by one of the two daughter-individuals, while the other forms a new vacuole ; in many cases the normal number of contractile vacuoles is doubled before division begins. In forms of more complicated structure, the division also becomes a more complex process. Where the body-form is definite, the plane of cleavage bears usually a constant relation to it. Thus, in Ciliata the division of the body takes place typically transversely to its longitudinal axis, except in the order Peritricha. In Flagel- — >[, j . e ; " .;,• .v.-;:-^ ?.•• :$pr«£i:V-!f& .••.-.• ••:.'•• "ji ^iimiimM^ ^$?&®Z0i%gC T^&;;®&*n cdi. A, The amoeba at the beginning of ency station with a single nucleus ; B, the nucleus dividing ; G, the two daughter-nuclei throwing off chromidia ; a space has appeared be- tween them ; D, each nucleus has formed two re- duction-nuclei, which are being absorbed ; ]8, a resistant cyst-membrane has been secreted ; the partial division in the protoplasm has disappeared, and the two reduced nuclei are each dividing into two ; F, each daughter-nucleus of the two divisions in the last stage has fused with one of the daughter- nuclei of the other division to form two synkarya. After Hartmann (116), drawn by him from the de- scription given by Schaudinn (131). SYNGAMY AND SEX IN THE PROTOZOA 139 In Entamceba coli (Fig. 73) the process starts in like manner from a uninucleate individual, the nucleus of which divides into two, but the cell divides incompletely and 'only temporarily. Each nucleus then breaks up completely into chromidia and disappears from view. Some of the chromidia are absorbed, while from others a secondary nucleus is formed on each side of the cell, so that two nuclei reappear again in the cyst, but smaller than before and staining feebly. Each secondary nucleus now divides twice to form three nuclei on each side, two of which degenerate as re- duction-nuclei, while the third in each caso persists as a gamete- nucleus. As soon as the process of reduction is complete, the incomplete separation of the two cells disappears, so that the two gamete-nuclei lie in a single cell, which at this stage forms a tough cyst. Now each gamete-nucleus divides into two pronuclei, those of the same pair being slightly different from those of the other, according to Schaudinn (133). Then a pronucleus of each pair fuses with a pronucleus of the other pair, so that two synkarya result. At a later stage each synkaryon divides twice, and eight amcebulae are formed by division of the cell within the cyst. From these two examples, it is seen that autogamy is a process of extreme inbreeding as regards the gametes. In typical cases of syngamy the two gametes must be derived from two distinct strains, and those of the same strain will not conjugate ; Schaudinn (131), for example, observed that the gametes of Polystometta crispa would only copulate when a couple came together in which each gamete was of distinct parentage. In a great number of Protozoa the differentiation of the gametes and their mode of formation makes it certain that the couple which join in syngamy are derived from different parents. On the other hand, in many cases of autogamy that have been described, it is equally certain that the conjugating gametes and pronuclei have a common parentage, and it is hardly possible to consider autogamy otherwise than as a degeneration of the sexual process, evolved in forms in which one feature of true syngamy — namely, the mixture of distinct strains — is, for some reason, no longer a necessity ; we shall return to this point when discussing the nature and origin of the syngamic process. It is possible, moreover, to recognize progressive stages of the degeneration, as shown by -the two examples selected. In the less advanced stage (Actinosph cerium) the parent cell divides into two complete cells, each of which, after a process of matura- tion, becomes a gamete. In the more advanced stage (Entamasba coli), the division of the parent-cell is checked, and only its nucleus divides, each daughter-nucleus becoming a pronucleus after reduction. The occurrence of autogamy has been asserted in a number of cases which are, to say the least, extremely doubtful, as for example, the Myxosporidia 140 THE PROTOZOA (p. 407) and allied organisms, where it iff far from certain that the two nuclei or cells, from which ultimately the pronuclei or gametes arise, have a common parentage. Autogamy has recently become very fashionable, and there is a tendency to regard as such, not only many cases which are probably truly heterogamous, but also nuclear fusions or appositions which are not in any way sexual (e.g., Schilling, 134). The essential point to consider, in cases of autogamy, .; whether there is a union of chromatin derived from distinct strains — amphimixis — or from a common parentage — automixis. Thus, it has been pointed out above that in gregarines two gametocytes may associate, and even fuse into .-one body, but with the nuclei remaining distinct (Fig. 71, B). When gamete-formation takes place in a " neogamous " species of this type, the gametes of one sex derive their pronuclei from one gametocyte-nucleus, those of the opposite sex from the other, with subsequent syngamy, 6f a truly heterogamous type. If the fusion of the gametocytes were to go farther, a plastogamic, non-sexual union of the two nuclei might result, producing a single nucleus containing , chromatin from two distinct sources ; in that case, when gamete-formation took place, the syngamy would be, to all intents and purposes, a typical case of autogamy, and would certainly be so described if it were not known that the single gametocyte-nucleus had arisen by fusion of two distinct nuclei. If, however, in each couple of copulating gametes, one pronucleus contained chromatin derived from one of the two original gametocyte-nuclei, the other pronucleus, similarly, chromatin derived from the other nucleus, the result would be a true amphimixis, just as in ordinary heterogamy. In Actinosphcerium, plastogamic fusions of the ordinary vegetative, multi- nucleate individuals are stated to be of common occurrence ; it is therefore possible that an individual which encysts may contain frequently nuclei from distinct sources. According to Brauer, fusion of nuclei takes place in the mother- cyst to form the nuclei of the primary cyst. There is therefore at least a possibility that the autogamy of Actinosphoerium may be, in some cases, combined with amphimixis. In other cases, however, such as Entomceba coli arid Amoeba albida (Fig. 87), there seems little reason to doubt that the autogamy is a true automixis. Analogous cases of self-fertilization are well known in flowering plants, where they are sometimes the rule, sometimes an alternative to cross-fertilization. In free-living Ciliata, also, syngamy has been observed between cousins, the descendants of an ex-conjugant after but four divisions (Jennings, 121), which is not far removed from automictic autogamy. The conclusion put forward above, on experimental grounds, that syngamy has a strengthening or invigorating effect on the cell-organism, receives further support from the many instances in which it is observed to occur as a preliminary to the production of resistant stages destined to endure unfavourable conditions of life. Thus, in free-living Protozoa syngamy occurs commonly in the autumn, previously to the assumption of a resting condition in which the organisms pass through the winter. In Difflugia, for instance, syngamy in the autumn is followed by encystment, and the cysts remain dormant until the spring. This is strictly comparable to the state of things known in many Metazoa, such as Rotifers, Daphnids, etc., where in the summer soft-shelled eggs are produced which develop parthenogenetically, but in the autumn hard-shelled winter-eggs are produced which require fertilization. In parasitic forms, such as Coccidia and Gregarines, syngamy is related to the formation of resistant cysts which pass out of the host SYNGAMY AND SEX IN THE PROTOZOA 141 and endure the vicissitudes of the outer world, until taken up by a new host in which the parasite is set free from its cyst and starts upon a fresh cycle of growth or multiplication without syngamy, under the most favourable conditions of nutrition. 2. As regards the effects of syngamy upon the species, it must be pointed out, in the first place, that a great difference exists between multicellular and unicellular organisms as regards the effects of external conditions of life upon the sexual process. In Metazoa the germ-cells, as already pointed out, are a race of cells apart, and are sheltered by their position in the body from the direct effects of external conditions — at least, to a very large extent. In Protozoa, on the other hand, there is no special race or strain of germ-cells, but any individual may become a gamete or the progenitor of gametes, and all alike are exposed to the direct action of the environment. If, now, Protist organisms placed under slightly different conditions of existence, tend to vary hi their characters as a direct consequence of environmental influences, syngamy would check any such tendency, and would, on the con- trary, tend to keep a given species constant and uniform in char- acter, within narrow limits. Were there no intermingling of distinct strains, such as syngamy brings about, individuals of a species subject to different conditions of life would tend to give rise to divergent strains and races ; syngamy levels up such diver- gencies and keeps the tendency to variation within the specific limits (compare Enriques, 112 and 113 ; Pearl, 124). If this sup- position be correct, it would follow that no true species could exist until syngamy had been evolved ; and if it be true that no syngamy occurs in organisms of the bacterial type of organization, then such organisms must be regarded as having diverged under direct environmental influences into distinct races and strains, but not as constituting true species. The " species " of bacteria would then be comparable to the races of the domestic dog, rather than to the natural species of the genus Canis. Not until syngamy was acquired could true species exist amongst the Protista, a condition which was probably first attained after the cellular grade of organization had been evolved. The conclusions reached in the foregoing paragraphs may be summed up briefly as follows : Syngamy is a process of inter- mingling, in a single cell-individual, of chromatin derived from two distinct individuals, gametes, which may exhibit differentiation into " male " individuals, characterized by preponderance of kinetic activity, and " female," in which trophic activities are more pronounced. Syngamy is probably of universal occurrence in organisms of the cellular type of organization, and from them has been inherited by the higher plants and animals, but apparently 142 THE PROTOZOA it does not occur amongst organisms of the bacterial grade. Syn- gamy is related to the life-cycle as a whole, and not specially to cell-reproduction. In its effects on the cell-individual, syngamy appears to have an invigorating effect, renewing vital powers that have become effete and exhausted ; but in species that live in very favourable conditions of nutrition, etc., whether such conditions are due to artificial culture or to natural causes, such as parasitism, syngamy may be deferred for a very long time, and may even be completely in abeyance, or may degenerate into parthenogenesis or autogamy. In its relation to the race, syngamy tends to level down individual variations, and so produce true species amongst the Protista. Before proceeding to discuss the nature and probable origin of the syngamic process, it is necessary to take into account a process which appears to be a universal concomitant of syngamy — namely, the process of nuclear reduction in the gametes. In all cases of syngamy that have been carefully studied, it has been found that the gametes differ from the ordinary cell-individuals of the species in having undergone a process of so-called " maturation " which con- sists essentially in nuclear reduction — that is to say, in a diminution of the normal quantity of the chromatin by so-called "reducing " divisions of the nucleus. Hence the pronuclei which undergo syngamic fusion differ in their constitution from the nuclei of cells not destined for this process, and do not multiply, as a rule, under normal conditions so long as they remain single. In some cases among plants, however, the cells that have undergone nuclear reduction may multiply by fission and produce a multicellular organism (gametophyte) from which gametes ultimately arise ; in this way is brought about the well-known alternation of genera- tions of the ferns and flowering plants. Since, moreover, in Metazoa, ova that have undergone nuclear reduction can be stimulated artificially to start their development without fertilization, it is clear that the nuclear reduction does not in itself inhibit further development or cell-multiplication. True nuclear reduction in gametes must be distinguished clearly from the process of elimination of effete or vegetative chromatin which precedes the formation of the gametes or their nuclei, probably in every case. As has been stated above (p. 72), vegetative and generative chromatin may be combined in the same nucleus, or may occur, the one in the form of a nucleus, the other in the form of chromidia, or may constitute two distinct nuclei. When the two are combined in one nucleus, a necessary preliminary to gamete- formation is the purification of the generative chromatin of all effete vegetative material. When the vegetative chromatin is already separate from the generative, the latter alone takes a SYNGAMY AND SEX IN THE PROTOZOA 143 share in syngamic processes, and the vegetative chromatin, whether as chromidia or a nucleus, disappears from the life-history. Nuclear reduction, in the strict sense, concerns simply the nuclei composed of generative chromatin, and is a process which results in the reduction of the chromatin to half the specific quantity, a deficiency made up again to the full amount by the union of the two pronuclei to form the synkaryon. It is therefore a process which is seen in its most characteristic form in those cases where it is possible to gauge the amount of chromatin in the nucleus more or less accurately by the number of chromosomes formed during division. In the Metazoa, where each species is characterized by possessing a number of chromosomes which is generally constant (the so-called " somatic number "), the process of reduction appears to be ex- tremely uniform in its essential details throughout the whole series, from the Sponges and Ccelenterates up to man, and admits of a description in general terms. The gametocyte (oocyte or sperma- tocyte), when at the full term of its growth, has a large nucleus which then goes through two maturative divisions in rapid succes- sion. When the gametocyte-nucleus prepares for division, it appears with half the somatic number of chromosomes ; but each chromosome is in reality bivalent, and produced by the fusion or close adherence of two separate somatic chromosomes. In the first reduction- mitosis, the two adherent chromosomes in each case separate from one another and travel to opposite poles of the spindle ; hence this division is in reality a reducing, though it simulates in some of its features an equating, division. Im- mediately or very soon after the two chromosomes of each pair have separated, they split longitudinally in preparation for the next mitosis, which follows hard upon the first, and in which the two sister-chromosomes of each pair go to opposite poles of the spindle. Consequently the second reduction-division is in reality an equating mitosis, though on account of the precocious splitting of the chromo- somes it may simulate a reducing division. Thus, to sum up the process briefly, the number of chromosomes in the germ-cells is reduced to half the somatic number by two successive mitoses, the first a reducing, the second an equating division. In the male sex, the spermatocyte divides into four gamete-cells of equal size, the spermatids, each of which becomes a spermatozoon. In the female sex the oocyte-divisions are very unequal, producing the ovum, ripe for fertilization, and three minute sister-cells of the ovum which, as the so-called " polar bodies," are cast off and die away. By syngamy between a ripe ovum and a spermatozoon, each containing half the somatic number of chromosomes, the full somatic number is restored. H4 THE PROTOZOA In Protozoa the chromosomes are seldom so sharply defined as in Metazoa, and consequently it is difficult or impossible to deter- mine their number. Many cases in wnich a fixed number of chromosomes is alleged to occur, as in Trypanosoma noctuce (Schau- dinn, 132), cannot be accepted without question in the present state of our knowledge. On the other hand, in all groups of the Protozoa, where the sexual processes have been carefully studied, the union of the gamete-nuclei has been found to be preceded in a great many cases by two successive divisions of each nucleus, with one or the' other of the following results : either the successive formation of two reduction-nuclei,* which are cast out of the cell or absorbed without dividing further, while the third persists as the pronucleus of the gamete ; or the production of four nuclei, all of which, or only one of them, persist as pronuclei. These reducing divisions in Protozoa suggest forcibly a comparison with those of the Metazoa, and from this analogy it may be further inferred that in Protozoa also the chromatin of the conjugating pronuclei has undergone a reduction to half the specific quantity ; but it is seldom possible to confirm this inference by accurate enumeration of the chromosomes. In the case which has been the most care- fully studied of all others, that, namely, of Actinosphcerium, Hertwig (64) found the number of chromosomes in the first reduction- spindle to be between 120 and 150 ; in the second reduction-spindle the number was about the same, but the chromosomes were about half the size of those in the first reduction-spindle. Moreover, in both the reducing divisions of Actinosphcerium the chromosomes in the equatorial plate divide to form the daughter-plates, as in ordinary karyokinesis, whereas in the reducing divisions of Metazoa the individual chromosomes are not divided, but merely sorted out. Hence it would appear that in Actinosphcerium, and probably many other Protozoa, the reduction of the chromatin in the pronuclei is effected by more direct, though perhaps less exact, methods than in the highly-perfected process seen in the Metazoa. Nevertheless, a few cases are known among Protozoa in which the small number of chromosomes permits of their being accurately counted, and in which they are seen to be reduced to half the usual number in the maturation-divisions of the gametes. In Pelomyxa the first division reduces the chromosomes from eight to four ; the second division, however, is equating, and no further reduction takes place (p. 150). In some Infusoria it has been observed that * These reduction-nuclei are sometimes termed "polar bodies," by analogy with the maturative process of the Metazoan ovum, but the term is to be avoided iu this connection, as it places upon these divisions an interpretation which is at least highly doubtful ; the polar bodies of Metazoa are sister-cells of the ovum ; the reduction-bodies in Protozoa are simply nuclei which are extruded or absorbed. It is certainly not justifiable in fact, and probably no more so in theory, to regard their formation as abortive cell-division. SYNGAMY AND SEX IN THE PROTOZOA 145 the first division of the micronucleus is an equating division, the second reducing ; so in Opercida/ria (Enriques, 112), Chilodon (Enriques, 113), Carchesium (Popoff, 125), Didinium (Prandtl, 126), and Anoplopkrya (Fig. 74) ; in the last named the second division of the micronucleus reduces the chromosomes from six to three, and union of the pronuclei brings the number up to six again. In Carchesium the number of chromosomes is reduced from sixteen to eight. A similar reduction-process has been described by Mulsow (123) in gregarines (p. 335). Hence in these cases the pronuclei FIG. 74. — Behaviour of the micronucleus during successive stages of the con- jugation of Anoplophrya (CoUinia) hranchiarum. A, Micronuoleus of one conjugant preparing for division ; B, later stage, with six chromosomes dis- tinct ; 0, nuclear spindle, with an equatorial plate of six chromosomes ; D, diaster-stage, with six daughter-chromosomes at each pole of the spindle ; E, later stage, with the chromosomes at each pole fused into one mass ; F, 0, H, reconstruction of the daughter-nuclei ; the remains of the spindle between them disappears gradually ; /, the two micronuclei preparing for division ; appearance of six chromosomes in each (one nucleus is seen in profile, the other from one pole) ; J, diaster-stages, showing three chromo- somes at each pole of the spinclle (reducing division) ; K, later stage, the chromosomes fused into masses^of ohromatin ; L, four granddaughter-micro- •"nuclei ; M, one of them grows in size, the other three begin to degenerate ; N, division of the persistent micronucleus to form the two pronuclei ; O, two pronuclei and three degenerating micronuolei. After Collin (50), magnification about 2.000 diameters. have exactly half the amount of chromatin contained in the ordinary nuclei, just as in the Metazoa. Doflein (111) and Hartmann (116) consider that a process of reduction is absolutely essential to the conception and definition of syngamy, and regard reduction as a criterion whereby true syngamic union of gametes and pronuclei can be distinguished from plastogamic and nuclear fusions which have nothing to do with the sexual process. " No fertilization without reduction " (Hartmann). But it must be acknowledged that in a great many cases of gamete-formation in Protozoa a reduction of the chromatin- 10 146 substance of the conjugating pronuclei cannot be deduced from observation, and could only be inferred from analogy. In the gamete-formation of Coccidium sckubergi, so carefully studied by Schaudinn (99), a large number of male pronuclei are formed simultaneously by local condensations of chromidia thrown off from the nucleus of the gametocyte, which is left behind in the residual protoplasm, with its conspicuous karyosome (Fig. 50) ; in the female gamete, also, the process of reduction appears to consist of a simple elimination of the karyosome (Fig. 75), a process which could be interpreted more naturally as elimination of effete vegetative chromatin than as a process of true nuclear reduction. In the case of Coccidium, as in others that might be cited, it must either be assumed that reduction-processes, in the strict sense of Fio. 75. — Four- stages in the maturation of the female gametooyte of Coccidium schubergi. A, Full-grown macrogametocyte contained in the host-cell ; B, the macrogametocyte is beginning to round itself off and to expel the karyosome from its nucleus ; 0, the Varyosome expelled from the nucleus of the macrogametocyte has reached the surface of the body and broken up into a number of fragments, which lie scattered in the body of the host-cell or are extruded from it ; D, the macrogametocyte has now become a ripe macro- gamete, having rounded itself off, eliminated the karyosome from its nucleus, and divested itself entirely of the host-cell, n., Nucleus of the gametooyte ; £., its karyosome ; n.', nucleus of the host-cell ; 4.', k.', fragments of extruded karyosome. After Schaudinn (99), magnified 1,000. the phrase, occur but have been overlooked, or that the method of reduction is one that can only be brought into line with the typical method by theoretical interpretation founded on analogy. It must therefore remain an open question, in the present state of our knowledge, whether a process of nuclear reduction strictly comparable to the process seen in Metazoa is essential to the definition of true syngamy, or whether such a process has not been evolved and perfected gradually as a consequence of the sexual process. It is quite conceivable that syngamy may have been at its first origin merely a process of intermingling of chromatin of distinct cell -individuals ; that in this crude and primitive form syngamy would tend to disturb the normal balance of nucleus and cytoplasm, since it would lead to quantitative excess of the SYNGAMY AND SEX IN THE PROTOZOA 147 nuclear substance; that, consequently, by a regulative process which may primitively have followed the syngamic union, the chromatin of the zygote was reduced to the normal quantity by elimination of half of its mass ; and that from this hypothetical primitive process of regulation of the nucleo-cytoplasmic balance a process of nuclear reduction preceding the syngamic act has been gradually evolved until it reaches its perfection in the form seen in the Metazoa. On this view, it is to be expected that in Protista a great diversity in the methods of nuclear reduction would occur, from those of the roughest type to others highly elaborated and perfected ; and this expectation certainly receives justification from the data of observation. Hertwig (119), on the other hand, compares the reducing divisions in the maturation of the gametes to the so-called " hunger-divisions " in Infusoria, which exhibit a great disproportion in the relative mass of nucleus and cytoplasm as the result of starvation in artificial cultures ; in such forms the body is smaller than in forms from a normal culture, but the nucleus is not merely relatively, but absolutely, larger than that of a normal form. The disturbance in the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio (see p. 70, supra) can, however, be regulated by reducing divisions of the nucleus. On the ground of this comparison, Hertwig considers that the maturative processes of the gametes are to be regarded as the necessary consequences of antecedent events* in the life-history — as processes which in their turn bring about syngamy, and not such as have the object of preparing the nuclei for fertilization. In order to give a more concrete idea of the processes of syngamy and reduction in Protozoa, a few typical examples will now be described, selected in order to illustrate the salient features of these processes. The most convenient method of classification of the examples chosen is to distinguish those cases in which chro- midia are present in addition to nuclei from those in which nuclei alone are present. 1. Syngamy and Reduction with Nuclei and ChromiMa. — In a great many Sarcodina, especially those belonging to the orders Amcabaea (p. 218) and Foraminifera (p. 231), chromidia may be present in the gamete-forming individuals as a permanent con- stituent of the body-structure. In such cases the chromidia represent, wholly or in part, the generative chromatin, and give rise, by formation of secondary nuclei, to the nuclei of the gametes. As an example Arcella may be taken, the life-cycle of which is described in a subsequent chapter. In this form two distinct forms of syngamy have been described. * It is, of course, hardly necessary to point out that starvation is by no means the only influence which can bring about a disturbance of the nucleo-cytoplasmic equilibrium ; over-nutrition, for example, may have the same effect. 148 THE PROTOZOA (a) Karyogamy. — The body of an Arcella gives rise by multiple gemmation to a number of amoebulse, each containing a secondary nucleus derived from the chromidia, while the primary nuclei of the parent-form degenerate (Fig. 80). The number and size of the amoebulae vary, however, in different individuals. In one Arcella the number is Jess and the amcebulae are larger, eight or nine macramcebce being produced. In another the amoebulse are more numerous and smaller, about forty micramcebce being formed. In either case the amoebulae swarm out of the parent-shell and are the gametes. A micramoeba copulates with a macramoeba, the two fusing completely to form a zygote with a synkaryon. The amoeboid zygote thus produced is the starting-point in the growth and development of an Arcella (Fig. 80, A). In this example the karyogamy is a case of microgamy, which, like other such cases, precedes a period of growth and follows a period of active reproduction. It is possible that the syngamy of the gametes is preceded by reducing divisions of the nuclei of the amoebulae, but no such reduction has been observed in Arcella. In Foraminifera (p. 235), in which the syngamy is perfectly isog- amous, each secondary nucleus formed from the generative chromidia divides twice to form the gamete-nuclei — divisions doubtless to be regarded as reducing divisions. In Centropyxis, according to Schaudinn (131), amoebulae, all of the same size, are produced as in Arcella, by formation of secondary nuclei ; but in some broods each amoebula divides into four micramoebae (micro- gametes), while in other broods the amoebulae remain undivided as macramoebae (macrogametes) ; copulation then takes place between two gametes of different size. (6) Chromidiogamy (Fig. 80, M — Q). — Two ordinary adult Arcettce come together and apply the mouths of their shells. The proto- plasm of one individual flows over almost entirely into the other shell, taking with it both chromidia and primary nuclei, only so much protoplasm being left in the one shell as suffices to hold the two shells together. The primary nuclei now degenerate, and the chromidia derived from each conjugant break up into a fine dust of chromatin-particles and become intimately commingled. When this process is complete, the protoplasm with the chromidia becomes again distributed between the two shells, and the two conjugants separate. Then in each individual secondary nuclei are formed from the chromidia, and by a process of multiple gem- mation a number of uninucleate amoebulae are formed which swarm out of the shell, and, like the zygotes resulting from karyogamy, become the starting-point of a new Arcella. Thus chromidiogamy is here a case of macrogamy which, like other similar cases, follows a period of growth and precedes a SYNGAMY AND SEX IN THE PROTOZOA 149 period of active reproduction. Chromidiogamy is a rare but very interesting form of syngamy which, from the standpoint of general notions with regard to the evolution of the nucleus, may be re- garded as the most primitive type. It is known to occur also in Difflugia (Zuelzer, 85), where also copulation of swarm-spores takes place as an alternative method (p. 230). A case must now be considered in which the chromidia represent vegetative, while the nuclei contain the generative, chromatin. An example of this state of things is furnished by Plasmodiophora brassiccB, a well-known parasite of cabbages, turnips, etc., in which Flu. 76. — Gamete-formation and syngamy in Plasmodiophora brassicce. A, Normal vegetative nuclei of the myxamcebffl ; B, G, extrusion of chromidia from the nuclei ; D, division of the nuclei by karyokinesis (first reducing division) ; E, nuclei after reduction ; F, formation of gametes which are fusing in pairs ; G, spore (zygote) containing two nuclei, one of which is going through a further reduction-division ; H, fusion of the two pronuclei within the spore ; I, ripe spore with synkaryon and two centrioles. After Prowazek (127), magnified about 2,250 diameters. it produces a disease known as " fingers and toes " (Kohlhernie). According to the investigations of Prowazek (127) and others, Plasmodiophora goes through a development which may be briefly summarized as follows : At the end of the " vegetative " period of growth and multiplication, there are found within the cells of the infected plant a numbey of " myxamoebae," amoeboid individuals (plasmodia) each with many nuclei containing distinct karyosomes (Fig. 76, A). From the nuclei chromidia are given off into the cell, and during this process the karyosomes disappear and centrosomes make their appearance (Fig. 76, B, C). The chromidia are ab- 150 THE PROTOZOA sorbed and disappear, and the nuclei divide twice by karyokinesis (Fig. 76, D), so that their number is quadrupled. The myxamoeba then undergoes multiple fission into as many cells as there are nuclei in the plasmodium (Fig. 76, F), and each of these cells is a gamete. The gametes now conjugate in pairs, and the zygotes become encysted to form the spores. Within the spores the nuclei of the gametes are stated to undergo a further process of reduction before they fuse to form the synkaryon (Fig. 76, (?). The syngamy in Plasmodiophora is stated to be a case of autogamy, but this allegation assumes that the nuclei of the myxamcebae are sister- nuclei derived all from the division of one original nucleus ; they may equally well be nuclei of different origins brought together by plastogamic fusions. The two examples selected, Arcetta and Plasmndiophora, show that the chromidia may represent generative chromatin in one case, vegetative in another. Goldschmidt (57) has proposed to distinguish these two conditions by a special terminology, retaining the name " chromidia " (trophochromidia, Mesnil, 74) for those which are purely vegetative, and coining a new term, sporetia (idio- chromidia, Mesnil) for those of generative nature. It is more convenient, however, to retain the term " chromidia " in ' its original significance, to denote simply exwanuclear particles of chromatin, and to qualify the term by the adjectives " vegetative " and " generative " when required (see also Goldschmidt, 41, p. 130). The formation of vegetative chromidia, which are finally absorbed, is a common phenomenon in many Protozoa ; it may take place as a purely regulative process, as in Actinosphcerium during de- pression-periods (p. 208), when hypertrophy of the nuclear apparatus is corrected by the extrusion from the nuclei of chromidia, which ultimately degenerate and become converted into masses of pig- ment, and as such are eliminated from the protoplasm. The account given by Bott (103) of gamete -formation in the common Pdomyxa (Amoebasa nuda, p. 227) describes a condition in which chromidia, extruded from the nuclei, are partly vegetative, partly generative ; secondary nuclei are formed from them, which later cast out a portion of their chromatin, then give rise to the gamete -nuclei. After the secondary nuclei have been purified in this way of their vegetative chromatin, the generative chromatin remaining in each of them forms a karyokinetic spindle with eight chromo- somes, and a reducing division follows by which each daughter-nucleus obtains four chromosomes. The " pronuclei of the first order, ' resulting from the first reducing division, divide again, forming a spindle with four chromosomes which split, so that the " pronuclei of the second order " have also four chro- mosomes. From the nuclei that have undergone reduction in this manner the nuclei of the gametes arise in a somewhat remarkable fashion : the pro- nuclei of the second order separate into two compact masses of chromatin ; a vacuole is formed near them ; and the chromatin of the two masses wanders, in the form of finely-tiivided granules, into the vacuole to form the definitive pronucleus of the gamete, which forms a membrane when the process is complete. When formed the gametes wander out as Holiozoon-like indi- SYNGAMY AND SEX IN THE PROTOZOA 151 viduals, which copulate in pairs, and the uninucleate zygote grows up into the multinucleate Pdomyxa. The conception of vegetative and generative chromidia has not been accepted universally or without criticism. Hartmann, as pointed out above, considers that many cases of generative chromidia are really the result of a disruption of a polyenergid nucleus ; Awerinzew (47) is of opinion that, while all Protozoa possess vegetative chromidia at some stage at least in the life- cycle, generative chromidia are to be considered as a new acquisition, a hasten- ing of the process of the formation of numerous gamete-nuclei ; Dobell (51) puts forward a similar view. with regard to generative chromidia. With regard to the latter criticism, it may be pointed out that nuclei may become resolved into chromidia in order to undergo simple binary fission. With regard to Hartmann's view, there is at present, at least, little evidence that it is an adequate explanation of the many cases of formation of secondary generative nuclei from chromidia known amongst the Sarcodina. The ques- tion is discussed further below (p. 255). 2. Syngamy and Reduction with Nuclei only. — A very simple example is furnished by the common Aetinophrys sol (Fig. 71), as described by Schaudinn (129). Conjugation takes place between two adult forms (macrogamy), which come together and become enclosed in a common cyst. The nucleus of each individual then divides by karyokinesis, and one nucleus of the pair thus produced is expelled from the body and undergoes degeneration as a reduction nucleus. The persistent nucleus of each individual then repeats the process and forms a second reduction-nucleus. The nucleus now remaining in each cell is the definitive pronucleus. The two gametes now copulate, their pronuclei fusing to form the synkaryon, after which the synkaryon divides by karyokinesis and the zygote divides into two individuals which later escape from the cyst and resume the free-living vegetative life. The course of syngamy in Actinophrys is exactly similar to that performed by the two " secondary cysts " derived from division of a " primary cyst " in Actinosphcerium (see p. 138, supra). In both cases alike the nucleus of the conjugants may be supposed to contain both vegetative and generative chromatin mixed together. It is possible that the vegetative chromatin is extruded from the nucleus in the form of chromidia prior to the reducing divisions, but no elimination of vegetative substance has been described. The last example of syngamy in Protozoa that need be con- sidered specially at this point is that of the Infusoria, which have been the subject of numerous investigations. These organisms present the highest degree of specialization of the body-structure and elaboration of the nuclear apparatus found in any Protozoa. Their syngamic processes vary in detail to some extent in different cases (see p. 448), but the whole process is essentially as follows (Fig. 77) : Two individuals come together and adhere, placing themselves side by side. The two conjugants may be similar in visible constitution, or may differ to a greater or less extent, and 152 THE PROTOZOA . 77. — Diagram showing the successive stages of conjugation in Infusoria. A, The two conjugants attached, each with a macronucleus (N) and a micro- nucleus (n) ; B, G, the micronucleus of each conjugant dividing ; D, each conjugant has two micronuclei which are beginning to divide again ; E, each conjugant has four micronuclei ; the macronuclei are beginning to become irregular in form ; in later stages they degenerate, break up, and are absorbed ; F, three of the four micronuclei of each conjugant are degenerating and being absorbed ; the fourth is dividing ; G, one half of each dividing micro- nucleus of the preceding stage has travelled over into the other conjugant as the migratory pronucleus ; H, I, fusion of the stationary pronucleus of each conjugant with the migratory pronucleus derived from the other conjugant to form the synkaryon (S.) ; J , the two conjugauts now separate ; in each ex-con jugant the synkaryon (S.) divides ; the old macronuclei are now almost completely absorbed ; K, L, the synkaryon has divided into two nuclei, one of which grows large and becomes the new mAcronucleus, the other remains small and becomes the new micronucleus, of each ex-conjugant. After Delage and Herouard. SYNGAMY AND SEX IN THE PROTOZOA 153 are sometimes markedly different in size (Doflein, 111). The greatest amount of differentiation is seen in the order Peritricha (p. 448), where microconjugants and macroconjugants can be dis- tinguished. Each conjugant has a micronucleus and a macro- nucleus. The macronucleus begins to degenerate, and finally dis- appears completely. The micronucleus, on the other hand, en- larges and divides by a simple form of karyokinesis (see p. 114, supra). The division of the micronucleus is repeated twice as a rule, but sometimes three times, and, as stated above, in one of these divisions the number of chromosomes is halved in a great many, possibly in all, cases. Of the four (or eight) micronuclei thus formed, all but one represent reduction-nuclei which are absorbed and disappear. The persistent micronucleus then divides by equating division into two pronuclei, which may be distinguished as migratory and stationary, respectively ; they sometimes exhibit distinct structural differentiation. At this juncture the cuticle of each conjugant is absorbed at the point of contact, and the migratory pronucleus of each conjugant passes over into the protoplasm of the other and fuses with its stationary pronucleus. The gap in the cuticle is now repaired and the two individuals separate, each " ex-conjugant " having a synkaryon constituted by a fusion of one-eighth (or one-sixteenth) of its own original micronucleus with the same fraction of the micronucleus of the other partner. The synkaryon grows and divides into two nuclei, one of which grows and becomes the macronucleus, while the other remains small and becomes the micronucleus, of the ex-conjugant, which thereby becomes indistinguishable from an ordinary in- dividual of the species, and proceeds to start on a course of vegeta- , tive growth and reproduction in the usual manner, until the next act of syngamy initiates a fresh cycle. It has been observed that the two ex-conjugants sometimes differ markedly in their capacities, one of them multiplying much faster than the other. In the syngamy of Ciliata it is seen clearly that the macronucleus represents effete vegetative or " somatic " chromatin, which is eliminated bodily from the life-history of the organism, while the micronucleus represents reserve generative chromatin from which, after reduction, the entire nuclear apparatus is regenerated. The remarkable feature in the syngamy of Infusoria is the manner in which- the conjugants remain distinct, and merely exchange pronuclei (so - called " partial karyogamy "). Versluys (137), following Boveri, derives this from an ancestral condition of iso- gamic copulation — that is to say, a condition in which the two conjugants fused completely as gametes, both body and nucleus, after which the zygote divided into two individuals ; on this view the final division of the micronucleus which gives rise to the two 154 THE PROTOZOA pronuclei is to be regarded as the equivalent of the division of the synkaryon which took place ancestrally after syngamy. While, however, there is a general agreement that partial karyogamy (conjugation) is to be derived from total karyogamy (copulation), it is very doubtful if the two conjugants in Infusoria represent simple gametes ; it is more probable that the type of syngamy characteristic of Infusoria is derived from an ancestral condition in which each conjugant produced a number of minute gametes (swarm-spores) which copulated (compare especially Popoff, 125, and Hartmann, 116, and see p. 453, infra). On this view the divisions of the micronucleus represent a primitively much larger number of divisions which produced the numerous gametes, and the conjugants themselves are not to be regarded as true gametes, but rather as gametocytes or gamonts. Having now illustrated by typical examples the various forms which the syngamic process takes in Protozoa, we may conclude this chapter by a consideration, necessarily brief, of the problem of the significance and origin of syngamy and sex. This is a problem which has a vast literature, and it is only possible here to indicate in outline some of the theories that have been put forward, none of which can claim to be a complete solution of one of the profoundest mysteries of the living substance and its activities. Considering first the fertilization of the Metazoa, it is evident that the union of the spermatozoon with the ovum has two prin- cipal results. In the first place the spermatozoon brings with it a pronucleus, the equivalent of that contained in the ovum, but derived from a distinct individual, and therefore possessing different hereditary tendencies acquired from its own particular ancestral history. The union of the male and female pronuclei brings about, therefore, a process for which Weismann has coined the term amphi- mixis— that is to say, a mingling of different hereditary tendencies in one and the same individual. In the second place the spermato- zoon produces a result which may be termed briefly " developmental stimulus " (Entwicklungserregung) — that is to say, it produces a disturbance in the equilibrium of the protoplasmic body of the ovum which causes it to start on a course of cell-division oft-re- peated, a process of cleavage which converts the unicellular ovum into the mass of cells which supplies the material for the building up of the multicellular body. It is very probable that the develop- mental stimulus is supplied by the greatly -developed centrosome of the spermatozoon, that of the ovum having completely atrophied, apparently, after the completion of its maturative processes. The introduction of a male pronucleus — that is to say, the process of ampHimixis — can be effected only by the spermatozoon. But the researches of Loeb and others have demonstrated fully that the SYNGAMY AND SEX IN THE PROTOZOA 155 spermatozoon is not indispensable for supplying a developmental stimulus ; an unfertilized ovum can be induced by artificial stimuli of various kinds to start upon a course of development similar to that initiated, under natural circumstances, by fertilization with a spermatozoon. Hence, of the two results produced in the fertiliza- tion of Metazoa, amphimixis alone would appear to be that which is essential and peculiar in the process, and which only fertilization can bring about. From the above considerations, amphimixis is regarded by many thinkers as the essence of syngamy, a necessity for the evolution of living beings in that it supplies, by the intermingling of different hereditary tendencies, the conditions required for the production of " innate " variations in organisms in which the germinal substance is shielded from the direct influence of external conditions by its position within a multicellular body. Apart from the question, however, whether any such innate variations exist in the Protozoa, where all colls alike are exposed equally to the direct action of the environment, the criticism has often been made that amphimixis gives only a teleological explanation of the sexual process, and as such cannot be invoked as a causal explanation of its origin. The intermingling of distinct hereditary tendencies, however useful to the organism or important in the evolution of living beings generally, cannot be regarded as the incentive to syngamy at its first appear- ance in the Protista. In other words, amphimixis must be regarded as a secondary consequence not as a primary cause, of syngamy. It is necessary, therefore, to seek some explanation for the first origin of syngamy other than the benefits which it may confer through amphimixis, and it is undoubtedly among Protist organisms that the conditions under which syngamy first arose must be sought. It has been pointed out above that syngamy appears to have a strengthening or recuperating effect upon the cell- organism, and upon such grounds has been founded the theory of " rejuven- escence " (Verjiingung). According to this theory, connected chiefly with the name of Maupas, the cell-protoplasm, after many generations of reproduction by fission, tends to become effete and senile to an ever - increasing degree, a condition which, if not remedied, ends in the death of the organism ; the natural remedy is furnished, however, by the process of syngamy, .which has the effect of renewing the " youth " of the cell and starting it upon a fresh series of generations, until senility, once more supervening, necessitates syngamy again. The rejuvenescence- theory has been criticized by many critics who have themselves done little more, in some cases, than give a more precise meaning to the terms " youth " and " old age," terms that certainly stand in need of further explanation, since 156 THE PROTOZOA it can hardly be supposed that the time-factor alone can account for the exhaustion or depression of the vital faculties. It Is gener- ally admitted that unicellular organisms, such as the Protozoa, tend, after a greater or less number of generations, to exhibit a certain degree of exhaustion in their vital properties, or, it may be, of derangement in their organization and vital mechanisms. Hert- wig (164) is of opinion that " the conditions of death exist in the living substance from the beginning, and are a necessary conse- quence of its vital function " — a generalization which may be accepted for those Protista in which the body exhibits the degree of specialization and structural complication proper to a true cell (as the term is understood in this book — see p. 98) ; but it is very doubtful if it is true also for the simplest forms of life, such as the bacteria and allied organisms. If it be further admitted that syngamy is the natural remedy in unicellular organisms for a natural disease, the problem before us is to discover, if possible, the precise nature of the derangements, and of the method by which the remedy restores them to the normal functional condition. At the outset, attention must be drawn to a very constant and general preliminary to syngamy in Protozoa — namely, the elimina- tion of a large amount of chromatin which appears to have been regulating the vital activities during previous generations (vegeta- tive chromatin), and its replacement by chromatin which has been inactive and lying in reserve (generative chromatui). This process is seen in its most striking form in the Ciliata, where the macro- nucleus is entirely eliminated during the act of syngamy, and is replaced in subsequent generations by a new macronucleus derived from the micronucleus formed by fusion of portions of the micro- nuclei of the partners in syngamy. Hence it might seem as if the chief result of syngamy was to replace effete vegetative chromatin by fresh generative substance which through inactivity has retained its powers unimpaired. But in the first place it must be pointed out that, to effect a replacement of this kind, the union of two individuals is not necessary ; it would be sufficient for a single individual to form a new nucleus from its store of generative chromatin, and to get rid of its old, effete vegetative chromatin. If we regard the chromidia of Arcetta as composed of generative chromatin, the buds produced by formation of secondary nuclei from the chromidia would represent nuclear regeneration of this kind. Secondly, it is open to doubt how far the theory of vegeta- tive and generative chromatin can be applied throughout the whole series. In such forms as Arcella the chromidial mass, although it furnishes the gamete-nuclei, is a cell-element in a functional con- dition, and in the more primitive forms the distinction between vegetative and generative chromatin cannot be pressed so far as SYNGAMY AND SEX IN THE PROTOZOA 157 in highly-organized forms, such as .the Ciliata. Hertwig (68) con- siders that the separation of two kinds of chromatin is an adaptation to particular conditions of life, evolved progressively, and attaining its greatest perfection in the Ciliata ; whereby chromatin which has become functionally effete is separated from that which has retained its constitution. According to the view put forward by Hertwig (118), syngamy remedies the effete condition of the cell chiefly by regulating the necessary quantitative balance between the nucleus and the cyto- plasm. Such regulation may be effected also by internal re- arrangements of the nucleai substance or by plastogomy, but is brought about most efficiently by syngamy, since the definite and necessary mutual relations between nucleus and cytoplasm are better maintained by " arrangements which prevent disturbance, than by arrangements which compensate for disturbances that have already set in." The obvious criticism of this theory is that it is difficult to understand why an internal regulative process of the cell should require the co-operation of two individuals, and the reason contained in the sentence just quoted from Hertwig scarcely seems an adequate explanation. The fact that two cells participate in syngamy indicates in itself that the necessity for syngamy depends on a loss of balance between two constituents or substances in the cell, and that the union of the two gametes restores equilibrium. As Hertwig (119) has pointed out, the quantitative relation of nucleus to cytoplasm is more altered in the gametes of Metazoa than in any other cells, and to opposite extremes in the two sexes ; in the ovum the quantity of cytoplasm is enormous in proportion to the nucleus, while in the spermatozoon the exact reverse is the case. The same argu- ment applies to a greater or less degree in the case of anisogamous gametes of Protozoa. It would not, however, apply to the many cases of isogamy in Protozoa where the quantitative relations of nucleus and cytoplasm are the same in each gamete ; in such cases union of the gametes would leave the nucleo-cytoplasmic relation exactly what it was before. A theory of a different kind has been put forward by Schaudinn (133) and his followers Prowazek (128) and Hartmann (116), which is based on the notion that sex and sexual differentiation are primary characteristics of living matter. A normally function- ing cell is regarded as hermaphrodite, having male and female elements equally balanced. The differentiation which leads to the formation of gametes arises, as Biitschli originally suggested, from inequalities in the results of cell-division, which may be supposed to lead always to more or less imperfect partition of the qualities of the parent-cell between the daughter-cells. As a result 158 THE PROTOZOA of the defects in the process of cell division, some cells acquire more " male " properties, other more " female " ; the cells preponder- atingly male show greater kinetic and motile energy, those that have more female qualities show greater trophic activity. With con - timied cell-division these opposite tendencies tend to accumulate in certain cells which in consequence become altogether one-sided in their vital activities. Thus a want of balance in the vital functions is brought about, which may reach such a pitch that the organism is unable to continue to assimilate and reproduce, and must die unless the balance is resorted by syngamy with an individual that has become specialized in the opposite direction. By the union of two gametes differentiated in this manner, equilibrium is restored and the vital functions are reinvigorated. No gametes, however, whatever their degree of specialisation, are to be considered as perfectly unisexual, but only relatively so ; a male gamete will always contain a certain amount of female substance, and a female gamete a certain amount of male substance, thus accounting for the possibility of partheno- genesis. Schaudinn's theory of sex is thus very similar to that developed by Weininger on purely psychological grounds. Schaudinn, whose work on Protozoa must secure full considera- tion foi any statement of his observations, however inherently improbable the facts or the interpretations based upon thorn may seem, founded his theory chiefly on data alleged to have been observed by him in the development of Trypanosoma noctuw (Schau- dinn, 132). According to him, an " indifferent " ookinete might give rise either to male or female forms. In the formation of males, certain nuclear elements were separated out to become those of the daughter-cells, while certain other nuclear elements remained behind and degenerated together with a quantity of residual protoplasm. In the formation of females, the same two sets of nuclear structures were separated out, but those proper to the male sex degenerated, while those of the female sex, which were just those which degenerated in the formation of males, in this case persist and become the nucleus of the female gamete. Thus the indifferent ookinete was supposed to be really hermaphrodite, containing male and female elements mixed together, and giving rise to individuals of one or the other sex by persistence of one set of characters and atrophy of the other. It must be noted here that these observations of Schaudinn's are entirely unconfirmed, nothing similar having as yet been found by other investigators, either in trypanosomes or in any other Protozoa ; and further that, even if Schaudinn's observations be accepted as exact in every detail, they will not bear the interpretations which he places upon them — namely, that the small and large forms produced as he describes are males and females, since, as he himself admits, they do not, SYNGAMY AND SEX IN THE PROTOZOA 159 when' developed, perform any act of syngamy. The alleged sexuality of the forms described by Schaudinn lacks the only de- cisive criterion of sexual differentiation — namely, sexual behaviour ; and the differentiation exhibited by the two forms of trypanosomes described by Schaudinn admits of an entirely different and far less forced interpretation (see p. 176, infra). There are two further criticisms that may be made of Schaudinn's theory. The first concerns the alleged universality of sexual differences in living matter It must be pointed out that, as stated above, at the present time we have no evidence whatever of the occurrence of true syngamy in any organisms of the bacterial grade. The processes that have been interpreted by Schaudinn as autogamy in certain bacteria may be much more easily regarded as processes of internal regulation of the chromatin-substance. Nowhere yet has the union of two distinct gametes been observed in any bacterial organisms. The theory that sex is a universal characteristic, and syngamy an elementary function, of living things, does not rest at the present time on any basis of established fact. The second criticism is that the terms " male " and " female " require definition and explanation, without which they remain meaningless, connoting merely unknown, mystic properties, not further analyzable, of the living substance. The characteristic feature exhibited by male cells is the preponderance of kinetic activity, and by female cells, of trophic functions, as Schaudinn and many others have pointed out. Before Schaudinn, the same idea was expressed in different language by Geddes and Thomson (114), who regarded the male sex as characterized by katabolic, the female sex by anabolic activities. It we suppose that these two manifestations of physiological activity have each a distinct material basis in the living cell, then it can easily be imagined that the imperfections of cell-division may lead to the production of cells in which one or. the other substance predominates. This is the view that Doflein (7) has developed in his very interesting critical summary of the views that have been put forward upon the sexual problem. He supposes, further, that these two different physio- logical qualities depend upon substances which have intense mutual interactions and attract each other strongly, and that a certain equilibrium between them is necessary for the normal life of the cell. When, therefore, one or the other substance preponderates greatly in a cell, a functional derangement results ; but since cells differentiated in opposite directions attract each other strongly, they tend to unite, and by their union to restore equilibrium. The question of the sexual differentiation of the gametes is one that will be discussed at greater length in the next chapter. It is only necessary to point out here that a clear distinction must be 160 THE PROTOZOA drawn Between intrinsic differences, not necessarily visible, and structural or other differences which are more or less obvious. The fact that gametes and pronuclei tend to unite proves that in all cases there must be intrinsic differences between them which stimulate them to do so ; in this sense, at least, we may endorse fully the dictum of Hertwig, that " fertilization depends on a fusion of sexually-differentiated cell-nuclei." On the other hand, gametes of opposite sexes exhibit every possible condition from complete similarity in structure and appearance to the greatest possible contrast in every feature of their organization. There can be no doubt that visible differentiation of the gametes is largely, if not entirely, an adaptation to the functions that they have to perform ; and this conclusion is by no means weakened by the fact that there are many cases of isogamy which are un- doubtedly secondary, in which a more primitive and phylogeneti- cally older structural differentiation has gradually become annulled, under circumstances in which adaptive differences in the gametes are no longer necessary — as, for example, in gregarines (p. 173). In Metazoa it is generally recognized that the two pronuclei that undergo fusion are perfectly equivalent,* and that the dif- ferences seen between them in the gametes are temporary and, in the case of the spermatozoon, an adaptation to circumstances ; here the real differentiation of the gametes affects only cytoplasmic characters. In Protozoa, on the other hand, the conjugating pronuclei often exhibit differences of structure when the cells themselves appear perfectly similar. In the Infusoria, for instance, differences have been noted between the migratory and stationary pronuclei ; how far these differences may be correlated directly with the differences in their activities must remain an open question. In the foregoing paragraphs we have set forth and discussed some of the attempts that have been made to solve the problem of sex. It cannot be said that a perfectly satisfactory solution has been attained, but at least certain conditions of the problem may be laid down. In the first place, no theory of sex is satis- factory which does not explain why the union of two cells should be necessary in syngamy. In .the second place a teleological inter- pretation, such, as amphimixis, can only state a secondary con- sequence, not a primary cause, of sexual union ; but such a consequence may suffice to explain the retention and persistence of sexual phenomena after the conditions have ceased to exist under which they came- into existence. In the simplest Protista of the bacterial grade, it may be supposed, either that the living matter is not differentiated into localized substances having distinct physiological qualities, or that in such * Apart, that is to say, from the much -discussed question of the supernumerary chromosome. SYNGAMY AND SEX IN THE PROTOZOA 161 minute bodies reproduction by fission does not produce differentia- tion in the fission-products. With increased size such differences may arise, at first to a minor extent, and capable of being adjusted by internal rearrangements of the living substance such as have been described in the larger Bacteria. Not until the process of natural evolution had gone so far as to produce the full complica- tion of structure seen in a true cell would localized differences in the living substance be brought about to a sufficient extent to lead to differences between the daughter-cells produced by fission, as a consequence of the imperfections of the process of cell-division. The differences produced in this way might be changes in the nucleo-cytoplasmic balance, as Hertwig supposes, or in the relative proportions of substances exerting different physiological activities, as suggested by Biitschli, Geddes and Thomson, Schaudinn and Doflein, or possibly of all these and other changes yet unknown. In any case it is reasonable to suppose that the imperfect character of the primitive types of cell -division, described in the last chapter, might produce accumulated material or structural inequalities in the daughter-cells, such as could only be rectified by the union of two cells differentiated in opposite directions, thus making syngamy a necessity for the continued existence of the species. This theory explains the necessity for syngamy recurring with greater frequency in forms having a high degree of structural differentiation than in forms of a primitive and simple type of organization. With increasing perfection in the process of the division of the cell, and especially of the nucleus, the primary cause of, or necessity for, syngamy might be expected to disappear ; but at this stage in evolution other benefits to the species consequent on the process of amphimixis might be a sufficient cause for the retention of a process already well established. This conclusion appears to receive some support from the fact that intensive culture, whether artificial, or natural as in parasitism, seems to diminish the necessity for syngamy. It can hardly be supposed that intensive culture can diminish consequences arising from defective cell-division ; but it might conceivably produce a strengthening effect equal to, and capable of supplanting, the benefits derived from amphimixis. Enriques (113) has stated that in Infusoria ex-conjugants may proceed to conjugation again, so that between one act of syngamy and the next there may not be a single cell-division intervening. In this case neither cell-division nor any consequences of cell- division can be the factor bringing about sexual union, but some other explanation must be sought. Enriques considers that the function of syngamy in Infusoria is to maintain the fixity of the species. Bibliography. — For references see p. 479. 1) CHAPTER IX POLYMORPHISM AND LIFE-CYCLES OF THE PROTOZOA A. POLYMORPHISM. ONE of the most striking peculiarities of living beings is the infinite variety of form, structure, and appearance, which they present. There is, perhaps, no living individual of any kind which is exactly similar, in all respects, to any other. Nevertheless, the most uncultured intellect cannot fail to recognize that, in the case of all ordinary, familiar plants and animals there is a pronounced tendency to segregation into distinct kinds or species — that is to say, natural groups of individuals which, though they may vary greatly amongst themselves, yet resemble one another far more than they do the individuals of another species. It is not necessary to point out that species are not to be regarded as permanent or immutable entities. It is certain that a species may in course of time become modified so as to acquire characters different from those it originally possessed, thus giving rise to a new species, or that a single parent-species may become split up into a number of groups which, by a similar process of modification, became so many daughter-species differing from one another and from the parent- species to a greater or less degree. The problem of the origin of species is one that it is not necessary to discuss here ; it is sufficient to point out that the mutability of species often makes it very difficult to define or delimit a given species exactly, of which a striking example is seen in the pathogenic trypanosomes of the brucii - group, probably to be regarded, as pointed out above (p. 27), as instances of species in an incipient or nascent condition. Some species are sharply marked off from others, some are much less so, and some are of questionable rank, regarded by one naturalist as distinct, by another as mere races or varieties — a state of things perfectly intelligible if existing species are regarded as having arisen by descent, with modification, from pre-existing species. In the Protozoa the existence of distinct species is just as marked as in the higher plants and animals, and is universally recognized. As has been pointed out in the previous chapter, it is probably syngamy which is responsible for the segregation of individuals 162 POLYMORPHISM AND LIFE-CYCLES 163 into species, by blending the divergent characters that may be supposed to arise from the influence of different conditions or circumstances of life. Thus, syngamy in unicellular organisms appears to have an effect which is the opposite, to a large extent^ to that which it produces in multicellular organisms, in which there are special germ-cells, sheltered to a greater or less degree from the direct influence of the environment, and in which amphimixis appears rather to be a means by which variations arise. The conception of a species is by no means incompatible with the occurrence of a number of distinct forms in its life-history. Taking well-known instances from the Metazoa, there may be, in the first place, ontogenetic or developmental differences ; not only may the individuals of the same species differ in size at different periods in the development, but they may differ so greatly in appearance and structure that only a knowledge of the life-history enables us to assert that they belong to the same species — as, for example, a caterpillar and a butterfly, or a hydroid and a medusa. Secondly, the adult individuals may differ to an enormous extent in the two sexes. Thirdly, there may be in many cases differences between individuals of a species related to differences in the functions which they perform, not merely at successive phases in the life-history, as in some cases of ontogenetic differentiation already mentioned, but even at corresponding phases of the life-history — a phenomenon best seen in social or colony-forming organisms, as in the case of ants and termites, or in the colonies of Hydrozoa. In Protozoa, similarly, a given species may show distinct phases or forms at different or corresponding periods of its life-history to a greater or less extent. In some species the form-changes are very slight, and the individuals occur always under a similar form and aspect, at least during the active state, and are therefore recog- nizable without difficulty as regards their specific identity ; such forms may be termed monomorphic, and as examples the species of ciliate Infusoria can be cited. Other Protozoa, on the other hand, are extremely polymorphic — that is to say, they occur under a variety of widely-differing forms at different stages in the life-cycle or in response to variations in the conditions of life. Hence it is often difficult or impossible to refer a given form to its proper species without tracing out its life-history and following its develop- ment step by step. The unravelling of the complicated life-cycles of Protozoa is attended by far greater difficulties than in Metazoa, since one important criterion fails us altogether in the Protozoa, that, namely, of sexual maturity. A naturalist has no hesitation in pronouncing a trochophore to be a larval form, and a rotifer to be an adult organism, from the fact that the former is sexually immature, while the latter produces ripe generative cells. In the 164 THE PROTOZOA Protozoa, however, there is no visible criterion of any similar state of maturity or the opposite which might be a guide in estimating the significance of a particular form. It is certain that with in- creasing knowledge many species of Protozoa now regarded as distinct will prove to be developmental stages of others, as has happened so frequently in the case of Metazoa. The polymorphism of the Protozoa may be related directly or indirectly to a variety of causes, which may be grouped generally under three headings — life-conditions, growth and development of the individual, and sex, 1. Polymorphism in Relation to the Conditions of Life. — Under this heading are included all those cases where the individual is forced to adapt itself to inevitable changes in the environment/ or else succumb to their effects ; hence this type of polymorphism may be termed briefly adaptive. The animal may adapt itself to such changes in one or the other of two ways : passively, by passing into a resting state, in which vital activities are temporarily sus- pended ; or actively, by changes of form, structure, and function, adapted to the changed conditions. Methods of passive adaptation to unfavourable conditions occur probably in all Protozoa. — perhaps it might be said in all Protista, so that no species can be said to be absolutely monomorphic. The commonest form of such adaptation is the process of encystment, whereby the organism protects itself by secreting a firm, resistant envelope, or cyst, round its body. The first preliminary to encystment in Protozoa is usually a rounding off of the body-form. In the case of naked amoeboid forms such a change of form follows naturally, as pointed out above, from cessation of the locomotor activity. It is, however, also observed that a similar change takes place in corticate forms, a phenomenon which indicates that the cuticle or cortex must be absorbed, or softened, and that any internal form-giving element* must be dissolved, so that the protoplasm is free to conform to the natural physical tendencies of a fluid body. In the great majority of cases, an individual in process of encystment becomes perfectly spherical, whatever may have been the form of its body in the active state, but in some cases the spherical form is not fully attained, and the body becomes ovoid or pear-shaped. During the process of rounding off, any food-particles or foreign bodies contained in the cytoplasm are rejected or absorbed, as a rule ; the contractile vacuoles, if there be any, cease to be formed and vanish ; and all locomotor organs, such as cilia, flagella, and of course pseudo- podia, are absorbed or cast off. At the same time the protoplasm of the organism becomes less fluid and more opaque, and usually diminishes appreciably in bulk, probably through loss of water ; it POLYMORPHISM AND LIFE-CYCLES 165 thereby becomes denser in consistence, but of less specific gravity Lastly, the cyst-membrane itself appears round the body, if it has not already done so ; it generally stands off distinctly from the surface of the body, and may vary in nature in different cases, from a soft, slimy or gelatinous coat to a firm membrane of variable thickness, often exceedingly tough and impervious. In the encysted state, Protozoa are able to withstand the many vicissitudes to which they are naturally subject. They can then be dried up, frozen, or sun-baked ; and since the protoplasm becomes much lighter, they can be transported great distances by winds, a fact which accounts for the appearance of Protozoa in infusions exposed to the air in any situation — a peculiarity from which the name Infusoria is derived. In general the function of encystment is to protect the organism against unfavourable conditions or violent changes in the environment — for instance, in freshwater forms, against drought and climate, the cold of winter or the heat of a tropical summer. In parasitic forms it is an adaptation commonly connected with a change from one host to another. In parasites two types of cysts can be distinguished. In the first place, full-grown forms may produce relatively large, resistant cysts (Dauerzysten) of the ordinary type, almost invariably sphe'rical or ovoid in form. In the second place, the smallest forms in the developmental cycle, the products of multiple fission or " sporulation," may secrete round themselves tough, resistant envelopes, within which they may multiply further ; in this case the envelope is termed a sporocyst, and the entire body a spore.* * The word " spore " has come to be used hi two distinct senses, as applied to Protozoa, thereby producing a regrettable confusion and ambiguity. The word itself is derived from the Greek but with motor mechanisms strongly developed ; it is prodigal of substance, and many are produced, but few are favoured by destiny. In extreme cases the female gamete is a relatively huge, inert cell, incapable of movement, crammed with foodstuffs ; the male is excessively minute, and is practically nothing but a nucleus which has its constituent parts packed into the smallest possible space, and with motor mechanisms attached to it. In reviewing the progressive differentiation of the gametes in Protozoa, it is convenient to treat separately those forms in which there is little or no ontogenetic differentiation from those in which there is a more or less pronounced difference between the young and adult forms. An example of the first type is seen in Copromonas (Fig. Ill), in which the gametes are ordinary individuals of the species, only differing in that their nuclei Jiave undergone a process of reduction. Good examples of monomorphic forms are furnished also by the Infusoria, a group in which a species may be free-swim- ming, or may be more or less permanently attached and sessile in habit. In the free-swimining ciliate Infusoria, sexual differences in the conjugants are frequently not discernible ; if they exist, they can only be inferred from the fact that syngamy takes place, or from subsequent behaviour of the individuals after conjugation, as, for instance, the fact observed by Calkins, that in Paramecium one ex- conjugant multiplies much more rapidly than the other. In other cases differences of size more or less pronounced are exhibited by the conjugants (Doflein, 111). As pointed out above, differences of structure have also been noted in some cases between the stationary and migratory pronuclei produced by a conjugant. Colh'n (50), however, was unable to find the slightest morphological differentiation of the conjugating pronuclei of Anoplophrya. In the sedentary Infusoria, sexual differentiation may be as little 172 THE PROTOZOA m.er apparent as in the free-swimming species, ad, for instance, in Acinetaria, where conjugation can take place between two adjacent individuals each on its own stalk. But in the Vorticellids special free-swimming individuals, microconjugants, are developed which are budded off from a sedentary individual, and then acquire cilia, swim off, and conjugate with another sedentary individual (Fig. 78). It seems obvious that this state of affairs is an adaptation to the exigencies of a sedentary life to insure cross- feriilization analogous to the formation of complemental males in the Cirripedes. The free - swimming microconjugants of Vorti- cellids are commonly termed " males," but it is open to question whether, strictly speaking, they de3erve that title. It is in species with marked differences between young and adult forms that the greatest differentiation of the gametes occurs, though by no means universally even in such forms. In polymorphic species of this type, three different conditions can be distinguished, to which reference has been made in the previous chapter. FIG. 78. — Vorticetta micro- \ Macrogamy — that is to say, syngamy stoma, Ehrb. On the left , , , ,, . ,. ., , ,,, . an ordinary, sedentary between full-grown individuals of the species. individual (macroconju- In this type the gametes appear to be always gant) with two microcon- ^rfp^flv aimi]ar 8O far as is known • ftT- jugants (w.c.) attached Pe] ar> f to it, one of which (to amples are seen in Actincphrys (Fig. 71), OnaCtthe *ke chromidiogamy of Arcella (Fig. 80), and possibly Noctiluca (p. 279). 2. Microgamy — syngamy between the nucleus ; P, peristome and adoral ciliary spiral. After Hickson. conjugation. right is an individual with the stalk contracted and the body enclosed in a cyst. N, Macro- youngest individuals, products of the rapid multiplication of an adult. Conjugation of swarm-spores is by far the commonest type of syngamy in Protozoa, and may be re- garded as the normal type. In this case there is usually complete iscgamy, as in Foraminifera (p. 235), sometimes slight anisogamy, as in Radiolaria (p. 254, Fig. 108). 3. Mixed microgamy and macrogamy — that is to say, syngamy between a full-sized adult individual on the one hand and a minute individual, a swarm-spore, on the other hand. This type may be regarded as derived from microgamy by progressive, and finally complete, inhibition of the divisions that produce the swarm-spores in one sex — possibly also with an enhanced tendency to such divisions in the other sex. Thus in Arcetta, as described in the previous POLYMORPHISM AND LIFE-CYCLES 173 chapter, the macramoebse produced are fewer than the micramcebae, showing that the tendency to division is more restricted in the former case than in the latter. Again, in the development of Centro- pyxis, as described by Schaudinn (131), formation of gametes is initiated by a process of multiple fission sombined with formation of secondary nuclei from chromidia, as in Arcella, and in this way a number of amcebulae are produced. The amoebulse from one Centropyxis remain undivided-, as macramoebse, while those pro- duced from another adult divide each into four micramosbse ; syngamy takes place later between a micramoeba and a macramoeba, after each has secreted for itself a shell. When the inhibition of the gamete-forming divisions is quite complete in one sex, the result is the most pronounced type of anisogamy occurring in Protozoa ; and, conversely, it may be said that all cases of extreme anisogamy in Protozoa are of this type. In Metazoa the disproportion in the size of the gametes is mainly due to the relatively enormous growth of the gametocyte, partly also to the inequality of the four cells produced by the reducing divisions, in the female sex. In Protozoa with extreme differen- tiation of gametes, on the other hand, such as the Coccidia and Hsemosporidia, the garnetocytes do not differ greatly, sometimes not at all, in size, though the female gametocyte may contain more reserve food - material, and consequently less protoplasm. The disproportion of the gametes is due almost entirely to the fact that in the female sex the gametocyte does not divide, but becomes a single macrogamete, while the male gametocyte sporulates to produce a larger or smaller number of microgametes. Very instructive in this respect is the comparison of the formation of the gametes in the gregarines (p. 331) and the coccidia (p. 346) respectively, two groups of Protozoa which are certainly closely allied to one another. In such a form as Coccidium (Fig. 152), the gametocytes remain separate one from the other, and the male gametocyte forms numerous minute microgametes which swarm away ; the female gametocyte, on the other hand, becomes a macro- gamete after going through a process of reduction, and is fertilized by a single microgamete. In gregarines, however, the gametocytes associate in couples, either before or after attaining their full size, and become surrounded by a common cyst, within which each gametocyte sporulates to produce a large number of small gametes. The gametes of gregarines can be arranged in a series, showing marked anisogamy at one end, complete isogamy at the other. Thus in Pterocephalus (Fig. 79, A, B) the gametes are very unequal in size, and the microgametes are motile, the macrogametes not so. In Stylorhynchus the gametes of opposite sexes are equal in size, but in one sex the gametes are motile, -in the other not (Fig. 79, 174 THE PROTOZOA C, D). In M&nocystis (Fig. 79, O — L) the gametes differ slightly in size in the two sexes, but have no organs of locomotion in either case. In Urospora (Fig. 79, E, F) the gametes are not appreciably different in size, but in those of one sex the nuclei are slightly smaller than in those of the other. Finally, in Gregarina, Diplodina, and many other genera, no difference whatever is perceptible between the two gametes that perform syngamy. In those gre- garines which have dimorphic gametes, syngamy is always between two dissimilar individuals of distinct parentage, and it may be inferred, therefore, that in all cases alike the gametes that unite are derived from distinct gametocytes. FIG. 79. — Gametes of different species of gregarines. A, Male, B, female, gamete of Pterocephalus (Nina) gracilia. G and D, Stylorhynchua longicoUis : C, male gamete ; D, male gamete attaching itself to a female. E, Male, F, female, gamete of Urospora lagidis, showing differences in the size of the nuclei. G — L, Monocystis sp. : 0, male gamete ; H, female ; /, union of the two gametes, the nuclei still separate ; J, the two nuclei fusing ; K, the zygote becoming elongated ; L, the zygote has taken the form of the spore, and in the synkaryo.n a centrosome has appeared, preparatory to division. A and B after Leger and Dubosoq ; C and D after Leger ; E — L after Brasil. From a comparison of the life-cycles of the Coccidia and the Gregarines respectively (see p. 354, infra), it is highly probable that in the common ancestor of the two- groups the gametocytes were separate, as in Coccidium, and each produced numerous gametes, as in Gregarines. Since the gametes had to find each other, by a process of adaptation, those of one sex became smaller and more motile (microgametes), while those of the other sex were more bulky and inert (macrogametes). In the course of their evolution from this primitive ancestral type, the Coccidia, with some exceptions presently to be noted, retained the habit of the gametocytes, remaining separate, and the specialization of the gametes became greatly increased, as an adap- POLYMORPHISM AND LIFE-CYCLES 175 tation to this condition, the female gametocyte ceasing to divide and becoming a single macrogamete, while the male gametocyte produced a swarm of minute, motile miorogametes. Only in a few Coccidia, exemplified by the genus Addea (Fig. 154), did the gametocytes acquire the habit of association before forming gametes, a habit which led in this case to a reduction of the number of micro- gametes produced to four, of which one fertilizes the macrogamete, while the other three perish. It is clear that the formation of microgametes in close proximity to the macrogamete increases vastly the chance of the gametes finding each other, and renders unnecessary the production of a swarm of microgametes. In the gregarines, on the other hand, the gametocytes acquired the habit of associating and forming their gametes in a common cyst. Under these circumstances it becomes a certainty that a gamete of either sex will find a partner if the gametes of each sex are in equal numbers. Consequently there is seen in gregarines a progressive tendency, illustrated by the examples cited above, to disappearance of those characters of the gametes which are an adaptation to the necessity of the sexes coming together, culminating in production of gametes of opposite sexes which are perfectly similar. On this view the isogamy seen in many gregarines is a secondary condition brought about by the gradual obliteration of adaptive differences between the gametes of opposite sexes, under circumstances which render such differences unnecessary. The comparison of the gamete-formation in different species of gregarines furnishes an instance of a progressive levelling-down of structural differentia- tion of gametes, under conditions in which no such differentiation is required, until an anisogamy undoubtedly primitive has been reduced secondarily to a perfect isogamy. This has led to the view expressed in many quarters, that auisogamy is in all cases a primitive, isogamy a secondary, condition. The case of the gregarines is by no means adequate, however, to support so sweeping a generalization ; the only conclusion that can be drawn from it is that adaptive differences tend to disappear when the conditions to which they are an adaptation no longer exist ; and the very fact that the obvious structural differentiation between the gametes vanishes in such a case is of itself a proof that such differentiation is not the expression of intrinsic constitutional differences between the gametes, for such differences could not be annihilated merely by changed conditions of environment. There can be no doubt that anisogamy in the form of visible structural differences between the gametes of opposite sexes must have been acquired very early by gametes as an adaptation to their functions. On the other hand, it is highly improbable, to say the least, that the earliest gametes, when the sexual process was first invented, so to speak, were structurally differentiated. It must, of course, be postulated that the gametes possess such intrinsic constitutional differences as would account for their behaviour — that is to say, their mutual attraction and union ; and in this sense anisogamy may be considered as a universal and primitive phenomenon. But the number of cases in which gametes are perfectly isogamous, as regards visible struc- tural or other differences, is a sufficient proof that purely constitutional anisogamy does not necessarily express itself in perceptible differentiation of the gametes. 176 THE PROTOZOA So far only primary sexual differences — that is to say, those between the actual gametes — have been discussed ; but, as has, been stated above, the sexual differentiation may be thrown back, as it were, into generations preceding the gametes. Thus, it is by no means uncommon, especially in Coccidia and Haemosporidia, for the gametocytes to be clearly distinguishable according to sex, the female gametocyte having ijhe cytoplasm loaded with reserve food- material, and usually with a smaller nucleus, while the male gameto- cyte has the cytoplasm clear and free from inclusions, and the nucleus is relatively large. In Addea the male gametocyte is very much smaller than the female (Fig. 154). In Cyclospora caryolytica, parasitic in the mole, the sexual differentiation is carried back through generations antecedent to the gametocytes, and, according to Schaudinn (147), male and female merozoites can be distinguished. The various types of polymorphism that have been discussed in this chapter may be classified as follows : 1. Adaptive polymorphism. (1) Passive. (2) Active. 2. Ontogenetic polymorphism. (1) In size alone. (2) In structure also. (a) Recapitulative. (b) Adaptive. 3. Sexual polymorphism. (1) Primary (of gametes). (2) Secondary. (a) Of gametocytes alone. (b) Of other generations also. In the task of unravelling the complicated life-cycles of Protozoa, it is of the,greatest importance to distinguish clearly the significance of the various forms that are seen, and there can be no doubt that failure to do so has often been a source of error. With some writers it is an obsession to ascribe all differences to sex, and to interpret, for instance, in the development of trypanosomes, all bulky forms as females, and all slender, active forms as males, quite regardless of the behaviour of the forms thus designated. It is far more probable that in the majority, at least, of such cases the bulky forms are related to the multiplicative, the slender, active forms to the propagative function, respectively, and that the differences between them have no relation whatever to sexual functions, either in the forms themselves or in their descendants. POLYMORPHISM AND LIFE-CYCLES 177 B. LIFE-CYCLES. In the foregoing section the various forms have been described under which one and the same species of Protozoon may occur in the course of its life-history, and in response to the conditions of its particular mode of life. In some species it has been seen that the changes of form and structure are so slight that the species are practically monomorphic, in the sense that they can be identified without difficulty in any active phase of life ; no species is absolutely monomorphic, since, in addition to resting states, differences in size due to growth, at least, will always be found. Other species, on the other hand, are polymorphic to such an extent that their specific identity in different phases can only be determined by tracing their development in a continuous sequence ; and in extreme cases of polymorphism the life-history becomes a varied pageant of dis- similar forms succeeding each other in more or less regular order, determined largely, if not entirely, by the conditions of the environ- ment. In a former chapter the distinction has been drawn between a developmental cycle, consisting of a recurrent series of different forms, and the complete life-cycle, consisting of the whole series of forms or phases which appear between one act of syngamy and the next. The complete life-cycle may comprise many develop- mental cycles. As a concrete example of a lif e-cycle comprising a great number of different forms, and in which also the development may follow more than one course, the life-cycle of Arcella vulgaris may be selected (Fig. 80). The life-history of this form hae now been made known in detail by the combined labours of many investigators, amongst whom Hertwig (65), Elpatiewsky (144), Swarczewsky (101), and Khainsky (145), must be specially mentioned. The form which may be taken as the starting-point of the life- cycle is a minute, amoeba-like form, with a single nucleus (Fig. 80, A). The amoebula, when set free, feeds, grows, and becomes after a time spherical in form with radiate pseudopodia (Fig. 80, B) ; in this stage it resembles a species of the genus Nudearia. After a time the Nudearia-ioim secretes a shell, and now resembles an example of the genus Pseudochlamys (Fig. 80, C). With further growth, chromidia are given off from the nucleus into the cytoplasm, the nucleus divides into two, and the animal thus assumes gradually the characters of the adult Arcella (Fig. 32 ; Fig. 80, D). It has a chitinous shell, circular in outline, flattened in profile-view, and slightly concave on the under-side, in the centre of which is a large circular aperture through which the pseudopodia stream out. The body -protoplasm contains two nuclei situated approximately at 12 178 THE PROTOZOA FIG. 80. — Combined diagram to show the different methods of reproduction and syngamy in the life-cycle of Arcetta. A — D, The four stages in the ontogeny : A, the amoebula ; B, the Nuclear ia-iorm ; C, the PeeudocMamya-ioTm ; D, the adult Arcetta. D — O, Stages in the vegetative reproduction by fission : E, the protoplasm beginning to stream out of the shell of. the parent-individual ; F, division of the nuclei of the parent, and formation of the shell of the daughter ; G, migration of the daughter-nuclei into the daughter-individual and completion of the division. [Continued at foot of p. 179. POLYMORPHISM AND LIFE-CYCLES 179 the opposite ends of a diameter of the circular body, and an irregular ring of chromidia forming a dense chromidial net. Under certain conditions Arcdla becomes encysted, forming a spherical oyst with a tough impervious membrane within the shell, closing the mouth of it. The adult Arcella reproduces itself by a variety of methods, which, however, may be reduced to two principal types : binary fission, producing daughter-individuals (Arcellce) of approximately equal size ; and gemmation, producing small amcebulae such as have been described above as the starting-point of the ontogeny. The production of the amoebulae may or may not be in relation to syngamy, which, when it occurs, may be of one or the other of two distinct types — karyogamy between amoebulse, or chromidiogamy between adult Arcellce. Binary fission (Fig. 80, D — G) is the ordinary type of reproduction during the " vegetative " life in the summer months, when the animal is actively feeding, growing, and reproducing itself. In the process of binary fission, the two nuclei divide by a form of karyokinesis (Fig. 57, p. 110). A quantity of the body-protoplasm streams out through the mouth of the shell, together with some of the chromidia, and one of the two daughter-nuclei of each pair also passes out of the shell. The daughter-^rceZZa thus formed secretes for itself a new shell, and separates from the parent-individual, which retains the old shell. Thus in binary fission both nuclei and chromidia take part, the former dividing by mitosis, while the latter are subjected to a roughly equal partition. The ordinary binucleate form of Arcella may become multi- FIG. 80 — continued: All the figures below the level of D represent reproduction by gemmation : those to the left are reproductive processes not combined with syngamy ; those on the right show the methods of syngamy. H, Formation of secondary nuclei and buds which are liberated singly from the parent as amcebulao (a.). /, Rapid bud-formation, leading to almost the whole protoplasm of the parent being used up to form them. J, Bud-formation external to the shell ; the protoplasm has streamed out, leaving only a small residual portion, containing the primary nuclei, in the shell ; the extruded protoplasm producing buds with formation of secondary nuclei. K, L, Formation of gametes and karyogamy : K, formation of macratncebic (?);£, formation of micramcebaB ( $ ) ; the gametes ( ? and ways — by processes of oxidation, 196 THE PROTOZOA or by the splitting up of complex chemical substances ; the result in either case is the production of energy in various forms and of simple chemical substances, such as water and carbon dioxide (compare Barratt, 148). For the processes of oxidation the organism may either absorb free molecular oxygen from its environ- ment, or may produce it by internal molecular changes of substances contained in its own body, as in anaerobic organisms living in a medium in which free oxygen is lacking. Many free-living Protozoa require oxygen, and are visibly and rapidly affected by the lack of it, especially in their powers of movement. No special organs of respiration are found in any Protozoa, being unnecessary in animals of such small bulk, and in which, consequently, the surface of the body is considerable in proportion to the mass. The contractile vacuoles, when present, are doubtless a means of eliminating carbon dioxide, together with other waste products, from the body. It must be supposed, there- fore, that as a general rule oxygen is taken up from the surrounding water by the protoplasm, of which the limiting membranes are freely permeable, and that the carbon dioxide is given off in a similar manner. The experiments of Verworn (211) on Spirostomum show that the respiratory processes take place in the cytoplasm, independently of the nucleus, which takes no share in respiration. On the other hand, many sapropelic (p. 14) and parasitic forms inhabit media lacking in free oxygen, and are anaerobic ; in such forms the respiratory processes of the protoplasm can only take place by intramolecular changes, in which the stored-up reserve-materials are probably split up to supply the required oxygen. The experiments of Putter (201) on a number of species of Ciliata, both free -living and parasitic, showed that, when these animals were placed in an anaerobic environment, different individuals of the same species reacted very differently to the conditions, some dying very rapidly, others being quite unaffected for a long time. It was shown further that this difference was related to the amount of reserve -materials present in the body (proteins and glycogen), which can be observed to vary greatly in different individuals from the same culture. If Paramecia were first starved for some days and then placed in anaerobic conditions, they succumbed much more rapidly than normal individuals. Moreover, under anaerobic conditions the reserve- materials were used up much* more rapidly than under normal conditions, and without resulting in increased production of energy. Opalina, when placed in a culture-medium to which albumen was added by boiling up dried white of egg in salt-solution, was able to make use of the energy of the albumen without the help of free oxygen, and so to live for a much longer time. The ciliates were found to succumb much more rapidly to the effects of anaerobic conditions in smaller than in larger quantities of water, as the result of auto- intoxication in consequence of the defective excretion of the products of anaerobic metabolism. Spirostomum was found to be more affected by anaerobic conditions in small quantities of water than Paramecium. The differences between the two forms is to bo ascribed to the system of the contractile vacuoles, which is far more efficient in Paramecium than in Spirostomum ; the contractile vacuoles tend to remove from the body the THE GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY OF THE PROTOZOA 197 products of metabolism, a primary necessity of anaerobic life. The question of size is also a factor, since deleterious substances may diffuse from the surface of the body, and in a small body the surface is greater in proportion than in a larger one. Consequently the conditions are more favourable for a smaller species, such as Paramecium, than for a large form, such as Spirostomum. Excess of oxygen was found by Putter (198) to have an injurious effect on Spirostomum, affecting, however, only the cytoplasm, and not the nucleus, in the first instance. On the current view that the symbiotic vegetable organisms present in many Protozoa aid in the respiratory processes by absorbing the carbon dioxide, breaking it up, and setting free the oxygen, the experiments of Lipska (173) on a culture of Paramecia which contained green algae (Proto- coccaceae) in their endoplasm are of considerable interest. In two glass- vessels of equal size there were placed, in the one Paramecia with, in the other without, the algae in their body. Hydrogen was circulated through the vessels to drive out the air, after which they were hermetically sealed and exposed to the same conditions of light and temperature. After fifty hours tLe vessels were opened. The Paramecia without algae were dead, but those containing algae were still alive, though feeble in their movements, and they revived completely in about twenty-four hours after air had access to them. In another experiment two batches of Paramecia were kept in the dark ; after eight days those without algae were dead, while those containing algae were perfectly normal. Old cultures of Paramecia containing algae showed no conjugation ; Lipska explains this as due to the influence of the algae, since, by setting free oxygen, they prevent the development of anaerobic bacteria which produce substances toxic -to the Infusoria. According to Popoff (185), the depression- periods of Protozoa (p. 208) are partly due to derangements of the respiratory processes and to accumulation of products of metabolism in the cell. 3. Excretion and Secretion. — The waste substances excreted from the protoplasm may be either soluble or insoluble in nature. If soluble, they may either pass out of the protoplasmic body by diffusion from the surface, or may be removed by the agency of the contractile vacuoles. Contractile vacuoles are of common occurrence in free-living fresh-water Protozoa, but are usually wanting in marine forms, or, if they occur in them, they pulsate very slowly. They are generally absent also in entozoic and parasitic Protozoa, but are found, however, in some internal parasites — for example, in all Anoplophryince (p. 452 ; Cep6de, 831). Some authors (e.g., Degen, 154) have described an investing membrane to the contractile vacuole, but it is practically certain that no such membrane exists, and that the vacuole is simply a drop of watery fluid lodged in, and bounded by, the more viscid protoplasm, without any special structural differentiation (compare Khainsky, 170'5). The contractile vacuoles were believed at one time to empty themselves internally, and to function simply as circulatory organs ; but in all cases in which they have been studied care- fully, it has been proved that they empty themselves to the exterior (compare Jennings, 167, Khainsky, 170'5). The effect of changes of temperature is noted below (p. 206). Increased pressure makes the pulse slower (Khainsky, 170'5). Degen (154), experi- menting with Glaucoma colpidium, found that oxygen produced at first an increase in the frequency of the pulse, which soon became normal again. Hydrogen and carbon .dioxide diminished the frequency and caused a dilata- tion of the vacuole ; both these gases were lethal in their effect, especially carbon dioxide. Isotonic solutions of neutral salts had a retarding effect. 198 THE PROTOZOA Substances that precipitate albumens have a retarding effect combined with dilatation of the vacuole. Degen, following Hartog, regards the vacuole as primarily a mode of compensation for the tendency of the protoplasm to take up water by imbibition, a tendency checked or inhibited by changes in the tonicity of the medium. Thus Zuelzer (222) found that Amoeba verrucosa, if transferred gradually from fresh water to sea- water, lost its contractile vacuoles ; at the same time its protoplasm shrank and altered in character, and the nucleus acquired a different structure and appearance. When re- stored to fresh water, the contractile vacuoles reappeared, and the nucleus and cytoplasm became of normal character. These experiments indicate that the formation of the contractile vacuoles depends on differences in the tonicity of the protoplasm and the surrounding medium ; they also raise the suspicion that many species of marine Protozoa may be only different forms, due to change of medium, of fresh- water species, or vice versa. For the excretory vacuole-system of Opalina, see p. 447. Insoluble excretion-masses are often formed in great quantity in the bodies of Protozoa. Such substances take the form of crystals or grains of various kinds, and often of pigment. An example of such a substance is the melanin-pigment of the haemamcebse (p. 359), which appears to be a derivative of the haemoglobin of the infected blood-corpuscle. Pigment may arise also by degeneration of superfluous chromatin extruded from the nucleus, as in Actino- sphcerium (p. 209), or by degeneration of nuclei, as in abnormal oocysts of Cyclospora caryolytica (p. 364). The cytoplasm of Paramecium contains crystals which have been studied by Schewiakoff (206), who finds that they consist of calcium phosphate, either Ca3(P04)2 or Ca2H2(P04)2. When the Paramecia were starved, the crystals disappeared completely in one or two days ; if then the Paramecia were supplied with food again, the crystals reappeared. Schewiakoff was never able to observe that the crystals were ejected from the anus, but they were seen to collect round the contractile vacuole. He is of opinion that the insoluble phosphate is dissolved in the enchylema, or is converted into the soluble form CaH4(P04)2, and then eliminated by the contractile vacuole. Insoluble excretion-masses may be simply extruded from the body, a process which commonly takes place at certain crises, as, for example, prior to encystment. Or, on the other hand, they may remain in the protoplasm, and are finally abandoned in the residual masses left over during reproductive phases, as seen com- monly in the sporulation of various types — for example, the haemamcebae already cited and other Sporozoa. In such cases the young individuals are formed" of protoplasm free from the coarse excretion-granules, and the body of the parent, so much as is left of it, dies off and disintegrates. In some cases, however, the young individuals formed contain enclosures derived from the parent-body, as, for example, the crystal-bearing swarm-spores of Radiolaria (p. 254) ; but in such cases the enclosure is probably of the nature of reserve-material. Secretion, more or less rapid, of various substances can be observed without difficulty in various Protozoa. Examples are the THE GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY OF THE PROTOZOA 199 spicules and various skeletal structures ; the shells, houses, etc. adhesive substances or stalks in sedentary forms, as, for example, the non-contractile stalks of many Vorticellids (p. 441) ; and the cysts or envelopes secreted round the body, such as the sporocysts, etc. The pseudopodia of many Amosbaea, such as Difflugia, are covered by a sticky slime which enables the animal to adhere to surfaces over which it creeps, and which can be drawn out by contact with a glass rod into threads, like the mucus of a snail (Rhumbler, 34). In Foraminifera and Heliozoa the pseudopodia appear to secrete a substance which holds the prey fast, and at the same time kills it, as already mentioned. Some Protozoa — for example, gregarines — leave a trail of mucilaginous substance behind them as they move forwards, and by some authors this sesretion has been regarded as the mechanism by which locomotion is effected (p. 327). Internal secretions in connection with the digestive function have been mentioned in a previous section. Arcella has the power of secreting gas-bubbles in its protoplasm for hydrostatic purposes (compare also the Radiolaria, p. 252). 4. Transformation of Energy — (a) Movement.— The different motile organs of Protozoa have been described above. Considered from a morphological standpoint, the protoplasmic body may exhibit, in the first place, no specially differentiated organs of movement, which then takes the form of currents and displacements in the fluid protoplasm itself, manifested externally in the form of pseudopodial processes or flowing movements of the entire body, internally as streaming movements in the protoplasm. Secondly, there may be special organs of movement, either external, in the form of vibratile organs, such as cilia, flagella, or undulating membranes ; or internal, in the form of contractile fibrils or myonemes. Different as pseudopodia may appear at first sight from vibratile organs, such as cilia or flagella, there is nevertheless a very gradual transition from the one type to the other (see p. 53, supra). Of pseudopodia there are two chief types of structure — the lobopodia, in which a fluid core of endoplasm is enveloped by a superficial layer of stiffer ectoplasm ; and the axopodia, in which, on the contrary, a secreted axis of rigid or elastic nature is covered by a more fluid layer of protoplasm. The axopodia are connected by transitions both of structure and movement with organs of the vibratile type. In both flagella and cilia the structure consists of a firmer elastic axis covered over by a more fluid superficial layer (pp. 52, 54) ; many axopodia exhibit swinging, nutating, or bending movements differ- ing only in degree from those of flagella (p. 51). There are grounds for believing the one type of organ to have been derived phylo- genetically from the other. The streaming movements of protoplasm have been the subject 200 THE PROTOZOA of much investigation and discussion. The older view, which ascribed them to contractility and assumed a complicated structure in the protoplasm, has now been superseded generally by the theory connected more especially with the names of Quincke, Berthold, Butschli (37), and Rhumbler (34, 35, 40, etc.), according to which differences of surface-tension are regarded as the efficient cause of the streaming movements of the pseudopodia and the protoplasm. The living substance is in a state of continual chemical change in every part ; such .changes are sufficient to account, in one way or another, for the origin of local differences in the physical nature (adhesion) of the surface of the body in contact with the surrounding medium, or of internal protoplasmic surfaces in contact with vacuoles or cavities filled with fluid ; and the resulting differences in surface-tension cause flowing movements both in the protoplasm and in the fluid with which it is in contact. The relation of such currents to the movements of pseudopodia has been discussed above (p. 47). Similar movements have been imitated artificially by Butschli and Rhumbler in a manner which can leave no doubt that the physical analogy is a reasonable interpretation of the mechanism of amoeboid movement. The close structural similarity between flagella and cilia on the one hand, and the axopodia on the other, makes It highly probable, to say the least, that the same explanation of the movement applies to both. The axis of the vibratile organ is commonly regarded as a firm, elastic, form-determining structure ; the more fluid sheath as the seat of the motile activity. Chemical differences set up in the limiting membrane, causing differences in the surface-tension of the sheath along certain lines, have been supposed to be responsible for a deformation of the sheath, bending the axis and the whole organ with it ; with equalization and disappearance of such differ- ences, the elastic axis straightens itself again. How such chemical differences are set up remains to be explained ; possibly they origi- nate in chemical changes taking place explosively in the basal apparatus of the vibratile organs ; in any case it is plear that, as com- pared with pseudopodia, they act with extreme rapidity, and, further, that they are localized on the surface of the flagellum or cilium. From the movements of these organs, the contraction appears to run a spiral course as a general rule — at least in cilia (p. 54) ; flagella, however, appear to be capable of various kinds of movements (p. 52). According to Prowazek (192), the flagellum of a trypanosome only retains its motility so long as it remains in connection with the kinetonucleus. Wer- bitzki (526), however, has succeeded in producing strains of trypanosomes without kinetonuclei, and with apparently no resulting loss of motility. It has been observed frequently that detached cilia or flagella continue to contract, for a time at least ; and Schuberg (44) denies that the basal granules of the cilia function as centres of kinetic activity. With regard to the contractility of the myunemes, no detailed explanation can be offered at present. Biitschli (37) has shown the possibility of explaining the contractile mechanism of such structures by differences in surface-tension arising between the walls and the contents of protoplasmic alveoli which are disposed with a definite arrangement. (b) Other Forms of Energy. — Light-production or phosphorescence is a common phenomenon in marine Protozoa, a property expressed in such names as Noctiluca (p. 279) and Pyrodinium (p. 278). The magnificent phosphorescent effects often seen at night, especially in warmer seas, is to be referred chiefly to swarms of Protozoa. The source of the luminosity appears to reside in small globules of fat or oil, and is probably the result of oxidation. It is easy to observe that the production of light is stimulated by agitating or stirring the water. For a general discussion of luminosity in living organisms, see Putter (200). From the analogy of the known facts in the physiology of animal and plants, it may be inferred that in Protozoa also the vital activities are accompanied by the production of heat and by electrical changes ; but no exact determinations of such changes have been ma"de. 5. Reactions to Stimuli and Environment. — It can easily be observed that Protozqa react in a definite manner to stimuli, and behave in a particular way under certain conditions. In most cases, however, these responses to external conditions must be regarded as fundamental properties of the living protoplasm, and hot as functions of specially differentiated organs of the body. This is well seen, for example, in amoebae, some species of which are very sensitive to light, and cease feeding when exposed to the bright illumination of the stage of the microscope (Rhumbler, 34). In Arcetta the nuclear division is stated to take place only at night, between 1 and 5 a.m. (Khainsky, 145). In such cases, however, there is nothing which can be identified as a special light-perceiving organ. In other cases Protozoa may possess organs which must be regarded as sensory in nature. Pseudopodia appear to possess in many cases a tactile or sensory function to a marked degree, and sometimes to be specialized for such rfunctions, as, for example, the anterior pseudopodia of some Myxosporidia, such as Leptotheca agilis (Fig. 165). The same is true to a much greater degree of flagella and cilia ; anteriorly-directed flagella are perhaps always sensory in function, especially when they are not the sole means of locomotion, as in such forms as Rhizomastigina (p. 268) or Bodonidce (p. 270) ; and in many Ciliata stiff tactile bristles occur (p. 446). In many flagellates organs are found which appear to be specially sensitive to light, in the form of pigment-spots or stigmata, which are described further below. 202 THE PROTOZOA The occurrence of a conducting nervous apparatus is more doubtful ; it has been affirmed for Stentor by Neresheimer (p. 446), but is not confirmed by other observers. It can at least be asserted that in the more highly organized Ciliata a stimulus may lead to sudden movements in which different sets of contractile structures take a concerted part. The reactions of Protozoa to stimuli have been the subject of a great deal of experimental research by many investigators, amongst whom Verworn, Loeb, Jennings (165), and Piitter (199), deservf* special mention. The results of these investigations can only be summarized briefly here. The various reactions are classified in the first instance, according to the nature of the stimulus, by the use of a terminology in which each principal category is denoted by a word terminating in taxis, or in adjectival form — tactic. Thus we can distinguish — (a) Chemotaxis, or reactions to chemical stimuli ; (6) Phototaxis, or reactions to light ; (c) Thermotaxis, or reactions to heat or cold ; (d) Barotaxis, or reactions to mechanical stimuli ; and (e) Galvanotaxis, or reactions to electrical stimuli. A given Protozoon may be quite unaffected by a particular stimulus ; or, on the other hand, it may be affected by it in such a way that it tends to move towards the source of the stimulus (positive taxis) or away from it (negative taxis). The result depends, in many cases, on the intensity of the stimulus applied ; thus, a Euglena, will move towards a moderate light (positive phototaxis), but away from a too intense illumination (negative phototaxis). In each case an optimum condition exists, in which the positive taxis reaches its maximum. In such experiments the Ciliata are the objects of choice, on account of the definite polarity of their movements as compared with forms less highly organized, such as amoeba. In the Ciliata a negative taxis results in an " avoiding reaction " (Schreck- bewegung), in which the animal shrinks .back with reversal of the ciliary movements, " turning towards a structurally-defined side, followed by a movement forward " (Jennings). Repeated experi- ments have shown that the forms taken by the avoiding movements do not depend on the nature of the stimulus, but on the organization of the animal itself, and are always the same for a given species. An Oxytricha, for example, turns always to the right, whatever the direction from which the stimulus comes. The movement is deter- mined automatically by the structure of the body. " The same symptom can be called forth by the most diverse stimuli " (Piitter, 199). The various taxes may now be considered briefly : (a) Chemotaxis and Effects of Environment. — This category in- cludes reactions to liquids or gases diffused in the water ; reactions THE GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY OF THE PROTOZOA 203 to gases may be considered as equivalent to a sense of smell in higher organisms (osmotaxis). It has been shown by many experiments that a given species is attracted towards certain chemical substances, repelled by others. Thus, Paramecium is attracted towards weak acids, but repelled by them in greater concentration. If a drop of acid of suitable strength is placed in the midst of a number of Paramecia distributed evenly in the» water under a cover-slip on a slide, they tend to gather round the drop. As the drop diffuses in the surrounding water, the Paramecia arrange themselves in a ring in the region of optimum concentration. If, however, the drop of fluid employed is of a strength which represents the optimum of chemotaxis for the species, FIG. 83. — Diagram showing the course taken by a Paramecium which has entered a drop of fluid to which it is positively chemotactic. The forward movements of the Paramecium are indicated by arrows ; its backward movements by dotted lines ; the outline of the drop of fluid by a circle. Each time the Paramecium, in its forward movement, reaches the confines of the drop, it conies into contact with fluid which is less positively chemotactic than the drop into which it has entered ; it then shrinks backward (avoiding reaction), after which it moves forward again with the same result every time it reaches the edge of the drop. After Lang (10). the Paramecia gather within it, and in such a case the position taken up by each Paramecium depends on the avoiding reaction made by it when it comes in contact with a less attractive medium. Thus, if a Paramecium, swimming in a straight line, enters a drop of fluid which is positively chemotactic to it, when it has crossed the drop to its opposite boundary it comes to the region where it meets with fluid which is less chemotactic to it ; it then shrinks back with an avoiding movement ; after a time it again moves forward, and comes again into the negatively chemotactic region, with the same result as before. Thus its movements are as if caught in a trap (Fig. 83), in which it is held by the automatic movements called forth by the difference between the more and the less chemotactic fluids, unt'l 204 THE PROTOZOA the differences slowly disappear by the diffusion of the one liquid into the other. Chemotaxis is a phenomenon which is obviously of the greatest importance in the natural life of the organism. It comes into play in the search for food and in sexual attraction, for example. It has long been known that certain Protozoa are attracted towards food- substances, especially those species which feed more or less exclusively upon certain particular foods. Plasmodia of Mycetozoa, for example, "scent" their food from a considerable distance, and move towards it. Rhumbler (34, 204) has studied the ingestion of food by amoebae, and has made a number of experiments on the manner in which drops of fluid take up or cast out solid particles. Thus, r drop of chloroform suspended in water draws into its interior a glass splinter coated with shellac when brought into contact with it ; after a time the coating of shellac is dissolved in the chloro- form, and the glass splinter is then ejected from the drop. This experiment furnishes data for a mechanical explanation of the ingestion of food and ejection of faecal matter ; and it might be expected that amoebae in Nature would ingest mechanically, and as it were helplessly, many substances of a useless kind with which they are brought into contact. This may occur experimentally when amoebae are brought into contact with substances of no nutritive value ; Rhumbler observed an amoeba which ingested carmine- particles until it died. In Nature, however, there can be no doubt that amoebae exercise a certain choice or selection in the food they ingest, doubtless as the effect of rhemotactic reactions (compare Jennings, 168). In the Ciliata, however, tnere appears to be no selection of the food- particles wafted down the oesophagus except as regards their size (compare Greenwood, 162). Purely mechanical reactions, on the other hand, may possibly explain the apparent selection which many Protozoa exhibit in building up houses of cer- tain special materials (p. 34). Chemotactic reactions to particular substances must play a large part in determining the migrations of certain parasitic Protozoa towards particular organs of the body in which they are parasitic, in so far as such migrations are not purely passive on the part of the parasite, or determined to some extent by rheotaxis (see below). The attraction of gametes to one another can hardly be effected by any- thing but chemotaxis. It is well known that the antherozoids of the fern- prothallus are positively chemotactic to malic acid, which is secreted by the oogonium. In Coccidium schuberyi, Schaudinn (99) observed that the macro- gamete, as- soon as it had expelled its karyosome, but not before, became attractive to the microgamete. The effects of drugs and reagents on the activities of the Protozoa is a field of investigation which cannot be dealt with in detail here. Some reagents have a quickening effect on the movements, others the contrary. Narcotics, on the other hand, such as alcohol, ether, etc,, may at first have a stimulating, later a deleterious, action on the vital activity. Minute doses of alcohol, according to Woodruff (216), diminish the rate of division at one period, augment it at another, of the life-cycle, but in the latter case the rate is not continuous, but decreases again ; increase in the amount of alcohol will, however, again cause a more rapid cell-division for a limited period Thyroid extract is stated to have an attractive effect on Paramecium, and also increases its capacity for reproduction (Nowikoff, 183). For the effects of other drugs and poisons, see Giemsa and Prowazek (159), and Prowazek (191, 192, and 195). In the same culture different individuals often exhibit different powers of resistance to the effects of reagents. THE GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY OF THE PROTOZOA 205 (6) Phototaxis and Effects of Light and Other Rays. — Many Pro- tozoa appear quite indifferent to light — at least of ordinary intensity ; others show a very decided reaction, as already mentioned, either negative or positive. Thus many amoebae, Pelomyxa, etc., are negatively phototactic, and pass at once into a condition of rest and inactivity when exposed to light. According to Mast (176), a sudden increase in the intensity of the illumination inhibits move- ment in Amoeba proteus; but if the illumination remains constant, movement begins again in a few moments. If the illumination is very gradually in- creased, it produces no response. In strong light Amoeba proteus orientates itself, producing pseudopodia only on the less illuminated side. Many flagellates, on the other hand, especially the holophytic forms such as Dinoflagellates, Phytomastigina, Eugle- noids, etc., show the- opposite reaction, moving towards the light or becoming active when exposed to it,vand passing into a resting state in the dark. The positive phototaxis of the holophytic Protozoa has an obvious bionomical sig- nificance, since the holophytic nutrition can only proceed in the presence of light. a. 84. — A, Anterior end of Euglena viridis. ft., Flagel- lum ; ). After a time the colony breaks up, the daughter-individuals separate,, and each one fixes itself and grows into the adult Wagneretta-fona.. Bud-formation in Wagnerella (Fig. 102, A — C) is initiated by division of the karyosome within the nucleus, which retains its position in the base. The process is repeated until the nucleus contains a number of karyosomes, each with a centriole. The nucleus then buds off one or more small daughter- nuclei, each containing a single karyosome. Sometimes the nucleus breaks up entirely into as many daughter-nuclei as there are karyosomes, in which case the parent-individual dies off, in a manner similar to Arcdla (p. 180), after liberation of the buds. Each daughter-nucleus migrates up the stalk into the head, where it becomes surrounded by a layer of protoplasm to form the bud, which is set free at first as an amoeboid body. Before or after being set free, the bud may multiply by binary fission with mitosis, in which the centriole in the karyosome acts as a centrosome. Finally each amoeboid body develops into a Wagnerdla, and in the process the centriole passes out of the nucleus and becomes the central grain, while the nucleus becomes displaced from the centre. In the process of gemmation the central grain of the parent -individual takes no share whatever. In the formation of the swarm-spores, minute secondary nuclei arise from chromidia near the principal nucleus in the base. Each secondary nucleus forms a centriole and divides by mitosis ; the division is repeated until the whole body, stalk and head as well as base, is filled with small nuclei, while the primary nucleus degenerates. The body then divides up into as many cells as there are secondary nuclei, each cell becoming a biflagellate swarm- spore which is set free, while the parent-individual degenerates. The destiny of the swarm-spores is uncertain, but they are believed to be gametes. THE SARCODINA 247 In the " schizogony " of the stout forms the nucleus breaks up into a number of daughter-nuclei, as in gemmation ; each daughter-nucleus grows, its karyo- some multiplies by fission, and it breaks up in its turn into granddaughter- nuclei. Continued multiplication of the nuclei in this manner proceeds until the body is filled with vesicular nuclei ; it then breaks up into as many amcebulae, which are set free, leaving a residual body with the central grain, which degenerates. Fia. 102. — WagnereUa borealis, showing budding and fission. A, Specimen with a single bud (b) : e.g., central grain ; B, specimen with four buds (6) ; 0, en- larged view of the head of a specimen containing two buds (b) in process of extrusion ; D, specimen in which the head has multiplied by fission to produce a Rhaphidiophrys-like colony ; six individuals are seen, five of them each with nucleus and central grain, the sixth in process of fission, with two nuclei and two central grains. After Zuelzer (86). The Heliozoa are classified into four suborders : SUBORDER I. : APHROTHORACA. — Body naked in the active state ; envelopes, sometimes with siliceous spicules, only formed during 248 THE PROTOZOA encystment. Examples : Actinophrys (Fig. 46), Actinosphcerium (Fig. 3), Camptanema (Fig. 47), etc. SUBORDER II. : CHLAMYDOPHOBA. — Body protected by a soft gela- tinous envelope, but without solid skeletal elements. Example : Astrodisculus. SUBORDER III. : CHALAROTHORACA. — Body invested by a soft envelope containing isolated spicules, usually siliceous, sometimes chitinous. Examples : Acanthocystis (Figs. 18, 64, 68), Wagneretta (Figs. 48, 102), Heterophrys (Fig. 103). SUBORDER IV. : DESMOTHORACA. — Body invested by a continuous, lattice-like skeleton. Example : Clathrulina (Fig. 19). — c. ^10. 103. — Heterophrys fockei , Archer, c., c., Contractile vacuoles ; «., radial chiti- nous spines surrounding the envelope. A nucleus is present in the body, but is not shown ; the bodies in the protoplasm represent zooxanthellae. From Weldon and Hickson, after Hertwig and Lesser. A certain number of genera must be mentioned which are of doubtful position, referred by some authorities to the Heliozoa, by others to other orders. Some of these genera perhaps do not represent independent, " adult " forma, but may be only developmental phases of other genera. Nudearia, classed by some in the Aphrothoraca, by others in the Proteomyxa, has an amoeboid body and pseudopodia without axes. As described above (p. 177 and Pig. 80), a Nuclearia-stage occurs in the development of Arcetta. Especially remarkable are certain genera which indicate a close relation- ship between Heliozoa and Flagellata. An account of several such forms is given by Penard (302), in addition to which the following may be noted : Cttiophrya, Cienkowski, has two phases ; in the one it appears as a typical Heliozoon with stiff radiating pseudopodia; in the other it is a .typical flagellate. In the process of transformation the Heliozoon-form retracts its pseudopodia, its body becomes amoeboid, and a flagellum grows out ; finally THE SARCODINA 249 the animal becomes a pear-shaped flagellate swimming by means of its flagellum (Schewiakoff, 863 ; Caullery, 300). Ciliophrys thus recalls Pseudo- spora in its two pnases (p. 218), and there can be little doubt that the two forms are closely allied. Dimorpha nutans, Gruber(Fig. 104), has radiating pseudopodia strengthened by axial rods, and in addition a pair of flagella arising close together at one pole of the body. Both flagella and pseudopodia arise from a centrosome situated near the flagellated pole ; the single nucleus is also excentric and placed close beside the centrosome. The animal uses one of its flagella for attach- ment, while the other remains free (Schouteden). These facts appear to indicate an origin for the Heliozoa from Flagellates such as those of the genus Midticilia (p. 270, Fig. 113), in which the body bears radiating flagella planted evenly over the surface ; transformation of the flagella into stiff pseudopodia would produce the Heliozoon - type of organism. On such a view two peculiarities of the Heliozoan pseudopodia receive explanation : the power of nutation and bending which they fro- Fio. 104. — Dimorpha nutans. After Schouteden. quently possess ; and their insertion on a " central grain," which would then represent the blepharoplast, pure and simple, of a flagellate. On this view the pseudopodia of the Heliozoa would appear to be structures quite different in nature from the similarly-named organs of Lobosa. On the other hand the Heliozoa also show affinities towards forms classed among the Reticulosa or " Proteomyxa," as already noted in the case of Ciliophrys and Pseudospora. Przesmycki has described a species, Endophrys rotatorium, parasitic in Rotifers, which he considers as a connecting-link between Nuclearia and Vampyretta. The exact systematic position of such genera must be considered at present an open question. VI. BADIOLABIA. General Characters. — The Radiolaria are characterized, speaking generally, by the same type of form and symmetry that is so marked a feature of the Heliozoa, though in many cases the internal 260 THE PROTOZOA structure of the body, and especially the skeleton, may depart more or less widely from the radiate symmetry which is to be regarded, probably, as primitive for the group. Hence three principal types of symmetry can be distinguished in these organisms : (1) Homaxon (Figs. 13, 105, 107), in which all axes passing through the centre are morphologically equivalent, the symmetry of the sphere ; (2) monaxon (Fig. 109), in which the body has a principal or vertical axis round which it is radially symmetrical, the type of symmetry of the cone ; (3) bilaterally symmetrical (Fig. 106), in which the body Fio. 105. — Acanthometra elastica, Haeckel. sp., Radiating spines of the skeleton (twenty in number, but only twelve are seen in the figure) ; ps., pseudopodis ; c., calymma ; c.c., central capsule ; N , N., nuclei ; x, yellow cells ; my,, myo- phrisks. After Biitsohli, Leuckart and Nitsche's " Zoologisohe Wandtafeln." can be divided along a principal plane into equivalent right and left halves. With further modification the body may become asymmetrical. Sedentary forms are not known in this group, the species of which are exclusively marine, and occur on the open surfaces of seas and oceans, reaching in many instances a re atively large size and a very high degree of structural differentiation. In the internal structure, the most salient feature is the division of the body by means of a membranous structure, termed the central capsule (Fig. 13, CK ), into a central medullary region and a peripheral cortical zone — hence distinguished as the intracapsular THE SARCODINA 261 and extracapsular regions of the body. The intracapsular medulla contains the nucleus or nuclei, and is the seat of reproductive processes. The extracapsular cortex is the seat of assimilation, excretion, food-capture, and of such locomotor processes as these organisms are able to perform, consisting chiefly of rising or sinking in the water by means of changes in a hydrostatic apparatus presently to be described. The Radiolaria are an exceedingly abundant group represented by a great number of species both at the present time and in past ages ; over vast tracts of the ocean- floor their skeletons are the principal, almost the gole constituents of the ooze ; and the same must have been true in past times, since in many geological deposits the rocks are composed of the same materials. Every microscopist is familiar with their skeletons, which on account of their beauty and variety of form are favourite objects for microscopic study and demonstration. Corresponding with the variety of forms and species, the internal structure shows a range of variation and differentiation which it is impossible to deal with adequately in a short space ; it must suffice, therefore, to describe here the main structural peculiarities of this group in a general manner, and to indicate briefly the principal variations of structure which are of importance for the classification of the group For further information the reader must be referred to the larger treatises and special monographs. Structure. — Tne central capsule, absent in rare cases, may be a thin, delicate structure, visible only after treatment with reagents, or may be fairly thick. In homaxon forms it is generally spherical, but may assume various shapes correlated with the general body- form, and even may be lobed or branched. It is perforated by openings which place the intracapsular protoplasm in communica- tion with the extracapsular ; the openings may take the form of fine pores scattered evenly over the whole surface (Peripylaria) ; of similar pores aggregated into localized patches, pore-areas or pore- plates (Acantharia) ; of a single pore-plate at one pole of an asym- metrical capsule (Monopylaria, Fig. 106) ; or of one principal and two lateral apertures (Tripylaria). The intracapsular protoplasm contains the nuclear apparatus, either one nucleus of very large size or a number of smaller nuclei (Fig. 105). In addition, various bodies of metaplastic nature, serving as reserve-material for the reproductive processes, are found in this region, in the form of fat-globules, oil-drops, concre- tions, crystals, etc. The extracapsular region consists of three zones, from within outwards : (1) an assimilative layer or matrix immediately sur- rounding the capsule ; (2) a vacuolated layer, known as the "cal- ymma," hydrostatic 'in function; (3) a protoplasmic layer from which the pseudopodia arise. 1. The assimilative layer contains pigment, representing ex- cretory substances and ingested food-material in the shape of small 252 THE PROTOZOA organisms captured by the pseudopodia and passed into the body, to be digested in this region. In the Tripylaria an aggregation of food-material and excretory substances produces a characteristic greenish or brownish mass concentrated round the main aperture of the central capsule, and known as the phceodium, whence this suborder is sometimes known as the Phaeodaria. 2. The calymma is composed for the most part of a great number of vacuoles containing fluid, the function of which is hydrostatic ; the contents of the vacuoles are stated to be water saturated with carbon dioxide, causing the animal to float at the surface, and enabling it to regulate its position in relation to conditions of environ- ment. In rough weather the vacuoles burst or are expelled from the body, and the animal sinks into deeper and quieter layers of water; there fresh vacuoles are formed, enabling it to return again to the surface if the conditions are favourable. Contractile vacuoles of the ordinary type are not present. In addition to the vacuoles, the calymma contains numerous " yellow cells," generally regarded as sym- biotic organisms of vegetable nature, and named " zooxanthellaa " or zoochlorellae," according to their FIG. 106. — Lithocircus productus, Hertwig, showing a bilaterally symmetrical skeleton consisting of a simple siliceous ring pro- colour. Absent in the Tripylaria, longed into spicular processes, these yellow cells are found, as a sk., Skeleton ; ex., central cap- , , . , sule ; pf., pore-area, surmounted mle> m tne calymma, but m by a conical structure (c.), the Acantharia they occur in the intra- #~Ca nucleusT 0!!° otl-gtobule! capsular protoplasm (Fig. 105, x). After Biitschli, Leuckart and The nature of the yellow cells of " Zoologische Wand. Acantharia has been much disputed, and many observers have regarded them as an integral part of the organism itself ; this view has recently been revived by Moroff and Stiasny, who bring forward evidence to prove that the yellow cells of Acantharia are a developmental phase of the organism. Still more recently this view has been extended by Stiasny to the colony-forming Sphaerozoa in the first place, and then to Radiolaria generally. The difficulty in the way of such an interpretation which arises frojn the co-existence, in %halassicolla and other genera, of yellow cells in the calymma, with an undivided nucleus in the host- organism, is met by supposing - that in such cases developmental THE SARCODINA 253 stages of other Radiolarians have penetrated into the calymma, and live there symbiotically — a supposition which is certainly in need of further proof bsfore it can be accepted. 3. The most external layer of the body is a protoplasmic envelope from which the pseudopodia radiate. In Radiolaria, speaking generally, the pseudopodia are straight, slender, and filamentous, composed of motile protoplasm entirely (" myxopodia ") ; but in Acantharia some of the pseudopodia are, like those of Heliozoa, axopodia supported by stiff axial rods of organic substance, which originate deep within the central capsule and pass through the calymma along the axis of the pseudopodium, but without reaching as far as its distal extremity. In some Acantharia (Acanthometrida) are found also peculiar modifications of the bases of certain of the pseudopodia in the form of groups of rod-like bodies, " myonemes " or " myophrisks " (Fig. 105, my.), clustered round each of the spicules of the skeleton. As their name implies, the myonemes are contractile elements which, by their contraction or expansion, alter the hydrostatic balance of the organism, and enable it to rise or sink in the water. According to Moroff and Stiasny, the myonemes are formed in the interior of the central capsule, and are derived from nuclei. In a certain number of Radiolaria a skeleton is absent altogether. The Acantharia have a skeleton composed of a substance which was formerly supposed to be of organic nature, and was termed acanthin by Haeckel, but which consists of strontium sulphate according to Biitschli (310). In other Radiolaria the skeleton, when present, is siliceous. In Acantharia the skeleton invades the intracapsular region, and consists typically of a system of twenty spines or spicules radiating from the centre of the body (Fig. 105). It is a simple and enticing view to regard such a skeleton as origin- ating phylogenetically from a modification of the axis of pseudo- podia. Union of outgrowths from radially-directed spicules gives rise to a lattice-work forming a spherical perforated shell, and as the animal grows in size several such concentric spheres may be formed, one within the other, supported by radial bars which represent the original radiating spicules (Fig. 107). In Radiolaria other than Acantharia the skeleton is usually entirely extracapsular, and exhibits a variety of form and structure which cannot be dis- cussed further here. In some of the Tripylara foreign bodies are utilized for building up the skeleton, either to form the basis of spines secreted by the animal or to construct a coat of armour on the exterior of the body (Borgert). Life-History. — Reproduction of the Radiolaria is effected in some instances by binary fission — namely, in those forms in which a skeleton is lacking or consists of loose spicules. The nucleus 254 THE PROTOZOA divides by a mitosis remarkable for the vast number of chromo- somes, of which there may be over a thousand, and the apparent absence of a centrosome. The more usual method of reproduction, however, is formation of flagellated swarm-spores by a process of rapid multiple fission within the central capsule. Two kinds of swarm-spores are produced, which are known respectively as " isospores " and " anisospores." The isospores (Fig. 108, A), which are probably agametes, are all similar in size and appearance, and frequently contain a crystal in their protoplasm, and are hence sometimes termed " crystal-spores." The anisospores (Fig. 108, cc FIG. 107. — Actinomma asteracanthion : semi-diagrammatic to show the mode of growth of the skeleton. S.1, S.2, S.3, Three concentric lattice-work shells, connected by sp., radial bars which are prolonged beyond the outermost shell as spikes ; N., nucleus ; c.r ., central capsule ; ps., pseudopodia. After Biitschli, Leuekart and Nitsche's " Zoologische Wandtafeln." B, C), probably gametes, are of two kinds, smaller microspores and larger macrospores ; they differ in structure from the isospores, and lack the characteristic crystal. The swarm-spores vary in struc- ture in different species, but usually have two nagella. Isospores and anisospores are formed in different individuals, but it is still a moot point whether an alternation of generations occurs. Micro - spores and macrospores may be formed in the same individual in some species ; in others they are produced by different individuals. Previous to formation of the swarm-spores the extracapsular region of the body disintegrates, and the central capsule with its contents THE SARCODINA 255 sinks to a considerable depth. The swarm-spores are liberated by the breaking-up of the central capsule. The subsequent develop- ment of the swarm-spores when set free has not been made out. While the main features of the reproductive process are as stated above, the cytological details of the formation of the swarm-spores is still a matter of dispute. The subject is dealt with in the recent memoirs of Moroff on the one part, and Hartmann and Hammer, Hartmann (60), and Huth, on the other. The formation of the anisospores is generally regarded as a breaking- up of the primary nucleus into chromidia, from a part of which the secondary nuclei arise, which become those of the swarm-spores (compare Poraminifera). But according to Hartmann and his adherents, the huge primary nuclei seen in many Radiolaria are polyenergid nuclei or polykarya (p. 121) containing a vast number of nuclear energids or monokarya, consisting each of chromatin, in the form of a twisted thread or so-called " chromosome," and a centriole. In the gamete-formation a great number of such monokarya are set free from the primary nucleus to become the gamete-nuclei ; hence the so-called " generative chromidia " set free from the nucleus are interpreted as secondary nuclei or monokarya already formed within the primary nucleus. A similar interpretation is given to the mitosis seen in the process of binary fission ; the huge mitotic figure, composed of more than a thousand chromosomes, is interpreted as being in reality made up of as many mitotic figures as there are chromosomes, since each so-called " chromosome " is regarded'as a single FIG. 108. — Swarm-spores of Cottozoum inerme. A, Crystal-bearing swarm-spores, agametes ; B, G, swarm-spores without crystals, gametes ; B, microspores (microgametes) ; C, macrospores (macrogametes). After Hertwig. nuclear energid or monokaryon with its own centriole, the whole number of energids dividing independently but synchronously to form the supposed mitotic figure. According to Moroff and Stiasny, in Acanthometra pdlucida a process of multiplication is proceeding continually within the central capsule, until it is entirely filled up with cells, from which the swarm-spores arise. In this multiplication, termed by the authors " schizogony," trophic nuclei (" macro- nuclei") and generative nuclei (" micronuclei ") are formed. The trophic nuclei are the " yellow cells," which ultimately degenerate. Hence the Acan- tharia are considered not to be single individuals, but colonies of animals which have the extracapsular protoplasm, pseudopodia and skeleton in common. Finally, attention must be drawn to the peculiar organisms found in certain Badiolaria, and regarded by some authorities as parasitic Flagellata (Silico- flagellata, Borgert), by others as developmental stages, of the Radiolaria themselves. See Delage and Herouard (6, p. 371). The Radiolaria are classified as follows : SUBORDER I. : PERIPYIARIA SETT SPTJMELLARIA. — Central capsule spherical, perforated by evenly- distributed pores. Extracapsular region well developed. Skeleton wanting or consisting of scattered spicules or of lattice-work shells, developed in the extracapsular region, siliceous. Legion 1 : Collodaria.— Skeleton wanting or simple in structure ; monozoic forms. Five families. Examples : Thalassicolla (Fig. 13), Thalassophysa. Legion 2 : Sphcerdlaria. — Skeleton complex, usually with lattice-work «hell ; monozoic, generally small. Four families. 256 THE PROTOZOA Legion 3 : Sphcerozoa seu Polycyttaria. — Colonial forms consisting of numerous individuals embedded in a common jelly ; their central capsules are distinct, but their extracapsular regions anastomose. The colonies reach a length of several centimetres. Two families. Example : Collozoum. SUBORDER II. : ACANTHARIA. — Skeleton composed of strontium sulphate, typically in the form of spicules radiating from the centre of the body, within the central capsule ; in addition lattice-work shells may be developed. Central capsule with pores evenly developed, or grouped in areas. A number of families are recognized, grouped in different ways by different authorities. Example : Acanthometra (Fig. 105). Fia. 109. — Eucyrtidium cranioides, Haeckel : entire animal as seen in the living condition. The central capsule is hidden by the beehive- shaped siliceous shell within which it is lodged. From Gamble, magnified 150. SUBORDER III. : MONOPYIARIA SET; NASSELLARIA. — Central capsule monaxon in form, with the pores aggregated at one pole into a pore-plate, and the walls of the pores thickened to form a conical structure directed inwards into the central capsule. Several families. Examples : Lithocircus (Fig. 106), Eucyrtidium (Fig. 109). SUBORDER IV. : TRIPYLARIA SEU PH^EODARIA. — Central capsule with a principal aperture (astropyle) and two accessory apertures (parapyle). A mass of pigment (phaeodium, p 252) surrounds the principal aperture. Divided by Hacker into six legions and numerous families. Example: Aulacantha. Bibliography. — For references see p. 483. CHAPTER XII SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE PROTOZOA : THE MASTIGOPHORA THE distinctive feature of the class Mastigophora is the possession of one or more flagella as organs of locomotion and food-capture, not merely during early stages of development, but in the active phases of the adult organism also. In other classes, as has been pointed out in a previous chapter, flagella may be present in the young stages, but are absent in the adult phases. In the Masti- gophora a flagellum is a permanent feature of the organization, though even in this class it may be temporarily lost, either in active phases, when the animal may become amoeba-like, or in resting phases, especially in parasitic forms of intracellular habitat. The Mastigophora are divided into three subclasses, of which the first, the Flagellata, contains the more typical forms, and con- stitutes the nucleus, so to speak, of the class ; while the two remain- ing subclasses, the Dinoflagellata and Cystoflagellata, may be regarded as specialized offshoots of the primitive flagellate stem. It is convenient, therefore, to deal with the Flagellata in a general manner first, and then to describe the special features of the other two subclasses. SUBCLASS I. : FLAGELLATA (EUFLAGELLATA). General Characters. — The members of this group are for the most part of minute size, and seldom attain to considerable dimensions ; forms of relatively large size, such as the species of Euglena and allied genera, are small as compared with the larger species of the Sarcodina and other classes. As a rule the Flagellata are free- swimming organisms ; a certain number, however, are sedentary in habit, attaching themselves to a -firm basis, and using their flagella for food-capture alone. There is a great tendency to colony- formation in this group. In the process of multiplication by fission of the ordinary type, separation between the daughter-individuals may be incomplete, so that they remain connected together, either by means of a common envelope, house, or gelatinous matrix, or by organic, protoplasmic union, or in both ways. Repeated fission 257 17 258 THE PROTOZOA of this kind leads to the formation of a colony which may attain to dimensions relatively large, though composed of individuals of minute size. The colony may be free-swimming or fixed, and in the latter case is frequently arborescent in form. In many cases the colonies of Flagellata show a differentiation of the constituent individuals into vegetative and generative individuals — the former not capable of reproduction, but purely trophic in function ; the latter destined to be set free, and to produce new colonies, with or without going through a process of syngamy. Bionomics. — In their modes of life the Flagellata exhibit all the four types described in Chapter II. (p. 13), different forms being holozoic, holophytic, saprophytic, or parasitic ; and one and the same form may live in different ways during different periods of its life-history, according to circumstances. The parasitic flagellates have attracted a great deal of attention of recent years, on account of their importance in causing disease in man and animals. Ectozoic parasites may occur in aquatic forms, as for example Costia, para- sitic on the, skin of fishes. The entozoic forms are parasitic for the most part in the digestive tract, or in the blood and lymph of their hosts. Parasitic flagellates are found in the intestines of practically all classes of the Metazoa, and especially in arthropods and vertebrates ; those parasitic in blood and lymph are found especially in vertebrates, and constitute an important group commonly termed as a whole the H&moflagellates, to which a special chapter will be devoted. From forms which were probably parasitic originally in the blood have arisen secondarily forms parasitic in cells which in their intracellular phase lose their flagellum entirely (Leishmania). Many of the intestinal flagellates, especially in vertebrates, are probably not true parasites at all, but for the most part scavengers. In any case their pathogenic role appears to be very limited ; but in some cases a pathological condition of the host may be combined in a suspicious manner with great numbers of the parasites (compare Bohnc and Frowazek, Noc). It is worthy of note that in some cases an intestinal parasite may pass from the intestine into the blood or lymph under pathological conditions of the host. This condition seems to have been noticed •first by Panilewsky, who described cases of frogs and tortoises which had been kept long in captivity and were in bad condition, thin, and with oedematous swellings in the muscles and transudation of lymph into the peritoneal cavity ; in such animals there were found in the blood and lymph, especially in the oedemata and trans- udations, abundant flagellates of the genus Hexajnitus ( —Octomitus, Fig. 116), of a species which in normal, healthy animals is found only in the intestine. A number of similar cases have been recorded by Plimmer (383, and Presi- dential Address to the Royal Microscopical Society, 1912), who found both Octomitus and Trichomonas in the blood of various batrachia and reptiles. The conditions under which these intestinal parasites pass into the blood appears to be strictly comparable to those under which the Leydenia-iorm. of Chlamydophry* passes into the ascitic fluid (p. 237). Whether In such oases the migration of the parasite is the cause of the diseased state of the host, or whether, as seems more likely, the abnormal condition of the host gives the parasite an opportunity of spreading into fresh pastures, must remain for the present an open question ; but, according to Plimmer, the presence of intestinal flagellates in the blood-circulation is associated with definite and recognizable lesions of the intestinal wall. In any case, the fact that intestinal flagellates can pass into the blood is a point which is prpbably of phylogenetic as well as of practical importance (p. 322). THE MASTIGOPHORA 259 Structure. — The body-form is of three principal types : (1) An envelope or tough cortex may be entirely absent, and the body is then amoeboid, as hi the Rhizomastigina (Figs. 38, 40) ; (2) a thin cuticle may be present, insufficiently rigid to inhibit changes of body-form due to contractility of the living substance (Fig. 15) ; (3) a thicker cuticle necessitates a constant body-form, which is either rigid and unalterable or sinuous and permitting movements of flexion and torsion. In the second type are comprised forms termed commonly " metabolic," on account of the changes of form they exhibit ; contractions of the superficial layer of the body pass, as it were, in waves from the anterior to the posterior end of the body, in a manner similar to the peristaltic contractions of the intestine, producing rhythmic form-changes in the body. In species in which the cuticle is thin or absent, a constant body- form may nevertheless be maintained by internal form-giving organs, such as the axostyle of Trichomonas (Fig. 5), Lophomonas (Fig. 45), etc. True internal skeletons, however, do not occur. An external shell or house may be present, enclosing the whole body. The protoplasmic body shows, in the amoeboid forms sdch as the Rhizomastigina (p. 268), distinct ectoplasm and endoplasm. But as a general rule the thin ectoplasm is converted into a firm cuticle, or periplast, enclosing the body and containing contractile elements — myonemes. Hence the ectoplasm appears at first sight to be absent, and the protoplasmic body to consist of endoplasm alone. In larger forms the myonemes can be made visible by suitable treatment (Fig. 28), but as a general rule in such minute organisms the existence of myonemes or other contractile mechan- isms can only be inferred from the movements of contractility or flexibility which the body exhibits. The flagella may perform various functions hi different cases ; they may serve as organs of locomotion and of food-capture, as organs of temporary attachment, and as tactile organs. As stated above (p. 52), they may be distinguished by their relation to the progression of the organism, af tracteUa, anterior, and pulsella, posterior in movement. The flagella vary in number and in arrange- ment in different species, and for the different types of the flagellar apparatus a number of technical terms are in use : monomastigote, with a single flagellum (Fig. 38) ; isomastigote, with two or four flagella of equal length (Fig. 43) ; paramastigote, with one long principal flagellum and a short accessory flagellum (Fig. 15) ; heteromastigote, with one or more anterior flagella directed forwards, and a " trailing flagellum " directed backwards (Figs. 5, 25) ; polymastigote, with a tuft of flagella (Fig. 45) ; and holomastigote, with numerous flagella scattered evenly over the body (Fig, 113). Of these various types of arrangement, the heteromastigote con- 260 THE PROTOZOA dition, with a backwardly-directed trailing flagellum (" Schlepp- geissel"), deserves special attention, since by attachment of the trailing flagellum to the body an undulating membrane (p. 56) may arise ; and that it has actually so arisen in some cases is indicated by the existence of pairs of similar forms, in which a FIG. 110. — Codonosiga botrytis. A, Young specimens attached singly to the stalk of a Vortieella ; B, colony of six individuals on a common stalk ; G, stalked individual which has recently divided into two, pro- ducing a dichotomous division of the stalk, c.v., Contractile vacuole. After Stein. trailing flagellum, free from the body, in the one form is represented by the marginal flagellum of an undulating membrane in the other — as, for example, Trichomastix and Trichomonas (Fig. 5) , Prowazekia (Fig. 141), and Trypanoplasma (Fig. 36). Tn one group of flagellates — hence known as the Choanoflagellata THE MASTIGOPHORA 261 or Craspedomonads (Fig. 110) — a peculiar structure occurs, known as the " collar," a delicate protoplasmic tube or funnel which arises along a circular base-line of which the insertion of the flagellum is the centre, and so forms a cup, sleeve, or collar-like structure surrounding the flagellum for about a third or a half of its length. It is stated, both for Choanoflagellates and for the very similar collar-cells of sponges, that the collar is a membrane folded in a spiral manner, its insertion running along the body and round the base of the flagellum ; but the spiral structure is not easy to make out. The Choanoflagellates are sedentary forms which, if set free temporarily from their attachment, swim with the flagellum directed backwards, doubtless the mechanical result of the presence of the collar. The function of the collar is probably connected with the capture and absorption of food-particles wafted towards the body by the flagellum. The collar is retractile, but is n.ot capable of active movements such as are seen in an undulating membrane. The organs of nutrition must be considered in connection with the four modes of life already mentioned. (a) In holozoic forms the organism captures and ingests other organisms of various kinds. In some forms the ingestion of food- particles may take place at any point on the body surface ; examples of this are the amoeboid forms, such as Mastigamoeba, which capture their food by means of their pseudopodia, like an amoeba ; the holo- mastigote genus Multicilia (Fig. 113) ; the parasitic Lophomonas (Fig. 45), and possibly others. But in most cases food-particles are ingested at the base of the flagellum, the spot towards which they are propelled by the activity of the flagellum itself. There may, however, be no special aperture tor food-ingestion, particles which impinge upon the soft protoplasmic body being simply absorbed directly with formation of a food-vacuole. With a more advanced type of organization, a special aperture or cytostome for the ingestion of food-particles is found at the base of the flagellum. The cytostome may be a simple aperture leading through the cuticle directly, or by means of a funnel-shaped depression, into the proto- plasmic body, or it may, in more highly organized forms, lead into a special tube, termed an " oesophagus " or " cytopharynx," which receives the evacuations of the contractile vacuoles, and serves for excretion as well as ingestion (Fig. 84). In any case the oesophagus ends blindly in the fluid endoplasm. There is no special anal aper- ture for expulsion of faecal material, which is expelled at any point of the body-surface in primitive forms, or through the oesophagus and cytostome in those more highly organized. (b) In holophytic forms the organs of nutrition are those of the plant-cell (p. 188) — namely, chromatophores, or corpuscles contain- ing chlorophyll or allied pigments ; pyrenoids, small glistening bodies 262 THE PROTOZOA embedded in the chromatophores, the centres of the formation of amyloid substances ; and grains of amyloid nature formed by the constructive metabolism of the organism. It is also common to find in the holophytic flagellates a peculiar red spot, or stigma, placed near the anterior end of the body, and probably sensitive to light (p. 205). In general, two types of holophytic flagellates can be recognized : first, forms in which, in addition to the organs already mentioned, those pertaining to the holozoic mode of nutrition are also present ; secondly those possessing only the holophytic apparatus. The first type may be regarded as more primitive forms in which the holophytic habit of life has not become so engrained as to exclude any other mode of nutrition ; but a change is still possible, and the organism can combine or vary the holophytic with the holozoic or saprophytic method. In the second type the organism has be- come plant-like, to the complete exclusion of other methods of nutrition ; the body is generally enclosed completely in a firm cellu- lose envelope, allowing diffusion of liquids and gases, but without apertures through which foreign bodies can pass into the interior. Such forms, if they lose their flagellum in the adult state, are classed as unicellular Algae, and the young flagellated individuals are termed " zoospores." The transition from holophytic flagellates to plants is a gradual one, and the border-line is simply fixed by the characters of the " adult," and is therefore as arbitrary as that between Sar- codina and Mastigophora discussed in a previous chapter. (c) In saprophytic and parasitic forms no special organs of nutri- tion are present, since the food is absorbed in a fluid condition from the surrounding medium. Contractile vacuoles are commonly present in those flagellates which inhabit fresh water. In the more primitive forms the vacuoles empty themselves direct to the exterior. In more highly organized types the vacuoles open into the oesophagus. In Euglena the two contractile vacuoles open into a reservoir-vacuole, which, according to Wager (213), is in open communication with the oesophagus (Fig. 84). The nuclear apparatus consists, as a rule, of a single nucleus of vesicular type, with a distinct karyosome. Chromidia are generally absent, but are found in a few cases (Rhizomastigina). The relations of the nuclear apparatus and the flagella have been dis cussed above, and are briefly as follows : 1. There is a single nucleus with a single centriole, which functions at the same time as centrosome and blepharoplast. Then either (a) the centriole is within, or connected intimately with, the nucleus, in which case the fla- gellum appears to arise directly from the nucleus, as in Mastigina (Fig. 38) ; or (6) the centriole, and the flagellum it gives off, are quite independent of the nucleus, as in Mastigetta (Fig. 40). THE MASTIGOPHORA 263 2. There is a single nucleus with its centrpsome, and in addition one or more blepharoplasts in relation to the flagellar apparatus. Then (a) at division the old blepharoplasts and flagella are lost, and new blepharoplasts arise during or after nuclear division from the centrosomes ; or (b) the blepharo- plasts and flagella persist, and the former divide independently to form daughter- blepharoplasts from which new flagella arise (Fig. 43). 3. In a certain number of Flagellata, grouped provisionally as Haemo- flagellates or Binucleata (see next chapter), two nuclei, each probably possess- ing its own centrosome, are present : a principal or trophic nucleus and an accessory or kinetic nucleus. In Type 2 the blepharoplast attains to a greater or less degree of indepen- dence of the centrosome, and divides independently of it for many generations of ordinary vegetative reproduction by fission. But there are probably in all cases periods in the life -cycle when the entire nuclear apparatus is reduced to a single nucleus and centrioto, from which the condition in the adult, whatever it may bo, arises. For the so-called fourth type of Hartmann and Chagas (62), see below (p. 273). Reproduction and Life-Cycle. — The commonest method of repro- duction is simple or binary fission in the free state. The products of the fission are of equal size, and the division of the body is in- variably longitudinal (Senn, 358) — that is to say, along an axis continuing the direction of the principal flagelmm or flagella. In addition to this, the typical method of reproduction, other types of division occur. Multiple fission in the free active condition is known in some parasitic forms, such as Ttypanosoma leioisi and Lophomonas blattarum (Janicki, 70). On the other hand, fission may sometimes take place in a resting, non-flagellated condition, or within a cyst ; in the first case it is frequently, in the second perhaps alwayss of a multiple type. The occurrence of syngamy in the life-cycle is a point which has been disputed, probably owing to the fact that in forms of simple structure it takes place only at long intervals in the life- cycle, or under special conditions. Moreover, the longitudinal division prevalent in this group makes it practically very difficult to decide, except by continuous observation, whether two conjoined flagellates are individuals about to fuse in syngamy or to separate after fission. In the colonial Phytomonadina, where highly-differ- entiated gametes are found, the occurrence of syngamy lias long been known, but the existence of sexual processes in other flagel- lates has been doubted by high authorities. In recent years, how- ever, it has been observed in a number of forms, and there can be no doubt of the existence of sexual processes in flagellates generally. A summary of recent observations, with full references, is given by Dobell (335, pp. 109-111). The available data are as yet insufficient to make it possible to give a connected account of syngamic pro- cesses in Flagellata generally, and only a few typical cases can be dealt with here. A simple type of syngamy has been described in Copromonas 264 THE PROTOZOA subtilis (Fig. Ill) by Dobell (335). In this species the two gametes appear perfectly similar to each other, and are not, in fact, distin- guishable in any way from ordinary individuals of the species. Two such individuals come together and unite by their anterior or flagellar extremities. In one gamete the flagellum is lost, and the couple swims about by means of the re- maining one ; this is the only difference between the two gametes which could be interpreted as one of sex. While fusion of the bodies is still incomplete, the nucleus of each gamete divides by a simple type of promitosis (p. 109). One of each pair of sister- nuclei thus produced is a reduction - nucleus, which degenerates ; the other persists. The per- sistent nucleus of each gamete then divides a second time, but into two very unequal halves; the smaller nucleus in each case degenerates as a reduction -nucleus, while the larger persists as the pronucleus. The bodies of the gametes are now completely fused, and the fusion of the pronuclei follows. The zygote may become en- cysted at once, or may continue to live a free Hie. In the first case the fusion of the pro- nuclei takes place within the cyst, from which it is ultimately set free as an ordinary individual which feeds and multiplies vegeta- tively. In the second case the zygote becomes an ordinary free individual at once, the interlude of encystment being omitted. FIG. 111. — Life-cycle of Copromonas subtilis. A, Ordinary adult form ; B, C, D, " vegetative " reprodiiction by binary fission ; E — J, stages of reduction and syngamy : F, Q, H, reduction ; /, J, fusion of the two pronuclei ; the zygote (/) may develop into an ordinary free-swimming individual, or (J) may retract its flagcllum and become encysted ; K, cyst ; L, liberation of an adult form from the cyst. After Dobell (335). THE MASTIGOPHORA 265 The syngamy of Copromonas is thus seen to be a case of perfect isogamy, and is probably to be regarded as representing a very primitive type, whence the more complex sexual processes of other Flagellata have been evolved — (1) by greater specialization and differentiation of the gametes in their relation to other phases of the life-cycle (gamete-formation) and to one another (sexual differ- entiation) ; (2) by correlation of the sexual phases with definite crises, to which they become restricted, in the general life-cycle. In the Rhizomastigina sexual processes occur of a type resembling those found in the Sarcodina to such an extent as to indicate that the affinities of this group is rather closer to some of the primitive Rhizopods than to typical Flagellata. The life-cycle (Fig. 112) has been worked out in full detail in Mastigdla vitrea by Goldschmidt (41). Vegetative reproduction in the free state is by binary fission of the ordinary type, and occurs when food is abun- dant ; a falling-off in the supply of nutriment leads to gamete-formation and syngamy. In the earliest stages of the sexual generation a differentiation of the individuals into macrogametocytes and microgametocytes is to be observed, though externally they are similar to ordinary individuals and continue their vegetative life during the early stages of gamete-formation. In the macrogametocyte, first a quantity of nucleolar substance, and then of chromatin, is set free from the nucleus ; these two substances unite to form a chromidial mass from which a nuniber of secondary nuclei are formed. The secondary nuclei become scattered through the cytoplasm, and each becomes surrounded by a protoplasmic body. The small cell thus formed is a macrogamete, which goes through reducing divisions. The still active macrogametocyte, which has its cytoplasm crammed with the small gametes, now becomes encysted. Within the cyst the gametes acquire flagella and become motile. At this stage the original nucleus of the gametocyte breaks up and disappears rather suddenly. Finally the cyst- wall is ruptured and the flagellated gametes escape. The formation of the microgametes takes place in a manner essentially similar to that already described for the macrogamctes, but with a few differences in detail. The microgametocytes become encysted at the very beginning of the process ; then formation of chromidia begins, and as soon as it is completed the primary nucleus degenerates ; the microgametes have no flagella, and are shot out of the cyst when it bursts. The free macrogametes measure on the average about 3'6 /i diameter, and have a flagellum 15 to 18 /i in length ; the microgametes are 2'8 p in diameter, and have no flagellum. A macrogamete seeks out a microgamete and fuses with it, cytoplasm and nucleus. The zygote retains the flagellum of the macrogamete, and becomes a small, monad-like individual which multiplies by fission as such. After several generations the monads cease to multiply, and each grows up into an adult Mastigetta. A development similar in the main is described by Goldschmidt for Mastigina, but some of the phases escaped his observation. Comparing the sexual cycle of Mastigdla (Fig. 112) with that of Copromonas (Fig. Ill), the chief difference is seen to be that in the former an ordinary individual does not become a gamete directly but a gametocyte, which by a process of multiple fission gives rise to a generation of minute swarm-spores, the gametes. In the two sexes a slight differentiation of the gametes is seen. Further, in the life-cycle of Mastigdla considered as a whole, there are two forms of individuals, each capable of multiplying vegetatively for many 266 THE PROTOZOA generations — namely, the monad form, product of syngamy, and the adult, mastigamo3ba-form, which ultimately produces the monad-like gametes. Hence the life-cycle in such a type is an alternation of generations (metagenesis), which, as in so many other FIG. 112. — Life-cycle of Mastigdla vitrea, diagrammatic. 1, 2, and 3, Different forms assumed by the adult " vegetative " type of individual ; 3o. 36, repro- duction by binary fission; 4 — 10, gamete - formation ; o (in each case), microgamete-formation, 6, macrogamete-formation ; in the former the gamont becomes encysted, and the principal nucleus degenerates early in the process ; in the latter the gamont remains motile and the principal nucleus persists to the last : 4 — 6, extrusion oi chromidia from the nucleus and formation of secondary nuclei ; 7, 8, formation of the gametes round the secondary nuclei ; 9, extrusion of the gametes ; 10a, the small, non-flagellated micro- gametes ; 106, the larger, flagellated macrogametes ; 11, copulation of the gametes ; 12, 12o, 126, multiplication by binary fission of the monad-like zygote ; 13, 14, growth of the monad-form, after a period of multiplication, into the adult mastigamoeba-form. After Goldschmidt (41). oases in the animal kingdom, appears to have come about by mul- tiplicative processes taking place in a larval type, phylogenetically older — namely, the monad form, the only form of individual that THE MASTIGOPHORA 267 occurs in the life-cycle of Copromonas. In Mastigina, on the other hand, the monad form developed from the zygote apparently does not multiply by fission, but develops directly into the adult form — perhaps a more primitive state of affairs. A very instructive series is furnished by the colony-forming Phytomonads of the family Volvocidoe. At one end of the seriec are primitive types, such as Stephanosphcera, where the colony is composed of eight monad individuals, all alike, which may be agamonts in one colony or gamonts in another. Each agamont multiplies by fission to form eight small cells, which remain con- nected together and grow into full-sized monads, thus giving rise directly to new colonies. In the gamont-colonies each gamont (gametocyte) gives rise by multiple fission to a large number of minute biflagellate swarm-spores, the gametes, which are set free and copulate. The syngamy is perfectly isogamous. The zygote grows in size, and finally multiplies to form the eight monads of a new colony. At the other end of the series are the species of the genus Volvox, in which the colony is composed of a great number of individuals, which may be of three lands, not necessarily all present in the same colony : (1) The ordinary " somatic " monads, locomotor and trophic in function, which do not reproduce themselves in any way ; (2) agamonts, so-called " parthenogonidia," which multiply by fission to form daughter-colonies ; (3) gamonts or gametocytes, which are sexually differentiated as " microgonidia " and " macro- gonidia." The microgonidia produce by multiple fission a swarm of small biflagellate microgametes, comparable to the gametes of Stephanospkcera. In the macrogonidia, on the other hand, multi- plicative processes are in abeyance, and each becomes a single, ovum- like macrogamete, which is fertilized by the relatively minute microgamete. Thus, the syngamy in Volvox is anisogamous to the highest degree ; and, as in other cases among Protozoa, this condition appears to have arisen from a primitive isogamy in which, in both sexes, the gametocytes sporulated to produce a swarm of minute gametes, by the process of sporulation becoming altogether suppressed in one sex — namely, the female — while retained in its primitive form in the other. The colonies of Volvox, with their differentiation of individuals, exhibit a condition transitional to that of the Metazoa. The trophic, non-reproductive individuals, taken as a whole, may be compared to the Metazoan soma, the repro- ductive individuals to the germen. In Pleodorina californica dis- tinct male, female, or parthenogenetic colonies occur (Chatton), as is the case in some species of Volvox. Classification. — The Flagellata are classified in different ways by different authors, and in the present state of our knowledge of the group no system can be regarded as in any way final. As in other groups of Protozoa, there 268 THE PROTOZOA are a certain number of well-defined orders and families characterized by the possession in common of certain features of organization which leave no doubt as to their taxonomic homogeneity. On the other hand, there are a large number of primitive forms whose characteristics are mainly of a negative order, and of which the affinities are in consequence vague and uncertain, the systematic position debatable. There is, moreover, frequently an element of uncertainty, in the case of many forms, as to whether they represent truly specific adult forms, or merely developmental stages of some other soccies of the Flagcllata or Sarcodina. Finally there are a certain number of species and genera concerning which it is still debated whether they should be assigned to the Mastigophora or some other class of Protozoa. Hartmann and Chagas (62) have proposed to utilize the relations of the flagellar to the nuclear apparatus for systematic classification of the FlageUata, as suggested also by Prowazek (354). But, apart from the fact that these relations have as yet been investigated in very few flagellates, and that in such minute objects the details are very difficult to make out and liable to be a subject of dispute, it may be doubted whether these points of structure are sufficiently constant to be of classificatory value in this subclass, since they appear to vary considerably in allied forms. Thus in Copromonas subtilis, according to Dobell (335), the blepharoplast persists through division- phases, and divides independently of the nucleus ; but in C. major, according to Berliner, the old blepharoplast and flagellum are lost at each division, and a new blepharoplast, from which the new flagellum grows out, is formed by division of the nuclear centriole in each daughter-individual. Again, the third type of flagellar insertion (p. 263) is found in the Trypanosomidce, allied to the Cercomonadidce, and in the trypanoplasms, which belong to the family Bodonidce, as shown in the next chapter. Classification by these characters is, therefore, at least premature, if not fallacious. Compare also Senn (358). The classification adopted here is in the main that of Doflein (7), with certain modifications. For convenience a number of forms are put together in the Pantastomina, without, however, claiming that this order is anything more than a cataloguer's makeshift for disposing of a number of forms of dubious position and uncertain affinities. ORDER I. : PAKTASTOMINA. — Holozoic, with no definite mouth-opening ; food-particles ingested at any point on the surface of the body. Suborder 1 : Rhizomastigina. — Body amoeboid ; food captured and ingested by means of pseudopodia. Several genera, only known as yet from fresh water, are referred to this very interesting group ; such are Mastigamoeba, F. E. Schulze, Mastigina, Frenzel (Fig. 38), and Mastigetta, Frenzel (Fig. 40), distinguished from one another by the nature of their amoeboid movement and the characters of their pseudopodia. In appearance the species resemble amoebae which possess a long and well-developed flagellum, or in Dimastigamoeba two, in Trimastig- amceba (Whitmore, 280) three flagella. Locomotion and food-capture are carried on for the most part as in an amoeba, and the flagellum appears to function chiefly as a tactile organ in the adult mastigamoeba-phase ; in the young monad- phase, on the other hand, the flagellum is the sole organ of locomotion and food-capture, as in an ordinary flagellate. The relation of the flagellum to the nucleus is of Type 1 described above (p. 263), a single centriole which functions both as centrosome and blepharoplast ; in Mastigina and Mastigamoeba the flagellum arises from the nucleus (Type la) ; in Masti- getta the origin of the flagellum is distinct from the nucleus (Type 16). The life-cycle of Mastigetta is described above (p. 265). In many points, especially in the formation of secondary gamete-nuclei from chromidia, the develop- ment resembles more that of the Sarcodina than that of the Flagellata, and by many authorities the affinities of the Rhizomastigina are considered to be rather with the first of these two classes. The mastigamoebae certainly link the true flagellates with the Proteomyxa and Mycetozoa ; and if the flagellum were lost in the adult phase, they would be classed in the Sarcodina without hesitation. Fio. 113. — A, Multictlia lacustris, after Lauterborn. ft., Flagclla, one of which is curled up into a loop ; pa., pseu do podium -like process ; N., one of the nuclei (the others are hidden by the ingested food-masses) ; C., ingested Chla my do monads ; c., chlorophyll-bodies, the remains of other Chlamydo monads in process of digestion. B, Multicilia paluatris, after Penard. N., The single central nucleus. 270 THE PROTOZOA Suborder 2 : Holomastigina. — With numerous flagella radiating from a spherical or approximately spherical body. This suborder contains the single genus MulticHia, Cienkowski, to which several species, some fresh-water, some marine, have been referred. The number of flagella varies in different species, and their precise relation to the nuclear apparatus remains to be made out. M. lacustris, Lauterborn (Fig. 113, A), is multinucleate ; M. palustris, Pe"nard (Pig. 113, B), has a single nucleus. The body is not covered by a cuticle, and may throw out pseudo- podia, or even become amoeboid (Lauterborn). Nothing is known of the life-cycle, but in M. lacustris Lauterborn observed reproduction by simple fission (plasmotomy ?). In the present state of our knowledge adequate data are lacking for discussion or the affinities of this genus. Doflein (7) regards it as a form lying at the root of the Infusorian stem, and derives the most primitive Ciliata from a form similar to Midticilia, in which the numerous flagella become specialized in structure and movement to give rise to an even coat of cilia ; Peiiard (302), on the other hand, considers Multicilia allied to the Heliozoa (p. 249). It is clear that the genus is one which would repay further study. ORDER II. : PBOTOMONADINA. — Flagellates for the most part of small or minute size ; with a single flagellum ; or with a principal and one or two acces- sory flagella ; or with two flagella, one directed anteriorly, the other pos- teriorly as a trailing flagellum. Nutrition holozoic, saprophytic, or parasitic ; in the first case the food-particles are ingested at the base of the flagellum, where a definite mouth-opening may be present or absent, but without a distinct oesophagus in any case. The contractile vacuole is generally single, if present, and empties itself direct to the exterior. This order .comprises a vast assemblage of genera and species, subdivided by Doflein into eight families, one of which, the Trypanosomidce, including the important parasitic genus Trypanosoma, is discussed in detail in the next chapter. The cuticle is generally thin, and the body is often capable of amoeboid or metabolic movements ; if amoeboid, however, the flagellum is the organ of locomotion, so long as it is present, and not the pseudopodia. The relations of the flagellum to the nuclear apparatus are, in general, of the second type (p. 263), according to Hartmann and Chagas (62) — that is to say, with distinct centrosome and blepharoplast ; but it is extremely probable that in the simpler forms Type 1 occurs also (compare Alexeieff, 327), and in the Trypanosomidoe the distinctive feature is the possession of Type 3, with trophonucleus and kinetonucleus, as also in some of the Bodonidce (Prowa- zekia). The life-cycle of the free-living forms is probably in general of a simple type, similar to that described above in Copromonas (Fig. Ill) ; but observations on the sexual processes are at present very scanty. For a detailed description of the forms included in this order the reader must be referred to the larger treatises, especially Biitschli (2) and Senn (320) ; it must suffice here to mention some of the more typical forms. Cercomonas, type of the family Cercomonadidce (Fig. 114), has a single flagellum ; the hinder end is frequently drawn out into a long tail-like process, and is capable of change of form. (Ecomonas (Oikomonas) differs in having the body rounded. Monas, type of the family Monadidos, has a principal flagellum and one or two accessory flagella. Cladomonas and Spongomonas (Figs. 41, 42) form arborescent colonies ; the constituent monads have two flagella of equal size, both directed forwards. Alexeieff (327) considers that the Monadidce should be placed in the suborder Chrysomonadina (see below). Bodo (Fig. 115), type of the family Bodonidce, has two flagella, one directed forwards, the other backwards as a trailing flagellum ; the species of this genus are free-swimming and do not form colonies ; they occur both free- living and parasitic, for the most part in the digestive tracts of various animals. Bodo lacertcs, from the cloaca of Lacerta spp., has been studied by Prowazek (354), who has described a process of autogamy, but doubt has been cast upon his observations by Dobell (336). Note also the occurrence of Bodo-liko forms in the development of Gryptodifflngiq, (p. 230, supra). The flagellate THE MASTIGOPHORA 271 recently described by Wenyon (361) from a culture of human faeces, and referred by him to the genus Cercomonas, would appear rather to belong to the genus Bodo. To the family Bodonidce must be referred also the genera Prowazekia and Trypanoplasma, dealt with in greater detail in the next chapter. Helcomastix, Senn (358), is to be referred to the Bodonidce or made the type of a distinct family ; its two flagella of unequal length are both directed backwards in move- ment. Finally, mention must be made of the group of flagel- lates characterized by the pos- session of a collar (see p. 261, supra), and hence commonly known aa " choanoflagel- lates" or " craspedomonads." They are sedentary forms, attached by the end of the body opposite to the flagellum, and may remain single, but more usually form colonies often of considerable extent (Fig. 110). The flagellum is used mainly for food-capture, in which the collar also pro- bably plays an important Flu. 114. — Cercomonas crassicauda, Dujardin, part ; but an individual may showing amoeboid changes of form. After become detached from its Stein, support, and swim freely, the flagellum being then directed backwards. The systematic position of the choanoflagellates has been differently estimated by different authors ; by some they have been ranked as a primary subdivision of the Flagellata, which are then divided as a whole into Choanoflagellata and Lissoflagellata, the second of these divisions being used to include all other flagellates. Since, however, the choanoflagellates scarcely differ from ordinary monads except in the possession of the characteristic collar, a specialization of the food- capturing function related to a sedentary life, they are now generally ranked as a family of the Protomonadina, the Choanoflagellidce. ORDER III. : POLYMASTIQINA.— Flagella from three to eight in number, usually all more or less equal in size ; in other points of structure similar to the last-mentioned order. Two families, which are sharply marked off from one another, are referred to this order. 1. Tetramitidoe, with three or more flagella, which all arise at the anterior end close together. The flagella may all be directed forwards, or one of them may be turned backwards as a trailing flagellum ; in the latter case the trailing flagellum may or may not be united to the body by an undulating membrane. The species referred to this family are for the most part parasitic. Endoparasitic forms of common occur- rence, especially in the digestive tracts of vertebrates, are Trichomastix, with three anterior flagella and a free trailing flagellum, and Trichomonas (Fig. 6), with the same number and arrange- ment of the flagella, but having the trailing flagellum united to the body by an undulating membrane. These two forms occur frequently in the same host, and are perhaps to be interpreted as two developmental phases of the same FIQ. 115.— A Bodo saltans, Ehren- berg. B. Bodo gracilis, Stein. After Stein. 272 THE PROTOZOA organism rather than as distinct generic types. Trichomonas hominis is ontozoic in the human intestine, T. vaginalis in the human vagina ; they appear to be harmless scavengers rather than parasites. The encystment of Trichomonas has been the subject of some controversy. According to Alexeieff (326), the supposed cysts of Trichomonas described by various authors are in reality independent vegetable organisms, of the nature of yeasts. In some species of Trichomonas the anterior flagella are four in number (Alexeieff, 323) ; for such forms Parisi (A.P.K., xix., p. 232) has founded a subgenus Tc.tr atricho- monas. The genus Macrostoma, according to Wenyon (362), differs from Trichomonas in having the undulating membrane wedged in a deep groove ; M . mesnili occurs in the human intestine. According to Alexeieff (324), Macrostoma ig a synonym of Tetramitus. Mono- cercomonas, including a number of common intestinal parasites, has four anterior flagella of equal length, or two longer, two shorter (Alexeieff, 325). Costia necatrix, also referred to this family, is ectoparasitic on the skin of fishes. According to Moroff, it has four flagella in two pairs, two larger and two smaller, all of which serve for locomotion ; but the larger pair are used also for fixation, and the smaller pair for wafting into the mouth the food-particles, which consist chiefly of dead epithelial cells torn away from the epidermis (see also Neresheimer). 2. Octomitidce.* — With six or eight flagella, arranged in pairs ; the body is bilaterally symmetrical in structure. Entozoic forms, for the most part of intestinal habitat. The remarkable bilateral symmetry of the species of this family is not merely an external characteristic of the body, but affects the internal structure as well, and the entire nuclear structure is doubled, with right and left halves. Octomitus (synonym, Hexamitus ; see Dobell, 236), with four pairs of flagella (Fig. 116), includes a number of entozoic species — e.g., 0. intestinalis, from the cloaca of the frog and other animals. Lamblia intestinalis (synonym, Megastoma enter icum, Pig. 117) is a common inhabitant of the human intestine. It becomes encysted, and is probably disseminated in this form. Within the cyst it divides into two (Rodenwaldt). L. sanguinis, described by Gonder (A.P.K., xxi., p. 209) from the blood of a falcon, is probably an intestinal parasite gone astray (vide p. 258). The order Polymastigina differs little from the Protomonadina except in the complication of the flagellar apparatus, correlated probably with the entozoic habit. Hartmann and Chagas propose to merge the Polymastigina * Doflein terms this family the Polymastigidai, but the name is clearly in- admissible, since the genus Polymastix belongs to the preceding family, and is closely allied to Trichomonas, but has six anterior flagella and no trailing flagellum (compare Alexeieff, 325). Fio. 116. — Octomitus dujar- dini. W.1, Anterior blep- haroplast, from which the first and second flagella of that side of the body arise ; W.2, second blepharoplast, giving off the flagellum of the third pair ; #., left-hand nucleus ; ax., left axostyle ; U.3, third blepharoplast, at the extremity of the axo- style, giving off one of the flagella of the fourth pair. All the structures indicated are paired, and the letters indicate the member of each pair on the left side of the body. After Dobell (236). THE MASTIGOPHORA 273 in the Protomonadina, and then to divide the order into two suborders ; the first, entitled the Monozoa, would include the Protomonadina as constituted above, with the exception of the Trypanoaomidce (" Binucleata "), and with the addition of the Tetramitidce. The second suborder, Diplozoa, would in-, elude only the Octomitidce. This arrangement certainly seems more natural than that which is usually adopted, so far as the Tetramitidce and Octomitidce are concerned. ORDER IV. : ETJQLBNOIDINA. — Larger forms, with mouth.-aperture and oesophagus ; with a complex vacuole-system opening into the oesophagus ; often with holophytie apparatus, ehromatophores, stigma, etc. This order represents, so far as structural complication of the individual is concerned, the highest type of organization among Flagellata. The body may be metabolic, or of definite contours, with thick cuticle. The free -living FIG. 117. — Laniblia intestinalis. A, Ventral view ; B, aide view. N., One of the two nuclei ; ax., axostyles ; /Z.1, ft.2, ft.3, ft.*, the four pairs of flagella ; a., sucker- like depressed area on the ventral surface ; x, bodies of unknown function. After Wenyon (277). forms are either holozoio or saprophytic, if colourless, or holophytic if pro- vided with chromatophores, in which case they may be capable of nourishing themselves by more than one method. The flagellum may be single, or there may be a second flagellum, usually smaller than the principal flagellum, and sometimes directed backwards as a trailing flagellum. The attachment of the flagellum is of the second type (p. 263), with blepharoplast distinct from the centrosome. According to Hartmann and Chagas (62), in Peranema trichophorum the centrosome first divides to furnish a blepharoplast, and the latter, having become completely independent of the nucleus, divides into two, a distal blepharoplast or basal granule of the flagellum, connected by a rhizoplast (centrodesmose) with the proximal blepharoplast or anchoring granule. The authors consider that this should be regarded as a fourth type 18 274 THE PROTOZOA of flagellar insertion, characteristic of this order ; but it is simplest to regard it merely as a secondary complication of the second type, and one which is not universal in this order, since in Copromonas subtilis the blepharoplast remains undivided, so that this species shows a flagellar attachment strictly of the second type. In Euglena, according to Wager (213), the flagellum passes through the oesophagus and becomes attached to the wall of the reservoir- vacuole by a bifurcate base. On one of the branches is a distinct thickening in close contact with the stigma (p. 206). The thickening is prob- ably the blepharoplast, and the two branches represent the rhizoplast. The sexual processes of the Euglenoidina are but little known, and Copro- monas is the only genus in which the complete life -cycle has been worked out ; in this species it is of a simple type (p. 264, Fig. 111). The order comprises three families. The first, Euglenidce, contains forms provided with chromatophores, ho'ophytic, saprophytic, and parasitic (Haswell) in habit. Examples: Euglena (Fig. 4), Phacus (Fig. 118). The second family, Astasiidce, contains the genus Astasia (Fig. 15), colourless and saprophytic or parasitic. The third family, Per- anemidce, contains numerous genera without chro- matophores, holozoic or saprophytic. Examples : Peranema, Copromonas (Fig. 111). The subfamilies HeteronemincB and Anisonemince are heteromastigote. Example : Anisonema (Fig. 25). ORDER V. : CHROMOMONADINA. — Small forms, with- out oesophagus or vacuole-system, with delicate cuticle and one or two flagella ; their characteristic feature is the possession, usually, of one or two conspicuous chromatophores, green, yellow, or brownish, in colour. The nutrition, for the most part holophytic, may be also holozoic or saprophytic. Divided into two suborders. Suborder 1 : Chrysomonadina. — With one or two flagella and one or two yellowish-brown chroma- tophores ; body often amoeboid or metabolic ; colony- formation frequent ; nutrition holozoic and holophytic. Three families. Examples : Chrysamaeba, Chromulina, Dinobryon, etc. According to Scherffel, Chrysamceba is the amoeboid, non-flagellated phase of Chromulina ; compare also Lauterborn (345'5). To this suborder must be referred also the Coccolithophoridce. marine flagellates which secrete the calcareous shells known as coccoliths (vide Lohmann). Suborder 2 : Cryptomonadina. — Small forms with one or two flagella, colour- less, or with chromatophores ranging in colour from yellowish-brown to olive- green or blue-green. Holophytic or saprophytic, not holozoic. Examples : Chilomonas, colourless ; Cryptomonas, some species of which are symbiotic in Sarcodina (p. 15). Doflein refers the Silicoflagellata to this order (p. 255). ORDER VI.: PHYTOMONADINA SEU PHYTOFLAGELLATA. — Completely and exclusively holophytic, with cellulose envelope and without mouth-aperture. This order comprises the most plant-like flagellates, to all intents and purposes unicellular algae which retain throughout life their flagellar apparatus and their motility. The individual is generally small, and the body is, except in one family, of definite form and enveloped in a rigid cellulose envelope which may stand off from the body, and is perforated by pores through which the flageila pass out to the exterior. The flagella are usually two in number, sometimes four, of equal size. The cytoplasm generally contains a large green chromatophore and a red stigma. The flagellar insertion, according to Hartmann and Chagas, is of the second type, as in Protomonadina. The reproduction may take the form of multiple fission within the body-envelope to form numerous swarm-spores, which when set free may be gametes or agametes. Colony-formation is frequent in this order (p. 257). FIG. 118. — Phacus triqueter. o&s., (Eso- phagus ; c.v., con- tractile vacuole ; st., stigma ; N., nucleus. After Stein. 275 Three families are recognized. The first, represented by the genus Pyra- mimonas, contains primitive forms in which the body is metabolic and the cellulose envelope is absent. The second family, Chlamydomonadidce, com- prises non- colonial forms such as CMamydomonas, Hcematococcus, etc. Nephro- B Jb'iG. 119. — Gonium •peciorale: colony of sixteen individuals, each with two flagella. A, In surface view ; B, in side view. N., Nuclei ; c.v., contractile vacuoles ; at., stigmata. After Stein. selmis. referred by Senn (358) to this family, has two flagella, on which it creeps like a Bodo. The third family, Volvocidce, comprises colony-forming species in which the individual is similar in structure to the Chlamydomonads, and the colony is composed of individuals ranging in number from four, eight, 276 THE PROTOZOA sixteen, or thirty- two, up to many thousands. Examples are Gonium (Fig. 119), Stephanosphcera, Volvox, etc. In addition to the six orders of flagellates enumerated above, there remain some peculiar parasitic forms, the systematic position of which is extremely doubtful. Such are the family Lophomonadidce, represented by Lophomonas Uattarnm, a common parasite of the end-gut of the cockroach and other Orthoptera, and the Trichonymphidce. including the genus Trichonympha and allied forms, parasitic in the end-gut of termites of various species. Lophomonas blattarum, which has recently been studied by Janicki (70), bears a tuft of flagella arising at the anterior pole of the body from a double ring, or rather horseshoe, of blepharoplasts^ situated at the edge of a funnel- shaped or cup-like structure, the calyx, which is prolonged into an axostyle (Fig. 45). The nucleus hes within the calyx, which is surrounded in its turn by a peculiar thickening or support, termed the " collar," consisting of free, radially-disposed rods crowded together to form an aureole-like figure, approxi- mately spherical. The nutrition is holozoic, and food-particles are ingested at any point on the body-surface, as in the Pantastomiua. Multiplication takes place by binary or multiple fission in the free state ; and division of the nucleus up to eight within a cyst has been observed, but the entire life-cycle has not been worked out. Associated with L. blattarum, another form, L. striata, occurs, but it is doubtful if this is a distinct species, or a phase or condition of L. blattarum. The group or family Trichonymphidce comprises a number of peculiar parasites found in the digestive tract of various species of Termitidce ; such are the genera Joenia, Lophophora, Calonympha, Devescovina, etc., and finally the genus Trichonympha, from which the family takes its name. The chief peculiarity of these forms is the possession of numerous flagella, which may be disposed in tufts at the anterior end of the body, in a manner, similar to Lophomonas (which by some authorities is included in this family), or may be distributed over the whole body, like a coat of cilia, as in the genera Trichonympha, Dinenympha, etc. According to Harfcmann, Trichonympha hertwigi occurs under two forms, which he believes to represent male and female gamonts. They multiply by binary fission, and also by a process of sporulation to produce swarm- spores which are believed to be gametes. Dinenympha also exhibits sexual dimorphism, according to Comes (333). From Janicki's investigations, there can be no doubt that Lophomonas is a true flagellate, possibly allied to Trichomonas, possibly, however, to the Pan- tastomina. The genus Joenia, parasitic in Calotermes flavicottis, was thought by its discoverer, Grassi, to connect Lophomonas and Trichonympha ; the recently-described genus Lophophora (Comes, 332) also has points of resem- blance to Lophomonas, but is remarkable for the presence of undulating mem- branes running the length of the body. By some authorities, however, the Trichonymphidce have been placed with the Ciliata, while Hartmann considers that they should rank as an independent class of the Protozoa. SUBCLASS II. : DINOFLAGELLATA SBU PERIDISIALES. The characteristic feature of this subclass is the possession of two flagella, which arise close together about the middle of the body. One flagellum (Fig. 120, e) runs longitudinally backwards as a trailing flagellum ; the other (Fig. 120, d) runs transversely round the body. It is further characteristic of this group for the cuticle to be greatly thickened, forming a tough cuirass, or lorica, investing the body. The two flagella are usually lodged in grooves in the cuirass, the longitudinal flagellum in a longitudinal groove or suleus, the transverse flagellum in a circular groove, or annulus. THE MASTIGOPHORA 277 The transverse flagellum executes undulating movements which were formerly mistaken for those of a ring of cilia ; hence the name Cilioflagellata formerly applied to this group. The cuirass, composed of cellulose or an allied substance, is in its typical form a perfectly rigid structure, and is often prolonged into spikes and processes which cause the body as a whole to assume strange or even monstrous forms (Fig. 121). Detailed studies on the skeleton have been published by Kofoid in a series of memoirs (374-383). The nutrition is for the most part holophytic, but in some species ingestion of solid food has been observed. A great many parasitic forms have been made known of recent years (Chatton, 366-369 ; Caullery, 364) ; these are for the most part forms which, in the vegetative, parasitic phase are inert bodies with no sign of locomotor organs, often fixed and pedunculate when ecto- parasitic ; but in their reproductive phases they betray their affinities by the formation of numerous flagellated swarm-spores exhibiting the typical Dinoflagellate structure. The pelagic species generally possess chroma- tophores, and frequently a red stigma, which in some genera — Pouchetia (Fig. 31), Erythropsis — is modified into an eye-like organ. The deep-sea forms, on the other hand, are colourless. In many Dinoflagellates a peculiar system of vacuoles is found (Fig. 122), consisting of two sacs containing watery fluid, each of which empties itself to the exterior by its own duct. They differ from ordinary contractile vacuoles in possessing a dis- tinct envelope and in not performing rhythmical contractions, and have hence been given the special name of " pusules " (Schiitt). One of these organs, termed the " collecting- pusule," consists of a reservoir- vacuole surrounafcd by a ring of smaller vacuoles which empty themselves into it ; the other, termed the " sack-pusule," is a large cavity which takes up a great part of the interior of the cuirass. The function of these organs is probably hydrostatic. The commonest method of reproduction is binary fksion in the transverse plane of the body, in which each daughter-individual receives a half of the cuirass of the parent and regenerates the half that is wanting. Fission rapidly repeated may lead to the formation of chains of individuals. In other cases multiple fission within the cuirass has been observed, leading to the formation of swarm-spores which are possibly gametes ; but little is known of the sexual processes of these organisms. The Dinoflagellates are an exceedingly abundant and widespread group, FIG. 120. — Glenodi- nium cinctum, Ehrenberg. a, Amyloid granules ; b, stigma ; c, chro- matophores ; d, flagellum of the transverse groove ; e, flagellum of the vertical groove ; v., vaouole. From Lankester. FIG. 121. — Ceratocorys horrida : cuirass. After Stein, from Lankester. 278 THE PROTOZOA highly differentiated as regards forms and species. The vast majority are pelagic in habit, and constitute an important element of the plancton fauna, both marine and fresh-water. A certain number of species are adapted to parasitic life. They are divided into two orders. ORDER I. : ADINIDA (Prorocentraceae). — Primitive forms in which the typical peculi- arities of Dinoflagellatc organization are not fully developed. The body-envelope consists of a bivalve shell without furrows. The two flagella emerge through an aperture between the two valves, and one flagellum projects' freely into the water, while the other twists round it at the base. Example : Prqrocentrum. ORDER II. : DINTFERA. — With the typical characters of the subclass, as described above. Families: (1) Oymnodinidae, without a well- developed cuirass — example : Qymnodinium ; the marine genus Oxyrrhia (Fig. 123) is referred to this family by Senn (358); it is holozoic in habit. (2) Peridinidce, with a well-developed cuirass made up of definite plates — examples : Qlenodinium (Fig. 120), Ceratiuru, Ceratocorys (Fig. 121), Peridinium, etc. ; Pyrodinium (Plate, 385) is remarkable for its intense phos- phorescence ; at the hinder pole, between the chromatophores, the cytoplasm contains a body, the " Nebenkorper " of Plate, surrounded by numerous oil-drops, which are perhaps the seat of the luminosity. (3) Dinophysidae, oceanic species with the cuirass divided by a sagittal suture, often of extraordinary form — example : DinopJiysis, etc. (4) Blastodinidce, a family created by Chatton (366, 367) for certain parasitic forms ; such are Blastodinium, an internal parasite of various copepods, and Apodinium mycetoides, an ectoparasite of appendicularians (Fritillaria). The parasitic vegetative form, without organs of locomotion, gives rise by periodic segmentation of mother- cells to successive generations of swarm-spores, >^Pi^£$k fir FIG. 122. — Peridinium diver- gens : ventral view showing the vacu&le-system. e.p., The collccting-pusule sur- rounded by a rosette of still smaller pusules which open into it ; s.p., the large sac- pusule, or reservoir ; both opening into the fundus (/.), from which both the trans- verse flagellum (<.), lying in the annulus (a.), and the longitudinal flagellum (I.), arise. After Schiitt, from Lankester. N which in their structure resemble Qymnodinium. SUBCLASS III. : CYSTOFLAGELLATA SEU KHYNCHOFLAGELL ATA . This group comprises a small number of forms all marine and pelagic in habitat. Their chief peculiarity is that, like so many other pelagic organisms of all classes, the body is inflated, as it were, with watery gelatinous substance, so that it attains to a size which far exceeds the actual bulk of the living substance con- tained in it. In consequence of the secondary increase in size, the powers of locomotion are feeble, and these organisms float more or less helplessly on the surface of the soa. eat. FIQ. 123. — Oxyrrhia marina, Duj. P., Peristome ; N., nucleus; f.v. food- vacuoles ; ex., excretory mass about to be ejected. After Blochmann, from Senn (slightly modified) ; magnification 1,000. THE MASTIGOPHORA 279 The best known form is the common Noctiluca miliaris of our coasts. The adult Noctiluca is about the size of an ordinary pin's head (1 to 1'5 millimetres in diameter). The spherical body consists chiefly of jelly, with at one pole a superficial concentration of the protoplasm containing the nuclei and giving off the locomotor organs. From this central mass of protoplasm strands extend in an irregular network through the whole body, which is limited by a thin pellicle. The central protoplasm bears the so-called " peristome," a deep groove containing the mouth-aperture near one end. The mouth is bordered by pro- jections known as the " tooth " and the " lip," and near it arise two motile organs — a small flagellum, and a large tentacle-like process which shows a transversely striated structure and performs twisting and lashing movements. The tentacle is sometimes named the " flagellum," and the true flagellum the " cilium " ; the former probably serves as the organ of locomotion, the latter for food-capture. The nutrition is holozoic. Noctiluca reproduces itself by binary fission, and also by multiple fission producing a brood of small flagellate swarm-spores. The formation of the latter has been stated to be preceded by isogamous conjugation of the adults, but the matter is open to doubt, and it is possible that the swarm-spores them- selves represent the gametes. Other genera of Cystoflagellata are Leptodiscus and Craspedotdla (Kofoid, 373), both remarkable for their superficial resem- blance to medusae. No tentacle like that of Noctiluca is present in either of these forms, and locomotion is effected by rhythmic contractions of the disc-like body. Bibliography. — For references see p. 486. CHAPTER XIII THE HiEMOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS General Characters and Principal Types. — Under the term " Hsemo- flagellates " are grouped together a number of forms of which the characteristic, though by no means invariable, habit is alternating parasitism in the blood of a vertebrate and in the digestive tract of a blood sucking invertebrate host. The group must be regarded, however, as one founded on practical convenience rather than on natural affinity — as a method of classification comparable to that of the gardener rather than of the botanist. The existence of a parasitic habit common to a number of different forms is in itself no proof of genetic affinity or community of descent, and it is highly probable that more than one line of ancestry has contributed, through divergent adaptation, to the composition of the group Haemoflagellates. The name itself has, moreover, lost much of its significance, since closely allied to the forms parasitic hi blood, and inseparable from them in a natural scheme of classification, are other forms parasitic only in invertebrates, or even free-living. The chief morphological characteristic of the Hsemoflagellates is the possession of two nuclei, a trophonucleus and a kinetonucleus, and the relation of the locomotor to the nuclear apparatus is of the third type distinguished in the preceding chapter (p. 263) ; on this account they are ranked by Hartmann and Jollos (390) as a distinct order of the Flagellata termed the Binucleata. The Haemoflagellates as a group comprise a number of forms which represent in some cases distinct generic types, in others merely developmental phases alternating with other forms in the life-cycles of particular species. The following six generic names represent the more important of these types : 1. Trypanosoma (Fig. 126, etc.), with a single flagellum which arises near the kinetonucleus, at the extremity of the body which is posterior in progression, and runs forward as the marginal flagellum of an undulating membrane. At the anterior end of the body the flagellum is usually continued as a free flagellum, but in some cases it ends with the undulating membrane. A vast number of species parasitic in the blood of vertebrates and in the digestive tract of 280 THE H^EMOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 281 invertebrates alternately are comprised in this genus. Trypano- some-forms also occur as developmental phases in the life-cycle of species parasitic solely in the digestive tracts of insects. 2. Trypanoplasma (Figs. 36, 134), with two flagella arranged in a heteromastigote manner, and with the posterior trailing flagellum united to the body by an undulating membrane for the greater part of its length. A number of species are known, which by their dis- tribution fall into three sections : (1) Species parasitic in the blood of fresh-water fishes, with alternating parasitism in the digestive tractw of leeches ; (2) species parasitic in the digestive tract of marine fishes ; (3) species parasitic in various invertebrates. 3. Crithidia (Fig. 135), with a single flagellum which arises near the kmetonucleus, at about the middle of the body, in front of or close beside the trophonucleus, and runs along the pointed anterior end of the body to form the marginal flagellum of a relatively short, often rudimentary, undulating membrane, beyond which it is continued as a free flagellum. As an independent genus this type comprises species parasitic in the digestive tracts of various insects ; but the majority of the so-called species of Crithidia aro merely phases in the developmental cycle of trypanosomes. 4. Leptomonas (Herpetomonas — Figs. 124, 136), with a single flagellum arising at the anterior end of the body, and with no trace of an undulating membrane. As an independent generic type this form occurs as a parasite of invertebrates, chiefly insects ; secondarily also in the latex of plants (Euphorbiacese). It occurs also as a developmental form of the next genus in the invertebrate host or in cultures. 5. Leishmania (Fig. 138), with an oval body containing a tropho- nucleus and kinetonucleus, but with no flagellum. As a generic type this form is an intracellular parasite of a vertebrate host, multiplying .there by fission and developing into a typical Lepto- wowas-form. On the other hand, as a developmental phase this form represents simply a non-flagellated, resting stage which may occur in the life-cycle of either Trypanosoma, Crithidia, or Leptomonas. 6. Prorvazekia (Fig. 141), with two flagella arranged in the hetero- mastigote manner, as in Trypanoplasma, but with the trailing flagellum quite free from the body, without an undulating mem- brane. Prowazekia is therefore quite similar in its morphology to Bodo, with which it was formerly confused, if, indeed, it is really distinct, and it differs from Bodo only in the possession of a kineto- nucleus. Several species are described, free-living or intestinal in habitat. Considering the above six types as a whole from a morphological standpoint, it is seen that there are two types of structure amongst them — the cercomonad or monomastigote type, represented by THE PROTOZOA Trypanosoma, Crithidia, and Leptomonas, of which Leishmania may be regarded as the resting, non-flagellated phase ; and the bodonid or heteromastigote type with two flagella, seen in Trypanoplasma and Prowazekia. We shall return to this point in considering the affinities of the group as a whole and of its constituent genera. The six types enumerated above are given with the nomenclature and definitions most commonly accepted, but it is necessary to state that the application and significance of the names Crithidia, Leptomonas, and Herpeto- monas, are much disputed and are far from being settled. The type of the genus Herpeto- monas of Saville Kent is a species found in the digestive tract of house-flies, H. muscce- dornesticce (Fig. 124). According to Prowazek (557), this form possesses normally two flagella, which are connected together by a membrane ; according to Patton (551) and many others, the biflagellate condition is due to precocious division of the normally single flagellum as a preparation for division of the body (compare Strickland, 558 ; Wenyon, 84). Those who follow Prowazek in regarding the biflagellate condition of Herpetomonas as its normal adult form employ the older genus Leptomonas of Saville Kent* for forms with, a single flagellum (Chatton,Boubaud, Prowazek). The main source of the confusion in the nomen- clature arises from the uncertainty which still exists in many cases as to whether a given form or structural type is to be regarded as an in- dependent specific or generic type, or as a developmental phase of another species. This applies especially to the genus Crithidia, founded by Leger (543) for a species, C. fasciculata, from the intestine of Anopheles maculipennis, and defined as a small uniflagel- late form shaped like a grain of barley (Greek, Kpidr)). Such forms, however, occur as developmental forms of trypanosomes or of leptomonads, and it is extremely probable that the species on which L6ger founded his genus" was simply a phase of this kind, which Wood- cock (527) has proposed to call the " trypano- monad" phase, in the development of a trypanosome. On this ground Dunkerly (535), who has recently discussed the whole question, considers that the name Crithidia cannot be used as a generic name at all, but must be merged in Leptomonas, the name that should be used for all the uniflagellate parasites of insect-guts ; while Herpetomonas should either become a synonym of Leptomonas, or should be used solely for Prowazek's biflagellate type, if that prove to be a distinct generic type. On the other hand, L6ger and Duboscq (646, p. 232, footnote) consider that Crithidia should be retained, and Leptomonas ranked as a * The genus Leptomonas was founded by Saville Kent, *' Manual of Infusoria," vol. i., p. 243, for L. butscMii, parasite of the nematode worm Trilobus gracilis ; the genus Herpetomonas was founded on p. 245 of the same work for H. muscce- domesticce and H. lewisi ( = Trypanosoma lewisi). Leptomonas is therefore techni- cally the older genus. B FIG. 124. — Herpetomonas muscce-domesticce (Burnett). A, Motile individual with two flagella ; B, cyst : n., nucleus ; bl, kinetonucleus. After Prowazek. THE H^MOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 283 synonym of it. The question ihas given rise to a controversy which has been carried on by some of the participants in an acrimonious and even unseemly manner, and which it would be unprofitable to discuss further here, since the question is one which must be decided ultimately by facts, and not by personal opinions or tastes. The various forms comprised in the Hsemoflagellates may now be considered in detail, beginning with the most important type. I. THE GENTJS TBYPANOSOMA. Occurrence. — Trypanosomes were first discovered as blood - parasites of cold-blooded vertebrates — fishes and batracbia ; the type-species of the genufa Trypanosoma is T. rotatorium (synonyms, T. sanguinis, Undulina ranarum) of the frog (Kana esculenta). Trypanosomes are now known, however, to occur commonly as blood-parasites in all classes of vertebrates. In a wild state many species of mammals, birds, and other vertebrate animals, are often found to harbour trypanosomes in their blood, though frequently in such scanty numbers as to render the detection of the parasites extremely difficult. It may be almost impossible in some cases to find trypanosomes in the blood of an animal by direct microscopic examination, owing to their great scarcity ; but in such cases an artificial culture made from the blood may reveal the presence of the parasites, since in a few days the trypanosomes originally present in small numbers in the blood multiply, under favourable conditions, to produce a swarm of flagellates. The cultural forms are quite different, as a rule, from the blood-forms which gave rise to them, and appear generally as crithidial or trypanomonad types ; thus, cultures furnish evidence of the existence of a trypanosome in a given host, but give no indication whatever of the type of parasite actually present in the blood. In some cases the trypanosomes appear to be present in the peripheral circulation of the vertebrate host only at certain periods, and at other times they are only to be found in the internal organs or tissues of the host, such as the spleen, bone-marrow, liver, lungs, etc. The trypanosome of Athene noctua — T. noctitce, for example — is to be found during the winter only in the bone-marrow of its host, and appears in the peripheral circulation during the summer months, and then most abundantly in the night-time (Minchin and Wood- cock, 42). Hence, for various reasons, it may often be extremely difficult to decide whether a given animal is infected with trypano- somes or not ; and in recent years trypanosomes have been dis- covered in animals in which their presence was previously quite unsuspected — for instance, in calves (Crawley, Carini, 423, Stockman ; see also Bulletin of the Sleeping Sickness Bureau, No. 29, p. 320) and in sheep (Woodcock 527, p. 713, footnote). N n- B Fio. 125. — Trypanosoma mega, from the blood of African frogs, fl.1, Marginal flagellum of the undulating membrane ; fl.z, free flagellum ; m., myoneme-striations (it is doubtful whether the granular streaks or the clear interspaces correspond exactly to the actual myonemes) ; n, kiuetonucleus ; N, space in which the trophonucleus lies, but, not being stained, it is not clearly denned in the preparation. After Minchin, magni- fied 2,000; compare Figs. 11 and 12 at the same magnification. THE ILEMOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 285 Effects on the Host. — The trypanosomes found infesting wild animals in Nature are, as a rule, quite specific to a particular host, and, so far as can be observed, perfectly harmless to it. If the relations between host and parasite had always been of this type in all cases, our knowledge of trypanosomes would be in a much more backward state even than it is. Of recent years a vast amount of attention has been attracted to these parasites owing to the diseases of man and animals caused by certain species of trypano- somes, and hence termed comprehensively " trypanosotniases." The greater number of these pathogenic species belong, from the structural point of view, to a type which may be called the brucii- type (Fig. 12) ; such are T. brucii, cause of tsetse-fly disease ; T. gam- biense, of sleeping sickness ; T. evansi, of surra ; T. equiperdum, of dourine ; and many others. The structural similarity of these species renders their identification a matter of extreme difficulty. Of a slightly different type is T. equinum, of " mal de caderas" in South America, with a very minute kinetonucleus ; but the recently- described T. hippicum of " murrina " (Darling, 428) appears to be a typical member of the ftrwcn-group. T. theileri, on the other hand, from cattle, is very distinct in size and appearance from the members of the ftracM-group. Finally, T. cruzi, the cause of human trypanosomiasis in Brazil, stands apart from all the others in peculiarities of reproduction and development, which have led to its being ranked in a distinct subgenus, Schizotrypanum. The problem of the pathogenic trypanosomes has been touched upon hi Chapter II. From a survey of trypanosomes in general, it is clear that the normal type of these parasites is one which is specific to one or to a limited number of species of hosts, to which it is quite harmless. The pathogenic species are to be regarded as aberrant forms not yet adapted to their hosts, as an instance of a disharmony in Nature. They are species which have probably established themselves but recently in the hosts to which they are pathogenic. As contrasted with the natural, non-pathogenic forms, their most striking peculiarities are that they are nonspecific to one host, but can flourish in a great number of different species of hosts, and that in susceptible animals their power of multiplication has no limit. T. brucii, so deadly to many domestic animals, is known to occur also as a natural parasite of wild animals, to which it is harmless. Structure. — The constitution of the trypanosome-body is of a very uniform type in its general traits, though subject to great variation in different cases as regards size, form, and minor details of structure. The body is typically long and sinuous, with the anterior end tapering gradually tcr a fine point, while the posterior extremity is usually broader, and tapers more abruptly, or ends bluntly ; but in different forms, even of the same species, there may 286 THE PROTOZOA be great variation, from long, slender to short, stumpy types, and in some cases the posterior end is also greatly drawn out and attenu- ated. The principal nucleus or trophonucleus is usually situated near the middle of the body. The kinetonucleus is almost invariably < behind the trophonucleus,* sometimes close behind it, but more usually near the posterior extremity, separated from the tropho- nucleus by about half the length of the body. The flagellum arises from a centriole (blepharoplast) which is in connection with the kinetonucleus. In the more primitive type of arrangement the blepharoplast is lodged within the kinetonucleus itself, and then the flagellum appears to arise from the kineto- nucleus directly (Wenyon, 84). In most cases, however, the blepharoplast is situated close beside, and usually in front of, the kinetonucleus, connected with it by a delicate rhizoplast. When the blepharoplast is distinct from the kinetonucleus, it is at present an open question whether the kinetonucleus contains a centriole of its own, in addition to the blepharoplast, or whether the blepharo- plast represents a centriole which belongs to the kinetonucleus, but has migrated to the exterior of this body. Passing from the blepharoplast to the surface of the body, the tlagellum forms the free border of the undulating membrane, which runs forward from the vicinity of the kinetonucleus to the extreme anterior end of the body as a fin-like ridge or fold of the periplast, of variable width (cf. Fig. 126). The flagellum may in some cases end with the undulating membrane at the anterior end of the body, but more usually it is prolonged forward beyond this point, so that a free portion of variable length is to be distinguished from the mar- ginal portion contained in the undulating membrane. The sinuous body, the undulating membrane, and the flagellum, are alike in a state of incessant movement during life, and in larger forms con- tractile myonemes are clearly visible in the periplast of the body (Fig. 28, p. 58) ; in the more minute individuals the presence of such elements must be inferred from their movements, but cannot always be demonstrated optically. The movements of a trypanosome, speaking generally, are of two types : travelling movements, when it progresses with the free flagellum forwards, sometimes very fast, shooting across the field of the microscope in a straight line (mouvement en fleche), sometimes, on the other hand, pushing its way s lowly through the blood-corpuscles, with the flagellum directed either forwards or backwards in movement ; and wriggling movements, when the animal writhes incessantly in serpentine contortions with little or no displacement * The only known exceptions are furnished by certain forms of the recently- described T. rhodesiense (vide Stephens and Fantham), and by some of the small forms seen during the multiplication of T. lewisi (Fig. 127, L). It is needless to point out that the statement made above applies to the typical trypanosome-form as found in the vertebrate blood, and not to the developmental forms through which they pass in the invertebrate host (crithidial and other types). from a given spot. Many trypanosomes, especi?lly the large stout forms, are very sluggish in their movements, and show but little power of progression. At the opposite extreme, in this respect, is the African parasite of cattle, well . named by Ziemann T. vivax, which, according to Bruce and his collaborators (411, iii.), " dashes across the field of the microscope with such rapidity that it is impossible to follow its movements, cyclone -like leaving a clear path, the corpuscles in its track having been flung on either side. If it remains at the same spot for a time, as it sometimes" does, it has an appearance of great energy and power, throwing the surrounding red blood- corpuscles about in wild confusion." In the foregoing paragraphs the terms " anterior " and " posterior," as applied to the trypanosome-body, have been used strictly with reference to its mode of progression. It is pointed out below, in the comparison with other types such as Trypanoplasma and Crithidia, that the extremity FIG. 126. — A, Trypanosoma tincce of the tench ; note the very broad undulating membrane in this species ; B, C, T. percce of the perch, slender and stout forms. After Minchin, X 2,000. of the body which is anterior, in the strictly morphological sense, in one species, may conceivably be posterior in another case. Hence some writers avoid the use of the words " anterior " and " posterior," and substitute for them " .flagellar " and " aflagellar " respectively, to denote the two poles of the body. There is as yet, however, no concrete evidence for regarding the flagellar extremity as morphologically posterior in any known species of trypanosome. The undulating membrane is to be regarded as a fold of the periplast or ectoplasm, into which the granular endoplasm may extend a short way in some cases ; it arises from the body along a line which is sometimes spoken of as " dorsal," an unnecessary refinement of terms. The free edge of the membrane, with its marginal flagellum, can be shown by direct measurements to exceed -considerably in length that portion of the body to which it is at- tached ; consequently its free edge is thrown into folds or pleats more or less marked. In preparations, trypanosomes are seen to lie, speaking generally, 288 THE PROTOZOA in one of the three ways ; a. certain number show the body extended nearly in a straight line, with the free edge of the membrane much pleated, but as a rule the body is curved, and then either with one principal bend, like a C, or with several S-like serpentine bends. In either case the undulating membrane is seen almost invariably to run on the convex side of each curve. In C-liko forms (Fig. 125, A) the membrane runs evenly along the outside of the principal curve, and the myonemes parallel to it. In S-like forms (Fig. 125, B) the membrane is often seen distinctly to be spirally twisted round the body, the myonemes also exhibiting the same twist. In life the undulating membrane performs, as its name implies, movements like those of a sail flapping in tho wind. Wave-like undulations run along it from one end to the other, but not always in the same direction ; it has been observed that reversals of the move- ments may take place, the waves first running in one direction for a time, and then suddenly undergoing a change and running in the opposite direction (Minchin and Woodcock, 42). Much confusion exists in the nomenclature of the parts of the trypanosome- body, more especially with regard to the small body for which Woodcock's term " kinetonucleus " (" Geisselkern ") is here used — a confusion due to differences of cytological interpretation. While it has never been doubted that the larger body (N.) is a true nucleus, various views have been held with regard to the smaller body (n.), which, summarized briefly, are as follows : The older writers regarded it merely as an organ of the peri pi as t from which the flagellum arose. Stassano and Bradford and Plimmer re- garded n. as a body of nuclear nature, and termed it the " micronucleus," comparing it with the similarly-named body of Infusoria. Laveran and Mesnil (464, 391), on the other hand, regarded ». as the " centrosome," the name by which it is generally known in France. Schaudinn (132) emphasized strongly its nuclear nature, and stated that n. was not a centrosome, but nevertheless used for it the term " blepharoplast," by which it is still generally known in Germany, although a true blepharoplast is a body of centrosomic nature. Moore and Breinl (484) reverted to the centrosomic view, and termed ». the " extranuclear centrosome," believing that it arose by division of the intranuclear centrosome contained in the principal nucleus (N.). Hart maim and Frowazek (63), on the basis of their nuclear theory of the centrosome (see Chapter VI., p. 95), regarded n. as a body both of nuclear and centrosomic nature, using for it the term " blepharoplast " ; so also Rosenbusch. Finally, Doflein (7), who is not convinced of its truly nuclear nature, continues to employ for n. the term " blepharoplast." With these many conflicting views with regard to the nature of n., the basal granule has been either ignored or overlooked, or considered as a mere " end- bead " of no particular importance, or ranked as a centriole, as it doubtless is. The nomenclature used here is based on the general theory that a eentrosome, or its equivalent, a blepharo- plast, is an achromatinic body of nuclear origin, but not equivalent to an entire nucleus, and on the conviction that n. is a true nucleus, and therefore is not to be regarded either as a centrosome or a blepharoplast. For a fuller dis- cussion of these points, see Robertson and Minchin (80). The trophonucjeus of a trypanosome is typically a vesicular nucleus con- taining a karyosome in which is lodged a centriole. The karyosome varies ia size in different species, and is sometimes double or multiple ; in T, granu- losum the smallest forms have a single karyosome which buds off others as the animal increases in size (Minchin, 478). By the method which is most in vogue, however, for making permanent preparations of trypanosomes— namely, the various modifications of the Romanowsky-stain — this structure is seldom to be made out, and the trophonucleus appears generally as an evenly-stained mass or as a dense clump of stained granules. It contains a centriole, difficult to make out in the resting condition, owing to its being embedded in the substance of the nucleus. . The kinetonucleus consists mainly of a mass of plastin impregnated with chromatin, staining very deeply, rounded, oval, or even rod-like in shape. According to Rosenbusch, the chromatinic mass of the kinetonucleus is to be regarded as representing THE H.EMOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 289 a karyosome, and it is surrounded by a space, sometimes purely virtual, which represents the nuclear vacuole, bordered by a delicate nuclear mem- brane, on or close to which the basal granule of the flagellum is lodged. In some species of the brucii-group, an axial filament, apparently a sup- porting structure of the nature of an axostyle, has been described (cf, Swel- lengrebel, 514). The system of fibrils, however, with which Prowazek decorates the trypanosome-body are probably artefacts (cf. Minchin, 479). Many trypanosomes contain granules in their cytoplasm which stain similarly to chromatin, so-called " chromatoid grains." According to Swel- lengrebel (514), they are of the nature of volutin (p. 68, supra). The division of a trypanosome is initiated, as a rule, by the division of the blepharoplast or basal granule of the flagellum, and following close on this a reduplication of the flagellum takes place, the exact method of which is disputed. In some cases the old flagellum appears to split ; in others the parent-flagellum remains unaltered, and a daughter-flagellum grows out from the daughter- blepharoplast. It is asserted by some that in all cases the new flagellum really arises as an independent outgrowth of a blepharoplast, and that the splitting of the old flagellum is only apparent, and due to the daughter-flagellum growing out at first in its sheath, from which it separates later (cf. Wenyon, 84). The division of the kinetonucleus follows hard on that of the blepharoplast, and next, as a rule, the trophonucleus divides. When the division of flagellum and nuclei is complete the body divides, begin- ning to do so at the flagellar end ; the two sister-trypanosomes are often connected for a time by the posterior extremities. The division of the kinetonucleus is a simple constriction into two ; that of the trophonucleus is of a simple type, in which first the centriole and then the karyosome divides. The two daughter-karyosomes travel apart, and the nucleus follows suit. The two daughter-nuclei sometimes remain connected for a time by a long centrodesmose, which is finally severed. Such, at least, is the mode of division of the two nuclei as it has presented itself to the majority of investigators, and the nuclear division of trypanosomes is to be regarded as amitotic, or at least not further advanced towards mitosis than that of Coccidium described above (p. 108, Fig. 51). According to Rosenbusch, however, the division of the nuclei, both trophic and kinetic, takes place by true mitosis. This author is in advance of his contemporaries upon this point, and his statements require independent confirmation before they can be accepted unreservedly, since in objects of such minuteness, requiring delicate and elaborate technique, imagination may all too readily outrun perception. Life-History. — The transmission of trypanosomes from the blood of one vertebrate host to another is effected, probably for every species of these parasites, by the agency of a blood-sucking inverte- brate of some kind. When the host is a terrestrial vertebrate, the transmitting agent is generally an insect, such as a mosquito or some biting fly or bug, or an ectoparasite of the host, such as a flea, lorise, or possibly a tick in some cases ; the trypanosomes of aquatic vertebrates, on the other hand, are transmitted by leeches in all cases that have been investigated. In addition to inoculative transmission (p. 24) of this kind, trypanosomes may pass directly from one vertebrate host to another during coitus ; this is known to occur in the case of the parasite of " dourine " in horses (T. equi- perdum), and has been suspected, but not proved, to take place in other cases also. It is also possible for the vertebrate to become infected by devouring animals containing living trypanosomes, 19 290 THE PROTOZOA whether it be the blood-sucking invertebrate, or possibly the flesh or organs of another vertebrate infected with trypaiiosomes. Two methods of inoculative transmission of trypanosomes have been distinguished ; in the one, known as the " direct " or " mechan- ical" method, the parasites merely become contained in or adhere to the proboscis of the blood-sucking intermediary when it sucks blood from an infected animal ; and when it feeds a second time the try- panosomes pass directly, and without having undergone any change or development, into the second host ; in the other, known as the " indirect " or " cyclical " method, the trypanosomes, when taken up by the blood-sucking invertebrate, go through a developmental cycle in it, at the end of which, but not before, they are " ripe " for inocu- lation into a suitable vertebrate host. Comparing natural with artificial processes of infection, in the direct method the blood- sucking invertebrate may be said to play the role merely of an injection-syringe, but in the indirect method it acts also as a culture- medium, in which the parasite passes through various phases and assumes forms quite different from those occurring in vertebrate blood. Patton (393) has put forward the view that transmission is always by the. direct method, and that the crithidial and other forms found in the blood-sucking invertebrate are parasites of the invertebrate alone, and have no connection with the trypanosomes found in vertebrates ; but the number of cases in which it has now been shown clearly that trypanosomes go through a definite cycle in the invertebrate host disproves Patton's contention, and renders it unnecessary to discuss it further. It is rather the direct method that stands in need of further demonstration ; though undeniably possible as a laboratory-experiment, it may be doubted if it ever really occurs in Nature, and in any case it is probably to be regarded as a purely accidental rather than a normal occurrence. It has been frequently asserted or assumed that trypanosomes can pass from parent to offspring, by so-called " hereditary trans- mission," in the invertebrate host, but convincing proof of this state- ment is as yet lacking entirely. Attempts to prove hereditary trans- mission by direct experiment have given, for the most part, negative results, and the observation so frequently made, that leeches, tsetse- flies, fleas, mosquitoes, etc., bred from the egg and not exposed to infection, are entirely free from parasitic flagellates, affords cumu- lative evidence against the existence of any such method of trans- mission (cf. Kleine and Taute, 459). Brumpt (419), however, asserts that T. inopinatum is transmitted hereditarily from parent to off- spring of the leech Helobdella algira. According to Porter (554), " Criihidia " melopkagia of the sheep-ked is also transmitted from parent to offspring in this insect ; and if, as is extremely probable, the flagellate in question is the developmental phase of the trypano- THE H^MOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 291 some of the sheep, it would furnish another instance of hereditary transmission. Hence' this mode of transmission must, apparently, be reckoned with in some instances, though it is evidently an ex- tremely rare phenomenon in trypanosomes generally. Just as a given species of trypanosome is, in Nature, capable of maintaining itself only in a particular species, or limited group of species, of vertebrate hosts, so it may be said, as a general vrule, that in transmission by the cyclical method the parasites are specific in the same way to certain invertebrate hosts, in which alone they are able to go through their full natural cycle. Amongst the many blood-sucking invertebrates which may prey upon the vertebrate, we may distinguish " right " and " wrong " hosts ; in the right host or hosts the parasite establishes itself more or less easily, and passes through a full and complete developmental cycle ; in the wrong host it either dies out immediately or goes through only a part of its cycle. The distinction between right and wrong hosts must not, however, be taken in an absolute sense, but as implying only that, amongst many possible hosts, there is one at least to which the parasites have become better adapted than to any other ; but the trypanosomes may sometimes succeed in maintaining themselves in other than the right host sufficiently long to pass back again into the vertebrate. Thus, in the case of the rat-trypanosome (T. lewisi) the right host is a rat-flea (Cerato- phyllus fasciatus, or possibly other species) ; but it may persist in the rat-louse (Hcematopinus spinulosus), and even pass from it, though rarely, back into the rat again. The following are a few well-established examples, in addition to that of T. lewisi already cited, of trypanosomes and their right hosts. Many pathogenic species of trypanosomes in Africa are transmitted by tsetse-flies — e.g., T. gambiense and T. vivax by Glossina palpalis, T. brucii by G. morsitans,* etc. The recently- described T. cruzi of Brazil was discovered in its invertebrate host, a blood-sucking hemipterous insect, Conorhinus megistus, before it was found in the blood of human beings. The trypanosomes of certain fresh-water fishes — namely, goldfish, perch, etc. — pass through their developmental cycle in the leech Hemiclepsis mar- ginata (Robertson, 503). T. raioe of skates and rays develops in the leech Pontobdella muricata (Robertson, 500, 502). The trypano- some of African crocodiles, T. grayi, develops in the tsetse-fly Glossina palpalis (Klein e, 458 ; Kleine and Taute, 459), and stages in its life-cycle have consequently been confused with those of T. gambiense in the same fly. The trypanosomes of birds are prob- ably transmitted for the most part by mosquitoes, but the details of * According to Taute, 0. morsitans can act as a true host for T. gambiense, and, conversely, according to Fischer, O. palpalis can do the same for T. brucii. 292 THE PROTOZOA their transmission have not yet been worked out in a satisfactory or conclusive manner. It must be considered for the present an open question whether true try- panosomcs occur as parasites of an invertebrate host exclusively ; the answer to the question will depend on the significance given to the expression " true trypanosome." It is now practically certain that many leptomonads have a trypaniform phase in their development (see p. 314, infra), so-called " lepto- trypanosomes." In Drosophila confusa, a non-biting, muscid fly, Chatton and Alilaire (compare also Chatton and Leger) found in the Malpighian tubules a trypaniform type of flagellate which they consider as a " eutrypanosome," as a species of Trypanosoma distinct from the Leptomonas occurring in the gut of the same fly (Fig. 137). Wenyon (84) also found similar forms in the Malpighian tubules of house-flies in Bagdad, and considered that they might belong to the cycle of the Leptomonas (Herpetomonas) in the same host. In both cases the phase in the Malpighian tubules is a little stumpy trypanosome- like form, very similar in its characters to T. nanum. The fact that these " eutrypanosomes " are so far known only to occur in flies which are infected also by a species of Leptomonas indicates that, like the " leptotrypanosomes/' they are merely a phase in the cycle of the Leptomonas. From the foregoing it is seen that the complete life-cycle of a trypanosome is an alternation of generations corresponding to an alternation of hosts. One part of the cycle is passed in the blood of a vertebrate, in which the predominant form is the trypanosome- type of flagellate ; the second part is passed in the digestive tract of an invertebrate, and here the predominant form is the crithidial or trypanomonad type. We may consider the life-history, therefore, under these two principal phases : 1. As a type of the life-cycle in the vertebrate host, that of the common rat-trypanosome may be taken. After infection, natural or artificial, of the rat, the trypanosomes make their appearance in the blood about the fifth, sixth, or seventh day. What the para- sites have been doing during this time, the so-called " incubation- period " in the rat, cannot as yet be stated definitely ; it may be that the relatively few trypanosomes inoculated by the flea or syringe have merely been multiplying steadily, in the manner presently to be described, until they become sufficiently numerous in the blood to be detected by microscopic examination ; there may, on the other hand, be phases of the parasite as yet unknown during this period, and, according to recent statements (Carini, 422), a process of schizogony takes place in the lung similar to that dis- covered by Chagas in Schizotrypanum cruzi (see below). When the trypanosomes first appear in the blood, their most striking peculiarity is the extraordinary diversity in type which they exihibit. Besides " ordinary " individuals of the normal dimensions of the " adult " form, there are others smaller or larger, the extremes of size being relatively huge in one direction, very minute in the other. These differences of size are due to the fact that the try- panosomes are multiplying actively, the large forms being those FIG. 12.7. — Various forms of multiplication in Trypanosoma lewisi from the blood of the rat. A, Trypanosome of the ordinary type ; B, small form resulting from division ; C, stage in equal binary fission ; the nuclei have divided and two fiagella arc present, but division of the body is beginning, and is indicated by a lighter streak down the middle of the body ; I), final stage of binary fission, which is complete except for a bridge of protoplasm, much drawu out, connecting the hinder ends of the two sister-trypanosomes ; E, form with hinder end drawn out (longocaudense type), the result of binary fission as seen in the last figure ; F, unequal binary fission of a large trypanosome ; 0, H, continued fission of the same type ; in 0 a parent and three daughter- individuals, in H a parent and seven daughter-individuals, can be distin- guished ; the parent-individual in each case is marked by the possession of a flagellum of the full normal length, while the daughter-individuals, formed by successive divisions, have flagella varying in length ; /, a small form, similar to B, but with the kinetonucleus in front of the trophonucleus ; J, binary fission of a form similar to / ; K, further division of a similar form producing a rosette of seven individuals still connected together. From preparations made by Dr. J. D. Thomson ; magnified 2,000 diameters. 294 THE PROTOZOA which are about to reproduce themselves by some form of fission, while the small forms are those which ha*re resulted from a recent act of reproduction. The multiplication of T, lewisi in the rat's blood takes various forms (Fig. 127). In some cases a trypanosome divides by equal binary fission (C, Z>), but this is comparatively rare. More usually the fission is markedly unequal, and of a multiple type. Small daughter-forms are 'split off from large parent -individuals, and usually many at a time; the nucleus of the parent- form divides several times, and subsequently the body divides into as many portions as there are nuclei, thus producing rosette -like forms (Fig. 127, F, O, H) in which the original parent can usually be distinguished by its long fiagellum from the small daughter -individuals with their flagella growing out. The small forms are sometimes set free with a crithidial type of struc- ture, the kinetonucleus in front of the trophonucleus (Fig. 127, L), and these immature forms may proceed to reproduce themselves rapidly again by either binary or multiple fission, in the latter case forming rosettes in which no large parent-form can be distinguished (Fig. 127. K ). A curious type of trypanosome found during the multiplication -period of T. lewisi is a form with the posterior end prolonged to a great length, so that it almost resembles a second flagellum (Fig. 127, E), and has sometimes been mistaken for such. This form has been described by Lingard as a dis- tinct species under the name T. longocaudense. These forms appear to arise by binary fission (Fig. 127, D) ; they are of constant occurrence and very numerous at a certain stage of the multiplication-period. The multiplication of T. lewisi in the rat's blood is most active from the eighth to the tenth day after infection, after which it is on the decline and gradually ceases. The relative number of forms of ordinary size increases steadily, while those of unusual dimen- sions, whether great or small, become continually scarcer, until about the twelfth or thirteenth day the trypanosomes, now usually present in vast numbers in the blood, are of uniform size and appearance, exhibiting, apart irom occasional abnormalities, indi- vidual variations only of a comparatively slight character ; and all multiplication has ceased 'entirely, never to recommence in the same host. The trypanosomes swarm in the blood of the rat for a certain time, which varies in different cases, but is usually one or two months. The infection of the rat is sometimes spoken of as " acute " when the trypanosomes are multiplying, and as " chronic " when multiplication has ceased, not, however,c very well-chosen terms, since the trypanosomes soon begin to diminish in number, and finally disappear altogether ; sometimes the diminution is very gradual and slow, sometimes it takes place with great rapidity. In either case the rat gets rid of its infection entirely sooner or later, without having suffered, apparently, any marked inconvenience from it,* and is then immune against a fresh infection with this species of tcypanosome. * Instances are on record of lethal epizootics of rats ascribed to T. lewisi ; but the proof that this parasite was really the cause of the disease is lacking. Under normal circumstances rats show no perceptible pathological symptoms whatever THE H^EMOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 295 A type of development in the vertebrate host contrasting in many points with that described in the foregoing paragraphs Is seen in T. cruzi (Pig. 128), the cause of human trypanosomiasis in Brazil. In this case the ordinary or adult forms of the trypanosome found in the* general circulation do not multiply there ; but the investigations of Chagas and of Hartmann have made known two types of multiplication which take place in the internal organs of the body. The first type of multiplication proceeds in the capillaries of the lung (Fig. 128, 6 — e). An adult trypanosome loses its flagellum, and in some cases its kinetonucleus also ; its body then becomes rounded off into an oval mass ; the trophonucieus, and also the kinetonucleus, if present, multiply by sue cessive divisions to form eight nuclei of each kind ; and finally the body divides within its own periplast into eight' minute daughter- individuals, so- "called " merozoites." The merozoites are stated to exhibit a dimorphism FIG. 128. — Phases of T. (Schizotrypanum) cruzi jn vertebrate blood, a, The two forms of the adult trypanosome, " male " (upper) and " female " (lower), from human blood ; 6, preparations for schizogony ; c, schizont ; d, division of the nucleus of the schi/ont ; e, division of the schizont into eight merozoites ; /, mcrozoite in a blood-corpuscle ; g, intracorpuscular phase in late stage of growth ; h, similar phase escaping from a corpuscle, the flagellum not yet formed ; i, similar phase, the flagellum in process of formation. Stages 6 — e are found in the lung, the others in the peripheral blood. After Chagas (425). which Chagas regards as sexual ; those produced by trypanosomes which retained their kinetonucleus have both trophic and kinetic nuclei and a rudiment of a flagellum (male forms) ; those derived from trypanosomes which lost both flagellum and kinetonucleus have only a trophonucieus (female forms) ; in the latter case the single nucleus divides into two unequal parts, of which the smaller becomes the new kinetonucleus, and a flagellum is formed subsequently. • In either case the merozoites penetrate into blood- f rom even the most swarming infection with T. leioisi (for the action of the " ten- forces " strains see p. 28). Those who study habitually the lethal species of trypanosomes often display a natural bias, not in the least justified, to assume that a similar virulence is an inseparable attribute of all other species of these parasites. If that were so, it would be necessary to consider practically every specimen of pike, bream, perch, or tench, in the Norfolk Broads, for instsnce, to be in a diseased condition. 296 THE PROTOZOA corpuscles, and so pass into the general circulation. Within the corpuscle they grow into the adult form, which is finally set free from the corpuscle as a trypanosome of normal structure. The adult trypanosome (Fig. 128, a), swimming freely in the blood- plasma, may either be taken up by the inverte- brate host in which it develops, or may repeat the process of multiplication by schizogony. The second type of multiplication was first described by Hartmann from hypertrophied endothelial cells of the lung ; Chagas (426) has since found it in the tissues of the body, more especially in the cardiac muscle, central nervous system, and striped muscle. In this type the parasite is intracellular , and has the appearance and structure of a Leishmania (cf. Fig. 138), a rounded body containing a trophonucleus and a kinetonucleus, but no flagcllum or undulating membrane. On account of its power of multiplication by schizogony, Chagas has made T. cruzi the type of a special genus, Schizotrypanum ; the type of multiplication observed in the lung-capillaries is not essentially different, however, from that of T. leioisi in the blood, except for its alleged sexual dimorphism ; and, accord- ing to Carini (424), similar processes of schizogony occur in other trypanosomes The intracellular multiplication in the tissues, however, recalls strongly that of the parasite of kala-azar (see p. 316, infra). Schizotrypanum thus forms an important link between a typical blood-trypanosome, such as T. lewisi, and a tissue-parasite, such as the species of Leishmania, in which the free trypanosome-phase no longer exists, apparently. Chagas considers the multiplication of Schizotrypanum cruzi in the tissues as non-sexual, and serving to increase the number of parasites in the host, but that which takes place in the lung- capillaries as a process of gametogony whereby the sexually differentiated adult forms are produced. His grounds for this interpretation are, first, that in human blood the adult trypanosomes exhibit a dimorphism rarely found in guinea-pigs infected artificially, in which also schizogony in the lung is seldom observed ; secondly, that the invertebrate host, Conorhinus, is always rendered infective if fed directly on infected human blood, but very rarely becomes infective if fed on guinea-pigs, even when these animals show an intense infection. He suggests that the greater resistance of the human organism to the parasite stimulates the production of sexual forms which the trypanosome may cease to produce in a less resistant host. In the more familiar pathogenic species, such as T. brucii, T. gambiense, etc., the development in the vertebrate host takes the form mainly of continued multiplication by binary fission simply. Reproduction of this kind may pro- ceed until tne trypanosomes swarm in the blood ; or, on the contrary, the trypanosomes may be at all times relatively few in number, even when fatal to their host. T. brucii, for example, may produce in different hosts an acute or a chronic form of disease ; in the latter case the infected animal may live a long time, and the parasite exhibits very limited powers of multi- plication. The behaviour of the parasite in the natural hosts to which it is harmless has not been studied. In many pathogenic species, periods of multiplicative activity, during which the trypanosomes are abundant, alternate with periods during which the parasites pass into a resting condition in the internal organs, and become scarce or disappear in the general circulation. In this phase they are alleged to lose their fiagellum, diminish in size, and become small, rounded " latent- bodies," which, according to Moore and Breinl (484), have only a single nucleus ; but according to Fantham they are Leishmania-like, with distinct tropho- nucleus and kinetonucleus. From resting stages of this kind the activs trypanosomes are developed again. Laveran (462), however, denies that there is a non-flagellated stage of development in the vertebrate host, and considers that the elements described as "latent bodies" represent involution-stages of the parasites — that is to say, forms which have become deformed in structure owing to unfavourable conditions, but not to such an extent as to be incapable of recovery if the conditions improve. THE ILEMOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 297 In the vast majority of trypanosomes in their natural hosts, such as birds, fishes, etc., the mode of multiplication and the developmental cycle remains a mystery, although the sizes of the individual trypanosomes and their numbers are observed to vary at different times in the same host. Considerable light has been thrown upon this question by the recent investigations of Machado upon the multiplication of Trypanosoma rotator ium of frogs, a species re- markable for the polymorphism it exhibits. The results obtained by Machado may be summarized briefly as follows : Trypanosomes of any size may divide by binary fission when free in the blood (supposed " non-sexual " reproduction). On the other hand, trypanosomes of large size may become rounded, flattened, leaf -like forms, losing 'their flagellum ; such forms undergo a process of schizogony in the internal organs, chiefly in the liver or kidneys, sometimes in the spleen, sometimes even in the circulating blood. The kinetonucleus approaches the trophonucleus, and may (1) remain distinct from it, so-called " male " type ; or (2) may pass into the trophonucleus, in which the karyo- some breaks up to form a small secondary karyosome ; the kinetonuclear karyosome then fuses with, or becomes closely adherent to, the secondary trophonuclear karyosome — so-called " female " type. A multiplication of the nuclei then takes place : in the " male " type by independent divisions of the kinetonucleus and trophonucleus ; in the " female " type by divisions of the single mass formed by fusion of the kinetonuclear and trophonuclear karyosomes, followed by budding off of small nuclei from the originally single nucleus. Thus the body of the rounded-off trypanosome becomes filled, within its periplast, with nuclei varying in number from five to seven- teen ; then round each nucleus ("female ") or each pair of dissimilar nuclei (" male ") the protoplasm becomes condensed to form as many merozoites, which are finally set free by rupture of the periplast. The merozoites of " male " type develop a flagellum ; in those of " female " type the single nucleus divides into two nuclei of unequal size, a larger trophonucleus and a smaller kinetonucleus, and from the latter a basal granule is budded off from which the flagellum grows out (Fig. 30, G). In either case the mero- zoites (which may divide further after being liberated from the parent body) become transformed finally into the smallest forms of trypanesomes, which then grow up into the larger forms found in the blood. Machado' s observa- tions of fact, apart from his theoretical interpretations, explain the many different forms found in the frog's blood, which have recently been studied in detail by Lebedew ; compare also Mathis and Leger. In other cases there may be three well-marked types of form — long and slender, short and stumpy, and intermediate or indifferent forms, as in T. gambiense (Fig. 12 ; cf. Minchin, 477, Hindle, 450, Bruce, 405) ; or there may be every gradation in size from small to large forms, as in T. granvlosum of the eel (Fig. 129) ; or, finaDy, the trypanosomes may be practically uniform in size and structure, as in T. lewisi after the multiplication- period, T. vivax, etc. A satisfactory explanation of the polymorphism has not been found in all cases ; the various forms may be in some instances stages of growth related to multiplication, as in T; lewisi during the multiplication-period ; in other cases the polymorphism — for example, of T. gambiense — may be sexual differentiation which is related to the subsequent development in the in- vertebrate host ; a third possibility is that in some cases the propagative forms, destined for multiplication in the invertebrate host, are differentiated from the other forms found in the vertebrate host, as in T. noctuce (Minchin and Woodcock, 42). Different explanations must probably be sought in different cases. 2. The cycle in the invertebrate host always takes place entirely or mainly in the digestive tract, though the extent to which this region is invaded varies greatly. In the development of T. lewisi in the flea the parasites pass down as far as the rectum, and there 298 THE PROTOZOA undergo the principal phase of their cycle. In the development of the trypanosomes of fresh-water fish in the leech Hemiclepsis, the parasites do not pass farther back than the crop (Robertson, 503). Finally, in the many species of pathogenic trypanosomes which are transmitted by tsetse-flies of various species, two types of develop- mental cycle can be distinguished : in the one, the parasite invades Fia. 129. — Trypanosoma granulosum of the common eol : four different sizes, probably stages of growth. After Minchin (478), x 2,000. the whole alimentary canal of the* fly ; in the other it undergoes the greater part of its development iir the proboscis and pharynx alone. The details of the developmental cycle in the invertebrate host are very inadequately known, and have only been studied in a very few instances. As a rule the characteristic form of this part of the lif e-history is a crithidial or trypanomonad type, repre- THE H^MOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 299 senting the principal multiplicative phase in the invertebrate host ; it is a form in which the kinetonucleus is placed in front of, or close beside, the trophonucleus, and in which, consequently, the undu- lating membrane is confined to the anterior region of the body, and may be quite rudimentary. As- a rule the body of the trypano- monad is shorter, stiffer, more pear-shaped, than in the typical try- panosome-form ; no longer sinwous and flexible, it is held straight and rigid in progression, which is effected almost entirely by the flagellum. In many cases, however, the free flagellum is very short, and used to attach the organism to the lining of the digestive tract. Besides the trypanomonad form, the developmental cycle may also include many other types of form, and often exhibits a degree of polymorphism which is most bewildering, and compared to which the diversity of form seen in the vertebrate host is but slight. Taking the development of T. lewisi in the rat-flea as a typical example, the parasites when taken up by the flea pass with the ingested blood into the stomach (mid-gut) of the insect. In this part they multiply actively in a peculiar manner, not as yet de- scribed in the case of any other trypanosome in its invertebrate host (Fig. 130) ; they penetrate into the cells of the epithelium, and in that situation they grow to a very large size., retaining their flagellum and undulating membrane, and exhibiting active metabolic changes in the form of the body, which in early stages of the growth is doubled on itself in the hinder region, thus becoming pear-shaped or like a tadpole in form, but later is more block-like or rounded. During growth the nuclei multiply, and the body when full-grown approaches a spherical form, and becomes divided up within its own periplast into a number of daughter-individuals, which writhe and twist over each other like a bunch of eels within the thin envelope enclosing them. When this stage is reached, the flagellum, which hitherto hfcd been performing active movements and causing the organism to rotate irregularly within the cell, disappears altogether, and the metabolic movements cease ; the body becomes almost perfectly spherical, and consists of the periplast-envelopa within which a number of daughter-trypanosomes are wriggling very actively ; the envelope becomes more and more tense, and finally bursts with explosive suddenness, setting free the flagellates, usually about eight in number, within the host-cell. The products of this method of multiplication are full-sized trypanosomes, complete in their structure, and differing but slightly in their characters from those found in the blood of the rat. They escape from the host-cell into the lumen of the stomach. To the intracellular multiplicative phase in the stomach a crithidial phase in the rectum succeeds (Fig. 131 . In the fully- established condition the rectal phase consists of small pear-shaped 300 THE PROTOZOA forms with the flagellum very short, in some cases projecting scarcely at all from the body at its pointed end. These forms are found attached by means of their flagella, often in vast numbers, to the wall of the rectum, sometimes also in the intestinal or pyloric region ; they multiply by binary fission, and form a stock, as it were, of the parasites, which persists for a long time in the flea — probably, under favourable conditions, for the whole life of the insect. Experi- ments have shown that a flea once rendered infective to rats can Fia. 130. — Trypanosoma lewisi: developmental phases from the stomach of the rat-flea. 0, Ordinary form from the blood of the rat ; A — F, intracellular stages : A, a trypanosome curled on itself ; B, similar form in which the body has become rounded ; C, multiplication beginning, division of kinetonucleus and trophonucleus, daughter-flagellum growing out ; D, further stage — three nuclei of each kind, two short daughter-flagella, and a long parent-flagellum wrapped round the body ; E, six nuclei of each kind, five daughter-flagella, parent-flagellum wrapped round the body ; F, eight nuclei of each kind, the daughtcr-fiagella running parallel with the parent-flagellum ; O, the type of trypanosome resulting from the process of multiplication seen in the fore- going figures ; this is the form which passes down the intestine into the rectum. Magnified 2,000. N.B. — The drawings in this figure and in Fig. 131 are made from prepara- tions fixed wet with Schaudinn's fluid and stained with iron-haematoryiin ; in such preparations the trypanosomes always appear appreciably smaller than in films stained with the Romano wsky-stain (see Minchin, 479) ; con- sequently these figures, though drawn to the same magnification as Figs. 11, 127, etc., are on a slightly smaller scale ; compare the trypanosome drawn in O with those in Figs. 11, A, and 127, A. remain so for at least three months, without being reinfected. From the rectal stock trypaniform individuals arise by a process of modification of the crithidial forms, in which the flagellum grows in length, the anterior portion of the body becomes more drawn out, the kinetonucleus migrates backwards behind the trophonucleus, taking with it the origin of the flagellum, and an undulating mem- THE HJEMOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 301 brane running the length of the body is established. The trypani- form individuals thus formed are of small size and broad, stumpy form ; they represent the propagative phase which passes from the flea back into the rat. From the rectum they pass forwards into the stomach, and from the stomach they appear to be regurgitated into the rat's blood when the flea feeds. Experiments show that the flea becomes infective to the rat in about six days after it first took up the trypanosomes from an infected rat. The intracellular phase is at the height of its develop- ment about twenty-four hours after the flea takes up the trypano- somes ; the rectal phase begins to be established towards the end of FIG. 131. — Trypanosoma lewisi: developmental phases from the rectum of the rat- flea. A, Early rectal form ; B, crithidial form attached to wall of rectum ; G, D, division of crithidial form ; E, clump of crithidial forms detached from wall of rectum, hanging together by their ilagella, one of them beginning to divide ; F, 0, H, crithidial forms without free flagella ; /, rounded form Without flagellum ;J,K, L, M, series of forms transitional from the crithidial to the final trypaniform type ; N, the last stage in the flea. Magnified 2,000. the first or beginning of the second day ; and the stumpy, trypani- form, propagative phase is developed in the rectum towards the end of the fifth day. The account of the development of T. lewsi in the flea given in the fore- going paragraphs is based upon investigations, some of them as yet unpub- lished, can^d on in conjunction with Dr. J. D. Thomson by the author (480-482). Some of the phases of the parasite have also been described by Swellengrebel and Strickland (517). A number of investigators — namely, Prowazek (497), Breinl and Hindle, Baldrey (396), Rodenwaldt, and others — have studied the development of this trypanosome in the rat-louse (Hcemato- pinua spinulosus). Experiments have shown that this insect is also capable of transmitting the trypanosome from rat to rat, but only, to judge from the 302 THE PROTOZOA published results, in rare instances, in striking contrast with the ease with which the transmission is effected by the rat-flea. The rat-louse may be regarded, therefore, as a host in which the trypanosome establishes itself only exceptionally, and by no means as the host to which it is best adapted. Crithidial and other forms have been seen in the louse, but the intracellular phase has not been observed, and it is probable that most of the forms de- scribed from this host are degenerating forms maintaining a feeble and pre- carious existence under adverse conditions, and destined to die off and dis- appear sooner or later. The developmental cycle of Schizotrypanum cruzi in the bug Conorhinua Tnegiatus has been described by Chagas,* and is briefly as follows (Fig. 132) : h Fia. 132. — Phases of Schizotrypanum cruzi in the bug Conorhinus megistus. a, 6, and c, Forms transitional from the ordinary trypanosomes to the rounded forms ; d, clump of rounded forms ; e and /, change of rounded into crithidial forms ; g and h, crithidial forms ; i, trypaniform type from the salivary glands ; /, encapsuled form from the intestine. After Chagas (425). The trypanosomes taken up by the bug into its stomach change in about six hours ; they lose their flagellum and contract into rounded, Leishmania- like forms, which multiply actively by fission. After a time multiplication ceases, and the rounded forms become pear-shaped, develop a flagellum at the pointed end, and change into typical crithidial forms which pass on into the intestine, and there multiply by fission. In this way the characteristic condition of the infected bug is produced, with the intestine containing a swarm of trypanomonad individuals multiplying actively. The final stage in the insect is a small trypaniform type which is found in the body-cavity and salivary glands, whence it doubtless passes into a vertebrate host again. * A critical summary and review of the memoir of Chagas is given by Minohin in Nature, vol. Ixxxiv., pp. 142-144 (August 10. 1910), with three text-figures. THE H^EMOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 303 The three principal phases in the development of T. cruzi in the bug may be compared, without difficulty, with those of T. lewisi in the flea, though differing in minor details ; in both cases an early multiplicative phase in the stomach is followed by a crithidial phase, also multiplicative and constituting the principal stock of the parasite, in the hinder part of the digestive tract ; to this succeeds a propagative trypanifonn phase, which in the case of T. lewisi passes forwards to the stomach, but which in the case of T. cruzi appears to pass through the wall of the alimentary canal into the body- cavity, and so into the salivary glands. Other developmental forms have been described by Chagas, but their relation to the cycle of the parasite, if indeed they really belong to it, is not clear. The developmental cycle of the trypanosomes of fresh- water fishes in the leech Hemidepsis marginata (Robertson, 503) begins also by active multi- plication in the crop about six to nine hours after the flagellates have been ingested. The trypanosomes divide by repeated binary fission of unequal type, budding off small individuals which are crithidial in type and multiply in their turn. In a few days the crop is populated by a swarm of trypano- monad forms of various sizes, multiplying actively. Towards the end of the digestion, the propagative phase begins to appear in the form of long, slender trypaniform individuals which arise directly from the crithidial forms, and pass forwards in great numbers from the crop into the proboscis-sheath, whence they are inoculated by the leech into a fresh host. A certain number of the crithidial forms remain behind in the crop, however, where during hunger- periods they may pass into a resting Leishmania-form ; when the crop is again filled with fresh blood, these forms begin to multiply again, repopulating the crop with crithidial forms, from which a fresh batch of trypaniform propagative individuals arise towards the end of digestion again. In the development of T. raice in the leech Pontobdella muricata (Robertson, 500, 502), the ingested trypanosomes multiply in the crop in a similar manner by unequal binary fission, budding off small individuals which, however, are rounded and leishmanial in type, and which pass down from the crop into the intestine, where they develop a flagellum, become crithidial in type, and multiply actively. During hunger- periods they become leishmanial, resting forms which persist when all other forms have succumbed and died out, becom- ing crithidial again when the supply of food is renewed. From the crithidial forms arise the long, slender trypaniform individuals of the propagative phase, which pass forward into the proboscis to be inoculated into the fish. The development of T. vittatce, from the blood of the Ceylon tortoise, Emyda vittata, in the leech GlossipJionia sp., is of a similar type, but takes place almost entirely in the crop (Robertson, 501). The development of T. gambiense in the tsetse-fly, Olossina pcdpalis, so far as it has been described by Kleine (457), Kleine and Taute (459), and Bruce and his collaborators (415), presents some peculiar features not quite intelli- gible at present. The whole development takes a long time, about eighteen to twenty-five days or more, a fact which, together with the low percentage of. flies which become infected, accounts for the existence of a developmental cycle having been missed by so many investigators, until it was first dis- covered by Kleine. Prom five to seven days after the infection of the fly the trypanosomes disappear or become scarce in its digestive tract, indicating, possibly, an intracellular stage yet to be discovered. Later, in a small percentage of the flies, the trypanosomes reappear in the digestive tract in enormous numbers. The flagellates at this stage vary greatly in size, form, and appearance, but crithidial forms are stated to be very rare, a feature in which the development contrasts with the usual type seen in other trypano- somes. Finally an invasion of the salivary glands takes place, though in what way it is brought about is not clear ; short, stumpy trypanifonn individuals are found in the glands, which represent the ripe, propagativ* phase destined to be inoculated into the vertebrate host. These ripe forms first make their appearance, according to Kleine, in the intestine. 304 THE PROTOZOA In many species of trypanosomes transmitted by tsetse-flies, a peculiar mode of development occurs, as already stated, in the proboscis, termed by Roubaud, who discovered it, a culture d'attente. The trypanosomes taken up from the vertebrate change very rapidly into trypanomonad ("leptomonad," Roubaud) forms, with the kinetonucleus far forward, and attach themselves by the tip of the flagellum to the wall of the proboscis tube. In this situation they multiply in the salivary fluid by binary fission, until great numbers are present. In some cases this culture in the proboscis appears to be the sole form of developmental cycle in the fly, as, for example in T. cazalboui (Roubaud, 506, Bouffard), T. vivax (Bruce, 411, iii.) ; this type is termed by Roubaud evolution par fixation directe. In other species (T. dimorphon, T. pecaudi) the parasite multiplies first in the digestive tract of the fly, and then spreads forward into the proboscis — evolution par fixation indirecte of Roubaud ; in this case, however, the possibility does not seem to be excluded that the forms seen in the digestive tract may have belonged to the developmental cycle of a distinct trypanosome. Development of this kind has only been observed in tsetse-flies. According to Bouffard, T. cazalboui can be transmitted mechanically by Stomoxys, but goes through its developmental cycle only in the proboscis of Glossina palpalis ; Stomoycys may therefore cause epidemics of the disease (" souma "), but endemic areas are always in regions where G. palpalis occurs. The tsetse-fly is not infective until six days after first feeding on an infected animal, and it then remains infective permanently, or at least for the greater part of its existence. Hence the proboscis- cycle is a rapid develop- ment, comparable, as regards the time it requires, to that of T. letmsi in the flea rather than to that of other trypanosomes in the digestive tract of the tsetse. Finally,* mention must be made of the cysts of T. grayi, described by Minchin (476), occurring in the hind-gut of Glossina palpalis. The cysts result from the encystment of a crithidial form, and are very similar to the cysts of Herpetomonas, described by Prowazek (Pig. 124), from the hind-gut of the house-fly ; their mode of formation indicates that they are destined to pass out of the rectum to the exterior with the faeces, and Minchin has suggested that a contaminative method of spreading the infection may occur in addition to the usual inoculative method. The possibility must be reckoned with, however, that the cysts in question may be part of the cycle of a distinct flagellate parasite, perhaps peculiar to the fly alone, and may not belong at all to the life- cycle of T. grayi, which has now been shown to be the developmental form of the trypanosome of the crocodile (cf. Cystotrypanosama, Roubaud, 557'5). According to Kleine and Taute, trypanosomes, not encysted, may be found in the faeces of infected tsetses. Apart from the somewhat aberrant development of the members of the ftntcw-group, which require further elucidation, the cycle of a trypanosome in the invertebrate host appears to consist typically of three principal phases : (1) An initial multiplicative phase, which may be trypanifonn, as in T. lewisi, or Leishmania - like, as in T. cruzi, or may take the form of unequal division of large trypani- form individuals to produce either small crithidial forms directly, as in fish-trypanosomes in the leech Hemiclepsis, or rounded Leishmania-forma which later become crithidial, as in T. raice and T. vittacet ; to this initial phase succeeds (2) a crithidial phase, which may pass farther down the alimentary canal, and which in any case multiplies by fission and constitutes the principal stock of the * The development described by Schaudinn (132) for T. noctuce is dealt with in a subsequent chapter (p. 390). parasite, keeping up the infection of the invertebrate host. In hunger-periods the flagellates may persist as simple, rounded, Leishmania-like forms. Sooner or later many, it may be the greater number, but not all, of the crithidial forms become modified into the trypaniform individuals, which represent (3) the propagative phase of the parasite, and pass forwards to be inoculated into the verte- brate host. Those crithidial forms which do not become trans- formed into the propagative individuals remain to multiply and replenish the stock. A very much debated question in this development is that relating to the occurrence of sexual phases and syngamy, which, purely on the analogy of the malarial parasites, are assumed almost universally to occur in the invertebrate host. Not in a single instance as yet, however, has the sexual act been proved satisfactorily to take place in the development of trypano- somes. The fertilization described by Schaudinn (132) in " T. noctuce " is the well-known conjugation of Halteridium, which can be observed without difficulty ; and though Schaudinn described so-called "male " and " female " types of trypanosomes in the mosquito, he expressly stated that they did not and could not conjugate. The process of syngamy described by Prowazek (497) for T. lewisi in the rat-louse, though " confirmed " by Baldrey (396), Gonder (445*5), and Bodenwaldt, is almost certainly the agglomeration of degenerating forms (Swellengrebel, 516 ; compare Keichenow, 78, p. 268). Less biassed investigators, who have studied the developmental cycle of trypanosomes with great care, such as Chagas, Robertson, and others, have been quite unable to observe sexual processes of any kind. .The liability to error in the interpretation of observations is greatly increased, first by the fact that trypanosomes divide longitudinally and often unequally, secondly by the phenomena of agglomeration (p. 128), which occur readily under un- favourable conditions. Consequently the adhesion together of two trypano- somes may be due to quite other causes than sexual affinity. In some cases the alleged occurrence of syngamy has been based merely on the fact that non- flagellated forms have been seen, which, on the analogy of the malarial parasites (p. 362), are termed " ookinetes " and interpreted as zygotes. It is certainly remarkable, in view of the paucity of data, that so many investigators, following Schaudinn's lead, should persist in ascribing all form- differentiation in trypanosomes to sex, and should be unable, apparently, to conceive of any other cause of polymorphism in parasites which have to adapt themselves, in the course of their life-cycle, to a great diversity of conditions (compare also Doflein, 430). It must be emphasized that the only true criterion of sexual polymorphism is sexual behaviour, and until that has been established it is premature to speak of sexual differentiation. Some investigators have upheld the unfashionable view that the syngamy of trypanosomes occurs in the vertebrate host ; so Bradford and Plimmer, aud more recently Ottolenghi, who has described in T. brucii, T. ecpiinnm, T. gambiense, and T. equiperdum, the following process of sexual conjugation : Two trypanosomes of very different size and appearance attach themselves to one another by their hinder ends. One, regarded as the microgamete, is more slender, and contains one trophonucleus or a larger nucleus of this kind and two smaller (reduction-nuclei) ; the other, the macrogamete, is much larger, and contains also a larger nucleus near the kinetonucleus and two or more other nuclei in process of degeneration. The macrogamete also has usually three, sometimes two or four, flagella and undulating membranes. After the two gametes have united by their hinder ends, a small nucleus is budded off from the principal nucleus of the microgamete, passes over into the body of the macrogamete, and fuses with its principal nucleus. Subsequently the microgamete appears to degenerate, and the fertilized macrogamete to 306 THE PROTOZOA divide up into trypanosomes of the ordinary type. Those who consider that syngamy can only occur in the invertebrate host will doubtless regard the process described by Ottolenghi as phenomena of agglomeration and de- generation. In the present state of our knowledge, however, it is best to keep an open mind on this question, and to await further investigations. In T. gambiense, Moore and Breinl (484) have described a process of fusion between the kinetonucleus and trophonucleus in the formation of the " latent bodies," and have interpreted this as a sexual process, a suggestion hardly to be taken seriously. A similar process alleged to occur in the multiplication - forms of T. lewisi has been interpreted by Schilling as the inevitable autogamy. All that can be said at present, with regard to sexual processes in trypano- somes, is that, on the analogy of other Protozoa generally, syngamy may be expected to occur in some part of the life- cycle. It remains, however, for further research to establish definitely the conditions under which syngamy takes place, and the nature of the process in these organisms ; nor can it be considered as sound reasoning, in the absence of concrete observations, to at- tempt to limit the possible occurrence of syngamy, or to infer the exact form it takes, either by analogies more or less far-fetched with one or another group of Protozoa, or by the mere existence of form-differentiation, and still less by the arbitrary interpretation of certain forms as zygotes or ookinetes. A very variable feature in the development of trypanosomes is the sus- ceptibility of the invertebrate host. In the case of T. lewisi, only about 20 per cent., approximately, of the fleas fed experimentally on infected rats become infective in their turn, and in the case of tsetse-flies and pathogenic trypanosomes the percentage is much smaller. There are also grounds for suspecting that a certain condition or phase of the trypanosome in the blood of the vertebrate is sometimes necessary for establishing the developmental cycle in the invertebrate ; compare the observations and conclusions of Chagas with regard to Schizotrypanum cruzi, mentioned above (p. 296). In Trypano- soma noctuce the summer form which appears in the blood is of a type distinct from the winter forms found in the bone-marrow (Minchin and Woodcock, 42). On the other hand, in the case of the trypanosomes of fresh- water fishes, Robert- son (503) found that every leech became infected that was fed on an infected fish ; so that the simplest method of determining whether a fish was infected was to feed a newly-hatched Hemidepsis on it. A question often discussed is whether trypanosomes in any part of their development may pass through " ultramicroscopic " stages. Schaudinn (132) expressed the opinion that some stages of trypanosomes investigated by him were small enough to pass through bacterial filters ; though he did not put this suggestion to an experimental test, it is often quoted as a proved fact.* Moore and Breinl (484) also asserted, without experimental data, that infected blood remained infective after filtration. On the other hand, attempts by Bruce and Bateman to obtain experimental verification of these statements gave negative results (compare also Report XI., p. 122, of the Sleeping Sickness Commission). Recently it has been asserted by Fry that T. brucii can throw off granules which, when liberated, possess a certain motility of their own in the blood ; this process is regarded as " essentially of a vital and not a degenerative nature." That a trypanosome or any other living cell might excrete grains which when set free could exhibit movements due to molecular or other causes is highly probable ; but that such grains represent a stage in the life- history of a trypanosome is far from being so ; nor can analogy with spiro- chaetes be considered as a legitimate argument in favour of any such con- clusion. There remains for consideration the development which trypanosomes undergo in artificial cultures, in which they exhibit a series of forms quite different from those seen in the blood of the vertebrate, and so far resembling the cycle in the invertebrate host in that the predominant phase is a crithidial * It is doubtful whether the forms of which Schaudinn made this statement were really trypanosomes or spirochsetes. THE H^EMOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 307 or trypanomonad type of flagellate. Until the cultural development of a trypanosome has been compared in detail with its natural development in the invertebrate host, it is impossible to estimate precisely the bearing of the cultural series of stages from the point of view of the physiology and mor- phology of the parasite. The only investigator who has attempted this is Chagas (425), who found in cultures of Schizotrypanum cruzi the same three principal phases — namely, rounded, crithidial, and trypaniform — that occui in the natural cycle, and in the same order of sequence. At present, therefore, it would be unprofitable to discuss in detail the series of forms occurring in artificial cultures, and it must suffice to refer the reader for further infor- mation to the principal works on the subject, namely, those of Novy and McNeal (489), Bouet, Franca (438, 443), Rosenbusch, Thomson (525), Wood- cock (527), Lebedew, and Doflein (431). As already pointed out above, the cultural method is often of the greatest practical value in determining whether, in a given case, an animal is infected with trypanosomes or not. Lebedew has described what he believes to be syngamy in the cultural phases of T. rotatorium ; compare also the account of Leishmania below (p. 319). The genus Trypanosoma comprises a vast number of species, parasitic in the blood of animals throughout the vertebrate series ; and several attempts have been made to subdivide and classify FIG. 133. — Endotrypanum schaudinni from the blood of Chotcepus didactylus. A — E, Various forms of the intracorpuseular parasite ; F, trypanosome from the blood of the same host. After Mesnil and Brimont, magnified about x 1,600 diameters. this comprehensive genus into smaller groups. Such attempts have either taken the course of splitting off particular forms, char- acterized by some special peculiarity, from the main group, or of subdividing the group as a whole on some principle of morphology or development. An example of the first method is tfle foundation by Chagas (425) of the genus Schizotrypanum, as already mentioned, for T. cruzi, on the ground that it multiplies by schizogony and possesses intracorpuscular phases. The genus Endotrypanum was proposed by Mesnil and Brimont for a peculiar form which was discovered by them within the red blood-corpuscles of a sloth (Cholcepus didactylus}, and which is very probably an intracorpus- cular phase of a trypanosome found free in the blood-plasma of the same host. The life-cycle of Endotrypanum is not yet known. Chagas considers it not improbable that it should be placed in the 308 THE PROTOZOA same genus as T. cruzi, in which case the name Endotrypanum has the priority over Schizotrypanum. In the present state of know- ledge, data are lacking for deciding how far it is possible to employ either multiplication by schizogony or an intracorpuscular habitat as characters for defining genera of trypanosomes, An intra- corpuscular habitat is probably commoner in trypanosomes than has usually been supposed. It has been described quite recently by Buchanan in T. brucii. Attempts to subdivide the genus Trypanosoma as a whole have bsen based on the possibility that the trypanosome-type of structure may have had two distinct phylogenetic origins, one through Leptomonas and Crithidia from a cercomonad ancestor, the other through Trypanoplasma from a heteromastigote or Bodonid type. The trypanosome-form might be imagined to have arisen from either of these two types. It could be derived from a form like Trypanoplasma by loss of the free anterior flagellum, in which case the flagelluu:. of a torypanosome 13 to be regarded as posterior ; on the other hand, if, in a form like Leptomonas, the kinetonucleus and with it the origin of the flagellum, be shifted backwards to the neighbourhood of the trophonucleus, and if at the same time the flagellum runs forwards along the body connected to it by an un- dulating membrane, a Crithidia-like form results, from which, by still further displacement backwards of the kinetonucleus and flagellum to near the posterior end of the body, a trypanosome- form is produced in which the single flagellum is to be regarded as anterior. It is therefore conceivable that the trypanosome-form may comprise two morphological types, structurally indistinguish- able, but entirely different in origin, and opposite in morphological orientation of the body. From this point of view, Woodcock (395) subdivided trypano- somes into two genera : Trypanomorpha, with cercomonad ancestry and flagellum morphologically anterior ; and Trypanosoma, in a restricted sense, with heteromastigote ancestry and flagellum morphologically posterior. The genus Trypanomorpha included only one species, T. nocluce of Athene noctua ; all other species of trypanosomes were left in the genus Trypanosoma sens, strict. Liihe put forward a classification based on similar conceptions with different interpretations, and proposed three genera of trypano- somes : Hcematomonas (Mitrophanow) for the trypanosomes of fresh- water fishes believed to have a heteromastigote ancestry ; Trypano- zoon for the trypanosomes of mammals, such as T. leivisi, T. br'ucii, etc., regarded as having a cercomonad ancestry and an anterior flagellum ; and Trypanosoma sens, strict, for the trypanosomes of frogs and reptiles. T. noctuce, on the other hand, he regarded, in agreement with Sch&udinn (see p. 390, infra], merely as a develop- "THE H^MOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 309 mental stage of Hcemoproteus. Although, however, it is quite possible that some trypanosomes may have a heteromastigote ancestry, all the developmental facts hitherto discovered indicate a cercomonad ancestry with a single anterior flagellum, and there is no concrete evidence of a heteromastigote origin for any species that has been studied up to the present. Trypanoplasms, so far as they have been studied, preserve their biflagellate, heteromastigote type of structure throughout their development in all active phases, and never pass through a trypaniform or crithidial phase. Try- panosomes, on the other hand, show constantly a crithidial phase in the invertebrate host, but have not been observed in any case to be heteromastigote or even biflagellate, except temporarily during division, in any phase of the life-history. Consequently, attempts to subdivide trypanosomes on a -morphological or phylogenetic basis must be regarded at present as premature (compare also Laveran, 461). II. THE GENTTS TRYPANOPLASMA. The peculiar distribution and occurrence of the species of this genus has been pointed out above. Originally founded for forms parasitic in the blood of fishes, it now comprises a somewhat heterogeneous collection of species, some of which were formerly referred to other genera of Flagellates. Of recent years, the number of species known to be parasitic in invertebrate hosts has increased, and is increasing rapidly. Such are T. (" Trypano- phis ") grobbeni, found in the gastro vascular system of Siphdnophora (Keysselitz, 453) ; T. (" Bodo ") helicis, from the receptaculumseminis of Helix pomatia and other snails (Friedrich) ; T. dendroccdi, from the digestive tract of Dendrocodum lacteum (Fantham and Porter, P.Z.S., 1910; p. 670) ; T. vaginalis, from the female genital organs of leeches (Hesse, C.R.A.S., cli., p. 504) ; and T. gryllotalpce, from the end-gut of Gryllotalpa vulgaris (Hamburger). These examples show that the genus, as at present defined, is of widespread occur- rence. It may be doubted, however, if the various species described should all be placed together. The species of Trypanoplasma parasitic in blood are only known as yet from fresh-water fishes ;* they have an alternation of hosts, being transmitted by leeches. The life-history of the intestinal trypanoplasms has not been investigated, but in all probability they have but a single host, which acquires the infection by swallowing accidentally their cysts or other resting stages passed out from a * The " Trypanoplasma " stated by Bruce and his colleagues (412, pp. 495, 496) to occur in the blood of birds and in the digestive tract of tsetse-flies was in reality a Leucocytozoon. 310 THE PROTOZOA former host. T. helicis, according to Friedrich, passes from one snail to another mechanically in the spermatophores during coitus. The following account refers mainly to the blood-inhabiting species : The body of a trypanoplasm is relatively broader and shorter, less sinuous and serpentine, than that of a trypanosome, and is at the same time softer and more plastic, being limited by an extremely thin periplast. The contractile, often slightly metabolic, body yields readily to pressure, and exhibits in consequence passive form-changes when moving among blood-corpuscles or B FIG. 134. — A, Trypanoplasma dbramidis from the blood of the bream ; B and C, T. keysselitei from the blood of the tench : B, small ordinary form ; 0, large form. After Mincnin, magnified 2,000. other solid particles. The principal structural feature is the possession of two fiagella, which arise close together at the anterior extremity from a pair of blepharoplasts or diplosome, or from a single basal granule (Martin). One flagellum proiects freely for- wards ; the other turns more or less abruptly backwards, and passes down the side of the body at the edge of an undulating membrane to the hinder end, beyond which it projects freely backwards to a variable extent in different species. In T. gryllotalpce the un- THE H^MOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 311 dulating membrane only extends along two-thirds of the length of the body, after which the posterior flagellum becomes free. The kinetonucleus, situated at the extreme anterior end of the body, is relatively very large, usually exceeding the trophonucleus in size, and is sometimes constricted into two or three portions, but is generally a compact mass which stains deeply in preparations. In T. helicis, according to Jollos, it is prolonged backwards into fibrils, usually two in number, which extend some way down the body, and are probably comparable to an axostyle. The tropho- nucleus has a vesicular structure with a conspicuous karyosome. Its position in the body varies, being in some species close behind the kinetonucleus, in others near the middle of the body. It often appears to be lodged completely in the undulating membrane, which in this genus is often very broad and less sharply defined than in a trypanosome, appearing as the border of a flattened body. The cytoplasm frequently contains numerous " chromatoid grains." Trypanoplasms in the blood of fishes often exhibit marked polymorphism, with two extremes of size, small and large (Fig. 134, B, C). According to Keysselitz (454), the large forms are the gametes which conjugate in the leech, and are distinguishable as male and female forms, but the statement requires confirmation. From the investigations of Robertson (503) on the development, it appears more probable that the large forms are simply full-grown individuals, ripe for multiplication by fission. Unfortunately, next to nothing is known of the reproduction of the parasites in the vertebrate host, though it has been observed that their numbers are subject to considerable fluctuations, and that a fish showing at one time a very scanty infection, of the blood may have a " relapse," and appear later well infected. Keysselitz accuses these parasites of pathogenic properties, but this charge is founded on observations on fish in captivity, in which weakened powers of resistance may lead to abnormal activities on the part of the parasite (compare also Neresheimer). The development of blood - trypanoplasms in the invertebrate host, which is in all known cases some species of leech, appears to be of a comparatively simple type as compared with that of trypano- somes, and consists of little more than rapid multiplication by binary fission to produce a swarm of relatively small trypano- plasms, some of which, more slender and elongate in form, pass forwards into the proboscis, and are inoculated by the leech into a fish. Conspicuous in this development, as compared with that of trypanosomes, is the entire absence of any uniflagellate forms, crithidial or other. So long as a trypanoplasm is in an active state, it is invariably biflagellate. Resting forms without a locomotor apparatus may occur. In T. helicis, Friedrich describes winter 312 THE PROTOZOA forms with a single nucleus, which is in some cases the tropho- nucleus, in others the kinetonucleus. The accounts given of the process of division are somewhat conflicting. According to Martin, division of T. congeri is initiated by the division of the single basal granule of the flagella, followed by splitting of each flagellum longitudinally. Next the trophonucleus divides amitotically, the karyosome becoming first drawn out into a band, after which the nucleus as a whole is constricted into two. Lastly the kinetonucleus becomes elongated, and divides simply by a transverse constriction into two pieces. Jollos, however, following Rosenbusch's statements for trypanosomes, affirms that the division of both nuclei is mitotic in T. helicia. Alexeieff, on the other hand, denies that the kinetonucleus of Trypanoplasma is a nucleus at all. This author also describes a series of chromatinic blocks at the base of the undulating membrane of T. intestinalis, similar to those seen in Trichomonas (compare Pig. 5). Keysselitz (454) has described syngamy in the development of T. " borrdi " in the leech Piscicola, but the description and figures are unconvincing, and the matter requires reinvestigation. No other investigators have found sexual processes of any kind in trypanoplasms. III. THE GENUS CRITHIDIA. The distinctive structural feature of Crithidia (Fig. 135, A) is the relatively short undulating membrane which, with the single flagellum, arises in the middle of the body from the vicinity of a kinetonucleus situated beside, or in front of, the trophonucleus. The form of the body varies from a relatively long, slender type to the short, " barley-grain " form from which the name of the genus is derived. As already pointed out, the application of the name Crithidia as the denomination of a genus is involved in considerable confusion and perplexity — partly because the distinctive morphological characters shade off by imper- ceptible gradations into those of trypanosomes on the one hand, and leptomonads on the other, but still more because a certain number of the " species of Crithidia " are unquestionably de- velopmental stages either of trypanosomes or leptomonads, and others are justly suspected of being so. In the present state of know- ledge, it is safest to presume that any " Crithidia " from the digestive tract of a blood-sucking insect is a stage of a trypano- some from the blood of a vertebrate, until the contrary has been clearly established. At the same time the possibility must always be taken into account that a blood-sucking invertebrate may harbour flagellate parasites peculiar to itself in addition to those VL FIQ. 135, — Crithidia minuta, L6ger, from the gut of Tabanua tergestinua. A, Or- dinary motile indi- vidual; B, G, young forme, with flagel- lum short or rudi- mentary. After Leger. THE H,EMOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 313 which it takes up in vertebrate blood, and that in this way stages of the life-cycle of two or more distinct parasites may be confused together. Up to the present, however* no blood-sucking insect has been proved satisfactorily to harbour flagellate parasites not derived from vertebrate blood. After deducting doubtful species of Crithidia, there remains a residue which appears to comprise genuine, independent species, parasites of the digestive tract of insects. As examples of such species may be cited C. campanulata, recorded from the digestive tract of Chironomus plumosus (L6ger, A.P.K., ii. 1903, p. 180), from that of the larva of Ptychoptera (Leger and Duboscq) and of caddis- worms (Mackinnon, 547) ; O. gerridis, from Gerris spp. (Patton, 550 ; Porter, 555) ; and possibly others. The life-cycle of C. gerridis has been investigated by Patton and Porter. The parasite appears under two principal phases : an active, flagellate phase, which grows to a large size, and multiplies by fission, sometimes very actively, forming rosettes ; and a resting, non- flagellate Leishmania - form. The flagellate forms may be free in the digestive tract, or may attach themselves to the lining epithelium of the gut by their flagella. The non- flagellate forms are found in the crop, where they grow into the adult phase, and in the rectum, where they become encysted. The flagellate phase is found throughout the digestive tract and in the ovaries, but has not been observed to pass into the ova The encysted forms pass out of the rectum, and infect new hosts by the contaminative method. IV. THE GENUS LEPTOMONAS (HERPETOMONAS). The genus Leptomonas comprises typical intestinal parasites of insects, especially Diptera and, above all, Muscida. Several species are also known in Hemiptera. They are in most cases parasites of the insect alone, having no alternate host, and infection is brought about by the contaminative method, so far as is known, cysts dropped by one host being accidentally devoured by another. But some species are found as parasites of the latex of Euphor- biaceae, and in this case an alternation of hosts occurs. The para- sites are taken up from the plants by bugs (Hemiptera) which suck their juices, and by the agency of the bugs the flagellates are inoculated into other plants again (Lafont ; Bouet and Roubaud, 530 ; Fran$a, 537, 538). There can belittle doubt that in this case the bug is the primary, the plant the secondary host. The plants, or the parts of them that are infected by the Leptomonas, suffer considerablv. The term " flagellosis " has been proposed for the disease. 314 THE PROTOZOA The distinctive structural features of this genus are the possession of a single flagellum, arising from close beside a kinetonucleus which is placed far forwards in the body, and the entire absence of an undulating membrane (Fig. 136, B ; Pig. 137, d). As already stated above, however, the application of the names Leptomonas and Herpetomonas is much disputed, and the morphological defini- tion of the genera in question is attended with considerable diffi- culties, chiefly owing to the fact that in one and the same host a great variety of forms may occur, with regard to which it is not possible, in the present condition of knowledge, to state with cer- tainty whether they represent distinct species of flagellates, refer- able even to distinct genera, occurring fortuitously in the same host, or whether -they are all merely developmental phases of the same species. The following are the principal forms which may A pa TV* u> e.^ r G FIG. 136. — Leptomonas jacvium, L4ger, from the intestine of Nepa cinerea. A, B, Monad forms ; G, division of a monad form ; D, monad form with short flagellum; E, F, O, gregarine-like forms: E, in division, F, attached to an epithelial cell by the rudimentary flagella, which resemble the rostra of gre- garine sporozoites. After L6ger. occur together in the same host : (1) Large, biflagellate individuals (Fig. 124, A), often with a distinct pair of rhizoplasts connected with the two flagella, the type to which, according to one set of opinions, the name Herpetomonas should be restricted, but which on another view represents merely an early stage in binary fission, with a daughter-flagellum precociously formed ; (2) smaller flagel- lates with a single flagellum (Fig. 136, B ; Fig. 137, d), the type for which the name Leptomonas is employed by those who regard the true Herpetomonas as typically biflagellate, while by those who hold the contrary view the two genera are ranked as synonyms ; (3) cri- thidial forms (Fig. 137, g) ; (4) trypaniform flagellates (Fig. 137, j, k), with the kinetonucleus at the posterior end, and the flagellum running the whole length of the body with a more or less distinct undulating membrane — the " leptotrypanosomes " of Chatton. In THE H^MOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 315 addition to these four types of active flagellates, there may occur also non- flagellated individuals or with the flagellum rudimentary — namely, (5) long " gregariniform " individuals (Fig. 136, E — G ; Fig. 137, q) and (6) oval or rounded Leishmania-iorms. The latter may become encysted and function as the propagative stages. If the four active forms are all distinct species, one and the same host may have intestinal flagellates belonging to four different genera ; if they are all phases in the development of one species, it becomes a subtle point for discussion which of the four forms is to be regarded as the " adult " generic type. n. FIG. 137. — Flagellates from the digestive tract and Malpighian tubules of Dro- sophila confusa. a, b, c, Trypanosoma drosophilce, three forms, from the Malpighian tubules; d — q, various forms of Leptomonas drasophilce from the intestine : d, e, f, leptomonad forms ; g, crithidial form ; h, i, transitional forms from the preceding to j, k, the leptotrypanosome-forms ; m, n, small crithidial (" barley-grain ") forms ; o, p, forms transitional from the preceding to q, gregariniform individuals attached to the epithelium by a rudimentary flagellum, the middle one of the three in process of division. After Chatton and Leger (533). Not in every case, however, does such complexity of form occur in the same host. The development of a typical leptomonad, such as L. (H.) jaculum of Nepa cinerea, as described by Porter (556), is of a comparatively simple type, like that of Crithidia gerridis described above. Non-flagellated Leish- mam'a-like individuals give rise to flagellates of the true leptomonad type, which multiply by fission; these in their turn 'pass into a non-flagellated condition in the hind-gut, there becoming encysted and being cast out with the faeces to infect new hosts. Prowazek (557) has described in H. muscas-domes- ticcs an extraordinary complication of male and female types — autogamy, parthenogenesis of female forms, and " etheogenesis " of male forms ; none of these statements can be accepted as even probable until the weighty super- structure of theoretical interpretation is supported by a more substantial foundation of observed facts. Many of the stages described by Prowazek, especially his so-called "etheogenesis," represent stages in the development of distinct parasitic organisms not belonging to the group Flagellata ; compare Flu, Dunkerly. 316 THE PROTOZOA V. THE GENUS LEISHMANIA. This genus was founded by Ross to include two human parasites : the so-called Leishman-Donovan bodies, cause of the disease known in India as "Kala-azar" ; and Wright's bodies (L. tropica), cause of boils known by various local names, but termed compre- hensively " Oriental sore." To these a third species— namely, L. infantum — has been added by Nicolle (570), causing a disease in children in Tunis, Algeria, and Italy, and found also in dogs, which are regarded by Nicolle as the primary host of the parasite and the source of the infection in human beings. In all cases the type of parasite found in the vertebrate host is very uniform (Fig. 138) — small bodies, usually rounded or oval, contained within cells and Fia. 138. — Leishmania donovani in cells. A, A macrophage ; B and C, endothelial cells containing the parasites (p.) ; n., nucleus of the infected cell. After Christophers. multiplying by fission (Fig. 139). Each parasite possesses two distinct nuclear bodies, which the development shows to bea tropho- nucleus and a kinetonucleus respectively. The cells which harbour the parasite are mainly, if not exclusively, of two classes — namely, leucocytes and endothelial cells ; the latter become greatly hyper- trophied, forming the so-called " macrophages " (Fig. 138, A), which may contain 150 to 200 parasites at a time. L. donovani was believed originally to occur also in red blood-corpuscles, and was first described as a species of the genus Piroplasma (p. 379). The balance of evidence, however, is against their occurrence in the hsematids. If set free by the disintegration of their host-cell, they THE H^EMOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 317 are probably taken up by leucocytes, and in them they may be carried into the general circulation. Although the diseases caused by these parasites are termed comprehensively " leishmanioses," they are not all of one type. L. donovani produces a systemic disease, very deadly in its effects, and the parasite is found in immense numbers in the spleen, bone- marrow, liver, etc. L. infetntum is similar in its effects. L. tropica, on the other hand, produces a purely local infection, manifested in the form of one or more boils on the skin, each of which, accord- ing to Wenyon (84), represents either a single infection by the insect, as yet not known with certainty, which transmits the disease, or a secondary infection by a house-fly or by the in- dividual himself from another boil on the skin. The infection by L. tropica has an incubation-period of about two months. The disease lasts from twelve to eighteen months, and one attack, after it is healed spontaneously, confers absolute immunity for the rest of the patient's life. Corresponding with these differences in A C D E Fia. 139. — Leishmania donovani. A, Three parasites in the ordinary condition each showing a larger trophonucleua and a smaller kinetonueleus ; B, C, D, stages of binary fission ; E, multiple fission into three parts. After Chris- tophers. the effects produced by the parasites, there are also slight structural differences to be made out in them. L. donovani (Fig. 138) is very uniform in shape, being rounded or ovoid ; L. tropica (Fig. 140), on the other hand, shows more variety of form, with every transition from elongated, narrow forms with one end pointed to the typical oval body (Row, Wenyon). No other stage than that described above is known from the human body ; but it was first discovered by Rogers (576) for L. donovani, and subsequently confirmed by other investigators for this and other species, that in artificial cultures the parasite develops into a typical leptomonad form (Fig. 140). The Leish- wam'a-forms in the cultures grow considerably in si e, and at the same time multiply by fission. The relatively large rounded forms become pear-shaped, and a flagellum is developed at the blunt end of the body ; finally the organism assumes the typical elongated form of a leptomonad, with a long flagellum arising close beside the kine- tonueleus, which is situated near the anterior end of the body. Leishman and Statham have described a further stage in the 318 THE PROTOZOA development in which slender, so-called off from the large leptomonad forms. spirillar " forms are split There can be little doubt but that the cultural development observed in all the species of Leishmania represents the natural development which the parasite goes through in some invertebrate host. As regards, first, L. dono- vani, arguments have been brought forward incriminating the bed-bug as the Fia. 140. — Leishmania tropica. A, Parasites from the sore, showing different forms ; B and G, development in cultures : B, parasites growing and multi- plying prior to the formation of the flagellum ; G, adult flagellated leptomonad forms, with a couple probably the result of binary fission ; D, adult leptomonad form ; E, similar form with the kinetonucleus dividing ; F, 0, stout forms, two stages of division ; note the flagella arising direct from the kinetonuclei, which are connected by a centrodesmose, indicating that the centriole is con- tained within the kinetonucleus (compare p. 87). A — C, after Row, from preparations stained by the Romanowsky method, magnified 2,000 ; D — G, after Wenyon (84), frofti preparations stained with iron-hsematoxylin after wet fixation. transmitting agent, and Patton (573) has found that the parasite goes through the same stages of development in the digestive tract of the bug (Cimex rotun- dtitus) as in the artificial cultures ; but Donovan believes the true intermediate host in Madras to be another species of bug, Conorhinus rubrifasciatus, and Wenyon (84) considers that the development in the bug obtained by Patton is, like the development in artificial cultures, only an imitation of the develop- ment in the true host, and not a proof of transmission by the bug. Basile THE H^MOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 319 claims to have transmitted L. infantum by fleas. In the case of L. tropica, Wenyon points out that the sores occur almost invariably on parts of the person not covered or protected by clothing, a fact which is strongly against the infection being effected by fleas, bugs, or ticks, and indicates that the invertebrate host is some biting fly, probably either a species of mosquito or a sand-fly (PMebotomus}. Experimental evidence of transmission, however, is as yet lacking. It is clear from the development that the species of Leishmania are non- flagellated phases of a true leptomonad, and it has been proposed by Rogers to abolish the genus Leishmania, and to place the parasites in question in the genus Herpetomonas. The life-cycle of a Leishmania is, however, so different from that of a typical Herpetomonas (Leptomonas), which is parasitic solely in the digestive tract of an insect, that the genus Leishmania may well be allowed to stand. So long as the development is only known from artificial cultures, the significance of the " spirillar " forms of Leishman cannot be determined. Assuming that they are not merely degenerative forms, they may possibly represent the propagative stage in which the invertebrate host inoculates the parasite back into the vertebrate ; the fact that L. donovani causes a sys- temic disease rather suggests that the initial phase in the vertebrate may be a flagellated form which is carried all over the body in the circulation, and from which the typical Leishmania-ph&se is developed. Another possible explanation of the spirillar forms is that they may be gametes, perhaps of male sex ; but there is no evidence in support of this interpretation either from observation or analogy, since sexual phenomena in leptomonads have not been observed. Marzinowsky claims, however, to have observed copula- tion of male and female gametes in cultures of L. tropica. Darling has described under the name Histoplasma capsulatum an organism causing a disease in human beings, and believed to be allied to Leishmania. It is stated to develop flagellated phases in lung-smears. For Toxoplasma, referred by some to a position near Leishmania, see p. 387. " Leucocytozoon " piroplasmoides, found in epizootic lymphangitis of horses in Senegal (Thiroux and Teppaz), is possibly a Leishmania, but only a single mass of chromatin appears to be present in the body, and no flagellated forms were obtained in cultures ; possibly, therefore, its proper systematic position is near Toxo- plasma. VI. THE GENUS PKOWAZEKIA. This genus was created by Hartmann and Chagas (62) for P. cruzi, a species discovered in a culture from human faeces on an agar- plate in Brazil. Two other species have also been described from human faeces — namely, P. wein- bergi, Mathis and Leger (Fig. 141, A and B), and P. asiatica, Whitmore. It would appear, therefore, that several species (or possibly a single species) of this genus occur in various parts of the world in human faeces. Martini considers P. cruzi to be a cause of human diarrhoea and intestinal catarrh in China. Nagler has described a species P. parva (Fig. 141, C), which is free-living, and Dunkerly has found a Prowazekia in the gut of the house-fly. The form which Walker has described under the name " Trypanoplasma ranee " very possibly should be referred to Prowazekia ; it was obtained from cultures of the intestinal contents of the frog. In its structure, Prowazekia resembles the genus Bodo in the heteromastigote arrangement of the flagella, and in its nuclear apparatus it resembles Trypano- plasma, with trophonucleus and kinetonucleus. It differs structurally from Trypanoplasma only in the fact that the backwardly-directed flagellum is free from the body, not united to it by an undulating membrane ; it bears, in fact, the same structural relation to this genus thatj Trichomastix has to Trichomonas. Alexeieff (388) denies that the genus is distinct from Bodo, and considers that the name Prowazekia should be cancelled ; he identifies P. cruzi with B. edax, Klebs, and P. parva with B. saltans, Ehrenberg. 320 THE PROTOZOA Affinities and Phylogeny of the Hcemo flagellates. — Two opposite views have been held with regard to the origin of the Flagellates para- sitic in blood and their allies : First, that they have a double origin along two distinct lines of descent, some being derived from hetero- mastigote, the others from cercomonad ancestors (Woodcock, Doflein, Senn) ; secondly, that the Haemo flagellates are closely allied to certain forms hitherto classed as Hsemosporidia (p. 388), and form with them a homogeneous group or order of the Flagellata, the so-called Binucleata (Hartmann). The question of the Haemosporidia will be discussed below (p. 389). It is sufficient here to deal with the Haemoflagellates alone. From the general survey of the " forms " or " genera " dealt with in this chapter, it is very evident that Trypanosoma, Crithidia, Leptomonas (Herpetomonas), and Leishmania, are very closely 141. — A and B, Prowazekia weinbergi, Mathis and Leger (473), magnified 2,400 ; 0, Prowazekia parva, Nagler (585), magnified about 2,250. related to one another. Structurally the first three types shade off insensibly into one another, the dividing line between Trypano- soma and Crithidia, or between Crithidia and Leptomonas, being quite arbitrary, and far loss definite in reality than it appears when reduced to words ; while Leishmania is a resting non-flagellated phase of any of the three. Developmentally the four types, or any two of them, may occur as phases in the life-history of a single species, so that the selection of a given form as the " adult " in- dividual, by means o*r\vhich the generic name is to be determined, is also, in many cases, quite arbitrary. Phylogenetically an evolu- tionary series can be recognized beginning with Leptomonas, and passing through Crithidia to Trypanosoma, of which the central feature is the gradual development of an undulating membrane which finally runs the whole length of a more or less sinuous and THE H^MOFLAGELLATES AND ALLIED FORMS 321 serpentine body, probably as an adaptation to life and movement in a broth-like medium, containing numerous suspended bodies, such, as occurs in the gut of an insect, especially a blood-sucking insect, or in the blood-fluid of a vertebrate. Leishmania, on the other hand, represents an offshoot from the main stem in which the resting, non-flagellated phase has become the most prominent stage in at least one part of the life-cycle. On the other hand, the Haemo flagellates of the biflagellate type, Trypanoplasma and Prowazekia, stand sharply apart from the uniflagellate genera. The orientation of the body, and of the undu- lating membrane, when present, in particular, is entirely different in the two types. The development in the invertebrate host of Trypano- plasma and Trypanosoma, respectively, are quite distinct In type, rieither form passing through any stages which suggest the slightest affinity with the other. The only feature common to the two types is the possession of a kinetonucleus in addition to the principal nucleus, and it is questionable to what extent this structure can be relied upon to indicate affinity. The large kinetonucleus of Trypanoplasma is very different in appearance from that of the uniflagellate genera ; and, according to Alexeieff (324), it is a struc- ture of quite a different order from the cytological point of view. Finally it should be remarked that it is only in the biflagellate genera that parasitism in the gut of vertebrates is known to occur, With regard to the origin of the forms parasitic in blood, two theories have been put forward. Leger (545) and Brumpt (389) have upheld the view that they were originally parasites of the digestive tracts of invertebrates, as many allied forms still are ; that in many cases their invertebrate hosts acquired the blood- sucking habit, whereby the intestinal flagellates became accus- tomed and adapted to life in blood ; and that, finally, forms so adapted passed from the invertebrate host into the blood of the vertebrate itself. Minchin (476), on the other hand, suggested that possibly the ancestral forms may have been parasites of the digestive tract of vertebrate hosts, and may have passed from the digestive tract into the blood, whence they were taken up by blood- sucking invertebrates and transmitted to fresh hosts, acquiring finally the power of being parasitic upon, and establishing themselves in, the invertebrate host. It must be admitted that all evidence which has accumulated of recent years is in favour of the view of Leger and Brumpt. so far as the uniflagellate forms are concerned. The types denoted by the generic names Leptomonas, Crithidia, and Trypanosoma, form a perfect evolutionary series, beginning with monogenetic parasites of invertebrates and culminating in digenetic blood- parasites. From the same stem other forms of parasitism are seen 21 322 THE PROTOZOA to arise in other directions, as in the digenetic flagellate parasites of Euphorbiaceae. The biflagellate genus Trypanoplasma, on the other hand, com- prises species which, like those of Prowazekia, appear to have been primarily parasites of the vertebrate digestive tract, and which in some cases have established themselves in the blood and have acquired an alternation of hosts (they can hardly be said to have an alternation of generations), having become parasitic in an inter- mediate host, always, so far as is known, a leech, in which they pass through a simple type of development, consisting of little more than simple multiplication by fission, Their structure indicates affinities with heteromastigote types such as Bodo and Trichomonas, common intestinal parasites, rather than with uniflagellate forms. The suggestion is, therefore, that the flagellates parasitic in the blood of vertebrates have two distinct lines of ancestry : the one from heteromastigote forms such as Bodo and Trichomonas, origin- ally parasitic in the gut of the vertebrate and culminating in the genus Trypanoplasma ; the other derived from uniflagellate cer- comonad ancestors originally parasitic in the digestive tracts of invertebrates, and culminating in the genus Trypanosoma (compare also Senn, 358). It must be emphasized strongly, however, that any such conclusions are of a tentative nature, and can have no finality, but are liable to modification with every increase of know- ledge concerning these organisms. Bibliography. — For references see p. 488. CHAPTER XIV THE SPOROZOA : I. THE GREGARINES AND COCCIDIA UNDER the common denomination Sporozoa are grouped together a great number of parasitic organisms extremely varied in form, structure, habitat, and life-history, but of which the most general though not invariable characteristic is that the propagation of the parasite from one host to another is effected by means of spores, in the primary sense of the word (see p. 165, footnote) — that is to say, resistant seed-like bodies within which one or more parasitic germs are protected by a firm envelope or capsule, whereby they are enabled to resist the vicissitudes of the outer world until they pass, in one way or another, into the body of a suitable host ; when this end is attained, the spore germinates — that is to say, the contained organisms are set free and a fresh infection is started. It is very obvious that propagation by means of resistant spores is a character very inadequate for diagnosing an extensive group of Protozoa. In the first place, many organisms, parasitic or free-living, which are not included in the class Sporozoa, are propagated by means of resistant spores. In the second place, many forms included in the Sporozoa do not produce resistant spores, being propagated by methods which render any such phase un- necessary. The class therefore ceases to be amenable to strict verbal definitions, and it is not surprising that the limits assigned to it have varied at different times, and are even now debated. The class Sporozoa was originally founded by Leuckart to comprise two closely allied orders — the Gregarines and the Coccidia. To this nucleus other groups were added, in particular the various forms termed vaguely " psorosperms "* — a word coined originally by Johannes Miiller to denote the spores of the Myxosporidia, but soon extended to other parasitic organisms. Thus " Sporozoa " and " psorosperms " became practically synonymous terms, and the class to which these names were applied became a most heterogeneous assemblage of organisms * From the Greek ^tfy>a, mange, and atrtptut, a seed, on account of the sores and ulcers of the skin of fishes produced by Myxosporidia, arid the resemblance of their spores to little seeds. 323 324 THE PROTOZOA having nothing in common except the parasitic habit and the adaptations arising from it, more especially the propagation by spores. The modern tendency is rather to split up this vast assemblage into smaller groups, and to abolish the Sporozoa as a primary subdivision of the Protozoa. It is practically certain, at least, that the two main subclasses into which it is always divided are per- fectly distinct in their origin. The class Sporozoa is retained here solely in deference to custom and convenience, and without preju- dice to the affinities and systematic position of its constituents, a question which will be discussed when the group as a whole has been surveyed. The life-cycle of a Sporozoon may be started conveniently from the minute germ or sporozoite which escapes from the spore, or from the corresponding stage when spores are not formed. The sporozoite may have one of two forms : it may be an ainoebula, a minute amoeboid organism ; or it may be of definite form, a little rod-like or sickle-shaped animalcule (" falciform body," " Sichel- keim ") which is capable of twisting or bending movements, but retains its body-form, and progresses by gliding forwards ; for this second type of sporozoite the term " gregarinula " has been proposed in a previous chapter (p. 169). The sporozoite, whatever its form, is liberated in the body of the new host, and begins at once its parasitic career ; it nourishes itself and grows, often to a relatively huge size, at the expense of the host. This phase of the life-history is termed the " trophic phase," and the parasite itself during this phase a trophozoite, by which term is understood a parasite that is actually absorbing nourishment from the host. The trophozoite may be lodged within cells (cytozoic), or in tissues of the body amongst the cells (histo- zoic), or in some cavity of the body in which it either lies free or is attached to the wall (coelozoic). Whatever their habitat, the trophozoites of Sporozoa never exhibit any organs or mechanisms for the ingestion or digestion of food, but absorb their nutriment in all cases in the fluid state, by osmosis through the surface of the body, from the substance of the host ; if pseudopodia or flagella are possessed by these parasites, they are never used for food- capture, except in so far as pseudopodia, by increasing the surface of the body, may augment its absorptive powers. The parasite may exhibit multiplicative phases in which it reproduces itself actively, so that there may be many generations of trophozoites within one and the same host, which may thus be quite overrun by swarms of the parasites. Multiplication of this kind, which is non-sexual, is known as schizogony ; the trophozoites which multiply in this manner are termed schizonts ; and the minute 325 daughter-individuals, products of schizogony, are termed mero- zoites, to distinguish them from sporozoites which they may resemble closely. Sooner or later, however, the propagative phase, destined to infect new hosts, makes its appearance ; so-called sporonts (see p. 330, infra) multiply by uporogony, which is combined with sexual phases, to produce the sporozoites. The life-cycle of the parasite may be passed entirely in one host, or there may be an alternation of hosts of different species, with a distinct series of phases of the parasite in each. When there is but a single species of host, the method of infection of new hosts is usually contamina- tive (p. 24), by means of resistant spores and cysts ; when there is an alternation of hosts, the infection may be inoculative (p. 23), without resistant phases, as in malarial parasites, or contamina- tive, with resistant phases, as in Aggregata (p. 353). Whether the life-cycle be of simple or complex type, it ends with the production of sporozoites, bringing it back to the starting- point again ; and in the vast majority of cases the sporozoites are enclosed, one or more together, in tough sporocysts to form the characteristic resistant spores. As a rule each spore arises from a single spore-mother-cell or sporoblast. The Sporozoa fall naturally into two subclasses, which' have received various names, according as one or another of their char- acteristic features has been considered diagnostic. It is best to define each subclass by a number of characteristics, since none by itself is sufficiently distinctive. In the first subclass the trophic and reproductive phases are typically distinct — that is to say, the animal becomes full-grown, and ceases to grow further, before reproduction begins, hence Telosporidia (Schaudinn) ; reproduction takes place usually by a process of multiple fission in which the daughter-individuals are budded or split off on the outer surface of the parent-body, hence Ectosporea (Metchnikoff) ; and the germs or sporozoites produced are gregarinulae, hence Rhabdogeniae (Delage and Herouard). In the second subclass the trophic and reproductive phases usually overlap — that is to say, the still-growing or even quite young trophozoite may begin to form spores, hence Neosporidia (Schaudinn) ; the spore-mother-cells are formed by a process of internal gemmation, being cut off within the cytoplasm of the parent, hence Endosporea (Metchnikoff) ; and the- sporozoites produced are amoebulae, hence Amoebogeniae (Delage and Herouard). Of the three contrasted characters by which the two subclasses are distinguished, the most absolutely diagnostic is probably the form of the sporozoite. The names Telosporidia and Neosporidia 326 THE PROTOZOA are, however, in more common use than the other names of the subclasses given above.* The subclass Telosporidia, as mentioned above, includes the three orders Gregarinoidea, Coccidiidea, and Haemosporidia. ORDER I. — GREGARINOIDEA. The chief characteristics of this order are — First, that the tropho- zoites are parasites of epithelial cells in the earlier stages of their growth, but in later stages they become entirely free from the cells, and lie in cavities of the body ; their most frequent habitat is the digestive tract, but sometimes they are found in the body-cavity or the hsemoccele. The full-grown trophozoite is of relatively large size and definite form, with a thick cuticle as a rule. In addition to these characters, the reproduction and spore-formation, presently to be described, are quite distinctive in type, the most diagnostic feature being that each spore is the product of a single zygote. The Gregarines are an extremely abundant order of the Sporozoa, highly differentiated in structure, and comprising a great number of species classified into genera and families. They occur most commonly as parasites of the digestive tract or body-cavity of insects, but also as parasites of other classes, such as Echinoderms and Annelids ; in Molluscs they are comparatively rare, and, though, they occur commonly in Prochordata (Ascidians), they are not known from any class of Vertebrata in the strict sense of the word. In the early phases of development, during which the tropho- zoite is a cell-parasite, it may be entirely enclosed in the cell, or only attached to it by one extremity of the more or less elongated body. In the latter case the sporozoite may have the anterior end of the body modified into a definite rostrum, by which it attaches itself to the host-cell, and from which is developed a definite organ of attachment, termed an epimerite (Fig. 142, ep.), often of com- plicated structure, and provided with hooks and other appendages. When the cytozoic phase is past and the host-cell is exhausted, the parasite drops off, shedding its epimerite as a rule. In the earlier phase, in which an epimerite is present, the parasite was termed by Aime Schneider a cephalont (" cephalin "), and in the later phase a sporont (" sporadin "), the original use of this term, now applied in a wider sense to denote in this and other orders of Sporozoa those individuals about to proceed to spore-formation. The body of the Gregarine-sporont always contains a single nucleus, but may be divided into partitions or septa formed as ingrowths of the ectoplasm, and is then said to be " septate " or " polycystid." * The subclass Rhabdogenise, as instituted by Delage and Hferouard, included the Sarcosporidia, which, however, are almost certainly true Amoabogenise. THE GREGARINES AND COCCIDIA 327 As a rule, in such cases there is but a single septum, which divides the body into two parts termed respectively protomerite and de-ido- merite (Figs. 7, 142) ; but in the curious genus Tceniocystis (Le"ger, 616) there are a number of septa, giving the parasite a superficial resemblance to a segmented worm. The body of a gregarine consists typically of distinct ectoplasm and endo- plasm. The ectoplasm may be further differentiated into three layers : an ex- ternal cuticle or epicyte, a middle layer or sarcocyte, and a deeper contractile layer or myocyte containing myonemes (Fig. 29, p. 58). The epimerite, with its hooks and processes, is derived from the epicyte ; the septa, if present, from the sarcocyte. The endoplasm is usually extremely granular, and contains great quantities of stored-up food material in reserve for the reproductive processes ; chief amongst these substances are para- glycogen - spherules, extremely charac- teristic of these parasites. A remarkable feature of gregarines is the power possessed, by many species, of gliding forward, often at a great pace, without any visible organs of locomotion. Two explanations have been given of these movements: (1) by Sehewiakoff, that they are due to extrusion of gelatinous fibres from the hinder end of the body, secreted between the epicyte and sarcocyte ; (2) by Crawley. that the movements are produced by contrac- tions of the myonemes which are only present in motile forms. In motionless forms the ectoplasm is very thin, and consists of epicyte alone. The nucleus of a gregarine is usually very large, spherical, and vesicular in type, with one or more distinct karyo- somes. It is typically single, except in the cases of precocious association men- tioned below — exceptions, however, which are only apparent, since in such cases the gregarine represents in reality two individuals fused into one. In the septate forms the nucleus lies in the deutomerite normally. In Pterocephalus (Nina), however, a second nucleus, which appears to be of transitory nature and to take no share in the repro- ductive processes, has been discovered in the protomerite (Leger andDuboscq, 621). The nucleus-like body observed by Siedlecki in Lankesteria ascidice, and by Wenyon (84) in L. culicis, occurring at the point of contact of the two associated sporonts in the cyst, is perhaps a body of similar nature. The nucleus of CattyntrocMamys phronimce is remarkable for being surrounded by a halo composed of radiating processes, each a thin tubular evagination FIG. 142. — Examples of gregarines in the " cephalont " condition. A, Actinocephalus oiigacanthus ; B, Stylorhynchus longicoUis. ep., Epimorite ; pr., protomerite ; d., deutomerite. After Schneider. 328 THE PROTOZOA of the nuclear membrane (Dogiel, 605) ; as a rule the surface of the nucleus is perfectly smooth. Chromidia are stated to occur in the cytoplasm of some gregarines (compare Kuschakewitsch). According to Comes, they are scarce in normal individuals, but become abundant with over-nutrition ; since he states, however, that they arise in the cytoplasm, it is possible that they represent grains of the nature of volutin rather than true chromidia. According to Drzewecki, however, the nucleus of Monocystids may, during the early growth of the trophozoite, break up into chromidia and be re-formed again, or may throw out vegetative chromidia which are absorbed in the cytoplasm ; Kuschake- witsch, however, regards this as a degenerative process. Drzewecki affirms that Stomatophora (Monocystis) coronata, from the vesiculae seminales of Pheretima sp., possesses a mouth-opening in a peristome, and an anal aperture, and takes up solid food in the form of the spermatozoa of its host. If so it is quite unique, not only among gregarines, but among Sporozoa generally. The ingested spermatozoa are stated to be taken up and digested by the nucleolus (karyosome). According to Hesse, the supposed mouth and peristome are parts of a sucker-like organ of attachment. The alleged nucleolar digestion is perhaps a misinterpretation of the extrusion of chroma - tinic particles from the karyosome. The Gregarines are subdivided at the present time into two suborders characterized by differences in the life-cycle. In the first suborder, known as the Eugregarinae, the parasite has no multiplicative phase, but the trophozoites proceed always as sporonts to the propagative phase by a method of reproduction (sporogony) which is combined with sexual processes, and leads to the formation of resistant spores. In the second suborder, the Schizogregarinse, the trophozoites which arise from the sporozoites become schizonts which multiply for several generations non-sexually, by schizogony, before a generation of sporonts (gamonts or gameto- cytes) is produced which proceed to reproduce themselves by sexual sporogony. Stated briefly, the Eugregarinae have only a propaga- tive phase, sporogony, in their life-cycle ; the Schizogregarinae have both a multiplicative phase, schizogony, and sporogony. The sporogony is of essentially the same type in both orders. It is simplest, therefore, first to describe the life-cycle of a eugregarine, and then to deal with the multiplicative phases of the schizogre- garine. The complete life-cycle of a eugregarine may be divided into eight phases. 1. The sporozoites are liberated from the spores in the digestive tract of the host in all cases known, and usually proceed at once to attach themselves to, or penetrate into, the cells of the lining epithelium of the gut ; but in a few cases the sporozoites pass through the wall of the gut into other organs, as does, for example, the common Monocystis of the earthworm, which penetrates into the vesicula seminalis, and finally into sperm-cells. 2. In the early cytozoic phase the trophozoite may be con- tained completely within a cell (Fig. 143, A, B,) or merely attached to it; the former condition, speaking generally, is characteristic THE GREGARINES AND COCCIDIA 329 of the Acephalina, the latter of the Cephalina. In either case, the first effect of the parasite is to produce a hypertrophy, often very great, of the cell attacked (Fig. 143, B] ; later, however, the cell atrophies, dies, and shrivels up (Fig. 143, (7). (a) In the Acephalina the intracellular parasite is set free from the cell by its dissolution, and, if lodged in«the epithelium of the gut, may pass out of the epithelium either on its inner side, into the lumen of the gut again, or on its outer side, into the bloodvessels or body-cavity. (6) In the Cephalina the relation of the parasite to the host- ep. f Fio. 143. — Lankesteria ascidioe, parasite of Ciona intestinalis. A, Young intracellular stages in the intestinal epithelium; ^ B, older intracellular stage ; C, extracellular trophozoite attached by a process of the anterior end of the body to a withered epithelial cell, ep., Normal epithelial cell ; ep. , hypertrophied epithelial cell containing (G.)the young grega- rine ; «., nucleus of normal cell ; n.', nucleus' of infected cell. After Siedlecki, magnified 750. cell varies greatly, and has been studied in detail by Leger and Duboscq (618 and 620). The sporozoite may merely prick the surface of an epithelial cell with its rostrum (e.g., Pterocephalus) , or may dip a short stretch of its anterior end into the cell (e.g., Pyxinid), or may penetrate so far that the nuclear region of the parasite is within the cell (e.g.,Stylorhynchus), or, finally, may become completely intracellular (e.g., Stenophora). Ultimately, in all cases, the chief mass of the body of thegregarine projects from, or grows out of, the host-cell into the cavity of the digestive tract, and becomes the protomerite and deutomerite in septate forms ; the attached 330 THE PROTOZOA portion of the body develops into an epimerite which may acquire a large size and a complicated structure. Originally attached to one cell, which it destroys, the epimerite may acquire a secondary attachment to other cells of the epithelium, which in this case are not injured by it, as in Pteroceyhalus. Ultimately the epimerite breaks off, and the body of the sporont drops into the cavity of the digestive tract. In some cases (Pyxinia) the early attached stages may free themselves from the epithelium several times, and attach themselves again. 3. When liberated from the host-cell, the trophozoite grows into the adult sporont, which, as its future history shows, is a gamont or gametocyte. A remarkable feature of gregarines at this stage is the tendency to associate together (Fig. 7), a habit from which the name Gregarina is itself derived. In some cases quite a number of individuals may adhere to one another in strings ; such associa- tions, known as " syzygies," are, however, of a temporary nature, passing flirtations, as it were, which have no significance for the life-cycle or development. On the other hand, a true association of individuals destined to form gametes always, apparently, occurs at one time or another in the life of the sporont. In the majority of cases, however, the sexual association does not take place till the end of the trophic phase, when the sporont is full-grown and ripe for reproduction. But in a number of instances the associa- tion takes place early in the trophic phase, between quite young free trophozoites ; and " neogamous " association of this kind may lead to almost complete fusion of the bodies of the two individuals, only their nuclei remaining separate, thus producing the appear- ance of a binucleate trophozoite (Fig. 70, p. 128). In general, the two trophozoites which associate are perfectly similar in appearance, and exhibit no differentiation ; this is so in all cases where they pair side by side. In some cases where there is an early association end to end — that is to say, where one sporont attaches itself by its protomerite to the deutomerite of another (Fig. 7, p. 9), as is common in polycystid forms — the two sporonts may be differentiated one from the other. In Didy- mophyes, for instance, the protomerite of the posterior individual disappears ; in Ganymedes the two sporonts are held together by a ball-and-socket joint (Huxley). It is not known whether these differences stand in any constant relation to the sex of the sporonts. In Stylorhynchus the two partners attach themselves to one another by their anterior extremities (Leger, 614). 4. As soon as growth is completed, the reproductive phases are in iated by the formation of a common cyst round the two asso- ciated sporonts, which together form a spherical mass (Fig. 144, a). The parasite is now quite independent of its host ; it is, in fact, a THE GREGARINES AND COCCIDIA 331 parasite no longer, and may now be ejected with the faeces. The nucleus of each sporont then divides by repeated binary fission (Fig. 144, b) into a large number of nuclei, which place themselves at the surface of the body (Fig. 144, c). A question much debated with regard to the life-history of gregarines is whether a single sporont can encyst by itself, without association with another, and then proceed to the formation of spores. It has been asserted frequently that this can occur, and the suggestion has been put forward that the differences in the size of the spore observed in some species may be correlated with double or solitary encystment. Schellack (630) has discussed the question in detail, and is of opinion that in septate eugregarines solitary encystment either does Fia. 144. — Schematic figures of syngamy and spore-formation in gregarines. a, Union of two sporonts in a common cyst ; 6, various stages of nuclear division in each sporont ; c, formation of gametids beginning (" pearl-stage ") ; d, stages in the copulation of the gametes : in the left upper quadrant of the figure, separate gametes are seen ; in the left lower quadrant the gametes are uniting in pairs ; the right lower quadrant shows fusion of the pronuclei ; and in the right upper quadrant complete zygotes (sporoblasts) are seen ; e, stages in the division of the nuclei of the sporoblasts, which assume an oval form ; a different stage is seen in each quadrant, eight nuclei being present in the final stage ; /, cyst with ripe spores, each containing eight sporozoites ; two spores are seen in cross-section. Modified after Calkins and Siedlecki. not occur, or leads to nothing if it doee, but that amongst the Acephalina and schizogregarines it can take place j a clear case has been described by L6ger in Lifhocystis schneideri, parasite of- Echinocardium ; and in Monocystis pareudrili solitary encystment leading to spore-formation is described by Cognetti de Martiis. In some species cysts containing three sporonts have been seen ; Woodcock also found a specimen of Cystobia irregularis with three nuclei. With regard to the differences in the size of the spores, the possi- bility has to be taken into account that in some cases they may be developed parthenogenetically — that is to say, the gametids may each become a sporo- blast directly, without copulation with another. 332 THE PROTOZOA The first division of the nucleus of the sporont has given rise to considerable discussion and has been the object of much study. In the resting state the sporont-nucleus is a body of relatively huge size, but the first spindle formed in the sporont is, like all the subsequent mitoses, a minute structure. Some authors have believed that the sporont contains two nuclei, comparable to those of Infusoria — namely, a very large macronucleus of purely vegetative nature, which takes no part in the subsequent development ; and a minute micronucleus of generative nature, from which the first and subsequent FIG. 145. — Stages in the formation of a generative nucleus (" micronucleus ") from the primary nucleus of Pterocephalua (Nina) gracilis. A, Primary nucleus showing the first appearance of the micronucleus in a clear space ; B, disruption of the primary nucleus ; appearance of the micronucleus in the form of a few chromosomes in the centre of a little island of nuclear substance ; G, further stage in the formation of the micronudeus ; D, microuucleus com- plete with the first centrosome ; the remainder of the primary nucleus in process of absorption. After Leger and Duboscq (621) ; A magnified 800, B, 0, D, 1,000, diameters. mitoses arise. Recent researches, however — more especially those of Schnitzler on Oregarina ovata, Schellack (629) on Echinomera hispida, Leger and Duboscq (621) on Pterocephalus, Robinson on Kalpidorhynchus, Duke on Metamera, and especially Mulsow( 123) on Monocystis rostrata — leave no doubt but that the sporont contains a single large nucleus, which consists chiefly of vegetative chromatin and other substances, but contains also the generative chromatin, relatively minute in quantity in proportion to the whole bulk of the nucleus. 333 The generative chromatin may organize itself into a definite secondary nucleus (" micronucleus ") during the break-up of the sporont-nucleus, as in Ptero- cephalus (Fig. 145) ; or the first spindle arises within the sporont-nucleus before it breaks up, as in G. ovata (Fig. 146) ; or a number of distinct chromo- somes are formed in the sporont-nucleus during the process of its disintegration, which pass to the exterior of the nucleus and form the equatorial plate of a spindle of which the achromatinic elements appear to arise chiefly outside the nucleus, as in Monocystis rostrata. In either case the first spindle consists only of the generative chromatin ; the remainder of .the original sporont-nucleus is disintegrated and absorbed, or is left over in the residual protoplasm of the cyst. The statement of Kuschakewitsch, to the effect that the primary nucleus of the sporont may break up into a mass of chromidia, from which a number of secondary (generative) nuclei are re-formed, has not received confirmation hi any quarter. The mitoses in the sporont are remarkable, in most cases, for the very distinct centrosomes (Fig. 147), which appear at the side of the nucleus-before FIG. 146. — Two stages in the formation of the first division-spindle of Gregarina ovata, showing its origin from a very small part of the primary nucleus. In A the spindle is seen within the primary nucleus ; in B the spindle is becoming free from it at one point, after which the remainder of the primary nucleus degenerates. After Schnitzler ; magnification 850 diameters. division begins as a grain or a pair of grains placed at the apex of a " cone of attraction" ; in Monocystis rostrata, however, centrosomes appear to be absent. The number of chromosomes in the equatorial plate is usually four ; but in Monocystis rostrata the number appears to be eight, and in Pterocephalus and the allied genus Echinomera there are five chromosomes, frur of ordinary size and one large unpaired chromosome. Unlike the unpaired chromosome of Metazoa, that of the gregarines is present in both sexes ; it gives rise, during the reconstitution of the daughter nucleus, to the karyosome ; and the karyo- some is eliminated from the nuclear spindle at the subsequent mitosis. The significance of the unpaired chromosome is far from clear, and requires further elucidation. 5. Each of the nuclei of the preceding stage grows out from the surface of the body surrounded by a small quantity of protoplasm, and thus a great number of small cells are budded off over the 334 THE PROTOZOA whole body of each sporont. The small clear cells produced stud the opaque body of the sporont like pearls ; hence this stage is often spoken of as the " pearl-stage" (perlage, etc.). The remainder of the body of the sporont is left over as residual protoplasm, which may contain nuclei, but which takes no further direct share in the development. The cells that are produced are known as the "primary FIG. 147. — Stages of nuclear division in the cyst of Pterocephalus (Nina) gracilis. A, Resting nucleus with a centrosome at one pole ; B, division of the oentro- some ; G, D, formation of the nuclear spindle and equatorial plate ; ejection of the karyosome ; E, nuclear spindle, with the unpaired chromosome on the left, also the remains of the karyosome ; F, diaster-stage, with the unpaired chromosome stretching across, the karyosome on the left ; the centrosomes have each divided again ; O, H, later stages of division ; /, J, K, reconstruction of the daughter-nucleus ; the unpaired chromosome forms the karyosome. After Leger and Duboscq (621); magnification of the figures, 1,200 diameters. sporoblasts," but a better name for them is the gametids, since each one is destined to become a gamete The amount of transforma- tion which a gametid undergoes in becoming a gamete may be very considerable, or it may be practically nil. In some cases the male gamete develops a special structure, while the female remains THE GREGARINES AND COCCIDIA 335 unmodified ; in other cases both male and female remain in the undifferentiated condition of the gametid. For an account of the gametes of gregarines, see above (Fig. 79, p. 174). Reduction has been described in several cases in the formation of the gametids. In the genus Qregarina the nucleus of the gametid divides twice to form two reduction-nuclei (Leger and Duboscq, 621); Paehler and Schnitzler have also described a reduction-division in the gametids of Ore- garina ovata. In Monocystis rostrata, on the other hand, the reduction takes place, according to Mulsow (123), in the last nuclear division in the sporont- body, prior to the budding off of the gametids. In this case the ordinary number of chromosomes is eight, as seen in all the divisions of the nuclei ; in the final division the eight chromosomes associate to form four pairs, those of each pair being in close contact, but not fused ; in the mitosis that follows one chromosome of each pair goes to each pole of the spindle, thus reducing the number of chromosomes in each gametid-nucleus from eight to four. 6. When the gametes are ripe, they copulate in pairs, and probably in every case the gametes of each pair are of distinct parentage. This is certainly the case when the gametes show any trace of sexual differentiation, since those of one sex can be seen to arise from one sporont, and of the other sex from the other. In many cases the two sporonts are separated from one another by a partition dividing the cyst into two chambers, in one of which the male gametes are formed, in the other the female ; when the gametes are ripe, the partition breaks down and pairing of the sexes takes place. 7. The zygote becomes oval or spindle-shaped, and a membrane is secreted at its surface to form the sporocyst, which becomes an exceedingly tough and impervious envelope, and is generally composed of two layers — epispore and endospore. Within the sporo- cyst the nucleus (synkaryon) divides usually three times to form eight nuclei, and then the protoplasm of the sporoblast divides up into as many slender, sickle-shaped sporozoites, leaving over a small quantity of residual protoplasm. The sporozoites are usually arranged longitudinally in the spore, with the residual protoplasm at the centre. The number of sporozoites in the spore is almost invariably eight ; exceptions to this rule are only known amongst the schizogregarines. The spores of gregarines differ enormously in different species in form and appearance, and often have the sporocyst prolonged into tails, spines, or processes of various kinds. Various mechanisms may be developed for liberating the spores from the cyst ; for instance, in the genus Gregarina (Clepsydrina) the cyst is provided with sporoducts, and the residual protoplasm derived from the sporonts swells up when the spores are ripe, and forces them out through the sporoducts in long strings. 8. The ripe spore with its contained sporozoites passes out of 336 THE PROTOZOA the body to the exterior. Usually it passes out per anum with the faeces, but when the spores are formed in some internal organ of the body, as in the Monocystis of the earthworm, it may be necessary for the host to be eaten by some other animal, which then scatters the spores broadcast in its faeces. In all cases, so far as is known, the new host is infected by the casual or contaminative method, and in its digestive tract the spores germinate and liberate the sporozoites. In the case of Cystobia minchinii, parasite of Cucu- maria, it is extremely probable that the host acquires the infection by taking up the spores per anum into its respiratory trees, where the spores germinate (Woodcock). The schizogony characteristic of the schizogregarines takes place during either the second or third of the phases described in the foregoing paragraphs, in trophozoites derived from the^ sporo- zoites by growth, and it takes various forms which cannot be described in general terms ; a few examples must suffice. 1. Sdenidium cautteryi (Fig. 148) : The sporozoite penetrates into a cell of the intestinal epithelium, and grows to a large size, remaining uninucleate. When full-grown, the intracellular parasite gives rise by a process of multiple fission to a great number of motile merozoites which penetrate into epithelial cells, grow, and finally become free sporonts. The schizogony of Merogre- garina amaroucii (Porter) is of a similar type, but fewer merozoites are produced by the schizont. 2. In Schizocystis gregarinoides (Fig. 149) the sporozoite attaches itself by its rostrum to an epithelial ceil, and as it grows in size its nuclei multiply ; it finally becomes a multinucleate schizont of very large size, which may be either vermiform, and is then attached by an anterior sucker-like organ to the epithelium, or massive in form, and quite free. When full-grown, its body divides up into as many small merozoites as there are nuclei. The merozoites may probably repeat this development and multiply by schizogony again ; or a merozoite may grow, without multiplication of its nucleus, into a sporont, which proceeds to sporogony of a typical kind. In Schizocystis sipunculi (Dogiel, 603) the schizont has a principal nucleus near its anterior end, and forms a number of secondary nuclei near the hinder end of the body, apparently from chromidia given off from the principal nucleus, which loses its chromatin. Round the secondary nuclei protoplasm aggregates, and finally about 150 to 200 merozoites are formed, lodged in a cavity in the cyto- plasm of the schizont. The principal nucleus and the maternal body of the schizont now degenerate, and the merozoites are set free. 3. In Porospora gigantea of the lobster, the largest gregarine known, the full-grown individuals round themselves off, become encysted singly, and divide up to form an immense number of so-called " gymnospores " (Fig. 150), each of which consists of a cluster of merozoites grouped round a central mass of residual protoplasm. The subsequent development and the sporogony are unknown ; the schizogony was formerly mistaken for the sporogony (Leger and Duboscq, 621). In the species Porospora legeri, recently described by Beauchamp (592) from the crab Eriphia spinifrons, a similar process of schizogony is recorded ; but in this case an associated couple or syzygy of two trophozoites becomes encysted together, to undergo a similar process of non sexual multiplication. The association is one of two septate trophozoites closely attached, with loss of the protomerite in the posterior individual, as in Didymophyes ; the subse- quent development and sporogony are unknown. Leger and Duboscq (622) THE GREGARINES AND COCCIDIA 337 have described recently a number of new species of Porospora from various Crustacea ; they suggest that the genus Porospora represents the schizogony, the genus Cephaloidophora the sporogony, of the same cycle. 4. In the peculiar genus Ophryocystis (Fig. 151), parasitic in the Malpighian FIG. 148. — Selenidium cautteryi. A, Full-grown intracellular schizont, x 850 ; B, stage in the multiplication of the nuclei of the schizont, x 1,200 ; G, schi- zogony complete, showing the merozoites, x 1 ,000 ; D, young sporont embedded in an epithelial cell, X 700 ; E, free, adult sporont, x 700. After Brasil (596). tubules of certain beetles (Tenebrionidce, Curcidionidce, etc.), and formerly regarded as a distinct order of Sporozoa, the Amrebosporidia, a double schizogony takes place ; there are first of all multinucleate schizonts which can 22 338 THE PROTOZOA reproduce their like for many generations, but which finally produce mero- zoites which grow up into paucinucleate schizonts, and these produce mero- zoites which grow up into sporonts. The sporogony of this genus is also peculiar. Two sporonts associate, and the nucleus of each sporont divides into three ; the body of each sporont then divides into a smaller cell with one nucleus and a larger cell with two nuclei ; the small cell is a gamete, which is FIG. 149. — General diagram of the life-cycle of Schizocystis gregarionides, after Leger (617, ii.). A, Sporozoite escaping from the spore ; B, C, D, E, growth of the sporozoite into the multinucleate schizont, of which there are two types : the vermiform schizont (a), which attaches itself to the epithelium by its anterior end, and the massive schizont (6), which lies free in the gut of the host; F, division of the schizont into a number of merozoites, which may either grow into schizonts again (O1, GP), or may grow into sporonts (G3) ; H, young sporonts ; /, association of two full-grown sporonts ; J, formation of a common cyst by two associated sporonts ; K, division of the nuclei in the sporonts ; L, formation of the gametes by the sporonts ; M , copulation of the gametes ; N, each zygote becomes a sporo blast and forms a spore. enveloped by the larger binucleate cell. The two gametes copulate, and the zygote becomes a single spore with the usual eight sporozoites ; the two binucleate envelope-cells form a protective envelope to the spore during its development, and die off when it is ripe (Leger, 617, i.). (For Schaudinndla see p. 355.) THE GREGARINES AND COCCIDIA 339 The Gregarinoidea are classified as follows : Suborder I. — Eugregarince (without Schizogony). Tribe 1 : Acephalina. — Without an epimerite and non-septate ; typically, though by no means invariably, " coelomic " parasites. Example : Monocystis, with several species parasitic in the vesiculae seminales of earthworms, and many allied genera and species ; see especially Hesse, Also many other genera parasitic in various hosts — echinodenns, ascidians, arthropods, etc. Tribe 2 : Cephalina. — With an epimerite in the early stages, at least, of the trophic phase ; in one family, Doliocystidce, non-septate, but all others septate, with protomerite and deutomerite, or with many segments (Toenio- cystis, Metamera). Typically parasites of the digestive tract, most common in insects. This tribe comprises a great number of -vaa*- families, genera, and species ; see Minchin FIG. 150. — " Gynmo- (589). The type-genus Gregarina (Clepsy- spore" of Porospora j ' \ ' , gigantea, consisting of anna) comprises many common species, such a number Of sporo as G. ovata of the earwig, G. blattarum of writes arranged radi- the cockroach, G. polymorpha of the meal- S*3"£ji TnTh worm (Fig. 7, p. 9), etc. Other well-known contains a chromatinic species wo—Pterocephalus (Nina) nobilis, from the centipede (Scolopendra spp.) ; Stylo- rhynchus longicollis (Fig. 142), from the cellar-beetle, Blaps mortisaga, and many others. The family Doliocystidoe contains species parasitic in marine Annelids. Suborder II. — Schizogregarince (with Schizogony). Various methods of classifying thet Schizogregarines have been proposed. Leger and Duboscq (645) divide them into Monospora, which produce a single spore in the sporogonic cycle (example : Ophryocystis) ; and Polyspora, which produce many spores. Fantham proposes to divide them into Endoschiza, in which the schizogony takes place in the intracellular phase, as in Selenidium and Ecto- schiza, in which the schizont is a free trophozoite, as- in Ophryo- cystis and Schizocystis ; the aberrant genus Siedleckia is probably to be referred here also (see Dogiel, 606). The present state of knowledge is hardly ripe, however, for a comprehensive classifica- tion of the schizogregarines, and it may well be doubted whether they are to be considered as a homogeneous and natural suborder ; some of the families of the Schizogregarinse- appear to be more closely allied to particular families of Eugregarinae than to one another. Leger (617, ii.) points out that the family Schizocystidce shows close affinities with the eugregarine family Aotinocephalidce. 340 THE PROTOZOA Pfeffer asserts that the young intracellular stages of the mealworm- gregarine multiply by fission. Porospora, with its remarkable schizogony, is apparently a septate cephaline gregarine of the Fio. 161. — Diagram of the life-cycle of Ophryocystis, after Leger (617, i.). A, The spore setting free sporozoites ; .B, the sporozoite attached by its rostrum to the epithelium of the Malpighian tubule ; 0, multiplication of the nucleus of the sporozoite, and growth to form D, the multinucleate or " mycetoid " schizont ; E, division of the multinucleate schizont into a number of mero- zoites (F), each of which may become a multinucleate schizont again, or (0, H) may become a paucinucleate or " gregarinoid " schizont ; H, division of the paucinucleate schizont to form young sporonts (/, J) ; K, association of two sporonts ; L, formation of a common cyst round the associated sporonts, and division of their nuclei ; M , formation of three nuclei in each sporont ; N, separation of a gamete (g.) within the body of each sporont, while the rest of the body, with two nuclei, becomes an envelope-cell ; 0, the two gametes have fused to form the zygote (2.) or sporo blast ; P, the sporo blast has as- sumed the form of the spore, and its nuclei have divided into four ; ultimately eight nuclei and as many sporozoites are formed. ordinary type. A character such as the possession of the power of multiplication by schizogony is clearly one of great adaptive importance in the life-history of a parasitic organism, and therefore THE GREGARINES AND COCCIDIA 341 not likely to be of classificatory value. The classification of the future will probably be one which divides all gregarines into Cepha- lina and Acephalina, and distributes the *chizogregarines amongst these two divisions. At present the following families of schizogregarin.es are recog- nized : Ophryocystidce, Schizocystidce, Selenidiidce, Merogregarinidce, and Porosporidce. For the family Aggregatidw see p. 353. ORDER II. — COCCIDIA. The chief characteristics of the Coccidia are that, with very few exceptions, the parasites are of intracellular habitat during the trophic phase, and that a number of spores or sporozoites are produced within a cyst, all of which are the offspring of a single zygote. Further, there is always an alternation of generations, non-sexual multiplicative schizogony alternating with sexual propagative sporogony. As a general rule the entire life-cycle is confined to a single host, but in one family (Aggregatidce) an alterna- tion of hosts occurs, corresponding with the alternation of genera- tions ; that is to say, the schizogony takes place in one host, the sporogony in another. Coccidia are found as parasites of various groups of the animal kingdom. In contrast to gregarines, they are found sparingly in Insects, and, indeed, in Arthropods generally with the exception of Myriopods ; but they occur commonly in Molluscs, and especially in Vertebrates of all classes. They are found also in Annelids, but not abundantly, and in Flat- Worms (Turbellaria) and Nemertines. A parasite of the gregarine Cystobia chiridotce has been identified by Dogiel (602) as a coccidian, and given the name Hyalosphcera gregarinicola. The intracellular trophozoite is typically a motionless body, spherical, ovoid, or bean-shaped, often with a considerable resem- blance to an ovum ; hence these parasites were formerly spoken of as egg-like psorosperms (" eiformige Psorospermien "), and the same idea is expressed in such a name as Coccidium oviforme, given by Leuckart to the familiar parasite of the rabbit now generally known as C. cuniculi (or C. stiedce). The same deceptive resemblance extends to the propagative phases, and the eggs of parasitic worms have before now been mistaken for coccidian cysts, or vice versa. The infection of the host takes place in every case, so far as is known at present, by the casual or contaminative method. Resis- tant spores or cysts of the parasite are swallowed accidentally with the food, and germinate in the digestive tract. The sporozoites escape and are actively motile ; in the majority of cases they pene- trate into cells of the intestinal epithelium, but they may under- 342 THE PROTOZOA FIG. 1 52. — Life-cycle of Coccidium schubergi. A — E, Schizogony ; F — 7, gametog- ony ; K, L, syngamy ; L — 0, sporogony. A, Sporozoite liberated from the spore ; B, three epithelial cells to show three stages of the parasite ; in the first (to the left) a sporozoite (or merozoite) is seen in the act of pene- [Continued at foot of p. 343. THE GREGARINES AND COCCIDIA 343 take more extensive migrations, and find their way into some other organ of the body, of which they are specific parasites, such' as the liver, fat-body of insects, genital organs, kidneys, and so forth. When they have reached the cell, of whatever tissue it may be, which is their destination, they penetrate as a rule into the cyto- plasm, and come to rest there, but in some cases they are intra- nuclear parasites. The trophozoite grows slowly at the expense of the host-cell, which is at first greatly hypertrophied as a rule, but is ultimately destroyed ; and when full-sized the parasite enters upon the multiplicative phase as a schizont. After several generations of schizogony, a generation of trophozoites is produced ultimately, which become sexually - differentiated sporonts and proceed to sporogony. The great power of endogenous multiplication possessed by these parasites renders them often pathogenic, or even lethal, to their hosts, in contrast to the usually quite harmless gregarines. As a rule, however, the production of a pathological condition in the host reacts on the parasite, and stimulates, apparently, the development of propagative phases, which, by passing out of the host, purge it of the infection. In this way the disease — " coccidiosis," as it is termed generally — may cure itself, and the host recuperates its health, but without acquiring immunity against reinfection. As a typical coccidian life-cycle may be taken that of Coccidium schubergi (Fig. 152), from the common centipede, Lithdbius forfiealus, described by Schaudinn (99) in a classical memoir. The complete life-history may be' divided into eight phases, which are described FIG. 52 continued : trating the cell ; the other two cells contain parasites (p.) in different stages of growth (schizonts) : n., nucleus of the host-cell ; G, D, multiplication of the nuclei of the full-grown schizont; E, the schizont has divided into a number of merozoites (mz.) implanted on a mass of residual proto- plasm ; the merozoites, when set free, may either penetrate into epithelial cells and become schizonts again, as indicated by the long arrow, or may develop into sporonts (gametocytes) ; F, epithelial cell containing two young sporonts, the one male ( ). The anterior end of the body is blunt, the posterior pointed ; the surface of the body contains myonemes running spirally, visible in the living state at the anterior end as oblique striations. The youngest trophozoites have a single nucleus, but as they grow the nuclei multiply, until in the full-grown organism there are eight. The trophozoite is now a schizont, and penetrates into an epithelial cell of the intestine in order to multiply by schizogony. The vermiform body rolls up within the cell into a compact oval mass (Fig. 155, E), and then each of its eight nuclei grows out into a tongue-like cytoplasmic process. In this way eight merozoites are formed round a central residual mass. The merozoites are set free as the uninucleate trophozoites (Fig. 155, F, O). This "in- different " type of schizogony may continue for several generations, until a final generation appears in which the schizonts are sexually differentiated; smaller, slender trophozoites with eight nuclei give rise to eight merozoites which grow into male sporonts, and larger, stouter forms with four nuclei produce four merozoites which become female sporonts. The male sporonts (gametocytes) arise from vermicules with clear cytoplasm, which penetrate into an epithelial cell and roll up into an ovoid mass (Fig. 155, H) ; they may do this when they have but a single nucleus, but usually not until the nuclei have increased to eight. In the compact, intra- cellular gametocyte the nuclei multiply rapidly in a manner similar to that described above for the schizont of Adelea, by binary or multiple fission following division of the karyosome. In later stages of multiplication the karyosomes become very small, and the peripheral chromatin of the nuclei increases greatly, so that they have the appearance of patches of granules (Fig. 155, 1). When the multiplication is complete, each such patch of granules forms the dense, comma-shaped nucleus of a microgamete (Fig. 155, J). An enormous number of mierogametes arise from each gametocyte, but the structure of the free mierogametes has not been made out. The female gametocytes arise from stout vermicules which penetrate into a cell and become rounded off, the nucleus remaining single all the time (Fig. 155, K, L, M). The oval gametocyte grows, and its cytoplasm becomes full of chromatoid grains. When full-grown it appears to go through a process of maturation, in which, as in Adelea, the karyosome divides into two, and one half is expelled. The full details of the fertilization have not been made out, but macrogametes have been seen with the nucleus placed superficially, and with a small corpuscle, apparently a microgamete, adherent to the body (Fig. 155, N). After fertilization the zygote becomes spherical and surrounds FIG. 155. — Selenococcidium intermedium : various phases in the life-cycle. A, B, C,D, Vermicules with one, two, five, and eight nuclei respectively ; E, vermi- cule rolling up prior to schizogony ; F, schizogouy nearly complete ; eight pear-shaped merozoites, each with a single nucleus, budded off from a mass of residual protoplasm to which they are still attached by long stalks ; G, schizogony complete ; eight uninucleate vermicules rolled up together ; H, I, J, formation of microgametes : H, the nuclei of the microgametocyte at an early stage of division ; /, later stage ; J, formation of a great number of comma- shaped microgametes ; K, L, vermicule rolling up to become a macrogameto- cyte ; M , fully-formed macrogametocyte, its cytoplasm full of patches of chromatoid granules that stain deeply with iron-hfematoxylin ; 2V, macro- gamete at the moment of fertilization ; 0, oocyst with very numerous chroma* toid grains. After Le"ger and Duboscq (646). 352 THE PROTOZOA itself by a tough oocyst (Fig. 155, 0) ; in this stage it is expelled from the body with the faeces. The subsequent development of the oocyst, spore- formation, etc., are not known. From these data it is sufficiently clear that Selenococcidium is perfectly gregarine-like in its trophic phase and in its schizogony ; the trophozoites are free vermicules which multiply just as in Schizocystis. The parasite only penetrates into a cell when it enters upon reproductive phases. On the other hand, the sporogony, so far as it is known, and especially the sexual processes, are entirely coccidian in type. Selenococcidium links the gregarines and coccidia in a striking and convincing manner, as will be discussed further below. Classification. — The Coccidia have been classified in various ways at different times, as increased knowledge of these organisms has shown older schemes to be artificial or unnatural. The following classification is in the main that of Liihe (392), with certain modifications. Some genera have not, however, been investigated sufficiently to make their systematic position certain. Suborder I. : Prococcidia. Trophozoites free, vermiform, motile ; schizogony similar in type to that of Schizogregarines. The only genus known at present is Selenococcidium. The genus Siedleckia should perhaps be placed here, perhaps in the Schizo- gregarines near Schizocystis ; its sporogony is as yet unknown. Suborder II. : Eucoccidia. Trophozoites typically -intracellular, motionless, oviform, rarely free or vermiform ; schizogony of coccidian type. SECTION A.— Forms in which the sporonts do not associate prior to gamete- formation, and numerous microgametes are produced : Family 1 : Coccidiidce (Eimeridce). — The schizogony is of a simple type, as described in C. schubergi. Examples : Coccidium (Eimeria) and allied genera ; Barroussia (Barrouxia), with type B. ornata, from the gut of Nepa cinerea ; Cydospora, including C. caryolytica, from the intestine of the mole ; and other genera. Cryptosporidium muris, from the gastric glands of the mouse, has free trophozoites and produces a single tetrazoic spore. Family 2 : Carvotrophidce. — With double multiple fission in the schizogony. Example : Caryotropha mesnilii, parasite of the Annelid Polymnia nebulosa (Siedlecki, 653). Klossiella muris,* from the kidney of the mouse, should perhaps be referred to this family, possibly also Merocystis kathce (Dakin). SECTION B. — Forms in which the sporonts (gametocytes) associate prior to gamete -format ion, and the number of male gametes is reduced to four : Family 3 : Adeleidce. — With sporocysts. Examples : Adelea, with several species, of which the best known is A. ovata, parasite of the intestine of Lithobius ; Klossia, with type K. helicina, from the kidneys of Helix spp. ; Orcheobius herpobdellce, from the testis of the leech Herpobdella (Kunze) ; and Caryospora simplex, from the intestine of Vipera aspis, in which the contents of the oocyst form a single octozoic spore (Leger, 644). Minchinia chitonis, from the liver of Chiton and Patella spp., should perhaps be referred to this family, but the gamete-formation is not yet known. Family 4 : Legerellidce. — Without sporocysts. Example : Legerella nova, parasite of the Malpighian tubes of Glomeris. A classification similar in the main to the above has been put forward by Leger (644), who terms Section A the Eimeridea. Section B the Adeleidea. * My friend Dr. A. C. Stevenson, of the Pathological Department, University College, who has studied Klossietta, informs me that he considers it possible that it may represent a stage of Hoemogr&jarina musculi (p.JJ77). THE GREGARINES AND COCCIDIA 353 Leger proceeds to divide the two sections further by the number of sporozoites produced in the oocyst, but we venture to doubt if this is a method of classi- fication which is natural. In the section Adoleidea, Leger includes the haemo- gregarines as a family, Hcemogregarinidoe, characterized by producing one octozoic spore ; but this is true only of two species, so far as is known at present, and certainly not of many others (see p. 378, infra). There remains for mention the family Aggregatidae, comprising certain organisms, generally regarded as coccidia, parasitic upon Cephalopods of various genera (Sepia, Medone, Octopiis, etc.). These parasites fall into numerous species, of which Moroff (94) enumerates twenty-one, but they are comprised in a single genus which has gone through many vicissitudes of nomenclature, having figured at different times under the names Benedenia, Leger ia, Legerina, and Eucoccidium ; but when it had, apparently, settled down under the last of these names, it was discovered that the schizogony, formerly supposed to be absent in this genus of parasites, occurs in a distinct host — namely, a crab — where it had been seen by Frenzel and named by him Aggregata ; this name stands, therefore, as the " correct " name of this genus of parasites. Not less debatable than the name of these parasites is their systematic position. While, up to a comparatively recent time, their schizogonous phases in crabs had been regarded as those of coelomic gregarines, their sporogonous cycle in Cephalopods was accepted as that of a coccidian. Siedlecki (652) investigated the sexual phases, and found a type of sporogony quite in accordance with that of coccidia — namely, sporonts (gametocytes) separated from one another, the male gametocyte producing a great number of microgametes, one of which fertilized a macrogamete, with subsequent division of the zygote to form a number of sporoblasts and spores. Recently, however, Moroff published a note in which ho maintained that the fertilization was of a type quite different from that described by Siedlecki. He asserted that the macrogametocyte gave rise before, not after, fertilization to a number of sporoblasts, and that the sporoblasts in question were the true macrogametes, each of which, after being fertilized, gave rise to a single spore. In other words, Moroff described the fertilization as being of the gregarine-type, and not that characteristic of coccidia. Consequently these organisms have been classified by Fantham and by Leger and Duboscq (645) amongst the schizogregarines. In his latest work, however, Moroff (94) acknowledges that the proofs of the process of fertilization alleged by him are inadequate to establish the point at issue, and that further investigations are necessary ; he is no longer prepared to insist on the gregarine-nature of these organisms. Until, there- fore, the question has been settled by fresh observations, the account of the sporogony and sexual phases given by Siedlecki must stand. These parasites may be regarded as a distinct family of the coccidia, the Aggregatidce, characterized by an alternation of hosts corresponding to an alternation of generations. The life-cycle in its general outline is as follows: The spores are produced in the bodies of Cephalopods ; the dead bodies of the Cephalopods, killed hi various ways (by porpoises, for example), are eaten by crabs, which thus infect themselves ; the spores germinate in the intestine of the crab and liberate the sporozoites, which traverse the wall of the intestine and come to rest in the subepithelial connective-tissue layer. There the parasite grows to a large size, forming a cyst which bulges into the body-cavity, and repro- duces itself by sohizogony, a process which has been studied exhaustively by Leger and Duboscq (645). The final result is a vast number of merozoites. If now the crab be eaten and digested by a Cephalopod, the merozoites resist the digestive juices and establish themselves in their new host. The cycle in the Cephalopods has been studied by Moroff. The merozoites grow into sporonts or gametocytes which are not sexually differentiated, but when their growth is complete sexual differences are seen in the mode of gamete-formation. Whatever the method of fertilization, a number of sporoblasts are formed from which the spores arise ; each spore has a tough 23 354 THE PROTOZOA fiporocyst, and contains, in different species, from three to twenty-four eporozoites. The various species of Aggregate appear to be specific to par- ticular hosts, whether crabs or cephalopoda. If the Aggregatidce are coccidia; they differ from other coccidia in having an alternation of hosts, and in the absence of an oocyst formed round the zygote. If, on the other hand, they are gregarines, they differ from all other known gregarines (with the exception of the doubtful form Schaudtnndla, see p. 355, infra), not only in the alternation of hosts, but also in the fact that the gametocytes remain separate and produce gametes without previous association. If the view put forward by Moroff is the true one, they are to be regarded rather as forms derived from the ancestral form of gregarines and coccidia (see below), before the habit of association of gametocytes, so charac- teristic of gregarines, had been acquired. Comparison of the Life-Cydes of Coccidia and Gregarines. — It is seen that a typical coccidian, such as Coccidium schubergi, differs from a typical gregarine mainly in the following points : (1) The trophozoites are intracellular ; (2) the gametocytes ar^ more or less widely separated from one another at the time they produce gametes; (3) the female gametocyte does not divide into a number of gametes, but remains undivided to form a single macrogamete, disproportionately large as compared with the male gametes ; (4) the zygote undergoes a process of division, with the result that all the spores produced within the cyst are the offspring of a single zygote, while in gregarines the cyst contains many zygotes and each zygote gives rise to a single spore. When, however, the coccidia are considered as a whole, it is seen at once that the first two points do not furnish absolute distinctions ; in Selenococ- cidium the trophozoites are motile and extracellular, and in Adeleidce the game- tocytes associate together. There remains only the sporogony which stands out as the distinctive feature of each group. It is by no means difficult to understand, however, the manner in whicn the two types of sporogony, different as they may appear, could have arisen from a commqn source. The common ancestral form, from which the two groups arose by divergent evolution and adaptation to different modes of parasitism, may be supposed to have been a parasitic organism in which the trophozoites that grew into gametocytes were separated from one another, as in coccidia, and consequently, when full-grown, produced their gametes separately ; and each gametocyte produced a number of gametes which differed only slightly from one another, as in gregarines. From such a form the coccidia arose by the acquisition of an intracellular habitat on the part of the trophozoites, whereby the gametocytes remained more or less widely separated when they produced gametes. As a result of this condition the gametes have to seek each other out, and may easily miss one another ; consequently there was a tendency to greater specialization of the gametes. The male gametes became very small and very motile, and were produced in large numbers. The female gametocyte, on the other hand, no longer divided up into a number of gametes, but became a single large macro- gamete. As soon, however, as fertilization is effected, the suppressed divisions of the female gametocyte take place in the zygote, which divides into the sporo blasts produced formerly by the division of the gametocyte. The gregarine-type, on the other hand, arose from the ancestral form by the trophozoites which grow into sporonts being free and motile in the later stages of their growth ; consequently, gametocytes of different sei.es were able to come together and produce their gametes in close proximity, and finally to associate intimately and produce their gametes within a common cyst. In such a condition it was impossible that the gametes should miss one another ; consequently there was no tendency to increased specialization of the gametes, but, on the contrary, a tendency for the gametes to lose even the slight degree of specialization inherited from the ancestral form, with the result that a more or less perfect isogamy was developed ; and instead of the microgametes being produced in excess, the numbers of each kind of gamete produced are approximately equal. THE GREGARINES AND COCCIDIA 355 It follows, from the course of evolution sketched in the foregoing paragraphs, that in both gregarinea and coccidia the cyst is to be regarded as a secondary acquisition. In the ancestral form there were simply scattered zygotes from which the spore with its contained sporozoites arose ; the spore may, in fact, be regarded as representing the primary form of the encysted parasite, comparable to an encysted zygote of the Flagellata. It is indeed obvious that the cyst of gregarines and coccidia respectively are quite different things. In gregarines the cyst is formed round the two associated gameto- cytes — it is a " copularium," asLegerhas termed it ; in coccidia the cyst is a protective membrane formed round the zygote, immediately after fertiliza- tion. In the genus Legerdla among coccidia, however, the cyst is the sole protective membrane formed to enclose the sporozoites, no sporocysts being produced, a condition which is of interest, since it leads on to that found in the Haemosporidia. In both coccidia and gregarines secondary departures from the primary type of the life- cycle occur. In coccidia the gametocytes of certain forms (Adeleidce) have acquired the habit of association prior to gamete-formation ; this has not led, however, to a development in the direction of isogamy, as in gregarines, but merely to a reduction in the number of male gametes formed. In some gregarines, on the other hand, notably in those forms of " ccelomic " habitat, or parasitic in the heemoccele, the sporonts in the later stages of growth are inert and motionless ; this condition has led to neogamous association of young sporonts while still motile and capable of coming together proprio motu. Here mention must be made of the remarkable form Schaudinnella de- scribed by Nusbaum (624), parasitic in the gut of an oligochaete worm. The full-grown trophozoites of Schaudinnella are gregarine-like, and may be either free in the lumen of the gut or attached to the epithelium by an epimerite ; the body is non-septate. Temporary associations (syzygies) may be formed which have nothing to do with sexual conjugation, since the associates part again and produce gametes separately and independently. The full-grown sporonts are distinguishable as male and female forms. The female sporonts divide up into eight or ten spherical cells, the macrogametes. The male sporonts divide up into a great number of minute spindle-shaped elements, the microgametes. Copulation takes place between a microgamete and a macrogamete. The zygote may become encysted and cast out with the faeces, or may penetrate into the wall of the intestine. In the first manner infection of new hosts is brought about ; in the second, multiplication of the parasite in the same host. The zygotes in the wall of the intestine grow in size, and divide each into a number of sporozoites. Some doubt may be felt as to whether the life-history of Schaudinnella has been interpreted correctly throughout ; it is unusual for endogenous mult, plication to be preceded by sexual processes, and the development requires further examination. If, however, the account of the gamete-formation be correct, Schaudinnella is a form which in this respect stands very near to the hypothetical ancestral f oerm of gregarines and coccidia. There can be no doubt that the gregarines and coccidia are closely allied in every respect, and that the two groups are distinguished by points of difference which can be referred quite simply to adaptation to slightly different habits in their parasitic life. Bibliography. — For references see p. 494. THE SPOROZOA: II. THE HJEMOSPORIDIA IN the order Haemosporidia are comprised a number of organisms characterized by the following peculiarities : They are parasites of the blood-corpuscles, red or white, of vertebrates during a part of the life-cycle ; like the Coccidia, they exhibit an alternation of generations, non-sexual schizogony and sexual sporogony ; and, in all cases thoroughly investigated up to the present, the alternation of generations corresponds to an alternation of hosts, the schizogony taking plaee in the blood or internal organs of a vertebrate, the sporogony in the digestive tract or other organs of an invertebrate ; lastly, resistant spores are not, as a rule, produced in this order, being rendered unnecessary by the fact that the parasite is never, so to speak, in the open, but always sheltered within the body of one or the other of its two hosts during its entire life-cycle. The Haemosporidia, as the name is generally understood, are a group which comprises a number of forms differing considerably amongst themselves. Some of the types referred at present to this order will, perhaps, when thoroughly investigated, be removed from the order altogether. The existence of these dubious forms renders the precise limits of the group uncertain and ill-defined. All that can be said at present is that the order contains a nucleus of true Haemosporidia presenting very obvious and close affinities with the Coccidia, and, in addition to such forms, certain others, the true affinities of which remain to be determined, but which can be ranked provisionally in the group. Under these circumstances, the occasion is not yet ripe for treating the group in a comprehensive manner, as has been done with Gregarines and Coccidia. The difficulty of dealing with these blood-parasites is enhanced by the fact that there is perhaps no group in the animal kingdom in which the nomenclature-purist has wrought such havoc as in the Haemosporidia. Matters have reached such a pitch that in some cases the popular names of certain forms are more distinctive than their strictly scientific appellations, so that the very raison d'etre of a scientific terminology has been stultified. 356 THE HflGMOSPORIDIA 357 In the sequel, therefore, the Hsemosporidia will be discussed under five principal types, each of which comprises several forms. So far as possible, the " correct " names of these forms will be stated. Finally an attempt will be made to discuss the position and affinities of the group as a whole. The following is a summary of the distinctive characters of the types in question : 1. The Hcemamceba-Type. — The trophozoites of the schizogonous cycle occur within red blood-corpuscles, and are amoeboid ; they produce a characteristic pigment, termed " melanin." When the blood is drawn and cooled down on a slide, the male sporonts, if present, form filamentous male gametes resembling flagella, and are consequently said to " exflagellate." The invertebrate host, BO far as is known, is a mosquito. 2. The Halteridium-Type. — The intracorpuscular trophozoite is a characteristic halter-shaped parasite of red blood-corpuscles, which is amoeboid, and which, like the last, produces melanin-pigment, and " exflagellates " on the slide. Only known from the blood of birds ; the invertebrate host, so far as is known, is a Hippoboscid fly. 3. The Leucocytozoon-Type. — The full-grown sporonts are found within white blood-cells, which are greatly altered by the parasite. They are not amoeboid, and do not produce pigment, but they " exflagellate " when the blood is drawn. Only known in birds ; the invertebrate host is unknown. 4. The Hcemogregarine-Type. — Parasites usually of red blood-cor- puscles, sometimes of white ; they are not .amoeboid, do not produce pigment, and do not " exflagellate." They occur throughout the whole vertebrate series, but are most abundant in cold-blooded vertebrates. Those of fishes, amphibia,- and reptiles, are trans- mitted generally by leeches ; those of mammals and some reptiles apparently by ectoparasitic Arthropods. 5. The Piroplasma - Type. — Parasites of red blood - corpuscles, amoeboid or of definite form ; they do not produce pigment and do not '' exflagellate "; generally very minute. They are known only in mammals, and the invertebrate host is always a tick. These five types will now be considered in more detail. 1. The Hcemamcebce. — The characteristic form of parasite in this section is a minute, amoeba-like organism contained within a red blood-corpuscle ; as it grows it gradually exhausts and destroys the corpuscle, and at the same time produces the characteristic melanin- pigment. Such are the well known malarial parasites of mammals and birds. Unfortunately, the accepted rules of nomenclature render it obligatory to use the generic name Plasmodium for these parasites, a most unsuitable name, since they are not plasmodia in any phase except very temporarily, when they are spondating. They may, however, be termed familiarly " haemamoebae," pro- 358 THE PROTOZOA vided the word be not written in italics or with an initial capital letter ; anything is better than to speak of them as " plasmodia." In human beings three distinct species at least of haemamcebae are recognized — namely, the parasites of tertian, quartan, and pernicious or tropical malaria, now generally named Plasmodium vivax, P. malarias, and P-. falciparum, respectively ; the last-named is distinguished from the other two by the sporonts being crescent- shaped, and was put formerly in a distinct genus, Laverania, which has been abolished. Haemamoebae similar to those causing malaria in man have been described from other mammals — for example, monkeys, several species • bats ; and squirrels. The human malarial parasites go through their sporogony in mosquitoes of the subfamily Anophelinae ; the life-cycle of those of other mammals has not been yet fully investigated. In birds haemamoebae are of very common occurrence. For these Labbe created the genus Proteosoma, a name still in use unofficially as a distinctive appellation ; but the correct name of the avian malarial parasites, commonly assumed to belong all to one species, is variously stated to be Plasmodium prcecox or P. re- lictum. In contrast with the human malarial parasites, those of birds are transmitted by mosquitoes of the subfamily Culicinse. Lastly, parasites are known, from certain reptiles, which are intracorpuscular in habitat, amoeboid in form, and produce pig- ment. Hence they appear to be genuine haemamcebae, but they do not exflagellate when the blood is drawn,* and very little is known of their life-cycle. By some authorities these reptilian forms are referred also to the genus Plasmodium, but it is best for the present to maintain the genus Hcemocystidtum, Castel- lani and Willey, for these reptilian forms. Examples are H. metsch- nikovi (Simond), from an Indian tortoise, Trionyx indicus ; H. simondi, Castellani and Willey, from a Ceylon gecko, Hemidactylus leschenaulti ; and various other species. Since the transmission of the malarial parasites by mosquitoes was first discovered by Ross in his experiments on the Proteosoma- parasite of birds, the development of human malarial parasites has been studied in full detail by numerous investigators, amongst whom Grass! and" Schaudinn (130) must be specially mentioned. Consequently the life-cycle of these parasites is better known than that of almost any other Protozoa, and is now to be found described in every textbook. It will be sufficient, therefore, to describe the life-cycle of the species parasitic in human beings in brief outline, as typical of this class of parasites (Fig. 156). * Aragao and Neiva have observed in Plasmodium (Hasmpcystidium) diploglossi that, in the male gametocytes on the slide, violent streaming movements occur, such as are the prelude, in other haemamoebae, to exflagellation ; but formation of gametes was not seen. THE ILEMOSPORIDIA 359 The sporozoites introduced into the blood by the proboscis of a mosquito are minute active organisms of slender form (Fig. 156, XIX.)- Each sporozoite attacks a red blood-corpuscle and pene- trates into it. Within the corpuscle it becomes a small, amoeboid trophozoite, which grows at the expense of the corpuscle (Fig. 156, I. — V.). A characteristic feature of the young tiophozoite is the possession of a large space — probably a vacuole — in the body, which gives .he parasite an appearance which has been compared to a signet-ring. As the parasite grows, this space disappears and the body becomes compact. The characteristic pigment is formed within the body of the parasite at an early stage of its growth, and as it increases in size the pigment-grains become more numerous. When the parasite is full-grown it is a schizont, and proceeds to multiply by scbizogony (Fig. 156, 6—10). The body becomes rounded by cessation of the amoeboid movement, and the nucleus, hitherto single, multiplies by repeated division. Then as many small daughter-individuals (merozoites) as there are nuclei are budded off round the whole periphery of the schizont, leaving at the centre a small quantity of residual protoplasm containing the pigment-grains ; this is the characteristic rosette-stage, or corps en rosace. The corpuscle now disintegrates, setting free the merozoites. Th three species of human malarial parasites are distinguished by differ- ences in their amoeboid activity, their effects on the corpuscles, the number of merozoites produced, and other points, but more especially by the time required for a complete schizogonous generation. Thus, in Plaamodium vivax 7 the growth and multiplication of the schizont requires about forty-eight hours ; in P. malaria, seventy- two hours ; in P. falciparum, twenty- four hours or an irregular time. The attacks of fever produced by the parasites occur when the rosettes are breaking up and setting free the merozoites, probably because the disintegration of the body of the parasite sets free toxic substances contained in it. Hence in the tertian ague caused by P. vivax the fever returns every third day ; in quartan ague of P. malarias, every fourth day ; while P. falciparum causes irregular or quotidian fevers, more or less continuous. The schizogony of the tertian and quartan parasites proceeds in the peripheral blood, but that of the pernicious parasite takes place more generally in the internal organs. The amoeboid trophozoites present them- selves under the most varied forms in the corpuscles j especialy noteworthy in the quartan parasite is the occurrence of hsemogregarine-like forms (Billet, 664). There is some doubt as to whether the trophozoites are in all cases within, or merely attached to, the corpuscles. Schaudinn (130) held at first the view that in all cases the parasites were intracellular, and that appearances tending to prove the contrary were the result of alterations due to manipulation in making preparations. It is nevertheless maintained by many authors that some stages, at least, of the parasites are attached to the corpuscles ; Halber- staedter and Prowazek, for example, believe that in P. pitheci the trophozoites which develop into female sporonts are extracellular, whilst those which become schizonts are intracellular. Different species of hsemamoebae differ also in the effects they produce on 360 THE PROTOZOA f mil™- FIG. 1 56. — Life-cycle of a malarial parasite : combined diagram (the figures are not in all cases from the same species, and some of them are schematic). All the figures above the dotted line represent stages passed in human blood ; those below are the stages that are found in the mosquito. I. — V. and 6 — 10, Schizogony of the tertian parasite, Plasmodium vivax, after Schaudinn (130), magnified about 1,500 diameters. L, Youngest intracor- puscular stage, which has arisen either from a sporozoite (XIX.) or a merozoite (10) that has penetrated into, or is attached to, the corpuscle (represented by a circular outline). II. — IV., Further stages of the growth of the para- site ; a vacuole is formed in its body which gives it the characteristic " signete ring " appearance (IV.). V. and 6, Later stages of growth ; the vacuol- [Continued at foot of p. 361. THE H^MOSPORIDIA 361 the corpuscles. An effect commonly seen is the so-called " stippling " (Tiipfelung) of the corpuscles, which exhibit a dotted appearance (Schiiffner's dots). The merozoites, when set free, penetrate into other corpuscles, and become in their turn trophozoites, which may either grow into schizonts again and repeat the process of multiplication by schizogony, or may grow into sporonts. As in Coccidia. a number of generations of schizogony. succeed each other before sporonts are produced. At first the parasites are not sufficiently numerous to be perceptible in the blood or to evoke febrile symptoms, and during this, the so-called " incubation-period," schizogony alone occurs, in a.ll probability ; but when the numbers of the parasite are sufficient to affect the health of the host, the reaction of the host against the parasite probably stimulates the production of the propagative phases. The trophozoites which grow into sporonts FIG. 156 continued : disappears ; in 6 the parasite is full-grown and its nucleus is beginning to divide. 7, 8, Progress of the nuclear divisions, complete in 8. 9, Division of the body of the parasite to form the merozoites ; the blood-corpuscle beginning to degenerate. 10, The parasite has divided up intp sixteen mero- zoites, leaving the pigment-grains in a small quantity of residual protoplasm ; the corpuscle has completely disappeared and the merozoites are set free. VI., Vila., VII6., Formation of the gametocytes of pernicious malaria (Plaamodium falciparum) ; the gametocytes arise from the intracorpuscular parasites by a series of stages similar to those represented in II. — V., but without a vacuole in the body. In P. falciparum the ripe gametocytes have the form of crescents, as shown, but in the tertian and quartan parasite*the gametocytes are simply rounded, as Villa, and VIII6. Vila., Male crescent with larger nucleus and scattered pigment ; VII6., female crescent, with a smaller nucleus and the pigment more concentrated round it. (N.B. — Vila, and VII6. are drawn on too small a scale ; the crescent should be as largo as XIII.) VIII. — XIII., Stages of the sexual generation of the tertian parasite in the stomach of the mosquito, after Schaudinn. a, Male forms; 6, female forms. (In pernicious malaria the crescents round themselves off, become free from the corpuscle, and assume forms similar to VIII. a and 6.) VIII., Rounded -off parasites free from the corpuscle. IX., Gamete-forma- tion ; in a the nucleus is divided into eight ; in b the nucleus has passed to the surface of the body. X., Further stage ; in a the body of the gametocyte is throwing off the long slender microgametes,' one of which is represented free ; in 6 the nucleus is dividing to throw off a reduction-nucleus. XI., Process of syngamy ; a male gamete is seen penetrating the body of a female gamete. XII., Zygote shortly after fertilization ; the body is growing out and becoming vermiform, with the synkaryon at the hinder end ; male and female chromatin still distinct ; near the zygote is seen a clump of degenerating microgametes. XIII., Motile obkinete formed from the zygote ; the syn- karyon, with male and female chromatin still distinct, is seen near the middle of the body ; the pigment- grains are at the hinder end of the body, whence they are soon rejected. XIV. — XVIII., Sporogony : diagrammatic. The ookinete (XIII.) pene- trates the stomach- wall and becomes encysted (XIV.) ; its nuclei multiply (XV.), and it forms a number of sporoblasts so caljed (XVI.) ; in each sporo- blast the nucleus divides to form a great number of small nuclei, which grow out in tongue-like processes from the surface to form the sporozoites (XVII.) ; the ripe cyst contains great numbers of sporozoites with a certain amount of residual protoplasm ; the sporozoites when set free (XIX.) pass into the salivary glands, and thence through the proboscis into the blood of the vertebrate again. 362 THE PROTOZOA have, according to Schaudinn (130), no signet-ring stage in their development, but are of compact form, and grow more slowly than the trophozoites which become schizonts. The sporonts are of two types, male and female (Fig. 156, Villa., VIII6.) ; the male forms have a large nucleus and lightly-staining, clearer cytoplasm ; the female forms have a smaller nucleus and more deeply staining cytoplasm. In the tertian and quartan parasites the sporonts are distinguishable from the schizonts by their greater size and more abundant pigment in larger grains. In the parasite of pernicious malaria, the sporonts are further characterized by their sausage- like form (Fig. 156, Vila., VII6.), and are thereby easily dis- tinguishable from the rounded schizonts. The sporonts only undergo further change if taken up by a mos- quito of a species capable of acting as the specific host of the para- site. When human blood containing various stages of the parasite is ingested by a culicine mosquito, all stages of the parasite are digested with the blood ; but if taken up by an anopheline, the ripe sporonts resist the action of the digestive juices of the mosquito, and develop further in its stomach, while all other stages succumb. The sporonts burst the corpuscle in which they are contained, and round themselves off. In the male sporont the nucleus undergoes rapid fragmentation into some four or six nuclei (Fig. 156, IXa.), leaving a residual karyosome at the centre of the body, as in Coccidium (Schaudinn, 99). The daughter-nuclei place themselves at the surface of the body, and grow out with explosive suddenness into fine filaments of chromatin, ensheathed in a scarcely perceptible layer of cytoplasm (Fig. 156, Xa.). Each such filament is a micro- gamete, of slender, spirochaete-like form, without flagella, but endowed with powers of active movement. The microgametes lash about violently, often dragging the body of the sporont after them, and presenting a superficial resemblance to flagella, which, indeed, they were formerly thought to be ; hence the process of microgamete-formation, which can be observed without difficulty in freshly-drawn blood, was thought to represent a flagellated " Polymitus " stage of the parasite, and was termed " exflagella- tion." The microgametes by their movements finally become detached, and swim away from the body of the sporont, which perishes as residual protoplasm. In the female sporont the nucleus divides to give off a reduction- nucleus (Fig. 166, X6.) ; it is then ripe for fertilization by a micro- gamete (Fig. 156, XI.), which penetrates the body and fuses with the female pronucleus. The zygote then changes from a rounded form into an elongated vermicule, termed an " ookinete " (Fig. 156, XII., XIII.), which moves by gliding movements, like a gregarine. The ookinete bores its way through the lining epithelium of the THE HJEMOSPORIDIA 363 gnat's stomach, and comes to rest in the subepithelial tissue ; here it rounds itself off and forms an oocyst (Fig. 156, XIV.), becoming surrounded by a delicate membrane, which is not, however, of a tough and impervious naturelike a coccidian oocyst, since the parasite continues to absorb nutriment and to grow in size, bulging out the stomach-wall towards the body-cavity. As it grows, the originally single nucleus of the zygote multiplies by binary fission, and the cytoplasm becomes concentrated round each nucleus to 'form a " sporoblast," so called (Fig. 156, XV., XVI.). In each sporoblast the nucleus divides repeatedly, and then the surface of the sporo- blast grows out into slender tongue-like processes, each carrying out one of the nuclei in it (Fig. 156 XVII.). Thus a vast number of minute sporozoites are formed by a process of multiplication recalling that seen in the schizogony of Aggregate or Porospora. Finally the cyst contains some hundreds, or even thousands, of sporozoites, together with a certain amount of residual protoplasm, in which the melanin-pigment of the macrogamete is contained (Fig. 156, XVIII.). The ripe cysts burst and scatter their contents in the body-cavity (hsemoccele) of the mosquito ; the sporozoites pass by means of the blood-currents to the salivary glands, in which they collect in vast numbers. The mosquito is now infective ; at its next feed, which is usually the fourth, counting as the first that by which it first took up the parasites in the infected blood, the tiny sporozoites pass with the salivary secretion down the proboscis into the blood of the man on whom the mosquite feeds, and so produce a new infection. A disputed point in the life- cycle is the manner in which relapses are brought about in malarious persons ; as is well knovnv persons who have had malaria may have fresh attacks of the disease under conditions which preclude infec- tion by mosquitoes, and leave no doubt but that the parasite has been present in the body in a latent or inconspicuous condition, and has for some reason reacquired the power of multiplication until its presence becomes perceptible again. Two views have been put forward to explain relapses. According to Schaudinn (130), in the healthy intervals all forms of the parasite have died off except the female sporonts, which are the most resistant forms of the parasite, and maintain their existence in a resting state ; when, however, the conditions occur, whatever they may be, which favour a relapse, the female sj.»oronte multiply parthenogenetically (Fig. 72, p. 137), and produce a brood of merozoites which are the starting-point of a fresh series of schizogonous generations. Ross, on the other hand, believes that in the healthy intervals the number of parasites in the blood merely falls below that sufficient to pro- duce febrile symptoms, and that a relapse is brought about simply by an bic rease in the numbers of the parasites present. The number of cysts formed in the stomach of the mosquito may be very large, 500 or more ; and the cysts themselves vary in size considerably, some developing only a few hundreds of sporozoites, while in others they are to be counted in thousands. Even in mosquitoes of a species susceptible generally to a particular species of malarial parasite, however, the sppronts do not succeed in every case in passing through their sexual stages and developing normally (compare Darling, 669). In many cases also 'the cysts degenerate 364 THE PROTOZOA and form masses of pigment, the so-galled " black spores " of Ross. Similar degeneration-phenomena have been observed by Schaudinn (147) in the oocysts of Cydospora caryolytica, and may be compared to the transformation of chromidia into pigment in the degeneration of Actinosphcerium in cultures (p. 209). The " exflagellation," or formation of microgametes, which takes place, under normal circumstances, in the stomach of the mosquilo, can be seen also in blood freshly drawn and examined on a slide, if ripe sporonts are present. The process is greatly furthered by lowering the density of the blood — for example, by adding to it not more than one-fifth of its volume of ordinary water, or by simply breathing on the blood when drawn (compare Neumann, 677). It is curious that, while so many experimenters have established absolutely beyond all doubt the transmission of haemamcebse by mosquitoes, those of man by anophelines, and those of birds by culicines, no experiments seem to have been performed to determine how long a mosquito, once infected, remains infective without being reinfected. In other cases of similar transmission, such as that of trypanosomes, yellow fever, etc., it is known that the inverte- brate host, once rendered infective, remains so for a very long time, probably for the rest of its life. In the case of malarial parasites this point remains to be tested experimentally. The haemamoebas of Primates have been studied by a number of investigators, and several species distinguished : Plasmodium kochi (Laveran) from the chim- panzee and various African monkeys ; P. pithed from the orang-outang, and P. inui from Macacus spp. (Halberstaedter and Prowazek, Matbjs and Leger, 473) ; P. cynomolgi from Macacus cynomolgus (Mayer, A.P.K., xii., p. 314) ; and P. brasilianum from the ouakari, Brachyurus calvus (Berenberg-Gossler). The schizogony appears to be generally similar to that of the species parasitic in man ; ring-stages occur, and the multiplication is in some cases similar to the tertian, in other cases to the quartan parasite. Binucleate trophozoites are of common occurrence, and binary fission also occurs (Flu, A.P.K., xii., p. 323). A striking feature of monkey-malaria is the comparative rarity of multiplicative phases, which may be in relation to the fact that these parasites cause no appreciable symptoms of disease in their hosts ; in both respects they are comparable to non-pathogenic trypanosomes. Transmission is probably effected by anopheline mosquitoes (Mayer). In bats two distinct forms of intracorpuscular parasites have been described under distinct generic names : Polychromophilus, from Vespertilio and Miniop- terus spp., and Achrematicus, from Vesperugo spp. These two genera are distinguished by the fact that PolychromophUus produces melanin-pigment, and Achromaticus does not. Polychromophilus is apparently an ordinary haemamoeba which should be included in the genus Plasmodium. Achro- maticus, on the other hand, appears, from the recent investigation of Yakimoff and others (753), to be a true piroplasm (see below). Plasmodium vassali from squirrels has ring-like young trophozoites, and its schizogony takes place by binary or multiple fission, more commonly the former (Vassal) ; some forms of the parasite figured resemble Piroplasma. The life-history of the Proteosoma-parasite of birds has been studied in detail by Neumann ; the principal phases of the parasite are essentially similar to those of the hsemamoebse parasitic in man. Experimenting with caharies, Neumann transmitted the infection by means of Stegomyia fasciata, but this mosquito was found to be less efficient as a host for Proteosoma than the species of Culex. Of Stegomyia only 11 '4 per cent, developed ripe cysts, as against 85 per cent, of Culex ; the development of the parasite is accomplished in nine to eleven days in Culex, in thirteen to fifteen days in Stegomyia • and a far smaller number of the parasites succeed in developing in Stegomyia, in which the maximum number of cysts seen in the stomach of any mosquito was thirty-six, while in Culex much larger numbers, 500 to 1,000, are recorded. But little is known of the life-cycle of the reptilian haemamcebae of the genus Hcemocystidium. Aragao and Neiva have described schizogony of the THE ELEMOSPORIDIA 365 ordinary multiple type, taking place in the blood-corpuscles, in H. tropiduri and H. diploglossi. According to Dobell, however, the schizogony of H. simondi consists simply of binary fission as a rule, sometimes of division into four. The male and female gametocytes, sharply differentiated by their staining properties in this as in other species, are stated also to have the nucleus divided into two when mature ; Woodcock (687), however, disputes the correctness of Dobell's interpretations. In no case as yet is the inverte- brate host of any Hoemocystidium known. 2. The Halteridia. — The characteristic form of parasite in this section, only known to occur in the blood of birds, is an organism which is found within the nucleated red corpuscle, and which does not displace the nucleus of the corpuscle, but grows round it into a halter-like form, whence the name Halteridium given to it by Labbe. Hence the parasite is easily distinguished from Proteosoma, which is more compact in form, and which displaces the nucleus of the corpuscle. Halteridium is amoeboid, but the form-changes are generally slight ; it produces the characteristic melanin-pigment in abundance ; and when the blood is drawn, " exflagellation " of the ripe male sporonts takes place very readily. Not merely the gamete-formation, but the subsequent fertilization and the for- mat on of the ookinete, can be observed on the slide. It is in this form that Macallum first followed out the whole process, and so made clear the true significance of the " Polymitus " stage in the malarial parasites. The correct generic name for the HaUeridium-pa,Ta,site is believed to be Hoemoproteus. Labbe considered the halteridia of different birds to be all one species, to which he restricted the specific name danilewskyi (Grassi and Feletti). By other naturalists several species have been distinguished and named after the birds in which they occur, as H. noctuce of the little owl, H. columbce of pigeons, etc. The halteridia of different birds show considerable differences in form, structure, and appearance, and there can be no dou bt that there are many species of these parasites ; but it by no means follows that a given species is restricted to a particular host. It is probable that in some cases one and the same species may be capable of infecting several species of avian hosts. The Sergent brothers were unable, however, to infect canaries with H. columbce of pigeons. The life-cycle of these parasites has been the subject of con- flicting statements. We shall consider first the type of develop- ment made known by the Sergent brothers (686) in part, and more fully by Aragao (Fig. 157). The development described by Schau- dinn (132), to which the utmost doubt attaches, will be dealt with later (p. 390). The invertebrate host of H. columbce is a biting fly of the genus Lynchia, of the dipterous family Hippoboscidrocess at the anterior end, arising from a grain which he regards as a kinetonucleus (" blepharoplast " in the German use of the term), thus con- firming certain obiter dicta of Schaudinn (132, p. 436) with regard to the mero- zoites and sporozoites of the tertian parasite. It may be pointed out that the rostrum of the sporozoites of Gregarines appears to be a perfectly similar structure, which very possibly represents a rudimentary flagellum arising from a true blepharoplast of centrosomic nature. Hartmann' s discovery is therefore more proof of the affinities of proteosoma with other Telosporidia than with Haemoflagellates. The supposed kinetonuclei of piroplasms have been mentioned above ; the entire absence (pace Hartmann) of flagellated stages throughout the life- cycle make it impossible to accept any such interpretation of the nature of these granules so highly inconstant in their occurrence. Lastly it should be mentioned that Schaudinn, and recently Hartmann, have maintained that the microgametes of halteridia and other Haemosporidia have the structure of a trypanosome. Inasmuch as Schaudinn also pointed out the great structural similarity between trypanosomes and spermatozoa, this point might not count for much, even if it were true ; unless the Metazoa also are to be classified amongst the Binucleata, a conclusion which, indeed, seems to follow from the nuclear theory of Hartmann and Prowazek (63). In objects of such extreme minuteness, however, statements ascribing to them complicated details of structure must be regarded with great scepticism until thoroughly substantiated. It is a sufficient warning of the need of caution to bear in mind the controversy that has raged over the question of the minute structure of spirochaetes, with regard to which Schaudinn was obliged to retire from the position he took up at first — namely, that their structure was similar to that of a trypanosome. 3. Possible Transitional Forms. — The parasite of kala-azar was originally described by Laveran under the name Piroplasma donovani,* in the belief that it was a true piroplasm ; and many writers have been struck by the external similarity of the two parasites, in spite of the difficulty in finding in Piroplasma a satisfactory representative of the constant and definite kinetonucleus of Leishmania. In fact these two genera are often cited as the connecting link between Haemoflagellates and Haemosporidia, and are supposed to indicate the course of evolution whereby serum-parasites of the first type became * On the other hand, the parasite of Oriental Sore was first described by Wright under the name Helcosoma tropicum, and referred to the Microsporidia. 394 THE PROTOZOA cell- parasites of the second (compare L4ger and Duboscq, 646). However enticing such a view may seem when only the forms parasitic in the verte- brate hosts are taken into consideration, the facts of the development in the invertebrate hosts must dispel completely any notion of affinity between the two types. Nothing could be imagined more different than the develop- ment of Leishmania, with its typical leptomonad forms (Fig. 140), and that of Piroplasma (Fig. 162), with no flagellated stages at all in its life-cycle. It becomes evident at once that any apparent resemblance between the two genera is due to convergent adaptation induced by a similar mode of parasitism, and that the two forms are in reality poles apart, with no more real affinity than porpoises and fishes, or bats and birds. It is certainly not at this point that any transition from one group to the other is to be sought.* In the foregoing paragraphs an attempt has been made to sum up the arguments for and against the theory tnat the Hsemosporidia are to be removed from the vicinity of the Coccidia,and classified with the trypanosomes and allied forms in an order of the Flagellata. When the evidence on each side is weighed in the balance, in one scale must be placed the complete similarity of the life-cycles of typical Coccidia and Hsemosporidia, a similarity seen in every phase of the life-cycle, and extending even to minor developmental details ; and in the other scale certain cell-granules of doubtful significance. It is almost inconceivable that more importance should be attached to cytological details, the genetic and classifi- catory value of which is at present quite uncertain, than to the homologies of the life-cycle as a whole, in estimating the affinities of the orders of Protozoa ; the more so since even in the Hoemo- flagellates themselves the possession of the binucleatc type of structure does not, apparently, indicate a common ancestry for all members of the group. The conclusion reached is, then, that the Hsemosporidia as a group, excluding doubtful forms insufficiently investigated at present, are closely allied to the Coccidia. It is, indeed, probable that there are two lines of evolution in the group — the one repre- sented _by the hsemamoebse, halteridia, and true leucocytozoa, descended from a Coccidium-like ancestor ; the other represented by the hsemogregarines, from an ancestral form similar to Adelea or Orcheobius. Leger (644) has classified the haemogregarines in the section Adeleidea of the Coccidia, and one may regret that the distinguished French naturalist did not go one step farther and place the haemamcebse in his section Eimeridea (see p. 352, supra). On the other hand, any resemblances which the Hsemosporidia exhibit to trypanosomes and allied forms are due to convergent adaptation on the part of the Flagellates themselves, and more especially to the secondary acquisition by the latter of intracellular * Leger and Duboscq (646), who derive Leishmania and Babesia directly from Crithidia as a common ancestor, do not seem to have taken the development of Babesia (Piroflasma) into consideration at all ; they neither refer to it in their text nor cite any of the relevant memoirs in their bibliography. THE H^EMOSPORIDIA 395 parasitism, and consequent temporary loss of the locomotor apparatus. It may well be, therefore, that some forms now generally included amongst the Haemosporidia (e.g., possibly the drepanidia) may prove, when better known, to be stages of Haemo- flagellates, and to have in reality nothing to do with the true Haemosporidia. Affinities of the Telosporidia. — From the foregoing discussion, the conclusion has been drawn that the Coccidia and the typical Hsemosporidia are closely allied, sufficiently so to be grouped together in a single order, for which the name " Coccidiomorpha " may be used. In a former chapter (p. 354) the relationship of the Gregarines and Coccidia was discussed, and it was pointed out that there was no difficulty in assuming a common ancestral origin for the two groups — a conclusion which, indeed, has never been called in question. The Telosporidia, taken as a whole, may be regarded, therefore, as a homogeneous and natural group, in which the close affinity existing between its constituent members may be regarded as indicating a common phylogenetic origin. If this conclusion be accepted, it remains to discuss the affinities of the Telosporidia as a whole to other groups of Protozoa. It is not unreasonable to suppose that a parasitic group of this kind has been evolved from free-living non-parasitic ancestors, and the question to be discussed is to which of the groups of Protozoa the ancestral form of the Telosporidia belonged. Of the three great classes of the Protozoa, the Infusoria may almost certainly be excluded from consideration in regard to this question, since, in view of the very specialized and definite features of this group, there are no grounds whatever for connecting them with the Telosporidia. There remain, therefore, only the Sarcodina and Mastigophora to be considered. At different times two opposed theories have been put forward with regard to the affinities and ancestry of the Sporozoa. One view sees in them the descendants of typical forms of Sarcodina, such as Amoeba (Awerinzew, 890) ; the other derives them from flagellate ancestors such as are represented at the present day by Euglena or Astasia. It is no longer possible, however, to regard the Sporozoa as a whole as a homogeneous group, and the two so-called " subclasses," Telosporidia and Neosporidia, must be considered separately, each on its own merits. The Nerfsporidia are considered at the end of the next chapter. The question here is of the Telo- sporidia alone. For this group opinion is practically unanimous at the present day in favour of a flagellate ancestry, a theory which must be considered critically. One of the main arguments generally put forward for the theory of the flagellate origin of the Telosporidia is the existence of flagel- 396 THE PROTOZOA lated stages in the life-history. In the first -place, the micro- gametes are very often flagellated, as has been stated frequently in the two foregoing chapters. In the second place, the youngest stages in the development — the merozoites or sporozoites — exhibit structural features which are either those of a flagellate swarm- spore (Hartmann, 675 ; Schaudinn, 132), or can readily be derived from a flagellula in which the flagellar apparatus has become rudi- mentary, as in the sporozoites of gregarines, where the rostrum may be interpreted, with a high degree of probability, as representing a rudimentary flagellum. The existence of flagellated stages of the kinds mentioned in the development of the Telosporidia is by no means, however, a cogent argument for a flagellate ancestry for the group, since quite typical Sarcodina of all orders exhibit flagel- late swarm-spores and gametes. It may be urged that in the case of these types of Sarcodina, also, the existence of flagellate stages indicates a flagellate ancestry ; but such an argument merely evades the question at issue, which is not whether the Telosporidia are derived from Flagellata indirectly through Sarcodine ancestors, but whether or not they are descended directly from ancestors that were typical Flagellata. The existence of flagellated swarm- spores and of gametes representing a modification of such swarm- spores is not sufficient of itself to prove a flagellate ancestry fen: the Telosporidia. Far more cogent arguments for the flagellate affinities of the Telosporidia may be drawn from the characters of the adult forms, especially from the gregarine-type of body, elongated and ver- micular in character, and perfectly definite and constant in form, which occurs in every group of the Telosporidia at one point or another in the life-history. Such a type of body can be readily derived, as Butschli (2) pointed out, from an organism similar to Astasia or Euglena, in which the flagellar apparatus has been lost, and all special organs of nutrition, whether holozoic or holophytic, have disappeared in- relation with the parasitic mode of life. On the other hand, the gregarine-type of body cannot be derived from the adult forms of the Sarcodina, which are typically amoeboid, and without any definite body-form other than that imposed by the physical nature of their body-substance. We may therefore consider the ancestral form of the Telosporidia to have been a flagellate organism with an elongated form of body, with a definite form, owing to the presence of a cuticle of a certain degree of thickness and toughness, and with a flagellar apparatus at the anterior end. Such a form would have been not unlike the leptomonads now found commonly as parasites of insect-guts ; but there is no reason to suppose the ancestral form to have had a kinetonucleus and the third type of flagellar insertion. Such a THE ILEMOSPORIBIA 397 form probably used its flagellum for the purpose of attaching itself to the epithelium of the digestive tract, as leptomonads do now (compare Figs. 136, 137) ; and from this primitive type of attach- ment the epimerite of the gregarines may have been derived by secretion of chitin round the attaching flagellum, just as the primitive tuft of fixing cilia, the " scopula" of the primitive Vorticellids appears to become converted into the chitinous stalks of such forms as Epistylis (p. 441). The conclusion drawn from these various considerations is, therefore, that the Telosporidia may be regarded as a group de- scended from flagellate ancestors modified in adaptation to a para- sitic mode of life ; not, however, specially from flagellates of the " binucleate " type of structure. Bibliography. — For references see p. 496. CHAPTER XVI THE SPOROZOA : III. THE NEOSPORIDIA A TYPICAL member of the subclass Neosporidia is a parasite of which the life-cycle is initiated by the liberation from the spore of one or more amoebulae within the body of the host, in the digestive tract in all known cases. For this initial amcebula-phase Stempell's term, planont (i.e., " wanderer "), may be employed conveniently, since in no case does it remain in the lumen of the digestive tract, but penetrates into the wall of the gut, and in most cases migrates thence into some organ or tissue of the host, where it lives and multiplies actively, being usually at this stage an intracellular parasite, in some cases, however, occurring free in the blood or lymph. The planont-phase is succeeded typically by a plasmodial phase, which arises in some cases by simple growth of the amcebula (probably then a zygote), accompanied by multiplication of its nuclei ; in other cases by association together and cytoplasmic fusion of at least two distinct amoebulae, of which the nuclei remain separate. The plasmodial stage is very characteristic of this sub- class ; it represents the principal or " adult " trophic phase of the parasite, and is also the spore-forming phase ; and, as the name Neosporidia implies, the production of spores begins, as a rule, when the plasmodium is still young, and continues during its growth. In some cases, however, no plasmodium is formed, but the planont-phase is succeeded by uninucleate " meronts " or schizonts, which multiply by fission and give rise ultimately to sporonts in which spore-formation sets a limit to the growth. In such forms the general course of the life-cycle is not essentially different in any way from that of a member of the Telosporidia, such as Coc- cidium. The tendency, therefore, of many Neosporidia to form spores during the trophic phase cannot be used to frame a rigorously- exact definition of the group. A more distinctive characteristic of the subclass is the complete absence of flagellated phases in any part of the life-cycle, and more especially the fact that 398 THE NEOSPOR1DIA 399 the sporozoites are always, apparently, amcebulse, and never gregarinulse.* The Neosporidia are divisible into two sections, known re- spectively as the Cnidosporidia and the Haplosporidia. The Cnidosporidia are distinguished by the possession in the spore of peculiar structures termed polar capsules, which are lacking in the Haplosporidia. A polar capsule (Fig. 163) is a hollow, pear-shaped body, with a tough envelope, probably chitinoid in nature. It is situated at one pole of the spore, with its pointed end immediately below the surface, in continuity with a minute pore in the sporocyst. Coiled up within the capsule is a delicate filament, often of great length, probably of the same natur& as the capsule, and continuous with it. Under suitable stimu- lation the polar filament is shot out through the pore in the sporocyst. In their structure the polar capsules resemble the nematocysts of the Ccelentera. Each polar capsule is formed within a capulogenous cell. The Cnidosporidia comprise four orders — the Myxosporidia, Actinomyxidia, Micro- sporidia, and Sarcosporidia. The Haplo- spcjridia constitute an order apart. Order I. : Myxosporidia. — This order is characterized chiefly by the following points : The principal trophic phase is a multinucleate plasmodium of relatively large size, resembling an amoeba in its appearance and movements. The spores are also relatively large, and exhibit typically a binary symmetry, having a sporocyst composed of two valves and usually two polar capsules, sometimes increased in number to four, rarely reduced to one. The Myxosporidia comprise a great number of genera and species, parasitic for the most part in cold-blooded vertebrates, especially fishes, in which they are found very commonly. They are not as yet krown as parasites of birds or mammals, but a few species are known from invertebrate hosts. Myxosporidia are typically tissue-parasites, occurring in various tissues of the body, by preference muscular or connective, but also * A possible exception to this statement is furnished by the family Caelospor- idiidcB of the Haplosporidia (p. 424). But the position of all the forms in this order is more or less questionable, and their attachment to the typical Neosporidia is still probationary. FIG. 163. — Polar cap- sules of the spores of Myxosporidia. a, Polar capsule with the filament coiled within it ; 6, with the filament partly ex- truded ; c, d, with the filament completely extruded. After Balbiani. 400 THE PROTOZOA end.— other classes of tissue. A few species are known to attack the nervous system — for instance, Lentospora (Myxdbolus) cerebralis, cause of " Drehkrankheit " in Salmonidce (Plehn), and Myxobolus neurobius of trout (Schuberg and Schroder). In the tissue attacked the parasite may be concentrated at one spot, so as to form a dis- tinct cyst visible to the naked eye ; or parasite and tissue may be mixed up together in a state of " diffuse infiltration " such that microscopic examination is required to detect the parasite, and as its body becomes used up, to form spores, the tissue becomes in- filtrated with vast numbers of spores lying singly or in groups between the cells. In many species of Myxosporidia, on the other hand, the spore- forming plasmodial phase is found in cavities of the body — not in any known instance in the lumen of the digestive tract, but frequently in the gall-bladderor urinary bladder of the host. In such cases the parasite may lie quite freely in the cavity it inhabits, or may be attached by its pseudopodia to the lining epi- thelium ; in the latter case the attachment is purely mechanical, and does not involve injury to the epithelial cells. As might be expected, the Myxo- sporidia parasitic in tissues are often very deadly to their hosts, and are sometimes the cause of severe epidemics among fishes. Those species, on the other hand, which inhabit cavities with natural means of exit from the body appear to be as harmless to their hosts as are the majority of parasitic Protozoa in nature. The adult trophic phase is usually a large amoeba-like organism with a distinct ectoplasm and endoplasm. In some species the ectoplasm, which appears to be purely protective in function, ex- hibits vertical striations, or is covered by a fur of short, bristle-like processes, the nature and significance of which are uncertain — as, for example, Myxidium lieberkuhni, the common parasite of the urinary bladder of the pike (Esox luciua). The form of the body1 changes constantly, with extrusion of pseudopodia, which are used for locomotion to a limited extent, more often for fixation, but never for food-capture. They may, however, by increasing the body-surface, increase also the power of absorption of food- FIG. 164. — CUoromyxum leydigi, parasite of the gall-bladder of the dogfish, skate, etc. ; trpphozoite (plasmodium) in an active state. ect., Ectoplasm ; end., endoplasm ; y.t yellow globules in the endo- plasm ; sp., spores, each with four polar capsules. After Thelohan, from Minchin, magnified 525. THE NEOSPORIDIA 401 B stuffs by diffusion, the method by which the organism, like other sporozoan parasites, obtains the required nourishment. The pseu- dopodia vary in form in different species, from coarsely lobose and blunt to fine filaments ending in sharp points. In some species the formation of pseudopodia is localized at one pole of the body, termed " anterior," and in such cases a peculiar propulsive pseudo- podium ('^Stemm-pseudopodium") may be developed at the posterior pole like a tail, which by its elongation pushes the body forward.* The endoplasm is distinguished from the ectoplasm by its coarsely granular appearance. In addition to numerous nuclei and stages of spore-formation, the endoplasm may contain various metaplastic products, such as crystals, pig- ment-grains, fat-globules, etc. ; but never food-vacuoles or solid ingested food-particles. The plasmodial trophozoite forms spores in its endoplasm, as a rule, during the whole period of growth, but may also multiply by plasmotomy. In Myxidium lieberkiihni, for example, plas- motomy proceeds actively during the summer months, and leads to the wall of the pike's bladder being carpeted with the slimy, orange - coloured plasmodia, the presence of which can generally be detected at a glance ; spore- formation, on the other hand, takes place almost exclusively during the colder months of the year. Spore-formation in the Myxosporidia is a somewhat complicated process, and is accompanied by sexual phenomena, which are commonly stated to be autogamous, but which are probably nothing of the sort. There is a slight difference between the mode of spore-formation in the Disporea, in which each trophozoite produces but two spores, and the Polysporea, which produce many. * Auerbach (758, p. 11) seems to have mistaken altogether the (significance of Doflein's " Stemm-pseudopodium," and applies the term to the anterior pseudo- podia, which appear to be rather tactile in function in such oases. 26 young wliioh FIG. 165. — Leptoffieea agili»: plasmodial trophozoite* in the spore-formation has not begun. A, Individual moving forward by means of the " Stemm-pseudopp- diurn " (st. pa.) ; B, individual in which only the anterior pseudopodia are developed. After Doflein. 402 THE PROTOZOA c.m/\ H FIG 166. — For description see foot of opposite page. THE NEOSPORIDIA 403 An example of the Disporea is Ceratomyxa drepanopsettce, of which the spore-formation is described by Awerinzew (759). The trophozoite has at first only two nuclei, which are considered by Awerinzew to be derived, " beyond all doubt," from division of a single nucleus ; it seems far more probable, on the contrary, that the binucleate trophozoite is to be derived from the association and fusion of two distinct planonts. In the binu- cleate trophozoite each nucleus divides by karyokinesis into two nuclei, a larger and a smaller (Pig. 166, A). The two smaller nuclei are vegetative, the two larger generative, in function. Round each of the two generative nuclei the protoplasm becomes concentrated so as to form two cells which lie embedded in the endoplasm of the trophozoite. These two cells are usually of distinctly different sizes, and represent a microgametocyte and a macro- gametocyte respectively. Each gametocyte next divides into two gametes (Fig. 166, B, C, D), and in each gamete a certain amount of chromatin is extruded from the nucleus, first into the cytoplasm of the gamete, and then into the endoplasm of the mother-trophozoite. Then each microgamete copulates with one of the two macrogametes (Fig. 166, E, F). The two zygotes thus formed represent the sporoblasts, each of which forms a spore independently of the other. Each sporoblast divides into two cells, a larger and a smaller (Fig. 166, Q), and the smaller divides again into two (Fig. 166, H) ; the result is an aggregate of three cells : a larger, which gives rise ultimately to the two parietal cells which form the valves of the sporocyst, and may be termed the " sporocyst- mother-cell " ; and two smaller cells, one of which is the mother-cell of the two capsulogenous cells, the other the future sporozoite or amcebula. The sporocyst-mother-cell may become temporarily separate from the capsule- mother-cell and the amcebula. The three cells of the previous stage build up the spore in the following manner : The sporozoite grows in size, and its nucleus divides into two. The capsule-mother-cell divides into two capsulogenous cells, each of which forms a polar capsule in its interior. The amcebula and the two capsulogenous cells are placed close together and arranged in a definite manner (Fig. 166, /). The sporocyst-mother-cell divides into two parietal cells (Fig. 166, J), which place themselves on either side of the cell-complex composed of the associated amcebula and capsulogenous cells (Fig. 166, K), and each secretes one valve of the sporocyst enveloping the whole complex. Thus the trophozoite consists finally of -an amoeboid body containing two Fia. 166. — Spore-formation in Ceratomyxa drepanopsettce. A, Trophozoite sketched in outline, showing in the plasmodium two generative nuclei (he sporonts and spores in the central protoplasmic region of the cyst. Classification. — The two types of the trophic phase that have been de- scribed in the foregoing paragraphs have been utilized by Perez (779) to sub- divide the Microsporidia into two suborders, as given below. Stempell (785), on the other hand, divides the group into three families ; the un- certainty that prevails at present with regard to the exact structure of the trophic phases in some forms is a hindrance to finality in the classification of this order. SUBORDER I. : SCHIZOGENEA (seu Oligosporea). — The principal trophic phase is a uni nucleate meront which multiplies by fission, and from which the sporont finally arises. Several genera, characterized by the number of spores produced by the sporont : One spore, Nosema ; two spores, Perezia ; four spores, Gurleya ; eight spores, Thelohania ; sixteen spores, Duboscqia (see below) ; n spores, Pleistophora ; but Stempellia (Leger and Hesse, 775), for S. mutabilis, parasite of the fat- body of Ephemerid larvae, produces spores to the number of eight, four, two, or one indifferently ; Octosporea, the species of which are parasitic in Muscidce, produces eight spores in one species, one in another. These anomalies indicate that the classification by the number of spores produced by the sporont is purely artificial (Chatton and Krempf). Telomyxa glugei- formis (Leger and Hesse), also from the fat-body of Ephemerid larvae, pro- duces t?ight, sixteen, or »--spores, and stands apart from all other known Microsporidia in possessing two polar capsules in the spore. SUBORDER II. : BLASTOOENEA (seu Polysporea). — The principal trophic phase is a multinucleate plasmodium producing sporonts by internal cleavage ; example : Glugea. To this section, also, the peculiar form Myxocystis has been referred, which was discovered by Mrazck in the body-cavity of Oligo- chaetes. Myxocystis occurs in the form of large masses floating freely in the body-cavity, each mass remarkable for an envelope composed of a fur of vertical filaments, not unlike stiff cilia, and enclosing nuclei and spores in various stages of development. According to the most recent investigations of Mrazek, however, each of these masses represents in reality a lymphocyte containing numerous parasites, which multiply and form spores, and provoke a great hypertrophy of the host-cell, accompanied by multiplication of its nucleus. Hence the true Myxocystis is an intracellular parasite referable, apparently, to the order Schizogenea, and characterized chiefly by the peculiar form of its. spores. Duboscqia legeri, Perez (780), from the body-cavity of Termes luctfugus, is perhaps an organism of similar nature ; it is described THE NEOSPORIDIA 419 as a floating plasmodium in which sporonts arise, each of which produces sixteen spores ; it has, however, been referred by its discoverer to the Blasto- genea. Order IV. : Sarcosporidia. — The parasites of this_order are con- sidered at present to constitute a single genus, Sarcocystis, with numerous species. In contrast to the three orders of Cnidosporidia dealt with in the foregoing pages, the Sarcosporidia are pre-eminently parasites of the higher^ vertebrates, more especially of mammals, occurring occasionally, though rarely, in man (see Darling) ; but they are known also to occur in avian and reptilian hosts, though sparingly. On the other hand, no Sarcosporidia are known to be parasitic in invertebrate hosts of any kind. In their hosts the Sarcosporidia are tissue-parasites, occurring principally in the striped muscles, but occasionally in unstriped. In a few cases they are found in connective tissue, but this appears to be a secondary condition in which a parasite living first in the muscle-fibres becomes free from them at a later period. As a general rule the Sarco- sporidia appear to be harmless parasites, which do not make their presence known by any symptoms of disease, and can only be detected by post-mortem examination. Some species, however, are an exception to this rule, and are extremely pathogenic to their host — for example, Sarcocystis muris of the mouse. The extent to which the health of the host is impaired appears to be directly pro- portional to the numbers of the parasite in the body, and conse- quently to the power which a given species may possess of multiplying and overrunning the host. In most species the capacity for endogenous multiplication appears to be extremely limited. In spite of the fact that Sarcosporidia are very common parasites of domestic animals, and have been found frequently in man, our knowledge of their structure and life-history is ULJI very backward state. As a rule Sarcosporidia present themselves as opaque, whitish bodies, usually elongated and cylindrical in form, encysted in the muscle- fibres of the infected animal, and known commonly as " Miescher's tubes." They are distinctly visible to the naked eye, and often very large. Sarcocystis tenella of the sheep reaches a length of 16 millimetres, while in the roebuck (Cervus capreolus) cysts of 50 millimetres in length are recorded. The Miescher's tube, when examined microscopically, is seen to be a body of complex structure, and consists chiefly of vast numbers of sickle- shaped spores — " Rainey's corpuscles " — lying in clumps or bunches contained in chambers separated off from one another by partitions. The whole organism is enclosed by a distinct envelope, often ex- hibiting vertical striations, and the partitions between the chambers containing the sporos are continuations of the envelope. The exact 420 THE PROTOZOA structure of the spores is still a matter of dispute, and it is possible that there is more than one kind of spore even in the same species of parasite. A remarkable feature of the spores — in some species, at least — is that they are motile when set free : for example, in S. muris. They are also extremely delicate structures, easily injured by external media, in marked contrast to the spores of the other orders of Cnidosporidia. The spores of 8. muris, S. bertrami (of the horse), and 8. tenella, reproduce them- selves by division (Negri, Fiebiger, Teichmann). Finally it must be mentioned that the spores of Sarcosporidia contain a true toxin, which was named by Laveran and Mesnil " sarcocystine." Its properties have been investigated recently by Teichmann (25) and Teichmann and Braun (26). The natural mode of transmission of the Sarcosporidia remains to be discovered. It was found by Theobald Smith that mice could be infected experimentally with S. muris by feeding them with the flesh of other infected mice ; but it is extremely unlikely that cannibalism is the method whereby sheep and other ruminants become infected with these parasites. All experiments indicate that the spores germinate in the digestive tract of the new host ; but the delicate nature of the spores seems to preclude any possi- bility of the occurrence of ordinary contaminative infection, as in other Cnidosporidia. In this connection attention should be drawn to the statement of Watson, that the spores are to be found in the circulating blood, indicating the possibility of transmission by an intermediate host. In spite of several recent investigations upon the structure and develop- ment of the Sarcosporidia, the subject is in a confused state, even the structure of the spores being still disputed. It is therefore difficult to obtain a clear notion of the course of the life-cycle in these organisms. According to Laveran and Mesnil, the spores of S. tenetta (Fig. 175) are sausage-shaped bodies, curved, with one end more pointed than the other. At the pointed end is a striated structure representing a polar capsule, and at the blunt end is a nucleus, while the middle of the body is occupied by coarse, deeply-staining, metachromatinic grains. Watson also figures a large nucleus near the blunt end of the spore, and places the polar capsule at the pointed end. Negri also describes the spores of S. muris and ronts (" pansporo- blasts "), which give rise each to a cluster of spores (Polysporulea). The spores are usually simple rounded bodies invested by a more or less distinct protective membrane, which in rare instances becomes a definite sporocyst prolonged even into tails or spikes. The Haplosporidia were divided by Caullery and Mesnil (802) into three families. In order to include forms more recently dis- covered, Ridewood and Fantham have extended the classification, and recognize two suborders : 424 . . THE PROTOZOA SUBORDER I. : OUQOSPORULEA. — The plasmodium divides at once into sporoblast s, each of which becomes a single spore. Family Haplosporidttda. — Spores with a double envelope, the outer some- times prolonged into tails or processes. Genera : Haplosporidium, Urospor- idium, and Anurosporidium ; all the known species are parasitic in Annelids. Family Bertramiidce. — Spores with a simple envelope, or with none. Bertramia, with several species : B. capitellce* parasite of the coelome of Capitdla cfipitata ; B. dsperospora, a common parasite of the body-cavity of Rotifers. B. Jrirkmanni, described by Warren from Rotifers in Natal, is stated to have several nuclei and a vacuole in the spore, and appears to belong to a distinct genus. In this family the genus Ichthyosporidium is ranked provisionally, as the mode of spore-fprmation is unknown as yet. Ichthyosporidium is a common parasite of fishes, often lethal to an extreme degree. It occurs in the form of plasmodia, sometimes irregular, sometimes more or less spherical in form, scattered in various organs, but usually in the muscles or the connective tissue ; the plasmodium contains numerous vesicular nuclei with distinct karyosomes, and may be naked at the surface, or marked off from the sur- rounding tissues by a membrane or envelope, often of considerable thick- ness. The plasmodia multiply actively by plasmotomy, and an intense infection is produced. Parasites with a single nucleus are also found, which may either represent the planbnt stage, or may be derived from the division of a plasmodium ; from them the plasmodial stage arises by multiplication of the nuclei. No other stage of the parasite is known, and the method of transmission remains to be discovered. Bertramia bufonis, described by King (Proc. Acad. Sci. Philad., 59, p. 273), is possibly a species of Ichthyosporidium or allied to this genus. Family Codosporidiidce, for the genera Codosporidium, Mesnil and Marchoux and Pdycaryum, Stempell : All the species known are parasites of Crustacea (Phyllopoda and Cladocera). The plasmodium forms globules of fatty substance in the interior ; it becomes encysted as a whole, and breaks up into sporozoite-like bodies within the cyst. Caullerya mesnili, Chatton (803), parasite of the epithelium of the mid-gut of Daphnia spp., produces, by fragmentation of the plasmodium, spores with resistant envelopes containing each about thirty nuclei. Chatton considers it to be intermediate between the Haplosporidiidce and Ccelo- sporidiidoe ; possibly it should be referred to the next suborder. Blastulidium pcedophthorum, Perez, referred to this family, is, according to Chatton (804), a Chytridinian. Coelosporidium blatdlce, Crawley, is referred by L6ger (C.R.A.S., cxlix., p. 239) to the genus Pdtomyces (Myce- tozoa, p. 243). SUBORDER II. : POLYSPORULEA. — The plasmodium divides into sporonts, each of which produces a cluster of spores. Two genera, each with a single species : Neurosporidium cephalodisci, from the nervous system of Cephahdiscus nigrescent (Ridewood and Pantham) ; and Rhinosporidium Tcinealyi, from the septum nasi of human beings in India (Minchin and Fantham ; Beattie) ; a case has also been observed in America (Wright). Rhinosporidium causes vascular pedunculated growths or tumours, resembling raspberries, in the septum nasi or floor of the nose. In sections of the growth, great numbers of the parasite are found embedded in the connective tissue, while the mature cysts may be in the stratified epithelium (Wright). The youngest parasites are rounded cells with a single nucleus and a distinct envelope (Beattie). By division of the nucleus the parasite becomes a multinucleate plasmodium, the so-called " granular stage," often of irregular form, but this may be due to the action of the preserving reagents. Older parasites are spherical, with the envelope thickened to form a thick transparent cyst, external to which a nucleated envelope is formed by cells of the connective tissue (Beattie). The contents of the cyst (Fig. 177, A) become divided up into numerous THE NEOSPORIDIA 425 uninucleate sporonts (" pansporoblasts ") towards the centre or at one pole, while the peripheral zone or the opposite pole remains in the plasmodial condition. The sporonts grow in size, and at the same time multiply by repeated fission to form a cluster of about sixteen spores, a "spore-morula" (Fig. 177, B), enclosed by a membrane. Between the spore-morulae an indefinite framework is formed by the residual protoplasm in which the sporonts have developed (Beattie). Hence the full-grown parasite exhibits three zones, which may be concentric or polar in arrangement : a plasmodial region, peripheral or polar ; an intermediate zone of spore-formation; and a central or polar region containing ripe spore-morulae. The process of spore -formation continues until the whole cyst is full of spore-morulae. The ripe cysts burst and scatter their contents in the tissues. It is possible that spores set free in this way may germinate in the tissues and give rise to fresh cysts ; but it is more probable that the spores, if they escape the phagocytes, are dis- charged from the surface of the epithelium. From the analogy of other Neosporidia, it is reasonable to suppose that the youngest uni- nucleate forms of the parasite are the multiplicative phase in the tissues, and that the spore-morulae represent the propagative phase. Nothing is known, however, of the mode of transmission of the para- site or of the manner in which the infection is acquired. A parasite is described by Laveran and Pettit from Salmo irideus, which in the opinion of the authors presents affinities with Rhinosporidium and Neuro- sporidium. It causes a disease in the fish, termed in German " Taumelkrankheit." IZ- ex.— ft? FIG. 177. — Rhinosporidium kinealyi. A, Segment of a section through a cyst : e., hyaline envelope ; p. z., peripheral zone of pansporoblasts ; i.z., inter- mediate zone of pansporoblasts contain- ing a few spores; c.z., central zone of ripe spore-morulfB; B, ripe spore-morula ; m., membrane ; sp., spores. After Minchin and Fantham. In addition to the more or less typical genera of Haplosporidia mentioned in the foregoing para- graphs, a number of other forms have been described, of which the affinities and systematic position re- main for the present uncertain. Such are the " Serumsporidia " of Pfeiffer, and other forms, for a review of which the reader must be referred to the comprehen- sive memoir of Caullery and Mesnil (802) or to the original descriptions. The remarkable form, Schewiakovdla schmeili, however, presents peculiarities which deserve special mention. It is a parasite of the body-cavity of Cyclops spp., and was the subject of detailed study by Schewiakoff. In the active con- dition it occurs as an amoeba with a single nucleus and a contractile vacuole, or as a plasmodium formed by fusion of such amoebae. Encystment of either the amoebae or the plasmodia occurs, and within the cyst a number of simple, uninucleate spores are formed, which, although possessing a distinct envelope, multiply further by fission, with mitosis of the nucleus. Germination of the spores sets free small amcebulae. In many points this form is unique amongst the Sporozoa, and should perhaps be classed rather with the parasitic amoebae. Incertce Sedis.^-Ia. conclusion a number of forms must be mentioned which have been referred to the Neosporidia, but of which the position and afliinities are quite doubtful. 426 THE PROTOZOA Under the generic name Microklossia, Krassiltschik has described certain cell-parasites of caterpillars, which appear to belong to the Neo- sporidia, though it is not possible to assign the genus to a definite position, since the structure of the spores has not been made out, and the account given of the life-cycle requires revision. According to Krassiltschik, the cycle begins with non-sexual schizogony ; the nucleus of the schizont divides into four or eight nuclei, and as many merozoites are produced within the body of the schizont. Schizogony is succeeded by formation of " macronts " and " micronts " which give rise to gametes ; the macront by a process of fission similar to the schizogony produces four to eight macrogametes, while the micront produces in a similar way two, four, or eight, microgametes. The nucleus of the macrogamete divides to form two reduction-nuclei. The microgamete attaches itself to one pole of the macrogamete, and its nucleus passes over into the cytoplasm of the latter and fuses with the female pro- nucleus. In the zygote the synkaryon buds off daughter-nuclei, round which the cytoplasm of the zygote is condensed to form internal buds — " pro- toblasts." The protoblasts are set free, and produce in their turn "deuto- blasts," which are set free, become amoeba-like, multiply in the blood of the insect, and infect the tissues and organs of the host, especially the fat- body and the wall of the digestive tract. In the fat-body the deutoblasts produce a generation of " tritoblasts " which multiply actively and spread amongst the tissue. From the tritoblasts arise finally a generation of " teloblasts," which divide each into a rosette of small cells, the definitive sporoblasts, round a central residual mass. Each sporoblast produces a spore, a smooth", strongly refractile body, ellipsoidal or egg-shaped, in which no details of structure could be made out. The spores appear to be produced in the wall of the digestive tract, whence they are set free with the faeces. The concluding phases suggest a Nosema-type, but the earlier part of the life-cycle, if correctly described, appears to be a type sui generis. Under the name Lymphocystis johnstonei, Woodcock (824) described a parasite of plaice and flounders, which forms conspicuous cysts in the lymph- spaces of the skin and mesentery. Each cyst (Pig. 178) contains a single parasite, which may attain 1-6 millimetres in diameter, and shows a remarkable structure. The body is enclosed by a thick, structureless membrane, and contains at the centre a very large nucleus, irregular in shape, staining feebly, and containing a number of karyosomes in a faintly-staining reticulum. Surrounding the nucleus is a chromidial network forming a ring or zone of considerable thickness, filling the greater part of the cytoplasm between the nucleus and the envelope. The outermost zone of the chromidial net may contain a series of small, clear " spherules." According to Awerinzew (815 and 816), the youngest stages of Lymphocystis are minute cells with a single nucleus which grow very* rapidly, and as they do so the chromatin passes out of the nucleus to form the chromidial ring. The spherules are masses of plastin which separate from the chromidial net. From the chromidia secondary nuclei are formed, round which a portion of the cytoplasm is cut off to form small cells, termed by Awerinzew " secondary amceboids," and compared by him to the sporonts of Olugca. Within the secondary amceboids spores are formed, of which, however, the structure has not been made out clearly. In teased-up preparations of Lymphocystis, Awerinzew found spores similar to those of Henneguya, and proposed to place the parasite in that genus. He has now become doubtful, however, whether the Henneguya-spoTes belong to the Lymphocystis or to a distinct parasite, since he was unable to demonstrate a similar structure in the spores found in the secondary amoeboids. Awerinzew is of opinion, nevertheless, that Lymphocystis should be referred to the Cnidosporidia, but this form requires further investigation. Toxocystis homari, Leger and Duboscq (646), is a parasite of the posterior intestinal caecum of lobsters. In appearance it resembles a hsemogregarine, motionless, with granular cytoplasm and a small karyosomatic nucleus at the middle of the body ; there are also usually two, sometimes one, " para- THE NEOSPORIDIA 427 nuclear bodies," round masses larger than the nucleus, and staining very in- tensely with nuclear stains. The parasite occurs between the basal membrane and the epithelium, or in the epithelial cells, or occasionally free in the lumen of the caecum. Multiplication appears to take place by longitudinal fission. No other stages are known. Oastrocystis gilruthi, Chatton (819), is a parasite of sheep and goats dis- covered by Gilruth in Australia, but of common occurrence in Europe. The parasite appears as a cyst, visible to the naked eye, in the mucous membrane of the stomach. The cyst has an envelope formed by a single cell with a large nucleus ; the envelope is concentrically striated, and bears externally a fur of short, stiff, bristle-like processes, recalling the covering of Myxidium lieberkuhni, Myxocystis, and Sarcosporidia. The younger cysts contain a plasmodium with a vast number of nuclei, some of them in groups of two, three, four, and so on up to a large number, which are then arranged in a fcingle layer en- closing a blastula-like sphere or blastophore. The blastophore becomes separated off from the interstitial protoplasm of the plasmodium, and each nucleus grows out from the surface in a tongue-like process to form a cluster of sporozoite-like bodies or germs in a manner very similar to the sporulation of a malarial parasite or of Porospora or Aggregata. The ripe cyst is full of an enormous number of these germs (Pig. 179), each of which is a fusiform body, about :o. 178. — Lymphocystis johnstonei : section though one of the parasites lying in the mesentery. N., The large nucleus of the parasite ; chr., the ring of chromidia ; I.e., lymph - space ; I., layer of lymphocytes adherent to the parasite. After Woodcock (824), magnified 45 diameters. 10 A* in length, with one end pointed and terminating in a rostrum, the other blunter. Near the blunt end is a largo nucleus, and at about the middle of the body is a deeply-staining mass resembling a separate karyosome or a kinetonucleus. The surface of the germ is clothed by a delicate pellicle. The germs are set free from the cyst by dehiscence. The affinities of Oastrocystis remain for the present quite uncertain. Negre reports the occurrence of a similar cyst in the duodenum of a mouse of which the faeces infected other mice with sarcosporidiosis (see p. 421), and suggests that Oastrocystis may be a stage in the development of Sarcosporidia. Panspordla perplexa, Chatton (818), is a parasite of the intestine of Daphnia spp., occurring in the form of amoeboid bodies, reaching 80 /* in diameter, adherent, but not permanently attached, to the epithelium of the intestinal wall. The amoeboid movement may be active, but does not serve for food- capture, since nutrition is effected by the osmotic method. The cytoplasm is divided into hyaline ectoplasm and granular endoplasm containing a single large nucleus in which the karyosome has the form of one or two caps adherent to the nuclear membrane. The amoeboid phase does not multiply by fission, but becomes encysted, and then the nucleus divides repeatedly until a large number of small nuclei are present. The body then becomes divided into a number of spores, each containing eight nuclei, of which six degenerate, so that the ripo spore is binucleate. Germination of the spore sets free a binucleate amcebula which divides, apparently, into two, each of which has 428 THE PROTOZOA a single nucleus and grows up into the adult amoeba-like phase. Sexual phe- nomena have not been observed, though their occurrence is indicated by the development described. Chatton considers that the parasite Has resemblances to Amoebaea, Mycetozoa; and Sporozoa. Chytridiopsis, Schneider. — Leger and Duboseq (823) describe several species parasitic in the intestine of insects, and have followed out the development of G. socius. The youngest form is a minute amoebula which penetrates into an epithelial cell, and grows, with multiplication of its nuclei, to form a plasmodium or schizont, which then divides up to form a mass of uninuoleate " schizozoites," each one at first crescent-shaped, then amoeboid. The schizozoites are set free in the intestine, and penetrate other cells ; they either grow into schizonts, which repeat the process of schizogony, or into garneto- cytes. Certain schizozoites grow within the cells without multiplication of the nuclei till they attain a diameter of about 10 M ; then the nucleus divides rapidly, and a number of microgametes are formed. Other scnizozoites become macrogametes, which are about 8 M in diameter and appear to be fertilized each by a microgamete. The nucleus of the zygote divides into a great number of nuclei, three or four of which travel to the surface of the spherical body and form a cyst- envelope ; the remaining nuclei retain their central position, and the body of the zygote divides into uni- nucleate spores. In this way resistant cysts are formed containing a large number of spores, each containing a single nucleus and a vacuole. The cysts are cast out of the body and infect new hosts. Leger and Duboseq consider that Chytridiopsis may be allied to the Microsporidia ; but having found no polar filament in the spore, they prefer to regard it as FIG. 179. — Spores of having affinities with Mycetozoa.* Gastrocystis gilru- The genera Amcebidium and Siedleckia were held thi. After Chatton formerly to constitute a distinct order of the Sporozoa, (819). which was named the Exosporidia. Amoebidiurn has been shown clearly by Chatton (817) to be an organism of the nature of a fungus ; while Siedleckia is now generally referred to the schizogregarines, as suggested by Minchin (589) ; see Dogiel (606). Compare also Capitlus intestinalis, Granata, parasite of the intestine of Millepedes. Affinities of the Neosporidia. — It is sufficiently apparent, from the structure and development of typical examples of any order of this subclass, that their affinities are wholly with the Sarcodina. In the case of many of the more primitive forms, it is an open question whether they should be classed in the Neosporidia or in one of the orders of the Sarcodina. Comparing them with the Telosporidia, it is seen that the two characteristics of that subclass which indi- cate affinities with the Flagellata are absent altogether in the Neosporidia — namely, the possession of flagellated swarm-spores or gametes, and the definite, gregarine-like body-form of the adults. No flagellated stages are known to occur at any period of the life- history in any member of the Neosporidia, and the body-form of the adult in this group is typically that of an amoeba. Many of the Myxosporidia might almost be regarded as parasitic amoBbae with a peculiar type of reproduction. Even more remarkable is the * It is not clear on what grounds Sohepotieff (269, p. 516) considers Chytridiopsia to be a Flagellate. THE NEOSPORIDIA 429 regularity with which the sporozoite in the Neosporidia has the form of an amoebula, as contrasted with the equally-constant gregarinula- form of the Telosporidian sporozoite. The characters implied in the terms Amcebogeniae and Rhabdogenise appear to be more diagnostic of the two groups than any other. There can be little doubt, therefore, that the union of the Telosporidia and Neosporidia in one class — the Sporozoa — is a quite artificial arrangement, and that the two subclasses in question show distinct affinities, and are descended from distinct ancestral forms — the Telosporidia from Flagellata, the Neosporidia from Sarcodina. Bibliography. — For references see p. 449. CHAPTER XVII THE INFUSORIA THE term Infusoria had originally a much wider application than at present, being used to denote the various microscopic animalcules which make their appearance in infusions exposed to the air. Hence the Infusoria included any Protozoa, and even organisms distinct from them, such as Rotifers. Just as the word " insect " has been restricted in its zoological application to a single class — the Insecta Hexapoda — so the term Infusoria has become narrowed down to denote the Infusoria Ciliata and Suctoria, which constitute, taken together, one of the most definite and sharply-marked classes of the Protozoa, characterized by two principal structural features : first, the possession of cilia during the whole or a part of their active life ; secondly, the differentiation of the nuclear apparatus into a vegeta- tive macronucleus and a generative micronucleus (p. 153). The Infusoria fall naturally into two subclasses : the Ciliata proper, in which the cilia are retained throughout life ; and the Acinetaria or Suctoria, in which cilia are present only during the early or larval phases of the life-history, and are lost in the adult organism, which is of sedentary habit, and in which food- capture is effected by special organs — suctorial tentacles. SUBCLASS I. — CILIATA. The Ciliata, the most abundant and familiar of microscopic forms of Life, may be considered in a sense the highest of the Protozoa, since in no other class does the cell-body attain to so great a com- plication of parts and organs or to so high a degree of structural differentiation. Not even in the Metazoa are single cells to be found of such visibly complicated structure, since in the Metazoa the cell is specialized usually for one particular function of a living body, while in the Ciliata the single cell performs all the functions of hfe. Moreover, the differentiation of the nuclear apparatus into generative and vegetative portions may be considered analogous with, and parallel to, the differentiation of germen and soma in the Metazoa ; and Lewin (172) regards the micronucleus as living inde- 430 THE INFUSORIA 431 • w& ' pendently during the asexual cycle, with the cell as its environment. In contrast to the extreme elaboration in the structure of the indi- vidual, the life-cycle as a whole is generally of a simple type, and the majority of the free- living species are practically monomorphic ; but some of the parasitic forms show a succession of form-changes in their life-cycle. Habits, Mode of Life. — The majority of Ciliata are free-living aquatic forms, marine or fresh-water, probably without exception holozoic in the mode of nutrition ; but a great number of parasitic forms are known. A ciliate, whatever its mode of life, may be free or sedentary. The free forms may be of swimming or creeping habit, using their cilia in the one case to move freely through the water or to glide along firm surfaces, in the other to creep over solid objects or on the surface film of the water. The sedentary forms may be attached temporarily or more or less permanently to some object, which is often the body of some larger animal. Para- sitic forms may be, as in other cases, epizoic or entozoic ; but the word " parasitic " must be taken in a wide sense, since many Ciliata living in or upon other organisms are not parasitic in the strict sense of the word, though many truly parasitic forms occur. - Body-Form. — Correlated with the diversity in the habit of life, the body-form and external structure show many variations. The primitive type of ciliate may be con- sidered to be an ovoid, gooseberry-shaped ' organism with a principal axis parallel to the direction of movement, consequently with an .— N -o. 1 Jwi Fro. 180. — Sptrostomum ambtguum, one of the largest free-living Ciliata, reaching a length of 3 millimetres, consequently a favourable object for physiological experiments. JN, Macronucleus, greatly elongated, in shape like a string of beads or sausages (so-called " moniliform " type) ; o, mouth at the hinder end of the elongated peristome ; c.i., contractile vacuole, supplied by a very long feeding-canal (f.c.) ; the micronucleus is not shown. After Stein. anterior and a posterior pole (Fig. 14, p. 32) The mouth is terminal at the anterior pole. The cilia clothe the whole body evenly, being 432 THE PROTOZOA arranged in meridional rows running from the anterior to the posterior pole, and are of equal length in all parts of the body. An ideally-simple type of this kind is very nearly realized in some of the primitive forms, but as a rule is modified in various ways. In the first place, the mouth does not remain anterior, but is shifted to the side of the body, as far as, or even farther than, half- way to the posterior pole (Fig. 181) ; consequently the rows of cilia become displaced from their primitively meridional arrange- ment, and tend to run obliquely round the body. Secondly, a differentiation is set up between the general coat of cilia clothing the body and locomotor in function, and special cilia near or around the mouth, which are usually much longer than the others, and modified in various ways in connection with the function of food- capture. The mouth itself becomes surrounded by a special area termed the " peristome," in which are found the special food-capturing cilia. In forms of creeping habit the form becomes still more modified. The body becomes flattened, and a ventral sur- face, turned towards the substratum and bearing the mouth and peristome, is distinguisKfed from the oppo- site or dorsal surface. Even more marked are the adapta- tions of the coat of cilia to this mode of life (Fig. 182). The locomotor cilia become restricted to the ventral surface, and those on the dorsal side either tend to disappear altogether or persist with a purely tactile function. The cilia of the ventral surface tend to form tufts which fuse into cirri (p. 55), with which the animal creeps as if on legs. Sedentary forms may be attached temporarily by means of special cilia or adhesive organs, or more or less permanently by a portion of the body-surface on the side opposite to the mouth. In such forms (Fig. 183) the general coating of cilia may be retained, or may disappear entirely, only the peristomial cilia persisting ; but locomotor cilia may be developed temporarily, enabling the animal to become detached from one spot, and to swim away and attach itself again elsewhere. In sedentary forms the point of attachment may be drawn out into a stalk, which may be of great length rela- tively, and may be a secreted structure or a portion of the body drawn out. In the second case the stalk may contain highly-per- ABC FIG. 181. — Diagram illustrating the shifting of the mouth, and the consequent displace- ment of the rows of cilia, in Ciliata, from a form in which the mouth is at the anterior pole and the rows of cilia run a meridional course (A), to a form in which the mouth is shifted to the side of the body (G). After Delage and Hcruuard. THE INFUSORIA 433 fected contractile mechanisms, enabling the animal to stretch out a long way from the base of attachment, or to retract itself close to it. Sedentary forms may also secrete round themselves a protec- tive sheath or tube. Structure of the Body. — The mouth, or cytostome, is an aperture leading into a longer or shorter oesophagus, or cytopharynx, which ends blindly in the endoplasm. The indigestible remains of the food are cast out through a pore in the cuticle — a cell-anus, or cytopyge, which, though a permanent structure, is usually only visible at the moment of defsecation ; but in some cases there is a distinct anal tube leading to an anal pore, visible at all tunes. In the Gymnostomata (see p. 439, infra) the mouth can be closed or opened by a system of rods contained in the wall of the oesophagus (Fig. 184), which contains no vibratile apparatus ; but in all other A B , C FIG. 182. — A and B, Euplotes patella : A, ventral view ; B, dorsal view ; 0, Euplotes harpa. In all the figures : N, macronucleua ; n, micronucleus ; c.v., contractile vacuole; crh, cirri ; p.m., peristomial membranellae ; F, area containing food- vacuoles enclosed by the maoronucleus. After Stein, the micronucleus added from original preparations. Ciliata the mouth (if present) is permanently open, and the oeso- phagus has no rod-apparatus, but contains one or more undulating membranes. In the orders Heterotricha, Hypotricha, and Peritricha (see pp. 439, 440, infra), the peristome contains a spiral zone of cilia modified in various ways, leading to the mouth, and continuous with the undulating membrane in the oesophagus. In the two first of these orders the cilia in the adoral zone are generally fused in transverse rows to form membranellse. In the Peritricha the adoral zone is composed of two parallel undulating membranes, and in this order the mouth, together with the anus and the contractile vacuoles, are sunk into a funnel-shaped or tubular depression called the " vestibule" (Fig. 183, F.) The two undulating membranes, after describing a spiral which varies from one and a quarter to five com- 28 434 THE PROTOZOA epl. FIG. 183. — Campanetta umbettaria. p.g., Peristomial groove in which runs the adorsl spiral zone of cilia, which in this species takes 41 turns ; p.r., peri- stomial ridges between the peristomial grooves ; a.sp., the two undulating membranes, each made up of three rows of cilia fused, which compose the adoral spiral, seen in optical section ; the two undulating membranes pass down into the vestibule (V.), and run down inside it spirally as far as its termination at m., which represents the true mouth, leading into the short sytopharynx or oesophagus (ess.) ; n, micronuoleus ; N, maoronucleus ; c.pl., cortical ectoplasm, thick at the base of the body, thin at the sides ; st.c., " collar " of the stalk ; at., stalk ; gr., granules in the endoplasm which stain red with neutral red in the living condition ; f.v., food-vacuoles ; c.v., contractile vaouole opening by two canals into the vestibule. After Schroder (864). THE INFUSORIA 435 N— plete turns, pass down into the vestibule, at the bottom of which is the mouth, leading into a short oesophagus (Fig. 183, ra, as.). The vestibule, into which the faeces and the excretions of the contractile vacuoles are evacuated, forms a sort of cloaca, combining, as it were, the functions of a stomodseum and a proctodaeum. The body of a ciliate Infusorian is composed of ectoplasm and endoplasm, the first of these two regions being highly differentiated and complex in structure. The surface of the entire body is clothed by a pellicle (Fig. 185, p.)— the most superficial differentiation of the ectoplasin — usually in the form of a thin, delicate membrane, which is sometimes, however, greatly thickened to form a cuirass or lorica. In addition to the mouth and anal pore already men- tioned, the pellicle is perforated by the openings of the contractile vacuoles, one or more in number. The cilia also pass through the pellicle. Beneath the pellicle the ecto- plasm, in its full development, may be differentiated into four layers, which, however, are not all of them invariably present. The most external layer of the ecto- plasm is the so-called alveolar layer (Fig. 185, al.), consisting of the outermost stratum of the alveoli of the protoplasmic framework, which take a regular arrangement, the walls between contiguous alveoli being disposed vertically to the pellicle, thus giving the appearance of a radially-striated layer. Within the alveolar layer is found commonly a protoplasmic zone containing small, spindle- shaped bodies — the so-called trichocysts (Fig. 185, tm.) — from which a long, stiff thread is discharged upon suitable stimulation. Within the trichocyst-layer comes a contractile layer, containing myonemes which run primitively beneath, or parallel to, the rows of cilia at the surface. The cilia themselves take origin from basal granules placed externally to, or between, the myonemes, and pass to the exterior between the alveoli of the alveolar layer. The most internal stratum of the ectoplasm is a spongy protoplasmic zone traversed by irregular spaces and channels containing fluid, and representing an excretory layer. The liquid from this region drains into the contractile vacuole or vacuoles. The smaller channels -cm ex. FIG. 184. — Chilodon cucullulus. o, Mouth ; ph., pharynx surrounded by a supporting apparatus of rods ; N, macronucleus ; c.v., c.v., con- tractile vacuoles ; an., anus, tem- porarily visible during the extrusion of faecal matter (ex.). After Stein. CV-, Fio. 185. — Paramecium caudatum: scmi-diagrammatio figure to show the structure. P., peristomial groove ; o, mouth ; :) formed by the union of the longi- tudinal myonemes (Schroder, 866). In Vorticetta momlata fine connections run from the hinder ciliary ring upwards and downwards to the longitudinal myonemes when the cilia are developed, but disappear when these cilia dis- appear. In Licnophora, according to Stevens, the fibril that runs under the adoral spiral is continued down to the disc or cup of attachment and ramifies in its walls. In the aberrant form Pycnothrip monocystoides, Schubotz describes a re- markable development of the myonemes in the form of a dense plexus of fibrils at the inner limit of the ectoplasm. The fibrils are connected with the basal granules of the cilia, and run in two directions, forming a deeper layer of circular myonemes and a more superficial layer of longitudinal myonemes. The question has been much discussed whether the contractile system, often so highly developed, is accompanied by any conducting elements of nervous nature. That many ciliates react with extreme rapidity to stimuli has been noted above, and that their movements are co-ordinated is suffi- ciently apparent. Neresheimer (856) describes in Stentor filaments believed to be of nervous nature, neuronemes which take origin from the foot and run about halfway up the body, at which point each neuroneme either ends in a bulbous swelling or becomes thinner and disappears. The neuronemes are situated externally to the myonemes, and run parallel to them. By experiments with various drugs, Neresheimer tried to prove the existence in Stentor of true nervous elements, as compared with Paramecium and other forms in which neuronemes were not found, and concluded that the elements described by him were truly nervous in nature. Schroder (867) casts doubt on the existence of neuronemes and criticizes Neresheimer's technique. Lebedew (93), however, describes fibrils, possibly nervous in nature, running parallel to the myonemes in Traehelocerca. For the present the existence of nervous elements in Ciliata must remain doubtful. But of the sensory function of the cilia there can be hardly any doubt, and the fact that their basal granules are always in close proximity to the myonemes is extremely significant. Such a direct contact between the sensory and contractile mechanisms may render conducting elements of nervous nature unnecessary, except for purposes of co-ordination of move- ments. In some cilia, as already stated, the motile function is lost, and only the sensory function remains. The genus Mycterothrix (Trichorhynchus) is characterized by a rostrum bearing a number of stiff, tactile cilia (Faure- Fremiet, 839). In some cases, however, sensory organs occur which appear not to be derived from cilia, as, for example, the tentacle-like or club-shaped THE INFUSORIA organs, probably tactile, between the membranellae of the adoral spiral of Tintinnidce (Schweyer). The nature and mechanism of the peculiar trichocysts remains to be ex- plained. The trichocyst in the unexploded state is a spindle-shaped body with a fine, hair-like process at its outer end which reaches to the pellicle (Fig. 186, Z>, T.). The exploded trichocyst tapers gradually to a sharp point at its proximal end ; distally it shows a cap-like swelling (Fig. 187, D — O). According to Khainsky (170-5) the trichocyst consists of two portions : a distal or outer part which stains deeply, and a proximal or inner part which stains a lighter colour (Fig. 187, A— C). The unexploded trichocyst consists entirely or almost entirely of the darker substance ; in the process of explosion the dark substance is con- verted into the light, so that in the exploded trichocyst only a small portion of the dark substance remains to form the distal cap. The notion, recently upheld by Mitrophanow (855), that the tricho- cyst consists of viscid fluid con- tained in a cavity in the ectoplasm, whence it is expelled by a sudden contraction of the ectoplasm, and stiffens to a solid thread under the action of the watery medium, cannot be maintained (Schuberg, 44) ; nor does there seem to be any ground for comparing it to a Ccelenterate nematocyst or to a polar capsule of a Cnidosporidian spore. According to Mitrophanow, the substance of the trichocysts appears first near the nucleus in the endoplasm as small grains which B io. 187. — Trichocysts of Infusoria. A — E; Syi&ges in the explosion of the tricbocysts of Paramecium caudatum, showing the manner in which the tricho- cyst grows in length, with conversion of a darkly-staining substance in to a lighter material ; the fully-exploded trichocysts ate seen in D and E. After Khainsky (170-6). F, O, Exploded trichocysts of Frontonia leucas. After Schuberg, magnified 1,500 diameters. pass out into the ectoplasm. Tricho- cysts do not occur hi any Peritricha, but in one species, Epistylis umbd- laria, large oval nematocysts occur, arranged in pairs — a phenomenon unique amongst the Ciliata. The contractile vacuoles open to the exterior as a general rule, but in the Peritricha, tf s already stated, they open into the vestibule; in this order there is usup lly a reservoir- vacuole into which one or two con- tractile vacuoles empty themselves, and which in its turn voids its contents into the vestibule. In Campandla, however, there is no reservoir- vacuole, and the single contractile vacuole opens by two canals into the vestibule (Schroder, 804). In Opcdina there are no contractile vacuoles, euid in some species (e.g., 0. ranarum) no excretory organs are to be found ; but in other species the endoplasm contains an axial series of more or less irregular vacuoles, opening one into the other and to the exterior by a pore at the posterior end of the body. These vacuoles are sometimes in close relation with the nuclei, often enveloping them to form a perinuclear space (Metcalf, 852). In Pycnothrix monocystoides the endoplasm is traversed by a branched system of excretory canals, which unite into a single efferent duct opening at the surface of the body near the posterior end by a pore ; the duct is ciliated, and is homologized by Schubotz with the cytopyge, which in Nyctotherus is 448 THE PROTOZOA also ciliated. These excretory systems of Opalina and Pycnothrix differ in being endoplasmio from the ordinary contractile vacuoles, which are always formed in the ectoplasm. The endoplasm of the Ciliata may contain enclosures of various kinds: food-vacuoles ; metaplastic bodies in the form of excretory grams, crystals, pigment-grains, etc. ; zoochlorellae, and occasionally parasites of one kind or another, etc. Special attention has been drawn by Faure-Fremiet (38'5 and 835) to the bodies termed by him spheropfasts, and considered by him to be homologous with the mitochondria (p. 41). The bodies in question are small spherules, which multiply by fission when the cell-body divides ; they are permanent cell-organs to the same extent as the nuclear apparatus, of which, however, they are entirely independent. As pointed out above, the form of the macronucleus and the number of nuclei vary greatly in different species. The cases will be considered below in which the micronucleus appears to be wanting (Opalina), or is contained in the macronucleus in the ordinary condition of the body (Trachelocerca, Ichthyophthirius). As a rule the macronucleus has a finely granular appear* ance, with the chromatin distributed evenly over the nuclear framework ; but in a few cases it has a distinctly vesicular structure, with a large karyo- some, as in Loxodes (Joseph, Kasanzeff), Chilodon (Nagler, 96), etc. The macronucleus divides by binary fission of a simple and direct type (Fig. 54} The micrpnucletfs, on the other hand, divides by mitosis (Fig. 61). In Trachelocerca, a form which may possess one or many nuclei (but no separate micronuclei), Lebedew (93) describes a peculiar mode of multiplication of the nuclei, which divide by multiple fission to form a morula-like body consisting of a mass of small nuclei which separate from one another (Fig. 66). In Loycodes, another form in which the number of nuclei varies greatly in different specimens, the macronuclei do not divide, but only the micronuclei do so, and the macronuclei arise by growth and modification of the micro- nuclei (Kasanzeff). In many cases in which the macronucleus is of the elongated moniliform type, or in which the body in the ordinary state contains two or more macronuclei, they come together to form a single compact macronucleus prior to division ; but in other similar cases this does not occur, and when the body divides the nuclei are distributed irregularly between the two daughter-individuals, as in Trachelocerca, Opalina, etc. The distributed form of nucleus is especially characteristic of the astomatous parasitic forms, and in the opinion of Pierantoni (A.P.K., xvi., p. 99) is correlated with nutri- tion by the osmotic method. The mioronucleus is less variable in form or number, as a general rule, than the maoronucleus, but is not infrequently multiple, especially when there is more than one macronucleus ; but in Trachdius ovum a single large macro- nucleus is combined with thirteen micronuclei (Hamburger, 841). The conjugation of the Ciliata conforms, as a general rule, in its main outlines to the scheme sketched out above (Fig. 77), but some important variations must be noted. In the first place, the conjugation is often pre- ceded by active division of the animals, so that the conjugants* are much smaller than the ordinary individuals of the species. When the two conju- gants come together, the micronucleus of each usually divides into four, but sometimes into eight, as in both conjugants of Euplotes and the microconju- gant of Peritricha ; in either case, however, only one micronucleus persists, and furnishes the two pronuclei. The Peritricha exhibit in their conjugation certain peculiarities which are clearly of a secondary nature and correlated with their sedentary habit. Certain individuals divide two or three times successively to produce four or eight microconjugants (" microgametes ") which acquire a ring of locomotor * It is preferable not to speak of two conjugating Infusoria as gametes, since it is very doubtful if they correspond to the gametes in the other classes of Protozoa. It is on the whole more probable that the conjugants correspond rather with gamonts or gametocyfces, which originally produced a number of gametes, reduced now to two, represented in each conjugan t by the two pronuclei. THE INFUSORIA 449 cilia and swim off. Each microconjugant attaches itself to a macroconjugant — that is to say, to an ordinary sedentary individual ; each of tu^ ^onjugants has a single micronucleus and macronucleus, but as soon as the> become associated the changes preparatory to syngamy begin. In the microcoiv igant the micronucleus divides three times to produce eight micronuclei. In Carchesium the first of these divisions is an equating division ; the second reduces the number of chromosomes from sixteen to eight ; and the third division is again an equating division (Popoff, 125). Meanwhile the macro- nucleus is in process of degeneration, and is breaking up into fragments. Of the eight micronuclei, seven degenerate, one persists and divides into two pronuclei. In the macroconjugant, meanwhile, similar events are taking place, but the micronucleus only divides twice, first by a reducing, then by an equating division, to produce four micronuclei, of which three degenerate, while the fourth persists and divides into the two pronuclei. Of the two pronuclei now present in each conjugant, one degenerates in each case ; the persistent pronucleus of the microconjugant passes over into the macroconjugant and copulates with its persistent pronucleus. The frag- ments of the maoronucleus also pass over into the macroconjugant, but are there absorbed slowly. The body of the microconjugant then falls off and dies ; only the macroconjugant is fertilized. Variations of minor importance are seen in the behaviour of the synkaryon of the exconjugant after fusion of the pronuclei ha&taken place. For example, in Paramecium bursaria the synkaryon divides to form four nuclei, two of which become macronuclei, whereupon the exconjugant divides into two ordinary individuals (Hamburger, 842) ; in Licnophora the synkaryon divides into eight, which become a micronucleus and a macronuclear chain of seven segments (Stevens, 872) ; in Carchesium the synkaryon divides also into eight to furnish a micronucleus and seven separate macronuclei, but the micro- nucleus then divides six times, with subsequent divisions of the body and sorting out of the macronuclei, until seven individuals, each with a single micronucleus and macronucleus, are produced (Popoff, 125) ; in Anoplophrya the synkaryon divides into four nuclei, two of which degenerate, the remaining two becoming a micronucleus and a macronucleus respectively. The method of nuclear reconstruction may vary even in the same species, as shown by Prandtl (126) in the case of Dtdinium. The most important deviations from the usual scheme of conjugation are seen in those forms in which there is no separate micronucleus in the ordinary condition. The cases of Opalina and Ickthyopkthirius, parasitic forms and therefore open to the charge of degeneration, are dealt with below. In Trachdocerca phcenicopterus, a free-living species, conjugation has been described by Lebedew (93) between individuals containing many nuclei all similar in appearance, each with a large karyosome. Prior to conjugation the chromatin passes out of the karyosome into the nuclear cavity of each nucleus (Fig. 188, A, B), which then divides into four. The chromatin forms a compact mass at one pole of each nucleus. During conjugation these masses of chromatin pass out of the nuclei, and lie free in the cytoplasm between them (Fig. 188, C — (?) ; each such mass is now to be regarded as a micro- nucleus and lies in a clear area, finally becoming a vesicular nucleus with a distinct alveolar structure ; the old nuclei can now be considered as macro- nuclei. All the nuclei now collect in a mass near the middle of the body. The macronuclei ultimately degenerate ; the micronuclei multiply by fission, but ultimately, according to Lebedew, they all degenerate with the exception of one in each conjugant ; the persistent micronucleus divides into two pro- nuclei which conjugate in the usual way ; unfortunately, the author's observa- tions contain so many gaps that this statement cannot be considered estab- lished so decisively as could be desired. The exconjugants contain each a single synkaryon which divides by successive divisions into a number of nuclei not differentiated into micronuclei and macronuclei. The case of Trachdocerca, as it is described, furnishes an important clue to understanding the origin of the heterokaryote condition of Infusoria from 29 450 THE PROTOZOA that found in other Protozoa. In this case, during the ordinary vegetative condition, the generative chromatin representing the micronucleus of other Infusoria, and the vegetative chromatin representing the macronucleus, aro contained in one and the same nucleus, and become separate only when syngamy is about to take place. The first sign of the separation is the forma- tion of chromidia from the karyosome within the nucleus, resulting in the formation of a secondary nucleus which becomes separate and which behaves exactly as an ordinary micronucleus ; thus indicating a clear homology between the micronuclei of Infusoria and the secondary generative nuclei of Sarcodina. The production of numerous micronuclei in the conjugation of Trachelocerca FIG. 188. — Formation of micronuclei in Trachelocerca phcenicopterus. A, B, A nucleus has divided into two, and from the karyosome (fc.)of each daughter- nucleus masses of chromatin arc being given off into the nuclear cavity ; C, D, the two nuclei of the preceding stages have divided again, to form a group of four, and the chromatin-masses (n) have acquired a compact struc- ture and are passing out of the nuclei to form the micronuolei ; in C c'rystals are seen in the cavities of the old nuclei, probably a sign of degeneration ; E, F, two groups of nuclei, both from the same specimen ; the micronuclei given off from the old nuclei become surrounded by a vacuole (n in F), and then acquire an alveolar structure (n' in E) ; 0, portion of a preparation of the body of a conjugant, the wavy contour on the right being the surface of the body which is in contact with the other conjugant ; numerous micronuclei (n) are seen, and also macronuclei, some of which still appear normal (N), others degenerating (N'). After Lebedew (93). is noteworthy, and would appear to favour the theory (see p. 154) that primi- tively numerous gametes (swarm-spores) were produced in the conjugation of Infusoria. Examples of a complicated life cycle are to be found in Ciliata chiefly, perhaps solely, among parasitic forms. As an example may be taken Jch- thyophthirius multifiliis, a parasite of the skin of various species of fresh-water fishes. In aquaria, where, owing to the limited space, the parasites, if present, find their way to the fish very easily, and where, consequently, a fish becomes infected with vast numbers of the ciliates, the parasites are usually lethal to the host, and cause its death, according to Buschkiel, in about fourteen days. In Nature, on the other hand, " ichthyophthiriasis " is seldom observed, prob- THE INFUSORIA 461 ably owing to the fact that under natural conditions only a very small propor- tion of the young parasites succeed in establishing themselves on a fish, and consequently the infections produced are so slight that they are overlooked, and the fish is unharmed. The life-cycle of IcMhyophthirius is as follows : The youngest parasites hatched out from a cyst are very small, and have a macronucleus and a micro- nucleus. They seek out a fish and bore into its epidermis, attaching them- selves by one end of the club-shaped body and rotating actively, with the result that epithelial cells are displaced, fcnd either cast off into the water or form a ring-like wall round the parasite. In this way the infusorian works its way gradually into the deeper layers of the epidermis, which closes over it, so that the parasite lies finally in a closed hollow space in the epidermis. In this position it grows in size, and at a certain point the micronucleus disappears, passing into the macronucleus to form a nucleolus-like body within it. The parasite appears to the naked eye as a little white spot on the skin, occurring on any part of the body-surface or on the gills. It retains its cilia, and can be seen rotating within the cavity in which it lies. The full-grown Ichthyophihiriua may reach 1 millimetre m diameter, but is usually less, about 0'75 millimetre. When full-grown the ciliate breaks out of the cavity in the epidermis and sinks to the bottom, attaching itself to .the ground or to water-weeds, and becomes encysted. Within the cyst it multi- plies by binary fission repeated eight times, producing 256 small ciliates ; sometimes this multiplication takes place without encystment. During this process of multiplication the micronucleus reappears, being extruded from the macronucleus of each individual when not less than four are present in the cyst ; but the exact period at which the micronuclei appear varies in different cases. In addition to the micronucleus, one or two other extrusions from the macronucleus take place (Buschkiei) ; but whether these represent other micronuclei or expelled vegetative chromatin is not clear ; in any case they degenerate and disappear. When the micronucleus makes its appearance, it divides by mitosis at each division of the cell-body, as in ordinary Ciliata, while the macronucleus divides in the usual way by direct division. When the full number of tiny ciliates is formed, each with a macro- nucleus and micronucleus, sexual phenomena occur, but the events that take place are described differently by different investigators. According to Neresheimer (858), in each individual the micronucleus divides twice, and three of the four micronuclei produced degenerate ; the fourth then divides again. The reduction-process is, therefore, according to this account, similar to that of other Ciliata, and the organism appears to be ready for con jugation, with two pronuclei ; but Neresheimer was unable to observe conjugation taking place either in the cyst or after the organisms have become free ; he observed, however, sometimes two micronuclei, sometimes one, both in free forms and in those attached to the fish, and from this it was inferred that the two pro- nuclei fuse autogamously, leaving the possibility open, however, that heter- ogamous conjugation might sometimes occur. According to Buschkiei, on the other hand, the micronucleus of each individual divides twice, and, of the four thus produced, two degenerate, and the remaining two fuse autoga- mously while still within the cyst. The little ciliates are set free from the cyst, and seek out a new host in their turn. / From the time that the full-grown parasite leaves the fish to the time that the brood is liberated from the cyst is, according to Buschkiei, about twenty hours, more or less. If an infected aquarium be kept empty of fish for sixty hours, it becomes disinfected, since the parasites all die off if they cannot attach themselves to a fish very soon after they are hatched out. The entozoic Ciliata, in which adaptation to a purely parasitic life has led to the degeneration of the apparatus of a holozoic mode of nutrition — that is to say, of the mouth, peristome, and accessory cilia — are sometimes classified as an order, Astomata, of the Holotricha ; but there can be little doubt this group, like others founded on negative characters, is a'heterogeneous collection of forma in which the characters they possess in common are due to convergent 452 THE PROTOZOA adaptation to their mode of life (c/. Leger and Duboscq, 848). The best- known genera are Anoplophrya, a typical ciliate with micronucleus and raacronucleus and with a rudimentary cytostome, constituting with Hopli- tophrya, Herpetophrya Discophrya, etc., the group Anoplophryince ; Chromidina and OpcUinopsis, parasitic in Cephalopoda, are probably allied to the fore- going (c/. Dobell, 833). The species of Opalina, constituting the group Opalinince, are parasitic in frogs and various cold-blooded vertebrates ; their nuclei vary in number in different species from two to an indefinitely large number, but are all similar and without differentiation into micronuclei and macronuclei at any period of the life-cycle. C£pede has monographed the section Anoplophryince, and has described a number of new genera and species, distributed amongst eleven families. The Astomata are internal parasites of their hosts, especially of the digestive tract. Protophrya ovicola occurs in the brood-sac of the mollusc Littorina rudis, and is parasitic upon its eggs, causing their disintegration (Kofoid). The remarkable form Pycnotkrix monocy strides, from the gut of Hyrax capensis, described by Sohubotz, deserves special mention. It reaches a length of 3 '2 millimetres, and contains parasitic nematodes. The animal itself has a great superficial resemblance to a nomatode or to a monocystid gregarihe ; it has a very thick and distinct ectoplasm, covered by an even coat of short cilia, and with two longitudinal grooves which Schubotz regards as equivalent to the peristomial grooves of other Ciliata. Each groove contains a series of pouch-like depressions, which open down into the ondoplasm, and are provided with special tracts of myonemes. Schubotz regards these pouches as a series of cytostomes, but no food-particles or vacuoles are found in the endoplasm ; the interpretation, therefore, of these openings as cytostomes can only be taken in a phylogenetic sense ; actually they appear to represent perforations of the tough ectoplasm which/may facilitate absorption of food by the osmotic method. For the cilia myonemes- and excretory system of this form see above (pp. 443, 446 447) ; the micronucleus and macronucleus are each single and of the ordinary type. Pycnothrix stands at present quite isolated. The species of the genus Opalina differ in certain peculiarities of structure and life-history from all other ciliates. The life-history of the common species of Opalina parasitic in the rectum of the frog has been studied by Metcalf (853) and Neresheimer (857), whose accounts agree as regards the general life-cycle, but differ in some cytological details. Opalina ranarum multiplies in a vegetative manner during the summer and autumn months, but in the spring a special propagative cycle occurs in relation to change of hosts and is followed by sexual processes. The vegetative reproduction increases the numbers of the parasite in the host ; it consists of two processes, multiplication of the nuclei and division of the body, which go on independently. The animal contains a great many nuclei, and when it reaches a certain size the body divides either longi- tudinally or transversely to produce two daughter-individuals, each of which grows again to the full size. The multiplication of the nuclei is effected^y a simple mitosis, similar to that of the micronucleus of other Infusoria, and without centrosomes. In the spring the parasites divide rapidly and repeatedly, without growing to full size between the divisions, so that they become continually smaller in size. A few individuals, however, do not undergo this process of rapid fission, but remain of the ordinary type, forming a stock which persists and carries on the infection in the frog, while those which divide up are destined fco pass out of it. At the beginning of the process of rapid division, the nuclei extrude chromidia, some of which are absorbed, while from the remainder secondary nuclei are formed (Neresheimer). Finally the old nuclei are absorbed. The secondary nuclei also multiply by mitosis ; and, according to Metcalf, in the later mitoses preceding encystment the number of chromo- KOtnes is reduced to one-half the ordinary number (in 0. intestinalis from eight to Jour, in O. caudata from six to three). The result of the repeated division THE INFUSORIA 453 is to produce small individuals containing, as a rule, from three to six secondary nuclei. Such individuals become encysted (infection-cysts), and pass out of the frog in the faeces. The animal at first fills the cyst completely and shows no cilia, but after a time the body shrinks within the cyst, and the animal is then seen to have a ciliary covering. The faeces of the frogs are readily devoured by tadpoles, which thus become infected with cysts. In the gut of the tadpole the Opalina emerges from its cyst, it at once divides up into uninucleate individuals, the gametes, elongated club-shaped forms with a sparse 'coat of cilia over the flattened body. Under unfavourable circumstances the gametes undergo agglomera- tion in rosettes, adhering by their pointed ends (Neresheimer). Under normal circumstances they copulate in pairs as isogametes, according to Neresheimer, in O. ranarum ; but Metcalf describes smaller uninucleate micro- gametes and larger macrogametes with one or two nuclei, in other species ; the male pronucleus then fuses with one of the two nuclei of the macrogamete. The zygote of 0. ranarum, with the two pronuclei still separate, rounds itself off and becomes encysted (copulation-cyst) ; within the cyst the two pronuclei, which have passed into a spindle-stage, undergo fusion. The zygote emerges from the cyst with a synkaryon, and it become:* an adult Opalina. Neresheimer considers that the life-cycle of Opalina proves that its affinities are with Flagellata rather than with Infusoria. In deciding this question, it must be considered, in the first place, whether in such a form the life-cycle, or the structural features of the body, are most likely to indicate affinity — that is to say, least likely to exhibit secondary peculiarities due to adaptation. Opalina is a parasitic form, and its life-cycle shows very obviously a direct daptation, of a type very common in parasitic Protozoa, to its mode of life ; multiplicative reproduction increasing its numbers within the host, and prop- agative reproduction, combined with sexual phenomena, leading to the infection of new hosts. On the other hand, its minute structure is that typical of Ciliata, a character hardly likely to be due to the influence of parasitism, as Popoff (125) has well pointed out. The chief difference between Opalina and other Ciliata, which requires special consideration, is the fact that the animal contains but one kind of nucleus. This, however, is a character known in other genera of Ciliata also--e.gr., Trachdocerca, Ichfkyophthirius. There can be but little doubt that the " heterokaryote " condition of the Infusoria, with distinct generative and vegetative nuclei, must have been derived^phylogenetieally from a condi- tion in which, as in other Protozoa, the two kinds of chromatin were contained in one and the same nucleus ; and to find this condition still retained in some Infusoria would not be remarkable. In such forms it is to be expected that prior to gamete-formation the vegetative chromatin, equivalent to the macronucleus, would be expelled, and the pronuclei would be formed from generative chromatin. There is nothing, therefore, to be said against the view of Popoff, that Opalina shows the most primitive type of gamete-formation known at present amongst the Ciliata. Its nuclei contain generative and vegetative chromatin combined, and in preparation for syngamy nuclei are formed which are purely generative, out of chromidia expelled from the primary nuclei. The forma- tion of uninucleate gametes which copulate (total karyogamy) has been re- garded by almost all those who nave theorized on the subject as being probably the most primitive type of syngamy from which the conjugation (partial karyogamy) of the Ciliata has been derived (p. 154). In Trachelocerca (p. 450) the gamont produces in a similar manner a number of generative nuclei (micronuclei) prior to the syngamic process ; but here, as in Ciliata generally, the gamont no longer divides into a number of gametes ; only one micronucleus in each gamont persists to form the two pronuclei, and the usual process of partial karyogamy takes place. These considerations indicate that the monomorphic character of the Infusoriaii life-cycle is a secondary feature ; as the structural complication of the body has increased, so the tendency to divide up into relatively minute swarm-spores has been 454 THE PROTOZOA suppressed, and has been replaced by the peculiar type of syngamy charac- teristic of the group. The cfuestion of the exact systematic position of Opylina cannot be decided until more is known of the life-cycles of other parasitic Ciliata ; but at present there do not seem to be any cogent reasons for removing this genus from the Ciliata. Affinities of the Ciliata. — A typical ciliate, such as Paramecium, with its even coat of fine cilia, its heterokaryote nuclear apparatus, and its peculiar type of syngamy with partial karyogamy, stands apart and apparently isolated from the typical members of other classes of the Protozoa. Never- theless, even within the limits of the class Ciliata, examples are to be found in which the heterokaryote condition is not developed, or only appears prior to syngamy in the form of a separation of generative from vegetative chromatin (Trachelocerca, Opalina), and in which the syngamy takes the form of total karyogamy between minute gametes, swarm-spores (Opalina)* Such cases, while they minimize the gap between Ciliata and other Protozoa, do not bring the ciliates nearer to any particular class, since a similar type of syngamy and of preparations for it may occur either in Sarcodina or Mastigophora. As the most distinctive feature of the Ciliata there remains that which is implied in the name — that is to say, the posses- sion of cilia. As has been pointed out above, how- ever, a cilium is similar to a flagellum in every essential point of structure and function. There can be no doubt that the ciliary covering represents a large number ot flagella specialized in respect to size, number, arrange- ment, and co-ordination. It has been mentioned above that some flagel- lates, such as the Tricho- nymphidce and allied forms, are regarded by some authorities as transi- tional from the FJagellatk to the Ciliata. It is per- haps improbable, how- ever, that the transition from the one group to . the other should have been through endoparasitic forms ; and it is on the whole- more likely that free- living forms, such as the holomastigote genus Multicilia, are the nearest representatives of the earlier ancestral forms of the Ciliata. Two interesting forms have been described which combine in some respects the characters of both Flagellata and Ciliata. Maupasia paradoxa (Fig. 189, B) is described by its discoverer, Schewiakoff (863), as having the body metabolic, with cilia in the anterior part of the body, and the remainder covered with long flagella. At the hinder end of the body is a longer flagellum implanted close beside the aperture of the efferent duct of the contractile vacuole. The mouth-opening, on the ventral side of e.v FIG. 189.— A, Monomastix ciliatus : fl., flagellum ; o, mouth ; N, macronucleus ; n, micronucleus ; c.v., contractile vacuole ; a., anus, near which opens the efferent canal of the contractile vacuole. After Roux, magnified 1,000. B, Maupasia paradoxa : ces., oesophagus; other letters as in A. After Schewiakoff, magnified 1,300. THE INFUSORIA 465 the body, leads into a short oesophagus. The nucleus is single, without a micronucleus. Schewiakoff makes Maupasia the type of a distinct order of the Ciliata — the Mastigotricha. Monomastix ciliatus (Fig. 189, A), described by Roux (862), and referred by him also to the Mastigotricha, has an even coat of cilia all over the body, and possesses two macrouuclei, near each of which is a micronucleus ; its most remarkable feature, is the possession of a long flagellum implanted at the anterior end of the body close to the mouth. From these various/ considerations, it seems highly probable that the Ciliata are descended from flagellate ancestors ; but it is not possible at present to indicate with any approach to exactness the line of descent. - SUBCLASS II* — ACINETABIA (Suctoria, Tentaculifera). The Acinetaria are distinguished from the Ciliata by the posses- sion of the following characters in combination : The adult organism is of sedentary habit, and has no cilia, though the youngest stage in the life-history is typically a free-swimming ciliated organism ; there is no mouth, but both the capture and ingestion of food is effected by means of special organs peculiar to this subclass, and known as tentacles. An acinetan may be attached to various objects, and is frequently epizoic. Some species attach themselves indifferently to a living or a lifeless object ; others are constantly epizoic, and occur always attached to some particular animal, frequently to a particular organ of it. Very few species, however, are truly parasitic in the adult condition ; on the other hand, many species are parasitic in the early larval stages of their life-history, and frequently so within the bodies of Ciliata (Fig. 192). The marine genus Ophryodendron, however, is a true ectoparasite, of hydroids, according to Martin, and contains nematocysts derived from its hosts. In this case the parasitism is correlated with a peculiar dimorphism of " proboscidi- form " and " vermiform " individuals, the former possessing a tuft of tentacles on a proboscis-like process, the latter being without tentacles altogether. The vermiform individuals are budded from the proboscidiform, and either form can produce ciliated buds, which develop into proboscidifonn individuals again ; but the vermiform type does not grow into the proboscidiform. In Den- drosomides paguri, however, Collin (881) finds that similar vermi- form individuals become transformed into the tentacle-bearing form. In Rhabdophrya trimorpha, ectozoic on a Gopepod (Cletodes longicaudatus), there are three forms of individuals — namely, in addition to tentaculated and vermiform specimens, peculiar " unci- form " individuals, which are also without tentacles (Chatton and Collin, 876). The form of the body varies greatly, but may be said to be typically vase-like, with or without a stalk or peduncle. In sessile forms the body is attached by a broad base to the substratum. In 466 THE PROTOZOA stalked forms the body is raised up from the point of attachment on a straight, non-contractile stalk of secreted substance; similar to that of many Vorticellids, and the animal as a whole may resemble in its general contours an Epistylis or other Vorticellid (Figs. 10, 190). Collin (877) finds that the stalk consists of a sheath, a cor- tical layer thickest at the base, and a medullary substance stratified longitudinally to the longitudinal axis. The base of the stalk rests on a cushion of secreted substance — the portion which is ^rst formed, and which is produced by a special organ of the larva comparable to the scopula (p. 441) of the Vorticellids. The body is often protected by a secreted house or theca, con- FIG. 190. — A, Podophrya mdlis ; B, Tocophrya quadripartite, two specimens attached to the stalk oi Epiatylis plicatilis ; C, Podophrya fixa, two specimens conjugating. After Saville Kent. tinuous with the stalk in the pedunculate forms. In Astrophrya arenaria the house is built up of foreign particles of various sizes (Awerinzew). As in the attached ciliates, colonies may be formed of considerable size and extent, and of various forms. The non- pedunculate genus Dendrosoma produces spreading colonies, which bear a considerable resemblance to a polyp-colony. The characteristic tentacles are stiff protoplasmic processes con- sisting of a parietal layer of ectoplasm in the form of a tube en- closing a canal containing fluid. The apex of the tentacle usually terminates in a sucker-like knob ; suctorial tentacles (" Saugten- THE INFUSORIA 467 takel ") of this type are always present. In the genus Ephdota there are present in addition prehensile tentacles (" Greiftentakel "), which end in a fine point. The exterior of the tentacle is clothed by a delicate pellicle, continuous with that of the body, and forming in the suctorial tentacles a sheath or tube, from the end of which the sucker protrudes. The tentacles are slowly retractile. When expanded they appear homogeneous ; but in the process of retrac- tion they exhibit a spiral marking, due apparently to creases and folds in the pellicle, and not to be interpreted as indicating the presence of myonemes. The tentacles are used for the capture of prey, which consists chiefly of ciliates. As soon as the sucker-like extremity of a tentacle touches a ciliate it is held fast ; the substance of the prey is then slowly absorbed by the tentacle, and passes as a stream of granules down the axis of the tentacle. During this process the ciliate re- mains alive, with cilia movin gand contractile vacuoles pulsating, until about half its substance is absorbed (Filipjev). In the genus Rhyn- cheta there is but a single tentacle of great length ; in Urnula (Fig. 191), one or two. Other genera bear usually many tentacles, which may be distributed evenly over the body- surface, or, more commonly, occur in special regions of the body or are distributed in tufts and patches. In Dendrocometes the tentacles occur in bunches borne on branches or arm-like processes of the body-wall. Ishikawa describes in the larger prehensile tentacles of Ephdota buetschliana a system of filaments, consisting of fine threads running parallel to one another in pairs and continued into the body as far as its base. The filaments stain deeply with iron-haematoxylin. According to Collin (877), each such pair of filaments is in reality the optical section of a fine tube. A suctorial tentacle, according to Collin, represents a deep invagination of the ectoplasm, opening at its innermost end into the endoplasm like the cytopharynx of a ciliate. The prehensile tentacles, on the other hand, are special formations of a different kind, simple evaginations of the body-wall, pseudopodial in nature, and containing from one to three axial filaments, the number increasing with the age of the tentacle. FIG. 191. — Urnvla epistylidis, epizoic on Dendro- soma radians. A, B, Individuals with one or two tentacles respectively ; O, formation of a bud (g) ; D, the "same seen in transverse section passing through the bud and the macronucleus of the parent ; E, free-swimming larva ; jP, en- larged view of the single tentacle, showing the spiral striation. After Hickson and Wads- worth (886). 458 THE PROTOZOA When a ciliatc — for example, a Paramecium — ia captured by the tentacle, its protoplasm streams down the tentacle to form a mass in the endoplasm of the acinetan. Before the process of suction is complete the mass breaks up into smaller masses, and these again into still smaller ones, which are carried away by the cyclosis of the endoplasm, and other masses of small size continue to be formed at the base of the tentacle. Round each of these food-masses a fluid vacuole is formed, in which the ingested protoplasm is for the most part dissolved, becoming reduced to a few granulations. The vacuole then gives off fluid and diminishes in size, and the contents are con- centrated to form a retractile body. Three kinds of such refractilt bodies are formed: so-called "colourless bodies" which stain feebly with nuclear stains, and are derived from the&protoplasm of the prey ; " tinctin-bodies," staining deeply, and originating, as described by Martin, from the chromatin of the prey ; and -others, found in some acinetans, derived from the chlorophyll of green ciliates and algal spores devoured by the animal. If a Tocophrya be starved, the ref ringent bodies are slowly absorbed, and the protoplasm becomes quite clear (Filipjev). Hence the refringent bodies that arise from the diges- tive vacuoles represent reserve-material ; there appears to be no defaecation of indigestible residues. The nature and origin of the tentacles of aoinetana hare been much dis- cussed, and some authors have sought to derive them from cirri or cilia. Schuberg (44) points out, however, that the structure of the tentacles is quite the opposite of that of the cilia ; in a cilium th$ axial portion is of firm con- sistence, the superficial layer is fluid, while in a tentacle the axis is fluid and the superficial sheath is of firm texture.' Collin (877) considers that the pre- hensile tentacles are modifications or adaptations of a pseudopodium-like process ; on the other hand, he regards the suctorial tentacles as organs of quite a different kind, more like the cytostome of a ciliate than anything else ; they may be considered each as a cytostome which has grown out from the body on a slender process or stalk (compare also Hickson, 826). In correlation with their sedentary habits, the organization of the Acinetaria is greatly simplified as compared with the Ciliata, and the remarkable structural and functional differentiation of the ectoplasm seen in the Ciliata is wanting altogether in Acinetaria, in which the ectoplasm is relatively a feebly-developed layer. Con- tractile vacuoles are usually present, one or more in number. As in Ciliata, the macronucleus exhibits a great variety of forms. One of the most remarkable is seen in the colonial form Dendrosoma, where the macronucleus is branched to the same degree as the colony, throughout which it extends continuously. The methods of reproduction are more varied, and exhibit a greater specialization, in the Acinetaria than in the Ciliata. Simple binary fission in the adult condition is rare in acinetans. Collin (881 ) , however, has observed division into two or four within a cyst in Podophrya fixa. The fission usually takes the form of bud-forma- tion. The buds may be formed either on the exterior of the body or in the interior in special brood-cavities, and they may be pro- duced in either case singly and successively or in batches or relays of several at a time. The bud is usually a simple outgrowth of the cytoplasm containing a prolongation budded off from the macro- nucleus, and one of the daughter-nuclei derived from a division of the micronucleus. At first a simple cell without structural differ- THE INFUSORIA 459 entiation, the bud is set free with a complete or partial coat of cilia as a free-swimming " embryo," " larva," " swarm-spore " (Schwarmer), or " gemmula." The larva often becomes parasitic within the body of another Infusorian (Fig. 192), multiplying there by binary fission. Finally it become^ free again, swims away, attaches itself in a suitable locality, and develops into the adult form. The ciliated larvae of acinetans exhibit various types of ciliation, commonly classed as peritrichous (Fig. 193, A, B), holotrichous (Fig. 191. E), and hypotrichous. Collin (882) has studied recently the morphology of the different types of larvae. c.e FIG. 192. — A and B, Slylonychia mytilus infested by parasitic Acinetans. N, N, Macronuclei of the Stylonychia ; P, parasitic Acinetan embryo from which arise small ciliated larvae (c.e) which swim off and develop into the adult free-living Acinetan. After Stein. The most primitive and commonest larval type of larva amongst the Acinetaria is very similar to a free-swimming stage of a Vorticellid. It has a principal axis round which the body is radially symmetrical, with an upper pole (posterior in movement) bearing a rudimentary adoral zone, and a lower (anterior) pole bearing a mass of secretion or a sucker, indicating the future point of fixation and representing the scapula of the Vorticellid ; the body is surrounded by several rings of cilia forming a zone more or less equatorial in position. Such a form, while retaining its radiate symmetry, may become either lengthened or shortened to a remarkable degree in the direction of the principal axis ; in the elongated forms the rings of cilia may increase in number until they cover the whole body, thus producing the holotrichous type. On the other hand, the body may become elongated in the morpho- logically transverse plane, and acquire a bilateral symmetry, with a dorsal surface representing the primitive upper pole and bearing the rudimentary adoral zone, and a ventral surface, with the sucker in the middle of it, repre- senting the primitive lower pole ; secondary anterior and posterior extremities are now distinguishable in relation to progression, but representing opposite 460 THE PROTOZOA points of the primitive transverse plane. In such a type the zones of cilia run obliquely along the sides of the body, or may be confined to the ventral surface, where they run a more or less elliptical course round the sucker, thus producing the hypotrichous type seen in Ephdota gemmipara and in the persistent larval form Hypocoma acinetarum. Examples of holotrichous larvae are seen in Tocophrya limbata and Urmda epistylidis (Hickson and Wadsworth, 886). In all cases the principal or dorsiventral axis of the larva becomes the principal axis of the adult ; in the process of budding, however, the principal axis of the bud arises at right angles to that of the parent, accord- ing to Collin ; Filipjev, however, does not confirm this for Tocophrya quadri- partita. The remarkable form Tachyblaston described by Martin lives in the adult condition attached to the stalk of Ephdota ; it produces buds each with a single tentacle, which creep up the stalk of the Ephdota and penetrate into the body, becoming parasitic in it and multiplying by fission to produce ciliated larvae, which in their turn swim out, attach themselves to the stalk of the Ephelota, and become adult forms. The conjugation of the Acinetaria conforms in general to the type of the process seen in Ciliata, as regards cytological details. Conjugation may take place between two individuals fixed near FIG. 193. — Free-swimming larva of DendrosoriM radians. A, Side veiw ; B, viewed from above ; C, older larva with the first rudiments of the tentacles beginning to appear. After Hickson and Wadsworth ^886). together (Fig. 190, C) ; then a lobe or outgrowth may be formed from one individual, which meets a similar outgrowth from the other, thus establishing contact. On the other hand, as in Peri- tricha, conjugation may take place between a fixed, ordinary indi- vidual and a free-swimming bud or larva liberated from another adult individual (Martin ; Co)lin, 879). In Dendrocometes the macronuclei come into contact during conjugation, but separate again (Hickson and Wadsworth). Classification. — The Acinetaria are divisible into eight families (cf. Doflein, 7). 1. Hypocomidce, for the single, somewhat aberrant genus Hypocoma, which is free-swimming, ciliated on one surface, and with a single suctorial tentacle — possibly a persistent larval form (see Collin, 877). 2. Urnulidce. — With or without a house, with one or few tentacles. Rhyn- cheta, Urmda (Fig. 191). 3. Metacinetidce. — With a stalked house opening at the upper end for the exit of the tentacles. Metacineta. THE INFUSORIA 461 4. Podophryidce. — Stalked or sessile, with no house and with numerous tentacles. Sphoerophrya, Podophrya (Fig. 190), Ephdota. 5. Acinetidce. — Stalked or sessile, with a house of simple form and wide aperture, and with numerous tentacles, all knobbed. Tocophrya (Fig. 190), Acineta (Fig. 10). 6. Dendrosomidae (Trichophryidae). — Sessile, without a house; tentacles knobbed, arranged in tufts or branches. Trichophrya, Dendrosoma, Lernceo- phrya (Perez), Rhabdophrya (Chatton and Collin), Astrophrya (Awerinzew). 7. Dendrocometidce. — Flat forms with numerous branched arms on the ends of which the suckers occur. Dendrocometes. 8. Ophryodendridoe. — Marine stalked forms with numerous short tentacles concentrated on proboscis-like processes. Vermiform individuals also occur (p. 455). Ophryodendron. Affinities of the Acinetaria. — The presence of cilia in the young stages, the possession of distinct vegetative macronuclei and generative micronuclei, and the process of conjugation, similar in all essential details to that of the Ciliata, can leave no doubt as to the position of the Acinetaria in the class Infusoria, and their affinities with the Ciliata. Collin, in a series of interesting studies, has drawn attention to many points indicating a close relationship between Acinetaria and Vorticellids, more especially the structural homologies between the larvae of the one and the free-swimming stages of the other group ; for example, the peritrichous arrangement of the cilia, the rudimentary adoral zone at the posterior pole, and the fixation by means of a scopula-like organ at the anterior pole, points especially well seen in the larva of Tocophyra cydopum. Bibliography. — For references see p. 502. CHAPTER XVIII AFFINITIES AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE MAIN SUBDIVISIONS— DOUBTFUL GROUPS IN the foregoing chapters the Protozoa have been dealt with systematically, grouped in a somewhat conservative manner under the four old-established and generally-recognized classes. At the same time it has been pointed out that one class at least — namely, the exclusively-parasitic Sporozoa — comprises two subclasses which are quite distinct from one another, and are descended, in all probability, from ancestors differing t greatly in characters and affinities. And in the case of the three remaining classes, con- sisting mainly of free-living, non-parasitic forms, two whifch exhibit more primitive characters — namely, the Sarcodina and Mastigophora — are connected with one another by transitional forms which render the distinction between them very arbitrary (p. 213) ; while the third, the highly-specialized Infusoria, are linked closely by structural characters and by transitional forms to the Mastigophora. Many authorities on the Protozoa have put forward schemes of classification which are intended to express the affinities and inter- relationships of the chief groups in a clearer and more satisfactory manner than the fourfold classification generally recognized. The systems proposed have taken the form either of subdividing the Protozoa into more than four classes or of uniting the recognized subdivisions into a smaller number of categories. Rollcst on and Jackson (16) divide the Protozoa as a whole into three groups : (1) the Rhizopoda ( =Sarcodina) ; (2) the Endoparasita (=Sporozoa); and (3) the Plegepoda, " referring to their mode of progression by means of a rapidly - repeated stroke (77X77777) of vibratile processes," to comprise the Mastigophora and Infusoria. Doflein (891) recognizes two principal stems in the Protozoan phylum: (1) the Plasmodroma, to include the Sarcodina, Mastigophora, and Sporozoa, organisms that make use of locomotor organs which represent true pseudo- podia, or their derivatives or modifications ; and (2) the Ciliophora, comprising the Ciliata and Suctoria, in which the locomotor organellae are cilia. The obvious criticism of this scheme is that, whatever opinion may be held as to the desirability of drawing a line between the Infusoria, so highly specialized in many respects, and other Protozoa, the distinctive character chosen is not a happy one, since whatever may be predicated of flagella as derivatives of pseu- dopodia applies, apparently, with equal force to cilia. 462 CLASSIFICATION OF THE MAIN SUBDIVISIONS 463 Hartmann (892) recognizes six classes of the Protozoa : Class I., the Sarco- dina, including four subclasses — namely, Rhizopoda, Heliozoa, Radiolaria, and Mycetozoa ; Class II., the Cnidosporidia, including Microsporidia, Sarco- sporidia, Myxosporidia, and Actinomyxidia ; Class III., the Mastigophora, including the Rhizomastigina, Protomonadina, Binucleata, Chromomonadina, Euglenoidca, and Phytomonadina, the order Binucleata including the Haemo- flagellates and the Hsemosporidia with the exception of the hsemogregarines ; Class IV., the Telosporidia. including the grogarines, coccidia, and haemo- gregarines ; Class V., the Trichonymphida ; Class VI., the Infusoria. With regard to this classification, the order Binucleata has been dealt with at length above ; it only remains to say that the isolated position given to the Trichonymphida appears to express the defective state of knowledge con- cerning the affinities of these peculiar parasites, rather than their true taxo- nomic importance. A number of radical changes in the classification of the Protozoa are pro- posed by Awerinzew (890). With Hartmann he unites the Hsemoflagellatcs and Hsemosporidia in an order Binucleata to be placed in tho Flagellata.. The class Sporozoa is to be entirely abolished. Tho order Amoebina (Amcebaea) is removed by him entirely from the Sarcodina, which will then comprise only the Foraminifera and some Heliozoa. The Amoebina are to be put with the Flagellata as the Amceboflagellata, a group from which all other Protozoa are supposed to have arisen, and from which the Amoebina branch off in one direction, the Flagellata and Dinofiagehata in another. The gre- garines are believed by Awerinzew to bo connected on tho one side with the Amoebina, on the other with the Coccidia. In the Neosporidia, the Sarco- sporidia are regarded as allied to Flagellata ; the Myxospondia, Microsporidia, and Actinomyxidia, are considered not to be Protozoa at all ; the. Haplo- sporidia are to be placed provisionally as an independent group taking origin from Amoebina. For the Infusoria, it is suggested that they take origin from amceboflagellate ancestors rather than from true Flagellata. The object of what is termed a natural as opposed to an artificial system of classification is to endeavour to express by the arrange- ment of the groups the affinities of the living organisms concerned, and more especially the genetic relationships of one to another on the theory of evolution— that is to say, on the assumption or belief that forms now existing are descended from older ancestral forms, and that any two existing forms are descended from a common ancestral form more or less remote, according as the two existing forms in question have diverged more or less widely from one another. The foundation of a natural classification is therefore the phytogeny of the groups dealt with — that is to say, their pedigrees and lines of descent, so far as they can be traced. Phylogeny must, however, always be a matter of speculation, and to a large extent of personal opinion, rather than of direct observation. It is only possible to infer from the study of existing species what the ancestral forms may have been like, since it is unnecessary to point out that no form can be the ancestor of another species existing at the same time. The most that can be said of two co-existing species is that one of them may be believed to have diverged much less in its characters from the common ancestral form than the other. When, therefore, a given form is said to have an amoebic or a cer- comonad ancestry, it is not intended to imply by that statement 464 THE PROTOZOA that the ancestor was Amoeba proteus or Cercomonas crassicauda, but only that it was a form such that, if it existed at the present day, it would be referred by its characters to the genus Amoeba or Cercomonas, as the case might be. The data for drawing phylogenetic conclusions in Protozoa con- sist entirely of comparisons between the structure and life-history of the various existing forms. Palaeontology gives no assistance, since only skeletons are preserved as fossils. All that can be learned from the geological record is that the differentiation of the main groups must have taken place at an immeasurably remote period of the earth's history, since skeletons of Foraminifera and Radiolaria — groups of which the structure and life-history indicate a long pedigree — are found in the earliest fossiliferous strata. It is little wonder, therefore, that the phylogeny of the Protozoa is a subject on which the most opposite opinions are held, as is apparent from the classificatory systems cited above. There can be no finality in a phylogenetic theory, nor, consequently, in any scheme of classification put forward. Both the one and the other express merely the state of current knowledge, and may be expected to undergo modification as knowledge advances. It is impossible to discuss here at length the phylogeny and classification of the Protozoa, and only a few guiding principles can be put forward. From a general survey of the phylum, it may be claimed first of all that the Protozoa constitute a compact group with definite characters, not a mere receptacle into which can be put anything and everything of microscopic dimensions which is not a bacterium, a fungus, or a parasitic worm, as some writers seem to think. Common to all Protozoa in at least the principal stages of the life-cycle is the differentiation of the body into distinct nucleus and cytoplasm — that is to say, the possession of that type of organization to which I have proposed to restrict the application of the term cell. Doubtless there are, or have been, transitions from this type to the simpler grade of organization characteristic of the bacteria and allied organisms, but such transitions must be sought for outside the phylum Protozoa. The essential unity and homogeneity underlying the innumerable differentiations of form and structure in the Protozoa may be taken to mean that the phylum as a whole is descended from a common ancestral form, and the first problem is, then, to attempt to form some notion of what the ancestor was like. In dealing with the more specialized forms, such as those constituting the Infusoria or the two principal subdivisions of the Sporozoa, it has been pointed out that each group appears to be derived either from flagellate or sarcodine ancestors. In reviewing the Mastigophora and Sarcodina, it was further pointed out that, greatly as the typical representa- CLASSIFICATION OF THE MAIN SUBDIVISIONS 465 tives of the two classes may differ, there are forms of which the systematic position is quite arbitrary. In such a form as Pseudo- spora, it becomes almost purely a matter of opinion or taste which phase of the life-cycle is to be regarded as the " adult " form determining the class in which the genus is to be placed. Thus, all paths of evolution in Protozoa appear to lead back- wards to one or the other of the two forms that occur so frequently in the actual development as the earliest phases — the amcebula and the flagellula. Most of those who have speculated on the phylogeny of the Protozoa have, consequently regarded the an- cestral form of the phylum as one combining amoeboid and flagellate characters. Biitschli (2) considered that the Rhizomastigina re- present more nearly than any other existing group the primitive type of Protozoon. Since then, however, the life-cycle of the mastigamcebae has been studied, and it is seen that the adult amoeboid form is preceded in development by a simpler monad form (p. 266, Fig. 112), which makes it very doubtful if the mastig- amoeba itself can be taken as a primitive type. Awerinzew (890) also regards an " amoe bo flagellate " type as the primitive stock of Protozoa, which gave rise to all existing groups, and became differentiated into the Amcebina on the one hand, the Flagellata on the other. If an organism possesses two kinds of locomotor organs — pseudo- podia and flagella — it is reasonable to suppose that a still more primitive and ancestral form would have possessed only one of these two kinds of organs. It has been seen that there is a gradual transition from pseudopodia to flagella, the intermediate type of organ being a pseudopodium (axopodium) with a firm, rigid, or elastic secreted axis. The question then arises, Which end of the series is to be put first, the flagellum or the pseudopodium ? Inas- much as flagella are found commonly in bacteria, it might be argued that they represent the most primitive type of locomotor organella, and that a simple flagellate monad would represent most nearly the ancestral type of organization in Protozoa. Then it must be sup- posed that the formation of pseudopodia is a secondary character, acquired by the ancestral form, and the pseudopodia themselves would represent either simple outgrowths of the naked body (lobo- podia) or modifications of flagella (axo podia). Having regard, however, to the manner in which flagella them- selves arise — as simple outgrowths from the body — and to the fact that their structure and mode of action are apparently of a much more specialized type than those of pseudopodia, the conclusion seems irresistible that pseudopodia preceded flagella in evolution. We may, then, regard as the most ancestral type in the Protozoa a minute amcebula-form, in structure a true cell, with nucleus and 30 466 THE PROTOZOA cytoplasm distinct, which moved by means of pseudopodia ; but it must be supposed that some of the pseudopodia very soon under- went modifications which resulted in the acquisition of true flagella, and thus arose at a very early stage of evolution the flagellula or monad-form. In all probability these earliest monads were forms with an amoeboid body, most nearly represented at the present day by such forms as Cercomonas (Fig. 114) or the flagellulae of Mycetozoa (Fig. 98). From such forms arose the Sarcodina and their derivatives (Neosporidia) by loss of flagella and specialization of the amoeboid form in the adult, and the Mastigophora and their derivatives (Telosporidia, Infusoria) by specialization of the flagellar apparatus combined with the acquisition of a cortex and loss of amoeboid movement. If the foregoing phylogenetic speculations be accepted, it is clear that in a natural classification of the Protozoa the Sporozoa must be abolished as a class, and the two groups comprised in them must either be raised to the rank of independent classes or dis- tributed amongst the others — the Telosporidia placed near the Mastigophora, the Neosporidia near the Sarcodina. The primary subdivision of the Protozoa, if it is to represent the first branching of the ancestral stem, should be one which places on one side the Mastigophora, Telosporidia (better Rhabdogeniae), and Infusoria, oil the other the Sarcodina and Neosporidia (better Amoebogonise). Beyond this point it is scarcely profitaole at the present time to push phylogenetio speculations farther. In conclusion, two groups of organisms require brief mention — the Spirochaetes and the Chlamydozoa — since by many authorities they have been referred to a position in or near the Protozoa. THE SPIROCH^TES. Under the name " Spirochaetes " are grouped a number of or- ganisms, free-living or parasitic, with flexible bodies of slender, thread-like form, concerning the nature and systematic position of which a great deal of confusion has existed of recent years, due chiefly to conflicting statements with regard to the facts of their structure and methods of reproduction. The group comprises five principal types, regarded each as of generic rank : 1. Spirochceta sens, strict., a name given by Ehrenberg in 1833 to a relatively large, free-living form, 8. plicatilis. Other species of the genus have been described. For a full account, see Zuelzer (904). 2. Cristispira, a name proposed by Gross (897) for a number of species parasitic in the digestive tract or crystalline style of Lamelli- branch molluscs, and characterized- by the possession-^f a crest or CLASSIFICATION OF THE MAIN SUBDIVISIONS 467 ridge, commonly but wrongly termed an " undulating membrane," running the length of the body. The type of the genus is C. bal- bianii, originally named by Certes Trypanosoma balbianii, from the crystalline style of the oyster. 3. Saprospira, Gross (898), for free-living, saprophytic forms similar in structure to Cristispira, but without the crest. 4. Spiroschaudinnia, the name proposed by Sambon for the many species of minute spirochaetes parasitic in the blood of verte- brates and in various invertebrates. Such are S. recurrentis (=obermeieri), parasite of human relapsing fever; S. duttoni^ parasite of African relapsing fever; S. gallinarum of fowls; S. anserina of geese ; and numerous other species from various hosts. In structure the body of these species appears to be little, if any- thing, more than a flexible thread of chromatin ; but the develop- ment indicates rather that, as in the genus Cristispira, the interior of the body is divided into minute segments or chambers. The species parasitic in blood are transmitted by the agency of blood-sucking arthropods. S. duttoni, for example, is transmitted by a tick — Ornithodoros moubata — which lives in the mud-floors of huts or in the soil in spots where caravans camp habitually. The spirochaetes are taken up from human blood by the adult ticks, and pass through the egg into the next generation of nymphs,* which transmit the infection to human beings. 5. Treponema, the name proposed by Schaudinn for T. pallidum, the spirochaete of syphilis discovered by him. A second species— T. penenue, the parasite of yaws (framboesia) — is also recognized. Structurally this type is very similar to the last. Some authors — for instance, Gross (899) and Dobell (895) — consider that there is " no valid reason for drawing a generic distinction between Treponema pallidum and such forms as ' Spirochcefa ' recurrentis, etc.'* Gross combines Types 4 and 5 under the name Spironema proposed by Vuillemin ; but since this name is preoccupied, Dobell places them together in Schaudinn's genus Treponema. The forms parasitic in the blood of human beings and other vertebrates were generally regarded as Bacteria of the genus Spirillum, or at least of the* section Spirillacea, until quite recent years, and the diseases caused by them were spoken of as spirilloses. The chief points of difference between the spirilla of relapsing fevers and those of the ordinary type were the flexibility of the body in the former and the failure to grow them in cultures. The con- fusion prevailing at present originated with Schaudinn's famous memoir on the blood-parasites of the Little Owl (132). While, on the one hand, it is to Schaudinn's credit to have recognized the affinities of the parasitic " spirilla " to Ehrenberg's free-living genus Spirochceta he was, on the other hand, misled by the superficial resemblance between spirochsetes and certain small, slender forms of trypanosomes, which again he connected, quite erroneously, with the life-cycle of Leucocylozoon (see p. 370). Schaudinn therefore regarded the spirbchaetes as Protozoa allied to trypanosomes, and endeavoured to prove a similar type of organization in both classes of organisms : a nuclear * The six-legged larval stage is suppressed — that is to say, passed through in the egg — in this species of tick. 468 THE PROTOZOA apparatus with kinetonucleus and trophonucleus, and a locomotor apparatus with flagellum and undulating membrane. Schaudinn further constructed a hypothetical form of " Urhaemoflagellat " connecting the spirochaeto and trypanosome type of organization ; he put forward the suggestion (903) that " as the general structural plan of a trypanosome (nuclear and locomotor apparatus) may be found realized in various groups of Protozoa as a transitory developmental condition (comparable somewhat to the gastrula -condition in the Metazoa), so also the spirochaete may crop up occasionally as a morpho- logical type in the development of Protozoa, and as a developmental stage may indicate to us phylogenetic relations." Schaudinn lived long enough, fortunately, to retract many of his state ments with regard to the structure of spirochaetes, and acknowledged that the trypanosome -type of structure was not to be made out in the minute parasitic 8pirochaetesN Nevertheless, since his time the investigators of these organisms have been divided into two camps — those who hold fast to Schaudinn's theory of the spirochaetes as Protozoa, and those who class them with Bacteria, respectively ; it being generally assumed, for some unknown reason, that it they are not Protozoa they must be Bacteria, or vice versa. A third set of authorities compromise by placing the spirochaetes in an intermediate position between the two groups. In considering the question of the affinities of the spirochaetes, attention has been directed not only to their structure, but also to their life -history ; and a hot controversy has raged with regard to their mode of fission, whether it takes place longitudinally, as in a trypanosome, or transversely, as in a bacterium. Investigators contradict each other flatly with regard to this point ; but from the most recent investigations it seems probable, at least, that the division is always transverse, and that the appearance of longitudinal division is due to the peculiar method of " incurvation " described by Gross (Fig. 194). A spirochaete about to divide grows greatly in length, and one end of the body doubles back on itself, continuing to do so until the recurved limb of the body is of the same length as the remainder ; the two halves twist round each other and produce an appearance which may be mistaken easily for longitudinal fission ; but the actual division of the body takes place at the point where it is bent over, and is transverse. With regard to the development, nothing has been found in the least con- firmatory of Schaudinn's statements with regard to " Spirochceta ziemanni," with the sole exception of the statements of Krzysztalowicz and Siedlecki (901), who profess to have seen trypanosome-stagesin the development of Treponema pattidum ; but their statements are entirely unconfirmed by other investi- gators. Of a very opposite type are the statements of Leishman (902) with regard to the development of 8. duttoni in the tick. The spirochaete appears to break up into minute masses of chromatin, " coccoid granules," in the ova and tissue-cells of the tick. The coccoid granules appear to develop into spirochaetes again. The observations of Leishman have recently been fully confirmed by the in- vestigations on the development of Spiroschaudinnia gattinarum published by Hindle ( 900) who gives a useful diagram of the entire life-history. Bosanquet (894) also observed the formation of coccoid bodies in Cristispira anodontce by the segmentation of the elongated body into a number of ceccoid bodies like a string of beads. A development of this type suggests very strongly affinities with bacteria, but none whatever with Protozoa of any class. The coccoid grains may be compared with the spore -formation in bacteria, and with that described by Gross (898) in Saprospira grandis. In all cases, through- out the series of living beings, wherever an organism exhibits in its fully- developed " adult " stage peculiarities of a special kind, it is above all to the early developmental forms that the naturalist turns for indications of the true affinities of the organism in question. Recently the structure of spirochaetes has been studied carefully by Gross (897, 898), Zuelzer (904), and Dobell (895), by means of proper cytological methods of technique. The results show a complete difference in every CLASSIFICATION OF THE MAIN SUBDIVISIONS 469 respect between spirochsetes and trypanosomes and other flagellates. In the •words of Dobell, " the nuclear and cytoplasmic structures are wholly different ; a trypanosome has a flagellum, a spirochaete has none ; the crista is not an undulating membrane ; the cell-membranes are not similar ; and, moreover, the method of division is quite different in the two organisms." Doflein (7) places the spiroohaetes as a group named the Pro- flagellata, supposed to be transitional from bacteria to flagellates. Zuelzer (904) takes a similar view, rejecting, however, any affinity between spirochaetes and Hartmann's " Binucleata." Awerinzew (890) puts forward the remarkable suggestion that the Flagellata " pass on into different Binucleata, and end with the Spirochceta Fid. 194. — Stages in the division of Cristispira pcctinis. A, B, Two successive stages of the incurvation ; C, incurvation complete ; Df division of the body at the point where it is bent back ; E, F, separation of the two daughter- spiroohajtes. After Gross (897). (sic)" from which it would appear that he regards the spirochaetes as the last product of the line of evolution that produced the trypanosomes and allied forms. For the various reasons that have been set forth above, it appears impossible to include the spirochaetes any longer in the Protozoa. Dobell regards them as "an independent group of unicellular organisms which show very little affinity to any other group.''5 Gross, on the other hand, considers that the Spironemacea — i.e., the genera Cristispira, Saprospira, and Spironema, in the sense in which this genus is understood by him (see above) — form a family which can be ranked in the bacteria, but which is related to the Cyanophycese, especially the Oscillatoriae. 470 THE PROTOZOA THE CHLAMYDOZOA. The name Chlamydozoa of Prowazek (Strongyloplasmata, Lip- schiitz) was proposed in order to include in the first place a class of highly problematic organisms believed to be the causes of certain diseases of man or animals. It is not yet certain exactly what diseases are to be referred to Chlamydozoa. According to Hart- mann (909), undoubted chlamydozoal diseases are vaccinia and variola, trachoma, and molluscum contagiosum, amongst human beings, and in birds epithelioma contagiosum and diphtheria. Further diseases probably attributable to Chlamydozoa are hydro- phobia, scarlet fever, measles, foot-and-mouth disease of animals, and " Gelbsucht " of silkworms. In all these diseases the virus has certain common properties, while exhibiting specific peculiarities in each case. It can pass through ordinary bacterial filters without losing its virulence, and it produces characteristic reaction-proxiucts or cell-inclusions in the infected cell. In order to understand why these organisms should be men- tioned in a book dealing with Protozoa, the subject is best dealt with in an historical manner. The advances in the knowledge of the diseases mentioned may be summarized briefly in four principal stages : 1. Various investigators at different times have made known the existence of peculiar cell-inclusions in the infected cells in a certain class of diseases, inclusions which have been known by the names of their discoverers — for instance, in trachoma (Prowazek's bodies), vaccinia (Guarnieri's bodies), scarlet fever (Mallory's bodies), hydrophobia (Negri's bodies), etc. 2. By many investigators the characteristic cell-inclusions were identified as the actual parasitic organisms causing the disease. They received zoological names, were referred to a definite position in the ranks of the Protozoa, and attempts were made to work out and construct a developmental cycle for them. The supposed parasites of molluscum contagiosum were referred to the coccidia ; those of vaccinia and variola were given the name Cytoryctea ; of hydrophobia, Neuroryctes ; of scarlet fever, Cyclasterium. Calkins (908) studied in great detail the cell-inclusions of vaccine and smallpox, and described a complete developmental cycle, in its main outlines as follows : The primary infection is brought about, probably, at some spot on the mucous membrane of the respiratory or buccal passages by air- borne germs (spores). After active pro- liferation at the seat of the primary infection, the parasites are carried to all parts of the body in the circulation, probably during the initial fever. These two early phases are hypothetical. The third phase is the appearance of the parasites in the cells of the CLASSIFICATION OF THE MAIN SUBDIVISIONS 471 stratified epithelium of the epidermis. In this situation they run through two cycles — the one cytoplasmic, the other intranuclear. The first is the vaccine-cycle, and is the only part of the develop- ment of which the harmless vaccine-organism is capable ; the variola-organism, however, after passing through, a vaccine-cycle, proceeds to the extremely pathogenic intranuclear cycle. The vaccine-cycle, according to Calkins, begins with the appear- ance of " gemmules " in the cytoplasm of the cells affected. Each gemmule is a minute grain of chromatin without cytoplasm of its own at first, but as it grows a cytoplasmic body is formed. When full-grown, the parasite sporulates by fragmentation of its nucleus into a great number of grains, which, as gemmules, pass into other cells and repeat the development already described. Several generations of this type may succeed each other before giving rise to the next type. The intranuclear variola-cycle begins in the same way with gemmules, which, however, penetrate into the nucleus, and develop a cytoplasmic body. According to Calkins, they become sexually differentiated, and produce gametes which conjugate. The final result is the production of numerous spores, which are probably the means of spreading the infection. Calkins referred Cytoryctes to the Microsporidia. Now, however, he inclines to the opinion that the genus should be placed amongst the Rhizopods (4). Negri (910) also describes a developmental cycle for Neuroryctes hydrophobia, which he regards as a true Protozoon, and which Calkins refers also to the Rhizopoda. Siegel (914) describes under the name Cytorhyctes organisms of a type perfectly different from those described by Calkins. He distinguishes four species — Cyto- rhyctes vaccinice of vaccine and smallpox, C. luis of syphilis, C. scarla- tince of scarlet fever, and C. aphtharum of foot-and-mouth disease. 3. The parasitic life-cycles described by Calkins and others have been criticized by a number of investigators, .who have maintained that the bodies in question are not Protozoa, nor even independent living organisms at all, but merely degeneration-products of the cell itself, provoked by a virus yet to be found. Thus, with regard to Guarnieri's bodies (Cytoryctes) of vaccine, it is maintained by Foa, Prowazek, and others, that they consist of nucleolar substance (plastin) extruded from the nucleus ; that they have no definite developmental cycle ; and that infection can be produced by lymph in which Guarnieri's bodies have been destroyed, or by tissue in which they are not present. With regard to the Negri bodies, Acton and Harvey (906) come to the same conclusions, and state that similar nucleolar extrusions can be brought about also by other stimuli than the rabies-virus. 472 THE PROTOZOA 4. The foregoing sceptical phase has been succeeded by the positive belief that the true parasitic organism in these diseases consists of certain minute bodies — the Chlamydozoa or strongyloplasms.* The chief characteristics of the Chlamydozoa, according to Prowazek and Lipschiitz (913) are, first, their minute size, smaller than any bacteria hitherto known, enabling them to pass the ordinary bacterial filters ; secondly, that they develop within cells, in the cytoplasm or nucleus, and produce characteristic reaction- products and enclosures of the cell (their position within the cell is not the result of phagocytosis) ; thirdly, that they pass through a series of developmental stages, and are specially characterized by their mode of division, which is not a simple process of splitting, as in bacteria, but is effected with formation of a dumb-bell-shaped figure, as in tbe division of a centriole. Two dots are seen con- nected by a fine line like a centre desmose, which becomes drawn out until it snaps across the middle, and its two halves are then re- tracted into the body. Chlamydozoa have not yet been grown successfully in cultures, but infections can be produced with pure colloid-filtrates, free from bacteria, but containing the minute bodies themselves. They are characteristically parasites of epi- blastic cells and tissues. As an example of the development of a chlamydozoon may be taken that of the vaccine- virus, which, according to Prowazek (913) and Hartmann (909), is briefly as follows : 1. The infection begins and ends with numerous " elementary corpuscles " (gemmules of Calkins ?), which occur both within and amongst the cells . They are very minute, and can pass bacterial filters . 2. Within the cells the elementary corpuscles grow into the larger " initial bodies." ' 3. The infected cell extrudes nucleolar substance — plastin — from its nucleus, which envelops the parasites as in a mantle (hence the name Chlamydozoa, from xAa/avs, a mantle), thus producing in the case of vaccine the characteristic Guarnieri's bodies, in which the paiasites multiply. It is this mantle of nucleolar substance, apparently, which represents the " cytoplasm " of Cytoryctes, as described by Calkins. * The name Chlamydozoa, as denoting a class of microscopic organisms, must on no account be confused with the names Cyioryctes, Neuroryctea, etc., which represent the generic names of the supposed parasites of variola and rabies re- spectively. To those who regard Cytoryctes, etc., as true organisms, the Chlamydo- zoa are merely chromidia or dots of chromatin in the body of the parasite ; to those who believe in the Chlamydozoa as complete organisms, Cytoryctes, etc., are cell-inclusions or degeneration-products of the nucleus. The conceptions implied in the words Chlamydozoa and Cytoryctes respectively are antagonistic and mutually destructive ; if the one is a reality, the other is non-existent. It is altogether incorrect to speak of Cytoryctes, Neuroryctes, etc., as genera of Chlamy- dozoa. 4. Finally, the Guarnieri's body breaks up, and the cell becomes full of initial corpuscles, which divide up in their turn into numerous elementary corpuscles, and the cycle is complete. An interesting problem, from both the medical and biological points of view, is that of the relation of the organism of vaccinia (cow-pox) to that of variola (small-pox). It is well known that an inoculation with vaccine-lymph (vaccination) produces a transitory local disturbance which confers partial immunity against infection with variola. It does not seem to be quite clear whether the organisms, of vaccinia and variola are to be regarded as two distinct species or as two phases or conditions of the same species of or- ganism ; the latter is the view of Calkins, as stated above. Manson has suggested (Brit. Med. Journ., 1905, ii., p. 1263) that the relationship between the organisms of vaccinia And variola may be similar to that, between Leishmania iropica, of Oriental Sore, and L. donovani, of Kala-azar. No evidence has been brought forward as yet, however, to show that an infection with Oriental Sore confers any immunity against Kala-azar. The Chlamydozoa have been most studied in those cases where their power of producing disease has forced them upon the atten- tion of medical investigators, but it is not to be supposed that as a group of organisms they occur solely as parasites of higher animals. It is probable that they are of widespread occurrence, and that the peculiar nuclear parasite of Amoeba known as Nucleophaga, Dan- geard, for instance, should be referred to the Chlamydozoa (com- pare Schepotieff, 269), and perhaps also the similar parasite of Paramecium described by Calkins under the name Caryoryctes. No Chlamydozoa are known, however, to occur as free-living, non- parasitic organisms, but this circumstance may be due to theii extreme minuteness ; the species "mown owe their detection to the disturbances they cause in their hosts. Finally, it must be men- tioned that the parasitic theory of cancer, sometimes thought to be long since defunct, has been revived recently by Awerinzew (907), who is of opinion that cancer is caused by intranuclear parasites of the nature of Chlamydozoa. Such, briefly summarized, is the present position of the problem. Future research must decide the truth or falsity of one or the other of the solutions that have been advocated. It only remains to discuss briefly the nature of the Chlamydozoa, if the interpreta- tion of Prowazek and his adherents be accepted. According to Prowazek and Lipschiitz (913), the Chlamydozoa belong neither to the Bacteria nor to the Protozoa. Hartmann (909), however, seems to consider that their development and their characteristic mode of division are Protozoan characteristics. The " development," how- ever, seems to consist of little, if anything, more than growth in size As "elementary corpuscles" they are smaller, as "initial bodies" larger. The dumb-bell-shaped figure seen in division may mean 474 THE PROTOZOA simply that their substance is of a viscid or semifluid nature, and that their bodies are aot limited by a membrane ; consequently, when the two halves travel apart in the process of division, the substance of the body is drawn out into a connecting thread until its surface tension overcomes its cohesion. On the other hand, they exhibit nothing of cell- structure or of any other characteristics which indicate any affinity to the Protozoa. Their type of organiza- tion seems to be the simplest possible in a living body — a mere grain of chromatin without cytoplasm, and without a membrane or envelope of any kind. In the latter respect they appear to be of a simpler type of organization than any bacterium, and perhaps represent more nearly than any other known organism the simplest possible form of living being. Bibliography. — For references see p. 504 lie domum, saturce, venit Hesperus, ite capettaz. BIBLIOGRAPHY The references to literature are numbered consecutively, but are grouped according to the chapters. An asterisk (*) attached to a reference' indicates that the work in question contains full references to the previous literature of the subject. Memoirs in which only new species are described are not cited, unless there is some special reason for doing so. All new species are recorded in the " Zoological Itecotd," published annually by the Zoological Society of London ; the. last volume published up to date is that for 1910 / the volume for 1911 Witt appear towards the end of 1912. The titles of the subject-matter of articles are in many cases not given verbatim, but in abbreviated form. The abbreviations employed for the titles of periodicals are given below. (In other cases the titles of periodicals are abbreviated in a manner which does not require special explanation.) A.I.C.P. Archives do Institute Bacteriologioo Camara Pestana (Lisbon). A.I.P. Annales de 1'Institut Pasteur (Paris). A.K.d A. Arbeiten aus clem kaiserlichen Gosundheitsamte (Berlin). A.P.K. Archiv f iir Protistenkunde (Jena). A.S.T.H. Archiv f iir Schiffs- und Tropenhygiene (Leipzig). A.T.M.P. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology (Liverpool). A.Z.E. Archives de Zoologie experiinentale et generate (Paris). B.A.S.C. Bulletin Internationale de 1' Academic des Sciences a Cracovie. B.B. Biological Bulletin (Woods Holl, Mass.). B.C. Biologisches Centralblatt (Leipzig). B.I.P. Bulletin de 1'Institut Pasteur (Paris). B.S.P.E. — de la Soci6t6 de Pathologic Exotique (Paris). B.S.Z.F. — de la Societe" Zoologique de France (Paris). C.B.B.P.K. Centralblatt fiir Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde und Infections- krankheiten (Jena). C.R.A.S, Comptes-rendus hebdomadaires des Seances de 1'Academie des Sciences (Paris). C.R.S.B. des Seances et Memoires de la Societe de Biologie (Paris). J.E.M. Journal of Experimental Medicine (Baltimore). J.E.Z, — of Experimental Zoology (Baltimore). J.H. — of Hygiene (Cambridge). J.L.S. — of the Linnean Society : Zoology (London). M.I.O.C. Memorias do Institute Oswaldo Cruz (Rio de Janeiro). P.R.S. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Py. Parasitology (Cambridge). P.Z.S. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. Q.J.M.S. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science (London). S.B.A.B. Sitzungsberichte der koniglich-preussischen Akademie der Wissen- schaftcn zu Berlin. S.B.G.B. — der Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin. S.B.G.M.P. — der Gesellschaft fiir Morphologic und Physiologic in Miinchen. S.M.I. Scientific Memoirs by Officers of the Medical and Sanitary Depart- ments of the Government of India (Calcutta). V.D.Z.G. Verhandlungen der deutsohen zoologischen Gesellschaft (Leipzig). Z.A. Zoologischer Anzeiger (Leipzig). Z.a.-P. Zeitschrift fiir allgemeine Physiologic (Jena). Z.H. — fiir Hygiene und Infectionskrankheiten (Leipzig). Z.w.Z. — fiir wissenschaftliche Zoologie (Leipzig). 475 476 THE PROTOZOA CHAPTER I General Works on Protozoa. (1) BRUMPT, E. (1910). Precis de Parasitologie. Paris : Masson et Cie. *(2) BiJTSCHU, O. (1882-1889). Protozoa. Bronn'a Klassen und Ordnungen die Thier-Reichs, I. (3) — (1910). Vbrlesungen iiber vergleichende Anatomic, 1. Leipzig: W. Engelmann. (4) CALKINS, G. N. (1901). The Protozoa. New York : Macmillan and Co. *(5) — (1909). Protozoology. New York and Philadelphia : Lea and Fiebiger. *(6) DELAQE, Y., and HEROTJARD, E. (1896). Traite de Zoologie Concrete, I. Paris : Schleicher Freres. *(7) DOFLEIN, F. (1911). Lehrbuch der Protozoenkunde. Third edition. Jena: Gustav Fischer. (8) HARTOQ, M. (1906). Protozoa. Cambridge Natural History, vol. i. London: Macmillan and Co. (9) KENT, W. S. (1880-1882). A Manual of the Infusoria. London : David Bogue. *(10) LANG, A. (1901). Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Anatomic der wirbellosen Thiere, 2te Auflage. Jena : Gustav Fischer. (11) LANKESTER, E. R. (1891) Protozoa. Encyclopedia Britannica, ninth edition ; reprinted in Zoological Articles. London : A. and C. Black. (12) — (1903 and 1909). A Treatise on Zoology. Part I., Fascs. 1 and 2. London : A. and C. Black. (13) MINCHIN, E. A. (1907). Protozoa. Allbutt and Rolleston : A System of Medicine, vol. ii., part ii., p. 9. (14) PROWAZEK S. V., and others (1911). Handbuch der Pathogenen Protozoen. Leipzig : J. A. Barth. Lief. 1 and 2. (15) ROLLESTON, G., and JACKSON, W. H. (1888). Forms of Animal Life. Second edition. Oxford : Clarendon Press. CHAPTER II In addition to the general works cited under the previous chapter, see especially : (16) GOODEY, T. (1911). A Contribution to our Knowledge of the Protozoa of the Soil. P.R.S. (B.), Ixxxiv., p. 165. (17) LATJTERBORN, R. (1901), Die " sapropelische " Lebewelt. Z.A., xxiv., p. 50. (18) LAVERAN, A., and MESNIL, F. (1899). De la Sarcocystine, toxine des Sarco- sporidies. C.E.8.B., Ii., p. 311. (19) — and PETTIT, A. (1911). Les trypanotoxines. B.S.P.E. iv. p. 42. (20) MESNIL, F. (1905). L'H6r6dite dans les Maladies a Protozoaires. B.I. P., iii., p. 401. (21) MINCHIN, E. A. (1910). Phenomena of Parasitism amongst Protozoa. Journ. Quekett Microscop. Club (2), xi., p. 1. (22) ROUDSKY, D. (1910). Le Trypanosoma lewisi Kent renforce. C.R.8.B., Ixix., p. 384. (23) — (1911). La possibility de rendre le Trypanosoma lewisi virulent pour d autres rongeurs que le rat. G.R.A.S., clii., p. 56. (See also Bulletin of the Sleeping Sickness Bureau, vol. iii., pp. 81 and 265 for further references on this subject.) (24) RUSSELL, E. J., and HUTCHINSON, H. B. (1909). The Effect of Partial Sterilization of Soil on the Production of Plant Food. Journ. Agric. Sci., iii., p. 111. (25) TEICHMANN, E. (1910). Das Gift der Sarcosporidien. A.P.K., xx., p. 97. (26) — andBRATTN, H. (1911). Ein Protozoentoxin (Sarcosporidiotoxin). A.P.K., xxii., p. 351. (27) WENDELSTADT and FELLMER, T. (1910). Einwirkung von Kaltbluterpas- sagen auf Nagana- und Lewisi-Trypanosomen. Zeitschr. f. Immunitdts- forschung, v., p. 337. (28) WINTER, F. W. (1907). Untersuchung iiber Peneroplis pertusus (Forskal). A.P.K., x., p. 1. BIBLIOGRAPHY 477 CHAPTER HI In addition to the general works cited under Chapter I., see especially : (29) HERON-ALLEN, E., and EARLAND, A. (1909). A New Species of Technitetta. Journ. Quekett Microsc. Club (2), x., p. 403. (30) KOLTZOFF, N. K. (1903). Formbestimmende elastische Gebilde in Zellen. B.C., xxiii., p. 680. (31) _ (1906). Die Gestalt der Zelle. Arch. mikr. Anat., Ixvii., p. 364. (32) PROWAZEK, S. v. (1908). Biologie der Zellen, I. B.C., xxviii., p. 782. (33) — (1909). Theorie der Cytomorphe. Z.A., xxxiv., p. 712. (34) RHTIMBLER, L. (1898). Physikalische Analyse von Lebenserscheinungen der Zelle, I. Arch. EntwicHungsmech., vii., p. 103. (35) — (1902). Die Doppelschalen von Orbitolites. A.P.K., i., p. 193. (36) VERWOHN, M. (1888). Biologische Protisten-Studien. Z.w.Z., xlvi., p. 455. CHAPTER IV In addition to Nos. 34 and 35, see : *(37) BtiTSCHLi, 0. (1894). Microscopic Foams and Protoplasm. (Translation by E. A. Minchin.) London : A. and C. Black. (38) FATJRE'-FREMIET, E. (1908). La Structure des Matieres Vivantes. B.8.Z.F., xxxiii., p. 104. *(38'5) — (1910). Lea Mitochondries des Protozoaires et des Cellules sexuelles. Arch, d' 'Anat. Microsc., xi., p. 457. *(39) FISCHER, A. (1899). Fixirung, Farbung und Bau des Protoplasmas. Jena : Gustav Fischer. (40) RHTIMBLER, L. (1902). Der Aggregatzustand und die physikalischen Beson- derheiten des lebenden ZeUinhalts. Z.a.P., ii., p. 183. CHAPTER V In addition to the references cited above for Chapters I. and III., and those cited below for Chapter X., see : (41) GOLDSCHMIDT, R. (1907). Lebensgeschichte der Mastigamoben. A.P.K., Suppl. I., p. 83. (42) MINCHIN, E. A, and WOODCOCK, H. M. (1911). The Trypanosome of the Little Owl (Athene noctua). Q.J.M.S., Ivii., p. 141. (43) SCHAUDINN, F. (1894). Camptonema nutans. S.B.A.B., lii., p. 1227. Re- printed, Schaudinn's Arbeiten, 1911, p. 50. (44) SCHUBERG, A. (1905). Cilien und Trichocysten einiger Infusorien. A.P.K., vL, p. 61. CHAPTER VI In addition to the works cited here, see also the bibliographical references for Chapter VII. (45) ARAGAO, H. DE B. (1910). Ueber Polytometta agilis. M.I.O.C., ii., p. 42. (46) AWERINZEW, S. (1907). Struktur des Protoplasms und des Kerns von Amoeba jtroteus (Pall.). Z.A., xxxii., p. 45. (47) — (1909). Entwicklungsgeschichte von Coccidien aus dem Darme von Cerebratvlua sp. (Barrouxia spiralis). A.P.K., xviii., p. 11. (48) CALKINS, G. N. (1903). The Protozoan Nucleus. A.P.K., ii., p. 213. (48'5) CHAGAS, C. (1911). Die zyklischen Variationen des Caryosoms bei zwei Arten parasitischer Ciliaten. M.I.O.C., iii., p. 136. *(49) CHATTON, E. (1910). La structure du Noyau et la Mitose chez les Amcebiens. A.Z.E. (5), v., p. 267. (50) COLLIN, B. (190U). La Conjugaison d'Anoplophrya branchiarum (Stein) (A. circvlans, Balbiani). A.Z.E. (5), i., p. 345. *(51) DOBELL, C. C. (1909). Chromidia and the Binuclearity Hypothesis Q.J.M.S., liii., p. 279. 478 THE PROTOZOA *(62) DOBELL, C. C. (1911). Contributions to the Cytology of the Bacteria. Q.J.M.S., Ivi., p. 395. " Autorreferat " ia A.P.K., xxiv., p. 84. (53) ENTZ, G. (1909). Organisation und Biologic der Tintinniden. A.P.K., xv., p. 93. (54) ERHARD, H. (1911). Die Henneguy-Lenhosseksche Theorie. Ergebn. Anat. Entwick., xix. (second half), p. 893. (55) FATTRE-FREMIET, E. (1910). Appareil nucleaire, Chromidies, Mitochondries. A.P.K., xxi., p. 186. (56) FEAK^A, C., and ATHIAS, M. (1907).' Les Trypanosomes des Amphibiens, II. Le Trypanosoma rotatorium de Hylu arborea. A.I.G.P., i., p. 289. (57) GOLDSCHMIDT, R. (1904). Die Chromidien der Protozoen. A.P.K., v.,p- 126. (58). — and POPOFF, M. (1907). Die Karyokinese der Protozoen und der Cnromi- dialapparat der Protozoen- und Metazoenzelle. A.P.K., viii., p. 321. (59) GUILLERMOND, A. (1910). Corpuscules metaohromatiques ou Grains de Volu- tine. A.P.K., xix., p. 289. (60) HARTMANN, M. (1909). Pplyenergide Kerne. B.C., xxix., pp. 481 and 491. (61) — (1911). Die Konstitution der Protistenkerne. Jena : Gustav Fischer. (62) — and CHAOAS, C. (1910). Flagellatenstudien. M.I.O.C., iL, p. 64. (63) — and PROWAZEK, S. v. (1907). Blepharoplast, Caryosom und Centrosom. A.P.K., x., p. 306. (64) HEBTWIO, R. (1898). Kerntheilung, Richtungskorperbildung und Befruch- tung von Adinosphterium Eichhorni. Abhandl. buyer. Akad. (II. Cl.) xix., p. 631. (66) — (1899). Encystierung und Kernvermehrung bei Arcella vulgaris. Kup- ffer's Festschrift, p. 567. (66) — (1902). Die Protozoen und die Zelltheorie. A.P.K., i., p. 1. (67) — (1903). Das Wechselverhaltnis von Kern und Protoplasma. 8.B.Q.M.P., xviii. p ;77. (68) — (1907). Der Chromidialapparat und der Dualismus der Kemsubstanzen. Ibid., xxiii., p. 19. (69) JAHN, E. (1904). Kernteilung und Geisselbildung bei den Schwarmern von Stemdnitis flaccida. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges., xxii., p. 84. (70) JANICKI, C. (1910). Parasitisohe Flagellaten, I. Lophomonas blattarum, L. striata. Z.w.Z., xcv., p. 243. (71) — (1911). Der Parabasalapparat bei parasitischen Flagellaten. B.C., xxxi., p. 321. (71*5) — (1912). Parasitische Arten der Gattung Paramceba. Verh. Natur- forach. Ges. Basel, xxiii. (72) LEGER, L., and DUBOSCQ, 0. (1911). Deux Gregarines des Crustacea. A.Z.E. (5), vi., ''Notes et Revue," p. lix. (73) MAIEE, H. N. (1903). Der feinere Bau der Wimperapparate der Infusorien. A.P.K., ii., p. 73. (74) MESNIL, F. (1905). Chromidies et Questions connexes. B.I.P., iii., p. 313. (75) MINCHIN, E. A. (1911). Some Problems of Evolution in the Simplest Forms of Life. Journ. Quekett Micrpsc. Club (2), xi., p. 166. (76) NAGLEK, K. (1911). Protozoen aus einem Almtiimpel, I. Amoeba hartmanni, n. sp. Anhang : Zur Centriolfrage. A.P.K., xxii, p. 56* 77) POPOFF, M. (1909). Die Zellgrosse, ihre Fixierung und Vererbung. Arch. Zellforschung, iii., p. 124. (78) REICHENOW, E. (1910). Hcemogregariw stepar*>wi. Die Entwicklungsge- schichte einer Hamogregarine. A.P.K., xx., p. 251. (79) ROBERTSON, M. (1911). The Division of the Collar-Cell* of the Calcarea Heteroccda. Q.J.M.S., Ivii., p. 129. (80) — and MINCHIN, E. A. (1910). The Division of the Collar-Cells of Clathrina coriacea. Q.J.M.S., lv., p. 611. (81 ) SCHAUUINN, F. (1896). Der ZeUgungskreis von Paramoeba eilhardi. S.B.A.B., p. 31. Reprinted, Schaudinn's Arbeiten, 1911, p. 115. (82) — (1896). Das Centralkorn der Heliozoen. V.D.Z.O., vi., p. 113. (With discussion by Lauterborn and Biitschli.) (83) SIEDLECKJ, M. (1905). Die Bedeutung des Karyosoms. B.A.S.C.,.p. 559. (84) WENYON, C. M. (1911). Oriental Sore in Baghdad, together with Observa- tions on a Gregarine in Stegomyia fasciata, the H»mogregarines of Dogs, and the Flagellates of House Flies. Py., iv., p. 273. (86) ZUELZER, M. (1904). Difflugia urceolata. A.P.K., iv., p. 240. (86) — (1909). Wagneretta borealis. A.P.K., xvii., p. 135. BIBLIOGRAPHY 479 In addition to the works cited here, see also Nos. 45, 48, 49, 50, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64» 66, 69, 70, 71, 71'5, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, and 86 above. (87) ARAQAO, H. DB B. (1904). Amoeba diplomitotica. M.I.O.G., L, p. 33. (88) AWERINZEW, S. (1904). Teilung von Amoeba proteus. Z.A., xxvii., p. 399. (89) HARTMANN, M., and CHAGAS, C. (1910). Schlangenhamogregarinen. A.P.K., xx., p. 351. (90) (1910). Die Kernteilung von Amoeba hyalina. M.I.O.C., ii., p. 159. (91) HERTWIG, R. (1903). Korrelation von Zell- und Kerngrosse. B.C., xxiii., pp. 49 and 108. (92) — (1908). Neue Probleme der Zellenlehre. Arch. f. Zellforschung, i., p. 1. (93) LEBEDEW, W. (1908). Trachdocerca phoenicopterus. A.P.K. xiii., p. 70. (94) MOROFF, T. (1908). Die bei den Cephalopoden vorkommenden Aggregata- Arten. A.P.K., xi., p. 1. (95) NAGLER, K. (1909). Entwicklungsgeschichtliohe Studien iiber Amoben. A.P.K., xv., p. 1. (96) — (1911). Caryosom und Centriol beim Teilungayorgang von Chilodon uncinatus. A.P.K. , xxiv., p. 142. (97) PROWAZEK, S. v. (1903). Die Kernteilung des Entosiphon. A.P.K., ii., p. 325. (97'5) REICHENOW, E. (1909). Hcematococcus pluvialis. A.K.O.A., xxxiii., p. 1. (98) SCHAUDINN, F. (1894). Kerntheilung mit nachfolgender Korpertheilung bei Amoeba crystattigera. S.B.A.B., 1894, p. 1029. Reprinted, Schaudinn's Arbeiten, 1911, p. 95. (99) — (1900). Der Generationswechsel bei Coccidien. Zool. JahrbiicKer (Abth. f. Anat.), xiii., p. 197. Schaudinn's Ar'eiten, 1911, p. 208. (100) SCHEWIAKOFF, W. (1887). Die karyokinetische Kerntheilung der Euglypha alveolata. Morph, Jahrbuch, xiii., p. 193 (101) SWAROZEWSKY, B. (1908). Die Fortpftahzungserscheinungen bei Arcella vulgans. A.P.K., xii., p. 173. CHAPTER VIII In addition to the works cited here, see also Nos. 41, 47, 50, 51, 57, 64, 67, 68, 74, 75, 81, 85, 92, 93, 99, and-101. (102) BAITSELL, 6. A. (1911). Conjugation of Closely Related Individuals of Stylonychia. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. Med., viii., p. 122. (103) BOTT, M. (1907). Fortpflanzung von Pdomyxa. A.P.K., viii., p. 120, (104) CALKINS G. N. (1904). Studies on the Life-History of Protozoa, IV. J.E.Z,, i., p. 423. (105) — (1906). The Protozoan Life-Cycle. B.B., xi., p. 229. (106) — and CULL, S. W. (1907). The Conjugation of Paramecium aurelia (caudatum). A.P.K., x., p. 375. (107) DANGBARD, P. A. (1911). La Conjugaison des Infusoires cilies. C.B.A.S., clii., p. 1032. (108) — (1911). La Feoondation des Infusoires cilies. C.R.A.8., clii., p. 1703. (109) DEHORNS, A. (1911). Permutation nucleaire dans la Conjugaison de Col- pidium cdpoda. C.R.A.S., clii., p. 1354. (110> DOBELL, C. C. (1911). The Principles of Protistology. A.P.K., xxiii.. p. 269. (111) DOFLBIN, F. (1907). Die Konjugation der Infusorien. 8.B.O.M.P., xxiii., p. 107. (112) ENSIQUES, P. (1907). La Coiiitrgazione e il Differenziamento sessuale negli Infusori. A.P.K., ix., p. 195. ~> (113) — (1908). Die Conjugation und-eexuelle Difterenzierung der Infusorien. A.P.K., xii., p. 213. (114) GEDDES. P., and THOMSON J. A. (1901). The Evolution of Sex. Revised edition. London. (115) HAMBURGER, C. (1908). Die Conjugation von Stenter cfervlcus. Z.w.Z., xc., p. 423. (116) HARTMANN, M. (1909). Autogamie bei Protisten. A.P.K., »v., p. 264. 480 THE PROTOZOA (117) HARTOG, M. U910). Apropos of Dr. Hartmann's " Autogamie bei Prolo- zoen." A.P.K., xviii., p. 111. (118) HEKTWIG, R. (1902). Wesen und Bedeutung der Befruchtung. Silzber. k. Akad. Wiss. Munchen., xxxii., p. 57. (119) — (1905). Das Problem der sexuellen Differenzierung. V.D.Z.G., 1905, p. 186. (120) HIOKSON, S. J. (1910). The Origin of Sex. Ann. Hep. Trans. Manchester Microsc. Soc., 1909, p. 34. (121) JENNINGS, H. S. (1910). What Conditions induce Conjugation in Para- mecium ? J.E.Z., ix., p. 279. (122) MATJPAS, E. (1889). Le Rajeunissemont karyogamique chez les Cili6s. A.Z.E., (2) vii., p. 149. (123) MTJLSOW, K. (1911). Fortpflanzungsersciieinungen bei Monocystis roatrato. A.P.K., xxii., p. 20. (124) PEAKL, R. (1907). A Biometrical Study of Conjugation in Paramecium. Biometrika, v., p. 213. (125) POPOFF, M. (1908). Die Gametenbildung und die Conjugation von Car- chesium polypinum. Z.w.Z., Ixxxix., p. 478. (126) PRANDTL, H. (1906). Die Konjugation von Didinium nasutum. A.P.K., vii., p. 229. (127) PKOWAZEK, S. v. (1905). Der Erreger der Kohlhernie, Plasmodiophora brassicce. A.K.G.A., xxii., p. 396. (128) (1907). Die Sexualitat bei den Protisten. A.P.K., ix., p. 22. (129) SCHAUDINN, F. (1896). Copulation von Actinophrys. 8.B.A.B., p. 83. (130) — (1902). Krankheitserregende Protozoen, II. Plasmodium vivax. A.K.G.A., xix., p. 169. (131) — (1903). Die Fortpflanzung einiger Rhizopoden. A.K.G.A., xix., p. 547. (132) — (1904). Generations- und Wirtswechsel bei Trypanosoma und Spiro- chcete. A.K.G.A., xx., p. 387. Reprinted, with " Nachtrag," in Fritz Schaudinn's Arbeiten, 1911. (133) — (1905). Die Befruchtung bei Protozoen. V.D.Z.G., xv., p. 16. (134) SCHILLING, C. (1910). Autogamie bei Trypanosoma lewisi. A.P.K., xix., p. 119. (135) STEMPELL, W. (1906). Die neuere Protozoenforschung und die Zellenlehre. 8. B. Med.-naturwiss. Ges. Miinster i. W., June 13. (136) STEVENS, N. M. (1910). The Chromosomes and Conjugation in Boveria aubcylindrica, var. concharum. A.P.K., xx., p. 126. (137) VERSLUYS, J. (1906). Die Konjugation der Infusorien. B.C., xxvi., p. 46. (138) WOODRUFF, L. L. (1905). Life-History of Hypotrichous Infusoria. J.E.Z., ii., p. 585. (139) — (1908). Life-Cycle of Paramecium. Amer. Nat., xlii., p. 520. (140) — (1909). Further Studies on the Life-Cycle of Paramecium. B.B., xvii., p. 287. (141) — (1911). Two Thousand Generations of Paramecium. A.P.K., xxi., p. 263. (142) — (1911). The Adaptation of Paramcecia to Different Environments. B.B., xxii., p. 60. (143) — and BAITSELL, G. A. (1911). Rhythms in the Reproductive Activity of Infusoria. J.E.Z., xi., p. 339. CHAPTER IX In addition to the works cited here, see also Nos. 41, 65, 78, 85, 86, 99, 101, 130, and 131. (144) ELPATTEWSKY, W. (1907). Fortpflanzung von Arcetta vulgaris. A.P.K., x., p. 441. (145) KHAINSKY, A. (1910). Tiber Arcellen. A.P.K., xxi., p. 165. (146) SCHATTDINN, F. (1899). Der Generationswechsel von Trichosphcerium sidtoldi. Anhang. Abhandl. Preuss. Akad. Wins. (147) _ (1902). Cydospora caryolyttca. A.K.G.A., xviii., p. 378. Reprint in Fritz Sohaudinn's Afbeiten, 1911, p. 318. BIBLIOGRAPHY 481 CHAPTER X In addition to the works cited below, see also 34, 35, 36, 37 40, and 237. (148) BARRATT, J. O. W. (1905). Die Kohlensaureproduktiou von Paramecium aurelia. Z.a.P., v., p. 66. (149) — (1905). Der Einfluss der Konzentration auf die Chemotaxis. Z.a.P., v., p. 73. (150) BASS, C. C. (1911). A New Conception of Immunity : its Application to the cultivation of Protozoa and Bacteria. Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc., Ivii., p. 1534. (151) BOISSEVAIN, M. (1908). Kernverhaltnisse von Actinosphcerium eichhorni bei fortgesetzter Kultur. A.P.K., xiii., p. 167. (152) BORGERT, A. (1909). Erscheinungen fettiger Degeneration bei tripyleen Radiolarien. A.P.K., xvi., p. 1. (152*5) BOVABD, J. F. (1907). Structure and Movements of Condylostoma patens. Univ. California Publ., iii., p. 343. (153) BtiTSCHLi, 0. (1906). Zur Kenntnis dea Paramylons. A.P.K., vii., p. 197. (154) DKGEN, A. (1905). Die kontraktile Vacuole und die Wabenstruktur dea Protoplasmas. Bot. Zeitung, Ixiii., p. 163. (155) DOBELL, C. C. (1907). Physiological Degeneration in Opalina. Q.J.M.S., li., p. 633., (156) ERDMANN, R. (1910). Depression und facultative Apogamie bei Amoeba diploidea. Hertwig's Festschrift, i., p. 323. (157) GARBOWSKI, L. (1907). Gestaltsveranderung und Plasmoptyse. A.P.K., ix., p. 63. (158) GIEMSA, G. (1911). FixierungundFarbungderProtozoen. Vide Prowazek (14), p. 7. (159) — and PROWAZEK, S. v. (1908). Wirkungdes Chinins auf die Protistenzelle. A.S.T.H., xii., Beiheft 5, p. 188. (160) GREELEY, A. W. (1902). Artificial Production of Spores in Monas by a Reduction of the Temperature. Univ. Chicago Decennial Publ., x., p. 73. (161) GREENWOOD, M. (1886-1887). Digestive Processes of some Rhizopods, I. Journ. Physiol., vii., p. 253. II., ibid., viii., p. 263. (162) — (1894). Constitution and Formation of " Food-Vacuolea " in Infusoria, etc. Phil. Trans. (B), clxxxv., p. 356. (163) — and SATTNDERS, E. R. (1894). The Role of Acid in Protozoan Digestion. Journ. Physiol., xvi., p. 441. (164) HERTWIG, R. (1904). Pbysiologische Degeneration bei Actinosphcerium eichhorni. Haeckel'e Festschrift (Jena, G. Fischer), p. 301. *(165) JENNINGS, H. S. (1904). The Behaviour of the Lower Organisms. Washington : Carnegie Institute. (166) — (1904). The Behaviour of Paramecium. Journ. Comp. Neurology, xiv., p. 441 ; Contr. Zod. Lab. University of Philadelphia, xi., 1905. (167) — (1904). The External Discharge of the Contractile Vacuole. Z.A., xxvii., p. 656. (168) — (1904). Physical Imitations of the Activities of A mceba. Amer. Natural , xxxviii., p. 625. (169) JOSEPH, H., and PROWAZEK, S. v. (1902). Die Einwirkung von Rontgen- Strahlen auf einige Organismen. Z.a.P., i., p. 142. (170) KANITZ, A. (1907). Der Einfluss der Temperatur auf pulsierenden Vakuolen der Infusorien. B.C., xxvii., p. 11. (170-5) KHAINSKY, A. (1910). Morphologic und Physiologic einiger Infusorien (Paramecium caudatum). A.P.K., xxi., p. 1. (171) LEWIN, K. R. (1910). Nuclear Relations of Paramecium caudatum during the Asexual Period. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., xvi., p. 39. (172) — (1911). Behaviour of the Infusorian Micronucleus in Regeneration. P.R.S., Ixxxiv., p. 332. (173) LIFSKA, I. (1910). L'Innuence de 1'Inanition chez Paramecium caudatum. Rev. Suisse Zod., xviii., p. 591. (174) MACKINNON, D. (1908). Encystation of Actinosphcerium eichhorni under Different Temperatures. Q.J.M.S., Iii., p. 407. (175) McLENDON, J. F. (1909). Protozoan Studies. J.E.Z., vi., p. 265. (176) MAST, S. 0. (1910). Reactions of Amoaba to Light. J.E.Z., ix. p. 265. 31 482 THE PROTOZOA (177) MESNIL, F., and MOUTON, H. (1903). Une Diastase Proteolytique Extraito des Infusoires Oilids. C.S.8.B., lv., p. 1016. (178) (1903). L' Action Antiproteolytique Comparee des Diverses Scrums sur I'Amibodiastase eto. C.R.S.B., lv., p. 1018. (179) METALNIKOFF, S. (1903). Die intracellulare Verdauung. Bull. Ac. St. Petersbourg, xix., p. 187. (180) METBCHNIKOFF, E. (1889). La Digestion Intracellulaire. A.I. P., iii., p. 26. (181) NIBEKSTEIN, E. (1905). Ernahrungsphysiologie dor Protisten. Z.a.P., v., p. 434. (182) — (1910). Fettverdauung und Fettspeioherung bei Infusorien. Z.a.P., x., p. 137. (183) NOWIKOFF, M. (1908). Die Wirkung des Schilddriisenextrakts auf Ciliaten. A.P.K., xi., p. 309. (184) POPOFF, M. (1907). Depression der Protozoenzelle und der Geschlechtszcllen der Metazoen. A.P.K., Suppl., i., p. 43, (185) — (1909). Der Einfluss ohemischer Beagentien auf der Funktionszustand der Zelle. S.B.G.M.P., xxv., p. 55. (186) — (1909). Einige Ursachen der physiologisohen Depressi6n der Zelle. Arch. Zettforschung, iv., p. 1. (187) PBANDTL, H. (1907). Die physiologische Degeneration der Amoeba proteus. A.P.K., viii., p. 281. (188) PBOWAZEK, S. v. (1903). Studien zur Biologie der Zelle. Z.a.P., ii., p. 385. (189) — (1903). Regeneration und Biologie der Protpzoen. A.P.K., iii., p. 44. (190) — (1903). Degenerative Hyperregeneration bei den Protozoen. A.P.K., iii., p. 60. (191) — (1908). Das Lecithin. B.C., xxviii., p. 382. (192) — (1908). Einflusa von Saurelosimgen niedrigster Konzentration auf die Zell- und Kernteilung. Arch. Entwicklungsmech., xxv., p. 643. (193) — (1909). Biologie der Zellen. II. Zelltod und Strukturspannung. B.C., xxix., p. 291. (194) — (1910). Die Physiologic der Eiuzelligen. Leipzig : Teubner. (195) — (1910). Giftwirkung und Protozoenplasma. A.P.K., xviii., p. 221. (196) — (1910). Biologie der Protozoen, V. A.P.K., xx., p. 201. (197) PUTTER, A. (1900). Thigmotaxis bei Protiaten. Arch. Anal. Physiol., Physid. Abt., Suppl. Band, p. 243. (198) — (1903). Die Wirkung erhohter Sauerstoffspannung auf die lebendige Substanz. Z.a.P., iii., p. 363. (199) — (1903). Reizbeantwortung der oiliaten Infusorien. Z.a.P., iv., p. 406. (200) — (1905). Leuohtende Organismen. Z.a.P., v., Referate, p. 17. (201) — (1905). Die Atmung der Protozoen. Z.a.P., v., p. 566. (202) — (1908). Vergleiohende Physiologic des Stoffwechselfl. Abh. k. Ges. Wise. OdUingen (n.F.), vi., p. 1. *(202) — (1908). Erforschung des Lebens der Protisten. Tigerstedt, Handbuch der physidogischen Methodik. (203) RHUMBLEE, L. (1905). Die Oberflachenkrafte der Amoben. Z.to.Z., Ixxxiii., p. 1. (204) — (1910). Die verschiedenen Nahrungaaufnahmen bei Amoben als Folge verschiedener Colloidalzustande ihrcr Oberflachen. Arch. Entwicklunga- mech., xxx., p. 194. (205) ROESLE, E. (1902). Die Reaction einiger Infusorien auf einzelne Induk- tionsschlage. Z.a.P., iL,-p. 139. (206) SCHEWIAKOFF, W. (1893). Die Natur der sogennanten Excretkorner der Infusorien. Z.w.Z., Ivii., p. 32. (207) SMITH, G. (1903). Actinosphcerium eichhorni : A Biometrical Study inJJie Mass Relations of Nucleus and Cytoplasm. Biometrika, ii., p. 241. (208) STAJJIEWICZ, W. (1910). La Digestion de la Graisse dana les Infusoires Cilies. B.A.8.C., p. 199. (209) STATKEWITSCH, P. (1905). Galvanotropismus und Galvanotaxis der Gliata. Z.a.P., v., p. 511. (210) — (1904). Zur Methodik der biologischen Untersuchungen iiber die Pro- tisten. A.P.K., v., p. 17. (211) VEBWOEN, M. (1904). Die Localisation der Atmung in der Zelle. Dtnkschr. Oes. Jena, xi., p. 561. (212) — (1907). Allgemeine Phyaiologie. Jena. Fourth edition. BIBLIOGRAPHY 483 (218) WAGER, H. (1900). On the Eyespot and Flagellum of Euglena viridia. J.L.S., xxvii., p. 463. (214) WALLENGREN, H Q902). Inanitionseracheinungen der Zelle. Z.a.P., i., p. 67. (215) — (1002). Zur Kcnntnis der Galvanotaxis. Z.a.P., ii., p. 341. (216; WOODRUFF, L. L. (1908). Effects of Alcohol on the Life-Cycle of Infusoria. B.E., xv., p. 85. (217) — (1911). The Effect of Excretion Products of Paramecium on its Rate of Reproduction. J.E.Z., x., p. 559. (218) — and BAITSELL, G. A. (1911). The Reproduction of Paramecium aurelia in a " Constant " Culture Medium of Beef Extract. J.E.M., xi., p. 135. {219) (1911). The Temperature Coefficient of the Rate of Reproduction of Paramecium aurelia. Amer. Journ. Physiol., xxix., p. 147. (220) — and BUNZEL, H. H. (1909). The Relative Toxicity of Various Salts and Acids towards Paramecium. Amer. Journ. Physiol., xxv., p. 190. (221) ZUELZER, M. (1905). Die Einwirkung der Radiumstrahlen auf Protozoen. A.P.K., v., p. 358. (222) — (1907). Der Einfluss des Meerwassers auf die pulsierende Vaouole. 8.B.O.B., p. ,90. (223) ZTJMSTEIN, H. (1899). Morphologic und Physiologie der Euglena gracHis. Pringsheim's Jahrbiicher f. wisa. Botanik, xxxiv., j). 419. CHAPTER XI SARCODINA (a) General Works. (224) CASH, J., and HOPKINSON, J. (1905, 1909). The British Freshwater Rhizo- poda and Heliozoa. London, Ray Society, vol. i. (1905) and ii. (1909). (225) HARTOG, M. (1910). Rhizopoda. Encyclop. Brit., eleventh edition, xxiii., p. 244. (226) LEIDY, J. (1879). Freshwater Rhizopods of North America. Sep. U.S. Geol. Survey, xii. (b) Amoabaea. See also Nos. 32, 34, 36, 46, 49, 65, 71'5, 76, 81, 85, 87, 88, 90, 95, 98. 101 , 103. 131, 144-146, 156, 161, 168, 176, 178, 187, 203, 204, 222. (227) ALEXEIEFF, A. (1911). La Division nucleaire et 1'Enkystement chez quelques Amibes, I.-III. C.R.S.B., Ixx., pp. 455, 534, 588. (228) AWERINZEW, S. (1907). Die Struktur des Protoplasma und des Kerns von Amoeba proteus. Z.A., xxxii., p. 45. (229) — (1906). Die Struktur und die chemische Zusammensetzung der Gehause bei den Siisswasserrhizopoden. A.P.K., viii., p. 95. (230) — (1906). Zur Kenntnis der Siisswasserrhizopoden. A.P.K., viii., p. 112 (231) CALKINS, G. N. (1904). Evidences of a Sexual Cycle in Amoeba prottas. A.P.K., v., p. 1. (232) — (1907). Fertilization of Amceba proteus. B.B., xiii., p. 219. (233) CASAGRANDI, 0., and BARBAGALLO, P. (1897). Entamceba hominis, s. Amoeba coli. Ann. Igiene Sperimental., vii., p. 103. (234) CHATTON, E. (1910). Protozoaires parasites des Branchies des Labres : Amosba mucicola, Trichodina labrorum. A.Z.E. (5), v., p. 239. (235) CRAIG, C. F. (1908). The Amoabse in the Intestine of Mttn. Journ. Infect. Diseases, v., p. 324. (236) DOBELL, C. C. (1909). The Intestinal Protozoa of Frogs and Toads. Q.J.M.S., liii., p. 201. (237) — (1909). Physiological Degeneration and Death in Entamosba ranarum. Q.J.M.S., liii., p. 711. (238) DOFLEIN, F. (1907). Amobenstudien. A.P.K., Suppl. i., p. 250. (239) — (1907). 'Der Teilungsvorgang bei den Siisswasserthalamophoren. 8.B.G.M.P., xxiii. (240) FANTHAM, H. B. (1910). The Protozoa Parasitic in the Red Grouse, etc. P.Z.8., 1910, p. 692. 484 THE PROTOZOA (241) FANTHAM, H. B. (1911). The Amoeba) Parasitic in the Human Intestine. A.T.M.P., v., p. 111. (242) GATIDICHEATT, A. (1908). Formation de Corps spirillaire dans une Culture d'Amibe (Entamceba phagocytoides). C.R.8.B., Ixiv., p. 493. (243) GOULD, L. J. (1894). The Minute Structure of Pdomyxa palustris. Q.J.M.S. xxx vi., p. 295. (244) GEBIQ, E. D. W., and WELLS, R. T. (1911). Dysentery and Liver Abscess in Bombay. 8.M.I., 47. (245) GBOSSE-ALLEBMANN, W. (1909). Amoeba terricola. A.P.K., xvii., p. 203. (246) GRUBER, K. (1911). Eigenartige Korperformen von Amceba proteua. A.P.K., xxiii., p. 253. *(247) HAKTMANN, M. (1911). Die Dysenteric- Amoben. Vide PKOWAZEK (14), p. 50. (248) HIOKSON, S. J. (1909). The Proteomyxa. Lankester's Treatise on Zoology, i., fasc. 1. (249) — (1909). The Lobosa. Ibid. (250) HOOGENBAAD, H. E. (1907). Vampyrella lateritia. A.P.K., viii., p. 216. (261) — (1907). Hyalodiscus rubicundus. A.P.K., ix., p. 84. (252) JURGENS (1902). Die Darmamoben und die Amobenenteritis Veroff. Militar-Sanitdtswesen», xx., p. 110. (253) LISTON, W. G., and MABTTN, C. H. (1911). Pathogenic Amoebae from Bombay. Q.J.M.S., Ivii., p. 107. (254) McCARRisoN, R. (1909). Amoeba in Intestines of Persons suffering from Goitre in Gilgit. Q.J.M.S., liii., p. 723. (255) MARTIN, C. H. (1911). Nuclear Division of the Large Amoaba from Liver Abscess. Q.J.M.S., Ivii., p. 279. (256) MEECIEE, L. (1910). L'Amibe de la Blatte (Entamosba Uattce). A.P.K., xx., p. 143. (257) METCALF, M. M. (1910). Studies upon Amoeba. J.E.Z., ix., p. 301. (258) MINCHIN, E. A. (1910). Parasites observed in the Rat-Flea (Ceratophyttus fasciatus). Hertwig's Festschrift, i., p. 289. (259) MUSGBAVE, W. E., and CLEGG, M. T. (1904). Amoabas : their Cultivation and Etiologic Significance. Manila, Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Oovt. Laboratories, Bid. Lab., xviii. (260) NERESHEIMEB, E. (1905). Vegetative Kernveranderungen bei Amoeba dofleini. A.P.K., vi., p. 147. (261) Noc, F. (1909). La Dysenterie amibienne en Cochinchine. A.I. P., xxiii., p. 177. (262) P£NARD, E. (1902). Faune Rhizopodique du Bassin du Leman. Geneva : Kundig. (263) — (1905). Les Amibes a Pellicule. A.P.K., vi., p. 175. (264) POPOFF, M. (1911). Der Entwicklungscyclus von Amosba minuta, etc. A.P.K., xxii., p. 197. (265) PBANDTL, H. (1907). Der Entwicklungskreis von AUogromia sp. A.P.K., ix., p. 1. (266) ROBEBTSON, M. (1905). Pseudospora volvocis. Q.J.M.S., xlix., p. 213. (267) SCHAUDINN, F. (1895). Teilung von Amosba binudeata. S.B.O.B., 1895, p. 130. Reprinted, Schaudinn's Arbeiten, 1911, p. 101. (268) SCHEEL, C. (1899). Fortpflanzung der Amoben. Kupffer's Festschrift, p. 569. (269) SGHEPOTIEFF, A. (1910). Amobenstudien. Zool. Jahrbiicher (Anat. u. Ontog.), xxix., p. 485. (270) SCHUBOTZ, H. (1905). Amoeba blattce und Amzba proteus. A.P.K., vi., p. 1. (271) STOLO, A. (1906). Plasmodiogonie, eine Vermehrungsart der niedersten Protozoen. Arch. Entwicldungamech., xxi., p. 111. (272) SUN, A. (1910). Uber einen Parasiten aus der Korperhohle von Ptychodera minuta. A.P.K., xx., p. 132. (274) TOPSENT, E. (1893). Pontomyxa flava. A.Z.E. (3), i., p. 385. (275) VAHLKAMPF, E. (1905). Biologic und Entwicklungsgeschiohte von Amoeba Umax. A.P.K., v., p. 167. (276) VELEY, L. J. (nee GOTTLD) (1905). Pdomyxa palustris. J.L.S., xxix., p. 374. (276-5) WALKER, E. L. (1911). Amoabae in the Manila water-supply, etc. Philip- pine Journ. Sci., vi. (B), p. 259. (277) WENYON, C. M. (1907). Protozoa in the Intestine of Mice. A.P.K., Suppl., i., p. 169. BIBLIOGRAPHY 485 (278) WERNER, H. (1911). Entamaiba coli. Vide PROWAZEK (14), p. 67. (279) WHITMORE, E. (1911). Parasitare und freilebende Amoben aus Manila und Saigon. A.P.K., xxiii., p. 71. (280) — (1911). Kulturamoben aus Manila. Ibid., p. 81. (o) Foraminifera. See also Nos. 28, 29, 35, 100, and 131. (281) AWERINZEW, S. (1910). Gromia dujardini. Z±A., xxxv., p. 425. (282) HICKSON, S. J. (1911). Polytrema and some Allied Genera. Trans. Linn. Soc. London (2), xiv., p. 443. (283) LAUTERBORN, R. (1895). Pavlinetta chromatophora. Z.w.Z., lix., p. 587. (284) LEYDEN, E. v., and SCHAUDINN, F. (1896). Leydeniagemmipara. S.B.A.B., p. 951. (285) LISTER, J. J. (1895). Life-History of the Foraminifera. Phil. Trans. (B), clxxxvi., p. 401. (286) — (1903). The Foraminifera. Lankester's Treatise vn Zoology, i., fasc. 2, p. 47. (287) — (1906). Life-History of the Foraminifera. Pres. Address Zool. Sec. Brit. Assoc., York, 1906. (288) RHUMBLER, L. (1903). Systematische Zusamraenstellung der recenten Retioulosa. A.P.K., iii., p. 181. (288-5) SWARCZEWSKY, B. (1909). Attogromia ovoidea. A.P.K., xiv., p. 396. (d) Xenophyophora. (289) ANON. (1909). The Xenophyopboridaj, F. E. Schultze (sic). Lankester's Treatise on Zoology, i., fasc. 1, p. 284. (290) SCHULZE, F. E. (1905). Die Xenophyophoren. Wiss. Ergebn. Expedition " Valdivia," xi. (291) — (1906). Die Xenophyophoren der Siboga-Expedition. Uitkomst. Siboga, iv. bis. (e) Mycetozoa. See also Nos. 69 and 127. (292) BLOMFIELD, J. E., and SCHWARTZ, E. J. (1910). The Tumours on Veronica Chamatdrys caused by Sorosphcera Veronica. Ann. Botany, xxiv., p. 35. (293) JAHN, E. (1908). Myxomycetenstudien. 7. Ceratiomyxa. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Oes., xxvirt., p. 342. (294) — (1911). Myxomycetenstudien, 8. Der Sexualakt. Ibid., xxix., p. 231. (295) LEGER, L. (1908). Sporomyxa scauri. A.P.K., xii., p. 109. (296) — and HESSE, E. (1905). Un Parasite des Otiorhynques (Mycetosporidium). C.R.S.B., Iviii., p. 92. (297) LISTER, J. J. (1909). The Mycetozoa. Lankester's Treatise on Zoology, i., fasc. 1, p. 37. (298) — (1909). Chlamydomyxa and Labyrinthula. Ibid., p. 274. (299) MARCHAND, E. F. L. (1910). Le Plasmodiophora brassicce. C.R.A.8., cl., p. 1348. (f) Heliozoa. See also Nos. 43, 64, 66, 82, 86, 129, 151, 161, 164, 174, and 207. (300) CAUI^ERY, M. (1910). Un Protozoaire Marin du Genre CUiophrys Cien- kowsky (C. marina, n. sp.). C.R. Assoc. Franc. Set., Lille, 1909, p. 708. (301) HARTOO, M. (1910). Heliozoa. Encyclop. Brit., eleventh edition, xiii., p. 232. (302) PENARD, E. (1903). Quelques Protistes Voisins des Heliozoaires ou des Flagelles. A.P.K., ii., p. 283. (303) — (1904). Les H61iozoaires d'Eau Douce. Geneva : Henry Kiindig. (304) PRZESMYCKI, A. M. (1901). Parasitisohe Protozoen aus dem inneren der Rotatorien. B.A.8.O., 19Q1, p. 358. *(305) SCHAUDINN, F. (1896). Heliozoa. Das Tierreich., Berlhi, 1896. (306) SOHOUTEDEN, H. (1907)^ Quelques FlageUes. A.P.K., ix., p. 108. (307) WELDON, W. F. R., and HICKSON, S. J. (1909). The Heliozoa. Lankester's Treatise on Zoology, i., fasc. 1, p. 14. 486 THE PROTOZOA (g) Radiolaria. See also No. 152. (308) BORGERT, A. (1911). Fremdkorperskelete bei tripyleen Radiolarien. A.P.K., xxiii, p. 126. (309) BRANDT, K. (1902). Die Colliden. A.P.K., i., p. 59. (310) BiirscHLi, O. (1906). Die ohemisohe Natur der Skajetsubstanz der Acan- tharia. Z.A., xxx., p. 784. (311) GAMBLE, F. W. (1909). The Radiolaria. Lankester's Treatise on Zoology, i., fasc. 1, p. 94. (312) HARTMANN, M., and HAMMER, E. (1909). Die Fortpflanzung von Radio- larien. S.B.Q.B., 1909, p. 228. (313) HABTOO, M. (1910). Radiolaria. Encyclop. Brit., eleventh edition, zzii., p. 802. (314) HUTH, W. (1911). Fortpflanzung von Thalassicotta. S.B.O.B., 1911, p. 1. (315) MOROFF, T. (1910). Vegetative und reproduktive Erscheinungen bei Thalaesicotta. Hertwvfs Festschrift, i., p. 73. (316) — and STIASNY, G. (1909). Bau und Entwicklung von Acanthometron pettucidum. A.P.K., xvi., p. 209. (317) SCOTT, R. (1911). On Traquairia. Ann. Botany, xxv., p. 459. (318) STIASNY, G. (1910). Die Beziehung der sog., " gelben Zellen " zu den kolonie-bildenden Radiolarien. A.P.K., xix., p. 144. CHAPTER XH MASTIGOPHORA (a) General Works. (319) HARTOG, M. (1910). Flagellata. Encyclop. Brit., eleventh edition, x., p. 44. *(320) SENN, G. (1900). Flagellata. Engler and Prantl, " Die natOrlichen Pflan- zenfamtiien," I. Teil, 1. Abth., a, p. 93. (321) WILLEY, A., and HICKSON, S. J. (1909). The Mastigophora. Lankester's Treatise on Zoology, i., fasc. 1, p. 154. (b) Flagellata. See also Nos. 41, 45, 62, 70, 71, 97, 97-5, 153, 160, 213, 223. 236, and 277. (322) ALEXEIEFF, A. (1909). Lea Flagelles Parasites de 1'Intestin des Batraciens Indigenes. G.R.8.B., Ixvii., p. 199. (323) — (1909). Trichomonas a Quatre Flagellea Anterieurs. C.R.S.B., Ixvii., p. 712. (324) — (1910). Les FlageHes IntestLnaux dea Poissons Marine. A.Z.E. (5), vi., Notes et Revue, p. i. (325) — (1911). Notes BUT les Flagelles. Ibid., p. 491. (326) — (1911). " Kystesde Trichomonas intestinalis." C.R.S.B., Ixxi., p. 296. (327) — (1911). . La Position des Monadides dans la Systematique des Flagelles, etc. B.8.Z.F., xxxvi., p. 96. (328) BBNSEN, W. (1909). Trichomonas intestinalis und vaginalis des Menschen. A.P.K., xyiii., p. 115. (329) BERLINER, E. (1909). Flagellaten-Studien. A.P.K., xv., p. 297. (380) BOHNE, A., and PROWAZEK, S. v. (1908). Zur Frage der Flagellatendysen- terie. A.P.K., xii., p. 1. (331) CHATTON, E. (1911). Pleodorina californica a Banyuls-sur-Mer. Bull. Set. Franc. Belg. (7), xliv. p. 309. (332) COMBS, S. (1910). Lophophora vacuolata. Boll. Ace. Oioen. Catania (2), xiii., p. 11. (333) — (1910). A Proposito del Dimorfismo sessuale riscontrato in Dinenympha gracilis. Ibid., p. 20. (334) DANILEWSKY, W. B. (1886). line Monade (Hexamitus), Parasite du Sang. Arch. Slav. Biol., -i., p. 85. (335) DOBELL, C. C. (1908). Structure and Life-History of Copromonas subtilis. Q.J.M.8., Hi., p. 75. BIBLIOGRAPHY 487 (336) DOBEIJO, C. C. (1908). The " Autogamy " of Bodolacertce. B.C., xxviii , p. 648. (337) FOA, A. (1905). Due nuovi Flagellati parassiti (Oalonympha grassii and Devescovina striata). Rend. Ace. Lincei, xiv. (2), p. 542. (338) GRASSI, B., and FOA, A. (1904). Prooesso di Divisione delle Joenie e Forme affini. Ibid., xiii. (ii.)( p. 241. (339) HAASB, G. (1910). Euglena sanguinea. A.P.K., xx., p. 47. (340) HAMBUEOBB, C. (1905). Dunalietta salina und eine Amobe aus Salinen- wasser von Cagliari. A.P.K., vi., p. 111. (341) — (1911). Euglena ehrenbergii, insbesondere die Korperhulle. Sitz-ber. Heidelberg. Ak. Wise., 1911. (342) HARTMANN, M. (1910). Bau und Entwicklung der Trichonymphiden (Trichonympha hertwigi). Hertwig's Festschrift, i., p. 349. (343) HASWBLL, W. A. (1907). Parasitic Euglenss. Z.A.. xxxi., p. 296. (344) KBYSSBLITZ, G. (1908). Studien aber Protozoen. A.P.K., xi., p. 334. (345) LATTTERBOBN, R. (1895). Eine Siisswasserart der Gattung Multicilia (M. lacustris). Z.w.Z., lx., p. 236. (345-5) — • (1911). Pseudopodien bei Ghrysopyxis. Z.A., xxxviii., p. 46. (346) LIKBETANZ, E. (1910). Die parasitische Protozoen des Wiederkauermagens. A.P.K., xix., p. 19. (347) LOHMANN, H. (1902), Die Coccolithophoridse. A.P.K., i., p. 89. (348) MARTIX, C. H., and ROBEBTSON, M. (1911). Caacal Parasites of Fowls, etc. Q.J.M.S., Ivii., p. 53. (349) MOBOFF, T. (1903). Einige Flagellaten. A.P.K., Hi., p. S9. (350) NEBBSHEIMEB, E. (1911). Costia necatrix. Vide PROWAZEK (14), p. 98. (351) Noc, F. (1909). Le Cycle evolutif de Lamblia intestinalis. B.8.P.E., ii., p. 93. (352) PASCHBB, A. (1910). Chrysomonaden aus dem Hirsohberger Grossteiohe. Leipzig : Werner Klinkhardt. (353) PLIMMER, H. G. (1909). Report on Deaths at the Zoological Gardens during 1908. P.Z.8., 1909, p. 125. (354) PBOWAZBK, S. v. (1903). Flagellatenstudien. A.P.K., ii., p. 195. (355) — (1904). Einige parasitisohe Flagellaten. A.K.Q.A., xxi., p. 1. (356) RODENWALDT, E. (1911). Trichomonas, Lamblia. Vide PBOWAZEK (14), p. 78. (357) SCHERFFEL, A. (1911). Die Chrysomonadineen. A.P.K., xxii., p. 299. (368) SBNN, G. (1911). Oxyrrhis, Nephroselmia und einige Euflagcllaten. Z.w.Z., xcvii., p. 605. (369) STEIN, F. (1878, 1883). Der Organismus der Infusionsthiere. III. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engclmann. (360) STBVBKSON, A. C. (1911), The Protozoa parasitic in Bufo regularis. in Khartoum. Sep. Wellcome Lab. Khartoum, iv., p. 359. (361) WEKYOK, 0. M. (1910). A Flagellate of the Genus Gercomonas. Q.J.M.S., Iv., p. 241. (362) — (1910). Macrostoma mesnUi from the Human Intestine. Py., iii., p. 210. (o) Dinoflagellata and Cystoflagellata. (363) BOBGEBT, A. (1910). Kern- und Zellteilung bei marinen Ceratium-Arten. A.P.K., xx., p. 1. (364) CAULLBBY, M. (1910). EUobiopsis chattoni, Parasite de Calanus helqolandicus Butt. Sci. Front;. Belg. (7), xliv., p. 201. (365) CotmfeBE, H. (1911). Lea Ettobiopsis des Crevettes bathypelaciques. G.S.A.S., elii., p. 409. (366) CHATTON, E. (1906). Les Blastodinides. C.R.A.8., cxliii., p. 981. (367) — (1907). Nouvel Aper9u sur les Blastodinides (Apodinium mycetoides). O.R.A.8., cxliv., p. 282. (368) — (1910). Sur 1'Existence de Dinoflagelles parasites ccelomiques. Les Syndinium cnez les Cop6podes p61agiques. G.R.A.8., cli., p. 654. (369) — (1910). Paradinium poucheti, Flagell6 parasite d'Acartia clausi. C.R.8.B., Ixix., p. 341. (370) DOOIEL, V. (1906). Die Peridinien. Mitih. Zool. Stat. Neapcl, xviii., p. 1. (371) DuBOSCQ, O., and COLLIN, B. (1910). La Reproduction sexuw d'un Pro- tiste parasite des Tintinnides. G.R.A.8., cli., p. 340. (372) JOLLOS, V. (1910). Dinoflagellatenstudien. A.P.K., xix., p. 178. (373) KOPOID, C. A. (1905). Craspedotella, a New Genus of the Cystoflaeeilata. Bull. Mus. Harvard, xlvi., p. 163. 488 THE PROTOZOA (374) KOFOID, C. A. (1906). Asymmetry in Triposolenia. Unt\j. California PiM. Zoct., iii., p. 127. (375) — (1906). Structure of Gonyaulax triacantha. Z.A., xxx., p. 102. (376) — (1907). Structure and Systematic Position of Polykrikos. Ibid., xxxi., p. 291. (377) — (1907). The Plates of Ceratium. Hid., xxxii., p. 177. (378) — (1908). Exuviation, Autotomy, and Regeneration, in Ceratium. Univ. California PuU. Zool., iv., p. 345. (379) — (1909). On Peridiniur.i steini. A.P.K., xvi., p. 25. (380) — (1909). Morphology of the Skeleton of Podolampas. Ibid. p. 48. (381) — (1909). Mutations in Ceratium. Bull. Mus. Harvard, Iii., p. 211. (382) — (1910). A Revision of the Genus Ceratocorys. Univ. California Pvbl. Zool., vi., p. 177. (383) — (1910). Forms of Asymmetry of the Dinoflagellates. Proc. Internal. Congr. Zool., vii. (384) KtrSTBR, E. (1908). Eine kultivierbare Peridinee. A.P.K., xi., p. 351. (385) PLATE, L. (1906). Pyrodinium bahamense. A.P.K., vii., p. 411. (386) SCHUTT, F. (1895). Die Peridineen der Plankton-Expedition. Ergebn. Plankton-Exped., iv. (387) STEIN, F. (1883). Der Organismus der Infusprien. III. (ii.) Die Natur- geschichte der Arthrodelen Flagellaten. Leipzig : W. Engelmann. (a) General Works. See also the Bulletin of the Sleeping Sickness Bureau, London, for abstracts and reviews of literature. (388) ALEXEIEFF, A. (1911). La Structure des " Binucleates " de Hartmann. C.R.8.B., Ixix., p. 532. (389) BRTTMPT, E. (1908). L'Origine des Hemoflagelles du Sang des Vertebres. C.R.8.B., Ixiv., p. 1046. (390) HARTMANN, M., and JOLLOS, V. (1910). Die Flagellatenordnung " Binu- cleata." A.P.K., xix., p. 81. *(391) LAVEBAN, A., MJESNIL, F., and NABARRO, D. (1907). Trypanosomes and Trypanosomiases. London : Bailliere, Tindall and Cox. *(392) LiJHE, M. (1906). Die im Blute schmarotzenden Protozoen. Mense's Handbuch der Tropenkrankheiten, iii., p. 69. *(393) PATTON, W. S. (1909). Our Present Knowledge of the Hsemoflagellates and Allied Forms. Py., ii., p. 91. *(394) THIMM, C. A. (1909). Bibliography of Trypanosomiasis. London : Sleep- ing Sickness Bureau. *(395) WOODCOCK, H. M. (1909). The Hsemofiagellates and Allied Forms. Lan- kester s Treatise on Zoology, i., fasc. 1, p. 193. (b) Trypanosoma and Trypanoplasma. See also Nos. 19, 22, 23, 27, 42, 56, 132, 134, 686, and 696. (396) BALDREY, F. S. H. (1909). Die Entwicklung von Trypanosoma lewisiia. der Ratten laus Hasmatopinus spinulosus. A.P.K., xv., p. 326. (397) — (1911 Evolution of T. evansi through the Fly: Tabanus and Stomoxys. Journ, Trop. Veterin. Sci., vi., p. 271. (398) Bosc, F. J. (1904). La Structure etl'Appareil Nucleaire des Trypanosomes. A.P.K., v., p. 40. (399) BOUET, G. (1906). Culture du Trypanosome de la Grenouille (T. rotatorium). A.LP., xx., p. 564. (400) — and ROTTBAUD, E. (1910). Transmission des Trypanosomes par les Glossines, I. and II. A.LP., xxiv., p. 668. III., B.S.P.E., iii.. p. 599. IV., Rid., p. 722. (401) BOTTFFARD, O. (1910). Glossina palpalis et T. Cazalboui. A.I. P., xxiv. p. 276. BIBLIOGRAPHY 489 (402) BRADFORD, J. R., and PLIMMER, H. G. (1902). The T. Irucii found in Nagana, or Tse-tse Fly Disease. Q.J.M.S., xlv., p. 449. (403) BREINL, A., and KINDLE, E. (1910). Life-History of T. lewisi in the Rat- Louse. A.T.M.P., iii., p. 553. (404) BRUCE, D. (1911). Morphology of T. evansi. P.R.8. (B), Ixxxiv., p. 181. (405) — (1911). Morphology of T. gambiense. Ibid., p. 327. (406) — and BATEMAN, H. R. (1908). Have Trypanosomes an Ultramioroscopical Stage in their Life-History ? (No >) P.R.S., (B), Ixxx., p. 394. (407) — HAMERTON, A. E., BATEMAN, H. R., and MACKIE, F. F. (1909). T. ingens, n. sp. P.R.8. (B), Ixxxi., p. 323. (408) — (1909). Development of T. gambiense in Glosaina palpalis. Ibid., p. 405. (409) (1909). A Trypanosome in the African Elephant. Ibid., p. 414. (410) (1910). Development of Trypanosomes in Tsetse Flies. Ibid., Ixxxii., p. 368. (411) (1910, 1911). Trypanosome Diseases of Domestic Animals in Uganda, I-V. Ibid., Ixxxii., p. 468 ; Ixxxiii., pp. 1, 15, 176, and 180. (412) (1910). The Natural Food of Olossina palpalis. Ibid., Ixxxii., p. 490. (413) (1910). Mechanical Transmission of Sleeping Sickness by the Tsetse Fly. Ibid., p. 498. (414) (1911). Experiments to Ascertain if T. gambiense during its Development within Glossina palpalis is Infective. Ibid., Ixxxiii., p. 345. (415) (1911). Further Researches on the Development of T. gam- biense in Olossina palpalis. Ibid., p. 513. (416) and BRUCE (LADY) (1911). T. gattinarum. Sep. Sleeping Sickness Comm., xi., No. 32, p. 170. (417) (1911). A Trypanosome found in the Blood of a Crocodile. Ibid., No. 36, p. 184 (418) BRUMPT, E. (1906). Le Mode de Transmission des Trypanosomes et dea Trypanoplasmes par les Hirudinees. C.R.8.B., Ixi., p. 77. (419) — (1907). L'Heredite des Infections a Trypanosomes et a Trypanoplasmes chez les Hotes intermediaires. Ibid., Ixiii., p. 176. (420) BUCHANAN, G. (1911). Developmental Forms of T. brucei (pecaudi) in the Internal Organs of the Gerbil. P.R.8. (B), Ixxxiv., p. 161. (421) CARINI, A. (1910). Stades Endoglobulaires des Trypanosomes. A.I. P., xxiv., p. 143. (422) — (1910). Formas de Eschizogonia do T. lewisi. Soc. de Med. e Cir. de Sao Paulo, August 16, 1910 (quoted from B.I.P., ix., p. 937). (423) — (1911). Presence de Trypanosomes chez les bovides, a Sao Paulo. B.S.P.E., iv., p. 191. (424) — (1911). Schizogonien bei Trypanosomen. A.P.K., xxiv., p. 80. (425) CHAOAS, C. (1909). Eine neue Trypanosomiasis des Menschen. M.I.O C , i., p. 159. (426) — (1911). Le Cycle de " Schizotrypanum cruzi " chez 1'Homme et les Animaux de Laboratoire. B.S.P.E., iv., p. 467. (427) CRAWLEY, H. (1910). T. americanum from the Blood of American Cattle. Journ. Comp. Path. Therap., xxiii., p. 17. (428) DARLING, S. T. (1911). Murrina. Journ. Infect. Diseases, viii., p. 467. (429) — (1911). Mode of Infection and Methods of Controlling an Outbreak of Equine Trypanosomiasis in the Panama Canal Zone. 'Py., iv., p. 83. (430) DOFLEIN, F. (1909). Problem der Protistehkunde. I. Die Trypanosomen. Jena: G. Fischer. (431) — (1910). Experimented Studien fiber die Trypanosomen des Frosches. A.P.K., xix., p. 207. (432) DUTTON, J. E.. TODD, J. L., and TOBEY, E. N. (1906, 1907). Certain Para- sitic Protozoa observed in Africa. Part I., Liverpool Trop. Med. Memoirs, xx., p. 87. Part II., A.T.M.P., i., p. 287. (433) ELDERS, C. (1909). Trypanosomiasis beim Menschen auf Sumatra. C.B.B.P.K. (I Abth. Orig.). liii., p. 42. (434) FANTHAM, H. B. (1911). life-History of T. gambiense and T. rhode- siense as seen in Rats and Guinea-pigs. P.R.S. (B), Ixxxiii., p. 212. 490 THE PROTOZOA (435) FISCHER, W. (1911). Zur Kenntnis der Trypanosomen. Z.H., Ixx., p. 93. (436) FRANCA, C. (1908). La Biologie des Trypanosomes. AJ.C.P., ii., p. 43. (437) — (1908). Le Cycle Evolutif dea Trypanosomes de la Grenouille. Ibid,, p. 89. (438) — .(1908). Le Trypanosome de 1'Anguille (T. granulosum). Ibid., p. 113. (439) — (1910). Un Trypanosome du Lerot (T. dyomia). Ibid., iii., p. 41. (440) — (1911). H£matozoaires de la Guinee Portuguaise. Ibid., pp. 201, 229. (441) — (1911). Les Hematozoaires des Taupes. Ibid., p. 271. (442) (1911). Relation autogenetique entre les grands et lea petita Trypano- somes de la Grenouille. O.B.S.B., Ixx., p. 978. (443) — (1911). La Transformation "in vitro des Formes crithidiennea de " T. rotatorium " en Formes 'trypanoaomiques. B.S.P.E., iv., p. 634. (444) FRIEDRICH, L. (1909). Bau und Naturgeschichte des Trypanoplasma helicis. A.P.K., xiv., p. 363. (445) FRY..W. B. (1911). The Extrnaion of Granules by Trypanoaomes. P.R.S. (B), Ixxxiv., p. 79. (445'5) GONDER, R. (1911). Arzneifeate Mikroorganismen. I. T. lewisi. G.B.B.P.K. (I Abth. Orig.), hd., p. 102. (446) HAMBURGER, C. (1911). Einige parasitiache Flagellaten. Verh. Heidelberg. Naturhist.-Med. Ver. (n. F.), xi., p. 211. (447) HARTMANN, M. (1910). Eine weitere Art der Schizogonie bei Schizotrypanum cruzi. A.P.K., xx., p. 361. (448) HINDLE, E. (1909). Life-History of T. dimorphon. Univ. California Publ. Zool., vi., p. 127. (449) — (1910). Degeneration Phenomena of T. gambiense. Py., iii., p. 423. (450) — (1910). A Biometrio Study of T. gambiense. Ibid., p. 455. (451) — (1911). The Passage of T. aambiense through Mucous Membranes and Skin. Ibid., iv., p. 25. (452) JOLLOS, Vi (1910). Bau und Vermehrung von Trypanoplasma helicis. A.P.K., xxi., p. 103. (453) KEYSSELITZ, G. (i904). Trypanophis grobbeni. A.P.K., iii., p. 367. (454) — (1906). Generationa- und "Wirtawechsel von Trypanoplasma borreli. A.P.K., vii., p. 1. (455) — (1907). Die undulierende Membran bei Trypanoaomen und Spiroohaten. A.P.K., x., p. 127. (456) — and MAYER, M. (1908). Die Entwioklung von T. brucei in Olosslna fusca. A.8.T.H., xii.. p. 532. (457) KUMNE, F. (1909). Positive Infectionaversuche mit T. brucei durch Gloasinn polpalis. Deutich. Med. Wochenschr., xxxv., p. 469. Die Entwioklung von Trypanosomen in Glossinen. Ibid., p. 924. Die Aetiologie der Schlafkrankheit. Ibid., p. 1257. Tsetseniegen und Try- panoaomen. Ibid., p.' 1956. (458) — (1910). Trypanosomenbefunde am Tanganyika. Ibid., xxxvi., p. 1400. (459) — and TAUTE, M. (1911). Erganzungen zu unseren Trypanosomenstudien. A.K.O.A., xxxi., p. 321. Reprinted as " Trypansomenatudien." (460) KOCH, R., BECK, M., and KLEINS, F. (1909). Die Tatigkeit der zur Erfor- schung der Sohlafkrankheit im Jahre 1906-07 nach Oatafrika entsandten Kommission. A.K.O.A., xxxi., p. 1. (461) LAVERAN, A. (1911). Identification et Classification des Trypanosomes des MammiftTes. A.I.P., xxv., p. 497. (462) — (1911). Les Trypanosomes, ont-ils dea Formes latentes ohez leurs Hotea vert^br^s ? C.B.A.S., cliii., p. 649. (464) — and MESNIL, F. (1902). Des Trypanosomes des Poiasons. A.P.K., i.. p. 475. (465) — and PETTIT, A. (1910). Des Trypanoaomea du Mulot et du Campagnol (T. grosi et T. microti). C.B.8.B., Ixviii., p. 571. (466) (1910). Le Trypanosome du Lerot (Myoxus nitela) et la Puce qui parait le propager (T. blanchardi). Ibid., p. 950. (467) LEBAILLY, C. (1906). Lea H4matozoairea paraaites dea Tel&>ateens marina. Arch. Parasitol., x., p. 348. (468) LEBEDEFF, W. (1910). T. rotatorium, Gruby. Hertwig's Festschrift, i., p. 397. (469) MACHADO, A. (1911). Zytologische Untersuchungen fiber T. rotatorium, Gruby. M.I.O.G., iii., p. 108. (470) MANTEUFEL (1909). Studien fiber die Trypanosomiasis der Ratten. A.K.G.A., xxxiii., p. 46. BIBLIOGRAPHY 491 (471) MARTIN, C. H. (1910). Trypanoplasma congeri — I. The Division of the Active Form. Q.J.M.8., lv., p. 485. (472) MARTIN, G., LEBOTOF, A., and ROTTBATJD, E. (1908). Transmission du " Nagana " par les Stomoxes et les Moustiques. B.8.P.E., i., p. 355. (473) MATHIS, C., and LEOER, M. (1911). Parasitologie et Pathologic humaines et animates au Tonkin. Paris : Masson et Cie. (474) MESNIL, F. (1910). L'Identification de quelques Trypanosomes pathogenes. S.S.P.E., Hi., p. 376. (475) — and BRIMONT, E. (1908). Un Hematozoaire nouveau (Endotrypanum) d'un EdentS de Guyane. C.R.8.B., Ixv., p. 581. (476) MINCHIN, E. A. (1908). The Development of Trypanosomes in Tsetse-Flies and Other Diptera. Q.J.M.S., lii., p. 159. (477) — (1908). Polymorphism of T. gambiense. Py., i., p. 236. (478) — (1909). The Flagellates parasitic in the Blood of Freshwater Fishes. P.Z.8., 1909, p. 2. (479) — (1909). Structure of T. lewisi in Relation to Microscopical Technique. Q.J.M.S., liii., p. 755. (480) — and THOMSON, J. D. (1910). Transmission of T. lewisi by the Rat-Flea (Ceratophyttus fasciatus). P.R.8. (B.), Ixxxii., p. 273. (481) (1911). Transmission of T. lewisi by the Rat-Flea. Brit. Ned. Journ., 1911, i., p. 1309. (482) (1911). An Intracellular Stage in the Development of T. lewisi in the Rat-Flea. Ibid., ii. (August 19), pp. 361-364. (483) — and WOODCOCK, H. M. (1910). Blood-Parasites of Fishes occurring at Rovigno. Q.J.M.8., lv., p. 113. (484) MOORE, J. E. S., and BREINL, A. (1907). Cytology of the Trypanosomes, part i. A.T.M.P., i., p. 441. (485) (1908). T. equiperdum. P.R.S. (B.), Ixxx., p. 288. (486) and KINDLE, E. (1908). Life-History of T. lewisi. A.T.M.P., ii., p. 197. *(487) NERESHEIMER, E. (1911). Die Gattung Trypanoplasma. Vide PROWAZEK (14), p. 101. (488) NEUMANN, R. O. (1909). Prdtozoische Parasiten im Blut von Meeresfischen. Z.H., biv., p. 1. (489) NOVY, F. G., and McNEAL, W. J. (1905). Trypanosomes of Birds. Journ. Infect. Diseases, ii., p. 256. (490) and TORREY, H. N. (1907). Trypanosomes of Mosquitoes and Other Insects. Ibid., iv., p. 223. (491) OTTOLENQHI, D. (1908). T. Iruceiund T. equinum. C.B.B.P.K. (I. Abth. Orig.), xlvii., p. 473. (492) — (1909). Die Entwicklung einigor pathogener Trypanosomen im Sau- getierorganismus. A.P.K., xviii., p. 48. (493) PATTON, W. S., and STRICKLAND, C. (1908). The Relation of Blood-sucking Invertebrates to the Life-Cycles of Trypanosomes. Py., i., p. 322. (494) PETRIE, G. F. (1905). The Structure and Geographical Distribution of Certain Ti vpanosomes. J.H., v., p. 191. (495) — and AVAKI, C. R. (1909), On the Seasonal Prevalence of T. lewisi in Mus rattus and in Mus decumanus. Py., ii., p. 305. (496) POLICARD, A. (1910). Sur la Coloration vitale des Trypanosomes. C.R.S.B., Ixviii., p. 505. (497) PROWAZEK, S. v. (1905). Studien iiber Saugetiertrypanosomen. A.K.G.A., xxii., p. 351. (498) — (1909). Kritische Bemerkungen zum Trypanosomenproblem. A.8.T.H., xiii., p. 301. (499) ROBERTSON, M. (1906). Certain Blood-inhabiting Protozoa. Proc. R. Phys. Soc. Edinburgh., xvi.. p. 232. (500) — (1907). A Trypanosome found in the Alimentary Canal of PontobdeUa muricata. /6td., xvii., p. 83. (501) — (1909). Life-Cycle of T. vitiates. Q.J.M.8., liii., p. 665. (502) — (1909). A Trypanosome found in the Alimentary Tract of PontobdeUa muricata. Q.J.M.8., liv., p. 119. (503) — (1911). Transmission of Flagellates living in the Blood of Fishes. PML Trans. (B.), ccii., p. 29. (504) RODENWALDT, E. (1909). T. lewisi in Hcematopinus spinulosus. C.B.B.P.K. (I Abth. Orig.), lii., p. 30. 492 THE PROTOZOA (605) ROSENBTJSCH, F. (1909). Trypanosomen-studien. A.P.K., xv., p. 263. (506) ROUBAUD, E. (1909). Les Trypanosomes pathogenes et la Glossina palpalis. Rapport de la Mission d'Etudea de la Maladie du Sommeil au Congo Fran- $ais (Paris, Masson et Cie.), p. 511. (507) — (1910). Ph6nom£nes morphologiques du Devetoppement des Trypano- somes chez les Glossines. G.R.A.S., cli., p. 1156. (508) STASSANO, H. (1901). La Fonction et Relation du petit Noyau des Trypano- somes. C.R,8.B., liii., p. 468. (509) STEPHENS, J. W W., and FANTHAM, H. B. (1911). Peculiar Morphology of a Trypanosome from a Case of Sleeping Sickness (T. rhodesiense). P.R.8. (B.), Ixxxiii., p. 28. (510) STOCKMAN, S. (1910). A Trypanosome of British Cattle. Journ. Comp. Pathol. Therapeut xxiii., p. 189. (511) STRICKLAND, C. (1911). Mechanism of Transmission of T. lewisi by the Rat- Flea. Brit. Med. Journ., 1911, p. 1049. (512) — and SWELLENGREBEL, N. H. (1910). On T. lewisi and its Relation to Certain Arthropoda. Py., iii., p. 436. (513) STUHLMANN, F. (1907). Die Tsetsefliegen (Glossina fusca und Gl. tachinoides). A.K.G.A., xxvi., p. 301. (514) SWELLENGREBEL, N. H. (1909). Bau und Zellteilung von T. gambiense und T. equinum. Tijdschr. Ned. Dierk. Ver. (2), xi., p. 80. (515) — (1910). Fixation and Staining of T. lewisi. Py., hi., p. 226. (516) — (1910). Normal and Abnormal Morphology of T. lewisi. Ibid, p. 459. (517) — and STRICKLAND, C. (1910). The Development of T, lewisi outside the Vertebrate Host. Ibid., p. 360. (518) (1911). Remarks on Dr. Swingle's Paper, "The Transmission of T. lewisi by Rat-Fleas," etc. Ibid., iv., p. 105. (519) SWINGLE, L. D. (1907). On T. lewisi. Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc., xxvii., p. 111. (520) — (1G11). Transmission of T. lewisi by Rat-Fleas. Three New Herpeto- monads. Journ. Infect. Diseases, viii., p. 125. (521) TAUTE, M. (1911). Die Beziehungen der Glossina. morsitans zur Schlaf- krankheit. Z.H., Ixix., p. 553. (522) THIROTTX, A. (1905). T. paddas. A.I.P., xix., p. 65. (523) — (1905). T. duttoni. Ibid., p. 564. (524) THOMSON, J. D. (1906). Blood-Parasites of the Mole. J.H., vi., p. 574. (525) — (1908). Cultivation of the Trypanosome found in the Blood of the Gold- fish. Ibid., viii., p. 75. (516) WEBBITZKI, F. W. (1910). Blepharoplastlose Trypanosomen. C.B.B.P.K. (I Abth. Orig.), liii., p. 303. (See also Bulletin of the Sleeping Sickness Bureau, vol. iii., pp. 221, 313, and 458, for further references.) (527) WOODCOCK, H. M. (1910). On Certain Parasites of the Chaffinch (Fringilla calebs) and the Redpoll (Linota rufescens). Q.J.M.8., Iv., p. 641. (528) YAKIMOJTF, W. L., KOHL-YAKIMOFF, N., and KORSSAK, D. W. (1910). T. korssaki of Mus agrarius, Piroplasmoses of Mus agrarius, Reindeer, Yak, and Bears. C.B.B.P.K. (I Abth. Orig.), Iv., p. 370. (529) ZUPITZA, M. (1909). Die Vogel- und Fischtrypanosomen Kameruns. A.8.T.H., xiii., Beiheft 3, p. 101. (c) Crithidia, Leptomonas, Herpetomonas, etc. See also No. 84. (530) BOUET, G., and ROUBATJD, E. (1911). La Presence au Dahomey et Trans- mission du Leptomonas davidi. C.R.8.B., Ixx., p. 55. (531) CHATTON, E. (1909). Un Trypanosomide nouveau d'une Nycteiibie, et les Relations "des Formes Trypanosoma, Herpetomonas, Leptomonas et Crithidia. C.R.8.B., Ixvii., p. 42. (532) — and ALILAIRK, E. (1908). Coexistence d'un Leptomonas et d'un Trypano- soma chez un Musoide non vulnerant, DrosophUa confusa. C.R.8.B., Ixiv., p. 1004. (533) — and LE'GER, A. (1911). Eutrypanosomes, Leptomonas et Leptotrypano- somes chez DrosophUa confusa (Muscide). C.R.S.B., Ixx., p. 34. (534) (1911). Quelques Leptomonas de Muscides et leura Leptotrypano- somes. Ibid., p. 120. (535) DTTNKERLY, J. S. (1911). Life-History of Lept. muscce-domesticce. Q.J.M.8., Ivi., p. 645. BIBLIOGRAPHY 493 (536) FLTT, P. C. (1911). Die im Darm der Stubeniliege vorkommendcn proto- zoaren Gebilde. C.B.B.P.K. (I Abth. Orig.), Ivii., p. 622. (537) FRANCA, C. (1911). L'Existence en Portugal de Lept. davidi dans le Latex de Euphorbia peplus et E. segetalis. B.8.P.E., iv., p. 532. (538) — (1911). Notes BUT Lept. davidi. Ibid., p. 669. (539) GEORGEWITCH, J. (1909). Le developpementde Crithidia simulicB. C.R.S.B., Ixvii., p. 517. (640) LAFONT, A. (1910). La Presence d'un Leptomonas . . . dans le Latex de Trois Euphorbiacees. A.I. P., xxiv., p. 205. (541) — (1911). La Transmission du Lept. davidi des Euphorbes par un Hemip- tere. C.R.8.B., Ixx., p. 58. (542) LKGER, L. (1902). La Structure et Multiplication des Flagelles du Genre Herpetomonas Kent. C.R.A.S., cxxxiv., p. 781. (543) _ (1902). Un Flagelld Parasite de 1' Anopheles macvlipennis. G.R.8.B., liv., p. 354. (544) — (1904). Un nouveau Flagelle, Parasite des Tabanides. C.R.8.B., Ivii., p. 613. (545) — (1904). Les Affinites de V Herpetomonas subulate et la Phylogenie des Trypanosomes. C.R.8.B., Ivii., p. 615. (546) — and DUBOSCQ, O. (1909). Parasites de 1'Intestin d'une Larve de Ptychop- tera. Butt. Acad. Bdgique, No. 8, p. 885. (547) MACKINNON, D. L. (1910). New Parasites from Triohoptera. Py., iii., p. 245. (648) — (1910). Herpetomonads from Dung-Mies. Ibid., p. 255. (549) — (1911). More Protozoan Parasites from Trichoptera. Ibid., iv., p. 28. (650) PATTON, W. S. (1908). Life-Cycle of a Species of Crithidia parasitic in Oerris fossarum. A.P.K., xii., p. 131. (551) — (1908). Herp. lygasi. A.P.K., xiii., p. 1. (552) — (1909). Life-Cycle of a Species of Crithidia parasitic in Tabanus hUarius and Tabaniu sp. A.P.K., xv., p. 333. (553) — (1910). Infection of the Madras Bazaar Fly with Herp. mv*coe-domestico3. B.U.P.E., iii., p. 264. (554) PORTER, A. (1910). Crithidia melophagia. Q.J.M.8., Iv., p. 189. (555) — (1909). Crithidia gerridis. Py., ii., p. 348. (556) — (1909). Life-Cycle of Herp. jaculum. Ibid., p. 367. (557) PROWAZEK, S. v. (1904). Die Entwicklung von Herpetomonas. A.K.G.A., xx., p. 440. (567'5) ROUBATTD, E. (1911). Cysioirypanosoma inteslinalis. C.R.S.B., Ixxi., p. 306. (568) STRICKLAND, C. (1911). A Herpetomonas parasitic in the common Green- bottle Fly, Luctiia sp. Py., iv., p. 222. (559) SWBLLENGREBEL, N. H. (1911). Morphology of Herpetomonas and Crithidia, etc. Ibid., p. 108. (560) WERNER, H. (1908). Eine eingeisselige Flagellatenform im Darm der Stubenfliege. A.P.K., xiii., p. 19. (d) Leishmania, etc. See also No. 84. For references to literature and critical summaries and reviews, see Kola Azar Bulletin (Royal Society, London). (561) BASILS, C. (1910). Leishmaniosi del Cane e 1'Ospite intermedio del Kala- Azar infantile. Send. Ace. Lincei (5), xix. (2), p. 523. (562) — (1911). Trasmissione delle Leishmaniosi. Ibid. (5), xx. (1), p. 50. (563) — (1911). Leishmaniosi e suo Modo di Trasmissione. Ibid. (5), xx. (2), p. 72. (564) — LACAVA, F., and VISENTINI, A. (1911). L' Identita delle Leishmaniosi. Ibid., p. 150. (565) DARLING, S. T. (1909). Histoplasma capsulatum and the Lesions of Histo- plasmosis. J.E.M., xi., p. 615. (566) DONOVAN, C. (1909). Kala-Azar in Madras. Bombay Medical Congress, February 24, 1909. (567) LEISHMAN, W. B., and STATHAM, J. C. B. (1905). Development of the Leishman Body in Cultivation. Journ. R. A. Med. Corps, iv., p. 321. (568) MARSHALT., W. E. (1911). Pathological Report, Kala-Azar Commission. Rep. Wellcome Lab., iv., p. 167. (569) MARZINOWSKY, E. J. (1909). Cultures de Leishmania tropica. B.8.P.E., ii., p. 591. 494 THE PROTOZOA (670) NIOOLLB. C. (1909). Le Kala-Azar infantUe. A.I.P., xxiii.. p. 361. (671) — and COMTE, 0. (1908). Origine canine du Kala-Azar. C.R.A.8*, oxlvi., p. 789. (572) Now, F. G. (1909). Leithmania infantum. B.S.P.E., ii., p. 385. (573) PATTON, W. S. (1908). The Leishman-Donovan Parasite in Cimex rotun- datus. S.M.I., xxxi. (674) — (1908). Inoculation of Dogs with the Parasite of Kala-Azar (Herpeto- rnonas [Leishmania] donovani). Py., i., p. 311. (576) — (1909). The Parasite of Kala-Azar and Allied Organisms. Trans. Soc. Trop. Med. Hygiene, ii., p. 113. (576) ROGERS, L. (1904). Trypanosomea from the Spleen Protozoic Parasites of Cachexial Fevers and Kala-Azar. Q.J.M.8., xlviii., p. 367. (577) — (1907). The Milroy Lectures on Kala-Azar. BriL Med. Jouni.. February 23, March 2 and 9. (678) Row, R. (1909). Development of the Parasite of Oriental Sore in Cultures. Q.J.M.S., liii., p. 747. (579) THIROUX, A., and TEPPAZ, L. (1909). La Lymphangite epizootiquo des Equides au Senegal. A.I. P., xxiiL, p. 420. (580) VISBNTINI, A. (1910). La Morfologia ed il Ciolo di Sviluppo della Leishmania. Istituto d. din. Med. d. R. Univ. Roma. (581) WEIGHT, J. H. (1903). Protozoa in Tropical Ulcer (" Delhi Sore "). Journ. Med. Research, x. (n.s. v.), p. 472. (e) Prowazekia. (582) ALKXEIEFF, A. (1911). La Morphologic et la Division de Bodo caudatus. C.R.S.B., Ixx., p. 130. (582-5) DUNKEKLY, J.S.(1912). Thelohania and Prowazekia in Ahthomyid Flies. C.B.B.P.K. (I Abth. Orig.), Ixii., p. 136. (583) HAETMANN, M. (1911). Die Flagellatenordnung Binudeata und die Gattung Prowazekia. A.P.K., xxii., p. 141. (584) MARTINI, E. (1910). I'r. cruzi und ihre Beziehungen zur Atiologie von ansteckenden Darmkrankheiten zu Tsingtau. Z.H., Ixvii., p. 275. (585) NAEGLER, K. (1910). Pr. parva. A.P.K., xxi., p. 111. (586) WALKER, E. L. (1910). Trypanoplaama ranee. Journ. Med. Research, xxiii., (n.s. XVIII. ), p. 391. (587) WHITMORE, E. R. (1911). Pr. asiatica. A.P.K., xxii., p. 370. CHAPTER XIV SPOROZOA— TELOSPORIDIA (a) General Works. *(588) HAGENMULLER (1899). Bibliotheoa Sporozoologica. Ann. Mus. Nat. Hist. Marseille (2), i. *(589) MINCHIN, E. A. (1903). The Sporozoa. A Treatise on Zoology (Lankester) (London, A. and C. Black), p. 150. (590) WOODCOCK, H. M. (1910). Sporozoa. Encyclop. Brit., eleventh edition, xxv., p. 734. Coccidia. Ibid., vi., p. 615. Gregarines. Ibid., xii., p. 565. Haemosporidia. Ibid., xii., p. 806. Endospora. Ibid., ix. p. 383. (b) Gregarines. See also Nos. 72, 84, and 123. (591) AWBRIHZEW, S. (1909). Die Vorgange der Schizogonie boi Gregarinen aus dem Darin von Amphiporiis sp. A.P.K., xvi., p. 71. (692) BEATJCHAMP, P. de (1910). Une Gregarine nouvelle du Genre Porospora. G.R.A.S., cli., p. 997. (693) BBRNDT, A. (1902). Die im Darme der Larvc von Tenebrio molitor lebenden Gregarinen. A.P.K., i., p. 375. (594) BRASIL, L. (1905). La Reproduction des Gregarines monooystidees. A.Z.E. (4), iii., p. 17. BIBLIOGRAPHY 495 (595) BRASIL. L. (1905). La Reproduction des Gregarines monocystidees. A.Z.E. (4), iv., p. 69. (596) — (1907). La Schizogonie et la Croissance des Gametooytes ohez Selenidium cavtteryi. A.P.K , viii., p. 370. (597) — (1909). Documents BUT quelquea Sporozoaires d'Annelides. A.P.K. , xvi., p. 107. (598) COGNETTI DB MARTIIS, L. (1911). Le Monocistidee e loro Fenomeni ripro- duttivi. A.P.K., xxiii., p. 205. (599) COMES, S. (1907). Der Chromidialapparat der Gregarinen. A.P.K., x.f p. 416. (600) CRAWLBY, H. (1905). Movements of Gregarines. Proc. Acad. Philadelphia, Ivii., p. 89. (601) CUNNINGHAM, J. T. (1907). Kalpidorhynchua arenicolce. A.P.K., x., p. 199. (602) DOOIEL, V. (1906). Cystobia chiridotce. A. P.K., vii., p. 106. (603) — (1907). Schizocystis sipuncvli. A.P.K., viii., p. 203. (604) — (1909). Die Sporocysten der Colom-Monooystideae. A.P.K., xvi., p. 194. (605) — (1910). Callynthrochlamys phronimas. A.P.K., xx., p. 60. (606) — (1910). Einige neue Catenata. Z.w.Z., xciv., p. 400.. (607) DRZEWECKI, W. (1903, 1907). Vegetative Vorgange im Kern und Plasma der Gregarinen des Regenwurmhodens. A.P.K., Hi., p. 107. II. Stomato- phora coronata. Ibid., x., p. 216. (6Q8) DUKE, H. L. (1910). Metamera schubergi. Q.J.M.S., lv., p. 261. (609) FANTHAM, H. B. (1908). The Schizogregarines. Py., i., p. 369. (610) HAIL, M. C. (1907). A Study of some Gregarines, with especial Rererenoe to Hirmocystis rigida. Stud. Zool. Lab. Univ. Nebraska, vii., p. 149. (611) HESSE, £. (1909). Les Monocystidees des Oligochetes. A.Z.E. (5), iii., p. 27. (611-5) HOFFMANN, B. (1908). Fortpflanzungsersoheinungen von Monooystideen des Lumbricus agricola. A.P.K., xiii., p. 139. (612) HUXLEY, J. 8. (1910). Ganymedes anaapidi*. Q.J.M.8., lv., p. 155. (613) KuscHAKEwrrsoH, S. (1907). Vorgange bei den Gregarinen des Mehlwurm- darms. A.P.K., Suppl. L, p. 202. (614) LrfGER, L. (1904). LA Reproduction sexuee ohez les Stylorhynchus. A.P.K., iii., p. 303. (615) — (1904). Sporozoaires Parasites de VEnibia Solieri. Ibid., p. 358. (616) — (1906). Tamiocyatis mira. A.P.K., vii., p. 307. (617) — (1907, 1909). Les Schizogregarines des Traoheates: L Ophryocystie. A.P.K., viii., p. 159. II. Schizooystis. Ibid., xviii., p. 83. (618) — and DUBOSCQ, 0. (1902). Les Gregarines et 1'Epitheliuin intestinal ohez les Traoheates. Arch. Parasitd., vi., p. 377. (619) (1903). Le Developpement des Gregarines Stylorhynchides et Steno- phorides. A.Z.E. (4), i., Notes et Revue, p. Ixxxix. (620) (1904). Les Gfegarinea et I'Epithefium intestinal des Traoheates. A.P.K., iv., p. 335. (621) (1909). La Sexualite chez les Gregarines. A.P.K., xvii., p. 19. (622) (1911). Deux nouvelles Especes de Gregarines appartonant au Genre Porwporo. Ann. Univ. Grenoble, xxiii.,p. 401. *(623) LUHE, M. (1904). Die Sporozoiten, die Wachstumsperiode und die ausge- bildeten Gregarinen. A.P.K., iv., p. 88. (624) NUSBAUM, J. (1903). Fortpflenzung einer Gregarine — Schaudinella henlecs. Z.w.Z., lxxv..p. 281. (625) PAEHLEE, F. (1904). Die Morphologic, Fortpflanzung und Entwicklung von Gregarina ovata. A.P.K., iv., p. 64. (626) PFEJTER, E. (1910). Die Gregarinen im Darm der Larve von Tenebrio molitor. A.P.K., xix., p. 107. (627) PORTER, A. (1909). Merogregarina amaroucii. A.P.K., xv., p. 228. (628) ROBINSON, M. (1910). On the Reproduction of Kalpidorhynchus arenicolce, Q.J.M.S., liv., p. 565. (629) SCHELLACK, C. (1907). Die Entwicklung und Fortpflanzung von Echinomera hispida. A.P.K., ix., p. 297. (630) — (1908). Die solitare Encystierung bei Gregarinen. Z.A., xxxii., p. 597. (631) SCHNITZLER, H. (1905). Die Fortpflaazung von Clepaidrina ovata. A.P.K., vi., p. 309. (632) WOODCOCK, H. M. (1906). Life-Cycle of " Cystobia " irregularis. Q.J.M.8. 1., p. 1. 496 THE PROTOZOA (c) Coccidia. See also Nos. 47, 83, 94, 99, and 147. *(633) BLANCHABD, R. (1900). Les Coccidies et leur Bole pathogene. Cauaeriea Sci. Soc. Zod. France, p. 133. (634) CHAGAS, C. (1910). Addea hartmanni. M.I.O.C., ii., p. 168. (635) DAKIN, W. J. (1911). Merocystis kathce. A.P.K., xxii., p. 145. (635*5) DEBAISIEUX, P. (1911). Recherches sur lea Coccidies. La Cellule, xxvii., pp. 89 and 257. (636) DOBELL, C. C. (1907). Life-History of Addea ovata. P.R.S. (B.), Ixxix., p. 155. (637) ELMASSIAN, M. (1909). Coccidium rouxi, Zoomyxa legeri. A.Z.E. (5), ii. p. 229. (638) FANTHAM, H. B. (1910). Eimeria (Coccidium) avium. P.Z.8., 1910, p. 672. (639) — (1910). Avian Coccidiosis. Ibid., p. 708. (640) HADLEY, P. B. (1911). Eimeria avium. A.P.K., xxii., p. 7. (641) JOLLOS, V. (1909). Multiple Teilung und Reduktion bei Addea ovata. A.P.K., xv., p. 249. (642) KUNZE, W. (1907). Orcheobius herpobdetta. A.P.K., ix., p. 382. (643) LAVEBAN, A., and PETTIT, A. (1910). Une Coccidie de Agama colonorum. (Cocc. agamce). G.R.8.B., Ixviii., p. 161. (644) LEGEB, L. (1911). Caryospora simplex, et la Classification des Coccidies. A.P.K., xxii., p. 71. (645) — and DUBOSCQ, 0. (1908). Involution schizogonique de I'Aggregata (Eucoccidium) eberthi. A.P.K., xii., p. 44. (646) (1910). Sdenococcidium intermedium. A.Z.E. (5), v., p. 187. (647) METZNER, R. (1903). Coccidium cuniculi. A.P.K., ii., p. 13. (648) MOBOFF, T. (1906). Addea zonula. A.P.K., viii., p. 17. (649) — and FIEBIQEB, J. (1905). Eimeria subepithdialis. A.P.K., vi., p. 166. (650) PEBEZ, C. (1903). Le Cycle evolutif de 1' Addea mesnili. A.P.K., ii., p. 1. (651) SCHELLACK, C., and REICFENOW, £. (1910). LtMofcma-Coccidien. Z.A., xxxvi., p. 380. (652) SIEDLECKI, M. (1898). La Coccidie de la Seiche. A.I.P., xii., p. 799. (653) — (1907). Caryotropha mesnilii. B.A.S.C., 1907, p. 453. (654) STEVENSON, A. C. (1911). Coccidiosis of the Intestine of the Goat. Rep. Wellcome Lab. Khartoum, iv., p. 355. (655) TYZZEB, E. E. (1910). Cryptosporidium muris of the Common Mouse. Journ. Med. Research, xxiii (n.s. XVIII.), p. 487. (656) WOODCOCK, H. M. (1904). On Klossidla muris. Q.J.M.8., xlviii., p. 153. CHAPTER XV H^EMOSPORIDIA (a) General Works. *(657) LAVEBAN, A. (1905). Haemocytozoa. B.I.P., Hi., p. 809. *(658) SCHAUDINN, F. (1899). Der Generationswechsel der Coccidien und Hsemo- sporidicn. Zod. Centralbl., vi., p. 765. (659) WASIELEWSKI (1908). Studien und Mikrophotogramme zur Kenntnisse der pathogenen Protozoen. II. Untersuchungen iiber Blutschmarotzer. Leipzig : Barth. (b) Hsemamcebae. See also Nos. 130 and 686. (660) ABAOAO, H. DE B., and NEIVA, A. (1909). Intraglobular Parasites of Lizards. PI. diploglossi and PI. tropiduri. M.I.O.C., i., p. 44. (661) BEBENBEBQ-GOSSLEB, H. V. (1909). Naturgeschichte der Malariaplas- modien. A.P.K., xvi., p. 245. (662) BEBTBAND, D. M. (1911). Les Parasites endoglobulaires pigmentes des Vertebres. Paris : Jouve et Cie. (663) BILLET, A. (1905). Une Forme particuliere de 1'Hematozoaire du Palu- disme decrite par Mil. Ed. et Et. Sergent. G.R.8.B., Iviii., p. 720. (664) — (1906). La Forme h^mogregarinienne du Parasite de la Fievre quarte. C.R.S.B., Ix., p. 891. BIBLIOGRAPHY 497 (665) BILLET, A. (1906). Diagnose differentielle des Formes snnulaires des Hematozoaires du Paludisme. C.R.8.B., hd., p. 764. (666) — (1910). Evolution chez le memo Sujet du Paludisme tierce primaire en Paludisme tierce seoondaire. B.S.P.E., iii., p. 187. (667) CARDAMATIS, J. P. (1909). Le Paludisme des Oiseaux en Gr£ce. Etude du Parasite de Danilewsky. G.B.B.P.K. (I Abth. Orig.), Iii., p. 351. (668) CASTELLANI, A., aad WILLEY, A. (1904). Haematozoa of Vertebrates in Ceylon. Spolia Zeylanica, ii., p. 78. (669) DARLING, S. T. (1910). Transmission and Prevention of Malaria in the Panama Canal Zone. A.T.M.P., iv., p. 179. (670) DOBELL, C. C. (1910). Life-History of Haemocystidium simondi. Hertwig'a Festschrift, i., p. 123. (671) FLIT, P. C. (1908). Affenmalaria. A.P.K., xii., p. 323. (672) GILETJTH, J. J., SWEET, G., and DODD, S. (1910). Proteosqma biziurce and Hcemogregarina megalocystis. Proc. Boy. Soc. Victoria (n.s.), xxiii., p. 321. (673) GRASS!, B. (1901). Die Malaria, Studien eines Zoologen. Jena : Gustav Fischer. (674) HALBERSTAEDTER, L., and PROWAZEK, S. v. (1907). Die Malariaparasiten der Affen. A.K.O.A., xxvi., p. 37. (675) HARTMANN, M. (1907). Das System der Protozoen. Zugleioh vorlaufige Mitteilung iiber Proteosoma. AtP.K., x., p. 139. (676) MAYER, M. (1908). Malariaparasiten bei Affen. A.P.K., xii., p. 314. (677) NEUMANN, R. 0. (1908). Die Ubertragung von Plasmodium prcecox auf Kanarienvogel duichStegomyiafasciata. A.P.K., xiii., p. 23. (678) Ross, R. (1910). The Prevention of Malaria. London : John Murray. (679) SERGENT, ET., and SERGENT, ED. (1910). L'lmmunite dans le Paludisme dea Oiseaux, etc. G.E.A.8., cli., p. 407. (680) THIROUX, A. (1906). Des Relations de la Fievre tropicale aveo la Quarte et la Tierce. A.I.P., xx., pp. 766 and 869. (681) VASSAL, J. J, (1907). L'Hematozoaire de 1'Ecureil (Hoemamaiba vassali). A.I.P., xxi., p. 851. (c) Halteridia. See also No. 132. (682) ANSCHTJTZ, G. (1910). Uebertragungsversuche von Hasmoproteua oryzivorcs «nd Trypanosoma paddce. C.B.B.P.K. (I Abth. Orig.), liv., p. 328. (683) ABAGAO, H. DE B. (1908). Der Entwicklungsgang und die Ubertragung von Hcemoproteus columbce. A.P.K., xii., p. 154. (684) MAYER, M. (1910). Die Entwioklung von Halteridium. A.8.T.H., xiv., p. 197. (685) — (1911). Ein Halteridium und Leucocytozoon des Waldkauzes. A.P.K,, xxi., p. 232. (685-5) MINCHIN, E. A. (1910). Report on Blood-Parasites collected by the Commission. Rep. Sleeping Sickness Comm., x., p. 73. (686) SERGENT, ED., and SERGENT, ET. (1907). Les Hematozoaires d'Oiseaux. A.I.P., xxi., p. 251. (687) WOODCOCK, H. M. (1911). An Unusual Condition in Halteridium. Z.A,, xxxviii., p. 465. (d) Leucocytozoa (Vera). See also Nos. 132, 473, and 686. (688) BERESTNEFF, N. (1904). Das Leucocytozoon Danilewskyi. A.P.K., ui., p. 376. (689) FANTHAM, H. B. (1910). Parasitic Protozoa of the Red Grouse. P.Z.8., 1910, p. 692. (690) WENYON, C. M. (1910). On the Genus Leucocytozoon. Py., iii., p. 63. (e) Hsemogregarines. See also Nos. 78, 84, and 89. (691) ADIE, J. R. (1906). "Leucocytozoon " ratti. Journ. Trap. Med., ix., p. 326 (692) ABAGAO, H. DE B. (1911). Hamogregarinen von Vogeln. M.I.O.C., iii. p. 54. (693) BALFOTTR, A. (1906). H. balfouri. Rep. WeUcome Lab. Khartoum, ii., p. 96. (694) — (1906). " Leucocytozoon" muris. Ibid., p. 110. 32 498 THE PROTOZOA (695) BSRESTNEFF, N. (1903). Eine neue Blutparasiten der indischen Frosohe. A.P.K., ii., p. 343. (696) BILLET, A. (1904). Ttypanoaoma inopinatum et Drepanidium. C.R.8.B,, Ivii., p. 161. (697) BOUET, G. (1909). Hemogregarines de 1'Afrique oocidentale fran^aise. C.R.8.B., Ixvi., p. 741. (698) CARINI, A. (1910). " H. muris." Rev. Soc. -Set. Sao Paulo, v. (699) CHRISTOPHERS. S. R. (1905). H. gerbWi. 8.M.I., 18. (700) _ (1906). Leucocytozoan canis. S.M.I., 26. (701) ._ (1907). Leucocytozoon cams in the Tick. S.M.I., 28. (703) DANILEWSKY, B. (1886). Les Hematozoairea dea Lizards. Arch. Slav. Biol., i., p. 364. (704) — (1887). Les Hematozoaires des Tortues. Ibid., Hi., pp. 33 and 370. (705) — (1889). La Parasitologie comparee du Sang. I. Nouvelles Recherch.es BUT les Hematozoaires du Sang dea Oiseaux. II. Recherches aur lea Hematozoairea dea Tortues. Kharkoff. (706) FANTHAM, H. B. (1905). Lankesteretta tritonis. Z.A., xxix., p. 257. (707) FLU, P. C. (1909). Hamogregarinen im Blute Surinamiseher Schlangen. A.P.K., xviii., p. 190. (708) FRANQA, C. (1908). Une Hemogregarine de 1'Anguille (H. letteticourli). A.LC.P., ii., p. 109. (709) — (1908). H. splendent (Labbe). Ibid., p. 123. (710) — (1909). Hemogregarinea de Lacerta oceUata. Ibid., p. 339. (711) — (1910). Parasites endocellulairea du Psammodromus dgirus. Ibid., in., p. 1. (712) — (1910). Hemogregarines de Lacerta muralis. Ibid., p. 21. (713) HAHN, C. W. (1909). H. stepanowi in the Blood of Turtles. A.P.K., xvii., p. 307. (714) JCorozuMi, M. (1910). H. gp. in Clemmyajaponicu*. ~A.P,K,, xviii., p. 260. (715) LAVERAN, A., and PETTIT, A. (1909). Lea Hemogregarinea de quelquea Sauriens d'Afrique. B.8.P.E., ii., p. 506. (716) (1910). Les Formes de Multiplication endogeue de H. «ebai. O.B.A.S., cli., p. 182. (717) (1910). H. agama. C.R.8.B., Ixviii., p. 744. (718) (1910). Le Bole d'Hyalomma Mgyptiwn L. dans la Propagation de H. mauritanica. /G.-R. Aseoc. France (Lille), p. 723. (719) MILLER, W. W. (1909). Hepatozoon perniciostim and ita Sexual Cycle in the Intermediate Host, a Mite (Lelaps echidninus). Hygienic Laboratory Bulletin, No. 46 (June, 1908). (720) NERESHEIMER, E. (1909). Das Eindringen von Lankesteretta spec, in die Froaohblutkorperchen. A.P.K., xvi., p. 187. (721) PATTON, W. S. (1906). On a Parasite found in the Blood of Palm Squirrels. 8.M.I., 24. (722) — (1908). The Haemogregarines of Mammals and Reptiles. Py., i., p. 319. (723) PORTER, A. (1908). Leucocytozoon musculi. P.Z.8., 1908, p. 703- (724) PROWAZEK, S. v. (1907). Ueber Hamogregarinen. A.K.G.A., xxvi., p. 32. (725) ROBERTSON, M. (1910). Life-Cycle of H. nicorice. Q.J.M.8., lv., p. 741. (726) SAMBON, L. W.,and SELIGMAKK, C. G. (1907). Haemogregarines of Snakes. Trans. Pathol. Soc. London, Iviii., p. 310. (727) SEITZ (1910). Die Hartmannsohe Binukleaten. C.B.B.P.K. (I. Abth. Orig.), Ivi., p. 308. (!) Piroplasms. See also No. 528. (728) BETTENCOTTBT, A., FRANCA, C., and BORQES, I. (1907). Piroplasmose bacilliforme chez le Daim. \ A.I.C.P,, i., p. 341. (729) BOWHILL, T. (1905). Equine Piroplasmosis, or "Bib'ary Fever " J.H., v., p. 7. (730) BREINL, A., and HINDLE, E. (1908). Morphology, etc., of Piroplasma canis. A.T.M.P., ii., p. 233. (731) BRUCE, D., HAMERTON, A. E., BATEMAN, H. R., and MACKIE, F. P. (1910). Amakebe : a Disease of Calves in Uganda. P. U.S. (B.), Ixxxii., p. 256. *(732) CHRISTOPHERS, S. R. (1907). P. canis and its Life-Cycle in the Tick. S.M.I., 29. (733) DSCHUNKOWSKY, E., and LUHS, J. (1909). Protozoenkrankheiten des Blutes des Haustiere in Tranakaukasien. Ber. IX. Int. Tierarztl. Kongr. Haag. BIBLIOGRAPHY 499 (734) DSCHTJNKOWSKY, E., and LTTHS, J. (1909). Entwickelungsformen von Piroplasmen in Zecken. Ibid. (735) FANTHAM, H. B. (1907). The Chromatin-Masses of P. bigeminum (Babeaia bovia. Q.J.M.S., li., p. 297. (736) FKANOA, C. (1910). La Classification des Piroplasmes et Description de deux Formes. A.I.C.P., iii., p. 11. (737) GONDER, R. (1906). Achromaticua veaperuginia. A.K.G.A., xxiv., p. 220. (738) _ (1910). Die Entwicklung von TheUeria parva. A.P.K., xxi., p. 143. (739) — (1911). Th. parva und Babeaia mutans Kiistenfieberparasit and Pseudo- kiistcnfieberparasit. Ibid., p. 222. (740) — (1911). Die Entwicklung von Th. parva. II. A.P.K., xxii., p. 170. (741) KINOSHITA, K. (1907). Babeaia cania. A.P.K., viii., p. 294. (742) KLEINE, F. K. (1906). Kultivierungsversuch der Hundepiroplasmen. Z.H., liv., p. 10. (743) KOCH, R. (1906). Entwicklungsgeschichte der Piroplasmen. Ibid., p. 1. (744) MAYER, M. (1910). Das ostafrikanische Kiistenfieber der Rinder. A.S.T.H. xiv., Beiheft 7, p. 307. (745) NEUMANN, R. 0. (1910). Die Blutparasiten von Veaperugo. A.P.K., xviii., p. 1. (746) NICOLLE, C. (1907). Une Piroplasmose nouvelle d'un Rongeur. C.R.8.B., Ixiii., p. 213. (747) NUTTALL, G. H. F., and FANTHAM, H.B. (1910). TheUeria parva. Py., iii., p. 117. *(748) — and GRAHAM-SMITH, G. S. (1906, 1907). Canine Piroplasmosis V. and VI. J.H., vi., p. 585 ; vii., p. 232. (749) • (1908). Multiplication of Piroplaama bovia, P. pitheci in the circu- lating Blood compared with that of P. cania. Py., i., p. 134. (750) (1908). Development of P. cania in Cultures. Ibid., p. 243. (751) SMITH, T., and KILBORNB, F. L. (1893). Southern Cattle Fever. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Eighth and Ninth Reports Bureau Animal Industry, 1891, 1892, p. 77. (752) THEILEK, A. (1910). Texasfieber, Rotwasser und Gallenkrankheit der Rinder. Zeitschr. f. Infektionakrankheiten der Hauatiere, viii., p. 39. (753) YAKIMOHT, W. L., STOLNIKOFF, W. J., and KOHL-YAKMOFF, N. (1911). L. Achromaticus vesperuginua. A.P.K., xxiv., p. 60. (g) Incertse Sedis. (754) NICOLLE, C., and MANCEATTX, L. (1909). Un Protozoaire nouveau du Gondi. C.R.A.8., cxlviii., p. 369. (755) PATELLA, V. (1910). Corps de Kurloff-Demel dans quelques Mononucleaires du Sang des Cobayes. La Genese Endotheliale dee Leucocytes Mono- nucleaires du Sang (Siena, Imprimerie St. Bernardin), p. 211. (756) SEIDELIN, H. (1911). Protozoon-like Bodies in Yellow-Fever Patients. Journ. Pathol. Bacteriol., xv., p. 282. (757) — (1911). Etiology of Yellow Fever. Yellow Fever Bureau Bulletin, i., p. 229. CHAPTER XVI SPOROZOA— NEOSPORIDIA A. CNIDOSPORIDIA (a) General Works. *(758) AUERBACH, M. (1910). Die Cnidosporidien. Leipzig : Werner Klinkhardt. (b) Myxosporidia. (759) AWERINZEW, S. (1909). Die Sporenbildung bei Ceratomyxa drepanopsettce. A.P.K., xiv., p. 72. (760) — (1911). Sporenbildung bei Myxidium sp. aus der Gallenblase von Gottua scorpiua. A.P.K., xxiii., p. 199. (761) CHATTON, E. (1911). Paramyxa paradoxa. C.R A.S., clii., p. 631. (762) DOFLEIN, F. (1898). Myxosporidien. Zool. Jahrbucher (Abth. /. Anat. u. Ontog.), xi., p. 281. 500 THE PROTOZOA (783) KEYSSELTTZ, G. (1908). Die Entwioklung von Myxobolus pfeifferi, I. and II. A.P.K., »., p. 262. (764) LEOER, L., and HESSE, E. (1906). La Paroi sporale des Myxosporidies. C.R.A.8., oxlii., p. 720. (765) (1907). Coccomyxa morovi. C.R.A.8., ozlv., p. 85. (765*5) MERCIER, L. (1910) La sexualite ohez les Myzosporidies et chez les Microsporidies. Acad. Roy. Bdgique, Mim. 810. (2), ii., No. 6. (766) PLEHN, M. (1904). Die Drehkrankheit der Salmoniden (Lentospora cere- bralis). A.P.K., v., p. 145. (767) SCHBODBB, O. (1907). Entwicklungsgeschichte der Myxosporidien. Sphceromypa labrazesi (sdbrazesi). A.P.K., ix., p. 359. (768) — (1910). Die Anlage der Sporooyste (Pansporoblasten) bei Sphceromyxa sabrazesi. A.P.K., xix., p. 1. (o) Actinomyxidia. (769) CAOTJJIBY, M., and MESNIL, F. (1905). Sphceractinomyxon stolci. A.P.K., vi.. p. 272. (d) Microsporidia. (770) AWEEINZEW, 8., and FERMOB, K. (1911). Die Sporenbildung bei Glugea anomala. A.P.K., xxiii., p. 1. (771) CHATTON, E., and KREMPF, A. (1911). Les Protistes du genre 'Octosporea. B.8.Z.F., xxxvi., p. 178. (772) HESSE, E. (1904). Le D^veloppement de Thelohania legeri. C.R.S.B., Ivii., p. 571. (773) _ (1905). Myxocystis mrazeki. C.R.8.B., Iviii., p. 12. (774) LBOEB, L., and DUBOSCQ, 0. (1909). Perezia lankesterice. A.Z.E. (5), i., Notes et Revue, p. Ixxix. (775) — and HESSE, E. (1910). Cnidosporidies des Larves d'Ephdmeres. C.R.A.S., cl., p. 411. (776) MEBOIEB, L. (1908). Neoplasie du Tissu Adipeux chez les Blattes Parasitces par une Microsporidie. A.P.K., xi., p. 372. (777) MBAZEK, A. (1910). Auffassung der Myxooystiden. A.P.K., xviii., p. 245. (778) PEREZ, C. (1904). Une Microsporidie parasite du Carcinus mcenas. C.R.8.B., Ivii., p. 214. (779) — (1905). Microsporidies 'Parasites des Crabes d'Arcachon. Butt. Stat. Bid. Arcachon, viii. (780) — (1908). Duboscqia legeri. C.R.8.B., Ixv., p. 631. (781) SCHBODEB, O. (1909). Thelohania chcetogastrw. A.P.K., xiv., p. 119. (782) SCHXTBEBG, A. (1910). Microsporidien aus dem Hoden der Barbe. A.K.Q.A., xxxiii., p. 401. (783) SHIWAGO, P. (1909). Vermehrung bei Pleistophora periplanetce. Z.A., xxxiv., p. 647. (784) STEMPELL, W. (1904). Nosema anomalum. A.P.K., iv., p. 1. (785) — (1909). Nosema bombycis. A.P.K., xvi., p. 281. (786) — (1910). Morphologic der Miorosporidien. Z.A., xxxv., p. 801. (787) WBISSENBEBO, B. (1911). Einige Mikrosporidien aus Pisohen (Nosema lophii, Qlugea anomala, 01. Hertwigii). 8.B.O.B., p. 344. (787-5) WOODCOCK, H.M. (1904). On Myxosporidia in Flatfish. Trans. Liverpool Bid. Soc., xviii., p. 126. (e) Sarcosporidia. See also NOB. 18, 25, and 26. (788) BETEGH, L. v. (1909). Entwicklungsgange der Sarcosporidien. C.B.B.P.K. (I Abth. Orig.), lii., p. 566. (788-5) CBAWLEY, H. (1911). Sarcocystis rileyif Proc. Acad. Philadelphia, 1911, p. 457. (789) DABLING, S. T. (1910). Experimental Sarcosporidiosis in the Guinea-Pig. J.E.M., xii., p. 19. (790) EBDMANN, E. (1910). Kern und metacbiomatische Korper bei Sarko- sporidien. A.P.K., xx., p. 239. (791) — (1910). Sarcocyetis muris in der MuskuJa-tur. 8.B.O.B., p. 377. (792) FIEBIGEB, J. (1910). Sarkosporidien. Vvh. Zool.-Bot. Oes. Wien, Ix., p. (73). BIBLIOGRAPHY 501 (793) LAVERAN, A., aad MESNIL, F. (1899). La Morphologic des Sarcosporidies. O.R.8.B., II, p. 245. (794) NEGRE. L. (1910). Le Stade intestinal de la Sarcosporidie de la Souris. C.R.8.B., Ixviii., p. 997. (795) NEGRI, A. '1908, 1910). Ueber Sarkosporidien, I. and II. C.B.B.P.K. (I Abth. Orig.), xlvii.. pp. 56 and 612 ; III., Ibid., lv., p. 373. (797) TEICHMANN, E. (1911). Die Teilungen der Keime in dev Cyste von Sarco- cystis tenetta. A.P.K., xxii., p. 239. (798) VUILLEMIN, P. (1902). Sarcocystis tenetta. C.R.A.8., cxxxiv., p. 1152. (799) WATSON, E. A. (1909). Sarcosporidiosis : Its Association with Loco- Disease, etc. Journ. Comp. Pathol. Therapeut., xxii., p. 1. B. HAPLOSPORIDIA. (800) BEATTIE, J. M. (1906). Rhinosporidium kinealyi. Journ. Pathol. Bacterial., xi., p. 270. (801) CATJLLERY, M., and CHAPPBLLIER, A. (1906). Anurosporidium pelseneeri. G.R.8.B., lx., p. 325. (802) — and MESNIL, F. (1905). Les Haplosporidies. A.Z.E. (4), iv., p. 101. (803) CHATTON, E. (1907). Cautterya mesnili. O.R.S.B., Ixii., p. 529. (804) — (1908). Blastulidium pcBdophthorum. G.R.8.B., Ixiv., p. 34. (805) CRAWLEY, H. (1905). Ocdosporidium Uatettce. Proc. Acad. Philadelphia, Ivii., p. 158. (806) KING, H. D. (1907). fertramia lufonis. Ibid., lix., p. 273. (807) LAVERAN, A., and PETTIT, A. (1910). Une Epizootie des Truites. G.R.A.S., oli., p. 421. (808) MINCHIN, E. A., and FANTHAM, H. B. (1905). Rhinosporidium kinealyi. Q.J.M.8., xlix., p. 521. (809) RIDEWOOD, W. G., and FANTHAM, H. B. (1907). Neurosporidium cephalo- disci. Q.J.M.8., Ii.. p. 81. (810) ROBERTSON, M.*(1908). A Haplosporidian of the Genus Ichthyosporidium. Proc. R. Phys. Soc. Edinburgh, xvii., p. 175. (811) — (1909). An Ichthyosporidiau causing Disease in Sea-Trout. P.Z.S., 1909, p. 399. (812) STEMPELL, W. (1903). Die Gattung Polycaryum. A.P.K., ii., p. 349. (813) WARREN, E. (1906). Bertramia kirkmanni. Ann. Natal. Oovt. Mus., i., p. 7, (814) WRIGHT, J. (1907). Rhinosporidium kinealyi. New York Med. Journ., December 21. C. INCBRT^B SEDIS. (815) AWERINZEW, S. (1908). Lymphocyslis johnjtonei. A.P.K., xiv., p. 335. (816) — (1911). Die Entwicklungsgeschichte von Lymphocystia johnstonei. A.P.K., xxii., p. 179. (817) CHATTON, E. (1906). La Biologie, etc., des Amabidium. A.Z.E. (4), v., Notes et Revue, p. xvii. (818) — (1907). Pans.poretta perplexa. G.R.S.B., Ixii.. p. 42. (819) — (1910). Gastrocysti* gilruthi. A.Z.E. (5), v., Notes et Revue, p. cxiv. (820) GILRTTTH, J. A. (1910). Oastrocystis gilruthi. Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria (n.s.), xxiii., p. 19. (821) GRANATA, L. (1908). Capillus intestinalis. Biologica, ii., p. 1. (822) KRASSILSTSCHTK, J. M. (1909). Neue Sporozoen bei Insekten. A.P.K., xiv., p. 1. (823) LEGBR, L., and DUBOSCQ. O (1909). Les Chytridiopsis. A.Z.E. (5), i. Notes et Revue, p. ix. (824) WOODCOCK, H. M. (1904). Lymphocystia johnatonei. Trans. Biol. Soc. Liverpool, xviii p. 143. 602 THE PROTOZOA CHAPTER XVII INFUSORIA (a) General Works. (825) HABTOG, M. (1910). Infusoria. Encydop. Brit., eleventh edition, ziv., p. 657. *(826) HICKSON, S. (1903). The Infusoria. A Treatise on Zoology (Lankester) (London : A. and C. Black), p. 361. (b) Ciliata. See also, Nos. 16, 32, 33, 38'5, 44, 50, 53, 73, 93, 96, 102, 104, 106-109, 111-113- 115, 121, 122, 124-126, 136-143, 148, 149. 155, 162, 165-167, 170-173, 177, 181-183, 197-199, 201, 205, 206, 208, 209, 211, 214-220, and 346. (827) BBATJCHAMP, P. DB, and COLLIK, B. (1910). Sur Hastatdla radians. A.Z.E. (5), v., Notes et Revue, p. xxviii. (828) BUSCHKIEL, A. L. (1911). Ichthyophthirius multifiliis. A.P.K., xxi., p. 61. (829) CATJIXBBY, M., and MESNIL, F. (1903). La Structure nucleaire d'un Infu- soire Parasite des Actinies (Foettingeria actiniarum), C.R.8.B., lv., p. 806. (830) (1907). L'Appareil nucleaire d'un Infusoire (Ehizocaryum concavum). C.R.Asa. Franc. Reims. (831) CBPEDE, C. (1910). Les Infuspires astomes. A.Z.E. (5), iii., p. 341. (831*5) CHATTON, E. (1911). Perikaryon cesticota and Conchophrys davidoffi. A.Z.E. (5), viii., Notes et Revue, p. viii. (832) COLUN, B. (1909). Deux Formes nouvelles d'lnfusoires Disco triches. A.Z.E. (5), ii. Notes et Revue, p. xxi. (833) DOBELL, C. C. (1909). Infusoria parasitic in Cephalopoda. Q.J.M.S., liii., p. 183. (834) FAURE"-FREMIET, E. (1905). L'Appareil fixateur chez les VorticettidcB. A.P.K., vi., p. 207. (835) — (1907). Mitochondries et Spheroplastes chez les Infusoires cilies. C.R.8.B., Ixii., p. 523. (836) — (1908). Tintinnidium inquilinum. A.P.K., xi., p. 225. (837) — (1908). L'Ancystropodium maupasi. A.P.K., xiii., p. 121. (838) — (1909). Le Macronucleus des Infusoires ciliea. B.8.Z.F., xxxiv., p. 55. (839) — (1910). Le Mycterothrix tuamotuensis. A.P.K., xx., p. 223. (840) GONDER, R. (i905). Kernverhaltnisse bei den in Cephalopoden schmarot- zenden Infusorien. A.P.K., v., p. 240. (841) HAMBURGER, C. (1903). Trachdius ovum. A.P.K., ii., p. 445. (842) — (1904). Die Konjugation von Paramcecium buraaria. A.P.K.,iv.,p.lQ9. (843) — and BTTDDENBROCK, v. (1911). Nordische Ciliata mit Ausschluss der Tintinnoidea. Brandt and Apstein, Nordisches Plankton. (844) JOSEPH (1907). Kernverhaltnisse von Loxodes rostrum. A.P.K., viii., p. 344. (845) KASANZEFF, W. (1910). Loxodes rostrum. A.P.K., xx., p. 79. (846) KIEBNIK, E. (1909). 'Chilodon hexastichus. B.A.8.C., p. 75. (847) KOFOID, C. A. (1903). Protophrya ovicola. Mark Anniversary Volume, p. 111. (848) LEGER, L.( and DUBOSCQ, 0. (1904). Les Astomata representent-ils un Groupe naturel ? A.Z.E. (4), ii., Notes et Revue, p. xcviii. (849) (1904). Les Infusoires endoparasites. A.Z.E. (4), ii., p. 337. (850) MARTINI (1910). Uber einen bei amobeuruhrahnlichen Dysenterien vor- kommenden Ciliatcn. Z.H., Ixvii., p. 387. (851) MAST, S. 0. (1909). The Reactions of Didinium uasutum. B.B., xvi., p. 91. (851-5) MATIPAS, E. (1888). La Multiplication des Infusoires oilies. A.Z.E. (2), vi., p. 165. (862) METCALF, M. M. (1907). Excretory Organs of Opalina. A.P.K., x., pp. 183. 365. (853) — (1909). Opalina : Its Anatomy, etc. A.P.R., xiii., p. 195. (854) MEUNIER, A. (1910). Microplankton des Mers de Barents et de Kara. Duo d'Orleans, Campagne Antique de 1907. Brussels. BIBLIOGRAPHY 503 (855) MrrRorHAKOW, P. (1905). La Structure, etc., des Trichooystes des Para- meeies. A.P.K., v., p. 78. (856) NEEBSHEIMER, E. R. (1903). Die Hohe histologischer Differenzierung bei heterotrichen Ciliaten. A.P.K., ii., p. 305. (857) NERESHEIMER, E. (1907). Die Fortpflanzung der Opalinen. A.P.K., Suppl. i., p. 1. (858) — (1908). Fortpflanzung ernes parasitischen Infusors (Ichthyophthirius), S.B.Q.M.P., xxiii. (859) PROWAZEK, S. v. (1904). Der Encystierungvorgaiig bei DUeptus. A.P.K., iii., p. 64. (860) — (1909). Conjugation von Lionotus. Z.A., xxxiv., p. 626. (861) — (1909). FormdimorpbJsmus tei Ciliaten Infusorien. M.I.O.C., i., p. 105. (862) Rotrx, J. (1899). Quelques Infusoires cilies des Environs de Geneve. Rev. Suwse Zool., vi., p. 557. (863) SCHEWIAKOFF, W. (1893). Die geographische Verbreitung der Susswasser- Protozoen. Mem. Acod. Imp. St.-Peterabourg (vii.), xli. (864) SCHRODER, OJ (1906),. Campanetta umbettaria. A.P.K., vii., p. 76. (865) — (1906). Epietylis plicatUis. Ibid., p. 173. (866) — (1906). Vorticetta monilata. Ibid., p. 395. (867) *— (1906). Stentor coeruleus und St. rosselii. A.P.K., viii., p. 1. (868) SCHUBOTZ, H. (1908). Pycnothrix monocystoides. Denkschr. Ges. Jena, xiii., p. 1. (869) SCHWEYER, A. (1909). Tintinnodeenweichkorper, etc. A.P.K., xviii., p. 134. (870) SIEDLECKI, M. (1902). UHerpetophrya astoma. B.A.S.C., p. 356. (871) STEIN, F. v. (1859, 1867). Der Organismus der Infusiontbiere : I. Hypo- trioha ; II. Heterotricha. Leipzig : W. Engelmann. (872) STEVENS, N. M. (1904). On Licnophora and Boveria. A.P.K., iii., p. 1. (873) THON, K. (1905). Bau von Didinium nasutum. A.P.K., v., p. 281. (874) WALKER, E. L. (1909). Sporulation in the Parasitic Ciliata. A.P.K., xvii., p. 297. (c) Acinetaria. (875) AWERINZEW, S. (1904). Astrophrya arenaria. Z.A., xxvii., p. 425. (876) CHATTON, E., and COLLIN, B. (1910). Un Acinetien commensal d'un Copepode, Rhabdophrya trimorpha. A.Z.E. (5), v., Notes et Revue, p. cxxxviii. (877) COLLIN, B. (1907). Sur quelques Acinetiens. A.Z.E. (4), vii., Notes et Revue, p. xciii. (878) — (1908). Sur Tokaphrya cy'dopum. A.Z.E. (4), viii., Notes et Revue, p. xxxiii. (879) — (1909). La Conjugaison, gemmiforme chez les Acinetiens. G.R.A.8., cxlviii., p. 1416. (880) — (1909). Les Formes hypertrophiques et la Croissance degenerative chez queiques Acinetiens. C.R.A.S., cxlix., p. 742. (881) — (1909). Sur deux Acinetiens. Ibid.; p. 1407. (882) — (1909). La Symetrie, etc., des Embryons d' Acinetiens. A.Z.E. (5), ii., Notes et Revue, p. xxxiv. (883) FILIPJEV, J. (1910). Tocophrya quadripartite. A.P.K., xxi., p. 117. (884) HARTOO, M. (1902). Notes on Suctoria. A.P.K., i., p. 372. (885) HICKSON, S. J., and WADSWORTH, J. T. (1902). Dendrocometes paradoxus. Q.J.M.8., xlv., p. 325. (886) (1909). Dendrosoma radians. Q.J.M.S., liv., p. 141. (887) ISHIKAWA, C. (1897). Eine in Misaki vorkommende Art von Ephdota. Journ. Cott. Sci. Tokyo, x., p. 119. (888) MARTIN, C. H. (1909). On Acinetaria. Parts I. and II. Q.J.M.S., liii., p. 351. Part III. Ibid., p. 629. (889) PEREZ, C. (1903). Lernceophrya capitata. C.R.8.B., lv., p. 98. 504 THE PROTOZOA CHAPTER XVIII (a) Classification. (890) AWERINZEW, S. (1910). Die Stellung im System und die Klassifizierung der Protozoen. E.G., xxx., p. 465. (891) DOFLEIN, F. (1902). Das System der Protozoen. A.P.K., i., p. 169. (892) HARTMANN, M. (1911). Das System der Protozoen. Vide Prowazek (14), p. 41 ; and No. 675. (b) Spirochaetes. *(893) BOSANQUET, W. C. (1911). Spirochsetes. Philadelphia and London : W. B. Saunders Company. (894) — (1911). Sp. anodontce Keysselitz. Q.J.M.S., Ivi., p. 387. (895) DOBELL, C. C. (1911). On Cristispira veneris and the Classification of Spiro- chaetes Q.J.M.S., Ivi., p. 507. (896) FANTHAM. H. B. (1911). Life-Cycle of Spirochastes. A.T.M.P., v., p. 479. (897) GROSS, J. (1910). Cristispira nov. gen. Mitt. zool. Stat. Neapd, xx., p. 41. (898) — (1911) Freilebende Spironemaceen. Ibid., p. 188. (899) — (1911). Nomenclatur der Sp. paUida. A.P.K., xxiv., p. 109. (900) HINDLE, E. (1912). Life-Cycle of Sp. gallinarvm. Py., iv., p. 463. (901) KRZYSZTALOWICZ, F., and 'SIEDLECKI, M. (1905). La Structure, etc., de Sp.pallida. B.A.S.C., p. 713. (902) LEISHMAN, W. B. (1910). Mechanism of Infection in Tick Fever and Heredi- tary Transmission of Sp. duttoni in the Tick. Trans. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., iii., p. 77. (903) SCHAUDINN, F. (1905). 8p. pallida. Deutsch. Med. Wochenschr., xxxi., p. 1665. (904) ZTTELZER, M. (1911). Sp. plicatilis. A.P.K., xxiv., p. 1. (c) Chlamydozoa. (906) ACTON, H. W., and HARVEY, W. F. (1911). Negri Bodies. Py., iv., p. 255. (907) AWERINZEW, S. (1910). Die Krebsgeschwulste. G.B.R.P.K., Ivi. (I Abth. Orig.), p. 506. (908) CALKINS, G. N. (1904). Cytoryctes variolas, Guarnieri. Journ. Med. Research (Special Variola Number), xi., p. 136. (909) HARTMANN, M. (1910). Chlamydozoen. C.B.B.P.K. (I Abth. Ref.), xlvii., Beiheft, p. 94. (910) NEGRI, A. (1909). Die Morphologic und der Entwicklungszyklus des Para- siten der Tollwut. Z.H., etc., Ixiii., p. 421. (911) PROWAZEK, S. v. (1907). Chlamydozoa. A.P.K., x., p. 336. (912) — and ARAGAO, H. DE B. (1909). Variola-Untersuchungen. M.I.O.O., i., p. 147. (913) — LiPSCHtiTZ, B., and Others (1911). Chlamydozoa, etc. Vide Prowazek (14). (914) SIEGEL, J. (1905). Die Atiologie der Pocken und der Maul- und Klauen- seuche : des Scharlachs : der Syphilis. Abhandl. k. preuss Akad. Wiss. (An hang.) INDEX TO TECHNICAL TERMS AND ZOOLOGICAL NAMES The numerals printed in hoaviefi black type refer to pages on which the meaning of the word or the systematic position of a genus, family, or order are fully explained. AOANTHARIA, 251, 256 Acanthin, 37, 258 Acanthocystis, 37, 48, 91, 245, 248 — aculeata, 117, 118 (Fig. 64), 123 (Fig. 68) — chcetophora, 37 (Fig. 18) Acanthometra, 256 — elastuta, 250 (Fig. 105) — pellucida, 255 AcanthometridcB, 37 Aoephalina, 330 Achromaticus, 364, 382 — vesperuginis, 382 Achromat in, 65 Acineta, 461 — grandis, 11 (Fig. 10) — papillifera, 16 Acinetaria, 430, 455 Acinetidw, 461 Acrasiee, 243 Acrasis, 243 Actinobolus radians, 441 ActinocephalidcB, 339 Actinocephalusoligacanthus, 327 (Fig. 142) Actinomma aster acanthion, 254 (Fig. 107) Aotinomyxidia, 409 Actinophrys, 117, 215, 245, 248 — sol, 90 (Fig. 46), 132 (Fig. 71), 151 Aotinopoda, 218 AclinosphcBrium, 43, 50 (Fig. 22), 68, 74, 77, 78, 80, 91, 138, 144, 150, 193, 198, 207, 209, 214, 216, 245, 248 — eichhorni, 7 (Fig. 3), 81 (Fig. 37), 115 (Fig. 62), 116 (Fig. 63) Adaptive polymorphism, 164 Adelca, 175, 176, 348, 352, 393 — hartmanni, 344, 347, 348 — ovata, 344, 345 (Fig. 153), 346, 347 (Fig. 154), 352 Adcleida), 352, 354, 355 Adeleidea, 352, 394 Adinida, 278 Adoral spiral, 442 Adult, 212 sEthalium, 242 Aflagellar, 287 Agametes, 180, 181 Agamogony, 181 Agamont, 181 Agglomeration, 128, 209, 305 Agglutination, 128 Agglutinin, 128 Aggregata, 23, 168, 325, 348, 353 — iacquemeti, 121 (Fig. 67) Aggregation, 353 Alcohol, effects of, 204 AUogromia, 230 — ovoidea, 235 Alternation of generations, 181 Alveolar layer, 435 Alveoli, 42 Amicronucleate, 211 Amitosis, 105 Amoeba, 219 — aOnda, 221 (Fig. 87) — Mnucleata, 78, 95, 214, 223 — diploidea, 222 (Fig. 88) — diplomitotica, 108, 109 (Fig. 56) — flava, 221 — Umax, 46, 47 (Fig. 20), 206, 217, 219 — minuta, 221, 223 — mucicola, 220 — proteus, 6 (Fig. 2), 47, 191, 205, 209, 215, 216, 217, 219, 220, 222, 230 — radiosa, 217, 219 — terricola, 48, 190 (Fig. 82), 214, 220 — verrucosa, 32, 45, 48, 50, 51 (Fig. 23), 198, 214, 219 — vespertilio, 217 Amoeba, form-changes, 216 (Fig. 85) Amcebsea, 217 Amcebidium, 428 Amoebodiastase, 193 Arnceboflagellata, 463 Amcebogeniffl, 325, 466 Amoeboid, 30 Amoebula, 169 Amphikaryon, 96 Amphileptus, 439 Amphimixis, 150, 154 Amphinucleus, 96 Amylum, 188 Anaerobic, 196 Anaplastna marginale, 383 Ancystropodium, 441 Angeiocystis audouinias, 349 Anisogamy, 126, 132, 175 Anisone.ma, 274 — grande, 53 (Fig. 25) AnisonemincB, 274 Anisospore, 215, 254 Annulus, 276 Anophelinse, 358 Anoplophrya, 171, 439, 443, 449, 452 — branchiarum (reduction), 145 (Fig. 74) AnoplophryincB, 197, 452 Anurosporidium, 424 Aphrothoraoa, 247 Apiosoma, 379 Apodinium, 278 505 506 THE PROTOZOA Aposporogony, 368 Arcella, 64, 65, 72, 78, 126, 148, 173, 199, 201, 215, 216,229 — vulgarit, 67 (Fig. 32), 110 (Fig. 57), 177, 178 (Fig. 80) Archeeocytes, 133 Arohoplasm, 79, 103 Arenaceous, 34, 231 Asporocystea, 388 Aspirigera, 439 Arrhenoplasm, 129 Artificial classification, 463 Assimilation, 187 Association, 127, 330 Astasia, 274 — tenax, 33 (Fig. 15) AstasiidcB, 274 Astomata, 438, 439, 451 Astrodisculus, 248 Astrophrya, 461 — arenaria, 456 Athene noctua, 390 Attraction-sphere, 103 Attraction-spindle, 104 Aulacantha, 256 Autocyst, 417 Autogamy, 138, 306 Automixis, 140 Autophya, 34 Avoiding reaction, 202 Axopodium, 48, 53, 60, 87, 199, 465 Axostyle, 36, 259, 289, 311 Azoosporidac, 218 Bdbesia, 357, 379, 394 — bovis (bigemina), 379, 384 — mutans, 380, 382 Babesioses, 378 Bacteria, 5, 98 liadhamia, 242 — utricularis, 240 (Fig. 99), 241 (Fig. 100) Balantidium, 439, 440 — coli, 440 — minwtum, 440 Banana-tree, 136 Barroussia, 352 — alpina, 344, 345 (Fig. 153) — caudata, 348 — ornata, 346, 352 — spiralis, 344, 348 Barotaxis, 202, 207 Basal granule, 82, 92, 200, 443 — rim, 443 Benedenia, 353 Bertramia, 424 — asperospora, 424 — bufonis, 424 — • capitellcB, 424 — kirkmanni, 424 BertramiidcB, 424 Bilateral symmetry, 31, 250 Biloculina depressa shells, 233 (Fig. 94) Binary fission, 100 Binuclearity, 96 Binuoleata, 85, 280, 388 Bioblast, 40, 41 BionomicB, 15 Black spores, 364 Blastocoele, 133 lilastndinidw, 278 Blastodinium, 278 Blastogenea, 418 Blastomore, 133 Blastulidium pcedophthorum, 424 Blepharoplast, 52, 59, 82, 262, 286, 288, 289 Bodo, 270, 281, 319 — edax, 319 — ffracilis, 271 (Fig. 115) — lacerta), 270 — adUans, 271 (Fig. 115), 319 /lodonidce, 268, 270 Body-form, 29 Bud, 122 Buelschlia, 439 Bursaria, 439 Bursaridce, 439 Callyntrochlamys phroninue, 327 Calonympha, 276 Calymma, 251,252 Calyx, 89 Campanula, 440, 446, 447 — umb'ellaria, 434 (Fig. 183) Camptonema, 51, 248 — nutans, 91 (Fig. 47) Cancer, 473 Capillitium, 241 Capillus intestinalis, 428 Capsulogenous cell, 399. 403 Carchesium, 145, 192, 194, 440, 44], 449 Caryoryctes, 473 Caryospora, 349, 352 — simplex, 352 Caryotropha, 195, 344, 348, 352 — mesnilii, 349, 352 Caryotrophidw, 352 Caullerya, 424 — mesnili, 424 Cell, 1, 98, 464 Cell-anus, 433 Cell-division, 121 Cell-membrane, 45 Cell-mouth, 63 Cell-theory, 135 Central capsule, 250 — grain, 91 — spindle, 103 Centriojfi. 73, 80, 97, 262 ( 'outrodQBmofie, 36, 58, 59, 82, 103 Centropyxis, 148V 173, 229 — aculeiUa, 36, 23.0 Controsome, 58, 59, 73, 79, 262, 288 Centrosphere, 80 Cephalina, 339 Cephaloidophora, 337 Cephalont, 181, 326 Ceratinmyxa, 242 Ceratium, 278 Ceralocoryy, 278 — horrida, 277 (Fig, 121) Ceratomyxa, 408 — drepanopsettw, 402 (Fig. 166), 403 — sphcerulosa, 409 Ceratomyxida}, 408 Ceratophyttiu faadatus, 291 Ccrcomonadida), 268, 270 Cercomonas, 270, 271 — crassicaitda, 271 (Fig. 114) Chagasia hartmanni, 344, 347 Chalaiothoraca, 248 Chemotaxis, 202 ChiliferidcB, 439 Chilodon, 145, 439, 448 INDEX 507 Chilodon cucullulus, 435 (Fig. 184) — dentatus, 440 Chilomonas, 208, 274 Chlamydodontido), 439 Ohlamydomonadidcn, 275 Chlamydomonas, 275 Chlamydomyxa, 214,243, 244 Chlamydophora, 248 Chlamydophrys, 237 — schaudinni, 237 — slercorea, 17, 237 Chlainydozoa, 470 CMoromyxida?, 407, 409 Chloromyxum, 409 — leydigi, 400 (Fig. 164), 409 Chlorophyll, 13, 63, 188, 261 Choanoflagellata, 261, 271 Choanoflagettidcf. 271 Chondriosomo, 41 Chromatin, 65, 69 Chromatoid grains, 67, 289, 311 Chromatophorc, 13, 63, 188, 261 Chromidia, 6, 65, 97, 150, 215, 328 Chroinidial fragmentation, 101 Chromidina, 452 Chromidiogamy, 126, 416 Chromidiosome, 65, 103 Chromomonadina, 274 Chromophyll, 188 Chromoplast, 13, 63 Chromosome, 103 Chromulina, 274 — flavicans, 15 Chrysamceba, 274 Chrysomonadina, 14, 274 Chytridiopsis, 428 — socius, 428 Ciliary apparatus, 442, 444 (Fig. 186) Ciliata, 430, 432 (Fig. 181) Cilioflagollata, 277 Ciliophora, 462 Ciliophrys, 248 Ciliospore, 169 Cilium, 12, 53, 92, 199, 200, 442, 454 Circumflucnoo, 189 Circumvallation, 189 Cirrus, 55, 445 Cladomonas, 270 Cladothrix pelomyxcB, 227 Classification, 462 Clathrulina, 39, 245, 248 — elegans, 38 (Fig. 19) Clepsydrina, 335, 339 Cnidosporidia, 399 Coccidia, 341, 389 Coccidiidm, 352 Coccidioides immilis, 17 Coocidiomorpha, 388, 395 Cocoidiosis, 343 Coccidium, 101, 166, 173, 174, 346, 352 — cuniculi, 341, 351 — mitrarium, 344 — oviforme, 341 — rouxi, 349 — schuberffi, 102 (Fig. 50), 106 (Figs. 51, 52), 127 (Fig. 69), 146 (Fig. 75), 204, 342 (Fig. 152), 353, 354 — stieda), 341 Coocoid bodies, 468 Coocolith, 274 CoccolithophoridcB, 274 Coccomyxa, 409 Cdccomyxa moron', 409 Cochlearia faurei, 442 Cochliopodium, 229 Codonosiga botrylis, 260 (Fig. 110. CcelosporidiidtB, 399, 424 Ccelosporidium, 424 — blateUm, 424 Ccelozoic, 324 Coleps, 439, 441 Collar, 57, 89, 261 Collecting-pusule, 277 Collodagia, 255 CoUozoum, 256 Colpidium, 208 Colpoda, 439 Conchophrys, 439 Conjugant, 126, 448 Conjugation, 126, 448 Conorhinus megistus, 291, 302 Contact-stimulus, 207 Contractile vaouole, 60, 196, 197, 262, 437,447 — system, 445, 446 Contractility, 200, 201 Copromonas. 171, 274 — major, 268 — subtilis, 264 (Fig. Ill), 268 Copromyxa, 243 Copularium, 355 Copulation, 126 Corps en barillet, 344 Cortex, 45 Cortical layer, 32 Corticate, 45 Costia, 258, 272 — necatrix, 16, 272 Cothurnia, 440 Craspedomonads, 261, 271 Craspedotella, 279 Cristispira, 466, 469 — anodontee, 468 — balbianii, 467 — prectinis, 469 (Fig. 194) Crithidia, 281, 282,-287, 308, 312, 320, 32,1 — campanulata, 313 — gerridis, 313 — melophagia, 290 — minuta, 312 (Fig. 135) Cryptocystes, 412 Cryptodifflugia, 229, 230 Cryptomonadina, 15, 274 Cryptomonas, 274 — schaudinni, 15 Cryptosporidium, 349, 352 — muris, 344, 352 Crystal-spores, 254 Cuirass, 33, 45, 276 Culicinse, 358 Culture d'attente, 304 Cuticle, 45 Cyclasterium, 470 Cyclical transmission, 290 CyclochcBta, 440, 441 Cycloposthium, 439 Cyclosis, 192, 194, 437 Cyclospora, 352 — caryolitica, 176, 198, 344, 348, 349, 352 Cyst, 154 Cystal residuum, 349 Cystobia chiridotae, 341 508 THE PROTOZOA Cystobia holothurics, 128 (Fig. 70) — irregularis, 331 — minchinii, 336 Cystoflagellata, 257, 278 Cystotrypanosoma, 304 Cytooyst, 344 Cytomere, 344 Cytomicrosome, 41 Cytopharynx, 63, 261, 433, 442 Cytoplasm, 6, 7, 99 Cytopyge, 433 Cytorhyctes, 471 — aphtharum, 471 — luis, 471 — scarlatina}, 471 — vacdnce, 471 Cytoryctes, 470, 471 Cytostome, 63, 190, 191, 261, 433, 452 Cytozoic, 324 . Dactylosoma splendens, 378 Dcfcecation, 233 Degeneration, 208 Dendrocometes, 457, 460, 461 DendrocometidcB, 461 Dendrosoma, 456, 458, 461 — radians, 78, 460 (Fig. 193) Dendrosomida), 461 Dendrosomides paguri, 455 Depression, 131, 135, 197, 208 Derbesia, 90 Desmothoraca, 248 Deutoblast, 426 Doutomerite, 327 Deutoplasmic, 41 Devescovina, 276 Dexiotricha, 440 Dictyostelium, 243 Didinium, 145, 439, 442, 449 Didymophyes, 330 Difflugia, 34, 35, 50, 65, 66, 78, 126, 140, 149, 199, 215, 216,229 — spiralis, 34 (Fig. 16) — urceolata, 214, 229, 230 Diffuse infiltration, 400 Digestion, 192 Dileptus, 439 Dimastigamceba, 268 Dimorpha, 249 — nutans, 249 (Fig. 104) Dinenympha, 276 Dir. iera, 278 Dindbryon, 274 Dinoflagellata, 257, 276 Dinophysida), 278 Dinophysis, 278 Diphtheria, 470 Diplocystis minor, 128 (Fig. 70) Diplodina, 174 Diplosome, 79 Diplozoa, 273 Direct division, 101 Direct transmission, 290 Discophrya, 439 Discorbina, 232 (Fig. 93, vii) Disporea, 408 Dizoio, 349 DoliocystidcB, 339 Dourine, 26, 285, 289 Drehkrankhoit, 400 Drepanidia, 395 Drepanidium, 372 Duboscyia, 418 — legeri, 418 Earth-amoebae, 220 Echinomera, 333 Echinopyxis, 101 Ectoplasm, 43, 45, 435 Eotosaro, 43 Eotoschiza, 339 Kctosporea, 325 Eimeria, 346, 352 — faJciformis, 3.46 — nepco, 346 Eimerido), 352 Eimoridoa, 352, 394 Electrical stimuli, effects of, 208 Elementary corpuscles, 472 Etteipsisoma, 387 — thomsoni, 387 Enchelida), 439 Enchyloma, 41, 72 Encystment, 164 Endogenous budding, 124 — cycle, 184 Endoparasita, 462 Endophrys rotatorium, 249 Endoplasm, 43, 62, 437 Endoral membrane, 445 Endosarc, 43 Endoschiza, 339 Endosomo, 73 Endospore, 335 Endosporese, 242, 825 Endotrypanum, 307 — schaudinni, 307 (Fig. 133) End-piece, 443 Enorgid, 121 Entamaba, 220 — africana, 226 — blatta), 47, 220, 223 — buccalis, 220 — coli, 18, 138 (Fig. 73), 139, 223, 224 (Fig. 89), 225 — histolytica, 18, 46, 223, 224, 225 (Fig. 90) — minuta, 226 — muris, 220 — ranarum, 220 — tetraocna, 226 — wttliamsi, 225 Entodinium, 439, 441 Entozoic, 16 Enzymes. See Ferments Ephelota, 457,461 — bu^schliana, 457 — gemmipara, 460 Epicyte, 45, 327 Epimerito, 45,326 Epispore, 335 Epistylis, 440, 441 — plicatilis, 444 (Fig. 186, K), 446 — umbellaria, 447 Epithelioma oontagiosum, 470 Epizoio, 16 Equating division, 104 Equatorial plate, 103 Ergastoplasm, 41 Erythropsis, 277 Etheogenesis, 138, 315 Eucocoidia, 352 Eucoccidium, 353 Eucyrlidium, 256 INDEX Eucyritidium cranioides, 256 (Fig. 109) Euflagellata, 257 Euglena, 14, 33, 52 (Fig. 24), 107, 202, 274 — gracttis, 188 — spirogyra, 8 (Fig. 4) — viridis, 188, 205 (Fig. 84) Euglenidce, 274 Euglenoid movement, 33 Euglenoidina, 273 Euglyvha, 34, 35, 214, 287 — alveolata, 111, 112 (Fig. 59), 113 (Fig. 60) Eugregarinoj, 328, 339 Euplasmodida, 242 Euplotes, 194, 440, 448 — harpa, 433 (Fig. 182) — patella, 433 (Fig. 182) Euplotidce, 440 Kutrypanosomc, 292 Ex-conjugant, 153 Excretion, 197 Excretory canals, 447 Exflagellation, 357, 362, 364, 365, 390 Exogenous cycle, 184 Eye-spot, 205 Falciform body, 324 Fat, 194 Fatty degeneration, 210 Feeding canals, 437 Female sex, 159 Ferments, 193, 194 Fertilization-spindle, 127, 348 Filoplasmodida, 243 Filose, 48 Fission, 100 Fixation, 441 Flagellar, 287 Flagellata, 82, 257 Flagellispore, 169 Flagellosis, 313 Flagellula, 169 Flagellum, 6, 51, 199, 200, 289, 454, 465 Fcettingeria, 439 Fcettingeriido), 439 Food-vacuole, 50, 62, 191, 194, 437 Foot-and-mouth disease, 470 Foraminifera, 217, 231 Form-production, 31 Frambo3sia, 467 FrondictUaria, 232 (Fig. 93, iv.) Frontonia, 439, 442 — leucas, 206, 447 (Fig. 187) Fulcra, 441 Fuligo, 242 — septica, 239 (Fig. 97) Galvanotaxis, 202, 208 Gamete, 125, 448 Gametid, 334 Gamotooyte, 126 Gamogony, 181 Gamont, 126, 181 Oanymedes, 330 Gas-vaouole, 64 Gastrocystis gilruthi, 427, 428 (Fig. 179) Gemmation, 122 Gemmula, 459 Generative ohromatin, 71 Geotaxis, 207 Gorm, 165 Germ-cells, 130 Gormen, 130 Germinative infection, 24 Glaucoma, 439 — colpidium, 197, 206 — scintillans, 445 Glenodinium, 278 — cincium, 277 (Fig. 120) Globidium, 387 — multiftdum, 387 Globigerina, 231, 232 (Fig. 93, vi. Gloss ina morsitans, 291 — palpalis, 291, 303, 304 Glugea, 412, 417,418 — anomala, 411, 415, 417 (Fig. 174), 41X — stephani, 412 Gonium, 276 — perforate, 275 (Fig. 119) Granellse, 238 Granellarium, 238 Gregarina, 174, 335, 339 — blattarum, 339 — munieri, 58 (Fig. 29) — ovata, 332, 333 (Fig. 146), 335, 339 — polymorpha, 9 (Fig. 7), 339 Grogarines, sporogony, 331 (Fig. 144) Gregariniform phases, 315 Gregarinoidoa, 326 Gregarinula, 169, 324 Gromia, 231 — oviformis, 49 (Fig. 21) Quarnieri's bodies, 470 Ourleya, 418 Gymnamrebffi, 219 Gymnoainida}, 278 Gymnodinium, 278 Gymnospore, 165 Gymnostomata, 439, 442 Gymnozoum, 439, 442 — viviparum, 439 HeemamoBbee, 357, 389 Hsematochrome, 188 Hmmatococcus, 188, 275, 379 — pluvialis, 111 (Fig. 58) Hccmatomonas, 308 Hcematopinus spinulosus, 291, 301 Harmocystidium, 358, 364 — diploglossi, 358, 365 — metschnikovi, 358 — simondi, 358, 365 — tropiduri, 365 Hceinofiagollates, 258, 280 Hcemogregarina, 372 — agamce, 373 — balfouri, 376 — bicapsulata, 372 — canis, 377 — funambvM, 377 — gerbiUi, 376, 377, 390 — jaculi, 876 — muris, 23, 376, 390 — musculi, 352, 377 — nicoricB, 373, 375 — peramelis, 376 — sebai, 377 — stepanowi, 107 (Fig. 53), 372, 373, 374 (Fig. 159), 375, 390 Heemogregarines, 357, 371, 390 HcBmogregarinido), 378 Hcemoproteus, 365, 391 — columba, 365, 366 (Fig. 157), 390, 391 610 THE PROTOZOA HcBmoproteus danilewskyi, 365 — noctuco, 365, 390 — oryzivorce, 368 Heemosporidia, 356 HaUphyaema, 35, 231 — tumanowiczii, 35 (Fig. 17) Halteria, 439 Halteridce, 439 Halteridia, 389, 391 HaUeridium, 357, 365, 391 Haplosporidia, 399, 423 Haplosporidiidce, 423, 424 Haplosporidium, 424 Hastatella radians, 441 Helcosoma tropicum, 393, 412 Heliozoa, 90, 218, 244 Hemiclepsis marginata, 291, 298, 303 Hemispeira asterice, 441 Henneguya, 409, 426 Hepatozoon, 372 — muris, 376 — pernidosum, 376 Hereditary transmission, 24, 290 Herpetomonas, 281, 282, 292, 313, 319, 320 — musccB-domesticco, 137, 138, 282 (Fig. 124), 315 Herpetophrya, 452 Heterokaryote, 449, 453 Heteromastigoto, 259 Heteronemince, 274 Helerophrys, 248 — fockei, 248 (Fig. 103) Heterotricha, 433 Hexactinomyxon, 409 Hexamitus, 258, 272 Histocytes, 130, 133 Histoplasma, 319 — capsulatum, 319 Histozoic, 324 Holomastigina, 270 Holomastigote, 259 Holophrya, 439 Holopbytic, 13, 187, 188, 261 Holotrioha, 439 Holotriohous larvse, 459 Holozoio, 8, 13, 187, 261 Homaxon, 39, 250 HoplUophrya, 452 House, 33, 45 Hyalosphmra gregarinicola, 341 Hyalosphenia, 34 — ouneata, 34 (Fig. 16) Hydrophobia, 470 Hymenostomata, 439, 442 Hypershromasy, 71 Hypnocyst, 166 Hypocoma, 460 — acinetarum, 460 HypocomidcB, 460 Hypothallus, 240 Hypotrioha, 433, 440 Hypotrichoue larvae, 459, 460 Ichthyophthiriasis, 450 Ichthyophthirius, 448, 453 — muUiflliis, 16, 21, 450, 451 Ichthyosporidium, 424 Idiochromatin, 71 Idiochromidia, 150 Immanoplasma, 388 — ncylKi, 388 Imperforate, 231 Import, 189 Incubation-period, 292, 361 Incurvation, 468 Indirect division, 101 — transmission, 290 Infusoria, 2, 12, 152 (Fig. 77), 153, 430 Ingestion, 204 Initial body, 472 Intestinal flagellates, 258 Invagination, 189 Involution stages, 296 Isogamy, 126, 175 Isomastigote, 259 Isospore, 215, 254 Isotricha, 439 iKotrichidce, 439 Jcenia, 276 Kala-azar, 316 Kalpidorhynchus, 332 Karyogamy, 126 Karyokinesis, 101, 119 Karyolysus, 372 — lacertarum, 372, 378. Karyosome, 76, 288 Kataphorio action, 208 Kentrochona, 440 Kentrochonopsis, 440 Kinetonucleus, 78, 85, 200, 286, 288, 289 392 Klossia, 348, 352 — helicina, 352 Klosftielln, 352 — muris, 352 Kurloff-Demel bodies, 388 Labyrinthula, 243, 244 Labyrinthulidea, 243 Lagena, 232 (Fig. 93, ii.> Lagenophryince, 440 Lagenophrys, 440 Lamblia, 272 — intestinalis, 31, 272, 273 (Fig. 117) — sanguinis, 272 Lankesterella, 189, 372, 378 — ranarum, 372, 378 Lankesteria ascidice, 327, 329 (Fig. 143) — culicis, 327 Latent bodies, 296 Laverania, 358 Legendrea loyaxe, 441 Legerella, 348, 349, 352, 355, 388 — nova, 352 Legerellidae, 352 Legeria, 353 Legerina, 353 Leishmania, 258, 281, 316,. 320, 321» 393, 394 — d&nwani, 316 (Fig. 138), 317 (Fig. 139), 473 — infantum, 316, 317 — tropica, 87, 316, 317, 318 (Fig. 140), 412, 473 Lentospora cerebralia, 400 Leptodiscus, 279 Leptomonos, 52, 281, 282, 892, 308, 313, 319, 320, 321 — butschlii, 282 — joculum, 314 (Fig. 136), 315 Leplotheca, 408 INDEX 511 Ltptotoeca agilis, 201, 401 (Fig 165) — ranarum, 408 Leptotrypanosome, 292, 314 LerncBOphrya, 461 Lethal, 19 Leucocytogregarina, 372 Leucocytozoa, 372 Leucocytozovn, 357, 369, 390, 392 — iovati, 370 — muris, 376 — piroplasmoides, 319 — ratti, 376 — sabrazesi, 371 — sdemanni, 369 (Fig. 158), 370, 371 Leucophryn, 439 — patula, 440 Leucoplasts, 188 Leydenia gemmipara, 237 Licnophora, 440, 441, 446, 449 lAcnophoridce, 440 Life-cycle, 129, 130 Light-perception, 201 Light-production, 201 Linolla\ 238 Linin, 72 Lionotus, 439 Lithodrcus, 256 — producttu, 252 (Fig. 106) LUhocystis Schneider i, 331 Lobopodia, 47, 199 Lobosa, 217, 219 — testacoa, 229 Loboee, 47 LophomonadidtB, 276 Lophomonas, 36, 88, 261, 276 — Uattarum, 17, 18, 89 (Fig. 45), 263, 276 — atriata, 276 Lophophora, 276 Lorica, 33, 45, 276, 441 Loxoct.ee, 439, 448 Luminosity, 201 Lymphocystis, 426 — iohnstonei, 426, 427 (Fig. 178) Lymphocytozoon, 388 — cobayoB, 388 Lynchia, 365 Macramceba, 148 Macroconjugant, 153, 449 Macrogamete, 126 Maorogamy, 131, 161, 172 Maerogonidiee, 267 Maoromerozoite, 373 Macront, 426 Macronucleus, 78, 107, 430, 437, 448, 458 Maorosohizogony, 344 Macroschizoiit, 344, 373 Macrospores, 254, 255, 416 Macrostoma, 272 — 'mesnili, 272 Mai de oaderas, 285 Malaria, 358, 359 Male sex, 159 Mallory's bodies, 470 Malpighiella refringens, 229 Mantle-fibres, 103 MastigcBtnceba, 213, 261, 268 Mastigella, 77, 268 — mtrea, 83 (Fig. 40), 265, 266 (Fig. 112) Mastiffina, 265, 267, 268 — setosa, 82 (Figs. 38, 39) Mastigophora, 12, 257 Mastigotrioha, 455 Maturation, 142 Maupnsia, 454 — paradoxa, 454 (Fig. 189, B) Measles, 470 Mechanical stimuli, effects of, 207 Mechanical transmission, 290 Megaloephaerio, 184, 233 Megastirma, 272 — entericum, 272, 273 (Fig. 117) Melanin, 64, 198. 357 Membrane (nuclear), 76 Membranellae, 55, 443, 445 Membranulte, 445 Merocystis, 352 — kathce, 352 Merogregarina amaroutii, 336 Merogregarinida, 341 / Meront, 398, 413 Merozoite, 169, 325 Merozoon, 210 Mesomitosis, 111 Metabolic, 33 Metaohromatinio grains, 67, 420, 421 Meiacineta, 460 Metacindidce, 460 Metagenesis, 266 Metamera, 332. 339 Motamitosis, 111 Metaplastio, 40, 63 Metazoa, 2 Micramneba, 148 Microoonjugant, 153, 172, 448 Microgamete, 126, 448 Miorogamy, 132, 172 Miorogonidia, 267 Microklosffia, 426 Micromerozoite, 373 Mioront, 426 Micronuoleus, 78, 113, 114 (Fig. 61), 288. 332, 333, 430, 437. 448 Mioroschizont, 344, 873 Miorosome, 40 Miorbspherio, 184, 233 Microstore, 254, 255, 416 Miorosporidia, 411 Microthoracidm, 489 Micrathorax, 439 Miesoher's tubes, 419, 422 Minchmia, 352 — caudata, 348 — chit&rtis, 349, 352 Mitochondria, 41, 448 Mitosis, 101 Mixotrophic, 188 Mollusoum contagiosum, 17, 470 Monad, 466 MonadidcB, 270 Monas, 270 Monaxon, 39, 250 Monera, 78 Moniliform, 77 Monocercomonas, 272 Monocystis, 23, 174 (Fig. 79), 328, 336, 339 — coronate, 328 — pareudrili, 331 — rostrata, 332, 333, 335 Monokaryon, 121, 255 Monomastigoto, 259 Monomastix, 455 512 THE PROTOZOA Monomasiix ciliatus, 454 (Fig. 189, A), 455 Monomorphic bpeciofl, 163 Monopylaria, 251, 256 Monospora, 339 Monosporea, 409 Monothalamous, 36, 232 Monozoa, 273 Monozoio, 349 Mother-cyst, 138 Movement, 199 Movements of grogarinos, 327 MuUitilia, 249, 261, 270, 454 — lacustris, 269 (Fig. 113), 270 — polustris, 269 (Fig. 113), 270 Multiple fission, 100, 120 — gemmation, 122 — promitosis, 120 Multiplicative phase, 20, 166 Multipolar mitosis, 120 Murrina, 285 Mycetosporidium, 243 Mycetozoa, 218, 239, 268 Mycterothrix, 446 Myocyte, 327 Myonemes, 57, 201, 253, 259, 286, 445 Myophiisks, 253 Myxamceba, 239 MyxidiidcB, 409 Myxidium, 409 — bergense, 407 — lieberlffuhni, 400, 401, 409 — sp., 406 Myxobolidc* 22, 23, 409 Myxobolus, 409 — cerebrolis, 400 — neurobius, 400 — pfeifferi, 405, 406 (Fig. 168) Myxocystis, 417, 418 Myxoflagollate, 239 Myxogastres, 242 Myxomycetes, 239, 242 Myxopodia, 253 Myxosporidia, 399 Myxotheca, 231 Nagana, 19 Narcotics, effects of, 204 Nassellaria, 256 Nassula, 439 Natural classification, 463 Nebenkern, 95 NebenkSrper, 278 Negri's bodies, 470 Nematooyst, 447 Neogamous, 127, 330 Neosporidia, 325, 398, 466 Nephroselmis, 275 Nervous system, 446 Neuronemes, 446 Neuroryctes, 470 — hydrophobias, 471 Neurosporidium, 424 — cephalodisci, 424 Nicollia, 380 — quadrigeminu, 380, 381 Nina. See Pierocephalus NoctUuca, 201, 213, 279 — miliarw, 119 (Fig. 65), 279 Nodosaria, 232 (Fig. 93, 3) Nosema, 418 — apis, 412 Nosema bombyds, 24, 411, 413, 414 (Fig. 172) Nuclear membrane, 76 — sap, 72 Nuclearia, 248 Nuclearia-Bt&ge, 177 Nucleo-cytoplasmio ratio, 70 Nuoleolo-centrosome, 95 Nuoleolus, 76, 103 Nucleophaga, 473 Nucleus, 6, 7, 65, 96 — seoundus, 95 Nuda, 217, 219 NummuMtes, 232 (Fig. 93, 11) Nutation, 51 Nutrition, 187 Nuttallia, 380 — egui, 380 — herpestidis, 380 Nyctotherus, 439, 440, 447 — cordiformis, 10 (Fig. 9), 444 (Fig. 186, F) — faba, 440 «v OctomUidce, 272 Ockrmitus, 36, 258, 272 — dujardini, 272 (Fig. 116) Octosporea, 418 — mutccB domesticcB, 138 Octozoic, 349 (Ecomonas, 270 CEsophagus, 261, 433 Oikomonas, 270 Oligosporea, 418 Oligosporulea, 424 Oligotrioha, 439 Oooyst, 348 Oooyte, 143 O6kinete, 305, 362 Opalina, 196, 198, .208, 209, 439, 440, 447, 448, 452, 454 — cavdata, 452 — inttstinalia, 452 — ranarum, 44V, 452, 453 Opalinince, 452 Opalinopsis, 452 Opercularia, 145, 440 — faurei, 442 Operculum, 441 Ophrydium, 438, 440 Ophryocvstidce, 341 Ophryocustis, 337, 339 Orcheobius, 352 Ophryodendridce, 461 Ophryodendron, 455, 461 OphryoscoleddcB, 439 Ophryoscolex, 439, 441 OrcheobiusherpobdelkB, 346, 348, 349, 352 Organella, 1 Oriental sore, 316 Osmotaxis, 203 Ovum, 125 Oxyrrhis, 52, 278 — marina, 278 (Fig. 123) Oxytricha, 202, 440 Oxytrichidce, 440 Pansporella perplexa, 427 Pansporoblast, 405, 417, 423 Pantastomina, 268 Parabasal apparatus, 89 Paracocddium prevoti, 349 INDEX 513 Paraglycogen, 41, 63, 195, 327 Paramastigote, 259 Parametidce, 439 Paramecium, 61, 114 (Fig. 61), 171, 191, 192, 194, 196, 197, 198, 203 (Fig. 83), 205, 206, 208, 210, 437, 489, 442, 443 — bursaria, 449 - caudatum, 107 (Fig. 53), 436 (Fig. 185), 444 (Fig. 186, D, E), 447 (Fig. 187) Paramoeba, 228 - eUhardi, 94 (Fig. 49), 95, 228 — hmninis, 228 Paramylnm, 63, 188, 195 Paramyxa, 243, 409 — paradoxa, 409 Paramyxidia, 409 Paraplasma flavigenum, 379 Parasite, 8, 14 Parietal cell, 403 Parthenogenesis, 137 Parthenogonidia, 267 Partial karyogamy, 126, 153, 453 Pathogenic, 19 — amoebae, 226 Pavlinella, 214 Pearl-stage, 334 Pebrine, 24, 411 Pectmellee, 442 Peduncle, 31 Pellicle, 32, 45, 435 Pelomvba, 78, 144, 150, 205, 214, 227 - palustris, 227 (Fig. 91) PeUomyces, 243 Peneroplis, 15, 235 Peranema, 274 — trichophorum, 273 PeranemidcB, 274 Perezia, 418 Perforate, 231 Peridiniales, 276 Peridinida, 278 Peridinium, 278 — divergens, 278 (Fig. 122) Peridium, 241 Perikaryon, 439 Periplast, 45, 259 Peripylaria, 251, 255 Peristome, 433, 442 Peritricha, 433, 438, 440, 441, 442, 448 Peritrichous larvae, 459 Peritromidce, 440 Peritromus, 440 Pernicious malaria, 358 Peroral membrane, 445 Phacus, 274 - triqueter, 274 (Fig. 118). Phaenocystes, 412 Phajodaria, 256 Phaeodium, 252 Phosphorescence, 201, 278 Phototaxis, 202, 205 Phylogeny, 463 Physarum didermoides, 242 Physodes, 244 Phytoflagellata, 274 Phytomonadina, 274 PhytomyxincB, 243 Piroplasma, 24, 357, 379, 393, 394 — bigeminum (boois), 379 (Fig. 160), 384, 385 (Fig. 162) — caballi, 379 Piroplasma canis, 382, 383 (Fig. 161), 384, 385 (Fig. 162), 387 — donovani, 393 — Aominis,~379 Piroplasmoses, 378 Piroplasms, 378, 390 PlagiotomidcB, 439 Planont, 398, 408, 413, 423 Planorbulina, 232 (Fig. 93, 9) Plasmodiophora, 243 — brassicce, 149 (Fig. 76), 243 Plasmodium, 100, 128, 240, 398, 423 Plasmodium, 357 — bravttianum, 364 — cynomolgi, 364 — diploglosxi, 358 — falciparum, 358, 359, 360 (Fig. 156) — inui, 364 — kochi, 364 — malanicB, 358, 359 — pithed, 359, 364 — prcecoSj 358 — relictum, 358 — vivax, 137 (Fig. 72), 358, 359, 360 (Fig. 156) — vassali, 364 Plasmodioma, 462 Plasmogamy, 128 Plasmotomy, 100 Plastin, 73, 103 Plastinoid granules, 41, 195, 346 Plastogamj, 128, 209 Plegopoda, 462 Pleistophora, 418 — lonyifdis, 413 (Fig. 171), 415, 416 — periplanetce, 416 — species, 413 Pleodorina californica, 267 Pleuronema, 55, 439, 442 — chrysalis, 56 (Fig. 27) PleuronemidcB, 439 Podophrya, 461 — fixa, 456 (Fig. 190, C), 458 — gemmipara, 108 (Fig. 55) — mottis, 456 (Fig. 190, A) Podophryida, 461 Polar bodies, 143 — capsule, 399 (Fig. 163) — cones, 117 — filament, 399 — masses, 110 — platos, 117 Polycaryum, 424 Polychromophilus, 364 Polycystid, 326 Polycyttaria, 256 Polyenergid nuclei, 121, 151, 255 Polykaryon, 121, 255 PolymastigidcB, 272 Polymastigina, 271 Polymastigote, 259 Poly-mastic, 272 Polymoiphism, 162, 163, 297, 311 Polyspora, 339 Polysporoa, 409, 418 Polysporulea, 424 Polystomella, 210 - crispa, 139, 234 (Fig. 95), 235, 236 (Fig. 96) Polythalamous, 36, 232 Polytomella agilis, 86 (Fig. 43) Polytrema, 231 33 514 THE PROTOZOA Polytricha, 439 Polyzoic, 349 Poneramceba, 224 Ponlobdella muricata, 291, 303 Pontomyxa Jlava, 218 Porospora, 337, 340 — gigantea, 74 (Fig. 35), 336, 339 (Fig. 150) — legeri, 336 Porosporidce, 341 Pouchetia, 62 — cornuta, 61 (Fig. 31) Prehensile tentacle, 457 Proboscidiform individuals, 455 Proboscidium, 442 Prococcidia, 352 Proflagellata, 469 Promitosis, 109 Pronucleus, 127 Propagativo cell, 405 — phase, 21, 166 Propulsive psoudopodium, 401 Prorocentraccse, 276 Prorocentrum, 278 Prorodon, 439 — feres, 32 (Fig. 14), 444 (Fig. 186, B, C), 446 Proteomyxa, 217, 268 Proteosoma, 358, 364, 365, 393 Protista, 4, 5 Protoblaet, 426 Frotococcaceee, 15 Protoentospora ptychoderce, 229 Protokaryon, 75> 87, 108 Protomerito, 327 Protomonadina, 270 Prolophrya, 452 — ovicola, 452 Protophyta, 8 Protoplasm, 29, 40 Protozoa, 2, 10, 464 Prowazek's bodies, 470 Prowazekia, 260, 271, 281, 319, 321, 322 — asiatica, 319 — cruzi, 319 — parrot, 319, 320 (Fig. 141) — weinbergi, 319, 320 (Fig. 141) Pseudochlamys-st&gG, 170, 177 Pseudoplasmodida, 243 Pseudoplasmodium, 242 Pseudopodiosporo, 169 Pseudopodium, 30, 46, 90, 199, 214, 400, 465 Pseudospora, 213, 218, 249 Psorosperm, 165, 323 Pterocephalus, 173, 327, 329, 330, 339 — oracilis* 174 (Fig. 79), 332 (Fig. 145), 334 (Fig. 147) — nobilis, 339 Pulsellum, 52, 259 Pusulc, 277 Pycnothrix, 452 — monocustoides, 443, 446, 447, 452 Pyramimonas, 275 Pyrenoid, 63, 188, 261 Pyrodinium, 201, 278 Pyrosoma, 379 Pyxinia, 329, 330 Quartan malaria, 358, 359 Radiolaria, 218, 249 Radium-rays, effects of, 205 Rainoy's corpuscles, 419 Reactions of protozoa, 201 Recapitulative forms, 170 Reducing division, 104 Reduction, 142, 145, 335 Reduction-nuclei, 144 Redwater, 378 Regeneration, 208, 210 Rejuvenescence, 155 Relapse (malarial), 363 Reserve-materials, 195, 196 Resorvoir-vacuole, 262 Respiration, 195 Reticulosa, 217, 218 Rcticuloso, 48 Retioulum (nuclear), 75, 103 — (protoplasmic), 41 Rhabdogonise, 325, 466 Khabdophrya, 461 — trimorplta, 455 Rhaphidiophrys, 245 Rhootaxis, 207 Rhinosporidium, 424 — kinealyi, 424, 425 (Fig. 177) Rhizomastjgina, 265, 268, 465 Rhizoplast, 82 Rhizopoda, 213, 217 Rhyncheta, 457, 460 Rhynchoflagellata, 278 Right hosts, 291 Rod-apparatus, 433, 439 Rdntgen-rays, effects of, 206 Rostrum, 326 Saccamina, 232 (Fig. 93, 1) Sack-pusulo, 277 Sapropelic, 14 Saprophytic, 8, 14, 187, 194, 262 Saprospira, 467, 469 — glandis, 468 Saprozoic, 14 Sarcocystine, 20, 420, 421 Sarcocystis, 20, 419 — bertrami, 420 — muris, 419, 420, 421, 422 (Fig. 176) — rileyi, 420 — tenella, 419, 420, 421 (Fig. 175) Sarcocyte, 327 Sarcode, 40 Sarcodina, 11, 213 Sarcosporidia, 20, 419 Scaiotricha, 440 Scarlet fever, 470 Schaudinnella, 355 Schewiakovella schmeili, 425 Schizocystida), 339, 341 Schizocystis, 339 — gregarinoides, 336, 338 (Fig. 149) Sohizogonea, 418 Schizogony, 166, 324, 392 Scbizogrogarinee, 328, 339 Schizokinete, 373 Schizont, 166, 181, 324 Schizontocyte, 344 Schizotrypanum, 285, 307, 392 — cruzi, 28, 295 (Fig. 128), 296, 302 (Fig. 132), 307 Schizozoite, 344, 428 Sclerotium, 166, 240 Scopula, 441, 456, 459 Scyphidia, 440, 441 Secondary nuclei, 66 INDEX 515 Secretion, 197, 198 Selenidiidw, 341 Selenidium, 339 — caulleryi, 336, 337 (Fig. 148) Selenococcidium, 352, 354 - intermedium, 344, 350 (Fig. 155), 351 Senility, 131, 135, 155 Sensory organs, 201, 446 Separation-spindle, 104 Septate, 326 Serumflporidia, 425 Sex, 154 Sexual differentiation, 160, 170, 176 — phases of try panosoraes, 305 Shell, 33, 45, 232 (Fig. 93) Siedleckia, 339, 352 Silicoflagollata, 274 Sleeping sickness, 26 Smithia, 380 — microti, 380 Souia, 130 Somatic number, 143 Sorophora, 243 Sorosphcera, 243 Sorus.242 Souma, 304 Spasmoneme, 448 Species, 141, 162 Spermatocyte, 143 Spermatozoon, 125 Sfjhioractinomyxon, 409 — stolci, 409, 410 (Fig. 170) Spheerellaria, 955 Sphceromyxa sdbrazesi, 404 (Fig. 167), 405 Sptuerophrya, 461 Sphserozoa, 256 Sphere, 95 Spheroplast, 41, 448 Spicule, 36 Spindle (nuclear), 103 Spirigera, 442 Spirillacea, 467 Spirillar forms, 319 Spirillum, 467 Spirochceta, 466 — plteatilie, 466 — ziemanni, 371, 468 Spirochsetes, 466 Spirochona, 440 SpirochonidcB, 440 Spiroloculina, 232 (Fig. 93, 5) Spironema, 467, 469 Spironemacea, 469 Spiroschaudinnia, 467 — anserina, 467 — duttoni, 467, 468 \ — gattinarum, 467 — obermeieri, 467 — recurrentis, 467 Spirostomum, 196, 197, 208, 438, 439, 445 — amMguum, 431 (Fig. 180) Sponyomonas, 270 — splendida, 84 (Fig. 41) — uvella, 85 (Fig. 42) Sporal residuum, 349 Sporangium, 240, 241 Spore, 165, 166, 323 Spore-formation, 166 Sporetia, 150 Sporoblast. 325 Sporocyst. 165 Sporocyst-mothor-cell, 403 Sporoduct, 335 Sporogony, 181, 325 Sporomyx <,, 243 Sporont, 166, 181, 325, 326 Sporophoro, 242 Sporoplasm, 405 Sporozoa, 12, 323, 462, 466 Sporozoito, 169, 324 Sporulation, 122, 165, 166 Spumellaria, 255 StannomidcB, 238 Starvation, 195, 210 Stemonitis flaccida, 82 — fusca, 240 (Fig. 98) Stemm-pseudopodium, 401 Stempellia, 418 — mttta&iZis, 418 Stenophora, 329 Stentor, 61, 202, 211, 437, 438, 439, 441, 445, 446' — ccertdeus, 444 (Fig. 186, A, I) — niger 444 (Fig. 186, G) — roeselii, 10 (Fig. 8) Stentarido), 439 Stephanosphcora, 267, 276 Steroomarium, 238 Steroome, 194, 233 Stigma, 61, 205, 262 Stomatophora coronata, 328 Streaming movements, 199 Strongyloplasmata, 470 Stylonychia, 438, 440 — histrio, 444 (Fig. 186, H) — mytilus, 211, 459 (Fig. 192) Stylvrhynchus, 173 329, 330, 339 — longicollis, 174 (Fig. 79), 327 (Fig. 142), 339 Suctoria, 455 Suctorial tentacle, 190, 458 SulcuB, 276 Surface-tension, 200 Surra, 26 Swarm-spore, 169, 396 Symbiosis, 15 Symbiotic algae, 197 Synactinomyxon, 409 Syngamy, 126, 438 Synkaryon, 127 Syphilis, 467 Syzygy, 330 Tachyblaston, 460 Tactic, 202 Tactile bristles, 443 — organs, 201 Tconiocystis, 327, 339 Taxis, 202 Technilella thompsoni, 34 Tcloblast, 426 Telomyxa, 418 — glugeiformis, 418 Telosporidia, 325, 395, 466 Temperature, effects of, 206 Tentaoulifera, 455 Tertian malaria, 358, 359 Tost, 33 Testacea, 217, 219 Tetramyxa, 243 Tetratrichomonas, 272 Totrazoio, 349 Thalamophora, 219 516 THE PROTOZOA Thalaasicolla, 255 — pelagica, 30 (Fig. 13) Thalassophysa, 255 Thocamoebse, 219, 229 Theileria, 379 — parva, 380, 382, 386 Thelohania, 418 — chcetogastris, 416 (Fig. 173) — contejeani, 412 — mccnadis, 416 Thelyplasm, 129 Thormotaxis, 202, 206 Thigmotaxis, 207 Thyroid extract, effects ot, 204 Tinctin-body, 458 TintinnidcB, 439, 441, 443, 447 Tocophrya, 461 — cyclopum, 461 — limbata, 460 — quadripartita, 210, 456 (Fig. 1£0. B) 460 Toddia, 387 — bufonia, 387 Tolerant, 21 Tonicity, effects of, 207 Total karyogamy, 126, 453 Toxocystis homari, 426 Toxoplasma, 319, 387 — canis, 387 — cuniculi, 387 — gondii, 387 — talpce, 387 Trachelida), 439 TracheUus, 439 — otntm, 441, 448 Trachelocerca, 439, 448, 453 — phcenfcopterus, 120 (Fig. 66), 449, 450 (Fig. 188) Trachoma, 470 Tractellum, 52, 259 Trailing flagellum, 53, 260 Transmission of trypanosomcs, 289 Transmutation of energy, 199 Treponema, 467 — paUidum, 467, 468 — pertenue, 467 Triactinomyxon, 409 Trichia varia, 241 (Fig. 101) Triohites, 442 Triohocyst, 46, 435, 447 (Fig. 187) Trichodina, 440, 441 Trichomaslix, 260, 271 Trichomonas, 17, 36, 56, 258, 260, 271 — eberthi, 8 (Fig. 5), 36 — hominis, 272 — vaginalis, 272 Trichonympha, 276 — hertwigi, 276 Trichonympnida, 463 TrichonymphidcD, 89, 276, 454 Trichophrya, 461 TrichophryidcG, 461 Trichorhynchus, 446 Trichosphcorium, 51, 216, 229 — sieboldi, 73 (Fig. 34), 182 (Fig. 81) Trimastigamceba^ 268 Tripylaria, 251, 256 Tritoblast, 426 Trizoic, 349 Trophic phase, 324 Trophochromatin, 71 Trophocbromidia, 150 Trophonucleus, 78 85, 286, 288 Trophozoito, 324 Tropical malaria, 358 Trypanomonad, 282, 298, 299 Trypanomarphft, 308 Trypanophis grobbem, 309 Trypanoplasma, 56, 78, 87, 260, 271, 281, 287, 308, 309, 321, 322 — abramidis, 310 (Fig. 134) — borreli, 312 — congeri, 312 — dendrocceli, 309 — gryttotalpcB, 309, 310 — gurneyorum, 78 (Fig. 36) — helicis, 309, 311, 312 — intestinalis, 312 — keysselitzi, 310 (Fig. 134) — ranee, 319 — vaginalis, 309 Trypanosoma, 270, 280, 283, 308, 320, 321 — baJbianii, 467 — blanchardi, 25 — brucii, 19, 25, 26, 27 (Fig. 12), 285, 291, 296, 305, 306, 308 — cazalboui, 304 — cruzi, 285, 295, 296 — cuniculi, 25, 26 (Fig. 11) — dimorphon, 304 — drosophilcB, 315 (Fig. 137) — duttoni, 25, 2« (Fig. 1.1) — elyomis, 25, 26 (Fig. 11) — equinum, 285, 305 — equiperdum, 22, 26, 285 — evansi, 26, 27 (Fig. 12), 285 — gambiense, 19, 26, 27 (Fig. 12), 285, 291, 296, 297, 303, 304, 305, 306 — granulosum, 288, 297, 298 (Fig. 129) — grayi, 304 — hippicum, 285 — inopinatum, 290 — lewiei, 19, 25, 26 (Fig. 11), 28, 263, — 286, 291. 292, 293 (Fig. 127). 297, 299, 300 (Fig. 130), 301 (Fig. 131). 305, 306, 308 — longocaudense, 294 — mega, 284 (Fig 125) — microti, 25, 26 (Fig. 11) — nanum, 27 (Fig. 12) — noctuai, 59 (Fig. 30), 137, 144, 158, 283, 297, 305, 306, 308, 391 — pecaudi, 304 — percts (myonomos), 58 (Fig. 28) — rabinou-Uschi, 25 — raids, 291, 303 — remaki, 9 (Fig. 6) — rhodesiense, 26, 286 — rotatarium, 59 (Fig. 30), 283, 297, 307 — sangui n is, 283 — vittatcB, 303 — vivax, 27 (Fig. 12), 287, 291, 304 Trypanosomos, syngamy, 136 Trypanosomidce, 268, 270 Trypanotoxin, 20 Trypanozoon, 308 Ultramicroscopic stages, 3C6 Unciform individuals, 455 Undulating membrane, 55, 260. 286, 287, 443 Undulina ranarum, 283 Unicellular, 1, 3 INDEX 517 Ureeolarincp., 440 Urhiemoflagellat, 468 Urnula, 457, 480 — epistylidis, 457 (Fjfi 191), 460 UrnulidcB, 460 Urospora lagidis gametes, 174 (Fig. 79) Urosporidium, 424 Urostyla, 440 Vaccinia, 470 Vacuole, 43 Vaginicola, 440 Vampyrella, 218 — lateritia, 219 (Fig. 86) Variola, 470 Vegetative chromatin, 71 Vermiform individuals, 455 Vestibule, 433 Volutin, 68, 195, 289 VolvoddcB, 267, 275 Volvox, 3, 131, 206, 267, 276 Vorticella, 440, 441, 445, 446 VorticeUa microstoma, 172 (Fig. 78) — monilata, 446 Vorticellidce, 440 Vorticellinco, 440 Wagneretta, 48, 51, 92, 120, 245, 246, 248 — borealis, 93 (Fig. 48), 247 (Fig. 102) Wrong hosts 291 Xenophya, 34, 238 Xenophyophora, 218, 237 Yaws, 467 Yellow cells, 252 Zoochlorollse, 15, 252 Zoomyxa, 243 Zoospore, 169, 262 ZoosporidcB, 218 Zoothamnium, 440 Zooxanthellse, 15, 252 Zygote, 125 THE END Mnnul ftnpresnion. Printed in England for the Mutton Company, by LOWE& BBVDONE, LTD., PARK STREET, LONDON, N.W. 1. 518 MEMORANDA MEMORANDA 519 520 MEMORANDA Oo University of Toronto Library Acme Library Card Pocket Under Pat. "Ref. Index File" Made by LIBRARY BUREAU