X (/) i 1*^ ' ' I I I | / 2 "^SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOliniliSNI NVINOSHillMs‘"’s3 I d VH 8 H^LI B RAR I ES^^’sMITHSON ^ XV 2 ^ Z \ ^ ^ ^ 2 oc K C OQ _ -=• 2 NviNOSHilws S3 lava an libraries Smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi NViNOSHii z 'Z ^ ^ 5 O rr, 2 ■n ^ m ''<2L£i>^ 2 rn ^ Xi2ili2!^ rn '"’smITHSONIAN“|NSTITUTION NOIinillSNl~NVINOSHilWS S3 I d Vd 8 H'lI B R AR I ES^SMITHSON ■n z (/> z w H .... t/) 5 ^ ., ,..y H I ^ ^ I W 8 > i > 'W^ 2 5 2 NviNOSHiiws^^’sa I dvaa n libraries Smithsonian institution NoiiniiisNf nvinoshiii! C/) ^ ^ ^ X nj v 30 ^ ' m ^ rn ^ Xjvas>a2^ rn X^Ss® E z , w ^ ^ z • w z 2 ■ > ''^CivA^ 2 I 5 'SMITHSONIAN~INSTITUTION‘"’NOIiniliSNI_NVINOSHiiyMs‘"’s3 I d"vd 8 ll^LI B R AR I ES^^’sMITHSONIW ' — ^ z \ _ O) E {/) SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOlinillSNI NVINOSHIIWS S3ldVdan LIBRARIES SMITHSONIf CO z . (O z ^ w z ,..■. w ^ €f .viA , S .< 2 ,< 2 „ > : y) ‘ z CO 2 CO NviNosHims S3idvdan libraries Smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi nvinoshiii CO CO ^ CO ^ (lit' rf 1^^ =i n i Ki iris rill® riTUTION X (/) I s I* ‘^NOlinillSNI NVINOSHillMS*^'" s > to — Z BR ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION to Ui lavuan librar ES SMITHSONIAN X to O z z INSTITUTION NOliniliSNI NviNOSHiii/\is"S3 1 a va 0 n JITUTION _ to NOliniliSNI NViNosHims S3 lava an _ Ui LIBRARIES I avaa n _ > to 2 ES SMITHSONIAN 00 2 INSTITUTION NOliniliSNI to oj ZJ SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION S I -•* 2 io NviNOSHiiws S3 1 a va an 2 vv. . a: to ri f 1 s ■i \ ‘t 'I 't 1 $ i The Journal of ARACHNOLOGY OFFICIAL ORGAN OF THE AMERICAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 19 1991 NUMBER 1 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY EDITOR: James E. Carico, Lynchburg College ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Gary L, Miller, The University of Mississippi EDITORIAL BOARD: J. E. Carrel, Univ. Missouri; J. A. Coddington, Na- tional Mus. Natural Hist.; J. C. Cokendolpher, Lubbock, Texas; F. A. Coyle, Western Carolina Univ.; C. D. Dondale, Agriculture Canada; W. G. Eberhard, Univ. Costa Rica; M. E. Galiano, Mus. Argentine de Ciencias Naturales; M. H. Greenstone, BCIRL, Columbia, Missouri; N. V. Horner, Midwestern State Univ.; D. T. Jennings, Garland, Maine; V. F. Lee, California Acad. Sci.; H. W. Levi, Harvard Univ.; E. A. Maury, Mus. Argentine de Ciencias Naturales; N. 1. Plat- nick, American Mus. Natural Hist.; G. A. Polis, Vanderbilt Univ.; S. E. Riechert, Univ. Tennesse; A. L. Rypstra, Miami Univ., Ohio; M. H. Robinson, U.S. Na- tional Zool. Park; W. A. Shear, Hampden-Sydney Coll.; G. W. Uetz, Univ. Cin- cinnati; C. E. Valerio, Univ. Costa Rica. The Journal of Arachnology (ISSN 0160-8202), a publication devoted to the study of Arachnida, is published three times each year by The American Arach- nological Society. Memberships (yearly): Membership is open to all those inter- ested in Arachnida. Subscriptions to The Journal of Arachnology and American Arachnology (the newsletter), and annual meeting notices, are included with mem- bership in the Society. Regular, $30; Students, $20; Institutional, $80 (USA) or $90 (all other countries). Inquiries should be directed to the Membership Secretary (see below). Back Issues: Susan E. Riechert, Department of Zoology, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37916 USA. Undelivered Issues: Allen Press, Inc., 1041 New Hampshire Street, P.O. Box 368, Lawrence, Kansas 66044 USA. THE AMERICAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY PRESIDENT: George W. Uetz (1989-1991), Department ofBiological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA. PRESIDENT-ELECT: Allen R. Brady ( 1989-199 1 ), Biology Department, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49423 USA. MEMBERSHIP SECRETAR Y: Norman 1. Platnick (appointed), American Mu- seum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, New York 10024 USA. TREASURER: Gail E. Stratton (1989-1991), Department of Biology, Albion College, Albion, Michigan 49224 USA. SECRETARY: James W. Berry (1 989-199 1), Department ofBiological Sciences, Butler University, Indianapolis, Indiana 46208 USA. ARCHIVIST: Vincent D. Roth, Box 136, Portal, Arizona 85632 USA. DIRECTORS: Petra Sierwald (1989-1991), William A. Shear (1989-1991), Matthew H. Greenstone (1990-1992). HONORARY MEMBERS: C. D. Dondale, W. J. Gertsch, H. Homann, H. W. Levi, A. F. Millidge, M. Vachon, T. Yaginuma. Cover illustration: Female Phidippus mystaceus, (Araneae, Salticidae), Eastern USA, by G. B. Edwards. THIS PUBLICATION IS PRINTED ON ACID-FREE PAPER. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:1-3 ON SOUTH AMERICAN TEMINIUS (ARANEAE, MITURGIDAE) Norman I. Platnick: Department of Entomology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024 USA Martin J. Eamirez: Museo Argentine de Ciencias Naturales, Av. Angel Gallardo 470, Buenos Aires 1405 Argentina Abstract. The Paraguayan species Teminius agalenoides (Badcock), originally described from juveniles only, is removed from the synonymy of T. insularis (Lucas) and considered valid. The Argentine species Philisca filixnotaia Mello-Leitao is transferred to Teminius and placed as a junior synonym of T. agalenoides-, males of that species are described for the first time. Syrisca fasciata Schenkel, from Venezuela, is newly synonymized with Teminius hirsutus (Petrunkevitch). Because the American spiders of the genus Teminius have a complex nomenclatural history, at the specific, generic, and familial levels, nu- merous synonyms were recognized in a recent review (Platnick & Shadab 1989). Since the pub- lication of that review, additional information on South American members of the genus has come to light, including Paraguayan and Argen- tine collections (some of which were previously misplaced in the genus Philisca) that include a fourth valid species of Teminius. We also note here some errors and omissions in that review. In addition to material in the collections of the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) and the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales (MACN), types and other specimens were kindly made available by P. Hillyard of the Natural History Museum, London (BMNH), J. A. Ko- chalka of the Inventario Biologico Nacional, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (IBNP), L. L. Baert of the Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Bel- gique, Brussels (IRSN), R. Arrozpide of the Mu- seo de La Plata (MLP), and C. Stocker of the Naturhistorisches Museum, Basel (NMB). We thank M. U. Shadab (AMNH) for help with il- lustrations. Teminius hirsutus (Petrunkevitch) Although listed as a new combination by Plat- nick & Shadab (1989:9), this name was in fact used earlier (in the family Gnaphosidae) by Kraus (1955:40, figs. 114-115), who erroneously con- sidered Petrunkevitch’s original males and fe- males not to be conspecific, but who did point out that his own females resemble those of Syr- isca pulchra Petrunkevitch (which was synony- mized with T. hirsutus by Platnick & Shadab). Through a clerical error, an additional syn- onym was unfortunately omitted from the re- view. The female holotype of Syrisca fasciata Schenkel (1953:45, fig. 39), taken in El Pozon, Acosta, Falcon, Venezuela (NMB), has been ex- amined. It has the distinctive, medially arched spermathecae of T. hirsutus, and Schenkel’s name is here placed as a junior synonym of T. hirsutus (NEW SYNONYMY). Teminius insularis (Lucas) This widespread species occurs in Florida, the Greater Antilles, and throughout tropical South America. Examination of the available Argen- tine material indicates that it is probably con- fined to the extreme northern and eastern por- tions of that country; the confirmed Argentine and Paraguayan records are listed here. Specimens examined.— ARGENTINA: Chaco: El Pintado, Sept. 1959 (A. Bachmann), 1 male (MACN); Gancedo (M. Biraben), 1 female (MLP). Corrientes: San Cosme, 1937 (J. Wurth), 1 female (MACN); Solan (M. Biraben), 1 female (MLP). EntreRws: Concepcion del Uruguay, Nov. 1963 (E. A. Maury), 1 female (MACN); Parque Nacional El Palmar (M. Biraben), 1 female (MLP), Feb. 1981 (P. A. Goloboff), 1 male (MACN), Nov. 1988 (M. E. Galiano), 1 female (MACN). Jujuy: Fraile Pintado, Oct. 1967 (E. A. Mau- ry), 1 male, 1 female (MACN); San Salvador de Jujuy, 17 Jan. 1966 (E. A. Maury), 5 females (MACN). Mi- siones: Candelaria, Dec. 1943 (J. M. Viana), 1 female (MACN); Eldorado, 1 Sept.-15 Nov. 1964 (A. Ko- vacs), 2 females (AMNH); San Javier, Dec. 1948 (M. Biraben), 1 female (MACN). PARAGUAY: Central: 2 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 1-4.— Teminius agalenoides (Badcock): 1, left male palp, ventral view; 2, same, retrolateral view; 3, epigynum, ventral view; 4, same, dorsal view. Asuncion, 26 Mar. 1985 (J. A. Kochalka), 1 female (IBNP); Itagua, 27 Sept. 1985 (J. A. Kochalka), 1 fe- male (IBNP); San Lorenzo, 29 Dec. 1985-July 1986 (J. A. Kochalka), 3 males (IBNP). Concepcion: no spe- cific locality, Nov.- 15 Dec. 1988 (J. A. Kochalka), 3 males (IBNP). Presidente Hayes: Ruta Trans-Chaco, km. 20 to 130, 25 July 1981 (J. A. Kochalka), 1 female (IBNP). Teminius agalenoides (Badcock), new combination Figs. 1-4 Syrisca agalenoides Badcock, 1932:32 (two juvenile syntypes from Nanahua, Presidente Hayes, Para- guay, in BMNH, examined). Philisca filixnotata Mello-Leitao, 1938:1 15 (juvenile holotype from Monte Veloz, Buenos Aires, Argen- tina, in MLP, examined); Mello-Leitao, 1941:176, fig. 66. NEW SYNONYMY. Teminius insularis: Platnick & Shadab, 1989:4 (in part). Diagnosis.— Males can be distinguished from those of the other known species of Teminius by the greatly widened median tegular apophysis of the palp (Fig. 1), females by the posteriorly wid- ened and elevated anterior epigynal extension and the w-shaped median epigynal plate (Fig. 3). Unfortunately, the types of both specific names are juveniles (the holotype of P. filixnotata, listed by Mello-Leitao, 1 938, as a female, is not adult). As those types do appear to belong to Teminius, and were collected within the range of this spe- cies, it seems best to consider Badcock’s and Mel- lo-Leitao’s names synonymous, particularly as the female figured (but not described) by Mello- Leitao (1941) belongs to this species as well. Measurements are in mm. Male (Guayapa).— Total length 9.08. Cara- pace 4.24 long, 3.26 wide. Femur II 3.38 long. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.15, ALE 0.15, PME 0.13, PLE 0.13; AME-AME 0.09, AME- ALE 0.06, PME-PME 0.16, PME-PLE 0.21, ALE-PLE 0.09; MOQ length 0.43, front width 0.38, back width 0.4 1 . Leg spination (only surfaces bearing spines listed): femora: I dl-1-0, pO-0-2; II dl-1-0, pO-1-2; III dl-1-1, pl-1-2, rO- 1-2; IV dl-1-1, pO-1-2, rO-0-2; tibiae: I pi -0-1, v2-2-lp; II pO-0-1, vlr-2-lp; III, IV dl-1-0, pl- 1-1, v2-2-2, rO-1-1; metatarsi: I, II v2-0-0; III pl-2-1, V2-0-2, rl-2-1; IV p2-2-2, v2-2-2, r2-2- 2. Median tegular apophysis wide, complexly folded (Fig. 1); retrolateral tibial apophysis with dorsally directed hook (Fig. 2). Female (Guayapa). — Total length 12.1 1. Car- apace 5.03 long, 4.09 wide. Femur II 3.45 long. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.16, ALE PLATNICK & RAMiREZ-TEMINIUS (MITURGIDAE) 3 0.18, PME 0.13, PLE 0.17; AME-AME 0.16, AME-ALE 0.10, PME-PME 0.24, PME-PLE 0.32, ALE-PLE 0.16; MOQ length 0.54, front width 0.48, back width 0.50. Leg spination: fem- ora: I, II dl-1-0, pO-0-1; III dl-1-1, pl-1-2, rO- 1- 1; IV dl-1-1, pO-1-1, rO-0-1; tibiae: I, II vlr- Ir-O; III pl-1-1, V2-2-2, rO-1-1; IV pl-1-1, v2- 2- 2, rl-1-1; metatarsi: I, II vlr-0-0; III pi -2-1, V2-0-2, r 1-2-1; IV p2-2-l, v2-2-2, r2-2-2. An- terior epigynal extension elevated, widened pos- teriorly (Fig. 3); spermathecal ducts coiled (Fig. 4). Distribution.— Known only from Argentina and western Paraguay; probably allopatric with T. insularis, occurring to the south and west of that species. Specimens examined.— ARGENTINA; Buenos Aires: Zelaya, Dec. 1938 (Heffer), 1 female (MACN). Chaco: Pmedo(M. Biraben), 1 female (MLP). La Rioja: Guay- apa, Patquia, 23 Jan. 1962 (L. Yiroff), 1 male (MACN), Oct. 1965 (E. A. Maury), 1 male, 4 females (MACN), Mar. 1968, 1 female (MACN); Tinogasta, 1947 (J. Cranwell), 1 female (MACN). Salta: Rosario de la Frontera (M. Biraben), 2 females (MLP); Salta, 1 fe- male (AMNH). Santa Fe: Calchaqui (M. Biraben), 1 female (MLP); Constanza (M. Biraben), 1 female (MLP); Departamento de Vera, Sept. 1945 (A. Giai, J. Cran- well), 4 females (MACN). Santiago del Estero: Colonia Dora (J. W. Abalos), 1 female (MLP); Girardet, Nov. 1939 (M. Biraben), 1 female (MLP); Nasal6, Nov. 1939 (M. Biraben), 1 female (MLP); Quimili, Nov. 1939 (M. Biraben), 1 male, 1 female (MLP); Rumi Punco (M. Biraben), 2 females (MLP). PARAGUAY: Chaco: Cer- ro Le6n, Parque Nacional Defensores del Chaco, 18- 27 Nov. 1984 (J. A. Kochalka), 1 male (IBNP); Mad- rej6n, Parque Nacional Defensores del Chaco, 5-17 Dec. 1981 (J. A. Kochalka), 1 male, 1 female (IBNP); Misidn Cue, Tribu Nueva, 1-6 Sept. 1982 (J. A. Ko- chalka), 1 female (IBNP). Nueva Asuncion: Estancia La Madelon, elev. 320 m, 21 May 1984 (L. L. Baert, J.-P. Maelfait, 1 female (IRSN). Presidente Hayes: 25 Laguas, 11-12 July 1983 (J. A. Kochalka), 1 female (IBNP). LITERATURE CITED Badcock, H. D. 1932. Arachnida from the Paraguayan Chaco. J. Linnean Soc. London (Zool.) 38:1-48. Kraus, O. 1955. Spinnen aus El Salvador (Arachno- idea, Araneae). Abh. Senckenb. Naturforsch. Ges., 493:1-112. Mello-Ixitao, C. F. 1938. Algunas aranas nuevas de la Argentina. Rev. Mus. La Plata (N.S., Zool.), 1:89- 118. Mello-Leitao, C. F. 1941. Las aranas de Cdrdoba, La Rioja, Catamarca, Tucuman, Salta y Jujuy colec- tadas por los Profesores Biraben. Rev. Mus. La Plata (N.S., Zool.), 2:99-198. Platnick, N. 1. & M. U. Shadab. 1989. A review of the spider genus Teminius (Araneae, Miturgidae). Amer. Mus. Novitates, 2963:1-12. Schenkel, E. 1953. Bericht iiber einige Spinnentiere aus Venezuela. Verb. Naturf Ges. Basel, 64:1-57. Manuscript received April 1 990, revised May 1 990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:4-28 SYSTEMATIC STUDIES ON THE NITIDULUS GROUP OF THE GENUS VAEJOVIS, WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF SEVEN NEW SPECIES (SCORPIONES, VAEJOVIDAE) W. David Sissom: Department of Biology, Elon College, Elon College, North Carolina 27244 USA Abstract. New diagnostic characters for the Vaejovis nitidulus group are given, and seven new species from Mexico are described: V. curvidigitus from Guerrero and Morelos; V. kochi from Hidalgo and Mexico; V. mitchelli from San Luis Potosi and Queretaro; V. platnicki from San Luis Potosi and Tamaulipas; V. pococki from San Luis Potosi and Queretaro; V. rubrimanus from Nuevo Leon; and V. solegladi from Oaxaca and Puebla. New records are given for V. nitidulus Koch, V. nigrescens Pocock, V. intermedins Borelli, V. decipiens Hoffmann, and V. peninsularis Williams. Finally, hemispermatophores are described and illustrated for seven species, and preliminary observations on their potential usefulness in species and species group taxonomy are presented. The nitidulus group is a significant and diverse element of the genus Vaejovis in mainland Mex- ico. The group was established by Sissom and Francke (1985), although the precedent for its recognition was set by Hoffmann (1931) in his key to species of Vaejovis from Mexico. Sissom and Francke (1985) assigned eleven taxa to this group, including some species previously as- signed to other groups. The present treatment identifies some new important characters shared by members of the group, provides description of seven new species, and indicates new records for several previously known species. The species of the nitidulus group occur mainly in the mountainous regions from southwestern United States to central Oaxaca, Mexico. They are generally found on moderate to steep slopes characterized by arid to semiarid vegetation, al- though some may be found in slopes dominated by pines at higher elevations. There, they may seek refuge in cracks and crevices of near- vertical cliffs or deep in the layers of rock on the surface of the slopes during the daylight hours. They emerge at night shortly after the onset of dark- ness, but remain on the surface for brief periods. These habits make them difficult to collect by rock-rolling techniques, which is perhaps the main reason they are poorly represented in mu- seum collections. Some species may also be lo- cally rare or exhibit such sporadic surface oc- currence that they appear to be rare. A number of characters shared by members of the group have been further studied since the diagnosis for the group first appeared (Sissom & Francke 1985). These characters, which are also diagnostic, are as follows: (1) the carapace is ob- tusely emarginate, with a distinct anteromedian notch; (2) the genital operculi of the female pos- sess a membranous longitudinal connection on the anterior two-thirds to four-fifths; (3) the pec- tinal teeth of the female are all subequal in size; (4) the cheliceral movable finger bears a well de- veloped serrula on the ventrodistal aspect; (5) the ventral spinule row of tarsomere II of the legs is flanked distally by a single pair of spines; (6) the male hemispermatophore bears a two- pronged hook along the ental (= medial) margin of the distal lamina (this hook is positioned on the dorsal face of the blade); (7) the capsular region of the hemispermatophore is well devel- oped, with median, basal, inner, and outer lobes present (sometimes accessory lobes are present as well); and (8) the ental process of the inner hemispermatophoric lobe has a smooth margin (i.e., it does not bear a row of booklets). METHODS Terminology for general morphology follows that of Stahnke (1970) with the following excep- tions: terminology for metasomal and pedipalpal carinae is after Francke (1977) and trichobothrial nomenclature is after Vachon (1974), except that the fourth pedipalpal segment is considered the patella, rather than the tibia, to be consistent with Stahnke’s terminology. Hemispermatophores are described and illus- SISSOM- SYSTEM ATICS OF THE VAEJOVIS NITIDULUS GROUP 5 trated for seven species for which there was suf- ficient male material available to allow dissec- tion of one or more specimens. On each specimen, the right hemispermatophore is dissected from the body as described by Lamoral (1979:522, fig. 74), except that upon removal, the paraxial organ is retained intact. In lieu of dissecting the tissues of the paraxial organ away from the hem- ispermatophore, the entire structure is cleared and viewed in clove oil (Sissom et al. 1990). An advantage gained by this technique is that the hemispermatophore will not be accidentally damaged by further dissection. This is consid- ered important in cases where only one or a few male specimens are known and their hemisper- matophores, consequently, are not expendable. A discussion of hemispermatophore morphology is provided in a separate section following the species treatments; the terminology applied to hemispermatophore structures, modified slightly from Lamoral (1979) and Francke (1979), is out- lined there. Vmj&vis cmrvidigitms, new species Figs. 1-10; 71, 72 Type data. — Holotype male from Taxco, Guerrero, Mexico (18“33’N:99°36’W), 3 May 1963 (W. J. Gertsch and W. Ivie). Deposited in the American Museum of Natural History, New York, Etymology. —The specific name is derived from the Latin words curvus, meaning curved or bent, and digitus, meaning finger, which describes the distinct scalloping of the male chela fingers. Distribution.— • Fflejovis curvidigitus is known from several localities in the state of Morelos and from the Taxco area in northern Guerrero, Mexico. Diagnosis.— Adults 30-40 mm in length. Base color orange brown with distinct dusky mark- ings. Stemite VII with lateral keels weak to mod- erate, granular. Pectinal tooth count 18-21 in males, 16-18 in females. Metasomal segment III length/width 0.83-0.93 {N= 1 1); V iength/width 1.67-1.85 (iV= 1 1). Ventrolateral metasomal ca- rinae moderate, granular to finely crenulate; ven- tral submedian carinae obsolete on I-III, often present, but faint on III and IV, Pedipaip patella with 2 esb trichobothria; dorsoextemal caiina of patella moderate, weakly crenulate. Pedipaip chela with dorsal marginal and dorsointemal ca- rinae weak, granular; keels of outer palm essen- tially obsolete. Chela fixed finger with six sub- rows of denticles; movable finger with six subrows and seven inner accessory granules; fingers of male distinctly scalloped. Chela length/width 3.40-3.75 in males (N = 4), 3.73-4.20 in females {N = 7); fixed finger length/carapace length 0.74- 0.86 {N = 1 1); femur length/carapace length 0.88- 0.95 (V= 11). Description. —Based on adults; parenthetical statements refer to females. Measurements are given in Table 1. Coloration: Base color of carapace, tergites, and metasoma rich to dark orange brown with dis- tinct dusky markings. Tergites with two dark submedian stripes and pale orange center stripe. Distal metasomal segments darker than preced- ing ones; telson lighter orange brown. Pedipalps yellow brown to light orange brown, contrast- ingly lighter than body. Legs light yellow brown or orange brown. Prosoma: Anterior margin of carapace ob- tusely emarginate; median notch weak, shallow. Entire carapacial surface finely granular. Mesosoma: Median carina on tergite I obso- lete; on II-VI weak, granular; tergite VII penta- carinate, with median carina weak, granular and lateral carinae moderate, serrate. Pectinal teeth numbering 18-21 in males, 16-18 in females. Stemites III-VI smooth, sparsely setose; stemite VII with pair of moderate (weak), granular lateral carinae. Metasoma: Segments I-IV: Dorsolateral cari- nae strong, crenulate to serrate; distalmost den- ticles on I-IV distinctly enlarged, spinoid. Lateral supramedian carinae on I-III strong, crenulate; on IV moderate, granular; distalmost denticles on I-III enlarged, spinoid and on IV flared. Lat- eral inframedian carinae on I complete, strong, crenulate; on II-III present on posterior one-third, strong, crenulate; on IV absent. Ventrolateral ca- rinae on I-IV moderate, granular to finely cren- ulate. Ventral submedian carinae obsolete on I- III, sometimes faint on IV, granular. Dorsal and lateral intercarinal spaces with scattered granu- lation. Segment V (Fig. i): Dorsolateral carinae moderate, crenulate on proximal one-third, granular posteriorly. Lateromedian carinae pres- ent on anterior three-fourths, granular. Ventro- lateral and ventromedian carinae moderate, crenulate to serrate. Intercarinal spaces with scat- tered coarse granulation. Telson: (Fig. 1). Ventral surface of vesicle with subtle irregular punctations and granulation; vesicle with 12-16 pairs setae. Pedipaip: Trichobothrial pattern of pedipalps (Figs. 2-9) Type C, orthobothriotaxic (Vachon 6 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures l-lO.—Morphoiogy of Vaejovis curvidigitus, new species, from southern Mexico: i, lateral aspect of metasomal segments IV and V, and telson; 2, dorsal aspect of pedipalp femur; 3, dorsal aspect of pedipalp patella; 4, external aspect of pedipalp patella; 5, ventral aspect of pedipalp patella; 6, dorsal aspect of pedipalp chela; 7, external aspect of pedipalp chela; 8, ventral aspect of pedipalp chela; 9, dentition pattern on fixed finger of pedipalp chela; 1 0, dentition pattern on movable finger of pedipalp chela. 1974). Femur (Fig. 2): carinae granulose; internal face with about 12-15 medium-sized granules; dorsal face with scattered coarse granulation. Pa- tella (Figs. 3-5): dorsointemal and ventrointemal carinae strong, crenulate; dorsoextemal and ven- troextemal carinae moderate, crenulate; inner face with moderate basal tubercle and an oblique keel of 8-10 large granules; dorsal face without con- spicuous granulation; external face moderately coarsely granular. Chela (Figs. 6-10) with dorsal marginal, dorsointemal, ventrointemal, and ventroextemal carinae weak, granular; digital Ca- rina vestigial, smooth on distal portion of manus; other carinae obsolete. Dentate margin of chela fixed finger with primary denticle row divided into six subrows by five enlarged denticles; six SISSOM- SYSTEM ATICS OF THE VAEJOVIS NITIDULUS GROUP 7 Table L— Measurements in mm and pectinal tooth counts of new species of Vaejovis: V. curvidigitus, V. kochi, V. mitchelli, and V. pococki. V. curvidigitus V. kochi V. mitchelli V. pococki Holotype Paratype Holotype Paratype Holotype Paratype Holotype Paratype male female male female male female female male Total length 32.2 32.8 48.4 46.9 56.3 68.5 52.5 40.6 Carapace length 4.2 4.4 5.7 5.8 6.7 8.5 6.5 5.0 Mesosoma length 9.4 10.8 14.3 15.1 15.8 21.7 16.9 12.1 Metasoma length 14.2 13.4 21.7 19.3 26.4 29.6 22.5 18.2 I length 1.8 1.7 2.8 2.4 3.4 3.9 3.0 2.4 I width 2.5 2.5 3.8 3.7 3.6 4.6 3.8 3.0 II length 2.1 2.0 3.3 2.9 4.1 4.6 3.4 2.8 II width 2.6 2.6 3.9 3.5 3.6 4.5 3.6 2.9 III length 2.4 2.2 3.5 3.2 4.4 4.9 3.8 3.1 III width 2.6 2.5 3.9 3.6 3.4 4.4 3.6 2.9 IV length 3.4 3.1 5.0 4.5 6.2 6.7 5.1 4.3 IV width 2.6 2.5 3.9 3.6 3.4 4.2 3.5 2.9 V length 4.5 4.4 7.1 6.3 8.3 9.5 7.2 5.6 V width 2.5 2.5 3.7 3.6 3.4 4.0 3.5 2.8 Telson length 4.4 4.2 6.7 6.7 7.4 8.7 6.6 5.3 Vesicle length 2.3 2.6 4.5 4.2 4.8 5.8 4.0 3.4 Vesicle width 1.8 1.7 2.8 2.6 2.4 3.0 2.8 2.2 Vesicle depth 1.3 1.1 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.7 2.0 1.6 Aculeus length 2.1 1.6 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.9 2.6 1.9 Pedipalp length 14.2 14.7 21.1 20.0 25.9 31.3 22.8 18.0 Femur length 3.8 3.9 5.7 5.3 7.0 8.4 6.0 4.8 Femur width 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.6 2.2 1.7 1.4 Patella length 4.0 4.1 5.9 5.7 7.4 9.0 6.3 5.0 Patella width 1.2 1.3 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.4 2.0 1.6 Chela length 6.4 6.7 9.5 9.0 11.5 13.9 10.5 8.1 Chela width 1.7 1.6 2.6 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.2 2.2 Chela depth 1.9 1.8 3.0 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.4 Mov. fing. length 4.0 4.3 5.9 5.8 7.5 9.2 7.0 5.1 Fix. fing. length 3.1 3.5 4.7 4.7 6.4 7.8 5.7 4.0 Pectinal teeth (1/r) 19-19 16-17 22-22 20-20 28-28 25-26 21-21 21-20 inner accessory granules (Fig. 9). Dentate margin of chela movable finger with primary denticle row divided into six subrows by five enlarged denticles; seven inner accessory granules (Fig. 1 0). Fingers of male with distinct scalloping (Fig. 7). Hemispermatophore: (Figs. 71, 72). Distal lamina relatively short, slender (laminar length/ width = 6.63, = 1), and slightly curved; inner lobe of capsule long, tapered; median and basal lobes small, rounded. Variation.— Variation in pectinal tooth counts is as follows: in males, one comb with 1 8 teeth, four with 19, two with 20, and one with 21; in females, six combs with 16 teeth, three with 17, and three with 1 8 (the teeth of one female could not be counted). Morphometric variation is sum- marized in the diagnosis. Some of the specimens from Morelos are darker brown than the major- ity of the specimens examined. This is almost certainly due to strong discoloration from poor preservation. Comparisons. — Vaejovis curvidigitus is similar to V. kochi and V. nigrescens. From V. kochi it may be easily distinguished by its smaller body size, lower pectinal tooth counts, and the pos- session of two, rather than three, patellar esb trichobothria. Further, the ventrolateral and ventral submedian carinae of metasomal seg- ments I-IV are considerably more reduced in V. kochi; the keels of segment V are likewise re- duced in that species. From V. nigrescens, V. curvidigitus may be distinguished by its (1) more prominent scallop in the male chela fingers; (2) its smaller body size; (3) more robust pedipalp chelae; (4) its pro- 8 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY portionately shorter, thicker metasomal seg- ments, with segment III wider than long; (5) the presence of crenulate, rather than smooth, ven- trolateral carinae on the metasoma; (6) the fre- quent presence of faint ventral submedian cari- nae on metasomal segments III and IV; and (7) the presence of a distinct pattern of dusky mark- ings on the tergites of the adult. Specimens examined.— MEXICO: Guerrero: Taxco, 18°33’N:99°36’W, 3 May 1963 (W. J. Gertsch and W. Ivie), 1 male holotype (AMNH), October 1945 (L. Isaacs), 1 female paratype (AMNH), 22 August 1976 (E. S. Ross), 1 female paratype (CAS). Morelos: Cuer- navaca, September 1946 (H. Field), 3 male paratypes (FMNH), November 1949 (N. L. H. Krauss), 1 female paratype (USNM), Tepoztlan, 1946-1947 (H. Field), 4 female paratypes (FMNH). Vaejovis kochi, new species Figs. 1 1-20 Vejovis nitidulus nigrescens, Hoffmann 1937:204 (?). Vaejovis nitidulus nigrescens, Diaz Najera 1964:24; 1975:25. Type data. — Holotype male (RS-4036) from Progreso, Hidalgo, Mexico, 5 July 1963 (L. Maz- zotti). Deposited in the Museum National d’His- toire Naturelle, Paris. Etymology.— The specific name is a patronym honoring Carl Ludwig Koch for his contributions to arachnology in the 1 800’s. Distribution.— Known from southeastern Hi- dalgo and northeastern Distrito Federal, Mexico. Diagnosis.— Adults 45-50 mm in length. Base color brown, lacking conspicuous dusky mark- ings. Stemite VII with lateral keels weak, smooth. Pectinal tooth count 22 in males, 19-21 in fe- males. Metasomal segment III length/width 0.89- 0.92 {N = 3); V length/width 1.7- 1.9 {N = 3). Ventrolateral carinae on I-III weak, smooth; on IV essentially obsolete. Ventral submedian ca- rinae on I-IV obsolete. Keels of segment V ob- solete to weak. Pedipalps: patella with 3 esb tri- chobothria; fixed finger of chela with primary denticle row divided into six subrows; movable finger with six subrows and seven inner accessory granules. Male chela palm somewhat rounded, external and dorsal carinae obsolete; fingers dis- tinctly scalloped. Chela length/width ratio 3.52- 3.65 in males (N = 2), 3.91 in female (N = 1); fixed finger length/carapace length 0.81-0.85 {N = 3); femur length/carapace length 0.91-1.00 {N = 3). Description.— Based on adults; parenthetical statements refer to females. Measurements ap- pear in Table 1. Coloration: Carapace and tergites brown, lack- ing noticeable dusky markings. Metasomal seg- ments I-III orange brown; IV-V more reddish brown, especially laterally and ventrally. Telson reddish brown with dark brown aculeus. Pedi- palp femur yellow brown; patella yellow brown basally, orange brown distally. Chela more or less uniformly reddish to orange brown, slightly darker at base of fingers. Legs yellowish or light yellow brown. Prosoma: Anterior margin of carapace ob- tusely emarginate, median notch weak. Inter- ocular area smooth; lateral and posterior portions of carapace densely, coarsely granular. Mesosoma: Median carina on tergites I-III ob- solete, on IV- VI weak, smooth; tergite VII pen- tacarinate with median carina weak, smooth (finely granular) and lateral carinae moderate to strong, crenulate. Pectinal teeth numbering 22 in males, 19-21 in females. Stemites III-VI smooth, sparsely setose; VII with pair of weak, smooth lateral keels. Metasoma: Segments I-IV: Dorsolateral cari- nae strong, crenulate (serrate); distalmost den- ticles on I-IV enlarged, spinoid. Lateral supra- median carinae on I strong, crenulate; on II moderate, finely granular; on III-IV weak to moderate, smooth (on I crenulate, on II-IV finely granular); distalmost denticles on I-III enlarged, spinoid; on IV widely flared. Lateral inframedian carinae on I complete, strong, finely granular (crenulate); on II-III present on distal one-fourth of segment, moderate to strong, smooth (finely granular); on IV absent. Ventrolateral carinae on I-III weak, smooth; on IV essentially obsolete. Ventral submedian carinae on I-IV obsolete. Dorsal and lateral intercarinal spaces sparsely, coarsely granular. Segment V (Fig. 1 1): Dorso- lateral carinae weak, granular on anterior one- third to one-half Lateromedian carinae obsolete. Ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae weak, smooth to finely granular. Intercarinal spaces smooth, lustrous. Telson: (Fig. 1 1). Ventral surface of vesicle smooth, with about 12-15 pairs setae. Pedipalp: Trichobothrial pattern (Figs. 12-19) Type C, neobothriotaxic (Vachon 1974): patella with 3 esb trichobothria (Fig. 14). Femur (Fig. 12): carinae strong, granulose; internal face with 8-10 large, pointed granules; dorsal face mod- erately, coarsely granular. Patella (Figs. 13-15): dorsointemal and ventrointemal carinae strong. SISSOM- SYSTEM ATICS OF THE VAEJOVIS NITIDULUS GROUP 9 Figures 1 1-20. —Morphology of Vaejovis kochi, new species, from Hidalgo, Mexico: 11, lateral aspect of metasomal segments IV and V, and telson; 12, dorsal aspect of pedipalp femur; 13, dorsal aspect of pedipalp patella; 1 4, external aspect of pedipalp patella; 1 5, ventral aspect of pedipalp patella; 1 6, dorsal aspect of pedipalp chela; 17, external aspect of pedipalp chela; 18, ventral aspect of pedipalp chela; 19, dentition pattern on fixed finger of pedipalp chela; 20, dentition pattern on movable finger of pedipalp chela. crenulate; dorsoexternal carina moderate, smooth; ventroextemal carina moderate, gran- ular. Inner face with oblique longitudinal carina of 8 larger and 3-4 smaller granules; dorsal and ventral faces smooth; external face with scattered granulation. Chela (Figs. 1 6-20): Dorsal marginal carina weak, finely granular; dorsointemal carina weak, with a few larger, rounded granules; ven- trointemal carina weak, granular; other carinae essentially obsolete. Dentate margin of fixed fin- ger with primary denticle row divided into six subrows by five enlarged denticles; six inner ac- cessory granules (Fig. 19). Dentate margin of movable finger with primary denticle row divid- ed into six subrows by five enlarged denticles; seven inner accessory granules (Fig. 20). Fingers 10 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY of male with distinct scalloping. Chela relatively robust (Figs. 16-18). Hemispermatophore: Not dissected due to scarcity of material. Variation.— Only two adult males, a single adult female, and a number of late instar juvenile females were available for study. Juveniles differ from adults primarily in coloration and mor- phometries: the body is yellowish brown with distinct dusky markings; the distal metasomal segments are more reddish brown, contrasting with the rest of the body; the pedipalps are yel- lowish; and the pedipalps are more slender. Pec- tinal tooth count variation in all specimens is as follows: in males, four combs with 22 teeth; in females, four combs with 1 9 teeth, ten with 20, and four with 21. Morphometric variation is summarized in the diagnosis. Comparisons. — Vaejovis kochi is most similar to V. platnicki, V. nigrescens, and V. curvidigitus. From V. platnicki, it can be easily distinguished by its larger body size, uniform reddish brown coloration, more robust pedipalp chelae, and higher pectinal tooth counts (22 in males and 19- 21 in females, rather than 16 in males and 13- 1 5 in females). Vaejovis kochi is easily distinguished from both V. nigrescens and V. curvidigitus by the posses- sion of three, rather than two, patellar esb tri- chobothria. From V. nigrescens, it may be fur- ther distinguished by the stronger scallop in the male chela fingers and the more robust chela palm. Metasomal segment V in V. kochi has weak to obsolete keels; in V. nigrescens, the dorsal and lateral keels are moderate, and the ventrolateral and ventromedian keels are strong. Specimens examined.— MEXICO: no locality data, 1 male paratype (RS-4086)(MNHN). Hidalgo: Progre- so, 5 July 1963 (L. Mazzotti), 1 male holotype (RS- 4036)(MNHN), Cuautepec, 20 March 1964 (no col- lector), 1 female, 1 juv. paratypes (RS-4287)(MNHN), 10 km NW Atotonilco El Grande, surface above Pu- ente de Dios, 19 March 1981 (J. Reddell), 3 subadult female paratypes (WDS). Distrito Federal: Teotihu- acan, 14 November 1973 (E.-G. Burmeister), 3 sub- adult female paratypes (WDS), San Juan Teotihuacan, 28 July 1947 (collector unknown), 1 subadult female paratype (AMNH). Vaejovis mitchelli, new species Figs. 21-30; 79, 80 Type data. — Holotype male from 8 mi. W Jal- pan, Queretaro, Mexico, 10 March 1977 (R. W. Mitchell, et al.). Deposited in the American Mu- seum of Natural History, New York. Etymology.— The specific epithet is a patron- ym honoring Robert W. Mitchell, collector of most of the known specimens of this taxon, for his outstanding contributions to arachnology and Mexican cave biology. Distribution. — Known from the type locality and southeastern San Luis Potosi. Diagnosis.— Adults 50-70 mm in length. Base color dark orange brown to dark brown with faint underlying dusky markings. Stemite VII with lat- eral keels moderate, finely granular. Pectinal tooth counts 27-28 in males, 25-26 in females. Me- tasomal segment III length/width 1.28-1.41 in males {N = 3), 1.10-1.13 in females {N = 3); segment V length/width 2.45-2.58 in males {N = 3), 2.26-2.36 in females {N = 3). Metasoma with ventrolateral carinae moderate, smooth to finely granular on I-IV; ventral submedian ca- rinae on I-IV obsolete or discernible as faint, smooth ridges. Pedipalp patella with 2 esb tri- chobothria; fixed finger with primary denticle row divided into seven subrows; movable finger with eight subrows and eight inner accessory granules; dorsal and external keels of palm reduced. Chela length/width 4.90-5.81 in males {N = 3), 5.43- 5.92 in females {N = 3); fixed finger length/car- apace length 0.91-1.08 (TV = 6); femur length/ carapace length 0.99-1.12 (TV = 6). Description.— Based on adults; parenthetical statements refer to females. Measurements are given in Table 1. Coloration: Carapace and tergites dark orange brown to dark brown with underlying dusky pat- tern. Metasoma: dark brown to dark orange brown, either uniformly colored or with seg- ments IV-V darker. Telson vesicle yellow orange or reddish. Pedipalp femur and patella light or- ange brown to brown, with variable underlying dusky markings. Pedipalp chela manus light or- ange brown; fingers brown basally, light yellow brown distally. Legs yellow brown (males) to brown (females) with dusky markings on prox- imal segments, uniformly yellowish on tibiae and tarsi. Prosoma: Anterior margin of carapace ob- tusely emarginate, median notch shallow. Inter- ocular area finely granular with some scattered coarse granules (smooth with few scattered coarse granules); remainder of carapace densely (sparse- ly), coarsely granular. Mesosoma: Median carina on tergites I-II ob- solete; on III faint; on IV- VI weak, granular. Ter- gite VII pentacarinate, with median carina mod- erate, granular; lateral carinae strong, crenulate to serrate. Pectinal teeth numbering 27-28 (25- SISSOM- SYSTEM ATICS OF THE VAEJOVIS NITIDULUS GROUP 11 Figures 2 1-30. —Morphology of Vaejovis mitchelli, new species, from Queretaro, Mexico: 21, lateral aspect of metasomal segments IV and V, and telson; 22, dorsal aspect of pedipalp femur; 23, dorsal aspect of pedipalp patella; 24, external aspect of pedipalp patella; 25, ventral aspect of pedipalp patella; 26, dorsal aspect of pedipalp chela; 27, external aspect of pedipalp chela; 28, ventral aspect of pedipalp chela; 29, dentition pattern on fixed finger of pedipalp chela; 30, dentition pattern on movable finger of pedipalp chela. 26). Stemites III-VI smooth, sparsely setose; VII with pair of moderate, finely granular lateral ca- rinae. Metasoma: Dorsolateral carinae strong, cren- ulate to serrate; distalmost denticles of dorsolat- eral carinae on I-III enlarged, spinoid; on seg- ment IV only slightly enlarged, spinoid. Lateral supramedian carinae on I-II strong, crenulate; on III-IV moderate, finely crenulate; distalmost denticles on I-III slightly enlarged, spinoid and on IV flared. Lateral inframedian carinae on I complete, strong, crenulate; on II present on pos- terior one-half, strong, crenulate; on III present on posterior one-fourth, moderate, crenulate; on IV absent. Ventrolateral carinae on I-IV mod- erate, smooth to finely granular. Ventral sub- median carinae on I-IV obsolete or present as very faint, smooth ridges. Dorsal and lateral in- tercarinal spaces with scattered coarse granules. Segment V (Fig. 21); Dorsolateral carinae mod- 12 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY erate, granular. Lateromedian carinae weak, granular, present on anterior three-fourths. Ven- trolateral and ventromedian carinae moderate, crenulate to serrate. Intercarinal spaces with scat- tered fine granulation. Telson: (Fig. 21). Ventral surface with small, irregularly spaced granules and punctations; about 25 pairs of setae. Pedipalp: Trichobothrial pattern (Figs. 22-29) Type C, orthobothriotaxic (Vachon 1974). Fe- mur (Fig. 22) with carinae strong, granulose; in- ternal face with 1 6-20 medium to large subcon- ical granules; dorsal face densely, finely granular. Patella (Figs. 23-25) dorsointemal, ventrointer- nal, and ventroextemal carinae strong, crenulate; dorsoextemal carina moderate, granular to weakly crenulate. Internal face with moderate basal tu- bercle and oblique longitudinal carina of 10-12 large, subconical granules. Dorsal face with scat- tered fine granules; external face with moderately dense coarse and fine granulation. Chela (Figs. 26-30). Dorsal marginal carina weak, granular. Dorsal secondary carina faint, smooth. Digital carina weak, smooth. External secondary carina obsolete. Ventroextemal carina weak, smooth. Ventromedian carina obsolete. Ventrointemal carina weak, essentially smooth. Dorsointemal carina moderate, with enlarged, sharp granules. Dentate margin of fixed finger with primary den- ticle row divided into seven subrows by six en- larged granules; six inner accessory granules (Fig. 29). Dentate margin of movable finger with pri- mary denticle row divided into eight subrows by seven enlarged granules; eight inner accessory granules (Fig. 30). Fingers of male with subtle scalloping. Chela slender with fingers long and tenuous (Figs. 26-28). Hemispermatophore: (Figs. 79, 80). Distal lamina relatively slender (laminar length/width = 6.48, N = 1), with slight tapering; inner lobe of capsule long, broad, slightly tapering distally; median and basal lobes rounded. Variation.— Variation in the pectinal tooth counts of the adult specimens examined is as follows: in males, two combs with 26 teeth and four with 27; in females, four combs with 25 teeth and two with 26. In addition, pectinal tooth counts of 20 neonates bom in the laboratory were also counted. Because neonates cannot be ac- curately sexed, the counts obtained include both males and females. There were 1 comb with 24 teeth, 13 combs with 25 teeth, 13 with 26 teeth, 3 with 27 teeth, and 10 with 28 teeth. Because pectinal tooth counts do not change after birth, these counts provide a reasonable estimate of variation in the pectinal tooth counts in this spe- cies, which was not possible using only the six adults. Morphometric variation is summarized in the diagnosis. Comparisons.— Faejovw mitchelU, V. nitidu- lus, and V. pococki are the only three species in the genus to have seven subrows on the pedipalp chela fixed finger. Vaejovis mitchelU may be eas- ily distinguished from V. nitidulus by its dark coloration, by having eight subrows of denticles on the movable finger and eight inner accessory granules (not seven subrows and seven inner ac- cessory granules), by having only two esb tricho- bothria on the patella, and by differences in ped- ipalp and metasomal morphometries. The movable finger characteristic also serves to distinguish V. mitchelU from V. pococki. In addition, pectinal tooth counts in V. mitchelU are distinctly higher than in V. pococki, and mor- phometries of the pedipalp chela and metasoma differ considerably between the two. The ven- trolateral carinae of metasomal segments I-IV are moderate in V. mitchelU, essentially obsolete in V. pococki. Carinal development on metaso- mal segment V is also stronger in V. mitchelU. Comments.— The type series, collected by Dr. Robert W. Mitchell and his 1977 Arachnology class at Texas Tech University, was returned to the laboratory alive after their capture. One of the females was observed mating on 1 3 March 1977 and subsequently gave birth to 39 offspring on 4 August 1977. Assuming the female had not been previously inseminated in the field, the ges- tation period was 144 days (= 4.5 months). A second female gave birth to 36 young shortly upon her return to the laboratory. Specimens examined.— MEXICO: Queretaro: 8 mi. W Jalpan, 10 March 1977 (R. W. Mitchell, et al.), 1 male holotype (AMNH), 1 male paratype, 2 female paratypes (AMNH-OFF), 1 female paratype (WDS). San Luis Potost Cueva de Cristian, 4 km E Xilitla, 4 January 1976 (A. Grubbs), 1 male paratype (WDS). Vaejovis platnicki, new species Figs. 31-40 Type data.— Holotype female from Guayla- lejo, Tamaulipas, Mexico, 18 February 1973 (J. P. Webb). Deposited in the American Museum of Natural History. Etymology.— The specific epithet is a patro- nym honoring Dr. Norman I. Platnick, curator SISSOM-SYSTEMATICS OF THE VAEJOVIS NITIDULUS GROUP 13 Figures 31-40.— Morphology of Vaejovis platnicki, new species, from Tamaulipas, Mexico: 31, lateral aspect of metasomal segments IV and V, and telson; 32, dorsal aspect of pedipalp femur; 33, dorsal aspect of pedipalp patella; 34, external aspect of pedipalp patella; 35, ventral aspect of pedipalp patella; 36, dorsal aspect of pedipalp chela; 37, external aspect of pedipalp chela; 38, ventral aspect of pedipalp chela; 39, dentition pattern on fixed finger of pedipalp chela; 40, dentition pattern on movable finger of pedipalp chela. of Arachnida at the American Museum of Nat- ural History, for his numerous contributions to arachnid systematics. Distribution. — Known only from southern T a- maulipas and northeastern San Luis Potosi. Diagnosis.— Adults 20-25 mm in length. Base color yellow brown to orange brown; carapace, tergites, and metasoma with strong variegated pattern. Pectinal tooth count 13-15 in females; stemite VII with carinae obsolete. Metasomal 14 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY segments I-IV with ventrolateral and ventral submedian carinae obsolete; segment V with ventrolateral carinae weak, granular to crenulate and ventromedian carina vestigial. Metasomal segment III length/width 0.77-0.80 (N = 6); V length/width 1.64-1.77 (N = 6). Pedipalp patella with 3 esb trichobothria. Pedipalp chela fixed finger with primary denticle row divided into six subrows; movable finger with six subrows and seven inner accessory granules. Chela manus with dorsal marginal and dorsointemal carinae weak, granular; other carinae obsolete. Chela length/ width 3.32-3.78 (N = 6); fixed finger length/car- apace length 0.62-0.65 {N = 6); pedipalp femur length/carapace length 0.73-0.79 {N = 6). Description. — Based on adult females; mea- surements appear in Table 2. Coloration: Base color of body light brown to orange brown; metasoma darker orange brown, especially distal segments. Carapace, tergites, and metasoma with strong variegated pattern; pedi- palps and legs with less distinct dusky markings. Prosoma: Anterior margin of carapace weakly emarginate; median notch vestigial. Carapace lustrous, sparsely granular. Mesosoma: Median carina on tergite I obso- lete, on II-VI weak, granular; tergite VII with median carina weak, granular and lateral pairs moderate, crenulate. Pectinal teeth numbering 13-15. Stemites III-VI smooth, sparsely setose, with suboval stigmata; VII with carinae obsolete. Metasoma: Segments I-IV; Dorsolateral cari- nae moderate, crenulate; distalmost denticles en- larged, spinoid. Lateral supramedian carinae on I-III strong, crenulate; on IV moderate, granular; distalmost denticles enlarged, spinoid on I-III, flared on IV. Lateral inframedian carinae on I complete, strong, crenulate; on II present on pos- terior one-half, strong, crenulate; on III present on posterior one-third, moderate, crenulate; on IV absent. Ventrolateral carinae essentially ob- solete (sometimes with a few small distal gran- ules on I-II); ventral submedian carinae obsolete. Intercarinal spaces smooth, lustrous. Segment V (Fig. 31): Dorsolateral carinae moderate, serrate proximally, granular distally. Lateromedian ca- rinae obsolete. Ventrolateral carinae weak, gran- ular to finely crenulate. Ventromedian carina vestigial, present only on distal one-half, weak, granular. Intercarinal spaces moderately granu- lar. Telson: (Fig. 3 1 ). Ventral aspect of vesicle with few irregularly spaced punctations; midline with a few small granules terminating in a subtle. pointed subaculear tubercle; about 20 pairs of setae. Pedipalp: Trichobothrial pattern (Figs. 32-39) Type C, neobothriotaxic (Vachon 1974); patella with three esb trichobothria (Fig. 34). Femur (Fig. 32): dorsointemal and ventrointemal carinae moderate, crenulate; dorsoextemal carina weak, granular; ventroextemal carina essentially ob- solete; inner face with about eight larger granules; dorsal face moderately granular. Patella (Figs. 33-35): Dorsointemal carina moderate, smooth to weakly crenulate; ventrointemal carina mod- erate, crenulate; dorsoextemal and ventroexter- nal carinae obsolete or faint, smooth; inner face with vestigial basal tubercle and oblique longi- tudinal carina of about 10 granules. Chela (Figs. 36-40): Dorsal marginal and dorsointemal ca- rinae weak, granular; others obsolete. Fixed fin- ger (Fig. 39) with primary row of denticles di- vided into six subrows by five enlarged denticles; six inner accessory granules. Movable finger (Fig. 40) with primary denticle row divided into six subrows by five enlarged denticles; seven inner accessory granules. Chela fingers ending in slight- ly enlarged, blade-like terminal denticles which overlap when chela closed. Hemispermatophore: Not dissected; males not available. Variation.— Pectinal tooth counts in adults and subadults varied as follows: in females, one comb with 13 teeth, eight with 14, and seven with 15. The first instar specimens from Guaylalejo had pectinal tooth counts of 1 5- 1 5, 1 5-??, and 16-16. Variation in morphometries is summarized in the diagnosis. Comparisons.— This species is quite distinct from all other nitidulus group species with six subrows of denticles on the chela fingers and three esb trichobothria on the pedipalp patella. In ca- rinal morphology of the metasoma, it is similar to V. kochi\ for characters to distinguish these species, see the “Comparisons” section under V. kochi. There is a strong superificial resemblance (small size and variegated pattern) between V. platnicki and V. bilineatus Pocock, which belongs to a different species group. The possession of six subrows of granules on the pedipalp chela fixed finger, the basal position of chela trichobothria ib and it, presence of pedipalpal carinae, and other characters diagnostic for the nitidulus group serve to distinguish these species. Specimens examined.— MEXICO: San Luis Potosr. El Tinieblo, March 1977 (R. W. Mitchell, et al.), 1 SISSOM- SYSTEM ATICS OF THE VAEJOVIS NITIDULUS GROUP 15 Table 2.— Measurements in mm and pectinal tooth counts of new species of Vaejovis: V. platnicki, V. rubriman- us, and V. solegladi. V. platnicki V. rubrimanus V. solegladi Holotype female Holotype male Paratype female Holotype male Paratype female Total length 25.4 45.0 58.8 41.2 46.1 Carapace length 3.3 5.2 7.1 5.5 5.8 Mesosoma length 8.7 12.7 18.5 11.8 14.8 Metasoma length 10.2 21.1 25.6 18.5 19.7 I length/width 1. 3/2.2 2.9/2.1 3.4/3. 8 2.4/3. 3 2.6/3.5 II length/width 1.4/2. 1 3.6/2.6 3.9/3.6 2.8/3.3 3.0/3.4 III length/ width 1.6/2. 1 3. 7/2.5 4.2/3.4 3.0/3. 2 3. 2/3.4 IV length/width 2.4/2. 1 4.7/2.4 5.9/3.3 4.2/3. 1 4.5/3. 3 V length/width 3. 5/2.1 6.3/2.3 8.2/3. 2 6.1/3. 1 6.4/3.2 Telson length 3.2 6.0 7.6 5.4 5.8 Vesicle length/ width 2.1/1. 3 4.0/2.0 4.8/2.7 1.212.2 3. 8/2.3 Vesicle depth 0.9 1.6 2.3 1.6 1.8 Aculeus length 1.0 2.0 2.8 2.2 2.1 Pedipalp length 9.7 20.5 25.9 18.9 20.6 Femur length/width 2.5/1.0 5.4/1.4 6.9/1.9 5.2/1. 3 5.6/1. 5 Patella length/width 2.8/1. 1 5. 7/1. 7 7. 1/2.2 5.4/1. 3 5. 8/1.6 Chela length/width 4.4/1.2 9.4/2.5 11.9/2.6 8.3/1. 7 9.2/1.8 Chela depth 1.3 2.7 3.0 1.8 2.0 Movable finger length 2.7 6.0 8.0 5.6 6.2 Fixed finger length 2.2 5.0 6.8 4.8 5.2 Pectinal teeth (It/rt) 15-14 27-28 26-26 18-18 18-19 paratype female (WDS). Tamaulipas: Guaylalejo, 18 February 1973 (J. P. Webb), 1 holotype female, 1 para- type female, 3 paratype first instars (AMNH), 1 para- type female (WDS), Tampico, no date (Palmer), one subadult paratype female (USNM), 1 7 mi. S Victoria, 28 December 1947 (no collector), 1 subadult paratype female (AMNH), 25 km S Cd. Victoria (under rock), 7 January 1987 (J. A. Nilsson), one paratype female (JAN), km 190, Highway 85, 18 February 1973 (C. McConnell), 1 paratype female (WDS). Vaejovis pococki, new species (Figs. 41-50, 83, 84) Vaejovis nitidulus nitidulus, Diaz Najera 1964:27; 1975: 30. Type data. — Holotype female (RS-4288) from Queretaro, Queretaro, Mexico, 5-23 August 1963 (collector unknown). Deposited in the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. Etymology.— The specific name is a patronym honoring Reginald I. Pocock for his numerous contributions to scorpion systematics at the turn of the century. Distribution.— Known from several localities in southern San Luis Potosi and western Que- retaro, Mexico. Diagnosis.— Adults 40-65 mm in length. Base color dark orange brown to reddish brown with faint dusky markings. Stemite VII with lateral keels faint to obsolete. Pectinal tooth counts 20- 21 in males, 19-21 in females. Metasomal seg- ment III length/width 1 .0 1 - 1 . 1 2 (V = 9); V length/ width 2.00-2. \9 {N = 9). Metasoma with ven- trolateral carinae on I-IV obsolete or weak, smooth; ventral submedian carinae on I-IV ob- solete. Metasomal segment V with keels weak to obsolete. Pedipalp patella with 2 esb trichoboth- ria; fixed finger with primary denticle row divid- ed into seven subrows; movable finger with seven subrows and seven inner accessory granules; dor- sal and external keels of palm obsolete or faint. Chela length/width 3.68-3.74 in males {N = 2), 4.38-4.86 in females {N= 7); pedipalp chela fixed finger length/carapace length 0.80-0.88 {N = 9); pedipalp femur length/carapace length 0.88-0.96 (V=9). Description. — Based on adults; measurements are given in Table 1. Coloration: Carapace and tergites orange brown to reddish brown with dusky underlying mark- ings. Metasomal segments I-III orange brown above, more reddish brown below; IV with ven- 16 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 41-50.— Morphology of Vaejovis pococki, new species, from Queretaro, Mexico: 41, lateral aspect of metasomal segments IV and V, and telson; 42, dorsal aspect of pedipalp femur; 43, dorsal aspect of pedipalp patella; 44, external aspect of pedipalp patella; 45, ventral aspect of pedipalp patella; 46, dorsal aspect of pedipalp chela; 47, external aspect of pedipalp chela; 48, ventral aspect of pedipalp chela; 49, dentition pattern on fixed finger of pedipalp chela; 50, dentition pattern on movable finger of pedipalp chela. tral and lateral faces reddish brown; V complete- ly reddish brown. Telson vesicle orange red. Ped- ipalps: femur yellow brown, patella more orange brown. Chela darker orange brown to reddish brown. Legs yellow brown with dusky markings. Prosoma: Anterior margin of carapace ob- tusely emarginate. Interocular area finely gran- ular; remainder of carapace with moderately dense, coarse granulation. Mesosoma: Median carina on tergite I obso- lete, on II-VI faint, smooth; tergite VII with me- dian carina weak, granular; lateral pairs strong, crenulate. Pectinal teeth numbering 20-21 in males, 19-21 in females. Stemites III-VI smooth, sparsely setose; VII with pair of faint to obsolete lateral keels. Metasoma: Segments I-IV: Dorsolateral cari- nae strong, crenulate to serrate; distalmost den- SISSOM- SYSTEM ATICS OF THE VAEJOVIS NITIDULUS GROUP 17 tides enlarged, spinoid. Lateral supramedian ca- rinae on I-II strong, crenulate; on III strong, finely crenulate; on IV weak, smooth to finely granular; distalmost denticles on I-III enlarged, spinoid and on IV flared. Lateral inframedian carinae on I complete, strong, crenulate; on II-III present on posterior one-third, granular; on IV absent. Ventrolateral carinae obsolete or weak, smooth. Ventral submedian carinae obsolete. Intercarinal spaces essentially smooth, ventral faces with nu- merous setae. Segment V (Fig. 41): Dorsolateral carinae weak, finely granular; lateromedian ca- rinae obsolete; ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae weak, finely crenulate. Intercarinal spac- es smooth. Telson: (Fig. 41). Ventral surface of vesicle with fine granulation, about 1 5 pairs of large setae. Pedipalp: Trichobothrial pattern (Figs. 42-49) Type C, orthobothriotaxic (Vachon 1974). Fe- mur (Fig. 42): carinae strong, granulose; internal face with about 8 larger granules and several smaller ones; dorsal face with scattered fine gran- ulation. Patella (Figs. 43-45) with dorsointemal and ventrointemal carinae strong, crenulate; dorsoextemal carina weak, smooth; ventroex- temal carina weak, granular; internal face with moderate basal tubercle and oblique longitudinal carinae of 7-8 large granules. Dorsal face smooth or finely granular; external face finely granular (smooth). Chela (Figs. 46-50). Dorsointemal ca- rinae weak, granular; all other keels obsolete or very faint. Dentate margin of fixed finger with primary row of denticles divided into seven sub- rows by six enlarged granules; six inner accessory granules (Fig. 49). Dentate margin of movable finger divided into seven subrows by six larger denticles; apical subrow with only one or two granules; seven inner accessory granules (Fig. 50). Scalloping subtle in male chela fingers. Hemispermatophore: (Figs. 83, 84). Distal laminar length/width = 6.25; lamina with dis- tinct tapering toward distal end; inner lobe rel- atively broad; basal lobe small, rounded; median lobe larger, rounded. Variation.— Only two adult males and seven adult females were available for study. Variation in pectinal tooth counts in these specimens is as follows: in the males, one comb with 20 teeth and three with 2 1 ; in females, two combs with 19 teeth, six with 20, and six with 21. Variation in morphometries is summarized in the diag- nosis. Comparisons.— Faejovw pococki, in bearing seven subrows on the chela fixed finger, is most similar to V. nitidulus and V. mitchelU. For com- parisons with V. mitchelti, consult the “Com- parisons” section for that species. Vaejovis po- cocki may be easily distinguished from V. nitidulus by its dark reddish brown coloration, its lower pectinal tooth counts, the possession of only two esb trichobothria on the pedipalp pa- tella, and extremely reduced carination of me- tasoma V. This species was apparently mistaken for V. nigrescens and V. nitidulus by earlier authors (Hoffmann 1931; Diaz Najera 1964, 1975). The type specimens of V. pococki are apparently the same ones examined by Diaz Najera (1964, 1975) and referred by that author to V. nitidulus. Vae,- Jovis pococki occurs on the eastern side of the Sierra Madre Occidental and apparently is al- lopatric with V. nigrescens (which occurs on the western side of that mountain range). Although V. pococki is quite similar to V. nigrescens in coloration, it may be easily distinguished from that species by the possession of seven subrows of denticles on the pedipalp chela fingers. Specimens examined.— MEXICO: Queretaro: Que- retaro, 5-23 August 1963 (no collector data), 1 holotype female, 3 paratype females (RS-4288)(MNHN), 8 km NW Queretaro on border Guanajuato/Queretaro states, January 1982 (S. A. Minton), 1 paratype male (MEB), Queretaro (in house), Fall 1978 (S. A. Minton), 1 para- type female (SAM), Queretaro (in house), early July 1988 (Mrs. M. Cervantes), 1 paratype male, 1 paratype female (WDS). San Luis Potosv. 32 km S San Luis Potosi (on vertical face of large boulder, UV light), 24 August 1984 (C. Myers, W. D. Sissom, L. Bom), 1 paratype female (WDS), Villa Hidalgo, 12 March 1977 (R. W. Mitchell), 1 juv. (AMNH-OFF), Alvarez, June- September 1976 (W. W. Brown), 1 paratype female (MCZ). Vaejovis mbrimanus, new species Figs. 51-60 Type data.— Holotype male from Gruta Sur de San Bartolo, approximately 3 mi. S Santa Ca- tarina, Nuevo Leon, Mexico, 3 December 1 966 (T. Raines). Deposited in the American Museum of Natural History, New York. Etymology.— The specific epithet is derived from the Latin words "'ruber", meaning red, and "manus", meaning hand, which describes the coloration of the pedipalps in this species. Distribution.— Known only from the type lo- cality. Diagnosis.— Adults 45-60 mm in length. Base color of body yellow brown; pedipalp femur and 18 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 51-60.— Morphology of Vaejovis rubrimanus, new species, from Nuevo Leon, Mexico: 51, lateral aspect of metasomal segments IV and V, and telson; 52, dorsal aspect of pedipalp femur; 53, dorsal aspect of pedipalp patella; 54, external aspect of pedipalp patella; 55, ventral aspect of pedipalp patella; 56, dorsal aspect of pedipalp chela; 57, external aspect of pedipalp chela; 58, ventral aspect of pedipalp chela; 59, dentition pattern on fixed finger of pedipalp chela; 60, dentition pattern on movable finger of pedipalp chela. patella light yellow, chela orange red. Pectinal tooth count 27-28 in males, 24-26 in females. Metasomal segment III length/width 1 .48 in male, 1.23-1.24 in females; segment V length/width 2.74 in male, 2.60-2.61 in females. Metasoma with ventral submedian carinae on I-IV present, granular to finely crenulate; ventrolateral carinae on I-IV moderate, finely crenulate; segment I longer than wide in male, wider than long in female; other segments distinctly longer than wide in both sexes. Pedipalp patella with 3 esb tricho- bothria; fixed finger with primary row of denti- cles divided into six subrows; movable finger with six subrows and seven inner accessory gran- ules; dorsal and external keels of chela palm smooth or finely granular. Scalloping of male chela fingers moderate. Ratio of chela length/ width 3.76 in male, 4.62-4.67 in females; fixed SISSOM- SYSTEM ATICS OF THE VAEJOVIS NITIDULUS GROUP 19 finger length/carapace length 0.96-0.97; femur length/width 0.97-1.04. Description.— Based on adults; parenthetical statements refer to females. Measurements are given in Table 2. Coloration: Carapace and tergites yellow brown without underlying dusky markings. Metasomal segments I-IV yellow brown, IV slightly darker on distal portion; V orange brown. Telson light orange brown, aculeus dark reddish brown. Ped- ipalp femur and patella uniformly yellow. Chela palm yellowish proximally; inner surface yellow orange; outer surface orange red. Fingers orange brown basally, yellowish distally. Keels of ped- ipalps and metasoma dark yellow brown. Legs pale yellow. Prosoma: Anterior margin of carapace ob- tusely emarginate. Median ocular prominence moderately raised above carapacial surface. In- terocular area essentially smooth; remainder of carapace with dense, fine granulation inter- spersed with larger granules. Mesosoma: Median carina on tergites I-III weak, granular; on IV- VI moderate, granular; tergite VII with median carina moderate, gran- ular and lateral pairs strong, granulose. Pectinal teeth numbering 27-28 in males, 24-26 in fe- males. Stemites III-VI smooth, sparsely setose; VII with pair of strong, crenulate lateral carinae. Metasoma: Segments I-IV: Dorsolateral cari- nae strong, crenulate; distalmost denticles slight- ly enlarged on I-III, not enlarged on IV (Fig. 51). Lateral supramedian carinae strong on I-IV, crenulate on I-III, finely crenulate on IV; distal- most denticles on I-III roughly equal in size to preceding ones, on IV flared. Lateral inframedian carinae on I strong, complete, irregularly cren- ulate; on II present on posterior one-fourth, strong, crenulate; on III present on posterior one- fifth, strong, crenulate; on IV absent. Ventrolat- eral carinae on I-IV strong, finely crenulate. Ven- tral submedian carinae on I weak, finely granu- lar; on II-IV moderate, finely granular to finely crenulate. Dorsal and lateral intercarinal spaces with few scattered coarse granules. Segment V (Fig. 51): Dorsolateral carinae moderate, gran- ular to crenulate. Lateromedian carinae mod- erate, present on anterior three-fourths, irregu- larly crenulate. Ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae strong, crenulate. Dorsal and lateral sur- faces with few scattered coarse granules. Telson: (Fig. 51). Ventral surface with very fine, irregular punctations and granulation, 10 pairs large setae. Pedipalp: Trichobothrial pattern (Figs. 52-59) Type C, neobothriotaxic; patella with 3 esb tri- chobothria (Fig. 54). Femur (Fig. 52): carinae strong, granulose; internal face with 7-8 larger, pointed granules; dorsal face with sparse fine granulation. Patella (Figs. 53-55): dorsointemal, ventrointemai, dorsoextemal, and ventroexter- nal carinae strong, granulose. Internal face with moderate basal tubercle and oblique longitudinal carinae of 6-8 large, subconical granules; dorsal face finely granular. Chela (Figs. 56-60). Dorsal marginal carina moderate, granular. Dorsal sec- ondary and digital carinae weak, smooth to finely granular. External secondary carina obsolete to weak, finely granular. Ventroextemal carina moderate, granular. Ventromedian carina ves- tigial, weak around base of movable finger, gran- ular. Ventrointemai carina weak to moderate, granular. Dorsointemal carina strong, composed of enlarged, sharp granules. Dentate margin of fixed finger with primary denticle row divided into six subrows by five enlarged granules; six inner accessory granules (Fig. 59). Dentate mar- gin of movable finger with primary denticle row divided into six subrows by five enlarged gran- ules; apical subrow consisting of a single granule; seven inner accessory granules (Fig. 60). Fingers of male with distinct scalloping. Hemispermatophore: Not dissected due to scarcity of material. Variation.— The holotype male had a pectinal tooth count of 26-27; the two paratype females had counts of 24-24 and 26-26. Variation in morphometries, based on the holotype male and two adult paratype females, is summarized in the diagnosis. Comparisons.— Fhe/'ovri rubrimanus is most similar to V. minckleyi Williams. From this spe- cies it can be easily distinguished by the following characters: (1) the outer keels of the pedipalp chela palm are smooth to finely granular (not granulose); (2) the entire outer chela surface is reddish orange (not with the palm yellow and fingers reddish brown); (3) the inferior margin of the cheliceral fixed finger is smooth (not with several denticles); (4) chela length/width ratio in males is approximately 3.8 (not exceeding 4.6) and in females 4. 6-4. 7 (not exceeding 6.0); and (5) the metasoma is not as slender. Comments.— The holotype male was taken from a cave in Huasteca Canyon, near Monter- rey, Nuevo Leon, but its occurrence in that hab- itat is certainly accidental (Mr. J. R. Reddell, pers. comm.). The two females were taken from 20 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY steep slopes in the canyon with UV light. This canyon is characterized by impressive vertical walls reaching approximately 300 m in height, at the base of which are talus slopes ranging to about 60 degrees. Both specimens were taken about 50-100 m from the base of such a slope. Three other species were collected on the same slope as the paratypes: Centruroides vittatus (Say), Diplocentrus colwelH Sissom, and Vaejovis cras- simanus Pocock. Of the species collected, the diplocentrid was the most abundant and V. rub- rimanus the least abundant. Vaejovis rubrimanus was not found on the lower slopes, where most of the other scorpions were taken. Specimens examined.— MEXICO: Nuevo Leon: Gruta Sur de San Bartolo, 3 December 1 966 (T. Raines), I male holotype (AMNH), Canon de Huasteca, 3 mi. S Santa Catarina, 22 May 1984 (W. D. Sissom, C. S. Colwell), 2 female paratopotypes (WDS). Vaejovis solegladi, new species Figs. 61-70, 77, 78 Vejovis nitidulus nitidulus, Hoffmann 1931:371-372 (misidentification); 1939:318 (misidentification). Vaejovis nitidulus nitidulus, Diaz Najera 1 975:29 (mis- identification repeated). Type data.— Holotype male from Cuicatlan, Oaxaca, Mexico (no date or collector), C. C. Hoffmann Collection. Deposited in the Ameri- can Museum of Natural History, New York. Etymology.— The specific epithet is a patro- nym honoring Michael E. Soleglad for his con- tributions to vaejovid systematics. Distribution.— Known from the Tehuacan area in Puebla and from northern and central Oaxaca, Mexico. Diagnosis. — Adults 38-55 mm in length. Base color yellow, without dusky markings on cara- pace and tergites. Stemite VII with lateral carinae moderate, granular. Pectinal tooth count 18-22 in males, 1 8-20 in females. Metasomal segment III length/width 0.95-1.00; segment V length/ width 1.90-2.02. Metasoma with inframedian carinae present on distal two-thirds of segment II and distal one-half of segment III; ventral sub- median carinae on I-IV obsolete; ventrolateral carinae on I-IV moderate, granular; ventral sur- faces of metasoma and telson very hirsute. Ped- ipalp patella with 2 esb trichobothria; chela ma- nus with outer carinae greatly reduced, smooth to finely granular or obsolete; fixed finger dentate margin with six subrows of denticles; movable finger with six subrows and seven inner accessory granules. Chela very slender with elongate fin- gers; chela fingers of male without scalloping. Chela length/width ratio 4. 8-5. 3; chela length/ palm length ratio 2.75-3.0; fixed finger length/ carapace length 0.84-0.93; femur length/cara- pace length 0.93-0.96. Description.— Based on adults; measurements of the holotype male and a paratype female are given in Table 2. Coloration: Carapace, tergites, and venter yel- low to yellow brown, lacking underlying dusky markings. Metasomal segments I-III yellowish; IV yellowish above, orange brown with dusky markings below; V yellow proximally, orange brown to brown distally with dusky markings. Telson vesicle orange brown with dusky mark- ings on ventral surface. Pedipalps: femur and patella yellowish, chela manus yellow to yellow orange with fingers somewhat darker; carination dark orange brown. Legs pale yellow. Prosoma: Anterior margin of carapace ob- tusely emarginate, median notch weak. Inter- ocular area smooth or finely granular; remainder of carapace densely, coarsely granular. Mesosoma: Median carina on I-II obsolete, on III-IV weak, granular; on V-VI moderate, gran- ular. Tergite VII with median carina moderate, granular; lateral pairs strong, granulose. Pectinal tooth count 18-22 in males; 18-20 in females. Stemites III-VI smooth, moderately setose; VII with one pair moderate, granular lateral carinae. Metasoma: Dorsolateral carinae strong, cren- ulate to serrate; distalmost denticles on I-III slightly enlarged, spinoid; on IV not noticeably enlarged. Lateral supramedian carinae on I-III strong, crenulate; on IV moderate, irregularly granular; distalmost denticle on I-III enlarged, spinoid and on IV flared. Lateral inframedian carinae on I complete, strong, crenulate; on II present on posterior two-thirds, moderate, cren- ulate; on III present on posterior one-half, weak, crenulate; on IV absent. Ventrolateral carinae moderate, granular. Ventral submedian carinae obsolete. Intercarinal spaces with scattered coarse granulation; setae of ventral surface moderately dense, not paired along ventral submedian ca- rinae. Segment V (Fig. 61): Dorsolateral carinae weak, granular on anterior one-half, smooth pos- teriorly; lateromedian carinae essentially obso- lete; ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae weak, finely crenulate. Dorsal and lateral inter- carinal spaces with scattered coarse granulation; ventral surface smooth, moderately setose. Telson: (Fig. 61). Ventral surface with irregular Figures 61-70.— Morphology of Vaejovis solegladi, new species, from Oaxaca, Mexico: 61, lateral aspect of metasomal segments IV and V, and telson; 62, dorsal aspect of pedipalp femur; 63, dorsal aspect of pedipalp patella; 64, external aspect of pedipalp patella; 65, ventral aspect of pedipalp patella; 66, dorsal aspect of pedipalp chela; 67, external aspect of pedipalp chela; 68, ventral aspect of pedipalp chela; 69, dentition pattern on fixed finger of pedipalp chela; 70, dentition pattern on movable finger of pedipalp chela. punctations interspersed with fine granules; ves- icle of female moderately globose; ventral aspect conspicuously hirsute, with 50 or more setae. Pedipalp: Trichobothrial pattern (Figs. 62-69) Type C, orthobothriotaxic (Vachon 1974). Fe- mur (Fig. 62): carinae strong, granulose; internal face with 7-9 larger granules and several smaller ones; dorsal face essentially smooth. Patella (Figs. 63-65): dorsointemal and ventrointemal carinae strong, granulose; dorsoextemal carina weak to moderate, finely granular; ventroexteraal carina moderate, granulose. Internal face with moder- ate basal tubercle and oblique longitudinal carina of 9-1 1 large, irregularly spaced granules; dorsal 22 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY face more or less smooth. Chela (Figs. 66-70). Dorsal marginal carina weak, granular. Dorsal secondary and digital carinae weak, smooth. Ex- ternal secondary carina obsolete. Ventroextemal carina obsolete to weak, smooth. Ventromedian carina obsolete. Ventrointemal carina weak, granular. Dorsointemal carina moderate, com- posed of enlarged, sharp granules. Dentate mar- gin of fixed finger with primary denticle row di- vided into six subrows by five enlarged granules; six inner accessory granules (Fig. 69). Dentate margin of movable finger with primary denticle row divided into six subrows by five enlarged granules; seven inner accessory granules (Fig. 70). Fingers long and tenuous, ratio of movable finger length/palm length 1. 8-2.1; fingers of male with- out scalloping. Hemispermatophore: (Figs. 77-78). Distal lamina of average proportions (distal laminar length/width = 6.09, N = \), not distinctly ta- pered. Median lobe relatively large, rounded. Variation.— Variation in pectinal tooth counts is summarized as follows: in males, two combs with 1 8 teeth, two with 20, one with 2 1 , and one with 22; in females, two combs with 18 teeth, two combs with 19, and two combs with 20. Morphometric variation, based on the three adult males and three adult females, is summarized in the diagnosis. Sexual differences, except in body size, are not conspicuous. Keel structure and granulation, which typically exhibit considerable sexual vari- ation in this species group, are not noticeably different in males and females of V. solegladi. Morphometries are also quite similar, although sample sizes do not permit statistical analysis. Juveniles differ considerably from the adults in coloration. Instead of yellow, their base colora- tion is brownish with distinct underlying dusky markings on all cuticular surfaces. Comparisons. — Vaejovis solegladi is most sim- ilar to V. intermedins and V. nigrescens. It can be readily distinguished from V. intermedins by the following characters: (1) males of V. solegladi have pectinal tooth counts of 18-22 (not 21-26), females 18-20 (not 19-24); (2) males lack scal- loping on the pedipalp chela fingers; (3) the lat- eral inframedian carinae on metasomal segments II and III are more complete than in V. inter- medins, extending two-thirds to one-half the length of their respective segments; (4) the dis- talmost denticles of the dorsolateral carinae of the metasoma are not distinctly enlarged, as in V. intermedins’, (5) the pedipalp chela fingers are proportionately longer; and (6) the chela palm is more slender. The hemispermatophore of V. so- legladi has a proportionately stouter distal lam- ina and a different configuration of dorsoectal lobes than found in V. intermedins (cf Figs. 73 and 77). Characters 2, 3, 4 and (with few exceptions) 6 also serve to distinguish V. solegladi from V. nigrescens. In addition, the body color of V. so- legladi is yellow, whereas that of V. nigrescens is dark reddish brown, and the ventral surfaces of the metasoma and telson are much more hirsute than in V. nigrescens. The configuration of dor- soectal hemispermatophoric lobes also serves to distinguish the two species (cf. Figs. 75 and 77). This species was previously mistaken for V. nit idulns {Hoffmann 1931). Vaejovis solegladi is readily distinguished from V. nitidulns by having only six subrows of denticles (not seven) on the pedipalp chela fixed finger; two patellar esb tri- chobothria (not three); and 18-22 pectinal teeth (not 24-28 in males and 21-27 in females). Specimens examined.— MEXICO: Oaxaca’. Cuica- tlan (no date or collector), 1 holotype male, 1 paratype male, 1 paratype female (C. C. Hoffmann collection; now AMNH), Cuicatlan (in house), 1931 (no collector), 1 juv. (AMNH), 5.8 mi. N Teotitl^, 31 July 1973 (L. R. Erickson, M. E. Soleglad), 2 paratype females (MES, cat. no. MX- 131), 30 mi. N Telixtlahuaca, 14 August 1 967 (J. Reddefi, J. Fish, T. Evans), 1 juv. male (AMNH). Puebla; 6 km N Tehuac^, 22 August 1987 (J. Doyen), 1 male (UCB). Vaejovis nitidulns C. L. Koch Previous confusion surrounding the identity of V. nitidnlus was discussed earlier (Sissom and Francke 1 985), but new informaton is now avail- able regarding some previous records. Hoff- mann’s (1931) records of V. nitidulns in Oaxaca were based on misidentifications; the taxon found there represents a new species, V. solegladi, de- scribed above. The two specimens from Etla, Oaxaca listed by Bucherl (1959) as V. nitidulns are juveniles of a species of Diplocentrns (Diplo- centridae). Vaejovis nitidnlus seems to be re- stricted to the Sierra Madre Oriental in Hidalgo and northeastern Queretaro. Diaz Najera’s (1964, 1975) records for V. nitidulns in Guanajuato and Queretaro (city), along the eastern side of the Sierra Madre Occidental, are almost certainly misidentifications. Two other species occur in that area: V. nigrescens and V. pococki. The hemispermatophore of V. nitidulns (Figs. 81-82) is characterized by having a relatively SISSOM- SYSTEM ATICS OF THE VAEJOVIS NITIDULUS GROUP 23 Figures 71-78.— Right hemispermatophores of species of the Vaejovis nitidulus 71, 72, V. curvidigitus\ 71, dorsal aspect; 72, ventral aspect; 73, 74, V. intermedius\ 73, dorsal aspect; 74, ventral aspect; 75, 76, V. nigrescens; 75, dorsal aspect; 76, ventral aspect; 77, 78, V. solegtadi; 77, dorsal aspect; 78 ventral aspect (composite drawing based on both left and right hemispermatophores). bl = basal lobe; BP = basal portion; c = sperm canal; DL = distal lamina; dt = dorsal trough; ep = ental process of inner lobe; ebp = ectobasal process of inner lobe; H = hooks; il = inner lobe; ml = median lobe; mtc = median transverse cleavage; ol = outer lobe; tm = dorsal trough margin. broad (distal lamina length/width 5.56-5.60, N = 2), straight, and untapered lamina; the inner lobe of the capsule is long and narrow; the basal and median lobes are rounded. New records.— MEXICO: Hidalgo-. Ixmiquilpan, July 1963 (collector unknown), 1 male, 1 female, 1 juv. (MNHN, RS-4072), Jacala, 8-VIII-? (R. Haag), 1 fe- male (MCZ), Zimapan, July 1963 (collector unknown), 1 male, 1 female (MNHN, RS-4091). 24 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Vaejovis nigrescens Pocock The specimens referable to V. nigrescens that I have been able to obtain are from the central Mexican states of Aguascalientes, Distrito Fed- eral, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Michoacan, and Za- catecas. Hoffmann (1931, 1937) and Diaz Najera (1964, 1975) cited records for V. nigrescens from Hidalgo, Queretaro, and adjacent parts of San Luis Potosi. These records are almost certainly based on misidentifications. In western Quere- taro and southern San Luis Potosi is a new spe- cies (described above) that superficially resem- bles V. nigrescens and was confused with it in the past. In the southern portion of the Sierra Madre Oriental in the state of Hidalgo, only two nitidulus group species have been identified: V. nitidulus and V. kochi. The latter superficially resembles V. nigrescens in coloration, but differs from it in morphometries, carination, and tri- chobothrial pattern. The hemispermatophore of V. nigrescens (Figs. 75-76) is relatively broad (distal lamina length/ width = 5.70, A = 1), slightly curved, and un- tapered; the inner lobe of the capsule is long and relatively broad; the basal and median lobes are sharply rimmed. New records.— MEXICO: Jalisco: Arandas (no date or collector), one male (MNHN, RS-4290), 2 juvs. (MNHN, RS-4286), Tepatitlan (no date or collector), 1 male, 1 female (MNHN, RS-4289). Michoacan: El Sabino, April 1928 (H. Faber), 1 male, 1 female (ZMK), UraapM, 15 July 1941 (Leavenworth) (on side of house), 1 female (AMNH). Zacatecas: Valparaiso, 16 July 1963 (L. Mazzotti), 1 male (RS-4021)(MNHN). Vaejovis intermedins Borelli Vaejovis intermedins is known from south- western Texas (Brewster, Crockett, Presidio, Terrell, and Val Verde Counties) and the states of Chihuahua, Coahuila, Durango, and Nuevo Leon in Mexico. Attempts to confirm some ear- lier records of Hoffmann (193 1) and Diaz Najera ( 1 964, 1975) have met with partial success. Hoff- mann’s specimens from the Sierra de Guadelupe, Distrito Federal could not be located, although they are presumably deposited in the Institute de Biologia, Mexico City. This record was cer- tainly based on a misidentification, and the spec- imens may be referable to V. nigrescens. I have examined a specimen determined by Diaz Na- jera as “ Vaejovis nitidulus intermedins" from San Juan de los Lagos, Jalisco (MNHN, RS-4291)(see Diaz Najera 1964: 25, 1975:26). This specimen is not referable to V. intermedins, but rather to V. cristimanus Pocock {intrepidus group). The specimens from Ixmiquilpan, Hidalgo (Diaz Na- jera 1964: 24, 1975: 25) were not located; how- ever, I have seen only specimens of V. nitidulus from that locality, and this record is almost cer- tainly based on that species. The hemispermatophore of V. intermedins (Figs. 73-74) bears a long, slender distal lamina (lamina length/width = 7.05-7.39, V = 3) and trunk. The lamina is essentially straight and no- ticeably tapered. The inner lobe of the capsule is broader at its base; the basal and median lobes are sharply rimmed. New records. — MEXICO: Chihuahua: Clarines Mine, 5 mi. NW Santa Barbara (2072 m), 8 February 1947 (G. M. Bradt), 1 juv. female (AMNH). Coahuila: 15 mi. E Cuatro Cienegas de Carranza, 22 July 1972 (E. A. Liner, R. M. Johnson, A. H. Chaney), 1 female (FSCA). Nuevo Leon: Bustamente Canyon, Busta- mente, 26 November 1986 (A. G. Grubbs), 2 females (TMM), in the mountains 2 mi. NE Villa de Garcia, 19 August 1984 (W. D. Sissom, C. Myers, L. Bom), 6 males, 2 females (WDS); 9 mi. NNW, 2 mi. N Mina, 15 July 1975 (E. A. Liner, et al.), 1 female, 1 subadult female (FSCA). U.S.A.: Texas: Brewster Co., Alpine, 22 April 1964 (J. F. Scudday), 1 female (CAS), off Texas Farm Road 1 70, 9 mi. W Junction of State High- way 118 (5 mi. W Terlingua), 19 May 1989 (R. N. Henson), 1 female (RNH), Nugent Peak, Big Bend Na- tional Park, June 1986 (S. Stockwell), 1 juv. (WDS); road to Pine Canyon, 24 May 1987 (R. Henson), 1 female (1450 m), 1 juv. (1115 m)(RNH); Jeff Davis Co., Davis Mountains, 27 June 1990 (W. Vandeven- der), 1 female (RNH); Presidio Co., 2 mi. W Lajitas, 30 May 1970 (W. Seifert); Val Verde Co., NW side of Amistad Reservoir (on road cut), 3 mi. E Del Rio, 24 May 1983 (W. D. Sissom, C. S. Colwell, N. McRey- nolds), 1 female (CAS). Vaejovis decipiens Hoffmann Two early instar juvenile specimens, whose locality data are presented below, are tentatively referred to this species. They bear the appropri- ate pedipalp chela dentition, patella external tri- chobothrial pattern, pectinal tooth counts, and metasomal carinal morphology; furthermore, in coloration they are very similar to juveniles of V. decipiens examined previously (Sissom and Francke 1985). New records.— MEXICO: Sonora: Sierra de Ala- mos, 15-30 Jan 1968 (V. Roth), ljuv. female (AMNH), Rancho Los Banos (30°30’N:1 10“40’W), 9 May 1966 (V. Roth), 1 juv. female (AMNH). SISSOM=-SYSTEMATICS OF THE VAEJOVIS NITIDULUS GROUP 25 Figures 79-84.— Right hemispermatophores of species of the Vaejovis nitidulus group: 79, 80, V. mitchelli; 79, dorsal aspect; 80, ventral aspect; 81, 82, V. nitidulus; 81, dorsal aspect; 82, ventral aspect; 83, 84, V. pococki; 83, dorsal aspect; 84, ventral aspect. To identify structures refer to labels of preceding plate. Vaejovis peninsularis Williams Williams (1980) placed V. peninsularis in the wupatkiensis group of Vaejovis, but it was sub- sequently referred to the Vaejovis nitidulus group (Sissom and Francke 1985). Williams and Berke (1986), who resurrected the genus Serradigitus Stahnke for certain species of the V. wupatkiensis group, chose to retain V. peninusularis in Vae- jovis, thus agreeing with Sissom and Francke (1985). In particular, the possession of six sub- rows of denticles on the chela fingers, the basal position of triohobothria ib and it, and the pos- session of three esb trichobothria on the pedi- palpal patella are indicators of affinities with the nitidulus group. A specimen in the American Museum of Nat- ural History labeled as a juvenile paratype by 26 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Williams is not V. peninsularis, but is referable to Serradigitus gigantaensis (Williams). Seven other juveniles of V. peninsularis collected by Vince Roth at Mission San Ignacio on the same date as the paratypes were also located in the AMNH. New records.— MEXICO: Baja California Sur: in rockslide ca. 1.5 mi. from Pie de la Cueta Ranch on trail to Guajademi (S of El Portrero), 23 Oct 1972 (D. B. Richman, R. Reeder, P. D. Eliscu), 1 male, 1 female (FSCA), under rock near Pie de la Cueta (between El Portrero and Guajademi), 22 Oct 1972 (D. B. Rich- man, et al.). THE UTILIZATION OF HEMISPERMATO- PHORE MORPHOLOGY IN VAEJOVID SYSTEMATICS The vaejovid spermatophore (and, conse- quently, hemispermatophore), like that found in most scorpion families, is lamelliform (Francke 1979; Lamoral 1979). Lamelliform hemisper- matophores are characterized by the possession of a basal trunk area and a distal blade-like struc- ture referred to as the distal lamina (e.g., see Fig. 71). Near the junction of the trunk and distal lamina on the ventral and ental (or medial) sur- faces may be a system of lobes and processes often referred to as the capsule (Francke 1979), although there is considerable variation in the complexity of this region. The terminology for these lobes was reviewed by Lamoral (1979), and I have attempted to apply his nomenclature to vaejovid hemispermatophores. Vaejovid hem- ispermatophores differ considerably from those of scorpionids in the structure of the capsular region, so the present interpretation of homol- ogies should be considered tentative until com- parative phylogenetic studies, which are in prog- ress, can be completed. Illustrations of hemispermatophores of seven species of the Vae- jovis nitidulus group are presented together here (Figs. 71-84) to facilitate comparisons. There is considerable variation among vae- jovids in the morphology of the hemisperma- tophore, and this variation should prove ex- tremely useful to systematics at the generic, species group, and specific levels. The morphol- ogy of the distal lamina differs considerably among the different vaejovid groups. The rela- tive length and slenderness of the blade, as well as the degree of tapering towards the distal end, differs among vaejovid species. For this study, I have indicated relative slenderness of the blade as the ratio between distal laminar length (mea- sured from the base of the dorsal trough to the tip of the lamina) and laminar width at mid- length. Although based on the small sample sizes available here, this ratio appears to be relatively constant. In vaejovids, the ental (= medial) margin of the dorsal trough is usually produced distally into some type of sclerotized structure. The different types of structures present here may prove to have considerable taxonomic value above the species level. In all species of the Vaejovis niti- dulus group thus far examined, this structure takes the form of a pair of hooks (e.g.. Fig. 71) that is always located basally on the dorsoental sur- face of the distal lamina. I have observed com- parable double hooks on hemispermatophores of at least some representatives of other groups, such as the Vaejovis mexicanus group (Sissom 1989a), a few Uroctonus {sensu Soleglad 1973), Vejovoidus, and Paruroctonus. Some mexicanus group species, such as V. mexicanus Koch, V. granulatus Pocock, and V. maculosus Sissom lack hooks altogether (Sissom 1989a). The hemisper- matophores of other vaejovid groups examined (i.e., Syntropis, Serradigitus, and the Vaejovis eusthenura, punctipalpi, and intrepidus groups) bear a broad flange along the ental margin of the distal lamina which may be bluntly bifurcate dis- tally, possibly representing a condition derived from that seen in the aforementioned groups. This flange typically terminates some distance from the base of the lamina. The capsular region is highly variable among vaejovids, ranging from a very simple structure to a highly developed system of lobes and pro- cesses. The basal portion of the capsule is oc- cupied by a folded canal that may function in sperm transport. The inner lobe, when present, is usually a fingerlike lobe projecting distally to- wards the distal laminar base (very similar to the condition found in scorpionids). It bears an ental process (e.g., see Fig. 72) that may possess a series of booklets and a curved, flange-like ectobasal process. The ental process bears booklets in Syn- tropis and the eusthenura, punctipalpi, and in- trepidus groups of Vaejovis, but does not in spe- cies of other groups, including the nitidulus group. In the former case, the number of booklets ap- pears to vary according to species and has re- cently been used to separate species (Sissom, 1989b); these booklets were referred to as “cap- sular spines” in that paper, but the former term seems more appropriate. In the nitidulus group species, the number and shape of lobes com- SISSOM- SYSTEM ATICS OF THE VAEJOVIS NITIDULUS GROUP 27 prising the dorsoental portion of the capsule is variable. For example, the median and basal lobes may be produced into a distinct rim, appearing pointed in the dorsal and ventral views (Figs. 73- 76), or they may be gently rounded (Figs. 79- 84). Two closely related species (perhaps sister species), V. nigrescens and V. intermedins, pos- sess median and basal lobes that are sharply rimmed; however, the lobes are not so rimmed in closely related species, V. curvidigitus and V. solegladi. It is also interesting to note that round- ed lobes occur in V. mitchelli, V. nitidulus, and V. pococki] these three species are apparently close relatives as well, based on their external anatomy (see comparisons sections for these species). Fi- nally, in addition to the median, basal, and outer lobes, accessory lobes may be present on the dor- soental aspect (e.g., V. curvidigitus, V. nigrescens, V. nitidulus, and V. pococki). Without doubt, as our understanding of hem- ispermatophoric structure in vaejovids and the related chactoid groups increases, many new characteristics beyond the few mentioned here will prove to be of taxonomic and phylogenetic value. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Numerous curators and institutions provided assistance during the course of this study, either through loans of specimens or by searching through their collections for pertinent material. For the loan of material, including type speci- mens, I wish to thank E.-G. Burmeister, Zool- ogische Staatssammlung, Munich (ZSM); G. B. Edwards, the Florida State Collection of Arthro- pods (FSCA), Gainesville; O. Elter, Museo ed Istituto di Zoologia Sistematica della Universita di Torino (TOR), Torino, Italy; H. W. Levi, the Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ), Har- vard University, Cambridge, Mass.; W. R. Lour- engo and M. Vachon, the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), Paris; M. Moritz, Zoologisches Museum der Humboldt-Univer- sitat (ZMB), Berlin; N. I. Platnick, the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH), New York; W. J. Pulawski and V. F. Lee, the California Academy of Sciences (CAS), San Francisco; J. Reddell, the Texas Memorial Museum (TMM), the University of Texas, Austin; S. A. Stockwell, University of California at Berkeley (UCB); F. R. Wanless and P. D. Hillyard, the British Mu- seum (Natural History) (BMNH), London; and L. Watrous, J. B. Kethley, and D. A. Summers, the Field Museum of Natural History (FMNH), Chicago. The following individuals kindly loaned me specimens from their personal collections: M. E. Braunwalder (MEB), O. F. Francke (OFF- AMNH), R. N. Henson (RNH), S. A. Minton (SAM), J. A. Nilsson (JAN), and M. E. Soleglad (MES). I am extremely grateful for their assis- tance. O. F. Francke also allowed me access to specimens he had on loan from the Zoologisk Museum, Copenhagen (ZMK). For permission to collect in Big Bend National Park, I am grateful to M. Fleming and the Na- tional Park Service, Department of the Interior. J. Reddell provided some information on the cave record of V. rubrimanus and other localities in Mexico. I also wish to extend a heartfelt thanks to C. S. Colwell and C. and L. (nee Bom) Myers, who accompanied me in the field. L. P. Alberstadt, V. Fet, O. Francke, R. Krai, D. E. McCauley, M. F. Miller, T. L. Page, G. A. Polls, and S. A. Stockwell read various drafts of the manuscript; their comments and suggestions are sincerely appreciated. C. Myers, P. Malone, and S. Hughes provided clerical assistance. This research represents partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree at Van- derbilt University and was partially supported by a grant from the graduate school of that in- stitution. Page charges were paid with the assis- tance of Faculty Research and Development Grants from Elon College. LITERATURE CITED Biicherl, W. 1959. Escorpioes e escorpionism no Bra- sil. X. Catalogo da colegao escorpionica do Institute Butantan. Mem. Inst. Butantan, 29:255-275. Diaz Najera, A. 1964. Alacranes de la Republica Mexicana: Identificacion de ejemplares capturados en 235 localidades. Rev. Inst. Salubr. Enferm. Trop., Mexico, 24:12-30. Diaz Najera, A. 1975. Listas y dates de distribucidn geografica de los alacranes de Mexico (Scorpionida). Rev. Inst. Salubr. Enferm. Trop., Mexico, 35:1-36. Francke, O. F. 1977. Scorpions of the genus Diplo- centrus from Oaxaca, Mexico (Scorpionida, Diplo- centridae). J. ArachnoL, 4:145-200. Francke, O. F. 1979. Spermatophores of some North American scorpions (Arachnida, Scorpiones). J. Ar- achnol., 7:19-32. Hoffmann, C. C. 1931. Los Scorpiones de Mexico. Primera parte: Diplocentridae, Chactidae, Vejovi- dae. An. Inst. Biol., Mexico, 2:291-408. Hoffmann, C. C. 1937. Nota acerca de los alacranes del Valle de Mezquital, Hgo. An. Inst. Biol., Mexico, 8:201-206. Hoffmann, C. C. 1939. Nuevas consideraciones ac- 28 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY erca de los alacranes de Mexico. An. Inst. Biol., Mexico, 9:317-337. Lamoral, B. H. 1979. The scorpions of Namibia (Arachnida: Scorpionida). Ann. Natal Mus., 23(3): 497-784. Sissom, W. D. 1989a. Systematic studies on granulatus Pocock and Vaejovis pmillus Pocock, with descriptions of six new related species (Scorpiones, Vaejovidae). Revue Arachnol., 8(9): 13 1-1 57. Sissom, W. D. 1989b. Redescription of Faeyovw oc- cidentalis Hoffmann with a revised diagnosis for Vaejovis subcristatus Pocock (Scorpiones, Vaejovi- dae). Revue Arachnol., 8(1 1): 179-1 87. Sissom, W. D. & O. F. Francke. 1985. Redescriptions of some poorly known species of the nitidulus group of the genus Vaejovis (Scorpiones, Vaejovidae). J. Arachnol., 13:243-266. Sissom, W. D., G. A. Polis, & D. D. Watt. 1 990. Field and laboratory methods. In The Biology of Scor- pions. (G. A. Polis, ed.). Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. Soleglad, M. E. 1973. Scorpions of the mexicanus group of the genus Vejovis (Scorpionida, Vejovidae). Wasmann J. Biology, 31:351-372. Stahnke, H. L. 1970. Scorpion nomenclature and mensuration. Entomol. News, 81:297-316. Vachon, M. 1974. Etude des caractdres utilises pour classer les families et les genres de Scorpions (Ar- achnides). Bull. Mus. natn. Hist, nat., Paris, 3e Sen, No. 140, Zool. 104:857-958. Williams, S. C. 1980. Scorpions of Baja California, Mexico, and adjacent islands. Occ. Pap. California Acad. Sci., 135:1-127. Williams, S. C. & B. T. Berke. 1986. A new species of Serradigitus from central California (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae). Pan-Pacific Entomol., 62:350-354. Manuscript received January 1989, revised July 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:29-39 A NEW SPECIES OF WOLF SPIDER, SCHIZOCOSA STRIDULANS (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) Gail E. Stratton: Department of Biology, Albion College, Albion, MI 49224 USA Abstract. Schizocosa stridulans new species is a sibling species to S. ocreata and S. rovneri. Both males and females of S. stridulans are very similar to males and females of S. ocreata and S. rovneri in coloration and genitalia, but are significantly smaller in carapace length and width. Mature males of S. stridulans lack a distinctive tuft of bristles on the tibia of the first pair of legs (present in mature males of S. ocreata, absent in mature males of 5'. rovneri)-, however, the tibia, patella and the distal 1/3 to 1/2 of the femur of legs I of males of S. stridulans are darkly pigmented. S. stridulans is found in mesic uplands leaf litter from Tennessee, Kentucky, Illinois, Ohio, Missouri, Mississippi, and Alabama, and sometimes co-occurs with S. ocreata. Male palps and female epigyna are figured for S. stridulans and for S. rovneri for the first time. The genus Schizocosa Chamberlin consists of medium sized to large wolf spiders that are rel- atively strong legged and keen sighted. Members of this genus are characterized by conspicuous and contrasting light and dark bands on the car- apace and abdomen, a distinct embolus and ter- minal apophysis in the palp of the male (Fig. 1), and an excavated transverse piece in the median septum in the epigynum of the female (Fig. 5) (Dondale & Redner 1978). Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz) is a member of this genus common throughout woodlands of the eastern United States. It is frequently called the brush-legged spider because of conspicuous tufts of black bris- tles and black pigmentation present on the tibia, patella and basitarsus of the first pair of legs in mature males (Fig. 11). In their revision of the genus, Dondale and Redner (1978) noted that there were occasional populations in which the tufts of bristles were reduced or absent. A form lacking tufts and black pigment on the first legs of mature males has a distinct courtship and is recognized as a distinct species {Schizocosa rov- neri Uetz and Dondale 1979). S. ocreata and S. rovneri do not interbreed unless the female is anesthetized; thus, their dilfering courtship be- havior serves as an isolating mechanism between the two species (Uetz & Denterlein 1979). Fur- ther studies by Stratton and Uetz (1981, 1983) demonstrated that the two species are interfertile when forced to mate. A new species of Schizocosa is described and figured herein that is sibling to both S. ocreata and S. rovneri. Mature males of this new species lack the bristles on the first pair of legs, but do have conspicuous pigment on the distal 1/3 of the femur and on the tibia. While at first it was thought they may be hybrids between S. ocreata and S. rovneri (Dondale, pers. comm.), a com- parison of the morphology and behavior of ocreata- rovneri hybrids (Stratton & Uetz 1983, 1986), with these clearly demonstrate that these forms are not hybrids but are a distinct species. METHODS The anatomical description of 5. stridulans is based on mature males and mature females. Spi- ders collected as immatures were reared to ma- turity in the laboratory. Anatomical terminology follows that of Dondale and Redner (1978). Scanning electron micrographs were done on a JEOL JSM T200 scanning electron microscope at 10 kv. Samples were prepared by cleaning ul- trasonically for 3 min and then running samples through a dehydrating series of alcohol dilutions. They were air dried and mounted with silver paint on SEM stubs. Internal aspects of females were first cleared for 30 minutes in enzymatic solution (contact lens cleaner: 1 0 mg/ 1 0 mis dis- tilled water), dehydrated in alcohol dilutions, then air dried and mounted. In order to investigate patterns of co-occur- rence and potential for overlap with related spe- cies, collections of Schizocosa were made in mid- west and southern USA forests from March to July 1983-1986. Special emphasis was placed on collecting from floodplain forests along major rivers, and their corresponding uplands. Collec- 30 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY lions from the Mississippi State Museum and the Museum of Comparative Zoology were also examined. In all collections, mixed assemblages of species were noted. Schizocosa stridulans, new species Figs. 1, 5, 6, 13 Type Material.— Male holotype from Illinois, Mason Co., Sand Ridge State Forest, June 1985 (G. Stratton and L. Hartz), deposited at the Mu- seum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ), Harvard University. Etymology.— The species name refers to the primary method of sound production by males during courtship behavior. Diagnosis. — 5. stridulans is significantly smaller than either S. ocreata (as reported by Dondale & Redner 1978) or S. rovneri (as re- ported by Uetz & Dondale 1979; Table 1), al- though the overlap in sizes of these three species makes size an unreliable character (Table 1). Both males and females are indistinguishable anatom- ically from those of S. ocreata and S. rovneri except for the pattern of pigmentation on the first pair of legs of mature males. Both sexes key to S. ocreata in the key provided in Dondale and Redner’s (1978) revision of the genus. Females can be confidently identified only when collected in association with males. In males of S. stri- dulans, the tibia, patella and distal 1/3 to 1/2 of the femur are black (Fig. 1 3). There are fine black hairs on the tibia of male S. stridulans distinct from the tibial tufts of bristles found in the ma- ture male S. ocreata (Fig. 1 1). Mature males of S. rovneri lack both the tufts of bristles and the solid pigmentation on the tibia of legs I (Fig. 1 2), although these legs may be annulated. Males of 5”. stridulans, S. rovneri and 5. ocreata are iden- tical with respect to length and angle of paleal process of palp, median apophysis and with re- spect to rugose prominence along the retrolateral side of the paleal process (Figs. 1-3); this com- pares with the palp of S. crassipes (Fig. 4), a more southern species that has a smooth prominence along the retrolateral side of the paleal process. This last character corresponds with couplet #3, p. 147 in Dondale and Redner’s (1978) key. Mature females of 5. stridulans have a slight darkening of the tibia, patella and basitarsus of legs I, as compared with their other legs. Females of S. stridulans, S. rovneri and S. ocreata all have paired excavations in the transverse piece of the median septum (Figs. 5, 7, 9). In each of these, the distance between the surface excavations is less than the width of one excavation. In females of S. crassipes, the distance between the exca- vations is greater than on the width of one ex- cavation (refer to Dondale «fe Redner’s key to females, couplet 5, p. 149 (1978)). Spermathecae of S. stridulans, S. rovneri and S. ocreata are illustrated in Figs. 6, 8, 10. Males. —Total length, carapace length and car- apace width as reported in Table 1. Carapace brown; pale submarginal band slender, usually distinct and undulating, rarely extending to car- apace margins; pale median band as wide as pos- terior lateral eyes (mean 0.85 mm), with smooth margins and narrowing slightly in posterior third of carapace. Sternum yellow brown. Chelicerae brown, setaceous, with three uneven teeth on promargin of fang furrow and three even teeth on retromargin. Legs II to IV yellow with dark annulations particularly on femur and tibia. Fe- mur of leg I with black pigmentation on distal half to third; tibia and patella of leg I usually uniformly black (rest of leg yellow) (Fig. 1 3). Pig- mentation on femur sometimes streaked. Tibial brush in form of short black hairs that increase the apparent width of the tibia by about 0.2 mm (width of tibia: 0.54; width of tibia -I- hairs: 0.75; 1 5 specimens measured). Dark areas of leg I with the appearance of a “five-o-clock shadow”. Dor- sum of abdomen usually with heart mark (14 of 15 specimens), without chevrons. Cymbium of palp without terminal macrosetae but with con- centration of bristles. Palea of palp with long distal process, and with a furrow marking off rugose prominence on retrolateral side. Median apophysis with distal margin convex and un- dulating. Intromittent part of embolus slender and pointed. Terminal apophysis with thickened margin concealing base of intromittent part of embolus (Fig. 1). Females.— Total length, carapace length and carapace width as reported in Table I. Coloration similar to that of male but with the following Figures 1-4.— Ventral aspect of left palp of Schizocosa species: 1, S. stridulans-, 1, S. rovneri-, 3, S. ocreata-, 4, S. crassipes. ipe = intromittent portion of embolus; ma = median apophysis; ppr = paleal process; rp = rugose prominence; sp = smooth prominence; ta = terminal apophysis. Scale bars = 200 microns. 32 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1.— Comparison of total length, carapace length and carapace width of S. stridulans n.sp., S. ocreata (data from Dondale & Redner 1978), and 5. rovneri (data from Uetz & Dondale 1979). Measurements are in mm. Where sample size is greater than 10 individuals, carapace measurements are given as means ± their standard deviations. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other (1 tailed t test, P < 0.05). S. ocreata S. rovneri S. stridulans MALES Total length (ranges) (mean) 5.65-8.30 6.48-8.00 5.04-6.80 6.40 ± 0.43 Carapace length (means) 3.65 ± 0.43 A 3.73 A 3.25 ± 0.33 B (ranges) 3.48-4.02 2.47-3.80 Carapace width (means) 2.78 ± 0.34 C 2.77 C 2.56 ± 0.24 D (ranges) 2.57-2.95 2.04-3.10 Sample size 20 7 51 FEMALES Total length (ranges) (means) 7.30-10.40 6.01-7.95 6.56-11.36 8.09 ± 1.21 Carapace length (means) 4.00 ± 0.43 E 3.91 E 3.50 ± 0.40 F (ranges) 3.45-4.28 2.63-^.27 Carapace width (means) 3.02 ± 0.31 G 2.93 G 2.68 ± 0.35 H (ranges) 2.64-3.24 1.88-3.21 Sample size 20 7 61 exceptions. Pale median band on prosoma 0.96 mm wide behind eyes and usually narrowed in posterior half of carapace. Chelicerae as in male. Legs I to IV yellow with dark annulations. Tibia, basi tarsus and occasionally patella of leg I darker than on other legs, with annulations less distinct. Epigynum with moderately deep atrium; median septum with longitudinal piece broad posteriorly and usually narrowing anteriorly with lateral edges concave. Transverse piece with large paired excavations, these excavations nearly meeting at midline. In 7 of 1 5 individuals, these excavations asymmetrical in size and sometimes in shape. Distance between excavations varying from al- most no space to a separation slightly less than the width of a single excavation. Spermathecae ovoid, smooth, separated by approximately their width. Courtship behavior.— Males of S. stridulans clearly differ from S. ocreata and S. rovneri in sexual behavior. The courtship of S. stridulans consists of pulses of stridulation of the palp, in- terspersed with tapping of the first pair of legs. A full description of the courtship behavior, the sounds produced during courtship, the variabil- ity of the various components of the behavior, and the results of attempted cross matings is in preparation (Stratton, in prep.). Males of S. stri- dulans will rarely court females of either S. ocreata or S. rovneri. Females of the other spe- cies are not receptive to courting males of S. stridulans. Females of S. stridulans are not re- ceptive to courting males of other species. Geographic distribution and habitat.— Collec- tions of S. stridulans have been made from southern Ohio, Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, Missouri, Alabama and Mississippi (Fig. 14), thus giving it broad geographic overlap with both S. rovneri and S. ocreata. The habitat of S. stri- dulans is mesic uplands leaf litter, typically in oak forests or oak hickory forests (Fig. 1 6). The present study also extends the known range of S. rovneri. In two of eight localities visited in 1984 and 1985, S. stridulans was the only Schizocosa col- lected in the uplands forests (Figs. 15, 16). In three collections, 5. stridulans occurred in the same habitat as S. ocreata (Figs. 15, 16), and in one collection from Alabama it also occurred with a population that is possibly an undescribed species within this species complex (Stratton un- publ. data). Table 2 summarizes 46 collections of Schizocosa and indicates whether species were collected alone, or co-occurred with other species in the species group which includes 5. ocreata, S. rovneri, S. stridulans and the southern species STRATTON-5C///Z<9C05'.4 STRIDULANS, NEW SPECIES 33 Figures 5-10.— External and internal aspects of epigyna of Schizocosa: 5, external aspect of S. stridulans; 7, external aspect S. rovneri\ 9, external aspect S. ocreata; 6, spermatheca of S. stridulans', 8, spermatheca of S. rovneri', 10, spermatheca of S. ocreata. at = atrium; ex = excavation; ms = median septum; tp = transverse piece. Scale bars = 100 microns. 34 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 1 1-13.— Legs I of mature males of Schizocosa: 11,5'. ocreata\ 12, S. rovneri\ 13, S. stridulans. S. crassipes and S . floridana. In most collections each of these species was found alone, although S. ocreata and S. rovneri sometimes co-occurred as did 5. ocreata and S. stridulans. This suggests that for the species that do co-occur, courtship Table 2.— Co-occurrence of species within the Schi- zocosa ocreata species complex. Each entry represents a separate collection. Collections were by the author, by Wayne Maddison and from the Mississippi State Museum. S. S. .S. 5. 5. oc- rov- stri- eras- flori- reata neri dulans sipes dana S. ocreata 13 S. rovneri 3 12 S. stridulans 3 0 6 S. crassipes 1 1 1 4 S. floridana 0 0 0 1 1 behavior is potentially important as an isolating mechanism. This has been studied extensively for S. ocreata and S. rovneri (Stratton & Uetz 1981, 1983, 1986) but to a more limited extent in S. stridulans and S. ocreata (Stratton, in prep). More is known of the habitat preferences for S. ocreata than for the other species in the genus, and this preference appears to vary geographi- cally. Dondale and Redner (1978) report that S. ocreata tend to be found in moist areas relative to S. crassipes and S. floridana. In North and South Carolina, Missouri (Big Oak Tree State Park), as well as in Sand Ridge State Forest in central Illinois, S. ocreata was collected on the floodplains of rivers or near wet areas. For ex- ample, along the flood plain of the Tyger River in S. Carolina, S. ocreata appeared to be the most abundant wolf spider; in Big Oak Tree State Park, a virgin floodplain forest along the Mississippi River in Missouri, S. ocreata again appeared to STRATTON -5C///Z(9CO&4 STRIDULANS, NEW SPECIES 35 be the most abundant wolf spider (Fig. 1 7). Col- lections in Illinois, Kentucky, and Ohio yielded S. ocreata from the drier uplands and often on slopes above major rivers (Fig. 16), while other species (particularly S. rovneri) were found on floodplains and bottomlands (Fig. 17). Perhaps the habitat “preference” of S. ocreata may par- tially depend on geographic locality (and its many associated factors) and/or possibly on the pres- ence or absence of other competing species. Cady (1983) in a study in south central Ohio, reports that S. ocreata is closely restricted in its micro- habitat and that its distribution and locomotor activity are related to moisture and physical fea- tures of the microhabitat. Cady found that S. ocreata was more likely to be found in full leaf litter rather than in sparse litter, and that the species preferred areas of high soil moisture. He 36 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY IL Ml IL MA Figure 15.— Comparison of relative numbers of 5. stridulans n. sp. and related species in floodplain forest and uplands forest along major river systems in the U.S. Midwest. The X-axis of each graph shows numbers of spiders collected/person-hour (most collections were 2-3 person-hours). Collections were done by the author in 1984 and 1985. From top and clockwise: IL MI = Illinois: Marshall Co., State Fish and Wildlife Area; IL MA = Illinois: Bureau Co., Miller Anderson Nature Preserve; IL AL = Illinois: Alexander Co.; KY CB = Kentucky: Hickman Co., Columbus-Belmont Battlefield State Park; AL Ld = Alabama: Lauderdale Co. (along Tennessee River); MO B.O.T. = Missouri: Mississippi Co., Big Oak Tree State Park; MO TT = Missouri: Cape STRATTON -^C/Z/ZOCOS/l STRIDULANS, NEW SPECIES 37 a> ■s a m k. « n E Rivers: IL IL Mi/IL IL Key: ^ oereata 0 rovneri 1 I stridulans ^ species “B” Mo TT Mi Mo Mi Tn Figure 16.— Comparison of relative numbers of Schizocosa species collected from uplands habitat. Key as in Fig. 15. suggests that microhabitat selection by S. oereata is important in courtship. The habitat of S. rovneri is generally floodplain forests (Uetz & Dondale 1979; Stratton & Uetz 1981, and Fig. 17), although there are reported collections of 5. rovneri from several upland hab- itats in the Cincinnati area (G. W. Uetz, pers. comm.) and in Illinois (Fig. 16). The spiders are most frequently found in or on flattened mud packed leaf litter, or in and on piles of drift that are frequently found in these flood prone eco- systems. In Central Illinois (Mason County), S. oereata, S. rovneri and S. stridulans were all found in close proximity to each other. S. rovneri was found in the Chautauqua National Wildlife Refuge, along the Illinois River. It was also collected in other floodplain forests along the Illinois River. A population of S. oereata was found in a swampy area within the Sand Ridge State Forest. An ad- jacent area that was slightly higher in elevation and slightly more mesic yielded S. stridulans. These populations and their habitats were in- vestigated in some detail and will be reported separately (Stratton, in prep). The distribution patterns within this complex of three sibling species are intriguing. While S. oereata and S. rovneri are sympatric and occa- sionally syntopic, and while S. oereata and S. stridulans are also occasionally syntopic, S. stri- dulans and S', rovneri are apparently never syn- topic. It appears that both S. rovneri and S. stri- dulans are stenotypic, whereas S. oereata is comparatively eurytypic. More investigations with the detail of Cady’s (1983) study are needed to understand the interactioh of these spiders with their habitat. It appears that courtship behavior of these spe- cies may be very habitat specific. It is hypothe- sized that the stridulatory component of the courtship behavior in S. stridulans may be in- audible (and ineffective) on anything but dry leaves. The courtship behavior of S. stridulans is most similar to that of S. crassipes and S. Girardeau Co., Trail of Tears State Park; MO St C/Bab = Missouri: St. Louis Co., Babler State Park; IL Cl = Illinois: Calhoun Co., Reds Landing Waterfowl Management Area; IL PM = Illinois: Jersey Co., Pere Marquette State Park. 38 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Rivers: 24- 22- 20- 18- 16 14 12 10- 8- 6 4-1 2 Schizocosa species, Floodplains IL Al IL Ml IL Cl IL MA MoStC Key: rovneri ocreata IL IL IL Mi/IL Mo Mi Mi Ty Figure 17.— Comparison of relative numbers of Schizocosa species collected from floodplain habitats. Key as in Fig. 15. floridana (Stratton in prep), both of which are also restricted to mesic habitats (Dondale & Red- ner 1978; Stratton, unpubl. data). Through this study and others, a more complete understand- ing of Schizocosa stridulans will contribute to our understanding of the evolution of this genus. Material examined.— USA: lllinios: Mason Co., Sand Ridge State Forest, May-June 1985 (G. Stratton and L. Hartz), 15 males, 15 females (MCZ); Jersey Co., Pere Marquette State Park, 29 May 1984 (G. Stratton, L. Williams), 4 males (GES). Ohio: Athens Co., Strouds Run State Park, June 1986 (J. Rovner), 1 male (GES). Missouri: St Louis Co., Babler State Park, 1 June 1984 (G. Stratton, L. Williams), 10 males (GES); Cape Gi- rardeau Co., Trail of Tears State Park, Oak Forest Up- lands, 25 June 1984 (G. Stratton and L. Williams), 18 m.ales, 1 1 females (MCZ). Tennessee: Lawrence Co., Davy Crockett State Park, ravine slope, 16 May 1983 (W. P. Maddison), 9 males, 7 females (MCZ); Knox Co., near Powell, oak forest, 23, 30 June 1981 (G. Stratton), 5 males, 1 2 females (MCZ). Kentucky: Row- an Co., Daniel Boone National Forest, Twin Knob Recreation Area, 14 May 1983 (W. P. Maddison), 4 males, 3 females (MCZ); Hickman Co., Columbus Bel- mont Battle Field State Park, 3 June 1984 (G. Stratton, L. Williams) 1 male (GES). Alabama: Lauderdale Co., above Tennessee River, 18 June 1984 (G. Stratton, L. Williams), 1 male, 1 female (GES). Mississippi: Pon- totoc Co., Natchez Trace Parkway, 17 May 1983 (W. P. Maddison), 4 females (MCZ), 1 mi. SE of Ecru, pitfall in deciduous forests May-June 1980 (W. H. Cross), 7 males (MSM); Claiborne Co., Rocky Springs Park, 17 May 1983 (W. P. Maddison), 5 males, 6 fe- males (MCZ). (Note: MCZ refers to Museum of Com- parative Zoology, Harvard University, MSM to Mis- sissippi State Museum, and GES to the personal collection of the author.) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks are extended to G. Uetz for his ongoing interest and support and to C. Dondale for ex- amining specimens and providing encourage- ment. The comments of A. Brady and C. Don- dale greatly improved the quality of the manuscript. I wish to thank W. Maddison for collecting wolf spiders, and to L. Williams and L. Hartz for assistance with field work. Thanks are extended to R. Schmitter for teaching me to use the scanning electron microscope. B. Gib- bons provided the drawings of the legs and M. Knapp helped with some of the measurements. Financial support was provided by the Cottrell Research Corporation and Bradley Board for Re- search and Creativity. LITERATURE CITED Cady, A. B. 1984. Microhabitat selection and loco- motor activity of Schizocosa ocreata (Walckenaer) (Araneae: Lycosidae). J. Arachnol., 11:297-307. Dondale, C. D. & J. H. Redner. 1978. Revision of STRATTON -5C///Z<9C(9S^ STRIDULANS, NEW SPECIES 39 the nearctic wolf spider genus Schizocosa (Araneida; Lycosidae). Canad. EntomoL, 110:143-181. Stratton, G. E. & G. W. Uetz. 1981. Acoustic com- munication and reproductive isolation in two spe- cies of wolf spiders. Science, 214:575-577. Stratton, G. E. & G. W. Uetz. 1983. Communication via substratum-coupled stridulation and reproduc- tive isolation in wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim. Behav., 31:164-172. Stratton, G. E. & G. W. Uetz. 1986. The inheritance of courtship behavior and its role as a reproductive isolating mechanism in two species of Schizocosa wolf spiders. Evolution, 40:129-141. Uetz, G. W. & G. Denterlein. 1979. Courtship be- havior, habitat and reproductive isolation in Schi- zocosa rovneri Uetz and Dondale (Araneae: Lycos- idae). J. ArachnoL, 7:121-128. Uetz, G. W. & C. D. Dondale. 1979. A new wolf spider in the genus Schizocosa (Araneae: Lycosidae) from Illinois. J. ArachnoL, 7:86-87. Manuscript received August 1989, revised August 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:40-48 ONTOGENETIC AND SEASONAL CHANGES IN WEBS AND WEBSITES OF A DESERT WIDOW SPIDER Yael Lubin and Mandy Kotzman: Mitrani Center for Desert Ecology, Blaustein Institute for Desert Research, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer Campus 84990 Israel Stephen Ellner: Biomathematics Graduate Program, Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina USA Abstract. Morphometric and nest position variables were used to examine the effects of spider growth and seasonality on webs and websites of the desert widow spider, Latrodectus revivensis Shulov (Theridiidae) in the Negev desert of Israel. The form of the web was similar over the full range of spider body sizes. All morphometric variables had strong positive correlations with spider size: larger spiders occupied larger nests in larger shrubs. However, nest characteristics were more highly correlated with spider size than were website char- acteristics. When the effect of spider size was removed by regression, more than 75% of the remaining variance consisted of correlated variation in three groups of variables relating to ( 1 ) website characteristics (48%), (2) nest characteristics ( 1 8%) and (3) capture web placement (12%). Most nest and website variables showed effects of seasonality that were independent of spider size, and may be related to the thermal regime in the nest. The results indicate that the relative quality of potential websites changes seasonally and with spider growth. We suggest that the costs of relocating a web outweigh the advantages of reaching a new website, with the result that spiders remain for some time in websites which have become less suitable. The habitat requirements of many organisms change as they age, resulting in a shifts of their “ontogenetic niche” (Werner & Gilliam 1984). Ontogenetic changes in habitat may involve changes in living sites, in food requirements or in other factors which scale with body size. Such size-related changes in habitat requirements may have particularly important fitness consequences for sedentary animals for which the possibilities of moving to new sites may be limited (e.g., Sha- chak & Brand 1983). Web-building spiders are relatively sedentary predators (Janetos 1 986). In most species the web is primarily a prey-capture device whose location and structure reflect the local distribution of prey (Riechert & Luczak 1982; Janetos 1986; Riechert & Gillespie 1986). Thus, studies of website re- quirements have focused mainly on the effects of prey abundance (e.g., T umbull 1 964; Gillespie 1981; Olive 1980, 1982; Vollrath 1985). The changing requirements of developing spiders are also likely to affect web structure and website selection (Enders 1975; Vollrath 1987). How- ever, these have not been examined systemati- cally, and it is not known to what extent changes in web and website characteristics are due to growth, seasonal factors or other effects. In this study, we use morphometric and nest position variables to characterize ontogenetic and seasonal changes in the webs and websites of the desert widow spider Latrodectus revivensis Shu- lov. Statistical analysis of these data allows us to separate the variation in web and website char- acters due to spider sex, size, season, and other factors. In addition, we examine the patterns of covariation among the morphometric variables and their relationships with spider size. NATURAL HISTORY AND METHODS Natural history. — Latrodectus revivensis (Theridiidae) is known only from the Negev des- ert of Israel (Levi & Amitai 1983). Females ma- ture in spring or summer (March to August) and produce eggsacs throughout the summer and au- tumn (May to September; Levy and Amitai 1 983). Incubation time is about one month. Some young emerge in mid- to late summer and overwinter as juveniles. In other instances, eggs remain in LUBIN ET AL.- VARIATION IN WEBS AND WEBSITES OF WIDOW SPIDER 41 Figure 1.— Schematic drawing of the web of L. revivensis, showing (a) website and (b) nest variables measured in this study. NH = nest height, SH = shrub height, CD = distance from the nest to the capture web, CH = height of the capture web, NT = total nest length, DN = length of dense silk layer, DB = length of debris layer, DM = nest diameter at edge of debris layer, MD = maximum nest diameter. the eggsac over the winter and the young emerge the following spring. Webs of L. revivensis are durable and long- lasting structures which may persist for up to several months (Zilberberg 1988). The web con- sists of separate nest and prey-capture compo- nents (Shulov 1948; Szlep 1965; Fig. 1). The nest, built in a shrub, is connected by strong bridging threads of variable length (a few centimeters to over a meter) to a horizontal silk platform. The platform is usually placed over an area of bare ground beyond the edge of the shrub, and an array of sticky capture threads is suspended from the platform to the ground. The nest of L. revivensis consists of a curved, silk cone (Fig. 1). The top of the cone is covered with a dense silk layer, while the lower section is a more open mesh. In addition, the nest top is covered with scattered debris which may in- clude sand, pebbles, snail shells and feces, plant material, exuviae and remains of prey. The dense silk and debris layers are usually sparse or absent on new nests, but may completely obscure the upper half of an old nest. The spiders are active at night and remain con- cealed in the nests during the day. Nocturnal activities include web repairs, renewal of the sticky, capture threads and prey capture. Web relocation also takes place at night. Study area.— The study site was located on the rocky slopes of the Halukim Ridge, near Sede Boqer (30°50'N:34°46'E) in the central Negev region of Israel. The ridge runs north-south and is dissected laterally by dry watercourses pro- ducing a relief of about 50 m. The area is arid with highly variable winter rains (about 100 mm annually) and is sparsely vegetated with a per- manent shrubland (Evenari et al. 1982). Nests of L. revivensis occurred in several shrub species, including Zygophyllum dumosum, Artemesia herba-alba, Reaumuria negevensis, Noaea mu- cronata, and Hammada scoparia, and some- times in clumps of annuals (e.g., Reboudia pin- nata) and grasses. 42 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY The study area was approximately 20 hectares of a north-facing slope of a small wadi. To reduce the effects of habitat heterogeneity, we limited our search for spiders to the lower portion of the slope, from the edge of the wadi bed to a rocky outcrop about 50 m up the slope (Shivta and colluvial formations; Olsvig-Whittaker et al. 1983). Web and website measurements. — We located and individually flagged and mapped webs. Webs and websites were characterized with the follow- ing measurements (Fig. 1): height of the nest, height of the shrub, height of the capture plat- form and its distance from the nest, total nest length, length of the dense silk layer, the maxi- mum length of the debris covering, nest diameter at the lower edge of the debris layer and maxi- mum nest diameter. We also determined the compass orientation of the nest opening (nest aspect) and the quadrant of the shrub in which the nest was located (NE, NW, SE, SW). A total of 350 nests and 226 spiders were sampled in this manner between January and August 1987 and March and August 1988. Spiders in occupied webs were sexed, classified as juvenile, subadult or adult, and measured for total body length and length of the tibia + patella of leg IV. For all statistical analyses, we used body length as a measure of spider size because of convenience of measurement in the field. Body length includes the expandable abdomen and may be influenced by spider condition (Anderson 1974), unlike the more rigid cuticle of the leg segments which does not change size during an instar (Miyashita 1968). However, body length was closely correlated with the length of the tibia + patella in L. revivensis {r^ = 0.92, n = 211), suggesting that for L. revivensis, spider condition did not significantly affect the length of the ab- domen. Statistical analyses.— Comparisons between each pair of morphometric variables were made using standard regression (linear or polynomial) and correlation analyses. To remove heterosce- dasticity, the dependent variable of each analysis was transformed using the Box-Cox family of power transformations with maximum-likeli- hood choice of parameters (Ruppert 1 989; Krebs 1989). Patterns of covariation among morphometric variables were examined by principal compo- nents analysis (PCA; Joliffe 1 986). We calculated the variances and pairwise covariances of all variables. We used pairwise rather than listwise deletion of missing values; although the results of the two methods were nearly identical, listwise deletion greatly reduced the sample sizes for each covariance. PCA identifies a sequence of uncor- related “components” (axes) which are linear combinations of the original variables. The first axis is chosen to “explain” as much as possible of the variance in the data, the second axis ex- plains as much as possible of the remaining vari- ance, and so on. We applied PCA to a correlation matrix of the raw data and of the Box-Cox transformed data (Joliffe 1986). To determine the extent to which spider size alone was the basis of these correla- tions, we removed the effect of spider length by regression: each value was replaced by its resid- ual deviation from a regression on spider length. Quadratic, rather than linear, regression was used in order to stabilize variances. We then applied PCA to the covariance matrix of the residuals. PCA of the covariance matrix of residuals is use- ful in this case, because the variables themselves had already been standardized to equal variance by the data transformations. Consequently, high variance of the residuals indicates a weak cor- relation with spider length. RESULTS Males and females.— Our measurements of male’s webs were restricted to those of juveniles. Adult males often remained in their own juvenile webs {n = 1 7), built small nests lacking capture webs attached to nests of females {n = 5), shared nests of adult or juvenile females (n = 26 and 4, respectively) or occupied abandoned nests of fe- males (n = 4). Webs of juvenile males and females differed significantly in all morphometric variables ex- cept distance from the nest to the capture web. However, when we eliminated the difference in size between males and females by comparing only females of sizes equivalent to juvenile males (<6.5 mm body length. Fig. 2), these differences disappeared. Therefore, web and website char- acteristics of juvenile males and females were treated as a single data set. Effects of spider length.— The total body length of spiders in our sample ranged from 1.8-16.8 mm (x = 7.9, SD = 3.8, n = 246 spider mea- surements; Fig. 2). In the following regression analyses, spider length is treated as an error-free independent variable (Snedecor & Cochran 1 967), because the errors in measuring spider length were small and independent of spider length over LUBIN ET AL.-VARIATION IN WEBS AND WEBSITES OF WIDOW SPIDER 43 JM AM JF AF STAGE, SEX Figure 2.— Total body lengths (in mm) of L. revi- vensis used in the study: boxes show the means (center lines) and one standard deviation and vertical lines show ranges for juvenile and adult males (JM and AM, respectively) and for juvenile and adult females (JF and AF, respectively). Juvenile males were all sub- adults; j uvenile females included all immature and sub- adult stages. the range of sizes encountered (r’ = 0.04, P > 0.1; based on 5 replicate measurements of each of 29 spiders). Pooling all measurements, the standard deviation of the measurement error was 0.23 mm (95% Cl: 0. 1 9-0.29 mm), which is much smaller than the standard deviation of spider length in our full data set (SD = 3.84 mm, n = 252 spiders). Spider length explained a significant amount of the variation in all web and website variables (Table \, P < 0.001 in all cases). The amount of variation explained by spider length was higher for variables that describe the nest itself (total Table 2.— Allometric regression equations for nest morphometric variables: In y - fio + a,\n X, where X = nest total length. All regressions are significant at P < 0.001 {Ho. a, = 0). Variable n f- ao a, Dense silk 290 0.67 0.21 0.70 Debris 291 0.79 -0.31 0.91 Nest diameter 287 0.84 -0.65 0.93 Maximum diameter 135 0.83 -0.78 1.01 nest length, lengths of dense silk and debris lay- ers, and nest diameters) than for variables as- sociated with nest placement in the shrub (shrub height and nest height) or with the capture web (height and distance from the nest). Nest placement and allometry.— The height of the nest in a shrub was closely correlated with shrub height. Over the entire range of shrub heights of 15 to 122 cm, nest height was ap- proximately % of shrub height (r^ = 72.7%, n = 318). The allometric equation, nest height = 0.69(shrub height)"’®, only slightly improved the amount of variance explained by shrub height {P- = 73.0%). Variation in the length of the debris layer, nest diameter and maximum nest diameter can be described by allometric regressions on total nest length (Table 2). The length of dense silk in- creased linearly up to nest lengths of approxi- mately 75 mm, but did not increase with further increase in nest length. Variation in this char- acter was best described overall by the allometric equation, dense silk length = 0.2(total nest length)"'' {P = 0.67). Table 1 . — Regression equations for the effect of spider length on nest and website morphometric variables. The slopes of all of the regressions are significantly different from zero {P < 0.001). The equations are of the form: = ao± a,x + a2X\ where x = spider length. Variables n r~ \ a„ a, a2 WEBSITE Nest height 111 0.27 0.18 1.62 0.02 0.001 Shrub height 111 0.34 0.12 1.44 0.01 0.0001 Capture web distance 142 0.21 0.11 1.32 -0.004 0.0009 Capture web height 46 0.52 -0.06 0.89 -0.006 0.0001 NEST Nest length 175 0.85 0.47 1.74 0.88 -0.025 Dense silk length 172 0.66 0.19 1.2 0.13 -0.005 Debris length 173 0.76 0.27 1.27 0.23 -0.008 Nest diameter 171 0.90 0.14 1.14 0.07 -0.002 Maximum diameter 109 0.92 0.18 1.12 0.13 -0.004 44 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 3.— Correlations among website and nest variables. Correlations based on the raw data are shown above the diagonal; below the diagonal are the correlations among residuals, after removing the effect of spider length by regression (see Methods: Statistical analyses). NH = nest height, SH = shrub height, CD = distance from nest to capture web, CH = capture web height, NT = total nest length, DN = length of dense silk layer, DB = length of debris layer, DM = nest diameter. * = nonsignificant correlations (P > 0.05). NH SH CD CH NT DN DB DM NH 0.85 0.64 0.43 0.55 0.32 0.47 0.48 SH 0.81 0.54 0.46 0.63 0.37 0.54 0.56 CD 0.63 0.49 0.31 0.41 0.19 0.42 0.41 CH ♦ * * 0.77 0.39 0.66 0.65 NT 0.25 0.23 * 0.42 0.71 0.87 0.91 DN -0.14 * -0.22 * 0.37 0.77 0.69 DB * ♦ * 0.27 0.46 0.57 0.87 DM * ♦ * * 0.45 0.42 0.48 Covariation of web and website variables. — All variables were significantly and positively cor- related with each other (Table 3; < 0.0 1 , except for the height of the capture web against its dis- tance from the nest, 0.02 < P < 0.05). The re- siduals had fewer significant correlations and some negative correlations, indicating that many correlations in the original variables were due to the effect of spider length on all variables. As a result, PCA of web and website variables using the raw data was not very informative (Table 4). The first axis, which accounted for 63% of the variance, loaded evenly on all variables and sim- ply reflects the positive correlation among the variables; the remaining axes could not be in- terpreted intuitively. Clearer patterns were found in PCA of the re- siduals after removing the effects of spider length. Website variables (nest height, shrub height, and distance to the capture web) accounted for 48% of the residual variance (PCA axis 1, Table 4). The second axis, which loaded mainly on nest- concealment variables (dense silk and debris), accounted for 1 8% of the residual variance, and the third axis loaded mainly on capture web height (12% of the residual variance). Thus over 78% of the variance in web and website morphomet- ric data may be summarized by four independent axes of variation: spider size and the three clus- ters of morphometric variables identified by the first three PCA axes. Seasonal differences in nest and website char- acteristics.—Climatic conditions in the central Negev differ considerably in winter and summer. There is a “cold season” (November to April; mean monthly temperature 13.4° C, range of Table 4. — Principal components analysis (PCA) of website and nest variables. The first two PCA axes are shown for the PCA based on the raw data (left side of table) and the first three PCA axes based on analysis of the residuals, after removing the effect of spider length (right side of table). The percent of the variance explained by each axis is shown. Variables are abbreviated as in Table 3. PCA axes based on Data Residuals Variable 1 2 1 2 3 % Variance explained 63 16 48 18 12 NH 0.12 0.20 0.32 0.03 -0.07 SH 0.12 0.15 0.27 0.03 -0.10 CD 0.09 0.19 0.28 -0.06 0.10 CH 0.12 -0.05 0.03 0.17 0.41 NT 0.15 -0.07 0.04 0.14 0.03 DN 0.11 -0.15 -0.05 0.25 -0.20 DB 0.14 -0.10 0.01 0.22 -0.05 DM 0.14 -0.08 0 0.10 -0.05 LUBIN ET AL.- VARIATION IN WEBS AND WEBSITES OF WIDOW SPIDER 45 Table 5.— A comparison of spider website and nest variables in “hot” and “cool” seasons. Shown are means and standard deviations of all measurements and probabilities for /-tests performed on the raw data (Pdata) and on the residuals, after removing the effeet of spider length (P,es,d)- SL = spider length, MD = maximum nest diameter; all other abbreviations as in Table 3. * = P < 0.05, ** = />< 0.01, *** = P < 0.001. Variable Cool Hot P dala P rcsid Mean SD N Mean SD N SL (mm) 7.2 2.8 126 8.6 4.5 126 — NH (cm) 20.2 9.7 139 29.1 13.0 180 *** SH (cm) 31.7 11.6 140 43.4 18.2 180 *** CD (cm) 13.4 7.9 95 28.3 19.9 71 CH (cm) 12.3 2.7 32 11.1 6.3 16 ns ns NT (mm) 55.2 22.4 118 65.8 37.3 178 ns DN (mm) 25.4 10.0 114 19.8 9.2 177 *** DB (mm) 31.6 11.8 114 31.9 19.8 178 ns *** DM (mm) 22.4 9.3 112 26.1 16.3 176 * MD (mm) 29.7 10.9 34 41.1 22.2 101 *** means 9.8-18.0° C) and a “hot season” (May to October, mean monthly temperature 23.4° C, range 21.1-25.5° C). There were statistically significant seasonal dif- ferences in most of the morphometric variables, both in the raw data and after removing the effect of spider length (Table 5). In the hot season, spiders were found in taller shrubs, built nests higher above the ground and built capture webs further from their nests. Nest diameter and max- imum diameter were both greater in the hot sea- son, but the dense silk layer was shorter in the hot season. Nests were longer in the hot season, but this appears to be the result of the seasonal difference in spider length (Table 5). The height of the capture web did not vary between seasons. In the hot season, nests occurred more fre- quently on the east side of shrubs than on the west side (x- = 8.85, P < 0.005, n = 76 nests), but their distribution with respect to the N-S axis was random (x- = 0.47, P > 0.1). In the cold season the distribution of nests with respect to shrub quadrant was random (x^ = 0.728, P > 0A,n= 125). The orientation of the nest opening was not significantly different from random in both seasons (Rayleigh test; cold season: 106 nests; hot season: 68 nests), nor were there sig- nificant differences among webs of juveniles and adults in either season. DISCUSSION Scaling of nest and website components.— The form of the web is remarkably constant over the full range of spider sizes, from newly emerged young to adults. Webs of juvenile males did not differ from those of similar-sized juvenile fe- males. Eggsac nests made by some females ap- peared to be wider and more barrel-shaped than nests made by subadult and juvenile females, possibly to accommodate the large, spherical sacs. Nest diameter and the lengths of the layers of dense silk and debris all scaled allometrically with total nest length. For linear dimensions of the nest, isometry is the appropriate null model. However, nest dimensions also scale to body size, and the allometric equation (v = ax'’) is generally a good descriptor of body size relationships (Pe- ters 1983). Allometric scaling may indicate that a functional relationship exists among the vari- ables which depends on their geometry (La- Barbara 1989). Both the dense silk layer and the debris pro- vide protection for the spider from predators, whether mechanically or by crypsis (Konigswald et al. 1990). In the initial stages of nest construc- tion, L. revivensis builds a thin silk cap, consist- ing of a few threads only (which will become the top of the nest), and then descends to the ground and carries up bits of debris which it attaches to the top of the cap. Thus, protection from visu- ally-orienting predators is obtained quickly and with a minimal outlay of silk and activity, both of which are energetically expensive (Lubin 1973; Prestwich 1977). If the spider remains at that website, both debris and dense silk are added to the nest on successive nights. Nests in the hot season had proportionately shorter lengths of dense silk relative to the debris layer. This may be related to the thermal regime within the nest. Temperatures during the day 46 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY inside the dense-silk portion of the nest were consistently higher than in the lower, open mesh portion of the nest, due to the greater flow of cool air through the open mesh portion than through the dense silk (Lubin et al. unpubl.). By increas- ing the size of the debris layer without a con- comitant increase in the dense silk, shade and protection are provided without reducing airflow through the nest. Nests were generally placed % of the way up the shrub, but were located significantly higher in the hot season than in the cold season. The portion of the shrub above the nest can provide substantial shade and concealment from visual predators (Konigswald et al. 1990). In summer, spiders place their nests higher in shrubs (and in taller shrubs), perhaps in order to take better advantage of convective cooling. The placement of large nests in large shrubs is intuitively ob- vious, as small shrubs may provide insufficient support and cover for large nests. It is less clear why small nests are not found in large shrubs. Given the tendency for nests to be built % of the way up in shrubs, the upper branches of large shrubs may be unsuitable (e.g., too widely spaced) for suspending small nests. Somewhat surprisingly, nest openings were random with respect to compass orientation both in summer and winter. In open habitats, a di- urnal orb-weaver, Micrathena gracilis (Walcke- naer), was shown to orient its web to reduce ex- posure to direct insolation (Biere & Uetz 1981). Similarly, the funnel openings of a desert age- lenid, Agelenopsis aperta (Gertsch) tend to face north in summer (Riechert & Tracy 1975). Both species, however, were exposed regularly to di- rect solar radiation, the former while sitting on its web and the latter while basking and hunting. Latrodectus revivensis is mainly nocturnal and does not bask. Sources of variation in web and website char- acteristics.—The sources of variation in web and website characteristics separate into three main components: (1) spider size, (2) seasonal effects and (3) residual variation. All morphometric variables had strong positive correlations with spider size: larger spiders occupied larger nests in larger shrubs. Nest-size variables were more tightly correlated with spider length than were website or capture web variables. Seasonal dif- ferences accounted for some variation in most web and website characters after removing the effect of spider length. Nearly half of the variance not accounted for by spider length or by seasonal effects consists of correlated variation in website and capture web characteristics (residual PCA axis 1). An ad- ditional 18% was attributed to correlated vari- ation in nest characteristics (axis 2). Distance to the capture web was a component of axis 1; thus, a larger shrub is associated with a greater distance to the capture web. However, the variation in the height of the capture web was also identified as a separate component of the PCA (axis 3). We conclude that the capture web and nest are rel- atively independent structures, and factors af- fecting capture web and nest placement may dif- fer. The residual variance in websites not account- ed for by either spider size or seasonal effects may be due to imprecise site selection (see Ja- netos & Cole 1981), or to other factors that we did not measure. Such factors may include: vari- ation in body condition, hunger and reproduc- tive status of the spider, spatial and temporal variation in food supply. Riechert (1974) docu- mented the importance of relatively short-lived phenomena (e.g., the presence of ffowers and oth- er insect attractants) in explaining the distribu- tion of a desert web-building spider, Agelenopsis aperta (Agelenidae), and showed that such cues may influence the choice of a website (Riechert 1985). In orb-weaving spiders, which may re- locate their webs frequently, site selection and movement have been correlated with the avail- ability of web supports (Enders 1975; Hodge 1 987a), the degree of disturbance to webs (Hodge 1987b) and food availability (Olive 1982; Voll- rath 1985). The residual variance in nest characteristics may reflect differences in site quality, for ex- ample, in the thermal regimes prevailing in dif- ferent shrubs or the presence of suitable debris for nest concealment. The amounts of dense silk and debris might vary with immediate needs for crypsis against a heterogeneous background, or in response to the perceived risk of predation. In some orb-web spiders, variable development of stabilimenta (lines or zigzags of dense silk in the orb; Robinson & Robinson 1970) and of other web “decorations” (e.g., bits of debris) has been correlated with their degree of exposure to visual predators (Eberhard 1973; Lubin 1975, 1986). These results suggest that the relative quality of different websites changes seasonally and with the spider’s ontogeny. Changes in nest require- ments can be accommodated by modification of the existing nest or the construction of a new nest LUBIN ET AL.- VARIATION IN WEBS AND WEBSITES OF WIDOW SPIDER 47 at the same site, but changes in website require- ments may necessitate moving to a new site. While nests are modified regularly and are there- fore tightly correlated with spider size, the large variation observed in shrub and capture web characteristics suggests that the spiders remain for some time in websites that have become less suitable. Nonetheless, website relocation occurs several times in the spider’s lifetime (Zilberberg 1988) and the choice of new websites is influ- enced by the spider’s size and by the time of year. The decision to move to a new website may re- flect a trade-olf between the advantages of reach- ing a more suitable website and the costs of re- locating, such as an increased risk of predation and the energetic costs of movement and web construction. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS B. Roth and A. Kotzman helped with the field work and D. Ward and Y. Ayal commented on a draft of the manuscript. We are grateful for their help. The study was supported by the U.S.- Israel Binational Science Foundation (Grant #8600092 to YL and SE, and a Bergmann Me- morial Research Award to SE). This is Publi- cation No. 106 of the Mitrani Center for Desert Ecology, Blaustein Institute for Desert Research. REFERENCES CITED Anderson, J. F. 1974. Responses to starvation in the spiders Lycosa lenta Hentz and Filistata hibernalis (Hentz). Ecology, 55:576-585. Atkinson, A. C. 1985. Plots, Transformations and Regression. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Biere, J. M. & G. W. Uetz. 1981. Web orientation in the spider Micrathena gracilis (Araneae: Aranei- dae). Ecology, 62:336-344. Eberhard, W. G. 1973. Stabilimenta on the webs of Uloborus diversus (Araneae: Uloboridae) and other spiders. Journal of Zoology, London, 171:367-384. Enders, F. 1974. Vertical stratification in orb-web spiders (Araneidae, Araneae) and a consideration of other methods of coexistence. Ecology, 55:31 7-328. Enders, F. 1975. Change in web site in Argiope spi- ders (Araneidae). Amer. Midi. Natur., 94:484-490. Evenari, M., L. Shanan & N. Tadmor. 1982. The Negev: The Challenge of a Desert. Harvard Uni- versity Press, Cambridge. Gillespie, R. G. 1981. The quest for prey by the web- building spider, Amaurobius similis (Blackwell). Anim. Behav., 29:953-954. Hodge, M. A. 1987a. Macrohabitat selection by the orb weaving spider, Micrathena gracilis. Psyche, 94: 347-361. Hodge, M. A. 1987b. Factors influencing web site residence time of the orb weaving spider, Micrathe- na gracilis. Psyche, 94:363-371. Janetos, A. C. 1986. Web-site selection: Are we ask- ing the right questions? Pp. 9-22, In Spiders: Webs, Behavior, and Evolution (W. A. Shear, ed.). Stan- ford University Press, Stanford, California. Janetos, A. C. & B. J. Cole. 1981. Imperfectly optimal animals. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 9:203-209. Joliffe, I. T. 1986. Principal Component Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York. Konigswald, A., Y. D. Lubin & D. Ward. 1990. The effectiveness of the nest of a desert widow spider in predator deterrence. Psyche, 97:75-80. Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper and Row, New York. LaBarbara, M. 1989. The evolution and ecology of body size. Pp. 69-98, In Patterns and Processes in the History of Life (D. M. Raup & D. Jablonski, eds.). Dahlem Konferenzen 1986. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Levy, G. & P. Amitai. 1983. Revision of the widow- spider genus Latrodectus (Araneae: Theridiidae) in Israel. Zool. J. Linnean Society, 77:39-63. Lubin, Y. D. 1973. Web structure and function: The nonadhesive orb-web of Cyrtophora nwluccensis (Doleschall) (Araneae: Araneidae). Forma et Func- tio, 6:337-358. Lubin, Y. D. 1975. Stabilimenta and barrier webs in the orb webs of Argiope argentata (Araneae: Ara- neidae) on Daphne and Santa Cruz Islands, Gala- pagos. J. Arachnol., 2:1 19-126. Lubin, Y. D. 1986. Web building and prey capture in the Uloboridae. Pp. 132-171, In Spiders: Webs, Behavior, and Evolution (W. A. Shear, ed.). Stan- ford University Press, Stanford, California. Miyashita, K. 1968. Quantitative feeding biology of Lycosa T-insignata Boes. et Str. (Araneae: Lycosi- dae). Bull. Nat. Inst. Agric. Sci., 22:329-344. Olive, C. W. 1980. Foraging specializations in orb- weaving spiders. Ecology, 61:1 133-1 144. Olive, C. W. 1982. Behavioral response of a sit-and- wait predator to spatial variation in foraging gain. Ecology, 63:912-920. Olsvig- Whittaker, L., M. Shachak & A. Yair. 1983. Vegetation patterns related to environmental factors in a Negev desert watershed. Vegetatio, 54; 1 53-1 65. Peters, R. H. 1983. The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, Australia. Prestwich, K. N. 1977. The energetics of web-build- ing in spiders. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 57A:321- 326. Riechert, S. E. 1974. The pattern of local web dis- tribution in a desert spider: Mechanisms and sea- sonal variation. J. Anim. Ecol., 43:733-746. Riechert, S. E. 1985. Decisions in multiple goal con- texts: Habitat selection of the spider, Agelenopsis aperta (Gertsch). Z. Tierpsychol., 70:53-69. Riechert, S. E. & R. G. Gillespie. 1986. Habitat choice 48 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY and utilization in web-building spiders. Pp. 23-48, In Spiders: Webs, Behavior, and Evolution (W. A. Shear, ed.). Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. Riechert, S. E. & J. Luczak. 1982. Spider foraging: Behavioral responses to prey. Pp. 353-386, In Spi- der Communication: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance (P. N. Witt & J. S. Rovner, eds.). Princeton University Press, Princeton. Riechert, S. E. & C. D. Tracy. 1975. Thermal balance and prey availablity: Bases for a model relating web- site characteristics to spider reproductive success. Ecology, 56:265-284. Robinson, M. H. & B. Robinson. 1970. The stabi- limentum of the orb web spider, Argiope argentata: An improbable defence against predators. Can. En- tomol., 102:641-655. Ruppert, D. 1989. Fitting mathematical models to biological data: A review of recent developments. Pp. 250-26 1 , In Mathematical Approaches to Prob- lems in Resource Management and Epidemiology (C. Castillo-Chavez, S. A. Levin & C. A. Shoemaker, eds.). Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, Vol. 81. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Shachak, M. & S. Brand. 1983. The relationship be- tween sit-and-wait foraging strategy and dispersal in the desert scorpion, Scorpio maurus palmatus. Oecologia, 60:371-377. Shulov, A. 1 948. Latrodectus revivensis sp. nov. from Palestine. Ecology, 29:209-215. Snedecor, G. W. & W. G. Cochran. 1967. Statistical Methods. Sixth Edition, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa. Szlep, R. 1965. The web-spinning process and web structure of Latrodectus tredecimguttatus, L. palli- das and L. revivensis. Proc. Zool. Soc., London, 145: 75-89. Turnbull, A. L. 1964. The search for prey by a web- building spider, Achaearanea tepidariorum (C. L. Koch) (Araneae, Theridiidae). Can. Entomol., 96: 568-579. Vollrath, F. 1985. Web spider’s dilemma: A risky move or site-dependent growth. Oecologia, 68:69- 72. Vollrath, F. 1987. Growth, foraging and reproductive success. Pp. 357-370, In Ecophysiology of Spiders (W. Nentwig, ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Werner, E. E. & J. F. Gilliam. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System., 15:393^25. Zilberberg, G. 1988. Behavioral ecology ofthe widow spider, Latrodectus revivensis Shulov (Araneae: Ar- aneidae). Shappirit (J. Israel Entomol. Center), 6: 52-76 (in Hebrew, with English summary). Manuscript received February 1990, revised July 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:49-54 DISPERSAL AND SURVIVORSHIP IN A POPULATION OF GEOLYCOSA TURRICOLA (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) Patricia R. Miller:' Department of Entomology, Mississippi Entomological Museum, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762 USA Gary L. Miller: Department of Biology, The University of Mississippi, University, Mis- sissippi 38677 USA Abstract. A population of the burrowing wolf spider Geolycosa turricola in Mississippi was monitored over a period of 4 years. Weekly censuses of the number of burrows that were active, open but not active, or inactive were taken. The timing of the dispersal of spiderlings was examined by use of caging experiments. A habitat manipulation experiment was used to assess burrow site preferences. This population reproduced on a 2-year cycle; no young were produced in even years. The results suggest that some dispersing spiderlings construct burrows immediately after leaving their mother’s burrow while others overwinter and build their first burrow during the spring. Two dispersing groups are identified and are shown to have different survivorship properties. The importance of this dispersal strategy in terms of subsocial behavior is discussed. A number of field studies of the population dynamics of the obligate burrowing wolf spiders {Geolycosa) have been undertaken in recent years (e.g., McQueen 1978, 1983; Conley 1985). For the most part these studies have confirmed the incidental observations of Wallace (1942): mul- tiyear life cycles predominate (McQueen 1978), dispersal of young from the maternal burrow oc- curs in the early summer (McQueen 1978, 1983; Conley 1985) and may be by ballooning (Miller 1984a; McQueen 1978), and mortality of spi- derlings is high (Humphreys 1976; McQueen 1978). However, several questions regarding the population dynamics of these spiders remain un- answered. Chief among these are questions re- lating to the timing of initial burrow construction in relation to the onset of dispersal, burrow site preference and tenacity, and the extent to which the timing of dispersal and the size of the dis- persing spider affects survivorship. Here we ad- dress these issues in a multiyear study of the dynamics of a population of Geolycosa turricola (Treat). METHODS We studied a population of Geolycosa turricola near Starkville, Mississippi, continuously be- tween 1982 and 1985. The population inhabited 'Present address: Department of Science and Mathe- matics, Northwest Mississippi Community College Senatobia, Mississippi 38668 USA a 1 ha Selma Chalk deposit (Harper 1857; Miller 1984b) surrounded on three sides by thick growths of southern red cedar {Juniperus silicicola) and on the other side by a dirt road. The predominant vegetation, beard grass (Andropogon sp.), oc- curred in large clumps interspersed with bare and litter-covered ground. A number of small isolated populations of G. turricola occurred in similar habitats within a 6 km radius of the study population. These pop- ulations were monitored periodically to deter- mine the extent of interpopulation variation in the timing of reproduction and dispersal. In the fall of 1982 and early spring of 1983, prior to the onset of the dispersal of young, all burrows in the field were marked with numbered surveyor’s flags. Beginning in the spring of 1983 the population was censused at approximately weekly intervals between March and October of each year and once a month at other times of the year. During each census, a search of the field was conducted and previously undiscovered bur- rows of spiderlings were marked. We assumed in this study that changes in burrow diameter represented growth by the spider occupying that burrow. Therefore, the largest diameter (mm) of each newly discovered and previously marked burrow was recorded. Burrow diameter has been shown to be a good indicator of both spider age (McQueen 1978) and size (McQueen 1978; Mil- ler & Miller 1984) for Geolycosa spiders. The state of each burrow was recorded as: ( 1 ) 50 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY active (burrow and burrow turret in good repair and/or spider seen in burrow), (2) open/inactive (burrow and turret in disrepair but burrow open- ing present), (3) disappeared (not found; previ- ously marked burrows only). Burrowing wolf spi- ders may block the entrance of their burrows with silk and debris during certain times of the year, particularly during late summer through spring (Miller & Miller unpublished data). Be- cause of this, every burrow that was scored as disappeared was reexamined in subsequent cen- suses. Renewed activity at a burrow previously marked as disappeared resulted in the reassign- ment of that burrow as active. We assumed that burrows that appeared active were, in fact, occupied by a spider even though this was not confirmed in every case. Errors in this regard will lead to an overestimation of pop- ulation size. However, our intent was to study dispersal timing and survivorship not to make estimates of population size or density per se. We also assumed that burrows were occupied by the original inhabitant. Studies of the activity patterns of Geolycosa (e.g., McQueen & Culik 1981) suggest that this is a reasonable assump- tion. A preliminary examination of the census data suggested that dispersal involved two groups of spiderlings of different size (an early summer group of small size and a late summer group of a larger size.) To substantiate this, the size of these two groups was compared. The survivor- ship of these two groups was compared over two winters (1983 and 1984). Caging experiments were used to determine whether the beginning of dispersal corresponded to the beginning of burrow building activity in G. turricola. In these studies, a wire cage with a 10 cm radius (fine mesh window screen) was placed over six burrows that contained predis- persal young. The inside walls of the cages were examined several times each week and spider- lings that were found on the cage wall or on the ground outside the burrow were scored as dis- persers and removed. Small crickets were intro- duced into the burrow periodically (about once each week) for food. To determine whether newly dispersed spi- derlings showed any initial burrow site prefer- ence we conducted a habitat manipulation ex- periment in 1985. Prior to dispersal we altered the habitat within 3 m of eight burrows that con- tained young. Each circular area was divided into four pie-shaped areas of equal size, and one of the following treatments was assigned to each pie-shaped area: (1) control (no change), (2) litter enhanced (addition of sufficient litter to make a uniform, 2-cm cover in the area, (3) denuded (all grass and litter removed, (4) litter removed (litter raked out, grass left). Because of the small num- ber of burrows used for this experiment, we were not able to completely randomize the experi- ment. We examined these experimental plots during the normal census and recorded the num- ber and size of the burrows constructed in each plot subsection. Statistical comparisons of average burrow di- ameters between months were made with de- pendent (paired) i-tests (tj using burrows that were active in both of the months being com- pared. Independent i-tests {t) were used to com- pare distinct sets of burrows (e.g., newly discov- ered burrows vs previously known burrows). RESULTS Comparisons of the reproductive timing of nearby populations with that of the study pop- ulation revealed that the study population had an unusual breeding schedule characterized by alternating years of production of young. Thus, although some females matured each year in oth- er populations, mature females were found only in alternating years (odd years beginning in 1 983) in the study population. The tabulation of the census data for the gen- eration of spiderlings hatched in the spring of 1983 is given in Table 1. The number of newly discovered and previously marked active bur- rows is given for each month. The total monthly change in the number of burrows represents the number of active burrows from the previous month plus the number of newly discovered ac- tive burrows, minus the number of burrows that disappeared since the previous month (Table 1). Burrow construction by spiderlings began in July and new burrows were discovered through- out the summer (Table 1). In 1 983 a total of 343 burrows were marked between July and October. Most (8 1 .0%) were discovered in July and August (Table 1). In that year, an average of 92.4% of the burrows marked in one month were active in the next month (92.7% July to August, 84.6% August to September, 100% September to Oc- tober). There was an increase in the average burrow diameter between July and August 1983. The average diameter of the 141 burrows that were established in July and recorded as active in Au- MILLER & mLLEK-GEOLYCOSA POPULATION DYNAMICS 51 Table 1.— Survival history of a cohort of Geolycosa turricola. Entries are the number of active burrows (see text). Table includes only spiderlings that hatched in spring 1983. Active burrows Date New Pr. marked Total Diameter (SD) 7-83 152 0 152 4.2(1.03) 8-83 126 141 267 7.0(1.78) 9-83 60 226 286 6.9(1.62) 10-83 5 286 291 — Winter 3-84 0 139 139 8.2 (2.21) 4-84 136 139 275 8.3(1.97) 5-84 2 207 209 9.8 (1.61) 6-84 0 149 149 12.3(2.09) 7-84 0 139 139 14.7(2.61) 8-84 _ — — — 9-84 0 5 5 20.0 (3.74) 10-84 0 5 5 19.3 (3.04) Winter 3-85 0 50 50 — 4-85 0 5 5 — gust increased from X = 4.2 mm (SD = 1.03) to X = 6.9 mm (SD = 1.79) {t^ = 1 1.5, #= 140, P < 0.00 1). The average diameter of the burrows that were established in August (X = 7.1 mm, SD = 2.1 1) was significantly larger than the av- erage diameter of the July burrows {t = 14.53, df = 265, P < 0.001). There was not a difference in the diameter of the burrows established in September when compared to the new burrows ofAugust(/= I33,df= 178, P < 0.001). Because of the difference in initial burrow size between the July and August spiders, the survivorship of those two groups was examined separately. Approximately 48% of the burrows that were established in the summer and fall of 1983 (291; Table 1) were recorded as active in early 1984 (139; Table 1). Of these, 31.6% were of the group that initially established their burrows in July of 1983 and 68.4% were of the group of burrows discovered in August of 1983 (Table 2). Fifteen percent of those burrows that were active in 1 984 were still active in 1985. Approximately two- thirds (76.2%) of these were from the original August 1983 group (Table 2). Forty-seven percent of the burrows that were active in October 1983 reopened in March 1984. The average diameter of these spring 1984 bur- rows was significantly greater than the average Table 2.— Percentage of overwinter survivors of and burrow diameters of two groups of G. turricola spi- derlings. July 1983 group includes spiderlings that es- tablished burrows during July 1983, August 1983 group includes spiderlings that established burrows between August and October 1983 (see text). Group Initial burrow size % over- winter First winter, 1983 July 1983 group (TV = 44) 4.2(1.03) 31.6 August 1983 group (TV = 95) 7.1 (1.78) 68.4 Second winter, 1984 July 1983 group (TV= 5) 4.1 (0.98) 23.8 August 1983 group (TV= 16) 7.4(1.64) 76.2 for September of the previous year (l^ = 5.5 1, = 139, F < 0.01; we obtained no burrow di- ameter estimates for October of 1983). All of these overwinter survivors remained active into April at which time 136 new burrows were dis- covered. The average burrow diameter of these new burrows (X = 7.9 mm, SD = 2.93) was not significantly different than that of the 139 over- winter survivors {X = 8.7 mm, t = 0.80, df = 273, P > 0.05). The percentage of spiderlings that survived through the spring and summer of 1984 was high {X = 85.1%; 100.0% March to April, 75.3% April to May, 71.9% May to June, 93.3% June to July). In the late summer of that year a large percentage of the burrows disap- peared. A substantial number of these burrows reappeared as active burrows in the spring of 1985 (35.9%; Table 1). During 1984 the average burrow diameter increased from 8.2 mm to around 20 mm (Table 1). Of the 50 burrows that survived through the winter of 1984-1985, only five of those were recorded active during August of that year. One of those burrows is known to have contained an adult spider with young dur- ing the spring of 1985. The average number of spiderlings taken from cage walls (TV = 6 cages) during each month of the 1983 caging experiment were: X = 7.5, SD = 16.3, July; X = 7.6, SD = 23.4, August; X = 3.0, SD =12.0, September; X = 0.8, SD = 0.9, October. Thus, 80% of the spiderlings found on cage walls were found there during July and Au- gust. Unaltered (control) plots contained a higher 52 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY percentage of new burrows than any of the 3 treatment plots (control 40.5%, open 16.2%, lit- ter removed 10.8%, litter added 32.4%.) Burrow disappearance was higher in the treatment areas (control 12.0%, open 26.3%, litter removed 14.0%, litter added 18.0%). DISCUSSION Although G. turricola was originally thought to have a one-year life cycle (Wallace 1942), our observations (Miller & Miller 1987) indicated that the species has a two-year cycle with a single reproductive period during the second year. This is similar to that reported for other Geolycosa (e.g., G. fatifera (Hentz), G. missouriensis ChdLm- berlin, and G. pikei (Marx); Wallace 1942). Ma- ture males appear only in late August and Sep- tember prior to the final molt of the female. These males may cohabitat with the immature female for a short time prior to her last molt (Miller & Miller 1986) at which time courtship and cop- ulation occur. Once mated, females cover the entrance to their burrow, overwinter there and produce egg cases in the spring (Miller & Miller 1986). Males die after mating in the fall. The young reach reproductive age during the fall of their second year. In our study population, the spiders that survived the winter of 1983-1984 were, thus, of the same cohort rather than prog- eny of early and late breeding adults of the same year. As we discuss below, the differences in the diameter of initial burrows and the timing of the establishment of these burrows are probably the result of variation in behavior related to the de- parture from the maternal burrow or the process of burrow establishment itself. Although the importance of the burrow during all of the life stages of Geolycosa is widely ac- cepted, there is still considerable uncertainty about the timing of initial burrow establishment, the factors that affect the positioning of the bur- row and the extent to which spiders change bur- row locations during their lifetime. With respect to the establishment of the first burrow, the ques- tion remains as to whether spiderlings build bur- rows immediately following dispersal or whether there is a delay between dispersal and burrow establishment during which time spiderlings use natural retreats. McQueen (1978) intimates that construction of first burrows in G. domifex Han- cock coincided with dispersal although little data for this conclusion is given. Conley (1985) has suggested that spiderlings of the western species G. rafaelana (Chamberlin) overwinter in natural retreats and build their first burrows in the spring. However, our observations of several hundred marked burrows of that species in Utah showed that new burrows are constructed in the early fall (Miller & Miller unpublished data). The results presented here for G. turricola suggest that both situations may exist in a single population of this species. The onset of burrow construction co- incides with the time at which the most spider- lings were found on the walls of cages providing evidence that some spiderlings construct bur- rows immediately following dispersal from their mother’s burrow. However, the census data show that this pattern may not hold for all dispersing spiderlings. A large number ( 1 36) of new burrows appeared in the early spring of 1984. It is likely that these are spiderlings that hatched in 1983, overwintered either in their mother’s burrow or in a retreat, and then constructed their first bur- row in the spring (the strategy suggested by Con- ley 1985). This is supported by the observation that no young were hatched in the study popu- lation in spring 1984, and the average diameter of the spring 1984 burrows was nearly the same as that of previously marked burrows that sur- vived the winter of 1983 (Table 1). Moreover, the Selma Chalk soil inhabited by this population is usually dry and replete with small cracks dur- ing the dispersal period. These soil cracks could provide temporary retreats for dispersing spi- derlings (Miller 1984a). A number of researchers have shown that bur- row density is not an important factor influenc- ing the survival of Geolycosa spiders (e.g., McQueen 1983; Conley 1985). However, the im- portance of the position of the burrow with re- spect to physical features of the habitat and, thus, possibly to critical resources, may be important. McQueen (1983) observed that the burrows of G. domifex were usually placed in unshaded open areas. One of us (Miller 1984a) addressed the issue of habitat preference in a series of labora- tory studies with G. micanopy Wallace and G. turricola. In those studies it was shown that the tendency to establish a burrow was related to the presence of vegetation and the feeding experience of the spiderling. The study also showed that these factors differed between species. The results of the present study, though limited, corroborate Miller’s (1984a) study by indicating that in G. turricola burrow sites in grassy areas and grassy areas with considerable litter are favored over open, uncovered positions. The mortality of the spiderlings that established burrows in vegetated MILLER & MIUJEK-GEOLYCOSA POPULATION DYNAMICS 53 areas was somewhat reduced although the study is too limited for a strong conclusion in that re- gard. There is considerable uncertainty about whether Geolycosa spiders change burrow loca- tions during their lifetime. It is generally thought that such changes are uncommon (e.g., Wallace 1942; Conley 1985). Our observations of over 500 marked burrows in Mississippi (G. turricola; this study) and southern Utah {G. mfaelana) tend to support this (Miller & Miller unpublished data). The month-to-month decrease in the number of previously active burrows is much smaller than the number of newly discovered burrows. Thus, it is unlikely that those burrows marked as newly discovered are actually spiders that have moved burrow location. Nevertheless, it is possible (per- haps likely) that some threshold of site tenacity exists for most habitats. Indeed, McQueen (1978) suggested that many individuals of the species G. domifex change burrow locations during the early spring. The results of the present study do not conclusively rule out burrow position changes in this species, but they do suggest that such ac- tivity is uncommon in the population that we studied. The early survival of burrowing wolf spiders is thought to be extremely low (Humphreys 1976; McQueen 1978, 1983). Humphreys (1976) ob- served that over three-quarters of the spiderlings of G. godeffroyi (L. Koch) in the two smallest size classes died. McQueen found that nearly all (90%) of the young of the year of a population of G. domifex in Canada died within several months of hatching. Estimates of adult survi- vorship suggest that fewer than 10% survive to reproductive age (usually two to three years) (McQueen 1 983). The results presented here cor- roborate the observation of low survival to re- productive age but suggest that high spiderling mortality may not be the rule among the species in this genus. First winter survivorship in our population was considerably higher than that of populations of other species of Geolycosa (e.g., McQueen 1 983). Nearly all of the first-year burrows marked as active in 1983 remained active the following spring. Further, the survivorship through the summer of 1 984 appears to be high. The decrease in the number of active burrows in the fall of that year is primarily the result of ( 1 ) the mor- tality of adult males that have left their burrows to mate (and subsequently to die; see below), and (2) burrow covering by mated females. The reason for the high spiderling survival in this population over the first winter is uncertain. The factors influencing mortality of dispersing Geolycosa spiderlings are unknown but are likely to include predation, failure to find a suitable burrow site, or parasitism. Mortality factors re- lated to the density of burrows are probably not important (McQueen 1983; Conley 1985). A possible explanation is related to their dispersal strategy. A portion of the broods of G. turricola remain in the maternal burrow well beyond the time when successful dispersal is possible where- as other brood members disperse shortly after hatching (Miller 1989). Humphreys (1983) re- ported the existence of a phasic dispersal pattern in the European tarantula Lycosa tarantula (L.). He suggested that such a mixed dispersal strategy might be an advantage in temporally varying en- vironments. Miller (1989) hypothesized that spi- derlings in these subsocial groups have a higher chance of surviving the first winter because they build deeper burrows than spiderlings that dis- perse shortly after emergence from the egg case. The relationship between burrow depth and sur- vival was first recognized by Humphreys (1973, 1978). Although the results presented here do not establish a direct link between subsociality and the timing of burrow construction, they lend support to that hypothesis. Spiderlings con- structing burrows in August made larger burrows and enjoyed a higher overwinter survival rate than those constructing burrows in July. It should be noted that if the spiderlings dis- covered in August are participants in a subsocial group, the timing of their dispersal is earlier than that predicted from Miller’s (1989) laboratory studies. This suggests that the extent to which extended tolerance among Geolycosa brood mates exists may be mediated by environmental con- ditions. Clearly, studies of the spatial, temporal and taxonomic variation in subsocial organiza- tion in this genus are needed to delimit the nature and strength of these environmental constraints. In terms of the total number of active burrows observed during the study, the survivorship over the second winter appears low. Of the 1983 group only 50 survived the winter of 1984-1985 and were recorded active in the spring of 1985, and only five of those (1.7% of 1983 active burrows) were observed to be active beyond March of that year. However, when viewed in terms of the spe- cies’ life cycle, second winter survivorship is high. If it is assumed that there is no sex-related mor- tality then approximately one-half of the 1 39 spi- 54 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY ders that were active in July of 1 984 were males. As discussed above, these males would mature, mate and die prior to the winter of 1984-1985. The remaining spiders that survive would be- come mature females and remain in their bur- rows during the winter of 1984-1985 to produce young the following spring. Thus, the fifty sur- vivors of the winter of 1984-1985 represent a majority of the spiders that would have had a chance to survive that winter. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We appreciate the comments of B. Main, J. Weaver, T. Forrest and G. Stratton on early drafts of this paper. We thank G. Baker, M. LaSalle, C. Ware, J. Jenkins, and T. Furst for their help in the field during portions of this study. LITERATURE CITED Conley, M. R. 1985. Predation versus resource lim- itation in survival of adult burrowing wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Oecologia (Berlin), 67:71-75. Harper, L. 1857. Preliminary report on the geology and agriculture of the state of Mississippi. E. Barks- dale Publishers, Jackson, MS. Humphreys, W. F. 1973. The environment, biology and energetics of the wolf spider Lycosa godeffroyi (L. Koch 1865). Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University, Canberra. Humphreys, W. F. 1976. The population dynamics of an Australian wolf spider, Geolycosa godeffroyi (L. Koch 1865) (Araneae: Lycosidae). J. Anim. Ecol., 45:59-80. Humphreys, W. F. 1978. Thermal biology of Geo- lycosa godeffroyi and other burrow inhabiting Ly- cosidae (Araneae) in Australia. Oecologia (Berk), 3 1 : 319-347. Humphreys, W. F. 1983. Temporally diphasic dis- persal in siblings of a wolf spider: a game of Russian roulette? Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc., 5:124-126. McQueen, D. J. 1978. Field studies of growth, re- production, and mortality in the burrowing wolf spider Geolycosa domifex (Hancock). Can. J. Zook, 56:2037-2049. McQueen, D. J. 1983. Mortality patterns for a pop- ulation of burrowing wolf spiders, Geolycosa dom- ifex (Hancock), living in southern Ontario. Can. J. Zook, 61:2758-2767. McQueen, D. J. & B. M. Culik. 1981. Field and lab- oratory activity patterns in the burrowing wolf spi- der Geolycosa domifex (Hancock). Can. J. Zook, 59: 1263-1271. Miller, G. L. 1984a. The influence of microhabitat and prey availability on burrow establishment of young Geolycosa turricola (Treat) and G. micanopy Wallace (Araneae: Lycosidae): A laboratory study. Psyche, 91:123-132. Miller, G. L. 1984b. Ballooning in Geolycosa turri- cola (Treat) and Geolycosa patellonigra Wallace: high dispersal frequencies in stable habitats. Can. J. Zook, 62:2110-2111. Miller, G. L. 1989. Subsocial organization and be- havior in broods of the obligate burrowing wolf spi- der Geolycosa turricola (Treat). Can. J. Zook, 67: 819-824. Miller, G. L. & P. R. Miller. 1984. Correlations of burrow characteristics and body size in burrowing wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Fla. Entomok, 67:314-317. Miller, G. L. & P. R. Miller. 1986. Pre-courtship cohabitation of mature male and penultimate fe- male Geolycosa turricola (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol., 14:133-134. Miller, G. L. & P. R. Miller. 1987. Life cycle and courtship behavior of the burrowing wolf spider Geolycosa turricola (Treat)( Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol., 15:385-394. Wallace, H. K. 1942. A revision of the burrowing spiders of the genus Geolycosa (Araneae, Lycosidae). Amer. Midland Natur., 27:1-61. Manuscript received May 1 990, revised September 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:55-61 A REVISION OF THE GENUS ZORA (ARANEAE, ZORIDAE) IN NORTH AMERICA David T. Corey and Daniel J. Mott*: Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois Uni- versity, Carbondale, Illinois 62901 USA Abstract. The genus Zora C.L. Koch, 1 848 in North America includes two species: Zora pumila (Hentz) and Zora hespera new species. Diagnoses, descriptions, distributions, and natural history notes are presented. The genus Zora consists of small to medium entelegyne, ecribellate spiders. They may be rec- ognized by having two claws with claw tufts, dis- tinct longitudinal bands on the cephalothorax, 4-2-2 arrangement of the eyes and a series of long overlapping spines on the first two tibiae and metatarsi. The color pattern on the abdomen is distinct and, in unfaded specimens, may be useful in distinguishing the species. The 17 species in the genus have a Holarctic distribution with most of the species reported from Europe and the Middle East. One species is cited from the United States. Neither the genus nor the family has been revised. Zora has been placed in the Lycosidae (Dahl &Dahl 1927), the Ctenidae(Petrunkevitch 1928; Homann 1947), the Clubionidae (Kaston 1948) and the Zoridae (Dahl 1912; Tullgren 1945; Leh- tinen 1967; Kaston 198 1). Currently several oth- er genera, whose relationships are debatable, are also placed in the Zoridae. METHODS Specimens were examined and measured un- der a stereo dissecting microscope with an ocular micrometer mounted in one eyepiece. Microm- eter units were converted to metric units and these rounded to the nearest 0.01 mm. Drawings were made with the aid of a squared-grid reticle in one eyepiece of the dissecting microscope. A total of 172 specimens was examined. Epigyna were removed and cleared in clove oil. Abbreviations for eyes: are as follows: AME (anterior median eye), ALE (anterior lateral eye), PME (posterior median eye), PLE (posterior lat- ' Present address: Department of Mathematics and Sci- ences, Dickinson State University, Dickinson, North Dakota 58601 USA. eral eye), MOQ (median ocular quadrangle). Di- mensions are given in the form: range, mean {X) and standard error (SE). Abbreviations for collections cited in text are: AMNH = American Museum of Natural His- tory, CAS = California Academy of Sciences, MCZ = Museum of Comparative Zoology, USNM = United States National Museum, SIUC = Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, JAB = Joseph A. Beatty. Genus Zora C. L. Koch, 1 848 Lycaena Sundevall, 1832:265. Type species by mono- typy, L. spinimana Sundevall. Preoccupied. Hecaerge Blackwall, 1833:193. Type species Lycaena spinimana (Sundevall). Preoccupied. Lycodia (lapsus ?) Sundevall, 1833:22. Dolomedes Walckenaer, 1837:348. (part) (3e race: Ru- piariae). Zora C. L. Koch, 1848:91. Type species Lycaena spi- nimana Sundevall. Psilothra Gistel, 1848: IX. Proposed replacement for Hecaerge, preoccupied. Katadysas Hentz, 1850:287. Type species by mono- typy K. pumilus Hentz. Thorell, 1869:43. Emendation of Ka?ac(y5a5 Hentz. Diagnosis.— Zora can be distinguished from most other eight-eyed spiders by the nearly straight anterior eye row, and the strongly re- curved posterior eye row, the eyes forming three rows. They have 2 claws with claw tufts. The presence of 6-8 pairs of long, overlapping spines on tibiae I and II separate them from the Cten- idae and Lycosidae. Description.— Small spiders with a general or- ange-brown color. A wide band extending back from each posterior lateral eye (Figs. 5, 1 1). A marginal band on each side of the cephalothorax. Carapace highest in the region of thoracic groove. 56 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures. \-l. — Z. pumila: 1, 2, male palpus; 1, retrolateral aspect; 2, ventral aspect; 3-7, female; 3, tibia and metatarsus leg I; 4, chelicerae; 5, dorsal view of female; 6, 7, epigynum; 6, dorsal aspect, cleared; 7, ventral aspect. COREY & MOTT-REVISION OF AMERICAN ZORA 57 Sternum with a dark spot near each coxa (Fig. 10). Labium wider than long. The legs heavily spotted, leg IV longest, followed by I, II, III. Tarsi with 2 claws and tufts. Tibiae I and II with 6-8 pairs of long, overlapping ventral spines. Meta- tarsi I and II with 2-3 pairs of long, overlapping ventral spines. Palpal tarsus of females and ju- veniles with a pair of ventral spines. Retromargin of chelicerae usually with two teeth, promargin usually with 3 teeth. Apical segment of the pos- terior spinnerets short and indistinct. Distribution. — Holarctic. Specimens have been reported from Mexico and Brazil by Marx ( 1890) under the nomina nuda Zora californica and Z. latithorax. The localities are likely to be in error. Zora pumila (Hentz) Figs. 1-7. Map 1 Katadysas pumilus Hentz, 1850:287, plate X, fig. 16, 1 male imm. Type destroyed. Catadysas pumilus Thorell, 1869:43. Zora pumila Wolmherg, 1882:156. Z. spinimana Emerton, 191 1:403, plate V, figs. 5a-5b, 1 female. Not Z. spinimana (Sund.) Z. pumilus Comstock, 1912:403, fig. 651; 1940:587. fig. 651. Diagnosis.— Males of Z. pumila are distin- guished from males of Z. hespera by the larger palp, and the angular conductor (Fig. 2). Females have sperm ducts coiled anterior to the sper- mathecae (Fig. 6). Zora pumila has been con- fused with the European Zora spinimana (Sund.). Examination of specimens of Z. spinimana showed that they are distinct. The tibial apoph- ysis of the male palp of Z. spinimana and Z. nemoralis (Blackwall) has a broad base and is bent distally. The distal end of tibial apophysis in Z. spinimana is bifurcate and in Z. nemoralis it is truncate. In female Z. spinimana the recep- tacles are closer together than in Z. pumila and Z. hespera and the sperm ducts turn forward and parallel with the long axis of the body at their anterior end. The course of ducts in Z. nemoralis is different from Z. pumila and Z. hespera. Description.— A wide marginal band on each side of cephalothorax, wide paramedial band ex- tending back from each posterior median eye and a thin Y-shaped mark on abdomen. Legs heavily spotted. Chelicerae as in Fig. 4. Males: Measurements of 10 specimens (mm). Total length 3.54-4.10 (3.74, 0.06). Carapace length 1.69-1.95 (1.81, 0.03), width 1.25-1.54 (1.40, 0.03). Eye sizes and interdistances AME 0.08, ALE 0.08, PME 0.10, PLE 0.10; AME- AME 0.08, AME-ALE 0.08, PME-PME 0.10, PME-PLE 0.13, ALE-PLE 0.16; MOQ length 0.23-0.31 (0.28, 0.01), front width 0.23-0.28 (0.24, 0.01), back width 0.15-0.31 (0.28, 0.02). Clypeus height 0.05-0.10 (0.09, 0.01). Chelicera length 0.31-0.54 (0.46, 0.03), width 0.23-0.33 (0.27, 0.01). Total lengths of legs; I: 5.28-6.51 (5.74, 0.12), II: 4.92-6.05 (5.45, 0.12), III: 4.21- 5.92(5.14, 0.15), IV: 5.38-8.31 (7.39,0.27). To- tal length of palp 1.36-1.95 (1.79, 0.06). Leg spi- nation; tibiae I and II with 6-7 pairs of long, overlapping ventral spines, metatarsi I and II with 2 pairs of long, overlapping ventral spines. Females: Measurements of 1 0 specimens (mm). Total length 4.00-6.00 (4.78, 0.22). Carapace length 1.29-2.31 (1.94, 0.10), width 1.10-1.80 (1.49,0.11). Eye sizes and interdistances AME 0.08, ALE 0.08, PME 0.10, PLE 0.10; AME- AME 0.08, AME-ALE 0.10, PME-PME 0.13, PME-PLE 0.15, ALE-PLE 0.16; MOQ length 0.26-0.35 (0.30, 0.01), front width 0.24-0.31 (0.27, 0.01), back width 0.28-0.37 (0.33, 0.01). Clypeus height 0.05-0.13 (0.10, 0.01). Chelicera length 0.30-0.77 (0.57, 0.04), width 0.26-0.33 (0.30, 0.01). Total length of legs; I: 5.59-6.90 (6.20, 0.15), II: 5.08-6.62 (5.89, 0.19), III: 4.49- 6.08 (5.41, 0.15), IV: 5.46-9.10 (8.02, 0.36). Total length of palp 1.62-3.31 (2.25, 0.17). Leg spi- nation; tibiae I and II with 8 pairs of long, over- lapping ventral spines, metatarsi I and II with 3 pairs of long, overlapping ventral spines. Distribution.— Eastern United States from Massachusetts south to Florida, and west to Mis- souri and Texas. Natural history.— This spider hunts in tall grass and bushes during daylight. The egg sac is guarded by the female, but no protective retreat is built (Kaston 1981). Females have been taken from January through October, and males from April through July. Immatures can be found year round. Specimens have been collected in pitfall traps from a pond pine community in central Florida (Corey & Taylor 1 988) and from a brushy prairie in Johnson Co., Missouri. In North Carolina they have been collected in broomsedge and young pine litter with a Berlese funnel. A juvenile was found in foam skimmed from Indian Creek, Jackson Co., Illinois. Material examined. — USA: Alabama; Lee Co., Auburn (N. Banks), immature (MCZ); Madison Co., Monte Sano, December 1 940 (A. F. Archer), 58 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Map 1.— Distribution of Zom in North America. immature (AMNH). Connecticut; Middlesex Co., Killingworth, 23 June 1935 (B. J. Kaston), 3 fe- males, immature (USNM); New Haven Co., vi- cinity of Norwalk, 2 July 1933 (W. Ivie), female, immature (AMNH), Norwalk, August 1933 (W. Gertsch), female (AMNH), Seymour, 30 May 1 965 (J. & W. Ivie), female, 2 immature (AMNH). Florida; Orange Co., Univ. of Central Florida Campus, May 1983 (D. T. Corey), female (USNM). Georgia; Emanuel Co., N of Swains- boro, 23 December 1952 (W. Ivie), immature (AMNH). Illinois; Jackson Co., R1 W, TIOS, S25, NW 1/4, 21 March 1975 (R. Parkin), immature (SIUC). Massachusetts; Middlesex Co., Hollis- ton, 5 May and 1 July 1923 (J. H. Emerton), 2 females, 2 immatures (MCZ), August 1928, fe- male (MCZ), 9 September 1928 (N. Banks), im- mature (MCZ), 15 September 1928 (N. Banks), female (MCZ), 16 June 1929 (N. Banks), female, 3 immature (MCZ), Tyngsboro, 1 6 October 1 908 (J. H. Emerton), female (MCZ), 23 January 1910 (J. H. Emerton), female, immature (MCZ). Mis- souri; Johnson Co., Knob Noster State Park, 1 5- 22 May 1978 (Peck), female (CAS), 16-26 May 1978 (Peck), immature (CAS), 11-16 April 1979 (PECK), 3 immatures (CAS); Phelps Co., Rolla, Dry Fork Cr., 8-11 May 1951 (HEF, DLF), fe- male (CAS); St. Louis, St. Louis Co., 13 May 1950 (W. Dowdy), immature (AMNH). New Jer- sey; Atlantic Co., Great Egg Harbour River be- tween Penny Pot and Weymouth, 3 May 1947 (H. Van Deusen), female (AMNH); Bergen Co., Ramsey, 23 June 1934 (W. J. Gertsch), female, immature (AMNH), 5 June 1938 (B. J. Kaston), 4 females, 3 males, 2 immature (USNM), 5 July 1938 (W. Gertsch), male and female pieces (AMNH); Hunterdon Co., Lambertville, May 1952 (W. Ivie), male (AMNH), June 1953 (W. Ivie), immature (AMNH). North Carolina; Dur- ham Co., Duke forest, Durham, 1 1-28 April 1935 (A. M. Chickering), male (MCZ), SE comer of Co. road 1116 and Chapel Hill Blvd. junction, I October 1963 (J. W. Berry), immature (JAB), II November 1963 (J. W. Berry), immature (JAB), 1 May 1964 (J. W. Berry), male (JAB), 3 June 1964 (J. W. Berry), female (JAB). Ohio; Harrison Co., Hopedale, 17 May 1979 (R. Ur- banek), male (JAB). Pennsylvania; Bucks Co., E of Jamison, Horseshoe Bend of Neshaminy Cr., November (W. Ivie), 2 immature (AMNH), Au- Figures. 8-14.— Z. hespera: 8, 9, male palpus; 8, retrolateral aspect; 9, ventral aspect; 10-14, female; 10, sternum; 11, dorsal view of female; 12, chelicerae; 13, 14, epigynum; 13, dorsal aspect, cleared; 14, ventral aspect. 60 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY gust 1953 (W. Ivie), 5 females, 19 immatures (AMNH), September 1953 (W. Ivie), female, 9 immatures (AMNH), October 1953 (W. Ivie), female (AMNH), April 1954 (W. Ivie), 2 im- matures (AMNH), May 1954 (W. Ivie), 4 fe- males, 7 males (AMNH), June 1955 (W. Ivie), 1 1 females (CAS). Tennessee; Knox Co., 29 Jan- uary 1982 (G. Tolbert), immature (CAS). Texas; Anderson Co., 7 mi. E of Palestine, 17 July 1938 (Davis), 3 immature (AMNH); Fayette Co., 1 1 mi. N of La Grange, 18 July 1966 (J. & W. Ivie), female (AMNH). Zora hespera, new species Figs. 8-14, Map 1 Types. — Female holotype from east of Pollock Pines, El Dorado Co., California, in a pine forest, 25 June 1953 collected by V. Roth. In American Museum of Natural History. Etymology.— Name is derived from the Latin word for west. Diagnosis.— Males and females can be distin- guished from Z. purnila by the genitalia (Figs. 1 , 2, 6, 9, 13, 14). Conductor of male rounded an- teriorly. Sperm ducts in female S-shaped. See Z. purnila for differences between Z. hespera and Z. spinimana and Z. nemoralis. Description. — Narrow marginal band on each side of the cephalothorax. Wide paramedial band extends back from each posterior median eye. Wide, lateral, longitudinal light colored bands on the abdomen. Chelicerae as in Fig. 12. Males: Measurements of 3 specimens (mm). Total length 2.80-3.14 (2.95, 0.12). Carapace length 1.40-1.62 (1.27, 0.08), width 1.24-1.32 (1.27, 0.03). Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.06, ALE 0.06, PME 0.06, PLE 0.08; AME- AME 0.05, AME-ALE 0.04, PME-PME 0.08, PME-PLE 0.11, ALE-PLE 0.16. MOQ length 0.14-0.26 (0.22, 0.05), front width 0.16-0.18 (0. 1 7, 0.0 1), back width 0.24. Clypeus height 0.06. Chelicera length 0.36-0.42 (0.38, 0.02), width 0.20-0.22 (0.21, 0.00). Total lengths of legs; I: 4.00-4.98 (4.49, 0.69), II: 3.80-4.72 (4.26, 0.65), III: 4.58 {N= 1), IV: 5.32-5.98 (5.65, 0.46). Total length of palp 1.64-1.74 (1.68, 0.04). Leg spi- nation tibiae I and II with 6-7 pairs of long, overlapping ventral spines, metatarsi I and II with 2 pairs of long, overlapping ventral spines. Females; Measurements of 1 0 specimens (mm). Total length 3.54-6.79 (4.77, 0.37). Carapace length 1.53-2.13 (1.88, 0.07), width 1.23-1.72 (1.51, 0.05). Eye sizes and interdistances AME 0.08, ALE 0.08, PME 0.10, PLE 0.10; AME- AME 0.05, AME-ALE 0.08, PME-PME 0.10, PME-PLE 0.13, ALE-PLE 0.18. MOQ length 0.28-0.36 (0.31, 0.01), front width 0.18-0.26 (0.23, 0.01), back width 0.28-0.36 (0.31, 0.01). Clypeus height 0.08-0.13 (0.10, 0.01). Chelicera length 0.44-0.67 (0.56, 0.02), width 0.20-0.42 (0.30, 0.02). Total lengths of legs; I: 4.03-6.28 (5.21, 0.22), II: 4.56-5.82 (4.97, 0.15), III: 3.97- 5.69 (4.58, 0.17), IV: 5.36-7.36 (6.48, 0.17). To- tal length of palp 1.56-2.17 (1.89, 0.08). Leg spi- nation, tibiae I and II with 6-7 pairs of long, overlapping ventral spines, metatarsi I and II with 2 pairs of long, overlapping ventral spines. Distribution. — Washington, Oregon, Califor- nia, Idaho, and Arizona. Natural history.— Zora hespera has been col- lected throughout the year: adult males taken in April, May, and June, females from February through December. They have been found by sifting through oak leaves or by using a Berlese funnel. Material examined. — All adults are paratypes. USA: Arizona; Yavapai Co., 5 mi. S of Prescott, 23 April 1936 (Bishop), 2 immature (AMNH). California; El Dorado Co., Riverton, 1 5 July 1934 (W. Ivie), female (AMNH), E Pollock Pines, 25 June 1953 (V. Roth), female (AMNH); Los An- geles Co., Tanbark Flats, San Gabriel Mts., 20 June 1952 (M. Cazier, W. Gertsch, R. Schram- mel), female (AMNH); Mariposa Co., Wawona Camp, Yosemite Park, 17 September 1941 (W. Ivie), 3 females, 2 immatures (AMNH); Napa Co., Monticello Dam, 23 October 1957 (R. O. Schuster), immature (AMNH), Toll road on Mount St. Helena, 31 December 1953 (G. A. Marsh, R. O. Schuster, V. Roth), female, 2 im- matures (AMNH); Orange Co., Santa Ana Mts., 13 September 1941 (W. Ivie), 3 immatures (AMNH); Riverside Co., Idyllwild, San Jacinto Mts., 18 June 1952 (W. J. Gertsch, M. Cazier, R. Schrammel), immature (AMNH), 17 March 1957 (1. Newell), female (AMNH); San Bema- dino Co., 1.6 mi. E of Seven Oaks, 23 March 1958 (1. Newell), female (AMNH), Arrowhead Lake, 6 May 1936 (Bishop), immature (AMNH); San Diego Co., 4.8 mi. S of Julian, 26 April 1959 (1. Newell), female (AMNH), Sweetwater River, 1 1/2 mi. N of Descanso, 26 March 1967 (E. & R. Musillo & J. Ivie), female (AMNH); San Ma- teo Co., S of Woodside, 17 September 1964 (J. & W. Ivie), female (AMNH); Sonoma Co., 3 mi. W of Glen Ellen, 31 December 1953 (Marsh, Schuster, Roth), immature (AMNH), 15 Feb- ruary 1954 (Roth, Schuster), female, immature COREY & MOTT- REVISION OF AMERICAN ZORA 61 (AMNH), Sugarloaf Ridge State Park, Bald Mt. Trail (450m), 20 November 1982 (V. F. Lee), immature (CAS); Yolo Co., 5.4 mi. SW of Win- ters, 29 May 1939 (FCR, LMS, ROS), immature (AMNH), 23 April 1959 (F. C. Ramey), 2 fe- males (AMNH). Idaho; Adams Co., 7 mi. NE of Council, 17 October 1944 (W. Ivie), 3 immature (AMNH); Idaho Co., Clearwater Creek near Kooskia, 23 August 1940 (W. Ivie), female, im- mature (AMNH). Oregon; Benton Co., W of Cor- vallis, 20 March 1937 (JCC), female (AMNH); Columbia Co., Goble, 22 March 1938, female (AMNH), 23 April 1938, female, male, imma- ture (AMNH); Coos Co., Charleston, 17 June 1952 (B. Malkin), male (AMNH); Josephine Co., Grave Cr., 30 May 1952 (V. Roth), female (AMNH); Lane Co., 8 mi. S of Divide Guard Sta., 27 July 1955 (V. Roth), female (AMNH); Marion Co., St. Benedict, 2 May 1954 (J. Roth), male (AMNH); Yamhill Co., Pea vine Ridge, near McMinnville, November- December 1946 (K. M. Fender), female, 7 immatures (AMNH). Wash- ington; Yakima Co., Tieton River, about 10 mi. E of Rimrock, 1 3 September 1965 (J. & W. Ivie), immature (AMNH). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank J. Reiskind for suggesting this genus as a subject for revision. We are indebted to J. A. Beatty for his advice on many problems as they arose. We thank J. Wunderlich for sending specimens of Zora spinimana. H. Levi and J. A. Beatty made critical comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. The following people kindly lent specimens for this revision: J. Coddington, Smithsonian, US National Museum; J. A. Beat- ty, Southern Illinois University; H. Levi, Mu- seum of Comparative Zoology; N. 1. Platnick and W. J. Gertsch, American Museum of Natural History; and W. J. Pulawski, California Acade- my of Sciences. LITERATURE CITED Blackwall, J. 1833. Characters of some undescribed genera and species of Araneidae. Lond. Phil. Mag. J. Sci., 3:187-197. Comstock, J. H. 1912. The Spider Book. Garden City, New York. Comstock, J. H. 1940. The Spider Book. Revised and edited by W. J. Gertsch. New York. Corey, D. T. & W. K. Taylor. 1988. Ground surface spiders in three central Florida plant communities. J. Arachnol., 16:213-221. Dahl, F. 1912. Arachnoidea. /« Handwort. Naturw., 1:485-514. Dahl, F. & M. Dahl. 1927. Spinnentiere oder Arach- noidea. II. Lycosidae s. lat. (Wolfspinnen im wei- teren sinne). Tierw. Deuts., 5:1-80. Emerton, J. H. 1911. New spiders from New En- gland. Trans. Connecticut Acad. Arts Sci., 16:385- 407. Gistel, J. 1848. Naturgeschichte des Tierreichs fur hohere Schulen. Stuttgart. Hentz, N. M. 1850. Descriptions and figures of the Araneides of the United States. Boston J. Nat. Hist., 6:271-295. Holmberg, E. L. 1882. Observations a propos du sous-ordre des Araignees territelaires, specialement du genre nordamericain Catadysas Hentz et de la sous-famille Mecicobothrioidae. Bol. Acad. Arg., 4: 153-174. Homann, H. 1947. DieNebenaugenderSpinnen(Ar- anea). Ztschr. Naturforschg., 2b: 16 1-1 67. Kaston, B. J. 1948. Spiders of Connecticut. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Con- necticut. Bull. 70. Kaston, B. J. 1981. Spiders of Connecticut. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Con- necticut. Second edition. Bull. 70. Koch, C. L. 1848. Die Arachniden. Vierzehnter Band. Numberg, 210 pp. Lehtinen, P. 1 967. Classification of the cribellate spi- ders and some allied families, with notes on the evolution of the suborder Araneomorpha. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 4: 199-468. Marx, G. 1 890. Arachnida in Scientific results of ex- plorations by the U. S. Fish Commission steamer “Albatross”. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 12:207-21 1. Petrunkevitch, A. 1928. Systema Aranearum. Trans. Connecticut Acad. Arts Sci., 29:1-270. Sundevall, J . C. 1832. Svenska Spindlarmes beskrifn- ing. Fortsattning och slut. N. Act. Reg. Soc. Sci. Upsal., 171-272. Sundevall, J. C. 1833. Conspectus arachnidum. Lon- dini Eothorum. Thorell, T. 1869. On European spiders. N. Act. Reg. Soc. Sci. Upsal., 7:1-108. Tullgren, A. 1945. Svensk spindel fauna 3. Egentliga spindlar. Araneae Fam. 5-7, Clubionidae, Zoridae och Gnaphosidae. Stockholm. Walckenaer, C. A. 1837. Histoire naturelle des in- sects. Apteres. Paris. Tome 1. Walker, F. 1851. List of spiders captured by F. Walker. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 7:157-158. Manuscript received June 1990, revised September 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:62-66 OBSERVATIONS ON THE BEHAVIOR OF THE KLEPTOPARASITIC SPIDER, MYSMENOPSIS FURTIVA (ARANEAE, MYSMENIDAE) Frederick A. Coyle, Theresa C. O’Shields and Daniel G. Perlmutter: Department of Biology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina 28723 USA Abstract. Mysmenopsis furtiva, a tiny spider which lives in the funnelwebs of the Ja- maican diplurid spider, Ischnothele xera, behaves both as a kleptoparasite and as a com- mensal; it pilfers portions of its host’s prey and also captures and consumes minute insects which are trapped in the host web and unnoticed or ignored by the host. Mysmenopsis furtiva is able to ingest hemolymph from its host’s prey at a much faster rate than it can ingest material from the insects it captures. Two of its stealth strategies are to move not at all or slowly when the host is motionless and to synchronize its rapid movements with host movements. The host’s anti-kleptoparasite behaviors suggest that the kleptoparasite has a significant negative impact on the host. Kleptoparasitic spiders (those which regularly steal food from other species of spiders) are known to occur in five families (Vollrath 1987; Griswold & Meikle-Griswold 1987): 1) Theridiidae (Ar- gyrodes species), 2) Dictynidae (Archaeodictyna ulova Griswold and Griswold), 3) Salticidae {Portia and Simaetha species), 4) Symphytog- nathidae {Curimagua bayano Forster and Plat- nick), and 5) Mysmenidae. Three genera of mys- menids contain species that are definitely or very probably kleptoparasitic. Two of these, Isela and Kilifa, are recently described monotypic genera living in the funnelwebs of African diplurid spi- ders; Isela okuncana Griswold is a common kleptoparasite of Allot hele terretis Tucker (Gris- wold 1985), and Kilifia inquilina Baert and Mur- phy is a common inhabitant of Thelechoris kar- schi Bosenberg and Lenz webs (Baert & Murphy 1987). In the tropical American genus Mysme- nopsis (the sister group of Isela) three species {M. ischnamigo Platnick and Shadab, M. gamboa Platnick and Shadab, and M. dipluramigo Plat- nick and Shadab) regularly feed on the prey of their diplurid spider hosts (Vollrath 1987), one (M. archeri Platnick and Shadab) feeds on the prey of its pholcid hosts (Baptista 1988), two {M. capae Baert and M. cienga Muller) have been observed living in Cyrtophora webs (Baert 1 990), and seven others (M. palpalis (Kraus), M. cid- relicola (Simon), M. monticola Coyle and Meigs, M. furtiva Coyle and Meigs, M. hauscar Baert, M. pachacutec Baert, and M. tibialis (Bryant)) have been observed living in diplurid webs (Plat- nick & Shadab 1978; Coyle & Meigs 1989; Baert 1990; and Alayon pers. comm.). These obser- vations and the evidence for host-kleptoparasite cospeciation in the Jamaican species, M. mon- ticola and M. furtiva (Coyle & Meigs 1989), suggest that many of the 26 known Mysmenopsis species may be found to be obligate kleptopar- asites or at least highly dependent on a klepto- parasitic life style. Although Coyle and Meigs (1989) assumed that the sister species M. monticola and M. furtiva are kleptoparasites, no direct evidence of klep- toparasitism was available. In this paper we de- scribe observations on the interaction of M. fur- tiva with its host, Ischnothele xera Coyle and Meigs, observations which demonstrate conclu- sively that M. furtiva is a kleptoparasite. METHODS One adult female M. furtiva (body length ap- proximately 1.5 mm) was collected from an I. xera web on 20 May 1990 about 15 miles east of Kingston, Jamaica, very near the type locality for both species (Coyle & Meigs 1989, 1990). The kleptoparasite was then transported to our lab in Cullowhee, North Carolina, and released on 25 May into the web of a 14 mm long adult female I. xera collected at the same place and time. The host’s web was constructed between two vertical panes of glass (15 x 24 cm) sepa- rated by 1.5 cm thick strips of wood along the sides and bottoms of the panes. The kleptopar- asite and host were observed periodically during COYLE ET AL.- BEHAVIOR OF MYSMENOPSIS FURTIVA 63 daylight hours over the next five weeks, and 9.5 h of behavior were recorded with a Panasonic WV-D5000 video recorder with a Micro-Nikkor 55 mm close-up lens. Live prey, dropped into the host web to trigger prey capture and feeding bouts (iV = 8), included four mealworm beetle larvae (Tenebrio, 1 1-1 5 mm long), an adult house cricket {Acheta domestica, 16 mm long), three fruit flies {Drosophila, 2 mm long), and several booklice and collembolans (1-3 mm long). Es- timates of the increase in kleptoparasite abdom- inal volume during feeding were obtained by measuring the width and length of the abdomen on the video screen before and after feeding, con- verting these to real dimensions using carapace width as the reference scale, and then computing the abdominal volumes using the equation for an ellipsoid (prolate spheroid), which is similar to the shape of the abdomen. Increase in abdom- inal volume was then divided by feeding dura- tion to obtain an estimate of the rate of food intake. RESULTS The kleptoparasite spent much of the time mo- tionless in a small region of the host’s web in the upper half of the arena well away from (10-15 cm) the host’s normal resting position in the bot- tom of the arena. The kleptoparasite did not con- struct any obvious web, but it should be noted that we did not use methods appropriate for de- tecting very delicate silk constructs. When mov- ing about the host’s web (chiefly during periods of host foraging/feeding activity) the kleptopar- asite periodically attached its dragline. Feeding. —During all three phases of the host prey captures (approach, capture, and carry; Coyle & Ketner 1990) the kleptoparasite either re- mained motionless, moved slowly, or retreated a short distance away from the activity. Only after the host had returned with the prey to the vicinity of its retreat and had begun feeding did the kleptoparasite move toward the feeding site. Two of these approaches began 1 min after the host commenced feeding (one mealworm cap- ture and the cricket capture); the rest began 9- 25 min after. During two host feeding bouts (mealworm lar- va and cricket), the kleptoparasite climbed onto the prey while the host was feeding and moved slowly over the prey surface, touching it occa- sionally with pedipalps and mouthparts as if searching for digestible substrate (Fig. 1). On both occasions the kleptoparasite boarded the prey far from the host’s mouthparts; only once did the kleptoparasite approach close to the host’s mouthparts, but it made no attempt to feed there. We observed the kleptoparasite feeding on host prey three times. In the first instance, while the host fed on the neck of the cricket, the klepto- parasite fed on hemolymph seeping from the base of the cricket’s third leg, which we had removed before dropping the cricket into the web. During this feeding, which lasted 16.5 min, the volume of the kleptoparasite’ s abdomen more than dou- bled, increasing by approximately 0.72 mm\ for an intake rate of 0.044 ml/min. Three and a half hours later, while the host was feeding on the cricket’s body, the kleptoparasite fed very briefly on the neck region of the cricket’s head, which had been removed by the host. Several days later during another host feeding bout, the kleptopar- asite fed on fluid (presumably hemolymph) at the host-severed end of half a mealworm while the host fed on the other half nearby. This feeding lasted 10.1 min, not including two brief pauses near the end of the feeding bout, and doubled the kleptoparasite’s abdominal volume, increas- ing it by approximately 0.86 mm\ for an intake rate of 0.085 ml/min. Whenever the kleptopar- asite fed, its legs and pedipalps were motionless but its abdomen usually swayed slowly and slightly. We attempted to determine whether the klep- toparasite would capture small prey on its own. When we dropped three fruit flies onto the host web, the host captured all three within a few minutes and the kleptoparasite remained virtu- ally motionless. At another time we dropped some collembolans and booklice onto the web, the host captured and fed on the largest collembolan, and the kleptoparasite did not approach any of the insects. On another day we dropped a very small booklouse (about half the volume of the klep- toparasite) and two collembolans (a sminthurid and an entomobryid, each about one-third to half the volume of the kleptoparasite) onto the web. The host did not respond, but, after about 7 min, the kleptoparasite began to approach and even- tually captured (grabbed with its first legs and bit) and consumed the booklouse. During this 83 min feeding bout, the kleptoparasite’s abdo- men increased slightly in volume, by approxi- mately 0. 1 9 mm^ for an intake rate of 0.002 ml/ min. It then proceeded in a similar manner to capture and consume the two collembolans, feeding on the first for 80 min. Since these two feeding episodes were not video-recorded, it was 64 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 1.— Adult female Mysmenopsis furtiva searching for a feeding site on a Tenebrio larva, which is being consumed by an adult female Ischnothele xera. not possible to obtain abdominal volume in- crease estimates, but the increases appeared small. Occasionally the kleptoparasite repeatedly reached with its legs and gathered a few fine strands of silk to its mouthparts. Whether the spider was simply breaking strands to reduce a small region of the host web or actually digesting and ingesting web protein could not be deter- mined. Kleptoparasite movements.— The form and speed of kleptoparasite movement through the web depended markedly on the host’s behavior. When the host was not moving, kleptoparasite movements were typically slow, especially if the host was not feeding. During such slow move- ment, rarely did more than two or three legs move at a time, and forward progress, when it occurred, was only 0.2-0. 6 body lengths per sec- ond (mean = 0.41 ± 0.12, A^= 11). Slow move- ments typically involved rather slow waving and probing motions of the legs, particularly the an- terior pairs. Rapid kleptoparasite movements occurred only when the host was moving (am- bulatory and prey manipulation movements) and consisted of very short advances and/or rapid leg waving/probing as well as (less commonly) lon- ger advances. Forward progress was much faster during these advances than during slow advanc- es, ranging from 3.0-1 1.1 body lengths per sec- ond (mean = 5.44 ± 2.57, N = 7). During one bout of host feeding when both kleptoparasite and host behaviors were simul- taneously recorded, we tallied whether or not kleptoparasite movements occurred during host movements; every one of the 1 1 6 rapid (and many of the slow) kleptoparasite movement events oc- curred during host movement. The onset and cessation of most of these kleptoparasite move- ments coincided with the beginning and end of the host movements. On occasion, when the host was feeding, the kleptoparasite would make moderately fast movements ( 1 .0- 1 . 7 body lengths per second, 77 = 3) while the host was not mov- ing, but this usually (over 75% of the time) hap- pened when there was a large prey item or dense silk between the kleptoparasite and the host. COYLE ET AL.- BEHAVIOR OF MYSMENOPSIS FURTIVA 65 Host responses to the kleptoparasite.— While the host was feeding, we observed certain host behaviors that do not normally occur during feeding in a kleptoparasite-free web, and were therefore almost certainly anti-kleptoparasite be- haviors. Silk application: On 20 occasions the host interrupted feeding and applied silk to its web, usually in the region between the klepto- parasite and its feeding site (and/or unattended pieces of prey). Frequently, much silk was ap- plied (spinning duration = 7-113 s, mean = 25 ± 28.1, = 12). Scouting/challenging: On 13 occasions the host released its prey, dashed or walked quickly partway toward the kleptopar- asite (which was usually approaching the host’s feeding site or an unattended portion of prey), paused, and then returned to the feeding site. The non-persistent nature of this approach seems to distinguish it from a prey capture approach. Sometimes the kleptoparasite retreated in re- sponse to the host’s advance. Occasionally the host paused to apply silk during her return. Ag- itatedfeeding: When the kleptoparasite was mov- ing very close to or on the prey while the host was feeding, prey manipulation by the host usu- ally increased in frequency and intensity and was sometimes accompanied by brief rapid tapping of pedipalps on the prey or at the kleptoparasite. Sometimes the kleptoparasite retreated during these host behaviors. On a few occasions the host suddenly carried the prey to a new position, leav- ing the kleptoparasite behind. Web-biting: On five occasions the host turned toward the klep- toparasite, pulled part of the web toward its che- licerae with its pedipalps, and quickly extended and flexed its fangs into the silk in a biting move- ment. Chasing: Three times we observed the host chasing after the kleptoparasite, but every chase was short and quickly aborted. The riskiest such challenge for the kleptoparasite involved the host lunging and striking at the spot where the klep- toparasite had started its narrow escape, and then feeding on the piece of prey on which the klep- toparasite had been feeding. DISCUSSION Our observations show clearly that M. furtiva is a kleptoparasite which readily approaches and feeds upon prey captured by its host. Its feeding does not require assistance from host digestive enzymes, as evidenced by the kleptoparasite’s successful ingestion of hemolymph at the crick- et’s leg base, which had not been fed upon by the host, and by its capture and consumption of minute insects. Its stealthy behavior is also in- dicative of a spider specialized for kleptopara- sitism. Particularly noteworthy is its practice of moving quickly only when the host is moving, a stealth strategy also employed by Argyrodes ele- vatasT aczanowski (V ollrath 1979) and one which presumably takes advantage of the host’s prob- able inability to separate informative web vibra- tions from those it is generating. The possibility that we observed M. furtiva ingesting its host’s silk needs to be further explored; at least three Argyrodes species feed on host silk (V ollrath 1981, 1987; Whitehouse 1986). Our observations reveal that M. furtiva is also an opportunistic predator which can detect, cap- ture, and ingest tiny insects which are caught in the host’s web and are unnoticed or ignored by the host. The same capability has been observed in kleptoparasitic Mysmenopsis species (M. isch- namigo, M. gamboa, and M. dipluramigo) living in diplurid webs in Panama (Vollrath 1978, 1987). It would be interesting to know whether this kind of commensalistic activity is a common and/or crucial source of nutrition. Clearly, this kleptoparasite ingested much more material per unit of feeding time from host prey than from the tiny insects it captured. The ap- parent costs to M. furtiva of feeding as a klep- toparasite (especially the risk of being captured by the host) may be at least partly compensated by the advantages of feeding on hemolymph, i.e., rapid ingestion and low digestive costs. Not only can hemolymph be ingested without the time, energy, and material costs of external digestion, but many of its constituents are small molecules which can be digested inexpensively. A cost/ben- efit analysis of these alternate feeding strategies should also consider the nutritional value of the ingested food; since insect hemolymph is very similar to intracellular fluids and contains rela- tively high concentrations of amino acids, or- ganic phosphates, proteins, and carbohydrates (Rorkin & Jeuniaux 1974; Mullins 1985), it may be nearly as valuable nutritionally per volume as muscle and other tissues that are digested dur- ing the consumption of minute prey. Our observations suggest that Mysmenopsis kleptoparasites, in spite of their small size, may have an important negative impact upon their hosts. Food stealing, the interruption of host feeding, and the host’s (partly effective) anti- kleptoparasite efforts, some of which are also per- formed by the diplurid hosts of other Mysmenop- sis species (Vollrath 1978, 1979, 1984), must in- 66 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY crease the cost/benefit ratio of feeding for the host. Just the existence of such anti-klepto par- asite behaviors is indicative of a negative effect by the kleptoparasite. When several Mysmenop- sis adults and juveniles live together in one web (a common situation in webs of the diplurids Vollrath (1984) observed, adult female Ischno- thele reggae Coyle and Meigs (Coyle & Meigs 1989), and probably also I. xera), the collective cost to the host could be particularly important. We suspect that a key reason why diplurid webs are especially favorable for mysmenid klep- toparasites is their persistence in time and space. The first author’s field observations indicate that adult female diplurids commonly occupy the same web for one or more years. In addition, the fine dense mesh, large size, asymmetry, and three- dimensional nature of these webs, as well as the high ratio of host size/kleptoparasite size (Fig. 1 ), should make it easier for a kleptoparasite to avoid detection and capture. These observations trigger many questions. How important is the capture of tiny prey to the economy of the kleptoparasite? Exactly how does a group of these kleptoparasites affect the host? Do the kleptoparasites interact aggressively, tol- erate one another, or cooperate? How effective are the host’s anti-kleptoparasite tactics? What regulates the number of kleptoparasites in a web? Further study of the interactions among these mysmenid kleptoparasites and their hosts should provide useful insights into the behavioral ecol- ogy of kleptoparasitism and host-symbiont co- evolution. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank B. Freeman for assistance in the field and R. Lumb for discussions about the biochem- istry of insect hemolymph and digestion. This study was supported by National Science Foun- dation Grant BSR-8700298. LITERATURE CITED Baert, L. 1990. Mysmenidae (Araneae) from Peru. Bull. Inst. Royal Sci. Nat. Belgique, 60:5-18. Baert, L. L. & J. A. Murphy. 1987. Kilifia inquilina, a new mysmenid spider from Kenya (Araneae, Mys- menidae). Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 7:194-196. Baptista, R. 1988. On (Mysmenidae), a kleptoparasite of Pholcidae. American Arachnol., (38):4 (abstract). Coyle, F. A. & N. D. Ketner. 1 990. Observations on the prey and prey capture behaviour of the funnel- web mygalomorph spider genus Ischnothele (Ara- neae, Dipluridae). Bull. Brit. Arachnol. Soc., 8:97- 104. Coyle, F. A. & T. E. Meigs. 1989. Two new species of kleptoparasitic Mysmenopsis (Araneae, Dipluri- dae) from Jamaica. J. Arachnol., 17:59-70. Coyle, F. A. & T. E. Meigs. 1990. Two new species of Ischnothele funnelweb spiders (Araneae, Myga- lomorphae, Dipluridae) from Jamaica. J. Arachnol., 18:95-111. Florkin, M. & C. Jeuniaux. 1974. Hemolymph: Com- position. Pp. 256-308, In The Physiology of Insecta. Vol. 5 (M. Rockstein, ed.). Academic Press, New York. Griswold, C. E. 1985. Isela okuncana, a new genus and species of kleptoparasitic spider from southern Africa (Araneae: Mysmenidae). Ann. Natal Mus., 27:207-217. Griswold, C. E. & T. Meikle-Griswold. 1987. Ar- chaeodictyna ulova, new species (Araneae: Dictyn- idae), a remarkable kleptoparasite of group-living eresid spiders (Stegodyphus spp., Araneae: Eresi- dae). Amer. Mus. Novitates, (2897): 1-1 1. Mullins, D. E. 1985. Chemistry and physiology of the hemolymph. Pp. 355-400, In Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Vol. 3 (G. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert, eds.). Per- gamon Press, Oxford. Platnick, N. 1. & M. U. Shadab. 1978. A review of the spider genus Mysmenopsis (Araneae, Mysmen- idae). Amer. Mus. Novitates, (2661): 1-22. Vollrath, F. 1978. A close relationship between two spiders (Arachnida, Araneidae): Curimagua bayano synecious on a Diplura species. Psyche, 85:347-353. Vollrath, F. 1979. Behaviour of the kleptoparasitic spider Argyrodes elevatus (Araneae, Theridiidae). Anim. Behav., 27:515-521. Vollrath, F. 1981. Energetic considerations of a spi- der parasite-spider host system. Rev. Arachnol., 3: 37-44. Vollrath, F. 1984. Kleptobiotic interactions in in- vertebrates. Pp. 6 1-93, In Producers and Scroungers (C. J. Barnard, ed.). Chapman and Hall, New York. Vollrath, F. 1987. Kleptobiosis in spiders. Pp. 274- 286, In Ecophysiology of Spiders (W. Nentwig, ed.). Springer- Verlag, Berlin. Whitehouse, M. 1986. The foraging behaviours of Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae), a kleptopar- asitic spider from New Zealand. New Zealand J. Zool., 13:151-168. Manuscript received August 1990, revised October 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:67-69 DEVELOPMENT AND REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL OF FLORINDA COCCINEA (ARANEAE, LINYPHIIDAE) Marianne B, Willey and Peter H. Adler: Department of Entomology, Clemson Uni- versity, Clemson, South Carolina 29634 USA Abstract. Development and reproduction of the red grass spider, Florinda coccinea (Hentz), from South Carolina were studied under laboratory conditions (26 ± 2 °C). Both males and females required five molts to reach maturity, although 10% of the males had one super- numerary molt. Once mature, females lived approximately one month, or nearly twice as long as males. Laboratory-reared females produced as many as six fertile egg sacs, whereas field-collected females produced up to ten sacs. The first sac of laboratory-reared females had the largest average clutch size - about 70 eggs. The reproductive capacity of females mated with unmated males versus those mated with previously mated males was not sig- nificantly different. The red grass spider, Florinda coccinea (Hentz), is common throughout southeastern North America. Despite its abundance, biological in- formation on this species, like that of the vast majority of linyphiids, is sparse. The only bio- logical study of F. coccinea is an unpublished thesis on territoriality (Ross 1977). Because so little is known about this species, we undertook this study to determine the developmental and reproductive biology under standardized labo- ratory conditions, and to relate these aspects to our field observations. MATERIALS AND METHODS We collected adult females of F. coccinea (N = 34) from lily turf (Liriope muscaria) on the Clemson University campus on 8 May 1989. These spiders and all subsequent offspring were held individually in plastic containers (3.7 cm deep X 5.2 cm diameter) in an environmental chamber (26 ± 2 °C, 65 ± 4% R. H., 14L:10D photoperiod). Field-collected females had live Drosophila melanogaster and moist cotton in their containers at all times. All offspring had constant access to moist cotton and were provided ap- proximately ten small leafhoppers or flies per day. Developmental biology was determined as fol- lows. On 6 June 1989, we removed ten spider- lings from each of the first six clutches produced by the field-collected females, and successfully reared 22 females and 1 4 males to maturity. These spiders (F,) were mated, and on 4 July 1989, we removed a total of 60 of their offspring (Fj, 1 0 spiderlings from each of 6 clutches) and suc- cessfully reared 21 females and 25 males to ma- turity. For Fi and Fj spiderlings, we recorded the duration of each post-emergence instar by ex- amining containers daily for exuviae. Occasion- ally (33.6%, N = 332) exuviae were not located, and this caused variation in sample sizes. To test for protandry, we determined the average num- ber of days from the second molt to the final molt for males and females. We used once-mat- ed spiders to compare male (N = 13) and female {N= 29) longevity from the date of maturity until death. To determine reproductive capacity of F. coc- cinea , we monitored field-collected females and their F, and Fj offspring. Fi females {N = 15) were mated (8 days after the final molt) with virgin males (A = 9, 7 days after final molt) or with once-mated males (A = 6, 11-15 days after final molt). F2 females (A = 18, 2-8 days after final molt) were mated with virgin males (A = 1 5, 3-4 days after final molt) or with once-mated males (A = 3, 7 days after final molt). We re- moved females from each of their successive egg sacs within 1 2 h of construction, and monitored them for production of additional sacs. We re- corded the date of construction of each egg sac (A = 95), the clutch size (spiderlings plus un- hatched eggs) (A = 93), and the date of first spi- derling emergence from each egg sac (A = 50). Oviposition times, clutch sizes, and spiderling- emergence times did not differ significantly be- tween females mated with virgin males and those mated with experienced males (ANOVA, P > 68 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1. — Days (x ± SE, N) required for development of Florinda coccinea in the laboratory (26 ± 2 °C). a = supernumerary molts. Intermolt interval Generation 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 F, 6.4 ± 0.30, 35 4.6 ±0.13, 34 5.2 ± 0.12, 35 _ F2 5.5 ± 0.26, 40 4.0 ±0.17, 43 5.3 ± 0.11, 44 4.7 ± 0.33, 3“ 0.05), so these groups were combined for sub- sequent analyses. If there were no significant dif- ferences between the Fi and F2 generations, data for the two groups were combined. We deposited voucher specimens of both sexes in the Clemson University Arthropod Collec- tion. RESULTS Developmental biology.— Both males and fe- males required five molts to reach maturity, al- though four males (10.2%) had one supernu- merary molt (Table 1). The first of these five molts occurred within the egg sac. Approxi- mately 70% of second-instar spiderlings {N = 1 20) constructed webs after emergence from the egg sac; the remainder, which did not construct webs, died before the next molt. The number of days required to reach maturity was not signif- icantly different {F = 0.89, df = P = 0.3475) between males {X = 15.8, SE = 0.41, A = 36) and females {X = 15.2, SE = 0.30, N = 40), although longevity of adult females {X = 27.8, SE = 2.66 days, N = 29) exceeded that of adult males {X = 16.1, SE = 3.15 days, N = 13) (/- test, df= 40, P = 0.013). Reproductive biology.— Of the laboratory- reared females that produced egg sacs (N = 32), more than half produced at least three sacs, with the maximum number of sacs being six (Table 2). Intervals between production of the second through fifth sacs did not differ significantly. The first sac had a significantly larger average clutch size than successive sacs (Table 3). Field-col- lected females produced up to ten egg sacs {X = 4.4, SE = 0.46, N = 25); however, these values are minima because females might have ovipos- ited prior to collection. Egg sacs were not retained in the web, but were constructed in the bottom of the container, suggesting that in the field they are deposited at the base of vegetation. Spiderling-emergence times from successive egg sacs {X = 12.8, SE = 0.23, A = 51 ) did not differ significantly between generations (A = 0.3 1 , df = P = 0.5836) or among successive sacs {F = 0.97, df=2,P^ 0.3858). Of the sacs in which spiderlings were produced (74.2%, A = 93), young were unable to emerge from 30.4%. The re- maining sacs, including all fifth and sixth sacs, contained only eggs. DISCUSSION Our study of F. coccinea is the first study of a North American linyphiid to address develop- mental rates within each stadium in males and Table 2. — Days (x ± SE) between sequential ovi- positions of Florinda coccinea in the laboratory (26 ± 2 °C). Times were not significantly different between theF, and Fj generations (/"= 0.23, 1, P = 0.6354). Adjusted means followed by different letters are sig- nificantly different {P < 0.05; LSMeans procedure, SAS Institute 1985). Oviposition events No. days between oviposition events A Sac #1-Sac #2 4.8 ± 0.21a 25 Sac #2-Sac #3 5.7 ± 0.66a 19 Sac #3-Sac #4 5.3 ± 0.21a 10 Sac #4-Sac #5 6. 1 ± 0.76a 6 Sac # 5-Sac #6 9.7 ± 2.19b 3 Table 3.— Clutch sizes {X ± SE) of consecutive egg sacs constructed by Florinda coccinea in the laboratory (26 ± 2 °C). Clutch sizes were not significantly different between the F, and Fj generations (F = 2.96, df= I, P = 0.0893). Adjusted means followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05; LSMeans procedure, SAS Institute 1985). Egg sac number Clutch size A Sac#l 70.5 ± 2.71a 32 Sac #2 61.6 ± 3.06b 23 Sac #3 62.0 ± 2.13b 19 Sac #4 59.6 ± 3.03a 10 Sac #5 50.2 ± 7.75b 6 Sac #6 48.5 ± 9.96b 3 WILLEY & ADLER -REPRODUCTION OF FLORINDA COCCINEA 69 females. Shorter developmental times for F. coc- cinea observed in our study relative to the few developmental studies of Old World linyphiids (Turnbull 1962; De Keer & Maelfait 1987a, 1987b), might be due to higher rearing temper- atures and unlimited food in our study. Although male spiders are generally smaller than females and, therefore, require fewer molts (Foelix 1982), male and female linyphiids are approximately the same size and have the same number of molts or, as in F. coccinea, males sometimes have su- pernumerary molts. Life cycles of linyphiids have been described as either univoltine (Schaefer 1976; Christophe 1977), bivoltine (Baert 1978), polymorphic (Wise 1974, 1976), or diplochronic (Toft 1976; Wise 1984). F. coccinea in upstate South Carolina is apparently multivoltine. However, the short gen- eration time and overlapping cohorts from mul- tiple egg sacs make it difficult to determine the number of generations per year. We have found all instars and adults of both sexes throughout the year in South Carolina. The developmental and reproductive biology of F. coccinea is similar to that of other spiders. For instance, a general trend among spiders is for females to live longer than males (Foelix 1982), and for the first egg sac to have the largest clutch size (Preston-Mafham & Preston-Mafham 1984). The production of six to ten egg sacs by F. coccinea falls within the range found in other linyphiids, although the clutch size of F. coccinea was larger than that of Oedothorax fuscus (De Keer & Maelfait 1987a) and Fwntinella pyr- amitela (Austad 1982), perhaps because F. coc- cinea was provided more food. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank J. D. Culin for reviewing the manu- script and H. S. Hill, Jr. for statistical advice. This is technical contribution No. 3047 of the South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Clemson University. LITERATURE CITED Austad, S. N. 1982. First male sperm priority in the bowl and doily spider, Fwntinella pyramitela (Wal- ckenaer). Evolution, 36:777-785. Baert, L. 1978. Influence de la photo periodicite sur la maturation ovarienne chez Gongylidiurn rufipes. Rev. Arachnol., 2:23-27. Christophe, T. 1977. Etude demographique d’une population de I'araignee Macragus rufus (Wider) (Linyphiidae). Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 102:187-196. De Keer, R. & J. -P. Maelfait. 1987a. Laboratory observations on the development and reproduction of Oedothorax fuscus (Blackwall, 1834) (Araneida, Linyphiidae) under different conditions of temper- ature and food supply. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol., 24:63- 73. De Keer, R. & J. -P. Maelfait. 1987b. Life history of Oedothorax fuscus (Blackwall, 1834) (Araneae, Lin- yphiidae) in a heavily grazed pasture. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol., 24:171-185. Foelix, R. F. 1982. Biology of Spiders. Harvard Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 306 pp. Preston-Mafham, R. & K. Preston-Mafham. 1984. Spiders of the World. Facts on File, Inc., New York. 191 pp. Ross, J. W. 1977. Evidence for territoriality in the line-weaving spider, Florinda coccinea (Hentz). M. S. Thesis, University of Tennessee. SAS Institute. 1985. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, 5th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina. Schaefer, M. 1976. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zum Jahreszyklus und zur Uberwinterung von Spin- nen (Araneida). Zool. Jb. Syst., 103:127-289. Toft, S. 1976. Life-histories of spiders in a Danish beech wood. Natura Jutlandica, 19:5-40. Turnbull, A. L. 1962. Quantitative studies of the food of Linyphia triangularis Clerck (Araneae: Linyphi- idae). Can. Entomol., 94:1233-1249. Wise, D. H. 1974. Role of food supply in the pop- ulation dynamics of the spider Linyphia marginaia. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Wise, D. H. 1976. Variable rates of maturation of the spider Neriene radiata (Linyphia marginata). Am. Midi. Nat., 96:66-75. Wise, D. H. 1984. Phenology and life history of the filmy dome spider (Araneae:Linyphiidae) in two lo- cal Maryland populations. Psyche, 91:267-288. Manuscript received April 1990, revised October 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:70-71 RESEARCH NOTE CENTRUROIDES HASETHI POCOCK, A JUNIOR SYNONYM OF CENTRUROIDES TESTACEUS (DEGEER) (SCORPIONES, BUTHIDAE) DeGeer (1778) described Scorpio testaceus from specimens collected in “Amerique” and, since that time, no one has been able to assign a correct locality to that taxon. This species, now considered a valid member of the genus Centru- roides, was redescribed by Sissom and Francke (1983). Those authors discounted previous re- cords of C. testaceus as being based upon misi- dentifications, including long-accepted records from Montserrat and Hispaniola (Haiti). Because the two syntypes of C. testaceus represented dif- ferent species, the lectotype designated by Sissom and Francke remained the only known specimen of C. testaceus. While sorting through undetermined scorpion material from the Field Museum of Natural His- tory, Chicago, I had the opportunity to examine a specimen of Centruroides hasethi hasethi Po- cock from the island of Curagao. I was imme- diately struck by the resemblance of the speci- men from Curagao to the lectotype of C. testaceus and borrowed the types of C. testaceus and C. hasethi from their respective depositories. Com- parison of the type specimens confirmed my sus- picions that C. testaceus and C. hasethi were con- specific. Sissom and Francke (1983) mistakenly iden- tified the lectotype of C. testaceus as a female because its metasomal segments are not as long and slender as those of males of most species of Centruroides (including the male syntype of Scorpio testaceus accompanying the lectotype). Unfortunately, the lectotype was pinned and dried and could not be sexed by the presence or ab- sence of genital papillae. As a result, our mor- phometric comparisons with C. hasethi were based on females of that species. It is now clear that the lectotype of C. testaceus is indeed a male, and its morphometries and meristics are virtu- ally identical with those of male C. hasethi from Curagao (Bakker 1963). Since Bakker’s (1963) study of the Centru- roides populations of Curagao and neighboring islands, C. hasethi has been considered polytypic, with two distinct subspecies: C. hasethi hasethi Pocock from Curagao and Bonaire, and C. has- ethi arubensis (Bakker) from Aruba. Bakker (1963) distinguished the two subspecies by the following characters (based on comparisons be- tween the populations of C. hasethi hasethi from Curagao and C. hasethi arubensis from Aruba). (1) in C. /z. hasethi, males have 27-29 pectinal teeth and females 25-27 teeth; in C. h. arubensis, males have 23-25 teeth and females 21-23; (2) C. h. hasethi range up to 75 mm in body length, whereas C. h. arubensis reach only 55 mm in length; (3) C. h. hasethi have proportionately lon- ger metasomal segments; and (4) C. h. hasethi have proportionately longer pedipalpal femora and patellae. Interestingly, according to mea- surements and ratios published by Bakker (1963), the morphometries of the Bonaire population are in some cases intermediate between those of the populations of Curagao and Aruba, suggesting that further study of the taxonomic status of each population may be warranted. Based on the ob- servations above and on direct comparisons of type specimens, there is no doubt that C. testa- ceus and C. hasethi hasethi belong to the same taxon. Further, because of the morphometric similarities with specimens from Curagao, it is probable that the lectotype of C. testaceus orig- inated from that island, and I hereby restrict the type locality of C. testaceus to Curagao, Neth- erlands Antilles. Pending further investigation of the various island populations, arubensis is con- sidered a subspecies of C. testaceus. As a consequence of the above observations, the following synonymies are proposed: Centru- roides hasethi Pocock, 1893 = Centruroides tes- taceus (DeGeer, 1778); C. hasethi hasethi Po- cock, 1893 = C. testaceus testaceus (DeGeer 1778); and C. hasethi arubensis (Bakker, 1963) = C. testaceus arubensis (Bakker, 1963). The author is grateful to T. Kronestedt (Na- turhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm) for allow- RESEARCH NOTE 71 ing me to reexamine the lectotype of C. testaceus\ P. D. Hillyard (British Museum of Natural His- tory, London) for allowing me to examine the holotype of C. hasethi] and D. A. Summers, J. Ashe, and R. F. Inger (Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago) for allowing me access to their undetermined scorpion material. LITERATURE CITED Bakker, M. A. 1963. A new subspecies of the scorpion Rhopalurus hasethi. Studies on the Fauna of Cu- rasao and Other Caribbean Islands, No. 70:102- 117. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:71-72 DeGeer, C. 1778. Memoires pour servir a I’histoire des Insectes. Stockholm, 7:337-349. Sissom, W. D. & O. F. Francke. 1983. Redescription of Centruroides testaceus (DeGeer) and description of a new species from the Lesser Antilles (Scor- piones: Buthidae). Occas. Papers Mus. Texas Tech Univ., 88:1-13. W. David Sissom: Department of Biology, Elon College, Elon College, North Carolina 27244 USA. Manuscript received July 1990, revised October 1990. BOOK REVIEW Polis, Gary A. 1990. The Biology of Scorpions. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 587 pp. (Price $85.00.) The editor of this volume, Gary Polis, and a determined crew of nine contributors have com- piled an impressive assemblage of fact and eso- terica about world scorpions; 485 pages of text in all and covering morphology, systematics, pa- leontology, biogeography, population biology, ecology, behavior, environmental physiology, neurobiology, venom toxicology, and even my- thology. The comprehensiveness of coverage and the terse, highly readable style of the book suggest what might be its hidden purpose— the attraction of young scientists into an open field of over- looked research. The first two chapters, a full third of the book, give excellent preparation for literature reading and research on scorpions. There are diagrammatic summaries of basic anatomy (Hjelle) and group systematics, with lu- cid descriptions of biogeography and paleontol- ogy (Sissom). The epic restudy of the scorpion fossil record by Kjellesvig-Waering (published 1986) is carefully summarized so that even a physiologist can follow the emergence of the group from gill-breathing descendants of a eurypterid line (Silurian aquatic forms), through the ap- pearance of terrestrial fauna (probably upper De- vonian) and their peak in species diversity during the Carboniferous (at least 1 3 superfamilies com- pared to the modem three). We are reminded that the 1400 species surviving today are re- markably similar to their Paleozoic ancestors al- though mere remnants of what once was. There are useful keys to modem families, subfamilies and genera, with clear drawings of diagnostic fea- tures used to distinguish them. The middle third of this book is dedicated to life history (Polis and Sissom), behavior (War- burg and Polis), ecology (Polis) and predator- prey relations (McCormick and Polis) of scor- pions. Here we learn just how little is known about such basic characteristics as embryology (perhaps a dozen works in all, the most complete published before 1900), post-natal growth and sexual development (some live 25 years). Most scorpions live in deserts or temperate regions of the world as solitary, cannibalistic burrowers. Given the impracticalities of working in deserts at night, one is sympathetic to Polis’s assertion that “ecology is the least known aspect of scor- pion biology,” and is deserving of much greater attention. Here Polis has been a vanguard, uti- lizing portable UV lights (scorpion cuticle fluo- resces under UV) to make broad-ranging obser- vations of natural habits, population biology and community stmcture. Many unanswered ques- tions arise in these pages, especially concerning tropical scorpions, which are virtually unstudied. 72 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY This section is the book’s center of mass, and while it may suffer from eclecticism, it should provide strong stimulation for further field-ori- ented research. Judging from the number of cof- fee stains, these were for me the most difficult and important chapters to read. The last third of this volume contains excellent summaries of environmental physiology (Had- ley), neurobiology (Root) and venom biochem- istry/pathophysiology (Simard and Watt). Here we learn about the peculiar, often unique, aspects of scorpion physiology and biochemistry that have enabled these animals to invade harsh en- vironments and to thrive as nocturnal insecti- vores. For desert species, a water-impermeable cuticle, low basal metabolism and conservative periods of activity outside the burrow were pre- dictable responses to heat and water stresses. But who could have imagined the array of non-visual cues these animals use in darkness to capture prey and to locate suitable mates. Scorpion tox- ins have attracted the greatest outside attention, mostly from vertebrate physiologists and bio- chemists who use them as tools for studies of nerve and muscle excitability. As the primary structures of these peptides become known, new questions emerge concerning structure/function relationships of protein macromolecules and phylogenetic relationships within an ancient group of organisms. Indeed, these invertebrate incarnations of evil are very good preparations for all sorts of biology, from molecular to evo- lutionary levels of study. The book ends with a practical chapter on field and laboratory methods (collection, rearing, dissection, preservation) and a wonderful synopsis of scorpion lore, both mythological and historical, by Cloudsley- Thompson. Thumbing back through these pages, straight- ening folded comers and reading notes penciled in the margins, I am struck again by the overall good quality of research on scorpions and the care with which it has been presented here. One senses in the doing and the writing a special af- fection for these animals so long feared and ne- glected by humans. It is as though justice has finally been done and we are witness to the cer- tain injection of a new subject into our science. Philip H. Brownell: Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 USA INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Manuscripts are preferred in English but may be accepted in Spanish, French or Portuguese subject to availability of appropriate reviewers. Authors whose primary language is not English, may consult the Associate Editor for assistance in obtaining help with English manuscript preparation. All man- uscripts should be prepared in general accordance vrith the current edition of the Council of Biological Editors ( CBE) Style Manual unless instructed otherwise below. Authors are ad- vised to consult a recent issue of the Journal of Arachnology for additional points of style. Send three identical copies of the typed material together with copies of illustrations to: Gary L. Miller, Associate Editor The Journal of Arachnology Department of Biology The University of Mississippi University, Mississippi 38677 USA Telephone: (601) 232-7495 FAX: (601) 232-5144 Bitnet: BYMILLER@UMSVM Correspondence relating to manuscripts should also be di- rected to the Associate Editor. Manuscripts longer than 1 500 words should be prepared as Feature Articles, shorter papers as Research Notes. FEATURE ARTICLES Title page.— Place in the upper left comer the complete name, address, and telephone number of the author with whom proofs and correspondence should be exchanged. Include FAX num- bers and Bitnet addresses if available. Four lines below, type the title, centered, all in capital letters. Another four lines be- low, beginning with the left margin, type each author’s name on a new line followed by the address. Abstract.— The heading should be placed at the beginning of the first paragraph set off by a period. In articles written in English, a second abstract in an acceptable language may be included pertinent to the nationality of the author(s) or geo- graphic region(s) emphasized in the article. A second abstract in English must be included in articles not written in the latter language. Text.— Double-space text, tables, legends, etc. throughout. Three levels of heads are used. The first level (METHODS, RESULTS, etc.) is typed in capitals and on a separate line. The second level head begins a paragraph with an indent and is separated from the text by a period and a dash. The third level may or may not begin a paragraph but is underscored and separated from the text by a colon. Use only the underline method to indicate italics; DO NOT USE WORD PROCES- SOR ITALICS CODES. Use the metric system unless quoting text or referencing collection data. All decimal fractions are indicated by the period regardless of language of the text. Citation of references in the text.— Include within parenthe- ses the surnames of the author(s) followed by the date of pub- lication. A comma separates multiple citations by the same author(s) and a semicolon separates citations by different au- thors, e.g., (Smith 1970), (Jones 1988; Smith 1989), (Smith 1986, 1987; Smith & Jones 1989; Jones et al. 1989). Literature cited section.— Use the following style: Lombardi, S. J. & D. L. Kaplan. 1990. The amino acid composition of major ampullate gland silk (dragline) of Ne- phila clavipes (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J. Arachnol., 1 8: 297-306. KrafR, B. 1982. The significance and complexity of com- munication in spiders. Pp. 1 5-66, In Spider Communica- tions: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance. (P. N. Witt & J. S. Rovner, eds.). PrincetonUniversity Press, Princeton. Footnotes.— Footnotes are only permitted on the first printed page to indicate current address or other information con- cerning the author(s). All footnotes are placed together on a separate manuscript page. Running head.— Author sumame(s) and an abbreviated title must be typed all in caps and must not exceed 60 characters and spaces. The running head is placed by itself on a separate manuscript page. Taxonomic articles.— Consult a recent taxonomic article in the Journal of Arachnology for style or contact the Associate Editor. Tables.— Each table, with the legend above, should be placed on a separate manuscript page. Only the appropriate horizontal lines should be included. Use no footnotes; instead, include all information in the legend. Make notations in the text mar- gins to indicate the preferred location of tables in the printed text. Illustrations.— Original art work should be kept by the au- thor(s) until final acceptance for publication. All art work must be mounted on stiff board ready for reproduction. In line draw- ings, pay particular attention to width of lines and size of lettering when reductions are to be made by the printer. Mul- tiple photos assembled on a single plate should be mounted with only a minimum of space separating them. In the case of multiple illustrations mounted together, each illustration must be numbered sequentially rather than given an alphabetic se- quence. Written on the back should be the name(s) of author(s), an indication of top edge, and whether the art work should be returned. The overall dimensions should be no more than 1 1 inches (28 cm) x 14 inches (36 cm). Larger drawings present greater difficulty in shipping and greater risks of damage for which the JOA assumes no responsibility. The author is en- couraged to consider PMT (PhotoMechanical Transfer) repro- ductions for large drawings and to consult an Editor for details on appropriate reductions. Make notations in the text margins to indicate the preferred position of illustrations in the printed text. Legends for illustrations should be placed together on the same page(s) and separate from the illustrations. Adhere to the following styles: Figures 1-4.— A-us x-us, male from Timbuktu: 1, left leg; 2, right chelicera; 3, dorsal aspect of genitalia; 4, ventral aspect of abdomen. Figures 27-34. — Right chelicerae of species of A-us from Timbuktu: 27, 29, 31, 33, dorsal views; 28, 30, 32, 34, prolater- al views of moveable finger; 27, 28, A-us x-us, holotype male; 29, 30, A-us, w-us, holotype male; 31, 32, A-us z-us, holotype male; 33, 34, A-us y-us, male. Scales = 1.0 mm. Assemble manuscript for mailing.— Assemble the separate sections or pages in the following sequence; title page, abstract, text, figure legends, footnotes, running head, tables with leg- ends, figures. Page charges and reprints.— The current charge per journal page will be assessed as follows: $50— nonmembers, $45 — members with grant, institutional, or other support for page costs; $25— regular members who do not have support for page costs; $20— student members who do not author with full members and who do not have support. Limited grants may be available to help defray publication costs. Consult the As- sociate Editor for details. Reprints are available only from the printer at current costs. RESEARCH NOTES Instructions above pertaining to feature articles apply also to research notes except that abstracts and most headings are not used and the byline follows the Literature Cited section. CONTENTS THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY VOLUME 19 Feature Articles NUMBER 1 On South American Teminius (Araneae, Miturgidae), Norman I. Platnick and Martin J. Ramirez 1 Systematic studies on the Nitidulus group of the genus Vaejovis, with de- scriptions of seven new species (Scorpiones, Vaejovidae), W. David Sissom 4 A new species of wolf spider, Schizocosa stridulans (Araneae, Lycosidae), Gail E. Stratton 29 Ontogenic and seasonal changes in webs and websites of a desert widow spider, Yael Lubin, Mandy Kotzman and Stephen Ellner 40 Dispersal and survivorship in a population of Geolycosa turricola (Araneae, Lycosidae), Patricia R. Miller and Gary L. Miller 49 A revision of the genus Zora (Araneae, Zoridae) in North America, David T. Corey and Daniel J. Mott 55 Observations on the behavior of the kleptoparasitic spider, Mysmenopsis furtiva (Araneae, Mysmenidae), Frederick A. Coyle, Theresa C. O’Shields and Daniel G. Perlmutter 62 Development and reproductive potential of Florinda coccinea (Araneae, Linyphiidae), Marianne B. Willey and Peter H. Adler 67 Research Note Centruroides hasethi Pocock, a junior synonym of Centruroides testaceus (DeGeer) (Scorpiones, Buthidae), W. David Sissom 70 Book Review The Biology of Scorpions (edited by Gary A. Polis), Philip H. Brownell ... 71 L The Journal of AP^CHNOLOGY VOLUME 19 1991 NUMBER 2 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY EDITOR: James E. Carico, Lynchburg College ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Gary L. Miller, The University of Mississippi EDITORIAL BOARD: J. E. Carrel, Univ. Missouri; J. A. Coddington, Na- tional Mus. Natural Hist.; J. C. Cokendolpher, Lubbock, Texas; F. A. Coyle, Western Carolina Univ.; C. D. Dondale, Agriculture Canada; W. G. Eberhard, Univ. Costa Rica; M. E. Galiano, Mus. Argentine de Ciencias Naturales; M. H. Greenstone, BCIRL, Columbia, Missouri; N. V. Horner, Midwestern State Univ.; D. T. Jennings, Garland, Maine; V. F. Lee, California Acad. Sci.; H. W. Levi, Harvard Univ.; E. A. Maury, Mus. Argentine de Ciencias Naturales; N. I. Plat- nick, American Mus. Natural Hist.; G. A. Polls, Vanderbilt Univ.; S. E. Riechert, Univ. Tennesse; A. L. Rypstra, Miami Univ., Ohio; M. H. Robinson, U.S. Na- tional Zool. Park; W. A. Shear, Hampden-Sydney Coll.; G. W. Uetz, Univ. Cin- cinnati; C. E. Valerio, Univ. Costa Rica. The Journal of Arachnology (ISSN 0160-8202), a publication devoted to the study of Arachnida, is published three times each year by The American Arach- nological Society. Memberships (yearly): Membership is open to all those inter- ested in Arachnida. Subscriptions to The Journal of Arachnology and American Arachnology (the newsletter), and annual meeting notices, are included with mem- bership in the Society. Regular, $30; Students, $20; Institutional, $80 (USA) or $90 (all other countries). Inquiries should be directed to the Membership Secretary (see below). Back Issues: Susan E. Riechert, Department of Zoology, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37916 USA. Undelivered Issues: Allen Press, Inc., 1041 New Hampshire Street, P.O. Box 368, Lawrence, Kansas 66044 USA. THE AMERICAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY PRESIDENT: George W. Uetz (1989-1991), Department ofBiological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA. PRESIDENT-ELECT: Allen R. Brady (1989-1991), Biology Department, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49423 USA. MEMBERSHIP SECRETAR Y: Norman I. Platnick (appointed), American Mu- seum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, New York 10024 USA. TREASURER: Gail E. Stratton (1989-1991), Department of Biology, Albion College, Albion, Michigan 49224 USA. SECRETARY: James W. Berry (1989-1991), Department ofBiological Sciences, Butler University, Indianapolis, Indiana 46208 USA. ARCHIVIST: Vincent D. Roth, Box 136, Portal, Arizona 85632 USA. DIRECTORS: Petra Sierwald (1989-1991), William A. Shear (1989-1991), Matthew H. Greenstone (1990-1992). HONORARY MEMBERS: C. D. Dondale, W. J. Gertsch, H. Homann, H. W. Levi, A. F. Millidge, M. Vachon, T. Yaginuma. Cover illustration: Female Phidippus mystaceus, (Araneae, Salticidae), Eastern USA, by G. B. Edwards. THIS PUBLICATION IS PRINTED ON ACID-FREE PAPER. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:73-79 SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF LYCOSA TARENTULA FASCIIVENTRIS (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) IN A POPULATION FROM CENTRAL SPAIN Carmen Fernandez-Montraveta,* Rafael Lahoz-Beltra** and Joaquin Ortega*: *Depar- tamento Psicologia Biologica y de la Salud, Universidad Autonoma, Cantoblanco, 28049-Madrid, Spain; **Departamento Matematica Aplicada, Universidad Complu- tense, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040-Madrid, Spain Abstract. The burrow spatial distribution pattern in a population of Lycosa tarentula fasciiventris from central Spain was studied. The developmental stage of the individual occupying the burrow, as well as the burrow spatial coordinates were measured during the spring and summer. A three-dimensional distribution pattern was obtained and Morisita, mean-crowding and variance-mean coefficient indices of burrow density were calculated. The burrow distribution pattern changed throughout the study period. Subadult burrow location shows a tendency toward instability whereas location stability of adult individuals is greater. In both cases there is a tendency towards clumping, which is lesser in the case of adult animals: if mean distances among burrows are compared between clumps, a tendency towards regularity results in the latter case. The observed distribution pattern might be a result of interspecific competition leading to a territorial system, with adult females con- stituting the structural support of the population. Resumen. Memos estudiado el patron de distribucion espacial de una poblacion de Lycosa tarentula fasciiventris del centro de Espana. Durante la primavera y el verano, se midieron las coordenadas espaciales de los nidos, asi como la fase de desarrollo del individuo que lo ocupaba. A partir de los datos, se ha reconstruido el patron tridimensional de distribucion, y se han calculado los indices de Morisita y mean-crowding, asi como el cociente varianza-media de la densidad de los nidos. A lo largo del periodo de estudio se observa una modificacion en el patron de distribucion de los nidos. Los nidos de los individuos subadultos muestran una tendencia a la inestabilidad, mientras que los ocupados por in- dividuos adultos tienen una localizacion mas estable. En ambos casos, se observa una tendencia a la agregacion, que es menos marcada para los individuos adultos: si se comparan las distancias medias entre los nidos dentro de cada agregado, aparece una tendencia a la regularidad en el ultimo caso. El patron de distribucion espacial podria ser el resultado de la competicion intraespecifica, que determinaria un sistema de tipo territorial, siendo las hembras adultas el soporte estructural de la poblacion. In the non-social species, competition usually takes place in the form of struggling for a mate or for food (Burgess & Uetz 1982) and will be more severe between individuals of the same sex and age because they have similar requirements (McBride 1970; Dunbar 1986). This can lead to interindividual spacing that reflects resource dis- tribution (McBride 1970). When resources are limited, competition is believed to be the main determinant for the population spatial structure (Riechert et al. 1973). Intraspecific aggression is a way of competition (Wilson 1 975; Huntingford & Turner 1987), and species and/or individuals showing an active defense behavior may also be the ones showing the greatest regularity in their spacing patterns (Burgess & Uetz 1 982). Aggressive and defensive behavior has been reported in several spider families (Rovner 1 968; Dijkstra 1969; Buskirk 1975; Riechert 1978; Jackson 1980; Jacques & Dill 1980; Goist 1982; Christenson 1 984; Nossek & Rovner 1984; Hodge 1986, 1987; Wells 1988). Usually, studies of ag- gression as a means of competition have focused on male-male interactions in reproductive con- texts (Rovner 1968; Dijkstra 1969; Jackson 1980; Goist 1982; Austad 1983). The study of com- petition for food or spatial resources not related to gaining access to a female received lesser at- 73 74 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY tention (Buskirk 1975; Riechert 1978, 1980; Hodge 1987). When competition for food re- sources was studied, spacing was shown to be actively maintained by means of agonistic inter- actions (Buskirk 1975; Hodge 1986) and to fit models ascribed to territorial systems (Buskirk 1975; Riechert 1978, 1982). Most previous work on spatial distribution of spiders has been carried out on web-building spe- cies. The study of individual spatial distribution of species of Lycosidae, non-web-building ones, has not been too extensively put forward. Kuen- zler (1958) reported that the spatial distribution of three species of the genus Lycosa showed a random pattern in a uniform environment. How- ever, the active maintenance of spacing is a prev- alent pattern (McBride 1970), and spiders seem more often to be territorial animals (Riechert 1980; Maynard Smith & Riechert 1984). Our laboratory studies on the agonistic be- havior of adult female Lycosa tarentula fascii- ventris, suggest that agonistic interactions are a way of competing for burrows. Agonistic inter- actions usually occur inside the burrows, and the result of these interactions is the expulsion of one of the contenders (Femandez-Montraveta & Ortega 1990). Spiders of this species build tu- bular burrows in the ground, with an opening to the exterior which is sometimes surrounded by a cylindrical structure (Ortega 1 986). Individuals spend most of their time in their burrows, and prey capture patterns seem to be related to them (Ortega 1985). If the agonistic behavior of adult females of Lycosa t.fasciiventris is really a way of competing for burrow sites, it might be expected that in- dividual spacing patterns fit a non-random dis- tribution, probably a regular one (Burgess & Uetz 1982). That distribution would primarily in- volve individuals of the same age and sex. In this paper, we measure the burrow spatial distribu- tion pattern in a population of Lycosa t. fascii- ventris in central Spain in order to determine whether it fits the non-random distribution pat- tern predicted (Riechert 1 980, 1 982). METHODS We studied a population of Lycosa t.fasciiven- tris located in “El Goloso” (“Canal de Isabel 11”) near the Universidad Autonoma de Madrid. The study area was a rectangle 200 m long and 40 m wide, with its four boundaries artificially limited by a road and a three-sided metallic fence. This area is characterized by having a sandy substrate with a poor water table and herbaceous vegeta- tion. The site was visited daily between 0900 and 1400 h during the period from April to August 1984. The study area was marked in a grid, covering the 200 X 40 m^ rectangle. Along the 200 m axis, 1 -m wide, parallel corridors were marked. These corridors were exhaustively covered in the suc- cessive visits, and the cartesian coordinates of the burrows occupied by Lycosa t. fasciiventris were recorded. Body measurements (prosoma length and width, as well as length of the first and the fourth leg pairs) and the developmental stage of each burrow occupant were recorded. Because it is difficult to accurately determine the developmental stage of the spiders, they were classified into three age categories: (1) subadult individuals bom in 1983 (S-83), (2) subadult in- dividuals bom in 1982 (S-82) and reaching their adult instar in summer 1984, and (3) adult in- dividuals. Immature individuals can be differ- entiated with regard to their year of birth, since they have markedly different sizes. With regard to sex, only adults and immature individuals at their penultimate instar can be differentiated. Animals were marked by means of a label at- tached to their prosoma. A total of 1 3 1 burrows, only considering those occupied in at least two successive visits, were included in the total analysis. Since most of the molts were not recovered, we were unable to determine whether an unmarked occupant in a burrow was the same individual that was found previously. The chance that it was, according to its measurements, was used as a criterion. Because the development rate of animals dur- ing the period studied is high, data were analyzed at two different times. First, data from May were taken into account. In this analysis, all the data were included. Secondly, data corresponding to July were analyzed. By that time, most of the initially marked S-83 individuals had disap- peared, S-82 individuals had become adults and adult males usually did not occupy their burrows. Thus, only data from adult females were includ- ed in this second analysis. The two sets of data were analyzed by intro- ducing the coordinates of the burrows into a data matrix. With this matrix, a three-dimensional surface plot was obtained with the program Golden Graphic System (Golden Software, Inc.) in order to get a graphical representation of bur- row density. Data corresponding to July were subjected to FERNANDEZ-MONTRAVETA ET AL.= SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF LYCOS A 75 Figure 1.— Study area plane with the location of the 38 adult female spider burrows which were included in the second analysis (July data). The six marked areas represent the rectangles of 250 m^ superimposed on the aggregation patches. additional analyses. These burrows were plotted as points on graph paper and counted using a sample lattice of 336 cells of 25 mm^ The fre- quencies of burrows/cell were then calculated. The measures of aggregation we used were all based on the above frequencies. These measures were mean-crowding (Lloyd 1967), Morisita’s index (Morisita 1959) and the variance-mean ra- tio (Pielou 1977). The first index provided in- formation about the mean number of burrows per burrow co-occupying a cell, while the other two visualized the spatial pattern of the burrows. Significance of variance-mean coefficient was measured by means of t = [(sVx) - l]/(2/n - l)‘^ P < 0.05 (Kershaw 1973). After the coordinates of the burrows were graphically represented, several aggregation patches clearly different from one another be- came evident. Then a rectangle of 250 m^ was superimposed on each patch, and only the bur- rows which fell into these rectangles were chosen for study (Fig. 1). The mean and the variance values of the distance from each burrow to its nearest neighbor were measured for each rect- angle (Clark & Evans 1954). The mean distances were compared between rectangles applying a test of equality of means. RESULTS Table 1 shows the number of initially located burrows that continue to be occupied in the fol- lowing visits with regard to individual age class. Data are from our first study phase. The spatial distribution pattern of individuals in May is shown in Fig. 2. Figure 3 shows the spatial distribution pattern of individuals in July, including only adult females. When the two dis- tributions (Figs. 2, 3) are compared, a change is noticed in which the area of stronger aggregation in May disperses into several patches in which burrow density is high in July. For the whole data corresponding to July, the variance-mean ratio (1.13) does not differ from random {t = 0.590). The Morisita’s index (2.15) reveals that burrows are distributed with a cer- tain tendency toward patching. Mean-crowding value (0.25), on the other hand, indicates the mean number of co-occupants to be relatively low. The mean distance to the nearest neighbor as calculated in each area (Table 2) shows some degree of spacing. By comparing the mean distances to the near- est neighbor between the different patches, we found no significant differences among five of them. Only two of the patches differ from one another with regard to this parameter (Table 3). DISCUSSION A trend to burrow aggregation around certain areas is shown in both spring and summer but Table 1.— Burrow location stability with regard to the developmental stage (age class) of the spider occupying the burrow. Individual location was more unstable dur- ing the early developmental stages than during the lat- ter, and the entire number of animals was decreasing. There was a reduction of 60% in the population size. Disappearance of S-83 individuals accounts for 84% of this reduction. (“ 34 of these individuals were found to reach their adult stage during the study period.) Age class Numbers of burrows Stable Unstable Total Subadult S-83 9 (12%) 66 (88%) 75 S-82 37» (74%) 13(26%) 50 Adult 6 (100%) 0 6 Totals 52 (40%) 79 (60%) 131 76 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 2.— Three-dimensional representation of burrow density distribution during the early study period (May). The axes labeled “x” and “y” represent the spatial coordinates of the area plane. The axis labeled “z” represents burrow density. is stronger in spring. Spiders remain compara- tively grouped during their early developmental stages (Fig. 2). A great instability of spatial lo- cation is also shown during these stages. Then, aggregation levels decrease, resulting in interin- dividual spacing together with a greater stability. These factors might result from increasing ag- gressive trends (Riechert 1978, 1980) and also from searching for suitable burrow locations, leading to the less clumped distribution pattern of adult individuals. At this point, interindivi- dua! distance, as well as location stability, are the greatest. The spatial distribution of adult females might be considered as non-random. The existence of areas with differing density might reflect the het- erogeneity of the study area conditions. In the small areas, the trend is for the females to be more regularly spaced out, suggesting spacing is actively maintained. Since adult female inter- actions occur in the laboratory resulting in one female eventually running out of the burrow FERNANDEZ-MONTRAVETA ET AL.- spatial distribution of LYCOS a 77 Figure 3. --Three dimensional representation of burrow density distribution during the latter study period (July). Axes labeled “x” and “y” represent the spatial coordinates of the area plane. Axis labeled “z” represents burrow density. (Femandez-Montraveta & Ortega 1990), we might consider the distribution pattern to be a territorial system (McBride 1970; Riechert 1980; Huntingford & Turner 1987; Hammerstein & Riechert 1988). It might be an “overlapping ter- ritorial system” in which individuals defend an area around their burrow against intrusion, de- creasing the attack intensity gradually as distance to the burrow increases (McBride 1970). Data supporting the idea that spatial distri- bution of three Nearctic species of Lycosa was random (Kuenzler 1958) were based on individ- ual location during their activity periods, not on the burrow location (two of the species not being burrowers). The burrow must be a significant resource as a shelter (Ortega 1986) as well as protection against extreme temperatures (Hum- phreys 1987; Riechert 1980). Moreover, it is 78 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 2.— Mean values (meters) and SE of nearest neighbor distance in the studied subareas. Areas Mean SE 1 1.20 0.34 2 0.56 0.13 3 0.50 0.04 4 0.66 0.18 5 0.57 0.07 6 0.45 0.19 probably associated with the predatory strategy of this non-web-building species (Burgess & Uetz 1 982; Christenson 1 984) and is not only a shelter to which animals return when disturbed (Kuen- zler 1958). The relatively great mean distance between the burrows may be a consequence of the spacing which results from agonistic interactions (Bus- kirk 1975; Hodge 1986; McBride 1970) and might reflect the minimal distance needed for intra- specific cannibalism to be reduced (Burger 1981). Territory size has been related to energy require- ments and prey availability (Riechert 1978) and might be stabilized at its greatest value, which would correspond to extremely severe situations (Riechert 1980). Interindividual distances ex- ceeding the web size have also been found in other species in which the web is considered to be the hunting territory (Buskirk 1975). Conse- quences of territorial behavior in Lycosa t. fas- ciiventris then would be that the individual’s en- ergy resources are probably assured. If territory size were fixed, it might set limits to the popu- lation size (Riechert 1980). Because of their territorial distribution, adult females might through time be the structural sup- port of the population. The size of the population studied shows sudden alterations that are prob- ably due to dispersion and mortality during the individuals’ early instars and, in the case of males, mortality during adult instar. In a population where females are competing for areas, whose size is based on available shelter and food supply, and where males are competing for females, the female spacing pattern may influence the distri- bution and size of the population to a greater extent than does that of other individuals in the population (Huntingford & Turner 1987). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was carried out thanks to the per- mission granted by “Canal de Isabel IF’ (Madrid) Table 3.— P- value for comparisons between the nearest neighbor distance in the studied subareas. Areas Areas 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 - 0.09 0.003 0.250 0.097 0.1 2 - — 0.650 0.660 0.932 0.65 3 - — — 0.207 0.436 0.65 4 - — — — 0.630 0.47 5 - - - - 0.57 6 — ■ — — — — for visiting “El Goloso” deposit. We wish to ac- knowledge the contribution in matters of style and rendering into English made by Mark Youn- german and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the previous version of this manuscript. REFERENCES CITED Austad, S. N. 1983. A game theoretical interpretation of male combat in the bowl and doily spider {Fron- tinella pyramitela). Anim. Behav., 31:59-73. Burger, J. 1981. Super-territories, a comment. Amer. Nat., 1 18:578-580. Burgess, J. W. & C. W. Uetz. 1982. Social spacing strategies in spiders. Pp. 317-322, In Spider Com- munication. Mechanisms and Ecological Signifi- cance (P. N. Witt & J. S. Rovner, eds.). Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton. Buskirk, R. E. 1975. Aggressive display and orb de- fence in a colonial spider, Metabus gravidus. Anim. Behav., 23:560-567. Christenson, T. E. 1984. Behaviour of colonial and solitary spiders of the Theriidae species Anelosimus eximius. Anim. Behav., 32:725-734. Clark, P. J. & F. C. Evans. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology, 35:445-453. Dijkstra, H. 1969. Comparative research of the court- ship behavior in the genus Pardosa. Ill: Agonistic behavior in Pardosa amentata. Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat., 2 ser., 41:91-97. Dunbar, R. I. M. 1986. Aggression. Pp. 72-79, In The Collins Encyclopedia of Animal Behaviour (P. J. B. Slater, ed.). Collins, Oxford. Femandez-Montraveta, C. & J. Ortega. 1990. El comportamiento agonistico de hembras adultas de Lycosa tarentula fasciiventris (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol., 18:49-58. Goist, K. C. 1 982. Male-male competition in the orb weaving spider Nephila clavipes. Ph.D. Diss., Tu- lane Univ. Press, New Orleans. Hammerstein, P. & S. E. Riechert. 1 988. Payoffs and strategies in spider territorial contests: ESS-analyses of two ecotypes. Evol. Ecol., 2:1 15-138. fernAndez-montraveta et al.-spatial distribution of lycosa 79 Hodge, M. 1986. The relationships between agonistic behavior and spatial organization in desert and trop- ical Metepeira spp. from Mexico. Amer. Arachnol., 34:5. Hodge, M. 1987. Agonistic interactions between fe- male bowl and doily spiders (Araneae, Linyphiidae): Owner biased outcomes. J. Arachnol., 15:241-247. Humphreys, W. F. 1987. The thermal biology of the wolf spider Lycosa tarentula (Araneae, Lycosidae) in Northern Greece. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 7, 4:117-122. Huntingford, F. & A. Turner. 1987. Animal Conflict. Chapman & Hall, London. Jackson, R. R. 1980. The mating strategy of Phidip- pus johnsoni. III. Intermale aggression and a cost- benefit analysis. J. Arachnol., 8:241-250. Jacques, A. M. & L. M. Dill. 1980. Zebra spiders use uncorrelated asymmetries to settle contests. Amer. Nat., 116:899-901. Kershaw, K. A. 1973. Quantitative and Dynamic Plant Ecology, 2nd ed. Arnold, London. Kuenzler, E. J. 1 958. Niche relations of three species of lycosid spiders. Ecology, 39, 3:494-500. Lloyd, M. 1967. Mean-crowding. J. Anim. Ecol., 36: 1-30. Maynard Smith, J. & S. E. Riechert. 1984. A con- flicting-tendency model of spider agonistic behav- iour: Hybrid-pure population line comparisons. Anim. Behav., 32:564-578. McBride, G. 1970. Theories of animal spacing: The role of flight, fight and social distance. Pp. 53-68, In The Social Use of Space in Animals and Man (A. H. Esser, ed.). Plenum Press, New York. Morisita, M. 1959. Measuring the dispersion of in- dividuals and analysis of the distributional patterns. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ., ser 2:215-235. Nossek, M. & J. S. Rovner. 1984. Agonistic behavior in female wolf-spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol., 11:407-422. Ortega, J. 1985. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of predatory behaviour of Lycosa fasciiventris Du- four (Araneae, Lycosidae). Biol. Behav., 10:55-65. Ortega, J. 1986. Posibles relaciones entre el habitat de Lycosa fasciiventris Dufour (Araneae, Lycosidae) y su comportamiento. Bol. R. Soc. Espan. Hist. Nat., 82, 1-4:121-129. Pielou, E. C. 1977. Spatial patterns and their repre- sentation by discrete distributions. Pp. 1 13-165, In Mathematical Ecology. Wiley. Riechert, S. E. 1978. Energy-based territoriality in populations of the desert spider Agelenopsis aperta (Gertsch). Symp. Zool. Soc. London, 42:21 1-222. Riechert, S. E. 1980. The consequences of being ter- ritorial: Spiders, a case study. Amer. Nat., 117:871- 892. Riechert, S. E. 1982. Spider interaction strategies: Communication vs. coercion. Pp. 281-313, In Spi- der Communication: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance (P. N. Witt & J. S. Rovner, eds.). Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton. Riechert, S. E., W. G. Reeder & T. A. Allen. 1973. Patterns of spider distribution {Agelenopsis aperta (Gertsch)) in desert grassland and recent lava bed habitats, South Central New Mexico. J. Anim. Ecol., 42:19-35. Rovner, J. S. 1968. Territoriality in the sheet-web spider Linyphia triangularis. Z. Tierpsychol., 25: 232-242. Wells, M. S. 1988. Effects of body size and resource value on fighting behaviour in a jumping spider. Anim. Behav., 36, 2:321-326. Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge. Manuscript received August 1989, revised June 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:80-84 OWNER-BIASED AGONISTIC BEHAVIOR IN FEMALE LYCOSA TARENTULA FASCIIVENTRIS (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) Carmen Fernandez-Montraveta and Joaquin Ortega: Departamento de Psicologia Biolo- gica y de la Salud, Universidad Autonoma, Cantoblanco, 28049-Madrid, Spain Abstract. Matnces of the frequency of patterns of agonistic behavior of adult female Lycosa tarentula fasciiventris throughout intra-individual sequences were analyzed by means of an analysis of variance. Behavior differences were analyzed with regard to two factors: female size and previous occupation of the burrow. Results show that females use different tactics of agonistic behavior, depending on their previous occupation of the burrow, re- gardless of the relative size differences. Resumen. Mediante un analisis de varianza aplicado a las matrices de frecuencia de las pautas en las secuencias intraindividuales de comportamiento agonistico, hemos analizado las diferencias en el comportamiento de las hembras adultas de Lycosa tarentula fasciiventris con respecto a dos variables: el tamano y la ocupacion previa del nido. Nuestros resultados indican que las hembras utilizan diferentes tacticas de comportamiento agonistico segun su ocupacion previa del nido, e independientemente de su tamano relativo. When studying agonistic behavior, the lack of intense aggression patterns has been explained by means of a theoretical game model of maxi- mizing the consequences of behavior on fitness, given both the costs associated and the frequency of using that tactic among members of the pop- ulation (Maynard Smith & Price 1973; Hunt- ingford & Turner 1987). In contexts in which escalating a fight may be dangerous and infor- mation about the opponent is easily assessed, there may be different roles used to settle the contest (Maynard Smith & Parker 1976). These roles are determined by asymmetrical features between individuals, which may or may not be correlated with the individual winning ability or the relative resource-holding potential (Maynard Smith & Parker 1976; Hammerstein 1981). The expenditure of energy an individual makes is as- sumed to be adjusted to the value of winning the contest and the probability of doing it (Maynard Smith & Price 1973; Maynard Smith & Parker 1976). Among spiders, several examples of biased ag- onistic behavior have been reported, especially among web-weaving species. Differences have been found to be usually related to individual size and previous residence (Buskirk 1975; Riechert 1978; Hodge 1987), although size dif- ference may also affect the result in this latter case if greater than a critical value (Riechert 1978). The agonistic behavior of adult females of the lycosid species Lycosa tarentula fasciiventris Du- four has been described from data obtained in our laboratory. During agonistic interactions, fe- males show stereotyped patterns of behavior, and risk of bodily harm is relatively high. We think animals exchange information throughout these contests (Fernandez-Montraveta & Ortega 1 990) and, since escalation risk is high, this informa- tion can be expected to be accurate (Parker 1 974). Animals will then be expected to accurately eval- uate the contest and then use settlement strate- gies based on asymmetrical features of previous occupation of the burrow and size (Fernandez- Montraveta & Ortega 1990). Since animals seem to occup their burrows for a long period and there is a relatively high investment of time and energy in burrow construction, individual behavior could be expected to differ with regard to residence, resident females displaying a higher interaction cost and persistence (Riechert 1 988). In this paper, interindividual differences in the frequency with which adult females of L. t. fas- ciiventris show patterns of agonistic behavior are measured with regard to the variables of size and previous occupation of the burrow. We attempt to verify if females of this species use different behavioral tactics, depending on these interin- dividual asymmetrical features. 80 FERNANDEZ-MONTRAVETA & ORTEGA-OWNER-BIASED BEHAVIOR IN LYCOSA 81 METHODS In this study 40 adult female L. t. fasciiventris were used. All the animals reached their adult instar in the laboratory and were maintained in isolation from the date of capture until obser- vation. All the animals were from the same area, near the Universidad Autonoma, 1 5 km north of Madrid (Spain). Animals were weighed and measured after undergoing their last molt. Observations were made in 30 x 1 5 x 15 cm terraria having a burrow constructed beside their front walls. The interior of the burrow was visible only during the observation time. Spiders were observed randomly paired with regard to their size, the intruder being moved to the observation terrarium just before the observation began. The resident female occupied the burrow inside the terrarium for at least 7 days before the obser- vation date. Only females usually occupying the burrow, where they were fed, were taken into account. We made a total of 73 different pair observations, obtaining 34 interaction sequenc- es. No animal was observed more than once a day. Agonistic patterns of behavior were described (Femandez-Montraveta & Ortega 1990) from records of all the movements and activities of the animals during a minimum period of 30 min. Considering behavioral patterns as variables and individuals as cases, matrices were constructed in which the absolute frequencies (the number of times an individual exhibited a given behav- ioral pattern during the sequence) were repre- sented. The absolute frequency matrices were transformed into relative frequency ones, rep- resenting the proportion between the display of each behavioral pattern and the total number of elements of the sequence. In order to carry out the analysis, an arc-sine transformation was ap- plied to these resulting matrices. Matrices were analyzed by means of a bifac- torial analysis of variance, with the variables “previous occupation of the burrow” and “size” considered as the grouping factors. Two discrete levels were considered for each of these: “resi- dent/intruder” for the former and “larger/small- er” for the latter. The analysis was applied by means of the program 7D, belonging to the BMDP87 package. RESULTS We analyzed 68 behavioral sequences from both the resident females and the intruders. Ta- xable \.—F and R- values for differences in the mean frequencies of observed behavioral patterns relative to female size P < 0.05). and previous residence (* indicates Pattern Factor F P Motionless Residence 6.81 0.0114* Size 0.10 0.7531 Interaction 0.08 0.7738 Approach Residence 4.83 0.0317* Size 0.12 0.7358 Interaction 1.35 0.2509 Go away Residence 22.87 0.0000* Size 0.29 0.5936 Interaction O.OI 0.9083 Contact Residence 23.73 0.0000* Size 0.00 0.9882 Interaction 2.88 0.0965 Pounce Residence 36.39 0.0000* Size 1.02 0.3166 Interaction 0.66 0.4221 Palpal drum Residence 3.64 0.0641 Size 0.58 0.4501 Interaction 0.42 0.5199 Foreleg Residence 49.33 0.0000* extension Size 0.01 0.9392 Interaction 0.56 0.4567 Capture Residence 18.55 0.0001* Size 0.00 0.9440 Interaction 3.13 0.0832 Tangle Residence 16.00 0.0002* Size 0.07 0.7934 Interaction 1.15 0.2892 ble 1 shows the results from the application of the analysis. There is no statistical interaction between the factors of “previous occupation of the burrow” and “size” for any of the analyzed behavior patterns (Table 1). There are significant differences in the mean frequency of all the be- havioral patterns with regard to the factor of “previous residence,” regardless of size. F- values are less than 0.05 in all cases, except for the “palpal drumming” pattern. Figures 1 and 2 show the mean frequency of behavioral patterns for the variables of “previ- ous occupation of the burrow” and “size”. In- truder females more frequently use the patterns of “Motionless”, “Approach” and “Go away” (Fig. 1 ). On the other hand, resident females more frequently use the patterns of “Foreleg Contact”, “Pounce”, “Foreleg Extension Chelicerae Spreading”, (“Threat”), “Tangle” and “Cap- 82 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY MOTIONLESS APPROACH GO AWAY PATTERNS Figure 1. — Mean frequency of the behavior patterns more frequently shown by intruder females— “Motion- less”, “Approach” and “Go away”— with regard to relative size (S = smaller, L = larger) and previous occupation of the burrow (R = resident, I = intruder). PATTERNS Figure 2. — Mean frequency of using the behavior patterns more frequently shown by resident females— “Contact”, “Pounce”, “Palpal drumming”, “Foreleg extension and chelicerae spreading”, (“Threat”), “Capture” and “Tangle”— with regard to relative size (S = smaller, L = larger) and previous occupation of the burrow (R = resident, I = intruder). FERNANDEZ-MONTRAVETA & ORTEGA -OWNER-BIASED BEHAVIOR IN LYCOS A 83 ture” (Fig. 2). Mean frequency of “Palpal Drum- ming” is also greater among this group, but is not significantly different (Table 1). DISCUSSION From our results, a high degree of intraspecific variability in the agonistic behavior of adult fe- males of that spider species is obvious. When studying spider behavior, interspecific differ- ences have been emphasized (Hollander et al. 1973; Stratton & Uetz 1983; Suwa 1984) and a lesser degree of attention has been paid to in- traspecific variability (however, see Jackson 1 986; Kronestedt 1986; Riechert 1988). Our results in- dicate that differences shown by females of L. t. fasciiventris in their agonistic behavior may be related to their previous occupation of the bur- row but, in no case, to their relative size. If we consider that behavior patterns are or- dered according to their intensity-defined by the occurrence of contact (Glass & Huntingford 1988)— then behavior intensity seems to be greater for resident females than for the intruders in L. t. fasciiventris (Fig. 2). These latter tend to use to a greater extent those behavioral patterns of non-stereotyped approaching and retreating. Therefore, the behavior shown by resident fe- males seems to be associated with a higher cost (Riechert 1988). These results can be interpreted as if adult females of this species were using the conditional strategy of “attack if resident and retreat if intruder” (Maynard Smith 1 974) to set- tle the contests, regardless of their size difference. Since size may be thought of as a factor influ- encing individual winning ability, and it is be- lieved that animals exchange information about that factor (Parker 1974), it might be expected that spiders also adjust their behavior to their size differences. In our study, previous occupa- tion of the burrow was not associated with greater physical ability since maintenance conditions were the same for all individuals, both those used as residents and those used as intruders. We think that the female agonistic tactic is based essen- tially on their previous residence, and that the effect of size difference is related to the interac- tion duration. This interpretation fits the inverse relationship we found between interaction du- ration and size differences in these kinds of en- counters (Femandez-Montraveta & Ortega 1 990). We think, therefore, that our results fit the expectation that animals use an evaluator strat- egy to settle their agonistic interactions and ex- change accurate information about relative abil- ity to hold the resource. The factor of previously occupying the burrow apparently affects the as- sumption of behavior patterns with higher attack levels by resident females. This behavioral strat- egy should allow the contests to be readily settled for the resident female if size difference is not too small. Otherwise contest duration might be longer. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank S. E. Riechert and G. W. Uetz for reviewing this manuscript and especially for cor- recting style and usage. We also thank M. A. Ruiz for preparing the figures. REFERENCES CITED Buskirk, R. E. 1975. Aggressive display and orb-de- fence in a colonial spider, Metabus gravidus. Anim. Behav., 23:560-567. Femandez-Montraveta, C. & J. Ortega. 1990. El comportamiento agonistico de hembras adultas de Lycosa tarentula fasciiventris (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol., 18:49-58. Glass, C. W. & F. A. Huntingford. 1988. Initiation and resolution of fights between swimming crabs. Ethology, 77(3):237-249. Hammerstein, P. 1981. The role of asymmetries in animal contests. Anim. Behav., 29:193-205. Hodge, M. A. 1987. Agonistic interactions between female bowl and doily spiders (Araneae, Linyphi- idae): owner biased outcomes. J. Arachnol., 1 5:241- 247. Hollander, J. den, H. Dijkstra, H. Alleman & L. Vljim. 1973. Courtship behaviour as species barrier in the Pardosa pullata group (Araneae, Lycosidae). Tijdschrift. Ent., 116(l):l-22. Huntingford, F. & A. Turner. 1987. Animal Conflict. Champan & Hall, London. 448 pp. Jackson, R. R. 1986. Communal jumping spiders from Kenya: Intraspecific interactions, interspecific nest complexes and cohabitation with web-build- ing spiders. New Zealand J. Zool., 13:13-26. Kronestedt, T. 1986. Ethospecies. Behavioral pat- terns as an interspecific barrier. Actas X Congr. In- tern. AracnoL, Jaca/Espana, 11:41-45. Maynard Smith, J. 1974. The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. J. Theor. Biol., 47:209-221. Maynard Smith, J. & G. A. Parker. 1976. The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim. Behav., 24:159-175. Maynard Smith, J. & G. R. Price. 1973. The logic of animal conflicts. Nature, 246:15-18. Parker, G. A. 1 974. Assessment strategy and the evo- lution of fighting behaviour. J. Theor. Biol., 47:223- 243. 84 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Riechert, S. E. 1978. Games spiders play: I. Behav- ioral variability in territorial disputes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 3:135-162. Riechert, S. E. 1988. The energetic costs of fighting. Amer. ZooL, 28(3):877-884. Stratton, G. E. & G. W. Uetz. 1983. Communication via substratum-coupled stridulation and reproduc- tive isolation in wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). Anim. Behav., 31:164—172. Suwa, M. 1984. Courtship behaviour of three new forms in the wolf spider Pardosa laura complex. J. Ethol., 2:99-107. Manuscript received October 1989, revised June 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:85-87 A MITOCHONDRIAL DNA RESTRICTION ENZYME CLEAVAGE MAP FOR THE SCORPION HADRURUS ARIZONENSIS (lURIDAE) Deborah Roan Smith*: Insect Division and Laboratory for Molecular Systematics, Mu- seum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USA Wesley M. Brown: Laboratory for Molecular Systematics, Museum of Zoology and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USA Abstract. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) was prepared from a single individual of the scorpion Hadrurus arizonensis Ewing. The total size of the mitochondrial genome was estimated to be 13 850 to 14 000 base pairs. The mtDNA was surveyed for cleavage sites using 1 7 six-base restriction enzymes and three four-base enzymes. The technique of double digests was used to construct a map of the cleavage sites generated in this mtDNA by nine six-base restriction enzymes. We present a restriction enzyme cleavage map and information on the size and base composi- tion of the mitochondrial genome of the scorpion Hadrurus arizonensis Ewing (luridae). This is the first published restriction site map for an arach- nid mitochondrial genome. This map will be use- ful in systematic studies of Hadrurus and related scorpions, in studies which use mtDNA markers in the study of H. arizonensis population biology, and as a guide for cloning and sequencing the H. arizonensis mitochondrial genome. Excellent discussions of animal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and its use in systematics, biogeog- raphy and population biology can be found in Avise et al. (1987), Brown (1985) and Moritz et al. (1987). METHODS AND MATERIALS The scorpions used in this study were collected from Cochise Co., Arizona in June, 1989 by K. and D. Aiken, shipped live to the University of Michigan, and stored at -80° C. MtDNA was prepared from muscle tissue (tail, pedipalps) of one adult using the methods described in Smith and Brown ( 1 990). A second individual has been kept as a voucher specimen. The mtDNA was analyzed by digestion with restriction enzymes. ' Current address: Department of Entomology, Snow Hall, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 USA. Aliquots of the mtDNA were digested with the six-base and four-base restriction enzymes listed in Table 1, using bulfer and temperature con- ditions recommended by the manufacturers (Be- thesda Research Laboratories, Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals, International Biotech- nologies, and New England Biolabs). The re- sulting fragments were radioactively end-labeled with ^^P-deoxynucleotides and separated by elec- trophoresis on 1% agarose and 4% polyacryl- amide gels (Brown 1 980; Wright et al. 1 983) and visualized by autoradiography. The sizes of the DNA fragments were estimated by comparison with size standards (Hindlll and Aval/Bglll di- gests of wild-type lambda phage DNA and Haelll digests of phage phi-X 1 74 DNA) run on the same gels. The relative positions of restriction enzyme cleavage sites were mapped by means of double digests (Brown & Vinograd 1974). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The tissues from the tail and one pedipalp of one H. arizonensis yielded approximately 1.5 ng of mtDNA. The mitochondrial genome of H. arizonensis is small, approximately 13 850 to 14 000 base pairs (13.85 to 14.0 kilobase pairs or kb). Table 1 shows the number of cleavages generated by each restriction enzyme in H. ari- zonensis mtDNA. Figure 1 shows the relative positions of the cleavage sites generated by nine of the enzymes. 85 86 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1.— Six-base and four-base restriction endo- nucleases used in this survey, and the number of cleav- ages generated by each enzyme in the mitochondrial DNA of Hadrurus arizonensis. (A = adenine, T = thymine, C = cytosine, G = guanine, Py = any pyrimidine, Pu = any purine, N = any base.) Enzyme Recognition sequence(s) Number of recogni- tion sites AflII CTTAAG 1 Asel ATTAAT >10 Aval CPyCGPuG 0 BamHI GGATCC 1 Bell TGATCA 6 Cfol GCGC 0 Dral TTTAAA >10 EcoO109 PuGGNCCPy 1 EcoRI GAATTC 3 EcoT22I ATGCAT 1 Haelll GGCC 1 Hindi! GTPyPuAC 4 Hindlll AAGCTT 7 MspI CCGG 0 Ndel CATATG 2 PvuII CAGCTG 1 Sad GAGCTC 0 Spel ACTAGT 4 SspI AATATT >10 Xbal TCTAGA 0. These data suggest that the mtDNA of H. ar- izonensis, like that of insects such as Drosophila (e.g., Clary & Wolstenholme 1 985) and the honey bee {Apis mellifera L.; Crozier et al. 1 989) is rich in adenine (A) and thymine (T) and poor in gua- nine (G) and cytosine (C). Digestion with four- base enzymes whose recognition sites contain only cytosines and guanines, reveals one (Haelll) or no (Cfol, MspI) cleavage sites. At the other ex- treme, digestion with the 6-base enzymes Asel, Dral and SspI, whose recognition sites contain only A’s and T’s, revealed large numbers of cleavage sites. While most animal mtDNA’s fall in a rather narrow size range of 1 6 to 18 kb, the total known size range for animal mtDNA’s is from 39 kb in the scallop Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin) (Snyder etal. 1987) to 14.285 kb in the nematode Ascaris suum (Wolstenholme et al. 1 987). Nearly all animal mtDNA’s that have been investigated contain the same genes, coding for 22 transfer RNA’s, 13 proteins and two ribosomal RNA’s (Brown 1985; Moritz et al. 1987), plus a non- coding control region (the D-loop in vertebrates or AT-rich region of insects and other inverte- brates). Variation in the size of animal mtDNA’s is commonly due to variation in the size of the control region, which may contain a variable number of tandemly repeated sequences (e.g., Fauron and Wolstenholme 1980; Harrison et al. 1985; Densmore etal. 1985; Solignac etal. 1986) but may also be due to duplications in coding regions (e.g., Moritz & Brown 1986, 1987), or small tandem repeats, inserts and deletions scat- tered throughout the mitochondrial genome (e.g.. Powers et al. 1986). The unusually small mito- chondrial genome of the nematodes is lacking the ATPase 8 gene, and the tRNA’s have lost a Hadrurus arizonensis mitochondrial DNA 10 1 1 12 13 14 Kb H O Di "a >— cS a « ® ^ ■s I .s Z P3 ® r-* ‘-I Figure 1.— Cleavage map for mitochondrial DNA of the scorpion Hadrurus arizonensis, showing relative positions of the cleavages generated by the enzymes AflII, BamHI, EcoRI, EcoT22I, Hindll, Ndel, Pvull, and Spel. The single AflII site was arbitrarily chosen as the starting point for this linear map of the circular mtDNA molecule. Subsequent sequencing (Smith unpubl. data) shows that the Spel and EcoRI sites at approximately 13.35 kb are 7 base pairs apart, with the Spel site preceding the EcoRI site. The scale is in thousands of base pairs, or kilobase pairs (kb). SMITH & BROWN-SCORPION MITOCHONDRIAL DNA 87 stem and loop structure. (Wolstenholme et al. 1987). This raises the possibility that the unusu- ally small mitochondrial genome of H. arizo- w/25/5 (13.85-14.0 kb) is also lacking a gene typ- ically found in animal mtDNA. In this regard it is interesting that the mtDNA of other chelicer- ates, including the horseshoe crab, Limulus poly- phemus (L.) (Xiphosurida), vinegaroon, Masti- goproctus giganteus (Lucas) (Thelyphonida), and the spiders Anelosimus eximius (Keyserling) and A. studiosus (Hentz) (Araneae: Theridiidae), also have small mitochondrial genomes of 14-15 kb (Smith unpubl. obs.). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank R. Hagen, G. Polis and M. Galindo- Ramirez for comments on the manuscript, and G. Polis for help in identification of the scorpi- ons. This research was supported by NSF grant BSR-8709661 to DRS, a grant from the Smith- sonian Institute Scholarly Studies Program to J. Coddington and DRS, and NSF and NIH grants to WMB. LITERATURE CITED Avise,J.C., etal. 1987. Intraspecific phylogeography; The mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 18: 489-522. Brown, W. M. 1980. Polymorphisms in mitochon- drial DNA of humans as revealed by restriction en- donuclease analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 77: 3605-3609. Brown, W. M. 1985. The mitochondrial genome of animals. Pp. 95-130, In Molecular Evolutionary Genetics (R. J. MacIntyre, ed.). Plenum, New York. Brown, W. M. & J. Vinograd. 1974. Restriction en- donuclease cleavage maps of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 71:4617-4621. Clary, D. O., & D. R. Wolstenholme. 1985. The mi- tochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: Nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. J. Mol. Evol., 22:252-271. Crozier, R. H., Y. C. Crozier & A. G. MacKinlay. 1989. The CO-I and CO-II region of honey-bee mitochondrial DNA: Evidence for variation in in- sect mitochondrial evolutionary rates. Molec. Biol. Evol., 6:399-411. Densmore, L. D., J. W. Wright & W. M. Brown. 1985. Length variation and heteroplasmy are frequent in mitochondrial DNA from parthenogenetic and bi- sexual lizards (genus Cnemidophorus). Genetics, 1 1 0: 689-707. Fauron, C. & D. Wolstenholme. 1980. Intraspecific diversity of nucleotide sequences within the adenine + thymine-rich region of mitochondrial DNA mol- ecules of Drosophila mauritiana. Drosophila mela- nogaster and Drosophila simulans. Nucleic Acids Research, 8:5391-5410. Harrison, R., D. Rand & W. Wheeler. 1985. Mito- chondrial DNA size variation within individual crickets. Science, 228:1446-1448. Moritz, C. & W. M. Brown. 1986. Tandem dupli- cation of D-loop and ribosomal RNA sequences in lizard mitochondrial DNA. Science, 233:1425-1427. Moritz, C. & W. M. Brown. 1987. Tandem dupli- cations in animal mitochondrial DNAs: Variation in incidence and gene content among lizards. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84:7183-7187. Moritz, C., T. E. Dowling & W. M. Brown. 1987. Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: Rele- vance for population biology and systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 18:269-292. Powers, T. O., E. G. Platzer & B. C. Hyman. 1986. Large mitochondrial genome and mitochondrial DNA size polymorphism in the mosquito parasite, Romanomermis culicivorax. Curr. Genet., 11:71- 77. Smith, D. R. & W. M. Brown. 1990. Restriction en- donuclease cleavage site and length polymorphisms in mitochondrial DNA of Apix mellifera mellifera and A. m. carnica (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 83:81-88. Snyder, M., et al. 1989. Atypical mitochondrial DNA from the deep-seascallop Placopecten magellanicus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84:7595-7599. Solignac, M., M. Monnerot & J.-C. Mounolou. 1986. Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the melanogaster species subgroup of Drosophila. J. Mol. Evol., 23: 31^0. Wolstenholme, D. R., et al. 1987. Bizzare tRNAs inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial ge- nomes of nematode worms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84:1324-1328. Wright, J., C. Spolsky & W. M. Brown. 1983. The origin of the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus laredoensis inferred from mitochondrial DNA anal- ysis. Herpetologica, 39:410-416. Manuscript received May 1990, revised July 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:88-92 EREMOCHELIS LAGUNENSIS, ESPECIE NUEVA (ARACHNIDA, SOLPUGIDA, EREMOBATIDAE) DE BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR, MEXICO Ignacio M. Vazquez: Laboratorio de Acarologia, Laboratorio de Morfofisiologia Animal, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, 04510 DF, Mexico Abstract. Eremochelis lagunensis new species from Palo Extrano in Baja California Sur, Mexico, is described and illustrated. The structure of the fixed finger of the male cheiicerae of E. lagunensis looks like the fixed fingers of E. rossi Muma, 1986 but the fondal notch and mesoventral groove of the fixed finger as well as the dentition of the movable finger of E. lagunensis are different from that species. The females are similar to E. truncus. Resumen. Se describe e ilustra a Eremochelis lagunensis especie nueva de Palo Extrano, Baja California Sur, Mexico. La estructura del dedo fijo de los queliceros del macho de E. lagunensis es similar a la de E. rossi Muma 1986; sin embargo, en E. lagunensis el espacio de la muesca basal de los queliceros y el canal lateroventral del dedo fijo, asi como la denticion del dedo movil es diferente a lo que presenta aquella especie. Las hembras se parecen a las de E. truncus. Uno de los ordenes de aracnidos muy poco atendido por los aracnologos es el de los SoH- fugos, en parte por ser escasos en las colecciones y tambien por carecer de importancia medica y economica. Sin embargo, este grupo de animales, como otros, juega un papel ecologico relevante como depredadores de diferentes tipos de insec- tos y otros atropodos, incluso de vertebrados pe- quenos. Martin H. Muma, de Estados Unidos, dedico gran parte de su vida al estudio de los solifugos de America del Norte, incluyendo el norte de Mexico y las Antillas, describio un gran numero de taxa nuevos de estas regiones,y tra- bajo con aspectos de taxonomia (Muma 1951, 1962, 1970, 1985, 1986), biologia (Muma 1966) y ecologia (Muma 1980) de especies de las fa- milias Eremobatidae y Ammotrechidae. Otros especialistas ban publicado sus hallazgos acerca de solifugos mexicanos de las mismas familias (Rowland 1974; Vazquez 1981). El genero Eremochelis comprende veintiocho especies ubicadas en seis “grupos de especies”: arcus, bilobatus, branchi, andreasana, imperialis y striodorsalis (Rowland 1974). Son solifugos de talla mediana a pequena, alcanzando los 30 mm de largo. Hasta la fecha se ban colectado al sur de Estados Unidos en California, Nevada, Ari- zona y Texas. Al Norte de la Republica Mexicana se encontraron siete especies de este genero; en Sonora E. sonorae Muma 1987 y E. imperialis (Muma 1951); en Durango E. bilobatus Muma 1 95 1 ; en Baja California Norte y Sur E. flexacus (Muma 1963), E. truncus Muma 1987 y E. an- dreasana (Muma 1 962); y una especie en el vol- can Popocatepetl en el Estado de Mexico E. rossi Muma 1987. Habiendo estudiado un lote pequeno de ejem- plares provenientes de la Sierra y el Valle de la Laguna, Baja California Sur, el material ba re- sultado pertenecer a especies nuevas, una de las cuales se describe a continuacion. Las medicio- nes y el calculo de los radios se bicieron de la misma forma que Brookbart y Muma (1987) y Muma y Brookbart (1988), estan dados en mm y se anotan en las Tablas 1 y 2. La nomenclatura de los dientes basales “fondal teetb” de los que- liceros es como la usada por Muma (1951). Se utilizan las caracteristicas de las sedas ECCS (Muma 1985) y los radios o cocientes CL/CW (longitud/amplitud queliceral), PW/PL (ampli- tud/longitud del propeltidio) y A/CP (longitud de pedipalpos, patas I, patas IV/longitud de que- liceros y propeltidio) a manera de complemento de diagnosis y para bacer comparaciones en el caso de las bembras. Eremochelis lagunensis, especie nueva Figuras 1 a 10. Descripcion.— Holotipo macbo. Longitud to- tal = 16.5 mm. 88 YAZQUEL-EREMOCHELIS NUEVA DE MEXICO 89 Tabla 1.— Medidas de tres machos (un holotipo y dos paratipos) de Eremochelis lagunensis, especie nueva. Estructura Largo Ancho Radios Queliceros 3. 8-4.8 1. 3-1.6 CL/CW = 2.96 Propeltidio 1. 8-2.4 2.5-3. 1 PW/PL= 1.33 Pedipalpos 15.6-19.3 A/CP = 7.81 Patas I 10.0-13.4 Patas IV 18.6-23.1 Prosoma: Queliceros mas largos que los de otras especies del mismo genero (Tabla 1), con man- chas de color marron oscuro formando bandas longitudinales delgadas casi negras, el resto es de color amarillo palido. Complejo flagelar con la seda apical plumosa cilindrica, no alargada, con su extremo en forma de S (Fig. 5); sedas dorsales lisas y cilindricas. Denticion queliceral como se muestra en las figuras 1 y 2. Dedo fijo con dos rebordes en forma de dientes, bien distinguibles, sobre la orilla de un proceso laminar, formado por el ensanchamiento del canal lateroventral, el cual ocupa toda la parte ventral del dedo. Dicho proceso es concavo en su cara interna (Fig. 6). Con dos dientecillos en el espacio correspon- diente a la muesca basal “fondal notch” del dedo fijo. Hay cinco dientes basales extemos en orden decreciente de tamano I, II, IV, III, V (Fig. 1) y cuatro en la parte interna I, III, II, IV (Fig. 2). Dedo movil con cuatro dientes en orden decre- ciente de tamano como sigue: principal, anterior y dos intermedios. El diente anterior esta sepa- rado de los tres restantes por un espacio igual al que ocupan los dientes intermedios juntos (Fig. 1). Sedas basales extemas del dedo movil = ECCS (Muma 1985) como en la figura 10. Propeltidio tan ancho como largo (Tabla 1), con manchas oscuras a los lados de una banda media longi- tudinal color amarillo claro, desde el tuberculo ocular hasta el borde posterior. Las manchas os- curas en pedipalpos y patas van desde los fe- mures hasta los tarsos, excepto en las articula- ciones. Metatarsos de los pedipalpos con espinas gruesas impares, sin escopula. Con un par de unas en cada tarso del primer par de patas. Opistosoma: Color amarillo palido con los ter- guitos marron oscuro: primer estemito posestig- mal con un ctenidio (ctenidio = conjunto de se- das formando un peine) ventral con cinco o seis sedas gruesas (0.06 mm de ancho y 0.4 mm de largo), planas, de color amarillo oscuro casi ana- ranjado (Fig. 7). Paratipo hembra inmadura coloreada. Lon- gitud total =13.1 mm. Prosoma: Coloracion de las hembras estudia- das semejante a la del macho holotipo, excepto que en una de ellas los terguitos del opistosoma son de color claro uniforme. Denticion queliceral como se muestra en las figuras 3 y 4. Dedo fijo con dos dientes entre el anterior y el intermedio, asi como entre el intermedio y el principal (Fig. 3). Denticion basal interna en orden decreciente de tamano I, III, II (Fig. 4) y la externa I, II, III, IV (Fig. 3). Dedo movil con dos dientecillos, casi indistinguibles frente al diente anterior y dos pe- quenos rebordes (Figs. 3 y 4); con un diente pe- queno contiguo al principal, siendo el diente an- terior y el principal casi del mismo tamano. Sedas basales extemas del dedo movil (ECCS) como en las figuras 9 y 1 1 . Opistosoma: La forma de las placas genitales no se ve claramente, ya que se trata de hembras inmaduras; el esclerosamiento es poco y la co- loracion tambien, aunque la forma que presenta la hembra coloreada es como en la figura 8. La hembra de color claro no presenta los repliegues entre las placas genitales y las coxas IV como se ve en la figura 8. La delineacion de los hordes de las placas se efectuo por la diferencia de te- gumento, es decir, sobre las placas hay sedas y en el resto del estemito solo se ven pliegues. No hay ctenidio sobre el primer estemito posestig- mal. Localidad tipo: Valle de La Laguna, Baja Cal- ifornia Sur, MEXICO. Etimologfa: El nombre se refiere a la localidad, tanto al Valle como a la Sierra de La Laguna, que son los sitios donde se colectaron los ejem- plares. Material estudiado. — MEXICO: Tres machos y dos hembras. Un macho holotipo: Valle de La Laguna, Baja California Sur, 20 mayo 1988, M. Vazquez col., depositado en la coleccion 1. M. Vazquez, Mexico, D.F. (VM). Dos hembras in- maduras paratipos: Palo Extrano, Sierra de la Laguna, Baja California Sur, 14 mayo 1986, F. Cota y A. Cota col.; una hembra depositada en VM y la otra en el American Museum of Natural 90 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figuras \-\\.—Eremochelis lagunensis especie nueva, holotipo macho y paratipo hembra; 1, vista lateral externa del quellcero derecho del macho; 2, vista lateral interna del quelicero derecho del macho; 3, vista lateral externa del quelicero derecho de la hembra; 4, vista lateral interna del quelicero derecho de la hembra; 5, seda plumosa apical del complejo flagelar del macho holotipo; 6, vista ventral del dedo fijo del quelicero derecho del macho; 7, sedas del ctenidio opistosomal, sobre el primer segmento posestigmal; 8, esquema de las placas genitales de la hembra inmadura; 9, sedas ECCS de la hembra inmadura de color claro; 10, sedas ECCS del macho holotipo; 1 1, sedas ECCS de la hembra inmadura coloreada. NAZQ\5EZ-EREM0CHELIS NUEVA DE MEXICO 91 Tabla 2.— Medidas de dos hembras inmaduras (paratipos) de Eremochelis lagunensis, especie nueva. Estructura Largo Ancho Radios Queliceros 3. 1-3.2 1. 1-1.1 CL/CW = 2.86 Propeltidio 1.5-1. 5 2.2-2.4 PW/PL= 1.5 Pedipalpos 8. 1-8.7 A/CP = 5.6 Patas I 6.7-6.8 Patas IV 10.0-11.8 History (AMNH). Un macho paratipo: Palo Ex- trafio, Sierra de la Laguna, Baja California Sur, 5 mayo 1986, F. Cota y A. Cota col, depositado en AMNH. Un macho paratipo; Palo Extrano, Sierra de la Laguna, Baja California Sur, 4 mayo 1983, M. Vazquez col., depositado en VM. DISCUSION En Eremochelis lagunensis especie nueva, la seda apical plumosa del complejo flagelar no esta alargada y es cilindrica, las sedas dorsales son cih'ndricas lisas, caracteristico del genero. El ca- nal lateroventral es amplio y concavo, lo que hace que se relacione con las especies del grupo bilobatus. El dedo fijo de los queliceros del ma- cho de E. lagunensis es semejante al de E. rossi en la forma de la muesca lateroventral, difiere de esta por carecer de dientecillos en la muesca del fondo. El dedo movil de los machos de E. lagunensis es diferente al del macho holotipo de E. rossi por tener el diente anterior y un dien- tecillo intermedio bien distinguibles. Entre las especies del grupo bilobatus, solo E. rossi se pue- de considerar estrechamente relacionada con E. lagunensis. Las sedas ECCS de E. lagunensis son diferentes en numero y forma a las de E. rossi aunque, como lo dice Muma ( 1 985), este caracter debe ser probado ampliamente y no es definitivo en todos los casos si se considera por separado. Las hembras revisadas no son maduras y es dificil hacer comparaciones a nivel de placas ge- nitales. Sin embargo, al revisar las placas geni- tales de nuestros ejemplares, nos dimos cuenta que solo en la que tiene bien definido el color de los terguitos opistosomales, se distingue la forma similar a la hembra de E. bilobatus. Por otro lado, los queliceros de las hembras estudiadas son similares a los de la hembra de E. truncus, excepto que en esta hay un diente intermedio contiguo al principal y en nuestros ejemplares hay dos. En el dedo fijo de las hembras revisadas hay dos dientes detras del diente anterior y en la hembra de E. truncus solo hay uno. Es posible que nuestros ejemplares correspondan a hembras de diferente especie ya que las sedas ECCS son diferentes para cada hembra (ver Figs. 9 y 1 1 ) y son diferentes a las del macho holotipo. Sin em- bargo, puede ser que al manipular los queliceros se hayan roto las sedas pequenas. La forma de las placas genitales es muy parecida. Descarta- mos la posibilidad de que la hembra coloreada sea el estado juvenil de E. truncus y que el macho de la especie que aqui se describe sea sinonimo de tal especie, principalmente por las diferencias en talla y tambien por las diferencias en denticion queliceral. Sobre todo, la relacion entre longitud queliceral y longitud general del cuerpo puede distinguir a los machos y hembras de E. lagu- nensis, aqui descritos, de otras especies (Tablas 1 y 2). En todo caso, las hembras estudiadas pueden no corresponder a los machos descritos, pero se comprobo que ellas son del mismo genero y que se relacionan con las especies del grupo bilobatus, por la forma de su placa genital en vias de ser madura. AGRADECIMIENTOS Quiero- dedicar este trabajo a la memoria del Doctor Martin H. Muma, quien me enseno todo lo que se de solifugos y me animo en muchas ocasiones para publicar el resultado de mis in- vestigaciones. Por otra parte, agradezco el envio del material del presente estudio a las Doctoras Magdalena Vazquez y Maria Luisa Jimenez, co- misionadas por el Centro de Investigaciones Bio- logicas de Baja California Sur, A.C. para estudiar la fauna terrestre de la Sierra de la Laguna. LITERATURA CITADA Brookhart, J. O. & M. H. Muma. 1987. Arenotherus a new genus of Eremobatidae (Solpugida), in the United States. Domestic Publication. 1 8 pp. Muma, M. H. 1951. The arachnid order Solpugida in the United States. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 97:31-142. 92 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Muma, M. H. 1962. The arachnid order Solpugida in the United States, supplement 1. Amer. Mus. Novitates, 2092:1-44. Muma, M. H. 1966. Egg deposition and incubation in Eremobates durangonus with notes on the eggs of other species of Eremobatidae. Florida EntomoL, 49:23-31. Muma, M. H. 1970. A synoptic review of North American, Central American and West Indian Sol- pugida (Arthropoda: Arachnida). Arthropods of Florida and Neighboring Land Areas, 5:1-62. Muma, M. H. 1980. Solpugid (Arachnida) popula- tions in a creosotebush vs. a mixed plant associa- tion. Southwestern Naturalist (25), 2:129-136. Muma, M.H. 1985. A new, possibly diagnostic, char- acter for Solpugida (Arachnida). Novitates Arthro- podae, 2:1-4. Muma, M. H. 1986. New species and records of Sol- pugida (Arachnida) from Mexico, Central America and the West Indies. Novitates Arthropodae, 2(3): 1-23. Muma, M. H. & J. O. Brookhart. 1988. The Ere- mobates palpisetulosus species-group (Solpugida: Eremobatidae) in the United States. Cherry Creek School District, Colorado, USA. 65 pp. Rowland, J. M. 1974. A new solpugid of the genus Eremochelis (Arachnida: Solpugida: Eremobatidae) from California, with a key to males of the genus. Occas. Pap. Mus. Texas Tech Univ., 25:1-8. V^quez, I. M. 1981. Contribucion al Conocimiento de los Solifugos de Mexico (Arachnida: Solifugae). Tesis Profesional, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM. 80 pp. Manuscript received May 1990, revised August 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:93-96 NUEVOS APORTES AL GENERO PORRIMOSA ROEWER (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) Roberto M. Capocasale: Institute de Investigaciones Biologicas, Clemente Estable, Di vision Zoologia Experimental, Ave. Italia 3318, Montevideo, Uruguay Resumen. Se describen la hembra de Porrimosa harknessi (Chamberlin) y el macho de Porrimosa castanea (Mello-Leitao) hasta ahora desconocidos. Se da una clave de identifi- cacion nueva y se ampHa la distribucion de las tres especies seguras de Porrimosa. Abstract. The female of Porrimosa harknessi (Chamberlin) and the male of Porrimosa castanea (Mello-Leitao) still unknown are described. A key to identification and a wider distribution of the three good species of Porrimosa are given. Porrimosa es un genero que plan tea dudas y numerosas incognitas. Algunas de las causas que motivan esa situacion son: (a) el escaso numero de ejemplares disponibles en colecciones; (b) el alto porcentaje de especies descriptas como vMi- das pero basadas en ejemplares inmaduros; (c) las dificultades factuales para evaluar caracteres definitorios a niveles generico y especifico, de- bido al mal estado de conservacion de los “ti- pos”; (d) la ausencia casi total de informacion biologica y ecologica sobre las especies. Indudablemente Porrimosa es un grupo her- mano (“sister group”) de Sosippus (Dondale 1986). Lo poco que se conoce sobre la biologia de Porrimosa (Bucher 1974 en P. lagotis) y de Sosippus (Qr2id.y 1962, en^. texanus] Brach 1976 en S. floridanus) reafirma esa conclusion; ir mas lejos y establecer otras relaciones es solo es- peculacion. El objetivo de este articulo es comunicar los resultados obtenidos despues de consultar y es- tudiar el material prestado de casi la totalidad de las colecciones de America del Sur, que tienen ejemplares de Porrimosa. Estos aportes solo tie- nen la pretension de complementar mi estudio anterior (Capocasale 1982). Dado que la informacion sobre este genero es pobre, trate de aprovechar todo dato util recogi- do con la finalidad de neutralizar dicha carencia. Aqui se describen el macho de Porrimosa cas- tanea Mello-Leitao y la hembra de Porrimosa harknessi Chamberlin, hasta ahora desconoci- dos. Tomando como base ese material nuevo, hice un estudio comparativo de los escleritos pal- pales en cada una de las tres especies seguras; de donde surgio una clave de identificacion nueva. ahora mas completa que la dada en Capocasale (1982). Tambien se ampHa la distribucion geo- grafica de algunas especies, con 22 localidades nuevas, lo que permite comprobar que ni Por- rimosa castanea ni Porrimosa harknessi estan restringidas a algunas regiones como se suponia. Teniendo en mente el me todo de trabajo de Dondale (1986), quien establecio nuevas divi- siones a nivel de subfamilia en Lycosidae, en- fatizo la importancia de los escleritos palpales, fundamentalmente de las apofisis lateral del con- ductor y mediana del “tegulum,” como carac- teres para hacer una identificacion segura. Esto apoyado en la funcion de las mismas. Abreviaturas. — MZUSP, Museu de Zoologia, Universidad de Sao Paulo, Brasil; MNRJ, Museu Nacional de Rio de Janeiro, Brasil; MRCN, Mu- seu Riograndense de Ciencias Naturals, Porto Alegre, Brasil; MNHN, Museo Nacional de His- toria Natural de Montevideo, Uruguay. CLAVE DE ESPECIES HEMBRAS 1. Pieza transversa del “septum” aproximada- mente 3 veces mas ancha que larga. El centre donde intersectan ambas piezas septales convexo, abultado, con 2 proyecciones a ambos lados (Figs. 4-5). Espermatecas con forma de C, con tuberculos en el apice, or- ientadas hacia las areas laterales. Bolsas co- pulatorias bilobuladas castanea Pieza transversa del “septum” aproximada- mente 4 veces mas ancha que larga (Fig. 6) 2 2. Espermatecas semejantes a P. castanea. Bolsas copulatorias simples, con una protuberancia 93 94 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 1 Figura l.—Porrimosa lagotis (Holmberg) (Uruguay, Canelones, Marindia, MNHN). pequena, conica, cerca de los tubos copu- latorios (Fig. 7) harknessi Espermatecas semejantes as P. harknessi. Bol- sas copulatorias simples lagotis MACHOS 1 . Apofisis mediana del “tegulum” corta, conica, canaliculada. Apofisis lateral del conductor curva, diametro de la base ancho, terminada en punta roma (Fig. 8) castanea Apofisis mediana del “tegulum” alargada, can- aliculada 2 2. Apofisis lateral del conductor curva, alargada diametro de la base angosto, terminada en punta roma (Fig. 9) harknessi Apofisis lateral del conductor corta, muy cur- va, diametro de la base ancho, terminada en punta aguda (Fig. 10) lagotis Porrimosa castanea (Mello-Leitao, 1 942) Figs. 4-5, 8 Porrimosa castanea: Capocasale 1982:149. Macho.— Cuerpo: largo 14 mm. Cefalotorax: largo 7.3 mm, ancho 6.9 mm (1 ejemplar medi- do), bandas laterales castano naranja, bandas submarginales continuas, amarillo, 6 bandas ra- diales castano naranja, convergentes hacia el sur- co toracico, area ocular castano naranja. Ester- non: largo 3.5 mm, ancho 3.0 mm, castano palido. Dientes en el borde posterior intemo de los que- liceros: cantidad 3. Femur I: largo 1 1 mm. Femur 11: largo 10 mm. Femur III: largo 9.5 mm. Femur IV: largo 11.9 mm. Femures, patelas, tibias y basitarsos de patas I-IV castano naranja. Ab- domen: dorsal castano oscuro, areas laterales castano oscuro, ventral castano amarillo. El ab- domen insinua un levisimo diseno presunta- mente perdido por el tiempo durante el cual el animal estuvo en Hquido y por la tecnica de con- servacion usada. Apofisis mediana del “tegu- lum”: corta, conica, canaliculada (Fig. 8). Apofisis lateral del conductor: curva, diametro de la base ancho, terminada en punta roma (Fig. 8). CAPOCASALE-NUEVOS APORTES AL GENERO PORRIMOSA 95 2 3 Figuras 2-10.— 2, 3, esquemas mostrando donde se tomaron las medidas en el epigino (a = ancho; 1 = largo) y en la apofisis lateral del conductor (d = diametro de la base), respectivamente; 4, 5, epigino de Ponimosa castanea (Mello-Leitao) (Brasil, Sao Joao, Agua Preta, MNRJ); 4, vista ventral; 5, vista anterior; 6, 7, Porrimosa harknessi (Chamberlin) (Brasil, Riogrande do Sul, Passo Fundo, MRCN); 6, epigino (pt = pieza transversa de! “septum”); 7, espermatecas (e) y bolsas copulatorias (be); 8-10, apofisis lateral del conductor (al) y apofisis mediana del “tegulum” (am); 8, Porrimosa castanea-, 9, Porrimosa harknessi-, 10, Porrimosa lagotis. 96 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Distribudon.— Centro de Argentina, centro de Peru y sur de Brasil. Ejemplares examinados.— BRASIL: SaoJodo; Agua Preta, set. 1927, 1 macho, 1 hembra (MNRJ). ARGENTINA: Cdrdoba; Talumba (M. Biraben), 1 hembra (MNRJ). BRASIL: Goias; Rio Oliveira, 26 jun. 1942, 2 hembras (MNHN). Porrimosa harknessi (Chamberlin, 1916) Figs. 6, 7, 9 Porrimosa harknessi: Capocasale 1982:151. Hembra.— Cuerpo: largo 17 mm. Cefalotorax: largo 7 mm, ancho 5.3 mm (1 ejemplar medido), bandas laterales amarillo castaho, bandas sub- marginales contlnuas, amarillo, 6 bandas ra- diales castano oscuro convergentes hacia el cen- tro del surco toracico, area ocular castano negro. Estemon: largo: 3.5 mm, ancho 2.5 mm, castano. Dientes en el borde posterior intemo de los queli- ceros: cantidad 3. Femur I: largo 5.8 mm. Femur II: largo 5.7 mm. Femur III: largo 6.3 mm. Fe- mur IV: largo 7.3 mm. Femures, patelas, tibias y basitarsos de patas I-IV amarillo castano. Ab- domen: dorsal una banda mediana castano os- curo (el diseno muy semejante al de P. lagotis (Fig. 1), areas laterales castano gris, ventral el mismo tinte que el de las areas laterales. “Sep- tum”: pieza mediana corta, pieza transversa aproximadamente 3 veces mas ancha que larga (Fig. 6). Espermatecas: con forma de C, los apices orientados hacia las areas laterales. Bolsas co- pulatorias: simples, con una protuberancia pe- quena, conica, cerca de los tubos copulatorios (Fig. 7). Distribucion.— Sur de Brasil y sur de Peru. Ejemplares examinados. — BRASIL: Rio- grande do Sul, Passo Fundo, 12 oct. 1985 (A. Lise), 1 macho, 1 hembra, 2 hembras juveniles (MRCN). Porrimosa lagotis (Holmberg, 1876) Figs. 1, 10 Porrimosa lagotis: Capocasale 1982:151 (nec. P. la- gotis (Mello-Lehao, 1941)). Porrimosa lagotis: Platnick 1989:387. Distribucidn.— Centro de Argentina, centro y sur de Brasil y Uruguay. Localidades nuevas.— ARGENTINA: Rw Ne- gro-, Parana (MNRJ). BRASIL: Minas Gerais; Morro Garza (MZUSP), Ribeirao (MZUSP); Sao Paulo; Barnevi (MZUSP); Foz Itaquere (MZUSP); Franca (MZUSP); Rio Claro (MZUSP); Alto da Serra (MZUSP); Cananeia (MZUSP); Parana; Villa Velha (MZUSP); Goias. Cabeceiras (MZUSP); URUGUAY: Canelones; Las Piedras (MNHN); Maldonado. Aigua (MNHN), Sierra de las Animas (MNHN), Cerro San Antonio (MNHN), Cerro Largo; Rio Ta- cuari — ruta 8 (MNHN); Rivera; -ciudad- (MNHN); Treinta y Tres; Quebrada de los Cuer- vos (MNHN). AGRADECIMIENTOS A los Dres. H. W. Levi (MCZ), A. Lise (MRCN) y A. Timotheo Da Costa (MNRJ) por el pres- tamo de ejemplares, A. Brady y C. Valerio por sus comentarios y sugerencias en la revision del primer manuscrito, y a Exline-Frizzell Fund for Arachnological Research por financiar la publi- cation en The Journal of Arachnology (18:131- 141) de la primera parte de este estudio. BIBLIOGRAFIA CITADA Brach, V. 1976. Subsocial behavior in the funnel- web wolf spider Sosippus floridanus (Araneae, Ly- cosidae). The Florida Entomol., 59:225-229. Brady, A. 1962. The spider genus Sosippus in North America, Mexico, and Central America (Araneae, Lycosidae). Psyche, 69:129-164. Bucher, E. 1974. Observaciones ecol6gicas sobre ar- tropodos del bosque chaqueno de Tucuman. Rev. Fac. Ci. Ex. Fis. Nat. C6rdoba (N.S.). Biologia, 1: 35-122. Capocasale, R. M. 1982. Las especies del genero Po- rrimosa Roewer, 1959 (Araneae, Hippasinae). J. Arachnol., 10:145-156. Chamberlin, R. J. 1916. Results of the Yale Peruvian Expedition of 1911: The Arachnida. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, 60:177-299. Dondale, C. D. 1986. The subfamilies of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Actas X Congr. Int. Aracnol. Jaca, Espana, 1:327-332. Holmberg, E. L. 1876. Aracnidos argentinos. An. Agr. Argentina, 4:1-30. Mello-Leitao, C. 1 942. Cinco aranhas novas do Peru. Rev. Brasil. Biol., 2:429-434. Platnick, N. 1989. Advances in Spider Taxonomy, 1981-1987: A Supplement to Brignoli’s. A Cata- logue of the Araneae Described between 1 940 and 1981. Manchester Univ. Press, Oxford. Manuscript received March 1990, revised September 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:97-101 MOTHER OFFSPRING FOOD TRANSFER IN COELOTES TERRESTRIS {ARANEAE, AGELENIDAE) Jean-Luc Gundermann, Andre Horel and Chantal Roland: Laboratoire de Biologie du Comportement, Unite associee au CNRS, URA 1293, Universite de Nancy I, BP 239, 54506 Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy Cedex, France Abstract. Three different modes of maternal food supply have been reported in the sub- social agelenid species Coelotes terrestris: prey provisioning, consumption of the mother’s body, and regurgitation of nutritive fluids. Although the first two modes are well documented, the latter is not fully assessed. By comparing— in the absence of any prey— the weight variations in spiderlings either left with their mother or isolated, and by simultaneously comparing the weight variations of mothers, either isolated or left within the group of spiderlings, it was possible to see evidence of a significant and long-lasting food transfer from the mother to her progeny. This food transfer probably explains the high level of survivorship and reduction of cannibalism showed by broods left with their mothers. Close observation provided no direct evidence of mouth to mouth transfer. Rather, the food transfer appears to involve the production and emission of miniature eggs by the mother when in presence of spiderlings, a phenomenon which to date seems not to have been noted among spiders. Providing offspring with food is one of the most important features of parental care, in that it spares the young the many risks related to food supply (Wilson 1971). In spiders, food may be provided by the mother in various forms. The yolk contained in the egg ensures the beginning of the spiderling’s development during its life inside the egg sac and the few days following its emergence (Foelix 1982). This supply can be sup- plemented, in several species, by oophagy of non- hatched eggs inside the egg sac (Schick 1972; Valerio 1974). In a certain number of species, the mother provides food to a greater extent. Her body may be a usual, or occasional, resource for her progeny (Bristowe 1958; Cloudsley-Thomp- son 1955; Kullmann 1972; Seibt & Wickler 1987; Tahiri et al. 1989). Provisioning has also been reported, either in the form of prey items sub- dued by the mother and carried to the brood (Brach 1976; Hirschberg 1969; Gundermann et al. 1988; Tretzel 1961) or of fluids regurgitated to the spiderlings (Locket 1926; Kullmann & Zimmermann 1974). These fluids may be the result of the partial digestion of the prey, or sometimes, a production of the mother’s diges- tive tract (Nawabi, cited by Collatz 1987). We are currently studying the mother-young interactions related to food in a European sub- social species Coelotes terrestris (Wider) (KTafft et al. 1 986), in particular the three modes of food supply previously reported by T retzel (1961): prey provisioning (Gundermann et al. 1988), moth- er’s consumption (Gundermann 1989) and re- gurgitation. This last mode is poorly document- ed. Tretzel (1961) referred, for this species, to only one definite observation, and our own ob- servations are rare and dubious. Such a situation could be explained, either by the actual scarcity of the phenomenon— which would then lead to question its functional significance— or by its lo- calization during the nocturnal phase making the observations difficult. Thus, the very first step of the study, as exposed in the present paper, was to demonstrate the existence of a significant food transfer from the mother to her offspring, and to try and find out its nature. MATERIALS AND METHODS The funnel-web agelenid Coelotes terrestris is a terricolous spider common in European wood- lands. The female weaves a silken tube under stones, bark of dead logs, etc. From a lenticular egg sac, 40 to 60 spiderlings emerge, stay in a group inside the tube with their mother for about one month, and then disperse and lead a solitary life (Tretzel 1961; Gundermann 1989). 97 98 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Brood's size Figure 1.— Weekly variations of the broods’ sizes (median, quartiles). Open squares = treatment A{N = 1 7): orphaned brood; solid squares = treatment B (N = 1 7): brood left with mother. E.: Emergence day. Mann- Whitney [/-test: ns, non significant; *** P < 0.001. In the present study, field inseminated females were collected, then reared in the laboratory in plastic boxes (15 x 9 x 7.5 cm) with transparent sides and a bottom covered with a mixture of sand and peat which was regularly moistened. The rearing boxes were kept in a closed room, at a temperature of 2 1 °C ( ± 2 °), fluorescent lights providing a light of about 100 lux (12 L/1 2 D). Two experiments were designed: 1 — In the first experiment, it was hypothesized that if a food transfer did exist from the mother to her young, spiderlings left with their mother should present higher weights than orphaned spi- derlings, while mothers left with their young should present lower weights than isolated moth- ers. The experiment started from the broods’ emergence (most of them occurred within 2 weeks) and lasted 4 weeks. Throughout that time, all the spiders were deprived of prey. Egg sacs were randomly assigned to one of two treat- ments: —Treatment A (N = 17): mothers and young separated; —Treatment B {N = 17): mothers left with their young. Mothers and broods were weighed, first just after emergence, then at the end of each week. In order to minimize disturbance of the brood, each weighing was limited to a sample of 10 spiderlings collected, as randomly as possible, by aspiration using a pipette. The brood’s weight was estimated by multiplying the individual mean weight (given by the sampling) by the number of spiderlings still alive. At the end of the experi- ment some broods’ sizes fell below 10 individ- uals; in this case, of course, the totality of the brood was weighed. 2— The second experiment was designed to get further information by trying to enhance mother- young interactions. Ten groups of three day old spiderlings were separated from their mothers for 24 h without any food. The subsequent reunion of the mother with their young were thoroughly observed and videorecorded. RESULTS Survivorship.— Orphaned broods (treatment A) showed a very poor survivorship: at the end of the experiment, the median rate of survivor- ship (number of spiderlings still alive/initial size of the brood x 100) fell to 12.5% (quartiles: 6.3- 25.5) . In contrast, survivorship stayed high in treatment B (median rate: 8 1.8%, quartiles: 76.6- 88.5) . Actually the difference between the broods’ sizes of the two treatments was significant from the end of week 1 on (Fig. 1) (Mann- Whitney t/-test, P < 0.001). Direct observations and the fact that no dead bodies could be found in the vials lead to attribute this differential mortality to a high incidence of cannibalism within or- phaned broods. Weights’ variations.- Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between treat- ments A and B, on emergence day, for either the broods’ as well as the mothers’ weight (Mann- Whitney U-test, ns). From the end of week 1 on, the estimated weights of the broods left with their mothers were significantly higher than those of the orphaned broods (Fig. 2a). The analysis of weights’ weekly variations within each treatment (Table 1) shows that, while orphaned broods’ weights (treatment A) decreased (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed- rank test: P < 0.002 for weeks 2 and 3; P < 0.00 1 for week 4), weights of broods left with their mothers (treatment B) varied in the op- posite direction (Wilcoxon test: P < 0.002 for weeks 1 and 2, ns for week 3, P < 0.02 for week 4). The decrease in weight observed in treatment A can be accounted for by basal metabolism and, probably, by losses of material and energy brought about by high intrabrood cannibalism. On the GUNDERMANN ET AL.- MATERNAL FOOD TRANSFER 99 Broods weight (mg) Mother’s weight (mg) Weeks Figure 2. —Weekly weight variations in mg (median, quartiles). Open squares = treatment A (N = 17): or- phaned brood; solid squares = treatment B (A = 1 7): brood left with mother. E.: Emergence day. Mann- Whitney D-test: * P < 0.0 1 ; *** P < 0.00 1 . a = Brood’s weight variations; b = Mother’s weight variations. other hand the low level of cannibalism in treat- ment B cannot explain the increase in weight observed in this treatment. Rather, the increase suggests that some sort of food is provided to the young by their mother. This is confirmed by the study of the mothers’ weight variations (Fig. 2b). From the end of week 2, treatment B mothers were significantly lighter than treatment A mothers. Furthermore, the comparison of the weekly losses in weight be- tween treatment A and treatment B (Table 2) shows that, when left with their broods, the mothers suffered significantly more severe weight decrease than when isolated. Modes of mother- young food transfer.— The maintenance of weight gain in broods left with their mothers over four weeks strongly suggested that the foods transfer should be a relatively long- lasting phenomenon. It was, thus, very unlikely to consist of mere regurgitation of fluids extract- ed from the prey eaten by the mother before the beginning of the experiment. The transferred food should, then, be produced by the mother herself Close examination of rearing boxes, using a stereomicroscope, showed, at times, spiderlings eating substances deposited on the web. These substances consisted of either clear yellow drops of liquid, or brownish compact clusters of more or less discernible eggs. The egg sizes varied greatly, but were always smaller (0.3-0. 5 mm) than the normal ones (0.7-1 mm). Some of the egg-clusters were covered with a thin layer of silk, similar to the internal layer of the egg sacs. The second experiment was aimed at directly observing the possible mother-young food trans- fer. Actually, the reunion of the mothers with their young after a 24-h separation did not induce any special reactions other than an intensive weaving activity of the mothers, except in one group in which the young, unlike the others, dis- Table 1.— Variations of the broods’ median weights per week, in mg (range), within each treatment. Treatment A {N = 17): orphaned brood; treatment B (V= 17): brood left with mother. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed- rank test. Treatment Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Treatment A -2.2 -11.9 -8.6 -2.8 Mothers isolated (-47.3; +21.9) (-32.7; +12.3) (-29.2; +3.5) (-23.4; +1.0) P value 2-tailed ns <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 Treatment B + 19.2 + 18.9 + 7.0 + 5.3 Mothers with broods (-6.7; +71.9) (-4.3; +72.1) (-25.4; +38.3) (-9.6; +31.6) P value 2-tailed <0.002 <0.002 ns (0.02) 100 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 2.— Mothers’ median weight losses per week, in mg (range). Treatment A {N = 17): mother separated from brood; treatment B (A = 1 7): mother left with brood. Comparison treatment A vs. treatment B for each week: Mann-Whitney [/-test. Treatment Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Treatment A -6.8 -4.7 -1.8 -2.5 Mothers isolated (-3.4; -10.6) (0.9; -8.3) (-0.3; -4.5) T 1 oo Treatment B -21.3 -24.1 -11.5 -6.0 Mothers with broods (-5.9; -36.8) (-15.0; -26.6) (-7.0; -18.2) (-3.7; -10.1) P value 2-tailed <0.02 <0.001 <0.001 <0.05 played a high level of activity and interacted fre- quently with their mother. In this group, from the beginning, a few spi- derlings followed their mother in her numerous movements and made attempts to come into contact with her, mainly in the direction of her hind-legs and opisthosoma (one of them was even observed hanging from a spinneret). About 2 h 30 min after the reunion, the first emission of substances took place with two more emissions being recorded within the following 10 min. As soon as the drops of substance were deposited on the substratum they immediately attracted groups of two or three spiderlings. During the last emission the orientation of the mother’s opisthosoma made it possible to clearly observe the progressive exuding of substance from the vaginal opening. A spiderling, which had suc- ceeded in climbing on to the opisthosoma, came to the vaginal opening, seized the small ball of substance and eventually took it away. CONCLUSION In Coelotes (errestris food is actually trans- ferred from the mother to her young. This trans- fer occurs when no prey are available, even for several weeks, thus indicating that food is pro- duced by the mother herself. Even though the digestive tract can not be definitely ruled out as a site of production, the ovaries appear to be playing a major role by producing miniature tro- phic eggs. Observations showed that these eggs are particularly attractive to the young and rap- idly eaten. This might explain why they had not been noticed before. Such a transfer of food is likely to enhance survivorship of young during food shortage in field conditions, at the expense of the mother’s own survivorship. But the adaptive significance of this phenomenon remains to be more precisely assessed; some incidental observations suggest that food transfer could also occur in normally fed groups. Further investigations are also required to find out the mechanisms involved in the process. To what extent is ovarian production continuous? Is ovarian physiology influenced by the presence of the brood? Does tactile (or other) stimulation of the mother by the spiderlings release the emis- sion of ovarian substance, as suggested by our observations? As far as we know, this mode of maternal feed- ing has never been previously reported in spi- ders, but can be related to a somewhat similar phenomenon described in the cricket Anuw- gryllus muticus (West & Alexander 1 963). In this sub-social insect, after interactions between the nymphs and their mother (recalling those ob- served in Coelotes terrestris), the nymphs are provided with miniature eggs, that the authors liken to the trophic eggs of ants (Brian 1953; Wilson 1971). Actually, another mode of ma- ternal feeding, not unlike what is here reported in Coelotes terrestris, has recently been observed in our laboratory (Tahiri et al. 1989). In two species of the genus Amaurobius, A. ferox and A. fenestralis, about 3 days after the emergence of the offsprings, the mother lays an egg mass de- prived of any silken envelope which is imme- diately eaten by the spiderlings. This egg-laying appears to be systematic and to represent the only source of food for the young during the first ten post-emergence days. These findings, togeth- er with those of spiderlings feeding on eggs inside the egg sac (Schick 1972; Valerio 1974), suggest that egg cannibalism could play a significant role in the reproductive strategies of many spider spe- cies (see Polis 1981). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We express our thanks to H. Gouth, D. Assi and D. Moncotel for their assistance in this re- GUNDERMANN ET AL.- MATERNAL FOOD TRANSFER 101 search. We are grateful to A. L. Rypstra and G. W. Uetz for their criticism and advice on the manuscript. REFERENCES CITED Brach, V. 1976. Subsocial behavior in the funnel- web wolf spider Sosippus floridanus (Araneae; Ly- cosidae). Florida EntomoL, 59:225-229. Brian, V. 1953. Oviposition by workers of the ant Myrmica. Physiol. Comp. OecoL, 3:26-35. Bristowe, W. S. 1958. The World of Spiders. Collins, London. Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L. 1955. The life histories of the British cribellate spiders of the genus Ciniflo Bl. (Dyctinidae). Ann. Mag. Natur. Hist., 12:787- 794. Collatz, K. G. 1987. Structure and function of the digestive tract. Pp 229-238, In Ecophysiology of Spiders (N. Nentwig ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Foelix, R. F. 1982. Biology of Spiders. Harvard Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Gundermann, J. L. 1989. Etudes sur le comporte- mente matemel et son implication dans les pheno- menes sub-sociaux chez Faraignee Coelotes terrestris (Wider). PhD, Universite Nancy I. Gundermann, J. L., A. Horel & B. Krafft. 1988. Ma- ternal food-supply and its regulation in Coelotes ter- restris {Arme&e, Agelenidae). Behaviour, 107:278- 296. Hirschberg, D. 1969. Beitrage zur Biologic, insbe- sondere zur Brutpflege einiger Theridiiden. Z. wiss. Biol., 179:189-252. Krafft, B., A. Horel & J. M. Julita. 1986. Influence of food-supply on the duration of the gregarious phase of a maternal-social spider Coelotes terrestris (Araneae, Agelenidae). J. ArachnoL, 14:219-226. Kullmann, E. J. 1972. Evolution of social behavior in spiders (Araneae; Eresidae and Theridiidae). Am. Zool., 12:419-426. Kullmann, E. J. & W. Zimmermann. 1974. Regur- gitationfiitterungen als Bestandteil fur Brutfiirsorge bei Haubennetz und Rohrenspinnen (Araneae, Theridiidae und Eresidae). Proc. 6’" Intern. Arachn. Cong., pp. 120-124. Locket, G. H. 1 926. Observations on the mating hab- its of some web-spinning spiders. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pp. 1125-1146. Polis, G. A. 1 984. Intraspecific predation and “infant killing” among invertebrates. Pp 87-104, In Infan- ticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives (G. Hausfater & S. B. Hrdy, eds.). Aldine, New- York. Schick, R. X. 1972. The early instars, larval feeding and the significance of larval feeding in the crab spider genus Misumenops (Araneidae, Thomisidae). Notes Arachnol.Southwest., 3:12-19. Seibt, U. & W. Wickler. 1987. Gerontophagy versus cannibalism in the social spider Stegodyphus mi- mosarum Paresi and Stegodyphus dumicola Pocock. Anim. Behav., 35:1903-1904. Tahiri, A., A. Horel & B. Krafft. 1989. Etude preli- minaire sur les interactions mere-jeunes chez deux espdces d'Amaurobius (Araneae, Amaurobiidae). Rev. ArachnoL, 8:1 15-128. Tretzel, E. 1961. Biologic, Oekologie und Brutpflege von Coelotes terrestris (Wider) (Araneae, Ageleni- dae). II Brutpflege. Z. Morph. Oekol. Tiere, 50:375- 542. Valerio, C. E. 1974. Feeding on eggs by spiderlings of Achaearanea tepidariorum (Araneae, Theridi- idae), and the significance of the quiescent instar in spiders. J. ArachnoL, 2:57-63. West, M. J. and R. D. Alexander. 1963. Sub-social behavior in a burrowing cricket, Anurogryllus mu- ticus (De Geer). Ohio J. Science, 63:19-24. Wilson, E. O. 1971. The Insect Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Manuscript received November 1989, revised Septem- ber 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:102-104 ON THE SPIDER GENUS FEDOTOVIA (ARANEAE, GNAPHOSIDAE) Vladimir 1. Ovtsharenko; Zoological Institute, Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaja emb. 1, Leningrad 199034 USSR Norman I. Platnick: Department of Entomology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024 USA Abstract. Fedotovia Charitonov is removed from the synonymy of the laroniine genus Eilica and placed as a valid member of the subfamily Gnaphosinae. Males of the type species, F. uzbekistanica Charitonov, are described for the first time, and the species is newly recorded from Kazakhstan and Mongolia. The spider genus Fedotovia was established by Charitonov (1946) for a single female from Ish- kent, Uzbekistan, described as F. uzbekistanica. In his original description, Charitonov provided no comments on the possible relationships or subfamilial placement of Fedotovia, but later (Charitonov 1969) he placed the genus in the “Gnaphoseae,” comparing it with Asemesthes Simon and Gnaphosoides Hogg. The latter name was synonymized with the laroniine gnaphosid genus Eilica Keyserling by Platnick (1975); Plat- nick and Shadab (1981) subsequently placed Fe- dotovia as a synonym of Eilica as well. That syn- onymy, however, was not based on an examination of the type specimen, but only on figures of the eye pattern and epigynum of F. uzbekistanica provided by Charitonov (1946). We have recently had the opportunity to ex- amine Charitonov’s type, as well as newly col- lected specimens, which indicate that despite the numerous striking epigynal similarities with Ei- lica (including the shape of the lateral epigynal margins, the twisted posterior epigynal ducts, and the coiled median epigynal ducts), Fedotovia is neither a synonym of Eilica nor a member of the Laroniinae. It lacks the retromarginal cheliceral laminae characteristic of that subfamily and has instead the retromarginal serrated keel charac- teristic of the subfamily Gnaphosinae. Males, newly described here, have an elaborate palpal embolus unlike those of previously described gnaphosine genera, and we therefore consider dotovia a valid genus of the Gnaphosinae. The removal of Fedotovia from the list of ge- neric synonyms of Eilica (which thus includes only Baeriella Simon, Caridrassus Bryant, Gna- phosoides Hogg, Gytha Keyserling, and Laronia Simon) returns the distribution of Eilica to a more normal Gondwanan pattern, including only species from Africa, India, Australia, and south- ern parts of the Americas. The format of the descriptions and abbrevia- tions used follow those of Platnick and Shadab (1975); all measurements are in mm. Fedotovia Charitonov Fedotovia Charitonov, 1946:24 (type species by orig- inal designation Fedotovia uzbekistanica Charito- nov, 1946); Charitonov, 1969:98. Eilica: Platnick and Shadab, 1981:184 (in part). Diagnosis.— Specimens of Fedotovia resemble those of the African gnaphosine genus Ase- mesthes in having a strongly recurved posterior eye row, and median eyes that are much smaller than the lateral pairs, and will therefore key out to Asemesthes in the key by Dalmas (1921). Males can be distinguished from those of Asemesthes by the shorter tibial apophysis and the greatly elongated embolus (Figs. 1-3), females by the median epigynal scape (Fig. 4). Description.— Total length 5 — 7. Carapace al- most triangular in dorsal view, widest between coxae II and III, flattened, smoothly narrowed opposite palpal insertions, light brown with darkened posterior margin and rows of stiff setae radiating from thoracic groove. Cephalic area not elevated, thoracic groove short, straight, longi- tudinal. From front, anterior eye row straight, posterior row recurved; from above, anterior row 102 OVTSHARENKO & PLATNICK-F££><9rOF/^ (GNAPHOSIDAE) 103 Figures 1-5. —Fedotovia uzbekistanica Charitonov; 1, left male palp, prolateral view; 2 same, ventral view; 3, same, retrolateral view; 4, epigynum, ventral view; 5, same, dorsal view. slightly recurved, posterior row strongly re- curved. PME flattened, irregularly triangular, AME circular, ALE and PLE oval; PME and AME subequal, much smaller than lateral eyes; PME separated by less than their diameter, by more than their diameter from PLE; AME sep- arated by about their diameter, about as far from ALE; MOQ slightly wider in back than in front, longer than wide. Clypeal height roughly equal to ALE width. Chelicerae with serrated keel on retromargin bearing four or five teeth; promargin with two closely set teeth. Endites obliquely de- pressed, distally rounded but not as convergent as in Gnaphosa, with anterolateral serrula. La- bium long, extending two-thirds of endite length. Sternum light brown with darkened, rebordered margins and tiny sclerotized extensions to and between coxae. Leg formula 4123. Legs light brown, bearing numerous spines. Tarsi with two elongate claws dentate only at their base, without claw tufts; tarsi and distal portions of metatarsi I and II with thick, dark scopula; metatarsi with- out preening combs; trochanters unnotched. Ab- domen grayish brown, males with small, shiny, triangular anterior scutum. Six spinnerets; an- terior laterals with six or seven long piriform gland spigots set posteriorly from major ampul- late gland spigots; posterior medians short, tu- bular in males but widened and reflexed ante- riorly in females. Male palp with short tibial apophysis shifted dorsally, strong, distally hook- shaped median apophysis, and elaborately coil- ing embolus. Epigynum with pair of longitudinal lateral margins and median scape; epigynal ducts twisted, transversely oriented along posterior epigynal margin, in large circular coils medially. Distribution. —Known only from arid habitats in the USSR (Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan) and Mongolia. Fedotovia uzbekistanica Charitonov Figs. 1-5 Fedotovia uzbekistanica Chanionov, 1946:24, figs. 31, 32 (female holotype from Ishkent, Uzbekistan, USSR, 104 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY in University of Perm, examined); Charitonov, 1969: 98. Diagnosis.— With the characters of the genus and genitalia as in Figures 1-5. Male.— Total length 6.1 1. Carapace 2.81 long, 2.18 wide. Femur II 2.10 long. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.05, ALE 0.14, PME 0.12, PLE 0.17; AME-AME 0.12, AME-ALE 0.05, PME-PME 0.06, PME-PLE 0. 1 1 , ALE-PLE 0.13; MOQ length 0.33, front width 0.22, back width 0.30. Leg spination (only surfaces bearing spines listed): femora: I, II dl-1-0, pO-M; III, IVdl- 1-0, pO-M, rO-1-1; patellae III, IV pO-1-0, rO- 1- 0; tibiae: I v2-2-2; II pO-0-1, vlr-2-2; III dl- 0-0, p2-l-l, V2-2-2, r2-l-l; IV dl-0-1, p2-l-l, v2-2-2, r2-l-l; metatarsi: I, II v2-0-0; III dl-0- 0, pl-2-2, V2-2-2, rl-1-2; IV dl-0-0, pl-2-2, v2- lp-2, r 1-2-2. Palpal embolus originating basally, extending over retrolateral surface of cymbium, curling back to ventral surface of bulb distally (Figs. 1-3). Female.— Total length 5.67. Carapace 2.44 long, 2.03 wide. Femur II 1.75 long. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.08, ALE 0.17, PME 0.12, PLE 0.13; AME-AME 0.10, AME-ALE 0.04, PME-PME 0.03, PME-PLE 0. 1 3, ALE-PLE 0.09; MOQ length 0.30, front width 0.26, back width 0.27. Leg spination as in male, except as noted: patellae III, IV pO-0-0; tibiae: II pO-0-0; III pi- 1-1; IV dl-0-0; metatarsus III dO-0-0, pO- 2- 2. Median epigynal scape situated between lat- eral epigynal margins (Fig. 4); epigynal ducts ir- regularly twisted posteriorly, coiled medially (Fig. 5). Specimens examined (in Zoological Institute, Leningrad, unless otherwise indicated).— USSR: Kazakhstan: Chimkentskaya: Aksumbe, Kara- tau Mountains, Suzakskii region, 16 June 1989 (A. A. Zyuzin), 5 females. Gurievskaya: Baskar- gan Steppe, Ustyurt Plateau, Ustyurt Reserva- tion, 15-28 May 1989 (A. A. Raikhanov, S. I. Ibraev), 2 males, 6 females. Kzil-Orda: Dzhu- samly, Karmakchinskii region, clay desert, 19 June 1989 (A. A. Zyuzin), 1 female. Uzbekistan; Yakkabag: Ishkent, elev. 1 100-1300 m, 26 June 1942 (D. M. Fedotov), 1 female (holotype. Uni- versity of Perm). MONGOLIA: Bayan Khongor Aimak; Ekhingol, 30 Aug. 1977 (K. Monkhbay- ar), 1 female. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The work reported on here was done while the second author was a guest of the Zoological In- stitute, Akademia Nauk, Leningrad, and that support is greatly appreciated. We thank A. S. Utochkin and N. M. Pakhorukov of the Uni- versity of Perm for access to type material, and M. U. Shadab of the American Museum of Nat- ural History for assistance with illustrations. LITERATURE CITED Charitonov, D. E. 1946. New forms of spiders of the USSR. Izv. Est.-Nauchn. Inst. Molotovsk. Univ., 12:19-32. Charitonov, D. E. 1969. Material’i k faune paukov SSR. Uchel. Zap. Permsk. Ord. Trudy. ICrasn. Znam. Gos. Univ. Ime A. M. Gorkogo, 179:59-133. Dalmas, R. de. 1921. Monographic des araignees de la section des Pterotricha (Aran. Gnaphosidae). Ann. Soc. Entomol. France, 89:233-328. Platnick, N. I. 1975. A revision of the spider genus Eilica (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). Amer. Mus. Novi- tates, 2578:1-19. Platnick, N. 1. & M. U. Shadab. 1975. A revision of the spider genus Gnaphosa (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) in America. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 155:1-66. Platnick, N. I. & M. U. Shadab. 1981. On the spider genus Eilica (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 170:183-188. Manuscript received August 1990, revised October 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:105-1 10 THE LIFE HISTORY OF EUSCORPIUS FLAVICAUDIS (SCORPIONES, CHACTIDAE) T. G. Benton: Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing St., Cam- bridge, CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom Abstract. The life-history of an English population of the scorpion, Euscorpius flavi- caudis, was studied using morphometric measures of over 300 specimens. The study hy- pothesizes seven instars. Evidence strongly suggests that there are two instars of adults: some males and females mature at the sixth instar and some at the seventh. Larger scorpions may have a higher per-season reproductive success but may have fewer reproductive seasons owing to the extra time needed to mature. Studies of scorpion life-histories face several major difficulties. Firstly, scorpions are relatively long-lived compared to other terrestrial arthro- pods. For example, the Australian scorpion Uro- dacus yaschenkoi (Birula) grows to maturity in four years and may live an additional six (Short- house & Marples 1982). Secondly, scorpions can be very difficult to rear in the laboratory, often suffering high mortality at molting (Francke & Sissom 1984; Williams 1987; pers. obs.). Addi- tionally, laboratory conditions may differ suffi- ciently from those in the field to produce inac- curate data. For example, Smith (1966) found that the duration of the first instar of U. mani- catus (Thorell) was strongly influenced by the temperature at which the animals were main- tained. Field studies of scorpion life-history can be equally problematical, as marked individuals lose their marks with each molt. Many studies have resorted to estimating the number of instars from measurements of many specimens taken in the field (Polls & Sissom 1990). This method is approximate, but allows the tentative calculation of the life-history pa- rameters of the scorpion under study. The chactid scorpion, Euscorpius flavicaudis (de Geer) is a widespread southern European spe- cies that has successfully colonized a port in southern England. This colony at Sheemess, Kent (5 1°26'N: 0°45'E), has existed for about 1 20 years (Benton in press a). Over a two year period the ecology and behavioral ecology of this species was studied (Benton 1 990) and enough data were collected to allow investigation of the life-history of E. flavicaudis. The prime purpose of this paper is to present data which strongly suggest that there is more than one instar of sexually mature adult in this population. The concurrent studies allow, for the first time, the evolutionary signif- icance of a scorpion life-history polymorphism to be discussed. METHODS Between September 1987 and September 1989, a total of 3 1 7 specimens of Euscorpius flavicaudis were measured. Two methods of measuring were used: (1) 208 live animals were measured in the laboratory using a binocular microscope with op- tical micrometer, and (2) 109 animals were mea- sured in the field using dial calipers accurate to 0.1 mm. These latter scorpions were subdued mechanically by using a modified 50 ml syringe. The nozzle end was replaced by a fine nylon mesh and the plunger was sheathed in cotton-wool. Scorpions were placed in the barrel of the syringe and pressed against the mesh. A small hole was cut through the mesh to allow a pedipalp to be pulled out. Thus immobilized, the pedipalp could be measured quickly and accurately without damaging the animal. Most of the scorpions measured were adults or sub-adults {N = 287). Measurements made were: length and width of pedipalpal chela, length of prosoma (taken along midline), width of ster- nite V, weight and approximate whole-body length. In some analyses, the two measures of chela size were combined as the Chela-size Index (CSI). CSI is used in preference to chela length alone, as the ecological importance of chela size is most likely related to their strength (Benton in press b) and therefore volume. This is better approximated by the CSI. 105 106 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 1.— A log-log bivariate morphometric plot, showing the 5 juvenile instars in the scorpion, Eus- corpiusjlavicaudis(N= 163). Instars determined either by morphological differences (e.g., first and second in- stars) or cluster statistics (adults and fifth instars). White squares = first instar; black squares = second; cross = fourth; black triangle = fifth; white circle = adult fe- males; black circle = adult males. Regression equation of this relationship (including all instars other than 1 st): 3;= 1.139X - 0.079, = 0.974, A = 155. The apparent objectivity of using cluster sta- tistics in taxonomy has been frequently criticized (e.g., Ridley 1986), so in my analyses I only use cluster statistics to clump data when the number of clusters has been determined, or hypothesized, by some other method. The method of clustering was to use “average neighbor distance” (see No- rusis 1985) using the package SPSSx (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL 60611). As two different methods of measuring the scorpions were used, it is likely that their associatied errors were different. Due to this, in each analysis, care was taken to use only those scorpions that had been measured us- ing the same method. RESULTS Number of juvenile instars.— The bivariate morphometric plot of prosomal carapace length vs. width of the stemite on mesosomal segment V, using all available data, reveals four clumps of scorpions other than the adults (Fig. 1). These clumps correspond to the first, second, fourth and fifth instars. No third instars were measured as a result of sampling error. Progression factors for the juvenile molts were calculated (Table 1), assuming that the third instar would clump mid- way between the second and fourth. Data are only available on the masses of the first and sec- ond instars: 0.0084 ± 0.0025 g {N = 10) and 0.0070 ± 0.0013 g (iV = 5) respectively. The Figure 2.— Relationship between chela-size index (CSI = length of chela x width) and prosoma length in adult males. Data have been separated into two instars (see text), sixth (circles) and seventh (squares). Regression line fits the relationship in the sixth instar: seventh instar males have allometrically larger chelae. Regression line: y = I2.9x - 37.1, = 0.88. Males known to have deposited a spermatophore (filled sym- bols) occur in both instars. reduction in mass between the first and second instar is due to the mass of the exuvium. Number of adult male instars.— Sexually ma- ture males can be distinguished on the basis of two secondary sexual characteristics: the posses- sion of a notch in the pedipalpal fingers and their relatively longer pectines. The size-range of these adult males is large. However, the largest male and the second smallest deposited spermato- phores, confirming their sexual maturity (Fig. 2). During the course of field observations it be- came apparent that a dimorphism in the size of the pedipalpal chelae of adult males existed. Some males had chelae comparable in size to adult females; whereas others had disproportionately large chelae (mean adult male CSI = 42.5 ± 9.2 mm^, range 24.3-66.6, N = 113; mean adult fe- male CSI = 33.6 ± 7.3 mm^, range 18.6-51.4, N = 78). To investigate this apparent dimor- phism, the frequency distribution of chela lengths was compared to the expected normal distribu- tion. The observed distribution of chela sizes dif- fers significantly from normal (x^ = 21.1, df= 7, P < 0.001; x^ test of normality, Zar 1984:89) (Fig. 3). The distribution is, in fact, bimodal, indicating the population of adult males occurs in two size-classes for chela length. The distri- bution of prosoma lengths of these 1 1 4 males also differs from normality (x^ = 17.2, df= 7, N = 80, P < 0.025). Having determined the existence of two size- BENTON -LIFE-HISTORY OF EUSCORPIUS FLA VICAUDIS 107 Claw length (mm) Figure 3.— The observed (filled bars) and expected (stippled bars) distributions of chela-lengths of 1 14 male scorpions from Sheemess. The expected distribution is a normal distribution given the mean and standard deviation of the observed. The distributions differ significantly (x^ = 21.1, 7, F < 0.001). The two modes of the observed distribution correspond to two instars. classes, cluster analysis was conducted on 66 males for which measures of prosoma length, chela width and chela length were available, in order to divide the adults more exactly. Figure 2 shows that the analysis splits the males into two groups based on different relationships be- tween the prosoma length and the chela-size in- dex. Large males have disproportionately large chelae. The determination of the boundaries of the clusters by the above analysis allows calculation of the average weights and body size (prosoma -I- mesosoma, measured as one unit). Large males are, on average, 145% heavier than small males Table 1 . — Progression factors (PFs) in E. flavicaudis. A PF is the multiplicative increase in dimensions between instars. The first instar is atypical due to its incompletely sclerotized exoskeleton. The mean PFs for the other instars are 1.30 ± 0.09 (prosoma length) and 1.34 ± 0.1 1 (width of stemite V). As there are no data for the third instar, the PFs for the second-third and third-fourth molts are estimated by taking the square-root of the increase between the second and fourth instars. Final instars often show a lower PF than earlier instars (e.g., Polis & Farley 1979). Prosoma length Progression Width Progression Instar [mm ± SD («)] factor [mm ± SD (n)] factor 1st 1.10 ± 0.14(8) 1.50 1.34^ 1.30 1.32 1.20 1.24 ± 0.24 (8) 1.16 1.442 1.40 1.43 1.22 2nd 1.65 ± 0.04 (12) 1.42 ± 0.08 (12) 4th 2.96 ± 0.14 (4) 2.95 ± 0.24 (4) 5th 3.86 ± 0.26 (8) 4.14 ± 0.40 (8) Female 6th 5.11 ± 0.37 (20) 5.94 ± 0.59 (20) Female 7th 6.15 ± 0.38 (19) 7.24 ± 0.45 (19) 5th Male 6th 5.47 ± 0.39 (38) 1.42 1.17 5.34 ± 0.56 (49) 1.29 1.20 Male 7th 6.39 ± 0.28 (28) 6.53 ± 0.35 (30) 108 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY (0.658 ± 0.124 g cf. 0.428 ± 0.115 g; Mann- Whitney {720,23 = 36.5, P = 0.0001), and their body length averages 117% longer (18.9 ± 1.6 mm cf. 16.2 ± 1.7 mm; Mann-Whitney Ujoii = 45, P = 0.0001). Perhaps the most parsimonious explanation for this dimorphism is that two instars of adult males exist within the population. The mean lengths of the males in each cluster allow the calculation of putative progression factors (Table 1). Number of adult female instars. —As with males, females known to be mature (because they gave birth in the laboratory) show a wide range in size (Fig. 4). Animals assumed to be adult females have a larger range of sizes than that of adult males (prosoma length 4.46-7.22 mm of 5.07-7.14 mm in males). However no obvious dimorphism is apparent within females, as they do not have an allometric relationship between chela size and body size. For all available vari- ables there are no significant departures from normality in the frequency distributions (x^ = 5 .1 , df = 1 , N = P > 0.50 for chela length; = 10.26, df= 1 , N = 19, P > 0.10 for chela width; x' = 2.1 1, #= 6, iV = 40, P > 0.90 for prosoma length). It is however possible that there are two instars of adult females, but the fre- quency distributions overlap more than males making females difficult to separate. To investigate this further, cluster statistics were used to divide adult females into two size- classes (using the variables prosoma length and CSI). The means of the clumps were then used to calculate hypothetical progression factors (Ta- ble 1) which agree well with what would be pre- dicted if there were two instars. Resightings of marked individuals in the field suggest that adults can live for at least two years (Benton in press a) and growth to maturity may take three or more years. As post-maturation molts are unknown in scorpions (Polis & Sissom 1990), adult sixth instars do not become adult seventh instars, so we might expect females ma- turing at the seventh instar to have a reproduc- tive benefit. A higher per-season reproductive success is the most obvious reason that natural selection may favor the delay of female maturity for several months and an extra instar. Under laboratory conditions built to mimic closely the scorpions’ habitat in England, 16 females gave birth to viable broods (Benton in press b). Within these females (where data are available) a sig- Figure 4.— Relationship between chela-size index (CSI = length of chela x width) and prosoma length in adult females. Data have been separated into two putative instars (see text), sixth (circles) and seventh (squares). Females known to have given birth (filled symbols) occur in both instars. nificant relationship exists between female pro- soma size and the weight of her brood {R^ = 0.36, P, ,0 = 5.6, P < 0.05), and a positive relationship exists between female size and number of young (R2 = 0.23, F,,„ = 3.29, P = 0.10). Using the size criteria, determined by the earlier cluster analysis, to separate these females into two groups, it can be shown that a “small” female has on average 30 ± 5 young (range 26-38, N = 5) weighing 0.237 ± 0.048 g (range 0. 1 96-0.3 1 5, N = 5); whereas a large female has 36 ± 9 young (range 25-51, A = 10) weighing 0.327 ± 0.063 g (range 0.210-0.420, N = 9). The difference in brood weights is significant (Mann-Whitney 6/5 9 = 6, P < 0.05), the difference in brood sizes is not ({75,10= 15, P= 0.2). DISCUSSION From data reviewed in Francke and Sissom (1984) the mean number of instars in scorpions is 7.0 ± 1.2 (A = 57). In the present study there appear also to be seven instars of Euscorpius flavicaudis. However, perhaps the most interesting aspect of this life-history study is the evidence of finding more than one instar of adults. The evidence for this is that sexually mature males are dimorphic in size. The means of the two size-classes are separated by progression factors of the expected size. If there were not two instars, a progression factor of 1.48 (for increase in prosoma length) for the fifth instar-adult male molt would be nec- essary. This would be higher than that previously BENTON-LIFE-HISTORY OF EUSCORPJUS FLA VICAUDIS 109 reported for scorpions (scorpion average =1.28 ± 0.04, data from Polis & Farley 1979). Sexually mature females do not occur in two size-classes, but the range of female size is greater than for males. It was therefore hypothesized that two instars of adult female existed. Cluster statistics were then used to divide the range of adult fe- males into two groups. To test the hypothesis, two predictions were made: (1) progression fac- tors for the two groups should be within the nor- mal range for scorpions, and (2) larger females should have a greater reproductive success per breeding attempt. Qualitatively, both these pre- dictions were supported by data. Life-history polymorphism is not unusual among scorpions. Francke and Sissom (1984) list 32 species for which the sexually mature instars had been determined. Of these species 47% (15) showed more than one adult instar (three species where only females mature at more than one instar, six only males and six both). The only record of a chactid scorpion with a life-history polymorphism is for E. italicus, where Anger- mann (1957) reports two instars of adult females. No cases are known where scorpions continue to molt after they mature (Polis & Sissom 1990), so sixth instar adult scorpions are unlikely to molt a seventh time. Thus, the sixth instar of this population of E. Jlavicaudis consists of adult males and females, and sub-adult males and fe- males. Adult males are immediately distinguish- able owing to their notch in the pedipalpal fin- gers. However, the other categories of sixth instar are not easily distinguishable. Unfortunately the significance of the range of adult sizes was not realized until after the field study of this popu- lation had finished. In addition, the population is small and has a threatened status (Benton in press a) so I was unwilling to collect a large num- ber of specimens for dissection. In total, 25 fe- males (sixth and seventh instars) were preserved, and on closer inspection one of these was found to be a male without the obvious secondary sex- ual characteristics: he was a sub-adult. The pro- soma length of this individual was 4.73 mm, with a CSI of 24.3 mm^, putting it within the range of “adult females” (Fig. 4). Further, this sub- adult male has an average progression factor of 1.28 when compared to the average dimensions of the fifth instar scorpions which is within the normal range in this species. This makes it much more likely that this specimen is a small sixth instar male rather than a very large fifth instar. Given the state of preservation of the specimens it was not possible to determine whether there were sixth instar immature females amongst them. Although the observed life-history polymor- phism in scorpions has previously been reported, for the first time an attempt can be made to explain its evolutionary significance. Seventh in- star males are, on average, 1 .20 times larger than sixth instar males; and seventh instar females 1.21 times larger than sixth (average of the pro- gression factors for prosoma length, chela length, chela width and body width). Behavioral and ecological correlates of size do exist. In this spe- cies, the scorpion’s primary offensive and defen- sive weapons are its chelae. Chela size predicts the outcome of fights between males for female- occupied burrows during the mating season, and large-clawed males can “persuade” otherwise unwilling females to mate (Benton in press b). It is interesting, therefore, that chela-size increases disproportionately to body size between the sixth and seventh instar adult males. Seventh instar males, therefore, have a higher per-season re- productive success than sixth instar males. In females, the benefit of being large seems also to be a greater reproductive success, in that large females have heavier (and more) offspring than smaller females. In Paruroctonus mesaensis rate of food intake was shown to have a significant effect on brood weights (Polis & McCormick 1987). This may result from the ability to in- crease food intake rate, by capturing larger prey. Larger scorpions win cannibalistic contests (Polis 1980; Benton 1990), so may obtain more food in this way. If scorpions have a higher per-season repro- ductive success as seventh instar adults, why do any mature at the sixth instar? The answer to this must lie in the fact that seventh instar scor- pions delay their maturity. In the study popu- lation in England, females give birth in late sum- mer (Benton in press b) and the first instar lasts 7 days (Benton 1991). Second instars overwinter and molt the following spring to the third instar. The duration of subsequent instars is unknown, but laboratory studies uniformly show that instar duration increases as scorpions age (W. D. Sis- som, pers. commun.), so it is plausible that sev- enth instar adults, by delaying maturity, miss one mating season. Adult longevity is difficult to as- sess, but the longest period between resightings of an adult (male) in the field is 23 months. Lon- 110 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY gevity for two or more mating seasons is prob- able. Two maturation strategies exist in this popu- lation of scorpions: to mature at the sixth instar, and be small, or to delay maturity until the sev- enth instar and be large. It is possible that the two strategies’ payoffs are frequency dependent, and occur at an equilibrium value— the Evolu- tionarily Stable Strategy (ESS, Maynard Smith 1 982). This subject is explored further in Benton (in press b). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks are due to the Medway Ports Authority for permission to work at Sheemess. M. Evans, G. Miller, G. Polls, and W. D. Sissom com- mented on the manuscript, as did S. Benton who was a continual support during the project. The project was funded by an SERC studentship, un- der the supervision of W. A. Foster. LITERATURE CITED Angermann, H. 1957. Uber Verhalten, Spermato- phorenbildung und Sinniesphysiologie von Euscor- pius italicus Herbst und verwandten Arten. Z. Tier- psychol., 14:276-302. Benton, T. G. 1990. The Behavior and Ecology of Scorpions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, UK. Benton, T. G. 1991. Reproduction and parental care in the scorpion Euscorpius flavicaudis. Behaviour, 117:20-28. Benton, T. G. in press a. The ecology of the scorpion, Euscorpius flavicaudis, in England. J. Zool. (Lon- don). Benton, T. G. in press b. Determinants of male mat- ing success in a scorpion. Anim. Behav. Francke, O. F. & W. D. Sissom. 1984. Comparative review of the methods used to determine the num- ber of molts to maturity in scorpions (Arachnida), with analysis of the post-birth development of Vae- jovis coahuilae Williams (Vaejovidae). J. Arachnol., 12:1-20. Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. Norusis, M. J. 1985. SPSSx Advanced Statistics Guide. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. Polis, G. A. 1980. The significance of cannibalism on the demography and activity in a natural pop- ulation of desert scorpions. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 7:25-35. Polis, G. A. & R. D. Farley. 1979. Characteristics and environmental determinants of natality, growth and maturity in a natural population of the desert scorpion, Paruroctonus mesaensis (Scorpionida: Vaejovide). J. Zool., 187:517-542. Polis, G. A. & S. J. McCormick. 1987. Intraguild predation and competition among desert scorpions. Ecology, 68:332-343. Polis, G. A. & W. D. Sissom. 1 990. Life History. Pp. 161-223, In The Biology of Scorpions (G. A. Polis, ed.). Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA. Ridley, M. 1986. Evolution and Classification: The Reformation of Cladism. Longman, London. Shorthouse, D. J. & T. G. Marples. 1982. The life stages and population dynamics of an arid zone scorpion Urodacus yaschenkoi (Birula 1903). Aus- tralian J. Ecol., 7:109-118. Smith, G. T. 1966. Observations on the life-history of the scorpion Urodacus abruptus Pocock (Scor- pionidae) and an analysis of its home sites. Austra- lian J. Zool., 14:383-398. Williams, S. C. 1987. Scorpion bionomics. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 32:275-295. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd Ed. Pren- tice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Manuscript received October 1990, revised December 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:1 1 1-1 14 HOMING BY CRAB SPIDERS MISUMENA VATIA (ARANEAE, THOMISIDAE) SEPARATED FROM THEIR NESTS Douglass H. Morse: Graduate Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Division of Biology and Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912 USA Abstract. Nest-guarding female crab spiders Misumena vatia sometimes become dis- placed from their nests on milkweed leaves. Experimentally displaced individuals usually found their way back to their nests if put at the bottom of the stem containing their nest, even though they had no silken lines to guide them. In repeat runs they performed similarly, although returning more rapidly than in the initial runs. Spiders displaced several cm from their nests recruited to them much less successfully than spiders at the base of the stem. Finding lost nests may be important because in unguarded ones. The advent of parental care presents the par- ents with a number of problems. One is to pro- vide for their own young, because an individual typically negates its fitness by tending unrelated offspring. Solutions to this problem might either be direct, as in identifying one’s own young, or indirect, as in locating a rearing site, such as a nest (Beer 1970; White 1971). If the parents pro- vide extended care, they may have to forage for themselves or for their young. Hunting for food may present another problem, returning to the site at which offspring have been left. Many of the classic homing experiments test returns to nest sites, and both olfactory and visual cues have been implicated (e.g., Tinbergen 1951; von Frisch 1967). As an alternative to recognition of young or site, parents may remain in contact with offspring throughout the period of care. In the latter instance, parents may not have a well-de- veloped recognition of either their site or off- spring (Morse 1989). If such animals become accidentally displaced they may have only a lim- ited ability to relocate their sites, which may have serious consequences for their offsprings’ suc- cess. Crab spiders Misumena vatia (Clerck) provide an opportunity to explore and test the responses of displaced individuals that normally do not stray from their nest site. They lay a single clutch of eggs (Gertsch 1939; Morse 1988), which they guard, often until the young emerge from the egg masses nearly a month later (Morse 1987). How- ever, some individuals disappear from the nest more offspring survive in guarded nests than sites before their young emerge. Probably about half of these adults die of senescence, and the other half leave, or, occasionally, are preyed upon at the nests (Morse 1987). Some of the spiders that leave appear to become accidentally sepa- rated from their nest sites (Morse 1989). Dis- placement might occur if they are attacked or otherwise disturbed and drop from the nest with- out laying down silken lines as they do at other times. Occasionally the spiders resort to this be- havior when handled by humans, and under nat- ural circumstances ants may cause the spiders to give this reaction (Morse 1989), although they usually do not nest in the presence of aggressive ants. As a result, the spiders contact the ground stratum without a line to retrace to their previous site. Without a line, their ability to find their nest may be compromised. These matters are im- portant to the spiders, because guarded nests are more successful than unguarded ones (Morse 1987, 1988, in prep.). The present study tests the ability of individuals separated from their nests to return to them, both with and without pre- viously deposited silken drag-lines. METHODS I carried out these studies in a field in Bremen, Lincoln Co., Maine. I have described this area in detail elsewhere (Morse 1979, 1981). During the summers of 1 988 and 1 990 1 tested the ability of post-reproductive brooding spiders to find nest sites from which I had displaced them. Since nest sites on nonflowering common milkweeds As- 111 112 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1.— Performance of nest-guarding spiders placed at various sites, a = Results in 1988 and 1990 did not differ significantly, so data pooled, b = This individual did not return to nest on either first or second run. c = Does not include one individual that did not return, d = Data from 1990 only, e = Does not include 10 individuals that did not return. Manipulation N Return to nest Did not return to nest Time to return N S ± SD Placed at bottom of nest stem'* 30 26 4 14 40.0 ± 32.4 Placed at bottom of nest stem a second time'* 15 14 lb 14 27.6 ± 23.6^ Placed on substrate** 30 12 18 5 75.8 ± 42.3‘‘’= depias syriaca L., the most commonly used lo- cations in the study area, averaged over 50 cm above the ground, and nests on flowering milk- weeks over 80 cm (Morse 1985), cues to the pres- ence of their nests may be obscure or nonexistent from the substrate below. I placed spiders that were about to lay (Morse 1988) on the upper leaves of nonflowering milk- weed plants and then put cages (50 cm x 50 cm X 150 cm) of 0.2 cm x 0.2 cm metal screening over these plants. The spiders always lay at night, usually one to three days after being placed on those sites (Morse 1985). In this set of experi- ments I only used spiders that laid on the night following placement in the cages, thereby mini- mizing the probability that they would produce a silken thread between the substrate and the nest. In observations made in this and other stud- ies, spiders that laid on the night following re- lease invariably remained on the leaves of the upper parts of the plants, and all observed shifts in site took place at that height. Several individ- uals began to manipulate their nest leaf within a few hours (see Morse 1985) and subsequently confined their activity to that leaf Individuals that moved to the substrate or the screening of the cage laid on a subsequent night and were thus not included. I removed post-reproductive individuals (not over four days after laying) from their nests and released them in two different places: 1) at the base of the stems on which their nests were placed, and 2) one (1988) or two (1990) days later, in the grassy substrate underneath these plants at the outer edge of the area covered by the nest- stem’s leaves. Distances of releases from the stems of the spiders’ nest plants using the latter crite- rion (lengths of longest leaves) averaged 12.1 ± 1.5 cm (measured only in 1990). Individuals placed on the stems in 1990 were run on the stems in the same way a second time one day later. This manipulation provided a comparison with the initial run, the difference being the pres- ence of a silken thread on the stem. All of the 1990 spiders were placed in the substrate one day after the second run on the stems to test their ability at finding the stem of their nest plant. In testing responses of spiders put at the bot- tom of their nest plants, I assumed a 50:50 prob- ability that they would move up the stems toward their nests by chance. This was a reasonable as- sumption, given that they were placed in contact with the stem, and that approximately half of the path directions available to them if they moved forward would subtend the stem immediately in front of them. RESULTS Brooding spiders displaced to the base of the stem of their nest plant returned to their nests more frequently than predicted by chance over a two-hour period, assuming a 50:50 predicted level of choice, as above (Table 1: Z = 3.83, P < 0.001 in a one-tailed binomial test). Individ- uals run a second time on the following day per- formed equally accurately (Table 1). Further, they returned to their nests significantly more rapidly on the second day than the first (Table 1: T = 16'/2, Z = 2.027, P < 0.02 in a one-tailed Wil- coxon signed ranks, matched pairs test). This difference could have been a response to the threads that the spiders laid down on the stems during the previous day’s ascent. Since I initially placed these individuals on the plants shortly before they deposited their egg mass, they were very unlikely to have had access to a line on their first run. These spiders were then placed on the sub- strate under the outer extremity of the leaves of the nest plant, but nearer to its stem than to any MORSE-NEST HNDING BY CRAB SPIDERS 113 other milkweed stem. They returned to their nest significantly less frequently from here than from the base of the stem (Table 1: G = 14.92, df = \, P < 0.001 in a G-test). Further, the four in- dividuals that failed to find their nests from the bottom of the stem in the first test (Table 1) also failed to find their way to the stem in this test. DISCUSSION These spiders clearly have well-developed abilities to respond to displacement on the nest plant. Simply moving upward on the stems would suffice if they drop to the base of the stem, be- cause they will soon reach nest height, where parent spiders almost invariably lay down lines among the nest leaf, adjacent leaves, and stem proper (Morse 1985). This architecture results from the periodic movements that the spiders make in the immediate vicinity of their nest site, laying down lines in the process, as a result se- curing the nest tightly to the surrounding vege- tation. In many instances a line would naturally extend from the bottom of the stem to near the top, a result of the spider’s initial recruitment onto the plant. However, if they moved from the leaf of an adjacent plant, no such line would exist. The present experiments attempted to eliminate the question of initially using lines by placing the spiders onto the sites just before they built their nest. The shorter recruitment time on the second runs suggested that a line, when present, hastened movement to their nest, although it did not elim- inate the possibility of experience playing a role. The spiders responded significantly more poorly to greater displacement, suggesting that falling off a plant without using a line is a drastic action. Spiders do not appear to take this option frequently. Under natural conditions, aggressive ants may prompt this response most often. The only ants observed to attack the spiders {Formica sp. L.) have a patchy distribution in the study area, and the spiders do not appear to build their nests at sites frequented by them. However, nest- ing spiders may not always be able to avoid ants, because if aphids recruit to plants after the spi- ders choose their nest sites, ants may recruit in turn in response to the aphids. Although some of the spiders displaced in the substrate might eventually have found their nests, occasional observations of individuals naturally displaced from their sites shortly after laying, and showing no signs of hunting, suggest that these spiders may frequently be unable to relocate their nests. Four such individuals located on vegeta- tion 30-100 cm from their nests for either two or three days were placed back on their nests, and three of them remained there for one day or more, strongly suggesting that although the pro- pensity to guard remained, they did not have the ability to relocate their nests (Morse 1987). Giv- en the demonstrated importance of guarding (Morse 1988), even moderate periods of absence from these nests may appreciably increase the chance of failure. The performance of these post-reproductive spiders is profitably compared with results from analogous experiments run on pre-reproductive adult female spiders searching for hunting sites on flowering milkweed stems (Morse in prog- ress). In contrast to the 26 of 30 post-reproduc- tive spiders finding their nest sites (Table 1), only 16 of 32 pre-reproductive individuals selected flowering stems when they were placed on the base of them {G = 10.05, df= \, P < 0.01 in a G-test). These results suggest that the parents’ success in relocating their nest sites involved traits missing or poorly developed in the pre-repro- ductive individuals. In contrast, post-reproduc- tive individuals placed on the substrate did not differ in nest-finding success from pre-reproduc- tive individuals finding stems with satisfactory hunting sites on the flowering plants [12 of 30 post-reproductive individuals successful (Table 1), vs. 34 of 76 pre-reproductive spiders: G = 0.20, df=\,P> 0.5 in a G-test]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank R. G. Gillespie, R. S. Souter, and J. K. Waage for comments on the manuscript. E. B. Noyce generously permitted use of her prop- erty. K. Cha, L. Heller, B. Hyman, N. McKay, and E. Morse assisted with the experiments. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (BSR85- 16279 and BSR90-07722). LITERATURE CITED Beer, C. G. 1970. Individual recognition of voice in the social behaviour of birds. Adv. Stud. Behav., 3: 27-74. Gertsch, W. J. 1939. A revision of the typical crab- spiders (Misumeninae) of America north of Mexico. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 76:277-442. Morse, D. H. 1979. Prey capture by the crab spider Misumena calycina (Araneae: Thomisidae). Oecol- ogia, 39:309-319. Morse, D. H. 1981. Prey capture by the crab spider Misumena vatia (L.) (Thomisidae) on three com- 114 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY mon native flowers. Amer. Midi. Natur., 105:358- 367. Morse, D. H. 1985. Nests and nest-site selection of the crab spider Misumena vatia (Araneae, Thom- isidae) on milkweed. J. Arachnol., 13:383-390. Morse, D. H. 1987. Attendance patterns, prey cap- ture, changes in mass, and survival of crab spiders Misumena vatia (Araneae, Thomisidae) guarding their nests. J. Arachnol., 15:193-204. Morse,D. H. 1988. Relationship between crab spider Misumena vatia nesting success and earlier patch- choice decisions. Ecology, 69:1970-1973. Morse, D. H. 1989. Nest acceptance by the crab spi- der Misumena vatia (Araneae, Thomisidae). J. Ar- achnol., 17:49-57. Tinbergen, N. 1951. The Study of Instinct. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England. von Frisch, K. 1967. The dance language and ori- entation of bees. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mas- sachusetts. White, S. J. 1971. Selective responsiveness by the gannet {Sula bassana) to played-back calls. Anim. Behav., 19:135-141. Manuscript received November 1990, revised December 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:1 15-121 ON EURASIAN AND AMERICAN TALANITES (ARANEAE, GNAPHOSIDAE) Norman I. Platnick: Department of Entomology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024 USA Vladimir I. Ovtsharenko; Zoological Institute, Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaja emb. 1, Leningrad 199034 USSR Abstract. The North American spider genus Rachodrassus Chamberlin is newly syn- onymized with the Old World genus Talanites Simon. The type species, Talanites fervidus Simon from Israel, is redescribed, and the species of Talanites occurring in the Soviet Union are revised. Four new species are described: T. mikhailovi from Kazakhstan, T. dunini from Azerbaijan and Turkmenia, and T. moodyae and T. ubicki from California. The North American spiders of the genus Rachodrassus were revised by Platnick and Shadab (1976), who recognized three species as valid: R. echinus Chamberlin and R. exlineae Platnick and Shadab from the southeastern Unit- ed States, and R. captiosus (Gertsch and Davis) from southern Texas and northeastern Mexico. We have recently had the opportunity to com- pare representatives of these species with Eur- asian taxa that have been placed in the genus Talanites Simon, and have concluded that the New and Old World taxa are congeneric. We present here a redescription of the type species of Talanites, T. fervidus Simon from Israel, along with a revision of the Soviet fauna of the group and a description of two additional American species from California. In an unpublished thesis, Penniman (1 985) ob- served that specimens of Rachodrassus lack pre- coxal sclerites (i.e., sclerotized extentions of the sternal margin that reach toward, and sometimes between, the coxae). Because he considered this feature synapomorphic for a large group of gna- phosoids and clubionoids, Penniman suggested that Rachodrassus is misplaced as a gnaphosid. Although we have observed tiny but distinct pre- coxal sclerites in some species, we agree that Tal- anites may prove to be misplaced. In particular, the posterior median eyes are often circular, rath- er than irregularly shaped as in typical gnaphos- ids, and the palpal endites may show only vague traces of an oblique depression. The anterior lat- eral spinnerets, however, are enlarged, heavily sclerotized, tubular, and widely separated at their base, as in other gnaphosids, and their piriform gland spigots are widened (Platnick 1990, figs. 80-82). Similar piriform gland spigots occur in some male (but not female) Clubionidae; in Tal- anites, however, both sexes have widened piri- form gland spigots, and females also have cylin- drical gland spigots on the posterior median and posterior lateral spinnerets that are lacking in those clubionids but present in other gnaphosids. We therefore retain Talanites in the Gnaphosi- dae, at least until a better corroborated hypoth- esis of its relationships can be supported. The format of the descriptions and abbrevia- tions used follow those of Platnick and Shadab (1976); measurements (taken from type material, unless otherwise indicated) are in mm. Talanites Simon Talanites Simon, 1893:363 (type species by original designation Talanites fervidus Simon). Rachodrassus Chamberlin, 1922:160 (type species by original designation Rachodrassus echinus Cham- berlin). NEW SYNONYMY. Drassyllochemmis Gertsch and Davis, 1 940: 1 7 (type species by original designation Drassyllochemmis captiosus Gertsch and Davis). First synonymized with Rachodrassus by Platnick and Shadab, 1976:4. Diagnosis. — See Platnick and Shadab (1976: 4); the presence of two dorsal spines on tibia IV has been corroborated for all the Eurasian species examined, but some of those species lack the second point on the median apophysis of the male palp. Those males are readily recognizable as Talanites, however, by the palpal conforma- 115 116 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 1-4.— 1, 2, Talanites fervidus Simon; 3, 4, T. ubicki, new species: 1, left male palp, ventral view; 2, same, retrolateral view; 3, epigynum, ventral view; 4, same, dorsal view. tion, including a long and arched palpal tibia, a wide prolateral embolus, and a greatly elongated median apophysis. Description.— See Platnick and Shadab (1976: 4). Included species.— From America, T. echinus (Chamberlin), NEW COMBINATION; T. exli- neae (Platnick and Shadab), NEW COMBINA- TION; T. captiosus (Gertsch and Davis, NEW COMBINATION; and T. moodyae and T. ubicki, new species; from Eurasia, at least T. fervidus Simon and the four Soviet species discussed be- low. Examination of the types and other speci- mens of two further Soviet species, T. aculeatus Charitonov (1946, 1969) and T. atscharicus Mcheidze (1946), indicates that they do not be- long to Talanites. The figures provided for T. tibialis Caporiacco (1934) from India and Pa- kistan indicate that it is also misplaced. Of the other described species (from Greece, north Af- rica, and Burma), little can be said until their types can be examined. Talanites fervidus Simon Figs. 1, 2 Talanites fervidus Simon, 1893:363 (male syntype from the Dead Sea area, Israel, in MNHN, examined). Diagnosis.— Males resemble those of T. mik- hailovi in having an excavated embolar base, but the embolus (Fig. 1 ) is longer than in that species. Male.— Total length 4.09. Carapace 1.88 long, 1.50 wide. Femur II 1.54 long. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.05, ALE 0.05, PME 0.05, PLE 0.05; AME-AME 0.04, AME-ALE 0.03, PME-PME 0.09, PME-PLE 0.08, ALE-PLE 0.03; MOQ length 0.14, front width 0.14, back width 0.19. Leg spination: femora: I pO-1-1; II rO-0-0; III rO-1-1; tibiae: I pl-1-1, v2-2-2; II v2-2-2, rO- 0-0; III vlp-2-2; metatarsi: II pO-1-0; IV pl-2- 2. Tibial apophysis directed retrolaterally, scarcely wider than basal tibial spine; embolar base excavated, tip twisted; median apophysis without second point (Figs. 1 , 2). Female.— Although Simon recorded both sex- es, no females are now housed with the male syntype described above. Material examined . — Only the syntype, without date or collector. Talanites mikhailmi, new species Figs. 17, 18 Type. —Male holotype from Dzhanibek, Ural, Kazakhstan (30 June-6 July 1982; K. G. Mik- hailov), deposited in ZIL. PLATNICK & OVTSHARENKO-r^i^Af/T’E'S (GNAPHOSIDAE) 117 ■Sm§M Figures 5-8.—Talanites dunini, new species: 5, left male palp, ventral view; 6, same, retrolateral view; 7, epigynum, ventral view; 8, same, dorsal view. Etymology.— The specific name is a patronym in honor of the collector of the holotype, Dr. K. Mikhailov of Moscow State University. Diagnosis.— Males resemble those of T. fer- vidus in having an excavated embolar base, but the embolus (Fig. 1 7) is shorter than in that spe- cies. Male.— Total length 4.90. Carapace 2.27 long, 1.69 wide. Femur II 1.28 long. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.06, ALE 0.09, PME 0.06, PLE 0.07; AME-AME 0.06, AME-ALE 0.03, PME-PME 0. 1 1 , PME-PLE 0.11, ALE-PLE 0.05; MOQ length 0.19, front width 0.18, back width 0.23. Leg spination: femur I pO-1-1; tibiae; I v2- 2-2, rO-1-1; II v2-2-2, rl-1-1; metatarsus II pl- 1-0. Tibial apophysis short, wide, directed dis- tally; embolar base excavated, tip twisted; me- dian apophysis with second point (Figs. 17, 18). Female Unknown. Other material examined. —USSR; Kazakhstan: Ural; Dzhanibek, 27-30 June 1975 (Y. I. Chernov), 1 male (ZIL). Talanites dunini, new species Figs. 5-8 Types.— Male holotype and female allotype from Saatly, Dzhafarkhan, Saatlinskii, Azerbai- jan (31 August 1982; P. M. Dunin), deposited in ZIL. Etymology.— The specific name is a patronym in honor of the collector of the types. Diagnosis.— Males can be recognized by the blade-shaped embolus (Fig. 5), females by the short, flattened, and triangular epigynal hood (Fig. 7). Male.— Total length 4.43. Carapace 2.03 long, 1.61 wide. Femur II 1.58 long. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.07, ALE 0.09, PME 0.07, PLE 0.09; AME-AME 0.07, AME-ALE 0.03, PME-PME 0. 1 3, PME-PLE 0.09, ALE-PLE 0.04; MOQ length 0.20, front width 0.21, back width 0.27. Leg spination: femora: I pO-1-1; II rO-0-0; tibiae: I, II v2-2-2; III vlp-2-2; metatarsi I, II pi -0-0. Tibial apophysis short, directed retro- laterally; embolus blade-shaped, with narrow base; median apophysis without second point (Figs. 5, 6). Female.— Total length 5.87. Carapace 2.36 long, 1.76 wide. Femur II 1.61 long. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.07, ALE 0.10, PME 0.08, PLE 0.10; AME-AME 0.06, AME-ALE 0.03, PME-PME 0. 1 4, PME-PLE 0.13, ALE-PLE 0.06; MOQ length 0.26, front width 0.21, back width 0.30. Leg spination: femora: I dl-1-0, pO- Figures 9-\2. — Talanites fagei Spassky: 9, left male palp, ventral view; 10, same, retrolateral view; 11, epi- gynum, ventral view; 1 2, same, dorsal view. 1-1; II dl-1-0; tibiae: I pO-0-0, v2-2-0; II pO-0- 0, v2-2-lp, rO-0-0; III vlp-2-2. Epigynum with pocket-like lateral ridges and short, flattened, tri- angular anterior hood (Fig. 7); spermathecae rectangular (Fig. 8). Other material examined.— USSR; Azerbaijan: Saa- tlinskii: Saatly, Dzhafarkhan, 16 June-25 August 1982 (P. M. Dunin), 10 males, 1 female (ZIL). Turkmenia: East Kopetdag: Miana-Chaach, 22-28 Apr. 1978 (G. T. Kusnetsov), 5 males (ZIL); Krasnovodskaya: Kara- Kala, Kara-Kalinskii, 4 May 1987 (A. A. Zyuzin), 1 male (ZIL). Talanites fagei Spassky Figs. 9-12 Talanites fagei Spassky, 1938:577, figs. 3, 4 (two male and two female syntypes from Turkmenia and Ka- zakhstan, in ZIL, examined). Diagnosis.— Males can be recognized by the distally expanded and bifid embolus (Fig. 9), fe- males by the long, pointed anterior epigynal hood (Fig. 11). Male (Ustyurt).— Total length 4.54. Carapace 1.99 long, 1.61 wide. Femur II 1.60 long. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.07, ALE 0.09, PME 0.08, PLE 0.09; AME-AME 0.06, AME- ALE 0.03, PME-PME 0.11, PME-PLE 0.11, ALE-PLE 0.05; MOQ length 0.21, front width 0.20, back width 0.27. Leg spination: femora: I pO-2-1, rO-1-1; IV rO-1-1; tibiae: I v2-2-2, rl-1- 0; II v2-2-2, r 1-1-0; metatarsi: II pO-1-0; III p2- 2-2. Tibial apophysis short, directed retrolater- ally; embolus distally expanded, bifid; median apophysis without second point (Figs. 9, 10). Female (Ustyurt).— Total length 5.96. Cara- pace 2.18 long, 1.67 wide. Femur II 1.50 long. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.08, ALE 0.10, PME 0.08, PLE 0.09; AME-AME 0.06, AME-ALE 0.03, PME-PME 0.14, PME-PLE 0.13, ALE-PLE 0.06; MOQ length 0.23, front width 0.22, back width 0.30. Leg spination: fem- ora: I dl-1-0, pO-1-1; II dl-1-0; tibiae: I pO-0-0, v2-2-0; II pO-0-0, vlr-2-lp, rO-0-0; III vlp-2-2, rO-1-1; IV vlp-2-2. Anterior epigynal hood acutely pointed (Fig. 1 1); spermathecae angular (Fig. 12). Material examined.— USSR: Kazakhstan: Alma-Ata: Alma-Ata, Apr. 1919 (V. Shnitnikov), 1 male (syntype, ZIL), 15 May 1921 (V. Shnitnikov), 1 female (syntype, ZIL); Kurty, Kurtinskii, July 1989 (A. A. Zyuzin), 1 male (ZIL). Gurievskaya: Ustyurt Reservation, Onere River, Ustyurt plateau, 16-21 May 1989 (A. A. Raik- PLATNICK & OYTSHARENKO-TALANITES (GNAPHOSIDAE) 119 Figures 13-16.— 13, 14, Talanites strandi Spassky; 15, 16, T. moodyae, new species: 13, left male palp, ventral view; 14, same, retrolateral view; 15, epigynum, ventral view; 16, same, dorsal view. hanov, S. I. Ibraev), 4 males, 7 females (ZIL). Kirgizia: Ferghana Mountain ridge, 16 June 1984, evergreen forest, elev. 1400 m (S. Zonstein), 1 male, 1 female (AMNH). Russia: Suvorovskaya, Stavropolskii, July- Aug. 1925 (N. Karancheva), 1 female (ZIL). Caucasus: Kabardino-Balcaria, Naltshik, July 1925 (M. Karaitsh- eva), 1 female (syntype, ZIL). Turkmenia: Central Ko- petdag: Firyuza, 17 Mar.-26 Apr. 1979 (G. T. Kus- netsov), 2 males, 1 female (ZIL). Serachskii: Agar- Tshishme, Serachs, 26 May 1936 (L. Freiberg), 1 male (syntype, ZIL). Talanites strandi Spassky Figs. 13, 14 Talanites strandi Spassky, 1940:353, fig. 1 (male ho- lotype from Amvrosievka, Donetskaya, Ukraine, in ZIL, examined). Diagnosis.— Males can be recognized by the folded and retrolaterally invaginated tip of the embolus (Fig. 1 3). Male (Dzhanibek).— Total length 7.61. Cara- pace 3.28 long, 2.55 wide. Femur II 2.29 long. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.07, ALE 0.11, PME 0.09, PLE 0.10; AME-AME 0.08, AME- ALE 0.04, PME-PME 0.14, PME-PLE 0.15, ALE-PLE 0.07; MOQ length 0.24, front width 0.22, back width 0.32. Leg spination: fem- ora; I pO-1-1, rl-1-0; II rl-l-l; III pl-1-1; IV pl-1-1, rl-l-l; tibiae: I pl-1-1, v2-2-2, rl-l-l; II V2-2-2, r2-l-l; III rl-1-2; IV pl-1-2, rl-1-2; metatarsi: I pO-1-0, rO-1-0; II pi- 1-0, rO-1-0; III p2-2-2. Tibial apophysis broad, shifted dorsally; embolar tip large, folded, retrolaterally invagi- nated; median apophysis with large second point (Figs. 13, 14). Female. —Unknown. Material examined. — USSR: Kazakhstan: Ural: Dzhanibek, 8- 1 1 Sept. 1 982 (K. G. Mikhailov), 2 males (ZIL). Ukraine: Donttskaya: Amvrosievka, June 1912 (N. Spasskaja, S. Spassky), 1 male (holotype, ZIL). Talanites moodyae, new species Figs. 15, 16 Type.— Female holotype taken under a large rock on the north slope of Rocky Hill, near Ex- eter, Tulare Co., California (6 January 1983; M. J. Moody, W. L. Abel), deposited in AMNH courtesy of Ms. Moody. Etymology.— The specific name is a patronym in honor of the collector of the type, who first recognized the species as new. 120 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures M-li. — Talanites mikhailovi, new species: 17, left male palp, ventral view; 18, same, retrolateral view. Diagnosis.— Females resemble those of T. ubicki in having unusually small eyes, but can be distinguished by their relatively short, wide spermathecae (Fig. 1 6). Male. — Unknown. Female.— Total length 10.36. Carapace 4.43 long, 3.36 wide. Femur II 2.88 long. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.06, ALE 0.12, PME 0.08, PLE 0.09; AME- AME 0.10, AME- ALE 0. 12, PME-PME 0.24, PME-PLE 0.26, ALE-PLE 0.12; MOQ length 0.23, front width 0.22, back width 0.40. Leg spination: femora: I dl-1-0, pO- 1-2, rO-1-0; II dl-1-0, pl-1-1, rO-1-0; III, IV dl- 1-1, pl-1-1, rO-1-1; tibiae: I v2-2-lp; II v2-2-2; metatarsi: III pi -2-2, v2-2-2, r2-2-2. Epigynum with distinct anterior margin, short lateral mar- gins, and wide median plate (Fig. 15); sperma- thecae short, wide (Fig. 16). Other material examined.— None. Talanites ubicki, new species Figs. 3, 4 Type. — Female holotype taken under serpen- tine floats along San Marin Drive, Novata, Mar- in Co, California (7 March 1982; D. Ubick), de- posited in AMNH courtesy of Mr. Ubick. Etymology.— The specific name is a patronym in honor of the collector of the type, who first recognized the species as new. Diagnosis.— Females resemble those of T. moodyae in having unusually small eyes, but can be distinguished by their longer spermathecae (Fig. 4). Male Unknown . Female.— Total length 6.08. Carapace 2.67 long, 2.08 wide. Femur II 1.80 long. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.06, ALE 0.10, PME 0.05, PLE 0.07; AME-AME 0.07, AME-ALE 0.06, PME-PME 0. 16, PME-PLE 0. 1 5, ALE-PLE 0.05; MOQ length 0.18, front width 0.19, back width 0.27. Leg spination: femora: I dl-1-0, pO- 0-1; II dl-1-0, pO-1-1; III dl-1-1, pO-1-1, rl-1- 1; IV dl-1-1, pO-1-1, rO-1-1; tibiae: I v2-2-0; II v2-2-lp; metatarsi: III p2-2-2, v2-2-2, rl-2-2. Epigynum with small anterior hood and weak lateral margins (Fig. 3); spermathecae long (Fig. 4). Other material examined.— One female taken with the type, three females taken at the same locality ( 1 8 Dec. 1982), and one female taken at the same locality (2 Jan. 1986), all in CDU. PLATNICK & OVTSHARENKO-r^L^iV/reS (GNAPHOSIDAE) 121 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The work reported on here was done while the first author was a guest of the Zoological Insti- tute, Akademia Nauk, Leningrad (ZIL), and that support is greatly appreciated. We thank M. J. Moody of the California Department of Food and Agriculture, and D. Ubick of the California Academy of Sciences (CDU), for providing the California specimens described above, J. Heur- tault and C. Rollard of the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN) for provid- ing type material, G. Levy of the Hebrew Uni- versity, Jerusalem, for information on the type locality of T. fervidus, and M. U. Shadab of the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) for assistance with illustrations. LITERATURE CITED Caporiacco, L. di. 1934. Aracnidi deH’Himalaia e del Karakoram raccolti dalla missione Italiana al Ka- rakoram (1929-VII). Mem. Soc. Ent. Ital., 13:1 13- 160. Chamberlin, R. V. 1922. The North American spi- ders of the family Gnaphosidae. Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 35:145-172. Charitonov, D. E. 1946. New forms of spiders of the USSR. Izv. Est.-Nauchn. Inst. Molotovsk. Univ., 12:19-32. Charitonov, D. E. 1969. Material’i k faune paukov SSR. Uchel. Zap. Permsk. Ord. Trudy. Krasn. Znam. Gos. Univ. Ime A. M. Gorkogo, 179:59-133. Gertsch, W. J. & L. I. Davis. 1940. Report on a collection of spiders from Mexico. III. Amer. Mus. Novitates, 1069:1-22. Mcheidze, T. 1 946. Nov’e vid’ paukov v Gruzii. Bull. Mus. Gaaorgie, 13(A):28 5-302. Penniman, A. J. 1985. Revision of the and pugnata groups of Scotinella (Araneae, Corinnidae, Phrurolithinae) with a reclassification of phruroli- thine spiders. Unpub. Ph.D. diss., Ohio State Uni- versity, available through University Microfilms In- ternational (no. 8510623). Platnick, N. I. 1990. Spinneret morphology and the phylogeny of ground spiders (Araneae, Gnaphoso- idea). Amer. Mus. Novitates, 2978:1-^2. Platnick, N. I. & M. U. Shadab. 1976. A revision of the spider genera Rachodrassus, Sosticus, and Sco- podes (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) in North America. Amer. Mus. Novitates, 2594:1-33. Simon, E. 1 893. Histoire naturelle des araignees. Paris, l(2):257-488. Spassky, S. 1938. Araneae palaearcticae novae. II. Riga, Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstage von Professor Dr. Embrik Strand, 4:573-582. Spassky, S. 1940. Araneae palaearcticae novae. V. Folia Zool. Hydrobiol., 10:353-364. Manuscript received November 1990, revised December 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:122-125 DIPLOCENTRUS PEREZI, A NEW SPECIES OF SCORPION FROM SOUTHEASTERN MEXICO (DIPLOCENTRIDAE) W. David Sissom: Department of Biology, Elon College, Elon College, North Carolina 27244 USA Abstract. Diplocentrus perezi, a new species of diplocentrid scorpion, is described from the Mexican state of Veracruz, representing the first report of the genus from that area. A female specimen from Tabasco is possibly referable to this species. The new species is most similar to D. mexicanus Peters, but differs from that species in carapacial granulation, tarsomere II spine formula, and carination of the pedipalps and metasoma. Studies in the last decade have shown that the genus Diplocentrus in southern Mexico and the Yucatan Peninsula is quite diverse (Francke 1977a, 1977b, 1978). However, there are cur- rently no known records of this genus from the poorly-sampled southeastern coastal states. It is the purpose here to describe a distinct new spe- cies based on an adult male specimen from southern Veracruz. A subadult female specimen from Tabasco may also be referable to this spe- cies. Nomenclature and mensuration follows that of Stahnke (1970), with the following exceptions: carinal terminology and cheliceral measure- ments are after Francke (1975, 1977a) and tri- chobothrial terminology is after Vachon (1974). Diplocentrus perezi, new species Figs. 1-7 Type data.— Holotype male from San Martin Tuxtla Volcano, Veracruz, Mexico (1300 m), September 1 985 by Gonzalo Perez-Higareda; de- posited in the American Museum of Natural His- tory, New York. Etymology.— This species is dedicated to Dr. Gonzalo Perez-Higareda, who collected the type specimen and made it available for study. Distribution.- Known from the type locality in southern Veracruz, with a possible record in Tabasco. Diagnosis.— Adult male 62 mm in length. Base color dark orange brown to brown, with distinct dusky markings throughout. Carapace with coarse granulation restricted to area surrounding ante- rior margin. Tergite VII moderately bilobed, granulose. Pectinal tooth count 14-13. Metaso- ma I-IV with 10 keels; dorsolateral carinae strong, crenulate; ventrolateral and ventral submedian carinae moderate, smooth to irregularly granu- lar. Metasoma V with dorsolateral carinae mod- erate, granular; ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae strong with large spinoid denticles. Chel- iceral chela length/chela width 1.27; fixed finger length/chela width ratio 0.69; movable finger length/chela length 1.00. Pedipalps: dorsal sur- face of femur relatively flat, width distinctly greater than depth; pedipalp patella with two dorsal carinae, the dorsomedian strong, smooth and the dorsoextemal weak, smooth; chela fixed finger length/carapace length 0.95; movable fin- ger length/carapace length 1.26; dorsal and ex- ternal surfaces of chela palm moderately to strongly reticulate, with outer palm carinae well developed. Chela length/width ratio 2.86. Tar- somere II spine formula: 3/4 4/4: 4/4 4/4: 5/5 5/5: 5/5 5/5. Description.— Based on holotype male. Prosoma: Carapace (Fig. 1) base color dark orange brown with distinct dusky pattern. An- terior portion of carapace covered with medium- sized granules; area around ocular tubercle densely, finely granular; remainder of carapace sparsely granular. Coxostemal region yellow brown to light brown, lustrous. Sternum with about 9 pairs of setae; coxae sparsely setose. Mesosoma: Tergites brown, with distinct dusky pattern throughout. Tergites I-IV acarinate, V- VII weakly monocarinate, with median carina weak, smooth. Tergites I-II with minute granu- lation on lateral portions; III-VI with dense min- ute granulation interspersed with sparse, coarse granulation. Tergite VII moderately bilobed, with 122 SISSOM-NEW DIPLOCENTRUS FROM VERACRUZ, MEXICO 123 each lobe granulose. Pectines pale yellow, with 14-13 teeth. Stemites uniformly yellow brown; III-VI smooth, lustrous, moderately setose along lateral and posterior margins. Stemite VII tetra- carinate; lateral carinae moderate, unevenly smooth; submedian pair weaker, smooth; about 10 pairs of reddish setae present. Metasoma: Segments I-III dark orange brown; IV and V slightly darker than preceding seg- ments. Segment I 1 .09 times longer than wide; 11 1.33 times longer than wide; V 2.83 times longer than wide. Segments I-IV: Dorsolateral carinae strong, irregularly crenulate. Lateral su- pramedian carinae on I-III strong, granular; on IV moderate, subgranose. Lateral inframedian carinae weak on all four segments, irregularly granular. Ventrolateral carinae on I-II moderate, smooth; on III-IV moderate, granular. Ventral submedian carinae on I-III moderate, irregularly granular; on IV vestigial, with some granulation anteriorly. Intercarinal spaces with sparse, fine and coarse granulation. Segment V: (Fig. 2) Dis- tinctly narrower than segments I-IV, with lateral sides subparallel. Dorsolateral carinae moderate, granular. Lateromedian carinae vestigial, with a few sharp granules anteriorly. Ventrolateral, ven- tromedian, and ventral transverse carinae strong, with distinctly enlarged, subconical granules (Fig. 2). Dorsal intercarinal space with dense fine gran- ulation anteriorly; lateral intercarinal space sparsely, coarsely granular; ventral intercarinal spaces smooth, moderately setose. Telson: (Fig. 2) reddish to orange brown. Ven- tral surface of vesicle densely setose, proximally with numerous sharp granules. Subaculear tu- bercle strong, subconical, covered with setae and fine white microchaetes. Chelicerae: (Fig. 3) light yellow brown, lus- trous, with distinct dusky mottling on dorsal sur- face of manus; teeth dark reddish brown. Mov- able finger with subdistal tooth closely apposed to distal tooth. Pedipalps: Base color orange brown, femur lighter than patella and chela; distal end of chela manus and fingers infuscate. Trichobothrial pat- tern Type C, orthobothriotaxic (Vachon 1974). Femur: (Fig. 4) Dorsointemal and ventrointemal carinae strong, granulose; dorsoextemal carina strong, irregularly granulose proximally, smooth distally; ventroextemal carina obsolete. Internal surface moderately granulose; dorsal surface flat, moderately granular; ventral and external sur- faces smooth. Patella: (Fig. 5) Dorsal aspect with two smooth carinae; dorsointemal carina strong, dorsoextemal carina weak; ventrointemal carina moderate, granular; ventroextemal carina weak, smooth. Basal tubercle of inner surface moder- ate, followed distally by three to four large gran- ules; remainder of inner surface covered with moderately dense, fine granules. External surface relatively flat, with very weak reticulations. Ven- tral face slightly convex, essentially smooth. Che- la: (Figs. 6,7) Dorsal marginal carina strong, granulose; dorsal secondary carina weak, smooth; digital carina strong, smooth; external secondary carina weak, smooth; ventroextemal carina ob- solete basally, but strong on distal one-fourth of manus, smooth; ventromedian carina strong, es- sentially smooth; ventrointemal carina weak, smooth; two additional carinae on inner face, these vestigial, smooth to feebly granular. Dorsal and external faces of manus moderately reticu- late (Fig. 6), ridges smooth. Inner and ventral faces with irregular granulation and punctations. Dorsal and external surfaces of manus sparsely setose; internal and ventral surfaces moderately to densely setose; fixed and movable fingers densely setose. Inner margins of chela fingers with moderate scalloping. Legs: Contrasting in coloration with the body; proximal segments yellow brown; tarsi light yel- low. Measurements (of holotype, in mm): Total length, 62.2; carapace length 7.6; mesosoma length 1 7.8. Metasomal segments: I length/width, 4. 7/4. 3; II length/width, 5. 3/4.0; III length/width, 5. 5/3. 9; IV length/width, 6. 3/3. 5; V length/width, %.l/2.9. Telson length 6.8; vesicle length/width/ depth, 5.5/3. 1/2.5; aculeus length, 1.3. Chelic- erae: chela length/width, 2.24/1.77; fixed finger length, 1.23; movable finger length, 2.24. Pedi- palps: femur length/width, 1 patella length/ width, 1. 'i/2.1-, chela length/width/depth, 15.4/ 5. 4/3. 5; fixed finger length, 7.2; movable finger length, 9.5. Comparisons.— Diplocentrus perezi is most similar to D. mexicanus Peters. From this spe- cies, D. perezi may be distinguished by the fol- lowing characteristics; (1) carapacial granulation limited to area immediately surrounding anter- omedian notch; (2) lower tarsomere II spine for- mula (in D. mexicanus mexicanus 5/6 5/6: 6/6 6/7: 7/7 7/7: 7/7 7/7 and in D. mexicanus oax- acae Francke 5/6 5/6: 6/7 6/7: 7/8 7/8: 7/8 7/ 8); (3) the dorsal margin of the pedipalp chela is relatively straight in D. perezi, but noticeably 124 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 1-7.— Morphology of Diplocentrus perezi, new species: 1, dorsal aspect of carapace; 2, lateral aspect of metasomal segment V and telson; 3, dorsal aspect of right chelicera; 4, dorsal aspect of right pedipalp femur; 5, external aspect of right pedipalp patella; 6, external aspect of right pedipalp chela; 7, dorsal aspect of chela. Trichobothrial patterns are shown for pedipalpal structures. sinuous in D. mexicanus', (4) the dorsal carinae of the pedipalp patella are smooth in D. perezi, but granulose or subcrenate in D. mexicanus-, (5) the patellar et trichobothria form a distinct ob- tuse angle in D. perezi, but are almost in a linear arrangement in D. mexicanus-, and (6) in D. per- ezi, the ventrolateral and ventral submedian ca- rinae of metasomal segments I-IV are weaker than in D. mexicanus and smooth to irregularly granular, rather than distinctly granulose. Diplocentrus perezi may be easily distin- guished from D. tehuacanus Hoffmann, which is found in Puebla, Morelos, Guerrero, and Oaxaca by (1) the presence of two dorsal patellar carinae, rather than only one; (2) by having strong retic- ulations on the dorsal and external faces of the pedipalp chela (in D. tehuacanus, the reticula- tions are much weaker); (3) by having strong, costate dorsolateral metasomal carinae (in D. te- huacanus these are weak and smooth; (4) and by having well developed ventrolateral and ventral submedian carinae on metasomal segment IV (in D. tehuacanus the ventrolateral carinae are feeble and smooth and the ventral submedians more or less obsolete). There are also conspicuous morphometric differences: in D. perezi, the ped- SISSOM-NEW DIPLOCENTRUS FROM VERACRUZ, MEXICO 125 ipalp chela fingers and the individual metasomal segments are proportionately longer. Comments.— A subadult female specimen col- lected near Villahermosa, Tabasco, June 1985 by Gonzalo Perez-Higareda is possibly referable to this species. The tarsomere II spine formula for this female (4/4 4/4: 4/4 4/5: 5/5 5/5: 5/5 5/ 5) does not differ significantly from that of the male; the pectinal tooth count, 1 2-1 1 , is also very close to that of the male (female diplocentrids tend to have slightly lower counts than males). It differs significantly from the holotype male in that its pedipalp chelae are proportionately broader, deeper, and more convex, with the ca- rinae of the dorsal and external faces obsolete; its metasomal carinae are slightly weaker; and its carapace, pedipalps, and tergites are smooth and lustrous. The characters on which these dif- ferences are based are all known to be sexually dimorphic in the genus, and consequently should be interpreted with great caution. Given the ho- lotype male’s morphology in these characters, the predicted female morphology would be ex- actly that exhibited by the specimen from Ta- basco. However, the two specimens were col- lected in different habitats and at different altitudes: the female from lowlands and the ho- lotype male from wet forest at 1 300 m (G. Perez- Higareda, pers. comm., 1987). This leads to the suggestion, at least, that they may represent dif- ferent species. Because females of closely related, but different, species of Diplocentrus are difficult to distinguish, accurate determination of the spe- cies identity of the female cannot be provided until males are known from the Tabasco area. The female specimen is deposited in the collec- tion of the Estacion de Biologia “Los Tuxtlas”, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Catemaco, Veracruz. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful to G. Perez-Higareda of the In- stitute de Biologia Tropical Los Tuxtlas, Cate- maco, Veracruz for making the holotype of D. perezi and the female specimen from Tabasco available for study. N. 1. Platnick of the Amer- ican Museum of Natural History New York kindly allowed me to examine the holotype of Diplocentrus tehuacanus\ both he and H. W. Levi of the Museum of Comparative Zoology provid- ed other Diplocentrus material for comparative purposes. Page charges were paid with the assis- tance of a Faculty Research and Development grant from Elon College. LITERATURE CITED Francke, O. F. 1975. A new species of Diplocentrus from New Mexico and Arizona (Scorpionida, Di- plocentridae). J. Arachnol., 2:107-1 18. Francke, O. F. 1977a. Scorpions of the genus D/p/o- centrus from Oaxaca, Mexico (Scorpionida, Diplo- centridae). J. Arachnol., 4:145-200. Francke, O. F. 1977b. The genus Diplocentrus in the Yucatan Peninsula with description of two new trog- lobites (Scorpionida, Diplocentridae). Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 6:49-61. Francke, O. F. 1978. New troglobite scorpion of ge- nus Diplocentrus (Scorpionida: Diplocentridae). En- tomol. News, 89:39-45. Stahnke, H. L. 1970. Scorpion nomenclature and mensuration. Entomol. News, 81:297-316. Vachon, M. 1974. Etude des caracteres utilises pour classer les families et les genres de Scorpions. (Ar- achnides). Bull. Mus. Nat. d’Hist. nat., Paris, 3rd series. No. 140, Zool., 104:857-958. Manuscript received November 1990, revised January 1991. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:126-135 WHEN IS THE SEX RATIO BIASED IN SOCIAL SPIDERS?: CHROMOSOME STUDIES OF EMBRYOS AND MALE MEIOSIS IN ANELOSIMUS SPECIES (ARANEAE, THERIDIIDAE) Leticia Aviles': Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 USA and Department of Integrative Biology, University of Cal- ifornia, Berkeley California 94720 USA Wayne Maddison': Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berke- ley, California 94720 USA Abstract. Embryo chromosome preparations of four species of social spiders of the genus Anelosimus show that the two species known or suspected to form permanent, multigener- ational colonies, A. eximius and A. domingo, have a highly female-biased primary sex ratio. Anelosimus jucundus and A. studiosus, on the other hand, are shown to produce an even number of males and females. The magnitude of the bias of A. eximius embryos is similar to that reported for young preadult spiders of this species, therefore ruling out differential mortality of juveniles as the cause of this species’ sex ratio bias. Chromosome counts of nuclei in second division of A. eximius male meiosis indicate that nuclei destined to yield sons and daughters are produced in equal numbers. Therefore, the sex ratio biasing mech- anism in this species must act after male meiosis and before egg laying. The question of how early the sex ratio bias arises still needs to be resolved in other social spiders. We discuss some methodological and theoretical complications associated with measuring sex ratios at different stages of the life cycle and present a fast and reliable technique to obtain embryo chromosome preparations. The occurrence of highly female-biased sex ra- tios among adults of several species of social spi- ders has been known since the 1960’s (Buskirk 1981), but there has been little study of exactly when in the spiders’ life cycle the sex ratio bias arises. Knowledge of the timing of the sex ratio bias is important on at least two accounts: first, from an evolutionary point of view, it would help us determine whether differential parental in- vestment is involved in biasing the sex ratio; and, second, from a physiological point of view, it would bring us closer to identifying the mecha- nism by which the sex ratio bias is accomplished. Fisher’s principle (Fisher 1930) states that, at equilibrium, the total parental investment in off- spring of each sex should be equal. Departures from this equilibrium should bring about selec- tion to restore an even sex ratio because indi- viduals of the rare sex would have a reproductive advantage. Exceptions to Fisher’s sex ratio prin- ‘ Present address: Dept, of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA. ciple have been pointed out by Hamilton (1967), who first noted that biased sex ratios can evolve when the assumption of panmixia, implicit in Fisher’s argument, is violated. Parasitic and fig wasps (e.g., Werren 1980; Waage 1982; Herre 1985) and hummingbird-flower mites (Wilson and Colwell 198 1) are notable examples. As first noted by Aviles (1983, 1986), social spiders ap- pear to represent another case in which Fisher’s principle has been violated. In most social spi- ders, however, this violation has not been con- firmed because their sex ratio has been measured late enough in the spider’s life cycle (usually among adults) that higher male mortality during the preadult or adult instars cannot be ruled out as the cause of their sex ratio bias. As noted by several authors (Leigh 1970; Chamov 1982; Trivers 1985), if biased sex ratios are due solely to mortality occurring after the end of the period of parental investment then Fisher’s principle is not violated. In three species, Anelosimus exi- mius Keyserling, Achaearanea wau Levi and Ste- godyphus dumicola Pocock, there is indirect ev- idence that more females are actually being 126 AVILES & MADDISON- SOCIAL SPIDER SEX RATIO 127 produced. This evidence comes either from young-preadult sex ratios estimated in isolated natural colonies (Aviles 1983, 1986) or from preadult/adult sex ratios measured among in- dividuals raised under controlled conditions, ei- ther from egg sacs (Vollrath 1986b; Lubin and Crozier 1985; Lubin in press) or from a colony maintained in the laboratory (Seibt and Wickler 1988). These measurements provide evidence of an early bias, but may still be affected by mor- tality during the juvenile instars. In this paper we present a cytogenetic method that makes it possible to directly determine the sex of a developing embryo and, therefore, to measure the sex ratio before mortality becomes a factor. We apply this method to four species of the genus Aneiosimus Simon (Levi 1956, 1 963) present in Ecuador. Two of these, A. eximius and A. domingo Levi, are among the most social in the genus, with spiders that cooperate in prey capture and brood care and share a permanent communal nest generation after generation (A. eximius references: Brach 1975; Tapia & De Vries 1980; Christenson 1984; A. domingo references: Levi & Smith 1982; Rypstra & Tirey 1989). The other two, A. jucundus O. P.- Cambridge and A. studiosus Hentz, on the other hand, are known to exhibit a less advanced form of sociality where the offspring of a single female remain together for the early part of their life cycle but disperse before reaching adulthood (Brach 1977; Nentwig & Christenson 1986). Unlike A. eximius, A. ju- cundus and A. studiosus have been reported to have 1 : 1 preadult or adult sex ratios (Fowler & Levi 1979; Nentwig & Christenson 1986; Voll- rath 1986b reared offspring from two A. jucundus sacs and obtained an even sex ratio). Aneiosimus domingo sex ratios have not been previously re- ported. Should it be confirmed that the embryo sex ratios are biased, the next question to be an- swered is what is the mechanism by which the sex ratio bias arises. This question is of special interest in spiders because, unlike haplodiploid organisms that constitute most other known cases of extreme sex ratio biases (Hamilton 1967), spi- ders are diploid organisms with chromosomal sex determination and therefore lack the oppor- tunity to bias the sex ratio by choosing whether or not to fertilize the egg. In this paper we ex- amine the possibility that the earliest acting mechanism, a bias in male meiosis leading to the excess production of sperm destined to yield daughters, may occur in A. eximius. MATERIALS AND METHODS Chromosome preparations were obtained from embryos and males collected in Ecuador from naturally occurring colonies of the four Aneio- simus species. The sex of an embryo, or whether a nucleus in a spider testis is going to become a male- or a female-producing spermatozoid, can be determined cytologically thanks to the differ- ence in chromosome number between male and female spiders. The most common mechanism of sex determination in spiders involves two pairs of X chromosomes, with the two members of each pair present in females (X,X,X2X2) and only one in males (X,X20) (White 1973). The sex of an individual egg or of a developing spermato- zoid can therefore be simply determined by ob- taining its chromosome count. Aneiosimus eximius egg sacs were collected in July 1988 from two colonies, approximately 1.5 km apart, near the Recinto A. Perez Intriago, ICm 1 1 3, Quito - Pto. Quito road (0°6'N:79°5'W). Aneiosimus egg sacs were also collected near Per- ez Intriago in June 1989 from one colony found in a forest pocket near the Silanche river. Ane- iosimus jucundus sacs were collected from two colonies in Crucita, Manabi (0°52'S:80°33'W), in August 1988 and A. studiosus near Calderon, Pi- chincha (0°6'S:78°27'W), in July 1989. Males of the four species were collected from the same sites as the egg sacs, except that in addition one male of A. studiosus was collected from El Tingo, Pichincha (0°17'S:78°27'W). Egg sacs and males were brought alive to the laboratory where the preparations were made. The technique we developed to obtain chro- mosome preparations from individual eggs is de- scribed in the Appendix. Basically, it is much like typical acetic squash methods (e.g., Darling- ton & La Cour 1975) which stain then squash, except that it stains after squashing so as to yield much superior squashing. The stage of devel- opment of the eggs at the moment the sacs were collected was not known. However, we found that good preparations can be obtained from a wide range of stages, from very young embryos whose limb buds are just beginning to appear to older ones with well formed buds prior to the development of a cuticular covering. Once the cuticle has been formed, squashing is not as good and there are fewer dividing cells. All eggs in the A. domingo and A. eximius sacs that appeared to be developing normally were squashed (one to three eggs in the first three A. eximius sacs 128 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 1 Figure 1.— Metaphase I nucleus in A. eximius male meiosis. Note 10 acrocentric bivalents and two X chro- mosomes. Scale bar = 5 /irm. were lost due to mishandling). In A. studiosus, a random sample of around 30 eggs per sac was chosen. In A. jucundus, a similar sample size was chosen, though with the two egg sacs unevenly represented due to differences in their develop- mental stage. Sampling in A. jucundus could not be entirely random because the eggs in a sac were found to be widely asynchronous in their devel- opment and the ones that were obviously too old to yield good preparations were not squashed. Chromosomes were counted under 1 OOOX us- ing oil immersion. In the embryo preparations, nuclei with countable chromosomes were sought on the microscope slide until at least three were found with the same chromosome count of either 22 (the male diploid complement) or 24 (female); if three nuclei with 22 or 24 chromosomes could not be found, the egg was deemed unscorable. With few exceptions (see Table 1), around 90% of the preparations for a given sac could be scored. Since it is reasonable to suppose that the eggs scored were a random sample of the e^s squashed and since, with the only exception of A. jucundus, the eggs squashed were all or a random sample of those in a sac, the sex ratios obtained provide a direct estimation of the primary sex ratios of the species studied. Fewer than 90% percent of the preparations in the A. domingo sacs 1 and 4 could be scored because, when the sacs were first opened, the eggs were still too young to yield enough cells for scoring. After the first one or two eggs, these sacs were closed and the prepa- rations continued at a later date. In the case of A. jucundus, because of the asynchrony in the development of the eggs in a sac, some were too young or too old to yield good preparations. Chromosome preparations from testes were obtained by using one of three techniques: (a) Feulgen, as done by Maddison (1982), (b) squashing after staining with aceto-orcein, or (c) the same technique as that described for the eggs. One A. domingo, nine A. eximius, two A. jucun- dus and three A. studiosus males were examined 2 3 '4 / Ah. - M ^ r • • ^ \1 % • • 6 * ♦ ♦ /)> 1 Figures 2-4.— A. eximius embryo chromosomes: 2, male embryo (22 chromosomes); 3, 4, female embryos (24 chromosomes). Scale bar = 10 moi. AVILES & MADDISON-SOCIAL SPIDER SEX RATIO 129 Figures 5, 6. —Second division nuclei of /I. eximius male meiosis: 5, two Metaphase II nuclei; top has 12 chromosomes, bottom, 10; 6, two pairs of early Telophase II nuclei, top has 12 chromosomes each member of the pair, bottom, 10. Scale bar = 10 fim. to confirm the chromosome complements of the four species. The nine A. eximius males were further examined to investigate the possibility of a bias in male meiosis leading to the overpro- duction of XX-bearing spermatids. A. eximius slides were scanned systematically and all scor- able nuclei found, scored. Counts were made of either each second metaphase nucleus (Fig. 5) or of each pair of early second telophase nuclei, which nearly always occurred together (Fig. 6). Confidence limits for the proportions at the 95% level were obtained from binomial confidence Table 1.— Number of female and male embryos present in individual egg sacs of four species of the genus Anelosimus, as determined by their chromosome count: females, 24 chromosomes, and males, 22. The total number of eggs in a sac, the number squashed for chromosomes and, of those, the percent that yielded preparations whose chromosome count could be scored are given in columns 3-5. Species Sac no. Eggs Total Squashed % scorable Females Males A. domingo 1 16 16 81 12 1 2 13 13 92 11 1 3 14 14 93 12 1 4 15 15 73 10 1 A. eximius 1 51 43 91 35 4 2 45 44 89 37 2 3 53 50 88 39 5 4 51 51 92 42 5 A. jucundus 1 73 16 75 6 6 2 71 43 63 14 13 A. studiosus 1 39 31 94 15 14 2 47 30 83 13 12 130 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 2. — Primary sex ratio of four species of the genus Anelosimus reported as the proportion of male embryos contained in 2-4 egg sacs per species. Species No. sacs No. eggs Males Females Proportion males 95% c.i. A. domingo 4 50 4 45 0.08 0.02-0.19 A. eximius 4 172 16 153 0.09 0.05-0.14 A. jucundus 2 39 19 20 0.49 0.33-0.66 A. studiosus 2 54 26 28 0.48 0.34-0.62 interval graphs, as presented by Remington and Schork(1985). RESULTS Chromosome complement of Anelosimus spp. — Chromosome counts in male meiosis showed that the male diploid complement in all four species of Anelosimus examined is 20 autosomes + XXO (Fig. 1), the typical complement for the family Theridiidae (Suzuki 1954). Males, therefore, have 22 chromosomes, and females should have 24 chromosomes. As expected, developing eggs were found to have either 22 or 24 chromosomes in all four species examined (Figs. 2-4). The 20 autosomes, as well as the two X chromosomes, are acrocentrics. One male of A. studiosus showed an extra chromosome, possibly a supernumer- ary. Sex ratio of Anelosimus jucundus and A. studiosus were found to have an even primary sex ratio (Table 2), while the other two species, A. domingo and A. eximius, were found to have highly female biased primary sex ratios. Anelo- simus domingo egg sacs contained a single male out of 1 1 to 1 3 eggs and A. eximius sacs contained from 2 to 5 males out of 39 to 47 eggs (Table 1). The proportion of males found among embryos from the four egg sacs of A. domingo is 0.08 and of A. eximius, 0.09 (Table 2). All the eggs in the A. domingo sacs and in three of the A. eximius sacs were found to be develop- ing normally. One of the A. eximius sacs (#1) contained 1 dried up egg and 6 egg shells, most likely the remains of eggs eaten up by two hy- menopteran parasitic larvae found in the sac. Is the sex ratio biased by male meiosis?. — By the second division of male meiosis, nuclei des- tined to become male-producing sperm have 10 chromosomes, those destined to become female- producing sperm have 12. At telophase II (Fig. 6), the ratio of male-producing to female-pro- ducing nuclei was found to be very close to 1 ; 1 (ratio 0.49, A = 105 pairs, 95% confidence in- terval = 0.34-0.59), showing that male meiosis is not biased. In the earlier stage of metaphase II (Fig. 5) we obtained a slightly biased ratio (ratio 0.39, N = 57, 95% confidence interval = 0.270.53) which however was not significantly different from 1:1 (p > 0.11, by an exact two- tailed test based on the binomial probabilities). The slight bias observed in metaphase II is prob- ably due to sampling error given that the number of nuclei scored at this phase is smaller (57 vs. 105) and that at the later telophase II stage the two types of nuclei occur in even numbers. DISCUSSION This study shows that the sex ratio among de- veloping embryos of two of the most social spe- cies of the genus Anelosimus, A. eximius and A. domingo, is highly female biased. The bias in A. eximius is of the same magnitude as that pre- viously reported from preadult individuals of this species (Aviles 1986 and unpublished data) and from individuals raised from eggs (Vollrath 1986b). This shows that differential mortality of the sexes during the juvenile instars is not re- sponsible for the sex ratio bias and that the bias results from an overproduction of females by the time the eggs are laid. The sex ratio is therefore biased throughout the life cycle, and parental in- vestment in A. eximius, as in A. domingo, is heavily skewed towards females. This removes any doubts that this bias represents a violation of Fisher’s principle, on the one hand, and push- es back the moment at which the sex ratio biasing mechanism must act to the period previous to egg laying. In the other two species, A. jucundus and A. studiosus, even primary sex ratios were found. The difference in sex ratio between A. jucundus and 4. studiosus, on the one hand, and 4. eximius and A. domingo, on the other, is consistent with what is known about the mating system and pop- AVILES & MADDISON-SOCIAL SPIDER SEX RATIO 131 ulation structure of these species. Anelosimus ju- cundus and A. studiosus form colonies that dis- integrate before its members (usually the progeny of a single female) reach adulthood (Brach 1977; Nentwig & Christenson 1986; Aviles unpub- lished). Therefore, mating in these species takes place among individuals from the population at large and, as observed, an even sex ratio is ex- pected. The colonies of A. eximius, on the other hand, as a consequence of permanent sociality, constitute isolated lineages whose members re- produce by inbreeding generation after genera- tion (Overal & Ferreira 1982; Vollrath 1982; Smith 1982; Aviles 1983, 1986). According to a model proposed (Aviles 1983, 1986, in prep.), the isolated descent of many small lineages and their rapid turnover rate would bring about the conditions under which selection at the colony level can override fisherian selection within col- onies, making female-biased sex ratios evolu- tionarily stable (see Frank 1987 for a different model). The population structure of the fourth species, A. domingo, is not yet known. However, cooperation in this species extends through adulthood (Rypstra & Tirey 1989) and multiple egg-laying females and spiders of all instars occur in the colonies (Aviles unpublished), suggesting that sociality is permanent and that mating takes place within the parental colony, as occurs in A. eximius. The strongly female biased sex ratios here reported lead us to predict that the popu- lation structure of this species will also be found to be highly subdivided and that the conditions that favor the evolution of female biased sex ra- tios in A. eximius are also present in A. domingo. One of the questions opened by the present study has to do with the mechanism by which such a large overproduction of females is accom- plished. This study rules out early death of em- bryos as a possible mechanism since, with the only exception of one sac, all eggs in the A. ex- imius and A. domingo sacs examined were de- veloping normally and almost all were scored. The biasing mechanism must therefore act dur- ing the period previous to the deposition of the eggs. Our results also show that a bias in male meiosis, the earliest acting possible mechanism, does not occur in A. eximius: by telophase II, nuclei destined to give rise to female- and male- producing sperm occur in equal numbers. This leaves the following stages as possible targets during wich the biasing mechanism can act: the final stages of spermatogenesis, sperm induction. transfer of sperm to the female spermatheca, sperm activation in the spermatheca previous to the fertilization of the eggs, and fertilization it- self. Once the eggs have been fertilized, the sex ratio must be already determined, since, as Voll- rath (1986b) points out, reabsorption of male zygotes is not likely given that the sperm is added to the eggs as they are being laid. Some form of sperm selection, involving either differential death of sperm, differential activation or sperm competition, appears the most likely mecha- nism. The question of when the sex ratio is biased still needs to be resolved in other social spiders. Outside Anelosimus, with the already mentioned exceptions of Achaearanea wau and Stegodyphus dumicola for which rearing experiments have been conducted, sex ratios in other social spiders have only been measured in adults (Jackson & Smith 1978; Riechert et al. 1986), in some com- bination of adults and subadults (Pain 1964; Kullman et al. 1971) or in some unspecified in- star, presumably mature individuals (Darchen 1967; Main 1988; Jacson & Joseph 1973; Seibt & Wickler 1988 for 5. mimosarum Pavesi). As already mentioned, adult sex ratios are not suf- ficient evidence that parental investment is bi- ased, and, therefore, that Fisher’s principle has been violated. When compared with data taken at earlier stages, adult sex ratio data can never- theless be useful as evidence that sex specific mortality or migration occurs. However, because in spiders males often mature at least one molt earlier than females, measuring adult sex ratio is much more involved than has been generally re- garded. In social spiders, as in any other species in which generations are discrete, either due to seasonality or to recent establishment of the pop- ulation or colony by just a few founders (Bradoo 1972; Darchen 1978; Lubin & Robinson 1982; Aviles 1986; Main 1988; Seibt & Wickler 1988), the difference in the number of molts makes the proportion of adult males to adult females de- pendent on the point in the colony life cycle at which the sample is collected (e.g., see fig. 3 of Aviles 1986). This might explain why some au- thors have obtained some instances of male bi- ased sex ratios (e.g., Vollrath 1986a,b; Riechert et al. 1986, pp. 185, 186; Main 1988, p. 66), the large variability found by most authors (Pain 1964; Bradoo 1975; Jacson & Joseph 1973; Riechert et al. 1986; Vollrath 1986a,b; Seibt & Wickler 1988), and the differences among them. 132 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY To solve this problem one might measure adult sex ratio as the proportion of adult males vs. the chronologically equivalent preadult female in- star. However, because of the different times the sexes remain in those instars, this estimate is biased against females (female spiders are only temporarily in the preadult instar until molting to adulthood while males of several cohorts ac- cumulate in the adult instar). In general, the per- sistence time in a particular instar should always be taken into consideration when any two stages in a life cycle are compared by vertical sampling. The measurement that would more fairly com- pare all males and females of the same cohort would have to count adult males vs. females of the same and all older instars to which they molt while males are still around. However, even this estimate would vary depending upon when in the colony life cycle the sample was collected, if males migrate or die earlier than females. For these reasons, at the moment we do not have good evidence of what the magnitude of the sex ratio bias is in other social spiders or whether it represents a theoretically interesting bias. Given our current knowledge about the social behavior and population structure of other social spiders, however, our prediction is that their adult sex ratio bias will also be found to result from uneven parental investment. This prediction can now be easily tested using the cytogenetic tech- nique that we present here. It should be noted, however, that in species in which parental care extends beyond conception, measuring sex ratio in embryos will not necessarily tell us all we want to know about parental investment. Whether or not biased at conception, the proportion of male to female offspring, or their relative sizes, may change during the period of parental care as a result of differential mortality or differential al- location of resources. To determine whether this is the case, the sex ratio at the end of the period of parental investment should also be estimated. In social spiders, parental investment can be pre- sumed to end at the instar at which the spider- lings start to participate in the activities of the colony and are therefore less dependent on the parental generation (in A. eximius, this occurs at about the same time when males are first rec- ognizable due to their enlarged palpi, Aviles 1986). If this young preadult sex ratio is found to be different from the embryo sex ratio, then parental investment would need to be estimated by integrating the numbers of male and female offspring and the per capita investment in them over the period of parental care. If the sex ratio values are the same, and no size difference be- tween the sexes is obvious, as has been found to be the case in A. eximius , then the investment ratio can be estimated from the numerical ratio either among embryos or among young pread- ults. In studies in which the sex ratio of a large number of colonies needs to be estimated, mea- suring the preadult sex ratio may be the only feasible alternative. The preadult sex ratio, how- ever, is probably more subject to empirical error because, through time, random mortality or asynchrony in the development times of the sex- es would tend to increase the variance of the sex ratio estimate. Aside from being perhaps more accurate, embryo sex ratios have the additional advantage of allowing an assessment of whether there is variation for the sex ratio among the progeny of different females (given that eggs of a clutch are laid together in a sac). The importance of knowing the primary sex ratio is certainly not limited to social spiders since issues of sex ratio and population structure, sex specific demographic phenomena and sex ra- tio variation are of general interest in spider bi- ology. The cytogenetic technique that we present here greatly simplifies the estimation of the pri- mary sex ratio in spiders. It not only has obvious advantages over time consuming egg-rearing techniques which risk producing a biased esti- mate if there is mortality (Fiala 1980), but it also has several advantages over a previously de- scribed technique for obtaining spider embryo chromosomes (Matsumoto 1977; Tugmon et al. 1 990): it allows reliable preparation of individual eggs and it is fast enough that population studies become feasible. This technique has already been successfully used in mites (M. Kaliszewski pers. comm.) and it can probably be used with equal success in other arthropods (see Crozier 1968 for a more laborious technique used for insect pu- pae). Widespread use of this technique will make available quantitative sex ratio estimates of a phylogenetically diverse set of species, so that comparative studies to test specific predictions of sex ratio and population structure become possible. Should primary sex ratio biases be con- firmed in the social species for which biased adult sex ratios have been reported, we would then be faced with the interesting question of how species in five different spider families (Agelenidae, Dyctinidae, Eresidae, Theridiidae and Thomis- AVILES & MADDISON-SOCIAL SPIDER SEX RATIO 133 idae) have solved the common problem of de- vising a mechanism by which to beat the odds imposed by the meiotic process (Williams 1 979). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are very grateful for the support and the laboratory facilities provided by the Dept, of Bi- ology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Ec- uador and the Museo Ecuatoriano de Ciencias Naturales, where most of the chromosome slides were prepared. G. Estevez assisted in the field and in the laboratory, and J. Campana, in part of the chromosome scoring; we thank them both for their diligence and enthusiasm. J. Patton and the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology generously allowed us to use their cytogenetics lab at U. C. Berkeley to carry out most of the scoring and photographic work. M. Slatkin provided us shel- ter. A. Rypstra, F. Vollrath and O. Krauss re- viewed a previous version of the manuscript and gave valuable comments for its improvement. This work was supported by grants from the Na- tional Geographic Society (#38 1 2-88), Sigma Xi, and Harvard University (OEB graduate student grants) to L. Aviles, and by an NSERC Canada postdoctoral fellowship to W. Maddison. LITERATURE CITED Aviles, L. 1983. Proporcion de sexos en la arana social Anelosimus eximius. Licenciatura thesis, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador, Quito. Aviles, L. 1986. Sex ratio bias and possible group selection in the social spider Anelosimus eximius. Am. Nat., 128:1-12. Brach, V. 1975. The biology of the social spider A ne- losimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae). Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci., 74:37^1. Brach, V. 1977. Anelosimus studiosus (Araneae: Theridiidae) and the evolution of quasisociality in Theridiid spiders. Evolution, 31:154-161. Bradoo, B. L. 1972. Some observations on the ecol- ogy of social spider Stegodyphus sarasinorum Karsch (Araneae: Eresidae) from India. Oriental Insects, 6: 193-204. Bradoo, B. L. 1975. The sexual biology and mor- phology of the reproductive organs of Stegodyphus sarasinorum Karsch (Araneae: Eresidae). Entomol. Monthly Mag., 111:239-247. Buskirk, R. 1981. Sociality in the Arachnida. Pp. 281-359, In Social Insects (H. R. Hermann, ed.) vol. II. Academic Press, New York. Chamov, E. 1982. The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Christenson, T. 1 984. Behaviour of colonial and sol- itary spiders of the theridiid species Anelosimus ex- imius. Anim. Behav., 32:725-734. Crozier, R. H. 1968. An acetic acid dissociation, air- drying technique for insect chromosomes, with ace- to-lactic orcein staining. Stain Technology, 43: 1 7 1- 173. Darlington, C. D. & L. F. La Cour. 1975. The Han- dling of Chromosomes, Sixth Ed., Wiley and Sons, New York. Darchen, R. 1967. Une nouvelle araignee sociale du Gabon Agelena republicana Darchen. Biol. Gabon- ica, 3:31-42. Darchen, R. 1978. Les essaimages de I’araignee so- ciale, Agelena consociata Denis, dans la foret ga- bonaise. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. Ser. D Sci. Nat. 287:1035-1037. Fiala, K. 1980. On estimating the primary sex ratio from incomplete data. Am. Nat., 1 15:442-^44. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Dover, New York. Fowler, H. G. & H. W. Levi. 1979. A new quasisocial Anelosimus spider (Araneae: Theridiidae) from Par- aguay. Psyche, 86:1 1-17. Frank, S. 1987. Demography and sex ratio in social spiders. Evolution, 41:1267-1281. Hamilton, W. D. 1 967. Extraordinary sex ratios. Sci- ence, 156:477-488. Herre, E. A. 1985. Sex ratio adjustment in fig wasps. Science, 228:896-898. Jackson, R. R. & S. E. Smith. 1978. Aggregations of Mallos and Dictyna (Araneae: Dictynidae): popu- lation characteristics. Psyche, 85:65-80. Jacson, C. C. & K. J. Joseph. 1973. Life history, bionomics and behaviour of the social spider Ste- godyphus sarasinorum. Insectes Sociaux, 20:189- 203. Kullman, E., St. Nawabi & W. Zimmermann. 1971. Neue Ergebnisse zur Brutbiologie cribellater Spin- nen aus Afghanistan und der Serengeti. Zeitschr. Kolner Zoo, 14:87-108. Leigh, E. 1970. Sex ratio and differential mortality between the sexes. Am. Nat., 104:205-206. Levi, H. W. 1956. The spider genera Neottiura and Anelosimus in America (Araneae: Theridiidae). Trans. Amer. Micros. Soc., 75:407^22. Levi, H. W. 1963. The American spiders of the genus Anelosimus (Araneae, Theridiidae). Trans. Amer. Micros. Soc., 82:30-48. Levi, H. W. & D. R. Smith. 1982. A new colonial Anelosimus spider from Suriname (Araneae: Ther- idiidae). Psyche, 89:3-4. Lubin, Y. D. in press. Patterns of variation in female- biased sex ratios in a social spider. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. Lubin, Y. D. & R. H. Crozier. 1985. Electrophoretic evidence for population differentiation in a social spider Achaearanea wau (Theridiidae). Insectes So- ciaux, 32:297-304. Lubin, Y. D. & M. H. Robinson. 1982. Dispersal by swarming in a social spider. Science, 216:319-321. Main, B. Y. 1988. The biology of a social thomisid 134 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY spider. Australian Arachnology [Austral. Ent. Soc. Misc. PubL, Brisbane], 5:55-73. Maddison, W. 1982. XXXY sex chromosomes in males of the jumping spider genus Pellenes (Ara- neae: Salticidae). Chromosoma (Berl.), 85:23-37. Matsumoto, S. 1977. An observation of somatic chromosomes from spider embryo-cells. Acta Ar- achnol., 27:167-172. Nentwig, W. & T. Christenson. 1986. Natural history of the non-solitary sheetweaving spidzr Anelosimus jucundus (Araneae: Theridiidae). Zool. J. Linnean Soc., 87:27-35. Overal, W. L. & P. R. Ferreira da Silva. 1982. Pop- ulation dynamics of the quasisocial spider Anelo- simus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae). Pp. 181-182, In The biology of Social Insects (M. E. Breed, C. D. Michener & H. E. Evans, eds). Proc. of the IX Congr. Int. Union for the Study of Social Insects, Boulder, Colorado. Pain, J. 1964. Premieres observations sur une espece nouvelle d’araignees sociales, Agelena consociata. Biol. Gabonica, 1:47-58. Remington, R. D. & M. A. Schork. 1985. Statistics with Applications to the Biological and Health Sci- ences. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Riechert, S., R. Roeloffs & A. C. Echtemacht. 1986. The ecology of the cooperative spider Agelena con- sociata in Equatorial Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). J. Arachnol., 14:175-191. Rypstra, A. L. & R. S. Tirey. 1989. Observations on the social spider, Anelosimus domingo (Araneae, Theridiidae), in southwestern Peru. J. Arachnol., 17: 368. Seibt, U. & W. Wickler. 1988. Bionomics and social structure of “Family Spiders” of the genus Stego- dyphus, with special reference to the African species S. dumicola and S', mimosarum (Araneidae, Eresi- dae). Verb, naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg, 30:255-303. Smith, D. R. 1982. Population genetics oi Anelosi- mus eximius (Araneae, Theridiidae). J. Arachnol., 14:201-217. Suzuki, S. 1954. Cytological studies in spiders. III. Studies on the chromosomes of fifty-seven species of spiders belonging to seventeen families, with gen- eral considerations on chromosomal evolution. J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ., ser. B, 15:23-136. Tapia, Y. & T. De Vries. 1980. Tolerancia y coop- eracion en la arana social Anelosimus jucundus del bosque tropical Rio Palenque, Ecuador. Rev. de la Univ. Catolica Quito, VII(27):5 1-74. Trivers, R. 1985. Social Evolution. The Benjamin/ Cummings Publishing Company, Inc. Tugmon, C., J. D. Brown & N. V. Homer. 1990. Karyotypes of seventeen USA spider species (Ara- neae, Araneidae, Gnaphosidae, Loxoscelidae, Ly- cosidae, Oxyopidae, Philodromidae, Salticidae and Theridiidae). J. Arachnol., 18:41-48. Vollrath, F. 1982. Colony foundation in a social spi- der. Z. Tierpsychol., 60:313-324. Vollrath, F. 1986a. Environment, reproduction and the sex ratio of the social spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae, Theridiidae). J. Arachnol., 14:266-281. Vollrath, F. 1986b. Eusociality and extraordinary sex ratios in the spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae). Behav. Ecol. SociobioL, 18:283-287. Waage, J. K. 1 982. Sib-mating and sex ratio strategies in scelionid wasps. Ecol. Entomol., 7:103-1 12. Werren, J. H. 1980. Sex ratio adaptations to local mate competition in a parasitic wasp. Science, 208: 1157-1159. White, M. J. 1973. Animal cytology and evolution, 3rd. ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Williams, G. C. 1979. The question of adaptive sex ratio in outcrossed vertebrates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 205:567-580. Wilson, D. S. & R. K. Colwell. 1981. Evolution of sex ratio in structured demes. Evolution, 35:882- 897. Manuscript received August 1990, revised February 1991. APPENDIX PROTOCOL TO OBTAIN SPIDER EMBRYO CHROMOSOME PREPARATIONS 1. Fix the egg. With a very fine needle, poke a small hole in the egg and with the egg so skewered, place it in a drop of fixative (3 parts absolute ethanol: 1 part glacial acetic acid). We used electrochemically-sharp- ened tungsten wire needles. Limb buds, if present, ap- pear as a series of small white lumps as the fixative enters the egg (a black background enhances visibility). Remove the tip of the needle from the egg, and press on the side of the egg so as to force the contents through the small hole. If the egg is young enough the contents can be squirted into a long thin string, which aids in rapid fixing and later in breaking the contents in small pieces. Tissue with nuclei is white; yolk without nuclei is yellowish; if there is much yolk then some can be discarded. Discard the empty chorion. Fix for 30 sec- onds. 2. Squash the tissue. Place the fixed contents of the egg in a small drop of 60% acetic acid on a microscope slide. With two very fine needles, break the tissue into small pieces. Place a cover slip on top, and squash the tissue flat. This squashing is perhaps the most critical step in the procedure: squashing too softly, sliding the cover slip sideways while squashing, and air bubbles should all be avoided. 3. Remove the cover slip and let dry the tissue. Freeze the slide on dry ice at least several minutes and flip the cover slip off with a razor blade. Wash off the acetic acid for 20 seconds in a bath of absolute ethanol. Let AVILES & MADDISON-SOCIAL SPIDER SEX RATIO 135 the slide dry at least ten minutes. If needed, the slide can be left in this condition overnight or longer. 4. Stain the tissne and make permanent the prepa- ration. After the slide has dried well, it can be stained and made permanent. No doubt many different stains could be used; we have used primarily a 3-4 minute bath of acetocarmine. After staining, the slide can be rinsed with appropriate solvents to prepare it for per- manent mounting. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:136-149 ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE PRIMARY MALE GENITAL SYSTEM, SPERMATOZOA, AND SPERMIOGENESIS OF HYPOCHILUS POCOCKI (ARANEAE, HYPOCHILIDAE) Gerd Alberti: Institute of Zoology I, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 230, D-6900 Heidelberg, F.R.G. Frederick A. Coyle: Department of Biology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina 28723 USA Abstract. Spermiogenesis and the ultrastructure of the testes, vasa deferentia, and sper- matozoa of Hypochilus pococki, a palaeocribellate spider, are described. The sperm exhibit many character states apparently plesiomorphic for spiders (an acrosomal complex com- posed of a cone-shaped acrosomal vacuole and an acrosomal filament running to the end of a nuclear canal, a postcentriolar nuclear elongation, an axonema with a 9x2 -f- 3 pattern, centrally located mitochondria, and a rolling-up of the nucleus and flagellum at the end of spermiogenesis) and two states that may be synapomorphic for araneomorphs (a stout nucleus and a very pronounced nuclear elongation). The spermatozoa are delivered as cleistospermia (individual spherical sperm cells each encapsulated in a secretory sheath). It is argued that, for spiders, coenospermia are plesiomorphic and cleistospermia apomorphic. The considerable effort devoted to under- standing relationships among spider families has produced varying views on the higher classifi- cation of spiders. The most commonly accepted classification scheme is that developed by Plat- nick and Gertsch (1976) and Platnick (1977), and further supported and developed by Forster et al. (1987) and Coddington (1990). These cladistic analyses favor a classification of spiders into two suborders: Mesothelae and Opisthothelae, with the latter composed of two groups, Mygalomor- phae and Araneomorphae. The araneomorphs contain the Paleocribellatae (consisting only of the Hypochilidae) and its sister group, the Neo- cribellatae (containing all other araneomorphs). Examples of alternative views are those of 1) Lehtinen (1967, 1978, 1986), who has argued that mygalomorphs are more closely related to the Mesothelae than to araneomorphs and that the Araneomorphae is probably not monophyletic (in particular he suggests that a cribellum might have evolved independently in the filistatids) and 2) Eskov and Zonshtein (1990), whose recent cla- distic analysis causes them to classify spiders into two suborders which are very different from those of Platnick and Gertsch (1976), i.e.; the Orthog- natha (including the Liphistiomorphae, Thera- phosomorphae, and Filistatomorphae) and the Labidognatha (including the Geralycosomor- phae, Dysderomorphae, Hypochilomorphae, and Araneomorphae). Since the discovery by Franzen (1956) that sperm morphology is correlated with mode of insemination, it has become evident that sperm ultrastructure provides a rich source of charac- ters for testing hypotheses of relationship (see e.g.; Baccetti and Afzelius 1976, Franzen 1977, Afzelius 1979, Baccetti 1979, 1985). Our knowl- edge of spider sperm ultrastructure has increased considerably since the classic paper of Osaki (1969) (Baccetti 1970; Reger 1970; Rosati et al. 1970; Osaki 1972; Boissin 1973; Lopez & Boissin 1976; Juberthie et al. 1981; Lopez et al. 1983; Al- berti & Weinmann 1985; Alberti et al. 1986). It is of particular interest that four types of sperm packaging have been found in spiders: 1) coe- nospermia (capsules containing many individual unfused sperm cells), 2) cleistospermia (individ- ual sperm cells, each surrounded by its own sheath), 3) synspermia (several fused sperm cells forming a syncytium which is surrounded by a sheath), and 4) so-called “spermatophores” (tubes of secretion containing a row of highly ordered individual sperm cells) (see Alberti 1990). Coenospermia have been found electron mi- croscopically in Mesothelae, Mygalomorphae, and Filistatidae (Alberti & Weinmann 1985; Al- berti et al. 1986; Alberti 1990). (Although Tuz- 136 ALBERTI & COYLE-SPERM ULTRASTRUCTURE OF HYPOCHILUS 137 et and Manier [1959] described in the clubionid, Cheiracanthium sp., a “spermatophore” which clearly represents a coenospermium, Alberti (1990) could find only cleistospermia in Cheir- acanthium punctorium.) Synspermia have been observed only in certain haplogyne families (Se- gestriidae, Dysderidae, Scytodidae, and Loxos- celidae) (Alberti & Weinmann 1985; Alberti (1990). The curious “spermatophores” have only been found in Telemidae (Juberthie et al. 1981), but may also be present in some other families (e.g., Oonopidae, Tetrablemmidae; Brignoli 1978). Cleistospermia have been found in all other ar- aneomorph spiders which have been examined. The Hypochilidae, which is universally re- garded as a primitive taxon and believed by many to be the sister group of all other araneomorph spiders, is of special importance in understand- ing spider phylogeny. In the following we de- scribe, for the first time, the ultrastructure of spermiogenesis, sperm cells, testes, and vasa de- ferentia of a hypochilid, Hypochilus pococki Plat- nick, and discuss some of the phylogenetic im- plications of these results, with special attention to the evolutionary polarity of modes of sperm packaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three adult males of H. pococki were collected on 9 October 1989 near Wolf Creek, 8 km south of Cullowhee, Jackson Co., North Carolina. On 10 October the specimens were dissected and fixed in cold 3.5% glutaraldehyde buffered at pH 7.4 (Sorensen-phosphate buffer) for 2 hours. The fixative was then diluted with buffer solution (1: 4) and in this state the tissues were mailed to Heidelberg where the specimens were rinsed with buffer and postfixed for 2 hours with 2% buffered OSO4 solution. Following further rinsing with buffer the material was dehydrated with graded ethanols and embedded in Araldite using pro- pylenoxide as an intermedium. Ultrathin sec- tions were obtained using a Reichert OM-U2 ultramicrotome. The sections were stained with uranylacetate and lead citrate and were observed with a Zeiss EM lOCR electron miroscope. RESULTS Testes.— The massive, elongate paired testes are located ventrally in the opisthosoma. Sper- miogenesis begins in cysts containing numerous germ cells in the same stage of development. Later the cysts become less compact and may be confluent (Figs. 1 , 2). These cysts are formed by extensions of large somatic cells characterized by their irregular shape, interdigitations with neigh- boring somatic cells, and numerous desmosomes (Figs. 3-5, 24). Each somatic cell also contains a large, irregularly shaped, electron lucent nucle- us, numerous conspicuous cistemae of rough ER, dictyosomes, several small mitochondria, and various inclusions which are probably lyso- somes. Some somatic cells are quite dense and show signs of degeneration (dilated ER cistemae, disintegrating cell apex, etc.) (Fig. 4). Narrow extensions of the somatic cells reach between germ cells only in an early stage of development. Each testis is underlain by a thick basal lamina supported by a similarly thick layer of collage- nous fibres, and a muscularis adjacent to the hae- mocoel (Fig. 3). Vasa deferentia. — In the proximal parts of the vasa deferentia, which are continuous with the distal parts of the testes, the epithelial cells are similar to the somatic cells of the testes, and the basal components (basal lamina, collagenous layer, muscularis) are similarly present. The lu- men of the proximal region contains a homo- geneous secretion and coiled spermatozoa which are not yet surrounded by a secretory sheath. This encystment occurs in the distal vas deferens where the secretory activity is much higher. The lumen here in the distal portion is filled with a densely staining material, aggregates of granules and spheres, and streaks which probably consist of the same material that forms the sheaths of the sperm cells (Figs. 6, 10). Large nuclei with folded surfaces, cistemae of rough ER, many dic- tyosomes, and secretory vesicles are conspicuous in the epithelial cells. The apical surface of these cells is provided with microvilli with many small vesicles at their bases. Laterally these cells are connected by extensive junctional complexes (Fig. 6). The basal plasmalemma of the cells is folded and attached via hemidesmosomes to a rather thin basal lamina (Fig. 7). The collagenous layer is also thinner than in the testis. Within the mus- cularis are many nerve endings (Fig. 8). Spermatozoa. — The mature spermatozoa found in the distal vas deferens are spherical (Fig. 9) and each one is encapsulated in a multilayered 0.3 Mm thick secretory sheath. The following structures are observable in each sperm cell: Acrosomal complex: The acrosomal com- plex is composed of an acrosomal vacuole (or vesicle) in the shape of an elongate hollow cone and an acrosomal filament (Figs. 11, 12). The acrosomal vacuole is located at the anterior end 138 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 1, 2.— Spermiogenesis in Hypochilus pocockL 1, part of a cyst within the testis containing spermatids in a very early stage of spermiogenesis. Note that cells are densely packed (arrows point to flagella of spermatids located within narrow intercellular clefts). Chromatin condensation has just started. Acrosomal vacuoles are already dense. X6,300. 2, advanced stages of spermiogenesis (compare Fig. 20). Cytoplasm of the spermatids is rather electron lucent. Note extensive intercellular spaces between spermatids and nearly mature spermatozoa (upper left). X4,000. AV = acrosomal vacuole, N = nucleus. of the nucleus, runs parallel to the cell surface, and does not protrude from the cell body. The contents of the acrosomal vacuole are rather ho- mogeneous and electron dense; only the inner- most region shows distinct layers (Fig. 1 2). The acrosomal filament, composed of many (actin?) subfibers (Figs. 12, 22, 23), is rather thick and runs through the subacrosomal space into the nuclear canal down to its end (Figs. 11, 13). Nucleus: The nucleus is the most prominent structure of the sperm cell and is bent upon itself. The main part of the nucleus is rather stout, it describes approximately two-thirds of a circle within the capsule (Fig. 9), and its convex pe- ALBERTI & COYLE-SPERM ULTRASTRUCTURE OF HYPOCHILUS 139 Figures 3-5.— Spermiogenesis in Hypochilus pococki: 3, somatic cells from the testis close to proximal part of vas deferens. Arrows point to basal lamina, arrow heads to collagenous layer. X6,300. 4, margin of cyst which contains nearly mature spermatozoon. Note dense (degenerating) somatic cell (arrow). X12,600. 5, dictyosome and rough ER close to nucleus of somatic cell. X20,000. D = dictyosome, ER = rough endoplasmic reticulum, MU = muscle cell, N = nucleus, NO = nucleolus, SP = spermatozoon. 140 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 6-8.— Spermiogenesis in Hypochilus pococki: 6, distal vas deferens containing dense secretion. Note irregularly shaped nucleus, numerous vesicles, and extensive cell junctions (arrow heads). X9,450. 7, basal region ALBERTI & COYLE-SPERM ULTRASTRUCTURE OF HYPOCHILUS 141 ripheral surface is smooth whereas its concave, centrally directed surface is folded. The nucleus extends beyond the axonemal base as a flattened, so-called postcentriolar, nuclear elongation which completes the circle and continues parallel to the acrosomal vacuole reaching even behind the ax- onemal base (Figs. 9, 11, 13). The nuclear elon- gation is thus rather long (about one complete circle). The close apposition of the nuclear elon- gation to the acrosomal vacuole is quite distinc- tive (Figs. 11, 13). The nucleus contains a pe- ripheral canal which curves around its whole length and contains the acrosomal filament (Figs. 11, 13). Axonema: The implantation fossa, which is moderately deep, includes, in front of the cen- trioles, a homogeneous material (centriolar ad- junct) and numerous small granules, presumably glycogen (Figs. 9, 11, 13). The axonemal base is marked by dense material which is opposed to the peripheral tubules (Figs. 14, 16). The center of the distal centriole includes three dense fibers which are continuous with the dense material connecting the three central tubules of the axo- nema, which thus exhibits the 9x2+3 pattern typical for most spiders (Figs. 14-17). The ax- onema, which lacks a flagellar membrane, de- scribes four to five coils within the cell body (Figs. 13, 17). The A-tubules are denser proxi- mally than distally (Fig. 17). Only in the very distal part of the axonema are the central tubules lacking. Additional components: Some mitochondria are found in the center of the cell together with irregularly arranged dense streaks (Figs. 9, 11, 1 3). These streaks are probably condensed mem- branes as is indicated by younger stages of sperm development (see below; Fig. 24). Regions of cy- toplasm devoid of organelles are studded with moderately dense granules, which most likely represent ^S-gly cogen (Fig. 9). Spermiogenesis.— Young spermatids at the beginning of chromatin condensation are densely packed cells with spherical nuclei. The acrosomal vacuole was already present in the stages we ob- served and is located opposite a region of the nucleus where chromatin condensation starts (Figs. 1, 18). The acrosomal vacuole is slightly inclined against the long axis of the cell and the acrosomal filament thus runs obliquely into the nuclear canal (Fig. 1 8). The nucleus is surround- ed by a manchette of microtubules. Opposite the acrosomal vacuole the nucleus invaginates to form the implantation fossa (Figs. 19, 21). At this pole of the cell, the mitochondria have as- sembled. The flagellum extends into the inter- cellular clefts left between the developing sper- matids which are interconnected by narrow cell bridges (Fig. 1). Some extensions of somatic cells are also visible between the spermatids. In a later stage, the nucleus narrows somewhat towards its anterior end (Fig. 1 9). The acrosomal vacuole is basally surrounded by a girdle of dense material to which the manchette microtubules are attached (Figs. 20, 22). The implantation fos- sa is quite deep and includes the centrioles in a tandem orientation (Fig. 21). The chromatin is filamentous now. The surface of the cell becomes irregular and between the cells are found more extensive intercellular spaces containing a het- erogeneous material (Figs. 2, 20). It appears as if large quantities of cytoplasmic material are discarded from the spermatids, predominately from those regions which are close to the cell bridges. These discarded “blebs” often include large complexes of cistemae in different stages of destruction (Fig. 21). In this stage the cells have already elongated and the nucleus exhibits a prominent nuclear elongation (Fig. 20). The flagellum is partly sunk- en into the cell and is consequently surrounded by an invagination of the flagellum to form a so- called flagellar tunnel (Figs. 20, 23). The nuclear envelope shows distinct nuclear pores in its pos- terior part (Figs. 19, 20). The acrosomal vacuole is somewhat more dense, and the nuclear canal with the acrosomal filament is complete, ap- pearing as a prominent ridge on the surface of the nucleus (Figs. 20, 21, 24). The mitochondria are still located at the posterior end of the cell. The cytoplasm is rather electron lucent, includ- ing only few dense granules. Remarkably, we did with deep infoldings of plasmalemma composing a basal labyrinth. The cells are attached to basal lamina with hemidesmosomes (arrow heads). X16,000. 8, nerve ending at muscle cell underlying epithelium of vas deferens. X30,000. M = mitochondrion, MU = muscle cell, N = nucleus. Figures 9, 10.— Spermatozoa of Hypochilus pococki: 9, mature coiled spermatozoon within lumen of distal vas deferens. Note multilayered secretory sheath. Arrows point to acrosomal filament. X32,000. 10, different secre- tions within vas deferens. X25,000. AV = acrosomal vacuole, AX = axonema, CA = centriolar adjunct within implantation fossa, GLY = glycogen, M = mitochondrion, N = nucleus. ALBERTI & COYLE-SPERM ULTRASTRUCTURE OF HYPOCHILUS 143 Figures 11, 12. —• Spermatozoa of Hypochilm pococki: 11, nearly mature spermatozoon from testis. Note acrosomal vacuole sectioned longitudinally, postcentriolar nuclear elongation, centriolar adjunct within implantation fossa, numerous mitochondria, membranes and cistemae, glycogen, and axonema. Arrows point to acrosomal filament. X30,000. 12, transverse section through acrosomal complex. Note concentric layers within acrosomal vacuole close to subacrosomal space containing acrosomal filament, which is composed of subfibers. Dense cistemae are opposed to acrosomal vacuole (arrow heads). X60,000. AV = acrosomal vacuole, AX- = axonema, CA = centriolar adjunct, GLY = glycogen, M = mitochondrion, ME = membranes, N = nucleus, NE = nuclear elongation. not observe any membranous material within the cytoplasmic matrix in this or earlier stages (Figs. 2, 20). Finally the chromatin condenses completely to an almost totally dark structure leaving ex- tensive areas of electron lucent nucleoplasm sur- rounded by the nuclear envelope (Fig. 23). Also in this stage there are no (other) membranes pres- ent vrithin the cytoplasmic matrix; these only appear after the coiling process, which presum- ably occurs rapidly since no intermediate stages were found. In these nearly mature sperm cells distinct dense cistemae were found, some of which parallel the nucleus and acrosomal vac- uole (Figs. 24, also 11, 13). The cytoplasm is rather homogeneous but some (glycogen?) gran- ules are already concentrated at the axonemal base (Figs. 11, 13). Further, in the center of the cell is established a “dense body”, which later becomes unrecognizable because of the general condensation of the cytoplasm (Figs. 24, also 1 3). The flagellum is completely incorporated, i.e., the axonema is without a flagellar membrane (Figs. 24, also 11, 13, 17). The cell further con- denses and finally achieves the stage of the ma- ture spermatozoon. The cysts open and the sperm cells, together with the intercellular fluid, are ex- pelled into the lumen of the testis, which is es- tablished by such confluent cysts and is contin- uous with the lumen of the vas deferens. 144 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 13-17.— Spermatozoa of Hypochilus pococki: 13, two nearly mature spermatozoa from testis. Note dense nuclei with nuclear elongation and nuclear canal containing acrosomal filament (arrows). Membranes and cistemae in part are parallel with nucleus. X20,000. 14, longitudinal section through axonemal base showing modified distal centriole with central axis and proximal part of axonema surrounded by glycogen. X20,000. 15- 17, transverse sections: 15, proximal centriole within implantation fossa closely attached to centriolar adjunct. X37,500. 16, axonemal base with central axis. Note accessory dense elements opposed to peripheral tubules. ALBERTI & COYLE -SPERM ULTRASTRUCTURE OF HYPOCHILUS 145 DISCUSSION The sperm cells of H. pococki are quite similar to those of many other araneomorph spiders (Al- berti 1990). Based upon observations of sper- matozoa in other spiders (including Filistata in- sidiatrix Forskal) and pedipalpate arachnids (Uropygi and Amblypygi), we believe that two of these similarities (the stout nucleus and the very pronounced nuclear elongation) may be re- garded as araneomorph synapomorphies and are therefore supportive of Platnick and Gertsch’s (1976) phytogeny. Many other Hypochiius char- acter states appear to be plesiomorphic, e.g., the presence of several mitochondria, membranous material and a “dense body”, the high number of glycogen granules, the rather simple implan- tation fossa, the cone-shaped acrosomal vacuole, and the acrosomal filament extending through the whole length of the nuclear canal. These states are also found in F. insidiatrix and many (other) araneomorph spiders as well as in mygalo- morphs, liphistiomorphs, and pedipalpate arachnids (Alberti & Weinmann 1985; Alberti et al. 1986; Alberti 1990; Osaki 1969; Phillips 1976; Jespersen 1978; Tripepi & Saita 1985; Al- berti & Palacios- Vargas 1987). Thus our findings are consistent with the interpretation that Hy- pochilidae are ancient araneomorph spiders. The discovery of cleistospermia in the hypo- chilids leads us back to the question, first dis- cussed by Bertkau (1877, 1878), of whether cleis- tospermia or coenospermia are plesiomorphic for spiders. Since only individual (not aggregated) sperm cells have been found in uropygids and amblypygids (the presumed sister group of spi- ders), outgroup comparison supports the hy- pothesis that cleistospermia are plesiomorphic. If this is true, then coenospermia could be a syn- apomorphy uniting the liphistiids, mygalo- morphs, and filistatids (the only araneomorph taxon in which coenospermia have been found electron microscopically), a pattern consistent with some of Lehtinen’s (1978) ideas and Eskov and Zonshtein’s (1990) phytogeny. If, on the other hand, coenospermia are prim- itive for spiders, as Alberti & Weinmann (1985), Alberti et al. (1986), and Alberti (1990) have argued, cleistospermia could be a synapomorphy for araneomorphs (with reversals in the filistatids and Cheiracanthium sp.) or, more likely, cleis- tospermia could have arisen two or more times independently in the Araneomorphae. We favor the hypothesis that coenospermia are plesiom- orphic for spiders for the following reasons: 1) Coenospermia have been found predominately in spiders which are “primitive.” 2) Although not found in amblypygids and uropygids, aggre- gations of spermatozoa comparable to coenos- permia are found in other arachnids (scorpions, solpugids, opilionids, and certain mites) (Alberti 1990). 3) Given our current knowledge of the distribution of coenospermia and cleistospermia, and if, as our above-mentioned synapomorphies suggest, the phytogeny of Platnick and Gertsch (1976) is correct, it is more parsimonious to hy- pothesize that coenospermia is the primitive state (character state changes are required only within the Araneomorphae) than that it is derived (changes are required in the Mesothelae, Myga- lomorphae, and Araneomorphae). Other issues relevant to the evolution of modes of sperm packaging deserve comment. First, the observation that many cleistospermia are rather similar to coenospermia, particularly with re- spect to the (often multilayered) secretory sheath and cellular components, and especially when compared with the coenospermia of F. insidiatrix, suggests that the evolutionary shift from coe- nospermia to cleistospermia may be achieved easily. The presence of coenospermia in one spe- cies of Cheiracanthium (Tuzet & Manier 1959) and of cleistospermia in another (Alberti 1 990) also supports this hypothesis. Secondly, although it is tempting to hypothesize that the syncytial synspermia of some haplogynes and the multi- cellular “spermatophores” of the telemids have evolved from the multicellular coenospermia, both types could also represent aggregates which have originated independently from cleistosper- mia (see Alberti 1990). Finally, in spite of the greater amount of secretory sheath material needed to package a given number of sperm as cleistospermia rather than as coenospermia. X24,000. 17, coiled axonema incorporated within cell body showing 9x2+3 pattern of tubules. In proximal part of axonema, A-tubules are densely staining and central tubules are interconnected by dense material. X40,000. AV = acrosomal vacuole, AX = axonema, CA = centriolar adjunct, DB = dense body, M = mitochondrion, ME = membranes, N = nucleus, NE = nuclear elongation. Figures 18-21. —Details of spermiogenesis in Hypochilus pococki: 18, early stage with acrosomal vacuole inclined to longitudinal axis of nucleus. Acrosomal filament (arrow) runs obliquely into nuclear canal. X12,600. 19, advanced stage with implantation fossa. Note nuclear pores at posterior part of nucleus (arrow heads). Fibrillar chromatin condensation starts in posterior part of nucleus. X12,600. 20, more advanced stage. Chromatin is completely fibrillar. A prominent postcentriolar nuclear elongation has developed. Note flagellar base with flagellar tunnel sectioned only in its proximal part (arrow). Small arrow heads indicate nuclear pores. Nucleus is provided with manchette microtubules attached to a dense girdle around the acrosomal vacuole (large arrow Figures 22-24.— Spermatids of Hypochilus pococki: 22, tangentially sectioned acrosomal complex showing acrosomal vacuole and acrosomal filament, composed of subfibers. Dense girdle with attached manchette mi- crotubules. X48,000. 23, transverse section through flagellar tunnel around proximal part of flagellum (arrow heads) of a spermatid. Note manchette microtubules. Arrow indicates nuclear envelope. X48,000. 24, spermatids shortly after coiling and not completely condensed (note only 2 and 3 transverse sections of the axonema within the cell in center of figure). Within cytoplasm dense cistemae are apparent now (arrow heads). Arrows point to acrosomal filament. X12,600. AV = acrosomal vacuole, DB = dense body, M = mitochondrion, N = nucleus, NE = nuclear elongation, SC = somatic cell. heads). X16,000. 21, same stage as in Fig. 20 showing implantation fossa with centrioles in tandem position. At right a cytoplasmic “bleb” containing irregular membranous network is detached from cell bridge region. X16,000. AF = acrosomal filament, AV = acrosomal vacuole, CB = cell bridge, IF = implantation fossa, N = nucleus. 148 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY transferring sperm as cleistospermia may be gen- erally more effective, particularly in araneo- morph genitalia, which often have narrower and more sharply bent ducts than do nonaraneo- morph genitalia. Cleistospermia are smaller than coenospermia and therefore should be able to move through such ducts with less resistence and less chance of becoming stuck. A study of the degree of correlation between sperm packet di- ameter and genital duct diameter in spiders might help test for such a functional relationship, one which could play an important role in the evo- lution of sperm packaging. Spider sperm ultrastructure is evidently a rich source of characters. As more taxa are examined and as more is learned about the functional mor- phology of spider genitalia (and therefore, per- haps, the selective advantage of different types of sperm), it may be possible to learn much about spider phylogeny from comparative spermatol- ogy. LITERATURE CITED Afzelius, B. A. 1979. Sperm structure in relation to phylogeny in lower metazoa. Pp. 243-251, In The Spermatozoan. (D. W. Fawcett & J. M. Bedford, eds.). Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore-Mu- nich. Alberti, G. 1990. Comparative spermatology of Ara- neae. Acta Zool. Fenn., 190:17-34. Alberti, G., B. A. Afzelius & S. M. Lucas. 1986. Ul- trastructure of spermatozoa and spermatogenesis in bird spiders (Theraphosidae, Mygalomorphae, Ara- neae). J. Submicrosc. Cytol., 18:739-753. Alberti, G. & J. G. Palacios-Vargas. 1987. Fine struc- ture of spermatozoa and spermatogenesis of Schi- zomus palaciosi, Reddell and Cokendolpher, 1986. (Arachnida: Uropygi: Schizomida). Protoplasma, 137:1-14. Alberti, G. & C. Weinmann. 1985. Fine structure of spermatozoa of some labidognath spiders (Filista- tidae, Segestriidae, Dysderidae, Oonopidae, Scyto- didae, Pholcidae; Araneae; Arachnida) with re- marks on spermiogenesis. J. MorphoL, 185:1-35. Baccetti, B. 1970. The spermatozoa of Arthropoda. IX. The sperm cell as an index of arthropod phy- logeny. Pp. 169-181, In Comparative Spermatol- ogy. (B. Baccetti, ed.). Academic Press, Orlando. Baccetti, B. 1979. Ultrastructure of sperm and its bearing on arthropod phylogeny. Pp. 609-644, In Arthropod Phylogeny. (A. P. Gupta, ed.) Van Nos- trand Reinhold, New York. Baccetti, B. 1985. Evolution of the sperm cell. Pp. 3-58, In Biology of Fertilization. Vol. 2. Biology of the Sperm. (C. B. Metz & A. Monroy, eds.). Aca- demic Press, Orlando. Baccetti, B. & B. A. Afzelius. 1976. The Biology of the Sperm Cell. Monographs in Developmental Bi- ology. Vol. 10. Karger, Miinchen. Bertkau, P. 1877. Uber die Ubertragungsorgane und die Spermatozoan der Spinnen. Verb. Naturh. Ver. preuss. Rheinl., 34:28-32. Bertkau, P. 1878. Versuch einer natiirlichen Anord- nung der Spinnen nebst Bemerkungen zu einzelnen Gattungen. Arch. f. Naturgesch., 44:351-410. Boissin, L. 1973. Etude ultrastructurale de la sper- miogenese de Meta bourneti Simon (Arachnides, Araneides, Metinae). C.R. 2e Reun. Arachnol. Exp. franc., Montpellier, 1973:7-22. Brignoli, P. M. 1978. A few notes on a remarkable South African troglobiotic spider, Congoderes lewisi Harington, 1951 (Araneae, Telemidae). Rev. Suisse Zool, 85:111-114. Coddington, J. A. 1990. Ontogeny and homology in the male palpus of orb-weaving spiders and their relatives, with comments on phylogeny (Araneocla- da: Araneoida, Deinopoidea). Smithson. Contrib. Zool., (496): 1-52. Eskov, K. Y. & S. L. Zonshtein. 1990. A new clas- sification for the order Araneida (Arachnida: Chelic- erata). Acta Zool. Fenn., 190:129-137. Forster, R. R., N. 1. Platnick & M. R. Gray. 1987. A review of the spider superfamilies Hypochiloidea and Austrochiloidea (Araneae, Araneoraorphae). Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 185:1-116. Franzen, A. 1956. On spermiogenesis, morphology of the spermatozoon, and biology of fertilization among invertebrates. Zool. Bidrag., Uppsala, 31; 255-^82. Franzen, A. 1977. Sperm structure with regard to fertilization biology and phylogenetics. Verb. Dtsch. Zool. Ges., 1977:123-138. Jespersen, A. 1978. The fine structure of spermio- genesis in the Amblypygi and Uropygi (Arachnida). Zoomorphol., 89:237-250. Juberthie, C., A. Lopez Sc J. Kovoor. 1981. Sper- miogenesis and spermatophore in Telema tenella Simon (Araneae: Telemidae) - An ultrastructural study. Int. J. Invert. Reprod., 3:181-191. Lehtinen, P. T. 1967. Classification of the cribellate spiders and some allied families, with notes on the evolution of the suborder Araneomorpha. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 4:199-468. Lehtinen, P. T. 1978. Definition and limitation of supraspecific taxa in spiders. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lon- don, 42:255-271. Lehtinen, P. T. 1 986. Evolution of the Scytodoidea. Pp. 149-157, In Proc. 9th Intern. Congr. Arachnol. (W. G. Eberhard, Y. D. Lubin & B. C. Robinson, eds.). Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, D. C. Lopez, A. & L. Boissin. 1976. La spermatide d'Hol- ocnemus pluchei (Scop.) (Arachnida, Araneida, Pholcidae): Etude ultrastructurale. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 101:423-431. Lopez, A., J.-C. Bonaric, & L. Boissin. 1983. Etude ALBERTI & COYLE-SPERM ULTRASTRUCTURE OF HYPOCHILUS 149 ultrastructurale de la spermiogenese chez I’araignee Pisaura mirabilis (Clerck, 1858) (Pisauridae). Rev. ArachnoL, 5:55-64. Osaki, H. 1969. Electron microscope study on the spermatozoon of the liphistiid spider, Heptathela kimurai. Acta ArachnoL, 22:1-12. Osaki, H. 1972. Electron microscope study on sper- miogenesis in the spider, Oxyopes sertatus. Japan. J. ZooL, 16:184-199. Phillips, D. M. 1976. Nuclear shaping during sper- miogenesis in the whip scorpion. J. Ultrastr. Res., 54:397.^05. Platnick, N. I. 1977. The hypochiloid spiders: a cla- distic analysis, with notes on the Atypoidea (Arach- nida, Araneae). Amer. Mus. Novitates, (2627): 1- 23. Platnick, N. 1. & W. J. Gertsch. 1976. The suborders of spiders: a cladistic analysis. Amer. Mus. Novi- tates, (2607): 1-1 5. Raven, R. J. 1985. The spider infraorder Mygalo- morphae: cladistics and systematics. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 182:1-180. Reger, J. F. 1970. Spermiogenesis in the spider Pi- saurina sp.: a fine structure study. J. Morphol., 1 30: 421-434. Rosati, F., B. Baccetti & R. Dallai. 1970. The sper- matozoa of Arthropoda. X. Araneids and the lower myriapods. Pp. 247-254, In Comparative Sper- matology. (B. Baccetti, ed.) Academic Press, New York. Tripepi, S. & A. Saita. 1985. Ultrastructural analysis of spermiogenesis in Admetus pomilio (Arachnida, Amblypygi). J. Morphol., 184:111-120. Tuzet, O. & J. F. Manier. 1959. Recherches sur la spermiogenese des araignees: Araneus cornutus, Te- tragnatha pinicola, Philodromus poecilus, et Chir- acanthium sp. Ann. Sc. Nat. ZooL, 12e ser.:9 1-103. Manuscript received December 1990, revised March 1991. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:150-152 RESEARCH NOTES A TRAP TO CAPTURE BURROWING ARACHNIDS In studies of population biology, it is often necessary to determine size and reproductive sta- tus of individuals and to mark them for later recognition. This process should assure minimal disturbance of study subjects and of their natural surroundings. Current techniques for capturing burrowing arachnids, however, often involve disturbance, such as excavation. This destroys burrows and risks injuring animals. Several alternative techniques for capturing burrow; C, door of trap; D, door-lever; E, balancing shaft; F, trigger-lever; G, trigger; H, locking hook; I, spider; J, open vial to provide spider with shelter; K, slit to lock shaft; L, vial with live bait. 150 RESEARCH NOTES 151 large, burrowing, wandering spiders were tested in a population study of Leucorchestris arenicola Lawrence, a heteropodid (Henschel 1990). When disturbance caused by excavation proved unacceptable, pitfall traps were employed. Trap- ping success was, however, low because spiders usually detected and circumvented the edges of pits. Furthermore, individual spiders could not be targeted. Therefore, I designed a container trap, de- scribed here, which is cheap to make and easy to operate. It capitalizes on a spider’s tendency to probe when surrounded by a container. This probing mechanically triggers closure of an ar- tificial trapdoor that prevents the spider from retreating into its burrow, thus capturing it inside the container. The sensitive trigger mechanism enables one to capture burrowing arachnids having a mass of 0.5 g or more. I have used it to capture more than 1 00 spiders of two species and one scorpion on surface slopes of 0-30° and in winds of 0-5 m/s. The body of the trap (Fig. 1) is made of a rectangular, flat-bottomed container (base ± 1 2 X 20 cm, height ±5 cm) with a transparent, air- tight lid. A commercially available 2-liter plastic container for food, such as an empty ice-cream tub, is suitable. All other components besides sample vials are made of 1 .5-mm-gauge stiff wire and tape. The description of components refers to labels on Figure 1 . A hole of 4 x 4 cm (A) is cut into the bottom near one end of the container. This hole is larger than the natural trapdoor of a spider burrow entrance (B) and is covered with a stiff wire-rimmed 5x5 cm door (C), hinging on a straight piece of wire attached to the body of the trap. The door is held open by leaning a door- lever (D), fixed to one side of the door, against a balancing shaft (E) suspended across to the other end of the trap. The heavier proximal end of this balancing shaft rests on a trigger-lever (F) connected to a wide, low-hanging trigger (G). The trigger-lever and door-lever are circular so that trigger sensitivity is less dependent on the extent of overlap of contact points. If the trigger is pushed only lightly (<0.1 g force = 9.806 x 10 ■’ Newtons), the heavier end of the balancing shaft drops off the trigger-lever, moving the distal end clear of the door-lever and the door closes by gravity. Simultaneously, a broad hook (H) drops onto the door to lock it (Fig. 2). Figure 2.— Closed door of trap locked into place by a wire hook. The trigger is positioned away from the door so that the spider (I) does not obstruct the slam- ming door. Although a spider is capable of lifting the door to enter its burrow, it cannot at the same time lift the locking hook and the door. Deprived of other shelter, it readily enters a darkened vial (J) extending through the side of the trap. This tube is later removed to manipulate the spider. The trap has to be opened to set it. As the trigger is very sensitive to wind until the lid is closed, the balancing shaft can be locked into position by forcing it into the narrowest top part of a slit (K) in the wall of the trap. When the trap is set and the lid closed, the balancing shaft is loosened by lowering it into a wider section of this slit until the balancing shaft is held only by the trigger-lever. Several factors increase trapping success. Movements of live bait placed in a vial (L) out- side the trap attracts the spider towards the trig- ger. To overcome the spider’s initial reluctance to step onto the artificial surroundings, the floor of the trap is covered with sand. On slopes, the trigger should be downhill of the door. In windy conditions, shifting of the trap is prevented by pegging it through its base behind the trigger. Weight of the trigger and shapes of door- and trigger-levers determine the minimum size of arachnids that can be captured. I thank the Foundation for Research Devel- opment for funds, the Ministry of Wildlife Con- 152 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY servation and Tourism of Namibia for facilities, T. Harms for help and M. Seely for comments. REFERENCES CITED Henschel, J. R. 1990. The biology of Leucorches- tris arenicola (Araneae: Heteropodidae), a burrow- ing spider of the Namib Desert. In Current Research on Namib Ecology— 25 Years of the Desert Eco- logical Research Unit. (M. K. Seely, ed.). Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 7. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, pp. 115-127. Johannes R. Henschel: Desert Ecological Research Unit of Namibia, P.O. Box 1592, Swakopmund, Namibia Manuscript received May 1990, revised August 1990. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:153-154 NOVEL USE OF SILK BY THE HARLEQUIN BEETLE-RIDING PSEUDOSCORPION, CORDYLOCHERNES SCORPIOIDES (PSEUDOSCORPIONIDA, CHERNETIDAE) Pseudoscorpion use of silk in the construction of nests for molting, brood production and hi- bernation is well documented (Weygoldt 1969). Silk for nest building is produced by glands in the cephalothorax and is extruded through the cheliceral galea (Chamberlin 1931). Males of Serianus cawlinensis Muchmore also manufac- ture a second type of silk in their rectal pocket for use in the spinning of spermatophore signal threads (Weygoldt 1966). Here, we describe two additional functions of silk in the harlequin beetle- riding pseudoscorpion, Cordylochernes scor- pioides (L.). Our research on the relationship between C. scorpioides and Acrocinus longimanus (L.) has established that the pseudoscorpion climbs un- der the elytra of the large cerambycid to disperse from old to newly-decaying trees (Zeh and Zeh in prep.). Large males exploit this dispersal mechanism by monopolizing beetle “subelytral space” as a strategic site for intercepting and in- seminating dispersing females. Whereas females tend to disembark rapidly when beetles land on fresh habitats, males may remain on beetles for periods of at least two weeks. An obvious tactical problem confronts these Figures 1-4.— Beetle-riding tactics of the pseudoscorpion, Cordylochernes scorpioides: 1, two males each use a chela to grasp an intertergal ridge of the harlequin beetle’s abdomen; 2, silken saftey harness connects male’s pedipalpal chela with the beetle’s abdomen; 3, male on a silken, nest-like structure; 4, female uses silken thead to descend from the beetle (lower right) while two males fight for control of the subelytral space (left). 153 154 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY beetle-riding pseudoscorpions: they must remain attached to the harlequin as it flies between trees. Risk of detachment is exacerbated by the fact that harlequin beetles fly with their bodies ori- ented vertically (pers. obs.). The pseudoscor- pions can avoid falling off by using their pedi- palpal chelae to grasp intertergal ridges on the beetle’s abdomen (Fig. 1). However, this method is clearly inadequate for those males which re- main on beetles for protracted periods in order to defend mobile mating territories. Not only do they experience numerous take-offs and flights, but they must also have their pedipalpal chelae free for mating. Males of C. scorpioides and all other chemetids maintain their grasp on females throughout mating (see Weygoldt 1969; Zeh 1987). Sudden flight of the beetle in response to predation risk, for example, could put a mating pseudoscorpion in danger of falling off. Silk provides the solution to this dilemma. To strap themselves securely to the beetle’s abdo- men, males use their cheliceral galea to construct silken “safety harnesses.” Initially, single threads secure the pseudoscorpion’s chelae to the beetle’s abdomen (Fig. 2). These are eventually elabo- rated into a complex nest-like structure (Fig. 3). Females have never been observed to make such structures, although they do attach with single threads. In its interaction with the harlequin beetle, C. scorpioides not only uses silk to stay on the beetle but also as an aid to disembarkation. Pseudo- scorpions can descend from their beetle host on a silken thread (Fig. 4). By maintaining contact with the beetle, this technique may provide dis- persing individuals with the means to reconnoi- ter new habitats and potentially use the thread as a guide to re-board. We have not observed dangling individuals climbing back up silken threads (see Weygoldt 1969, fig. 20 for an ex- ample of a pseudoscorpion climbing up a hair). However, the thread can support the weight of a pseudoscorpion (pers. obs.). A reconnoitering pseudoscorpion could therefore remain attached via the thread to a beetle which suddenly took flight. We thank W. B. Muchmore and V. Mahnert for identifying the pseudoscorpions, V. F. Lee and P. Weygoldt for useful comments on the manuscript, and the Panamanian Institute Na- cional de Recursos Naturales Renovables (IN- RENARE) for permission to carry out the work. Both authors gratefully acknowledge fellowship support from the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute. LITERATURE CITED Chamberlin, J. C. 1931. The arachnid order Chelo- nethida. Stanford Univ. Publ. Biol. Sci., 7:1-284. Weygoldt, P. 1966. Spermatophore web formation in a pseudoscorpion. Science, 153:1647-1649. Weygoldt, P. 1969. The Biology of Pseudoscorpions. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge. Zeh, D. W. 1987. Aggression, density, and sexual dimorphism in chemetid pseudoscorpions (Arach- nida: Pseudoscorpionida). Evolution, 41:1072-1087. David W. Zeh and Jeanne A. Zeh: Smithson- ian Tropical Research Institute, APO Miami 34002-00 1 1 USA, or, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Republica de Panama. Manuscript received February 1991, revised April 1991. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:155-156 ON THE SYNONYMY OF THAUMASTOBELLA MOUREI MELLO-LEITAO AND ILDIBAHA ALBOMACULATA KEYSERLING (ARANEAE, ARANEIDAE) The little known araneid genus Thaumasto- bella was created by Mello-Leitao in 1945. It is monotypic, based on a single adult female from Parana province in Brazil. Because the abdomen of the type specimen is sclerotized, provided with dorsal spines and a sclerotized ring around the spinnerets, Mello-Leitao assigned the new genus to the subfamily Gasteracanthinae. Since then, little has been published on the genus. Brignoli (1983) listed it as a genus on which nothing had been published since the original description. Levi (1985) pointed out that the status of the genus is uncertain and that no representatives other than the type specimen are known. Levi later in- formed me (in litt. 1990) that the type specimen is regarded as lost. However, based on the de- scription and the three drawings provided by Mello-Leitao (1945), Levi believed the type to be an immature Micrathena. In connection with an ongoing revision of the genus Gasteracantha and a phylogenetic analysis of the subfamily Gasteracanthinae I have been looking for the type material of all gasteracan- thine genera. Since Thaumastobella was origi- nally placed in the gasteracanthines I also searched for that material. In a recently published catalog of type material deposited in “Museu de Historia Natural “Capao da Imbuia”, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil (Pinto-da-Rocha & De Fatima Caron 1 989) I suddenly found the type species Thaumasto- bella mourei listed under the family Salticidae. The material was made available to me and an examination revealed that Thaumastobella mourei is in fact conspecific with Micrathena sac- cata (C. L. Koch, 1836). Thaumastobella Mello- Leitao, 1945 is therefore a junior synonym of Micrathena Sundevall, 1833 and Thaumasto- bella mourei Mello-Leitao, 1945 a junior syn- onym of Micrathena saccata (C. L. Koch, 1 836). The holotype matches perfectly with the descrip- tion and illustrations of Micrathena saccata giv- en by Levi (1985:490). Micrathena saccata is already known from Brazil, but not further south than Matto Grosso and this is therefore the southernmost record of the species. The generic name Ildibaha was synonymized with Micrathena by Levi (1985) who also stated that the type material of Ildibaha {Ildibaha al- bomaculata Keyserling, 1892) is lost. Based on Keyserling’s description and figure (Keyserling 1892:31, Tab. II fig. 29 & 29a, b) Levi concluded that Ildibaha albomaculata is a junior synonym of Micrathena flaveola (C. L. Koch, 1839) or a related species of the triangularispinosa species group. I recently found the syntypes of Ildibaha albomaculata in the collection of the Naturhis- torisches Museum, Wien (NMW) and was able to examine them. The material consists of three juvenile syn- types (originally four according to the acquisition ledger in NMW) from Blumenau, Brazil (26°55'S: 49°07'W). Two of the specimens are slightly smaller (2.40 & 2.48 mm) and darker than the third (2.68 mm), and the habitus of the two smaller specimens is almost identical with the juvenile specimen illustrated by Levi (1985, fig. 506, 507, Micrathena acuta) with only four ab- dominal spines. The third specimen is lighter and provided with 6 dorsal abdominal spines (Figs. 1, 2). I agree with Levi (1985) that Ildibaha al- bomaculata is conspecific with a species in the triangularispinosa species group, but do not think it is possible to state which particular species until more juvenile material of all known species is available. I thank R. Pinto-da-Rocha (Museu de Historia Natural “Capao da Imbuia”, Curitiba, Parana) and J. Gruber (Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien) for making the material of Thaumastobella and Ildibaha, respectively, available to me. Thanks are also extended to H. W. Levi, J. Coddington, N. 1. Platnick, C. Griswold and one anonymous reviewer for comments and corrections to an ear- lier draft of this note. The study was supported by the Danish Natural Science Research Council (grant no. 1 1-7440). The Smithsonian Institution kindly provided space and facilities during the study. LITERATURE CITED Bonnet, P. 1959. Bibliographia Araneorum, 2 (part 5). Toulouse. Brignoli, P. M. 1983. A Catalogue of the Araneae Described Between 1940 and 1981. Manchester Univ. Press. Manchester. 155 156 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 1, 2.— Habitus of Ildibaha albomaculata Keyserling, juvenile syntype from Brazil: 1, dorsal view; 2, lateral view. Scale line = 1 mm. Keyserling, E. 1892. Die spinnen Amerikas. Epeiridae, part I. Niimberg, 4:1-208. Levi, H. W. 1985. The spiny orb-weaver genera Mi- crathena and Chaetacis (Araneae, Araneidae). Bull. Mus. Comp. ZooL, 150:429-618. Mello-Leitao, C. de. 1945. Tres novas especies de Gasteracanthinae e notas sobre a subfamilia. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 17:261-267. Pinto-da-Rocha, R. & S. De Fatima Caron. 1989. Ca- talogo do material-tipo da colegao de Arachnida Rudolf Bruno Lange do Museu de Historia Natural ’’Capao da Imbuia", Curitiba, Parana, Brasil. Rev. Brasil. Biol., 49:1021-1029. Nikolaj Scharff, Zoologisk Museum, Universi- tetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Den- mark. Manuscript received January 1991, revised February, 1991. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Manuscripts are preferred in English but may be accepted in Spanish, French or Portuguese subject to availability of appropriate reviewers. Authors whose primary language is not English, may consult the Associate Editor for assistance in obtaining help with English manuscript preparation. All man- uscripts should be prepared in general accordance with the current edition of the Council of Biological Editors (CBE) Style Manual unless instructed otherwise below. Authors are ad- vised to consult a recent issue of the Journal of Arachnology for additional points of style. Send three identical copies of the typed material together with copies of illustrations to: Gary L. Miller, Associate Editor The Journal of Arachnology Department of Biology The University of Mississippi University, Mississippi 38677 USA Telephone: (601) 232-7495 FAX: (601) 232-5144 Bitnet: BYMILLER@UMSVM Correspondence relating to manuscripts should also be di- rected to the Associate Editor. Manuscripts longer than 1 500 words should be prepared as Feature Articles, shorter papers as Research Notes. FEATURE ARTICLES Title page.— Place in the upper left comer the complete name, address, and telephone number of the author vrith whom proofs and correspondence should be exchanged. Include FAX num- bers and Bitnet addresses if available. Four lines below, type the title, centered, all in capital letters. Another four lines be- low, beginning with the left margin, type each author’s name on a new line followed by the address. Abstract.— The heading should be placed at the beginning of the first paragraph set off by a period. In articles written in English, a second abstract in an acceptable language may be included pertinent to the nationality of the author(s) or geo- graphic region(s) emphasized in the article. A second abstract in English must be included in articles not written in the latter language. Text.— Double-space text, tables, legends, etc. throughout. Three levels of heads are used. The first level (METHODS, RESULTS, etc.) is typed in capitals and on a separate line. The second level head begins a paragraph with an indent and is separated from the text by a period and a dash. The third level may or may not begin a paragraph but is underscored and separated from the text by a colon. Use only the underline method to indicate italics; DO NOT USE WORD PROCES- SOR ITALICS CODES. Use the metric system unless quoting text or referencing collection data. All decimal fractions are indicated by the period regardless of language of the text. Citation of references in the text.— Include within parenthe- ses the surnames of the author(s) followed by the date of pub- lication. A comma separates multiple eitations by the same author(s) and a semicolon separates citations by different au- thors, e.g., (Smith 1970), (Jones 1988; Smith 1989), (Smith 1986, 1987; Smith & Jones 1989; Jones et al. 1989). Literature cited section.— Use the following style: Lombardi, S. J. & D. L. Kaplan. 1990. The amino acid composition of major ampullate gland silk (dragline) of Ne- phila clavipes (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J. Arachnol., 18: 297-306. Krafft, B. 1982. The significance and complexity of com- munication in spiders. Pp. 1 5-66, In Spider Communica- tions: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance. (P. N. Witt & J. S. Rovner, eds.). PrincetonUniversity Press, Princeton. Footnotes.— Footnotes are only permitted on the first printed page to indicate current address or other information con- cerning the author(s). All footnotes are placed together on a separate manuscript page. Running head.— Author sumame(s) and an abbreviated title must be typed all in caps and must not exceed 60 characters and spaces. The running head is placed by itself on a separate manuscript page. Taxonomic articles.— Consult a recent taxonomic article in the Journal of Arachnology for style or contact the Associate Editor. Tables.— Each table, with the legend above, should be placed on a separate manuscript page. Only the appropriate horizontal lines should be included. Use no footnotes; instead, include all information in the legend. Make notations in the text mar- gins to indicate the preferred location of tables in the printed text. Illustrations.— Original art work should be kept by the au- thor(s) until final acceptance for publication. All art work must be mounted on stiff board ready for reproduction. In line draw- ings, pay particular attention to width of lines and size of lettering when reductions are to be made by the printer. Mul- tiple photos assembled on a single plate should be mounted with only a minimum of space separating them. In the case of multiple illustrations mounted together, each illustration must be numbered sequentially rather than given an alphabetic se- quence. Written on the back should be the name(s) of author(s), an indication of top edge, and whether the art work should be returned. The overall dimensions should be no more than 1 1 inches (28 cm) x 14 inches (36 cm). Larger drawings present greater difficulty in shipping and greater risks of damage for which the JOA assumes no responsibility. The author is en- couraged to consider PMT (PhotoMechanical Transfer) repro- ductions for large drawings and to consult an Editor for details on appropriate reductions. Make notations in the text margins to indicate the preferred position of illustrations in the printed text. Legends for illustrations should be placed together on the same page(s) and separate from the illustrations. Adhere to the following styles: Figures \-^.—A-us x-us, male from Timbuktu: 1, left leg; 2, right chelicera; 3, dorsal aspect of genitalia; 4, ventral aspect of abdomen. Figures 27-34.— Right chelicerae of species of A-us from Timbuktu: 27, 29, 3 1, 33, dorsal views; 28, 30, 32, 34, prolater- al views of moveable finger; 27, 28, A-us x-us, holotype male; 29, 30, A-us. w-us, holotype male; 31, 32, A-us z-us, holotype male; 33, 34, A-us y-us, male. Scales = 1.0 mm. Assemble manuscript for mailing.— Assemble the separate sections or pages in the following sequence; title page, abstract, text, figure legends, footnotes, running head, tables with leg- ends, figures. Page charges and reprints.- The current charge per journal page will be assessed as follows: $50— nonmembers, $45 — members with grant, institutional, or other support for page costs; $25 — regular members who do not have support for page costs; $20— student members who do not author with full members and who do not have support. Limited grants may be available to help defray publication costs. Consult the As- sociate Editor for details. Reprints are available only from the printer at current costs. RESEARCH NOTES Instructions above pertaining to feature articles apply also to research notes except that abstracts and most headings are not used and the byline follows the Literature Cited section. CONTENTS THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY VOLUME 19 Feature Articles NUMBER 2 Spatial distribution of Lycosa tarentula fasciiventris (Araneae, Lycosidae) in a population from central Spain, Carmen Ferndndez-Montraveta, Ra- fael Lohoz-Beltra and Joaquin Ortega 73 Owner-biased agonistic behavior in female Lycosa tarentula fasciiventris (Araneae, Lycosidae), Carmen Ferndndez-Montraveta and Joaquin Or- tega 80 A mitochondrial DNA restriction enzyme cleavage map for the scorpion Hadrurus arizonensis (luridae), Deborah Roan Smith and Wesley M. Brown , 85 Eremochelis lagunensis, especie nueva (Arachnida, Solpugida, Eremobati- dae) de Baja California Sur, Mexico, Ignacio M. Vdzquez 88 Nuevos aportes al genero Porrimosa Roewer (Araneae, Lycosidae), Roberto M. Capocasale 93 Mother-offspring food transfer in Coelotes terrestris (Araneae, Agelenidae), Jean-Luc Gundermann, Andre Horel and Chantal Roland 97 On the spider genus Fedotovia (Araneae, Gnaphosidae), Vladimir I. Ovtsha- renko and Norman I. Platnick 102 The life history of Euscorpius flavicaudis {^tCorpiorvQS, Chactidae), T. G. Benton 105 Homing by crab spiders Misumena vatia (Araneae, Thomisidae) separated from their nests, Douglass H. Morse Ill On Eurasian and American Talanites (Araneae, Gnaphosidae), Norman I. Platnick and Vladimir I. Ovtsharenko 115 Diplocentrus perezi, a new species of scorpion from southeastern Mexico (Diplocentridae), W. David Sissom 122 When is the sex ratio biased in social spiders?: Chromosome studies of embryos and male meiosis in Anelosimus species (Araneae, Theridi- idae), Leticia Aviles and Wayne Maddison 126 Ultrastructure of the primary male genital system, spermatozoa, and sper- miogenesis of Hypochilus pococki (Araneae, Hypochilidae), Gerd Al- berti and Frederick A. Coyle 136 Research Notes A trap to capture burrowing arachnids, Johannes R. Henschel 150 Novel use of silk by the harlequin beetle-riding pseudoscorpion, Cordylo- chernes scorpioides (Pseudoscorpionida, Chemetidae), David W. Zeh and Jeanne A. Zeh 153 On the synonymy of Thaumastobella mourei Mello-Leitao and Ildibaha albomaculata Keyserling (Araneae, Araneidae), Nikolaj Scharff 155 °+ The Journal of ARACHNOLOGY OFFICIAL ORGAN OF THE AMERICAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 19 1991 NUMBER 3 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY EDITOR: James W. Berry, Butler University ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Gary L. Miller, The University of Mississippi EDITORIAL BOARD: A. Cady, Miami (Ohio) Univ. at Middletown; J. E. Carrel, Univ. Missouri; J. A. Coddington, National Mus. Natural Hist.; J. C. Cokendolpher, Lubbock, Texas; F. A. Coyle, Western Carolina Univ.; C. D. Don- dale, Agriculture Canada; W. G. Eberhard, Univ. Costa Rica; M. E. Galiano, Mus. Argentine de Ciencias Naturales; M. H. Greenstone, BCIRL, Columbia, Missouri; N. V. Horner, Midwestern State Univ.; D. T. Jennings, Garland, Maine; V. F. Lee, California Acad. Sci.; H. W. Levi, Harvard Univ.; E. A. Maury, Mus. Argentine de Ciencias Naturales; N. 1. Platnick, American Mus. Natural Hist.; G. A. Polis, Vanderbilt Univ.; S. E. Riechert, Univ. Tennessee; A. L. Rypstra, Miami Univ., Ohio; M. H. Robinson, U.S. National Zool. Park; W. A. Shear, Hampden-Sydney Coll.; G. W. Uetz, Univ. Cincinnati; C. E. Valerio, Univ. Costa Rica. The Journal of Arachnology (ISSN 0160-8202), a publication devoted to the study of Arachnida, is published three times each year by The American Arach- nological Society. Memberships (yearly): Membership is open to all those inter- ested in Arachnida. Subscriptions to The Journal of Arachnology and American Arachnology (the newsletter), and annual meeting notices, are included with mem- bership in the Society. Regular, $30; Students, $20; Institutional, $80 (USA) or $90 (all other countries). Inquiries should be directed to the Membership Secretary (see below). Back Issues: Susan E. Riechert, Department of Zoology, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37916 USA. Undelivered Issues: Allen Press, Inc., 1041 New Hampshire Street, P.O. Box 368, Lawrence, Kansas 66044 USA. THE AMERICAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY PRESIDENT: Allen R. Brady (1991-1993), Biology Department, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49423 USA. PRESIDENT-ELECT: James E. Carico (1991-1993), Department of Biology, Lynchburg College, Lynchburg, Virginia 24501 USA. MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY: Norman I. Platnick (appointed), American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, New York 10024 USA. TREASURER: Gail E. Stratton (1991-1993), Department of Biology, Albion College, Albion, Michigan 49224 USA. SECRETARY: Brent Opell (1991-1993), Department of Biology, Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 USA. ARCHIVIST: Vincent D. Roth, Box 136, Portal, Arizona 85632 USA. DIRECTORS: Matthew H. Greenstone (1990-1992), George W. Uetz (1991- 1993), Charles E. Griswold (1991-1993). HONORARY MEMBERS: C. D. Dondale, W. J. Gertsch, H. Homann, H. W. Levi, A. F. Millidge, M. Vachon, T. Yaginuma. Cover illustration: Female Phidippus mystaceus, (Araneae, Salticidae), Eastern USA, by G. B. Edwards. THIS PUBLICATION IS PRINTED ON ACID-FREE PAPER. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:157-160 SEGREGATION STUDIES OF ISOZYME VARIATION IN METAPHIDIPPUS GALATHEA (ARANEAE, SALTICIDAE)' William W. M. Steiner and Matthew H. Greenstone: Biological Control of Insects Research Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, P.O. Box 7629, Research Park, Columbia, Missouri 65205 USA ABSTRACT. Three field-collected isofemale lines of Metaphidippus galathea were established as laboratory colonies. The female parents and their progeny were electrophoretically examined for 1 3 proteins coding for 2 1 isozymes. Eight proteins were segregating for allozymes and four were analyzed for Mendelian inheritance. Although sample sizes were small, the GOT-1 locus showed a tendency toward deviation from the expected inheritance pattern. Nonconformance to genetic expectations may be due to multiple-mating, to selection effects from laboratory rearing conditions, or to genetic drift. Several studies now claim to show varying lev- els of genetic variation in spiders based on allo- zyme surveys (Steiner et al. in prep.; Roeloffs & Riechert 1988; Terranova & Roach 1987a; Smith 1 986; Lubin & Crozier 1985; Cesaroni et al. 1981; Manchenko 1981). Genetic variation is impor- tant for the study of phenomena such as popu- lation differentiation and interpopulation migra- tion (Roeloffs & Riechert 1988; Smith 1986; Lubin & Crozier 1985) and in defining taxonom- ic differences (Terranova & Roach 1987b; Pen- nington 1979). For the studies to be valid rep- resentatives of genetic variability, it is important that genetic inheritance of the allozymes be ver- ified, as it is possible for enzyme variation to be environmentally induced (Gerasimova & Smir- nova 1986; Amason & Chambers 1987) or to be found only during ontogeny (Korochkin & Mat- veeva 1974). In this paper, we report the first evidence based on parental-offspring correla- tions to support Mendelian inheritance of allo- zymes in spiders. METHODS Three female Metaphidippus galathea were collected in mid-June of 1984 at the University of Missouri’s Tucker Natural Prairie in central Missouri. The Prairie is a tallgrass remnant lo- cated 25 km east of Columbia, Missouri (Drew 1 947). The females were returned to the Biolog- ical Control of Insects Research Laboratory, 'Any mention of a proprietary product in this article does not indicate endorsement by the USDA-ARS. United States Department of Agriculture, Agri- cultural Research Service, where they were housed in self-watering cages (Jackson 1974), fed early- mid 5th instar Trichoplusia ni (Hubner) larvae for maintenance, and kept at approximate rela- tive humidities and temperatures of 70% and 25 °C, respectively. Approximately 1 7 days later all three were observed with egg cases. Sixteen days after that the egg cases hatched and the spider- lings were maintained on Drosophila melano- gaster Meigen. At 60 days of age, the spiderlings and their maternal parents were frozen for elec- trophoresis. Aging spiders for 60 days reduces the possibility of ontogenic effects on electro- phoretic pattern. Starch gel electrophoresis was performed and the resulting gels stained for enzyme activity as described in Steiner and Joslyn (1979). Individ- uals were run side-by-side on 1 cm thick gels which could be horizontally-sliced into 1 mm slices for protein histochemical staining. The protein systems analyzed are listed in Table 1. Two electrode chamber-gel buffer systems were used. The first was a pH 8.2 LiOH/Boric Acid electrode buffer with a pH 8.5 Trizma Base/citric acid gel used to analyze the proteins ACPH, AL- DOX, EST, PGM, and PGI. The second con- tained citric acid and Trizma Base in both the electrode chamber (pH 8.2) and the gel (pH 8.4) and was used to analyze ADK, GOT, G-3-PDH, HK, IDH, a-GPDH, MDH and 6-PGDH. Ma- terial from the female and her offspring were run on the same gels to aid in recognizing isozyme banding homologies. The resulting segregation 157 158 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1.— Enzymatic loci and their electrophoretic characteristics for the spider, Metaphidippus galathea. Abbreviations: DH = dehydrogenase; E.C.N. = enzyme classification number assigned by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry; * = polymorphic protein system; S = protein quaternary structure, M = monomer and D = dimer; N = number of loci observed for the individual protein (the total is 2 1 ); relative distance is the anodal migration distance measured from the origin to the band on a 12% Sigma starch gel run at 70 mA/gel for 12 h on the designated system in METHODS. For GOT-2, the protein migrated toward the cathode 3 mm from the origin. Protein Enzyme Classification Number Abbrev. S N Relative distance in mm Acid phosphatase 3. 1.3.2 ACPH M 2 18 and 15 Adenylate kinase 2.7.4.3 ADK M 1 24 Aldehyde oxidase 1.2.3. 1 ALDOX M 1 22 Esterase 3.1. 1.1 EST* M 4 68, 60, 50 and 33 Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase 2.6.1. I GOT* D 2 16 and -3 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate DH 1.2.1.12 G-3-PDH — 1 16 alpha-Glycerophosphate DH 1.1. 1.8 a-GPDH* D 2 20 and 10 Hexokinase 2.7. 1.1 HK — 1 2 Isocitrate DH 1.1.1.42 IDH* D 2 1 2 and 8 Malate DH 1.1.1.37 MDH — 2 20 and 8 6-phosphogluconate DH 1.1.1.44 6-PGDH* D 1 17 Phosphoglucomutase 2.7.5. 1 PGM — 1 31 Phosphoglucose isomerase 5.3. 1.9 PGI — 1 5 data were analyzed using the test with Yates Correction Factor for small sample sizes. RESULTS A total of 2 1 loci encoding 1 3 proteins were identified. Eight loci were polymorphic, but four of these were esterases which we have not in- cluded in this analysis. This was because some individuals expressed overlap of alleles between the esterase loci making genotype assignments difficult. These esterase genes expressed the high- est variation found. The other four loci included GOT- 1 (migrating to 16 mm), IDH-1 (migrating to 12 mm), a- GPDH-1 (migrating to 20 mm) and 6-PGDH (migrating to 1 7 mm). Heterozygotes of all these loci were triple-banded while homozygotes were single-handed suggesting a dimeric enzyme structure consisting of two polypeptide chains (Table 1). In this study the maternal genotypes could be determined directly from the gels, leading us to infer the paternal genotype. This enabled us to generate an expected genotype ratio in the F,, assuming a single-pair mating took place. The assumptions of male genotype and F, genotype ratio were met at all loci although GOT-1 ap- proached a significant departure. At that locus, a deficiency of heterozygotes and an excess of the common allele homozygote occurred which was strengthened when similar mating types were pooled. Assuming an alternative ratio of 1:2:1 only led to a higher value (x^ = 15.73, P < 0.001) due to a lack of GOT-U'' and decreased expected numbers of GOT- PL DISCUSSION The segregation patterns we observed fit Men- delian expectations. This is expected, since Men- delian inheritance of allozyme genes is widely reported in the literature for Drosophila, hu- mans, plants and other organisms. Only the segregation at GOT-1 approaches a significant departure (x^ = 2.77,/’ = 0.105) which can be explained in several ways. First, the GOT- 1 results may be anomalous since we cannot completely exclude sampling error due to small samples (genetic drift). Only further study can verify or falsify this argument, although the strength of the x^ statistic which includes the correction for small sample sizes, and the rela- tively higher number of surviving Fj would not seem to support it. Or, it may be that selection is favoring GOT-1” under the laboratory con- ditions. However, it remains difficult to bring the observed ratio into a 1 : 1 balance by just invoking selection against or for a single genotype, and the question arises as to what the selective factor STEINER & GREENSTONE-SEGREGATION STUDIES OF ISOZYMES 159 Table 2.— Segregation statistics for four allozyme loci in the spider, Metaphidippus galatkea. Parental genotypic crosses are indicated by A, B, and C. Sex ratio refers to female to male with female genotype known and male genotype inferred. Expected F, genotypes are calculated from the expected genotypic ratio. In the genotype codings, 5 designates the most commonly occurring band, 1-4 indicates faster migrating bands, and 6-9 indicates slower migrating bands. We assume bands are indicative of the allelic state. For the chi-square tests, matings with similar parental genotypes were pooled when individual chi-square tests were insignificant. Lack of sig- nificant differences between observed and expected numbers of progeny is designated NS. Locus Parental genotypes F| sex ratio F, genotypes, obs/exp Expected F, genotypic 45 55 56 ratio GOT-1 A 55 X 45 5:4 2/4 7/5 1:1 NS B 55 X 45 1:4 1/2 3/2 1:1 NS C 45 X 55 3:4 2/2 2/2 1:1 NS 6-PGDH A 56 X 55 5:4 4/4 5/4 1:1 NS B 55 X 55 1:4 4/4 Fixed C 55 X 55 3:4 7/7 Fixed a-GPDH-1 A 55 X 56 5:4 5/5 4/5 1:1 NS B 55 X 56 3:4 2/3 5/4 1:1 NS C 55 X 55 1:4 4/4 Fixed IDH-1 A 55 X 55 5:4 9/9 Fixed B 56 X 55 1:4 1/2 3/2 1:1 NS C 55 X 55 3:4 7/7 Fixed might be, assuming laboratory conditions are more optimal to survival than natural condi- tions. Obviously the other allozyme loci do not reflect a selection pattern. It is also possible that sperm competition is involved. In fact, Jackson (1980) has found evidence for sperm competi- tion in Phidippus, suggesting evidence for both multiple mating and pre-zygotic selection. In our case, assuming that GOT - 1 somehow plays a role in any pre-zygotic selection further complicates the issue. An alternative explanation is that GOT-1 female A (Table 2) may have mated with two males rather than one. Fertilization by an ad- ditional GOT-1” genotypic male would make half the female’s progeny homozygous; removing that half from the nine offspring would then re- sult in a 1:1 ratio of offspring resulting from the mating with the GOT-U^ heterozygous male. Although the evidence for either multiple- mating and/or sperm competition is admittedly weak, the suggestion that electrophoresis can be used as a tool to study reproductive strategies in spiders is appropriate. This approach should be considered especially in view of Jackson’s (1980) research. Questions concerning the extent of multiple mating and the survival or fitness qual- ities of the paternal parent could then be as- sessed. In this way, population biology param- eters previously undefined could lead to a better understanding of spider ecology, behavior and evolution. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We would like to thank C. Morgan for his aid in raising and caring for the spiders, and the De- partment of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia for permission to work at Tucker Prairie. We would also like to thank F. Breden; Y. Lubin; I. McDonald; S. Riechert and G. Uetz for comments and criticisms. LITERATURE CITED Amason, E. & G. K. Chambers. 1987. Macromolec- ular interaction and the electrophoretic mobility of Esterase- 5 from Drosophila pseudoboscura. Bio- chem. Genet, 25:287-307. Cesaroni, D., G. Allegrucci, M. Caccone, M. Sbordoni, E. De Matthaeis & 1. Sbordoni. 1981. Genetic variability and divergence between populations of species of Nesticus cave spiders. Genetica, 56:81- 92. Drew, W. B. 1947. Floristic composition of grazed and ungrazed prairie vegetation in North-Central Missouri. Ecology, 28:26^1. Gerasimova, T. 1. & S. G. Smirnova. 1979. Maternal effects for genes encoding 6-phosphogluconate de- hydrogenase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydroge- nase in Drosophila melanogaster. Develop. Genet., 1:97-107. Jackson, R. R. 1974. Rearing methods for spiders. J. Arachnol., 2:53-56. 160 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Jackson, R. R. 1980. The mating strategy of Phidip- pus johnsoni (Araneae, Salticidae): II. Sperm com- petition and the function of copulation. J. Arach- nol., 8:217-240. Korochkin, L. I. & N. M. Matveeva. 1974. Genetics of esterases in Drosophila of the Virilis group. II. Sequential expression of paternal and maternal es- terases in ontogenesis. Biochem. Genet., 12:1-7. Lubin, Y. D. & R. H. Crozier. 1985. Electrophoretic evidence for population differentiation in a social Achaearanea wau (Theridiidae). Insectes Soc. Paris, 32:297-304. Manchenko, G. P. 1981. Allozymic variation in ylr- aneus ( Arachnida, Aranei). Isozyme Bull., 14:78. Pennington, B. J. 1979. Enzyme genetics in taxon- omy: diagnostic enzyme loci in the spider genus Meta. Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc., 4:377-392. Roeloffs, R. & S. E. Riechert. 1988. Dispersal and population-genetic structure of the cooperative spi- der, Agelena consociata, in West African rain forest. Evolution, 42: 173-183. Smith, D. R. R. 1986. Population genetics of Ane- losimus eximius (Araneae, Theridiidae). J. Arach- nol., 14:201-217. Steiner, W. W. M. & D. J. Joslyn. 1979. Electropho- retic techniques for the genetic study of mosquitoes. Mosq. News, 39:35-54. Terranova, A. C. & S. H. Roach. 1987a. Genetic differentiation in the genus Phidippus (Araneae, Sal- ticidae). J. Arachnol., 14:385-391. Terranova, A. C. & S. H. Roach. 1987b. An electro- phoretic key for distinguishing immature and adult species of the genus Phidippus (Araneae: Salticidae) from South Carolina. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer., 80:346-352. Manuscript received January 1991, revised March 1991. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:161-168 TWO NEW SPECIES OF NESTICUS SPIDERS FROM THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS (ARANEAE, NESTICIDAE) Frederick A. Coyle and Augustus C. McGarity: Department of Biology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina 28723 USA ABSTRACT. Diagnoses, descriptions, illustrations, and natural history data are presented for two new species of Nesticus spiders: N. nasicus from epigean habitats in southwestern North Carolina, and N. gertschi from a cave in eastern Tennessee. Nesticus nasicus appears to be the sister species of Nesticus brimleyi Gertsch, a cave- dwelling species. In his pioneering revision of North and Central American nesticids, Gertsch (1984) predicted that, as greater attention was focused on these secretive cave- and litter-dwelling spiders, many new species would be added to the already large, apparently monophyletic, clade of 24 southern Appalachian species of Nesticus. We describe here a new epigean species, Nesticus nasicus, and a new cave-dwelling species, Nesticus gertschi, both of which, like the majority of the known southern Appalachian species, have restricted ranges, are allopatric, and live in eastern Tennessee and/or western North Carolina (Map 1). RELATIONSHIPS Since Gertsch (1984) did not present a cladistic analysis of relationships of Nesticus species and since we have examined specimens of only two of the 41 described species (and have therefore relied heavily on Gertsch’s drawings and descrip- tions), our hypotheses of relationship are es- pecially tentative. The numerous similarities between Nesticus nasicus and Nesticus brimleyi Gertsch strongly suggest that they are sister species. These simi- larities include the following putative synapo- morphies: 1) the broad, thin and translucent, ser- rate distal process of the paracymbium [Figs. 1- 6]; 2) the massive size of the paracymbium [Figs. 1, 6]; 3) a median palpal apophysis with two converging processes [Figs. 1, 6]; 4) a sharply tapering tegular process hidden under the me- dian apophysis [Figs. 1, 6]; and 5) a thick-walled bulb-shaped spermatheca near each lateral bor- der of the epigynum [Figs. 11, 14]. We postulate that the common ancestor of N. nasicus and N. brimleyi was, like several extant Nesticus species (Gertsch 1984), a troglophilic species consisting of both epigean and cave-dwelling populations, and that its range, restricted to a cave-poor region of the southern Blue Ridge Province, included the areas now occupied by N. nasicus and N. brimleyi (Map 1). We further suggest that the epigean populations disappeared from the slight- ly dryer (Clay et al. 1975) eastern portion of the range leaving the N. brimleyi lineage isolated in the humid refugium provided by the isolated cluster of fissure caves it now occupies. The relationships of N. gertschi are much less clear. It shares with N. nasicus and N. brimleyi the broad, translucent, spatulate, distal paracym- bial process which appears to be unique to these three species among all American Nesticus for which males are known (Figs. 1-6, 1 5-1 7). How- ever, there is no similarly distinctive female gen- ital character state shared by N. gertschi and these two species. METHODS The quantitative character values in Table 1 are an integral part of each description. These characters are abbreviated and defined as fol- lows: BL— body length; CL— carapace length; CW— carapace width; CH— clypeus height (length along median longitudinal line from edge of car- apace to line connecting lowest edges of the two ale’s, with clypeus horizontal); AMD, ALD, PMD, PLD— maximum diameters of eye pupils with each eye on horizontal plane; AMS— dis- tance between AME and ALE (each eye inter- distance is measured after positioning it on hor- izontal plane); AS— distance between AME and ALE; PMS—distance between PME’s; PS— dis- tance between PME and PLE; IFL, IPL, ITL, 161 162 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Map 1 . — Distribution of all known southern Appalachian Nesticus species, based upon locality and habitat records in Gertsch (1984). Each of the 16 species collected at only one or a cluster of neighboring localities is represented by a single symbol. Known range boundaries of the nine more widely distributed species are approximated by dotted or solid lines. IML, ITarL— lengths of leg 1 articles (distance in retrolateral view from proximal condyle to most distal point on dorsal surface); EW — distance be- tween lateral pockets of the epigynum (Fig. 1 2); MSE— length of the caudal extension of the me- dian septum (Fig. 12) (epigynum measurements made with abdomen tilted so that ventral surface of epigynum is on horizontal plane). Eye diam- eters and appendage measurements were record- ed from the left eye or appendage unless it was damaged, missing, or not fully regenerated (in which case the right structure was measured). Measurements are in mm and were recorded with a Wild M-5 stereomicroscope with 20 x oc- ular lenses and an eyepiece micrometer scale. BE, CL, CW, and leg measurements were performed at 50 X and are accurate to 0.018 mm; all other measurements were performed at lOOx and are accurate to 0.009 mm. Internal (dorsal) views of cleared (85% lactic acid) epigyna were drawn with a compound light microscope fitted with a draw- ing tube. We follow Gertsch’s ( 1 984) terminology for genital anatomy. All specimens are deposited in the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH). Nesticus nasicus, new species Figs. 1-4, 7-14. Map 1. Types.— Male holotype and one male and three female paratypes collected under loose rocks 30 m outside west entrance of Cowee Mountain train tunnel (1900 ft elev.), 1 mi W Dillsboro, Jackson County, North Carolina (28 October [holotype, 2 females] and 1 1 November [other adult male] 1 990 and 20 April 1 99 1 [penultimate male, which escaped in captivity, and female]; A. McGarity), in AMNH. Etymology.— The specific name, a Latin ad- COYLE & McGARITY-NEW SPECIES OF NESTICUS SPIDERS 163 Figures 1-6.— Palpi of Nesticus holotypes, with paracymbial processes and some other structures labeled: 1- 4, N. nasicus\ 1, ventral; 2, dorsal; 3, retrolateral view of paracymbium; 4, medial (concave) surface of para- cymbium; 5, 6, N. brimleyi\ 5, medial (concave) surface of paracymbium; 6, ventral. jective, refers to the nose-like appearance of the middle septum of the epigynum. Diagnosis. — Males of N. nasicus are readily distinguished from those of all other American Nesticus species by the broad translucent distal paracymbial process accompanied by a sharp- tipped paradistal process (Fig. 3), and from all but N. brimleyi by the distinctively shaped me- 164 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY dian apophysis and tegular process (Fig. 1). The following features of the palp, particularly the position and shape of the paracymbial processes, distinguish N. nasicus males from those of its sister species, N. brimleyi: 1) ventromedial par- acymbial process absent [Fig. 4] vs. present [Figs. 5, 6]; 2) dorsomedial paracymbial process pres- ent [Figs. 2-4] vs. absent [Fig. 5]; 3) paradisial paracymbial process narrow and pointed [Figs. 2-4] vs. broad and blunt [Fig. 5]; 4) dorsal par- acymbial process tapers to a single point [Figs. 1-3] vs. truncate with three or more irregular points [Figs. 5, 6]; 5) distal paracymbial process rounded [Fig. 3] vs. angular; 6) base of tegular process evenly curved and gradually tapering [Fig. 1] vs. a lobe-like shoulder [Fig. 6]; 7) tegular process with one vs. two dorsal keels; 8) lateral projection of median apophysis relatively long and strongly curved [Fig. 1] vs. short and weakly curved [Fig. 6]; 9) middle loop of seminal tube broad at base and blunt [Fig. 1] vs. relatively narrow at base and long [Fig. 6]. Additionally, the legs of N. nasicus males are proportionately much shorter [Table 1, ITL(100)/CL] than those of N. brimleyi. Females of N. nasicus are most readily distinguished from those of other Amer- ican Nesticus species by their unique, medially directed, epigynal pockets [Figs. 9, 11, 12, 14]. Although it was not possible for us to examine N. brimleyi females, Gertsch’s (1984) figs. 138- 140 and description reveal the following dis- tinctive N. nasicus traits: 1) lateral epigynal pockets [Figs. 9, 11, 12, 14] not present on N. brimleyi', 2) much darker abdominal pigmenta- tion [Figs. 7, 8] than N. brimleyi', and 3) legs proportionately much shorter [ITL(100)/CL = 142-161] than those of N. brimleyi [ITL(IOO)/ CL =214]. Males.— Table 1. Palpus [Figs. 1-4] with large paracymbium with broad, translucent, serrate distal process; sharp-tipped paradistal apophy- sis; thin dark distomedial process; prominent ventral process with distal edge turned outward; thin, sharp-tipped, leaf-like dorsal process, ser- rate and very thin on its ectal edge; and thin dark dorsomedial process on base of dorsal process. Tegular process tapers to sharp tip behind me- dian apophysis, with dorsal keel visible in pro- lateral view. Median apophysis with large, roughly serrate, lateral process and prominent distal pro- cess with twisted tip. AME’s with well-defined lenses. Color very similar to that of females ex- cept carapace less heavily pigmented. Females,— Table 1. Epigynum [Figs. 9-14] with prominent median septum with rather broad rounded caudal projection; medially facing lat- eral pocket on each side; two avocado-shaped spermathecae (one ectal to each pocket) visible in cleared dorsal view; keel-like rim borders each atriobursal orifice, the two rims together forming a V-shaped pattern in posterior view. AME’s [Fig. 8] with well-defined lenses. Color [Figs. 7, 8] of appendages chiefly pale tan but whiter or darker in places; carapace very pale tan with grey pig- ment as in Fig. 8; abdomen dorsally with seg- mental series of large paired lateral areas of grey on white background. Variation.— Although there is no noteworthy variation within either population sample, the two populations differ in the following female characteristics, most of which are epigynum fea- tures. 1) The caudal lobe of the median septum of the Wolf Creek sample [n = 4] is absolutely [MSE = 0.111-0.129, mean = 0.123 ±0.009] and proportionately longer [MSE(100)/EW = 26.1-32.6, mean = 29.3 ±2.8] [Fig. 12] than that of the type sample [n = 3] [MSE = 0.056-0.093, mean = 0.074 ±0.018; MSE(100)/EW = 10.7- 20.0, mean = 15.6 ±4.7] [Fig. 9]. In posterior view the dorsal contour of this lobe, enlarged as it is in the Wolf Creek specimens, presents a distinct transverse upcurved line [Fig. 13] not present in the paratypes [Fig. 10]. 2) Each of the two diagonal keels forming the V-shaped rim bordering the atriobursal orifices and visible in posterior view is entire in the Wolf Creek spec- imens [Fig. 1 3] and not interrupted as in two of the three paratypes [Fig. 10]. 3) The external lat- eral epigynal pockets tend to be smaller and di- rected more anteriorly in the Wolf Creek speci- mens [Figs. 12, 14] than in the paratypes [Figs. 9, 1 1 ]. 4) The first leg articles are proportionately longer in the Wolf Creek specimens [ITL(IOO)/ CL = 152-161, mean = 158 ±4.2)] than in the paratypes [ITL( 1 00)/CL = 142-147, mean = 146 ±2.7)]. These differences suggest that there may be little or no gene flow across the 1 1 miles sepa- rating these local populations. Determining whether this is the case and whether these pop- ulations are reproductively isolated requires the collection and study of males from Wolf Creek, a search for geographically intermediate popu- lations, and, most importantly, cross-mating tri- als. The small allopatric geographic ranges char- acteristic of most of the southern Appalachian species (Map 1) suggest that low vagility is a common Nesticus trait. COYLE & McGARITY-NEW SPECIES OF NESTICUS SPIDERS 165 Figures 7-14.— A. nasicus females; 7-11, paratypes; 7, lateral view of body; 8, dorsal view of body; 9-11, epigynum; 9, ventral; 10, posterior; 11, dorsal (cleared); 12-14, specimen from Wolf Creek; 12, ventral; 13, posterior; 14, dorsal (cleared). Scale lines: 0.5 mm for Figs. 7, 8; 0.2 mm for Figs. 9-14. Natural history.-— The Cowee Mountain spec- imens were living just outside the train tunnel on the undersides of rocks which had fallen from a high rock cut and accumulated in a wet leaf litter-filled depression between the base of the cut and the railway roadbed. The holotype male and two females were collected under the same large flat rock; the females were in small webs consisting of a sparse asymmetrical mesh of silk threads extending from the underside of this rock to smaller rocks beneath. The adult female col- lected on 20 April had just molted. The absence 166 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1.— Quantitative character values for Nesticus species. Characters are defined in methods section of text. All measurements in mm. Range, mean, and standard deviation given for large sample. * The second value for each character is from the holotype. ** Except for CH, the first value for each character is from the holotype; values for the second male are from Gertsch (1984), who erroneously indicated that the specimen he measured was the holotype. nasicus brim ley i gertschi Males* (« = 2) Females in = 7) Males** {n = 2) Male Female BL 2.42, 2.66 2.41-3.07 (2.72 ± 0.26) 3.14, 4.00 3.48 3.42 CL 1.28, 1.43 1.18-1.33 (1.28 ±0.05) 1.74, 2.00 1.61 1.31 CW 1.11, 1.24 1.04-1.15 (1.11 ±0.04) 1.52, 1.75 1.37 1.48 CH 0.231, 0.259 0.176-0.231 (0.201 ± 0.017) 0.350, 0.361 0.296 0.250 AMD 0.028, 0.037 0.028-0.037 (0.032 ± 0.005) 0.037 0.037 0.037 ALD 0.102, 0.102 0.074-0.093 (0.087 ± 0.007) 0.111 0.083 0.093 PMD 0.093, 0.093 0.093-0.102 (0.095 ± 0.005) 0.093 0.083 0.083 PLD 0.093, 0.093 0.083-0.102(0.094 ± 0.006) 0.093 0.093 0.102 AMS 0.037, 0.065 0.037-0.056 (0.049 ± 0.007) 0.083 0.037 0.046 AS 0.046, 0.056 0.046-0.056 (0.049 ± 0.005) 0.074 0.074 0.065 PMS 0.093, 0.102 0.083-0.111 (0.096 ± 0.009) 0.139 0.129 0.129 PS 0.056, 0.065 0.046-0.074(0.057 ± 0.010) 0.083 0.083 0.074 IFL 2.07, 2.44 1.89-2.20 (2.07 ±0.12) 3.92, 4.80 3.63 2.89 IPL 0.56, 0.65 0.52-0.59 (0.57 ± 0.03) 0.80, 1.00 0.72 0.65 ITL 2.04, 2.44 1.74-2.09 (1.95 ±0.12) 4.14, 5.15 3.74 2.79 IML 1.87, 2.18 1.55-1.85 (1.72 ±0.10) 3.85, 4.50 3.37 2.48 ITarL 0.89, 1.04 0.83-0.93 (0.88 ± 0.03) 1.48, 1.50 1.35 1.15 EW 0.40-0.52 (0.45 ± 0.04) MSE 0.056-0.129(0.102 ± 0.029) MSE(100)/EW 10.7-32.6 (23.4 ±8.1) ITL(100)/CL 159, 171 142-161 (153 ±8) 238, 258 232 213 AMD(100)/CH 12.0, 14.3 13.0-19.0 (15.8 ±2.4) 10.3 12.5 14.8 AMD(100)/CW 2.5, 3.0 2.4-3. 3 (2.8 ± 0.4) 2.4 2.7 2.5 of Nesticus within the dark but dry train tunnel and on the surface of the moist north-facing rock cut above the inhabited rock pile indicates that N. nasicus requires both very high humidity and very low light intensity. The other N. nasicus population sample was collected in the leaf litter of a mesic deciduous forest on steep rocky north- and south-facing slopes on each side of Wolf Creek. Tullgren fun- nel extraction of this leaf litter collected on 14 and 16 November yielded two adult females, four antepenultimate or penultimate females, two penultimate males, two antepenultimate males, and three younger juveniles (CW = 2.68-4.16 mm). These data and the presence of adult fe- males at the type locality during both fall and spring indicate that N. nasicus adults may occur during most or all of the year, as is true for at least some of the other species of Nesticus (Gertsch 1 984), and that mating and egg-laying may there- fore occur during several months of each year. Extended reproductive activity, an extreme case being the year-round egg-laying exhibited by cave populations of the nesticid Eidmanella pallida (Ives 1935) and many other cave animals (Ho- warth 1 983), may constitute a primitive Nesticus cave-related trait which is expressed even in ep- igean species like N. nasicus. Distribution.— Known from two localities 11 miles apart in the mountains of southwestern North Carolina (Map 1). Other material examined. — NORTH CAROLINA: Jackson Co., Wolf Creek, 5 mi S Cullowhee, 2400 ft elev., deciduous forest leaf litter, 13 September 1990 (A. McGarity), 1 female; 24 October 1990 (A. Mc- Garity), 1 female, 1 juv.; 14 November 1990(F. Coyle), 1 female, 10 juvs.; 16 November 1990 (R. Dellinger), 1 female, 1 juv.; 24 February 1991 (F. Coyle), 2 juvs. Nesticus gertschi, new species Figs. 15-20. Map 1. Types. — Male holotype and one female para- type collected 100 m inside Cedar Creek Cave (1400 ft elev.), Cedar Creek, Greene County, COYLE & McGARITY-NEW SPECIES OF NESTICUS SPIDERS 167 Figures 15-20.— N. gertschi: 15-17, holotype palpus; 15, ventral; 16, dorsal; 17, retrolateral view of paracym- bium; 18-20, paratype epigynum; 18, ventral; 19, posterior; 20, dorsal (cleared). Tennessee (16 March 1991; A. McGarity), in AMNH. Etymology. —The specific name is a patronym in honor of Dr. Willis J. Gertsch, the first revisor of American nesticids. Diagnosis.— Among known species of Appa- lachian Nesticus, N. gertschi is one of only three species (including N. brimleyi and N. nasicus) with a broad, thin, translucent, serrate, distal paracymbial process (Fig. 1 7) and is the only one with a single, very long, flat, broad tegular pro- cess (Fig. 1 5). The collective shapes and positions of other paracymbial processes also distinguish this species (Figs. 15-17). The combination of the curved, ectally-facing, external epigynal grooves on each side of the median septum (Fig. 1 8), the large, sclerotized, internal anterior lobes (Figs. 18, 20), and the elongate, nearly banana- shaped spermathecae (Fig. 20) distinguish N. gertschi females from those of all other Appa- lachian Nesticus species. Male.— Table 1 . Palpus (Figs. 15-17) with large paracymbium with broad, translucent, slightly serrate distal process, two subdistal processes on dorsal edge, a thin, sharp-tipped, leaf-like dorsal process, and a prominent ventral process with 168 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY distal edge turned outward; tegular process long, broad, and thin with distomedial angle expanded toward distal lobe of median apophysis; median apophysis with broad, spatulate, roughly serrate lateral process and broad, angular, spatulate dis- tal process. AME’s with well-defined lenses. Col- or as in female except appendages darker tan than those of female. Female.— Table 1 . Epigynum (Eigs. 1 8-20) with rather prominent broad median septum with lit- tle, if any, caudal extension; depression on each side of median septum with prominent, curved ectally-facing groove with sclerotized rim and more anteriorly and laterally a less conspicuous, curved medially-facing rim; two elongate sper- mathecae almost banana-shaped; two large, in- ternal well-sclerotized lobes extending forward at anterior of epigynum; shallow keel-like rim borders each atriobursal orifice, the two rims converging dorsally in posterior view. AME’s with well-defined lenses. Color of appendages very pale tan; carapace white to very pale tan with scat- tered areas of faint grey pigment on pars ce- phalica and around lateral border of pars thor- acica, except dark amber to black around each eye; abdomen dorsally with segmental series of very small, faint, paired, lateral areas of grey on lighter pale beige-grey background. Natural History. — The two specimens were collected in separate small concavites (19, 15 cm high; 15, 16 cm wide; 10, 6 cm deep) in the cave wall approximately 100 m from the entrance in the moist dark zone of the cave. Each spider was suspended back-downward from (or close to) the ceiling of its concavity and in the upper denser part of its web, a loose irregular mesh of threads confined to the upper portion of the concavity. When collected ( 1 6 March), both specimens were in the penultimate instar. They were kept in the dark at 15 °C and 85% relative humidity and molted to adults five (male) and ten (female) days later. Distribution.- Known only from the type lo- cality in the mountains of eastern Tennessee (Map 1). Other material examined.— None. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank N. I. Platnick (AMNH) for loaning us the holotype of N. brimleyi and R. G. Bennett for helpful comments on the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Clay, J. W., D. M. On- & A. W. Stuart. 1975. North Carolina Atlas. Univ. of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill. Gertsch, W. J. 1984. The spider family Nesticidae (Araneae) in North America, Central America, and the West Indies. Texas Mem. Museum Bull., 31:1- 91. Howarth, F. G. 1983. Ecology of cave arthropods. Ann. Rev. EntomoL, 28:365-389. Ives, J. D. 1935. A study of the cave spider, Nesticus pallidus Emerton, to determine whether it breeds seasonally or otherwise. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc., 51:297-299. Manuscript received May 1991, revised October 1991. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:169-173 EVIDENCE FOR IDIOTHETICALLY CONTROLLED TURNS AND EXTRAOCULAR PHOTORECEPTION IN LYCOSID SPIDERS Jerome S. Rovner: Dept, of Zoological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701 USA ABSTRACT. During some of the intervals between bouts of pheromone-stimulated courtship display, iso- lated male Rabidosa rabida (Araneae, Lycosidae) perform a single pivot. In an investigation of the control of this turning behavior, males were tested under four conditions. Two of these were visual, a uniform environment or one with images, and two were non-visual, all eyes occluded or dim red lighting. The turning angle and the tendency to change the direction of turning were measured for the first three conditions, and no significant differences were found. This suggests that the turns are controlled idiothetically. Another parameter, the tendency to perform the turns, was reduced under dim red light but not in blinded spiders under white light, the latter suggesting the occurrence of extraocular photoreception. When animals organize their behavior with respect to spatial features, they use information obtained from external directing stimuli (alloth- etic orientation) or from internal sources (idioth- etic orientation). The latter may depend either on proprioceptive information or on central ner- vous system (nonsensory) programs that contain the necessary information for spatial execution of movements (Schone 1984). The present study deals with the question of whether rotational lo- comotion that occurs during courtship behavior in isolated male lycosid spiders is influenced by visual stimuli or is under idiothetic control. The display of Rabidosa rabida (Walckenaer) occurs in discrete bouts. In each bout the palps are waved in alternation, and then the right or left leg I is extended coincident with palpal-pro- duced sounds. Both of the latter elements end abruptly in synchrony. A pause follows, during which time a receptive female, if present, signals her response. Thus, the male’s distinct bouts of display alternate with inter-bout intervals, pro- viding a basis for reciprocal signaling between the sexes. When this species’ display was quantitatively analyzed (Rovner 1968), the data were obtained from males in the presence of females. However, when males in isolation are stimulated to display by contact with the female’s sex pheromone, an additional behavior occurs. During some of the inter-bout intervals, such males perform a single pivoting turn. Rovner (1991) hypothesized that this rotational locomotion represents a compo- nent of a local search pattern. Apparently, it is added to the behavior of a male in the courtship mode if he has failed to detect a responding fe- male during the early phase of courtship. Since turning behavior in animals can be in- fluenced by goal-related images or by the level of illumination (Schone 1984), I examined whether such visual input plays a role in the inter-bout turning behavior of isolated male R. rabida. I tested spiders in well-lit arenas with or without fixed images and also tested them under non-visual conditions: in darkness (dim red light) or after occlusion of the eyes. METHODS Fifty male and 1 0 female Rabidosa rabida (for- merly Lycosa rabida) were collected as penulti- mate instars in early July 1989 in a field in Ath- ens County, Ohio. Spiders were not used until 1 week or more after the final molt. Methods of maintenance and laboratory conditions during testing were described previously (Rovner 1 989). The testing arena was a glass bowl with a slop- ing wall, on the inside of which a coat of flat, pale green, non-toxic paint had been applied to provide a uniform, non-reflecting surface. The bottom was covered with a cardboard disk, over which was placed a pale green sheet of paper 11.3 cm in diameter (about 100 cm^). The latter was replaced with a fresh sheet for each test, so that silk or chemicals deposited on the substrate by 169 170 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY one spider could not remain to influence sub- sequent individuals. A vertical cardboard barrier visually isolated the arena from my location. For most test conditions, non-directional il- lumination was provided by a 32 W, soft- white, circular fluorescent bulb centered over the arena (height = 50 cm above the arena floor). The level of illumination at the arena floor was about 700 lux (Gossen Luna-Pro meter), comparable to the light level in a deciduous forest understory on a sunny day. For a test condition without visible light being available to the spiders, a dim red light was pro- vided by Kodak Safelight (No. 1 filter; 15 W incandescent bulb) placed 20 cm above the arena floor. The filter passed wavelengths >610 nm. Even under bright white light, the sensitivity of the largest eyes (posterior median) of wolf spiders falls off sharply above 550 nm, especially if the spiders are light-adapted when tested (DeVoe et al. 1969), as was the case in the present study. The single window in the laboratory was covered with opaque material, and tests under this con- dition were conducted after dark in the late eve- ning. With this arrangement, a very low level of red light (about 2-4 lux) reached the arena floor, just sufficient for my direct observations but not adequate for monitoring or recording by video. Consequently, only the number of display bouts and turns (not turning angles) was included in the data for this test condition. To determine whether the dim red light con- dition insured total darkness for the spiders, I ran a preliminary check on 20 males in the fol- lowing manner. Pairs of males were vibrationally isolated in separate cages that allowed visual con- tact (Rovner 1 989) and were observed under the dim red light until one of the males had initiated walking and performed three passes across his cage. None of the males showed a response to a walking male under this condition. They sub- sequently oriented and showed courtship display to such a stimulus after I switched on a white light (an exposed 10 W bulb 25 cm above the cages that provided about 300 lux illumination). On this basis, the dim red tight was judged sat- isfactory for insuring darkness. Observations and data recording in the three test conditions run under white fluorescent light were done with the aid of a video camera (JVC model GX-8NU), a remote-controlled videocas- sette recorder (Sony model SL-HFR70), and a video monitor. A character generator (JVC mod- el CG-C7U) provided an on-screen stopwatch (reading to 0. 1 s) and titles identifying each test. The video recorder was located on a separate table 1.2 m from the testing arena to prevent possible vibratory stimulation. The camera faced obliquely upward toward a front-silvered mirror clamped above the testing arena at a 45° angle to the floor. This gave a dorsal view of the spider, essential for later measurement of turning angles (by use of a protractor placed over the still frame on-screen). Due to limitations imposed by the resolution of the video image, I could accurately measure angles only to the nearest 5°. Each male to be tested was transferred in a plastic vial from its home cage to the arena. I allowed the spider to slide gently onto a centrally located stimulus source, a square section (6.25 cm^) of a larger piece of paper that had served as the floor covering in a female’s cage for a number of days. I then sat out of sight of the arena and viewed the monitor. As soon as the male began courtship display, I remotely acti- vated the video recorder and kept it running for the next 10 min. Twenty males were tested only once, and 30 males were used twice, i.e., in two of the four test conditions, mixed through all of the treatments. When a male was used twice, the tests were separated by several days, so as to achieve a reasonable level of independence. The four conditions examined were: (1) fixed images on arena wall, (2) uniform arena wall, (3) dim red light, and (4) occluded eyes. While tests under the red light condition were run only in the late evening, those under the other three con- ditions were run throughout the day and evening. Twenty males were tested under each condition. The stimuli used for testing the influence of images consisted of two identical silhouettes of the front view of female wolf spiders, comparable to shapes presented to salticid spiders by various workers, including Crane (1949), but remaining fixed rather than being moved like those usually used for salticids. I attached the images to the arena wall opposite each other and at floor level so as to simulate the appearance of female con- specifics resting at the arena’s edge. I used more than one image to insure that the male had an easy opportunity to pick up the potential stim- ulus within his visual field soon after his entry into the arena, no matter which direction he faced initially. The maximum distance from the spider to an image was well within the range of detect- ability, based on data from a previous study (Rovner 1989). To occlude the eyes, I covered them with two. ROVNER-TURNS IN LYCOSID SPIDERS 171 Table 1.— Inter-bout turning behavior in courting male Rabidosa rabida. There were no differences among turning angles (Kruskal-Wallis, = 1.149) or series lengths of turns in the same direction (H^ = 1.316). Data were based on 10 males/condition. Condition Number of turns Turning angle (degrees) Series of turns in same direction Turning angle x series length Fixed images 70 62 ± 45.9 2.6 ± 2.21 155° Uniform wall 85 67 ± 55.3 2.8 ± 1.81 201° Occluded eyes 107 61 ± 40.2 2.9 ± 1.90 183° Grand mean ± SD 63 ± 47.0 2.8 ± 1.96 176° separately applied, coats of water-based enamel (Top Color Hobbylack, Pelikan AG). That this insured complete occlusion had been established previously (ibid.). Data on turning angles were based on the mag- nitude of each turn, irrespective of direction. Where appropriate, I present these and other data as X ± SD. Analyses of data involved Kruskal- Wallis tests (corrected for ties) and t-tests of arc- sine-transformed percentages (Sokal & Rohlf 1969). RESULTS Occurrence of turns.— During courtship, an “inter-bout intervaP’ that was 6.7 ± 1.51 s in duration followed each bout of display, and there was a mean of 3.0 ± 0.83 display bouts/min. After an early phase of courtship in which no locomotion occurred during the inter-bout in- tervals, the male pivoted in place during 2 1 .4% of the subsequent inter-bout intervals. (A small amount of forward locomotion sometimes oc- curred during an inter-bout interval; however, the nature of such linear locomotion was not addressed in the present study.) A pause always preceded inter-bout locomotion, during which Table 2.— Tendency of male Rabidosa rabida to per- form inter-bout turns. Data were based on 20 males/ condition. (For / = 1.96, P = 0.05.) Condi- tion Total turns Total bouts Per- cent t P Fixed images Uniform 121 599 20.2 1.93 >0.05 wall 157 632 24.8 3.15 <0.01 Red light Occluded 93 537 17.3 2.31 <0.05 eyes 145 638 22.7 time a receptive female, had one been present, would have performed her receptive display. Turning never occurred during the male’s bouts of courtship display. Turning angle.— Turns resulted from forward steps by the legs of one side of the spider and reverse steps by the contralateral legs. (Some spi- ders occasionally made very small turns of 1 5° or less, resulting from a single remotion of one or two anterior-most ipsilateral legs. Such cases lacking bilateral appendage involvement were not included in the analyses.) Turning angle, which had a mean of 63 ± 47.0°, was independent of the presence or absence of fixed, spider-like im- ages and of whether the eyes were occluded or not (Table 1). Turning direction.— Viewed dorsally, turns were either clockwise or counterclockwise, with both directions equally represented in the data, i.e., no handedness. Although in about one-third of the cases a directional change occurred after only one turn in the other direction, in the ma- jority of cases the spiders performed a series of turns in one direction, then a series in the other direction. Since turns only occurred during inter- bout intervals and only during about a fifth of these intervals, it must be kept in mind that a “series” of turns involved behavioral events sep- arated by time and by other activity. The number of turns in a series of unidirectional turns ranged from two to eight {X = 2.8 ± 1.96) and was independent of the presence or absence of fixed, spider-like images and of whether the eyes were occluded or not (Table 1). Turning tendency.— The percentage of court- ship bouts followed by turns was regarded as an indicator of turning tendency (Table 2). Com- parisons of arcsine-transformed percentages be- tween treatment groups revealed significant dif- ferences in two cases: (1) Spiders tested under red light turned less often than those under white 172 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY light in uniform arenas. (2) Blinded spiders under white light turned more often than untreated spi- ders under red light. A difference just shy of sig- nificance was also noted: Untreated spiders ex- posed to fixed images turned less often than those surrounded by a uniform wall. Some of the for- mer did maintain an initial orientation toward an image for a period of time after their intro- duction to the arena. DISCUSSION Orientation behavior in animals can involve a mechanism that relies on external input or can be controlled entirely by an internal mechanism (Schone 1984). Data obtained in the present study suggested that pivoting turns occurring during courtship in isolated male lycosid spiders can be performed independently of external stimuli. The methods eliminated vibrational cues since no fe- male was present; and directional lighting was avoided as well. Testing in the presence or ab- sence of fixed images and testing under greatly different illumination levels were the approaches used to determine the possible influence of cer- tain visual stimuli on the orientation behavior being studied. When provided with fixed, spider-like images, male R. rabida did not show significant differ- ences in either turning angles or turning series lengths from those of spiders in a uniform en- vironment. Such data support the view of Hom- ann (1931), who stated that the eyes of wolf spi- ders are adapted for the detection of movement. However, turning tendency was almost signifi- cantly less for spiders exposed to the fixed images compared to those in a uniform environment. This resulted from some spiders having tem- porarily held an orientation toward an image de- tected at the time of introduction to the arena. Crane (1949) also observed this occasionally in salticids, which usually do not respond to a fixed image. She suggested that when a spider is dropped into the arena “the visual effect to the spider may be similar to that obtained when the stimulus is moving”. The size of inter-bout turns was the same in R. rabida with occluded eyes as in untreated in- dividuals, which suggests that these turns are controlled endogenously. Such self-steered turns are well known in various arthropods and were thoroughly analyzed in a series of studies on courtship turning in the cockroach Blattella ger- manica (Bell et al. 1978; Bell & Schal 1980; Franklin et al. 1981). However, one cannot be completely certain that turning behavior in any arthropod is under idiothetic control until tests employing Helmholtz coils are used to eliminate the remote possibility of geomagnetic orientation (Havukkala & Kennedy 1984). The tendency of male R. rabida to turn during the inter-bout interval was affected by the level of illumination. Spiders under dim red light had a lower turning tendency than that of spiders under white light in uniform arenas and had the lowest numbers of courtship bouts and inter-bout turns of all groups. Interestingly, Frings (1941) had found that R. rabida became less active (“akinetic”) under reduced illumination; and he judged this to be the reason (rather than negative phototaxis) that the spiders ended up in the shad- ed chamber of a choice box. If male R. rabida have a reduced level of inter- bout turning under dim red light, why then did the spiders which also seemingly experienced complete darkness due to occlusion of the eyes show the same turning tendency as untreated spi- ders under white light? Interestingly, Kapoor (1971) found that blinded pumpkinseed fish re- sponding to different levels of illumination showed changes in turning angle like those of untreated fish, and he noted that the fish’s pineal photoreceptor can mediate such responses. Re- cent electrophysiological studies by Yamashita (1986) revealed that efferent neurons in the brain of two species of araneid spiders were sensitive to light. The behavioral data described here for R. rabida raise the possibility that extraocular photoreception also occurs in lycosid spiders, an hypothesis that requires electrophysiological confirmation in a future study. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The video equipment was obtained with sup- port from the Baker Fund of Ohio University. I thank G. E. Svendsen for statistical advice, and W. J. Bell, G. E. Stratton, and R. B. Suter for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper. LITERATURE CITED Bell, W. J., S. B. Vuturo & M. Bennett. 1978. En- dokinetic turning and programmed courtship acts of the male German cockroach. J. Insect Physiol., 24:369-374. Bell, W. J. & C. Schal. 1980. Patterns of turning in courtship orientation of the male German cock- roach. Anim. Behav., 28:86-94. Crane, J. 1949. Comparative biology of salticid spi- ROVNER-TURNS IN LYCOSID SPIDERS 173 ders at Rancho Grande, Venezuela, Part IV. An analysis of display. Zoologica, 34:159-215. DeVoe, R. D., R. J. W. Small & J. E. Zvargulis. 1969. Spectral sensitivities of wolf spider eyes. J. Gen. Physiol., 54:1-32. Franklin, R.,W.J. Bell &R.Jander. 1981. Rotational locomotion by the cockroach Blattella germanica. J. Insect Physiol., 27:249-255. Frings, H. 1941. Stereokinetic and photokinetic re- sponses of Lycosa rabida, Calosoma lugubre, and Harpalus caliginosus. J. Comp. Psychol., 32:367- 377. Havukkala, I. J. & J. S. Kennedy. 1984. A pro- gramme of self-steered turns as a humidity response in Tenebrio, and the problem of categorizing spatial manoeuvres. Physiol. Entomol., 9:157-164. Homann, H. 1931. Beitrage zur physiologic der Spin- nenaugen. III. Das Sehvermogen der Lycosiden. Z. vergl. Physiol., 14:40-67. Kapoor, N. N. 1971. Locomotory patterns of fish (Lepomis gibbosus) under different levels of illu- mination. Anim. Behav., 19:744-749. Rovner, J. S. 1968. An analysis of display in the lycosid spider rabida Walckenaer. Anim. Be- hav., 16:358-369. Rovner, J. S. 1989. Wolf spiders lack mirror-image responsiveness seen in jumping spiders. Anim. Be- hav., 38:526-533. Rovner, J.S. 1991. Turning behaviour during phero- mone-stimulated courtship in wolf spiders. Anim. Behav., 42:1015-1016. Schone, H. 1984. Spatial Orientation: The Spatial Control of Behavior in Animals and Man. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf 1969. Biometry. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco. Yamashita, S. 1986. Cerebral photosensitive neurons in the orb-weaving spiders Argiope bruennichii and A. amoena. Proc. 9th Intern. Congr. ArachnoL, Pan- ama 1983: 332. Manuscript received March 1991. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:174-209 HAWAIIAN SPIDERS OF THE GENUS TETRAGNATHA: L SPINY LEG GLADE Rosemary G. Gillespie: Department of Zoology and Hawaiian Evolutionary Biology Program, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 USA ABSTRACT. The Hawaiian archipelago is well known for some of the most spectacular species radiations from single ancestors, although the occurrence of this phenomenon in spiders remains largely undocumented. The present study introduces the radiation of the highly diverse spider genus Tetmgnatha in Hawaii. Preliminary studies indicate that the Hawaiian Tetragnatha can be divided into distinct clades, and this paper describes representatives of the Spiny Leg clade. These species are characterized by the many, robust spines on their legs, and the abandonment of web-building activity. There are 12 species in this clade, ten of which are new and described in this paper: T. tantalus n. sp., T. polychromata n. sp., T. hrevignatha n. sp., T. macracantha n. sp., T. waikamoi n. sp. and T. kauaiensis Simon (in the Green Spiny Legs group), T. kamakou n. sp. and T. perreimi n. sp. (m the Green and Red Spiny Legs group), and and T. mohihi n. sp. (in no distinct group). The Hawaiian archipelago possesses some of the most extraordinary faunal assemblages in the world. Explosive diversification of species from a single ancestor has occurred repeatedly, often accompanied by radical shifts in morphology, ecology and behavior. Some of the best examples of this phenomenon can be found within the hon- eycreepers (subfamily Drepanidinae in the Frin- gillidae) (Berger 1981; Freed et al. 1 987), the land snails (Cooke et al. 1960) and in the spectacular radiation within the family Drosophilidae, with over 500 endemic species (Kaneshiro and Boake 1987). This paper is the first in a series that will document such a radiation in a genus of Ha- waiian spiders. Systematic studies on native spiders in Hawaii are few, and, with the noted exception of thom- isids(Suman 1964, 1970), and ecological studies on the theridiid Theridion grallator Simon (Gil- lespie 1989, 1990; Gillespie and Tabashnik 1989, 1990; Gon 1985), have been largely ignored for almost a century. Even the studies of the late 1 9th century were very incomplete (Karsch 1 880; Simon 1900; Okuma 1988c). Based on the col- lection of R. C. L. Perkins, Simon (1900) rec- ognized the speciose nature of one or a few genera in four spider families: Theridiidae, Salticidae, Thomisidae and Tetragnathidae. The usefulness of this reference, however, is limited primarily because Perkins’ spider collection, by his own admission, was incomplete and unrepresentative (Perkins 1913): spiders were collected only in ’. pilosa n. sp., T. quasimodo n. sp., T. restricta Simon passing during his daylight searching for birds and insects, or while he collected insects attracted to a light at night. The majority of endemic Ha- waiian spiders are strictly nocturnal and ex- tremely difficult to find during the day (pers. obs.), and they cannot be attracted by lights; it is there- fore not surprising that they are under-repre- sented in his collections. Also, recent studies (Gillespie, in prep.) reveal that there was a good deal of confusion in Simon’s assignation of spe- cies. For example, he discusses the unique mor- phological features of the “Spiny Leg’’ Tetmg- natha Latreille, yet the holotype of one of the three he describes bears no spines, while the paratypes are mixed with those that do. This study introduces the radiation of the long- jawed orb-weaving spider genus Tetragnatha in Hawaii, one of the most morphologically and ecologically diverse group of spiders in the is- lands. Consider what is known of the genus out- side Hawaii: Of all spiders, Tetragnatha are among the most abundant worldwide (Levi 1981). They are also a very homogeneous group of spi- ders, in both morphology (elongate bodies and legs, and large chelicerae and endites [Kaston 1 948]) and ecology (Dabrowska Prot and Luczak 1968 a and b; Dabrowska Prot et al. 1968; Gil- lespie 1986). They are characterized by the con- struction of an orb web with an open hub (Wiehle 1963), the structure being extremely light and fragile with low adhesiveness (Yoshida 1987). It is generally built over water or in other wet places 174 GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 175 (Gillespie 1987a). Construction of a web neces- sitates ambush predation in the genus as a whole, although individuals of certain species are ca- pable of capturing prey without the use of a web (Luczak and Dabrowska Prot 1966; Levi 1981; Gillespie 1 987b). Now consider the genus in Ha- waii: Here, in stark contrast to what is known of the genus worldwide, the lineage is highly spe- ciose (Simon 1 900), diverse in both morphology and ecology. It now seems likely that there are at least as many species endemic to Hawaii as there are in the entire continent of Asia. Preliminary phylogenetic studies using mor- phological and molecular data (Croom, et al, 1991; Gillespie, Croom and Palumbi, in prep.) indicate that the Hawaiian Tetragnatha can be divided into distinct clades, each with its own unique set of characteristics. At present we define three (or four) major clades. This paper describes the species in the Spiny Leg clade, i.e., the major Spiny Leg species group. Cladistic analyses using a total of 46 morphological and ecological char- acters indicate that the Spiny Leg clade is mono- phyletic (Gillespie, Croom and Palumbi, in prep.). The same result is found using an independent data set from mitochondrial DNA (Croom, et al, 1991). This paper itself, however, does not ad- dress phylogenetic issues. There are two distinct groups within the Spiny Leg clade: the Green Spiny Legs {T. tantalus, T. polychromata, T. brevignatha, T. macracantha, T. waikamoi and T. kauaiensis) and the Green and Red Spiny Legs {T. kamakou and T. per- reirai). The remaining species {T. pilosa, T. quas- imodo, T. restricta and T. mohihi) belong to nei- ther group. My criteria to recognize species are: 1) distinct differences (internally homogeneous) in one or more gross morphological characters; and 2) con- sistent differences in genitalic structure. This method is obviously a conservative means of determining true species identity. Some may judge the differences between certain populations (e.g., T. kamakou and T. quasimodo on different islands) sufficient to assign these to separate spe- cies. However, mating experiments between these populations reveal that coupling is possible, with palpal insertion into the seminal receptacles (Gil- lespie, in prep.), although I do not know whether sperm transfer occurred. Future research may determine these to be separate species, but in the absence of evidence for reproductive isolation I consider them different populations of a single species. Further species may also be added to the clade as more specimens are accumulated from different areas, revealing hitherto unknown taxa. METHODS Characters examined.— Gross morphological features were investigated using a dissecting mi- croscope and illustrated using a camera lucida attachment. For each individual examined, mea- surements were taken of the separation between each of the eyes, tooth pattern on the chelicerae (both pro- and retromarginal), fang structure, form and spination of the first and third leg (I and III representing the greatest divergence in leg function), and form and pattern of the dorsum and venter of the abdomen, the carapace and sternum. In order to estimate variability within a taxon, and determine which features best char- acterized a species, I attempted to measure at least 6 individuals of each sex of each species, with cursory observations on other individuals once diagnostic characters had been identified. These measurements were possible for all species except T. tantalus females and T. perreirai, both of which are localized and not common. At pres- ent no female has been found for T. mohihi. The genitalia of both sexes were examined us- ing a compound microscope and illustrated using a camera lucida. The female seminal receptacles were dissected out, the muscle tissue digested using Evans-Browning solution, and the struc- ture cleared and mounted temporarily on a slide in Hoyers medium. The male palps were ex- amined by removing the left palp and placing it temporarily on a slide in glycerol beneath a moveable coverslip, allowing rotation of the structure in order to determine the shape of the conductor under low power. Palps and seminal receptacles were subsequently stored in micro- vials with the specimen. Scanning electron microscopy was conducted on the palps of paratype males. Palps were re- moved from the body and placed in plastic cap- sules with the central portion removed and nylon mesh placed inside the capsule (to allow ex- change of alcohol and COj, while retaining the specimen). Filled capsules were put through an alcohol series (70%, 85%, 95% and pure ethanol), then dried with an Autosamdri-8 10 Critical Point Dryer. Palps were removed from the capsules, mounted on stubs using silver paste, then sput- ter-coated with gold. Specimens were viewed us- ing a Hitachi S-800 scanning electron micro- scope. 176 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Diagnostic characters. — There are no univer- sal “key” diagnostic characters for species in the Spiny Leg clade. For example, the extraordinary, complex spination of the femora of the 3rd tibia is a unique and reliable character for identifying T. pilosa. Among all other species, the spination is simple, and there is almost no variation in this character. Similarly, the unique structure of the female seminal receptacles is one of the most useful characters for identifying T. polychro- mata, while in many of the other species, there is too much inter-individual variation to use these structures reliably. On the whole, at least for pre- served specimens, males have many more useful characters than females. Although the number of teeth on the cheliceral margins is not reliable, the pattern and shape of certain teeth (in partic- ular the first two distal teeth on the promargin) can be very useful. Similarly, the shape of the tip of the conductor is usually reliable. I have also found that, although scanning electron mi- croscopy gives much more detail of the conduc- tor tip, examination with a compound micro- scope is sometimes more useful for revealing subtle diagnostic features. For females, the cheliceral armature is of lim- ited usefulness. Spination of the tibia of the first leg is a very useful “cue” for both sexes, but should always be used in conjunction with an- other character. Spination pattern on the femur of the first leg is not reliable, while that on the patella and metatarsus is almost invariable. Eye patterns are very similar among species in this clade, and, where there is variability, it is not very reliable. The size of the eyes, in relation to the amount of ocular area covered, can be useful. In certain species, abdominal pattern (even in largely faded alcoholic specimens) can be diag- nostic, as can coloration of the venter and ster- num. Leg banding and coloration of the carapace are highly unreliable, as many species in the Green Spiny Leg group change the color of these, ac- cording (most likely) to habitat. Terminology. — I have used the terminology of Okuma (1987, 1988c) for the teeth on the chel- iceral margins of the males (Fig. 1): ‘Gu’ (guide tooth of upper row) is the small tubercle (may be absent or almost tooth-like) on the distal pro- margin of the chelicerae. Moving from the distal end of the chelicerae, ‘sf is the first major tooth on the promargin; ‘T’ is the second tooth, and is often much larger; ‘rsu’ refer to the remaining proximal teeth on the promargin, ‘a’ is the dorsal cheliceral spur (apophysis) for locking the fem- ale’s fang during mating. ‘AXF (auxiliary guide tooth of lower row) is the small tubercle (may be absent or almost tooth-like) on the distal retro- margin of the chelicerae. Moving from the distal end of the retromargin of the chelicerae ‘Gl’ (guide tooth of lower row) is the first major tooth, ‘L2’ the second ‘L3’ the third etc. For females, the cheliceral teeth are numbered from the distal end ‘Ur - ‘Un’ on the promargin and ‘LF - ‘L«’ on the retromargin. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SPINY LEG CLADE The major characteristics of the clade are re- lated to leg spination and predatory activity, these being the synapomorphies that unite the species in a single clade: 1) At least 4 (usually 5, some- times 6) spines on both prolateral and retrolateral sides of the 1 st tibia, and always 2 dorsal spines on tibia I (most other Hawaiian species have 3 or fewer spines on both prolateral and retrola- teral sides of the 1 st tibia). 2) Spines robust, usu- ally between 30 and 100% length of carapace (the spines on most other Hawaiian species are con- siderably less than 30% length of carapace). 3) Individuals do not build webs, either as adults or immatures (all other Hawaiian species known to date build webs). Some are very active, cur- sorial predators, while others behave as more typical sit-and-wait foragers, spending long pe- riods hanging in mid-air, legs outstretched. Natural history.- Spiders in this clade, as with almost all the endemic Hawaiian Tetragnatha, are exclusively nocturnal. They commence ac- tivity only after complete darkness (1830-2000 hours), and terminate it before dawn. The peak of activity is in the early part of the night, slowing down at around 2330. During the daytime, in- dividuals lie flat against the substrate that match- es their own color: Leaves in the case of the Green Spiny Leg group, rotten logs in the case of the Green and Red Spiny Leg group, and bark of any form in the case of T. quasimodo and T. pilosa. Because of the difficulty of beating much of the substrate with which these species are as- sociated, I have found that directly capturing in- dividuals at night is by far the most satisfactory collecting technique. The prey of this group are largely non-flying insects, such as hemipterans and lepidopteran larvae, with each species specializing on specific prey (Gillespie, in prep.). The method of capture GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 177 Figure 1. — Diagram of cheliceral margins (A, promargin; B, retromargin) of male Tetragnatha indicating terminology for teeth; from Okuma (1988c). is similar to that of other tetragnathids; Spiders bite the prey and hold it; they never wrap the prey prior to immobilization. Mating behavior has been observed in several members of this clade. The strategy is that char- acteristic of other tetragnathids (Levi 1981). There is no evidence of courtship prior to mating. On encountering each other, male and female appear to be involved in a combative interaction, both with their chelicerae and fangs outstretched. If the sexual encounter is successful, the male locks the fangs of the female against the spur (apoph- ysis) on the dorsal surface of his chelicerae. He then closes his fangs over those of the female, so as to lock the female securely in position. The cheliceral teeth themselves are not involved in this locking mechanism. Egg sacs are constructed in a manner that is basically similar to that of other tetragnathids: The ball of eggs, tightly wrapped in silk, is cov- ered over with an additional “tent” of silk, se- curely fastened to the substrate on all sides. The form of the tent, however, is characteristic of a species, often being dotted and blotched with green and/or black, laid over the white threads. Some species can even lay colored eggs (e.g., T. brevignatha lays green eggs). Distribution.— The Hawaiian islands are ar- ranged within a chronological time frame, with the northern island of Kauai the oldest at ap- proximately 5 millions years, the big island of Hawaii in the south the youngest at approxi- mately 0.4 million years (Heliker 1989). The Spiny Leg Hawaiian Tetragnatha show an inter- esting pattern of distribution among the islands, with the oldest island harboring three species endemic to that island, while the youngest has no species endemic to that island (Fig. 2). The greatest diversity of species within this clade are found on east Maui. KEY TO SPECIES IN THE SPINY LEG CLADE OF HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 1. Males 2 Females 13 2. First tooth (‘si’) in form of strong, down- curved wave, almost contiguous with erect, pointed 2nd tooth (‘T’) (Fig. 123). Abdomen widest in middle, medial distinct black in- verted triangle just below mid- ventral line T. quasimodo First tooth weaker, not down-curved. Ab- domen with no medial inverted triangle 3 178 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 2. — Map of Ihe Hawaiian Islands, showing distribution of species in the Spiny Leg clade of Hawaiian Tetragnatha (omitting T. quasimodo, which occurs on all islands shown except Kauai). Broken lines indicate latitude and longitude. The perimeters of the major volcanic masses are outlined with marks converging towards the summits of the volcanoes. 3. Femur of 3rd leg with at least 5 (up to 1 1) strong, long ventral spines, more than 2x width of femur (Fig. 1 14). Chelicerae short (approx. 60% length of carapace); dorsal spur short (approx. 9% length of carapace) (Figs. 1 09 and 111) T. pilosa Femur of 3rd leg with no more than 3 rather short (rarely more than width of femur) ven- tral spines 4 4. Second tooth ‘T’ pointing rather sharply and directly (not curved) upwards, away from ‘rsuF and towards ‘sF (Fig. 137) . . . T. restricta ‘T’ not pointing directly upwards from mar- gin of chelicerae 5 5. Chelicerae long, > 80% length of carapace (Fig. 55) 6 Chelicerae < 70% length of carapace (Fig. 29) 1 1 6. Apical projection of palpal conductor cap straight, pointed and rather long (Figs. 22 and 1 54) T. polychromata Apical projection of conductor cap curled ... 7 7. Conductor cap much higher than wide, apical projection curled mostly laterally, tip pointed (Figs. 48 and 157) T. macracantha Conductor cap wider than high, apical pro- jection curled mostly forward 8 8. Apical projection from conductor cap ap- proximately as long as cap itself, pointing out laterally in broad curl (Fig. 6 1 ). Cap uniform- ly domed (Fig. 158). Dorsal spur on chelic- erae without any bifurcation (Fig. 57) T. waikamoi Apical projection from conductor cap absent or much shorter than cap itself 9 9. Backward projection of conductor cap well below floor of cap itself, giving it appearance of legionnaire hat (Figs. 87, 159 and 160) T. kamakou Backward projection of conductor cap at ap- proximately same level as floor of cap itself 10 10. Conductor cap clearly divided into two sec- tions by high ridge leading up from dorsal side of stem (Figs. 9 and 153). Apical tip pointed T. tantalus Conductor cap with indistinct, low ridge di- viding two sections (Figs. 74 and 161). Apical tip blunt T. kauaiensis 11. Dorsal cheliceral spur long (18% carapace) (Fig. 147). Promargin of chelicerae: Distance from distal margin to ‘sF>> distance from ‘sF to ‘T’ (Fig. 1 45). Tibia I with 4 retrolateral and 4 (or 3) prolateral spines (Fig. 149) . . . T. mohihi Dorsal cheliceral spur short (8-10% cara- pace). Promargin of chelicerae: Distance from distal margin to ‘sF not much more (<1.5 x) than distance from ‘sF to ‘T’. Tibia I with 4 (or 6) retrolateral and 4 (or 6) prolateral spines 1 2. Tibia I: 4 retrolateral, 4 prolateral spines (Fig. GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 99). Legs distinctly banded, carapace and ab- domen dark T. perreimi Tibia I: 6 retrolateral, 6 prolateral spines (Fig. 33). Legs without banding, carapace and ab- domen virtually unpigmented (bright green in life) T. brevignatha 13. Femur III with numerous (8-10) long ventral spines (Fig. 1 20) T. pilosa Femur with no more than 2 ventral spines 14 14. Abdomen distinctly pyriform. Wide part along medial line raised up into a flat medial ridge (no lateral or dorso-lateral humps) T. restricta Abdomen not distinctly pyriform (diamond- shaped or oval) 15 15. Abdomen diamond-shaped with sub-medial distinct, small black inverted triangle, usually drawn up into short, finger-like tubercle (Fig. 135). Sternum dark/dusky. Venter with V-shaped bar down center. Color pattern consists of various combinations of black, brown and grey. Legs dark and distinctly banded. Spider quite large (5. 3-8.8 mm) . , T. quasimodo Abdomen without sub-medial, black tuber- culate triangle. Sternum pale/ translucent. Venter without V-shaped bar down center. Color pattern usually green to green/red .... 16 1 6. Abdomen diamond shaped, exaggerated dor- so-laterally into 2 lateral, rounded humps. Color pattern various combinations of red (on lateral humps) and dark green. Sternum pale, venter uniformly colored. Legs dark, distinctly banded 17 Abdomen elongate oval. Color bright green in life, fading to pale yellow in alcohol (some species capable of becoming darker according to habitat). Legs usually pale 18 17. Chelicerae short, 52-56% length of carapace (Fig. 102). Spider quite small (carapace 2.2- 2.4 mm). Promargin of chelicerae: Distance between 1st and 2nd tooth 8-10% cheliceral length. Leg spines relatively short (28-36% length of carapace) (Figs. 105 and 106) .... T. perreirai Chelicerae 67-69% length of carapace (Fig. 88), carapace 2. 4-2. 8 mm. Promargin of che- licerae: Distance between 1st and 2nd tooth 20-30% cheliceral length. Leg spines rela- tively long (45-60% length of carapace) . . . T. kamakou 1 8. Median lobe of seminal receptacles very large, enveloping both dorsal and ventral bulbs (Fig. 28) T. polychromata Median lobe of seminal receptacles smal- ler, never enveloping either dorsal or ventral bulbs 19 19. First tooth on retromargin of chelicerae ‘LT larger than ‘L2’ (Fig. 37). Number of teeth 179 on promargin > number on retromargin. Venter uniformly colored (particularly no- ticeable in life). Chelicerae short (50-55% length of carapace) T. brevignatha First tooth on retromargin of chelicerae ‘LT smaller than ‘L2’. Number of teeth on pro- margin < number on retromargin. Venter with distinct, narrow, median bar 20 20. Tibia I with 6 retrolateral and 6 (or 5) pro- lateral spines 21 Tibia I with 5 retrolateral and 5 (or 4) pro- lateral spines 22 21. Leg spines (length approx. 2.5 mm) equal to or longer than carapace. Chelicerae long (60- 75% length of carapace) (Fig. 52) T. macracantha Leg spines (length approx. 1.5 mm) consid- erably shorter than carapace. Chelicerae shorter (55-65% length of carapace) (Fig. 1 3) T. tantalus 22. Teeth on retromargin of chelicerae contigu- ous, those on promargin nearly so (Figs. 75 and 76). Lateral eyes slightly separated from each other (Fig. 77) T. kauaiensis Teeth on retromargin of chelicerae well sep- arated, as are those on promargin (Figs. 62 and 63). Lateral eyes contiguous (Fig. 64) T. waikamoi GREEN SPINY LEG GROUP Characteristics. There are six species in this group. Each of these has an elongate/oval ab- domen, generally iridescent green with variable red patterns superimposed. The legs are usually rather pale and unbanded. The eyes are generally small. The leg spines are long (44-105% length of carapace). There are six species in this group: T. tantalus, T. polychromata, T. brevignatha, T. macracantha, T. waikamoi and T. kauaiensis. Tetragnatha tantalus, new species (Figs. 3-15 and 153) Types. — Holotype male, allotype female from Mount Tantalus, 1400 ft (427 m), Oahu Island (25 October 1989), (coll. R.G. Gillespie and W.D. Perreira), deposited in the Bishop Museum, Ho- nolulu. Etymology.— The specific epithet, regarded as a noun in apposition, refers to the type locality of the species, Mount Tantalus on the south- eastern end of the Koolaus of Oahu. Diagnosis. — r. tantalus is most easily con- fused with T. polychromata. Males are distin- guished as follows: (1) The distinctive conductor Figures 3-\5. — Tetragnatha tantalus\ Male holotype. 3) Promargin of right chelicera; 4) Retromargin of left chelicera; 5) Dorsal spur of chelicera, lateral view; 6) carapace, dorsal; 7) Right leg I, dorsal; 8) Right leg III, prolateral; 9) Left palpus, prolateral. Female allotype. 10) Promargin of right chelicera; 1 1) Retromargin of left chelicera; 12) Carapace, dorsal; 13) Right leg I, dorsal; 14) Right leg III, prolateral; 15) Seminal receptacles, ventral. Scale bar (mm) at Fig. 12 applies to Figs. 3-6 and 10-12; at Fig. 8 to Figs. 7, 8 and 13, 14. [Figs. 9 and 153] with the short apical projection curling forward readily distinguishes it from all others in the Green Spiny Leg group. (2) Tibia I with 6 retrolateral, 2 dorsal, 6 [or 5] prolateral spines [in T. polychromata tibia I has 5 retro- lateral, 2 dorsal, 5 prolateral spines]; compare Figs. 1 3 and 26. (3) First tooth on the male che- licerae [‘si’] thicker than second [‘T’] and bent GILLESPIE-HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 181 up towards the top of the chelicerae [in T. po- lychromata ‘sF is thinner than ‘T’, and projects straight out]; compare Figs. 3 and 16. (4) Apical tooth ‘Gu’ pronounced [in T. polychromata it is small/absent]; compare Figs. 3 and 16. (5) Tip of dorsal spur variably bifurcated or pointed [in T. polychromata it is very pointed dorsally, slop- ing sharply back ventrally]; compare Figs. 5 and 18. Description. =//otovP^ male: i¥\g%. 3-9). Pro- margin of chelicerae (Fig. 3): Distance between ‘Gu’ ‘sF and ‘T’ approximately equal, ratio of distal end to ‘sF: ‘sF to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsuF 5:3:3 (2). ‘Gu’ pronounced, small and wide, flat-topped tubercle; ‘sF robust, wide-based cone, pointed up towards distal margin of chelicerae; much wider than ‘T’, by 1 50% (100-155%), but shorter, 64% height (51-78%). ‘T’ tall, thin, straight, dagger- shaped. ‘rsu’ 4 (up to 7) straight spikes. Retro- margin of chelicerae (Fig. 4): Total of 8 (up to 10) teeth. ‘AXF tiny notch; ‘GF and ‘L2’ strong, stronger than rest of teeth on retromargin of che- licerae. Dorsal spur long, shaped like slim, bent finger (11.9% length of carapace); tip variably bifurcated or pointed (Fig. 5). Cheliceral fang slightly shorter than base, bent sharply over at both proximal and distal ends. Length of ceph- alothorax 1.9 mm (1.8-2. 2), total length 5.7 mm (Fig. 6). Chelicerae slightly shorter (93%) than length of carapace. Depression of thoracic fovea indistinctly marked with broken semicircle on prolateral margin. Leg spination similar to fe- male, but spines shorter (Figs. 7-8). Femur I: 7 (6-8) prolateral, 2 dorsal, 7 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 5 (6) prolateral, 2 dorsal, 6 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III, no ventral spines. Tibia III, 2 pairs of ventral spines and 2 single spines. Coloration and eye pattern as in female. Conductor Tip (Figs. 9 and 153): Conductor cap clearly divided by high ridge leading up from dorsal side of stem. Apical projection rather short and curled forward. Allotype female: (Figs. 10-15). PME separated by approximately width of PME. Median ocular area considerably wider posteriorly (Fig. 12). Lateral eyes contiguous. Cheliceral margins: Pro- margin (Fig. 10): series of 8 teeth ‘UT very ro- bust, considerably wider but shorter (79%, 75- 85%) and well separated from (20%, 15-25%, cheliceral length) ‘U2’ and ‘U3’. ‘U2’ and ‘U3’ of similar height, ‘U4’-’U8’ decreasing in size proximally. Retromargin (Fig. 1 1): series of 9 teeth, ‘LI’ similar in height to ‘Ul’ and ‘L2’, slightly separated from ‘L2’ and decreasing in size proximally. Cheliceral fang quite long (ap- proximately 90% length of base), tapering to smooth point distally. Length of cephalothorax 2.1 mm (2.0-2. 5), total length 5.4 mm (4. 8-5. 8). Cheliceiae shorter, 60% (55-65%) length of car- apace. Legs unbanded, spines very distinct, but considerably shorter (73%) than length of cara- pace (Figs. 13, 14). Femur I: 8 (6-8) prolateral, 3 dorsal, 5 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 6 (5) pro- lateral, 2 dorsal, 6 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 2 ventral spines. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines and 2 single spines. Carapace pale yellow (bright green in life) with indistinct fovea marked by broken semicircle on prolateral mar- gin. Sternum very pale yellow. Dorsum of ab- domen uniformly pale yellow (bright green in life), mostly plain, but sometimes with patches of red (see color polymorphism below). Venter pale whitish with distinct darker narrow band running down midline. Seminal receptacles (Fig. 1 5): Two bulbs linked together in opposing “comma” shapes, each with rather heavily sclerotized medial border. Neither bulb greatly dilated at tip, and central portion similar in width to bulbs. Median lobe smooth doughnut shape that fits well within area defined by outer limits of bulbs. Color polymorphism. — Similar coloration and its associated polymorphism are found in all the currently known species of the Green Spiny Leg group, T. tantalus, T. brevignatha, T. polychro- mata, T. macracantha, T. waikamoi and T. kauaiensis. All of these are bright lime green in life, although all can exhibit color polymor- phism, the most common polymorphism being the presence of red patches on the dorsum of the abdomen. These usually take the form of one or series of red heart shapes. All species (except, perhaps, T. tantalus, T. brevignatha and T. ma- cracantha) are also capable of becoming much more darkly pigmented, possibly due to envi- ronmental conditions. This is particularly evi- dent in T. polychromata and T. kauaiensis, both of which can incorporate dark pigment (“melan- ic” form), so gaining heavily banded legs, and the dorsum of the abdomen becoming dark, mot- tled green. However, the distinctive patterns characteristic of species in the Green Spiny Leg group are never similar to species outside this group. Material Examined. — This species is found in wet- 182 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1.— Numbers of specimens collected at different sites (islands, volcanoes and elevations) through the Hawaiian Islands. Island Hawaii (Mountain Volcano Mauna Loa Saddle) Mauna Kea Kohala South West West East East East East Elevation (m X 1000) 1-2 1-2 0-1 1-2 0-1 1-2 0-1 1-2 0-1 1-2 T. tantalus Male Fern Imm T. polychromata Male Fern Imm T. hrevignatha Male Fern Imm T. macracantha Male Fern Imm T. waikamoi Male Fern Imm T. kauaiensis Male Fern Imm T. kamakou Male Fern Imm 4 3 1 3 3 2 2 7 8 3 4 7 5 2 4 11 1 T. perreirai Male Fern Imm T. pilosa Male Fern Imm T. quasimodo Male 16 37 Fern 19 50 Imm 58 62 T. restricta Male 1 Fern Imm 13 3 15 2 23 12 17 10 5 53 6 24 10 17 3 9 34 16 44 5 22 5 1 3 3 1 T. mohihi Male Fern Imm mesic forest, only on Oahu Island, Koolau Mountains (Table 1): Mount Tantalus, 1400 ft (427 m), 25-X-89 (R.G. Gillespie & W.D. Ferreira); Schofield-Waikane, 1910 ft (582 m), 30-IX-89 (R.G. Gillespie). Tetragnatha polychromata, new species (Figs. 16-28 and 154) Types. — Holotype male from Peacock Flats, Waianae Mountains, 1800 ft (550 m), Oahu Is- land (18 August 1988) (coll. R.G. Gillespie and C. Parrish), allotype female from Mount Kaala. 4000 ft (1220 m), Oahu Island (29 April 1990) (coll. (R.G. Gillespie), deposited in the Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Etymology. — Poly (Greek) many; chromata (Greek) colors. The specific epithet is an adjec- GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 183 Table L— Continued. Hawaii Maui Molo- kai Lanai Oahu Kauai Hua- lalai W. Maui Haleakala Kam- akou Lanai- hale Wainaes Koo- laus Waia- leale 1-2 1-2 North 1-2 North East East 0-1 0-1 1-2 West 1-2 1-2 1-2 1-2 0-1 0-1 1-2 4 6 6 2 5 7 15 12 8 1 9 6 35 8 47 2 22 5 4 21 4 13 76 40 1 2 3 4 2 1 13 2 8 10 20 1 11 1 26 13 62 1 15 3 23 16 38 2 1 6 2 2 15 4 1 18 15 36 3 6 3 4 3 51 6 16 14 3 52 1 32 1 1 6 37 8 3 1 3 1 3 11 6 10 96 102 95 14 13 26 3 7 live referring to the presence of variable amounts of red (if any) found on this vivid green species, in addition to its ability to change color from plain to melanic forms. Diagnosis. — The distinctive conductor, which lacks any form of curled tip or apical projection, readily distinguishes T. polychromata from all others in the Green Spiny Leg group (Fig. 1 54). T. polychromata is most easily confused with T. tantalus. These species can be distinguished as mentioned above. Description.— //o/orypc male: (Fig. 16-22). Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 16): Distance be- tween ‘Gu’ ‘sF and ‘T’ approximately equal, ratio of distal end to ‘sF: ‘sF to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsuF 4:3:3 (occasionally ‘sF may be little closer to ‘T’). ‘Gu’ 1 84 the journal OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures l6-2i. — Tetragnatha polychromata; Male holotype. 16) Promargin of right chelicera; 1 7) Retromargin of left chelicera; 18) Dorsal spur of chelicera, lateral view; 19) carapace, dorsal; 20) Right leg I, dorsal; 21) Right leg in, prolateral; 22) Left palpus, prolateral. Female allotype. 23) Promargin of right chelicera; 24) Retromargin of left chelicera; 25) Carapace, dorsal; 26) Right leg I, dorsal; 27) Right leg III, prolateral; 28) Seminal receptacles, ventral. Scale bar (mm) at Fig. 19 applies to Figs. 16-19; at Fig. 25 to Figs. 23-25; at Fig. 21 to Figs. 20-21; at Fig. 27 to Figs. 26, 27. small, often discernible only by hairs; ‘si’ tall, straight, narrow cone, pointed up perpendicular to margin of chelicerae. Much narrower than ‘T’, by 63% (50-65%), and shorter, 50% height (36- 53%). ‘T’ tall, thin, straight, dagger-shaped, ‘rsu’ 7 (5-7) straight spikes. Retromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 17): Total of 1 1 teeth. ‘AXl’ tiny ill-defined bump; ‘Gl’ and ‘L2’ strong, much stronger than GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 185 rest of teeth on retromargin. Dorsal spur long { 1 6.1% length of carapace, 1 5.5-20.0%), like slim, bent finger, but with very pointed tip on dorsal margin, sloping sharply back to ventral margin (Fig. 18). Cheliceral fang slightly shorter than base, bent sharply at both proximal and distal ends. Length of cephalothorax 2.3 mm (1.3-2. 4), total length 6.1 mm (Fig. 19). Chelicerae slightly shorter (90%, 90-93%) than length of carapace. Depression of thoracic fovea indistinctly marked with broken semicircle on prolateral margin. Leg spination similar to female, but spines shorter (Figs. 20-21). Femur I: 9 prolateral, 3 dorsal, 5 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 5 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 5 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 1 ven- tral spine. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Coloration and eye pattern as in female. Conductor Tip (Figs. 22 and 154): Angular, flat-topped cap, terminating in smooth, straight point without any form of curled apical projec- tion. Allotype female: (Figs. 23-28). PME separated by just over width of PME (Fig. 25). Median ocular area slightly wider posteriorly. Lateral eyes contiguous. Cheliceral margins: Promargin (Fig. 23): series of 8 (7) teeth, ‘Ul’ slightly wider and shorter (64%, 60-93%) than ‘U2’ and ‘U3’, and well separated from them by 20% ( 1 8-26%) chel- iceral length. ‘U2’ and ‘U3’ of similar height, ‘U4’-end decreasing in size proximally. Retro- margin (Fig. 24): series of 1 1 teeth, ‘LI’ similar in height to ‘Ul’, but smaller than ‘L2’ (56%); teeth decrease in size proximally. Cheliceral fang moderate (85% length of base), tapering to smooth point at distal end. Length of cephalothorax 2.3 mm (2. 2-2.4), total length 6.4 mm (5. 5-6. 5). Chelicerae 65% (60-70%) length of carapace. Legs slightly banded, spines medium length, 75% length of carapace (Figs. 26-27). Femur I: 7 pro- lateral, 3 dorsal, 5 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 5 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 5 retrolateral spines. Meta- tarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 1 ventral spine. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Carapace pale yellow (bright green in life) with indistinct fovea marked by broken semicircle around lateral margin. Sternum very pale yellow. Dorsum of abdomen uniformly pale yellow, although in life bright green, mostly plain, but sometimes with patches of red (see color polymorphism under T. tantalus). Venter pale whitish with distinct darker narrow band run- ning down midline. Seminal receptacles (Fig. 28): Two bulbs linked together in opposing “comma” shapes, each with relatively heavily sclerotized medial border. Nei- ther bulb greatly dilated at tip, and central por- tion similar in width to bulbs. Median lobe: large balloon, covering area much greater than that defined by outer limits of bulbs. Color polymorphism.— -See T. tantalus above. Material Examined.- This species is found in wet- mesic forest only on Oahu Island, Waianae Mountains (Table 1); Waianae Kai, Waianae Mountains, 1900 ft (580 m) 25-VI-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Pea- cock Flats, 1 800 ft (550 m), 1 8-Vni-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Summit of Mount Kaala, 4000 ft (1220 m) 29-IV-90 (R.G. Gillespie). Tetmgnatha brevignatha, new species (Figs. 29-41 and 155, 156) Types. — Holotype male from Kaloko Road, Hualalai, 3600 ft (1097 m), Hawaii Island (18 June 1989) (coll. R.G. Gillespie and C. Parrish), allotype female from Hualalai, 3600 ft (1097 m), Hawaii Island (30 July 1 988) (coll. R.G. Gillespie and C. Parrish), deposited in the Bishop Muse- um, Honolulu. Etymology. — Brevis (Latin) short; gnathos (Greek) jaw. The specific epithet is an adjective referring to the short chelicerae of this species as compared to others in the Green Spiny Leg group. Diagnosis. — r. brevignatha is rarely confused with other species, despite the fact that it and T. waikamoi are the only species in the Green Spiny Leg group known to date to have overlapping ranges. The distinctive features that separate T. brevignatha from all other species include: (1) Short chelicerae [particularly so in males]; (2) Venter uniformly colored, without a darker nar- row band running down the midline. These char- acters readily distinguish the species from T. wai- kamoi and T. macracantha. The presence of a small apical projection to the conductor cap readily distinguishes it from T. polychromata and T. tantalus. The most similar species in many respects is T. kauaiensis. This species, however, exhibits fundamental differences in cheliceral ar- mature and leg spination. Description.— //o/o/ype male: (Figs. 29-35). Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 29): Distance be- tween ‘Gu’ ‘si’ and ‘T’ approximately equal, ratio of distal end to ‘sP: ‘sF to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsul’ 4:3:3 (Note: applies to populations on Mauna Loa; those from Maui and Mauna Kea appear to have larger distance between ‘sF and ‘T’). ‘Gu’ absent; ‘sF well-developed, straight cone, pointed up per- pendicular to margin of chelicerae; similar in 186 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 29-4\. — Tetragnatha brevignatha\ Male holotype. 29) Promargin of right chelicera; 30) Retromargin of left chelicera; 31) Dorsal spur of chelicera, lateral view; 32) carapace, dorsal; 33) Right leg I, dorsal; 34) Right leg III, prolateral; 35) Left palpus, prolateral. Female allotype. 36) Promargin of right chelicera; 37) Retromargin of left chelicera; 38) Carapace, dorsal; 39) Right leg I, dorsal; 40) Right leg III, prolateral; 4 1) Seminal receptacles, ventral. Scale bar (mm) at Fig. 32 applies to Figs. 29-32; at Fig. 38 to Figs. 36-38; at Fig. 34 to Figs. 33-34; at Fig. 40 to Figs. 39, 40. GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 187 width (87%, 75-100%) to T’, and only slightly shorter, 71% height (this varies, 44-78%). ‘T’ tall, thin, straight, dagger-shaped (sometimes slightly bent up towards distal end of chelicerae). ‘rsu’ 5 (4-5) straight spikes. Retromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 30): Total of 7 (6-8) teeth. ‘AXF absent; ‘Gr only very strong tooth, much stronger than rest of teeth on retromargin. Dorsal spur short (9.0% length of carapace, 6. 0-9. 9%), shaped like fat, almost straight finger; tip pointed but not sharply so (Fig. 31). Cheliceral fang distinctly shorter than base, rather gently curved at both proximal and distal ends. Length of cephalotho- rax 2.2 mm (2. 0-2. 2), total length 5.8 mm (5.6- 6.0) (Fig. 32). Chelicerae much shorter (61%, 58- 64%) than length of carapace. Depression of tho- racic fovea faint horseshoe-shape, with similarly faint medial line running up from its anterior margin. Leg spination similar to female, but spines shorter (Figs. 33-34). Femur I: 7 prola- teral, 3 dorsal, 7 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 6 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 6 retrolateral spines. Meta- tarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 2 ventral spines. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Coloration and eye pattern as in female. Conductor Tip (Figs. 35 and 155): Smoothly rounded cap, terminating in small apical projec- tion that curls forwards. Allotype female: (Figs. 36-41). PME separated by approximately width of PME (Fig. 38). Me- dian ocular area slightly wider posteriorly. Lat- eral eyes contiguous (in representatives from Ha- waii; usually - not always - well separated in species from Maui). Cheliceral margins: Pro- margin (Fig. 36): series of 8 (9) teeth ‘UF slightly wider and shorter by 83% (60-100%) than ‘U2’ and ‘U3’, and separated from them by only 14% (10-15%) cheliceral length. ‘U2’ and ‘U3’ of sim- ilar height, with '■U4’-end decreasing in size prox- imally. Retromargin (Fig. 37): series of 8 (7-9) teeth, LI considerably larger (109% height, 105- 125%) than ‘L2’ and 70% height of ‘UF (range 70-140%); teeth decreasing in size proximally. Cheliceral fang moderate (85% length of base), tapering to smooth point at distal end. Length of cephalothorax 2.2 mm (2. 0-2. 6), total length 5.2 mm (4. 5-5. 5). Chelicerae short, 53% (50- 55%) length of carapace. Legs unbanded, spines medium length, 76% (70-80 %) length of cara- pace (Figs. 39-40). Femur I; 8 prolateral, 2 dor- sal, 7 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 6 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 6 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 pro- lateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 2 ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 pair of ventral spines and 3 single spines. Carapace pale yellow (bright green in life), depression of fovea unmarked. Sternum very pale yellow. Dorsum of abdomen uniformly pale yellow (bright green in life), most- ly plain, but sometimes with patches of red (see color polymorphism under T. tantalus). Venter uniformly colored (particularly noticeable in life), abdomen translucent green. Seminal receptacles (Fig. 41): Two bulbs linked together in opposing “C” shapes, each with rel- atively heavily sclerotized medial border. Both bulbs, in particular dorsal bulb, expanded at tips, with constriction joining each to central portion. Central portion similar in width to lower bulb, with dorsal bulb wider than both. Median lobe fits well within confines of upper and lower bulbs. Color polymorphism. — See T. tantalus above. Interisland Variation. — It is questionable whether representatives from Maui and Hawaii should be placed in different species. In deciding to treat them as a single species, I took into ac- count two factors: (1) only major difference be- tween the islands is in separation of lateral eyes, but this is not entirely consistent, and so unre- liable [representatives on Maui tend to have well- separated lateral eyes, whereas lateral eyes of those on Maui are contiguous; but I have found one individual on Maui with contiguous lateral eyes]. (2) Individuals from Mauna Kea on Hawaii are more similar to those on Maui than they are to others on Hawaii. In particular, the cap of the conductor tip is broader in both of these popu- lations (Fig. 1 56), than in other populations (Fig. 155). My suggestion is that the Maui population was recently colonized by a representative(s) from Mauna Kea. If this were true, it might also ex- plain why T. brevignatha is the only member of the Green Spiny Leg group to overlap with an- other in the same group. Material Examined.— This species is found in mesic forest on Maui Island, wet-mesic on Hawaii Island (Table 1): Hawaii Island, Puu Makaaia, Stainback Highway, 4000 ft (1220 m), 14 and 21-X-90 (R.G. Gillespie, D.J. Preston & 1. Felger) and 1 7-III-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J.I.M. Gillespie); Laupahoehoe, 4120 ft ( 1 257 m) and 3200 ft (976 m), 1 9-X-90 (R.G. Gillespie, D.J. Preston & J. Burgett); Laupahoehoe, 42 10 ft ( 1 284 m) and 4020 ft (1225 m), 13-III-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J.I.M. Gillespie). Maui Island: East Maui, Waikamoi, 4400 ft ( 1 340 m), 8-VI-88 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Med- eiros) and 8-II-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J. Burgett). 188 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Tetragnatha macracantha, new species (Figs. 42-54 and 157) Types. — Holotype male from Kipahulu Val- ley, 4000 ft ( 1 220 m), Maui Island ( 1 5 May 1 990) (coll. R.G. Gillespie and A.C. Medeiros), allo- type female from Hanawi, 1500 ft, Maui Island (11 May 1990) (coll. R.G. Gillespie, R. Rydell and J. Burgett), deposited in the Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Etymology. — Makros (Greek) long; akantha (Greek) spine. The specific epithet is an adjective referring to the extraordinarily long spines on the legs of this species, in particular the mature fe- males, where the tibial spines are often as long or longer than the carapace. Diagnosis. — r. macracantha is most easily confused with T. waikamoi, as both these species are found on East Maui. Males can be distin- guished as follows: (1) Tibia I with 6 retrolateral, 2 dorsal, 6 prolateral spines [in T. waikamoi tibia I has 5 retrolateral, 2 dorsal, 5 prolateral spines]. (2) ‘si’ placed far down chelicerae, ratio of distal end to ‘si’: ‘si’ to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsul’ 5:2:3 [in T. waikamoi this ratio is 4:3:3, 4:3:4 or 3:3:4]. (3) Apical tooth ‘Gu’ is absent [in T. waikamoi it is pronounced]. (4) Conductor has a small apical projection that curls forwards (Fig. 157) [in T. waikamoi apical projection is very long and drawn laterally outwards, terminating in a small for- ward curl. Fig. 158]. These features also distin- guish the species from others in the Green Spiny Leg group. Description.— male: (Figs. 42-48). Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 42): Distance be- tween distal end and ‘si’ approximately equal to distance between ‘si’ and ‘rsul’, ratio of distal end to ‘si’: ‘si’ to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsul’ 5:2:3. ‘Gu’ absent; ‘si’ small peg, smaller than ‘T’ in width (90%, 48-90%), much smaller in height (28%, 20-30%). ‘T’ tall, thin, dagger-shaped, very slightly bent up towards distal end. ‘rsu’ 7 (5-7) straight spikes. Retromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 43) : Total of 9 (8-10) teeth. ‘AXl’ absent; ‘Gl’ and ‘L2’ only slightly stronger than rest of teeth on retromargin. Dorsal spur long (19.4% length of carapace, 16.6-18.2%), shaped like slender, bent finger, ending in distinctly blunt tip (Fig. 44) . Cheliceral fang almost same length as base, abruptly curved at both proximal and distal ends. Length of cephalothorax 2.0 mm (2.0-2. 2), total length 5.1 mm (5.0- 5.5) (Fig. 45). Chelicerae very slightly shorter (95%, 94-98%) than length of carapace. Depression of thoracic fovea indis- tinctly marked with pair of semicircles on lateral margins, and with faint medial line running up from its anterior margin. Leg spination similar to female, but spines shorter (Figs. 46-47). Fe- mur I: 7 prolateral, 3 dorsal, 5 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 6 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 6 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I; 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 3 ventral spines. Tibia III; 1 pair of ventral spines and 3 single spines. Col- oration and eye pattern as in female. Conductor Tip (Fig. 48 and 157): Smoothly rounded, very high-peaked cap, terminating in small apical projection that curls forwards. Allotype female: (Figs. 49-54). Eyes small, PME separated by considerably more than width of PME (Fig. 51). Median ocular area wider pos- teriorly. Lateral eyes contiguous. Cheliceral mar- gins: Promargin (Fig. 49): series of 7 teeth ‘Ul’ smaller and shorter (45% height, 45-65%) than ‘U2’ and ‘U3’, and separated from them by 21% (20-40%) cheliceral length. ‘U2’ and ‘U3’ of sim- ilar height, with ‘U4’-‘U7’ decreasing in size proximally. Retromargin (Fig. 50): series of 9 teeth, LI smaller (73% height, 70-95%) than ‘L2’ and same height as ‘Ul’ (range 70-140% height); teeth decreasing in size proximally. Cheliceral fang moderate (82% length of base), tapering to smooth point at distal end. Length of cephalo- thorax 2.5 mm (2.0-2. 8), total length 5.5 mm (5. 0-6.0). Chelicerae long, 61% (60-75%) length of carapace. Legs unbanded, spines very long, equal to or longer than length of carapace (Figs. 52-53). Femur I: 9 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 6 retro- lateral spines. Tibia I: 6 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 6 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 3 ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 pair of ventral spines and 5 single spines. Carapace pale yellow (bright green in life) with indistinct fovea marked with broken semicircle around lateral margin. Sternum very pale yellow. Dorsum of abdomen pale yellow in alcohol, green in life, often with patches of red (see color polymorphism under T. tantalus). Venter pale white with distinct darker narrow band running down midline. Seminal receptacles (Fig. 54): Two bulbs linked ; together in curl, so that upper bulbs run parallel I to each other at midline, then make 90° turn to connect to lower bulb. Neither bulb shows scle- rotization except along margin where they con- nect to each other. Both bulbs very slightly di- lated, central portion forming narrow neck, median lobe ill-defined. Color polymorphism. — See T. tantalus above. GILLESPIE-HAWAIIAN TETILAGNATHA 189 Figures 42-54. — Tetragnat ha macracantha\ Male holotype. 42) Promargin of right chelicera; 43) Retromargin of left chelicera; 44) Dorsal spur of chelicera, lateral view; 45) carapace, dorsal; 46) Right leg I, dorsal; 47) Right leg III, prolateral; 48) Left palpus, prolateral. Female allotype. 49) Promargin of right chelicera; 50) Retromargin of left chelicera; 5 1) Carapace, dorsal; 52) Right leg I, dorsal; 53) Right leg III, prolateral; 54) Seminal receptacles, ventral. Scale bar (mm) at Fig. 45 applies to Figs. 42-45; at Fig. 51 to Figs. 49-51; at Fig. 47 to Figs. 46-47; at Fig. 53 to Figs. 52-53. Material Examined. — This species is found in wet forest only on Maui Island (Table 1): Kipahulu Valley, 2000 ft (610 m), lO-VI-89 (A.C. Medeiros) and 17-V- 90 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros); 3000 ft (9 1 4 m). 16-V-90 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros); 4000 ft (1220 m). 1-V1-89(A.C. Medeiros) and 15-V-90(R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros); 5000 ft (1524 m), 14-V- 90 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros); 6500 ft (1980 1 90 the journal of arachnology Figures 55-61 . — Tetragnat ha waikamoh Male holotype. 55) Promargin of right chelicera; 56) Retromargin of left chelicera; 57) Dorsal spur of chelicera, lateral view; 58) carapace, dorsal; 59) Right leg I, dorsal; 60) Right leg III, prolateral; 61) Left palpus, prolateral. Female allotype. 62) Promargin of right chelicera; 63) Retromargin of left chelicera; 64) Carapace, dorsal; 65) Right leg I, dorsal; 66) Right leg III, prolateral; 67) Seminal receptacles, ventral. Scale bar (mm) at Fig. 58 applies to Figs. 55-58; at Fig. 64 to Figs. 62-64; at Fig. 60 to Figs. 59, 60; at Fig. 66 to Figs. 65, 66. GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 191 m), 27-IV-88 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros). Han- awi Valley, 1520 ft (463 m), 9-II-90 (R.G. Gillespie & R. Rydell) and 1 l-V-90 (R.G. Gillespie, R. Rydell & J. Burgett). Tetragnatha waikamoi, new species (Figs. 55-67 and 158) Types. --Holotype male from Carruthers Camp, Waikamoi, 61 50 ft (1876 m), Maui Island (29 May 1988) (coll. R.G. Gillespie and C. Par- rish), allotype female from Olinda, Waikamoi, 4460 ft (1360 m), Maui Island (15 July 1988) (coll. R.G. Gillespie), deposited in the Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Etymology.— The specific epithet, regarded as a noun in apposition, refers to the type locality of the species, the Nature Conservancy of Ha- waii’s Waikamoi Preserve on East Maui. Diagnosis. — r. waikamoi is most easily con- fused with T. macracantha. These species can be distinguished as mentioned above. The distinc- tive conductor, with its very long apical projec- tion drawn laterally outwards and terminating in a small forward curl (Fig. 158) readily distin- guishes T. waikamoi from all others in the Green Spiny Leg group. Description.— //o/otype male: (Figs. 55-61). Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 55): Distance be- tween ‘Gu’ ‘si’ and ‘T’ approximately equal, ratio of distal end to ‘si’: ‘si’ to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsuF 4:3:3 (sometimes 4:3:4 or 3:3:4). ‘Gu’ present, large, well-developed cone; ‘si’ medium-sized cone, much smaller than ‘T’ in width (67%, 46-72%) and in height (40%, 33-40%). ‘T’ very robust, tall and straight, ‘rsu’ 5 (5-6) straight spikes. Re- tromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 56): Total of 10 (9- 11) teeth. ‘AXr present and distinct; ‘Gl’ and ‘L2’ considerably stronger than rest of teeth on retromargin. Dorsal spur long (18.3% length of carapace, 18.1-18.5%), shaped like slender, bent finger, ending in slightly rounded tip (Fig. 57). Cheliceral fang distinctly shorter than base. Length of cephalothorax 2.5 mm (2. 4-2. 8), total length 6.1 mm (6. 0-7.0) (Fig. 58). Chelicerae al- most same length (96%, 95-101%) as length of carapace. Depression of thoracic fovea indis- tinctly marked with pair of semicircles on pro- lateral margins. Leg spination similar to female, but spines shorter (Figs. 59-60). Femur I: 8 pro- lateral, 3 dorsal, 4 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 5 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 5 retrolateral spines. Meta- tarsus 1: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 1 ventral spine. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Coloration and eye pattern as in female. Conductor Tip (Figs. 61 and 158): Low, an- gular cap leading to very long apical projection drawn laterally outwards and terminating in small forward curl. Allotype female', (Figs. 62-67). Eyes small, PME separated by just more than half width of PME (Fig. 64). Median ocular area narrower posteri- orly. Lateral eyes contiguous. Cheliceral margins: Promargin (Fig. 62): series of 8 teeth ‘Ul’ wider but shorter (70%) than ‘U2’ and ‘U3’, separated from them by 10% (8-25%) cheliceral length. ‘U2’ and ‘U3’ of similar height, with ‘U4’-’U7’ decreasing in size proximally. Retromargin (Fig. 63): series of 9 teeth, ‘LF similar in height to both ‘L2’ (87%, 85-100%) and ‘UF (100%, 98- 105%); teeth decreasing in size proximally. Chel- iceral fang moderate (81% length of base), ta- pering to smooth point at distal end. Length of cephalothorax 2.4 mm (2. 2-2. 6), total length 5.4 mm (4. 5-6.0). Chelicerae medium length, 47% (45-75%) length of carapace. Legs usually un- banded, spines variable, 60% length of carapace (Figs. 65-66). Femur I: 7 prolateral, 4 dorsal, 4 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 5 retrolateral, 2 dor- sal, 5 prolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 1 ven- tral spine. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Carapace pale yellow (bright green in life) with indistinct fovea marked with broken semicircle around prolateral margin. Sternum very pale yel- low. Dorsum of abdomen pale yellow in alcohol, green in life, often with patches of red (see color polymorphism under T. tantalus). Venter pale white with distinct darker narrow band running down midline. Seminal receptacles (Fig. 67): Two bulbs linked together in opposing “comma” shapes, only low- er bulb having relatively heavily sclerotized me- dial border. Both bulbs, in particular dorsal bulb, dilated, with central portion enveloped by me- dian lobe. Median lobe smooth doughnut shape that projects behind central portion, and projects out into area approximately that defined by outer limits of bulbs. Color polymorphism. — See T. tantalus above. Material Examined.— This species is found in wet forest only on Maui Island (Table 1): West Maui, Puu Kukui, 4550 ft (1387 m), 31-V-88 and l-VI-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); East Maui, Waikamoi, 4400 ft ( 1 340 m), 8-VI-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish) and 8-II-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J. Burgett); Waikamoi Flume, 192 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 4400 ft (1340 m), 13-VIII-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Waikamoi, Carruthers Camp, 6150 ft (1876 m), 29-V-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish) and 5-II-90 (R.G. Gillespie); Waikamoi, Honomanu Valley, 5200 ft (1585 m), 6-II-90 (R.G. Gillespie). Tetragnatha kauaiensis Simon (Figs. 68-80 and 161) T. kauaiensis Simon (Simon 1900: 472, pi. XIX, fig. 9). Male holotype from Kauai, Halemanu, in the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris, ex- amined. Okuma 1988c: 79-80, fig. 3. Diagnosis. — r. kauaiensis is the only member of the Green Spiny Leg group represented on Kauai. In its melanic form, however, it might be confused with T. pilosa and, perhaps, T. mohihi. The diagnostic features are described under these species. Male: [holotype described by Simon (1900) and redescribed by Okuma (1988c)]. Specimen collected from Mohihi-Wailae Trail (DOFAW Transect 5), 4000 ft (1220 m), Kauai Island (28 March 1990) (coll. R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish): Tooth arrangement on promargin of chelicerae as follows (Fig. 68): ‘sP rather close to T’, ratio of distal end to ‘sP: ‘sP to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsuF 3:2: 4. ‘Gu’ distinct notch that projects out; ‘sP small, pointed spike, much smaller than ‘T’ in both width (53%) and height (30%). ‘T' robust peak directed out perpendicular to margin of chelic- erae. ‘rsu’ 5 straight spikes. Retromargin of che- licerae (Fig. 69): Total of 9 teeth, rather large, pointed spikes. ‘AXP present, tiny notch; teeth 1 , 2 and 5-7 strongest teeth on retromargin. Dor- sal spur fairly long, almost straight finger 17% length of carapace; tip distinctly and equally bi- furcate (Fig. 70). Cheliceral fang only slightly shorter than base. Length of cephalothorax 2.3 mm, total length 5.8 mm. Chelicerae shorter (70%) than length of carapace. Depression of tho- racic fovea distinctly marked with inverted “Y” shape (Fig. 71). Coloration and eye pattern as in female. Leg spination similar to female, but spines shorter (Figs. 72, 73). Conductor Tip (Figs. 74 and 161): Cap pulled strongly down at distal edge; apical projection blunt tip that curls forward. Female: Specimen collected from the Pihea- Alakai Swamp Trail, 3800 ft (1158 m), Kauai Island (8 June 1988) (coll. R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish). Eyes small, PME separated by well over width of PME (Fig. 77). Median ocular area wid- er posteriorly. Lateral eyes slightly separated. Cheliceral margins; Promargin (Fig. 75): series of 7 teeth ‘UF much shorter (50%) than ‘U2’ and ‘U3’, separated from them by 21% cheliceral length. ‘U3’ slightly shorter than ‘U2’, with ‘U3’- ‘U7’ decreasing in size proximally. Retromargin (Fig. 76): series of 10 teeth, rather tall, straight spikes set close together. ‘LF smaller than ‘L2’ (71%), larger than ‘UF (1 18%); teeth decreasing in size proximally. Cheliceral fang moderate (ap- proximately 85% length of base), tapering to smooth point at distal end. Length of cephalo- thorax 2.4 mm (2. 2-2. 6), total length 5.5 mm (4. 6-5. 9). Chelicerae medium in length, 51% length of carapace. Legs usually unbanded, spines variable, 58% length of carapace (Figs. 78-79). Femur I; 6 prolateral, 3 dorsal, 4 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 5 retrolateral, 2 dorsal, 5 prola- teral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: no ventral spines. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Carapace pale yellow (bright green in life), fovea marked with inverted “Y” shape. Sternum very pale yellow. Dorsum of abdomen pale yellow in alcohol, green in life, often with patches of red (see color poly- morphism under T. tantalus). Venter pale white with distinct darker narrow band running down midline. Seminal receptacles (Fig. 80): Two bulbs linked together in opposing “comma” shapes, both up- per and lower bulbs, as well as central portion, having relatively heavily sclerotized medial bor- der. Both bulbs equally dilated, with central por- tion forming constricted “neck”. Median lobe ill-defined. Color polymorphism. — See T. tantalus ahowt. Material Examined. — This species is found in wet forest only on Kauai Island: Pihea-Alakai Swamp Trail, 3800 ft (1 1 58 m), 5-II-88 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Med- eiros), 8-VI-88, 26-III-90, 22-VII-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Alakai Swamp, 3800 ft (1 158 m), 9-VI- 88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Mohihi Ditch, 3500 ft (1067 m), 27-111-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Mohihi-Wailae Trail (DOFAW Transect 5), 4000 ft (1220 m), 28-III-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Nu- alolo Trail, Kuia, 3320 ft (1012 m), 21-VII-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Koaie Stream, 3700 ft (1128 m), 23-VII-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Plateau above Koaie Stream, 4000 ft ( 1 220 m), 24-VII-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Kokee/Kalalau Overlook, 4000 ft (1220 m), 27-VII-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish). GREEN AND RED SPINY LEGS GROUP Characteristics. — There are 2 species in this group, T. perreirai and T. kamakou. The derived GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 193 Figures 6^-S0. — Tetragnatha kauaiensis. 68) Promargin of right chelicera; 69) Retromargin of left chelicera; 70) Dorsal spur of chelicera, lateral view; 7 1 ) carapace, dorsal; 7 2) Right leg I, dorsal; 7 3) Right leg III, prolateral; 74) Left palpus, prolateral. Female allotype. 75) Promargin of right chelicera; 76) Retromargin of left chelicera; 77) Carapace and abdomen, dorsal; 78) Right leg I, dorsal; 79) Right leg III, prolateral; 80) Seminal receptacles, ventral. Scale bar (mm) at Fig. 71 applies to Figs. 68-71; at Fig. 73 to Figs. 72-73; at Fig. 79 to Figs. 78-79. (synapomorphic) features of this group relate pri- marily to the shape and coloration of the ab- domen, cephalothorax and legs, and the eye pat- tern: Both species have a dark green/black coloration to the diamond-shaped abdomen, with a pattern that is highly distinctive in the presence of a medial pair of maroon crescents that accen- tuate the diamond shape, which may also be ex- aggerated dorso-laterally to form 2 rounded humps on either side of the midline. There is no inverted triangle on the midline of the abdomen. The pattern on the carapace is also very distinc- tive, the entire dorsal surface dark, except for a series of paler, roughly triangular-shaped, “is- lands” that radiate out from the fovea. The legs are heavily banded, usually dark. The eyes are 194 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 81-94. — Tetragnatha kainakoir, Male holotype. 81) Promargin of right chelicera; 82) Retromargin of left chelicera; 83) Dorsal spur of chelicera, lateral view; 84) carapace, dorsal; 85) Right leg I, dorsal; 86) Right leg III, prolateral; 87) Left palpus, prolateral. Female allotype. 88) Promargin of right chelicera; 89) Retromargin of left chelicera; 90) Carapace, dorsal; 91) Right leg I, dorsal; 92) Right leg III, prolateral; 93) abdomen, dorsal; 94) Seminal receptacles, ventral. Scale bar (mm) at Fig. 84 applies to Figs. 81-84; at Fig. 90 to Figs. 88, 90; at Fig. 86 to Figs. 85, 86; at Fig. 92 to Figs. 91, 92. GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETHiGNATHA 195 rather large and often close together. The leg spines are relatively short (28-58% length of car- apace). There are 2 species in this group: T. ka- makou and T. perreirai. Tetragnatha kamakou, new species (Figs. 81-94 and 159-160) Types. — Holotype male, allotype female from Kamakou, Puu Kolekole, 3950 ft (1205 m), Mo- lokai Island (21 June 1988) (coll. R.G. Gillespie and C. Parrish), deposited in the Bishop Muse- um, Honolulu. Etymology.— The specific epithet, regarded as a noun in apposition, refers to the type locality of the species, the Nature Conservancy of Ha- waii’s Kamakou Preserve on Molokai. Diagnosis. — r. kamakou is most easily con- fused as indicated: A. On Molokai with T. quasimodo. Either sex can be distinguished as follows: (1) abdominal pattern; (2) Sternum pale translucent yellowish [black in T. quasimodo]-, (3) Venter uniformly medium-brown [in T. quasimodo it has medial pale fawn bar, narrower posteriorly]; (4) leg spi- nation: Tibia I: 4 (or 5) medial, 2 dorsal, 5 lateral spines (in T. quasimodo tibia I has: 4 medial, 2 dorsal, 4 lateral spines). Males lack distinctive wave shape of first tooth ‘sP found in T. quasi- modo, ‘sP being almost contiguous with ‘T’. The conductor tip is also characteristic. B. On Maui with: (a) T. quasimodo. The same characters can be used to distinguish species, ex- cept that leg spination in the two is often the same on this island, (b) T. waikamoi in its more melanic form. The most useful characters for distinguishing these species are (1) abdominal pattern. (2) Venter uniformly medium-brown (in T. waikamoi it has a medial narrow darker bar). (3) Leg spination: Tibia I: 4 medial, 2 dorsal, 4 lateral spines [in T. waikamoi tibia I has: 5 me- dial, 2 dorsal, 5 lateral spines]. T. kamakou can be distinguished from T. per- reirai in both sexes because of the much smaller chelicerae in T. perreirai: In males, these are 69- 70% length of the carapace in T. perreirai, 87- 96% in T. kamakou. In females, these are 54% length of the carapace in T. perreirai, 67-69% in T. kamakou. The armature on the male chelic- erae is entirely different in the two species, in particular the shape and length of the dorsal spur (9. 3-9. 8% length of the carapace and pointed in T. perreirai, 15.6-18.7% and unequally bifur- cated in T. kamakou). Description. — male: (Figs. 81-87). Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 81): Distance be- tween ‘Gu’ ‘sP and ‘T’ approximately equal, ratio of distal end to ‘sP: ‘sP to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsul’ 4:3:3 (occasionally ‘sP may be little closer to ‘T’). ‘Gu’ present, small, flat-topped tubercle; ‘sP small, pointed cone, directed perpendicular to cheli- ceral margin, smaller than ‘T’ in both width (80%, 30-80%) and height (24%, 24-34%). ‘sP well sep- arated from ‘T’, largest tooth (15.5% cheliceral length), robust peak directed almost perpendic- ular to margin of chelicerae. ‘rsu’ 5 (5-7) straight spikes. Retromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 82): Total of 14 (11-14) teeth, long battery of small pegs ‘GP and ‘L2’ largest, robust; 3-5 and 10-end smallest. Dorsal spur long, curved finger, 18.7% (15.7-18.7%) length of carapace; distinct semi- bifurcated tip (dorsal side projects further for- ward) (Fig. 83). Cheliceral fang approximately 93% length of base, bent over at both proximal and distal ends. Length of cephalothorax 2.6 mm (2. 2-2. 6), total length 6.7 mm (5. 3-6. 8) (Fig. 84). Chelicerae only slightly shorter (96%, 87-96%) than length of carapace. Depression of thoracic fovea distinctly marked with inverted “V” shape. Leg spination similar to female, but spines slight- ly shorter (Figs. 85, 86). Femur I: 6 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 4 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 5 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 5 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 1 ventral spine. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Coloration and eye pattern as in female. Shape of abdomen as in female, but medial di- lation less pronounced. Conductor Tip (Figs. 87 and 159): smoothly rounded, high-peaked cap, terminating in small apical projection that curls laterally outwards. Allotype female: (Figs. 88-94). Eyes large, tak- ing up most of ocular area (Fig. 90). PME sep- arated by 70% width of PME. Median ocular area wider at back than at front. Lateral eyes closely contiguous. Cheliceral margins: Promargin (Fig. 88): series of 7 (8) short, thick teeth, ‘U2’-‘U4’ largest. ‘Ul’ 76% (40-80%) height of ‘U2’ and well separated from it by 26% (20-30%) cheli- ceral length; teeth decreasing in size proximally. Retromargin (Fig. 89): series of 1 2 (9-12) slightly smaller, robust teeth, 2 and 3 slightly larger than rest, slightly separated from ‘LI’. ‘LI’ 77% (75- 85%) height of ‘Ul’ and 71% (50-90%) height of ‘L2’; teeth decreasing in size proximally. Cheli- ceral fang approximately 80% length of base, ta- pering to smooth point at distal end. Length of 196 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY cephalothorax 2.7 mm (2. 4-2. 8), total length 6.7 mm (4. 5-7. 7). Chelicerae long, 69% (65-75%) length of carapace. Legs banded, spines very dis- tinct but relatively short, 54% (45-60%) length of carapace (Figs. 91-92). Femur I: 5 (4) prola- teral, 3 dorsal, 5 (4) retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 4 (5) prolateral, 2 dorsal, 5 (4) retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I; 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 (2) retro- lateral spines. Femur III: 1 ventral spine. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Depression of ce- phalothoracic fovea an elongate diamond shape. Cephalothoracic pattern very distinct, broad “Y” shape, with variable pairs of lateral wings radi- ating from in front of thoracic fovea. Sternum uniformly pale yellowish. Abdomen with pair of distinct, medial crescents on either side; no black inverted triangle (Fig. 93). Rest of pattern con- sists of series of paired parallel marks running down on either side of midline. Venter uniformly dark. Seminal receptacles (Fig. 94): Two bulbs linked together in opposing “comma” shapes; sclero- tization very weak. Both bulbs slightly expanded at tips, lower bulb has long, rather narrow, stalk joining it to central portion. Central portion sim- ilar in width to upper bulb. Median lobe in form of expanded balloon that projects out into area approximately defined by outer limits of bulbs. Color polymorphism. — I have found very little evidence of any color polymorphism in either members of Green and Red Spiny Leg group, although some specimens are much darker than others. Interisland Variation. — Molokai representa- tives have a longer dorsal spur (18.5-18.7% length of carapace, as compared to 15.7-16.7% on Maui). They are also a little larger (average length of carapace 2. 5-2. 6 mm, as compared to 2.4-2. 5 on Maui) and the first leg is longer (10.0-10.2% length of carapace as compared to 8. 3-8. 8% on Maui). Maui representatives usually have 4 lat- eral spines on the tibia of the first leg, whereas there appear always to be 5 in Molokai repre- sentatives. The conductor cap is also much broader in Maui representatives (Fig. 160) than those on Molokai (Fig. 159). This latter differ- ence is striking, but at present I am considering these populations to belong to the same species. Material Examined. — This species is found only in wet forest on Molokai and Maui islands (Table 1): Molokai Island, Kamakou, 3800 ft (1158 m), 21-23- Vl-88, 1-II-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Kaun- uohua Summit, Kamakou, 4535 ft (1382 m), 2-II-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J. Halloran). Maui Island: West Maui, Puu Kukui, 4550 ft (1387 m), 31-V-88 and 1 -VI-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); East Maui, Waikamoi, 4400 ft ( 1 340 m), 8-VI-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish) and 8-II-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J. Burgett); Waikamoi Flume, 4400 ft (1340 m), 13-VIII-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Waikamoi, Carruthers Camp, 6150 ft (1876 m), 29-V-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish) and 5-11-90 (R.G. Gillespie); Waikamoi, Honomanu Val- ley, 5200 ft (1585 m), 6-11-90 (R.G. Gillespie); Bogs, NE Rift Haleakala, 5500 ft (1676 m), 15-1-88 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros), Kipahulu Valley, 4000 ft (1220 m), 15-V-90 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros); 5000 ft (1524 m), 14-V-90 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros); 6500 ft (1980 m), 27-1 V-88 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros). Tetragnatha perreirai, new species (Figs. 95-108 and 162) Types. — Holotype male from Mount Kaala, Waianae Mountains, 4000 ft (1220 m), Oahu Island (8 January 1990) (coll. W.D. Ferreira), allotype female from Mount Kaala, Waianae Mountains, 4000 ft (1220 m), Oahu Island (29 April 1990) (coll. R.G. Gillespie), deposited in the Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Etymology. — The specific epithet (possessive noun) is in recognition of the collector of the holotype, W.D. Ferreira, an excellent naturalist and entomologist in the Hawaiian Evolutionary Biology Frogram. Diagnosis. — r. perreirai is most easily con- fused with T. polychromata in its more melanic form. The most useful characters for distinguish- ing these species are: (1) Abdominal pattern. (2) Venter uniformly medium-brown [in T. poly- chromata it has a medial narrow darker bar]. (3) Cheliceral length [in males, these are 69-70% length of carapace in T. perreirai, 90-93% in T. polychromata. In females, they are 54% length of carapace in T. perreirai, 66% in T. polychro- mata]. The armature on male chelicerae is en- tirely different in the 2 species, in particular the shape and length of the dorsal spur (9. 3-9. 8% length of carapace and almost straight in T. per- reirai, 1 5.5-20.0% and bent in T. polychromata). It can be distinguished from T. kamakou as de- scribed above. Description.- male: (Figs. 95-101). Fromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 95): ‘rsuF placed close to ‘T’, ratio of distal end to ‘sF: ‘sF to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsul’ 4:4:2. ‘Gu’ medium-sized, pointed cone, approximately same width and height as ‘sF; ‘sF robust, wide-based cone, smaller than ‘T’ in both width (61%, 60-63 %) and height GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 197 Figures 95-108. — Tetragnatha peneimv, Male holotype. 95) Promargin of right chelicera; 96) Retromargin of left chelicera; 97) Dorsal spur of chelicera, lateral view; 98) carapace, dorsal; 99) Right leg I, dorsal; 100) Right leg III, prolateral; 101) Left palpus, prolateral. Female allotype. 102) Promargin of right chelicera; 103) Retro- margin of left chelicera; 104) Carapace, dorsal; 105) Right leg I, dorsal; 106) Right leg III, prolateral; 107) abdomen, dorsal; 108) Seminal receptacles, ventral. Scale bar (mm) at Fig. 95 applies to Figs. 95-97; at Fig. 104 to Figs. 102-104; at Fig. 100 to Figs. 99, 100; at Fig. 106 to Figs. 105, 106. (53%, 45-54%). ‘T’ robust peak, bent slightly up towards distal end. ‘rsu’ 6 straight spikes. Retro- margin of chelicerae (Fig. 96): Total of 8 teeth, in addition to ‘AXf. ‘AXl’ as large as main teeth; ‘Gl’ and ‘L2’ wider than rest of teeth on retro- margin. Dorsal spur short, stubby, pointed fin- ger, 9.8% (9. 2-9. 9 %) length of carapace; tip pointed on dorsal side (Fig. 97). Cheliceral fang considerably shorter than base, bent very slightly and smoothly over at distal end. Length of ceph- alothorax 2.3 mm (2. 1-2.4), total length 5.7 mm (Fig. 98). Chelicerae much shorter (69%) than length of carapace. Depression of thoracic fovea distinctly marked with inverted “Y” shape. Leg 198 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY spination similar to female, but spines slightly shorter (Figs. 99-100). Femur I: 5 prolateral, 5 dorsal, 4 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 4 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 4 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III; 1 ventral spine. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Coloration and eye pattern as in female. Shape of abdomen as in female, but medial di- lation less pronounced. Conductor Tip (Figs. 101 and 162): smoothly rounded, high-peaked cap, terminating in small apical projection that has thin curl that projects laterally outward at tip. Allotype female-. (Figs. 102-108). Eyes large, occupying most of ocular area (Fig. 104). PME separated by just over half width of PME. Me- dian ocular area wider at back than in front. Lateral eyes contiguous. Cheliceral margins: Pro- margin (Fig. 1 02): series of 6 medium-sized teeth ‘U2’ and ‘U3’ largest, well separated from ‘UF. ‘Ur 77% height of ‘U2’, separated from it by 18% cheliceral length; teeth decreasing in size proximally. Retromargin (Fig. 103): series of 10 small teeth, set very close together and of similar size (last couple smaller); 'L 1 ’ approximately same height as both ‘UF and ‘L2’. Cheliceral fang ap- proximately 83% length of base, tapering to smooth point at distal end. Length of cephalo- thorax 2.3 mm, total length 4.4 mm. Chelicerae much shorter (54%) than length of carapace. Legs dark and distinctly banded, spines very distinct, although leg spines relatively short (approxi- mately 33% length of carapace) (Figs. 105-106). Femur I: 4 prolateral, 3 dorsal, 4 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 4 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 4 retrola- teral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: no ventral spines. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Depression of cephalothoracic fovea distinctly marked with inverted “Y” shape on anterior margin. Cara- pace dark brown with 3 pairs of pale triangular blocks radiating from fovea. Sternum pale yel- lowish. Abdomen oval/diamond-shaped, exag- gerated dorso-laterally into 2 lateral, rounded humps (Fig. 107). Color pattern consists of var- ious combinations of red (on lateral humps) and dark green. Venter uniformly colored. Seminal receptacles (Fig. 108): Two bulbs linked together in opposing “comma” shapes, each with narrow sclerotized medial border. Both bulbs, in particular upper, dilated at tip, with central portion narrower. Median lobe ill-de- fined, semi-collapsed balloon that projects out into area approximately that defined by outer limits of bulbs. Color polymorphism.— See T. kamakou above. Material Examined. — This species is found only in bog habitat on Oahu Island. Waianae Mountains (Ta- ble 1); Summit of Mount Kaala, 4000 ft (1220 m), 29- lV-90 (R.G. Gillespie). Tetragnatha pilosa, new species (Figs. 109-122 and 163) Types.- Holotype male from Mohihi Ditch, approximately 3.2 km beyond the end of Camp 10 Road, 3500 ft (1067 m), Kauai Island (26 March 1990) (coll. R.G. Gillespie and C. Par- rish), allotype female from the Alakai Swamp, 4000 ft (1220 m), Kauai Island (6 March 1988) (coll. R.G. Gillespie and C. Parrish), deposited in the Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Etymology. — From pilus (Latin), hair. The specific epithet is an adjective referring to the extraordinarily “hairy” looking femora of the third legs. These are very much longer and more numerous than on any other species of Hawaiian Tetragnatha. Diagnosis. — r. pilosa is unlikely to be con- fused with any other species because of its very distinctive leg spination on femora of 3rd leg, and its color pattern. It might be possible to con- fuse it with T. kauaiensis in the more melanic form of this species. The most useful characters for distinguishing T. pilosa are (1) Leg spination [especially on femora of 3rd leg]. (2) Cephalo- thoracic pattern: Only T. pilosa has arms of “Y” shape running parallel then turning sharply to- wards stem. In males, the dorsal spur in T. pilosa is much shorter [8. 5-9. 5% length of carapace as compared to 13.9% in T. kauaiensis]. 'Descnption.— Holotype male: i¥'\gs,. 109-1 15). Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 109): Distance be- tween distal end and ‘sP approximately equal to distance between ‘sF and ‘rsuF, ratio of distal end to ‘sF: ‘sF to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsuF 5:2:3 (occa- sionally 5:3:2). ‘Gu’ distinct, medium-sized cone, almost same size as ‘sF; ‘sF rather small spike, pointed slightly up towards distal end. Much nar- rower than ‘T’, by 33% (30-50%), and shorter, 63% height (53-63%). ‘T’ robust, pointed very slightly up towards distal end. ‘rsu’ 6 straight spikes. Retromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 110): Total of 8 (up to 10) teeth. ‘AXF absent. Dorsal spur short (8.7% length of carapace, 8.6-9. 5%), shaped like stubby, almost straight, finger, with GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 199 Figures \09-\12. — Tetragnatha pilosa\ Male holotype. 109) Promargin of right chelicera; 1 10) Retromargin of left chelicera; 111) Dorsal spur of chelicera, lateral view; 1 12) carapace, dorsal; 1 13) Right leg I, dorsal; 1 14) Right leg III, prolateral; 1 15) Left palpus, prolateral. Female allotype. 1 16) Promargin of right chelicera; 1 17) Retromargin of left chelicera; 1 18) Carapace, dorsal; 1 19) Right leg I, dorsal; 120) Right leg III, prolateral; 121) abdomen, dorsal; 122) Seminal receptacles, ventral. Scale bar (mm) at Fig. 1 1 5 applies to Figs. 111-11 5; at Fig. 1 18 to Figs. 1 16-118; at Fig. 1 14 to Figs. 113, 1 14; at Fig. 120 to Figs. 1 19, 120. rounded tip (Fig. 111). Cheliceral fang distinctly shorter than base and smoothly curved at both proximal and distal ends (not bent sharply over). Length of cephalothorax 2.4 mm (2. 3-2.4), total length 5.9 mm (Fig. 1 1 2). Chelicerae much short- er (62%, 56-64%) than length of carapace. De- pression of thoracic fovea distinctly marked with smoothly rounded “m” shape. Leg spination similar to female, but spines shorter (Figs. 1 1 3- 1 14). Femur I: 6 prolateral, 4 dorsal, 2 retrola- 200 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY teral spines. Tibia I: 6 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 5 (6) retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 5 ventral spines. Tibia III: 3 pairs of ventral spines. Col- oration and eye pattern as in female. Conductor Tip (Figs. 1 15 and 163): Cap low and angular, pulled out laterally into “hooked- nose” shape. Terminates in small hook that pro- jects laterally forwards. Allotype female: (Figs. 1 16-122). All eyes large, occupying most of ocular area (Fig. 1 18). PME separated by just over half width of PME. Me- dian ocular area slightly wider in front than back. Lateral eyes contiguous. Cheliceral margins: Pro- margin (Fig. 1 16): series of 8 large, robust teeth ‘U2’ and ‘U3’ largest, well separated from ‘UF. ‘U r 71% height of ‘U2’, separated from it by 1 9% ( 1 8-23%) cheliceral length; teeth decreasing in size proximally. Retromargin (Fig. 1 1 7): series of 9 slightly smaller, robust teeth ‘L2’ and ‘L3’ largest, slightly separated from ‘LF (‘LF 67% height of ‘UF and 62% height of ‘L2’); teeth decrease in size proximally. Cheliceral fang short (78% length of base), tapering to smooth point at distal end. Length of cephalothorax 2.7 mm (2. 5-2. 7), total length 5.5 mm (5. 3-6. 7). Chelic- erae much shorter (54%) than length of carapace. Legs distinctly banded, spines very distinct, al- though leg spines relatively short (44 % length of carapace) (Figs. 1 19, 120). Femur I: 6 prola- teral, 4 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 5 (6) prolateral, 2 dorsal, 5 (6) retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 2 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 10 ventral spines. Tibia III: 3 pairs of ventral spines. Depression of cephalo- thoracic fovea distinctly marked with rounded “m” shape on anterior margin. Cephalothoracic pattern distinct angular “Y” shape, unusual in having arms run parallel before turning sharply to converge at stem. Three (1-3) pairs of lines radiating out from fovea to edge of carapace. Sternum yellow with fairly wide dark border ex- cept on anterior margin. Abdomen oval, pattern as shown in Fig. 121. Venter pale grey with 2 pairs of silvery dots on either side of midline. Seminal receptacles (Fig. 122): Two bulbs linked together in opposing “comma” shapes; sclerotization weak. Upper bulb dilated, lower bulb narrower, same width as central portion; not greatly dilated. Median lobe angular dough- nut shape that projects out into area approxi- mately that defined by outer limits of bulbs. Color polymorphism. — Little evidence of this. Material Examined.— This species has been found only in wet forest on Kauai Island (Table 1): Pihea- Alakai Swamp Trail, 3800 ft (1 158 m), 5-II-88 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros), 8-VI-88, 26-III-90, 22- VII-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Alakai Swamp, 3800 ft (1158 m), 9-VI-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Par- rish); Mohihi Ditch, 3500 ft (1067 m), 27-III-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Mohihi-Wailae Trail (DOFAW Transect 5), 4000 ft ( 1 220 m), 28-III-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Nualolo Trail, Kuia, 3320 ft (1012 m), 21-VII-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish; Koaie Stream, 3700 ft (1 128 m), 23-VII-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Par- rish); Plateau above Koaie Stream, 4000 ft (1220 m), 24-VI1-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Kokee/Ka- lalau Overlook, 4000 ft (1220 m), 27-VII-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish). Tetmgnatha quasimodo, new species (Figs. 123-136 and 166-169) Types. — Holotype male from Waianae Kai, Waianae Mountains, 1900 ft (580 m), Oahu Is- land (25 June 1988) (coll. R.G. Gillespie, J.S. Strazanac and C. Parrish), allotype female from Volcano Village, 3500 ft (1067 m), Hawaii Island (17 June 1989) (coll. R.G. Gillespie and C. Par- rish), deposited in the Bishop Museum, Hono- lulu. Etymology.— The common name of this spe- cies is “Humpback Spiny”, because of the prom- inent mid-dorsal peak of the abdomen. The spe- cific epithet, regarded as a noun in apposition, refers to Victor Hugo’s “Hunchback of Notre Dame”. Diagnosis. — r. kamakou and T. perreirai are the only species with which T. quasimodo might be confused. The abdomen in T. quasimodo is widest in the middle, with a medial distinct black inverted triangle just below the mid- ventral line. Sternum dark-dusky. Legs banded and clothed with robust spines. In the male, the first tooth ‘sP takes the form of a strong, down-curved wave, almost contiguous with the erect and pointed 2nd tooth ‘T’. Other distinguishing features have been discussed above. Description. —//o/ofvp^ male: (Figs. 1 23-129). Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 123): Distance be- tween distal end and ‘sP very long, ratio of distal end to ‘sP: ‘sP to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsuF 5:1:4 (occa- sionally 6:1:3). ‘Gu’ present, small tubercle; ‘sP large, very distinctive wave shape pointing prox- imally, almost contiguous with ‘T’; almost ex- actly same width as ‘T’, but considerably shorter, 39% height (37-47%). ‘T’ robust peak directed perpendicular to margin of chelicerae (separation GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 201 Figures \23-l36. — Tetragnatha qiiasimodo\ Male holotype. 123) Promargin of right chelicera; 124) Retro- margin of left chelicera; 125) Dorsal spur of chelicera, lateral view; 126) carapace, dorsal; 127) Right leg I, dorsal; 128) Right leg III, prolateral; 129) Left palpus, prolateral. Female allotype. 130) Promargin of right chelicera; 131) Retromargin of left chelicera; 132) Carapace, dorsal; 133) Right leg I, dorsal; 134) Right leg III, prolateral; 135) abdomen, dorsal; 136) Seminal receptacles, ventral. Scale bar (mm) at Fig. 126 applies to Figs. 123-126; at Fig. 132 to Figs. 130-132; at Fig. 128 to Figs. 127, 128; at Fig. 134 to Figs. 133, 134. 202 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY between ‘si’ and ‘T’ only 4-8% of cheliceral length), ‘rsu’ 4 (up to 5) straight spikes. Retro- margin of chelicerae (Fig. 124): Total of 8 teeth. ‘AXr small apical tubercle; ‘Gl’ and ‘L2’ strong, much stronger than rest of teeth on retromargin; 3-4 very small pegs; 5-8 slightly longer, straight pegs. Dorsal spur long, curved finger 20.8% (20.8- 21.0%) length of carapace; tip distinctly bifur- cated, either equally or unequally (Fig. 125). Cheliceral fang long (same length as base, bent sharply over at both proximal and distal ends). Length of cephalothorax 2.2 mm (2. 2-3. 2), total length 6.0 mm (6. 0-7.0) (Fig. 126). Chelicerae slightly shorter (93%, 92-94%) than length of carapace. Depression of thoracic fovea distinctly marked with broken semicircle shape. Leg spination similar to female, but spines shorter (Figs. 127-128). Femur I: 6 prolateral, 3 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Tibia 1: 4 prolateral, 2 dor- sal, 5 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prola- teral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: no ventral spines. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Coloration and eye pattern as in female. Abdomen shape as in female, but median tu- bercle less pronounced. Conductor Tip (Figs. 129 and 166): smooth, evenly rounded, helmet-like cap with tip that hooks inwards, making it look like shepherd’s crook. Allotype female: (Figs. 1 30-136). All eyes rath- er small (Fig. 1 32). PME separated by approxi- mately width of PME. Median ocular area wider at back than at front. Lateral eyes closely con- tiguous. Cheliceral margins: Promargin (Fig. 1 30): series of 8 (7) short, thick teeth ‘U2’ and ‘U3’ largest, well separated from ‘Ul’, ‘Ul’ 40% (range 37-50%) height of‘U2’, separated from it by 38% (20-40%) cheliceral length; teeth decreasing in size proximally. Retromargin (Fig. 131): series of 9 slightly smaller, robust teeth ‘L2’ largest, well separated from ‘LI’; ‘LI’ only 27% (20- 40%) height of ‘L2’, but same size as ‘Ul’; teeth decreasing in size proximally. Cheliceral fang ap- proximately 80% length of base, tapering to smooth point at distal end. Length of cephalo- thorax 3.0 mm (2. 5-3. 2), total length 7.7 mm (5. 3-8. 8). Chelicerae quite short, 79% (60-80%) length of carapace. Legs banded, spines very dis- tinct, although relatively short (48% length of carapace, 28-58%) (Figs. 133-134). Femur I: 5 (4) prolateral, 2 (3) dorsal, 5 (4) retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 5 (4) prolateral, 2 dorsal, 5 (4) retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 (2) retrolateral spines. Femur III: no ventral spines. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Depression of cephalothoracic fovea distinctly marked with broken semicircle on anterior margin. Cephal- othoracic pattern distinct “Y” shape. Sternum dark or dusky. Abdomen distinctly diamond shaped, often exaggerated laterally, with sub-me- dial distinct, small black inverted triangle, which may which may be drawn up into short, finger- like tubercle (Fig. 135). Color pattern consists of various combinations of black, brown and grey. Venter stippled silver with medial pale fawn bar, narrower posteriorly. Seminal receptacles (Fig. 136): Two bulbs linked together in opposing “comma” shapes; sclerotization rather strong, particularly along median perimeter of lower bulb and central por- tion. Both bulbs, in particular dorsal bulb, di- lated, with central portion enveloped by median lobe. Median lobe angular, squarish doughnut shape that projects slightly behind central por- tion, and projects into area defined approxi- mately by outer limits of bulbs. Color polymorphism.— This species exhibits extraordinary diversity in color patterns: The amount and location of black and brown patches and lines vary tremendously; green and/or white may often be present, and may sometimes even be dominant colors. However, the median, in- verted black triangle (drawn up, to a greater or lesser degree, into a tubercle) is always present. Similarly, the venter always has a medial pale tan bar, narrower posteriorly, and the sternum is always black (sometimes fading to dusky in alcohol). Interisland Variation. — I have examined 10 individuals of this species from each of Oahu, Molokai, Maui and Hawaii, and 5 from Lanai. There is considerable variation between islands. But it seems like this variation is continuous, without any clear-cut demarcations. At present, therefore, I consider representatives on these is- lands as populations of the same species. Con- ductor tips can be compared for representatives from Oahu (Fig. 166), Lanai (Fig. 167), Maui (Fig. 168) and Hawaii (Fig. 169). Differences are summarized in Table 2. Material Examined.— This species is found in dry, mesic and wet forest on all islands except Kauai (Table l ) : Hawaii Island, Hakalau, Mauna Kea, 6 1 50 ft ( 1 876 m) , 12-X-90 (R.G. Gillespie, D.J. Preston & I. Felger). Kipukas, Mauna Kea, 5800 ft (1770 m), 13-X-90(R.G. Gillespie, D.J. Preston, J. Lepson & I. Felger); Kipukas, GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 203 Table 2.— Interisland variation in Tetragnatha quasi modo, new species, comparing the leg spines, bifurcation of the dorsal spur, and the conductor tip of the male palp. Oahu Molokai Lanai Maui Hawaii Leg spines: Retrolateral 5 4 4 4 5 Dorsal 2 2 2 2 2 Prolateral 5(4) 4 4 4 5(4) Bifurcation of dorsal spur Equal Equal Unequal Unequal Equal Conductor tip: Cap slightly curled X X X — — Backward hook present - - - X X Mauna Kea, 5440 ft (1658 m), 12-IIL90 (R.G. Gilles- pie & J.I.M. Gillespie); Kipuka 8, Mauna Kea, 5240 ft, 25-VII-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Kipuka 6, Mauna Kea, 5050 ft, 25-VII-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Kipuka, Saddle Road, 2700 ft (823 m), 25- VII-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Wailuku River, 3500 ft (1067 m), l-VIII-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Par- rish); Hualalai, 3600 ft (1097 m) 30-VII-88 (R.G. Gil- lespie & C. Parrish); Kealakekua Ranch, 3740 ft (1 140 m), 3060 ft (933 m), 9-III-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J.I.M. Gillespie); Puu Makaala, Stainback Highway, 4000 ft (1220 m), 14-X-90 (R.G. Gillespie, D.J. Preston & 1. Felger); Puu Makaala, Stainback Highway, 2090 ft (637 m), 3070 ft (936 m), 4010 ft (1222 m), 17-111-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J.I.M. Gillespie); Puu Makaala, End Wright Rd., 4300 ft 21-X-90 (R.G. Gillespie & D.J. Preston); Kipahoehoe 4000 ft ( 1 220 m) 1 6-X-90 (R.G. Gillespie, D.J. Preston & J. Kiyabu); Halepiula Road, Manuka, 3700 ft (1 128 m), 17-X-90 (R.G. Gillespie, D.J. Pres- ton &J. Burgett); Laupahoehoe, 4 1 20 ft (1257 m), 3200 ft (976 m), 19-X-90 (R.G. Gillespie, D.J. Preston & J. Burgett); Laupahoehoe, 2300 ft (700 m), 14-III-90, 3240 ft (988 m), 13-111-90, 4020 ft(1225m), 14-111-90,4210 ft (1283 m), 13-III-90, 6240 ft (1902 m), 15-III-90, 5140 ft (1567 m), 13-III-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J.I.M. Gillespie); Mauna Loa Strip Rd, 5 5 1 0 ft ( 1 680 m), 3805 ft (1 160 m), 10-III-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J.I.M. Gilles- pie); Thurston, Volcano, 4000 ft (1220 m), 31-VII-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Kohala, 3780 ft (1 152 m), 27-VII-88, 28-VII-88 (R.G. Gillespie, W.D. Per- reira, K.Y. Kaneshiro & C. Parrish). Maui Island, West Maui, Puu Kukui, 4550 ft (1387 m), 31-V-88, 1-VI- 88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish). East Maui, Waika- moi, 4400 ft (1340 m), 8- VI-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); 8-II-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J. Burgett); Wai- kamoi Flume, 4400 ft ( 1 340 m), 1 3-VIII-88 (R.G. Gil- lespie & C. Parrish); Waikamoi, Carruthers Camp, 6 1 50 ft (1876 m), 29-V-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); 5- 11-90 (R.G. Gillespie); Waikamoi, Honomanu Valley, 5200 ft (1585 m), 6-II-90 (R.G. Gillespie); Hanawi, 1520 ft (463 m), 9-II-90 (R.G. Gillespie & R. Rydell); 1 l-V-90 (R.G. Gillespie, R. Rydell & J. Burgett); Bogs, NE Rift Haleakala, 5500 ft (1676 m), 15-1-88 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros); Kipahulu Valley, 2000 ft (610 m), lO-VI-89, 4000 ft (1220 m), 1 l-VI-89 (A.C. Medeiros); Kipahulu Valley, 2000 ft (610 m), 17-V- 90, 3000 ft (914 m) 16-V-90 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros). Kipahulu Valley, 3000 ft (914 m), 16-V- 90, 4000 ft (1220 m), 15-V-90, 5000 ft (1524 m), 14- V-90 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros). Kipahulu Val- ley, 6500 ft (1980 m), 27-1 V-88 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros). Pohakuokala, Crater Road, 5000 ft (1524 m), 1 l-V-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J. Burgett). Molokai Island, Kamakou, 3800 ft (1158 m), 21-23-VI-88, 1- 11-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); Kaunuohua Sum- mit, Kamakou, 4535 ft (1382 m), 2-II-90 (R.G. Gil- lespie & J. Halloran); Lanai Island, Lanaihale, 3370 ft (1027 m), 14-VIII-90 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Med- eiros); Oahu Island, Waianae Kai, 1900 ft (580 m), 25-VI-88 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros); Peacock Rats, 1800 ft (550 m), 18-VIII-88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish). Tetragnatha restricta Simon (Figs. 137-144 and 164) Tetragnatha restricta Simon (Simon 1900: 473-474, pi. XIX, fig. 10). Male holotype from Hawaii, Kona, in the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle de Par- is, examined. Okuma 1988c: 83-84, fig. 7. Diagnosis. — r. restricta is most easily con- fused with T. quasimodo. The most useful char- acters for distinguishing these species are (1) ab- dominal shape: the flat topped abdomen of T. restricta is very distinctive, contrasting with the peaked abdomen of T. quasimodo, and (2) ab- dominal pattern: males are readily differentiated on the basis of their cheliceral armature, in par- ticular the absence of the wave-like first tooth so characteristic of T. quasimodo. Male: [holotype described by Simon (1900) and redescribed by Okuma (1988c)]. Specimen 204 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures \37-\44. — Tetragnatha restricta Simon. Male: 137) Promargin of right chelicera: 138) Retro- margin of left chelicera; 139) Dorsal spur of chelicera, lateral view; 140) carapace, dorsal; 141) Right leg I, dorsal; 142) Right leg III, prolateral; 143) Left palpus, prolateral. Female: 144) Seminal receptacles. Scale bar (mm) at Fig. 140 applies to Figs. 137-140; at Fig. 142 to Figs. 141, 142. collected from Laupahoehoe, 3240 ft (988 m), Hawaii Island (13 March 1990) (coll. J.I.M. Gil- lespie & R.G. Gillespie): Eyes rather large (Fig. 1 40). PME separated by approximately half width of PME. Median ocular area slightly narrower at back than at front. Lateral eyes contiguous. Pro- margin of chelicerae: ‘sP close to ‘T’, ratio of distal end to ‘sP: ‘sP to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsuF 5:2:4 (Fig. 137). ‘Gu’ absent; ‘sP tiny bump, much smaller than ‘T’ in both width (48%) and height (16%). ‘T’ robust peak pointing rather sharply and directly (not curved) upwards (pointing away from ‘rsuF and towards ‘sP. ‘rsu’ 5 straight spikes. Retromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 138): Total of 6 teeth. ‘AXP absent; ‘GP strong, much stronger than rest of teeth on retromargin; 3-4 very small pegs; 5-8 slightly longer, straight pegs. Dorsal spur long, curved finger 13% cheliceral length; tip distinctly and unequally bifurcated (Fig. 1 39). Cheliceral fang considerably shorter than base. Length of cephalothorax 1 .7 mm, total length 3.0 mm (Fig. 140). Chelicerae shorter (74%) than length of carapace. Depression of thoracic fovea distinctly marked with smoothly rounded in- verted “U” shape. Coloration as in female. Leg spination similar to female, but spines shorter (Figs. 141-142). Conductor Tip (Figs. 143 and 164): smoothly rounded, high cap, terminating in distinct apical projection that curls forwards and upwards. Female allotype: Eyes similar to male. Cheli- ceral margins: Promargin: series of 6 medium- sized teeth ‘U2’ and ‘U3’ largest, well separated from ‘Ur. ‘Ul’ same height as ‘U2’, separated from it by 24% cheliceral length; teeth decreasing in size proximally. Retromargin: series of 7 fairly large teeth: ‘L 1 ’ much smaller than ‘U 1 ’ and ‘L2’. Cheliceral fang approximately 84% length of base, tapering to smooth point at distal end. Length of cephalothorax 1.8 mm, total length 3.4 mm. Chelicerae much shorter (53%) than length of carapace. Legs quite dark, spotted under dorsal spines on femora and banded on tibia. Leg spi- nation (measured from another female from Ha- waii Island since leg spines were absent from the holotype: female from Laupahoehoe, 3240 ft (988 m), 1 3 March 1 990, coll. J.I.M. Gillespie & R.G. Gillespie): Spines very distinct, although rela- tively short (approximately 48% length of cara- pace). Femur I: 5 prolateral, 3 dorsal, 4 retro- lateral spines. Tibia I: 4 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 4 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: no ven- tral spines. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Depression of cephalothoracic fovea distinctly marked with inverted “U” shape on anterior margin. Carapace dark brown with 4 pairs of pale lines radiating from fovea. Sternum dark. Ab- domen pyriform in shape from above, raised up GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA along medial line, so that, when observed from front, medial portion appears like flat plateau across abdomen. Color pattern consists of vari- ous combinations of grey and black, often with rather dark line running longitudinally down midline. Lateral lines may diverge near anterior margin, running out towards lateral margins at midline. Seminal receptacles [from Maui representative of species, Waikamoi Flume, 4400 ft (1340 m), 8 July 1988, coll. R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish)] (Fig. 144); Two bulbs linked together in oppos- ing, rounded “C” shapes; sclerotization rather strong, particularly along median perimeter of both lower and upper bulbs and central portion. Both bulbs slightly dilated. Median lobe irregular doughnut shape that projects out into area ap- proximately that defined by outer limits of bulbs. Color polymorphism. — Little evidence of this. Interisland Variation. — This species is found mostly in mesic forest on both Hawaii and East Maui. The primary difference between these 2 populations is in the tip of the conductor of the male palp. Both populations have a smoothly rounded, medium height cap, terminating in a distinct apical projection that curls forwards and upwards. However, the length of the apical pro- jection is almost the same length as the cap on Maui, whereas it is much smaller on Hawaii. The only other difference is that ‘T’ and ‘rsuT are closer in Maui representatives, the ratio; distal end of chelicerae to ‘si’; ‘si’ to ‘T’; ‘T’ to ‘rsul’ 5;3;2 rather than 4;2;4 or 5;2;4. However, in all other respects, the species appear to differ little on the two islands. At present, therefore, I con- sider representatives on these islands as popu- lations of the same species. Material Examined. — //a»va/; Island, Hakalau, Mauna Kea, 6150 ft (1876 m), 12-X-90 (R.G. Gilles- pie, D.J. Preston & 1. Felger). Kipahoehoe, 4000 ft (1220 m) 16-X-90 (R.G. Gillespie, D.J. Preston & J. Kiyabu); Halepiula Road, Manuka, 3700 ft (1 128 m), 17-X-90 (R.G. Gillespie, D.J. Preston & J. Burgett); Laupahoehoe, 4 1 20 ft, 3200, 19-X-90 (R.G. Gillespie, D.J. Preston & J. Burgett); Laupahoehoe, 3240 ft (988 m), 13-III-90, 4020 ft (1225 m), 14-III-90 (R.G. Gil- lespie & J.I.M. Gillespie); Mauna Loa Strip Rd, 6540 ft (1993 m) (R.G. Gillespie & J.I.M. Gillespie). Maui Island. East Maui, Waikamoi, 4400 ft (1340 m), 8-VI- 88 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); 8-II-90 (R.G. Gil- lespie & J. Burgett); Kipahulu Valley, 2000 ft (610 m), 17-V-90, 3000 ft (914 m) 16-V-90 (R.G. Gillespie & A.C. Medeiros). Pohakuokala, Crater Road, 5000 ft (1524 m), 1 l-V-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J. Burgett). 205 Figures \A5-\52. — Tetragnatha mohilii, male ho- lotype. 145) Promargin of right chelicera; 146) Retro- margin of left chelicera; 147) Dorsal spur of chelicera, lateral view; 148) carapace, dorsal; 149) Right leg I, dorsal; 150) Right leg III, prolateral; 151) abdomen, dorsal; 152) Left palpus, prolateral. Scale bar (mm) at Fig. 148 applies to Figs. 145-148; at Fig. 150 to Figs. 149, 150. Tetragnatha mohihi, new species (Figs. 145-152 and 165) Types. — Holotype male from the Mohihi Ditch, 3500 ft (1067 m), Kauai Island (21 March 1990) (coll. R.G. Gillespie and C. Parrish). Fe- male unknown. Holotype deposited in the Bish- op Museum, Honolulu. Etymology.— The specific epithet, regarded as a noun in apposition, refers to the type locality 206 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 1 53-1 64. -Scanning electron micrographs of conductor tips of male palps (scale on each x 400): 153) T. tantalus- 154) T. polycliromata-, 155) T. brevignatha (Hawaii); 156) T. brevignatha (Maui); 157) T. macra- cantha', 158) T. waikainob 159) T. kainakou (Molokai); 160) T. kamakou (Maui); 161) T. kauaiensis', 162) T. peneirak 163) T. pilosa-, 164)7'. restricta. GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 207 Figures 165-169.— Scanning electron micrographs of conductor tips of male palps (scale on each x 400); 165) T. mohihi\ 166) T. quasi modo {Oahu)-, 167) T. quasimodo {hana\)\ 168) T. quasimodo (Mam)', 169) T. qiiasimodo (Hawaii). of the species, Mohihi Ditch, just beyond the end of Camp 10 Road, on the flanks of Mount Wai- aleale. Diagnosis. — r. mohihi has many unique fea- tures, and is unlikely to be confused with any other species. The only potential candidates for confusion would be T. pilosa and more melanic form of T. kauaiensis. T. mohihi can be distin- guished from either of these because of: (1) its short chelicerae with a long dorsal spur [T. pilosa has short chelicerae and a short dorsal spur, T. kauaiensis has long chelicerae and long dorsal spur], (2) distinctive abdominal pattern, and (3) leg spination [T. mohihi has 4 retrolateral, 2 dor- sal, 3(4) prolateral spines; T. pilosa has 6 (5) retrolateral, 2 dorsal, 6 (5) prolateral and T. kauaiensis has 5 retrolateral, 2 dorsal, 5 prola- teral spines]. In males, the tip of the conductor is very characteristic: the cap is much higher than either T. pilosa or T. kauaiensis, and also has a long apical projection, which is lacking in the other two species. Description.— //o/o/ype’ ma/e’.'(Figs. 145-1 52). Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 145): ‘si’ and ‘T’ very close together, and distance between distal end and ‘sP approximately equal to distance be- tween ‘sP and ‘rsul’, ratio of distal end to ‘sP: ‘sP to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsuT 5:1:4 (sometimes 4:1:5). ‘Gu’ present, small and inconspicuous; ‘sP dis- tinct peak, directed perpendicular to cheliceral margin, smaller than ‘T’ in both width (63%, 63- 67%) and height (43%, 43-50%). ‘sP close to ‘T’ (separated by 8.5% cheliceral length). ‘T’ large (13.5% cheliceral length), robust peak directed perpendicular to margin of chelicerae. ‘rsu’ 4 (3- 4) straight spikes. Retromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 1 46): Short series of 7 rather large spikes, well separated ‘L3’ and ‘L7’ smallest. Dorsal spur long, curved finger (13.9% length of carapace); tip not bifurcated, although dorsal side projects slightly further forward than ventral (Fig. 147). Cheli- ceral fang approximately same length as base, bent sharply over at proximal, and slightly at distal, ends. Length of cephalothorax 1.7 mm (1.7-1. 8), total length 4.5 mm (Fig. 148). Che- licerae much shorter (66%, 66-68%) than length of carapace. Eyes fairly large, PME separated by approximately width of PME (Fig. 148). Median ocular area wider at back than at front. Lateral eyes contiguous. Legs pigmented under promi- 208 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY nent spines (Figs. 149-150). Femur I: 5 prola- teral, 3 dorsal, no retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 3 (4) prolateral, 2 dorsal, 4 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: no ventral spines. Tibia III: 2 pairs of ventral spines. Carapace with pair of prominent lines in anterior region, converging towards midline. Thoracic fovea marked with circular indentation, tapering to thin line running posteriorly. Border of carapace pigmented. Ab- domen with pigmented margins, running slightly in at midline, and turning into broken pair of markings running posteriorly beyond midline (Fig. 151). Conductor Tip (Figs. 152 and 165): high, rounded cap, terminating in long apical projec- tion drawn laterally outwards and downwards and terminating in very small forward curl. Material Examined. — This species is found in mesic forest only on Kauai Island (Table 1): Mohihi Ditch. 3500 ft (1067 m), 27-III-90 (R.G. Gillespie & C. Par- rish). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was supported by grants from the Hawaii Bishop Research Institute, the Hawaii Natural Area Reserves System and the Nature Conservancy of Hawaii. Additional support was provided by the Bishop Museum, the Nature Conservancy of Hawaii, Haleakala and Hawaii Volcanoes National Parks, the Hawaii Branch of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Zo- ology Department, U.H. Manoa. Helicopter sup- port was provided by Haleakala National Park, Maui Land and Pineapple Company and the Pa- cific Tropical Botanical Gardens. I am deeply indebted to the following for their assistance in collecting specimens: Randy Bartlett, Jeff Bur- gett, Hampton Carson, Ingrid Felger, Janet Gil- lespie, John Halloran, Jim Jacobi, Kenneth Ka- neshiro. Bob Lee, Lloyd Loope, David Lorence, Tod Lum, Art Medeiros, Steve Montgomery, Chris Parrish, Steve Perlman, Bill Perreira, Da- vid Preston, Vince and Barbara Roth, Rob Ry- dell. Bill Stormont, John Strazanac and Mark White. Lee Golf allowed me to use his compound microscope with camera lucida and Kenneth Ka- neshiro his environmentally controlled facilities to maintain and rear live specimens. I am also grateful to the following landowners and prop- erty managers who facilitated access to forest on their property: Monty Richardson (Puu O Umi and Kohala Forest), Jim Kiyabu (Kipahoehoe), Sally Rice (Manuka), Sam Kuboto (Kealakekua), Harry Yamamoto (Castle and Cook, Lanai) and Maui Land and Pineapple Company (West Maui). Thanks also to Sue Monden for making my sketches look attractive, and to Marilyn Dunlap and Tina Carvalho for help with the SEM. Also to Henrietta Croom, Frank Howarth and Ste- phen Palumbi for advice and discussion, and to Jonathan Coddington, Gustavo Hormiga, Herb Levi, Gary Miller, Norman Platnick and George Roderick for careful and meticulous reviews of the first draft. LITERATURE CITED Berger, A. J. 1981. Hawaiian Birdlife. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. Chickering, A. M. 1957. The genus Tetragnatha (Araneae: Argiopidae) in Panama. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 116:302-354. Croom, H. B., R.G. Gillespie, & S.R. Palumbi. 1991. Mitochondrial DNA sequences coding for a portion of the RNA of the small ribosomal subunits of Te- tmgnatha mandibulata and Tetragnatha hawaiensis (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J. Arachnol., 19:21 0-2 1 4. Cooke, C., Montague, J. & Kondo, Y. 1960. Revision of Tornatellinidae and Achatinellidae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata). B.P. Bishop Mus. Bull., 221:1-303. Dabrowska Prot, E. & J. Luczak. 1968a .Spiders and mosquitos of the ecotone alder forest (Carici elon- gatae-alnetum) and oak pine forest {Pino querce- tum). Ekologia Polska Seria A., XVI:46 1-483. Dabrowska Prot, E. & J. Luczak. 1968b. Studies on the incidence of mosquitos in the food of Tetrag- natha montana Simon and its food activity in the natural habitat. Ekologia Polska Seria A., XVI:843- 853. Dabrowska Prot, E., Luczak, J. & Tarwid, K. 1968. Prey and predator density and their reactions in the process of mosquito reduction by spiders in field experiments. Ekologia Polska Seria A., XVI:773- 819. Freed, L. A., Conant, S. and Fleischer, R. C. 1987. Evolutionary ecology and radiation of Hawaiian passerine birds. Trends in Ecol. and Evol., 2:196- 203. Gillespie, R. G. 1986. Between population compar- ison of resource acquisition in the long jawed orb weaving spider Tetragnatha elongata. Ph.D. disser- tation; University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Ten- nessee. Gillespie, R. G. 1987a. The mechanism of habitat selection in the long jawed orb weaving spider Te- tragnatha elongata (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J. Arachnol., 15:81-90. Gillespie, R.G. 1987b. The role ofprey in aggregative behaviour of the long jawed orb weaving spider Te- tragnatha elongata. Anim. Behav., 35:675-681. GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 209 Gillespie, R.G. 1989. Diet induced color change in the Hawaiian happy face Spider Theridion gmllator (Araneae, Theridiidae). J. ArachnoL, 17:171-177. Gillespie, R. G. 1990. Costs and benefits of brood care in the Hawaiian happy face s^iderTheridion gmllator (Araneae, Theridiidae). American. Mid. Nat, 123:236-243. Gillespie, R. G. & B. Tabashnik. 1989. What makes a happy face? Determinants of colour pattern in the Hawaiian happy face spider Theridion grallat or. He- redity, 62:355-363. Gillespie, R. G. & B. Tabashnik. 1990. Maintaining a happy face: Stable colour polymorphism in the spider Theridion grallator (Araneae, Theridiidae). Heredity, 65:67-74. Heliker, C. 1989. The volcanic origin of the Hawaiian Islands. Pp. 1 1-16, In Conservation Biology in Ha- waii. Univ. of Hawaii Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, Honolulu. Gon, S. M. III. 1985. Comparative behavioral ecol- ogy of the spider Theridion grallator Simon (Ara- neae: Theridiidae) in the Hawaiian archipelago. Ph.D. dissertation; U. California at Davis. 322 pp. Kaneshiro, K. Y. & Boake, C. R. B. 1987. Sexual selection and speciation: issues raised by Hawaiian drosophilids. Trends in Ecol. and EvoL, 2:207-2 1 1 . Karsch, F. 1880. Sitzungs-Berichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender freunde zu Berlin. Jahrgang. Sit- zung vom, 18:76-84. Kaston, B. J. 1 948. How to know the spiders. 3rd ed. Wm. C. Brown Co., Dubuque, Iowa. Levi, H. W. 1981. The American orb-weaver genus Dolichognatha and Tetragnatha north of Mexico (Araneae: Araneidae, Tetragnathinae). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard., 149:271-318. Luczak, J. & Dabrowska Prot, E. 1 966. Experimental studies on the reduction of the abundance of mos- quitos by spiders. Bull. Acad. Polonaise Sci., Cl. 2: 14:315-320. Okuma, C. 1987. A revision of the Australasian spe- cies of the genus Tetragnatha (Araneae, Tetrag- nathidae). Esakia, 25:37-96. Okuma, C. 1988a. A revision of the genus Tetrag- natha Latrielle (Araneae, Tetragnathidae) of Asia, Part I., J. Fac. Agr. Kyushu Univ., 32:165-181. Okuma, C. 1988b. A revision of the genus Tetrag- natha Latrielle (Araneae, Tetragnathidae) of Asia, Part I!., J. Fac. Agr. Kyushu Univ., 32:183-213. Okuma, C. 1988c. Redescriptions of the Hawaiian spiders of Tetragnatha described by Simon (Ara- neae, Tetragnathidae). J. Fac. Agr. Kyushu Univ., 33:77-86. Perkins, R. C. L. 1913. Introduction (to Fauna Ha- waiiensis). /«: Fauna Hawaiiensis, Vol. 1: xv- ccxxviii. Ed. D. Sharp. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. Simon, E. 1900. Arachnida: Fauna Hawaiiensis, 2: 443-519, pis. 15-19. Suman, T. W. 1964. Spiders of the Hawaiian Islands: Catalog and Bibliography. Pacific Insects, 6:665- 687. Suman, T. W. 1970. Spiders of the family Thomis- idae in Hawaii. Pacific Insects, 12:773-864. Wiehle, H. 1963. Tetragnathidae. Tierwelt Deutsch- lands., 49: 1-76. Yoshida, M. 1987. Predatory behavior of tha praedonia (Araneae: Tetragnathidae). Acta Ar- achnologica, 35:57-75. Manuscript received March 1991, revised July 1991 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:210-214 MITOCHONDRIAL DNA SEQUENCES CODING EOR A PORTION OF THE RNA OF THE SMALL RIBOSOMAL SUBUNITS OF TETRAGNATHA MANDIBULATA AND TETRAGNATHA HAWAIENSIS {ARANEAE, TETRAGNATHIDAE) Henrietta B. Croom: Department of Biology, The University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee 37375 USA Rosemary G. Gillespie and Stephen R. Palumbi: Department of Zoology, The University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 USA ABSTRACT. A region of mitochondrial DNA coding for most of the third domain of the 12S rRNA of the ribosomal small subunit has been sequenced from two spiders in the genus Tetragnatha (Araneae, Tetrag- nathidae): a circumtropical species T. mandibulata and an endemic Hawaiian species T. hawaiensis. The secondary structure of the spider ribosomal RNA shows strong similarity to that of insects. Across this region, the two Tetragnatha sequences are 22% different. The T. mandibulata sequence is 36% different from the homologous segment in Drosophila yakiiba and 51% different from the same segment in Homo sapiens. The spider sequences are sufficiently variable to be useful in the species in this genus. A powerful approach to studying genetic re- latedness of species involves DNA sequence comparisons which can be used to estimate branching order of phylogenetic trees as well as evolutionary distance between extant taxa (Fel- senstein 1988). Recent application of the poly- merase chain reaction and direct sequencing has accelerated efforts to examine a wide range of taxa with DNA comparisons (Kocher et al. 1 989; Martin et al. 1 990). To date the use of this meth- od in studying spiders has not been reported. Here we describe a procedure we have used to amplify and to determine the sequence of nucle- otidesofa 279-base-pair region of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from two species of the genus Tetragnatha (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). Sequencing DNA has the following advantages over other techniques of genetic comparison; (1) it has greater resolving power over a hierarchical range of intraspecific to intergeneric compari- sons, (2) sequences are easily compared with known sequences from other species, and (3) functional information on products encoded by DNA allows strong inferences on the selective importance of mutations observed, allowing character weighting for sites that are not selec- tively neutral (Kocher et al. 1989). Mitochon- drial DNA was chosen for this work because its matriarchal inheritance and lack of recombina- studying genetic relationships among at least some of tion make it often more instructive than nuclear DNA in comparing taxa (Wilson et al. 1985). This DNA evolves rapidly at the sequence level in arthropods (DeSalle and Templeton 1988; Palumbi and Benzie 1991) and has proven use- ful for comparing recently-evolved taxa in Ha- waii (DeSalle et al. 1987). In order to determine nucleotide sequence in a particular mtDNA segment, the segment must first be amplified either by genetic cloning or by using the polymerase chain reaction (Mullis and Faloona 1987;Saikietal. 1988). The latter meth- od depends upon knowledge of oligonucleotide sequences that flank the segment of interest and that serve as primers for enzymatic amplifica- tion. Kocher et al. (1989) have described uni- versal (highly-conserved) oligonucleotide se- quences flanking a 300-base portion of the third domain of the 1 2S ribosomal RNA gene that can be used to amplify mtDNA from animals as di- verse as humans and invertebrates. The conser- vation of these primers makes them useful to investigators sequencing the DNA of species for which there is no previous sequence information (Simon et al. 1990). We first used insect-specific primers for the 12S rRNA region, slightly mod- ified by C. Simon (pers. comm.) from the original primers of Kocher et al. (1989), to amplify and sequence the DNA of Tetragnatha mandibulata 210 CROOM ET Ah.-TETRAGNATHA MTDNA SEQUENCES 211 Walckenaer. We then designed a spider-specific primer based on this sequence to amplify and sequence the same region from a Hawaiian en- demic species T.hawaiensis Simon. MATERIALS AND METHODS All solutions used were either sterilized or pre- pared using sterile deionized, distilled water, and all glass- and plastic-ware were sterile with the exception of the Centricon tubes (see below). The chelicerae and a front leg of each spider were placed in 70% ethanol as voucher specimens. Total (genomic) DNA was prepared by homog- enizing a single spider in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube in 200 mL of 25 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM EDTA, 2% SDS, and 200 ntg/mL Proteinase K, followed by incubation for 1-2 hr in a water bath at 65 °C. The homogenate was extracted first with phenol, previously-equilibrated with 1 M Tris HCl buffer (pH 7.5), then with 25:24:1 phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol 1 to 4 times (until all the protein-containing white interface was removed), and finally with 24: 1 chloroform/ isoamyl alcohol. One-half volume of a 7.5 M solution of ammonium acetate was added to the extract to achieve a final concentration of 2.5 M and mixed well before adding 2‘/2 volumes of 95% ethyl alcohol and mixing again. This solu- tion was incubated at room temperature for 1 5 min to allow for DNA precipitation. The DNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 1 4,000 x g for 1 5 min at room temperature, washed with 500 mL of 70% ethyl alcohol, dried under a vacuum, and resuspended in 25 mL water. Five ixL of this preparation was electrophoresed on a 0.8% aga- rose gel in Tris-borate buffer and stained with ethidium bromide as described in Sambrook et al. (1989) to ensure that high molecular-weight DNA was present. The preparation is stable in- definitely when stored at -20°C. One /iL of a 1:10 dilution in water of this DNA and 2.5 units of DNA polymerase from Themus aquaticus (Perkin-Elmer Cetus) were incubated in 100 fxL of buffer containing 67 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.8), 3 mM magnesium chloride, 16.7 mM ammonium sulfate, each of four deoxynucleo- side triphosphates at 200 mM , and each of two primers at 1 according to the protocol of Saiki et al. (1988). Thermal profile for 45 cycles was as follows: (1) DNA melting for 1 min at 94 °C, (2) annealing for 1 min at 50 °C, and (3) polymerization for 2 min at 72 °C to amplify the double-stranded sequence. The primers and their location in the Drosophila yakuba mtDNA se- quence of Clary and Wolstenholme ( 1 985), were 12St-L (14503), a Tetragnatha-specific primer designed by H. Croom: 5’-GGTGGCATTT- TATTTTATTAGAGG-3’ and 12Sbi-H (14214), an insect-specific primer designed by C. Simon: 5’-AAGAGCGACGGGCGATGTGT-3’. One mL of the double-stranded product of the first amplification was cycled under the same con- ditions as above except that only one primer was added to the incubation mixture. This produced a single-strand sequencing template, which was processed in a Centricon 30 microconcentrator (Amicon) to concentrate and purify the DNA product. The template was then sequenced by the dideoxy chain termination method of Sanger et al. (1977) as described by Engelke et al. ( 1 988), using the primer that had not been used in the second amplification. DNA from three individ- uals of each species was sequenced in both di- rections, and no intraspecific variation was ob- served. Homologous sequences of DNA from different taxa were aligned to minimize deletions or ad- ditions using software written by S. R. Palumbi and C. Parrish. Pairwise percent differences were calculated by counting only sites where both spe- cies have nucleotides in our aligned sequences. One strand of spider DNA was folded to show its secondary structure using the folded sequenc- es of insects as a guide (Clary and Wolstenholme 1987; Simon et al. 1990). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The DNA sequences from the two Tetragna- tha species were compared with the 12S rRNA genes from both Homo sapiens and Drosophila yakuba (Fig. 1). The two Tetragnatha sequences are 22% different from each other, 36% different from the homologous segment in Drosophila (Clary and Wolstenholme 1985), and 51% dif- ferent from the same segment in Homo (Ander- son et al. 1981). In comparison, the Drosophila and Homo segments differ by 45%. These values are based solely on pairwise nucleotide differ- ences, ignoring insertions and deletions, using the alignments in Fig. 1. It is difficult to align nonconserved regions of DNA from distantly- related groups, so other alignments may yield slightly different percentages. Likewise, the dif- ferenees here are uncorrected for multiple mu- tations at the same site, which has the effect of 212 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Tetragnatha mandibulata aacatgtttattaatcgacattacacgattatttt Tetragnatha hawaiensis .. t ....... a atc .......... c .. . Drosophila yakuba ... c ..... tg ....... t . a . c ..... . ggacc . Homo sapiens . g . c . . . . ctg t . aac . c . . . . c . acc . TACTTTTTTATAA ATTT TAT AT ACCTCCGTCC - - AGAATAAATTTT T AATA TTT C AATA . T G .... TT ..... AAAA .......... AAA . T . GTAATC . G .......... GT .. . TATC . . . . . . TT . . A . A . GA . TAA . AA C. .CACC.CT.GC. .TC.GCC. G. .A. . TTC . . C . A . CCC . GA . G . AGGCTACA TATTCAAAATAATATTATAATAATTTA GGTAAAGGTGTAGACTTTAAATTAGT -TT AT . . C . . GA . . . . . . A . . . A . . T . AG . . A . . A T.-.T.T.A....A...... TATC A .A.C. CT.A. .TT.A. . . .AA A . G . A . GCGC . . GTACCC . CGT . AAG . CGTTA . . . C C . CA . G . GG . G . CAAG AAATGTGTTACATTAAAAATTATTT AAGAATTATTTTTTATAA CAATATATGA ...... A ... AA ........... G ... . AAC . AA . C . T . . . . AGT . T . . A . . T .... G ...... A .... -T ... ACGGATAAAA . . . . G . AA . . A . . . T . T . . . G.C. . . . . . TTCT . CCCCAGAAAACTACGA . . GCCC . . . .G.AACTT. . GGGTC . . AAGAGGATTTATAAGCTACTTTTTAATTAAAATTTTAACTTGAATTAAAAA--TAAATGCG .. A .............. . TAA . . . T A ... T ...... . TA . G . T GGT . . TA . AA . . . TAA. G . T . AA ... T ....... TT . GCTC .... ATAT . G . T GC . . TA . AC . A- AG .G. .G.G.GC.T.G. . . . .-C. GGGCCC . G . . GCGC Figure 1.— Comparison of Mitochondrial 12S Ribosomal DNA from Tetragnatha mandibulata, Tetragnatha hawaiensis. Homo sapiens, and Drosophila yakuba. Dots represent positions that are identical to the top sequence, and dashes represent gaps in the sequences required to maximize alignment. The sequence from the Drosophila is that of Clary and Wolstenholme (1985) between their base pairs 14236 and 14502. The Homo DNA sequence is that of Anderson et al. (1981) between their bases 1201 and 1475. making the more distantly-related taxa appear deceptively similar. When using the polymerase chain reaction with genomic DNA, one must always consider the possibility that nontarget nuclear or mitochon- drial DNA has been amplified. Using the method of Palumbi and Wilson (1990), we separated mtDNA from nuclear DNA of 25 specimens of T. mandibulata on a cesium chloride gradient before amplifying and sequencing the mtDNA fraction. The sequence obtained was identical to that in Fig. 1. In order to verify that the spider sequences code for the third domain of 1 2S rRNA, a single strand was folded to generate the sec- ondary structure stabilized by hydrogen-bonding between complementary bases. In all of the taxa studied to date (Dams et al. 1988; Simon et al. 1990), the folded structure of this domain forms helical paired stems and unpaired loops. The structure obtained from T. mandibulata (Fig. 2) is essentially the same as those of the other known taxa. Conservation of secondary structure, de- spite the large overall sequence differences among taxa (Fig. 1), suggests we have sequenced a func- tional ribosomal gene. The third domain of the small rRNA encoded by nuclear DNA is both larger than, and has a structure distinct from, that represented in Fig. 2 (Woese et al. 1983; Dams et al. 1988). We have sequenced most of the homologous region from 1 9 other spiders: Aphonopelma chal- codes Chamberlin (Araneae, Theraphosidae), Doryonychus raptor Simon (Araneae, Tetrag- nathidae), and 17 endemic Hawaiian Tetrag- natha taxa. In the case of the A. chalcodes, cesium chloride gradient purified mtDNA was used for the amplification instead of genomic DNA. We found each of these sequences to be more similar to the spider sequences in Fig. 1 than to those of any other known taxa (Croom and Palumbi, un- published). Such similarity suggests that neither of the sequences reported in this paper is from contaminating DNA. Interestingly, 83% of all bases in the two Te- tragnatha sequences are either A or T. In the strand shown in Fig. 2, the frequencies for bases are: 39% A, 43% T, 8% C, 10% G. The percent AT across this region is 79% for Drosophila and CROOM ET AL.-TETRAGNATHA MTDNA SEQUENCES 213 C C G - C C - G Figure 2. — Mitochondrial DNA of Tetragnatha mandibulata folded to show the secondary structure of the third domain of 12S ribosomal RNA for which it codes. Dashes represent hydrogen bonds between A and T or C and G, and dots represent the weaker hy- drogen bonds between T and G. The portion of the sequence between the asterisks * is that of the primer 12St-L. Folding was based on the structure of Simon et al. (1990). 53% for Homo. This is consistent with the ob- servation that all known arthropods have high AT content in this domain (Simon 1991). The third domain of rRNA is highly conserved across many taxa (Kocher et al. 1989). Hence, the large difference (22%) between these two Te- tragnatha species is surprising but not without precedent. Palumbi and Benzie (1991) have found similar percent diversity in the homologous mtDNA region among species of shrimp in the genus Penaeus. In addition, we have found 3- 1 3% variation in the homologous DNA from 1 8 different endemic Hawaiian tetragnathids that appear (on morphological grounds) to have been derived from a single introduction to the islands (Gillespie, unpublished). Such high diversities imply that these species have either diverged for a long period or that their sequences have di- verged at a rapid rate. We are currently using these sequences, as well as those coding for mi- tochondrial proteins, to conduct systematic anal- ysis of this group which has undergone explosive radiation (Gillespie, in press) in the Hawaiian archipelago. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Bailey Kessing, Chris Parrish, Chris- tine Simon, and Rob deSalle for their help and encouragement during this study. Lei-Anna Willman provided excellent technical assistance. This research was supported by NSF grant BSR- 8604969 and by the Faculty Research and Fac- ulty Development Funds of The University of the South. LITERATURE CITED Anderson, S., A. Bankier, B. G. Barrell, M. H. L. deBruijn, A. R. Coulson, J. Drouin, I. C. Eperon, D. P. Nierlich, B. A. Roe, F. Sanger, P. H. Schreier, A. J. H. Smith, K. R. Stader & I. G. Young. 1981. Sequence and organization of the human mito- chondrial genome. Nature, 290:457^65. Clary, D. O. & D. R. Wolstenholme. 1985. The mi- tochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. J. Mol. Evol., 22:252-271. Clary, D. O. & D. R. Wolstenholme. 1987. Dro- sophila mitochondrial DNA: conserved sequence in the A-l-T rich region and supporting evidence for a secondary structure model of the small ribosomal RNA. J. Mol. Evol., 25:1 16-125. Dams, E., L. Hendriks, Y. Van de Peer, J-M. Neefs, G. Smits & G. Vandenkempt. 1988. Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 16 supl.:r87-rl73. DeSalle, R., T. Freedman, E. M. Prager, & A. C. Wil- son. 1987. Tempo and mode of sequence evolu- tion in mitochondrial DNA of Hawaiian Drosoph- ila. J. Mol. Evol., 26:157-164. DeSalle, R.& A. R. Templeton. 1988. Founder effects and the rate of mitochondrial DNA evolution in Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution, 42:1076-1084. Engelke, D. R., P. A. Hoener & F. D. Collins. 1988. Direct sequencing of enzymatically-amplified hu- man genomic DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85:544-548. Felsenstein, J. 1988. Phylogenies from molecular se- quences: inference and reliability. Ann. Rev. Gen., 22:521-565. Gillespie, R. G. 1991. Hawaiian spiders of the genus Tetragnatha: I. Spiny leg clade. J. Arachnol., 19: 174-209. Kocher, T. D., W. K. Thomas, A. Meyer, S. V. Ed- wards, S. Paabo, F. X. Villablanca & A. C. Wilson. 1989. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: Amplification and sequencing with con- served primers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86:6 196- 6200. Martin, A. P., B. D. Kessing, & S. R. Palumbi. 1990. The accuracy of estimating genetic distance between species from short sequences of mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Biol. Evol., 7:485-488. 214 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Mullis, K. B. & F. A. Faloona. 1987. Specific syn- thesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase catalyzed chain reaction. Methods in Enzymology, 155:335- 350. Palumbi, S. R. & J. Benzie, in press. Large mito- chondrial DNA differences between morphologi- cally similar penaeid shrimp. Mol. Marine Biol. Bio- technol. Palumbi, S. R. & A. C. Wilson. 1990. Mitochondrial DNA diversity in the sea urchins Strongylocentrotus purpuratus and S. dwebachiensis. Evolution, 44:403- 415. Saiki, R., D. Gelfand, S. Stoffel, S. Scharf, R. Higuchi, G. Horn, K. Mullis & H. A. Erlich. 1988. Primer- directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science, 239:489- 491. Sambrook, J., T. Fritsch, & T. Maniatis. 1989. Aga- rose gel electrophoresis. Pp. 6.2-6.18, In Molecular Cloning, Second edition, Vol. 1 . Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. Sanger, F., S. Nicklen, & A. R. Coulsen. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 74:5463-5467. Simon, C. in press. Molecular systematics at the spe- cies boundary: Exploiting conserved and variable regions of the mitochondrial genome of animals via direct sequencing from amplified DNA. In: Molec- ular Taxonomy, NATO Advanced Studies Institute. (Godfrey M. Hewitt., ed.). Springer Verlag, Berlin. Simon, C., S. Paabo, T. D., Kocher, & A. C. Wilson. 1990. Evolution of mitochondrial ribosomal RNA in insects as shown by the polymerase chain reac- tion. Pp. 235-244, In: Molecular Evolution, U.C.L.A. Symposia on Molecular and Cellular Bi- ology, New Series, Vol. 122. (M. Clegg & S. Clark, eds.). Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York. Wilson, A.C., R. L. Cann, S. M. Carr, M. George, U. B. Gyllensten, K. M. Helm-Bychowski, R. G. Hig- uchi, S. R. Palumbi, E. M. Prager, R. D. Sage & M. Stoneking. 1985. Mitochondrial DNA and two perspectives on evolutionary genetics. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 26:375-400. Woese, C. R., R. Gutell, R. Gupta & H. F. Noller. 1983. Detailed analysis of the higher-order struc- ture of 16S-like ribosomal ribonucleic acids. Mi- crobiol. Revs., 47:621-669. Manuscript received November 1990. revised July 1991 . 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:215-224 SEGMENTAL ANOMALIES IN RONCUS AFF. LUBRICUS (NEOBISIIDAE, PSEUDOSCORPIONES) FROM YUGOSLAVIA B. P. M. Curcic, R. N. Dimitrijevic, O. S. Karamata, and L. R. Lucic: Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Belgrade, 16, Studentski Trg, YU-11000 Beograd, Yugoslavia. ABSTRACT. Malformations in the abdominal segmentation patterns were studied in two pseudoscorpion species of the genus Roncus L. Koch, inhabiting Yugoslavia. A total of 36 abnormal examples were found out of 4,825 specimens examined. All anomalous pseudoscorpions were dissected and subjected to the pathomor- phological analysis. The frequency of the aberrant specimens was variable, depending on the locality, growth stage, sex, and species. The following malformations were noted: hemimery; partial atrophy (single and multiple); symphysomery (single and multiple); and combinations of different anomalies (combined hemimery and sclerite enlargement; combined hemimery and symphysomery; combined partial atrophy and symphysomery; combined partial atrophy and sclerite enlargement; combined atrophy or hemimery, symphysomery and sclerite enlarge- ment; combined atrophy, symphysomery, helicomery and sclerite enlargement; and combined atrophy, heli- comery and sclerite enlargement). Teratological variation of the abdominal sclerites has been confined mostly to adults and, to a lesser degree, to tritonymphs. In addition, some specific features of the relative distribution of various segmental deficiencies are considered. Finally, the probable causes of the genesis and development of segmental anomalies in the pseudoscorpions studied have been also discussed. Developmental anomalies are known to occur in pseudoscorpions, the most common being the malformations of various abdominal sclerites (Legg and Jones 1988; Curcic 1989a, b). Aber- rations may be produced internally or externally, the latter being induced mechanically, chemi- cally or physically. Internally induced aberra- tions occur during development (including the molting period). These malformations were first noted by With (1905), Kastner (1927) and Hadzi (1937), and later classified by Gilbert (1952) and Pedder ( 1 965). More recently, Curcic (1980,1 988, 1989a, b), Curcic and Dimitrijevic (1982, 1984, 1986), Curcic et al. (1981, 1983), and Dimitri- jevic (1985, 1990) have provided further ex- amples and attempted to quantify the phenom- enon. In the majority of the species studied, the de- formities of the abdominal sclerites were con- fined to the tritonymph/adult, or maturation molt. Aberrations were thought to represent post- embryonic molt phenomena (Pedder 1965) but their origin and development are still not suffi- ciently understood at this moment. In Neobisium carpaticum Beier, Curcic (1989a, b) and Curcic and Dimitrijevic ( 1 982) found a teratological in- cidence of 1.4% out of 1,300 specimens exam- ined; and in N. sylvaticum (C. L. Koch) the in- cidence was 2%. The majority of deficiencies occurred at the maturation molt and were con- fined mostly to males. Teratological deformities, although not entire- ly restricted to individuals undergoing the mat- uration molt, occur most commonly at that time. Such variations include alterations of segmen- tation and change in structure of appendages (Weygoldt 1969), tergal/stemal abnormalities, variation in surface sculpturing and setal and tri- chobothrial distribution patterns. In some cases the abnormalities found in adults represent the retention of tritonymphal features, or localized neoteny (Gupta 1979;Gabbuttand Vachon 1963; Weygoldt 1969). It is supposed that a slight dis- ruption of the neurosecretory and endocrine sys- tem or local variations in the interpretation of the neurosecretions could lead to localized ter- atological abnormalities. Among the Cheliferinea, abdominal malfor- mations have been described in Ellingsenius sculpturatus (Lewis), Anatemnus javanus (Tho- rell), Dactylochelifer latreillei (Leach), Synsphy- ronus mimetus Chamberlin, Homs granulatus (Ellingsen), Allochernes widen (C. L. Koch), Lamprochernes nodosus (Schrank) and Alloch- ernes dubius (O. P.-Cambridge) (With 1905; Hadzi 1930; Gilbert 1952; Chamberlin 1949; Beier 1955; Weygoldt 1969; Pedder 1965). In the Chthoniinea, a number of segmental 215 216 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY anomalies have been recorded from Chthonius tenuis (L. Koch), C. aff. tetrachelatus (Preyssler) and C. ischnocheles (Hermann) (Pedder 1965; Dimitrijevic 1990). Among the Neobisiinea, false scorpions have been found with segmentation deficiencies in- volving the dorsal and ventral sclerites. Such ab- errations have been noted in Neobisium erythro- dactylum (L. Koch), N. maritimum (Leach) and N. muscorum (Leach)(Pedder 1965). Only re- cently, comparative aspects of teratological vari- ation have been studied in other neobisiid spe- cies: N. carpaticum, N. macrodactylum (Daday), N. cephalonicum (Daday), N. sylvaticum, N. fus- cimamim (C. L. Koch) (Curcic 1980; Curcic and Dimitrijevic 1982, 1984, 1985, 1986; Curcic et al. 1983), N. bernardi Vachon and N. simoni (L. Koch)(Dimitrijevic 1990). These studies have revealed the heterogeneity of segmental anom- alies affecting abdominal sclerites. Such varia- tions include fusion, splitting and loss of tergites and stemites. In addition, different combinations of these anomalies may be present in a single pseudoscorpion specimen (Curcic 1989a, b). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of dif- ferent samples of the genus Roncus L. Koch re- vealed aberrations (anomalies) in the chelicerae, pedipalps and abdomen but not in the walking legs and the cephalothorax. Thus in R. lubricus L. Koch, 1873, from Mt. Avala, near Belgrade, Yugoslavia two or three teeth often grow (fuse) together on both fingers of the pedipalpal chelae. Furthermore, Curcic (1980) noted an anomaly in the sclerite segmentation, which was mani- fested in the fusion of tergites III-VI on each side and in partial fusion of tergites VIII and IX of the same specimen. Similar cases of sternal anomalies have been recorded in the same spe- cies by Curcic and Dimitrijevic (1984), where the phenomena of sclerite fusion (symphyso- mery), atrophy and enlargement have been not- ed. As a consequence of these anomalies, some parts of the aberrant stemites lack its normal setae. Out of four other aberrant specimens (males and females)(Curcic and Dimitrijevic 1984; Dimitrijevic 1985), multiple tergal atrophy was noticed in three specimens, while symphysomery was observed in only one specimen. The atrophy occurred on both anterior and posterior tergites and symphysomery on more posterior tergites. The percentage of aberrant specimens from these samples ranged from 0.46% to 0.95% (Curcic and Dimitrijevic 1986; Dimitrijevic 1985). Curcic and Dimitrijevic ( 1 988) provided further evidence of sclerite anomalies in R. lubricus from Mt. Avala II. In the sample studied, different abdominal malformations were found in 0.67% of all spec- imens, the ratio of aberrant males to females being 4: 1 . The following anomalies were noted: partial atrophy, hemimery, (single) symphyso- mery, and a combination of partial atrophy and tergite enlargement (Curcic 1989b). As a con- sequence of these aberrations, setal counts and disposition were altered. Anomalies in different body structures have also been observed in some cavemicolous spe- cies of Roncus inhabiting underground habitats of the Dinaric Karst (Curcic 1988). Thus, in a male of R. pripegala Curcic, the trichobothri- otaxy of one movable chelal finger was altered (5 trichobothria instead of 4). In another pseu- doscorpion, R. aff. stussineri (Simon), a sym- physomery of stemites VII and VIII was found, while in R. timacensis Curcic and R. remesi- anensis Curcic, there were also aberrations in the structure of the chelicerae, in the cheliceral se- tation, and in the structure of the chelal teeth (Curcic 1983). The primary purpose of this study was to an- alyze the quantitative and qualitative variations of abdominal anomalies in two Yugoslavian spe- cies of Roncus pseudoscorpions, their frequen- cies, common occurrences, and the possible fac- tors affecting their development and distribution. MATERIAL AND METHODS We have analyzed the accidental and terato- logical variation of abdominal deficiencies in a population sample of R. aff. lubricus (sample A) from the village of Obrez, near Belgrade, Yu- goslavia, as well as in samples of R. aff. lubricus (sample B) from the village of Asanovac and from the village of Dubova (Ravniste), both near Zitoradja, Yugoslavia. The numbers of speci- mens collected in these localities are presented in Table 2. Samples of the two pseudoscorpion species studied were obtained by sifting oak leaf litter and humus over a period from April 1989 to September 1990 (Obrez sample) and from Jan- uary 1989 to May 1989 (Asanovac and Dubova samples). Samples were taken once a month at each of the two localities. After dissection, all specimens were mounted in gum chloral medium (Swan’s fluid) and ex- amined carefully. The terminology for segmental anomalies in this study is the same as used for other arthropods (Balazuc 1948, 1967). This ter- CURCIC ET AL.-SEGMENTAL ANOMALIES IN RONCUS 217 Table 1. — Frequency of different anomalies in Roncus aff. lubricus (A) and (B) (expressed as a percentage of the total number of anomalies noted in each particular species sample). OBR = Obrez, ASA = Asanovac, DUB = Dubova. Species/locality Segmental anomaly (A) OBR (B) ASA (B) DUB Hemimery 4 - - Partial atrophy single — 17 28 multiple 4 — — Symphysomery single 21 — 44 multiple 4 — — Combined hemimery and sclerite enlargement 25 49 28 Combined hemimery and symphysomery — 17 — Combined partial atrophy and symphysomery 8 — — Combined partial atrophy and sclerite enlargement 13 — — Combined (single or multiple) symphysomery and sclerite enlargement — 17 — Combined atrophy (or hemimery), symphysomery and sclerite enlargement 13 — — Combined atrophy, symphysomery, helicomery and sclerite enlargement 4 — — Combined atrophy, helicomery and sclerite enlargement 4 - - Total 100 100 100 minology has been somewhat modified by (Zurcic and Dimitrijevic (1986) and Curcic (1989a, b) to include the whole range of sternal and tergal deficiencies which were observed in pseudoscor- pions. The false scorpions analyzed for the present study belong to the R. lubricus species complex. The two samples (A and B) are close to R. lu- bricus [see Gardini (1983) for description of the male lectotype from the United Kingdom] but differ both from lubricus (sensu stricto) and from each other in many important respects. It there- fore seems that they belong to two new, previ- ously undescribed specific taxa. Since their pre- cise taxonomic status is considered elsewhere (Curcic, Dimitrijevic & Karamata, in prep.) these two relevant species have been designated as R. aff. lubricus (A) and (B). A chi-square test was used to verify the assumption of the possible sex- linked inheritance of the abdominal deficiencies in the analyzed species. RESULTS There was a total of 36 abnormal specimens [23 of R. aff. lubricus (A) and 13 of R. aff. lu- bricus (B)] (Table 3). Analysis of teratological variation of segmental anomalies in the pseu- doscorpions studied gave the following results; Roncus aff lubricus (A) Table 2.— The number of specimens of Roncus aff. lubricus (A) and (B) (by sex and growth stages) collected from various sites. M = males, F = females, T = tritonymphs, D = deutonymphs, P = protonymphs, OBR = Obrez, ASA = Asanovac, DUB = Dubova. Sex/instar Species Site M F T D P Total R. aff. lubricus (A) OBR 1335 832 883 34 3084 R. aff lubricus (B) ASA 512 433 237 — — 1182 R. aff. lubricus (B) DUB 242 225 91 1 — 559 Total 2089 1490 1211 35 - 4825 218 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures \-l .—Roncusa^. !ubricus{A) from Obrez, near Belgrade, Yugoslavia. Scale line = 0.5 mm. 1. - tergites I-IV, female; 2. - tergites I-III, female; 3.- tergites II-IV, female; 4. - tergites I-IV, female; 5. - tergites I-IV, female; 6. - tergites I-IV, female; 7. - tergites VIII-XI, female. Village of Obrez. - Female (Fig. 1). A section of tergite III is missing on the left. As a conse- quence, the left parts of tergites II and IV are enlarged to fill the missing part of tergite III; the setation of this tergite is altered. Hemimery and tergite enlargement. Female (Fig. 2). The left part of tergite II is completely missing, and the setae are unequally distributed. Hemimery. Female (Fig. 3). The right part of tergite III is fused with the anterior mid-region of tergite IV. A small section of tergite III is present on the left. The number and disposition of setae on ter- gite III are altered as a consequence of this anom- aly. Partial helicomery, atrophy and tergite en- largement. Female (Fig. 4). A small part of tergite III is missing on the left. Tergite II is enlarged and fills the space where the missing part of tergite III would otherwise be found. The setae on tergite II are almost all missing, and their position on tergites III and IV is changed. Atrophy and ter- gite enlargement. Female (Fig. 5). Right part of tergite III is fused with tergite IV medially. A small part of tergite III is isolated on the left and the median region of this tergite lacks setae. Partial atrophy and symphysomery. Female (Fig. 6). The left part of tergite III is missing, and the remaining part of this sclerite is fused with the mid-anterior region of tergite IV. Tergites II and IV are enlarged to fill the space left vacant in tergite III. The setae on tergite III are missing in part. Atrophy (possibly hemi- mery), symphysomery and tergite enlargement. Female (Fig. 7). Tergite X is reduced on the right, and its number of setae is smaller than in normal specimens. The right posterior and lat- eral part of tergite IX is enlarged to fill part of the space where the missing part of tergite X would otherwise be found. Hemimery and tergite enlargement. Female (Fig. 8). Tergite VI is fused with tergite VII medially. As a result of this anomaly, the disposition of setae on tergite VI is altered. Sym- physomery. Female (Fig. 9). The mid-anterior part of ter- gite VIII is lacking. The posterior border of the preceding tergite is slightly enlarged posteriorly. Partial atrophy and tergite enlargement. Female (Fig. 10). Tergites VII and VIII are fused on the left; in addition, a small part of tergite VIII is missing on the left. Partial atrophy and symphysomery. Male (Fig. 1 1). Tergites III and IV are fused medially and on the right. A small isolated sec- tion of tergite III with 3 setae is present on the right. The mid-region of tergite III is devoid of setae. In addition, tergite 11 is slightly enlarged posteriorly. Symphysomery, atrophy and tergite enlargement. Male (Fig. 12). The left part of tergite IV is missing, and the following tergite is enlarged on the left to fill the space left vacant by tergite IV, hence the irregular setation on tergites IV and V. Hemimery and tergite enlargement. CURCIC ET AL.- SEGMENTAL ANOMALIES IN RONCUS 219 Figures S-IO. —Roncus aff. lubricus (A), from Obrez, near Belgrade, Yugoslavia. Scale line = 0.5 mm. 8. - tergites V-VII, female; 9. - tergites VII,VIIL female; 10. - tergites VI-VIII, female. Male (Fig. 13). The abnormalities affect five tergites. First, tergite II is atrophied on the left and tergite III is enlarged to fill the space where the missing part of tergite II would otherwise be found. Second, tergites IV-VI are fused on the left. As a result of this anomaly, the number of setae on tergites II-V is reduced, and their dis- tribution is altered when compared with normal specimens. Atrophy, hemimery, tergite enlarge- ment and multiple symphysomery. Male (Fig. 14). The right part of tergite II is completely lacking, and the setae are unequally distributed. Tergite III is enlarged to fill the space left vacant in tergite II. Hemimery and tergite enlargement. Male (Fig. 1 5). Tergites II and III are fused on the left, hence the irregular setation of tergite II. Symphysomery. Male (Fig. 1 6). The malformations affect three tergites.The mid-region and right part of tergite VI are weakly sclerotized, and its distribution of setae is irregular (two setal rows on the right part of the sclerite). Furthermore, small sections of tergite VII (on the left) and tergite VIII (on the anterior border) are missing. Multiple (partial) atrophy. Male (Fig. 1 7). Tergites VII and VIII are fused on the left, hence the irregular distribution of setae on tergite VII. Symphysomery. Male (Fig. 18). Tergites VIII and IX are fused together. In addition, small parts of tergites VIII and IX are missing on the right, hence the irreg- ular setation on tergites VII-IX. Partial atrophy and symphysomery. Female (Fig. 19). Part of stemite VIII is com- pletely absent. Stemite IX is enlarged on the left and fills the space where the missing part of ster- nite VIII would otherwise be developed. The se- tae on the remaining part of stemite VIII are missing, and their position is altered in relation to normal specimens. Hemimery and stemite en- largement. Male (Fig. 20). Stemites VIII and IX are fused from the midline to the right side; hence, the setae are missing on the right part of stemite VIII. Symphysomery. tl t3 Figures 1 1-17 .—Roncus aff. lubricus (A), from Obrez, near Belgrade, Yugoslavia. Scale line = 0.5 mm. 1 1.- tergites I-IV, male; 12. - tergites I-V, male; 13. - tergites I-VI, male; 14. - tergites I-III, male; 15. - tergites I- III, male; 16. - tergites V-VIII, male; 17. - tergites VI-VIII, male. 220 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures \8-23. — Roncus aff. lubricus (A), from Obrez, near Belgrade, Yugoslavia. Scale line = 0.5 mm. 18. - tergites VI-IX, male; 19. - sternites VI-IX, female; 20. - stemites VII-IX, male; 21. - tergites II-IV, tritonymph; 22. - tergites V-VIII, tritonymph; 23. - tergites IV-X, tritonymph. Tritonymph (Fig. 21). Tergites III and IV are almost completely fused. As a result of this mal- formation, the setation of tergite III is altered (the mid-region of this sclerite is devoid of setae). Symphysomery. Tritonymph (Fig. 22). The posterior mid-re- gion of tergite VI is atrophied; hence, the setae are missing in this area. In addition, tergite VII is enlarged anteriorly to fill the space left vacant by the tergite VI. Partial atrophy and tergite en- largement. Tritonymph (Fig. 23). The tergal anomalies affect six tergites. Tergites V and VI are fused in the middle and on the left; tergites VII and VIII are fused on the right, as are tergites IX and X. As a consequence, the mid-regions of tergites VI and VII lack setae. Multiple symphysomery. Roncus aff. lubricus (B) Village of Asanovac. - Female (Fig. 24). In this specimen, right sclerite halves are missing on tergites II and III. The right anterior part of ter- 24. - tergites I-IV, female; 25. 28.- tergites VI-X, male; 29. - lubricus (B), from Asanovac, near Zitoradja, Yugoslavia. Scale line = 0.5 mm. - tergites V-VII, female; 26. - tergites VII, VIII, male; 27. - tergites II-V, male; tergites V-VIII, male; 30. - tergites V-XI, male. CURCIC ET AL. -SEGMENTAL ANOMALIES IN RONCUS 221 Figures 31-31 .—Ronciis aff. lubricus (B), from Dubova, near Zitoradja, Yugoslavia. Scale line = 0.5 mm. 31. - tergites IX-XI, female; 32. - stemites VIII, IX, female; 33. - tergites VII-IX, female; 34. - tergites V,VI, female; 35.- tergites I-IV, male; 36. - tergites IV-VII, tritonymph; 37. - tergites IV-VI, tritonymph. gite IV is enlarged to fill part of the space left vacant in tergites II and III. Multiple hemimery and tergite enlargement. Female (Fig. 25). Tergite VII is reduced in size in its anterior part on the right; hence, tergite VI is slightly enlarged posteriorly to fill the space where the missing part of tergite VII would oth- erwise be found. Partial atrophy and tergite en- largement. Male (Fig. 26). The small anterior part of ter- gite VIII is missing. Partial atrophy. Male (Fig. 27). Right part of tergite IV is miss- ing. Tergites III and V are enlarged and fill the space where the missing part of tergite IV would otherwise be found. Hemimery and tergite en- largement. Male (Fig. 28). Left part of tergite IX is miss- ing. Tergites VII and VIII are fused on the right. As a consequence of these anomalies, the distri- bution of setae on tergites VII-IX is altered in relation to normal individuals. Hemimery and symphysomery. Male (Fig. 29). The left half of tergite VII is missing. Tergite VI is enlarged posteriorly, and tergite VIII is enlarged anteriorly. Hemimery and tergite enlargement. Male (Fig. 30). The tergal anomalies affect six tergites. Tergites VII-XI are fused (tergites VII- IX on the left and tergites IX-XI on the right). In addition, tergite VI is enlarged posteriorly on the left. As a consequence of these anomalies, the setation of tergites VII-XI is drastically al- tered. Tergite enlargement and multiple sym- physomery. Village of Dubova (Ravniste) - Female (Fig. 31). Tergites X and XI are fused on the right. The distribution of setae on tergite X is altered (symphysomery). The mid-anterior part of ster- nite IX is also missing (Fig. 32; partial atrophy). Female (Fig. 33). A deficiency is found in ter- gite VIII as manifested by the absence of the left part. The adjacent region of tergite IX is enlarged and partially fills the gap left by the missing half of tergite VIII. Hemimery and tergite enlarge- ment. Female (Fig. 34). Part of tergite VI on the right is missing. Partial atrophy. Male (Fig. 35). The right parts of tergites II and III are missing. The adjacent part of tergite IV is enlarged anteriorly to fill part of the space left vacant in tergites II and III. The number and disposition of setae on tergites II and III are al- tered. Multiple hemimery and tergite enlarge- ment. Tritonymph (Fig. 36). Tergites VI and VII are fused on the right, hence the unequal distribution of tergal setae. Symphysomery. Tritonymph (Fig. 37). Tergites V and VI are fused on the left. As a consequence of this anom- aly, the distribution and number of setae are changed in relation to normal specimens (Zlat- kovic 1989). An isolated seta is present on the left side of tergite V. Symphysomery. The numbers of anomalies of males and fe- males of R. aff. lubricus (A) and (B) were not significantly different (x^ test, P >.05) for any of the three locations. Thus, these data offer no confirmation that a sex-linked inheritance of ab- dominal deficiencies exists in the analyzed spe- cies. Comparison of the teratological variation in the analyzed species of Roncus clearly showed that this phenomenon was particularly marked in R. aff. lubricus (A) (Table 1), less so in R. aff 222 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 3.— Abdominal abnormalities in different sexes and growth stages of Roncus aff. lubricus (A) and (B) from three sites. M = males, F = females, T = tritonymphs, D = deutonymphs, P = protonymphs, OBR = Obrez, ASA = Asanovac, DUB = Dubova. Species Site Sex/instar % abnormal males % abnormal specimens M F T D P Total R. aff. lubricus (A) OBR 9 1 1 3 — 23 39.3 0.7 R. aff. lubricus (B) ASA 5 2 — — — 7 71.4 0.6 R. aff. lubricus (B) DUB 1 3 2 - 6 16.7 1.1 Total 15 16 5 — 36 Mean 42.4 0.8 lubricus (B) from Asanovac, and the least in R. aff. lubricus (B) from Dubova (Table 1) and R. lubricus (Curcic 1989b, see Table 5). Such obvi- ous differences, or the different degrees of tera- tological variation, may be due to different fre- quencies of some segmental anomallies or sample sizes (i.e., too small to give a detailed picture of the whole range of teratological variability of the species). Another explanation for the unequal variation of teratological phenomena might be the different susceptibility of various pseudo- scorpion populations to the factors which cause malformations. That both assumptions may be correct is further supported by the similar un- equal frequency of different anomalies in other genera and species of the Neobisiidae, and par- ticularly of the species of the genus Neobisium (Curcic 1989a, b). DISCUSSION Postembryonic instars of each species were found in each of the localities (Table 2), with the absence of protonymphs of R. aff. lubricus (A) from Obrez and Dubova, and deutonymphs and protonymphs of R. aff. lubricus (B) from Asa- novac. In the more frequently occurring species, R. aff. lubricus (A), 23 abnormal specimens were noted (Table 3), while in R. aff. lubricus (B), the numbers of aberrant examples in different sam- ples ranged from six to seven (Table 3). The ma- jority of abnormal specimens were adults, with the exception of three tritonymphs of R. aff. lu- bricus (A) and two tritonymphs of R. aff. lubricus (B)(Table 3). In R. aff. lubricus (A) from Obrez we found that the frequency of anomalies of the abdominal sclerites is 0.7%, whereas in R. aff. lubricus (B) it varies from 0.6% to 1.1%, depending on the site. In general these values correspond to the frequency of anomalies in R. lubricus from other sites, as noticed elsewhere by Curcic (1989b). The highest percentage of these aberrations has been noted in the sample of R. aff. lubricus (B) from Dubova, and the lowest in the sample of the same species from Asanovac. It is pertinent to note that the frequency of segmental anom- alies in R. aff. lubricus (A) and (B) is essentially similar in different populations. The analysis of the samples of R. aff. lubricus (A) and (B) showed that teratological variation of the abdominal sclerites was confined mostly to adults [86.9% in R. aff. lubricus (A), and from 66.6% to 100% in R. aff. lubricus (B)]. The deficiencies in abdominal sclerites of the species studied were variable. Thus, in R. aff. lubricus (A) as many as 1 1 different single or combined anomalies were noted. However, in R. aff. lubricus (B) from Asanovac only four types of aberrations were found, while in the same spe- cies from Dubova we noted the existence of three kinds of malformations. Among the reasons for the unequal distribution of anomalies in different samples might be the inappropriate sample size or the unequal susceptibility to the factors caus- ing such aberrations. The analysis of the samples of R. aff. lubricus (A) and (B) revealed that malformations of ab- dominal sclerites are confined mainly to adults. It is also evident that tergal anomalies are more frequent than those affecting the stemites. The sex-linked distribution of segmental anomalies varies considerably, depending on the sample studied. Thus, in R. aff. lubricus (A) only 39.3% of males were aberrant; in R. aff. lubricus (B) , however, the percentage of abnormal males varied from only 16.7% (Dubova) to as high as 7 1 .4% (Asanovac). However, Curcic ( 1 989b) re- ported an incidence of 80.0% of aberrant males CURCIC ET AL.- SEGMENTAL ANOMALIES IN RONCUS 223 in R. lubricus, and 50-100% aberrant males in different species of Neobisiurn (with the sole ex- ception of N. sylvaticum, where the frequency of abnormal males was only 16.7%). One possible explanation is that the genesis of abdominal de- ficiencies is connected either with male- or fe- male-linked inheritance, as noted elsewhere by Curcic and Dimitrijevic (1985, 1986). The study of the relative distribution of seg- mental anomalies in the adult and tritonymph stages of R. aff lubricus (A) and (B), as compared to the same feature in different species of Neo- bisium and Roncus (Curcic 1989a, b) revealed the following; (1) hemimery, if present, is re- stricted to the anterior part of the abdomen, (2) atrophy is found mostly in the anterior abdom- inal region, although it may occur also in the posterior region, as already noticed by Curcic (1989b), (3) symphysomery develops in the an- terior, median and posterior sclerites, whereas in Neobisiurn it was noted that this malformation is present mainly in the central region of the abdomen (Curcic 1989b), (4) the relative posi- tion of sclerite enlargement is often correlated with the presence and relative position of partial atrophy or hemimery. Hence, the combination of these anomalies develops both in the anterior and in the posterior abdominal parts. On the other hand, combined symphysomery and scler- ite enlargement have been noted in the posterior, while other combinations of different aberrations are confined to the anterior sclerites. Therefore, the evidence [furnished elsewhere by Curcic (1989a, b)] obtained for i?. aff. lubricus in general confirms the data for Neobisiurn and Roncus spe- cies, (5) helicomery (combined with other mal- formations) is confined to the anterior sclerites. It is noteworthy that Curcic and Dimitrijevic (1986) have found that the single case of heli- comery was restricted to the posterior region of the abdomen. In each analyzed sample, segmental deficien- cies are unequally distributed between represen- tatives of different sexes. In R. aff. lubricus (A) and R. aff. lubricus (B) from Dubova, the per- centage of anomalous females was higher than that of aberrant males. Only in R. aff. lubricus (B) from Asanovac was the frequency of aberrant males higher than that of females. In the majority of Neobisiurn species which were analyzed by Curcic (1989b), the percentage of anomalous males was found to be higher than that of ab- errant females. In most cases, the development of sclerite anomalies causes simultaneous malformations in the setation of tergites and stemites. In other words, changes in the number, size and dispo- sition of setae result from deficiencies affecting either parts of or whole sclerites. It is already known that the majority of the abdominal anomalies occur during the transfor- mation of the tritonymphs into adults. A con- siderably smaller number of specimens become anomalous when transforming from the deuto- nymph into tritonymphs (Curcic, Krunic and Brajkovic 1 983; Curcic 1 989a, b; Legg and Jones 1988). The causes of the lower frequency of ab- errations in earlier instars are unknown. A number of anomalies are likely to be the result of earlier mechanical injuries, at the ju- venile or the adult stage. The most frequent con- sequence of such lesions, apart from alteration of setation, is the depigmentation of certain areas of the sclerites. Such specimens are viable and fully capable of reproduction. Although the malfunction of the hormonal system, as well as some environmental factors, might be causes of various aberrations in ab- dominal sclerites, it seems likely that genetic fac- tors can also give rise to such aberrations (Gehr- ing 1985). Among them, the factors of metamerization should be especially mentioned. There are a number of findings which would sup- port this view: the constancy of teratological variation in wild populations, a comparatively similar incidence in percentages of abnormal specimens in different populations, the noted de- gree of qualitative diversity and specific features of the distribution of different aberrations at var- ious growth stages and in both sexes in each par- ticular species. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to Zoran Ivkovic (Belgrade) for his useful comments on some statistics used in this paper. We are also grateful to Sigurd Nel- son Jr. and Vincent F. Lee for the constructive criticism of the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Balazuc, J. 1948. La teratologic des Coleopteres et experiences de transplantation sur Tenebrio molitor L. Mem. Mus. Hist. Nat., Paris, 25:1-293. Balazuc, J. 1967. Production experimentale d’an- omalies de segmentation chez Mantis religiosa L. Entomologiste, 23:45-50. 224 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Beier, M. 1955. Pseudoscorpionidea. S. African Anim. Life, 1:263-328. Chamberlin, J. C. 1949. New and little-known false scorpions from various parts of the world (Arach- nida, Chelonethida), with notes on structural ab- normalities in two species. American Mus. Novi- tates, 1430:1-59. Curcic, B. P. M. 1980. Accidental and teratological changes in the family Neobisiidae (Pseudoscor- piones, Arachnida). Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 5: 8-15. Curcic, B. P. M. 1983. New cavernicolous pseudos- corpions from Serbia. Rec. Rapp. Com. Karst Spe- leol., Ed. Spec. Acad. Serbe Sci. Arts, Prcsid., 1 : 1 35- 150. Curcic, B. P. M. 1988. Cave-dwelling pseudoscor- pions of the Dinaric Karst. Acad. Sci. Art. Slov., Cl. IV, Hist. Nat., Opera, 26, Inst. Biol. loannis Hadzi, 8:1-192. Curcic, B. P. M. 1989a. Segmental anomalies in some European Neobisiidae (Pseudoscorpiones, Arach- nida) - Part I. Acta Arachnol., 37:77-87. Curcic, B. P. M. 1989b. Segmental anomalies in some European Neobisiidae (Pseudoscorpiones, Arach- nida) - Part II. Acta Arachnol., 38:1-10. Curcic, B. P. M., & R. N. Dimitrijevic. 1982. On abnormalities of abdominal segmentation in Neo- bisium carpaticum Beier (Neobisiidae, Pseudoscor- piones, Arachnida). Revue Arachnol., 4:143-150. Curcic, B. P. M., & R. N. Dimitrijevic. 1984. An abnormal carapaco-abdominal junction in Neobis- ium carpaticum Beier, 1934 (Neobisiidae, Pseudos- corpiones). Arch. Sci. Biol. Belgrade, 36:9P-10P. Curcic, B. P. M., & R. N. Dimitrijevic. 1985. Ab- dominal deficiencies in four species of the Neobi- siidae (Pseudoscorpiones, Arachnida). Revue Ar- achnol., 6:9 1-98. Curcic, B. P. M., & R. N. Dimitrijevic. 1986. Ab- normalities of carapacal and abdominal segmenta- tion in Neobisium Chamberlin (Neobisiidae, Pseu- doscorpiones). Actas X Congr. Int. Aracnol., Jaca/ Espana, 1:17-23. Curcic, B. P. M., & R. N. Dimitrijevic. 1988. Seg- mental deficiencies in some Neobisiidae (Pseudos- corpiones, Arachnida). TUB-Dokument. Kongr. Tagungen, XI Europ. Arachnol. Coll., Berlin, 1:89- 97. Curcic, B. P. M., M. D. Krunic, & M. M. Brajkovic. 1981. Further records of teratological changes in the Neobisiidae (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpiones). Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 5:280-284. Curcic, B. P. M., M. D. Krunic, & M. M. Brajkovic. 1983. Tergal and sternal anomalies in Neobisium Chamberlin (Neobisiidae, Pseudoscorpiones, Arachnida). J. Arachnol., 11:243-250. Dimitrijevic, R. N. 1985. Patomorfoloska analiza promena u segmentaciji abdomena kod nekih pred- stavnika porodice Neobisiidae (Pseudoscorpiones, Arachnida). M. Sc. Thesis, University of Belgrade. 72 pp. Dimitrijevic, R. N. 1990. Neka obelezja postem- brionalnograzvica i teratoloskih promena kod pseu- doskorpija iz porodica Chthoniidae i Neobisiidae (Pseudoscorpiones, Arachnida). Ph. D. Thesis, Uni- versity of Belgrade. 24 1 pp. Gabbutt, P. D., & M. Vachon. 1963. The external morphology and life history of the pseudoscorpion Chthonius ischnocheles (Hermann). Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 140:75-98. Gardini, G. 1983. Redescription of Rona/x L. Koch, type-species of the genus Roncus L. Koch 1873 (Pseudoscorpionida, Neobisiidae). Bull. Brit- ish Arachnol. Soc., 6:78-82. Gehring, W. J. 1985. Homeotic genes, the homeobox and the genetic control of development. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 50:243-251. Gilbert, O. 1952. Three examples of abnormal seg- mentation of the abdomen in Dactylochelifer la- treillei (Leach), (Chelonethi). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 5:47-49. Gupta, A. P. 1979. Arthropod phylogeny. Van Nos- trand-Reinhold Co., New York, 762 pp. Hadzi, J. 1930. Prirodoslovna istrazivanja sjeverno- dalmatinskog otocja. 1. Dugi i Kornati. Pseudos- corpiones, Prirod. istr. Kralj. Jugosl., 16:65-79. Hadzi, J. 1937. Pseudoscorpioniden aus Siidserbien. Bull. Soc. Sci. Skoplje, 17/18:13-38 and 151-187. Kastner, A. 1927. Pseudoscorpiones. Biologic Tiere Deutschlands (Berlin), 18:1-68. Legg, G., & R. E. Jones. 1988. Pseudoscorpions (Ar- thropoda; Arachnida). Keys and notes for the iden- tification of the species. The Linnean Soc. London, Synopses British Fauna (N. S.), 40:1-159. Pedder, 1. J. 1965. Abnormal segmentation of the abdomen in six species of British pseudoscorpions. Entomologist (London), 98:108-1 12. Weygoldt, P. 1969. The biology of pseudoscorpions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, xiv+ 145 pp. With, C. J. 1905. On Chelonethi, chiefly from Aus- tralian Region, in the collection of the British Mu- seum, with observations on the “coxal sac” and some cases of abnormal segmentation. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., (7)15:94-143. Zlatkovic, M. R. 1989. Segmentalne anomalije kod pseudoskorpija Roncus i Neobisium (Pseudoscor- piones) iz okoline Zitoradje. B. Sci. Thesis, Uni- versity of Belgrade. 42 pp. Manuscript received March 1991, revised May 1991. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:225-226 RESEARCH NOTES AN EXAMPLE OF ABNORMAL CARAPACO-ABDOMINAL FUSION IN NEOBISIUM AFF. FUSCIMANUM (ARACHNIDA, PSEUDOSCORPIONES, NEOBISIIDAE) Teratological phenomena in various represen- 1982). The setation of tergite I has been drasti- tatives of the pseudoscorpion family Neobisiidae are extremely diverse, as shown by Curcic ( 1 980, 1989a, b), Curcic and Dimitrijevic (1984, 1985, 1986, 1990) and Curcic et al. (1981, 1983). The majority of the observed malformations affect the abdominal segmentation, thus causing either tergal or sternal deficiencies. However, a number of specimens have been found which exhibit var- ious aberrations of the chelicerae, pedipalps, and walking legs (Curcic 1980). Records of carapacal deficiencies in the Neo- bisiidae are very sparse. Only recently, an ab- normal carapaco-abdominal junction (fusion) was studied in a male of Neobisium carpaticum Beier (Curcic and Dimitrijevic 1984, 1986). To our knowledge, this is the only case of malformation affecting the carapace which has been discovered to date. In a collection of pseudoscorpions made at Asanovac, near Zitoradja, Serbia (Yugoslavia) during March 1989, one anomalous deuto- nymph of Neobisium aff. fuscimanum (C. L. Koch) was found. The specimen was obtained by sifting humus in an oak forest. In the speci- men, only the carapace and the anterior tergites were anomalous, while the stemites and the ap- pendages were normal in all respects. The purpose of this note is to describe the phenomenon of carapaco-abdominal fusion in the aberrant deutonymph. The carapace and the first two tergites of this specimen are anomalous (Fig. 1). The carapace lacks a chitinous section on the right posterior margin; instead a thin and transparent membrane is present in the area where the missing part of the carapace would otherwise be found. In addition, tergite I is fused with the carapace along its mid-anterior region. As a con- sequence of this deficiency, the carapacal setation in this specimen is significantly altered in relation to the normal setal complement for a deuto- nymph, 4 + 6 -I- 6 + (6-7) = 22-23 (Curcic cally changed, since the number of setae is greatly increased and their distribution irregular. The deutonymph of N . fuscimanum normally carries 6-8 setae on tergite I (Curcic 1982). Tergite II bears 3 small setae on the left, but is devoid of setae on the right. The tergal section with 6 setae otherwise found anterior to tergite II might rep- resent a part of this tergite, which perhaps had been split originally into two transverse areas. However, it is also possible that this demi-tergite may represent a supernumerary sclerite, located between tergites I and II. This assumption is based on the presence of an additional row of setae on this isolated tergal section. A similar case has been noted in N. sylvaticum C. L. Koch (Curcic and Dimitrijevic 1985). Altogether, five types of abnormalities have been found to affect the car- apace and abdominal tergites in this deuto- nymph: (1) partial atrophy of the carapace, (2) carapaco-abdominal fusion [symphysomery], (3) partial atrophy of tergite II, (4) the occurrence of a supernumerary sclerite and, (5) the alteration of setation in both carapace and tergites. The segmental anomalies in neobisiid species mainly occur during the “maturation molt”, or the transformation of tritonymph into adult (Curcic 1989b). Considerably fewer specimens become aberrant when transforming from deu- tonymph into tritonymph, or from the proto- nymph into deutonymph, as was shown by Cur- cic ( 1 989a, b) and Curcic and Dimitrijevic ( 1 986). The origin of the malformations in this spec- imen of N. aff. fuscimanum is still unclear. We assume that the genesis of the drastically mod- ified carapaco-abdominal junction in this ex- ample is provoked by genetic factors, especially those affecting the metamerization period, as was shown elsewhere by Gehring (1985) for repre- sentatives of various invertebrates. We are grateful to M. R. Zlatkovic (Zitoradja) for his help in collecting pseudoscorpions. 225 226 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure \ .—Neobisium aS. fuscimanum (C. L. Koch). Scale line = 0.5 mm. C+Tl = carapace and tergite I, ST = supernumerary tergite (?), T2 = tergite II. LITERATURE CITED Curcic, B. P. M. 1980. Accidental and teratological changes in the family Neobisiidae (Pseudoscor- piones, Arachnida). Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 5: 9-15. Curcic, B. P. M. 1982. Postembryonic development in the Neobisiidae (Pseudoscorpiones, Arachnida). Serb. Acad. Sci. Arts, Belgrade, Monogr., DXLV, Dept. Sci., 56:1-90. Curcic, B. P. M. 1989a. Segmental anomalies in some European Neobisiidae (Pseudoscorpiones, Arach- nida) - Part I. Acta Arachnol., 37:77-87. Curcic, B. P. M. 1989b. Segmental anomalies in some European Neobisiidae (Pseudoscorpiones, Arach- nida) - Part II. Acta Arachnol., 38:1-10. Curcic, B. P. M., & R. N. Dimitrijevic. 1984. An abnormal carapaco-abdominal junction in Neobis- lum carpaticum Beier, 1934 (Neobisiidae, Pseudos- corpiones). Arch. Sci. Biol. Belgrade, 36:9P-10P. Curcic, B. P. M., & R. N. Dimitrijevic. 1985. Ab- dominal deficiencies in four species of the Neobi- siidae (Pseudoscorpiones, Arachnida). Rev. Arach- nol., 6:91-98. Curcic, B. P. M., & R. N. Dimitrijevic. 1986. Ab- normalities of carapacal and abdominal segmenta- tion in Neobisium Chamberlin (Neobisiidae, Pseu- doscorpiones). Actas X Congr. Int. Aracnol., Jaca/ Espana 1986, 1:17-23. Curcic, B. P. M., & R. N. Dimitrijevic. 1990. An example of partial duplication of the abdomen in Neobisium simoni (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae). J. Arachnol., 18:113-115. Curcic, B. P. M., M. D. Krunic, & M. M. Brajkovic. 1981. Further records of teratological changes in the Neobisiidae (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpiones). Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 5:280-284. Curcic, B. P. M., M. D. Krunic, & M. M. Brajkovic. 1983. Tergal and sternal anomalies in Neobisium Chamberlin (Neobisiidae, Pseudoscorpiones, Arachnida). J. Arachnol., 1 1:243-250. Gehring, W. J. 1985. Homeotic genes, the homeobox and the genetic control of development. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 50:243-251. Bozidar P. M. Curcic and Rajko N. Dimitrijevic: Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Uni- versity of Belgrade, Studentski Trg 16, YU- 1 1000 Beograd, Yugoslavia. Manuscript received May 1991. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:227-228 IN VITRO POST DISPERSAL BURROW SHARING AMONG SPIDERLING GEOLYCOSA TURRICOLA (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) An essential component in the evolution of sociality in spiders is the extension of broodmate tolerance and the delay, or reduction (e.g., Age- lena consociata Denis; RoeloflFs & Riechert 1988) of dispersal of the young (Shear 1 970). Subsocial strategies (maternal social or extended tolerance among broodmates) may be viewed as inter- mediate between the solitary life style of most species and the complex behavior of the social species in that social cohesion is temporary (though in some species it is prolonged, e.g., Nemisia caementaria, Buchli 1969). The nature of the dispersal strategy in these temporarily so- cial groups is of interest. In particular, the ques- tion whether the mechanisms that end the sub- social phase also trigger the onset of dispersal is important since post-dispersal tolerance among broodmates or spiderlings and their mother would raise the possibility that the advantages of subsociality reach beyond the proximate ben- efits of food procurement or protection at the nest site to processes of later development such as nest site location and mate finding. To date, there have been few studies of the dispersal strat- egy of subsocial spiders (a notable exception is Krafft et al. 1 985) and, thus, little is known about the functional ecology of this process. Here I report observations from a study of the burrow- ing spider Geolycosa turricola (Treat) that suggest that dispersal and the termination of tolerant behavior may be independent events in this spe- cies. The biology and ecology of G. turricola has been previously reported in detail (Miller & Mil- ler 1987, 1991). Briefly, females produce egg cases in their burrows in early spring and remain there during the early development of the young (Mil- ler & Miller 1 985). Some spiderlings may remain with their siblings in the maternal burrow well past the time when dispersal and burrow con- struction is possible. During this time tolerant spiderlings share large prey items and exhibit no cannibalism or agonistic behaviors toward broodmates (Miller 1989). As part of a study of the mechanism that trig- gers dispersal from these subsocial groups (Mil- ler, in prep.), I observed the dispersal activities of five broods (each with their mother; brood size T = 82, SD = 15.3), each placed in paper burrows positioned in the center of 1.5 m di- ameter plastic swimming pools. Adult Geolycosa readily accept paper burrows and routinely build turrets on them. A sand substrate devoid of veg- etation surrounded each burrow; the sand was moistened each morning and afternoon with a plant mister. The arenas were observed twice each day for a period of four months (March- June). Spiderlings that dispersed from all the ma- ternal burrows (n = 78) easily constructed bur- rows in the sand. Small crickets were provided for food. On six occasions (twice in one arena; once each in the four other arenas) a spiderling dispersed, constructed a burrow and, within a day, was joined in that burrow by another spiderling. On two occasions, (two different arenas) three spi- derlings shared a single small burrow. The shared burrows were located a considerable distance from the maternal burrow (point of dispersal) {X = 22.3 cm, SD = 6.2, n = 8) but were significantly closer to the maternal burrow than burrows con- taining single spiderlings {X = 43.1 cm, SD = 10.2, n = 78, all arenas combined; t = 5.64, P < 0.001). The average diameter of the shared burrows was not significantly different from that of burrows containing only a single spider. Upon their discovery, each shared burrow was enclosed with a small screen cage (6 cm in di- ameter) so that burrow desertion by one or both of the spiderlings could be observed (small crick- ets were provided for food). The period of bur- row sharing ranged from 3 to 1 2 days. In five of the six burrows shared by two spiderlings, one of the spiderling deserted and constructed an- other burrow within the wire cage. In the other case one of the spiderlings disappeared and was presumed to have been eaten. In the case of the two burrows shared by three spiderlings, two of the spiderlings deserted the burrow and each con- structed burrows of their own within the cage. 227 228 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY It is unclear how burrows were located by dis- persing spiderlings. Groups of spiderling G. tur- ricola held in Petri dishes deposit a considerable amount of silk (Miller 1989) and there is some evidence that silk is deposited by dispersing spi- derlings (Miller unpubk). Such silk trails could be followed by dispersing broodmates. The short time between the establishment of a burrow by a spiderling, and the joining of the spiderling by another individual (less than a day in each case) suggests such a process. Such a process might be facilitated if spiderlings disperse in groups or swarms such as in some social spiders (Lubin & Robinson 1985). However, the presence of such behavior would presumably result in nonran- dom vectors of dispersal from the maternal bur- row. Field and laboratory studies of the pattern of burrow establishment of this species (Miller & Miller 1991) do not show such directionality. The burrow sharing observed here probably does not reflect a paucity of suitable burrow sites within the experimental chambers. Although Miller ( 1 984) showed that spiderling G. turricola prefer burrow sites that contain some vegetation, different from the barren conditions of this ex- periment, the number of shared burrows repre- sented only 10% of the total number of spiders that were observed to build burrows in the ap- paratus indicating that the majority of spider- lings found suitable burrow sites. Burrow sharing could represent an avenue for delaying the cost of burrow construction. Spi- derling G. turricola and G. rafaelana are known to disperse in late summer and then delay burrow construction until the spring (Miller & Miller 1991, Conley 1985, respectively). Miller & Mil- ler ( 1 99 1 ) showed that the size of the first burrow, which is highly correlated to the size of the spi- derling, is an important indicator of overwinter survivorship in G. turricola. However, burrow sharing has never been observed in the field. Moreover, it is unclear what advantage burrow sharing after dispersal has over subsocial toler- ance in the maternal burrow. Dispersal from subsocial groups is generally viewed as simply the endpoint of the tolerant phase, albeit somewhat delayed in comparison to non-social species. In this view, dispersal serves as the dependent variable measuring the re- sponse of a brood to the events that alter social behavior. The observations reported here suggest that the factors that work to initiate dispersal from subsocial broods may be independent of those that imply the termination of mutual tol- erance. I appreciate the comments of Patricia Miller, Micky Eubanks, Kari Benson, Chester Figiel, Craig Hieber, Gail Stratton and an anonymous reviewer. This work was supported by a Faculty Development Grant from the Graduate School of the University of Mississippi. LITERATURE CITED Buchli, H. H. R. 1969. Hunting behavior in the Cten- izidae. American Zool., 9:175-193. Conley, M. R. 1985. Predation versus resource lim- itation in survival of adult burrowing wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Oecologia (Berlin), 67:7 1-75. Krafft, B., A. Horel & J-M. Julita. 1 986. Influence of food supply on the duration of the gregarious phase of a maternal-social spider, Coelotes terrestris (Ara- neae, Agelenidae). J. Arachnol., 14: 219-226. Lubin, Y. D. & M. H. Robinson. 1982. Dispersal by swarming in a social spider. Science, 216:319-321. Miller, G. L. 1984. The influence of microhabitat and prey availability on burrow establishment of young Geolycosa turricola (Treat) and G. micanopy Wallace (Araneae: Lycosidae): A laboratory study. Psyche, 91:123-132. Miller, G. L. 1989. Subsocial organization and be- havior in broods of the obligate burrowing wolf spi- der Geolycosa turricola (Treat). Canadian J. Zool., 67:819-824. Miller, G. L. & P. R. Miller. 1987. Life cycle and courtship behavior of the burrowing wolf spider Geolycosa turricola (Treat) (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol., 15:385-394. Miller, P. R. & G. L. Miller. 1991. Dispersal and survivorship in a population of Geolycosa turricola (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol., 19:49-54. Roelofls, R. & S. E. Riechert. 1988. Dispersal and population-genetic structure of the cooperative spi- der, Agelena consociata, in west African rainforest. Evolution, 42:173-183. Shear, W. A. 1970. The evolution of social phenom- ena in spiders. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 1:65-77. Gary L. Miller: Department of Biology, the University of Mississippi, University, Missis- sippi 38677 USA. Manuscript received September 1991, revised October 1991. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:229-230 HOMOSEXUAL MATING BEHAVIOR IN MALE DORYONYCHUS RAPTOR (ARANEAE, TETRAGNATHIDAE) Homosexual behavior has been documented in a large number of vertebrates, particularly pri- mates, in which it plays an important function in establishing dominance (Crook 1972). In birds, homosexual behavior appears to be quite com- mon (Armstrong 1942), and, in certain monog- amous species, may lead to the establishment of lesbian relationships (Hunt et al. 1984). Among invertebrates, homosexual mounting behavior is found in a number of insects (Kaneshiro & Gid- dings 1987; Juberthie-Jupeau & Cazals 1989), as well as phalangids (Bristowe 1929). Male-male courtship display has been observed in several spiders in the families Salticidae and Lycosidae (Bristowe 1929). Homosexual mounting or mat- ing behaviors, however, have, to my knowledge, never been documented in spiders. An elaborate mutual courtship is usually a nec- essary component of sexual interactions between spiders, and serves one or a number of functions (Robinson & Robinson 1980; Suter 1990): (1) reduce the risk of predation; (2) mutual arousal; (3) species recognition; and (4) assessment of vir- ginity. Prior to mating, therefore, courtship will generally have resulted in mutual communica- tion between the sexes. This would preclude the likelihood of attempted copulation between in- dividuals of the same sex. One exception in this regard are tetragnathid spiders, which lack any form of apparent court- ship (Levi 1981). On encountering each other, both the male and female tetragnathid appear to interact combatively, with their chelicerae and fangs outstretched. If the sexual encounter is suc- cessful, the fangs of the female become locked against the spur (apophysis) on the dorsal surface of the male’s chelicerae. The fangs of the male are then closed over those of the female, and the pair are thus securely locked together (the chel- iceral teeth themselves are not involved in this locking mechanism). At this point the female generally curls her abdomen anterioventrally, so that her seminal receptacles are rotated forward, thereby facilitating palpal insertion by the male. The male moves one palp under the abdomen of the female, then over the surface until it comes in contact with the seminal receptacles. The oth- er palp is held almost vertically up above the carapace (palps are alternated during mating). On 29th July 1990 I captured several Doryon- ychus raptor Simon in Waiahuakua Valley (1 100 ft.) on the Hawaiian island of Kauai. These spi- ders, endemic to Kauai, are robust (female 12- 15 mm, male 10 mm) and readily recognized by the extremely long claws on the tarsi of the first two pairs of legs (Simon 1900). Two penultim.ate males were maintained together in a glass con- tainer (22.5 cm X 22.5 cm x 25.0 cm) and fed on laboratory-reared Drosophila grimshawi, molted to maturity after 5 and 1 1 days respectively. Twenty five days after capture (23rd August), I observed these male spiders with their chelicerae locked together (I did not witness the initial cou- pling), one male with its fangs locked against the dorsal apophysis of the other. The abdomens were paraxial, neither curled under. The only movement observed was that of the palps of both males. These were used alternately to “search” the underside of the abdomen of the respective partner for 30-210 s before switching to the alternate palp. This behavior continued for 1 7 minutes, although, because I did not observe the initial encounter of the pair, the exact duration of the interaction is unknown. After this time the spiders disengaged naturally in a manner similar to disengagement in normal inter-sexual en- counters in tetragnathids. Neither appeared harmed by the interaction. The behavior observed was considered sexual rather than aggressive. Aggression between in- dividual tetragnathids (within or between sexes) involves extension of the fangs and chelicerae, followed by violent lunging, usually culminating in the death or retreat of one, and sometimes both, of the combatants (pers. obs.). Sexual be- havior between male and female D. raptor is sim- ilar to that of other tetragnathids (pers. obs.). Neither participant struggles during a sexual in- teraction, the only movement being alternation of the palps and minor adjustments in position. At the end, separation occurs by release of the jaws without any lunging. The observation of homosexual mating be- havior in D. raptor argues for the absence of 229 230 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY powers of sexual discrimination by males of this species. In insects the exhibition of this type of behavior among males appears to be a conse- quence of mistaken identity. Among the Ha- waiian drosophilids, this behavior has been as- sociated with the absence of powers of sexual discrimination in males, with female choice playing the critical role in mating success (Ka- neshiro & Giddings 1987). Male acceptance is based on his performance during a complex courtship display, which involves visual, tactile, chemical and/or acoustic stimulation. Among spiders, mistaken identity may explain the observation of males courting other males (Bristowe 1929). The potentially lethal effects of allowing this behavior to continue on to attempt- ed copulation is likely to have selected for some form of sexual discrimination among male spi- ders. It may be, however, that the unique cou- pling behavior of tetragnathids, where the che- licerae and fangs are securely locked, has allowed the loss of male sexual discrimination. As yet there is no information on female sexual discrimination in tetragnathids. It may well oc- cur, however, through the action of either pher- omones (Tietjen & Rovner 1982), or mechanical stimulation (Eberhard 1985). This study was supported by grants from the Hawaii Bishop Research Institute, the Hawaii Natural Area Reserves System and the Nature Conservancy of Hawaii. I am deeply indebted to C. Parrish for helping me to collect specimens and to K. Kaneshiro for use of his environmen- tally controlled facilities to maintain live speci- mens. LITERATURE CITED Armstrong, E. A. 1942. Bird Display: An Introduc- tion to the Study of Bird Psychology. Cambridge University Press, London. Bristowe, W. S. 1929. The mating habits of spiders with special reference to the problems surrounding sexual dimorphism. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1929: 309-358. Crook, J.H. 1972. Sexual selection, dimorphism, and social organization in the primates. Pp. 23 1-28 1 , In Sexual selection and the Descent of Man, 1871- 1971. (B. G. Campbell, ed.). Aldine, Chicago. Eberhard, W. G. 1985. Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. Hunt, G. L., Jr., A. L. Newman, M. H. Warner, J. C. Wingfield & J. Kaiwi. 1984. Comparative behav- ior of male-female and female-female pairs among Western gulls prior to egg-laying. Condor, 86:157- 162. Juberthie-Jupeau, L. & M. Cazals. 1989. Agressivite de deux males en presence d’une femelle conspe- cifique chez un coleoptere souterrain, Speomomus delarouzeei Fairm. (Coleoptera, Catopidae). Mem. Biospeol., Tome XVI: 183-187. Kaneshiro, K. Y. & L. V. Giddings. 1987. The sig- nificance of asymmetrical sexual isolation and the formation of new species. Evolutionary Biology, 21: 29^3. Levi, H. W. 1981. The American orb-weaver genus Dolichognatha and Tetragnatha north of Mexico (Araneae: Araneidae, Tetragnathinae). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, 149:271-318. Robinson, M. H. & B. Robinson. 1980. Comparative studies of the courtship and mating behavior of tropical araneid spiders. Pacific Insect Monograph, 36, pp. 203-208. Simon, E. 1900. Arachnida: Fauna Hawaiiensis, 2: 443-519, pis. 15-19. Suter, R. B. 1990. Courtship and the assessment of virginity by male bowl and doily spiders. Anim. Behav., 39:307-313. Tietjen, W. J. & J. S. Rovner. 1982. Chemical com- munication in lycosids and other spiders. Pp. 249- 279, In Spider Communication: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance. (P. N. Witt & J. S. Rovner, eds.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Rosemary G, Gillespie, Department of Zoology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 USA. Manuscript received December 1990, revised February 1991. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:231-232 RESPONSE OF NEPHILA CLAVIPES TO MOCK PREDATION CHANGES WITH THE PROXIMITY OF THE MOLT Disturbance and predation attempts have been recognized as being important determinants of web-site tenacity in orb-weaving spiders (Eber- hard 1971;Enders 1976). Response to simulated predation by vibrating the web and dropping from the web have been documented for a variety of orb-weavers, including Nephila clavipes (Linn.) (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) (Tolbert 1975). To in- vestigate the role of failed predation attempts on web-site abandonment in N. clavipes, I subjected juveniles collected in the field to a strong stim- ulus: a leg was pinched, causing autotomization. Intact spiders of 0.3 to 0.4 cm leg I tibia + patella length were collected from Barro Colo- rado Island and Gigante Peninsula in the Barro Colorado Island National Monument, Panama. These spiders were housed in an insectary in the laboratory clearing on the island, where they spun webs in 23-25 cm diameter frames consisting of two 0.5 cm strips of fiberglass fixed at right angles and hung from one of the points of intersection. These frames were uncovered, and the spiders were always at liberty to move within the insec- tary. Spiders were fed two 6 mm live prey items daily, usually small moths or Trigona Jurine stingless bees that were placed in the orb. After about 10 days in captivity, five spiders were sub- jected to a mock predator attack involving pinch- ing the tibia with dissection forceps. Seven or 1 4 days later, the remaining five were attacked. The response to mock-predation involving leg autotomization was immediate abandonment of the web, but not necessarily of the web site. Nine spiders autotomized either a first or a second leg; one spider eluded the forceps and escaped the web. Six spiders abandoned the web site by drop- ping on a drag-line and spinning an air-bome bridge thread, and were later found building a new web within the insectary. The remaining four hid on the fiberglass web support and later returned to the original web. Three of these four spiders molted within five days of the attack (range 2-4; mean 2.7 days), one molted seven days after the attack. The spiders that abandoned their webs were all more than five days away from the next molt (range 6-8, mean 7.4 days). The response to the attack was significantly af- fected by the proximity of the molt (within five days vs. more than five days to molting: N=10, likelihood ratio “G” test = 6.43, df= 1 , p=0.005). The failure of premolt spiders to abandon their webs after a predation attempt is probably re- lated to the physiological processes involved in preparing for molting. Orb-web size declines in the last four or five days before the molt, and spiders cease spinning viscid orbs one to three days before molting (Higgins 1990). About when spiders cease spinning, the principal major am- pullate silk glands are reconstructed (M. T ownley and E. Tillinghast, pers. comm.). These glands are the source of the orb-web frame lines and probably also of the barrier- web silk (E. Tilling- hast, pers. comm.). N. clavipes undergoes ec- dysis suspended from the dorsal side of the orb or the dorsal barrier web-hub connection (Hig- gins 1990). Premolt spiders may have a greatly reduced or negligible capacity to spin a new web, and surviving the molt without a web is highly unlikely. Special thanks are due to M. Townley and E. Tillinghast, whose discussions of unpublished work concerning silk synthesis provided new in- sight into these results. H. Drummond and J. L. Osorno read and commented upon the manu- script. LITERATURE CITED Eberhard, W.G. 1971. The ecology of the web of Uloborus diversus (Araneae, Uloboridae). Oecolo- gia, 6:328-342. Enders, F. 1 976. Effects of prey capture, web destruc- tion and habitat physiogamy on web-site tenacity of Argiope spiders. J. ArachnoL, 3:75-82. Higgins, L. E. 1988. Variation in web structure in the orb-weaving spider Nephila clavipes and correlated changes in life history. Ph. D. Dissertation. Uni- versity of Texas at Austin. Higgins, L. 1990. Variation in foraging investment during the intermolt and before egg-laying in the spider Nephila clavipes. i. Insect Behav., 3:773-783. Horton, C. C. 1982. Predators of two orb-web spiders (Araneae, Araneidae). J. Arachnol. 1 1: 447-449. Reichert, S.E. & C. R. Tracy. 1975. Thermal balance and prey availability: Bases for a model relating web-site characteristics to spider reproductive suc- cess. Ecology, 56:265-284. Tolbert, W. W. 1975. Predator avoidance behaviors and web defensive structures in the orb weavers 231 232 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Argiope aurantia and Argiope trifasciata (Araneae: Araneidae). Psyche, 82:29-52. Linden Higgins: Centro de Ecologia Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Apartado Postal 70-275, Ciudad Universitaria, C.P. 04510 MEXICO. Current address: Depart- ment of Zoology, University of Texas at Aus- tin; Austin, Texas 78712 USA Manuscript received March 1991, revised June 1991. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:233-234 BOOK REVIEW Dondale, Charles D. & James H. Redner. 1990. The Insects and Arachnids of Canada. Part 17. The Wolf Spiders, Nurseryweb Spiders, and Lynx Spiders of Canada and Alaska (Ara- neae: Lycosidae, Pisauridae, and Oxyopidae). Agriculture Canada Publication No. 1856. 383 pages. ($20.00 in Canada, $24.00 elsewhere). Available from Canadian Government Publish- ing Centre, Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, Canada KIA 0S9. This, the third in a series of identification man- uals for the spiders of Canada, treats the mem- bers of the superfamily Lycosoidea, which are recognized by the unique, grate-shaped form of the tapeta of the indirect eyes. Included are Ly- cosidae, with 14 genera and 107 species recorded or believed to occur in Canada, Pisauridae, with two genera and seven species, and Oxyopidae, with two species in the lone genus Oxyopes. The organization and format follow that of previous contributions (Dondale & Redner 1978; Don- dale & Redner 1 982). The introductory and anat- omy sections are detailed, allowing this volume to “stand alone,” and there is an extensive glos- sary. Methodology is admirably explicit. As with previous volumes, geographic scope is limited to Canada and Alaska, and toward this end even previously published figures were remounted and renumbered, and new maps made providing no new information but serving only to exclude the continental United States. Descriptions are concise, and effective diag- noses are presented under “Comments.” Biolog- ical information is provided wherever possible and, drawing on an extensive bibliography of 273 entries, is comprehensive. Illustrations are many (596 in all), including dorsal views of the cara- pace and abdomen for all genera. Male palpi are illustrated whole in ventral view and details of the terminal division are supplied; epigyna and vulvae are illustrated for females of all species. Representative illustrations are labelled so that the application of morphological terms is clear. The illustrations are excellent for species iden- tification and more than adequate for those who wish a source of data on the genital morphology of the taxa involved. Many figures are provided with unlabelled arrows, which presumably point out important features discussed in the text. New keys are provided, in both official languages of Canada, to genera within families and species within genera. Keys are detailed with numerous references to figures, and work well. In some cases (e.g., Pardosa, Pirata), the new keys are a great improvement. Given the rather strict geographic demarcation of the work, utility of the keys ex- cept in the immediate vicinity of Canada and Alaska will probably be limited. There are some minor nomenclatural prob- lems. Hogna and Varacosa, both previously con- sidered junior synonyms (the former of Lycosa and the latter of Trochosa: Platnick 1989), are treated as valid, though no discussions of their new status are provided. How is Hogna to be diagnosed from the European Lycosa, and what are their relationships? What happened to Ra- bidosa, which was still a valid genus at last look (Platnick 1989)? But these are technical points reflecting validity (a scientific decision), which is beyond the scope of an identification manual, and as an identification manual this work suc- ceeds admirably. A review of a work of this nature would be incomplete without consideration of the pros and cons of such regional faunal studies. More to the point, in view of the American Arachnological Society’s endorsement of the proposal for a biotic survey of the United States (Kosztarab 1988), a proposal that is slowly but inexorably making its way toward realization, all readers of the Journal of Arachnology should take time to consider whether the scarce resources available for sys- tematic biology are best utilized to produce re- gional “faunas” of this kind. Whereas stated ben- efits of regional surveys (e.g., Kosztarab 1988) run the gamut from providing baseline data nec- essary for monitoring environmental quality to enhancing national security (!), three arguments state the case forcefully: 1 . they provide widely available keys and means for identification that are useful to land-use planners and biologists of all persuasions, specialists and novices alike; 2. insofar as they accurately reflect the taxonomy and distribution of species treated, they offer a baseline for monitoring environmental changes, and may provide data on endemism and poten- 233 234 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY tial endangered status; and 3. regional emphasis leads to decentralization, which appeals to leg- islators and makes such studies potentially fund- able (pork barrel systematics). These are not ar- guments to be dismissed lightly! On the other hand, arguments against the regional approach are many (see especially Liebherr 1989; Pakaluk & Wahl 1989). Regional studies generally offer an incomplete treatment of natural groups or ar- eas; and distributional data, while accurate for the region treated, may not reflect the whole pic- ture. Students participating in such studies are often ill-prepared to compete for jobs, grants, and tenure. Resources are focussed on countries relatively rich in money (and poor in biodiver- sity) while monetarily poor (and diversity-rich) countries are neglected. Finally, regional studies perpetuate the stereotype that systematics con- sists largely of naming species, rather than its more important contribution of a phylogenetic context within which comparative biology be- comes meaningful, and they divert scarce re- sources from the latter pursuit. In many ways this work represents a “best case” scenario for a regional study. Dondale and Redner have published six up-to-date mono- graphs of North American Lycosidae which, when added to Brady’s work on lycosids and oxyopids and Carico’s work on pisaurids, provides the sound monographic taxonomy necessary to un- derpin such a regional study. The first author has also produced an exemplary study of lycosid higher classification (Dondale 1986). In view of the quality and scope of that monographic work, one may lament that Agriculture Canada BRC has mandated that their researchers contribute to this national series, and reflect that the con- siderable talents and resources herein displayed might have been better utilized to finish mono- graphing the Lycosidae of North America rather than to prepare this handsome but largely re- dundant volume. Needless to say, as an identification manual this work is superior, and it will be indispensable to any student of the terrestrial arthropods of Canada and Alaska who has no access to the primary literature. LITERATURE CITED Dondale, C. D. 1 986. The subfamilies of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Adas X Congreso de Arach- nologia, Jaca, Espana. 1:327-332. Dondale, C. D. & J. H. Redner. 1978. The Insects and Arachnids of Canada. Part 5. The Crab Spiders of Canada and Alaska (Araneae: Philodromidae and Thomisidae). Agriculture Canada Publication No. 1663. 255 pages. Dondale, C. D. & J. H. Redner. 1982. The Insects and Arachnids of Canada. Part 9. The Sac Spiders of Canada and Alaska (Araneae: Clubionidae and Anyphaenidae). Agriculture Canada Publication No. 1724. 194 pages. Kosztarab, M. 1988. Biological Diversity: National Biological Survey. Pp. 1-25. In: Proceedings of the first annual symposium on the natural history of lower Tennessee and Cumberland river valleys. Clarksville, Tennessee. (Snyder, D., ed.). The Center for Field Biology of Land Between The Lakes, Aus- tin Peay State University. Liebherr, J. K. 1989. An Open Letter Regarding Re- cent Proposals for Nationalistic Entomological Sys- tematics. Insect Collection News, 2:10-1 1. Pakaluk, J. & D. B. Wahl. 1989. Systematic Ento- mology and Biological Diversity. Insect Collection News, 2:7-8. Platnick, N. 1. 1 989. Advances in Spider Taxonomy, 1 98 1-1987; a supplement to Brignoli’s ‘A Catalogue of the Araneae described between 1940 and 1981’. Manchester University Press, Manchester, England. 673 pages. Charles E. Griswold: California Academy Sci., Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California 94118 USA Manuscript received November 1991. 1991. The Journal of Arachnology 19:235-236 BOOK REVIEW Izmailova, M. V. 1989. Fauna of Spiders of Southeastern Siberia (In Russian). Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, USSR. 184 pp., figs. This is a first book written about Siberian spi- ders. It includes data on 341 species belonging to 2 1 families from the southeastern Siberia. Data are based on the author’s collections from 1967 to 1981 in the southern part of the Irkutsk Re- gion, the Krasnoyarsk Region (Boguchansk Dis- trict), the Buryatia and the western Chita Region. Eighty species are listed only from the literature and were not collected by the author. The chap- ters include: the history of araneological research in Siberia; physiographic description of East Si- beria (very extensive and never referred to in later chapters), faunal list with localities (pictures of genitalia and synonymies are given for selected species), data on habitat distribution and eco- logical characteristics (for coniferous and mixed forests, shrubs, swamps and rocky habitats) and zoogeography. The last monographic book on spiders from the Soviet Union was Spiders of Tadjikistan by E. M. Andreeva (1976). Thus, a serious treat- ment of the regional Siberian fauna would have been welcomed. However, this book is a disap- pointment. It contains many errors and under- represents the current knowledge of Siberian spi- ders. Moreover, it does not adhere to the com- mon standards for faunistic publications on spi- ders. The chapters of this book dealing with system- atics are full of mistakes. Besides numerous mis- spellings of Latin names, the author ignores (or is not aware of) recent changes in taxonomy. She lists many linyphiid species under their old ge- neric names (e.g., Simula flavescens, instead of Maro f. , Mengea warburtoni instead of Allo- mengea w.). Synonyms Cornicularia karpinskii and Wideria k. are listed as two different species. Many generic names in the Araneidae and some in the Theridiidae and Salticidae are outdated. Junior synonyms of many species are not listed. Although the author likely had at her disposal very limited reference sources, Russian arach- nologists often exchange information. Thus, there appears to be little reason not to check all syn- onymies and update references. Of the 226 spider species collected or identified by the author, 121 are represented only by one or two adult specimens. Ten species are repre- sented only by juveniles. Surprisingly, only one drawing, that of Sitticus finschi, shows the gen- italia for both males and females. All other 166 pictures show either palp or epigyne. Moreover, judging from these pictures, many species are misidentified; e.g., Pisaura mirabilis should be P. ancora, Araneus grossus should be Aculepeira carbonarioides, Zelotes subterraneans should be Z. fratris, and many others. Synonymy of some species is not checked, and they are listed twice, under both valid name and a junior synonym. Acantholycosa norvegica is listed the second time as A.fedotovi; Alopecosa sibirica - as A. pinnata\ Alopecosa solivaga - as A. poecila\ Steatoda bi- punctata - as Lithyphanthes corollatus, etc. Many species are listed under the names that became junior synonyms long ago. In one case, Izmailova discovers a new homonymy (Gnaphosa punctata Kulczynski and G. punctata Tullgren) but does not discuss it and does not give a new name to the junior homonym. Two new species are described by M. Izmai- lova: Alopecosa litvinovi and Pardosa “sp.n.”; the latter one is not given any name. In both de- scriptions, no diagnosis is provided, holotype specimens are not designated, and the place of their deposit is not given. The distribution information for more than 70 species is incorrect (e. g., circum-Holarctic spe- cies Gnaphosa borea is referred to as “endemic of East Siberia”). Listed as “endemics of the Asi- atic USSR” are G. borea, Clubiona interjecta, Xysticus lectus {=X. britcheri), X. transsibiricus (=X ephippiatus), Linyphia tridens {=Estrandia grandeva)-, however, these spiders are found also in North America and/or China, Mongolia and Japan. Among the “first records for the USSR” are Xysticus britcheri, Gnaphosa chajfanjoni, Haplodrassus moderatus, Evarcha albaria-a.\\ of which were recorded for the USSR before. 235 236 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Unfortunately, this book cannot serve as a guide to Siberian spiders. It is outdated in ref- erences and synonymy, and it has numerous mis- takes. Victor Fet: Department of Biological Sciences, Loyola University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118, USA. Yuri Marusik: Institute of the Biological Prob- lems of the North, Russian Academy of Sci- Manuscript received June 1991. revised August 1991. ences, Magadan 685010, Russia. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Manuscripts are preferred in English but may be accepted in Spanish, French or Portuguese subject to availability of appropriate reviewers. Authors whose primary language is not English, may consult the Associate Editor for assistance in obtaining help with English manuscript preparation. All man- uscripts should be prepared in general accordance with the current edition of the Council of Biological Editors (CBE) Style Manual unless instructed otherwise below. Authors are ad- vised to consult a recent issue of the Journal of Arachnology for additional points of style. Send three identical copies of the typed material together with copies of illustrations to: Gary L. Miller, Associate Editor The Journal of Arachnology Department of Biology The University of Mississippi University, Mississippi 38677 USA Telephone: (601) 232-7495 FAX: (601) 232-5144 Bitnet: BYMILLER@UMSVM Correspondence relating to manuscripts should also be di- rected to the Associate Editor. Manuscripts longer than 1 500 words should be prepared as Feature Articles, shorter papers as Research Notes. FEATURE ARTICLES Title page.— Place in the upper left comer the complete name, address, and telephone number of the author with whom proofs and correspondence should be exchanged. Include FAX num- bers and Bitnet addresses if available. Four lines below, type the title, centered, all in capital letters. Another four lines be- low, beginning with the left margin, type each author’s name on a new line followed by the address. Abstract.— The heading should be placed at the beginning of the first paragraph set off by a period. In articles written in English, a second abstract in an acceptable language may be included pertinent to the nationality of the authorfs) or geo- graphic region(s) emphasized in the article. A second abstract in English must be included in articles not written in the latter language. Text.— Double-space text, tables, legends, etc. throughout. Three levels of heads are used. The first level (METHODS, RESULTS, etc.) is typed in capitals and on a separate line. The second level head begins a paragraph with an indent and is separated from the text by a period and a dash. The third level may or may not begin a paragraph but is underscored and separated from the text by a colon. Use only the underline method to indicate italics; DO NOT USE WORD PROCES- SOR ITALICS CODES. Use the metric system unless quoting text or referencing collection data. All decimal fractions are indicated by the period regardless of language of the text. Citation of references in the text.— Include within parenthe- ses the surnames of the author(s) followed by the date of pub- lication. A comma separates multiple citations by the same author(s) and a semicolon separates citations by different au- thors, e.g., (Smith 1970), (Jones 1988; Smith 1989), (Smith 1986, 1987; Smith & Jones 1989; Jones et al. 1989). Literature cited section.— Use the following style: Lombardi, S. J. & D. L. Kaplan. 1990. The amino acid composition of major ampullate gland silk (dragline) of Ne- phila clavipes (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J. ArachnoL, 18: 297-306. Krafft, B. 1982. The significance and complexity of com- munication in spiders. Pp. 1 5-66, In Spider Communica- tions: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance. (P. N. Witt & J. S. Rovner, eds.). PrincetonUniversity Press, Princeton. Footnotes.— Footnotes are only permitted on the first printed page to indicate current address or other information con- cerning the author(s). All footnotes are placed together on a separate manuscript page. Running head.— Author sumame(s) and an abbreviated title must be typed all in caps and must not exceed 60 characters and spaces. The running head is placed by itself on a separate manuscript page. Taxonomic articles.— Consult a recent taxonomic article in the Journal of Arachnology for style or contact the Associate Editor. Tables.— Each table, with the legend above, should be placed on a separate manuscript page. Only the appropriate horizontal lines should be included. Use no footnotes; instead, include all information in the legend. Make notations in the text mar- gins to indicate the preferred location of tables in the printed text. Illustrations.— Original art work should be kept by the au- thor(s) until final acceptance for publication. All art work must be mounted on stiff board ready for reproduction. In line draw- ings, pay particular attention to width of lines and size of lettering when reductions are to be made by the printer. Mul- tiple photos assembled on a single plate should be mounted with only a minimum of space separating them. In the case of multiple illustrations mounted together, each illustration must be numbered sequentially rather than given an alphabetic se- quence. Written on the back should be the name(s) ofauthor(s), an indication of top edge, and whether the art work should be returned. The overall dimensions should be no more than 1 1 inches (28 cm) x 14 inches (36 cm). Larger drawings present greater difficulty in shipping and greater risks of damage for which the JOA assumes no responsibility. The author is en- couraged to consider PMT (PhotoMechanical Transfer) repro- ductions for large drawings and to consult an Editor for details on appropriate reductions. Make notations in the text margins to indicate the preferred position of illustrations in the printed text. Legends for illustrations should be placed together on the same page(s) and separate from the illustrations. Adhere to the following styles: Figures \-^.—A-us x-us, male from Timbuktu: 1, left leg; 2, right chelicera; 3, dorsal aspect of genitalia; 4, ventral aspect of abdomen. Figures 27-34.— Right chelicerae of species of A-us from Timbuktu: 27, 29, 3 1 , 33, dorsal views; 28, 30, 32, 34, prolater- al views of moveable finger, 27, 28, A-us x-us, holotype male; 29, 30, A-us, w-us, holotype male; 31, 32, A-us z-us, holotyjje male; 33, 34, A-us y-us, male. Scales = 1.0 mm. Assemble manuscript for mailing.— Assemble the separate sections or pages in the following sequence; title page, abstract, text, figure legends, footnotes, running head, tables with leg- ends, figures. Page charges and reprints.— The current charge per journal page will be assessed as follows: $50— nonmembers, $45 — members with grant, institutional, or other support for page costs; $25 —regular members who do not have support for page costs; $20— student members who do not author with full members and who do not have support. Reprints are available only from the printer at current costs. Waiver of Page Charges.— The Editor will consider requests for a waiver of page charges for manuscripts which have been accepted for publication. Requests should be made in writing and should be submitted to the Associate Editor along with the final revision of the manuscript. The author must certify that neither grant nor institutional funds are available to cover all of the publication costs. The Society will normally agree to waive up to a maximum of 80% of the page charges, contingent on the availability of funds; the author is expected to find alternative sources for the remainder. RESEARCH NOTES Instructions above pertaining to feature articles apply also to research notes except that abstracts and most headings are not used and the byline follows the Literature Cited section. CONTENTS THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY VOLUME 19 Feature Articles NUMBER 3 Segregation studies of isozyme variation in Metaphidippus galathea (Ara- neae, Salticidae), William W. M. Steiner and Matthew H. Greenstone 157 Two new species of Nesticus spiders from the southern Appalachians (Ara- neae, Nesticidae), Frederick A. Coyle and Augustus C. McGarity ... 161 Evidence for idiothetically controlled turns and extraocular photoreception in lycosid spiders, Jerome S. Rovner 169 Hawaiian spiders of the genus Tetragnatha: I. Spiny leg clade, Rosemary G. Gillespie 174 Mitochondrial DNA sequences coding for a portion of the RNA of the small ribosomal subunits of Tetragnatha mandibulata and Tetragnatha hawaiensis (Araneae, Tetragnathidae), Henrietta B. Croom, Rosemary G. Gillespie and Stephen R. Palumbi 210 Segmental anomalies in Roncus aff. lubricus (Neobisiidae, Pseudoscor- piones) from Yugoslavia, B. P. M. Curcic, R. N. Dimitrijevic, O. S. Karamata and L. R. Lucic 215 Research Notes An example of abnormal carapaco-abdominal fusion in Neobisium aff. fuscimanum (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae), Bozidar P. M. Curcic and Rajko N. Dimitrijevic 225 In vitro post-dispersal burrow sharing among spiderling Geolycosa turricola (Araneae, Lycosidae), Gary L. Miller 227 Homosexual mating behavior in male Doryonychus raptor (Araneae, Tetragnathidae), Rosemary G. Gillespie 229 Response of Nephila clavipes to mock predation changes with the proximity of the molt. Linden Higgins 231 Book Reviews The Insects and Arachnids of Canada. Part 17. The Wolf Spiders, Nursery- web Spiders, and Lynx Spiders of Canada and Alaska (by Charles D. Dondale and James H. Redner), Charles E. Griswold 233 Fauna of Spiders of Southeastern Siberia (by M. V. Izmailova), Yuri Marusik and Victor Fet 235 a The Journal of ARACHNOLOGY \ OFFICIAL ORGAN OF THE AMERICAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 20 ■^^\THS0A///q7f\ I dUG ? 6 IVj- ^ j 1992 number 1 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY EDITOR: James W. Berry, Butler University ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Gary L. Miller, The University of Mississippi EDITORIAL BOARD: A. Cady, Miami (Ohio) Univ. at Middletown; J. E. Carrel, Univ. Missouri; J. A. Coddington, National Mus. Natural Hist.; J. C. Cokendolpher, Lubbock, Texas; F. A. Coyle, Western Carolina Univ.; C. D. Don- dale, Agriculture Canada; W. G. Eberhard, Univ. Costa Rica; M. E. Galiano, Mus. Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; M. H. Greenstone, BCIRL, Columbia, Missouri; N. V. Horner, Midwestern State Univ.; D. T. Jennings, Garland, Maine; V. F. Lee, California Acad. Sci.; H. W. Levi, Harvard Univ.; E. A. Maury, Mus. Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; N. L Platnick, American Mus. Natural Hist.; G. A. Polls, Vanderbilt Univ.; S. E. Riechert, Univ. Tennessee; A. L. Rypstra, Miami Univ., Ohio; M. H. Robinson, U.S. National Zool. Park; W. A. Shear, Hampden-Sydney Coll.; G. W. Uetz, Univ. Cincinnati; C. E. Valerio, Univ. Costa Rica. The Journal of Arachnology (ISSN 0160-8202), a publication devoted to the study of Arachnida, is published three times each year by The American Arach- nological Society. Memberships (yearly): Membership is open to all those inter- ested in Arachnida. Subscriptions to The Journal of Arachnology and American Arachnology (the newsletter), and annual meeting notices, are included with mem- bership in the Society. Regular, $30; Students, $20; Institutional, $80 (USA) or $90 (all other countries). Inquiries should be directed to the Membership Secretary (see below). Back Issues: Susan E. Riechert, Department of Zoology, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37916 USA. Undelivered Issues: Allen Press, Inc., 1041 New Hampshire Street, P.O. Box 368, Lawrence, Kansas 66044 USA. THE AMERICAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY PRESIDENT: Allen R. Brady (1991-1993), Biology Department, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49423 USA. PRESIDENT-ELECT: James E. Carico (1991-1993), Department of Biology, Lynchburg College, Lynchburg, Virginia 24501 USA. MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY: Norman 1. Platnick (appointed), American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, New York 10024 USA. TREASURER: Gail E. Stratton (1991-1993), Department of Biology, Albion College, Albion, Michigan 49224 USA. SECRETARY: Brent Opell (1991-1993), Department of Biology, Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 2406 1 USA. ARCHIVIST: Vincent D. Roth, Box 136, Portal, Arizona 85632 USA. DIRECTORS: Matthew H. Greenstone (1990-1992), George W. Uetz (1991- 1993), Charles E. Griswold (1991-1993). HONORARY MEMBERS: C. D. Dondale, W. J. Gertsch, H. Homann, H. W. Levi, A. F. Millidge, M. Vachon, T. Yaginuma. Cover illustration: SEM photomicrograph of the ocularium of the opilionid Odiellus pictus (Wood). The species has a prominent trident of spines at the anterior border of its cephalothorax. Found in the eastern United States. Photo by Steven Murphree. Publication date: 14 August 1992 THIS PUBLICATION IS PRINTED ON ACID-FREE PAPER. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:1-17 HAWAIIAN SPIDERS OF THE GENUS TETRAGNATHA II. SPECIES FROM NATURAL AREAS OF WINDWARD EAST MAUI Rosemary G. Gillespie: Department of Zoology and Hawaiian Evolutionary Biology Program, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 USA ABSTRACT: The spider genus Tetragnatha is highly speciose in the Hawaiian Islands, diverse in morphology, ecology and behavior. The present study describes the distribution of 1 3 species of the genus from natural areas on the windward northern and eastern sections of Haleakala volcano, Maui, primarily in the Nature Conservancy of Hawaii’s Waikamoi Preserve and Haleakala National Park. Six species do not build webs, and have recently been described; the remainder all build webs. The description of six new web-building species, T. thtuberculata n. sp.,r. eurychasma n. sp., T. acuta n. sp., T. filiciphilia n. sp., T. stelarobusta n. sp., T. paludicola n. sp., is the primary focus of this paper. Spiders are one of the primary predatory groups in Hawaiian ecosystems. Systematic studies on the group, however, are very limited (Karsch 1880; Simon 1900; Suman 1964, 1970; Okuma 1988). The most comprehensive work was that of Simon (1900), who worked on a small collec- tion of Hawaiian spiders made by R. C. L. Per- kins (Perkins 1913). Of all spider groups repre- sented in the Hawaiian Islands, those of the genus Tetragnatha are the most conspicuous, and per- haps also the most widespread. Outside Hawaii, representatives of the genus Tetragnatha are among the more homogeneous of spider genera in both morphology (elongate bodies and legs, and large chelicerae and endites [Kaston 1948; Levi 1981]) and ecology (Da- browska Prot & Luczak 1968a, b; Dabrowska Prot et al. 1968). In Hawaii, however, the highly speciose genus is diverse in morphology, ecology and behavior. Preliminary morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses (Croom, Gilles- pie & Palumbi in prep.) suggest that there are distinct clades of Hawaiian tetragnathids, each with its own unique set of characteristics. This paper documents 13 representatives of the genus from two natural areas in the windward northern and eastern sections of the east Maui volcano, Haleakala: the Nature Conservancy of Hawaii’s Waikamoi Preserve and Haleakala Na- tional Park, the two areas abutting each other to form an almost continuous swathe of native for- est. The current systematic treatment is intended to allow future publications on research I have conducted on the ecology and behavior of the species in these areas. Two additional sites on windward Haleakala (Pohakuokala Gulch to the west and Hanawi Valley to the NE) were sur- veyed to determine the distribution of the 13 species across the mountain. Haleakala National Park comprises a broad strip of land (1 1,400 ha) running from sea level in the east to the summit of Haleakala (3057 m) in the west, part of its western edge bordering the Waikamoi Preserve. The Preserve (2117 ha) continues west (NW) from this border (2653 m) running down to 1 340 m. Average annual rainfall is generally high, increasing along a steep west- to-east gradient from 2000 mm to 5000 mm, with some areas exceeding 10,000 mm. The site surveyed in Hanawi Valley, which lies to the north of the National Park, was at 463 m. Po- hakuokala Gulch, to the west of the National Park, was surveyed at 1524 m. The vegetation in the National Park changes from disturbed Koa/’Ohi’a {Acacia koa/Metros- ideros polymorpha) lowland wet forest in the east, up through more pristine Koa/’Ohi’a stands to ’Ohi’a montane wet forest interspersed with montane bogs in the west (Wagner et al, 1990; Medeiros, pers. comm.). In the Preserve, the veg- etation changes from the ’Ohi’a montane wet forest at the border with the National Park, to Koa/’Ohi’a montane mesic forest in the west. The site examined at Hanawi is disturbed ’Ohi’a lowland wet forest, while Pohakuokala is dis- turbed Koa montane mesic forest. The dominant plants vary according to forest type, but the most common tree species are A. koa and M. poly- morpha, as well as Clermontia arborescens. Ilex anomala, Cheirodendron trigymim, Myrsine spp. and Pelea spp. A number of species of ferns, in particular Cibotium spp. dominate the understo- 1 2 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY ry, along with Vaccinium calycinum, Broussaisia arguta, Rubus hawaiensis and Alyxia oliviformis. Of the 13 species of Tetragnatha found in the Waikamoi Preserve and Haleakala National Park, six species do not build webs, and are considered in the Spiny Leg Clade of Hawaiian Tetragnatha, which has recently been described (Gillespie 1991). The other species form a diverse group of web-builders from an unknown number of clades, the description of which is the main focus of this paper. Five of these species are described from specimens collected in the Waikamoi Pre- serve. T. paludicola is described from specimens collected from the bogs on the north east rift of Haleakala (1676 m) in Haleakala National Park. METHODS Specimens were examined for both gross mor- phological features as well as for more detailed structure in the same manner as that used for other Hawaiian Tetragnatha (Gillespie 1991). I followed the terminology for cheliceral armature used by Okuma (1987, 1988). In males, the teeth on the promargin generally include ‘Gu’, a small distal tubercle; ‘sP, the first major tooth; ‘T’, the second (usually larger) tooth; and ‘rsu’, the re- maining proximal teeth on the promargin. The teeth on the retromargin generally include ‘AXF, a small distal tubercle; ‘GF, the first major tooth, ‘L2’ the second ‘L3’ the third etc. ‘a’ is the dorsal cheliceral spur. For females, the cheliceral teeth are numbered from the distal end ‘Ul’— ‘U«’ on the promargin and ‘LI’ — ‘L«’ on the retromar- gin. NON-WEB-BUILDING SPECIES (SPINY LEG CLADE) Tetragnatha brevignatha Gillespie Tetragnatha brevignatha, a member of the Green Spiny Leg group in the Spiny Leg clade, was found only in a small section of mid-ele- vation (1340 m) mesic forest on northern Ha- leakala, in the NW comer of the Waikamoi Pre- serve (Table 1). Tetragnatha waikamoi Gillespie Tetragnatha waikamoi, a second member of the Green Spiny Leg group, was found only in montane wet forest of northern Haleakala from 1310 m to 1876 m (Table 1). It was therefore abundant in the more northern Waikamoi Pre- serve, the only other place it was found being the bogs on the NE Rift of Haleakala in the National Park. To the west, the range of this species over- laps with T. brevignatha in a very narrow zone; to the east, the range comes close to that of T. macracantha, but no overlap zone has yet been found. Tetragnatha macracantha Gillespie Tetragnatha macracantha, the final member of the Green Spiny Leg group in this region, was found throughout the Kipahulu Valley of Hale- akala National Park, from the lowest (610 m) to the highest (1980 m) elevations (Table 1). In ad- dition, it was found in the lowland disturbed forest of Hanawi at 463 m. As mentioned, its range comes close to, but has not been found to overlap, that of T. waikamoi. Tetragnatha kamakou Gillespie Tetragnatha kamakou, a member of the Green and Red Spiny Leg group in the Spiny Leg clade, was found throughout montane wet forest of Ha- leakala National Park and the Waikamoi Pre- serve from 610 m to 1980 m (Table 1). Tetragnatha quasimodo Gillespie Tetragnatha quasimodo was found in abun- dance in both mesic and wet forests from the lowest (610 m) to the highest (1980 m) elevations in Haleakala National Park and the Waikamoi Preserve, as well as in Hanawi Valley and Po- hakuokala Gulch (Table 1). Tetragnatha restricta Simon Tetragnatha restricta was found in mesic forest at all elevations (610 m to 1524 m) in Haleakala National Park, the Waikamoi Preserve and Po- hakuokala Gulch (Table 1). WEB-BUILDING SPECIES Tetragnatha olindana Karsch T. olindana was found only in low elevation (610 m) wet forest, in Hanawi and the Kipahulu Valley of Haleakala National Park (Table 1). Tetragnatha trituberculata, new species (Figs. 1-14, 85) Types. — Holotype male and allotype female from Waikamoi Gulch, Waikamoi, 1310 m, Maui Island (7 January 1991), collected by D. J. Pres- ton, deposited in the Bishop Museum, Honolulu. GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETR.4GNATHA 3 Table 1. — Distribution of species in the natural areas of windward east Maui. Locations are ordered from west (Pohakuokala, 1524 m) to east (Kipahulu Valley at 610 m). Poha- Waikamoi Preserve Hale. Nat. Pk. N.E. Haleakala National Park Elevation (m) kala Olinda ruthers manu Bogs Hanawi Kipahulu Valley 1524 1340 1876 1585 1676 463 1980 1524 1220 914 610 T. waikamoi Male 1 4 2 1 Fern 8 13 3 11 Imm 9 10 20 8 T. brevignatha Male 15 Fern 12 Imm 8 T. macracantha Male 2 2 1 4 6 16 Fern 4 3 2 2 7 14 Imm 13 2 11 29 45 31 T. kamakou Male 1 4 4 2 1 Fern 5 9 3 9 1 2 Imm 5 30 7 20 13 3 1 T. quasimodo Male 10 5 1 2 4 Fern 3 5 9 3 1 1 7 3 4 10 6 Imm 6 12 20 2 2 3 4 4 18 14 T. restricta Male 1 3 3 Fern 1 6 2 1 Imm 2 3 4 T. olindana Male 4 1 2 2 Fern 5 1 12 7 Imm 35 2 25 10 T. trituber- Male 1 6 1 1 culata Fern 1 1 3 6 2 3 Imm 5 2 4 2 9 T. eurychasma Male 1 7 2 2 1 1 1 Fern 1 5 2 4 3 8 4 2 3 Imm 1 8 9 6 5 4 1 3 T. acuta Male 2 1 Fern 1 1 8 1 1 Imm 6 2 T. filiciphilia Male 7 1 Fern 11 1 2 Imm 8 6 2 T. stelarobusta Male 6 6 1 1 Fern 11 6 3 4 Imm 10 6 4 2 T. paludicola Male 5 2 Fern 16 5 5 Imm 2 10 17 2 4 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures \-\A.— Tetragnatha thtuherculata\ Male holotype. 1) Promargin of right chelicera; 2) Retromargin of left chelicera; 3) Dorsal spur of right chelicera, lateral view; 4) carapace, dorsal view; 5) Right leg I, dorsal view; 6) Right leg III, prolateral view; 7) Left palpus, prolateral view. Female allotype. 8) Promargin of right chelicera; 9) Retromargin of left chelicera; 10) Carapace, dorsal view; 11) Right leg I, dorsal view; 12) Right leg III, prolateral view; 13) abdomen, dorsal (a) and lateral (b) views; 14) Seminal receptacles, ventral view. Scale lines in mm. Scale of Figs. 1-3 indicated below 1; scale of Figs. 4, 8, 9, 10 indicated below 8; scale of Figs. 5, 6, 11, 12 indicated below 12. GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 5 Etymology.— Tri (Greek) three; tuberculum (Latin) tubercle. The specific epithet is used in its adjectival form and refers to the transverse procurved row of tubercles across the abdomen of this species. Diagnosis. — T. trituberculata is not easily con- fused with any other species. The most diagnostic feature is the series of transverse abdominal lobes, accentuated by the distinctive black pattern. Even where the abdominal tubercles are reduced (as in mature males), the pattern is highly diagnostic, and does not appear to fade in alcohol. Description.— //o/oiyppwa/e’.’ (Figs. 1-7). Pro- margin of chelicerae (Fig. 1): Distance between ‘Gu’, ‘sf and ‘T’ approximately equal, ratio of distal end to ‘sF: ‘sF to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsul’ 4:3:3. ‘Gu’ pronounced, small, cone-shaped tubercle; ‘sF medium-sized cone directed out perpendic- ular to margin of chelicerae; narrower than ‘T’ by 90% (70-90%), and shorter, 60% height (50- 60%). ‘T’ moderately tall, robust, rocket-shaped, ‘rsu’ 4 (3-4) spikes, ‘rsul’ and ‘rsu2’ diverging slightly along vertical plane. Retromargin of che- licerae (Fig. 2): Total of only 4 (up to 7) teeth. ‘AXF small, but conspicuous triangular notch; ‘GF strong, similar width and height to ‘L3’, ‘L4’ and ‘L5’, much stronger than ‘L2’. ‘L2’ set farther back into fang groove than other teeth on retro- margin. Dorsal spur long, shaped like slim, bent finger ( 1 4.0% length of cephalothorax); tip slight- ly longer on dorsal surface (Fig. 3). Cheliceral fang slightly shorter than base, bent sharply at both proximal and distal ends. Cephlothorax 2.5 mm, total length 5.6 mm. Chelicerae shorter (84%) than cephalothorax. Depression of tho- racic fovea distinctly marked with dark lines ra- diating out from center (Fig. 4). Leg spination similar to female (Figs. 5, 6). Femur I: 6 prola- teral, 5 dorsal, 6 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 3 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Meta- tarsus 1: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 4 dorsal, 1 prolateral, no ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 dorsal, 1 prolateral spine. Coloration and eye pattern similar to female. Conductor Tip: (Figs. 7 and 85). Smoothly rounded, almost symmetrical, high-peaked cap, terminating in small, downward-pointing, beak- like tip. Allotype female: (Figs. 8-14). Eye area heavily pigmented, distance between PME smaller than eye area itself (Fig. 1 0). Median ocular area wider posteriorly. Lateral eyes loosely contiguous. Pro- margin of chelicerae (Fig. 8): series of 7 teeth, ‘Ur very robust, considerably wider but shorter (66%) than ‘U2’; separated from ‘U2’ by 13% cheliceral length. ‘U2’-‘U7’ gradually decreasing in size proximally. Retromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 9): series of 5 teeth, ‘LI’ slightly shorter (90%) than ‘Ur, much smaller (69%) than ‘L2’. ‘LI’ contiguous with ‘L2’, teeth decreasing in size proximally. Cheliceral fang short, approximately 77% length of base, tapering to smooth point at distal end. Cephlothorax 2.9 mm, total length 7.6 mm. Chelicerae rather short, 60% length of cephalothorax. Legs heavily spotted, banded with dark brown (bottle green in life) on pale cream (Figs. 1 1-12). Spines short (19% length of ceph- alothorax) but robust. Femur I: 6 prolateral, 5 dorsal, 5 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 3 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 3 dorsal, 1 prolateral, no ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 dorsal spine, 1 prolateral spine. Cephlothorax pale brown, with a distinct fovea marked by very dark lines radiating out from center (Fig. 1 0). Sternum dusky black. Abdomen broad, deep, width and depth both approximately 35% of total length. Dorsum of abdomen green/brown (bright bottle- green in life), with distinct black markings (Fig. 13a). Transverse procurved row of three tuber- cles on abdomen, each accentuated by black marks bordering all except median border in lat- eral tubercles, and all sides (except for narrow proximal and distal “window”) on medial tu- bercle (Fig. 13b). Venter dark brown/black with 2 pairs of gold vertical bars on either side of midline. Seminal receptacles: (Fig. 14). Two bulbs linked in tight opposing “comma” shapes, each well sclerotized on medial border. Both bulbs equally dilated. Central portion a robust stalk between bulbs. Median lobe an angular balloon projecting from stalk, fitting snugly sandwiched between bulbs. Color polymorphism. — Little evidence of this. Material Examined. — This species is found in wet forest only, from 1220 m to 1890 m in Haleakala Na- tional Park and the Waikamoi Preserve (Table 1 ). Maui Island'. Haleakala. Honomanu Gulch, 1876 m, 29-V- 88, 22-VI-89 & 5-II-90 (R. G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); 1585 m, 6-II-90 (R. G. Gillespie). Waikamoi Gulch, 1310 m, 13-VIII-88 (R. G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); 7- 1-91 (D. J. Preston); Bogs, NE Rift Haleakala, 1,676 m, 15-1-88, 16-1 88, 17-I-88& 18-1-88 (R. G. Gillespie & A. C. Medeiros); Kipahulu Valley, 1220 m, 15-V- 90 (R. G. Gillespie & A. C. Medeiros); 1524 m, 14-V- 90 (R. G. Gillespie & A. C. Medeiros). 6 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 1 5-2S. — Tetragnatha eurychasma-, Male holotype. 15) Promargin of right chelicera; 16) Retromargin of left chelicera; 1 7) Dorsal spur of right chelicera, lateral view; 18) carapace, dorsal view; 19) Right leg I, dorsal view; 20) Right leg III, prolateral view; 21) Left palpus, prolateral view. Female allotype. 22) Promargin of right chelicera; 23) Retromargin of left chelicera; 24) Carapace, dorsal view; 25) Right leg I, dorsal view; 26) Right leg III, prolateral view; 27) abdomen, dorsal view; 28) Seminal receptacles, ventral view. Scale lines in mm. Scale of Figs. 15-18, 22-24 indicated below 23; scale of 19, 20, 25, 26 indicated below 25. Tetragnatha eurychasma, new species (Figs. 15-28, 86) Types. —Holotype male from Honomanu Gulch, Waikamoi, 1585 m, Maui Island (6 Feb- ruary 1990), collected by R. G. Gillespie; allo- type female from Carruther’s Camp, Honomanu Valley, Waikamoi, 1876 m, Maui Island (29 May 1988), collected by R. G. Gillespie and C. Par- rish, deposited in the Bishop Museum, Hono- lulu. Etymology. — Fury s (Greek) broad; chasma (Greek) cleft, opening. The specific epithet is used GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 1 in its adjectival form and refers to the web of the species, which, although of the basic tetragnathid type (fragile, open hub), has generally very large spaces {X = 1.38 cm, SD = 0.27, « = 8) between the radial lines. Diagnosis. — r. eurychasma is unlikely to be confused with other species from Waikamoi. Its distinctive black and silver coloration and smoothly oval abdomen are characteristic of live specimens. In alcohol, the most distinctive fea- tures are its abdominal pattern, short leg spines and cheliceral armature. Description.— male: (Figs. 15-21). Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 15): Distance be- tween ‘Gu’ and ‘si’ much greater than ‘si’ and ‘T’, ratio of distal end to ‘si’: ‘si’ to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsul’ 5:3:2. ‘Gu’ very small, inconspicuous, flat- topped tubercle; ‘si’ sharp, wedge directed slight- ly downwards towards ‘T’; narrower than ‘T’, by 63% (53-65%), and shorter, 53% (40-55%) height. ‘T’ moderately tall, directed perpendicular from margin of chelicerae, but curved slightly up to- wards ‘si’, ‘rsu’ 3 (up to 5) spikes, ‘rsuF slightly closer to ‘T’ than to ‘rsu2’. Retromargin of che- licerae (Fig. 16): Total of 8 (7) teeth. ‘AXl’ small, almost square notch; ‘Gl’ strong, much taller than all other teeth on retromargin; ‘L3’ next in size, ‘L2’ smaller, remainder of teeth considerably smaller than ‘L2’. Dorsal spur long, shaped like slim, bent finger ( 1 5.7% length of cephalothorax, 15.5-15.8%); tip pointed, upper margin project- ing slightly beyond lower (Fig. 17). Cheliceral fang considerably shorter than base, bent sharply at proximal end and curved slightly at distal end. Cephlothorax 1.7 mm (1.7-1. 8), total length 3.0 mm (2.9-3. 1). Chelicerae shorter (70%, 70-71%) than cephalothorax. Cephalothoracic pattern a distinct, dark flask shape, constricted at thoracic fovea (Fig. 1 8). Leg spination similar to female (Figs. 19, 20). Femur I: 4 prolateral, 3 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 3 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 3 dor- sal, no ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 dorsal spine. Coloration and eye pattern similar to female. Conductor Tip: (Figs. 21 and 86). High-peaked cap, leading out to narrow, straight, horizontal projection (width similar to cap) which termi- nates in small, downward-pointing, beak-like tip. Allotype female: (Fig. 22-28). PME separated by less than half width of PME (Fig. 24). Median ocular area almost square. Lateral eyes loosely contiguous. Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 22): series of 6 teeth, ‘U 1 ’ moderate size, similar in width, but shorter (66%) than ‘U2’; separated from ‘U2’ by 13% cheliceral length. ‘U2’-‘U6’ gradually decreasing in size proximally. Retro- margin of chelicerae (Fig. 23): series of 6 teeth, ‘LI’ slightly shorter (90%) than ‘Ul’, much smaller (69%) than ‘L2’. ‘LI’ contiguous with ‘L2’, teeth decreasing in size proximally. Cheli- ceral fang short, approximately 64% length of base, tapering to smooth point at distal end. Cephlothorax 1 .8 mm, total length 5.4 mm. Che- licerae short, 50% length of cephalothorax. Legs almost uniformly brown. Spines small, rather in- conspicuous ( 1 9% length of cephalothorax). Fe- mur I: 4 prolateral, 3 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 3 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines (Fig. 25). Femur III: 2 dorsal, no ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 dorsal spine (Fig. 26). Ceph- lothorax pale brown; fovea distinctly marked by dark area, lines running short distances from an- terior and posterior margins, broader lines run- ning forward from anterior lateral margins to lateral eyes (Fig. 24). Sternum uniformly pale tan. Abdomen smoothly elongate oval, width and depth both approximately 22% of total length. Dorsum of abdomen silvery, with wide, longi- tudinal medial dark bar (slightly undulating mar- gins) running down length (Fig. 27). Venter pale tan with 2 pairs of gold spots on either side of midline. Seminal receptacles: (Fig. 28). Upper bulb oval, set at 45° to main angle of body, lower bulb shaped like “top”, upper border peaked. Two bulbs linked in opposing “C” shapes, lower bulb slight- ly smaller, projecting slightly farther out than upper. Bulbs joined by rather long, curved stalk. Median lobe an irregular balloon projecting from stalk fitting well inside area defined by bulbs. Color polymorphism. — Little evidence of this. Material Examined. — This species is found through- out wet forests of Haleakala National Park and the Waikamoi Preserve, but is most abundant at higher elevations (Table 1). Maui Island: Haleakala. Hono- manu Gulch, 1876 m, 29-V-88, 22-VI-89 & 5-II-90 (R. G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); 1585 m, 6-II-90 (R. G. Gillespie). Waikamoi Gulch, 1310 m, 13-VIII-88 (R. G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); 7-1-9 1 (D. J. Preston). Opana Gulch, 1 340 m, 8-VI-88 (R. G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); 8-II-90 (R. G. Gillespie & J. Burgett). Hanawi Valley, 1340 m, 9-II-90 (R. G. Gillespie & R. Rydell). Bogs, NE Rift Haleakala, 1676 m, 15-1-88, 16-1 88, 17-1-88 & 18-1-88 (R. G. Gillespie & A. C. Medeiros); Kipa- hulu Valley, 610 m, 17-V-90, 914 m, 16-V-90, 1220 m, 15-V-90, 1524 m, 14-V-90 (R. G. Gillespie & A. C. Medeiros). THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 29-42. — Tetragnat ha acuta-, Male holotype. 29) Promargin of right chelicera; 30) Retromargin of left chelicera; 31) Dorsal spur of right chelicera, lateral view; 32) carapace, dorsal view; 33) Right leg I, dorsal view; 34) Right leg III, prolateral view; 35) Left palpus, prolateral view. Female allotype. 36) Promargin of right chelicera; 37) Retromargin of left chelicera; 38) Carapace, dorsal view; 39) Right leg I, dorsal view; 40) Right leg III, prolateral view; 41) abdomen, dorsal (a) and lateral (b) views; 42) Seminal receptacles, ventral view. Scale lines in mm. Scale of Figs. 29-32, 36-38 indicated below 36; scale of 33, 34, 39, 40 indicated beside 40. Tetragnatha acuta, new species (Figs. 29-42) Types. — Holotype male from Honomanu Val- ley, Waikamoi, 1 585 m, Maui Island (6 February 1990), collected by R. G. Gillespie; allotype fe- male from Opana Gulch, Waikamoi, 1340 m, Maui Island (8 February 1990), collected by R. G. Gillespie and J. Burgett, deposited in the Bish- op Museum, Honolulu. Etymology.— Acuta (Latin) acutely angled. The GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 9 specific epithet is used in its adjectival form and refers to the high, pointed abdomen of this spe- cies. Diagnosis.— The dark brown/black coloration with transverse lines, and the single medial tu- bercle on the abdomen are highly distinctive for T. acuta. Description.— //o/oiype male: (Fig. 29-35). Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 29): Distance be- tween ‘Gu’, ‘sF and ‘T’ approximately equal, ra- tio of distal end to ‘sF: ‘sF to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsuF 3: 3:3. ‘Gu’ pronounced, small, rounded tubercle; ‘sF wedge-shaped, directed downwards towards ‘T’; narrower than ‘T’, by 69%, and shorter, 49% height. ‘T’ moderately tall, directed almost per- pendicular from cheliceral margin, ‘rsu’ series of 4 spikes. Retromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 30): To- tal of only 6 teeth. ‘AXF small, pointed cone; ‘GF strong, much stronger than all other teeth on retromargin; ‘L2’ and ‘L3’ short and robust; ‘L4’ and ‘L5’ taller and narrower. Dorsal spur shaped like thick, bent finger (18.8% length of cephalothorax); tip minutely bifurcate (Fig. 31). Cheliceral fang considerably shorter than base, bent sharply at proximal end and curved at distal end. Cephlothorax 2.2 mm, total length 5. 1 mm. Chelicerae shorter (80%) than cephalothorax. Cephalothorax very dark, with darker margins, and dark “V” shape leading into thoracic fovea (Fig. 32). Legs banded, spination similar to fe- male (Figs. 33-34). Femur I: 3 prolateral, 2 dor- sal, 3 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 3 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 pro- lateral, 1 dorsal, 1 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 4 dorsal, no ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 dorsal, 1 prolateral spine. Coloration and eye pattern sim- ilar to female. Conductor Tip: (Fig. 35). High-peaked cap, curved sharply, leading out to narrow, straight, horizontal projection of similar width to cap, which terminates in rounded, blunt tip. Allotype female: (Figs. 36-42). PME separated by just more than half width of PME (Fig. 38). Median ocular area almost square. Lateral eyes well separated. Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 36): series of 7 teeth, ‘UT rather small, upwardly directed cone, much smaller (45% length) than ‘U2’; widely separated from ‘U2’ by 26% cheli- ceral length. ‘U2’-‘U7’ gradually decreasing in size proximally. Retromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 37): series of 6 teeth, ‘LI’ slightly taller (147%) than ‘Ur and similar in size (95%) to ‘L2’. ‘LI’ well separated from ‘L2’; rest of teeth on retro- margin of similar height. Cheliceral fang short, approximately 69% length of base, tapering to smooth point at distal end. Cephlothorax 2.3 mm, total length 5.8 mm. Chelicerae moderately short, 62% length of cephalothorax. Legs with wide proximal, medial and distal dark bands (Figs. 39-40). Spines small, rather inconspicuous (18% length of cephalothorax). Femur I: 4 pro- lateral, 2 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 3 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Meta- tarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 1 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 3 dorsal, 1 prolateral, no ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 dorsal, 1 prolateral spine. Cephalo- thorax very dark, with darker margins, and dark “V” shape leading into thoracic fovea (Fig. 38). Sternum dark brown or black. Abdomen quite broad (width approximately 42% of total length), very deep (depth approximately 57% of total length) (Fig. 41b). Dorsum of abdomen dark gray/ brown, with variable transverse markings, much more heavily marked on posterior margin, where tines converge upwards towards single, pointed, medial tubercle (Fig. 41a). Venter with rather broad black line running longitudinally down midline, bordered along length by paler stripes. Seminal receptacles: (Fig. 42). Two bulbs spherical-to-oval, upper rather boxing-glove- shaped, lower round. Linked by rather long stalk running almost horizontally. Each bulb fairly well sclerotized on medial border. Both bulbs equally dilated. Median lobe small balloon shape (small- er than bulbs) projecting from stalk, situated in free space between widely separated bulbs. Color polymorphism.— The color and extent of patterning in this species is highly variable. Some species have a medial bar (pink, brown or black, but darker than the base color) running longitudinally from the anterior edge of the ab- domen to the midline; in others this is absent. All specimens examined to date have some form of transverse line running across the midline, converging on the medial protuberance. Also variable transverse bars posterior to the midline. Material Examined. — This species is scattered throughout Haleakala National Park and the Waika- moi Preserve, rarely abundant (Table 1). Maui Island: Haleakala. Honomanu Gulch, 1585 m, 6-II-90 (R.G. Gillespie). Opana Gulch, 1340 m, 8-VI-88 (R. G. Gil- lespie & C. Parrish); 8-II-90 (R.G. Gillespie & J. Bur- gett). Hanawi Valley, 1340 m, 9-II-90 (R. G. Gillespie & R. Rydell). Bogs, NE Rift Haleakala, 1676 m, 15-1- 88, 16-1 88, 17-1-88 & 18-1-88 (R. G. Gillespie & A. C. Medeiros). Kipahulu Valley, 1980 m, 27-IV-88 (R. G. Gillespie & A. C. Medeiros). 1 0 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 43-56. — Tetmgnatha filiciphilia\ Male holotype. 43) Promargin of right chelicera; 44) Retromargin of left chelicera; 45) Dorsal spur of right chelicera, lateral view; 46) carapace, dorsal view; 47) Right leg I, dorsal view; 48) Right leg III, prolateral view; 49) Left palpus, prolateral view. Female allotype. 50) Promargin of right chelicera; 51) Retromargin of left chelicera; 52) Carapace, dorsal view; 53) Right leg I, dorsal view; 54) Right leg III, prolateral view; 55) abdomen, dorsal view; 56) Seminal receptacles, ventral view. Scale lines in mm. Scale of Figs. 43-45, 50, 51 indicated below 50; scale of 46, 52 indicated below 52; scale of 47, 48, 53, 54 indicated beside 53. Tetragnatha filiciphilia, new species (Figs. 43-56, 87) Types. — Holotype male and allotype female from Waikamoi Gulch, Waikamoi, 1310m, Maui Island (8 July 1988), collected by R. G. Gillespie and C. Parrish, deposited in the Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Etymology.— Filix (Latin) fern; philia (Greek) affinity for. The specific epithet is used in its adjectival form and refers to the tendency of this GILLESPIE-HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA species to build its web under the fronds of ferns, of which tree ferns are one of the dominant groups. Diagnosis. — In life, T. feliciphilia is immedi- ately recognizable on the basis of its distinctive green coloration, with the medial red bar on the posterior of the abdomen. It might be confused with members of the Green Spiny Leg clade, al- though inspection of the legs, with their few, small and weak spines (appear almost smooth to the naked eye) readily indicates its lack of allegiance to this clade. Specimens preserved in alcohol might be confused with T. eurychasma, but is easily recognized by the lack of paired gold spots on the venter. Also, the (apparent) lack of any distinct abdominal pattern, the pale coloration of the cephalothorax, and (in males) the cheli- ceral armature readily identifies T. feliciphilia. Description.— Holotype male: (Figs. 43-49). Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 43): Distance be- tween distal margin, ‘sP and ‘T’ approximately equal, ratio of distal end to ‘si’: ‘sF to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsul’ 4:3:3 (3:3:4). ‘Gu’ absent, represented only by few strong hairs; ‘sF medium-sized cone di- rected out perpendicular to margin of chelicerae; narrower than ‘T’, by 61% (60-95%), much shorter, 51% height (50-55%). ‘T’ moderately tall, robust, rocket-shaped, leaning slightly up towards ‘sF. ‘rsu’ 4 straight spikes perpendicular to margin of chelicerae. Retromargin of chelic- erae (Fig. 44): Total of 7 (6) teeth. ‘AXF absent; ‘GF stronger than any other tooth on retromar- gin. Dorsal spur short, shaped like straight finger (9.6% length of cephalothorax, 9.5-10.0%); tip a single, slightly blunt, point (Fig. 45). Cheliceral fang considerably shorter than base, bent at prox- imal end, slightly curved at distal end. Cephlo- thorax 1.6 mm (1.4-1. 7), total length 3.9 mm (3.0-4.0). Chelicerae much shorter (67%, 60-68%) than cephalothorax. Cephalothorax pale yellow, darker at depression of thoracic fovea, where dark lines radiate forwards and laterally from sides towards margin of cephalothorax (Fig. 46). Leg spination similar to female (Figs. 47-48). Femur I: 3 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 2 dorsal, 1 prolateral spines, no ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 dorsal, 1 prolateral spine. Coloration and eye pattern similar to fe- male. Conductor Tip: (Figs. 49, 87). Moderately high, rather pointed cap, drawn out laterally into nar- row, straight, almost horizontal projection of 11 similar width to cap, which terminates in slightly beaked, blunt tip. Allotype female: (Figs. 50-56). PME separated by approximately half width of PME (Fig. 52). Median ocular area wider posteriorly. Lateral eyes contiguous. Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 50): series of 6 teeth, ‘U 1 ’ medium sized, much small- er (50% height) than ‘U2’; widely separated from ‘U2’ by 24% cheliceral length. ‘U2’-‘U6’ grad- ually decreasing in size proximally. Retromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 51): series of 7 teeth, ‘LI’ taller (128%) than ‘Ul’, slightly smaller (91%) than ‘L2’. ‘LL, ‘L2’ and ‘L3’ well separated, ‘L2’ and ‘L3’ largest teeth on retromargin. ‘L4’-‘L7’ rather small and close together. Cheliceral fang short, approximately 80% length of base, tapering to smooth point at distal end. Cephlothorax 1.7 mm, total length 4.8 mm. Chelicerae rather short, 62% length of cephalothorax. Legs uniformly pale yellow. Spines very small and inconspicuous ( 1 5% length of cephalothorax). Femur I (Fig. 53): 3 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III (Fig. 54): 2 dorsal, 1 prolateral, no ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 dorsal spine. Ceph- alothorax pale yellow, with darker lines from an- tero-lateral margins of cephalothorax converging broadly towards fovea. Sternum uniformly pale yellow to brown. Abdomen elongate oval, some- times slightly domed, width and depth both ap- proximately 23% of total length (Fig. 55). Dor- sum of abdomen almost uniformly speckled silver, iridescent lime green in life, with broad, conspicuous medial red bar running from just behind midline to posterior margin of abdomen. Venter silvery with broad medial longitudinal brown bar, expanded anterior to epigastric fur- row. Seminal receptacles: (Fig. 56). Upper bulb elongate-oval, at about 45° to body axis; lower bulb round-oval. Each bulb has fairly well scler- otized medial border. Both bulbs dilated, but lower smaller than upper. Median lobe angular and irregular doughnut-shape arising from stalk between fairly widely separated bulbs. Color polymorphism. — Little evidence of this. Material Examined.— This species occurs at mid and lower elevations in Haleakala National Park and Wai- kamoi Preserve (Table 1). Maui Island: Haleakala. Waikamoi Gulch, 1310 m, 8-VII-88 & 13-VIII-88 (R. G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); 7-1-9 1 . Opana Gulch, 1 340 m, 9-IV-88 & 26-V-88 (R. G. Gillespie); 8-VI-88 (R. G. Gillespie & C. Parrish) & 8-II-90 (R. G. Gillespie 12 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 51-10. — Tetragnat ha stelarobusta-, Male holotype. 57) Promargin of right chelicera; 58) Retromargin of left chelicera; 59) Dorsal spur of right chelicera, lateral view; 60) carapace, dorsal view; 61) Right leg I, dorsal view; 62) Right leg III, prolateral view; 63) Left palpus, prolateral view. Female allotype. 64) Promargin of right chelicera; 65) Retromargin of left chelicera; 66) Carapace, dorsal view; 67) Right leg I, dorsal view; 68) Right leg III, prolateral view; 69) abdomen, dorsal view; 70) Seminal receptacles, ventral view. Scale lines in mm. Scale of Figs. 57-59, 64, 65 indicated below 65; scale of 60, 66 indicated below 66; scale of 61, 62, 67, 68 indicated beside 68. & J. Burgett). Kipahulu Valley, 914 m, 16-V-90, 1220 m, 15-V-90 (R. G. Gillespie & A. C. Medeiros). Tetragnatha stelarobusta, new species (Figs. 57-70, 88, 89) Types. — Holotype male from Waikamoi Gulch, Waikamoi, 1 340 m, Maui Island ( 1 2 July 1988), collected by R. G. Gillespie; allotype fe- male from Waikamoi Gulch, Haleakala, 1310m, Maui Island (13 August 1988), collected by R. G. Gillespie, deposited in the Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Etymology.— Stele (Greek) cylinder; robustus GILLESPIE-HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 13 (Latin) robust. The specific epithet is used in its adjectival form and refers to the robust cylin- drical abdomen with longitudinal striping. Diagnosis. — r. stelarobusta can be recognized by its elongate, cigar shape, the distinctive ce- phalothoracic pattern (especially the medial pale line), its large size and brown coloration with a pattern that is longitudinal, never transverse. Description.— //otovpe’ male: (Figs. 57-63). Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 57): Distance be- tween ‘Gu’ and ‘si’ slightly greater than that be- tween ‘si’ and ‘T’, ratio of distal end to ‘si’: ‘si’ to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsuT 4:3:4 (4:3:3). ‘Gu’ broad, ro- bust, rounded tubercle; ‘sF rather small, narrow (medium-width) cone directed out perpendicular to margin of chelicerae; narrower (by 30%, 30- 60%) and shorter (by 44% height, 40-45%) than ‘T’. ‘T’ tall, very robust, rocket-shaped, leaning very slightly up towards ‘sF. ‘rsu’ 4 (5) narrow, straight spike perpendicular to margin of chelic- erae. Retromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 58): Total of 9 (6-9) teeth. ‘AXF robust, rounded tubercle; ‘GF very wide and robust, much stronger than any other tooth on retromargin. Dorsal spur long, shaped like curved finger (15.5% length of ceph- alothorax); tip broad, very blunt, with evidence of minute bifurcation (Fig. 59). Cheliceral fang slightly shorter than base, bent at both proximal and distal ends. Cephalothorax 3.0 mm (2.7- 3.0), total length 7.4 mm (7. 0-7. 5). Chelicerae shorter (80%, 70-80%) than cephalothorax. Ce- phalothoracic markings similar to female (Fig. 60). Leg spination similar to female (Figs. 61- 62). Femur I: 5 prolateral, 4 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 3 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 retrola- teral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 3 dorsal, 2 pro- lateral, no ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 dorsal, 1 prolateral spine. Coloration and eye pattern sim- ilar to female. Conductor Tip: (Figs. 63, 88, 89). Broad, low, rounded cap, almost symmetrical, but drawn out laterally into moderately narrow, straight, pro- jection of similar width to cap, which terminates in spatulate, slightly beaked, blunt tip. Allotype female: (Figs. 64-70). PME separated by just over half width of PME (Fig. 66). Median ocular area almost square. Lateral eyes very loosely contiguous. Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 64): series of 5 teeth, with minute nipple on very apex of tooth row (absent in some individuals). ‘U 1 ’ very wide, wedge-shaped, slightly wider but considerably shorter (40%, 40-50%) than ‘U2’; widely separated from ‘U2’ by 37% (35- 47%)cheliceral length, ‘U3’ much smaller than ‘U2’, ‘U3’-‘U5’ gradually decreasing in size proximally. Retromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 65): series of 7 teeth, ‘LI’ similar in shape and slightly largerthan‘Ur (124% height, 1 15-125%), much smaller (50% height, 50-67%) than ‘L2’. ‘LI’ well separated from ‘L2’, remainder of teeth closer together. Teeth gradually decreasing in size prox- imally. Cheliceral fang moderately long, approx- imately 84% length of base, tapering to smooth point at distal end. Cephalothorax 3.6 mm (3.5- 3.8), total length 9.5 mm (9.3-12.0). Chelicerae rather short, 64% (55-65%) length of cephalo- thorax. Legs lightly spotted, at least on femora, many of spots associated with spines (Figs. 67- 68). Spines small (21% length of cephalothorax), but conspicuous because of dark pigment at base. Femur I: 5 prolateral, 4 dorsal, 4 (3) retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 4 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 retrola- teral spines. Metatarsus I: 2 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 3 dorsal, 2 pro- lateral, no ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 dorsal, 1 prolateral spine. Cephalothoracic pattern very distinct: narrow, pale line running straight down midline, formed by separation of pair of wide, dark bands running down either side of midline as straight columns which constrict and converge towards midline, with small tendrils radiating laterally from fovea (Fig. 66). Lateral margins on posterior part of cephalothorax also dark. Ster- num dark coppery brown with dark margins. Ab- domen cigar-shaped, width and depth both ap- proximately 18% of total length (Fig. 69). Dorsum of abdomen with variable, straight-to-undulat- ing dark marks on tan-brown. Venter with rather broad black line running longitudinally down midline, bordered along length by paler stripes. Seminal receptacles: (Fig. 70). Two bulbs linked in opposing crescent shapes. Both bulbs well di- lated, upper bulb slightly larger than lower, lower projecting considerably farther out than upper. Median lobe takes form of doughnut projecting from stalk, situated in free space between widely separated bulbs. Color polymorphism.— This species is highly variable in the nature of the longitudinal lines running down the chestnut-brown abdomen. In some species, these are pale yellow, in other they are very dark black. Their width is also variable. Similarly, the extent of leg marking is variable, with more pigmented species having heavy black bars around the joints of their legs. The femoral spotting, however, is invariably present. Material Examined. — This species is common throughout Haleakala National Park and Waikamoi 14 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Preserve (Table 1). Maui Island: Haleakala. Hono- manu Gulch, 1876 m, 29-V-88, 22-VI-89 & 5-II-90 (R. G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); 1585 m, 6-II-90 (R. G. Gillespie). Waikamoi Gulch, 1310 m, 13-VII1-88 (R. G. Gillespie & C. Parrish). Opana Gulch, 1340 m, 8- VI-88 & 12-VII-88 (R. G. Gillespie & C. Parrish); 8- 11-90 (R. G. Gillespie & J. Burgett). Bogs, NE Rift Haleakala, 1676 m, 15-1-88, 16-1 88, 17-1-88 & 18-1- 88 (R. G. Gillespie & A. C. Medeiros); Kipahulu Val- ley, 1524 m, 14-V-90 (R. G. Gillespie & A. C. Med- eiros). Tetragnatha paludicola, new species (Figs. 71-84, 90, 91) Types. — Holotype male and allotype female from the bogs on the NE Rift of Haleakala, 1676 m, Maui Island (18 January 1988), collected by R. G. Gillespie and A. C. Medeiros, deposited in the Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Etymology. — Palus (Latin) bog; colo (Latin) to dwell in a place. The specific epithet is used in its adjectival form and refers to the very wet, boggy habitats to which this species is virtually confined. Diagnosis.— The most diagnostic feature of T. paludicola in the field is the smoothly oval, bottle green abdomen with red chevrons, and paired yellow marks on the venter. The color mostly fades in alcohol, but the cheliceral armature and shape of the palpal conductor are still distinctive. Description. — //o/o(.vpe male: (Figs. 71-77). Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 71): Distance be- tween ‘Gu’, ‘sP and ‘T’ approximately equal, ra- tio of distal end to ‘si’: ‘sP to ‘T’: ‘T’ to ‘rsuF 3: 3:3. ‘Gu’ pronounced, small, cone-shaped tu- bercle; ‘sP medium-sized cone directed out and slightly up from margin of chelicerae; same width as ‘T’, but much shorter, 37% height (35-48%). ‘T’ tall, narrow, rather straight spike, ‘rsu’ 5 (4- 5) spikes, ‘rsuF and ‘rsu2’ slightly divergent. Re- tromargin of chelicerae (Fig. 12): Total of 6 teeth. ‘AXP conspicuous cone-shaped notch; ‘GP strong and robust, wider but of similar height to ‘L5’ and ‘L6’, much stronger than ‘L2’-‘L4’. Dorsal spur long, shaped like slim, bent finger (13.7% length of cephalothorax); tip considerably longer on dorsal side (Fig. 73). Cheliceral fang shorter than base, bent sharply at both proximal and distal ends. Cephalothorax 2.6 mm (2. 2-2. 7), to- tal length 5.7 mm (5. 4-5. 8). Chelicerae shorter (75%) than cephalothorax. Depression of tho- racic fovea in form of paired semicircles (Fig. 74). Leg spination similar to female (Figs. 75- 76). Femur I: 5 prolateral, 4 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 3 prolateral, 2 dorsal, 3 retrola- teral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 3 dorsal, 2 pro- lateral, no ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 dorsal, 1 prolateral spine. Coloration and eye pattern sim- ilar to female. Conductor Tip: (Figs. 77, 90, 91). Symmetri- cal, high-peaked cap, terminating in smoothly tapered, downward-pointing projection. Allotype female: (Figs. 78-84). PME separated by just less than width of PME (Fig. 80). Median ocular area wider posteriorly. Lateral eyes con- tiguous. Promargin of chelicerae (Fig. 78): series of 6 teeth, ‘U 1 ’ very robust, considerably wider but shorter (64%) than ‘U2’; widely separated from ‘LJ2’ by 28% cheliceral length. ‘U2’-‘U7’ gradually decreasing in size proximally. Retro- margin of chelicerae (Fig. 79): series of 7 teeth, ‘LF slightly shorter than both ‘UF (92%) and ‘L2’ (86%). ‘LF distinctly separated from ‘L2’, teeth barely (if at all) decreasing in size proxi- mally. Cheliceral fang short, approximately 66% length of base, tapering to smooth point at distal end. Cephalothorax 3.3 mm, total length 8.6 mm. Chelicerae rather short, 65% length of cephalo- thorax. Legs well spotted, banded with reddish brown on yellow (Figs. 8 1 , 82). Spines short (23% length of cephalothorax). Femur I: 5 prolateral, 4 dorsal, 2 retrolateral spines. Tibia I: 3 prola- teral, 2 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Metatarsus I: 1 prolateral, 1 dorsal, 3 retrolateral spines. Femur III: 3 dorsal, 2 prolateral, no ventral spines. Tibia III: 1 dorsal, 1 prolateral spine. Cephalo- thorax pale brown, with distinct double fovea marked by darker lines along medial and anterior borders (Fig. 80). Sternum black with central translucent yellow area. Abdomen broad, deep, width and depth both approximately 46% of total length (Fig. 83). Dorsum of abdomen green/ brown (bright bottle-green in life), with distinct paired marks running down midline (in life, paired red chevron marks). Venter brown, 2 pairs of gold vertical bars on either side of midline. Seminal receptacles: (Fig. 84). Two bulbs linked in tight opposing, almost closed “comma” shapes, each well sclerotized on medial border. Upper bulb larger and more dilated than lower; central portion serves as a wide stalk between bulbs. Median lobe an ill-defined balloon projecting from stalk, virtually enclosed by bulbs. Color polymorphism.— This species exhibits continuous variation rather than polymorphism, and this is evident only in living specimens, in the form and extent of the paired red marks down the midline. GILLESPIE- HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 15 Figures 1\-M. — Tetragnatha paludicola\ Male holotype. 71) Promargin of right chelicera; 72) Retromargin of left chelicera; 73) Dorsal spur of right chelicera, lateral view; 74) carapace, dorsal view; 75) Right leg I, dorsal view; 76) Right leg III, prolateral view; 77) Left palpus, prolateral view. Female allotype. 78) Promargin of right chelicera; 79) Retromargin of left chelicera; 80) Carapace, dorsal view; 81) Right leg I, dorsal view; 82) Right leg III, prolateral view; 83) abdomen, dorsal view; 84) Seminal receptacles, ventral view. Scale lines in mm. Scale of Figs. 71-73, 78, 79 indicated beside 78; scale of 74, 80 indicated beside 80; scale of 75, 76, 81, 82 indicated beside 82. 16 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 85-91. — Scanning electron micrographs of conductor tips of male palps: 85) T. trituberculata\ 86) T. eurychasma: 87) T. filiciphilia\ 88-89) T. stelawbusta\ 90-91) T. paludicola. Scale: Figs. 85-88, 91 is 1000 x; Figs. 89, 90 is 200 x. Material Examined.— This species is found in very wet forest only (Table 1). Maui Island: Haleakala. Bogs on north east rift of Haleakala, 1676 m, 15-1-88, 16- 1-88, 17-1-88 & 18-1-88 (R. G. Gillespie & A. C. Med- eiros). Kipahulu Valley, 914 m, 16-V-90, 1524 m, 14- V-90 (R. G. Gillespie & A. C. Medeiros). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was supported by grants from the Hawaii Bishop Research Institute, the Hawaii Natural Area Reserves System and the Nature Conservancy of Hawaii. Additional support was provided by the Bishop Museum, the Nature Conservancy of Hawaii, Haleakala National Park and the Zoology Department, U. H. Manoa. I am deeply indebted to the following for their assistance in collecting specimens: Art Medeiros, Lloyd Loope, Mark White, Rob Rydell, David Preston, George Roderick, Jeff Burgett, Ron Na- gata, Chris Parrish and Paul Higashino. Lee Goff allowed me to use his compound microscope with camera lucida and Kenneth Kaneshiro allowed me to use his environmentally controlled facil- ities to maintain and rear live specimens. Thanks also to Marilyn Dunlap and Tina Carvalho for help with the SEM. Also to Henrietta Croom, Frank Howarth and Stephen Palumbi for advice GILLESPIE-HAWAIIAN TETRAGNATHA 17 and discussion, and to Jonathan Coddington and Norman Platnick for careful reviews of the first draft. LITERATURE CITED Dabrowska Prot, E. & J. Luczak. 1968a. Spiders and mosquitos of the ecotone alder forest {Carici elon- gatae-alnetum) and oak pine forest {Pino querce- tum). Ekologia Polska Seria A. XVI:46 1-483. Dabrowska Prot, E. & J. Luczak. 1968b. Studies on the incidence of mosquitos in the food of Tetrag- natha montana Simon and its food activity in the natural habitat. Ekologia Polska Seria A. XVI:843- 853. Dabrowska Prot, E., J. Luczak & K. Tarwid. 1968. Prey and predator density and their reactions in the process of mosquito reduction by spiders in field experiments. Ekologia Polska Seria A. XVI:773- 819. Gillespie, R. G. 1991. Hawaiian spiders of the genus Tetragnatha: 1. Spiny leg clade. J. ArachnoL, 19: 174-209. Karsch, F. 1880. Sitzungs-Berichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender freunde zu Berlin. Jahrgang. Sit- zung vom 18:76-84. Kaston, B.J. 1948. How to know the spiders. 3rd. ed. Wm. C. Brown Co., Dubuque, Iowa. Levi, H.W. 1981. The American orb-weaver genus Dolichognatha and Tetragnatha north of Mexico (Araneae: Araneidae, Tetragnathinae). Bull. Mus. Comp. ZooL, 149:271-318. Okuma, C. 1 987. A revision of the Australasian spe- cies of the genus Tetragnatha (Araneae, Tetrag- nathidae). Esakia, 25:37-96. Okuma, C. 1988. Redescriptions of the Hawaiian spiders of Tetragnatha described by Simon (Ara- neae, Tetragnathidae). J. Fac. Agr. Kyushu Univ., 33:77-86. Perkins, R. C. L. 1913. Introduction (to Fauna Ha- waiiensis). In Fauna Hawaiiensis. Vol. 1 :xv-ccxxviii. (D. Sharp, ed.). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. Simon, E. 1900. Arachnida: Fauna Hawaiiensis. Vol. 2:443-519, pis. 15-19. Suman, T.W. 1964. Spiders of the Hawaiian Islands: Catalog and Bibliography. Pacific Insects, 6:665- 687. Suman, T.W. 1970. Spiders of the family Thomisidae in Hawaii. Pacific Insects, 12(4):773-864. Wagner, W. L., D. R. Herbst and S. H. Sohmer. 1 990. Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawaii. Bishop Museum and Univ. of Hawaii Presses, Honolulu. Manuscript received April 1991, revised July 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:18-24 PHRYNIDAE (AMBLYPYGI) FROM ANDROS ISLAND, BAHAMAS, WITH NOTES ON DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS, RECENT ORIGIN AND ALLOMETRY D. Jonathan Browne: Dept, of Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, Republic of South Africa ABSTRACT: Fieldwork on Andros Island produced two species of phrynid amblypygi, Phrynus margine- maculatus and Pamphrynus viridiceps. New localities and biological data are presented. The species were found to be completely sympatric in two of the three localities where they were collected. The presence of amblypygi in the Bahamas is attributed to Recent dispersal from Cuba via Paleoprovidence, a land mass which emerged during the lower sea-levels accompanying Pleistocene glacials. Dispersal from Florida and Hispaniola is rejected. Significant isometric or allometric relationships between median prosomal length and pedipalp tibia length were not detected. The work generally points to the lack of much basic information on amblypygid distribution and bionomics. Two species of phrynid amblypygi are known from the Bahamas. Phrynus marginemaculatus C. L. Koch is widespread in the northern Bahama Islands (Quintero 1981) and Paraphrynus viri- diceps (Pocock) is known from southern Andros and New Providence Islands (Banks 1906; Mul- linex 1975). From published records, both ap- pear to be uncommon to rare in the Bahamas. Furthermore, these species have never been re- corded as being completely sympatric in the same habitat (see Quintero 1983). The general lack of collecting of all arthropods in the Bahama Islands, and especially Andros Island, was noted by the author several years ago while undertaking literature searches. This was surprising because Andros Island is the largest island in the Bahamas (Fig. 1), and has the great- est diversity of vegetation types which would presumably harbor the greatest number of ar- thropod species in the Bahamas. As a result of a familiarity based on many trips to Andros Island the author decided to undertake an extensive sur- vey of this island, employing modem mass col- lecting techniques not used by earlier workers. Recent collecting has revealed new localities and biological data for two Bahamian amblypygi spe- cies on Andros Island. This report is offered as a contribution to knowledge of the arthropods of the West Indies. METHODS The project was intended as a general survey of the arthropods of Andros Island, thus a wide variety of collecting techniques were employed. Collecting efforts from May through August 1987 (110 days) used flight intercept traps, malaise traps, baited pitfall traps, shrub and tree beating, grass sweeping, blacklighting and hand collecting [the most successful in terms of obtaining am- blypygi specimens]. The author was assisted by a technician throughout the collecting period. In- tensive hand collecting included investigating all caves and “banana holes” found, which often required the use of rappelling equipment to gain entrance. In addition stones, rocks, leaf litter and logs were turned and the spaces beneath the bark of dead trees examined to a height of 2 m. A large number of localities were sampled (> 100) which included all the recognised vege- tation zones many times over. Most recent plant ecology workers have characterized ten distinct Bahamian vegetation types; these are beach/ strand, coastal rock, coastal coppice, interior coppice, pineland, savanna, scrub, freshwater marsh, saltwater marsh, and mangrove (Nick- rent et al. 1987). All specimens recorded here were collected and identified by the author and vouchers were de- posited by Dr. S. B. Peck (Department of Biol- ogy, Carleton University, Ottawa) in the arach- nology collection of the American Museum of Natural History. The significance of allometric changes in am- blypygi has been previously studied and detailed by Quintero (1 983) for seven Cuban species. The significance of allometric changes in Bahamian 18 BROWNE- PHRYNIDAE FROM ANDROS ISLAND, BAHAMAS 19 Figure 1.— Map showing major islands of the Bahamas in relation to the Antilles and Florida. Line around islands represents probable extent of land area during Pleistocene glacial low sea levels. Paleoprovidence is the name proposed for the largest and most central of these Pleistocene glacial islands. Water barriers to dispersal were less significant during these times. Species may have been lost as sea levels rose, and the fauna was forced into today’s more restricted island areas. species has not been previously examined. Due to the small sample size, immatures, females and males were combined into a single data set (Table 1) as did Quintero (1983). The relationship be- tween median prosomal length (x) and pedipalp tibia length (y) was calculated using the Stat- graphics simple regression package (Version 2.6). Both linear and multiplicative models were fit to the data. The best-fit model was chosen based on R-squared values with the final relationship between x and y expressed as a power curve [y = <2x'’]. Comparison of actual and predicted slopes (Futuyma 1986), using the Student’s t test, followed techniques suggested by Sokal & Rohlf (1981) and Hoel (1984). Interpretation of results adhered to methods proposed by Futuyma (1986) and Packard & Boardman (1987). Statistical data are presented in Tables 2 and 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Both Phrynus marginemaculatus and Para- phrynus viridiceps were found to be resident on Andros Island. Despite intensive and prolonged searching, populations were located in only three small (each roughly 0.5 km^) and isolated local- ities of high interior coppice. No specimens of either species were found in any of the other nine recognized vegetation zones. Only a few speci- mens of each species were collected so as not to disrupt what appeared to be uncommon and iso- lated populations. However, they were found to be very abundant throughout the period from May to August 1987. The two species bear the following information. Phrynus marginemaculatus Distribution.— This species has the most up- permost latitudinal distributional range of any amblypygid species in the eastern part of North America. It has been previously recorded from Bermuda, southern Florida, Cuba, Haiti, Do- minican Republic, Puerto Rico, Jamaica, and Antigua (Quintero 1983) and is widespread in the northern Bahama Islands (Quintero 1981). New Records.— BAHAMAS: Andros Island (random search of high interior coppices); CDC Farm, Cricket Coppice, 19 July 1987, 1 female; Shot-gun Coppice, 20 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1.— Measurements of Median Prosomal Length (x) and Pedipalp Tibia Length 0')i in mm, from spec- imens collected from Andros Island during July 1987. A = Phrynus marginemaculatus, B = Paraphrynus vir- idiceps. Specimen . number A B V y .V y 1 3.984 3.992 5.140 4.998 2 5.280 5.450 7.085 8.100 3 4.290 4.423 6.140 6.140 4 5.040 4.783 4.235 4.000 5 2.950 2.790 3.589 3.400 6 4.558 4.940 3.790 3.280 7 — — 3.060 2.890 8 - - 5.685 5.465 19 July 1987, 2 females (1 with 12 eggs), 4 males; London Ridge, 24 July 1987, 1 male. Variation. — Body length 6.32-13.98 mm; median prosomal length 2.95-5.28 mm; left pedipalp tibia length 2.79-5.45 mm. Color varies from wheat yellow to black in both males and females. Paraphrynus viridiceps Distribution.— This species is limited to the Bahamas and Cuba (Quintero 1983). Paraphry- nus viridiceps has been previously recorded from Cuba (Quintero 1983). The holotype male was collected in New Providence and described by Pocock (1893). Additional Bahamas records in- clude Andros Island (South Bight) and New Providence (Mullinex 1975). New Records.— BAHAMAS: Andros Island (ran- dom search of high interior coppices): CDC Farm, Cricket Coppice, 19 July 1987, 1 male; London Ridge, 24 July 1987, 4 females, 2 males, 1 immature. Variation. — Body length 6.29-15.04 mm; median prosomal length 3.06-7.08 mm; left pedipalp tibia length 2.89-8. 10 mm. Color varies from wheat yellow to black in both males and females. Local Distribution and Habitat Preferences: High interior coppices occur on elevated parts of Andros Island. This community is the most diverse of the vegetation zones on the island. Dominant woody plant species in this vegetation zone include Bursera simaruba, Metopium tox- iferum. Ficus aurea, Exothea paniculata, Calyp- tranthes patlens, Drypetes diversifolia, Clusea ro- sea, Psychotria angustifolia and Nectandra coriacea (Nickrent et al. 1987). The surface of the high coppice is very much eroded and slightly depressed which tends to accumulate moisture. They are protected from annual burning of the surrounding pine forests and savanna (the two most common vegetation zones). The canopy of a coppice is dense with a cool and wet, but sparse, understory layer. The vegetation grows on hon- ey-combed limestone which affords the ambly- pygids many small holes in which to retreat. Am- blypygi appear to favor cool, wet habitats (Quintero 1983) which explains their preference for the high interior coppice. The coppices are separated by wide stretches of arid savanna and pine forest. Two of the three coppices in which these species were found (London Ridge and Shot- gun Coppice) lie approximately 60 km from each other. The third coppice (Cricket Coppice) is within four km of Shot-gun Coppice. Pocock (1893) recorded Paraphrynus viridiceps from southern Andros Island, which is over 100 km from the populations recorded here, and per- manently separated by a wide salt-water gap from the central and northern sections of the island. Although amblypygids are known to run rapidly, their dispersal capabilities are unknown. No specimens were found in the dry savanna or pine forest. If non-habitable areas lie between cop- pices, then four km may be as much a barrier to gene flow as 60 km. At present it is not known if amblypygids disperse between coppices in the Bahamas. However, widespread habitat destruc- tion has occurred several times on Andros Island as a result of logging; therefore, the present ap- parent isolation of these populations may be a recent condition. Sympatry: Partial sympatry of species ranges between Phrynus and Paraphrynus has been re- ported previously (Quintero 1983). However, Quintero (1983) “doubts” that “species ranges will overlap to a major extent” due to “compet- itive exclusion”. On Andros Island Paraphrynus viridiceps and Phrynus marginemaculatus were found to be completely sympatric in the same habitat. They were also observed to intermingle freely. However, these observations do not dis- prove the occurrence of competitive exclusion. The absence of specific information relating to specific niche requirements for either species makes it difficult to support or refute competitive exclusion. Recent origin of Bahamian amblypy- gids: Three possible sources of Bahamian am- blypygi must be considered. These are Florida, Cuba and Hispaniola. Dispersal of flora and fau- na from Florida into the Caribbean is considered to be a very rare event. Many insect groups (Eick- BROWNE-PHRYNIDAE FROM ANDROS ISLAND, BAHAMAS 21 Table 2.— Statistics for regressions of Median Prosomal Length (x) versus Pedipalp Tibia Length (v), comparing linear (L) and multiplicative (M) models. Data from specimens collected from Andros Island during July 1987. A = Phrynus marginemaculatus, B = Paraphrynus viridiceps, a = intercept, b = slope. Sp. Model a ± SE b ± SE SE estimate A L -0.295 ± 0.59 1.08 ± 0.13 94.18 0.250 A M -0.153 ± 0.16 1.11 ± 0.11 95.92 0.053 B L -1.208 ± 0.45 1.23 ± 0.01 96.89 0.335 B M -0.338 ± 0.11 1.20 ± 0.07 97.81 0.057 wort 1988“Halictidae; Liebherr l98S—Platyn- us; Nichols 1988~Scaratinae; Ramos 1988 — Homoptera; Slater 1988 — Lygaeidae; Wilson 1988 — Formicidae; Peck 1989 — south Florida insects) and trees (Tomlinson 1980) are believed to have dispersed from the Caribbean north, via Cuba or the Bahamas, to south Florida (Patter- son & Stevenson 1977). The strong northern movement, from the southern Caribbean, of storms, prevailing winds and the Gulf Stream supports this argument. The author agrees with this assessment and with the implication that southern movement of flora and fauna from Florida to the Bahamas can be considered a very rare event. Immigration and certain residency could have only been possible since the re-emergence of the Bahamas after Pliocene flooding. The northern Bahamas (including Andros Island) are part of the Bahama Bank, considered to be exposed con- tinental shelf (Lee 1951; Burke et al. 1984; Don- nelly 1988). During the lower (some 100 m) sea- levels accompanying Pleistocene glacials and as recently as 18,000 years BP, the northern Ba- hamas were broadly and continuously adjacent to Cuba via a land mass known as Paleoprov- idence, with the latter separated from the former by only a few kilometres of open water (Fig. 1). Immigration from Cuba during this time is the most likely route, rather than the “stepping- stone” route from Hispaniola via the southern Bahamas. This hypothesis is reflected in the cur- rent distribution of Bahamian trees. Sixty-three species are common to the Bahamas and Cuba, while only twenty-nine are common to the Ba- hamas, Cuba, Hispaniola and the Lesser Antilles (Patterson & Stevenson 1977). Therefore the widespread presence of Phrynus marginemacu- latus throughout the northern Bahama Islands and the more restricted distribution of Para- phrynus viridiceps to only a few of these islands is a reflection of a once widespread distribution of these species throughout Paleoprovidence. Rising sea-levels and inundation of most of Pa- leoprovidence have formed the present Bahama Islands in the last few thousand years. This re- duction in area would also have reduced species numbers to present levels and restricted their movement between the newly isolated islands. Allometry: Both the linear and multiplicative models had significant fits to the data for both species (Table 2). However, the R-squared values were higher for the multiplicative model, indi- cating that a power curve is the best-fit line. Allometries between closely related species are not congruent; but significantly different inter- specific differences between wild and laboratory reared specimens have been reported, although Quintero (1983) ascribes these differences to methodology. Quintero (1983) reported isomet- ric growth for seven Cuban species of amblypygi. It is more probable that he proved allometric growth for reasons which are detailed below. Demonstration of an allometric or an isomet- ric relationship depends on the value of both the intercept and slope of the best-fit line. Packard & Boardman (1987), in their comprehensive re- view of allometric analysis, state: “When a plot of some variable of interest yields a straight line passing through the origin of a graph with linear co-ordinates, the variable varies isometrically with body size. When the line is curvilinear or when it does not pass through the origin, how- ever, the variable varies allometrically with body size”. Since neither line passes through the ori- gin, the Bahamian amblypygi species in this study do not exhibit isometric growth (Table 2; Fig. 2). It is also evident that Quintero (1983) demon- strated allometric growth, rather than isometric growth, as none of the best-fit lines which he presented passed through the origin. This is not an unexpected finding since size-related varia- tion in most physiological variables is allometric (Packard & Boardman 1987). 22 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY P E D I P A L P T I B I A L E N G T H MEDIAN PROSOMAL LENGTH P E D I P A L P T I B I A L E N G T H MEDIAN PROSOMAL LENGTH Figure 2.— Allometric growth curves with linear co-ordinates; Median Prosomal Length (abscissa) versus Pedipalp Tibia Length (ordinate), measurements in mm. Slopes of both graphs are not significantly different from one and therefore an allometric relationship is not demonstrated. A = Phrynus marginemaculatus, B = Paraphrynus viridiceps. BROWNE-PHRYNIDAE FROM ANDROS ISLAND, BAHAMAS 23 Table 3.— Statistics for Student’s t test to determine whether the slope of the multiplicative regression differs significantly from one for each of the Andros Island amblypygi species, lib = 1, then an allometric relationship is not demonstrated (Futuyma 1986). This is the case for both species. Species t N-2 P Phrynus marginemaculatus 0.246 4 0.3 > P > 0.4 Paraphrynus viridiceps 0.529 6 0.3 > P> 0.4 While the data in this study did not exhibit an isometric relationship, it cannot be concluded that an allometric one is demonstrated by de- fault. An allometric relationship also depends on the value of the slope {b) (Futuyma 1986). Al- lometry is demonstrated only if 1 \.\ib = 1, then y is a constant proportion of x and al- lometry is not demonstrated. This is the case with both species of Bahamian amblypygi from Andros Island (Table 3); therefore, allometry is not demonstrated. This is in contradiction to Quintero (1983) who reported an allometric re- lationship for the same variables in seven species of Cuban amblypygi. Quintero (1983) did not detail his methodology so no reason for this dis- crepancy can be determined at this time, save for disproportionate sample sizes. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to thank the people of An- dros Island, without whose co-operation this project would never have been realised. Thanks are especially due to Mr. D. Myles who ably assisted under difficult field conditions. Dr. G. Dennill (Dept, of Entomology, University of Pre- toria) and Dr. S. B. Peck (Dept, of Biology, Carle- ton University) provided invaluable editorial as- sistance. Dr. S. Chown and Mr. M. Vogt (Dept, of Entomology, University of Pretoria) kindly assisted with the statistical analysis. To Mr. J. C. Cokendolpher, Dr. G. L. Miller, Dr. D. Quin- tero and an anonymous reviewer I wish to extend my sincere thanks for suggesting many improve- ments to this manuscript. I also wish to thank Panagiotis Karandis, the mad Greek, for stim- ulating conversation and procuring a seemingly endless supply of mental lubricants. To my Zhitt & Jive II companions, Lou “Captain Ahab” De Vries, Mark “Robo-scrop” Vogt and Jon “Hard- copy” Pio, my sincere thanks for their useful, albeit few, twisted and rather bizarre, ideas. Prof. C. H. Scholtz (Dept, of Entomology, University of Pretoria), my PhD supervisor, kindly allowed me to delve into arachnids when he probably would have preferred me to keep looking at scar- abaeoid wings. My tolerant parents, Ron and Mary Browne, have kindly given me much en- couragement and financial support while com- pleting this project and over many years. Finally I would like to thank Prebendary Philip Hus- bands and Albert Ernest Browne who provided most of the funding for the field work. LITERATURE CITED Banks, N. 1906. Arachnida from the Bahamas. Bull. American Mus. Nat. Hist., 22:185-189. Burke, K., C. Cooper, J. F. Dewey, P. Mann, & J. L. Pindell. 1984. Caribbean tectonic and relative plate motions. Pp. 31-63. In The Caribbean— South American Plate Boundary and Regional Tectonics (W.E. Bonini, R. B. Hargraves, & R. Shagam, eds.). Geol. Soc. America Mem., 162. Donnelly, T. W. 1988. Geological constraints on Ca- ribbean biogeography. Pp. 15-37. In Zoogeography of Caribbean Insects. (J. K. Liebheer, ed.). Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. Eickwort, G. C. 1988. Distribution patterns and bi- ology of West Indian sweat bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Pp. 231-254. In Zoogeography of Ca- ribbean Insects. (J. K. Liebheer, ed.). Cornell Uni- versity Press, Ithaca, New York. Futuyma, D. J. 1986. Evolutionary Biology, 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachu- setts. 600 pp. Hoel, P. G. 1984. Introduction to Mathematical Sta- tistics. 5th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto. 435 PP- Lee, C. S. 1951. Geophysical surveys on the Bahama Banks. J. Inst. Petrol., 37:633-657. Liebherr, J. K. 1988. Biogeographic patterns of West Indian Platynus carabid beetles (Coleoptera). Pp. 121-153. In Zoogeography of Caribbean Insects, (J. K. Liebherr, ed.). Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. Mullinex, C. L. 1975. Revision of Paraphrynus Mo- reno (Amblypygida: Phrynidae) for North America and the Antilles. Occ. Papers Calififomia Acad. Sci., 116:1-80. Nichols, S. W. 1988. Kaleidoscopic biogeography of West Indian Scaratinae (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Pp. 71-121. In Zoogeography of Caribbean Insects. (J. K. Liebherr, ed.). Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. 24 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Nickrent, D. L., W. H. Eshbaugh & T. K. Wilson. 1987. The vascular flora of Andros Island. Uni- versity of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois. 182 pp. Packard, G. C. & T. J. Boardman. 1987. The misuse of ratios to scale physiological data allometrically with body size. Pp. 2 1 6-240. In New Directions in Ecological Physiology. (M. E. Feder, A. F. Bennett, W. W. Burggren & R. B. Huey, eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Patterson, J. & G. Stevenson. 1977. Native trees of the Bahamas. Bahamas National Trust, Nassau. 128 pp. Peck, S. B. 1989. A survey of insects in the Florida Keys: Post-Pleistocene land-bridge islands: Intro- duction. Florida Ent., 72:603-612. Pocock, R. I. 1893. Contributions to our knowledge of the arthropod fauna of the West Indies. III. Di- plopoda and Malacopoda, with a supplement on the Arachnida of the class Pedipalpi. J. Linn. Soc. Zook, 24:473-544. Quintero, D., Jr. 1981. The amblypygid genus P/trv- nus in the Americas (Amblypygi, Phrynidae). J. Ar- achnol., 9:1 17-166. Quintero, D., Jr. 1983. Revision of the amblypygid spiders of Cuba and their relationships with the Ca- ribbean and continental American amblypygid fau- na. Studies on the Fauna of Curasao and other Ca- ribbean Islands, 196:1-54. Ramos, J. A. 1988. Zoogeography of the Auchen- orrhynchous Homoptera of the Greater Antilles (Hemiptera). Pp. 61-11. In Zoogeography of Carib- bean Insects. (J. K. Liebherr, ed.). Cornell Univer- sity Press, Ithaca, New York. Slater, J. A. 1988. Zoogeography of West Indian Ly- gaeidae (Hemiptera). Pp. 38-61. In Zoogeography of Caribbean Insects. (J. K. Liebherr, ed.). Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf 1981. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco. 859 pp. Tomlinson, P. B. 1980. The Biology of Trees Native to Tropical Florida. Harvard University Printing Office, Allston, Massachusetts. 480 pp. Wilson, E. O. 1988. The biogeography of the West Indian ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Pp. 214- 23 1 . In Zoogeography of Caribbean Insects. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. Manuscript received April 1991, revised August 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:25-34 WEB CONSTRUCTION BY MODISIMUS SP. (ARANEAE, PHOLCIDAE) William G. Eberhard: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and Escuela de Biologia, Universidad de Costa Rica, Ciudad Universitaria, Costa Rica ABSTRACT. The behavior used by Modisimus sp. to construct its domed sheet web is more stereotyped and organized than is apparent from the finished structure. A simple program involving attaching the non-sticky dragline to the substrate beyond the previous limits of the web, and then filling in the newly formed angle is probably used to construct the skeleton sheet and the tangle above it. A set of sticky lines is then laid, filling in this sheet. Construction behavior resembles that of orb weavers in commencing with a skeleton scaffold of non- sticky lines which is then filled in with other non-sticky lines, in adding sticky lines after the support structure of non-sticky lines is complete, and in being organized around a central area. It is commonly stated in general texts that pholcid spiders make non-adhesive tangle webs with little or no organization (e.g., Levi, Levi & Zim 1968; Forster & Forster 1973; Foelix 1982; Shinkai 1984; Shear 1986). Most accounts are apparently based primarily on the webs of the temperate species Pholcus phalangiodes (Fues- slin). With the slow accumulation of data on tropical pholcids, it is becoming clear that there is a rich diversity of web forms in this family (Eberhard & Briceno 1985; Deeleman-Reinhold 1986; Eberhard in press a on Physocyclus glo- bosus Taczanowski), and that some pholcid webs include sticky lines (Briceno 1985), and entan- gling “screw threads” (Kirchner 1986). Other than the mention of two stages of web construction in two Modisimus spp. (Eberhard & Briceno 1985), there are, to my knowledge, no descriptions of how pholcid webs are built (or, for that matter, of the construction of almost any other non-orb web; Eberhard 1 990a). Given the relatively isolated taxonomic position of Phol- cidae (e.g., Lehtinen 1 967; Shear 1 986), the means by which they produce aerial sheet webs with sticky lines are likely to prove of interest in com- parison with construction of webs in other fam- ilies. This paper describes the construction of such webs by a third Modisimus species. METHODS Spiders were observed during daylight hours on 22-25 February, 1991 on fallen trees and but- tresses in an overgrown cocoa orchard at La Sel- va Biological Station, near Puerto Viejo, Heredia Province, Costa Rica (el. about 50 m). At least part of the construction of 2 1 different webs was observed. Web construction was elicited by par- tially or nearly completely destroying the web on which the spider was found. Some webs were coated with cornstarch before being destroyed. I included observations of spiders that started to build replacement webs 5-45 min after their webs were destroyed. Several partially completed webs were coated with cornstarch. By recoating these webs lightly when they were finished, it was possible to dis- tinguish the order in which lines had been laid (more heavily coated lines first, others later). The stages of construction behavior in partial and complete web replacement were similar, and the two are combined in the descriptions below. Samples of adult webs, collected by wetting the edges of a microscope slide and then lifting it through the web, were viewed at 400 x with direct illumination. Spiders were identified by C. Deeleman-Rein- hold. The species, which seems close to M. pul- chellus Banks 1929, is apparently undescribed. Voucher specimens are deposited in the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MA 02138 (Nos. 3604, 3606, 3611), and in the collection of C. Deeleman-Reinhold (Sparrenlaan 8, Os- sendrecht. The Netherlands). This species is dif- ferent from the Modisimus species whose be- havior was described previously (Eberhard & Briceno 1983, 1985). RESULTS Finished webs. —Webs of Modisimus sp. were found attached to large supporting objects such as the buttresses of trees or fallen logs (Fig. 1). Web sites were usually sheltered from at least 25 26 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 1.— Webs of Modisimus sp. on the heavily populated base of a tree trunk with deep indentations. Note the variability in web design. Scale bar is 1 5 cm. moderate rains. Webs typically included a more or less dome-shaped sheet of relatively open mesh, with a sparse tangle of lines above which was more dense in the area above the top of the dome (Figs. 2, 3). The height of the tangle was generally between 0. 5-1.0 times the maximum diameter of the sheet. The spider rested on the underside of the sheet at the peak of the dome. The dome was usually asymmetrical, with the peak near a large object (e.g., the trunk of a tree). The sheet on the side away from this object (the “exposed” side) was usually larger. The dome was oriented more or less horizon- tally, so the peak was the uppermost part of the sheet (Figs. 1, 2). The exposed side was usually below the top of the dome, and its edge was often close to horizontal (Fig. 2). Orientations and shapes varied, however, with websites. For in- stance, some sheets were nearly planar (Fig. 4), while in other webs, built in small indentations in tree trunks, the exposed side of the sheet was nearly vertical (Fig. 5). The lines in the sheet were not arranged in geometrically regular arrays, but they showed consistent patterns. Near the border of the ex- posed side, a few lines in the sheet were relatively straight (Figs. 2, 3); judging by the amount they sagged when coated with cornstarch, these lines were under more tension and/or were less exten- sible than the others. The lines forming the edges of the sheet were of this type. Other lines in the sheet which intersected the edges often had a “V” shape (Fig. 3). By powdering webs twice (see Methods), it was determined that the long, straight lines in the sheet were built during skeleton web construction, while the others were laid during sheet fill-in behavior (Fig. 6; see below). A further pattern, more marked in some webs than in oth- ers, was that the lines in the sheet near the ex- posed edge formed a more open mesh than those in the sheet near the peak of the dome (Figs. 2, 3, 5). The size and shape of the web, as well as the density of lines in the sheet varied substantially between webs of the same individual. Replace- ment webs seemed to be smaller, with less dense- ly meshed sheets (cf Figs. 2 and 6), but no precise measurements were made. Samples of three finished webs collected on microscope slides had lines of at least three dif- ferent diameters. Many of the finest lines bore rows of small spheres. Near the exposed edge of the sheet these lines tended to run approximately perpendicular to the border of the web, which was formed by a relatively thick line. When a drop of water was placed on one sample, then allowed to evaporate, the spheres were reduced to small “ghosts”, indicating that a major frac- tion of each sphere was water soluble. The junc- tions of thicker lines generally had masses of material that were probably attachment discs. In contrast, points where fine lines vwth balls crossed other lines generally lacked such masses. Construction behavior. — I distinguished three types of construction behavior: extending the skeleton web; filling in the skeleton web; and filling in the sheet. Construction always began with extension of the skeleton web, which was followed by alternating bouts of filling in the skel- eton and further extension. A bout of filling in the skeleton was usually followed vwthout a pause by filling in the sheet. This stage was less fre- quently interrupted by other activities, though occasionally a few attachments (probably filling in the skeleton) were made to the substrate and/ or to web lines near a sheltered edge of the web. Sometimes the spider temporarily ceased filling in the sheet and rested at the top of the dome, only to resume this behavior 1-10 min later. 1. Extension of the skeleton web: The area en- compassed by the web lines was gradually ex- tended by additions along an edge. The spider EBERHARD-WEB CONSTRUCTION BY MODISIMUS SP. 27 Figures 2-3.— A finished web of a mature female Modisimus sp. seen laterally (Fig. 2), and a closeup of the sheet on the exposed side of the web seen from above (Fig. 3). Heavy arrows mark relatively straight lines in the sheet, while others in Fig. 3 mark “V” junctions at the exposed edge of the web. Note also the remains of a previous sheet just below the new one (arrow), and the approximately horizontal edge of the exposed side (nearest the viewer) in Fig. 2. Scale bars are 3 cm (Fig. 2) and 2 cm (Fig. 3). extended the web by first attaching its drag line one or more times to one or more lines already present, then walking to the end of the line on the web’s edge and then along the substrate away from this web line (Fig. 7A). It usually moved more or less horizontally on the substrate. The spider attached its dragline to the substrate by bending its abdomen ventrally to touch the spin- 28 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY .Wapii EBERHARD-WEB CONSTRUCTION BY MODISIMUS SP. 29 Figure 6.— Lateral view of the web built to replace the web in Figs. 2 and 3 (note collapsed web against the tree trunk at right). The more heavily powdered lines of the replacement web formed the skeleton web that was built before the spider began to fill in the sheet. The lines laid as the sheet was filled in are more lightly powdered. Note the relatively long, straight lines of the skeleton web that are incorporated in the nearer, “exposed” portion of the sheet. Scale bar is 1 cm. nerets to the substrate, holding the dragline with one extended leg IV as it did so (Fig. 7 A). Then it returned along this newly laid line, attaching its dragline one or more times to it or to other web lines as it went (Fig. 7B). Often, especially soon after building began, the spider immedi- ately went to the other side of the same edge of the web and extended it also in a similar manner (Fig. 7B). Occasionally the trip to the opposite side was abbreviated when the spider turned back before reaching the substrate and returned along the first side to extend it further. Up to six suc- cessive extensions on alternate sides of the same edge of the web were seen. A series of extensions usually ended when the spider attached its drag- line part way across the border of the web, and turned to walk inward toward the area where the top of the dome would be located (Fig. 7C). Early stages of extension of the skeleton web included lines laid above the plane where the sheet would eventually be in the finished web. In contrast, later extensions were always close to the plane of the sheet. Most extension occurred on the exposed edge of the web (e.g., side op- posite the sheltering tree trunk). During web ex- tension the spider seemed to walk more slowly than during later stages. 2. Filling in the skeleton web: After one or more web extensions, the spider moved around in the space encompassed by the web lines, attaching Figures 4-5.— Webs of Modisimus sp., illustrating variations on the basic domed form. The sheet of the web of a mature individual (Fig. 4) was nearly horizontal, rather than being domed. The sheet of the web of an immature individual was built in a small indentation in a tree trunk, and included a large, nearly vertical extension of the exposed edge (Fig. 5). Scale bars are 8 cm (Fig. 4) and 3 cm (Fig. 5). 30 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY its dragline to many of the lines it crossed. Each attachment was made by moving the abdomen ventrally toward the web line to which the drag- line would be attached. At least one leg III grasped this line just anterior to the spinnerets. On some occasions the contralateral leg III also grasped the web line, also apparently just anterior to the attachment site. More rarely the IV leg ipsilateral to the III on the line also held the web line, in this case just posterior to the attachment site. In one case, a leg II also held the line just anterior to the leg III. I was unable to determine if any legs consistently held the dragline just before or during attachment. In some webs, but not others, the spider dropped down from the web at least once for 1-5 cm on a dragline, then ascended on the same line without having made an attach- ment. Most filling in of the skeleton web was per- formed in the central area of the web, especially where the top of the dome of the finished sheet would be. Filling in of the skeleton web differed from web extension in that spiders were never seen to turn back after an attachment and walk along the line that had just been laid, even when this involved attachments to the substrate. In some cases, the spider did not fill in on the ex- posed side of the web in the area encompassed by the last several web extensions. As during web extension, the spider consis- tently moved beneath lines already laid while filling in the skeleton, very seldom climbing up past a line to make an attachment (two excep- tions were seen). As a result, the lines laid while filling in the skeleton tended to form bridges un- der the more upward projecting portions of the web which had been laid earlier (Fig. 8). Usually successive lines soon came to be concentrated in the plane where the sheet would be, but in some cases the lines did not form a plane at first, and the spider moved gradually lower, making a taller tangle of lines before finally forming a plane which would be the sheet. When I had only partially destroyed the previous web, the earliest skeleton web attachments were made to the very edge of the broken sheet, while later attachments were approximately 1 mm from the edge on the intact sheet. This resulted in the plane of the new sheet being slightly below the broken edge of the old sheet. The combined processes of extension of the skeleton web and filling in the skeleton lasted 3- 10 min. In the “completed” skeleton web (all the lines present when the spider began to fill in the sheet), the smallest mesh was where the top of the dome would be, often forming a small, nearly horizontal platform of relatively uniform mesh that was approximately the size of the spider as it rested on the web (Fig. 6). This area had a tangle of lines above it, and was surrounded by a more or less planar extension that was pro- gressively less densely meshed farther away from this central area. 3. Filling in the sheet: The process of filling in the sheet usually took approximately 5-10 min. The spider walked in approximately straight lines beneath the skeleton sheet, repeatedly drawing silk from its spinnerets with its legs IV. The hind legs pulled the line (or lines?) and then pressed it upward against the sheet, where it stuck. The legs IV usually moved nearly synchronously up- ward, with one lagging slightly behind the other (Fig. 9). Occasionally they moved with alternate upward strokes, as described for similar behavior in other Modisimus spp. (Eberhard & Briceno 1985). Lines laid as the sheet was filled in were oc- casionally attached by touching the spinnerets to web lines as described above. Such attachments were made almost exclusively to lines near the edge of the web, and were immediately followed by the spider abruptly moving toward the central area, thus producing a “V” configuration of the sheet fill in lines (e.g.. Fig. 3). No attachments were made to most other web lines encountered as the sheet was filled in. In one case, with fa- Figure 7 A-C.— Schematic representation of two successive typical web extensions, seen from above. Lines present before the web extension began are dotted, and attachments made during each figure are dots. Numbers indicate the sequence of dragline attachments. A. The spider attached its dragline to a line at the edge of the web (1), walked to the substrate along a line, and then walked away from this line before attaching its dragline to the substrate (2). B. The spider returned along this newly laid line to the edge of the web and attached there (3), then walked farther along this edge to the substrate on the other side and attached there beyond the previous edge of the web (4). C. The spider returned along this newly laid line, attached its dragline part way across the new edge of the web (5), and moved toward the interior of the web. EBERHARD-WEB CONSTRUCTION BY MODISIMUS SP. 31 32 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 8. — Lateral schematic representation of how the lower portion of the skeleton web was lowered and smoothed as the spider attached lines exclusively on the underside of the web as the skeleton web was filled in. Lines laid early are dotted, those laid later are solid. vorable lighting in which the skeleton web lines had been powdered, I noted that lines laid as the sheet was filled in were not tense, and moved slightly in very weak air currents. I collected samples of two webs on microscope slides just after the spider began to fill in the sheet, and found that the fine lines with balls on them that were common in finished webs were nearly completely absent. Thus these presum- ably sticky lines were added to the skeleton web when the sheet was filled in. DISCUSSION There seems to be a simple organizing “prin- ciple” at work during web construction by Mod- isimus, in both the horizontal (Fig. 7) and the vertical (Fig. 8) dimensions. The spider first ex- tends the sides of the angle formed by the limits of the web (e.g.. Fig. 7A), then fills in the space between the new sides with further lines (e.g., Fig. 7B, C). In the horizontal dimension this pro- cess occurs repeatedly, and involves new attach- Figure 9. — Diagrammatic representation of move- ments made as the spider filled in the sheet. The spider moved across the underside of the skeleton web (hor- izontal arrow), pulling a line or lines from its spinnerets with its hind legs and pushing upward (vertical arrows) against the web. All legs other than one leg I and the two legs IV are omitted for clarity. ments to the substrate. This enables the spider to extend the web in accord with the open space available. The spiders’ long legs permit them to span relatively large spaces, and thus move easily across irregularities in the substrate. In order to perform horizontal web extensions effectively, the spider must take into account which side of the web already has lines present when it turns after reaching the previous attach- ment to the substrate (e.g., turn to its left in Fig. 7A). This is necessary if the spider is to extend the web by laying its new line on the side of the previous attachment which lacks lines, rather than add another line to the area already covered. Spiders seemed to make such distinctions quite consistently, as I never saw a spider walk to the leading edge of a web, then walk in the wrong direction along the substrate and attach a line and return to the web along it. Possibly this dis- crimination was accomplished by having some legs holding web lines other than the line along which the spider moved out toward the periph- ery. Memory of distances and directions trav- elled (an apparently ancient and widespread ca- pability in arachnids; see Eberhard 1988) may also be involved. In order for the lines and attachments which are laid after a web extension attachment to the substrate to extend the web, the spider must re- turn along the line it has just attached to the substrate, rather than along previously laid lines. This may explain why spiders consistently held the dragline with one leg IV as the attachment to the substrate was made (Fig. 7). In contrast with many orb weavers (e.g., Eberhard 1982), Modisimus sp. frequently failed to hold the drag- line in other situations. The web construction behavior of Modisimus. sp. and that of two other Modisimus species EBERHARD-WEB CONSTRUCTION BY MODISIMUS SP. 33 (Eberhard & Briceno 1985), which also build domed sheets with small tangles above, are prob- ably very similar. All three species began con- struction by laying a scaffold of thicker lines without sticky balls on them. The first two stages of construction behavior described here (exten- sion and skeleton fill in) apparently correspond to the “Phase I” of the other two Modisimus spp. (Eberhard & Briceno 1985). These species also have long, straight lines near the edge of the sheet. The later stages of construction by all three spe- cies consists of filling in the plane of the sheet, using legs IV to pull out lines and then push them against the sheet. Lines laid at this stage carry sticky balls (Briceno 1985) in at least two of the species. In all three species, attachments of both lines in the skeleton web and of sheet fill in lines to the edges of the skeleton web are consistently made while one leg III holds the line to which the attachment is being made just anterior to the attachment site. Similar use of one leg III during attachment of the dragline also occurs in the pholcid Physocyclus globosus (Eberhard, un- publ.). The establishment of a sparse network of lines followed by the addition of interconnecting lines in Modisimus sp. also resembles the construction process described for some theridiid spiders (La- moral 1968). The pholcid differs, however, in establishing the first lines in non-radial rather than radial directions (e.g. compare Fig. 7 with fig. 7 of Lamoral 1968), and also in having a much tighter mesh away from the edge of the skeleton web. Pholcids are thought to be only very distantly related to orb weavers (Lehtinen 1967; Shear 1986). A comparison of the organization of the webs and web building behavior of Modisimus. sp. with that of orb weavers suggests three basic similarities. First, in both web types a scaffolding of non-sticky lines is built first, and used to sus- tain sticky lines laid later. Second, in both web types the outlines of the scaffold are built first, and then gradually filled in, first with other non- sticky lines (although in the pholcid these two stages were more often mixed together), and then with sticky lines. Finally, construction of both web types is clearly organized around a central area (the hub of an orb, the peak of the dome of the pholcid web). These presumably independently derived sim- ilarities support the view that some orb-associ- ated traits, such as construction behavior that is organized in a plane around a central area, and construction of a non-sticky scaffold which is then filled in with sticky lines, are not limited to orb weavers (Eberhard 1 990a). However, in the pholcid web the lines do not radiate from a cen- tral area, as do the radii of an orb, and neither sticky nor non-sticky lines are organized in cir- cular or spiral patterns. Thus the behavioral sim- ilarities are not reflected in the geometric pat- terns of lines in the finished webs. Another difference is that the pholcids did not break lines and reconnect them during web con- struction. The early “exploration” stage typical of orb web construction seemed to be absent, except for occasional descents without attach- ments, which resembled similar descents of some orb weavers (Eberhard 1990b). All other lines laid from the start of construction were included in the finished pholcid web. Probably this lack of line replacement behavior is a primitive trait. The absence of line removal was not due to the pholcid being unable to cut lines, as on several occasions during skeleton web construction a spi- der neatly cut out a piece of debris and dropped it free. In no case, however, did a spider break a line, then attach its dragline to one broken end and reel up the other as it walked on, as occurs in many orb weavers (Eberhard 1982, 1990b; Coddington 1986a,b; Shinkai 1990) as well as in some theridiids (Szlep 1966; Eberhard in press b). Perhaps Modisimus. sp. cannot effectively re- move lines already laid, and must correct early mistakes in skeleton web construction by adding subsequent short lines which change the outline of the lower margin of the mesh which is being formed, in effect replacing the earlier lines by lowering the site where the sheet will be made. This implies that at least some of the tangle above the sheet may represent exploration behavior. However, I was unable to discard the alternative possibility that differences in the height and numbers of lines in tangles represented adjust- ments to particular website characteristics. Several other pholcids make more or less domed sheets {Blechwscelis sp. and Modisimus spp.-Eberhard & Briceno 1985; Physocyclus glo- 6o.9M5-Eberhard in press a). More or less domed sheets also occur in several other families such as Diguetidae (Nuessly & Goeden 1984), Ther- idiidae (Main 1976; Shinkai 1984), Hypochili- dae (Shear 1969), Linyphiidae (Nielsen 1931; Kaston 1948), and Araneidae (Kullmann 1964; Shinkai 1984). The functional significance of the domed form is not clear. Domed sheets might 34 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY be designed to capture prey which is flying up- ward, as a dome could work in a manner anal- ogous to a malaise trap, using the prey’s tendency to fly upward to channel it toward the spider. However, Modisimus. sp. often built new webs just above the remains of previous sheets (Fig. 2). These old webs would make it difficult for prey to reach the new web from below, and thus argue against the malaise trap interpretation, at least for this species. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank C. Deeleman-Reinhold for kindly identifying the spiders, and Y. Lubin and G. Mil- ler for comments on a previous draft. Financial support was provided by General Research Funds of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, and the Vicerrectoria de Investigacion of the Universidad de Costa Rica. LITERATURE CITED Briceno, R. D. 1985. Sticky balls in webs of the spider Modisimus sp. (Araneae, Pholcidae). J. Arachnol., 13:267-269. Coddington, J. 1986a. Orb webs in “non-orb weav- ing” ogre-faced spiders (Araneae: Dinopidae): a question of genealogy. J. Cladistics, 2:53-67. Coddington, J. 1986b. The monophyletic origin of the orb web. Pp. 317-363. In Spiders— Webs, Be- havior, and Ecology (W. Shear, ed.). Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford. Deeleman-Reinhold, C. 1986. Leaf-dwelling Phol- cidae in Indo-Australian rain forests. Pp. 45-48. In Proceedings of Ninth International Congress of Ar- achnology, Panama (W. Eberhard, Y. Lubin & B. Robinson, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington. Eberhard, W. G. 1982. Behavioral characters for the higher classification of orb-weaving spiders. Evo- lution, 36:1067-1095. Eberhard, W. G. 1988. Memory of distances and directions moved as cues during temporary spiral construction in the spider Leucauge mariana (Ara- neae: Araneidae). J. Ins. Behav., 1:51-66. Eberhard, W. G. 1990a. Function and phytogeny of spider webs. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 21:341-372. Eberhard, W. G. 1990b. Early stages of orb construc- tion by Philoponella vicina, Leucauge mariana, and Nephila clavipes spiders (Araneae: Uloboridae and Tetragnathidae) and their phylogenetic implica- tions. J. Arachnol., 18:205-234. Eberhard, W. G. in press a. Notes on the behaviour and ecology of Physocyclus globosus (Araneae, Phol- cidae). Bull. British Arachnol. Soc. Eberhard, W. G. in press b. Chrosiothes tonala (Ara- neae, Theridiidae): a web-building spider special- izing on termites. Psyche. Eberhard, W. G. & R. D. Briceno 1983. Chivalry in pholcid spiders. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 13:189- 195. Eberhard, W. G. & R. D. Briceno 1985. Behavior and ecology of four species of Modisimus and Ble- chroscelis (Pholcidae). Rev. Arachnol., 6:29-36. Foelix, R. 1982. Biology of Spiders. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass. Forster, R. R. & L. M. Forster. 1973. New Zealand Spiders. Collins, London. Kaston, B. J. 1948. Spiders of Connecticut. Bull. State Geol. Nat. Hist. Surv., 70:1-874. Kirchner, W. 1 986. Das Netz der Zitterspinne (Phol- cus phalangioides Fuesslin) (Araneae: Pholcidae). Zool. Anz. 216:151-169. Kullmann, E. 1964. Neue Ergibnisse uber den Netz- bau und das Sexualverhalten einiger Spinnenarten. Z. Zool. Syst. Evol., 2:41-122. Lamoral, B. H. 1968. On the nest and web structure of Latrodectus in South Africa, and some observa- tions on body colouration of L. geometricus (Ara- neae: Theridiidae). Ann. Natal Mus., 20:1-14. Lehtinen, P. T. 1967. Classification of the cribellate spiders and some allied families, with notes on the evolution of the suborder Araneomorpha. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 4:199-468. Levi, H. W., L. R. Levi, & H. S. Zim. 1968, Spiders and their Kin. Western Pub. Co., Racine, Wise. Main, B. Y. 1976. Spiders. Collins, London. Nielsen, E. 1931. The Biology of Spiders, Vol. 11. Levin & Munksgaard, Copenhagen. Nuessly, G. S. & R. D. Goeden 1984. Aspects of the biology and ecology of Diguetia mojavea Gertsch (Araneae, Diguetidae). J. Arachnol., 12:75-85. Shear, W. 1969. Observations on the predatory be- havior of the spider Hypochilus gertschi Hoffman (Hypochilidae). Psyche, 76:407-417. Shear, W. 1986. Taxonomic glossary. Pp. 403-432. In Spiders— Webs, Behavior, and Ecology (W. Shear, ed.), Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, California. Shinkai, E. 1990. Observations on the web structure and predatory behavior in Ogulnius pullus Bos. et Str. Atypus, 96:19-24. Shinkai, E. 1984. A Fieldguide to the Spider of Japan. Tokai Univ. Press, Tokai, Japan. Szlep, R. 1 966. The web structure of Latrodectus var- iolus Walckener and L. bishopi Kaston. Israel J. Zool., 15:89-94. Manuscript received May 1991, revised August 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:35-39 VARIATION IN SCHIZOCOSA (ARANEAE: LYCOSIDAE), METAPHIDIPPUS AND PHIDIPPUS (ARANEAE: SALTICIDAE)' William W. M. Steiner and Matthew H. Greenstone: Biological Control of Insects Research Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, P.O.B. 7629, Columbia, Missouri 65205 USA Gail E. Stratton: Department of Biology, Albion College, Albion, Michigan 49224 USA ABSTRACT. Allozyme variation was examined in five species of solitary spiders collected in Illinois and Missouri including Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz), S. stridulans Stratton, A. rovneri Uetz & Dondale, Phidippus clams Keyserling, and Metaphidippus galathea (Walckenaer). The average number of alleles per locus was small, and the average heterozygosity ranged from 2.3 to 12.5. The percent of polymorphic loci ranged from 16.6 to 66.7%. For one species, P. clams, a Missouri population is compared to a population from South Carolina (Terranova & Roach 1987). Overall, the genetic variability estimates are lower than those for other North American spiders. However, the observed genetic variation is approximately four times higher than that observed in communal spiders. Genetic variation is generally considered nec- essary, if not crucial, to a species’ ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions. Recently, Terranova & Roach (1987) reported electropho- retic variation at 1 2 isozyme loci in 7 species of the solitary spider genus Phidippus collected from South Carolina. They found high estimates of variation with 41.6% of loci polymorphic and a mean heterozygosity of 1 1.7%. In contrast, Lubin & Crozier (1985) investi- gated 21 enzyme systems and found only one polymorphic isozyme locus in the social spider Achaeamna wau Levi of New Guinea. The vari- ation occurred in only 6 of 30 naturally-occurring colonies. Thus 24 of the colonies displayed no polymorphism in the form of variable enzyme systems in the 2 1 enzymes which were examined. Lubin and Crozier hypothesized that social spiders will have lower variation as a result of close inbreeding within the colony. Their work seems to be supported by subsequent studies of social spiders and what is known about inbreed- ing and genetic variation in eusocial Hymenop- tera (Graur 1985; Berkelhamer 1983; Reeve et al. 1983; Owen 1983). Smith (1986) examined 51 electrophoretic loci in South American and Central American populations of the social spi- der Anelosimus eximius Simon and found seven loci segregating. A mean heterozygosity of 0.060 'Any mention of a proprietary product in this article does not indicate endorsement by the USDA-ARS. was found, with only two of seven colonies sam- pled showing within-colony polymorphism. Roeloffs & Riechert ( 1 988) sampled 44 nests from 17 colonies of Agelena consociata Denis from Gabon in Africa. In this social spider, the mean genetic distance between nests belonging to dif- ferent colonies was significantly higher than that among nests of the same colony, suggesting that nests within an area were part of a single pan- mictic unit. The mean heterozygosity for 22 loci was 0.0 1 8 but each nest was polymorphic at 5.5% of loci examined. On the average, one of the seven loci was found to be polymorphic in each nest. Uetz et al. ( 1 986) studied Metepeira species of communal-territorial spiders considered “in- termediate” in social versus solitary behavior. They found heterozygosity ranging from 0.09 to 0.21 in three species; variation was lowest in the most communal species. In this report, we determine the extent of ge- netic variation in additional genera of solitary spiders from the United States. If solitary spiders can be shown to have low to nonexistent genetic variation, then the Lubin-Crozier hypothesis is weakened and explanations other than inbreed- ing must be invoked. METHODS Spiders were caught individually and taken alive to the USDA, ARS Biological Control of Insects Research Laboratory (BCIRL) where they were frozen at -80 °C until electrophoresis was 35 36 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1 Allozyme loci, abbreviations and enzyme classification numbers assigned by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (1973). A dehydrogenase is designated by DH. Protein Enzyme Commission Number No. of loci encoded Abbreviation Acid phosphatase 3. 1.3.2 2 ACPH Adenylate kinase 2.7.4.3 1 ADK Esterase 3. 1.1.1 4 EST Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate DH 1.2.1.12 1 G-3-PDH a-glycerophosphate DH 1.1. 1.8 2 a-GPDH Hexokinase 2. 7. 1.1 1 HK Hydroxy-|8-butyric acid DH no number 1 H-(3-BDH Isocitrate DH 1.1.1.42 2 IDH Malate DH 1.1.1.37 2 MDH Phosphoglucomutase 2.7.5. 1 1 PGM Phosphoglucose isomerase 5.3. 1.9 1 PGI 6-phosphogluconate DH 1.1.1.44 1 6-PGDH Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase 2.6. 1.1 2 GOT performed. The Schizocosa species were taken at Sand Ridge State Forest {S. ocreata and S. stri- dulans) or at Chautaqua National Wildlife Ref- uge {S. rovneri) in Mason County, Illinois. Phi- dippus clams and M galathea were collected from the University of Missouri’s Tucker Natural Prairie Preserve, a tall grass prairie remnant lo- cated along Interstate Highway 70 in Callaway County, Missouri (Drew 1947). Starch gel electrophoresis and histochemical staining were performed as described by Steiner & Joslyn (1979), to reveal the proteins listed in Table 1 . Protein abbreviations used in this study are also listed there. Sigma starch (Sigma Chem- ical Co., St. Louis, Missouri) was used at a con- centration of 1 2%, and the 1 cm thick gels were horizontally-sliced into 1 mm thick gel slices for differential enzyme staining. Two electrode-gel buffer systems were used (Steiner & Joslyn 1979). The first consisted of a LiOH/Boric acid (pH 8.2) electrode buffer and a Trizma base/citric acid (pH 8.4) gel buffer on which PGI, PGM, EST and ACPH were stained. The second consisted of a continuous Trizma base/citric acid electrode buffer (pH 8.1) and gel buffer (pH 8.5) system on which were stained GOT, 6-PGDH, HK, ADK, a-GPDH, IDH, G- 3-PDH, and The allelic bases of the observed isozyme variations were determined using traditional crossing methods to study in- heritance patterns and are presented elsewhere (Steiner & Greenstone, 1991). Allele homologies among the different species were not determined. The derived genetic statistics are as follows. Average number of alleles/locus (A/L) is deter- mined by counting the total revealed by electro- phoresis across all loci within a species and di- viding by the number of loci examined. The percent of loci polymorphic (%LP) is determined by dividing those which are segregating for two or more alleles by the total number of loci ex- amined within a species. The mean observed per- cent heterozygosity (%H) is determined by counting the total number of heterozygotes across all loci in a species, dividing by the product of the number of specimans analyzed x number of loci analyzed, and taking the dividend x 100. In general, as the allele frequencies at a locus be- come equal, the higher the %H will be. High numbers of alleles (high A/L) and of loci poly- morphic (high %LP) may be indicative of mu- tation rate or heterotic selection but do not nec- essarily correlate with %H. Because of the low numbers of individuals analyzed for each species in this study, we do not presume gene frequencies will be in Castle-Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, which could also affect expected heterozygosity estimates, since these numbers may be biased due to sampling error. RESULTS A total of 2 1 isozyme loci coding for 1 3 en- zymes was observed across all species. Table 2 indicates each species’ genetic profile. The num- ber of loci observed within a species differs from one species to the next, depending on what could be resolved and interpreted. Thus in each of the Schizocosa spp. 1 2 enzyme loci are examined for STEINER ET AL.- GENETIC VARIATION IN FIVE SPIDER SPECIES 37 Table 2.— Summary of genetic variability for five American Midwest species of arachnids. In the variable loci, a maximum of only 2 alleles were observed for any one locus except where indicated in parentheses. The number of heterozygotes observed are listed over the sample size for that locus. Designations for loci which show no or poor results are indicated for those wishing to pursue genetic investigations of these or other spider species. Abbreviations: B = blurry, not scorable; NA = not analyzed; NP = not present after staining; V = variable but not scorable; see Table 1 for locus abbreviations. Protein locus Schizocosa ocreata Schizocosa rovneri Schizocosa stridulans Phidippus clarus Metaphidippus galathea ACPH-1 NA NA NA 1/22 0/27 ACPH-2 NA NA NA nil 0/27 ADK-1 NA NA NA 0/22 5/27 EST-1 0/10 2/11 0/5 NP 9/27 EST-2 0/10 2/10 0/5 V, B V, B EST-3 NP NP NP V, B V, B (3) EST-4 NP 1/10 NP NP V, B a-GPDH-l 0/10 3/12 0/5 0/22 11/27 a-GPDH-2 NP NP NP NP 0/27 GOT-1 B B B 0/22 9/27 GOT-2 B B B 0/22 0/27 G-3-PDH 0/10 0/12 0/5 0/22 0/27 H-/3-BDH NA NA NA 0/22 NA HK-1 0/10 1/12 0/5 0/22 0/27 IDH-1 0/10 NA 1/5 nil 4/27 IDH-2 0/10 0/12 0/5 NP 0/27 MDH-1 4/10 4/12 1/5 0/22 0/27 MDH-2 0/10 0/12 1/5 0/22 0/27 PGI 0/10 1/12 0/5 B 0/27 PGM 1/10 0/9 0/4 nil 0/27 6-PGDH 1/10 4/12 (3) 0/5 0/22 6/27 Alleles/locus 1.25 1.66 1.25 1.20 1.25 % polymorphic 16.60 66.70 25.00 37.50 45.00 % heterozygosity 5.00 12.50 5.00 2.30 9.60 variation compared to 1 6 in P. dams and 20 in M. galathea. The most variable systems were the esterases, but band overlap between loci on the same gel slice sometimes prevented accurate scoring of a particular esterase system. Only loci which could be reliably scored as heterozygous or homozygous were used to develop genetic pro- files. 'Yh\isADK-2 and HK-2 were not scored and were ignored as they showed up inconsistently and then with only a trace of activity on the gels. Only those esterase loci which could be clearly seen and scored for heterozygosity were included in the final estimate for percent loci polymorphic (Table 2). At most, we did not observe more than two alleles at any polymorphic locus in any one spe- cies with the exception of EST-3 in M. galathea and 6-PGDH in 5”. rovneri which had 3 alleles each (parentheses. Table 2). The average number of alleles/locus ranged from 1.20-1.66. The per- cent of loci segregating for two or more alleles ranged from 16.6-66.7 with an average around 38.67%. The mean observed heterozygosity ranged from 5.0-12.5 depending on the species examined, with an overall mean of 6.8. DISCUSSION The percent of loci polymorphic which we found in the Missouri P. dams is listed in Table 2 and is 37.5%, very similar to the average of 4 1 .6% observed for all 7 Phidippus species in the study by Terranova & Roach (1987). However, our average heterozygosity is only 2.3% for P. dams and does not come close to the average variability of 1 1.8% seen in the South Carolina populations of this species. The low levels of variation we observe in the Missouri P. dams is in sharp contrast to that observed in South Carolina. A third as many loci are polymorphic in the 12 loci Terranova and Roach examined compared to the 16 loci we can score for the presence of variation. The variation 38 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY observed in the South Carolina population oc- curs at PGI,AAT, IDH-1, MDH-1, MDH-2 and amylase, while that occurring in Missouri is at the PGM, IDH-1, EST-2, EST-3, ACPH-1 and ACPH-2 loci. The lower heterozygosity seen in Missouri P. darns is one fifth that of South Car- olina and is probably due to the polymorphic loci in the Missouri population having lower gene frequencies for alternative alleles. Such differences in population genetic struc- ture are indicative of adaptive processes at work, and leave room for further question and study. It may be that Midwest populations suffer more often from severe, climatically induced, bottle- necks in population density which are a conse- quence of harsher winters. Even cultural prac- tices of farmers might play a role if insecticide use is higher in, say, the Midwest, acting to re- duce genetic variation through direct selection pressure. These possiblities could explain the dif- ferences we observe in Missouri P. darns and can be contrasted with effects due to more in- herent phenomena such as breeding structure. For example, Lubin (pers. commun.) points out that low levels of variation might be a conse- quence of breeding system as seen in solitary wasps. Given the small sample sizes, the five Midwest species of solitary spiders have almost four times the genetic variation observed in A. wan by Lu- bin & Crozier (1985). Other solitary spiders, in- cluding the genera Meta (Pennington 1 979), Nes- ticns (Cesaroni et al. 1981), and Aranens (Manchenko 1981), have relatively high levels of genetic variability reflected as isozyme poly- morphism as well. These results tend to support the Lubin-Crozier hypothesis. Testing further the robustness of the hypothesis requires more elec- trophoretic studies of social spiders from more diverse geographic areas and disparate temperate zones and a study of solitary spiders from the area where A. wan is endemic. Certainly the range of genetic variation can vary greatly within a genus as we see here in Schizocosa and as Ter- ranova & Roach (1987) observed in Phidippus. A more meaningful approach might be to look at closely related social and non-social spiders (e. g., see Smith 1987). Finally, we would point out the significance of having similar levels of variation in S. stridulans and S. ocreata. These species often occur sym- patrically and may share certain life history strat- egies. Similarities in variability between sym- patrically-occurring species is consistent with the idea that micro-evolutionary or adaptive pro- cesses transcend species status. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Clyde Morgan for his expertise in caring for the Phidippns and Metaphidippus sam- ples. We also thank the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia for permission to work at Tucker Prairie, and Felix Breden, Yael Lubin, Ian McDonald, Susan Riechert and George Uetz for comments and suggestions, although the final interpretations must remain our own. LITERATURE CITED Cesaroni, C., G. Allegrucci, M. Caccone, M. Sbordoni, E. De Matthaeis & 1. Sbordoni. 1981. Genetic variability and divergence between populations of species of Nesticus cave spiders. Genetica, 56:81- 92. Berkelhamer, R. C. 1983. Intraspecific genetic vari- ation and haplodiploidy, eusociality, and polygyny in the Hymenoptera. Evolution, 37:540-545. Drew, W. B. 1947. Floristic composition of grazed and ungrazed prairie vegetation in North-Central Missouri. Ecology, 28:26-41. Graur, D. 1985. Gene diversity in Hymenoptera. Evolution, 39: 190-199. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry and the International Union of Biochemistry. 1973. Enzyme Nomenclature. Elsevier Scientific Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 443. Lubin, Y. D. & R. H. Crozier. 1985. Electrophoretic evidence for population differentiation in a social spider Achearanea wau (Theridiidae). Insectes Soc. Paris, 32:297-304. Manchenko, G. P. 1981. Allozymic variation in Ar- aneus ventricosns (Arachnida, Aranei). Isozyme Bull., 14:78. Owen, R. E. 1983. Difficulties with the interpretation of patterns of genetic variation in the eusocial Hy- menoptera. Evolution, 39:201-205. Pennington, B. J. 1979. Enzyme genetics in taxon- omy: diagnostic enzyme loci in the spider genus Meta. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 4:377-392. Reeve, H. K., J. S. Reeve & D. W. Pfennig. 1983. Eusociality and genetic variability: a re-evaluation. Evolution, 39: 200-201. Roeloffs, R. & S. E. Riechert. 1988. Dispersal and population genetic structure of the cooperative spi- der, Agelena consodata, in West African rain forest. Evolution, 42:173-183. Smith, D. R. 1986. Population genetics of Anelosi- mus eximius (Araneae, Theridiidae). J. Arachnol., 14:201-217. Smith, D. R. 1987. Genetic variation in solitary and cooperative spiders of the genus Anelosimus (Ara- neae: Theridiidae). In Chemistry and Biology of So- STEINER ET AL.- GENETIC VARIATION IN FIVE SPIDER SPECIES 39 cial Insects. Proc. 10th Int. Congr. lUSSI (J. Eder & H. Rembold, eds.). Verlag J. Pepemgy, Munich. Steiner, W. W. M. & D. J. Joslyn. 1979. Electropho- retic techniques for the genetic study of mosquitoes. Mosq. News, 39:35-54. Steiner, W. W. M. & M. H. Greenstone. 1991. Seg- regation studies of isozyme variation in Metaphid- dippus galathea (Araneae: Salticidae). J. ArachnoL, 19:157-160. Terranova, A. C. & S. H. Roach. 1987. Genetic dif- ferentiation in the genus Phidippus (Araneae, Sal- ticidae). J. ArachnoL, 14:385-391. Uetz, G. W., T. C. Kane, G. E. Stratton & M. J. Benton. 1986. Environmental and genetic influences on the social grouping tendency of a communal spider. Pp.43-53. /« Evolutionary Genetics of Invertebrate Behavior; Progress and Prospects (M. D. Huettel, ed.). Plenum Press, New York. Manuscript received January 1991, revised December 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:40^6 SYSTEM ATICS OF HYPOCHILUS SHEARI AND HYPOCHILUS COY LEI, TWO SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN LAMPSHADE SPIDERS (ARANEAE, HYPOCHILIDAE) Ronald P. Huff and Frederick A. Coyle: Department of Biology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina 28723 USA ABSTRACT: A quantitative analysis of variation of genital characters among 16 population samples supports Platnick’s (Forster et al. 1987) hypothesis that Hypochilus sheari Platnick and Hypochilus coylei Platnick are separate species. Both the width and tip length of the conductor separate these species unambiguously, and an index of spermathecal dimensions distinguishes the otherwise very similar females of each species. A conductor tip synapomorphy indicates that these are probably sister species. Extensive field work indicates that these species are confined to a 35 mile north-south mountain corridor in six counties of western North Carolina and are separated by five miles. It is suggested that subtle deficits in habitat due to a constriction of the mountain corridor and the presence of a watershed divide may have bisected the parent stock and may be maintaining the allopatry of the daughter species. Both species appear to have a two year life cycle and commonly to feed on gryllacridid crickets and cursorial spiders. In a review of the hypochiloid and austrochi- loid spiders (Forster et al. 1987), Platnick de- scribed two similar species of Appalachian Hy- pochilus which he separated on the basis of minor differences in genital morphology observed in small samples. Hypochilus coylei was described from ten males and nine females from three neighboring sites, and H. sheari was described from three males and three females from a single site 27 mi from the H. coylei sites. The primary goals of this study are (1) to test more rigorously Platnick’s hypothesis that these two morphs are different species and the alternative hypothesis that his samples might simply represent geo- graphic variants of a single species, and (2) to define accurately their geographic ranges. More- over, we hope this study will foster the kinds of research and management decisions needed to protect the habitat of these unusual (Forster et al. 1987) and geographically restricted spiders. METHODS During 1987 (August to November) and 1988 (March to November) we searched for Hypochi- lus in the region around the sites where these species were first collected. When a deme was encountered, we collected only as many adults of each sex as we felt we could without threat- ening the deme’s survival. Material Examined.-Collection data for all speci- mens used in this study are listed below by species and county (all in North Carolina). Specimens will be de- posited in the AMNH. Each site (deme) is identified on the map (Fig. 12) by its letter/number code. Throughout this report we use the term “deme” for each local population, and the terms “morph” or “spe- cies” for all demes (collectively) of each putative spe- cies. Hypochilus sheari: BUNCOMBE CO.; S/ — Long Branch Creek, 0.8 mi N on Long Branch Road from Bee Tree Road, rock outcrop along road on right, elev. 3100 ft, 28 Sept. 1987, 3 males, 5 females; 6 Oct. 1987, 1 male, 1 female; 15 Oct. 1988, 10 males, 13 females, 1 egg sac; MCDOWELL CO.; 5'2-Buck Creek, 9.9 mi N of US 70 on NC 80, dry exposed rock face on right of highway, elev. 3400 ft, 1 Sept. 1987, 10 males, 5 females; 5i— Curtis Creek, 5 mi up Curtis Creek road from US 70, rock outcrop on left of road, elev. 2500 ft, 13 Sept. 1987, 3 males, 1 female; 16 July 1988, 1 male, 2 females; 24 Sept. 1988, 1 male, 2 females, 1 egg sac; 54— Mill Creek, 0.2 mi SE of Andrews Geyser, large rock outcrop on left, elev. 3100 ft, 29 Sept. 1987, 1 male, 3 females; 6 Oct. 1987, 12 males, 15 females; 24 Sept. 1988, 3 males, 5 females, 1 egg sac; 55 — Newberry Creek, 1.5 mi W on Newberry Creek from Curtis Creek confluence, rock outcrop on either side of road, elev. 2400 ft, 13 Sept. 1987, 7 males, 10 fe- males; 24 Sept. 1988, 3 males, 2 females; YANCEY CO.; 56— Upper Crabtree Falls, Blue Ridge Parkway, elev. 3200 ft, 1 Sept. 1987, 6 males, 5 females. Hypochilus coylei: BUNCOMBE CO.; C7— Garren Creek, approx. 0.5 mi up Owenby Gap Road from intersection of Eads Gap Road, disturbed rock above stream on left, elev. 3100 ft, 19 Sept. 1987, 1 male, 4 females; C2— Round Mountain, 4 mi NE of NC 9 on Bat Cave Road, rock outcrops on left above road, elev. 40 HUFF & COYLE-SYSTEMATICS OF TWO HYPOCHILUS SPECIES 41 Figures \-l .—Hypochilus genitalia: 1-2, H. sheari male palpus (traced from Forster et al. 1987) showing measurement characters; 1, retrolateral; 2, prolateral; 3-6, approximately retrolateral views of palpal conductor; 3-4, H. coylei showing measurement characters; 3, from C7; 4, from C6; 5-6, H. shearr, 5, from SI; 6, from S3; 7, H. sheari spermathecae from S4 showing measurement characters. 3200 ft, 9 Oct. 1988, 2 males, 2 females, 1 egg sac; HENDERSON CO.; Ci- Hickory Creek, 1 mi SE Gerton on US 74, rock outcrop on either side of road, elev. 2575 ft, 13 Aug. 1987, 9 females; 3 Oct. 1987, 1 female; 6 Oct. 1987,2 females; 1 4 Oct. 1988,2 females; C4 — Minihaha Falls, 0.8 mi N on NC 9 from US 74, rock outcrop below road on left, elev. 1600 ft, 13 Aug. 1987, 2 males, 5 females; C5— Reedy Patch Creek, 10.5 mi E of 1-26 on US 64, rock face above creek on right, elev. 2000 ft, 21 Aug. 1987, 1 male, 2 females; C6— Tumbreeches Creek, approx. 1 mi SW of US 64, rock outcrop on left, elev. 2400 ft, 3 Oct. 1987,6 males. 42 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1 . — Descriptive statistics for the quantitative characters found most useful in distinguishing Hypochilus sheari from Hypochilus coylei. Character abbreviations defined in Methods section. Measurements in mm. Hypochilus sheari Hypochilus coylei Character n Range Mean SD n Range Mean SD Male CTL 56 0.075-0.120 0.093 0.010 43 0.045-0.065 0.057 0.005 PCW 50 0.045-0.068 0.058 0.005 41 0.075-0.113 0.093 0.008 PCW(100)/CTL 50 41.7-83.9 62.5 8.3 41 132-221 164 19.8 Female CW 69 2.50-3.75 3.11 0.24 57 2.85^.40 3.65 0.33 LSL 69 0.110-0.263 0.179 0.032 50 0.160-0.348 0.251 0.040 MXMD 68 0.103-0.170 0.135 0.016 48 0.070-0.128 0.101 0.013 MXMD(100)/LSL 68 57.7-131.8 77.5 14.4 48 28.8-55.6 40.9 7.1 MXMD(100)/CW 66 3.3-6. 1 4.4 0.6 48 2.2-3. 3 2.8 0.3 3 females; POLK CO.; C7— Cliflield Mountain, 2.5 mi W of Mountain View Church, rock faces, elev. 1300 ft, 3 Sept. 1988, 5 males, 8 females; RUTHERFORD CO.; C(S— Bat Cave Nature Preserve, 1 mi SE of Bat Cave village, cliffs below cave, elev. 1600-1800 ft, 3 Oct. 1987, 2 males, 3 females; C9— Broad River, 1.3 mi E of NC 9 on US 74 (0.3 mi NW of start of Rainbow Falls Trail), disturbed rock on either side of river, elev. 1300 ft, 3 Sept. 1988, 5 males, 4 females; C70— Rain- bow Falls Trail, 1 .6 mi E of NC 9 on US 74, disturbed rock along trail, elev. 1500-2200 ft, 13 Aug. 1987, 6 males, 8 females; 6 Oct. 1987, 13 males, 3 females; 28 May 1988, 4 females; 1 Nov. 1988, 1 egg sac. Characters Examined: — In order to identify characters that might distinguish one or more demes, we focused on genital characters for two reasons: 1) they tend to evolve rapidly and di- vergently (Eberhard 1985, 1990), and 2) Platnick (Forster et al. 1987) used genital characters to differentiate H. coylei and H. sheari. We selected potentially useful genital shape characters, de- fined measurements which alone or in ratio form would represent these shapes, recorded the val- ues of these characters for every specimen, and, with the Statview II (Abacus Concepts, Inc.) sta- tistics program, generated scatter plots to identify any clusters of individuals and/or demes with distinctive values. Carapace width (CW) was used in some of these bivariate analyses to control for body size; CW measurements are accurate to 0.05 mm. A few other potentially useful non-genital characters (e.g. pigmentation patterns) were also surveyed. Male quantitative characters.— The following eight palpal dimensions were measured after re- moving the palp: PL = length of palpal organ in retrolateral view (Fig. 1); PBD = diameter of palpal bulb in retrolateral view (Fig. 1); PTW = width of palpal tarsus perpendicular to PTL at distoventral apophysis in retrolateral view (Fig. 1); PTL = length of palpal tarsus in retrolateral view (Fig. 1); CDL = conductor length in pro- lateral view (Fig. 2); CTL = conductor tip length in approximate retrolateral view (positioned so CTL is maximized), defined as the distance from the conductor tip to the edge of the conductor along the line perpendicular to the line connect- ing the tip of the conductor to the dorsal edge of conductor (Fig. 3); CTH = conductor tip height in retrolateral view, defined as the maximum distance to lower edge of conductor tip from line defined by CTL and perpendicular to CTL (Fig. 3); PCW = palpal conductor width in retrolateral view, measured along the line originating at the midpoint of, and perpendicular to, a line defined as the maximum distance from point where con- ductor edges overlap to inside edge of conductor tip (Fig. 4). CTL, CTH, and PCW were measured with the palpal organ in glycerine under a cov- erslip on a depression slide at 250 x using a Wild M-20 compound microscope with an ocular ret- icle with two perpendicular scales; these mea- surements are accurate to 0.0025 mm. The other measurements were made at 100 x using a Wild M5 stereomicroscope and are accurate to 0.009 mm. Female quantitative characters. —The follow- ing seven spermathecal dimensions were mea- sured (Fig. 7): LSL = lateral stalk length, defined as the maximum distance from junction of lateral and median stalk to end of lateral stalk; MXLD = maximum lateral stalk diameter perpendicular to longitudinal axis of stalk; MNLD = minimum lateral stalk diameter perpendicular to longitu- HUFF & COYLE- SYSTEM ATICS OF TWO HYPOCHILUS SPECIES 43 dinal axis of stalk; MSL = median stalk length; MXMD = maximum median stalk diameter; MNMD = minimum median stalk diameter; MXD = maximum distance from medial edge of median stalk to lateral edge of lateral stalk. The portion of body wall containing spermathe- cae was removed, cleared, and mounted in lactic acid on a glass slide under a coverslip. Measure- ments were recorded from the right spermathe- cae at lOOx using a Bausch and Lomb com- pound microscope and are accurate to 0.005 mm. RESULTS Morphological Variation.— Ma/e characters: T-tests reveal that the two morphs are signifi- cantly dilferent (P < 0.001) for each of the eight palpal characters. Although six of the eight show broad overlap among demes and between morphs, PCW and CTL clearly distinguish the two species (Table 1, Fig. 8). Hypochilus coylei (Figs. 3-4) has a wider conductor (PCW) and a shorter, more sharply bent conductor tip (CTL) than H. sheari (Figs. 5-6). When plotted against each other, these characters produce better sep- aration of the morphs (Fig. 8) than do any other pair of characters. Only one of the pigmentation differences described by Platnick (Forster et al. 1987) helps separate the larger samples we have studied; the pigment patches on the edges of the sternum are confluent in H. coylei but in H. sheari are usually disjunct and seldom appear as a con- tinuous band. The small finger-like apophysis which we discovered extending from the retro- dorsal edge of the conductor near its distal end is usually much longer and easier to see (at 1 00 x ) in H. coylei (Figs. 3-4) than in H. sheari. Female characters: T -tests showed that the two morphs are significantly different (P < 0.00 1) for each spermathecal measurement except MXD. However, for each of these characters, there is broad overlap between the two morphs and among the demes. Nevertheless, highly confident identification of females is possible when the two characters with the least overlap, MXMD and LSL (T able 1 ), are plotted against each other (Fig. 9) and when MXMD is plotted against CW (Fig. 10) . Hypochilus sheari has, on average, wider median bulbs, shorter lateral spermathecae, and a smaller carapace than H. coylei (Fig. 1 1). Nei- ther of the pigment differences described by Plat- nick (Forster et al. 1987) (endite pigmentation, palpal tarsal pigment ring) appear to distinguish any of the demes or separate the morphs. Clinal variation: With one exception (LSL), no 0.12 0.10 PCW 0.08 0.06 0.04 o o8°o coylei ^ R °°L8 8 . sheari •• • ••• • • ti •• 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 CTL 0.12 LSL MXMD 4.6 4.2 3.8 CW 3.4 3.0 2.6 0.06 0.10 0.14 0.18 MXMD Figures 8-10.— Scattergrams of measurement char- acters which best distinguish Hypochilus sheari from H. coylei. Characters defined in Methods section. Mea- surements in mm. 8, males; 9-10, females. clinal pattern was found when the mean of each quantitative character for each deme was ranked (low to high) and mapped. LSL means increased from north to south in H. sheari, but showed no clinal pattern in H. coylei. Habitat and Distribution.-The preferred (most heavily populated) web substrate and habitat for both morphs appears to be the same as that of Hypochilus pococki Platnick (Fergusson 1972). Webs are nearly always on vertical or overhang- ing surfaces of rock outcrops and boulders which are typically beside or near a stream in deciduous or mixed deciduous/conifer forest. With the ex- ception of two demes (S2 and C7), these spiders 44 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 1 1 . — Spermathecae of Hypochilus sheari and H. coylei selected to illustrate range of variation; arranged so that MXMD(100)/LSL values decrease from left to right and from top row to bottom row. Codes identify demes (see Methods section). were seldom found on relatively exposed and dry roek outcrops. Curiously, areas of seemingly fa- vorable habitat but devoid of Hypochilus were found within the known geographic range of each species (Fig. 12). Both H. sheari and H. coylei are confined to a 35 mile north-south mountain corridor that is bounded on the west by the relatively flat and unforested basin of the French Broad River, on the east by low (below 1400 ft elev.), relatively flat Piedmont terrain, and on the north and south by allopatric populations of H. pococki (Fig. 1 2). The H. sheari demes are confined to the northern half and the H. coylei demes to the southern half of this corridor. The two species are separated by an uninhabited five mile zone that includes the divide between their respective watersheds. All known H. sheari demes are in the Catawba River watershed (Atlantic drainage), except for SI, which lies in the French Broad watershed (Gulf drainage). All H. coylei demes are in the Broad River and Green River watersheds (At- lantic drainage). A search in the zone that separates the ranges of H. sheari and H. coylei revealed no sites with preferred substrate and habitat; and although several sites with suboptimal but apparently suit- able substrate and habitat were found, Hypochi- lusnot present. Even such seemingly suitable habitat is rare in this zone because here the mountain corridor is constricted to a width of only a few miles by convergent lobes of the French Broad basin and Piedmont (Fig. 1 2) and includes a divide separating the watersheds occupied by the two species. Life History and Reproductive Biology.— Like H. pococki (Fergusson 1972, Coyle 1985), these species appear to have a two-year life cycle. Me- dium to large juveniles (that had overwintered) constructed webs as early as March 15; these individuals appeared to be large enough to reach maturity later in the year. Adult females began to appear in late May and adult males in late July. Adult males disappeared after early Octo- ber and adult females by the end of October. Juveniles were recorded until late November. New egg sacs were observed from early Septem- ber until late October. Spiderlings emerged from egg sacs in early May; no occupied egg sacs were recorded later than mid-May. Adult males were often found just outside the webs of females. On several occasions (both spe- cies and only after mid-September) single males were observed motionless in webs of adult fe- males, with the male either directly over the fe- male or with the legs of one side held across her, reminiscent of the post-mating position ob- served by Fergusson (1972). Three H. sheari egg sacs contained 44, 74, and 87 eggs, and two H. coylei sacs held 62 and 93 eggs. HUFF & COYLE- SYSTEM ATICS OF TWO HYPOCHILUS SPECIES 45 Figure 12.— Map of a ten county region of western North Carolina showing the known distribution of Hy- pochilus sheari and H. coylei and neighboring sites where H. pococki has been collected. Each sampled deme of H. sheari and H. coylei is identified with code (see Methods section). X’s mark sites with apparently suitable Hypochilus habitat but found to be devoid of Hypochilus. French Broad River basin (stippled) ranges in elevation from about 2000 to 2400 ft. Boundary between mountains (not stippled) and Piedmont (stippled) roughly follows elevation of 1400 ft. Feeding Biology.— Feeding was observed sev- eral times in both morphs (H. coylei: n = 6, H. sheari: n = S) and resembles that of H. pococki (Fergusson 1972). The primary prey type was gryllacridid crickets (//. coylei: n = 3; H. sheari: n = 5) and cursorial spiders, including lycosids (H. sheari: n = 2), gnaphosids {H. coylei: « = 1), and pisaurids {H. coylei: n = 2; H. sheari: n = 1). No spiders were observed feeding on tipulid flies even though they were abundant at many demes. DISCUSSION The results of this study provide strong sup- port for Platnick’s contention that these two Hy- pochilus morphs represent distinct species. The distinct genital morphologies of the two popu- lation clusters (Table 1, Figs. 3-6, 8-10), the vir- tual absence of clinal variation in the characters studied (the demes closest to the geographic gap separating the species are as distinct morpholog- ically as those farthest from the gap), and the absence of hybrid populations indicate that there is no gene flow across the small geographic gap separating them. Whether these allopatric mor- phospecies are also separated by intrinsic repro- ductive isolating mechanisms, and are therefore biological species sensu Mayr ( 1 969), Dobzhan- sky et al. (1977), and Futuyma (1986), can be determined only by courtship and mating trials 46 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY in laboratory situations with appropriate intra- morph controls. However, the fact that the di- agnostically most useful genital features (con- ductor width and conductor tip shape) are those which contact the female most intimately during copulation, hints that H. sheari and H. coylei cannot successfully interbreed. Male genitalic dif- ferences probably are not just manifestations of genetic divergence but may be important in in- fluencing the female’s acceptance of sperm (Eber- hard 1985, 1990) and, consequently, vital parts of the actual mechanism of reproductive isola- tion. Among the many shared character states of H. sheari and H. coylei, there is at least one probable synapomorphy which supports the hypothesis that these are sister species: the conductor tip is abruptly and strongly bent and tapered so that it resembles a beak (Figs. 3-6). We postulate that some event, perhaps divide migration and sub- sequent drainage capture, a common event in the Southern Blue Ridge during Tertiary times (Hack 1969), divided the parent species into two geographic isolates distributed much like they are today. It is not obvious why Hypochilus demes do not exist in the five mile zone separating these species, but we suggest that, because of the drastic constriction of the mountain corridor and the presence of a watershed divide, this region does not contain enough favorable substrate and hab- itat to support persistent populations and allow dispersal. Hypochilus species have not been ob- served to balloon, and observations by Shear (1969) and Fergusson (1972) indicate that only adult males are highly likely to walk from one outcrop to another. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank R. Bruce and D. Pittillo for com- ments on an early draft and R. Bennett and N. Platnick for comments on the manuscript. A Highlands Biological Station grant-in-aid to Huff helped support the field work. LITERATURE CITED Coyle, F. A. 1985. Two-year life cycle and low palpal character variance in a Great Smoky Mountain pop- ulation of the lampshade spider (Araneae, Hypo- chilidae, Hypochilus). J. Arachnol., 13:21 1-218. Dobzhansky, T., F. J. Ayala, G. L. Stebbins & J. W. Valentine. 1977. Evolution. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 572 pp. Eberhard, W. G. 1985. Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass. 244 pp. Eberhard, W. G. 1990. Animal genitalia and female choice. American Sci., 78:134-141. Fergusson,!. 1972. Natural history of the spider //y- pochilus thorelli Marx (Hypochilidae). Psyche, 79: 179-199. Forster, R. R., N. 1. Platnick & M. R. Gray. 1987. A review of the spider superfamilies Hypochiloidea and Austrochiloidea (Araneae, Araneomorphae). Bull. American Mus. Nat. Hist., 185:1-1 16. Futuyma, D. J. 1986. Evolutionary Biology. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, Mass., 600 pp. Hack, J. T. 1969. The area, its geology: Cenozoic development of the Southern Appalachians. Pp. 1- 17, In The Distributional History of the Biota of the Southern Appalachians, Part 1 -Invertebrates (P. C. Holt, ed.). Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacks- burg, VA. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. The Belknap Press, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 797 pp. Shear, W. A. 1969. Observations on the predatory behavior of the spider Hypochilus gertschi Hoffman (Hypochilidae). Psyche, 76:407-^17. Manuscript received September 1991, revised October 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:47-51 ON THE FUNCTION OF HARLEQUIN BEETLE-RIDING IN THE PSEUDOSCORPION, CORDYLOCHERNES SCORPIOIDES (PSEUDOSCORPIONIDA: CHERNETIDAE) David W. Zeh and Jeanne A. Zeh: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0948, APO 34002-0948 USA, or, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Republica de Panama ABSTRACT. The pseudoscorpion, Cordylochernes scorpioides, frequently occurs under the elytra of the giant harlequin beetle, Acrocinus longimanus. Here, we assess four hypotheses/scenarios which have been pro- posed to account for this phenomenon: (1) accidental boarding; (2) obligate symbiosis; (3) phagophily, and (4) phoretic dispersal. Field and laboratory observations of embarkation behavior clearly refute the accidental boarding hypothesis. Contrary to the obligate symbiosis scenario, pseudoscorpion offspring production does not occur on the beetle and the primary habitat of C. scorpioides is decaying trees. The phagophily hypothesis, i.e., that pseudoscorpions mount harlequins for the primary purpose of preying upon the beetles’ phoretic mites, is also not supported. Pseudoscorpions collected from trees were found to be in better nutritional condition than beetle-riding individuals. Finally, evidence from a companion study supports the dispersal hypothesis, and also indicates that large male C. scorpioides defend beetles’ abdomens as strategic sites for intercepting and insem- inating dispersing females. The reason why pseudoscorpions attach to other organisms (generally termed phoresy) is the subject of much debate and little data (see Much- more 1971). In this paper, we evaluate several competing hypotheses put forward to explain the significance of the association between the cher- netid pseudoscorpion, Cordylochernes scor- pioides (L.), and the giant harlequin beetle, Ac- rocinus longimanus (L.) (Cerambycidae). Cordylochernes scorpioides is distributed throughout the tropical forests of Central and South America (Beier 1 948) where it is frequent- ly found under the elytra of harlequin beetles (Beier 1948; Beck 1968; Muchmore 1971; Zeh & Zeh 1991, 1992). This cerambycid also carries mites, occasionally in large numbers, both in small pits on the outer surface of its fore-elytra, and on its thorax, wings and abdomen (Fig. 1). It has been hypothesized that C. scorpioides climbs onto beetles; (1) accidentally; (2) for dis- persal to new habitats, or (3) for “phagophily”, i.e., to feed on the mites (for review see Much- more 1971). The harlequin beetle/pseudoscor- pion relationship has even been presented as ob- ligate symbiosis in which the pseudoscorpions live exclusively on the beetles (Ricklefs 1979). Our three-year study of C. scorpioides (Zeh & Zeh 1991, 1992) and A. longimanus (Zeh et al. 1992) has demonstrated that the primary habitat of this pseudoscorpion is decaying trees in the families Moraceae and Apocynaceae (e.g., Ficus spp. L. and Parahancornia fasciculata (Poiret)). Larval development of A. longimanus also oc- curs in these habitats (Duffy 1 960; G. Tavakilian, pers. comm.; pers. obser.). While all pseudo- scorpion life stages were collected from trees, no nymphs and only one newly-gravid female {N = 1 34 females) were taken from beetles, indicating that pseudoscorpion presence on beetles is strict- ly an adult phenomenon. Field and laboratory observations in Panama and French Guiana were not consistent with the “accident” hypothesis. Pseudoscorpion embar- kation involves a sequence of deliberate, stere- otypical behaviors (Beck 1968) which appears to be triggered by olfactory cues and beetle strid- ulation (pers. obser.). Both in the field and when placed in laboratory containers with harlequin beetles, pseudoscorpions engaged in the char- acteristic lifting of pedipalps (so-called “beck- oning” movements, see Weygoldt 1969) before moving rapidly to the posterior end of the beetle. There, pseudoscorpions gained access to the “sub- elytral space” by repeatedly pinching the beetle’s abdomen, causing abdominal flexure and partial opening of the elytra (Fig. 2). In addition, in decaying Ficus trees, C. scorpioides occurs with several other pseudoscorpion species, e.g., Lus- trochernes sp. Beier, Parachernes plumosus (With) and Semeiochernes armiger (Balzan). We have 47 48 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 1. — Harlequin beetle with elytra opened to display female Cordylochernes scorpioides and unusually heavy infestation of mites. never found individuals of these species under the elytra of harlequin beetles {N = 149 beetles). By contrast, results of our research clearly sup- ported the dispersal hypothesis, demonstrating a pattern in which large numbers of adult pseu- doscorpions boarded beetles on old, depleted trees and disembarked on newly-fallen trees. The study also revealed a novel aspect of the beetle/pseu- doscorpion relationship. Large male C. scor- pioides monopolize beetle abdomens as strategic sites for intercepting and inseminating dispersing females (Zeh & Zeh 1992). METHODS We tested the phagophily hypothesis by com- paring pseudoscorpions taken from beetles with individuals collected from within decaying trees, using abdomen length as a measure of recent food consumption. In pseudoscorpions, no fur- ther molting occurs after the adult stage is reached so that the fully-sclerotized pedipalps and ceph- alothorax are fixed in size (Weygoldt 1969; Zeh 1987). However, the abdomen is only partially sclerotized and enlarges with food intake. Measurement of the abdomen length of beetle- riding pseudoscorpions was restricted to indi- viduals taken from beetles on newly-fallen, un- decayed trees. We excluded pseudoscorpions from beetles collected on older, dead trees with evidence of beetle emergence. This was necessary to ensure that pseudoscorpion abdomen length reliably reflected the nutritional consequences of beetle-riding. Pseudoscorpions climb onto har- lequins soon after the beetles eclose from pupal chambers within old trees (Zeh & Zeh 1992). The post-teneral beetles then rapidly fly off in search of newly-dead trees to mate and oviposit (Zeh et al. 1992). Pseudoscorpions collected from emerging beetles on old trees have therefore only just embarked and are in a nutritional state which largely reflects feeding within the tree and not on the beetle. By contrast, pseudoscorpions taken from a beetle captured on a new tree are likely to have spent a significant period on the beetle’s abdomen during its search for a freshly- dead or dying tree. In Panama, the research was carried out in lowland tropical forest in the Parque Nacional ZEH & ZEH- BEETLE-RIDING IN PSEUDOSCORPIONS 49 Figure 2. — Beetle-boarding behavior of C. scorpioides (see text). Soberania. Eight female and 61 male pseudos- corpions were removed from 58 harlequin bee- tles taken from 7 newly-fallen, undecayed trees. Sixty-nine female and 100 male C. scorpioides were also collected from 16 tree populations in the area. In French Guiana, 30 females and 54 males were removed from 34 beetles collected from 3 newly-fallen trees along the Piste du Kaw, 50 km southeast of Cayenne. An equivalent number of males and females was collected from 1 2 sympatric tree populations. Two interrelated factors confound a direct comparison of the mean abdomen length of beetle-riding versus within-tree pseudoscor- pions. First, although abdomen length varies with nutrition, there are also significant positive cor- relations between abdomen length and sizes of pedipalpal and cephalothorax traits. Second, for our analysis, it was particularly critical to take account of these correlations. Male pseudoscor- pions compete to establish mating territories on the abdomens of beetles and, as a consequence, beetle-riding males are significantly larger overall than males randomly-sampled from trees (Zeh & Zeh 1992). Therefore, even in the absence of nutritional differences, mean abdomen length is expected to be larger in beetle-riding pseudo- scorpions. Direct comparison of mean abdomen lengths Table 1. — Results of principal components (PC) analysis of nine traits of the pedipalps and cephalo- thorax in C. scorpioides. PC analyses were carried out separately by gender and geographic location. Prop. = Proportion of total morphological variation explained by PCI. Trait Trait loading on PCI FG female FG male PN female PN male MFL 0.140 0.080 0.135 0.080 HL 0.139 0.121 0.092 0.1 14 HD 0.131 0.230 0.147 0.204 TL 0.077 0.104 0.134 0.106 TD 0.180 0.160 0.179 0.197 FL 0.182 0.098 0.137 0.103 FD 0.094 0.104 0.203 0.129 CL 0.121 0.064 0.089 0.054 CW 0.186 0.093 0.156 0.072 Prop. 0.637 0.897 0.61 1 0.886 50 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY tijO OJ 0) PCI Score of Sclerotized Traits Figures 3-6.— Comparison of relative abdomen length in C. scorpioides from trees versus individuals from harlequin beetles (HB) (see text for explanation). Analysis carried out separately by gender and geographic location (FG = French Guiana; PN = Panama). in the two environments was carried out, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) which fac- tored out the correlation between sclerotized trait size and length of the abdomen. The ANCOVA analysis is most clearly interpreted by first de- riving a single, composite measure of size for the nine sclerotized traits we measured. This was obtained by performing principal components analysis (PCA) in which the first principal com- ponent (PCI) provides the single best measure of overall size (see Bookstein et al. 1985). Sclerotized traits included in the analysis were: chelal movable finger length (MFL); chelal hand length (HL) and depth (HD); tibia length (TL) and depth (TD); femur length (FL) and depth (FD), and cephalothorax length (CL) and pos- terior width (CW) (see Chamberlin 1931). Mea- surements were taken from photographs of live individuals restrained with pedipalps fully ex- tended under a glass slide (Kodak Technical Pan film, Nikon FE2 camera, 55 mm Micro-Nikkor lens with 55 mm extension). The negative image of each specimen was then projected onto a com- puter-linked digitizing tablet (Summagraphics MM 1201) and the coordinates of 38 anatomical landmarks on the dorsal outline of the body and ZEH & ZEH- BEETLE-RIDING IN PSEUDOSCORPIONS 51 right pedipalp (plus two scale bar points) were recorded. The 9 traits were then computed from the coordinates. Principal component (PC) scores were calculated from the covariance matrix of In-transformed measurements. All traits loaded positively on PCI (Table 1) which therefore rep- resents a composite measure of overall size (see Bookstein et al. 1 985). To avoid negative values, the traits (measured in mm) were first multiplied by 10 before natural logarithmic transformation. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS© (SAS Institute, 1988). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In the analysis of covariance, abdomen length represented the dependent variable, PCI score of the sclerotized traits the covariate, and “envi- ronment”, i.e., beetle versus tree, the indepen- dent categorical variable. Results demonstrated that, in both the Panamanian (PN) and French Guianan (FG) populations, adjusted mean ab- domen length (least squares mean or LSM) of pseudoscorpions on trees (LSMxree) exceeded that of beetle-riding individuals (LSMhb) in both fe- males (FG: LSM-r^ee = 3.45, LSMhb = 3.36, F.,57 = 4.60, P = 0.036; PN: LSM-r,,e = 3.50, LSMhb = 3.23, F, 74 = 13.88, P < 0.001) and males (FG: LSM^^ee = 3.44, LSMhb = 3.36, F, ,05 = 4.94, P = 0.028; PN: LSMi-^^e = 3.36, LSM„b = 3.26, F,,,56 = 8.26, P = 0.005) (see Figs. 3-6). This suggests that individuals within trees are better nourished than their counterparts on beetles. While our observations confirmed that beetle- riding pseudoscorpions do prey on the harle- quin’s mites, the results presented here were not consistent with Vachon’s (1940) hypothesis that phagophily is the primary motivation for the as- sociation. Finally, we suggest that, based on purely phys- iological considerations, the phagophily hypoth- esis seems flawed. Like other arachnids, pseu- doscorpions feed by injecting digestive enzymes into their prey and then sucking out the dissolv- ing tissue (Weygoldt 1969). External digestion enables C. scorpioides to exploit relatively large prey such as the dipteran and coleopteran larvae available in decaying trees. By contrast, such a feeding technique seems particularly ill-suited for specialization on the small mites resident on har- lequin beetles. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank W. B. Muchmore and V. Mahnert for identifying the pseudoscorpions, W. B. Muchmore and P. Weygoldt for useful com- ments on the manuscript, and R. E. Strauss for providing the digitizing data acquisition and dis- tance computing programs. We also thank the Panamanian Instituto Nacional de Recursos Na- turales Renovables (INRENARE) for permis- sion to carry out the work. Both authors grate- fully acknowledge fellowship support from the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute. LITERATURE CITED Beck, L. 1 968. Aus den Regenwaldem am Amazonas I. Natur und Mus., 98:24-32. Beier, M. 1948. Phoresie und Phagophilie bei Pseu- doscorpionen. Osterreich. Zool. Z., 1:441-497. Bookstein, F. L., B. Chemoff, R. L. Elder, J. M. Hum- phries, G. R. Smith & R. E. Strauss. 1985. Mor- phometries in Evolutionary Biology: The Geometry of Size and Shape Change with Examples from Fish- es. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia Spec. Publ. 15. Chamberlin, J. C. 1931. The arachnid order Chelo- nethida. Stanford Univ. Publ. Biol. Sci., 7:1-284. Duffy, E. A. J. 1960. A Monograph of the Immature Stages of Neotropical Timber Beetles. British Mus. Nat. Hist., London, U.K. Muchmore, W. B. 1971. Phoresy by North and Cen- tral American pseudoscorpions. Proc. Rochester Acad. Sci., 12:79-97. Ricklefs, R. E. 1979. Ecology, 2nd ed. Chiron Press, New York. SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. Cary, North Carolina. Vachon, M. 1940. Remarques sur la phoresie des Pseudoscorpions. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, 109:1-18. Weygoldt, P. 1969. The biology of pseudoscorpions. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Zeh, D. W. 1987. Life history consequences of sexual dimorphism in a chemetid pseudoscorpion. Ecol- ogy, 68:1495-1501. Zeh, D. W. & J. A. Zeh. 1991. Novel use of silk by the harlequin beetle-riding pseudoscorpion, Cor- dylochernes scorpioides (Pseudoscorpionida, Cher- netidae). J. Arachnol., 19:153-154. Zeh, D. W. & J. A. Zeh. 1992. Dispersal-generated sexual selection in a beetle-riding pseudoscorpion. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 30:135-142. Zeh, D. W., J. A. Zeh & G. Tavakilian. 1992. Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the harlequin beetle Acrocinus longimanus. Biotropica, 24:86-96. Manuscript received February 1991, revised April 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:52-57 NEW SPECIES OF CRAB SPIDERS FROM BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR (ARANEAE: THOMISIDAE) Maria-Luisa Jimenez: Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas de Baja California Sur, A. C., Apdo. Postal 128, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico ABSTRACT: Three new species of the genera Isaloides, Misumenoides and Tmarus from the Cape Region, Baja California Sur, are described and illustrated. Only two species of spiders from the Americas are included in the genus Isaloides F. Pickard- Cambridge: Isaloides puta (F. O. Pickard-Cam- bridge 1890) from Mexico and Panama and I. toussainti Banks 1903 from Cuba and Haiti (F. O. Pickard-Cambridge 1903; Brignoli 1983 and Bonnet 1957). Spiders of this genus are typically six mm in total length and with a carapace longer than wide and flattened. The eyes are arranged in two trans- verse and recurved rows with the anterior row shorter; the lateral eyes are larger than the me- dian eyes and are seated on separate tubercles. The legs are generally short, pale brown, rather thick, and very strong without scopulae. Legs I and II are longer than III and IV. The tarsi have two claws and claw tufts. The opisthosoma is rather angular, longer than wide, and with four or five pairs of circular red spots. The palpal tibia of the male is without both retrolateral or ventral apophyses, and the tegulum is flattened. The em- bolus is long, slender and curled. The epigynum of the female is with a wide excavated atrium and without median septum or hood. The sper- mathecae are small, varying in the shape ac- cording to the species. Twenty seven species of the genus Misume- noides F.O. Pickard-Cambridge 1 900 have been described worldwide (Brignoli 1983, Bonnet 1957), of which four occur in North America: Misumenoides fonnosipes (Walckenaer) from Canada and United States, M. parva (Keyserling 1880) from Mexico, Panama and Colombia, M. aleatoria (Hentz 1847) from United States and Canada, and M. annulipes (O.P. Cambridge 1891) from Mexico, Guatemala and United States. Members of this genus have large, flattened bodies of 2.50-1 1.30 mm total length. The ca- parace is low, smooth and convex, the body is pale green and white along the lateral margins, with red markings in the opisthosoma; several erect setae and a white transverse carina are found on the clipeus. The eyes are arranged in two transverse recurved white rows, with the poste- rior row more curved than the anterior row. The lateral eyes are larger than the median eyes and are seated on large conjoined tubercles. Legs I and II are much longer and thicker than legs III and IV. They are creamy white and have no spots or bands, scopulae or claw tufts. They have a pair of ventral macrosetae, and the tarsi have with two claws. The opisthosoma is broad and flat, off-white to yellow in color and lacking erect setae. The palpal tibia of the male has an elab- orate retrolateral apophyses, and a shorter sim- pler ventral apophysis. The embolous is short, spur-like, and arising near the distal end of te- gulum. The epigynum of the female is nearly sclerotized with a shallow atrium and a broad hood. The spermathecae are broader than long (Dondale & Redner 1978). These spiders usually sit between petals and stamens of blossoms, where they ambush polli- nating insects of considerable size. The genus Tmarus Simon 1875 has a wide distribution with approximately 150 described species worldwide (Bonnet 1959; Brignoli 1983). Eight species of this genus are known from Mex- ico (Jimenez 1987). Members of this genus are recognized by their strong, dark brown dorsally, rather convex carapace that is larger than wide and conspicuously developed anteriad. The eyes are in two transverse recurved rows. The lateral eyes are longer than the median eyes and are seated on large separate tubercles. The legs are long with black spots, and no scopulae or claw tufts. The tarsi have two claws. Legs I and II are longer than III and IV. The opisthosoma is an- gular at the lateral margins, longer than wide, with a conspicuous dorsal tubercle at the pos- 52 JIMENEZ-NEW SPECIES OF CRAB SPIDERS tenor end. It is mottled and dull in color. The palpal tibia of the male has both ventral and retrolateral apophyses. The embolus is broad, the epigynum is lightly sclerotized, with a small hood. The spermathecae are longer than wide, with sur- face grooves (Gertsch 1939; Dondale & Redner 1978). Isaloides yollotl, new species (Figs. 1-4) Types. — Male holotype from low deciduous forest in Santiago, Baja California Sur, (13 Au- gust 1989, F. Cota). The following paratypes are from the type locality; six females and eight males (13 August 1989, F. Cota). Type and one female paratype will be deposited at the Collection of the Acarology Laboratory, Fac. de Ciencias Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, with the exception of 1 3 paratypes which will be deposited in the Arachnoiogical Collection of the Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas de Baja California Sur, A.C. Etymology.— The specific name is derivated from the Nahuatl word “yollotl” which means “heart”. This is suggested by the epigynum shape. Diagnosis.— Members of Isaloides yollotl n. sp. resemble I. puta (O. P. Cambridge) in coloration and body shape, but can be separated from those of the other known similar species by the em- bolus where the tip rests on a groove at the distal edge of the bulb. Epigynum of the female has a broader atrium and the spermathecae shape is diagnostic. Males.— Total length 3.80-4.85 mm, prosoma 1 .70-2. 1 5 mm long and 1 .60-2.00 mm wide (nine specimens). Femur II 2.75-3.50 mm. Carapace pale redish yellow, flattened, higher at level of coxa III, with few white clavate setae; ocular area darker. Anterior region of carapace with darker radiating lines and a pale median area, with edges somewhat dark. Eyes on small gray tubercles and arranged in two transverse rows, anterior more procurved than posterior; anterior median eyes separated one diameter between them; anterior lateral eyes bigger and red, separated 2.5 diam- eters of one anterior median eye. Chelicerae with two small teeth on both promargin and retro- margin. Legs with sparse scopula and claw tufts; patella and distal part of tibia and tarsus darker. Femur I 3.10-3.55 mm, dark yellow with three dorsal macrosetae, five prolateral, four retrola- teral and two or three small ventral macrosetae; tibia I 2.50-3.00 mm, with two dorsal macro- setae, three prolateral, three retrolateral and no 53 ventral. Basitarsus I 2.55-2.80 mm, with three prolateral macrosetae, three retrolateral and three pairs of ventral macrosetae. Tibia III 0.95-1.10 mm, with two dorsal macrosetae, two prolateral, two retrolateral and three ventral pairs. Opis- thosoma slender, cleft mid-line, pale yellow, dor- sally with a median dark band and five pairs of red circular spots on lateral light bands; sides pale, with grooves and dark setae; venter pale and with a light spot in half-moon shape on each side; spinnerets reddish yellow, lighter at tip. Tibia of the palpus as long as wide without ventral or retrolateral apophyses. Embolus long, slender and curled, with the tip resting on an anterior distal groove of the bulb; pars pendula terminating at approximately 270° of bulb, with prolateral edge strongly sclerotized (Figs. 1 , 2). Female.— Total length 5.65-6.15 mm, pro- soma 2.30-2.85 mm long and 2.05-2.50 mm wide (six specimens). Shape and color similar to the male, but with the body much paler. Femur II 3.05-3.40 mm long. Femur I 3.00-3.35 mm, with two dorsal macrosetae, four prolateral, four retrolateral, none ventral. Tibia I 2.50-2.85 mm, with two dorsal macrosetae, three prolateral, three retrolateral, four ventral pairs. Basitarsus I 2.00- 2.25 mm, with no dorsal macrosetae, three pro- lateral, three retrolateral and three ventral pairs. Tibia III 0.90-1.25 mm, with two dorsal macro- setae, two prolateral, three retrolateral and three ventral pairs. Epigynum heart shaped, as long as wide, with broad atrium and conspicuous cop- ulatory openings; spermathecae small, and light- ly curled; copulatory tubes wide and short (Figs. 3, 4). Range. — Known only from the type locality. Misumenoides quetzaltocatl, new species (Figs. 5-8) Types.— Male holotype from xeric shrub El Comitan, 28 September 1987 (M. Vazquez). Along with the following paratypes; four males and three females, 7 October 1987 (F. Cota and M. Jimenez), 7 October 1986 (M. Jimenez), 17 September 1987 (A. Cota), all from the type lo- cality; Sierra de la Laguna, La Zorra canion, low deciduous forest, 1 October 1987 (M. Jimenez); Santiago, (13 August 1989 (A. Cota). The type and one female paratype are deposited at the Collection of the Acarology Laboratory, Facul- tad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Auton- oma de Mexico, and six paratypes, which are deposited at the Arachnoiogical Collection of the 54 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY view; 4. Epigynum, dorsal view. Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas de Baja California Sur, A.C. Etymology.— The specific name is derived from the Nahuatl word “quetzalli” which means “green and beautiful plumage” and “tocatl” which means “spider”. The name denotes the green coloration of this species. Diagnosis.— quetzaltocatl n. sp. is most similar to M. parvus (Keyserling), but differs from the latter in having the male palpus smaller and the retrolateral apophysis without a distal notch; the spermathecae of the female are not round and the copulatory tubes originate dis- tally. Figures 5-8. — Misumenoides quetzaltocatl nov. sp.; 5. Palpus, ventral view; 6. Palpus, lateral view; 7. Epi- gynum, ventral view; 8. Epigynum, dorsal view. JIMENEZ-NEW SPECIES OF CRAB SPIDERS Males.— Total length 2.57-2.67 mm, prosoma 1.15-1.25 mm long, and 1.27-1.47 mm wide (five specimens). Femur II 1.50-1.90 mm. Car- apace low, greenish orange, highest at level of coxae III, with sparse setae, and with a white transverse carina on front. Anterior region of caparace light with white edges; ocular area pale. Eyes in two transverse curved rows, anterior row more recurved than posterior row; lateral eyes seated on conjoined white tubercles; anterior me- dian eyes separated by three times the diameter; anterolateral eyes larger and separated from me- dian eyes by one and a half the eye diameter. Chelicerae reddish brown and without teeth on either margin. Sternum dark yellow. Legs I and II much longer and thicker than legs III and IV, dark brown and strongly sclerotized, with sparse scopula and with dorsal granulations, except on the basitarsi and tarsi. Coxa and trochanter I and II dorsally pale; legs III and IV pale yellow; joints of the patella, tibia and femur II and IV with white rings; femur I 1.50-1.92 mm, with four dorsal macrosetae; tibia I 1.10-1.37 mm, with two or three pairs of ventral macrosetae. Basi- tarsus I 1.00-1.27 mm, with one prolateral mac- roseta; one retrolateral, four or five ventral ma- crosetae. Tibia III 0.45-0.50 mm, with no macrosetae; trochanter IV with a shallow notch. Dorsum of opisthosoma dark yellow, and broad, with small sparse setae, with five dark spots; sides dark; venter pale with a greenish spot at median region; epigastric region dark yellow. Tibia of palpus somewhat wider than long, with a long retrolateral apophyses without notch (Fig. 5) ; ventral apophysis short and slender; embo- lus short curved, arising distally on tegulum (Fig. 6) . Female.— Total length 5.00-6.75 mm, proso- ma 2.25-3.00 mm long and 2.37-2.90 mm wide (three specimens). Shape and color similar to the male but with the following exceptions: carapace green with a white spot on anterior region; ocular area with a dorsal median white line; sternum pale; legs with white segments. Femur I 2.65- 3.35 mm with a dorsal macrosetae and three prolateral macrosetae. Femur II 2.75-3.25 mm. Tibia I 1.95-2.25 mm, with three ventral ma- crosetae. Basitarsus 1 1 .62-2.00 mm with 10 ven- tral macrosetae. Tibia III 0.75-1.00 mm, with no macrosetae. Dorsum of opisthosoma whitish, with sides darker, venter pale, with median green spot. Epigynum wider than long with a shallow atrium and with small hood; copulatory openings located at median part (Fig. 7); copulatory tubes 55 short, rather thick; spermathecae longer than wide (Fig. 8). Range. — Known only from the type and lo- cality of Sierra de La Laguna. Tmams ehecatltocatl, new species (Figs. 9-12) Types. — Male holotype from xerich shrub El Comitan, Baja California Sur, 15 August 1986 (M. Jimenez and F. Cota) and three females and three males [15 August 1986, 17 September 1987], Sierra de la Laguna, Baja California Sur; low deciduous forest, 5 October 1 986, 3 Novem- ber 1987 (M. Jimenez, A. Acevedo and A. Cota). The type and one female paratype will be de- posited at the Collection of the Acarology Lab- oratory, Fac. de Ciencias Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. Seven paratypes are de- posited at the Arachnological Collection of the Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas de Baja California Sur, A. C. Etymology.— The specific name is a com- pound Nahuatl word “ehecatltocatl” which means “spider of the wind”. Diagnosis. — rrnarws ehecatltocatl n. sp. most resembles T. minutus Banks in structure but dif- fers from that species in having the palpus of the male with the ventral apophysis bifurcated, the retrolateral apophysis ending in a bent tip, and the embolus longer and thinner and the tegulum with a median spur. Males.— Total length 2.97-3.55 mm, caparace 1.07-1.42 mm long and 1.07-1.14 mm wide (four specimens). Femur II 2.07-2.80 mm. Carapace reddish brown anteriorly region with whitish ra- diating lines and scattered black spots and lighter areas; sides with reticular pigment, with macro- setae arranged in three longitudinal rows. Eyes on gray whitish tubercles; posterior median eyes surrounded with small setae; front white, almost horizontal. Chelicerae white, with sparse macro- setae and without teeth on either margin. Ster- num pale yellow with black spots. Legs pale yel- low, with dark rings at distal part of basitarsus I and 11. Legs III and IV paler and with sparse scopula; ventral region of femur, patella and tibia without dark spots. Femur I 2. 1 2-2.87 mm, with two dorsal macrosetae, three retrolateral and two prolateral. Tibia I 1.80-2.45 mm, with a dorsal macrosetae, three prolateral, three retrolateral, five ventral. Basitarsus 1 1 .60-2. 1 7 mm, with two retrolateral macrosetae, two or three prolateral and five ventral. Tibia III 0.77-1.10 mm, with two dorsal macrosetae. Dorsum of opisthosoma 56 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 9-\2. — Tmarus ehecatltocatl nov. sp.: 9. Palpus, ventral view; 10. Palpus, lateral view; 1 1. Epigynum, ventral view; 12. Epigynum, dorsal view. gray brown, with sparse setae arising on small tubercles, with a pale longitudinal stripe; sides with a black discontinuous band; venter pale; epigastrium with a pale stripe and a median dark spot and a pale band in each side; distal segment of spinnerets with numerous dark setae. Tibia of the palpus appoximately as long as wide, with a bicuspid ventral apophyses, left cusp wider and bigger, the right cusp smaller and truncated; re- trolateral apohyses short and ending in a lateral tip; tegulum with one median spur; embolus rather short and thin, with tip lightly curved in lateral view (Figs. 9, 10). Female.— Total length 3.45-6.05 mm, proso- ma 1 .25-1 .50 mm long and 1 .37-1 .50 mm wide. General structure and color essentially as in male (five specimens). Femur I 1.87-2.22 mm, with one or two dorsal macrosteae, two prolateral, three or four retrolateral. Femur II 1.87-2.30 mm. Tibia I 1 .47-1.67 mm, with two dorsal ma- crosetae, three prolateral, two or three retrola- teral, three vental. Basitarsus I 1.22-1.47 mm, with two retrolateral macrosetae, eight ventral. Tibia III 0.80-1.10 mm, with one dorsal macro- setae, one prolateral and one retrolateral. Epi- gynum round, somewhat sclerotized and without hood, with anterior oval depression bounded by setae (Fig. 1 1). Spermathecae longer than wide and half-moon shaped, with series of shallow transverse surface grooves (Fig. 12). Range. — Known from the type locality and Si- erra de la Laguna. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my gratitude to Dr. C. D. Dondale of the Biosystematics Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada for confirmating the new species and also for his valuable comments on the manu- script, to Dr. Anita Hoffmann for her review and suggestions regarding this work and to Mr. Fran- co Cota for his help in the collection of the spec- imens. This work was supported by grants from the Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas de Baja California Sur, A.C., the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT), the Secretar- ia de Programacion y Presupuesto (SPP) and the World Wild Life Fund (WWF). LITERATURE CITED Bonnet, P. 1959. Bibliographia Araneorum. Tou- louse, 2:1-5058. Brignoli, P. M. 1983. A Catalogue of Araneae de- scribed between 1940 and 1981. Manchester Univ. Press. 755 pp. Dondale, C. D. & J. H. Redner. 1978. The Insects and Arachnids of Canada, Part 5, The crab spiders of Canada and Alaska (Araneae: Philodromidae and Thomisidae). Canada Dept. Agr. Pub. 1663. Otta- wa, Canada. 255 pp. Gertsch, W. J. 1939. A revision of the typical crab JIMENEZ-NEW SPECIES OF CRAB SPIDERS 57 spiders (Misumeninae) of America North of Mex- ico. Bull. American Mus. Nat. Hist., 76:277-422. Jimenez, M. L. 1987. Dos nuevas aranas cangrejo (Araneae, Thomisidae) de Mexico. J. Arachnol., 15: 395-399. Pickard-Cambridge, F. O. 1903. Arachnida Aranei' da. Biologia Centrali Americana, Vol. 2:89-192. Manuscript received April 1991, revised August 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:58-63 SUPERCOOLING AND ITS ECOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS IN COELOTES ATROPOS {ARANEAE, AGELENIDAE) Kefyn M. Catley': School of Biological Sciences, University College of Wales, Aberys- twyth, Dyfed, Wales, United Kingdom ABSTRACT. Field observations have shown Coelotes atropos to be winter-active and tolerant of a wide environmental gradient. This study suggests that low temperature tolerance is achieved by a combination of behavioral thermoregulation and physiological adaptation. It was found that the two populations studied, one living at 732 m elevation and the other at sea level, were not significantly different in their ability to supercool. However, a highly significant relationship between body weight and ability to supercool was demonstrated such that immature stages are far more tolerant of low temperatures than adults. Juvenile spiders were not only able to tolerate sub-zero temperatures, but also demonstrated an ability to cold acclimate. They were active in the supercooled state and capable of silk production at -5 °C. Mechanisms which may account for the loss of supercooling ability are discussed as well as the implications of such a change for habitat utilization and life cycle strategy. Poikilothermic arthropods living in northern temperate zones have evolved a variety of over- wintering strategies to maximize their fitness. Spiders can be considered a model group in the study of winter ecology (Schaefer 1977, 1987), showing a variety of strategies of tolerating tem- poral low temperature stress. Five basic life cycle patterns can be distinguished: 1) Eurychronous species that mature after two or more years and therefore overwinter in various developmental stages; 2) Stenochronous species that reproduce in spring or summer and overwinter as imma- tures, (Theridiidae, Salticidae and Lycosidae); 3) Stenochronous species that lay eggs in autumn and overwinter as spiderlings inside the egg case (Araneidae); 4) Stenochronous species that re- produce during winter (Linyphiidae); and 5) Di- plochronous species that reproduce both in spring and autumn and overwinter as adults. Coelotes atropos (Walckenaer), an agelenid spider, appears to be annual (type two), the main overwintering stage being the juvenile spider. During this period mortality due to low temper- ature must be minimized. Thus one would expect cryoprotectant synthesis, which facilitates su- percooling of tissues, to be strongly selected for in the juvenile spiders. Many passively overwin- tering insects accumulate polyhydric alcohols in their hemolymph (Kirchner & Kestler 1969; 'Present address: Department of Entomology, Com- stock Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 1 4853-0999 USA Kirchner 1973, 1987). However, the increased osmotic pressure resulting from high polyol con- centrations would require large scale physiolog- ical and biochemical changes, which may not be possible in a winter-active animal (Duman 1 977) such as Coelotes atropos. Another factor impli- cated in freezing point depression is thermal- hysteresis protein (THP); these have been shown to occur in insects (Husby & Zachariassen 1980) and spiders (Duman 1979; Aunaas et al.,1983). Two more important parameters to consider when determining freeze tolerance are the type of gut contents (the presence of ice nucleators) and the level of dehydration (Somme 1982; Za- chariassen 1982; Cannon & Block 1988). This study was undertaken primarily to establish the supercooling point (SCP) of Coelotes atropos, to test whether this would differ between popula- tions from two extremes of an altitudinal gra- dient, and to test the spiders’ ability to cold ac- climate. Further, I was interested to know whether adults were more or less cold tolerant than ju- venile spiders (this question has a bearing on the phenomenon of the dead mother being canni- balized by her overwintering spiderlings (Bris- towe 1954)). METHODS Study sites.— Two study sites were chosen for their degree of exposure to altitude (and therefore temperature) and wind effects. Both habitats had a plentiful supply of stones that were suitable for C. atropos retreats. The Plynlimon site, Dyfed, 58 CATLEY-SUPERCOOLING IN COELOTES ATROPOS 59 Wales UK: During January and February 1989, collections of spiders were made from rock scree on the summit of Plynlimon Fawr (National Grid Reference SN 789868) at an altitude of 752 m. Animals were taken from stones in unstable scree on the NW facing slopes and from more stable scree on the SE slope of the summit. Both hab- itats support a spider community which com- prises C. atropos, Robertus lividus (Blackwall), PoecUoneta globosa (Wider) and Centromerus prudens (O. P. -Cambridge). The Arth valley, Aberarth, Dyfed: During the same period animals were collected from the sheltered wooded valley of the River Arth (National Grid Reference SN 489625) at an altitude of 9.5 m, where stone- strewn slopes beneath Quercus petraea (Mat- tushka) Liebl. were found to support large pop- ulations of C. atropos. Supercooling point determination. —A Peltier unit (a thermopile) was set on a stage such that water cooled to 3 °C could circulate around a heat sink under the stage. In order to achieve sub-zero temperatures, it was necessary to cover the stage with an insulated cover. The freezing chamber consisted of two halves of an aluminum dish (45 mm diameter), the bottom half of which was in direct contact with the thermopile. Two thermocouples (Copper/Constantan) were used to record temperature, one connected to the chamber, the other to the spider’s prosoma, thus allowing simultaneous monitoring of the ani- mal’s body temperature and the temperature of the chamber. After collection, juvenile and adult female spiders were stored in 5 cm x 2 cm vials at 5 °C prior to being anesthetized with COj, weighed, and placed in the freezing chamber. The thermocouple was attached to the prosoma with correcting fluid; however, for four of the largest spiders it had to be attached with cellophane adhesive tape. Thermocouples were connected to Comark electronic thermometers, which in turn were linked to a Bryan 2700 chart recorder. Convention in low temperature experiments is to decrease body temperature by 1 "C min’' (Salt 1961). This was achieved by use of a variable power control to the Peltier unit, while moni- toring the falling temperature curve with a stop watch. Continual monitoring of the animal’s fall- ing body temperature enabled determination of the SCP exotherm, the sudden release of the la- tent heat of fusion when the animal freezes spon- taneously. Animals used in the cold acclimation experi- ment were placed in individual vials with small In (Weight) Figure 1. — Plot of supercooling points (SCP) against the natural logarithm of body weight (g): for adult (« = 18 [triangles]), and juvenile {n = 29 [squares]) C. atropos. Spiders were from both study sites. amounts of moss as substrate. These were sub- merged in a water bath containing ethylene glycol and run at — 5 °C to — 2 °C (mean = —3.5 °C) for 14 days. Light regimes were L. 10: D. 14, closely following the ambient L/D cycle. Since a period of 14 days was found to be adequate for the spider Clubiona to acclimate (Duman 1979), a similar time scale was adopted for C. atropos. Throughout the experiment no animal was fed, and none underwent ecdysis. A total of 93 ju- venile and 18 adult spiders were used for the statistical analyses using one-way ANOVA. Data from the samples shown in Fig. 1 were combined to test for differences in SCP between adults and juveniles. Tests to detect differences between the two populations of juveniles spiders were con- ducted on a separate sample {n = 31). Spiders used for the cold acclimation experiment were also from an independent sample {n = 33). RESULTS Supercooling experiments.— Fig. 1 shows a plot of SCP against the natural logarithm of body weight for animals from both Plynlimon and Arth sites. Adult spiders {n = 18) appear to have a much higher mean freezing point than juveniles (n = 29). Due to the paucity of adults at the 60 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 2. — Plot of supercooling points (SCP) against the natural logarithm of body weight (g): for adult (n = 13 [triangles]), and juvenile (« = 14 [squares]) C atropos. Spiders were from sea level, Arth site. Plynlimon site {n = 5), data from the Arth site (Fig. 2) were used to test for a difference in SCP between adults > 100 mg (rz = 13) and juveniles < 100 mg (« = 14). It proved to be highly sig- nificant (One-Way ANOVA; F,, 25, = 46.66, P < 0.001). Consequently, adults and juveniles were considered separately in population compari- sons. A further test showed there to be no significant difference between the SCP of the Plynlimon {n = 17) and Arth {n = 14) juvenile samples (One- Way ANOVA: F„,29, < 1, NS; Fig. 3). Therefore, ability to cold acclimate was tested using juve- niles from both populations. Cold acclimation to -3.5 °C for 14 days resulted in a significantly enhanced mean SCP. Cold acclimated animals mean SCP = — 6.1 °C, n = 33; whereas the mean SCP for field fresh animals = —4.4 °C, n = 39 (One-Way ANOVA: F,,,™) = 17.49, P < 0.001; Fig. 4). A test for an effect of location (Arth or Plynlimon) on ability to cold acclimate proved to be non-significant {P > 0.05). Two observations of interest made during the cold acclimation experiment related to the adults’ inability to survive sub-zero temperatures and to silk production by the juveniles. Three adult female spiders subjected to sub-freezing temper- atures (-3.5 °C) died after 24 hours exposure. All juvenile spiders {n = 33) not only survived for the duration of the experiment (14 days), but exhibited normal movements in the supercooled state; silk synthesis continued apparently unhin- dered and webs were fashioned on the substrate. Natural History Observations. — In Britain the -1 -2 -3 -4 “5 -6 -7 SCP°C Figure 3. — Frequency distribution histograms of su- percooling points (SCP) for juvenile spiders. A) Arth sample {n = 14). B) Plynlimon sample (n = 17). There was no significant difference between the populations in their ability to supercool body fluids. genus Coelotes contains two species; C. atropos and Coelotes terrestris (Wider). Whereas their distribution overlaps in southern counties, C. atropos is much more common in the North and West (Locket et al. 1974) where it is particularly associated with high ground. However, its range does not extend much into Scotland, even though it is able to tolerate extremes of climate associ- ated with mountain tops. While the C. atropos SCP°C Figure 4.— Frequency distribution histograms of su- percooling points (SCP) for juvenile C. atropos samples from both sites, juvenile spiders only. A) field fresh spiders {n = 39). B) spiders after 14 days acclimation at -3.5 “C (« = 33). CATLEY- SUPERCOOLING IN COELOTES ATROPOS 61 population from Plynlimon Fawr (752 m) was sampled during this study, the species has also been recorded from several other Welsh moun- tain habitats including Snowdon (> 920 m), Cader Idris (893 m), and the Brecon Beacons (887 m) (Bristowe 1938). C. atropos is cryptozoic, and the web, often in the form of a tube, is built under stones and logs. A collar surrounds the opening of the retreat, while the proximal end often bifurcates. Eggs are laid in June and spiderlings eclose after a month or so (Bristowe 1954). Petto (1990) reports that populations of C. terrestris in Germany are bi- ennial; mating occurs in the autumn and both juveniles and adult females overwinter. Bristowe (1954) states that in Britain C. atropos mates during spring or early summer suggesting an an- nual life-cycle; the loss of supercooling ability demonstrated to occur in adult female C. atropos is certainly consistent with such a strategy. After emergence the spiderlings remain together for a considerable period, often several months, dur- ing which time they are fed and guarded by the mother (Bristowe 1954). In casual observations of C. atropos web sites over several seasons, I have often observed dead adult females being consumed by their spiderlings. This has been ob- served by other authors (Bristowe 1954; Tretzel 1961) and should facilitate offspring survival un- til the spring. Whereas immature stages of C. atropos often feed on various stages of Collembola (pers. obs.), adults and sub-adults feed largely on Coleoptera (Bristowe 1954; Tretzel 1961). Prey remains (el- ytra) found in webs at the Plynlimon site indicate that adult C. atropos feed largely on the following predatory ground beetles: Family Carabidae, Ptetrosticus madius F., Carabus problematicus Herbst, Carabus arvensis Herbst, and Calathus melanocephalus'L.-, Family Elateridae, Ctenicera cuprea F. DISCUSSION Kirchner (1973) recognized three main cate- gories of spider SCP distributions which clearly reflect the animals’ overwintering microhabitat. These range from the low SCP of Theridion no- tatum (Clerck) (=Enoplognatha ovata (Clerck)) (mean = —26.1 °C) which overwinters in open vegetation, to the high SCP of Meta menardi (Latreille) (mean = — 4 °C) which lives in caves that are subject to little temperature fluctuation. A German population of Coelotes terrestris (also cryptozoic) was shown to have a mean SCP of -6.2 °C: this Kirchner placed in a medium-to- low category of cold tolerance. The equally high SCP (mean = —4.4 °C, n = 39) exhibited by C. atropos in this study appears to be consistent with its cryptozoic behavior. Ability to withstand the lowest winter tem- peratures that occur annually in a habitat will be strongly selected for. Consequently, geographical variation in supercooling ability and behavioral thermoregulation (or both) should be expected in populations with wide geographical or alti- tudinal ranges (Somme 1 982), and should be most strongly expressed in species that overwinter in exposed conditions. Whereas differences in su- percooling abilities have been detected between separate populations in other arthropod species (Macphee 1961;Hansen 1978), no significant dif- ference could be detected between the two pop- ulations of C. atropos with regard to their ability to supercool. Cryptozoic thermoregulatory be- havior seems to be a vital component in allowing C. atropos to utilize hostile environments (i.e., mountain summits). Perhaps the effectiveness of such behavior might explain why the species as a whole has such a high SCP, and why high el- evation populations have not evolved a lower SCP. Coelotes atropos responded to sub-zero temperature acclimation by enhancing its ability to supercool. Such cold acclimation has been shown to occur in many species of insects and mites (Schenker 1983; Cannon 1986; Cannon & Block 1988). However, Kirchner & Kullman (1975) showed that supercooling ability in the spiders Theridion sisyphium (Clerck) and T. im- pressum (L. Koch), both of which overwinter in unprotected vegetation, did not appear to be af- fected by warm or cold acclimation. Whereas the end products of cold acclimation, such as in- creased levels of glycerol and other cryoprotec- tants, are easily demonstrable in insects, the pre- cise ecophysiological mechanisms of acclimation are little understood. Indeed, only recently has a start been made to elucidate the neural basis of thermal reception and perception in spiders (Pulz 1986). Another factor implicated in freezing point de- pression is dehydration. Although the required degree of desiccation was probably not reached during the cold acclimation experiment reported here, it must be borne in mind as a possible contributory factor. Water loss can increase the solute concentration of the hemolymph, thus de- pressing freezing point, without necessarily re- quiring further cryoprotectant synthesis. Finally, 62 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY certain spiders have been shown to possess THP in their hemolymph (Duman 1 979; Husby & Za- chariassen 1980), and under natural conditions, THP production should be strongly selected for in a winter-active animal. The remarkable ability of all juvenile spiders (« = 33) to synthesize silk and construct webs on the frozen substrate during the cold accli- mation experiment warrants further study. Throughout the fourteen day period (at -3.5 "C) the animals exhibited normal coordinated move- ments, with no sign of chill coma. Such obser- vations are supported by Aitchison (1987) who observed winter-activity in juvenile spiders of several families in temperatures as low as -8 °C, and Hagvar (1973) who reported copulation In Bolyphantes index (Thorell) at sub-freezing tem- peratures. Whereas overwintering juvenile spi- ders may display both inhibition of ecdysis and low metabolic rates (Schaefer 1987), ability to move normally and produce silk at sub-freezing temperatures might confer selective advantage if it allowed food capture and consumption during periods when temperatures rose above 6 °C. C. atropos is capable of high food consumption at 8 °C and 10 °C but exhibits an arrested devel- opment at 6 °C (Aitchison 1981). If, as the evi- dence seems to suggest, C. atropos does consume food during the winter, it seems likely that THP will be synthesized in the midgut, thus prevent- ing inoculative freezing. However, there is some debate concerning the effectiveness of the filter- ing process as a method of removing ice nucle- ators during the feeding process in spiders in general and Kirchner (1987) has suggested that most nucleators may be removed by the process. Ramsey (1964) has shown THP to occur in the midgut of insects, but its occurrence in the mid- gut of spiders has yet to be shown. Loss of su- percooling ability in adult females may result from physiological changes associated with oo- genesis, or if THP is involved, its synthesis may be mediated by the presence of juvenile hormone (JH). THP regulation by JH does occur in certain insects (Horwath & Duman 1983; Hamilton et al. 1986), and recent evidence (Carrel et al. in press), has shown for the first time that spiders do utilize JH to regulate development. The pre- cise mechanism notwithstanding, loss of cold tol- erance after maturity should result in strong se- lection pressure towards an annual life cycle. In Argyroneta aquatica (Clerck) (Bromhall, 1988) and in some lycosids (Schaefer 1977), where overwintering occurs in both adult and juvenile stages, no loss of supercooling ability occurs dur- ing either stage. Conversely, Kirchner & Kull- man (1975) found that supercooling ability in Theridion spp. where overwintering occurs mainly in the juvenile stages, did, as in C. atro- pos, vary with age. Ontogenetic loss of supercooling ability in C. atropos combined with temporal and spatial cli- matic fluctuations may result in a change of life cycle strategy. At the Plynlimon site only five adult females were encountered during a total of four collecting trips (cf juveniles n = 37), whereas at the Arth site, presumably as a consequence of temperature amelioration by the nearby sea, adult females were plentiful throughout the sample pe- riod (during January and February 1988, tem- peratures at the Arth site fell below freezing on only 9 occasions, reaching a low of — 2.2 °C, with a mean of - 1 . 1 °C for those days when the tem- perature fell below zero). If there are severe low temperatures early in the winter, a female may die and be digested by (and thereby contribute to the survivorship of) her spiderlings. If, how- ever, the winter is unusually mild (as during the period of the study 1988-1989), then adult fe- males are able to survive and possibly reproduce for a second time the following spring. Such a strategy together with cannibalism of the dead mother by her overwintering spiderlings, provide the animal with a “bet hedging” system well able to contend with most climatic eventualities. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank the Nature Conservancy Council for permission to collect specimens at the study sites, both of which are Sites of Special Scientific In- terest. My grateful thanks to Dr. Mike Ireland, Dr. John Gee and Phil Lloyd, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth for help and support, to Adrian Fowles (NCC) for identifying the beetle remains, and to John Dingly and Cynon Jones for their help in the field. Dr. G. Sumner, St. David’s University College, Lampeter supplied weather data. Dr. Frederick Coyle, Dr. J. E. Car- rel and Dr. C. W. Aitchison provided construc- tive criticism of the manuscript. Finally, I thank my wife Diana for her fortitude and encourage- ment. This research was carried out in partial fulfillment of the degree of B.Sc. at UCW Aber- ystwyth, Wales. LITERATURE CITED Aitchison, C. W. 1981. Feeding and growth of Coc- lotes atropos (Araneae, Agelenidae) at low temper- atures. J. Arachnol., 9:327-330. CATLEY-SUPERCOOLING IN COELOTES ATROPOS 63 Aitchison, C. W. 1987. Feeding ecology of winter- active spiders. Pp. 264-273. In Ecophysiology of Spiders. (W. Nantwig, ed.) Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Aunaas, T., J. G. Baust & K. E. Zachariassen. 1983. Ecological studies on arthropods from Spitsbergen. Polar Research 1 (N.S.):235-240. Bristowe, W. S. 1938. The Comity of Spiders. Ray Society, London. Bristowe, W. S. 1954. The World of Spiders. Collins, London. Bromhall, C. 1988. Argyroneta aquatica (Clerck) overwinter behaviour and supercooling point. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 7:225-228. Carrel, J. E., J. K. Atkinson & G. D. Prestwich. in press. Juvenile hormone binding protein in spider hemolymph. American Arachnol. (abstract) Cannon, R. J. C. 1986. Diet and acclimation effects on the cold tolerance and survival of an Antarctic springtail. British Antarctic Surv. Bull., 71:19-30. Cannon, R. J. C. & W. Block. 1988. Cold tolerance of microarthropods. Biol. Rev., 63:23-77. Duman, J. G. 1977. The role of macromolecular an- tifreeze in the darkling beetle Meracantha contractu. J. Comp. Physiol., 1 15:279-286. Duman, J. G. 1979. Sub-zero temperature tolerance in spiders: the role of thermal-hysteresis factors. J. Comp. Physiol., 131:347-352. Hagvar, S. 1973. Ecological studies on a winter-active spider Bolyphantes index (Thorell) (Araneida, Lin- yphiidae). Norsk Entomol. Tidsskr., 20:309-314. Hamilton, M. D., R. R. Rojas, & J. G. Buast. 1986. Juvenile hormone modulation of cryoprotectant synthesis in Eurosta solidaginis by a component of the endocrine system. J. Insect Physiol., 32:971- 979. Hanson, T. 1978. On seasonal changes in the glycerol content of two different populations of Apatele psi L. Esti NSV Tead. Akad. Toim. Biol., 27:302-305. Horwath, K. L. & J. G. Duman. 1983. Induction of antifreeze protein production by juvenile hormone in larvae of the beetle Dendroides canadensis. J. Comp. Physiol. B Biochem. Syst. Environ. Physi- ol.,l 5 1:233-240. Husby, J. A. & K. E. Zachariassen. 1980. Antifreeze agents in the body fluid of winter active insects and spiders. Experentia, 34:963-964. Kirchner, W. 1973. Ecological aspects of cold toler- ance in spiders (a comparative studyj.Pp. 271-279. In Effects of Temperature on Ectothermic Organ- isms: Ecological Implications and Mechanisms of Compensation. (W. Wieser, ed.) Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. Kirchner, W. 1987. Behavioral and physiological ad- aptations to cold. Pp. 66-77. In Ecophysiology of Spiders. (W. Nantwig, ed.) Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Kirchner, W. & P. Kestler. 1969. Untersuchungen zur Kalteresistenz der Schilfradspinne Araneus co- mutus (Araneidae). J. Insect Physiol., 15:41-53. Kirchner, W. & E. Kullman. 1975. Uberwinterung und Kalteresistenz der Haubennetzspinnerarten Theridion impressum (L. Koch) und Theridion sis- yphium (Clerck) (Araneae, Theridiidae). Dechen- iana, 127:241-250. Locket, G. H., A. F. Millidge & P. Merrett. 1974. British Spiders, vol. 3. Ray Society, London. Macphee, A. W. 1961. Mortality of winter eggs of the European red mite Panonychus ulmi (Koch), at low temperatures and its ecological significance. Ca- nadian J. ZooL, 39:229-243. Petto, R. 1990. Abundance and prey of Coe/o/c5 ter- restris (Wider) (Araneae, Agelenidae) in hedges. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 8:185-193. Pultz, R. 1986. Temperature related behavior and temperature perception in spiders. Pp. 41-48. In Thermal Relations in Animals and Man. Biona rep. 4, Akad. Wiss. Mainz Fisher, Stuttgart. Ramsey, J. A. 1964. The rectal complex of the meal- worm, Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera, Tenebri- onidae). Philos. Trans. Soc. London B Biol. Sci., 248:279-314. Salt, R. W. 1961. Principles of insect cold-hardiness. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 6: 55-73. Schaefer, M. 1977. Winter ecology of spiders (Ara- neida). Z. Angew. Ent., 8: 1 13-134. Schaefer, M. 1987. Life cycles and diapause. Pp. 331- 347. In Ecophysiology of Spiders. (W. Nantwig, ed.) Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Schenker, R. 1983. Effects of temperature acclima- tion on cold-hardiness of alpine microarthropods. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol., 20:37-47. Somme, L. 1982. Supercooling and winter survival in terrestrial arthropods. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 73A:5 19-543. Tretzel, E. 1961. Biologic, Okologie und Brutpflege von Coelotes terrestris (Wider) (Araneae, Ageleni- dae), Teil II: Brutpfleg. Z. Morph. Okol., Tiere 50: 375-542. Zachariassen, K. E. 1982. Nucleating agents in cold- hardy insects. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 73A: 557- 562. Manuscript received January 1991, revised October 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:64-66 RESEARCH NOTES PARASITISM OF PSEUDOSCORPIONS (ARACHNIDA) BY MERMITHIDAE (NEMATODA) Records of nematode parasites of pseudoscor- pions are rare and consist of brief reports by Vachon (1949) and Harvey (1982) who cite un- identified mermithids in European and Austra- lian pseudoscorpions, respectively. Although Vachon mentioned that the nematodes he re- covered appeared to resemble juveniles of the genus Hexamermis, it is not possible to base a reliable generic determination on immature mer- mithids. During a study on the life history and teratology of pseudoscorpions in the Balkan re- gion (Curcic et al. 1991), one of us (B. P. M. C.) came across specimens containing nematodes. The present paper reports these finds and sum- marizes our knowledge of nematode-pseudo- scorpion associations. Samples of infected pseudoscorpions were ob- tained by sifting through leaf litter and humus over a period from April 1 989 to September 1 990 in a mixed oak forest in the village of Obrez, near Belgrade, Serbia, Yugoslavia. Six females and three males of Roncus aff. lubricus L. Koch (Neo- bisiidae) from a total of2167 adults (1335 males and 832 females) were infected with represen- tatives of the family Mermithidae of the order Mermithida (Fig. 1). This results in an overall infection rate of 0.4% for the adults, with a 0.2% infection rate for males and a 0.7% infection rate for females. Two specimens of Neobisium carpaticum Beier collected from Mt. Avala near Belgrade were also associated with nematodes. The first specimen, a deutonymph, had a small, coiled nematode (length = 349 Mm; width = 22 Mm) in the pedi- palpal femur (Fig. 2). This may represent an early developmental stage of a mermithid nematode, although further growth would be restricted in this region of the host. The second specimen was a “dauer” stage of a representative of the order Rhabditida attached by its head to an abdominal sclerite of a mature female host. The specimen was 567 Mm long and 38 Mm wide and repre- sented a third stage juvenile enclosed in its sec- ond stage cuticle. Such phoretic associations be- tween soil arthropods and rhabditoid nematodes are not uncommon. Three mermithid-parasitized individuals of Roncus aff. lubricus were dissected and the nem- atodes removed. In all three hosts, the internal tissues, including the gonads, were atrophied and the body cavity was completely occupied by the parasites (Fig. 1). Two of the three hosts con- tained two parasites each while the third con- tained a single mermithid. Often, when two mer- mithids are present in a host, one is a female and the other is a male (Poinar, pers. obs.). Such a ratio favors reproductive activity and continu- ation of the life cycle. Nematodes removed from parasitized Roncus aff. lubricus were cream colored and ranged in length from 4.8 to 6.6 mm {x = 5.7; n = 5). The greatest body width ranged from 164 to 189 Mm; {x = 178 Mm; n = 5). Four of the mermithids were in their late parasitic stage and the cuticle had thickened in preparation for the following free-living post-parasitic stage. In these individ- uals a prominent cuticular appendage was pres- ent, ranging from 31-44 Mm in length {x 40 Mm; n = 4). The fifth mermithid was still in the middle of its parasitic stage and did not yet possess an appendage. In all specimens, both anterior and posterior ends were rounded and six faint head papillae could be detected. Cuticular cross fibers were not evident. The trophosome extended an- teriorly into the head region and posteriorly into the tail region. It is likely that these parasites belong to a new species and possibly genus. How- ever, descriptions of mermithids should be based on adult characters which are still unavailable to us. Mermithid nematodes parasitize a wide vari- ety of terrestrial invertebrates. Among the Arachnida, they have been reported from spiders and harvestmen (Poinar 1985) (Poinar & Early 1990) and scorpions (Poinar & Stockwell 1988) as well as pseudoscorpions. Of the two spider mermithids whose biology has been investigated, both were shown to have indirect cycles involv- ing spider predation on paratenic hosts contain- ing the infective stages of the mermithids (Poinar & Benton 1 986) (Poinar & Early 1 990). This type of cycle may be widespread in predaceous hosts 64 RESEARCH NOTES 65 Figures 1, 2. — 1, Two parasitic mermithid nematodes filling the body cavity of a pseudoscorpion, Roncus aff. lubricus. Bar = 540 nm. 2, A coiled unidentified nematode in the pedipalpal femur of a deutonymph of Neobisium carpaticum. Bar = 36 fim. and may occur in the present case with the pseu- doscorpion mermithids. With spiders, the par- atenic hosts are often aquatic detritivores such as the immature stages of Trichoptera and Ephemeroptera. When mature and ready to emerge, the nematodes apparently drive the par- asitized hosts to a water source; the mermithids then exit the hosts. After maturation to the adult stage, mating and oviposition occur. Immature insects ingest the nematode eggs, which hatch in their alimentary tracts. The newly emerged in- fective stage mermithids penetrate the paratenic host’s gut wall and enter the hemocoel where they remain until being ingested by a spider. It was not possible to determine whether the life cycle of the pseudoscorpion mermithid is 66 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY indirect, involving a paratenic host, or direct with the adult stages in the same environment as the host. Neither Vachon (1949) nor Harvey (1982) commented on this point and their short reports provide little more than the establishment of mermithids in the body cavities of pseudoscor- pions. However, Vachon did mention that the ovary of the parasitized female was atrophied, similar to the conditions found in the present study. Literature Cited Curcic, B. P. M., R. N. Dimitrijevic, O. S. Karamata & L. R. Lucic. 1991. Segmental anomalies in Ron- cus alf. lubricus L. Koch, 1873 (Neobisiidae, Pseu- doscorpiones) from Yugoslavia. J. ArachnoL, 19: 000-000. Harvey, M. S. 1982. A parasitic nematode (Mermi- thidae) from the pseudoscorpion “Sternophorus'’’ hirsti Chamberlin (Stemophoridae). J. Arachnol., 10:192. Poinar, Jr., G. O. 1985. Nematode parasitism of spi- ders and harvestmen. J. Arachnol., 13:121-128. Poinar, Jr., G. O. & C. L. B. Benton, Jr. 1986. Ar- animermis aptispicula n. g., n. sp. (Mermithidae: Nematoda), a parasite of spiders (Arachnida: Ara- neida). Systematic ParasitoL, 8:33-38. Poinar, Jr., G. O. & S. A. Stockwell. 1988. A new record of a nematode parasite (Mermithidae) of a scorpion. Revue d’NematoL, 1 1:316-364. Poinar, Jr., G. O. & J. W. Early. 1990. Aranimermis giganteus n. sp. (Mermithidae: Nematoda), a par- asite of New Zealand mygalomorph spiders (Ara- neae: Arachnida). Revue d’NematoL, 13:403-410. Vachon, M. 1949. Ordre des Pseudoscorpions. Pp.431-481. In: Traite de Zoologie (Grasse, P.-P., ed.) Vol. VI. Masson, Paris. George O. Poinar, Jr. and Bozidar P. M. Curcic: Department of Entomology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA; and Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Studentski Trg 16, YU- 11000 Beograd, Yu- goslavia. Manuscript received July 1991, revised September 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:67-68 CONJECTURES ON THE ORIGINS AND FUNCTIONS OF A BRIDAL VEIL SPUN BY THE MALES OF CUPIENNIUS COCCINEUS (ARANEAE, CTENIDAE) Bristowe (1958) called the tiny web spun by courting males of Xysticus cristatus (Araneae, Thomisidae) over and around the female while circling upon her a bridal veil. To my knowledge, similar behavior of males has been reported for Nephila davipes (Araneidae, Nephilidae; Rob- inson & Robinson 1973, 1980), for Latrodectus trededmguttatus (Araneidae, Theridiidae; Stem «fe Kullmann 1981), for Tibellus oblongus (Ara- neae, Philodromidae; Stem & Kullmann 1981), ^ov Ancylometes bogotensis (Araneae, Pisauridae; Merrett 1988) and for Dictyna volucripes (Ara- neae, Dictynidae; Starr 1988). In these species, the male places a few threads over the female. In Pisaurina mira (Araneae, Pisauridae), the fe- male draws her legs I and II against her carapace (in a flexed position) and the male wraps them with a veil of silk prior to copulation (Bmce & Carico 1988). Spiders of the neotropical genus Cupiennius live in close association with particular plants, mainly bromeliads, on which they receive vi- brations (e.g., from prey and mating partner) and emit vibratory signals during courtship (Barth et al. 1988). In a recent behavioral study of species recognition and species isolation, we compared hetero- and intraspecific communication in three closely related species of the genus Cupiennius (Barth & Schmitt 1991, Schmitt et al. 1990). In 9 out of 14 trials, the females of C. salei (which are larger by about 30% than those of C coed- neus) responded to the vibratory courtship of C. coccineus males with their own vibratory court- ship signals and both spiders finally met. When mounting the female, three of the 9 males spun attachment points onto the female’s legs and cir- cled upon her for minutes while depositing silk on her. The males inteirupted this behavior to emit vibratory courtship signals. Whereas two males copulated after a few minutes, the third made increasingly longer excursions on the bro- meliad consistently returning to the female and continuing both his spinning behavior and vi- bratory courtship. Finally, about two hours after the first contact between the heterospecifics, he was attacked and killed by the female when re- turning to her. Obviously, the male silk did not seriously affect the female’s mobility. In Cupiennius, females are known to use silk as draglines, to wrap and tie large prey (e.g., grass- hoppers) to the substratum, to construct irregular sheet webs partly or totally closing their retreats, to build egg sacs and loose and irregular “nursery webs” for the newly hatched spiderlings. Males use silk as draglines, to build sperm webs, and to immobilize large prey. During many years of experience in breeding spiders of the genus Cu- piennius, we never observed the behavior de- scribed above for C. coccineus males. I suggest four interpretations, which are not mutually ex- clusive. (i) The male’s spinning is the same be- havior as that shown when tying large prey to the substratum. The male switches from court- ship to predatory behavior and vice versa be- cause the heterospecific female has attributes of both mate and prey, (ii) The observed behavior is a displacement activity. A heterospecific fe- male that has attributes of mate and non-mate and prey raises conflicts in the male. The kind of displacement activity that arises (here: tying of prey) is a matter of chance or of prevailing attributes of the female, (iii) Bridal veiling is part of the male’s repertoire which he uses only when confronted with a particularly large and poten- tially dangerous female. About 15% of the fe- males responding to males during vibratory courtship attack the approaching male, and males smaller than females are at risk of being killed by the female. Knowing this, we use pairs matched in size for breeding. Thus bridal veiling could never have been observed in conspecific pairs of C. coccineus in our lab. (iv) Bridal veiling is an atavism. Males regress to a behavior inherited from, e. g., a pisaurid ancestor when confronted with a particularly large and potentially danger- ous female. The behavior has never been ob- served in conspecific pairs for the same reason as given in (iii). With the knowledge I have on Cupiennius, 1 cannot refute any of the above con- jectures. The above hypotheses are nevertheless testable. For example, one can compare films of males tying prey to the substratum with films of 67 68 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY males spinning a bridal veil (hypothesis i) or one can perform experiments using both female-larg- er and male-larger pairs of conspecifics, the pre- diction being to observe bridal veils with female- larger pairs and no veils with male-larger pairs (hypotheses iii and iv). Let us assume now that application of silk onto the female is part of the male’s courtship rep- ertoire in the species enumerated above. What functions does this behavior have? If the behav- ior of the male handicaps the female during cop- ulation or causes at least a brief delay of her activity after copulation, which seems to be the case in Pisaurina mira (Bruce & Carico 1988), then aggressive acts of the female and/or post- copulatory chases after the male (common in Cupiennius coccineus and Latrodectus tredecim- guttatus and present in Nephila clavipes', Chris- tenson et al. 1985) should be less efficient. In this view, the bridal veil “solution” is only purpose- ful in those spider species in which females are aggressive toward males during or after copula- tion. Hence the number of species in which the male applies silk to the female must depend on female behavior. The close phylogenetic rela- tionship of Ctenidae and Pisauridae on the one hand, and the large taxonomic distance of Thom- isidae and Dictynidae and Nephilidae and Ther- idiidae from each other and from the other two families (Homann 1975, Coddington 1990) on the other hand, suggest that silk binding of the female by the male has evolved separately sev- eral times. But in view of the potentially lethal weapons of spiders and of the fact that spiders need to overcome cannibalistic tendencies when mating, I wonder (as do Bruce & Carico 1988) why this behavior is not more widespread among male spiders. My answer is that aggressiveness of females towards males during or after (and even before) copulation is rare (Foelix 1982) or at least much less common than spider folklore says, which may explain why bridal veiling is so rare. Most spiders appease their mates before approaching them. The conjectures presented in this paragraph can be corroborated or refuted by investigating systematically the correlation be- tween female and male behavior (and size) in as many spider species as possible. Supported by grant P7896 from the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) to Friedrich G. Barth. LITERATURE CITED Barth, F. G., H. Bleckmann, J. Bohnenberger & E.-A. Seyfarth. 1988. Spiders of the genus Cupiennius Simon 1891 (Araneae, Ctenidae) II. On the vibra- tory environment of a wandering spider. Oecologia, 77:194-201. Barth, F. G. & A. Schmitt. 1991. Species recognition and species isolation in wandering spiders (Cupien- nius specc., Ctenidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 29: 333-339. Bristowe, W.S. 1958. The World of Spiders. Collins, London. Bruce, J. A. & J. E. Carico. 1988. Silk use during mating in Pisaurina mira (Araneae, Pisauridae). J. Arachnol., 16:1-4. Christenson, T. E., S. G. Brown, W. A. Wenzl, E. M. Hill & K. C. Goist. 1985. Mating behavior of the Golden-Orb-Weaving spider, Nephila clavipes: 1. Female receptivity and male courtship. J. Comp. Psychol., 99:160-166. Coddington, J. A. 1990. Cladistics and spider clas- sification: araneomorph phylogeny and the mono- phyly of orbweavers (Araneae, Araneomorphae; Or- biculariae). Acta Zool. Fennica, 190:75-88. Foelix, R. F. 1982. The Biology of Spiders. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass. Homann, H. 1975. Die Stellung der Thomisidae und der Philodromidae im System der Araneae (Cheli- cerata, Arachnida). Z. Morph. Tiere, 80:181-202. Merrett, P. 1988. Notes on the biology of the neo- tropical pisaurid, Ancylometes bogotensis (Araneae: Pisauridae). Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 7:197-201. Robinson, M. H. & B. Robinson. 1973. The stabi- limenta of Nephila clavipes and the origins of sta- bilimentum-building in araneids. Psyche, 80:277- 287. Robinson, M. H. & B. Robinson. 1980. Comparative studies of the courtship and mating behavior of tropical araneid spiders. Pacific Insects Monogr., 36: 5-271. Schmitt, A., M. Schuster & F. G. Barth. 1990. Daily locomotor activity pattern in three species of Cu- piennius (Araneae, Ctenidae): The males are the wandering spiders. J. Arachnol., 18:249-255. Starr, C. K. 1988. Sexual behavior in Z)/c?y«a vo/w- (Araneae, Dyctinidae). J. Arachnol., 16:321- 330. Stem, H. & E. Kullmann. 1981. Leben am seidenen Faden. Kindler, Miinchen. Alain Schmitt: Institut fiir Zoologie, Univer- sitat Wien, Althanstr. 14, A- 1090 Wien, Aus- tria. Manuscript received August 1991, revised October 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:69-71 MALE OF THE BLIND CAVE GNAPHOSOID LYGROMMA ANOPS (ARANEAE, GNAPHOSOIDEA, PRODIDOMIDAE) FROM GALAPAGOS ISLANDS, ECUADOR Peck and Shear (1987) described the prodi- domid spider Lygromma amps from female specimens collected in lava caves on Isla Santa Cruz, Galapagos, Ecuador. This species is one of three known eyeless gnaphosoid spiders, and one of only two known gnaphosoid troglobites. The lack of males left us unable to assess the rela- tionships of L. amps. Further field work by S. B. Peck in 1989 re- sulted in the collection of a total of three males from two localities. Below we describe and il- lustrate the male, and provide some new thoughts on the species’ relationships and biogeography. Lygromma amps Peck and Shear Figs. 1, 2 Lygromma anops Peck and Shear, 1987:106. Male. — From Cueva Enrique Sevilla. Total length, about 3.4 mm. Carapace 1.28 mm long, 1.12 mm wide. Eyes absent, carapace smooth, without any indication of lenses. Chelicerae with four denticles in promarginal row, single small retromarginal denticle. Other characters closely resembling those of female. Leg spination (meth- od of Platnick & Shadab 1975): femora I, II: d2- 2-0, pO-0-2; III, IV: d 1 - 1-1 , pO-0- 1 , rO-0- 1 ; tibiae 1, II; V2-2-2, pO-0-1; III, IV: v2-2-2, pl-1-1, rl- !-l, dO-1-0. Palpus (Figs. 1, 2) with bases of retrolateral tibial apophyses fused. Embolus long, robust; base of embolus broad, free from bulb, shallowly, sinuously curved. Median apophysis robust, sigmoid. Material examined.— One male-from Cueva Enrique Sevilla, 250 m elevation, 5 February 1989 (S. Peck); 2 males from 200 m elevation, Cuevas de Beliavista no. 2, March-April 1 989 (S. Peck); all from Isla Santa Cruz, Galpagos. Habitat notes.— The first locality represents a new record for Lygromma anops. Previously (Peck & Shear 1987) females and juveniles had been taken in Cueva Beliavista No. 2 (Beliavista) and Cuevas de Vargas (5 km NE of Santa Rosa). Cueva Enrique Sevilla, like the others, is in the moist transition {Scalesia) zone and is moder- ately moist at all times, probably never drying out and never flooding. Roth and Craig (1970) noted what is probably Lygromma anops from three juveniles in the Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Brussels. These speci- mens were taken from moist litter at the bottom of a crevasse 10 m deep and about 800 m from the dock of the Darwin Station. This is also known as “Grieta Iguana,” and is the water source for the Darwin Station. It is possible that Lygromma anops, like many inhabitants of lava caves, col- onizes new caves through interconnecting cracks and crevices, and that these small spaces, ina- cessible to man, are in reality its main habitat. Thus it is not surprising that examples may be found in any suitably cool and damp habitat that the spiders can reach through this maze of tiny “cavelets” (Peck 1990). Evolutionary considerations.— In the context of a detailed study of the spinneret morphology of gnaphosoid spiders, Platnick (1990) has as- signed Lygromma, formerly in the Gnaphosidae, to a revalidated Family Prodidomidae. Platnick and Shadab (1976b) give a discussion of the re- lationships of the genus Lygromma. While they were unable to analyze the evolution of the spe- cies of the genus in a comprehensive fashion due to missing data (many species are known only from one sex), they did note that three species from Venezuela {senoculatum, valencianum and huberti) seemed to be closely related to each oth- er but not to other species of Lygromma. The discovery of the male of L. anops now allows the inclusion of the Galapagos species in this group. While Platnick and Shadab (1976b) did not sug- gest any candidate synapomorphies, the males of the four species differ from other Lygromma in having the retrolateral apophyses of the male palpal tibia with their bases close together (prac- tically fused in anops), in having the embolus long and originating as a separate sclerite on the proximal surface of the bulb, and in the sigmoid median apophysis. The epigynum of L. anops is characterized by elaborate convoluted ducts. These are known to occur in one of the Vene- zuelan species, senoculatum (females of huberti 70 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 1, 2.—Lygromma anops Peck & Shear: 1. Right palpus of male, retrolateral view; 2. Same, ventral view. and valencianum are unknown; in our original description of L. anops we mistook Platnick and Shadab’s illustrations of the epigynum of L. pe- ruviana for those of huberti). Outside this group, both convoluted ducts and a sigmoid median apophysis are found in L. gertschi, a blind, cave- inhabiting species from Jamaica which we orig- inally suggested as a relative of L. anops, but this species has a very short, distally arising embolus. We doubt that eyelessness is a reasonable basis for supposing close relationship; Lygromma con- tains species with eight eyes, six, and none. Ly- gromma simoni (Ecuador) and L. peruviana have convoluted epigynal ducts, but males are not known. Are the characters we have mentioned syna- pomorphies? Platnick and Shadab (1976a) have suggested the Mexican genus Tivodrassus as the sister group of Lygromma. The two Tivodrassus species known from males have rather short em- boli but have a sigmoid median apophysis. The tibial apophyses are widely separated and have a small, dark tooth between their bases. The epi- gynal ducts are long and convoluted in all three known species. Outgroup comparison thus sug- gests that the long emboli and the approximated bases of the tibial apophyses may be synapo- morphies but that the sigmoid median apophysis and convoluted epigynal ducts are pleisomorphic within Lygromma. A second possible outgroup genus is Tricongius (Platnick & Hofer 1 990). Tri- congius amazonicus has convoluted epigynal ducts and a rather long, basally arising embolus, but the median apophysis is membranous, not sigmoid, and there is a single, strong tibial apophysis. Tricongius has a number of apomor- RESEARCH NOTES 71 phies of its own, including a bizarre modification of the cheliceral promargin. These questions of relationships can be resolved only by analyzing the full spectrum of characters in all prodidomid genera. Unfortunately each of the Venezuelan species possibly related to L. amps is known only from its type locality. However, numerous northern South American soil arthropods have extended their distrubution into the Isthmus of Panama, a known source area for Galapagos biota, and this species group of Lygromma may eventually be found there. Again, lack of data about the species composition and the distribution of mainland forms hampers study of the historical biogeography of the Galapagos soil and litter fau- na. The field work of S. B. Peck was supported in part by operating grants from the Natural Sci- ences and Engineering Research Council of Can- ada. The administration of the Galapagos Na- tional Park and the Charles Darwin Research Foundation are thanked for allowing and aiding field study in the protected habitats under their care. W. A. Shear’s contribution to the study and identification of Peck’s Galapagos collections has been supported by a grant from Hampden-Syd- ney College. This paper is Contribution No. 457 from the Charles Darwin Research Foundation. LITERATURE CITED Peck, S. B. 1990. Eyeless arthropods of the Galpagos Islands, Ecuador: composition and origin of the cryptozoic fauna of a young, tropical, oceanic ar- chipelago. Biotropica, 22:366-381. Peck, S. B. & W. A. Shear. 1987. A new blind cav- emicolous Lygromma (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) from the Galapagos Islands. Canadian Ent., 1 19:105-108. Platnick, N. I. 1990. Spinneret morphology and the phylogeny of ground spiders (Araneae, Gnaphosi- dae). American Mus. Nov., 2978:1-42. Platnick, N. I. & H. Hofer. 1990. Systematics and ecology of ground spiders (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) from central Amazonian inundation forests. Amer- ican Mus. Nov., 2971:1-17. Platnick, N. I. & M. U. Shadab. 1975. A revision of the spider genus Gnaphosa (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) in America. Bull. American. Mus. Nat. Hist., 155: 1-66. Platnick, N. I. & M. U. Shadab. 1976a. A revision of the spider genera Brass odes and Tivodrassus (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) in North America. Amer- ican Mus. Nov., 2593:1-29. Platnick, N. 1. & M. U. Shadab. 1976b. A revision of the spider genera Lygromma and Neozimiris (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). American Mus. Nov., 2598:1-23. Roth, V. D. & P. R. Craig. 1970. VII. Arachnida of the Galapagos Islands (excluding Acarina). Miss, zooi. beige lies Galap. et en Ecu. (N. et J. Leleup, 1964-1965), 2: 107-124. William A. Shear: Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden-Sydney, Virginia 23943 USA Stewart B. Peck: Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada KIS 5B6 Manuscript received August 1991, revised September 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:72 BOOK REVIEW Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L. 1991. Ecophys- iology of Desert Arthropods and Reptiles. Spring- er-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. 216 pp. 77 Figs. (Price $98.00) Cloudsley-Thompson has been writing about the ecology and biology of desert animals for over four decades. Drawing on that vast expe- rience he has produced a book that is filled to the hilt with detailed examples, often accom- panied with photographs, of the peculiar behav- iors and physiological characteristics of desert reptiles and arthropods. His descriptions of such behaviors as “sand-swimming” and “fog bask- ing” will appeal to those of us who have come to fancy the desert. The book is divided into nine chapters that focus on specific problems and adaptations of desert life. Most of these chapters address issues related to how reptiles and arthropods respond to the physical constraints of the arid environ- ment. Among these issues are thermal regulation (chapter 4), water balance and nitrogenous ex- cretion (chapter 5), phenology (chapter 6). Chap- ter eight is an excellent treatment of burrowing, mimicry, and adaptive coloration. Chapter nine is an admirable review of important biological interactions of desert animals (e.g., competition, predation, etc.). Arthropods and reptiles are discussed in sep- arate subsections within each chapter and the emphasis of the book is divided equally between the two major groups. This organization, along with the strong chapter and subsection intro- ductions, makes it possible for one to read the book from start to finish focusing only on either reptiles or arthropods. With respect to arthro- pods, Cloudsley-Thompson has drawn heavily on the works of R. A. Bradley and G. Polls (Scor- pions), C. S. Crawford (myriopods), E. B. Edney and A. C. Marsh (insects), N. F. Hadley (scor- pions and insects), W. F. Humphreys and B. Y. Main (spiders); and his review of these works is concise. The book is a valuable reference for those interested in deserts. Nevertheless, the book has a number of short- comings that detract from its usefulness as a pri- mary source on the ecology of desert animals. Cloudsley-Thompson motivates the work by suggesting that there is a need to compare and contrast the adaptations of the two most suc- cessful groups of desert animals, reptiles and ar- thropods, to “..the various parameters of the des- ert environment. .”(p. 1). Yet these “parameters” are never clearly delineated save for the chapter headings and, with few exceptions (most notably the section on burrowing), little effort is given to actually comparing the features of these two dis- parate groups. Even the discussion of conver- gence, where such comparisons could logically be made, is divided into separate sections on reptiles and arthropods. One is left wondering whether the two groups are comparable. Moreover, after 168 pages of excellent exam- ples of adaptations to desert conditions, Cloud- sley-Thompson, apparently under the strong in- fluence of Bradshaw (1986), dismisses the significance of those adaptations by suggesting that most reptiles and arthropods are preadapted for the desert extremes. He writes: “During the course of this book it must have become appar- ent that neither arthropods nor reptiles show par- ticularly marked desert adaptations” (p. 1 69). An astonishing statement from someone whose life’s work has been given over to explaining how an- imals survive in the desert. I found some of the sections to be unneces- sarily long and wordy. In particular, the discus- sion of the theoretical aspects of parallel evolu- tion and convergence is poorly developed. Also, for those unfamiliar with either the reptiles or the arthropods the index will be somewhat dif- ficult to use since, with few exceptions, common names are not included. LITERATURE CITED Bradshaw, S. D. 1988. Desert reptiles: a case of ad- aptation or pre-adaptation? J. Arid. Environ., 14: 155-174. Gary L. Miller: Department of Biology, The University of Mississippi, University, Missis- sippi 38677 USA. Manuscript received September 1991. 72 INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Manuscripts are preferred in English but may be accepted in Spanish, French or Portuguese subject to availability of appropriate reviewers. Authors whose primary language is not English, may consult the Associate Editor for assistance in obtaining help with English manuscript preparation. All man- uscripts should be prepared in general accordance with the current edition of the Council of Biological Editors ( CBE) Style Manual unless instructed otherwise below. Authors are ad- vised to consult a recent issue of the Journal of Arachnology for additional points of style. Send three identical copies of the typed material together with copies of illustrations to: Gary L. Miller, Associate Editor The Journal of Arachnology Department of Biology The University of Mississippi University, Mississippi 38677 USA Telephone: (601) 232-7495 FAX: (601) 232-5144 Bitnet: BYMILLER@UMSVM Correspondence relating to manuscripts should also be di- rected to the Associate Editor. Manuscripts longer than 1 500 words should be prepared as Feature Articles, shorter papers as Research Notes. FEATURE ARTICLES Title page.— Place in the upper left comer the complete name, address, and telephone number of the author with whom proofs and correspondence should be exchanged. Include EAX num- bers and Bitnet addresses if available. Four lines below, type the title, centered, all in capital letters. Another four lines be- low, beginning with the left margin, type each author’s name on a new line followed by the address. Abstract.— The heading should be placed at the beginning of the first paragraph set off by a period. In articles written in English, a second abstract in an acceptable language may be included pertinent to the nationality of the author(s) or geo- graphic region(s) emphasized in the article. A second abstract in English must be included in articles not written in the latter language. Text.— Double-space text, tables, legends, etc. throughout. Three levels of heads are used. The first level (METHODS, RESULTS, etc.) is typed in capitals and on a separate line. The second level head begins a paragraph with an indent and is separated from the text by a period and a dash. The third level may or may not begin a paragraph but is underscored and separated from the text by a colon. Use only the underline method to indicate italics; DO NOT USE WORD PROCES- SOR ITALICS CODES. Use the metric system unless quoting text or referencing collection data. All decimal fractions are indicated by the period regardless of language of the text. Citation of references in the text.— Include within parenthe- ses the surnames of the author(s) followed by the date of pub- lication. A comma separates multiple citations by the same author(s) and a semicolon separates citations by different au- thors, e.g., (Smith 1970), (Jones 1988; Smith 1989), (Smith 1986, 1987; Smith & Jones 1989; Jones et al. 1989). Literature cited section.— Use the following style: Lombardi, S. J. & D. L. Kaplan. 1990. The amino acid composition of major ampullate gland silk (dragline) of Ne- phila clavipes (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J. Arachnol., 18: 297-306. Krafft, B. 1982. The significance and complexity of com- munication in spiders. Pp. 1 5-66, In Spider Communica- tions: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance. (P. N. Witt & J. S. Rovner, eds.). PrincetonUniversity Press, Princeton. Footnotes.— Footnotes are only permitted on the first printed page to indicate current address or other information con- cerning the author(s). All footnotes are placed together on a separate manuscript page. Running head.— Author sumame(s) and an abbreviated title must be typed all in caps and must not exceed 60 characters and spaces. The running head is placed by itself on a separate manuscript page. Taxonomic articles.— Consult a recent taxonomic article in the Journal of Arachnology for style or contact the Associate Editor. Tables.— Each table, with the legend above, should be placed on a separate manuscript page. Only the appropriate horizontal lines should be included. Use no footnotes; instead, include all information in the legend. Make notations in the text mar- gins to indicate the preferred location of tables in the printed text. Illustrations.— Original art work should be kept by the au- thor(s) until final acceptance for publication. All art work must be mounted on stiff board ready for reproduction. In line draw- ings, pay particular attention to width of lines and size of lettering when reductions are to be made by the printer. Mul- tiple photos assembled on a single plate should be mounted with only a minimum of space separating them. In the case of multiple illustrations mounted together, each illustration must be numbered sequentially rather than given an alphabetic se- quence. Written on the back should be the name(s) ofauthor(s) and an indication of top edge. The author should indicate whether the figure should be one column or two columns in width. The overall dimensions should be no more than 1 1 inches (28 cm) x 14 inches (36 cm). Larger drawings present greater difficulty in shipping and greater risks of damage for which the JOA assumes no responsibility. The author is en- couraged to consider PMT (PhotoMechanical Transfer) repro- ductions for large drawings and to consult an Editor for details on appropriate reductions. Make notations in the text margins to indicate the preferred position of illustrations in the printed text. Legends for illustrations should be placed together on the same page(s) and separate from the illustrations. Adhere to the following styles: Eigures 1-4.— A-us x-us, male from Timbuktu: 1, left leg; 2, right chelicera; 3, dorsal aspect of genitalia; 4, ventral aspect of abdomen. Figures 27-34.— Right chelicerae of species of A-us from Timbuktu: 27,29,31,33, dorsal views; 28, 30, 32, 34, prolater- al views of moveable finger; 27, 28, A-us x-us, holotype male; 29, 30, A-us, w-us, holotype male; 31, 32, A-us z-us, holotype male; 33, 34, A-us y-us, male. Scales = 1.0 mm. Assemble manuscript for mailing.— Assemble the separate sections or pages in the following sequence; title page, abstract, text, figure legends, footnotes, running head, tables with leg- ends, figures. Page charges and reprints.— The current charge per journal page will be assessed as follows: $50— nonmembers, $45— members with grant, institutional, or other support for page costs; $25— regular members who do not have support for page costs; $20— student members who do not author with full members and who do not have support. Reprints are available only from the printer at current costs. Waiver of Page Charges.— The Editor will consider requests for a waiver of page charges for manuscripts which have been accepted for publication. Requests should be made in writing and should be submitted to the Associate Editor along with the final revision of the manuscript. The author must certify that neither grant nor institutional funds are available to cover all of the publication costs. The Society will normally agree to waive up to a maximum of 80% of the page charges, contingent on the availability of funds; the author is expected to find alternative sources for the remainder. RESEARCH NOTES Instructions above pertaining to feature articles apply also to research notes except that abstracts and most headings are not used and the byline follows the Literature Cited section. CONTENTS THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY VOLUME 20 Feature Articles NUMBER 1 Hawaiian spiders of the genus Tetragnatha II. Species from natural areas of windward east Maui, Rosemary G. Gillespie 1 Phrynidae (Amblypygi) from Andros Island, Bahamas, with notes on dis- tribution patterns, recent origin and allometry, D. Jonathan Browne 18 Web construction by Modisimus sp. (Araneae, Pholcidae), William G. Eber- hard 25 Variation in Schizocosa (Araneae: Lycosidae), Metaphidippus and Phidippus (Araneae: Salticidae), William W. M. Steiner, Matthew H. Greenstone and Gail E. Stratton 35 Systematics of Hypochilus sheari and Hypochilus coylei, two southern Ap- palachian lampshade spiders (Araneae, Hypochilidae), Ronald P. Hujf and Frederick A. Coyle 40 On the function of harlequin beetle-riding in the pseudoscorpion, Cordy- lochernes scorpioides (Pseudoscorpionida: Chemetidae), David W. Zeh and Jeanne A. Zeh 47 New species of crab spiders from Baja California Sur (Araneae: Thomisidae), Maria- Luisa Jimenez 52 Supercooling and its ecological implications in Coelotes atropos (Araneae, Agelenidae), Kefyn M. Catley 58 Research Notes Parasitism of pseudoscorpions (Arachnida) by Mermithidae (Nematoda), George O. Poinar, Jr. and Bozidar P. M. Curcic 64 Conjectures on the origins and functions of a bridal veil spun by the males of Cupiennius coccineus (Araneae, Ctenidae), Alain Schmitt 67 Male of the blind cave gnaphosoid Lygromma anops (Araneae, Gnapho- soidea, Prodidomidae) from Galapagos Islands, Ecuador, William A. Shear and Stewart B. Peck 69 Book Review Ecophysiology of Desert Arthropods and Reptiles (by J. L. Cloudsley- Thompson), Gary L. Miller 72 The Journal of ARACHNOLOGY OFFICIAL ORGAN OF THE AMERICAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 20 1992 NUMBER 2 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY EDITOR: James W. Berry, Butler University ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Gary L. Miller, The University of Mississippi EDITORIAL BOARD: A. Cady, Miami (Ohio) Univ. at Middletown; J. E. Carrel, Univ. Missouri; J. A. Coddington, National Mus. Natural Hist.; J. C. Cokendolpher, Lubbock, Texas; F. A. Coyle, Western Carolina Univ.; C. D. Don- dale, Agriculture Canada; W. G. Eberhard, Univ. Costa Rica; M. E. Galiano, Mus. Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; M. H. Greenstone, BCIRL, Columbia, Missouri; N. V. Horner, Midwestern State Univ.; D. T. Jennings, Garland, Maine; V. F. Lee, California Acad. Sci.; H. W. Levi, Harvard Univ.; E. A. Maury, Mus. Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; N. I. Platnick, American Mus. Natural Hist.; G. A. Polls, Vanderbilt Univ.; S. E. Riechert, Univ. Tennessee; A. L. Rypstra, Miami Univ., Ohio; M. H. Robinson, U.S. National Zool. Park; W. A. Shear, Hampden-Sydney Coll.; G. W. Uetz, Univ. Cincinnati; C. E. Valerio, Univ. Costa Rica. The Journal of Arachnology (ISSN 0160-8202), a publication devoted to the study of Arachnida, is published three times each year by The American Arach- nological Society. Memberships (yearly): Membership is open to all those inter- ested in Arachnida. Subscriptions to The Journal of Arachnology and American Arachnology (the newsletter), and annual meeting notices, are included with mem- bership in the Society. Regular, $30; Students, $20; Institutional, $80 (USA) or $90 (all other countries). Inquiries should be directed to the Membership Secretary (see below). Back Issues: Susan E. Riechert, Department of Zoology, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37916 USA. Undelivered Issues: Allen Press, Inc., 1041 New Hampshire Street, P.O. Box 368, Lawrence, Kansas 66044 USA. THE AMERICAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY PRESIDENT: Allen R. Brady (1991-1 993), Biology Department, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49423 USA. PRESIDENT-ELECT: James E. Carico (1991-1993), Department of Biology, Lynchburg College, Lynchburg, Virginia 24501 USA. MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY: Norman I. Platnick (appointed), American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, New York 10024 USA. TREASURER: Gail E. Stratton (1991-1993), Department of Biology, Albion College, Albion, Michigan 49224 USA. SECRETARY: Brent Opell (1991-1993), Department of Biology, Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 USA. ARCHIVIST: Vincent D. Roth, Box 136, Portal, Arizona 85632 USA. DIRECTORS: Matthew H. Greenstone (1990-1992), George W. Uetz (1991- 1993), Charles E. Griswold (1991-1993). HONORARY MEMBERS: C. D. Dondale, W. J. Gertsch, H. Homann, H. W. Levi, A. F. Millidge, M. Vachon, T. Yaginuma. Cover illustration: SEM photomicrograph of the ocularium of the opilionid Odiellus pictus (Wood). The species has a prominent trident of spines at the anterior border of its cephalothorax. Found in the eastern United States. Photo by Steven Murphree. Publication date: 2 December 1992 THIS PUBLICATION IS PRINTED ON ACID-FREE PAPER. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:73-87 TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SEGREGATION OF WEB~BUILDING IN A COMMUNITY OF ORB^WEAVING SPIDERS David Ward' and Yael Lubin; Mitrani Centre for Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer 84993, Israel ABSTRACT. The temporal pattern of activity and spatial distribution of six species of nocturnal orb-weaving spiders (Araneae: Araneidae and Tetragnathidae) were examined in coastal hedge vegetation in Israel. In Autumn, small spiders of all species built their webs early in the evening and progressively larger spiders put their webs up through the night. This activity pattern corresponded to the change in sizes of flying insects throughout the night. There was no interspecific segregation in time of activity. Spiders were highly clumped in space, but showed interspecific segregation only in web height. In Autumn, Nuctenea suspicax was the most abundant species, while in Spring Singa lucina predominated. During the latter season, spiders had two periods of activity: evening (at dusk) and morning (pre-dawn). Morning-active spiders had larger webs and larger dutches than evening-active spiders. As in Autumn, there was little interspecific segregation in time of activity or in spatial distribution. Spider removal experiments suggest that the timing of activity does not change following density reduction, but that individuals that were previously inactive may take advantage of the newly available spaces. The number of active spiders increased when sites for web attachments were added, supporting the hypothesis that space availability limits spider activity. The results are discussed in terms of the importance of niche partitioning in time and space. The study of the factors influencing the dis- tribution and abundance of animals has long been fundamental to ecology (Andrewartha & Birch 1954). The dispersion of animals in time and space has often been used to ascertain the influ- ence of conspecifics and heterospecifics on the behavioral ecology of a variety of animals (Da- vies 1 978). Web-building spiders are particularly suitable for such studies because: (1) they spend much of their time in a fixed position, facilitating measurement of dispersion, (2) they are easily manipulated, by removal or supplementation ex- periments, and (3) many species often coexist in large numbers and in relatively small areas (Rob- inson etal. 1974; Lubin 1978; HofFmaster 1985). Some studies of web-building spiders have shown that patterns of dispersion are related to aggressive interactions among individuals, which may influence website selection and web-build- ing behaviour (Riechert 1981; Pasquet 1984; Le- borgne & Pasquet 1987). Other studies, however, have indicated that individuals may aggregate in order to take advantage of clumped prey distri- butions or to reduce predation risk (e.g., Lubin ' Present address: Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T IZ4 Canada. 1974; Uetz et al. 1978, 1982; Schoener & Toft !983a). In some communities of orb-weaving spiders, there is considerable separation of spe- cies according to the vegetation types selected (Enders 1973; Harwood 1974), heights at which webs are placed (Enders 1974; Taub 1977; Olive 1980; Brown 1981), and types of prey taken (Ol- ive 1980). These differences have been used as indications of interspecific competition (Enders 1974; Brown 1981; Spiller 1984), although Spill- er (1984) noted that seasonal reversals of com- petitive advantage may occur. These studies con- trast with that of HofFmaster (1 985) who showed that, in multi-species orb-weaving spider com- munities in Panama, the spatial distributions of species were not significantly different from ran- dom. HofFmaster (1985) suggested, like Wise (1984), that interspecific interactions are not im- portant in orb-weaving spider communities. In this study, we examine the temporal and spatial distribution of web-building behavior in a guild of six nocturnal orb-weaving spider spe- cies (Araneae, Araneidae and Tetragnathidae) in coastal hedge vegetation at Ma’agan Michael, near Haifa, Israel. The structural simplicity of the veg- etation, combined with high densities of web- building spiders, suggested a potential for space limitation. Natural history observations indicat- 73 74 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY ed that there was temporal segregation of web- building behavior in these nocturnal orb-weav- ing spiders. These changes in activity appeared size-correlated, with larger spiders building their webs later in the night than small spiders. We set out to determine if the different species seg- regated temporally and to assess the possible causes of this activity pattern. We then experi- mentally manipulated both spider densities and the space available for web building in a series of short-term experiments in order to examine the interaction between temporal and spatial scales of community organization. METHODS Study area and spider dispersion.— Six orb- weaving spider species (Table 1) occur in the almost homogeneous hedges of the perrenial composite Inula viscosa (L.) Ait. surrounding fish ponds at Ma’agan Michael on the Mediterranean coast of Israel. These hedges are about 1-2 m high and 1 m wide and are bounded on one side by sand roads and by ponds on the other. The vegetation is typical of coastal Mediterranean pond-edge communities. Other plant species oc- cur patchily, notably a reed {Phragmites sp.), tamarisk trees {Tamariskia sp.) and a grass {Bw- mus sp.). The study was conducted in Autumn of 1986, 1988 and 1989 and in Spring 1989. We measured ambient temperature and relative hu- midity with a sling psychrometer (Bacharach, Inc.) at the study site before each census. Cli- matic conditions during the study periods were similar: nighttime ambient temperatures record- ed in Autumn near the ponds were 22-13.5 °C and in Spring from 22-14 °C. The relative hu- midity at night increased from 70 to > 90% from early evening to about 2300 h and remained high until dawn. Plots were established in I. viscosa hedges. We used three 15 m-long plots in our experiments in September-October 1986 and 1988, one 18 m plot in our experiments in April-May 1989 and three 3 m long plots (each separated by one meter) in October 1989. The plots were delin- eated by vertical poles connected by string at a height of 1 m above the ground, with the excep- tion of the last mentioned experiments which involved string supplementation, and were sub- divided into 1 m^ sections. Spiders with intact orb webs were denoted as active. Active spiders in the study plots were counted and identified to species at approxi- mately 2 h intervals throughout the night. We estimated spider size to the nearest mm, and measured maximum web diameter and web height above the ground (measured from the hub). To determine the relationship between spider length and web diameter, we removed spiders and measured them in the laboratory with ver- nier calipers. All mean measurements are given ± SE. Eggsacs of Singa lucina (Audouin) were collected in May 1 989 to determine whether there were changes in reproductive output associated with different temporal activity patterns in this species. Activity of spiders was studied in conjunction with trapping of flying insects (potential spider prey) using a blacklight placed above a tray of preservative (70% ethyl alcohol) in nearby hedge vegetation. While the traps may not capture the different prey types in the same proportions as webs (Eberhard 1991), we believe that the tem- poral distribution of the numerically dominant insect groups in this structurally simple habitat is adequately represented in our lighttrap sam- ples. Earlier observations showed that orb webs present in the hedges in early evening were choked with small midges that emerge from the ponds at dusk. Webs present later in the night were largely free of midges, but had large, scale-lined holes attributed to moth interceptions. We used the standard Index of Dispersion, the variance divided by the mean (I = sVx) to mea- sure the randomness and clumping of webs: I = 1 denotes random dispersion and I> 1, clumped dispersion. This index has a x“ distribution and was tested against this for significance (Pielou 1977). We used the number of spiders in the 1 m^ quadrats for the purpose of this analysis. The index of dispersion is affected by sample size, although this effect is considered to be minimal with the sample sizes we used (18 quadrats in April-May 1989 to 45 in September-October 1986 and 1988) (Pielou 1977). We calculated the index of dispersion separately for each census to minimize errors due to possible lack of indepen- dence of censuses (some spiders remained active over more than one census period). Vegetation density was measured by line tran- sects at 1 m intervals along the hedge and at 40 cm increments above the ground to determine whether there were differences in vegetation structure among the quadrats. Vegetation den- sity is expressed as the mean number of 5 cm WARD & LUBIN-TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SEGREGATION OF SPIDER ACTIVITY 75 sections of each transect line covered by vege- tation (maximum = 20). In October 1988 and in May 1989, spiders were censused in three ad- ditional 6 m plots near the ponds to determine if the different orb-weaver species had separate habitat preferences. These plots, also in the hedg- es, were chosen to represent a variety of hedge habitats differing in vegetation structure. Discriminant analysis was used to help elu- cidate the usage of different habitat and envi- ronmental selection features (vegetation density, distance from the front or exposed side of the plots, web height, distance along the plots) by the various species. Discriminant analysis dis- tinguishes among groups (spider species) by weighting and linearly combining independent variables (habitat features) into a new variable, or discriminant function, which gives maximal statistical separation of the groups (species) (Green 1971). By extracting a second, orthogo- nal, discriminant function, overlap is viewed in a plane. As many discriminant functions are ex- tracted as contribute to significant discrimina- tion among groups. Plotting species centroids along all relevant discriminant function axes (those axes that are statistically significant in a Wilks X test) gives a visual representation of overlap along a reduced set of axes. Standardized coefficients of the discriminant functions indi- cate the associations of the function with each of the original variables. Experimental manipulations. — Experimental manipulations of spider density and of space available for web construction were performed over periods of 3-5 days each in Autumn 1988 and 1989 and in Spring 1989. Removal experiments: We conducted re- moval experiments in order to test whether the temporal stratification of activity was due to space limitation acting on spiders building their webs at preferred times of the night. In September 1988, we removed all spiders as they became active each hour through the night in a 15 m plot. The temporal stratification of active spiders of the different size classes was compared with that of active spiders in an adjacent unmani- pulated 1 5 m plot. To determine if changes in spider numbers following removal could be explained by move- ment of spiders from adjacent areas, we con- ducted a second removal experiment in April 1989. We removed all active spiders in two cen- tral 3 m plots and compared spider activity in these plots with that in two adjacent 3 m plots on either side. In May 1989, we removed all the predawn active spiders (henceforth “morning spiders”) from two 3 m plots to determine whether spiders active in the post-dusk period (henceforth “eve- ning spiders”) would become “morning spiders”. In another 3 m plot, all “evening spiders” were removed, to determine whether “morning spi- ders” would change their activity pattern to be- come “evening active”. Activity in these exper- imental plots was compared with that in two neighboring control plots on either side. The re- treats (curled leaves in which the spiders sat when not active on their webs) of “morning” and “eve- ning” spiders were marked with different colors of paint to facilitate recognition. Space-supplementation experiments: We conducted space-supplementation experiments by adding strings for web attachment to two 3 m plots in spring 1989. In one, string was tied around the perimeter of the plot at 50 cm inter- vals both vertically and horizontally. String was also tied in horizontal and vertical planes through the plot, with the effect that the plot was divided into 50 cm x 50 cm x 50 cm cubes with a total of 44 m of string. In the second experimental plot, string was tied in the same manner, but at 25 cm intervals. Thus, this plot was divided into 25 cm X 25 cm x 25 cm cubes and contained 1 1 6 m of string. Another 3 m plot (control) had only a single line of string demarcating the pe- rimeter. In these experiments, each plot was first cen- sused for one night prior to string supplemen- tation in order to determine the number of spi- ders active under pre-experimental conditions. The number of spiders active subsequent to sup- plementation was then compared with the initial density in each plot, and with the control plot on the same night. RESULTS Temporal dispersion patterns.— Activity pat- terns of spiders in Autumn 1 986 and 1988 showed a peak of web-building at dusk, with additional webs appearing through the night. There was a significant increase in the size of new webs (ANOVA, P < 0.05 for each of 8 nights in 1986 and 1 988) from early evening until morning (Fig. 1). Web diameter was highly positively correlat- ed with spider body size (Spearman rank cor- relations, 1986: R = 0.86, n = 62; 1988: R = Web Diam., cm 76 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1.— The species of orb-weaving spiders in hedge vegetation surrounding the ponds at Ma’agan Michael. The two Tetragnatha species are as yet unidentified. They were distinguished by the presence of an unhumped (Sp. A) or humped (Sp. B) opisthosoma. Species (family) Orbweb Retreat Singa lucina (Araneidae) vertical curled-leaf Nuctenea suspicax (Araneidae) variable curled-leaf Larinia chloris (Araneidae) vertical underside of grass-blade Neoscona subfusca (Araneidae) generally vertical underside of leaf Tetragnatha sp. A (Tetragnathidae) variable twig Tetragnatha sp. B (Tetragnathidae) variable twig 0.75, n = 87, P < 0.0001 in both years). The increase in web size throughout the night was not due to a shift in species activity. In a two-factor ANOVA (factors = species and time), there was no significant interaction effect {P > 0.05) over any of the census nights, indicating absence of interspecific segregation in activity patterns. Rather, a large proportion (>50%) of spiders building their webs in the early evening were immatures of all species. Blacklighting of insects in Autumn showed that insects had the same size-based temporal activity patterns as the spiders. Many small insects were active early in the evening and progressively larg- er insects became active through the night (Fig. 2). At dusk, there was an emergence peak of midges (Nematocera, Chironomidae) from the ponds; by early morning, most active insects were large moths (Lepidoptera). In Spring 1989, we attempted to examine the temporal segregation of web-building behaviour more rigorously. However, at this time of year few immature spiders occurred on the plots and web-building was less evenly spaced throughout the night than in Autumn. There were two main periods of web-building, at dusk and again before dawn (Fig. 4). Insect activity patterns (deter- mined by blacklighting) followed the pattern de- scribed above for Autumn; i.e., many small in- sects appeared early in the night, and larger insects increased in numbers towards morning (Fig. 3). We marked the retreats of Singa lucina, which was the predominant species present in Spring. As the retreat is connected to the orb web by a Fig. 1.— Changes in the diameter of new webs (means and 95% C. 1. for all species combined) constructed throughout the night in Autumn 1988. Numbers of spiders are above each time period. Data for a single representative night are shown. WARD & LUBIN- TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SEGREGATION OF SPIDER ACTIVITY 77 Time at end of sampling period, hOO 1930 2230 230 530 Time at end of sampling interval , hOO Figs. 2, 3.— Numbers of insects of different size classes appearing throughout the night. Size classes are: hatched = < 10 mm total body length, clear = > 10 mm total body length; 2. Autumn 1988; 3. Spring 1989. 78 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY (/> 0.05). However, 2 of the 9 “morning and evening” clutches were parasit- ized by an unidentified dipteran, significantly in- creasing the variance in clutch size in this group. There was no significant correlation (P > 0.05) between spider size and egg number. WARD & LUBIN-TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SEGREGATION OF SPIDER ACTIVITY 79 Table 3.— Seasonal distribution of orb-weaving spiders on /. viscosa hedges at Ma’agan Michael: Percentages of different species found in the study plots on selected evening (E) or predawn (M) censuses, n = Total number of spiders. Species Nov 1988 Oct 1989 April 1989 May 1989 E M E M E M E M n 82 39 45 57 65 91 107 160 S. lucina 12.2 20.5 4.4 5.3 76.9 100 67.3 88.8 L. chloris 25.6 15.4 4.4 0 0 0 1.9 0 N. suspicax 4.9 23.1 37.8 35.0 16.9 0 24.3 10.6 N. subfusca 1.2 0 0 0 6.2 0 0.1 0 Tetragnatha A 1.2 0 2.2 0 0 0 4.7 0.1 Tetragnatha B 1.2 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 Immatures 53.7 41.0 59.7 59.7 0 0 0 0 Seasonal abundance and dispersion pat- terns.—All orb-weaving species were present in both Autumn and Spring sampling periods. However, the relative abundances of the different species and their age distribution varied season- ally (Table 3). Singa lucina, Nuctenea suspicax (O.P.-Cambridge) and Larinia chloris (Audouin) together comprised about 50% of the spiders in Autumn. In Spring, however, S. lucina alone comprised over 70% of the total number of spi- ders. N. suspicax was the second-most abundant species in Spring (10-1 7% of individuals) and L. chloris was rare. In Autumn, many small im- matures of all species (< 2 mm body length) were present (>50% of spiders in the evening census- es), whereas in Spring, most spiders were larger juveniles or adults and only very few (<0.01 %) were small immatures. In an attempt to elucidate the patterns of in- terspecific distribution, discriminant function analyses of both Autumn and Spring data were conducted, using 3-dimensional location in the quadrats and vegetation density in (1) the ex- perimental plots before manipulation in Autumn (November 1 988) and, (2) the experimental plots in Spring (May 1989) and the three additional hedge vegetation plots in May 1989. We first ran discriminant function analyses comparing 5 mm size classes of spiders, but derived no significant discriminant function (Wilks X, P > 0.05) for any of the censuses. The discriminant analyses among species de- rived two significant discriminant functions (Wilks X, P < 0.05) for the Autumn data (Fig. 5). The first discriminant function explained 75% of the variation in distribution, and was most closely related to web height (standardized dis- criminant coefficient, SDC = 0.60) and vegeta- tion density (SDC = -0.54). The second dis- criminant function, explaining an additional 1 7% of the variation among species, was most closely related to distribution along the length of the hedge (SDC = 0.96). The Spring spider distri- butions produced only one significant discrimi- nant function which explained 87% of the vari- ation in the data. This function was most closely related to web height (SDC = 0.92). To examine these patterns in greater detail, we tested for (1) overall clumping of individuals within the hedges and (2) differences among spe- cies in their distribution within the plots. In Au- tumn, the dispersion pattern of all spiders com- bined was significantly clumped at most times of night. The index of dispersion (I) was > 1 (i.e., non-random) for 9 of 14 censuses over 3 nights (x^ tests, P < 0.001, « = 45 1 m^ quadrats). However, all species were found in all quadrats (though not always at the same census), and the individual species were randomly dispersed along the hedges both in evening and in early morning censuses (x^ tests for S. lucina, L. chloris, N. sus- picax and unidentified immatures on four census dates, P > 0.05, « = 45 quadrats). We tested whether N. suspicax and L. chloris (the second- and third-most abundant species) were significantly clumped away from the most abundant species S. lucina. The null hypothesis was that the likelihood of the nearest neighbour being a conspecific or S. lucina was no different to that predicted by random association of in- dividuals, i.e., that there was no interspecific sep- aration. The null hypothesis could not be rejected (x^ tests, P > 0.05, « = 45 quadrats). Thus, N. suspicax and L. chloris were not clumped away from 5. lucina. We examined the three-dimensional distri- 80 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY .6 Nuctenea (16) .2 Unidentified (222) Lorinia (43) O f— O h- z < “.2 q: o w Q -1.0 Singa (78) i— — 1 1 1.^ I I -1.0 -.6 -.2 .2 .6 DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION 2 Fig. 5.— Spatial separation of species on experimental plots in Autumn 1988. Separation of the species’ centroids in a two-dimensional space determined by discriminant function analysis. Nuctenea subfusca and Tetragnatha spp. were excluded because of small sample sizes (< 10). Sample sizes in parentheses. bution patterns of webs within the 1 quadrats. The only difference among the species was along the height axis: webs of 5’. lucina were signifi- cantly lower in the vegetation than were those of other species (ANOVA, P < 0.001; Fig. 6). This difference was not due to differences in body size among the species (ANOVA, P > 0.05). There was no correlation within any species between spider size and web height {P > 0.05). Although we did not find any clear spatial seg- regation among the different species in Autumn, there could still occur density-dependent influ- ences on the overall abundance of one species on another. In such a situation, the slopes of the regression of the abundance of one species on another is a direct estimate of the competition coefficient for that species pair (Hallet & Pimm 1 979). We tested for such effects among the three most common species (5'. lucina, N. suspicax and L. chloris) using pairwise linear regressions of spider densities per quadrat. There were no sig- nificant correlations between any pairs of species {P > 0.05). In Spring, the dispersion of all spiders com- bined was highly clumped at all times (I » \, P < 0.001 for 8 census dates, « = 18 quadrats per census). S. lucina and N. suspicax were tested for departures from randomness among the quad- rats. N. suspicax was randomly distributed among the quadrats (« = 1 8 quadrats, 3 census dates), as was S. lucina in the evening censuses (« = 1 8 quadrats, 2 census dates). However, in the morn- ing samples, the distribution of S. lucina was significantly clumped (x^ tests, P < 0.001, n = 1 8 quadrats, 3 census dates). Clumping was as- sociated with the high densities of webs of S. lucina in the morning samples (14-24 spiders/ m^): there was a significant correlation between the value and spider density for the 8 dates tested (i? = 0.77, P = 0.01). We tested for differences in species distribu- tion in plots differing markedly in vegetation 120 6 2* sz -g ^0 78 16 43 222 + i Singa _ — I __i - Nuctenea Larinia Immatures Singa Nuctenea Neoscona Larinia Figs. 6, 7.-6. Web heights (cm) of dominant species in Autumn. Means and 95% C. I. are shown for S. lucina, N. suspicax, L. chloris and unidentified immatures (< 2 mm body length). Numbers of spiders are above each census; 7. Web heights (cm) of dominant species in Spring, as in Fig. 6. Shown are web heights on the experimental plot (April and May #1) and on three additional 3 m vegetation plots in May (May #2). Web Diam., cm 82 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 25 e E xperimental E o b JD a> 15 5 I 18 21 21 “T T 2230 0145 TIME, hOO _j — _ 0430 20 Control 22 15 10 33 “T" 17 41 _r 1 — 1 — ^ 19 22 I 4 TIME, hOO Figs. 8, 9.-8. Changes in web diameter (means and 95% C. I. of all species combined) throughout the night on the (top graph) experimental plot (spiders removed through the night) in November, 1988. Numbers of spiders are above each time period; 9. Changes in web diameter (means and 95% C. I.) on the (bottom graph) control plot (unmanipulated), as in Fig. 8. density (mean ± SE vegetation densities in three plots: 6.0 ±1.52, 9.4 ±1.65, 10.4 ±1.5). We found no significant differences in species distri- bution among the plots (Kruskal- Wallis, F > 0.05). In Spring, species composition (Table 3) changed from April to May 1989. Singa lucina and N. suspicax were dominant in both censuses. In April, however, L. chloris was absent and Neoscona subfusca (C. L. Koch) was the third WARD & LUBIN-TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SEGREGATION OF SPIDER ACTIVITY 83 Table 4.— Second removal experiment: Total num- bers of spiders on control and removal quadrats on days 1 and 2. Numbers of Y. lucina removed are shown in parentheses. El, E2 = evening censuses of days 1 and 2, respectively; Ml, M2 = morning censuses of days 1 and 2, respectively. Day 1 Day 2 Quadrats El MI E2 M2 Control 38 61 55 53 Removal 34 (26) 52 (50) 34 21 most abundant species. This was reversed in May, when N. subfusca was rare (one spider) and L. chloris was third in abundance. The spatial distribution of webs also changed from April to May (Fig. 7). In April, webs of N. suspicax were significantly higher in the hedge than one month later (ANOVA, P < 0.001) due to an influx of small individuals in the later cen- suses. In May, webs of L. chloris were signifi- cantly higher in the hedge than either S. lucina or N. suspicax (ANOVA, P < 0.05), and N. sus- picax was significantly closer to the exposed edge of the vegetation (facing away from the ponds) than the other species (ANOVA, P < 0.05). Removal experiments. — removal: In the Autumn of 1988, we removed spiders as they initiated web-building, expecting that if space was the factor preventing simultaneous activity of spiders, the larger spiders that are usually active later in the night should initiate web-building earlier. However, there was no significant differ- ence in the web diameter of spiders at each time period censused in the control and experimental plots (Figs. 8, 9), indicating that larger spiders did not take advantage of the space available to put up webs earlier in the night. Second removal: If space for web building is limiting, we expected that the removal of active spiders would open up new spaces and that new individuals would move in to occupy them. To test this, in Spring 1989, we divided an 18 m section of hedge into six contiguous 3 m^ quad- rats and removed all the active S. lucina (the dominant species) from the two central quadrats during one evening census and the following morning. New spiders became active in the removal quadrats on both the evening and morning fol- lowing the removals (Table 4). The increase in the number of evening-active spiders in the re- Table 5.— Third removal experiment: Numbers of spi- ders observed on quadrat 2 from which all S. lucina were removed on the second evening (E2); quadrats 3 and 4 combined, from which spiders were removed on the first morning (M 1 ); and quadrats 1 and 6 combined, which were unmanipulated (C). Shown are the num- bers of S. lucina only, as other species occurred only in small numbers. The numbers of spiders removed are underlined. Quad- . rat Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 El Ml E2 M2 E3 M3 E 23 25 27 20 24 22 M 41 76 22 21 — — C 33 46 25 42 32 37 moval quadrats was not significantly different from that in the control quadrats. In the morning, however, the control quadrats exhibited a decline in numbers (from 61 to 53), whereas 21 new spiders became active in the removal quadrats (x^ = 7.44, P < 0.01). Thus, the increase in the number of morning-active spiders on the re- moval quadrats may be only partly explained by movement of spiders from the control quadrats. Third removal: There were more spiders ac- tive in the morning than in the evening in Spring, and morning-active spiders had significantly larger webs and more eggs than evening-active ones (see above). Therefore, we hypothesized that morning was the preferred period of activity, but that space limitation for web-building forced some spiders to be active in the evening. Using spiders whose activity period had been deter- mined during the previous two days of obser- vation, we tested this possibility by removing all “morning only” spiders from two 3 m quadrats, expecting that “evening only” spiders would be- come active in the morning. We also removed “evening only” spiders from another 3 m quad- rat, expecting no change in the time of activity of “morning only” spiders. As in the second removal experiment, remov- ing evening spiders had little effect on the activity of spiders either the following morning or the following evening (Table 5). On the third eve- ning, new spiders replaced those that had been removed on the second evening. Removing morning-active spiders caused a significant decrease in activity on the following morning in comparison with the control plots (x^ test, P < 0.05). Activity was reduced also on the evening following removal of morning-active 84 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Fig. 10. — Changes in web height of spiders following space supplementation in October 1989. Shown are means and 95% C. I. of web height in control (C), low- string availability (L) and high-string availability (H) plots. Numbers of spiders (all census days combined) are shown above each plot. spiders. There were no significant changes in the numbers of spiders active in the morning and evening on the control plots over the three days of the experiment (x' tests, P > 0.05). Thus, the appearance of 2 1 new webs on the morning fol- lowing the removal of morning-active spiders cannot be explained by movement of spiders from the control plots into the removal plots. In all three of the removal experiments, there was no change in the web characters measured (web diameter and the number of spiral threads per cm ') with reduced population density (ANOVA, P > 0.05), suggesting that web ge- ometry is not sensitive to short-term changes in spider density. Space supplementation experiments. — In Au- tumn 1988, we found a significant positive cor- relation = 0.94, P < 0.05) between the num- ber of active spiders and the number of spiders attaching their webs to the string delineating the plots. This suggested that space for building webs was limited. To test this idea, we provided ad- ditional web supports, using string to subdivide two plots into squares of 50 cm^ (=low string availability) and 25 cm^ (=high string availabil- ity) respectively. The number of spiders active did not increase significantly in the high string-availability plot on the night immediately after supplementation, but increased four-fold on the second night (from 28-119 spiders; x" = 30.90, P < 0.001). Web height decreased significantly as more supports for web-building became available closer to the ground (ANOVA, P < 0.05; Fig. 10). There was no significant change in the number of spiders active in the low-string availability plot after sup- plementation (x^ tests, P > 0.05), nor in the con- trol plot. Had these changes in activity in the high-string availability plot been due to in- creased disturbance, we would expect a reduction rather than an increase in activity. Thus, we as- cribe this change to extra supports provided for web-building. DISCUSSION Temporal segregation of activity.— We have shown that the spiders use stratified activity pe- riods in Autumn to partition a homogeneous habitat. In a review of resource partitioning in animal communities, Schoener (1986) observed that resource partitioning most commonly oc- curs by division of habitat use, then of food and only rarely, time. He suggests that theoretically there is no advantage to temporal specialization because no energetic gain can be derived from not feeding during most time periods (for em- pirical evidence, see Jaksic 1982). Temporal spe- cialization should occur only if the risk of pre- dation is large relative to the need for energy, and then all species may specialize on the same time period (Schoener 1986). For the Ma’agan Michael orb-weavers, small spiders that are active early in the evening can prey on the large numbers of small Nematocera emerging from ponds at dusk, while spiders for- aging later in the evening have small numbers of large prey available. Why are large spiders not active earlier? Three possible explanations are: ( 1 ) Large webs are inefficient for trapping small prey; (2) Webs are damaged or clogged by many small insects, producing low rewards per unit effort of silk production; (3) There is a greater predation risk early in the evening than later on. We favor the last explanation because early activity would at least yield some food and a damaged web may be renewed. For example, at least some individuals of S. lucina in Spring re- WARD & LUBIN-TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SEGREGATION OF SPIDER ACTIVITY 85 newed their webs for both morning and evening activity. Thus, prey arguments ( 1 and 2) do not apply. However, to take advantage of dusk insect emergences, webs must be built in the light. Large spiders in large webs are more vulnerable than smaller ones because they tend to be higher in the vegetation and, in the case of N. suspicax, closer to the exposed edge of the vegetation. In Spring, temporal stratification was not cor- related with either spider size or web size, al- though we observed the same pattern of insect activity as in Autumn, i.e., small insects active early and larger insects active later in the night. However, for S. lucina, spiral density was greater in “morning spiders”, whose activity coincided with that of larger flying insects, than in “evening spiders”. This supports Eberhard’s (1986) hy- pothesis that webs designed to intercept large prey should have greater spiral density (and therefore greater resilience) than orbs designed for small prey. Further investigation is required to establish whether this difference in spiral den- sity is a behavioral response to prey size avail- ability. In Spring, “morning only” and “morning and evening” individuals of S. lucina produced more eggs than did “evening only” individuals. As these differences were uncorrelated with body size, it is not clear what prevented some spiders from becoming active in the early morning. Our sec- ond and third removal experiments indicate that there was no major shift of activity from evening to morning following removal of spiders from plots. Active spiders did not take advantage of the extra space provided in either evening or morning periods, although spiders that were hitherto inactive became active. Given the ad- vantage to morning activity, it is puzzling that some spiders retain their low-reward (evening) activity periods. We suggest the following expla- nations that bear further investigation: First, eve- ning-active spiders may have a more reliable, albeit lower quality, food resource (Nematocera) than morning-active spiders. Second, short-term experiments may allow insufficient time for spi- ders to adjust their activity pattern to a new sit- uation. Spatial distribution. — Clumped distribution, especially of small or subordinate individuals in the presence of dominant individuals, may in- dicate aggression (Pielou 1977). In spite of con- siderable evidence of clumped distribution of spiders in this study, we were unable to detect strong interspecific interactions. There was little interspecific separation of the species on any axis examined, although L. chloris was on occasion significantly higher in the vegetation than the other species, and S. lucina significantly lower in the vegetation in Autumn than the other species. Divergence in web height selection has been found in other studies of orb-weavers (Enders 1974, 1975; Tolbert 1975; Olive 1980; Brown 1981) although species populations often switch ver- tical positions in different studies (Brown 1981). In our study, switches in web height selection were also found, notably in N. suspicax (Fig. 7), perhaps as an effect of a seasonal change in the mean size of spiders. Our study indicates that the slight interspecific differences that occurred were not due to inter- specific interaction, because there was no change in the pattern of activity or in species compo- sition with removal of potential competitors. Only a single case of overt interspecific aggres- sion was observed in 24 nights (a N. suspicax removed the web of a L. chloris). A lack of move- ment in response to short-term changes in con- ditions may be typical of species with rolled-leaf retreats (e.g., S. lucina and N. suspicax, see Table 1) which have relatively fixed websites. There is little other evidence that interspecific competition occurs in orb-weavers (Brown 1981; Wise 1984). Manipulative studies indicate that yearly differences in weather patterns may affect population densities and foraging patterns as much as, if not more than, competition (Wise 1981; Horton & Wise 1983). Thus, only Spiller (1984) has shown that interspecific competition occurs between orb-weavers. There too seasonal reversal of competitive advantage occurred, so the long-term effects of competition on the two species studied may be minimal. Other studies (Spiller & Schoener 1 988, 1 989; Schoener & Toft 1983b) have shown that predators (lizards) may have more important effects on spider densities than competition. Although interspecific competition for living space does not appear to play an overt role in the community of orb-weavers at Ma’agan Mi- chael, intraspecific competition (e.g., “scramble competition”, see MacArthur 1972) may have an important effect on activity. Space limitation restricts the web-building activity of some spi- ders, although the results of the string supple- mentation experiments indicate that the spiders may only react, over short periods, to a large 86 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY increase in space availability. Other field exper- iments have revealed significant intraspecific competition between spiders (Coleboum 1974; Wise 1975; Schaefer 1978; Riechert 1981), al- though certainly not in all species studied (Wise 1981, 1983; Horton & Wise 1983). An interesting possibility is that a “lottery for living space” (Sale 1977) exists in this spider community. Spiller (1984) has also suggested that a lottery model best explained the seasonal re- versal of competitive advantage between two species of orb-weaving spiders. Chesson & War- ner (1981) modelled the lottery system based on competition for space. When the environment varies such that each species has times when it can have strong recruitments, the net effect is to favor positive growth rates at low density for all species (Chesson 1986). On the hedges at Ma’agan Michael, S. lucina and N. suspicax fluctuate in abundance and ex- hibit a seasonal reversal in dominance. These fluctuations are apparently associated with dif- ferent reproductive periods of the species (May for S. lucina, September-October for N. suspi- cax). Natural history observations at Ma’agan Michael indicate that there is considerable pre- dation on spiders by leaf-gleaning warblers (mostly Phylloscopus spp., Sylviidae), particu- larly during the Spring and Autumn bird migra- tions. We suggest that predation may influence orb-weaver community structure in these hedges as follows: The first spiders, regardless of species, to become active after recruitment may establish control over empty sites. By being the first spi- ders to establish, they may grow quicker and reach large sizes earlier. As observed intraspe- cifically in S. lucina, those spiders using the pre- ferred activity periods have the largest clutches. However, predators will encounter more spiders of the common species (especially because spider species are mostly distributed at random within the hedges) and this should result in greater pre- dation on the dominant species. Vacant areas in the hedge may be taken over by new recruits or by previously inactive spiders. Therefore, differ- ences in the time of recruitment will cause dif- ferent species of spider to be dominant at differ- ent times of year, while predation and/or other environmental effects (e.g., storms) will facilitate coexistence. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank all the Ben Gurion University stu- dents of the Field Ecology course who partici- pated in the Ma’agan Michael experiments; R. Gil, Y. Shak and the staff of the Hof HaCarmel Field Study School (Ma’agan Michael) for their help and permission to work in the Nature Re- serve; and G. Levy (Hebrew University of Je- rusalem) for identification of the spiders. This is publication no. 143 of the Mitrani Centre for Desert Ecology. LITERATURE CITED Andrewartha, H. G. & L. C. Birch. 1954. The dis- tribution and abundance of animals. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago. Brown, K. E. 1981. Foraging ecology and niche par- titioning in orb-weaving spiders. Oecologia (Berlin), 50:380-385. Chesson, P. L. 1986. Environmental variation and the coexistence of species. Pp. 240-256, In Com- munity ecology (J. L. Diamond & T. J. Case, eds.). Harper & Row, New York. Chesson, P. L. & R. R. Warner. 1981. Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery compet- itive systems. American Nat., 1 17:923-943. Coleboum, P. H. 1974. The influence of habitat stmcture on the distribution of Araneus diadematus Clerck. J. Anim. Ecol., 43:401-409. Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science, 199:1302-1309. Davies, N. B. 1978. Ecological questions about ter- ritorial behaviour. Pp. 315-350, In Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach (J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies, eds.) Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. Eberhard, W. G. 1986. Effects of orb-web geometry on prey interception and retention. Pp. 70-100, In Spiders: webs, behavior and evolution (W. A. Shear, ed.). Stanford University Press, Stanford. Eberhard, W. G. 1991. Function and phylogeny of spider webs. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 21:341-372. Enders, F. 1973. Selection of habitat by the spider Argiope aurantia Lucas (Araneidae). American Midi. Natur., 90:47-55. Enders, F. 1974. Vertical stratification in orb-web spiders (Araneidae, Araneae) and a consideration of other methods of coexistence. Ecology, 55:317-328. Enders, F. 1975. The influence ofhunting manner on prey size, particularly in spiders with long attack distances. American Nat., 109:737-763. Green, R. H. 1971. A multivariate statistical ap- proach to the Hutchinsonian niche: bivalve mol- luscs of centra! Canada. Ecology, 52:543-556. Hallet, J. G. & S. L. Pimm. 1979. Direct estimation of competition. American Nat., 1 13:593-599. Harwood, R.H. 1974. Predatory behavior of aurantia Lucas. Amer. Midi. Natur., 91:130-139. Hoffmaster, D. K. 1985. Community composition and nearest neighbour relationships in orb-weaving WARD & LUBIN-TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SEGREGATION OF SPIDER ACTIVITY 87 spiders: the product of aggression? Behav. Ecol. So- ciobioL, 16:349-353. Horton, C. C. & D. H. Wise. 1 983. The experimental analysis of competition between two syntopic spe- cies of orb-web spiders (Araneae: Araneidae). Ecol- ogy, 64:929-944. Jaksic, F. M. 1982. Inadequacy of activity time as a niche difference: the case of diurnal and nocturnal raptors. Oecologia (Berlin), 52:171-175. LeBorgne, R. & A. Pasquet. 1987. Influences of ag- gregative behaviour on space occupation in the spi- der Zygiella x-notata (Clerck). Behav. Ecol. Socio- biol., 20:203-208. Lubin, Y. D. 1974. Adaptive advantages and the evo- lution of colony formation in Cyrtophora (Araneae: Araneidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 54:321-339. Lubin, Y.D. 1978. Seasonal abundance and diversity of web-building spiders in relation to habitat struc- ture on Barro Colorado island, Panama Canal Zone. J. Arachnol., 6:31-51. MacArthur, R. H. 1972. Geographical ecology. Harp- er & Row, New York. Menge, B. A. & J. P. Sutherland. 1976. Species di- versity gradients: synthesis of the roles of predation, competition and temporal heterogeneity. American. Nat., 110:351-369. Olive, C. W. 1980. Foraging specializations in orb- weaving spiders. Ecology, 61:1 133-1 144. Pasquet, A. 1984. Repartition de deux especes d’Ar- aignees orbiteles, Amneus marmoreus (Clerck) et Araneus diadematus (Clerck) dans une prairie en friches. Biol. Behav., 9:321-331. Pielou, E. C. 1977. Mathematical ecology. John Wi- ley & Sons, New York. Riechert, S. E. 1981. The consequences of being ter- ritorial in spiders: a case study. American Nat., 117: 871-892. Riechert, S. E. & A. B. Cady. 1983. Patterns of re- source use and tests for competitive release in a spider community. Ecology, 64:899-913. Robinson, M. H., Y. D. Lubin & B. Robinson. 1974. Phenology and natural history of web-building spi- ders on three transects at Wau, New Guinea. Pacific Insects, 16:1 18-162. Sale, P. F. 1977. Maintenance of high diversity in coral reef fish communities. American Nat., Ill: 337-359. Schaefer, M. 1978. Some experiments on the regu- lation of population density in the spider Floronia bucculenta (Araneidae: Linyphiidae). Symp. Zool. Soc. London, 42:203-210. Schoener, T. W. 1 986. Resource partitioning. Pp. 9 1- 1 26, In Community ecology: pattern and process (J. Kikkawa & D. J. Anderson, eds.). Blackwell Sci- entific Publications, Melbourne. Schoener, T. W. & C. A. Toft. 1983a. Dispersion of a small-island population of the spider Metepeira datona (Araneae: Araneidae) in relation to web-site availability. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 12:121-128. Schoener, T. W. & C. A. Toft. 1983b. Spider popu- lations: extraordinarily high densities on islands without top predators. Science, 210:1041-1043. Spiller, D. A. 1984. Seasonal reversal of competitive advantage between two spider species. Oecologia (Berlin), 64:322-331. Spiller, D. A. & T. W. Schoener. 1988. An experi- mental study of the effect of lizards on web-spider communities. Ecol. Monogr., 58:57-77. Spiller, D. A. & T. W. Schoener. 1989. Effect of a major predator on grouping of an orb-weaving spi- der. J. Anim. Ecol., 58:509-523. Tolbert, W. W. 1975. Predator avoidance and be- haviors and web defensive structures in the orb- weavers Argiope aurantia Lucas and Argiope trifas- ciata Forskai (Araneae: Araneidae). Psyche, 82: 29-52. Uetz, G. W., A. D. Johnson & D. W. Schemske. 1978. Web placement, web structure, and prey capture in orb-weaving spiders. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 4:141-148. Uetz, G. W., T. C. Kane & G. E. Stratton. 1982. Variation in the social group tendency of a com- munal web-building spider. Science, 217: 547-549. Wise, D. H. 1975. Food limitation on the spider Linyphia marginata: experimental field studies. Ecology, 56:637-646. Wise, D. H. 1981. Inter- and intraspecific effects of density manipulations upon females of two orb- weaving spiders (Araneae: Araneidae). Oecologia (Berlin), 48:252-256. Wise, D. H. 1983. Competitive mechanisms in a food- limited species: relative importance of interference and exploitative interactions among labyrinth spi- ders (Araneae: Araneidae). Oecologia (Berlin), 58: 1-9. Wise, D. H. 1984. The role of competition in spider communities: insights from field experiments with a model organism. Pp. 42-53, In Ecological com- munities: conceptual issues and the evidence (D. R. Strong, D. S. Simberloff, L. G. Abele & A. Thistle, eds.). Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton. Manuscript received August 1991, revised January 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:88-93 HABITAT SEGREGATION BY SPECIES OF METAPHIDIPPUS (ARANEAE: SALTICIDAE) IN MINNESOTA Bruce Cutler: Electron Microscope Laboratory and Department of Entomology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-2106 USA Daniel T. Jennings: North Central Forest Experiment Station, 1992 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 USA ABSTRACT. Four species of Metaphidippm (Araneae: Salticidae) occupied different habitat types in Min- nesota; M. ahzonensis was found exclusively in sand prairie; M. Jlavipedes was almost completely restricted to conifers; M. insignis primarily inhabited open, non-canopy vegetation (e.g., grasslands); whereas, M. protervus occupied most habitats, but most evidently shaded forest understory and wetlands. Reasons for such habitat partitioning are conjectural. Size differences among the four species probably were not ecologically significant based on Dyar’s constant; however, competition for prey may have influenced habitat selection. Metaphidippus is one of the largest genera of jumping spiders in North America (Richman & Cutler 1978). Revision of the genus by other workers will probably redefine the taxonomy and introduce new generic names; however, the spe- cies discussed here will remain in one genus. When we first started collecting jumping spi- ders in Minnesota, it quickly became evident that different species were found only in specific hab- itats. This was particularly noticeable in species of Metaphidippus because our favorite collecting methods— sweep netting and beating vegeta- tion-garnered large numbers of these vegeta- tion-inhabiting spiders. Over a 25 year period, most parts of the state were visited and habitat data recorded whenever salticids were collected. The data was analyzed and a hypothesis for hab- itat segregation (Dyar’s constant) considered. METHODS Specimens of Metaphidippus arizonensis (Peckham & Peckham), M. Jlavipedes (Peckham & Peckham), M. insignis (Banks), and M. pro- tervus (Walckenaer) were collected predomi- nantly by sweep netting; however, beating foliage also yielded a few specimens. Collection heights were not controlled or recorded. If necessary, laboratory rearing was done in the case of an- tepenultimate and penultimate instars to confirm identifications based on adult genitalia. Spiders were kept at ambient temperatures in Petri dish- es with moist pieces of sponge, and fed Dro- sophila adults and Tribolium larvae until mature. To avoid sampling bias, individual sites were counted only once even if repeatedly collected. A site was considered a stand of vegetation iso- lated from another stand by an intervening stand of different vegetation, or by a large physical ob- stacle. In many cases, collected sites were sepa- rated by many kilometers; others were adjacent and differed only in vegetation. All sites were in Minnesota. Collecting dates were from April- October. Negative catches were not recorded; tabulated data consisted only of samples that yielded spec- imens. Carapace widths between row III eyes were measured with an ocular micrometer for 50 mature females of M. Jlavipedes, M. insignis, and M. protervus, and for 35 mature females of M. arizonensis. Tukey’s Studentized Range (HSD) Test (SAS 1985) was used for comparisons of carapace widths among species at P < 0.05. RESULTS Figure 1 shows the Minnesota counties col- lected and the species of Metaphidippus found. Table 1 compares species presence/absence with- in the different habitats. With only one excep- tion, because of small sampling size (deciduous- tree foliage), species were unequally distributed within each habitat investigated (Table 1). We conclude that 1) specific habitats support few (1- 3) species of Metaphidippus, and 2) species pres- ence within a habitat usually is dominated by a single species, less frequently by two species. Habitat breadth or specificity (i.e., the number 88 CUTLER & JENNINGS -HABITAT SEGREGATION OF METAPHIDIPPUS 89 Table 1.— A comparison of species occurrence within and over all habitats studied in Minnesota, 1964 to 1989. Habitat Sum of individual collections/habitat by Metaphidippus species arizonensis flavipedes insignis protervus Conifer foliage 0 41 0 0 Deciduous-tree foliage 0 1 0 3 Coniferous-tree understory 0 2 0 7 Deciduous understory 0 0 0 31 Wetland 0 0 1 10 Old field 0 0 1 6 Mixed meadow 0 0 13 10 Mesic prairie 0 1 19 1 Sand prairie 7 0 1 2 Crops 0 0 1 4 All 7 45 36 74 of habitats occupied by each species) also varied considerably among the four species of Meia- phidippus (Table 2). For example, M. arizonensis was found only in sand prairie, whereas M. pro- tervus was found in 9 of the 10 habitats inves- tigated. However, these results must be inter- preted with caution because sampling intensity varied among habitats. Dice-Lerra diagrams of carapace width mea- surements are given in Figure 2 for the four spe- cies of Metaphidippus. Means for all species pairs were significantly different {P < 0.05), except the pair M. insignis - M. protervus. DISCUSSION Species partitioning by habitat is a well known phenomenon among many groups of animals (Schoener 1974). Good examples exist for the predominantly ground-dwelling lycosid spiders in the genus Pardosa (Den Hollander & Lof 1974; Greenstone 1980; Hallander 1970; Lowrie 1973; Vlijm & Kessler-Geschiere 1967; Vogel 1972). However, habitat partitioning among non-snare building, vegetation-inhabiting spiders has been little investigated. A few papers discuss the hab- itat preferences of individual species (Jennings 1976, and papers cited therein; Jennings & Col- lins 1987b), but rarely in the context of coexisting phylogenetically related species. Turner & Polis (1979) considered the members of a raptorial, non-snare building guild of spiders on inflores- cences of a coastal sagebrush community in Cal- ifornia. Included were three species of the crab spider genus Misumenops. Each species over- lapped in occurrence on the shrubs, but the two common Misumenops species were most fre- quently found on different shrub species. Turner & Polis (1979) concluded that it was unlikely that widespread competition for food and space re- sources occurred among guild members. Inter- ference competition, i.e., interspecific predation by guild members, was evoked as the determi- nator of guild structure (Turner & Polis 1979). Within Metaphidippus, species determina- tions can be difficult. Misidentifications are pos- sible, indeed probable. For example, it is likely that M. exiguus (Banks) found on jackpine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) in Manitoba (Bradley & Hinks 1968) are M. flavipedes (Peckham & Peckham). Nevertheless, clearly there are indicated habitat preferences for Metaphidippus species in the lit- erature (Allen et al. 1970; Berry 1970; Dondale etal. 1979; Ives 1967; Jennings & Collins 1987a, b; Legner & Oatman 1964; Lowrie 1968; Mason &Paul 1 988; Stiettenroth& Homer 1987; Young & Lockley 1990). Table 2. —Comparison of Metaphidippus species oc- currence among 10 habitats in Minnesota, 1964 to 1989. Species No. of habitats species found in Sum of collections yielding species M. arizonensis 1 7 M. flavipedes 4 45 M. insignis 6 36 M. protervus 9 74 All species 10 162 90 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 1.— Localities of Metaphidippus species collected in Minnesota. M. arizonensis = ★, M. flavipedes = □, M. insignis = O, M. protervus = A. During our study, special efforts were made to collect spiders on tamarack, Larix laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch, because it is the only deciduous conifer in Minnesota. Despite these efforts no species of Metaphidippus was found, although another jumping spider, Eris militaris (Hentz), did occur. Interestingly, Ives ( 1 968) reported both E. militaris and M. protervus from tamarack in Manitoba; however, M. flavipedes is the expected conifer-inhabiting Metaphidippus in Manitoba, as reported by Bradley & Hinks (1968). In Min- nesota, M. flavipedes was collected on all species of conifers sampled except for tamarack and northern white-cedar {Thuja occidentalis L.); however, the latter was scarcely sampled. Strat- ton et al. (1979) also sampled northern white- cedar in Minnesota and found several genera of salticids, but species of Metaphidippus wtre iden- tified only to genus. In his investigation of spiders on a small island in northern Lake Michigan, Width (mm) CUTLER & JENNINGS -HABITAT SEGREGATION OF METAPHIDIPPUS 91 15 1.45 1.4 1.35 1.3 1.25 1.2 1.15 1.1 1.05 1.0 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 A F I P Metaphidippus species Figure 2.— Dice-Lerra Diagram for distance between row III eyes in four Metaphidippus species. (A = Me- taphidippus arizonensis, F = M. flavipedes, I = M. insignis, P - M. pwtervus). Drew (1967) carefully collected from different vegetation types including trees. M. flavipedes was among the commonest species collected on Juniperus communis (reported as J. depressus) and on northern white-cedar, whereas M. pro- tervus was commonest in the herb-shrub stratum of the upland hardwood forest. Both species of Metaphidippus occurred at lower frequencies in 92 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY the old field community and in other commu- nities (marshes, beach). That small salticid species should partition by type of space occupied, rather than successive temporal occurrence, was predicted by Enders (1975) based on previous habitat-sampling stud- ies. The Metaphidippus species we investigated had similar temporal occurrences of adults, i.e., many mature males and rare mature females in September and October. Both sexes of all four species are mature in May and June, with mature females persisting into August. However, we did not closely measure temporal succession at any one site where two or more species were found. Nevertheless, our data lends support to Enders’ hypothesis that species segregate by habitat. One possible reason for habitat segregation by Metaphidippus species is competition for similar sized prey. However, with general collections such as ours, the morphological information of the specimens themselves is often the only data that can be analyzed. Prosomal size differences were statistically significant among all but one of the six species-pair combinations, but it may not be ecologically significant. In the laboratory, Homer & Starks (1972) found that the average percent- age difference of prosomal length between molts of Metaphidippus galathea (Walckenaer) was 1 8% (Dyar’s constant). Dyar’s constant has been evoked as a means of determining the minimum difference in ecological isolation for prey size among different instars of a spider species (En- ders 1976). The same explanation should ac- count for size differences among closely related species. The greatest percentage difference among prosomal measurements in the species pairs dis- cussed here was less than 13% (M. arizonensis vs. M. protervus). Assuming that the average per- cent difference (18%) between instars of M. gal- athea also applies to species of Metaphidippus found in Minnesota, then prosomal size differ- ences among species apparently were not signif- icant in determining ecological isolation. We conclude that these species show a potential of competing for similar sized prey based on the absence of appreciable size differences. This paper demonstrates that species of Me- taphidippus occupy different habitats in Minne- sota. Size differences among the Metaphidippus species apparently are not great enough to pre- vent competition for similar sized prey. Other approaches, including experimental studies, should provide some answers as to how habitat separation is maintained. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank those who have helped this study in various capacities. Robert Dana, Minnesota; and Ronald L. Huber, Kansas assisted with field col- lections in Minnesota. Permission to collect on properties under their supervision was gener- ously provided by The Nature Conservancy- Minnesota, and by Cedar Creek Natural History Area-University of Minnesota. Portions of this research were completed during the junior au- thor’s tenure with the USDA, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 180 Canfield Street, Morgantown, West Virginia. Dr. Andrew Liebhold, USDA Forest Service, Mor- gantown, West Virginia, assisted with data anal- yses. LITERATURE CITED Allen, D. C., F. B. Knight & J. L. Foltz. 1970. In- vertebrate predators of the jack-pine budworm, Choristoneura pinus, in Michigan. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America, 63:59-64. Berry, J. W. 1970. Spiders of the North Carolina piedmont old-field communities. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc., 86:97-105. Bradley, G. A. & J. D. Hinks. 1968. Ants, aphids, andjackpine in Manitoba. Canadian Entomol., 100: 40-50. Den Hollander, J. & H. Lof. 1972. Differential use of the habitat by Pardosa pullata (Clerck) and Par- dosa prativaga (L. Koch) in a mixed population. Tijdschrift Entomol., 1 15:205-215. Dondale, C. D., B. Parent & D. Pitre. 1979. A 6 -year study of spiders (Araneae) in a Quebec apple or- chard. Canadian Entomol., 1 1 1:377-380. Drew, L. C. 1967. Spiders of Beaver Island, Michi- gan. Michigan State Univ., Publications of the Mu- seum, Biological Series 3:152-208. Enders, F. 1975. The influence ofhunting manner on prey size, particularly in spiders with long attack distances (Araneidae, Linyphiidae, and Salticidae). American Nat., 109:737-763. Enders, F. 1976. Size, food-finding, and Dyar’s Con- stant. Environ. Entomol., 5:1-10. Greenstone, M. H. 1980. Contiguous allotopy of Par- dosa ramulosa and Pardosa tuoba (Araneae: Lycos- idae) in the San Francisco Bay Region, and its im- plications for patterns of resource partitioning in the genus. American Mid. Nat., 104:305-31 1. Hallander, M. 1970. Prey, cannibalism, and micro- habitat selection in the wolf spiders Pardosa chelata O. F. Muller and P. pullata (Clerck). Oikos, 21:337- 340. Homer, N. & K. J. Starks. 1972. Bionomics of the jumping spider Metaphidippus galathea. Annals En- tomol. Soc. America, 65:602-607. Ives, W. G. H. 1967. Relations between invertebrate CUTLER & JENNINGS- HABITAT SEGREGATION OF METAPHIDIPPUS 93 predators and prey associated with larch sawfly eggs and larvae on tamarack. Canadian EntomoL, 99: 607-622. Jennings, D. T. 1976. Spiders on black walnut. Amer- ican Mid. Nat., 95:1 1 1-119. Jennings, D. T. & J. A. Collins. 1987a. Spiders on red spruce conifer foliage in northern Maine. J. Ar- achnoL, 14:303-314. Jennings, D. T. & J. A. Collins. 1987b. Coniferous- habitat associations of spiders (Araneae) on red spruce foliage. J. ArachnoL, 14:315-326. Legner, E. F. & E. R. Oatman. 1964. Spiders on apple in Wisconsin and their abundance in a natural and two artificial environments. Canadian EntomoL 96: 1202-1207. Lowrie, D. C. 1968. The spiders of the herbaceous stratum of the Jackson Hole region V/yoming. Northwest Sci., 42:89-100. Lowrie, D. C. 1973. The microhabitats of western wolf spiders in the genus Pardosa. EntomoL News, 84:103-116. Mason, R. R. & H. G. Paul. 1988. Predation on larvae of douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), by Metapkidippus aeneolus (Araneae: Salticidae). Pan-Pacific Ento- moL, 64:258-260. Richman, D. & B. Cutler. 1978. A list of the jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) of the United States and Canada. Peckhamia 1:82-109. Robinson, J. V. 1981. The effect of architectural vari- ation in habitat on a spider community: experi- mental field study. Ecology, 62:73-80. SAS Institute. 1985. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Car- olina. Schoener, T. W. 1974. Resource partitioning in eco- logical communities. Science, 185:27-39. Stiettenroth, C. L. & N. V. Homer. 1987. The jump- ing spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) of the Virginia Pen- insula. EntomoL News, 98:235-245. Stratton, G. E., G. W. Uetz & D. G. Dillery. 1979. A comparison of the spiders of three coniferous tree species. J. Arachnol., 6:219-226. Turner, M. & G. A. Polis. 1979. Patterns of coexis- tence in a guild of raptorial spiders. J. Anim. EcoL, 48:509-520. Vlijm, L. & A. Kessler-Geschiere. 1967. The phe- nology and habitat of Pardosa monticola, P. nigri- ceps, and P. pullata (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Anim. EcoL, 36:31-56. Vogel, B. R. 1972. Apparent niche sharing of two Pardosa species (Araneida: Lycosidae). Armadillo Papers 7, 1 3 pp. Young, O. P. & T. C. Lockley. 1990. Autumnal pop- ulations of arthropods on aster and goldenrod in the delta of Mississippi. J. Entomol. Sci., 25:185-195. Manuscript received February 1992, revised March 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:94-106 DEVELOPMENTAL PLASTICITY AND FECUNDITY IN THE ORB-WEAVING SPIDER NEPHILA CLAVIPES Linden E. Higgins: Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712 USA ABSTRACT. To document variation in several developmental parameters and the elfect of this variation on female adult size and fecundity, marked individuals were followed in three disjunct populations of the widely distributed spider Nephila clavipes (Araneae: Tetragnathidae). The sites chosen had very different physical and biological conditions which were expected to affect the development of the animals. Several developmental parameters were very plastic, such as weight gain and number of juvenile instars, varying both among and within populations. In contrast, two important developmental parameters, growth per molt and pre-molt weight, were constrained within each population but differed between tropical and temperate conditions. Constraining growth per molt established a developmental trajectory, and variation of its slope and of the number of juvenile instars were the primary causes of variation in adult female size and the correlated variation in the fecundity per egg sac. RESUMEN. Para explorar la variacion en parametros de ontogenia y la consequencia de esta variacion para el tamano en hembras maduras, un estudio del campo usando individuos marcados fue hecho en tres poblaciones disconectadas de la arana Nephila clavipes (Araneae: Tetragnathidae). Los sitios escojidos presen- taban condiciones fisicas y biologicas muy distintas, los cuales se anticipaban a influir fuertamente en la ontogenia de los animates. Algunos parametros ontegeneticos se demostraban muy plasticos, mostrando variacion tanto dentro, como entre poblaciones, mientras que otros parametros fueron menos plasticos. Dos parametros im- portantes en el cresimiento de las aranas, el cresimiento por muda y el peso antes de mudar, no variaban dentro de cada poblacion, pero mostraban variacion entre condiciones tropicales y templadas. Inflexibilidad en el parametro de cresimiento por muda produce una trayectoria ontogenetica. Variacion en el pendiente de tal trajectoria y en el numero de estadios juveniles son los causas principales de la variacion observado en el tamano de las hembras maduras. In a variety of arthropods, variation in adult size has been correlated with differences in male competitive ability, voltinism, female fecundity, and other parameters of fitness (e. g., Lawlor 1976; Harrington 1978; Christenson & Goist 1979; Eberhard 1982; Morse & Fritz 1987; At- kinson & Begon 1987). In insects, correlations of variation in size with environmental and bi- ological factors have been utilized to develop models describing the evolution of arthropod life histories (Tauber & Tauber 1978; Masaki 1978; Mousseau & Rolf 1989). Changes in size and voltinism are often correlated with latitude and altitude (Masaki 1978; Mousseau & Roff 1989; Dingle, Mousseau & Scott 1990). However, few studies have investigated the proximal cause of variation in adult size: variation in juvenile de- velopment (c/. Hugueny & Louveaux 1986). In most insects and spiders, growth is deter- minate and the age and size at maturity are gov- erned by the number of instars, intermolt du- ration, and growth at each molt. Variation in juvenile development, due either to genetic dif- ferences (Newman 1 988a; Mousseau & Roff 1 989) or to environmentally induced plasticity (Schmalhausen 1949; Steams 1983; Steams & Koella 1 986; Newman 1 988b), will result in vari- ation in adult size and age at maturity. Size and age at first reproduction are correlated with fe- male fitness in many invertebrates and ecto- thermic vertebrates, changing female fecundity and the probability of death prior to reproduc- tion. First, female fecundity increases with in- creased body size (Turnbull 1962; Toft 1976; Harrington 1978; Seigel & Fitch 1984; Palmer 1985; Fritz & Morse 1985; Miyashita 1986; McLay & Hayward 1987; Ford & Seigel 1989) and decreases with increased age at maturity. In an iteroperous annual organism, an early ma- turing female will have more opportunities to reproduce (Toft 1976, Suter 1990). Second, ju- veniles of many organisms are more at risk from 94 HIGGINS-LIFE-HISTORY PLASTICITY AND FECUNDITY 95 Table L— Characteristics of sites used, including generations per year (facultatively bivoltine in Veracruz), seasonality and annual rainfall, mean and standard deviation of prey capture rates (per 1 2 diurnal hours per spider, superscripts refer to significantly distinct groups), and relative predation rates on juveniles less than 0.5 cm t + p (Higgins in press). Climate data sources: Panama: Leigh et al. 1982; Mexico: Garcia 1973; Texas: US Meteorological Service. Prey-capture rates from Higgins and Buskirk, in press. Site Study period Voltin- ism Seasonality Rain- fall Prey capture Predation Panama 1/1985-771986 2 wet/dry 2.5 m wet: 2 (9.75)“ high dry: 1 (i.l2)'> high Veracruz 7=11/1986, 5/1987 1 warm/cold 4.5 m 2 (2.71)“ high Texas 7-8/1985, 5/1988 1 warm/cold 1.1 m 1 (0.83)*’ low predation than adults; therefore, the probability of death prior to reproduction increases with the duration of the juvenile stages (Bervin & Gill 1983; Steams 1983; fitter 1989; Higgins in press). The orb-weaving spider Nephila davipes (Lin- naeus) (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) is a broadly distributed organism (Levi 1980) with striking variation in adult female size. I anticipated that variation in female size among populations ex- isting under different conditions resulted from variation in one or several juvenile develop- mental parameters. Laboratory studies involving males of this spider have revealed food-depen- dent variation in both grov/th per instar and the number of instars before sexual maturity, con- tributing to variation in size at sexual maturity (Vollrath 1983). To investigate the developmen- tal causes of variation in female size and the environmental correlates of the developmental variation, I undertook field studies of marked individuals in three disjunct populations of N. davipes: Banro Colorado Island, Panama, coastal Veracruz, Mexico and southeastern Texas, USA. These data were combined with data concerning female fecundity in the tv/o tropical populations to document the fitness consequences of varia- tion in adult female size. Study Otgmasm.— Nephila davipes is an orb- weaving spider found from the southeastern United States to northern Argentina (Levi 1980). The spiders have one post-hatching non-feeding larval stage {sensu Foelix 1982) and molt to the first instar before emerging from the egg sac. In univoltine populations, a quiescent stage occurs in the egg sac. The spiderlings spend one or two instars together on a tangle web then disperse (Kimmel & Grant 1980; Hill & Christenson 1981). This species is highly sexually dimorphic (Levi 1 980). Mature males vary from 0.4=0. 7 cm leg I tibia + patella length. Females reach sexual maturity at a range of sizes, 0. 8=2.0 cm leg I tibia + patella length (Higgins pers. obs.). The spiders lay their egg sacs away from the orb and do not usually return, but build in a new site one or two days after laying. The phenology varies among populations, in part related to different weather patterns (pers. obs.), but no marked, free-living mature females have been observed to survive more than five months (over 200 individuals in 7 sites). Among the three populations studied, that on Barro Colorado Island, Panama, is bi- voltine with peak female abundances in the early rainy season and late-rainy to early dry season (Lubin 1978; Higgins 1988) and that in Houston, Texas, is univoltine with peak female abundance in August-Septero,ber (Higgins 1988). In Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico, the population is fac- ultatively bivoltine: there is normally only one generation per year v/ith peak female abundance in August-September (pers. obs.). Occasionally, juveniles do not enter winter quiescence and these individuals mature and reproduce in May. Study Sites.— At all sites, I studied spiders found in second growth (Texas, Panama) or pri- mary (Veracruz) forest and along edges of trails and abandoned roads. During the study, al! three sites had maximum daily temperatures of about 27 °C (Garcia 1973; Leigh, Rand& Winsor 1982; Higgins 1987). Patterns of rainfall, prey capture, and predation varied among the three popula- tions and between seasons on Barro Colorado Island (Table 1). The prey-capture rate varied with weather, and was significantly higher in Ve- racruz and the Panama rainy season than in Tex- as and the Panama dry season (Higgins & Bus- kirk in press). The frequency of predator attacks was significantly higher for small juveniles (<0.5 cm leg I tibia + patella length) within each pop- ulation and higher in the tropical populations compared to Texas (Higgins in press). 96 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Lowland Panama has a seasonal tropical cli- mate (Leigh, Rand & Winsor 1982), the dry sea- son normally lasts from January to mid-May. The southern coast of Veracruz, Mexico, has a wet tropical climate (de la Cruz & Dirzo 1987). Although there is no regular dry season, there is an unpredictable period of winter storms that combine winds, low temperatures, and rain, be- ginning between September and December and lasting two to four months. The spiders were studied in the eastern section of the biological station “Los Tuxtlas” (Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico). Galveston County, Tex- as has humid summers with little rainfall and relatively cold winters lasting from November to March (average minimum temperature 1 1 °C). The spiders were studied in scrub forest at the University of Houston Coastal Center (Higgins 1987). The seasonality of the climate in Panama resulted in replication of dry and rainy condi- tions between the three populations: Panama dry and Texas, Panama rainy and Veracruz. METHODS The data were collected through repeated ob- servations of marked individuals. Each spider was measured (leg I tibia + patella length (t + p), cm ± 2%, measured with Helios needle-nosed calipers) without removing the animal from its web. I individually marked spiders larger than 0.4 cm t + p on their legs (with “Testor’s” flat enamel (Testor Corporation, Rockford, IL61 108, USA)) and flagged their web sites. Spiders were re-marked after molting. Individuals of less than 0.4 cm t 4- p were not marked, but their web sites were flagged. Spider sex and reproductive status were categorized as: immature (indeter- minate sex), penultimate instar male, juvenile female, mature male or female. Animals larger than 0.5 cm tibia -I- patella length were assumed to be juvenile females as males rarely reach that size without showing secondary sexual charac- teristics. Mature females have heavily sclerotized external genitalia, distinguishing them from im- mature females. During the study period (Table 1 ), I visited each individual regularly (nearly dai- ly in Veracruz, Texas, and Panama in 1985; ev- ery other day in Panama in 1986) until it could no longer be found. Growth,— Growth was divided into two dis- tinct but interrelated measures: (a) growth per molt (change in t -I- p) and intermolt interval (days between molts), and (b) weight gain per unit time. Between molts, the spiders gain weight by expanding the abdomen volume. At the time of the molt, the leg length and carapace size change. Growth per molt was determined through comparison of pre- and post-molt t -I- p length. I also measured t + p of discarded exoskeletons found in the webs of recently molted spiders. The pre-molt t -I- p length was not different from the exuvia t + p length for the same individual {n = 19, paired t test = -0.46, P {2 tailed) = 0.65). Therefore, I included the length of the exuvia t + p in the analysis of growth per molt when pre- molt t + p was unknown. If an individual was observed for more than one molt, only data from the first molt were included in the analysis of growth per molt. I recorded intermolt intervals (days between molts) for individuals that were observed for more than one molt. Weight gain over 14 day intervals by females greater than 0.4 cm t -t- p was estimated in the Panama and Veracruz populations. I chose two- week intervals to reduce the variance in the rate of weight gain during the intermolt cycle (Higgins 1988). As these spiders have approximately cy- lindrical abdomens, I estimated abdomen vol- ume from abdomen length (cm) and width (cm) as: abdomen volume (cc) = (length) w (width/2)L (I found that taking these measures with calipers was less likely to cause web-site abandonment than removing the spiders from their webs to be weighed.) In Panama, I determined that the weight of a spider could be estimated as a func- tion of abdomen volume and leg I tibia + patella length: weight (g) = 0.012 + 0.081 ((t -t- p)^) + 0.784 (abdomen volume); = 0.998 (n = 86, = 17,701.29, P<0.001). Reproduction.— To evaluate the effect of fe- male size on fecundity, I collected first egg sacs from marked free-living females in Panama and Veracruz. Females observed molting to sexual maturity were marked, and only those that were followed until oviposition were included, there- by avoiding age affects in reproduction (Suter 1 990). Changes in orb-web renewal behavior sig- nal when a female is preparing to lay (Higgins 1990). I removed gravid females from the field, weighed them, and placed them in 30 x 1 5 x 70 cm cages in an insectary in Panama or a non- airconditioned laboratory in Veracruz, providing live prey if a viscid spiral was built. Most females laid eggs within 5 days of being collected, and were subsequently weighed and released. Three HIGGINS-LIFE-HISTORY PLASTICITY AND FECUNDITY 97 to five days after being laid, the egg sacs were opened and the eggs removed, weighed and counted. Whereas living eggs are yellow in color, some egg sacs contained a few grey or dried black eggs that I presumed to be infertile or dead. If more than 10 eggs were grey or black, they were counted separately and the yellow eggs were re- weighed. In these clutches, I estimated mean egg weight using only the fertile eggs. I calculated relative clutch mass (RCM) as total egg mass divided by post-laying weight of the female (Sei- gel & Fitch 1984). Post-laying rather than pre- laying weight was used to ease comparison with the data available for other spiders (McLay & Hayward 1986). Statistical Analysis.— Many of the variables collected are functions of spider size (t -h p) or weight. After checking the subsets of data from each site to assure that all had significant re- gressions, preliminary ANCOVA were run to test for significant interaction effects between the co- variate (size or weight) and the factor in question (site, generation or season). If significant inter- action effects were found, indicating significant difference in the slopes of the lines being com- pared, a regression of the entire data set was done saving the residuals; and these were analyzed with ANOVA to test for significant effects of the factor in question. If the comparison of regression lines revealed no significant interaction effect (the lines were parallel), the data were further analyzed with ANCOVA, dropping the interaction term, to de- termine if the functions had significantly differ- ent y - intercepts (Sokal & Rohlf 198 1). All anal- yses were done with SYSTAT, which uses a least- squares algorithm for ANOVA and regression analyses (Wilkinson 1987). Lastly, in biologically significant cases where the null hypothesis was not disproven, indicating similarity between groups, an a posteriori power test was calculated. This descriptive statistic gives the minimum dif- ference the test could have detected at R = 0.05, expressed as a percent of the mean value (N. Fowler, pers. comm.). RESULTS Growth,— Growth was measured as three re- lated factors: weight gain in 1 4 d intervals, leg I tibia + patella growth per molt and intermolt interval. Weight gain was compared between wet- season Panama and Veracruz; the spiders’ web- site tenacities were too low during the Panama dry season to allow observations over two week intervals. The rate of weight gain varied with size (t + p) and sexual status (immature or mature female). In juveniles of both sexes, weight gain was a log function of the spider size (t + p) at the beginning of the observation period, with no difference between sites (ANCOVA: no inter- action effect; site: Rd.io) = 2.17, R = 0.17; re- gression: In(Aweight) = - 2.34 + 2.26 (t + p), R2 = 0.626, F„,n) = 18.37, R = 0.001). Weight gain by mature females was independent of size (« = 1 1 , R^ = 0.002, ns) and a Mann-Whitney f/-test showed no difference between Panama and Veracruz {df= 1, t/ = 0.1 1, R = 0.84). Mature females gained weight at a mean rate of 1.622 g/14 d (SD = 0.806). The development of juveniles was compared by examining the pre-molt weights and the change in size (t + p) with each molt. Pre-molting ab- domen volume (an estimate of weight), pre-molt size (t + p), and post-molt size were related. The volume of the abdomen was measured on the day of the last pre-molt orb, 2-4 days before the molt (spiders cease building orbs before molting). Pre-molt abdomen volume was strongly corre- lated with the pre-molt size (t + p) of the spider and did not vary between the two tropical sites (Fig. la. ANCOVA: no interaction effect, mini- mum detectable difference = 28%. site: R,, ,7, = 0.505, R = 0.49; minimum detectable difference = 28%. Regression: (abdomen volume )'^^ = 0.07 + 0.63 (t + p), R2 = 0.89, R„,,8, = 146.0, R < 0.001). The post-molt t + p was highly correlated with the abdomen volume of the individual on the day of the last pre-molt orb and the rela- tionship did not vary between the sites (Fig. lb. ANCOVA: no interaction effect, minimum de- tectable difference = 1.9%. site: R,i,i7) = 0.41, R = 0.53; minimum detectable difference = 90%. Regression: post-molt t + p = 0.04 + 1.88 (ab- domen volume)''^- = 0.94, R,, ,8, = 286.2, R < 0.001). Intermolt interval in days was highly variable within sites and positively correlated with the spider size (Fig. 2). Comparison of Panama dry, Panama wet, Veracruz and Texas showed no sig- nificant effect of site or season (ANCOVA: n = 31. site: R(2,27) = 1-20, R = 0.32; season (Panama dry and Texas vs. Panama wet and Veracruz): R„,28, = 0.03, R= 0.86). Growth per molt was compared through the regression of post-molt size (t + p) on pre-molt size (Fig. 3). Male and female growth per molt was compared only for the Panama data set. 98 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY cube root, pre-molt abdomen volume Figure 1.— a. The relationship between pre-molt tibia -t- patella length (t -i- p) and pre-molt abdomen volume, b. The relationship between pre-molt abdomen volume and post-molt t -I- p. (O = Panama wet; □ = Veracruz). which has the largest number of observed male molts. There was no difference between male growth and juvenile and female growth (AN- COVA: no interaction effect, minimum detect- able difference = 0.8%. n = 28 males, 101 un- sexed juveniles and females; sex: F,, ,26) = 0.6, ns, minimum detectable difference = 24%). Spi- ders in the three populations exhibited two dif- ferent rates of growth per molt. The two gener- ations observed on Panama and the Veracruz population had the same growth per molt (Table 2) and these data were pooled in the final analysis as “tropical” (between sites minimum detectable slope difference = 0.60%, minimum detectable intercept difference = 1 6%). In contrast, the pop- ulation in Texas grew less per molt: the slope of the regression line was significantly lower (AN- COVA interaction term. Table 2). Analysis of the residuals revealed that the early instars were larger in Texas than in the tropics (ANOVA, post-molt tibia+patella length, cm HIGGINS -LIFE-HISTORY PLASTICITY AND FECUNDITY 99 tibia+patella Figure 2.— The intermolt interval in days plotted against tibia + patella length (t + p) for all three populations: days = 7.18 + 8.56 (t + p), n = 31, R- = 0.525, P < 0.001. (A = Veracruz; □ = Panama wet; ■ = Panama dry; A = Texas). premolt tibia+patella length Figure 3.— Pre-molt t + p vs. post-molt t + p for Texas, Panama and Veracruz. The arrows mark the mean adult female size in each population (Y). The two generations in Panama grew at the same rate (dry: y = 0.047 + 1.300 X (R2 = 0.970); wet: y = 0.050 + 1.310 x {R^ = 0.985)). The Veracruz population grew at a similar rate (y = 0.057 + 1.295 x (R^ = 0.992). The Texas spiders grew significantly less per molt (y = 0.068 + 1.183 X (R^ = 0.984)). 100 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 2.— ANCOVA of regression lines of growth per molt: Comparison between the two tropical populations shows no difference in (a) slope or (b) intercept. Comparison of the tropical populations and Texas (c) reveals significant difference in slope. Source SS df F P a. pre-molt size 41.48 1 17 342.9 <0.001 Veracruz vs. Panama (intercept) 0.001 1 0.451 0.503 interaction (effect on slope) 0.000 1 0.193 0.661 error 0.409 171 - - b. pre-molt size 42.14 1 17771.0 <0.001 Veracruz vs. Panama (intercept) 0.001 1 0.28 0.597 error 0.409 172 - - c. pre-molt size 43.71 1 6671.25 <0.001 tropical vs. Texas (intercept) 0.007 1 1.06 0.305 interaction (effect on slope) 0.075 1 11.47 0.001 error 1.61 246 - - tropical vs. Texas, n = 250, T'(i,248) = 12.30, P = 0.001), suggesting that the Texas spiders hatch at a larger size. Females matured at different mean sizes in different populations (Fig. 3, Table 3). Compar- ison of mature female t + p for the two gen- erations on Panama, Veracruz, and Texas indi- cated that the four groups were significantly different (ANOVA: .g,, = 70.7, P < 0.001). As the spiders in Panama and Veracruz grew the same amount per molt, the variation in size at maturity within these tropical populations re- flects differences in the number of juvenile in- stars. The small size of females in Texas reflects the lower growth per molt and probably also a lower number of juvenile molts. Reproduction.— Reproductive effort was mea- sured by the number of eggs and weight of the first egg sac, compared between the two tropical populations as a function of female size (t + p), pre-laying weight, and post-laying weight. In ad- dition, some free-living females were observed to lay several egg sacs (uncollected), providing an estimate of the interval between egg sacs. First egg sacs were collected from 1 5 females on Pan- ama (wet: 9 (June-September); dry: 5 (Decem- ber-January), 1 (April)). Only two first clutches were collected in Veracruz, but these were in- cluded in the analysis for comparison. The low sample size reflects the difficulty of following marked individuals from the last molt to the first oviposition in the dense Veracruz vegetation. There was no significant difference in tibia + patella length or final weight among females sam- pled between the generations on Panama. Fe- male size and final pre-laying weight were cor- related and there was an effect of site/season (Fig. 4. ANCOVA t + p: = 10.494, P = 0.008; site/season: iyj n) = 5.296, P = 0.024 (excluding the April female because of undue influence in the regression)). This reflects a relatively higher final weight for female spiders of similar tibia + patella length in Panama (June-September) com- pared to Veracruz and Panama (December-Jan- uary). Only two females laid large numbers of infer- tile eggs (3% and 5% of 1 35 1 and 1170 total eggs, respectively), one from each generation in Pan- ama. The number of good eggs and clutch weight were significantly correlated with the pre-laying weight of the females (Fig. 5) and positively cor- related with female size (regression analysis, number of eggs: slope = 956, = 0.30, iy,, ,3, = 5.50, P = 0.035; clutch weight (g): slope = 0.553, = 0.15, ,3, = 2.24, ns). There was no effect of site or season on the relationship between female size and fecundity. Nor were there differences between generations on Panama in clutch weight {n = 17, Kruskall-Wallis = 2.44, df = 2, ns) or egg number (« = 17, Kruskall- Wallis = 1.38, df = 2, ns). Relative clutch mass (RCM) was high; females laid on average 104% of their post-laying weight in eggs (range 80- 129%) (Table 3). RCM did not vary with female size or with site/season (ANCOVA: no interac- tion effect, t + p: F), ,4, = 0.74, ns; site/season: ^(2. 14) = 1-15, ns). Non-egg weight gain was es- timated by comparing estimated post-molt weight to post-laying weight for five females, four in Panama and one in Veracruz. In these females. HIGGINS- LIFE-HISTORY PLASTICITY AND FECUNDITY 101 Table 3.— Mean female size (leg I tibia + patella, t -f p) at maturity and fecundity data for first egg sacs collected in Panama and Veracruz; mean female size in Texas. RCM: relative clutch mass (=clutch mass/post- laying weight); mean egg weight considers only viable eggs (= weight of good eggs/n good eggs). * (ANOVA P < 0.001), § (Fisher PSLD P < 0.05). Generation Mean t + p (SD, n) Number of egg sacs Mean post-laying weight (SD) RCM Mean egg wt (SD) Panama June 1.57(0.14, 83)* 10 0.933 (0.26) 1.08 (0.14) 0.804 (0.06)§ Panama Dec. 1.43 (0.14, 46)* 5 0.809 (0.2) i.OI (0.15) 0.724 (0.08)§ Veracruz 1.71 (0.15, 38)* 2 1.05 0.93 0.90 Texas 1.31 (0.14, 42)* 0 - - - the weight of the eggs was equal to on average 65% of the weight gained between molting and laying; non-egg weight gain averaged 0.21 g. The mean egg weight (total weight of good eggs/number of good eggs) was variable (overall range 0.65-0.90 mg) but was not correlated with female size, female weight or total number of good eggs (regression analysis, t + p: Ty,, ,4, = 0.06, ns; weight: F(, ,4, = 1.27, ns; number of eggs: F,, ,4) = 0.01, ns). Within Panama, mean egg weight was greater in June-September clutch- es than in December-January and April clutches (Table 3; Fisher PLSD = 0.077, P < 0.05). The exact number of days between final molt and first reproduction is known for seven females in Panama and three females in Veracruz. In both populations, females laid within 30 days of the final molt (Panama, range 18-29; Veracruz, range 24-28). Observations of free living females indicate that egg sacs are laid about 20 days apart, and one free-living female in Panama laid five fertile egg sacs. E g) 'o O) £ ro I o Cl tibia+patella length, cm Figure 4.— Estimated adult female pre-laying weight vs. adult size (t + p). The slope is significantly positive, and the June-September females tend to lay at a higher weight for their size, weight = — 1.59 + 2.35 (t + p), {R^ = 0.52, n = 16; April female deleted (see text)). (A = Panama April; ▲ = Panama June-September; • = Panama December-January; □ = Veracruz). 102 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 0 12 3 o 0.05; Figs. 6 & 1 1, C/. glomosus, 1.0 mg, R = 0.59, P > 0.05; Figs. 7 & 12, immature theridiid, 1.8 mg, R = 0.49, P > 0.05. 112 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Time (s) Figure 14. — Drag generated on the surfaces of a 7.2 mg theridiid. The postures shown at three points in the graph are computer-enhanced images from individual video frames. characteristics of the surfaces of the spider itself and its silk. The relevant characteristics of the surfaces have been discussed in theory by Hum- phrey (1987), and I have discussed elsewhere (Suter 1991) their relative importances as de- duced from wind tunnel experiments. Both I and Humphrey acknowledged a role of posture in determining drag, but both of us considered its role to be secondary, Humphrey because sim- plifying assumptions needed to be made to make the calculations tractable, and I because of my use of dead spiders in the wind tunnel experi- ments. The results reported here make clear the need to reassess the role of posture in ballooning. Figures 3-7 show that individual spiders trail- ing silk sometimes fall much faster and some- times much slower than predicted. Because these large differences can occur between trials of a single spider (e.g., Figs. 3, 7), they cannot be attributed to differences in morphology. All of the silk used by the spiders was dragline, the structure of which is known and relatively in- variant (Suter 1991), so that the differences in velocities cannot be attributed to variations in silk structure either. Finally, although silk length is sometimes a significant component in the de- termination of terminal velocity (Figs. 8, 9), it by no means acts alone: even at a single silk length in an individual spider, terminal velocity can vary by a factor of 2.6 (e.g., Fig. 10: at 5 cm, 78 vs. 29 cm/s). This variability must arise, therefore, from the single uncontrolled variable in this system, the posture of the falling spider relative to the direction of motion. The influence of posture on the drag developed by a spider in a moving air stream is clearly evident in Figs. 13, 14. Even what appears to be a small change, pulling the legs tightly to the body from a posture where the legs are slightly more loosely held, can result in a reduction in drag of 0.17 at a very low air velocity (0.07 m/s), and that is for a spider with a weight of 1 .76 nN. At much higher air velocities like those reached by a falling spider of the same size (e.g., from Fig. 3, 50 cm/s), the effect of this postural change would be much greater [using Equation 4 from Suter ( 1 99 1 ), the reduction in drag due to a com- parable postural change at 50 cm/s would be 1 . 1 9 mN] and would easily account for the terminal velocity differences seen in Figs. 8-12. SUTER- BALLOONING: POSTURE AND TERMINAL VELOCITY 113 The importance of posture as an influence on terminal velocity in ballooning spiders must, of course, vary with the amount of silk that is used: when a spider uses only a short length of silk, the influence of posture will be greater than when silk is very long and little of the drag on the silk/ spider system is developed by the spider’s body and appendages. Unfortunately, almost nothing is known about the amount of silk actually used by ballooning spiders. That absence of data means that the importance of posture in the travels of ballooning spiders (even in their ability to con- trol their elevation) cannot yet be assessed. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to Katherine J. Suter who as- sisted in the data collection, to William G. Eber- hard and Matthew H. Greenstone for their crit- ical readings of the manuscript, and to Fernando Nottebohm who generously provided me with both laboratory and office space at The Rocke- feller University Field Research Center, Mill- brook, N. Y. The work reported here was sup- ported in part by an equipment grant from the Beadle Fund of Vassar College. LITERATURE CITED Coyle, F. A., M. A. Greenstone, A. L. Hultsch & C. E. Morgan. 1985. Ballooning mygalomorphs: esti- mates of the masses of Sphodros and Ummidia bal- looners (Araneae: Atypidae, Ctenizidae). J. Arach- nol., 13:291-296. Dean, D. A., & W. L. Sterling. 1985. Size and phe- nology of ballooning spiders at two locations in east- ern Texas, USA. J. Arachnol., 13:1 1 1-120. Eberhard, W. G. 1987. How spiders initiate airborne lines. J. Arachnol., 15:1-9. Greenstone, M. H., C. E. Morgan & A. L. Hultsch. 1985. Spider ballooning: development and evalu- ation of field trapping methods (Araneae). J. Arach- nol., 13:337-345. Greenstone, M. H., C. E. Morgan, A. L. Hultsch, R. A. Farrow &J. E. Dowse. 1987. Ballooning spiders in Missouri, USA and New South Wales, Australia: family and mass distributions. J. Arachnol., 15:163- 170. Humphrey, J. A. C. 1987. Fluid mechanic constraints on spider ballooning. Oecologia, 73:469-477. Richter, C. J. J. 1970. Aerial dispersal in relation to habitat in eight wolf spider species {Pardosa, Ara- neae, Lycosidae). Oecologia, 5:200-214. Suter, R. B. 1991. Ballooning in spiders: results of wind tunnel experiments. Ethol. Ecol. & Evol., 3: 13-25. Vogel, S. 1981. Life in Moving Fluids. Willard Grant Press, Boston. Vugts, H. V., & W. K. R. E. Van Wingerden. 1976. Meteorological aspects of aeronautic behavior of spiders. Oikos, 27:433-444. Manuscript received December 1991, revised February 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:1 14-128 A REVISION OF SOME SPECIES OF RONCUS L. KOCH (NEOBISIIDAE, PSEUDOSCORPIONES) FROM NORTH AMERICA AND SOUTH EUROPE Bozidar P. M. Curcic, Rajko N. Dimitnjevic, and Ozren S. Karamata: Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Science (Biology), University of Belgrade, Studentski Trg 16, 1 1000 Beograd, Yugoslavia. ABSTRACT. The available material of the species Roncus lubricus L. Koch, 1873, from North America and South Europe has been studied. It was concluded that specimens of R. lubricus from the United States belong to the nominal subspecies. Furthermore, it is assumed that the USA populations of this subspecies were probably introduced by human activity. A new subspecies, R. lubricus pannonius, from Yugoslavia is described. A key to the subspecies of R. lubricus is presented. An analysis of the available type material from the collection of J. Hadzi has supported the elevation of two of his subspecies to full specific rank: Roncus tenuis Hadzi, 1933, new status, and R. dalmatinus Hadzi, 1933, new status, both from northern Dalmatia, Y ugoslavia. These two species were formerly regarded as subspecies of R. lubricus, but this study revealed that they are not members of the R. lubricus group (since they both lack microsetae proximal to eb and esb). Both species are considered endemics to the Balkan Peninsula. Most diagnostic characters of the analyzed taxa are thoroughly described or figured. Some taxonomic interrelationships and features of geographic distribution have been also The genus Roncus was established in 1873 by L. Koch for three new species. The first included species, R. lubricus, was subsequently designated as the type species (Beier 1 932). The systematics of the genus is very poorly known. Setation and morphometric characters are usually employed, but they may be useful to distinguish between endemic or cave-inhabiting species. A relative “homogeneity” of these characters in most epi- gean species does not permit their use for taxo- nomic purposes (Gardini 1981, 1983). The so- called “i?. lubricus" in fact represents a hetero- geneous group of taxa widely distributed in west- ern Europe and the northern Mediterranean re- gion. Therefore, a thorough analysis of different members of this group seems necessary in order to establish sound criteria for delimiting the tax- onomic status of different populations of “i?. lu- bricus". Of the two existing type specimens of each sex, Gardini (1983) designated and rede- scribed the male of R. lubricus from Bloxworth, United Kingdom, as the lectotype. Both speci- mens are deposited in the collection of Rev. O. Pickard-Cambridge in the University Museum at Oxford. A full account of the external mor- phology of R. lubricus from near Henley-on- Thames, UK, was presented by Gabbutt & Va- chon ( 1 967). Muchmore ( 1 969) collected a num- ber of R. lubricus specimens from Rochester, briefly discussed. N.Y., USA. In 1981, one of us (BPMC) also ob- tained a sample of the same species from the USA, but from Cambridge, Massachusetts. Ad- ditionally, we collected a number of specimens of R. lubricus or of populations that were con- sidered as closely related to this species (Curcic 1982, 1991; Poinar & Curcic, 1992), from Mt. Avala and the village of Obrez, both near Bel- grade, Yugoslavia (southeastern Europe). In ad- dition, we analyzed four of the type specimens of Roncus lubricus tenuis Hadzi, 1933, and R. lubricus dalmatinus Hadzi, 1933, (two of each subspecies) in order to verify their taxonomic status. Both “subspecies” inhabit the northern Mediterranean region. The aim of this study was to verify precisely the taxonomic position (status) of some North American and South European representatives assigned to R. lubricus, including those of the type series of Hadzi’s two subspecies; to con- tribute to the knowledge of variation between and among different populations of R. lubricus-, and to analyze their geographical distribution in North America and South Europe. METHODS The samples from Rochester, Cambridge (USA), and Obrez (Yugoslavia) were collected by hand, by sifting leaf-litter and humus, or by 114 CURCIC ET AL.- REVISION OF SOME RONCUS SPECIES 115 Tullgren extractions from leaf litter and soil. Af- ter collecting, all specimens were preserved in 70% alcohol with 5% glycerine added. The ac- cessible type specimens of R. lubricus tenuis and R. lubricus dalmatinus from Hadzi’s collection (now in our possession) have been subjected to redescription and further analysis. Measure- ments (Tables 1-3) have been made in accor- dance with Chamberlin (1 93 1) and Curcic (1 982, 1988), and the drawings in accordance with Cur- cic (1982, 1988). NEOBISIIDAE CHAMBERLIN, 1930 Roncus lubricus lubricus L. Koch, 1873 (Figs. 1-15; Table 1) Specimens examined.— USA: Massachusetts: Cam- bridge, 4 males, 8 females, and 1 tritonymph (collected from leaf litter and humus on the grounds of the Amer- ican Academy of Arts and Sciences), 18 July 1981 (B. P. M. Curcic and P. S. Petrovic); New York: Monroe Co., Rochester, 8 males and 6 females, (collected from leaf litter and soil along base of wall shaded by syca- more tree), 24 September 1967 (W. B. Muchmore). Description. — Carapace somewhat longer than broad (Fig. 1; Table 1). Epistome triangular and pointed or apically blunt (Figs. 2, 3). Eyes well developed. Anterior row with 4, ocular with 5- 7, median and intermedian rows each with 6-8, and posterior row with 6 (rarely 5) setae. Tergite I with 6 or 7 setae, tergite II with 8-1 1 setae, and tergites III-X each with 9-13 setae. Male genital area; stemite II with a cluster of 1 4- 19 setae; of these, 8-10 longer setae on the pos- terior sternal margin and the remainder in the median and posterior region, thinning out an- teriorly. Stemite III with 5-7 anterior and me- dian setae, 9-1 1 posterior setae, and 3 supras- tigmal microsetae on each side. Female genital area: stemite II with a cluster of 9-15 setae in form of an irregular triangle or circle; stemite III with a transverse row of 1 1-15 posterior setae, and 3 small setae along each stigma. Trito- nymph: stemite II with 2 setae only, stemite III with 9 setae, and 2 or 3 microsetae along each stigma. On stemite IV, three microsetae along each stigmatic plate in both adults and trito- nymph. Stemite IV with 7 (tritonymph) or 10- 15 setae (adult); stemites V-X each with 11-15 setae. From stemite VII onwards, 2 median setae slightly anterior to the row of marginal setae. Cheliceral spinneret (galea) as a low hyaline con- vexity (Fig. 4), slightly less prominent in males than in females or tritonymph. Cheliceral palm with 6 setae in both sexes and tritonymph, mov- able finger with one seta. Fixed cheliceral finger with 15-17 small teeth diminishing in size both distally and proximally. Movable cheliceral fin- ger with 10-13 teeth (Fig. 4). Flagellum with 1 short proximal blade and 7 longer blades distally. Apex of pedipalpal coxa with 4 long, acuminate setae. Pedipalpal trochanter with two small lat- eral tubercles and with inconspicuous granula- tions dorsally; femur with a single lateral tuber- cle, granulation as in Figs. 12, 13, 15. Tibia smooth. Chelal palm with some inconspicuous granulations (Figs. 12, 13, 15); a group of 1 to 4 microsetae proximal to trichobothria eb and esb (Figs. 9-1 1); a single tubercle on laterodistal side. Fixed chelal finger with 57-64 (female), 59-68 (male), and 40 teeth (tritonymph); distal teeth asymmetrical, followed by small, close-set, and retroconical teeth. Movable chelal linger with 57- 62 female), 57-68 (male), and 42 teeth (trito- nymph); only distal teeth pointed and retrocon- ical, and these becoming rounded or square- cusped teeth which extend as far as the level of b. Sensillum between 1 6th and 22nd (male), be- tween 12th and 20th (female), or at level of 1 1th tooth (tritonymph). Sensillum in male is either distal to or at level of sb\ in female, slightly prox- imal to, distal to, or at the level of sb; and in tritonymph, slightly proximal to st. Chelal fingers longer than chelal palm and slightly shorter than or equal to pedipalpal femur (Table 1). Pedipalpal femur length almost equal to carapacal length (Table 1). Trichobothriotaxy: ist somewhat closer to est than to isb-, sb equi- distant from b and st (Figs. 5-7). Trichobothrial pattern of tritonymph as in Fig. 8. (Trichoboth- riotaxy almost identical to R. lubricus from the UK (Gabbutt & Vachon 1967)). Trochanteral foramen pointed and sclerotized. Tibia IV, ba- sitarsus IV, and telotarsus IV each with a long tactile seta (Fig. 14). Tactile seta ratios, mor- phometric ratios and linear measurements are given in Table 1. Distribution. — It is still impossible to outline the true distribution of Roncus lubricus (Gardini 1983). Gardini suggested that in Europe this spe- cies may be widespread in the United Kingdom, France, and Belgium. In North America, R. lu- bricus is distributed in the eastern United States. Its presence in New York and Massachusetts supports the assumption that it is a permanent inhabitant of these regions. The findings of sub- adult stages in the localities analyzed (Muchmore 1969) strongly confirm its ecological adaptability 116 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures \-i.—Roncus lubricus lubricus L. Koch, 1873, from Cambridge, Mass., USA: 1, carapace, male; 2, epistome, male; 3, epistome, tritonymph; 4, cheliceral fingers, female; 5, pedipalpal chela, male; 6, pedipalpal chela, male; 7, pedipalpal chela, female; 8, pedipalpal chela, tritonymph. Scales in mm. as well as the presence of fully established life cycle. Interrelationships of R. lubricus from North America and Great Britain.— The comparison of measurements of various structures of R. lubri- cus from the United States with the data pre- sented by Gabbutt & Vachon (1967) and Gardini (1983) for British specimens yielded some inter- esting observations. North American specimens show some minor differences in a number of linear measurements and linear measurements and morphometric ratios. However, some more important differences have been noted in a num- ber of characters, including the ratio of chelal finger length to the chelal palm length which is 1.33=1.43 (females), 1.31-1.57 (males), and 1.29- 1 .47 (tritonymph) for UK specimens, as opposed to 1.08-1.29 (females), 1.16-1.345 (males), and 1.19 (tritonymph) for US specimens; and the of pedipalpal tibial length to breadth is 1.83-2.14 for females from the UK, as opposed to 2.14- 2.33 for US females. However, the majority of other morphometric characters are close or iden- tical. Some slight differences between specimens from UK and US are also manifested in the form of pedipalpal articles; in general, the body size and proportions of different structures are some- what greater in US specimens. The noted small distinctions in setation and other characters CURCIC ET AL.-REVISION OF SOME RONCUS SPECIES 117 Figures 9-\5.—Roncus lubricus lubricus L. Koch, 1873, from Cambridge, Mass., USA: 9, microsetae proximal to eb and esb, male; 1 0, microsetae proximal to eb and esb, male; 1 1 , microsetae proximal to b and esb, tritonymph; 12, pedipalp, female; 13, pedipalp, male; 14, leg IV, male; 15, pedipalp, tritonymph. Scales in mm. Table 1.— Linear measurements (in mm) and morphometric ratios in Roncus lubricus lubricus L. Koch from the US. Character Females Males Trito. Body Length (1) 1.75-1.94 1.84-2.995 1.97 Cephalothorax Length (2) 0.56-0.73 0.62-4).74 0.46 Breadth 0.51-0.63 0.52-0.63 0.445 Abdomen Length 1.03-2.29 1.17-2.33 1.51 Breadth 0.69-1.23 0.62-1.03 0.82 Cheiicerae Length (3) 0.39-0.46 0.38-0.41 0.28 Breadth (4) 0.20-0.24 0.18-0.23 0.16 Length of movable finger (5) 0.26-0.32 0.25-0.29 0.20 Length of galea 0.01 0.01 0.003 Pedipalps Length with coxa (6) 3.15-3.66 3.10-3.605 2.17 Ratio 6/1 1.10-2.03 1.08-1.81 1.10 Length of coxa 0.49-0.58 0.47-0.555 0.35 Length of trochanter 0.38-0.46 0.38-0.44 0.27 Length of femur (7) 0.46-0.74 0.63-4).73 0.43 Breadth of femur (8) 0.17-0.22 0.165-0.195 0.14 Ratio 7/8 3.285-4.00 3.46-4.29 3.07 Ratio 7/2 0.945-1.14 0.93-1.11 0.93 Length of tibia (9) 0.50-0.57 0.50-0.59 0.33 Breadth of tibia (10) 0.22-0.255 0.21-0.24 0.16 Ratio 9/10 2.14-2.33 2.22-2.46 2.06 Length of chela (11) 1.11-1.34 1.10-1.30 0.79 Breadth of chela (12) 0.31^.37 0.30-0.36 0.22 Ratio 11/12 3.35-3.72 3.50-4.07 3.59 Length of chelal palm ( 1 3) 0.51-0.61 0.48-0.58 0.36 Ratio 13/12 1.53-1.68 1.60-1.77 1.64 Length of chelal finger (14) 0.59-0.74 0.62-0.74 0.43 Ratio 14/13 1.08-1.29 1.16-1.345 1.19 Leg IV Total length 2.18-2.53 2.205-2.495 1.57 Length of coxa 0.32-0.42 0.36-0.425 0.25 Length of trochanter ( 1 5) 0.26-0.315 0.27-0.31 0.18 Breadth of trochanter ( 1 6) 0.12-0.16 0.12-0.14 0.10 Ratio 15/16 1.93-2.42 2.14-2.38 1.80 Length of femur (17) 0.58-0.67 0.55-0.62 0.41 Breadth of femur (18) 0.20-0.23 0.185-0.23 0.13 Ratio 17/18 2.55-3.12 2.695-3.08 3.15 Length of tibia (19) 0.47-0.60 0.50-0.58 0.34 Breadth of tibia (20) 0.09-4). 12 0.10-0.12 0.10 Ratio 19/20 4.58-5.555 4.83-5.40 3.40 Length of basi tarsus (21) 0.185-0.21 0.18-0.21 0.14 Breadth of basitarsus (22) 0.07-0.09 0.07-0.08 0.06 Ratio 21/22 2.28-2.86 2.375-2.67 2.33 Length of telotarsus (23) 0.31-0.38 0.32-0.37 0.25 Breadth of telotarsus (24) 0.07-0.085 0.06-0.075 0.065 Ratio 23/24 4.00-5.43 5.14-5.67 3.85 TS ratio— tibia IV 0.56-0.64 0.50-0.62 0.59 TS ratio— basitarsus IV 0.17-0.25 0.17-0.20 0.275 TS ratio— telotarsus IV 0.34-0.41 0.34-0.43 0.39 CURCIC ET AL.- REVISION OF SOME RONCUS SPECIES 119 should be treated as the result of intraspecific variability. One more item should be mentioned here — the trans- Atlantic distribution of R. lu- bricus. The explanation for such a distributional pattern was presented elsewhere by Muchmore (1969). This author suggested that the presence of this species in the United States may be due to its recent introduction by human activity. Rmcus lubricus pannonius, new subspecies (Figs. 16-30; Table 2) aff. lubricus L. Koch, 1873; Curcic 1991:165. Etymology.— After Pannonii (sing. Pannon- ius), a group of Illyrian people, inhabiting Pan- nonia, the territory in the Save Valley (Divkovic 1987); the type locality of this subspecies is lo- cated in the Pannonian Plain. Specimens examined.— Holotype male, allotype fe- male, 9 paratype males, and 5 paratype females, from the village of Obrez, near Belgrade, Serbia, Yugoslavia, collected from leaf litter and humus in an oak forest, over a period from May 1989 to September 1990 (B. P. M. Curcic, R. N. Dimitrijevic, O. S. Karamata and L. R. Lucic); deposited in the collections of the Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Belgrade, Belgrade. Description. — Epistome triangular, apically pointed (Figs. 18, 19, 21). Eyes with flattened lenses. Setal formulae: 4-I-6 + 2 + 4-I-2 + 6 = 24, and 4 + 6 + 2 + 3 + 2-1-6 = 23 setae (the latter disposition of setae present in only one specimen of each sex). Tergite I with 6 or 7 setae, tergite II with 7- 1 1 setae, the subsequent tergites (III-X) each with 8-12 setae. Male genital area: stemite II with a cluster of 14-21 setae; of these, 9-12 longer setae are found along the posterior sternal margin and remainder are smaller and thinning out anteri- orly. Stemite III with 4—8 anterior and median setae, 8-12 posterior setae and 3 (rarely 2, 4, or 5 ) microsetae along each stigma. Stemite IV with 3 (rarely 2 or 4) suprastigmal microsetae on ei- ther side and 8-1 1 posterior setae. Female genital area: stemite II with 7-14 small setae arranged in form of two barely distinguishable groups; stemite III with a transverse row of 10-14 setae and 3 suprastigmal microsetae on each side. Ster- nite IV with a row of 8-10 posterior setae and 3 microsetae along each stigma. Stemites V-X each with 12-16 setae. Setae on stemites VII-X ar- ranged in transverse rows, with no anterior and median setae present. The cheliceral spinneret (galea) as a low hya- line convexity, slightly more prominent in fe- males than in males. Cheliceral palm with 6 (in both sexes), and the movable finger with only 1 seta. Fixed cheliceral finger with 18-23 small teeth; movable cheliceral finger with 12-17 teeth (Fig. 21). Flagellum with 1 short proximal blade and 7 longer blades distally, all blades denticu- late. Apex of pedipalpal coxa with 4 long setae. Pedipalpal trochanter with 2 small lateral tuber- cles and some inconspicuous denticulations dor- sally, pedipalpal femur with a small lateral tu- bercle and distinct granulations as in Figs. 29, 30. Tibia with some rare and inconspicuous el- evations interiorly and laterally, or smooth. Che- lal palm with distinct granulations interolaterally and small and almost flattened elevations on its exterolateral side. A patch of 1-4 microsetae present proximal to eb and esb] also, 1-6 addi- tional microsetae developed lateral and distal to eb and esb. A tiny tubercle present on laterodistal side of chelal palm. Fixed chelal finger with 55- 63 (male), and 52-63 teeth (female); distal teeth of this finger are pointed and asymmetrical, fol- lowed by small, close-set, and retroconical teeth. Movable chelal finger with 57-63 (male) or 51- 64 teeth (female); only distal teeth pointed and retroconical, these gradually give way to rounded or square-cusped teeth which stretch as far as the level of b. Sensillum distal to sb, between 17th and 24th tooth (male), or between 1 5th and 22nd tooth (female). Chelal fingers longer than chelal palm and slightly shorter than pedipalpal femur. Pedipalpal femur slightly shorter than carapace (Table 2). Trichobothriotaxy: ist slightly closer to est than to isb, sb slightly closer to b than to si (Figs. 22- 24). Tibia IV, basitarsus IV, and telotarsus IV each with a single tactile seta (Fig. 28). Tactile seta ratios, morphometric ratios and linear mea- surements are presented in Table 2. Distribution.— Yugoslavia (Pannonian Plain), epigean (in humus and leaf litter). Interrelationships of R. lubricus pannonius and the nominal subspecies.— As far as the morpho- metric ratios and linear measurements are con- cerned, the new subspecies can be easily distin- guished from the nominal subspecies (inhabiting western Europe and North America). In spite of the fact that the majority of these characters are either very close in both subspecies, or their val- ues overlap, there exist a number of features which are distinct in both subspecies. For instance, the carapacal length in R. lubricus lubricus (the val- 120 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 16 17 Figures \(y-2A.—Roncus lubrkus pannonius n. ssp., from Obrez, near Belgrade, Yugoslavia: 16, carapace, male; 17, carapace, female; 18, epistome, male; 19, epistome, male; 20, epistome, female; 21, cheliceral fingers, female; 22, pedipalpal chela, male; 23, pedipalpal chela, male; 24, pedipalpal chela, female. Scales in mm. CURCIC ET AL.- REVISION OF SOME RONCUS SPECIES 121 0,1 I I Figures 25-30. — Romchs lubricus pannonius n. ssp., from Obrez, near Belgrade, Yugoslavia: 25, microsetae proximal to b and esb, male; 26, microsetae proximal to eb and esb, male; 27, microsetae proximal to eb and esb, female; 28, leg IV, male; 29, pedipalp, female; 30, pedipalp, male. Scales in mm. Table 2.— Linear measurements (in mm) and morphometric ratios in Roncus lubricus pannonius new sub- species from Yugoslavia. Character Females Males Body Length (1) 2.73-3.66 2.48-3.06 Cephalothorax Length (2) 0.72-0.88 0.72-0.81 Breadth 0.60-0.69 0.58-0.63 Abdomen Length 1.99-2.78 1.85-2.40 Breadth 0.75-1.10 0.82-1.17 Chelicerae Length (3) 0.445-0.50 0.42-0.46 Breadth (4) 0.23-0.25 0.205-0.23 Length of movable finger (5) 0.315-0.36 0.29-0.315 Length of galea 0.01 0.01 Pedipalps Length with coxa (6) 3.65^.015 3.51-3.89 Ratio 6/1 1.10-1.40 1.15-1.455 Length of coxa 0.58-0.63 0.50-0.60 Length of trochanter 0.425-0.47 0.42-0.47 Length of femur (7) 0.72-0.80 0.69-0.795 Breadth of femur (8) 0.21-0.24 0.21-0.23 Ratio 7/8 3.13-3.52 3.26-3.785 Ratio 7/2 0.91-1.04 0.925-1.09 Length of tibia (9) 0.60-0.675 0.59-0.66 Breadth of tibia ( 1 0) 0.25-0.30 0.27-0.29 Ratio 9/10 2.10-2.44 2.185-2.37 Length of chela (11) 1.28-1.44 1.26-1.41 Breadth of chela (12) 0.38-0.45 0.37-0.41 Ratio 11/12 2.93-3.37 3.191-3.51 Length of chelal palm (13) 0.59-0.69 0.57-0.665 Ratio 13/12 1.38-1.55 1.46-1.62 Length of chelal finger ( 1 4) 0.69-0.75 0.68-0.745 Ratio 14/13 1.09-1.17 1.12-1.28 Leg IV Total length 2.67-2.84 2.56-2.775 Length of coxa 0.43-0.48 0.40-0.49 Length of trochanter (15) 0.32-0.36 0.29-0.34 Breadth of trochanter (16) 0.15-0.18 0.15-0.17 Ratio 15/16 1.89-2.19 1.88-2.27 Length of femur ( 1 7) 0.69-0.74 0.66-0.72 Breadth of femur ( 1 8) 0.25-0.26 0.22-0.26 Ratio 17/18 2.73-2.92 2.64-3.045 Length of tibia (19) 0.62-0.64 0.59-0.68 Breadth of tibia (20) 0.12-0.14 0.12-0.14 Ratio 19/20 4.57-5.17 4.615-5.58 Length of basitarsus (2 1 ) 0.22-0.23 0.21-0.25 Breadth of basitarsus (22) 0.09-0.10 0.08-0.09 Ratio 21/22 2.20-2.555 2.33-2.875 Length of telotarsus (23) 0.38-0.40 0.34-0.38 Breadth of telotarsus (24) 0.08 0.075-0.08 Ratio 23/24 4.75-5.00 4.25-4.93 TS ratio— tibia IV 0.505-0.60 0.51-0.63 TS ratio— basitarsus IV 0.15-0.21 0.18-0.205 TS ratio- telotarsus IV 0.37-0.40 0.35-0.48 CURCIC ET AL.- REVISION OF SOME RONCUS SPECIES 123 ues for R. lubricus pannonius n. ssp. are enclosed in parentheses) is 0.56-0.73 mm for females, and 0.56-0.74 mm for males (0.72-0.88 mm and 0.72-0.8 1 mm); the cheliceral length is 0.37-0.46 mm for females and 0.34-0.41 mm for males (0.445-0.50 mm and 0.42-0.47 mm); the pedi- palpal tibia length is 0.45-0.57 mm in females and 0.50-0.59 mm in males (0.60-0.675 mm and 0.59-0.66 mm); the chelal palm breadth is 0.27- 0.37 mm in females and 0.27-0.36 mm in males (0.38-0.45 mm and 0.37-0.41 mm), etc. In gen- eral, the appendages and other body structures in R. lubricus pannonius n. ssp. are larger than in the nominal subspecies. Apart from these morphometric distinctions, there exist some qualitative differences between the two subspecies, such as those manifested in the disposition of some trichobothria on both fixed and movable chelal fingers. For example, in R. lubricus lubricus, the trichobothrium ist is equidistant from est and isb, while in R. lubricus pannonius n. ssp. it is slightly closer to est than to isb. Furthermore, sb is equidistant from st and b in the nominal subspecies, while in R. lubricus pannonius n. ssp. it is closer to b than to st. Interestingly enough, it is obvious that R. lu- bricus pannonius n. ssp. belongs to the Balkan endemic and relict fauna. The presence of this form, as well as of some other non-cavemicolous endemics (Curcic, in press), supports the fact that the endemic differentiation in the Balkans has been taking place not only in subterranean (Cur- cic 1988) but also in epigean habitats. KEY TO THE SUBSPECIES OF RONCUS LUBRICUS 1. Trichobothrium ist equidistant from est and isb, and sb equidistant from st and b. Pedi- palpal tibial length 0.45-0.57 mm (females) and 0.50-0.59 mm (males). Western Europe and North America R. lubricus lubricus Trichobothrium ist closer to est than to isb, and sb closer to b than to st. Pedipalpal tibial length 0.60-0.675 mm (females) and 0.59- 0.66 mm (males). Southeastern Europe . . . R. lubricus pannonius, n. ssp. Roncus tenuis Hadzi, new status (Figs. 31-41; Table 3) Roncus (Roncus) lubricus tenuis H&dii, 1933:166-170. Specimens examined.— The type series consists of two specimens (one of each sex); neither of these was designated as the holotype by Hadzi (1933). Therefore, we hereby designate the syntype male as the lectotype and the syntype female as a paralectotype. The lecto- type is mounted on a slide with the label “Roncus, 6 Malinska, 1929”. The paralectotype is mounted on a separate slide and labelled “Roncus (Roncus), 9 17. IV 1927, under stone, Malinska”. This locality is situated on the Island of Krk, in the northern Adriatic region (Dalmatia), Yugoslavia. Description.— Epistome tubercular (Fig. 33) or triangular (Fig. 34). Eyes with almost flattened lenses (Figs. 31, 32). Setal formulae: 4 + 6 + 2 + 4 + 2 + 6 = 24 and 4 + 6 + 4 + 2 + 6 = 22. Tergites I-X bearing 6-10-1 1-1 1-10-10-10- 10-10-9 and 6-8-10-10-1 1-12-10-1 1-1 1-9 se- tae. Male genital area: stemite II with 1 8 median and posterior setae; of these, 10 setae along pos- terior sternal margin and the remainder (8 setae) medial, thinning out anteriorly. Stemite III with 3 or 4 microsetae on each side, 3 anterior and median setae, and a transverse row of 1 0 setae. Female genital area: stemite II with 7 small me- dian and posterior setae of irregular distribution. Stemite III with 9 posterior setae and 3 micro- setae along each stigma. Cheliceral spinneret low and flattened, but somewhat more prominent in female than in male (Figs. 35, 36). Fixed cheli- ceral finger with 15-18 small teeth. Movable cheliceral finger with 1 1 or 1 2 teeth. Fixed chel- iceral finger with 6, movable finger with 1 seta. Flagellum with 1 short proximal blade and 7 or 8 longer blades distally. Apex of pedipalpal coxa of the lectotype with 4 long setae (the paralec- totype has 3 setae on the right, and 4 on the left apex). Pedipalpal trochanter with a small tuber- cle and some inconspicuous denticulations dor- sally (Figs. 39, 40). Pedipalpal femur with an extero-lateral tubercle and an intero-basal tu- bercle; surface with granulations on its intero- lateral side. Tibia tulip-shaped and smooth. Che- lal palm with interior and lateral granulations (Figs. 39, 40). Fixed chelal finger with 52-54 teeth, and movable finger with 55-56 teeth. Only distal teeth on the latter finger retroconical and point- ed; these gradually merging into rounded or square-cusped teeth which reach the level of b. The patch of microsetae proximal to eb and esb absent; a single tubercle on laterodistal side of chelal palm evident. Sensillum at the level of 1 3th (male) or 1 8th tooth (female), either prox- imal (male) or distal to sb (female). Chelal palm ovate (dorsal view). Chelal fingers only slightly longer than (male) or equal to chelal palm (female), but shorter than pedipalpal femur (Table 3). Pedipalpal femur length almost equal to carapacal length (Table 3). Disposition of tri- Figures 31 -4 tenuis Hadzi, new status, from Malinska, Yugoslavia: 31, carapace, male; 32, carapace, female; 33, epistome, male; 34, epistome, female; 35, cheliceral fingers, female; 36, cheliceral fingers, male; 37, pedipalpal chela, female; 38, leg IV, female; 39, pedipalp, male; 40, pedipalp, female; 41, pedipalpal chela, male. Scales in mm. CURCIC ET AL.-- REVISION OF SOME RONCUS SPECIES 125 chobothria: ist slightly closer to est than to isb (or equidistant from these); seta sb equidistant from b and st. The trichobothrial pattern as in Figs. 37, 41. Trochanteral foramen pointed and heavily sclerotized. Tibia IV, basitarsus IV, and telotarsus IV each with a single tactile seta (Fig. 38). Tactile seta ratios are presented in Table 3. Morphometric ratios and linear measurements are presented in Table 3. Distribution.— This species seems to be re- stricted to the northern Adriatic region in Yu- goslavia. To date, it is known from its type lo- cality only (Malinska, Island of Krk). Interrelationships of E. tenuis and R.. lubri- cas.— There is no doubt that R. tenuis should be given full specific rank. The differences between R. tenuis and R. lubricus are clearly manifested in many morphometric ratios and linear mea- surements (see Tables 1, 3). Furthermore, the two species differ in the presence/absence of a patch of microsetae proximal to eb and esb (pres- ent in lubricus, absent in tenuis), in the form of the pedipalpal articles (attenuated in lubricus, stout in tenuis), in the presence/absence of an intero-basal tubercle on pedipalpal femur (pres- ent in tenuis, absent in lubricus), in the form of the epistome (small and tubercular in tenuis, long and triangular in lubricus), in the ratio of chelal finger length to chelal palm length (lower in ten- uis, higher in lubricus), and in body size (smaller in tenuis, greater in lubricus). A thorough analysis of the external morphol- ogy and biogeography of both taxa suggests that R. tenuis does not belong to the R. lubricus group of species (m'hose members have microsetae proximal to eb and esb). It seems that this species belongs to another species group, whose origin is derived from the eastern Mediterranean or Balkanic pseudoscorpion fauna. Roncus dalmatinus Hadzi, new status (Figs. 42-50; Table 3) Roncus (Roncus) lubricus dalmatinus Hadzi, 1933: 1 70- 175. Specimens examined.— According to Hadzi (1933), the type series of this taxon consisted of “specimens” collected in Omisalj on the Island of Krk, and in Split (Meje), both in Yugoslavia. We have studied two males from the type series, both from Split, Mt. Maqan (Meje). These specimens are the only available syntypes. They are both mounted on a slide labelled '‘Obisium {Ron- cus) lubricus, Split-Maijan, in the vicinity of the pen- sion "Split", Meje, 28.10-14. IV 1927”. The other type specimens, if any, seem to be lost or damaged. There- fore, we hereby designate the male specimen labelled “ 1 ” as the lectotype and the male labelled “2” as the paralectotype of this taxon. Description. — Epistome triangular and point- ed (Figs. 47, 48). Eyes small and with almost flattened lenses (Figs. 42, 43). Setal formulae: 4 -i-6-l-2-i-4 + 2 + 7 = 25 and 4 + 6 + 2 + 4 + 2 + 8 = 26. Tergite I with 6-10 setae, the following tergites (III-X) each with 10-13 setae (mostly 1 1). Male genital area: stemite II with 15-17 median and posterior setae; of these, 10 longer setae along posterior sternal margin and the remainder me- dial and posteriorad, thinning out anteriorly. Stemite III with 3 small setae along each stigma, 3-5 anterior and median setae and 9 or 10 pos- terior setae. Stemite IV with 10 posterior setae and 3 small setae along each stigmatic plate. Fe- male genital area: unknown. However, according to Hadzi (1933), stemite II of the female with 1 3 small median and posterior setae, and stemite III v/ith 3 suprastigmatic setae on each side and a posterior row of 14 setae; stemite IV with a row of 9 setae and 3 small setae along each stig- ma. Unfortunately, this female specimen was not available, due to its probable loss or destruction. In males, stemites IV-X each v/ith 12-15 setae (mostly 13). Cheliceral spinneret (galea) low and flattened (Fig. 44). Fixed cheliceral finger with 18, and movable finger with 1 5 small teeth. Flagellum of 8 or 9 blades, with 1 or 2 short proximal blades and 7 longer blades distally (Fig. 49). Apex of pedipalpal coxa (manducatory pro- cess) with 4 long setae. Pedipalpal trochanter with a small tubercle and inconspicuous denticula- tions dorsally (Figs. 46, 50). Pedipalpal femur with an extero-lateral tubercle and a pair of in- terior and basal prominent tubercles; surface of this podomere granulated interiorly and dorsally (Figs. 46, 50). Pedipalpal tibia elongated and tu- lip-shaped, with few inconspicuous granulations interiorly and distally. Chelal palm ovate (dorsal view), with some interior and exterior granula- tions laterally (Figs. 46, 50). Fixed chelal finger with 66-68 small teeth, and movable chelal fin- ger with 60-62 teeth. Only distal teeth of the latter finger retroconical and pointed, gradually merging into rounded or square-topped teeth which reach the level of b. Sensillum at level of 20th to 26th tooth (at the level of sb or slightly distal to this trichobothrium). A patch of microsetae proximal to eb and esb Table 3. —Linear measurements (in mm) and morphometric ratios in Roncus lubricus tenuis Hadzi, new status, and Roncus dalmatinus Hadzi, new status, from Yugoslavia. R. tenuis R. dalmatinus Character Male Females Males Body Length ( 1 ) 2.19 2.49 2.86-2.91 Cephalothorax Length (2) 0.61 0.67 0.85-0.87 Breadth 0.54 0.63 0.65-0.665 Abdomen Length 1.58 1.82 1.99-2.06 Breadth 0.62 0.75 0.99-1.03 Chelicerae Length (3) 0.37 0.41 0.47-0.48 Breadth (4) 0.195 0.21 0.23-0.24 Length of movable finger (5) 0.25 0.29 0.31-0.32 Length of galea 0.005 0.01 0.01 Pedipalps Length with coxa (6) 3.21 3.28 4.31-4.375 Ratio 6/1 1.465 1.32 1.50-1.51 Length of coxa 0.50 0.51 0.65-0.73 Length of trochanter 0.39 0.39 0.51-0.555 Length of femur (7) 0.63 0.67 0.85-0.88 Breadth of femur (8) 0.195 0.21 0.255-0.26 Ratio 7/8 3.23 3.19 3.27-3.45 Ratio 7/2 1.03 1.00 0.98-1.035 Length of tibia (9) 0.54 0.55 0.74-0.75 Breadth of tibia (10) 0.24 0.25 0.34 Ratio 9/10 2.25 2.20 2.18-2.205 Length of chela (11) 1.15 1.16 1.48-1.54 Breadth of chela ( 1 2) 0.35 0.38 0.47-0.50 Ratio 11/12 3.285 3.05 2.96-3.28 Length of chelal palm (13) 0.57 0.58 0.74-0.78 Ratio 13/12 1.63 1.53 1.48-1.66 Length of chelal finger (14) 0.58 0.58 0.74-0.76 Ratio 14/13 1.02 1.00 0.97-1.00 Leg IV Total length 2.355 2.385 2.67 Length of coxa 0.38 0.39 0.45 Length of trochanter (15) 0.31 0.32 0.34 Breadth of trochanter ( 1 6) 0.15 0.15 0.15 Ratio 15/16 2.07 2.13 2.27 Length of femur (17) 0.59 0.61 0.69 Breadth of femur (18) 0.22 0.22 0.25 Ratio 17/18 2.68 2.77 2.76 Length of tibia ( 1 9) 0.55 0.545 0.63 Breadth of tibia (20) 0.11 0.11 0.14 Ratio 19/20 5.00 4.95 4.50 Length of basitarsus (21) 0.195 0.20 0.23 Breadth of basitarsus (22) 0.10 0.08 0.10 Ratio 21/22 1.95 2.50 2.30 Length of telotarsus (23) 0.33 0.32 0.33 Breadth of telotarsus (24) 0.07 0.08 0.08 Ratio 23/24 4.71 4.00 4.125 TS ratio— tibia IV 0.60 0.58 0.58 TS ratio— basitarsus IV 0.21 0.21 0.19 TS ratio— telotarsus IV 0.33 0.30 0.35 Figures 42-50.— Roncus dalmatinus Hadzi, new status, from Mt. Marjan (Meje), Split, Yugoslavia: 42, car- apace, male; 43, carapace, male; 44, cheliceral fingers, male; 45, pedipalpal chela, male; 46, pedipalpal trochanter, femur and tibia, male; 47, epistome, male; 48, epistome, male; 49, flagellum, male; 50, pedipalp, male. Scales 128 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY absent; a single tubercle on laterodistal side of chelal palm evident. Chelal fingers as long as the chelal palm (Table 3), but shorter than pedipalpal femur. Pedipalpal femur length almost equal to carapacal length (Table 3). Disposition of trichobothria: ist slightly closer to est than to isb; seta sb only slightly closer to b than to st (or equidistant from these) (Fig. 45). Trochanteral foramen pointed and heavily scler- otized. Tibia IV, basitarsus IV, and telotarsus IV each with a single tactile seta; tactile seta ratios as in Table 3. Morphometric ratios and linear measurements are presented in Table 3. Distribution.— According to Hadzi (1933), this species is present on the Island of Krk and at Mt. Marjan, near Split (Dalmatia), Yugoslavia. How- ever, the available type material at our disposal comes from the vicinity of Split only. Therefore, this species is now known from Middle Dalmatia only, although it may be widespread on some Adriatic islands. Interrelationships of R. dalmatinus, R. lubri- cus, and R. tenuis. — From R. lubricus, R. dal- matinus is easily distinguished by the form of the carapace (see also Tables 1 , 3), by the setation of the posterior carapacal margin (6 setae in lu- bricus, 7-8 in dalmatinus), by the form of pe- dipalpal articles (more stout in dalmatinus, more slender in lubricus), by the presence/absence of two sclerotic knobs at the interior and basal re- gion of the pedipalpal femur (present in dal- matinus, absent in lubricus), by the presence/ absence of microsetae proximal to eb and esb (present in lubricus, absent in dalmatinus), as well as by some morphometric ratios and linear measurements (Tables 1, 3). The distinctions between R. dalmatinus and R.tenuis are clearly manifested in the form and size of the epistome (small and tubercular in ten- uis, large and triangular in dalmatinus), in the proportions of the carapace (only slightly longer than wide in tenuis, considerably longer than wide in dalmatinus), in the setation of the posterior carapacal row (6 setae in tenuis, 7-8 in dalma- tinus), in the form of the pedipalpal articles (more stout in tenuis, more slender in dalmatinus), in the number of sclerotic knobs on the interobasal part of the pedipalpal femur (one in tenuis, two in dalmatinus), as well as in some morphometric ratios and linear measurements. According to the absence of microsetae proximal to eb and esb, as well as to the presence of sclerotic knobs on the interior and lateral surface of pedipalpal femora. it can be assumed that both R tenuis and R. dalmatinus pertain to the same species group, which is clearly distinct from R. lubricus and its allies. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Our sincere thanks are due to W. B. Much- more, V. F. Lee, and G. Gardini, who offered many valuable comments and suggestions for the improvement of the text. LITERATURE CITED Beier, M. 1932. Pseudoscorpionidea. 1. Subord. Chthoniinea et Neobisiinea. Tierreich, 57:1-254. Chamberlin, J. C. 1931. The arachnid order Chelo- nethida. Stanford Univ. Publ. (Biol.), 7:1-284. Curcic, B. P. M. 1982. Postembryonic development in the Neobisiidae (Pseudoscorpiones, Arachnida). Serbian Acad. Sci. Arts, Monogr. 545, Dept. Sci., 56:1-90. Curcic, B. P. M. 1988. Cave-dwelling pseudoscor- pions of the Dinaric Karst. Acad. Slov. Sci. Arts, Opera, 26, Inst. Biol., 8:1-191. Curcic, B. P. M. 1991. A new species of the genus Roncus L. Koch, 1873 (Neobisiidae, Pseudoscor- piones) from East Serbia. Mem. BiospeleoL, 18:165- 169. Curcic, B. P. M. in press. Cave pseudoscorpions of East Serbia. Serbian Acad. Sci. Arts, Monogr., Dept. Sci. Divkovic, M. 1987. Latinsko-hrvatski rijecnik za skole. 4th ed. (reprint). Zagreb, Naprijed, 1-1 161. Gabbutt, P. D. & M. Vachon. 1967. The external morphology and life history of the pseudoscorpion Roncus lubricus. J. Zool. London, 153:475-498. Gardini, G. 1981. Roncus caralitanus n. sp. della Sardegna meridionale (Pseudoscorpionida, Neobi- siidae). Boll. Soc. Ent. Italiana, 113:129-135. Gardini, G. 1983. Redescription of /wMcwi L. Koch, 1873, type-species of the genus Roncus L. Koch, 1873 (Pseudoscorpionida, Neobisiidae). Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 6:78-82. Hadzi, J. 1933. Prinos poznavanju pseudoskorpijske faune Primorja. Prirod. Istr. Kralj. Jugoslavije, 18: 125-192. Koch, L. 1873. Uebersichtliche Darstellung der eu- ropaeischen Chemetiden (Pseudoscorpione). Bauer und Raspe, Nuernberg, Pp. 1-68. Muchmore, W. B. 1969. A population of a European pseudoscorpion established in New York. Ent. News, 80:66. Poinar, Jr., G. O. & B. P. M. Curcic. 1992. Parasitism of Pseudoscorpiones (Arachnida) by Mermithidae (Nematoda). J. Arachnol., 20:64-66. Manuscript received July 1991; revised September 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:129-133 NOTES ON MATING AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF CEROPELMA LONGISTERNALIS (ARANEAE, THERAPHOSIDAE) IN CAPTIVITY Fernando G. Costa and Fernando Perez-Miles: Division Zoologia Experimental, Insti- tute de Investigaciones Biologicas Clemente Estable; Av. Italia 3318, Montevideo, Uruguay ABSTRACT. The reproductive success of a mating pair of Cewpelma longisternalis is reported. Courtship and mating behaviour are described. The female molted, mated, built a retreat, and made a free egg sac under laboratory conditions. For 49 days she remained in the retreat, until the juveniles emerged. Courtship, mating and egg production are discussed and compared with data from other Mygalomorphae. The biology of Theraphosidae in particular, and Mygalomorphae in general, has not been studied as thoroughly as that of the Araneomor- phae. The state of Mygalomorphae systematics is confusing and has only recently been globaly focused (Raven 1985). Baerg (1928, 1958) car- ried out the first biological studies on thera- phosid natural history; and more recently Minch (1978a, b, c; 1979a, b) studied Aphonopelma chaicodes Chamberlin intensively. The Thera- phosidae is a predominantly South American family, yet the biology of most South American species is unknown. Brazil & Vellard (1926) and Biicherl (1951; 1952) described the reproductive biology of several species, but only as addenda to medical or systematic objectives. Galiano (1969; 1973a, b; 1984) and Celerier (1986a) de- scribed the postembryonic development and the life cycles of several species, including Ceropel- ma longisternalis Schiapelli & Gerschman (Ga- liano 1973a). In spite of the frequent breeding and commercialization of “tarantulas” in many parts of the world, information on reproduction obtained through mating in the laboratory is only know from a brief note of Celerier (1986b). The present paper initiates a series of studies on the biology of some Uruguayan Mygalomor- phae, contributing information regarding the re- productive biology of C. longisternalis, a rela- tively small-sized theraphosid spider (9.7 mm carapace length). We describe the reproductive success of a female that molted and mated in the laboratory. METHODS An adult female and an adult male C. longis- ternalis were captured in the Sierra de las Ani- mas, Maldonado, Uruguay, on 1 7 March and 1 8 April 1989, respectively. They were maintained separately in the laboratory in plastic petri dishes (14.0 cm in diameter and 1.5 cm high) with wet cotton wool. Tenebrio sp. larvae (Coleoptera) and cockroach Blaptica dubia juveniles were provid- ed weekly for food. The female molted on 23 March 1989, reverting to a virgin. Maximum and minimum room temperatures were recorded dai- ly. Room temperature, during captivity until mating, was maintained close to 25 °C; thereafter it was more variable (Fig. 1). After copulating the female was placed in a cylindrical glass jar measuring 17.0 cm in diameter and 6.0 cm high, with a lid, and containing a 3 cm deep layer of soil. She was fed mealworms and cockroaches ad libitum, and provided with a small container with water. OBSERVATIONS On 20 April 1989 the male and female were placed together: the plastic petri dish with the female was placed inside a larger cylindrical con- tainer (17.0 cm diameter and 6.0 cm high) and the lid was removed. Ten minutes later the male was gently placed in the container. He advanced slowly and soon made contact with the female. The male’s courting behavior was characterized by palpal drumming (up and down alternating movements of the palpi touching the substra- tum) and body vibrations (probably caused by inward contractions of the third legs). The female raised her body threateningly, extended the palpi and forelegs upwards and opened her chelicerae. The male tapped the female with his forelegs and, pushing, clasped with his tibial spurs the female’s open fangs. The female’s fangs penetrated be- 129 130 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY time (months) Figure 1 . — Room temperature variations during maintainance of copulated female Ceropelma longisternalis\ the superior line represents maximum daily temperatures and the inferior line minimum daily temperatures. tween the external and the internal spurs, by the retrolateral side of male forelegs, and closed around the external apophysis (Figs. 2-5). The basal tubercle of each foreleg metatarsus appar- ently helped hold the female’s fang while the metatarsus and tarsus remained against the basal joint of her chelicera. The male’s second legs surrounded the female cephalothorax and pulled Figures 2-5. — Copulation in C. longisternalis: 2, Initial copulation position (drawing obtained from a pho- tograph). The male (at left) grasps the female cheliceral fangs with the foreleg tibial spurs while surrounding and attracting her with second legs; 3, The male attempts to insert the left palpus while the female (at right) rises over the male (drawing obtained from another photograph); 4, Ventral view (slightly prolateral) of tibial meta- tarsus joint of male right foreleg showing external (es) and internal (is) tibial spurs, and metatarsal basal tubercle (bt); 5, Male right foreleg (at left) clasping female left cheliceae (at right), lateral view. Drawn from photographs, notes and a reconstruction using preserved specimens. COSTA & PEREZ-MILES- REPRODUCTION IN CEROPELMA 131 it towards him to raise the female, so that the male palpi could approach the female genital zone (Fig. 2). Legs III and IV of both spiders were responsible for equilibrium. The male palpi os- cillated in alternate fashion barely touching the female’s abdomen while the male placed himself underneath; initially the female lifted the ab- domen a little avoiding contact with the extended male palpi (Fig. 3). Palpal insertions alternated regularly begin- ning with the left palpus. There were five inser- tions and the average duration of each was 50 s. The female initiated weak leg movements 105 s after commencement of copulation. Male body vibrations were also recorded after three min (during the fourth palpal insertion). The mating pair partially lost its balance twice, 20 s and 306 s after commencing copulation; following the lat- ter the female increased leg movements and the male moved backwards freeing the female from his grasp. An immediate new encounter showed an active but non-aggressive female but did not involve any clasping attempts by the male. Cop- ulation measured from the first insertion lasted 5.3 min. Room temperature during copulation was 23 °C. The male copulated one and four days later with two other females. The mated female mounded soil against one side of the container and built a retreat there against the glass so that we could partially ob- serve her activity. The retreat was lined with silk and its ceiling was against the lid. The female reconstructed this silk ceiling each time it was destroyed when we opened the jar to provide food. Towards the beginning of spring (27 Sep- tember, 160 days after copulation), the female built a white oval egg sac with a 2.0 cm maxi- mum diameter. The egg sac was not attached to the retreat and the female kept her palpi and legs in contact with it. Juveniles emerged 49 days following oviposition. We then opened the re- treat, counted the juveniles, measured the re- treat, returned the juveniles to the female, and closed the container (duration of manipulation: 40 min). Only 16 juveniles were found (three of them with exuviae remains still attached) and 1 0 exuviae adhered to the retreat’s silk. The egg sac silk capsule was not analysed and remained pressed against the end of the retreat. The re- treat’s characteristics were as follows: large silk capsule over ground surface measuring 15.0 cm long, 3.5 cm wide and 2.0 cm high, limited on top by the lid, on the sides by the glass wall and towards the center of the container by the soil accumulated with silk. This capsule connected with the underground portion through a hole of approximately 2.5 cm diameter. The under- ground portion, extended horizontally along the bottom of the container and measured 7.0 cm long, 2. 3-3. 2 cm wide and 2. 3-4.0 cm high. The female did not rebuild the silk capsule following manipulation or expel the egg sac’s covering. Juveniles were frequently seen out of the retreat 22 days after emergence. The female molted 85 days after emergence of juveniles (8 February 1990, summer). Two juveniles still re- mained in the retreat. The observations ended four days later. DISCUSSION Immediate contact between male and female prevented us from noticing whether the male can detect the presence of a female by contact with her silk. Nevertheless, one of us (Costa) observed a sexual response in this and other male C. lon- gisternalis when placed on female silk. Male be- havior was: brusque frontward and downward pushing movements of his body, which quickly drew back keeping the tarsi fixed on the ground. Platnick (1971) considered male Theraphosidae capable of sexual recognition only by direct con- tact with females (level I). But other authors have observed courting responses in males in the pres- ence of conspecific female silk: Baerg (1958) in Dugesiella hentzi (Girard) and Minch (1979b) in Aphonopelma chalcodes Chamberlin, and also one of us (Costa) in species of Grammostola Simon, Eupalaestrus Pocock, Oligoxystre Vel- lard, Acanthoscurria Ausserer and Homeomma Ausserer. These observations suggest that tacto- chemical recognition is widespread in the family. Male C. iongisternalis movements (palpal drumming, body vibrations and advancing with forelegs raised) when placed before the female, female movements (threatening with palpi and forelegs, raised body, half-open chelicerae) and combined movements (tapping and entwining forelegs) are similar to the courtship movements observed in other Theraphosidae and other My- galomorphae. Probably these movements con- stitute species-specific stimuli transmitted via acoustic and/or vibratory channels (through the substratum) and the tacto-chemical channel dur- ing physical contact. The apparently threatening female response is a necessary condition for cop- ulation enabling the male to grasp the female’s fangs with his foreleg tibial spurs. This peculiar grasp is the rule in Theraphosidae (Baerg 1928, 132 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 1958; Minch 1979b; Bergo & Abe 1985; Costa [pers. obs. in several Uruguayan species]), and was also reported for Nemesia caementaria (La- treille), Nemesiidae, by Buchli (1962), and for Australothele jamiesoni Raven, Dipluridae, by Raven (1988). It is surprising that Brazil & Vel- lard (1926) and Biicherl (1951) did not describe this conspicuous cheliceral clasping in Gram- mostola spp. The simultaneous attraction of legs II and the fastening of forelegs onto the female chelicerae neutralizes these dangerous instruments and po- sitions the genital zone within reach of the male palpi. A similar male attraction, either of the body or of the basal part of the female’s legs, has not been indicated in Theraphosidae, although already reported in Dipluridae: Euagrus sp., Coyle ( 1986) and Australothele jamiesoni. Raven (1988); in Hexathelidae: Macrothele calpeiana (Walckenaer), Snazell & Allison (1989); in Ne- mesiidae: Nemesia caementaria, Buchli (1962) and Acanthogonatus tacuariensis (Perez-Miles & Capocasale), Costa, pers. comm, in Perez-Miles & Capocasale (1982). Coyle (1985) briefly reviewed the different types of sexual embrace in Mygalomorphae. Grasping with legs II in C. longisternalis seems to disturb the couple’s equilibrium. Clasping of chelicerae forces this species to assume a raised position, incompatible with copulation in the safety of the usual narrow burrows of the females. Conse- quently we would expect copulation to occur at the burrow entrance, as Minch ( 1 979b) observed for Aphonopelma chalcodes. The increased risk of mating in an exposed situation would be com- pensated for by the brief duration of copulation. Baerg (1928, 1958) observed in Eurypelma californica Ausserer and Dugesiella hentzi be- tween 1-4 alternating palpal insertions in one minute. Minch (1979b) reported an average of seven alternating insertions during 2.3 min in chalcodes. The C. longisternalis copulation was longer than in these spiders, but the number of insertions was intermediate between them. Postcopulatory attack, and subsequent can- nibalism, by the female was reported by Brazil & Vellard (1926) and Biicherl (1951, 1952) in several South American Theraphosidae. Our ob- servations on C. longisternalis and other Uru- guayan Theraphosidae show that males escape undamaged after copulation. Biicherl (1951, 1952) stressed as exceptional the absence of fe- male cannibalism in Grammostola mollicoma (Ausserer) and G. longimana Mello-Leitao. Ber- go & Abe (1985) reported a similar fact in Pam- phobeteus sorocabae Mello-Leitao, a species cit- ed by Biicherl (1952), however, as a postnuptial devourer. Multiple copulation by males, a phe- nomenon observed in this study and common in Uruguayan theraphosids and other mygalo- morphs (Baerg 1928, 1958; Minch 1979b; Coyle 1986; Coyle & O’Shields 1990) may be in part the result of pronounced female longevity and a resultant high ratio of adult females to adult males (Coyle 1986). The closed retreat built by C. longisternalis when overwintering and laying eggs is similar to the closed burrows observed by others: Baerg (1958) in D. hentzi. Gabel (1972) in a non-de- termined “tarantula”, and Minch (1979a) in A. chalcodes. In the field juveniles and non-repro- ductive females C. longisternalis build simple silk tubes under stones, with little or no under- ground component. The construction reported here probably improves clutch viability by damping external thermal and humidity varia- tions. Its reconstruction ceased with the emer- gence of juveniles. Duration of egg sac incubation is comparable with that indicated by Biicherl (1951) in Grammostola spp., Ibarra-Grasso (1961) in G. burzaquensis Ibarra-Grasso, Baerg (1958) and Whitcomb & Weems (1976) in Du- gesiella hentzi, but shorter than that indicated by Brazil & Vellard (1926) in Grammostola spp. The very low number of juveniles emerging from the egg sac may be due to laboratory con- ditions. Two C. longisternalis egg sacs of similar size obtained in the field contained 103 and 1 1 1 eggs, with an average diameter of 1 .7 mm. Larger species of Theraphosidae lay more eggs: the small Grammostola burzaquensis lays 100-200 eggs (Ibarra-Grasso 1961), the large Acanthoscurria atrox Vellard up to 2000 eggs (Lourengo 1978) and the large Pamphobeteus spp. between 1 200- 2000 eggs (Bucherl 1951; Valente et al. 1985). The postreproductive molt seems to occur later in C. longisternalis than in other species (Brazil & Vellard 1926; Bucherl 1951). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are indebted to Liliana Prandi for the maintainance of spiders, to Roberto Capocasale, Gabriel Francescoli, Barbara Y. Main and Fred- erick A. Coyle for the critical reading of the manuscript, to Eduardo Gudynas for his help with drawings and to Ines Trabal for the trans- lation into English. COSTA & PEREZ-MILES-REPRODUCTION IN CEROPELMA 133 LITERATURE CITED Baerg, W. J. 1928. The life cycle and mating habits of the male tarantula. Quart. Rev. Biol., 3:109-1 16. Baerg, W.J. 1958. The Tarantula. Univ. Kansas Press; Lawrence, Kansas. 88 pp. Bergo, E. S. & A. S. Abe. 1985. Observagoes sobre o comportamento de corte e copula em Pamphob- eteus sorocabae Mello-Leitao, 1923 Araneae - Ther- aphosidae. Res. XII Congr. Brasil. Zool. Pp.46-47. Brazil, V. & J. Vellard. 1926. Contribugao ao estudo do veneno das aranhas (continuagao) (Segunda me- moria). Mem. Inst. Butantan (Brasil), 3:243-299. Biicherl, W. 1951. Estudos sobre a biologia e a sis- tematica do genero Grammostola Simon, 1892. Monogr. Inst. Butantan, 1:1-126. Biicherl, W. 1952. Instintos matemais nas aranhas brasileiras. Dusenia, 3:57-74. Buchli, H. 1962. Note preliminaire sur Faccouple- ment des araignees mygalomorphes Nemesia cae- mentaria, Nemesia dubia et Pachylomerus piceus (Ctenizidae). Vie et Milieu, 13:167-178. Celerier, M.-L. 1986a. Energy cost of exuviae pro- duction of spiders. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 7: 77-82. Celerier, M.-L. 1986b. Elevage d’un mygale: ^co^/ra griseipes, Pocock 1897 (Araneae, Theraphosidae). Actas X Congr. Int. Aracnol. Jaca/Espaha, 1:56. Coyle, F. A. 1985. Observations on the mating be- haviour of the tiny mygalomorph spider, Microh- exura montivaga Crosby & Bishop (Araneae, Di- pluridae). Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 6:328-330. Coyle, F. A. 1986. Courtship, mating, and the func- tion of male-specific leg structures in the mygalo- morph spider genus Euagrus (Araneae, Dipluridae). Proc. IX Int. Congr. Arachnol., Panama. Pp. 33- 38. Coyle, F. A. & T. C. O’Shields. 1990. Courtship and mating behavior of Thelochoris karschi (Araneae, Dipluridae), an African funnel web spider. J. Ar- achnoL, 18:281-296. Gabel, J. R. 1972. Further observations of the ther- aphosid tarantula burrows. Pan-Pacific EntomoL, 48:72-73. Galiano, M. E. 1969. El desarrollo postembrionario larval en Grammostola pulchripes (Simon, 1891) (Araneae, Theraphosidae). Physis (Buenos Aires), C. 29:73-90. Galiano, M. E. 1973a. El desarrollo postembrionario larval en Theraphosidae (Araneae). Physis (Buenos Aires), C. 32:37-A6. Galiano, M. E. 1973b. El desarrollo postembrionario larval de Avicularia avicularia (Linnaeus, 1758) (Araneae, Theraphosidae). Physis (Buenos Aires), C. 32:315-327. Galiano, M. E. 1984. Datos adicionales sobre el ciclo vital de Acanthoscurria sternalis Pocock, 1 903 (Ara- neae, Theraphosidae). Rev. Soc. Ent. Argentina, 43: 45-55. Ibarra-Grasso, A. 1961. Datos biologicos sobre Grammostola burzaquensis Ibarra Grasso 1 946 y su distribucion geografica (Araneae, Theraphosidae). Neotropica, 7:7-12. Lourengo, W. R. 1978. Notas sobre a biologia de Acanthoscurria atrox Vellard, 1 924 (Araneae, Ther- aphosidae). Rev. Brasileira Biol., 38:161-164. Minch, E. W. 1978a. Daily activity patterns in the \3.Tanln\dLAphonopelmachalcodesC\ia.mher\m. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 4:231-237. Minch, E. W. 1978b. The effectiveness of chemical defenses against predation by the tarantula Aphon- opelma chalcodes Chamberlin. Bull. British Arach- nol. Soc., 4:275-278. Minch, E. W. 1978c. Some notes on the egg sacs of Aphonopelma chalcodes (Araneae: Theraphosidae). Pan-Pacific Entomol., 54:153. Minch, E. W. 1979a. Burrow entrance plugging be- haviour in the tarantula Aphonopelma chalcodes Chamberlin (Araneae: Theraphosidae). Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 4:414-415. Minch, E. W. 1979b. Reproductive behaviour of the X&ran\n\2i Aphonopelma chalcodes Chamberlin (Ara- neae: Theraphosidae). Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 4:416-420. Perez-Miles, F. & R. M. Capocasale. 1982. Aranas del Uruguay, IV. Hallazgo de una tercera especie del genero Pycnothelopsis: Pycnothelopsis tacuarien- sis sp. nov. (Araneae, Pycnothelidae). Com. Zool. Mus. Hist. Nat. Montevideo, 11:1-7. Platnick, N. 1971. The evolution of courtship be- haviour in spiders. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 2: 40-47. Raven, R. J. 1985. The spider infraorder Mygalo- morphae (Araneae): Cladistics and systematics. Bull. American Mus. Nat. Hist., 182:1-180. Raven, R. J. 1988. Preliminary observations on the mating behaviour of the Australian mygalomorph spider Australothele jamiesoni (Dipluridae, Arane- ae, Arachnida). Mem. Queensland Mus., 25:471- 474. Snazell, R. & R. Allison. 1 989. The genus Macrothele Ausserer (Araneae, Hexathelidae) in Europe. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 8:65-72. Valente, M. M., I. Mombrum de Carvalho & M. J. Bauab-Vianna, 1985. Microanatomia do aparelho genital femenino de Pamphobeteus sorocabae (Po- cock, 1901) (Aviculariidae - Araneae). Res. XII Congr. Brasileiro Zool. Pp. 46. Whitcomb, W. H. & H. V. Weems, Jr. 1976. The tarantula (family Theraphosidae). Florida Dept. Agr. 7 Consumer. Serv., Division Plant Industry, Ento- mol. Circular, 169:1-2. Manuscript received April 1991, revised August 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:134-136 DESCRIPCION DEL MACHO DE ACHAEARANEA JEQUIRITUBA (ARANEAE, THERIDIIDAE)’ Alda Gonzalez^: Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Paseo del Bosque s/n, 1900 La Plata, Argentina ABSTRACT. Description of the male of Achaeranea jequirituba (Araneae, Theridiidae). The male oiAchaear- anea jequirituba from Misiones province (Argentina) is described and new distributional records and biological considerations are given. RESUMEN. Se describe el macho de Achaearanea jequirituba de la provincia de Misiones, se amplia su distribucion geografica y se aportan consideraciones biologicas. El genero Achaearanea Strand, esta amplia- mente distribuido por todo el mundo y escasa- mente representado en nuestro pais. Revisiones de las especies americanas fueron publicadas por Levi (1955, 1959, 1963, 1967). Levi (1963) sos- tiene que pocas especies son citadas para Argen- tina debido a la falta de especimenes en las co- lecciones. Algunas especies de Achaearanea son dificiles de separar de las de Theridion, parti- cularmente cuando solo la hembra es conocida. Muchas de las nuevas especies descriptas por Levi para America del Norte, Central y del Sur comprenden solamente la descripcion de los ejemplares hembras. Achaearanea jequirituba fue descripta por Levi en 1 963. En el presente trabajo se describe el macho dt Achaearanea jequirituba, hasta ahora desconocido para la ciencia, se am- plia su distribucion geografica a la Argentina y se aportan datos sobre la biologia. METODOS Los estudios efectuados se realizaron sobre material colectado en el campo. En viajes real- izados a la provincia de Misiones en el ano 1 989, se hallaron en las barandas de las pasarelas de los saltos de las Cataratas del Iguazu, ejemplares hembras que fueron identificados como Achaearanea jequirituba y ejemplares machos no descriptos hasta ese momento. Del material co- lectado se seleccionaron cinco parejas de machos ' Contribucidn N° 195 del Centro de Estudios Paras- itologicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE). ^ Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. 1 900 La Plata, Argentina. (Investigadora, CONICET). y hembras que copularon en el laboratorio. Cua- tro de las hembras que se colectaron estaban gravidas y desovaron en el laboratorio produ- ciendo diez ootecas. Se criaron los juveniles provenientes de esos desoves y los machos ob- tenidos resultaron Achaearanea jequirituba, identificandose asi al macho de la especie que se describe por primera vez. Los dibujos se llevaron a cabo con camara Clara bajo microscopio binocular estereoscopico. Las medidas se expresan en milimetros. Abreviaturas utilizadas: MLP, Museo de Cien- cias Naturales de La Plata; MACN, Museo Ar- gentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Ri- vadavia”. Achaearanea jequirituba Levi Figs. 1-2 Achaearanea jequirituba Levi, 1963, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 129:226, figs. 98-99. (Hembra holotipo de Je- quirituba, Sao Paulo, Brasil, en el American Muse- um of Natural History). Descripcion. Macho. Cefalotorax ancho en su parte media-posterior. Con surco toracico tri- angular. Ojos medianos anteriores mayores que el resto, 0.09 mm de diametro, separados entre si por 0.06 mm, subcontiguos a los laterales. Ojos posteriores casi en linea recta. Diametro de los medianos posteriores 0.064 mm, separados entre si por mas de su diametro (0.07 mm). Ojos la- terales contiguos. Ojos laterales posteriores se- parados de los medianos posteriores por 0.046 mm. Cefalotorax, dorsalmente pardo claro. Ven- tralmente pardo oscuro con hordes negros. Patas pardo claro con los extremos distales de patela, tibia y metatarso negros. Palpos pardo claro. Ab- 134 GONZALEZ- DESCRIPCION DEL MACHO DE ACHAEARANEA JEQUIRITUBA 135 domen alargado. Dorsalmente predomina el col- or negro, con lineas grises blanquecinas distri- buidas irregularmente, sin manchas definidas. Ventralmente negro con pequenas manchas blancas alrededor de la zona anal. Medidas: Lar- go total 1.90 mm. Cefalotorax: largo 0.96 mm, ancho 0.70 mm. Pata I: femur 1.54 mm, patela + tibia 1.38 mm, metatarso 1.22 mm, tarso 0.50 mm. Pata II: femur 1.04 mm, patela + tibia 0.94 mm. Pata III: femur 0.70 mm, patela + tibia 0.64 mm. Pata IV: femur 1.07 mm, patela + tibia 0.96 mm, metatarso 0.56 mm, tarso 0.42 mm. Longitud relativa de las patas 1-4-2-3. El palpo con un embolo corto. El epigino fue descripto por Levi, 1963, figs. 98-99. Distribucion: BRASIL. Guanabara, Rio de Ja- neiro. PARAGUAY. ARGENTINA. Misiones, Parque Nacional Iguazu. Material examinado: R. ARGENTINA, Misiones, Parque Nacional Iguazu, 1 2 N° 17.154 MLP, 1 S N° 17.159MLP, noviembre 1988 (Gonzalez); 2 2 N“ 17.155 MLP, 27 2 N° 17.157 MLP, 6 3 N° 17.160 MLP, se- tiembre 1989 (Gonzalez); 1 2 N° 8.882. 1980 MACN (Galiano). Biologia; Las hembras fueron encontradas dentro de sus nidos. Estos consisten en una hoja arrollada, suspendida de sus extremes por hilos de tela en el angulo formado por dos parantes de la baranda de las pasarelas. La hoja presen ta un extreme totalmente cerrado y el otro con una pequena abertura por donde entra y sale la arana. Los individuos se alojan en su interior, cercanos al extreme cerrado. Generalmente las hembras permanecen en el nido junto al desove. Los ma- chos fueron hallados compartiendo el nido con las hembras o suspendidos de los hilos de la tela que sostienen al nido. Las ootecas son de color bianco, de aspecto algodonoso y de forma piriforme. Son de pe- queno tamano, miden promedio 2.9 mm de largo (maximo 3.32 mm, minimo 2.64 mm) y pro- medio 2.6 mm de ancho (maximo 2.75 mm, minimo 2.48 mm). Los huevos son esfericos, blancos y miden entre 0.58 mm y 0.62 mm de diametro. El total de huevos de las diez ootecas examinadas fue de 298. El promedio resultante fue de 18 huevos por ooteca, con un maximo de 32 y un minimo de 15. El desarrollo postembrionario es similar en el tipo de eclosion y numero de estadios (desde la eclosion hasta la dispersion) al de otras especies de la familia Theridiidae, descriptos en trabajos Figuras 1, 2.— Palpo izquierdo. 1) ventral; 2) lateral. 136 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY anteriores (Gonzalez 1979, 1981, 1984, 1986, 1988). El lapse entre el desove y la dispersion de los juveniles es de promedio 22.5 dias (maximo 25, minimo 17) considerando los individuos de 1 0 ootecas estudiadas. LITERATURA CITADA Gonzalez, A. 1979. Observaciones bioecologicas sobre una especie del genero LatrodectusWalckm'a.ei, 1805, del grapo mactans, de Sierra de la Ventana (Prov- incia de Buenos Aires, Argentina) (Araneae, Ther- idiidae). Ill ~ Desarrollo postembrionario. Acta Zool. Lilloana, 35:95-110. Gonzalez, A. 1981. Desarrollo postembrioario de La- trodectus mirabilis, Latrodectus corallinus y Latro- dectus antheratus (Araneae, Theridiidae). Physis (Bs. As.), Secc. C, 39:83-91. Gonzalez, A. 1982. E! desarrollo postembrionario de Tidarren sisyphoides (Walckenaer) (Araneae, Ther- idiidae). Physis (Bs. As.), Secc. C, 41:87-91. Gonzalez, A. 1 984. Desarrollo postembrionario y ev- olucion de los organos mecanoreceptores de Latro- dectus diaquita Carcavallo y estudio de la tricobo- triotaxia de Lactrodectus quartus Abalos (Araneae, Theridiidae). Physis (Bs. As.) Secc. C, 42:1-5. Gonzalez, A. 1987. Ciclo biologico y desarrollo de Steatoda retorta Gonzalez (Araneae, Theridiidae). Revta. Soc. Ent. Argentina, 44:185-197. Gonzalez, A. y A. L. Estevez. 1988. Estudio del de- sarroilo postembrionario y estadisticos vitales de Theridion rufipes Lucas, 1846 (Araneae, Theridi- idae). Revta. Bras. Ent., 32:499-506. Levi, H. 1955. The spider genera Coressa and Achaearanea in America North of Mexico (Araneae, Theridiidae) American Mus. Novitates, 1718:1-33. Levi.H. 1959. The spider genera Achaearanea, Ther- idion and Sphyrotinus from Mexico, Central Amer- ica and West Indies. (Araneae, Theridiidae). Bull. Mus. Comp. ZooL, 121:57-163. Levi, H. 1963. American spiders of the genus Achaearanea and the new genus Echinotheridion (Araneae, Theridiidae). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 129: 189-240. Levi, H. 1967. The theridiid spider fauna of Chile. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zooi., 136:1-20. Manuscript received November 1990, revised December 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:137-143 A REVIEW OF META (ARANEAE, TETRAGNATHIDAE), WITH DESCRIPTION OF TWO NEW SPECIES Yuri M. Marusik: Institute of Biological Problems of the North, Russian Academy of Sciences, Magadan 685010, Russia Seppo Koponen’: Centre d’etudes nordiques, Universite Laval, Ste-Foy, Quebec GIK 7P4, Canada ABSTRACT. The validity of the genera Meta C. L. Koch and Metellina Chamberlin & Ivie is supported, mainly based on genital structure and living habitats. Two new species, closely related to and earlier partly included in Meta menardi (Latreille) (limited to Europe), are described: M. americana n. sp. (eastern North America) and M. manchurica n. sp. (Russian Far East). The additional species of Meta are M. bourneti Simon (southern Europe, Caucasus and Canary Islands) and M. dolloff\x.Vi (California). The status of the genera Meta C. L. Koch, 1836 and Metellina Chamberlin & Ivie, 1 94 1 has been unstable. Levi (1980) treated them as valid gen- era in his North American revision. Although this concept has been followed by some recent authors (Levy 1985; Marusik 1985, 1986; Ya- ginuma 1986; Coddington 1990), some others have considered Meta a senior synonym of Me- tellina (Wunderlich 1987). The genus Meta sensu stricto includes three known species, Meta menardi (Latreille), M. bourneti Simon and M. dollojfl^Yi. The first mentioned has been regarded as a Holarctic spe- cies. The material previously treated as M. men- ardi appears to include three very closely related species, with allopatric distributions. The two new species will be described here. THE GENERA META AND METELLINA We cannot agree with the synonymization of Meta and Metellina made by Wunderlich ( 1 987). As Levi (1980) clearly pointed out there are marked differences in body shape and in genitalia of both sexes; see figs. 95-135 in Levi (1980) and figs. 49, 54 in Coddington (1990). The main dif- ferences in genitalia between genera Meta and Metellina are: epigynum, embolus, conductor and paracymbium sclerotized in Meta and not in Me- tellina, embolus free in Meta and covered by conductor in Metellina, base of embolus com- plex (apophyses) in Meta compared to the simple ' Current address: Zoological Museum, Univer- sity of Turku, SF-20500 Turku, Finland base in Metellina, conductor directed prolater- ally in Meta and more horizontally in Metellina, and epigynal openings posterior in Meta and ventral in Metellina. Coddington (1990) pointed out the difference in the sperm duct routing through tegulum in Meta (complex) and Metel- lina (simple). The size ol Meta varies from 8-17 mm and that of Metellina from 4-8 mm, and the abdomen of Meta is almost as high as long. The species of Meta live in caves (however, see Pen- nington 1979) and only a few species of Metellina occur in cave entrances, the rest living outside of caves. The placement of Meta at the family level is also open to discussion. Traditionally it has been included in Araneidae (e.g.. Locket & Millidge 1953), and Simon (1929) placedM^ta in the sub- family Tetragnathinae. Locket et al. (1974) trans- ferred Meta into Tetragnathidae, and recently it has been considered either in the family Metidae, or in the subfamily Metinae vffthin Tetragnath- idae or within Araneidae (see e.g., Heimer & Nentwig 1982; Roberts 1985; Levi 1986; Wun- derlich 1986). Differences in anatomy and gen- italia between metids and tetragnathids have been pointed out, e.g., by Palmgren (1978) and Cod- dington ( 1 990). We prefer to include Meta in the subfamily Metinae within the family Tetrag- nathidae until new data is available. THE GENUS META C. L. KOCH For description and figures of Meta bourneti, known from southern Europe, Caucasus and Ca- 137 138 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY nary Islands, and of M. dolloff, from California, see Locket & Millidge (1953), Levi (1980) and Roberts (1985). Meta americana, new species Figures 1-4, 14 Types. — Male holotype, male paratype and fe- male paratype from USA, Pennsylvania, NE of Jamison, Horseshoe Bend, Neshaminy Cr. (40U6'N, 75°03'W); June 1954, leg. W. Ivie; de- posited in the American Museum of Natural His- tory, New York. One male and one female para- type from the same locality and date; deposited in the Zoological Museum, Moscow State Uni- versity, Russia. Three male paratypes and one female paratype from Canada, Ontario, Egan- ville, Bonneshere Caves (45°30'N, 77°00'W); 12 June 1972, leg. S. Peck; deposited in the Cana- dian National Collections, Ottawa. Etymology.— The specific name refers to the distribution area. Diagnosis.— Af. americana differs from close- ly related M. manchurica and M. menardi in the shape of copulatory organs. M. americana has the widest tegulum and numerous small denticles on conductor (Figs. 1, 14). Unlike M. menardi, M. americana has clearly divided apophysis on the embolus base (Fig. 2) as does M. manchurica. The ridge on the embolus base of M. americana is higher and wider than that of M. manchurica (Figs. 1, 2 and 5, 6). The paracymbium is distally not so rounded as that of M. manchurica and M. menardi (Figs. 3, 7, 12). Females of M. amer- icana can be recognized by the shape and col- oration of the epigynal bulge which is wide and darker than the basal part of the epigynum (Fig. 4). Description.— 5/ze.‘ total length of males 7.0- 10.1 mm, of females 7.8-13.7 mm; carapace length of males 3. 7-5.0 mm, of females 4. 0-5. 9 mm; carapace width of males 3. 0-4.0 mm, of females 3. 3-4. 5 mm; leg I (femur- patella -I- tibia- metatarsus + tarsus) of males 9.5-8.0-10.5 mm, 7.2-10.2-11.1 mm and 7.5-10.4-11.2 mm, of females 6. 5-8. 2-8. 5 mm and 7. 5-9. 5-9. 8 mm. Coloration, see Levi’s (1980) description and figs. 113-115. Male palp: see Figs. 1-3, 14, and figs. 124-127 in Levi (1980). Conductor with numerous small, thin denticles, tegulum wide. Epigynum: see Fig. 4 and figs. 1 1 6-1 20 in Levi (1980). Bulge darker than basal part of epigyn- um. Distribution.— Eastern North America (main- ly east of the Mississippi River); the northern- most records are from Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, southern Quebec and northern shore of Lake Superior; in the south it reaches the north- ern parts of Georgia, Alabama, Arkansas and Oklahoma, the southernmost record being from Louisiana, Baton Rouge (Levi 1980: map 5). Material examined.— Type material, and 13 males and 1 7 females from Canada (Nova Scotia, New Bruns- wick, Quebec and Ontario; in the Canadian National Collections and in the Zoological Museum, University of Turku). In addition, Prof. H. W. Levi kindly com- pared present figures with a number of specimens from the USA (in the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University). Meta manchurica, new species Figures 5-9, 15 Types. — Holotype male from Russia, Primor- ski (Maritime) Province, 20 km SW from Par- tizansk, entrance of a cave; 2 May 1978, leg. A. Lelei. Two female paratypes Primorski Prov., Khasan District, Nerpichya Bay, cave; 3 Septem- ber 1978, leg. B.P. Zakharov. Types are depos- ited in the Zoological Museum, Moscow State University, Russia. Etymology.— The specific name refers to the distribution area. Diagnosis.— Af. manchurica can be distin- guished from closely related Af. americana and Af. menardi by copulatory organs. Tegulum of Af. manchurica is somewhat thicker than that of Af. menardi but thinner than of M. americana (Figs. 1, 5, 10). Denticles of conductor thick as in Af. menardi but shorter and more numerous (Figs. 15-16). Unlike in Af. menardi and Af. americana, apophyses of the embolus base are pointed in M. manchurica, and ridge at the em- bolus base is low and short (Fig. 6). Females of Af. manchurica can be recognized by the wide epigynal bulge (Figs. 8, 9). Description.— 5/zd; male 10.2 mm, females 1 1.6-12.2 mm; carapace length of male 4.8 mm, of females 5.2 mm; carapace width of male 4.0 mm, of females 4. 0-4. 4 mm. Leg I (femur-patella + tibia-metatarsus + tarsus) of male 7.5-10.1- 1 1.4 mm, offemales 7.8-10.0-1 1.0 mm and 8.0- 10.5-10.6 mm. Coloration as in Af. menardi but darker. Male palp: see Figs. 5-7 and 15. Conductor with numerous thick denticles, base of embolus with pointed apical and dorsal apophyses, ridge on base of embolus low and short. Epigynum: see Figs. 8-9. Wide pale bulge, bas- MARUSIK & KOPONEN-REVIEW OF META, WITH TWO NEW SPECIES 139 Figures l-A.~Meta americana n. sp., types from Pennsylvania; I, left male palp; 2, embolic apophysis; 3, paracymbium; 4, epigynum (posterior view). Scale bars: 0. 1 mm. 140 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 9 Figures 5-9.— Meta manchurica n. sp., types from Primorski Province, Russia: 5, left male palp; 6, embolic apophysis; 7, paracymbium; 8, epigynum (ventral view); 9, epigynum (posterior view). Scale bars: 0.1 mm for Figs. 5-7 & 9; 0.25 mm for Fig. 8. al part of epigynum is darker than the apical one Meta menardi (Latreille, 1 804) (bulge). Figures 10-13, 16 Distribution. - Maritime Province of Russia, Diagnosis. -See that of M. americana and M. possibly also Japan and Korea. manchurica Material examined. - Only types. Description. — See Wiehle (1931), Locket & MARUSIK & KOPONEN- REVIEW OF META, WITH TWO NEW SPECIES 141 Figures 10-13.— Meta menardi (Latreille) from Germany: 10, left male palp; 1 1, embolic apophysis; 12, para- cymbium; 13, epigynum (posterior view). Scale bars: 0.1 mm. Millidge (1953) and Roberts (1985) and Figs. 1 0- 13, 16. Size: total length of males up to 12.5 mm (specimens from Sweden), 10-11 mm (Roberts 1 985), of females up to 15.1 mm (from Sweden), 12-15 mm (Roberts 1985); carapace length of males up to 6.0 mm (Sweden), 5-5.5 mm (Wiehle 1931), of females up to 6.6 mm (Sweden), 6-6.5 mm (Wiehle 1931). Male palp: see Figs. 10-12, 16. 142 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 14 15 16 Figures 14-16.— Tip of conductor of Meta: 14, M. americana n. sp.; 15, M. manchurica n. sp.; 16, M. menardi (Latreille). Scale bars: 0.1 mm. Epigynum: see Fig. 13. Distribution.— Western Europe. Probably also North Africa (Algeria) and perhaps Middle East (Syria) (Roewer 1942; however, see Levy 1987). The northernmost known records are from Brit- ish Islands, including Ireland and Scotland (Locket et al. 1974), from the Arctic circle on Norwegian coast, central parts of Sweden and southwestern comer of Finland (Hippa et al. 1 984). The easternmost records are from Latvia, and from Moldova and other Transcarpathian areas (K. G. Mikhailov, unpubl. catalogue). Material examined. —Several males and females from Germany, Sweden and Norway (in the Institute of Bi- ological Problems of the North, Magadan, in the Swed- ish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, and in the Zoological Museum, University of Turku). Drawings of the material from (eastern) Germany, Hinter Sachs. Schweiz, Gr. Winterberg, S-Kuppe (420-490 m); June 1978, leg. S. Heimer. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank the following persons for material, discussions and other help: C. D. Don- dale & J. H. Redner (Ottawa), S. Heimer (Dres- den), T. Kronestedt (Stockholm), H. W. Levi (Harvard), D. M. Logunov (Novosibirsk), K. G. Mikhailov (Moscow) and N. 1. Platnick (New York). LITERATURE CITED Coddington, J.A. 1990. Ontogeny and homology in the male palpus of orb-weaving spiders and their relatives, with comments on phylogeny (Araneocla- da: Araneoidea, Deinopoidea). Smithsonian Contr. Zool., 496:1-52. Heimer, S. & W. Nentwig. 1982. Thoughts on the phylogeny of the Araneoidea Latreille, 1 806 (Arach- nida, Araneae). Zeitschr. Zool. Syst. Evol. Forsch., 20:284-295. Hippa, H., S. Koponen & R. Mannila. 1984. Inver- tebrates of Scandinavian caves. 1. Araneae, Opi- liones, and Pseudoscorpionida (Arachnida). Ann. Entomol. Fennici, 50:23-29. Levi, H. W. 1 980. The orb-weaver genus Mecynogea, the subfamily Metinae and the genera Pachygnatha, Glenognatha and Azilia of the subfamily Tetrag- nathinae north of Mexico (Araneae: Araneidae). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 149:1-74. Levi, H. W. 1986. The Neotropical orb-weaver gen- era Chrysometa and Homalometa (Araneae: Te- tragnathidae). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 151:91-215. Levy, G. 1987. Spiders of the genera Araniella, Zyg- iella, Zilla and Mangora (Araneae, Araneidae) from Israel, with notes on Metellina species from Leba- non. Zool. Scr., 16:243-257. Locket, G. H. & A. F. Millidge. 1953. British spiders 11. Ray Society, 13:1-449. Locket, G. H., A. F. Millidge & P. Merrett. 1974. British spiders III. Ray Society, 149:1-315. Marusik, Y. M. 1985. A systematic list of the orb- weaving spiders (Aranei: Araneidae, Tetragnathi- dae, Theridiosomatidae, Uloboridae) of the Euro- pean part of the USSR and the Caucasus. Trudy Zool. Inst. Leningrad, 139:135-140. Marusik, Y. M. 1986. A redescription of types of certain orb-weaving spiders (Araneidae, Tetrag- nathidae) from S. A. Spassky collection. Vest. Zool., 6:19-22. Palmgren, P. 1978. Taxonomic position of the genus Meta (Araneida). Ann. Zool. Fennici, 15:241-242. Pennington, B.J. 1979. The colour patterns of diurnal Meta menardi (Latreille). Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 4:392-393. Roberts, M. J. 1985. The spiders of Great Britain and Ireland. Vol I. Harley Books, Colchester. 229 PP- Roewer, C. 1942. Katalog der Araneae 1. Bremen. 1040 pp. MARUSIK & KOPONEN- REVIEW OF META, WITH TWO NEW SPECIES 143 Simon, E. 1929. Les Arachnides de France, 6:533- 772. Paris. Wiehle, H. 1931. Spinnentiere oder Arachnoidea. VI. Agelenidae - Araneidae. Tierwelt Deutschlands 23. 46 + 136 pp. Wunderlich, J. 1 986. Spinnenfauna gestem und heute: Fossile Spinnen in Bernstein und ihre heute leben- den Verwandten. Straubenhardt. 283 pp. Wunderlich, J. 1987. Die Spinnen der Kanarischen Inseln und Madeiras. Taxonomy & Ecology 1 (Lan- gen). 433 pp. Yaginuma, T. 1986. Taxonomic notes on Japanese spiders. (II): Araneus, Neoscona, Metellina, Cispius, Heptathela. Fac. Let. Rev. Otemon Gakuin Univ., 20:187-200. Manuscript received April 1991, revised September 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:144-145 RESEARCH NOTES COHABITATION OF SIX SPECIES OF SPIDERS IN WEBS OF CYRTOPHORA MOLUCCENSIS (ARANEAE, ARANEIDAE) IN MOOREA, FRENCH POLYNESIA Webs of colonial spiders often harbor many species of spiders in addition to the original ar- chitects of the web (Buskirk 1982). On Moorea (French Polynesia) I noticed several different species in webs of the colonial spider Cyrtophora moiuccensis (Doleschall) (Araneidae). On 26-28 April 1991,1 collected all inhabitants of five small colonies and found five species in addition to C moiuccensis (Table 1). Leucauge granulataQNal- ckenaer)(Araneidae) built its own webs entirely or partially supported by the frame threads of the colonial spider’s web. Pholcus ancoralis L. Ivoch (Pholcidae) also built its own web, but did so in the upper barrier web of C. moiuccensis. Tangaroa tahitiensis (Berland)(Uloboridae) con- structed its own web, typically in the lower bar- rier web and sometimes on the frame threads. I found Argyrodes argentatus O.P. -Cambridge (Theridiidae) in all parts of the colonial web but failed to note whether it built its own webs. Also, I did not notice whether the single specimen of Theridion adamsoni Berland (Theridiidae) con- structed its own web. Argyrodes argentatus has been found in C. moiuccensis webs on the Pacific island of Yap (Berry 1987), and its congeners are common kleptoparasites in the webs of other colonial and noncolonial spiders (Kaston 1 965). The other four species are not known to be frequent residents of webs other than their own (J. Beatty, pers. commun.). However, Rypstra (1979) and Lubin (1974) noted Leucauge species building webs at- tached to the guylines of Cyrtophora citricola (ForskAal) and C. moiuccensis colonies, respec- tively. Archaearanea tepidariorum (C. L. Koch) (reported as Theridion tepidariorum) has been found in C. citricola webs as well (Kaston 1965). Within the Uloboridae, Uloborus species cohabit with Cyrtophora and another colonial spider, Stegodyphus sarasinorum Karsch (Rypstra 1 979). Jackson & Rowe (1987) describe Pholcus ancor- alis as a web-invading spider, but did not find it in Cyrtophora webs. Spiders that inhabit colonial spiders’ webs may be obligatory kleptoparasites (e.g., many Argy- rodes species) or facultative commensals that build their own food-capturing webs within those of the social spider. Cohabitation of the second type may be selected for in habitats where good web sites are rare (Buskirk 1986) or in which disturbances like rain or falling leaves are com- mon (Riechert et al. 1986); here webs of the co- habiting species may gain protection from their location within the sturdier web of the social spider. Sharing webs also reduces the cost of silk production for the cohabiting spider (e. g., Jakob 1991). Finally, the large size of colonial spider webs allows them to occupy open spaces that are high in insect traffic (Lubin 1974), and cohabi- tants may benefit from this access to prey. With Table 1.— Spiders found in five webs of Cyrtophora moiuccensis near Paopao, Moorea, French Polynesia. Juvenile males were recognized by their swollen palps. Juvenile C. moiuccensis that were as large or larger than males were termed juvenile females and their number is shown in parentheses next to that of juvenile males. Adults Juveniles Total Males Females Males Unsexed Cyrtophora moiuccensis 13 7 6(25) 35 86 Argyrodes argentatus 3 10 8 19 40 Leucauge granulata 0 3 0 8 11 Pholcus ancoralis 5 3 0 20 28 Theridion adamsoni 0 1 0 0 1 Tangaroa tahitiensis 4 11 4 52 71 144 RESEARCH NOTES 145 the exception of A. argentatus (if it is an oblig- atory kleptoparasite), web cohabitation by so many species on Moorea may have been en- couraged by environmental conditions. I col- lected webs near the end of the rainy season, and storms that brought down both rain and bits of vegetation were common. The web of C. mol- uccensis is very strong (Lubin 1974); by building within its confines the other species could use it as a framework that could both withstand the blows of falling objects and could deflect these objects from their own frailer webs. It would be interesting to determine whether cohabitation is a less common occurrence during Moorea’s dry season. I thank managers Rick and Bonnie Steger and the directorship of the University of California, Berkeley, Field Station for access to their prop- erty, and James Fullard for providing room and board. Joe Beatty kindly identified the spiders, and both he and Yael Lubin improved the manu- script with their reviews. Research was funded by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) 1967 Science and Engineering Scholarship to H. C. P., and an NSERC Operating Grant from the University of Toronto to James Fullard. LITERATURE CITED Berry, J. W. 1987. Notes on the life history and be- havior of the communal spider Cyrtophora mol- uccensis (Doleschall) (Araneae, Araneidae) in Yap, Caroline Islands. J. ArachnoL, 15:309-319. Buskirk, R. E. 1982. Sociality in the Arachnida. Pp. 28 1-367, In Social Insects. Vol. II. (H. R. Hermann, ed.). Academic Press, London. Buskirk, R. E. 1986. Orb-weaving spiders in aggre- gations modify individual web structure. J. Arach- noL, 14:259-265. Jackson, R. R. & R. J. Rowe. 1987. Web-invasion and araneophagy by New Zealand and Australian social spiders. New Zealand J. Zook, 14:139-140. Jakob, E. M. 1991. Costs and benefits of group living for pholcid spiderlings: losing food, saving silk. Anim. Behav., 41:711-722. Kaston, B. J. 1965. Some little known aspects of spider behavior. American Midi. Natur., 73:336- 356. Lubin, Y. D. 1974. Adaptive advantages and the evo- lution of colony formation in Cyrtophora (Araneae: Araneidae). Zook J. Linn. Soc., 54:321-339. Riechert, S. E., R. Roeloffs, & A. C. Echtemacht. 1986. The ecology of the cooperative spider Agelena con- sociata in Equatorial Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). J. Arachnok, 14:201-217. Rypstra, A. L. 1979. Foraging flocks of spiders: a study of aggregate behavior in Cyrtophora citricola ForskAal (Araneae; Araneidae) in West Africa. Be- hav. Ecok Sociobiok, 5:291-300. Manuscript received November 1991, revised January 1992. Heather C. Proctor*: Department of Zoology, Erindale College, University of Toronto, Mis- sissauga, Ontario, L5L 1C6 Canada. 'Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4 Canada. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:146-147 WEB-MONITORING FORCE EXERTED BY THE SPIDER WAITKERA WAITAKERENSIS (ULOBORIDAE) The purpose of this study is to determine if the resting force expressed by the primitive, orb- weaver Waitkera waitakerensis (Chamberlain 1946) is similar to that of the orb-weaver Ulo- borus glomosus (Walckenaer 1841) and less than that of the triangle-weaver Hyptiotes cavatus (Hentz 1847) (Opell 1987a). This is important because Opell (1987a) used U. glomosus to rep- resent orb-weavers in a study which concluded that triangle-web spiders exert more force on a horizontal resting line than do orb-weavers. I chose the monotypic genus Waitkera for this study because it is one of the two most primitive members of the uloborid clade that is a sister clade of the larger assemblage that includes Ulo- borus, Hyptiotes, and Miagrammopes (Codding- ton 1990). Unlike members of the other primi- tive orb-weaving genus Tangaroa, which are very small (Opell 1983), W. waitakerensis is similar in size to the aforementioned genera (Table 1). Like members of these genera, this species has a well developed tracheal system, characterized by tracheae that pass through the pedicel and enter the legs (Opell 1979, 1987b), a pattern consid- ered plesiomorphic for the family Uloboridae. Like U. glomosus, W. waitakerensis hangs be- neath the hub of its web with legs extended, while it waits for prey to strike its web (Opell pers. obs.). Therefore, although U. glomosus and W. waitakerensis are phylogenetically distant, there are no morphological or behavioral features that suggest their resting forces should greatly differ. Following the methods described by Opell (1987a), I used a glass needle strain gauge to measure the resting forces expressed by adult fe- male W. waitakerensis. This species is found only on New Zealand’s north island (Opell 1979), where I studied two populations, one in a city park in Hamilton (sample size 36) and another from the Waitakere Mountains near Piha (sam- ple size 19). I recorded the temperature at which each force measurement was taken and the live weight of each spider. These data were compared with those of adult female U. glomosus and H. cavatus, as measured by Opell (1987a). Using a Shapiro-Wilk W-statistic, I first de- termined if the resting forces of each population or species were normally distributed. If they were, I used a t test {i) to compare means; if they were not, I used a Wilcoxon 2-sample test (W). Except for the temperature at which force measurements were taken, all values from the Hamilton and Piha populations of W. waitakerensis were sim- ilar (Weight: t, P = 0.178; Force: t, P ^ 0.267; Force/weight: W, P = 0.2 1 2). Mean temperatures were very similar (22.44 ±1.44 °C and 23.00 ±0.00 °C, respectively) and their statistical dif- ference (W, P = 0.03 1) is attributable to the uni- form temperature at which the Piha population was measured. Therefore, the following com- parisons combine the values of the two W. wai- takerensis populations. Table 1 compares the absolute and weight- specific resting forces of the three species. The mean resting force of W. waitakerensis is greater than that of U. glomosus {t, P = 0.016) but did not differ from that of H. cavatus {t, P = 0.052). The weight-specific resting force of W. waitak- erensis Q. 25 X 10“5 N/mg greater than that of U. glomosus (W, P = 0.004) and 0.77 x 10“^ N/mg less than that of H. cavatus (W, P = 0.000 1). The mean temperatures at which the resting force of U. glomosus and H. cavatus were measured were nearly identical (Table 1) and that at which W. waitakerensis was measured was only 2.5 °C lower. Therefore, it is unlikely that temperature Table 1.— Comparison of the weights and resting forces of three uloborid species. Mean ± standard deviation (sample size is indicated by boldface). Uloborus glomosus Waitkera waitakerensis Hyptiotes cavatus Live weight (mg) Resting force (10~'* Newtons) Resting force/live weight (10^^ N/mg) Temperature (°C) 9.93 ± 4.65 (45) 1.07 ± 0.30(40) 1.21 ± 0.29 (40) 25.0 ± 0.7 (45) 8.92 ± 2.52 (55) 1.21 ± 0.26(57) 1.46 ± 0.41 (55) 22.6 ± 1.2 (57) 6.76 ± 3.05 (42) 1.34 ± 0.37 (42) 2.23 ± 0.69 (42) 25.2 ± 0.9 (42) 146 RESEARCH NOTES 147 differences had a major influence on the observed differences in resting forces. The weight-specific resting force expressed by JV. waitakerensis is intermediate between and statistically different from those of the orb-weav- er U. glomosus and the triangle-weaver H. ca- vatus. However, the weight-specific forces of the two phylogenetically distant orb-weaving ulo- borids are more similar to one another than ei- ther is to that of H. cavatus. This upholds Opell’s (1987a) conclusion that triangle-web uloborids that actively monitor their webs express more web-monitoring force than do orb-weaving ulo- borids that hang from the hubs of their webs while waiting for prey to strike. However, the fact that W. waitakerensis expresses greater weight-specific resting force than U. glomosus may indicate a trend toward the reduction of web-monitoring forces within orb-weaving ulo- borids. Support for this is found in the reduced tracheal systems of members of the higher orb- weaving uloborid genera Daramuliana, Octo- noba, Phiioponella, Ponella, Purumitra, and Zo- sis {Opdl 1979, 1987b). James E. Carrel and Edward K. Tillinghast made helpful suggestions on this manuscript. I am grateful to Denis and Jill Gibbs for their hos- pitality during my stay in Hamilton and to Denis Gibbs for showing me where W. waitakerensis could be found. Permission to collect this species in the Waitakere Ranges Centennial Memorial Park was granted by the Auckland Regional Council Parks Committee. This study was sup- ported by National Science Foundation grant No. BSR-8917935. LITERATURE CITED Coddington, J. A. 1990. Ontogeny and homology in the male palpus of orb-weaving spiders and their relatives, with comments on phylogeny (Araneocla- da: Araneoidea, Deinopoidea). Smithsonian Contr. Zool., 496:1-52. Opell, B. D. 1979. Revision of the genera and tropical American species of the spider family Uloboridae. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 148:433-549. Opell, B. D. 1983. A review of the genus Tangaroa (Araneae, Uloboridae). J. Arachnol., 11:287-295. Opell, B. D. 1987a. Changes in web-monitoring forc- es associated with web reduction in the spider family Uloboridae. Canadian J. Zool., 65:1028-1034. Opell, B. D. 1 987b. The influence of web monitoring tactics upon the tracheal systems of spiders in the family Uloboridae. Zoomorphology, 107:255-259. Opell, B. D. 1990. The relationship of book lung and tracheal systems in the spider family Uloboridae. J. Morph., 206:211-216. Brent D. Opell: Department of Biology, Vir- ginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univer- sity, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 USA. Manuscript received January 1992, revised April 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:148-150 STEP-COUPLED FLUCTUATIONS IN PROSOMAL PRESSURE MAY CONSTRAIN STEPPING RATES IN WHIPSCORPIONS (UROPYGI) Giant whipscorpions, Mastigoproctus gigan- teus (Lucas) (Uropygi), tend to walk slowly, using step cycle periods of about one second or longer, and do not maintain shorter step periods even when stimulated to move faster (Shultz 1992). Results from a recent electrophysiological study (Shultz 1991) suggest a possible explanation for this preference. Whipscorpions lack extensor muscles at the femur-patella joint (Shultz 1989) but extend this joint with hydraulic pressure gen- erated through compression of the prosoma. Baseline prosomal pressure at preferred step pe- riods is maintained at about 60 torr above min- imum resting pressure, but there is also a cyclical pressure fluctuation superimposed on the ele- vated or ‘active’ baseline (Fig. I). This fluctua- tion, which may have a peak amplitude as high as 20 torr over the active baseline, is apparently caused by rapid flexion of the femur-patella joint in members of the fourth leg pair during the re- covery phase (protraction) of their step cycles (Shultz 1991). I hypothesize that by maintaining their preferred step periods, whipscorpions avoid flexing the femur-patella joint of one member of the fourth leg pair against the pressure surge caused by flexion in the other member and there- by minimize the mechanical and energetic inef- ficiencies of hydraulic locomotion. This paper refines quantitative predictions of the hypothesis and presents preliminary supporting evidence derived from a frequency distribution of step pe- riods. Referring to Fig. 1 , the hypothesis predicts that whipscorpions should prefer a step period (T) in which the decay time (hysteresis) of the pressure surge (D) is less than the time between the end of protraction in one member of the fourth leg pair and the beginning of protraction in the other (At). To ascertain empirically, one can de- termine the difference between By (the lag time between the onset of protraction in one member of the fourth leg pair and the onset of protraction in the other for a given step period) and Ct (the duration of protraction for a given step period). Thus for a given step period (T) (1) At = Bt-Ct Actual values for Bx and Cj were determined from kinematic and electrophysiological analy- ses of walking whipscorpions. Video analysis re- vealed that members of the fourth leg pair step 1 80'’ out of phase at all step periods (Shultz 1991), as is typical of segmental leg pairs in arthropods. Thus By, the time between the onset of protrac- tion in one leg and the onset of protraction of the other, is always equal to about one half the step period; that is, B^ = 0.5T. The value Q, the duration of protraction for a given step period, was determined by con- ducting a least-squares regression analysis on se- lected electromyographic parameters of the tro- chanter-femur levator and depressor muscles within one member of the fourth leg pair. The levator and depressor are antagonistic muscles, with the levator activating at the onset of pro- traction (recovery phase) and the depressor ac- tivating at the onset of retraction (propulsive phase). Levator cycle duration was regarded as the step period (T) and represented the indepen- dent variable. The time between activation of the levator and activation of the depressor was regarded as the duration of protraction (Q) and represented the dependent variable. All mea- surements were made in seconds and were ac- curate to ±0.005 s. Least-squares analysis of 340 steps from four individuals produced the regres- sion equation Ct = 0.309T ± 0.024 (r^ = 0.86). Empirically derived values for Bt and Ct were then substituted into Equation 1 (2) At = 0.5T - (0.309T ± 0.024) = 0.191T - 0.024 The hypothesis predicts that whipscorpions should prefer step periods in which At is greater than D, the decay time of the step-coupled pres- sure surge. Thus the minimum preferred step period can be predicted by substituting the em- pirically derived value of D for At in Equation 2 and then solving the equation for T. The value for D was determined by recording prosomal 148 RESEARCH NOTES 149 m I \/VA/\/VA/^ R4 L4 Aj I — I Bj [— I Cj I I J ► TIME Figure 1 . — Diagram illustrating the relationship between step-coupled fluctuations in prosomal pressure and stepping pattern of the fourth leg pair. Each pressure surge is caused by flexion of the femur-patella joint in one of the fourth walking legs during the recovery phase of the step cycle. The pressure surges labled ‘L’ are caused by flexion of the left fourth leg (L4) and those labled ‘R’ are caused by flexion in the right fourth leg (R4). The time needed for the pressure surge to decay is indicated by ‘D’. In the step diagram for R4 and L4, the black bars represent periods of retraction (propulsive phase) and the open regions represent protraction (recovery phase). Variables associated with the step diagram include Aj (time between end of protraction in one of the fourth legs and beginning of protraction in the other at step period T), (time between beginning of protraction in one of the fourth legs and beginning of protraction in the other at step period T) and Cj (duration of protraction in the fourth leg pair at step period T). The hypothesis developed here predicts that whipscorpions should prefer step cycles (T) in which D is less than A^, where Aj = Bj - C^. At step periods where D is greater than A^, pressure surges will overlap causing an increase in the pressure baseline and requiring greater exertion by flexor muscles. pressure from a freely walking whipscorpion through a pressure transducer affixed to the ar- throdial membrane of the femur-patella joint in leg 1 (see Shultz 1991 for details). Pressure decay times were measured in 1 7 steps where step pe- riod was sufficiently long that the pressure surge decayed to the active pressure baseline. Mean decay time of the pressure surge was found to be 0.130 s (SE = 0.006). This value was then sub- stituted for Aj in Equation 2, and the equation was solved for T. On the basis of these data, the hypothesis predicts that whipscorpions should prefer step periods greater than about 0.80 s. This prediction was compared to a frequency distribution of step periods {n — 483) from elec- tromyographic records of seven whipscorpions. The structure of the distribution is consistent with the predictions of the hypothesis (Fig. 2). The number of steps with Tong’ cycle periods (i.e., greater than 0.8 s) is substantially greater than those with ‘short’ cycle periods (i.e., less than 0.8 s). More importantly, a preference for ‘long’ over ‘short’ step periods is suggested by a pronounced increase in the frequency of steps in the 0.80-0.89 s range compared to the 0.70-0.79 s range. These results are consistent with the hypoth- esis that Mastigoproctus uses long step periods to avoid mechanical and energetic inefficiencies associated with flexing the femur-patella joint of one member of the fourth leg pair against high prosomal pressures generated by flexion in the 150 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY PERIOD (sec) Figure 2. — Frequency distribution of step cycle pe- riods representing 483 steps from seven whipscor- pions. The hypothesis developed here predicts that whipscorpions should prefer step periods longer than 0.80 s. The structure of the frequency distribution is consistent with this prediction, but this comparison cannot be regarded as a statistical test of the hypothesis. other. If whipscorpions were to walk at shorter step periods (i.e., higher speeds), step-coupled pressure surges would overlap thereby increasing the active baseline pressure and requiring greater forces from the flexor muscles. It is not known whether these results apply to spiders and other arachnids that use hydraulic pressure for leg ex- tension. I thank Abbot S. Gaunt, Thomas E. Hether- ington and R. Z. German for equipment loans. This research was supported by grants-in-aid of research from the Exline-Frizzell Fund for Ar- achnological Research (California Academy of Sciences) and Sigma Xi. LITERATURE CITED Shultz, J. W. 1989. Morphology of locomotor ap- pendages in Arachnida: evolutionary trends and phylogenetic implications. Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 97: 1-56. Shultz, J. W. 1991. Evolution of locomotion in Arachnida: the hydraulic pressure pump of the giant whipscorpion, Mastigoproctus giganteus (Uropygi). J. Morph. 210:13-31. Shultz, J. W. 1992. Muscle firing patterns in two arachnids using different methods of propulsive leg extension. J. Exp. Biol., 162:313-329. Jeffrey W. Shultz: Department of Biological Sci- ences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0006, USA Manuscript received March 1991, revised November 1991. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:151-152 FEMALE SPIDERS (ARANEAE: DIPLURIDAE, DESIDAE, LINYPHIIDAE) EAT THEIR OWN EGGS Some spiders may eat the eggs of other spiders (Hallas 1988; Willey & Adler 1989; Jackson 1990), but female spiders have rarely been re- ported to consume their own eggs. Shaw (1989) observed an egg-guarding female of Clubiona re- clusa O. P.-Cambridge (Clubionidae) consume half of her eggs, and Downes (1987) observed females of the genus Crossopriza, presumably C. lyoni, (Pholcidae) consuming one or more of their eggs. We observed females of three additional ara- neomorph species, Florinda coccinea (Hentz) (Linyphiidae), Ixeuticus martins (Simon) (Desi- dae) and Ixeuticus robustus (L. Koch) (Desidae), and one mygalomorph species, Thelechoris stria- tipes (Simon) (Dipluridae), consuming entire clutches of their own eggs and all egg-sac silk (Table 1). Some of these oophagous females also produced other egg sacs, both fertile and infertile, that were not consumed and, as noted in Table 1 , the sequence of oviposition of these sacs was variable. All of the egg-eating females of F. coc- cinea, /. martins and I. robustus had mated once, but we do not know whether the T. striatipes females had mated. Florinda coccinea females (n = 66) were re- moved from their egg sacs within 1 2 h of con- struction, and I. martins (« = 21) and 1. robustus {n = 13) females were removed from their egg sacs within 72 h of construction; therefore, ad- ditional oophagous events might occur when fe- males are allowed constant access to their sacs. Thelechoris striatipes {n= 13) females remained with their egg sacs until spiderling emergence, and emergence required 14 days and 17 days for two clutches where developmental time was cal- culated. Gravid F. coccinea females were collected by MBW on 8 May 1989 in Clemson, South Car- olina, and maintained in the laboratory (26 ± 2 °C, 65 ± 4% relative humidity, 14L:10D pho- toperiod) in Clemson. Spiders were held indi- vidually in plastic containers (3.7 cm deep x 5.2 cm diameter). The first female of F. coccinea to consume her eggs was field-collected; the second was an F2 female reared and mated in the lab- oratory. Gravid I. martins and I. robustus fe- males were collected by MBW in April 1991 in Christchurch, New Zealand, and maintained in- dividually in 4.5 cm deep x 9.75 cm diameter plastic containers in the laboratory in Clemson; the five females that consumed eggs were from the F2 generation. All females of the above spe- cies were given constant access to moist cotton, were fed daily, and were offered a variety of prey, including German cockroaches, house flies, and tachinid flies. The T. striatipes females were collected by FAC on 15 April 1989 in Kenya, Africa (Tsavo West National Park at Kitani Lodge) and maintained in 31 cm length x 16 cm width x 8 cm deep plastic shoe boxes in the laboratory (24 ± 2 °C, 1 2L: 1 2D photoperiod) in Cullowhee, North Car- olina. These spiders were fed one Tenebrio larva every 10 days, occasionally supplemented by cricket nymphs or house flies. Spiders had con- stant access to moist cotton. Because web construction and oviposition be- havior of the four species were similar to these behaviors in the field, we did not add substrata to any containers. All females attached their webs to the sides of the containers. In nature, F. coccinea constructs sheet webs in low vegetation and oviposits among the vege- tation, rather than retaining egg sacs in the web. Spiders drop from their webs when disturbed, so females could possibly contact their sacs in the vegetation. In the laboratory, egg sacs were con- structed in the bottom of the container, and fe- males did not remain in close proximity to their egg sacs. Ixeuticus martins females live in funnel retreats in crevices and construct their egg sacs within the retreat (Forster 1970). Ixeuticus ro- bustus females also live in funnel retreats in crev- ices, and it is likely that they construct egg sacs within the retreat because females in the labo- ratory remain in close contact with their egg sacs. Both /. martins and 7. robustus females have been observed killing prey and then moving away from the prey to allow their spiderlings to feed (MBW, pers. obs.), so it is likely that females remain in contact with their spiderlings in nature. In nature, T. striatipes females live in perennial funnel webs, construct their egg sacs in the wall of their tubular silken retreats, and remain with the brood through spiderling emergence and dis- 151 152 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1.— Oophagy by Thelechoris striatipes (Dipluridae), Florinda coccinea (Linyphiidae), Ixeuticus martins (Desidae) and Ixeuticus robustus (Desidae). a = unknown which day within given range the eggs were consumed, b = Fertile (F), Infertile (I), Consumed (*), c = females were sacrificed within a month after the egg sacs were consumed. Under I. robustus, female #2 produced and ate two sacs. Species and female identification Date of oviposition of consumed sacs Date of consumption Sequence of sacs produced* Thelechoris striatipes'^ 1 10 July 1989 10-11 July 1989 ♦ 2 12 July 1989 15-20 July 1989 * 3 18 July 1989 18-20 July 1989 * Florinda coccinea 1 16 May 1989 16-19 May 1989 *,F,F,F,I,I,I 2 6 Aug. 1989 7 Aug. 1989 F,*,F,F Ixeuticus martins 1 26 Nov. 1989 26-29 Nov. 1991 2 2 Jan. 1992 2-4 Jan. 1992 F,F,I,I,F,F,*,I,I,I 3 23 April 1992 24-28 April 1992 I, I, I,* Ixeuticus robustus 1 26 Nov. 1991 26-30 Nov. 1991 F,F,*,F,F 2 13 Dec. 1991 13-18 Dec. 1991 *,*,F,F,F,I 2 23 Dec. 1991 23-27 Dec. 1991 persal (FAC, pers. obs.). In the laboratory, fe- males constructed capture webs and retreats in the shoe box arenas. Spiders captured prey in these webs, and often constructed egg sacs in their retreats and spent much of their inactive time upon or near the sacs. The egg-eating behavior we observed was pos- sibly triggered by abnormal conditions associ- ated with captivity and is rarely, if ever, practiced in nature. However, if oophagy were directed toward infertile, damaged, or otherwise inviable eggs, it could be an adaptive strategy to recycle nutrients and thereby decrease losses. We do not know whether the consumed eggs were fertile, and we have no evidence that females are capable of detecting whether their eggs are fertile. How- ever, the fact that several of the infertile clutches produced by four of the oophagous females were not consumed (Table 1) suggests that oophagy has not evolved as a consistent response to clutch infertility. We thank P. H. Adler, L. Higgins, and P. A. Zungoli for reviewing the manuscript. This is technical contribution No. 3291 of the South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Clem- son University. LITERATURE CITED Downes, M. F. 1987. Crossopriza {lyonil) (Araneae, Pholcidae) eats her own eggs. J. Arachnol., 15:276. Forster, R. R. 1970. The spiders of New Zealand, Part III. Otago Museum Bulletin No. 3, Dunedin, New Zealand. 1 84 pp. Hallas, S. E. A. 1988. The ontogeny of behaviour in Portia fimbriata, P. labiata, and P. schultzi, web- building jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). J. Zool., London, 215:231-238. Jackson, R. R. 1990. Predatory versatility and intra- specific interactions in Cyrba algerina and Cyrba ocellata, web-invading spartaeine jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). New Zealand J. Zool., 17:157- 168. Shaw, M. R. 1989. Why did a Clubiona reclusa eat her own eggs? Newsl. British Arachnol. Soc., 56:6,7. Willey , M. B. & P. H. Adler. 1989. Biology of Peu- cetia viridans (Araneae, Oxyopidae) in South Car- olina, with special reference to predation and ma- ternal care. J. Arachnol., 17:275-284. Marianne B. Willey: Department of Entomol- ogy, 1 14 Long Hall, Clemson University, Box 340365, Clemson, South Carolina, 29634-0365 USA Frederick A. Coyle: Department of Biology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina 28723 USA Manuscript received May 1992, revised July 1992. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Manuscripts are preferred in English but may be accepted in Spanish, French or Portuguese subject to availability of appropriate reviewers. Authors whose primary language is not English, may consult the Associate Editor for assistance in obtaining help with English manuscript preparation. All man- uscripts should be prepared in general accordance with the current edition of the Council of Biological Editors (CBE) Style Manual unless instructed otherwise below. Authors are ad- vised to consult a recent issue of the Journal of Arachnology for additional points of style. Send three identical copies of the typed material together with copies of illustrations to: Gary L. Miller, Associate Editor The Journal of Arachnology Department of Biology The University of Mississippi University, Mississippi 38677 USA Telephone: (601) 232-7495 FAX: (601) 232-5144 Bitnet: BYMILLER@UMSVM Correspondence relating to manuscripts should also be di- rected to the Associate Editor. Manuscripts longer than 1 500 words should be prepared as Feature Articles, shorter papers as Research Notes. FEATURE ARTICLES Title page.— Place in the upper left comer the complete name, address, and telephone number of the author with whom proofs and correspondence should be exchanged. Include FAX num- bers and Bitnet addresses if available. Four lines below, type the title, centered, all in capital letters. Another four lines be- low, beginning with the left margin, type each author’s name on a new line followed by the address. Abstract.— The heading should be placed at the beginning of the first paragraph set off by a period. In articles written in English, a second abstract in an acceptable language may be included pertinent to the nationality of the author(s) or geo- graphic region(s) emphasized in the article. A second abstract in English must be included in articles not written in the latter language. Text.— Double-space text, tables, legends, etc. throughout. Three levels of heads are used. The first level (METHODS, RESULTS, etc.) is typed in capitals and on a separate line. The second level head begins a paragraph with an indent and is separated from the text by a period and a dash. The third level may or may not begin a paragraph but is underscored and separated from the text by a colon. Use only the underline method to indicate italics; DO NOT USE WORD PROCES- SOR ITALICS CODES. Use the metric system unless quoting text or referencing collection data. All decimal fractions are indicated by the period regardless of language of the text. Citation of references in the text.— Include within parenthe- ses the surnames of the author(s) followed by the date of pub- lication. A comma separates multiple citations by the same author(s) and a semicolon separates citations by different au- thors, e.g., (Smith 1970), (Jones 1988; Smith 1989), (Smith 1986, 1987; Smith & Jones 1989; Jones et al. 1989). Literature cited section.— Use the following style: Lombardi, S. J. & D. L. Kaplan. 1990. The amino acid composition of major ampullate gland silk (dragline) of Ne- phila clavipes (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J. Arachnol., 18: 297-306. Kraffit, B. 1982. The significance and complexity of com- munication in spiders. Pp. 1 5-66, In Spider Communica- tions: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance. (P. N. Witt & J. S. Rovner, eds.). PrincetonUniversity Press, Princeton. Footnotes. — Footnotes are only permitted on the first printed page to indicate current address or other information con- cerning the author(s). All footnotes are placed together on a separate manuscript page. Running head.— Author sumame(s) and an abbreviated title must be typed all in caps and must not exceed 60 characters and spaces. The running head is placed by itself on a separate manuscript page. Taxonomic articles.— Consult a recent taxonomic article in the Journal of Arachnology for style or contact the Associate Editor. Tables.— Each table, with the legend above, should be placed on a separate manuscript page. Only the appropriate horizontal lines should be included. Use no footnotes; instead, include all information in the legend. Make notations in the text mar- gins to indicate the preferred location of tables in the printed text. Illustrations.— Original art work should be kept by the au- thor(s) until final acceptance for publication. All art work must be mounted on stiffboard ready for reproduction. In line draw- ings, pay particular attention to width of lines and size of lettering when reductions are to be made by the printer. Mul- tiple photos assembled on a single plate should be mounted with only a minimum of space separating them. In the case of multiple illustrations mounted together, each illustration must be numbered sequentially rather than given an alphabetic se- quence. Written on the back should be the name(s) of author(s) and an indication of top edge. The author should indicate whether the figure should be one column or two columns in width. The overall dimensions should be no more than 1 1 inches (28 cm) x 14 inches (36 cm). Larger drawings present greater difficulty in shipping and greater risks of damage for which the JOA assumes no responsibility. The author is en- couraged to consider PMT (PhotoMechanical Transfer) repro- ductions for large drawings and to consult an Editor for details on appropriate reductions. Make notations in the text margins to indicate the preferred position of illustrations in the printed text. Legends for illustrations should be placed together on the same page(s) and separate from the illustrations. Adhere to the following styles: Figures \-4.—A-us x-us, male from Timbuktu: 1, left leg; 2, right chelicera; 3, dorsal aspect of genitalia; 4, ventral aspect of abdomen. Figures 27-34.— Right chelicerae of species of A-us from Timbuktu: 27, 29, 3 1 , 33, dorsal views; 28, 30, 32, 34, prolater- al views of moveable finger; 27, 28, A-us x-us, holotype male; 29, 30, A-us, w-us, holotype male; 31, 32, A-us z-us, holotype male; 33, 34, A-us y-us, male. Scales = 1.0 mm. Assemble manuscript for mailing.— Assemble the separate sections or pages in the following sequence; title page, abstract, text, figure legends, footnotes, running head, tables with leg- ends, figures. Page charges and reprints.- The current charge per journal page will be assessed as follows: $50— nonmembers, $45 — members with grant, institutional, or other support for page costs; $25— regular members who do not have support for page costs; $20— student members who do not author with full members and who do not have support. Reprints are available only from the printer at current costs. Waiver of Page Charges.— The Editor will consider requests for a waiver of page charges for manuscripts which have been accepted for publication. Requests should be made in writing and should be submitted to the Associate Editor along with the final revision of the manuscript. The author must certify that neither grant nor institutional funds are available to cover all of the publication costs. The Society will normally agree to waive up to a maximum of 80% of the page charges, contingent on the availability of funds; the author is expected to find alternative sources for the remainder. RESEARCH NOTES Instructions above pertaining to feature articles apply also to research notes except that abstracts and most headings are not used and the byline follows the Literature Cited section. CONTENTS THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY VOLUME 20 Feature Articles NUMBER 2 Temporal and spatial segregation of web-building in a community of orb- weaving spiders, David Ward and Yael Lubin 73 Habitat segregation by species of Metaphidippus (Araneae: Salticidae) in Minnesota, Bruce Cutler and Daniel T. Jennings 88 Developmental plasticity and fecundity in the orb-weaving spider Nephila clavipes, Linden E. Higgins 94 Ballooning: Data from spiders in freefall indicate the importance of posture, Robert B. Suter 107 A revision of some species of Roncus L. Koch (Neobisiidae, Pseudoscor- piones) from North America and South Europe, Bozidar P. M. Curcic, Rajko N. Dimitrijevic, and Ozren S. Karamata 114 Notes on mating and reproductive success of Ceropelma longisternalis (Ara- neae, Theraphosidae) in captivity, Fernando G. Costa and Fernando Perez-Miles 129 Descripcion del macho de Achaearanea jequirituba (Araneae, Theridiidae), Alda Gonzalez 134 A review of Meta (Araneae, Tetragnathidae), with description of two new species, Yuri M. Marusik and Seppo Koponen 137 Research Notes Cohabitation of six species of spiders in webs of Cyrtophora moluccensis (Araneae, Araneidae) in Moorea, French Polynesia, Heather C. Proctor 144 Web-monitoring force exerted by the spider Waitkera waitakerensis (Ulo- boridae), Brent D. Opell 146 Step-coupled fluctuations in prosomal pressure may constrain stepping rates in whipscorpions (Uropygi), Jejfrey W. Shultz 148 Female spiders (Araneae: Dipluridae, Desidae, Linyphiidae) eat their own eggs, Marianne B. Willey and Frederick A. Coyle 151 L. :H)T The Journal of ARACHNOLOGY OFFICIAL ORGAN OF THE AMERICAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 20 1992 NUMBER 3 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY EDITOR: James W. Berry, Butler University ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Gary L. Miller, The University of Mississippi EDITORIAL BOARD: A. Cady, Miami (Ohio) Univ. at Middletown; J. E. Carrel, Univ. Missouri; J. A. Coddington, National Mus. Natural Hist.; J. C. Cokendolpher, Lubbock, Texas; F. A. Coyle, Western Carolina Univ.; C. D. Don- dale, Agriculture Canada; W. G. Eberhard, Univ. Costa Rica; M. E. Galiano, Mus. Argentine de Ciencias Naturales; M. H. Greenstone, BCIRL, Columbia, Missouri; N. V. Horner, Midwestern State Univ.; D. T. Jennings, Garland, Maine; V. F. Lee, California Acad. Sci.; H. W. Levi, Harvard Univ.; E. A. Maury, Mus. Argentine de Ciencias Naturales; N. 1. Platnick, American Mus. Natural Hist.; G. A. Polis, Vanderbilt Univ.; S. E. Riechert, Univ. Tennessee; A. L. Rypstra, Miami Univ., Ohio; M. H. Robinson, U.S. National Zool. Park; W. A. Shear, Hampden-Sydney Coll.; G. W. Uetz, Univ. Cincinnati; C. E. Valerio, Univ. Costa Rica. The Journal of Arachnology (ISSN 0160-8202), a publication devoted to the study of Arachnida, is published three times each year by The American Arach- nological Society. Memberships (yearly): Membership is open to all those inter- ested in Arachnida. Subscriptions to The Journal of Arachnology and American Arachnology (the newsletter), and annual meeting notices, are included with mem- bership in the Society. Regular, $30; Students, $20; Institutional, $80 (USA) or $90 (all other countries). Inquiries should be directed to the Membership Secretary (see below). Back Issues: Susan E. Riechert, Department of Zoology, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37916 USA. Undelivered Issues: Allen Press, Inc., 1041 New Hampshire Street, P.O. Box 368, Lawrence, Kansas 66044 USA. THE AMERICAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY PRESIDENT: Allen R. Brady (1991-1993), Biology Department, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49423 USA. PRESIDENT-ELECT: James E. Carico (1991-1993), Department of Biology, Lynchburg College, Lynchburg, Virginia 24501 USA. MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY: Norman 1. Platnick (appointed), American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, New York 10024 USA. TREASURER: Gail E. Stratton (1991-1993), Department of Biology, Albion College, Albion, Michigan 49224 USA. SECRETARY: Brent Opell (1991-1993), Department of Biology, Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 USA. ARCHIVIST: Vincent D. Roth, Box 136, Portal, Arizona 85632 USA. DIRECTORS: Matthew H. Greenstone (1990-1992), George W. Uetz (1991- 1993), Charles E. Griswold (1991-1993). HONORARY MEMBERS: C. D. Dondale, W. J. Gertsch, H. Homann, H. W. Levi, A. F. Millidge, M. Vachon, T. Yaginuma. Cover illustration: SEM photomicrograph of the ocularium of the opilionid Odiellus pictus (Wood). The species has a prominent trident of spines at the anterior border of its cephalothorax. Found in the eastern United States. Photo by Steven Murphree. Publication date: 2 April 1993 THIS PUBLICATION IS PRINTED ON ACID-FREE PAPER. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:153-156 SPIDER (ARANEAE) TAXA ASSOCIATED WITH MANTISPA VIRIDIS (NEUROPTERA: MANTISPIDAE) Jeffrey R. Brushwein', Kevin M. Hoffman and Joseph D. Culin: Department of Entomology, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0365 USA ABSTRACT. Egg sacs of 25 species of spiders in 14 families were found to contain immatures of Mantispa viridis in northwestern South Carolina, bringing the total spider taxa associated with this species to at least 29 species in 15 families. Thirty-one of the 124 M. viridis infested egg sacs had two or more mantispids in them. However, only three of these sacs produced two or more adult mantispids, with two sacs producing two adults each and the third sac producing four adults. Larvae of Mantispa viridis Walker, a member of the mantispid subfamily Mantispinae, are predators of spider eggs. First instars of M. viridis locate spider egg sacs and penetrate through the surrounding silk to gain access to the eggs, where- upon they develop through two additional and relatively immobile instars prior to pupation within the sac (Richardson 1976; Redborg & MacLeod 1985). Ten species of spiders in the families Agelenidae, Araneidae, Clubionidae, Ctenidae, Lycosidae, Theridiidae, and either the Clubionidae or Gnaphosidae have been associ- ated with M. viridis (Milliron 1940; Stein 1955; Parfin 1958; Valerio 1971; Tolbert 1976; Hieber 1984; Redborg & MacLeod 1985; Roble 1986; Hoffman & Brushwein 1 992). In the first reported rearing of mantispine lar- vae, Brauer (1869) noted that although more than one first instar of the European Mantispa styriaca (Poda) would enter single egg sacs in the labo- ratory, only one would develop to the adult. Lat- er, three to eight larvae of Eumantispa harmandi (Navas) were reported developing inside single egg sacs, although no information was given on larval survival or adult emergence (Kishida 1929; K. Kishida, pers. comm, in Bristowe 1932). Sub- sequent studies have documented the emer- gences of from two to seven adult mantispids from single egg sacs (McKeown & Mincham 1 948; Downes 1985; Monserrat & Diaz- Aranda 1989), including M. viridis (Parfin 1958; Richardson ‘Current address: 517 Lake Avenue, Lehigh Acres, Florida 33936 USA. 1 976; W. W. Tolbert, pers. comm, in Richardson 1976). Previous studies on M. viridis indicate that this species feeds on eggs of a broad taxonomic and ecological range of spiders and that more than one larva can successfully develop inside single egg sacs. The present paper reports the results of field studies conducted from 1982 through 1986 to document the spider taxa exploited by M. viridis in northwestern South Carolina, to deter- mine the frequency with which multiple larvae attack single egg sacs, and to determine the num- ber of adults which successfully develop in such multiply-infested sacs. METHODS Spider egg sacs and associated female spiders were collected from 1 982 through 1 986 by visual searching in various habitats within a 20 km radius of Clemson, South Carolina. The most frequently searched locations were wooded areas bordering Lake Hartwell and fields along South Carolina State Highway 123. Microhabitats sam- pled included foliage of hardwoods and conifers, ornamental shrubs, herbaceous vegetation, be- neath tree bark, on the surface of the ground, under stones and fallen logs, in burrows of Geo- lycosa sp. (Lycosidae), and the outside surfaces of various buildings. All egg sacs located during these searches were collected. Egg sacs were opened in the laboratory and examined with a stereomicroscope. Sacs with mantispids inside were retained and the number of larvae and co- coons present were recorded, and those without 153 154 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1. — Spider taxa associated with the immature stages of Mantispa viridis Walker. Taxa are arranged alphabetically, and incorporate taxonomic changes compiled by Platnick ( 1 989) and Dondale and Redner ( 1 990). Family Genus and species Reference Agelenidae Agelenopsis sp., prob. pennsylvanica (C. L. Koch) Parfin 1958 Agelenopsis sp. this report Anyphaenidae Teudis mordax (O. P. -Cambridge) this report Araneidae Araneus pegnia (Walckenaer) this report Araniella displicata (Hentz) this report Argiope aurantia Lucas Tolbert 1976, this report Argiope trifasciata (ForskSl) Tolbert 1976 Cyclosa turhinata (Walckenaer) this report Cyclosa sp., prob. turbinata this report Metepeira labyrinthea (Hentz) this report Neoscona arabesca (Walckenaer) this report unidentified genus, prob. Neoscona this report Clubionidae Cheiracanthium inclusum (Hentz) this report Clubiona sp. Hoffman and Brushwein 1992 Clubionidae or Gnaphosidae, undetermined Stein 1955 Corinnidae Castianeira sp. this report Ctenidae Cupiennius salei (Keyserling) Milliron 1940 Lycosidae Gladicosa pulchra (Keyserling) Roble 1986 Varacosa avara (Keyserling) Hoffman and Brushwein 1992 unidentified genus this report Oxyopidae Peiicetia viridans (Hentz) Fink 1968, 1987, this report Philodromidae Philodromus imbecillus Keyserling this report Pisauridae Pisanrina mira (Walckenaer) this report Salticidae Habronattus coecatus (Hentz) this report Phidippus clarus Keyserling this report Phidippus mystaceus (Hentz) this report Plexippus paykulli (Audouin) this report Tetragnathidae Tetragnatha sp. this report Theridiidae Achaearanea nipicola (Emerton) this report Achaearanea tepidariorum (C. L. Koch) Valerio 1971, this report Latrodectus mactans (Fabricius) this report Thomisidae Misumenoides fonnosipes (Walckenaer) this report Tmarus angidatus (Walckenaer) this report Uloboridae Uloborus glomosus (Walckenaer) this report mantispids were discarded. The numbers and identities of uninfested sacs were not recorded, but an estimated 350-700 egg sacs were exam- ined during the course of the study. Egg sacs with larvae were placed in larval rearing cells while mantispid cocoons were placed in vials designed for maintaining adult mantispids. Rearing con- tainers and environmental conditions were as described by Brushwein & Culin (1991). First instars of M. viridis were identified by the dorsal banding pattern on the thorax and abdomen, and second and third instars were identified by the characteristic shapes of the thoracic legs and tenth abdominal segments of each instar (Hoffman & Brushwein 1992). In cases where field-collected egg sacs which contained mantispids were not associated with female spiders but still contained viable eggs or spiderlings, surviving spiders were reared to ma- turity on a variety of larval Lepidoptera and adult Diptera. Rearing conditions and procedures were the same as those used to maintain adult man- tispids (Brushwein & Culin 1991). Spiders were identified by using the keys of Kaston (1948, 1978) and Roth (1985) and by comparison with previously identified specimens in the Clemson University Arthropod Collection (CUAC), De- partment of Entomology. Voucher specimens of immature and adult mantispids and the associ- ated spiders are deposited in the CUAC. BRUSH WEIN ET AL. -SPIDER ASSOCIATIONS OF M ANTISPA VIRIDIS 155 Table 2. — Incidence and magnitude of multiple infestations of single spider egg sacs by M. viridis immatures and the maximum number of adult mantispids reared per sac. Family Genus and species Number of sacs infested Number of sacs with > 1 Maximum Maximum number number inside sac of adults Agelenidae Agelenopsis sp. 58 21 16 1 Araneidae Argiope aurantia Lucas 4 1 5 1 Metepeira labyrinthea (Hentz) 21 3 2 1 Neoscona arabesca (Walckenaer) 1 1 2 1 unidentified, prob. Neoscona 1 1 4 4 Pisauridae Pisaurina mira (Walckenaer) 3 1 2 2 Salticidae Phidippus darns Keyserling 9 1 3 1 Theridiidae Latrodectus mactans (Fabricius) 6 2 2 2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Egg sacs of 1 24 spiders contained immatures of M. viridis in the Clemson area. These spiders belonged to 25 species in 23 genera representing 14 families, bringing the total spider taxa asso- ciated with M. viridis to at least 29 species in 26 genera from 15 families (Table 1). Three of the species were previously associated with M. vir- idis and 20 are newly associated, while the status of the unidentified species of Agelenopsis and of Lycosidae as previously or newly associated taxa can not be clarified in the absence of species- level identifications. Eight species had more than one egg sac associated with M. viridis. Six of these eight species had at least one egg sac infested with two or more immatures and are listed in Table 2. The other two species were the uniden- tified Cyclosa species with two singly-infested egg sacs in a single web and Peucetia viridans (Hentz) with two singly-infested sacs. Egg sacs containing more than one M. viridis larva were relatively common and accounted for 25% (31 of 124) of the total number of infested sacs (Table 2). However, multiple adults were reared from only 9.7% (3 of 3 1) of the multiply- infested sacs. Also, although as many as 1 6 im- matures were found inside single sacs, no more than four developed into adults from any one sac. Failure of larvae to develop in multiply- infested sacs was most likely due to either star- vation or intraspecific aggression. First instars become relatively immobile shortly after feeding commences and second and third instars possess very reduced legs. Therefore, developing larvae are trapped inside egg sacs and are vulnerable to starvation if the available eggs are depleted by other larvae. Multiple adults of M. viridis were able to develop in single egg sacs of Pisaurina mira (Walckenaer), Latrodectus mactans (Fabri- cius), and an unidentified large araneid, possibly because the spiders are relatively large and pro- duce large egg sacs. Mortality caused by conspe- cifics also may play a role in multiply-infested sacs. Richardson (1976) noted that it was not uncommon for second and third instars of M. viridis to kill other larvae when reared together in the laboratory. Unfortunately, many of the larvae in multiply-infested sacs in the present study were already dead and somewhat dessi- cated when the sacs were first examined, making a conclusive determination of the cause of their fate impossible. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Kurt E. Redborg, Coe College; Stev- en Roble, Carnegie Museum of Natural History; and Mitchell E. Roof and B. Merle Shepard, both of Clemson University, for their helpful com- ments on earlier drafts. This is Technical Con- tribution No. 3117 of the South Carolina Agri- cultural Experiment Station, Clemson University. LITERATURE CITED Brauer, F. 1869. Beschreibung der Verwandlungs- geschichte der Mantispa styriaca Poda und Betrach- tungen iiber die sogenannte Hypermetamorphose Fabre’s. Verb. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien, 19:831-840. Bristowe, C. S. 1932. Mantispa, a spider parasite. Entomol. Mon. Mag., 68:222-224. Brushwein, J. R. & J. D. Culin. 1991. Modified rear- ing and maintenance techniques for Mantispa viridis (Neuroptera: Mantispidae). Florida Entomol., 74: 446-452. Dondale, C. D. & J. H. Redner. 1990. The insects and arachnids of Canada. Part 1 7. The wolf spiders. 156 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY nurseryweb spiders, and lynx spiders of Canada and Alaska. Araneae: Lycosidae, Pisauridae, and Oxy- opidae. Agric. Canada Publ. 1856. 383 pp. Downes, M. F. 1985. Emergence of /I imbecilla (Gerstaecker) (Neuroptera: Mantispidae) from the retreat web of Mopsus pencillatus (Karsch) (Araneae: Salticidae). Australian Entomol. Mag., 12: 54. Fink, L. S. 1986. Costs and benefits of maternal be- haviour in the green lynx spider (Oxyopidae, Peu- cetia viridans). Anim. Behav., 34:1051-1060. Fink, L. S. 1987. Green lynx spider egg sacs: sources of mortality and the function of female guarding (Araneae, Oxyopidae). J. ArachnoL, 15:231-239. Hieber, C. S. 1984. Egg predators of the cocoons of the spider Mecynogea lemniscata (Araneae: Ara- neidae): rearing and population data. Florida En- tomol., 67:176-178. Hoffman, K. M. & J. R. Brushwein. 1992. Descrip- tions of the larvae and pupae of some North Amer- ican Mantispinae (Neuroptera: Mantispidae) and development of a system of larval chaetotaxy for Neuroptera. Trans. American Entomol. Soc., 118: 159-196. Kaston, B. J. 1948. Spiders of Connecticut. Con- necticut St. Geol. Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 70. 874 pp. Kaston, B. J. 1978. How to Know the Spiders, 3rd ed. Brown Publ. Co., Dubuque, Iowa. 272 pp. Kishida, K. 1929. On the oviposition of a clubionid spider, Chiracanthium rubicundulum. Lansania, Tokyo, 1:73-74. (in Japanese). McKeown, K. C. & V. H. Mincham. 1948. The bi- ology of an Australian mantispid (Mantispa vittata Guerin). Australian Zook, 1 1:207-224. Milliron, H. E. 1 940. The emergence of a neotropical mantispid from a spider egg sac. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America, 33:357-360. Monserrat, V. J. & L. M. Diaz-Aranda. 1989. Esta- dios larvarios de los neuropteros ibericos. V: Man- tispa styriaca (Poda, 1761) (Planipennia: Mantis- pidae). Neuroptera Int., 5:189-204. Parfin, S. 1958. Notes on the bionomics of the Man- tispidae (Neuroptera: Planipennia). Entomol. News, 69:203-207. Platnick, N. I. 1989. Advances in Spider Taxonomy 1981-1987. Manchester Univ. Press, Manchester, England. 673 pp. Redborg, K. E. & E. G. MacLeod. 1985. The devel- opmental ecology of Mantispa uhleri Banks (Neu- roptera: Mantispidae). Illinois Biol. Monogr. 53. 130 pp. Richardson, M. W. 1976. Micropredators of spiders. Ph.D. dissertation. Southern Illinois Univ., Car- bondale, Illinois. 211 pp. Roble, S. M. 1986. A new spider host association for Mantispa viridis (Neuroptera, Mantispidae). J. Ar- achnoL, 14:135-136. Roth, V. D. 1985. Spider Genera of North America. American ArachnoL Soc. 176 pp. Stein, R. J. 1955. An insect masquerader. Nat. Hist., 11:472^73. Tolbert, W. W. 1976. Population dynamics of the orb weaving spiders Argiope trifasciata and Argiope aiirantia (Araneae, Araneidae): density changes as- sociated with mortality, natality and migrations. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee. 186 pp. Valerio, C. E. 1971. Parasitismo en huevos de arana Achaearanea tepidariorum (Koch) (Aranea: Theri- diidae) en Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop., 18:99-106. Manuscript received 27 May 1992, revised 31 August 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:157-164 LIFE CYCLE AND HABITAT PREFERENCE OF THE FACULTATIVELY ARBOREAL WOLF SPIDER, GLADICOSA PULCHRA (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) Micky D. Eubanks* and Gary L. Miller: Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677 USA ABSTRACT. The life history and habitat preference of the wolf spider Gladicosa pulchm were investigated in several populations in Mississippi. Gladicosa pulchra has a one year life cycle with spiders changing from forest floor to tree trunk habitats in late summer or early fall. During the fall, spiders were found almost exclusively on trees (93% of observed spiders in 1989 and 80% of observed spiders in 1990). Males were observed to inhabit trees earlier in the year than females. Spiders did not climb trees smaller than 2 cm in diameter at breast height. Most individuals were collected at heights less than 2.5 m, and spiders were primarily oriented face down while on trees. The role that environmental factors play in this animal’s habitat preference is discussed. Although the wolf spiders (Lycosidae) are pri- marily ground dwellers, some species are occa- sionally found on low vegetation (e.g., Lycosa caro/mewsw Walckenaer, L. timuqua Wallace, and L. rabida Walckenaer, Kuenzler 1958; Bames 1953, L. hentzi Banks, Miller et al. 1988), small low tree branches (e.g., L. rabida, Kuenzler 1958), and, less often, the trunks of trees (e.g., L. ha- waiiensis Simon, Gon 1985). One species for which the use of arboreal habitats appears to be a more significant aspect of its life history is Gladicosa pulchra (Keyserling). Brady (1986) re- ported that mature males and females of this species were commonly collected from the tranks of trees but rarely from the forest floor. Miller and Miller (pers. obs.) have found the extensive use of tree trunk habitats during certain times of the year predominately by penultimate and ma- ture individuals in both pine and hardwood hab- itats in Florida and Mississippi. These obser- vations, particularly the dearth of sightings of individuals in habitats other than trees, imply that G. pulchra spiders may undergo an abrupt habitat change, moving from forest floor to trees. However, no detailed ecological study of this species has been undertaken, and the phenology and significance of the use of arboreal habitats are unclear. In particular, it is not known whether tree trank habitats serve primarily as sites for ‘Current address: Department of Entomology, 1300 Symons Hall, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742-5575. foraging, reproduction, or as a refuge from pred- ators. The purpose of this study was to delineate the life cycle of G. pulchra for the purpose of un- derstanding the importance of the use of the ar- boreal habitat in this species. In particular, we describe (1) the life history, (2) the timing of tree climbing behavior, (3) tree size preference, (4) height of spiders on trees, (5) the orientation of spiders on trees, and (6) sex differences in ar- boreal habitat use. METHODS Habitat Preferences and Life History. — We conducted the study in a 3 ha mixed-hardwood woodlot located on the University of Mississippi campus, near Oxford (Lafayette County), Mis- sissippi. The study site was composed predom- inantly of a canopy and understory of Quercus spp. with abundant leaf litter (> 15 cm depth in some locations). We made weekly nighttime sur- veys of the area between 30 March-19 Novem- ber 1989, and between 1 February- 15 October 1990. Periodic observations were made during February, June, and July of 1991, but no mea- surements were made. For every individual G. pulchra observed on a tree we determined: (1) the diameter [cm] at breast height [DBH] of the tree, (2) the height [cm] of the spider on the tree, (3) the vertical orientation of the spider mea- sured as degrees to the nearest 1 0° with face down orientation designated as 0°, and (4) the number of additional G. pulchra spiders on the tree. All spiders that were collected in 1989 and 1990 157 158 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY were taken to the laboratory where immatures were reared to adulthood to assess sex and de- velopmental stage at capture; however, not all spiders that were observed were collected. To determine the size distribution of trees in the woodlot we measured the DBH of every tree within 2 m of three north-south transects (each 200 m in length). The transect samples repre- sented approximately 4% of the area of the wood- lot. Weekly average temperatures and rainfall ac- cumulations were obtained from the USDA National Sedimentation Laboratory weather sta- tion located approximately five km from the field site in Oxford, Mississippi. In addition to the detailed observations made at the primary study site, we made periodic ob- servations (approximately once each month) at four other areas of Lafayette County, Mississip- pi. We propose a life history of this species based on all of our observations in all study areas. Statistical Analyses.— To determine whether individual G. piilchra select trees of a specific size, we compared the size (DBH) distribution of trees climbed by spiders to that of trees sam- pled along the transects with a Kolmogorov- Smimov (KS) goodness-of-fit test (test statistic designated d„3,,; Sokal & Rohlf 1 980). Regression analysis was employed to determine if there was a seasonal trend in the DBH of trees selected by spiders. A two-tailed Durbin-Watson test was used to determine whether the error terms of the regression were uncorrelated (Neter et al. 1991). The two-tailed test is performed by testing sep- arately for positive and negative autocorrelation where the Type I error for the combined test is 2a (Neter et al. 1991). We tested whether the orientation of males and females was uniformly distributed around a cir- cle using the Rayleigh test (test statistic denoted Z; Zar 1984). The mean direction, the 95% con- fidence interval of the mean, the Z statistic, and, r, a unitless measure of magnitude or concentra- tion that ranges from 0 (indicating so much dis- persion that a mean direction cannot be de- scribed) to 1 .0 (where all the data are concentrated at the same direction) are presented (Zar 1984). Contingency table analysis (G-statistic, Sokal & Rohlf 1980) was used to compare the fre- quency with which adult male and female, pen- ultimate male and female, and immatures were present on trees during each year. We employed logistic regression analysis (Hosmer & Leme- show 1989) to determine if the sex of a spider ADULT MALES AND FEMALES Courtship and Copulation IMMATURE SPIDERS Mature (Forest Floor/Trees) ADULT FEMALES Overwinter (Forest Floor/Burrows) SPIDERLINGS Emerge From Egg Case (Forest Floor) ADULT FEMALES With Egg Case (Forest Floor/Burrows) Figure 1. — Proposed life history of Gladicosa pul- chra. Adults are present on trees in the fall of the year where courtship and copulation is thought to occur. Females overwinter gravid and produce egg cases in the spring while inhabiting burrows. Females move about on the forest floor with spiderlings on their ab- domen in late spring. Spiders then climb trees as they approach maturity during the late summer and early fall. was related to the date collected, height of the spider at the time of collection, or the DBH of the tree on which the spider was observed. Lo- gistic regression analysis is used to test for re- lationships between a discrete (usually dichoto- mous) dependent variable and discrete or continuous independent (predictor) variables. In our analysis the presence or absence of females represented the dichotomous dependent variable and the variables DBH, height of collection site, and date of collection or observation represented the predictor variables. A hierarchy of models including all subsets of the independent variables was examined. The likelihood ratio (denoted D), which is analogous to the residual sum of squares in linear regression, is reported and the test sta- tistic G was employed to determine what vari- ables were significant predictors of the response variable (Hosmer & Lemeshow 1989). Logistic analysis was calculated on the BMDP statistical package. Student’s t test was used to determine if the average DBH of trees occupied by more than one spider was larger than the average DBH of trees occupied by a single spider. To determine if there were seasonal differences in the number of trees occupied by more than one spider, we used lo- gistic regression as described above with the number of spiders per tree as the dependent vari- able. Because of the small number of sampling dates during 1 99 1 , we did not attempt to analyze seasonal trends for that year. EUBANKS & mUJEK-GLADICOSA PULCHRA LIFE HISTORY 159 Table 1.— Summary of collections of G. pulchra for 1989 and 1990. The (*) indicates that males and fe- males were not reared to adulthood to access sex, and the (**) indicates that immatures were not included in the totals. On trees On forest floor Fe- Males males Males Fe- males 1989-(30 Mar. -19 Nov.) {n = 91) Immature 0 4 0 0 Penultimate 18 14 0 1 Adult 6 43 1 4 Total 24 61 1 5 1990-(1 Feb.- 15 Oct.) (n = 153) Immature 56* — 18* — Penultimate 16 13 5 0 Adult 18 20 3 4 Total 34** 33 8»* 4 RESULTS Life History. — A proposed life history of G. pulchra is diagrammed in Fig. 1. During 1989 and 1 990, adult males and females were collected predominantly on trees in the fall. Courtship and copulation were not observed during either year, however, during February of 1991 we collected two gravid females. These females were found in vertical burrows approximately 10 cm deep each with a turret constructed of leaf litter. Dur- ing this same month, three mature females and one immature spider were collected from the for- est floor and a mature female was taken from a tree at another site located on the University of Mississippi, Oxford campus. Patricia Miller (pers. comm.) observed a mature female with an egg sac occupying a burrow located in her yard 1.2 km north of Oxford, Mississippi. This burrow had a turret constructed from grass. During both census ye -is, no adult males were collected dur- ing the spring. Habitat Preferences.— Of the 91 spiders col- lected during 1989 headlight censuses, 6 (7%) were found on the forest floor (Table 1). Only one, an adult female, was collected prior to 21 August, the first date that spiders were collected from trees (Table 1). The first date that spiders were collected from trees coincided with the first week of the year during which the average weekly temperature reached 29 °C or higher in both 1989 and 1990 (21 August 1991 and 2 June 1991, respectively). Proportion o< Trees y- Proportion ot Trees 0.6 - jHlM litBmBi H -- - - 0 10 20 30 40 60 60 70 80 Proportion of Trees DBH (cm) Figure 2. — Top, Frequency of occurrence of trees in sixteen, 5 cm size classes (Diameter in cm at Breast Height) for trees selected along transects; Middle, trees climbed by spiders in 1989; and Bottom, trees climbed by spiders in 1990. The average DBH of trees selected along the transects was 8 cm (« = 196, SD = 19; Fig. 2), and that distribution of tree sizes also differed significantly from the distribution of trees se- 160 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Height of Spiders on Trees 1989 & 1990 Number Height (cm) Figure 3.— The number of Gladicosa pulchm collected at each height (cm) on trees during 1989 and 1990 at the study site on The University of Mississippi campus, Oxford, Mississippi. lected along the transects (KS test, = 0.64, n, = 90, = 196, P < 0.01). The two-tailed Durbin-Watson test for auto- correlation revealed no positive or negative cor- relation among error terms in the regressions of DBH against collection date for either 1989 or 1 990 (test for positive correlation, 0,98, = 1 .663, n = 180, D,99o = 1.814, n = 108, P < O.OI; test for negative correlation, D,989 = 6.656, n = 180, D,99o = 2.186, « = 108, P < 0.01). There was no seasonal change in tree size preference during 1989 or 1990 (Regression analysis, = 0.02, MSE = 518.89, df= 139, P > 0.05; = 0.02, MSE = 360.32, df = 89, P > 0.10, 1989 and 1990 respectively). In 1989, 93% of the 91 spiders collected were found on trees (Table 1). Adult females were found significantly more often on trees than any other sex/stage combination in 1989 (contingen- cy table analysis, Gadj = 17.79, n = 85, P < 0.001). During the 1990 census, 80% of the 153 spiders collected were found on trees. In 1990 no sex/stage combination was present signifi- cantly more often than any other (contingency table analysis, G^dj = 0.37, n = 61, P > 0.5). Immature spiders were first collected from trees on 2 June 1990, and 85% of the 13 spiders col- lected on that date were on trees. Adult spiders were not collected on trees until late August, as in 1989. The height of spiders on trees averaged 145 cm in 1989 and 80 cm in 1990. No seasonal changes in height were observed during either year (Regression analysis, R^ = 0.02, MSE = 3979.55, df= 89, P > 0.05; R^ = 0.04, MSE = 5549.43, #= 107, P > 0.05, 1989 and 1990 respectively). During both years most spiders were at heights below 2.5 m (Fig. 3). During both years the vertical orientation of spiders differed significantly from random, with most individuals adopting a face down position on the tree (mean direction = 0°, n = 101, 95% EUBANKS & MILLER- GLAD/COSA PULCHRA LIFE HISTORY 161 1989 1990 Figure 4.— Orientation of Gladicosa pulchra collected from trees in 1989 and 1990. Figures shov/ the mean direction (P), magnitude (r), and number of obser'/ations {N), 0° = facing down. Each darkened circle represents two observations. Cl ±10, r = .82, Z = 67.91, P < 0.001; mean direction = 0°, « = 57, 95% Cl ±10, r = 0.91, Z = 47.20, P < 0.001; 1989, 1990 respectively; Fig. 4). Males, females, and immatures all had mean directions = 0°. The proportion of spiders collected or ob- served during 1989 that were female was 0.73, significantly different from a 1 : 1 maie/female sex ratio (x^ P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis results showed that date was the best predictor of the sex of an individual spider (D = - 56.246, G = 8.81, 0.005 < P > 0.001). Female spiders were more likely to be found on trees later in the season than males. In 1990, the overall propor- tion of females in the population was 0.47 and did not differ significantly from a 1:1 male/fe- male sex ratio (x^ P > 0.05). In 1990, date was the best predictor of the sex of an individual spider collected from a tree (D = —20.554, G = 9.2, 0.005 < P > 0.001), and as in 1989, females were more likely to be found later in the season than males. During both years few spiders were observed to occupy trees that contained other G. pulchra (16 out of 238 observations, 7%). During 1989 trees occupied by a single spider had a signifi- cantly smaller mean DBH than those with two or more spiders (t = -4.53, P < 0.001), but not in 1 990 (t = 0. 1 , F > 0.05). The number of trees occupied by more than one spider at one time significantly increased during the season in 1 989 (D = -26.451, G = 12.881, df= 6, P < 0.05), 162 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY but this was not the case during 1990 (D = -22.040, G = 10.013, df= 1,P> 0.1). DISCUSSION Although we collected immature individuals during February of 1991, we believe that the observations reported here support the sugges- tion of a one-year life cycle for G. pulchra, with courtship and copulation occurring in the fall (Fig. 1). Although the location of courtship and copulation is uncertain, the abundance of pen- ultimate and mature spiders found on trees in the fall of 1989 and 1990 suggests the possible importance of the arboreal habitat in the repro- duction of this species. Females apparently over- winter gravid and produce egg sacs in burrows during the spring. It is unclear whether females construct burrows or whether they usurp com- pleted or partially completed burrows of another species. It is evident, however, females expend some energy in the construction and mainte- nance of the turret. Spiderlings emerge from egg sacs in the spring and reach sexual maturity during the early fall. Once the spiderlings emerge, the female aban- dons the burrow and wanders about the forest floor carrying the young on her abdomen in the manner typical of non-burrowing wolf spiders. Adult males apparently do not overwinter, and are present predominantly on trees during the fall. Our observations showed that in 1989 and 1990 G. pulchra is present primarily on trees during the late summer and early fall. Spiders were rare- ly collected from the forest floor or from trees prior to the fall, but females were found in bur- rows during the spring. These observations sug- gest that individuals move from the forest floor (either from burrows or from the leaf litter) to trees during the late summer or early fall. Pre- vious studies of spiders have documented vari- ations in microhabitat use by different sizes or different life stages of conspecifics (e.g., Waldorf 1976; Hallander 1970). Hallander (1970) re- ported that spiders of the genus Pardosa stratified their use of leaf litter habitats according to body size in order to limit the effects of cannibalism. However, the change from the forest floor habitat to a tree dwelling life style observed in G. pulchra is substantially more dramatic than most habitat shifts observed in spiders. Animals may change habitats to balance the conflicting demands of minimizing the risk of mortality and maximizing food intake (e.g., Werner & Gilliam 1984, Wer- ner et al. 1983, Gilliam & Fraser 1987, Werner & Hall 1988, Pierce 1988, Gotceitas & Colgan 1990, Gotceitas 1990) or to avoid intraspecific competition or size-specific predation (Werner & Gilliam 1 984). The relative importance of these two factors in the habitat change of G. pulchra will be reported elsewhere. In both 1 989 and 1 990 adult females and pen- ultimate males were occasionally observed to oc- cupy positions on the same tree. The asynchrony in the timing of maturation of males and females that is indicated by these observations is not un- common in spiders (e.g., Austin 1984; Berry 1987; Miller & Miller 1987). Such differences in the timing of maturation may lead to pre-courtship cohabitation (e.g., Robinson & Robinson 1980; Christenson & Goist 1979; Pollard & Jackson 1982; Jackson 1977; Miller & Miller 1986). Typ- ically, if cohabitation occurs, the mature male seeks a stationary subadult female and waits with her until she matures. However, our observa- tions indicate that penultimate males ascend trees earlier in the year than females, which typically climb as adults. Thus, if the proximity of males and females on trees represents pre-courtship co- habitation in this species, then both the behav- iors associated with the phenomenon (e.g., one sex moving to locate another) and the relative timing of the maturation of the sexes are different from that observed in other spiders. It is im- portant to note that the proximity of males and females of different stages on the same tree may be the result of other processes (e.g., foraging, predator avoidance) not related directly to re- productive behavior. Moreover, the majority of our observations were of single individuals on a tree (see below). Our observations indicate that the onset of tree climbing in G. pulchra is not exclusively triggered developmentally. The sex ratio of collected spi- ders was strongly female biased in 1989, but not in 1990. Additionally, the beginning of the tree dwelling phase came later in the year in 1989 than in 1990. In 1990, spiders climbed trees ear- lier in the year (June vs. August) and earlier in their life cycle (immature vs. penultimate or adult). Thus, spiders climbed trees at different stages in the two years. Although, considerably more work will be required to determine the rel- ative influence of physical and biological factors in this behavior, our study suggests the impor- EUBANKS & M.IUJEB.-GLADICOSA PULCH114 LIFE HISTORY 163 tance of rainfall as a critical physical parameter. Total rainfall was greater in the summer of 1989 than in the summer of 1990. Humidity and soil moisture should be directly influenced by rain- fall, and these two factors have been shown to play an important role in the microhabitat se- lection of spiders (Cady 1984; Reichert & Tracy 1975). Individual G. pulchra were never collected on trees smaller than 2 cm DBH during this study. Larger trees may provide larger foraging areas or refuge from forest floor predators. We have no information about the relative availability of prey on trees and the forest floor, but spiders were often observed feeding on ants and moths on trees. However, a potential predator of G. pul- chra, the large wolf spider Lycosa georgicola Walckenaer, is common on the forest floor. We have seen individuals of that species climb small saplings but we made only a single observation of L. georgicola on a tree larger than 2 cm DBH. The average height of spiders on trees did not change as the season progressed in 1 989 or 1 990. Spiders were predominantly found at heights be- tween 1.5-2. 5 m, and individuals of all stages (immatures, penultimates, and adults) typically adopted a face down orientation while on the tree. In the absence of a compelling physiological explanation for the face-down behavior, we sug- gest that such an orientation is the most practical for intercepting prey and/or mates that originate from below. The relatively constant height through the season supports this notion. Although we observed trees that held more than one spider, most of the spiders seen during this study were the lone occupant of the tree from which they were collected. Many field studies have established that density-dependent effects, such as competition for web sites, occur in web- building spiders (Schaefer 1978; Reichert 1979; Wise 1981). Web-building spiders tend to stratify web construction in a manner that reduces com- petition. Our observations may indicate an anal- ogous form of habitat stratification or territori- ality. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank Patricia R. Miller, Gail Stratton, Timothy G. Forrest, Joel Trexler, Kari Benson, and Chester Figiel for their constructive comments on various versions of this paper. Noel Hunt assisted with the field work. This research was supported by a grant from the Exline-Frizzell Fund for Arachnological Research, California Academy of Sciences. LITERATURE CITED Austin, A. D. 1984. Life history of Clubiona robusta L. Koch and related species (Araneae, Clubionidae) in South Australia. J. ArachnoL, 12:87-104. Barnes, R. D. 1953. The ecological distribution of spiders in non-forest maritime communities at Beaufort, North Carolina. Ecol. Mon., 23:316-337. Berry, J. W. 1987. Notes on the life history and be- havior of the communal spider Cyrtophora mol- uccensis (Doleschall) (Araneae, Araneidae) in Yap, Caroline Islands. J. Arachnol., 15:309-319. Brady, A. R. 1986. Nearctic species of the new wolf spider genus Gladicosa (Araneae: Lycosidae). Psy- che, 93:285-319. Cady, A. B. 1984. Microhabitat selection and loco- motor activity of Schizocosa ocreata (Walckenaer) (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol., 1 1:297-307. Christenson, T. E. & K. C. Goist. 1979. Costs and benefits of male-male competition in the orb weav- ing spider, Nephila clavipes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 5:87-92. Gilliam, J. F. & D. F. Fraser. 1987. Habitat selection under predation hazard: test of a model with for- aging minnows. Ecology, 68:1856-1862. Gon, S. M. 1985. A Hawaiian wolf spider, Lycosa hawaiiensis Simon foraging in the top of a Metros- ideros polymorpha tree. J. Arachnol., 13:393. Gotceitas, V. 1990. Foraging and predator avoid- ance: a test of a patch choice model with juvenile bluegill sunfish. Oecologia (Berlin), 83:346-351. Gotceitas, V. & P. Colgan. 1990. The effects of prey availability and predation risk on habitat selection by juvenile bluegill sunfish. Copeia, 1990:409-417. Hallander, H. 1970. Prey, cannibalism and micro- habitat selection in the wolf spiders Pardosa chelata O.F. Muller and P. pullata Clerck. Oikos, 21:337- 340. Hosmer, D. W. & S. Lemeshow. 1989. Applied Lo- gistic Regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York. Jackson, R. R. 1977. Courtship versatility in the jumping spider, Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae: Sal- ticidae). Anim. Behav., 25:953-957. Kuenzler, E. J. 1958. Niche relations of three species of lycosid spiders. Ecology, 39:494-500. Miller, G. L. & P. R. Miller. 1986. Pre-courtship cohabitation of mature male and penultimate fe- male Geolycosa turricola (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol., 14:133-134. Miller, G. L., P. R. Miller & A. R. Brady. 1988. Ad- hesive hairs in lycosid spiders of various life styles, including the occurrence of claw tufts in Lycosa hen- tzi Banks. Bull. British. Arachnol. Soc., 7:213-216. Neter, J., W. Wasserman, M. H. Kutner. 1991. Ap- 164 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY plied linear statistical models, 3rd edition. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois. Pierce, C. L. 1988. Predator avoidance, microhabitat shift, and risk-sensitive foraging in larval dragon- flies. Oecologia (Berlin), 77:81-90. Pollard, S. D. & R. R. Jackson. 1982. The biology of Clubiona cambridgei (Araneae, Clubionidae): In- traspecific interactions. New Zealand J. Ecol., 5:44- 50. Reichert. S. E. 1979. Games spiders play. III. Re- source assessment strategies. Behav. Ecol. Socio- biol., 6:121-128. Reichert, S. E. & C. R. Tracy. 1975. Thermal balance and prey availability: Basis for a model relating web- site characteristics to spider reproductive success. Ecology, 56:265-284. Robinson, M. H. & B. Robinson. 1980. Comparative studies of the courtship and mating behavior of tropical araneid spiders. Pacific Insects Monogr. No. 36. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Schaefer, M. 1978. Some experiments on the regu- lation of population density in the spider Floronia biicculenta (Araneida: Linyphiidae). Symp. Zool. Soc. London, 42:203-210. Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf 1980. Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York. Waldorf, E. S. 1976. Spider size, microhabitat selec- tion, and use of food. American Mid. Nat., 96:76- 87. Werner, E. E. & D. J. Hall. 1988. Ontogenetic habitat shifts in bluegill: the foraging rate-predation risk trade-off. Ecology, 69:1352-1366. Werner, E. E. & J. F. Gilliam. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 15:393-425. Werner, E. E., J. F. Gilliam, D. J. Hall & G. G. Mit- telbach. 1983. An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology, 64: 1540-1548. Wise, D. H. 1981. Inter- and intraspecific effects of density manipulations upon females of two orb- weaving spiders (Araneae: Araneidae). Oecologia (Berlin), 48:252-256. Zar, J. H. 1 984. Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Manuscript received 22 September 1 991, revised 20 June 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:165-172 ABUNDANCE AND ASSOCIATION OF CURSORIAL SPIDERS FROM CALCAREOUS FENS IN SOUTHERN MISSOURI Thomas L. Bultman: Division of Science, Northeast Missouri State University, Kirksville, Missouri 63501 USA ABSTRACT. I systematically sampled, by pitfall trap, spiders in three different but nearly contiguous fens (Seep, Prairie and Forested) as well as those in the surrounding habitat (Oak-hickory forest) in southern Missouri. Samples were taken biweekly from May through August. Fifty-five species of cursorial spiders were found, of these, 17 occurred only within one or more of the fens and not in the surrounding habitat. All habitats, and particularly fens, were dominated by wolf spiders. Jaccard’s similarity coefficient showed spider faunas of the Seep and Prairie fens were more similar to one another than to that of the Forested fen. While both Seep and Forested fen habitats harbored spider species quite different from the surrounding Oak-hickory forest, many species from the Forested fen were also found in the Oak-hickory habitat (56.3%). Abundances of spiders were greatest in May and declined through summer in all habitats, except the Seep fen in which abundances remained fairly constant. Tests of interspecific association among species within Lycosidae, Clubionidae, and Gnaphosidae gave no evidence of negative associations of species, which could theoretically result from interspecific com- petition, among the three fen habitats. I conclude that the spider faunas associated with the fens are quite distinct from that of the surrounding habitat with each fen harboring a somewhat unique assemblage of spiders and that there is no evidence of competitive exclusion of species The Ozark Mountains are a biologically rich area of the central United States with many en- demic plant (Thom & Wilson 1980; Thom & Iffrig 1985) and animal species. Of the com- munities found there, fens are perhaps the most distinctive. Fens are boggy areas with saturated soils caused by seepage. Within the Ozark Moun- tains, fens are most common in the Salem Pla- teau region (Thom & Wilson 1980). Several un- usual geological factors contribute to the abundance of fens in the Salem Plateau region. First, the region is characterized by Cambrio- Ordovician dolomite bedrock covered by a thick residuum formed from in situ weathering of the parent material. The residuum freely accepts and transmits water (Orzell 1983). Second, there are several regional springs that are recharged in the area. As water moves through the residuum from hillsides and uplands the soil becomes saturated. In lowland areas within the Salem Plateau region fens develop under the influence of a constant supply of cool water. The source of the water is thought to be springs recharged by storage groundwater (Aley 1978). Fed by cool-water springs, fens of Missouri support a flora more typical of latitudes much farther north. Recent work shows that the flora of Missouri fens is markedly different from that of the sur- from the fen habitats. rounding vegetation (Orzell 1983). Yet, the ar- thropod fauna associated with fens is poorly known. Systematic sampling of fen spiders has not been done. The goal of my study was to describe the spiders associated with the various fen types in the Grasshopper Hollow Fen com- plex in southern Missouri. Additional objectives were to assess the seasonal abundance patterns of spiders, to assess if species exclude one another from some fens and to evaluate how unique fen spiders are, compared to those from the habitat surrounding the fens. A goal of my work is to provide knowledge about the biotic distinctness of the fens so that appropriate management prac- tices of these protected and unique habitats can be initiated. METHODS The study was conducted in the largest (7 hec- tares) and most diverse fen complex in Missouri: Grasshopper Hollow Fen in Reynolds County. The complex is heterogeneous, being composed of several fens that differ somewhat vegetatively (Orzell 1983). One of the fens in the complex, the Seep fen, is heavily dominated by various species of sedges [Carex interior Bailey, C. lep- talea Wahl, and C. subserecta (Olney) Britt.] and rush (Juncus dudleyi Wieg.). Another fen type, 165 166 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY the Prairie fen, contains an interesting mix of fen (cord grass, Spartina pectinata Link.) and prairie plants (big bluestem, Andwpogon gerardii Vitm.; Indian grass, Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash; prairie dock; Silphium terebinthinaceum Jacq.; and swamp orange coneflower, Rudbeckia ful- gida Ait.). A third fen type, the Forested fen, contains the following calcifile tree species: Quer- cus mulenbergii Engelm., Q. rubra L., Fraxinus americana L., Alnus serrulata (Ait.) Willd., and Carpinus caroliniana Walt. The habitat sur- rounding the fen complex is mesic oak-hickory forest typical of southern Missouri (Nelson 1985). I assessed vegetative structure at the study sites monthly. Foliage height diversity (FHD) was de- termined by the point-quadrat method using a calibrated (four 0.4 m intervals) pole that was diagonally placed at 1 m intervals along a ran- domly selected 8 m transect within each habitat. The number of stems contacting the pole at each height interval was recorded. Data generated from samples were input into the Shannon (1948) di- versity index to give the foliage height diversity, as has been done by others (e. g., Willson 1974). The technique provides a measure of the struc- tural diversity of the habitat, a feature than may strongly influence arthopods (Murdock et al. 1972). Ten pitfall traps (13 cm diameter; 9 cm deep) were placed in 1989 within each fen and the surrounding habitat to sample cursorial spiders. Traps were placed at 5 m intervals along a ran- domly-placed 50 m transect, with the exception of the Forested fen which was less than 50 m in diameter. Here, traps were placed randomly within the habitat. Traps were placed in fens during the first and third week of each sampling month; sampling occurred on two weeks each month to reduce environmental pertebation to the protected study area. A mixture of ethylene glycol and water (1:1) was used as a preservative in traps. Spiders were sampled in May, June, July and August. Wooden covers raised above traps by legs allowed arthropod entry but discouraged mammals from entering and falling into traps. Pitfall traps do not give a true measure of density, rather they sample the number of cursorial spi- ders moving in an area for a given time or the “active density” (Uetz 1977). Yet, they are useful in that they allow continuous sampling in varied habitats and provide an adequate estimate of the number of species of cursorial spiders over a wide range of habitats (Uetz & Unziker 1976). Several pitfall traps were disturbed during the study and could not be included in the analysis. Therefore, for some months, some habitats had fewer than 10 pitfall trap samples. Numbers of individuals from these pitfall traps were stan- dardized to make them comparable to habitats that did not have disturbed traps. For example, two pitfall traps in May from the Prairie fen were disturbed. Numbers of spiders collected in the remaining eight traps were multiplied by 10/8. In June, all 10 traps in the Prairie fen were dis- turbed, apparently by a small vertebrate. Fen and non-fen habitats were compared at the species level using Jaccard’s (1908) coeffi- cient, Sj = a/a + b + c where a is the number of species collected in both habitats A and B, b is the number of species collected in habitat B but not in habitat A, and C is the number of species collected in habitat A but not in habitat B. Species identification was made by the author, except for several species of Lycosidae and Gna- phosidae, which were identified or their identity verified by systematists. Only adult specimens (with the exception of a few individuals whose color pattern and general morphology allowed unquestionable matching with mature individ- uals) are included in the data set since immatures could rarely be reliably identified to species. I calculated the variance ratio (VR) to test si- multaneously for significant associations among species present at the three fen habitats for mem- bers of the Lycosidae, Clubionidae, and Gna- phosidae. The variance ratio was calculated as VR = Syar where S? is the variance in total species number and (T? is the total sample variance for occur- rences of the S species in the samples from the three fens (see Schluter 1984). If VR > 1, then the species exhibit a positive association and if VR < 1 , a negative association exists among the species at the fens. The statistic, W, was com- puted to test whether deviations of VR from 1.0 were significant. The statistic, W, equals N(VR), where N is the number of habitats; W has a 95% probability of falling between limits given by the chi-square distribution (see Schluter 1984) X^.025,N ^ ^ X .975,N- BULTMAN-CURSORIAL SPIDERS FROM MISSOURI FENS 167 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A total of 55 species of cursorial spiders was collected from the fen and non-fen habitats (Ta- ble 1). These spiders represented eight families. Of these species, 17 were found only in one or more of the fens and not in the Oak-hickory forest. Only one species was restricted to just the Oak-hickory forest. Both Seep and Prairie fens contained fairly diverse wolf (8 and 1 1 species, respectively) and running (7 and 1 2 species, re- spectively) spider groups. Overall, the Prairie fen was the most speciose of the habitats sampled, while the Forested fen had the fewest number of species (Table 1). Comparison of species similarity among the various habitats reveals several interesting fea- tures (Table 2). The coefficient of similarity be- tween the spider faunas at the Seep and Prairie fens is quite high (Sj = 0.457 1 ; Table 2), but both of these faunas are quite dissimilar to that found at the Forested fen. The Seep fen spider fauna is also not similar to that found in the Oak-hickory forest. The spider community associated with the surrounding habitat is truly much different than that found in the Seep fen. In contrast, the spider species associated with the Forested fen and the Oak-hickory forest are fairly similar (Sj = 0.2727; Table 2). Species associated with the Prairie fen show some similarities with those from the Oak- hickory forest (Sj = 0.2500; Table 2), but less so than species from the Forested fen. Overall, eight of the 55 species collected in the study were found only in pitfall traps placed in the Prairie fen. Moreover, since these data represent only three- trap months (due to disturbance in June), it is likely that one or more species endemic to the Prairie fen may have been missed. In sum, while the Prairie fen and particularly the Seep fen tend to harbor spider species unlike the surrounding non-fen habitat, the Forested fen contains spe- cies also found in the surrounding Oak-hickory forest. Looking at individual spider species reveals similarities and differences among habitats at the species level (Table 1). Pirata insularis Emerton was found at all sites, but was particularly com- mon in the three fen habitats. Seep and Prairie fens both shared a numerically abundant species, Pardosa saxatilis (Hentz) (Table 1). One species, Pirata insularis, a small wolf spider that is often found near water (Kaston 1981), comprised 64.4% of all individuals in the Seep fen. The Forested fen and the Oak-hickory forest shared nine species in common. Particularly abundant species that they both contained were: Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz), Drassylus novus (Banks), Gnaphosa sericata (L. Koch) and Xys- ticus fraternus Banks. The overlap in species is not unexpected, given that both habitats are for- ests and therefore share many abiotic features. While the Forested fen was most similar to the Oak-hickory forest, it did share some species with the other fens. Most notable are Pirata insularis, a species common in all three fens, but rare in the non-fen habitat; P. arenicola Emerton, which was found only in the Forested and Prairie fens; and, Drassylus creolus Chamberlin & Gertsch, also a member of Prairie and Forested fens. Of interest is Phrurotimpus borealis (Emerton), a species common to Oak-hickory and Forested fens, but more common in the latter. The range of this species is reported to be east of the Mis- sissippi River and north of Georgia (Kaston 1978). Its occurrence in southern Missouri is somewhat unexpected, since it is frequently found in more northern deciduous forests. Its presence in and near the Forested fen supports the hy- pothesis that the fens are refugia for species nor- mally found at more northern latitudes. In terms of community structure, the most dis- tinctive spider assemblage occurred at the Seep fen. This community was characterized by a rather sparse spider fauna (20 species; Table 1) and an extreme numerical dominant in Pirata insularis (64.4% of all individuals). The structure of the spider community at the Seep fen parallels the relatively simple structural diversity (Fig. 1 ) of the fen’s sedge-dominated vegetation. At the family level, lycosids dominated all habitats, particularly fens (Fig. 2). Of all habitats, the Seep fen was most heavily dominated by lycosids, with 95.7% of all individuals belonging to the Lycosidae (Fig. 2). In contrast, the cur- sorial spider faunas associated with the Prairie fen. Forested fen and Oak-hickory forest were composed of 83.3%, 64.8%, and 58.4% lycosids, respectively (Fig. 2). A preponderance of wolf spiders in the samples probably reflects the pitfall trap sampling technique employed. As a measure of “active density”, pitfall traps would be ex- pected to differentially capture highly active spi- ders like lycosids. However, visual inspection and hand sifting through litter also revealed that lycosids were by far the most common spiders present in the fen study sites (pers. obs.). While 168 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1.— Species list and seasonal abundances for cursorial spiders from pitfall trap samples taken in 1989. Abundances corrected for missing pitfall traps (see text). Habitat Family Seep Prairie Forested Oak-hickory Agelenidae Agelenopsis pennsylvanica (C. L. Koch) 0 2 3 0 Cicurina robusta Simon 2 0 0 0 Hahniidae Neoant istea magna (Keyserling) 1 9 0 2 Lycosidae Allocosa funerea (Hentz) 3 1 0 1 Arctosa virgo (Chamberlin) 0 0 0 29 Lycosa helluo Walckenaer 21 3 0 0 Lycosa rabida Walckenaer 8 24 0 0 Lycosa sp. A 0 0 8 17 Pardosa saxatilis (Hentz) 135 193 0 0 Pardosa moesta Banks 0 1 0 0 Pirata alachuus Gertsch & Wallace 18 5 14 15 Pimta insularis Emerton 391 28 87 2 Pirata arenicola Emerton 0 2 17 0 Schizocosa bilineata (Emerton) 2 29 0 1 Schizocosa crassipes (Walckenaer) 0 0 0 98 Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz) 3 11 77 51 Schizocosa saltatrix (Hentz) 0 8 0 2 Trabea aurantiaca (Emerton) 0 0 1 0 Gnaphosidae Callilepis imbecilla (Keyserling) 0 4 0 1 Drassylus aprilinus (Banks) 0 1 0 0 Drassylus covensis (Banks) 0 0 0 1 Drassylus creolus Chamberlin & Gertsch 1 5 3 0 Drassylus diximis Chamberlin 2 1 0 0 Drassylus eremitus Chamberlin 2 1 0 1 Drassylus niger (Banks) 0 5 0 0 Drassylus novus (Banks) 0 0 18 17 Gnaphosa fontinalis Keyserling 0 0 0 4 Gnaphosa sericata (L. Koch) 0 0 29 41 Haplodrassus bicornis (Emerton) 0 0 0 3 Haplodrassus signifer (C. L. Koch) 0 4 0 0 Herpyllus vasifer (Walckenaer) 0 0 0 1 Rachodrassus exlineae PI. & Sh. 0 0 0 2 Zelotes duplex Chamberlin 0 1 0 3 Z. hentzi Barrows 0 0 0 1 Clubionidae Castianeira descripta (Hentz) 1 1 0 0 Castianeira longipalpis (Hentz) 0 9 0 22 Castianeira variata Gertsch 6 0 0 0 Castianeira sp. A 4 0 0 0 Clubionoides excepta (C. L. Koch) 2 4 2 0 Micaria elizabethae Gertsch 0 2 0 0 Phrurotimpus alarms (Hentz) 0 0 19 7 Phrurotimpus borealis (Emerton) 0 0 11 4 BULTMAN-CURSORIAL SPIDERS FROM MISSOURI FENS 169 Table 1.— Continoed. Habitat Family Seep Prairie Forested Oak-hickory Thomisidae Misumenops sp. A 2 3 0 0 Oxyptiia sp. A 0 I 0 0 Philodromus sp. A 0 1 0 0 Tmarus sp. A 0 1 0 0 Xyticus emertoni Keyserling 0 0 0 12 Xyiicus ferox (Hentz) 0 0 0 1 Xyticus fraternm Banks 0 0 19 27 Xyticus funestus Keyserling 0 2 0 ! Salticidae Onondaga lineata (C. L. Koch) I 0 0 0 Paraphidippus sp. A 0 0 0 3 Sitticus sp. A 2 4 0 0 Salticid sp. A 0 0 4 0 Dictynidae Dictyna sp. A. 0 0 3 0 Total number of individuals 606 366 370 315 the Seep fen was heavily dominated by members of the Lycosidae, the Prairie and Forested fens contained significant numbers of non-lycosid spiders. Members of the Gnaphosidae and Club- ionidae comprised substantial proportions of the total number of individuals at both the Prairie (6.0% and 4.4%, respectively) and the Forested fens (10.2% and 6.0%, respectively; Fig. 2). The Oak-hickory forest differed from the fens, par- ticularly Seep and Prairie, in having large pro- portions of Gnaphosidae (20.3%) and Thomisi- dae (1 1.1%). In sum, family level comparisions somewhat mirror those at the species level; both the Seep and Prairie fen spider faunas were more similar to one another than they were to the For- ested fen, while spiders from the latter was more similar to those from the Oak-hickory forest. Abundances of cursorial spiders were greatest in May and declined through the summer in the Prairie and Forested fen and the surrounding Oak- hickory forest. In contrast, spiders from the Seep fen occurred in fairly constant numbers over the sampling season (Fig. 3). Differences among fens in seasonal trends in abundance are primarily due to the occurrence of P. insularis. Mature males and females were found in large numbers throughout the four month sampling period. In contrast, other species showed early summer peaks in abundance of mature individuals. Since few immatures were included in the analysis, species at the Prairie and Forested fens showed a decline in abundance over the summer. If im- matures could have been included in the anal- ysis, then spider abundances for these fens would probably not have declined in this way. Thus, differences in seasonal abundance patterns among fens (Fig. 3) reflect abundances of adults, not immatures and adults. Nonetheless, it is of in- terest that P. insularis exhibited a phenology fair- ly atypical of the species in this study; mature adults were abundant from May through August. Table 2.— Jaccard’s coefficient of similarity for com- parisons of the presence/absence of species at the fen and non-fen habitats. Seep Prairie Forested Oak- hickory Seep - 0.4571 0.1613 0.1667 Prairie — 0.1892 0.2500 Forested Oak-hickory — 0.2727 170 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY • — '9 Seep O — O Prairie V — V Forested May June July August Figure 1. — Foliage height diversity (FHD) for fen and non-fen habitats during the four sample months. 100 -i 8 c (Q ■o Xi < o > ’■J3 W Q) tr Seep Prairie Oak-Hickory Forested ^ Lycosidae ^ Gnaphosidae ^ Clubionidae 10 Thomisidae □ Other Site Figure 2. — Family composition of spiders sampled by pitfall trap at fens and surrounding non-fen habitat. BULTMAN- CURSORIAL SPIDERS FROM MISSOURI FENS 171 o z 5 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Seep 0' — '0 Prairie O O Forested V— -V Oak-Hickory □ \ MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST Figure 3.— Abundance of cursorial spiders sampled by pitfall trap at fens and surrounding non-fen habitat. Bars equal 1 SEM. Females of F. insularis were collected with egg cases in June, July, and August. It is not clear if these represent multiple generations or one gen- eration that breeds over a long period of time. That penultimate females were only found dur- ing the month of May argues in favor of the latter possibility. Tests for interspecific association (Schluter 1984) within species of the Lycosidae, Clubi- onidae, and Gnaphosidae among the three fen habitats showed no negative associations be- tween species (Table 3). These tests evaluate whether species of the relatively diverse wolf and running spider families show nonrandom pat- terns of presence/absence across the three fens. One might expect that members would preempt resource space within a fen and thereby prohibit the presence of another species of that family. That is, each fen might not have a full comple- ment of species due to competitive exclusion from some fens by some species. The test for inter- specific association however, gives no evidence for this conclusion. There is no interspecific com- petition acting to effect the observed pattern of presence/absence by wolf and running spiders in the fens. CONCLUSIONS My results show that spiders from the Prairie fen and particularly the Seep fen differ markedly from those from the surrounding Oak-hickory forest. In contrast, the spider fauna from the For- ested fen is more similar to that at the Oak- hickory forest. Abundances of adult spiders de- clined over the summer in all habitats, except the Seep fen. Tests for interspecific association among wolf and running spider species at the fen habitats gave no evidence for competitive dis- Table 3. — Results of Variance Ratio analysis as a test of interspecific species association among wolf and running spiders (Clubionidae and Gnaphosidae) among the three fen types. Schluter’s (1984) Variance Ratio is VR. W is the test statistic associated with the vari- ance ratio test. * = Number of spiders present. ** = Spider species show a significant positive association among the 3 fen habitats. Guild S* VR W P Wolf spiders 13 1.9 5.7 ns Running spiders 20 1.4 4.2 <0.05** 172 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY placment. Furthermore, spiders collected from fens showed differences at the species and family levels among fen types. That cursorial spiders differ from fen to fen is noteworthy. Spiders, as generalist, mobile predators, might not be ex- pected to respond to the somewhat subtle flo- ristic differences between fen types. The fact that they do underscores the biotic differences be- tween these habitats. Spiders, as common sec- ondary consumers, are extremely important predators in natural ecosystems (Riechert 1974) and as such are excellent biological indicators of community- and ecosystem-level organization. Differences in spider faunas associated with hab- itats should indicate fundamental biological dif- ferences between those habitats. Implications of my findings are that management of the Grass- hopper Hollow complex should incorporate the autonomy that exists between fen types. The fen complex should not be treated as a single unit with one management plan. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS P. Miller, N. Platnick and J. Redner kindly made taxonomic identification of difficult spec- imens. This work was supported through funding from the Missouri Department of Conserva- tion’s Small Grants Program. LITERATURE CITED Aley, T. J. 1978. Ozark hydrology: a perspective model. Missouri Speleology, Vol. 18, 185 pp. Jaccard, P. 1908. Nouvelles recherches sur la distri- bution florale. Bull. Soc. Sci. Nat., 44:223-270. Kaston, B.J. 1978. How to know the spiders. Wm C. Brown Company, Publ., Dubuque, Iowa. Kaston, B.J. 1981. Spiders of Connecticut. Connect- icut State Geol. and Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 2nd Ed., 70:1-1020. Murdoch, W. W., F. C. Evans, & C.H. Peterson. 1 972. Diversity and patterns in plants and insects. Ecol- ogy, 53:819-829. Nelson, P. W. 1985. The terrestrial natural com- munities of Missouri. Missouri Nat. Areas Com- mittee. Jefferson City, Missouri. Orzell, S. L. 1983. Natural area inventory and flo- ristic analysis of fens in selected southeastern Mis- souri counties. MS thesis. Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, Illinois. Riechert, S. E. 1974. Thoughts on the ecological sig- nificance of spiders. BioScience, 24:352-356. Shannon, C.E. 1948. A mathematical theory of com- munication. Bell Inst. Tech. J., 27:379-423, 623- 656. Schluter, D. 1984. A variance test for detecting spe- cies associations, with some example applications. Ecology, 65:998-1005. Thom, R. H. & G. Iffrig. 1985. Directory of Missouri natural areas. Missouri Dept, of Conserv., Jefferson City, Missouri. Thom, R. H. & J. H. Wilson. 1980. The natural divisions of Missouri. Trans. Missouri. Acad. Sci., 84:9-23. Uetz, G. W. 1977. Coexistence in a guild of wan- dering spiders. J. Anim. Ecol., 46:531-542. Uetz, G. W. & J. D. Unzicker. 1976. Pitfall trapping in ecological studies of wandering spiders. J. Ar- achnol., 3:101-111. Willson, M. 1974. Avian community structure and habitat structure. Ecology, 55:1017-1029. Manuscript received 22 March 1992, revised 15 August 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:173-178 WEB ORIENTATION, THERMOREGULATION, AND PREY CAPTURE EFFICIENCY IN A TROPICAL FOREST SPIDER Leslie Bishop and Sean R. Connolly: Department of Biology, Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana 47374 USA ABSTRACT. No correlation was found between the web angle and the directional web orientation (in relation to the sun) for the orb webs of Leucauge regnyi in the Luquillo Forest of Puerto Rico. These data suggest that the web angle of L. regnyi is not a thermoregulatory response. In addition, prey capture efficiency of sticky traps placed at the mean angle of webs of L. regnyi is compared with traps placed at vertical and horizontal orientations in three sites in this tropical forest. Prey captured in sticky traps indicate a trend of prey availability in this ecosystem: vertically oriented traps catch fewer prey than horizontal traps or traps at the mean angle of web orientations; at sites of little or intermediate ecological disturbance, mean angle orientations catch more prey than horizontal orientations. Although confirmation that traps and spiders capture the same types of prey is lacking, it may be that in this tropical forest system, more prey are made available to spiders with horizontal and nearly horizontal web orientations than to spiders with vertical webs. INTRODUCTION A number of orb-weaving spiders, including Metabus, Tetragnatha, Conoculus, Uloborus, Gasteracantha and Leucauge, weave webs that vary in their orientation relative to the degree to which they are in vertical versus horizontal planes (Eberhard 1971, 1989, 1990;Buskirk 1975; Cha- con & Eberhard 1980). However, no conclusive explanation has been offered for this horizontal rather than vertical orientation (Eberhard 1 990). It has been postulated that: 1) horizontal orbs receive less damage by the wind (Eberhard 1971), but others (Biere & Uetz 1981) found that wind did not affect web orientation; 2) the oscillations of nearly horizontal orb webs effectively inter- cept slow flying dipterans (Craig et al. 1985; Eberhard 1990); and 3) a more horizontal ori- entation may allow a spider to build closer to a microhabitat containing abundant prey (Eber- hard 1990), or to utilize limited support struc- tures for web building (Buskirk 1975). A corre- lation between web size and angle found by Eberhard (1988) may also be due to habitat struc- ture. Some webs of varying angle, however, have been observed where structure is available for vertical webs and a non-vertical orientation does not appear to increase proximity to an advan- tageous microhabitat (Eberhard 1971, 1990). Web angle may also affect rates of prey capture. Chacon & Eberhard (1980) and Craig (1987) dis- cuss three factors determining the prey capture efficiency of a spider web: the probability of in- sect encountering the web, the absorption by the web of the prey’s kinetic energy, and the reten- tion of prey on the web. Vertical webs appear to be favored in at least the first and last of these criteria. Chacon & Eberhard (1980) found that vertical sticky traps in an open field caught nearly three times as many prey as horizontal sticky traps and twice as many as inclined (45°) traps. Eberhard (1986) suggests that horizontal webs decrease effective distance between silk strands for prey moving horizontally, and thus make such orientations energetically costly. Horizontal webs do not retain prey as well as vertical webs, since prey freeing themselves from strands of vertical webs tend to fall into lower strands (Eberhard 1989). Habitat structure may affect this apparent re- lationship between web angle and prey capture. Spiders that build nearly horizontal webs occur in forest and edge microhabitats (Milne & Milne 1980), as well as across streams (Buskirk 1975) and in deserts (Eberhard 1971). Perhaps insect flight patterns differ according to habitat struc- ture. Eberhard (1990) has suggested that hori- zontal webs may capture prey falling from above. Numbers of prey falling from above may be high- er in a forest than in an open field, since forest vegetation grows to a height from which prey may fall and be intercepted by a web. To date, most studies on the directional ori- entation (North-South) of orb webs have not em- 173 174 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY phasized prey capture efficiency, [but see Tol- bert’s work on Argiope (1979) and various studies of colonial Metepeira spp. (Uetz & Cangialosi 1986; Uetz 1989; Uetz & Hodge 1990)]. Most studies attribute a thermoregulatory role to the directional orientation of webs (Carrel 1978; Tolbert 1979; Biere & Uetz 1981; Caine & Hei- ber 1 987). Yet only a few studies have speculated on possible thermoregulatory aspects of web an- gle (vertical vs horizontal): Krakauer (1972) sug- gests that the slight angle of the webs of Nephila clavipes facilitates postural thermoregulation, and Tolbert (1979) argues that a vertical orientation allows a spider to heat up rapidly early and late in the day by exposing a large surface area to the sun, and keeps it from overheating at midday by exposing a small surface area to the sun. Thus there may be important thermoregulatory as- pects of web angle. Specifically, the interaction of vertical angle and directional orientation may affect the surface area of the spider exposed to direct sunlight, and may, therefore, play a ther- moregulatory role. The tropical orb weaver Leucauge regnyi (Te- tragnathidae) (Simon), that inhabits the Luquillo forest of Puerto Rico, has been observed to build webs of varying angles (vertical-horizontal) in habitats ranging from treefall gaps to forests with dense canopies (Bishop, pers. obs.). Consequent- ly, information on the web building behavior and ecology of this species might contribute to our understanding of the thermoregulatory impli- cations of web angle and the prey availability patterns of the forest ecosystems inhabited by horizontal orb-weavers. This study attempts to investigate what factors affect the angle of the orb webs of L. regnyi. We will test two specific hypotheses: 1) the angle of the web of L. regnyi is a behavioral thermoregulatory response, and 2) the angle of the webs of L. regnyi maximizes prey capture. METHODS Study Site. — During June 1991, we studied Leucauge regnyi at the El Verde field station in the Luquillo Experimental Forest of Puerto Rico, a tropical tabonuco forest (Brown et al. 1983). Hypothesis 1: Thermoregulation.— We tested Hypothesis 1 in edge microhabitats where sun- light exposure is greatest and thermoregulatory mechanisms should be most pronounced. We measured the angles, in degrees of departure from vertical, of 200 webs using a clinometer (Suunto PM-5/360 PC). Webs were measured where the lowest value could be obtained, i.e., along the line on which the web was most vertical. When webs were not strictly planar, we used the mean of the web slant above (« = 1) and below (n = 1) the hub. We recorded the compass direction of the sun in the morning (1000 h) and the af- ternoon (1500 h). We also recorded the direction faced by the side of each web on which the spider rested. We measured the smallest angle between the direction faced by each web and each of the compass directions of the sun, respectively, yielding two values, a morning and afternoon directional angle, each between 0° and 1 80°, for each of the 200 webs. These values represented the web’s orientation relative to the sun, and they were examined for correlations with the angle of the spider webs. Hypothesis 2: Prey Capture Efficiency.— We collected prey capture data at three sites of vary- ing levels of disturbance due to the passage of Hurricane Hugo ( 1 989) through the forest. These areas of varying disturbance expose the spiders to differences in prey availability due to changes in forest structure among the sites (Bishop, pers. obs.). The high degree of variability among the sites should provide a rigorous test of the hy- pothesis: despite habitat type, the angle of the web maximizes prey capture in this forest eco- system. The three sites used in this study were the following — Least disturbance (Site 1): Most of the canopy-level trees were left standing after the hurricane, but with foliage and many branch- es damaged. By June 1991, the canopy was grow- ing back. Because this area was relatively undis- turbed, the understory remained relatively open. Intermediate disturbance (Site 2): This site was characterized by many fallen trees and branches, and dense successional growth (primarily Cecro- pia) generally 4-6 m tall. Most disturbance (Site 3): This site was in a treefall gap with very dense plant debris on the forest floor. In June 1991, successional growth was short (< 3 m). All prey capture data were collected using sticky traps, consisting of embroidery hoops 25 cm in diameter and covered on both sides with cheese cloth and pest glue (Stickem Special, R. Seabright Industries, Emeryville, California) and placed approximately 1.5 m off the ground. Traps were generally hung on the branches of saplings or on dead, fallen trees. First, in order to determine whether we would need to separate data from traps of varying directional orientation in testing Hypothesis 2 (Castillo & Eberhard 1983), we placed nine traps facing North/South and nine facing East/West and counted the prey inter- BISHOP & CONNOLLY ■=■ WEB ANGLE OF LEUCAUGE REGNYI 175 DIRECTIONAL ANGLE (MORNING) Figure L— Scattergram for the directional angle rel- ative to the morning sun (1000 h) and vertical angle of the orb webs of Leucauge regnyi (n = 200) in the Luquillo Experimental Forest of Puerto Rico. No cor- relation was found (N = 0.001, p > 0.05), so the equa- tion and line are not shown. Measurements are in de- grees. cepted during a 24 h period. The results were analyzed for significant differences using a G-test (Sokal & Rohlf 1987). We then used sticky traps to test prey avail- ability at each of the three disturbance sites. We positioned eight traps suspended by wire from the vegetation at each of three orientations for a 72 h period to determine prey availability: ver- tical, horizontal, and the mean angle of the actual webs of Leucauge regnyi at that site. We chose a three day sampling period to minimize error due to variation in prey availability caused by daily differences in weather or other periodical parameters, and we interspersed traps of different orientations within an area of approximately 20 m^. The mean angle orientation was determined from measurements of 50 web (all adult females) angles at each site, according to the equation for means from a normal distribution given by Krebs (1989). Mean angles at the sites were 55.5°, 63.6°, and 60.5° for sites 1, 2 and 3, respectively and variation among the means was significant (one- factor ANOVA; F = 3.5 1 8, T = 0.032). Fisher’s test indicates that only the difference between sites 1 and 2 was significant. We counted the insects captured on each trap and used G-tests to determine if there were sig- nificant differences in the number of prey cap- tured at each of the three sticky trap angles at each site. Multiple G-tests were used to allow DIRECTIONAL ANGLE (AFTERNOON) Figure 2.— Scattergram for the directional angle rel- ative to the afternoon sun (1500 h) and vertical angle of the orb webs of Leucauge regnyi {n = 200) in the Luquillo Experimental Forest of Puerto Rico. No cor- relation was found (A = 0.001, p > 0.05), so the equa- tion and line are not shown. Measurements are in de- grees. testing among specific orientations, so only high- ly significant results {P < 0.01) were accepted. RESULTS Thermoregulation.— The direction of the morning sun relative to web orientation was measured at 95° at 1000 h on 22 June 1991, and the direction of the afternoon sun was measured at 290° at 1 500 h on the same day. Web orien- tation relative to the sun ranged from 0° to 1 80° in both the morning and afternoon with no clear modal value. Web angles varied betv/een 0° and 90°, with a mean of 59° (SD = 17.86, n = 200 webs). We found no correlation between web po- sition relative to the sun and the angle of the webs in the morning or afternoon (morning: ri = 0.001, p >> 0.05, n = 200; afternoon: U = 0.001, P>> 0.05, n = 200) (Figs. 1, 2). Prey capture.— We found no significant dif- ferences in the number of insects captured by North/South versus East/West facing sticky traps (G-test: Gadj = 0.007, P > 0.9), so we did not separate sticky traps by direction for sampling at the three sites. At Site 1 (least disturbance), horizontal traps caught significantly more prey than vertical traps (G-test: Gadj = 43.118, P < 0.001), and mean angle traps caught significantly more prey than vertical traps (Gadj = 167.413, P < 0.001) and 176 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY eoo o UJ & CL SITE 1 ■ Vertical ^ Horizontal H Mean angle SITE 2 PLOT TYPE SITE 3 Figure 3.— Comparison of the total numbers of in- sects caught by vertical, horizontal, and mean angle sticky traps in three different plot types in the Fuquillo Experimental Forest of Puerto Rico. The mean angle was determined by measuring the angles of 50 webs of Leucauge regnyi at each site and calculating the means of those webs (55.5°, 63.6°, and 60.5° for sites 1, 2 and 3, respectively). Horizontal and mean angle traps caught significantly more prey than vertical traps at all three sites (G-test: p < 0.001 in each case). Mean angle traps caught significantly more prey than horizontal traps at sites 1 and 2 (G-test: p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences between the numbers of prey caught by horizontal and mean angle traps at site 3 (p > 0.1). horizontal traps = 42.200, P < 0.00 1 ). Like- wise, at Site 2 (intermediate disturbance), hori- zontal traps caught significantly more prey than vertical traps (G^dj = 55.839, P < 0.001), and mean angle traps caught significantly more prey than vertical traps (G^dj = 161.970, P < 0.001) and horizontal traps (G^dj = 29.073, P < 0.001). At site 3 (most disturbance), horizontal traps again caught significantly more prey than vertical traps (Gadj = 216.558, P < 0.001), and mean angle traps caught significantly more prey than vertical traps (Gadj = 239.659, P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between hor- izontal and mean angle traps, although mean an- gle traps caught slightly more prey (Gadj = 0.619, P > 0.1) (Fig. 3). DISCUSSION These results suggest that the web angle of Leu- cauge regnyi maximizes the web’s prey capture efficiency and is not influenced by the orientation of the web relative to the sun. This does not necessarily mean that thermoregulation exerts no influence on web angle. For example, Krakauer (1972) has argued that web angle may facilitate postural thermoregulation in Nephila clavipes. Because we did not quantify posturing behavior, further research is required before concluding that this facilitation does or does not occur in L. reg- nyi. The prey capture patterns from our data in a tropical forest contrast with the pattern of the open field studied by Chacon & Eberhard ( 1980), in which vertical traps caught the most prey and horizontal traps caught the fewest. In our study, vertical sticky traps caught significantly fewer prey than either horizontal or mean angle traps, and neither vertical nor horizontal traps caught more prey than the traps positioned at the mean angle of the spider webs measured. The fact that mean angle traps at the least and intermediate distur- bance sites caught significantly more prey than horizontal traps suggests that the advantage of the inclined orientation used by Leucauge regnyi may be even greater in these two sites. The data suggest that insect flight patterns in forest systems differ from those in open fields, as meteorological data on wind movement would imply (Pedgley 1982). Vegetation structure may be partly responsible for this. Forest structure probably allows for more vertical movement of insects, and this would account for results in which horizontal and inclined traps catch more prey relative to vertical traps than in an open field. Because mean angle traps did not catch significantly less prey than horizontal traps at any sites, and in fact caught more at two sites, it is unlikely that this pattern can be attributed ex- clusively to prey falling from above, as suggested by Eberhard ( 1 990). The smaller horizontal sweep of mean angle traps would result in fewer prey captured if this was the sole explanation (Eber- hard 1986). Rather, it appears more likely that mean angle traps interfere with more flight pat- terns than horizontal traps. It may also be more difficult for insects to see and avoid horizontal and mean angle traps (Craig 1 990). Although the reasons for the differences in prey capture found in this study cannot yet proceed beyond speculation, the results themselves raise significant problems for further research in the web ecology of spiders in forest systems. In light of the apparent greater efficiency of more hori- zontal orientations in intercepting available prey, the vertical orientation of most forest orb-weav- ers is surprising. However, before vertical ori- entations are ascribed wholly to other factors. BISHOP & CONNOLLY- WEB ANGLE OF LEUCAUGE REGNYI 177 such as thermal stress (Tolbert 1979; Caine & Heiber 1 987) or structure for web building (Eber- hard 1988), data on the planar prey availability of the actual prey of both horizontal and vertical orb weavers are needed. To avoid the inaccuracies that sticky traps would bring to such a study, actual webs with spiders would have to be reori- ented (Eberhard 1989) and observed during the foraging periods of the spiders studied. Further, data on horizontal and vertical orb v/eavers found in the same microhabitats would provide infor- mative comparisons. Although sticky trap data can be used for com- parisons and for the evaluation of web charac- teristics such as vertical angle, drawing conclu- sions about v/eb ecology from sticky trap data has been treated with skepticism (Castillo & Eberhard 1983; Eberhard 1990), due to the dif- ferences in the qualities of sticky traps and orb webs. Most notably, the sticky traps we used are much more visible than orb webs; thus, the fre- quencies and types of prey caught in our study may be different than those of actual webs. Sticky traps only mimic the encounter function of orb webs and capture potential prey items, not nec- essarily the actual prey of Leucauge regnyi. Fur- thermore, we did not classify the prey caught in our traps by taxon or size. However, because small dipterans constituted the overwhelming majority of sticky trap captures, and the same group also constitutes most of the diet of L. reg- nyi (Bishop, pers. obs.), and because the data showed an extremely high level of significance {P < 0.001 in all instances of significant differ- ences), the general trend may well be biologically significant. The significant differences in actual spider web angle among the sites may not be solely related to prey capture efficiency, although such a pos- sibility can not be ruled out. Vegetational differ- ences among sites may affect web angle by chang- ing the structure available for web building (Buskirk 1975; Gillespie 1987; Eberhard 1988), or web angle may vary as a response to some unknown parameter. The variation in orienta- tion among forest sites with different structure, along with the implications of the sticky trap results, add to current knowledge of the selective forces acting on spider webs, but the contrast that our findings present with past research further complicates the problem of thoroughly assessing the role of these forces on the evolution and ecol- ogy of orb web orientation. Most importantly, they indicate that relevant parameters may vary considerably among ecosystems. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was funded by a grant for un- dergraduate research from the Ford Foundation, awarded through Earlham College to Leslie Bish- op. Additional support was provided to Bishop by the Exline-Frizzell Fund of the California Academy of Sciences, and an Oak Ridge Asso- ciated Universities Faculty Travel Grant. We would like to express our gratitude to the staff of the El Verde Field Station (Center for Energy and Environmental Research, University of Puerto Rico) for the use of their facilities and for pro- viding access to the tropical study sites. We also thank Ann Rypstra and George Uetz for discus- sion and suggestions during the planning of this project, and Andrea Condit and Sandra Encalada for assistance in the field. Susan E. Riechert, Wil- liam Eberhard, and A1 Cady provided valuable reviews of the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Biere, J. M. & G. W. Uetz. 1981. Web orientation in the spider Micrathena gracilis (Araneae: Aranei- dae). Ecology, 62:336-345. Brown, S., A. E. Lugo, S. Silander & L. Liegel. 1983. Research history and opportunities in the Luquillo Experimental Forest. Institute of Tropical Forestry, SO-44. Buskirk, R. E. 1975. Coloniality, activity patterns and feeding in a tropical orb-weaving spider. Ecol- ogy, 56:1314-1328. Caine, L. A. & C. S. Heiber. 1987. Web orientation in the spider Mangora gibberosa (Hentz) (Araneae, Araneidae). J. Arachnol., 15:263-265. Carrel, J. E. 1978. Behavioral thermoregulation dur- ing winter in an orb-weaving spider. Symp. Zool. Soc. London, 42:41-50. Castillo, J. A. & W. G. Eberhard. 1983. Use of ar- tificial webs to determine prey available to orb weaving spiders. Ecology, 64:1655-1658. Chacon, P. & W. G. Eberhard. 1 980. Factors affecting numbers and kinds of prey caught in artificial spider webs, with considerations of how orb webs trap prey. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 5:29-38. Craig, C. L. 1987. The ecological and evolutionary interdependence between web architecture and web silk spun by orb web weaving spiders. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 30:135-162. Craig, C. L. 1990. Effects of background pattern on insect perception of webs spun by orb-weaving spi- ders. Anim. Behav., 39:135-144. Craig, C. L., A. Okubu & V. Andreasen. 1985. Effect of spider orb-web and insect oscillations on prey interception. J. Theor. Biol., 1 15:201-21 1. 178 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Eberhard, W. G. 1971. The ecology of the web of Uloboriis diversus (Araneae: Uloboridae). Oecolo- gia, 6:328-342. Eberhard, W. G. 1986. Effects of orb-web geometry on prey interception and retention. Pp. 70-100, In Spiders: webs, behavior, and evolution. (W. A. Shear, ed.). Stanford University Press; Stanford, Califor- nia. Eberhard, W. G. 1988. Behavioral flexibility in orb web construction: effects of supplies in different silk glands and spider size and weight. J. Arachnol., 16: 295-302. Eberhard, W. G. 1 989. Effects of orb web orientation and spider size on prey retention. Bull. British Ar- achnol. Soc., 8:45-48. Eberhard, W. G. 1990. Function and phylogeny of spider webs. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 21:341-372. Gillespie, R. G. 1987. The mechanism of habitat selection in the long-jawed orb-weaving spider Te- tragnatha elongata (Araneae, Tetragnathidae. J. Ar- achnol., 15:81-90. Krakauer, T. 1972. Thermal responses of the orb- weaving spider, N. clavipes. American Midi. Nat., 88:245-250. Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper and Row, New York. Milne, L. & M. Milne. 1980. The Audubon Soc. Field Guide to North American Insects and Spiders. Al- fred A. Knopf, New York. Pedgley, D. E. 1982. Windbome Pests and Diseases: the meteorology of airborne organisms. Halsted Press, New York. Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf. 1987. Introduction to Biostatistics. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York. Tolbert. W.W. 1979. Thermal stress of the orb weav- ing spider Argiope trifasciata (Araneae). Oikos, 32: 386-392. Uetz, G. W. 1989. The “ricochet effect” and prey capture in colonial spiders. Oecologia, 81:154-159. Uetz, G. W. & K. R. Cangialosi. 1986. Genetic dif- ferences in social behavior and spacing in popula- tions of Metapeira spinipes, a communal-territorial orb weaver (Araneae, Araneidae). J. Arachnol., 14: 159-173. Uetz, G. W. & M. A. Hodge. 1990. Influence of hab- itat and prey availability on spatial organization and behavior of colonial web-building spiders. Nat. Geog. Res., 6:22-40. Manuscript received 24 October 1991, revised 29 August 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:179-188 NUMERICAL RESPONSE TO PREY ABUNDANCE BY ZYGIELLA X-NOTATA (ARANEAE, ARANEIDAE) David A. Spiller; Department of Zoology and Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 USA ABSTRACT. To test the effect of prey abundance on the orb spider Zygiella x-notata I conducted two field experiments at the same site. In the first experiment, from 20 June to 9 September 1978, I augmented prey abundance in two plots interspersed within four control plots; at the end of the experiment the mean number of spiders was 2.7 times higher in prey-augmented plots than in control plots, and the difference was highly significant {P = 0.005). In the second experiment, from 25 June to 16 September 1979, I augmented prey abundance in one plot located in between two control plots; at the end of the experiment the number of spiders was > 3.0 times higlier in the prey-augmented plot than in each control plot. Although numbers of spiders in the 1979 experiment could not be analyzed statistically because the treatment was not replicated, they support the results of the 1978 experiment. I monitored the phenology of the population at the experimental site and an unmanipulated population at a different site throughout 1978 and 1979. In both years reproduction began earlier in the experimental population than in the unmanipulated population. In 1979 I collected eggs sacs in both populations. The experimental population contained more eggs and heavier eggs than those than in the unmanipulated population. Within the experimental population, egg sacs in the prey-augmented plot contained heavier eggs than those in control plots. Numerous comparative and experimental studies indicate that spiders often experience food shortages in nature (review in Wise 1992). How- ever, the evidence that spider population sizes respond numerically to temporal fluctuations in prey abundance is equivocal. Some observation- al studies found positive correlations between abundances of spiders and their potential prey (e.g., Wingerden 1978) but others found no cor- relation (e.g., Greenstone 1978). Furthermore, a positive correlation could be due to both spiders and their prey responding to some other envi- ronmental factor. An experimental study in rice fields showed that spider densities increased in areas where Drosophila flies were released rela- tive to control areas (Kobayashi 1975); unfor- tunately, problems in experimental design and presentation of statistical tests make it difficult to assess the observed response (Wise 1 992). Sev- eral studies showed that spiders moved from ar- eas with low prey abundance to areas with high prey abundance (Riechert & Gillespie 1986); this “aggregative response” (Hassell & May 1974) changes the predator’s distribution, but not nec- essarily the predator’s population size. Extensive studies of Agelenopsis aperta (Gertsch) demon- strated that reproductive success was related to prey availability (Riechert & Tracy 1975); how- ever, population size was limited by suitable web sites (via territoriality), and was not influenced by prey abundance (Riechert 1981). Several possible factors could restrict a nu- merical response by spiders. Riechert & Lockley (1984) suggested that the extent to which spiders respond numerically is limited by long genera- tion tim,es of spiders relative to their prey and by strong self limitation within spider popula- tions. Field experiments indicate that predators may often reduce spider populations (Askenmo 1977; Gunnarsson 1983; Wise 1982; Pacala & Roughgarden 1984; Polls & McCormick 1986; Spiller & Schoener 1988). Frequently, both spi- ders and their predators eat some of the same types of prey (Polls et al. 1989; Spiller & Schoe- ner 1990). Therefore, a numerical response by spiders could be impeded by spider predators responding numerically to the same prey. Wise (1992) concluded that although many field ex- periments have shown that food shortages limit spider growth rate and fecundity, more experi- ments are needed to determine whether these parameters are translated into increased popu- lation size in the next generation. Zygiella x-notata (Clerck) is a common orb spider in coastal areas of California (Gertsch 1 964; Levi 1974). In this study, to test for a numerical response by Z. x-notata I conducted two prey- augmentation experiments at the same site. In 179 180 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1.— Mean (1 SE) web radii and estimated mean web areas for different size classes of Z. x-notata. Mean web areas were estimated by assuming that webs were circular (which they were approximately). Class Body length (mm) n Web radius (cm) Esti- mated mean web area (cmq Hatchlings <2.0 40 3.3 (0.1) 34 Juveniles 2.0-3.9 36 6.3 (0.2) 125 Subadults 4.0-5. 9 42 8.4 (0.3) 222 Adult females >6.0 103 11.4 (0.3) 415 addition, I compared some life-history charac- teristics of the population at the experimental site to those of an unmanipulated population at a different site. METHODS Censusing procedures.— ZygtW/a x-notata adult females are about 6. 0-8.0 mm in body length (measured from the chelicerae to the pos- terior end of the abdomen). Adult males are about 4. 5-6. 5 mm. In this study I divided the spiders into 4 age/size classes: hatchlings (< 2.0 mm), juveniles (2.0-3. 9 mm), subadults (4. 0-5. 9 mm) and adults (> 6.0 mm and smaller adult males). During field censuses I counted the numbers of spiders in each class. To test my accuracy in size determination, I assigned 90 individuals to these size classes in the field, and then collected and measured them with an ocular micrometer; 83% were assigned to the correct size class. I censused two Z. x-notata populations re- peatedly for over two years. The first population inhabited a group of 1 1 abandoned cabins lo- cated about 100 m inland from the beach at Coal Oil Point, which is approximately 2 km west of the University of California, Santa Barbara Cam- pus. Most spiders nested underneath ledges that were 1.5 m above the ground and surrounded each cabin. I censused all individuals within 0.5 m of the ledges (total area censused was 162 m^) about once a month from November 1977 to June 1980. The second population inhabited an assemblage of large boulders, constructed for erosion control, at the base of a cliff on the Uni- versity of California, Santa Barbara Campus Beach. The assemblage was about 100 m long and 6 m wide, and was about 0.5- 1.0 m above mean higher high water. The spiders built their orbs in caves formed by the boulders and caught mostly flies that bred in drift kelp on the beach. I censused all individuals within a 48 m x 6 m section of boulders about once a month from October 1977 to February 1980. The first pop- ulation was unmanipulated whereas the second was prey augmented (see below). Beginning in July 1 978, 1 recorded the number of egg sacs and the numbers of arthropods in the spiders’ webs and being consumed by the spiders in each site. For each census I computed an index of prey availability by dividing the total number of arthropods counted by the estimated total area of webs censused. I computed the total area of webs censused from the numbers of spiders with webs in each size class and the estimated mean web area of each size class. Mean web area was estimated by measuring the radii of a large sam- ple of webs in the field (Table 1). Prey-augmentation experiments,— On 19 June 1978, 1 divided the 48 m x 6 m section of boul- ders into six contiguous 8 m x 6 m plots, and then censused each plot. From 20 June to 9 Sep- tember 1978 I augmented prey abundance in the second and fifth plots; thus, there were two treat- ment plots and four control plots (Fig. 1). I chose this arrangement, rather than assigning treat- ments randomly, to ensure that treatment plots were interspersed within control plots, as sug- gested by Hurlbert (1984). To augment prey abundance, I put large quantities of drift kelp at the bottom of caves within the treatment plots during the first few days of the experiment, and added smaller amounts of kelp and sea water about twice a week. I censused each plot at about 1-2 wk intervals from 25 June to 10 September 1978, and at about 2-3 wk intervals from 24 September to 10 December 1978. On 24 June 1979, 1 divided the same 48 m x 6 m section of boulders into three contiguous 16 m X 6 m plots, and then censused each plot. From 25 June to 16 September 1979 I put kelp in the center plot; thus, there was one treatment in between two controls (Fig. 1). I chose this arrangement so that prey was augmented in a different location in this year than in the previous year. I censused each plot about once a month from July to December 1979. Egg sac collections.— From 2 September to 1 5 October 1979 I collected all egg sacs at the un- manipulated site and all that I could find in each plot at the experimental site (I might have missed some sacs located inside crevices at the experi- SPILLER-NUMERICAL RESPONSE BY ZYGIELLA X-NOTATA 181 mental site). During this time period I visited each site at least twice a week and collected each new sac produced. All the eggs from each sac were counted, dried at 60 °C for 24 hr, and weighed together. I did not analyze sacs contain- ing hatchlings. Analyses.— To assess whether adding kelp to the treatment plots increased prey availability during the experiment in 1978, I computed the mean index of prey availability (number of prey/ m- web) recorded in each plot from 25 June (first census after I began adding kelp) to 1 0 September (one day after my last addition), and then com- pared the mean indices in treatment and control plots with a one-tailed t test. To test the overall treatment effect on Z. x-notata in 1978, I per- formed a one-tailed t test on total number of individuals in each plot on 10 September; in addition, I analyzed the change in total number of individuals in each plot from 1 9 June (the day before the experiment) to 10 September. Prey- availability indices, numbers of egg sacs and numbers of each age/size class recorded during each census are given for descriptive purposes, but they are not statistically analyzed. I present the data recorded during the 1979 experiment for descriptive purposes, but the treatment effect cannot be tested statistically because kelp was added to only one plot. From the data on egg sacs collected in 1979, I analyzed two variables: number of eggs per sac and mean biomass per egg per sac. I treated each of the three plots in the experimental site and the unmanipulated site as four separate groups. For each variable I performed a one-way ANO- VA with three contrasts. Two contrasts tested the variation among plots within the experimen- tal site (treatment vs. control 1 + control 2; con- trol 1 vs. control 2) and one contrast tested the variation between sites (experimental site [all plots] vs. unmanipulated site). The purpose of these tests is to describe the extent to which the variables in the areas differed, but they cannot be interpreted directly as tests of the hypothesis that the spiders are food limited. RESULTS Life-history observations,— The population at the unmanipulated site exhibited an annual life cycle (Fig. 2). In 1978, a cohort emerged in early spring, matured during late spring and early sum- mer, reproduced during late summer and fall, and declined during fall and winter. The offspring produced in 1978 overwintered in egg sacs and 1978 Cl Tl C2 C3 T2 C4 1979 C 1 T C2 Figure 1.— Spatial design of the prey-augmentation experiments. In 1978 prey abundance was augmented in plots T1 and T2. In 1979 prey abundance was aug- mented in plot T (see Methods for details). emerged during late winter and early spring 1979. This cohort matured during late spring and early summer, reproduced during late summer and fall, and declined during fail and winter. Note that I collected 19 egg sacs from 2 September to 15 October 1979; 27 egg sacs were produced from 16 October 1979 to 15 January 1980. The off- spring produced by the 1979 cohort emerged during late winter and early spring 1980 and de- veloped later in the spring. Prey-availability in- dices were relatively high during winter and spring, and were relatively low during summer and fall. The phenology of the experimental population was more complex (Fig. 3). Hatchlings emerged in fall 1977 but they either died or emigrated during severe winter storms. (During a storm in January 1978 I observed waves breaking on the boulders; the next day no spider was present in the site.) The site was apparently recolonized in late winter and spring 1978 by juveniles and su- badults. This cohort matured in late spring and early summer 1978, and some adult females re- produced in early summer. A second cohort emerged later in the summer and developed in fall 1978. Two cohorts emerged in 1979. The first emerged during late winter and early spring and matured later in the spring. Some adult fe- males reproduced in early summer 1979. The second cohort emerged later in the summer and developed in fall 1 979. Note that this cohort was relatively small because I collected all visible egg sacs within the censused area from 2 September to 1 5 October 1979; hatchlings that were counted during this time period emerged either from hid- den sacs within the censused area or from sacs outside the censused area. Prey-availability indices tended to be higher at the experimental site than at the unmanipu- 182 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 2. — Prey-availability indices (no. prey/m^ web) and numbers of Z. x-notala in the unmanipulated site. Prey availability index and number of egg sacs were not recorded in the initial 10 censuses. Egg sacs were collected from 2 September to 15 October 1979. lated site, particularly during the summer when kelp was added to the treatment plots. For all censuses, mean ± 1 SD of the prey-availability indices at the experimental site and the unman- ipulated site were respectively, 45.8 ± 42.9 and 16.6 ± 23. 1. For censuses in summer (1978 and 1979), mean ± 1 SD of indices at the experi- mental site and the unmanipulated site were re- spectively, 60.4 ± 40.7 and 3.79 ± 1.82. Prey-augmentation experiment in 1978. — On 1 9 June (one day before kelp was added to treat- ment plots), prey-availability indices and num- bers of spiders in treatment and control plots did not dilfer significantly (Table 2). During the ex- periment mean prey-availability indices were significantly higher in treatments than in con- trols. On 10 September mean number of spiders was 2.7 times higher in prey-augmented plots than in control plots, and the difference was high- ly significant. Numbers of spiders increased in all plots from 19 June to 10 September; the in- crease was significantly greater in treatments than in controls. Details in Fig. 4 show that in July mean num- bers of adults became higher in treatments than in controls, whereas mean numbers of smaller individuals were nearly identical in treatments and controls. In August mean numbers of egg sacs became higher in treatments than in con- trols. In September hatchlings emerged from the egg sacs and mean numbers of immature spiders became higher in treatments than in controls. Shortly after I stopped adding kelp to the treat- ments, prey-availability indices were about equal in treatments and controls, but numbers of spi- ders remained higher in treatments for a few months. Prey-augmentation experiment in 1979.— On 24 June (one day before kelp was added to the treatment plot) prey-availability indices and SPILLER-= NUMERICAL RESPONSE BY ZYGIELLA X-NOTATA 183 Figure 3.— Prey-availability indices (no. prey/m^ web) and numbers of Z. x-notata in the experimental site. Prey-availability index and number of egg sacs were not recorded in the initial eight censuses. Egg sacs were collected from 2 September to 15 October 1979. Arrows depict time periods when kelp was added to treatment plots. Table 2.— Prey-availability indices (no. prey/m^ web) on 19 June (one day before kelp was added to treatment plots), mean of the indices from 25 June (first census during kelp additions) to 10 September (one day after the last kelp additions) and total numbers of spiders and change in numbers (number on 10 September minus number on 19 June) in each plot during the 1978 prey-augmentation experiment. [‘ one-tailed test; each test was performed on the numbers given in each column.] Plot No. prey/m^ web Mean of 25 June to 19 June 10 Sept. Total number of spiders 19 June 10 Sept. Change Treatment 1 10.2 84.2 55 491 436 Treatment 2 11.3 108.6 63 680 617 Control 1 9.3 8.3 133 327 194 Control 2 6.0 16.4 80 182 102 Control 3 16.3 19.3 45 173 128 Control 4 64.1 57.2 37 183 143 II 0.65 3.96 0.44 4.61 6.14 P 0.553 0.008' 0.677 0.005' 0.002' 184 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 0^ bJ m PREY/m^ WEB TREATMENTS 0---0 CONTROLS 25 9 30 13 27 10 JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT 19 NOV DEC Figure 4. — Mean ± 1 SE prey-availability indices {no. prey/m^ web) and numbers of Z. x-notata in treatment and control plots during the 1978 prey-augmentation experiment. The arrow depicts the time period when kelp was added to treatment plots. numbers of spiders were similar in the treatment and control plots (Fig. 5). On 29 July prey-avail- ability index and number of egg sacs were higher in the treatment than in controls but numbers of spiders remained about the same. On 25 August prey-availability index and numbers of egg sacs, hatchlings, subadults and adults were higher in the treatment than in controls. On 16 September SPILLER-- NUMERICAL RESPONSE BY ZYGIELLA X-NOTATA 185 LlJ QQ TREATMENT CONTROL 1 CONTROL 2 JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC Figure 5.— Prey-availabiiity indices (no. prey/m^ web) and numbers of Z. x-notata in the treatment and control plots during the 1979 prey-augmentation experiment. The arrow depicts the time period when kelp was added to treatment plots. Egg sacs were collected from 2 September to 1 5 October. prey-availability index and numbers of all spider classes were higher in the treatment than in con- trols; total number of spiders was >3.0 times higher in the treatment than in each control plot. (Note that this year egg sacs were collected from 2 September to 15 October.) Prey-availability indices and numbers of spiders remained higher in the treatment than in controls for a few months after I stopped adding kelp to the treatments. Egg sacs collected in 1979. — Within the ex- 186 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 3. —Mean (1 SE) number of eggs and mean biomass per egg in Z. x-notata sacs collected from 2 September to i 5 October 1979. Prey was augmented in the treatment plot at the experimental site. [‘ one-tailed test.] Site Plot n No. of eggs/sac Mean biomass (mg)/egg/sac Experimental Treatment 27 74.1 (3.6) 0.163(0.004) Control 1 13 66.7 (6.0) 0.146 (0.006) Control 2 6 63.7(8.8) 0.145 (0.003) Unmanipulated 19 51.5(2.9) 0.130(0.005) ANOVA: df SS J P Number of eggs Treatment vs. Controls 1 + 2 1 814.6 2.45 0.06 12‘ Control 1 vs. Control 2 1 37.6 0.11 0.7377 Experimental vs. Unmanipulated Error 1 61 3299.9 20 261.5 9.93 0.0013' Mean biomass/egg Treatment vs. Controls 1 + 2 1 0.00303 7.30 0.0044' Control 1 vs. Control 2 1 0.00000 0.00 0.9544 Experimental vs. Unmanipulated Error 1 61 0.00561 0.02529 13.53 0.0003' perimental site mean biomass per egg was sig- nificantly greater in the treatment than in control plots (Table 3). Numbers of eggs per sac tended to be higher in the treatment than in control plots, but the difference was not significant at the 0.05 level. Numbers of eggs and mean biomasses per egg in the two control plots were very similar. Number of eggs and mean biomass per egg were significantly greater in the experimental site than in the unmanipulated site. DISCUSSION Phenologies of unmanipulated and experi- mental populations differed considerably. The unmanipulated population reproduced during late summer and fall, and the next generation emerged during late winter and early spring in the follow- ing year. The experimental population began to reproduce in early summer, and some of the next generation emerged later in the same season. In addition, egg sacs produced in the experimental population contained more eggs and heavier eggs than those produced in the unmanipulated pop- ulation. Field experiments on other web spiders showed that growth rates or fecundities were influenced by food supply (Wise 1975, 1979; Spiller 1984; Spiller & Schoener 1990). My indices of prey availability during summer 1978 and summer 1979 were much higher at the experimental site than at the unmanipulated site. This suggests that the differences between populations in life-his- tory characteristics were influenced by higher prey abundance at the experimental site. However, this interpretation should be taken with caution for two reasons. First, differences between sites in physical factors (e.g., temperature) might have influenced life-history characteristics. Second, my indices of prey availability did not take into ac- count the size of individual prey; therefore, were prey sizes larger at the unmanipulated site than at the experimental site, comparisons between sites could be misleading. Within the experimental population, egg sacs in the treatment plot contained heavier eggs than those in controls. Although this difference was statistically significant, the analysis does not demonstrate that it was caused by prey abun- dance because in 1979 the treatment was not replicated (Hurlbert 1984). Hence, comparisons among plots within the experimental population are subject to the same caveats as the comparison between populations. However, the fact that the treatment plot was in between the two control plots, and egg biomasses in control 1 and control 2 were nearly identical, provides compelling ev- idence that prey abundance influenced egg bio- masses. Number of eggs per sac tended to be SPILLER- NUMERICAL RESPONSE BY ZYGIELLA X-NOTATA 187 higher in the treatment plot than in the controls but the difference was not significant at the 0.05 level. Possibly, the number of eggs that a repro- ductive female produces in a sac is determined before the biomass of each egg. Therefore, if an adult female moved from a control plot to the treatment plot after number of eggs was deter- mined, the increased food supply might have increased egg biomass but not number of eggs. The prey-augmentation experiment in 1978 demonstrated that Z. x-notata responded nu- merically to prey abundance. During July and August numbers of adults became higher in treat- ments than in controls. Three different mecha- nisms could have produced this result: 1 . adults moved from control plots to treatment plots, 2. adult survivorship was higher in treatments than in controls, or 3. developmental rate of imma- tures was higher in treatments than in controls. Because marked individuals were not followed during the experiment I cannot assess the im- portance of these possible mechanisms. Follow- ing the increase in adults, numbers of egg sacs became higher in treatments than in controls; subsequently, the numerical response became more pronounced when the second generation emerged in September. During the 1979 exper- iment numbers of spiders became substantially higher in the treatment plot than in control plots. I could not statistically analyze the results of this experiment because the treatment was not rep- licated in 1979. However, the data support the overall results of the 1978 experiment. Rypstra’s (1983) enclosure experiments showed that food abundance influenced densities of sev- eral web-spider species; interestingly, some sol- itary species exhibited some degree of coloniality when prey abundance was high (Rypstra 1986). Although Z. x-notata is typically solitary, other studies found that individuals were attracted to conspecific silk, and that some individuals re- duced their web sizes in response to crowding (Leborgne & Pasquet 1 987a, 1 987b). In this study, Z. x-notata webs were occasionally attached to one another in treatment plots when prey avail- ability was high. Such behavior might have fa- cilitated the numerical response by Z. x-notata. An important factor that accounted for the numerical response by Z. x-notata was the emer- gence of a second generation in the same year. Many spider species have obligatory annual life cycles, and would probably not exhibit such a marked numerical response within a season (Riechert & Lockley 1984). Thus, the extent to which spiders respond numerically may depend on the behavior and phenology of the species. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank Joseph H. Connell for his en- couragement and support. I thank M. Fawcett and N. Spiller for field assistance, H. Levi for identifying specimens, and L. Bishop, M. Green- stone, T. Schoener, and D. Wise for comments. I was supported by NSF grant BSR90-20052 while preparing the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Askenmo, C., A. von Broemssen, J. Eckman & C. Jans- son. 1977. Impact of some wintering birds on spi- der abundance in spruce. Oikos, 28:90-94. Gertsch, W. J. 1964. The spider genus Zygiella in North America (Araneae: Argiopidae). American Mus. Novit., 2188:1-21. Greenstone, M. H. 1978. The numerical response to prey availability of Pardosa mmulosa (McCook) (Araneae: Lycosidae) and its relationship to the role of spiders in the balance of nature. Symp. Zool. Soc. London, 42:183-193. Gunnarsson, B. 1983. Winter mortality of spruce- living spiders: effect of spider interactions and bird predation. Oikos, 40:226-233. Hassell, M. P. & R. M. May. 1974. Aggregation of predators and insect parasites and its effect on sta- bility. J. Anim. EcoL, 43:567-594. Hurlbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the de- sign of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr., 54:187-21 1. Kobayashi, S. 1975. The effect of release on the spider population in a paddy field. Appl. Ent. Zool., 10:268-274. Leborgne R. & A. Pasquet. 1987a. Influence of con- specific silk-structures on the choice of a web-site by the spider Zygiella x-notata (Clerck). Revue Ar- achnol., 7:85-90. Leborgne R. & A. Pasquet. 1987b. Influences of ag- gregative behavior on space occupation in the spider Zygiella x-notata (Clerck). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 20:203-208. Levi, H. W. 1974. The orb-weaver genus Zygiella (Araneae: Araneidae). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 146: 267-290. Pacala, S. & J. Roughgarden. 1984. Control of ar- thropod abundance by Anolis lizards on St. Eusta- tius (Neth. Antilles). Oecologia, 64:160-162. Polls, G. A. & S. J. McCormick. 1986. Scorpions, spiders and solpugids: predation and competition among distantly related taxa. Oecologia, 71:111- 116. Polls, G. A., C. A. Myers & R. D. Holt. 1989. The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: po- tential competitors that eat each other. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 20:297-330. 188 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Riechert, S. E. 1981. The consequences of being ter- ritorial: spiders, a case study. American Nat., 1 17: 871-892. Riechert, S. E. & R. G. Gillespie. 1 986. Habitat choice and utilization in web-building spiders. Pp. 23-48, In Spiders: Webs, Behavior, and Evolution. (W. A. Shear, ed.) Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Califor- nia. Riechert, S. E. & T. Lockley. 1984. Spiders as bio- logical control agents. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 29: 299-320. Riechert, S. E. & C. R. Tracy. 1975. Thermal balance and prey availability: bases for a model relating web- site characteristics to spider reproductive success. Ecology, 56:265-284. Rypstra, A. L. 1983. The importance of food and space in limiting web-spider densities: a test using field enclosures. Oecologia, 59:312-316. Rypstra, A. L. 1986. High prey abundance and a re- duction in cannibalism: the first step to sociality in spiders (Arachnida). J. Arachnol., 14:193-200. Spiller, D. A. 1984. Competition between two spider species: experimental field study. Ecology, 65:909- 919. Spiller, D. A. & T. W. Schoener. 1988. An experi- mental study of the effect of lizards on web-spider communities. Ecol. Monogr., 58:57-77. Spiller, D. A. & T. W. Schoener. 1990. Lizards reduce food consumption by spiders: mechanisms and con- sequences. Oecologia, 83:150-161. Wingerden, W. K. R. E. van. 1978. Population dy- namics of Erigone arctica (White) (Araneae, Liny- phiidae) 11. Symp. Zool. Soc. London, 42:195-202. Wise, D. H. 1975. Food limitation of the spider L/n- yphia marginata: experimental field studies. Ecol- ogy, 56:637-646. Wise, D. H. 1979. Effects of experimental increase in prey abundance upon female reproductive rates of two orb-weaving spider species. Oecologia, 41: 289-300. Wise, D. H. 1982. Predation by a commensal spider, Argyrodes trigonum, upon its host: an experimental study. J. Arachnol., 10:1 1 1-1 16. Wise, D. H. 1992. Spiders in Ecological Webs. Cam- bridge Univ. Press. Cambridge, UK. Manuscript received 8 June 1992, revised 23 October 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:189-199 A NEW SPECIES OF NORTH AMERICAN TARANTULA, APHONOPELMA PALOMA (ARANEAE, MYGALOMORPHAE, THERAPHOSIDAE) Thomas R. Prentice: Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA ABSTRACT. Aphonopelma paloma new species, is distinguished from all other North American tarantulas by its unusually small size and presence of setae partially or completely dividing the scopula of tarsus IV in both sexes. Both sexes also are characterized by a general reduction of the scopula on metatarsus IV. Males are characterized by a swollen third femur. In 1939 and 1940 R. V. Chamberlin and W. Ivie described almost all of the currently recog- nized North American theraphosid spiders. De- spite the acknowledged significance of their work, it is difficult to apply Chamberlin’s keys with much success even in dealing with specimens from type localities, primarily because their small sample sizes did not allow variational assess- ment. Eleven of these species descriptions were based on single males, five on single females, and three on two males each (Chamberlin & Ivie 1 939; Chamberlin 1 940). By increasing the sample size and working with both sexes, I describe here a new species of tarantula, Aphonopelma paloma, based on characters that have been selected after evaluating variation. Because of deficiencies in variational data the values of characters such as spination, meristic and morphometric ranges, and various ratios as taxonomic tools have not been assessed adequately. Therefore, specific ratios and morphometric comparisons as well as tables showing spination patterns and leg and palp seg- ment lengths and ranges are provided. These data should be useful in future taxonomic studies. A brief account of the natural history of A. paloma is included. METHODS Measurements were made using an American Optical 570 stereoscope equipped with an eye- piece micrometer accurate to 0.1 mm. Leg and pedipalp measurements were made on the side appearing most normal (e.g., not in the process of regeneration). Trochanters and coxae mea- surements were performed from ventral aspect, other leg and pedipalp segments from dorsal as- pect (Coyle 1971). Carapace length was taken with anterior and posterior edges in the same plane. All ink drawings except femora were aided by a camera lucida. Palpal bulb and seminal re- ceptacles were cleared in 10% NaOH (for 12 hr. at 50 °C.) prior to illustration. Scanning electron micrographs were taken with a JEOL JSM C35. Abbreviations for eyes are standard for Araneae. For leg spination, abbreviations are as follows: a = apical, b = basal, d = dorsal, e = preapical, L = left, m = medial, p = prolateral direction, r = retrolateral direction, R = right, usu. = usually, V = ventral, var. = variable, 0.33, 0.50, etc. = approximate fraction of the total segment length a spine is from the proximal end. Color refer- ences are from the color charts in the Munsell Book of Color and refer to color of live specimens under natural light conditions. Aphonopelma paloma, new species Figs. 1-12 Types.— -Holotype male, allotype female from Pinal County, Arizona, 3 mi. NE exit 151 off I- 8, 17-18 November 1989. Paratype males: 15 November 1986 - 1, 18-19 November 1989 - 2, 1 7 November 1 990 - 2; Paratype females: 1 8 Nov. 1989 - 2. Holotype and allotype deposited in the American Museum of Natural History. Etymology.— The specific epithet is from the Spanish word paloma (dove) which was used in the plural to describe a vast plain in the south- western desert of Arizona - Palomas Plain - where there is an abundance of these tiny tarantulas. Diagnosis.— differs from other North American theraphosid spiders by the presence of setae partially or completely dividing tarsus IV scopula and, to a lesser extent, tarsus III scopula (Figs. 1-3). Additional characters that further dif- 189 190 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY ferentiate A. paloma from other small species are its unusually small size, reduced metatarsal sco- pulation, and swollen third femora of males. Of the four small species that may overlap A. pal- oma in size {Chaunopelma radinum Chamberlin 1940; A. marxi Simon 1891 (Bonnet 1939); A. phasmus ChamberYm 1940; and A. ingrami Jung 1975 (Jung 1975; invalid name from unpub- lished thesis, types deposited under that name in the American Museum of Natural History)), only A. ingrami (name used for reference only) males have been found to do so but lack swollen third femora. Males from the remaining three species also lack swollen femora. All genera = Rhechostica Simon 1892 (Raven \ 9S5) = Aphon- opelma Pocock 1901 (Bull. Zool. Nomen. 48 (2) June 1991, Opinion 1637). Description. — Male: Holotype male. Length 14.5 mm. Carapace length 5.7 mm, carapace width 5.1 mm carapace width/carapace length 0.89. Tibia I/metatarsus I, 1.09. Leg span 47 mm. Entire tarantula black except silvery reflec- tion from black carapace hairs, grayish silver chelicerae, and interspersed long straw-colored abdominal setae. Ventral aspect also black ex- cept orange color of labium and anterior most portions of maxillae. Leg and palp segment lengths are in Table 1. Third femur noticeably swollen (Figs. 4-6), width, viewed from above, 1.7 mm, femora I and IV at widest point 1.1 mm. Lower process of tibial spur with one me- gaspine, long upper process with two shorter me- gaspines (Fig. 7). Chelicerae clothed in pale grayish-silver pu- bescence, longer silverish setae interspersed on dorsal surfaces. Cheliceral width 2.7 mm. Chel- iceral width/carapace width, 0.53. Promargins of each fang furrow with eight macro teeth. Carapace clothed with medium long dense black hairs (Munsell, 5Y 2/1), not closely ap- pressed. Thoracic groove a transverse pit. Ce- phalic region not rising abruptly from thoracic region, but in gradual arch. Extreme posterio- dorsal surface with scattered medium length bris- tles, shorter bristles just anteriad. Ocular area compact and elevated, turret com- paratively low. Anterior eye row slightly pro- curved; AME round, diameter 0.3 mm, separat- ed from each other by their diameter; ALE oval, length 0.8 X AME diameter; AME-ALE O.lx AME diameter. Posterior eye row nearly straight, at most slightly procurved; PME rounded, 0.7 x AME diameter, separated from each other by Figures 1-3.— T. paloma, new species. Scanning electron micrographs showing setae (arrows) dividing scopula on right tarsi, ventral: 1, paratype male, tarsus III (top), tarsus IV (bottom), x 24; 2, center section of tarsus IV in Fig. 1, x200; 3, paratype female, tarsus III (top), tarsus IV (bottom), x 36. 1.5 X AME diameter; PLE rounded, 0.7 x AME diameter; PME-PLE nearly contiguous; ALE-PLE 0.4 X AME diameter; AME-PME 0. 1 x AME di- ameter; median ocular quadrangle wider poste- riorly. Abdomen with short black (Munsell, N 1/) PRENTICE-NEW SPECIES OF APHONOPELMA 191 Figures 4-6.—Aphonopelma paloma, new species. Right femora of holotype male showing relative widths, dorsal: 4, femur IV; 5, femur I; 6, femur III. pubescence, long dark brown setae with straw- colored apices (Munsell, 5 YR 7/10, 10 YR 8/ 6) and longer attenuated setae, bases dark brown, distal halves straw-colored (Munsell, 10 YR 8/ 6) copiously interspersed. Longest setae less dense on venter than dorsum. Circular patch of black type I (Cooke et al. 1972) urticating hairs (Fig. 8) covering posteriodorsai % of abdomen. Legs black and hirsute; black pubescence in addition to medium long dark brown to black setae with straw-colored apices, medium density, and very long straw-colored setae with dark brown bases, low density. All tarsi fully scopulate with setae dividing tarsus IV scopula on proxi- mal 0.60. Extent of metatarsal scopula: meta- tarsus 1, 0.67; metatarsus II, 0.50; metatarsus III, 192 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 1 .—Aphonopelma paloma, new species. Left tibia I of holotype male showing general shape of spur processes and megaspine location, prolateral aspect; mgs = megaspine. distal 0.25 divided by setae; metatarsus IV, distal 0.17, divided by setae. Spination: leg I, metatarsus ld(p0.33) 2v(lap lam), tibia 2d(lp0.33 lpO.67) L4v(lrb lrO.50 2re) R5v(lrb 2r0.50 2re), femur Id(pe); leg II, metatarsus ld(p0.40) 4v(lap lam lar lrO.50), tibia 2d(lp0.33 lpO.67) L4v(lpe Ire lrO.50 Irb) R5v(lpe Ire irO.50 2rb), femur Id(pe); leg III, metatarsus 4d(lpe Ire lp0.60 lr0.60) R5v(lap 2ar lmO.50 lpO.50) L7v(lap lam. 2ar 2p0.50 lrO.50), tibia 4d(lp0.33 lrO.33 lpO.75 lrO.75) R4v(2pe lpO.50 lmO.50) L5v(2pe Ire lpO.50 lmO.50); leg IV, metatarsus 4d(lpe Ire lpO.50 lrO.50) 9v(5a 2r0.40-0.75 lpO.50 lmO.50), tibia R3d(lp0.25 lrO.25 lrO.75) L3d(lp0.25 lrO.25 lpO.75); palp, tibia 2v(lp0.50 lrO.50), femur Id(pe). Sternum widest between bases of second and third coxae, sigilla at margins of sternum op- posite coxae I, II and III, posterior sigillum larg- est. 37 cuspules on proximoventral surface of right maxilla, 39 on left. 40 labial cuspules. Table l.~ Aphonopelma paloma, holotype male: leg and pedipalp length (mm). Leg I II III IV Palp Coxa 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.9 Trochanter 1.3 1.2 I.O 1.1 1.2 Femur 6.1 5.5 5.0 5.8 3.6 Patella 2.7 2.4 2.1 2.4 1.8 Tibia 4.8 4.0 3.4 4.7 3.4 Metatarsus 4.4 4.4 4.7 6.0 Tarsus 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.0 1.0 Total leg length 24.3 22.2 20.7 24.9 12.9 Female: Allotype female. Length 16.2 mm. Carapace length 5.2 mm, carapace width 4.2 mm, carapace width/carapace length 0.81. Tibia 1/ metatarsus I, 1.17. Leg span 33 mm. Female gray; legs and carapace bronze-gray (Munsell, 10 YR 4/2) and abdomen black-gray (Munsell, 10 YR 3/1). Ventral aspect also gray except orange- brown color of labium and anterior halves of maxillae. Third femur not swollen as in male. Leg and palp segment lengths in Table 2. Cheiicerae clothed in grayish pubescence with long silverish setae as in holotype; cheliceral width 3.1 mm. Cheliceral width/carapace width, 0.74. Promargin of right fang furrow with eight ma- croteeth, left fang furrow with seven macroteeth. Carapace clothed in moderately short, dense bronze-gray hairs more closely appressed than in male. Numerous black attenuated setae, api- cally straw-colored, interspersed. Thoracic groove transverse, slightly procurved. Cephalic region rising abruptly from thoracic region, in profile steeper and higher than in male. Eye arrangement similar to holotype; AME diameter slightly great- Figure Aphonopelma paloma, new species. Type I urticating hair, Scanning electron micrograph, x780. PRENTICE- NEW SPECIES OF APHONOPELMA 193 Table 2.—Aphonopelmapaloma, allotype female: leg and pedipalp length (mm). Leg I II III IV Palp Coxa 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.7 1.9 Trochanter 1.1 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 Femur 3.9 3.4 3.0 4.0 3.0 Patella 2.2 1.9 1.8 2.0 1.6 Tibia 2.8 2.3 1.9 3.1 2.2 Metatarsus 2.4 2.2 2.4 3.6 Tarsus 1.8 1.6 1.6 2.0 1.9 Total leg length 16.2 13.9 12.9 17.5 11.7 er than 0.2 mm, separated from each other by 0.7 X AME diameter; ALE round (appear ovoid when viewed from above), slightly smaller than AME; AME-ALE 0.2 x AME diameter; PME round, diameter somewhat greater than 0. 1 mm, separated from each other by 1.8 x AME di- ameter; PLE somewhat ovoid, length 0.8 x AME diameter; PME-PLE, ALE-PLE, AME-PME as in holotype. Abdomen clothed in short dark gray pubes- cence. Color of medium long and longest setae as in holotype. Medium long setae copiously in- terspersed, longest setae sparse, confined mostly within circular patch of black urticating hairs on posterior % of abdomen. Legs covered with bronzish-gray pubescence in addition to short and medium length black- based straw-gray setae. Longest setae as in ho- lotype but less dense. All tarsi fully scopulate, setae dividing tarsus IV proximal 0.88, tarsus III proximal 0.33. Extent of metatarsal scopula: metatarsus I, 0.67; metatarsus II, 0.50; metatar- sus III distal 0.33, divided by setae; metatarsus IV, few scattered scopula hairs on distal end. Spination: Leg I, metatarsus !v(am), tibia lv(p0.40), femur Id(pe); leg II, metatarsus ld(p0.50)4v(lap lam lar lr0.40), tibia ld(p0.50) Rlv(r0.50) L(0); leg III, metatarsus 4d(lpe Ire lpO.50 lrO.50) R6v(lap lam 2ar lpO.50 lrO.67) L7v(2ap lam 2ar lpO.67 lmO.67), tibia 2d(ip0.50 IrO.50) R3v(lpe lp0.60 lm0.60) L2v(lpe lp0.60); leg IV, metatarsus 4d(lpe Ire lpO.50 lrO.50) R6v(lap lam lar lpO.50 lmO.75 lrO.50) L8v(lap lam 2ar lpO.67 lpO.88 lmO.67 lrO.88); palp, tibia 3v(2pe Ire), femur Id (pe). Widest point of sternum and position of sigilla as in holotype. 43 maxillary cuspules on proxi- moventral surface of right maxilla, 48 on left. 36 labial cuspules. Variation.— No evidence has been found to correlate intraspecific variation with the geo- graphical distribution of A. paloma. Allometric and other morphometric variations most likely reflect phenotypic plasticity. However, because of their possible value in species designation, specific variational ranges and ratios are included in this section. Males: 10 (nine with leg measurements in- cluding holotype). Overall length 9.9-14.1 mm. Carapace length 4. 2-6. 2 mm, width 3.6-5. 5 mm. Carapace width/carapace length 0.85-0.95, mean 0.89. Cheliceral width/carapace width 0.49-0.59, mean 0.54. Eight cheliceral macroteeth most common (7, 7 in one individual, 9, 8 in another, and 7, 8 in a third). Tibia I, in all specimens, longer than metatarsus I; tibia I/metatarsus I, 1.04-1.11, mean, 1.08. Metatarsus IV/carapace length >1 as in holotype. Leg and palp segment length ranges are in Table 3. Femur III 1.36- 1 .58 X width of femora I and IV. Femur I equal to or slightly longer than femur IV. Variation in leg and palpal spination is recorded in Table 4 showing approximate position and percent oc- currence of each spine. Relatively little variation was found in the palpal bulb. Interspecific dif- ferences in bulb morphology have proven to be of some value in distinguishing theraphosid spe- Table 3.—Aphonopelma paloma, 9 males, holotype: range of leg and pedipalp segment lengths (mm). For example, smallest specimen = 1.7 mm, largest specimen = 2.4 mm. Leg I II III IV Palp Coxa 1. 7-2.4 1.5-2. 1 1. 3-1.9 1. 4-2.2 1.4-2. 1 Trochanter 0.9-1. 3 0.8-1. 2 0.8-1. 1 0.8-1. 3 0.9-1. 4 Femur 4.4-6.3 4.0-5. 8 3.6-5.2 4.4-6. 1 2.7-3. 7 Patella 2.0-2.7 L7-2.4 1. 6-2.3 1. 7-2.4 1.4-1. 9 Tibia 3. 5-4.8 2.9-4.2 2.5-3. 5 3.6-5.0 2.6-3. 3 Metatarsus 3. 2^.6 3. 1-4.6 3.3-5.0 4.4-6.5 Tarsus 1. 8-2.7 1.9-2. 7 1. 9-2.7 2.2-3.2 1.0-1. 2 194 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 4.—Aphonopelma paloma, male (9 males, holotype) spination. Approximate position and percent occurrence of each leg and palpal spine. Spination abbreviations are defined in the Methods section of text. Dorsal (d) refers to upper half, ventral (v) to lower half of segment. An asterisk (*) indicates present on at least one of segment pair in all specimens; two asterisks (**) indicate present on at least one of segment pair except in the smallest specimen. 100-80% 79-60% <60% d-Me-I v-Me-I l-am(lOO) l-pl/3-l/2(69) l-ap(44) l-ar(6) l-pl/4-l/2(15) d-Ti-I l-p2/3(100) l-pl/3(89)** v-Ti-I l-er(lOO) 2nd-er(67) at least on 1 2nd-er(56) l-l/2(m or p)(100) of leg pr. l-b(p or m)(56) 2nd-v p 1/2(11) 2nd-bp(22) 3rd-b(p or m)(l 1) d-Fe-I l-ep(lOO) d-Me-lI l-pl/2(83)** v-Me-lI 3-a(lp Im lr)(94)* 4th-a(22) l-l/2(r or m)(100) l-additional(17) d-Ti-Il l-p2/3(94)* l-pl/3(83)* l-ep(ll) v-Ti-II 2-e(lp lr)(94)* 2nd-ep(17) l-r2/5-2/3(100) 2nd-er(6) l-em(l 1) l-br(5) 1-m 1/2(28) l-var.(38) d-Fe-II d-Me-lII 2-e(lp lr)(100) 2-l/2(lp lr)(83)* l-ep(61) v-Me-IlI 4-a(lp Im 2r)(89)* 5th-a(25) 2-l/2(lp Im or r)(94)* 3rd-v(17) d-Ti-III 2-2/3(lp lrusu.)(78)** l-pl/3(56) l-rl/3(33) v-Ti-III l-ep(94)* l-er(67)** l-pl/2(78) l-l/2(r or m)(72) 2nd-ep(28) d-Me-IV 2-e(lp lr)(83)** l-rl/2(83)* 1-p 1/2(72) v-Me-lV 4-a(lp Im 2r)(100) 5th-a(r)(78) 6th-a(ll) 3-v(lp Ir usu.)(100) 4th-v(78)** 7th-a(ll) 5th-v(33) d-Ti-IV l-r2/3(89)* l-r3/5(33) l-pl/3(33) l-epdl) l-p3/5(6) v-Ti-IV l-ep{100) 1-p 1/2(27) l-er(50) 2nd- 1 /2m usu.(61) 2nd-ep(44) d-Ti-Palp l-p3/5(33) l-ep(17) v-Ti-Palp l-pl/2(61) 1-r 1/2(40) l-var.(l 1) d-Pt-Palp I-P(ll) d-Fe-Palp l-ep(56) PRENTICE-NEW SPECIES OF APHONOPELMA 195 0.5 mm Figure 9 .—Aphonopelma paloma, new species. Left palpal tarsus of paratype male showing cymbium, bulb, and convolution of the receptaculum seminus, ventral aspect, ad = apical division of buib; bd = basal divi- sion; cy = cymbium; md = middle division; rs = re- ceptaculum seminus. cies. Apical and middle divisions of A. paloma bulb subequal, basal % of apical division tapering rapidly, distal third uniformly narrow (Fig. 9). Extent of scopula; metatarsus 1, 0.50-0.88; meta- tarsal II, 0.40-0.60; metatarsus III, 0.20-0.40; metatarsus IV, 0.20 to few scattered hairs. Tarsus IV scopula divided by stout setae often forming a band, proximal 0.50 to entire; tarsus III scopula divided by weaker setae, proximal 0.0-0.88; metatarsus III and IV divided by setae, meta- tarsus III sometimes by scattered setae. 30-60 maxillary cuspules per maxilla, 28-57 labial cus- pules. Females: 1 1 (including allotype). Overall length ranging from 1 2.2-1 9.0 mm averaging 1 5.0 mm. Little color variation in newly molted fe- males. Faded individuals lighter gray-brown or gray-bronze. Carapace length ranging 4.3-6. 1 mm, width 3. 6-5.0 mm, carapace width/cara- pace length 0.8 1-0.84, mean 0.82. Carapace width greater than length of femur I and IV. Cheliceral width/carapace width 0.67-0.76, mean 0.70. Eight cheliceral macro teeth most common (9, 8 in one individual, 8, 7 in another, 10, 9 in a third). Tibia I, as in males, longer than metatar- sus I; tibia 1/metatarsus I 1.19-1.29, mean 1.22. Metatarsus IV shorter than both carapace length and width. Leg and pedipalp segment length ranges are in Table 5. Femur III not sv/ollen as in male. Femur I equal to or shorter than femur IV. Variation in leg and palp spination is re- corded in Table 6 showing approximate position and percent occurrence of each spine. Only two forms of seminal receptacle shape have been found (Fig. 10, 1 1), both in paratypes. The scler- otized nature of each form suggests that variation may result from phenotypic plasticity. Extent of metatarsal scopula: metatarsus I, 0.67-full; metatarsus II, 0.50-0.60; metatarsus III, 0.25- 0.40; metatarsus IV, 0-0.17. Tarsus IV scopula divided by stout setae often forming a setal band, tarsus III proximal 0.40-0.67 divided by weaker setae except undivided in one specimen. Meta- tarsus III and IV divided by setae. 38-70 max- illary cuspules per maxilla, 3 5-5 5 labia! cuspules. Distribution. — Habitable terrain is in the SW Arizona desert from 680-1950 ft. elevation, on relatively flat and sandy bajadas and plains con- ducive to burrowing. Major vegetation types in- clude creosote bush, saguaro cactus, ocotillo. Table 5.— Aphonopelma paloma, 10 females, allotype: range of leg and pedipalp segment lengths (mm). For example, smallest specimen— 1.6 mm, largest specimen— 2.3 mm. Leg I II III IV Palp Coxa 1. 6-2.3 1. 4-2.0 1.2-1. 8 1. 4-2.0 1. 6-2.2 Trochanter 0.9-L2 0.8-1. 0 0.7-0.9 0.8-1. i 0.9-1. 1 Femur 3.1-4.6 2.7-^.0 2.5-3.6 3.3-4.8 2.5-3.6 Patella 1.8-2. 5 1. 5-2.3 L4-2.0 1. 7-2.3 1.4-1.9 Tibia 2.3-3.4 1. 9-2.7 1.5-2. 3 2.4-3. 5 1. 7-2.5 Metatarsus 1. 9-2.8 1. 8-2.7 1. 9-3.0 2.8-M.2 Tarsus 1. 3-2.2 1.3-2. 1 1.3-2. 1 1. 7-2.4 1. 6-2.3 196 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 6.—Aphonopelma paioma, female (10 females, allotype) spination. Approximate position and percent occurrence of each leg and palpal spine. Spination abbreviations are defined in the Methods section of text. Dorsal (d) refers to upper half, ventral (v) to lower half of segment. An asterisk (*) indicates present on at least one of segment pair in all specimens; two asterisks (**) indicate present on at least one of segment pair except in one specimen. 100-80% 79-60% <60% v-Me-I l-am(lOO) l-ap(59} 1-61/3(5) d-Ti-I 1 -bp 1/4(5) v-Ti-I l-l/2(r or m)(27) l-er(18) d-Fe-I l-ep(18) d-Me-II i-p 1/2(36) v-Me-II 3-a(lp Im lr)(86)* l-rl/3-l/2(86)* 2nd-vl/3-l/2(14) d-Ti-II i-pl/2(45) v-Ti-II d-Me-III 2-e(lp lr)(100) 2-l/2(lp lr)(95)* !-rl/2(59) v-Me-III 4-a(lp Im 2r)(95)* 2-l/2(lp Ir or m)(86)* 5th-a(p)(5) d-Ti-III l-r2/5-3/5(86)* l-p2/5-3/5(45) l.r3/4-7/8(5) v-Ti-III l-ep(82) 2nd-ep(14) 1-1/2(45) 2nd- 1/2(1 4) d-Me-IV 2-e(lp lr)(82) l-rl/2(86)** l-pl/2(55) v-Me-IV 4-a(lp Im 2r)(95)* 3rd-v(var.)(68) 5th-a(36) 2-l/2(ip Iror m){95)* 6th-a(5) 4th-v(var.)(27) d-Ti-IV l-rl/2-7/8(82)** l-r2/5(27) v-Ti-IV l-ep(73) 2nd-e(p usu.)(32) 1-1/2(45) 4th-v(var.)(5) d-Ti-Palp l-p(14) v-Ti-Palp 3-e(lr 2p usu.)(95)* l-rl/2(36) l-pl/2(i8) d-Fe-Palp l-ep(73) cholla (Pinal and Pima Co.), acacia, palo verde, and bur sage (Ambrosia). Natural history.— ^4. paioma appears to have a very limited activity cycle. Open burrows have been observed only between the last week of Oc- tober and mid-December. After unplugging bur- row entrances the small tarantulas deposit silk- bound earth and accumulated debris from bur- rows either adjacent to or removed from the en- trances by up to 15 cm. The resulting crescent- shaped mounds are typical of the species and have not been observed in other U.S. thera- phosid species (Fig. 12). The maximum open burrow density corresponds to the height of the breeding season in mid-November. After the first heavy winter rains, often in December, the cres- cent mounds are flattened and burrows cannot be found. Entrance hole diameters for mature females range from 5-10 mm. Smaller diameter burrows have been excavated and contained immature individuals. Burrow mouths are often lined with a thin layer of silk extending for up to a few mm onto and below the ground surface in contrast to most U.S. theraphosids which generally have a thicker layer extending several mm in either di- rection. Burrow depths range from 30-62 cm, but most often are about 50-54 cm, with very few less than 46 cm. Burrows are primarily ver- tical with little horizontal deviation. Toward the PRENTICE -NEW SPECIES OF APHONOPELMA 197 Figures 10, 1 \ .—Aphonopelma paloma, new species. Spermathecae of two paratype females illustrating two forms found; 10, bulbs separated by ~ 0.5 mm, egg canal closed; 1 1, bulbs separated by ~ 0.75 mm, egg canal open. Anterior direction indicated by arrow. bottom they widen into horizontal or oblique terminal chambers. One or two additional side chambers are often found along the burrow, gen- erally at junctions where it makes a brief hori- zontal run or otherwise changes direction. Most activity is nocturnal. Mature females and immatures can be observed in the evening hours either carrying excavated materials with their chelicerae and pedipalps or waiting near or just inside their burrows for passing prey. Females have not been observed more than 20 cm from the burrows. Prey consists of beetles (many in the Tenebrionidae), harvester ants (Myrmicin- ae), and arachnids, including other spiders and small scorpions. Remains of these have been found in excavated mounds and in the terminal chambers. In the late fall breeding season, males can be found wandering by day in search of female bur- rows, especially from late morning until early afternoon. No active males have been found after dark. Mating is diurnal and occurs outside the burrow. Courtship and mating behavior in A. paloma is typical of the genus (pers. obs.). Upon finding a female burrow, the male generally taps the ground near the burrow entrance with his first pair of legs, often quite forcefully. Gentle substratum drumming with the palps commonly accompanies leg tapping, but the two behaviors are not simultaneous. The spider sporadically alternates leg tapping and palp drumming with a stridulating vibration in which his body moves in a rhythmic up and down fashion with femur III positioned almost vertically (stridulation mechanism has not been isolated). Each stridu- Figure 12.— Aphonopelma paloma, new species. Photograph of burrow entrance showing typical crescent- shaped excavation mound. 198 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY lating pulse is of short duration, often less than three s. The stridulating posture is also seen at various intervals during the course of the male’s wandering. In two large U.S. theraphosid species {A. reversum Chamberlin and A. eutylenum Chamberlin), vibrations from male stridulation can be detected by the females from at least 1.2 m through a combination of 1 2 cm earth, 1 6 mm Plexiglass, and approximately 2.4 m tubular stainless steel (pers. obs.). Females of these spe- cies responded by rapidly drumming their first two pairs of legs. This drumming behavior is also seen in A. paloma females in response to male stridulation. These behaviors suggest long dis- tance communication between male and female tarantulas. The male continues courtship behav- ior until the female emerges from the burrow and contact is made. After mating both spiders usu- ally run (female often walks) in opposite direc- tions, the female back into her burrow, the male several cm away. It is not known when the female constructs her cocoon and deposits eggs. Tarantulas of many other U.S. species lay eggs in spring or early sum- mer (Baerg 1958; Gertsch 1979). Mostd. paloma spiderlings have dispersed by September, and none can be found with females when burrows are unplugged in October or November. Four burrows excavated between 1-3 September 1991 contained young. Of the two burrows at the Pinal Co. site, one contained a female with five young, one of which had the shortest carapace length, 1.5 mm, the other contained one juvenile (no female present), had the longest carapace length, 2.1 mm, and was the largest (length 6.1) of all young found. Of the two remaining burrows at Sentinel (Maricopa Co.) site 1 contained a female with three young, the other contained one young (no female present). All young appeared to be in their second or third instar. I assume that more than five young emerge from most egg sacs since dissected females have been found with approx- imately 40-100 developing eggs but evidence of when and how young dispersed has not been found. Populations of these tarantulas are often subdivided into loose aggregations where burrow densities have been observed as high as 14 per 10.7 m\ One species of pompilid wasp was reared from a parasitized A. paloma female (Sentinel, Mari- copa Co. site) and was identified as Hemipepsis ustulata ustulata Dahlbom. No other predators are known. DISCUSSION This study found size, general reduction of metatarsal scopula, division of tarsal scopula by setae, and swollen third femora of males to be reliable characters in distinguishing A. paloma from other recognized North American Aphon- opelma. Overlap in size between valid Aphono- pelma species and A. paloma has not been seen. However, Jung (1975) described a small species within which overlap with the largest A. paloma males occurred. Metatarsal scopula in A. paloma is more reduced than in the other species. Di- vision of tarsal scopula by setae (either partially or wholly), in itself, separates this new species from all other Aphonopelma (Chamberlin 1940; Raven 1985). The swollen third femur of the male is also unique in this genus. Based on the work presented here, it appears that many of the characters used by Chamberlin to distinguish theraphosid species may be highly variable within a species. Nine of the 24 couplets in his male Aphonopelma key are based on rel- ative number and position of leg and palpal spines. For example, Delopelma and Gosipelma subgenera were differentiated on the basis of two and four submedian spines, respectively, on the prolateral face of the palpal tibia. I have found that d. paloma type males (also with tibia I longer than metatarsus I) have 0, 1, or 2 submedial prolateral spines. Furthermore, Delopelma was divided into two sets of species by the number of ventral spine levels between the base and spur of tibia I, two species with 1 or 2 spine levels on tibia I and 1-2 ventral spines on the palpal tibia, and two species with 4 or 5 spine levels on tibia I and no ventral spines on the palpal tibia. A. paloma males have 1, 2, or 3 levels of spines on tibia I and 0, 1 , or 2 ventral spines on the palpal tibia. Similarly, males of an undescribed Cali- fornia species (all specimens from a single lo- cation) have 2-4 submedial prolateral spines, 1- 4 ventral spines on the palpal tibia, and 2-4 levels of ventral spines on tibia I. All of these examples suggest that spination is more variable within species than previously thought. Reliable spi- nation patterns may emerge as additional vari- ational data accumulate for each species. Chamberlin used relative lengths of tibia and metatarsus I to differentiate Aphonopelma from Gosipelma and Delopelma species. Although this character appears to be valuable in distinguishing between some morphologically similar allopath- ic species or between sympatric species within PRENTICE -NEW SPECIES OF APHONOPELMA 199 geographical isolates, ratio reversals of tibia 1/ metatarrsus I may represent opposite ends of morphoclines within extensive continuous pop- ulations. Raven (1985) maintained that Dugesiella shares with Rhechostica = Aphonopelma (ICZN, Opinion 1637) the thomlike setae on the pro- lateral coxae and that no other known characters merited its continued separation from Aphono- pelma. Jung (1975) did not feel that prolateral coxa I setation warranted generic or subgeneric designation because he found a gradual reduction of swollen setal bases from Dugesiella to Chaun- opelma. He found that generic designations of North American tarantulas were based on char- acters that are shared in different degrees by all the genera. In spite of the uniqueness of A. pal- oma, there is little use in considering it or any other North American theraphosid as other than Aphonopelma until variational ranges have been determined for all proposed species. Only by ex- amining sufficient numbers of each of these spe- cies will their variational ranges become com- parable and the taxonomic significances of these various characters be realized. Material examined.— The type specimens and the following: USA: Arizona; Maricopa Co., 2 mi. N. Sen- tinel, 690 ft. elev., 1 8 November 1989, 1 female, 4 Jan. 1990, 1 female, 26 Oct. 1990, 2 males, 2 females, 10 Nov. 1990, 1 female; Rd. 355, 1 mi. S. Granite Reef Aqueduct, 1400 ft. elev., 10 Nov. 1990, 1 female, 11 Dec. 1990, 1 female; Pima Co., 3 miles E. Ajo, 1780 ft. elev., 18 Nov. 1989, 1 male; 0.1 mile N. boundary Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, 1950 ft. elev., 18 Nov. 1989, 1 male; 15 miles. S. Ajo, 1650 ft. elev., 30 March 1990, 1 female. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Special thanks are extended to Gordon Gordh and Michael Adams for providing encourage- ment and expertise in assisting me in the prep- aration of this description and to Wendell Icen- ogle for his time and effort in helping me to acquire the knowledge I have of the North Amer- ican tarantulas. My special thanks also to David Headrick and Mario Moratorio for their labo- ratory assistance, to Willis Gertsch and Vincent Roth for their on-going encouragement of my work on U.S. tarantulas, and to Frederick Coyle for his valuable comments in his review of this manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Baerg, W. 1958. The tarantula. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence. Bonnet, P. 1939. Bibliographia Araneorum. Vol. II, parts 1-5, Vol. III. Toulouse. Chamberlin, R. V. 1940. New American tarantulas of the Family Aviculariidae. Bull. Univ. Utah, Vol. 30, No. 13. Univ. of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. Chamberlin, R. V. & W. Ivie. 1939. New tarantulas from the southwestern states. Bull. Univ. Utah, Vol. 29, No. 11. University Press, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City. Cooke, J. A. L., V. D. Roth & F. A. Miller. 1972. The urticating hairs of theraphosid spiders. Amer- ican Mus. Nov., No. 2498. Coyle, F. A. 1971. Systematics and natural history of the mygalomorph spider genus Antrodiaetus and related genera (Araneae: Antrodiaetidae). Bull. Mus. Comp. ZooL, Vol. 141, No. 6. ICZN. 1991. Opinion 1637. Aphonopelma Pocock, 1901 (Arachnida, Araneae): gives precedence over Rhechostica Simon, 1892. Bull Zool. Nomen. 48. Gertsch, W.J. 1979. Mygalomorph spiders. Pp. 100- 1 26, In American Spiders, 2nd Edition. Van Nos- trand Reinhold Co., New York. Jung, A. K. S. 1975. Morphological relationships among five species of sympatric tarantulas (Ara- neae: Theraphosidae), with descriptions of four new species. Master’s Thesis, University of Florida. Munsell Color Company, Inc., 1958. Munsell Book of Color. Cabinet Edition. Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A. Raven, R. J. 1985. The spider infraorder Mygalo- morphae (Araneae): cladistics and systematics. Bull. American Mus. Nat. Hist., 182:1-175. Simon, E. 1891. Liste des esptees de la famille des Aviculariides qui habitent I’Amerique du nord. Act. Soc. Linn. Bord., 44:307-326. Manuscript received I January 1992, revised 7 July 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:200-206 SEX RATIO IN THE SOCIAL SPIDER DIAEA SOCIALIS (ARANEAE: THOMISIDAE) David M. Rowell: Division of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, GPO Box 4, Canberra City 2601 Australia Barbara York Main: Zoology Department, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009 Australia ABSTRACT. Sex ratio data from embryos and adults are compared in the social thomisid Diaea socialis. The relative proportions of males and females do not differ significantly between the two data sets, indicating that a sex ratio bias already exists at the time of fertilization. A statistical comparison with published data for the theridiid Anelosimus eximius shows a different ratio but similar pattern for the two types of data. A molecular procedure for determining whether the overproduction of females results from a bias in the sperm or differential success of sperm in fertilization is described. In those social spiders where the adult sex ratio is known, it is female-biased (Buskirk 1981; Voll- rath 1986). However, Fisher’s principle (Fisher 1930) predicts that selection will favor an equal parental investment in offspring of both sexes. It would follow, then, that any bias in sex ratio should result from forces acting after dispersal. On the basis of the correlation between sex ratio and social behavior it would seem reasonable to hypothesize that the two phenomena are in some way causally linked. Skewed sex ratios have sim- ilarly been reported in colonies of Diaea socialis Main, with an observed male:female ratio of 0.2126 (Main 1988). The life-history and behavior of D. socialis were described in Main (1988). Colonies are founded by individual gravid females which use silk to bind together eucalypt leaves to form a nest. The brood spiderlings remain with the mother after hatching, add leaves cooperatively to enlarge the nest, share prey, mature in the nest and mate with siblings. Generally, only mated females migrate from the nest, over the Septem- ber to November period. The sex ratios reported for this species (Main 1988) have been assessed on adult and preadult morphology only, and con- sequently the observed bias may reflect differ- ential life span or mortality between the sexes. Alternatively, it is possible that the sex ratio is skewed from birth as a result of meiotic drive or some other factor. To determine whether such processes are operating requires the ascertain- ment of gender as soon as possible after fertil- ization, and preferably before hatching. Using cytological techniques, Aviles and Maddison (1991) have demonstrated a primary female bias in embryos of the social species Anelosimus ex- imius Keyserling and A. domingo Levi (propor- tion of males = 0.08 and 0.09, respectively) which contrasts with a more even sex ratio for non- social species in the genus. In spiders it is relatively easy to determine the gender of embryos using cytological techniques because of their unusual sex determination mechanism. In 81% of the spider species that have been analyzed there are two sex chromo- somes involved in sex-determination (White 1973). Males possess one copy of each of these, while females cany' two copies of each (four in all). Consequently, females have two more chro- mosomes than males, and so can be distin- guished simply on the basis of chromosome number. This method of sex-determination is referred to as XjXjO, and it would appear to be the ancestral condition in spiders (White 1973). This system has been modified to X.XjXjO in the Australian huntsman spiders (Rowell 1985) and X1X2X3X4O in the sparassid Hetewpoda sik- kimensis (Datta & Chatterjee 1983). In the ma- jority of the Oxyopidae analyzed, there has been a reduction in sex chromosome number resulting in an XO system similar to that prevalent in the insects (Datta & Chatterjee 1983). Thus, among different species, females may possess one, two, three or four more chromosomes than males. Over 300 species of spider have been analyzed 200 ROWELL & MAIN-SEX RATIO IN A SOCIAL SPIDER 201 Figure 1.— Male meiosis in D. socialis (2N = 24). Note the presence of eleven bivalents plus two heter- omorphic X-chromosomes (arrow). cytologically, and the kind of sex-determination system described above is virtually universal. In only two cases, the sparassid Delena cancehdes Walckenaer and the salticid genus Pellenes Simon, do aberrant systems exist (Rowell 1990; Mad- dison 1982), both involving rearrangements be- tween the X-chromosomes and autosomes. These modified systems are very distinctive, however, and can easily be identified from male meiotic preparations. In this study, sex ratios of adult and subadult D. socialis are compared to embryonic sex ratios determined by cytological means, to ascertain whether the observed bias arises before hatching, or as a result of differential mortality of the sexes. In addition, the ratios observed are compared with those reported by Aviles and Maddison (1991) from cytological analysis and Aviles (1986) from morphology for the social species Anelo- simus eximius, to determine whether a particular primary sex ratio may exist in social spiders. METHODS All specimens, both eggs and males, used in the cytological analyses were collected by one of us (BYM) from sites in the vicinity of Torbay west of Albany, southwestern Western Australia. The sex ratio was also determined from adult and subadult spiders from colonies collected in the same areas by BYM (subsequently consid- ered by Main (1988)) and from Pemberton by T. A. Evans. In younger colonies at two sites a small proportion of juvenile individuals possessed no characters of either sex. No reliable morpholog- ical characters have been found for sexing youn- ger spiders, and the small size of D. socialis makes dissection of large numbers of individuals im- practical. However, the authors’ previous expe- rience with this species has shown that the rate of development within and between the sexes in a colony is concerted (but with males maturing before females). Hence swelling of the palp would have been apparent were these individuals male. Consequently, in colonies possessing a mixture of adults and juveniles, the juveniles were scored as females. The validity of this assumption was borne out in the statistical analysis, where it was shown that the sex ratios within these colonies were not statistically different from those of adult colonies. Colonies in which the majority of in- dividuals were juvenile were not included in the analysis, nor were degenerate colonies with less than five individuals, or those without represen- tatives of both sexes (two colonies qualified for the latter). Chromosome preparations were made from testes and embryos using the techniques de- scribed in Rowell (1985) which differs from that detailed by Aviles and Maddison (1991). Not every embryo yielded spreads which could be Table 1.— Heterogeneity and deviation from even sex ratio in embryonic data for D. socialis. * P < 0.01. Site Males Females Total Male proportion Coombes Rd, Torbay 5 13 18 0.28 Coombes/Harding Rds, Torbay 3 8 11 0.27 Coombes/Harding Rds, Torbay 4 12 16 0.25 Coombes/Harding Rds, Torbay 4 9 13 0.31 Total Deviation from 1:1 G = 12.08* 16 Heterogeneity G = 42 0.122 ns. 58 0.28 202 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 2 )> cue !! fO ta M u H70% of those reared on a polytypic diet survived to adulthood (a mortality rate of 28.5%). Owing to difficulty in observing female geni- talia on live specimens, precise data on age at sexual maturity were only available for L. helluo (Fig. 2). Distributions of maturation times were significantly different for the two diet treatments (Kolmogorov-Smimov test: = 0.37; P < 0.05). Spiders raised on a polytypic diet reached sexual maturity earlier than those raised on a monotypic diet; differences in age at maturity are significant (Mann- Whitney U-test: U, = 482; P < 0.05). The median age at maturity for poly- typic diet treatment individuals was estimated to be 337 days; for monotypic diet treatment individuals, 387 days (precise dates could not be determined in all cases, as spiders were moni- tored on a weekly basis). Body size parameters measured at maturity were significantly different between experimental treatments for one of the two species studied (Table I). For L. helluo, significant differences between treatments were seen in cephalothorax width (T = 2.02; P < 0.05), total leg length (T = 2.07; P < 0.05); and patella-tibia length (T = 2.58; F < 0.05), with spiders raised on polytypic diets larger in all measures. In contrast, for Ly- cosa sp., no significant differences in body size parameters v/ere seen (although lowered survival and consequent smaller sample sizes may have influenced this result). 210 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY DISCUSSION Results of this study provide strong support for earlier hypotheses regarding the importance of a mixed diet for lycosid spiders and other spider species (Peck & Whitcomb 1970; Green- stone 1979; Riechert & Harp 1987). It is im- portant to note that the monotypic diet used in this study was composed of a domesticated prey animal, which was itself reared under artificial conditions with an unknown diet. It is possible that the diet fed to crickets in culture may have lacked a nutrient requirement critical for spiders (although not for crickets), and an experimental study with a monotypic diet of field-collected crickets might have yielded a different result. Walcott (1963) reported that Achaearanea tepi- dariorum (Koch) had poor survivorship when fed mealworms whose diet was limited to stan- dard mealworm bran. However, when meal- worms were fed vitamin-enriched commercial bran cereals, spider survivorship was improved dramatically. This result may also explain why lycosids suffer high mortality when fed on a diet of Drosophila, an insect known to lack a require- ment for linoleic and linolenic acid in its diet (K. Redborg, pers. comm.). While these findings clearly suggest that rearing of spiders in the lab- oratory could be enhanced by providing a variety of prey species, it also raises questions about the role of dietary mixing in the field. The differences in survivorship, age at matu- ration, and size at maturity seen in this study between spiders fed on a polytypic versus a monotypic diet suggest that there are clear fitness consequences of dietary breadth. Differential mortality rates, with approximately 2. 3-2. 6 times greater mortality for spiders fed a monotypic diet, suggest that selection pressure for dietary mixing could be strong. Although in this study ail other factors were controlled, the lack of dietary mix- ing might affect spiders in the field in other ways as well. For example, if physical condition were affected by dietary breadth, differences in vul- nerability to predation and parasitism might re- sult. Moreover, earlier maturation and larger size at maturity might well confer other fitness ad- vantages on spiders with mixed diets (Uetz 1 992). It is well known that larger spiders are more likely to win contests over territory and or mates (Aus- tad 1983; Christenson 1984; Suter&Keiley 1984; Riechert 1 986; Uetz & Hodge 1 990). Spiders ma- turing early in the breeding season might have access to more potential mates, and have a longer time to feed before laying eggs. In addition, off- spring of spiders breeding earlier might have a competitive size advantage over other broods, and might even cannibalize them (Edgar 1969). This demonstration of differential mortality and other fitness-related consequences of diet provides strong support for the hypothesis that dietary mixing is adaptive in spiders (Greenstone 1979). While the proximate mechanisms by which spiders maintain a mixed diet remain un- clear, there is new evidence that foraging behav- iors affecting diet choice in spiders are geneti- cally-based (Hedrick & Riechert 1989; Riechert 1991), and therefore potentially subject to selec- tion. As spiders are considered important model organisms for research in ecology and behavioral genetics, as well as potential agents of agricultural pest management (Wise 1984; Riechert & Lock- ley 1984; Uetz 1992), further study of the adap- tive significance of diet in these animals deserves attention. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was supported in part by funding from the University of Cincinnati Research Council, the Department of Biological Sciences, and the Arachnological Research Fund. We ap- preciate the assistance of Sam Marshall, who col- lected the Florida specimens, and Allen Brady and Pat Miller, who kindly verified the species. We are also grateful to Cara Hardesty, Nilay Pa- tel, Michelle Gingery, Alan Hensley, and James McDonough for assistance in rearing spiders, and Dave Clark and Veronica Casebolt for various other assistance. Gail Stratton, A1 Cady, Jerry Rovner and Matt Greenstone provided insight- ful comments on the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Austad, S. N. 1983. A game theoretical interpretation of male combat in the bowl and doily spider (Fron- tinella pyramitela). Anim. Behav., 31:59-73. Belovsky, G. E. 1978. Diet optimization in a gen- eralist herbivore: the moose. Theor. Popul. Biol., 14:105-134. Christenson, T. E. 1984. Alternative reproductive tactics in spiders. American ZooL, 24:321-332. Eason, R. R. 1 969. Life history and behavior of Par- dosa lapidicina Emerton (Araneae: Lycosidae). J. Kansas EntomoL Soc., 42:339-360. Edgar, W. D. 1969. Prey and predators of the wolf spider Lycosa lugubris. J. Zool. London, 1 59:405- 411. Greenstone, M. H. 1978. The numerical response to prey availability of Pardosa rarnulosa (McCook) UETZ ET AL.- SURVIVORSHIP OF WOLF SPIDERS ON DIFFERENT DIETS 211 (Araneae: Lycosidae) and its relationship to the role of spiders in the balance of nature. Symp. Zool. Soc. London, 42:183-193. Greenstone, M. H. 1979. Spider behavior optimises dietary essential amino acid composition. Nature, 282:501-503. Hedrick, A. & S. E. Riechert. 1989. Genetically-based variation between two spider populations in for- aging behavior. Oecologia, 80:533-539. Miyashita, K. 1968. Growth and development of Ly- cos^ t-insignata Boes. et Str. (Araneae: Lycosidae) under different feeding conditions. Appl. Ent. Zool., 3: 81-88. Peck, W. B. & W. H. Whitcomb. 1970. Studies on the biology of a spider Chiracanthium indusum (Hentz). Agr. Exp. Sta. Div. Agr. Univ. Arkansas Bull, 753:1-76. Riechert, S. E. 1986. Spider fights: a test of evolu- tionary game theory. American Sci., 74:604-610. Riechert, S. E. 1991. Prey abundance vs. diet breadth in a spider test system. Evol. EcoL, 5:327-338. Riechert, S. E., & J. M. Harp. 1 987. Nutritional ecol- ogy of spiders. Pp. 645-672, In Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, and Spiders (F. Slansky & J. G. Rodriguez, eds.). John Wiley & Sons, New York Riechert, S. E. & T. Lockley. 1984. Spiders as bio- logical control agents. Ann. Rev. Entomoi., 29:299- 320. Riechert, S. E. & J. Luczak. 1982. Spider foraging: behavioral responses to prey. Pp. 353-384, In Spi- der Communication: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance (P. N. Witt & J. S. Rovner, eds.). Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Slansky, F. & J. G. Rodriguez. 1987. Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, and Spiders. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Suter, R. B. & M. Keiley. 1984. Agonistic interactions between male Frontinella pyramitela (Araneae: Lin- yphiidae). Behav. Ecol. SociobioL, 15:1-7. Uetz, G. W. 1990. Prey selection in web-building spiders and evolution of prey defenses. Pp. 93-128, In Insect Defenses: Adaptive Mechanisms and Strategies of Prey and Predators (D. L. Evans & J. O. Schmidt, eds.). State Univ. of New York Press, Albany. Uetz, G. W. 1992. Foraging strategies of spiders. Trends Ecol. Evol., 7:155-159. Uetz, G. W. & M. A. Hodge. 1990. Influence of hab- itat and prey availability on spatial organization and behavior of colonial web-building spiders. Nat. Geogr. Res., 6:22-40. Van Dyke, D. & D. C. Lowrie. 1975. Comparative life histories of the wolf spiders Pardosa ramulosa and P. sierra (Araneae: Lycosidae). Southwest Na- tur., 20:29-44. Walcott, C. 1963. The effect of the web on vibration sensitivity in the spider, Achaearanea tepidariorum (Koch). J. Exp. BioL, 40:595-61 1. Wise, D. H. 1984. The role of competition in spider communities: Insights from field experiments with a model organism. Pp. 42-54, In Ecological Com- munities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence (D. R. Strong, S. S. Simberloff, L. G. Abele, and A. Thistle, eds.). Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton. Manuscript received 8 June 1992, revised 16 August 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:212-216 ANTIPREDATOR BENEFITS OF SINGLE- AND MIXED-SPECIES GROUPING BY NEPHILA CLAVIPES (h.) (ARANEAE, TETRAGNATHIDAE) Margaret A. Hodge' and George W. Uetz: Dept, of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati; Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0006 USA ABSTRACT. The golden silk spider, Nephila clavipes (L.), is known to live both solitarily and in single-species aggregations. In Veracruz, Mexico, N. clavipes is also found in association with the colonial orbwsMev Metepeira incrassata F.O. Pickard-Cambridge (Araneae: Araneidae). This study compared the frequency of predation attempts on solitary, intraspecifically aggregated and colony associated N. clavipes. Solitary N. clavipes suffered greater relative predation than those in single-species groups or those associated with M. incrassata colonies. We also compared the distance at which the three categories of N. clavipes were able to detect and respond to a simulated predation attempt. Both intraspecifically grouped and colony associated N. clavipes had significantly greater response distances than did solitary individuals, indicating that they could respond to a predation threat sooner. These data support predictions that grouped spiders may benefit from lower predation and/or an early warning system. Although spiders, as predators, have been well studied, evidence for the types and especially the frequencies of predation on spiders is lacking. Predation rates on solitary spiders may be quite high (Askenmo et al. 1977; Gunnarsson 1983), especially in tropical areas (Rypstra 1984; Voll- rath 1985). There is evidence that spider webs are irritating to vertebrate predators such as birds (Horton 1980; Eisner & Nowicki 1983), and it has been suggested that the dense webbing of colonial spiders might act to deter predation (Lu- bin 1974; Robinson & Robinson 1976; Rypstra 1979). It has also been hypothesized that colonial spiders may benefit from an “early-warning sys- tem”, in which the intertwined webbing trans- mits alarm signals from other spiders or vibra- tions from predators, causing spiders to take evasive action (Lubin 1974; Rypstra 1979; Uetz 1985). To date, however, actual evidence for an- tipredator benefits in colonial spiders is limited (Spiller & Schoener 1989). There are several ways that animals in groups can avoid predation: shared vigilance and early warning signals may increase the chances of predator detection (Pulliam & Caraco 1984); re- duction of individual risk as a result of being one of many possible prey present (Hamilton 1971); 'Dept, of Biology, The College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio 44691 USA predator deterrence arising from collective mim- icry or aposematism (Morse 1980); group de- fense, such as mobbing. While the above ideas were developed with regard to single-species grouping, reduction of predation frequency has also been reported in a variety of mixed-species groups (reviewed in Morse 1977 and Barnard & Thompson 1985). However, it is also possible that individuals in mixed-species groups might experience a unique disadvantage with respect to predation if they are different in appearance from the majority of the group. There is evidence that odd group members are selectively preyed upon in heterospeciflc groups (Mueller 1975; Milinski 1977; Ohguchi 1978). The goal of this study was to determine wheth- er predator avoidance benefits exist for spiders in heterospeciflc groups. Mixed-species associa- tions have been noted to occur between colonial web-building spiders and other spider species (Lubin 1974; Sabath et al.l974; Bradoo 1972, 1979; Rypstra 1979; Berry 1987; Lopez 1988; Hodge 1990). Spiders in the genus Nephila (Te- tragnathidae) often form intraspeciflc aggrega- tions (Shear 1970; Moore 1977; Farr 1977; Ryp- stra 1985; Higgins 1988). Other species of web- building spiders associate with Nephila groups (McCook 1890; Strusaker 1969; Yoshida 1988) and Nephila have been found in association with colonial orbwea vers (Jackson 1986; Hodge 1990). 212 HODGE & UETZ- ANTIPREDATOR BENEFITS OF GROUPING BY NEPHILA 213 Because they are found solitarily, in single-spe- cies and in mixed-species groups, Nephila are ideal for comparing of the costs and benefits of these three different living situations. METHODS We studied predation on a natural population of female Nephila davipes (L.) (Araneae: Tetrag- nathidae) on the grounds of the Hotel Posada Loma, Fortin de las Flores, Veracruz, Mexico, where they exist solitarily, in single-species groups and in association with a colonial orb-weaving spider, Metepeira incrassata F.O. Pickard-Cam- bridge (Araneae: Araneidae) (Hodge 1990). The habitat is classified as high semi-evergreen selva (Gomez-Pompa 1977) and the study site con- sisted of approximately 1.5 hectares of unen- closed botanical gardens. Evidence of possible predation was recorded during daily prey capture observations (Hodge 1990) performed between August 18-September 9, 1988. During these ob- servations, groups and individuals on the grounds were inspected during the morning, and again before dark. A predation attempt was assumed to have occurred if an individual was present on her web between approximately 0600 h and 1 200 h, but was absent from the web and the area immediately surrounding the web before night- fall, and evidence of predation was found. Such evidence consisted of the presence of a large hole in the orb-web, which is a reliable sign of pre- dation attempts by birds (Higgins, in press). It is possible that such damaged webs could also be caused by large insects impacting the web and then escaping. However, in such cases the spider usually rebuilds all or part of the web rather than relocating. When Nephila voluntarily relocate, they usually do so during the night, after ingesting the orb web (Horton 1982; Higgins, in press; Hodge, pers. obs.). The average population size of each of the three categories of N. davipes was estimated from three different censuses performed during the study period (Table 1). The number of N. davipes in each category in the area of the predator attack observations was recorded during each census. Relative predation on each category of N. da- vipes was estimated by calculating the percentage which disappeared due to apparent predation. The mean group size of intraspecific groups in the population during the study period was 3.76 ± 2.34 (n = 20 groups). To test the “early-warning” hypothesis, pre- Table 1.— Estimated relative predation attempts on solitary, single-species and mixed-species associated N. davipes between August 18 and September 9, 1988 (estimated population size = mean number of indi- viduals in each category based on three censuses ± standard deviation). Estimated Evidence of population predation size attempts Solitary individuals 36 ± 2.08 12(33%) Intraspecific groups 77 ± 2.52 8 (10%) Mixed-species groups 43 ± 5.13 4 (9%) dation attempts were simulated by disturbing webs of arbitrarily chosen individuals by tapping with a stick (the “pencil-poke” method: Tolbert 1975). Tapping was initiated as far from the cen- ter of the orb as possible, usually where the web was attached to vegetation. If no response was elicited, the disturbance was moved toward the orb at 1 cm intervals until a response was elicited, or until the center of the orb (where the spider sits) was reached. The distance (cm) from the disturbance at which each spider performed an antipredator response was recorded. Behaviors scored as antipredator responses were: drop from web, run off web or shake web. All of the web disturbances were performed on a single day (September 12, 1988) to control for possible ef- fects of differences in temperature or other en- vironmental variables on spider response. The conditions were cloudy, so no spiders were under heat stress, and the ambient temperature was 24 °C. The mean size of intraspecific groups in- volved in these manipulations was 3.28 ± 1.98 {n = 1 groups). The size of the Metepeira in- crassata colonies ranged from approximately 500-1000 spiders. RESULTS Solitary N. davipes experienced a greater per- centage of predation attempts than did single-or mixed-species groups, which had similar levels (Table 1; G-test, P < 0.01). Response distances of solitary N. davipes subject to the mock-pre- dation disturbance were significantly less than those of individuals in single- or mixed-species groups (Table 2; Kruskal- Wallis, P < 0.05). The primary difference was between grouped webs and solitary webs {P < 0.05; non-parametric multiple comparison procedure, Zar 1 984); there was no difference between response distances of 214 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 2.— Comparison of distances at which re- sponse was elicited to simulated predation by solitary, single-species and mixed-species associated N. clavipes (response distance = mean ± standard deviation; n = number of individuals in each category). Response distance (cm) n Solitary individuals 21.5 ± 26.7 20 Intraspecific groups 41.9 ± 25.3 26 Mixed-species groups 38.4 ± 33.6 19 single- or mixed-species groups (Table 2). Thus, there was no early-warning benefit to N. clavipes associated with groups of M. incrassata exceed- ing that of individuals in single-species groups. DISCUSSION These data support predictions that grouped spiders benefit from lower predation and/or an early-warning system. They do not, however, support the hypothesis that odd group members (i. e., N. clavipes in M. incrassata colonies) are selectively preyed upon. Nephila in both single- and mixed-species groups suffered a lower fre- quency of predation attempts and had greater response distances than solitary individuals. However, there was no evidence that individuals living in M. incrassata colonies had any greater advantages than those living in single-species groups. The similarly low predation frequency on both types of groups may be related to hesi- tation on the part of wasp or bird predators to attack grouped webs. An alternative explanation, however, may be related to a foraging related benefit of group living. Nephila in single and mixed-species groups capture significantly more prey biomass, and hence are larger in body size than the solitary individuals (Hodge 1 990). De- pending on the size of the predator, there may be limits to the size of spider that they will attack. The greater response distances observed for grouped webs was most likely a function of more silk between the “potential predator” and the spider than exists in solitary webs, and thus a greater distance over which vibrations could be detected. In natural situations, individual escape behaviors might transmit vibrations and elicit evasive behavior among other members of the group. Two factors may account for the lack of difference in response distance between single- and mixed-species associated N. clavipes. First, it was only possible to use somewhat peripheral spiders as focal animals in mixed-species groups (which typically contained 500-1000 spiders) to avoid reaching into and partially destroying the colony. The amount of silk between the experi- menter and the spider was therefore probably not much different in single-species or mixed-species situations. In addition, even if the distances had been different, there may be an upper limit to the distance that disturbance vibrations can be transmitted before they attenuate. Therefore, there may be some upper limit of group size beyond which no additional early-warning ben- efit will accrue. However, the possibility does exist that had a different experimental protocol been used a slightly greater response distance may have been detected for N. clavipes in M. incras- sata colonies, since these colonies do have more silk, and hence, a greater potential distance for signal transmission. Existing evidence suggests that foraging ben- efits most likely select for tolerance and coloni- ality in spiders (Lubin 1974; Rypstra 1989; Uetz 1988, 1989) and conditions of very high prey density favor the formation of mixed-species as- sociation as well (Rypstra 1979, 1983; Hodge 1 990). Large spider colonies may actually be a liability with respect to predation since they po- tentially attract more egg-sac parasites (Lubin 1974; Rypstra 1979; Buskirk 1981; Smith 1982; Heiber & Uetz 1990). However, the results of this study indicate that some antipredator ben- efits may result from group-living. While not necessarily the driving force behind the evolu- tion of social tendencies in spiders, such anti- predator benefits may, in some cases, be an ad- vantageous fortuitous effect of both single- and mixed-species associations between web-build- ing spiders. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank S. Marshall, L. Higgins and K. Can- gialosi for helpful comments on an earlier ver- sion of this manuscript. Funding for this project was provided by grants from a National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant BSR-8601078, the University of Cincin- nati Research Council, Sigma Delta Epsilon (Graduate Women in Science); Sigma Xi, and the Exline-Frizzel fund (California Academy of Sciences). HODGE & UETZ-ANTIPREDATOR BENEFITS OF GROUPING BY NEPHILA 215 LITERATURE CITED Askenmo, C., A. von Bromssen, J. Ekman & C. Jans- son. 1977. Impact of some wintering birds on spi- der abundance in spruce. Oikos, 28: 90-94. Barnard, C. J. & D. B. A. Thompson. 1985. Gulls and plovers: the ecology and behaviour of mixed- species feeding groups. Columbia University Press, New York. Berry, J. W. 1987. Notes on the life history and be- havior of the communal spider Cyrtophora mol- uccensis (Doleschall) (Araneae, Araneidae) in Yap, Caroline Islands. J. ArachnoL, 15:309-319. Bradoo, B. L. 1972. Life history and bionomics of Idris sp. nov. (Scelionidae: Hymenoptera) egg par- asite of Uloborus ferokus, a commensal of social spider Stegodyphus sarasinorum Karsch. Zool. Anz., 188:43-52. Bradoo, B. L. 1979. Uloborus ferokus sp. nov. (Ar- aneidae: Uloboridae) a commensal of Stegodyphus sarasinorum Karsch. Bull. British. ArachnoL Soc., 4:353-355. Buskirk, R. E. 1981. Sociality in the Arachnida, Pp. 281-367, In Social Insects. (H. R. Hermann, ed.). Vol. II. Academic Press, New York. Eisner, T. & S. Nowicki. 1 983. Spider web protection through visual advertisement: role of the stabili- mentum. Science, 219:185-187. Farr, J. A. 1977. Social behavior of the golden silk spider TVep/zi/fl clavipes. J. Arachnol., 4:137-144. Gomez-Pompa, A. 1973. Ecology of the vegetation of Veracruz, In Vegetation and vegetational history of northern Latin America. (A. Graham, ed.). El- sevier Publishing Co., Amsterdam. Gunnarsson, B. 1983. Winter mortality of spruce- living spiders: effect of spider interaction and bird predation. Oikos, 40:226-233. Hamilton, W. D. 1971. Geometry for the selfish herd. J. Theor. Biol, 31:295-211. Heiber, C. S. & G. W. Uetz. 1990. Colony size and parasitoid load in two species of colonial Metepeira spiders from Mexico (Araneae: Araneidae). Oecol- ogia, 82:145-150. Higgins, L. in press. Developmental changes in bar- rier web structure under differing levels of predation risk. J. Insect Behav., 00:00-00. Hodge, M. A. 1 990. The behavioral ecology of mixed- species groups of web-building spiders. Ph.D. Dis- sertation. Univ. of Cincinnati; Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. Horton, C. C. 1980. A defensive function for the stabilimenta of two orb-weaving spiders (Araneae: Araneidae). Psyche, 87:13-20. Horton, C.C. 1982. Predators of two orb-web spiders (Araneae, Araneidae). J. Arachnol., 11:447^49. Jackson, R. R. 1986. Communal jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from Kenya: interspecific nest complexes, cohabitation with web-building spiders. and intraspecific interactions. New Zealand J. ZooL, 13:13-26. Lopez, A. 1988. Nephila inaurata inaurata (Walck- enaer) and other Reunion Island orb- weavers. Newsl. British Arachnol. Soc., 51:2-3. Lubin, Y. D. 1 974. Adaptive advantages and the evo- lution of colony formation in Cyrtophora (Araneae: Araneidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 54:321-339. McCook, H. C. 1890. American spiders and their spinning work. Vol. 11. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia. Milinski, M. 1977. Experiments on the selection by predators against spatial oddity of their prey. Z. TierpsychoL, 43:31 1-325. Moore, C. W. 1977. The life cycle, habitat and vari- ation in selected web parameters in the spider Neph- ila clavipes Koch (Araneidae). American Midi. Nat., 98:95-108. Morse, D. H. 1977. Feeding behavior and predator avoidance in heterospecific groups. Bioscience, 27: 332-339. Morse, D. H. 1980. Behavioral Mechanisms in Ecol- ogy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mas- sachusetts. Mueller, H. C. 1975. Hawks select odd prey. Science, 188:953-954. Ohguchi, O. 1978. Experiments on the selection against colour oddity of water fleas by three-spined sticklebacks. Z. TierpsychoL, 47:254-267. Pulliam, H. R. & T. Caraco. 1984. Living in groups: is there an optimal group size?. Pp. 122-147, In Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 2nd ed.,(J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies, eds.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. Robinson, M. H. & B. Robinson. 1976. The ecology and behavior of Nephila maculata. a supplement. Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 218:122. Rypstra, A. L. 1979. Foraging flocks of spiders: a study in aggregate behavior in Cyrtophora citricola Forskal (Araneae: Araneidae) in West Africa. Be- hav. Ecol. SociobioL, 5:291-300. Rypstra, A. L. 1983. The importance of food and space in limiting web-spider densities: a test using field enclosures. Oecologia, 59:312-319. Rypstra, A. L. 1 984. A relative measure of predation on web-building spiders in temperate and tropical forests. Oikos, 43:129-132. Rypstra, A. L. 1985. Aggregations of Nephila clavipes (L.) in relation to prey availability. J. Arachnol., 1 3: 71-78. Rypstra, A. L. 1989. Foraging success of solitary and aggregated spiders: insights into flock formation. Anim. Behav., 37:274-281. Sabath, M. D., L. E. Sabath & A. M. Moore. 1974. Web, reproduction and commensals of the semi- social spider Cyrtophora moluccensis (Araneae: Ar- aneidae) on Guam, Mariana Islands. Micronesica, 10:51-55. Shear, W. A. 1970. The evolution of social phenom- 216 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY ena in spiders. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 1:65- 76. Smith, D. R. R. 1982. Ecological costs and benefits of communal behavior in a presocial spider. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 13:107-114. Spiller, D. A. & T. W. Schoener. 1989. Effect of a major predator on grouping of an orb-weaving spi- der. J. Anim. Ecol., 58:509. Strusaker, T. T. 1969. Notes on the spiders Uloborus WM«r//or (Chamberlain & Ivie) and Nephila ciavipes (L.) in Panama. American Midi. Nat., 82:61 1-613. Tolbert, W. W. 1975. Predator avoidance behaviors and web defensive structures in the orb weavers Argiope aurantia and Argiope trifasciata (Araneae, Araneidae). Psyche, 82:29-52. Uetz,G.W. 1985. Ecology and behavior of Metepe/ra spinipes (Araneae: Araneidae) a colonial web-build- ing spider from Mexico. Nat. Geogr. Res. Rep., 19: 597-609. Uetz, G. W. 1988. Group foraging in colonial web- building spiders: evidence for risk-sensitivity. Be- hav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 22:265-270. Uetz, G. W. 1989. The “ricochet effect” and prey capture in colonial spiders. Oecologia, 81:154-159. Vollrath, F. 1985. Web spider’s dilemma: a risky move or site dependent growth. Oecologia, 68:69- 72. Yoshida, M. 1988. The spiders intruding into the webs of Nephila clavata - a consideration in relation to the densities of spiders. Acta Arachnol., 36: 1-10. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd ed. Pren- tice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Manuscript received 7 January 1992, revised 13 April 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:217-221 DISPERSAL OF THE SPIDERLINGS OF XYSTICUS EMERTONI (ARANEAE, THOMISIDAE), A LITTER^DWELLING CRAB SPIDER Douglass H. Morse: Graduate Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Division of Biology and Medicine, Box G-W, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912 USA ABSTRACT. Dispersing spiderlings of Xysticus emertoni (Thomisidae), a litter-dwelling species, placed on sites similar to their nests on leaves usually descended quickly into the vegetation below. However, those placed on nearby goldenrod (Solidago spp.) flowers remained significantly longer, sometimes hunting, before dropping lower in the vegetation. They seldom ballooned from either site. Xysticus dispersal behavior differs markedly from that of the thomisid Misumena vatia, a flower-inhabiting species, which balloons regularly from leaves and remains much longer on goldenrod flowers than Xysticus. Resource spacing and availability play an im- portant role in an individual’s predisposition to disperse (Southwood 1962; Richter 1970; Dingle 1984). In turn, dispersal patterns influence other aspects of the life styles of the individuals in question. Combined, these factors should exert a dominant impact on patterns of gene flow and consequent population structure. It is therefore instructive to compare the dispersal patterns of related species with extremely different life styles. Two thomisid crab spiders, Xysticus emertoni Keyserling and Misumena vatia (Clerck), pro- vide such a comparison. Xysticus is primarily an inhabitant of herbaceous vegetation and litter in fields and pastures of eastern North America (Comstock 1940; Dondale & Redner 1978). Al- though it sometimes hunts in flowers at the top of the herbaceous layer, Xysticus occurs much less frequently, remains for shorter periods, and as an adult experiences considerably lower hunt- ing success in flowers than does Misumena (Morse 1983) . The latter species concentrates its activ- ities, especially as an adult, at flowers (Morse 1984) . Nevertheless, Xysticus sometimes places its nests in emergent herbaceous plants, as does Misumena. This placement presents Xysticus spiderlings with an excellent opportunity to dis- perse. Although thomisid spiders regularly occur in samples of aerial “plankton” (Glick 1939; Salm- on & Homer 1977; Greenstone et al. 1987), re- ports often do not distinguish between species or genera. Most frequently, reference is made to Misumenops F. Pickard-Cambridge and Misu- menoides F. Pickard-Cambridge in these catches, because these are the thomisid genera that dom- inate the aerial fauna— Xysticus is extremely rare in aerial catches (M. H. Greenstone, pers. comm.). Other than for Richter’s (1970, 1971), Green- stone’s (1982), and Miller’s (1984) studies on lycosids, no experimental effort has been made to compare the ballooning by different species of a spider family, although Tolbert (1977) pro- vides some comparative information on two ara- neid species. I therefore tested dispersal patterns of Xysticus emertoni spiderlings for comparison with recent results (Morse in press) on the dispersal of Mis- umena vatia spiderlings. In the latter study I es- tablished that Misumena readily balloon after emerging from their egg sacs, although the pro- pensity to do so is strongly influenced by the substrate they occupy. If the nest sites offer rich foraging opportunities for the spiderlings, pri- marily flowering goldenrods (Solidago spp.) in my study area, they are very likely to remain and feed in them. Their consequent foraging success and subsequent growth at these sites decrease their probability of ballooning. However, Mis- umena of all ages live above the litter in their habitat, concentrating their activities in flowers, a characteristic associated with a nearly contin- uous quest for insect food. In light of the much less frequent occupation of the somewhat ex- posed sites by Xysticus, and the seemingly more homogeneous areas that they occupy low in the 217 218 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY vegetation, one may predict a considerably lower probability of ballooning than for Misumena, even though Xysticus nests are often placed in positions that make this type of dispersal pos- sible. In the present study, I tested the propensity of second instar Xysticus spiderlings, newly emerged from their egg sacs, to balloon in experimental situations similar to those under which I had tested Misumena spiderlings. I then compared the two species, paying particular attention to the implications of these differences for dispersal, potential gene flow and population structure in general. METHODS I found several Xysticus emertoni nests on broad-leaved vegetation in the study area while pursuing other work. I measured key parameters of their locations as I encountered them, but made no special attempt to hunt for them in the litter layer. Thus, I do not claim that those nests are typical of all X. emertoni. Young were taken from these nests for release experiments (discussed be- low), and others were taken from broods laid in the laboratory, for a total of 22 broods. I released over 200 newly-emerged, second in- star Xysticus spiderlings from locations that re- sembled one of their frequent nest sites, leaves of the common milkweed Asclepias syriaca\ and inflorescences of nearby goldenrod clones {Soli- dago juncea and 5. canadensis) that attracted large numbers of tiny insects. Five young from a single brood were placed on a substrate (milk- weed leaf or goldenrod inflorescence) at a time, the maximum number that an observer could carefully watch and record under these condi- tions. These densities frequently occur when they emerge from a nest. All statistics were run on the responses of groups of spiderlings, with only one group used from a brood in any experiment. Pri- or to release the spiderlings were lightly dusted with powdered red micronite dye, which in- creased their visibility to the observer. Earlier experiments with Misumena spiderlings had demonstrated that this manipulation did not af- fect their subsequent behavior (Morse in press). The studies were carried out in a field in Bremen, Lincoln Co., Maine, an area that I have described in detail elsewhere (Morse 1979, 1981). I observed these spiderlings continuously dur- ing the first two hours following release, or until they had all dispersed. If any remained at the end of two hours I censused them twice or more daily to determine the approximate time at which they dispersed from the substrate on which they were released. I recorded movements of these spiderlings, the time they remained on the sub- strates to which they were introduced, and the methods by which they left these sites (balloon- ing, dropping on lines, etc.). I then compared these results with those fox Misumena spiderlings that had been exposed to similar experiments (Morse in press). RESULTS Location of Xysticus nests in the field.— I found nine Xysticus emertoni nests during 1989-1991, of which a majority (five) were on milkweed, two on aster {Aster sp.), one on chokecherry {Prunus virginiana), and one on raspberry {Rubus sp.). The nests were constructed at the ends of leaves, and on all but the aster the distal tip was turned under the rest of the leaf and secured, the eggs laid between the two resulting thicknesses of leaf, and the sides drawn tight by silk into a compact nest. These nests resembled those of Misumena (figure 1, Morse 1985), except that Xysticus mothers ensconced themselves inside their nests, rather than guarding the nests from the outside. In contrast, Xysticus folded the narrow aster leaves twice, permitting a nest to be fashioned by essentially providing a third side from plant material. In a sample now exceeding 1 500, 1 have never seen a Misumena nest built by folding a leaf in the latter way. Nests were all located in low vegetation at a mean height of 54.9 (± 12.1 SD) cm, in vege- tation of? 1.3 ± 17.8 cm. The nests on milkweed most frequently occupied the third pair of leaves from the top, ranging from the second to the fifth from the top. Movement of Xysticus spiderlings on various substrates.— Yysi/cwi' spiderlings have a strong tendency to descend into the litter when placed on substrates similar to the ones on which their parents normally build their nests. This behavior occurred both in young placed on the normal sites (milkweed leaves) and on nearby goldenrod flowers at the peak of bloom (Table 1), a source at which large numbers of tiny insects, potential prey of these spiderlings, often congregate. How- ever, they responded quantitatively differently to these two substrates, remaining significantly lon- ger on goldenrod than on milkweed (Table 1) (P < 0.05 in a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test). MORSE- DISPERSAL OF XYSTICUS SPIDERLINGS 219 Table 1. — Time (min) that newly emerged Xysticus spiderlings remained on different substrates, with similar results on Misumena for comparison (Morse in press), a = Misumena remained 1 76. 1 ± 25 1 .5 min on milkweed, 3820.0 ± 3435.5 min on goldenrod (Morse in press), b = 19 of 50 Misumena released on milkweed were observed to balloon, but none of 50 released on goldenrod were observed to balloon (Morse in press). ■ , Method of dispersal Time remained Substrate Year N (X ± SD) Drop Line Balloon Not Known Milkweed"" 1987 92 8.1 ± 11.9 64 17 gb 3 1990 65 18.0 ± 21.0 53 4 0 8 Goldenrod"" 1990 38 114.8 ± 169.1 11 0 2» 25 1991 10 144.4 ± 203.8 5 0 0 5 Further, numbers of spiderlings observed quick- ly dropping on lines directly to the litter from milkweed far exceeded those dropping from goldenrod {P < 0.002 in a two-tailed Mann- Whitney LZ-test). This difference, combined with observations of two Xysticus spiderlings captur- ing tiny midges on goldenrod during these pe- riods, suggested that they used these flowers as hunting sites. This result is consistent with oc- casional observations of early-instar Xysticus on these sites under unmanipulated conditions (Ta- ble 2). The most frequent movement from the release sites was directly into the litter, either on vertical lines or by crawling down the vegetation (Table 1). These movements occurred significantly more frequently than dispersal via horizontal lines to adjacent grass stems {P < 0.01 for milkweed, P = 0.05 for goldenrod in Wilcoxon matched pairs signed ranks tests). The outcome of most moves on horizontal lines probably did not differ in function from the vertical movements, how- ever, since all such individuals that I could follow on horizontal lines used their new locations as staging sites from which to move into the litter, rather than for aerial dispersal. Some of the latter movements could have been a consequence of the wind moving the line-laying spiders from a vertical to horizontal position while they were leaving the original sites. Although the results clearly indicated that Xysticus does balloon, it was the least common of the activities recorded in these releases (Table 1). Movement of Xysticus and Misumena spider- lings.—Although Xysticus spiderlings resembled Misumena spiderlings in remaining significantly longer on goldenrod (foraging substrate) than on milkweed (nest substrate), they stayed on both of these sites only a small fraction of the time that Misumena did (Table 1), differences that are highly significant {P < 0.002 for goldenrod, P < 0.00 1 for milkweed in two-tailed Mann-Whitney (7-tests). These results are consistent with their parents’ habits and with the relative scarcity of Xysticus spiderlings on goldenrods and other flowers. In censuses of spiderlings on goldenrods only two Xysticus spiderlings were found on over 900 inflorescences, in comparison to over 600 Misumena spiderlings (Table 2). Also striking is the difference in dispersal modes of Xysticus and Misumena spiderlings from the release sites. Although a majority of Xysticus spi- derlings left these sites for the litter, either di- rectly by lines or by crawling down the vegeta- Table 2.— Numbers of Xysticus and Misumena spiderlings on flowering goldenrod. a = Each clump is distinct from others and probably a clone, b = Involves daily counts over I'h to 3 ‘/2-week period following release of a total of 404 Misumena spiderlings. Sample of goldenrod Number of clumps"" Number of flowering stems Number of Xysticus spiderlings Number of Misumena spiderlings Randomly chosen 25 111 1 248 > 5 m from Misumena nest 10 151 0 27 < 1 m from Misumena nest 12 439 0 359 Release of 4 Misumena broods'" 4 42 1 - 220 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY tion, Misurnena spiderlings never descended to the litter (Table 1). This difference is highly sig- nificant {P < 0.002 for both milkweed and gold- enrod in two-tailed Mann-Whitney [/-tests), as is the difference in frequency with which the two species balloon from milkweed {P < 0.002 in a two-tailed Mann-Whitney [/-test) (Table 1). Al- though a few Xysticus were observed to balloon off goldenrod as well as milkweed in the trials, Misurnena were observed to balloon only off milkweed. Nevertheless, the frequency of bal- looning from goldenrod by Xysticus was so low that the two species did not differ significantly {P > 0.05 in a two-tailed Mann-Whitney [/-test). Since many Xysticus left goldenrod within the two-hour period of continuous observation (Ta- ble 1), the probability of observing them bal- looning from goldenrod was far higher than for Misurnena. Misurnena remained for long peri- ods, often several days, on goldenrod (Table 1), and they were only censused a few times a day after the original observation period. DISCUSSION The behavior of Xysticus spiderlings resem- bled that of Misurnena spiderlings in that dis- persal time was related to substrate in both spe- cies. This difference strongly suggests that they discriminate between sites. However, actual times required to disperse were considerably shorter for Xysticus than for Misurnena. This brief ten- ure is consistent with Xysticus'% distribution at similar heights as adults (Morse 1983). Richter (1970) and Greenstone (1982) have provided the only previous experimental studies on between-species differences in ballooning pat- terns, although they have all been performed in the laboratory using artificial wind, heat, and light sources. Young wolf spiders of different Pardosa species vary in their ballooning tendencies, which Richter attributed to the abundance and stability of their habitats, and Greenstone to the predict- ability of the habitats. Propensity to balloon dif- fered inversely with each of these traits. Abun- dant habitats often have a low level of patchiness. This study thus suggests that spatial patchiness may be added to the variable of temporal patch- iness as a factor affecting ballooning. Both thom- isids live in similar habitats, but as a result of their markedly different demands on these hab- itats, they probably view patchiness at strikingly different scales. For most or all of its stages, Mis- umena depends on insects drawn to extremely patchy flower resources, but Xysticus does not depend primarily on this resource. Even when Xysticus does hunt on flowers, it remains there for much shorter periods than Misurnena, with a periodicity suggesting that its poor hunting suc- cess may account for the short tenure (Morse 1983). Because Xysticus obtains a major part of its prey away from the flowers, within the veg- etation and litter layers, its resources are not like- ly to be as patchy as those of Misurnena. Xysticus should therefore balloon less frequently than Misurnena, as observed. Thus the two species appear to respond to the same habitat in dis- tinctly different ways, notwithstanding their sim- ilar size and close phylogenetic relationship. These results, plus the infrequent natural pres- ence of Xysticus spiderlings on goldenrod, sug- gest that the latter spider seldom moves above the litter layer. Consequently, its dispersal dis- tances as juveniles are likely to be low. Gene flow should thus be much lower in Xysticus than in Misurnena, which should in turn generate dif- ferences of population structure in the two spe- cies. Nevertheless, since Xysticus sometimes bal- looned, it clearly retains the ability to initiate long-distance movement. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank M. H. Greenstone, J. D. Parrish, G. Stratton, and R. B. Suter for reading a draft of this manuscript. My research on Misurnena is supported by the National Science Foundation (BSR85-16279 and BSR90-07722). I thank H. Heller, J. Kotanchik, N. McKay, and J. Rollen- hagen for assistance with the field work, E. B. Noyce for kindly permitting use of the study site, and M. H. Greenstone for information on tho- misid genera in aerial samples. LITERATURE CITED Comstock, J. H. 1940. The spider book, revised and edited by W. J. Gertsch. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. Dondale, C. D. & J. H. Redner. 1978. The insects and arachnids of Canada, Part 5. The crab spiders of Canada and Alaska. Canada Dept, of Agriculture Publ. 1663:1-255. Glick, P. A. 1939. The distribution of insects, spiders, and mites in the air. United States Dept, of Agri- culture Tech. Bull., 671:1-150. Greenstone, M. H. 1982. Ballooning frequency and habitat predictability in two wolf spider species (Ly- cosidae: Pardosa). Florida Entomol., 65:83-89. Greenstone, M. H., C. E. Morgan, A.-L. Hultsch, R. MORSE -DISPERSAL OF XYSTICUS SPIDERLINGS 221 A. Farrow, & J. E. Dowse. 1987. Ballooning spi- ders in Missouri, USA, and New South Wales, Aus- tralia: family and mass distributions. J. Arachnol., 15:163-170. Miller, G. L. 1 984. Ballooning in Geolycosa turricola (Treat) and Geolycosa patellonigm Wallace: high dispersal frequencies in stable habitats. Canadian J. ZooL, 62:2110-2111. Morse, D. H. 1979. Prey capture by the crab spider Misumena calycina (Araneae: Thomisidae). Oec- ologia, 39:309-319. Morse, D. H. 1981. Prey capture by the crab spider Misumena vatia (L.) (Thomisidae) on three com- mon native flowers. American Midi. Natur., 105: 358-367. Morse, D. H. 1983. Foraging patterns and time bud- gets of the crab spiders Xysticus emertoni Keyserling and Misumena vatia (Clerck) (Araneae: Thomisi- dae) on flowers. J. Arachnol., 1 1:87-94. Morse, D. H. 1984. How crab spiders (Araneae: Thomisidae) hunt at flowers. J. Arachnol., 12:307- 316. Morse, D. H. 1985. Nests and nest-site selection of the crab spider Misumena vatia (Araneae, Thomis- idae) on milkweed. J. Arachnol., 13:383-390. Morse, D. H. in press. The relationship between dis- persal by spiderlings from their nests and earlier foraging patch decisions made by their mothers. Ecology. Richter, C. J. J. 1970. Aerial dispersal in relation to habitat in eight wolf spider species (Pardosa, Ara- neae, Lycosidae). Oecologia, 5:200-214. Richter, C.J.J. 1971. Some aspects of aerial dispersal in different populations of wolf spiders, with par- ticular reference to Pardosa amentata (Araneae, Ly- cosidae). Misc. Pap., Landouwhogeschool, Wagen- ingen. The Netherlands, 8:77-88. Salmon, J. T. & N. V. Homer. 1977. Aerial disper- sion of spiders in North Central Texas. J. Arachnol., 5:153-157. Southwood, T. R. E. 1962. Migration of terrestrial arthropods in relation to habitat. Biol. Rev., 37: 171-214. Tolbert, W. W. 1977. Aerial dispersal behavior of two orb-weaving spiders. Psyche, 84:13-27. Manuscript received 2 January 1992, revised 3 Septem- ber 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:222-226 COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR AND SEXUAL CANNIBALISM IN THE SEMI-AQUATIC FISHING SPIDER, DOLOMEDES FIMBRIATES (CLERCK) (ARANEAE: PISAURIDAE) Goran Arnqvist: Department of Animal Ecology, University of Umefi; S-901 87 UmeS, Sweden ABSTRACT. The courtship behavior of the semi-aquatic Pisaurid fishing spider Dolomedes fimbriatus was examined in the laboratory. Male courtship was triggered by the presence of female drag-lines, presumably by a female sex pheromone since males did not respond with courtship to male drag-lines. Male courtship behavior included vibratory signaling (water surface waves), leg-waving, and following female drag-lines. Vibratory sig- naling was a major courtship component, and signals were produced at a regular rate (mean rate: 8.33 ± 1.53 s, n = 97). Irrespective of whether females were mated or unmated, females were very aggressive towards males, and sexual cannibalism prior to copulation occurred in 6.6% of the female attacks on males (« = 76). The capture success rate of females depended on whether the male was attacked from a distance or from immediate proximity. The occurrence of sexual cannibalism of courting males by virgin Dolomedes females is discussed, and it is suggested that this behavior of fishing spiders may represent an adaptive female strategy rather than mistaken identity. The semi-aquatic fishing spiders of the genus Dolomedes (Pisauridae) are large spiders that in- habit various freshwater habitats such as the shoreline of streams and lakes (Carico 1973). The main prey of fishing spiders are other aquatic and semi-aquatic invertebrates and vertebrates, and terrestrial invertebrates trapped at the water surface (Bleckmann & Lotz 1987; Zimmermann & Spence 1989). The sensory ecology of fishing spiders with regards to predation has been rather well examined (Carico 1973; Williams 1979; Ro- land & Rovner 1983; Bleckmann & Barth 1984; Bleckmann & Rovner 1984; Bleckmann 1985). In contrast, the reproductive behavior of fishing spiders has been thoroughly described only for the Nearctic species D. triton, where vibratory, tactile, chemical, and visual communication all play important roles during courtship (Roland & Rovner 1983; Bleckmann & Bender 1987). Such information of the Holarctic species D. fimbria- tus is limited, and only scattered observations in older studies are available (Pappenheim 1903; Gerhardt 1926; Schmidt 1953, 1957). The purpose of the current study is to describe male courtship behavior as well as female re- sponse to male courtship in D. fimbriatus, and to evaluate the relative roles of vibratory, tactile, chemical, and visual stimuli during courtship. Dolomedes spiders are known to exhibit sexual cannibalism (females killing and consuming males) (Schmidt 1957; Zimmermann & Spence 1989; Foelix 1982; Elgar 1992), and the occur- rence of sexual cannibalism in D. fimbriatus is quantified and discussed. METHODS Adult D. fimbriatus were collected from a dense population at Sirapsbacken (64° 22' N, 19° 28' E), an alluvial meadow by the river Vindelalven in northern Sweden. A total of 25 females and 17 males was captured on June 17-18, 1991. Individuals were placed individually in plastic aquaria (0.45 x 0.25 m) filled with water to a depth of 8 cm. Each aquarium was provided with three pieces of floating styrox elements (15x5 cm) which served as resting sites. Ambient tem- perature was 20 °C ±1 °C, and males were fed daily one water strider (Gerris odontogaster) per individual. Females were fed one water strider and one field cricket {Gryllus bimaculatus, > 20 mm body length) per individual per day. Behavioral observations were made in trials, where one male was introduced to a female in her aquarium for 50 minutes. When introduced, males were carefully placed at the water surface as far away from the female as possible, on the opposite side of the aquaria. During each trial, the behavior of the spiders was observed visually and videotaped for subsequent behavioral anal- yses from slow motion replays. A total of 36 trials was performed. In a first round of trials (« = 25), all females were exposed to a male. In a second 222 ARNQVIST-COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR IN DOLOMEDES FIMBRIATUS 223 round {n = 11), all females that had not yet laid eggs were allowed a second exposure to a male. Males were numbered individually and used for behavioral trials in numerical order. Thus in- dividuals were chosen systematically for the be- havioral trials, and each female was used 1-2 times and each male 2-3 times (if not eaten by a female in the first round). After the behavioral trials, females were fed (see above) and allowed to lay and tend their eggs. Ten days after the date of egg laying, the egg sac was opened. By this time the embryos in fertilized eggs were clearly visible, and the fertilization rate of the egg batch could thus be recorded. In order to determine the role of chemical stimuli relative to that of visual and tactile in triggering male courtship behavior, a series of experiments was performed. In addition to the behavioral trials described above (treatment I, n = 36), males were also introduced (in numerical/ systematical order by being carefully placed at the water surface) into one of three types of aquaria: male aquarium with a male (treatment II, n = 5), uninhabited new and thus clean aquar- ium with a styrox element from a female aquar- ium (treatment III, n = 6), and uninhabited new and clean aquarium with a styrox element from a male aquarium (treatment IV, n = 5). The sty- rox in treatments III and IV was covered with drag-lines from their previous environment. In each of these trials (treatments II-IV), the spiders were observed for 50 minutes, and it was re- corded only whether or not the introduced male exhibited courtship. RESULTS Of the 25 females brought to the laboratory, 1 7 were penultimates (performed their ultimate moult in the laboratory prior to the behavioral trials) and eight were adults. Seventeen females were thus virgin, whereas the mating status of the females collected as adults was unknown at the time of the behavioral trials. However, the mating status of these females could be deter- mined after the experiments since unmated D. fimbriatus females eat their unfertilized eggs after egg deposition (Schmidt 1957), which is also the case in Pardosa wolf spiders (Lycosidae) (Vlijm et al. 1963; Kessler 1970). After the behavioral trials, 1 6 females laid unfertilized eggs that were partially consumed by the female (15 collected as penultimates and one collected as adult). Nine females laid and tended their eggs (two collected as penultimates and seven as adults). In five cases the egg batches were incompletely fertilized (fer- tilization rate 25-50%) and in four cases the egg batches were completely fertilized (fertilization rate > 95%). Females that tended their egg sac laid 350.8 ± 79.4 eggs per egg sac {n = 9). Courtship. — When a male D. fimbriatus was introduced into an aquarium inhabited by an adult female (treatment I), the initial male re- sponse was an “announcement display”. This behavior commenced on average 3.09 ± 3.21 min (« = 36) after introduction to the aquarium, apparently always when the male first made physical contact with a female drag-line (irre- spective of whether the drag-line was placed on the water surface or on a styrox element). The announcement display consisted of two major components; vibratory signals and leg-waving. Males produced vibratory signals on both sub- strate types, by a slight elevation of the body followed by a sudden jerky lowering of the ab- domen, causing concentric water surface waves to spread out from the male (when vibratory signals were performed at the water surface). These jerks were made in the same manner as in D. triton males (Bleckmann & Bender 1987). Vibratory signals were produced at a regular rate, once every 8.33 ± 1.53 s (« = 97), and males often continued to produce vibratory signals throughout the trials (50 min). During the inter- vibrational pauses, males occasionally per- formed leg-waving, where the spider lifted and waved legs I. When leg- waving, the male alter- nated between the left and right leg in an irregular vertical waving-pattem with the legs typically being held extended forward, straight and stiff. Leg- waving was often combined with a rapid tap- ping with legs I on the substratum, especially when on styrox, presumably producing addi- tional vibrations. When placed in a female aquarium males moved very slowly, typically a few mm/min, normally following a female drag- line with the palps and legs I. Vibratory signals, leg-waving, leg-tapping, and very cautious ad- vance along a female drag-line during the inter- vibrational pauses were alternated. Males per- formed announcement display for 29.36 ± 14.71 min (n = 36) during each trial. Males seemed unable to visually detect mo- tionless females, for males frequently (1.42 ± 0.39 times per trial) passed in very close range (nearest distance between tips of legs less than 2 cm) behind them, apparently without detecting their exact location. The role of chemical stimuli.— Males always 224 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY responded with courtship when placed in a fe- male environment (treatments I and III), but never exhibited courtship in male environment (treatments II and IV) (x^ = 53.0, df = 3, P < 0.001; Table 1). In treatment III, males typically commenced with courtship signaling upon first physical contact with a styrox element from a female cage. Males did not respond to drag-lines of other males (treatment IV). Female response to male courtship. — Females typically remained motionless during the behav- ioral trials with legs III and IV anchored to styrox and the anterior two pairs of legs resting upon the water surface, and no female courtship was observed. However, the females exhibited two different responses to male courtship which will be described below; attack from a distance and passivity. A total of 89 male-female interactions was observed. The first interaction in a trial oc- curred after 26.6 ± 19.7 min {n = 36), and 76% of the interactions consisted of female attacks on males from a distance. The average attack dis- tance was 6.76 ± 3.53 cm {n = 26). In 97% of these long distance attacks males avoided cap- ture by rapid evasive movements, often includ- ing a change of direction (approximately 90°) making it more difficult for females to pursue males. In three of these cases, the males were seized by the females but escaped by rapidly au- totomizing legs. However, in the other 3% of the attacks, males were caught and cannibalized by females. In 24% of the interactions, females remained passive when the male approached. Males mak- ing physical contact with a female immediately started to tap vigorously with legs I and II on her legs and abdomen for 2.03 ± 1.42 min, after which the male immediately mounted the female from behind and attempted copulation. When mounting, males climbed up onto the abdomen of the female, turned around (facing in a direc- tion opposite that of the female) and slid some- what sideways in order to reach the epigynum with its palps. Only two successful copulations occurred. In both cases, only one palp was in- serted and the females involved were virgin fe- males collected as penultimates which later laid and tended incompletely fertilized egg batches. Although no data on exact palpal insertion times were collected, they were both very brief (< 15 sec) in accordance with the observations made by Schmidt (1957). During the phase of physical contact (male on top of female), lasting 1.36 ± 0.83 min, the fe- Table 1.— The occurrence of male Dolomedes fim- briatus courtship behavior in different experimental treatments in the laboratory. No. of trials yield- ing court- Total ship no. of re- Treatment trials sponse I. Male introduced to a female in fe- male aquarium 36 36 II. Male introduced to a male in male aquarium 5 0 III. Male introduced to a new aquar- ium with styrox element from fe- male 6 6 IV. Male introduced to a new aquar- ium with styrox element from male 5 0 male either remained totally passive (62% of the cases) in which case the male attempted copu- lation and then made a sudden vertical jump followed by rapid withdrawal, or females sud- denly attacked the male (38% of the cases). When attacking a male in physical contact, females caught and cannibalized males in 37.5% of the cases, a success rate significantly higher than long distance attacks (Fisher exact contingency table test [two-tailed], P = 0.016). In total (for both types of attacks, n = 76), males were caught and cannibalized in 6.6% of the attacks. There were no apparent differences in response to male courtship between mated and unmated (virgin) females, and females did not differ sig- nificantly in level of aggression; females attacked the male in 73.1% of the interactions involving mated females {n = 26) and in 76.2% of the interactions involving unmated females {n = 63)(Fisher exact contingency table test [two- tailed], P = 0.791). DISCUSSION In general, the courtship behavior of D. fim- briatus includes many components typical for Pisaurid and Lycosid courtship, such as vibra- tory signaling, leg-waving, and female drag-line following (Barth 1982; Foelix 1982; Robinson 1982; Tietjen & Rovner 1980, 1982; Roland & Rovner 1 983; Bleckmann & Bender 1 987). Com- munication between the sexes in D. firnbriatus ARNQVIST- COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR IN DOLOMEDES FIMBRIATUS 225 during courtship probably relies on vibratory (jerks and leg-tapping on substratum), visual (leg- waving), and chemical stimuli during the initial phase and tactile stimuli (leg-tapping on female) during later phases. This is similar to the court- ship behavior of D. triton, where vibratory com- munication has been shown to play a major role during courtship (Roland & Rovner 1983; Bleck- mann & Bender 1987). However, while the water surface wave signals of D. triton are produced at irregular intervals (Roland & Rovner 1983; Bleckmann & Bender 1987), D. fimbriatus pro- duced these signals at a regular rate suggesting that interspecific differences occur in the pattern of signaling. There may be additional differences between the species with regards to signal wave parameters, e.g., frequency content, duration and amplitude (Bleckmann & Bender 1987). In D. scriptus and D. triton, male courtship behavior is triggered by chemical stimuli, and visual/vibrational cues are not required (Kaston 1936; Roland & Rovner 1983). The results of the current study show that this is the case also in D. fimbriatus, and suggest that the female sex pheromone is bound to the female’s drag-line. Distance chemoreception does not seem to occur in D. fimbriatus (cf Tietjen & Rovner 1982). Several previous studies have demonstrated that Dolomedes females may be very aggressive towards courting males, and that sexual canni- balism may occur (Gerhardt 1926; Schmidt 1957; Roland & Rovner 1 983). Further, in a field study of D. triton, Zimmermann & Spence (1989) showed that one of the most important prey items of adult female fishing spiders was adult males, confirming that sexual cannibalism in natural populations is an important phenomenon in this group of spiders. D. fimbriatus females in the current study were extremely aggressive towards males, and female mating status did not affect the level of aggression. Despite vigorous court- ship, males were usually attacked even when ap- proaching virgin or incompletely mated females in most cases, and several instances of sexual cannibalism occurred. It is further worth noting that females had a significantly higher attack suc- cess rate when attacking males in immediate proximity compared to attacks from a distance. There is a current controversy over the evo- lution of sexual cannibalism (Buskirk et al. 1 984; Gould 1984; Elgar 1992). Sexual cannibalism af- ter copulation may represent an adaptive male paternal investment strategy (Thornhill 1976; Buskirk et al. 1984), while sexual cannibalism prior to copulation may be adaptive even for virgin females (Elgar 1991; Newman & Elgar 1991). Sexual cannibalism may also simply rep- resent cases of “mistaken identity” (Robinson 1982; Elgar 1992). Dolomedes females may be characterized as sit-and-wait predators. The pos- terior legs are normally anchored to a firm object (e.g., a rock or the vegetation), while the anterior legs are spread out on the water surface (Carico 1973; Williams 1979). Studies of the sensory ecology of fishing spiders have demonstrated that females in this typical position have a sophisti- cated system for detecting and interpreting water surface wave vibrations, and that females are capable of discriminating prey and non-prey gen- erated surface waves (Williams 1979; Roland & Rovner 1983; Bleckmann & Barth 1984; Bleck- mann & Rovner 1984; Bleckmann 1985). In a study of the vibratory component of courtship, Bleckmann & Bender (1987) concluded that the courtship surface wave signals of male fishing spiders are insufficient to release female prey cap- ture behavior since they lack prey wave char- acteristics, and that females should be able to identify males solely on the basis on vibratory cues. This conclusion, combined with the fact that sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders occurs primarily before copulation (Gerhardt 1926; Schmidt 1957; Roland & Rovner 1983; this study), suggests that cannibalism of courting males by virgin fishing spider females might rep- resent an adaptive female strategy rather than cases of mistaken identity. Virgin D. fimbriatus females may benefit from killing and consuming a courting male provided that the risk of re- maining unmated is low (see Newman & Elgar 1991). However, it is difficult to distinguish be- tween different models of sexual cannibalism, and future work should be directed at testing the various assumptions and predictions of the mod- el of Newman & Elgar (1991). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks are due to C. Otto for constructive comments on the manuscript, and to S. Diehl for providing assistance with the experiments. LITERATURE CITED Barth, F. G. 1 982. Spiders and vibratory signals; sen- sory reception and behavioral significance. Pp. 67- 122, In Spider communication: mechanisms and ecological significance. (P. N. Witt & J. S. Rovner, eds.). Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Bleckmann, H. 1985. Discrimination between prey 226 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY and non-prey wave signals in the fishing spider Do- lomedes triton (Pisauridae). Pp. 2 1 5-222, In Acous- tic and vibrational communication in insects. (K. Kalmring & N. Eisner, eds.). Parey Verlag, Berlin. Bleckmann, H. & F. G. Barth. 1984. Sensory ecology of a semi-aquatic spider (Dolomedes triton). II. The release of predatory behavior by water surface waves. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 14:303-312. Bleckmann, H. & M. Bender. 1987. Water surface waves generated by the male pisaurid spider Do- lomedes triton (Walckenaer) during courtship be- havior. J. Arachnol., 15:363-369. Bleckmann, H. & T. Lotz. 1987. The vertebrate- catching behavior of the fishing spider Dolomedes triton (Araneae, Pisauridae). Anim. Behav., 35:641- 651. Bleckmann, H. & J . S. Rovner. 1984. Sensory ecology of a semi-aquatic spider (Dolomedes triton). I. Roles of vegetation and wind-generated waves in site se- lection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 14:297-301. Buskirk, R. E., C. Frolich & K. E. Ross. 1984. The natural selection of sexual cannibalism. American Nat., 123:612-625. Carico, J. E. 1973. The Nearctic species of the genus Dolomedes (ArancaQ-. Pisauridae). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 144:435-488. Elgar, M. A. 1991. Sexual cannibalism, size dimor- phism, and courtship behavior in orb-weaving spi- ders (Araneidae). Evolution, 45:444^48. Elgar, M. A. 1 992. Sexual cannibalism in spiders and other invertebrates. Pp. 128-155, In Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. (M. A. Elgar & B. J. Crespi, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, Ox- ford. Foelix, R. F. 1 982. Biology of spiders. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Gould, S. J. 1984. Only his wings remained. Nat. Hist., 93:10-18. Gerhardt, U. 1 926. Weitere untersuchungen zur Bio- logic der Spinnen. Z. Morphol. Okol. Tiere, 6: 1-77. Kaston, B. J. 1936. The senses involved in the court- ship of some vagabond spiders. Entomol. Ameri- cana, 16:97-167. Kessler, A. 1970. Egg production in Pardosa. I. In- fluence of mating on the egg-ripening period in Par- dosa lugubris (WaIckenaer)(Araneae, Lycosidae). Bull. Mus. National D’Hist. Nat., suppl. I, 2:98- 101. Newman, J. A. & M. A. Elgar. 1991. Sexual canni- balism in orb-weaving spiders: an economic model. American Nat., 138:1372-1395. Schmidt, G. 1953. Fine deutsche Spinne, die Wir- beltiere friBt, Orion 7/8. Schmidt, G. 1957. Einige Notizen fiber Dolomedes fimbriatus (Cl.). Zool. Anz., 158:83-97. Pappenheim, P. 1 903. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der En- twicklungsgeschichte von Dolomedes fimbriatus Clerck. Z. Wiss. Zool., 74:109-154. Robinson, M. H. 1982. Courtship and mating be- havior in spiders. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 27:1-20. Roland, C. & J. S. Rovner. 1983. Chemical and vi- bratory communication in the aquatic pisaurid spi- der Dolomedes triton (Araneae: Pisauridae). J. Ar- achnol., 1 1:77-85. Thornhill, R. 1976. Sexual selection and paternal in- vestments in insects. American Nat., 1 10:153-163. Tietjen, W. J. & J. S. Rovner. 1980. Trail-following behaviour in two species of wolf spiders: sensory and etho-ecological concomitants. Anim. Behav., 28:735-741. Tietjen, W. J. & J. S. Rovner. 1982. Chemical com- munication in Lycosids and other spiders. Pp. 249- 279, In Spider communication: mechanisms and ecological significance. (P. N. Witt & J. S. Rovner, eds.). Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Vlijm, L., A. Kessler & C. J. J. Richter. 1963. The life-history of Pardosa amentata (Cl.) (Araneae, Ly- cosidae). Ent. Ber. 23:75-80. Williams, D. S. 1979. The feeding behavior of New Zealand Dolomedes species (Araneae: Pisauridae). New Zealand J. Zool., 6:95-105. Zimmerman, M. & J. R. Spence. 1989. Prey use of the fishing spider Dolomedes triton (Pisauridae, Ara- neae): an important predator of the neuston com- munity. Oecologia, 80:187-194. Manuscript received 25 May 1992, revised 11 Septem- ber 1992. 1992. The Journal of Arachnology 20:227-228 BOOK REVIEW Martin Lister’s English Spiders, 1678. Trans- lated by Malcolm Davies and Basil Harley, ed- ited by John Parker and Basil Harley. Harley Books, Colchester, England. 160 pp.; Hardbound £49.95 [$87.65], paperback £24.95 [$43.80], + shipping overseas £3.50 [$6.15]. Some years ago a student, well versed in arach- nid literature, told me that it was Martin Lister (1638-1712) who first separated species by pal- pal morphology. As no English translation was available, I never checked Lister’s Latin volume to see whether the story was correct. This is the first time Lister has been translated into English. Only the spider part is included, not the second part, which is on freshwater and marine mol- lusks. There is, however, a 1778 translation of Lister’s work into German. Lister described molting, courtship and cop- ulation of spiders, and also feeding of its young by Theridion sisyphium. Lister correctly sepa- rated males from females by the swollen palpi of the males. He observed that spiders have no penis but use their swollen palpi to touch the females abdomen, while “two-eyed spiders’’ (op- ilionids) have a penis. He counted eyes and legs and leg articles, and described eight-eyed spiders with anal appendages, a six-eyed spider {Dys- dem), and two-eyed spiders (now called Opi- liones and Acari) that lacked a pedicel. He dif- ferentiated eggs and eggsacs and generalized that small spiders produce few eggs, large spiders pro- duce many, that some spiders carry egg sacs around with them, and that spiders have no lar- vae. He observed that spiders produce numerous threads at the same time from the anal append- ages, and can ascend by submitting themselves to a gentle breeze or can attach a bridge of air- borne silk to an object some distance away. This observation is correct although some present day spider books have misinformation, stating that the spider walks down one stem and up another to make the bridge (impossible according to W. Eberhard, pers. commun.). Lister recognized that the spider’s skills are innate, not learned. Lister speculates that skins of all later molts may be present in spiderlings from the start. Spiders feed on insects or each other and wasps prey on spi- ders. Lister described how orb-webs are made: the radii constructed first, from the middle to the periphery; the first spiral laid from the center out, the final spiral laid from outside in; sometimes a hole in the hub made at the end; the use of knots or glue to tie threads together. He contradicts 23 traditional views held by Aristotle, Pliny and his own contemporary, Moulfet. According to the editors. Lister’s cita- tions of old literature are not always correct. As Lister practiced medicine and published papers on medical matters, (although he must have spent all of his spare time watching spiders and snails), his comments on the use of spiders and webs as medicines might be of interest. How- ever, he provides only an unconvincing list with- out comments. He lists macerations for warding off fevers; spiders steeped in olive-oil or rose- water for earache; a wax salve from spiders ap- plied to the navel for hysteria, swelling of the spleen and boils; spiders from rosewater for ces- sation of lactation, gout, ringworm and other spreading skin diseases; cobwebs or their ash for stanching the flow of blood and for healing open sores and inflammations; spiders’ eggs from oil of spikenard applied to an aching tooth or for tertian fever. Lister wrote before double blind experiments were used to demonstrate efficacy. Lister tried to investigate venoms, and noted that spiders are not noxious when eaten. Each of the thirty-eight spiders he recorded for England and Wales (and considered to be all there were) is illustrated and described in about two pages, including habitat and life history infor- mation. The spiders are also grouped in a table according to the type of web made and the num- ber of eyes. The editors have matched Lister’s spiders with species known from the area, and have assigned them their present day Linnaean binomials. The editors comment on how they matched the name to each of the Lister species, but if Lister differentiated only one species of a genus (e.g., Tetragnatha), I wonder whether he might have mixed observations from several species he did not differentiate. Was the spider fauna in Lister’s time the same as today when the population of England is nearly 1 0 times larg- er? Lister’s detailed descriptions and numbering 227 228 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY of spiders are in marked contrast to the skimpy work of some authors of the 1 8th and early 1 9th century, who gave names accompanied by one sentence descriptions. These later works have led to subjective interpretation of species names, which is the reason that strict priority of names in spiders and other invertebrates does not nec- essarily lead to stable nomenclature. Lister was a friend of John Ray and other no- tables of the era, and these friendships were maintained partly through correspondence. The editors looked through surviving correspon- dence in British archives and reproduced ex- cerpts dealing with spiders. The letters, written in English with inconsistent 17th century spell- ing, are here produced in readable modem En- glish, with a plate showing a reproduction of an original letter. Even in the 17th century there were nasty dis- putes. Did Martin Lister or Edward Hulse make the first observation of spiders emitting gossamer and sailing through the air? It seems that Lister was the first to make the observation, but Hulse got ahead to publish. Unlike later authors. Lister used alcohol as a preservative and he reports that green coloration washed out. In England as late as the 1870’s spiders were still speared and dried on insect pins. This translation into modem English uses modem anatomical terms. The editing is superb. Present day ethologists should check this volume before making statements on who made a first spider observation. Nowhere did I find that he used palpi to dif- ferentiate species. The repeated statement that males are distinguished by their palpi refers to differentiating males from females. This was the first time that I examined the 1778 German translation in the Harvard Uni- versity Library. It differs by having a list of pre- 1778 publications about spiders. Names have been attached to the species for which Lister had assigned numbers, and these binomial names are preceded by “List.” or “Lister”; reference is made to Linnaeus in footnotes. Also, additional infor- mation and plates are provided; such additional information is followed by the abbreviation G., (for the junior editor). In Roewer’s catalog ( 1 942) and in Bonnet (1955) some of these names are assigned to Lister rather than to the editors Mar- tini & Goeze; some I could not find. These old names are probably all synonyms and hom- onyms; the less said about them, the better. LITERATURE CITED Bonnet, P. 1955. Bibliographia Araneorum, Tou- louse, 2:1-918. Martini, F. H. W. & Goeze, J. A. E. 1778. Martin Listers Naturgeschichte der Spinnen iiberhaupt und der Engellandischen Spinnen insonderheit aus dem Lateinischen iibersetzt und mit Anmerkungen ver- mehrt. Quedlinburg und Blankenburg. 302 pp., 5 pi. Roewer, C. F. 1942. Katalog der Araneae von 1758 bis 1940. Bremen, 1:1-1040. Herbert W. Levi: Museum of Comparative Zo- ology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mas- sachusetts 02138, USA. Manuscript received 31 October 1992. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Manuscripts are preferred in English but may be accepted in Spanish, French or Portuguese subject to availability of appropriate reviewers. Authors whose primary language is not English, may consult the Associate Editor for assistance in obtaining help with English manuscript preparation. All man- uscripts should be prepared in general accordance with the current edition of the Council of Biological Editors (CBE) Style Manual unless instructed otherwise below. Authors are ad- vised to consult a recent issue of the Journal of Arachnology for additional points of style. Send three identical copies of the typed material together with copies of illustrations to: Gary L. Miller, Associate Editor The Journal of Arachnology Department of Biology The University of Mississippi University, Mississippi 38677 USA Telephone: (601) 232-7495 FAX: (601) 232-5144 Bitnet: BYMILLER@UMSVM Correspondence relating to manuscripts should also be di- rected to the Associate Editor. Manuscripts longer than 1 500 words should be prepared as Feature Articles, shorter papers as Research Notes. FEATURE ARTICLES Title page.— Place in the upper left comer the complete name, address, and telephone number of the author with whom proofs and correspondence should be exchanged. Include FAX num- bers and Bitnet addresses if available. Four lines below, type the title, centered, all in capital letters. Another four lines be- low, beginning with the left margin, type each author’s name on a new line followed by the address. Abstract.— The heading should be placed at the beginning of the first paragraph set off by a period. In articles written in English, a second abstract in an acceptable language may be included pertinent to the nationality of the author(s) or geo- graphic region(s) emphasized in the article. A second abstract in English must be included in articles not written in the latter language. Text.— Double-space text, tables, legends, etc. throughout. Three levels of heads are used. The first level (METHODS, RESULTS, etc.) is typed in capitals and on a separate line. The second level head begins a paragraph with an indent and is separated from the text by a period and a dash. The third level may or may not begin a paragraph but is underscored and separated from the text by a colon. Use only the underline method to indicate italics; DO NOT USE WORD PROCES- SOR ITALICS CODES. Use the metric system unless quoting text or referencing collection data. All decimal fractions are indicated by the period regardless of language of the text. Citation of references in the text.— Include within parenthe- ses the surnames of the author(s) followed by the date of pub- lication. A comma separates multiple citations by the same author(s) and a semicolon separates citations by different au- thors, e.g., (Smith 1970), (Jones 1988; Smith 1989), (Smith 1986, 1987; Smith & Jones 1989; Jones et al. 1989). Literature cited section.— Use the following style: Lombardi, S. J. & D. L. Kaplan. 1990. The amino acid composition of major ampullate gland silk (dragline) of Ne- phila clavipes (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J. Arachnol., 18: 297-306. Krafit, B. 1982. The significance and complexity of com- munication in spiders. Pp. 1 5-66, In Spider Communica- tions: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance. (P. N. Witt & J. S. Rovner, eds.). PrincetonUniversity Press, Princeton. Footnotes.— Footnotes are only permitted on the first printed page to indicate current address or other information con- cerning the author(s). All footnotes are placed together on a separate manuscript page. Running head.— Author sumame(s) and an abbreviated title must be typed all in caps and must not exceed 60 characters and spaces. The running head is placed by itself on a separate manuscript page. Taxonomic articles.— Consult a recent taxonomic article in the Journal of Arachnology for style or contact the Associate Editor. Tables.— Each table, with the legend above, should be placed on a separate manuscript page. Only the appropriate horizontal lines should be included. Use no footnotes; instead, include all information in the legend. Make notations in the text mar- gins to indicate the preferred location of tables in the printed text. Illustrations.— Original art work should be kept by the au- thor(s) until final acceptance for publication. All art work must be mounted on stiff board ready for reproduction. In line draw- ings, pay particular attention to width of lines and size of lettering when reductions are to be made by the printer. Mul- tiple photos assembled on a single plate should be mounted with only a minimum of space separating them. In the case of multiple illustrations mounted together, each illustration must be numbered sequentially rather than given an alphabetic se- quence. Written on the back should be the name(s) of author(s) and an indication of top edge. The author should indicate whether the figure should be one column or two columns in width. The overall dimensions should be no more than 1 1 inches (28 cm) x 14 inches (36 cm). Larger drawings present greater difficulty in shipping and greater risks of damage for which the JOA assumes no responsibility. The author is en- couraged to consider PMT (PhotoMechanical Transfer) repro- ductions for large drawings and to consult an Editor for details on appropriate reductions. Make notations in the text margins to indicate the preferred position of illustrations in the printed text. Legends for illustrations should be placed together on the same page(s) and separate from the illustrations. Adhere to the following styles; Figures 1-4.— A-us x-us, male from Timbuktu: 1, left leg; 2, right chelicera; 3, dorsal aspect of genitalia; 4, ventral aspect of abdomen. Figures 27-34.— Right chelicerae of species of A-us from Timbuktu: 27, 29, 3 1 , 33, dorsal views; 28, 30, 32, 34, prolater- al views of moveable finger; 27, 28, A-us x-us, holotype male; 29, 30, A-us, w-us, holotype male; 31, 32, A-us z-us, holotype male; 33, 34, A-us y-us, male. Scales = 1.0 mm. Assemble manuscript for mailing.— Assemble the separate sections or pages in the following sequence; title page, abstract, text, figure legends, footnotes, running head, tables with leg- ends, figures. Page charges and reprints.— The current charge per journal page will be assessed as follows: $50— nonmembers, $45 — members with grant, institutional, or other support for page costs; $25 — regular members who do not have support for page costs; $20— student members who do not author with full members and who do not have support. Reprints are available only from the printer at current costs. Waiver of Page Charges.- The Editor will consider requests for a waiver of page charges for manuscripts which have been accepted for publication. Requests should be made in writing and should be submitted to the Associate Editor along with the final revision of the manuscript. The author must certify that neither grant nor institutional funds are available to cover all of the publication costs. The Society will normally agree to waive up to a maximum of 80% of the page charges, contingent on the availability of funds; the author is expected to find alternative sources for the remainder. RESEARCH NOTES Instructions above pertaining to feature articles apply also to research notes except that abstracts and most headings are not used and the byline follows the Literature Cited section. CONTENTS THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY VOLUME 20 Feature Articles NUMBER 3 Spider (Araneae) taxa associated with Mantispa viridis (Neuroptera: Man- tispidae) Jeffrey R. Bmshwein, Kevin M. Hoffman, and Joseph D. Culin 153 Life cycle and habitat preference of the facultatively arboreal wolf spider, Gladicosa pulchra (Araneae, Lycosidae) Micky D. Eubanks and Gary L. Miller 157 Abundance and association of cursorial spiders from calcareous fens in southern Missouri Thomas L. Bultman 165 Web orientation, thermoregulation, and prey capture efficiency in a tropical forest spider Leslie Bishop and Sean R. Connolly 173 Numerical response to prey abundance by Zygiella x-notata (Araneae, Ar- aneidae) David A. Spiller 179 A new species of North American tarantula, Aphonopelma paloma (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Theraphosidae) Thomas R. Prentice 189 Sex ratio in the social spider Diaea socialis (Araneae: Thomisidae) David M. Rowell and Barbara York Main 200 Survivorship of wolf spiders (Lycosidae) reared on different diets George W. Uetz, Jennifer Bischoff, and Joseph Raver 207 Antipredator benefits of single- and mixed-species grouping by Nephila cla- vipes (L.) (Araneae, Tetragnathidae) Margaret A. Hodge and George W. Uetz 212 Dispersal of the spiderlings of Xysticus emertoni (Araneae, Thomisidae), a litter-dwelling crab spider Douglass H. Morse 217 Courtship behavior and sexual cannibalism in the semi-aquatic fishing spi- der, Dolomedes fimbriatus (Clerck) (Araneae: Pisauridae) Gdran Arnqvist 222 Book Review Martin Lister’s English Spiders, 1678 (translated by Malcolm Davies and Basil Harley, edited by John Parker and Basil Harley) Herbert W. Levi 111 23 SI XI ffi/93 98115 (X m II NviNOSHiiws saiHvaan libraries Smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi nvinoshj S SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOliniliSNI NVINOSHilWS S3IBVdan LIBRARIES SMITHSOI (/> 2 V 2: ^ ^ w z ...(/> < s < S ,< I . c/> ^ > 2 'CLS^ > ■'^ur’ 5 > 2 cn z £/) Z {/) *. Z ji NviNOSHilws S3 1 a va an libraries Smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi nvinosh — CO ^ (/) CO — O S^SMITHS0NIAN”‘|NSTITUTI0N NOliDiliSNl'^NVlNOSHiltMS S3iavaan LIBRARI ES^SMITHSO 2 [I ^ [I ' ^ 2 O r-r, 5 xCtTsfirlyX ® O m ^ m I ;; ±. CO £ CO £ CO _ II NviNosHims S3iavaan libraries Smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi nvinosh 2 ^2 ^ 5 ^ ^ ^ ^ 2 » ‘z’ 2: - ^ ^ ^ 2 -H Wy/zmj:, ? =< z ^ J^Y A' ^ z 'KW^AJJK UJ cc < ex CQ S 5 • W > CO 2 CO '2 CO '" 2 CO S SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI_ NVINOSHillAIS S3iavaan LIBRARIES SMITHSO <0 — CO 2 \ ^ ^ CO liJ Xrt^TiroX /ft V UJ II NVINOSHillAIS S3 lava an libraries SMITHSONIAN institution NOlinillSNI nvinosh 2 r- z r- ra 50 > m ^ m ^ m ^ m co^. £ CO £ CO £ CO S SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOliniliSNI NVINOSHIIINS S3iavaan LIBRARIES SMITHSC CO 2 V CO 2 CO 2 -.• CO 2 . < 2 , < 2 =5 .. o:/ ' g CO X X o > 5 x^;v_Dc/ j, 2 > JI NviNOSHiiiMs'^ss I ava a n libraries^^smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi nvinosh — CO ~ CO ^ CO — to Q O xic^pc^ O S^SMITHSONIAN'^INSTITUTION NOliniliSNI "^NVINOSHIIINS S3iavaan~'LIBRARI ES^SMITHSC 2 [3 2 r- , 2 r- 2 , “ mr "' ' ^ _ z _j z iiyvaan libraries Smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi nvinoshiiws ssiuvuan r- 2 r- ^ z r- z 2 . vtxj 2 m 2 t 1 ■ » s I (fl zz Ui — (J) STITUTION NOlinillSNI NVINOSHilWS S3iavaan LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION fn Z ^ W 2! =; ../ -I .,y../ Ay,. Z .v«V^v -1 2 i n a va a LI b rar i Es‘^SMiTHS0NiAN^iNSTiTUTi0N'^N0iiniiiSNi^NviN0SHiiws‘^s3 1 ava a n //\ f/) •“ tfi o: < .IXilK-V :: VcSWPy m g ='■%'« STITUTION ^NOIiniliSNl“'NVlNOSHilUS^S 3 lavaan'^LIBRARI ES^SMITHS0N1AN~'|NST1TUTI0N 2 r- , 2 r- 2 O ^^Tt-TiriTN. vv O xt^jSTiriT^ ia O _ {/) “ tn E (/i 1 1 ava an libraries smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi NViNOSHims S3iavaan to Z * to 2 to J, ^ J, - 2 > STITUTION ‘^N0liniliSNl_NVIN0SHillAIS^S3 I a Va a n_LI B RAR 1 es^^smithsonian^institution _ V -X-5NJS. < (N y 03 aiavaan libraries smithsonian institution NoiiniiisNi nvinoshiiws S3iavaan 2 r- Z r- z (/} — ^ ~ O >s^"l D>-^ Q ISTITUTION N0liniliSNI~'NVIN0SHillMS^S3 I avaan~^LIBRARI ES^SMITHSONIAN“'lNSTITUTION X r- , z r- Z O v^TtrlrTTN. O ><^Tir77S^ — ,,^7^ r>-^ O