i 6^6 V o^ .t^ v# 4L^>-'3t%^ THE IRISH NATURALIST ^ lfibtonti|^^J ^ontnai OP GENERAL IRISH NATURAL HISTORY. THE) OFFICIAI, ORGAN OF The Royal Zoological Society of Ireland ; TJie Dublin Microscopical Club ; The Belfast Natural History and Philosophical Society ; The Belfast Naturalists' Field Club ; The Dublin Naturalists' Field Club ; The Armagh Natural History and Philosophical Society ; The Cork Naturalists' Field Club ; The Limerick and Clare Field Club. - EDITED BY _ GEORGE H. CARPENTER, B.Sc.Eond, AND R. EEOYD PRAEGER, B.A, B.E., M.R.I.A. VOL. IX. DUBEIN : EASON & SON, Eimitkd, 85 MIDDLE ABBEY STREET, and 40 LOWER SACKVILLE STREET. BELFAST : 17 DONEGALL STREET. LONDON : SIMPKIN MARSHALL, HAMILTON, KENT & Co., Ltd 1900. Printed by Alex. Thcm & Co. (Limited), 87, 88, iS: 89, Abbey-.street, Dublin. CONTRIBUTORS l^C ^l/ TO THK PRKSKNT VOLUME.\^ N. H. AivCOCK, M.D., Trinity College, Dublin. Prof. R. J. Anderson, m.d., Queen's College, Galway. Capt. G. E. H. Barrett. HAMiiyTON, b.a., f.z.s., Kilmanock, Co. Wexford. R. M. Harrington, IvIv.b., f.i,.s., Fassaroe, Bray E. Bi,ake-Knox, M.B., R.A.M.c, Bray. Rev. S. a. Brenan, B.A., Knocknacary, Co. Antrim. C. W. BUCKI.E, Belfast. Rev. J. G. Burton, d.d., Killiuchy, Co Down. D. C. Campbei.Iv, I^ondonderry. Prof. G. A. J. C01.E, f.g.s., m.r.i.a.. Royal College of Science, Dublin. N. CoIvGan, m.r.i.a., Sandycove, Co. Dublin. W. E. CoLiyiNGE, F.Z.S., Mason University College, Birmingham. G. C. Crick, f.g.s., British Museum Nat. Hist.), London, S.W. W. A. CuNNiNGTON, A.R.csc. i,OND., Royal College of Science, Dublin. J. H. DaviES, Lisburn. Hon. R. E. Dit.IvON, d.i.., Clonbrock, Co. Galway. G. C1.ARIDGE Druce, M.A., F.i,.S., High-?;treet, Oxford. Rev. M. Fahy, m.a,, Duneane, Toome. J. A. Faris, Corr, Co. Cavan. Rev. Canon T. B. Gibson, m.a., Ferns. R. M. Gii^more, Galway. M. G1.EESON, Nenagh. W. A. Green, Belfast. J. E. Grubb, Carrick-on-Suir. J. N. Hai^bert, Science and Art Museum, Dublin. J, HamiIvTON, Holywood, Co. Down. H. C. Hart, b.a., f.i,.s., Carrablagh, Co. Donegal. \V. E. Hart, Howth, Co. Dublin. Prof. M. M. Hartog, d.sc, Queen's College, Cork. REV. W. F.Johnson, m.a., F.E-S., Acton, Poyntzpass. W. F. DE V. Kane, d.i.., m.a., f.e.S., Drumreaske, Monaghan. Mrs. M. J. IvEEBODY, Londonderry. Rev. H. W. Lett, m.a., Loughbrickland, Co. Down. Rev. E. F. Linton, m.a., f.i,.s., Bournemouth. David M'Ardi^e, Royal Botanic Gardens, Glasnevin. Q. B. Moffat, Ballyhyland. Co. Wexford. A 2 {y List of Co7itributors. J. H. 0'CONNEi.iv, Dublin. H. L. Orr, Belfast. D. R. Pack-BkrEvSPOrd, Bageualstown. C. J. Patten, m.d., Trinity College, Dublin. R. Patterson, f.z.s., Belfast. R IvL. Patterson, d.i,., j.p., Holy wood, Co. Down. R. A. Phii^IvIPS, Ashburton, Cork. R. Ivi.. Praeger, B.E-, M.R.I. a., National I^ibrary, Dublin. J. G. Robertson, Cullenswood, Dublin. T. ROGiCRS, Manchester. R. F. ScHARFF, PH.D., M.R.I. A., Science and Art Museum, Dublin. R. W. ScuivivY, i,.R.C.S., F.i^.s., Dublin. J. S. Starkey, Rathmines. S. A. Stewart, f.b.s.ED., Museum, Belfast. J. W. Tayi^or, f.i,.s., Leeds. R.J. USSHER, J.P., Cappagh, Co. Waterford. Robert Warren, j p., Moyview, Ballina. R. WEI.CH, Belfast. E. Wii,i,iAMS, Dublin. J. J. \Voi,FE, Skibbereen. Joseph Wright, f.g.s., Belfast. PIRATES AND II^IvUSTRATIONS. Lejeunea rossettiana (Plate i), . . . .To face p. 23 Foraminifera from Dog's Bay (Plate 2), . . . To face p. 51 Heads with Skulls of Irish Cetacea (Plate 3), . . To face p. 83 Do., do., do. (Plate 4), . . . p. 87 Arrenurus Kanei (figs. 1-4), .... pp. 95, 96 Abnormal Shell of Helix nemoralis and Eggs of Geomalacus (Plate 5), . . : . . To face p. 163 Map showing Occurrence of the Ruff in Ireland (Plate 6), To face p. i Jrish Land Planarians, . . . . . . p- 217 IND EX. O Acanthosoma haemorrhoidale, 129. Acherontia atropos, 233. Alchemilla vulgaris, 92. Alcock, N. H.— Dublin Field Club Prize Scheme, 129. Allium vineale, 244. Amphipeplea glutinosa, 48. Amphipoda, 182. Anderson, R. J.— Crookedness in sterna of Fowls, 150. Annelids, 181. Ariou ater (empiricorum), var. Bocagei, 47, 106. Armagh Flora, 22. Arrenurus Kanei, 94. I Barrett - Hamilton, G. E- H. — Ranunculus parviflorus in Co. Wexford, 129 ; New Locality for Leisler's Bat, 134 ; Influence of Man and Civilisation on Birds, 161; Secondary Sexual Characters (reviewed), 266. Barrington, R. M. — Late Wasps' Nests, 108; Dublin Field Club Prize Scheme, 128; Acherontia atropos off" the Wexford Coast, 233. Bats (Hairy-armed), 134, 162, 235 ; (Whiskered), 162 ; in N. Ireland, 233 ; (Natterer's), 274. Bather, Gregory, and Goodrich on Echinoderma (reviewed), 118. Beetles of Foyle District, 2, 21 ; of Lough Ree District, 19; Irish, 70, 131, 182; from Co. Wicklow, 108 ; of Dublin District, 278. Belfast Naturalists' Field Club, 16, 45, 100, 154, 179, 214, 230, 242,267. Belfast Natural History and Philo- sophical Society, 100, 153, 180, 288. Bewick's Swan, 21. Birds, Influence of Man on, 161 ; Nests in strange places, 186; of Ireland and Switzerland, 186 ; of Lough Erne, &c., 220 ; Irish, 248, 251. Bittern, 81, 273. Blake-Knox, E- — Ruflf in Ireland, 294. Botanical Exploration, 135 ; Notes from N. Ireland, 218. Botany of Lough Ree, 18 ; of Co. Armagh, 22; of Mayo and Gal way Highland, iii ; of Lough Conn, 224; of Limerick, 260. Botaurus stellaris, 81 ; 273. Botrytis dichotoma, 98. Boycott and Bowell on Mollusca of Herefordshire (reviewed), 13. Brenan, S. A. — Acanthosoma haemorrhoidale in Co. Antrim, 129. Buckle, C. W. — Beetles collected in Lough Foyle District, 2 ; Notes on Coleoptera, 130. Bundoran, Helix nemoralis at, 163, 271. Burton, J. G. — Curious Note of Cuckoo, 186. Buteo lagopus, 50. Buzzard (Rough-legged), 50. Campbell, D. C— Rough-legged Buzzard near Londonderry, 50 ; Bittern and Grey Phalarope near Londonderry, 81 ; Lepidoptera near Londonderry, 246. Carboniferous Cephalopoda of Ireland, 14; Lamellibranchiata, 274. Carex riparia, 158. Cephalopoda, Irish carboniferous, 14. Cetacea, Irish, 83, 210. Chara canescens, 243 Circus Montagui. 21, Cladium jamaicense, 158. Coccospheres, 15. Cole, G. A. J. — Foraminiferal de- posits of Roundstone, 274 Coleoptera of Foyle District, 2, 21 ; Irish, 70, 130, 131, 182; of Dublin District, 278. Colgan, N.— Remarks on Cybele Hibernica, 56; Botanical Notes on Galway and Mayo Highlands, III; Matricaria discoidea in Ireland, 232 ; Elymus arenarius in Co. Dublin, 269. 57761 VI Index. Colias edusa, 47, 246. Colliuge, W. K.— Arion empiri- corum, var. Bocagei, 106, 107. Cooke on Geography (reviewed), 96. Cork Naturalists' Field Club, 46, 128, 157,214,268. Corydalis claviculata, 105. Crabs, 120. Crake (Spotted), 161. Crick, G. C. — Review of Foord's " Carboniferous Cephalopoda," 14. Crossbills, 293. Cuckoo, Note of, 186. Cunningham, J. T., on Sexual Dimorphism (reviewed), 177. Cunnington, W. A. — Seashore Crabs, 120. Cybele Hibernica, 27, 56 Cygnus Bewickii, 21. Cystophora cristata, 82. Davies, J. H. — Mosses from N.E. Ireland, 171 ; Botanical Notes irom N. Ireland, 218. Dillon, R. E. — Colias edusa in Ireland, 246. Dolphins, 89, 211. Donegal, Flora of, 27. Dublin district, Beetles of, 278. Druce, G. C. — Irish Rubi, i. Dublin Microscopical Club, 15, 46, 98, 102, 287. Dublin Naturalists' Field Club, 18, 79, 128, 156, 178, 230, 267, 288, Echinoderma, 118. Elymus arenarius, 269. Kmberiza schoeniclus, 133. Entomostraca of Lough Ree, 12. Ewart, A. J., on Botany (reviewed), 234- Fahy, M. — Egyptian Goose in Co. Derry, 160. Faris, J. A. — Birds' Nests in strange places, 186. Flora, Irish, 27, 56, 68. Flora of Lough Ree, 18 ; of Co. Armagh, 22 ; of Galway and Mayo Highlands, lu ; of Lough Conn, 224; of Limerick, 260. Flowers and Insects, 212. Foord on Carboniferous Cephalo- poda of Ireland (reviewed), 14. Foot, A. W. (Obituary), 241. Foraminifera of Dogs' Bay, 51, 274. Fowls, Crookedness of Sterna, 150. Fox, Disappearance from Co. Antrim, 275. Fox Shark, 108. Foyle District, Beetles of, 2, 21. Fry on Mycetozoa (reviewed), 75. Galway and Mayo Highlands, Bo- tanical Notes on, iii. Gaudryina rudis, 53. Geomalacus maculosus, 168. Gibson, T. B. — Spring Migrants in Co. Wexford, 159. Gilmore, R. M.— Hooded Seal in Galway Bay, 82. Glacial Period, 32, 61, 68. Gleeson, M. — Bird Notes from N. Tipperary, 132. Gnophria quadra, 292. Gold from Co. Wicklow, 16, 46. Goose (Snow), 109; (Egyptian), 160. Green, W. A.— Scalariform Helix nemoralis, 271. Grubb, J. E.— Winter flowering of Corydalis, 105. Hairy-armed Bat, 134, 235. Halbert, J. N.— Beetles of Foyle District, 21 ; New Water Mite from Ulster, 94; Additions to Beetles of Dublin District, 278. Hamilton, J.— Vanessa io in Co. Down, 292. Haplophthalmus Mengei, 246. Hart, H. C— Remarks on Cybele Hibernica, 27. Hart, W. E.— Flowers and Insects, 212 ; Colias edusa in Ireland, 246 ; Vanessa io in Co. Derry, 270. Hartog, M.— Secondary sexual characters, 177. Hedgehog and its food, 50, no. Helix ericetorum (reversed), 21 ; H. nemoralis (abnormal shells), 163 ; (scalariform), 271. Hodges, J. F. (obituary notice), 76. Hoopoe, 160. Horse Warble-fly, 247. Ilydrobia Jenkinsi, 213. IlA-pochaeris glabra, 244. H\poderma silenus, 247. Insects and flowers, 212. Insects of Lough Ree, 19; of Co. Antrim, 20; of Ulster, 183, 290. Index. Vll Johnston, W. F.— Notes on Irish Coleoptera, 70 ; Stachys betonica in Co. Armagh, 105; Additional Records of Irish Coleoptera, 131, 182; Entomological Notes from Ulster, 183, 290; vSpring Migrants in Poyntzpass, 213; Braconid parasitic on Anobium, 270. Kane, W. F. de V. — Entomostraca from Lough Ree, 12 ; Haploph- thalmus Mengei in Ireland, 246 ; Noteworthy Irish Lepidoptera, 271, Killarney Hepaticse, 23. Kingfisher, 159. Lagena squamosa, 54. Land and Freshwater moUusca, 159. Lankester's zoology (reviewed), 118, 258. Lapwing, 49- Leebody, M. J.— Rediscovery of Poa comp'ressa at Londonderry, 232. Leisler's Bat,' 134. Lejeunea rossettiana, 24. Lepidoptera of Co. Cork, 159 ; of Londonderry, 246; Noteworthy, 271. Lepidozia Pearsoni, 15. Lett, H. W.— Sphagnum medium in Ireland, 80. Limerick Field Club, 77. Limerick Flora, 260. Linton, |E. F.— Distribution of Alchemilla vulgaris group, 92; on Flora of Bournemouth (re- viewed), 250. Lucas on British Dragonflies (re- viewed), 74. Machetes pugnax, 187, 247, 272, 294. M'Ardle, D.— Hepaticse of Ross Island, Killarney, 23. Marten, 162, 186. Matricaria discoidea, 232, 269. Minchin, Fowler, and Browne on Porifera and Coelentera (re- viewed), 258. Moffat, C. B.— Late Wasps' Nests, 47 ; Hedgehog and its Food, 50 ; Pied Wagtails roosting among reeds, 82'; Hairy-armed Bat m Co. Wexford, 162; Orobanche major fertilised by Wai^ps, 181 ; Habits of Hairy-armed Bat, 235 ; Plautago media in Co. Wexford, 245; Warbles in Horses, 247; Birds of Ireland, 251 ; Gnophria quadra in Co. Wexford and Isle of Man, 292. MoUusca, Varieties of Laud, 131 ; Marine, 266. Montagu's Harrier, 21. Mosses from N.E. Ireland, 171, 243. Moss Exchange Club, 268. Mus hibernicus, 1 10. Mycetozoa, 75. Natterer's Bat, 274c Nephthydidae, 233. Nests of Wasps, 47, 108; of Birds, 186. Nichols, A. R., on Marine MoUusca (reviewed), 266. Obituary.— J. F. Hodges, 76; Thos. Workman, 241 ; A. W. Foot, 241. O'Connell, J. H.— Hedgehog and its food, 50. Ornithology, Irish, 49. Orobanche major, 181. Orr, H. L.— Insect Notes from Co. Antrim, 20 ; Hedgehog and its food, no; Food of Trout, 213. Otiorrhynchus auropunctatus, 108, 283. Pack-Beresford, D. R.— Irish Rats, no. Paiidion haliaetus, 22. Pastor roseus, 22. Patten, C. J. — Sea birds and severe weather, 109 ; Dublin Field Club Prize Scheme, 129; Reed Buntings on the Sea-beach, 133; Nocturnal Habits of Grey Plover, 133 ; Natural History of Ruff, 187, 272. Patterson, R.— Hoopoe in Co. Antrim, 160; Martens in N. Ireland, 162 ; Whiskered Bat in Co. Down, 162 ; Marten in Co. Derry, 186; Bats in N. Ireland, 233 ; Common Bittern in Co. Down, 273 ; Early arrival of Red- wing, 273 ; Natterer's Bat in Co. Antrim, 274 ; Disappearance of Fox from Co. Antrim, 275. Patterson, R. LI. — Notes on Irish Cetacea, 210; Vision of Whales, 273- Phalaropus fulicarius, 81. Phillips, R. A Hydropia Jenkinsi in S.E. Ireland, 213 ; Chara canescens in Galway, 243; Viola lactea in Ireland, 244; Senecio squalidus in Dublin, 245. Vlll index. Planarians, 215. * Plantago media, 245. Plover (Golden), 49 ; (Grey), 133. Poa compressa, 219, 232, 269. Porpoises, 88. Praeger, R. LI. — Flora of Co. Armagh, 22 ; Scirpus Savii grow- ing inland, 105 ; Irish Topogra- phical Botany, 129; Botanical Exploration in 1899, 135; Cladium jamaicense and Carex riparia in Co. Down, 158; Round Lough Conn, 224 ; Matricaria discoidea in Ireland, 232; Vitality of Allium vineale, 244; Notes on Limerick Flora, 260 ; New Stations for rare Plants, 285. Psych odidae, 182. Ranunculus parviflorus, 129. Rat (Irish), 1 10. Redwing, 273. Ree, Lough, Entomostraca, 12 ; Flora, 18 ; Insects, 19. Reed Buntings, 133. Reed Warbler, 81, 132. Reviews. — Boycott and Bowell : Mollusca of Herefordshire, 13; Foord : Carboniferous Cephalo- poda of Ireland, 14; Lucas: British Dragonflies, 74; Frv' : Mycetozoa, 75; Cooke: Geo- graphy for Irish Schools, 96: Lankester : Treatise on Zoology, 118, 258; Cunningham: Sexual Dimorphism, 177; Schmeil: Text-book of Zoology, 234, 249 ; Ewart: First Stage Botany, 234; Linton : Flora of Bournemouth, 250; Ussher: Birds of Ireland, 251 ; Fauna and Flora of Valencia Harbour, 265 ; Nichols : Irish Marine Mollusca, 266; Barrett- Hamilton : Secondary Sexual Characters, 266. Robertson, J. G.— Kingfisher at Ranelagh, 159. Rogers, T.— Eggs of Kerry Slug, 168. Rorquals, 85. Rose-coloured Pastor, 22. Ross Island, Hepaticse of, 23. Royal Zoological Society, 15, 45, 76, 98, 127, 153, 178, 214, 230, 242, 267, 287. Rubi, Irish, i. Ruft, 187, 247, 272, i94- Sandwich Terns, 220. Scharff, R. F.— Arion ater vah Bocagei in Ireland, 47 ; Irish Flora in Glacial Period, 68 ; List of Irish Cetacea, 83 ; Arion Bocagei, 107 ; Trichoniscus vivi- dus at Cappagh, 158; Attempted Introduction of American Shad, 185 ; Irish Species of Land Plan- arians, 215. Scirpus Savii, 105 ; S. triqueter, 262. Schmeil, O., on Zoology- (reviewed), 234. 249. Scully, R. W.— Remarks on Cybele Hibernica, 56. Seal (Hooded), 82. Secondary sexual characters, 177, 266. Senecio squalidus, 245. Shad (American), 185. Sharks (Blue and Fox), 48, 108 ; (Porbeagle), 292. Shell of Helix nemoralis, 163 Slugs (eggs 01), 168. Snow- goose, 109, Spathius exarator, 270. Sphagnum medium, 80. Spiders of Lough Ree, 20. Spring migrants, 159, 213. Stachys Betonica, 105. Starkey, J. S. — Beetle Records from Co. Wicklow, 108. Stations for Rare Plants, 285 Sterna of Domestic Fowls, 150. vStewart, S. A. — Poa compressa, 269, Taylor, J. W.— Arion Bocagei, 106. Tern (Sandwich), 220. Tipperary, Birds of, 102. Tope, 292. Topographical Botany, 129. Trichoniscus vividus, 158, Trout, Food of, 213. Truffles, 268. Upupa epops, 160. Ussher, R. J. — Supposed Reed- warbler in Co. Tipperary, 81 ; Snow-goose in Ireland, 109; Call of Spotted Crate, i6o ; Ruff in Ireland, 247 ; Birds of Ireland (reviewed), 251. Index. IX Valencia, Fauna and Flora of, 265. Vanessa io, 270, 292. Vertigo antivertigo, 48. Vespertilio niystacinus, 162 ; V. Nattereri, 274. Vespenigo Leisleri, 134, 162, 235. Viola lactea, 244. Vision of Whales, &c., 248, 273. Wagtails (Pied), 82. Wallace, R. H., on White Cattle (re\'iewed), 249. arbles in Horses, 247. Warren, R. — Bewick's Swans in Moy Kstuary, 21 ; Rose-coloured Pastor in Co. Mayo, 22 ; Blue Sharks in Killala Bay, 48, 108; Golden Plover and Lapwings in Moy Estuary, 49 ; Visit to Lough Erne, 220 ; Birds of Ireland (reviewed), 251 ; Porbeagle Shark and Tope in Killala Bay, 292. Wasps fertilising Orobanche, 181. Wasps' Nests, late, 47, 108. Welch, R. — Reversed Helix erice- torum at Bundoran, 21 ; Amphi- peplea glutinosa in Ireland, 48; Abnormalities in Shell of Helix nemoralis, 163. Whales, 83, 210, 248, 273. Whiskered Bat, 162. White Cattle, 249. Williams, K. — Montagu's Harrier in Wicklow, 21 ; Ospreys in Ire- land, 22 ; Rose-coloured Pastor in Co. Mayo, 22. Wolfe, J. J. — Crossbills nesting in S. Cork, 293. Workman, T. (Obituary), 241. Worms, Marine, 181. Wright, J. — Foraminifera of Dog's Bay, 51. Zelleria phillyrella, 47. Zoological Text-books, 118, 249, 258. *34, :!as'^ ERRATA. Page 3, line 8 from bottom, for congulus read longulus. 5, ,, 5 from top, for clavicoriiis read clavicornis, 5, „ ID ,, ,, ccEtattis read calatus, 6, „ 20 ,, „ Laheridiiis read Lathriditis, 6, „ 10 „ ,, psolifesicornis r^2L^ prolifericornis. 7, „ I „ „ codhlaria read cochlearicc, 8, „ 5 and 6 from bottom, delete record of H, mehnarius. 49, „ 19 from top, for 1878 read 1879. 120, „ 2 for W. H. Cuunington read W. A. Cunnington, ^ije ^vi^lj |laturali0t. VOLUME IX. IRISH RUBI. BY G. CT.ARIDGE DRUCE, M.\., F.T,.S. Dr. Fockr has kindly looked over some Brambles collected by me in Ireland in 189S, and reports as follows. It must be borne in mind, however, that the identification of a Bramble from a single dried specimen is hardly fair even to the most expert specialist, and in some of the following instances I was only able to supply such confessedly imperfect material :-■ Rubus Borreri, Bell-Salter— Near Lough Gilly, Co. Armagh. R. incurvatuSy Bab. — Near Toome Bridge, Co. Derry. Not given for district xii. in C}'d. Hib. R. Leyanus, Rogers— Near Toome Bridge, Derry and Antrim. Not in district xii. in Cyb. Hib. R. Crlfflthlanus, Rogers — Cave Hill, Antrim; as this is not included in Cyb. Hib. it will have to be re-gathered. R. pllcatus, W. and N.— Near Lough Neagh, Derr}-. R. radula, Weihe. — Tollymore Park, Go. Down. R. pulcherrimus, Neum. — Lough Gilly, Co. Armagh. Not given for district x. in Cyb. Hib. R. ang-Iosaxonicus, Gelert.— Glenarni, Co. Antrim. Not given for district xii. in Cyb. Hib. R. vlllicaulls, W. and N.— Near Toome Bridge, Co. Derry. R. mucronatus, Blox., var. trifollatus.— On Cave Hill; a form not previously recorded for Ireland. R. macrophyllus, W. and N — Very fine and luxuriant between Glenarni and Glenariff. R. pyramidal Is, Kalt— Cave Hill, Co. Antrim. High-street, Oxford. 2 The Irish Naturalui. [ January, BEETLES COI.LECTED IN I.OUGH FOYLE DISTRICT, COS, DONEGAL AND DERRY. BY C. W. BUCKLE. The beetles included in the following list, which numbers about 760 species, were alltaken within ten miles of the shores of lyOUghFoyle during the years 1896 to 1899. Among the more interesting beetles which are specially mentioned at the end of the list are some forty species which had not previously been taken in Ireland or hitherto remained unrecorded. On the north shore of Lough Foyle, where the majority of the collection was made, the soil is chiefly a wet clay overlying rock. A narrow .strip of land of a width varying from two to four miles bordering the Lough is cultivated, and behind this comes an uninterrupted chain of hills of moderate height — the highest being 1,300 feet — extending from Culmore to Inish- owen Head. These hills, which are covered with a thick laj^er of peat, are, speaking generally, too wet and uncongenial for most beetles, except aquatic and semi-aquatic species. The beetles met with on the drier portions include Carabits catenulattis, C. ?i7fe?is, Pterosiichus vitrciis, &c., but the Donegal hills seem unproductive of many rarities ; the majority of beetles met with being the commoner Carabidce. The most successful collecting was done on the low-lying land bordering the north shore of Lough Foyle. Very little collecting was done on the south side of the Lough, \\ here the country is much drier. The sand-hills at Magilligan, and at Buncrana, Lough Swilly, were very productive, considering the small amount of time that was spent there. They produced such local species as Tachhuis elongatus, Acidota cre7iaia, Xayitholinus distans, Bledius loiigtdus, B. crraticus, Helophorus rtcgostis, Cistela lupertcs, Otiorrhynchus blajidus, Sitoties cambricus, S. lincellus, Rhinondms castor, &c., besides a large number of commoner things. The nomenclature used is that of the Catalogue of British Coleoptera by Sharp and Fowler, 1893. I900. BucKLK- — Beetles of Lough Foyle District. Cychrus rostratus. Carabiis catenulatux. C. ntmoralis. C. nit ens. C. gramtlatns, Notiophiliis biguttaliis, X. substriatits. N. aquatiats. N. palustris. Leistus fulvibarhif, L, rufescens, Nebria brevicollis. N. Gyllenhali. Blethisa nmltipunctata. Elaphrus 7'iparii(s. E. cuprens. Loricera pilicornis. Clivinafossor. Dyschirms thoraci'nis. D. politus. D. cenem. P. globosHs. Broscus cephalotes. Badister bipustidatus. Bradycellus distincUts. B. verbasci. B. harpalUws. B. similis. Harpahts rujibarbis. H. ruficornis. H. aneus. H. latus. H. tardus. Dichirotrich us pubt-scens. Stomis pumicatus. Pterostichus cupreus, P. versicolor. P, niadidus. P. vitreus. P. nigcr. P. vulgaris. P. nigrita. P. minor. P. stremius. P. diligtns. P. striola. ^mara fulva. Amara apricaria. ./. spinipes. A. bifrons. A. ovata. A. aciuninata. A. tibialis. A. Innicollis. A. famiiiaris. A. trivia lis. A. comtnunis. Calathiis ciste hides. C. mollis. C. vielanocepkaUis. var. nubigeva. C. piceus. Taphria nivalis. Pristonychns terricola. A nchomen us a7i^ usticollis. A. dorsalis. A. albipes. A. inarginattts. A. parumpnncfatiis. A. atratus. A. fuliginosiis. A. gracilis. A. piceus. A. puellus. Olisthopus rotundatus. Cillenus lateralis. Bembidiuni rufescens. B. v-striatwn . B. obtusnm. B. Mannerheimi^ B. czneum. B. doris, B. minimujii . B. lampros. B. tibiale. B. atroccpruleutn. J), decorum. B. affine. B. monticola. B. concinnum, B . femoratum . B, bruxcllense. B. Uttorale. B. pallidipenm. Bembidiuni bipunctafu/n. B. punctulatum. 'I 'achypHS Jlavipes. Aepus marinus. Trechus rubens. T. minutus. var. obtusus. Patrobns assimilis. Dromius linearis. D. ?neridionalis. D, iv.'maculatiis. D, iv.-notatus. D. melanocephahis. D, nigriventris. Haliplus Jlavicollis. H. fulviis. II. ruficollis. H.Jiuviatilis, H. lineatocoUis. Noterus sparsus. L accoph ilus hyalin us. Ccelambus incequalis. C. impressopunctatus. Deronectes assimilis. D. depressus. D. xii. -pustulatus. Hydroporus lepidus. H, rivalis. If. septentriojialis, H. Davisii. H. tristis. //. umbrosus. H. angustatus, H. Gyllenhali. H. morio. H. vittula. H. palustris. PI. incognitus. PI. erythrocepJialus. II. congjtlus. H. memnonius. H. obscurus. H, nigrita. H. discretus. H. pubesce?is. H. planus. H. lifurattis. A z 4 The Irish Naturahsi. [January, Agabus guttatits. Cercyon hamon-hoidalis. Homalota hepatic a. A. paiudosus. C. flavipes. //. xanthoptera. A. ungnicnlaris. C. lateralis. H. trhiotata (var.) A. Jtebtilosus. C. melanoaphalns. H. corvina. A. Shirmii. C uniptinclafus. H. atricohr. A. chalconotus. C. qtnsquilins. H. nigra. A. hipnstulatii^i. C. pygmcBiis, H. gerwana. Ilybius fuhginosHs. C, ana/is. H. atramentaria. /. ater. Mtgasternum boletopha- H. longicornis. Rhantus twtatus. gum. H, sordida. R. bistriatus. Cryptopleurumntovm)h(f)i H. aterrima. Colymbetes fusciis. Akochara fuscipes. H. I at i CO His. Dytisats punctulatus. A, lanughiosa. H. montivigans. D. vtarginalis. A. nicesta. H. fungi. Acilius sulcatus. A. 7utida. var. clienhtla. Gyrimis natator. A. morion. Grypeta labilis. G. elongatus. A. grisea. Tachyusa constricta. G. opaciis. A. algii7-nm. T. flavitarsis (var.) Hydrobius fuscipes. A, obscurella. T. atra. Anacceva globulm. MicrogJossa nidicola. Fa lag ria obscnra. A, limbata. Oxypoda lividipennis. Encephahis complicans. Philydrtis jntlanocephalus 0. opaca. Bolitochara cbliqua. P. coarctatus. 0. umbrata. Phytosus balticns. Laccobins sinnatiis. 0. longhisctda. Oligota in flat a. L. alutacens. 0. hoimorrhoa. Mylicsna dubia. L. 7nziniius. 0. braehyptera. M. brevicoj-nis . Lim neb his trit n catelhts, Gcalca castanea. Gymnusa bj-evicollis. Chtetarth ria sem hi n/inn. Myrniidonia collaris. Hypocyptus ovuluni. Helophorus rngnsus. Astilbiis canaliculatiis. H. scminnlum. H. nubihis. Callicerus obscm-us. Co7ioso7na pubescetis. H. httertncdhis. Hojnaloia cnrro.\. C. lividum. H. aquatiats. H. cambrica. Tachyporus obtusus. H. aeneipennis. H. gregaria. var. 7titidicollis Hs brevicollis. H. fragilis. T. soluttis. H, aivernicus. H. hygrotopora. T chryso7neli7ius. Henicocerus exsculpins. H. volans. T. hu7ne7-o*tis. Octhebhis bicolon. H, vestita. 7. tersus. Hydrana riparia. H, ni/iditla. T. hy pn 07-^1 wt. H. pracilis. H. vicina. T, pusilluft. H. atricapilla. H. graminicohK T. btunneus. H, pulchel/a. H. halobrectha. Tac/iiftus pallipes. Cyclonotum orbiculare. H. pimcticeps. T, rtifipes. Sph(sridhi))i scarabaoiois. H. occulta. T. subterra7ieus. 3. bipustnlahtm. H. fallaciosa. r. laticollis. Cercyon littoralis. H. circellaris. T. elongatus. C. hamorrhous. H. eremita. Megacronus analis. C, obsoUtns. H. analis M, cingulatus. igoo.] BuCKLK. -Beetles of Lough Foyle District. Bolitobitis trtnotatus. Mycetoporus kpidus. M. long nl us. M. nanus. M. clavicorius. M. splendid us. Habrocerns capillaricorn /\\ Heterothops hi not at a. H. dissimilis. Qucdius mesonielin us . Q. puncticollis. Q. cinctus. Q.fulgnosus. Q. tristis Q. molochinua. Q. maiiyorufus. Q. scintillans. Q. rufipes. Q. attenuatus. ' Q. semiceneus. Q. hoops. Staphylinus pubescens. S. ccesarius. S. erythroptenis. Ocypus olens. 0. cupreus. 0. morio. Philonthus spUtidens. P. intermedius. P laminatus, P. cetieus. P. proximus. P. addetidiis. P. carbonarius- P. politus. P. lucens. P. variiis. P. niarginatus. P. uiubratilis. P. cephalotes. P. fanetarius. P. sordidns. P. cbeninus. P. sanguinolcntus. P. longicornis. P. varians. P. ventralis Ph ilonth us q uisqu iliari us • var. dimidiatus. P. nigrita. P. trossulus. P. pud la. Cajius xant/ioloina. Actobius cinerascens. Xantholinus glabratus. X. punctulatus, X. ochtaccus. X. diitans. X linearis Baptolinus alternans. 0th ins fulvipcnnis. 0. licviusculiis. O. niclanoccphalus. O, my I •inccoph ilus. Lathrobiuin clongatuin, L, boreale. L. fulvipenne. L. bninnipcs. L. quadratuin. L. terniinatuni. var. ininiaculatuin. L. nutltipunctatum. Stilicus rujipes. S. orbiculatus. S, affinis, Sunius divcrsus. Stenus Juno. S. speculator. S. btiphthalmus. S. canaliculatus. S. declaratus. S. crassus. var. littoralis. S. brunnipcs. S. ossiuvi. S. impressus. S. pubescens. S. pallitarsis. S. bifoveolaius. S. tempe^tivus. S. picipes. S. similis. S. paganus. Bledius arena?'ius. Bledius longulus. B. erraticus. Platystethus arenarius. Oxytelus rugosus. O. laqueatus. O. niaritimiis. 0. nitidulus. O. complanatus. O. letracarinatus. Haploderus ca'tatus. Ancyrophorus omalinus. Trogophloeus bilineatus. T. rivularis. T.fuligiuosus, T. corticinus. Thinobius linearis. T. longipennis. Lesteva pubescens. L. longelytrata. L. sicula. Acidota crenata. Olophruin piceutv. Lathrlnueuui unicolor. Philorhinuin sordiduin. Coryphiuni angusticoUe, Omaliuni rivulare. 0. ripariu}n. 0, excavatum, 0. CCS sum. 0. pusillum. 0. florale. 0. concinnum, Authobium ?ninutuni. Proteinus ovalis. Megartkrus denticollis. M. depressus. Phlaobium clypeaium Pselaphus Heisei. ■ Tychus niger. Bythinus puncticollis B. bulbper. Bryaxis Heljcri. B. jtmcoruni. Scydmcenus collar-is. Calyptomerus dubius . Clambus sp. Agathidium nigripenne. The Irish NahcralisL [ Jauuar}-, Jgath idiittn luvigaium, Anistotna ovalis. A. calcarata. Necrophorus hitnin/or. N. mortuoniiii. N. riispator. var. niicrocephalits. Xccrodcs littoralis. Silpha opaca. S. rugosa. S.atrata,\Q.r.su(>ro/iiiidii/a Clwlcva agilii. C. cisteloidcs. C./usca. C. viorio. C, g)-andicollis. C. tristris. C. dirysotiieloidcs. C. 1 Vat son I. Ptoinophagus sen'cens. Colon serripcs. C. angidare, C. bvunncum. Hister cadavcrinm. //. negledus. H. biinaculatus, Saprinus nitiduliis. S. ceneus, Ottthophilus striatits. Actidiutn coantatiini. Ptcnidiuni piinctaluiH. Adalia ob Hie rata. Altai is occellata. Coccinclla x-pundata, C. hicroglyphica, C. .xi'puuctata, C. vii-pnindata. Halyzia xiv'guttata. H. xviii-gtittata. //, xxii punctata, Hypcraspis nppensis. Scymniis Rcdcntbachci'i, Rhizobius lit lira, Coccidula riifa, Micropeplns ponatus, M, margaritie. M, tesserula. r^rackyptcnis piibescens, B. nrtidr. Cercus ntfilabris. Epuraa astii'a. E, oblouga, E, longiila. E, florea. E. obsolcta. E. piisilla. E. angiistii/a. JVitidiila hipnstulata, Mcligcthci (tiicits. M, viridesicns. M. picipcs, M. erythropus. Rh izophagits depress us. R.fcrrugiiieus. R. dispar. Monotonia picipcs. Lahcridiiis lat darius, Coninoniiis nodifcr. Enicinus niinutus. E. transversus. Corticaria denticulata. C. clongata, Mcla)iophthalnia gibbosa. Tclniatophilus caricis. . [ntherophagus nigricornis A. pal I ens, Gryptophagus setulosus, C, pilosus. G, saginatus. C, sc aniens, C. dentatus. C, distinguendus, Micrambe vini. Paramtcosoma iiiclanocc- phaluin. A toniaria n igrii 'cu tris, A. IVollastoni. A. fiiscipcs. A. pcltata. A. fuscata. A. pus ilia. A. atricapilla. A, an alts. Ephtsfemus gyriiioldei. Byturus tomentosus. Attagenus pel I to. Byrrhus fasciatus. B. dorsalis, Cytilus varius. Siniplocaria semistriata. El mis Volkmari, E. parallelopipedus. Limnius tuberculattts. Pariius psolifcsicornis. P. aurictilatus. Aphodiiis Jossor. A. finietariiis. A. scybalarius. A. ater. A. COM s tans. A. granarius. ^L. )i it id id us. A. rufesceus, A. lapponiini. A. put rid us. . I. werdarius. A. puncto-sukatus A.prodroniHS. A. containinatus. A rufipes. A. deprcssus. . Egialia arc n aria. Geotrupes stej'corarius. G. sylvaiicits. G, vernalis, Serica brunnca, Mclolontha vulgaris. Phyllopcrtha horticola, Lacon niurintis, Cryptohypnus riparitis. C. dertncstoidcs. var. iv'guttatus. Elatcr pomortim. Athoui niger. .7. hcemorrhoidalis. . Idraitus limbatus, .Igriotcs obscurus. A. lineaius, Dolopius inargiiiatus. Corymbitcs cupreus, var. ivruginosus. 1900.] BucKi^E. — Beetles of Lough Foyle District. ■7 C. icssellatus, C. quercus, var. ochroptcrtis. Dascilhts ccnjinus. Hclodes minuta. H. mai'ginata, Microcara livida. Cypkon coantatus, C. nitidulus. C, variabilis. C, padi. Hydi vcyplion dcjlexicollis, Tclephonis 7iigrica)is, A'ar. discoidens. T. litiiratiis. T. dayivinianus. T. bicohr, T, thoracicus, T. paliidosHS. Rhagonycha fulvc, R. hnibata. R. clongala. Malthodcs inarginaiiis . M. atotniis, Ptinus fur, Ntptus hololeucus, N. crenattis. Priobium castaneiiin, Anobium doinesticum. Ochina hcdcra, Cis boleti. Rhagiiitn inquisilor. R, bi fascial uf/i. Donacia Ihalassina. D. inipressa. D. sericea. D. discolor. Lenia lichen is. L. septcnlrionis ChrysotJiela Banksii. C. staphylea. (J. polita. C. varians. C. fastiiosa. C. hypcrici. Gastroidea viridiila Phicdon tinnidiilus. Pkicdon coclhlari(Z. Hydrothassa marginclla, Prasocuris phelandrii. Lochmcea suluralis. L. san^uinea. Galerucella nyinphau. G. sagittariic. G. lineola. LongitarsHS ater. L. luridus. L. alricillus. L. iiielanoceplialus. L. suluralis ! L. piciceps. L. ballot (B. L. exolelus / L. pus ill us. L. Jacobcea:. L. gracilis. L. pcllucidus. Phyllotreta undulata. P. iicmorum. Apthona nonslriafa. A. atratula. Splucrodermatestaceuni. Aptcropeda orbiculata. A. globosa. Crcpidodcra transversa. C. ferruginca. C. hclxines. Plectroscclis coiuiHiia. Psylliodcs chryso:cphala. var. anglica. P. napi. P. cuprca. P. afjinis. Cassida fiaveola. C. he/nisphcerica. Cistela luperus. Lagria hirta. Salpingus castancus, Rhinosinius viridipcunis. R. planirostris. Naccrdcs inclanura. A naspis frontalis. A. ru^collis. A. viaculata. Anthicus floialis. Meloe proscarabcBus. var. cyaneus. Rhynchites rninutus. Deporaus betulce. Apion cruentatuiu . A. hce mat odes. A. vicice. A.fagi. A. dichroum. A. carduorum. A. virens. A. ei'vi. A. vorax. A, Gyllenhali. A. loti. A. viarchiciim. A. violaceum. A. hydrolapathi. A. humile. Otiorrhynchus atroapterus 0. blandus. O. mazcrus. O. auropunctatus. O. ligneus. O. picipes. O. sulcatus. 0. rugifrons. O. ?nuscoruin. ~ Strophosotmis coryli. Exam las araneiform is. Sciaphilus niuricatus. Tropiphorus obtusus. Liophlceus nubilics. Polydrusus niicans. P. tereticollis. P. pterygomalis P. ccrvinus. Phyllobius oblongus. P. pyri. P. argentatus, P. viridiccris. Philopcdon geminatus, Barynotus obscurus. B. Schonhcrri. B, ehvatiis, Alopkus triguttatus. 8 The Irish NaturalhU [ January, Sitoius ^riscus. S. cavibrkus. S. regens/cifiessis. S. linccUus. S. ineliloti. S. flavescens. S. suturalis. S. linearis. S. iulcifrons. Hypera punctata. H, j-uniicis. //. polygon i. FI. variabilis. H. planfaginis. H. nigrirostris. Liosoma ova/ulinn. Hylobius abietis. Orchestes quercus. 0. Scutellaria. O.fagi. 0. salicis. C/rypidius eqitiseti. Erirrh inus acridulits. Thryogcnes nereis. Dorytomus tortrix. D. macitlatus. D. pectoral is. Anoplus plantar is. A. roboris. Elleschus bipunctatus. Miccotrogus picirostris. Mecinus py raster. AntJwnomus pediculariiis A. rubi. A. coniari. Clonus Iiortulanus. Orobitis cyancus. Acalles ptinoidcs. A. iiirbatiis. Caiiodes riibicundus. C. querctis. Ccuthorrhynch hs contrac - tiis. C. hirtulus. C. quadridens. C. pollinarius. C. viduatus. C. angulosus. C. plctirostigma. C. riigulosus. C. litura. Cciithorrhynchidius troglodytes. Rh inoncus pcricarpius. R. pcrpendictilaris. R. castor. P/iytobins iv-tnbercnlatus. Balan in us salicivorus. B. pyrrhoceras. Rhopalomcsites Tardy i. Hylastes ater. C. iv-!iiaculatus. Ceuthorrhynchus assimilis ^^- palliatus. C. eric(F. Hylastinus obscurus. 'rrypodcndrondomeslicuin. Ill the following- list of the more interesting captures, those which have not been previously recorded from Ireland are marked with an asterisk : — Carabus nitens. --Common on Donegal mountains in May and June, Blethisa multi punctata. — In swamp among rotten rushes. Pterostichus vltreus.— Common under dried turf. Glencaw moun- tain, and at Whitecastle. •Bcmbldlum monticola,— A single specimen under stones, borders of Drung River. B. conclnnum.- River banks, Donegal and Derry; not common, B. affinc— Banks of mountain rivers, under stones ; fairl}- common. Trcchus rubcns. — I'nder turf stack, Glencaw mountain. Hydroporus Davisil. — Common in slack water at foot of mountain rivers in company with //. scpfcntrionalis. (I have never obser\^ed either of these species rise to the surface.) Incognltus. — vSweeping damp grasses, and in swamp, Culmore. mclanarlus.-One .specimen at Downhill, Co. Derry, by Mr. J. N. Milne, cclatus.— Downhill, taken by Mr. J. N. Milne. discrctus.— Common among weeds in early spring in muddy streams or semi-stagnant pools, A^abuB ungrulcularls.— In marsh at Culmore. -H •H *H ♦H I900.] ^vQKUt..— Beetles of Lough Foyle District, 9 Hclophorus rugrosus. -Very abuudant 011 sands at Ma<^illigau and Runcrana, *H. intermcdius.— In marsli at Culmore, not common. H. arvcrnicus. -A single specimen from River Fanglian. '''Henfcocerus exsculptus. — In company with Hydnena, River Fauglian. *HycIraena g^racilis,. H. atrlcapllla, •>. From weed growing on stones, River Fauglian. *H. pulchella, ) Ccrcyon haemorrhous.— Two specimens in Donegal, probably overlooked. *Tachyusa constricta.--On sandy deposit on borders of River F'auglian ; plentiful where it occurs, but very local. *T. flavi tarsus, var. — A new record for Ireland. Bolltochara obllqua.— Abundant under loose bark of fallen fir trees, Kildery, Co. Donegal. Cymnusa brevlcollis. —Plentiful in marsh at Culmore under decompo5jing rushes, &c. : have not met with it elsewhere. *Tachlnus pallfpes. —Occasionally in moss, but attracted in numbers by carrion in woods. Ti elonira'tus. -One specimen on sands at Buncraua. *IVIycetoporus nanus.— Magilligan sand-hills, not common. ^Habrocerus caplllaricornls. — A single specimen m March at base of oat rick. Quedlus sclntellans. - From carrion, not uncommon. Phllonthus lucens. -I have always found this in moss or under stones, never under carrion like P. polifus. P. nlirrlta. — In swamp at Culmore among decaying rushes, &c., and shore of Lough Rnagh, Co. Derry. P. quisqulllarlus.— On sand-hills. Buncrana, Co. Donegal. The var. dimldlatus in swamp at Culmore. Xanthollnus dlstans. -On sand-hills at Magilligan and Buncrana; not uncommon. „. _. ^. /Abundant in sands at Magilligan, the former Bledius erraticus. .. . ^u i,- v, 1 1 ^1 - usually occurs at a rather higher level than B. longulus. [ BJongulHS. Ancyrophorus omallnus.— in mos.sy bank, Culmore. Homalota halobrcctha. —Magilligan sands. "Homalota montivigans, *H. fallaclosa, "^H. hepatica, *Oxypoda haemorrhoa, *0. brachyptcra, *0. Ilvldfpennls, "Thinoblus linearis, j ^Trogrophlosus fullgrinosus, "Troi:ophloeu8 linearis.— Floating on water tub. ^Acidota crenata,— On sandhills at Buncrana; not coramoi^ ' A All new records for Ireland. lo The Irish Natvrali si. [January. Coryphfum angustlcollc. -By sweeping:,' in grass at Culmore. One specimen. "Leptlnus testaceus. — Several examples from tunnel leading to nest of Bom bus terrestris. Xholeva chrysomcloldcs.— In carrion; a single specimen occurred previously at Lough Neagh (Haliday). but was not recorded. Colon serrlpes, \ "C. angrulare, VTaken by sweeping rushes. *C. brunneum, j HIster blmaculatus. — A single example taken floating on River Faugh an, Co. Derry. Actldium coarctatum. — A single example taken under stones. border of Calry River, Co. Donegal. Hyperaspis rcppcnsls. — One at Culmore among dry grass, and another at Kilderry by sweeping grass. IVIIcropeplus tesscrula.— Taken at Culmore, and given to me by Mr. J. N. Milne. "^Epursea angrustula. — Three examples taken from borings of Irypo- dendron doinesticuni in fallen Beech tree, Glentocher. Co. Donegal. *■£. obsoleta. — By beating Ivy, Kilderry. *Anthcrophagus nigricornis. —In nests o{ Boitthus ttrrestris. Cryptophagus setulosus.) In nests of Bomhus terrestris and H. C. dlstingruendus. i agronim. 'Atomaria WoIIastont.— From sweepings of barn after threshing and cleaning oats. *A. peltata. — From base of oat rick. Parnus aurlculatus. — Common under stones near water in early spring. Elater pomorum. — Several taken running up stems of gravsses. one specimen on Birch, Kilderry. *TeIephorus darwinian us. — Ou grassy mounds slightly above high water mark at mouth of mountain rivers on north shore of Lough Foyle, a few examples under dry pieces of sea-weed, chips of wood, &c.. in similar situations. Three examples were sent to me by Mr. J. N. Milne, which were taken on Black Brae emljankment on the south shore of Lough Foyle by sweeping or beating. I find both light and dark varieties plentiful in its favourite localities. It appears towards the end of May. Mr. J. X. Halbert has taken it near Dublin, but it has not been found elsewhere in Ireland. Rhagrlum Inquisitor,— Fairly abundant on Oak and Birch trunks in Walworth Wood, Co Derry, in company with R. bifasciattim. Lema septentrlonls.^ — Plentiful in July on young shoots of oats in compan}- with its larvie. Chryscnriela fastuosa.— Occurs on dend nettle. Mr James Milne gave me a large series which he found floating in an eddy in the Redcastle River, Co. Donegal. ^Longitarsus ballotae. — A single example taken by sweeping grasses in July ; possibly overlooked owing to its resemblance to L, puiillus^ I900 J Buckle. — Beetles of Lough Foyle Distncf. r i Casslcta hemlsphaerica.— One example by beating at Kilderry. *ClsteIa luperus. — A single example in sand-pocket at Magilligan during strong wind. 'IVIeloe proscarabaeus, var. cyancus. -Thirteen examples on a sunny bank in March at Ballyargus. *Rhynchites minutus. — Beating at Culmore. Otiorrhynchus maurus. — One example in Calry Glen, and asecond at Kilderry plantation on grass near the shore ; rare. O. auropunctatuSi — A single example ; underground at foot of oak tree, near a privet hedge, Culmore. O. blandus. — One specimen at Greencastle, Co. Donegal, and two at Magilligan, Co. Derry. *Tropiphorus obtusus.— A single example by sweeping at Kilderry. Polydrusus micans.— Walworth Wood, Co. Derry; found it plentifully on two Hazel bushes, although Hazel is plentiful in the wood it appears to be conlined to these two bushes. Sitones cambricus. — Abundant near the shores of Lough Foyle. *S. melilotl.— By sweeping grasses, Willsborough Level embankment, Co. Derry, one specimen from oat rick, Co. Donegal. Orchestcs scutcllaris. — A large colony on Alder at Culmore. *AnopIus roboris. — Taken when sweeping for Donacnc on wet boggy ground. *Ccuthorrhynchus hirtulus. — Single specimen on sand-hills at Buncrana. C. angulosus. — Sweeping grasses at Culmore, one example onh*. "C. viduatus. Rhopalomesitcs Tardy i.— Common in Donegal and Derry in Holly, Beech, Whitethorn, Willow, &c. Trypodcndron domcsticum.— A small colony in a fallen Beech tree in valley of Glentocher, Co. Donegal. I cannot conclude this list of Donegal and Derry Beetles without expressing my warmest thanks to Mr. J. N. HalbertS for the immense amount of trouble which he has taken in naming and verifying beetles for me, and for the many useful hints as to collecting which I have received from him during the past three years. My thanks are also due to Mr. James N. Milne, of Culmore, who, dtiring his fishing and shell-hunting excursions, so frequently collected and sent to me large numbers of beetles, among which were several rarities. Chichester. n Dr. David Sharp, F.R.vS., and Mr. G. C. Champion, F.Z.S., have very kindly named or verified many of Mr. Buckle's captures, especially in the family Staphylinidcc, submitted to them during the last three years. J. N. Hai:,be;rt.] 12 The Irish Natnralht. [Jamian-, KNTOMOSTRACA FROM I^OUGH RKK. BY W. 1'. DK V. KANE, M.A., F.E.S. [Collected on the Ivx:ursioii of the Dublin Naturalists' l''ieldClub, 1899. i Thk following resiiits were obtained from about an hour's dredging in one portion of I^. Ree, and chiefly in deep water. Only the most interesting captures are given. Several specimens of Bythotrcphes hngimaniis, Lilljeborg, and Lepto- dora hyalhia, I,illjeborg, occtirred ; these two remarkable species frequent large lakes. Dr. Creighton has met w^itli the former in L. Melvin, and the latter near Galway. When the Athlone party broke up I proceeded to Mayo, and in L. Mask met with both, but at L- Carra only Lepfodora hyalina. Both also occur at L- Gill, Sligo, and L. Neagh- In L. Erne the latter is found and a species of Bythofrcphcs, probably B. borcalis, Sars., not hitherto taken in the British Islands. Daphnia /aciistris, var. ga/cata. Sars., occurs plentifully in moderately deep water at L. Ree. The prevalent form i^ a most remarkable one and well worth figuring. The helmet-shaped head assumes the most grotesque forms, the beak being extremely prominent, a ver}' convex projection in front of the eye, and the vertex spine long and sometimes curved forward into a hook-shape. When alive, the animals are remarkable for a vers' dark pigmentation about the head and the abdomen, which gives them a ver}- speckled appearance in the water, 'llic specimens figured by Prof. Brady in his monograph on British Daphnia published last year, from L. Oich and L. Attray, Scotland, are suggestive of those which I took at I,. Ree, btit are not in any way so grotesque. It is interesting also that I found the same species in L. /uask in extraordinar\- ntimbers, and of exactl}- similar character to those of L. Ree. I have taken D. galeata, Scourfield, also in L. Gill and in certain minor lakes in the County of Monaghan where tlie> occur in scanty numl^ers accompanied by D. longispina and other common species? but presenting in every instance onl}^ the ordinar}- typical characters. The immature specimtrus taken at L. Ree and L. Mask are extremeh' variable, but not more so than is usual elsewhere, so far as I have examined. It is worth}' of noting that this species, widely distributed in the lakes of Ireland and Great Britain, appears on the Continent to be t9^.J ICane- — E)itomostyaca from Lough Ree. 13 confined to Scandinavia, according 10 Brady. Thti excessive local variation which seems to obtain m this and allied species presents a problem well worthy of further research. The only other capture worth noting was Sida crystallhia which was plentiful among weeds at St. John's Point. The material, however, has been so far only cursorily examined, and there may be minute species yet overlooked worthy of record. An attempt was made to collect in a very shallow lake near Clonmacnois, but owing to the boat having but one oar it was impossible to reach the deeper water, and Eurycaus lanuilatus was almost the onh^ species taken. Drumrearke, Monaghaii, A COUNTY FAUNA. Contributions towards a Fauna of Herefordshire— IVlollusca. By Arthur E. Boycott and Ernest W. \V. Bowki^i.. U'oolhope Natuyalists^ Field Club. Pp. 104, n.d. Messrs. Boycott and Bowell's " contribution " is certainly the best paper on a count}' fauna we have yet seen. In many respects it even represents an ideal to be imitated by naturalists of other counties, and we strongly recommend its perusal to those intending to issue similar publications. Instead of the usual list of species, with long strings of Latin names indiscriminately ajDplied to monstrosities as well as to individual varia- tions in size, the authors give us carefully compiled lists of distribution of the species with regard to the principal geological strata, and they also take into consideration the anatomy and histology of the animals which the}- enumerate. There are some points, however, in which this little work might have been improved. Though it is acknowledged that the slugs have been practically left out. no reason is given for this singular omission. The chief defect, however, lies, in our opinion, in the nomenclature, which is almost bewildering in its novelty. After committing themselves to this statement (p. 21,)- '• Indeed, the more the mitter is inquired into, the further one is driven from one's ideal of strict correctness and priority to the view that the best name is the one to which 25Cople are most accustomed and about the significance of which there is not much doubt '" we find our familiar HyaJiin'a ciystallina described as Discus crystallinus, Hcli.x rotundata as Pyramidiila rotundata, whilst our poor garden snail, Helix aspersa^ becomes Cryptomphalusaspersus. To resuscitate such names as Discus, Cryptoinphalus. Ainphibulina, and Thcodaxtis ^^^Mv?, to us objectionable and not even always in accordance with any rules of priority. It is a great pity that no reference is given on the paper as to the method and date of its original publication. R.F.S 14 The Irish Naturalist. [January, THE PAI^^ONTOGRAPHICAI. SOCIETY IN IRELAND. lYIonoerraph of the Carboniferous Cephalopoda of Ireland. By Arthur II. Foord, Ph.D. (Munch.), F.G.S. Part i. Family Orthoceratidic {\\\ Part), pp. i-22 ; pis. i.-vii., 1897. Part ii. Containing the laniilies Orthoccratidic (concluding part), Actinoceratidie^ Cyrto- icratidce, and Pott'riocc'ratidti\\>-^. 23-48 ; pis. viii.-xvii., 1898. Palseonto- graphical Society. In view of the possibility of establishing life-zones in the Carboniferous rocks it is necessary that the organic remains should be minutely described and accurately figured. Everyone specially interested in these rocks has felt the want of satisfactory figures and descriptions of the Cephalopoda and will therefore, we are sure, heartily welcome Dr. Fooid's Monograph, which is appearing in the publications of the Pala;ontographical vSociety. Having previously worked through all the Nautiloidea in the British Museum collection, which contains a number of Sowerby's and of Phillips's type-specimens, Dr. Foord was eminently fitted to undertake such a Monograph. The two parts which have already appeared include the straight or only slightly curved Nautiloids, viz., Orthoccras. Acdnoccras^ Cyrtoccras.Wx^ new genus Eusthe}ioceras,^n(\. Potcrio- cents. The importance of the work will beat once apparent when it is stated that of the twenty-seven species of Orlhoceras that are described, twenty are due to the author's researches, and are here figured for the first time in the admirable manner so characteristic of the publications of the Palseontographical Societ}-. The differentiation of these comparatively straight forms is particularly difficult owing to the paucity of the specific characters, these being chiefl3-the rate of tapering, the shape of the transverse section, the form of the septa, the position and character of the siphuncle, and the nature of the ornaments of the test. New species of Aiti'noceras^ of Cyrtoceras, and of Fofcrioicras are also described and figured. F'or the species from Oldtown, Queen's County, that De Koninck figured and described under the name Cyrtoceras Hitlli. J)r. Foord proposes the new genus Eusthcnoceras^ a genus possessing characters which are inter- mediate between those of Ort/wccras, and those of Me/oceras, a subgenus of Cyrtoceras. Apparently the species is not very rare, and according to the author " the great size of the individuals belonging to this species is worthy of note, and did not escape De Koninck's attention in his descrip- tion of the species. There were giants in those days in the Carboniferous seas of the British and Belgian areas ; this may at least be said of the Cephalopoda, for not onh' did Actinoceras gigantetim flourish and abound, but there were also gigantic forms of many of the coiled shells . . . Favourable environments, immunity from the attacks of their enemies, and other physical conditions may be invoked to account for such unusual development whicli was most marked in the Irish area. ' Although departing in same particulars from E, HuI//\ Dr. I'oord places provisionally in this genus the unique specimen from Samphire Island, in the County of Kerry, that De Koninck described as Cyrtoceras Bailyi. We heartily I900.] Carboniferous Cephalopoda. 15 congratulate the author on the result of hivS researches so far as he has made them known, snd we look forward with interest to the rest of his Monograph dealing with the many interesting coiled Cephalopoda — both NautiloideaandAmmonoidea — that have been found in the Carboniferous Limestone of Ireland. Org. C. Crick British Museum (Natural History), London. PROCEEDINGS OF IRISH SOCIETIES. ROYAl. ZOOr.OGICAI. SOCIRTY. Recent gilts include a Barbary Sheep from the Marquis of Hamilton, a Herring Gull from Mr. H. C. Hartnell. an Otter from Mr. C. Boyle, a number of Rudd from Mr. F. Godden. a Baboon from Captain Warren, a Giant Tortoise from the Hon. Walter Rothschild, a Sloth Bear from Mr. S. T. Loftus, eleven Tortoises from Mr. A. E. Jamrach, and a Dotterel from Mr. J. H. O'Connell. 5,527 persons visited the Gardens in November. Dubinin Microscopicai, CIvUb. November 16 — The Club met at Leinster House. Mr. G. H. CarprnTP^R showed hotoiua brevicauda, a new species of springtail from P'ranz-Josef Land. This interesting form will be shortly described and figured in the Scientific Proceediugs of the Royal Dublin vSociety. Dr. He:nrv H. Dixon exhibited coccospheres. These minute organisms, the probable source of coccoliths, were found during last summer in Valentia Harbour. It is remarkable that while coccoliths are very abundant all round our coasts, coccospheres are extremely scarce— so far, some half dozen only have been recorded by Dr. J. Joly and the exhibitor from Weymouth and Dublin Bay. Mr. M'Ardi^E exhibited specimens of L'^pidozia Pearsoni, vSpruce, bear- ing the male spikes. The specimens were found by himself and the Rev. Canon Lett at Lough Duff, in the Brandon Valley, Co. Kerry, last May, when collecting for the R.I. A. Flora and Fauna Committee. The species resembles the pretty Lepidozia reptans. but has not the deep green colour of that species. It is of a pale tawny green, more slender and more elongated in growth, with more distantly placed leaves ; which are cloven to beyond the middle into four to six subulate segments. The chief dis- tinction is in the dioecious inflorescence the male t.pikes are terminal on the lateral branches. Lepidozia reptans is monoecious, the male spike springing from the underside of the stem— which is the normal position on nearly every other Eulepidozia known to us, except Lepidozia Pearsoni. This is the first record of the plant being found in Ireland. In North Wales it was collected by W. H. Pearson, at Tyn-y-groes, near Dolgelly, in 1877 and 1879. He has kindly verified the naming of this rare hepatic, l6 The Irish Naturalist. f January, Mr. Henry j. Sevmoi'k showed a imnibcr otj^old specks obtained In- washing alluvial sands in Co. Wicklo^v. One of the samples examined, a few ounces in weight, yielded about 15 specks ot gold. The second sample was not so auriferous, but the specks were considerably larger. Bei,fast Naturalists' Firi.d Club. NovRMBRR i^^. — Mr. F. J. Bigger, M.R.I. A , occupied the chair. A discussion took place with reference to scientific and other objects exhibited, including some excellent bronze implemetits lately added to Mr. Milligan*s collection from Lough Erne, &c. After the election of some new members, Prof A. C. Haddon delivered a very interesting lecture on " Our Papuan P'ellow-subjects at Work and Play," which was a descriptive account from personal observation of a stage of culture such as no doubt prevailed in Ireland before the introduction of Christianity. The lecturer dealt with the work of men and women and the games of children, as well as the physical features of the country and the towns and villages, including Port Moresby, the capital of British New Guinea. The manufacture of native pottery by women was ver}- fully illustrated. This is altogether hand-made without a wheel, the result being very similar to the remains of ancient pottery dug from Irish graves and sand-dune settlements, such as we have in our Gramger collection. The lecturer also illustrated and described the making of native canoes from logs of wood, dug out with stone implements and the action of fire, such as was probably the origin of the dug-out boats in the Benn collection of the Natural Histor}' Museum, Belfast. Onr crannoges, or artificial islands, so common in Irish lakes, were illustrated by the native pile dwellings that occur along the coasts at Bulaa and elsewhere. The construction of these villages was described in an interesting manner, and demonstrated the correctness of the accepted theories as to the origin of our ancient Irish crannoges. The process of making fire by the friction of pieces of wood was shown, and the method of tattooing as practisedjby the women. A number of games of Motee children were illustrated, such as cat's cradle, leapfrog, tug-of-war, and several that have no British equivalents. The natives of these distant islands attribute to supernatural agency or to the mighty deeds of their legendary heroes all special natural features in the landscape, such as rocks, mountains, etc., and the legends are carefully preserved and recited, as is common in Ireland still in remote places. Native shrines were shown, which are erected to secure success in fishing and cultiva- tion of crops of fruit. At these shrines the natives' offerings are typically represented : for example, a basket of fruit is represented by a large shell holding a few stones. As in Ireland, upright stones of memorial frequently occur. Mr. Bigger, chairman, Messrs. Wright, Gray, and Patterson, discussed the merits of the lecture, referring to its many subjects of comparison with Irish customs in ancient times, and, on the motion of Mr. Wright, F.G.S., a very cordial vote of thanks was passed to Professor Haddon. tgoo/] Proceedings of Irish Societies. i w Nov. 21 —The President (Rev. C. H. Waddeli., B.D.) delivered a very interesting lecture on 'The Work of the Club.' After some introductory remarks, Mr. Waddet.i. stated that the object of a Field Club was to pro- mote a study of nature among its members, to popularise such pursuits among the community and gain new disciples, and work out in detail the natural history of the district, placing the results on permanent record. Their Club was the oldest in Ireland, and they had no reason to be ashamed of the work already accomplished. The guide published in 1S74 for the visit of the British Association summed up in an interesting manner what had been done up to that time. There were still, however, many gaps in the records of the natural surve}' of their district which should be filled up. The progress of science in all departments had been so great that it had become necessary for anyone who wished thoroughl}- to investigate anj' branch to become a specialist. For this reason, and also from the improvement in instruments of research, the older race of field naturalist was passing awaj-. Our old naturalists of Belfast were " all-round men," such as Robert Patterson, who had done so much to promote natural history; John Templeton, of Cranmore, who set about the immense task of writing a complete natural history of Ireland ; and William Thompson, who formed the same project for zoology alone, and carried it out to a great extent before his death. The ranks of this old tj'pe of naturalist should be filled up from the mem- bers of the Club. The attraction of work in laboratories and herbaria indoors, and the influence of the subjects taught now in our universities — structure, physiology, and microscopic work — were telling against work in the field. We need more life-histories of plants and animals, more monographs of single species or individuals, than monographs of groups and classes. There is work to be done on these lines of permanent interest and importance which cannot be done in the laboratory alone, but must be undertaken by the field naturalist. All that is required is, first, choice of a subject, then patience, observation, and the power to properly recording results. The true object of our favoured pursuits is not merely to collect specimens, but knowledge, to try to understand some- thing of the varied and prolific life with which this world is filled, to study its origin, modes of development, and meaning. The members should remember the traditions of the Field Club and endeavour to ex- tend its usefulness. The Society had always been a centre of progress and education in Belfast in all that relates to the love of nature, and the pursuit of those humanising and elevating studies which lead us to wonder even more and more at the greatness and goodness of the Creator. In conclusion, he said — I\Iay we seek then, in our communion with nature to be always learning at her feet, and to drink of her spirit, her infinite patience and calmness to soothe the impatience and restlessness of ours, her prodigality and kindness to give generosity to ours, her widespread beauty kindling into flame the admiration, wonder, and reverence of our spirits to ennoble and refine them. A very animated discussion followed. Several^ members expressed a strong desire to have the lecture published. The possibility of rendering the Club's collection of books available for use was referred to. 1 8 The Irish Naturalist - [January-, aud the debirability of having a set of the orduauce maps, geological maps, and geological memoirs provided for reference in the Public Library. As a free grant of these valuable documents could be had from the Treasury, no further time should be lost in securing them. The want of proper arrangement in the Public Museum was considered to be a very serious loss to popular education. It was thought desirable that the services of the members of the Club should be utilised in completing aud arranging our local natural history and antiquarian collections. The meeting was closed by the election of some new members. XovKMBKR 25. BoT.\NiCAi, SECTION.— The first meeting was well attended. After some notes on grasses collected during the season, Rev. C. H. Waddell gave an introductory lectnre on the Cyperacese, the special subject chosen for study by the members of the section during the winter meetings. ReIvI'ast Natural History and Phii.osophicai, Society. December 5.— a lecture was given by Robert A. Mitcheix, iora, Meuispora ciiiata, and .Etka/iiim septiLiim. Ground beetles were abundant on Hare Island, though referable to but few species ; the following occurred under stones on the lake shore : — Elaphrus ciipreits, Cludlnius vestUiis^ Auchoincniis albipes abundant ; .-/ inarginatus, A. vidiiiis var. i/iastits, xtvy common, no specimens of the bronze-coloured type form of this species were observed : less common were A,riifesiens, Ptcrosfick^is vernalis, Harpalta nifibarbU^ Bembidiiijii ni/cscens, B. atrocceruleum, and Bradycdliis distinctiis. In the weed-grown inlet at the landing-place, the following water-beetles were noted in company with many commoner kinds; — Ccclambus v.-lineatiis, Dcronectes\ assimjlisy D. dcpi-essus. Hydroporns lineatus, and //. timbrosiis. Numerous examples of Orectochilus villosus, and a few of the rare beetle Philonthtis quisquUia)-iits, were disturbed from under stones at the water-edge. By sweeping, the following wei;e found more or less commonly on the island •.—Tclcplwrus thoracicus, Graminoptera ru/icorfiis, vars'ing greatly in size : Phyllodtcta vitellince, Galcrucella nyinphaw, G. lineola, G. fend/ a, and Brachyso/niis echinatus. Mr. Dillon found a beautifully fresh specimen of the local longicorn Rhagiuni iiiquisUoy, along with the wood-boring beetle Sinodendron cylindriciun iu an old tree stump, and Mr, Cuthbert got Rhopalomesitcs Tardy I in Alder, an unusual home for this weevil. On Inchcleraun Mr. Cuthbert collected three species of beetles of great interest, on account of their occurrence at such an inland locality ; these are : — Aleochara obsciirella, P/iylosus baltuus, SlwA Siio)ies griscus. Up to this they had only been detected on the sea-coast. Philonthus cephalolcs, Bkdiiis opaciis, and Orchestes saiicis are also noteworthy from this locality, being somewhat local species. Ou Priest's Island the most interesting captures were Gyropha-na hvvipcfinis, common in fungi ; Halyzia conglobafa, E/urca dcleta, Aiiobiuiii strialiim^ Elinis ]'o!k?nan, Chrysoiiicla hypericin and several specimens of the rare weevil Miaris campanuloi were swept off flowers, this being the second Irish record for this species. Some interesting insects were found on the bog and meadow lands about Clonmacnoise, notably the following species of beetles : — Euconnus hirticallis^ Corticaria fcnestralis^ Chihcoris bposttilatiis^ Lci/ia scptentrionalis, Haltica ericcti, Phacdon cochlcaria^ Doiiacia imprcssa, swept commonly off reedson th e Shannon bank ; Eiibrychiiis velatiis and LUhodactylia teucogaskr in weedy drains ; Phytobins couiari^ Miaris cainpanulac^ &c. The stony shores of Fin Lough yielded three rather local rove-beetles i.e. Lathrobiiifu inuUipiinctatiiin, L. terniinatufn, type form, and Z. longulidn. Perhaps the most interesting insect captured near Clonmacnoise was a caterpillar of the rare noctuid moth Dasypolia le//ipli. taken by INIr. Dillon and identified by Mr. Kane. The Hymenopterous faunawas disappointingly scanty, owing principally to the broken weather. Prosopis /lyalitiata, one of the short-tongued bees of a genus very poorly represented in Ireland, was taken on Quaker Island 20 The Irish Naturalist. [ January, by Mr. Dillon. It is probably not uncommon, but hitherto hud not been definitely recorded. I^i'thyms barlmtelius, an inquiline humble-bee, was taken on Hare Island, with the solitary species Halictus albipes, 11. villo- suius, and Sphaodes similis. I'ormicafttsca was abundant on Hare and Quaker Islands, as also the races rugiiiodis and scabrinodis of Myrmica rubra. Some solitary wasps, including Psen pallipcs, Pcniphrcdon Wesmocli^ Crabro variiis, and Crabro leiicostontay were taken under bark along the west bank of the river, south of Athlone. Among the more interesting spiders collected were Lycosa Icopardus, abundant on the islands of Lough Ree, ixi\(\. Prosthesima lutcliana^ of which a single female occurred on Hare Island. The latter is the first addition to Mr. G. H. Carpenter's list of Irish Spiders published in the Prcc, R.I. A. (3), vol. v., 1898, pp, 128-210. A Report on the Entomostraca dredged during the excursion by Mr. Kane will be found on pp. 12-13 of this number. The result of shell-hunting was a list of 44 species. Of these the most interesting were the large Claiisilia laminata, of which a few were found iu the woods on Hare Island, and Hyalinia] nitida, which was very numerous round the shore of the same place. Fossil-hunting was rewarded by the discovery of several forms which have been named by Dr. A, H. Foord. The species are represented mostly by immature specimens : — Brachiopoda. — Spirifera glabra, Martin ; .V. bisitlcala, vSowerby ; Orthis resupinata, Martin ; Terebratula hastata^ Sowerby ; Rhynconella cordi- for mis {!), Sowerby; Productus sp. LamEI.I or Stokes, seem to me much easier to master. I will now make some remarks on passages in this volume, in the order in which they occur. On page xxvi. is omitted '' Donegal Plants," y(??^;7^. of Dot., 1896, p. 399, under *' Hart, H.C.," a paper which is referred to subsequently several times. At page xl. it is contended that the rainfall in Kerry is at a maximum, Valentia being quoted in proof for six j^ears (1890- 1895), an insufiicient period, with a mean of 53*6 inches. Dunmanway, in Cork, has a wetter mean, 66*23 inches. But what I wish to observe is that Connemara is, so far as our knowledge goes, far and away wetter than the south-west (unless at altitudes unsuitable for comparison). K3'lemore, in Connemara, has a mean of 8179 inches for 16 j^ears. Symons' British Rainfall is of course the authority on such subjects. No doubt there are valleys in the Kerry Reeks, that would perhaps eclipse Connemara, but we have not got the proof. Indeed the mean at Killj'begs, in Donegal, for nine years, exceeds the Valentia record quoted above by about four inches. On the following page (xli.) the first British type plant quoted as absent from Ireland is Helia7itheniu7n viilgare. This I believe to be a misstatement. I will refer to the question later on. In enumerating the Highland type plants (p. xliv.), it seems a pity to exclude such thoroughly representative plants, sub- igoo.] Hart. — Remaiks on Cybcle Hibernica. 29 speciCvS thougli the}- be, as Aira alpina, Cochlcafia alpina, Saxifraga hirta and 6'. groenlandica- These are confined to and most characteristic of our scattered mountain-groups, and are clearly remnants of an ancient flora. Why should our mountains be deprived of the credit thereof? On the following page (xlv.) there is a list of the plants of this group which descend in Ireland to, or almost to, sea level. This is a very imperfect list. It should contain also Saxifraga oppositifolia, Arctostaphyllos Uva-ursi, Isoetes laatstris and Carex aqicatilis. These all descend to sea-level in several places in Donegal, and the last three elsewhere in Ireland. These facts I have recorded in a paper on altitudes^ which has been largeh' made use of, I am pleased to observe, in this volume— all except Carex aqicatilis, which was not then known as an Irish plant. And these facts are duly recorded in their proper place under the plants themselves in the bod}' of the work. To these maj^ also be added several of the Donegal Hieracia. Carex aqiiatilis is found onh' at low levels. At Doochar}' Bridge, in Donegal, two forms of this sedge are almost, if not quite, within the influence of exceptionally high tide. In the list of Scottish (and Intermediate) type plants (p. xlvi.), there should be included several Hieracia. H. Schmidtii is of this type, according to the editors' subsequent classification. This genus is especially well represented in West Donegal over a district extending Irom Sheephaven to Donegal Bay. Several of them occur along the rivers at low levels, and they especially predominate (as at Carrick) in the lowest reaches along the immediate banks or margin of the water, giving one far more the impression of, and associating with, Scottish tj'pe rather than Highland type plants. In this list of Scottish type, an asterisk plant like Myrrhis odorata is out of place. It is certainly not a native. From the Atlantic type list (p. xlvii.), two very important plants are omitted ; the Irish Spurge and the Killarney Fern. Nor can I find them claSvSified in any of these preliminaiy analyses. Both are subsequentl}" classified as Atlantic. The latter of these two was similarly unaccountably omitted in the original edition. "• On the Range of Flowering-plants and Ferns on the Mountains of Ireland. Proc. R.I. A. (3), vol. i., pp. 512-570. 3o The Irish Nahi7'alist. [February, On page 1. we come to a real casus belli, the question as to whether our most tender species have existed throughout the Glacial Period in Ireland. I, for one, have always given this question an unhesitating "no,'' viewing it as a matter of practical experience, rather than a question to be decided by geological theories. However, the argument goes merrily along. It would be well to submit it to arbitration, or to take a vote upon the question amongst those competent to form an opinion, the minority to abide (outwardly at least) by the decision of the majority. Those who have botanized in the Arctic Regions, and also among the " Cantabrian Group" {^Saxifraga iivibrosa, S. Gaivi, Arbichis Uncdo, Pinoidcnla g7-a7idi flora, Dabcocia polifolia, Erica 77ieditcrra7ica, E. Mackaii), especially practical horticulturists, will, I imagine, vote mostly in the negative. It is not necessary to limit the consideration of this subject to those few species (seven) of the so-called Cantabrian Group (p. xlviii.), whose chief peculiarity, as distinguished from several more, is the accidental one that they do not now exist in the neighbouring island. It is most probable they did, when they and their congeners throve in a climate that suited them far better (or at least allowed them a wider range) than the present climate does. Who can doubt, on meeting a stra}^ dwarfed patch of Killarney Fern in Donegal, or an outlying settlement of Iri.sh Spurge or Bartsia viscosa in the same county, but that these were at one time portions of a connected chain ? And this Cantabrian Group is the still more reduced remainder of a widespread flora. No matter how the arrival of these plants be explained, it seems to me a sheer impossibilit}^ to suppose such organisms as these could have withstood so rigorous a condition of things. The Killarney Fern can, ranging as it does to Sierra I^eone, stand great extremes of temperature, but its limit at the cold end of the range is reached here, or in the similarly-climated west of Scotland. I find more difficulty in establishing it in the open than any of its western neighbours that I have experimented upon. The Irish Spurge, I^arge-flowered Butterwort, and Mediterranean and Connemara Heaths will make themselves at home in Donegal without cultivation. Therefore I take this fern as a chief stumbling block to the Pre-glacial theory. A7b2ihis U7iedo\s another which has reached its limit of climatic I900.] Hart. — Remarks on Cybcle Hibcmica. 31 severity. One of the Cantabrian seven is quite out of place in the group, so far as vertical distribution goes. I mean London Pride, which seems to be able to exist amongst alpines, stand anything in fact. In Donegal its range is Highland. Sir Charles Lyell says " the signs of glacial action have been traced b}^ Professor Jukes to elevations of 2,500 feet in the Killarney district— the whole island was, in some part of the Glacial Period, an archipelago." — {Antiquity of Man, p. 271). Let us question one or two more authorities before we leave this debatable question, which it was almost a pity to raise at all in the Cybele. Professor James Geikie says " with glacial conditions in Scotland and the hilly grounds of England and Ireland, neither temperate flora nor fauna could have existed in this country." — (On' Changes of climate during the Glacial Epoch ; Gcol. Magazine, vol. ix., r872). This question is akin to others in various parts of Europe, man}^ of which can be explained b}^ the, I believe, admittedly reasonable supposition, if not demonstration, of an upheaval (consequent upon the removal of the superincumbent mass of ice) of the continents accompanying the warmer period which caused that removal. Kerner sa3^s "The most noteworthy inference made in this connection is that over a great part of Central Europe since the last ice-age, a flora was evolved which was onh^ capable of existing under the influence of a continental climate of far greater warmth than now prevails." {Natural History of Plants, ii., 903). It is, I believe, an admitted fact amongst geologivSts, that at the deposition of the Estuarine Clay, long subsequent to the close of the Glacial Period, a fauna prevailed along our coasts of a milder form and more southern aspect than that now existing. The flora of the Dead Sea, another warm group, detached by many degrees from its natural home, and incapable of existing there when Syria was glaciated and the Jordan an icy stream, is a case of similar origin. In a recent and elaborate paper by Dr. Scharff" {Proc. Roy. Ir. Acad., July, 1897), " On the Origin of the European Fauna," the author labours hard to substantiate the Pre-glacial theory. Many of his arguments appear to me to be built upon insufli- A3 32 The Irish Naturalist. [February, ciently matured and established theories, derived from continental palaeontology. Others of his views are hardly tenable, as for instance where he supports his theory of the lines of ancient arrival of our boreal species to Ireland by the following remark : — " The northern animals and plants un- doubtedly came across from Scotland, and in the County of Londonderry, which part of modern Ireland they first touched, they are still more common than in any other portion of the countr}' " (p. 440, d siipra). The last portion of this statement is unfortunately quite erroneous so far as plants are concerned. In my Flora of Donegal I show that Derry has eight Highland, Scottish and Intermediate type plants not in Donegal ; while Donegal has eighteen (omitting Hieraeia) not in Derr3^ And Derr}' would suffer perhaps equall}'- by a comparison with Antrim. It is true that this is not a vital part of the argument, but so far as I can gauge the intention, it is supposed to have some effect. I do not think the editors of the Cybele have materially benefited their cause. On page xlv., when .speaking of our most ancient flora (as I believe it to be), that of the Highland t3-pe, it is remarked that it may be regarded as having maintained itself " chiefly along the western Atlantic sea- board, where the climatic conditions were probably most favourable during the last Glacial Period." This is a reason- able assumption and may be correct, although I think it is safer to suppose they followed the retreating ice from the more southern latitudes, or the mountains of those latitudes, to which they had been banished. But it is an accurate idea, and is exactly what the very same species are doing at present in North Greenland, along its coasts. But when we find on page 2 (speaking of the Cantabrian Group), of " their survival in Ireland . . . throughout the Glacial Period ... in some favoured spots along our western seaboard," one begins to contemplate the assemblage of forms in these favoured spots with the keenest interest and wonderment. Here we have the very hardiest and the most delicate members of our flora occupying identical situations, say at the foot of the glacier or along the inner margin of the ice-foot, with the most reckless disregard for their natural requirements. The question becomes hopelessly involved when regarded from the geological point of view. It is better to let the plants 1900.] Hart. — Remarks on Cybelc Hibonica, ^iZ speak for themselves in the first instance. They know, and the}' will tell no lies. Consequently it is our business to harmonize our geological theories with the truth, and not to distort the evidence of our senses so as to fit it into some formula which is largely hypothetical perhaps, and which should at once give wa}^ to the incontrovertible laws of nature. The above condition of things does not occur in North Green land, nor would it, I imagine, be easy to produce a parallel. On page Iv. and Ivi. two interesting lists are given of western plants, not found east of Long. 8''' W. ; and of eastern plants, not found west of Long. 7^' W. To the former of those may be added Allmni Babingtonii^ east of Long. 8'^' (in Donegal); and to the latter ma}^ be added the following from Donegal localities which were not known to the authors : — Thalictimm diinensCy Hieracmni striclum, H. anratiun, H. corymboszun Myosotis collina, and Eqtiisctnm Moorci (which many hold as inseparable from E. tracliyodon, which occurs in the west). On the same page (Ivi.) several Donegal Hawkweeds ma}^ be added to the '' northern plants." I omitted to call attention to another sad conclusion on pages xxxix.-xl. ; the great god Pan is dead ! The Gulf Stream is no more. Our valued friend is taken from us, and we receive nothing but vapour in exchange for the loss. This is the decision of the ^' best authorities." But I find the tradition lingering along in great force in Dr. Murray's articles, " Atlantic " and " Gulf Stream," in Chambers' Encyclopcedia, 1890, and I have just read with keen delight the paper on "Oceanography of the North Atlantic," communicated to the Geographical Jo2irnal (^OY^mhe^Y, 1898) by that enthusiastic oceanographer, the Prince of Monaco. He still believes in the Gulf Stream, and recently, in another communication of his, he did Donegal the honour to place its course (that of the stream) in closer juxtaposition to it than to any other part of Ireland, a conclusion he arrived at by his elaborate and costly scheme of Atlantic floats. Further north it impinges closely upon the Scottish Hebrides. His words are "This vortex begins towards the Antilles and Central America with the Gulf Stream, which issues from the Gulf of Mexico, and with the equatorial current ; passing the banks of Newfoundland at a tangent, it turns to the east, approaches the European coasts, and runs southwards from the Channel to Gibraltar. A wide branch 34 The Irish Naiiiialist. [Fel^ruary, runs along the wCvStern coast of Ireland and of Norway, as far, at least, as Cape North. The centre oscillates somewhere to the south-west of the Azores." This is the conclusion of the latest of one of the "best authorities." On pageslxviii.jlxix., we read of DistrictXII. (Antrim, Down, and Derry,) "though by its position not on the whole so northern as District XI. [Donegal], the flora of this district has perhaps a more northern character. It has, indeed, but 29 Highland type plants to 30 in Donegal ; but this deficiency is counterbalanced by the greater number of its Hia'acmm species and forms, and of its Scottish and Intermediate t3'pe plants, which ma}' be taken as repre- senting the boreal element in our flora. Out of a total for all Ireland of 29 species and forms of Hicrachnn^ District XII. has 26 against 15 in Donegal, while the number of the Scottish and Intermediate type plants taken together is 49 in XII , to 43 in XI., out of a total of 60 for all Ireland." These statements are erroneous, as examination of my Flora of Do7iegal will show. There are eleven northern Hawk weeds in Donegal which do not occur in the north-east, while the north- east can claim only five northern forms absent from Donegal. The absence of Hicrachmi 7nuror2ivi and H. boreale forms from Donegal is quite in accordance with their non-northern character. Donegal, in fact, is an easy winner in northern Hicracia, so the argument on page Ixix. may be transferred to the other side. H.prenanthoides (if it has been correctly deter- mined) is the only important absentee from Donegal. It is to be hoped the herbarium specimens of the earlier Hieracia records have been submitted to recent experts, other- wise it is a misfortune that so many of them have been ad- mitted to the Cybele ; and it would seem probable that identical forms appear under different names. So far as my species and forms go, I have adopted the Hieracia of the London Catalogiie (ninth edition.)^ ■• There is one serious objection to linjiting British Hawkweeds to Sir J. Hooker's classification. Since that was issued an industrious band of botanists have worked out districts in Scotland (to say nothing of Ireland and Kngland), which were wholly unexplored. The result has been that many forms unknown to occur in these islands, new forms and con- tinental forms, have come to light. Is our flora to be excluded from the benefit of these ? 1900.] Hart. — Remarks 07i Cyhele Hibcniica. 35 Beforeleaving the subject of the headquarters of boreal groups of plants in Ireland, I have a few more words to say. Even though there be a superiority^ in species in the Scottish group in the north-east, the superiority is often the other way in the abundance of individuals, which is a surer criterion, perhaps, than scattered remnants of a failing or at any rate a rare flora. This would apply to Primus Padus, w^hich the editors represent as *' apparently decreasing" ; it is locally common in Donegal, even abundant in several places ; to Ligustiaiyn scoticum^ much commoner from Inishowen to Dunfanaghy ; to Lobelia Dortviaima, " apparently decreasing" in the north-east ; to Carex limosa and C filiformis ; but more especiall)^ to the High- land group, such as Saxifj'agastellaris, S. oppositifolia, Saussicrea ulpina^ Arctostaphyllos Uva-ursi{no\. seen in Antrim since 1837) Salix herbacea^^ Ca?-ex rigida, and Isoetes lacustris, which are, considering their requirements, fairly frequent, and some even common, in Donegal ; but of rarity greater or less in the north-east. If I were to select places in Ireland, conveying an idea of the most northern (Highland) assemblages of plants, I would place them in the follo"wing order, premising that there is a long gap between the first two and the following habitats : — 1. Slieve League in Donegal. 2. Ben Bulben, Co. Sligo ; and the groups (Anna Coona, Truskmore, &c.) around. 3. Muckanaght, Co. Galway, 4. Brandon, Co. Kerry ; or Maamturk (Maumeen), Galway. 5. Bulbein Mount (Inishowen). 6. Ben Evenagh, Derry ; or Reeks (lyough Googh), Co, Kerr>\ 7. Nephin or Croaghpatrick, Co. Mayo. The remainder — Antrim Glens, Wicklow, and Mourne Mountains — never show such pleasing groups of alpines as these do. I have not been careful to make out the totals. I speak rather from the memory of the general facies of the flora in these places, several of which disclosed their botanical secrets for the first time to the present WTiter. A4 $6 The Irish Naturalist. [February,. I will now notice a few omissions, &c., which are not de- pendent on information unavailable for the purposes of the Cybcle. Those additional to Donegal are numbered. The references are to papers enumerated in Cybcle {Introductum : hi dex to autho rs ) — 1. Ranunculus heterophyllus, Fries.— In several of my Donegal papers, but I confess uiy nomenclature (authorit}' for name) has. been confusing. A frequent species in Donegal. 2. R. Llng^ua, L.— A Derry locality is given in my " Plants of some of the Mountain Ranges," &c. In deference to RIackay's record of so unmistakable a plant, I have let it stand for XI. in my Flora. 3. Thallctrum ficxuosum, Bernh.(Z'. ^W//;;/////, Wallr.)— Brown Hall,. Co. Donegal. Determined by Mr. More (iSS6). Papavcr Argcmone, L. — Howth and Baldoyle {Flora of FFowth), V. Nasturtium palustre, DC— Liffey, at Island Bridge Weir, about 1870, V. Sisymbrium Thallanum, J. Gay. — \^2imb^.-y (^Flora of Lar7ibay),Y. 4. Hcllanthcmum vulgare, L. — Should be included. Anyone who sees it in situ would consider it native in Donegal. Viola tilrta, L- — Lambay Island [Flora of Lambay), V. Arcnaria trincrvia, L. — Powerscourt, and between Powerscourt front gate and Enniskerry, by the roadside (MS. lent to Mr. Colgan ; referred to hereafter as MS.), IV. ; Glencullen (MS.), V- 5. Saxlfraga hypnoldes, L.— I believe native in Fanet, Donegal. The rock is basaltic and the form {gemmipara, Sj'me), T think is the same as that of Ben Evenagh in Derry. Anthcmis nobllls, L. — To 1,200 feet, Kerr^- ; 1,500? Wicklow : 900 Donegal {^On Range of Plants, etc.'). Artemisia vulgaris, L. — Abundant in many parts of Donegal. "Nowhere common," Cybcle. How far "introduced" it is im- possible to speculate. A pestilential weed in cultivated land though never appearing in gardens. 6. Taraxacum Dens-lconis, Desf, var, palustre, DC— Frequent in Donegal. {Flora of N. W. Donegal, (Sr^r.) Andromeda Pollfolla, L.— Bog close to Lough Dergon the west side with Malaxis paludosa, VI. (MS furnished to Mr. Colgan). Lyslmachia vulgaris, L. -Very scarce in Donegal, and localities required. 7. Anchusa sempervlrens, L — District XII. has scarcely more claims to this plant than XI. It is naturalized in both. Wlertensla marltlma, S. F. Gray.— No reason to consider it as decreasing in Donegal. Uthospermum arvense,L.— The Donegal record is unfortunately an error of name by a slip of the pen, and belongs to L.officina'lc. L. arvensc has only appeared as a casual. I900.] Hart. — Rcma7-ks on Cybck Hibcrnica. 2>1 Bartsia viscosa, L — The absence of au intermediate station from Kerry to Donegal is no sort of suggestion that it has been intro- duced in Donegal. It is onlv evidence that like manv other rare plants it lias disappeared from many stations. It occurs in Scotland. Other outliers of a similar character are Carum verticillaiuvi^ Euphorbia hiberna^ and Trichonianes radicans. IVIelampyruiYi sylvaticum, L. — The late Mr. A. G. More counselled me against ni}' inclination to reject this record from Donegal. I believe no specimens were forthcoming, and he believed tliere was an error. I have repeatedly searched the place indicated in Cybclc. Orobanchc minor, Smo — On Ononis and Lotiis at Portmarnock, V. (Jourti. of Bot., 1S97). The specimeni> are in the Dublin National Museum. They have been examined by Mr. Bennett, who has made a study of tlie genus. He says he can refer them to nothing but O. minor. The station is on unbroken ground, two or three hundred j-ards south of the Club-house. Having seen vay record, the editors need scarcely have been at the trouble, gratuitously, of remarking " exclusively on T. fratcnse in Ireland." NcpctaCIechoma, Eeuth. — Singularh- rare in Donegal. Atriplcx portulacoldcs, L. — Muddy estuar^^ close to the old ruined mill ai Portmarnock, V. A. farinosa, L —^^o. Journal of Botany, 1897, p. 34^. This record is omitted in Cybek. The species appears to be spasmodic in its appearance in Dublin Ba}-. When I gathered it in 1897, my nephew was with me on each occasion, who has a good eye for plants. He was unable to rediscover it in 1898; it was however somewhat late in the season when he searched. I have no doubt of the species. In 1899 it reappeared (in no such plenty) in several of the habitats given in fonrnal of Botany. Euphorbia hiberna, L. — The name Makkin bzcee is the Irish in use in Galway for the Irish Spurge, as I recorded in Joiirn. of Bot. in 1873. It is the older name, given by Threlkeld and K'Eogh, who copied Threlkeld whenever he could, and when he could not, he let his imagination play freely around, at any rate in records, which should never be quoted unconfirmed. The Irish name given in Cybele is both wrongl}^ spelt and interpreted. It is given in O'Reilly " buidhe-jia-ningean, spurge ; tetJij'fnai/ia,^' which would pronounce " bwee-na-ngeown," and translate " the yellow wave-lover." According to Cameron this name refers properly to £. Fara/ias, but the derivation would limit the name to £. portlandica, but as we see from O'Reilly it is generic. Cameron {^Gaelic Plant-tiames) blunders about the trout poisoning. I never heard in Kerry of any plant used for the purpose except the Irish Spurge. At any rate Makkin bwee seems to be correctly the dis- tinctive name. I believe the name of the hills above Chevy Chase, where I found this plant, was " Derrybrian." I did not learn the name till afterwards. It certainly was not " Derryea," as given in ^S The Irish Nat^iralisf. [February, Cybdc. The name would be on old maps probablj-. It is not on any maps I have. The plant extends up the stream from the shooting-box of the Persse family (of Roxboro'). known as Chevy Chase, into these hills. 8. E. amygdaloides, L.— At Glenalla, Co. Donegal. The twenty years may now be called forty. It should not be excluded from XI. It is extremely unlikel}- it was intentionally introduced, or intro- duced at all. E. Paralias, L.— Onh' one localit}-, very sparing!}-, in Donegal, E. fortlandica is much more western in Donegal, occurring frequently right round from Malin Head to Bnndoran. It will snrely be found in Sligo, or somewhere between Bundoran and the Aran Islands. The distribution of these two plants is ver}^ odd, and might be paralleled by that of the two Statices on the Irish coasts, E. exig°ua, L.— Apparently absent from the West of Ireland, Only occurs in the eastern half of Donesjal, and is verv rare, Parietaria officinalis, L. — Ver}- rare in or absent from the north-west. Not seen west of Derry by me in Donegal. Salix phylicifolia, L.— None of the north-east records have been verified for many years. TLe same remark applies to 5. w/^r/V^wj-, It is impossible to help feeling sceptical, or at any rate dis- appointed. I believe the recorded localities have been carefully searched. I spent more than one day in the Roe above Dungiven. I have also doubts about " Urris Mountains, Donegal, C. Moore," It is so vague as to be useless, covering many miles of country (in Inishowen), but none that is likely to harbour Salix nigricans^ and I have been botanizing over that country for over twenty years. The only evidence I have of this plant in Donegal is from a supposed nigricans x caprea from Ardara, {teste Mr, Bennett), S, lYloorci, H. C. Watson, (5. herbacea X nigricans ?)— This must be extremely rare on the top of Muckish, which is a plateau that occupies perhaps a square mile. It is such an inviting place to imagine finds of alpine /unci, or Fttbiis Chamamorus, as well as this willow, that I have frequently gone over it extensively on my knees, without success, Empctrum nigrum, L, — "Rare at low levels" (!) Cybde. — It descends to sea-level all round Donegal ; in Acliill, Mayo, and elsewhere in the west. In the east strictly a mountain plant, Juniperus nana, Willd,— Near Lake Nalacken, Brandon, Kerry, at about 1,650 i&at {Plants 0/ some Mountain Ranges, etc., 1884), Eplpactls latifolia, L,— Very rare in Dublin, Howth, 1897 {/otcrnal of Bot.) Specimens in Nat. Museum, Dublin, Roadside between Galvvay and Oughterard, 1883, (MS, to Mr, Colgan), VIII. Ophrys aplfera, L,— See Flora of Howth. Well known on Howth, and appears fairly regular in one or two places. Very rare in Dublin, V. I goo.] Hart. — Remarks on Cybclc Hibcrnica. 39 Arum maculatum, L.— Very local in Donegal, and apparently confined to the S.W. Distinctly a limestone plant in the West of Ireland. It appears to occur in Aran only of the Atlantic islands off Ireland. Eriophorum latifolium, Hoppe.— The Co. Wicklow record might be obliterated, as the plant has been for half a century or so. Carex stricta, Good. — Very rare in Donegal, and appears to me rare in most parts of Ireland away from the larger river- swamps or lake-margins, where onl}' it attains its full tussocky perfection. Carex riparia, Curtis.— Powerscourt, Co. Wicklow, near thegame- keeper's lodge, IV. 9. Agrostis vulgaris, L., var. pumila, Lightf— Occurs apparently in all the mountain districts, except Ben Bulben and Sperrins. Ranges to 1,850 Galtees, and 1,550 in Donegal. (See On Ranges of Flowering Plants^ etc.') Phleum arenarium, L. — Portrane and North Bull (MS.) Festuca sylvatica, Vill. — By the river between Rathdrum and Glendalough, IV. (MS.) TrichoiYianes radicans, Swartz. — The Donegal record, " Hart., 1885, y," is nii.sleading. The Killaruey Fern was found by me in 1884, about a fortnight later than Mr. Mahony's discovery, the knowledge of which led me to the special search that was successful, as dul}- recorded in 1885, y. The " first record' should stand "(Pierce Mahony) ; Hart {/oum. 0/ Bot., 1884, p. 213)," for I had the pleasure of sending the notice of it. That is to say, the first printed record, perhaps there was an epistolary one earlier. In my Flora of Donegal, "1885" is an error for " 1884." Selaginella sclaginoides, Gray. —Add Donegal to " sandhills by the sea." The Appendix has been happily made use of liberall}^ Such receptacles for matters of opinion mtist alwa3's be open to disputes. Some of the data in this Appendix hurt our feelings, but generally it is a great improvement to the body of the Cybele. It would be a good rtile to relegate to the Appendix all unconfirmed records of Wade, Smith, and especially K'Eogh. This has been largely done, but not completel}^ and I have not been at the pains to collect stich omitted items. I may mention Carex strigosa, " Wade Rar.," Dargle, Co. Dublin, and Eupho7'bia hiberna, Anakirk (? Rine- kirk, searched by Mr. Stewart), Co. I^imerick, K'Eogh. K'Kogh has a formula, " it grows wild in the mountains of Burrin " (Clare), which he applies to Saha'eia, " Hedge hj^ssop," Gratiola ; and a study of his localities reveals great unreliability. 40 The Irish Naturalist. [Fel^ruary, 10. Hclianthcmum vulgrarc, L. — Co. Donegal. — The simple asser- tion that " the species was either planted or derived from cultivation," however courteous to my expressed opinion, does not satisfy me as an argument. It is merely so many words. Unless the editors have seen the station, they are unable to form an opinion of any value. I will be happj'to guide either of them to the locality, which they are very unlikely (so remote is it) to find without assistance. It is a most interesting country, of man}' miles in extent, absolutely barren and devoid of possibility of cultivation, of the same formation as the well-known South Isles of Aran, craggy, but not so deeply fissured, and if anything less fertile. I have never visited this district (and it takes a week to thrash it) without great expectation, and I fully expect it will yet 3'ield more rarities. There is no cultivation of any sort near the Helianthenmni, nor a garden within some miles. Nor is the plant one which shows any disposition to ramble, even iD a garden. * Reseda suffruticulosa, L. — The claims of this plant to a place in the flora, from the Portmarnock habitat, are too strong to be overlooked. It has been naturalised there abundantly for at least 70 years It should be left in with asterisk. * Medicago sativa, L. — Admittedly and abundantly established in various places about Baldoyle, Portmarnock, Hovvth, and Portrane. Its claims are better than many admitted plants. TrifoIiuiYi maritimum, Huds. — "The district V. records are all probably referable to T. scabnini " This is incorrect. The Lambay record is undoubtedly referable to T. striatiun, where Z". scabrmn has not been found, and the former is plentiful. This is probably the case also with Kilbarrack record. Ribes Crossularia, L. — Is thoroughly established in wild places in Donegal. Sometimes borne thither by streams in flood, but sometimes apparently by birds. Anthcmis arvensis, L — Has as good a claim (from Howth, Portmarnock, &c.), to a place in flora as various other cereal weeds. Centaurea solstitialis, D. — I have gathered this twice at Port- marnock, about 1870-75. IVIyosotis sylvatica, Hoffm A white variety of this used to grow at Woodlands, among trees near the lake. No doubt an escape, but in a wild place. 11. Atropa Belladonna, L.— Should be kept in flora with a star. Mentha viridls, Lr. -I cannot follow the reasoning. When a plant is thoroughly established, in a wild place, unaided by cultivation, and where it has not been planted, does it come within a "starry influence" .^ Otherwise a number of other plants should be where these last two are. I should prefer the latter course myself. igoo.] Hart. — Remarks on Cybele Hibernica. 41 Pinus sylvcstris, L.— The people who "have any Irish" in Fanet, Co. Donegal, know the Scotch fir as ' Gyoos " {Guiinhas) ; and the silver is " Gyoos bany That from the bog is called Gyoos dhu. Joyce gives several names derived from Guiinhas (2nd Ed., vol. ii., p. 358), and more could easily be added. But he says it is a question whether the place is named from the living tree or from bog-deal. The statement, however, that " the absence both from the spoken language and from the place-names of Ireland of any native name for the tree would tend to prove that it had become quite rare if not extinct in very early times " is unwar- ranted. O'Reilly gives the above word and also pin-cratn^ no doubt modern. The Cybele credits Donegal with 722 species and sitb-species. To these I add 12 as above, making 734. This may be taken as the number down to 1894, since when, though I have made many explorations and discoveries, I have published nothing but a few short notes, accounted for in the Cybele. Since that time also I have had useful help from Mr. Hunter (the rediscoverer of the Irish Spurge in Donegal), in Inishow^en. Hieracia are alreadj' dealt with. They are not included in this total, except the forms (22 in number) selected for enumera- tion in the Cybele. Of that number Donegal is credited with JO (!) forms. My receut researches add 7 more of the said Cybele list, bringing the flora total up to 741. The manner in which, however, the Hieracia are enumerated, varieties being raised to sub species, or even to species at pleasure, renders numerical computation almost hopeless in this genus. I would, however, add some well-marked forms to the total from m}^ foregoing list, which are not recorded hitherto from Ireland, viz. : H. sparsifolitcvi, H. proxhmim^ H. {saxifragum) orimeles, making the total 744. Brambles are to be counted as only one all round, which is a relief. I will, however, enumerate the Rubiis forms I have had named from Donegal. The full localities for the following list will be found in my Flora of Donegal. I will also enumerate (unnumbered) the names of rare Donegal plants for which I have found new localities, also to be found in the Flora, or else in a paper on Inishowen and Fanet excursions during the season of iSgS."* So that the following remarks refer mainly to information relative to Donegalplants which was tmavailable to the editors of the Cybele, 2nd Edition. Plants numbered are additions to ^ Jotirn. Bot., xxxvii., 1899, 42 The Irish Naturalist. [Februarj-, the Donegal flora as enumerated in Cybclc Those unnumbered are rare species or sub-species for which new localities have been found. 1. Thallctrum dunensc, Dum. Ranunculus bulbosus, L. — "Rare in the north-west," Cybele. Frequent all round the sandy coast of Donegal, and abundant in most suitable places. 2. R. auricomus, L- — Most rare in the north-west (Donegal). A single locality in the eastern half of the county. Claucium flavum, Crantz. — Has no place in the Donegal flora. 3. Viola odorata, L. — Thoroughly established in several places. 4. V. (sylvatica) Rcichcntoachiana, Boreau.— Carrablagh, &c., 1898. 5. V. tricolor, L.— Fanet, 1898. To these two I had not accorded segregative distribution. 6. Aratois ciliata, R. Br. — Rosses, Co. Donegal. "The best ciliata I have seen " — A. Bennett. Arenaria trincrvia, L. — Abundant by the River Erne. Ulex Callii, Planch.— Inishowen, 1898. (Mr. Hunter). 7. Ononis rcpcns, L.— Omit brackets in Cybele to XI. Two new localities discovered. Rubus.— The forms noticed in Donegal additional to those given in Cybele, are A', plicatiis, Wh. and N., and var. ke/nisU'inon ; K, carpi)iifoliiis, Wh. and N., and A', inctirvattis var. ; R. rhafuni- folius, Wh. and N. ; R. pyj-aifiidalts, Kalt. ; R. leiicostachys, Schleich, and A', villieaulis ; R. 7'osaceiis, var. hystrix \ R. Koehhri, Wh, and N. ; and A', eorylifolhis, Smith. These have been determined by competent authorities (see Flora of DonegaV). Radiola IVIillegrana, L.— Profusely abundant at Malin Head, the extreme north of Ireland. 8. Rosa mollis, vSmitli. Dryas octopctala, L.— Less scarce than I supposed in its single locality. Epilobium ang-ustifolium, L — Sea-level to 1,100 feet, Donegal. Apium inundatum, Reichb. fil., var. IVIoorci, vSyme. A. nodiflorum, D., var. ocreatum, Bab. A. nodiflorum, L., var. repens, Plook. fil. Pimpinella Saxifraga, L.— PVequent in the S.W. of Donegal, on limestone. 9. Arctium minus, Bernh.— Clonmany, Inishowen (1898), and prob- ably frequent. Carduus crispus, L.— Near Malin town, Culdaff, &c., in Inish- owen, frequent. 10. Staticc bahusiensis. Fries, var boreal is, Fr. — Determined by Mr. Bennett. North shores of Mulroy, Co. Donegal. This form is not mentioned in Cybele. S. occidentalis, Moyd {binei'vosa, P. L. Smith), var. inter- media, vSyme. 1900.] nK^T.—Re??2arks 07i Cybclc Hibernica. 43 11. IVIyosotfs collina, HofTm.-New locality, aud for var. umbrosa Biscli. {Jide A. Eeniiett). ' 12. Utricularia neglecta, Lelim — S.W. Donegal. Ulmus montana, L.— New native localit}-. 13. Potamogeto nvarlans, Monig. { = heterophylhis x Z?c?V/).— See Flora. P. rufescens, Sclirad. — Not unfrequent in Donegal. P. nitens, Weber, var. intermedius, Tisselius.— ''Closely approx- imating to " — A. Bennett. P. lucens, Tv., var. lancifolius, Mertens and Koch. 14. P. flabellatus, Bab. P. decipiens, P. Zizli, P. pi*deIong:us, and P. obtusifollus; new localities for these in Donegal. P. pusillus, Iv., var. tenuissimus, Koch. — Doagh Island, Inish- owen, Co. Donegal, 1898. Not in Cybele. Zostera marina, L , var. angrustifolia, Fr.— Inishowen. Not in Cybele. Z. nana, Roth. — New locality in Inishowen, 1898. 15. Eleocharls acicularls, R. Br.— S.W. Donegal. 16. E. unig^Iumis, Link,— S.W. Donegal. Carex teretiuscula. Good., var. Ehrhartiana, Hoppe. — Three Donegal localities westwards. Not in Cybele. 17. C. acuta, Iv.— S.W. Donegal. C. aaita var. prolixa, S.W. Donegal ; Not in Cybele. C. aquatilis, Wahlb. (type) with var. vh-escens at Doochary Bridge, Donegal, so this county has all three forms. An instance of a Highland type plant (in three forms) at sea-level. C. vulg:ar!s, Fr., var. Juncella, Fr. — Several localities in Donegal. C. limosa, C. pallescens, C. filiformls, all frequent west of Lough Swilly. C. riparia, Curtis.— A remarkable form at St. John's Point, S.W. Donegal, " closely approaching the American var. IVatsoni Olney "~A. Bennett. C, ampullacea, Good., var. elatlor, Blyth — Two localities. Not in Cybele. 18. Poa nemoralis, Iv. — Inishowen, 1898. Discovered by Mr. Hunter. 19. Trisetum flavesccns, Beauv. — Expectation correct. Found it about Bundoran. 20. Bromus erectus, Huds. — I see no reason why Cybele should exclude from XI. ''railway banks, Gt. Northern," and include III., " railway banks, Portarlington " ! 21. B. secallnus, L. — Apparently established off cultivation l)y Lennan River, Donegal. B. commutatus, Schrad. — Several more good localities in Donegal. Asplenlum viride, Huds. — I fear the Loughsalt locality is an error. It dates back to 1868, and I have never refouud it there. 44 The Irish Naturalist. [February, Cystopteris fragilis, Bernh, — Throughout Donegal., except south-east, and not unfrequeut in mountains westwards. Var. deutaia, in at least three localities in Co, Donegal. Lastraea Thelypteris, U— New locality, S.W. Donegal. 22. Ophlogrlossum polyphyllum, Syme .? 23. Equisetum trachyodon, Braun.— Two localities, vS.W. Donegal. Lyco podium clavatum, L.— Not un frequent in Donegal. To 1,950 feet. L. alpinum, Iv— Half a dozen localities. Isoetes lacustrls, var. falcata, Tausch —Near Ballyshannon. {fide A Bennett). 24. Chara contraria, Kuetz.— Fanet and Ardara. 25. C. hispida, L.— Fanet, 1898. C. fragills, Desv.. var. dellcatula. — Frequent in Donegal. The above 25 additions bring the Donegal total to 744 4- 25 = 769. But from this we have to deduct Glaucium flazmvi^ Lepidiiim Smithii, Hieraciiim borcale, Sinvi lati- foli7(??ii^?) Lithosperimun arve7ise, and Mclainpyi'iun sylvaticmn, all of which are counted in the Cybelc\.Q)\.2\ of 722. The reasons for excluding these are given. This leaves a residue of 763. In conclusion I wish to say that it is nowise ni}" desire to find fault with this most careful and creditable production. But I think it will be of use to have pointed out some of those errors that were certain to occur, and I am bound to uphold the character of the flora of my native count3^ I would like here to suggest an improvement to a " botanical subdivision " of the county suggested by Mr. R. I4o3'd Praeger."" He divides the county in two, drawing a line along the Kilmacrenan barony to the Gweedore River and adding that northern portion to Inishowen. Any such line crossing the west of the count}^ is at variance with its botanj^ which is harmonious from Sheephaven to Donegal Bay. The onl}^ division practicable would be Inishowen and Raphoe baronies (my I., II., and V.) on the east, which are fairly dis- tinct botanically from the rest of the county. Fanet and the rest of District III., are intermediate but more western. Tirhugh in the south should be added to the Fermanagh district, scientifically, but it would be a mistake to remove it from Donegal. The county is better left as one subdivision as it stands. The Foyle and Malin Head are great boundaries phytogeographically as well as biologically generall}'. Carrablagh, Co. Donegal. ^ On the Botanical Subdivision of Ireland, Irish Naturalist, Feb. 1896. 1900.] Proceedings of 111 sh Societies. 45 PROCEEDINGS OF IRISH SOCIETIES. ROYAT, ZOOI^OGICAI, SOCIETY. Receut gifts include a pair of Giskins from Mr. W. D. Beatty. An Antelope has been born in the Gardens. We regret to learn that the deaths of the fine male Chitapanzee, which has been m the Gardens for four years, and of the Silver Gibbon, leave the collections for the present without any of the man-like Apes. 3,273 persons visited the Gardens during December. BEI.FAST NaTURAI^ISTS' F1EI.D Cl,UB. January 19.— Mr. Wii,i,iam Swanston, F.G.S., in the chair. A lecture was delivered by Mr. A. Spkers, B.Sc, on cavern formations, with special reference to the mammoth cave of Kentuck)-. For half an hour before the lecture there was an exhibition and discussion of land and fresh-water shells, of which a large number were exhibited by Messrs. H. L. Orr, R. Welch, W. Swanston, W. Gray, and R. Standen, of Manchester. Mr. R. Welch read a short paper on the rare forms of Helix iiemoj-alis, found at Bundoran, where the normal form is made into necklaces, and sold to visitors. Necklaces of this kind are survivals of the pre-historic forms found in ancient Irish graves Scalariform and reversed specimens occur at Bundoran, as well as a curious heavy form of var. hyalozonata, all being of great interest to naturalists, and furnishing a topic for an animated discussion. Mr. R. Standen, of Manchester Field Club, sent for exhibition a series of English and Irish amber shells iStucinea), and Mr. Orr exhibited a curious malformation of the shell Clausilia bzdentata, which had two mouths, and the members present exhibited over one hundred specimens of reversed and scalari- form shells oi Helix neuioralis. Mr. Speers, proceeding with his lecture, very fully described the various forms of caves, and demonstrated by a successful chemical experiment the solubility of limestone in water charged with carbon dioxide. The extensive deposits of limestone in Ireland and elsewhere are acted upon in this manner. Mr. Speers described the great Mammoth cave of Kentucky, which he had visited, and which is found to consist of a series of chambers on five different levels, connected by miles of avenues through which the visitor is taken by the guides. In closing his address Mr. Speers referred to the anthropological value of caverns, which in pre-historic times w^ere the resort of early mankind, and referred in detail to some special examples. Mr. Welch and Mr. Hogg exhibited some very excellent lantern views of caverns in many parts of central Ireland, and view of egg-cluster of the Kerry slug (^Geonialactts^ for the first time on any screen, and Mr. Gra)' exhibited and described views of caverns that occur in the several geological formations of the County Antrim, mainly, however, such as were formed by marine denudation. 46 The Irish Nafiiralist. [Pebruaiy, BoTANiCAT, Section.— Deciomrer t6.— An instructive lecture was given by Rev. Canon H. W. Lett, on '• Sedges," which was fully illustrated by specimens from his own collection. He drew particular attention to the species most likely to be confounded, and showed the distinguishing marks. Some species might still be overlooked in the district for this reason, such as Carcx paucijlora^ which he found in one locality in Co. Antrim a few years ago, and which Mr. Adams has lately gathered in another place nearer Carnlough. Cork Naturai^ists" Fiei^d Ci,ub. December 6.— Mrs. Brooke-Hughes delivered a lecture entitled " vSome By-paths of Science." Mr. T. Farrington, M.A., presided, and there were many present. The Chairman, in introducing Mrs. Hughes, wished to inform them that in a competition for the preparation of botanical specimens by the proprietors of CasseWs Magazine, there had been seven prizes won by Cork people, which was a larger number than an}' other city of the United Kingdom outside London could boast. Mrs. Brook-Hughes then proceeded with her theme, which was both entertaining and instructive. She related trips to several parts of the South and West of Ireland, and recounted the different floral and eeoloeical features of the several places. She also referred to some of the peculiarities by which the instinct of birds and insects was made manifest. The lecture was illustrated by Mr. J. Bradshaw. The pro- ceedings closed with a warm vote of thanks to Mrs. Hughes. Dubinin Microscopicai, Ci^ub. December 21.— The Club met at Leinster House. Mr. F. W. Moore showed leaves from the ovary oi Arachnanthe Lowii, a remarkable Orchid from Borneo, which recently flowered in the collection at Glasneviu' There were six racemes, varying in length from six feet to eight feet two inches, and the ovaries of all the flowers were covered with a dense, brown, moss-like pubescence. The hairs composing this pubescence were large, compound, much branched, composed of many cells, and closely crowded together. Professor Scott showed crystals of egg-albumen prepared by Hopkins's modification of Hofmeister's method. The crystals appeared as fan- shaped bundles of acicular crystals or spheres, composed of a great number of such. Mr. M'ArdIvE exhibited the mother-spores of Lejeiinea Rossettiana, which were found in the lower part of the capsule, where the}' occur in circular discs. The young spores present two forms, oblong-cuneate and oblong-elongated ; about twelve occupy the outer part of the circle, with four in the centre, all enclosed in undulating delicate tissue, called the anhisporhmi, which also envelopes the young spores, which are of a bright green colour, with delicate granular markings on the exosporium. Mr. H. J. Seymour showed several gold nuggets, the largest nearly one-eighth of an inch in diameter, obtained by Mr. M 'Henry, of the Geological Survey, some twelve years ago, from Mr, Acheson's washings in the Gold Mine River, Co. Wicklow. 1900.] ^y NOTES. ZOOLOGY. INSECTS. Abundance of Colias edusa in Connemara. In the January number of the Entom. Mo. Mag. (vol. xxvi., p. i), the Rev. C. T. Cruttwell, of Kilworth, Leicestershire, records the occurrence of hundreds of males of this butteifly at Renvyle during the past summer. Zelleria phillyrella, Mllliere, Introduced in Connemara. On pp. 4-6 of the same number of the EiiL Mo. Mag., Mr. C. G. Barrett records the capture by Mr. Crutwell of a single specimen of this South European insect at Renvyle. He states, on the authority of Mr. W. F. de V. Kane, that several species of its food-plant — PInlly)xa — are cultivated in gardens in the West of Ireland, and expresses his opinion that the moth has been then introduced into our country. Late Wasps' Nests. On December Stli, I saw three wasps' nests all working, in the vicinity of Fassaroe, Co. Wicklow. On December 15th one of these had apparently ceased, but the other two were still lively. Last year (189S) I saw a wasps' nest in the same neighbourhood hard at work on December 23rd ; and I learned from Mr. Harrington that this nest continued active until the beginning of the new year. Mr. Barrington also told me that in a former year he had observed one so late as January loth. At Bally- hyland I have never seen, and only once heard of, a wasps' nest working in December ; but this would seem to be of normal occurrence in parts of Co. Wicklow. The nests referred to above were, I believe, all inhabited by Vespa vulgaris. Ballyhylaud, Co. Wexford. C. B. Moffat. MOLLUSCS. Arion ater, var. Bocagrei, in Ireland. Some years ^ago Prof, Simroth described a new variety of the common slug, Arion ater, from Portugal, which, instead of being uniform in colour, was yellow above, with brown sides. He named it variety Bocagei, after the Portuguese naturalist, Bocage. Mr. CoUinge now records {Jouni. MalacoL, 1899, vol.7 p. 33\ the same variety from the South of Ireland, and expresses the view that it belongs to the same catagory as Geomalaciis niacnlostis, as far as distribution is concerned. Mr Collinge, it will be noticed, uses the name Arion eiiipiricontm of Ferussac instead of the earlier A. ater., as he believes these to be two dis- tinct species. Prof. Simroth and I do not agree with him, and it certainly seems to me that Arion ater, being the older name, has the priority, and should therefore be used. R. F. SCHARFF. Science and Art Museum, Dublin. 48 The 1) ish Naturalist. [February, Vertigo antivcrtlgo In Ireland. The current number oi \X\^ Journal of Coiichology contains a note by Mr. Welch recording the occurrence of a large colony of this little shell in rushy ground, near Shaw's Bridge, Belfast. Mr. Welch obtained 400 specimens with ver_y little difficulty, by cutting off bunches of stems of the rushes that abounded, and shaking them over a newspaper. Amphipeplea glutfnosa, lYIuIler, in Ireland. In 1871 the late Charles Ashford, a well-known English conchologist, recorded in Science Gossip the finding of this very rare freshwater shell in the River Brosna, King's Co., and in W\Q.Joiirn. of Conchology for 1879 its oc- currence in the Newry Canal, Co. Down, M'here only two specimens were obtained, though it was plentiful in the first localitj' named. Since then Dr. Scharff informs me that Mr. Farran obtained one dead specimen on the shores of Lake Derevaragh, Co. Westmeath, and on looking over some shells Mr. W. F. de V. Kane collected lately in Lough Arrow, on the borders of the Counties Sligo and Roscommon, I find a half grown specimen. To these records I am now able to add another. Mr. Wm. Green, of Belfast, who has lately taken up the study of mollusca, discovered three specimens in two drains on the edge of the Bann River, North of Porta- down, Co. Armagh, on December 25th last. Theywere living among dead Duckweed and plant debris on the surface of the water. Some of the shells were almost full-grown, and were kept alive for some days in order to examine the way in which the expansion of the mantle covers the shell Jeffreys, Adams, and other writers state that though very local it is sometimes abundant. Though not quite such a local species QiS, Linnuva involiita, Aiuphipcplea glntinosa must be considered as one of our rarest freshwater shells, and both Mr. Green and Mr. Kane are to be congratulated in adding a new locality to those alread}- known. Belfast. R. WEI.CH. FISHES, Blue Sharks in Killala Bay. One day towards the end of October as Captain Kirkwood was walking along the sands at the western end of Bartragh, he found a large Blue Shark {Sc/ac/w maxima) thrown up by the surf at high water mark ; the fish was dead, but quite fresh, and was one of the largest I have heard of on the Irish coast, measuring between nine and ten feet in length. .Another specimen of this species of shark was taken in the estuary (about the 22nd November) by two persons who were out shooting wild fowl ; as they were passing between the islands they heard a splashing some distance astern, and rowing to the place from where the noise proceeded, they found the fish floundering about in the shallow water where it was aground. Having shot it, they took it into their boat with some difficulty, as it was about eight feet in length, and very heavy. Robert Warren. Moyview, Ballina. 1900] Notes. 4g BIRDS. Irish Ornithology. The Zoologist for November contains an article by Mr. H. E. Howard, entitled " Ornithological Notes from the North-west of Ireland," de- scribing the bird-life as noted by the author in August, presumabl}' on the coast of Donegal. The paper closes with a commendable protest against the unsportmanlike slaughter of sea-birds by so-called " sports- men.' Golden Plover and Lapwings in the lYIoy Estuary. The Golden Plover did not visit the sands in any numbers until the middle, and towards the end of October, after which time they began to increase up to the 24th, when I saw fully 2,000 birds in one large stand on the Scurmore sands, and since then they continued to haunt the banks in probably larger numbers, for they now (2nd Dec.) have divided into two stands, one haunting the margin, and the other the Scurmore sands. The Lapwings appeared about the banks in their average numbers up to the 20th of November, when they visited the sands in immense flocks more numerous than in^au}- 3'ear since 1878 (the " Great Lapwing Year.") On the morning of the 20th, at daybreak, Mr. A C. Kirkwood, at Bartragh, saw an immense flock at a great height coming from a northerly direction over the bay. On reaching the island, they kept flying about for nearly an hour, and then settled down on the Bartragh sands opposite Moyne Abbey ; at the same time that this large assembly of birds was resting near INIoyne, equally large flocks were further up the estuary on the Scurmore and Castleconna sands, and a fourth large flock was resting on the banks outside the island. Most of these birds were evidently new arrivals distrusting their new quarters, and so restless and easily alarmed, that it was impossible to get within shot of any of the large stands. Mr. Kirkwood was out with his punt and gun all day, and was unable to get within range of any, but a few scattered birds. I was out all day on the 21st, and was equally unsuccessful. I never met Lapwing so wild, so utterly unlike their usual unsuspicious habits on the approach of a shooting punt. I was out again on the 22nd, and although the birds actually swarmed on the Moyne, Bartragh, Scurmore, and Castleconna sands, yet I was unable to obtain a shot at any but a few scattered birds. It is impossible to account for thisextreme wildness of the Lapwings » the fine weather cannot be the cause, for some of ni}^ best days' Plover shooting on the estuary were on mild, calm days, when owing to the mildness of the weather, the birds used to assemble on the sands at the edge of the channels to wash and bathe, and remain until driven off by the rising tide. It would be interesting to know whether a similar influx of Golden Plover and Lapwings has taken place in other parts of the country. RoBKRT Warren. Moyview, Ballina. 50 The Irish Naturalist. [February, 1900. Rough-Icggcd Buzzard near Londonderry. On 4th October last Mr. Wm. Kilpatrick shot a fine male specimen of the Rough-legged Buzzard {Butco lagopus^ Gmeliu) at Campsie, about five miles from Londonderry. This is the second occurrence of the species in Co. Derry, one having been taken at Castlerock early in November, 1S91, and sent to me for identification. D, C, CampbeIvIv. Londonderry. MAMMALS. The Hedgehog and its Food. The Irish Naturalist for December, vol. viii., no. 12, contains an interesting note relating to the Hedgehog and its food, by Mr, II, L. Orr. Perhaps a few observations I made on these animals may be of interest to Mr. Orr. I twice found Hedgehogs curled up, and on opening, or rather uncurling them, I found they had slugs sticking to their paws. One slug had a large piece almost completely bitten through I kept a Hedgehog last summer for some days, and fed him on slugs, and small and delicate-shelled snails. He seemed to prefer the slugs, but did not once refuse a snail when offered. Their teeth are very strong and sharp . when they bite a slug they usually take the piece out completely. John H O'Connei^i,. Dublin. I venture to suggest, that the broken snail-shells to which Mr. Orr refers under this heading, in the December number (p. 268), are not the work of the Hedgehog but of the Rat, an animal whose runs are commonly full of such fragments. The Hedgehog's propeusit}^ for eat- ing snails is so well known that it is often kept in gardens to destroy these unwelcome guests, and I have frequently watched it crunching them up, as Mr, Orr describes; but in my experience the Hedgehog crunches up a .shell so completely, that very few fragments are likely to be found afterwards. Last June, having promised to supply a neighbour with a few Hedgehogs, I caught two late one evening, shut them up for the night, and gave them for supper twenty-four large snails {Helix aspersa), as well as some slugs (chiefly Liinax iiiarginatus) — with the result that great crunching was heard during the next half-hour, and on the following morning there was not a vestige of snail or snail-shell remain- ing. Unless, therefore, the shell of Helix nemoralis is exceptionally dis- tasteful, I scarcely think many of its fragments would be left by the Hedgehog, 1 have also seen Hedgehogs, in the wild state, eating Arion ater—3. slug which, I believe, most birds reject. C. B. Moffat. Ballyhyland. Irish Naturalist, Vol. IX.] [Plate 2. FoRAMiNiFEKA, from Dog's Bay, Connemara. 1. Gaudryina riidis nov. x 40. 2. Lagena squamosa var. Moiitagui, Alcock x 75. To face p. 51.] Marcn, T900.] 51 THE FORAMINIFBRA OF DOG^S BAY, CONNEMARA. BY JOSE;pH WRIGHT, F.G.S. (Plate 2.) The September number of the Irish Naturalist for 1895 was entirely devoted to an account of the excursion of the Field Club Union to Galway in July of the same 3^ear. Among the reports then published of the specimens collected during the excursion, was one by mj^self on the Foraminifera of Dog's Bay. This list was hastily prepared when a very small portion only of the shore-sand had been examined, and although it could not be looked on as complete, I thought it best that it should appear in the same number as the other reports. At the time I had hoped to have been able to examine the re'maining material with little delaj^, but other engagements prevented my doing so until now. The sand at Dog's Bay is almost entirely composed of small molluscan shells, with Foraminifera, Ostracoda, and other marine organisms ; it is in consequence much lighter than ordinary sand. It extends for a long distance beyond high water mark, being blown inland by the prevailing westerly winds. The following list of 124 species and varieties consists for the greater part of Foraminifera which are widely distributed around the British coasts. Massilina secajis and Tju^icatidina lobatula are the prevailing forms, the former occurring in great abundance in the coarser floatings whilst the latter is even still more abundant in the finer ones. The porcellanous Foraminifera are well represented, many of the species occurring in considerable numbers. The hyaline forms are however b}' far the most abundant. '^\x^La^e7icB are very numerous and in great variety, twenty- two species having been obtained. Polymorphince are also plentiful, some of the species, as P. co77tmu7iis, P. cofupressa, and P. lactea often attaining large dimensions. The Arenacea are very rare, only three species having been found ; of these one specimen was obtained of Valvidhia fusca, two of Haplophragmium globi- geriTiifortne, and twenty of H. canaricTise. Lage7ia acuticosta^ MilioIi7ia circular is, and Polystomella 77iacella are new to the British fauna, and Gaudryiria rudis is new to science. The following species have been hitherto recorded in the British Isles only from the west coast of Ireland ; they A 52 The Irish Naturalist. [March, have all been previousl}" obtained in dredgings taken off Bantry Bay in 1885, during the first cruise of the s.s. ** Lord Bandon," viz. : — Spirolocutina te^iuiseptata, Textiilaria concava^ Biiliviina Biichiana, Lagcna finibriata, Nodosaria (Gl.) rotwi- data, Globigerina riibra, and Gypsiiia globulus. Dr. Alcock, in his " Natural History of Connemara,"^ enumerates sixt3^-one species and varieties of Foraminifera from this locality, all of which, with the exception of Trocham- vmia inflata and Nonionhia uinbilicatulay have been obtained from the sand which I examined. He also found, at a subse- quent period, a specimen of Lagena cre^iata, wdiich was figured by Balkwill and Wright in " Foraminifera of Dublin Ba}- and Irish Sea. "2 This rare and lovel}^ Lagena was found in a number of the Lord Bandon gatherings at depths varjdng from 44 to 214 fathoms, also at Hone Island between tides. To my friend Mr. Robert Welch I am greatly indebted for the quantity of sand and floatings which he placed in my hands for examination, as also for the very accurate and artistic drawings which accompan}' this paper. I have like- wise to express my thanks to Messrs. E. Collier and R. Standen, of Manchester, for kind assistance rendered also in collecting material. lyisT OF Species. Biloculina Irregularis, d'Orb.— Common. ringrens (Lamk,)— Very rare. var. elongrata, d'Orb. — Rare. depressa, d'Orb. — Common. Splroloculina planulata (Lamk.)— Common. excavata, dOrb.— Rare. canal feu lata, d'Orb. — Rare. tenulseptata, Br. — Rare. Millolina trig'onula (Lamk.)— One poor specimen. tricarinata (d Orb.)— Very rare. Inslgrnis, Br. — Rare. obIong:a (Montg.) — Frequent. semlnuluin (Linn.)— Common. aubcrlana (d'Orb.)— Frequent. contorta (d'Orb.)— Common. subrotunda (INIonlg.)— Very common. circularls (Bornem.)— Very common. semlnuda, Rss.— Very common. Feruesacli (d'Orb.)— Rare. blcornls(W. & J.)— Common. ____„ . 1 Proc. Lit ^ Phil. Soc, Mauchesler, 1864-5. vol. iv., no. 15. '"■ Trans. R.I. A., 1885, vol. xxviii., p. 339- pl- xiv., fig. 18. I900.] Wright. — Foraiiiinifera of Dog's Bay, Coyinemara, 53 IVIassilina secans (d'Orb.) — Qiiinqueloctdina secans (d'Orb.) 1826, Ann. Sci. A'aL, vol. vii., p. 303, No. 43; Modele, No. 96. Massilina secans (d'Orb.) Schlumberger, 1893, Mem. Soc. Zool. de France, vol. vi., p. 218, W.C. figs. 31-34 and pi. iv., figs. 82, 83. — Most abundant. Cornuspira Involvcns (Rss.) — Very rare. Haplophrag^mium canarlensc (d'Orb.) — Common. globigrerlniforme (P. & J.) — Very rare. Valvulina fusca (Will.) — One poor specimen. Textularia ag^g^Iutinans, d'Orb.— One specimen. gramen, d'Orb. — Very common. con cava, Kar. — Very common. Spiroplecta sairlttula (Def.)— Rare. Caudrylna rudis, nov. sp. PI. 2., figs. 1 a. b. Elongate, tapering, often more or less irregular in contour, round in transverse section, coarsely arenaceous. This species, in consequence of its rough exterior, does not show the chambers distinctly, and for the same reason its dimorphous mode of growth is not very apparent. It is generally found with the apex of the test broken off, and when such is the case three chambers are exposed in cross section ; the later chambers are arranged as in Textularia. Widely distributed around the Irish coast, it occurred in thirty of the Lord Bandon gatherings, South-West of Ireland, from between tides, to a depth of no fms. ; frequent off Belfast Lough, 30^60 fms, Common at Dog's Bay. Bullmlna pupoides, d'Orb.— Frequent, pyrula, d'Orb, — Very rare. fusiform is, Will.- One broken specimen. marg^lnata, d'Orb. — Common, specimens fine. subteres, Brd, — Frequent. tduchianaj d'Orb. — One specimen, Virffullna schreibersiana, Cz — One broken specimen. Bolivlna punctata, d'Orb. — Rare. pllcata, d'Orb.— Rare. laevigata (Will.)— Rare. difformis (Will,)— Rare. dilatata} Rss.— Rare. Casstdullna laevigata, d'Orb.— Very common. crassa, d'Orb. — Very common. Bradyl, Norman — Rare. Lagena globosa (Montg.) — Very common. Isevis (Montg.)— Rare, var. clavata (d'Orb.) — Common, var. graclllinria (Seg.)— Very rare. aspera, Rss.— One small specimen. hisptda, Rss. — Rare. acuticosta, Rss. — One specimen. costata (.Will.)— Common. sulcata (W. & J.)— Rare. var. Intcrrupta, Will.— Very common. var. Lyelll, vSeg,— Rare. A ^ 54 The Irish Naturalist. [March» Lsigena. Williamson I (Alcock)— Very common. striata (d'Orb.)— Rare. Ilneata (Will.)— Frequent. scm istr lata Will. , — Common. semllineata Wright,— One specimen. squamosa (Moutg.)— Very common. var. lYIontagul (Alcock). PI. 2, fig. 2 a. b. This variety occurs very fine and in considerable numbers at Dog's Bay. It differs from L. squamosa in being more globular, and frequently more or less compressed or irregular in contour; the raised surface reticulations are also very much smaller. I had given this variety a MS. name, but now find that it had already been named Entosoknia Montagiiihy V>r. Alcock in his "Natural History of Conuemara," but it was not figured b}' him, and this is no doubt the reason that it came to be overlooked; he thus describes it, "a squamous form but differs from the named varieties of E. squamosa in having its surface really covered with a pattern like scales instead of with raised reticulations. Well- developed specimens are not at all flattened, though many are found as if crushed, and they then present an appearance resembling a dried fig; the true shape however is a perfect oval, full and well rounded at the •mailer end, and from the middle of this projects a short smooth cylindrical tube. With a low power of the microscope, the whole surface of the body appears to be made up of small, almost square facets, arranged in distinct longitudinal rows ; but when these are more highly magnified each flattened surface is seen to rise a little anteriorl}^, and to have the front border rounded so as to give exactly the appearance of a covering of scales." Generally distributed around the Irish coast, but much less common than L. sqiiafiiosa. Lag'ena hexagrona (W^ill.)— Very common. laeviirata (Rss.)— Very rare. lucida (Will.) — Common, trigonal forms very rare. quadrlcostulata, Rss. —Very common, trigonal forms very rare. marg^tnata C^V. & B.)— Frequent. orbIg:nyana (Seg.) — Very common, trigonal forms rare. clathrata, Br. — Rare. pulcheila, Br. — Frequent, trigonal forms very rare. fimbriata, Br.— Rare. Nodosaria (Clandulina) rotundata, Rss.— Rare, surface marked with fine longitudinal lines. pyrula, d'Orb — Very rare. communis, d'Orb. — Very rare. scalarls (Batsch.) — Frequent. Cristcliaria rotulata (Lamk.)— Rare. crepidula (F. & M.) — Frequent. Poiymorphina lactca (W. & J.) — Very common, a few large fistulose forms. var. amygrdaloldes, P. B. & J.— Rare, var. oblong-a, Will.— Frequent. 1900 J Wright*. — Foranmiifera of Dogs Bay, Co7memara, 55 Polymorphlna sororla, Rss.— Rare. lanceolata, Rss. —Very rare. compressa, d'Orb. — Frequent, specimens fine. cotntnunis, d'Orb. — Very common, specimens fine rotundata (Bornem.) — Rare, myrlstlformis, Will. — Frequent. UvifiTcrlna ang^ulosa, Will. — Frequent. Clobfgrerlna bulloides, d'Orb. — Very common. rubra, d'Orb. — Very rare. aequllateralis, Br. — One specimen, I nf lata, d'Orb. — Very common. Orbullna universa, d'Orb. — Common. Splrillina virlpara, Blir. — Rare. margaritlfcra, Will. — One specimen. Patelllna corrug'ata. Will.— Rare. DIscorblna g^lobularis (d'Orb.) — Very common. rosacea (d'Orb.) — Very common. nltlda (Will.)— Common. orbicula is (Terg.)— Rare. parislen Is (d'Orb.)— Very rare. Wrightl Br.— Rare. BcrthelotI 'Orb.)— Rare. Planorbullna mcditcrrancnsis, d'Orb.— Common. 1 Truncatulina refulgcns (Montf.)— Very rare. lobatula (W. & J.)-Most abundant. variabilis, d'Orb.— Very common. ungcrlana (dOrb.)— One specimen. Pulvlnullna rcpanda (F. &M.)— Very rare. auricula (F, & M.)— Very common. patagronica (^d'Orb.)— Rare. R talla Bcccaril (Linn.)— Rare. orbicularis, d'Orb.— One specimen. Cypsina vcsicularis (P. & J.)— Rare. griobulus (Rss.)— One fine specimen. Inhaerens (Scli.)— Common. NonlonlnadcprcssuIa(W. & J.)— Very common. pauperata, B. & W.— Very rare. turglda (Will.)— Very rare. stelligcra, d'Orb.- Rare. Polystomclla crispa (Linn.)— Frequent. maceIIa(F. & M.)— Frequent. strlato-punctata (F. & M.)— Common. Operculina ammonoldes (Gron.)— Very rare. EXPI^ANATION OF P1.ATE 2. 1. Gaudryina riidis, sp. nov.—id) lateral aspect; [b) oral aspect. X 40. 2. Lagena squamosa, var. Montagui, Alcock— (a) lateral aspect ; (3) oral aspect. X 75- Belfast. 56 The Irish Naturalist, [March, REMARKS ON THE SECOND EDITION OF CYBELE HIBERNICA : A REJOINDER. BY NATHANIEL COLGAN, M.R.I.A., AND REGINAI^D W. SCUI.I.Y, F.Iv.S. There can be no more wholesome discipline for a writer than to have his work submitted to a searching and outspoken criticism, such as Mr. Hart has pronounced on the new Cybcle Hibe'niica in last month's issue of this Journal, When w^e first glanced over his Remarks^ and saw our editorial sins and peccadillos registered with all that conscientious minuteness which usually characterizes one's inventories of his neigh- bour's shortcomings, we began to fear that the case against us might prove a rather damaging one. But to a closer scrutiny it revealed many weak points. We found in not a few instances that our critic had charged us with doing what we had left undone, and with leaving undone what we had done ; in short, that the negligence imputed to us was often more fitly attributable to himself. Mr. Hart's examination of the Cybcle has been so searching and the objections taken to it so numerous that our defence must necCvSsaril}' be a rather lengthy one. For the sake of lucidity let us deal with his animadversions in sections. The chief counts in his indictment may be headed thus : Climate ; Irish Plant-names ; Ori^n of the Caiitabiian Group ; Omissions ; Miscellaneous Objections ; and our apologia maj^ be conveniently arranged under corresponding heads. C1.IMATE. Rainfall. — When preparing our section on climate for the second edition of Cybcle we at first endeavoured to arrive at a trustworthy average annual rainfall for East and West Ireland, founded on data drawn from a numerous series of properly dis- tributed stations and spreading over the same series of years. Failing to find sufficient data, we abandoned the attempt to arrive at averages and satisfied ourselves watli the two generalisa- tions, that the east is drier than the west, and that the Irish rain- fall reaches a maximum in the south- west. The accuracy of our ^^cond generalisation is thus c^uestioned by Mr. Hart on p. 28 of 1900.] COI.GAN AND SCUI.I.Y. — Remarks 07i Cybele Hihernica. 57 his Remarks : — " Connemara is, so far as our knowledge goes, far and away wetter than the south-west (unless at altitudes unsuit- able for comparison.) K3demore, in Connemara, has a mean of 8179 inches for sixteen years . . . No doubt there are valleys in the Kerry Reeks that would perhaps eclipse Connemara, but we have not got the proof" Now the required proof it so happens is to be had in Mr. Hart's own Flora of Donegal^ where (p. 345) he gives us the average rainfall for the Gap of Dunloe as 91*5 inches, and goes on to say — ''Parts of Kerry receive the heaviest rainfall in Ireland . . . Next to these the wettest portion would be found in Galway amongst the Twelve Bens . . . Kerr^Ms nearly twice as wet as Donegal in its wettest parts. Galway is about intermediate." Clearly we have to deal with two Mr. Harts — the author of the Flora of Dojiegal and the author of Remarks on the Second Edition of Cyhele^ and we find one of these, to use an eastern image, eating the words of the other. Which of them are we to believe? We think we may fairly claim that our generali- sations on Irish rainfall still hold the field. No doubt these generalisations might have been supported by a more imposing display of statistics, and our whole section on climate might have been easily expanded to 100 pagCvS in emulation of our critic, who has devoted no less than 67 pages of his Donegal Flora to tables of barometric pressures, of rainfalls, and of temperatures, marine and terrestrial. But after all climate is only of interest to the botanist in so far as it demonstrably affects plant distribution, and the majority of the readers of Cybele will rather bless than revile us for the terseness of our paragraph on this subject. The Gulf Stream. — As for the Gulf Stream, we have only to oppose to the opinions of Dr. Murray and the Prince of Monaco cited by Mr. Hart, those of Dr. W. B. Carpenter and Mr. R. H. Scott, F.R.S., of the Meteorological Council. The former in his article " Atlantic Ocean," in the last edition of the Encyclop(zdia Britannica (vol. iii., p. 25) says: — "The same principle once admitted" [the principle of a great oceanic circulation, carrying the cold polar waters southward underneath a northward flow of warm water from the equator] " fully accounts for that amelioration of the cold of north- western Kurope, which, as already .shown, cannot be fairly 58 ' The Irish Naturalist. [Marcb, attributed to the Florida Current or true Gulf Stream."^ Dr. Carpenter (p. 20 of this article) considers the Gulf Stream *' to be no longer recognizable to the east of the meridian of 30*^ W. longitude," and attributes the transport of West Indian tree-trunks, fruits, &c., to the shores of western Europe to a surface drift sustained b}^ the prevalence of S.W. winds. Our second authoritj^ Mr. R. H. Scott, F.R.S., thus delivers him^ self in Notes on Rockall {R.I.A. Tra7is., 1897, p. 63) : " In reply to the question about the Gulf Stream, it is perfectly well defined up to say 50° W. longitude, but I contend no further." We are quite content to differ from Mr. Hart, Dr. Murray, and the Prince of Monaco in such good company as that of Dr. Carpenter and Mr. Scott, and leave it to the reader to decide for himself under which banner he will enlist. We have no strong tendencies to iconoclasm, but since the Gulf Stream threatens to pla}' as thaumaturgical a part in Irish meteorology as Finn and Cuchulainn play in Irish legend, it seems high time to submit its credentials to scientific scrutiny. Irish Pi,ant-Namks. This new feature in the Cybele is founded on inquiries begun by one of us many years before the preparation of the second edition was entered upon. It was with a full knowledge of the work alread}^ done in the same field b}^ Threlkeld, Light- foot, Wade, G'Reill}^ and Cameron that the inquiries were instituted ; but as the investigator aimed merely at the fixing of the more prominent native plant-names actually currejit i?i Ireland it was impossible to make any use of these authorities. Even the latest of them, Cameron, in his Gaelic Names of Plafits, 1883, though he gives in addition to the Scotch Gaelic names a large collection of Irish Gaelic names, does not indicate whether any one of them was taken from other than literary sources. Only one who has himself carried on such inquiries in the field can appreciate their difficulty, and how • A more recent authority, Mr. Dickeson, in the Quarterly Joiirn. Roy. Meteorol. Socy. for October, 1899, contends that " the mild winters of our western coasts are not due to the heating of the air by contact with a surface of warm water, brought by a current from warmer regions . . . but to the fact that the air has itself come from these warmer regions, and is charged with abundant moisture, which sets free vast quantities of heat through condensation." I900.] Coi^GAN AND Scui.i«Y. — Remarks 07i Cybele Hibemica. 59 imperatively they demand the exercise of caution and of patience, if error is to be avoided. The difficulty is two-fold ; first, one must catch correctly the series of vocal sounds which make up the spoken plant-name, some of the elements in the series being obscure or indeed quite elusive ; in the second place, one has to make sure that he applies the spoken name, where not merely generic, to the proper botanical species, and to arrive at certainty on this point it is often necessary to consult several Irish -speaking namers of the plant and compare their dicta. To these difficulties may be added a third, that of rendering the name into the accepted system of Irish orthography. Here a wide field for the imagination is often opened up, and one must carefully check the tendency to strain the rendering of the spoken sounds in such a way as to give the written word a meaning. In many cases one must be content to let the name remain purely symbolic. All this is set down here merely to show that the admitted meagreness of the Cybele list of Irish plant-names is due to conscientiousness and a full appreciation of the difficulties of the subject. Mr. Hart, how^ever, does not seem to feel these difficulties, for he tells us in his Remarks ; " I have myself collected without difficulty, though at a considerable expense of time and travel, a large number of Celtic plant- names in Donegal which do not appear in the Cybele^ Many will be found in an appendix to my Flora of Do7iegair On turning to this appendix, which contains much interesting matter, we find such entries as the following: '' Barrafi a dhu, Fibrous roots of bent or some other sand plant. Futhe7'm (?) seaweed. Meehal, a yellow thick- clustered seaweed. Pardban (?) some herb, very good for making a plaster." Now Mr. Hart is quite justified in saying that such names as these, mere 7iomma iiuda referable to no definite species, may be collected *' without difficulty "; but then unfortunately the collection when made has no scientific value. Farther on in his Remarks, when discussing Euphorbia hiber^ia (p. 37) and Pinus sylvestris (p. 41) he reverts to our treatment of current Irish plant-names. He charges us with both wrongly spelling and wrongly interpreting the native name Baiyuie caoi7i which we give as that now current for the Irish Spurge in Cork and Kerry, the head-quarters of the A 3 6o The hish Naturalist. [March, species. It is not easy to unravel the paragraph in which this charge is made, so contradictory is it and full of unwarrantable assumptions. Mr. Hart's reasoning appears to be somewhat in this fashion : our name, Bainne caoi7i, is wrongly spelt because it is spelt differently from the name, Buidhe na 7iinoea7i, given by O'Reilly ; the interpretation which we give of our name is wrong, because it differs from Mr. Hart's interpretation of O'Reilly's name. Now O'Reilly's name, as Mr. Hart himself admits in this very paragraph of his Remarks^ is a purely generic one ; but for the purpose of his argument, to prove, in short, that we are wrong, it is essential that the name should be made specific and should be applied to Euphorbia hibe??ia. This our critic accordingly proceeds to do, in perfect oblivion of his acceptance of the w^ord as generic and, so far as we can see, without a shred of evidence ; and having further assumed that our name and O'Reilly's are the same, the conclusion inevitably follows, that our Irish spelling is hopelessly wrong, unless we spell better than O'Reilly, and we cheerfully concede that any such assumption is inadmissible. Having thus convicted us of incompetence in spelling, there is little difficulty in convicting us of incom- petence in translation. Mr. Hart, with great intrepidity, in our opinion, englishes O'Reilly's name into " the yellow wave-lover," while we english our name (conjecturally, with a note of interrogation) into " mild milk." It is obvious to the meanest capacity that " mild milk " is different from " the yellow wave-lover," and Mr. Hart's rendering being right ours must be wrong. Therefore we cannot be trusted either to spell or to translate Irish correctly. Is it necessary to assert the obvious fact that Bai7i7ie caoi7i and Buidhe 7ia 7ii7igea7i are utterly distinct names, and to point out that, this fact once grasped, Mr. Hart's argumentative house of cards topples to the ground ? Having in self-defence dealt thus unsparingly with our critic in the matter of the Irish Spurge, we are happy to be able to thank him for fresh information as regards the Scotch Fir. His evidence for the present use of the Irish name gui77ihas ox giiibhas (gyoos) in Donegal is most welcome ; for in spite of Joyce's and Cameron's discussion of this question we did not feel quite satisfied as to the current Irish use of igoo.] CotGAN AND SCUI.I.Y. — Ronarks on Cybele Hibetnica, 6i the name for the living tree as distinguished from the dead bog-deal. Though we have little doubt as to the validity of our conclusion that the vScotch Fir as a native Irish plant " had become quite rare if not extinct in very early times," that conclusion can no longer be based on the absence of a native name for it from the spoken language. But it may fairly be based on its rarity as a component in Irish place- names. We are further indebted to Mr. Hart for his reminder that he has already recorded the survival in Co. Galway of the old name for the Irish Spurge, Meaca?i buidhe (Makinboy of Threlkeld, aiiglice yellow tap-rooted plant). We overlooked his interesting record of this in the Journal of Botany for 1873- To conclude our remarks on this subject, we agree with our critic that an exhaustive work, botanical, philological, and historical on Irish plant-names would be of great interest, and one of us has already ventured to sketch the outlines of such a work in the hope that he may some day succeed in amassing materials sufficiently copious and trustworthy to justify publication. Origin of the Cantabrian Group* However intimate one's acquaintance may be with the laws of plant-life and with the conclusions and theories of geologists, he can never hope to arrive at any very positive opinion on such a question as this. One must studiously guard against any approach to dogmatism in discussing it, and this we have endeavoured to do in our brief paragraph on the subject where we preface our suggestions with these words : '* the hypothesis which regards them" [the Cantabrian group of plants] "as relics of a once widespread pre-glacial flora seems to be the one which, however open to objection, presents the least difficulty." We have little objection to make to Mr. Hart's discussion of this highly debatable question, one with which he is peculiarly fitted to deal by reason of his practical acquaintance with the Arctic flora. He points out most forcibly the great difficulty in the way of accepting the hypothesis we favour, the difficulty, that is, of imagining the Cantabrian group to have survived in Ireland throughout the last Glacial Period. It is a real difficulty; but it is, we conceive, an exaggeration of it to characterise the Cantabrian and Alpine groups as respectively A4 62 The Irish Nahiralist, [March, the most delicate and the hardiest members of our flora. Judged b}^ the vertical range of its members in Ireland, the Cantabrian group is hy no means so sharply distinguished from the Alpine in power of endurance, as Mr. Hart maintains. For instance, Saxifraga umbrosa ranges to 3,370 feet, S. Geuni to 2,650 /eet, Pinguiaila grandiflora to 2,250 feet, Dabcocia polifolia to 1,900 feet. Erica rneditcrranea probabl)' to 1,000 feet ; while on the other hand man}' of our alpines, accustomed in more thoroughl}^ congenial climates to the protection of regularly recurring and persistent winter snow^s, show them- selves impatient of exposure to frost in more temperate climates where this protection is often withheld. It is needless to say that the alternative hypothesis favoured by Mr. Hart is beset by peculiar difficulties of its own. No one who wishes to apprehend the great complexity of such questions should neglect to study Dr. Scharff's erudite paper O71 the Origi^i of the Etiropean Fauiia,^ a perfect treasure-house of the polyglot literature of distributional problems. With a passing reference to one or two expressions in Mr. Hart's very interesting discussion of this question, we must hasten on to our next section. On page 30 he states that the chief peculiarity of the Cantabrian group of plants " is the accidental one that they do not now exist in the neighbouring island." The group being a distributional one it is quite inadmissible to speak of its essential characteristic — locality — as accidental. Again, on p. 33, after touching on the wisdom and veracity of plants which, we are admonished, should be let " speak for themselves" since " they know and they will tell no lies," Mr. Hart insists that hypothetical formula should give way to the ''incontrovertible laws of nature." By all means, but the question is — what are the incontrovertible laws of nature in this complex and largely mysterious domain of plant distribution ? And wdien we have got our wise and veracious plants into the witness-box, who is to interpret for us their inarticulate deliverances? Finally, on p. 31, Mr. Hart says that it was almost a pity to raise this debatable question at all in Cybele. If debatable questions had been rigorously eschewed the book could never have been written. Hardly a page of it is free from debatable matter : a whole ^ Proc. K.I. A., 3rd series, vol. iv., no. 3. I900.] Coi^GAN AND SCUI.I.Y. — Remarks on Cybele Hihcrnica. 63 volume of debate — not alwa^'s parliamentary in its diction — might easil}' be written on the i^ppendix alone ; and after all for many readers these problems of plant distribntion are as fascinating as the problems of metaphysics, and for a like reason, because they are well nigh insoluble. In any case, less than a page of Cybele is devoted to (or wasted on ?) the dis- cussion of the history of the Cantabrian group in Ireland, Omissions. The charges made against us under this head are very numerous. To some of them we plead guilty ; others, and by far the larger number, are not omissions at all in any damaging sense of the word. Tliej^ are not oversights, that is, but deliberate exclusions made on principle. I^et us first deal with the chargers on this point brought against owr Introduction. On page 29 of our critic's Reina?'ks we are charged with the omission of two important plants, the Irish Spurge and the Killarney Fern, from our list of Irish Atlantic Type species (p. xlvii of Cybele). While we at once acknowledge our error as to the Killarney Fern, we wish to point to the inaccuracy of Mr. Hart's statement as regards the Irish Spurge. This is not classified either by Watson or by us as Atlantic, but as Local- Atlantic, or a Local species with an Atlantic tendency. If the t3'pe comparisons between the English and Irish floras are to be made at all a rigid adherence to the limits of Watson's types must be observed. Our error then on this point is only half as serious as Mr. Hart makes it appear. Again, on p. 29, we are charged with having omitted from the Irish Highland T3''pe list no less than four plants, Aira alpina, Cochlcaria alpina, Saxifraga hirta, and S. grcenlandica. Here, in his haste to correct us, our critic has stumbled him- self, for Aira alpina is not omitted from our list : Mr. Hart has simply failed to discover it there under its thin disguise of Deschampsia alpina. As for the remaining three plants, they do not belong to the Highland Type at all, and this can be easily seen by reference to our standard, Watson's Compendiiun of the Cybele Britannica, 1870, where the latest revision of the type is given. When Mr. Hart, at the end of his critical paragraph, on this point asks: "Why should our Irish mountains be deprived of the credit of yielding these plants," 64 The h ish Naturalist. [March, the answer is simpl}' this — that we did no injustice to Ireland in excluding them, but merely a justice to England. Farther on, however, we come to a charge which, unlike this one of imaginary injustice to Ireland, is fully proved against us. On p. 29 Mr. Hart draws attention to our omission from the list of alpines descending to sea-level in Ireland of the following four species : Saxifraga oppositifolia, Ardostaphylos Uva-ursi, Isoetes lacustris, and Carex aquatilis. We are certainly in error here. These plants should be added to the list on p. xlv of our l7itroductio7i, and Mr. Hart is entitled to our thanks for the detection of this oversight. Passing on to p. 36 of the Rema}'ks, we are confronted with a portentous list of no less than 44 items described by our critic as ** a few omissions, &c., which are not dependent on information unavailable for the purposes of the Cybele." On analysis this list turns out to be a critical miscellany, by no means restricted to supposed omissions of our critic's records. Ofthese, however, it includes some 23 items which we shall deal with in groups. The following 6 were omitted as dubious for various reasons : Ra^iunctdus heterophy litis, R. Lingua, Thalic- trumfiexuosumy Helianthenium vulgare, Saxifraga hypiioides, and Atriplex fariiiosa. Eleven others were omitted as superfluous, i.e., Papaver Argemo7ie, Nasttirtium palustre, Sisy^nbritim thalia- nuni, Viola hirta, A^idromeda polifolia, Atriplex portiilacoides, Juniperus nana, Epipadis latifolia,Ophrys apif era, Carex riparia, and Phleum arenariiim. It seems to us that Mr. Hart has least of all Irish botanists any reason to complain that his work has not been given due prominence in the 2nd edition of Cybele. That it was necessary in compiling the book to make a selection from the vast mass of available material is sufficiently obvious. The remaining 6 items of these 23 are perhaps true omissions, that is, omissions by oversight. They are as follows : Arenaria trijiervia and Festuca sylvatica (omitted for District IV.), Taraxacum officijiale var. palustre (omitted for XI.), Arithemis 7iobilis (vertical range omitted), Agrostis vulgaris, var. pu7nila (not credited to Mayo and the Galtees), and Selagi7iella selaginoides (descent to sea level in Donegal omitted). This small number of omissions will be reduced to 4 if, as we are inclined to believe, the MS. referred to by Mr. Hart as lent to one of the editors did not reach him early enough to be availed of, and two of the omitted records. igoo,] CoiyGAN AND Scuimersa^ Halid. {submarina, Fairm.), and D. siyiuaticollis, Muls. and Rey. [s'^assa, Muls. and Rey.). Both have been taken in Ireland, D. mersa at Portraine and Baldoyle, while of D. siymaticollis, Canon Fowler {Ent. Mo. Mag., XX., p. 168) writes that M. Javet had specimens sent him from Ireland by Haliday, and Mr. Champion (/.^.) states that " there is a small form in Mr. Mason's collection, probably found by Haliday in Ireland." It seems likely that these specimens were found, like those of D. mersa, in Co. Dublin, but it is not impossible that they may have been taken on the coast of Co. Down ; consequently it is an open question, and remains for solution by the Dublin and Belfast field naturalists, so let them polish up their optic nerves, and sally forth on sunny days and see who will win. Poyntzpass. 1 Cranmore is now part of Belfast. f4 The Irish Naturalist. [March, BRITISH DRAGONFLIES. British Dragonflies (Odonata). By W. J. Lucas, B.A., F.E.S. Pp. xiv. and 356, 27 coloured plates, and 57 figures in text. London : L. Upcott Gill, 1900. Price ^i \\s. 6d. Students of the less well-known orders of British insects have received much encouragement in recent years bj' the publication of reliable text- books dealing in detail with the species which inhabit our islands. Mr. Lucas' long-promised monograph on our Dragonflies will take a high place among such books. The first fifty-four pages are devoted to introductory matter, the life- history of Dragonflies, the forms assumed by their eggs and nymphs, the structure of the imago, and the place to be assigned to the group among the insects generall}'. Mr. Lucas is undoubtedly right in claim- ing for them ordinal rank. The chapter on the early stages is especially good, and a synoptical table of the nymphs of the various British species should prove useful. The account of the structure of the imago is rather weak morphologically; one does not expect nowadays to have the " lower lip" of an insect described as an unpaired organ comparable to the labrum. The internal organs are almost altogether neglected. Careful synoptical tables of the families, sub-families, genera and species, lead on to the systematic portion, which occupies the bulk of the volume. The author may be congratulated on the full way in which he has dealt with each species ; he traces the synonymy, transcribes the diagnosis of the original describer, gives careful original descriptions of both sexes of the imago, as well as of the egg and nymph when known, and furnishes interesting notes on habits, migration, and distribution. As the account of each species necessarily occupies several pages, specific names should have been used as page-headings, in addition to the generic titles. In nomenclature Mr. Lucas follows De Selys Long- champs and M'Lachlan, rejecting the replacement of Gomphns by Acshna and Caloptoyx by As^n'on, which Kirby believes to be required by the law of priority. Though in our own two or three papers on Dragon- flies we followed Kirby, we now consider that eminent systematist to have needlessly upset established usage. Mr. Lucas, however, is not justified in retaining hchmira as a generic name among the Odonata; it belongs properly to a genus of scorpions, and Kirby's Micronytiipha must be substituted. The distribution of each species within the British Isles is carefully given, so fai as known, under counties for England and Scotland, and provinces for Ireland. With regard to Irish records, Mr. Lucas has had to rely almost entirely on the notes in De Selys Longchamps' " Libellules d'Europe," and on King's " Neuropterous Fauna of Ireland." Very little has been done since the publication of the latter work in 1888 to extend our knowledge of Irish Dragonflies, and such large and conspicuous species as Libelliila depressa and Cordulegastcr annulaius still rest their claim 1900.] British Df'ago7iflies. 75 to a place in the Irish list on De Selys Longchamps' testimony. One species which Mr. King seems not to have seen in Ireland, but which is recorded by the great Belgian entomologist from this country, we can certify from personal observation to be rather widely distributed here — the familiar Calopieryx virgo. We must protest against the inclusion of the Channel Isles in Great Britain ; geographically they most un- doubtedly belong to France. And it is to be regretted that, except in a few cases, the foreign range of the species is not mentioned. Mr. Lucas seems to ignore the "Lusitanian " element in our fauna, as he expresses surprise that a south-western form like Oxygastra C//r/«zV should occur in the British Island at all. To students of distribution it is of great interest to find a Dragonfly belonging to the same faunistic group as Helix pisana or Etirynehria complajiata. The volume concludes with useful practical chapters on breeding the nymph, and preparing the imago for the collection. The illustrations are all good, the coloured plates being exceptionally clear and well- executed. We have no doubt that this excellent monograph will be heartily welcomed by all entomologists, and that encouragement will thereby be given to the study of an order of insects remarkable in the interest of their structure, life-history, and habits. G. H. C. SIvIME FUNGI. The Wlycctozoa. By the RT. Hon. Sir Edward Fry and Agnes Fry. Pp. i.-viii., 1-82, with twenty-two figures in the text. London : Knowledge Office, 1900. This little book, costing only one shilling, forms an excellent intro- duction to the study of a group of interesting organisms now generally regarded as perhaps the lowest of the fungi. There is probably no group of plants better supplied with illustrated guides to aid in its investigation than this one of the slime fungi. Lister, Massee, and now, in America, M'Bride, have prepared well-illustrated text-books, and to these the book under consideration serves as a useful introduction. Though elementary it yet contains nothing that must be unlearned when the larger books are taken in hand. The illustrations are dis- tinctly good, and add much to the educational value of the book. The Mycetozoa have been almost entirely neglected by our Field Club members, though full of interest from many points of view. Recorders of additions to the Irish Flora have almost a clear field before them, and, once made familiar with the use of the compound microscope, can become their own instructors in this peculiar group. One member of the group — Plasmodiophora brassicct, Wor.— is the cause of the well-known disease in turnips, &c., called " finger and toe," " anbury," " club-root," &c., a disease very prevalent in the West and other parts of Ireland. Other plant-diseases have been attributed to other slime fungi, but the group is chiefly of interest to the lover of natural history, and it is to be hoped that Sir Edward Fry's easy and pleasant introduction will cause some Reader of the Irish Naturalist to make a hobby of the Irish Mycetozoa. T.J. 76 The Irish Naturalist. [March, OBITUARY. PrOFEvSSOR J. F. ilODGKvS, M.D. The late Dr. Hodges was for niany years a very well-known member of Belfast society. He began life as a practising physician in Down- patrick, having studied at Dublin and Glasgow. Subsequentl}' he studied agricultural chemistry under Baron von Liebig, and took out the degree of MD. in the University of Giessen. Returning to Ireland, he took a leading part in founding the Chemico-agricultural Society of Ulster in 1S45, and was appointed professor of chemistr}- in the old Belfast College, and shortly afterwards he exchanged this post for the chairs of agricultural chemistry and medical jurisprudence in Queen's College, Belfast, which chairs he occupied till his death. He was the author of several books on agricultural chemistry, and his important researches in this science brought him honours from almost every European country. He held for many years the post of Government analyst, and was also analyst for the City of Belfast, and for five adjoining counties. He passed away in December, at the ripe age of 84 years. PROCKKDINGS OF IRISH SOCIETIES. RoYAi, Zooi^oGiCAiy Society. Recent gifts include Long-eared Owls from Miss Bowerman and Mr. P. Grove, a Badger from Mr. R. J. Ussher, and a pair of Tigers from the Nizam of Hyderabad (given through Lord Roberts). A Llama has been born in the gardens, and a pair of Ostriches, a Bactrian Camel, and a Kangaroo, have been bought. 4,429 persons visited the gardens in January. The Annual Meeting of the Society was held on January 30th at the Royal College of Physicians, and the Report of the Council then pre- sented records most satisfactory progress. The admissions to the gardens show an increase of 24,000 visitors, and the receipts of £,2)^o as compared with those of the previous year. This advance is justifiably ascribed to the increased attractions in the gardens. A new house for Ungulates has been built, and the Bears' dens have been greatly improved ; while the Haughton Memorial Building, with its pleasing outdoor cages and upstairs refreshment-room (now open on Sundays as well as week-days), has proved a great pleasure to visitors. The Council hope soon to be in a position to erect a new Lion house, which will cost at least ^^1,500. The breeding-stock of Lions has been strengthened by the importation of a Nubian male, "Prince" — who has become the father of three fine cubs by the imported Somali lioness " Germania." The old Dublin strain is represented by another litter of three by " Caesar," out of " Hypatia." The latter lioness unfortunately refuses to rear her offspring, but a satisfactory foster-mother has been found in an Irish Red Setter, The comparison between the Dublin-bred Lion, " Caesar" and '* Prince," wiU be interesting to zoologists : — T90O'] Pi'oceedings of Irish Societies, 77 "By the process of artificial selection which has been carried on in Dublin, the size of the lion, and also the height of the hind-quarters, has been considerably increased ; but there has been a loss in the depth of the chest, and in the strength of the forequarters.'' The young Camel born on ihe 6th March, after a gestation of 386 days (the first event of the kind in Ireland) unfortunately died when six days old, and the mother also succumbed a few months later. Great regret is expressed at the death of the Chimpanzee, "Tom," and the rare Hainan Gibbon— which had both lived nearl}' five years in the gardens. We may mention that the latter specimen may now be seen stuffed in the Dublin Museum, while the dead Chimpanzee has been exported to Cambridge. Limerick Fiei.d Ci^ub. January 9.— Annuai, Meeting and Conversazione.— The Seventh Annual Meeting of the Limerick F'ield Club was held in the Athenaeum. There was a large attendance of members. A collection of botanical, geological, and entomological specimens, photographs, and scientific apparatus were shown. The Rev. J. Dowd, K.A., in the absence of the President, Dr. W. Fogerty, took the chair. Mr. F. Neale, Hon. Secretary, read the annual report, of which the following is an abstract: — "The Committee, at the close of another year, are again able to state that much interest has been taken in the Club, its winter meetings and summer excursions having been very well attended. They have also, however, again to draw attention to the continued scarcity of workers, and seriously ask members to identify themselves as students with some section of the Club. Your Committee, after full and careful consideration, have decided to recommend that Rule 6 be altered, so as to provide that each year shall end with the month of September, and that each member shall contribute a subscription of five shillings per annum. On the larger but still very moderate fee, your Committee hope it may be possible to increase the usefulness and activity of the Club, and to arrange for the better, if gradual, furnishing of its room with accom- modation for specimens and photographs, as well as the hire or purchase of diagrams, &c., for lectures. It is also desirable that some books of reference should be available in connection with the Club, as well as magazines and periodicals bearing on the objects of its various sections. Your Committee have pleasure in reporting the completion of arrange- ments with G. H. Carpenter, B.Sc. (London), of the Science and Art Museum, Dublin, for the delivery by him of a course of six lectures on zoology, in March next. The membership of the Club on the 30th September, 1898, was 243, the number to same date in 1899 being 270. " Several botanical specimens have been added to the Club Herbarium during 1899, more especially from amongst the plants characteristic of the Burren district of County Clare, of which several examples are on view this evening. "An interesting addition has been made to the fauna of this locality — a cave-dwelling spider (^Meta Menardii), of which nests and specimens yrerc taken during the year near Kildimo, Co- Limerick, and nests with 78 The Irish Naturalist.' [March, eggs near Quin, Co. Clare. vSeveral species of butterflies not usually common with us occurred during the past summer, one of which, the Clouded Yellow {Colias editsa), is of more than ordinary interest. Our single specimen is from ^louutshannon, w^here it was taken early in August, but it occurred also at Adare, Limerick, and Foynes. Another butterfly, the Painted Lady {Pyrameis cardui), has been noticed in the past year at Cratloe, Mountshannon, and elsewhere in this district, only one other example having been observed since 1890, near Kilkishen, Co. Clare. A full-grown caterpillar of the Brimstone Butterfly {^Gonopteryx rhainnt) was found wdien the Club visited Holy Island, Lough Derg, on the 13th July, additional specimens having been obtained later in the season ; also near Mountshannon, on which occasion they were seen on the same day in three stages— larva, pupa, and imago. "During the year a notice has appeared in one of the scientific magazines as to a member of the grasshopper family swimming in water. This habit had been reported by this Club on several occasions, the first of them being about six years ago ; and it is satisfactory to have it confirmed now, as some doubt w^as thrown on the accuracy of the record at the time. '* Good jwork has been accomplished by the Photographic Section of the Club, members of which have furnished illustrations for the valuable work on St. Mary's Cathedral published during the year by the Rev. James Dowd, B.A. Several geological slides prepared by our members have been accepted as suitable by the committee of the British Associa- tion for the Advancement of Science. " The Archaeological Section of the Club has not developed to the ex- tent hoped for, and it appears difiicult to arouse an interest in connection with it or in the study of local history. "The following meetings took place during the year: — January loth, '99— Sixth Annual General Meeting. January 31st, '99 — " A Ramble through some of the Ancient Monuments of Kerry with a Photographer," by Mr. P. J. Lynch, M.R.I.A. P'ebruary 14th, '99 —" Architectural Photograph}'." March 14th, '99 — " Practical Points in Exposure, Develop- ment, and Printing." March 28th, '99—" Historic Limerick, The Old Towm," illustrated with lantern transparencies, by Rev. James Dowd, p. A. April loth, '99 — Exhibition of Prize Lantern Slides. October 31st, '99 — "The Life History of Ferns," illustrated, b}^ the President. November 14th, '99 — ''Transformation Scenes, or Chapters in Insect Life," by Mr. John L. Copeman, Vice-President, Cork Field Club. November 28th, '99 — " Common Objects of the Sea Shore," illustrated by lantern slides and specimens, by Mr. Wm. Gray, M.R I.A., Hon. Sec, Belfast Field Club. December 12th, '99 — "Archaeology," by Rev. Timothy Lee, Administrator. "Excursions. — April 20th — Broadford, via Parteen and Sallybank. May 4th — Ballycar and Newmarket. June 8th — Scattery Island. July 13th — Holy Island, Lough Derg. July 27th — Clare Glens. " The Club Journal, issued in June last, is held by common consent to have been the best yet published. It contained matter representing 1900.] Pfoceedi7igs of Irish Societies, 79 each section, and several good illustrations, these latter being in con- nection with an address on " Old Limerick,"" delivered during the winter session." The report was adopted. The following were elected officers for the year 1900: — President — Dr. W. A. Fogerty. Vice-Presidents — Miss Alice Do34e ; Rev. Timothy Lee, Administrator. Hon. Treasurer — Mr. Joseph Stewart. Hon. Secretary — Mr. Francis Neale. Hon. Secretary of Photographic Section — Dr, G. J. Fogarty. Committee— Miss Buubury, Miss Bbrill, Mr. W. Ebrill, Mr. P. J. Lynch, CK- ; Mr. J. Fitzgerald-Windle, C.B. ; Mr. George Scott, Mr. B. Barrington. The following were the exhibits : — Selected specimens of dried plants from the Club Herbarium: a collection of local limestone fossils; lantern slides, prints, and enlargements, by members of the Photographic section ; Miss Bennis — Mounted examples of mosses, &c. ; W. W. Cooke (Pigott & Co.)— Phonograph ; W. A. Fogarty, ALA., M.D.— Microscopes ; Miss Garnett — A potato ; MisS Haughton^ — Abnormal Calhma vulgaris ; Mrs. Neale— Fasciated willow stems; F. Neale — Butterflies, Colzas ediisa, Pyrameis cardtn, Gonopteryx rhamni ; nest with eggs of cave spider Meta menardii. Dubinin Naturai^ists' Fie:i,d Ci,ub. November 14. -The President (R. LI. Praeger, B.A.) in the chair. About forty members and visitors w^ere present. Prof. Grenvii,i,E a. J. CoivE read a paper entitled "The Floor of a Continent, with special reference to the older rocks of Ireland." The paper was illustrated by lantern-slides. Prof. Cole explained how little we know as to the real primitive crust of the globe. Even the oldest masses that are brought by earth-movement to the present surface may have been formed by mutual intrusion of molten rocks, long after the first consolidation of the crust. The old crust may have been broken up again and again, before our earliest surviving sediments were laid down. Various Archaean areas in Europe were described and illustrated, and Sir A. Geikie's views were quoted, to the effect that the ancient gneiss of Loch Carron, in Scotland, includes earlier sediments, and is not in itself a fundamental rock. The author described his own similar conclusions, derived from a study of eastern Tyrone and southern Donegal. The sedimentary or schistose series included in the Irish gneiss may well, however, be of Archaean age. It is questionable if we know anywhere, even in the American Laurentian, a truly " fundameutal" gneiss. As yet, w4th our knowledge of some twelve miles at most of the thickness of the present crust, we are worse ofi^ than a fly crawling on the dome of St. Peter's, and endeavouring to estimate the nature of the complex structure beneath his feet. Dr. W. R. EvanS and Dr. A. H. Foord spoke on the subject of the paper. Mr. W. A, Cunnington, Mrs. Herdman, Mrs. W. P. Robinson, and Miss J. F. Thomson were duly elected members of the Club, and two candi- dates were nominated for election at the next meeting. 8o The Irish Naturalist. [March, NOTES. We have pleasure in drawing attention to the excellent plate which accompanies Mr, Wright's paper in the present number. The half-tone block from which it is printed was presented to the Irish Nattwalist by the makers, Messrs. W. and G. Baird, of Belfast, who have recently set up the most complete installation of process-block machinery to be found in Ireland. The excellence of their work is sufficiently shown by their reproduction of Mr. Welch's drawing. BOTANY. MOSSES. Sphag^nutYi tnedlutn, Liinpr'., In Ireland. In \.\i^ Jounml of Botany for January, 1900, Mr. Harold W. Mornington describes and figures Sphagniini viediuni, Limpr., which he says, "has been frequently gathered and is generally distributed throughout these islands. It has been long known as the purple form of S. cymbi- folium, the var. purpurasans of Russou, but the identity of which with vS". medium appears to have hitherto escaped notice. The first record seems to be that from Witherslack Moss, Westmoreland, specimens from which, gathered by Barnes in 1872, were issued in Braithwaite's Sphagn. Brit. Exsicc. as S. cymbifolium var. purpiirascens, Russ. To Mr. Stabler belongs the credit of first recognizing S. medium as a British species, it being included in his ' Hepaticie and Musci of Westmoreland ' {Naturalist, 1898, 124)." In August, 1899, [ had the pleasure of a tramp on Foulshaw Moss between Kendal and Morecambe Bay, in Westmoreland, in company with Mr. Stabler and the Rev. C. H. Waddell, when the former pointed out S. mediiun growing among the heather. Foulshaw is a wide peat moss, reminding one very much of the Bog of Allan, Up to that time I had no knowledge of 5. medium, and was not aw^are that a moss which I had gathered on the margin of the Bog of Allan, at Geashill, King's Count}-, in 1890, and had named S. papillosum var. eonfertum, was actually S. medium, but so Mr. Mornington, who has a portion of m}- specimen, states in his paper from which I am quoting. The locality where I gathered S. medium is the same as that in which I found S. Austiniy another very rare moss. Both these plants should be looked for in other places in Ireland, and their discovery ought to incite byologists to search some of our extensive bogs. S. medium resembles in size, habit, and general appearance S. cymbi/olium, " but with the tufts variegated, dappled with green and red to violet- purple. It varies to some extent in the arrangement of the branch- leaves, but preserves in nearly all cases a facies by which it can be readily detected." The crucial point which Mr. Mornington describes and illustrates by drawings, is that " the chlorophyllose cells in cross section are small, elliptical, central and completely enclosed on both sides by the biplane hyaline cells," which is not the case in the leaf*structure of any other Sphagnum. I900.] Notes, 8 1 To see this requires the use of a i-inch and a ^-inch objective on the microscope, and to make a section of a leaf. Dr. Braithwaite recom- mends, in making sections of leaves of Sphagnum^ '' to enclose the wet branch in a split vial cork, and tie them tight, then with a razor to make very thin slices of the whole, placing them in a few drops of water on a slide, when they will immediately expand, and the cork may be picked X)ut with a needle." I have often obtained good results b}' this method. But when I can obtain a turnip — preferably a Swedish turnip — I always use it, because it does not blunt the razor as cork does, and it is equally clean to work with. I cut a cylinder of turnip to fit tightly into the tube of a simple microtome, in the end I make a cut into which I insert a branch of the Sphagnum that is to be sectionized, and keeping it wet, cut with a razor. It is not necessary to make absolutely perfect s&ctions of \.\ie Sphagnum leaf in order to see the arrangement of the cells ; rather thick ones are sufficient. But an essential point in examining them under the micro- scope is not to put a cover glass on the object, just examine in water and uncovered, any pressure rendering it difficult if not impossible to see the arrangement of the beautifully delicate cells. Loughbrickland. H. W. LETT. ZOOLOGY. BIRDS. Bittern near Londonderry. On loth January, Mr Daniel Deeney shot a fine specimen of the Bittern {BoUiurus stellaris, Linn.) at Burnfoot, about five miles from Londonderry. This is another rarity for the Inch district. Londonderry. D. C. CampbeiQrry.—F2deS. A. Stewart. Excepting this last, and the two contributed by the Rev. K. S. Marshall, specimens from all these localities have passed through my hands ; and I am well assured these three exceptions were also rightly named. It is a little remarkable that A. filicaiilis, Buser, should be twice as well distributed as either of the other two. In England and Scotland, the type is nearl)^ as widely distributed ; but A. alpeslris, Schmidt, being seldom found except in subalpine situations, is naturally more restricted. Bournemouth. 94 The Irish Naturalist. [April, A NKW WATER MITE FROM UI.STKR. BY J. N. HALBKRT. [Read before the Dublin Naturalists' Field Club, March 13th, 1900. J During the summer and autumn of lastj^ear Mr. W. F. de V. Kane very kindl}- sent to the Museum several small collections of water mites, captured while dredging for Kntomostraca in various localities in the North of Ireland. One of these gatherings, made towards the end of September in Upper lyough Erne, contained several rarities, among the rest a most interesting Arrcnujms, in structure quite unlike any of the previously-known British species. This specimen was subsequent!}' lost. About a month later Mr. Kane ver}^ fortunately succeeded in capturing both sexes of what is without doubt the same species in a lake in the County of Monaghan, and from these specimens the following notes have been made. The newly-discovered mite is of considerable interest, as the only known lorm at all resembling it in structure is a Swedish species, Arrenuriis 7iobilis, described by Neuman^ in 1880. Acarefulcomparisonof the Irish mite with the description and figures of A. nobilis shows that, although they are evidently closely allied forms, the}^ cannot be united under the one specific name, and in this opinion I am supported by Dr. R. Piersig, of Annaberg, to whom drawings have been submitted. It may be worth noting that Neuman's species has apparently not been detected b}^ recent workers, and no trace of his unique example is now to be found amongst the remnants of his collection preserved in the Gotenburg Museum. ^ The species oi Arre7i2crus are amongst the most beautiful of the HydraduiidcB. They are remarkable for the hard skin, which is always more or less coarsely granulated, and the great specialization in structure attained by the males. The species are comparatively numerous, and are as a rule very brightly coloured. The species has been named after its dis- coverer, who has been instrumental in bringing to light many rare forms from our northern lakes ^ " Om Sveriges Hydrachnider," Kongl. Svcnsk. Vet. Akad. Hand!., xvii., No. 3. ^ Zoolog. Anzeigcr^ xx., 1897, p. 333. L900.1 HalbkrT. — A Nciv Water Mite from Ulster. 95 Arrenurus Kanel, sp. nov. Mai.e (Figs. T, 2, 3). — Length, including appendage, 1-2 mm., breadth, 088 mm. Colour yellow, tinged in places with green and with reddish-brown blotches. Legs and epimera pale green. Body oval, very gradually narrowed in its posterior half, thence suddenly contracted and produced into a well-defined appendage (length 0-22 mm., breadth at base o 32 mm.) The '' impressed line " encloses a considerable portion of the dorsal surface, is widely rounded in front, bent outwards in the middle, and terminates on the side of the appendage. On the back is a double row of circular depressions, and near these, springing from small papillie, are a few long hairs. The body of the animal, as well as being coarsely granulated, shows a very distinct longitudinal striation. The posterior end of the main appendage is furnished on each side with several pairs of hairs, the arrangement of Fig. I. Fig, 2, Fig> I, Arrenurus Kanei, sp. nov., Male, dorsal view without legs or palps. Fig. 2, Male, lateral view. Magnified. which can be best seen in Figure i. The male genitalia are remarkably complex, from the end of the main appendage projects a trilobed trans- parent appendage"" (length 004 mm.) — the " hyalines hautchen" of German writers— close to this on each side is a small outwardly-cui-ved horn. Below the processes just described lies the comparatively long petiolus (length Q-iS mm.) which is cylindrical, somewhat widened about the middle, and bent upwards at the apex. This is again enclosed by two transparent club-shaped organs, which meet just beyond and beneath the free end of the petiolus. As in the case of the latter these spring from the ventral surface of the main appendage. Epimeral plates very large, together with the genital area occupying most of the under side of the body. The legs and palpi are of the normal type, the former being rather long and robust, the fourth segment of the last pair carr3dug a curved spur at the apex. * In the Lough Erne specimen this appendage is decidedly longer than in the Monaghan example, A4 9^ The Irish Natnralist. [April, Femai^e (Fig 4).— Length 1-4 mm., greatest breadth roS mm. The body is strongly narrowed in front, " impressed line" enclosing most of the dorsal surface ; as in the male there is a double row of depressions down the middle of the back, and the body is striated. Kpimeral plates very much smaller than in the male ; close to the last pair lies the genital area. In general shape the female of this mite is not unlike that of A. albator, Miiller. Fig. 4. Fig. 3, Arreuiims Kanei, sp. nov., Male, ventral view of hinder region. Fig. 4, Female, ventral view. INIagnified. LoCAi^iTiES. — Upper Lough Erne, September 20th, 1S99 (one male) ; Uartrey Lough, in the County of Monaghan, October, 1899 (one $ and three p p). T3-pe specimens now in the Dublin Museum. Science and Art Museum. Dublin. AN IRISH GEOGRAPHY. Elcnncntary Geography for Irish Schools. By John Cooke, M.A. (Dubl.). London : John Murray, 1899 ; pp. i.-x. and 1-114. This work is one of the many signs of the changes that may be expected in Irish education. It is an attempt to interest the elementary' pupil from the outset in the country in which he lives, and to employ its natural features as illustrations of those prominent throughout the globe. Such an ideal could not be reached in countries of more uniform structure, Holland, for example ; but Ireland fortunately lends itself on all sides picturesquely to the purpose. The introduction, on general principles of Geography, gives us a view and plan of Londonderry for comparison ; and similar treatment of Glendalough, in Co. Wicklow, illustrates the forms of mountain-sides and valleys. Some of the Irish illustrations, prettily reduced from photographs, are given without names, which seems a break in the general plan of the volume ; and surely by inadvertence, a false impression is conveyed when it is stated in the preface that " all the plans, maps, and illustrations have been specially prepared for this book." This is true of the mechanical process-blocks ; but they are made in great part from the photographs I900.] A7i Irish Geog7'aphy. 97 issued by Mr. Welch for the North of Ireland, and by Mr. Lawrence for the South, .Mr. Welch comes ofif rather badly, for his fine peak above Doo Lough, in Co. Mayo, on p. 24, receives no title at all, while his Slieve Bearnagh, in the Mourne Mountains (p. 25), is ascribed to a mountain- range in "Co. Antrim," where mountain-ranges are conspicuously absent. Mr. Lawrence's Bridge of Lismore, on p. 32, is said to be in Co. Cork. Mr. Cooke knows Ireland so intimately, that these details must be held to show signs of haste in the serious task of preparing a " first- book of science." The maps are in duplicate, one series being photographed from raised models without place-names ; the other maps contain the names of countries on a uniform red ground, as a sort of key to the valuable physical map that precedes each throughout the volume. The treat- ment of the principal features of the globe (pp. 38-74) is on the old- fashioned lines of treating the rivers apart from the mountains, the capes apart from the islands, and so on. Thus, on p. 65, the Balkan Peninsula, Corea, Labrador, Alaska— why is Alaska a peninsula? — and Yucatan occur ^together, of course with others, as a list of the "peninsulas of the world." We have no doubt that some current curriculum hampers the author, and brings down his admirable ideals into these regulation grooves. Ireland, however, occupies pp. 75-114, and is written for the most part graphically, and with the enjoyment born of personal knowledge. No attempt is made to correlate or explain the various features; and probably this is left for lessons in Physical Geography. It is impossible, of course, to " explain everything," like the mother of Lady Windermere ; but a word in season would, at any rate, check the spread of some romantic fallacies, such as those, for example, which gather round the Giants' Causeway. This object is, by-the-by, stated on p. So to be 400 feet high. We note also, on p. 86, that an explanation is put forward as to the petrifying properties of the waters of Lough Neagh. The petrified wood in question, however, is silicified, and is washed out from the Cainozoic plant-beds ; its occurrence has, we believe, nothing to do with the modern waters of the lake, despite two centuries of tradition. We seem to be pointing out flaws in this pleasant and original little book ; but they are mainly such as result from the limitations imposed upon the author. A work on the same lines for secondary schools, con- necting the structure and surface- features of Ireland with the adjacent island of Great Britain, and thence in a broad way with continental Europe, may, perhaps, follow from the same pen, and would carry out the promise that cannot be perfectly fulfilled in these 114 excellently printed pages. G. A. J. C. 98 The Irish Naf?(ralisf. [April, PROCEEDINGS OF IRISH SOCIETIES. RoYAi, Zooi.oGiCAiv Society. Recent gifts include a pair of Black-headed Gulls from Dr. C. J. Patten, a Monkey from Mr. T. Broome, and a Barn Owl from Mr. A. Thomson. 3,646 persons visited the Gardens in February. Dublin Microscopic.\Tv Club, January 18. —The Club met at Leinster House, Mr. Greenwood PiM in the chair. It was announced that Mr. Andrews wished to resign the presidency of the Club, and Mr. Pirn was unaniiuously elected to the vacant office. Dr. J. A. Scott was appointed Vice-President, Mr. F. W. Moore, Hon. Secretary, and Mr. \V. N. Allen, Hon. Treasurer. Some proposed alterations in the rules were discussed, and a decision thereon postponed until the next meeting. Prof. T. Johnson exhibited a preparation of a sclerotium of the fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, taken from a diseased Jerusalem artichoke,^ grown at Greystones, from " seed" imported from England two years in succession and each year increasingly diseased. The disease is due to the same fungus as that which helps to cause the 3'ellow-blight in potato-plants in the west and other parts of Ireland. The material was- received from Miss Hughes. Mr. Henry J. Seymour showed photo-micrographs of rock- sections, and also a thin section of a peculiar silicified limestone from Slane, Co. Meath. This rock was originally a fossiliferous and oolitic limestone of Carboniferous age, and contained some minute quartz- granules. Subsequently the carbonate was almost entirely dissolved away and replaced by secondary silica, which has grown in optical continuity around the original quartz-granules as a nucleus. The result has been the formation of a mesh-work of interlacing acicular crystals of quartz, many of which are bi-pyramidal. So gradual has been the replacement, of the calcium carbonate, that the concentric rings of the " oolite" are perfectly preserved as pseudomorphs in silica, and may be seen passing through as many as five or six independent quartz crystals. Mr. J. N. HalberT exhibited living examples of the '* Mud Mite," Limnochares holosen'cea, Lat. In its structure and habits this species forms a connecting link between the true water mites (^HydrachnidcR) and the land mites (7>i?W(^/fl^/«/w, &c.). Only the one species is known, which is not uncommon at the bottom of pools and semi-stagnant water in the neighbourhood of Dublin. February 15. — The Club met at Leinster House. Mr. Greenwood Pim, President, showed a very curious mould, Botryiis dichotoina. The specimen which had been in his possession since 1874 was mounted dry, and was in perfect preservation. It consisted of rather thick hyphae, branched dichotomously, and covered with spherical spores, each suppvorted on a short pedicel, resembling very short, round- headed pins. It occurred on a decaying stem in Mr. Pim's garden, and does not seem to have been found in the British Isles either before or 1900.] Proceedings of Irish Societies. 99 since, as by an oversight it is not included in Mr. Massee's book, and it seemed quite unknown to the members of the British Mj'cological Association to whom it was exhibited in 1898. It agrees exactly with Corda's figure {/cones Fimgonuii). Mr. M'Ardi^E exhibited Lepidozia setacea, Web., var. serhilarioides, Hubeu., which he found on a damp bank at Lough Adoon, Co. Kerry, in September, 1897. From the type it differs in the much elongated stem, longer leaves more distantly placed and of a paler colour. The name was given to this curious form by Hubener, on account of the resemblance it bears to one of the plant-like Hydroids. It is an addition to the cryptogamic flora of Ireland. It is known to occur in Germany and North America. Mr. H. J. Seymour exhibited a photo-micrographic apparatus designed and made by him, and adapted especially for use with low magnifying powers such as are wanted in photographing rock-sections, for which purpose it has been found by him to give excellent results. It consists of a heavy base of wood about three feet by nine inches, and two and a half inches thick.. On this two platforms carrying a microscope and a camera rCvSpectively slide between grooved runners. An incandescent mantle gas-lamp furnishes the illuminating power, the light being condensed by a small lens on to the micro-slide. A novel feature is an extremely simple arrangement for focussing, carried out by a suitable combination of brass rods and binding screws and clamps, such as are used for making electrical connections. The apparatus was shown in working order and explained by the exhibitor. Mr. F. M. SEi^rt,7a^^/^ large, but perhaps make up for this in numbers, as they may always be found on our shores, lurking in little rock-pools and beneath stones and sea-weed. Their food, in common with most crabs, consists of young fish, small shrimps, and suchlike; but they are greedy little things, and no kind of animal refuse seems to I900.] CuNNiNGTON. — Seashove Crabs. 121 come amiss. The eggs, which may be laid at any time from spring to autumn, are buried in the sand, and from them emerge — not young crabs — but forms so perfectly distinct as to have originally received a separate name. We are dealing here then, as in most of the crabs and lobsters, with a distinct metamorphosis, a larval form being set free from the ^%%, which sooner or later however, assumes the adult condition. Though differences, of course, exist between the larval forms of different crabs, the plan followed here is really pretty typical. The little organism on emergence is known as the Zoea larva, and certainly is a most grotesque-looking object, with enormous eyes, and a head shield armed with long spines. From this stage, by the shedding of the skin we get another — the Megalopa — which is certainly far more crab-like, and has the pincers and walking legs developed, though the tail is still in the primitive position, and not tucked up. A third moult, and we have once again a young crab differing but little from the adult. This Green Crab was at one time extensively brought to the markets as food, but is now seldom eaten, except perhaps by the very poor in some parts. It makes very good bait, however, especially when soft, after shedding its shell, and in certain parts of the coast the fishermen have devised a very simple trap to catch them for this purpose. This consists of nothing more than the placing between tide-marks of a number of common half-round roof-tiles. Beneath these convenient shelters, the crabs about to moult naturally creep, so that the fishermen have merely to go at low tide and pick them out. Portiums the Fiddler Crab, and Porttminus are among the commonest of the other Irish swimming crabs, and they, of course, have the oval flattened joint to the last leg, which is so noticeable a feature. The name of " fiddler crab " has been given to Poftunus by the fishermen, because of the see-saw motion of the bent and flattened leg-joints, which is supposed to suggest the operation of fiddling. These forms are both good swimmers, but are eclipsed in this direction by Poly bins, which is perhaps the strongest swimmer of all. The other legs here have also become extremely flat and thin, and by aid of them all, the creature skims about, up to the surface of 122 The Irish Naturalist. [May, the water if need be. It is said that Polybius even pursues active fish like the mackerel, and fastening on to one by its sharp and powerful pincers, holds tight until its victim is exhausted. Another group of curious, and in some cases quite weird- looking crabs, is that containing the s^^ider-crabs. These forms, as their name sufficiently denotes, possess long spidery legs, wdth comparatively small bodies, which latter in this case, are triangle-shaped, with the point directed forwards. Notwithstanding all their long limbs however, they are sluggivSh, slow-moving animals, and in consequence readily fall a prey to fishes and other enemies. Nature, which gene- rally devises some plan for the protection of slow-moving or awkward forms, has here accomplished that purpose in a very interesting way. For years before the true nature of the case was understood, these crabs had specially attracted the attention of observers, from their very untidy appearance. Their shells were generally more or less overgrown by sea- weeds or various kinds of fixed and colonial animals. Fortunately some of these forms have been kept in captivity of recent years, so that their habits have been definitely observed. The crab known as Hyas, which has not really such very long legs, but evidentl}^ belongs to this group, is usually so overgrown by colonies of sea-mats, etc., that its true form is entirely hidden, and one can well believe that it would be well-nigh indistinguishable in its native wilds. But although these organisms are growing happily on the crab's shell, the3^ did not settle there of themselves, as one might perhaps suppose. It has in fact been observed that these crabs, if placed quite clean in an aquarium with sea-weeds and living sea-mats, will actually tear off little bits of them, and deliberately plant them on the back of the shell ! By their marvellous, instinct too, the crabs know well enough what organisms will bear this rather rough-and-ready transplanting, for the pieces they plant are always such as will live and grow. All the observers who have had these interesting creatures under their notice, remark on the effectiveness of the disguise, and in fact there have been cases in which the crab was at first thought to have escaped, from the way in which it had entirely disappeared. 1900.] CuNNlNGTON. — Sea-shore Crabs. 123 Even further than this may the discriminating powers of these crabs be displayed, for not only will they cover themselves with these protective clothes, but they v/ill take them off again if need be. If a Hyas, covered it may be, by bright- coloured sea-weeds, be placed in a tank, containing, for example, more sombre-coloured sponges, the creature will be found after a little while to have diligently plucked off all the bright colours, and covered itself once more with fragments of the surrounding sponge. There is yet another curious feature about Hyas, in which it differs from other spider-crabs. The pincers are ver}^ white and clean, and the creature is seen to keep them constantly moving, in a rhythmic fashion, these white points thus appearing very conspicuous objects, where the animal is almost hidden by its living covering. The meaning of this apparent anomaly was discovered a few years ago by the Messrs. Dixon, formerly of Trinity College, Dublin. On one occasion they happened to introduce into the tank containing a Hyas a number of small gobies. These little fish had their curiosity at once aroused by this white vibrating structure ; but the moment these investigations brought one well within reach of the concealed crab the unfortunate fish was seized and devoured. Thus, you see, the conspicuous whiteness of the claws really acts as a very efficient lure into the neighbourhood of the watchful, but almost invisible crab. Besides Hyas there are several other spider-crabs among the inhabitants of our shore, and the}^ all exhibit more or less this remarkable habit of dressing themselves with the surrounding organisms. Among them I may mention the forms Pisa, Inac/ms, and Macropodia, the I^ong-legged Spider- crab, while Mais sqjiinado, the Spiny Spider-crab, is far the largest of them all. The latter is indeed the largest of all the British species with the exception of the Edible Crab {Cancer pagtcrtis) w^hich, as you know, is sometimes taken of a great size. In some parts it is said to be commonly found as much as nine or ten inches in length. A curious case of companion- ship is sometimes to be made out here, for another little Crustacean, Is^a by name, has been found clinging to the crab's shell, by means of the broad serrated ends of its feet, which are thus specially w^ell adapted for the purpose. Strange to say, this particular form seems to be never found anywhere else. 124 The Irish Naturalist. [May, Go7ioplax the Angular Crab, is another remarkable form, but one which is by no means common on these shores, though it is among the known Irish species. The pincer-legs are here enormously long, while the eyes again are very noticeable by being placed on extremely long stalks. The pincers, further, have the joints so situated that while food can be seized at a considerable distance, it can also be conveyed to the mouth. The male is in the habit of clashing together these great nippers, in a noisy and threatening manner ; or at any rate has been seen to do so when in captivity. The creatures are said to live in burrow^s formed in hardened mud, which dwelling-places they leave open at both ends. They would seem to form a very favourite food for the Cod and such like fishes, for they are not infrequently found in their stomachs. The form Corystes, which is rather more frequently taken on our coast, belongs to a group which, in many ways certainly, seems to carr}' us towards the hermit crabs. The head-shield is considerably longer than broad, while a very striking feature is the length and nature of the antennae. The nippers of the male also are very long, but in the female the claws are very ordinary in size. The back of this creature, at any rate to the vivid imagination of some of the older observers, has con- siderable resemblance to the human features, a fact which has attracted to it far more attention than on that account it deserves. Its popular title of the " Masked Crab" is due to this, and it is very funny to see how in some of the figures by the old writers this supposed resemblance has been purposely accentuated. In its habits, nevertheless, Corystes is so interesting as to well merit our further notice. It is a sand-burrowing form, and the last joints of its legs have become elongated, sharp and claw-like, in connection with this habit. When commencing operations the crab sits upright on the surface of the sand, and by digging its legs in deeper and deeper, pulls itself down, while the claws are engaged in pushing at the sand in front to prevent it getting into the mouth apparatus. When the body has completely disappeared beneath the surface of the sand, the long antennae, which still project, are generally seen to be rubbed against one another, apparently to get rid of any sand sticking to them. Now by placing the antennae side by side, the long hairs fringing them interlock, and the crab is provided with a 1900.] CuNNiNGTON. — Sea-sJiore Crabs. 125 perfect little tube placing him in communication with the outside world. The process of burrowing will then go on still further, until nothing remains visible but the tip of this tube. Resting thus passivelj^ in its bed of sand, Corystes spends the daytime concealed from observation, though at night it apparently comes out, and wanders about in search of food. One operation at an}^ rate — that of respiration — has to be carried on even beneath the sand, and this is effected through the medium of the antennae tube. By experiments in which coloured water was introduced close to the tube of a buried crab, it has been ascertained that the water is always sucked down through it, finally passing out from the gill chambers at the sides. Recalling what is the normal direction for the water flow, it will be seen that the condition here is precisely the reverse. Occasionally, and for a moment or two, apparently when the crab wishes to throw out some objec- tionable particle, the current is changed, and becomes normal in direction. The reason for the existence of this reversed current, as the usual condition, in a buried Corystes, is not far to seek. It is simply the outcome of its burrowing habit, and is a beautiful adaptation to altered circumstances, for it is obviously far more satisfactory to draw water from the clear region overhead than to attempt to suck it in at the sides when buried in sand. Turning to the hermit crabs themselves, we find a number of remarkable features to be noticed in them. The most familiar ones to us, those which live in old whelk-shells and the like, are perhaps rather more like the lobsters ; but among the group, we find some, which very largely fill any gap there may be between these two main divisions. Dromia, a form which has been taken off the southern British coasts, but which is far commoner in the Mediterra- nean, still approximates to the crabs proper, though a good deal of its tail is to be seen in a top view, and the last two pairs of walking legs are almost shifted up on to its back. This creature, too, may do something towards hiding itself by other objects ; one is often found covered by a sponge. Among some foreign allied forms another plan is adopted, where the animal holds tight by its upturned hind legs to a mangrove leaf, or old bivalve shell, which it carries about with it. 126 The Irish Naturalist [May, PorccUana^ too, belongs also to the group of the hermit crabs, and is found on several parts of the Irish coast. This again is crab-like in general appearance ; but on looking more closely we at once notice important differences. The last pair of legs is ver}^ small, and tucked up over the back, in a manner which is characteristic of many of these allied forms, while the tail is not at all of the t5^pical crab form, but possesses those broad wing-like expansions which we notice in the lobster. The feelers, particularl}^ the antennae, are very long in proportion, while the claws are curious great clumsy-looking things. The creatures are usually found under stones, between tide-marks, or else occur in shallow water on a rock}^ bottom. The zoea larva of this form is a truly romantic-looking creature, and one really cannot help 'wondering how it can manage such a long spine at all. The common hermit crabs, such as inhabit old mollusc shells, belong principally to the genera Pagurzis and Eicpao^tincs. Perhaps the commonest of all — the "Soldier Crab," so called — is Eicpagurtis Benihardits. In the greatly elongated condition of the antennae, and in the large size of the tail region we see points of agreement with the lobsters, while the e3'es are here situated upon considerable eye-stalks. Degeneration has most evidently been at w^ork in these forms, for otherwise why should all the tail region be so soft and membranous that the creature is forced to seek protection for it in some shell ? Again in connection with the habit of thus protecting its tender parts, the last legs have become greatly modified— the first two pairs onlj^ remaining normal, for w^alking purposes, while the last two are concerned wdth clinging into the shell. Further, as an adaptation to this mode of life, the tail region, which was primitively quite symmetrical, has acquired this one- sided lateral twisting, and it is most interesting to note that in the earliest stages of their life the young crabs are perfectly symmetrical. In the course of their growth, it stands to reason, that these crabs have several times to move lodgings, so that one may find different-sized animals in a variety of different shells, from the humble periwinkle up to the whelk, a full-sized specimen of which is necessary^ for a well-grown adult crab. Whether the hermit always chooses for his habitation an empty shell, or whether he ma}* not seize and kill the owner of a suitable one, is a point which has not been definitely settled. I900.] CuNNiNGTON. — Sea-shore Crabs. 127 That empty ones are sometimes used I think there can be no doubt ; but at the same time it is quite likely that, under certain circumstances, the Soldier Crab is true to his name, and makes a murderous attack upon some inoffensive snail. A curious habit of companionship, or to give it its more proper name, commensalism, has been noticed in Prideaux's hermit crab, Eiipagums Prideauxii^ which is also common enough on our shores. This creature is seldom found without a sea-anemone-- y4^rtw«<2 by name — living on its shell. Of the mutual advantages to be gained by this association we can at least suggest one or two. The anemone, in course of time, tends to absorb the heav}^ shell of the crab, which would be some advantage, and again, while certain fish are very fond of hermits, which they swallow shell and all, few of them would be much inclined to tackle the sea-anemone. The latter, however, on the other hand, gets its share of advantage, from the crab's moving powers, which take it about from place to place in search of food. And now to return to the practical side of the question. How are crabs to be found, or where are we to look for them ? A crab hunt is neither a difficult nor a very exacting occupation. Go at low water, or when the tide is some wa}- out, to any rocky piece of shore, and search in the rock-pools, and beneath the masses of sea-weed. Turn back the growing patches of bladder-wrack, and look beneath stones, and before long you may be sure to find some little fellows, snugly hidden away. Royal College of Science, Dublin. PROCKKDINGS OF IRISH SOCIETIKS. RoYAi. Z001.0GICA1. Society. Recent gifts include eight Peruvian Cavies from Miss Fennell-White, a Monkey from Mr. E). Marshall, three Bramblings from Mr. E. Williams, a Bear cub and a vSilver Fox from Mr. N. H. P. Vickers a White Pheasant from Ivord F. Fitzgerald, and a Royal Python and a lizard from the Hon. P, C. Smyly. A pair of Racoons, a pair of Hairy Armadilloes, eighteen monkeys, and seven Rose Cockatoos have been bought. 6,963 persons visited the Gardens in March, 128 The Irish Natiiralist, [May, Cork Naturai^IvSTvS' Fiei,d Ci.ub. March 21. AnnuaTv Meeting. — The annual meeting of the Cork Naturalists' Field Club was held in the Assembly Rooms : Mr. T. Farrington, President, in the chair. The Treasurer's report showed that the society began the year with a credit balance of £'] los. gd. The subscriptions for the year amounted to £11 5J., and the expenses, including the usual contribution to the /rzs/i Na/urah'sf, WAS £11 iSs. 6d., leaving a balance to be carried forward of £6 17s. S'L The Secretary's report showed a small falling off in membership during the 5''ear. In all nine excursions were held during the season, amongst the places visited being Ivittle Island, Rochestown, Douglas, Youghal, Macroom, Ardrum, Healy's Bridge. During the winter three lectures were arranged for, one of which was delivered by the President on "Some Relations of the Atmosphere to Plants" on Octobei 19th ; another on December 6th on "Some Paths of Science," by Mrs. B Brooke Hughes, and their season would close that evening with a lecture by Mr. Porter on "The Geology of the Bandon Railway." The Chairman said there was a prospect of improving on one of last year's excursions this year. When they visited Ardrum last 5'ear they had nobody to show them over the place, and they did not get entrance to Ardrum House. If another visit were organised he was informed they would get on better. The meeting then ])roceeded with the election of President and officers for the following year, when the following were appointed: — President, Mr. Farrington ; Vice-Presidents, Miss Martin, Professor Hartog, Messrs. Copeman, Shaw, Bennett, and Lund ; Secretar}-, Mrs. Brooke Hughes; Curator, Mr. R. A. Phillips; Committee, Messrs. D. Franklin, J. Noonan, W. B. Lacy, W. H. Johnson, and F. R. Rohu. Some arrangements having been decided on with regard to the forth- coming excursions, the meeting terminated. NOTES. BOTANY. The Dublin Field Club Prize Scheme. I hope the prizes offered by the Committee of the Dublin Naturalists' Field Club will not result in the diminution of any of our rarer plants. In 1S64 the Royal Horticultural Society of England offered prizes for the best collections of dried wild flowers collected in that year in any part of the United Kingdom, and I well remember the outcry then made by botanists who feared that competitors might imagine that the rarity of a specimen increased the value of the collection. It ought to be made quite clear in the Irish botanical competition of 1900, that there is no inducement held out to gather any rare species whose numbers are diminishing. Rtciiard M. Barrington. Fassaroe, Bray. I900.] Notes. 129 By the courtesy of the Editors we have seen Mr. Harrington's note. The Committee of the Dublin Naturalists' Field Club fully appreciate the value of his suggestions, and indeed had already stipulated that any collection which bore evidence of undue interference with rare plants or animals should be thereby disqualified, and it was only by inadvertence that this was omitted from the printed rules. Intending competitors will therefore note this. N. H. AWCK,) jj^^ Secretaries. C. J. Patten, > Trinity College, Dublin. Irish Topographical Botany. For four years past T have been engaged on a work which proposes to show the distribution of flowering plants, &c., in Ireland, so far as present information goes, in the forty divisions (counties or portions of counties) into which, in a paper published in 1896 m the Journal of Boiajjy and Ii-jsh Naturalist, I divided the country. The work is now sufficieuth'^ far advanced to show the deficiencies in each of the count}' lists. A number of common plants still remain unrecorded from all but a few counties, and plants of frequent occurrence are still wanted from almost every county. I shall esteem it a great favour if readers of the I.N. will assist the completion of the county lists in either of the following ways : — T. By furnishing me with unpublished notes of plants observed in any part of Ireland. A definite record of any species in any county, giving place, finder's name, and date, will be welcome. 2. By searching in any county for plants still unrecorded from same. As I hope to publish early in 1901, the coming season will be the last during which information supplied can be incorporated in the work. Dublin. R. Li^ to take account of such factors in at- tempting to ascertain the cause of the anomalies such as the skeleton presents. It is also necessary to take note of the fact that the isolation of certain breeds means more than the separation of birds having certain colours or great local growths of feathers or grotesque wattles. The cultivation of a colourless or white breed of fowl may mean the perpetuation of an imperfectly' pigmented nervous system, and although pigment and lime do not appear to be necessary to each other, it would seem that phosphates and phosphoretted fats promote the efficiency of the nervous system. The increased growth of wattles or feathers is also associated with activities of another kind, which, if the skeleton do not experience a corresponding increase in vigour, may actually lead to a weakening of the bones. C. Darwin showed long ago how the skeleton varied in rabbits, &c., under domestica- 1900.] Anderson. — Sterna of Domestic Foivh. 151 tion, and Ray Laukester has pointed out how a tissue of high potential value may, in vanishing, afiford food for the manu- facture of more massive tissues less highly organized. Hence one must exercise much caution in coming to a conclusion with reference to the real origin of the deformities in fowls. The following breeds of fowl were kept separate for some years : — Minorcas, Leghorns, Plymouth Rocks, Brahmas, and Spanish Blacks. Two lyCghorns showed wry tails ; all the others were free from any marked deformity of this kind. Crooked-keeled sterna were, however, frequent. The most crooked keel of those preserved by me belonged to a Brahma. The keel where the bend is greatest is almost horizontal. There are marks of pressure in some cases. A broadening of the edge is perceptible in two keels bent to the right and in four bent to the left. An indentation occurs in front of the middle of two sternal keels bent to the left. Two keels have marks of beitig broken and reunited. The bend of the keel is to the left in nine cases out of fifteen, and in six keels to the right. The keels are sometimes crooked in water-fowl which do not roost. There is a note to the effect that a ''Black Norfolk Turkey" with a crooked breast was mated with a straight-breasted hen. The roosts were low and flat, the reporter goes on to say, five male birds out of sixteen had crooked breasts. The separate flocks referred to above were allowed to intermingle after some years, with the result that the crooked keels diminished in number. Guinea-fowls seem not to follow the lines of the ordinary domestic fowl. Those under observation at present have straight keels although they are the fifth generation from a common stock. It is possible that the original eggs were not laid by the same bird. The table herewith appended contains the answers of some of the best known English fancy-fowl breeders to a series of questions I sent round. The answers and foregoing records seem to show that (i) in-and-in breeding, (2) the nature of the roosts, (3) the nature of the season, (4) early hatching, (5) defective food and cold may all contribute to produce variations, and may rank among the predisposing, con- genital, exciting, and concomitant causes of the anomalies. 152 The Irish Naturalist. [June, Thjs Cause of Drformity of the Keei.s of the Sterna, AND OF Wry TAII.S in Fowxs. Replies of twelve English Breeders of Piirc-bred Fancy Fowls. No. of Reply. Question i — Are crooked keels due to roosting ? Question 2 — May crooked keels or wry tails be due to in-and-in breeding 'i Question 3 — Are such defects hereditary ? I 2 Yes, No, No. Yes, Crooked keels are. Wry tails not. May be, but crooked keeled birds have offsprings with straight breasts. Yes, if not acquired. If acquired, not transmissible. 3 Yes, Partly, 4 No, Yes, constitutional, Yes. 5 Yes, No, No. 6 Yes, Sometimes, May be. 7 Sometimes, Contributory, Sometimes. 8 Due to roosts, Contributory, Yes 9 Early roosting ma}' contribute. Cannot offer an opinion. Wry tails are. lO TI Due to roosts. Crooked keels not, but wry tails are . Yes. Due to perching too early. Wry tails due to perches placed too close to back wall. Yes, partly, No. 12 Early roosting, or round perches. No, . No. Queen's College, Galway. I900,] • 153 PROCEEDINGS OF IRISH SOCIETIES. Royal Zooi^ogicai. Society, Recent gifts include a Markhor, and a Urial from Lord Roberts, a number of Gold-fish from Mr.H.Pim, three Japanese Fowl from Mrs. C. B. Marla)^ a number of small birds from Master Despard, a Golden Pheasant from Mr. W. J. Williams, a Common Pheasant from Captain J. Carroll, a Black Rat from Dr. H. FitzGibbon, a pair of Pigeons from Mr, C. MacNaughten. Eleven hj'brid colts, between Horse and Zebra, were most kindly lent to the Gardens by Professor Kwart of Edinburgh. A Bactrian Camel has been born in the Gardens. A Genet, a Suricate, a Hairy Armadillo, two Californian Quails, six Parrakeets, and a Rock Mynali have been bought, 26,322 persons visited the Gardens during April, Bei^fast Natural, History and Philosophicai, Society. April, 3. — Under the chairmanship of Mr. Robert Young, C.E., Vice- President, a paper, entitled " Some of the Work done by Committees of the British Association," was read by Professor M. F. Fitzgeral,d, B.A., M.I.C.E. In the course of his lecture the Professor said the real and permanent value of the Association lay largely in the work not done at the conferences, but elsewhere during the intervals between. Since its inauguration the Association had granted about ;!f64,4oo for the furtherance of inquiries of great public importance, while the eminent scientists connected with it had freely granted their services. Every, where the practical men of the world had to turn to the theoretical men for their ideas and opinions. Through the efforts of the Association Committees research and experiments of extreme importance had been carried out in regard to electrical standards, steam navigation, steamship performances, strength of iron and steel, requirements of provincial museums, systems of teaching, inspection of elementary schools, chemical subjects of a wide range, and numerous other matters ; while at present a committee was engaged in testing w^hat dyes w^ere fast and what fugitive. The influence of the Association in national matters had not been by any means a negligible quantity, and had brought about many reforms. It was by neglect of the advice of the Association that many serious disasters occurred. The Association had placed before the Board of Trade the necessary data for the framing of regulations on various subjects at one-twentieth the cost which would otherwise have been involved. At the conclusion of the paper, on the proposition of Mr John Brown, seconded by Mr. C. M. Cunningham, a hearty vote of thanks was accorded Professor Fitzgerald. Subsequently, through the courtesy of Mr. E- A. MacGeorge, J. P., the members had an opportunity of inspecting a large bomb found recently at a depth of eight feet in estaurine clay convenient to the Scottish Provident Buildings, Wellington-place. 154 The Irish Naturalist, [June, BKI.FAST NaTURAUSTS' F1KI.D C1.UB. March 20. — The Vice-President (Mr. F. J. Bigger) in the chair. During the usual half-hour " gossip " Mr. IT. L. Orr exhibited the result of his examination of a portion of ordinary' wild land, measuring only 3 feet by 2 feet, from which he collected, on the i8th February, 38 beetles, comprising 21 species— i isopod crustacean, 6 icheumons of one species, a moth, a butterfly, 23 shells of seven species, 2 species of spider, and a mite. Mr. Hamilton exhibited some fine Lias fossils, and Mr. Gray some foliated cr3'stals of iron pyrites from Co. Down. At the formal meeting, held at eight o'clock, Miss S. M. Thompson contributed a paper on " The supposed occurrence of a patch of White Lias rock on the shore north of Macedon Point." This portion of the shore of Belfast Lough was formerly covered with sand and shingle, which were removed by spring storms, exposing the rock that attracted Miss Thompson's attention, who considered the rock belonged to the Rhaetic beds, and not to the Bunter division of the New Red Sandstone, as mapped by the Geological Survey. Miss Thompson consulted Professor Cole, and submitted specimens to Mr. M'Henry, of the Geological Survey. Both gentlemen admitted the resemblance of the rock to the beds at Waterloo, near Larne, and justified Miss Thompson's provisional identification. The next paper submitted was from Canon H. W. LETT, on the occurrence of Natterer's Bat and the Whiskered Bat in Co. Down. The former he captured at Aghaderg Glebe in June, 1897, and at the same place, in March, 1899, he secured a specimen of the Whiskered Bat, which, as in the case of Natterer's Bat, had not previously been recorded from the Co. Down. The paper furnished interesting details with reference to the character and distribution of all the known species of Irish bats. During the discussion that followed Mr. R. Patterson exhibited a specimen of the Whiskered Bat, captured by him at Dromore in July, 1899. Mr. Joseph Wright, F.G.S., delivered a lecture on " Post-Tertiarj' Formanifera." The results of his labours tend to modify hitherto accepted theories in reference to the origin of Boulder-clay, and the results obtained within the area of the Field Club's investigations have been confirmed by examples sent him for investigation by the Duke of Argyll, Dr. Dawson, of Canada; Mr. Neilson, Scotland; Miss Andrews, Wales ; Rev. Maxwell Close, Wicklow ; I. Smith, Ayrshire ; Colonel Feilden, Novaya Zemlya, and many 'other contributors and correspon- dents. The careful research necessary in the examination of these beautiful but minute organisms may be guessed when it is considered that a specimen of clay supplied by Mr. Gra)', from Bovevagli, Co. Derry, which weighed only 4nbs., yielded 57 species, of which there were 43,000 specimens, which were so small that 100,000 could be placed on a sixpence. Each communication was discussed, and after the election of members the meeting was closed by the Chairman reading an invitation from W. F. de V. Kane, D.L., to the Club to visit Co. Monaghan during the coming summer excursions. igoo.] Proceedings of Irish Societies. 155 Aprii. 6.— Compi^imenT to Mr. John Vinycomb, M.R.I.A.— Some of Mr. VinycomVs friends, having learned that there was a likelihood of his soon leaving Belfast for London, took the opportunity of presenting him and Mrs. Vinycomb with valuable expressions of their respect and sympathy. It was moved by Mr. Francis J. Bigger that the chair be taken by Mr. Adam Speers, B.Sc, who, in his opening remarks, said that he had had the privilege of long intimacy with Mr. Vinycomb. Mr. Vinycomb was not only an artist unequalled in those departments he had made his own, but he was a literary man as well — a rather rare combination— of which his valuable contributions to Kx Libris, Sphragistics, Archaeology, and Heraldry (in which he is recognised as one of the first authorities) gave ample proof His genius and worth were best known to those who held the highest places in the departments of art, literature, and science in which he had specialised. After the Chairnian's remarks, the meeting was addressed by Messrs John M. Dickson, Joseph Wright, J. J. Phillips, John Stevenson, S. Shannon Millen, B.L. ; and William Gray, all of whom spoke in terms of warmest admiration of Mr. Vinycomb's genius and of his life-work in Belfast. The Chairman then presented to Mr. Vinycomb a purse containing 100 guineas, and to MrSc Vinycomb two magnificent silver candelabra. Mr. Vinycomb^ replying on behalf of himself and his wife, said that he was quite unable to give adequate expression to what he felt. He was most grateful for all their kindness, and his earnest desire should ever be to merit their esteem. ApriIv 12. — Mr. J. M. Dickson in the chair. During the half-hour " gossip" the structural details of belemnites, ammonites, and nautilites were discussed, and illustrated by a series of instructive specimens collected by the members. At the formal meeting, Mr. W. Gray, M.R.I. A., submitted his report as delegate to the Dover meeting of the British Association, reported on the steps originated by the Field Club for inviting the British Association to revisit Belfast, and the favourable reception given to the deputation from Belfast by the general committee of the Association, indicating that the Association would probably come to Belfast in 1902. The Rev. M. Fahy delivered a lecture on '' Antiquarian and Natural History Notes of the Parish of Duneane and Baron}^ of Toome." The parish and church of Duneane, or Dunaeen (the fort of the two birds). are of ver}- ancient date, extending back to the sixth century, or earlier. Mr. Fahy, having fully described the topography and folklore of the parish, described the crannoges, souterrains, forts, holy wells, and other forms of antiquarian remains. Mr. Fahy spoke of the botany and natural history of the locality, naming the characteristic plants, birds, and fishes. From an economical point of view the Pollan, Salmon, andl^el are the most important fish captured at Toome. Of Eels as many as 67,200 have been taken in a night, and yet there is very much still to learn about the life history of the Pollan, Salmon, and Eel. At the conclusion a discussion took place, and some new members were elected, and the meeting terminated, 156 The h'ish Natnralist. [June, April iS.— Annuat, Me3':ting.— Francis J. Bigger, M.R.I.A., in the chair. Mr. William Gray (Hon. Secretary) read the report of the Com- mittee, which stated that there were now 322 members on the Societ3''s list, and that the practical interest taken in the work of the Club was fairly maintained. The following field meetings were held during the year: — Armagh, May 20th; Cargan and localit}', June loth ; Dundrum, June 24th; Dungiven and Limavady, July nth, 12th, and 13th; Toome, August 12th ; Ballynahiuch, September 2nd. All the excursions were well attended. A list was read of the papers brought forward at the winter meetings, of which reports have appeared in these pages. The report of the botanical section was satisfactory, their methods of operation affording exceptional opportunities for becoming acquainted with the flora of the North, under the presidency and guidance of the Rev. C. H. Waddell, whose devotion to the interests of the Club the Com- mittee gratefully acknowledged. The Cyperacese was the branch mainly studied. Of the prizes offered by the Club, Miss S. Blackwood secured one for a collection of Liassic fossils, including twenty-five species from the Lias of Islandmagee. Mr. Joseph Malcomson also received a prize for a collection of Irish plants, consisting of 284 species, well-selected examples, and beautifully mounted. The reports and statement of ac- counts were passed. The election of officers was proceeded with. Mr. F.J. Bigger, M.R.I.A., was elected President, and Mr. W. H. Phillips was elected as Vice-President. Mr. Phillips was also re-electedTreasurer, and Mr. William Gray, M.R.I.A., and W. D. Donnan, M.D. Hon. Secretaries, with the following members of Committee : — George Donaldson, W. J. Fennell, M.R.I.A.I. ; J. St. J. Phillips, A.R.I.B.A. ; John Hamilton, Alexander Milligan, H. L. Orr, S. A. Stewart, F.B.S.E. ; John Vinycomb, M.R.I.A. ; Robert Welch, and Joseph Wright, F.G.S. With reference to the coming year's w^ork, it was suggested that a committee be appointed to investigate the fauna of Lough Neagli, and, in anticipation of the visit of the British Association, that a revised edition of the Club's guide should be prepared. Dubinin Naturai^ists' Fiei^d Ci.ub. Al'RiIv 10. — The last business meeting of the winter session was held, Mr. Greenwood Pim, President, in the chair. The minutes of the previous meeting were read and signed. The Rev. W. E1.1.1SON read a paper on " A New Use for an Astronomical Telescope," which will appear in cxtcuso in a succeeding number of the Irish Naturalist. The President, Mr. Palmer, and Dr. Alcock spoke on the paper. Dr. Alcock (Hon. Sec.) read several " Natural History Notes " for Mr. J. G. Robertson, who, through illness, was unable to be present at the meeting. One of Mr. Robertson's notes on the occurrence of the Kingfisher at Ranelagh will be found on page 159 of this number. The other notes dealt with the growth of the old Acacia trees in the Sandford district, as testifying to the age of the settlement of the neighbourhood. One tree growing in the garden connected with the rectory of Sandford iQoo.] Proceedhigs of Irish Societies. 157 is probably the oldest and largest specimen of the species to to be found in Ireland, being about sixty feet high. It originally possessed five great limbs springing from a trunk, which contrary to the usual habit of growth of the Acacia is is only about three feet high. This tree has lost two of its great limbs ; one of them measured in section 21 inches by 16 inches ; the three remaining limbs appear to be equal to this size. The circumference of the trunk at a foot above the ground is about thirteen feet. The great limbs are bare of branches until they reach a height of thirty feet or so. But what is most remark- able in connexion with this tree, is, that a common Holly about ten feet high, with a stem of two inches in diameter and branches thin, greatest spread about six feet, foliage of a fine healthy growth, is growing upon it. In the concave surface of the top of the trunk, encircled as it is by the limbs, in course of time a deposit of decayed vegetable matter, added to by dust and soot during along series of years, formed a sufficient bed for the vegetation and support for a time of a holly-berry dropped by some passing bird. But how has a Holly-bush, resting on such shallow soil, withstood the drought of many seasons } No doubt its roots made their way into the trunk, and have now worked through it into the ground. The Rev. W. Ellison, Messrs. Peth3^bridge and Smyth were duly elected members, and Mrs, Ellison and Mr. G. W. Nicholson nominated as can- didates for election at the next meeting. May 12,— The first excursion of the summer season took place, A party of thirty left Amiens-street by the 1.50 p.m. train for Malahide. The Rev. W. Ellison acted as conductor. The members walked along the Portmarnock road in the direction of the strand, until the fossiliferoiis limestone rocks were reached. Here Dr. Foord demonstrated to the party the presence of many forms of fossils (brachiopods, trilobites, crinoids, &c,), and collectors secured some interesting specimens. After a most enjoyable afternoon the party proceeded back to the Malahide Hotel, where tea was provided at 5 o'clock. Cork Naturai,ists' EiEi.t) Ci.ub. May 5, — The first excursion of the season was made to Waterfall and Ballincollig. The party explored the glen, and bog between the two places, with the following results: — Ranitucuhis kcderaceus was very abundant, and Chrysospknium oppositifolinm was in some places a veritable covering for large pieces of rock. The fertile stems of the Equisetiim arvense were very much in evidence. Two thick clumps of Saxifraga tridactylites were found on an old wall. Many of the hedges were composed almost entirely of Vaccinitun myrtillus. A great scarcity of mosses was noticed in this district. 158 The Irish Naturalist. [June, NOTES BOTANY. Cladlum Jamalccnsc and Carex riparia In Co. Down. A winter's da}^ ten years ago, I spent in going over the then partially constructed line from Downpatrick to Killough, by invitation of my friend, Leonard Bell, C.E., Resident Engineer. At the point where the foundations of the bridge over the Killough-road were pegged out, the leaves of a large sedge were noticed, which I could not identify at the time ; and driving back to Downpatrick in the twilight, another unfamiliar cyperaceous plant was seen forming a dense grove in the centre of a marsh by the roadside, three miles from Killough. "When cycling last Easter I revisited these spots. The plant at the former place I now recognized as Carex riparia^ and I observed it growing abundantly in ditches by the railway around Killough distant signal. The second plant was also duly refound, and turns out to be Cladinnijamaicense. Both of these species are to be reckoned among the rare plants of Co. Down. Cladium had not been seen in the county for a century till Mr. Stewart and I rediscovered its only station near Castlewellan, and I subsequently found it near Strangford {I.N. vi., 219). C. riparia had four previous records :—Gillhal! (Corry); Lough Neagh, 1838 (Hyndman); near Belfast, 1806 [extinct] ; and Lough Neagh, 1810 [close to Hyndmau's Station], Templeton. R. L1.OYD PraegER. Dublin, ZOOLOGY. CRUSTACEA. Trichonlscus vividus at Cappag^h. When on a visit to Mr. Ussher's beautiful demesne at Cappagh, Co. Waterford, last summer I met with Trichoniscus vividus in large numbers. This rare woodlouse occurred under fallen leaves and sticks close to the shores of an artificial lake. It was first recorded from Portlaw, Co. Waterford, by the late Prof. Kinahan. I subsequently' took it at Borris, Co. Carlow {Irish Nat. vol. iv., p. 319) so that Cappagh is the third locality in Ireland. It has never been found in Great Britain, and on the Continent it only occurs in the Pyrenees. R. F. SCHARFF. ' Science and Art Museum, Dublin. 1900.] Notes, 159 INSECTS. Lepldoptera of Coi Cork, A valuable list of Lepidoptera, taken for the most part uear Tiinoleague, by Mr. R. J. F. Donovan, appears in the current number of the Entomologist (vol. xxxiii., pp. 143-7), The rare noctuid Laphygtua exi^ua is added to the Irish list, while Leucania imipunda {extraned) and Sterrha, sacraria are recorded from this country for the second time ojily, MOLLUSCS, Irish Land and Freshwater Mollusca. In the /ournal of Conchology, vol. ix., 1900 (pp. 299-301), Mr. L. B. Adams in his presidential address to the Conchological vSociety has some interesting notes on Limncta involuta, Geomalacus inaadosiis, and Irish slugs generally. Commenting on the great variability of Irish slugs, he remarks that the distribution of varietal forms in the British Isles *'is exactly what we should expect if we accept the theory of a Lusitanian origin for our slugs which has been so ably set forth by Dr. R. F. Scharff in his European FannaP BIRDS, Springy lYIlgrrants In Co. Wexford. It may interest readers of the Irish Natiiralist to know that on April 19th the Cuckoo came into this neighbourhood. On the 6th April a Golden Oriole came to my lawn, remaining till next day. On May 8th the Orange-tip Butterfly was in full flight. Thos. B. Gibson. Ferns. A Kingfisher at Ranelaerh. About three months ago, whilst taking a walk in the grounds attached to the residence (Sandford) of Mr. J. Pile, I was surprised at starting a Kingfisher. It appeared to have been looking after some of the small fish which have been put into an artificial pond formed within the last four years. As the Kingfisher is a rare and shy bird, this appears to have been a daring little fellow to come down from a mountain stream in search of food within a few yards of the back of a terrace, which may be said to form a continuation of city streets. J. G. Robertson, Dublin. i6o The Irish Naturalist. [June, Hoopoe In Co. Antrim. A fine male Hoopoe ( Upupa epops) was shot on April 23rd at Glendun, Co. Autrim, by Sir vSamuel Black's gamekeeper. It had probably only just arrived, as its stomach was quite empty. It was in excellent plumage. Robert Patterson. Belfast. Call of the Spotted Crake. On the loth of May, 1900, having been informed by my butler that an unknown bird had been calling for several nights, I follow^ed the sound for about half a mile until w^e located it in a swampy spot that was impassable. It was then about 10 p. m. The note w^as incessantly repeated, like " whuit, whuit, whuit," uttered in a loud, clear tone that reached far and wide in the stillness of the night, and was not interrupted b}' m}' approaching within thirty or forty yards. Since the loth inst. it has only been heard once, so that the bird may have passed aw^ay ; but it should be remembered that the Spotted Crake has bred in Co. Roscommon, where Col. Irwin found the eggs he has presented to the Dublin Museum. As this bird is a summer visitor to England, it should be watched for in sw'ampy places in Ireland now, and as its call-note is so clear and far- reaching there should be no difficulty in recognizing it. The descriptions of this sound given by Mr. Howard Saunders and Mr. Dresser left no doubt on my mind that my conjectures as to what the species was were correct, though I could not see it. Richard J. Ussher. Cappagh. Egyptian Goose In Co. Derry. A very perfect specimen of the Egyptian Goose was recently shot near Toomebridge by a farmer who found it feeding among his own geese. Where it came from is not known. It is now stuffed, and in the possession of Mr. Frank Grant, Toomebridge. It measures 21 inches in length, iS in height, with a length of leg about 6 inches. This bird is hardly ever found in these climates except in ornamental waters. Many unusual visitors, such as the Stormy Petrel, have also been found iu this neighbourhood, round I,ough Beg. M. Fahy. Duueane Rectory, Toome. [No authenticated wild specimen of the Egyptian Goose has occurred in these islands, and there can be little doubt that the bird recorded by Mr. I'ahy had escaped from confinement. — Eds.] 1900.] Notes, i6i Notes on the Influence of Man and Civilisation on certain Birds. We often read statements in print to the effect that man and his civi- lisation are frequently driving away birds or other living creatures from their haunts, not because such haunts are thus made unsuitable, but because the too close proximity of man is objectionable, I suspect that such cases are frequently exaggerated, and that, in the case of birds, it is often rather the capture of the adults, the robbing of their nests, and the general destruction of suitable and attractive breeding places, than any indirect influence which is at work. At all events it is pleasant to record instances where birds have become quite accustomed to the inroads of civilisation. While travelling from Dublin to New Ross, through the beautiful country traversed by the Dublin, Wicklow, and Wexford Railway Company's line, I have more than once noticed Wild Ducks sitting quij:e at their ease on some pool quite close to which the train passed at full speed. F.ven the wary Heron too has come to regard the works of man with such familiarity, that he sees no need to interrupt his fishing when a train appears. I must confess, however, that I was a little surprised to catch a glimpse of the reddish breast and blue back of (what I had previously regarded as quite a shy bird) a Kingfisher as the train rushed past the dyke by the Slaney over which it sat, We passed within about twenty yards of the bird, but it remained seated, as far as I could see, quite motionless on a branch overhanging the water. The large black and white Kingfisher, Ceiyle rudis (Linn. ), is, apparently, not so sensible. This bird is a common and conspicuous species in lower Egypt, its haunts being the banks of the Nile, and of the numerous canals and dykes which intersect the cultivated country. An interesting thing happened to me in connection with one of these birds on one occasion as I was travelling by rail from Ismailia to Cairo. A dyke ran alongside the line for some distance, and by this, at a place where no intersecting branch met it, sat a Kingfisher. On the approach of the train the bird took flight and attempted to fly away, keeping its course, however, along the d3-ke. Its speed, however, was not as great as that of the train, which slowly, but surely, overtook it. The chase lasted for some little distance. At length we came right up to the bird, which all the time had not the sense to attempt to escape by leaving the dyke. It was forced to turn and fly back, and I could plainly see its open bill as, utterly fatiguedj it gasped for breath and shrieked with terror just as the carriage in which I was passed it. The observation is also, I think, of interest as giving a slight idea of the pace attainable by this bird when on the wing and at its best speed. It evidently cannot fly at a rate of thirty miles an liovir, at least for more than a very short distance. G. E. H. Barre;tt-Hamii,ton. Kilmanock, Co. Wexford. 1 62 The Irish Natufalist, [June, 1900. MAMMALS, Martens In North of Irelandii A female Marten (J/a;7'c.T.'.j/z'a//Va) was trapped at Bryausford, Co. Down, on 15th February, 1899. It was in rather poor condition. But the finest Marten I have yet seen was trapped at Castle Dobbs, near Carrickfergus, Co. Antrim, on 8th July, 1899. It was a male, weighed 4 lbs., and the colour of the fur is almost black. Thompson records Martens from both of the above localities, Robert Patterson. Belfast. Whiskered Bat In Co^ Down. On July 28th, 1898, I received a Whiskered Bat (VesJ>erh'h'o 7nystacimis) from Dromore, Co. Down, being the first record for the county. In 1899 another one was obtained by Canon Lett, as mentioned in a paper read by him at a meeting of the Belfast Naturalists' Field Club on 20th March, 1900. Robert Patterson. Belfast. Hairy-armed Bat In Co. Wexford. I am pleased to be able to corroborate my friend, Mr. Barrett-Hamilton's belief, that the Hairy-armed Bat occurs in Co. Wexford. lyast summer I repeatedly observed it at Ballyhyland, where a group of bats of this species are in the habit of frequenting a certain pasture-field (called the "lower cow-pasture") every evening throughout a great part of the summer. Having become familiar with the aspect of Vesperugo Leisleri on the wing in Co. Wicklow — where Dr. Alcock kindly conducted me to some of its favourite haunts — I was able to recognise it here with con- fidence, though of course I am still desirous of finding its sleeping-place and obtaining a specimen. In previous summers the shrill and frequent cries of this bat had often attracted the attention of myself and others when passing the gate of the lower cow-pasture, showing that the spot has long been a customary haunt ; but until 1899 I had noidea from what species the screams proceeded. Cow-pastures seem, both here and in Co. Wicklow, to be favourite resorts of the Hairy-armed Bat, though not visited till somewhat late in the evening. C. B. Moffat, Ballyhyland, Co. Wexford. Irish Naturalist, Vol. IX. Plate 5. Abnormal Shells of Helix nemoralis, from Bundoran. 7iat. size ¥ ,a««. >.**«ii5«e^JimKr- av^. Egg-cluster of the Kerry Slug, Geomalacus maculosus, Allman, x 2. To face page 163. uly, 1900.] 163 ABNORMALITIES IN THE SHEIvL OF HELIX NEMORALIS. BY R. WELCH. [Read before the Belfast Naturalists' Field Club, December, 1S99.] (Platk 5-) Of the comparatively few and much prized specimens of reversed Helices that are to be found in public museums, or in the cabinets of private collectors in the British Islands, probably the majority are of Helix neuioralis, and of these the greater number, if localised at all, will be found labelled " Bundoran, South Donegal." Visitors to that well-known health resort find old peasant-women selling, for a few pence, long necklaces made of the dextral forms of either H. acuta, H. cf icetoncj/i or H. nemoralis ; the last, being more plentiful and more ornamental than the others, is the species generally used. These land-shells are collected on the great sand-dunes that stretch from the cliffs at the Fairy Bridges, Bundoran, almost to Ballyshannon, and along the Erne River to its mouth. So far, the old women only use the empty shells that may be found in thousands in the dune hollows, and the stock there seems sufficient to supply the local demand for long years to come, without touching the living ones. With theseoccurafew beautiful scalariform shells (Figs. 12-19) which are doubtless recognised in the collecting, and suitably cared for ; the less rare sinistral (Figs. 1-8) and malformed specimens being likely noted and laid aside as the mass of shells are pierced for use. Although abnormal shells like these are occasionally recorded in the scientific journals from other places, the total finds of reversed and scalariform specimens of this species from the whole Kingdom during this century, are probably far below those found at Bundoran alone in the last twenty years. During this period about 900 of the former have been received by members of the Belfast Naturalists' Field Club, mainly by Messrs. Gray and Svvanston, who have passed most of them on to collections in various parts of the United Kingdom, a smaller number having also been obtained by visitors to the district from the old women themselves. For a A 164 The Irish Naturalist. [July, number of years past about 60 to 100 per annum seem to have been found, with one or two "spiders" as I have heard the scalariform shells called at Bundoran. In addition, some rather interesting " repairs " occur (Fig. 8), also specimens having a considerable rough extension to the otherwise complete lip (Figs. 10 and 11), and an occasional reversed form wdth a tendency to the scalariform shape (Fig. 7). The majority of the latter are however lower in the spire than the common dextral form. Some of the last are very high in the spire, wdth deep suture, and I have seen ten specimens distinctl}^ scalariform ; a few of these are in the Dublin Museum. One or tw^o were fairly fresh young specimens. These are, I take it, merely monstrosities wiiich occur oftener here than elsewhere. Of the reversals, on the contrary, were they a distinct race now extinct rather than mere "sports"? Their numbers seem to favour the former idea, and I have never seen a really fresh specimen, or one with epidermis on. A few^ show the banding as clearly as frCvSh shells, but this (as witness the well-known Dog's Bay finds) may be the case even though they have been buried in dunes for ages. The}^ are of fair size, and, on the whole, wxigli more, when not sand-eroded, than the typical living specimens. On one of my visits to Bundoran, while hunting for " shell pockets " I found living on a small area of the dunes a thick heavy form of var. hyalozonata (Fig. 9) with the white lip w^hich accompanies that variety. The pale yellow epidermis is very thin and hardly a trace of it remains by the time the shell is completed. This, wherever else I have collected it, has always been a much lighter shell than the type of the locality where it occurred, and this is also the experience of friends who have given special attention to this species ; by type of course I mean the ordinary banded and unhanded forms with dark lip. At Bundoran, on the contrary, many of the shells of hyalozonata, though smaller than the type there, are thicker and heavier, so much so, that three or four of the heaviest weigh almost as much in proportion to their size as the average heavy sub-fossil specimens from Dog's Ba}-, Co. Galwa}^ Four specimens w^eighed respectively 50, 42, 30, and 27 grains, average 37, a high average even when compared with the heaviest typical shells, igoo- 1 WkIvCH . — A bnormal Shells of Helix nemoralis. 1 65 These were evidently some of the " oldest inhabitants," as the epidermis was quite gone. Of the fourteen in all collected alive, eight weighed over 20 grains, and the others, younger shells of the first or second year with lip barely completed, 10 grains or over. The only other place where I got this variety over 10 grains in weight was at Islandmagee, Antrim coast ; one of three there weighed 15 grains. But my friend, Mr. Edw^ard Collier, of Manchester, obtained one at Folkestone of 17 grains, and another at Bally vaughan, Co. Clare, of the same weight, with two much lighter ones. Three specimens in his collection from Peel, Isle of Man, weigh under 6 grains each, and four others from various localities average 8 grains. The typical shells at Bundoran are rather strong and heavy (as will be seen from the weights of others, from coast localities also, that I give for comparison), but though I examined hundreds, I could find none over 34 grains, and only one of that, the average of the four best being 28 grains, of the ten best 25 grains, much under the weights of the variety respectively. The discrepancy is still greater in the following, which were also selected from the heaviest specimens I could get in each case. Of course, though all were alive when collected, the shells were well cleaned and dried before weighing. WEIGHTS IN GRAINS. Grains. Portrush dunes. (Out of alarge number, two weighed 17 each.) Average of nine best, . . . = n Whitepark Bay, Co. Antrim. Average of ten, . = 9J Portstewart dunes, Co. Derry. (One 17.) Average of 10, . . . . . . . = 10 St. John's Point, Co. Down. (None over 13.) Average of 12, . . . . . = 10 Newcastle, Co. Down. (Shells are thin on dunes here, especially at southern end, and the lightest I have collected anywhere.) Average of ten, • = 4 These were the ordinary banded and unhanded forms (mostly libelliUa), and they were all collected at places w^here there seemed to be an abundant food-supply —the main factor, one might expect, in the formation of a heavy shell. In the case of the Bundoran specimens, on the contrary, all of the heavy A 2 1 66 The Lisli Naturalist. [July, variety were found on a ver}' bare sandy patch in the most ex- posed part of the dunes close to Finner Strand, where only a few plants grow sparingly among the Bent {Psamma are7iana). Here they are very liable to be covered up several inches or even several feet deep bj^ the shifting sands blowing in from the beach with the prevailing wind. Though many of the type are to be found here also, the latter are in greatest abundance in the inland hollows of the dunes near the River Erne, which are well turfed over, with plenty of food-plants. I could understand the Bundoran shells, as a whole, being heavier than those from inland or north-eastern coast localities, if a moist climate and freedom from severe frost are among the favourable conditions necessar}^ for long life, and consequent possession of a thicker shell. But why the var. liyalozonata, usually a much thinner shell, should here become heavier than the typical Helix 7temoralis I cannot understand, and mention the fact in the hope that it maybe of interest to those conchologists who are engaged in working out life-histories of the land mollusca. It is certain that a moist, mild climate does not alwa^'s lead to a thick shell, unless other conditions favourable to its formation are also present. It does seem to influence the size as a rule, and on Valencia Island, S.W. Kerry, the mildest corner of the British Islands, this species is large, though thin and light. I judge by a large number which have at different times been collected there by Miss Delap. She states that they do not hibernate in winter, but only retire for short periods in dry or cold weather to the roots of plants. Thirty- five of these large shells weigh on an average onl}^ 9*25 grains, the heaviest being only 1 1 grains, yet they feed prac- tically all the 3^ear round, and the food supply is plentiful. On the Great Isle of Aran, Co. Galway, this species grows to a larger size than elsewhere in Britain ; for their size (many 26 by 19 mm., average 25 b}" 19 mm.) they are not heavy, nine specimens collected by Mr. R. LI- Praeger, now in the Dublin Museum, averaging only 13 grains. The climate is like Valencia, moist and mild, and the molluscs live in the deep crevices of the limestone terraces, where there is good shelter and food is plentiful. These shells prove that an abundance of calcareous matter present does not necessarily 1900.] Wei. which were slighth^ adhering to each other by mucus. These were removed into another jar, and kept separate from the parent slug. On 20th August eight more eggs were deposited, and placed in a separate jar, as I was anxious to raise a few adults. The eggs which were laid at the end of July were examined on October 12th, and I found that seven slugs were then grown to about half to three-quarters of an inch long ; one Qgg had collapsed ; what became of the others I cannot tell. The eggs deposited on August 20th had not been hatched when I looked at them on October 12th, but by the end of the month the}' were all hatched, except one, which appeared to be dead. These young slugs increased in size until the beginning of February, 1878 (having been fed with carrot) ; two of them were then found dead, and very much attenuated. The odontophores of these were found to have the same characters as those of adults. Of the slugs hatched from the eggs deposited at the end of July previousl}', I found one dead on the 20th of Februarj^, 1878. Thinking that they died for want of animal food, I cut an earthworm in three pieces, and placed it in the jar with four or five Zonites nitidulus. On clearing out the jar on March 17th, 1878, I found that the j'oung slugs had begun to diminish in size and number, only two moderately healthy ones remaining, and another much reduced in size, with its head eaten off and the internal shell exposed ; of the others I could not find a trace. The earthworm had not been eaten, the head and tail divisions of the worm were still alive, but the centre part was dead. 1 also found that one of the Zonites had a hole through its shell, and the latter was empl}'. On the 17th March I examined the jar in which were placed the first batch of eggs which I had separated from the parent, and found all the young slugs dead, except two. The discovery of four internal shells of the others leads me to put down their disappearance to cannibalism. On July 19th, 1878, the parent slug was found dead, but from what cause I could not determine. It might have been through old age, want of proper food, or excessive heat of the month (the latter most probably). The young slugs seemed lyo The hish NahwaUst. [Ju^y> to die when they attained the length of about half or three- quarters of an inch. I did not know their proper food, and perhaps I ought to have attended oftener to the cleaning out of the jars with fresh water. Mr. R. Welch informs me that, while in the Kenmare district in Ma3% 1898, assisting in the arrangements for the Field Club Union Conference held there two months later, he collected a large number of Gcomalacus, some of which he fed well on lichens and lettuce, to show at the winter meetings in Belfast and Dublin, On Jul}' 22nd one of the slugs laid eighteen eggs in a cluster, parti}' eating three before he had time to remove them, and on the 25th three more were laid. These were loose, not attached. About a week later the eggs had turned quite brown, and had shrivelled up to half their size, .so he placed them in weak alcohol for preservation. During an Kaster visit to the same district last 3'ear, Mr. Arthur W. Stelfox kindly collected for him some more specimens near the tunnel on the Glengarriff road. These were larger and much darker in colour than those previousl}* obtained in more sheltered positions at about 900 feet less altitude. On July 20th the largest specimen (40 mm. long when at rest, 17 mm. wide, 15 mm. high) laid twent\'-seven eggs, twenty-four in a cluster and three free; the cluster measured 31 by 16 by 14 mm, ; the eggs were fairly uniform in size, the largest 8 J by 4:^ mm., the smallest 6 by 4 mm. The}^ varied slighth' also in shape, some being almost ovoid, but the majority distinctly tapered at one end, not unlike the shape of a Guillemot's egg. No attempt was made to hatch these ; they were promptly distributed to friends who had never seen them. These GeoviaIac2(s egg-clusters are very beautiful objects, as the photograph (Plate 5) of the last lot Mr. Welch obtained will partly show. They are translucent, with a pearly opalescence which it is impossible to render properly in monochrome, if, indeed, at all. The Irish specimens are certainly not transparent like those reported from Portugal by Simroth {loc. cit.) ; trans- lucent, with a small transparent area at the narrower end in some cases, would better describe them. Manchester. i9oo] 171 SOME MOSSES FROM NORTH-EAST IRELAND. BY J. H. DAVIKS. In the case of muscological botany it seems unsafe to say of any large district that it has been so thoroughly explored that nothing remains to reward the patient investigator. Many of the mosses are so minute, and their distinguishing marks such that they cannot well be recognized without micro- scopical examination, they are liable to be overlooked or mistaken. Even in areas that have been best searched by the keenest-eyed and most experienced observers one need not dCvSpair of meeting with something which has been previously unnoticed. From time to time in the course of the last few months, as my scant opportunities permitted^ I have found pleasure in renewing and extending an old acquaintance with these attractive plants, and have met with several species of some rarity and with others that I had never before gathered. A few brief extracts from my notes on some of those that have come under observation, chiefly within a radius of about four miles from Lisburn, and a few noticed between Kilroot and Whitehead, on the County Antrim coast of Belfast Lough, may not be unwelcome to those interested in our Irish moss-flora. In addition to some of them being new to the north-eastern district, the short list now supplied includes the names of three species and two varieties which were not before known as Irish plants. These are Torhila inarginata, Amblystegium Jiiratzkamtm, and A. variuvi ; the var. acutifolia oi Barbula tophacea, and the var. subglobosa of Weisia viridula. The latter variety it would seem has not before been noted as British. It will have been noticed that for several of the more minute Fissidenics, which have a wide distribution in Britain, the Irish stations so far recorded are singularly few. In the absence of fructification the}^ are difficult to determine, and even when in fruit may have been passed over without being discriminated from the nearly allied and everywhere common Fissideyis bryoides. But the bryological productions of many parts of our island have been too much neglected. In Dr. Moore's " Synopsis of tbe Mosses of Ireland" -(1872) only A3 172 The Irish Naturalist. [July, eighteen counties are mentioned. Irish bryologists are unhappily few in number, and the places of those best known, who in recent years have gone ad phcrcs, have not been filled. Such researches as I have been able to make during the past winter (the season in which most of the species of the genus Fissidais are in perfection) have been rewarded by the detection in the neighbourhood of Lisburn of three scarce species, F. cxilis, F, incurviis and F. viridnlus. Specimens of each have been examined by Mr. H. N. Dixon, M.A., F.L-S., for whose kindness therein, and in various other wa3'S I wish here to express my most sincere thanks. F. pusilhcs, a species which Mr. Stewart discovered in Co. Antrim some years ago (and which is not known elsewhere in Ireland), and /'. taniarin- difolius, which I have had in view, have so far eluded me, but these I hope may yet be found. Polytrichum g^racile, Dicks.— Damp peaty places ou White Mouii- taiu, Co. Antrim. Moore states that it is common in Ireland. It is not found to be so in the North, but, as he says, it may sometimes be passed over as a weak state of P. coinmtme, to which it has a general resemblance. Dlcranella crlspa, Schp. — With Polytrichum nanum var. longisctiim.on a sandy bank by the Ravarnette river, near lyisburn, Co. Down, where it was abundant and in good fruit in November. It is one of the rare species, first recognized as Irish near Belfast by Templeton in the beginning of the present century. Dlcranella SQuarrosa, Schp. — In wet places on White Mountain, Co. Antrim. DIcranoweisia cirrata, Lindb.— On Hornbeam and other trees in several places about L,isburn, Co. Antrim. Seems to be rare in Ireland (though frequent in England), and cannot now be found in Templeton's original locality, which was the only other station for this moss in Co. Antrim. Flssldens exills, Iledw. — On a clay bank, by the roadside, near the quarry, at the foot of White Mountain, Co. Antrim. One of our rarest Irish mosses, hitherto known only in two places, both near Belfast, the last notice of it being by Mr. Stewart (iSSo). A very minute and beautiful species, which mij;ht be overlooked for a small form o{ P. l»yo ides, but, even without close examination, the short bright red seta and large acutely-conical lid, which is about as long as the capsule, will be found to be good distinguishing characters.^ 1 Since writing this I am informed that P. exilis has recently been met with by Mr. S, A. Moore, also in Co. Antrim. 1900.] DavieS. — Some Mosses from North-East Ireland. 173 Fissldens virldulus, Wahl.— On moist sandy banks, by the side of the road over Tullyard, and at Lisnatrunk, Co. Down, also in similar situations at Ballymacash and Derriaghy, Co. Antrim, and in other places near Lisburn. Dr. Moore knew of only one Irish locality (Howth), and it cannot be found that there is any later record. From the frequency of its occurrence about Lisburn it may be assumed that it will be met with elsewhere. A smaller plant, with a shorter fruit stalk than F. bryoides. As Mr. Dixon points out to me, the male inflorescence is very small at the base of the stem, whereas in F. bryoides it is pretty conspicuous in the axils of the upper leaves. Fissidens Incurvus, Starke.— Cla}- banks by the wayside at the southern slope of White mountain, and in a like situation by the sea-side at Kilroot, Co. Antrim. There is no mention of this in the "Synopsis," and it was unknown to Mr. Stewart when making his catalogue of mosses for " Flora of the North-east of Ireland.'' The moss, I make out, was first recognized in Ireland by Canon Lett, who has sent me specimens which he gathered at Derryadd, Co. Armagh, in 1S85. Mention of his discovery, he informs me, was made in a paper soon afterwards read by him before the Belfast Naturalists' Field Club, but not published in their Proceedings. The same bryologist also met with it later in Co. Louth (^Proc. R.I. A., 1890). We have thus four Irish stations for the moss, two of which are in the Norih-east. In its typical fruiting state it is easily separated from the allied species. The seta is longer than in the preceding plant, and the capsule ceruuous, not erect as in that. In his most serviceable "Handbook," Mr. Dixon says: "When in fruit, and closely tufted, the plant bears a superficial resemblance to Dicranella varia,'' a remark which, if taken as having reference mainly to the fruit, is very good. The plant occurring at Kilroot is a very small ' and most interesting form, one which Mr. Dixon, to whom I sent speciiriens, says he had not before seen, but both leaves and fruit having all the characters oi F. incujvus, it must, he states, be referred to that vSpecies. Pott la Heimii, Flirnr. — Abundant along the sea-coast from Kilroot to Whitehead, Co. Antrim. A maritime species, which Moore gives as rare in the North, I suspect it is not uncommon. It would seem that he missed seeing it in Co. Derry, but Mr. Lett has collected it at Portstewart in that county, and Mr. Dixon records it from the Giant's Causeway.'' Tortula marginata, Spr.— On the face of red sandstone rocks near Derriaghy — Milltown, on the left-hand side of the road from Lisburn to that village, May, 1900. An addition to the Irish moss-flora. In the locality named it occurs in profusion, growing not in tufts or cushions, but in wide-spreading patches. The thickened leaf-margin is best seen under the microscope, but the form of leaf with nerve excurrent in a greenish mucro is distinctive, and by the delicately ^ fourn, Bot. xxix., p. 362. 174 The huh Naturalist. [July? slender vSeta of pale amber colour tinj^ed with red it ma}- readil}- be separated from other species of the section to which it belongs. Derriaghj' was one of Templeton's favourite localities, and the exposed sandstone by the w-ayside there has been often searched both by Mr. Stewart and myself. It seem? singular, therefore, that the plant was not previously recognised. The stem is very short, and in the absence of fruit the plant would be almost certain to escape notice. Barbula tophacea, Mitt., van acutifolla, Schp.— With IVebera carnea on a steep clay bank b}' the Lagan canal at the first locks above Lisburn, Co. Antrim. The t3'pe is rather common, but the variet}', I think, has not before been noticed in Ireland. Welsla microstoma, CM.— In old gravel-pits about Ivisburn, both in Down and Antrim, where it is usually associated with Phasatm sulmlatuvt. lyiable to be mistaken for Weisz'a viridula, which it nearly resembles, and is likely not uncommon. Welsla viridula, Hedw., var. subg-Iolisosa, Schp.— Bank by the Lagan, about a quarter of a mile below Lisburn, Co, Dowm. In fruit, May, 1900. The form of fructification differs widely from that of normal W. viridit/a, the capsule (on a shorter seta) being sub-globose with a much shorter lid. "Your IVeisia seems to agree very well with the var. subglobosa, Schp. as described by Lirapricht. The peristome teeth are red instead of pale, but I do not think this would stand in the way of the identification. It is curious that the spores seem larger in some of the varieties than in the type. This is the case with the above variety (in which your plant agrees), and with the var. densifolia. I do not think it has been recorded in Britain before." Dixon in lit., 23 May, 1900. Encalypta vulg-aris, Hedw\--On limestone by the sea at Whitehead, Co. Antrim. Seems to be rare in Ireland In the north there are three other stations, in none of which has it recently been seen, so I am informed by Mr. Stewart. Funaria fascicularls, Schp.— Sandy stubble fields at Blaris, Co. Down. In no place did I notice more than a few stems together. A rare species, which Moore has recorded from only two counties. Wetoera annotlna, Schwgr. — On crumbling red sandstone in the glen near Derriaghy, Co, Antrim. With immature fruit in June, 1900. Five stations have been placed on record for this plant in Ulster, where it seems to be confined to Down and Antrim, and in two of them (Templeton's) it has not recently been seen. Klsewhere in Ireland it would also appear to be very scarce. The time for fruiting, according to Mr Dixon, is summer, but it is a dioicous species and very rarely fertile. Early in June the fructification of my plant was vStill unripe. Templeton states that he obtained it in fruit in March, 1806, and again in April, 1809, which notwithstanding his characteristic care and accurac}', causes some suspicion that a mistake may have been made. Mr. Dixon informs me that most of the alpine plants 1900.] Daviks. — Soi}?c Mosses from North-East Ireland. 1 75 distributed as W. amiotiua with fruit seem to he IV. comimiiata. I have not seen examples of the plant recorded from the Mourne Mountains by Canon Lett. It might be well to re-examine the specimens gathered on Slieve Donard, on the chance of their proving to belong to IV. covmnitata., a rare moss not known to occur in Ireland. Bryum murale, Wils. — Wall at " The Plantation," Lisburn, Co. Down, and bridge over Lagan at Lambeg, Co. Antrim. Apparently rare wnth us, but more likely that sufficient care may not have been used to separate it from nearh' related species. Brachythccium salebrosum, B. and S.— Boggy ground in a field on the left hand side of road from Lambeg village to Derriaghy, Co. Antrim. An addition to the North-eastern list. In his ■' Synopsis," under B. Mildeamim, of which Hypnuiii salebrosum is cited as a synonym, Moore gives only three stations for the species, and notes it as " very rare in Ireland." Eurhynchium, praelongum, B. and vS., var. Stokesii, Brid. — Foot of Beech trees in the wood at Ballymacash, Co. Antrim. Not before recorded for the North, and appears to be uncommon in other parts of Ireland. Interesting as having been first described and figured as a separate species by Dawson Turner in " Muscologise HiberuicEe " (1804) from specimens gathered hy Dr. Stokes at Lough Bray. Turner, however, expressed a doubt of its being entitled to specific rank, and it seems right that it should have been reduced to the position of a variety. Eurhynctiium pumilum, Schp.— Sandy banks in the wood bj- the roadside at Ballymacash, Co. Antrim. From the scant}- records we have for this plant it seems to be rare in Ireland, but it is more likel}', I think, that it has been overlooked. It is usually barren, and, in the absence of fruit, not easily distinguished in the field. In the locality now given it is very abundant, covering a high sandy bank for a distance of many yards. I was successful in finding several tufts with perfect fruit in April. The fruit-stalk being very short, the capsules are only slightly exserted above the dense cushiony ramifications, and not readily detected. Eurhynchium murale, Milde. — Damp walls about Lisburn in both Down and Antrim. It seems a mistake to suppose this species has any special preference for calcareous districts. Common in England. I vsuspect, from what I have seen of it here, it will be found less rare in Ireland than the few stations recorded have led one to suppose. Amblystegium Juratzkanum, Schp. — Stony and peaty ground by the sea, about half a mile east of Kilroot, Co. Antrim, April, 1900. New to the Irish flora. Amongst some tufts of a Bryum of doubtful species collected at Kilroot that I had sent to Mr. Dixon, he informed me that he had met with a few short stems winch he considered might safely be referred to this species. The}- agreed well with specimens of Juratzka's own gathering of the plant. A fragment iy^ The Irish A^ahi> a list. [July, about half an inch long he o1)li^in<^]y returned to me, and pointed out characters by which the speciCvS might be known. So much interest was aroused l)y his kind information that T revisited the locality, when I had the satisfaction of finding it with fruit. It is more robust than A. serpens, with broader leaves, more distant and subsquarrose, and spreading when dr}'. A plant of continental dis- tribution, it was first described as British in a recently published part of Dr. Braithwaite's '' British Moss-P'lora.' At that time it was known only in one locality in Sussex (Mitten, 1893), but has since been met with in other English counties. Amblystcgrium varlum, Lindb.— Stony and peaty ground, close bj- the sea, about half a mile east of Kilroot, Co. Antrim, April, 1900. In my quest for the preceding species another Amblystegiiun was noticed differing alike in habit of growth and general aspect both from A. serpens and A, Jiiraizkannvi. On subsequent examination this proved to be the present species, A. variian, and is also an addition to the Irish moss-flora. Amblystegrium irriguum, B. and S. — On decayed wood in the over- flow^ stream from the reservoir, Magheraleane, Lisburn, Co. Antrim. There seem to be only two other Irish stations known for this plant. Mr. Stewart informs me that he has "found it only in Drumbo Glen, Co. Down, where it was fruiting in summer of 1887, but it was omitted from ' Flora N.E.I ' through an oversight." Moore knew of it only in Roscommon. Perhaps not so rare as appears, since it might be overlooked when not in fruit. HypnuiYi revolvens, Sw. — Boggy places on White Mountain, Co. Antrim. Though noting this plant for only three counties Moore was probably correct in writing " not rare in Ireland." In North-east, we have no mention of it for Derry, but it is frequent amongst the Mourne Mountains, and has also been found near Carrickfergus. Lisburn. I900.] 177 SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS. Sexual Dimorphism in the Animal King^dom, a Theory of the Evolution of Secondary and Sexual Characters. By J. T. Cunningham, m.a. Londou : A. aud C. Black, 1900 : Svo, pp. xi. & 310. Price, 12s. 6d, To criticise is one thing, to construct another. In this book, Mr. Cunningham, whose criticisms of the Wallacian denial of the inheritance of acquired characters have been so efficacious in repelling a lodgment by the followers of Weismann on debateable ground, has himself attempted to occupy it and to build thereon a theory of the application of the transmission of acquired characters to the secondary sexual characters of animals. To do this he has given us a very interesting, if not quite exhaustive account of these characters with many new facts, and this part of his book will, I think, give it a permanent value. But I feel sure that for those of us who are in the same camp as Mr. Cunningham, the better part for the present is to aim at keeping the ground clear, rather than to put up works and push forward wxak forces which will but give fresh occasion for the advances of our leading opponents ; while their inevitable destruction will strengthen the idea prevailing among the enlightened laity, like Mr. Balfour and Mr. Kidd, that the views held by Charles Darwin are now exploded. As follows from what we have just said, the author seeks to demonstrate that secondary sexual characters are the results of the response of the organism to stimulation, either from within or without. Thus, the growth of the beard in Primates is " due to the stimulation of the growth of the hair by teeth or nails in the combats of mature males ;" but on the next page we find: "What is wanted is evidence concerning the influence of mechanical irritation of the hair follicles on the growth of the hair." The probable cause of the loss of the body hair is traced to the wearing of clothes. " In all communities the women pay more attention to the wearing of clothes than men, and this agrees with the fact that women, as a rule, have less hair." In illustration he cites the fact that young animals, like mice and rabbits, born into close warm nests, are naked, and suggests that the carrying of the children on the mother's back, in a fold of some garment, in primitive times, was the cause of the denudation of the infant. On the contrary, the Mandrill is supposed to have acquired the bare grooved patches of its face, by the males scoring one another in their fights for the rarer females, while their coloration elsewhere is explained by the attentions of their mates. Again, the mane of the male Baboons and of the Lion, like the plumes of cock birds, are supposed to have been gained by the habit of these animals of raising them when excited. The development of vocal sacs in the males of mammals, birds, and frogs is more obviously traced to the yielding of the walls of the cavities 178 The Irish Naturalist. [July, under the stress of sexual excitement. Horns are derived from the use of the head in buttini^. In the very interesting discussion of the various kinds of horn no mention is made of the use of the horns in the reindeer for shovelling away snow, as an explanation of their presence in the female. We miss in all this section any attempt to bring these secondary sexual characters into correlation with " recognition marks," so obvious in the deer and antelopes, with their combination of white " sunflower " patches of erectile hair with scent glands, so as to make a double appeal to their fellows. This seems the more remarkable, as it is an obvious suggestion that sexual ornamentation is derived from recognition marks by intensification. The chapters on insects and crustaceans are very interesting, the former dealing, to some extent, with the question of protective mimicry. The book is admirabl}' got up, well written, well illustrated. MarcUvS HarTOG. PROCEEDINGS OF IRISH SOCIETIES. RoYAi. ZooLOGiCAi, Society. Recent gifts include an African Wild Ass from Mr. W. H. Goodwin, three black-headed Gulls from Mr. F. H. Greene, a pair of Crowned Pigeons from Mr. J. N. Lentaigne, a Parrakeet from Mrs. Blair White, a Kestrel from Mr. W. W. Despard, and a Long-eared Owl from Mr. R. Warren. "Five Wolf-cubs have been born in the Gardens. 13,320 persons visited the Gardens during May. Dublin Naturai^ists' Fieinulcc, so hesitate to give an absolute record. At Newcastle, Go. Down, Mr. Patterson collected on the sand- hills and golf links, and succeeded in getting some nice insects. His best capture was Acidota crenata, F., recorded by Mr. Buckle from Buncrana sand-hills. I have recorded it from Armagh and Ardara, but the deter- mination was incorrect, and referable to Olophrum piceum, Gyll. In the present case, as I had made a mistake before about this species, I sent the insect to Mr, G. C. Champion, who kindly confirmed my determina- tion. In addition to this beetle Mr. Patterson captured Aniara trivialis, Gyll. ; Laccophilus interruptus, Panz. ; Hyd} opoj'us lituratus, L. ; Rhantus exoletus, Forst. ; Ocypus viorio, Grav. ; ^Hgialia arenaria, F. ; Geotrupes typhosus, L. $ . On a former occasion Mr. Patterson sent me a male specimen of this Dor-beetle ; Lochmea caprece, L. , the onl}' other Ulster record seems to be my own from Coolmore ; Otiorrhynchus fincscoruf?i, Bris. ; O. rugifrons^ Gyll. ; Philopcdoii geminatus, F. Though a number of these were obtained, and some of considerable size, none of the curious large white form which have occurred in Donegal and Antrim were met with. Near Strandtown — Notiophilus palusiris, Duft. ; a very dark form of Agabus paludosus. F. ; the var. niarginatum^ F., o{ Spharidium bipustulatum, F. ; Staphylmus pubc'scens, De G. ; S. a€sareus,Q.^A&Y. I have met with a few beetles here that are worth mentioning. Under the bark of a fir log I found a colony, consisting of Homalium pusillum, Grav.; H. puncttpetifu; Thorns.; and Rhizophagus depnssus, F. In the bottom of a haystack which I had removed I found great numbers of Typhcea funia!a, L- ; they were clinging to the sides of stones and mingled with hayseed, to which they have a resemblance, and from which an untrained eye would scarcely distinguish them. A single specimen of Lochiiuxa crattegi, Forst. ^ was captured by Mrs. Johnson ; Piinus fur, L-, and Neptus creuatus, F., occurred crawling on walls of outhouses. Earl}' in May I took two specimens of the Hemipteron, Acauthosomn hcemorrhoidale, L., on Cupressiis — they are the green form. I hoped to have met with others, but though I kept a constant watch I was unable to 184 The Insh Naturalist. [July, meet with it again. On May 16 I found Piczodoncs iituralus. Fab., iu great numbers on Furze {Ulcx ciirojja-iis), and I saw them for several days afterwards swarming on the flowers. Mr Saunders says (" Ilemiptera Ileteroptera," p. 31) that it occurs in the autumn, so that either the insect has a different habit here, from what Mr. Saunders observed in England, or else this was an extra brood. I shall watch for it in autumn to see if there is a second brood. Among the Lepidoptera my most interesting record is from Donegal. In the first week of April I had a letter from my friend, W. A. Hamilton, Esq., J. P., of Coolmore, near Ballyshannon, telling me that a couple of days previously he had seen in an empty house a butterfly, which, from his description, I felt pretty sure was the Peacock Butterfly {Vanessa io., L.). This conjecture was liappil}' proved to be correct by my receiving the battered remains of a Peacock Butterfly which Mr. Hamilton had knocked down with his driving whip between Coxtowu and Rossnow- lagh. This is apparently the first time this butterfl}- has been met with in Co. Donegal, for Mr. Kane, in his list of Irish Lepidoptera (' Ento- mologist," xxvi , p. 189), does not mention that county. Vanessa urticcv, L-, was, as usual, the first butterfly to show, but I did not see it till April 15, when it manifested its ecclesiastical tastes b)- appearing iu the church here In May there were a few moths about, and I got a couple of nice specimens of Sclenia ilhinaria, Hb. In August last Mr. Carpenter wrote to tell me that larvae of Smerinthus oce/ia^us, L. , ha.d appeared in numbers at Crowbill, near Lough gall. I wrote to Mr. Joseph Atkinson, D.L., of Crowbill, to ask him to send me any that he could get. He sent me four, but only two arrived. These duly pupated and have now emerged (June ytli and 9th). My friend Mr. Hamilton has sent me a nice specimen of Halias prasinana, L. $ which he caught in his house at Coolmore, Co Donegal, on June 4th. Mr. Barrett (" British Lepidoptera," II., p. 177) notes that this moth has the power of producing a squeaking sound, which it appears to do when on the wing. In reference to Mr. Buckle's queries (ante, p 130), I know of several coleopterists who practice sweeping at night, and by this means get many good species. I have practised myself occasionally, but I seldom got anything of interest ; but that was probably my fault in not going where the insects were waiting to be caught. I never met with Hydroponis Davisii, Curt., but I have with H. seplen- trionolis, Gyll. , and I saw it rise to the surface for air ; but it is very probable that, as Mr. Buckle suggests, it does so at long intervals. In connection with this question of water-beetles coming to the surface for air, can anyone enlighten me as to what happens to water-beetles during frost ? I have myself seen a Dytisciis underneath the ice on which I was skating. I presume there would be a small quantity of air, but during a prolonged frost ihis would probably become exhausted and thus the supply be cut off. If any of the readers of the Irish Naturalist can enlighten me on this matter I shall feel much obliged. Poyntzpass. W. F. Johnson. I900.] Notes. T85 FISHES. Attempted Introduction of the American Shad Into Irish Waters. It was announced in a recent issue of a Dublin daily paper that Mr. Moreton Frewen was about to deposit 100,000 eggs of the American vShad (^Clupca sapidissiDid) in the River Shannon. On my appl3-ing to this gentle- man for further information, he wrote to say that he regretted that the consignment of Shad ova had all perished on their way to Ireland, but that he hoped to make a further trial. As it is probable, therefore, that we shall soon be able to add the American Shad to the list of fishes inhabiting Irish waters, a few remarks about this fish may be of interest to the readers of the Irish Natitralist. In the first place it is perhaps not generally known that we already possess two different kinds of Shad in Ireland. These, like the Salmon, are marine fish which ascend rivers for the purpose of spawning, and in some parts of Ireland (particularly on the Atlantic coast), they seem to be fairly abundant' They are closely allied to the Herring, belonging to the same family {Clupeidix). That they are not highly esteemed as food in Ireland is indicated by the term " bony horses " often applied to them. In England they are known as Twait vShad and Allis Shad. In this country the term " bony horses." "bony horsemen," or " rock-herrings" is probably applied indiscriminately to both species. From a zoological point of view the introduction of foreign species of animals, unless they can be kept within proper bounds, must be looked upon with disfavour, and should be discouraged. In most cases the artificial introduction of species has not proved a blessing, while many introductions have caused enormous financial losses to the countries which they were supposed to benefit. vSuch introductions frequently produce a disturbing influence upon the native fauna, and great caution should therefore be exercised in adding new members to it. Moreover, it is almost certaii: that Irish people w^ould not take very readily to the American Shad, although it is said to be a much finer flavoured fish than our own. I do not know whether Irish rivers contain very much more food than our 3'oung Trout and Salmon require. If not, the latter would have to divide their daily rations of small Crustacea and insect larvae with the newcomers, who, at any rate, would never possess the same commercial value as Salmon and Trout. It might however be argued (as Mr. Frewen has done very ingeniously in the NinetcciUJi Ceiilury, vol. 46, 1899, p. 399), that the Shad fry would be invaluable as a food supply'for our older river Trout and Salmon smolts, so that the great depredations of the latter fish amongst their own kind would be avoided. We look forward to Mr, Moreton Frewen's experiments with great interest, and hope that he may be correct in his supposition that the introduction of the American Shad will prove of very great benefit to Irish fisheries. R. F, SCHARFF. Science and Art Museum, Dublin, 1 86 The Irish Naturalist. [Jul}', 1900. BIRDS. Birds' Nests In Strange Places. I have at present (May 24) two birds' uests in a rather unusual place. A new hay-shed was put up last summer — timber with iron roof; need- less to say it is quite empty now. There is a large square tie-beam going across underneath the roof. An American hand-rake was left lying with its head on this beam and the end of the handle resting on the wall plate. On the head of this rake— just on the wooden bows that are used to strengthen the heads of such rakes — a Blackbird has built her nest and is hatching quite contentedl}', while only a few yards away a Song-thrush has built hers on the smooth, white surface of the wall plate. The shed is in a very unfrequented place, so that I hope the young songsters may get away safely. Last June I saw a Wild Duck hatching on top of a wall more than 15 feet high on Devenish Island in Lough Erne, Query, how did she expect to get the young ones down } Corr, Cornafean. John A. Faris. Birds of Ireland and S\AAltzerIand. In the Zoologist for May, 1900, Messrs, C. J. Patten and W. J. Williams publish a paper in which they record in comparative form a number of observations on the relative frequency of birds in Ireland and Switzer- land. Curious Note of a Cuckoo. A Cuckoo has come to this place regularly for the past ten summers (the length of time I have been in the locality), and does not seem to move far from the house. Its voice is the most peculiar I ever heard, being a cross between a stutter and a hiccough, and some seasons it has been very bad, other seasons not quite so bad, but continues the same the whole season through. Can any reader account for this oddity, or say how long a Cuckoo lives .-' Killinchy, Co. Down. J. G. Burton. MAMMALS. Wlartcn in Co. Londonderry. On June 4th, 1900, a fine male Marten {Martes sylvaticd) was caught in a rabbit-trap on the river-bank at The Umbra, Benone, near Magilligan, and sent to the Belfast Museum. The fur was almost black. It had been in the neighbourhood for some time, as an underkeeper had seen it twice on the mountain and wondered what it was ; it then took up its quarters near the river, as it had worn a regular j^ath to the edge of the water, being probably attracted by the numerous young Waterhens at present there. It was caught at day- break, as its cries were heard at that time. Belfast. Robert Patte;rson. Irish Naturalist, Vol. IX.] [Plate 6. Map showing Occurrences of the Ruff ix Ireland. To face p. 187. August, 1900.] 187 THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE RUFF. By CHARLES J. PATTEN, B.A., M,D. [Read before the Dublin Naturalists' Field Club, February 20, 1900.] (Pirate 6.) There are certain species of migratory birds included in the Irish fatina which cannot be considered as absohitely rare, still they occur in such limited numbers, and their visits to our country are of such a brief duration, that they are liable to escape the observations of many ornithologists. Of such birds the Ruff — Machetes pugnax (lyinn.) — is a good example. It probably occurs in Ireland every autumn, but still is by no means plentiful. The late eminent ornithologist, Mr. A. G. More, mentions it as " a rare visitor^ chiefly in autumn," ^ and many other observers agree likewise on this subject. The question as to whether the particulars of each and every occurrence of the Ruff should be fully recorded or not is an important matter for consideration. There seems to be a difference of opinion on the subject. Some ornithologists seem to think the bird too common. For my own part I think it is well worth while collecting information of as full a nature as possible concerning the occurrence of the Ruff in Ireland. The bird is, to my mind, sufficiently rare for such research. This is evident when we hear that all the records known of the Ruff as a visitor to our shores when compiled number approximately only about 86. At first sight these numbers may seem large, but, consider- ing that the records date^ from the year 1821' up to the present {i.e.. a period of nearly 80 years), it is very unlikely that the total number of birds occurring each year could be very large. Since I last published notes on the occurrence of the Ruff in Dublin Bay {Irish Naturalist, vol. viii., p. 225), I have endeavoured to extend my knowledge on the natural history of this bird. I have lately received some valuable information from correspondents and have added new specimens to my collection for the purposes of examination and comparison. ^ Life and Letters of A. G. More, p. 601. = To Mr. TJssher I am largely indebted for notes on this part of the subject. I have also consulted Thompson, and Watters' " Birds of Ire- land," the Proceedings of the Dublin Natural History Society. &C., &C-;, from which sources I have obtained much information. A 1 88 The Irish Naturalist. [August, It should be remembered that the Riiff, like many other wading birds, becomes still scarcer on our coast lands as autumn advances, consequently it afforded me no small amount of interest when I obtained an immature specimen on the nth of October, last year {i.e., ^899), shot by Mr. \V. Walker at the North Bull, Dublin Bay, and forwarded to me by Mr. K- Williams. But the late date of occurrence was not the only interesting point about this specimen, for in addition it had ab'cady assumed almost completely its winter phimage. Immature Ruffs generally leave our coavSts while still in autumn garb, hence the increased value of a specimen obtained in winter plumage. I made a comparison between the plumages of some imma- ture autumn specimens and that of the winter Ruff' and found that they differed considerably. Autumn. = At this time of year the feathers of the forehead and crown are blackish brown, edged with buff. Those of the occiput and nape are nut brown, with faintly marked black centres. The cheeks, ear coverts, and lore are rufous coloured, and faintly speckled. Under the chin is a wdiite triangular patch. From this a faintly marked white line extends upwards and backwards under the ear coverts. The ante-orbital feathers are light grey. The whole throat (upper and lower regions) and breast are of a rich buff colour. The abdomen and undertail coverts are wdiite. The rectrices are greyish, with black tips and rufous edges. The middle upper tail coverts and lower back feathers are dark brown, with dull rufous edges. The outer upper tail coverts are white. The inter-scapulars, scapulars and tertiaries are black, with rnfous edges. The wing coverts greyich brown, edged similarly. The secondaries are dark grey, with white edges, the primaries being dull black or very dark brown. The small leg feathers are dun-coloured, slightly mixed with white. Any slight differences which exist between the plumages of the male and female in autumn are to be found chiefly in the region of the breast and throat. In the female these are often of a richer buff colour, which may extend further backwards towards the abdomen than in the case of the male. Mr. Williams has kindly allowed me to examine his pair of immature Ruffs shot 2Sth August, 1S97. They are particularly well-marked, and ^ In autumn and winter the males and females are practically alike in plumage. ^ Inasmuch as the feathers are liable to fade after death, even in well- preserved specimens, I have taken notes on the colour of the plumage while the birds were still in the flesh in a freeh condition. T900.] Patten. — The Natural History of the Ruff. ] 89 the shading of the feathers is very rich. The owner pointed out to me the following minor differences in the plumages of the two sexes. Firstly : the difference in the shade and distribution of the buff-coloured feathers already described. In the female these reach almost as far back as the under tail coverts, hence a considerable amount of the abdominal feathers are buff-coloured. In the male the buff stops short about the middle of the abdomen. Secondly : the rufous edges of the scapulars and inter- scapulars are broader in the female than in the male, and the central portions of these feathers are darker in the former sex. Thirdly ; the tertiaries of the female are crossed with bars of black and buff,^ whereas in the male the same feathers are only edged with these colours. Winter. Feathers of the forehead, crown, nape, and occiput ashy grey in colour, with indistinctly marked darkish centres. The cheeks, ear coverts,^ chin, lore, and upper throat are of a dirty white color.^ The lower throat and breast feathers are lightish grey, dappled with faintly marked irregular and broken transverse bars of a darker grey colour. The ante- orbital feathers are dark grey. The abdomen and under tail coverts are white, as in autumn. The rectrices are dappled grey and white. The upper tail coverts and lower back feathers are similar in colour to those of the autumn plumage, except that the rufous edges have nearly dis- appeared. The inter-scapulars, scapulars and tertiaries are grey, with dirty white-coloured margins. The tertiaries are in addition tipped with black. The secondaries and wing coverts are also grey, the white edges being more distinct. •* The primaries resemble those of the autumn plumage. The leg feathers are dapoled grey and white. It is not m}^ intention in this article to enter into a detailed account of the occurrence of each Ruff hitherto observed in Ireland. Most of the facts concerning these have been already published. It ib more expedient to draw up a table containing many important statistics of the history of the Ruff as a visitor to Ireland. In this way it may be possible to review any changes which may have taken place in the dis- tribution of this bird in time and space. In the fifth column of the Table, M stands for male, F for female. In the sixth column, A = adult, and I = immature. In the seventh column, N = nuptial plumage, A = autumn plumage, W = winter plumage, S = summer plumage. ■" I did not find this condition of the autumn plumage in all female Ruffs examined. 2 The ear coverts are fairly dappled with grey. ^ In the winter, the white patch under the chin passes continuously into the same colour of the cheeks and lore. 4 In autumn the white edge is narrow and less defined. A 2 igo The Ijish Nahiralist. [August, Tabulated Records of Rufes from Irei^and since 1S21.* Number. Year. Month. County. Sex. Age. Plumage 3 1821 May, . Derry, . M. A. N. 2 j> Sept., . Down, . ? A. 6 1822 August, , >i ? A. 2 1828 >> Antrim, F. + .? A. I 1833? ? Dublin, p A. I 1833 August, . Down, . M. A. I 1835 j> >> F. A. A. I or 2 >> Sept., , j> M.+F. + .? A+A+I. A. I or 2 >> >) >> M. + F. + .? A+A+I. A. "1 1837 1838 p ? Donegal, p ? • A. A. 3 >» Sept., . Down, p • ? 3 j> Nov. , >> p ? ? 6 »> March, . Kildare, M. A. W. I 1840 Sept., . •J • ? ? I 1841 >> Down, . p p .? 2 1842 >> )♦ M. A. S. 2 1844 >> >) p p p I 1845 October, >> ? • ? 2 I 1847 1847 October, and Nov. ? Kildare, Dublin, p p p ? p • I 1848 October, Down, . F. p p 2 1848 August, . Tipperary, • M. A. s. 4 1848 >> )) ? ? ? I 1849 October, Waterford, . F. .? ? ■1 1850 Nov., Antrim, F. ? ? or 1851 j> >> F. ? ? I 1853 ? Wicklow, p ? ? * Excluding those recorded from unknown counties. 1900] Pattkn. — The Natural History of the Ruff. 191 Number. Year Month. County. Sex. Age. Plumage. I 1864 ? Roscommon, M. ? 2 1870 Sept., . Dublin, M + F. I- A. 2 1880 33 Armagh, M + F. I- A. I or 2 1884 ? 33 ? ? I 5> Sept., . Sligo F. A. I 1888 ? Kildare, ? ? 3 1887 Sept., . Down, . ? ? I 1889 33 Mayo, . ? I- A. I 3> August, . Galway, ? X • A. I >> / October, Cork, . F. !• A. I I 1890 before 1891 35 ? Waterford, . Donegal, F. M. ? N. I ?? 9 33 ? ? I 1891 Sept., . Mayo, . ? ? 2 1892 33 Donegal, ? ? I 2 ■-1 I 5) before 1893 1894 or 1895 1895 October, August, . 33 Roscommon, Dublin, Wicklow, M. ? F. F. ^ i ? ? ? A. I 1896 Sept., . Sligo, . M. A. 2 5J 33 Mayo, . ? ? I J) 3> Wexford, M. A. I 35 February Cork, . ? W. I 3 J Sept., . Dublin, M. A. 2 1897 August, . 33 M + F. A. I 1899 Sept., . it F. A. 2 33 October, 33 F+M. A + W. I 55 August, . Cork, . ? ? 192 7 he Irish Nat2iralist. [August, From the above table it ma}^ be seen that the Ruff has occurred in iS counties out of the 32, that is in more than half of the total number. It has visited the coastlands of all four provinces (Ulster, Munster, Leinster, Connaught), but has been most frequently seen in Ulster and lycinster — CvSpecially the counties of Down and Dublin. At the time when Thompson wrote it evidently visited the North-eastern coastlands of Ireland more frequently than other districts. Still, I think, had this species been better known by other ornithologists at the time, that more records from the I^einster coast should have been published. Along the Ueinster coast no more suitable localit}^ could be found for the Ruff than the extensive mudslobs and grassy slopes of the North Bull, Dublin Ba}-, and I have little doubt that if this bird w^ere more eagerly sought for that it would be oftener observ^ed. The table further .shows that the Ruff is more often found in August and September than at any other time of year, also that the vast majorit}^ of birds taken were immature\ in the autumn plumage. As the 3'oung birds often go in pairs, the sexes in autumn seem rather evenly divided. In the spring, according to Thompson's records, it is chiefly males that have been captured, often in batches, up to six in number. This is an interesting fact, as manj^ observers consider that the females on the wdiole are more numerous than the males. Subsequent to the publication of Thompson's valuable work there have not been many Ruffs noticed in Ireland. Watters, who wrote much about the same time as Thompson, mentions two specimens obtained on the Bog of Allen in July, 1850. Few occurrences of the Ruff are recorded in the Proceedings of the Dubliu Natural Histor>^ Society between 1849 and 1S71. During these years the Ruff^ seems to have visited Ireland in smaller numbers than during the earlier parts of the century. It may be suggested that perhaps it was overlooked. This ^ Unfortunately the sexes and ages of man)' specimens were not determined. =" Nat. Hist, of Ireland, vol. ii., p. 230 to 232. 1900.] Patten.— 77^^ Natiiral History of the Ric^. 193 can liardl}' have been the case to any great extent, as many careful and arduous observers were working at ornithology at that period, a period indeed which marks a distinct era in the science in Ireland {vide Proceedings of the Dublin Natural History Society). Although the Ruff may, to a certain extent, be overlooked, it is nevertheless more often observed than many other wading birds of equal scarcity for the following reasons : — Firstly, with respect to the locality which it frequents. It is found not only on the seashore and mudflat, but also inland, on moor and hillside. Hence, it runs the double chance of being vshot both by the ordinary sportsman (out perhaps after grouse, &c.), and by the scientific collector. Sportsmen, though often possessing only a very meagre knowledge of ornitholog}', are, as a rule, keen observers, and so few strange birds pass them unnoticed. Secondly, the Ruff is a good sized bird, and easily seen. Thirdl}', it is usually tame, can be approached without difficulty, identified, and easily shot. In the year 1870 Blake Knox records two Ruffs (a male and a female) from Dublin Bay. They were immature birds shot in September.^ Nine years afterwards the late Dr. Cox^ wrote a most admir- able article on the " Birds of the Co. Dublin and Wicklow," and although he was an accurate observer, it is most remark- able that he did not mention the Ruff as occurring in Dublin Ba}^ and so did not include it in his list. Hence it is likely that the Ruff was scarcer in that locality in the time of Cox than it is now. This is the more confirmed by the fact that for many years past Mr. Williams has been looking out for Ruffs in Dublin Ba}^ and did not shoot any till 1897, Furthermore, I have recorded several instances of Ruffs from Dublin Bay, all of v.'hich have occurred only quite recently. {Irish Naturalist, vol. viii.). Mr. Williams, however, informs me that the two Ruffs in the Irish Collection of Birds (Science and Art Museum, Dublin) were shot by the late Dr. Cox on the River Bann in September, i88o. They are an immature male. and female. ■• Zoologist, 1870, p. 2410. ^ Zoologisl, 1879. 194 The Irish Nahiralht. [August, As in the case of the IrhJi A^atiiralist, so, too, in the Zoolooist, few records of the Ruff from Ireland have been publislied of late years. Briefl}^, they are as follows : — ^September Sth, 1S84.— One shot by Mr. Little (whilst looking for grouse) on a lone flat moor near Tullylin, Co. vSligo. He presented it to Mr. Warren, who draws attention to the fact it was W\^ first vict ivith in the zvestern district of Ireland. (Mr. Ussher informs me that it had occurred in Roscommon in 1864.) In 1896- there seems to have been a small immigration of Ruffs to the west and south of Ireland. On September 4th Mr. C. Gallagher shot a male on a grouse bog, a few miles from the town of Easky, Co. Sligo. He gave it to Mr. Warren. The bird was solitary and ver}' tame. Mr. Williams received three the same autumn, and Mr. R. J. Ussher had two sent to him from Belmullet, Co. Mayo. (See also Tabulated Records, p. 191.) Mr. R. M. Barrington kindly informs me by letter that he purchased a Ruff in the Cork markets in Februar}^ 1896. Mr. Williams preserved it and tells me that it is a beautiful male in full winter plumage. It only remains to mention, regarding the occurrence of the Ruff in Ireland, that, assuming that it has not been over- looked to any great extent, it seems to have been most fre- quent during Thompson's time (having occasionall}^ occurred on its vernal migration), to have subsequently diminished in numbers, and to have, of recent years, been visiting our shores in larger numbers again. As a vernal migrant it has not for many years been noticed. Possibly its geographical distribution in Ireland is spreading. This still remains to be fully seen. However, in Thompson's time, with the exception of a few records from Kildare, Dublin, Wicklow,Tipperary, Waterford, Clare, (?) and Kerry, (?) the Ruff was confined in its visits to the north-eastern coast, especially Down and Antrim. (See Table, p. 190-1.) Later, in 1864, it spread to Roscommon, where it has been seen as late as 1893. Lastl}^ during the past 20 years, it has been ol)served several times in Armagh, Sligo, Mayo, Wexford, Cork, and once in Galway. (Table.) ^ R. Warren iu 'Zoologist, 1884, p 429. ' R. Warren in Zoologist, 1896, p. 384. I900.] Patten. — The Natural History of the Ruff. 195 Tt is to be hoped that thivS species will extend its range in Ireland, so that it may become better known. It is a bird the habits and structure of which afford a very interesting field of research. Before concluding this part of the subject I append a table showing how the Ruff has been observed in Ireland during the nineteenth century :— TABUI.AR VI RW OF THE EaRI^IEST AND LATEST RECORDS FROM EACH Irish County. Couuty. First Year recorded. Last Year recorded. Down, ..... 1821 1887 Derry, ..... 1821 1891 Antrim, . . . . 1828 1851 Dubliu, ... 1833 1899 Donegal,. . . . . 1837 1891 Kildare, ..... 1838 1888 Tipperar}^ .... 1848 Waterford, .... 1849 1890 Wicklow, .... 1853 1895 Roscommon, .... 1864 1893 Armagh, . , . . 1880 1884 SHgo, 1884 1896 Mayo, ..... 1889 1891 Galway, ..... 1889 Cork, ..... 1889 1899 Wexford, .... 1896 Clare, . - . . . • ? Kerry, ..... ? ? 196 The Irish Natioalist. [August, Having thus dwelt for some length on the histor}- of the Ruff as a visitor to Ireland, I will now briefly touch upon its general morphological characters. In no group of birds are the external sexual differences so marked. In the case of most waders the males and females differ but little in size, and still less in their plumage. The Ruff stands out in marked contrast to other waders in this respect. Before I point out the differences to be noted between the male and female, it should be remembered that in many other respects, both in structure and habits of life^ the Ruff resembles such well-known birds as the Redshank, Godwit, Sandpiper, Knot, Sanderling, Dunlin, Snipe, &c., &c. To these it claims close affinities, and is thus included not only in the same large order, Limicolcc, but even in the same family of ScolopacidcB. The generic name of Jllachctes has onl}' been given to the Ruff b}' Cuvier^ on account of its pugnacious habits, w4th some minor structural differences, and not because it differs to any marked degree from the rest of the familj- ScolopacidcB ; indeed, the great sj'stematist, Linnaeus, included the Ruff in the genus Triiiga!^ It therefore seems extraordinary how this bird has come to differ so much from, other "w^aders" in special structural characters (mainly sexual) and in habits of life. Sexual differences in size and eolo7ir. — In autumn the imma- ture plumage of the male and female is practically identical. Likewise in winter both sexes are similarly attired.^ Yet the difference in size between the two sexes is so apparent that when they are compared there is no difficulty in determining them. The average-sized male is fully one-third larger than the average-sized female. In spring and early summer the male alters his plumage very much, assuming at that time of year his characteristic " frill," which serves to distinguish him. This is his nuptial plumage, which I wall refer to again later ■■ Regne Animal, i., p. 490 (1817). 2 Tringa pugjiax, Linnaeus. Syst. NaL, Ed. 12, i., p. 247 (1766). 3 In the " Descent of Man," p. 390, Darwin stated that the sexes differ in winter pUimage. If they do the difference is practically imperceptible. I900.J Patten. — The Natural Histojy of the Rtiff. 197 on. At the same time of year the female changes but little from her winter dress (see winter plumage of Ruff, p. 189); she simply becomes more spotted with black, brown, chestnut, and grey. These colours replace many of the more sombre greyish-brown winter feathers of the upper and under parts. I now return to the differences in size between the two sexes. Thanks to the courtesy and kindness of Mr. Williams I have from time to time been able to examine a good number of Ruffs in the flesh. These I have supplemented by an examin- ation of dry skins kindly placed at my disposal by Mr. Carpenter, of the Science and Art Museum. Even in the same sex variation in size is apparent. I found this more so in the females. In addition to the ordinary measurements given in text books, such as' the total length of the bird and the length of the wing, I have added some more, with a view of determining more precisely the external sexual differences. Out of a large number examined the following are the avera2:e measurements at which I have arrived : — Mai^E. Femai^e;. Total length, Length of wing, . Rxpanse of wings, Sternum to cloaca, Mid-back to breast, Breadth of mid-breast, . I Tibio-tarsus, IvCgS J ( Tarso-metatarsus, Ivength of beak, . Nostril, Inches. T2l 23i 34 2\ If 2-^ 2j I* 1 •t Inches, lOi 211 3 If 1} 2t If li 1 4 . I wish to call attention to the fact that I measured the wings from the carpal joint to the end of the first flight feather. igS The Irish Naturalist. [August, It may be seen from the foregoing measurements that in both the male and the female the wing is the same length, viz., 6j inches. Hence the first flight feathers are the same length in the two sexes ; but the expanse of wings (length from the tip of one extended wing to that of the other) is greater in the male than in the female. This, therefore, must be due to the upper and fore wing being longer in the male. This I found to be true, as the humerus, ulna, and radius of the latter are longer than those of the former. The body of the female is smaller proportion atel}^ than that of the male, but much of the same shape, as shown b}^ the relative measurements. The same remarks apply to the legs. The bill, however, is much the same length in both sexes ; moreover, it is very constant in length, in that respect differing from many waders (Dunlin, Sanderling, Curlew. &c.), in which the length of the bill, even of the same sex, is very variable. It should be noted, however, that the base of the bill of the male Ruff is stouter than that of the female. The colour of the legs and toes var}^, not only according to sex, but also at different seasons of the year, as follows : — ■* Male (immature), Female, ,, Male (nuptial plumage), Female (summer), Male (adult, winter), . Female, „ Colour of legs aud toes. Dark greenish black. Dark brown. Dull orange. Same colour, but a little paler. Light brown. jj Difference in weight between the two sexes : — With a variation in size between the two sexes we expect a variation in weight. The average-sized male weighs 6 ounces ; the female 4 ounces. Most writers agree on this point, and judging from the specimens which I weighed mj^self, I find that I have arrived at a similar rCvSult. Extreme sexual differences in size a7id ivcioht : — The female Ruff, shot on Balbriggan Strand on 3rd October (Irish Nat., vol. viii., p. 225), was very small, and all measurements were ■" Mr. Williams pointed out to me the difference in colour between the immature male and female legs on the specimens which he shot on 28th August, 1897. In these pair the colours were well marked. sgoo.] Px\TTEN. — The Natural History of the Ruff. 199 under those of the average given. It only weighed 2^ ounces. It was in poor condition, being probably somewhat exhausted after its migratory flight. The female Ruff, shot by Mr. Williams i^Irish Nat., vol. viii., p. 225), was exceptionally large and weighed 5^ ounces, being only half an ounce lighter than the male shot the same day. There is an important point to be noticed in connection with this observation. For, as a rule, when a pair of immature Ruffs are shot early in the seaso7i as these were, and they differ onl}^ slightly in size, it is the male that is smaller than the average, and not the female larger. This points to the fact that the males grow more slowly than the females, as is the case with many other animals. Sir R. Payne Gallwey' has seen male Ruffs which only weighed 5 ounces, and according to Mr. YarrelP and Mr. Saunders^ a fatted Ruff will weigh as much as 10 ounces. Variations in the nuptial plumage of the male: — The assump- tion of the nuptial " frill " of the male is in itself a most remarkable phenomenon, occurring as it does in a single genus of the large family of Scolopacidae. But the variation in this plumage is stranger still, and constitutes a theme, the explana- tions of which might baffle some of our most brilliant orni- thologists. It is a well known fact to ornithologists* that for a short season of the year, during the months of May and June, the neck feathers are greatl}^ changed. They undergo special development, and becoming elongated and much curved the)^ form a '* frill " or " rufl"" from which the bird receives its name. Now most observers point out that " scarcely any two males have the ' ruff' alike ;" and whilst laying emphasis on this point they omit to mention that most of the rest of the plumage varies at the same time. In other words, it is not only the neck feathers of one bird which difter from those of another, but also the greater part of the rest of the ^ " Letters to Young vShooLers," 3rd series, p. 439. = " British Birds," 4th Edit., vol. iii., p. 453, 1884. 3 " Manual of British Birds," p. 600, 1899. " The Right Hon. Lord Lifford, F.L.S., kept Ruflfs in his aviary, and states that by March 15 "they are beginning to resume their shows" (^Zoologist, 1896, p. 51). A 4 200 The Irish Nat2iralisi. [August^ plumage.^ True it is that some few observers have pointed out that the feathers of the upper parts vary also, and Sir R. Payne Galhvey- mentions that the variation generally corre- sponds in tint with the bird's " ruff." But when a number of Ruffs in nuptial plumage are examined it will be founds in the majority of cases, that not only do the feathers of the neck and back vary correspondingl}' in colour, but also those of the top of the head, the breast, and upper part of the abdomen. Now, whilst I freely admit that no bird varies as much in plumage as the Ruft, still I maintain that this variation is restricted to certain definite limits, and so an indefinite number of indiscriminate colours are prevented from appearing. Were this not so it would be well nigh impossible to offer an}' explanation for the cause of the variet}^ in the nuptial plumage. It is highly important to note that although the shades of the nuptial plumage differ a good deal in intensity, nevertheless the fundamental colours from which these are derived are few in number. Thus, out of a number of Ruffs examined onl}^ three types of plumages can be recognized. These, however, are decidedly distinct. They are :— those in which the predomi- nating colour is (i.) Purple-black. (2.) Rich reddish brown. (3.) Yellow, often mixed with white. According to Sir R. Payne Gallwey the reddish brown is the most common, and the 3-ellow and white the rarest. Some nine years ago, when Ruffs used to be imported as an article of food from the Holland markets to Ireland, Mr. Williams picked out three specimens from a large number on sale in the Dublin markets. These birds were in their nuptial plumage, the '* frill " being well developed. They since have come into my possession, and I find that they conform to the three types alreadj- mentioned. The following is a brief description of their plumage : — No. I. Head and upper part of the " ruff" puvplish black, exhibiting nietalhc sheen or lustre when seen by reflected Hght. Cheeks and rest of "ruff" transversely barred and splashed with black and white. Breast feathers mostly purplish black, tipped white, some old winter 1 To be exact it should be borne in mind that the primaries, second- aries, lower abdominal and undertail feathers are practically the same colour in all RulTs. " Letters to Young Shooters," p. 441, igoo.] Patten. — The Natural Histojy of the Ru.ff. 201 feathers being still present. Abdomen and under tail coverts, dirty white, ■with a few black spots. Thigh feathers, dark brown and white. Inter- scapulars and scapulars, rich glossy purple black, some feathers being finel}' edged with light yellowish white. Tertiaries, half barred with black and white, and indistinctly spotted. Lower back and upper •-central tail coverts, mostly old winter feathers, but some transverseh- T^arred like the tertiaries, tlie bars extending -right across the feathers. Outer and upper tail coverts, dirty white. Rectrices, brown; inner ones barred at the extremities like the tertiaries. Wing coverts, principal!)" old winter feathers, the new ones being banded black and v/hite, chiefly at their extremities. Secondaries and primaries, same as in winter. No. 2. Entire head and neck, including the " ruff," rich reddish brown ; man}' of the feathers, especially of the upper throat and cheeks, tipped with purplish black, and exhibiting a faint metallic sheen on reflected light. Breast, rich brown, dapped with purple black, chiefly at the points of the feathers. Abdomen and under tail coverts, dirty white. Thigh feathers, reddish brown. Inter-scapulars and scapulars, richly variegated with reddish bro\<-n and glossy purple black. vSome feathers thinly •edged with buff. Tertiaries, barred regularly and transversely with bands ■of black and chestnut, the edges of the feathers being tipped with buff. Lower back and upper tail coverts, dapped brown and black and cross barred. The outer upper tail coverts contain much white. Rectrices : — •outer, brown ; central barred with chestnut and black and tipped with l)uff. Wing coverts, mostly winter feathers, but some new variegated ■ones resembling the tertiaries. Secondaries and primaries, same as in winter. No. 3. Throat, head, upper, and back part of "ruff" pale "Naples" yellow, delicately streaked on the top of head and cheeks with black. Remainder of " ruff." white, with a few glossy black feathers interspersed. Breast, {a) man}' dirty greyish white feathers— old winter plumage, {b) A few new black feathers tipped with yellow. Abdomen and under tail coverts, dirty white ; a few^ tipped wnth black. Thigh feathers, light brow^n and white. Inter-scapulars and scapulars, variegated yellow and black, being beautifully peppered with fine black dots. Tertiaries transversely barred, with yellow and black, spots of black being inter- spersed amongst most of the yellow bars. Lower back and inner upper tail coverts principally old wnnter feathers, the new ones resembling the tertiaries. Outer upper tail coverts, white. Outer rectrices brown, loner barred at the end like the tertiaries, and faintly spotted. Wing coverts, mostly old winter feathers, the few^ new ones being barred like the tertiaries, the yellow being somewhat duller. Primaries and secondaries, same as in winter Of these three birds, No. i exhibits the greatest amount of gloss on the feathers. No. 2 is the largest and possesses the best developed " ruff," the feathers of which are very long; curved,'' and wavy. Some of the feathers are moderately 1 Some of the "ruff" feathers measured 2\ inches. 202 The Irish Naturalist. [August. glossy. No. 3 is the smallest. Its " frill" is least developed, and the feathers show almost no sigii of g^loss. The im- portance of these facts will be discussed presently. The ground is now somewhat cleared, so that an attempt may be made to answer two much vexed and contended questions, i. For what function is the " ruff" or " frill "" developed ? 2. Why are its feathers of such rich and varied colours in different examples ? The first question has been fullj^ dealt with, and in connection with it many explanations have been offered. When Darwin first enunciated in a definite way his theory of Sexual Selection^ he took the Ruff among other birds as a tj'pical example to illustrate the " I^aw of Battle." The males (poh'gamous in nature like many gallinaceous birds) fight for the possession of the females. Space does not permit me to describe the combat.^ Sufiice it to say that the neck feathers are erected resembling a shield, which is supposed to protect the more tender parts. The shield-like function of the "ruff" feathers has been pointed out by Montagu, subsequently mentioned b}^ Darwin, and advocated by others. But that this is not the main function of these feathers is shown by the following facts : — Firstly. — The nature of the " frill" feathers. They are soft^ wav>% and offer but little protection. Secondly. — Their position. Assuming even that the}' protect tender partSy some of the most vital parts are exposed to danger, for the shield is absent over the head and face and wattles, regions which in other fighting birds are frequently injured. Thirdly. — According to Montagu every feather, as well as those of the "frill," is more or less distended. Hence it is likely that the cause of this general erection is one simply of anger or excitement.^ Fo2irthly. — Ruffs fight at other times of the year. Why are they not always protected by a neck shield ? 1 "Descent of Man," p. 360. - Macgillivray, " Hist. Brit. Birds," vol. iv., 1852. Also Yarrell "British Birds," vol. iii., p. 427 to 434 ; and other standard manuals. 3 J. T. Cunningham points out that erection or display of feathers is often invariably associated with excessive development. (Sexual Dimor- phism, 1900, pp 108-154-155.) 1900.] Patten. — The N'aficral History of the Ricff. 203 Fijthly. — According to Montagu, Ruffs seldom injure each other. This is not because the shield protects them, for the parts exposed are seldom scratched. It is because the beak is soft and weak, like that of other waders and so incapable of inflicting a severe wound. Hence the possession of a shield is unnecessary. Lastly. — If the " frill" only functioned as a shield why should it possess such rich, handsome, and varied colours ? The probable function of the modified neck feathers is to serve as an ornament, as already pointed out by Darwin and others. This brings us on to the second question, viz. : For what reason is the "frill" and, indeed, the nuptial plumage generally so rich and variable? It is now generally believed by many observers that most female animals, including birds, exercise a certain amount of choice in the selection of their mate. Darwin lays stress on the fact that the more highly ornamented males are those more often selected. Hence if we assume that the female Ruff is particularl3^ fastidious in her choice, then by a process of sexual selection not only might the colours of the males become highly ornamental, but even the feathers might tend to vary in colour. But this is an a priori argument, and is only begging the question. We have no evidence of the female Ruff being more particular in her choice than any other birds of the same sex. However there is evidence to show^ that it is not the victorious conqueror that is chosen by the female,^ inasmuch as the battle between the male Ruffs generally ends in a scoreless draw, and so, I think, we are .safe in assuming that in the case of Ruffs the female exercises her sense for the beautiful, and selects the most ornamental and vigorous looking male. It might be asked, why do the males fight when the females are more numerous ? For two reasons : firstly, the females only choose certain males, and so the latter sex enter into a competition of warfare to "cut each other out." Secondly, although the males are actually less numerous than the females, they have no ob- jection to any number of waves (polygani}^), and so fight among themselves to attain this end. Thus, through the females exercising their selective powers, the male descendants have kept up the richl} -ornamented nuptial plumage. So ^ Differing in this respect from many gallinaceous birds. 204 The Irish Naticralist. [August, much for the evidence beiug in favour that the " frill" is ornamental in function. But we still ask, why do these orna- mental feathers vary so much ? Without making any assumptions this question is a most difficult one to answer. Wallace points out that constanc}^ of colours maybe explained on the principle of protective colouration. The females require this more for hatching, &c. Hence they are more sombre plumed. Hence we may argue that where protection is actually unnecessary and even injurious in the economy of nature, coloration may become inconstant and even varied. This is, in part, advocating Stolzmann's^ views. According to him it is often advantageous that many male birds be destroyed by their natural enemies, more especially if polygamous, because the females^ when hatching, may be disturbed by a male which has not found a mate. Now, inasmuch as the male Ruffs seldom injure each other in battle, and so their numbers are not diminished, and moreover they aspire to keeping many wives, I maintain that the result must be that many males never get the chance of mating. Hence in reality, in the economy of nature there are a number of superfluous males. They require to be destroyed, and so natural selection, which only attends to the preservation of species, ceases now to act. Thus the male plumage, no longer conservative in colour for any protective purpose, may undergo a considerable amount of variation. It is worth suggesting that age may also have something to do with the variation in the nuptial plumage. The excitable, highly- strung, polj-gamous nature of Ruffs may have brought about a plumage change comparable to w4iat takes place in a much less marked degree among other waders normally as age advances. Thompson- states that when visiting the London Zoological Gardens, Regent's-park, in 1833, the Keeper, Mr. Hunt, in- formed him that a bird in captivity for two or three years assumed a different " ruff" each summer. Mr. R. Ball noticed the same in the Dublin Zoological Gardens. He states that a Ruff received in full plumage changed twice. Montagu and Bartlett,^ on the contrary, maintain that the nuptial plumage ^ Proc. Zool. Soc, 1S85. = "Nat. Hist, of Ireland," vol. ii., p. 233. 3 Yarrell " British Birds," vol. iii., p- 433- 1900.] Fatten. — The Natural History of the Riiff. 205 never varied in confinement. These two conflicting statements are most interesting. I should not lay so much stress on the fact that some Ruffs retai7t the same nuptial plumage. 'Some birds in captivit}^ never even assume theirnuptialplnmageatall. This is due no doubt to captivity affecting their reproductive system. A case in point is that of a Knot^ {Trifiga camitus) at present in the Dublin Zoological Gardens, which throughout, the year has retained its winter plamage. On the contrary I have observed gulls in captivity change from winter to summer plumage with great rapidity. Hence it appears that observations made on plumage changes of birds in captivity hardly gives up a true insight as to what happens in a state of nature. Judging from analogies and comparisons, I am inclined to think that the three types of Ruff already described (pp. 200-2) represent three different ages betw^een which slight variations may occur. Those with the yellowish-white frill may be the youngest^ ; for they are the smallest, have the "frill" least developed, and show almost no gloss on the plumage. The reddish-brown birds are probably older ; they are, on an average, larger, have longer and better developed " ruffs," and show a moderate amount of gloss on the feathers. The oldest birds are likely those which display a pre- dominating amount of black in their feathers. They are the most glossy, and increasing lustre of feathers indicates increasing age. This is seen in many of the Crows, Ducks, Pigeons, Gallinaceous,'and other groups of birds. If comparison helps us we may say that the dark colour in the Limicolae is an indication of age. In some species — notably the Dunlin and Sanderling — the old, and often barren, birds lose much of the buff shading of their summer dress, its place being taken by a greater amount of black feathers. What exact ages these tj'pes may represent it is hard to say. The question requires further investigation, and 1 only throw out ni}^ suggestions in the hope that they may help others to lead to more definite results. ■• Mr. Bartlett noted the same thing happening many years ago in the London Zoological Gardens. (^See Darwin, " Descent of Man," p. 399). ^ The young male mentioned by Montagu in Thompson's work had a " frill " of white and chestnut. 2o6 The Irish Naturalist. [August, The rich and varied coloration of the nuptial plumage may in part be accounted for in yet another way. Headley^ points out that pigments in animals are waste products derived from the food. In the breeding season these are discharged more freely than at other times of the year, owing to increased katabolism- of the organism. This is seen by the intensi- fying of the colours of the feathers, in the spring, of such birds ivhich neither actually change coloicr or groiv 7iew feathers. Now, granting that the pugnacious Ruff is a highly-strung, excitable creature, especially in the breeding season, it may be that the katabolic changes which then take place are, perhaps of greater extent than what occur in other birds, and so with a copious discharge of waste pigment, not only rich, but even varied, colours Avould be produced. Habits of Life. — So much has been written upon this part of the subject that I do not intend to enter upon it. Many people are aware of the eccentric conduct of the Ruff during the breeding season. I have already incidentally referred to the polygamous and pugnacious habits of the males ; but a fuller and more interesting account of the combats for the females with descriptions of the battle-fields may be found in the standard works of Yarrell, Saunders, Thompson, Watters, Seebohm, &c. The observations of Cordeaux^ are well worthy of perusal. He points out a thing which should be of considerable importance to taxidermists, namel}^, that, con- sidering the length of the legs, Ruffs are by no means high standing. They bend the tibio-tarsal joint to a great extent, and carry the body horizontally. I must say that I agree with these observations, and I even noted the same attitude assumed by Ruffs in captivity. How often do we see Ruffs stuffed in an erect standing position, set up like a pouter pigeon, and looking most unnatural. I have never heard the Ruff make any noise, and this, together with the low attitude which it assumes, sometimes makes it a little difficult to identify this bird on the mud-slob, as in the distance it may be mistaken for a plover. The Ruff ^ vStructure and Life of Birds, 1S95, p. 315. 2 Constitutional changes of a destructive character. 3 The Ruff and Reeve in Lincolnshire, Zoologist. 1890 (pp. 204-209). I900.] Patten. — The Natural History of the Ruff. 207 usually flies low and rapidl)% but sometimes it ascends to a considerable height. According to Yarrell this bird formerly bred in Somerset- shire, Cambridgeshire, Huntingdon, Norfolk, and lyincoln- shire. According to Thompson there is no record of it as having bred ever in Ireland or Scotland. The Ruff has practically ceased to breed now in the British Isles. R. J. Howard' thinks they bred in Lancashire as recently as 1884. General Geographical Distribution. — The Ruff nests as high north as 75*^ N. lat., in Siberia, Scandinavia, and Russia ; and according to Saunders it breeds also in Poland^, Germany, Holland, Belgium, and N. France. When migrating it is widely distributed over Europe. It winters from the south of the Mediterranean as far as Cape Colon}', also ini^outhern and Eastern Asia. An interesting note on the nesting habits of the Ruff on the Munio River (the natural Russian-Swedish frontier) is mentioned by Sutton Davies.'^ He sa3\s — "The Ruff was very numerous in the marshes round Kaaresuando, where we obtained eggs.^ As one la}^ watching the birds in the marsh they w^ould keep passing and repassing over our heads, uttering a low^ croak." We have seen that usually the Ruff is quite silent. Food. — According to Yarrell the natural food consists of insects, their larvae and worms, mixed with fine gravel. Collet found seeds of a sea-shore plant in birds shot in autumn near Christiania. Stevenson found in the stomach small bronze wdnged beetles and earwigs."* Cordeaux^ noted Ruffs in company with young Curlew feeding on the dried dung of the Great Cotes Marshes (I^incoln- shire). He maintains that in the dry season these birds live chiefly on coleopterous insects obtained in this locality. T. E- Gunn found in the stomach remains of insects and fibrous substance, and in the gullet a caddis-worm with an entire case. ' Zoologist, 1884, p. 467, ^ Zoologist, 1895, p. 326 to 335. 3 Four constitutes the clutch. Colour of eggs is greyish buff, blotched and spotted with reddish brown (Payne Gallwey). 4 See Norgate on "The Food of Birds, " Zool.^ 1881, vol. v., 3rd series, p. 411. 5 Zoologist, 18S4, p. 446. 2oS The Irish Nalnralist. [August, In another bird he found remains of insects and seven or eight pebbles in stomach. Dr. Scharff, who ver}^ kindl}' examined the stomachs of Ruffs which I submitted to him, reports as follow\s : — " Con- stituent contents are — Gravel, largest pebble measuring 4 mm., average being 2 mm. Sand, with a great many remains of Gasteropod shells, probably marine. Bits of vegetable substance like marine algae, and very minute seeds of plants. Setae, probably of marine worms." The Gasteropod shells, detected by Dr. Scharff, confirms my idea that Ruffs feed, at any rate in part, upon Mollusca, in addition to worms, insects, and vegetable substances. The Ruff is considered a very edible bird. This we should expect on account of the mixed food it eats, and also because it is found inland and hence is not exclusively a sea-shore bird. However, judging from the immature birds, which I have myself tasted, I must candidly admit that I should prefer to eat bird flesh with a less pronounced flavour of brine and fish. Conclusion. Time and space do not permit me to enlarge further on the subject of my paper. I have laid down my remarks with a two-fold object, viz., to put together as much infor- mation as is practically knowm of the Ruff as an Irish bird. For this end I have collected together all the occurrences of this bird in our countr^^ for many j^ears back. Secondly, to try and make the subject matter of my paper readable to not onlj^ the specialist in ornithology but even to those who may be interested in general natural history work with- out any preference for a special branch of the subject. For this end I have not omitted to deal with speculative ideas and theories as a means to help us to understand how special structural modifications have been brought about correlated with the particular temperament and modes of life of the bird in question. I wish to express my best thanks to Mr. Warren, Mr. Ussher, Mr. Barrington and Mr. Williams for their kind aid and suggestions on the subject, also to Dr. Scharff and Mr. I900.] Patten. — The Naturul History of the Ruff. 209 Carpenter for so kindly allowing me to examine many skins in the collection of the Science and Art Museum. Campbei,!*, Barrett-Hamii^ton, Patten, . Warren, Payne-Gai^wey, Saunders, LiFFORD, Cordeaux, Howard, Davies, Norgate, Cordeaux, Wa INTERS, Harting, Cunningham, J. T., . Recent Literature. RufFs at Inch, Lough Swilly {^Irish Nat., voh i., P 195)- Ruff in Co. Wicklow (Jruh Nat.., vol. iv„ p. 296). Sea P'owl of Dubhn Coast (^Irish Nat., vol. viii., p. 225). {a) Ruff in Co. SHgo {Zoologist, 1884, p. 429). (J)) {Zoologist, 1896, p. 384). Letters to Young Shooters (1896, p. 439). Manual of British Birds (1899, p. 599-600). Zoologist, 1896, p. 5l\ The Ruff and Reeve in Lincolnshire {Zoologist, 1890, p. 204-209). Breeding of Ruffs in Lancashire {Zoologist, 1884, p. 467). In quest of Birds on the Munio River {Zoologist, 1895, p. 326-335). Food of Birds {Zoologist, 1881, p. 411). Zoologist, 1884, p. 446 and 466. Fauna of Outer Hebrides {Zoologist, 1896, p. 142). Ruff in Winter in Sussex {Zoologist, 1895, p. 150- 151). Sexual Dimorphism (1900, pp. 108, 154, 155). B^XPI^ANATION OF Pl,ATE 6. Map of Ireland showing counties shaded from which Ruffs have been recorded from 1821 to 1899. The horizontal shading indicates counties in which the Ruff was known previous to 1853. Only three of the maritime counties (^Louth, Meath, and Leitrim) are yet without record of the bird. Trinity College, Dublin. 210 The Irish Naturalist. [August, NOTES ON IRISH CKTACKA. BY R. I^I^OYD PATTl^RvSON, F.I,.S. The perusal of Mr. Beddard's recently published " Book of Whales " led me to re-read Dr. Scharffs article on this subject in the April number of the Iiish Naturalist \ and to endeavour to further elucidate a little-known subject I have referred to my notes, and think the following may be considered of sufficient interest to justify its insertion in the same Journal. Omitting anything that has already appeared in ni}^ book on " The Birds, etc., of Belfast I^ough," and coming to more recent years, I find in my fishing notes of 1892 to 1897, both included (I have none since) numerous references to the Cetacea. The Porpoise is of almost daily occurrence, and need not be further mentioned. Three others, namely, the common Beaked (better known as the Bottle-nosed) Whale, Hyperoodon rostratus ; the Ca'ing, or Pilot Whale, Globicephalus melas ; and the Rorqual, Balcsouoptera inuscuhis, occur, I may say, every autumn ; and I have occasionally seen all three here in one day, the first and last- mentioned generally singly the others sometimes singly, but also sometimes in small " schools " of from two or three up to four or five or so together. They can be distinguished by the different shape of the heads— the ''beak" of the first-mentioned, the blunt, rounded front of the second, and the flat topped head of the third being distinctly seen when the animals come to the surface to breathe or to attack a " ball " of fry. I have numerous and some interesting notes of them — one to the effect that I have no doubt the two larger species sometimes look round them in a leisurely manner when they come to the surface ; for I have often observed them change the direction of their course and go straight to a "play" of birds over a "ball " of fr}^ towards which their attention had been directed when on the surface, by sight or sound, or both, of the birds hovering and crying over and dipping on the fry. If they rise pretty near and to windward a strong fishy odour is very evident. 1900.] Patterson. — Notes on Irish Cdacea. 211 Besides the above, I think Sibbald's Rorqual may also occur here. I had remarked that I had never seen any of these creatures either " broaching" clear of the v/ater or " peaking the flukes," as the Sperm Whale does on going down ; but I have noted, under date 22nd June, 1S95, having sailed over to near Portpatrick, on returning, and when in about mid- channel, "a large whale ' broached' clear of the water near the boat." Unfortunately I did not see it in the air, but heard the tremendous splash it made, and saw the effects of it in spray and small waves on its returning to the water. In reply to my inquiries the boatman declared it was " three times the length of the boat and about as big as her in the body," which would have given it a length of some 102 feet and a girth of nearly 30 ! But on my declaring these dimen- sions, impossible he said, " Maybe it was not more than twice the length of the boat," which would have made it 68 to 70 feet long, below which estimate he would not come ! My own note adds, '' The splash I saw might have been 50 feet long, possibly considerably more." I have no doubt that the Killer, Orca gladiator, sometimes visits our waters. Under date 20th August, 1895, I have noted : — Saw a large Rorqual several times, then two, and a Pilot Whale, and, I believe, a Killer. I have occasionally had three large Rorquals in view at once, and considered there were five or six in the Bay at the time. These seemed to be about 30 to 40 feet long, and I have occasionally seen them fully 50 feet. The Bottle-nosed Whales were estimated at 20 to 30 feet, and the Pilot or Ca'ing Whales at 10 to 15 feet. Of late 3"ears the Rorqual is seen here more frequently than the Bottle-nosed species. An interesting note of a much rarer species is under date 8th December, 1895, w^hen " M}' nephew, Mr. Egmont Praeger, told me of a strange Cetacean having been cast ashore just beyond Rockport Quay"(z.^., between two and three miles from here), on the Co. Down shore of the bay. Accompanied by General Sir Henry Geary, K.C.B., and his son, I went to see it the following day, and examined and measured the animal. I found it to be a Bottle-nosed Dolphin, the Delphijius tursio 2T2 The Iris/i Naturalist. [August, of Bell and Southwell, the figure of the animal given by the latter author on p. 124 of his "Seals and Whales of the British Seas " being ver}^ good, except that the dorsal fin is rather too pointed. The dimensions of this very rare visitor were about as follow, strict accuracy being difficult owing to the mutilated condition of the creature when seen by me : — Length (in a strai Tail, broad. Flipper, long, Do., broad, Girth, about. ght line), 10 ft. 6 in. to 9 in. 2 ft. 2 in. T ft. o ft. 4 in. 5 to 6 ft. The attenuated beak had a gape of mouth of about 9 in., and about 3 in. more showing, but not open, inside the cheeks. The lower jaw was slightly the longest. The colour was slate above ; under jaw, breast, and remaining underparts dull white. I paid it a second visit the next day, after referring to my books and to confirm previous observations, and found nothing to add. I sent down the next day to secure the head, but it had unfortunately been removed and the body cut up. Holywood. NOTES. BOTANY. Flowers and Insects. I am much interested in Mr. C. R. Moffatt's remarks on the fertihzation of Orobam-he major and other flowers by wasps. Noticing how other visitors are kept by these insects from the flowers of Scrophularia nodosa during the day, on one occasion I watched some plants of that species at night, and found them abundantly visited by several of the common Noctuid moths. It may be doubted whether these are useful in the pollination of the flowers. I have seen them visited also by a few small Diptera, which certainly are of no service to them. W. E. Hart. Howth. 1900.] Notes. 213 ZOOLOGY. MOLLUSCS. Hydrobia Jenkins!, Smith, in South-east Ireland. On May 20th last, during an afternoon stroll, I discovered this interesting little mollusc occurring in abundance for a couple of miles along the marshy banks of the River Barrow at New Ross (Counties Wexford and Kilkenny) in company with I^iiniuza tntncatula and Stcccinea elegans. The specimens I collected are all smaller and less pointed than usual in Irish and English specimens, but otherwise seem to agree with the type, though Mr. Lionel E. Adams, who has kindly confirmed my identifi- cation of the species, states that he noticed traces of carination on one or two. R. A. Phii^IvIPS. Cork. The Food of Trout. The angler's complaint against the use of the turbine water-wheel may be just or otherwise. There are other matters that might claim his attention, viz., the food of the fish. I have conversed with many anglers, and few of them know more than that a certain artificial fly will kill Trout under favourable atmospheric conditions, and that they readily take worms during a flood. How few consider upon what the fish live during the entire year. I have examined some rivers with works and mills upon them, and have failed to find many shell-fish that are plentiful in adjoining streams not so polluted. In this connection I would point out that in the stomach of a Trout little over one pound weight, I found IQO s\i€i\s, oi LimncBa peregra, our commonest fresh-water snail, and over 130 small Pisidiiim fontinale, and P.piisilhitn. Anything that is detrimental to the creatures upon which the fish live must affect them in a cor- responding degree. Would our fishers become naturalists, not specialists, they would enhance their pleasures. H. L. Orr. Belfast. BLRDS. Spring iviigrants at Poyntzpass. As might be expected many of the birds were late in appearing this spring; the Chiffchaff was here on March 31st, but from that date till April 15th there was no further token of its presence ; the Willow Wren arrived on April 20th, the Corncrake on April 24th, the Swallow on the same date, the Cuckoo on April 28th, and I saw the first Swift on the following day. None of these birds however were present in any number till May. W. F. Johnson. Poyntzpass. 214 TJ^^^ Irish Naturalist. [August, 1900. PROCEEDINGS OF IRISH SOCIETIES. Royal Zooi^ogicaIv Socip:ty. Recent gifts include a Linnet, a Canary, and a Goldfinch from Miss Williamson, a Monkey from Mr. A. Gore, and a Kestrel from Mr. J. B- Norris Kane. 19,405 persons visited the Gardens in June. BeivFast Naturalists' Field Club. May 12. — The summer session was inaugurated by an excursion to Saintfield. The extremely wet and otherwise unfavourable character of the day tested the zeal of the members, so that the party met at Saint- field b}' the Rev. C. H. Waddell, B.D., was small, yet it included several ladies, and all Avalked direct for Creevy Lough. There is an ancient artificial island, fortified residence, or crannoge in the lake, which is still in a fair state of preservation. The Creevy Rocks above the lake are associated with the events of '98. The day was not favourable for botanical investigation, 3'et some notes were taken. The pretty Marsh Violet was in flower, and the Bog Bean was just beginning to put forth its racemes. During the hour spent in the rain b}^ the lake shore sixteen or eighteen species of shells were collected, the best being Valvata cristaia. After a steady resistance, the party were at length baffled by the severit}- of the weather, and returned in good order to the vicarage, where they found shelter and hospitality, dispensed by Mrs. and Mr. Waddell, which were thank full}' acknowledged at the formal' meeting, presided over by the vice-president, Mr. W. H, Phillips, at which also some new members were elected, and then the party returned to Belfast. Cork Naturalists' Field Club. June 4.— Excursion to Inchigeela.— The party, numbering twenty- seven, travelled by train to Macroom. From jMacroom the party took coaches and drove to Inchigeela. The following plants were observed and collected : — Ranunculus Lenorviandi, in roadside pools. AquUegia vulgaris and Linuui angustifoliiiDi, abundant in meadows. Viola ericetorutn, along the edge of lake. Ceianitcm coluinbinum, G. lucidum, and Arenaria tritiej-via, roadside. Saxifi-aga unibrosa a'ld Sedum anglictan, plentiful on rocks. Carduus nutans, found l)y ]\Ir. Johnson on rough ground near the lake. Lobelia Dorlnianna, abundant in the lake. Litliospcrinuui officinale, roadside, near Tooni Bridge. Pinguictila grandiflora, in every boggy spot. Euphorbia hibcrna, in many fields. Potainogeton lucens, Nitclla flexilis, and N, opaca, dragged in lake. Cladiuni janiaicense, Carex fulva, C. filiforinis, C. flava, C. binervis, and Schccnus nigricans, along the boggy shores of the lake. At 5 o'clock the party partook of tea at the Lake Hotel, and once more taking coach, returned towards Macroom, arriving in Cork at about 830. September, 1900.] 215 THK IRISH SPPXIKS OF I,AND PI.ANARIANS. BY R. F. SCHARPF, PH.D., M.R.I. A. Thk recent publication of Prof, von Graff's magnificent monograph on the assemblage of worms known as " Land Planarians," gives me an opportunity of reviewing this group as far as we are concerned in Ireland. Anyone who wishes to obtain additional information on the subject of these remarkable flatworms can see the original (" Monographic der Turbellarien," part ii., 1899) in the National Library of Ireland. Until recent years a few species only of land planarians had been discovered, though many marine and freshwater species were known to science. Prof, von Graff now makes known to us some hundreds of species of land planarians, of which however onl}' seven have hitherto been found in Europe. Most of the others are confined to the warm and moist tropical forests. In shape they are much flattened from above downw^ard, so that some of them are leaf- like ; others more elongated, might be described as ribbon - like, and a few are more or less cylindrical. A distinct head is never recognisable, but there is always something to mark off the anterior from the posterior end. Minute eyes are nearly alw^ays present, and sometimes the anterior end has a different shape from the posterior. The mouth is usually placed some distance back on the ventral surface. Only seven species of land planarians have been recorded as European, but I was so fortunate as to discover another in the Pyrenees last autumn, which has lately been described in the Proceedings of the Lhinean Society. Probably all the land planarians are carnivorous. Their presence need not therefore be dreaded by owners of greenhouses in which they may make their appearance. On account of their underground habits, these worms have only a very restricted range, and their natural means of dispersal must be exceed- ingly limited. To students of the geographical distribution of animals they are therefore of particular interest. Now as regards the Irish species, there are only three, one of w^hich moreover is probably introduced, viz. ; — Placocephalus {Bipaliuvi) Kewensis. 2j6 The bish NaHcralist. [September. Placocephalus kewensis (Mos.*) (Fig. I.) This species, which is better kuown uuder the name of Bipalinm kewense^ was first discovered in the greenhouses at the Botanic Gardens of Kew, near London, in 1S78. It grows to over a foot in length, though those I have seen have never exceeded 6 inches or about 15 cm. The anterior end is a semicircular flat disc much like the shape of a cheese- cutter, while the body is narrower and ver)^ elongated. The colour is somewhat variable, but as a rule it is greyish above with five darker longitudinal stripes, and lighter underneath. Since its original discover)^ it has been taken according to von Graff, in several conservatories in Kngland and Germany. It has also been found in Madeira, at the Cape, in North America. Brazil, Hong Kong, Samoa Islands, Australia, and New Zealand. It has been first found in Ireland bj' Major Barton in his greenhouse at Straffan, Co. Kildare {Irish Nat., vol. iii., p. 242). More recently Mr. Moore took it in the Glasnevin Botanic Gardens near Dublin {Irish Nat.y vol. iv., p. 165), and he has since forwarded specimens from there to the Museum from time to time. Prof, von Graff (p. 272) inclines to the belief that the Oriental Region is the original home of P. kewensis, and that it has thence been introduced by human agency to other parts of the world. He also refers the centre of origin of the Bipaliidae, p. 272)— the family to which this species belongs — to the Indo-malayau sub-region, five-.sixth of the known vSpecies being confined to the Oriental Region. Rhynchodemus tcrrestris (Miill.) (Fig. 2.) This was the first land Plauarian ever discovered, though by its original describer, O. F. Midler, it was taken for a slug. This is however not surprising, as even to the present day many who see it for the first time would certainly classify it among the Mollusca. It is about an inch long, the anterior and posterior ends being cylindrical, the middle part slightly compressed. Above it is dark gre}', underneath light grey, and during its progress it leaves a track of slime behind precisely like a slug. It probably feeds upon snails — at an}' rate I once found a specimen in Switzerland half immersed in the shell of a Hyalinia. I first observed it in Ireland in 1S94, when the late Miss Kelsall brought me a specimen from Blackrock, Co. Dublin (vide N'ature^ vol. 1., p. 617). Since that 3'ear I have taken it near Carlow, at Woodford and Clonbrock, Co. Galway, at Kenmare and Parknasilla, Co. Kerry, at Mallow, Co. Cork, near Dundalk, Co. Louth, and at Tempo. Co. Fermanagh, while Mr. Halbert took a specimen at Brittas Bay, Co. Wicklow, and another at Leenane, Co. Galway, for the Royal Irish Academy Fauna and Flora Committee. The little worm prefers damp and shady places, and generally shelters under stones or rotten wood. In England it seems widely distributed. It was first taken by the Rev. L. Jenyns, near Cambridge. Additional localities are given by Sir John I900.] SCHARFF. — Irish Land Planarians. 217 Lubbock, and more recently Mr. Gamble recorded it as far north as Westmoreland. I took it myself near Coniston in Cumberland, but so far as I know it has never been met with in Scotland. Abroad it has been taken in Denmark, Germany, Holland, Austria, France, Switzerland, and the Balearic Isles. Fig. 2. Fig. 3- Fig. I. Placocephalus Kewensis ; Fig. 2. Rhynchodetnus terrestris ; Fig. 3. R. Scharffi. Natural size. Rhynchodemus Scharffi, v. Graff. (Fig- 3-) The third Irish species, like the last, was first discovered by the late Miss Kelsall in her garden at Blackrock, Co. Dublin. She handed it to me, saying that she found a sickly-looking worm, which description quite agrees with its yellowish flesh-colour and flabby condition. I recognised it as a new species, but knowing that Prof. v. Graff was then working at his great monograph, I forwarded the specimen to him. A lull description of its external and internal anatomy with figures now appears in the work referred to. The largest of the specimens I have seen measured about 2\ inches (65 mill.), in length, and about |th inch (3 mill.) in width. The lower surface is somewhat lighter than the upper, and, like the last species, it has two small eyes near the anterior end. Rhynchodemus Scharffi is closely allied to R. terrestris and also to R. pyrenaicusy but differs from them both in several important structural points. Its size and colour distinguish it at once from R. terrestris 2i8 The Irish Naturalist. [September, Prof. V. GraflF agrees with me that this species must be considered as one of the endemic European forms, and it seems to me highly probable that it is indigenous in Ireland. It has recently been discovered in a second locality in Ireland by Mr. F. W. Moore at the Glasneviu Botanic Gardens near Dublin. The fact of the occurrence of this worm in both instances in an artificially heated structure does not necessarily favour the view of its introduction from abroad. All land planarians thrive best in a warm damp climate, and while they generally remain hidden under stones or clods of earth so as to avoid the sun's rays and drying winds, whenever they accidentally find their way into greenhouses, they meet there with conditions congenial to their nature without having to seek shelter. They are thus more easily noticed by us. I think R. Schar§i has been introduced into both the localities where it has yet been found, but it seems to mc probable that it has come with the turf or perhaps with Sphagnum moss which are so largely imported from the countr5\ It is to be hoped that this short note will induce naturalists in various parts of Ireland to pay partictilar attention to this group of worms, as it is not unlikely that other species may still be discovered. Science and Art Museum, Dublin. BOTANICAL NOTES FROM NORTH IRELAND. BY J. H. DA VIES. The chief purpose of the following is to place on record an additional station for Epilobium rosewn and another for Poa co7npressay two plants to which I have lately been led to give some attention. Though denied a right to native citizenship, it is gratifying to know that they are not outcasts from the Irish list. Withoitt wishing it to be thought that I have formed a fixed conviction on this question, I may say I still cling to the opinion that the considerations in favour of the unqualified admission of both species are hardly outweighed by any that I conceive can be urged against. Our knowledge of the range of these plants in Ireland I think is not yet complete. Lepldlum campestre, R. Br. — In extraordinary profusion on rocky ground (car])oniferous limestone) on the County Armagh .side of the River Blackwater at Benburb. I900.] Daviks. — Botanical Notes from North Ireland. 219 EplIoDium roseum, J^inu.— In July last 1 gathered examples of this Epilobe on a wall and iu damp copses in the demesne at Lurgan, Co. Armagh. Although recorded in the Cybch for only Districts V. and XII., the editors are doubtless right iu noting the plant as questionably rare. Its superficial similarity to E. montanum is so very close that it may most easily be passed over. Cnicus arvensis, Hoffm., var. setosus (Bess.)— In some plenty in waste ground by a roadside at Lambeg, Co. Down. When seen growing there is a conspicuous difference between the variety and the type. To my mind Sir J. D. Hooker would seem to be quite justified in placing the plant as a sub-species. It is given in Cyb, HUk for District XI. only. Mr. vStewart gives me a note stating that this plant was found by Miss Knowles and himself iu a disused gravel-pit by the road from Kilrea to Garvagh, Co. Derry, July, 1898. Scrophularia aquatica, Linn, — Though locally rare in Ireland it appears to have a wide range, and has been recorded from all the botanical districts, with the exception of District X. The blank is now filled through the occurrence of the species, in some plenty, by the margin of the lake in the demesne at Lurgan, Co. Armagh, where it has been observed, independently, by INlr. Richard Hanna and myself. At the same place there is abundance of Elcocharis ackularu> F*oIy&onuin minus, Huds. — In August, T met with this species, for which Cybelc gives no Co. Antrim locality, in quantit}- on a gravell}- part of Lough Neagh shore, about half-mile west of the Sixmile- water. The station at Whitehouse, given in F/ora of Ulster and accepted in Flora N.E, Ireland, may, after all, have been right. Potamogeton Zizil, Roth. — Occurs in a watercourse between the canal and the River Blackwater at Benburb, and also in the Callan Water, Co. Armagh. Eleocharis uniglumis, Link. — Mr. Stewart's only station for this plant in the North- east (near Bangor, Co. Down, 1867) has been lost through building. It has, however, been found to occur on the muddy sea-shore at Groomsport, where I met with it in July last, in considerable quantity. The only other north-eastern locality is Killougli, iu the same county. Carex paludosa, Good. — Being one of the rarest of our north-eastern sedges, not recently seen in District XII., it may be worthy of note that it has lately been found in marshy places along the greater part of the County Down shore of Lough Neagh. At the same time I saw it also, but in lesser quantity^ on the County Armagh shore of the Lough, near the junction of the two counties. F>oa compressa, Linn. — On a wall by the roadside at Ballyvorally, about midway between Glenavy and Lough Neagh, Co. Antrim, The grass was found here on the excursion of the Belfast Field Naturalists' Club, 4th August. Some time ago the prediction was hazarded that it would prove to be more widely diffused than was then known, and it will most likely be heard of from still other places. Lisburui 220 The Irish Naturalist. [September, A VISIT TO LOUGH ERNE IN SEARCH OF THE SANDWICH TERN. BY ROBERT WARREN. My friend, Mr. R. J. Ussher, having heard from Mr. C. Langham, of Tempo Manor, that he had received from I^ough Erne four 3'onng Sandwich Terns for his collection of live birds, requested me to visit Lough Erne and verify the dis- covery, as he was anxious to be certain of the terns breeding there, because up to that time only one breeding-haunt in Ireland was known to us, that of Rathroueen Lough near Ballina, Co. Mayo. However, from Mr. Langham's description of the birds, and his acquaintance with the species, from previousl}- having shot specimens in Donegal Ba}-, I had no doubt of his correctlj^ naming the birds sent him. Intending to make Enniskillen ni}- headquarters for ex- ploring the lake, I left Ballina on the 9th July by the 1.45 limited mail train, and on reaching Claremorris Station, changed into the Waterford and Limerick train for Ball}"- sodare, hoping to meet at that vStation the Sligo and Leitrim train for Enniskillen but, unfortunately, just as otir train was nearingtlie station, the one for Enniskillen was steaming out. So I had to go on to Sligo for the night. I left next morning by 6 a.m. train for Enniskillen, arriving there at 8.30, and after breakfast left by the Dundalk 9.30 train for Lisbellaw, where Mr. Langham very kindl)^ had a car waiting to take me on to Tempo Manor, which. I reached after a pleasant drive of five miles through a prett}' and thriving-looking district. Tempo Manor is the ideal home of a naturalist, a picturesque, handsome residence in a fine demesne, planted with fine old timber, with a beautiful little lake surrounded by trees and shrubs at the foot of the lawn. The lake is well-stocked with wild fowl of various kinds : Grej^-lag, Bean, Whitefronted, Barnicle, Canada, and Eg3'ptian Geese, while the ducks are well represented by Sheldrakes, Wild Ducks, Wigeon, Teal, Gargarry, Shovellers, Tufted Ducks, and American Summer Ducks. Lesser Blackbacked Gulls, Herring, and Blackheaded Gulls were in a separate enclosure from the ducks, along with a pair of Green Cormorants. I900.] Warrkn. — A Visit to Lough Erne. 221 In a large aviary close to the lake were four healthy young Sandwich Terns, a Grey Plover, and some young Blackheaded Gulls, as companions for the Terns, while in a part of a little shrubbery, enclosed by an iron netting, but uncovered, near the lake, lived two pairs of the New Zealand Weka Rails, so tame and domesticated that they reared several young birds, some of which I saw were as large as their parents, and equall}^ tame. The upper part of the lawn was tenanted by White Storks, and a remarkabh* handsome specimen of the Crowned CranC; while Silver Pheasants ran about the grass near another large aviary, containing a pair of Ravens, Grey Crows, and specimens of the Tawny, I,ong-eared, Barn, and Short-eared Owls, and an Australian Piping Crow. Altogether, it was the most interesting private collection of living birds that I ever saw, and all looking so healthy as to do the greatest credit to their management. In a room used as a museum, Mr. L^angham has a fine collection of native birds, nicely arranged in a large central case, and a number of smaller ones round the room. Among the birds I noticed a fine specimen of the Iceland Gull in that very white phase of plumage common to both Glaucous and Iceland Gulls in the last season before assuming the perfect plumage of the adult. This specimen was the whitest I ever saw, not a trace of the pale grey mantle on back or shoulders, but this extreme whiteness of colour was probabl}^ owing to the lateness of the date when the bird was obtained, Mr. Langliam having found the bird dead on the MuUaghmore sands on the 5th June, 1896. After passing a very pleasant day I returned to Enniskillen, intending next morning to go out on the lake in search of the Sandwich Terns' breeding haunt. When passing Lough Eyes, a small lake on the roadside between Tempo and Eisbellaw, I observed a young Great Crested Grebe swimming near a little island; it appeared full- grown and well able to fly across the lake, and on mentioning the fact to Mr. lyangham, he told me that two pairs of Grebes bred on that small sheet of water. Next morning I went out on I^ough Erne, and visiting the terns' breeding-haunt, found 222 The Irish Naturalist. [September, about twenty pairs of old birds flying about the island, but the}^ had apparently all hatched out their young, which had either fled out on the lake with the j^oung Blackheaded Gulls, or concealed themselves among the weeds growing in dense thickets about the island. I found onl}^ one 3^oung bird a day or two old, two fresh eggs, and three addled ones. The 3'oung bird being required to finish a nest-case in the Dublin Museum, I killed it, and to ni}' surprise when dying it dis- gorged parts of a sand-eel, the vivid green of the back and the silvery white colour of the under parts showing that it was unmistakably a sand-eel brought from the sea, a distance of at least fifteen miles, a long way for any bird to bring food for its 3^oung. No doubt the Sandwich Terns may, like the common species, feed their young with fish from the lake, but I never saw any of them make the least attempt to fish while I was on the lake, although there were numbers of Common Terns fishing all round at the time. Among the breeding birds of the lake the Blackheaded Gulls appear to be the most numerous ; there is a colony of Lesser Blackbacked Gulls on an island far down the lough, while the Common Terns breed on various islands. The Tufted Duck is one of the commonest ducks breeding on the islands. We found two nests amidst the long reeds' on the tern island ; on one the duck was hatching five eggs, but the other was a deserted nest, containing three dead birds and five eggs. On another small island, frequented by Common Terns, we found a third duck's nest with four newly- hatched 3'oung, and five eggs chipped ; one 3'oung bird was so strong that it scrambled out of the nest and swam out on the lake like an old bird ; afourthnest we found on another tern island, the female sitting so close on seven eggs that I almost trod on her before she rose from the nest. These nests all found without an3' special search being made show how common the Tufted Duck is on the lake, and when returning up the lake to Knniskillen we passed several broods swimming after their mothers, one with ten or twelve, another w4th seven, and a third with four little birds, all apparently the same size, and onl3' two or three days old, which shows what late breeders these ducks are, even later than the Mergansers. 1900.] Warren. — A Visit to Lough Erne. 2 23 Tame vSwans are very common about the lake, nearlj^ every little sheltered ba}" being tenanted by a pair and their young broods, five to six being the average number of cygnets I observed with each, but one pair I thought had seven. The many finel3--wooded islands scattered about Lough Erne add greatly to the beaut}' of its scenery, but are ver}- disappointing to the ornithologist. The dearth of bird-life in some of these old oak woods is remarkable, for where j'ou would expect to hear the cheerful notes of the Chiffchaff or those of the rarer Wood Warbler, the silence of death reigns all round, with nothing to break it. I walked through one of these old oak woods for a long time, and the only appearance of bird-life that I saw was a solitary Woodcock rising out of the thickest part, and the only sound I heard was the flap of his wings. In the evening, after returning to Enniskillen, I walked out to Castlecoole, Lord Belmore's beautiful place, to see the celebrated flock of Gre^'-lag Geese kept on the lake in the demesne there for over 160 years. According to William Thompson these geese had been brought there by Colonel Corry (ancestor of the present Lord Belmore), about 120 years before 1848. They are the true Grey-lag, and live nearly altogether on the lake in a half wild state. While looking at them swimming slowly about I counted twenty-three old birds, but saw no young ones, w^hich probabl}' were kept out of sight among the long reeds that fringed the lake. The flock, I was informed b}'- one of the workmen, numbers about fort}', and they would be more numerous only for the large number of goslings destroyed b}^ the pike. This small lake is also a favourite breeding-haunt of the Great Crested Grebe, and while looking at the geese I observed eight grebes (old and young) on the water. I was informed that on most of the lakes in Fermanaorh the Great Crested Grebe breeds, wherever the}- are of any size. Lough Eyes, already mentioned; although but a small sheet of water, having two pair. Moyview, Balliua. A3 224 The Irish N'aturalist. [vSeptember, ROUND LOUGH CONN. BY R. LLOYD PRAEGER, B.E. It miglit, perhaps, have been more in keeping with the times to have headed this narrative " How I climbed Nephin," especial!}' in view of the fact that the ascent of this mountain was absolutely devoid of incident ; but Lough Conn will be found to represent the centre of interest in the ramble described in the following pages, and may well stand sponsor for the whole. The necessity of filling up many gaps in the floras of West and East Mayo took me to that part of Ireland in the last week of Juh% and Ballina made a convenient and com- fortable head-quarters, where salmon formed the staple article of diet. The main features of the surrounding district will be seen by a glance at a map. The river Moy flows northward through the town. Below Ballina it is tidal, and widens into an estuar}^ which in turn gives place to the broad waters of Killala Ba}'. At Ballina the river descends a series of lime- stone ledges like a flight of stairs, and for many miles above this fall it is deep and slow, flowing through great flat bogs. The Moy at Ballina separates West Maj'o from Sligo, but a few miles southward Sligo gives wa}' to East Ma3'o. All around Ballina the Carboniferous limestone prevails, but on either hand lie great areas of mountainous metamorphic countr}'. Lough Conn, eight miles long bv about three miles wide and (what is practically its continuation) Lough Cullen (three by two miles) lie on the edge of the limestone, west of the Mo}^ ; and close to the lake-shore the huge quartzite mass of Nephin (2,646 feet) towers imposingl}', and forms the dominating feature of the district. The botan}^ of this area is not too well known. A. G. More stayed at Foxford, on the Moy nine miles above Ballina, for several months in the summer of 1864, and what we know of the botan}' of Lough Conn is due to him. Dr. Dickie visited Nephin, and in the Introduction to " Flora of Ulster" (1S64) gives a list of its plants in descending order. Mr. Hart, in his exploration of the Ma5'0 and Galway mountains, also ascended the mountain, and has published a good account of its scanty flora.^ This appears to complete the enumeration of the explorers of the Lough Conn region. ■• Report on the Flora of the Mountains of Mayo and Galway, Proc. K.I. A., 2 (Science) iii., pp. 702-4. 1883. 1900.] Praegek. — Round Lough Coim, 225 I arrived in Ballina late on the afternoon of Jnly 26th, for, in spite of *' acceleration," the journe}^ from Dublin still occupies seven hours. The daylight remaining was devoted to listing plants in the neighbourhood, on the Mayo side of the river. The first plant my eye fell on was that irrepressible alien, Matricaria discoidca, which is abundant about the town. The Moy yielded little. In marsh}- ground were Epipadis palusfris in full ^ower, /it? lais obiusijiorus, Pinguicula lusitanica^ Spa7-ga7iiuin miniuium. Coming home along the raihva}' Linaria viscida appeared with Matricaria Chamomilla and Fcstuca rigida, and what was more interesting, a good colony of the rare Poa coniprcssa. I watched for this grass on old walls, and other places less open to suspicion, but did not see it again, and to this station a t or | must be appended. This last, with Linaria viscida and Pctasites fragrans, constitute additions to the flora of District VIII. of " Cybele Hibernica." Next morning I took train to Killala, situated on the sea near the mouth of the Mo}', and first explored an extensive stretch of sand-dunes that lie three miles north of the village. Like all the western dunes, the flora was amazingh^ scanty. On the shore, not even S a/sola or Cakilc brightened the bare sand ; and the onh^ arenicole plants on the dunes were Psamvia^ Viola Ctutisii, and Cci'astitun tctrandrzim. A relieving feature was furnished by the great abundance of Gentiana Amarclla in full bloom, interspersed with the white stars of Sagina nodosa. Refreshed by a swim, I returned along the shore, adding considerabl}' to the Mayo salt-marsh list. Killala consists of a round tower and man}^ public-houses. In one of these I had lunch, in company with an aged lad}' fiddler, and to her unmitigated blessings, ^ when I offered to pay her modest reckoning, the best find of the day, which was made immediately after, must naturally be attributed — nameh', the alpine Draba incana, growing on sand-dunes half a mile east of Killala, unknown hitherto in County Mayo. Killala yielded ^ This goorl lady's speech is realh' worthy of preservation : — •'F'aith, an' I didn't know, acushla, what the divil I was to say to Mrs. Casey, for sorra a pinny I had an me barrin' three-ha'pence, an' the half of that owed alread}' ; but the Lord has sint a holy man from the dear knows where with a tin drum on his broad back [the reference is to my vasculum], who has relieved me of all ni}- dishtress; and ma}- all the blissius," &c., &c., &c. 226 ' The Irish N^afuralist. [September, also three additions to the flora of District VIII. — Sisymbrium Alliaria, Chcnopodiiim Bonus-Hcnricjis, and Carcx riparia. Thence I followed the shore eastward, with the sand-dunes of Bartragh Island cutting off the open sea, to the beautiful ruins of Moj'ue Abbey, where Iinila Hclcniitm and Fctivselinum satizmm still tell of the Franciscan kitchen-garden. Then up the Moy estuar}-, past Rosserk Abbey, and inland to Rathroeen Lough, where a good haul of bog and water plants was obtained, including Potamogdoyi obtnsifoliiis, new to VIII., Carcx limosa, &c. A few^ miles by road brought me to Ballina. Next morning I started w^estward, and first halted at Deel Castle. The woods there added some plants to m}^ list, including Epipadis lafifolia, new to VIII., and Viola odorata, also new to VIII., but to be marked here with at. I struck the Lough Conn shore at the mouth of the Deel River. The characteristic flora of Lough Conn turned up at once — Sanguisorba officinalis, first found here by Mr. More, one of the most local of Irish plants, its other stations being all in the North-east (District XII.) I may say at once that I found it right round the lake, but never more than a hundred 3'ards from the water's edge ; it is more abundant on the eastern than on the western side, and becomes rare on the southern shores, where the limestone is replaced b}' gneiss and granite. With the Potcrium were Thalictrtim coUnuini and Galium borealc, w^hich also occurred right round the lake ; Plantago Diaritima, abundant over this whole district ; Lithospermum officinale \n quantity; Riibns saxalilis, Sic. The shores of Lough Conn on this side are exceedingly ston}', and the characteristic scene on the lake-shore consists of a slope like a badh' macadamized road ga}^ with the flowers of the Potcrium, Thalicti'um. and Plantago aforesaid set among sheets of Wild Thyme — a combination to be seen nowhere else in Ireland. My boots were beginning to complain of the knife- like edges of the stones wdien I reached a patch of bog on the shore opposite Annagh Island, and when crossing it what was my delight to see the erect bushes of Erica nicditcrranea growing among the commoner heaths. There was not much of it here — only a half dozen plants were counted — but six were as good as six hundred. The known range of this, one of the most interesting of our Cantabrian plants, was well defined, I900.] Prakger. — Ro2ind Loicgh Com. 227 stretching along the coast of the wild metamorphic country from Roundstone to Broad Haven ; here it was far to the eastward of its most easterlj^ station, and on the low-lying inland limestone. At Cloghans I left the lake-shore for a while, and visited Derrymannin I^ake, which proved barren, and I returned to Lough Conn at its south-eastern end. Here the limestone ceases, and a bolder shore-line is formed by gneissose rocks. Heathery bluffs project over the lake, alternating with lovely bays of clean reddish sand. A bathe was the natural result of the advent of deep water, and then the change of the flora was noted which followed the change of soil. A new group of plants appeared, among which were Radiola, Filago ger7ua7iica, Hypericum clodes, Gnaphalhmi sylvatiainiy and all the commoner calcifuge members of our flora. Lough Conn is separated from Lough Cull en by a wild, picturesque rocky neck of land, and over this I passed to the beautifully situated little inn at Pontoon. An evening stroll along the Lough Cullen shores revealed nothing new except Scutellaria nmior and a couple of Charas. On four out of the five days which I spent in Mayo, the weather showed a commendable habit of raining smartly for an hour in the morning, to freshen things up, and then clearing to a glorious day. The morning I left Pontoon was no exception. A steep pass between wooded hills led to the Lough Conn shore in its south-western corner, where Poferiujn, TJialictriwi, and the rest were waiting to welcome me. A rocky bluff yielded Taxus and Populus trcumla, evidently native, and a couple of Hawkweeds not yet named. Further on, another Hawkweed of the accipitrine group was gathered, and Lobelia Dortmanna in the lake ; also Sclcranthiis and other additions to the calcifuge group. Striking inland at Wood Park, Levally Lough was visited, and a great bog whereon Rhynchospora fiisca was the most interesting plant. Then I turned towards where Nephin towered into the clouds on the north-west. One of the few explorers of Nephin invites his readers to " start from the summit and descend downwards in various directions." I found it possible only to ascend upwards in one — the one I chose being the course of a streamlet on the south-east side. The ascent is steep and the mountain very bare. For a long time Saxifraga lunbrosa 228 The Irish Naturalist. [September, is the ouly interesting plant, but towards the summit large areas of stony slope are covered with this and Arrneria inaritima. The clouds cleared away as the top was reached, and I enjoyed a glorious view, extending from Slieve lycague and Ben Bulben to Longford, lyOUghrea, and Achill. Carcx rigida and Salix herbacca were on the summit. On the north side of the mountain is a gigantic cirque, into which I descended, seeing Saxifraga stcllaris, and at least a thousand feet below the summit l^acciniuvi Vitis-idcea, found b}' Dickie but not by Hart. From the base of Nephin I returned to the Lough Conn shore at Castlehill. North of this, a con- siderable ])eninsula projects into the lake. Its neck is boggy, and the bog extends northward towards Inishcoe House. I was stumbling along here through heathery tussocks, when to m}'- delight I came on Erica 7ncditcrranea again. This time it was in abundance, its erect-growing round bushes rising on all sides among the low scrub of ilJyrica and Schcemis that fringed the lake, and though of course out of blossom (save a few tiny sprays) it was a sight to gladden the heart of a botanist. The heat and flies were both forgotten, and in great good humour I crossed the woods of Inishcoe and rejoined the lake shore. Here Agrirnonia odorata put in an appearance, growing in quantity under the sheltering fringe of bushes that marked storm-level, and it continued abundant right up to Gortnaraby (now figuring as Gortnor Abbey !) where I swam for some pond-weeds. Salix alba, unrecorded for VIII., looked as native here as it usually does — which is not saying much. It was late w^hen I reached Crossmolina, and a pleasant, evening drive brought me back to Baliina. The anticline which runs across northern Sligo and forms the bleak bog-covered range of the Ox Mountains continues into Mayo as a dark forbidding ridge of i,ooo feet or more in height, which terminates at Foxford on the Moy. My previous work in East Mayo having been mainly un the limestone, this ground was chosen for the next day's work. An early train was taken to Foxford, where Matricaria discoidca turned up as usual. Crossing the Moy, I passed fn^m West to Kast Ma\(), and from District VIII. to IX. Pa paver soimiifenwi, apparenth' naturalized about here, is unrecorded for IX. Crossing a group of rocky hills, Callow Lough was visited and I turned northward along the edge of the high ground. igoo.] Praegkr. — Romid Lough Conn. 229 There are great mounds of gravel here, which contain enough limestone to harbour Carlina, From Ballina and Nephin I had noticed a rather bold clifif in among the hills, and a circuitous mountain road brought me to where it looks down on the sequestered vallej^ and peat)' lakes of Glendaduff. Unaware at the time that Mr. More had recorded Saxifraga nmbrosa from "hills north-east of Foxford " — probabl}' this identical station, its onl}^ habitat in District IX. — I had set my heart on finding the London Pride here, and sure enough here it was, growing abundantl)' from top to bottom of the cliff and talus. This spot is within a couple of miles of the Sligo boundary, and as the hills increase in height to the eastward, it appears not unreasonable to hope that this gem of the Irish flora may yet be added to the list of Sligo plants, despite Mr. Colgan's negative results {LN., v., 301). Be it noted that Mr. Colgan's explorations did not extend to the Mayo end of the Ox Mountains. Thence northward to Bally more Lake, where Lobelia Dortvianna and Nymphcca alba vied with each other in decorating the boggy margins. This was good ground, and I added materially to the East Mayo list. Antheinis nobilis and Viola tricolor were new to the flora of District IX. Lough Doo and Carrowkeribly Lake, which adjoin, proved com- paratively a failure, and as the sun went down I headed northward for Ballina through the endless bogs of the Moy valley, the featureless road being enlivened by the crowd of men, women, and donkeys — ridden, driven, or panniered — which were returning from the fair. On my last day I had intended working across the flat bog- covered limestone country from Ballyhaunis to Swineford, but heavy rain set in when I was but a few miles from the former place, and after sheltering behind a wall on a bleak grassy ridge (houses and trees were almost non-existent) for tv/o hours, I had to beat a retreat to Ballyhaunis, and thence to Claremorris. The rain over, a profitable afternoon was spent in wooded countr}' south of the latter place, and a number of woodland plants added to the flora, of which the best was Milium cffnsiim. Claremorris was reached as darkness fell, and next morning I said aii fevoir to Mayo. 230 The Irish Naturalist . [vSeptember, PROCKEDINGS OF IRISH SOCIKTIKS. ROYAI, ZooT^oaiCAi, SOCIKTV. Recent gifts include a Corn-crake from Mr. G. V. I^ovell, a Sparrow- hawk from Mr. A. B. Leeper, a pair of Kingfishers from Mr. R. Edwards, a Puffin from Mr. R. Kennedy, a Cockatoo from Miss O'Donnel, and a Sanderling from Dr. C. J. Patten. A Bactrian Camel, a White-tailed Gnu, a Python, and four INIonkeys have been bought, 17,042 persons visited the Gardens in July. Bei^fast Natur.\i,ists' F1EI.D Cl^UB. August 4. Gi,Kna\'Y and IvOUGH Neagh. —A large party left Belfast, and w^ere joined by members from Lisburn and Antrim. Deviating from the county road, the party entered Glenconwa}', and for some distance traced the banks of Glenavy River. Here the photographers made some records, and the entomologist some captures, while the botanists were by no means idle. The eastern margin of Lough Neagh, wuth its sandy borders, possesses a varied and very interesting land flora. The lake-shore yielded the Yellow Loosestrife, Lysi/nac/u'a vii/i;aris^ one of the rarer pond- weeds (/'^/rt///^^t/t7;^ //6V6V-^//^j////i), and the Cow-wheat, Mchinipynim pratensc. An otherwise unattractive roadside wall furnished the best plant of the day. This was Poa comprcssa, a species which until recently was only recorded for two stations in the North of Ireland, as it is not a conspicuous plant; it has probably been overlooked, and may ])OSsibly be found elsewhere. The well-known fossil w ood or '' petrified wood " of Lough Neagh was collected along the shore near Sandy Bay. Good cabinel specimens were selected, which illustrated stages in the process of silicification, one part being soft lignite and part solid stone. Solid blocks of ferruginous clay or ironstone were also obtained, which, when split open, were found to contain beautiful inij^ressions of leaves, Similar plant-remains occur in the iron-ore beds of lUdlypalady, Glenarni; and elsew here in Co. Antrim. BKI^EAST and DU Jil^IN NaTURAUvSTS* PlEl.1) ClyUBS. J LiyV 1 1-J3. Joint K^xcuksiox to Navan and the Bovne VaIvI^ev.— The parties from Belfast and Dublin, numbering altogether 36, met at Drogheda on the morning of the nth, and took train to Beauparc, a few ])roceeding to Navan direct. By kind permission of Mr. Lambert, the members passed through the demesne of Beauparc, and across the Boyne, where the fine foldings of the Carboniferous limestone were photographed, and some good plants collected, including Poa palustris, 1900. J Proceedings of Irish Societies. 231 which has here its only Irish station. Thence the tow-path was followed for six miles to Navau. The botany of the river banks was interesting. The best find was Acorns Calamus, and among the other plants collected were Thalictruni Jlavm/i , Ranunculus Lingua^ Stellariapalusiris, Rosa rubiginosa (common), Cala/ninfha officinalis, Hydi-ocharis l\Iorsus-rana:, Carex acuta. Mr. Welch photographed a magnificent clnmp of Alisma Plantago, The weather on the whole was too dr}' for collecting moUnsca, but a shower brought np, on the Iris by the riverside, ver}' large Succinea puh-is, some of which had very deep, rich colouring. Later in the evening a new Irish station was found for the very rare and local Helix hortensis, which swarmed all over the gravestones in Ardbraccan churchyard. Planorbis Jonianus of a rather large size was found in small pools close to the Boyne, while Vahafa crista fa, so local in the north-east, was common ever)-- where. In the evening the local objects of interest were visited, includ- ing Mr. Fitzherbert's salmon hatcher}^ and Donaghmore round tower. Next morning train was taken to Oldcastle, whence the party drove eastward and thoroughly explored Slieve-na-calliagh and its interesting prehistoric burial 'chambers. Cystoplcris fragilis was gathered on one of the earns, and a number of calcifuge plants noted. The drive was resumed to Kells, where dinner was waiting. The evening was devoted to inspecting the many antiquities of this interesting town, and a late moonlight drive brought the party back to Navan. In Kells churchyard Helix hortensis was again plentiful, more so than H. nemoralis, which swarmed in the other damp localities visited. On the third day cars were taken to Trim. The enormous bushes of Rosa arvensis in full bloom in the roadside hedges excited much admiration. Rain commenced to fall at Trim, but did not prevent full justice being done to the fine old castle, the " yellow steeple " (near which the snails Helix virgata and H. acuta abounded) and other famous remains of this historic town. The Rev. Canon Norman, who was with the part}^ stated that he never knew Helix acuta to occur inland in England. In Ireland it rarely does so, and only on the central limestone plain. In the evening the Belfast members left for the north, followed a couple of hours later by the Dublin contingent. Myriads of the " Meadow Brown " butterfly {Epinephile janira) were observed rising from the bramble-bushes in the overgrown hedges ])etween Slane and Newgrange in an extension trip made by some of the members. Fifty or more would rise as the car passed from an area only 5 to 10 feet square, and this abundance of the species was noticed for miles along the narrow roads near Newgrange and Dublin. 232 The Irish Naturalist. [September, NOTES BOTANY, PHANEROGAMS. IVIatrlcarta discoldea In Ireland. In the course of an excursion to New Grange and Monasterboice, made on the 28th June last, I came across this aggressive alien in several stations both in Louth and Meath, in neither of which counties does it appear to have been observed previously. It was noticed for the first time that day about a mile beyond Drogheda by the side of the road leading to Oldbridge, and a couple of miles farther on, at Oidbridge itself, appeared again in a deserted quarry close by the Boyne monument. Both of these stations are in county Louth. Passing into county Meath just beyond Oldbridge, the plant again turned up on the roadside near Dowth and re-appeared in considerable quantity between Dowth and New Grange. Soon after leaving New Grange for Mellifont and INIonasterboice, the plant made its fifth and last appearance for the day, this time at Rossan, where it occurred in great profusion, covering the roadsides with a characteristic carpet of greenish yellow. So far the plant has been observed in the following nine Irish counties: — Dublin, Louth, Meath, Westmeath, King's Co., Roscommon, Galway, Mayo, and Sligo, its area of distribution forming a broad band stretching right across Central Ireland. Records from Northern and Southern Ireland are still wanting. Appearances all point to its independent introduction into numerous localities, from none of which the plant has yet had time to spread very widely. Further observation will no doubt show that the isolated centres of distribution in which it has alread}^ made a lodgment are much more numerous than would appear from existing records. Dublin. • NaThaniei, Coi^GAN. To Mr. Colgan's Meath station I can add three others — Navan, Drumree. and Hill of Down. To his list of counties three others may be added — Monaghan, where it was recently observed by Mr. A. Somerville, and Longford and Cavan, where I noted it this season. It will be seen that the invasion of Ulster by this enterprising alien is now fairly begun. R. Lt [September, 1900. TWO NEW TEXT BOOKS. Text-book of Zoology treated from a Bioloi^ical vStandpoint. By Dr. Otto Schmr i Iv. Translated from the German by Rudolf Rosenstock, M.A. Edited by J. T. Cunningham, M.A. Part i. Mammals. With numerous illustrations. London : A. and C. Black, 1900. Pp. viii. and 13S. Price 3^-. M. The special feature of this useful volume is that it "treats animals always as living organisms." To quote Mr. Cunningham's preface "Zoology from this point of view attracts children almost without exception, while for them the subject has but little interest from any other point of view." Consequently the author's plan has been to take one or more t^'pical mammals of each order and describe these in some detail, laying particular stress on the relation between their structure and their manner of life. The systematic part of the volume is unfor- tunately disfigured by several errors, such as the inclusion of the Chimpanzee and Orang in the same genus. The book is marked " for the use of schools and colleges." For purely elementary work, we fanc}' that it will be more used by teachers than by their pupils, as there are many hints, directions, and unanswered questions which are clearly addressed to the former, while the diagnoses of the phylum, class and order are among the facts of zoolog}' that have " but little interest " for the latter. An intelligent teacher will find the book full of invaluable hints, and we congratulate the class of boys or girls who learn zoology from actual specimens on the lines here laid down. First Stage Botany as illustrated by Flowering Plants. For the Elementary vStage of the Science and Art Department. By Ai^FRED J. EavarT, D.Sc. Pp. viii. and 252. London : W. B. Clive, University Tutorial Press, is. During the past few j-ears several excellent introductory books on Modern Botany have appeared. Not the least useful of these is this, the latest, under review. The book is written by a botanist who has done work in vegetable physiology, and has also had experience in teaching. The first hundred pages are devoted to the structure and functions of the stem, root, and leaves of a plant, directions being given for practical work, and series of questions here, as in other parts of the book, set. Accounts of flower, fruit, seed, and classification follow, the characters of many natural orders being given and illustrated. The appendix on physiology is very good as far as it goes— probably as far as one could expect in an elementary book. The book is illustrated by 236 figures, some of which are severely diagrammatic, but as the book is avowedly prepared to meet the requirements of a certain examination this feature in the illustrations is to be expected as clearness is a distinct advantage. If the subject of elementary botany could be generally taught in Irish schools on the lines laid down in Dr. Ewart's book there would be a marked advance, with benefit to student and country. October, 1900.J 235 THE HABITS OF THE HAIRY- ARMED BAT, Ve:SPKRUGO LKISI.KRI, KUHI,. BY C. B. MOFFAT. In the Irish Nahiralist for June of this year (p. 162) I stated that the bat which forms the subject of the present paper frequented a certain pasture-field at Ballyhyland, and that I had some hopes of finding its sleeping-place there, and of obtaining a specimen which would add it without doubt to the Wexford fauna. These objects have since been accomplished ; and I have succeeded in learning some facts relating to the animal's mode of life, which call for a somewhat detailed record. All excellent account of this animal's general characteristics was given by Dr. Alcock in his valuable paper in the Irish Naturalist for August, 1899 (vol. viii., p. 172). It is the largest of Irish bats, specimens weighing from 220 to 310 grains whilst the common Pipistrelle, in my experience, weighs from 70 to 90, and the I^ong-eared Bat from 100 to 130 grains. It flies early"", high in the air ; its voice is powerful and shrill ; and its habit of constantly screeching in certain spots is apt to betray its presence. Its exact periods of flight and repose have hitherto not been investigated, and on this point Dr. Alcock expresses himself wdth scientific caution : — ** As far as I can ascertain — the point is difficult to determine — the Hairy-armed Bat flies for about an hour, and then retires, not to reappear till the next evening." For a mammal to enjoy so short a period of activity as this would be very singular, and during a recent visit to Fassaroe — a headquarters of Vesperugo Leisleri — I obtained evidence that the flight is not so strictly limited, for on July 22nd I saw several bats of this species flying in the early mor?iing : — the first and last being noted respectively at 2.56 and 3.36 a.m., or 65 and 25 minutes before sunrise. That they were Hair>^- armed Bats I was certain ; but specimens could not then be procured. ^ On August 8th Mr. James Kelly, herd at Ballyhyland, pointed one out to me which he had observed on the wing at 7.30 p.m., 11 minutes before sunset. 236 The hish Natuj'alist. [October, However, the discover}^ that Vespcj'ugo Leislcri is a morning flier was a useful step towards tracing some of these animals to their sleeping place at Ballyhyland, the morning light being infinitel}^ preferable to that of evening for such a purpose* On the morning of August loth I accordingly w^atched from 2.45 a.m. in the pasture-field already referred to, taking my stand near an old and hollow ash-tree which I had reason to suspect the bats might inhabit. At 3.35 a.m. their screams were audible in the open, where several w^ere soon afterwards seen, hawking and sporting above the level of the tree-tops. At 4.2 one of them suddenl}^ dipped from its elevation, and when near the ground darted towards the trunk of the old ash, where it entered a hole about seven feet from the ground. At 4.5 another dipped, and shot into the same hole. At 4. 11 a third followed suit ; at 4.12 a fourth entered another hole, some two feet higher up in the same tree. This was the last bat seen that morning. The four individuals noted had homed respectively 33, 30, 24, and 23 minutes before sunrise.^ The hole into which three of the four bats had vanished was evidently the entrance to a cavity of some extent, but it was too narrow to admit of any examination of the interior. In the evening I saw the three come out again, one at 7.53 and two at 8 p.m., or 16 and 23 minutes after sunset. On the following evening five were seen, all issuing from the same hole, between 7.47 and 7.57 — their times of emergence being respectively 12, 16, 17, 19, and 22 minutes after sunset. On the 12th I again saw five come out : the first one minute, the others respectively 8, 11, 13, and 16 minutes after sunset. When quitting their abode, though high fliers at other times, these bats skim very low over the grass. The question of the animal's return to its sleeping-den during the night was less easily settled. On two evenings I watched the hole without au}^ success, though the moon was full and bright, and I hid in the shadow of the ash-boughs not to dis- concert the homing bats. The fact, however, that this large and noisy species suddenly ceases to be either visible or audible about an hour and twenty minutes after sunset weighed strongl}^ against the idea of its continuing on the wing all ' In explanation of these figures, I should state that at Ballyhyland (lat. 52° 31 N., long. 6^ 43' W.) sunrise on August loth is 4 minutes later than at Dublin, and sunset i minute earlier. I900.J Moffat. — The Habits of the Hairy-armed Bat. 237 night. Other considerations also pointed to the probability of its retiring earlj^ as the Noctule is known to do (though that species has not 5^et been ascertained to come out again in the morning). Dr. Alcock had drawn my attention to the fact that Hairj^-armed Bats shot by him an hour after sunset had their stomachs so crammed with food that it seemed a physical impossibility they could feed much longer. I therefore argued that since I could not detect the bats going i7i in the evening, I must endeavour to catch them as the}^ came out in the morning. This would at least prove the fact, though not the time, of their retirement after dusk. So, on the night of August 12th, I fixed a net at midnight over the mouth of the hole. In the early morning hours of the 13th I watched by this net (some brilliant Perseid meteors relieving the monotony of the vigil), and at 3.15 a.m. heard a bat gently flop into it. I found that I had secured a fine female Vesperugo Leisleri, caught emerging for her morning flight, one hour and twenty-six minutes before sunrise. Having made sure of my specimen, I quickly removed the net so as not to disturb the remaining inmates of the hole in their egress. I failed to see any bats emerge — the light being too dim — but at 4. 20 had the satisfaction of seeing one re-enter. As this individual cannot have left the hole while the net was over it, the duration of its flight had not exceeded sixty- five minutes. In the evening of the same day I saw four bats (the sur\dvors of the colony of five) emerge for their evening flight in quick succession between 7.38 and 7.42, 6 and 10 minutes after sunset ; and at 8.53 by a fortunate chance, the moon's rays falling full on the line of flight at the moment, I succeeded in seeing one go in. This was one hour twenty-one minutes after sunset. As the interval between earliest and latest emergence had been so short, the duration of this example's flight can be told with some exactness. It cannot have been on the wing for a longer period than 75 or a shorter one than 71 minutes. We may thus claim to have a set of data, limited in number, but precise as far as they go, determining the flight-time of this local and somewhat imperfectly-studied species. It has an evening flight and a morning flight, the two being of about A 2 238 The hish Naturalist. [October, equal duration. The evening flight is usually commenced a little earlier than 15 minutes after sunset, the average of seventeen actual emergences noted being 13 J minutes, the earliest i minute, the latest 23 minutes, and the mean between the extremes 12 minutes after sunset. The bat returns at night to the same hole as serves it for sleeping apartment by da)^ ; the precise time of its return, in the only instance noted, having been 81 minutes after sunset. Its moment of leaving the hole in the morning has also been noted only once, in the case of the specimen caught on August 13th ; but it should be remembered that this individual must have been the first to emerge on the date in question, and therefore the usual time of emergence is probably a little later than 86 minutes before sunrise. The time of going home in the morning, on an average of five observations, is 26 minutes before sunrise, the earliest and latest instances having been 2>Z ^iid 21 minutes before the sun. It has been shown that the duration of one individual's (evening) flight was at least 71 minutes, whilst that of another's (morning flight) was not more than 65 minutes. The usual duration is, in all probability, not far from the mean between these two figures. The animal, there- fore, in summer, spends one-tenth of its time on the wing, and the remaining nine-tenths in its sleeping-hole. In the shortness of its fiight-time it is probably unique among Irish bats. Whether the same retreat is used in winter as during summer I cannot say."" The field is frequented to a certain extent from May to September ; but until midsummer, when the cattle are pastured there, the bats fly in it for only a few minutes each evening, just before retiring for the night. This ^ I can uow (September 15th) answer this question with a qualified negative, as the bats have lately desertecl the hole, and bestowed themselves in separate crevices in the higher part of the tree. It is noteworthy that they migrated singly, on different dates. On Sept. loth three (instead of four) emerged from the common den ; on the nth, two ; on the 13th, none. This shows that they changed their abode voluntarily ; if they had been disturbed or alarmed they would all have left at once. They still fly every evening from their new quarters. No two inhabit the same hole. This apparent scattering for the winter — though it might be thought a useful sanitary precaution before becoming torpid and helpless — is the exact opposite to what has been reported of several pther species, including F, noctula. I900.] Moffat. — The Habits of the Hairy-armed Bat. 239 shows that they range some distance in quest of food. During the late summer months the half-hour before retirement is spent in careering about the field. Their fancy for cow- pastures is a point to which I have previously drawn attention (p. 162), and is doubtless explained by the presence of certain species of insects in such localities. My captive, whom I fed exclusively on insects for a week, refused various house-flies, as well as the blue-bottle {Calliphora erythrocephald), common crane-fly (Tipula oleracea), and horse- fly {Hcematopota pluvialis)y but enjoyed the common Volucella. She partook with relish of the honey-bee {Apis 77iellifica), and of five species of wasp ( Vespa vulgaris , V. ger^nariica, V. rufa, V. sylvestris, ^ and V. 7iorvegica). A humble-bee {Bombus terrestris) and red-tailed bee {B. lapidaritcs) were eaten, but subsequent specimens of B. terrestris were declined. The only coleoptera ofi"ered, a few small scatophagous beetles, were promptly devoured. Above all, she evinced an extraordinary partiality for the common cockroach {Blatta oriefitalis). This ^vas a highly convenient taste, since it could be gratified at the most unearthly hours, and at such hours did her ladyship, who lived in a box in my bed-room, frequently wake me with orders to fetch her something immediately from the kitchen ! She has eaten nearly a third of her weight in cockroaches in one night Next to the cockroach, I think her favourite food (among the insects ofiered) was the honey-bee, when dead ; but she showed the greatest horror when I offered her a living bee, though I held it securely in my hand, and had previously extracted its sting. This was no mere accident, for the experiment was repeated on successive days. In two instances she managed, apparently by a sudden *' flick" of her tongue, to throw the bee to a distance. At first I was surprised that this nocturnal mammal should so well comprehend the offensive capabilities of a day-flying insect ; but when we remember the common propensity of both Vespericgo Leisleri and Apis mellifica to take up their abode in hollow trees, it is at once seen to be quite natural that they should know something of each other's powers. The identical ash-tree in which the Hairy-armed Bats now under notice reside has often been occupied by bee-swarms. 240 The Irish Nahiralist. [October, The pedestrian habits of this species in captivity (so unlike those of the Pipistrelle) have been noticed by Dr. Alcock (/. N'at., vol. viii., p. 173), and by Mr. Barrett-Hamilton (/. Nat.^ vol. ix., p. 134). Those of my specimen were .similar ; I onl^^ once saw it take flight, from the edge of my bed, and I suspect til at Vcspcrugo Leisleri has some difficulty in taking wing from a level .surface. Once, too, I was wakened by the whirr of its wings cutting circles round the room. This bat is undoubtedly an early hibernator, retiring abruptly about the 26th of September, the date mentioned in Dr. Alcock's paper. The exact period is probably fixed by the falling temperature. At Ballyhyland, in 1899, my obser- vations in the accustomed place of flight were — September 25th, usual number flj^ng ; 26th, onl}- one ; 27th, none. The maximum temperatures for the above three dates were respectively 57^^, 53^, and 49*^ Fahr. But though hibernation thus commences early, it is subject, like that of other species, to interruption on the return of warm weather. Near Fassaroe, during a warm spell, I have seen I^eisler's Bat flying numerously on October 17th, and a single specimen on October 20th. The late A. G. More identified one captured indoors at Cromlyn as late as November 1 6th, 1894 {Irish Naturalist, 1897, p. 135), and Mr. Nichols has informed me that this specimen is in the Museum. The lowest temperature at which I have noted Hairy-armed Bats in the open is 46° (on October 8th, 1899), but on that evening they were out in some numbers. I therefore think that this species is more influenced by the heat of the day than by that of the actual time of flight ; for I have never seen it when the day's viaximuvi was below 52^'-', and never numerously with a lower maximum than 56® Fahr. A slight odour, not unlike the '* scent" of the fox, marks the entrance to the den of the Hairy-armed Bat. Ballyhyland, Co. Wexford. I900-J 241 OBITUARY. THOMAS WORKMAN, J. P. The suddeu death iu St. Paul, Minnesota, U.S.A., on nth Ma}', of Mr. Thomas Workman, caused deep regret not only in Belfast and its Natural History and Philosophical Society (of which he was at the time President), but throughout Ireland. Although largely occupied in business, religious, and philanthropic work, INIr. Workman devoted much time to natural history pursuits, and undertook several journeys to tropical countries largely with the object of studying exotic animals in their natural surroundings. In 1881 he visited Brazil ; in 1883 he spent eight months in the east — India, Burniah, Singapore, China, and the Phillipines. In 1888 he was in vSingapore and Ceylon, in 1890 in Singa- pore and Java, and in 1892 in Cejdou, Singapore, and India again. As already mentioned, his death — at the age of 56 — took place during an ex- tensive journey in North America. Notes of many of these journeys were communicated to the Belfast Natural History and Philosophical Society. Mr. Workman was well-known to zoologists as an ardent student of the spiders. On the suggestion of the Rev. O. P. Cambridge he made large collections of these animals in Ulster. He published a valuable Irish list in 18S0 {Entomologist^ vol. xiii.), and gave much generous help to one of the editors of this journal in recent years. Mr. Workman leaves an unfinished book on Malaysian Spiders, with plates and valuable synonymic and bionomic notes. Only one complete volume has been published, but it is hoped that the deceased naturalist's MSS. will allow at least some more of his valuable work to be given to his fellow-students of a most fascinating group of animals. ARTHUR WYNNE FOOT, M.D. A link with the former generation of Irish naturalists is severed by the death of Dr. A. W. P'oot, which took place on September ist, after years of delicate health. Born at Dublin in 1838, he graduated in Arts and Medicine at Trinity College in 1862, and subsequently rose to great eminence in his profession, occupjdug in later years the posts of Vice- President of the College of Physicians, and Professor of Medicine in the College of vSurgeons, He will be remembered by naturalists for his researches in Irish entomology. Almost the only follower in this country of the great Haliday's work on the Diptera, Dr. Foot published two valuable papers in the sixth volume of the Proceedings of the Dublin Nat. Hist. Society (1869). 242 The Irish Naturalist. LOctober, PROCEEDINGS OF IRISH SOCIETIES. RoYAi, Zooi^oGiCAi, Society. Recent gifts include a pair of Pochards from Sir Douglas Brooke, Sparrowhawks from Mrs. Harte and Colonel Mausergh, monkeys from Mr. A. B. Kenny and Mrs. Blakene}', a Kestrel from Miss Lovell, an Otter from Mr. M. Timulty, two Giant Tortoises from the Hon. Walter Rothschild, a cockatoo from Mrs. Booth, Peregrine Falcons from Mr. Brooke and Mr. H. M. Winder, and a pair of Green Linnets from Mr. Kdwards. 18,064 persons visited the Gardens during August. Belfast Naturai^ists' FieivD Ci.ub. June 23 — The third field meeting of the summer session was held in Tollymore Park, by kind permission of Lord Roden. The park is laid out on the sloping sides of a valley, through which the Shimna River traces a winding course. The bed of the river is formed of some of the oldest stratified rocks in Co. Down, and illustrates in a remarkable manner the eroding effect of river action, and the fantastic forms into which running water can sculpture the very hardest rocks. About eighteen birds were recorded, and a large number of beetles were collected for further examination. As this is a noted botanical district, the botanists were very active, and verified the names of many species. The Vice- President (Mr. W. H. Phillips) offered a prize for the best lists of ferns observed. Mr. Porter, the winner of the first prize, verified seventeen species of ferns, and Mr. Orr took the second prize with fifteen species. A formal meeting of the Club was held in the Roden Arms, in the village of Bryansford, just outside the park gate. Mr. Robert Welch Was formally congratulated upon his being appointed photographer to the Queen. His accepted works included many that were taken in con- nection with the Belfast Naturalists' Field Club. After the election of members, the party adjourned for tea, and returned to Newcastle in time for the last train to Belfast, August it. — The fifth meeting of the session was held at Glenavy and the shore of Lough Neagh. A large party left Belfast, and were joined by members from Lisburn, Antrim, &c. The walk from Glenavy railway station to Lough Neagh — a distance of about two miles — was undertaken under the most favourable conditions, and has highl}- appre- ciated b}^ the part}'. Deviating from the country road, the party entered Glenconwa}^ and for some distance traced the banks of Glenavy River. The latter was very much swollen by the recent rains. The eastern margin of Lough Neagh, with its sandy borders, possesses a varied and very interesting land flora. The aquatic and sub-aquatic plants of its waters and neighbouring drains add considerable interest, and constitute a region most attractive to the botanist. The river glen yields a good many of the sylvan species. Here the melic grass {Mclica Mniflord) was found in profusion and very luxuriant. The Yellow Loose- trife {Lysimachia), one of the many pretty lacustrine plants, was met with I900.] Notes. 243 on the lake shore ; more like a garden species, it was conspicuous by reason of its brilliant heads of yellow flowers. In the lough and adjacent pools one of the rarer pondweeds was found {Poianiogeion hcterophylhis)', it was very abundant, but out of flower. The unusual high water of the lake prevented the collecting of Charas. The Cow- wheat {^Meianipyrum praiense) was found on the roadside going to the lake. An otherwise unattractive roadside wall furnished the best plant of the day. This was Poa conipressa^ which until recently was only recorded from two stations in the North of Ireland. As it is not a conspicuous'plant, it has probably been over- looked, and may possibly be found elsewhere. The well-known fossil wood, or petrified wood, of Lough Neagh was collected along the shore near Sandy Bay. NOTES. BOTANY. MUSCINEyE. Irish Mosses. Messrs. H. W. LETT and C. H. WaddeIvI/ (in Journal of Botany for vSeptember), write : — While on a botanical ramble in July, 1900, we spent two days in the neighbourhood of Benevenagh, in the north of the County Derry. Amongst the sandy Magilligan Flats, at the entrance of Lough Fo3-le, we found Hypmini rngosuni^ Ehrh., and Catoscopinm nigritiun (Hedw.) in some quantity. The former grew in luxuriant masses amongst dwarf heather and grass on the tops of the slight elevations, and the latter — which was in nice fruit — amongst the herbage in the damp hollows of the sandy soil. CHARACEyE. Chara canescens, Loisel., in Galvvay. Early in August last I found a pretty form of this rare plant plentiful in one small pool in a salt-marsh east of Galway. This represents a good extension of its range, its only other known localities in the British Isles being in Kerr}', Wexford, Cornwall, Dorset, and vSuflblk. Messrs. H. and J. Groves have kindly confirmed the identification of my specimens. R. A. Phii,i,ips. Cork. 244 '^^^^ Irish NaUiralist. [October, PHANEROGRA MS. Viola lactea, Smith, in Ireland. On the occasion of the excursion of the Cork Naturalists' Field Club on Whit-Monday last (June 4) to luchigeela, Co. Cork, I collected at that place specimens of several Violas, one of which, on subsequent examina- tion, proved to be V. lactea, Sm. The other specimens included V. erketonim, which was abundant along the lake shore, and hybrids of V. lactea and V. ericelonim, which occurred with the former on rough heathy ground. The occurrence of V. lactea in Ireland seems to have been doubted as, though originally recorded in Dr. Power's " Flora of Cork" (1845) as found by J. Drummond on mountains near Bantry, it is placed in the first edition of Cybele Hibcrnica under V. caiiina, while in the second edition of that work no mention is made of it. Mr. W. H. Beeby, F.L.S., who kindly examined and verified the identity of my specimens, informs me that he possesses specimens of V. lactea sent him May, 1899, collected by Dr. Playfair at Ballyvaughan, Co. Clare, so that there is no longer any reason to exclude this interesting plant from the Irish flora. R. A. Phii,i,ips. Cork. Hypochaeris glabra in Co. Dcrry, In the Journal of Botany for September Messrs. H. W. LiCTT and C. H. WADDEi^r, publish the following note :— At p. 497 of the second edition of the Cybele Hibernica, Hypochceris glabra, Iv., is placed in the appendix, where it is given among the " excluded species," and Mackay's early records of it, which were not repeated in his Flora Hibcrnica, are described for this reason as " no doubt errors," while the only other record of this plant is extinguished with a "perhaps." It is interesting therefore to be able to record the finding of a quantity of this plant in Jul}^, 1900, growing on the extensive wild sandy Magilligan Flats in the north of the County of 'Devry. The plants were all small, dwarfed perhaps by the sandy soil in which they were growing, and not by any means con- spicuous. The station is a level space about a rood in extent, where Thymus Serpyllum wove a purple carpet, varied with white flowering patches, which was a sight to see. There are indications that at some- time or other the patch of ground had been cultivated, as there were slight indications of ridges through it like those left after a crop of potatoes, grown in what the Ulsterman calls "rigs," and are elsewhere designated " laz3'-beds" ; but it is a long time since it bore a crop, as evidenced by the plants now occupying it, and it is now far from any land under tillage. The Flypocharis was also found on the rough ground beyond the limits of the thymy patch. There can be no question from the nature of the locality of its being native. Vitality of Allium vincalc. On June 6 I collected a couple of specimens of the Crow Garlic at I'oulaphouca. The flower-head was then barely showing at the end of the long arching stem. They were put into press, the paper changed a few times, and then set aside .under a heap of other dried plants. On iQoo.] Notes. 245 going througli the buudle at the end of August, these specimens were found to have produced fully-developed heads of bulbils of quite the average size. This surpasses the Sedums, such as S. riipestre^ which has continued growing for six weeks with me after being put into press. The London Pride is another plant of great vitality, ft does not actually grow, but the leaves will retain their moisture and remain fresh for a mouth or six weeks after being gathered, in spite of pressure and frequent changes of paper. R. IvLOYD PrAEGER. Dublin. Senecio squalidus, L<, in Dublin. In June, 1S99, when passing through luchicore in a train, I caught sight of two or three specimens of this species on a wall-top. In the same month this year, being in Dublin, I paid a visit to Inchicore to see if the plant was there only as a casual or as a colonist, and was rather surprised to find it/ first, on the wall by the railway, then, more plentifully on other walls and by pathways in the vicinity, and finally, in profusion, in an enclosure in which was stored a lot of old building and railway material, and in disused garden plots and other waste places. In several spots I also noticed what looks like a radiate form of Senecio vulgaris^ but may be the hybrid S. squaiidtis x vulgaris ( = S, hibernica^ Syme) as, in most cases, it grew in company with these two species. In the same localit}- I noticed a few other interesting aliens, viz., Lychnis alba, Cardnns crispns, d'cpis taraxacifolia, and Hordetun mnrinwn. The presence of S. squaiidtis in Dublin is, I think, worth recording as an instance of a South European plant which, having become well established in the south of Ireland, at Cork, Baudon, Kinsale, &c., within the past seventy years, seems now in a fair way to become a colonist in this much more northern station. I have little doubt that it has been introduced at Inchicore with old building and railway material brought from the Cork terminus of the Great Southern and Western Railway, and it will be interesting to watch the rate at which it spreads to other parts of Co. Dublin. My friend, Dr. R. W. Scully, F.Iv.S., informs me that he has noticed it at luchicore for the past seven or ten years, and that it appears to be spreading. R. A. Phili^ips. Cork. Piantagro media In Co. Wexford. Towards the end of July Miss E. V. Cooper showed me some specimens of this plantain, which she had found growing plentifully in a plot of ground belonging to Killanne National School. As in all its other Irish stations, the plant was probably sown with grass-seed. According to the Cybek Hibernica, Plantago media, or Lamb's-tougue, is spreading in Ireland, but the present seems to be the first instance of its having been gathered in District IV. Its light lavender filaments make it much the prettiest of the genus. C. B. Moffat. Ballyhyland, Co. Wexford. 246 The Irish Natia'aiisf. [October, ZOOLOGY. CRUSTACEA. Haplophthalinus iviengrei, Zaddach, in Ireland. I am glad to be able to report the occurreuce in Ireland of this rare woodlouse— only yet recorded from one locality in Great Britain. It was taken at Carcumroe Abbey, Co. Clare, bj'the Rev. Canon Norman, F,R.vS., when we visited that interesting neighbourhood in Jul}-. Two examples only were found. Wm. F. de V. Kane. Drumreaske, Monaghan. Colias edusa In Ireland. Travelling from Clonbrock to Dublin to-day (27th August) I saw a number of specimens of Colias edusa — four or five specimens near Ballina- sloe, three males on the Roscommon side of the Shannon at Athlone, one male at Hill of Down, one male near Kilcock, and two specimens near Maynooth. R. B. Dii,i,ON. Clonbrock. On nth September I had the rare pleasure of seeing at Howth a beautifully fresh male of Colias cdusa. It was sucking the flowers of Lotus corniailatus and, while I watched it, visited no other sort. As it flits from tuft to tuft closing its wings completely on alighting, the protective resemblance is surprising in an insect in which, looking only at cabinet specimens, one would hardly suspect it. W. B. Hart. Howth. Lepidoptera near Londonderry. The following are new to me as local species ; I think they have not been previously recorded for this district : — Vanessa io. — My sister. Miss A. M. Campbell, captured a lovely specimen of the Peacock on 30th August, at Ballynatena, near Londonderry. It had evidently just emerged from the chrysalis. Melitaa aitrinia.—On. 9th June my nephew, F. C. Campbell, jun., took this fritillary at Port Awe, near Buncrana, just at the spot where his father, Mr. W. Howard Campbell, took Heliothis scutosa in August, 1878. Zygoc)ia loniccrcc. — On 29th June my nephew took among a lot of Z. filipLiidiilLC, a specimen of Z. lonicerce^ at Inch Road Station on the Buncrana Line. On 20th May my friend, Mr. Wm. Taylor, saw Theda rubi at Lackagh Bridge, near Creslough, Co. Donegal, and procured a specimen. I had never seen either M. aiuuiia or 7'. rubi in this district, but I believe the late Dr. Osborne, of Milford, Co. Donegal, took both .species. D. C. Campbei,!,. Londonderry. 1900.] Notes, 247 <* WarUIcs " in Horses. It is apparently a foct not generally recognized that " warbles " similar to those found in cattle also occur in horses. Last April several warble- maggots were squeezed out of a horse at Ballyhyland, where the coach- man assures me that he has extracted others in former 3'ears. In the Zoologist for July last (p. 340) is a r^sumd of an article on " Enemies of the Horse " by Mr. F. V. Theobald (contributed to the Journal by the South- eastern Agricultural College, Wye), in which some reference is made to this subject. Mr. Theobald is there quoted as saying that a fly, so far unidentified, which forms warbles or tumours under the horse's skin, like the Ox Warble, is probably Hypoderma silenus', its attacks are said to be uncommon in this country. Whatever be the name of the fly, I think it well to mention that it occurs in Co. Wexford, and probably elsewhere in Ireland, though I do not suppose it is anywhere in this country a source of serious mischief. Ballyhyland, Co. Wexford, C. B, Moffat. BIRDS. The Ruff in Ireland. I have just had the pleasure of reading Dr. Patten's carefully prepared article on the Ruff {supra, p. 187). In it he treats of the occurrences of this bird in Ireland in more detail than I have had space to do in the " Birds of Ireland," a work w^hicli is now in the publisher's hands. In drawing deductions from available records of a rare bird, allowance is to be made for several circumstances before a just estimate can be formed of its range or the season of its visits. Thus the discontinuance of shooting in spring, which was evidently practised a good deal in Thompson's time, may partly account for the more recent absence of records of the Ruff in March, April, and May, such as he cites. It is natural that the greater number of the instances that Thompson gives should have taken place near Belfast Lough, the immediate scene of his observations, and also that many Ruffs should have been heard of on Dublin Bay, where many good observers have shot, and where taxidermists are not far off. Thompson had few correspondents in the West, especially in Connaught, and the greater number of records of the Ruff from the western part of Ireland made since his time, may be due to the spread of interest in ornithology rather than to any extension of the range of this species in Ireland. Dr. Patten makes one remark in which I am unable to concur, namely, that sportsmen as a rule are keen observers, and that few strange birds pass them unnoticed. I would beg his attention to the following which have been found among game sent in from various parts of Ireland : — the Pink-footed Goose, Snow Goose, Ferruginous Duck, Little Bustard, American Lesser Golden Plover, Pectoral Sandpiper, Bartram's Sand- piper, Red-breasted Snipe, and Eskimo Curlew. No doubt Mr. Williams can add instances of many other occasional visitors that he has found exposed for sale as game in the Dublin markets. These remarks are made in that friendly spirit of free discussion which I would myself gladly invite. Cappagh, Co. Waterford. R. J. USSHEiR. 248 The h'ish Naturalist, [October, Irish Birds. We welcome the publication of the great work on the Migration of Birds, on which Mr. R. M. Barrington, aided by Mrs. Barrington and Mr. C. B. MofFatt, has been engaged for several years. The book not onl)^ gives in full the reports of the committee on bird-migration from iSSi to 1897, but includes elaborate analyses of the reportsfrom 1881 till 1897. The observations on which the reports and analyses are founded were made by the Keepers of the light-ships and light-houses around the Irish coasts, with the aid of printed schedules and instructions, and the correctness of their identifications were checked by means of the preserving of a leg and wing of the birds killed by striking the lanterns. The book is published by Kdward Ponsonby, Dublin, and may be obtained from the publisher or the author, price 25^-. net. Only 350 copies have been printed. The long-promised general work on the Birds of Ireland b}' Messrs. R. J. Ussher and R. Warren is just issued. W^e observe that a reliable record of the distribution of each species of bird in Ireland has been made the primary object of the book, which contains also many original observations on life, history, and habits. This book is published by Messrs. Gurney and Jackson at 30^-. We hope that both works will be duly noticed in our next issue. MAMMALS, The Vision of Whales and of amphibious animals generally. In reference to the interestingsuggestion of Mr. R. Lloyd Patterson, page 210, that whales probably have the power to ascertain the position of a ball of fry by " looking round them " when at the surface so as to see the birds hovering over and dipping for the fry or to hear their cries, a question arises — Can the whale see when its eyes are out of water .? Just as in diving under water, w^e whose eyes are adapted for use in air cannot see clearly, so conversely an animal with eyes suited only for water could not see clearly in air. Are a whale's eyes "only" so suited.? To enable the human eye to see clearly under v/ater it is only necessary to use a convex lens of a focus correcting for the difference in the index of refraction of water as compared with that of air. When a whale rises out of the water has it any means of making a correction the converse of this by lengthening the focus of its eyes, or can it perhaps shorten the distance between the lens and retina ? This question suggests one which no doubt could be more easily investigated— Can a frog see well both in air and water.? I have not the honour of being a naturalist, and therefore know not if such questions have been already asked and answered, but if not they would seem to present an interesting field for research. J. Brown. Belfast. I900.1 Notes. 249 SOME RECENT I^ITERATURE. Text-book of Zoology, treated from a Biological Standpoint. By Dr. Otto Schmeii<. Translated from the German by Rudolph Rosenstock, M.A, and edited by J. T. Cunningham, M.A. Part 2. Birds, Reptiles, Fishes. Loudon: A. aud C. Black, 1900. Pp. vi. and 306. Price 31. 6f/. With commeudable promptitude, the second part of Dr. Schmeil's work has been issued to English readers, so tliat the whole of the Vertebrates have now been dealt with. The same plan is followed as in Part I (Mammals) which we noticed last month, a somewhat full account of a typical species of Bird, Reptile, or Fish serving as an introduction to the study of its Order or family. We notice with pleasure that the author advocates the protection of birds. The descriptions of the structural details, of the creatures in relation to their mode of life are excellent and stimulating, but there is regrettable weakness in the systematic treatment of the subject. The Lampreys and Lancelet are classed among the Fishes, and the latter animal is stated to occupy " the lowest stage in the Vertebrate division of the animal kingdom," while the account of " the Chameleon" would inevitably lead the student to imagine that there is but a single species of that group of reptiles. The numerous illustrations are, for the most part, accurate and attractive. G. H. C. White Cattle : An Inquiry into their origin ancJ history, by R. H. Wai^LACE, Trans. Nat. Hist. Soc, Glasgow, vol. 5 (N.S.), parts 2 and 3, 1897-99. Mr. Wallace's paper on the origin and histor}- of white cattle is full of interest to Irish naturalists. Although he considers his paper simply as a preliminary collation of data, he devotes over a hundred pages to a care- ful inquiry into the subject, giving also a most useful bibliography at the end. IVIr. Wallace seems to us to give satisfactory evidence that the commonly accepted view of the so-called wild white cattle being the descendants of feral prehistoric cattle is incorrect. Wliile his view is by no means new, having also recently been advocated by Prof M'Kenny Hughes, of Cambridge, Prof. Boyd Dawkins, and others, he thinks the origin 'of white cattle can be traced to one or two sources. They come either from white cattle imported in Roman times for sacrificial purposes or from collections of white calves, which, being dropped by dark-coloured cattle, were regarded in those times as a portent of good, and therefore care- fully preserved. Throughout this interesting paper we find frequent references to Kerry cattle, which Mr. Wallace considers a ver}- ancient breed, which has remained in the same condition as it is now for a good many centuries. R. F. S. 250 The Irish Naturalist, [October, 1900, Flora of Bournemouth, including the Isle of Purbeck, being an account of the flowering plants, ferns, &c., of the country within a twelve-mile radius of the centre of Bournemouth. By Edward F. IvTNTON, M.A., Oxon. 8vo. 10+290 pp. Map. Bournemouth: published by the author [1900]. Price 85-. ^d. Mr. Linton has given us a pretty and pleasant book. While clearly intended for popular use, its scientific accuracy is in no way impaired thereby. The Bournemouth area embraces portions of two counties, and in the preparation of his work our author had the great advantage of the existence of a comprehensive Flora of each of the counties concerned — Townsend's " Flora of Hampshire " (1883), and Mansell-Pleydell's "Flora of Dorset " (2nd ed., 1895) ; but the great bulk of the localities given are original, and represent the work of the author, and such valuable assistants as Rev. W. R. Linton, Rev. W. Moyle Rogers, and many others. The distribution of each plant in the prescribed area has been worked out in great detail. The Introduction is useful and concise, with paragraphs on topography, climate, geology, botanical divisions, and comparison of the floras of the two counties, and of the six divisions into which the Bournemouth area is divided : also a key to less known localities, recommended walks, and Latin and English vocabulary — features unusual in such works, but useful in popularizing a know^ledge of local botan5\ We are surjjrised to find no history of Bournemouth botany or botanists, nor any bibliography : this strikes us as an unhappy omission. Another important point not referred to is the general extent and character of the flora, and its analysis, showing its relation to the flora of England in general and the adjoining districts. In the body of the work all plants, from natives to the merest casuals, appear in the same type. While giving a look of pleasant uniformity to the pages, the ver}^ unequal value of the entries so displayed is hardly made sufiiciently clear by the word " outcast," "introduced," or "casual," in the line succeeding the heading ; no attempt is made to distinguish truly indigenous species from colonists or denizens. Even plants which are probably errors, such as Viola stagnina, appear in the same type as the best established natives. The working out of the distribution of the plants is excellent, and the critical genera have received an amount of attention that is very seldom possible in a local flora. The book is excellentl}' printed and neatly bound, and should prove invaluable to the l)otanist at Bournemouth, whether resident, migratory, or casual. R. Li., p. November, 1900.] 251 THE BIRDS OF IRKI.ANDJ BY C. B. MOFFAT. The completion of Mr. Ussher's long-expected work is an event to be hailed with universal satisfaction. The ornitho- logists ol this counto^ now possess a manual of which it is impossible not to feel proud, embodying as it does an account of our avifauna so comprehensive and thorough as to be literally beyond praise. The work to which Mr. Ussher has devoted so many 3^ears of patient toil is worthy of him in every respect. Besides bringing our knowledge fully up to date as regards the distribution of birds in our own island, it is a valuable contribution to general British ornithology, and the more closely it is studied the better it will be prized. In speaking of the volume as Mr. Ussher's, it is not meant to ignore the important aid given by his colleague in the author- ship, Mr. Robert Warren. Mr. Warren, besides writing a number of the articles, has contributed enough from his great store of personal observations on birds to considerably enrich the book. But it is at the same time well known that the work is substantially Mr. Ussher's, and that to him we are primarily indebted for the accumulation and arrangement of the vast mass of materials which are here presented to the student with such mature judgment and such scrupulous care. The book opens with a preface in which the authors state briefly their object and plan, paying a well-deserved tribute to the memor}^ of their distinguished predecessor, Thompson, whose work^ though long out of print, contains so much original information that it can never cease to be a standard. The preface is followed by an introduction, treating of the striking features of Irish ornithology, and noting the principal changes which have taken place in it of late years. Then comes a very carefully prepared table, showing the distribution of our breeding birds in counties. Mr. Ussher takes the ^ The Birds of Ireland, an Account of the Distribution, lYllg:ratlon, and Habits of Birds as observed in Ireland, with all additions to the Irish list; by Richard J. Ussher and Robert Warren. Including an Introduction and Tables showing the Distribution of Birds in the Breeding Season. With a coloured Plate, Maps, and other illustrations ; pp. xxxii. + 419. ;^i los. lyondon : Gurney & Jackson, 1900. A 252 The Irish Nat7iraUst . [November, counties in an order of his own, wliicli is neither Professor Babington's nor Mr. Praeger's, but is made to correspond with their arrangement into provinces ; thus the Munster counties come first, followed by those of Leinster, Connaught, and Ulster. The S3'mbols emploj^ed in this table need to be .studied attentivel}^ but we think we are safe in inferring, although Mr. Ussher does not sa}^ so definitelj' in his ''ke}^" that wherever an asterisk is used and is not followed b}^ a note of interroga- tion, the implied statement is that the species breeds regiilarly in the county under whose name such asterisk occurs. Then come the articles on each species which compose the bod}' of the work (pp. 1-396), the order followed being that of Mr. Howard Saunders' Illustrated Manual. In an Appendix, fifteen aliens, whose claims to inclusion in the list of Irish birds are considered insufficient, are shortly noticed ; and a final supple- ment communicates some additional information received since going to press. There is a handsome coloured frontis- piece— " Peregrine Falcon's Eggs from Ireland," — and several photographs, showing nests of the Siskin, Peregrine, Cor- morant, Woodcock, Little Tern, &c., add to the attractiveness of the book. A map of Ireland, in two sections, showing the unreclaimed land, is placed after the index. It is obvious on the most cursor}^ inspection that the volume before us nobl}^ fulfils its primary- object of outlining the dis- tribution of birds in Ireland. On this subject Mr. Ussher has spared himself no pains, and the information given is as full and exact as could possibly be asked for. It was a work of years to collect the data presented in the opening table, and equal labour has been bestowed on the occurrences of irregular visitants. These are chiefly grouped according to counties, but when onl}^ about six occurrences of a species are known, they are placed in order of time, instead of in geographical arrangement. As might be expected, habits and nidification have not been lost sight of, especiall}^ as regards birds which are considered characteristic of Ireland. The articles on the Peregrine Falcon, Chough, Siskin, Crossbill, Woodcock, and Common Guillemot are, from this cause, written at much greater length than most of the others, and are of more than average interest. The Peregrine article is probabl}^ the masterpiece of the book, and the passage descriptive of the I900.J Moffat. — The Birds of h'cland. 253 eyrie of that bird ivS most graphic. Some readers may think the account of the Chough's home even better. A conspicuous feature of the book is its frequent references to Mr.Barrington's recently published Migration Reports, and in this connection it is right to point out that Mr. Ussher's inferences from the Reports are the result of his own independent analj^sis, and are not in any way based on Mr. Barrington's, though in the main the two sets of deductions accord very well. Where they differ, the source of disagreement will usually be found in some uncorroborated light-keeper's observations which Mr. Ussher has accepted and Mr. Barrington doubted ; this being so, it is, perhaps, not a subject for regret that both points of view should be before the public. Mr. Ussher includes in the Irish list 288 species of birds, of which 134 breed in Ireland, or have done so within the ex- piring centur}^ while 37 others visit us annually, and the remaining 117 are irregular visitants. The above total does not include any of the following 15, which are relegated to the Appendix : — American Robin, Belted Kingfisher. Egyptian Goose. Reed-Warbler. Yellow-billed Cuckoo. Canada Goose. Gold-vented Thrush. Black-billed Cuckoo. Passenger Pigeon. Purple Martin. American Goshawk. Green-backed Gallinule. Ortolan. Black-winged Kite. Yellow-billed Sheathbill. It is not disputed that some of these 7nay have been bona fide migrants, but it has been thought safer to take the sceptical side of the question in each instance. The additions which have been made to the list since Thompson's day are numerous, and include the following, which were added since the 2nd edition of More's list was published in 1890 ; — Lesser Whitethroat. Lesser Kestrel. Barred Warbler. Lesser Golden Plover. Yellow-browed Warbler. Sociable Plover. Rufous Warbler. Spotted Sandpiper. Woodchat Shrike. Red-breasted Snipe. Serin. Wilson's Petrel. Short-toed Lark. Apart from these, the Crested Lark, which was included by Thompson but rejected by More, has been re-admitted, on grounds which we propose to discuss before concluding this A 2 254 '^^^^ Irish Nahiralist. [November, notice. Another change is the displacement of the Dusky Shearwater {Piiffimis obsairtis^ Gmel.), by the I^ittle Dusky Shearwater {P. assimilis, Gould), the bird caught off Valentia having been re-examined and found to belong to the latter type. Of more interest than such stragglers are the regular visitants and resident species, and the fluctuating character of our fauna is well illustrated by the numerous changes which Mr. Ussher shows to have taken place in the distribution and relative abundance of these since the publication of Thomp- son's ^vork. The disappearance of our larger birds of prey has been rapid. The Golden and Sea Eagles are nearly gone, and the Buzzard, as a breeding species, quite so. The Hen Harrier, common in the western counties fift}^ years ago, has become scarce ; and scarcer still is the Marsh Harrier, though in 1853 this was the most abundant of all our larger Accipitres. With the Eagles and Harriers we are quickly losing the Raven, and the range of the Chough is much more restricted than formerl}-. From unascertained causes the Quail has nearl}^ ceased to visit us, and the Roseate Tern is no longer known to breed. It would also seem that the Common Tern is losing ground, since it has now no known breeding station on the east coast of Leinster. The Wood- Lark, Mr. Ussher thinks, has in most of its haunts been exterminated by bird-catchers, and the Marsh Titmouse, which was perhaps resident in ver}^ small numbers in Thompson's day, has not been met with for many years. The Goldfinch has decreased in the vicinity of large towns, but elsewhere, unlike the Wood-Lark, holds its own. Against these losses \w^y be balanced a considerable number of gains. The settlement of the Stock-Dove and Tufted Duck, and the rapid increase of the Crossbill and Woodcock as breeding species, are particularly remarkable. The Starling's recent extension of its breeding-range in Ireland is also matter of notoriety, and the same may be said of the Siskin. There is strong reason to believe that the Chiffchaff was not, in Thompson's day, so widespread and common a bird as now. The Coal Titmouse, Spotted Flycatcher, Tree-Sparrow, Lesser Redpoll, Bullfinch, Rook, Jackdaw, and Red-breasted Mergan- ser, are further instances of species which Mr. Ussher considers to be increasing. We think he might have said the I900.1 Moffat. — The Birds of Irela7id. 255 same of the House-Martin, as regards the rural districts of Ireland, though of late years it has diminished in Dublin. The Swift has extended its range to the west, where in Thompson's time it was rare. The Jay, whose former wide range had been much reduced by the destruction of woods, is spreading again. The Mistle-Thrush is probably still gaining ground, and it is doubtful whether the ubiquitous Magpie's increase has yet been checked. There are other species of which it must remain open to doubt whether they have actually increased or not, since it is possible that they were locally overlooked in former years, owing to paucity of observers. Such, among breeding birds, are the Redstart, Blackcap, Garden-Warbler, Grasshopper- Warbler, Yellow Wagtail, Dunlin, Sandwich Tern, and Fork- tailed Petrel. There is also the curious case of the Black Redstart, once accounted a very rare straggler, while now it must be ranked as almost a regular winter visitant to our south coast. We cannot as yet say whether the greater frequency of its recent ocurrences is real or apparent. But the careful data now accumulated will make it easy to gauge the increase or decrease of any of the above-named in future ; and this is a great step in advance, for which Mr. Ussher is to be thanked. The subject of distribution, which has been so fully worked out, is infinitely more important in itself than any questions regarding the treatment of reported occurrences of rare stragglers ; and we are therefore not disparaging Mr. Ussher's work in expressing ourselves at variance with him on several of these minor matters. It would have been best either to have banished to the Appendix every bird not absolutely proved to have visited Ireland, or else to have admitted to the regular list all species for whom a p7 ima facie case could be made out. Instead of adopting either of these courses, Mr. Ussher has drawn or accepted an arbitrary line, discarding eight American birds — most of which undoubtedly occurred in this country in a wild state — because they are open to suspicion of having obtained ''assisted passages" on vessels ; while he admits the Crested Lark, I^esser Spotted Woodpecker, and I^ittle Egret, whose alleged occurrences are not vouched for by any specimens whatever. As regards the exclusions, 256 The Irish Nahiralist. [November, Mr, Ussher may consider that he has sufficient warrant in following Mr. Howard Saunders ; but thi^: does not vindicate the consistency of the book, for it may fairly be asked whether any vSpecies has been admitted by Mr. Saunders to the British list on evidence so slight as Mr. Ussher adduces for saddling the Irish list with Alauda cristata. The facts as to the Crested L^ark are as follows : — The Dubli7i Painy Journal of February 27th, 1836 (Vol. IV., p. 276), contained an announcement of the shooting of an example of that species near Tane}^ Co. Dublin, the communication being signed " W. R.," and accompanied by a woodcut representing thebird. Thompson, on the strength ofthis anonymous evidence, admitted the species to the Irish list, but it was subsequently excluded by More, and indeed the case for its admission at that period was so obviously w^eak as to call for no further examination. In 1893, however, some fresh evidence on the subject was adduced, showing that the writer of the letter to the Dublin Pejiny Jottrnal was none other than the now celebrated war correspondent, Sir W. H. Russell, who was a boy of fifteen when he shot the supposed Crested Lark and forw^arded the notice and figure for publication. Whether this revelation of the writer's identity makes the case for admission stronger or weaker than it was before is a question on which opinions will differ ; but the circumstances at least show that there w^as room for error. It is true that the bird was taken for identifi- cation to "a Mr. Colville, a member of the Royal Dublin Society," w^ho pronounced it a Crested I^ark, and showed his young interrogator a figure of that species in an illustrated translation of Buffon. But it remains to be proved that Mr. Colville was any better at natural history than his pupil. An ornithologist would surely have made some effort to induce his young friend to have so valuable a specimen preserved, but it is evident that Mr. Colville did nothing of the kind. By Mr. Ussher's courtesy, we are enabled to add to the known facts of the bird's story the following details, communicated by Sir W. Russell in a letter dated December 24th, 1897 : — Dear Sir, — You ask me what I did with the bird which is causa causans of our correspondence, and my answer is that probably we ate him. I am sure I did not send it to the Trinity College Museum. I did not enter Trinity till 1838-9. My trophies of the chase were usually handed over to the cook, and all I can remember about Alauda cristata I have already imparted to you.— Yours, &c., W. H. RusSi;i«if. I900.] Moffat. — The Birds of Ireland. 257 That the famous bird was actually cooked and eaten does not, we repeat, say much for Mr. Colville as an ornithologist ; and when we remember the numerous errors as to Irish birds which have been set right by re-examination of specimens long after they had been killed, it seems peculiarly unfortunate to have a new departure made in the direction of accepting a species so unsatisfactorily vouched for. Mr. Ussher has himself played an important part in securing the rectification of erroneous records of the Nightingale, Montagu's Harrier, King-Bider, and Hooded Merganser, which, prima facie, had much higher authority in their favour than can be claimed for the Crested I^ark. The figure in the Penny Joufnal would appear from Sir W. Russell's language to have been a copy of that in the edition of Buffon to which he refers, and therefore is. of little importance; and apart from that figure there is literally no authority at all for the bird, against whose inclusion in the Irish list we earnestly protest. We will not dwell at any length on the question of the L,esser Spotted Woodpecker's claims to retention among our birds, but we believe the time has arrived when it ought to be ** turned out." No specimen exists, though Glennon the bird- stuffer stated to Watters that " six or seven " had been sent him for preservation at different times. That so many should have been sent to one taxidermist, while no other evidence of the bird's occurrence in Ireland has been produced from that day to this, is simply incredible. Watters appears to have been shown two specimens in Glennon's shop, but in view of the bird-stuffer's manifestly unreliable statement about the " six or seven," we should be slow to accept his evidence as to where the two had been killed. Glennon's data were sometimes proved to be at fault, as in the instance of a certain Ruppell's Tern, which he palmed off as Irish by way of a "practical joke/' Under such circumstances, the present position of Dendrocopus nnnoroii our list is most unsatisfactory. It is just such a case as Appendices exist for dealing with, and to place it elsewhere is, in our humble opinion, to deprive the Appendix of all raison d'etre^ In conclusion, we would wish to remove a slight error which might mislead visitors to the Belfast Museum. Mr. Ussher states, on Mr. Barrington's authority, that the supposed 258 The Irish Naturalist. [November, Carrion Crow in that Museum is a Rook. This is only partly correct, for there is a true Irish-killed Co}V2is coroiie 2i\\\on% the specimens at Belfast, and that bird, which has full data, was seen and its identification confirmed by Mr. Barrington in August, 1897. Besides this example, there was a Rook erroneously labelled " Carrion Crow,'* as Mr. Barrington noted ; but as the latter bird had no data its identity is of comparatively little importance, and it does not deserve to be styled " the supposed Carrion Crow in the Belfast Museum.' The fact that two specimens were examined, and 07ie found to be wrongly labelled, will be found noted in the Irish Naturalist for 1898, p. 41. The volume on which Mr Usslier has expended so much pains is very handsomel}' bound and illustrated, and well printed. To Irish ornithologists it is a mine of information, and no naturalist's library ought to be without it. SPONGES, CORAI.S, AND JEI.I.YFISH, A Treatise on Zoolog^y. Edited by Prof. E. Ray Lankester, LL.D., F.R.S. Part II. The Porifera and Coelentera. By E. A. MiNCHiN, M.A., G. H. Fowi^ER, Ph.D., and G. C. Bourne, MA. London: Adam and Charles Black, 1900. Pp. vi. +37 + 178+81+84 +25. I5,y. net. Two divisions of Invertebrates, viz. : — the Porifera (sponges) and the Coelentera (corals, jellyfishes, &c.), are dealt with in the second part of the great new English treatise on Zoology referred to in the May number of the Irish Naturalist. Nearly half of the book is devoted to the sponges — a most difficult group, whose true position in the animal kingdom is to the present day a source of dispute among zoologists. While even a beginner can easil}' recognise a sponge among a variety of natural history specimens, the classification of the group presents the greatest difficulties. The principal divisions are still founded on the nature of the minute spicules which form the skeleton, though the old division into calcareous and non-calcareous sponges no longer holds good. Three classes of recent sponges are recognised by Prof. Minchin — the author of this portion of the work, viz.: — Calcarea, Hexactinellida, Demospougi^e. P'^roni the point of view of evolution ?nd morphology the Calcarea (sponges with calcareous spicules) are of special interest, so much so, indeed, that Prof Minchin deplores the powerful attraction which they offer to speculative intellects, a sad state of confusion in classification and nomenclature having resulted from overmuch theorizing. I900.] Sponges, C orals ^ and Jellyfish. 259 The question whether sponges are animals or plants has long ago been settled in favour of the former view. Their protozoan nature has been upheld by many zoologists, though the opinion that they belong to the Metazoa is now generally adopted among zoologists. It is, however, when we come to a further definition of their position in the system that modern authors are so much divided. Are sponges to be regarded as an independent phylum distinct from all the rest of the animals, or should they be placed in one of the existing sub-kingdoms ? Since the coelen- terate theory, according to Prof. Minchin, has become quite untenable, he rightly adopts the view so ably advocated b}' Sollas and Biitschli that sponges belong to a separate phylum, which probably originated from a choanoflagellate infusorian ancestor. It is to be regretted therefore that Mr. Bourne, in the sixth chapter (p. 4) again classes the Porifera among the Coelentera. The chapter on Enterocoela and Coelomocoela by Prof. Ray Lankester is particularly interesting. The term ccelom was originally applied to the body cavity in vertebrate animals. The same term is now extended to the cavity or organ in other groups of animals which may be consi- dered genetically identical with this primitive vertebrate pleuro- peritoneal cavity. As Prof. Lankester remarks, the presence of the ccelom is of the highest physiological importance. Hence all the Metazoa, except sponges, are divided into those in which the sole cavity is the enteron — the Enteroccela— and those in which the ccelom is pre- sent as an independent second cavity — the Coelomocoela. The author then enumerates the phyla included in these two grades, their chief organs and organ-systems and discusses the various theories connected with the ccelom in a strikingly novel and attractive manner. The chapter on the Hydromedusse and the Scyphomedusae, which contain the jelly-fishes and their allies, has been very ably written by Dr. Fowler. The illustrations, many of them new, are throughout the book excellent, though some of the diagrams might with advantage have been printed in different tints, as has been done by Delage and Herouard in their great French work on zoology. Finally, Mr. Bourne deals with the Anthozoa and the Ctenophora. The apparently aberrant group containing Ctenoplana and Cceloplana which was supposed to connect the ctenopho^es with the planarian worms, are now classed among the former under the order Platyctenae. Until the development of these peculiar forms have been studied, they give us no further clue as to the suggested relationship of Platyhelminthes and Ctenophora. The volume (Part II.) now before us quite sustains the high standard of excellence which characterizes its predecessor, and justifies in every sense the opinion already expressed in this Journal. R. F. S. A3 26o The Iiish Natuialist. [November, NOTES ON THE LIMERICK FLORA, BY R. LLOYD PRAEGKR, B-E Several discoveries of high botanical interest have recently been made by members of the Limerick Field Club ; and as I had an opportunity of studying the plants in question in situ during three da^'S spent in that count}' in August last, I have combined these records with others which appear worthy of publication, and thrown the whole into narrative form. That these notes did not appear earlier is solely d!ue to the time required for working out the identity, distribution, and standing of one or two of the most important plants recorded. The flora of Co. Limerick has never been systematically investigated; a glance at " C3^bele Hibernica" reveals a great paucit}^ of records from that county. Recentl}^ (1897) the Field Club commenced the formation of a herbarium repre- senting the flora of Limerick and Clare; and in 1899 Mr. A. Somerville, B.Sc, mostly kindly spent a week in working up a Limerick list for "Irish Topographical Botany." Never- theless further work appeared necessar>% and with this object in view I reached Limerick on the evening of August 14th. The flora of the county turned out unexpectedly rich. Over 500 species were listed in three da3^s, and this without tapping the maritime flora of the Shannon estuary, which, as Mr. Stewart has shown, ^ is tolerablj^ extensive. From the brief glance at the flora which I had, I augur for Co. Limerick a big total when its botany is w^orked out, and the addition of some further rarities as interesting as those which it will be my pleasure to record. Just before leaving home. Miss Knowles informed me of the finding a few days before of Rnmex rna^dtimics, one of the rarest Irish plants, b}- Rev. Canon O'Brien at Lough Gur, one of the few lakes of Limerick, lying in the centre of the county. On arrival at Limerick, it was with much satisfaction that I examined the specimen at the house of ni}' hosts, the Doctors Fogert}', and found that Mr. R. D. O'Brien's diagnosis was undoubtedly correct. We decided to spend the first da}' at Lough Gur, and next morning Dr. George Fogerty, Mr. R. D. ^ Stewart : Report on the Botany of South Clare and the Shannon. Proc. R.LA. (3) I., 1890. I900-] Praeger. — Notes on the l^hncrick Flora. 261 O'Brien and I drove twelve miles to that favoured spot, long famous for the Irish Elk skeletons and prehistoric remains that it has yielded. Only two plants of R. maritivius had been seen by Canon O'Brien, and I feared the plant might prove to be merely sporadic, but to our great satisfaction we at once found it, growing in profusion about the boat-house under Grange Hill, and saw it later at several other points round the lake, so that its claim to native rank cannot be questioned. Previous Irish records sum up as follows :— Kilcoleman, Co. Cork — Carroll (prior to 1872, not seen since?); Lady's Island Lake, Co. Wexford, 1883 — Hart; Garristown, Co. Dublin — Ogilby and Moore (last seen in 1883, now extinct?). The discovery of a new station is therefore eminently satisfactory. While gathering R. inaritinius my eye fell on Ceratophyllum demersuni, growing in the shallow water by the lake edge, and later it turned up choking, in its immense luxuriance, a broad drain near the old castle at the north-east end of the lake. This was a most welcome find, the plant being local and rare, and unrecorded from District VI. Nor were the rarities of Lough Gur yet exhausted, for at a number of places round the lake margin T gathered Nastttrtiiim sylvestre, hitherto unknown in this part of Ireland, being confined to four rivers in the south- east, and one (Erne) in the north-west. Chejiopodium rubru7tt was also a welcome find, growing among both species of Bide7is, which fringe the lake in great profusion, and Ranunculus circi7iatus was fished out of the water. We sampled one of the rocky limestone hills which rise about the lake. ChcErophylkim temulum was the best plant found. The site of a former lake adjoining Lough Gur on the south-east, now largely swamp and bog-hole, yielded Leni7ia polyrhiza, stated by Harvey to be common about Limerick (" Flor. Hib.", 1836), but apparently not seen since ; also Car ex teretiuscula. The clear spring-fed bog-holes here, filled with CharacecB, were a pleasant change from the dirty pea-soup-coloured waters of Lough Gur. I pushed on to a worked-out bog, full of deep holes, lying south of the lake. The pools 3delded a fine haul of CharacecB^ including C. polyacantha, also Potamogeton coloratus, P. obtusifolius, Sparganium minhnum, and other additions to the Limerick flora. We drove back to Limerick delighted with our day's work. 262 The Irish Naturalist. [November, Previous investigation having been almost confined to the limestone, we made for the Old Red Sandstone uplands of Slieve Felim the following morning. As on the previous day, the roadsides for miles were ga}^ with the white umbels oi Pimpinella viagna. A halt at a roadside quarry-hole yielded Le^mia polyrhiza again. Beyond Cappamore w^e (Dr. G. Fogerty, Mr. O'Brien and I) alighted, and worked across the remains of a large bog, now almost entirely demolished. The typical bog- flora had nowhere survived the draining and cutting ; Os7nu7ida and Lastrea spinulosa were the best plants seen. Dr. Fogerty and Mr. O'Brien have since explored the less plundered bogs at Castleconnell, and filled a number of blanks in the I^imerick list, for bogs are almost absent in that county. After lunch at Doon, we struck in among the hills, working chiefl}- up the fine glen of the Bilboa river. Satisfactory results were achieved in the addition of a large number of calcifuge plants to the list, though most of them possessed no special interest : the best plants found were Rubus saxatilis, Agrimonia odorata (new to VI.), Ca7xx pendtda, Lastrea Oreopteris, L. cBviula. On our long drive home Fest^ica Myuros was gathered near Cappamore. Next morning before breakfast Mr. O'Brien took me to see in situ the best of all the Limerick plants — Scirpus t^iqueter, which he had found only a few days before. As a British species this is extremel}^ rare. It is confined to the tidal reaches of the Thames, the Arun in Sussex, and the Tamar, which separates Devon from Cornwall. And here, on the muddy forevShore just below lyimerick Docks, Mr. O'Brien showed me the plant growing abundantly. The proximity to the shipping suggested the possibility of introduction ; but Mr. O'Brien has set this point at rest by a series of explorations which show that it grows profusely on both banks of the Shannon for about five miles below Limerick, nor is the extent of its range yet fully defined. The discoverer had better be allowed to speak for himself: — **I took a boat and dropped down the river about five miles. There can be no doubt, I think, that it is native ; it grows by the rood together, like grass, on both sides. I traced it down as far as the bottom of Tervoe reach on the Limerick shore, That may be its limit, as the water gets rougher there, but I expect to find it in the I900.1 Praeger. — Notes 071 the Limerick Flora. 263 Maigue and Bunratty River" (3i-8-'oo). " I went on Tuesday to Cratloe Creek on the Shannon (Clare side), but did not find Scirpus triqucter \n the main river; there was one clump in the Creek . . On Wednesday I went to Newtown, which is opposite Cratloe on the lyimerick shore. There I could not find kS. triqueter at all. You will understand that the river is very difficult to reach either by land or water, so that no thorough search is possible ; but I think you may take it that abundant growth of the plant ceases at Coonagh lower light, and the point opposite where the river widens — that is, it is in Tervoe reach and no further" (y-g-'oo.) It is impossible to refuse the plant a place in the indigenous list, and the finder is to be congratulated on making one of the most interesting additions of recent years to the Irish flora. We gathered good specimens of it, and growing hard by I was much pleased to find Nasturtiimi sylvestre again. Thence to waste ground adjoining the docks, where Mr. O'Brien had an interesting lot of colonists to show, among which Lepidiiivi latifolium andZ. Draba were well established, and, according to him, spreading. Then across Carey's Road to a large disused quarry, now being filled up with rubbish, where a truly remarkable assemblage of aliens was to be seen. There were all kinds of plants here: — half-native plants which hang about towns and waste ground, such as Brassica nigra^ Lepidiiim latifolium, A^epeta Cataria, Cheyio- podium murale ; colonists like Lcpidium Draba and Melilotus arvensis^ Wallr. ; confirmed casuals, such as Saponaria Vaccaria, Malva parvi flora, Melilotus alba, M. pay vi flora, Medicago falcata, Ceyitaitrea solstitialis, Caiinabis saliva ; English plants which do not extend to Ireland, such as Lythrum hyssopifolia, Centaurca Calcitrapa, Lactuca virosa, and Polypogon vi07ispeliensis ; plants of Southern Europe, like Nasturtium austriaciwi, Lepidium virgiiiicum, Gren. et Godr. { = L. majus, Darracq), Polyg07iuvi Bellardi, Aspkodehis fistulosus (the second a very rare plant, growing only at Bayonne) ; North American species, such as Ambivsia artemisicefolia and the lovely grass Paiiicum capillare ; and garden outcasts of various sorts, down to vegetable marrows and Virginian creepers.^ ^ My best thauks are due to Mr. K. G. Baker, of the British Museum, for kind assistance in naming these foreign plants. 264 The Irish Natitralist. [November, The morning train (save the mark !) conveyed Mr. O'Brien and myself to Askeaton, a straggling village on a small tidal stream with rocky limestone banks, and decorated with beautiful ruins. The flora here is striking : many of the plants are recorded in Mr. Stewart's report already referred to. A conspicuous group of doubtful!}' native plants first arrests the e3'e — Fccniculum^ Verbena, Malva sylvestris, Silybum ; with them some native species, such as Salvia Verbcnaca and Dipsacus. On the abbey ruins I was delighted to recognise Ezcphrasia Salisbtcrgensis, hitherto in the British Isles on record from Clare, Galwa}^ and Mayo onl}^, though I have it also from Leitrim. Along the rocky banks of the river this Kyebright appeared again abundantl)^, growing as usual in dense clusters on bare patches of soil or on little eminences. The river-banks were full of good plants, such as Corjins sanguinca, Calamintha officinalis, Spiranthes autuninalis, Allium vineale, Viola hirla, Gerajiinni colunibinum, Rubia, the first four not in Mr. Stewart's list ; neither is Feshcca Myicros, which grew on old walls with Oroba7iche Hederce. Papaver hybridtun, growing on the roadside, furnished another addition to the Limerick list. Mr. O'Brien next took me to MuUagh, where there is a considerable area of bare limestone crag, most tempting to the eye. A wet marsh which I waded here was tenanted by Cladium, Jtmcus obiusijlorus, Ubicularia vulgaris and minor, Potamogeto7i colorahis, and Chara polyacantha, most of them wanted for Limerick. The flora of the crags proved characteristic, though curiously restricted. The thickets consisted chiefly of Hazel and Dogwood — no Buckthorn ; the herbaceous flora of Viola hirla, Poterium Sanguisorba, Carli7ia vulgaris, Euphrasia Salisb2irgensis, all in immense abundance. On such ground it was most strange to see no Ger-anium sangtiine^cm , Asperula cynanchica, Seslefia, or the other rarer plants which one associates with the West of Ireland lime- stones. Geraniicm columbinuyn w^as here again, unquestionably native, and Rubies saxatilis. A nine-mile drive brought us finally to Curragh Chase, where we were joined by Canon O'Brien. This ground was visited also by Mr. Somerville last year, and ii will well stand further working. We added to its flora Neollia Nidus-avis and Carex Pseudo-cyperus, and in particular I was glad to find Hypopithys Monoiropa, one of our rarest Irish plants, dis- I900.] Prakgkr. — Notes on the Limerick Flora. 265 covered here by Dr. George Fogert}- in 1897, but looked for in vain since. We enjoyed Canon O'Brien's hospitality that evening, and returned to lyimerick by the night mail. Early next morning Dr. G. Fogerty took me to another quarry, adjoining the railwa}', where a number of strange casuals were to be found, but the rich list of the Carey's Road quarry practicall}^ covered the ground. I caught the midday train to Dublin, and the detecting of Linaria viscida, Diplotaxis imcralis, and Arcnaria temiifolia on the railway at Killonan finished for a time my botanizing in I^imerick. RECENT I.ITERATURE. The Fauna and Flora of Valencia Harbour on the West Coast of Ireland [Proc. Royal Irish Acad., 3rd sen, vol. v., 1900.) In the spring of 1895. Mr. W. I. Beaumont, Mr. E. T. Browne, and Mr. F. W. Gamble visited Valencia HarlDour for the purpose of investigating certain groups of marine invertebrates — " Medusse, Turbellaria, Nemertea, and Nudibranchiata — which groups had received ver)' little attention from previous workers on the west coast of Ireland." Their efforts were so successful that in 1896 they again visited Valencia, and were accompanied this time b}^ three additional naturalists, viz., Prof F. F. Weiss, Mr. M. D. Hill, and Mr. A. O. Walker. This valuable paper gives an account of the results obtained in these two visits, and of a series of tow-nettings taken from October, 1896, to December, 1898, by the Misses Delap, of Valencia. The various groups of animals collected and the Algae have been examined, and reports drawn up by competent authorities. Perhaps the most interesting of these reports is that on the Medusae by Mr. Browne, who remarks that the medusoid fauna of Valencia Harbour is now better known than that of any other locality in the British area, and gives figures of the radial canal system of that interesting Medusa, Dipleurosotna iypicum, Boeck. A large number of species are recorded which are new to the Irish Fauna, and two species new I0 science are described, viz., Obelia wz^ra (from the Medusa form), by Mr. Browne, and an unnamed species o{ Luc em aria, of \^llich Mr. Beaumont promises us shortly a more detailed description. The few references to the previously known dis- tribution of the species on the Irish coast are not^ however, always quite accurate. Litcernaria cainpanulata, stated not to have been previously re- corded from the coast of Ireland, happens to have been recorded from Bray, Miltown-Malbay, and the west coast in Thompson's Natural History of Ireland, and from Kerry by Dr. F- P. Wright in Proc. Dublin Univ. Zool. and Bot. Assoc, vol. i. Idalia Leachii, which " does not appear to have been recorded from Ireland," i§ mentioned by Mr. i\.lder in Jeffreys' '' British Conchology'' as having been found in Birterbuy Bay b)- Mr. Barlee. A. R. N. 266 The Irish Natiwalist. [November, A List Of the lYIarlne IVIollusca of Ireland. B} A. R. NichoIvS, R.A. (Report from the Fauna and Flora Committee). Proc. R. I. Academy (3\ v. No. 4. 1900. The publication of Mr. Nichols's list of Irish Marine Mollusca marks another stepin the advance of our knowledge of the Irish fauna, and supplies an implement which will be most useful to those of the craft — students of either zoologj- or palaeontology. The records of Irish mollusca were brought together by Thompson in 1856, but the numerous papers and notes published in the intervening forty-four years were uncatalogued, and scattered through many Journals, and Proceedings of scientific societies. The recent publication of the important results of the Royal Irish Academy's dredging expeditions made it especially desirable that the whole of the literature should be brought together and. condensed into one systematic paper, and this Mr. Nichols has done for us. For the purposes of showing distribution, Mr. Nichols has divided the Irish coast into six provinces, while he has adopted 1,000 fathoms as the bathymetrical limit of the Irish fauna. The submerged Ireland beyond the 100 fathom line thus added to our jurisdiction is larger than the island itself, extending far beyond the Porcupine Bank. One of the best features of the paper is its excellent bibliography of Irish mollusca. The nomenclature will horrify those who still use their Jeffreys, or Forbes and Hanley, but the numerous changes in the names of our molluscau favourites are necessar}' in order to bring us into line with the general advance of conchology. Mr. Nichols has mercifully- added in brackets the familiar names of JefTreys's " British Conchology " where these differ from the names now employed. R. Ivi.. P. A sug^gestlon as to a possible mode of ortg^In of some of the Secondary Sexual Characters in Animals as afforded by observations on certain Salmonoids. By G. E. H. BARRETT-HAMII.TON, Proc, Cambridge Phil. Soc.,^o\. x.,1900. In a short paper Mr. Barrett-Hamilton discusses some of the current views as to the changes of colour or form which the males of many vertebrates undergo during the breeding season. He believes that there must be some fundamental cause to which all such cases owe their origin. Having had an opportunity of making observations on Salmon in the rivers of Kamchatka, he maintains that the abnormal coloration and growth during the breeding time are due to pathological conditions by which both sexes are affected. Mr. Barrett-Hamilton suggests that we have in these phenomena a possible source and origin of many of the highly developed sexual characters met with in other animals, and that they may possibly be reminiscences of a former condition of things through which their ancestors passed. R. F. S- 1900.] 26'] PROCEEDINGS OF IRISH SOCIETIES. RoYAi, ZooT^oGiCAiv Society. Recent gifts include an Otter from Mrs. Howard St. George, a Cockatoo from Mr. H. M. Winder, a Willow- Warbler from Mr. Bushe, a number of Carp and Trout from the Commissioners of Irish Inland Fisheries, fifty American Brook Trout and fifty Lochheven Trout from Mr. J. N. Lentaigne. A pair of Lories have been bought. 13,962 persons visited the Gardens during September. BeivFast Naturalists' Fiki^d Ci^ub. September 8. — The last field meeting was held. The excursion in- cluded the ancient rath or tumulus at Dundonald, the Kemp stone cromlech, Newtownards Priory and Grey Abbey. A numerous gathering of members and friends were favoured with fine weather. Mediaeval architecture seemfed to be the chief object of quest, and the ancient Priory at Newtownards was first visited and critically examined, after which the ruins of the abbey — De jiigo Dei — in the Ards, were investigated. Mr. J. J. Phillips (author of an illustrated monograph on the abbey) having kindly consented to act as cicerone to the Club in this part of the day's programme, briefly explained the plan of the abbey, commencing at the church. Dubinin Naturai^ists' Field Club. August 4. — A small party of members and visitors attended the ex- cursion to the Scalp. The party travelled to Carrickmines Railway Station by train, and walked from this point to the Scalp by the footpath over the hill. A considerable number of botanical specimens were ob- tained, the road near the station proving the best hunting ground. September i. — The excursion to the North Bull was also botanical in character. Siueda /nariiima and Salkoniia herbacea were found in consider- able quantity along the shore. The range of Artemisia stelleriana has considerabl}- extended since the last visit of the Club, and Statice spathidata was found growing in great abundance on the marshy land near the rifle ranges. vSepTEMBER 19. — The last excursion, as usual, took the form of a Fungus Foray, the localit}- chosen being Lord Massey's pretty demesne of Killakee, to which he kindly gave free admission to the Club. Although the afternoon was fine the attendance was not as good as could be wished, only 14 members and visitors being present. The cold and wet of the earlier portion of the autumn seemed to have had a prejudicial effect on the growth of Fungi, as the larger forms — Agarics, Boleti, &c.— were by no means numerous. Nevertheless a number of interesting things were met with, the best find being, perhaps, Peziza {Otidea) otwtica. Amongst others, the following were identified by the President (Mr. Greenwood Pim) ; — Arniillaria melka, Clitocybe laccata, C. inftuidibuli/ormis, C. fragrans, Tricholoma rutilans^ Collybia confluens, Mycena, one or two species ; Pholiota 268 The Irish Naturalist* [November, sqiiarrosa, Hebclonia rintosum, H. gcophyUuni^ llypJioloma fasciculatii/n, Psathy- rdla disseminata, Coprinns coniatns, Kussula, species ; Lactariiis blenniiis, L. piperaius, L. hysginiis, Boletus Intciis, Clavaria nigosa, Corticium lave, Selerodernia vulgare^ Lycopcnlon Ciclaiiiiii, L. pyrifoniie. Phallus inipudieus, Peziza (Otidea) o/iotiea, P. (Coe/ileata) auranlia, P. {Scutellinia) sculellata, Uncinula biconiis, Xylaria Iiypoxylon, Trochila lauro-cerasi. Myxoiiiycetes were fairly abuudaut, Lycogala epidendru/n, Didyi/iiu/u farinaceum, Areyria punieea, and an undeveloped Triehia being noted. Cork NaturaIvISTs' Fiei^d Ci,ub. Skptkmbkr 19- — Excursion to Bi.ackrock. — The party walked along the shore by Lough Mahon, and the following plants were collected: — Plantago Coronopus, Salieoniia herbacea, Sutcda inaritii/ia, Stat ice spathulata, and Aster tripolium, some specimens of which had the outer florets pure white. NOTKS, BOTANY. FUNGI, TrulTles In Ireland. An interesting discovery has recently been made in County Galway bj' Major Klmitt, F.R.G.S., of Carrickfergus. Major Elmitt, who is a well, known figure in scientific circles, was for a long time certain that truffles ought to exist in the Western counties, and after juuch trouble and research he succeeded in discovering some in a wild and thinly- populated part of Galway. The next step, obviously, is to teach the Galway pig to hunt for truffles. All who are acquainted with the lean, high-backed, sharp-nosed, active '• Old Irish " pig will agree that it is eminently fitted for the purpose. — Belfast News- Letter. MOSSES. lYIoss Exchange Clult). We have received from the Secretary (Rev. C. H. Waddell) *• Reports and Extracts from the Club Note Books for the years 1S99, 1900," recently issued by the Moss Exchange Club ; also List of Desiderata for 1 901, List of British Sphagna, and Rules. From the reports the Club would seem to be in a flourishing condition. The membership is not large — between 30 and 40— but plenty of activity is manifested, as shown by the fact that in the two years over 5,000 specimens were sent in and distributed. Irish plants have been kept well to the front by Rev. H. W. Lett and Rev. C. H. Waddell. I900.J Notes. 269 PHANEROGAMS. Elymus arenarius in Co. Dublin. While walking south along the railway from Killiney on the 29th September last I unexpectedly came across an abundant growth of this handsome grass in a new locality, about a quarter of a mile north of the Bray river. At this point the line closely skirts the shore, passing along the summit of a drift bank which falls steeply to the sea. Along the edge of this bank, right beside the permanent waj^, the grass spreads for fully 100 3^ards in a luxuriant growth, many of the plants reaching to fully 5 feet in height, with the characteristic flat leaves in some cases I inch wide. Though mostly quite past flowering, here and there a plant appeared in second flower with spikes up to 10 inches in length. The usual habitat of the species; in the British Isles at least, is sandy sea-shores ; here it flourished in rather tenacious drift material of clay and gravel, and in one spot some plants have pushed their way through the joints of the granite facing of the embankment. All the appearances are in favour of this conspicuous species having been long established in this station, and it is certainly remarkable that it should have so long escaped discovery at a point where passenger trains pass almost half- hourly and at a slow rate all the year round. The claim of Elymus arenarius, apparently a rare plant in Ireland, to a place in the Count}* Dublin flora luis hitherto rested on Mr. Hart's record for Skerries, dating from 1S83, The plant still grows there, but much more sparingly than in the station just recorded. N. Coi^GAN. Dublin. The march of Matricaria cliscoidea. In the September number of the Irish Naturalist Mr. Colgan and Mr. Praeger put on record the presence of this floral invader in a number of the Irish counties. j\Ir. Praeger tells us that the invasion of Ulster by this alien is now fairly begun, and the burden of my present message is that the invasion is still progressing. That active member of the Botanical Section of the Belfast Naturalists' Field Club, Mr. Richard Hauna, has shown me a specimen gathered by him, last August, by the "ailway line between Lurgan and Portadown. This occurrence adds Armagh to the list of counties already enumerated. S. A. Stewart. Belfast. Poa compressa again. This long neglected Irish grass has been found in still another locality, Mr. Richard Hanua, of Belfast, having gathered it, early in September, on an old wall near Doagh, County Antrim. S. A. Stewart. Belfast. ^70 The Irish Naturalist. [November, ZOOLOGY. Naturalists in Sligro. Two well known members of the Conchological Society, Dr. Chaster of Southport, and Mr. Collier of Manchester, have had a most successful ten days' collecting tour in the northern Lake District, in company with Messrs. Bigger, Stelfox, and Welch of the B.N.F.C., visiting Lower Lough Erne and its islands, the district south of Lough Macnean, Lough Gill, Glencar, and Inishmurry. The return home was made via Bundoran to visit the dunes where so many reversed, &c., Helices have been found, and with some success, Dr. Chaster finding one living specimen. INSECTS. A Braconid parasitic on Anobium domestlcum. Some time ago these beetles {Anobiuni) attacked the pedestal of a valuable table. I then applied carbolic acid and hoped to have stopped the mischief. Last year Mrs. Johnson informed me that the attack had recommenced, and brought me a small Ichneumon fly which she had found running about the table and which she was inclined to partly blame for the harm done. Last month she again drew my attention to the presence of these Pymenoptera, and having captured some specimens I sent them to Mr. E. Saunders who kindly forwarded them to Mr. Claude Morley, and he pronounces the insect to be Spathiiis exarator^ L. Anobium domesticum is a small brown beetle which bores into wood, making little holes like shot holes. The beetle and its larva feed on the wood, and in course of time quite destroy it, eating away the solid substance and leaving a residuum of dust. In old houses they are often far too plentiful, and at times do much injury to woodwork and furniture. The beetle is one of the Death-watch tribe, the noise which it makes being supposed to be caused by its tapping with its head as a signal to its mate. It is very pleasing to know that so destructive an insect has a natural enemy in this Braconid, and I should recommend all householders when they observe a little fly, with what would be taken for a long and vicious- looking sting, hovering about a room, not to assault it with the poker or a slipper, but to allow it to pursue unmolested its appointed task of reducing the numbers oi Anobium. W. F. Johnson. Poyntzpass. Vanessa lo in Co. Londonderry. With reference to Miss Campbell's capture of the Peacock butterfly ( Vanessa io) near Londonderry {supra, p. 246), I may mention having seen one many years ago at Kilderry in the same neighbourhood. I made a note of the occurrence at the time, but am unable now to lay my hand upon it. „^ _ ^^ ^ W. E. Hart. Howth. I900,] Notes. 271 Noteworthy Irish Lepldoptera. I have been notified of the occurrence of the Death's-head Moth, Acherontia atropos, either in the imaginal or larval condition, from various parts of the country- this year, both in the Co. Cork, at Kells in Meath, and in this county of Monaghan, a full fed caterpillar having been brought to me so late as the 22nd September. Also it is interesting to find that Va?iessa io, the beautiful Peacock butterfly, usually very rareh' seen in the northern half of Ireland, has this year appeared in some numbers in this demesne ; and also, I find from a correspondent, at Newry. I wish also to record the capture by Mr. R. Donovan of Cucullia absynthii flying to the blossoms of a lime tree this summer, near Timo- league, and from the same neighbourhood Eupithecia pygmcBaia, E. coHstridata, and E. togata, all good finds. Wm. F. de V, Kank. Drumreaske, Monaghan. MOLLUSCS. Scalarlform Helix nemoralls living at Bundoran. A very interesting article, it may be remembered, appeared in the Lrish Naturalist of July, 1900, dealing with the abnormal shells of Helix nemoralis, by Mr. R. Welch, of Belfast, who for many years has devoted much time and care to the study of that variable shell. The sinistral and scalariform shells were particularly referred to, also the abundance with which these occur at Bundoran in comparison with the rest of the United Kingdom. Still, although a large number of the shells, particularly the t3'pe form, run into van conica, it is the exception to find a true scalariform specimen. Those which have been obtained up to the present, as Mr. Welch remarks, have usually been found among the hollows of the great wind-swept sand-dunes, in all cases empt}', and usually with the epedermis weathered off. Last September, however, I was fortunate enough to find a perfect full-grown specimen living I had been searching close by the entrance to the dunes, a little beyond the Fairy Bridges, in a spot where my wife remarked that var. conica seemed very abundant, when I picked it up feeding on the short scrub which carpets the turf just below the sand-hills. On the theory that this monstrosity, being only a still further production of the variety (conica'), would be most likely to occur again where the variety was most plenti- ful, I spent another morning about the same spot, and was rewarded by finding a second scalariform, this time, however, dead, within about ten yards of the place where I found the first. Though slightly weathered, the epidermis was still perfect enough to lead one to conclude that the animal had been recently living. Both shells were an abnormal production of the ordinary five-banded type, and I would not be sur- prised if careful searching turned up a few more about the same place. Wm. a. Green. Belfast. 272 The Irish Natiiynlist. [November, BIRDS. The Ruff in Ireland. It gives me the greatest possible pleasure to see in the pages of the {Irish Natufalist {supra p. 247), ]\Ir. Ussher's remarks ou m}' recent paper on the Natural Histor)' of the Ruff. I am ouly too glad to learn more of the subject in question from my brother ornithologists, and one of my chief objects in contributing articles to the Irish Natiiralist has been to invoke discussion, enough of which it is a regrettable circumstance seldom arises. Mr. Ussher suggests that " the discontinuance of shooting in spring" may account for more recent absence of records at that time of year. This is true as far as records made from shot specimens are concerned, but if the Ruff during more recent years has been protected in spring its numbers as a vernal migrant should have tended to increase rather than diminish, and it at least should have been seen (c/en if not shot) by competent observers looking out for it, and yet we hear of no such observations for many years past. I am aware that it is often necessary to shoot a bird to identify it, but the Ruff in nuptial plumage is so conspicuous that a good observer with a field-glass should be able to satisfy himself as to its identit}' without at all times securing the specimen. Is it not likely that the decrease of Ruffs in spring in Ireland has accompanied a similar decrease in England, as we know that in the latter countr)- the Ruff is now seldom observed, even as a vernal migrant and in counties where it formerly bred ? According to IMr. vSaunders, drainage has greatly restricted the haunts of the Ruff. I certainl}' agree with Mr. I'ssher's idea that the spread of interest in ornitholog}' may go towards accounting for thegreater number of records of the Ruff from the western part of Ireland, but in addition it is worth noting that during Mr. Warren's residence for many years in Killala he did not obtain a specimen till 1S84, and that from Sligo. Since then several RulTs were taken in Connaught (as tabulated in my article), and I am not aware that these birds were shot by people very specially interested in the science of ornithology, but rather b}- sportsmen looking for grouse and such like. Lastly, Mr. Ussher says he cannot concur with my remark that sports- men, as a rule, are keen observers, and hence few strange birds pass them unnoticed. I do not mean that sportsmen are at all accurate observer. They often shoot a species because they do not know what it is. In this way we are indebted to them for many records of more or less rare birds, sometimes really rare ones. I know a gentleman who some short time ago shot a Squacco Heron. He said he shot it because he did not know what it was. He was, to my mind, a keen observer, because he saw the bird, but not an accurate observer, as he did not know it. I have received examples of Water Rails, Nightjars, Short- eared Owls, and other species detected by the sharp eye of the sportsman, and shot birds which an ordinary observers might altogether overlook. Are we not indebted to sportsmen for sending to our markets rare Ijirds from time to time, which subsequently igoo.] Notes, 273 have been secured and identified by scientific ornithologists ? I conclude by thanking Mr. Ussher for the interest he has taken in discussing the subject. Charters J. Pattkn, Trinity College, Dublin. CoiYiinon Bittern in Co. Down. On Thursda)', 9th August, 1900, a Common Bittern {^Botavrits sfel/aris), was shot at Groomsport, by Mr. Walter Smyth, while he was walking along the sea-shore, Belfast. Robert Pattrrson. Early arrival of Redwing. When on abog near Coagh, Co. Tyrone, on 2nd October, three Red- wings {Tiirdiis iliacus) flew past me. They were flying low, in a south - westerl)' direction, and were fairly close to me. Belfast. Robert Patterson. MAMMALS. The Vision of Whales. Mr. John Brown's allusion in the October number of the Irish Naturalist to my communication on the local Cetacea, which appeared in the August number, has re-directed my attention to this subject. In con- versation about it this morning with Mr. Wm, Crawford, of Craigavad, who has had many opportunities, when sailing and fishing in this lough, of observing its inhabitants, he expressed the very decided opinion that whales could see above water. Many j^ears ago, before the lough was as disturbed as it now is by steamers, the whales were, if not more numerous, at least more approachable ; and Mr. Crawford said he has often seen them, fifty or sixty feet long, lying quiet, not more than fifteen to twenty yards off"; and he added, " we were sure the beggars were looking at us " Among my books the only reference I have yet found to whales looking about them is in one of the prize essays sent in to the International Fisheries Exhibition at Edinburgh in 1882 (Black- wood and Sons,Edinburgh, 1883, p. 7.) The essay in question, on " Whale fishing in the Faroe Isles," was contributed by Sysselmand H. C. Miiller, of Thorshaven, and in it he states, with reference to the pursuit and capture of a herd of Pilot Whales, ** Now and then some of the M'hales stand erect in the water, with their heads above the surface, seeming to spy." I am aware that neither of these statements answers the scientific part of the question raised by Mr. Brown, and I should welcome further information on the subject. Meantime we know that seals, which lead an amphibious life, must be able to adapt their eyes to seeing both above and below water. I watched a seal for quite a long time a couple of days ago offCultra Point, half a mile from here, and each time it rose its head was projected a foot or more above the surface, and it turned looking round it in all directions, sometimes showing the dark back of the head, and again the lighter fawn colour of the throat. Holywood. R. Lr^OYD PaTTERSOX. 274 '^^^^ hish Naturalist, [November, 1900. MAMMALS. Natterer's Bat In Co. Antrim. Ou July 24th, 1900, 1 received from my friend, Mr. H. L. Orr, a Natterer's Bat {Vesperli/ip Nattereri, Kulil.)- It was captured at Woodburu Gleu, near Carrickfergus, Co. Antrim, and I believe is the first recorded in this county. Robert Patterson. Belfast. GEOLOGY. Irish Fossils. Two important monographs, dealing, the one partly, the other wholly, with Irish fossil mollusca, progress in the publications of the Palaeonto- graphical Societ)-. In vol. liii. (For 1899) Dr. Wheelton Hinde's " British Carboniferous Lamellibranchiata " reaches its fourth part, the families treated of being the Edmondida, Cyprinida, and Crassitellidce. To this volume Dr. Foord has not been able to contribute the third part of his " Carboniferous Cephalopoda of Ireland." The last published instalment of this important work will be found in vol. Hi., and deals with the straight and curved Orthoceras-Vi^^ forms. The foramlnlferal deposits of Dog's Bay, Co. Galway. An important paper on " Mechanically-formed Limestones from Junagarh (Kathiawar) and other Localities," by Dr. J. W. Evans, F.G.S., appears in the Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, vol. Ivi., pp. 559-589 (August, T900). Junagarh is built thirty miles from the sea, on a limestone formed of small rounded grains, which are really *' organic calcareous particles derived from shallow- water organisms of recent types. Each particle is ordinarily surrounded by an envelope of deposited carbonate of lime." Dr. Evans, aided by Mr. F. Chapman's microscopic investigation of the organisms, concludes that the limestone has been formed by the action of wind, which has sifted out the smaller organisms and grains from a shore-deposit, and has carried them to form new beds inland. At that time (p. 573) Junagarh was probably close against the shore. Dr. Evans supports his argument by a careful description of the foraminiferal deposits of Dog's Bay on the south-west coast of Co. Galway (p. 576 ; see also Mr. Chapman's account, p. 588), drawn up from letters written by Mr. R. Welch, and from papers in the Irish Naturalist, vols, iv., vii., and ix. Mr. Welch's observations, which are always placed so freely at the disposal of other scientific workers, are fittingly enshrined in a paper of such wide geological application. Dr. Evans concludes b}' suggesting that some of our British oolitic deposits were similarl)- accumulated by aeolian action. G. A. J. Coi,E. Dublin. December, 1900.] 27«; THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE FOX FROM CO. ANTRIM. BY ROBERT PATTERSON, F.Z.S. By the kindness of the Earl of Antrim I have been permitted to examine an old " Court I^eet " Book for the Manor of Glenarm, and I have been much struck b}" the evidence therein of the great numbers oi Foxes that formerly existed in Co. Antrim. T-hinking that the information might be of interest to readers of the Irish Naturalist, I have been at some pains to decipher the faded — and often nearly illegible — writing,* and now give a summary of the results. The '' Manor of Glenarm " extended from the town of I^arne to Glendun River — practically what is known now as the Baronies of Upper and Eower Glenarm — a narrow strip on the extreme east of Co. Antrim, about 22 miles long b}^ about 6 miles average breadth. The Courts were held twice a year, in spring and autumn, and the records in this volume begin in 1765 and end in 1812. Passing over entries of purely antiquarian and ornithological interest, we come upon in- numerable records such as the following : — •^ 17th day of November, 1765. ** We psent the Sum of one pound four shills to be " Levyed ofif the inhabitants of the parish of Ardilenish and " paid to Daniel McVicar for killing twelve foxes of prey. ** We psent the Sum of one pound twelve shills to be " Levyed off the inhabitants of parish of Laid and paid to ** Daniel McVicar for killing sixteen foxes of prey. " We psent the Sum of two Shillings to be Eevyed off the " inhabitants of the parish of Carncastle and paid to Thomas *' Palmer for killing one old fox." Thus two shillings a head was the reward, whether the animal was a " fox of prey," or merely an '* old fox." 276 The hish Nahwalist. [December, The following is the number of Foxes "■ presented " and paid for in the different 3'ears : — 1765^ • 42 : P'oxes. 1766, . 51 1767* • 46 1768, . 57 1769, . • 52 i77o> • • 70 1771. • • 51 1772, . . 29 i773» • . 67 1774. 1775. 1776, 1777. 1778, i779> 1780, 1781, 53 Foxes. 46 4 54 22 76 32 26 1) ji )> ?> >> J5 V " ist day of May, 1782. We the Grand Jurj- of the Barony " of Glenarm are determined for the future not to allow any " money for killing foxes, as they are paid for at the Assizes, *' the Bailiffs are ordered to let this our Resolution be known ** to the Country." ** 14th day of Ma}^ 1783. As wee understant that the Grand " Jurey at last Assises would not pay for anny Foxes, now the ** Jurey of Glenarm means to Continue the Premium as formerly " and that the Bailifs should inform the Country of the same." 1783* • . 15 Foxes. 1786, . • . 34 Foxes 1784, . • 30 „ 1787, . • • 34 » i785> • • 43 J' 1788, . ■ • 7 .>. The sudden drop in numbers here seems to have been caused by a misunderstanding as to the responsibilit}^ for payment, for on 2nd May, 1792, we find the following: — " Whereas several people have lately been disappointed at " the Assizes in not getting any thing for Killing Foxes — " Resolved by the Grand Jury now present, That all persons " Killing Foxes in this Barony in future, on Presenting them " at the Courts I,eet as usual, will be paid an English Half " Crown for each." This seems to have had the desired effect, for at the next Court, only six mo7iths later, w^e find 57 Foxes were paid for ! 1793, . . .52 Foxes. I i794> • • -70 Foxes. After paying £% 155. for Foxes in one year, the Grand Jury must have thought the amount too large, for at the same Court, held on 12th November, 1794, we read: **We agree " only to Pay the sum of two shillings and two pence for Kach " fox and to be leyied of the Parrishes they are killed in." 1900]. Pattejrson. — Disappearajiceqf the FoxJro7nA7itrim. 277 The people resented this reduction by only producing 7 Foxes in 1795. 1796, . . 36 Foxes. 1805, . . 14 Foxes. 1797. • • 25 „ 1806, . • 30 » 1798, . • 21 „ 1807, . • 13 » 1799, . ■ 8 „ 1808, . • 5 » 1800, . 30 „ 1810, . • 20 „ I80I, . 31 » 181T, . . 26 „ 1802, . , 20 „ 1812, . . 23 „ 1803, . 33 >» Thus in forty-seven years we get the enormous total of 1,462 Foxes produced at the Courts I^eet for this small portion of Co. Antrim only, for which the " Manor of Glenarm " paid the sum of ;^i59 4.?. 6^. Coming to more recent years, Thompson in his *' Natural History of Ireland," vol. 4, page 12, says: ''The fox is still found in suitable localities throughout the island, wherever it can remain in spite of man." But he does not mention any occurrences in Co. Antrim, although he records the killing of 400 Foxes in Co. Down between 1827 and 185 1. The B.N.F.C. " Guide to Belfast," published in 1874, says Foxes " seem to be rapidly decreasing before the gamekeeper's gun and shepherd's trap." Lord Antrim informs me that the only Fox he ever heard of in the two Baronies was killed in his deer-park about the year 1870. It was running with a rabbit trap on one of its legs, and a wood- cutter killed it with a stick. The skin was preserved. Lord Antrim is convinced there is not now a single Fox in the two Baronies, nor has there been any since the 1870 capture. Even this one is supposed to have been " turned out" by the late Mr. Chaine, for hunting purposes. Mr. Sheals, the well-known Belfast taxidermist, informs me he cannot remember having received any Foxes from Co. Antrim. Finally, in the whole of Ulster there is not one pack of Fox- hounds, although there are two packs of Stag-hounds, and eleven packs of Harriers, to satisfy the hunting proclivities of the Northern gentry, who would doubtless hunt Foxes if there were any Foxes to hunt. Malone Park, Belfast. A 2 273 [December, SOME ADDITIONS TO THE BEETI^ES OF THE DUBININ DISTRICT. BY J. N. HAI^BERT. During the last five years a good deal of additional information has been acquired concerning the beetle fauna of the Dublin and Wicklow district. Quite a number of rare and unrecorded species have been met with during this time, so that a supplementary list is necessary, in order to bring our district- records up to date. M}^ own field-work during this time has been almost altogether restricted to a more thorough invefsti- gation of a few localities, most of which have been favourite hunting-grounds for collectors in former years. Notably the marshes and sandhills on the north coast at Portmarnock, the Dodder valley between Templeogue and the Dublin hills, and the North Bull sands in Dublin Bay. I have also taken the liberty to include in our district list some insects which have occurred on the coast of Meath between Laytown and the Boyne mouth, as the addition of this few miles of coast will give us a claim to many interesting species. The working of the North Bull is due to a suggestion of Mr. Praeger's that the insect fauna and flora of this isolated sandbank should be carefully examined, in view of its comparatively recent formation. As this undertaking will require some time for its completion it seems desirable to record some of the rarer species which have been found there up to the present time. All of the species recorded from Dundrum were taken a few years ago by Mr. F. H. Bullock, many of these he has kindl> presented to the Dublin Museum. Over ninety per cent, of the following records are additions to the Dublin district list, and of these about thirty species have not been previously recorded from Ireland ; the latter are indicated by an asterisk. I have again to thank Dr. D. Sharp and Mr. G. C. Champion for much kind help in the naming of critical species. In the matter of nomenclature the " Catalogue of British Coleoptera " of Sharp and Fowler (1893), has been followed. Carabus glabratus, Payk.— Rare on the Dublin hills; found under moss at the roots of trees, Tibradden. Dyschlrlus s^neus, Dej. — Portmarnock, occurs on the banks of brackish ditches along with D. sa/mus, Schaum. i9oo.l ^A.T.'^V^^t.—Beeths of the D7ibli7i District. 2^9 Amara rufoclncta, Dej.— One specimen found near the end of the North Bull sands. A. lucida, Duft. — Not common. Bembidium normannum, Dej. — Portmarnock, under stones on the shore; B. aneum, Germ., and B. varium, 01., are not uncommon under moss on the banks of the stream in the same locality. *B. ani^Iicanum, vSharp.— Dodder banks, near Templeogue. I found this northern species commonlj^ under stones in June, 1895. B. affine, Steph. — Rare, in the same locality as the preceding. B, punctu latum, Drap.—Blessington and Killiney strand. Acpus marinus, Strom. — Shore at Dollymouut. Haliplus flavicollis, Sturm. — Royal and Grand Canals, common. Bidessus minutissimus, Germ. — I captured a specimen of this very rare water-beetle amongst Water-Thyme {Elodea) in the River Camac, near Clondalkin, on the 12th of last August. There would seem to be some doubt as to the origin of the original British specimens of this species, which were said to have been taken in rivers near Cork (Wollaston, Ent. Mo. Mag., vi., p. 141.) But it now proves to be rather widely distributed in Ireland, as I have taken specimens in the Sheen River, near Kenmare, in the month of April. Ccelambus conf luens, F. — Quarry holes near Lucan and Clontarf. Hydroporus septentrionalis, Gyll,— Common in Lower I^ough Bray. H. Davisii, Curt— Once found in the stream near the Little Dargle. H. Ilturatus, F.— Local. H, discrctus, Fairm. — Royal Canal, in spring. H. vittula, Er. — Lucan, ponds on the Grand Canal bank. Agabus guttatus, Payk.— Duudrum. Ilybius obscurus, Marsh.— Royal Canal, a pair captured in May. Rhantus bistriatus, Berg.— Taken by Mr. G. P. Farran in a bog- pool on Kippure Mountain, iu the same locality where he discovered Agabus anticus, Payk, in the summer of 1896 {Irish Nat., vi„ 86.) Cyrinus clongatus, Aube.— Raheny Ponds, &c. ; much rarer th&n G. natator, in this district. O. opacus, Sahl.— Royal Canal, in early summer. *HcIopliorus lYIuIsantl, Rye. -Portmarnock ; one in a salt-marsh. *Octhe)t)ius auriculatus, Rey.— I first met with this local species near Laytown, on the coast of Meath, Again, in the summer of 1898, it occurred on the North Bull, under the mud in places where there had been small shallow pools, along with numbers of 0. marinus, 0. bicolon and 0. piibescens. *0. Lejolisi, Muls.-Greystones. This interesting species, but recently ' added to the British list, was taken in some numbers by Mr. G. H» Carpenter from stagnant rock-pools, near the coastguard station, in the beginning of June, 1897. It has been recorded only from the French coast, and the extreme S.W. of England. Cercyon terminatus, Marsh.— Local, in flood refuse. 28o The Irish Nahiralist. [December, *AIeochara succlcola, Thorns.— Taken by Mr. Farran in refuse from the Dodder, and b}' myself at Portmarnock ; named by Mr. Champion. A. grisea occurs on the shore at Kilcool and Killiney. 'Oxypoda alternans, Grav. — Ovoca and Powerscourt common in fungi, along with Bolitobhis binoiatus^ B, exolettis, and B. pygmaus. Obtained from moss in the Dun- •O. Wat«rhouscl, Rye. drum district by Mr. F. H. *HoniaIota pavens, En Ht vlllosula, Kr Mschnogrlossa prollxa, Grav. ^ Bullock. The species were identified by Mr. Champion, and are now in the Dublin Museum collection. H. lurldlpennfs, Mann.— Found on the Dublin hills, I am indebted to Dr. Sharp for the naming of this and the five following species :~ H^ loniTuIa, Heer.— Killiney strand, on the bank of a small stream. H. montlcola, Thoms.— Taken at the Scalp. H. corvlna, Thoms.— Ovoca, in fungi. Hi atrlcolor. Sharp.— North Bull; a specimen queried as a dark variety of this species by Dr. Sharp, I have taken a similar form on the Rosslare sands, Co. Wexford. H. nlfi:ra, Kr. — Laytown sandhills, Ocyusa Incrassata, Kr. — Howth Demesne, found in moss in early spring, along with Leptusa fumida. ^Xenusa uvlda, Er. — Greystones, taken in rock-pools by Mr. Carpenter Cyrophsena Idevipennls, Kr.— Ovoca, in fungi. Phytosus balticusy Kr. — Coast of Meath, abundant in decaying star-fishes, along with P. spinifer. Curt. Ollgrota punctulata, Heer. — Bed of the Dodder, with 0. in/lata, Maun. Conosoma pubescens, Grav.— Ovoca. •Lamprlnus sag^inatus, Grav.— Tallaght, obtained in moss from the Dodder banks in April. Heterothops binotata, Kr.— Local, on the Dublin coast. Quedius punctlcollis, Thoms.— Swept off larches near Blessington. Q, fumatus, Steph.— Powerscourt, taken by Dr. Scharff. Q. umbrlnus, Er.— Templeogue, found in flood refuse from the Dodder last September by Mr. Farran. This is a local species in Ireland, the only record is Killarney, but I have taken a specimen on the summit of Leenane Mountain, Co. Galway, in April. O. attenuatus, Gyll. — Local. Ocypus compressusi Marsh.— Dundrum. Phllonthus Intcrmcdlus, Boisd. , P. carbonarlus, Gyll. [ Though unrecorded, all of these P. alblpes, Grav. P. cephaloteS) Grav. P. sordid us, Grav. P. debllls, Grav. P» longlcornis, Steph P. umbratillSi Grav. species occur more or less locally in the Dublin district. P. nigiita, Nord., is rare, specimens were obtained from wet moss near the Raheny Ponds. P. albipes, Grav., P. nigrlta, Nord. occurs on the North Bull. P. mlcansy Grav* j 1900.] Hai^bert. — Beetles oj the Dublin District. 261 *XanthoI!nus fulgridus, F Dundrum, taken by Mr. Bullock. Othius myrmecophilus, Kies.— Howth, &c., in moss. Stllicus similis, Er.— Templeogue, found in flood refuse by Mr. Farran ; named by Mr. Champion. *IVIedon obsoletus, Nord.— Dundrum, taken by Mr. Bullock along with Lithocaris ochracea, Grav. Dianous coeruIescenSp Gyll. — Dodder banks near Tallaght, and other mountain streams. Found resting on stones close to the water in bright sunshine. Stenus canalicuIatuSf Gyll.— Local. 8. crassus var. littoral is, Thoms Occurs on the shore at Port* marnock. *S. picipenniSy Er.— Tallaght, a specimen swept ofl"flowers» Bledius fracticornis, Payk. — Portmarnock. I found a numerous colony of this local species in the drier part of a salt-marsh in May, 1895. B. opacus, Block.— North Bull, along with B. arenaritis, Payk. Oxytelus maritimus, Thoms.— Found under pieces of wood on the North Bull strand, and at Laytown. Of scuIptus,Grav. ^ ^ ^ , J. T-v VCommon. O. complanatus, Er. j Trogophloeus eloni^atulus, Er. — Lucan quarries, off water-plants* T. tenellus, Er. — Dodder Banks. Lesteva longelytrata, Goeze.— Blessington, in refuse from Liffey. IVIicralymma brevipenne, Gyll. ~ Greystones, taken by Mr. Carpenter. Omalium Allardi, Fairm.— Dundrum, along with 0. concinnumi Marsh. O. cxcavaturrij Steph.— Local, marshy places. O. csesum, Grav Sandhills at Portmarnock and Lay town. Tychus niger, Payk. '\ Bythinus bultoifer; Reich./ *Bryaxis Watcrhousei; Rye. — Portmarnock, under stones on a grassy bank close to high-water mark. According to Fowler this species has not been found north of the London district. *EupIectus sanguineus, Denny,^ Dundrum, taken by Mr. F. H. *Euconnus fimetarlus, Chaud. j Bullock. *Scydmaenus scutellaris. Mull.— Tallaght, found in a nest of the small black ant i^Lasius niger) on the Dodder bank. Choleva Wilkini, Spence.— Occurred in fungi from Co. Wicklow. C. nigrita, Er. — Laytown sandhills. Verified by Mr. Champion. Hlster purpurasccns, Herbst. — North Bull, a specimen from this locality is referable to the rare variety niger^ Er. H. neglcctus. Germ. — Local, occurs on the coast. H. xlli-strlatus, Schr. — Found commonly at Dundrum by Mn Bullock, along with a few H. bimaculatusy Lt. Saprinus maritimus, Steph.— North Bull, Kilcool, &c. Acritus minutus, Herbst.— Dundrum ^Gorylophus sublaevlpennlSi Duv.— Portmarnock saud hillsi 282 The Ifish Naturalist. [l^ecembet, Scrlcodcrus lateralis, Gyll — Templeogue and Duudrum. Epuraea deleta, Er.— Local in fungi. Omoslta colon, L.— Portmarnock. Pocadlus ferruglneus, F.— Dundrum. Melli^ethes lumbaris, Sturm— Rare. Ml plclpes, Sturm.— Somewhat local, on brambles. M. otoscurus, Er.— Avoudale. WI. crythropusi Gyll.— North Bull; swept off flowers. Cychramus lutcns, var- fungicola, Heer.— Ovoca, from fungi in woods. Rhlzophag^us cribratus, Gyll.— Little Dargle, under stones near conifers; A', fcrforatiis, Er., occurs locally about Dublin. Cortlcaria pubescens, Gyll.— Tolka valley in spring, Dr. D Freeman. C. crenulata, Gyll.— North Bull, a specimen found on the golf-links in the mouth of May. Cryptophagus lycoperdl, Herbst—Killiney strand ♦C. sai^lnatus, Sturm. — Local. *C. cellaris, Scop.— North Bull. C. distlnguendus, Sturm.— Lay town sandhills. C. bicolor, Sturm. Atomaria aplcalis, Er. A. analis, Er. A. ruflcornis, Marsh. J Dundrum, taken by Mr. Bullock ; species identified by Mr. Champion. Elm Is Volkmarl, Panz. — River Liffey, near Blessington. Hctcroccrus f Icxuosus, Steph. — North Bull, under stones, in the month of July. Aphodlus nitldulus, F. — Templeogue, taken in flood refuse from the Dodder by Mr. Farrau, along with A. erraiicns, L., and A. fcetens, F., The last-mentioned species occurs on the North Bull sands in autumn. •A. plaglatus, L.— North Bull salt-marsh. I found this local species in numbers under dried mud in the summer of 1898, all of the unicolorous black variety. It has not been recorded from the main- land. Ai porcusi F. — Dundrum, Portmarnock, and the Laytown sandhills ; found singly and always in the autumn mouths. Trox scaber, L.— Taken by Dr. R. F. Scharff near Dundrum. Melolontha hippocastani, F. — A specimen taken by sweeping herbage on the coast of Meath. Throscus dcrmestoldes, L. — Lifl'ey banks at Lucan. Hydrocyphon deflexicollls, Miill. — Templeogue. Sclrteshemlsphderlcus, L.— Raheny Ponds off Equisetum. Telephorus figuratus, Mann l/ucan, in the demesne. T. darwinlanus, Sharp. — This interesting species was first discovered on the Dublin coast, near Dollymouut, by Messrs. Brooks. I subsequently found it under stones in the same locality, close to high -water mark The only other Irish locality on record is the Foyle district, where Mr. C. W. Buckle has taken it abundantly. I90O.] YLM,-^%^t. — -Beetles of the Diiblin District, 283 Thanasimiis formicarius, I^. — Grand Canal Dock, several found in a tree trunk said to have come from central Ireland. Ptilinus pectiniGornis, L. — The remains of this species were found in a tree stump near Artane by Mr. Farran. Octotcmnus ^labriculus, GylL— Dundrum. Strang-alia armata, Herbst.— Abundant at the Dargle, July. Leiopus nebulosus, L.— Beaten off oak trees in the Lucan demesne. Donacia versicolorea, BrahrK — Ralienj- Ponds, and in a marsh by the Lifife}' near Blessington. D. thalasslna. Germ. — Ro3-al Canal, near Dublin. D. vulgaris, Zsch. — Rare. I have taken single examples in the Royal Canal, Raheny Ponds, and in the quarry holes near the village ofCrumlin. ChrysoiYiela hyperici, Forst.— Local ; found in the Devil's Glen by Mr. Carpenter. Phaedon armoraciae> L. --Rare. Aditnonia tanacet!, L.— Templeogne; once found in a spider's web. Lochmaea crataegi, Forst.— Portmarnock ; abundant on hawthorn "blossoms in May. G alerucclla sagittariae, Gyll.— Occurs in the Royal Canal. l-ongitarsus piciceps, Steph.^j L. fcmoralis, Marsh. I Very local ; the two last occur on L, gracilis, Kuts. j ' the coast. L. laevis, Duft. j *PhyIlotrcta consolbr'ina. Curt. — Kingstown. Mr. T. Porter found this species in vast numbers, destroying turnips, &c., in the summer of 1898. See Mr. G. H. Carpenter's " Report on Economic Entomo- logy" for that year. Mr. Champion has kindly verified this deter- mination, referring the specimens, which were not quite typical, to •a dark variety oi P. consoh-ma, Curt. Curiously enough the species had not been previously noticed in Ireland. Psylliodcs marcida, 111.— North Bull sands. Tcnetorio molitor, L. — Dublin. Rhinosimus viridipennis, Stepli. — Dundrum, under -elm bark, *Choragus Sheppardl, Kirby. — Templeogne, taken by Mr. Farran last September. Identified by Mr. Champion. *Apion rubcns, Steph.— Woodlands, Co, Dublin. *A. stolidum, Germ.— Lay town sandhills. Otiorrhynchus auropunctatus, Gyll.— This most interesting weevil has now occurred as far south as Co. Wicklow {/risA N'at,, vol. ix., p. 108). I have taken it abundantly at Portmarnock and Santry b)' beating hedges of hawthorn, ash, and privet. It seems probable that the insect recorded as O. tenehricosus, Herbst., in Hogan's Dublin list, may have been in reality the present species, as the two insects bear a superficial resemblance to each other The locality where 0. tenebricosus is said to have been found— Baldoyle — has been repeatedly worked, but we have never succeeded in finding it A3 284 T^^^^ Irish Naturalist. [December, there, uor has it occurred elsewhere in Ireland. On the other hand O. auropituctatus is common near Baldoyle. It is interesting to note that the species has not yet been detected in either England or Scotland. O. muscorum, Bris.— Portmarnock, along with O. ovaliis, L., which is a much rarer species in this localitv. TrachyphKDBus scaber, L. — Taken near Tallaght by Dr. ScharfT. Caenopsis WaltonI, Schiiu. — Ovoca, in wooas. Brachysomus echinatus, Bonsd — Local. Orobltis cyancus, L. — Portmarnock. Acalles turbatus, Boh. ) A. ptinoides, Marsh. JDundrum. *Ccuthorrhynchiclius mixtus, Muls. — A specimen of this insect occurred on the Laytown sandhills, coast of ]\Ieath. This specimen which was taken by sweeping plants, remained in my collection for two or three years, until Mr. Champion identified it as the above species. In Great Britain it is only known to occur in Devon and Lincolnshire. *C. Dawson I, Bris. — Found by searching about the roots of plants on the shore at Portmarnock. Eutorychius velatus, Bech, — Grand Canal, Dublin; and near Monasterevan. Rhopalomesitcs Tardyi, Curtis. — Taken abundantly near Dundrum and Balbriggau. *CauIotrypis aeneopiceus, Boh. — Mr. C W. Buckle got a nice series of this local weevil out of an old ash tree at Portmarnock. ♦Codiosoma spadix, Herbst — South Bull, found in a piece of wood, lying on the shore, by Mr. lUiUock. The following vSpecies occur among some insects presented to the Dublin Museum by Mr. H. G. Cuthbert. They were all taken by him in south I^outh : — Hclophorus rugosusi 01. — Termonfeckin strand. Procadius ferrugincus, F.— Clogher Head; found in a "puff- ball." Laemophloeus ferrugineus; Steph. — One specimen. lYIalthinus fasciatus, Ol. *IVlezium affJnc, Boield. — This curious insect occurred in an old fishing-tackle box, which had been lying by for years. It would seem to be an introduced species in some localities. *Ano)t)iuin paniceum, L. Lema septentrionis, Suffr. Science and Art ?Iuseum, Dublin. I900-J 285 NEW STATIONS FOR RARE PLANTS. BY R. IXOYD PRAKGER, B-E. The following notes of rare plants would not in the ordinary- course obtain publication in the notes on my own recent field- work ; and they appear to deserve a more extended notice than I can hope to give them in ^' Irish Topographical Botany." Nasturtium sylvestrc, L— Messrs. W. West and W. N. Tetley, of Portora Royal vSchool, informed me last July that they had gathered this at Belleisle, on Lough Erne, where they found a large bed of it ; and they have since forwarded specimens in confirmation of their statement. The plant was recorded by Mackay {Syst. cat. rare planls)in 1806, as found on Lough Brne by Dr. Scott ; and the only confirmatory evidence of its existence there lay in an immature specimen gathered at Belleisle by Mr. Harrington (Barrington and Vowell : Report on the Flora of the shores of Lough Ree, 1887), and doubtfully referred to this species. Its occurrence in the northern half of Ireland is now for the first time placed bej^ond doubt. Arabis hirsuta, Scop., var. g'labrata, Syme. — Mr. A. Bennett so names good specimens grown from plants gathered on the Great Island of Aran in 1895 as A. ciliata. Both plants have been recorded from Aran, the latter by Hart (A List of Plants found in the Islands of Aran, 1875), the former in Eng, Bot., ed. 3, L, 168, Rev. B. S. Marshall writes that he considers the common West of Ireland A. hirsuta is not the English A. hirsuta, and suggests that it is^. ciliata, var. hispida, Syme. Between glabrous hirsuta and hispid ciliata there appears to be a good chance of a very pretty muddle, and botanists visiting the West of Ireland would do well to gather a good series of any Arabis they find there, for critical examination. Geranium pusillum, L. — I am glad to be able to record two new stations for this, one of our rarest Irish plants. In June last Mr. Joseph Meade sent me sjDecimeus from cultivated ground at Old Connaught, near Bray, and in the autumn he again sent me living examples from waste ground not far off. A doubtful scrap of a Geranium, in the herbarium of Mrs. D. D. Persse, collected a few years ago near Ballinrobe, appeared to belong to this species. ]\Ir. Stanhope Kenn}' kindly revisited the spot last autumn under Mrs. Persse's directions, and sent me therefrom an undoubted specimen of G. pisillu/n. lYIedicag^o sylvcstris, Fries.— (See I.N., v., 249, 1896). On going through the Irish herbarium in the Science and Art Museum I find a specimen of this plant labelled ** Medicago sativa. Portmarnock, September, 1867." The handwriting shows it to be from the herbarium of Rev. H. G. Carroll. A more robust specimen, which I can only refer doubtfully to this species (neither specimen is in fruit) is labelled " Medicago falcata. Sandy fields near Baldoyle ; July, 1846. Ex, herb. Dr. Steele." Another hand has altered the name to sativa. 2S6 The Irish Naturalist. [December, These specimens are interesting as showing proof that the plant has grown at Portmaruock certainly for over thirty years, and probably for at least half a century. Artemisia maritiina, L-— Mrs. Frank Joyce sends this (June, 1900), from the coast beyond Barna, W. Galway, an interesting addition to the flora of District VII [. Scropliularia umbrosa, Dum. — In my own herbarium I find a specimen of this plant gathered by the Lififey, above the Salmon-leap at Ivcixlip, Co. Kildare, on the occasion of the Dublin Nat. Field Club excursion in August, 1894, but not recognised at the time. Its only other Irish stations lie a little further down the river in Co- Dublin, where it was found and identified by Mr. Colgan in 1895 {_LN., v., 1S2, 1896.) Spiranthes Romanzoviana, Cham. — I received last September from Mrs. Crookshank, The Warren, Portrush, a specimen of this extremely rare orchid, gathered in a new station near Kilrea, Co. Derr}'. Mrs. Leebody's station lay by the river, about a mile below Kilrea (/./v'*., ii., 228, 1893), Mrs. Crookshauk's locality is close to the town. Cephalanthcra ensifolia, Rich.— Mr. W. F. de V. Kane sent me in June, 1898, an orchid gathered close to Pontoon Bridge, West Mayo. The specimen arrived in so battered a condition, owing to an accident in transport, that I was afraid to name it definitely; but after a minute examination Mr. Rolfe has no hesitation in saying that my provisional naming is correct. This forms a valuable addition to the flora of District VIII. LeucojuiYi aestivum, L.— This plant was found growing in some abundance in a swamp by the river Slane3% near Macmine, in 1897, by Rev. E. S. Marshall, who stated {Journ. Bot., 1S9S, p. 49) his con- viction that the plant was native there. It was not admitted as such in Cyhele Hihcniica. Mr. Marshall repeated his opinion injourn. Bof., 1899, p. 272, and Messrs. Colgan and Scully reply on the general question in the same volume, pp. 315-7. In May last Mr. Wm. F. Nicholson sent me specimens of this plant from near Waterford. In replj' to inquiries Mr. Nicholson writes that the plant grows in Kilbarry Bog, on the outskirts of Waterford ; that it has groM'n there for thirty or forty years ; and that the place is not near any house or garden. I have also received specimens from Mr. R. D. O'Brien, collected on the Clare side of the Shannon, two miles north of lyimerick. The finder writes; — *' A creek enters the Shannon on the Clare side, about a quarter of a mile below the salmon weir, which is almost at the head of the tide- way, and the land intervening is the only bit of the Shannon marshes- which has not been embanked. They are overflowed at spring-tides, and consist of marshy meadows and sallies. *' In June, 1897, I found Laicojitm fruiting in the meadow, and have since observed it there every spring. This year I examined the place t9oo.] pRAHGKR. — Neiv Statiom for Rare Plants. 287 carefully, and found it growing here and there in the meadows, and more abundantly in the sallies. I also traced it up the course of the creek as far as the tide flows. Following the water I dare say its habitat extends over something less than half a mile of ground. I also found two or three plants of Narcissus bijlorus along the stream. "There is a gentleman's place, ' Whitehall,' adjoining the creek, and it is possible that someone may have thrown a lot of the roots into the water, and that they were distributed by the tide ; but I think this a very forced explanation of the occurrence of this deeply- rooting and not much cultivated bulb over so large an area, and in so scattered a way ; besides it seems to be strictly confined to the land subject to tidal overflow. I searched all the places that I thought likely in the neighbourhood, but I could not get it elsewhere." It will be seen that, although none of the stations mentioned are free from suspicion, the plant is at least well established in three localities in the southern half of Ireland, the habitat being in each case just the kind of ground that it effects in England (where Watson ranks it as a denizen, possibly native in the south-east) and on the Continent, where it has a wide range. Further investigation will probably show that it may be admitted as a permanent member of our flora, with the double dagger prefixed, which signifies "probably introduced." Trichomancs radicans, Sw. — The investigations of Messrs. West and Tetley have added the Killarney Fern to the flora of Co. Fermanagh. They sent me a specimen last August, describing the exact locality — a deep crevice in limestone rocks ; but I think it better not to publish the station, so terribly has this lovely plant suffered from the depredations of unscrupulous collectors. National Library, Dublin. PROCEEDINGS OF IRISH SOCIETIES. RoYAi, ZooT.oGiCAi. Society. Recent gifts include four Giant Tortoises from the Hon. Walter Roths- child, a pair of Wild Mallards from Mr. R Donegan, a South African Penguin from Prof. D. J. Cunningham, and an Oyster catcher from Mr. E. Williams. 10,726 persons visited the Gardens during October. Dubinin Microscopicai, Ci.ub. May 3. Mr. MooRE showed specimens of Cribraria aarantiaca, an interesting fungus of rare occurrence in Ireland. The specimens exhibited were found growing on the clay in the tubs in the large cool Fern-house at Glasnevin. Mr. M'Ardi.E exhibited leaves of the Yew-tree, closely covered with germinating pollen grains, which must have been blown a considerable distance by the wind. 288 The Irish NaUcralist, [December, Mr. W. N. Ai^ivEN showed seeds of Aristolochia serpentaria taken from capsules found in a parcel of the dried rhizomes as an accidental admixture. The seeds are bluntly triangular, convex and warted on lower surface which is traversed by a thick flesh}' white raphe. Mr. F. M. SeIvI^ENS exhibited two slides: — (i) a preparation of fossil Diatomaceae from Monticelli, U.S., and (2) a preparation of Tripoli earth from Kritohelbergh, Bohemia. BEI.FAST Naturai. History and Phii^osophicai, Society. Nov. 6. — The President, Mr. J. Brown opened the session with an inaugural address on "Some Matters Electric," with lantern and ex- perimental illustrations. Dubinin Naturai^ists' Fiei^d Ci,ub. November 6. — The winter session was opened with the usual Con* versazione in the house of the Royal Irish Academy, 19, Dawson-street, under the presidency of Mr. Greenwood Pim, M.A. The attendance was large, notwithstanding the inclement weather. About 200 members and visitors were present, including many ladies. The function com- menced, as on previous occasions, in the form of a social gathering, which was held from 7.30 till 8.45 p.m. At the latter hour the President took the chair, and made an opening address, welcoming all present to the inaugural meeting of the session. He then gave a succinct account of the work and progress of the Club. He was glad to see such a large attendance at the opening meeting, which compensated for the falling- off in the number of members attending this summer's excursions. Next the Prize Awards were declared, the winners being as follows :— President's prize for a series of photo-micrographs of geological sections, Mr. H.J. Seymour; Flowering Plants, Miss E. M'Intosh, Mrs. R. D. Alcockj Crustacea, Mr. W. F. de V. Kane ; Land and P'resh-water Mollusca, Miss Massy; Igneous rocks, Mr. Seymour. Reports from the various judges were read by the Hon. Sec, Dr. N. H. Alcock. At nine o'clock Dr. C. J. PatTEN, Hon. Sec, commenced his lantern demonstrations on "Irish Birds." The speaker opened his address b}- urging on the members of the Club the necessity of bringing on com* munications at the winter ordinary meetings. To the junior members these remarks were particularly applicable. The Club required that more discussions should arise at the winter meetings. The membership was large, and, no doubt, if the members were encouraged, a more varied programme of scientific communications would be brought before the meetings. Following these remarks. Dr. Patten commenced to exhibit his lantern slides on " Irish Birds." Many of the scenes thrown on to the canvas were from photographs taken from nature, representing a variety of birds indigenous to Ireland, and some of the photographs were those of birds in captivity in the Dublin Zoological Gardens. A concise classification of Irish birds was gone into, and typical examples in each large order were exhibited on the screen to illustrate their habits. 1900.] Proceedings of Irish Societies. 289 As next speaker, Mr. R. M. BarringTon referred chiefly to the migration of birds as observed at Irish lighthouses and lightships. He dealt particularly with the migration of the common Song Thrush, a bird generally supposed to be resident and sedentary, but which comes to this country in great numbers between 20th October and middle of November. The course taken during the migratorj' flight was clearly indicated. Mr. R. J. USSHER following, gave an interesting account of the habits and distribution of Irish birds in general. He urged that much more work could still be done on Irish ornithology, and he hoped to see workers in the field of ornithology persisting patiently in their arduous toil. The speaker referred to the increase and decrease of certain species, and he hoped that those birds approaching extinction would be vigorously protected. Next Mr. SKymour exhibited a series of lantern slides of rock sections. These were the prize micro-photographs, and were well executed. Dr. AivCOCK shewed some lantern slides of bats from nature, also of minute structures of nervous and vascular tissues. Many of these photographs were most difficult to prepare, and they showed much skill on the part of the exhibitor. The President threw on the screen several capital photographs of birds and beasts in captivity in the Dublin Zoological Gardens, which afforded much interest to the audience. During the evening a number of scientific exhibits were on view. Mr. R. J. Ussher'S collection of birds' eggs certainly require special mention. It was of very large extent, and occupied most of the centre table. It is admittedly the finest collection of its kind in Ireland, and a large series of the best clutches have now been acquired by the National Museum. Ornithological exhibits were strongly represented, including, in addition, some beautifully mounted specimens, of birds from Dublin Bay vicinity by Mr. Williams ; rare specimens from the Science and Art Museum, shown b}' Dr. SchariF; together with Dr. Patten's exhibits illustrating the plumage, changes, and life-history of certain wading birds Space will not permit of the description of all the exhibits, but among them maybe mentioned the following: — Mr. Carpenter— Beech- wood bored by the Weevil, Mesiles Tardy i ; Professor Cole — Illustrations of gems and precious stones as they occur in nature; Dr. Foord — Irish Cricoids; Mr. J. N. Halbert— Collection of Water-beetles from the Museum series of Irish animals ; Prof. Johnson — Fungus on Tobacco plant grown in Ireland; Mr. Patterson — Fungi from Dunran ; Mr. Moore — Rare plants from Glasnevin ; Mr. Seymour — Igneous rocks and photo-micrograph apparatus; Mr. Welch — Land and Fresh-water Shells. Coff"ee was supplied shortly before 10 o'clock, at which hour a very successful and enjoyable meeting was brought to a closd 290 [December, NOTKvS. ZOOLOGY. INSECTS. Entomologrical Notes from Ulster. Mr. W. H. Patterson, of vStrandtown, Belfast, has coutiuued liis efforts to add to our knowledge of the coleopterous fauna of Ireland, and has sent me a number of beetles from various localities ; the more interesting of his captures I now enumerate: — At Ball3'castle, mostly inland — Philonthiis laminatus, Creutz. , Qucdiiis niesomelimis, Marsh., Tehphonis nigricans v. discoideus, Steph., Lema e}'ichsoni, Safifr., an interesting caj^ture, extending the range of this insect from Cork to Antrim ; Crcpidodera helixines, L. At Kilroot, near Ca.vric'ki&rgxxs—Harpaliisru/ibaf'bis, F., Hydroportis vittiila^ Er., Homalinni rujipes, Fourc. , Corymbites qnercus, Gyll. , Brachypterus piibescens, Br., Cyphon nitidultis^ Thoms., Anaspis nijlcollis, F., Otiorrhynchus mtisconiM, Bris., Doiytomiis tortrix, L. At Killough, Co. Down — Pterostichtis stremms, Panz., Hydroponis lepiduSi 01., H. pubescens, Gyll., H. lituratus, F., Laccobius bipttnctaiits, F., Sphceriaiwn marginatum, F., Liosoma ovatulum, Clairv. At Strandtown, Co. Dovm— A maraplebeia, Gyll., Note r us spar stis, Marsh., Phyllopertha horticola, L., Donacia vulgaris, Zsch. {typ/ics, Ahr.), Dorytotnus tortrix, L. At Tollymore Park, Co. Down — Cychramus fungicola,'H.itQr, Dr. Sharp, I believe, considers Cfunqicola, Heer., and C. lutcus, F., to be — the former the male and the latter the female of the same species; and in Fowler and Sharp's Catalogue fnngicola is given as a synonym of luteus. Epurea astiva, L-, Adrastus limbatus, F., Athous niger, L., Corymbites quercus, Gyll., He/odes minuta, 'L,., Grammoptera rufoornis, F. Mr, Patterson also beat from trees a number of Hemipterous larvae, which I referred to Mr. E. Saunders, who pronounces them to be the larval form of Podisus {Asopus) luridus, Fab. ; they were present in numbers, but none of the perfect insect occurred. At Newcastle, Co. Down, on sandhills — Harpal us tardus, Panz., Dromius linearis, 01., Byrrhtis fasciatus, P\, Lacon murinus, L., Strophosomus retusus^ Marsh. At Stormount, Co. Bown-^Byturus iomentostis F., Athous niger, L-) Crepidodera ventralis, lib At Bundoran, on September 4, Mr. Patterson found swarms of Coccinella yi\-puuctata, L., along with its larva on the Bent^grass and crawling on the sand ; they must have been very numerous, for he remarks: "where they had congregated they were so numerous that a thousand might have been counted in a short time"; besides this Ladybird Mr. Patterson took Broscus cephalotes, L., Adimonia tanaceti, L-, Otiorrhynchus atroapterus, De G., a fortn with bright red femora, and Barynotus Schonherri^ Zett. 1900.] Notes. 291 At Groomsport, Co. Down — Amara fulva, Dej., A. coiisularis, Duft., Ccelambus iDipressopunctaiiis , Sch. {j>icipes, F.) Considering that Mr. Patterson makes no pretension to being an entomologist, I think he is much to be congratulated on the success that has attended his collecting; there are not man}- who would so unselfishly give their time and trouble to help others in a pursuit of which they themselves are practically ignorant. Mr. Patterson generously gives all his captures to me, and as he has not studied the Coleoptera he is deprived of that exquisite delight which attends the capture of a " good thing." Mr. S. A. Stewart sent me a fine specimen oi Acanthocintis (tdih's, L., male, which was taken in the end of August by a workman on the Queen's Island, Belfast ; the insect probably emerged from timber in the shipyard ; w^hoever the captor was, he deserves commendation for capturing the beetle without injuring its immensely long antennae. My friend, W. A. Hamilton, Esq., of Coxtown, Co. Donegal, sent me, on August 10, a fine specimen of Carabtcs glabratiis, Payk., which he had captured on a mountain about three miles from Coxtown. In a letter dated vSeptember 12 the same gentleman writes that he has during the season seen six Vanessa io, L- — five at Coxtown and one at Coolmore — so that the butterfly is evidently pretty well established in that locality. He also sent me a specimen of the pretty H3'menopteron, Chrysis ignita, and from a description given, Szrex gigas has turned up at Coxtown, causing an alarm of " hornets " to be raised. From another part of Donegal, viz., Narin, by the kindness of Colonel W. J. Alexander, of Acton House, Poyntzpass, I received specimens of Thecla nibi, L., Zygcena lojiicerce, Esp., Eiithenionia riissula, I-/., Centra vinnla' Iv., and Anarta myrtilli^ L. Of captures made here I have but few to record : — a few days ago I took Bembidium bruxellense, Wesm., in my potato field crawling about among the lumps of earth ; in July I took Herminia grisealis^ Hb., Plusia pulchrjna. Haw., Gonoptera libatrix, L., Cidaria pyraleata^ L., which is much more like forms from York than those from Donegal, and Enrrhypara tirticata, L/, On August loth, Heliophobus popularise Fab., flew into my dining- room and was captured. On September 5 I made a capture which much pleased me. I was returning from paying a visit in Co. Down, and was walking along a by-road in the townland of Loughadian not very far from Poyntzpass, when a Painted Lady {Vanessa cardui, L.) settled on the road just in front of me. 1 had no net, so made at the butterfly with my hat ; my first attempt was a failure, but the butterfly settled again on the road, and using greater caution I got my hat over it, and as I had a box in my pocket soon had it safe. It was a perfectly fresh specimen, the result no doubt of eggs laid in the early summer by some immigrant. Va?iessa atalanla, L., was remarkably plentiful this autunm, and I found one to-day (October 15) on my avenue where it had evidently dropped and been trodden on. I was in Armagh on October 11, and was informed by a man that a shopkeeper in the town had captured a >vonderful " bat.'' I knew from experience that this meant a large moth- 292 The Irish Naturalist. [December, On visiting the shopkeeper in question, Mr. Alexander Wallace, grocer, Scotch-street, I found that the "bat " was a fine Death's-head moth. It had flown into his kitchen, whither I think it was probably attracted by a bunch of bananas that were hanging there. In my last note {ante, p, 184), I mentioned the appearance of numbers of theHemipteron, Piezodorus h'iuraiits, Fab., in May, and remarked that the time of appearance was different from that given by Mr. Saunders. I wrote to Mr. Saunders on the subject, and he replied that in indicating autumn he merely meant that the insect was most usually met with at that time. I have this day (October iSth) found the autumn brood in abundance on gorse, evidently just out. W. F, Johnson, Poyntzpass. Vanessa !o in Co. Down. Perhaps the following may be of use to you: — A friend of mine, when at Newcastle, Co. Down, about the third week in October, saw several of the Peacock Butterflj', Vanessa to, and captured one. Mr. W. Gray saw one in his garden 'at Belfast. One was brought to me got here, but this may have been an escape, as I had a quantity of larvae feeding, which I got sent from Donegal. I see by the guide book there is only one specimen recorded. J. HaMITvTON. Holywood, Co. Down. Gnophrla quadra In Co. Wexford and the Isle of IVIan. The rare moth, Gnophria quadra, occurred in some numbers about Ballyhyland this year. I came across two females and (I think) four males between July 28th and August loth. These were all picked up after heavy rains, the males mostly in a very bedraggled state, and both the females dead, and I made no attempt to preserve them. I have since seen, with regret, that there is no specimen of this moth in the Irish collection in the Museum. It has previously been recorded for Co. Wexford. Since writing the above note I have had a letter from my friend, Mr. H. Shortridge Clarke, F.E.S., of Sulby, Isle of Man, who has a splendid collection of Manx lepidoptera, the result of many years' work, and he informs me that the same species turned up this year for the first time in the Isle of Man, where three specimens were taken. I think this is a very interesting coincidence, when we consider how closelj^ the fauna of the Isle of Man resembles that of Ireland. C. B. Moffat. Ballyhyland. FISHES. Porbeasrle Shark and Tope In Klllala Bay. About the middle of October, when walking along the sands of Ennis- crone, looking out for any storm-worn birds that might have been driven ashore by the N.W. gale of the previous days, I came across a specimen I900-] Notes, 293 of the Porbeagle Shark, Lauina corniibica (Yarrell) ; it was about four feet in length. It appears to be very rare on this coast, being the only specimen I have ever met, On the same day I found a specimen of the Tope Dogfish, Galeus vulgaris (Yarrell), about a hundred yards from where the Porbeagle was lying, and in appearance the contrast between the two fishes was very remarkable, the rounded pig-like form of the Porbeagle with its large round eyes, looking so utterly different, from the long, slender body of the Tope, with its flattened, depressed head and small oval-shaped eyes. Robe;rt Warren. Moyview, Ballina, BIMDS. Crossbills nesting^ In South Cork. Mr. Moffat's remark (see p, 254 above), that the Crossbill is increasing as a breeding species in Ireland reminds me that among our bird visitors during the severe weather of Februarj' last we had a pair of Crossbills which .nested with us, and I have seen no record of their yet nesting in Cork, though they nested in Tipperary in 1839. I first noticed them on the morning of February 20th, before the snow which fell on the loth had all melted, and though I did not actually see their nest till a fortnight later, I am sure that it was then finished. So that the brave little birds had commenced building while long icicles were still hanging in places from the pine branches, and perhaps while many other birds were dj-ing of cold. Starlings especially suffered. On the morning of the 14th fifteen of them died in our stable about thirty yards from the site of the Crossbills' nest, and from the loth to the 14th very many Starlings, Redwings, Song Thrushes, Fieldfares, and Blackbirds, besides some smaller birds, died, though haws and ivy berries were plentiful then and long after. I, however, saw no dead Mistle Thrushes. Well, as I have already said, the Crossbills had their nest quite finished before the 20th ; they very obligingly nested right in front of the house, where from either my bedroom or breakfast-room windows I could easily watch them coming and going until I left at 10 o'clock, though the nest was hidden by a br?nch. And in the evenings after school my little son kept sharper eyes than mine on their movements during preparation time, and reported anything unusual. They were very tame, the cock often allowed us to come quite close while he rested on a bare ash branch or hacked at a fir cone. We never saw either of them on the ground save once when the cock rose from some Raspberry canes, but occasionally he alighted on the eave-shoots perhaps for water. The nest was hard to see from the ground, and I was afraid of frightening them by climbing the tree on which for a long time before we saw it we knew it was. Hatching commenced on February 23rd; before then the pair were always together, but afterwards the cock was usually alone. I did not go to see the nest till March 9th. Nothing disturbed them. Our cat had disappeared for ever since last year. I saw him from the window 294 ^'^^ hish Naturalist, [December, 1900. standing in a Mistle Thrush's nest. Robins' and Wrens' nests had been previously destroyed, but not since ; and for some time I have discouraged the visits of Grey Crows, Magpies, and Sparrow Hawks with a gun. On April ist the young birds took their first fly, and until the 12th we saw two or three or four almost every day. We have seen none since* but hope, though we hardly expect, the}- will, favour us again next February. Anyway we made their stay with us as pleasant for them as we knew how. Bramblings were rather plentiful while the snow lasted, as usual during our rare heavy snowfalls, though we never see one at other times. Eight or ten came every morning to feast on some seeds provided, they, like their cousms the Chaffinches, seemed little the worse for the cold. I also saw Bramblings in two other places at some distance then. They were equally plentiful in January, 1894, but for six years we had not seen any. Perhaps in these rambling notes I may mention that the Swallows have not all left us yet. At least three were here on November 8th. The latest date I have ever seen them was November 19th, but even here their appearance any time in November is unusual. Skibbereen. John J. Woi^fej. The Ruff in Ireland. I have read with very much interest Dr. C. J. Patten's article in the August number on the Natural History of the Ruff in Ireland, and though at present away from Ireland, cannot refrain from sending a very brief note on a specimen shot in August, 1895 or 1896, at Calary Bog, Co. Wicklow. This specimen, a female adult, was stuffed for me by Mr. Williams, of Dame-street, who will be able to furnish Dr. Patten full particulars should he desire them. I shot it in the identical spot where I shot two Wood .Sandpipers a year or two afterwards, this full}' bearing out Dr. Patten's accurate remarks about the inland migratory habits of the Ruff, and its partiality for heathery and peaty districts. As my address shows, I am away far from my ornithological note-books, which are locked up at my home. Ernest Bi,ake Knox, Lydenberg, Transvaal. MAMMALS, The Vision of Cetaceans, In the summer of 1887 I stayed some time afthe head of Loch Alsh, in Ross-shire. There was at the time of our coming there a Porpoise with two young calves. The two calves were usually to be seen basking on the water, with their heads and backs well above the surface. I never saw them go under. There they used to lie quietly enough ; but when- ever we tried to approach them they would at once begin to move away, always keeping about the same distance from our boat. There did not appear to be any reason for doubting that they were watching our move- ments. Howth. W. E. Hart. MBL WHOI LIBRARY yH lABS X It I