\' THE JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOR VOLUME 7, 1917 EDITORIAL BOARD Madison Bentley Edward L. Thorndike University of Illinois Teachers College, Columbia University Gilbert V. Hamilton Margaret F. Washburn Frazysburg, Ohio Vassar College Samuel J. Holmes John B. Watson The University of California The Johns Hopkins University Walter S. Hunter William M. Wheeler The University of Kansas Harvard University Harvey A. Carr, The University of Chicago Editor of Reviews Robert M. Yerkes, University of Minnesota Managing Editor Published Bi-monthly at Cambridge, Boston, Mass. HENRY HOLT & COMPANY 34 West 33d Street, New York G. E. STECHERT & CO., London, Paris and Leipzig, Foreign Agents Entered as second-ciass matter March 7, 1911, at the post-office at Cambridge, Boston, Massachusetts, under the act of March 3, 1879 CONTENTS OF VOLUME 7, 1917 Number 1, January-February pages Hess, Carl von. New experiments on the light reactions of plants and animals 1-10 Yerkes, Robert M. Methods of exhibiting reactive tenden- cies characteristic of ontogenetic and phylogenetic stages. . 11-28 Reese, A. M. Light reactions of the crimson-spotted newt, Diemyctylus z'iridcsccns 29-48 Hunter, Walter S., assisted by Yarbrough, Jos. U. The in- terference of auditory habits in the white rat 49-65 Lashley, K. S. The criterion of learning in experiments with the maze 66-70 Cole, William H. The reactions of Drosophila ampelophila Loew to gravity, centrif ligation, and air currents 71-80 Olmsted, J. M. D. Geotropism in Planaria maculata 81-86 Financial statement for 1916. Number 2, March-April Yarbrough, Joseph U. The delayed reaction with sound and light in cats 87-1 10 Utsurikawa, Nenozo. Temperamental differences between outbred and inbred strains of the albino rat 111-129 Hubbert, Helen B., and Lashley, K. S. Retroactive asso- ciation and the elimination of errors in the maze 130-138 Lashley, K. S. A causal factor in the relation of the distribu- tion of practice to the rate of learning 139-142 Rau, Phil. The courtship of Pieris protodice 143-144 Number 3, May-June Carr, Harvey. The distribution and elimination of errors in the maze 145-159 Reeves, Cora D. Moving and still lights as stimuli in a discrimination experiment with white rats 160-168 /3/73 CONTENTS iii PAGES Pearce, Binnie D. A note on the interference of visual habits in the white rat 169-177 Lashley, K. S. Modifiability of the preferential use of the hands in the rhesus monkey 178-186 Baldwin, Francis Marsh. Diurnal activity of the earthworm 187-190 Number 4, July-August Stephens, T. C. The feeding of nestling birds 191-206 Hussey, Roland F. A study of the reactions of certain birds to sound stimuli 207-219 Schaeffer, A. A. Choice of food in ameba 220-258 Carr, Harvey. Maze studies with the white rat. I. Normal animals 259-275 Number 5, September-October Carr, Harvey. Maze studies with the white rat. II. Blind animals 277-294 Carr, Harvey. Maze studies with the white rat. III. Anos- mic animals 295-306 McColloch, James W. and Yuasa, H. Notes on the migra- tion of the Hessian fly larvae 307-323 Shadall, Elsa. Reactions of.Opalina ranarum 324-333 Yoakum, C. S. Similar behavior in cow and man with a note on emotion 334-337 Peterson, Joseph. Frequency and recency factors in maze learning by white rats 338-364 Carr, Harvey. The alternation problem. A preliminary study 365-384 Announcement to subscribers 385 Number 6, November-December Wells, Morris M. The behavior of limpets with particular reference to the homing instinct 387-395 Taliaferro, W. H. Literature for 1916 on the behavior of the lower invertebrates 396-404 Turner, C. H. Literature for 1916 on the behavior of spiders and insects other than ants 405-419 iv CONTEXTS PAGES Wells, Morris M. Literature for 1916 on ants and Myrme- cophils 420-434 Vincent, Stella B. Literature for 1916 on the behavior of vertebrates 435-443 Craig, Wallace. On the ability of animals to keep time with an external rhythm 444-448 Carr, Harvey. Smith's " Mind in Animals " 449-450 Strong, R. M. Wood's " The Fundus Oculi of Birds " 451 Carr, Harvey. Holmes's "Animal Behavior " 452-453 Walcott, Charles D. Story of Granny, the mountain squirrel 454-455 Announcement to subscribers 456 Subject and Author Index VOLUME 7 Original contributions are marked by an asterisk (*) Adams, C. C. Ecology of invertebrates, 411, 415. *Albino rat, temperamental differences in, 111. Allard, H. A. Flashing in the firefly, 413, 415, 446, 448. Allee, W. C. Kheotaxis in Asellus, 396, 402. Allen, B. M. Behavior in the spiny lobster, 396, 402. *Alternation problem, 365. Amans. Locomotion in the cicadas, 413, 415. *Ameba, choice of food in, 220. Amphibians, literature on, 435. *Animals, reactions of, 1. *Anosmic animals, maze studies with, 295. Ant, literature on, 420. Ant pest, control of, 423. Arlitt, Ada H. Behavior in the chick, 441, 442. Ashworth, J. H. Hibernation in the fly, 411, 415. Back, E. A. Fruit fly, 414, 415. Bagg, Halsey J. Individual differ- ences, 441, 442. Baker. The green apple aphis, 406, 407, 409, 416. *Baldwin, Francis M. Diurnal activity of the earthworm 187. Barber, Ernest R. The Argentine ant, 420, 421, 422, 423, 425, 433. Barber, H. S. Migration of Myrapods, 412, 416. Barbey, A. Behavior in the beetle Cer- ambyx heros, 406, 416. Beebe, C. W. Fauna, 433. Belsing, S. W. Behavior in the pecan twig-girdler, 410, 416. Bingham, H. C. Reactions of the bird dog, 439, 442. *Bird, feeding in the, 191; ^reactions of the, to sound stimuli, 207; literature on, 436. Blackman, M. W. Habits of Pityogenes hoplinsoni Ewaine 416. Blair, K. G. Luminous insects, 446, 448. *Blind animals, maze studies with, 277. Bovie, W. T. Schumann rays, 396, 402. Brittain, W. E. Feeding habits of Bepressaria heraclina, 406, 416; fly as a disease carrier, 413, 416. Brun, R. Orientation in the ant, 427, 433. Buddenbrock, W. von. Tropism theory, 396, 402. Burtt, Harold E. Behavior in the white rat, 440, 442. Cary, L. B. Sense organs of Cassiopea xamachana, 396, 402. *Carr, Harvey. Distribution and elimina- tion of errors in the maze, 145; *maze studies with normal white rats, 259; *maze studies with blind white rats, 277; *maze studies with anosmic white rats, 295; *the alternation problem, 365; *Smith's "Mind in Animals," 449; *Holmes's "Animal Behavior," 452. *Cat, delayed reaction in, 87. Chidester, F. E. The painted turtle, 416. Churchill, E. P., Jr. Learning in the goldfish, 440, 442. Clausen, C. P. Behavior in Coccinelli- dae, 406, 416. Coad, B. R. Hibernation in the weevil, 411, 416. Cockle, J. W. Habits of Lepidoptera, 416. *Cole, William H. Beactions of Droso- phila, 71. Cooke, Mills W. Bird migration, 438, 442. Cory, E. N. The Columbine leaf miner, 406, 416. Cosens, A. Hibernation in the lady-bird beetle, 411, 416. Cotton, E. C. Life history of the Amer- ican fever tick, 416. Coupin, H. Paper-making insects, 416. *Courtship, in Pieris protodice, 143. VI INDEX Cowan, Edwina A. Behavior in the chick, 441, 442. Craig, Wallace. Rhythmic activities of animals, 437, 442, 446, 448; *rhythm in animals, 444. Crawley, W. C. Ants, 421, 425, 427, 428, 433; notes on Myrmecophily, 424, 433. Crozier, W. J. Behavior of Holothuria captiva, 396, 402; pulsation of the cloaca of Holothur- ians, 396, 402; behavior of the barnacle Conchoderma virgatum, 397, 402; coloration of nudibranchs, 397, 402 ; chemical sense in vertebrates, 435, 442. Cummins, B. F. The louse as a disease spreader, 413, 416. Cushman, E. A. Behavior in the apple red-bug, 406, 416. Cutaneous sensitivity, literature on, 435. Davis. Life history of Corpus uni- punctata, 406, 416. *Delayed reaction, in the cat, 87. Demuth. Wintering of the bee, 414, 418. Dolley, W. L. Reactions to light in Vanessa antipoa, 416. Donisthorpe, H. A new species of ant, 426, 433. Donisthorpe, J. K. Literature on Myrmecophily, 424, 425, 426, 427. 433. Dove, W. E. Hibernation in the house- fly, 411, 416. Dow, R. P. Insect burrows, 415, 416. *Drosophila, reactions of, 71. DuPorte, E. Melville. Death feigning in Tychius picirostris, 412, 416. * T_> arthworm, diurnal activity in, 187. JLv Ecology, literature on, 411. Essig, E. O. A coccid-feeding moth, 406, 416. Esterly, Calvin O. Feeding habits of copepods, 397, 402. Evans, A. T. Breeding in the house- fly, 409, 416. * C* eeding, in nestling birds, 191 ; literature on, 406. Felt, E. P. Habits of the codling moth, 407, 416. Fish, literature on, 435. Fitzsimmons, F. W. The house-fly and disease, 413, 416. Fletcher, John A. Behavior of the chick, 441, 442. *Fly larvae, migration in, 307. Forbes, S. A. Habits of the' Northern corn root-worm, 416. Foucher, G. Orthoptera, 416. Fracker, S. B. Behavior in Lach- nosterna, 406, 418. Frison, T. H. Habits of Psithyrus variablis, 416. Frost, S. W. Biological notes on Ceuto- rhync.hus marginatus, 417. Furness, William H. Mentality of the monkey, 440, 442. Gaige, F. M. Swarming in the ant, 428, 434. *Geotropism, in Planaria maculata, 81. Gibson, Arthur. Control of ants, 424, 434. Godderham. Feeding of Depressaria heraclina, 406, 416. Good, C. A. The apple maggot parasite, 413, 417. Goodale, H. D. Behavior of the capon, 439, 442. Graham-Smith, G. S. Parasites of the common fly, 413, 417. Grave, C. Feeding in the oyster, 397, 402. *TJabit, in the white rat, 49. *formation, in the white rat, 169. Hamilton, G. V. Reactions of primates, 440, 442. Harris, J. A. Habits of the beetle Bruclius, 409, 417. Hayes, W. P. Life history of the maize bill-bug, 406, 409, 417. Herrera, M. .Intelligence in the insect, 417. Herrick, G. W. Life history of the cherry-leaf beetle, 406, 417. *Hess, Carl von. Reactions of plants and animals, 1. Hibernation, literature on, 411. Hilton, W. A. Reactions of the rare whip scorpion, 417. Hindle, Edward. Flies and disease, 413, 417. Hodge, C. F. Control of flies, 417. Holloway, T. E. Phototropism experi- ments, 405, 417. Holmes, S. J. "Animal Behavior," 452. Homing instinct, in limpets, 387. Horton. Anti-ant bands, 424, 428, 434. Howat, I. Effect of nicotine on the frog, 438, 442. *Hubbert, Helen B. Elimination of errors in the maze, 130. INDEX vn Hungerford, H. B. Behavior of the Sciara maggot, 406, 417. *Hunter, Walter S. Habits in the white rat, 49. Hunting behavior, literature on 406. *Hussey, Boland F. Reactions of birds to sound stimuli, 207. Hutchison, E. H. Mating in the house- fly, 407, 417. Hyslop, J. A. The host of Zelia verte- brata, 417; habits of Horistonotus uhlerii, 417. * [ nbred rat, compared with outbred, 111. 1 Insect, literature on, 405. Instinct, homing, 387; literature on, 438. Invertebrates, literature on, 396. Johnson, H. M. Visual discrimination in vertebrates, 436, 442. Jordon, H. Nervous system of certain holothurians, 397, 402. Kanda, S. Geotropism in animals, 397, 398, 402. Keilin, D. Studies on Diptera Larva, 417. Keith, E. D. The ghost moth, 417. Kellogg, F. M. Response of the earth- worm, 400, 403. Kellogg, J. L. Opinions on ciliary activities, 397, 402. Kempf, E. J. Behavior of a monkey, 440, 442; learning in the monkey, 440, 442. Kenoyer, L. A. Pollination in insects, 414, 417. King, J. L. Life history of Pterodontia flavipes, 413, 417. King, W. V. Anopheles punctipennis and disease, 413, 417. Knab, F. Weevil larvae, 417; behavior of Dermatobia hominis, 409, 417. Lankester, E. R. Behavior of Fora- minifera, 398, 402. *Lashley, K. S. Learning in maze ex- periments, 66; *elimination of errors in the maze, 130; *relation of practice to rate of learn- ing, 139; *use of the hands in the rhesus mon- key, 178; free-swimming Paramoecia, 399, 403; color vision in the bird, 436, 443; homing activities in the bird, 438, 443. Laurent, Philip. Flashing in the fire- fly, 446, 448. *Learning, relation of practice to rate of, 139. Legendre, J. The mosquito, 417. Leng, C. W. Notes on Cychrissi, 417. Letisimulation, literature on, 412. Lewis, E. M. Relation of body tempera- ture to that of an animal's environ- ment, 400, 404. *Light, reaction to, in the cat, 87. Limpet, behavior in, 387; literature on, 387. Loeb, J. Heliotropic reactions of ani- mals and plants, 398, 403. Lohner, L. Feeding experiments on the leech, 398, 403. Lyne, W. H. Life history of the cod- dling moth, 417. Mammals, literature on, 435. Mann, W. M. The Brazilian ant, 421, 425, 426, 432, 433, 434. Marlatt, C. L. House ant, 420, 424, 434. Mast, S. O. Feeding of Amoeba on In- fusoria, 399, 403; feeding of Amoeba on Rotifers, 399, 403; free-swimming Paramoecia, 399, 403 ; orientation in Gonium pectorale, 399, 403. Maternal behavior, literature on, 409. Matheson. Life history of the cherry leaf beetle, 417. Mating, literature on, 407. Maupas, E. Copulation of nematodes, 399, 403. Mayer, A. G. Nerve conduction in Cas- siopea, 399, 403. a theory of nerve conduction, 399, 403. *Maze, experiments with, 66; *elimination of errors in, 130; *distribution and elimination of errors in, 145; * studies with the white rat, 259, 277, 295; *learning, in the white rat, 338. McAfee, W. L. Behavior of tiger beetle, 425, 434. *McColIoch, James W. Migration of fly larvae, 307. MeDermott, F. A. Flashing in the fire- fly, 445, 446, 448. McGregor, E. A. The privet mite, 406, 409, 417. Mclndoo, N. E. The coccinellid beetle, 412, 417. Memory, literature on, 414. Mendelssohn, M. Behavior of the leuco- cyte, 399, 403. Metalnikov, S. Behavior of Protozoa, 399, 403. Vlll INDEX Meyers, Gr. C. Learning in the pig, 440, ' 443. Migration, literature on, 412. Miller, J. M. Behavior of Megastigmus spermotropus, 409, 418. •Monkey, use of the hands in, 178. Montane, L. A Cuban chimpanzee, 439, 443. Moore, A. R. Response of the earth- worm, 400, 403; orientation in Gonium, 400, 403. Morse, E. S. Flashing in the firefly, 413, 417, 446, 448. Muller, H. R. Falling reflex in the cat, 437, 443. Myrmecophils, literature on, 420. Nesbit, W. Behavior of wild animals, 442, 443. Xewman, H. H. Behavior of Phalangi- dae, 444, 448. *Newt, light reactions of, 29. Xininger, H. H. Life history of the bee, 418. *t \ Imsted, J. M. D. Geotropism in \J Planaria maculata, 81. *Opalina ranarum, reactions of, 324. Orchymont, A. de. Respiration in the insect, 413, 418. Orientation in the ant, 427. Osborn H. Life history of the leaf hopper, 406, 411, 418. Osburn, R. C. Migration in the dragon- fly, 412, 418. *Outbred rat, compared with inbred, 111. Packard, C. W. Life history of the Hessian fly parasite, 413, 415, 418. Paddock, F. B. Observations on the turnip louse, 406, 418. Parker, G. H. Reactions and structure of the sea anemone, 400, 403 ; structure of Metridium, 400, 403. Parker, R. R. Migration of the house- fly, 413, 418. Patch, E. M. Ecology of the aphid, 412, 418. Patten, B. M. Effect of age on the blowfly larva, 418. Payne, O. G. M. Life history of Tele- phones literatus, 413, 418. Peairs, L. M. Behavior of web-worm larvae, 445, 448. *Pearce, Binnie D. Interference of vis- ual habits in the white rat, 169. Pellett, F. C. Habits of Polistes metri- cus, 410, 418. Pemberton. Effect of temperature on the fruit fly, 414, 415. *Peterson, Joseph. Factors in learning by the white rat, 338; tone perception in the rat, 435, 443; completeness of response, 441, 443. Phillips. Outdoor wintering of the bee, 414, 418. Pictet, A. Locomotion in the insect, 405, 418. Pierce, W. D. Habits in the weevil, 409, 41S; effects of temperature on the insect, 414, 418. *Pieris protodice, courtship of, 143. -Planaria maculata, geotropism in, 81. *Plants, reactions of, 1. Rabaud, E. Death-feigning reflex in the insect, 400, 403. Rasmussen, A. T. Hibernation, 439 443. Rau, Xellie. Behavior of the solitary bee, 408, 409, 415, 418; biology of the mud-dauber wasp, 409, 413, 418; sleep in the insect, 414, 418. *Rau, Phil. The courtship of Pieris pro- todice, 143; behavior of the solitary bee, 408, 409, 415, 418; biology of the mud-dauber wasp, 409, 413, 418; sleep in the insect, 414, 418. *Reactive tendencies, methods of ex- hibiting, 11. *Reese, A. M. Light reactions of the crimson-spotted newt, 29. *Reeves, Cora D. Discrimination experi- ment with the white rat, 160. Reuter. Effect of sound on animals, 435, 443. Rhythm, ability of animals to keep time with, 444;- literature on, 444. Richardson, C. H. Attraction of Dip- tera to ammonia, 405, 418 ; chemotropie response of the house- fly, 405, 418. Roberg, D. N. The family Phoridae and disease, 413 418. Robinson, A. Behavorism, 442, 443. Roeber, J. Vision in insects, 418. Rogers, C. G. Relation of temperature of animals to that of their en- vironment, 400, 404. Rohwer, S. A. Mating of the saw-fly, 407, 418. INDEX IX Root, F. M. Feeding of animals on rotifers, 399, 403; feeding of animals in Infusoria, 399, 403. Euggles. Insects and disease, 413, 419. Eunner, G. A. The cigarette beetle, 418; effects of roentgen rays on the beetle, 405, 418. Sanders, J. G. Behavior in Lachno- sterna, 406, 418. Satterwait. Life hifctory of Corpus unipunctata, 406, 416. Sayle, M. H. Eeactions of Necturus, 436, 443. *Schaeffer, A. A. Choice of food in Ameba, 220; feeding in Ameba, 400, 404; behavior in Ameba, 401, 404. Schoene, W. J. Feeding in the seed- corn maggot, 406, 418; biology of the P. brassicae, 406, 418. Seurat, L. G. Copulation of nematodes, 399, 403. Sell, E. A. Notes on the 12-spotted cucumber beetle, 407, 411, 414, 419; migration in the beetle, 419; behavior of a Western flower beetle, 419. *Shadall, Elsa. Eeactions of Opalina ranarum, 324. Shannon, H. J. Migration in insects and birds, 413, 419. Sleeping behavior, literature on, 414. Smith, E. M. < ' Mind in Animals, ' ' 449. Smith, H. S. Habits of parasitic Hy- menoptera, 409, 419. Smith, M. E. South Carolina ants, 425, , 428, 433, 434. Snyder, T. E. Behavior of termites, 408, 409, 419, 430, 432, 434; white ants, 421, 434. Somes, M. P. Mating in Solarium caro- linensis L., 407, 419. *Sound, reaction of the cat to, 87; *reaction of the bird to, 207; literature on, 435. Spider, literature on, 405. Squirrel, a mountain, 454. *Stephens, T. C. Feeding of nestling birds, 191. *Strong, E. M. Wood's "The Fundus Oculi of Birds," 451. Studhalter. Insects and disease, 413, 419. Swarming, in the ant, 428. Swift, W. B. Developmental psychology in lower animals, 442, 443. Swynnerton, C. F. M. Experiments on insects, 419. *rT* aliaf erro, W. H. Behavior of the 1 lower invertebrates, 396. Technique, literature on, 415. Theobald, Fred V. Literature on aphi- didae, 425, 434. Tillyard, B. J. Behavior in the dragon- fly, 419. Titus, E. G. Structure of Metridium, 400, 403. Torrey, H. B. Physiological analysis of behavior, 401, 404. Tower, D. G. Feeding in Cirphis uni- punctata, 407, 419. Townsend, C. H. T. Insects and dis- ease, 413, 419. Tropisms, literature on, 405. * Turner, C. H. Behavior of spiders and insects, 405; behavior in the spider, 407, 410, 419; mating in Lasius niger L., 408, 419; feeding in the false spider, 419. Turner, C. L. Breeding in Orthoptera, 408, 409, 415, 419. Turner. Feeding in the green apple aphis, 406, 407, 409, 416. Urbahns, T. D. Life history of Haoro- cytus medicagnis, 409, 419. *Utsurikawa, Nenozo. Temperamental differences in albino rats, 111. Vertebrates, literature on, 435. *Vincent, Stella B. Behavior of vertebrates, 435. *Vision, in the white rat, 169; literature on, 436. * 11 7 alcott, Charles D. Story of Granny, VV the mountain squirrel, 454. Walton, A. C. Eeactions of Paramoe- cium caudatum to light, 401, 404. Warren, A. Feeding in the Hawaiian dragonfly, 406, 419. Wasteneys, H. Heliotropic reactions of animals and plants, 398, 403. Watson, J. B. Spectral sensitivities of birds, 437, 443; the conditioned reflex, 437, 443. homing activities of birds, 438, 443. Watson, J. E. Life history of Anti- carsia gemmatiUs, 406, 407, 419. Weed, L. H. Falling reflex in the cat, 437, 443. Wiedman, F. D. Parasitism in the mon- key, 413, 419. Welch, P. S. Behavior in Lepidoptera, 411, 412, 419. X INDEX *Wells, Morris M. Behavior of limpets, 387; *literature on ants and Myrmeeophils, 420. Wenrich, D. H. Reactions in the mol- lusk. 401, 404. "Wheeler, W. M. The tropical ant Pliei- dole feregrina, 423, 434; the Indian ant Triglyphothrix stria- tidens, 423, 434; the "Western Amazon ant, 428, 430, 434; marriage flight of the bull-dog ant, 429, 434; the Australian ant, 434; a blind worker ant, 434; a phosphorescent ant, 434; behavior in Phalangidae, 444, 447, 448. •White rat, auditory habits in, 49; •discrimination experiments with, 160; -vision in, 169; *maze studies with the normal, 259 ; *ma'ze studies with the blind, 277; *maze studies with the anosmic, 295; *maze learning in, 338. Whitmarsh, E. D. Life history of Apa- teticus cynicus, 406, 409, 419. Williams, F. X. Life history in Meth- oca stygia, 410, 419. "Willis, 11. 8. Behavior in Amoeba, 402, 404. "Winn, A. F. Heliotropism in the but- terfly, 405, 419. Wood, Casey A. ' ' The Fundus Oculi of Birds," 451. Yarbrough, Joseph U. Auditory habits in the white rat, 49; •delayed reaction in cats, 87. Yerkes, Ada W. Behavior in the albino rat, 441, 443. •Yerkes, Robert M. Methods of exhibit- ing reactive tendencies, 11 ; mental life of the monkey, 439, 443; ideational behavior in man and ani- mals, 440, 443; provision for the study of moneys and apes, 440, 443. •Yoakum, C. S. Similar behavior in cow and man, 334. •Yuasa, H. Migration of the fly larvae, 307. 'Vetek, J. Insects and disease, 413, 419. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOR Vol. 7 JANUARY-FEBRUARY No. 1 NEW EXPERIMENTS ON THE LIGHT REACTIONS OF PLANTS AND ANIMALS' CARL VON HESS I Gentlemen: Allow me, before the order of the day, to give a brief report of a discovery, which, though it stands only in loose relation to our theme, seems to me of general interest. I speak of the accommodation of the alciopids. The alciopid is, as you know, a nearly transparent pelagic annelid, whose comparatively highly developed eyes have been repeatedly the object of histological research. It was believed that muscular elements could be demonstrated anatomically in these eyes and on this supposition theories of the act of accom- modation were grounded. These theories can easily be proved mistaken, as the following shows; I will not further dwell on them. On account of the small size of the eyes the largest — which I was enabled to examine had a diameter of hardly 1 mm., — it had been considered heretofore impossible to attack the prob- lem of their accommodative changes experimentally. However, I was able, by laying the living and carefully iso- lated eyes on suitable electrodes, under seawater, and by ob- serving them through binocular lenses in a very strong light falling from above, to follow the changes caused by electric irritation, and thus to discover a most remarkable accommo- dative process, unique in the animal world. At another time I shall describe this process in detail, tonight I shall limit my description to the main facts. 1 A lecture before the Morphological Society of Munich, reported and trans- lated by Miss Hilda Lodeman. 2 CARL VON HESS If one views a fresh alciopid eye from in front, the surface surrounding the lens is seen to be threaded over with numerous fine silvery shining stripes, which have hitherto been mistakenly interpreted as muscles (Hesse). In fact these are structures which, like an iris, obstruct the passage of diffuse light into the eye; besides this, they make the eyes which are turned forward and downward, as invisible as possible to an enemy coming from below. They thus have the same effect as that which I some time ago proved to be the case with the silver sheen of fish. Just below the lens there is a spot in the very soft eye-wall which, one may observe, contracts when the eye is stimulated; all the other portions of the tegument remain motionless. The lens, when stimulated, moves forward perceptibly, it approaches the cornea, as one may perceive most readily by looking at the eye in profile. Herewith is proved that the alciopids have an active near accommodation; for, by the above-mentioned contraction the distance between the lens and the retina is increased, while the lens remains unchanged in form. The way in which the change in the location of the lens is brought about is most inter- esting: The alciopids are distinguished from all other animals with otherwise similarly constructed eyes, by possessing a double vitreous body. Directly back of the lens we find a viscous fluid which is distinctly separated from the posterior space of the vitreous body and adheres closely to the wTalls of the eye on all sides. At the lowest point of this front part of the vit- reous body the latter displays a curious ampulliform knob which is connected with the eye-water space by a canal and was form- erly interpreted as an auditory sac by zoologists, and at present is supposed to be a gland belonging to the vitreous body for the secretion of its substance. My experiments show the real use of this protuberance. It occupies exactly the spot in the eye- wall in which alone contractile elements are found; the muscles, contracted, press the lump together like a rubber bulb filled with liquid, thus forcing a part of its contents into the eye, and slightly pushing forward the lens which rests in a bowl-like groove in the front surface of the vitreous body. This is the second accommodative process among the inver- tebrates with which we have become acquainted ; the mechanism differs entirely from that which I have proved Cephalopods to NEW EXPERIMENTS ON LIGHT REACTIONS 3 possess. Our observations teach anew how greatly physiologi- cal experiment can aid us in the interpretation of histological discoveries. II Among the lightreactions of Echinodermata which I have newly discovered and upon which I shall make only a brief report tonight, a certain interest attaches to those of the star- fish, if for no other reason but that until now almost nothing of their sensitiveness to light was known. On the ground of anatomical research it was taken for granted that the familiar red points at the ends of their five arms were light receiving apparatus. Attempts to elucidate the question experimentally led to contradictory results. Some authors assert that those starfish which have an inclination to move toward the light cease showing this impulse after the tips of the arms with the " eyes " are cut off; according to other writers individuals thus mutilated still crawl to the light. In the course of systematic experiments I discovered the surprising fact that the feet of the Astropectinids are highly sensi- tive to light. If light is flashed on them their little feet, relaxed in the dark, are instantaneously jerked in and the widely opened ambulacral groove is closed along the whole of the lighted area, the flanking white spines shutting over the incurled little feet. This startling phenomenon, which I was able to record in a number of snapshots, gave me the opportunity of examining the differing effects of colored lights. As with all the hitherto thoroughly examined invertebrates, it was found that colored lights have similar or identical relative values for our starfish as for the totally color-blind human eye; red lights remain almost or quite without effect even when very strong, while green and blue lights have a much stronger effect than the red lights, even when the latter seem to our normal eyesight much darker than the former. I was able also to prove adaptive changes in these starfish and to carry out exact measurements during my observations. New and most remarkable light reactions in sea urchins were also disclosed. So far it had been known from experiments of Sarasin and Uexkull that some sea urchins raise their spine slightly when shaded from the light. More exact observations of their qualities of sight had not yet been made. I discovered 4 CARL VON HESS the following interesting phenomenon appertaining to Centro- stephanus longispinus. The animals have surrounding their abo- ral pole, 20 or 30 beautiful lilac colored, clublike processes about 3 mm. long, concerning which we knew hitherto only that they some- times move in rotation, at other times are quiescent. I noticed that if a specimen at rest was slightly shaded, for example, if one's hand were passed quickly between window and reservoir, the little clubs began to rotate in a most lively manner. Further experiment showed that in order to bring about such agitation an exceedingly slight lessening of the lighting suffices. If, for instance, the greater part of the light reaches the animal from a gray pasteboard held at the proper angle, and I replace this board with one which is only a little darker in shade, the clubs begin to rotate quickly. Even with this method it was possible to a certain degree to make determining measurements, and I was able by the further use of differently colored boards for the lighting again to show convincingly that these animals also behave like totally color-blind human beings brought under cor- responding conditions. Still more delicate, surprisingly exact measurements were made by using the method which I shall now describe. Ill Several writers have thought to deduce an argument against the experiments I have so far made with the qualities of sight in animals from the idea that I bring the " objective light-reac- tion " of animals into relation with the " subjective light sensa- tion " of man. For anyone to whom the science of color is fami- liar, this argument is easily controverted. Still it is evident that there is a great advantage in showing that the problem may be attacked from quite a new direction. Therefore in a new series of experiments on a large scale, I brought the light sensi- tiveness of animals into relation, not to the ' ' subjective light sensation " of human beings, but to the " objective light reac- tion " in the human eye, to the changes in the size of the pupil caused by light. This correlation was successful after I had made extended and rather difficult preparations, as follows: We know from former experiments of M. Sachs (1893) that the degree of contraction of the pupil caused by a colored light, the "motor irritative value" of a colored light, depends on the strength of luminosity in which the colored light is seen. Until now we lacked a practical method of comparing the changing NEW EXPERIMENTS ON LIGHT REACTIONS 5 size of the human pupil and the varying reactions to light in the lower animals. Here you see an apparatus2 which I con- structed for this purpose and which does excellent service also in examining physiological and pathological changes in the human pupil. Of this use of the instrument I shall speak else- where in detail. At present it shall be described only in so far as it serves in the solution of the problems in comparative physi- ology now before us. With the aid of a proper system of lenses, and placed at a certain distance from it, a Nernst lamp illu- mines very strongly and evenly a circular space. In front of the first lens there is a movable double frame which by a lever arrangement enables one to light this circular space first by a physically exactly determined colored glass light, and imme- diately thereafter, without intermediate lighting, by a mensur- able variable light of almost colorless gray, for comparison. The change in the strength of light in the gray field is caused by the sliding in opposite directions of two acute-angled prisms of gray glass. For every position of the latter, the amount of light which penetrates it from the Nernst lamp is determined; this amount will be expressed in the following table in per- centages of the strength of the Nernst light. With this appa- ratus, which can be used for many purposes, I have made a large number of measurements; if I give only a brief summary of these, please do not conclude a correspondingly brief period of labor on this subject; the table below is alone the result of over 1,000 separate measurements. Motor Irritant Values of Colored-glass Lights The numbers give the amount of light allowed to fall through the gray prisms in percentages of the whole amount striking these, the motor equation determ- ining the former amount. If I I S o§? 3 5 o ^i* -g o .» & 8 S S £ ttSja H Q Z $ « U (U Red 9-11 1.5-2.2 <0.6 7.3-9.3 0.9-1.1 <0.6 <0.6 <0.8 <1.0 Blue 1.5-2.5 2-3 9.9-11.8 0.8-0.9 7.4-8.8 9.3-11.1 8.3-11.1 11.1-14.8 8.3-14.8 2 This apparatus, "Differential Pupilloscope," is manufactured by C. Zeiss. 6 CARL VON HESS I began with measurements of the normal human eye in order to determine the average pupillomotor irritant value of the various colored lights. Further measurements of relatively blue- seeing, red-green blind (so-called red-blind), showed, as may be seen in the table, that a very slight irritant value of red, and a hardly perceptible variation from the normal motor-irritant value of blue, are characteristic of this disturbance of the sense of sight. For the sake of brevity I shall limit myself in the fol- lowing to- the discussion of the red and blue values, these being of the greatest importance to us. In two cases of totally color- blind which I have repeatedly examined, red proved to have a very slight motor-reactive value (<0.6), blue, a comparatively high value of 9-11.8% (as compared to 1.5-2.5% in the normal eye). These are the three principal kinds of pupil reactions which occur among normal and color-blind human beings and with these we must compare the motor reactive values found among the different animals. For the day bird, the sensitive value of red is like our own; this corresponds to the fact which I had already discovered by another method, that day birds in most cases see red lights nearly or quite as we see them. The relatively small values of blue, — they are the smallest which I have met with in the animal series — correspond to another fact which I had dis- covered, namely, that day birds in consequence of red and yellow oil globules located in front of the light receiving ap- paratus, are relatively blue blind. With the help of the apparatus I was enabled, among other things, to answer the following question, which I raised some time ago. The beautiful blue of the feathers of many birds is interpreted by almost all zoologists as decorative color for the attraction of the other sex: this interpretation assumes that these birds see blue as we see it, that therefore the oil drops do not exist. For if these drops are found in the eyes of these birds as they are found in the hen and the dove, then a blue which seems to us gorgeous must look to them blue-gray or colorless gray. So far I have had no opportunity to examine such birds with the spectrum according to the method described ; but a short time ago I examined the movements of the pupil of the Butterfly-finch (Mariposa phoenicotis) with the new ap- paratus ; the motor values are the same as for chicken and dove ; NEW EXPERIMENTS ON LIGHT REACTIONS 7 and herewith it is proved that the beautiful blue on breast and tail of this bird cannot be for adornment. Among the night birds I found the motor values like those of the color blind human eye, a fact which corresponds to the superior number of rods and cones in the retina of these birds. The relatively slight differences are sufficiently explained by the fact that in the retina of the night birds, the cones are not en- tirely lacking as many assume; indeed, I have repeatedly been able to count in such retinas one to two million cones, with slightly colored oil balls. Among the invertebrates, examination with the new appa- ratus of the movements of the pupils of Cephalopods, which are particularly well suited to the measuring experiments, shows as you see striking conformity to the irritative values for the totally color-blind human eye. By the use of other methods also, I have been able to show that these invertebrates are totally color-blind. I cannot here dwell on these new experiments. A glance at the table will show you further that the motor- sensitiveness of bees to colored lights, of mollusks (Psammobia) and of sea urchins (Centrostephanus) is almost identical with that of a color-blind man, whereas it differs characteristically from that of red-blind eyes. The reaction of bees I need not mention again, as the bees as well as fish and crabs may easily be proved totally color-blind by other methods which I have developed. The continually repeated mistaken assertions of a few zoologists, from which a color sense in these animals is sup- posed to be deducible, need no new refutation after the above measurements are studied by anyone at all familiar with the subject. The advantages of the new methods of research which I have here briefly indicated consist essentially in the following points: All the light reactions which I have hitherto carefully investi- gated in animals, the contraction of the pupils in birds and in- vertebrates, the swimming of fish and crabs and the flying of bees toward the light, the phenomena of retraction in Serpula and Psammobia, the rotations of the little clubs in the Centro- stephanus, etc., all these manifold movements which are caused by increasing or lessening the light, we are able by the help of our apparatus to measure with the identical, physically exactly determined colored lights, and to express their motor-sensitive 8 CARL VON HESS values in terms of one and the same measurable variable light with which each colored light is compared. Besides this, we are now in a position to bring all these reactions of animals in relation to the motor-sensitive values which the same colored lights have for the pupil of the normal, the red-blind, and the totally color-blind human eye. That it would be possible to carry out such exact measure- ments by this new process, I myself could not foresee at the be- ginning of these tests; as the results obtained coincide in every detail with those of my former widely differing experiments, they prove most satisfactorily the accuracy of the statements I have previously made about the sight qualities of animals. IV The long well-known fact that, on plants, red lights have comparatively slight, blue, on the contrary, strong heliotropic effect, that therefore in this respect there exists a certain simi- larity between the effect of colored lights on plants and on animals, gave J. Loeb occasion to accept the " Identity of ani- mal and plant heliotropism." Some time ago, referring to older experiments made by Wiesner and to more recent ones by Blaauw, I had expressed doubts of this theory; as in spite of this, Loeb's followers have again energetically taken up the defence of the identity of the two tropisms, it seemed to me advisable to attack this interesting question with new methods. In order to settle it so that every possible objection should be met, both reactions must be studied under identical conditions, with the same colored lights, and especially in quantitative experiments, the same light for measuring must be used for both. These conditions were fulfilled by the following procedure. Etiolated seedlings of various kinds, in long narrow boxes, were exposed on one side to the rays of a suitable Nernst-light spec- trum and simultaneously from the opposite side, to the light used for measurement and comparison, the latter being variable, an electric light placed in a tunnel adapted to the purpose. Its strength I varied partly by changing its position as required, to distances nearer to or farther from the plants, and partly by means of an episkotister. This method proceeds in the same lines as those developed in my experiments with Artemia and other animals which shun the light. Starting from a medium NEW EXPERIMENTS ON LIGHT REACTIONS 9 distance found by preliminary trials, after a very few hours we find the plants in red, yellow and green bent far over towards the measuring light, those in green, blue and a part of violet, towards the spectrum, those in the outer edge of violet and ultra- violet again bent toward the measuring light. Through this experiment we have found two lights in the spectrum whose heliotropic strength is equal to that of the composite light. The circumstance that the plants bend over on each side of these two colors in opposite directions make a comparatively exact spectroscopic determination of their respective wave lengths possible. By repeating such experiments, taking different dis- tances of the lamp from the plants, I obtained each time two new points for the construction of curves. You see here the curve of the motor irritative values of the different lights of the spec- trum for the invertebrates, next to it the curve of some among the plants (Brassica napus) which I have observed and you can see from these that there can be no question of identity between the two results ; the curve for animals has its maximum in yellow- green, with a wave length of about 526/*/*, that for Brassica napus has its maximum in blue or in the beginning of violet, with a wave length of about 475/*/*! In yellowish-green, where we find the maximum for animals, the heliotropic effect on the plants has already reached nearly its minimum. A second method for the investigation of certain questions occupying my attention, I worked out in this way: I have already shown that one can obtain beautiful and convincing results if a reservoir is lighted by rays reflected from colored paper at both ends, and direct light from the window is shut off by placing shades as required. Animals seeking the light, without exception hasten to that end which is lightest in the opinion of a color-blind individual quite irrespective of the way in which normal sight interprets the values. The heliotropic movements of plants have hitherto been observed only when caused by light from the spectrum or through colored glasses; it had never been attempted to find out whether heliotropic movements appear also when light from such reflecting surfaces alone is used. After I had found in a few introductory experi- ments that such is in fact the case to a quite surprising degree, I used this method for the solution of the problem before us. It is one easily adapted to the use of the interested layman. 10 CARL VON HESS If the tropisms were identical, the plants placed between the colored papers should behave in relation to these in exactly the same manner as animals under like conditions. If, however, the heliotropism of plants differs from that of animals as much as the curves indicate, then, if we carefully choose a green surface and a blue, place animals and plants between the two, the former will go to the green side and the plants will bend toward the blue in exactly opposite directions. This behavior is indeed quite marked as you see by the samples set before you. The plants bend over to the blue often in one to two hours after being placed in position. I have taken the liberty of briefly introducing to you two new methods for the investigation of the heliotropism of plants, because I believe they may do good service in botanical experi- ments and elsewhere, especially in quantitative experiments, and because particularly the second method may easily be handled by amateurs, and gives marked results, besides being well suited to use in the lecture room. As to the pertinent scientific ques- tions, these I have touched upon today only in so far as the often repeated assertions of Loeb, that animal and plant helio- tropism is identical, required a final refutation. V In conclusion, let me add a word on my discoveries about the sight qualities of fish and invertebrates. Zoologists and botan- ists have again and again declared they cannot acknowledge my ' theories ' (as they call them) because they stand in too harsh contradiction to the prevailing doctrines. The truth of the matter is, that I have never set up any theory whatever, but have made known only facts which every conscientious observer may easily verify for himself. What Sprengel pro- mulgated in 1793, and has been taught ever since about the connection between the coloring of flowers and the visits of insects, was a theory. This theory is now finally done away with, for it is built upon demonstrably wrong surmises as to the sight qualities of bees. Plant biology, for a hundred years and more under the ban of this doctrine, which even Darwin believed to be true, will now needs turn to the task of ascer- taining the real meaning of the splendor of color in blossoms. METHODS OF EXHIBITING REACTIVE TENDENCIES CHARACTERISTIC OF ONTOGENETIC AND PHYLOGENETIC STAGES ROBERT M. YERKES From the Harvard Psychological Laboratory Methods which have contributed importantly to our knowl- edge of the ontogeny and phylogeny of reactive tendencies, and more especially to those types of adaptive behavior which we call ideational, are few and unsatisfactory. Only recently have experimental devices and procedures been suggested which are alike suited to reveal the reactive tendencies of ontogenesis and phylogenesis and to stimulate interest in genetic description of behavior. Following a brief historical sketch, I shall describe an appa- ratus by means of which three of the most recent and promising of our behavioristic methods may be used. From the birth of interest in the problems of psychogenesis, about the middle of the last century, until the end of the cen- tury, no scientific means of approaching the problems of idea- tional behavior1 were developed. Romanes, Brehm, Morgan, and their psychological contemporaries who happened to be interested in evolutionary or genetic problems worked either from anecdotal materials or from observations gathered by the use of crude and unstandardized methods which may fairly be characterized as wholly unsuited to scientific inquiry. We re- gard their contributions to genetic psychology as suggestive of possibilities of research or as defining problems rather than as important additions to our knowledge of fact. With the appearance of Thorndike's mental initiative, the situation radically changed, for the puzzle-box or problem method came into existence and began to be used systematically as a 1 1 shall designate as ideational behavior those forms of adaptive response which in objective characteristics are identical with, or strikingly resemble, what we ap- propriately and with common consent call ideational behavior in man. 12 ROBERT M. YERKES means of testing for various types of behavior. Thorndike him- self devised various forms of apparatus and problem, while at the same time making them contribute most stirringly to our knowledge of the psychology of the chick, cat, dog, and monkey. Kinnaman, Small, Porter, Watson, and a host of other Ameri- can and European experimentalists followed Thorndike's lead in the application of experimental devices to the analysis of problem-solving behavior. It may not be amiss to point out that the puzzle-box method, although an important advance scientifically over the casually or inexactly arranged situations of the earlier period — not to mention the anecdote — does not adequately fulfill the require- ments of comparative and statistical method. True, it has possibilities of adaptation or improvement in these respects which have never been realized, but the fact is that mostly the data of response to a puzzle-box problem or situation are so meager and inexact as to be of scant value for purposes of com- parison or statistical treatment. Comparative and genetic psychology alike demand methods which shall yield precise, varied, and comparable data of reaction from measurements of various stages, types, and conditions of organization. L. W. Cole departed from the well-worn path which Thorn- dike had earlier broken, in originating the serial stimulus method of testing for imaginal or ideational behavior. This method, also, was ill-adapted to statistical needs, and like the earlier procedures, yielded only roughly comparable data. As thus far used, it is an indicator of problems rather than a scientifically exact instrument for solving them or of obtaining detailed de- scriptions of behavior. It has already served an important end in breaking up the monotonous succession of problem-box studies. Simultaneously with Cole's work on raccoons, which really revived interest in animal ideation, Hamilton, from a very different direction, attacked the general problem of reactive tendencies. As a psychiatrist, he had become deeply interested in applying the comparative method to the problems of psychiatry and in bringing the facts of animal psychology and genetic psy- chology to bear upon the practical problems of mental disease and defect. His first experimental attempt was a study of reac- tive tendencies in the dog. Over a period of ten years, he has METHODS OF EXHIBITING REACTIVE TENDENCIES 13 gradually perfected his method, the while applying it to various ontogenetic stages in man, cat, dog, and monkey, to defective and deranged human adults, and to many and diverse types of animal. The Hamilton method, which, in the opinion of the writer, is equal in importance to any method of studying behavior yet proposed, has been almost wholly neglected by comparative psychologists and its results are very imperfectly known. While Cole and Hamilton were busy with their new methods,. Carr and Hunter2 were perfecting, in the study of the white rat, what has appropriately been termed the method of delayed reaction. It is a simple and ingenious way of testing for idea- tion. Like Hamilton's, Hunter's contribution to our science is' important methodologically as well as for its factual materials. But whereas Hamilton's method of quadruple choices is suited to reveal reactive tendencies and to exhibit their genetic rela- tions, Hunter's serves primarily as a test of the ability of an organism to respond to a situation from which the significant feature (stimulus) has vanished. For purposes apparently foreign to the interests of both Hamil- ton and Hunter, the writer a few years ago devised yet another method of studying ideational and other reactive tendencies. It has been called the method of multiple choices. It was planned as a means of gathering strictly comparable data of reaction from diverse types of organism, stages of development, and conditions of normality or abnormality. It was the writer's hope and conviction that most varied scientific materials should be assembled systematically in the interest of genetic descrip- tion. The method is therefore appropriate to human psychology and to infrahuman, to child psychology and to psychopathology. To sum up: — for reasons which are obvious to every careful student of behavioristic method and result, Hamilton's method of quadruple choices is a preeminently valuable means of dis- playing reactive tendencies; Hunter's is an uniquely serviceable test of ability to respond appropriately to controllable absent stimuli; and the writer's is a promising mode of evoking varied types of response and of reactive tendency for purposes of classi- fication and more detailed analysis. 2 The method is hereafter referred to as Hunter's because he alone has pub- lished concerning it. 14 ROBERT M. YERKES The three methods differ so much in value, or rather in their special kinds of serviceableness, that they may not be directly compared. All are useful in the study of ideational and other highly adaptive forms of behavior, but each has certain peculiar advantages, whatever the ideational problem in question. For this reason, chiefly, it has seemed to the writer important, as a matter of economy and efficiency of research, to devise a form of apparatus which should enable the investigator to use at will any one of the three methods. It has not been especially difficult to plan such an apparatus, for the writer has had opportunity to use, and to see used, each method, and has had full advantage of the published results of Hamilton and Hunter, as well as personal contact with them. It may be convenient to refer to the device now to be described as the convertible ideational or reactive tendency apparatus. It is called an ideation apparatus, not because its usefulness is limited to the study of the function of the idea, but because it was originally devised as a means of discovering those types of behavior which are either definitely ideational or closely akii thereto. Objectivists who are offended by the term ideation may substitute reactive tendency or some other equivalent term. The three methods for which this apparatus may be employed are presented, not as the final word in the study of complex behavior, but rather as the first words concerning a new ap- proach to genetic problems. DESCRIPTION OF APPARATUS The apparatus consists (1) of twelve identical boxes, each with an entrance door and an exit door that can be raised or lowered by the experimenter from his observation stand; (2) a reaction chamber in which the subject responds, as may be, to a definite experimental situation, which may be described as a " setting " of the various mechanisms (this setting differs for the three methods, and also from trial to trial in the Yerkes' method) ; (3) a release box in which the subject is confined be- tween trials and from which it is admitted, at the proper mo- ment, to the reaction chamber; (4) alleys for the passage of the subject from the rear of the reaction mechanisms or boxes to the release box; (5) twelve reward mechanisms, one for each box; (6) a keyboard, or series of levers, (depending upon the size of METHODS OF EXHIBITING REACTIVE TENDENCIES 15 the apparatus) connected by means of cords or wires with the various entrance and exit doors of the apparatus, and so ar- ranged as to enable the experimenter to unlock and open or to close and lock any given door by a simple movement of a key or lever; (7) a protected incandescent lamp in each of the boxes, with the necessary switch and timing mechanisms for its satis- factory use in connection with the Hunter method of delayed reaction (lamps need not be installed in the twelve boxes, but only in those which are to be used for the delayed reaction method) . This apparatus may be built in three sizes: small, medium, and large. The small apparatus is suitable for experiments with such organisms as the toad, frog, lizard, tortoise, mouse, rat, spar- row, canary, and other like-sized amphibians, reptiles, birds, or mammals. The medium-sized apparatus is suited for experi- ments with the tortoise (large), snake, dove, crow, domestic fowl, cat, small dog, raccoon, rabbit, squirrel, marmoset, and o her medium-sized reptiles, birds, or mammals. The large apparatus may be used for various types of large-sized lower vertebrates, and for such mammals as the cat (large), dog, pig, goat, sheep, bear, monkey, ape, and man. The several figures indicate the general plan of the apparatus and certain of the most important points of construction. Each reaction box, according to figures 1 and 3, and also according to the measurements of table 1, occupies five degrees of arc. The width of the box is therefore determined by its distance from the center X (figures 1 and 3). By making the boxes intercept six degrees instead of five, the advantage can be gained of shorter distances between release door and entrance door, but there results the serious disadvantage that the appa- ratus is so spread out as to demand a considerable eye movement for inspection of the twelve reaction boxes. There is the further disadvantage, in the wider angle, that the large apparatus re- quires for its installation a floor area of nearly thirty-six by thirty-six feet. For these and other reasons, it has seemed desirable to make use of the five degree angle in the designing of this convertible apparatus. The alleys are, in each size of apparatus and throughout their lengths, the same width inside as the reaction boxes are outside. 16 ROBERT M. YERKES RB Figure 1. — Left half of medium sized reactive tendency apparatus. (1) 1-6, reac- tion mechanisms or boxes; En, entrance door; Ex, exit door; (2) RC, reaction chamber; (3) rb, release box; rd, door between release box and reaction cham- ber; (4) A, A, alley from reaction boxes to release box; D, door between alley A and release box; X, center of circle on arc of which reaction boxes are placed. METHODS OF EXHIBITING REACTIVE TENDENCIES 17 The plan of the medium sized apparatus appears as figure 1, and in figure 2 there is shown an enlargement of one of the reaction boxes, with the arrangement of sliding entrance and exit doors and the concealed reward mechanism. Figure 3 represents the three sizes of apparatus in their relations. These must, of course, be built separately and be independent of one another. Figure 2. — Ground plan of reaction box. En, entrance door; Ex, exit door; s, s, wooden guides for sliding door; B, wooden block for food cup; R, food cup. The small apparatus should be made of quarter inch white wood (poplar), red wood, or pine, according to locality, and covered with netting made of No. 20 wire, three meshes to the inch. The medium sized apparatus should be made of half inch stock, and the wire netting used as a covering, or for other necessary purposes in connection with it, should be No. 17 wire, two meshes to the inch. The large apparatus should be made of seven-eighths inch stock, and the accompanying wire netting should be made of No. 12 wire, one mesh to the inch. 18 ROBERT M. YERKES Figure 3. — General plan for three sizes of reactive tendency apparatus. S, small apparatus; M, medium appa- ratus; L, large apparatus. X, center of circles on arcs of which reaction boxes and outer alley walls are placed; A, release box for small apparatus; B, release box for medium apparatus; C, release box for large apparatus; D, E, F, alleys for small, medium, and large apparatus, respectively; 13, release door (the release doors for the three sizes of apparatus are shown); 14, door between release box C and alley F. METHODS OF EXHIBITING REACTIVE TENDENCIES 19 All stock should be planed on both sides, and the apparatus should be given two or three coats of dark gray paint, if it is to be exposed to the weather. If, instead, it is to be used in- doors, it should be painted white or gray, according to the degree of illumination of the experiment room. The walls of the reaction chamber should be made of wire netting of the weight indicated above. The outer walls of the alleys may be made of wood or wire netting. The release box should be built of wood except for the wire netting cover and door. The entrance and exit doors should be made of wood.8 In table 1 are presented the chief dimensions for the three sizes of apparatus under consideration. Table 1 Principal Dimensions in Centimeters or Inches of Convertible Reactive Tendency Apparatus Measurements Dimensions Dimensions . Dimensions for for for Of reaction boxes Small Medium Large Width outside 10 cm. 30 cm. 60 cm. Width inside (minimum) 7.5 cm. 25 cm. 51 cm. Length outside 30 cm. 60 cm. 140 cm. Length inside 29- cm. 58- cm. 135- cm. Depth outside 20 cm. 40 cm. 200 cm. Depth inside 19+ cm. 38+ cm. 198- cm. Of entrance and exit doors Width 8.4 cm. 27 cm. 54 cm. Length 2.0 cm. 40 cm. 200 cm. Of release box Width 33+ cm. 99+ cm. 198+ cm. Length 30 cm. 60 cm. 140 cm. Depth 20 cm. 40 cm. 200 cm. Of release box doors Width 10 cm. 30 cm. 60 cm. Length. 20 cm. 40 cm. 200 cm. 3 For details see Behavior Monographs, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 14. 4 20 ROBERT M. YERKES Measurements Dimensions Dimensions Dimensions Of alleys Small Medium Large Width inside 10 cm. 30 cm. 60 cm. Depth 20 cm. 40 cm. 200 cm. Distance from center X to entrance doors 114.5 cm. 343.6 cm. 687.1 cm. Distance from release door to entrance doors 105.9 cm. 317.6 cm. 635.1 cm. Of strips for doors to slide in Thickness 1/4 in. 1/2 in. 7/8 in. Width 2 cm. 3 . 5 cm. 6 . 5 cm. Length 20 cm. 40 cm. 200 cm. Block for reward mechanism Width 6 cm. 10 cm. 15 cm. Length 10 cm. 30 cm. 60 cm. Depth 2 cm. 4 cm. 6 cm. Hole in block Diameter 4 + cm. 6 + cm. 7 + cm. Food cup Diameter at top 4 cm. 6 cm. 7 cm. Depth 2 cm. 4 cm. 6 cm. Cover for food cup Width 7 cm. 20 cm. 30 cm. Length 8(2+6) 14(4 + 10) 25(10 + 15) Space necessary for apparatus in use Width 10 ft. 20 ft. 30 ft. Length 12 ft. 20 ft. 36 ft. Certain suggestions concerning details of construction are of practical importance. It is desirable, for the sake of uniformity, to supply each box with a floor. This floor should be cut shorter than the sides of the box so that the entrance and exit doors may drop past it, thus discouraging attempts of subjects to raise the doors. Or, if the floor is cut full length, a strip nailed across the box just inside of the exit door will serve the same purpose while giving support to the floor. Each box should have a wire netting cover on top. * METHODS OF EXHIBITING REACTIVE TENDENCIES 21 All doors should slide vertically, upward, in wooden ways. These are conveniently made by nailing strips of wood to the side walls of the box. The strips serve the additional purpose of supporting the side walls. The outside strip may either be nailed to the end of the side wall or along the side. If nailed to the end, it serves as the outside strip for adjacent doors and thus reduces the amount of labor. In figure 2, the outside strip for the entrance door is shown as nailed to the end of the side wall. The writer prefers this method of construction. The reward receptacle, or mechanism, must be so constructed as to be concealed when the exit doors are down and fully ex- posed when they are raised. It may be simply and conveniently constructed by nailing outside the rear end of each box a block of wood, of the dimensions suggested in the table, in the center of which there is a hole large enough to receive a metal food cup. Aluminum is preferable as material for the food cup, and desirable dimensions for the various sizes of apparatus are sug- gested in table 1. In the proper position on the outside of the exit door, there should be screwed a metal plate, bent at right angles in such wise as to cover completely and tightly the food cup when the exit door is down. This is shown in figure 4. Figure 4. — Metal cover for food cup. w, position of food cup under cover; z, point at which cover is bent nearly at right angles; x, portion of cover which is at- tached to exit door by means of wood screws, holes for which are indicated; y, portion of cover which hides food cup. The dimensions for this cover or cap for the food cup, also, are indicated in table 1. For the small apparatus, heavy tin is a satisfactory material for this cover; for the medium appa- ratus, light galvanized iron suffices; and for the- large appa- ratus, it is necessary to use galvanized iron which is so thick that the large apes cannot readily bend the cover out of shape. The thickness should be about 1/16 inch. 22 ROBERT M. YERKES For most animals there is no necessity of locking the doors of the apparatus, but when it is to be used with monkeys or anth- ropoid apes, it is absolutely necessary that the experimenter be able to securely lock any one or all of the sliding doors. It is therefore essential to equip the large sized apparatus with locks to be operated in connection with the mechanisms which raise and lower the doors. Each door should lock automatically when lowered and unlock when the raising mechanism is operated. Just behind and a trifle above the release box, an observer's stand or record table should be constructed, separated by a screen from the apparatus so that the animal shall not be able to see the observer. On this table there should be placed a keyboard, or lever device, by means of which any one of the twenty-six working doors4 of the apparatus may be raised or lowered quickly and quietly. For the small apparatus the various doors may be controlled readily by means of a light cord, which runs from a screw eye in the top of each door, through appropriately placed pulleys, to a hinged lever key which the observer operates. This key should be so arranged that when it stands in approximately vertical position the entrance door is closed. When it is placed in the horizontal position, the entrance door is open. A cord from the exit door, carried similarly by pulleys, should be so placed that it may be attached readily by means of hook and ring, or ball and slot, to this key, so that if, when a given en- trance door is lowered, the experimenter desires to raise, simul- taneously, the exit door of the same box, the pushing of the key to the vertical position will effect the appropriate move- ment of each door, that is, will simultaneously lower the given entrance door and raise the given exit door. The distance to which the entrance door is raised may be altered by changing the point of attachment of the cord to the key. This simple hinged key and cord device renders necessary the use of only fourteen keys for the operating of twenty-six doors, but the scheme is feasible only so long as the doors in question are light enough to be readily moved by means of a fairly small lever key. The accompanying diagram, figure 5, indicates the rela- tions of parts, as described above. 4 If both return alleys are used there are twenty-seven doors instead of twenty- six to operate. METHODS OF EXHIBITING REACTIVE TENDENCIES 23 Ex En Figure 5.— Diagram of lever-key mechanism for raising and lowering doors. En, entrance door; Ex, exit door; T, observer's table: s, hinged lever key in vertical position; p, same, in horizontal position; A, pulley for cord between entrance door and lever key; B. pulley for cord between exit door and lever key; C, second pulley for cord from exit door. For the medium sized apparatus also, the lever key mechan- ism is feasible, but it requires considerably more space and much greater effort on the part of the experimenter. A sub- stitute for it is the weighted cord mechanism.5 A cord with appropriate carrying pulleys is provided for each door, and to the end of the cord, which drops in front of the experimenter's table and within easy reach, is attached an iron or lead weight which is just sufficient to hold the door in position after it has been raised by the experimenter. If the weight is too heavy, the door will tend to rise at inappropriate times; if too light, it will not stay in position after being raised. This device has the defect of varying in reliability with humidity and temperature, since the door will slide more or less easily in accordance with these varying conditions. The lever mechanism is preferable, 5 Described in previous papers on the multiple- choice method. A study of the behavior of the pig Sus Scrofa by the multiple-choice method, Journal of Animal Behavior, 1915, 5, p. 188. The mental life of monkeys and apes: a study of idea- tional behavior, Behavior Monographs, 1916, 3, p. 14. 24 ROBERT M. YERKES since it can be relied upon to place and hold the doors in a constant position. For the large apparatus, it is extremely desirable to devise some type of lever mechanism which shall be easily manipu- lated, reliable, and inexpensive. All of the mechanisms thus far proposed are either too cumbersome or too expensive to be feasible, but it is hoped that shortly a method may be discovered by which the experimenter may conveniently and accurately control the various doors by means of levers, the maximum excursion of which shall not exceed eighteen inches. Since the various doors must be raised a maximum of seventy-two inches, it will probably be necessary to introduce one or more forms of multiplying device. Already an automatic locking device, to be operated in connection with the proposed system of levers, has been designed. In the absence of a satisfactory scheme for the use of levers, weighted cords and locks, which are operated independently, may be employed. But this system of control mechanism, as has been stated above, is both unreliable and troublesome to operate because of the numerousness of the parts. There must be a separate weighted cord for each of the twenty-six doors and a separate lock mechanism for each of the twelve boxes, entrance and exit door in each case being controlled by the same lock. USE OF APPARATUS The use of the convertible reactive tendency apparatus in con- nection with each of the three methods in question will now be described. For all of the methods alike, rewards and punishments may be used as inducements to effort. As rewards, food pre- sented in the food cups, or for children small presents similarly presented, serve well. In certain exceptional instances, it may prove desirable to present the reward for a successful choice, not in the food cup of the correct box, but instead at the entrance to the release box. As punishment, it has proved feasible to use confinement in incorrect boxes. It seems probable that for cer- tain organisms the electric shock may prove useful. Hamilton Method For use with the Hamilton method of quadruple choices, the following procedure is suggested. This method involves the use of only four reaction mechanisms. Boxes 5, 6, 7 and 8 may METHODS OF EXHIBITING REACTIVE TENDENCIES 25 therefore be used, the fact that they are to be reacted to being indicated by their openness, the entrance doors being raised in case of each trial. Since the entrance doors of all other boxes should remain closed and locked, there would be no persistent tendency on the part of most organisms to attempt to enter other than the four boxes referred to. For some purposes, it may prove even more satisfactory to use boxes 2, 5, 8 and 11. Incorrect choices would not be rewarded, and as seemed desir- able the subject could be punished for such choices by being confined in the boxes for a stated period. A correct choice, no matter what the particular form of the problem, would naturally be rewarded by the presentation of food in the food cup. Various problems, in addition to that originally suggested by Hamilton, may be presented by this method. The following will suggest the range of possibilities: (1) An insoluble prob- lem, such as Hamilton used, the several boxes serving as cor- rect boxes in irregular order, but the same one never twice in succession and each the same number of times in every hundred trials (this problem is practically insoluble by even the most intelligent organism) ; (2) the systematic use, as correct box, of each in turn from the left end to the right end, that is, 5, 6, 7, 8, or in case of the other group of boxes, 2, 5, 8, 11, this suc- cession being repeated indefinitely; (3) box at left end, box at right end, box next to left end, box next to right end, the same being repeated indefinitely. From these suggestions, it is evi- dent that various degrees of complexity of order and relation- ship might be utilized to elicit reactive tendencies and to dis- play problem solving ability of different sorts. The apparatus demands no special modification or adaptation for use in connection with the Hamilton method. Further details are unnecessary in view of the fact that Hamilton has already published a fairly complete description of method and apparatus,6 and has in press a still more elaborate account of procedure and results.7 Hunter Method For the method of delayed reaction the apparatus demands certain special appliances which, however, do not have to be removed when either the Hamilton or the Yerkes method is 6 Hamilton, G. V. A studv of trial and error reactions in mammals. Journal of Animal Behavior, 1911, 1, pp. 33-66. 7 Behavior Monographs, 1917, 3, no. 13. 26 ROBERT M. YERKES in use. The special equipment consists of a concealed incan- descent electric lamp for the illumination of each box and an electric signal and timing mechanism for the operation of the lamps and the door between the release box and the reaction chamber. The method of delayed reaction may be used with various groups of doors, according to the grade of difficultness of re- sponse desired. Thus, as the simplest situation, boxes 6 and 8 may be used. In this case, the entrance doors of both boxes should be raised in preparation for a trial. The doors of the other boxes should remain closed. In accordance with a pre- arranged plan, either the one or the other box would be indi- cated, by momentary illumination, as the box to be chosen. For the second grade of difficultness, boxes 5, 6, 7 and 8 might be used, each of them having the necessary equipment and con- nections for use as the correct box; for grade three, boxes 2, 5, 8 and 11 ; for grade four, boxes 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 ; and for grade five, all of the twelve boxes might be subject to use, that is, the entrance door of every box should be open and the subject should be required to choose that one of the twelve which has previously been illuminated. The satisfactory use of this method necessitates not only the presence of a lamp, but the installation of a mechanism which shall control several important factors in the situation. The experimenter, by pressing a simple key, should close a circuit which at once illuminates a certain box (the particular box to be determined by the setting of a switch), and at the same time starts a timing mechanism. This mechanism should, after an interval, with a range of 1 to 10 seconds, open the lighting cir- cuit, thus cutting off the illumination of the correct box; and after an interval of 0 to 60 seconds it should cause the door of the release box to open so that the animal may enter the reaction chamber. For intervals longer than 60 seconds, it seems best to have the experimenter determine the delay by means of a stop watch and operate the door of the release box by hand. There is no obvious reason why this twelve mechanism reac- tive tendency apparatus should not be used in wholly satisfac- tory fashion for the study of delayed reactions. The additional electrical equipment should in no wise interfere with the other uses of the apparatus and that portion of it which controls the release box door might be made to serve the experimenter in connection with all of the methods. METHODS OF EXHIBITING REACTIVE TENDENCIES 27 Yerkes Method For use by the method of multiple choices, the apparatus demands neither modification nor special adaptation. The chief features of the method have already been described several times, and it is needless here to do more than formulate a set of problems with wider range of difncultness than those hereto- fore used in reported experiments on lower animals. Those proposed problems, ten in number, are presented in brief form below, with a series of ten settings for each. Thus, in case of problem 1, for which the correct mechanism is always box number 5, that is the fifth from the left end of the apparatus, the first setting involves the use of boxes 1 to 6, the second setting, of boxes 3 to 12, and so on. It is understood* that, if possible, this series of ten settings (ten trials) shall be presented to a subject once a day until the problem has been solved. If for any reason the series of ten trials cannot be completed on a given day, it should be resumed from the point of interrup- tion on the following day. If more than one series per day can be given, either the ten trials may be divided into two groups of five each or the total series may be repeated. In each of the series of ten settings, a total of sixty boxes is presented. The average number of boxes open in each trial is, therefore, six. Of these sixty boxes, ten are definable as correct boxes. The probability of correct first choice prior to experience is for any series of ten trials, one to five. In order that this ratio of probable right to wrong first choices shall not be disturbed, it is desirable that the experimenter make use of the proposed settings. Proposed Problems and Settings for Multiple-Choice Method Problem 1. Same box (box 5). 1-6 (5) ; 3-12 (5) ; 4-6 (5) ; 5-9 (5) ; 2-10 (5) ; 4-5 (5) ; 4-10 (5) ; 3-6 (5) ; 1-8 (5) ; 5-10 (5). Problem 2. First at left end. 6-12 (6); 11-12 (11); 3-11 (3); 1-5 (1) ; 4-11 (4); 10-12 (10); 5-9 (5); 2-12 (2); 8-11 (8); 7-12 (7). Problem 3. Middle. 1-7 (4); 10-12 (11); 6-10 (8); 1-11 (6) ; 1-3 (2); 4-10 (7); 1-9 (5); 9-11 (10); 1-5 (3); 6-12 (9). 28 ROBERT M. YERKES Problem 4. Third from right end. 1-6 (4); 5-8 (6); 3-12 (10); 1-3 (1); 7-11 (9); 2-10 (8); 1-7 (5); 3-5 (2); 2-9 (7;) 1-5 (3). Problem 5. Alternately left end and right end. 8-12 (8); 1-10 (10); 3-8 (3); 6-9 (9); 1-9 (1); 3-5 (5); 7-11 (7); 5-12 (12); 2-8 (2); 4-6 (6). Problem 6. Progressively from right to left end of apparatus — toward left bv ones. 10-12 (12); 6-12 (11); 3-10 "(10); 8-12 (9); 8-10 (8); 1-9 (7); 5-8 (6); 4-9 (5); 2-11 (4); 3-7 (3). Problem 7. One place to left of middle key. 6-12 (8); 3-5 (3); 8-12 (9); 1-9 (4); 2-12 (6); 10-12 (10); 5-11 (7); 1-5 (2); 3-9 (5); 1-3 (1). Problem 8. Alternately second from right and second from left. 6-12 (11); 2-5 (3); 1-8 (7) ; 5-9 (6); 1-5 (4); 4-12 (5); 5-10 (9); 9-11 (10); 2-9 (8); 1-5 (2). Problem 9. To the right of mid-point in even group; or first member of second-half of group. 3-10 (7); 1-4 (3); 2-7 (5) 1-2 (2); 3-12 (11); 8-11 (10); 5-12 (9); 1-10 (6); 5-10 (8) 11-12 (12). Problem 10. Alternately to left of middle key and to right of it. 1-7 (3); 8-12 (11); 2-10 (5); 10-12 (12); 1-9 (4); 3-9 (7); 1-3 (1); 6-10 (9); 6-12 (8); 3-7 (6). The various forms of problem serviceable in' connection with the different methods and the detailed procedure for each remain to be worked out. The methods have been thoroughly tried out and have already yielded such valuable results that further development and application is obviously desirable. There is no reason why the same apparatus should not henceforth serve for studies of reactive tendencies and ideational behavior by the method of quadruple choices, that of delayed reaction, that of multiple choices, and that of conditioned reflexes. We experimenters shall . doubtless do well to use our devices to the limit of their applicability, seeking no less assiduously new ways of employing existing experimental equipment than we seek to invent new mechanisms. LIGHT REACTIONS OF THE CRIMSON-SPOTTED NEWT, DIEMYCTYLUS VIRIDESCENS A. M. REESE West Virginia University INTRODUCTION The following experiments, which are extensive rather than intensive in character, were started with a dozen salamanders obtained in the month of November from the Marine Biological Laboratory at Woods Hole. During the course of the experi- ments, which extended over a period of more than a year, three of the animals escaped, so that some of the later results were obtained with only nine animals; they were obtained from Woods Hole because of their comparative rarity in the neigh- borhood of Morgantown when the work was begun. Later, animals were caught in a local pond and these were also used in the experiments. No change in reaction, except in one possible case, was pro- duced by prolonged residence (for a month or more) in a photo- graphic dark room, though it was noted that all of the animals were of a lighter shade of color when first brought from the dark room. ' In all but one or two cases the animals were confined in a rectangular glass aquarium, six inches wide by ten inches long, with two or three inches of water. The water was used chiefly for two reasons: because the newts were very much more active in the water than they were in the empty aquarium, and because the water, of course, acted as a heat-screen and practically elim- inated heat as a stimulus. A few tests were made without water, with no noticeable difference in reaction except speed; the animals responded two or three times as quickly when in water than they did when in the merely moistened aquarium. Observations made upon animals in an evenly illuminated aquarium seemed to show that they have a certain tendency 30 A. M. REESE to collect in groups, in one place or another, without regard to the light stimuli to which they are subjected; this tendency, then, has no apparent bearing upon the following experiments. After hundreds of observations, extending over a period of many months, upon several lots of animals, several sets of observations were made upon one or two small groups of animals immediately upon bringing them into the laboratory from their native pond. Under these conditions the animals responded either very indefinitely to the same light stimuli, or even in a contrary manner to the animals that had been for some time under observation. This irregularity in what had been con- sidered the normal response was also noticed in a group of animals that had been in the aquarium for a long time and had not been used in the experiment for a considerable period. It is possible that, after all, the responses of the animals under these abnormal conditions may be quite different from what would be seen under normal conditions in their native habitat. It is the intention of the author to carry on similar experi- ments upon this species in the natural environment as soon as a suitable spot can be found. (See Addendum.) Experiment I. — This experiment was to determine whether Diemyctylus is positively or negatively phototropic towards white light. Twelve animals were placed in the above-described aquarium of water which was entirely surrounded by black except over half of the top. Ten inches above the surface a 25-watt, 115- volt tungsten lamp was so fixed as to illuminate exactly one- half of the aquarium, the other half, of course, being thrown in dense shadow. At regular intervals of five minutes the numbers of animals in both light and dark ends were noted. When an animal, at the moment of observation, happened to be partly in light and partly in shadow it was counted for that region in which the greater part of its length lay, though occasionally an animal was so near the exact center that it was not counted on either side. Table I shows that in 30 observations 95 animals were found in the light and 250 in the dark. These observations were LIGHT REACTIONS OF NEWT 31 taken on three different days; and after observations 5, 7 and 17 the light and dark ends were suddenly interchanged, thereby throwing the larger proportion of the animals, that had collected in the shadow, into the light. The last five observations were made about two weeks after the first, during which time three of the animals had escaped. TABLE I Observation. . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Light half 232220012042252 Dark half 10 9 10 10 10 12 12 11 10 12 8 10 10 7 10 Observation. . . 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Totals Light half 126454354148955 95 Dark half 11 10 6 8 7 8 9 7 8 11 5 1 0 4 4 250 Another set of observations made under the same conditions, except that only enough water to moisten the bottom of the aquarium was used, gave 141 animals in the light to 243 in the dark region. As noted above, without enough water to swim in the newts are so sluggish that experimentation is not nearly so satisfactory as when they are actively swimming. It is evident, then, that, at least under the conditions of the experiment, these newts are negatively phototropic. Experiment II. — Variations of experiment I were tried to de- termine the effect of temperature upon the phototropic reac- tions of Diemyctylus. The first variation was merely to start the observations, made upon eleven animals, with the water at 10° C, the arrangement of aquarium and lights being as in experiment I. Not only was the aquarium surrounded by black, but the experiment was performed in a photographic dark room. Beween the 15th and 16th observations was an interval of two hours, during which time the animals were in the dark. After the 30th obser- vation, when all the animals were in the dark half of the aqua- rium, the ends were reversed, throwing all the animals into the light half. When the animals, as in this case, were sluggish it would be some time before they would move into the dark again, which would reduce the total preponderance of dark over light. The total figures for 40 observations were 174 in the light end to 278 in the dark, which was about the proportion noted in experiment I when no water was used. At the end of 32 A. M. REESE this part of this experiment the temperature of the water had risen about 2° C. In the second variation of this experiment the aquarium con- taining the animals was placed out-of-doors for about five hours, until the temperature of the water had fallen to 1° C ; it was then brought into the dark room where the same arrangement for vertical illumination of just half of the aquarium as in ex- periment I was used. All of the animals at this temperature were numb with cold, and lay motionless on the bottom of the aquarium. One or two were apparently dead and when turned over, ventral side up, made no effort to right themselves. At the beginning of this series of observations six animals were placed in the dark end of the aquarium and five in the light end. TABLE Hi Observations 123456789 10 Light half 5555544444 sssssSSsss Dark half 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 sssssSSSSs Observations . . 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Light half 6667221000 S s s S S- S- A Dark half 5 5 5 4 9 9 10 11 11 11 S S S S S- S- S A- A- A Observations . . 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 35 37 38 Light half 3005 5 4 2252 A . . . . S- a A- A- S a A Dark half 8 11 11 6 6 7 9 9 6 9 S S S S- S- S A- S a A Observations . . 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 53 51 52 Light half 0644533157 .. A A- A A S S- A- a a Dark half 11 577688 10 64 .. S A- s S A- S- A- A A Observations . . 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 Totals Light half 5 6 2 9 5 9-5 2 259 a A A A A a a a Dark half 65926269 446 A A A A A a a A 11 12 13 14 4 4 4 4 s s s s 7 7 7 7 s S S S- 25 26 27 28 10 7 4 4 S- A A A- 1 4 7 7 s- s s 39 40 41 42 3 111 a A A A 8 10 10 10 A- A- A- A 53 54 55 56 6 6 8 8 a a a a 5 5 3 3 a A a A Observations were begun at intervals of three minutes, but 1 In this and the following experiments the letters refer to the average activity of the animals at the time of observation — a = very active;. A = less active; A — = still less active, s = very quiet; S = less quiet; S — = still less quiet. A — and S — would probably be about the same state of ac tivity. LIGHT REACTIONS OF NEWT 33 as no change of position had taken place at the end of fifteen minutes the interval between observations was changed to five minutes, from observations 7 to 21, after which it was again made three minutes. It will be seen from table II that, for the first 18 observa- tions, lasting about one and one-fourth hours, there was very little change in the position of the animals, which lay almost motionless during that time. At the 18th observation the tem- perature of the water had risen to only 7° C, and warm water was carefully added until that in the aquarium was raised to 13.5° C. ; the animals soon began to become more active, and after twenty minutes (22nd observation) all were collected in the dark half of the aquarium. From the 22hd observation until the end of the experiment observations were made at intervals of three minutes. It will be seen by table II that the light was changed after the 24th observation, throwing all the animals into the light end; after fifteen minutes all the animals had again collected in the dark region. After the 31st observation, when the water of the aquarium had risen to 15° C, warm water was again added until that in the aquarium was raised to 24° C. ; this operation was repeated after the 36th observation and the temperature raised to 33° C. The animals were mostly very active but continued to collect in the dark region, so that after the 43rd observation, when all were in the dark, the ends were reversed, throwing all the animals in the light end. After the 50th observation, when ten of the eleven animals were in the dark region, enough water was added to raise the temperature to 36.5° C. ; this caused the animals to become unusually active, to frequently give a squeaking sound, and to come to the surface for air. After this, it will be noticed from the table, there is no longer a tendency to collect in the dark, possibly a slight tendency in the reverse direction. After the 59th observation water was again added until that in the aqua- rium was raised to to 38° C. At this temperature the animals acted as just described, but with more vigor. Some of them were so seriously affected that they turned ventral side up and could scarcely right themselves again, and it was evidently im- possible to further increase the temperature without endanger- ing the lives of the animals. 34 A. M. REESE It is apparent, therefore, that low temperatures, not far above the freezing point of water, cause these animals to become so sluggish as to be more or less indifferent to differences of light and darkness. As the temperature rises they become active and seek the dark region of the aquarium. When the temperature reaches about 36° C. they become abnormally active and again become indifferent to light and shade differences. At somewhat less than 40° C, about the temperature of human blood, (though they could doubtless be acclimated to higher temperatures') they are seriously affected or possibly killed. Experiment III. — Another variation of experiment I was to determine whether the animals would seek the dark half of the aquarium when the illumination was from below. The same aquarium and eleven animals were used as in the preceding experiments, but the light was thrown from below by the same tungsten lamp, placed six inches below the bottom of the aquarium. In all, 60 observations, at three-minute in- tervals, were made, with a rest of three and one-half hours be- tween the 30th and 31st observations. The temperature of the water was about 27.5° C. and the animals were active throughout the experiment, those in the light being the more active, on the average. The total number of animals counted in the light was 266; those in the dark, 360. It is evident then, that Diemyctylus tends to come to rest in the dark region of the aquarium when the light comes from below, but that the tendency is not so strong as when the source of light is above the water. Experiment IV. — This experiment was to determine the re- action of Diemyctylus in relation to the direction of white light. In this and similar experiments both the region of the aqua- rium where found and the position of the animal in relation to the direction of the light were noted. It was noticed that when the aquarium, described on page 29, was placed with one end about eight feet from a window, but not in the direct sun- light, on a fairly bright day, a large proportion of the animals stayed in the end of the aquarium towards the light and swam against the glass as though trying to get nearer the window. No actual counts were made in this observation. LIGHT REACTIONS OF NEWT 35 TABLE III Observations 123456789 10 Facing light 8867767776 A- A- A- S- A A A- A A- A- Facingdark 3354.. 54442 S S S S.. A-S-S-S S In light end 7 6 4 5 7 5 6 8 4 4 A A- A- A- A A- A- A- A A In dark end 4 5 7 6 4 6 5 3 7 7 S S- S S S A- S- S- S- S Observations 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Total Facing light 5469868696 136 a A A A- A- a A A A- a Facing dark 4412343425 68 S- S S S S S- S- S- S- S- In light end 5467778676 119 aAAA-AAAA a a In dark end 6 7 5 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 101 S-SSSSS-SSSS- Table III shows the results of a series of observations upon the same eleven animals used in the preceding experiments, The aquarium, containing a few inches of water, was entirely sur- rounded by black except at the end which was towards the win- dow, in this case twenty feet away. The day, while not dark, was overcast, and the light that entered the open end of the aquarium was naturally quite dim. When an animal, at the instant of observation, lay at right angles to the direction of the light it was not counted. It will be seen that exactly twice as many animals faced towards the light as faced away from it, while the number of animals in the half of the aqaurium near the window was not very much greater than the number in the other half. It will be noticed also that, as a rule, the animals facing the light were more active than those facing in the other direction, and that those in the half nearer the light were more active than the others. This experiment shows that these salamanders are positively phototactic even towards weak daylight., Experiment V. — This experiment or series of experiments was to determine the reaction of the animals towards a much more intense white light than the daylight of the preceding experi- ment. The light here used was the same 25-watt, 115-volt tungsten lamp that was used in experiment I; it was placed six inches from the open end of the aquarium. The aquarium 36 A. M. REESE was surrounded except at one end by a black cloth, and the whole apparatus was operated in a photographic dark room. Observations were made at intervals of five minutes. The tem- perature varied from 16.5° C. to 19° C. Eleven animals were used. At the beginning of the experiment the animals . were quiet and equally distributed through the aquarium. TABLE IV Observations 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Facing light 7 10 9 7 10 10 8 10 9 7 8 8 4 S-A-A-aAA a A A A A A A- Facingdark 1124113124337 S S .. S- A- S S- S S- S- S- S A- In light end 787788 10 876954 S-A-A aA aA a a a a a A- In dark end 4344331345267 S S- A- S- A- S- S S S- S- S S A- Observations 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Facing light 6 9 10 7 10 8 8 9 10 8 11 9 9 A- A A A A A A a A A A- A- A- Facingdark 32.. 2132213022 A- A- .. S- S S S S .. S- .. S S In light end 5 7 6 7 6 8 8 9 6 4 7 9 8 A-AA aAAA a a aAA a In dark end 6454533257423 A- A A- A- S- S A S- S- S- S- S- S Observations 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Totals Facing light 88878987554 298 A A A A- S S- A- A- A A A- Facingdark 13243.. 34662 90 S S S S S .. S S S-A-A- In light end 97974444534 244 a a A A- A A A- A A- A- A In dark end 24247777687 163 SSSSSSSSS-AA For explanation of letters see page 32. Observations 1 to 12 were made at night; the other observa- tions during the morning and afternoon of the following day. Between observations 22 and 23 was an interval of two hours and five minutes during which the tungsten light was shining into the end of the aquarium. After observations 9 and 25 all the animals were gently pushed into the end of the aquarium away from the light. After observation 12 and about one hour before observation 13 the animals were fed as much raw meat as they would eat. It will be seen from table IV that the aver- age activity of the animals facing the light was greater than LIGHT REACTIONS OF NEWT 37 that of the animals facing away from the light; and that the animals in the near half of the aquarium were, as a rule, more active than those in the half farther from the light. As before, animals which lay, at the moment of observation, with the long axis at right angles to the direction of the rays of light were not counted. The total number of animals facing the light was 298, to 90 that faced away from the light; the number in the near half of the aquarium was 244, to 163 in the half farther from, the light. Experiment VI. — Another series of 25 observations, taken every five minutes, under conditions similar to those just de- scribed, except that the aquarium was in an ordinary room and covered with the same black cloth, gave 200 facing the light to 78 facing away from the light, and 179 in the near end to 97 in the far end of the aquarium. Experiment VII. — Still another series of 30 observations, taken every five minutes, was made upon nine of the same animals after having been in the dark for 32 days except for about two and one-half hours three days before the present experiment. This was to determine if prolonged residence in total darkness had any effect upon their reaction to white light. The arrange- ment of the apparatus was the same as in experiment V. One hundred and ninety-seven animals were found facing the light, to 72 facing away from the light; 202 were in the near half, to 74 in the far half of the aquarium. It will be seen by comparison with experiment V that, after this long residence in darkness, the preponderance of animals that faced the light over those that faced in the opposite direc- tion was less than in animals that had been in the light; while the preponderance of animals in the near half of the aquarium over those found in the distant half was greater in animals that had been in the dark than in those that had been in the light. It is possible that these differences may have been due to other causes than the prolonged residence in the dark. Experiment VIII. — To see whether the same eleven animals were positively phototactic to a light of even greater intensity than the tungsten the aquarium, covered as before, with a black 38 A. M. REESE cloth, was placed, in a dark room, with its open end fifteen inches from the lens of an arc projection lantern. Observations were taken at five-minute intervals. At this distance the light was, of course, decidedly painful to the human eye. The positive response was so marked that only 15 observa- tions were made, which gave 116 facing towards the light to 41 facing away; and 105 animals in the near half of the aquarium to 60 in the distant half. The animals facing the light and in the near half were, as a rule, somewhat, though not a great deal, more active than the others. It appears, therefore, that the response to white light is about the same whether the source of light be dim daylight or an intense electric arc. Experiment IX. — This experiment was to determine the effect of low temperature upon the responses of Diemyctylus to white light at the end of the aquarium. TABLE V Observations.. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Facing light 1 0 0 7 2 2 3 5 2 3 0 S S- S- A- A- S- S- S- Facingdark 10 11 11 4 9 9 8 6 9 8 8 S- S- S- A- S- S- S- S- A- In near end 1 00 76 5 6 74 3 0 s S S S S- S- A- S- S- S- S- In far end 10 11 11 4 5 6 5 4 7 8 11 s S S S- S- S S- S A- S- S- S- S- A- Observations . . 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Facing light. .. 02 4 46243433254 S A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A- Facing dark. ..443347774787 4.. A- S A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A- In near end... 0000 10 774422222 S A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A- In far end 11 11 11 11 14 4 7 7 9 9 9 9 9 A- S S A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A- Observations 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Totals Facing light 4 4 3 5 7 2 4 4 6 3 3 6 122 A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A Facing dark 556649765853 231 A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A In near end 338567555543 140 A- A- A- A- A- A- A A- A In far end 88265 4 666678 266 A- A- A A- A- A- A- A- A LIGHT REACTIONS OF NEWT 39 The same animals and arrangement of apparatus were used as in experiment V, the only difference in the experiments being that in the present one, table V, the aquarium containing the animals had been placed outdoors for three hours, until the temperature of the water had fallen to 0° C. and a thin skim of ice had formed. As in experiment II the animals at the beginning of the obser- vations were all stationary, as though dead, and were evenly scattered over the bottom of the aquarium. Observations 1 to 6 were taken at ten-minute intervals ; 7 to 40 were at five-minute intervals. After observations 5, 17 and 30 the ends were re- versed, thus putting the animals from the far to the near end of the aquarium; this, of course, raised the total number for the far end and lowered the total number for the near end. For the first 3 observations, or one-half hour, practically no change in the position of the animals took place; at this point warm water was carefully added until the temperature of that in the aquarium was raised to 8.5° C, and by the end of the experi- ment the temperature had slowly raised until it was 12.5° C. After the addition of the warm water the animals began to show signs of life, though they remained rather sluggish to the end of the experiment. In 40 observations 122 animals faced towards the light to 231 away from the light; 140 were in the near half of the aqua- rium, 266 in the half farther from the light. Experiment X. — This was a continuation of the preceding ex- periment under exactly the same conditions except that the temperature of the water at the first observation was 4.5. C. instead of 0° C, and the animals were moving about very slowly instead of lying perfectly still. After the 4th, 5th and 14th observations all the animals were pushed into the near half of the aquarium. Observations were somewhat irregular, being every ten minutes for about the first half of the observation, every five minutes for the latter half of the observations. After ob- servation 16 warm water was added until the aquarium tem- perature was 23.5° C. ; the dark room being cold, this tempera- ture was lowered 2° by the end of the experiment. In 28 observations 134 animals were found facing the light to 147 that faced away from the light; while 107 animals were counted 40 A. M. REESE in the near half of the aquarium to 212 in the far half. It is noticeable, however, that in the 16 observations before the warm water was added 67 animals faced the light to 83 that faced in the opposite direction, while in the 13 observations after the addition of the warm water 67 animals again faced the light but only 64 faced away from it. Again, in the first 16 observations 50 animals were counted in the near half of the aquarium to 126 in the far half, while in the last 13 observations 57 animals were in the near half to only 86 in the far half. Experiment XI. — This was a continuation of experiment X on the following day. The water at starting was 5.5° C. and was raised, after observation 12 to 23° by the addition of warm water. The first 7 observations were at somewhat irreg- ular intervals of ten minutes; the remaining observations were at five-minute intervals. In 30 observations 149 animals faced the light to 154 that faced in the opposite direction; while 143 were noted in the near end to 198 in the distant end. In the first 12 observations, however, when the maximum temperature of the water was 11°, only 43 animals faced the light to 73 that faced away from it; while in the last 18 observations, when the water had been raised to 23°, 106 animals faced the light to 62 that faced the other way. Again, in the first 12 obser- vations 48 animals were in the near half to 94 in the far half, while in the last 18 observations the numbers were 95 to 104 respectively. In a total of 98 observations for the last three experiments, 405 animals faced the light to 532 that faced in the opposite direction; and 390 animals were counted in the near half of the aquarium to 676 that were found in the far half. From the last three experiments it seems that low tempera- tures tend to inhibit or even reverse the positive phototaxis of Diemyctylus as seen in movements towards the light and orientation of the body so that the animal faces the light. Experiment XII. — This experiment was to determine the responses of Diemyctylus to white lights of different intensities acting simultaneously at opposite ends of the aquarium. Nine of the same animals used in the preceding experiments were employed here; they had been in darkness for 15 days. The same aquarium in the same dark room was used; it was LIGHT REACTIONS OF NEWT 41 entirely covered with black cloth except at the ends where the light entered. Two 25-watt, 155-volt tungsten lights were used; they were not tested as to candle-power, but they were of the same supposed power and were of the same age. One light was six inches from one end of the aquarium, the other light was twenty-four inches from the other end. The first 50 obser- vations were taken at five-minute intervals, except that one and one-half hours intervened between observations 31 and 32, during which time the animals were in the darkness. In 50 observations 265 animals were seen facing the more distant (24 inches) light to 170 that faced the nearer and, there- fore, more powerful light. Two hundred and sixty-nine animals were found in the half of the aquarium nearer the more distant light, 174 in the region towards the nearer light. The weaker of these two lights, then, seems to have the greater attraction for the animals. Experiment XIII. — The arrangements were exactly as in ex- periment XII except that the lights were six inches and twelve inches from their respective ends of the aquarium. Two and one-half hours in darkness intervened between observations 19 and 20. In 40 observations 141 animals were found facing the nearer (6 inches) light to 185 that faced the more distant light; while 163 were found in the half of the aquarium towards the nearer light, to 190 in the other half. The weaker of the two lights seems again to be the more attractive to the animals, though in a less marked degree than in experiment XII. Experiment XIV. — The same experimental conditions as in the preceding except that the lights were twelve inches and forty-eight inches from their respective ends. Between obser- vations 15 and 16 was an interval of three days, and between observations 45 and 46 was an interval of one day; during both intervals the animals were in the dark. As in the preceding ex- periment, the observations were taken every five minutes. In 60 observations 289 animals were found facing the nearer (12 inches) light, to 229 that faced the farther (48 inches) light. Two hundred and eighty-three were seen in the half of the aquarium towards the nearer light, to 255 in the other half. It seems that, while the differences between these sets of figures 42 A. M. REESE are not great, the nearer (12 inches) light has a somewhat greater attraction than the more distant (48 inches) light. Experiment XV. — The conditions of this experiment were ex- actly the same as in the preceding except that the lights were twenty-four inches and seventy-two inches from their respec- tive ends. There was an interval of twenty-one hours (in the dark) between observations 5 and 6. In 40 observations 203 animals faced the nearer (24 inches) light, to 133 that faced the farther (72 inches) light ; and 204 were in the half of the aquarium towards the nearer light, to 144 in the other half. Experiments XII to XV may thus be placed in tabular form for comparison: f 6" distance. Experiment XII.. 24" distance. { 6" distance. [facing 170 [near 174 ffacing 265 (near 269 ffacing 141 Experiment XIII • 12" distance. Experiment XIV. 12" distance. ■\ 48" distance. '24" distance. Experiment XV ■ 72" distance . near 163 (facing 185 near 190 ffacing 289 near 283 ffacing 229 near 255 ffacing 203 near 204 ffacing 133 near 144 Experiments XII and XIII seem to indicate that when -one of two sources of light is very intense the animals tend towards the less intense light; while experiments XIV and XV show that when neither source is very intense, perhaps not reaching a certain optimum, the animals tend towards the more intense light. LIGHT REACTIONS OF NEWT 43 REACTIONS TO RED LIGHT Experiment XVI. — In this experiment the same nine animals and the same arrangement of apparatus as in experiment V were employed; but between the tungsten lamp, placed six inches from the end of the aquarium, and the aquarium was a filter composed of two glass jars each 20 mm. thick containing an aqueous solution of crystal violet and of potassium monochro- mate respectively, after the formula of Landholt. In 30 observations, taken at five-minute intervals, 225 ani- mals were noted facing the red light to 46 facing away from the light; and 221 animals were found in the end of the aquarium nearer the light to 49 in the farther end. Experiment XVII. — This experiment was an exact repetition of experiment XVI, made thirty days later, during which period the animals had been in the darkness of the photographic dark room. In 12 observations, at five-minute intervals, 86 animals faced the red light to 19 that faced in the opposite direction; and 82 were seen in the red end of the aquarium to 26 in the other end. Comparison of experiments XVI and XVII with experiment V shows that the proportion of animals attracted by the light was greater with the red light than with the white. This may have been due to the decrease in intensity rather than to the red color. REACTIONS TO BLUE LIGHT Experiment XVIII. — This experiment was performed thirty- six hours after experiment XVII ; during the interval the animals were in complete darkness. The experiment differed from the other only in the substitution of a blue filter for the red. This filter consisted of two similar glass jars containing solutions of crystal violet and copper sulphate after Landholt 's formulae. The five-minute intervals between observations were somewhat lengthened on four occasions by interruptions to the experiment. In 30 observations 197 animals were found facing the blue light to 73 that faced away from it; 195 animals were found in the half of the aquarium near the light to 84 in the other half. It is evident that the proportion of animals attracted by the blue light is less than was attracted by the red light. 44 . A. M. REESE REACTIONS TO GREEN LIGHT Experiment XIX. — The arrangement of this experiment dif- fered from the last only in the substitution of a green filter for the blue. This filter consisted of solutions of copper chloride and potassium monochromate, after the formulae of Landholt, in jars like those described in the two preceding experiments. The same nine animals were used; they had been in total dark- ness for twenty-nine days, and had been fed upon earthworms the day before the experiment. In 30 observations, at five- minute intervals, 210 animals faced the green light to 51 that faced away from it; and 199 animals were found in the near half of the aquarium to 71 in the half farther from the light. The attraction of the green light is apparently more marked than the blue but less marked than the red. REACTIONS TO WHITE LIGHT ON VARIOUS PARTS OF THE BODY Experiment XX. — In order to be able to throw a small, sharply- defined spot of white light on any part of an animal a small electric bulb was mounted in the tube of a microscope, as de- scribed by Bradley M. Patten in Science, January 22, 1915, pp. 141-2. By using different low-power objectives a sharply defined spot from 1 to 5 mm. in diameter was directed upon all parts of the body of several animals. These animals were in a black rubber developing tray in sufficient water to cover them. In one case they had been in a dark room only an hour; in another series of trials they had been in the dark for a week or more. Some of the animals were of the lighter shade with very bright crimson spots; other animals were of the darker type when experimented upon. During experimentation just enough light was admitted to the dark room to faintly see the animals, so that any movement could be noted. The spot of light was thrown, as has been said, on all parts of the body, from the head to the tip of the tail ; on the crimson spots and between them ; it was varied in diameter from 1 to 5 mm. No certain reactions could be determined for any of the animals used. Doubtful reactions were sometimes obtained when the spot was made large enough to cover the entire anterior half of the head. When the spot was thrown on the black bottom of the tray near the animals they followed it actively and snapped at it, evidently taking it for food; they seemed to be able to see the spot at a maximum distance of about 3 cm. LIGHT REACTIONS OF NEWT 45 Experiment XXI. — The same animals that failed to respond to the white spot from the microprojection apparatus responded promptly when a beam of sunlight was thrown, by a small mirror, upon various parts of the body. When the light was thrown upon the tail they either started forwards suddenly or drew the tail sharply forward along the side of the body. When the light was thrown upon the head the animal usually backed away from it. Animals in a cloth covered aquarium in a brightly lighted room responded about as promptly as those in the dark room. Animals that had been for some time in the dark responded more promptly than those that had been exposed to the light; some of the former fairly jumped when the beam fell upon them. Little or no response was obtained when a small beam from a 5 mm. mirror was used instead of a beam that was large enough to illuminate a large area of the animal at one time. The animals responded in the same way, and almost as prompt- ly, to a beam of light from below. These reactions to a beam of sunlight are quite similar to those described by the author for Necturus (2). SUMMARY 1. Under the conditions of these experiments Diemyctylus is almost always markedly negative in its phototropic reactions to white light, at ordinary temperatures. 2. At temperatures near 0° C. and 36° C. Diemyctylus is indifferent to white light from above. 3. The above reactions are the same whether the light fall from above or come from below, though they are usually less marked in the latter case. 4. Diemyctylus is positively phototactic to lights of all in- tensities, from very weak daylight to an intense arc light. - 5. At low temperatures this phototactic reaction is inhibited or reversed. 6. With an intense white light at each end of the aquarium the animals tend towards the less intense light; if neither light be of great intensity, perhaps not reaching a certain optimum, the animals tend towards the more intense light. 7. Phototactic reaction to pure red light was the same as to white light, possible a little more marked. 46 A. M. REESE 8. The reaction to green light is the same as to the red, but less marked. 9. The reaction to blue light is the same, but still less marked. 10. A small spot of white light from a micro-electric torch produced no effect when thrown upon various parts of the animal's body. 11. The animals responded promptly to a beam of sunlight thrown on various parts of the body, either from above or below, by a small mirror, though if the mirror threw a beam of 5 sq. mm. or less there was little or no response. REFERENCES 1. Pearse, A. S. The Reactions of Amphibians to Light. Proc. Amer. Acad. 1910. Arts and Sc, 45, pp. 162-206. 2. Reese, A. M. Observations on the Reactions of Cryptobranchus and Nec- 1906. turus to Light and Heat. Biol. Bull., 11, pp. 93-99. 3. Sayle, Mary Honora. The Reactions of Necturus to Stimuli Received Through 1916. the Skin. Jour. Animal Behav., 6, pp. 81-102. ADDENDUM As a check upon the preceding laboratory experiments, the following experiments were tried upon a number of newts of the same species, under as near natural conditions as could be obtained. The work was done, during the latter part of August, in a small, fresh-water pond, about two miles from the labora- tory at Woods Hole, Mass. Twenty-eight animals were obtained by sweeping a dip net through the grass of this shallow pond. They were caught during the morning, and were confined until night, and during intervals between experiments, in a 12 in. x 12 in. floating live- box, with wire top and bottom, which was partly filled with grass and dirt from the pond. During experimentation they were confined in a cage 1 ft. x 2 ft. in area, 6 inches deep, and open above, made of one-quarter inch wire netting. This cage was sunk about 5 inches into the water so that it was surrounded by the grass of the pond. A few of the animals escaped, during the experiments, by climbing out of the cage. Only sunlight and artificial white light were used, the latter being supplied by a miner's acetylene lamp with a reflector; this lamp gave a fairly brilliant though rather variable light, but its candle-power was not determined. LIGHT REACTIONS OF NEWT 47 Experiment XXII. — This experiment was performed during a fairly dark, moonless night. One-half of the wire cage was covered with a board, while the other half was brilliantly illu- minated by the acetylene lamp, fixed about 10 inches above the surface of the water. Fifteen observations, at 5 -minute intervals, were taken, during which 65 animals were noted in the light half of the cage to 355 in the darkened half of the cage, — a proportion of more than five to one. This proportion would have been still greater but for the fact that after obser- vations 2, 6 and 11 the light and dark ends were suddenly re- versed, thus throwing the larger group of animals into the light area. Experiment XXIII. — In this experiment the same cage and animals were used, but the light was bright sunlight. Of course, on account of the diffused light, the shaded half of the cage was not nearly so dark as in the preceding experiment. In 16 observations, at 5-minute intervals, 103 animals were counted in the light half of the cage to 297 in the dark; this proportion of nearly three to one would have been greater but for the sud- den reversal of light and dark ends after observations 9 and 12. It is evident, then, from experiments XXII and XXIII, that under these conditions the negative phototropism to white light is even more marked than in the laboratory experiments. Experiment XXIV. — In this experiment the acetylene light was placed in a large, glass aquarium jar, which was sunk into the water of the pond so that the light was thrown into one end of the wire cage, the observations being made, of course, at night. This arrangement was not very satisfactory, as the dark color of the pond-water made the illumination of the far end of the cage very dim. In 26 observations, at 5-niinute intervals, 213 animals were noted in the half of the cage nearer the light to 263 in the farther half. After observations 9, 20, and 22, since it was difficult to reverse the ends of the cage, all the animals were pushed into the light half; this tended to decrease the excess of those in the dark end; but the experiment was hardly conclusive, perhaps on ac- count of the unsatisfactory conditions. Experiment XXV. — This experiment was performed with the clear sun shining down upon the end of the submerged cage, at an angle varying from 40 to 25 with the surface of the pond. 48 A. M. REESE The cage being uncovered, the light was evenly distributed over the bottom, but entered, as said, from one end. Under these conditions, in 16 observations, at 5-minute intervals, 191 animals were noted in the half of the cage towards the sun, to 120 animals in the other half. After observations 8, 11, and 14 all the ani- mals were gently pushed to the center of the cage, which dimin- ished the preponderance of those in the half towards the sun. This experiment seems to indicate that, where the light is suf- ficiently bright, the animals tend to go towards it, as in the laboratory experiments. These outdoor experiments, then, seem to substantiate, so far as they go, the results of the laboratory experiments. THE INTERFERENCE OF AUDITORY HABITS IN THE WHITE RAT WALTER S. HUNTER ASSISTED BY JOS. U. YARBROUGH The University of Texas The present paper has grown out of the work which one of the authors has already published on audition in the rat.1 On pages 324-5 of the last of these a report is made of some tests on the retention of auditory habits. It was these tests that gave us our cue. Negative results only had been secured by attempting to train rats to turn in one direction through a box when a tone or a chord was sounded and to turn in the opposite direction when silence was given. This was a direct attack upon the problem of tone sensitivity by the association method. It occurred to us that working indirectly through habit interfer- ence further data of value might be secured. By such a method one could redetermine whether for the rat certain tones are equivalent to silence. Should such a method succeed, its data would be similar to that secured by the conditioned reflex method. In the present paper we shall deal only with the tests bearing upon habit interference. An immediately succeeding article will stress the auditory sensitivity data secured by this method and combine them with other observations from this laboratory. The same T-shaped discrimination box was used here that has been described in the previous papers. The buzzer was held on a wire over the apparatus in the same location indi- cated for the tuning forks. The initial plan (which was much supplemented as will be seen) called for 20 rats as follows: A. 20 rats train to turn rt. for handclaps, 1ft. for silence. B. 4 rats of set A train for 30 days to turn rt. for buzzer. 1 Hunter, Walter S. The auditory sensitivity of the white rat. Journal Animal Behavior, vol. 4, p. 215, 1914, and vol. 5, p. 312, 1915. 50 WALTER S. HUNTER AND JOS. U. YARBROUGH C. 4 rats of set A train for 30 days to turn rt. for tuning fork 256 d. v. D. 4 rats of set A train for 30 days to turn 1ft. for tuning fork 256 d. v. E. 4 rats of set A train for 30 days on regular series of pre- sentations on auditory stimulus. F. 4 rats of set A tested for retention after 30 days rest. G. Rats of sets B, C, D, E retested on handicaps. This program calls for a measure of the relative retention of a simple co-ordination in five groups of animals, each group having been kept under different conditions for an interval of thirty days. Only 18 rats completed the work of set A. Of these 13 were females (numbers 1, 4, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24), and 5 were females (numbers 7, 8, 17, 22, 23). All were about three months old at the beginning of the tests. With the excep- tion of nos. 1 and 4, they were untrained. No. 1 had been trained on the inclined plane problem box. No. 4 had worked with light in a two-choice discrimination box. Nos. a, b, c, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, whose records are given below, were also about three months old at the beginning of the tests. All of these animals were females. The tests here reported, like most studies of animal learning, have been long and tedious. They have ex- tended from January, 1915, to June, 1916. Prior to the regular tests, each rat was fed on the experiment table and was permitted to run through the box on each of two days. Care was taken that no position habits were developed. Those rats that manifested a preference for a certai n side of the box were immediately forced through the opposite side. Discrimination was regarded as established when the average percentage of correct reactions for four days together was 87|% with no one day's record below 80%. II Learning the first habit. — Table 1 gives the total number of trials required by each rat to set up the habit of running to the right for handclaps and to the left for silence. The period of learning is the period up to the 40 trials made at the standard per cent. The rats underscored are males. Figure 1 shows INTERFERENCE OF HABITS IN THE WHITE RAT 51 the distribution curve. All but six of the rats had mastered the problem within 500 trials. I am inclined to attribute the irregularities largely to position habits which appeared during the learning and which had to be overcome. Fear caused by- punishment retarded the last part of the learning in rats 25-29. No sex differences appear. The form of the learning curve will be shown in section VIII. TABLE 1 Number of Trials per Rat in Learning First Habit Rat Trials Rat Trials Rat Trials 1 4 260 210 16 17 260 300 a b 350 420 7 430 18 450 c 460 8 500 19 450 25 420 9 10 11 300 390 370 20 21 22 710 610 620 26 27 28 550 320 610 14 370 23 470 29 570 15 360 24 260 Each rat of set A, when it had completed its four days with a general average of 87 J%, was given three controls, each of which in general alternated with a day on the normal stimulus of handclaps. Control 1 — no stimulus was given. The reac- tion was counted correct if it agreed with the series of presenta- tions. This control was to test the animal's dependence upon extra-auditory cues. Control 2 — an electric buzzer was sounded in place of the handclaps. This control was given to each rat on each of four successive days (40 trials). Control 3 — a tuning fork, 256 d. v., placed over the apparatus as described in pre- vious papers, was sounded by striking with a felt hammer. This tone was substituted by the experimenter for the handclaps. The necessity for the first control needs no comment. Con- trols 2 and 3 were used in order to determine the relation of the respective stimuli to the habit just established. It is very im- portant, if interference effects are to be studied, that the mutual relations of the stimuli (i.e., their transfer relations) be known, — in the present case, whether the buzzer and the tuning fork would be substituted readily for the handclapping in this par- ticular co-ordination. The results of control 1 indicate that the animals were depend- ing upon auditory cues. Only one rat's (No. 17) record was 52 WALTER S. HUNTER AND JOS. U. YARBROUGH n 100 ito 300 yoo n fl JH rs ito (,00 too Figure 1. — Distribution curve of the original learning the least ambiguous. The accompanying table (No. 2), how- ever, will show that an extended use of the control produced low percentages. Control 2, where the buzzer was substituted, gave the following results: On the first day, 7 rats (Nos. 15, 18, 20, 22, 9, 10, 11) made below 80%. On the second day, 5 rats (Nos. 20, 22, 10, 11, 14) made below 80%. On the third day, 3 rats (Nos. 21, 8, 11) made below 80%. On the fourth day, Nos. 9 and 14 fell below 80%. Seven rats (Nos. 1, 4, 7, 16, 17, 19, 23) never fell below 80%. The adjustment or trans- fer was thus usually made either at once or by the end of the second day. On control 3, 6 rats at different times made a day's record with 80% correct. This occurred, however, with a majority of days at 50, 60 and 70% and is to be regarded not as evidence of auditory sensitivity, but as an accident in the grouping of kinaesthetic factors. TABLE 2 Records on Controls Giving Correct Choices Out of 10 The text states that not all records are from successive days Rat 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 14 Con. 1 6,5, 6 7, 4 5 8! 5, 7, 8, 6, 5 5, 6, 6 4,5,7 6, 6, 6 6, 6, 5 6, 5, 5 5, 5, 7 6.5, 6 6,7,5 7, 7, 6 5, 6, 6 6.6, 6 6,3,4 5, 3, 5 6, 5, 6 Con. 2 5, 10, 8, 8 8, 9, 10, 8 8, 9, 8, 9 6, 8, 9, 10 10, 10, 9, 9 7, 5, 10, 9 9, 9, 6, 9 7, 6, 8, 10 8, 8, 9, 9 10, 8 9, 10, 8, 9 9, 10, 8, 8 9, 8, 7, 8 6, 8, 9, 6 7, 5, 8, 10 7, 5, 6, 9 8, 7, 9, 6 Con. 3 7,6, 7 6, 6, 8, 6 8, 7, 7, 10, 7, 7 8, 9, 5, 8, 5 6, 7, 8, 7 6, 6, 5 7, 6, 7 6, 7, 4 7, 8, 7, 7 6,5,5 6,7,5 5,7,7 6,6,7 5,6, 5 7, 6, 6 7, 6, 8, 6 5,6,7 INTERFERENCE OF HABITS IN THE WHITE RAT 53 Table 2 presents the results for these controls. The four days' records preceding control 1 were made at or above 87^% correct. Each day's record with controls 1 and 3 alternated with a day on the normal stimulus (handclaps) save when 80% was made. In these cases the same control was used on the suc- ceeding day. Ill Thirty-day Tests. — After control 3 had been given, each rat of set A received the normal stimulus for four days or until the standard 87 \°/0 was reached. The animals were now started upon the interference periods (B-E) as outlined above for 300 trials or 30 days. No rat learned his problem within this period. Only one rat (No. 15) made 80% during any one-sixth (50 trials) of the period. This rat made 82% during the third 50 and 84% during the fourth 50 trials. (These are general averages for the 50 trials.) After this he broke down, so that on the final sixth 50% only was made. There is no available explanation for this. Neither fear nor position habits intervened. It is one of those anomalous cases that will occur. (It took this rat 180 trials to relearn the normal habit. This, however, cannot be corre- lated with the high percentage in the interference period because long periods of relearning appeared in other rats where the high percentages were absent.) Each of the succeeding 50 trials for the rats in these sets averaged practically between 50 and 65%. Table 3 contains a record of the number of correct reactions in each 50 trials made by each rat during the 30 days. TABLE 3 Trials Correct in Each 50 During the 30-day Test and the Relearning 30-day training Sets B C D E F Rats 15 23 7 11 1 17 18 16 14 10 20 9 19 21 4 24 8 22 28 31 13 20 28 32 29 35 29 27 26 24 28 14 32 34 19 25 26 27 27 43 33 26 32 24 28 15 41 29 23 24 23 26 24 34 33 35 24 27 30 19 42 33 26 30 20 31 26 33 35 27 26 25 33 21 31 17 24 19 27 21 28 35 26 32 29 30 28 21 25 28 27 20 23 29 24 33 28 28 29 29 27 19 54 WALTER S. HUNTER AND JOS. U. YARBROUGH Relearning 36 35 24 33 of 36 41 40 of 39 . . 40 46 37 38 35 .. 42 37 10 .. 41 35 of .. 9 37 10 ... of 40 . . 38 39 44 35 .. of 10 of .. 40 of 40 . . . . 10 34 37 45 of of 9 40 40 of . . . . 10 37 of 40 45 33 29 . . 37 39 .. 40 27 42 of 9 .. .. 41 30 of . . .. 10 18 .. 16 10 . . . . . . of of . . . . 20 20 Total trials on relearning 210 40 90 50 160 270 60 50 40 60 40 40 40 60 40 50 270 130 On the day following the close of the 30-day period each rat was retested on handclaps to the right. The results are in- cluded in table 3. Our criterion of the degree of retention has been the length of the period of relearning rather than the per cent of correct reactions on the first day. Table 4 shows that in the present case there is no way of predicting the amount of relearning from the percentages made on the first days. It will be seen from table 3 that all sets of rats are essentially on a par with respect to retention. In other words, so far as these rats are concerned, 30 days of diverse training has not produced effects in retention. TABLE 4 F stands for number of trials correct in first 10 of relearning. T is the total relearning time in trials. B D E Rat F T Rat F Rat F T Rat F Rat F 7 15 23 5 90 3 210 8 40 1 5 60 11 10 50 17 7 270 18 2 160 10 8 40 14 10 40 16 8 50 20 8 40 9 19 21 7 40 9 40 9 60 4 9 40 8 7 270 22 2 130 24 7 50 IV Sixty-day Rats. — Four rats (Nos. 1, 11, 17, 18) had- been tested in the work outlined above. During the 30-day period an effort was made to train them to turn right for the tuning fork 256 d. v. without success. These rats were then idle, al- INTERFERENCE OF HABITS IN THE WHITE RAT 55 though kept in good physical condition, for the following inter- vals of time: Nos. 1 and 11 went 10 days; No. 17 went 23 days; and No. 18 went 40 days. At the close of these intervals of time, all of the rats were brought back to the standard percent- age of correct reactions on turning to the right for handclaps. They were then put into training again on going right for 256 d. v. and left for silence. They remained in this series for 600 trials, 10 per day, punishment and reward. No. 11 was the only rat of the four that improved during the 60 days. He learned the reaction in 270 trials. The senior author was away for the summer at this time and no control tests were made to determine the basis of the response. Inasmuch, however, as no other rat in the laboratory has learned to react to tone in this fashion since the work was begun in 1913, and inasmuch as this rat learned rapidly, it is most probable that the reaction was due to secondary cues accompanying the tone. This ex- periment is confirmatory of work previously published indicat- ing the insensitivity of the rat to certain tones. At the close of the 600 trials, retention tests for handclaps to the right were given. No. 1 came back to standard in 10 trials; No. 17, in 60; and No. 18, in 30. This is practically perfect retention and is as good a record as that made by the 30-day rats. The results are practically comparable, although not absolutely so inasmuch as the 60-day animals were some- what overtrained relatively on h. c. to the right. The same results with the same limitations were secured with rats 4, 8, 22 and 24. These were the rats listed under F in the 30-day tests. The retention tests in that series brought these animals back to the standard. They were then idle for 60 days at the close of which period they were again retested on h. c. to the right. Rat No. 4 came back to standard in 20 trials; No. 8, immediately; No. 22, in 30 trials; and No. 24, in 40. In order to compare the results given here and in the above paragraph with those listed under ' ' Total trials on re- learning " in table 3, it is necessary to subtract 40 from each of the totals in that table. The results given in the present sec- tion are the number of trials up to the 40 made at the standard per cent. Rats Nos. 7, 15 and 23 had been through the 30-day tests in set B, — turn left for the buzzer. After intervals of rest as 56 WALTER S. HUNTER AND JOS. U. YARBROUGH follows they were brought back to standard on handclaps: No. 7, 9 days; No. 15, 38 days; and No. 23, 47 days. They were now retrained on going to the left for the buzzer and to the right for silence. The intention was to train them upon this for 60 days, unless the habit was established sooner, and then test their retention of h. c. to the right. Rat No. 7 learned in 54 days, 540 trials; No. 23 learned in 35 days, 350 trials; and No. 15 learned in 45 days, 450 trials. If we add to this only the 300 trials which they had previously had on the same prob- lem in the 30-day test, No. 7 learned in 840 trials; No. 15, in 750 trials; and No. 23, in 650 trials. At the close of the 40 trials at the standard percentage for rats 7, 15 and 23 as just noted, they were retested on h. c. to the right. No one of the three fell below 80% for 30 trials. In other words, there was perfect retention. When given con- trol 1 — tests made without the auditory stimulus — the per- centages ranged between 30 and 50. On one day and with only one rat did it go as high as 70%. So there could be no doubt that the rats were dependent upon the auditory stimulus. Here we have a case where two opposite habits are present simul- taneously in the organism although the respective stimuli were not originally differentiated. The process of the differentiation has been a successive formation of habits and not a simulta- neous one as is usual in discrimination tests. And the inter- esting thing is that the formation of the second (and opposite) habit has not interfered with the retention of the first habit. A second automatism has arisen gradually and independently of the first. Further tests were made upon rat No. 7 to determine the nature of the difference between the buzzer and the handclaps. These results will be published in a separate paper. V Ninety-day Rats. — Three untrained rats, Nos. a, b and c, were trained to go right for handclaps and left for silence. The number of trials required in learning is shown in table 1. At the close of this series, control 1 was alternated with normal for three days in order to be sure that the animals were not depending upon extra-auditory cues. The percentages were all around 50. These three rats were then given a period of idleness for 90 days. During this period, they remained in INTERFERENCE OF HABITS IN THE WHITE RAT 57 splendid physical condition for experimentation. At the close of the period, they were retested on h. c. to the right. It is needless to give the data in detail. No one of these rats aver- aged above 70% for any 50 trials although their retraining ex- tended through from 34 to 45 days. Their behavior at the beginning of the retesting indicated that the apparatus and method were still familiar to them, but that was all. The re- sults as a whole indicate that these rats had lost all measurable traces of the original training. It may be well that in a habit so difficult as the present one continued or retained familiarity is too slight an aid to manifest itself in shortening the period of relearning. The disintegration of this habit in the white rat apparently takes place between 60 and 90 days. The 60- day tests indicated practically perfect retention at the close of that period, but the two sets of data are not strictly com- parable. The rats in the 60-day tests had been retrained at different intervals on h. c. to the right after the original learn- ing. Hence the habit was considerably overlearned. VI Effect on retention of learned vs. unlearned habits. — It would be interesting to know just what went on in the rats' nervous systems during the 30 and 60-day periods of training. We seem forced to assume that certain synaptic connections have per- sisted in spite of the attempts of incoming stimuli to disintegrate them. Inasmuch as either continued training (?) or the lapse of time will result in the disintegration of these connections, definite problems arise under each condition. We have indi- cated that with the mere lapse of time, the dissolution of the particular habit in our rats occurred between 60 and 90 days. The present section contributes data throwing light upon the comparative disintegrations brought about in the h. c. habit by the 30 days' ineffective training on B and by a period of training during which B was mastered. Of the 18 rats used on the 30-day test described above, 9 made the standard 87 \°/0 immediately upon being re-tested on h. c. to the right. Four others did essentially as well. Two hundred and seventy trials was the maximum period of re- learning and was found in two rats. Table 3 gave the data in 58 WALTER S. HUNTER AND JOS. U. YARBROUGH detail. It will also be recalled that no one of these rats im- proved during his 30-days' training upon B. Three untrained rats, Nos. 26, 27 and 29, formed the original h. c. habit as indicated in table 1. They were then trained on B until it was mastered. (I shall discuss certain details of this training in a following section.) At the close of the 4 days on B made at 87|%, these rats were retested on h. c. The results for all save the original learning are given in table 5. TABLE 5 Correct in successive 50 trials in learning B No. 25 No. 26 No. 27 No. 29 14 15 15 5 10 15 19 20 18 20 22 18 17 12 38 21 18 22 36 21 19 21 33 19 20 22 30 17 22 20 34 24 25 29 33 32 28 32 38 36 * 28 37 34 29 30 37 36 31 29 34 32 34 31 38 38 35 34 39 38 36 34 37 15 of 20 39 42 38 32 Unfinished 32 41 7 of 10 13 of 2 Correct in each 50 in retest on h. c. 29 36 26 31 36 35 30 32 24 31 33 33 36 38 34 24 of 30 41 8 of 10 8 of 10 No 26 required 280 trials for the re-learning here in question. No. 27 required 310; and No. 29, 260 trials. The intervals for 26 and 29 are a little too small inasmuch as these two rats grew sick and died. Each, however, had reached 80% correct and so was within 7|% of the standard. The indications, from this test are that marked progress must be made in the formation of a second contradictory habit before the retention of a first habit is noticeably affected. This can be represented graph- INTERFERENCE OF HABITS IN THE WHITE RAT 59 ically as indicated in figure 2. The three lines to the left are based upon rats 26, 27 and 29. The three lines to the right are based upon the 18 rats of the 30-day test. The first line in each column represents the average number of trials in learn- ing the original h. c. habit; the second line, the trials given on habit B; and the third line, the re-learning time. The de- tailed data have already been given in the tables. The rats represented in the right hand column averaged about 5 months old at the beginning of the relearning tests. This was approx- imately 2 months younger than the other set of animals at the corresponding point of their tests. Both sets were composed w m he - 8 gfe& 300 he m - 1™ tW 50 Figure 2. — Effects on retention of learned vs. unlearned habits. of active animals, however, and in view of the marked difference in results as compared with Hubbert's,2 1 am inclined to discount age as an important factor in determining the present data. A comparison between these data and the results' of the 90- day test points the way toward interesting interpretations. The 90-day rats had lost all measurable traces of the original h. c. habit whereas rats 26, 27 and 29 relearned within an average of 260 trials or 26 days. These three rats had spent 85 days on habit B. Unless these are accidental variations, then, it would seem that the training on B favored the retention of h. c. The rats seemed equal in physical fitness for the tests. If we now consider the relations of the data given in figure 1, it would seem that the loss in retention of the first habit is prob- ably caused as much or more by the lapse of time than by the forma- tion of the contradictory habit. It was found in the 30-day test that training had no greater effect on retention than lack of training. It is thus suggested, although not clearly proved by our tests, that the disintegration of certain habits in the rat is due to a temporal factor and not to habit interference. 2 Hubbert, H. B. The effect of age on habit formation in the albino rat. Be- havior Monographs, 2, no. 6, 1915. 60 WALTER S. HUNTER AND JOS. U. YARBROUGH VII The Strength of Habit.— Rats 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29, whose learning periods were described in the first section of the paper, were further tested as follows: At the close of the 40 trials at 87 1% made on the first h. c. habit, each rat was given control 1 on three days alternating with the normal. All of the rats failed to respond correctly in this control. They were then each given two consecutive days on control 2 (buzzer substi- tuted for h. c). In case a rat fell below 80%, a day with the normal stimulus was interpolated. The results are in table 6. TABLE 6 No. 25 No. 26 No. 27 No. 28 No. 29 9 10 9 8 8 8 6 8 9 8 3 8 9 7 8 8 8 7 8 8 H.C.. Con. 2. H. C. Con. 2. Con. 2. H. C It will be seen from this that rat 26 did not rate the buzzer as identical with the handclaps and that No. 29 failed also, but on the first day only. No 28 became sick on the third day and was dropped from the tests. At the close of the tests in the above table, Nos. 25, 26, 27 and 29 were immediately started on learning "buzzer to left, right for silence " which was the opposite habit to the extent shown in the table. The progress of learning B in successive fifties was shown in table 5. The very important point that I wish to emphasize is that no one of these four rats learned in less than 770 trials while two were as high as 910 and 920. It took these rats approximately twice as long to break the h. c. habit as it had to form it. The figures are: No. 25, h. c. habit-420, buzzer habit-850 (?); No. 26, h. c. habit-550, buzzer habit-910; No. 27, h. c. habit-320, buzzer habit-770; No. 29, h. c. habit-570, buzzer habit-920. These figures exhibit in a striking manner the tenacity of habits in the rat. The original habit need not be literally broken, how- ever, because in each case a period of retraining reinstated it. The situation is probably more accurately described by saying that the first h. c. habit interfered with the formation of the buzzer habit, although the latter but slightly (if at all) affected INTERFERENCE OF HABITS IN THE WHITE RAT 61 the former. The amount of the interference will probably depend much upon the ease of discrimination between the stimuli for the two habits. We are not prepared to contribute upon this point. (Because the rats ranked the buzzer as the same as handclaps we have felt justified in assuming that un- trained rats would learn " buzzer to the left ' as readily as " hand claps to the right.") Mrs. Binnie Pearce, in research from this laboratory as yet unpublished, found even more striking interference in visual habits. Using the same T-shaped box, she trained rats to run one way for light and the other way for darkness. When she then attempted to train them to reverse this behavior, the task was found all but impossible. We are not familiar with any other work where an animal has had to learn the opposite of a previously acquired habit. There are many cases where different habits have been set up in succession and where interference has been more or less ex- plicit. However, in order to secure comparable data, it is neces- sary that the stimuli be known and the responses simple. The study of interference in mazes, latch boxes, etc., suffers for this reason. Not only must the stimulus be known in the case of the first habit, but the second stimulus must be known physi- cally and also physiologically in terms of the first one. Thus one can know whether or not the stimulus for the second habit is for the subject in that situation the same as the first stimulus (positive transfer). Where the type of habit set up is kinaes- thetic as opposed to auditory or visual, the control of the stim- ulus is very difficult because the stimulus lies in the animal's movements. The most feasible procedure is to reduce the problem to such an extent that only one or two prominent kin- aesthetic experiences are presented. The senior author is work- ing upon this problem at the present time, although interference is but one phase of the study. VIII Relative rates of error elimination in interfering habits. — With particular reference to the 30-day rats and rats 25-29, it is of interest to raise the following question: In what parts of the learning curves does the interference, as measured by the rela- tive rates of error elimination, occur? 62 WALTER S. HUNTER AND JOS. U. YARBROUGH Table 7 gives data for rats 25, 26, 27 and 29. The numbers represent the percentages correct in each succeeding one-tenth of the learning process.3 The first columns for each rat are TABLE 7 25 26 27 29 Av. 50 23 54 29 50 31 50 23 51 26 57 34 63 29 50 45 70 39 60 36 57 37 38 35 43 75 64 42 50 47 57 38 60 45 59 64 68 35 50 45 78 50 54 49 43 64 61 58 59 55 66 53 72 67 59 70 64 64 65 63 64 60 61 71 75 68 70 64 67 65 59 59 76 73 65 71 77 69 69 68 59 68 76 75 75 71 82 82 73 74 78 76 74 71 81 75 66 75 74 74 87.5 90 87.5 87.5 90 87.5 90 90 88 88 the records for learning the original h. c. habit. The second columns are the records for learning B. These figures are secured as follows: No. 25, e.g., learned h. c. in 420 trials. This is divided into 10 parts of 42 each. Of the first 42, 21 or 50% were correct. This method when applied to all members of the group enables us to construct a curve which throughout its length is representative of the group. The bottom numbers in each column of table 7 represent the percentages of correct reactions made in the last 40 trials. Sometimes this runs over the standard 87.5%. The values above S are from the forties made at or above the standard per cent. If the curves of figure 3 are examined, the curve for B is seen to start much lower than the curve for h. c. and to lag markedly behind throughout eight-tenths of the learning. (These curves are plotted from the average values in table 7.) This lag would be even greater, but for the accidental fact that learning h. c. was retarded toward the last by the fear that arose in the rats from punishment. The marked interference of the two habits is seen when the last of h. c. is compared with the first of B, and also when the first parts of the curves are compared. B is more than a new habit. It is interfered with from the start by h. c. 3 This method of treating the learning process is taken from Dr. S. B. Vincent's Function of the vibrissae in the behavior of the white rat. Behavior Monographs, 1, no. 5, p. 17, 1912. INTERFERENCE OF HABITS IN THE WHITE RAT 63 Figure 3. — The relative rates of error elimination in the hand clapping habit and the buzzer habit. Based on rats 25, 26, 27 and 29. TABLE 8 15 23 7 Av. 52 57 57 48 39 46 49 50 52 57 61 65 48 50 53 55 61 64 61 60 51 48 57 57 36 55 70 65 55 53 53 57 63 68 59 54 62 48 61 56 63 75 59 54 69 57 63 62 80 55 76 57 83 . 51 79 52 88 71 76 68 67 55 77 64 83 75 72 ■ 65 86 59 80 66 66 71 78 51 67 61 70 61 95 90 90 90 87.5 90 90 90 Table 8 gives data for rats 15, 23 and 7, used in set B of the 30 and 60-day tests. In this table again the first columns are the original learnings ; the last columns, the learnings of B in the 64 WALTER S. HUNTER AND JOS. U. YARBROUGH 60-day test. These rats had received 300 trials in the 30-day test followed by some intermediate training on h. c. If this data were included in the curves, there would be no variation in their essential relations. If anything the interference would be more apparent. id * 3 f r <> 7 Z ? Figure 4. — Relative rates of error elimination in h. c. and in B. on rats 15, 23 and 7 S Based The curves in figure 4 begin at essentially the same height and go along together throughout the first six-tenths of the learning. It is during the last four-tenths of the curves that the B -curve remains markedly below that for h. c. (There is no evidence that this was caused by fear.) The interference of the two habits is seen here and in a comparison of the last of h. c. and the first of B. In the average B is no more than a new habit with these rats. Its curve begins no lower than that for h. c. The details are further brought out in table 9, which gives the correct responses in each 10 trials of the first INTERFERENCE OF HABITS IN THE WHITE RAT 65 100 trials of the 30-day test with B. It will be seen from this table that there is no essential difference between the initial stages of the two habits. TABLE 9 7 15 23 h. c. B h, c B. h. c. B 5 3 7 3 3 4 3 9 3 5 7 6 3 2 6 7 5 5 5 2 5 8 10 8 2 4 6 5 5 8 4 4 7 5 8 7 4 5 3 5 4 6 7 6 5 7 6 8 6 1 4 7 6 6 3 3 9 8 5 7 , IX Conclusions. — The present paper opens up problems in an all but unexplored field of animal behavior. Keeping in mind the limitations imposed by the number of animals and the type of experiment, the following conclusions may be stated as the more important ones to which our work points: 1. Habit interference occurs in the white rat between a first habit and the formation of a second one. 2. This interference may or may not manifest itself at the beginning of the second habit and may or may not manifest itself later during the second learning. 3. ' Interference ' is most marked between the end of the perfected habit and the beginning of the new habit. In many cases this may show not genuine interference, but merely the beginning of a new habit. 4. Habit interference may serve greatly to slow up the forma- tion of a new habit. Clear evidence of this forward reference has been found. We have brought to light no evidence that learning the second habit as such interferes with the retention of the first habit. 5. It seems clear that in some cases the lapse of time may be more effective than intervening training in disintegrating a habit. THE CRITERION OF LEARNING IN EXPERIMENTS WITH THE MAZE K. S. LASHLEY The Department of Psychology of the Johns Hopkins University In comparative studies of the rate of learning in which ani- mals are trained in the maze the selection of a proper criterion by which to judge the progress of habit-formation in different groups of animals offers a rather difficult problem. There can be little doubt that the ability to thread the maze without error is the final test of learning, but whether a single trial without error, three successive trials as used by Hubbert, or a still larger number of errorless runs should be required before the habit is considered as established has so far been determined largely by the convenience of the experimenter. The question is chiefly one of economy of the experimenter's time, but not wholly so, for, although all animals may become automatic in running the maze after long training, an occasional error still appears and no method of evaluating these has been devised. In some tests dealing with the effects of drugs upon the rate of learning I have recently trained 94 rats in the Watson cir- cular maze, obtaining data which makes possible a limited com- parison of such criteria of learning. The animals were all given five trials per day in the maze with food at the end of each trial. At the beginning of the experiments, as an arbitrary standard of ' perfect learning," a single record of three successive errorless trials on the same day was selected. After this degree of proficiency is once at- tained the animals make very few errors, so that this standard actually represents very nearly the limit of training, but it was chosen simply because it could be attained after about ten days' training. To test the reliability of this standard in estimations of the difference beween groups of animals its results have been com- pared with those of another standard, that of the number of THE CRITERION OF LEARNING 67 trials preceding the first which was made without error. This comparison is best made by correlating the number of trials preceding the first errorless run with the number preceding ' ' perfect learning ' ' for all the animals. The former varied from 10 to 75 with a mean at 23.8±.977, the latter from 10 to 150 with the mean at 47. 3± 2.99; the correlation in the variations of the two is 0.632±0.061. The coefficient of regression of the varia- tions in trials preceding the first errorless run over those pre- ceding " perfect learning " is 1.304, that of variations in " per- fect learning " over first trial is .306. This means that if we are dealing with fairly large numbers of animals and have found a given difference between two groups, as measured by the aver- age number of trials required to make one perfect run, we may expect that the difference in the number of trials required for " perfect learning " will be in the same direction and 1.304 times as great. Conversely, if we know the difference in trials re- quired for " perfect learning " we may predict a difference .306 times as great in the number of trials required for one error- less run. It follows from this correlation that that group of animals which has made the most rapid progress up to the time when the first errorless run is made will continue in the lead until the limits of training are reached; will, indeed, increase that lead. As a test of the application of this principle, the groups of ani- mals which were treated differentially in the experiments have been graded in the order of the average number of trials re- quired by them to attain to each of the two standards. The results of this are shown in table 1. The different methods of rating result in an interchange in the order of some of the groups but in no case is the position of any one group changed by more than one place. The groups included in the table are not all strictly compar- able. The methods of training were the same in every case but some of the groups differed in the heredity and age of their members, in the season during which they were trained, as well as in certain drugs administration during training. In the sepa- rate experiments, all these factors were controlled and the groups a, J, g, and i, c, and d and b, c, h, and j are mutually comparable and differ only in the drugs administered. The order of these by the two criteria of learning is — 68 K. S. LASHLEY " P. L." a f g i: c d: b e h j 1st P. R a g f i: c d: b e h j The order is changed in this case only between the groups f and g, and the difference between them is not great enough to be significant in either case. There is essential agreement in the results obtained by the two criteria. As will be noted in the table and from the coefficients of regression, the difference between the groups is greatest when measured by the difficult standard of three perfect trials.1 Are these differences more significant on this account? At first sight it might seem so. The number of animals considered remains constant and hence, other things being equal, the ratio of the difference to its probable error increases. But the probable errors are dependent also upon the amount of variability and a further analysis of the data shows that the coefficient of varia- tion remains constant or is even increased when the more diffi- cult standard is used. The figures in table 2, which are taken from groups c and d, illustrate this. The probability that the first difference in the table (3.54) is due merely to chance is about 1/3; that the second (4.12) is due to chance is 1/1 or greater. A glance at the probable errors for the averages of all the rats (page 70) shows that these are quite consistent with the results for the smaller groups.2 The coefficient of variation in the number of trials preceeding the first errorless run is .5900, for those preceeding " perfect learning " is .6107 and the prob- able error of the average of the latter is proportionately greater than that of the former . If two such groups were compared by the two criteria the differences obtained would obviously bear the same relation to their probable errors as do those in the smaller groups. The general results of this analysis point to the following conclusions : 1 . Where there is a difference in the average capacity of two groups of animals for habit-formation, the more difficult the problem that they are required to learn the greater will be the apparent difference between the groups in the practice re- 1 Some exceptions occur, but this is to be expected from the small number of animals included in the groups. 2 No great importance could be ascribed to this fact alone as it does not follow that there is any correlation between the variability within the subordinate groups and the variability of all the animals taken together, but the fact that the same results are obtained for both the small and large groups does seem significant. THE CRITERION OF LEARNING 69 quired for learning. 2. With the increasing difficulty of the problem there is an increase in the extent of variation between the members of the same group so that the greater difference between the groups looses its significance through the increase in the probability of chance variation of the averages. 3. Hence there is no advantage, for reliability of results, in prolonged training where the problem is that of a statistical comparison of different groups of animals by a single standard of achievement. These conclusions apply only to a specific technique, but one which has been used extensively in studies of the effect of age, sex, distribution of practice, etc., upon the rate of learning. It may be argued that long training permits the comparative study of the rate of learning at different stages of proficiency. This is quite true, but the analysis of learning curves based upon the averages of several animals has contributed remarkably little to our knowledge of the mechanism of learning and in statistical studies of the sort under discussion there is not time for that detailed analysis of the individual behavior of the subjects which is of value in the interpretation of the form of the learning curve. On the other hand the results of studies of the modifiability of the course of learning by environmental factors are for the most part questionable because of the small number of cases upon which they are based. In many cases differences which are smaller than their probable errors have been regarded as significant, seemingly only because they sup- port the hypothese of the writers. The use of an adequate number of animals is difficult for the reason that the groups to be compared should be trained at the same time to rule out possible seasonal differences, of which we know nothing at present, while only a limited number of animals can be trained by one man at one time. A possible solution of the difficulty is the cooperation of several students upon a single problem but there is not enough data upon the influence of the experimenter's personal equation to permit of this as yet.3 The alternative seems to be the simplification of 3 The use of two or more criteria as in the experiments reported, while reducing the probable errors of the average difference found, removes hereditary and like individual differences from the category of chance variations and places them on an equal footing with the experimental differences (age, sex, or whatever differ- ence is being studied) as the cause of the diverse rates of learning revealed by the experiments. 70 K. S. LASHLEY the problems presented to the animals so that a greater number may be trained. If the evidence given above can be verified by more extensive data this solution will doubtless prove to be the most satisfactory. TABLE 1 The average number of trials required by differentially treated groups before reaching the standards described in the text. The number of animals from which the averages were taken is given at the left and the relative rating of the groups by the two standards on the right. Trials Trials Number preceeding preceeding Rating Rating Group of "perfect 1st perfect by by animals learning" runs "P. L." 1st P. R. a 9 24.5 14.8 1 2 b 6 30.0 14.3 2 1 c 16 31.0 16.6 3 3 d 16 35.2 19.6 4 5 e 6 42.5 18.0 5 4 f 10 43.5 23.0 6 7 g 10 48.6 20.4 7 6 h 6 65.3 31.3 8 8 1 9 74.4 32.4 9 9 J 6 82.6 43.0 10 10 TABLE 2 Differences between groups c and d as measured by the two criteria of learning Group Trials preceding first errorless run Trials preceding three successive errorless runs Mean Probable error Coef. of Var. Mean Probable error Coef. of Var. d c 19.60 16.06 1.480 1.684 .448 .622 35.12 31.00 5.922 2.428 1.000 .464 Difference 3 .54±2.26 3 i 1.12±6.4C I THE REACTIONS OF DROSOPHILA AMPELOPHILA LOEW TO GRAVITY, CENTRIFUGATION, AND AIR CURRENTS WILLIAM H. COLE Contributions from the Zoological Laboratory of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College No. 288 INTRODUCTION Geotropism is characteristic of many animals and is often closely correlated with equilibration. The ear in vertebrates and the statocysts in invertebrates are evidently concerned with this reaction. In insects, however, there are no semi-circular canals or statocysts and it has not been proved that the so-called " static " organs (chordotonal, etc.) have to do with geotropism. Some other explanation is therefore to be sought. The experi- ments here described were carried out with the common fruit- fly, Drosophila ampelophila Loew, for the purpose of deter- mining (1) whether or not it is negatively geotropic; (2) how it responds to centrifugation and air currents; and (3) what mechan- ism can control these responses. Carpenter ('05) concluded that gravity acted on Drosophila as a ' directive ' stimulus only, some ' kinetic ' stimulation, such as photic or mechanical, being necessary to induce loco- motion. If this is true, how will Drosophila react to centrifugal force and air currents under conditions where light and mechan- ical stimuli are not effective ? This question was suggested by the fact that the flies, without mechanical stimulation, were found to respond negatively to gravity in the dark as well as in the light. If it should be found that Drosophila reacts nega- tively to centrifugation or to air currents, then it would seem that gravity is a kinetic stimulus as well as a directive one. Another question closely related with this one, which must be considered is, by what means is the stimulus of gravity received? 72 WILLIAM H. COLE The work was done under the direction of Professor G. H. Parker, to whom I wish to express my sincere thanks for guid- ance and suggestions throughout its progress. EXPERIMENTS 1. Effect of gravity in the dark. — The first experiments were carried out in a dark box modelled after the one described by Carpenter, except that no heat screen was used.1 The glass cylinder employed was 18 cm. long and 4 cm. in diameter, and was marked off by fine ink lines into six regions of equal length, to facilitate locating the flies at the end of the experiments. A small number of flies were put into the cylinder and attracted to the top end by a strong light. Quickly but carefully the cylinder was placed, this end down, inside the box. After a period of one minute the door was opened, the lights turned on and the position of the flies noted. Observations were also made with a single animal, with smaller and larger cylinders of celluloid as well as of glass, but since the results were always the same it is not necessary to describe these modifications in detail. The results of 58 trials involving 26 different animals showed that an average of 82 per cent went to the uppermost third of the cylinder after it was inverted, that 4.8 per cent remained in the lowest third and that the others stopped creeping in the middle third. The individual readings for those at the top varied from 67 to 92 per cent. In other words the animals re- acted negatively to the stimulus of gravity in the dark. Whether or not this response is due entirely to gravity without regard to the mechanical stimulus of turning them over will be con- sidered later. One of the sets of records in this series of experiments is given in Table I. 2. Effect of gravity on flies equally illuminated from above and below. — The dark box was converted into a light box by the intro- duction of two electric lights, one at each end. These were either carbon-filament lamps of 16 candle power or 15 -watt Mazda lamps. As before, the flies were attracted to the top of the cylinder, which was then inverted and placed in the light box. 1 Carpenter's heat screen, because of the thinness of the water layer, was prob- ably of no great value in preventing the action of the heat on the flies. THE REACTIONS OF DROSOPHILA 73 TABLE I Showing the position of 5 flies in 14 trials, after having been in the dark box one minute. At the beginning all the flies were in section 6. 85.71 per cent crept to the uppermost third of the cylinder (sections 1 and 2). Number of Flies in the Different Sections of Cylinder Trial number. 1 5 2 4 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Total Section 1 3 4 4 3 4 4 5 3 2 3 3 4 51 Section 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 9 Section 3 1 1 1 1 1 5 Section 4 1 1 1 1 1 5 Section 5 0 Section 6 0 After one minute the readings were taken. Eighty per cent of the flies used in 50 trials went to the top section, 9 per cent remained at the bottom and 11 per cent went to the middle. Here also the flies responded negatively to gravity. A set of records from this series is given in Table II. TABLE II Showing the position of 5 flies in 14 trials after having been one minute in the light box with equal illumination at top and bottom. 78.57 per cent crept to the uppermost third. Number of Flies in the Different Sections of Cylinder Trial number. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Total Section 1 3 5 5 2 3 5 3 3 2 4 1 3 2 1 42 Section 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 13 Section 3 1 1 2 4 Section 4 1 1 1 1 4 Section 5 1 1 1 3 1 7 Section 6 3. Effect of gravity on flies illuminated either from above or below. — In order to study the effect of unequal illumination, a 74 WILLIAM H. COLE single lamp was used either at the top or the bottom. When the top lamp was lighted 98.5 per cent of the flies went to the top after one minute, the others reaching the middle section. Twenty trials with 12 different animals were made. With illumination from below 70 trials on 21 flies resulted in 61 per cent going to the uppermost third and 22.5 per cent remaining in the lowest third. Thus when light acts contrary to gravity a smaller number of flies are found at the top. It is interesting to note that the light stimulus, contrary to expec- tation, did not predominate over gravity. An increase of the light intensity from 16 candle power to 40 made no difference in the results. A set of records from an experiment in which the light was below the cylinder and therefore acted contrary to gravity is given in Table III. TABLE III Showing the position of 5 flies in 14 trials after having been in the light box with a single lamp (15-watt Mazda) below the cylinder; 55.7 per cent crept to the upper- most third. Number of Flies in the Different Sections of Cylinder Trial number. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Total Section 1 2 2 3 2 1 2 1 3 2 4 2 2 2 1 29 Section 2 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 10 Section 3 1 1 2 1 1 6 Section 4 2 1 1 1 o Section 5 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 8 Section 6 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 12 These results corroborate previous work on this subject in so far as a negative response to gravity is concerned. But in this, as well as in all previous work, mechanical or light stimuli have been operating. The former cannot be eliminated in such experiments since it is impossible to invert the cylinder without moving it. Consequently I next tried a series of centrifuging experiments in which these two kinds of stimuli could be neg- lected. So far as I am aware the effect of centrifugal force on Drosophila has never before been studied. THE REACTIONS OF DROSOPHILA 75 4. Effect of centr if ligation. — The centrifuge consisted of a table mounted on a base capable of revolving, on a fixed axis in a horizontal plane. A small water motor attached to an ordinary faucet furnished the motive power. On the table could be fastened glass tubes of various lengths and bores. In these tubes, the ends of which were tightly corked, one or more flies were placed in the desired position; the tube was then revolved about its middle point as a center at a known speed, the time of revolution usually being one minute. In the preliminary trials it was found that at a certain speed the flies in the ends of the tube crept toward the center and remained there. If the speed was greatly increased, they were thrown out to the ends. It became necessary therefore to de- termine the maximum and minimum limits within which a definite response could be noted. The calculation was made according to the formula, F = where F represents the r centrifugal force, m the mass, v the velocity of revolution and r the radius. Experiments showed that when F was equivalent to gravity the flies began creeping toward the center. When it was considerably larger than gravity the flies were thrown out to the ends. Furthermore when F was just equivalent to gravity the flies crept toward the center until they reached a point where the force was less than gravity, the speed remaining the same. To induce further creeping toward the center the speed had to be increased, since the shorter the radius of revolution the greater the speed necessary to generate the same force. The tube ordinarily used was 50 cm. long with a diameter of 2 cm. Applying the formula, n = , which can be de- 47r2r rived from the previous one, the speed necessary to generate a force equivalent to gravity is easily calculated. When the flies are in the ends of the tube, therefore, it must revolve approx- imately once every second; as they move toward the center the speed must be gradually increased. But since the flies can creep against a force much greater than gravity without losing their equilibrium, a constant speed can be found at which they will creep all the way to the center. This is about 85 revolu- tions per minute. Experiments carried out in darkness, in dif- 76 WILLIAM H. COLE fuse daylight, and with a bright light at one side all gave similar results. A check experiment, in which the speed of revolution was very low (from 1 to 40), showed the flies creeping about indifferently; therefore it was concluded that mechanical and light stimuli did not affect the response in these experiments. One hundred trials with 40 different animals, under the various conditions described above, showed that a speed of 60 revolu- tions per minute was necessary to start them moving toward the center. As the flies approached the center the speed had to be gradually increased in order to keep them moving toward the center. At a distance of 2 cm. from the center a speed of approximately 210 revolutions per minute was necessary to ac- complish this. At a distance of 25 cm. from the center any speed greater than 100 revolutions per minute mechanically prevented the flies from creeping toward the center. Table IV gives the data for several trials taken at random from the series of 100. TABLE IV Showing the position of 14 flies in 8 trials after one minute of revolution at dif- ferent speeds. Number of flies Position at beginning Number revolutions per min. Time of revolution Position at end of experiment 2 End 50 1 min. End 2 End 72 1 min. \ way from end 1 End 90 1 min. Center 1 f way from end 120 1 min. End 2 I way from end 72 1 min. f way from end 2 \ way from end 96 1 min. Center 3 End 100 1 min. End 1 2 cm. from center 210 1 min. End These experiments demonstrate a very definite response and prove that Drosophila reacts negatively to a centrifugal force equal to or slightly greater than gravity, as well as to a gravi- tational one, without regard to other stimuli. We may there- fore consider gravity a kinetic stimulus as well as a directive one. THE REACTIONS OF DROSOPHILA 77 5. Effect of air currents. — The next question considered was, How does Drosophila respond to air currents? Horizontal, up- ward, and downward currents, produced by an electric fan, were directed into a glass cylinder like the one used in the dark box. Their strengths were so adjusted that the flies did not lose their equilibrium. (a) Horizontal currents. — These trials, carried out in diffuse daylight, did not give as definite a response as could be desired. The flies were liberated singly from the bottle containers at the open end of the cylinder, and their course of locomotion noted. In only 11 trials out of the 40 made, could the response be called definite. In 7 of these the flies crept against the current, in 2 they crept against it for about 10 cm. and then flew with it, and in the other 2 they flew with the current. Every case of creeping was against the current and every case of flying was with the current. In the control experiments with no air currents the flies crept or flew in any direction. (b) Upward vertical current. — In these trials 29.5 per cent of the flies crept upward with the current, 59 per cent flew upward, and 11.5 per cent crept downward. Gravity is here acting con- trary to the force of the current and the 29.5 per cent creeping up is probably a purely negative geotropic response. The creep- ing downward was very slow and intermittent. The largest number (59 per cent) flew with the current. (c) Downward vertical current. — The results of 61 trials showed that 27.8 per cent of the flies crept upward against the current, 23.2 per cent flew upward, while 49 per cent flew downward with the current. An interesting observation was that practically all the flies crept upward a short distance before carrying out the main response. In the control experiments, with no air current and the cylinder in a vertical position, the only reaction that could be noted was a negative geotropic one, the other movements being indifferent. There is therefore a tendency for Drosophila to fly with the air current, a positive response, and to creep against the current, a negative response. Since there were extremely few flying responses in the experiments with gravity and centrifugal force, no comparisons can be made with them. But the creeping against the currents corresponds with the negative response to gravity and centrif ligation. 78 WILLIAM H. COLE DISCUSSION The responses, other than mechanical ones, of animals to centrifugal force and air currents have not been thoroughly investigated. Only a few references to centrifuging experiments are found in the literature. Loeb ('91) stated that Cucumaria cucumis responds to centrifugation by contracting its body and remaining motionless. This condition persists for from one- quarter to one-half an hour afterward, when crawling is begun again. Although he studied the geotropic reactions of certain caterpillars, ephemerid larvae, coccinellids and blattids, no refer- ence is made to testing the effect of centrifugal force on them. Jensen ('93), having found that Paramoecium was negatively geotropic, discovered that it moved centripetally with weak cen- trifugation. Davenport and Perkins ('97), after concluding that ' gravity acts as an irritant to which the organism makes a response, belonging to the category of adaptive responses," say that this irritating pressure " may be replaced by a centrifugal pressure, when the same geotactic orientation will occur." Har- per ('11) also reported that Paramoecium reacted negatively with weak centrifugation. He believes, however, that " the response of Paramoecium to gravity is a purely mechanical tropism." On the other hand, geotropism of animals has been exten- sively studied, and many theories put forth for its explanation. It is generally accepted that the ear or some ' static " organ controls this tropism in certain forms. But for insects there is much doubt as to how the stimulus is received. Kafka ('14) reviews this question and summarizes the different theories, as follows: Loeb believes that the chordotonal organs at the base of the halteres of some Diptera are the organs of reception. Pfliigstaedt and Weinland describe other structures which might serve as sense organs. Similar organs have been described by Hochreuther for Dytiscus, by Janet for Hymenoptera, and by Baunacke for nepid larvae. But conclusive proof that any of these organs, the functions of which are little understood, control the response to gravity is entirely lacking. The reactions to the three kinds of forces described above suggest an explanation as to how the stimuli are received. When the fly is creeping upward against gravity the weight of the body is on the legs. There is, therefore, a tension on the leg THE REACTIONS OF DROSOPHILA 79 muscles distinct from that caused by creeping. When a fly is creeping against centrifugal force a similar tension of the leg muscles is produced. Furthermore, creeping against an air current causes the same kind of tension. Very probably, then, tl;e stimuli in all three cases are due to this tension and are received by the sensory nerves of the leg muscles, the response being an attempt to preserve the equilibrium of the body. Nega- tive geotropism in Drosophila, then, is concerned with the muscle sense. Radl ('05) expressed the view that the insect muscles are capable of acting as special sense organs when he wrote ' ' das Gehor der Insekten ist ein verfeinertes Muskelgefuhl." The flying response does not fit into this explanation and it may be that it is not influenced at all by gravity. It is a matter of common observation that the house flies on a brightly illu- minated window usually creep upward but fly in all directions. The flying is much more indefinite than the creeping. In my observations on geotropism only a very few cases of flying (about 3 per cent) were seen. Cylinders with a diameter as large as 12 cm. were used so as to allow flying, but no greater proportion of cases was seen than in the smaller cylinders. When disturbed the animals flew about indifferently for a short time and then, after alighting, continued their upward creeping. In the centrifuging experiments no flying at all was seen. The air currents often caused flying, and in the large percentage of cases the animals flew with the current, although they were able to withstand it. It seems therefore that the response to gravity is much less marked in flying than in creeping, where it is very definite. CONCLUSIONS 1. Drosophila ampelophila Loew, when creeping, reacts nega- tively to gravity, to a centrifugal force which is equal to or slightly greater than gravity, and to air currents without regard to other stimuli. Gravity is, then, a kinetic as well as a direc- tive stimulus. 2. The stimuli causing these reactions are probably received by the sensory nerves of the leg muscles. 3. It is probable that flying reactions of Drosophila are not influenced by gravity. 80 WILLIAM H. COLE REFERENCES Carpenter, F. W. The Reactions of the Pomace Fly (Drosophila ampelophila 1905. ' Loew) to Light, Gravity and Mechanical Stimulation. Amer. Nat. vol. 39, pp. 156-171. Davenport, C. B., and Perkins, H. A Contribution to the Study of Geotaxis in 1897. the Higher Animals. Jour. Physiol., vol. 22, pp. 99-100. Harper, E. H. The Geotropism of Paramoecium. Jour. Morph., vol. 22, pp. 1911. 993-1000. Jensen, P. Ueber den Geotropismus niederer Organismen. Arch. ges. Physiol., 1893. Bd. 53, pp. 428-480. Kafka, G. Einfiihrung in die Tierpsychologie auf experimenteller und etholo- 1914. gischer Grundlage. Leipzig, 8vo., xii+593 pp. Loeb, J. Ueber Geotropismus bei Thieren. Arch. ges. Physiol, Bd. 49, pp. 175- 1891. 189. Radl, E. Ueber das Gehor der Insekten. Biol. Cenlralbl., Bd. 25, pp. 1-5. 1905. GEOTROPISM IN PLANARIA MACULATA J. M. D. OLMSTED Contributions from the Zoological Laboratory of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College No. 289 Flat-worms, such as planarians, are commonly collected from the underside of stones in a stream or pond (Bardeen, '01 ; Pearl, '03; Whitehouse, '14). The resting position of these animals, with their ventral surfaces uppermost, would seem to indicate a negative response to gravity, since when moving they may be in any position, depending upon the particular surface over which they happen to be gliding. This investigation has as its object the analysis of the resting behavior of these worms. The specimens used were Planaria maculata Leidy and were taken from Fresh Pond, Cambridge, Mass. A stock was brought into the laboratory and kept in a large jar on a table about four feet from a north window. To ascertain the relative importance of light and gravity in the reactions to be studied, an experiment in the following form was carried out. One-half of one surface of a glass plate, 10 x 8 cm., was coated with black wax. This plate was supported in a horizontal position by wax feet 4 mm. high on a second glass plate. The pair were placed in a flat dish and covered with water to the depth of 3 cm. The flat dish had a collar of black paper about its sides, so that only light from above could fall on the plates. Then twenty planarians were placed at one time on the upper plate, at another on the lower one, and their positions recorded twice a day. As the animals moved about over the whole dish for an hour or more after beginning the experiment, the fact that they had started from the upper or lower plate was not significant. The results of 30 readings showed that 30 per cent were not under the plates, but usually in the shadow near the angle between the bottom and side of the dish, 70 per cent being 82 J. M. D. OLMSTED found between the plates, and always under the black half. Of the latter, one-fifth were on the under side of the upper plate (ventral surface up), and four-fifths on the lower plate (dorsal surface up). Since, as the preceding experiment showed, the influence of light was so marked, it was decided to eliminate this factor by conducting all the subsequent experiments in a light-proof box. To eliminate thigmotropism and to provide a contin- uous surface which should have all possible relations to gravity, spherical balloon flasks were used. These flasks were 13 cm. in diameter. They had a short neck 4 cm. long. Three regions of equal area were marked off on the surface of each flask, a ring about its equator and a segment at either pole. These three regions were designated top, middle, and bottom. The flasks were so marked that in one the neck came in the top, in another in the middle, etc. In the experiments very few worms lodged in the neck and the per cent of such was practically the same whether it occurred in flasks with the neck in the top area, in the middle, or in the bottom. In the tabulation of results worms in the neck are not included. Twenty worms were used in each experiment. Readings of their positions were made at 9 A. M., 1. P. M. and 4. 30 P. M. In a few cases readings were taken at intervals of two hours, but even then the animals were at rest. They were made to start moving before being returned to the box, as a means of redistributing them for the beginning of another trial. It was found that the positions of the planarians in the flasks changed greatly during the first few days after being put into the dark. At first the majority were to be found in the bottom of the flasks. A few days later they were equally distributed in the three areas. When they were fed there was a sudden depar- ture from this equal distribution and the majority would be found in the top. They again distributed themselves equally in the three areas three or four days after feeding. Table I gives a summary of results. The numbers are the per cents taken from 10 or more readings. By ' from light ' is meant worms taken from the stock which had been kept in the light. " From dark ' means worms which had been in the dark-box for a week or longer. ' Fed ' worms are those which were fed on liver on the day of the experiment or every other day GEOTROPISM IN PLANARIA MACULATA 83 during experimentation. ' Unfed ' are those which had been without food for five days or more. From these results it is evident that two factors are con- cerned in the distribution of the worms: First, previous history as regards exposure to light, and second, the state of metabolism of the worms in relation to feeding. Both fed and unfed worms which had previously been in the light were found to be mostly positively geotropic immediately after being put in the dark. The fed ones then became negative for a short time. Finally both became indifferent if feeding was stopped. Those which had been in the dark for a long time were negative when fed and indifferent when unfed. Walter ('08) makes the statement that Planaria gonocephala " seems, after several hours of ex- posure to the dark, to be positively geotropic," while Kafka ('14, p. 151) says that Planaria gonocephala is negatively geo- tropic after long retention in the dark. Both of these appar- ently contradictory statements are probably true, since the length of exposure to the dark may very well be an important factor in the geotropism of Planaria gonocephala, as my experiments show for its close relative, P. maculata. That this negative geotropism of fed worms in the dark is not in reality a response to oxygen from the open neck is shown by the following experiment. A flask containing 20 planarians was completely filled with water, and the mouth covered by a glass plate. It was then immersed neck downwards in a jar of water in the dark-box. Previous to the experiment the planarians had been fed every other day for two weeks, and were dividing so that at the end of the experiment there were 27 worms instead of 20. The per cents found in the three areas of the flask under these conditions were as follows: Top, 58; middle, 33; and bottom, 9. These are of the same order as the last two series of the per cents given in Table I. Table II shows this relationship. 84 J. M. D. OLMSTED TABLE I Area of the Flask Month Top Middle Bottom Unfed 1st 2 days in box. . . 19 10 71 Nov. 1st 2 days in box . . . 17 21 62 Jan. From light 5+davs in box 38 24 38 Nov.-Jan. Fed before expt. 1st 2 days in box . . . 16 21 63 Nov. 3rd, 4th days in box. 63 21 16 Nov. 5th day onward. . . 36 23 41 Nov. Unfed 36 30 34 Nov. 38 35 27 Dec. 35 36 29 Jan. From dark Fed contin- uously 58 28 14 Dec. 68 26 6 Jan. TABLE II Area of Flask Month Top Middle Bottom Flask open to air 58 28 14 Dec. From dark and fed 68 26 6 Jan. Flask submerged in water . . . 58 33 9 Jan. Table II shows that the per cents were the same whether the flasks were open to the air or entirely submerged in water. If the worms had been responding to oxygen and not to gravity, we should expect in this experiment to have found them in the bottom near the mouth, where oxygenated water could enter from the jar outside. They were actually found in the region GEOTROPISM IN PLANARIA MACULATA 85 farthest from the supply of oxygen, so that their position was a true response to gravity. To find whether the presence of the slime tracks influenced this behavior, indifferent animals were kept for a week (1) with no change of water, but the slime washed out from the flask daily, (2) with change of water daily, but the slime not washed out, and (3) with no change of water and no cleansing of the flask. Table III gives a summary of results. TABLE III Area of Flask Top Middle Bottom Slime washed out dailv 44 30 26 Unfed and from dark Water changed daily 29 31 40 No washing or change of water 35 26 29 Since the planarians remained practically as indifferent to gravity throughout the experiment as they were before it was begun, the presence or absence of slime tracks probably had little effect on their geotropism. The results of these experiments are in line with observations on the stock animals. They usually remain in the shadow under the stones and along the side of the dish. The majority rest on the underside of the stones, but a great many are to be found on the sides of the dish. Immediately after they finish feeding, they glide to the top and move about over the dish. If the water is changed at this time they soon come to rest near the bottom again. If the water is allowed to get foul after feeding, they remain at the top, probably in this case on account of lack of oxygen below. I have been unable to see daily migration such as Walter ('08) observed. It would seem reasonable, therefore, to suppose that the collector who finds planarians ventral surface up on the underside of rocks, sees those which have been feeding, while if he looked in other places he might find the unfed ones in any position. 86 J. M. D. OLMSTED Since Planaria maculata has no otocyst, it may be that after eating, the food in the digestive tract serves as an otolith, and after digestion and assimilation the animal becomes indifferent to gravity because the food is no longer able to press upon the digestive epithelium. This does not account for the fact that fed worms are positively geotropic when first put in the dark. I wish to thank Dr. Parker for suggesting the problem and for advice as to methods. CONCLUSIONS 1. Unfed Planaria maculata which have been in the light are positively geotropic when first placed in the dark. After several days in the dark they become indifferent to gravity. 2. Fed Planaria maculata which have been kept in the light are likewise positively geotropic at first. But they become nega- tive after two days and indifferent after five days. 3. Fed planarians which have been in the dark for some time are negatively geotropic. 4. The presence or absence of slime tracks has no influence on the geotropism of these planarians. REFERENCES Bardeen, C. R. On the Physiology of the Planaria maculata with Especial Refer- 1901. ence to the Phenomena of Regeneration. Amer. Jour. Physiol., vol. 5, pp. 1-55. Kafka, G. Einfiihrung in die Tierpsychologie auf experimenteller und etholo- 1914. gischer Grundlage. Leipzig, 8vo., xii+593 pp. Pearl, R. The Movements and Reactions of Fresh-water Planarians: A Study 1902. of Animal Behavior. Quart. Jour. Micr. Sci., vol. 46, pp. 508-714. Walter, H. E. The Reactions of Planarians to Light. Jour. Exp. Zool., vol. 5, 1908. pp. 35-162. Whitehouse, R. H. The Natural History of Planarians. Irish Naturalist, vol. 1914. 23, pp. 41-47. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOR Vol. 7 MARCH-APRIL No. 2 THE DELAYED REACTION WITH SOUND AND LIGHT IN CATS JOSEPH U. YARBROUGH From the Psychological Laboratory of the University oj Texas The experiments herein reported on the delayed reaction in cats were carried out during the session 1915-16 in the Psycho- logical Laboratory of the University of Texas under the direc- tion of Prof. W. S. Hunter. The purpose of the work was: first, to determine the limits of the period of delay; second, to ascertain definitely the behavior during delay; and third, to describe as nearly as possible the method of reaction which leads to success. Careful records were kept of the behavior during the period of delay, and particularly of the bodily atti- tudes maintained and of the orientations. Associations were set up between movements that led to food and a light or buzzer, as the case might be, which could be in either of three boxes. With this association well established, tests were instituted in which the stimulus was cut off before the reaction was com- pleted. And throughout the remaining experiments the subject had to respond in the absence of the stimulus that until now had been present at the moment of response. It was my purpose to use in this problem a method of pro- cedure sufficiently similar to those already used with other animals,— raccoons, rats, dogs, and children — that by comparison the relative ranking of the cat in the solution of the problem could be ascertained. 88 JOSEPH U. YARBROUGH i II 1. Cats tested on light. — The four cats used in these tests were Jim $ , Tom J* , Fay 9 . and Bobby $ . Jim and Bobby were both about ten months old, vigorous, healthy animals, and their records may be accepted as typical. The other two were young cats that had not been properly cared for. They were weak and died before they were well into the experiments. 2. Cats tested on sound. — Four cats were used in the tests on sound. Bess 9 and Phil cf were each about two years old. Judy 9 was about one year and Kitty 9 at least two years old. Bess and Phil continued strong and did excellent work throughout the experiments. Judy and Kitty, on the other hand, died early in the work. From this it is seen that four cats were at work practically all the time, — two on the light tests and two on the sound tests. One would think from the number of deaths reported that the cats were in poor physical condition. Such, however, was not the case. Their general health was very good. Those that died did not experience a long period of sickness, but died within thirty-six hours of the appearance of distress. There was only one exception to this, and in this case the cat was replaced by another rather than risk her recovery. It was much more difficult than 1 had expected for them to become physically adjusted to their new environment. They were kept in a wire cage 12' by 3|' by 6' high, in a room adja- cent to the experiment room. Their room was well ventilated, and a large east window provided an inlet to the morning sun- shine. The difficult thing was to find the most nourishing food for them. Milk, with a small amount of raw steak, proved to be the most satisfactory. Ill DESCRIPTION OF APPARATUS AND METHODS In Fig. 1 is shown the ground plan of the box used. The box was made of \" boards and was 26" high, with the doors at a, b, c, 10" high by 7" wide. The distance between these doors was respectively 20", and the distance from the release door E to each of the doors was 44". The door E of the release box was raised by a cord passed over a pulley directly above it and 6|' above the floor of the apparatus. Besides this pulley THE DELAYED REACTION IN CATS 89 were three other pulleys through which passed cords from the three sliding doors marked D in the figure. With the aid of these cords, the experimenter could stand behind the release box and control the door at each of the boxes. The release box was covered with wire of \" mesh, and the board B upon which was fastened the switches for both light and sound. The light stimulus came from 8 c.p. lamps, so wired that any one of them could be cut in at a time. The current was obtained from a 110 volt switchboard B. B h 's i Figure 1. — Ground plan of apparatus In order that the cat might not come in contact with the lamps, and, also, not be hindered in entering the boxes, a hole was bored in the back wall of each of the boxes and a lamp placed outside and behind each box. The holes were of the same size and 5" from the floor. The lamps were mounted on bases which rested on the floor, and were placed behind the holes so that they had equal intensities and could be observed with equal ease from the release box. One 8 c.p. lamp hung over the center of the apparatus and 4' from the floor throughout the experiment. This light was shaded with a paper bag which made it necessary to keep fresh sawdust on the floor of the box to make the movements of the animals clearly visible. At the 90 JOSEPH U. YARBROUGH outset I was compelled to cover the entire apparatus, as the cats were free to jump out at will. The wire used for this pur- pose was of \" mesh and its tendency to blurr the field of vision made it still more necessary that the white sawdust be used. Fig. 2 should give a clear presentation of the essentials of the box when taken in connection with Fig. 1. Figure 2 The cats on sound used the same apparatus as those on light, the only difference being the change in stimulus. On the switch- board B, Fig. 1, were placed three buttons which corresponded to each of the three light boxes, a, b, and c. In each of these boxes a buzzer was suspended directly over the door and 12" from the floor of the apparatus. These buzzers were suspended by a coiled wire, and were not in contact with the apparatus. The system of wiring was the same as that of lighting — i.e., any buzzer could be sounded at the wish of the experimenter by pushing the proper button on the switchboard B. Such an arrangement made it possible for the experiments on both sound and light to be carried on without any interference. So far as the knowledge of the experimenter goes, the cats on light never found the buzzers, nor did the cats on sound find the lamps. The general method of experimentation was as follows: The animal to be tested was put in the release box which is THE DELAYED REACTION IN CATS 91 shown in Fig. 1. Now, suppose, for example, that the lighted box were the one on the left, c; its exit door would be opened and its light turned on. When the experimenter was sure that the cat had seen the light or heard the sound, the animal was released. A careful, detailed record was kept of the direction in which the animal was oriented at the moment of release and its path to the exit. Any unusually wide turn in the path was always recorded. Hesitation and zig-zag move- ments were especially noted whenever and wherever they ap- peared in the cat's response. In these experiments the cats should go straight to the lighted box, and through its exit door and back to the entrance of the release box where they got food. With the cats on the sound problem, the reactions were the same. With them, however, the " lighted " box was a " sound ' box. When the cats were sufficiently trained to choose the stimulus box (lighted or sounded, as the case may be) almost perfectly, delays were begun. The periods of delay were much the same as those used by Hunter.1 The first delay was to turn the stimulus off just as the animal reached the box. In the second delay, the stimulus was cut off when the animal was half way to the box. In the third delay, the stimulus was stopped just as the animal made its first move in response after the door of the release box was raised. And, in the fourth delay, the stim- ulus was cut off just before the door of the release box was raised. In this fourth stage a genuine delay first enters in. The first three stages of delay were of little or no value as delays. Their primary purpose wras to bridge over the period of stim- ulus to non-stimulus, to bridge that period between acting in the presence of a stimulus and acting in the absence of a stimu- lus. All that was necessary to make a correct response was, in each case, for the cat to continue in the direction he was going. There was no further choice to be made. The fourth delay, however, was genuine, although of small duration. The stimulus, was cut off before the cats were released. Throughout the re- mainder of the experiments the cats were compelled to react in the absence of the stimulus that until now had been present at the moment of response. There was no definite standard adopted by which to promote 1 Hunter, Walter S. The delayed reaction in animals and children. Behav. Mon., vol. 2, no. 1, 1913. 92 JOSEPH U. YARBROUGH from one period of delay to another. The general method used, however, was to promote the animal as fast as possible, and only demote when the records showed him unable to bridge the delay. There were no special arrangements made for punishment in case of error. It was easy to observe, however, that there was a certain degree of punishment following each error. These pun- ishments were: having to back out of a box, and having food and freedom deferred for a longer period of time. Although the cats were expected to go straight to the stimulus box, no wide turn in their pathway is recorded wrong unless they approached the entrance to one of the other boxes. The apparatus was so constructed that the animal could not see the position of an exit door, i.e., whether it was open or closed, without actually approaching the particular box. IV EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 1. Three Compartment Experiments A. Learning the association. — Although the primary purpose of this investigation is a study of the delayed reaction proper, it is well to make additional note of the learning process. Table I gives the number of trials required by the cats of set A to learn the association between the light and the getting of food. Each cat was given 10 trials daily. Fay, the last reported in the table, died at the end of 50 trials. Her results are reported, however, because 75% of her last 20 trials were successful. TABLE I Cats Tested on Light Number Per cent Number Number Per cent correct of correct of Cat of trials correct correct last 50 last 50 Bobby 130 96 73 47 94 Jim 110 84 76 49 99 Tom 170 112 65 45 90 Fay 50 25 50 25 50 The number of trials required by the cats on sound, set B, are given in table II. The last cat reported in this table died at the end of 40 trials. For this reason no record of her work appears in the last two columns of the table. THE DELAYED REACTION IN CATS 93 TABLE II Cats Tested on Sound Number Per cent Number Number Per cent correct of correct of Cat of trials correct correct last 50 last 50 Bess 180 123 68 43 86 Phil 70 44 63 37 74 Kitty 110 68 61 32 64 Judy 40 26 65 These results indicate, first, that the cats of each set learned the association readily. The learning curve would appear short and steep. And, second, they indicate that it is more difficult to maintain a high efficiency in set B than in set A. This is indicated by the fact that, while Bess and Phil, both of set B, made 86% and 74% respectively correct in the last 50 trials, Bobby and J m, of set A, made 94% and 99%. Although the differences of results, as given in the tables above, are not conclusive, the experimenter is of the opinion that the sound tests present the more difficult problem. These variations may well be explained on the basis of individual differences, but it is to be noted that the animals tested on light have the better records. This probable increase in difficulty in the sound tests is due, no doubt, to the timidity on the part of the cats when approaching the sound. The records show, as is indicated in the next paragraph, that the cats were for some time rather frightened by the sound of the buzzers. This caused an increase in the number of errors and so a decrease in the percentage of correct reactions. Before a definite conclusion can be reached a sufficient number of cats, to eliminate errors from individual variations, must be tested. Observations of the behavior of the animals during the learn- ing period on sound, which were recorded from day to day, suggest several smaller divisions. (1) A period of disregard. My notes read, " Bess appears to give no attention to the buz- zer," and, again, the next day, " Bess walks about freely with- out noticing the buzzer." (2) A period of disturbance. This period may be characterized by a behavior whic i may be termed " awareness " or " worry." The cat stops, turns head, looks, and calls as if in danger. This note is recorded, " Bess dislikes to go to the sound. She appears shy and afraid of the buzzer. She will venture to the door, stop, and squat; look up at the buz- 94 JOSEPH U. YARBROUGH zer and sometimes rise up and ' sniff ' at it before going into the box." (3) A period of hesitation. The behavior of this period is characterized by wavering and by starts and stops. And, in period (4), the cat gives strict attention to the stimuli. Here the behavior becomes more nearly perfect, the path of reaction has been made straight, and the percentage of correct reaction is high. With the animals tested on light, set A, the same learning period divisions could be made. In this case, however, the period of disturbance was not accompanied by so much timidity and fear. During this period of experimentation all possible care was taken to prevent any preference for particular boxes. Should such a tendency be observed, control tests were given to break it up before the position habit was well developed. At the end of the first 60 trials each box had been presented 20 times, and the records show that no box was chosen more than 26, nor less than 16 times by any one of the eight subjects. For comparison we bring together in table III data on learn- ing the association obtained by Hunter in his "study of animals and place beside it that of our own subjects. It is of interest to note that all the cats fall in the class with Bob, Hunter's most rapid raccoon. Bob learned the association in 120 trials while the eight cats used in these tests ranged from 50 to 180 trials with an average of 107 trials each. The curve representing the learning period for the discrimination of the three compartments was very short and steep, yet broken and irregular. With continued practice, this irregularity would un- doubtedly have been eliminated; and the cats of each set would have attained perfect mastery of their problem. TABLE III Number of Number of trials on trials on learning learning Raccoons — Rat Bob 120 No. 9 280 Betty 340 No. 12 440 Jack 540 No. 13 250 Jill 825 No. 15 No. 16 220 480 Dogs — Blackie 560 Brownie 650 THE DELAYED REACTION IN CATS 95 TABLE III— Continued Rats- No. 2. No. 4. No. 5. No. 6. No. 7. Number of trials on learning 176 175 505 800 361 Cats- Bobby. Jim . . . Tom. . Fay . . . Bess . . . Phil . . . Kitty . . Number of trials on learning 130 110 170 50 180 70 110 (c) Controls used. — In the construction of the apparatus, every effort was made to eliminate all possible differences in the com- partments which could be used as guides to correct reactions. The backgrounds surrounding the entrances to the compart- ments were all alike painted black. Since the backgrounds were all of the same brightness, and, since everything remained con- stant with the single exception of the exit doors to the com- partments, controls were put in to determine their possible effect. In order to test this, the three doors were all opened and the tests were given by the usual method under conditions in all other respects normal. The results were entirely negative. In no case did an animal make use of the doors as cues to its reactions. Again, control tests were introduced to determine whether or not the animals were really depending upon the applied stimuli (light or sound) for cues for guiding their reactions. To test this, experiments were made under normal conditions except that each time the stimulus (sound or light) was withheld .30% correct reactions was the highest made by any subject under these conditions. It is clear, therefore, that normally the reac- tions were made either to sound or to light. Not being able to secure the same pitch and intensity in each of the three buzzers, control tests were made to determine whether the animals had formed associations between them on the basis of quality. The buzzers were all interchanged — buzzer a took the place of b, b the place of c, and c the place of a. No case was found where the differences in pitc'i and intensity were used as cues for reaction. These qualitative differences could well have been effective during the period of learning the association ; but, on the delayed experiments, they could be of little or no value. The essential cues in handling delays must be factors 96 JOSEPH U. YARBROUGH that are variable from trial to trial otherwise they cannot be selective in nature. No temperature controls were used. They were thought to be unnecessary because of the following: 1. The lights were turned on but for a short time. 2. They were outside of the main apparatus. 3. The cats oriented immediately when the lights were turned on and reacted precipitately when released. And, 4, the behavior of the cats on light was the same as that of those on sound where temperature could not be involved. B. "Delayed" experiments. — Since in the first four delays used the entire reaction was not performed after the stimulus had been removed, it is probable that they should not be termed delays at all. The stimulus was always continued until the experi- menter was convinced from all external evidence that the cat had become aware of its presence. The cats tested on sound and those on light were all pre- sented their problems by the method described above, but for convenience the data will be discussed separately. (a) Set A (cats tested on light). — Delay I. — In delay I the light was turned off just as the cat reached the correct compartment. Bobby was given 30, Jim, 20 trials; and for both of them each trial was successful. With the association well established, the turning off of the stimulus at this point in the reaction effects no change in their percentage of correct response. Delay II. — In this delay the stimulus was cut off when the cat was half way from the release box to the correct compart- ment.2 Jim was given 10 trials with all of them correct. Bobby was given 60 trials with 56 correct. There appears to be no difficulty in making the step from delay I to delay II, even though the cats here made one-half of the distance of response in the absence of the stimulus. After the cat is well set out, then, on his reaction, the stimulus may be withdrawn without affect- ing the response. Delay III. — The only difference in this delay and number II is that here the stimulus is withdrawn before the cat is well on 2 In case the cat started from the release box in a different direction from that of the stimulus, e.g., if he started toward c when the stimulus was at a, the stimulus was not turned off until he did turn in the direction of the stimulus compartment, and so in this case, was well on his way. THE DELAYED REACTION IN CATS 97 his way, while in II the reaction was half completed. Jim was given 20 trials all of which were correct. Bobby was given 60 trials with 57 correct. The reader will notice that the cats have still met no difficulty. Delay IV. — Bobby was given 80 trials of which 66, or 82%, were correct. Jim received 130 trials, 107 of which were cor- rect, making also 82%. Here the first difficulty of bridging over a period of delay appears. The door of the release box and the cutting off of the stimulus were operated simultaneously and without reference to where the cat was or what it was doing. Thus the animal was forced to initiate the reaction and perhaps make a choice of compartments, in the absence of the stimulus. The data show that Jim took much longer to master this delay than did Bobby, although he had held a higher percentage on fewer trials in the three preceding delays. The fact that Jim had received 100 trials less than Bobby in these preceding delays can be offered as explanation of his need of 60 more trials here. It seems natural that had he not been advanced so rapidly from one delay to another he would have been better prepared for this new delay, and, being better prepared, would have bridged over it much more quickly. Two seconds delay. — At this point in the experiments a metro- nome was placed in an adjacent room to mark the period of delay in seconds. At this distance its sounds could be easily heard by the experimenter, yet they were not thought to be strong enough to distract the attention of the animals. Bobby was given 130 trials with 106, or 81% correct; while Jim was given 200 trials, 143, or 71% of which were correct. Of the last 40% of Bobbie's trials, 34, or 85% were correct; of the last 40% of Jim's trials, 32, or 80% were correct. The data do not show that the reactions were poor at the beginning of the delay and grew better with successive trials, but rather show an irregularity throughout. Bobby, e.g., was perfect on the first 10 trials, while after having received 70 trials she made only 50% on 10 trials. Again, Jim, after 160 trials, made only 30% on 10 trials, yet on the 10 just preceding, he made 90% and 80% on the 10 immediately following. Four seconds delay. — In the four seconds delay experiment, 180 trials were given Bobby with 141 correct, and 150 given Jim with 118 correct. Each made 78% correct. Jim's last 30 98 JOSEPH U. YARBROUGH trials showed much improvement, 29 of them being correct reactions. Although Bobby had 30 more trials on this delay than Jim, she made only 26 out of her last 30 trials. This is readily explained in the light of the fact that the middle com- partment was dropped out during this period with Jim, while Bobby continued on three compartments. Jim had made 70% on the last 40 trials preceding the 30 trials mentioned above, of which he got 29 correct. At the end of these 40 trials, the middle compartment was dropped out. Of the first 10 trials with only two compartments, Jim made 100% correct. The records show that Jim would have made a higher percentage than 70 much sooner had it not been for a tendency to drop out the middle box. This is not only seen in table IV, but by the fact that when he received the stimulus only from boxes "a" and "c" (the experimenter having dropped out the middle box), he made 100% on the first 10 trials. TABLE IV Daily Record on 4 Seconds Delay with Light Number Number Distribution of errors Cat of trials correct a b c 10 6 1 2 1 10 9 0 1 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 7 2 0 1 10 7 2 0 1 10 8 0 2 0 10 8 0 2 0 10 7 1 1 1 10 8 0 2 0 10 8 0 1 1 10 8 0 2 0 10 7 2 0 10 7 1 1 10 8 0 2 0 10 8 1 0 10 9 0 0 . 10 9 0 0 1 10 9 0 0 11 19 7 10 9 0 1 0 10 8 0 2 0 10 7 0 2 1 10 6 0 3 1 10 7 0 3 0 10 7 0 2 1 10 8 0 2 0 THE DELAYED REACTION IN CATS 99 * TABLE IN— Continued Cat Jim. Number Number Distribution of errors of trials correct a b c 10 9 0 1 0 10 7 0 3 0 10 7 0 3 0 10 7 0 3 0 10 *7 0 3 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 9 1 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 1 28 3 Six seconds delay. — Bobby was the only cat either on light or sound that was tested on the six seconds delay before the middle box was taken out. Although she had made 85% on her last 40 trials on the four seconds delay, she fell to 50% on the first 10 trials in the six seconds delay. After 90 trials with only 50% of the last 40 correct, she was put back on the four seconds delay where she was given 70 trials, making 80% on the last 50. She was again given 20 trials on the six seconds delay with 55% correct. After 60 more trials on the four seconds delay with 85% correct, she was given 20 trials on the six seconds delay with 70% correct. The records show that during the six seconds delay she became restless and often turned around in the release box. In such cases she usually went to boxes a or c, depending upon the one she came in line with first in making a circle by her turning in the release box. It is the writer's opinion that with further training cats can bridge the six seconds delay with three boxes. (b) Set B (cats tested on sound). — Delay I. — The two cats that continued the work on sound after the death of their fellows were Bess and Phil. Bess was given 60 trials, 48 of which were correct. Of the last 30 trials, 26 or 86% were correct. Phil received 30 trials with 25 or 83% correct, and 9 of the last 10 correct. As in the case of the light experiments, no difficulty was encountered by cutting off the stimulus at this point in the reaction. Delay II. — One hundred trials were given Bess, and she made 80% correct reactions. Phil received 50 trials which contained 90% correct. Of the last 20 trials 19 were correct. Although * Middle box was dropped out here. 100 JOSEPH U. YARBROUGH the cats were making the last half of the response in the absence of the stimulus, no difficulty yet appeared. Delay III. — On this type of delay, where the stimulus was cut off the moment the cat left the release box, Bess was given 100 trials. Of this number 84 were correct, with 54 of the last CO correct. Phil made 56 correct reactions out of 70 trials, making a percentage of 80. These results mean that, having started correctly, the cats are able to retain their cue for cor- rect reaction even though the remainder of the reaction must be made in the absence of the stimulus. Delay IV. — In this delay, Bess was given 60 trials, 55 of which were correct, and, of the last 40 trials, 39 were correct. Phil was given 60 trials with only 60% correct. Of the last 30 pre- sentations, 18 were reacted to correctly. Table V shows Phil's tendency to drop out compartment b whenever the delays set in. TABLE V Daily Record on Delay 4 With Sound Number Number Distribution of errors Cat of trials correct a b c Bess 10 10 6 0 2 0 2 0 10 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 9 0 1 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 3 3 0 Phil 10 7 0 2 1 10 7 0 3 0 10 6 1 2 1 10 4 0 4 2 10 7 0 2 1 10 7 0 3 0 *10 8 0 2 0 10 9 0 1 0 10 8 1 1 0 10 7 0 3 0 2 22 5 Two seconds delay. — On this two seconds delay, Bess was given 130 trials and of this number 116 or 89% were correct. Of the last 80 trials, 74 were correct; with the percentage of 92, she was promoted to the four seconds delay. Phil was given * From January 23rd to February 3rd, Phil was being retrained on delays II and III, receiving 10 trials each day. THE DELAYED REACTION IN CATS 101 60 trials with 51 or 85% correct. Of his last 40 trials, 35 were correct. Four seconds delay. — One hundred and seventy trials were given Bess with 121 correct responses. Of the last 30, only 18 were correct. With this low record, it was thought best to return to shorter delays before trying to advance. From January 24th, 1916, until February 14th, she was given 10 trials daily on delay IV and on two seconds delays. Of the 200 trials given during this period 120 were given on the two seconds delay, the last 30 of which netted 28 correct reactions. This high percentage of correct reaction on the last 30 is due to the dropping out of the middle box ; so, also, may the low percentage of correct reaction immediately preceding be explained by the tendency to drop out the middle boxes the delays were length- ened. The percentage of correct responses in the last 30 trials immediately preceding the dropping out of the middle box was 66, while the percentage of the first 30 after its being dropped out was 94. (c) Maximal interval of delay with three boxes. — In table VI the maximal delays attained by my cats are given, and for comparative purposes similar data on Hunter's animals and Walton's dogs are included. The reader should remember that these tests were made with a choice of three boxes and that training stopped here because of a well developed tendency to drop out the middle box. In the case of Phil, the last cat reported in the table, this tendency was not well devel- oped. As is shown in the table, he was making a good record on the two seconds delay, and there are no indications that he could not have bridged a longer period of delay with three boxes. TABLE VI Maximal Number Per cent Animal delay of trials correct , ..Rats- No. 13 4 sees. . . . 88 No. 15 1 sec. 86 No. 16 1 sec. 50 No. 17 7 sees. 68 Dogs — Blackie 5 mins. 80 Brownie 2 sees. 68 102 JOSEPH U. YARBROUGH TABLE VI — Continued Maximal Number Per cent Animal delay of trials correct Raccoons — ■ Jill 3 sees. . . . 93 Jack 20 sees. ... 85 Bob 25 sees. ... 90 Walton Dogs 10 sees. ... 64 Present work . . Cats — Set A (light) Bobbv 4 sees. 160 85 Jim... 4 sees. 120 78 Set B (sound) Bess . 4 sees. 170 71 Phil . 2 sees. 40 83 It will be noted that the longest delay mastered by the cats was a period of four seconds. I am sure that with continued training they can bridge a much longer period than this. But, since I was more interested in the behavior during delay than in the maximum period of delay; and since at this point there had developed a tendency to drop out the middle box; and, again, since time was limited, I thought it best not to give further training on three boxes. (d) Longer delays. — ■ Scattered throughout the experiments are correct reactions over periods of delay much longer than those mastered in the regular series. These periods were willingly lengthened by the subjects themselves. This in itself is good evidence that with sufficient training a much longer interval of delay could be mastered. At three different times Bess made 9 correct reac- tions out of 10 trials with a delay period of six seconds. And, at another time she made, with the same interval of delay, 17 correct responses out of 20 trials. Twice she responded cor- rectly after a delay period of twenty-six seconds. It will be recalled that Bess was tested on sound. Jim, also tested on sound, bridged at one time a period of eight seconds, at another a period of eighteen seconds, and a third of thirty-four seconds. The cats on light seemed not to have hesitated so often as did those on sound. In all the work on the three box experiments, Bobby was the only cat tested on light who voluntarily length- ened her period of delay. On this occasion she sat for sixty-six seconds in the release box, after which she went directly to the proper compartment. All the periods of hesitation were not measured and tabulated. Animals, both of Set A and Set B, THE DELAYED REACTION IN CATS 103 hesitated often from one to three seconds on a single reaction, but their occurrence was so irregular and their duration so brief that their measurement and tabulation were very difficult. Therefore, no period was recorded in seconds unless it was of considerable duration. However, all hesitations were entered in the notes. 2. Two Compartment Experiments A. "Delayed" experiments. — The delay work was continued in the two compartment tests by the usual method. The series of presentations of boxes was changed from ab cc ba ba cb bb ca ca be ca ba ca bb ca ac One of these three series of ten had been used each night. Each one was used an equal number of times and at no time was "one given twice in succession. In this way no one series was given twice within three days. On the two compartment tests the number of series was increased to four, as follows: ac ca ac ca ca ca ac ca ca ac aa ca ca ac ac cc aa ca ac ca These were taken in their order beginning with the first, and no one was, therefore, given twice within four days. (a) Cats tested on light. — It will be remembered that in table IV Jim is reported to have made 29 out of the last 30 trials correct, after a four seconds delay. As his work progresses on the two compartment experiments, the period of delay increases. Since a very large proportion of his errors on the three com- partment experiments were due to a tendency to drop out the middle box, he would be expected to make a higher percentage of correct reaction with this box omitted. Such is shown to be the case in the data below. Of the 40 trials given Jim on six seconds delay 34 were cor- rect. He escaped from the laboratory on the third day, after his work, and after 36 hours absence was recovered and made 80% on 10 trials. Feeling sure that the cat was experiencing no difficulty, the experimenter increased the period of delay to 104 JOSEPH U. YARBROUGH eight seconds. Jim was given 30 trials with this period of delay 27 of which were correct. As he appeared to meet no difficulty in bridging this period, he was set to work on ten seconds delay where he reacted 28 times correctly in 30 trials. On twelve seconds delay he made 90% on 30 trials. Since he had so successfully bridged over these small advances in delays, the next increase was double in length, i.e., four seconds. Forty trials were given with a delay of sixteen seconds. The problem did not seem to increase in difficulty for 36 of these 40 presenta- tions were reacted to correctly. The longest period of delay in which a regular series of experi- ments were offered was eighteen seconds. One hundred tests were given Jim on this period of delay, and of this number he responded correctly to 91. During these experiments, Jim was observed as closely as possible as to the orientation of head and body when the door of the release box went up, and also at the moment he initiated the movement of response. The matter of orientation will be taken up again under the discussion of " behavior during delay." (b) Cats tested on sound. — Bess and Phil had been dropped back to the two seconds delay before the middle box was dropped out. Beginning with the two seconds delay they were promoted simultaneously from one interval of delay to another. Figured on the basis of 30 trials, Bess' percentage jumped from 66 to 95, and Phil's from 80 to 96. On the four seconds delay no difficulty was met. After 40 trials, — Bess with 93% and Phil with 99, — they were promoted to the six seconds delay. Here they received 40 trials, Bess making 95%, while Phil made only 77%. This low percentage on the part of Phil was caused by a pronounced position habit which appeared on the first day and lasted through the second day of the series. They each received 30 trials on both the eight and the ten seconds delays, and each held a percentage of about 85. Since these periods were bridged so easily, the period of delay was now lengthened to fourteen seconds. On this interval of delay, 40 trials were given, and Bess held 87%, while Phil made 98%. Ninety trials were made by each cat on the sixteen seconds delay. Of these 90 trials, Bess was successful 84 times, and Phil 81 times. Dur- ing this last period of delay of 90 trials, special observation was made of orientation. These observations were recorded in detail, THE DELAYED REACTION IN CATS 105 and will be carefully considered under " behavior during delay and after release." (c) Maximal interval of delay attained with two boxes. — Table TABLE VII Maximal Number Per cent Animal delay of trials correct Hunter Rats- No. 4 1 sec. 20 75 No. 11 5 sees. 70 81 No. 15 5 sees. 60 67 No. 16 5 sees. 50 90 Dog- Blackie 3 mins. 30 86 Raccoons- Jack . . . 20 sees. 40 85 Betty 10 sees. 30 86 Bob 25 sees. 20 90 Walton 1 min. 10 80 Present work . .Cats — • Set A- -Jim 18 sees. 90 90 SetB- -Bess 16 sees. 90 93 Phil 16 sees. 90 90 VII gives the maximal delay attained on two boxes by the subjects studied by Hunter, Walton's dogs, and the cats of the present experiments. The cats rank very well with Hunter's raccoons in successfully bridging delays with two boxes. Just what interval of delay could finally be bridged with the two box tests is not known. It is evident from the above table that the limit of the cats' ability was not reached. I see no reason why the interval may not be increased even into minutes. This opinion is based upon the fact that the records show many reactions where the period of delay is of much longer duration than eighteen seconds, the greatest recorded in the above table. The following long periods of delay were each followed by successful reaction. Phil lengthened his delay period- twice during this period of 90 trials, once to twenty seconds and once to twenty-two seconds. Jim reacted correctly after three such periods of delay, twenty-four seconds, twenty-six seconds, and thirty seconds. Bess was successful after the fol- lowing delays : 1 twenty seconds duration, 3 twenty-two seconds, 1 twenty-four, 1 twenty-six, 1 thirty-two, 2 thirty-six, 1 forty- two, and 1 fifty-two seconds duration. It will be noted that all animals delayed much longer with 106 JOSEPH U. YARBROUGH two than with three boxes. This is readily explained on the basis of the relative complexity of the problems, and the effect of continued training. 3. Behavior During Delay and After Release Four different types of behavior appeared in our experiments: (1) The animal maintained an orientation of all its body during the interval of delay, i.e., it kept both its head and body point- ing toward the proper box; (2) the animal kept either its head or its body in perfect orientation; (3) no observable part of the animal's body was retained in constant position, i.e., the experi- menter could detect no orientation cues used by the animal, (4) the animal held some certain position in the box, i.e., it actually went to the point in the release box nearest to the proper compartment and there awaited to be released. Types 1, 2, and 3 will be combined for convenience in the discussion, and will be followed by a consideration of 4. A. Orientation of whole or part of body. — Great pains were taken to insure accuracy in the recording of orientations. Records were kept not only of the body position, but of whether any observable part of the animal remained in a constant position during the delay period. Also note was made of any case where the animal turned partly or entirely around, as well as of the direction in which it turned. In order to obtain as accurate data as possible on orientation, a series of 300 tests were specially given where the orientations of both the head and body were recorded at the moment the door of the release box went up, and again when the animal made its first motion to leave the box. Tables VIII and IX give a summary of these reactions showing just what orientations preceded them. In the first table only those tests are recorded where the orientation was different when the animal started from what it was when the door went up. While in the second table all tests are recorded where the orientation was the same when the animal started as it was when the release door went up. TABLE VIII When door went up: Correct Wrong Good orientation of head only 108 1 Good orientation of body only 30 1 Good orientation of head and body 1 18 0 Poor orientation of head and body 18 24 THE DELAYED REACTION IN CATS 107 TABLE Will— Continued When animal started : Correct Wrong Good orientation of head only 2 0 Good orientation of body only 0 1 Good orientation of body and head 259 3 Poor orientation of body and head 9 26 TABLE IX Good Bad Good orientation lost between release and starting 107 1 Good orientation not lost between release and starting .40 0 Poor orientation at release and at starting 4 12 This table indicates plainly the similarity of the behavior of my cats and Hunter's rats and dogs. The cats almost never reacted in opposition to their orientation. (Here I mean, of course, the orientation of both head and body, for many times they reacted correctly in accordance with only the head or the body.) Of 141 errors made by one of Hunter's dogs, 116 were preceeded by faulty orientation. So, also, the cats' errors, as the table shows, were in almost every case preceded by faulty orientation. The non-orientation reactions are few enough to be accounted for by chance. B. Position in the box. — Owing to the fact that during the period of long delays only two boxes were used and they were located far apart, the cats could have shifted their behavior from the use of orientation cues to the use of position cues. In- formation on this point was hard to get: (1) Because of the continuous movements of the animals, and (2) because the size of the release box in comparison with the distance to the exit box is so small that but little is gained by being at one side or the other. However, from the few observations made, the writer is of the opinion that the position of the animal in the release box does aid its reaction. 4. Reaction Tendencies In order to get representative data on errors and position habits and the frequency with which these stereotyped forms of response interfered with the work, I shall present 610 of Jim's and 630 of Bess' reactions. It will be remembered that Jim was tested on light and Bess on sound. The first 320 of Jim's 610 reactions were made on the three box experiments, while the remaining 290 were made with only two. Position habits in which one particular box was always chosen first, occurred 108 JOSEPH U. YARBROUGH with each animal on each of the three boxes. Now one box was chosen first and now another. For convenience these data will be recorded in two separate tables (X and XI), the first containing data recorded on the three box experiments, and the second, those obtained when only two boxes were used. TABLE X Three Box Experiments Total reactions Order of response abc acb ab ac made Jim 7 3 22 1 33 Bess 7 1 22 4 34 Order of response bac bca ba be Jim 0 10 1 2 Bess 2 0 7 3 12 Order of response cab cba ca cb Jim 8 6 3 23 40 Bess 0 3 4 15 22 Table X analyzes all incorrect responses made on the three box experiments, here included, and gives the relative number of times each subject followed the different possible orders. The number of errors made beginning with boxes a and c is about equal with both animals, while the number beginning with b is very low. In fact, as the table shows, Jim only made 2 errors when b was selected first. Bess, however, made 12 such errors, or about one-half the number she made after selecting c first. Of the 40 times Jim selected c first, he selected b next 29, or 72% of the time. And of the 33 times he selected a first, 29, or 87% of the time b was the next box selected. When a was selected first by Bess, she chose b next 29 times out of 34, or 85% of the time. And when she selected c first, she chose b next 18 times out of 22, or 81% of the time. It may be con- cluded then, that whenever the reaction began at the end of the row of boxes, i.e., a or c, the tendency was to take the boxes in order until the solution was reached. Only three times in 320 trials did Jim go to the same box twice in the same trial. (These are listed in table XII as ' persistent errors.") The form of this position habit was c b c b a, and was repeated three times within 20 trials. Bess returned to the same box in the same trial only one time, and the order of the boxes chosen was babe. One further thing to be noted is that Jim made 25 " three place errors," responses where the animal tests each THE DELAYED REACTION IN CATS 109 of the three boxes before the solution is reached. This type of error was made 13 times by Bess. This form of behavior is apparently less frequent than in Hunter's child1 and far less frequent than in Hamilton's dog.4 TABLE XI Two Box Experiments* Total reactions Order of response abc ac bac ba made Jim 0 14 0 0 14 Bess 6 14 0 0 20 Order of response bca be cba ca Jim 0 0 0 15 15 Bess 0 0 0 6 6 * Since exit b is no longer open, all orders of choice ending in b are omitted in this table. Table XI contains a record of the errors made in the two box experiments. Jim had so completely lost the cue to b that not one time after that box was dropped out did he return to it. Although Bess never made b her first choice again, she at six different times on her way from a over to c stopped by and examined b. It will be noticed that the number of errors greatly decreased with the elimination of the middle box. This may be accounted for, first, by the increase in the simplicity of the problem and, second, by practice. It would be well worth while to put beside the reaction ten- dencies of these two cats similar data gathered by Hunter on rats, raccoons, dogs, and children. Table XII gives a sum- mary of the errors made by his subjects, and includes, also,, those for my two cats. Some explanation of this table is necessary. TABLE XII Total Three Persis- Per Per Number number place tent cent cent of of errors errors errors of of Animal trials A B C AtoBBtoC Child 264 120 54 6 44 11 Raccoon— Bob 720 209 78 29 32 37 Dog— Blackie 570 127 75 25 59 33 Rat— No. 9 575 144 42 13 29 30 No. 2 345 152 69 47 45 68 Cat— Jim 320 75 25 3 33 12 Bess 330 68 13 1 19 7 3 Hunter, W. S. The delayed reaction in a child. Psych. Rev., 1917, vol. 24, 74-87. 4 Hamilton, G. V. T. An experimental study of an unusual type of reaction in a dog. Jour. Comp. Neitr. Psy., 1907, 17, 329-341. 110 JOSEPH IT. YARBROUGH The raccoon's records include delays from one second through twenty seconds; those for the dog, from one second through seven seconds; those for rat No. 9, from the third stage of delay (turning light off just as the animal was released) through seven seconds; those for rat No. 2, from the third stage of the delay through one second ; and those for Jim and Bess, from one second through four seconds. The data are compiled here for compara- tive purposes and will be easily interpreted without further comment. Available data at the time of the preparation of Hunter's paper on the delayed reaction in a child made it clear that there were no marked differences between animals in the reaction tendencies displayed under the experimental conditions in ques- tion. It did look, however, as though there were marked dif- ferences between the animals and the child. Our data here presented place the cats in a class with the child. So far then as this type of test is concerned, no essential differences between man and other animals have been brought to light. CONCLUSIONS 1. All the cats herein tested learned the initial association within from 100 to 180 trials and therefore fall into a class with Hunter's raccoons, so far as rapidity of learning is concerned. 2. No differences of method in solution of delays was observed between cats on light and those on sound. 3. The minimum and maximum delays were two seconds and four seconds on the three compartment experiments; while with only two compartments, they increased to sixteen seconds and eighteen seconds respectively. 4. The cats solved the problem by maintaining gross motor attitudes of the whole or part of the body. TEMPERAMENTAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OUTBRED AND INBRED STRAINS OF THE ALBINO RAT NENOZO UTSURIKAWA From Hie Harvard Psychological Laboratory INTRODUCTION About two years ago the writer sought, in the Harvard Psy- chological Laboratory, training in the methods of comparative psychology, since such training promised to be helpful to him as an ethnologist. A problem was suggested to him by Pro- fessor R. M. Yerkes, — evidently difficult and yet extremely fascinating. Its thorough study would certainly require years of diligent work. But the writer, because of his ethnological interests, was able to give only one year to this psychological investigation. Obviously enough, from what follows, the ' materials to be presented are fragmentary and inadequate for the description of the differences in the strains of rat. Still, to throw them away would seem too extravagant. With a humble sense of obligation, the writer offers his limited data to the scientific world. He wishes to take this opportunity to thank Professor Yerkes, Dr. R. M. Elliott, and Dr. W. R. Miles, for valuable assistance in the work. PROBLEMS The chief problem was to discover, if any, the temperamental differences between outbred and inbred strains of the albino rat. Such features of behavior as degree of nervousness or timidity, of savageness and wildness, of sensitiveness to stimuli, of persistence in response, quickness of response, and so on, may be recorded as constituting the temperament of an animal. In the terms of psychology, and in the last analysis, perhaps, tem- perament is identical with the threshhold, quickness, amount, and steadiness of response to a given stimulus or object. The 112 NENOZO UTSURIKAWA problem, therefore, requires the measurement of the essential components of temperament in order that comparisons of the two strains may be made. Although the inquiry was directed mainly to temperamental characteristics, differences in behavior of other sorts were noted and may here be reported. From the anthropologist's point of view, the study of close inbreeding and its consequences, even in case of lower animals, is of extreme interest and of some practical importance. Anthropological data concerning this mat- ter are meager, and as Topinard remarks, " the question is still sub judice." Possibly it is not far from the truth to say that such information concerning man will long be lacking, whereas, through the study of infra-human organisms, we can readily approach reliable information. Infra-human psychology gains in importance as it allies itself with human psychology, and this paper, if not projected upon the background of larger human interests, will lose much of its significance. There is such meager literature on temperamental character- istics of lower animals that a historical summary is unnecessary. The contribution of Basset1 to the study of albino rats alone has fairly direct bearing upon the materials of this paper. SUBJECTS Only albino rats were observed. All were obtained either from the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology in Phila- delphia or from Miss A. E. C. Lathrop, Granby, Mass. The several inbred rats were from the inbred strain of the Wistar Institute. We are greatly indebted for them to Dr. H. H. Donaldson and Dr. H. D. King. The accompanying list sup- plies the reader with all available data concerning individuals on whom the observations of this report were made. Outbred Stock Number Experiment of rat Source and parentage Date of birth begun 251 &... .Granby* August 5, 1914 October 14, 1914 252 9 " " ' " 253 & " " 254 9 " " 1 Basset, G. C. Habit formation in a strain of albino rats of less than normal brain weight. Behavior Monographs, 1914, 2, no. 4. Number of rat 1 C?. 2 9 . 3 d. 4 9. 261 d. 262 9 . 263 d\ 264 9 . 265 d. 266 9 . TEMPERAMENTAL DIFFERENCES IN ALBINO RATS 113 Outbred Stock— Continued Experiment Source and parentage Date of birth begun Wistar September — , 1914 . . . November 5, 1914 Granby, 251 c A x 252 9 . .October 28, 1914 March 2, 1915 - ' T" ' i 7 M ' 1 1 X_! II1! i i \/ i ' \ i ! ' : i « ; ' . ' , ' ! i ' i r" ; ! , rh L \ ! i.i i ^ "S^ ' i ^ ] " r 'S. ^^ kJ ^\ ^w V ^y I -r r ■ i ' M*^^ ^ V f^^ ^^^^ ■ I' 1 1 ' ' II 1 m^ * j-r^ iii ' Tr H*. rt 1 | ; I i Stt ■ . i ~n — i 1 — 1 " "" i ' *"' H~! ^^^ ^v

j" v* s* /•*- IT* JW< ,< /* 6t ?t £ , 100 « , 5*^ y*> s* «* ; * /*- /**- a^ jw /* j-x <*■ ;■ Figure 3. — Curves showing first responses of four white rats to stationary and moving lights. Per cent of correct choices for each successive ten trials. Average time in tenths of seconds. 164 CORA D. REEVES The experiment. — Both A and B formed a rather persistent habit of going to the left hand box so that the first day's records of per cent of food choices have no significance. The days fol- lowing, this habit was weakening and the correct choices in- creased. The preceding curves, fig. 3, show that A was slow in response as was also C, while B and D were habitually quicker in response. The curves show also that there was learning where the rats went to the moving stimulus, but with the others less high percentages of correct choice were made. Some ten- dency to decrease the average time for the day appeared. On the eighth day, after two days of perfect record, the rat C was terrorized by a stranger with a dog entering the labo- ratory while this rat was on the table. An attempt to get again two days' perfect records caused the work to be prolonged for two months. After about two weeks (160 trials for each rat) the number of trials per day was increased to 20. There was an immediate increase in the average time per trial as shown by the following curve, fig. 4, which is made up from the time records of the four averaged for successive trials. The later trials for each day were slower. Evidently though only small portions of food were allowed each time the hunger stimulus was lessened after a few successful trials. Seconds ^vjeT^geJ of z.o fr'ial* AuerAQet of ioo trials Figure 4. — Curve showing time in seconds for response to stimulus for four white rats while discriminating between still and moving lights during successive trials. DISCRIMINATION EXPERIMENT WITH WHITE RATS 165 The first part of the curve is made by averaging together the averages of the successive 20 trials of each of the four rats; the last part the averages are for 100 consecutive trials. The increase of time toward the end of the experiment is not easily accounted for. The age of the rats may be one factor. They, however, were not old but were then only full grown. The weather was warmer, and temperature and humidity may be other factors. The rats A and C were from the first (shown in fig 3) until the last days slower than B and D. For C the time average for the last 80 trials was 30 seconds. There is, then, no correlation between accuracy and speed of response. The rat A was the only one that toward the close of the experi- ment showed a reduction of the average time. Reference to the table which follows will show that the per cent of correct choices for this rat increases remarkably with the last 100 trials. Table Showing Average Per Cent of Correct Choices in Discrimi- nation of Stationary and Swinging Lights 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th Food at stationary lights: 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Rat A 40 40 61 57 69 69 90 RatB 57.5 52 53 64 58 63 78 Average 48.2 486 57 60 63.5 66 84 Food at swinging light : RatC 76.5 66 68 71 76 86 86 RatD 55 68 58 68 68 77 87 Average 65.7 67 63 68.5 72.5 81 86 Averages 57 56.5 60 65 68 71 85 The slowness and difficulty of establishing this discrimination is apparent from the table. The error curves (fig. 5 on page 166) show the same slow pro- cess of learning to discriminate and further emphasize the tendency of the rats to go to the moving rather than the still light. The use of only four individuals makes the results less certain than would be the case had a larger number been used. The records of rat A have frequent notes, as ' Watching, moving back and forth, swinging or nodding while advancing." This diagram of a path taken by A (fig. 6) shows a frequent sort of behavior for this individual, which was being fed at the still light. The starts toward the moving light were frequent and were followed by a pause and a run toward the still light. The swaying or nodding motion, rhythmic with the light, was 106 CORA D. REEVES 00 70 fco F y TOT Qu T V t T o -r E.TTOT Q^OTUt i»T /ih X^- h* y*- **X ^ 7£-/j*Ku^i*- f-ttLtMr Figure 5.— I. Curve of error for rats A and B, fed at the stationary lights. II. Curve of error for rats C and D, fed at the moving lights. These show the average per cent of errors for each 100 trials. Figure 6. — Path taken by rat A in reaching the stationary light. DISCRIMINATION EXPERIMENT WITH WHITE RATS 167 observed in rats A, C and D. While C and D started toward the still light at times, I have no records of paths of repeated starts and halts with change of direction as in the case of A. Testing results. — To determine whether some clue given by the experimenter might not be the ground upon which the rats discriminated, Dr. Karl S. Lashley kindly tested the rats in my absence. There was an average of 80% of correct choices. In order to test further the significance of the results the rats which had been trained to go to the still light were placed as usual but with both lights still. They went equally to either box. A strange reaction occurred, for upon coming to the door- way of the box whose lamp had been swinging, when the vibrisse lightly touched the edges, rat A stopped, squealed, turned back and went over to the box which had had the still light. Ap- parently some sensation from contact dominated his reaction. The same halt at the doorway occurred when the rat C was presented with both lights swinging and he went to the box which had had the still light. One day when the rats trained to go to a swinging light were presented with both lights swinging in the middle of the day's series, the rat C for the four tests given, went to the box where accustomed' to feed, but when the lamp which had been stationary was set swinging, while the light previously made to swing was still, this rat went to the box with the swinging light. D, when both lights were swinging, went to either box. The per cent of choices of the food box changed for this rat from 94 under standard conditions to 40 when both lamps were in motion. In other words, they went freely to the box which they had consistently avoided when the light stimuli were reversed. This fact together with the fact of the halt upon touching with the vibrisse the wrong box seemed conclusive evidence that the lights and not some other factor had been the effective one in making the choice when at a distance. After this halt at the doorway I noted that the small roughnesses of the edges of the doorway made by the saw were, of course, not exactly alike. I suspected that by chance or from attraction of the swinging lamp the rat C went to that box often and was then able to track himself but the evidence seems conclusive that the moving stimulus came to be the stimulus depended upon in reaching the box and food. 168 CORA D. REEVES Discussion of results. — The large number of trials (700) neces- sary to establish this discrimination seems to indicate how small a part the visual stimulus, has in the daily life of a rat. Had it not been for the records of the first week and especially of rat C (fig. 3) and the lack of any adequate explanation other than ' ' learning to discriminate ' ' which would account for the improvement both in choice and in time, the conclusions (after each had had 200 trials) would have been that rats cannot dis- criminate a moving and still light. (See table.) The rats came in time to select the food box more accurately. In the fact that the rats halted at the doorway of the boxes where they had not been receiving food is an indication that they used other criteria than the lights when they reached the food box. They were, however, not able to select the right box when the con- dition of movement of the lamps was changed. It seems pos- sible that some laboratory failures to find that animals possess as acute sensory mechanisms as have been popularly ascribed to them may be from the fact that the problem presented was not fitted to the animals tested. This incident will illustrate. At the close of this series of experiments an old rat which had been handled continually for some months was running about the room when the writer chanced to be winding up a piece of cord. As the end of the cord was drawn along the floor the rat followed, patted the end, for some eighteen inches, as a kitten would. This rat was tested several times with a cord but would never repeat the behavior. The rat became familiar with a new situation quickly but the stimulation afforded by a moving object could not be doubted. The effectiveness of movement in controlling reactions is shown in the difference in the curves (fig. 5) and in the path of the rat as shown in fig. 6. The length- ened average time when 20 trials per day were used instead of 10 confirms the evidence already presented that a large number of daily repetitions is not the most advantageous method of establishing a given discrimination. CONCLUSIONS 1. Rats can and do discriminate a stationary from a moving light. 2. Rats show some tendency to approach a moving rather than a stationary light. A NOTE ON THE INTERFERENCE OF VISUAL HABITS IN THE WHITE RAT BINNIE D. PEARCE From the Psychological Laboratory of the University of Texas INTRODUCTION The following experiments were performed at the University of Texas under the supervision of Professor W. S. Hunter,, from January to June, 1916. This paper should be considered as a continuation of researches made by him and should be read in connection with his paper on " The Interference of Auditory Habits in the White Rat."1 The purpose of the present tests was to obtain data showing the strength of habit in the white rat by measuring the effect of a habit previously acquired upon the formation of a new habit of opposite char- acter. The stimuli in each case were lights. The results appear to reinforce the conclusions reached by Dr. Hunter, viz., that a habit acquired by training does persist in the new work and may interfere tremendously with the formation of a dissimilar habit. My detailed conclusions will be presented at the close of the paper. m Ill till III* '1 111 IIIH A A' — m — Figure 1. — Ground plan of the apparatus The apparatus used was a T-shaped discrimination box and is shown in fig. 1. A mazda light was placed in a small box Jour. Animal Behav., 1917, 7, 49-65 169 170 BINNIE D. PEARCE behind the main apparatus. Between the boxes was an aper- ture, O, covered with a piece of clear glass and a variable number of sheets of typewriter paper (Post Office bond). These varia- tions and the c.ps. employed will be given below. The light was controlled with a switch at S. The rat was expected to react to the presence or absence of light by turning to the left or the right as the conditions of the experiment required and as will be detailed later. When the reaction to the stimulus was correct, the animal escaped through an open alley (A) to food at F ; when incorrect, an electric shock was given "by means of the wires marked E and E' and a free exit was blocked by means of a movable end-stop, placed in the alley A'. At each trial the rat was introduced directly into the discrimination box through an opening at F and the stimulus was presented im- mediately. Punishment and reward was used throughout the test. The following series of presentations were used, 10 trials daily : llrlrrlrlr r 1 1 r r r 1 1 r 1 r r 1 r 1 1 r 1 1 r lrrlrrlrll EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS I The present experiment was begun with four untrained rats (adults). Later four new untrained rats were added. Of these one (No. 10) was 42 days old; one (No. 13), 37; and two (Nos. 14 and 15) 68 days old. Unless otherwise stated the results given are for all eight rats. On each of 3 consecutive days the animals were allowed to make 5 preliminary runs in the box, the object being to acquaint them with the apparatus and to accustom them to receiving their food at F. These trials were given without light stimulus, punishment or end-stops, save that the latter were used where necessary to prevent the appearance of position habits. In the regular test, habit No. 1, a correct response required the rat to turn through the right hand passage when light was present and through the left hand passage when the light was absent. The light used in this first test was a mazda 32 c.p:; THE INTERFERENCE OF VISUAL HABITS 171 shaded by one thickness of ordinary writing paper as men- tioned above. Table 1 shows the number of trials required by the rats in establishing the association. The standard of learning was as follows: Each of the last four series of 10 trials must show at least 8 correct reactions, but the average percentage of correct reactions for the four series must not be less than 87§%. The trials in table 1 include all given each rat up to the 40 made at the standard percentage. TABLE 1 Learning Habit No. 1 Rats Trials 1 170 2 180 3 80 4 190 10 300 13 220 14 60 15 120 A comparison of table 1 with similar data obtained by Dr. Hunter in his experiments on the acquisition of auditory habits2 is of value in showing a greater ease in the formation of visual habits by the white rat. My rats ranged between 60 and 300 trials with an average of 152. Dr. Hunter's rats, — from the same stock, working in the same apparatus on the same problem, but using sound as a stimulus, — ranged between 210 and 710 trials with an average of 423. This is a matter of great import- ance inasmuch as the explanation would appear to lie chiefly, if not wholly, in the different sensory channels involved. I call to mind no prior demonstration of this fact. Extended study, which would go far beyond this preliminary work, would un- doubtedly reveal important differences in vision and hearing so far as the daily life of the rat is concerned. As each rat learned the association, control series were intro- duced as follows : 1. No light used; no punishment. Reaction considered right if it fits the series. 2. An 8 c. p. mazda substituted for the standard light. Punishment used. 2 Op. cit., table 1. 172 BINNIE D. PEARCE The object of control 2 was to determine the similarity of the 8 and 32 c.p. stimuli in terms of response. A summary of the control tests is given in table 2. The chronological order of records has been preserved. The per cents represent correct responses in a given daily series of 10 trials. The low percent- ages made with control 1 indicate the rats' dependence upon the light as a determining stimulus. The high percentages made with control 2 indicate that the rats sensed the light and that it meant to turn to the right in order to secure food. The ex- ceptions to this statement are shown in the table. TABLE 2 Controls Used With Habit No. 1 Rats Control 1 2 3 4 10 13 14 15 Control 1 50% 80% 40% 50% 60% 60% 50% 50% Control 1 60 ' Normal 90 100 90 100 90 100 90 90 Normal 90 Control 1 50 . . 60 50 20 50 40 70 Normal 100 .. 90 90 60 100 90 90 Normal 90 Control 2 50 90 70 80 80 100 70 100 Control 2 80 Normal 60 100 90 90 90 100 70 100 Normal 100 Control 2 50 60 70 70 70 90 40 80 II Training on the second habit was instituted in the case of each rat as soon as the results of the first test had been analysed by controls as shown above. The second habit furnished a problem the opposite of habit No. 1. Its purpose was to train the rats to associate turning to the left with the presence of light and to the right for the absence of light. The 8 c.p. light of the control tests was the stimulus here. At first it was shaded by three thicknesses of the writing paper. But when rat No. 3, the first rat tested on habit 2, persisted in reacting to this stimulus as he did to the absence of light, I removed one thickness. The purpose was to secure a light which would be treated the same as the standard light and yet which should It u u a u a a a a « tt a a « « « « a u u a u a u « THE INTERFERENCE OF VISUAL HABITS 173 be as different in intensity as possible from the standard.3 The situation is summarized in table 3. The first reactions of the rat to the twice-shaded, 8 c.p. light were made as though this light were the standard light of habit 1. (Reactions to the normal stimulus should give at least 80% correct. Reactions to darkness would all be made to the left and so would give 50% correct. Since the new series, habit 2, was the reverse of the " normal " series, when the rat treated the stimulus as though it were the normal standard light, he should make not more than 20% correct.) I now knew that the once-shaded TABLE 3 Test Correct in 10 Normal (32 c.p., once shaded) 9 " 5 3 5 5 5 4 New series (8 c.p., twice shaded) 1 32 c.p. and the twice-shaded 8 c.p. would initiate the same responses. Furthermore, there was reason to assume, both from the behavior just cited and from the work of other investigators, that the lights were dissimilar enough in intensity (one being almost equivalent to darkness) that they could be readily dis- criminated by a rat when tested in the conventional discrimi- nation box. In this second test every effort was made to keep the conditions identical with the first test save in the matter of light stimulus and direction of turning. The results are very striking. In the first test, the least number of trials given any rat was 60 and the greatest 300. In the second test, one rat learned in 420 trials. The other seven rats never completely learned the association, — ■ the trials given were 680, 760, 850, 1080, 1080, 1090, 1090, and 1160. At the close of the work these rats were improving so, that it seems probable that they would have mastered the problem had the training been more extended. The results of this test are summarized in table 3, The length of the training periods here as opposed to the learning periods with habit No. 1 3 It would be of value and interest to have animals form habit No. 2 with the same stimulus used in habit No. 1. My choice of stimulus for the second habit was guided by a desire to secure a procedure similar to that followed by Dr. Hunter. 174 BINNIE D. PEARCE TABLE 4 Correct Reactions in Each Succeeding 50. Habit No. 2 Rats Trials 1 2 3 4 10 13 14 15 50 13 5 23 13 14 9 21 12 100 18 16 17 7 11 13 17 16 150 16 20 10 13 12 12 15 27 200 13 20 18 17 16 14 20 17 250 20 17 27 18 17 9 21 30 300 12 15 23 24 18 13 21 34 350 14 19 25 14 17 15 31 31 400 10 20 26 18 18 16 32 43 450 15 20 25 16 23 26 32 15 of 20 500 17 18 18 19 25 25 30 550 19 19 25 21 28 27 41 600 15 10 22 23 26 29 41 650 17 16 22 26 21 33 34 700 17 21 24 25 22 27 27 of 30 750 22 17 28 31 27 26 800 29 26 32 28 3 26 850 22 24 29 30 of 24 900 22 32 30 28 10 950 25 27 30 41 1000 27 35 32 33 1050 30 41 27 33 1100 26 20 29 24 1150 of of 31 of 1160 40 30 7 of 10 40 are not to be explained by variations in age (which were too small) or in experimental conditions. The essential factor is the interference of habit No. 1 with the formation of habit No. 2. The following is a brief examination of representative data secured on habit No. 2. Rat No. 3 had acquired the first habit with great facility after 80 trials. After 1160 trials on the second association he was making only 31 correct reactions out of a possible 50. This rat when set upon the new problem was in perfect condition and had shown no tendency to untoward timidity or the formation of position habits. When presented with the second problem, he at first reacted to the stimuli (8- c.p. light for turning to left; darkness for turning right) as if they had been the former stimuli (32-c.p. light for turning right and darkness for turning left). Upon punishment he imme- diately set up position habits from which he could be forced only with difficulty and into which he fell again and again. Several times he slowly approached the standard of learning; but when THE INTERFERENCE OF VISUAL HABITS 175 he seemed about to attain it, the position habit would again appear. This conduct was characteristic of all rats, save that rat No. 15 did master the problem. This error-behavior need not be regarded in its entirety as an interference phenomenon, because it occurs in the course of all difficult problems. How- ever, it is to be remembered that the present discrimination of light from darkness is not a difficult problem. Table 5 gives sample records illustrating the above factual statements concern- ing position habits. TABLE 5 Diary Records Showing Fluctuating Behavior in Learning Habit No. 2 Rat No. 4 April 27 8 28 9 29 5 30 5 May 1 5 2 6 15-22 8,8,8,9,6,6,7,5 Rat No. 14 May 16-28 8, 9, 8, 8, 8, 7, 7, 6, 10, 9, 9, 7, 4 III Rat. No 15 was the only one who mastered habit No. 2. This animal was 68 days old when first tested. He acquired habit No. 1 in 120 trials (tables 1 and 2), was put through the controls and immediately started upon habit No. 2. This was mastered in 420 trials (table 4). A control similar to control 1, used in analyzing habit No. 1, was instituted and proved that No. 15 was reacting to the stimulus (light) presented. A third problem was then set No. 15, — a test in retention. The rat was put back on habit No. 1, the operator again using as stimulus the 32-c.p. light (shaded as before in habit 1). The rat was tested for 15 days, 10 trials daily. Habit No. 2 per- sisted and interfered with the training on habit No. 1 so that the percentage of correct reactions never exceeded 50 for any 10 trials. By the close of the 150 trials a position habit of always going to the left had fixed itself upon the rat with such tenacity that tests were discontinued. I have plotted three curves, fig. 2, which present graphically the learning processes detailed above. The curves are con- 176 BINNIE D. PEARCE structed as follows: The total number of trials given a rat prior to the 40 made at the standard is divided into 10 parts. The percentage of correct reactions in each one-tenth is then computed and an average for all rats taken. The resulting curve shows the progress of error elimination independently of the absolute number of trials and is thus representative through- out its length. N indicates the records during the 40 trials made at the standard percentage. % / / 1 7o yr\j>92 102 7/4i C/)-LE CA-L E >343 12 06k CALEC t6S 68 7A \l2l8l ,93 vTn, CA-LE \"S\J4S TV 104 'I, H [78\ fh J 242 ,66* Ik h .94i H- A,< 7/1 // /25 dd\ 59k a^J C/I-Le\U7) \l 116 gW # Gu$ d f09\ :al£/2c JSO-j t\t* r/2/\ SH H- £rG 38 r ,ca-le Figures 64—121. 256 PLATE 3 Figures 122—165. PLATE 4 257 2--33J Figures 166—207. 258 PLATE 5 4 38$ 4=45 if Figures 208—249. MAZE STUDIES WITH THE WHITE RAT I. Normal Animals HARVEY CARR University of Chicago INTRODUCTION The work of Watson, Bogardus and Henke, Vincent, et. al. has shown that the white rat learns the standard type of maze primarily in tactual and kinaesthetic terms, that during the learning the control is gradually transferred from contact to kinaesthesis, and that after the problem is thoroughly mastered the act is to be regarded as a kinaesthetic-motor coordination with an occasional reliance upon contact in times of emergency. The neglect of the senses of vision, audition, and smell in the process of acquisition is not due to any functional incapacity of these senses. Miss Vincent has demonstrated quite con- clusively that with a proper arrangement of the mazes both vision and smell will be effectively utilized in the development of the maze habit. Neither can it be affirmed that no optical, auditory, or olfactory data are present in the standard maze situation; rather we must conclude that for the rat organization these data as compared with those of contact and kinaesthesis are inadequate for the solution of this particular kind of a problem. The maze habit can be regarded as a definite sensori- motor coordination which was developed and which functions within a larger sensory environment. Many of these environing sensory conditions remain relatively constant and stable during the mastery of the maze. Our experiments were designed to test the dependence of the maze coordination upon the stability of the wider sensory environment in which it was developed. The method consists of varying these environmental conditions while the maze is being learned or after it is mastered. In the usual type oj experiment the rats are transferred from the living cage (kept in a constant position) to the maze located in a different 259 260 HARVEY CARR environment. It is thus possible to alter the sensory conditions of the animal while running the maze, or to effect changes in the environment prior to the test. Various maze patterns were employed in the experiments. Unless otherwise stated, the mazes were of the usual type with the exception that they were almost water tight and covered by closely fitting glass covers. These features are mentioned because presumably they may effect the sensory relation of the animal to the extraneous environment. In order to alter the objective environment of the maze, recourse was had to a canvas top. A light but rigid frame was constructed and placed upon the maze. Over this was stretched several thicknesses of canvas fastened at the top but hanging loose on the four sides. From the top was suspended an electric lamp. The interior could thus be illumined or darkened, any of the four side curtains could be raised or lowered, or the whole top could be removed or replaced at will. This paper describes the experimental results on animals with intact sense organs. Nearly two hundred rats were utilized in the various tests. Some of the results were secured by students working under my direction. The majority of the tests were performed by the writer. The disturbances induced by the alterations were measured in terms of the error record. These records embrace such features as the number of animals affected, the number of trials in which error was present, the number of errors, the length of time necessary to adapt to the novel situation, and the tendency for the disturbing effect to be carried over to subsequent tests under normal conditions. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS A. Alteration of conditions previous to running the maze. Variable Route. In the typical experiment the living cage is kept on a rack some distance from the maze and the animals are carried by hand and placed within the maze. This route was kept constant while the maze was being mastered. After mastery this route was altered in various ways. Sometimes a long and devious route through the laboratory was chosen. Fourteen rats were tested and no disturbing effects were noted. Method of Handling. The normal method of handling was MAZE STUDIES WITH THE WHITE RAT 261 varied by inducing a condition of dizziness just before placing the animals in the maze. The rats were held at arm's length and whirled rapidly around in horizontal and vertical circles and then placed in the maze. The dizziness effects were evident in the animal's behavior. They experienced difficulty in stand- ing erect, crouched down on the floor of the maze, and waited for the effects to disappear before attempting to run. Twelve animals were employed and no disturbances were present. Position of Cage. After the maze was learned, the living cage was transported to a new position in the laboratory, care being taken to preserve its original cardinal orientation. This alter- ation introduces two new features, a new route to the cage, and a new sensory environment previous to the maze reaction. Since variations in the route are without effect, this aspect of the alteration may be neglected. The duration of the exposure to the novel environment prior to the test was varied; the animals were tested either 15 minutes or 24 hours after the alteration. The distance over which the cage was moved also varied. Ten animals were tested. Seventy per cent of these were affected, and the disturbance was present in but 41 per cent of their trials. The degree of disturbance varied with the degree of alteration. One group of six rats was subjected to alternating small and large shifts in the position of the cage and the resulting average error records were .58 and 1.75 respectively. The animals quickly adapt themselves to these changes. Most of the disturbances resulted from the 15 minute exposures and in this case the disturbing effect had generally disappeared on the subsequent day's test. There was no evidence that the effects persisted for any length of time after a return to normal conditions. Covering Cage. After the maze was mastered, the living cage was entirely covered with several thicknesses of canvas. This substituted a homogeneous for a heterogeneous visual environ- ment and reduced the illumination of the cage very appreciably. The animals were kept in this environment for a day before the first test. Forty-five animals were subjected to the experiment. But one rat exhibited signs of disturbance and the effect was present only in the first day's test. Rotation of Cage. The living cage was rotated in reference to the cardinal positions while remaining in the same position. 262 HARVEY CARR The shifts employed were 90, 180, 270 degrees. The duration of exposure to the novel conditions prior to the test was varied. Three groups of animals were utilized and the conditions differed so that a separate description for each group is necessary. 1. The first group consisted of six rats and both living cage and the maze were uncovered. The rats were first subjected to the new orientation for 15 minutes and then tested in the maze. The cage was then returned to its normal orientation and control tests were given on the second day. On the third day the animals were tested for the effects of a 15 minute exposure to a different orientation. No animal was disturbed by these 15 minute exposures. Exposures of 24* hours were given for three orientations on successive days. All of the rats were disturbed by these alterations. The average error record per trial for six tests was 2.86. Errors were present, however, in but 40 per cent of the trials. There was a marked individual difference in susceptibility, the number of errors ranging from 3 to 44. The degree of the disturbance increased with successive shifts, though the rats quickly adapted themselves when kept in a given orientation. 2. The cage was covered with the canvas top and then rotated. The animals were tested in an uncovered maze. The group consisted of forty-five rats. They were tested immediately after the rotation and then for several days in succession. Three successive shifts were made before the cage was returned to its normal orientation. But seven 6f the rats manifested signs of disturbance and the effect was slight and quickly eliminated. With one animal the effects were sufficiently obvious that a disturbance can hardly be doubted. The effect was present for the first day's test for two positions. 3. In this experiment the uncovered cage was rotated, and the animals were tested in a covered maze. The animals were subjected to one or more day's exposure to each new orientation before being tested. Seventeen animals were employed, and signs of disturbance were noted for but five. The effect was so slight in four cases that one cannot be confident of the results. The disturbing effect was obvious for one rat for two of the new positions. MAZE STUDIES WITH THE WHITE RAT 263 B. Alteration of conditions while running the maze Degree of Hunger. After the maze was mastered, periods of four days of heavy feeding were alternated with similar periods of normal feeding.. We thus have the rats coming to the maze with different degrees of hunger, the object of the test being to determine the effect of strength of motive upon the accuracy of a well automatized act. Rats differ very materially in the length of the feeding period necessary to keep in good condition and to give consistent daily records. These individual differences are due to the rate of eating and the amount of food required. The normal time allowed for eating ranged from 5 to 7 minutes. The periods of heavy feeding were 15 to 20 minutes in length, the animals being allowed to gorge themselves to their utmost capacity. Ten rats were tested. Heavy feeding multiplied the average error record by twenty. All rats were affected in vary- ing degrees. Disturbance was present in but one-third of the trials. The degree of the disturbance was highly irregular from trial to trial. In general the effect increased at first and then decreased. Complete adaptation was never secured. Cleansing Maze. During the course of a long experiment, the maze will accumulate considerable filth in spite of the glass cover. This filth consists of faeces, wisps of cotton, shells of sunflower seeds, trackings of milk, and urine deposits. These were allowed to accumulate for considerable time and the maze was thoroughly cleansed and washed. The animals were tested on subsequent days to determine the effect of this alteration of conditions upon the accuracy of the maze habit. Ten rats were tested, and eight were affected. The greatest effect occurred on the second trial. Adaptation was secured in four trials. Errors were present in but 60 per cent of the tests. The average error record per trial for those affected was 1.75. Covering Maze. The rats were allowed to master the un- covered maze. The .canvas top described in the introductory section was then placed over the maze. In one case the interior of the top was illuminated when the rats were tested, and with another group it was not. A homogeneous maze environment was thus substituted for the customary heterogeneous one, and the illumination was either decreased or altered in character. Eighteen rats were subjected to these changes while running the maze, and none were disturbed in the slightest degree. This 264 HARVEY CARE fact would indicate that the rat does not rely upon stimuli from the extraneous environment during the later stages of the learning process. Uncovering Maze. The animals first mastered the maze while it was covered with the canvas top. After mastery this top was removed and the animals tested. Two slightly different exp e ments were performed. 1. The maze was mastered when the top was open on one side allowing poor daylight illumination of the interior. The top was now removed. Seven rats were tested and none were disturbed by the changes. 2. The maze was mastered while entirely closed and the interior illumined by an electric light. The top was now removed. There re- sulted the substitution of a heterogeneous for a uniform optical environment, and the introduction of daylight for artificial illumination. Ten rats were tested, and five were disturbed. The effects persisted from 1 to 6 trials. The errors were dis- tributed irregularly, and perfect records were secured in 70 per cent of the tests. The average error record for those affected was 1.07 as compared with a previous normal of .20. The total number of errors per animal varied from 3 to 11. Increase of Illumination. The maze was learned while entirely covered with the canvas top but without interior illumination. The interior was now illumined by the electric light. A well lighted uniform environment was thus substituted for a subdued one. Ten rats were tested, and seven were affected. The disturbance lasted from 1 to 6 trials. Errors were present in but 40 per cent of the tests. The average error record was 1.35 as compared with the previous record of .51. The total number of errors per individual varied from 4 to 47. Decrease of Illumination. An open maze was mastered. It was situated in front of an open window giving a good illumina- tion. After the maze was learned this window was covered so that practically all light from this source was excluded. This procedure decreased the illumination in the maze and altered its direction, without changing the character of the environing objects. Ten rats were tested and seven were disturbed. The effects lasted for 1 to 8 trials. The maximum effect occurred on the second test. Many trials were without error. The average error record was 3.18 as compared with a previous normal of .21. One animal made 40 errors in eight trials. After MAZE STUDIES WITH THE WHITE RAT 265 adaptation to the new conditions, a return to the normal situa- tion effected no disturbance. Position of the Experimenter. The experimenter maintained a constant position in reference to the maze while it was being learned. After mastery, this position was varied. After insert- ing the rats in the maze, the experimenter occupied a position on the opposite side of the maze from that in which he formerly had stood. Six rats were tested on successive days until all disturbance had subsided. All members of the group were affected in varying degree. Errors were present in 60 per cent of the tests. The average error record for three successive trials was 2.50 as compared with a previous normal of .11. The disturbance was eliminated in three trials. The total number of errors per rat for the three trials ranged from 2 to 18. The disturbance occurred only at that point in the maze path near which the experimenter stood. The path previous to and after this critical point was traversed normally. All error deviations were in the direction of the experimenter. A disturbance was frequently manifested by slow and hesitant movements and head and body orientations in the direction of the experimenter even when no errors were made. Rotation of a Uniform Environment. The maze was covered by the canvas top closed on all sides and the interior was illuminated by the electric light. Under these conditions vision of the objective environment was impossible to the human eye. This top was practically square (3', 9" by 4'), and as a consequence the optical environment was uniform. The top was now rotated 90 degrees between trials, the maze itself remaining stationary. Presumably the visual situation was not altered by this pro- cedure. Ten rats were tested, and no disturbance resulted. Rotation of Heterogeneous Environment. The maze was learned with the curtain of the canvas top open on one side. This curtain was now closed and that on another side was opened. This procedure was continued until all four sides were opened several times on successive days. The alteration pro- duced a change in the direction and intensity of the light as well as in the character of the optical environment. Seven rats were tested under these conditions, and five were affected by the novel conditions. These five animals made an average error record of 1.90 for six tests, and errors were present in 85 26G HARVEY CARR per cent of the trials. The disturbance due to the alteration persisted to some extent on the subsequent day's test in normal conditions. The number of errors per rat ranged from 9 to 15. A repetition of the test for each of the three novel situations exhibited a pronounced tendency toward adaptation, but the experiment was not continued until complete adaptation was secured. Position of the Maze. After being learned, the maze was removed to a new position in the laboratory but its original cardinal orientation was preserved. The maze was shifted about twelve feet in position but the shift was of such a character that the maze was now situated in practically a new environ- ment. This procedure involved two alterations; a change in the objective environment while running the maze, and a new route from the living cage to the maze. The latter factor has been shown to be non-effective and may thus be disregarded. Six rats were given three tests in the new position, and four were affected. These made errors in 55 per cent of the trials, and gave an average error record of 2.08. The number of errors per rat ranged from 4 to 10. The animals adapted quickly to the novel conditions, and in some cases a slight disturbance was evident on a return to the old position. Rotation of Maze. In this experiment the canvas top was not used, and as a consequence the maze was rotated in reference to a stationary heterogeneous environment. This experiment was first performed by Professor Watson and our results are in harmony with those secured by him. Unless otherwise specified, the three novel positions utilized were 90, 180, and 270 degrees. The tests were conducted on different mazes and with different procedures and thus need to be described separately. 1. The glass covered maze was used and tests were given for the three novel positions on successive days followed by a return to the original position on the fourth day. This pro- cedure was now repeated to determine the effect of adaptation. Ten rats were employed and all were disturbed. In the first shift, errors were present in 65 per cent of the trials, and an average error record of 6.95 was secured. The induced effect was occasionally carried over to the subsequent day's trial in the normal position. A repetition of the shifts disclosed a pronounced adaptive tendency. All members of the group were MAZE STUDIES WITH THE WHITE RAT 267 still affected but the percentage of perfect trials was increased from 35 to 53 and the error record was reduced from 6.95 to 1.72. The shifts were not continued until complete adaptation was effected. 2. The same conditions obtained in this experiment except that the maze was left in each new position until the disturbance was eliminated. After adapting to the three positions, the maze was returned to the normal position. This procedure was now repeated until complete adaptation was effected for the four rotary positions. Similar rotary shifts were now instituted between the 45, 135, 225, and 315 degree positions until adapta- , tion for these positions was effected. Fifteen animals were employed in the experiment. During the first rotation, thirteen animals were disturbed, and these gave an average error record of 10.7 for the first day for the three new situations. The rats were not affected in every trial, as perfect records were secured in 32 per cent of the first day's trials. Adaptation was effected for each position on an average of four trials. The induced disturbance was occasionally carried over to a slight extent to the normal position of the maze. The adaptation for each position secured in the first shift was not permanent. New rotations disclosed a further disturbance, but the effect gradually decreased with repeated shifts; fewer animals were disturbed, the errors became smaller, the percentage of perfect trials increased, there was less carrying over to the normal position, and the time necessary to adapt for each position was lessened. Complete adaptation was effected on the fifth repetition and thereafter the maze could be rotated at will between any of these four positions without disturbance. Complete adaptation for one series of positions does not, however, involve adaptation to another series of positions. Rotary shifts were now instituted between the 45, 135, 225, and 315 degree positions. In the first shift all of the rats were again disturbed. In the first day's trials for the four positions, the average error record was 7.2 with a percentage of perfect runs of 20. Adaptation was again effected with repeated tests. 3. A group of animals was rotated in a well illuminated and a darkened environment. The maze had been learned with the illuminated condition. The room was darkened by means of window shades. The animals were accustomed to running the 268 HARVEY CARR maze under both conditions before the rotation tests were given. One set of four rats were tested for three positions on successive days when the room was well illuminated. The tests were now repeated for the darkened environment and these were followed by a series with an illuminated maze. The average error records for the three conditions respectively were 7.15, 1.90, and 3.20. The final value for the illuminated environment is thus greater than that previously secured for the darkened condition in spite of the fact that animals tend to adapt to these rotary shifts when repeated. With a second set of six animals, complete adaptation was effected for three positions while the room was darkened. The room was then illuminated, and the tests were repeated. A disturbance was again evident. The disturbance could hardly be due to the sudden introduction of the light, as the maze had been learned under these conditions, and the rats had been accustomed to run the maze in its normal position while the room was illuminated. The results indicate that a maze rotation in reference to a well illuminated environment is more disturbing than a similar one in reference to a darkened environment. 4. A sideless maze was employed in the following experiment. This consists of a series of runways separated from each other by open spaces four inches in width. This maze differs from the standard maze usually employed in these experiments in several respects: — it is less complex as to number and length of alleys, the absence of sides eliminates the possibility of a contact guidance in traversing the paths, and the absence of the sides and the glass cover allows the animals a more intimate sensory contact with the objective environment. We were interested in comparing the degree of disturbance due to rotation on such a maze with that exhibited by animals in the standard maze. If rotation disturbs the animals because of the alteration in reference to the environment, the degree of disturbance in the sideless maze should be the greater. Five rats were tested. The average error record, and the number of trials necessary to secure adaptation were twice those for the standard maze. This ratio does not adequately represent, however, the relative confusion in the two cases because it neglects the greater simplicity of the sideless maze. If the two mazes offered equal opportunity for error, it is safe to assume that the discrepancy MAZE STUDIES WITH THE WHITE RAT 269 between the two sets of values would have been much greater than they were. This difference in complexity can be equated by comparing the initial error record due to rotation with the initial error record in learning. The average error record for the first trial in learning the standard maze was 44, while the average number of errors made in the first rotation test was 10. Rotation in the standard maze produces an initial error distur- bance which is approximately 23 per cent of that in mastering the maze. The initial error record for the sideless maze was 10.5, while the corresponding value for rotation was 19.7 The confusion involved in rotation was thus greater than that in learning. Relative to the number of initial errors in learning, rotation in the sideless maze produces a disturbance eight times as great as in the standard maze. Certain peculiarities of behavior were apparent in the sideless maze. The rats frequently gravitated to that corner at which the food box had been located before the rotation. Failing to find food, they renewed their explorations of the maze, but came back again and again to this particular corner. One animal finally refused to leave this locality and had to be removed from the maze. After two such unsuccessful trials on successive days, the experimenter guided the animal to the new position of the food box, and thereafter the maze was traversed success- fully on the animal's own initiative. One other rat was un- successful on the third trial. This type of behavior was exhibited in varying degrees during the first three trials by each of the ten rats employed in the test. Such behavior has been observed but rarely in a standard maze and only when certain parts of the maze were flooded by strong daylight illumination. 5. The cut de sacs in the standard maze were closed by sliding doors. After learning the maze in this condition, the animals were subjected to the usual rotation tests. Obviously all dis- turbance due to rotation must be measured by return errors. Twelve rats were tested and all were affected. The experiment is significant in indicating that the disturbance in maze rotation is not due exclusively to wrong choices at those critical positions from which several paths diverge. Confusion obtains when no choice is possible and when the animals have had no experience with ad de sacs during learning. Rotation of Maze and Environment. The maze was learned 270 HARVEY CARR while entirely covered by the canvas top and illuminated by an electric light. After learning, both maze and top were rotated as a unit. Tests were given for the three positions on successive days. On the fourth day a normal record was secured for the original position. The above procedure was then repeated several times. Ten rats were utilized in the experiment. In the first shift eight rats were disturbed; these gave an average error record of 1.29 for 48 trials, although errors were present in but 31 per cent of the trials. The shifts were now repeated three times and no tendency toward adapta- tion was in evidence. The percentages of animals affected in the four successive shifts were 80, 80, 90 and 70. The percentages of trials in which error was present were 31, 35, 55, and 36. The error records were 1.29, 1.81, 1.18, and 1.32. The largest disturbance occurred for the 180 degree position. This result is a function of the position and not of the temporal order of the shifts, inasmuch as a different temporal order of the three positions wras given in the successive series. This experiment is comparable with the first test of the previous section in all respects except the environmental condi- tions. In the previous test the maze was rotated in reference to the environment, while here both maze and environment were rotated. Rotation in reference to a stationary environment produced much the greater effect at first, and allowed a pro- nounced degree of adaptation when the experiment was repeated. No adaptation was present when both maze and environment were rotated, and the records secured were practically identical with those in the former experiment after the rats had become adapted. C. Alteration of conditions while learning the maze Rotation of Maze. Animals were required to master the standard maze when its cardinal orientation was changed for each day's test. The daily shifts in position were 90 degrees, each position being repeated every fourth day. These records are compared with those representing the mastery of a stationary maze, and we are able to estimate the relative effect upon learn- ing of a stable vs. a variable relation to the objective environ- ment. The following records for a rotated maze were obtained from ten rats without previous laboratory experience: — the MAZE STUDIES WITH THE WHITE RAT 271 average number of trials involved in mastering the maze was 30, a group error record of zero was first obtained on the 36th trial, and the average number of errors made during learning was 196. The corresponding values for a group of 29 rats learning the same maze while stationary were 18, 22, and 144 respectively. Rotation thus increased these values by 50 per cent. A comparison is likewise possible between two groups of rats which had had previous experience upon a different type of problem. Ten rats in learning a rotated maze mastered it in 21.4 trials, first secured a perfect group record on the 27th trial and averaged 110 errors per rat for the learning period. The corresponding values for 14 rats in mastering the same maze while stationary were 9.2, 17, and 58. In this case rotation has doubled the difficulty of learning. The two curves of learning were similar in form; rotation seems to add on the average about 3 or 4 errors to each trial and this slight addition towards the end operates to postpone the final mastery of the maze for many trials. Uniform Environment. Certain groups of rats mastered the maze when covered on all sides by the canvas top. Other groups also mastered this maze without the top. In one case the maze habit was developed in a uniform optical environment, and in the other with a heterogeneous environment. A com- parison of the two sets of data will thus indicate the function of a heterogeneous environment in the development of a habit. The heterogeneous environment aided learning. The average number of trials and the average number of errors per rat for a group of 29 rats in mastering an open maze were 18 and 144 respectively. The corresponding values for the closed maze were 26 and 282. These results indicate that the animals may utilize data from the objective environment in mastering the maze. CONCLUSIONS Any sensori-motor act can not be regarded as an isolated independent function ; the act was learned within a wider sensory environment, and it never ceases to be wholly free from these conditions either during or after its development. The stability of the environment furthers the development of the act, and conditions the regularity and accuracy of its functioning after it has become automatic. These environmental conditions 272 HARVEY CARR embrace the sensory situation at the time, the sensory situation in which the animal lived for several days prior to the act, as well as the intraorganic condition of the animal. The influence of intraorganic factors is evident from four types of facts: — 1. The case of hunger is obvious. 2. Novel situations while running the ma2e may induce effects which persist and exert a disturbing influence after a return to normal conditions. These persistent disturbing effects must be intraorganic. 3. Alterations of the cage environment previous to the performance of the act may exert a disturbing effect. Evidently these disturbing conditions must be retained as some intraorganic condition. 4. The influence of some of these alterations may be cumulative from day to day. These alterations operate in an irregular and sporadic fashion. This generalization is supported by several lines of evidence. 1. A few animals in each group are usually immune to the altered conditions. In the majority of experiments the percent- age of animals affected ranged from 50 to 90. 2. Animals may be disturbed in one trial but immune in another. The percentage of trials in which error was present ranges from 30 to 65 for the various experiments. On the average the affected animals were not susceptible to the alterations in one-half the tests. 3. An animal may be susceptible to one kind of alteration but immune to another, while the opposite relation will obtain for another rat. Eleven rats were subjected to the following five experiments, — position of experimenter, rotation of cage, position of cage, position of maze, and rotation of maze. Three animals were disturbed in all five experiments, three rats were affected in but four tests, two rats in three tests, two rats in two experi- ments, and one rat in but a single test. Two rats were dis- turbed by the rotation of the maze, but were not affected by a change in the position of the maze; on the other hand, two rats were disturbed by the latter test but were immune to the rotation of the maze. Ten rats were given the following tests, increase of illumination, rotation of maze and environment, cleansing paths, uncovering maze, and rotation of maze. One rat was affected by all tests, three rats were immune to one experiment, four to two experiments, and two to three experi- ments. Three animals were immune to the rotation of the maze and environment, but were disturbed by cleansing the maze; on the other hand two rats were immune to the changes MAZE STUDIES WITH THE WHITE RAT 273 involved in the cleansing of the maze but susceptible to the first experiment. Many similar illustrations can be given. 4. A rat may make a very large number of errors in some tests and very few errors in others. Ten rats were ranked as to the number of errors made in each of five experiments. The rankings given to one rat for the five experiments were 1, 2, 9, 2, and 2. Similar rankings for another animal were 8, 1, 1, 7, and 9. This lack of consistency may be shown by dividing the animals into two groups on the basis of number of errors. Only one of the ten rats belonged to the better half in all five experiments. In another group of eleven rats but four manifested any high degree of consistency; two were found in the better half for all experiments, while two invariably belonged to the poorer half. The rankings for one experiment were correlated with those for the other four experiments, and positive values of .369, .690, .414, and .068 were obtained. 5. Affected animals make a relatively high percentage of perfect runs in one experiment and a low percentage in another. 6. One would naturally expect a high degree of correlation between the total number of errors made in an experiment and the number of trials in which a disturbance was present. Two groups of animals were ranked in both respects for five experiments and the correlation values were computed. Small negative values were obtained in every case. These results mean that those animals which make an extremely large number of errors in one trial are likely to become adapted to the alteration and run the subsequent trials without error. 7. Animals that do well for one position in the experiment on maze rotation do not necessarily make good records for other positions. The correlation value between two positions for a group of nine rats was but .434. Animals that do well for one position do not necessarily make good records when the test for this position is repeated. Such a correlation by the ranking method for the above group of rats gave a value of but .024. The above emphasis upon the irregular and accidental character of the disturbances must not blind one to the fact that some rats manifest a relatively high degree of consistency in the various experiments. Some animals are quite susceptible and make a large number of errors in every experiment. Other rats are prone to immunity; they either fail to be disturbed or 274 HARVEY CAHR make low error scores in every experiment. This consistency is limited to comparatively few animals; irregularity and incon- sistency obtain for the majority of the rats and for the groups taken as a whole. Adaptability to these alterations is the general rule. The rate of adaptability is a function in general of the magnitude of the disturbance. Stability of the novel conditions aids adaptation, while any further change delays it; animals kept in a novel situation eliminate the disturbance more quickly than when they are shifted back and forth between the novel and the normal conditions. Continuous alterations of the novel conditions as in the various rotation experiments operate to delay the adaptation. Adaptation to any novel situation is in the main specific and not general ; the animals become adapted to that particular alteration and not to all novel situations. There is no conclusive evidence that the adaptation secured in one experiment operates to give complete immunity in other experiments. Complete adaptation to one series of positions in the rotation experiment did not involve a complete immunity for alterations between another series of positions. Any adaptation to a particular situation is retained with some degree of perfection over a period of time devoted to securing adjust- ments to other novel conditions. Any acquired immunity is thus mainly specific and refers only to that situation under which it was acquired; it is retained after the interpolation of other tests with some degree of perfection, but it gives no certain aid to the mastery of other novel situations. The degree of disturbance was a function of the kind of alter- ation. As a general rule alterations while running the maze were more effective than changed conditions of the rat's environ- ment before being placed in the maze. It is rather surprising that pronounced changes in method of handling and of route from cage to maze should be without effect, while alterations of the living cage in relation to its environment were provocative of error. The difference in the results may be due to the fact that the animals were not subjected to a sufficient duration of exposure to the novel conditions in the former two experiments. The maximum duration of exposure never exceeded a few minutes, while the minimum exposure in the cage experiments was fifteen minutes. Covering the maze produced no effect, while con- MAZE STUDIES WITH THE WHITE RAT 275 siderable disturbance was manifest when the maze was uncovered. This difference in results is more comprehensible when the situa- tion is stated in the following terms: — The removal of stimuli (change from a heterogeneous to a uniform environment) is without effect, while the introduction of novel stimuli operates as a disturbance. This conception would indicate that the rats after mastering the maze do not rely to any great extent upon the objective stimuli as guides or controls in traversing the maze, and that the introduction of unfamiliar conditions operates as a distraction. This paper makes no pretense of defining in physical terms the nature of the environmental alterations. Rotation of the maze may disturb the normal relation of the animal to the optical, olfactory, or auditory aspects of the environment. Likewise we make no pretense of knowing through what sense avenue these disturbances were mediated. We were interested primarily in establishing the fact that the rats are sensitive to these alterations in some way and that stability of sensory conditions is conducive to the development of an automatic act. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOR Vol. 7 SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER No. 5 MAZE STUDIES WITH THE WHITE RAT II. Blind Animals HARVEY CARR University of Chicago In the previous paper there was formulated the proposition that the maze habit is dependent to some degree upon the sta- bility of various environmental conditions. The present paper concerns the function vision in sensing these alterations and becoming adapted to them. The method consists of comparing the records of blind rats with those of animals with intact sense organs. The possibility of vision was eliminated by the usual method of extirpation of the bulb. Three of the rats were subjected to an autopsy and a microscopical examination by Professor C. J. Herriek, who reports that all three were prob- ably blind. Comparisons will be facilitated by certain classi- fications of the experiments. 1. The first group contains all those experiments in which no blind animals were tested, and hence comparisons are impossible. This group consists of the following experiments. Covering cage, covering maze, increase of illumination, decrease of illumination, rotation of a uniform environment, the second phase of uncov- ering the maze, and the 3rd, 4th, and 5th tests on rotating the maze. 2. The second group contains those experiments in which both seeing and blind animals were utilized but in which no rats were disturbed by the alterations. Obviously these experiments can furnish no data as to the function of vision. Nine blinds 277 278 HARVEY CARR were subjected to the ' variable route ' test and none were affected. Five blinds were tested on variations of method of handling without disturbing results. Two blinds were sub- jected to the first test on uncovering the maze and no effect was noticeable. 3. In the third class 'fall those experiments in which both blind and seeing rats were tested, but in which the disturbance was limited to those animals with vision. Alterations in the position of the experimenter affected none of the five blind animals tested, while every member of a group of six normal rats was disturbed. A change in the position of the maze had no effect upon any member of a group of five blind animals. In a group of six normal rats, four were affected and these made an average error record of 2.08. 4. In the remaining experiments, both blind and normal animals were tested and both groups were disturbed. The comparative records will need to be stated in detail for each experiment. Degree of Hunger. Two blind rats were compared with ten normals. All members of both groups were disturbed. The blinds made errors the more frequently; the percentages of trials with error being 42 and 34 respectively for the blind and visual groups. The average error records for the two groups were 9.75 and 2.38 for the blinds and normals respectively. The blinds manifested their maximum of disturbance on the third trial while the normals gave the largest error record on the fifth trial. The blinds also exhibited the greater error record on a return to normal conditions. Cleansing Maze. Seven blinds were compared with ten nor- mals. Fewer blinds were affected, the percentages being 57 and 80. They made errors in 75% of their trials as compared with 61% for the normals. Their average error record was 6.00 as compared with 1.70 for the normals. Their greatest disturbance occurred on the first trial while the normals made their poorest record on the second trial. The time necessary to effect an adaptation was the same for the two groups. The blind animals exhibited the greater range of variability as to number of errors per rat; the average and the average varia- tion for the blinds were 24.0 and 18.6 respectively, while the MAZE STUDIES WITH WHITE RAT 279 corresponding values for the normals were 10 and 5.6. The average variation relative to the size of the errors is thus much greater for the blind group. Position of Cage. — Both groups contained ten rats. A smaller percentage of the blinds was affected, the values being 40 and 70. Those blinds affected were disturbed in a greater percentage of their trials (50 vs. 41), and made the greater average error score (1.33 vs. .87). The blind animals require a longer dura- tion of exposure to induce an effect; they were disturbed only for the 24-hr. exposures, while the normals were affected by a 15-min. exposure. The blind rats also possessed the poorer adaptive power, for the normals became so accustomed to the novel situation in 24 hours that a disturbance was no longer manifest. Rotation of Maze-. Two blinds were tested on the first type of ma^e rotation, in which the three positions were tested on successive days. Their records are to be compared with those of ten normals. All members of both groups were disturbed. The blinds made errors in a greater percentage of their trials (67 vs. 65), but their average error record was much smaller (3.33 vs. 6.95). With a repetition of the test the poorer adap- tive ability was manifested by the animals without vision; they decreased the percentage of trials in which error was present from 67 to 5&, and their error record from 3.33 to 2.50. The visual group on the contrary reduced their error record from 6.95 to 1.72 and the percentage of runs with error from 65 to 47. Rotation of Heterogeneous Maze Environment. The records of fourteen blind animals are to be compared with those of seven normal rats,. A greater percentage of blind rats was disturbed (78 vs. 71). The errors of the blind group were confined to a smaller percentage of the trials (38 vs. S3). The blinds gave the larger error score (2.32 vs. 1;90) in spite of the fact that the errors were limited to fewer trials. The discrepancy is much greater when we compare the total number of errors per rat (18 vs. 12). The blinds exhibited the greater range of variability as to number of errors per rat; for the blinds the errors ranged from 3 to 70 with a mean variation of 15. The range for the normals was 9 to 15 with a mean variation of 2.2. The normal rats appeared to react definitely to the altered conditions. With each new change of conditions the errors were 280 HARVEY CARR made at those places in the maze where the lighting conditions were altered the most. The blind animals, on the contrary, gave no evidence of reacting specifically to any observable changes. The errors were likely to occur anywhere within the maze. When the experiment was first performed, a group of four blinds was employed mainly as a control as no disturb- ance was expected. Since the number of errors was increased beyond the normal records, the test was repeated upon two other groups of blinds consisting of five each. The same results were obtained; the rats did not seem to be reacting to any specific feature in the environment and yet the normal number of errors was increased; some rats occasionally became almost hopelessly confused. Five animals made over 17 errors in a single trial. Rotation of Maze and Environment. The records of five blinds are to be compared with those of ten normals. Eighty per cent of each group was disturbed. The blind animals made errors the more frequently, the percentage of runs with error being 42 and 3 1 . The average error records of the blinds and normals were 7.76 and 1.29 respectively. The blinds exhibited the greater range of individual variability; the individual number of errors ranged between 3 and 172 for the blind rats and be- tween 2 and 22 for the normals. The test was not repeated for the blinds so that comparisons as to adaptability are impos- sible. The blind rats, however, exhibited more disturbance after a return to normal conditions. Rotation of Cage. Nine blind rats were tested. For the 15-min. exposure, all were affected, errors were present in 57% of the trials, and the average error record was 1.90. For the 24-hr. exposure, 90% were disturbed, errors were present in 62% of the trials, and the average error record was 4.95. A repeti- tion of the tests disclosed no tendency toward adaptation. Blind rats are more susceptible to these alterations than are the normals; blinds were disturbed by the 15-min. exposure while the normals were not. The blinds were also affected more by the 24-hr. shifts than were animals with vision. The blinds exhibited the greater range of individual variability as to num- ber of errors, and the lesser powers of adaptability. 5. We are also able to compare the records of blind and normal animals in the mastery of the maze problem. Vision aids untrained rats in learning a stationary maze, MAZE STUDIES WITH WHITE RAT 281 decreasing the number of trials by 28% and the total number of errors by 27%. The following records were obtained for 19 blind animals. The average number of trials involved in learning was 25. A perfect record was secured for the various groups on the 30th trial. An average total of 229 errors was made by each rat. The corresponding values for 27 normal animals were 18, 22, and 144. The generalization that vision may aid in the mastery of a stationary maze contradicts the findings of Watson in his study of kinaesthetic sensitivity. I do not question these results but doubt their universality. In these experiments the records of many blind rats and the average, records of many groups of blind animals do not suffer in a com- parison with the records of normal animals. One of the blind rats mastered the maze more quickly than any of the 27 normals. Two of the blind groups gave as good records as those of three groups of normals. On the other hand, six of the nineteen blinds did worse than the poorest of the 27 normals, and two groups of blinds gave a higher average record than the poorest group among the normals. While some individuals and some groups of blind animals do as well or better than the average run of the normal animals, yet there are many blind rats that do considerably worse than the majority of the normals. When the groups compared are rather large, there is likely to be a number of blind rats with extremely poor records and these cases are responsible for the poor group average. The blind rats exhibit the greater range of individual variability in their capacity to learn. Vision aids trained rats to learn the rotated maze, decreasing the values by 35-40%. A group of 10 normals learned the rotated maze in 21.5 trials with an average total error score of 110. The corresponding values for three blind animals were 33.3 and 190. The rats had previously been trained on an alternation problem. The size of the blind group is too small, however, for a confident conclusion. Vision is a detriment with untrained rats in mastering a rotated maze, increasing both number of trials and total errors. A group of six blinds learned the maze in 27 trials with an aver- age error score of 117. The corresponding values for 10 normal rats were 30 and 196. 6. There are certain other peculiarities of blind rats con- 282 HARVEY CARR nected with their greater variability and erraticness. Blind rats are rather difficult to keep in good physical condition. They are more inclined to sluggishness in behavior, their appe- tite is frequently diminished, their hair becomes dry and rough, and they are sometimes rather flabby and cold to the touch. I have also noted what may be termed as a " breakdown," of which a number of examples may be cited. A group of six nor- mals had been employed for four months in a sound discrimi- nation experiment. Their conduct was normal and their physi- cal condition was excellent at the conclusion of the experiment. These animals were now blinded and given the maze problem. Four of these rats proceeded to learn the maze in a normal manner for a number of trials and then suffered the ' break- down." They made complete failures of their attempts, became exhausted before success was achieved, and finally refused to run when placed in the maze. The break came on suddenly and occurred between the 6th and the 15th trials, — after the maze had been pretty well mastered. In another group of four animals without previous experience, one rat made rapid prog- ress up to the 12th trial and then refused to run. The break- down may occur at almost any stage of the experimentation. I had one individual that refused to run in the first trial. Another rat broke down on the 142nd trial during the control tests, — long after the maze had been mastered. Sometimes the rats simply quit and refuse to work further. Others work indus- triously but fail to find the food box, and are finally forced to cease their efforts through exhaustion; this behavior may be repeated in a number of successive trials until the rat quits and refuses to work when placed in the maze. Recovery from these breakdowns is rare and the rats may as well be eliminated from the experiment. I have tested such rats for a number of days in succession, and once a week for a couple of months in the hope that an interval of rest would induce recovery. These animals may continue to live and enjoy the average of health for blind rats. Some have been kept in the laboratory for five to six months. I have had some females bear and rear young subsequent to the breakdown. The phenomenon needs extended and systematic study. The above differences in the comparative data obviously must be explained and interpreted in terms of vision. Certain con- MAZE STUDIES WITH WHITE RAT 283 elusions can be asserted with confidence. Some interpretations must be regarded as suggestive. Vision has a sensitive function. This statement means that the various objective alterations sometimes affected the animal's behavior through the medium of vision; in ordinary language we would say that the changes were perceived through the eye. The sensitivity of the eye is sufficiently proven by the third class of experiments in which the disturbances were limited to those animals with vision. Obviously these alterations were sensed wholly through the eye. Most of these alterations may be sensed entirely through some other sense avenue than vision. The novel sensory con- ditions in the hunger experiment were obviously intraorganic in character. Vision can hardly be concerned in a sensitive way. In most of the experiments, the blind animals were affected; these blind animals must have sensed the novel con- ditions by means of other sense avenues than vision. The normal animals probably utilized both of the above sensory means in reacting to the novel features in the fourth class of experiments. They possess both sensory capacities. The alteration can be perceived thrbugh this other sense modal- ity since the blinds were affected. The alterations certainly possessed optical features. The differential sensitivity of blind and normal rats indicates that these changes were sensed wholly or in part through vision. The normal rats exhibited the greater degree of susceptibility or sensitivity to the alterations. The percentage of animals affected among the normals was equal to or greater than that for the blind rats with the exception of one experiment, — rotation of the cage. Obviously, this excep- tion can not be explained on the hypothesis that the blind rats possessed modes of sensitivity not belonging to normal animals : it can be explained, however, in terms of principles to be de- veloped later. Vision possesses a corrective and adaptive function. The presence of eyes in some way increases the ability of the animal to adapt to these changes. Normal animals resist and over- came the disturbances better than do the blinds. The effect of this function is found in the greater rapidity of adaptation, a smaller error record, and a larger percentage of perfect runs. The best illustration of the operation of this function is found 284 HARVEY CARR in the hunger experiment. Both groups of animals reacted to these alterations through a common mode of sensitivity and the percentage affected was the same for both groups. Vision, how- ever, operated to minimize and overcome the effects of the disturbing conditions. The normal animals were able to make more perfect runs; they were able to resist the distracting in- fluences more frequently than the blind rats. When disturb- ances did occur, the normal animals made by far the fewer errors; vision decreased the number of errors. Animals with vision exhibited the greater tendency to adapt themselves to these novel situations; they also recuperated from the effects more quickly after a return to normal conditions. Comparing the records of the two groups in the various experiments of the fourth class, we find that the adaptive and recuperative power of the normals is equal to or greater than that of the blind ani- mals in every case. The normal animals made a greater per- centage of perfect runs with the exception of one experiment; evidently they are more able to resist the distractive conditions. Rats with vision gave the smaller error score in every experiment but one; they thus possess the power of minimizing the disturb- ance when it occurs. When comparisons are possible as to the correlation between the maximum disturbance and the dura- tion of exposure to the novel conditions, we find that the normal animals are the more resistant in three of four cases. The blind rats invariably exhibit the greater variability as to the range of errors. Blind rats are extremely variable as to num- ber of errors; they are more likely to go to pieces, become lost and run high error scores when they are disturbed; this fact would indicate that vision operates as a corrective and control. The discrepancies and exceptions in the application of the above two principles of explanation become explicable when we consider that the two functions of sensitivity and adaptation are antagonistic in their effects. The greater the sensitivity the larger will be the number of animals affected, the percentage of runs with error, and the total number of errors. The corrective function will operate to decrease the number of errors and the percentage of runs with error; it might also decrease the number of animals susceptible to the disturbing changes. The two func- tions, although antagonistic in their effects, are not necessarily mutually exclusive; both may conceivably operate at the same MAZE STUDIES WITH WHITE RAT 285 time. The actual records secured in any experiment will thus be a function of the relative strength of the two tendencies. In one type of situation the sensitive function may be the more effective in determining the character of the records, while the adaptive function may be the more efficacious in another experi- mental situation. The two experiments which deviated from the usual rule were rotation of maze and rotation of cage. The average error score of the normals was less than that of the blinds with the exception of the maze rotation experiment. We have here a rotation in reference to a predominantly optical situation, and one would expect that the sensitive function of the eye would predominate in effectiveness; the disturbance is so great that the corrective effects are not sufficient to reduce the error record below that of the blind animals. When the test was repeated, we find that the normal groups made the greater adaptive progress, and reduced their error score below that of the blinds. When the corrective function is given time to become efficacious, the error records no longer constitute an exception to the rule. When the cage was rotated, normal animals were not affected by a 15-min. exposure, while the blind rats were. We may explain this difference in susceptibility on the hypothesis that the corrective function of vision enabled the normal animals to resist the disturbing effects of the new con- ditions. With a 24-hr. exposure both groups wejre affected, but the blinds manifested the greater disturbance and the normals exhibited the greater tendency toward adaptation. The normal rats thus were no longer able to resist the cumulative effects of a prolonged exposure, but the corrective function of vision enabled them to reduce the degree of the disturbance and hasten adaptation. The corrective and sensitive functions of vision are also evi- dent from a comparison of the records of normal rats in the different experiments. When the maze was rotated in reference to a stationary heterogeneous environment, the normal animals were exceedingly disturbed but they made marked progress in adaptation when the test was repeated. A rotation of the maze and a uniform optical environment gave a lesser degree of disturbance and no tendency toward adaptation. The dif- ference in the two alterations was presumably optical in the main. The greater the optical changes, the greater was the 286 HARVEY CARR sensitivity and the adaptive power of the animals. likewise, when normal rats were rotated in an open and a covered cage, the greater sensitivity was manifested in the former case. Many similar illustrations can be given. The terms ' ' sensitive ' ' and ' corrective ' have so far been used in a purely descriptive sense, to state certain differences of fact. As explanatory concepts they render but little service. In attempting to explain the greater sensitivity of the normal rats to all alterations instituted after the mastery of the maze, two possibilities exist; these functions of vision we may term ' directive ' ' and ' ' distractive. ' ' The first hypothesis assumes that the motor activity of the animal is guided and directed in part by the visual impulses released by the stimuli from the obiective environment. When the relation between the rat and these features of the environment is altered, motor disturbances are the inevitable result. It is possible that this directive function of vision may be present during the mastery of the maze but absent after the act has been thoroughly developed. The distractive hypothesis assumes that the maze habit is in- fluenced in no way by the visual environment so long as it remains stable. Any pronounced alteration, however, is sensed immediately and operates as a distractive stimulus; in common parlance, it attracts the animal's attention, the rat reacts to the new conditions, and as a consequence the maze habit is disrupted. These two functions are not necessarily mutually exclusive; it is possible that both may be efficacious in mediat- ing the disturbance in any run through the maze. Between the two explanatory conceptions, we are forced to conclude in favor of the distraction hypothesis as far as the normal animals are concerned. When the position of the ex- perimenter was altered, the rats were never disturbed in that section of the maze near which the experimenter had been standing. In fact the animals were not disturbed at any posi- tion in the maze at which they were oriented towards the old position of the experimenter. This fact would indicate that the rats did not employ visual stimuli from this source in any effective fashion in directing and orienting their conduct in the maze. The disturbance did occur, however, in those sections of the maze near the new position of the experimenter and when the rats were oriented in his direction. When the animals MAZE STUDIES WITH WHITE RAT 287 left the true pathway, they invariably ran towards the experi- menter. This positive reaction can not be considered a direc- tive habit acquired in learning the maze because the conformation of the maze at the old position was such as to prevent it. The positive reaction can better be regarded as a feeding habit de- veloped in the living cage and on the feeding table. The ex- perimenter thus attracted the animal's attention because of the novelty of the position and stimulated an old habit acquired while the rat was being handled and fed. The arousal of this habit naturally disrupted the normal functioning of the maze act. In several experiments such as increasing and decreasing the illumination, rotating the maze in darkened and lighted environments, and rotating a heterogeneous environment, the following behavior was frequently noted: Animals suffered a pronounced disturbance at those points where the illumination had been greatly increased. I have frequently seen animals run the maze without error up to a point where an alley, customarily darkened, was flooded with a beam of strong daylight. Here the rat stopped suddenly, exhibited strong signs of nervousness and timidity with frequent retracing in search of another path. Decreasing the illumination in any part of the ma7e seemed to be without effect, but a pronounced increase was effective. These facts indicate that the alterations served as distractions. The distractive theory is further supported by the irregular and occasional character of the disturbances. This feature of the results was summarized in the first paper. It refers to such facts that many trials are without error, that rats are immune in one experiment and susceptible in another, and that the number of errors made in various trials is extremely variable. If the rats are relying upon the objective data to guide their conduct in the maze, it would seem that any rat should be disturbed in every trial until complete adaptation is secured. The fact that the disturbances occur in a perfectly haphazard and accidental manner is readily interpreted on the basis of the distractive theory. The disturbance is present only when the alterations attract the attention of the rat, and this result is largely a matter of chance. Conclusive proof of the distrac- tive function is obtained from the comparative records on cover- ing and uncovering the maze. Rats learned the uncovered maze, — a maze with a well lighted and heterogeneous optical 288 HARVEY CARR environment. The maze is now covered with the canvas top. A uniform but darkened environment is substituted for that present while the maze was mastered. If the rat is relying upon these visual objects as directive stimuli in threading the maze, their sudden removal should disrupt the act. No animals were disturbed in this test, and we are forced to conclude that vision possessed no directive function after the maze was mas- tered. We may also assume that the alteration did not operate as a distraction because the new environment was homogeneous and poorly lighted. In the opposite experiment of uncovering the maze, we may conclude that vision of the extraneous en- vironment possessed no directive function because the condi- tions were such that no possibilities were present for its de- velopment. The maze was mastered in a homogeneous optical environment. Removal of the top and the introduction of a well illumined and heterogeneous environment resulted in dis- turbances. Evidently these novel conditions were effective only as distractions. If we cpuld generalize from these experiments, we would be forced to conclude that all disturbances due to alterations after the maze is learned and while the rat is run- ning are the result of distractions. There is but one possible exception to the above formula- tion,— certain characteristics of behavior when the sideless maze was rotated. After rotation the animals frequently drifted to that corner at which the food box had formerly been located. This fact would indicate that the rats can orient themselves in reference to the position of the food box in terms of stimuli emanating from the extraneous environment. The same be- havior was occasionally noted in the rotation of the standard maze when the extraneous environment near the food box pos- sessed unusual features, as an open window giving good light. Granted that this fact indicates a directive function, yet it is by no means certain that it was mediated through vision rather than smell or some other sense, for no blind animals were em- ployed as controls in this experiment. The fact can be inter- preted, however, in terms of the distractive function. It is pos- sible that certain unusual features in the environment near the position of the food box operated as a distractive stimulus and that the rats reacted to it in a positive manner. We may then safelv conclude that alterations instituted after the maze is MAZE STUDIES WITH WHITE RAT 289 mastered and while it is being run may and do operate as dis- tractive stimuli in so far as they are sensed through vision; it is also possible that certain alterations may disturb the animal because these stimuli had been utilized as guides in running the maze, but no affirmative statements can be made with confidence. Blind animals were also disturbed and this disturbance was mediated through other senses than vision; we must also assume that normal animals were disturbed in part through other modali- ties of sense than vision. This disturbance may also be explained by the assumption that these other senses were susceptible to the altered conditions either as distractions or as motor con- trols. There are no facts which support the directive hypoth- esis in a conclusive fashion. Certain facts can hardly be interpreted in other than distractive terms. The effect of vary- ing the degree of hunger is obvious. The haphazard and occa- sional character of the disturbance was more characteristic of the behavior of the blind than of the normal animals, and this fact is best explained by the distractive hypothesis. The differ- ential sensitivity of the normal and blind rats is thus one of degree and not of kind. Normal animals manifest the greater degree of susceptibility to the changes because they are affected through more sensory avenues. The comparative learning records of the various groups of animals furnish certain data relative to the function of vision. 1. Normal rats master a stationary maze more readily than a rotated maze, and an open maze quicker than a covered one. These facts can be explained in terms of either the distractive or directive hypotheses. If the animal can utilize objective stimuli as guides or controls, the presence and stability of an optical environment should facilitate the learning process. Like- wise these objective stimuli may function merely to attract the animal's attention, encourage unnecessary and disadvantageous excursions, and otherwise distract the animal from the more serious business at hand. On this hypothesis a changing en- vironment would operate as a more effective distractor than a stationary one. Likewise, the distractive effect of a heteroge- neous environment would be greater than that of a uniform one. 2. Rats with vision learn a stationary maze more easily than do blind animals. This poorer learning capacity of blind rats may be explained in numerous ways: a. We may assume that 290 HARVEY CARR the normal animals learn to utilize visual stimuli as controls in selecting the true path from the numerous cul de sacs. b. Vision may be advantageous because of the tonic effect of light. Visual stimuli exert a tonic and stimulative effect upon the various activities of the organism. Rats with vision exhibit the greater vigor and superabundance of bodily activity. Surplus activity is necessarily valuable in any trial and error mode of learning. This effect of light will also be manifested by the vital activities. Heightened vitality will be influential via of an increased reten- tive capacity or a stronger hunger motive. Decreased activity and vitality resulting from loss of vision may interact upon each other; decreased activity, or lack of exercise, will lower the vital tonus of the organism, and this lowered vitality will in turn produce sluggishness of behavior, c. We may assume that the learning capacity of blind rats has been minimized by cer- tain deleterious effects of the operation per ser The connection between these effects and learning capacity may be conceived in several ways. The operation (the surgical shock or the effect of the ether) may act directly upon the vital activities and thus influence learning capacity as sketched above. The organic aftereffects may be conceived as some sort of a nervous irritant which operates as a distractive stimulus and thus produces erratic and exaggerated behavior. Likewise the effects may be nervous modifications of such a character as to render the animal more susceptible than usual to any novel stimulative conditions. The animal is thus prone to erratic, irregular and exaggerated modes of response detrimental to the mastery of the maze. On this hypothesis, stability and instability will characterize normal and blind rats respectively. The last two hypotheses are supported by several lines of evidence. Blind rats frequently exhibit signs of decreased vitality such as muscular flabbiness, rough coats, poor circula- tion, poor appetite, and a susceptibility to disease. Blind animals are also less active as a general rule; the normal vigor, persistence, and superabundance of activity is frequently lack- ing. The phenomenon of breakdowns characteristic of blind rats also suggests the validity of the third conception. The greater erraticness and variability of blind animals, — the ten- dency to make now and then unusually large error scores, is explicable in terms of the third conception. There are no facts MAZE STUDIES WITH WHITE RAT 291 which directly support the first conception of a directive func- tion of vision. 3. Vision is a detriment to the mastery of the rotated maze when untrained animals are utilized. This fact cannot be ex- plained on the assumption that rotation is detrimental because visual-motor habits are continually being disrupted, because rotation will prevent the development of any such visual habits. Only one possibility remains, — the assumption that these visual alterations operate as distractions. 4. Vision is an advantage in the mastery of the maze, when the rats have had previous experience on other problems. The paucity of data upon which this conclusion, is based renders its validity questionable. Accepting the fact at its face value, we may assume that the previous experience of the normal animals has operated to render them less dependent upon the extraneous environment; this result will minimize their susceptibility to the distractive influences of the rotation as demanded by the con- clusion of the previous paragraph. The two groups thus approx- imate equality as to susceptibility to the distractions due to rotation, and the visual group is now enabled to master the maze more readily in virtue of its greater learning capacity. All comparative data on the mastery of the maze can thus be explained on the assumption that vision possesses both detri- mental and beneficial features in relation to the mastery of a maze problem. Visual stimuli tend to distract the animal and thus retard the development of the kinaesthetic-motor habit. The existence of vision on the other hand increases learning capacity. Two conceptions of the relation between vision and learning capacity receive some factual support. Light exerts a tonic and stimulative effect upon activity, while on the other hand the removal of the eye balls is to be regarded as some sort of a positive disturbing or distracting factor. As to the nature of the process of adaptation, certain explan- atory conceptions may be suggested. 1. We may suppose that the alterations disrupt the system of sensori-motor connections involved in running the maze, and that adaptation is to be conceived as a process of reorganization, — -the acquisition of new motor controls. This conception assumes a directive function for the senses involved. Animals with vision have an advantage because they can utilize visual as well as other sensory cues. 292 HARVEY CARR 2. The distractions and resulting errors induce confusion and excitement, and this confusion may now operate as a further distraction. Adaptation is a process of minimizing and allay- ing this excitement, and all familiar or unaltered stimuli will possess this quieting and reassuring characteristic. Adaptation is a matter of learning to direct the attention to the familiar aspects of the environment. Rats with vision will have an advantage because of their greater learning capacity and their greater sensory contact with the environment. 3. The disturb- ances are due to distracting stimuli, and adaptation is a pro- cess of strengthening the maze habit up to a point where it is immune to the distractive effects of those particular stimuli. Adaptation is thus a further process of learning, and those ani- mals with the greater learning capacity will manifest the greater adaptive power. On this assumption the adaptive capacity of normal rats will be greater than that belonging to blind animals. 4. Blind rats are less resistant to distractions because of the operative effects. As previously noted, these effects may be conceived as intraorganic distractive stimuli of some sort, or as nervous conditions conducing to exaggerated and erratic re- sponses. Blind rats will be regarded as essentially unstable organisms, subnormal in their capacity of resisting distracting stimuli. 5. Adaptation may be conceived as a process of de- creasing sensory susceptibility to stimuli due to neural or end organ changes somewhat akin to fatigue. On this hypothesis any end organ can adapt only to those alterations which were sensed by that receptor. The factual data are insufficient for any very confident judg- ments as to the relative validity of these various hypotheses. The normal animals manifested by far the greater adaptive power; this fact is readily explicable in terms of any one of the first four conceptions. The difference of adaptive capacity of the two groups is generally greater than their differences in learning ability as manifested in the mastery of the maze; this fact militates against the 1st and 3rd conceptions as complete explanations of adaptation. The first conception must be sum- marily dismissed as the facts indicate rather conclusively that extraneous stimuli do not function as motor controls after the maze is mastered. The greater variability of the blind rats may be explained on the basis of either the 2nd or the 4th hy- potheses. The immunity to distractions due to adaptation is MAZE STUDIES WITH WHITE RAT 293 mainly specific rather than general; this fact eliminates the 3rd hypothesis as a complete explanation of the process, since rats in time should become practically immune to all ordinary distractions. Neither can the fact be readily envisaged under the 4th and 5th conceptions ; it is most easily explicable in terms of the 2nd hypothesis. A sense organ can play a part in the process of adaptation although the disturbance was mediated through some other sense avenue. Normal rats displayed the greater adaptive power in the hunger experiment, so that vision must have been concerned in the process although the disturb- ing conditions were intraorganic. This fact would eliminate the 5th conception as a complete explanation of adaptation. The maximum adaptive power of normal rats was manifested in those experiments in which the optical features of the en- vironment were altered. Adaptation was very rapid when either the maze or the environment was rotated in reference to each other, but no adaptation was present when both maze and environment were rotated simultaneously. This fact may be conceived in either of two ways: 1. We may assume that the eye can adapt only for visual distractions. This assumption naturally suggests the 5th conception. 2. We may assume the truth of the 2nd conception, and explain the inability of the normal rats to adapt to the rotation of maze and environment as due to the homogeneity of the visual environment in this experiment. These conceptions are not mutually exclusive; all may con- tribute to the process of adaptation. Only the first possibility must be summarily dismissed. The second conception receives the most support, as there are no facts which can not be ex- plained in its terms. The 3rd conception meets the greatest amount of difficulty; it can not account for the entire process of adaptation. The evidence for and against the 5th hypothesis is about equally balanced. CONCLUSIONS The white rat is sensitive to optical stimuli through the me dium of the eye. Both advantages and disadvantages accrue from the posses- sion of visual receptors in the maze situation. 294 HARVEY CARR Vision is detrimental because of the abstractive effect of retinal stimuli. The advantageous features of vision may be explained in either of two ways: Retinal stimuli exert a tonic and stimula- tive effect upon organic activities and thus promote learning capacity, or one may assume that blind animals are at a dis- advantage because of certain deleterious effects of the operation. Vision may possess other functions in the maze situation; our facts are inconclusive on many points. These conclusions apply merely to the situations obtaining in our experiments; other potentialities of vision may be realized in different types of situation. MAZE STUDIES WITH THE WHITE RAT III. Anosmic Animals HARVEY CARR University of Chicago Anosmic animals were employed to determine the function of olfaction in the environmental alterations described in the first paper. Records were secured from nine anosmic and five blind and anosmic rats. For these animals I am indebted to Miss Vincent. Professor Herri ck made a histological examina- tion of a group of seven of these defective rats. He reported that the operation was successful for two of the anosmic animals and for but one of the five blind and anosmics. From this record it is obvious that no conclusions drawn from the records of defective animals can be trusted without a subsequent histo- logical examination. In our comparisons we shall utilize the data from the three animals of whose defective condition we are certain. Any conclusions from such a small group must necessarily be regarded with suspicion; however, we shall state the facts as they are and indicate their significance. ANOSMIC ANIMALS The anosmic operation exhibited no apparent deleterious effect upon the vitality of the animals. These animals were kept in the laboratory for nearly a }^ear. Their appetite was undiminished; they looked sleek and well groomed, and the vigor and abundance of their activity was equal to that of normal animals. One of the anosmic animals mastered the standard maze in two trials with a total error score of 40. The other rat required 21 trials and 127 errors to master the same maze. The average values for a group of 27 normal rats in mastering this maze were 18 trials and 144 errors. Evidently smell is not essential to the mastery of this type of maze. In this connection the construction of this maze must be considered; it was nearly water-tight and covered with closely fitting glass covers. Any 295 296 HARVEY CARR olfactory contact with the extraneous environment must have been greatly minimized. In the cleanliness test a single error was made by one animal in the first trial. A pronounced disturbance was manifested by members of the normal and blind groups of animals. Pre- sumably, the alterations in this experiment were primarily olfac- tory in character. The facts indicate that these novel disturb- ing conditions are sensed wholly or mainly by means of smell. The maze was learned with one side of the top open. This top was now removed. No disturbance resulted ; neither were normal animals affected. Both animals were affected by the rotation of the heteroge- neous environment. Their average error record was 2.50 and errors were present in 75% of the trials. The disturbing effect was practically eliminated when the test was repeated. The average error score per rat for the first test was 15. These results are similar to those obtained for normal animals. Both animals were slightly disturbed when both maze and environment were rotated. The average error record was but .42 and the errors were confined to one-third of the trials. The adaptive capacity of this group was not tested. These results are similar to those for normal animals with the exception of a smaller error score. Taken at their face value, the facts indicate that anosmic animals are less sensitive to these changes than are normal or blind rats. Rotation of the uncovered maze disturbed both animals. Their error record for the first test was 5.08, and the disturbance was present in 83% of the trials. A repetition of the test reduced the above values to 1.00 and 60% respectively. For the first test the normal records were 6.95 and 65%, while the correspond- ing values for the second test were 1.72 and 47%. These results indicate that anosmic animals are slightly less sensitive to these changes than are normal rats. Variations in the position of the living cage exerted a pro- nounced disturbance with one rat and a slight disturbance with the other. The average error record was 5.00 and errors were present in 75% of the trials. These rats were subjected to a 24-hr. exposure before being tested. The results indicate a greater susceptibility than that of either blind or normal animals ; a corrective function must be ascribed to olfaction in this case. MAZE STUDIES WITH WHITE RAT 297 The cage was first rotated for the three new positions on successive days. No disturbance was manifested. Both blinds and normals were disturbed in similar conditions. This fact would indicate a sensitive function for olfaction. The rats were now left in each new position for five days and tested daily. No effect was observable for the first position. In the second posi- tion both rats manifested considerable hesitancy and indecision in nearly every run and one rat made eleven errors in one trial. The hesitancy and indecision were again apparent for the third position; one rat made fourteen errors in two trials, and the other eleven errors in one trial. Prolonged exposure thus in- duces a disturbance. The fact again indicates a defective sen- sitivity on the part of these rats. These two anosmic rats belonged to a group of three animals, one of which died before the series of tests were completed. The record of this rat which was not histologically examined was similar in every respect to those giv^en above. A group of six anosmics were subjected to several tests on the sideless maze in the early part of the experimentation; these were not examined. Their results, however, were similar to those two which are known to be anosmict The degree of dis- turbance was practically identical with that for normal rats in the following experiments, — position of experimenter, posi- tion of maze, and rotation of maze. They exhibited little evi- dence of any disturbance when the cage was rotated or altered in position. BLIND AND ANOSMIC ANIMALS Five such animals were tested and afterwards examined. All were pronounced blind. The anosmic operation was completely successful in but one case. Both olfactory bulbs were intact with one animal; evidently the bulbulous material in front of the olfactory lobes had been removed in this animal. With two animals the left lobe had been successfully removed while the right lobe remained intact or partly severed. In the re- maining animal the sections were made through the frontal lobes of the cerebral hemisphere; on one side the section was sufficient to destroy olfaction; on the other olfactory connec- tions were still possible. This group of rats thus consists of one blind, one blind and anosmic, two blind and partially anosmic, 298 HARVEY CARR and one which we may term a defective because of the loss of considerable cerebral tissue. The learning records of this group of animals present many interesting features. The blind animal mastered the maze in 24 trials with a total error score of 152. After this time, the rat ran the maze consistently without error. This record is > similar to those for blind and normal animals. Those two that were blind, and anosmic on the left side gave poorer records; one required 52 trials and 144 errors, and the second 102 trials and 508 errors. After the maze was mastered according to the criterion used, many errors kept appearing in an irregular man- ner for 25 to 40 trials. The blind and anosmic animal did still poorer; it required 130 trials and 2582 errors to learn this maze, but the act did not become thoroughly automatic until the 200th trial. It was also necessary to help this rat in 76 trials while learning the maze. In the early trials this animal utterly failed to reach the food box after several hours of effort and an error score of over 100. After the animal became exhausted I would stimulate it to further efforts and guide it when necessary. After the twentieth run I aided the rat whenever it became apparent that it was hopelessly lost. The defective rat required 194 trials and 1855 errors to master the maze. It was also helped in 32 of its trials. The act did not become thoroughly automatized for some time after the maze was considered learned. These results are significant because the difficulty of mastery is proportional to the degree of olfactory deficiency. The loss of either smell or vision does not operate as a detriment to the mastery of the maze; the loss of vision together with the partial or total destruction of smell is exceedingly detrimental. Evidently the deficiency due to the absence of either vision or smell is com- pensated in some manner by the other sense, while the remaining senses are unable to compensate for the deficiencies of both. Rotation of the heterogeneous environment produced little dis- turbance upon the blind and anosmic or upon those which were blind and partially anosmic. The average error records for six trials were .33 and .66 respectively. The error record of the defective animal was 2.33. The normals gave a score of 1.90, the blinds 2.32, and the anosmics 2.50. Evidently the loss of both senses minimizes or practically abolishes the rat's sensitivity to these changes. MAZE STUDIES WITH WHITE RA*T 299 Uncovering the maze produced no effect. Neither was a dis- turbance manifested by the normals or the anosmics. In the cleanliness test the blind and anosmic made 14 errors in one of its trials. Those which were blind and partially anos- mic gave an error record of .50. These animals exhibited about the same degree of sensitivity as the anosmics. Their sensi- tivity was much less than that of either the normals or blinds; Only one blind and partially anosmic animal was subjected to a rotation of maze and environment; its error record for six trials was 4.16, which is greater than those for normals or anos- mics, but less than that for the blind rats. The blind and anosmic was not affected by a rotation of the maze. A blind and partially anosmic rat gave an error score of 2.50, which is less than that for either anosmics, normals or blinds. The blind and anosmic animal was not affected by changes in the position of the maze. The two which were blind and partially anosmic gave an error record of .75 which is less than that for an}^ of the other sensory groups. The blind and anosmic rat was disturbed by a rotation of the cage only after a considerable period of exposure to the novel situation. Errors were present in three of fourteen trials. The average error record was .78. The degree of sensitivity was about the same as that for the anosmics. The two blind and partially anosmic animals were more susceptible; their error record was 1.68 for eighteen trials. These animals were dis- turbed less than either the blind or normal groups. A significant feature of these results is the practical insen- sitivity of the blind and anosmic rat to all alterations instituted after the mastery of the maze. A total of 50 trials was given, of which 80% were without error. The average error record for the 50 trials was 1.50. In the previous 50 runs, errors were absent in but 59% of the trials and the average error record was 2.70. This animal made a better record during the tests than during the later stages of increasing automaticity and after the maze was considered mastered. No errors were present 'in the first four experiments involving a total of 24 trials. • The first indication of a disturbance was manifested in the fifth experiment in which the cage was rotated; a total of 11 errors was made in three of the 14 trials. The sixth test involved the 300 * HARVEY CARR cleansing of the maze, and 14 errors occurred in the first trial. After the regular series of tests were completed, both cage and maze were rotated simultaneously in the hope of inducing more serious effects; error scores of 40, 5, and 1 were secured in three of the 10 trials. Rotation of cage and cleansing the maze were the only tests which induced disturbances, and it is possible that these results may have been due to chance irregularities. Granted the validity of the results, the question arises as to the sense avenue through which the changes were instituted. The changes resulting from cleansing the ma' e may well have been perceived through the sense of contact, for undoubtedly the contact values of the bottom of the runways were altered. Rotation of the cage may have affected the animal by means of its sensitivity to heat as the cage was located in the proximity of a steam radiator. The practical insensitivity of the blind and anosmic animal considered in conjunction with the sensitivity of all other groups including those animals which were blind and partially anosmic indicates that all of these alterations are sensed almost wholly through smell and vision. This conclusion does not warrant the assumption that the rat does not possess any other efficient avenues of sensitivity. The statement merely means that smell and vision are the only senses adapted to the detection of these particular alterations of the environment. Since vision and smell are the only effective senses in our conditions, it follows that all disturbances manifested b}^ the anosmic group must have been instituted by means of vision, and that we can utilize the data of this group in determining the function of vision. This hypothesis is supported by the facts, for the results are in harmony with the conclusions as to the function of vision previously derived from the differential records of the blind and normal animals. All experiments in- volving an alteration of the optical environment were very effec- tive upon the anosmic animals; this group of tests comprised rotation of environment, rotation of uncovered maze, and a change in the position of the living cage. On the other hand those experiments involving a minimal optical element, such as cleansing the maze and rotation of the covered maze, had little effect upon this group of rats. Moreover, the anosmic group when disturbed exhibited powers of adaptability on a par with MAZE STUDIES WITH WHITE RAT 301 normal animals. This adaptive capacity was in evidence in the experiments in which the environment was rotated in refer- ence to the maze, or the maze was rotated in relation to the environment. The records of these anosmic animals thus con- firm our previous conclusion as to the sensitive and corrective values of vision. The function of smell may be determined from several sources. 1. Since no other senses than smell and vision are concerned in these tests, the records of the blind rats must be due exclusively to the olfactory factor. 2. The differential sensitivity of the blinds as compared with those blind and partially anosmic must be interpreted in terms of smell. 3. The records of the normals as compared with those of the anosmic group must likewise be explained in terms of smell. Smell possesses a sensitive function; by this statement we mean that these alterations do affect in some way the animal's behavior through the medium of olfaction. All three sets of facts support this conclusion. The blind and partially anosmic group suffered less disturbance than the blind rats in every ex- periment in which comparisons are poss;ble. The anosmics on the whole manifested a lesser degree of sensitivity than did the normal animals; their sensitivity was much less for those experi- ments, e.g., cleanliness test, in which the olfactory element predominated. The blind animals, possessing only smell, ex- hibited the maximum amount of disturbance in those experi- ments in which the anosmic animals were the least sensitive. In the cleanliness test, those animals with smell intact, — blind and normal groups, suffered a pronounced disturbance, while but little effect was manifested by those groups in which olfac- tion was partly or completely eliminated. In the previous paper, we noted that blind rats were sensitive to alterations of the environment, and concluded that these alterations operated as distractive stimuli rather than as motor controls. The results of this paper prove that smell is the main mediating sense involved in the detection of these changes by blind rats. No additional facts were developed necessitating a revision of the conclusion as to the distractive character of these olfactory stimuli. Several significant features are contributed by the experi- ments concerning the functions of smell and vision in the mastery 302 HARVEY CARR of the maze. Anosmic animals learn the maze as readily as do normal rats. The olfactory operation produces no deleterious effect upon the vitality or behavior of the animals. The elimi- nation of vision slightly decreases learning capacity, but this effect is limited to certain individuals; the vital capacity of certain rats is also lowered. The combined loss of smell and vision exerts some effect upon vitality, but this effect is apparently no greater than that resulting from the loss of vision alone. The combined loss of the two senses results in a pronounced decrease in learning capacity, an effect which can not be regarded as the arithmetical sum of the results of the two operations taken separately. These facts indicate that the diminished vitality and learning capacity of the blind animals and the blind and anosmic groups can not be due to any effects of the operation per se, such as surgical shock, ether effects, etc. The anosmic operation is much more serious and difficult than the optic one, and any operative effects should be more evident and more extensive in the anosmic than in the blind groups. The reverse situation obtained; the anosmics were not affected while many of the blind rats were. The combined operation for the two senses is not any more prolonged or severe than for smell alone. If the operative effects are' responsible for the deficiencies of learning capacity, one should expect as good records from the blind and anosmic groups as from the anosmic animals; as a matter of fact the anosmic animals suffered no deleterious effects while the learning capacity of the blind and anosmic rats was far below normal. In the previous paper we noted three possible ways in which any sense might function in order to increase learning capacity. Sensitivity may be advantageous because of either a directive or tonic influence upon behavior and the vital activities. The removal of a sense organ may be disadvantageous not because of the elimination of sensitivity but because of certain deleterious effects of the operation itself. The directive function of vision for our conditions was decisively eliminated as one of the possi- bilities. The data of this paper also eliminates the third hypoth- esis. We are thus forced to conclude that the beneficial in- fluence of vision upon learning capacity is due to the tonic and stimulative effect of retinal stimuli. MAZE STUDIES WlTH WHITE RAT 303 Similar possibilities obtain for the function of smell in the acquisition of the maze habit. The facts previously given exclude, the hypothesis of operative effects for smell as well as for vision. As between the directive and tonic hypotheses no confident decision can be made. The records of the blind rats indicate that smell exerts no directive function after the maze is learned, but it is possible that olfactory controls may be utilized in the formation of the habit and yet be noneffective after the maze is mastered. The functions of smell and vision compensate for each other in the learning process. This fact is most easily interpreted on the basis that both senses have the same function. Since vision is efficacious because of its tonic effect, we would need to assume the same function for smell. On this hypothesis, a certain amount of sensory stimula- tion is necessary to induce sufficient motor activity requisite for learning. This effect can be secured through either smell or vision, while the elimination of both senses is disastrous. How- ever, it is not entirely impossible to conceive that the two senses may compensate for each other even though their functions are different. One may suppose that vision exerts a tonic effect while the function of smell is that of control. There is good evidence that control is secured mainly through the medium of the cutaneous and kinaesthetic senses. One may now suppose that the cutaneous and kinaesthetic control requires a certain amount of supplementation and that this effect may be furnished by either the tonic function of vision or the additional control exerted by smell. A final fact supports the tonic hypothesis for both smell and vision. The blind and anosmic animals dif- fered from the other groups in that they lacked persistence, initiative and incentive. I refer to the fact that these animals required help or additional stimulation in many of their trials. One possible interpretation of this fact is obvious; we may assume that these animals lacked a sufficient amount of sensory stimulation to arouse the motor activity adequate to the situa- tion. Their activity was deficient in vigor, decisiveness, and persistence. These animals possessed the normal amount of energy, and the proper kind of stimuli for the control and direc- tion of this energy, but they were so deficient in their sensory capacity that an adequate amount of this potential energy was 304 HARVEY CARR not released. Additional stimuli of an auditory or cutaneous character were requisite to overcome this deficiency. The comparative data confirm our previous conclusion that the eye possesses some peculiar adaptive capacity. The adap- tive power of anosmic animals is practically equal to that of the normals, while the capacity of both groups is much superior to that of the blind animals. The superiority of one group over another is thus not a matter of the number of senses, but rather of the kind of sense involved. Adaptation can not be con- ceived as a pure process of learning, since the blind and par- tially anosmic animals appeared to adapt as readily as did the blind rats although their learning capacity is much inferior. Neither can the differences in adaptive capacity of the various groups be due to operative effects, for on this hypothesis the adaptive ability of the anosmics should be inferior to that of the blind animals. There is no conclusive evidence that smell is concerned in the process of adaptation. Although the blind rats did adapt to the distractive influences of olfactory alterations, it is entirely possible that this effect was mediated through the kinaesthetic- motor processes. There is some evidence that the distractions mediated through one sense can be corrected for through another. If smell is concerned in any overt manner in the process of adaptation, one would expect the adaptive power of normal animals to be greater than that of anosmic rats. Likewise blind rats should manifest greater ability than that possessed by blind and partially anosmic animal sr There are no facts which indi- cate in any conclusive fashion the truth of either of these suppo- sitions. CONCLUSIONS The results of this series of experiments confirm the conclu- sions of other investigators that the maze habit consists essen- tially of a tactual-kinaesthetic motor coordination. This act is dependent, nevertheless, both during and subsequent to its development upon a wider sensory situation of which it is a part. This fact was proven by an experimental control of the relation between the animal and the environment. The sensory connection^ between the act and those aspects of the environment which were altered was mediated almost ex- clusively through vision and smell. MAZE STUDIES WITH WHITE RAT 305 The development of the act is contingent upon retinal impulses in two ways. On the one hand, retinal impulses operate as distractions, tending to prevent and delay the final perfection of the coordination. This distractive effect is present even when the relation of the visual environment to the rat remains stable. Any alteration of the environment from trial to trial increases the distractive effect. On the other hand, these retinal im- pulses tend to promote or condition the organization of the component elements of the act in so far as these impulses arouse the motor activity requisite to the solution of the problem. There are several wTays of conceiving of this relation between visual stimuli and increased learning capacity. The experiment furnished no data for a choice between the several possibilities. The development of the act is also dependent upon olfactory stimuli. No facts are pertinent as to the distractive or detri- mental effect of these stimuli. Olfactory impulses, however, aid in the development of the act. These stimuli may be uti- lized as controls, or one may suppose that they are advantageous because of their tonic effect upon the various activities involved in the process of learning. No confident decision can be made as between these alternatives, though the latter hypothesis re- ceives the greater support from the relevant data. The act is still dependent upon these visual and olfactory stimuli after it has become thoroughly automatized, provided it was developed while these stimuli were present. The act can be acquired and function successfully when these stimuli have been completely eliminated. When the act was acquired whiie these stimuli were present, it will still function successfully when they are subtracted at least in part, or so long as their positional relations to the organism remain unaltered. Any positional change of these stimuli or the addition of new elements operate to disrupt or interfere temporarily with the successful function- ing of the act. These changes of the stimuli function as dis- tractions; they release impulses which the organism is unable to integrate successfully into the series of motor activities. The act is temporarily disrupted or disorganized. Some degree of adaptation to these disturbances is the rule for all sensory groups. The experiments furnished no data which prove that smell is concerned in the process of adapta- tion. Vision certainly possesses an adaptive function. Of the 306 HARVEY CARR five suggested hypotheses as to the relation between vision and adaptation, two are disproven by the experimental data. Three possibilities remain. Adaptation may be a further process of automatization and rats with vision are at an advantage because of their greater learning capacity. Adaptation can not be ex- plained wholly in terms of this conception as the adaptive capacity of the various groups of animals is not proportional to their relative learning ability. Visual adaptation may be a process of decreasing sensor}-' susceptibility to the distractive stimuli. This conception can not wholly explain the phenome- non as certain facts indicate that vision can correct for dis- turbances mediated through other sensory avenues. Unaltered or familiar visual stimuli exert a quieting and reassuring effect upon the organism and enable it to resist the distractive effects of other stimuli. There are no facts which can not be explained fairly successfully on the basis of this hypothesis. The maze act and the learning process are much more compli- cated phenomena than the conclusions of some previous inves- tigators would indicate. The habit does not consist merely of tactual, kinaesthetic and motor elements. Other accessory and conditioning components are also present. Learning does not consist merely of the organization of certain tactual and kinaes- thetic stimuli with certain movements. Many other sensory factors are present which release their quota of impulses that must be harmoniously integrated and organized in some fashion adapted to the solution of the problem. All statements as to the functions of smell, vision, or other senses must be interpreted as applying only to the situations obtaining in these experiments. NOTES ON THE MIGRATION OF THE HESSIAN FLY LARVAE* BY JAMES W. McCOLLOCH Assistant Entomologist in charge of Staple Crop Insect Investigations AND H. YUASA Assistant in Life History Studies, Kansas Slate Agricultural Experiment Station CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 307 Methods of Study 309 Observations 310 Eggs 310 Hatching of eggs 310 Orientation of the larva 310 Migration of the larva on the leaf 312 Rate of migration 313 Variations in the rate of migration 317 Behavior of the larvae on migration 317 Variations in behavior 319 Mortality of larvae on migration 320 Influence of moisture 321 Influence of light and darkness 321 Discussion and Conclusions 321 Summary 322 Literature Cited 323 The migration of the Hessian fly (Mayetiola destructor Say) larva on the leaf where it hatches to its feeding place between the leaf-sheath and the stem is one of the most critical periods in the life history of the insect, yet the literature on this point in the life economy is very meager. Packard (1883, p. 213) makes the following statement: ' as soon as the footless larva or maggot hatches, it makes its wav down the leaf to the base of the sheath." Osborn (1898), fhorne (1902), Felt (1902), Webster (1906 and 1915), Forbes (1910) and many others simply recapitulate the brief statement quoted from Packard. Enock (1891, pp. 333-334) made some interesting observations on this point. He states that " the female fly, as a rule, lays 1 Contribution from the Entomological Laboratory, Kansas State Agricultural College, No. 26. This paper embodies the results of some of the investigations undertaken by the authors in the prosecution of project No. 8, Kansas Agricul- tural Experiment Station. 307 308 JAMES W. McCOLLOCH AND H. YUASA her eggs with the head end pointing downwards towards the main stem, so that when the tiny larva emerges it is started from its infancy in the right direction on its journey downwards, and, guided by the longitudinal striae of the leaves, it reaches the stem, round which the leaf -sheath is closely wrapped, but not too close to prevent the larva forcing its way; until, after some four hours' steady travelling (during which time it has covered only the small distance of two or three inches) , it reaches the base of the sheath." He also made some observations on the hatching of eggs that were laid " the wrong way, with the heads towards the tip of the leaf." In this case, " the larvae worked their way to the tip of the leaf, where some of them managed to cross the edge and get on to the back or under side, and com- menced their tremendous journey of four or six inches ! some arriving at their destination at the next joint below the one they would have occupied had the female laid her eggs on the inside of the upright leaf." Garman (1903, pp. 221-222) reports that " the eggs hatch in a week or less (three days in one instance observed), according to temperature, and begin their rather laborious journey to the leaf-sheath, during which they find even an egg or egg-shell an obstruction to be surmounted with difficulty. From the slow- ness of their progress the trip requires hours of time, and except- ing as their minute size protects them, they are completely at the mercy of enemies. No doubt many of them are lost at this period of their lives." The same author states (p. 221) that when the eggs are laid on the lower surface of the leaf ' the helpless young must have difficulty in finding their way between the leaf-sheath and the stem, with a good chance of perishing before this is accomplished, since it is their habit to follow closely the grooves in which they hatch down to the junction of blade with stem." Gossard and Houser (1906, p. 4) report that the young larva " starts at once down the leaf, following the groove or crease in which it hatched, or an adjacent one, until it reaches the base; from this point it burrows between the leaf sheath and the stalk until it reaches the foot of the culm, . . . While on this downward journey, which may occupy several hours, the young larva is easily deflected from its course by dirt particles or mechanical obstructions, and may lose its hold and fall to THE MIGRATION OF THE FLY LARVAE 309 the ground, or may die, and in dried and shriveled condition remain for a time on the leaf." After performing some experi- ments to see if the larva could follow the creases of the blades up an incline, if it were necessary for the ]arvae to do this, in order to reach the base of the culm, they state (p. 5.) that "in no instance did a larva make more than a slight advance up- ward, and most of them, died with their bodies extended cross- wise of the creases, near the points where they had hatched." They add that the bearing of this experiment on the following statement quoted by Packard (1883, p. 212) is readily appre- hended: " A reason given by some why the fly does not injure red wheat as much as white, is because the leaf of the red grows so long and slants down from the shoot, so when the egg hatches, the maggot works down the wrong way, falls to the ground, and so many fail to harm the wheat." Headlee and Parker (1913, pp. 95-96) state that the larva ' seems to have various means of getting ' down into the plant ; some observations made by Mr. Kelly would indicate that in the presence of abundant dew it is washed down by the droplets of water. In other cases it undoubtedly crawls down, earth- worm-like, following the groove until it reaches the place where the leaf -sheath winds tightly about the stem. Get down as it may, when once there it squeezes in between the leaf -sheath and the main stem and continues its way downward until it nearly reaches the point where the leaf takes its origin. Just above this point it stops and begins to feed." METHODS OF STUDY The experiments on which this paper is based were carried on in the breeding chambers of the air conditioning machine described by Dean and Nabours (1915). The temperature was maintained at approximately 70° and the humidity at about 70%. The wheat plants were grown in wide-mouth bottles containing Pfeffer's liquid plant food solution.2 The roots of 2 Pfeffer's solution for wheat cultures is prepared as follows: Calcium nitrate 4 grams Potassium nitrate 1 gram Magnesium sulphate 1 gram Potassium dihydrogen phosphate 1 gram Potassium chloride 0.5 gram Ferric chloride Trace Distilled water 5 liters 310 JAMES W. McCOLLOCH AND H. YUASA the plants were kept in the liquid while the remainder of the plant was outside the bottle. The plants were held in place with a cotton stopper in the mouth of the bottle. This method proved very satisfactory because of the fact that the plants could be handled conveniently and the various stages of the fly could be studied with greater ease and exactness than when the plants were grown in soil. OBSERVATIONS Eggs. — The egg of the Hessian fly is very minute, being only about 0.5 mm. in length, cylindrical, obtusely rounded at the ends, glossy, translucent and pale yellowish red. This color deepens with the development so that just before hatching it is distinctly reddish in color. About the second day after deposition the posterior end of the egg becomes opaque, and shows no reddish content. This is very characteristic of the fertilized egg. The caudal extremity of the embryo is located in this end of the egg. Generally, the eggs are laid on the upper surface of the leaf, being glued into the longitudinal creases of the leaf -blade. Frequently the eggs are laid on the lower side of the blades of wheat plants, and occasionally on the stalk. Hatching of Eggs. — The majority of eggs hatched in about 60 to 72 hours after deposition under the experimental condi- tions of the breeding chamber where the mean temperature was 70° F. and the mean relative humidity 70%. The exact method whereby the hatching occurs is not as yet ascertained. The egg-shell seems to split along its cephalo-dorsal aspect and the larva emerges quickly. Enock (1891, p. 333) records some observations on the hatching of the eggs. He found that the movements of the inclosed larvae could . be distinctly seen on the third day and on the fourth day he was able to distinguish the muscular efforts of the larvae to burst open the shell, which they succeeded in doing after three or four hours work. Orientation of the Larva. — Immediately after emerging from the shell, often before the body is more than one-half out of the egg-shell, the larva begins to turn sidewise, describing an arc and finally orients itself in the direction exactly opposite to that in which it had been within the egg (Fig. 1). This orientation behavior was first noticed when larvae, hatching from the eggs laid by a female held in an inverted position on THE MIGRATION OF THE FLY LARVAE 311 the leaf during oviposition, instead of moving down toward the base of the leaf as the larvae were ordinarily known to do, moved up toward the tip of the leaf. In order to see if this seemingly abnormal behavior was merely accidental or really of regular occurrence, the following experiment was performed: A young wheat plant was held in an inverted position and a female was allowed to oviposit on it. After the eggs were laid, the plant was turned right side up and kept under observation for the hatching of the eggs. Emergence occurred on the third day and the larvae turned away from the base of the leaf and moved up toward the tip of the leaf. This simple experiment Fig. 1. — Hessian fly larva hatching from egg and turninp toward posterior end. was repeated a number of times and the result was always the same. Then the test was made with a number of modifica- tions. In the first place, the influence of the orientation of the egg itself on the subsequent orientation of the larva was to be tested. In order to do this, it was necessary to have the eggs laid in as wide a variety of ways as possible, keeping in mind the possibility of such occurrence out in nature. Barring the minor modifications, there are three distinct ways in which eggs may be laid: (1) The eggs may be laid with their anterior end pointing toward the tip of the leaf. This is what happens in normal situations when the female stands on the leaf with her head toward the tip of the latter. Since this mode of oviposi- tion by Hessian fly is the most general out in nature, and since this is the most natural way of ovipositing under ordinary cir- cumstances, it will be designated in this paper as normal. (2) The eggs may be laid with their anterior end toward the base of the leaf. This is the .situation exactly opposite to that of the first, and, undoubtedly, is of rare occurrence in nature. • Only under forced conditions, and then with difficulty, will the female at- tempt to lay eggs while in an inverted position. Many such 312 JAMES W. McCOLLOCH AND H. YUASA attempts fail to bring about actual oviposition. The artificial method whereby the inverted eggs may be secured has been already described. The same result may be realized when the leaf is long and bends over, and the female alights beyond the bend with her head towards its base The base in this situa- tion will be higher than the tip of the leaf. This mode of oviposi- tion and the orientation of the egg will be here designated as inverted. (3) The eggs may be laid transversely or at varying angles with the long axis of the leaf. It is only necessary to mention that the three conditions described above are capable of modifications and also that they can be realized on the lower as well as on the upper surface of the leaf. A series of experiments with eggs laid according to the methods stated above were performed, in connection with which more than three hundred larvae were studied and their behavior recorded. In no instance was the orientation of the larvae, soon after hatching, not in accordance with the expectation. Every one of the three hundred and more larvae turned towards the caudal end of the egg regardless of the manner of oviposi- tion, position on the leaf, and in cases of inverted oviposition, regardless of the fact that this orientation leads the larvae away from the only possible feeding place, namely, the base of the leaf-sheath. Migration of Larva on the Leaf. — The direction of movement, as has been stated, is predetermined by the orientation of the egg itself, and is not in any way influenced by the condition of the leaf upon which it is laid. After the initial orientation, the larva usually starts without delay on the journey down the leaf, following the first or second grooves adjacent to the one in which the egg was located. The movement is subject to variation in regard to the rate of progress, although generally it is a slow process. The larva may move continuously or it may rest now and then. When it reaches the base of the leaf or the ligule, it crawls up the latter, squeezes in between the leaf-sheath and the main stem, and continues its way down- ward to a point just above the joint or origin of the culm. In the case of inverted oviposition, the larva, on hatching, turns toward the tip of the leaf and this is the direction of its pro- gress It works its way slowly up the leaf, against the force of gravity, and constantly subjecting itself to danger of various THE MIGRATION OF THE FLY LARVAE 313 sorts. When it reaches the tip of the leaf, it stops and appar- ently surveys the ground for a while, then getting by chance into another groove, it starts downward. Once on this course it works its way down in the same manner as the larva which came from an egg deposited in the normal manner. The behavior of the larvae hatched on the lower surface of the leaf is essen- tially similar to that of those on the upper surface. There was a tendency among the larvae from eggs laid in an inverted posi- tion on the lower surface to get over to the upper surface after they have gone up the leaf for some distance. Rate of Migration. — Individual differences influence the rate ■of migration more than physical factors, such as the degree of inclination of the leaf, temperature, humidity, mechanical ob- structions, and the like, although these factors always enter into the problem and need to be taken into consideration. The larvae which came from eggs laid in succession by the same female on the same leaf and in juxtaposition may not be able to move at the same speed. As a matter of fact, none of the larvae under observation moved according to any set of arbi- trary standards. Tables I and II show the rates of migration of larvae when the eggs are deposited normally and when they are deposited in an inverted position. TABLE I Rate of Migration of Larvae Hatched from Eggs Laid in Normal Manner Average time Average required to distance move 1 mm. traveled Total No. of larvae 205 4 min. 36.4 sec. 51.5 mm. No. of larvae that got down into sheath 157 4 min. 1.6 sec. 53.3 mm. No. of larvae died on leaf 48 6 min. 30.6 sec. 45.5 mm. TABLE II Rate of Migration of Larvae Hatched from Eggs Laid in Inverted Position Average time Average required to distance move 1 mm. traveled Total No. of larvae 119 51 68 3 min. 2 min. 4 min. 38.7 sec. 11.2 sec. 44.3 sec. 99.3 mm. No. of larvae that got down into sheath 144.9 mm. No. of larvae that died on leaf . . 65.1 mm. 314 JAMES W. McCOLLOCH AND H. YUASA It is interesting to note that larvae hatched from eggs laid in inverted position, not only traveled longer distances on an average but traveled at greater rates than those that hatched from eggs laid in normal position. Table III is a comparison of the rate of migration up the leaf with the rate of migration down the leaf when the eggs are laid in an inverted position. TABLE III Comparison of Upward Migration with Downward Migration. Eggs Laid in an Inverted Position Upward Journey — Total No. of larvae 30 No. of larvae that got down into sheath 18 No. of Isrvae that died on leaf. . . 12 Downward journey — Total No. of larvae 12 No. of larvae that got down into sheath 11 No. of larvae that died on leaf. . . 1 Average time required to move 1 mm. Average distance traveled 3 min. 43 sec. 4 min. 29.2 sec. 2 min. 35.3 sec. 3 min. 55.8 sec. 4 min. 10.5 sec. 1 min. 38.0 sec. 50.1 mm. 38.0 mm. 70.2 mm. 88.1 mm. 89.5 mm. 73.0 mm. Thus, as the table indicates, there seems to be no marked difference in the rate of progress during the journey in either direction, that is, the larvae, on an average, move with equal facility on either an ascending or descending incline. Table IV is appended in order to give a little more accurate notion of the migratory rate, since these larvae were under closer observation. TABLE IV Rate of Migration of Twelve Selected Larvae Hatched from Eggs Laid in an Inverted Position Upward Journey Downward Journey Entire Journey Average Average Average time time time required required required to move Distance to move Distance to move Distance Larva No. 1 mm. traveled 1 mm. traveled 1 mm. traveled sec. mm. sec. mm. sec. mm. 33-3 . . . 203 13 561 141 537 154 64-1 . .. 323 39 56 95 133 134 64-2 . . . 389 37 757 95 654 132 65-5 . . . 257 56 136 101 171 157 71-1 88 41 56 296 216 85 83 228 181 126 76-2 . . . 128 139 THE MIGRATION OF THE FLY LARVAE 315 Table IV— Continued sec. mm. sec. mm. sec. mm. 162-1 218 33 68 75 97 108 162-2 218 33 112 75 144 108 162-3 225 32 195 75 201 107 163-2 263 41 157 80 203 121 163-3 83 43 202 80 161 123 Average for 11 larva that reached the sheath 217.7 38.5 247.8 89.5 246.3 131.9 Larva that died on leaf 291 37 98 73 164 110 Average for 12 selected larvae 223.8 38.4 235.3 88.1 231.1 130.1 It ma}^ be of interest to note that there seems to be, as the preceding tables indicate, no correlation between the rate of migration and the distance traveled by the larvae resulting from two types of oviposition or between those larvae which died on the leaf and those that successfully reached the base of the plant. The maximum and minimum rates of migration when eggs are laid normally and when they are deposited in an inverted position are shown in Tables V and VI. Part 1 of each table gives the maximum and minimum average rates of migration with the distance traveled, while part 2 shows the maximum and minimum distance traveled. TABLE V Maximum and Minimum Rates of Migration of Larvae when Eggs Are Laid in Normal Manner Part 1. — Maximum and minimum average rates of migration and distances trav- eled at these rates: Average time Larva required to Distance No. move 1 mm. traveled Larvae that got down into sheath .... Larvae that died on leaf 231-1 Max. 27 sec. 131 mm. 276-1 Min. 1800 sec. 2 mm. 241-1 Max. 94 sec. 38 mm. 277-4 Min. 4500 sec. 8 mm. Part 2, -Maximum and minimum distances and rates of migration used to travel these distances : Average time Larva required to Distance No. move 1 mm. traveled Larvae that got down into sheath .... Larvae that died on leaf 270-1 Max. 533 sec 162 mm. 276-1 Min. 1800 sec. 2 mm. 265-3 Max. 43 sec 84 mm. 250-2 Min. 900 sec. 4 mm. 316 JAMES W. McCOLLOCH AND H. YUASA TABLE VI Maximum and Minimum Rates of Migration of Larvae Hatched from Eggs Laid in Inverted Position Part 1. — Maximum and minimum average rates of migration and distance trav- eled at these rates. Entire Journey Upward Journey Downward Journey Average Average Average time time time required required required to move Distance to move Distance to move Distance 1 mm. traveled 1 mm. traveled 1 mm. traveled Larvae that got down into sheath — No. 208-1 Max 24 sec. 294 mm. ? 139 mm. ? 155 mm. No. 64-2 Min 654 sec. 132 mm. 389 sec. 37 mm. 757 sec. 95 mm. Larvae that died on leaf — No. 221-1 Max 41 sec. 131mm. ? 44 mm. ? 87 mm. No. 226-1 Min 2769 sec. 26 mm. ? 26 mm. 0 0 Part 2.— Maximum and minimum distances and average rates of migration used to travel these distances: Larvae that got down into sheath — No. 208-1 Max 24 sec. 294 mm. ? 139 mm. ? 155 mm. No. 70-1 Min 72 sec. 100 mm. ? 20 mm. ? 80 mm. Larvae that died on leaf — ■ No. 217-3 Max 46 sec. 158 mm. ? 98 mm. ? 60 mm. No. 236-1 Min 300 sec. 12 mm. 300 sec. 12 mm. 0 0 According to Table IV, which records the behavior of 12 selected individuals which came from eggs laid in inverted posi- tion, there is absolutely no correlation of any sort between either the maximum or minimum speed and distance or maximum or minimum distance and speed. But Tables V and VI indicate that there seems to exist, so far as these particular individuals are concerned (although the same conditions apparently hold true in a number of other cases) certain correlations between the two items under consideration. The larvae which moved fastest traveled longer distances than those that moved slowest, and the larvae that traveled the longest distances moved faster than those that traveled the shortest distances. The rate of migration either on the upward or downward course, or on the upper or the lower surface of the leaf does not seem to be affected to any marked extent by the degree of inclination of the leaf. The leaf may have an inclination of anywhere between zero and 90 degrees, but the larvae seem to be able to move with equal facility in either direction. Acceleration or retardation, if any, THE MIGRATION OF THE FLY LARVAE 317 due to the inclination of the leaf, usually is not appreciable; and even if it were of appreciable magnitude, it is better inter- preted in terms of individual differences rather than due directly to any difference in the inclination of the leaf. Variations in the Rate of Migration. — Every larva has a more or less different average speed from any other larva. Each larva has different speeds at different stages of migration. This varia- tion in rate of migration in individual larvae can be seen in figures 2 and 3. f\e \f\. "Vrv \ t\ ut t v Fig. 2. — Chart showing the distance traveled and the rate of migration of six larvae hatching from eggs laid in the normal position. The dots indicate the loca- tion of the larvae at the time of observation. As is shown in the figures, there seems to exist no regularity in the rate of progress in individual larvae. They may move faster at the beginning or toward the end of migration, or they may move fastest at the middle of the journey. Again, they may move for some time and then rest for an interval of from five or ten minutes to twelve hours or more. Behavior of the Larvae on Migration. — The exact manner of the locomotion of the larva is hard to observe because of the minute size and the opaqueness of the wheat leaf. The larva seems to move in somewhat the same fashion as other footless insect larvae. The muscle tension coupled with the moist integument bearing intersegmented grooves and the rather rough, hairy condition of the creases of the leaf seem to operate in assisting 318 JAMES W. McCOLLOCH AND H. YTJASA the propulsion of the body of the larva. The process of orien- tation following hatching usually places the larva in a groove within the radius of the length of the body, which may be the first or second groove from the one in which the egg was laid. Once in a groove, the larva follows it down or up, as the case may be, until it reaches the end of the chosen path. In the case of normal deposition, this is the base of the blade where the short erect ligule which surrounds the stem arises. The ligule is a barrier which every larva must overcome, either by crawling over, as the majority of the larvae seem to do, or by Fig. 3. — Chart showing- the distance traveled and the rate of migration of five larvae hatching from eggs laid in an inverted position. The dots indicate the location of the larvae at the time of observation. avoiding it entirely by finding elsewhere a point of entry be- neath the leaf-sheath. The larva, under favorable conditions, such as a clean, smooth ligule which is loosely wound around the stem, gets between the sheath and the stalk in a compara- tive short time. When the conditions are adverse, such as dirty, hairy, tight-fitting ligule and dry weather, the larva finds it extremely difficult to surmount the barrier and, in many cases, death overtakes it at this point, the usual mortality at this situation under experimental conditions being about 25%. The locomotion of the larva after it gets below the ligule has not been studied. When the larva, directed by the initial pro- cess of orientation, moves upward and reaches the tip of the THE MIGRATION OF THE FLY LARVAE 319 leaf where the grooves converge into a point at the extremity of the blade, it is then thrown upon its own resources in finding its way. It naturally performs random movements and in so doing it is likely to place itself now in inverted position in one of the grooves. This opens a way for the larva to escape the distracting maze of the tip of a leaf, and, after adjusting itself to the groove, it starts back down the long way it has so labor- iously climbed up. Variations in Behavior. — Although the larva is not known to refuse to turn round away from the direction of the anterior end of the egg, it may show individual differences or devia- tions from the ordinary course of behavior during migration on the leaf. Occasionally, a larva is found to cross the leaf-blade from one surface to another. This may happen at any point on the leaf but it usually takes place at or near the tip where the larva is forced to find a new way by random movements. When a larva meets an obstacle, e.g., a dirt particle, it usually seeks to avoid it by moving to an adjacent groove. Sometimes it may overcome the difficulty by actually crawling over the obstacle, or it may be forced to carry the impediment on its back, if the object is light enough to be lifted or pushed along. Small drops of water may wash the larva down away from the plant. A very small amount of water is found to be sufficient to trap the larva which loses it hold, and in case of a droplet, the maggot is not able to overcome the surface tension and free itself from watery imprisonment. It is not known whether the larva is capable of feeding on the leaf while migrating, although it seems to be the general feeling among the entomologists that it does not feed during this time. Enock (1891, 9, 334), however, states, that " the larva increases in width even before it dis- appears out of sight, leading one to suppose that it imbibes moisture as it journeys down the furrows of the leaf." Several cases of reversal of the direction of migration without apparent causes were noticed. In one case the larva, hatching from an egg laid on the lower side of the leaf, passed down to the stalk near the point where the latter passed into the culture solution. The larva turned around and started upward on the stalk which was standing vertically. After moving about 20 mm. the larva again reversed its direction of progress and started downward. In other cases, larvae were found to climb up the central stalk 320 JAMES W. McCOLLOCH AND H. YUASA instead of crawling down into the culm. It is interesting to note that the larva seems to be unable to distinguish the right direction from the wrong when deflected from the former; e.g., larva 270-3, while moving down, was overtaken by larva 270-4, which forced i't into the adjacent groove. The larva 270-3 was inverted completely by this treatment and when it started on its way was moving toward the tip of the leaf. This one died after moving 30 mm. Mortality of Larvae on Migration. — The larvae, during their migration on the leaf, are in the critical period of their life and it is probable that many of them die. That such is the case is shown in Table VII, which gives the percentage of mortality of larvae from both normal and inverted eggs. Table VIII gives the details of the 68 larvae which hatched from the eggs laid in inverted position and which died on the leaf during migra- tion. It is interesting to note that 53% of these larvae failed to reach the tip of the leaf. It is well to note, however, that these larvae had traveled the average distance of 56.6 mm. before they died. TABLE VII Mortality of Migrating Larvae Larvae Larvae that got that Total down into died on Mortality, No. sheath leaf % Larvae from eggs laid normal 205 157 48 23.4 Larvae from eggs laid inverted 119 51 68 57.1 Total 324 208 116 32.7 TABLE VIII Analysis of the Mortality of 68 Larvae that Hatched from Eggs Laid in an Inverted Position No. of No. of No. of larvae larvae larvae died on died on died on Total upward tip of downward No. migration leaf migration Larvae from inverted eggs that died on leaf 68 36 8 24 53.0 11.7 35.3 THE MIGRATION OF THE FLY LARVAE 321 Influence of Moisture. — The larvae seem to prefer moist air. Enock (1891, p. 335) found that " the progress of the young larvae was very much accelerated when the leaf was moistened, and many died on a hot, dry day." In a condition where the relative humidity of the air is 50%, the larva, if it ever hatches, has great difficulty in making its way down the leaf. In every case under this humidity the larvae failed to move but short distances and invariably died. Too much water, e.g., rain, will also be detrimental for then the larvae are likely to be washed away from the plant. Excessive dew may produce the same result. Influence of Light and Darkness. — Not enough work has been done to justify any statement concerning the behavior of larvae under various conditions of light, but judging from the result obtained in an artificial cave wThere the light is very weak, the general behavior of the larvae seemed not at all modified from that in the bright light. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The most interesting thing that was found so far as this study has progressed concerning the behavior of the larva, is the fact of orientation immediately following hatching. Regu- larity of its occurrence is significant. Possible advantages to be derived from this arrangement are not difficult to see. Since the eggs are laid normally with their anterior end pointing away from the base of the leaf, and since the larvae emerge from that end of the egg, the larvae must, under ordinary circum- stances, turn round before they could possibly get down into the leaf-sheath, a process absolutely necessary for the life of the larvae. The orientation is therefore a distinct advantage to the larvae for it helps the latter to find their way quickly and properly. Furthermore, by being set in the right direction, the larvae are so directed as to minimize the period of exposure to the adverse conditions, for it is obvious that the sooner the larvae get down into the leaf -sheath, the safer they will be from the possible dangers, such as mechanical injury, attack from parasites and predaceous enemies, desiccation, etc. It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss the force that is re- sponsible for this phenomenon of orientation. Whatever the nature of this directing force may be, the fact of orientation 322 JAMES W. McCOLLOCH AND H. YUASA certainly is an adaptation, a process distinctly advantageous in the life economy of the insect. As to the nature of the stimulus or stimuli in response to which the larvae manifest the migratory behavior, experimental data are lacking, but from the nature of the case, this phenomenon of migration might be interpreted as the result of positive thigmotropism and also possibly of posi- tive geotropism. It is interesting to note that Enock (1891) found that the larvae moved towards the tip of the leaf when the eggs were deposited in an inverted position but he failed to notice the orientation of the larvae on hatching. Gossard and Houser (1906, pp. 4-5) seemed to have had difficulty in making the larvae ascend a slope of about 45 degrees. In the present work, however, it was found that the larvae are not only able to ascend an inclined leaf (to the height of 139 mm., in one case) standing almost perpendicularly, but they do so regularly if the eggs are laid in an inverted position. The reason quoted by Packard (1883, p. 212) why the red wheat is less injured by the fly than the white wheat needs revision, because the sloping leaf has nothing directly to do with the larvae working down " the wrong way." Whether the larvae are assisted by dew in their migration down the leaf blade, as suggested by Headlee and Parker (1913, pp. 95-96), needs, in the writer's opinion, closer scrutiny for the data on hand seem to indicate that the larvae find great difficulty in overcoming the surface tension of drops of water and, further- more, dewdrops do not always roll to the base of the leaf-blade and stop there until the larvae are safely discharged. SUMMARY 1. The direction of the migration of the larva in its initial stage is predetermined by the orientation of the eggs. The larvae on hatching always turn from the anterior toward the posterior end of the eggs. 2. The degree of inclination of the leaf has nothing to do with the direction of the larval migration. 3. The larvae are capable of locomotion on either an ascend- ing or descending incline of anywhere between zero and 90 degrees. 4. When the eggs are laid with their anterior ends toward the base of the leaf, the larvae, on hatching, crawl up the leaf THE MIGRATION OF THE FLY LARVAE 323 until they reach the tip, then turn and move downward. The larvae may die while on this ascending migration but apparently never try to change the direction of progress. 5. The rate of migration is extremely variable and seems to be influenced by individual differences rather than physical factors. The average time required by 205 larva hatching from eggs laid normally to move one millimeter was about four and one-half minutes, with extremes of one-half minute and seventy -five minutes. The average time required by 119 larvae hatching from eggs deposited in an inverted position to move one millimeter was about three and one-half minutes, with extremes of two-fifths of a minute and forty-six minutes. 6. The mortality of migrating larvae is greatest when the eggs are laid in an inverted position. Twenty-three per cent of the larvae hatching from eggs laid normally died on migra- tion, while fifty-seven per cent of the larvae hatching from eggs deposited in an inverted position perished. 7. When the eggs are deposited normally, the per cent of mortality increases with the distance of the egg from the ligule. When the eggs are laid in an inverted position, the mortality increases with the distance of the egg from the tip of the leaf. LITERATURE CITED Packard, A. S. The Hessian Fly — Its Ravages, Habits and the Means of Pre- 1883 venting Its Increase. U. S. Dept. Agri., Ent. Comm. 3rd Rept., pp. 198-248. Enock, F. The Life-history of the Hessian Fly, Cecidomyia destructor, Say. Trans. 1891 Ent. Soc, London, for 1891, pp. 329-366. Osborn, H. The Hessian Fly in the United States. U. S. Dept. Agri., Div. 1898 Ent., Bui. 16 (n.s.), pp. 7-57. Felt, E. P. Cecidomyia destructor, Say. N. Y. State Mus., Bui. 53, pp. 705-730. 1902 Thorne, C. E. The Hessian Fly in Ohio. Ohio Agri. Exp. Sta., Bui 136, pp. 1902 1-24. Garman, H. The Hessian Fly in 1902-1903. Kentucky Agri. Expi. Sta., Bull. 1903 111, pp. 213-224. Gossard, H. A., and Houser, J. S. Hessian Fly. Ohio Agri. Exp. Sta., Bui. 1906 177, pp. 1-39. Webster F. M. The Hessian Fly. U. S. Dept. Agri., Bui. of Ent., Cir. 70, pp. 1906 1-16. Forbes, S. A. The Hessian Fly in Illinois, 1910. Univ. 111. Agri. Exp. Sta., 1910 Cir. 146, pp. 1-4. Headlee, T. J., and Parker, J. B. The Hessian Fly. Kans. Agri. Exp. Sta., 1913 Bui. 188, pp. 83-138. Dean, G. A., and Nabours, R. K. A New Air Conditioning Apparatus. Journ. 1915 Ec. Ent., 8:107-111. Webster, F. M. The Hessian Fly. U. S. Dept. Agri., Farmers' Bui. 640, pp. 1915 1-20. REACTIONS OF OPALINA RANARUM By ELSA SHADALL University of Wisconsin 1. INTRODUCTION Although the anatomy and reproduction of Opalina ranarum have been carefully studied, the reactions of this mouthless entozoic infusorian have not been so thoroughly investigated. Probably the most comprehensive recent work is that of Met- calf ('09) who gives a splendid chronological review of the litera- ture. The first account, however, which deals with reactions, is that of Kuhne ('59) who describes the effect of a strong in- duction current on Opalina. Several years later, Nussbaum ('86) briefly described the structure and the method of swimming in the introduction to his theme on reproduction. In 1888, Entz worked on light reactions and concluded that Opalina was negative to light. A year later, Verworn ('89) obtained results on the effect of light which were exactly opposite to those of Entz. Verworn treats also of reactions to heat stimuli. Experiments in galvanotropism were performed by Birnkoff ('99), Putter ('00), Kolsch ('02), Wallengren ('03), and Hartog ('06). Dale ('01) gives the most detailed account yet published of chemotaxis and describes very carefully the movement of cilia and their behavior to chemical and electrical stimuli. Vene- ziani ('04) experimented with culture media of varied chemical composition and showed the effect of each on Opalina. His work was continued by Putter ('05) who discovered that a medium prepared from sodium chloride, sodium and potassium tartrate and distilled water was best. The work of Jennings ('06) con- cludes the list of publications on the behavior of Opalina. Opalina is a large ovoid protozoan completely covered by a pellicle and therefore without mouth or anus.1 It is strongly 1 Some of the earlier investigators (Kiinstler, '06, and Gineste, '06) claimed that a minute mouth was present on the ventral surface of the body, but their view has not been accepted by recent observers. The writer has made every effort to discover such an opening but without success. Specimens stained slightly with Delafield's haematoxylin and placed in a thin solution of gelatin afford excellent opportunity for observation but nothing could be discovered except little evan- escent folds which frequently appear when the body is in the proper position. 324 REACTIONS OF OPALINA RANARUM 325 flattened dorsoventrally and somewhat asymmetrical at the more pointed anterior end of the " adult " animal, (Fig. 1). From the anterior end to the notch, in the middle of the right side, the surface of the body is concave, and below the notch, this side is markedly drawn in. The left side shows no such irregularity. Cilia are distributed abundantly over the entire pellicle; on the dorsal and ventral surfaces. They are arranged Fig. 1. — Opalina ranarum. Ventral view (after Dolflein) in diagonal rows across the body. Small Opalinas or those formed by recent divisions usually have the posterior end more pointed than the anterior. The object of the present paper is to present a general ac- count of the behavior of Opalina and to compare its reactions with those of free-living protozoans which are well known through the work of Jennings, Mast, and others. The experiments discussed in this paper were performed in the Zoological Laboratories of the University of Wisconsin dur- ing the months of January, February, March and April, 1915. My thanks are due to Professor A. S. Pearse, under whose direc- 326 ELSA SHADALL tion the work was done. Practically all material used was obtained from the rectum of leopard frogs, Rana pipiens, which were kept in a tank of running water in a vivarium. Although the room was heated, the temperature of the water ranged from 2° to 10°C. Zeller ('76) observed that large Opalinas seemed to be absent from frogs in the month of January. This might be the case if frogs are allowed to remain in their natural habitats. During the present observations, however, Opalinas were apparently normal throughout the winter, though all frogs examined were not infected. Dobell ('07) pointed out that lack of food and increase in the number of bacteria in the rectum of the frog were causes of degeneracy in Opalina. In several instances, the writer noted that Opalinas were not found when there were no faeces or when the bacteria were few iri number. The largest numbers were obtained when there was a considerable quantity of faeces and when the number of bacteria was comparatively large. Material for observation was usually obtained from a frog by pithing or quickly chloroforming it. Putter's saline medium, already mentioned, or a physiological salt solution made suit- able culture media except when chemical stimuli were used. In the latter cases, it was found that by forcing water down the alimentary tract of the frog, a sufficient amount of liquid to serve as a medium for observations could be obtained without interfering with the normal activities of the Opalinas. When the medium was ready for use, enough was dropped on an ordinary slide to nearly cover one-half of it. If another liquid was introduced, it was carefully added with a dropper drawn to a fine point. Frequently the drop of chemical was placed next to the medium containing Opalinas, and then by the aid of a needle, was induced to flow across gradually. Experiments with colored liquids showed that diffusion took place quite slowly and that sometimes the introduced drop remained in only a small portion of the medium. A cover glass was usually not used. OBSERVATIONS ON LOCOMOTION Considering the environment of Opalina, it may be justly called a comparatively active creature, especially immediately after division. Other investigators have noted that the smaller REACTIONS OF OPALINA RANARUM 327 individuals are extremely active and swim rapidly as if in a state of excitement. Unless stimulated, the mature Opalina moves very smoothly and bends its body gracefully as it wanders in and out among the debris. Finely ground India ink and gelatin were used successfully in observing the movements. Opalina was frequently found at rest either at the edge of a drop of culture medium or against a bit of the faeces. It keeps its cilia in active motion, however, at all times and apparently does not attach itself in the same way that Chilomonas, Didi- nium, and Paramoecium do. The action system is essentially like that of many free swim- ming ciliates and flagellates. Opalina usually swims through the water in a spiral course, but quite often one is seen swimming without revolving on its long axis. Like many other ciliates, such as some Hypotricha and Colpidium, it often swims forward keeping one side against an object or in contact with the edge of a drop of liquid. In making its screw-like revolutions, Opalina turns over to the right. It was noted that Opalina does not make as many revolutions for a given distance as Paramoecium. Sometimes, it makes only half -re volutions at varying intervals, and then turns over toward the left for a time. There is another characteristic movement which does not seem to have been noted in other ciliates. Frequently, after making half a revolu- tion, an Opalina will turn back the same distance, and repeat this movement several times in rapid succession. The spiral course is much like that of Paramoecium as de- scribed by Jennings ('06). There are two factors which seem to influence this particular type of movement in Opalina — the forward movement of the animal, and the rotation on the long axis to the right. Cilia extending from the left to the concave edge on the right, beat directly backward and bring about the forward movement. The rotation on the long axis is due to the fact that the cilia on the surface of the body beat obliquely to the right and backwards. The revolving to the right is prob- ably partly due to the asymmetrical form and partly to the cilia at the anterior end which beat obliquely forward. If all the cilia beat directly backward the animal moves forward with- out rotating. The cilia on the surface of the body beat in a rhythmic wave-like manner. Objects, caught in the cilia at the anterior end, were carried down the surface of the body in 328 ELSA SHADALL jerks. The cilia on a pair of conjugating Opalinas beat in har- mony until the animals are ready to separate and then each set of cilia beats so as to part the pair. AVOIDING REACTIONS Opalina reacts to stimuli by using avoiding reactions similar to those of Paramoecium, Chilomonas (Jennings, '06) and Didinium (Mast, '09). It backs for a short distance without revolving on its long axis, and after turning to the right, swims forward at an angle to the original course. Sometimes the angle may be as much as 90.° An Opalina may make " tests ' in several directions, moving forward or to the side, trying the conditions until they prove to be satisfactory. When reacting to some stimuli, Opalina swims in a circle without revolving and keeps the left side away from the center of the circle. Certain stimulating agents cause it to turn " somersaults " by bending up the anterior end and going over and over, but this type of reaction was not common. In several instances it was possible to be very certain of the exact position of the body during rapid movements on account of a little blister or some other peculiarity. Individuals which came in contact with objects did not always back away but sometimes turned directly to the right. The locomotion of a conjugating pair is similar to that of single individuals. REACTIONS TO MECHANICAL STIMULI While swimming in a normal medium, Opalina frequently comes in contact with various objects and responds by the avoiding reaction already described. It may not retreat at all, however, but become fixed against a bit of faecal matter and remain in contact with it for some time; the behavior resembling Paramoecium against a bacterial zoogloea. If bits of filter paper are put into the medium, Opalina responds when it touches them with the avoiding reaction, or merely rests against them, beating its cilia as it does when standing against faecal debris. Occasionally, it moves along the edge, keeping the body close against the paper. The ability to select food is not as evident in Opalina as in Didinium or Lacrymaria (Mast, '09, '11). Opalina does not readily discriminate between organic or inorganic matter for it REACTIONS OF OPALINA RANARUM 329 will rest against a glass rod, a needle, or bit of filter paper, as readily as against faecal debris. Particles which might contain food are brought to the resting protozoan by the vigorous stroke of the cilia. When the anterior end of Opalina is touched by a fine needle or a glass rod, the animal usually responds with the avoiding reaction. If the same stimulus is applied to the side of the body, there is usually no reaction, although there is occasion- ally a forward movement. Opalina will allow itself to be pushed along with a needle without attempting to move away. REACTIONS TO CHEMICAL STIMULI In studying the reactions of Opalina to chemical stimuli the fluid contents of the frog's rectum served as a medium in order to have conditions as normal as possible. This was usually alkaline, but sometimes slightly acid, and though such varia- tions may have caused discrepancies they were probably neglible. Dale ('01) has carefully worked out the chemotaxis of Opalina in alkaline, acid, and neutral cultures. Opalina showed posi- tive reactions to acids and negative to alkalies; but in an acid solution was negative to stronger acid and positive to alkali. Although Opalina resembles Paramoecium in its responses to chemicals, it is usually slow in reacting to stimuli. It often- times swims quite a distance into a strong solution before react- ing. The chemical, if injurious, proves fatal before the animal can make its escape. Usually, however, an Opalina will swim up to the border of a chemical solution and turn directly to the right. Like Paramoecium, Opalina sometimes enters and swims directly across a drop of a solution without response until it comes in contact with the original liquid on the other side, where it gives the avoiding reactions. As Dale ('01) pointed out, Opalinas are occasionally seen in clusters which are probably due to the presence of carbonic acid. The writer noted that Opalinas were frequently grouped together when taken from the rectum. As Mast ('12) noted i.n the case of Peranema, there was no evidence of orientation with regard to the direction of diffusion of the stimulus. Chemicals sometimes caused Opalina to swim in circles without revolving on the long axis. When Opalina is dropped into distilled water, it swims hur- riedly about for a time. Tap water placed next to a drop of 330 ELSA SHADALL culture medium was avoided for a short time, such water is less dense than the usual medium. Dilute salt solution induces the avoiding reaction when Opalinas are transferred to it from the rectum of a frog. If an iodin-green or methyl-green crystal is dropped into a culture medium of Opalinas, they will respond by the avoiding reactions (Fig. 2). In some instances, they collected around CULTURE Q 9 0 ■■■ ssQ,, 0 -;■■.■ METHYL GREEN -o 0 <±/h J o 0 CULTURE METHTLENE BLUCy Fig. 2. — Showinp reactions to chemicals the crystals but, as they are very susceptible to these chemicals, in a short time even comparatively dilute solutions caused death. Peranema (Mast, '12) is apparently much more resistant to the effect of iodin-green, methyl-green, and methyl-blue. Opalina avoids methyl-orange and a .4% solution of methylene blue (Fig. 2). If, by chance, it has ventured into these chemi- cals, it will turn to the right without revolving or backing, and find its way out. It was noted that some Opalinas which swam REACTIONS OF OPALINA RAN ARUM 331 around in the chemical for some time would respond when encountering the culture medium. Opalinas collected about acids introduced into the alkaline culture medium. Opalina is more susceptible to hydrochloric than to acetic acid. In one case, it was noted that Opalina lived in .01% solution of acetic acid for fifteen minutes before it proved fatal. Opalina reacts positively to nitric, sulphuric and formic acids. Even when acids were quite concentrated, it does not give avoiding reactions. The concentrations used varied from N-500 to N- 10,000. Opalina avoids neutral salts and those exhibiting basic prop- erties. If a .2% solution of sodium chloride is added to the medium, Opalina, like Spirostomum (Jennings, '00) will avoid it by turning to the right and swimming off in a new direction. Opalina also responds by the avoiding reaction to a .005% solution of potassium hydroxide. It also is negative in its reac- tions to .02% to .002% solutions of each of the following salts: ammonium chloride, calcium chloride, potassium chloride, and a similar per cent solution of sodium hydroxide. In one case in which calcium chloride was used the strong repellent action was particularly noticeable; a large number of individuals, near the salt, moved away and crowded together at the opposite end of the slide. TEMPERATURE Unlike Paramoecium and Oxytricha, Opalina does not give the avoiding reactions to change in temperature. As Verworn ('89) observed, it swims indifferently from a warmer to a colder area and vice versa. If a quantity of culture medium, heated to about 40° C, is put on one end of the slide, Opalinas coming in contact with the warmer liquid swim actively about. When they approach the center of the heated area, motion ceases entirely, the cilia continue to vibrate rapidly for a few minutes, and then stop beating; the entire animal soon disintegrates. That Opalina is not very resistant to heat is shown by the fact that if it is allowed to remain in a temperature above 22° C, it dies in a short time. If Opalina is dropped into a heated medium, it does not respond by the avoiding reaction as has been observed in Pleuronema (Jennings, '06). Opalina shows a very great resistance to extremely low temperatures. It does not react to water at 2° C. 332 ELSA SHADALL Temperature reactions were also studied by siphoning water of various temperatures through an exceedingly fine capillary U-shaped tube. With this apparatus a more uniform and defi- nite temperature was obtained. The tube which rested on the slide was observed under a microscope. Opalina swims in- differently up to the cold or warm tube, rests along the surface or may move along in close contact with it. REACTIONS TO LIGHT Light induces no change in the movements of Opalina as is also true of Paramoecium and other colorless ciliates. Neither an increase in intensity nor a decrease causes a response. Con- trary to what Entz ('88) observed, Opalina may be suddenly exposed to very bright sunlight and then quickly shaded with- out causing it to react. There was no evidence that it oriented in horizontal rays of light. In one instance, where a number were oriented in the direction of the source of light, there was no response when the slide was turned 180°. Polarized light or red light have no effect on movement. In some of the experiments with light a Nernst lamp of about 650 candle power was used in a dark room. By moving the light to various distances, varying from 12-178 inches from the Opalinas, different intensities were obtained but no reaction was noted. SUMMARY 1. Opalina usually swims in a spiral, though it frequently travels long distances without rotation, or moves along the surface of some object without turning over. When feeding it remains in contact with the debris and keeps the cilia vibrating rapidly. 2. The spiral course is due to the forward movement of the organism and the rotation on its long axis. Opalina often makes half a revolution and then turns back the same distance. 3. Opalina reacts to stimuli by moving backward a short distance without rotating and then turning to the right at an angle to the original course. If it is stimulated, it " tries " many different directions until one is found which proves satis- factory. When stimulated Opalina often swims in a circle, without revolving, keeping the left side turned away from the center. REACTIONS OF OPALINA RANARUM 333 4. Mechanical stimuli sometimes induce the avoiding reac- tion. Opalina frequently swims indifferently up to glass, needle, filter paper and other objects, remaining against them as if in contact with food. Opalina responds by retreating when the anterior end is touched with a fine rod but does not react when the side of the body is stimulated. 5. Opalina lives in both acid and alkaline media. When in an alkaline medium it reacts positively to acids and negatively when encountering neutral and basic salts. It may cease to react to a chemical after repeated stimulation and remain in the chemical. Solutions of different strengths cause the avoid- ing reaction when Opalina swims from one to the other. Opalina does not avoid strong acids. 6. Opaiina does not react to heat or cold. It is much more resistant to cold than to heat. It may live at temperatures of from 2° C. to 22° C. 7. Light apparently has no effect on the orientation or move- ment of Opalina. BIBLIOGRAPHY Dale, H. H. Galvanotaxis and chemotaxis of ciliate infusorians. Part 1. Journ. 1901 of Physiol., 26, 291-361. Dobell, C. C. Physiological degeneration in Opalina. Quart. Journ. Microsc. 1907 Science, 51, 633-646. Jennings, H. S. Studies on reactions to stimuli in unicellular organisms. I. Re- 1897 actions to chemical, osmotic and mechanical stimuli in the ciliate infusoria. Journ. of Physiol., 21, 258-322. 1900 Studies on reactions to stimuli in unicellular organisms. II. On the movements and reactions of the Flagellata and Ciliata. Amer. Journ. Physiol., 3, 229-260. 1906 Behavior of Lower Organisms. New York. 366 pp. Kunstler, J. et Gineste, C. Orientation du corps des Opalines. C. R. Soc. 1906 Biol. Paris, 61, 136-137. Mast, S. O. The reactions of Didinium nasuium (Stein). Biol. Bull., 16, 91- 1909 118. 1911 Habits and reactions of the Ciliate lacrymaria. Journ. of An. Belt., 2, 91-97. 1911a Light and the Behavior of Organisms. New York. 470 pp. 1912 The reactions of the Flagellate Peranema. Journ. of An. Beh., 2, 91-97. Metcalf, M. M. Opalina. Its anatomy and reproduction with a description of 1909 infection experiments and a chronological review of the literature. Arch. f. Protis., 13, 195-375. Verworn, M. Psycho-Physiolpgische Protistenstudien. Jena. 219 pp. 1889 Zeller, E. Untersuchungen ttber die Fortpflanzung und die Entwicklung der in 1877 unseren Batrachiern schmarotzen den Opalinen. Zeilschr. f. Wissen. Zool., 29, 352-379. SIMILAR BEHAVIOR IN COW AND MAN WITH A NOTE ON EMOTION C. S. YOAKUM The University of Texas The two incidents herein described present features of such similarity that they seem worthy of record among investigations bearing on comparative problems and especially among state- ments concerning instinctive (?) tendencies. Fig. 1 Fig. 1 gives the essential features in the setting of the first incident. The Jersey cow was walking along the side of the road toward us, near the position marked A, when the light of the automobile at B, first disclosed her presence. As the car approached her, going in a straight line as indicated, she turned in an easy curve, not abruptly, and walked in the direction indi- cated. The distance across the road was relatively short, so that by the time the car reached her, the driver was forced to swerve 334 SIMILAR BEHAVIOR IN COW AND MAN 335 the car sharply to our left to avoid hitting her head with the front fender of the car. As the front end of the car passed, the cow jerked her head sharply to the left and thus avoided collision with the rear end. The incident occurred about seven o'clock in the evening. It was sufficiently dark so that objects to the human eye, when dark adapted, gave only indistinct outlines. In the lighted roadway in front of the car objects such as sticks, stones, and uneven places in the road-bed could be seen distinctly. At least four possibilities are open. The behavior of the cow may indicate some form of heliotropism, or the difference in distinct- ness of pathways may have operated to change the animal's behavior. A third hypothesis might combine the two factors suggested. We may also designate this behavior as habitual. T l A /it I D Fig. 2 Fig. 2 gives the surroundings of the second incident. My office is next door to the room outlined in the diagram. I was working by electric light one evening at my own desk and had occasion about eight o'clock to place some papers on the desk of this adjoining room. I entered the room, laid the papers on the desk, and returned to my own office. On my return, I found I had failed to replace all of the papers. Picking up those remaining, I retraced my steps. I placed the second set of papers with the first and started to return. On reaching the location indicated, B, my head jerked back and I turned ab- ruptly to my left. I was not approaching the door as can be seen from the diagram. 336 C. S. YOAKUM For the first time, I now seemed aware of the setting of the situation in which I had just reacted as described. The moon's rays were shining through the window W, and lighted up an area of the wall and a few inches of the floor back of the spot marked B. The lighted area was about three feet wide and extended up two feet on the dark gray wall. In the corner of this illuminated area was a small, round gas stove and a few strands of insulated wire loosely coiled. The moon's rays did not reach the doorway by which I was attempting to pass out. The point reached, B, is approximately five feet from that one usually passed over in going out of the room by daylight. Up to the point of the second change in pathway in order to avoid the wall and to go out by the door, the reactions of the cow and of myself are similar. Objectively the incidents may be described in identical terms and no one can seriously urge that consciousness took any prominent part in either subject's behavior. In the two cases, we have positive reactions whose settings are strikingly similar; and in the cow's head jerking to the left and in my own head jerking back, we can see the typical withdrawal reaction. Anecdotes are plentiful of horses and cows refusing to be driven from the lighted areas around burning barns, etc., but I can at present recall no case of so direct a human response to lighted areas, uncomplicated by implications of inner purpose. The explanations suggested above for the cow's behavior ap- pear accurate and complete here also. After making the withdrawal reaction of the second trip, my consciousness of the situation included a distinct and clear revival experience accompanied by feelings of astonishment and excite- ment. My behavior now differed materially from the first form. I stopped, looked at the lighted area, turned around toward the window, and left the room slowly. No one who has made the two trips or had seen them made could avoid the conclusion that a distinct change in behavior had taken place. I now knew definitely that I had taken the wrong path on the first return trip also. (I fear the behaviorist will not read much further.) But the shift from the pathway toward the lighted area to that through the doorway the first time must have taken place quite smoothly for I can find no memorial evidence and no hints indicating perseverative tendencies in the recollections of the interval between the two trips. Nevertheless, after the second SIMILAR BEHAVIOR IN COW AND MAN 337 trip, I remembered the reaction of the first. Theoretically, the first reaction and the whole first trip must have persisted and modified the behavior on the second journey. For example, I could recall a slight, but noticeable increase in the speed of my movements as I placed the forgotten papers with the others, — placing these papers on my colleague's desk would close my work at the office for the evening. We may then postulate two new factors in the conditions of the second trip; on the evidence of recall, there was the perseverative influence of the first reac- tion; and there is distinct introspective evidence of a slight annoyance over the necessity of repeating the process. Looking back over the few moments involved, I can find no form of evidence for believing that I was aware of going toward the lighted area. The instinctive or habitual behavior and the conscious processes seem ideally teased apart in the incident. The details of my thoughts were about the contents of the papers and my trip homeward; and I am unable to connect any portion of the mental process with the change in behavior that led away from the door on both return trips, and announced itself so vividly on the second. On the other hand, the mental processes connected with the behavior during the emotional excitement that followed the second reaction are clear. The kinaesthetic wave that localized itself in the muscles of the neck, shoulders, chest, and upper arms was distinctly noted at the time. Detailed thoughts about the lighted area, the relation of pathway to desk and door, astonishment at the sudden movements made, and a diffused intellectual excitement accompanied the later wavering behavior above described. We cannot omit to recall in this connection, Professor Dewey's suggestions concerning a theory of emotions. Although the total equilibrium is not laid bare, nevertheless, the only ground for astonishment and excitement seems to rest in the sudden break- ing of the steady progress toward the lighted area on the wall by the energetic jerk of the head backward. " What to do about it " is thrust forcibly into the foreground of consciousness. Briefly, we see that objectively the reactions of the cow and of the human are describable in the same terms. In the latter no preliminary conscious process is discovered to explain either the reaction to light or the withdrawal reaction. The conflict between the positive reaction to light and the avoidance reaction are the immediate precursors of a definite emotional state. FREQUENCY AND RECENCY FACTORS IN MAZE LEARNING BY WHITE RATS JOSEPH PETERSON University of Minnesota Let us assume that the number of previous runs in any unit of the maze (frequency) determines the direction a rat running the maze in the process of learning will take at any bifurcation encountered, and that probability alone governs the early " choices " at such positions.1 On these assumptions an inter- esting explanation of maze-learning by rats has been made. Let us start an imaginary rat in a ten-cul-de-sac maze and de- termine its course at each bifurcation by nipping a coin: " heads," it keeps its direction — forward or return, in which- ever it happens at the time to be going; " tails," it enters the blind alley. On emergence from the blind alley, " heads " again takes it in the direction it had when the blind alley was encoun- tered and " tails " means a return, the reverse of that direction. The results of one such trial are here given to make more concrete the method. F in the lower line means movement toward the food box (forward) and R signifies a return, the reverse direction. An R underscored means that the return is complete and that the direction of movement is reversed, put- ting the animal again at the first bifurcation — at the first blind alley. The figures represent blind alleys entered. hththttththhhthtththhh F2F3F4R3R2R#F2F3RR1 R F F htththhhttthtthhhhthth F4RR2RAF2R1 R I KFFFF5F6F tttthhhh 7 R6 FFFFF(to food box). 1 Throughout this discussion the word "choice" is used in the sense of going into one of two possible alleys open to the animal at any given bifurcation in the maze, not as implying any voluntary selection. 338 FACTORS IN LEARNING BY WHITE RATS 339 Figure I, a schematic maze with ten blind alleys, will make the results clear as recorded. The reader should keep the rule in mind and follow the rat through in detail. It will then be clear why a returning animal emerging from a blind alley gets F for a t and a second F for an immediately succeeding h, and vice versa. Numbering and lettering the sections of the maze as shown in the figure, we may tabulate the choices of our hypothetical rat at the several bifurcations in a convenient manner for close inspection (Table I). The data of the first trial, already given on the previous page, are here tabulated as " trial 1." The other trials were made in the manner already described. The 1 3 5 7 <7 •r /I En A B C D E r g H I J fooiii i \Box\ 1 Z 4 i 8 JO Fig. 1. — A schematic maze to show the lettering and numbering of the different sections. Numbers indicate blind alleys. four trials are sufficient to illustrate the point in mind, and the method of analysis to be applied to results of actual rats learn- ing the maze. In the table the letters Fd and Rt in the second column, under the caption " direction," show whether the animal was running forward or whether it was returning when the scores in the line in question were made. Thus the record starts with the animal passing cut de sac 1 and entering 2. That is, the first choice is B, the section of the correct path, the next is the second blind alley; then the forward direction is taken on emerg- ence from 2, and 3 is entered; again the forward direction, and 4 is entered. From this point the animal makes a complete return, entering 3 and 2, but not 1 on the way; and so on. The summary of results of the individual trials and the general summary of the four trials show separately, for each lettered section of the maze, the total runs for each direction — Fd and Rt. In the case of the blind alley sections these two sets of totals, for forward and return runs, are combined, since the animal traversed those units in the same direction whether the blind allev was entered on a forward or on a return movement. 340 JOSEPH PETERSON 1— 1 f— t-H - O f-H rH -1 O 1-1 f-H i t-H rH 01 o O " ,-H rH t-H rH 0-. 00 O O ffi T— 1 »H f-H rH I> T— 1 T-H t-H »— 1 0 rH rH (N t-H rH to f— I r-H CM O (n r— I rH t-H rH LO f— t r- ( t-H ^H W f-H rH t-H f-H (S <* f-H f— t CM t-H t-H CM Q f-H f-H t-H f-H t-H CM H9 t-H t-H r-H t-H T-H CM fO CO f-H f-H f-H CO t-H «-H CO U f-H t-H f-H f-H f-H *-H r-H CO f-H t-H CM W N < n t-H f-H r-H r-H r-H in r-H t-H t-H t-H t-H f-H to « t-H t-H f-H t-H t-H t-H t-H t-H t-H in t-H t— 1 t— 1 t-H t-H t-H t-H CO t-H t-H t-H t-H CO t-H t-H t-H t-H t-H w < LO (0 c o o CI u 5 D "5 +. c f- c 1 -rj 4-"Tj *-l*o ■♦-'"O ■*-,*0---**O-t-'"0-r-l*O fcPifcPifcKfcKfciHQHbHCiifcDHfc 1 cm Is FACTORS IN LEARNING BY WHITE RATS 341 fin rH ** rH *N ** o l-H rH rH CM o CM 1-1 rH i-H »H rH i— 1 CM <*> rH o — CM \0 o> rH CO rH i-H I* - i-H i—l i— 1 r- 1 i— 1 IN CO rH o ▼H CM 00 l-H i-H o rH X «— 1 i-H i-H i-H PI 1— I o o t> i-H l-H o CO 0 l-H l-H i-H i-H rH CM ro rH o *H CO 50 rH i-H i-H rH ■* i-H t—i CM 00 b i-H i-H t-H i-H i-H ?-H co rH i-H rH rH rH CM fO in Lfl i-H i-H i-H i-H i-H in l-H rH CM a> w i-H rH i-H i-H i-H i-H f—t rH tH it l-H rH rH CO 00 n **H >* i-H i-H rH i-H rH i-H ID i-H rH i-H x2> x3> . . . . xl0. Just how much greater in each case? Evidently, according to the foregoing, x2 = 3/4 of xu x3 = 3/4 of x2, Xi = 3/4 of x,, . . . . x10 = 3/4 of xt. But x10 equals the total number of trials3 that the animal has made up to the point of consideration in the experiment, or the total number of times that it has reached the food box, since each trial 3 Trial is here used in the sense of a continuous effort ending only when the food box is entered. 344 JOSEPH PETERSON has only one run past cul de sac 10. Hence, if #10 = n, X9 = 4/3 of n = 1.33m, X, = (4/3) »m = 1.78m, %-, = (4/3) »m = 2.37m, x6 = (4/3) — 1 rH pa o o> rH oa CM t— 1 X Oh O 00 ^H oa oa pa pa X to X 1— 1 QJ J -4-» pa hffl a pa fa ca^oa oa t> C o X rH O Da Pi uW m>~ ^ pa fa oa^On oa 10 tO XX X CO fa rH CO ^oa pi oa oa- X Oh X X X Oh X to 90 lO CQ a rH cq a n D5 g oa oa £ £ £ IH fa oa CO I— ( W ■o a! oa oa oa ° rH XI Di Da U fc u.« -° 2 -° fa u, oawoa paxoa oa£oa rH fO vH ■* rH N XX fa X « rH rH Q Xl TJ X. •*■• 6 Oh SPi *- rH u, X Oh O +J ^ 2 ^ x oa £ pa •° 2 oa oawoa OS CO dq n 2 § rH ffl ^ C 1) oa oa IH rH rH O J6 XX X X OS rH 03 X U b X X X Pi LO CM rH u ^oa pa oa oa oa oa oa oa U fa oa XX X X Ch ^ u oa oa pa u u,oa oa fa oa fa 9> rH ^ oa oa Ph X X to < X X X LO c o u 5 a c fagfaPSfaPSfaPSfaPSfaPifaPifa iH H *TJ+J»rJ+j'Q+j»rJ4J'rJ+j'TJ^-rJ+j»rJ+j'rJ faPSfaPifagfaKfaPSfaPSfa&faOSfa CM H "a -wn -*-> tj +J 13 fa«fa«fa«fa 1 CO ■a 3 6 5 c o o •a . S >< o o C v a; >-< u C crj c ST TJvC Ui OX o ■>-» o O rtxi c o "*h rt PhJ3 ..« §11 cjX O >. ■w O £8 '- Li +-> R c I' & >- C .. a) >>rr u CT C "2 c ° u "O u .S « « 'Sis xOh _ o ■3 2 ■c« §£ II rS fa 352 JOSEPH PETERSON < °g i—i CQ CQ *s o f— 1 X 2 CM t-1 »H CQ CQ O 05 XI X CM en H h-4 Xl « CQ O 00 i-H 1— I a «— 1 -f CQ ffl CQ f— 1 t> »-H r-( 0 i-H CQ CQ O Cfl o fc i— < )-> X e w N < in i— | n CQ £ CQ CQ CQ t> W t— 1 CQ (i. CQ fe fc. CQ < rt1 »— 1 X X CO Q pH X tf CQ CQ CQ b CQ l> CO i-H CQ U b CO O i— ( CQ xx j3 « £ XKCQ CO CM »-H u CQ OS u u <£> W N < pa i-H CQ X X ]5 )3 CQ CQ CQK£KCQ »-< X X CM «! •° ft! CQ b ■<* a .2 u 1m 5 CO ■*-> e2 Trial 1— Fd Rt Fd Trial 2— Fd Rt Fd 1 CO 13 'C H FACTORS IN LEARNING BY WHITE RATS 353 Tables II and III show many evidences of effects of frequency and recency factors. For instance, Rat 11 (Table II) returned rather regularly in the first trial from cul de sac 5 ; in the second trial it went into 8 and returned from there three times — once entering 8 twice in immediate succession — and got its forward orientation again rather regularly at 4; in the third trial blind alley 3 became effective in turning the animal forward from returns. It will be noticed that in this trial the animal entered 4 on the forward run, due likely to the frequent entrances to 4 in the second trial, and that this led to a confusion and a return to 3. It should not be overlooked, however, that some of these repetitive entrances to blind alleys may be due more to the position of these cul de sacs in the maze (i.e., to the physical circumstances of the learning situation) than to frequency and recency. This seems particularly to be true of cul de sac 5 in the B-mazes and of 4 in Maze IA. The effect of such physical conditions is obviously to increase considerably in the early trials the apparent effects of frequency and recency factors as these are determined in the present paper. Making allowance for such matters, we find that the influence for learning of fre- quency and recency in the early trials is surprisingly small. In many cases, as has been pointed out, the influence of these fac- tors is against learning, other factors having to throw the re- sponses out of frequency channels. These other factors are in all probability visceral; they are larger bodily reactions away from monotonous repetitions which are unprofitable to the entire organism. Of late these factors seem to have been neglected in psychology under the dominance of the too mechanistic associationism. Physiologists in work like that of Professor Cannon on emotional responses are reminding us that the organ- ism after all reacts in a unitary way according to its own organic needs. It would seem that while pleasantness and unpleasant- ness are likely not in themselves causal factors in behavior12 these affective " states " are plainly indicative of visceral par- ticipation— probably inhibitions and facilitations which we have yet to discover — in the learning process. A detailed study of the seventeen individual records is inter- 12 Peterson, Jos. Completeness of Response as an Explanation Principle in Learning. Psychol. Rev., 1916, 23, 153-162. 354 JOSEPH PETERSON esting from several standpoints. It shows not only the dangers of generalizations based on averages, on time and " error " curves without detailed analyses, etc., but also many marked individualities of the several animals. Since it is impossible to say how much mere probability has operated in these early reactions to critical positions in the maze, these reactions are less certainly significant of individual differences than are differ- ences in the more general behavior — speed, cautious attitudes, etc. — so frequently commented upon by various writers. Summarizing in tabular form the results of all the critical choices of the several animals of the three groups, and, finally, of all together, we get the following tables (Tables IV-XIV) : TABLE IV Summary of Critical Choices of First Three Trials by Six Rats in Maze IB Trial number r13 b Rf Fr R B Totals Rat 13 1 2 3 0 3 4 1 5 12 0 0 3 0 1 8 0 2 5 1 10 21 2 21 53 Totals 7 18 3 9 7 32 76 Rat 18 1 2 3 5 3 4 13 4 7 0 2 2 1 0 5 2 1 0 16 6 11 37 16 29 Totals 12 24 4 6 3 33 82 Rat 12. . 1 2 3 3 8 0 5 8 2 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 2 2 10 8 11 29 13 Totals 11 15 0 4 3 20 53 Rat 10 1 2 3 4 2 1 6 13 2 1 3 1 0 8 1 6 5 1 6 16 8 23 47 14 Totals 7 21 5 9 12 30 84 13 r = contrary to recency expectations; b = contrary to both recency and fre- quency expectations; Rf = in agreement with recency, and contrary to frequency expectations; Fr = the reverse of Rf; R = in agreement with recency expecta- tions; B = in agreement with both frequency and recency. FACTORS IN LEARNING BY WHITE RATS Table IV— Continued 355 Trial number r b Rf Fr R B Totals Rat 9 1 2 3 1 0 3 2 0 28 0 2 6 0 1 12 0 1 6 3 7 46 6 11 101 Totals 4 30 8 13 7 56 118 Rat 11 1 2 3 6 6 1 16 21 6 4 6 4 1 10 4 4 2 1 25 36 12 56 81 28 Totals 3 43 14 15 7 73 165 Grand totals .... 54 151 34 56 39 244 578 TABLE V General Summary of the Six Rats in Maze IB Trial No. r b Rf Fr R B Totals 1 2 3 19 22 13 43 51 57 5 13 16 2 23 31 13 11 15 53 85 106 135 205 238 Totals 54 151 34 56 39 244 578 TABLE VI Table V Expressed in Percentage Trial No. r b Rf Fr R B Totals 1 2 3 13.3 10.7 5.5 31.8 24.8 24.0 3.7 6.3 6.7 1.5 11.2 13.0 9.6 5.4 6.3 39.2 41.5 44.5 100 100 100 Totals 9.3 26.1 5.9 9.7 6.7 42.2 100 r + b = 35.4 R + B==48.9 356 JOSEPH PETERSON TABLE VII Summary of Critical Choices of First Three Trials by Four Rats in Maze IA Trial number r b Rf Fr R B Totals Rat 7 1 2 3 5 2 3 3 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 3 5 11 9 15 Totals 10 11 0 0 5 9 35 Rat 5 1 2 3 0 5 0 1 21 7 0 6 0 0 8 2 1 3 0 0 33 14 2 76 23 Totals 5 29 6 10 4 47 101 Rat 1 1 2 3 5 2 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 2 1 13 3 9 24 7 Totals 7 8 2 3 3 17 40 Rat 8 1 2 3 1 3 2 2 9 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 4 0 3 7 3 6 26 6 Totals 6 11 3 1 4 13 38 Grand totals. . . . 28 59 11 14 16 86 214 TABLE VIII General Summary of Four Rats in Maze IA Trial No. r b Rf Fr R B Totals 1 2 3 11 12 5 9 37 13 0 8 3 0 12 2 3 10 3 5 56 25 28 135 51 Totals 28 59 11 14 16 86 214 TABLE IX Table VIII Expressed in Percentage Trial No. r b Rf Fr R B Totals 1 2 3 39.3 8.9 9.8 32.1 27.4 25.5 0.0 5.9 5.9 0.0 8.9 3.9 10.7 7.3 5.9 17.9 41.5 49.0 100 100 100 Totals 13.1 27.6 5.1 6.5 7.5 40.2 100 r 4-b = 40 .7 R +B==47 '.7 FACTORS IN LEARNING BY WHITE RATS 357 TABLE X Summary of Critical Choices of First Three Trials, Seven Rats in Maze I IB Trial number r b Rf Fr R B Totals Rat 15 1 2 3 7 1 1 17 1 4 3 1 1 5 1 1 2 0 0 11 9 8 45 13 15 Totals 9 22 5 7 2 28 73 Rat 24 1 2 3 2 2 0 12 8 3 1 0 1 2 3 0 3 3 1 10 10 8 30 26 13 Totals 4 23 2 5 7 28 69 Rat 20 1 2 3 6 • 2 3 5 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 4 7 11 16 13 20 Totals 11 12 1 0 3 22 49 Rat 21 1 2 3 1 2 1 7 8 1 0 3 1 0 5 2 2 2 1 12 17 8 22 37 14 Totals 4 16 1 7 5 37 73 Rat 22 1 2 3 3 4 2 9 4 3 0 1 1 1 4 0 1 3 2 5 7 7 19 23 . 15 Totals 9 16 2 5 6 19 57 Rat 23 1 2 3 0 4 1 0 20 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 17 8 0 45 13 Totals 5 22 1 1 4 25 58 Rat 17 1 2 3 1 4 0 4 16 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 3 1 2 14 9 8 39 14 Totals 5 23 3 0 5 25 61 Grand totals .... 47 134 18 25 32 184 440 358 JOSEPH PETERSON TABLE XI General Summary of Seven Rats in Maze IIB Trial No. r b Rf Fr R B Totals 1 2 3 20 19 8 54 58 22 4 8 6 8 14 3 10 16 6 44 81 57 140 196 104 Totals 47 134 18 25 32 184 440 TABLE XII Table XI Expressed in Percentage Trial No. r b Rf Fr R B Totals 1 2 3 14.3 9.7 7.7 38.6 29.6 21.2 2.9 4.1 5.8 5.7 7.2 2.9 7.1 8.2 5.8 31.4 41.3 56.7 100 100 100 Totals 10.7 30.4 4.1 5.7 7.3 41.8 100 r 4-b = 41 .1 R + B= = 4< ).l TABLE XIII General Summary of All Seventeen Rats in the Three Mazes Trial No. r b Rf Fr R B Totals 1 2 3 50 53 26 106 146 92 9 29 25 10 49 36 26 37 24 102 222 190 303 536 393 Totals 129 344 63 95 87 514 1232 TABLE XIV General Summary of All Seventeen Rats Expressed in Percentage Trial No. r b Rf Fr R B Totals 1 2 3 16.5 9.9 6.6 34.9 27.2 23.4 2.9 5.4 6.3 3.3 9.1 9.2 8.6 6.9 6.1 33.7 41.4 48.3 100 100 100 Totals 10.5 27.9 5.1 7.7 7.1 41.7 100 r + b=38 .4 R + B=4* 5.8 FACTORS IN LEARNING BY WHITE RATS 359 It will be noted that the summaries of the first three trials of the animals of each group approximate rather closely the results of all seventeen, so far as combined recency and fre- quency relations are concerned; i.e., 38.4% against the expecta- tions based on recency alone and on both recency and frequency, and 48.8% in agreement with the expectations on recency alone and on both recency and frequency. The differences of physical conditions in the three mazes used — slight in the case of the B-mazes, differences only in the relative lengths of the cut de sacs similarly located with respect to the correct path — do not show themselves much in these results. Of course, only a small number of animals were tried on each maze and the present results need corroboration by more extensive studies. It is obvious that there is a gradual increase with successive trials, in all three mazes, in the reactions agreeing with recency expec- tations or with recency and frequency expectations combined; and that there is a corresponding decrease in reactions violating such expectations. Table XV shows this tendency. It would TABLE XV Showing Gradual Increase with Successive Trials in Reactions Favoring Recency and Frequency Expectations Trial Four Rats in Maze IA Six Rats in Maze IB Seven Rats in Maze I IB All Seventeen Rats No. r +b R + B r + b R + B r + b R + B r+b R + B 1 2 3 71.4 36.3 35.3 28.6 48.8 54.9 45.1 35.5 29.5 48.8 46.9 50.8 52.9 39.3 . 28.9 38.5 49.5 62.5 51.4 37.1 30.0 42.3 48.3 54.4 seem from this table that the change is most rapid in the easiest maze, IA, as is to be expected. It cannot be too strongly pointed out, as has already been mentioned, that this increasing percentage of reactions agreeing with the expectations based on recency and frequency effects, as learning advances from the first random stages toward the establishment of a regular habit, cannot be safely regarded as evidence that learning is brought about by recency and frequency factors: our evidence seems to justify the contrary conclusion, that this increase in reactions 360 JOSEPH PETERSON favoring recency and frequency factors is the result of the learn- ing. A completed habit must give 100% of sUch reactions.14 It is not contended here that our results show the effects of frequency and recency on behavior to be negligible. On the contrary, their effects are obvious in any detailed study of the rat's learning in the maze, pursued by the method of analysis here developed. But so far as the bringing about of the short cuts (the elimination of useless acts) in learning is concerned, recency and frequency factors do certainly not seem to play the important part that they have been considered to play in maze learning. It is but natural to suspect that the same thing will' hold for other types of learning. It seems that we are in need of searching analyses of the detailed aspects of all sorts of learning. Our initial spurt of progress in the study of learning has passed and mere time, error, discrimination, and average attainment curves of general results can no longer solve the problems that we are coming to as soon as we begin more detailed studies. So far as experimental evidence goes at present it would seem that maze learning by rats agrees in the main with the results to be expected on the basis of probability - frequency factors as their general results were pointed out in the early part of this paper; that is, that the blind alleys nearest the food box are first eliminated, and that entrances to blind alleys are great- est near the starting place in the maze and decrease for the successive cut de sacs directly with their nearness to the food box. Recent results published by Hubbert and Lashley18 seem to agree with this conclusion, though these results raise other problems the solution of which is not yet made clear. Miss Hubbert found in an earlier research16 no invariable sequence in the elimination of blind alleys, but the more recent article cited admits that " when averages of very large groups of animals are taken there does seem to be progressive elimination of errors for the food compartment to the entrance of the maze." 17 Miss Vincent's18 14 See an erroneous conclusion by Hamilton in his interesting monograph, A Study of Perseverance Reactions in Primates and Rodents. Behav. Mon., Ser. No. 13, 1916, pp. 38-46. 16 Hubbert, H. B., and Lashley, K. S. Retroactive Association and the Elimina- tion of Errors in the Maze. Jour. Animal Behav., 1917, 7, 130-138. 16 Elimination of Errors in the Maze. Ibid., 1915, 5, 66-72. "These averages as given in the later article are, goinp- in the order from en- trance place toward the food box: 30.6, 26.4, 19.7, 19.7, 18.7, 8.3. 18 Vincent, Stella B. The White Rat and the Maze Problem. IV. The Num- ber and Distribution of Errors: A Comparative Study. Jour Animal. Behav., 1915, 5, 367-374. FACTORS IN LEARNING BY WHITE RATS 361 and my own19 results show in general the same progressive elim- ination of errors. Hubbert and Lashley classified the errors in the circular maze into those of wrongly passing a door (type I) and those of turn- ing in the wrong direction (type II). The errors of type I they found to be eliminated in less than two-thirds the trials neces- sary for the elimination of those of type II. The serial back- ward elimination of errors of type I was found to agree in the main with results of the other studies cited in the preceding paragraph, but no such serial elimination of the type II errors took place. They find, in accord with our own results, that the animals seem to orient themselves to the maze as a whole, favoring in the several blind alleys the inward direction which in the circular maze is always toward the food box. If the individual reactions of each animal had been studied more in detail these experimenters would likely have found the expla- nation of the differences in the method of elimination of the two types of errors. Our results, in the monograph already referred to, show that the animal soon learns to keep its general forward orientation in the maze, and also that the final stages of the elimination of blind alleys are frequently accompanied by a confusion to the animal which results in entrances to cut de sacs nearer the food box, already eliminated. A study of the situation in the circular maze seems to suggest that the early development of the forward orientation tendency would tend to throw the animal into the blind alleys entrance to which constitutes errors of the second type. In every case a rat keep- ing its general forward direction and avoiding the error of type I would be thrown into an error of type II. This condition cer- tainly would seem to invalidate the authors' general conclusion as to the relative frequencies of elimination of the two types of error. Moreover, since the rate of elimination is studied in terms of the number of trials required to avoid successfully the entrance to a blind alley, it must be recalled that the final trials for elimination of the cut de sacs first encountered will bring about confusions resulting in entrances to some of those already eliminated, further along the trail. From these con- fusions errors of type II would most probably result, for the reason already indicated. The matter seems to need further investigation. These difficulties make plain how necessary it 19 Cited in note 5. 362 JOSEPH PETERSON is to avoid the fallacy of assuming — and these authors, I believe, do not assume this — that each response can be considered on its own account, rather than in relation to other reactions con- cerning vitally the welfare of the entire organism. It would seem that with a different arrangement of the relations of the two types of blind alleys in the circular maze, so that the objec- tion here urged would be met, results in this maze would in gen- eral agree with those obtained in the use of other mazes,20 show- ing that on the whole there is a progressive backward elimination of errors in the maze. There are, of course, many circumstances, making entrances to certain cut de sacs more probable than to others, that tend against this general rule. No maze in exist- ence has cut de sacs all presenting equal difficulty to the animal. The writer believes that in spite of the shortcomings of the frequency factors as an explanation principle of maze learning, the general considerations which he has discussed in the first (the theoretical) part of this paper satisfactorily account for the progressive backward elimination of errors in the maze, to the ex- tent that it actually occurs, and also for the fact that the number of entrances to blind alleys increases roughly with their distance from the food box. There seems to be no ' retroactive associ- ation " necessary, as Hubbert and Lashley rightly conclude. If frequency and recency factors play the unimportant part in actual learning that our present data seem to indicate, .to what neural and physical conditions, then, must we look for the main factors that bring about the elimination of random acts and the changes in behavior characteristic of learning? The writer has attempted elsewhere to indicate in a general and tentative way the answer to this question. In support of his contention that our neural explanations have usually been so simple as to throw us into a mechanical associationism which finds difficulty in explaining the changes in behavior character- istic of learning; that neural processes are inconceivably com- plex so that the general consistency of the circumstances, organic and extra-organic, forces short-circuiting of impulses in the cen- tral nervous system,- — in support of this position the writer is pleased to quote a few lines from Professor C. J. Herrick21 which have come to his attention since the former articles were written : 20 Cf. Carr, H. A. Distribution and Elimination of Errors. (An abstract.) Psychol. Bull, 1917, 14, p. 58. . 21 Introduction to Neurology, 1916, p. 306. See also page 296 and Ch. XXI. FACTORS IN LEARNING BY WHITE RATS 363 " Between the sensory projection centers and the motor areas are interpolated the association centers, and these are so ar- ranged that all correlation, integration, and assimilation of present sensory impulses with memory vestiges of past reac- tions are completed, and the nature of the response to be made is determined before the resultant nervous impulses are dis- charged into the motor centers. Only such of the motor areas will be excited to function as are necessary for evoking the particular reaction which is the appropriate (that is, adaptive) response to the total situation in which the body finds itself. This arrangement of association centers in relation to a series of distinct motor areas provides the flexibility necessary for complex delayed reactions whose character is not predetermined by the nature of the congenital pattern of the nervous connections." Through our inheritance from association psychology we seem to have fallen into a narrow, mechanical view which in the case of our own conduct belies our introspective reports, a view which is narrow and untrue not because it attempts to be biological as opposed to spiritualistic but because it so much neglects the larger visceral reactions with which we are just now becoming better acquainted. The reaction away from monotonous and unprofitable repetitions, of which we have found so plentiful illustrations in the rat's maze-learning, is similar to what we find in our own conduct. Professor Dodge, in his presidential address before the American Psychological Association, empha- sizes a view in his treatment of the subject of fatigue which seems to agree with our own. On the particular point in question, the influence of general visceral demands, he says: ' In my own case I have been interested in observing how every prolonged period of monotonous work like correcting papers, for example, finds before its close some insistent demand for interruption. If I successfully suppress one demand, more insistent ones arise, until finally effective voluntary reinforcement of the main task suddenly ends."22 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION Working 'on Professor Watson's suggestion, that probability determines the early reactions of the rat in the maze and that the principle of frequency finally determines which of the various 22 Dodge Raymond. The Laws of Relative Fatigue. Psychol. Rev., 1917, 24, 89-113. Quotation is from page 111. 364 JOSEPH PETERSON random acts will survive, i.e., that it brings about the learning, we have found by flipping coins that probability does afford an explanation of how the animal finally reaches the food box in the maze, but that it fails to explain alone or in connection with recency how the useless acts are eliminated. Recency and frequency factors do not seem to explain how the short-cuts in behavior characteristic of learning come about. Probability and the effects of recency and frequency factors supplemented by certain visceral directive factors, do, however, seem to account in a satisfactory manner both for the elimination of cul de sacs in a progressive backward order, roughly speaking, and also for the greater number of entrances to cul de sacs in the first part of the trail and for the general correlation between the number of such entrances and the distances of the respective cul de sacs from the food box. Tabulations of the reactions of seventeen rats in their first three trials in three different mazes — six in one, four in another, and seven in the third — show that, contrary to certain current views, over 50% of the rat's early critical choices at bifurca- tions in the maze are the opposite of what would be expected on the basis of recency and frequency factors. Responses favor- ing expectations on recency and frequency increase and finally reach 100% when the learning is complete. This, however, is not evidence that these factors bring about the learning. The converse is true: the modification called learning increases fre- quency and recency responses. It is suggested that this may also be true of other types of learning. There seems to be clear evidence of the operation in learning of visceral factors controlling, for the general demands of the organism, the associations which are formed. Choices at bifur- cations in the maze are not predictable on the basis of frequency and recency alone as applied to individual responses; each re- sponse must be considered in the light of the whole situation to which the animal as a unitary organism is reacting. The elimination of random acts, of entrances to cul de sacs, seem to be comprehensible only on this basis. This seems to indicate that the laws of association are not the dominantly controlling factors that they have credit for being in current psychology. An analytic method of studying learning in the maze is devel- oped, one which may be applied to other simple types of learn- ing when the necessary controls are available. THE ALTERNATION PROBLEM A Preliminary Study HARVEY CARR University of Chicago INTRODUCTION In the discrimination experiment animals are required to choose between several paths according to some given temporal scheme. It is recognized that the animals may ignore the stimuli to be discriminated and solve the problem by reacting to this temporal order of presentation. This possibility is usually eliminated by several means: — 1. By instituting a se- quence of such complexity that the animals are unable to master it. 2. By varying the given temporal order after the problem is mastered; and 3, by removing the stimuli and requiring the animals to rely upon sequence alone. The control tests have almost invariably shown that the sequence factor is relatively insignificant in the solution of these problems. The ability of animals to master given sequences of position habits has not been adequately investigated. Such a problem presents several aspects of interest: — 1. The determination of the limits of complexity which a given animal can master. 2. The relative difficulty of sequences differing in kind and degree of complexity. 3. The possibility of discovering new aspects of the learning process. 4. The determination of the various con- ditions conducive to the development of such habits; and 5, the character of the sensori-motor mechanisms involved in such series of alternating habits. This paper reports the results of an experiment which was designed as a preliminary attack upon the above program. Before designing and constructing an apparatus especially adapted for this purpose, it was deemed advisable to test a group of animals upon a simple sequence. For this purpose we utilized a piece of apparatus which had been employed in the study of a particular phase of the discrimination problem. The essential features of this discrimination box are represented in fig. 1. The center consists of a 2' x 3' rectangular area. Open- 365 366 HARVEY CARR ing from this enclosure are two exits, |R" and L, each 4" x 4" in dimensions. These exits are separated from each other by a distance of 6", and they open into two runways, A and B, both of which lead to the food box F. These paths to the food box can be closed by means of two sliding doors situated at C and D. A group of eight white rats was tested upon a simple alter- nation between two positions habits. On each trial the animal was taken from the food box and placed by hand at the posi- tion marked by an arrow in the figure. Both position and B L R A Y • V Figure 1. — Plan of apparatus. R and L, two exits; A and B, two pathways; C and D, sliding doors; F, food; Arrow, position in which rats are placed in apparatus; X and Y, two positions at which rats were placed in control tests. body orientation were kept constant from trial to trial, the head of the animal being placed at the position of the arrow head equidistant from the two exits. On the first trial of each day the path leading from the exit R was left open, while the path from L was blocked. On the next trial L was opened and R blocked, and this procedure was repeated for each day" so that the order of presentation may be represented by the schema of R-L-R-L-R-L, etc. The number of trials per day was varied from two to eighteen according to the condition of the animal and the stage of learning. Progress in mastery was measured in terms of the percentage of correct choices, and a choice was termed correct whenever the proper door was entered sufficiently to secure a body orientation along the length of the passage THE ALTERNATION PROBLEM 367 way. The time devoted to a single run varied somewhat with the animal and the stage of mastery, but it became practically a constant after the first fifty trials. This time was determined for each animal for different stages of mastery. The average time per rat ranged from 21.5 to 25.5 seconds with a group average of 23. Of this time, 6.5 seconds were devoted to the run and 16.5 seconds to feeding and handling between runs. ANALYSIS OF THE LEARNING PROCESS All members of the group were able to master this simple alternation with a high degree of accuracy. A consistent record of 85% of correct choices for the group was obtained at the end of 600 trials. The number of trials per rat necessary to secure such a degree of proficiency ranged from 168 to 588, with a group average of 412. The number of trials for five of the eight animals closely approximated 450. Three graphs representing progress in mastery are given in fig 2. The group curve is represented by the solid line. In its general features it is similar to the usual learning curve. The distribution of choices between the two exits is at first a matter of chance as the initial record is 50% of correct choices. The initial trials are more effective than the later ones though the curve approximates a straight line more closely than does the typical learning curve. There is some indication of the existence of a plateau beginning at the 340th trial. This phe- nomenon is to some extent a group artefact, though four of the eight individual curves give some indication of a plateau in this region. The individual curves exhibit some pronounced differences. Four graphs exhibit a relatively rapid initial ascent followed by a period of slower progress. Only one of these, however, approximates the typical learning curve. The curves for three animals exhibit an approximately straight line ascent; progress is uniform for all stages of mastery. One curve is quite unusual in this respect as it descends rather rapidly for 200 trials, then rises abruptly, and this period of ascent is followed by the usual slow progress. This curve is represented by the broken line graph of fig. 2. The dotted line curve represents the case in which the initial trials are relatively the most effec- tive. These two individual curves represent the two extremes between which are to be found all degrees of gradation. 368 HARVEY CARR The animals were required in the initial trial of each day to choose the right exit in order to secure food. Alternation was the rule for the remaining trials of that day's test. Mastery of these initial trials thus represents a different type of problem from that involved in the subsequent alternation. For this reason separate records were kept of these initial trials and the results were plotted and the curve compared with that representing the mastery of the problem as a whole. 1. Mastery of this initial choice proved to be extremely difficult for the majority of the animals. Five rats consistently made poorer records for the first trial than for the whole day for all stages Trials |7Q Figure 2. — Curves of learning-. Solid line, group curve; broken lines, typical individual curves; curve from A to B, progress of group during period when control tests were given. of learning. Only one rat found the initial choice to be easy and reversed the above relation. 2. Seven of the eight animals made poorer records for the initial choice at the middle of the learning period than at the beginning. With one exception the curves for the initial choice exhibit a pronounced descent for the first stages of mastery. 3. With four animals progress in the mastery of the initial choice was correlated with the degree of success for the day, although these choices were the more difficult. In these cases the mastery of the problem as a whole was apparently dependent upon the ability of the animal to get the day's sequence started properly. With the remaining four animals, these two aspects of the problem were apparently not related. 4. All animals finally succeeded in mastering this THE ALTERNATION PROBLEM 369 initial choice with a high degree of perfection. Some typical examples of these curves are given in figures 3 and 4. The solid line 1 represents the curve of learning for the problem as a whole, while the dotted curve 2 represents the course of mastery of the initial choice. Fig. 4 represents the exceptional case in which the solution of the two aspects of the problem were related and equally difficult. In fig. 3 the initial choice exhibited the greater difficulty; for some periods the two aspects were mastered together, at other times progress was antagonistic, while for most periods one problem was mastered independently of the other. Tnals 170 Trials 170 Figure 3. — Graph 1, individual learning Figure 4. — Graph 1, individual learning curve; graph 2, curve of learning for curve; graph 2, curve of learning for mastery of initial choice. mastery of initial choice. Separate records were kept for the mastery of the two posi- tion habits. A comparison of the individual graphs reveals two general results. 1. Five animals found the mastery of the left position to be the easier. More correct choices of the left exit were consistently made for all stages of learning. The two positions were practically equally difficult for the other three animals. Mastery of the two habits was synchronous. 2. With four animals, the two habits antagonized each other's progress for the first half or two-thirds of the learning period. A rise in one curve was generally correlated with a fall in the other, 370 HARVEY CARR and vice versa. The mastery of one path was made at the expense of an increased number of wrong choices of the oppo- site path. In the final periods of learning, however, the two habits were brought up to the same degree of perfection and progressed together. In all four of these cases the left path proved to be the easier and was mastered first. The reverse situation obtained for the other four animals. Progress in one habit was almost invariably associated with progress in the other. The two curves were thus similar in form. Typical examples of these relations are represented in figures 5 and 6. Figure 5. — Graphs R and L, curves of Figure 6. — Graphs R and L curves, of mastery of the right and left exits re- mastery of the right and left exits re spectively. spectively. The graphs L and R represent the progressive mastery of the left and right paths respectively. In fig. 6 the two habits antag- onize each other's progress in the main, and the left position is the first to be mastered with any degree of perfection. In fig. 5 the two positions are mastered simultaneously, although the right habit maintained somewhat the higher degree of per- fection for most stages of development. During the solution of the problem, the animal may develop several modes of attack. 1. The rats may acquire a position preference, or they may distribute their choices equally between the two exits. A fixed preference for either of the two exits THE ALTERNATION PROBLEM 371 will give a percentage of 50 of correct choices and no improve- ment will be possible until the habit is broken. An equal dis- tribution of choices will give a score of 50% with no improve- ment so long as the choices are a matter of chance. When the alternation system is mastered, the choices will still be equally- distributed and a score of 100% will be attained. 2. The rats may develop the tendency either to repeat or alternate from the previous choice. An invariable repetition of the previous choice irrespective of whether it was correct or incorrect is equivalent to a position habit and it will give a score of 50% with no improvement. Alternation from the previous choice will give a score of zero if each day's initial choice was incor- rect, while a perfect score of 100% will be attained if each day's sequence gets started properly. 3. The rats may also develop the tendency either to repeat or to alternate from the previous exit that gave food. The repeating tendency will necessitate a wrong alternation with a score of zero. The alternating ten- dency will solve the problem and give a score of 100%. All possibilities thus reduce to two, the development of a position preference, or the acquisition of a habit of alternation and this alternating sequence of choices may or may not conform to the objective sequence. Our results were now analyzed and tabulated with the purpose of studying the development of these two tendencies. The relative number of R and L choices, irrespective of their correctness, was determined for the successive stages of learning. The group exhibited a slight preference for the R exit for the first 100 trials. A pronounced L preference was now developed and this persisted with some degree of strength until the 500th trial, after which point the choices were equally distributed between the two exits. The L exit was consistently chosen in two-thirds of the trials for a period of 200 trials. The develop- ment of the L preference was confined to five of the eight animals, while the other three rats maintained a practically neutral atti- tude towards the two exits throughout the entire period of learning. The L preference began to develop somewhere in the period from the 50th to the 170th trial and it persisted for a period of 300 to 600 trials. Four of the five animals at times chose the L exit in 80% of the trials. The development of this preference may be both advantageous and detrimental to the 372 HARVEY CARR mastery of the problem. It must certainly be detrimental in part because this habit must be broken before the problem can be mastered. The detrimental character of the habit is evident from the following facts. Each animal was ranked as to speed of learning. The three rats that developed no preference stood 1st, 2nd, and 6th in quickness of mastery. Among the five rats with a position preference those two which first eliminated this tendency were also the first to master the problem, while that animal which was the last to eliminate the tendency was also the last to complete the mastery of the problem. The existence of these position preferences explains the rela- tive speed of development of the two habits as previously de- scribed and illustrated in figures 5 and 6. The group of five animals that developed a preference for the left position con- tained the same individuals as the group that exhibited the greater progress in the mastery of the left path. The three animals that developed no position preference were the ones which mastered the two habits simultaneously. The distribu- tion of the total choices between the two exits was practically identical with the distribution of the correct choices alone; this relation holds for the records of the group and each of the indi- viduals. No matter how the total number of entrances are distributed between the R and L exits, the percentages of cor- rectness for each are practically the same. In case a rat chooses the left exit 80 times in a series of 100 trials when it has devel- oped an accuracy of 75%, the numbers of correct choices for the left and the right exits will be 60 and 15 respectively. The absence of a position preference will give 50 entrances for each of the exits in a series of 100 trials, and in this case the number of correct and successful responses will be equally distributed between the two paths. Since the percentage of successful responses is independent of the distribution of the choices, the number of correct choices of either exit must be a function of the frequency with which it is entered. In other words, the relative progression in the mastery of the two habits as illus- trated in figures 5 and 6 is almost wholly a function of the posi- tion preferences which have been developed. The rats may repeat or alternate from the previous choice and this alternation may or may not conform to the objective sequence. An analysis of the results reveals the following THE ALTERNATION PROBLEM 373 facts: — 1. The repetitions and the alternations are practically equal in number for the first 50 trials. Evidently no animal came to the problem with a preference for either mode of choice. 2. Three rats maintained this neutral attitude for 150 trials, and then rapidly developed a pronounced preference for the alternating mode of attack. One animal immediately developed a slight preference for alternation and maintained this attitude for 400 trials, relapsed into a neutral attitude, and then rapidly developed the habit of alternation. Three animals rapidly de- veloped a repeating preference for 300 to 400 trials, and then shifted quite rapidly to the opposite mode of attack. The re- maining animal first developed a slight preference for alternation, shifted to the repeating tendency for 100 trials, and then per- fected the habit of alternation in 300 trials. 3. The correctness of the choices due to repetition is a matter of chance. Each rat closely approximated a score of 50% of correct choices for every stage of learning. 4. The correctness of the choices due to alternation is at first a matter of chance. All rats approx- imated a score of 50% for the first 50 trials. Finally the rats learn to adapt their alternate choices to the objective series and approximate a score of 100% for this mode of attack. 5. Four rats rapidly learned the trick of adapting their alternate choices to the objective sequence. A score of 90% or better was at- tained in 150 to 250 trials. One of these individuals lost the trick for quite a long period and then remastered it. The other four animals at first increased their percentage of wrong alter- nations for 160 to 280 trials, and then quickly learned to adapt their choices to the objective series. 6. There is no correlation between initial ability to alternate and success in adapting this to the objective sequence. Of the four rats that immediately developed a preference for alternate choices, two succeeded in adapting these to the objective sequence and two did not. Of the four animals that decreased the initial number of alternate choices, two succeeded in adapting them to the given order of presentation and two did not. Our problem thus presents four distinct difficulties which must be mastered: — 1. The rat must learn to choose correctly the initial entrance for each day's trials. 2. The animal must learn to keep its choices equally distributed between the two exits, or, in other words, it must inhibit all tendency toward the 374 HARVEY CARR development of a position preference. 3. The animal must learn to alternate its choices, and 4, it must further master the trick of adapting these to the temporal order of presentation. The progressive mastery of the above aspects of the problem accounts for the peculiarities of the various curves of learning. An analysis of three typical learning curves into their four com- ponents will be given as illustrations. The dotted line curve of fig. 2 exhibits the most pronounced initial rise and this rat was the first to master the problem with any degree of perfection. This animal also made the most rapid progress in mastering the initial choice, developed no serious position preference, belonged to the group which made the greatest progress in learning the habit of alternation, and was the first to learn the trick of adapting its alternate choices to the objective sequence. Curve 1 of fig. 4 exhibits a rapid descent for 220 trials and this is followed by a normal rate of ascent until the problem was mastered. Likewise we find that the percentage of correct initial choices rapidly decreases for 250 trials and then increases at a normal rate. The animal also developed a position prefer- ence which reached its maximum strength at the 330th trial, and which was then quickly eliminated. The rat also developed a repeating preference up to the 390th trial, and then shifted very quickly over to the system of alternate choices. The per- centage of correctness of the alternate choices decreased for 220 trials, and the animal then began to learn to adapt these to the objective sequence. Curve 1 of fig 3 exhibits four aspects, an initial rise at the 100th trial, a pronounced fall at the 150th trial, a rapid rise to the 330th trial, and a subsequent plateau period. The cor- responding percentage record of the initial choices is represented by curve 2 of the same figure. The animal first succeeded in choosing correctly, then failed dismally, and again succeeded. This rat also exhibited for 150 trials a position preference which was then quickly eliminated. The rat made no progress in increasing the number of alternations for 150 trials, and then practically perfected the habit in 150 trials. The curve repre- senting the percentage of successful alternations is practically a replica of the learning curve of fig. 3. The most important aspect of the problem is the ability to THE ALTERNATION PROBLEM 375 adapt the alternation to the objective sequence. The curves representing the percentages of successful alternations approx- imate most closely to the learning curves. Next in order of importance is the ability to alternate. The success of the initial choice is the least important factor; this fact is readily comprehensible from two considerations. The number of initial choices constitutes a very small proportion of the total, and the ability to alternate successfully depends but little upon the success of the initial choice except after the problem is prac- tically mastered. NATURE OF THE CO-ORDINATION Each of the two alternating habits consists of an association between a movement and a certain stimulus. The two stimuli must fulfill at least one requirement; they must be presented in a given temporal order. Four possibilities exist: — 1. The ani- mals may be reacting in a differential manner to the two acts of adjusting the sliding doors, or to two different sensory condi- tions resulting from the adjustment. 2. They may be reacting to two different ways in which they are handled and placed in the starting position. 3. Each movement may be aroused by the cutaneous and kinaesthetic stimuli resulting from the pre- vious act. This hypothesis assumes that the two acts are functionally related to each other in much the same way as are the two leg movements in locomotion. 4. The rats may be reacting to two different motor attitudes maintained during the act of feeding. The arrangement of the apparatus was such that the animals were forced to alternate between two opposite directions of approach to the food. It is possible that the body orientation involved in approach may be continued during the act of feeding, and hence that each run is preceded by a distinctive motor attitude toward the food. The first possibility was eliminated by instituting tests in which both sliding doors were left open; in other words the rats were forced to react when the usual acts of adjustment were omitted. Again the doors were adjusted only after the choice of exits was made. Such control conditions did not decrease the percentage of correct responses. The second possibility was tested in several ways. 1. The rats were placed in the box as usual with the exception that 376 HARVEY CARR the head was placed at X when a choice of the left exit was demanded and at Y when the right exit constituted the correct response. The animals were thus compelled to start from two distinctive positions of such a character that a correct response necessitated a diagonal course from each position to the appro- priate exit. The percentage of correct choices for the group under these conditions is represented at A in the graph of fig. 7. 2. The rats were now placed at the two positions, X and Y, in such a manner that a correct choice necessitated a direct course to the proper exit. The percentage result for the group is represented by B in the curve. 3. The animals were handled and placed in the usual position by Dr. Vincent. These results are represented in the curve at the points C. 4. The animals were subjected to normal conditions when the left opening Figure 7. — Group curve representing the effect of the introduction of control tests. constituted the correct choice, but whenever the right exit was to be chosen the animals were given a body orientation with the head pointing toward the right instead of to the left as under normal conditions. This orientation of the animal compelled the experimenter to place the rats in position with the left hand. The two choices are thus preceded by two distinctive methods of handling and two different orientations of the body. The results from this test are represented at the points D. 5. The rats were invariably given a head orientation toward the right instead of to the left as with normal conditions. This procedure involved a new method of handling and a new method of turning in starting for the exits. The results of the test are represented at the points E. Tests for normal conditions were interpolated among these control experiments. The records secured for these normal conditions are represented in the graph at those points not marked THE ALTERNATION PROBLEM 377 by letters. The value for each point of the curve represents the percentage of correct choices for the group out of 224 trials. The following conclusions may be derived from the results of these control tests. 1. The introduction of the novel con- ditions decreased the number of correct choices for the group by 10%. 2. The alterations did not disturb two of the eight animals. The percentage of correct choices of the rat manifest- ing the greatest disturbance was lowered from 91 to 75%. No animal fell below a record of 75%. 3. The most disturbing conditions were those in which the animals were handled by strange hands and in which they were subjected to a new body orientation in starting. 4. The rats quickly adapt to these novel conditions. This fact is evident from an inspection of the graph. 5. The interpolation of these novel conditions in- terfered little, if any, with the progressive perfection of the two habits. At the beginning of the tests the animals had just attained a consistent group average of 85% of correct choices. At the end of the tests a record of 95% was secured. An im- provement of 10% was thus attained during the period in which the tests were given. The perfection of the two habits during this period relative to the progress attained during the previous learning period is represented by the solid line graph of fig. 2. The curve up to the point A represents the progress attained during the learning period. The part of the curve between A and B represents the records secured from the tests for normal conditions which were interpolated among the various control experiments. The rate of progress during the control period is somewhat less than that obtaining for the period of learning. It is impossible to assert, however, that this decreased rate of learning is due to the introduction of the controls. 6. As pre- viously noted the animals experienced difficulty in mastering the initial choice for each day's trials. This fact indicates that the animals were not relying exclusively upon sensory data derived from the mode of handling or the position in which they were placed in the apparatus. If such stimuli were effica- cious, the first choice should have been no more difficult than the subsequent ones. The above results prove rather conclusively that the animals did not rely exclusively upon the second class of stimuli. Neither 378 HARVEY CARR does the slight decrease in efficiency resulting from the altered conditions prove that the rats are relying upon these stimuli in part, for any alteration of the subordinate and supplementary sensory environment may produce disturbances as readily as those aspects which are utilized as guides and controls. In other words, these altered conditions may have operated merely as sensory distractions. There are several considerations which indicate the truth of this hypothesis. The rapid adjustment to these changes is readily interpreted on this basis. The relatively poor records secured by the second experimenter were evidently due to fear. This emotional reaction was quite evident in the animal's behavior. The hypothesis is further supported by the fact that these changes did not materially effect the rate of progress in the final perfection of the habits. The animals usually did assume and maintain a bodily orien- tation during feeding resulting from and characteristic of their direction of approach to the food box. However constancy of motor attitude was not the invariable rule. No attempt was made to control this factor nor were systematic records of bodily orientation taken. We are thus forced to the conclusion that the controlling and guiding stimulus to each choice consists either of the sensory aspects of the alternate act or of a motor attitude resulting from that act. EFFECT OF INCREASING THE TIME INTERVAL During the mastery of the problem, a period of 16.5 seconds was devoted to feeding and handling between runs. After the perfection of the association, this time interval between the two acts was gradually increased in order to determine whether the ability of the animals to make correct choices was dependent upon the length of this interval. The results of this experiment are graphically represented by curve 1 of fig. 8. The percentages of correct choices are repre- sented by the ordinate values while the various time intervals in seconds are distributed along the abscissa. The first four percentage values were secured for the normal time interval of 16.5 sec. All percentage values for the periods of 16.5 and 44 seconds inclusive are based upon a total of 224 trials. As the time interval is increased, the animals are given a greater oppor- tunity for feeding, and necessarily fewer trials per day can be THE ALTERNATION PROBLEM 379 given. As a consequence the percentage values for the inter- vals of 50 to 95 seconds are based upon a total of 48 trials each. The following results are apparent from an inspection of the graph. 1. A gradual increase of the interval from 16.5 to 50 sec. exerts but little effect upon the accuracy of the act. The lowest record of correct choices for any animal for two succes- sive days' trials was 82%. Six of the animals were able to make a record of 100% for a similar number of trials. 2. An increase of the interval up to 44 sec. did not disturb the accuracy of the act for normal conditions. A test for the normal time interval was interpolated after the group was given the 44 sec. interval. A group record of 96.5% was secured for a total of 288 trials. 95 120 150 Figure 8.— Graph 1, percentage of correct choices for group with increasing time intervals. Graph 2, percentage of correct choices for group for large time intervals and the introduction of new conditions during the delay. This value is not represented in the curve. 3. The number of correct choices suffers after a period of one minute is reached. This drop in the percentage values for the longer time intervals is not due to a diminished hunger motive as the number of trials per day was decreased from fourteen to six. The introduction of the longer intervals decreased the percentage values for the group about 10%. The lowest individual percentage record for the eighteen trials devoted to the three large intervals was 80, while the highest was 100. The decrease in the values was limited to five of the eight rats. The experiment was continued with somewhat different con- ditions. After each trial the rats were allowed a few bites of food and then were placed upon an adjacent table. At the 380 HARVEY CARR expiration of the given time interval, they were again placed in the apparatus for the succeeding trial. These conditions are radically different from those under which the problem was mastered. With the previous conditions the animals devoted themselves during the period of delay to the act of eating and they usually maintained a relatively constant position. On the table the rats were free to run around and react to whatever stimuli that may attract their attention. The purpose of the experiment was twofold. 1. We wished to determine the de- pendence of the choices upon the activities obtaining during the period of delay. To this end, we repeated the tests for the intervals of 50, 75 and 95 seconds. 2. We wished to continue the experiment with larger time intervals than the previous conditions permitted. With the new conditions the usual num- ber of trials per day can be given even though very large time intervals are employed. The results secured for these conditions are represented by curve 2 of fig. 8. The percentage value for the interval of 50 sec. is based upon a total of 1070 trials. The remaining values are each based upon a total of 100 trials. The following conclusions have been derived from these data. 1. The intro- duction of the novel conditions during the delay has decreased the percentage of correct choices by about 27%. The validity of this conclusion is readily apparent from a comparison of the two curves of fig. 8. 2. All of the animals were able to approx- imate a record of 70% of correct choices for the interval of 50 sec. 3. No improvement was manifested for the 50 sec. interval although the rats were tested daily for a period of 15 days. 4. The co-ordination was again disrupted for intervals greater than 50 seconds. The similarity of the two curves for the intervals of 50 to 95 seconds is striking. This fact indicates that the 60 sec. interval is a critical point. 5. Further increases beyond 75 sec. seem to be without effect. 6. The larger time intervals did not wholly destroy the functional efficiency of the co-ordinations for six of the eight animals. The group averages for these larger intervals are all at least 60%. Two rats made records of but 51 and 52% for the four large intervals. The percentage records of the remaining animals are at least 60%. The highest record was 70% and this score was made by two rats. Since these values are based upon a total of 52 trials THE ALTERNATION PROBLEM 381 for each rat, it is probable that some of these scores are signifi- cant. 7. The introduction of the long delays has tended to disrupt the act for the shorter intervals. The rats were finally tested again for the 50 sec. interval. Much poorer records were obtained than for the initial tests. The group record was de- creased by 10%. Only four of the animals were now able to choose correctly for a score of 67% or better. The experiment permits of the following general conclusions. 1. The guiding and controlling stimulus to each choice is consti- tuted in part by the sensory aspects of the preceding act. A certain percentage of correct responses was obtained when all possibility of distinctive motor attitudes during the delay was wholly eliminated. Furthermore, any increase of the time interval beyond 60 sec. decreased the percentage of correct responses. 2. The rat may thus establish an associative nexus between a sensory stimulus and an act which are separated by a time interval of 16.5 sec, provided that relatively constant conditions exist during this period. 3. When an association has been established for a period of 16.5 sec, approximately one minute is the maximum time of separation of the stimulus and the response that may be obtained without disturbing their functional relation. 4. The functional efficiency of the co- ordination depends in large part upon the stability of the con- ditions that obtained for the period of delay. This fact sup- ports the hypothesis that the guiding stimulus to each choice is constituted to a large extent by a distinctive motor attitude resulting from the previous act. The proof is not at all con- clusive, however, for it is entirely possible to assume that the disruption of the act was due to the distractive influences of the novel sensori-motor conditions. 5. The efficacy of motor attitudes in the solution of the problem is indicated by the following facts. The relative disturbing effects of an increase of the time interval and the introduction of new conditions during the delay differ with animals. One may infer that some animals rely mainly upon the sensory aspects of the previous act as guides to conduct while other animals rely mainly upon motor attitudes. It is logical to suppose that those animals that place their chief reliance upon motor attitudes will learn the problem with the least effort because of the closer temporal contiguity of the stimulus and the response. As a matter of 382 HARVEY CARR fact a positive correlation of .60 obtains between the ability to master the problem and the degree of disturbance due to the introduction of novel conditions during the interval of delay. In other words, those rats that rely mainly upon motor atti- tudes learn quickly and display the most disturbance when these motor attitudes are altered. On the other hand a negative correlation of .48 obtains between speed of learning and the degree of disturbance due to an increase of the time interval. Those rats that rely mainly upon the sensory aspects of the previous act in the solution of the problem are relatively slow learners and exhibit the greatest disturbance when this time interval between the stimulus and the response is increased. FUNCTION OF VISION The group of eight rats contained three blind animals. The records of the two groups were compared. The individual records are so variable and the numbers in each group are so few that it is impossible to make assertions with any degree of confidence. In general the group differences that exist are so small that they may well be due to chance or individual differ- ences. Consequently the data as given justify the following negative conclusions. 1. The presence of vision did not influence the rate of learning. 2. No differences in the type of curve were apparent. 3. There were no manifest differences as to the interrelation of the R and the L habits. 4. No assertions can be made as to any differences of ability in mastering the initial choice for each day, or as to the relation between this choice and the day's success. 5. No differences were manifested in the mode of attack, or the ability to adapt the alternate choices to the objective sequence. 6. The groups did not differ as to the relative reliance which they placed upon the two sets of guiding stimuli. 7. No assertions can be made as to any differ- ences of ability in solving the problem of increasing intervals of delay. It is of course possible that some of the above con- clusions will need revision provided larger groups of animals are tested. Two differences were detected. 1. The blind animals were somewhat the slower in movement and expended more time in making each run. The average time values per run were 6 and 7.2 seconds for the normal and the blind animals respec- THE ALTERNATION PROBLEM 383 tively. 2. In the later stages of mastery, the normal rats fre- quently turned immediately after entering the blocked path. The blind rats did not manifest this type of behavior. When wrong choices were made, the blind animals did not correct their mistake until actual contact with the closed door was effected. This differential behavior indicates that the normal animals frequently used visual data in reacting to a blocked pathway. SUMMARY All rats succeeded in learning to make alternate choices be- tween two exits. The problem proved to be rather difficult for these animals. The problem is a complex one consisting of four components which are stated in their order of importance. 1. The rat must learn to adapt its alternate choices to the given order of pre- sentation. 2. The system of making alternate choices must be acquired. 3. The rat must resist the tendency of developing a position preference. 4. There is the final difficulty of choosing correctly in the initial trial of each day's test, — of getting the day's sequence started correctly. These four aspects of the problem constitute to some extent independent difficulties in the early stages of mastery; progress in mastering one component does not necessarily depend upon the animal's ability to overcome the other difficulties. The four factors were mutually related in the case of some individuals, but there is no necessary dependence inasmuch as they were unrelated with some animals. Animals differ greatly in their rate of progress in mastering each of these component elements of the problem. The curve of learning for the problem as a whole may be regarded as a combination of the four curves representing the mastery of the four components. The complexity of the problem, the inde- pendence of its parts, and the variability of the animals in mastering each part make possible a wide range of individual differences in rate and method of learning. The final co-ordination consists of an association between each act and the sensory aspects of the preceding act as well as a distinctive motor attitude resulting from the same. The relative efficiency of the two stimuli in determining each choice varies with the individual. The problem was mastered quickest 384 HARVEY CARR by those animals that relied mainly upon the factor of motor attitudes in making their choices. This fact suggests the hypo- thesis that the speed of learning is to some extent a function of the degree of temporal contiguity between the terms to be associated. Since the animals relied in part upon the sensory aspects of the preceding act, we are forced to conclude that a rat can establish an associative nexus between a stimulus and a response separated by a time interval of 16.5 seconds, provided that relatively constant sensori-motor conditions prevail during that interval. The rate and mode of learning are apparently not dependent upon vision. Rats with vision exhibited the greater speed of movement and occasionally corrected their wrong choices in terms of visual stimuli from the closed doors. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOR Vol. 7 NOVEMBER-DECEMBER No. 6 THE BEHAVIOR OF LIMPETS WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE HOMING INSTINCT MORRIS M. WELLS University of Chicago INTRODUCTION More than casual interest attaches to the behavior of animals that possess marked homing ability and it is of importance that the detailed behavior of such forms be recorded. Certain investigators have maintained that homing is a type of behavior set apart from the ordinary reactions of animals and in an attempt to explain the homing ability have hypothecated a sixth sense or some even less demonstrable factor. No morpho- logical foundation for such hypotheses seems discoverable and we must, therefore, look to a detailed examination into the behavior of homing animals for an explanation of the homing instinct. We need not, I believe, look for this explanation to result from some startling discovery, but rather, expect it to emerge from an apparent hodge-podge of miscellaneous facts relating to animal behavior. It is not likely that the homing instinct is peculiar to any particular type of organism but it is rather inherent in all protoplasm. In the process of evolu- tion certain groups of animals seem to have developed the homing ability to a higher degree than have other groups, but this is true for all other types of animal behavior. In the so- called homing species, the variations in the ability of the indi- viduals to home are so marked and the instances of homing behavior in so-called non-homing species are so numerous, that one cannot but believe that animals differ quantitatively rather than qualitatively in the possession of this instinct. 387 388 MORRIS M. WELLS Among the invertebrate forms, the limpets are particularly interesting in connection with investigations of the homing instinct. These animals possess none but the simpler types of sense organs yet show marked ability in finding their way back, at regular intervals, to a given resting place or " home." The observations herein recorded possess only passing biological interest when taken singly but it is felt that as a whole they may be of some assistance to other observers who are interested in limpets and their homing behavior. They were made, during the winter of 1915, at which time the author was staying at the Scripps Institution for Biological Research, which institu- tion is located at Lajolla, California. PRESENTATION OF DATA The rocks, on the beach to the north of the Scripps labora- tory, are thickly populated with limpets belonging to three genera and to at least six species. The genus Acmea is repre- sented by the species patina, persona, scabra, and spectrum. The two other genera are Lottia and Fisurella; of these genera one species each is common, namely, L. gigantea and F. volcano. 1. Distribution of the limpets. — The limpets show marked generic and specific differences in their distribution on the beach. The most common species is Acmea scabra, which occurs in great numbers on all the rocks of the high and middle beach. The other species of Acmea are not so numerous nor so widely distributed as scabra. A. patina and A. persona are found with scabra on the middle beach while A. spectrum is usually more abundant on the lower beach. Lottia gigantea occurs only in situations exposed to the main force of the waves. Specimens of Fisurella volcano were frequently collected from the kelp- covered rocks that are barely exposed at low tide. A large per cent of such specimens were living in the hollow halves of the deserted bivalve shells that are firmly cemented to these rocks. 2. General behavior of the limpets. — The movements of the limpets are largely controlled by the tides. When the tide is out, they remain practically motionless on the rocks and present no visible sign of life. With the first dash of spray from the incoming tide they begin to move and are apparently active until the water recedes once more. THE BEHAVIOR OF LIMPETS 389 3. The clinging of the limpets. — Limpets are completely help- less when removed from the rocks. If dropped into still water, they invariably fall with the shell side down and unless righted by some external force will remain in this position, perfectly helpless, until dead. Individuals dropped into an aquarium at first made attempts to right themselves by stretching the foot up out of the shell. They were unable to turn over, how- ever, and after 48 hours, all were dead. This helplessness when detached, suggests that the marked ability to survive and multiply, which limpets possess, must be accompanied by an ability to prevent themselves ever being detached. To ascertain with what force they cling to the rocks, a pair of miniature, three-clawed tongs was made from large fish hooks, and employed in pulling the animals from their attachments. The sharpened points of the claws of the tongs were hammered into knife edges so that they could be easily inserted under the edges of the limpets' shells. With the limpet attached to the rock the tongs were adjusted in such a manner, that the animal could be lifted directly from its resting place by a pull, perpendicular to the rock's surface. A spring balance, that had previously been calibrated, was hooked into the eye ends of the tongs and a steady pull detached the limpet from the rock. By noting the figure reached by the indicator of the scale just as the limpet left the rock, the pull necessary to overcome the attachment of the limpet's foot was determined. Limpets of various sizes and species were tested with the following results. No marked specific differences in clinging power were observed, the recorded differences being directly correlated with the area of the foot of the individual. The figures show a variation from 5 lbs., the force required to detach the smallest limpet tested, to 48 lbs. for the largest. The foot of the smallest animal was 2.2 cm. long and 1.8 cm. wide, while that of the largest was 4.3 cm. by 3.2 cm. It was noted that the limpets need not be attached to a smooth surface, but rather the contrary, if they are to display their best clinging ability. Limpets that were attached to barnacle covered rocks seemed to cling with fully as much force as those attached to the fairly smooth, but wave eroded, rock surface. When limpets were pulled from barnacle encrusted rocks, the barnacles with which the foot of the animal was 390 MORRIS M. WELLS in contact were frequently detached with the limpet and re- mained attached to its foot. In many instances, the limpets were attached to the barnacle covered rocks in such a way that one could actually see daylight between the rather loosely set barnacle shells under the animal's foot. Even in these cases, the pull required to detach the limpet was very little if any less, than that required for the other situations and usually the limpet did not leave the rock, without bringing the barnacle cases with it. On the other hand, limpets pulled from glass plates came off with the application of about one-half the force necessary to detach them from the rocks. Calculations, based upon the clinging power of the limpets, indicate that the large Abalones (another gastropod mollusc much larger than the limpets) that are numerous along the coast of southern Cali- fornia can cling with a power equal to 1100 pounds weight. One who has attempted to pull them from the rocks may well credit them with this great adhesive power. 4. Reaction of limpets to environmental factors. — A large num- ber of readings was taken as to the position which the limpets assume on the rocks, in relation to the current made by the waves, to the pull of gravity, and to the direction of the sun's rays. The readings were taken daily for three weeks. The following table summarizes the results. Reaction to — Positive Negative Indifferent Current 450-51% 321-36% 117-13% Gravity 334-54% 203-33% 73-13% Light 285-37% 266-36% 199-27% The figures indicate a strong positive reaction to current and gravity but none to the light. It is readily noted that limpets do not occupy the sunny sides of rocks but this is probably a negative reaction to temperature rather than to light. Experi- ments with light gradients will probably indicate a selection of a medium light upon the part of these limpets. In the above experiments the reaction was to direction of rays rather than to intensity since the orientation of the animals, i.e., whether fa- cing toward or away from the sun, were the only data recorded. 5. The homing instinct. — Observations, continuing in some cases for a little over a month, were carried on, to determine the daily relation of the different species of limpets to a given resting place on the rocks. The idea was, first, to determine whether or not any or all of the species possessed a definite THE BEHAVIOR OF LIMPETS 391 homing ability, and second, to ascertain something as to the nature of such ability should it be present. All of the limpets under observation were found to move about, at periods of high tide only. The movement began with the first wetting from the incoming tide, and proceeded more or less continuously, till the retreating water left the animals high and dry once more. About 30 limpets, representing four species of Acmea and the one species of Lottia, were marked by filing Roman numerals into their shells. This method made it necessary to mark the animals but once, for the grooves could be filed quite deep into the shells without injuring the animals in the least. The limpets were chosen, so that all the possible situations were represented. Some were on horizontal rocks, some on vertical ledges; some were exposed, some were not, etc. The spot on which the limpet was resting, on the first day of obser- vation, was enclosed in a small rectangle scratched into the rock and alongside this rectangle the roman number which the limpet carried was also filed into the rock. From day to day the location of each limpet was determined by referring it back to this numbered rectangle. The daily positions were plotted on squared paper and the resulting graph, together with the field notes, constitutes the permanent record of the limpet's activities. The graphs that follow will furnish an idea of the behavior of the different species of Acmea, during the period of observation. Figure 1 indicates the wanderings of an individual of the species Acmea spectrum, during a period of 27 days. It is at once evident that this animal did not habitually return to any given spot on the rock, when the tide retreated. It will be noted further that there was even a tendency to change locali- ties. This individual was situated on a flat rock, where the waves washed it much of the time. The readings represented in Figure 1 were taken but once a day and it soon became obvious that there was considerable to be learned by observations made at more frequent intervals. To check up this point a number of days was spent taking hourly observations upon individual limpets. Figure 1A shows the result of hourly readings upon the individual referred to in Figure 1. Figure 1A, from its appearance, might represent a series of 5 consecutive readings taken from some part of Fig. 1, 392 MORRIS M. WELLS - lOA.M. i II-" 4-r.rf, IZM. '3 P.rA. '5 PM i<<\ i h FIG. 1. — Graph of the movements of a non-homing individual of Acmea spectrum. Observations made once a day for 27 daj's. Fig. lA.-Graph of the movements of the limpet whose path is shown in Fig. 1. The movements shown in Fig. 1a took place on the 15th day. Read- ings hourly. yet it is actually part of the path travelled between the 15th and 16th readings. It is evident that the limpets move about a great deal more than the graph (Fig. 1) would lead us to believe. However, the fact remains that this partictilar limpet showed no signs of homing, during the period of observation. Figure 2 indicates the behavior of another individual of Acmea spectrum; this individual was situated upon the same flat rock with the individual discussed above and several times the two animals were but a few inches apart. Figure 2, however, shows a very different type of behavior from that indicated in Fig. 1. The limpet, whose path is traced in Fig. 2, shows a marked tendency to return to some particular spot, after its daily wan- THE BEHAVIOR OF LIMPETS 393 ^ i p.m, 2 P.M. 3 " " 10 A.M. 4 ,. it ii •• •■■ 5 .. » 12/ Mr f' HARVEY CARR University of Chicago The preface states that the book was written to present a brief account of the modes of procedure of animal psychology, its aims, trend and the general nature of the results obtained. Animal psychology concerns the systematic or experimental in- vestigation of the brute mind. The first chapter is entitled Protozoan Behavior. The varia- bility or trial and error characteristic of primitive behavior is emphasized while the evidence in favor of retentiveness in these lower forms is not regarded as conclusive. Physiological or motor retentiveness evident in habit formation is discussed in the succeeding chapter. The author presents a good analysis and summary of the more important work on the maze or laby- rinth problem. The third chapter is entitled Associative Memory and Sen- sory Discrimination. Associative memory refers to the deriva- tion by an object of a meaning or significance in virtue of its associative nexus with other activities. It is discussed as a criterion of mind, and its utility in studying discrimination and in testing the strength of a habit or instinct is noted. The larger part of the chapter is devoted to a review of the typical experiments on discrimination. The following chapter on instinct discusses such topics as their initial imperfection, the generalized character of the stim- ulus, modifiability, periodicity, deferred instincts, etc. Instinct is identified more with the impulse than with the resultant acts. Instinct achieves certain results but the acts or means may vary. A unity of purpose runs throughout the series of acts. Instinct is thus not a mere chain of reflexes nor can it be explain- ed except with difficulty in terms of reflexes and tropisms. The particular instinct of homing is the topic of Chapter V. Homing 1 The Investigation of Mind in Animals. By E. M. Smith. Cambridge, 1915, pp. lx+194. 449 450 HARVEY CARR is based upon an innate impulse to regain home, which must be supplemented by experience to achieve its end. The discussion is concerned primarily with the experimental factor and the factual material has been taken mainfy from the work on ants, bees and wasps. There is no general instinct for imitation, though some imita- tive acts may be termed instinctive. There is a good review of the literature on imitation in the higher animals. The author concludes: "That while under certain circumstances monkeys may, and do, imitate, their behavior as a whole can scarcely be characterized as imitative; nor does imitation appear to play any important part in their learning processes." The final chapter is entitled The Evidence for Intelligence and for Ideas. It presents a critical analysis of the main experi- ments and arguments in favor of the existence of ideas and images in animals and the author concludes with the following statement: " Reviewing our evidence we may say that, it is by no means disproved that animals are intelligent and have ' ideas,' but, save possibly for the single exception of Hunter's method of ' delayed reactions,' no test as yet applied, com- pletely excludes the possibility that animal learning is anything more than a process of association on the perceptuo-motor level." The treatment does not pretend to be exhaustive. Techni- calities and controversial questions have been omitted. The work is based almost wholly on experimental data; it reflects wide reading, clear analysis of the factual data and an orthodox judgment as to conclusions and interpretations. This book is well adapted to introduce and orient the general reader to the subject, and it may well serve as a text for the more elementary classes. WOOD'S " THE FUNDUS OCULI OF BIRDS "» R. M. STRONG Vanderbilt University This handsome monograph is a useful addition to the litera- ture of sense organs as well as to ornithology. It gives elaborate and extensively illustrated descriptions of the gross and micro- scopic structure of certain eye structures for a considerable number of birds. It is especially satisfactory to have such full accounts of the peculiar eye structures of birds, and a morpho- logical basis is furnished for much needed experimental work on bird vision. Besides the sections on methods, material, etc., there are the following chapters : 4. A Review of the Anatomy and Physiology of the Organs and Tissues seen in the Fundus Oculi of Birds; 6. Ophthalmoscopy of Birds; 7. Macroscopic Appearance of the Fundus Oculi of Birds in Prepared Specimens; 8. Photography of the Fundus in Prepared Eyeballs; 9. Effects of Domestica- tion on the Fundus Oculi of Wild Species ; 10. The Ophthalmo- scopic and Macroscopic Appearance of the Fundus Oculi in Various Orders of Birds; 11. Classification of the Ocular Fundi of Birds; 12. The Ocular Fundus of Birds in its Relation to a Classification of Aves; 13. Relation of Reptilian to Avian Fundi. The text figures are well executed and the numerous colored plates are beautifully done. The text print is good. Dr. Wood has been generous in financing the work himself. This interest of a clinician in the pure science bearings of his specialty deserves hearty commendation. 1 The Fundus Oculi of Birds, Especially as Viewed by the Ophthalmoscope: A Study in Comparative Anatomy and Physiology. By Casey Albert Wood, M.D. Chicago, The Lakeside Press, 1917; 200 pp., 145 text figures and 60 colored plates. 451 HOLMES'S "ANIMAL BEHAVIOR"1 HARVEY CARR University of Chicago The initial chapter contains an excellent account of the his- tory of thought concerning animal intelligence from the time of Aristotle to the modern experimental movement. Then follows a sketch of the evolution of parental care. It develops from reproduction and the first stage involves the selection of a proper environment for the egg. An added step is found in the instinct to store food for the young. Active care for the egg is the next step and this interest in the egg is extended to the young. Parental care is a necessary condition for the development of the family, organized society, altruism, etc. Three chapters are devoted to tropisms. Much illustrative material is given. The author accepts Loeb's reflex theory of orientation for the more primitive organisms, but trial and error is regarded as the predominant mode of adjustment. There is given an excellent sketch of the factors conditioning the reversals of tropisms and of the proposed theories of explanation. Three chapters are devoted to intelligence and learning. Associative memory is the criterion of intelligence. Intelligence is derived from the instinctive activities and is not found among the Protozoa. Trial and error is the method of intelligent adap- tation. The views of Spencer, Bain and Thorndike on the mechanism of selection are extensively criticised; the principle of congruity of responses is adopted. The primary acts mediate stimuli which excite secondary responses that in turn may either reinforce or interfere with the former. Selection and elimina- tion are the resultants respectively of this reinforcement and interference. The author emphasizes the point that intelligent adaptiveness presupposes some degree of prior adaptiveness and this primary ingredient of purposive responsiveness is found in the congenital activities; in other words intelligence is neces- sarily a derivative of instinct. 1 Studies in Animal Behavior. By S. J. Holmes, Badger, Boston, 1916, 266 pp. 452 HOLMES'S "ANIMAL BEHAVIOR" 453 Two chapters are devoted to the relation of form and behavior. Reviewing his own experiments in conjunction with those of Child, he concludes that the behavior of an organism plays but a subordinate though important r61e in the determination of its form. Under the title of Behavior of Cells the activity of many migratory and motile cells is cited. It is suggested that these activities are important in the development of form. The chapter on Death Feigning describes the wide distribu- tion of this instinct. There are two types, — the cataleptic and the paralytic. The former originated from the thigmotactic response, while the fear hypothesis can apply only to the latter. The author discusses the sensory basis of sex recognition for various species. Pie emphasizes the factor of behavior in many forms. The sense used varies with the animal, while many senses may be employed in the higher forms. The fact of sex is im- portant in the evolution of mind. Given asexual reproduction, mental evolution would have been different from what it was. For example, voice, — the instrument of language, functioned primarily as a sex call. The final chapter describes some experiments on a monkey. The technique and the conclusions are similar to those of most studies on this animal. In the preface we are told that the present volume is largely devoted to subjects with which the writer's own investigations in animal behavior have been more or less closely concerned. This fact explains the choice of topics and the organization of the book. It was probably intended more for supplementary reading than as a text. Naturally the biological aspects of behavior have been emphasized. STORY OF GRANNY, THE MOUNTAIN SQUIRREL CHARLES D. WALCOTT Smithsonian Institution When collecting fossils around the west slope of the south ridge of Mount Wapta in 1911 rock squirrels began to come to the quarry we were opening. At lunch time we threw them bits of bread and crackers, and later carried up nuts to give them. They became very tame, and when we returned the following year (1912) one of them that we named Granny, because she apparently had two generations of young squirrels that came with her, would run up on our legs and shoulders, and if we did not promptly give her something to eat she would give a sharp chirp to call attention. One rainy day when crouched under a rubber blanket at lunch time, Granny came and seeing a cake of chocolate lying on my knee made a grab for it, run- ning up my arm and over my shoulder so as to jump to the rocks behind. I made a grab for her, catching her by the end of the tail, which resulted in the snapping of her tail about midway. The following year (1913) she was about again as usual, being easily recognized by her stub tail. We did not visit the quarry from 1913 until the latter part of July, 1917. Just after a blast had been fired, which was the signal to the squirrels that we were about to eat lunch, we saw two or three of them coming down from the cliffs above. When eating luncheon, Granny suddenly appeared at the edge of the quarry. I called her, " Granny," and whistled as we had in the years before. She immediately ran across the floor of the quarry, jumped up on my foot and ran up my leg, finally sitting up and begging for something to eat as she had done in 1913. There were three strange persons in the quarry, and she would not go near them for several days until she had had opportunity of getting acquainted. The striking feature of this incident is that this mountain squirrel should have remembered through a period of four years and at once ran and jumped up on me as she had been accustomed to doing previously. 454 GRANNY, THE MOUNTAIN SQUIRREL 455 Four other squirrels came, two of which were evidently full grown and a year or more old, and two young ones. As Granny disciplined them all when they became too familiar, we supposed that they were members of her immediate family. After a week or more, Granny became very intimate with Mrs. Walcott and would jump into her lap and onto her shoul- ders, begging for food. She was entirely fearless, and would cling to a nut or a bit of chocolate and swing in the air until she secured the coveted bit. When the squirrels first came, they were very thin and ex- tremely active. After a month of feeding, Granny became so stout that she had great difficulty in jumping from rock to rock. Chocolate, nuts, bread and cookies seemed to agree with her, and the day we left the quarry a bountiful supply was placed under ledges of rock, so that they could all take it to their nests which were at the base of the cliffs, about 8,000 feet altitude. ANNOUNCEMENT TO SUBSCRIBERS The Board of Editors has decided to discontinue publication of the Journal of Animal Behavior until the unfavorable con- ditions created bv the war shall have ceased to exist. H 1 SL V.