(ISSN 0161-8202) .kb6i “ Journal of ARACHNOLOGY PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 44 2016 NUMBER 2 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: Robert B. Suter, Vassar College MANAGING EDITOR: Richard S. Vetter, University of Califomia-Riverside SUBJECT EDITORS: Ecology — Martin Entling, University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany; Systematics — Mark Harvey, Western Australian Museum and Michael Rix, Queensland Museum, Australia; Behavior — Elizabeth Ja¬ kob, University of Massachusetts Amherst; Morphology and Physiology — Peter Michalik, Ernst Moritz Arndt Uni¬ versity Greifswald, Germany EDITORIAL BOARD: Alan Cady, Miami University (Ohio); Jonathan Coddington, Smithsonian Institution; William Eberhard, Universidad de Costa Rica; Rosemary Gillespie, University of California, Berkeley; Charles Griswold, California Academy of Sciences; Marshal Hedin, San Diego State University; Marie Herberstein, Macquarie University; Yael Lubin, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Brent Opell, Virginia Polytechnic Insti¬ tute & State University; Ann Rypstra, Miami University (Ohio); William Shear, Hampden-Sydney College; Jef¬ frey Shultz, University of Maryland; Petra Sierwald, Field Museum; Seren Toft, Aarhus University; I-Min Tso, Tunghai University (Taiwan). The Journal of Arachnology (ISSN 0161-8202), a publication devoted to the study of Arachnida, is published three times each year by The American Arachnological Society. Memberships (yearly): Membership is open to all those interested in Arachnida. A subscription to the Journal of Arachnology and annual meeting notices are included with membership in the Society. Regular, $55; Students, $30; Institutional, $125. Inquiries should be directed to the Membership Secretary (see below). Back Issues: James Carrel, 209 Tucker Hall, Missouri University, Columbia, Missouri 65211-7400 USA. Telephone: (573) 882-3037. Undelivered Issues: Allen Press, Inc., 810 E. 10th Street, P.O. Box 368, Lawrence, Kansas 66044 USA. THE AMERICAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY PRESIDENT: Marshal Hedin (2015-2017), San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA. PRESIDENT-ELECT: Richard Bradley (2015-2017), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY: Jeffrey W. Shultz (appointed). Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA. TREASURER: Karen Cangialosi, Department of Biology, Keene State College, Keene, New Hampshire, USA. SECRETARY: Paula Cushing, Denver Museum of Nature and Science, Denver, Colorado, USA. ARCHIVIST: Lenny Vincent, Fullerton College, Fullerton, California, USA. DIRECTORS: Michael Draney (2014-2016), Charles Griswold (2015-2017), J. Andrew Roberts (2015-2017) PARLIAMENTARIAN: Brent Opell (appointed) HONORARY MEMBER: C.D. Dondale Cover photo: A crab spider, Tmarus sp. (Thomisidae), from Singapore. Illumination with ultra-violet light causes its prosoma, legs, and pedipalps to fluoresce a brilliant blue. Photo by Nicky Bay (sgmacro.blogspot.com). Publication date: 15 July 2016 ©This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:105-141 Revision of the Nearctic Eratigena and Tegenaria species (Araneae: Agelenidae) Angelo Bolzern and Ambros Hanggi: Biosciences, Natural History Museum Basel, Augustinergasse 2, CH-4001 Basel, Switzerland: E-mail: angelo.bolzern@arachnodet.com Abstract. Based on specimens from several museum collections and recently sampled spiders during a field excursion to Mexico in 2014, the 11 species of Tegenaria s. 1. endemic to the United States of America and Mexico are revised. Morphological characters and mitochondrial DNA sequences (COl, NADHl, 16S) serve as the basis for proposed new combinations and new species. Tegenaria chiricalmae Roth, 1968 remains the only endemic Tegenaria species in the Western Hemisphere. All other specific names {T. blanda Gertsch, 1971, T. caverna Gertsch, 1971, T. decora Gertsch, 1971, T.flexuosa F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1902, T.ftorea Brignoli, 1974, T. gertschi Roth, 1968, T. mexicana Roth, 1968, T. rothi Gertsch, 1971, T. selva Roth, 1968, and T. tlaxcala Roth, 1968) are transferred to the genus Eratigena Bolzern, Burckhardt & Hanggi, 2013. Six new species are described: E. edimindoi, E. fernandoi, E. giiauato, E. queretaro, E. xilitia, and E. yarini. In addition, females of E.flexnosa, and E. gertschi, and the male of E.ftorea are described for the first time. A phylogeny based on maximum likelihood analysis of combined mtDNA sequences, an identification key and images of all diagnosed species are provided. Keywords: Eratigena, mtDNA, new combination, new species, morphology http://zoobank.org/?lsid=urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4F518AA0-7745-403A-9EDF-A84622E9BEB7 Among the 114 known spider families, the Agelenidae comprises more than 1,160 described species and ranks as the 11*’’ most diverse group (World Spider Catalog 2015). Due to the obvious funnel-webs produced by many species, some of them are well known: for example, the large, long-legged European house spider {Eratigena atrica (C.L. Koch, 1843), formerly Tegenaria atrica), or the American grass spiders {Agelenopsis Giebel, 1869; 13 species). However, new species are still being discovered frequently (Bolzern & Herve 2010; Bolzern et al. 2009, 2013a, b; Bosmans 201 1; Maya-Morales & Jimenez 2013). Our knowledge of the taxonomy and phylogeny of this spider group has fundamentally improved in recent years (Bolzern et al. 2010, 2013a; Miller et al. 2010), and currently the family can be divided into two subfamilies. Ageleninae generally shows a Holarctic distribution, but includes five genera found only in the Afrotropical (two genera) or the Neotropical (three genera) region. One of these genera was first described in 2013 with six new species and is only known from the Baja California peninsula in Mexico (Maya-Morales & Jimenez 2013). The second subfamily, Coelotinae, forms a Holarctic lineage most diverse in Asia, with only two genera exclusively in North America. The subfamily Ageleninae includes the genus Tegenaria s. 1., composed of species endemic to the Palearctic or Nearctic regions. The European representatives of this genus were recently revised and grouped in four monophyletic genera (Bolzern et al. 2010, 2013a): Aterigena Bolzern, Hanggi & Burckhardt, 2010, Eratigena Bolzern, Burckhardt & Hanggi, 2013, Malthonica Simon, 1898, and Tegenaria Latreille, 1804. The generic affiliation of the 16 Nearctic species is resolved only for the presumably introduced European species, but not for the 11 endemic species. Roth (1952) published the first revision of Tegenaria in North America. His original hypothesis, that all Tegenaria s. 1. species were introduced into the Western Hemisphere from Europe (Roth 1956), was refuted after the discovery of endemic species from Mexico and Arizona (Roth 1968). After that, additional endemic species were described by Gertsch (1971) and Brignoli (1974). In his work, Brignoli noted that this species-complex was extremely problematic due to a lack of images, the very close relationships of the involved species and a lack of diagnostic features. Furthermore, until now, four species were described by one sex only. In view of these complexities and the high proportion of introduced species, a taxonomic clarification is essential for further research or nature conservation ap¬ proaches. Therefore, the aims of this paper are threefold: firstly, the taxonomical clarification of the endemic Nearctic and Neotropical Tegenaria s. 1. species and the publication of images of all endemic taxa; secondly, the description of newly discovered forms or species; and finally, the provision of mitochondrial gene sequences for certain species. METHODS Sampling and material examined. — Type specimens (includ¬ ing all type material) and additional material mentioned below were examined from the following institutions: American Museum of Natural History, New York, United States (AMNH: Norman Platnick, Lorenzo Prendini, Luis Sorkin); Biologfa Comparada, Taxonomia y Sistematica de Araneo- morphae, Universidad Naciona! Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico (FC-UNAM: Fernando Alvarez Padilla); Coleccion Nacional de Aracnidos, Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico (CNAN: Oscar Francke, Diego A. Barrales); Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Verona, Italy (MCSNV: Roberta Salmaso); Museum National d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France (MNHN: Christine Rollard); Naturhistorisches Museum Basel, Switzerland (NMB); and The Natural History Museum, London, Great Britain (NHM: Janet Beccaloni). To all specimens examined (excluding existing type material), an identifier was added to the vial (e.g., AB1234). Newly collected specimens are shared between FC-UNAM and the NMB. For 105 106 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY the collection at the NMB, official collection numbers are provided (e.g., NMB-ARAN-12345). Barcoding sequences (COl and NADHI) are referenced to the adequate specimens by providing the GenBank accession-number following the identifier. In addition to the museum collections, specimens were sampled during a field excursion to Mexico in October 2014 (A. Bolzern and E. Gonzalez Santillan). All specimens were collected by hand and transferred directly into pure ethanol. Distribution maps or single references of all georeferenced specimens are available on the scratchpads platform, online at http://agelenidsoftheworld.myspecies.info/specimen_ observation. In addition, downloadable high resolution images of representatives of the included species are available on the same website (Bolzern 2014). Molecular methods and analyses. — For DNA extractions, two legs were removed from a freshly sampled and alcohol- fixed (pure ethanol) specimen. The ethanol was removed by incubating the cut tissue at 56°C for 10 min. Then the leg was processed according to the protocol for the purification of total DNA from animal tissues (Spin-Column protocol) using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen). The DNA concentration of the resulting solution was measured using the fluorescent dye Picogreen and a Spectrofluorometer. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of two loci was undertaken by using the following primer pairs: LCO1490 (Folmer et al. 1994) and Cl-N-2191 (Simon et al. 1994) for the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (COl, 678 bp), and TL-l-N-12718 (Hedin & Maddison 2001; numbered following Simon et al. 1994) and M510 (Murphy et al. 2006) for the mitochondrial nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase subunit 1 (NADHI, 591 bp). For PCR, the Qiagen Hotstar polymerase reagents (Qiagen, Germany) were used. The following thermo cycling conditions were applied: initial denaturation step of 95°C for 15 min, followed by 15 touchdown cycles of: 94°C for 35 s, an annealing temperature of 60°C to 45°C for 90 s, and an extension temperature of 72°C for 90 s. After the touchdown cycling 30 additional cycles were added at 94°C for 35 s, 50°C for 90 s, and 72°C for 90 s. Finally, the cycling was followed by an additional extension of 72°C for 5 min. To eliminate incorporated nucleosides and primers, the PCR products were treated with ExoSAP-IT (GE Healthcare). The fragments were then sequenced in both directions using an ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Applied Biosystems). Se¬ quences were then analyzed using an ABI Prism 3730 Genetic Analyzer. Each sequence was proof-read by checking the chromato¬ grams by eye using the software FinchTV v. 1.4 (Geospiza Inc.). The complementary sequences (5' and 3' directions) of each specimen were aligned using ClustalW 2 (Larkin et al. 2007) on the EBI website (Li et al. 2015) to test the sequence quality. Each sequence was checked for contamination by using the ‘Basic Local Alignment Search Tool’ (BLAST) on the NCBI website. The alignments of the mitochondrial gene regions were carried out manually, using the translation to amino acids as a guide and checking for any inappropriately placed stop codons and insertions or deletions. All sequences were then cut to a length of 678 bp (COl) or 591 bp (NADHI). Within these two alignments no indels or stop codons occurred. In addition to the protein coding markers, GenBank was searched for 16S sequences of already included taxa. In favor of repeatability and objectivity, the 39 adequate sequences were aligned by using a fixed automatic alignment instead of manually edited alignments or alignments based on secondary structures. Therefore, multiple sequence alignments were carried out using the software package Opal (Wheeler & Kececioglu 2007) implemented in Mesquite (Maddison & Maddison 2015), applying the default parameters (A<->G: 56; C<->T: 53; transversions: 100; gap costs: open: 260; terminal open: 100; extension: 69; terminal extension: 66). The three alignments were concatenated using Mesquite, resulting in an alignment comprising 103 taxa and 1697 bp, and with an overall coverage of 68% (COl: 101 seq.; NADH: 70 seq.; 16S: 39 seq.). Details are available as Supplemental SI, a list of included taxonomic units for the molecular analysis with GenBank accession-numbers (online at http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1636/R15-81.S1), and Supplemental S2, a PHYLIP file showing the alignment of the mitochondrial COl, NADHI and 16S sequences (online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/ R15-81.s2). Both files are also available online at http:// agelenidsoftheworld.myspecies. info/content/downloads. Maximum likelihood analysis and bootstrap runs were performed using GARLI 2.01 (Zwickl 2006) at the CIPRES Science Gateway (M.A. Miller et al. 2010). For the two mitochondrial partitions, the codon model was applied, for the 1 6S partition a GTR-l-G-l-I model was used as suggested by the model search function in MEGA 6.0 (Tamura et al. 2013). Bootstrap values were subsequently drawn on the best ML tree using the program SumTrees within DendroPy (Suku- maran & Holder 2010, 2015). Parsimony analysis was performed in TNT Version 1.1 (Goloboff et al. 2008) applying a heuristic tree search with TBR, implied weighting (K=10), and 1000 random additions of taxa while holding 100 trees per iteration. Branch support was estimated by applying a jack¬ knife resampling method (1000 replicates) with default removal probability of characters (0.36). For both phyloge¬ netic analyses, Amaurobius ferox (Walckenaer, 1830) (Amaur- obiidae) was used as the outgroup, and resulting trees were rooted at the Amaurobius branch/clade. Morphological methods and abbreviations. — Preserved spec¬ imens were examined under a Leica MZ12 and a Leica Ml 65 C microscope. Images were taken using a Leica MCI 70 HD camera attached to the Leica Ml 65 C, and processed with the stacking program CombineZP (Alan Hadley) and Adobe Photoshop. To remove soft tissue, dissected female genitalia were first transferred to distilled water for several hours. Subsequently, they were put in an enzymatic lens cleaner solution overnight, washed, and transferred back to ethanol. The morphological terminology follows Bolzern et al. (2013a). The following abbreviations are used (see also Figs. 8, 9, 11, 14-16, 18-20, 22, 27, 28): AER, anterior eye row; ALE, anterior lateral eyes; ALS, anterior lateral spinnerets; AME, anterior median eyes; bulbL, distance of the cymbium base to the most distal tip of the male bulb (including conductor); C, conductor; CB, cymbium breadth; CD, copulatory duct; CL, carapace length; CLYl, clypeus height under AME; CLY2, clypeus height under ALE; CO, copulatory opening at female BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 107 epigyne; CW, carapace width; DB, dorsal branch of RTA; DP, distal portion of conductor; DS, distal sclerite at MA; E, embolus; FD, fertilization duct; MA, median apophysis of male bulb; OL, opisthosoma length; OW, opisthosoma width; PER, posterior eye row; PEE, posterior lateral eyes; PLS, posterior lateral spinnerets; PM, posterior membrane (internal posterior limit of female genital area); PME, posterior median eyes; PMS, posterior median spinnerets; PS, epigynal posterior sclerite; PT, epigynal ‘pseudo teeth’; R, retroventral ridge of palpal tibia; RC, receptaculum; RTA, retrolateral tibial apophysis (used here as the sum of all structures on the retrolateral aspect of the tibia of the male pedipalp); STL, sternum length; STW, sternum width; T, tegulum; TR, transversal ridge at conductor; VB, ventral branch of RTA. Taxonomical nomenclature follows the World Spider Catalog (2015). RESULTS Molecular data. — Maximum likelihood and parsimony (MP) analyses resulted in essentially identical best trees (Fig. 1, MP tree not shown). The higher level classification proposed by Bolzern et al. (2013a) is supported by the molecular data presented here and summarized as follows (see also Fig. 1): (1), Agelenidae is split into the two monophyletic subfamilies Ageleninae and Coelotinae; (2), the genera Tegenaria and Eratigena are separate monophyletic clades. However, the relationships between genera are unclear due to low supporting values. Based on mitochondrial DNA, the Mexican-clade represents a monophyletic sister-group to all other included Eratigena species (Fig. 1). Within this Mexican- clade, E. yarini sp. nov. and E. ednnmdoi sp. nov. represent a closely related, well supported monophyletic subgroup, the flexuosa-gxou^. Within the remaining species of the Mexican- clade, the species E. mexicana (Roth, 1968) and E. tiaxcala (Roth, 1968) are very closely related. A inexicana-group, as suggested by morphological data, is not supported by mtDNA data. Morphological data. — The finding that the Mexican species previously described in Tegenaria s. 1. are closely related to Palearctic Eratigena species is supported by the following morphological characters, which match the genus definition of Eratigena Bolzern et al. (2013a): (1), dentition of the retromargin of the chelicerae (six or more teeth, decreasing in size proximally); (2), the PMS bearing one conspicuously prominent spigot; (3), colulus developed as a trapezoidal plate with distal margin w-shaped; (4), absence of a retroventral ridge on male palpal tibia; (5), presence of a transverse hyaline (lamelliform) ridge on the conductor; and (6), presence of appendages at the genital ducts in females {mexicana-gxoup). Therefore, all Mexican Tegenaria species are here transferred from Tegenaria to Eratigena. Based on genital morphology (for details see Taxonomy section), the Mexican Eratigena species can be divided into a southern (the /?e.YMOja-group, also supported by mtDNA) and a northern species group (the mexicana-gxoup) . Tegenaria chiricahuae Roth, 1968, the only species exclu¬ sively known from Northern America (USA), differs mor¬ phologically from the Mexican species in all characters mentioned above and matches the definition of Tegenaria. Therefore, it remains the single endemic representative of the genus Tegenaria in the Western Hemisphere. SYSTEMATICS Family Agelenidae C.L. Koch, 1837 Genus Tegenaria Latreille, 1844 Tegenaria Latreille, 1844: 134. Full synonymy: see World Spider Catalog (2015). Type species. — Araneus doniesticus Clerck, 1757, by subse¬ quent designation of Kluge (2007). Diagnosis. — A detailed diagnosis for the genus Tegenaria was provided by Bolzern et al. (2013a: 774-775). Distribution. — The currently 104 described species (World Spider Catalog 2015; this publication) are primarily distribut¬ ed in the Mediterranean Region, spreading towards Asia. Tegeneria domestica (Clerck, 1757), T. pagana C. L. Koch, 1840 and T. parietina (Fourcroy, 1785) expanded their distribution areas extensively, most likely due to introductions by humans. In the Western Hemisphere, T. chiricahuae represents the only known endemic species. Tegenaria chiricahuae Roth, 1968 Figs. 8-16 Tegenaria chiricahuae Roth, 1968: 7, figs. 9-11. Type material. — Holotype male. UNITED STATES: Arizo¬ na: Cochise Co., Chiricahua Mountains, Cave Creek Canyon, 4.83 km W. of Portal, 28 November 1963, V. Roth (AMNH). Paratypes. UNITED STATES: Arizona: 1 9 allotype, same data as holotype except 30 June 1963 (AMNH); 1 9, same data except 30 November 1962 (MNHN). Other material examined. — UNITED STATES: Arizona: 1 9, Cochise Co., Chiricahua Mountains, Cave Creek Canyon, small cave 3.22 km W. of Portal, 2 June 1972, G. Dingerkus (AMNH: AB1155); 1 c?, 1 9, Huachuca Mountains, Carr Canyon, 1829 m, in cave with some litter, 23 March 1964, L. La Pre, M. Eells (AMNH: AB1180). New Mexico: 1 d, “new cave”, 18 December 1976, P. Strinati (MSCNV); 1 <5, 4 9, Eddy Co., Carlsbad Caverns National Park, Midnight Canyon, Ringtail Cave (Flea Cave), 26 May 1973, Wm. Elliott, W.C. Welbourn (AMNH: AB1150); 1 (?, 1 9, same data except Arch Cave, 27 November 1975, W.C. Welbourn (AMNH: AB1121); 1 S, same data except Dome Cave, 15 February 1975 (AMNH: AB1149); 2 9, same data except Helen’s Cave, 31 August 1974 (AMNH: AB1152); 1 6, same data except cave, goat trap, 19 February 1976 (AMNH). Texas: 2 9, Culberson Co., Guadalupe Mountains National Park, cave, upper sloth, 17 April 1976, W.C. Welbourn (AMNH). Diagnosis. — Male Tegenaria chiricahuae can be separated from all other Tegenaria species by the simple RTA (Figs. 13, 16), the large median apophysis with a pocket-like distal sclerite and the distally keel-shaped conductor tip (Figs. 14, 15). Females can be distinguished from other species by the distinct conformation of the epigyne and vulva (Figs. 8-12). Description. — Essential information was provided by Roth (1968). 108 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY ■ Amaurobius fenestralis ' Amaurobius ferox 100 Callobius sp. - Callobius ko 99 :oreanus Draconarius coreanus Draoonarius kayasanensis Pireneitega spinivulva Tegecoelotes secundus Histopona torpida loot Textrix cf. caudata ' Textrix caudata Textrix denticulata ■1^1 Maimuna cretica Lycosoides coarctata Agelena canadensis )e gideoni Novalena sp. mex13 Novalena sp. Huix Novalena sp. mex36 Rualena goleta - Rualena cruzana Novalena intermedia Calilena califomica Calilena restricta Calilena stylophora mnr Hololena curta ‘ • Hololena sp. 1 Hololena nedra Hololena sp. 2 Hololena adnexa Melpomene sp. mex25 “ Melpomene sp. mex36 Tortolena giaucopis mex34 Tortolena giaucopis mex10 Agelena limbata Agelena labyrinthica — — Allagelena koreana Allagelena gracilens Allagelena difficilis Barronopsis texana Barronopsis barrowsi Agelenopsis utahana Agelenopsis oregonensis ' Agelenopsis spatula Agelenopsis afeenae Agelenopsis aperta — — Agelenopsis iongistyla Agelenopsis Oklahoma Agelenopsis naevia Agelenopsis emertoni Agelenopsis pennsylvanica Agelenopsis potten Aterigena aculeata na ligurica Malthontca oceanica Tegenaria domestica '■“lenaria ariadnae egenaria ariadnae Tegenaria vankeerorum Tegenaria haspeti - Tegenaria dalmatica Tegenaria dalmatica Tegenaria campestris 99 1 Tegenaria ferruginea Mj— — Tegenaria parietina ■ Tegenaria parietina Tegenaria tndentina Tegenaria eleonorae enaria parmenidis Iwogumoa songminjae Tegenaria r— - legenana parmenidis 1 lOOp Tegenaria parmenidis Tegenaria parmenidis Eratigena aft. herculea Eratigena sardoa Eratigena ciauyeiia leiiisnea —— Eratigena incognita 1,00 [ Eratigena agrestis Eratigena atrica (saeva) Eratigena atrica • Eratigena.atri,ca,^, . . • Eratigena queretaro n. sp ' ' Erateria queretaro n. sp. ^ . Eraticifriayarini n. sp. ' • ; .ratigena edmui idol n. sp.' :■ Eratigena edmundoi n. sp.' iratigena decora . . . Erangeria cavema: ' ' Eraflgena guanato n, sp. . : ' Eratigena mexicana- 0 Eratigena Haxcala : Eratigena tlaxcala" . Eratigena mmandoi n. so,' Eratigena xilitla n. sp. Eratigena xilitia n. sp.' ■ Eratigena rothi .. - Eratigena rathl.- _ . .:. Mexican -clade^ . ' 's. , ,'1 O CB 3 3 03 (D 3 OJ C» > CQ 2. (B g CL 03 03 Figure 1. — Best maximum likelihood tree of mitochondrial genes (COl, NADH, 16S). Bootstrap values are given left and above nodes. Clades with jackknife support higher than 50 % (+) or 85 % (+-I-) from maximum parsimony analysis of the same alignment are indicated left and below nodes. BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 109 Distribution. — Reported from several caves in Arizona and New Mexico (United States). Tegeitaria domestica (Clerck, 1757) Araneus domesticus Clerck, 1757: 76-79, pi. 2, tab. 9, figs. 1-4 (in part). Full synonymy: see Roth (1968) and Bolzern et al. (2013a). Diagnosis. — Male Tegenaria domestica can be separated from all other Tegenaria species by the distinct RTA (Roth 1968: figs. 14, 15), the truncated terminal end of the embolus, and the terminally bifid conductor (Bolzern et al. 2013a: fig. 16 W, X). Females differ in having a strongly sclerotized posterior sclerite with the anterior margin concave in combination with a simple, subglobular vulva (Bolzern et al. 2013a: figs. 2 f, 18 b, c). Distribution. — Introduced from Europe. Cosmopolitan (synanthropic species). Tegenaria pagana C.L. Koch, 1840 Tegenaria pagana C.L. Koch, 1840: 31, pi. 262, figs. 612, 613. Full synonymy: see Roth (1968) and Bolzern et al. (2013a). Diagnosis. — Male Tegenaria pagana can be separated from all other Tegenaria species by the transversally arranged conductor, the elongated finger-shaped distal sclerite of the MA, and the distinct RTA (Roth 1968: figs. 30, 31; Bolzern et al. 2013a: fig. 28 K-L). Females show a high variability in epigynal morphology but differ from others in having a protruding suboval median plate with distinct anterolateral pockets, and a distinct triple twisted vulva (Bolzern et al. 2013a: figs. 28 P-W). Distribution. — Europe to Central Asia, introduced to North- and South America and New Zealand. Tegenaria parietina (Fourcroy, 1785) Aranea parietina Fourcroy, 1785: 533. Full synonymy: see Bolzern et al. (2013a). Diagnosis. — Tegenaria parietina specimens are most similar to specimens of Tegenaria ferruginea (Panzer, 1 804) but differ from all other species in having a unique RTA and a very strongly U-shaped anterior margin of the posterior sclerite in females (Bolzern et al. 2013a: fig. 21 N-R). Males can be separated from T. ferruginea by the much shorter conductor, females by the much less convoluted vulva. Distribution. — Introduced from Europe. In the Western Hemisphere, reported from the West Indies to Argentina. Genus Eratigena Bolzern, Burckhardt & Hanggi, 2013 Eratigena Bolzern, Burckhardt & Hanggi, 2013: 738 Type Species. — Tegenaria atrica C. L. Koch, 1843, by original designation. Diagnosis. — A detailed diagnosis for the genus Eratigena was provided by Bolzern et al. (2013a; 738-741). Distribution. — The currently 34 described species (World Spider Catalog 2015; this publication) are primarily distribut¬ ed in the West Mediterranean Region, but with representatives reaching as far east as Laos and 15 endemic species in Mexico. Eratigena atrica (C. L. Koch, 1843) and E. agrestis (Walck- enaer, 1802) were introduced into Northern America. KEY TO THE NEARCTIC SPECIES OF ERATIGENA 1 male palpal tibia with short dorsal spike, median apophysis pocket-like; female vulva with strongly convoluted and enclosed duct . 2 male palpal tibia without short dorsal spike, median apophysis protruding; female vulva with duct not enclosed . 3 2 male with massive and broad conductor with strongly sclerotized, pointed terminal appendages; female epigyne with protruding posterior sclerite and deep anterior cavity . agrestis male with strong conductor, terminally with elongated tip; female epigyne with large median area without protuberance or cavity . atrica 3 male conductor distally distinctly elongated (Figs. 27, 34, 52, 64); female with flattened or coiled copulatory duct without appendages (Figs. 19, 41, 45, 61) . flexiiosa-group, 4 distal portion of male conductor not distinctly elongated (Figs. 79, 82, 94, 112, 136, 142, 160, 166, 175, 187, 196, 208); female with short and straight copulatory duct with appendages (Figs. 73, 87, 101, 124, 133, 147, 149, 158, 185, 192, 206, 218) . . . mexicana-group, 1 4 carapace length smaller than 3 mm; subtegular sperm duct of male bulb c-shaped (Fig. 64); copulatory duct only flattened, not coiled (Fig. 61) . yarini carapace longer than 3 mm; subtegular sperm duct of male bulb moderately s-shaped (Figs. 27, 34, 52); copulatory duct coiled (Figs. 19, 41, 43) . 5 5 tegular sperm duct strongly undulated (arrow in Fig. 34); epigynal atrium bordered by pronounced broad ridge (Fig. 38) . . . . fiexuosa tegular sperm duct almost straight (Figs. 27, 52); epigynal atrium not bordered by protruding ridge (Figs. 18, 42) . 6 6 median apophysis long, with long triangular distal sclerite (Figs. 26, 28); copulatory duct with only one coil (Fig. 19) . ednnmdoi median apophysis very short, with reduced distal sclerite (arrows in Figs. 51-53); copulatory duct with two coils (Figs. 43-56) . . florea 1 carapace longer than 5 mm; legs exceptionally long (patella-tibia length leg I > 9 mm); indistinct abdominal pattern, grayish . . selva carapace shorter, if equally long, legs shorter and with distinct abdominal pattern . 8 110 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 8 eyes at least moderately reduced (Figs. 66, 84) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 eyes well developed . . . . . . . 10 9 eyes strongly reduced (Fig. 84) . . . . . caverna eyes moderately reduced (Fig. 66) . . . blanda 10 AME larger than PME (Figs. 163, 164, 212) . . . . 11 AME equally sized or smaller than PME . . . . . . . 12 1 1 CL shorter than 4 mm; male with distal sclerite of MA spoon-shaped, rounded (Figs. 208, 209); female with epigynal posterior sclerite dumbbell-shaped (Fig. 215) . . . xililla CL longer than 4.5 mm; male with distal sclerite of MA long, subtriangular and pointed (Figs. 165, 167); female with epigynal posterior sclerite as in Fig. 170 . . . rothi 12 male pedipalp with elongated femur and tibia (Fig. 140); female with posterior membrane (internal posterior limit of genital area) distinctly protruding anteriad (Figs. 148, 149) . . . mexicana male palpal femur and tibia not elongated; female with posterior membrane only moderately protruding, sometimes with median notch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 13 13 RTA with dorsal branch distally hook-shaped (Fig. 136); female with dumbbell-shaped posterior sclerite (posterior and anterior margins concave, Fig. 131) . . . . . . . . guanato RTA with dorsal branch distally pointed or truncated; posterior epigynal sclerite with anterior margin concave only. . 14 14 MA with distal sclerite distally pointed (Figs. 95, 161); female with prominent or elongated appendages at genital duct (Figs. 99-101, 158) . 15 MA with distal sclerite spoon-shaped, distally rounded; female with subcircular, less prominent appendages at genital duct . . . 16 15 MA with distal sclerite long triangular, sharply pointed (Figs. 159, 161); female vulva with arc-shaped anterior part (Fig. 158) . queretaro MA with distal sclerite subtriangular (Figs. 93, 95); female with distinctly elongated appendages at genital duct (Figs. 99- 101) . . . . . . . . . . . . . decora 16 sternum with distinct pale patch only at the anterior half (Fig. 103); PLS with distal segment as long as basal segment (Fig. 104); sperm duct at tegulum without distinct curve (Fig. Ill); female with semicircular posterior sclerite (Fig. 105) . fernandoi sternum with different pattern; PLS with distal segment longer than basal segment (Fig. 118); sperm duct at tegulum with distinct curve (Fig. 195); female posterior sclerite with anterior margin concave, posterior margin straight . 17 17 sternum with pale median line; MA with distal sclerite narrow, connection between tegulum and conductor narrow (Figs. 195-197); female as in Figs. 202-206 . . . . . . . tlaxcala sternum without pattern; MA with distal sclerite broad, connection between tegulum and conductor broad (Figs. 115, 116); female as in Figs. 122-125 . . gerlschi Emtigena agrestis (Walckenaer, 1802) Aranea agrestis Walckenaer, 1802: 216. Full synonymy: see Bolzern et al. (2013a). Diagnosis. — Male Eratigena agrestis are similar to speci¬ mens of E. atrica in having a pocket-like (Roth 1968: “shell¬ like”) median apophysis but differ from all other Eratigena species in having a massive and broad conductor with strongly sclerotized, pointed terminal appendages (Bolzern et al. 2013a: figs. 8 C-D, 9 A-B). Females differ in having a distinct epigyne with protruding posterior sclerite and deep anterior cavity (Bolzern et al. 2013a: fig. 9 D). Distribution. — Introduced from Europe. In the Western Hemisphere, reported from several north-western states and New York (USA), and south-western parts of Canada. Eratigena atrica (C. L. Koch, 1843) Tegenaria atrica C. L. Koch, 1843: 105, fig. 825. Full synonymy: see Bolzern et al. (2013a). Diagnosis. — Eratigena atrica specimens are similar to specimens of E. agrestis in having a pocket-like median apophysis, but differ from all other species in having the strongly sclerotized, finger-shaped and pointed dorsal branch of the RTA originating on a protuberance, and a strong conductor (Bolzern et al. 2013a: fig. 9 J-O). Females differ in having the large epigynal area as long as wide with distinct ‘pseudo teeth’, and having a uniquely shaped vulva (Bolzern et al. 2013a: fig. 10 A-F). Distribution. — Introduced from Europe. In the Western Hemisphere, reported from the north-western United States and southern Canada (from east to west). THE FLEXUOSA-GROVP The flexiiosa-group comprises four species: E. edmundoi sp. nov., E.flexuosa (F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1902) comb, nov., E. florea (Brignoli, 1974) comb, nov., and E. yarini sp. nov. The elongated distal part of the conductor (Figs. 27, 34, 52, 64) and the strongly elongated and coiled copulatory duct (anterior part, Figs. 19, 41, 45, 61) separate them from species of the mexicana-gmup. Eratigena edmundoi sp. nov. http://zoobank.org/?lsid=urn:lsid:zoobank. org:act:67CC827B-EF04-4C8F-AB60-6D7C7340C29A Figs. 2, 3, 17-29 Type material. — Holotype female. MEXICO: Veracruz: Pico de Orizaba Volcano, Atotonilco de Calcahualco, plot 1, 2300 BOLZERN & HANGGI^NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 111 Figures 2-7. — Photographs of habitats and webs. 2 & 3, Eraligena edmundoi sp. nov. from Ajalpan, street between Pala and Nicolas Bravo, 2619 m (Mexico); 4 & 5, Eratigena decora Gertsch, 1971 from Xilitla, Ahuacatlan, ESE. of Potrerillos, Cueva de Potrerillos, 1181 m (Mexico); 6, Eratigenci queretaro sp. nov. from Pinal de Amoles, at road 120 between Jalpan de Serra and Pinal de Amoles, close to La Curva del Chuveje, 20 km W. of Jalpan, 1288 m (Mexico); 7, Eratigena caverna Gertsch, 1971 from Penamiller, Cueva Puerto del Leon, 6.5 km SE. of Rio Blanco, 2484 m (Mexico). m, 14 February 2012, Lab. Aracnologia, F. Alvarez Padilla (FC-UNAM; AB1340). Paratypes. MEXICO: Veracruz: 1 S , same data as holotype (FC-UNAM; ABl 340); 1 5 , same data (FC-UNAM: ABl 343: accession-nr. LN887151, LN887174); 1 S, same data (FC- UNAM; AB1338). Other material examined. — MEXICO: Puebla: 19,3 juv., Ajalpan, street between Pala and Nicolas Bravo, 2619 m, oak- pine forest, at terrain break at steep slope near path in the forest, 7 October 2014, A. Bolzern, E. Gonzalez Santillan (NMB-ARAN-27500: AB1276); 1 d, 4 9, 2 juv., same data except 2545 m, pine forest, at terrain break (NMB-ARAN- 27501 to 27502: AB1275, AB1255: accession-nr. LN887150, LN887173); 2 9, Zoquitlan, 2nd river cave, 31 December 1977, P. Strickland (AMNH: ABl 148). Veracruz: 1 9, Volcan San Martin, near San Andres, 1524 m, 14 July 1953, C.J. Goodnight (AMNH: ABl 168). Etymology. — The specific name is a patronym in honor of Edmundo Gonzalez Santillan, a Mexican arachnologist, expedition guide and friend. Diagnosis. — Male E. edmundoi sp. nov. specimens differ from others of the group by the long triangular distal sclerite 112 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY at the median apophysis (Figs. 27, 28; rather than spoon shaped in E. yarini sp. nov. and E. fiexiiosa, moderately reduced in E. florea). They differ from E. yarini sp. nov. by the larger size (CL longer than 3.5 mm; in E. yarini sp. nov. shorter than 3 mm), and by the s-shaped subtegular sperm duct (Fig. 27; rather than c-shaped), and from E. flexuosa by the only moderately undulated tegular sperm duct (Fig. 27; rather than strongly undulated). Female specimens differ from all others of the group by the single coiled copulatory duct (Fig. 19; rather than only flattened in E. yarini sp. nov., double coiled in E. flexuosa and E. florea). In addition, specimens of E. edmimdoi sp. nov. differ in having the distal segment of the PLS only proximally darkened (Fig. 17). Description. — Measurements: Male (paratype): CL 4.0, CW 3.17, STL 1.97, STW 1.93, OL 4.27, OW 2.6. Leg I (6.8, 1.73, 6.4, 6.8, 3.3), II (5.87, 1.67, 3.67, 5.8, 2.93), III (5.27, 1.33, 4.07, 5.4, 2.4), IV (6.47, 1.6, 5.53, 7.4, 3.33), Pedipalp (1.83, 0.67, 1.0, 1.67), bulbL 1.0. Female (holotype): CL 4.01, CW 3.0, STL 1.8, STW 1.8, OL 5.33, OW 3.87. Leg I (5.2, 1.53, 4.66, 4.93, 2.6), II (4.27, 1.4, 3.53, 4.27, 2.0), III (3.93, 1.2, 3.2, 3.93, 1.87) , IV (5.2, 1.4, 4.2, 5.4, 2.27). Pedipalp (1.77, 0.73, 1.23, 1.87) . EPL 0.33, EPW 0.63. Eyes; eye rows moderately procurved (Fig. 23). PME 0.21, PLE 0.26, AME 0.24, ALE 0.23. Eye distances: PME-PME 1 x PME, PME-AME 0.5- 0.75 X PME, PME-PLE 0.5 x PME, PME-ALE 0.75-1 x PME, AME-AME 0.5 x AME, AME-ALE 0.25 x AME. CLYl 1.5 X AME, CLY2 0.5 x ALE. Male pedipalp: RTA with two branches, lateral branch simple, lobe-like, moder¬ ately protruding, dorsal branch strongly sclerotized, narrow finger shaped, sharply pointed. Short dorsal spike on palpal tibia absent. Embolus length about 3.5 x CB, originating at 7-8 o’clock position, distal tip at 3-4 o’clock position. Conductor lamelliform, distal portion (DP) distinctly elongat¬ ed, lateral margin folded (Figs. 27, 28). Terminal end of conductor strongly elongated, pointed. Transversal ridge (TR) of conductor expressed as hyaline ridge (Fig. 27). Conductor membranously connected to tegulum. MA originating at 4-5 o’clock position, protruding, longer than wide, distal sclerite (DS) translucent, long triangularly shaped (Figs. 27, 28). MA membranously connected to tegulum. Epigyne and vulva: Epigyne medially with a pale, hyaline area (Fig. 18). Posterior sclerite protruding anteroventral as moderately sclerotized bar with anterior margin concave (semicircular. Fig. 18), posterior membrane (PM, internal posterior limitation of genital area) notched (Fig. 19). CO laterally of posterior sclerite. Epigynal ‘pseudo teeth’ present, small (Fig. 20). Vulva consists of combined narrowly convoluted duct, CD less sclerotized, with one coil, without appendages, RC stronger sclerotized (Fig. 19). FD only represented by small, leaf-shaped appendages (Fig. 22). Other important characters'. Cheliceral promargin with 4-5, retromargin with 7-8 teeth, more proximally, the teeth become smaller. Colulus developed as trapezoidal plate with distal margin w-shaped. PMS bearing one conspicuously prominent spigot. PLS with distal segment nearly as long as basal segment (Fig. 25). Trichobothria on cymbium and palpal tarsus absent. Tarsal trichobothria at leg I 6-7. Small teeth on paired claws of leg I 10-1 1. Leg spination: male pedipalp (2-0- 0 or 2-1-0, 2-0-0, 1-1+lp-O), female pedipalp (3-0-0, 2-0-0, 2-2- 0), leg femora (1 -3-2-0, 1 -2-2-0 or 1 -3-2-0, 1 -2-2-0, 1-0- 1-0 or 1- 0-2-0 or 1-1-2-0), patellae (all 2-0-0), tibiae (0-0-0-4p or 0-1-0- l+3p, 0-0-0- lp+2+lp or O-l-O-lp-l-2+lp, l-2-2-2+2p or 2-2-2- 2+2p, 2-2-2-3+lp), metatarsi (0-0-0-4p+l, 0-l-0-4p+l, 0-3-2- 4p+l or 0-3-3-4p+l, 0-3-3-3p-t-l-l-lp+l), tarsi (0, 0, 0-2-3-0, 0-2- 3-0). Coloration'. Carapace with two longitudinal symmetrical dark bands, irregularly expressed, margins narrowly darkened, head region dorsolaterally with two distinct, longitudinally curved dark bands (Fig. 17). Chelicerae frontally with distinct dark patches (Fig. 23). Sternum darkened anteriorly, some¬ times also posteriorly (less distinct) with pale median band (Fig. 24). Opisthosoma dark, black, with reddish pale median band, anteriorly bordered by black bands or almost com¬ pletely black, posteriorly with yellowish, reddish chevrons, indistinct (Fig. 17). Legs irregularly annulated. Colulus laterally darkened. ALS moderately, basal segment of PLS distinctly darkened, distal segment of PLS only proximal half darkened. Distribution. — Reported from the two states Puebla and Veracruz (Mexico). Eratigena flexuosa (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1902), comb. nov. Figs. 30-41 Tegenaria flexuosa F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1902: 334, pi. 31, fig. 34; Roth, 1968: 14, figs. 19, 20. Type material. — Holotype male. MEXICO: Guerrero'. Omil- temi (“Omilteme” on label), 28 April 1900, F.D. Godman (NHML). Other material examined. — MEXICO: Guerrero: 1 $ , Chilpancingo, Cueva del Borrego, 3.5 km E of Omiltemi, 2623 m, pine-oak forest, 23 July 2009, A. Valdez, O. Francke, H. Montano, C. Santibanez, T. Palafox, C. Trajano (CNAN: ABl 199); 3 2 , same data except Cueva del Borrego, 2 km E of Omiltemi, 1835 m, vegetation outside the cave, 20 June 2007, O. Francke, H. Montano, L. Escalante, A. Ballesteros (CNAN: ABl 202). Diagnosis. — Male E. flexuosa specimens differ from others of the group by the strongly undulated tegular sperm duct (Fig. 34; rather than moderately undulated). They differ from E. edmimdoi sp. nov. and E. florea by the spoon-like distal sclerite of the MA (Figs. 33, 34; rather than long triangular or moderately reduced). They differ from E. yarini sp. nov. by the larger size (CL longer than 3.5 mm; in E. yarini sp. nov. shorter than 3 mm), and by the s-shaped subtegular sperm duct (Fig. 34; rather than c-shaped). Female specimens differ from E. edmimdoi sp. nov. and E. yarini sp. nov. by the double coiled copulatory duct (Fig. 41; rather than single coiled or only flattened), and from E. florea in having the epigynal median area bordered by a pronounced broad ridge (Fig. 38). Description. — Essential information for the male was provided by F.O. Pickard-Cambridge (1902). Measurements: Female (ABl 199); CL 3.75, CW 2.67, STL 2.0, STW 1.63, OL 3.67, OW 2.33. Leg I (6.13, 1.60, 5.67, 6.00, 2.8), II (5.00, 1.47, 4.47, 5.13, 2.33), III (4.40, 1.33, 3.60, 4.87, 2.20), IV (5.27, I. 47, 5.0, 6.87, 2.40). Pedipalp (1.97, 0.67, 1.17, 2.0). EPL 0.56, EPW 0.88. Eyes: anterior eye row straight, posterior eye row procurved (Fig. 37). PME 0.17, PLE 0.19 , AME 0.15, ALE 0.22. Eye distances; PME-PME 0.75 x PME, PME-AME 1 x PME, PME-PLE 1 X PME, PME-ALE 1.5 x PME, AME- AME 0.5 X AME, AME-ALE 0.5 x AME. CLYl 1.5 x AME, BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 113 CLY2 1.25 X ALE. Epigyne and vulva: Epigyne with hyaline area subrectangular, bordered by pronounced broad ridge (Fig. 38). Posterior membrane without notch (Fig. 41). CO anterolateral to posterior sclerite. Epigynal ‘pseudo teeth’ indistinct (Fig. 39). Vulva consists of combined narrowly convoluted duct, CD less sclerotized, almost double coiled, without appendages, RC more strongly sclerotized (Fig 41). FD only represented by small, leaf-shaped appendages. Other important characters: Cheliceral promargin with 4, retromar- gin with 6 teeth, more proximally, the teeth become smaller (Fig. 36). Colulus developed as trapezoidal plate with distal margin moderately w-shaped. PMS bearing one conspicuously prominent spigot. PLS with distal segment moderately longer than basal segment (Fig. 32). Trichobothria on cymbium and palpal tarsus absent. Tarsal trichobothria of leg I 7. Small teeth on paired claws of leg I 10-11. Leg spination: female pedipalp (1-0-0 or 2-0-0, 2-0-0, 2-1-2), leg femora (1-3-1-0 or 1- 3-2-0, 1 -2-2-0 or 1 -3-2-0, 1 -0-2-0 or 1- 1-2-0, 1-0- 1-0), patellae (all 2-0-0), tibiae (O-O-O-l or O-l-O-l, 0-1-0-lp or 1-1-0-lp, 2-1- l-2p, 2-1 -1-1), metatarsi (0-0-0- Ip+l+lp+l, 0-0-0- lp+2+lp-|-l, 0-1-1 -4p4-l or 0-l-2-4p-|-l, 0-2-l-4p-|-l or 0-2-2-4p-|-l ), tarsi (0, 0, 0-0- 1-0, 0-0-2-0). Coloration: Carapace with two longitudi¬ nal symmetrical dark bands, irregularly and indistinctly expressed, margins narrowly darkened, head region dorsolat¬ eral with two indistinct, longitudinally curved dark bands (Fig. 30). Chelicerae frontally without dark patches (Fig. 37). Sternum darkened, with indistinct pale median band (Fig. 31). Opisthosoma dark brownish to black, with yellowish pale median band, anteriorly with two longitudinally dark bands, posteriorly with yellowish chevrons (Fig. 30). Legs irregularly annulated. Colulus pale or laterally moderately darkened. ALS and both segments of PLS moderately darkened. Distribution. — Reported only from the state of Guerrero (Mexico). Comments. — Based on the drawing provided by F.O. Pickard-Cambridge (1902), Roth stated that the median apophysis is lacking (Roth 1968: 14), but this was a misinterpretation (see Figs. 33-35). Males and females have never been collected together (the only known male is the holotype). However, based on their morphological similarity and their collection close to the type locality, these females are tentatively placed with this species. Eratigena ftorea (Brignoli, 1974), comb. nov. Figs.42~53 Tegenaria florea Brignoli, 1974: 228, fig. lOA, C. Tegenaria florea: Brignoli, 1974: 231, fig. lOB. Type material. — Holotype female. MEXICO: Chiapas: Comitan, Cueva de las Florecillas, 2265 m, 18 March 1971, A. Zollini (MCSNV). Other material examined. — MEXICO: Chiapas: 1 9 , Ama- tenango, Cueva I de Tulanca, 2200 m, 4 March 1971, V. Sbordoni (MCSNV); 1 $ , Comitan, Cueva de la Cruz Belen, 2210 m, 19 March 1971, R. Argano (MCSNV, sub prope florea)', 1 ?, 5 miles West of San Cristobal, 24 August 1966, W. & J. Ivie (AMNH: AB1112); 1 $, same data except 2438 m, pine-oak forest, 16 August to 3 September 1969, S. & J. Peck (AMNH: AB1166); 1 d, Laguna Belgica Educational Park, 16 km NW. of Ocozocoautla de Espinosa, 14 June 1990, H. Howden (AMNH: AB1141). Oaxaca: 1 9, Santa Marfa Tlahuitoltepec, Distrito Mixes, 2032 m, pine forest, disturbed, 14 September 2009, A. Valdez, C. Santibanez, R. Paredes (CNAN: AB1193); 1 9, Yautepec, Santo Tomas Teipan, 2346 m, cloud forest, 20 March 2002, S. Reynaud (CNAN: AB1200). Diagnosis. — Male E. florea specimens differ from others of the group by the moderately reduced distal sclerite of the median apophysis (Figs. 51, 52; rather than long and triangular in E. edmundoi sp. nov., spoon shaped in E. yarini sp. nov. and E. flexuosa). Female specimens differ from E. edmundoi sp. nov. and E. yarini sp. nov. by the double coiled copulatory duct (Fig. 43; rather than single coiled or only flattened), and from E. flexuosa in having the epigynal median area not bordered by a pronounced broad ridge (Fig. 42). Description. — Essential information for the female was provided by Brignoli (1974). Measurements: Male (AB1141): CL 2.9, CW 2.17, STL 1.42, STW 1.34, OL 3.17, OW 2.1. Leg I (5.25, 1.15, 5.15, 5.8, 3.05), II (4.6, 1.0, 3.98, 4.5, 2.1), III (4.1, I. 0, 3.65, 4.5, 2.25), IV (5.35, 1.0, 4.75, 6.4, 2.8), Pedipalp (1.3, 0.44, 0.56, 1.18), bulbL 0.84. Eyes: eye rows moderately procurved (Fig. 48). PME 0.17, PLE 0.18 , AME 0.16, ALE 0.22. Eye distances: PME-PME 0.5 x PME, PME-AME 0.5 x PME, PME-PLE 0.4 x PME, PME-ALE 0.7 x PME, AME AME 0.5 X AME, AME-ALE 0.25 x AME. CLYl 1.5-2 x AME, CLY2 0.75-1 x ALE. Male pedipalp: RTA with two branches, lateral branch simple, lobe-like, moderately pro¬ truding, dorsal branch strongly sclerotized, narrow finger shaped, sharply pointed. Short dorsal spike on palpal tibia absent. Embolus length about 3.5 x CB, originating at 7-8 o’clock position, distal tip at 4 o’clock position. Conductor lamelliform, distal portion distinctly elongated, lateral margin folded (Figs. 51-53). Terminal end of conductor strongly elongated, pointed. Transversal ridge of conductor expressed as hyaline ridge. Conductor membranously connected to tegulum. MA originating at 4-5 o’clock position, as long as wide, distal sclerite translucent, plate like, moderately reduced (Figs. 51-53). Other important characters: Cheliceral promar¬ gin with 4-5, retromargin with 7-8 teeth, more proximally, the teeth become smaller. Colulus developed as rectangular to trapezoidal plate with distal margin w-shaped. PLS with distal segment slightly shorter than basal segment (Fig. 50). Trichobothria on cymbium and palpal tarsus absent. Tarsal trichobothria at leg I 6-7. Small teeth on paired claws of leg I 8. Leg spination: male pedipalp (2-0-0, 2-0-0, 1-1-0), leg femora (1 -2-0-0, 1 -0-0-0 or 1-1 -0-0, 1 -0-0-0, 1 -0-0-0), patellae (all 2-0-0), tibiae (O-O-O-l, O-O-O-l or 1 -0-0-1, 2-1-0-1, 2-1-1-1), metatarsi (0-0-0- lp-fl-l-lp-l-1, 0-0-0- Ip-fl-t-lp-t-l or 0-0-0- lp+2-|-lp-|-l, 0-2-1 -lp-|-l-|-2p-|-l, 0-2-l-Ip-|-2-|-lp-|-l), tarsi (0, 0, 0, O-O-l-O). Coloration: Carapace with two longitudinal symmetrical dark bands, irregularly expressed, margins narrowly darkened (Fig. 47). Chelicerae frontally with indistinct dark patches (Fig. 48). Sternum indistinctly dark¬ ened, anteriorly with pale median band (Fig. 49). Opisthoso¬ ma dark, grayish brown, without reddish pigments, pale median band, posteriorly with pale, yellowish chevrons, indistinct (Fig. 47). Legs irregularly annulated, indistinct. Colulus moderately darkened. ALS and both segments of PLS darkened. 114 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Distribution. — Reported from several localities in the states of Chiapas and Oaxaca (Mexico). Comments. — Males and females have never been collected together. However, based on their morphological similarity and the collection site being within the distribution range of the females, the male from Laguna Belgica Educational Park, 16 km NW. of Ocozocoautla de Espinosa, is tentatively placed in this species. Eratigem yarini sp. nov. http://zoobank.org/?lsid=urn:lsid:zoobank. org:act:FAFC2F99-20AC-439C-B177-E767115CA13B Figs. 54-65 Type material. — Holotype female. MEXICO: Veracruz: Pico de Orizaba Volcano, Atotonilco de Calcahualco, plot 1, 2300 m, 24 February 2013, Lab. Aracnologia, F. Alvarez Padilla (FC-UNAM: AB1342). Paratypes. MEXICO: Veracruz: 1 6 , same data as holotype (FC-UNAM: AB1341); 1 d, 1 9, same data (NMB-ARAN- 27503 to 27504: AB1332, AB1334: accession-nr. LN887162, LN887181). Other material examined. — MEXICO: Oaxaca: 1 9, “El Cumbre” on ridge E. of Cerro San Felipe, 2438 m, 28 September 1961, C.M. & M.R. Bogert (AMNH: AB1124). Etymology. — The specific name is a patronym dedicated to Yarin Bolzern, the second born child of the first author. Diagnosis. — E. yarini sp. nov. specimens differ from others of the group by the smaller size (CL shorter than 3.0 mm; all others longer than 3.5 mm). Males differ by the c-shaped subtegular sperm duct (arrow in Fig. 64; rather than s-shaped), females by the only flattened copulatory duct (Figs. 59-61; rather than single or double coiled). Description. — Measurements: Male (paratype): CL 1.9, CW 1.5, STL 1.97, STW 1.93, OL 2.04, OW 1.26. Leg I (2.5, 1.0, 2.23, 2.02, 1.42), II (2.04, 0.68, 1.64, 1.78, 1.26), III (1.9, 0.62, 1.34, 1.8, 1.1), IV (2.67, 0.733, 2.2, 2.67, 1.4), Pedipalp (0.78, 0.32, 0.44, 0.68), bulbL 0.4. Female (holotype): CL 2.53, CW 1.83, STL 1.12, STW 1.14, OL 3.0, OW 2.12. Leg I (2.67, 0.87, 2.4, 2.4, 1.67), II (2.4, 0.7, 1.68, 1.88, 1.1), III (2.1, 0.68, 1.54, 1.9, 1.2), IV (2.87, 0.8, 2.28, 3.03, 1.3). Pedipalp (0.96, 0.42, 0.64, 1.08). EPL 0.38, EPW 0.58. Eyes: eye rows moderately procLirved (Fig. 55). PME 0.1, PLE 0.12 , AME 0.08, ALE 0.1. Eye distances: PME-PME 0.5-1 x PME, PME-AME 0.5-1 x PME, PME PLE 0.5 1 x PME, PME-ALE 1 x PME, AME- AME <0.5 X AME, AME-ALE <0.5 x AME. CLYl 2 x AME, CLY2 0.5-1 x ALE. Male pedipalp: RTA with two branches, lateral branch triangular, protruding, dorsal branch strongly sclerotized, narrow finger shaped, sharply pointed (Fig. 65). Short dorsal spike on palpal tibia absent. Embolus length about 2 x CB, originating at 8 o’clock position, distal tip at 4 o’clock position. Conductor lamelliform, distal portion distinctly elongated, lateral margin folded (Figs. 63-65). Terminal end of conductor strongly elongated, pointed. Transversal ridge of conductor expressed as hyaline ridge. Conductor membranously connected to tegulum. MA origi¬ nating at 6 o’clock position, protruding, longer than wide, distal sclerite translucent, spoon-like (Figs. 63, 64). MA membranously connected to tegulum. Epigyne and vulva: Epigyne medially with a pale, hyaline area (Fig. 58). Posterior sclerite with anterior margin strongly concave, posterior membrane broadly notched (Fig. 61). CO anterolateral to posterior sclerite. Epigynal ‘pseudo teeth’ present, small (Fig. 62). Vulva consists of combined narrowly convoluted duct, CD flattened, medially elongated, without appendages, RC stronger sclerotized (Figs. 59-61). FD only represented by small, leaf-shaped appendages. Other important characters: Cheliceral promargin with 4, retromargin with 5 (male) or 6 (female) teeth, most proximal tooth smaller. Colulus devel¬ oped as trapezoidal plate with distal margin w-shaped. PMS bearing one conspicuously prominent spigot. PLS with distal segment nearly as long as basal segment (Fig. 57). Tricho- bothria on cymbium and palpal tarsus absent. Tarsal trichobothria at leg I 5-6. Small teeth on paired claws of leg I 7. Leg spination: male pedipalp (2-0-0, 2-0-0, 1-2-0), female pedipalp (2-0-0, 2-0-0, 2-2-0), leg femora (2-2-0-0, 2-0-0-0, 2-0- 1- 0, l-O-l-O), patellae (all 2-0-0), tibiae (2-0-0- 1+1 p,2-l-0-2p, 2- 2- 1-3, 2-2-2-3), metatarsi (0-0-0-3p+l, 0-l-0-3p+l, 0-3-2- lp+l+2p+l, 0-3-2- lp+l+2p+l), tarsi (0, 0, 0-1-2-0, 0-2-3-0). Coloration: Carapace and head region with two broad longitudinal symmetrical dark bands, with triangular darker spots (Fig. 54). Chelicerae frontally with indistinct dark patches (Fig. 55). Sternum darkened, distinct pale median band, laterally with indistinct paler spots (Fig. 56). Opistho- soma dark, brownish, sprinkled with small pale spots, indistinct pale median band, posteriorly with yellowish chevrons, indistinct (Fig. 54). Leg femora broad but moder¬ ately annulated, other segments moderately annulated, tarsi pale. Colulus, ALS and PLS distinctly darkened (Fig. 57). Distribution. — Reported only from the state of Veracruz (the type locality) and one locality in the state of Oaxaca (Mexico). THE MEXICANA-GKOCV The mexicana-gxow'p comprises 12 species: E. blanda (Gertsch, 1971) comb, nov., E. caverna (Gertsch, 1971) comb, nov., E. decora (Gertsch, 1971) comb, nov., E. fernandoi sp. nov., E. gertschi (Roth, 1968) comb, nov., E. guanato sp. nov., E. mexicana (Roth, 1968) comb, nov., E. queretaro sp. nov., E. rothi (Gertsch, 1971) comb., nov., E. selva (Roth, 1968) comb, nov., E. tlaxcala (Roth, 1968) comb, nov., and E. xilitla sp. nov. The only moderately elongated distal portion of the conductor (Figs. 79, 82, 94, 112, 136, 142, 160, 166, 175, 187, 196, 208) and the short, straight copulatory duct with mostly distinct appendages (Figs. 73, 87, 101, 124, 133, 147, 149, 158, 185, 192, 206, 218) separate them from specimens of the flexuosa-gvou'p. Emtigena blanda (Gertsch, 1971), comb. nov. Figs. 66-71 Tegenaria blanda Gtxisch, 1971: 105. Type material. — Holotype female. MEXICO: Tamaulipas: El Porvenir, Cueva de la Capilla, 13.5 km NW Gomez Farias, 28 January 1969, J. Reddell, R. Mitchell, F. Rose, J. George (AMNH). Other material examined. — MEXICO: Tamaulipas: 1 9, Gomez Farias, Cueva de la Perra, 15 mi. NW Gomez Fan'as, 2164 m, 28 January 1968, J. Reddell, R. Mitchell, F. Rose, J. George (AMNH: AB1153). BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 115 Diagnosis. — Females of E. blanda differ from all other Nearctic Eratigena species in having moderately reduced eyes (Fig. 66; rather than strongly reduced eyes in E. caverna, eyes normally developed in all other species). Description. — Essential information was provided by Gertsch (1971). Distribution. — Reported from two caves in the state of Tamaulipas (Mexico). Eratigena caverna (Gertsch, 1971), comb. nov. Figs. 7, 81-89 Tegenaria caverna Gertsch, 1971; 106, figs. 158-160. Type material. — Hoiotype male. MEXICO: Queretaro: Penamiller, Cueva Puerto del Leon, 6.5 km SE Rio Blanco, 9 July 1967, J. Reddell, J. Fish, P. Russell (AMNH: AB1156). Paratypes. MEXICO: Queretaro: 2 9 allotypes, same data as hoiotype (AMNH: AB1156). Other material examined. — MEXICO: Queretaro: 5 juv., same data as hoiotype except deep inside cave, 2484 m, 14 October 2014, A. Bolzern, E. Gonzalez Santillan (NMB- ARAN-27505 to 27507: AB1244, AB1305, AB1284: accession- nr. LN887148, LN887187). Diagnosis. — Male and female E. caverna specimens differ from all other West Nearctic Eratigena species by having strongly reduced eyes (Fig. 84; rather than moderately reduced in E. blanda, eyes normally developed in all other species). Description. — Essential information was provided by Gertsch (1971). Distribution. — Reported only from a cave near Rio Blanco in the state of Queretaro (Mexico). Comments. — Specimens could not be detected at the entrance of the cave but only very deep inside the cave. There, they were quite abundant, building their webs (Fig. 7) between large rocks which covered the lower part of the cave. Interestingly, there was no tube- or funnel-shaped retreat detectable in their webs. The spiders were just sitting in the middle of their web on a circular, more densely woven patch. Eratigena decora (Gertsch, 1971), comb. nov. Figs. 4, 5, 90-101 Tegenaria decora Gertsch, 1971: 104, figs. 164, 165. Type materia!. — Hoiotype male. MEXICO: San Luis Potosr. Cueva de Potrerillos, 1.5 km W. of Ahuacatlan, 12 July 1967, J. Reddell, J. Fish, P. Russell (AMNH). Paratypes. MEXICO: San Luis Potosr. 7 9, same data as hoiotype (AMNH: AB1167). Other material examined. — MEXICO: San Luis Potosr. 1 S , 1 9, Xilitla, Ahuacatlan, ESE. of Potrerillos, Cueva de Potrerillos, 1181 m, cave entrance with tropical forest in the middle of pasture land, at rock faces and woody vegetation, 12 October 2014, A. Bolzern, E. Gonzalez Santillan (NMB- ARAN-27508: AB1237: accession-nr. LN887149); 2 (?, 5 9, 3 juv., same data (FC-UNAM: AB1240, AB1280). Diagnosis. — Female E. decora specimen differ from all others of the group in having elongated appendages at the genital duct (Figs. 99-101). Males are similar to E. guanato sp. nov., E. queretaro sp. nov., E. rothi and E. selva in having at least a moderately pointed distal sclerite of the MA (Figs. 93, 95). They differ from E. guanato sp. nov., E. rothi and E. selva in having a relatively slim, finger-shaped and simply pointed dorsal branch of the RTA (rather than distally hook-shaped in E. quanato sp., nov. strong and basally bent in E. rothi and E. selva), and from E. queretaro sp. nov. in having a subtrian- gular, moderately pointed distal sclerite of the MA (rather than triangular and sharply pointed). Description. — Essential information was provided by Gertsch (1971). Distribution. — Reported only from one cave in the state of San Luis Potosi (Mexico). Comments. — In 2014, specimens of E. decora were collected at the entrance of Cueva de Potrerillos (Figs. 4, 5), the type locality. Interestingly, this cave entrance, a large woody hole, is located in the middle of pasture land, surrounded by cattle and secured by a fence. It is remarkable that the webs of this species were also attached to the woody vegetation, and not exclusively to rocks (Fig. 5). Eratigena fernandoi sp. nov. http://zoobank.org/?lsid=urn;lsid;zoobank. org:act:19066CFl-0625-4D40-8FB7-35E0CF74AD8B Figs. 102-113 Type material. —Hoiotype male. MEXICO: Veracruz: Ato- tonilco de Calcahualco, Pico de Orizaba Volcano, plot 2, 24 February 2013, Lab. Aracnologia FC-UNAM (FC-UNAM: AB1335: accession-nr. LN887152, LN887175). Paratypes. MEXICO; Veracruz: I 9, same data as hoiotype except 14 February 2012 (FC-UNAM: AB1333). Other material examined. — MEXICO: Veracruz: 3 6, Huatusco, 7 km E Huatusco, cloud forest, 22 Jun 1983, S. & J. Peck (AMNH: AB1137). Etymology. — The specific name is a patronym in honor of Fernando Alvarez Padilla, a Mexican arachnologist and active and strong supporter of the current work. Diagnosis. — Male and female of E. fernandoi sp. nov. differ from related species in having a distinct pale patch only at the anterior half of the sternum (Fig. 103). Males are most similar to E. gertschi in having the posterior sclerite of the MA broadly spoon-shaped and distally rounded (rather than distally pointed in E. decora, E. guanato sp. nov., E. rothi and E. selva), but differ from that species in having the distal segment of the PLS as long as the basal segment (Fig. 104; rather than distal segment longer than basal segment), and the spermatic duct of the tegulum without a distinct curve (arrow in Fig. Ill; rather than distinctly curved). Females differ by the semicircular posterior sclerite (Fig. 105), and the anteriorly differently convoluted genital ducts (Fig. 106). Description. — Measurements: Male (hoiotype): CL 2.26, CW 1.7, STL 1.06, STW 1.14, OL 3.0, OW 1.74. Leg I (4.0, 0.93, 3.8, 3.8, 2.33), II (3.57, 0.9, 2.97, 3.6, 2.03), III (3.13, 0.8, 2.63, 3.43, 1.7), IV (3.93, 0.93, 3.43, 4.35, 2.1), Pedipalp (1.2, 0.42, 0.68, 1.03), bulbL 0.44. Female (paratype): CL 3.2, CW 2.4, STL 1 .8, STW 1 .8, OL 3.3, OW 2.47. Leg I (4.25, 1.1, 3.75, 3.95, 2.3), II (3.87, 1.1, 3.23, 3.6, 1.76), III (3.3, 1.0, 2.73, 3.47, 1.6), IV (4.25, 1.0, 3.7, 4.65, 1.92). Pedipalp (1.36, 0.56, 0.94, 1.11). EPL 0.33, EPW 0.54. Eyes: anterior eye row straight, posterior moderately procurved (Fig. 102). PME 0.13, PLE 0.14 , AME 0.12, ALE 0.17. Eye distances: PME-PME 1 x PME, PME-AME 0.5-0.75 x PME, PME-PLE 1 x PME, 116 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY PME-ALE 1.25 x PME, AME-AME 0.5-0.75 x AME, AME-ALE 0.5 x AME. CLYl 2 x AME, CLY2 1.5 x ALE. Male pedipalp: RTA with two branches, lateral branch simple, lobe-like, moderately protruding, dorsal branch strongly sclerotized, narrow finger shaped, sharply pointed (broken off in Figs. 112, 113). Short dorsal spike on palpal tibia absent. Embolus length about 1.5 x CB, originating at 9-10 o’clock position, distal tip at 4 o’clock position. Conductor lamelli- form, distal portion only moderately elongated, lateral margin folded (Figs. 112, 113). Terminal end of conductor strongly elongated, pointed. Transversal ridge of conductor expressed as hyaline ridge (Figs. Ill, 112). Conductor membranously connected to tegulum. MA originating at 5 o’clock position, protruding, longer than wide, distal sclerite translucent, broad spoon shaped. MA membranously connected to tegulum. Epigyne and vulva: Epigyne medially with a pale, hyaline area, oval (Fig. 105). Posterior sclerite protruding anteroventral as moderately sclerotized bar with anterior margin concave (semicircular, Fig. 105), posterior membrane notched (Fig. 106). CO anterolateral to posterior sclerite. Epigynal ‘pseudo teeth’ present, small. Vulva consists of combined narrowly convoluted duct, CD less sclerotized, with indistinct append¬ ages, RC stronger sclerotized (Figs. 106, 107). ED only represented by small, leaf-shaped appendages. Other important characters: Cheliceral promargin with 4, retromargin with 6 small teeth in two separated groups of 3, most proximal tooth smaller. Colulus developed as trapezoidal plate with distal margin moderately w-shaped (Fig. 104). PMS bearing one conspicuously prominent spigot. PLS with distal segment nearly as long as basal segment (Fig. 104). Trichobothria on cymbium and palpal tarsus absent. Tarsal trichobothria at leg I 6. Small teeth on paired claws of leg I 7-10. Leg spination: male pedipalp (2-0-0, 2-0-0, 1-2-0), female pedipalp (3-0-0, 2-0- 0, 2-2-0), leg femora (1 -2-0-0 or 1-3- 1-0, 1 -2-2-0 or 1-1 -2-0, 1-0- 2-0 or 1 -2-2-0, 1 -0-2-0), patellae (all 2-0-0), tibiae (0-1 -0-1 or 1- 1-0-1, 0-1-0- 1 or 1-1-0- 1, 2-1 -1-1 or 2-2- 1-2, 2-2-2-3), metatarsi (0-0-0-4|^l, 0-0-0-4|^l or 0-l-0-4p+l, 0-2-2-4p+l or 0-3-3- 4i^l, 0-3-3-4i^l), tarsi (0, 0, O-O-l-O, 0-1-3-0 or 0-2-2-0). Coloration: Carapace with two longitudinal symmetrical dark bands, irregularly expressed, margins narrowly darkened, head region dorsolaterally with two distinct, longitudinally curved dark bands (Fig. 109). Chelicerae frontally with distinct dark patches (Fig. 102). Sternum darkened, anterior half with pale median band (Fig. 103). Opisthosoma greenish to dark gray, without reddish pigments, indistinct yellowish median band, anteriorly bordered by dark bands, posteriorly with yellowish chevrons, indistinct (Fig. 109). Legs irregularly but distinctly annulated. Colulus completely darkened. ALS moderately, basal segment of PLS distinctly darkened, distal segment of PLS only proximal half darkened. Distribution.- Reported only from two localities in the state of Veracruz (Mexico). Eratigena gertschi {Roth, 1968), comb. nov. Figs. 1 14-125, cf. gertschi Figs. 72-80 Tegenaria mexicana gertschi Roth, 1968: 22, fig. 27. Tegenaria gertschi Roth: Brignoli, 1974: 230. Type material.- male. MEXICO: Nuevo Leon: Resumidero (cave) de Pablillo at Hacienda Pablillo, 30 km south of Galeana, 4 June 1966, J. Reddell, D. McKenzie (AMNH). Other material examined (of E. gertschi s. s.). — MEXICO: Nuevo Leon: 1 9, Monterrey, Chipinque Mesa, small caves, 1645 m, 24 June 1969, S. & J. Peck, R. Norten (AMNH: AB1106). Tamaulipas: 2 9, Gomez Farias, 6 miles NW. of Gomez Farias, mine cave, March 1969, J. Reddell, C. Tucker (AMNH: AB1161); 1 9, Rancho del Cielo, mine cave, 3 June 1967, R. Mitchell (AMNH: AB1135); 1 9, same data except 10 January 1971, J. Reddell (AMNH: AB1163). Other material examined (of E. cf. gertschi). — MEXICO: Tamaulipas: 1 9, Ejido Conrado Castillo, Cerro Zapatero, Cueva del Coral, 19 March 1979, D. Pate, J. Atkinson, M. Shumate (AMNH, AB1102); 1 6, San Juan, La Cueva sin Nombra, 4 June 1967, R. Mitchell (AMNH: AB1165); 1 S, Sotano de Monumento, 26 km WNW of Ocampo, near Allende, 5 September 1979, W.R. Elliott, D.C. Rudolph (AMNH: AB1142). Diagnosis. — Male and female of E. gertschi are similar to E. mexicana in having the distal segment of the PLS twice as long as the basal segment (Fig. 118; E. xilitla sp. nov. with distal to basal segment 3/2). Males differ from E. mexicana by the normal proportions of the palpal femur and tibia (Fig. 117; rather than both strongly elongated), females in having an only moderately elevated and medially notched posterior membrane (Fig. 125; rather than strongly elevated). Males of E. gertschi are similar to E. fernandoi sp. nov. in having the posterior sclerite of the MA broadly spoon-shaped and distally rounded (Fig. 116; rather than distally pointed in E. decora, E. guanato sp. nov., E. rothi and E. selva), but differ from this species in having the spermatic duct of the tegulum distinctly curved (arrow in Fig. 114; rather than without distinct curve). Females are similar to specimens of E. guanato sp. nov., E. rothi, E. tlaxcala, and E. xilitla sp. nov. but differ from E. guanato sp. nov. in having the posterior sclerite not dumbbell-shaped (Fig. 122), from E. rothi and E. xilitla sp. nov. in having the AME only as large as the PME, and from E. tlaxcala by the terminal part of the vulva (Figs. 123, 124). Description, — Essential information for the male was provided by Roth (1968: 22-23). Measurements: Female (AB1106): CL 4.1, CW 3.1, STL 1.9, STW 1.72, OL 5.25, OW 3.6. Leg I (6.45, 1.7, 6.1, 6.2, 2.65), II (5.6, 1.45, 4.55, 5.2, 2.25), III (5.05, 1.25, 3.95, 5.2, 2.05), IV (6.5, 1.57, 5.55, 7.25, 2.5). Pedipalp (2.17, 0.8, 1.33, 1.97). EPL 0.43, EPW 0.81. Eyes: anterior eye row straight, posterior eye row moderately procurved. PME 0.18, PLE 0.23, AME 0.14, ALE 0.21. Eye distances: PME-PME 1.5 x PME, PME-AME 1.25 x PME, PME-PLE 1.25 X PME, PME-ALE 1.5 x PME, AME-AME 0.75-1 X AME, AME-ALE 0.8 x AME. CLYl 2.5 x AME, CLY2 1 .3 X ALE. Epigyne and vulva: Epigyne medially with a pale, hyaline area (Fig. 122). Posterior sclerite protruding anteroventral as moderately sclerotized bar with anterior margin concave (Figs. 122, 125), posterior membrane notched (Fig. 125). CO laterally of posterior sclerite. Epigynal ‘pseudo teeth’ present, small (Fig. 122). Vulva consists of combined narrowly convoluted duct, CD less sclerotized, with append¬ ages (Figs. 124, 125), RC stronger sclerotized, terminally strongly convoluted (Figs. 123, 124). FD only represented by small, leaf-shaped appendages. Other important characters: Cheliceral promargin with 4, retromargin with 6 teeth, more BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 117 proximally, the teeth become smaller. Colulus developed as trapezoidal plate with distal margin w-shaped. PMS bearing one conspicuously prominent spigot. PLS with distal segment twice as long as basal segment (Fig. 118). Trichobothria on cymbium and palpal tarsus absent. Tarsal trichobothria at leg I 7. Small teeth on paired claws of leg I 10-11. Leg spination: female pedipalp (0-0-0 or 1-0-0, 2-0-0, 2-1+lp-O), leg femora (1 -2-0-0, 1 -1-1-0, 1 -0-0-0, 1 -0-0-0), patellae (all 2-0-0), tibiae (O-O-O-O, O-O-O-O, O-O-O-O or 2-0-0-0, 2-0-0- 1), metatarsi (0-0-0- 4p+l, 0-l-0-4i>fl, 0-2-3-4i>fl, 0-2-3-4i>f1), tarsi (0, 0, 0, 0-0-1- 0). Coloration: Carapace with two longitudinal symmetrical dark bands, irregularly expressed, margins narrowly darkened, head region darker, laterally with indistinct dark patches (Fig. 121). Chelicerae frontally without dark patches. Sternum darkened, medially moderately paler (Fig. 119). Opisthosoma dark grayish, without red pigments, anteriorly with dark patch, bordered by yellowish bands, posteriorly with yellowish chevrons (Fig. 120). Legs very indistinctly annulated. Colulus pale. ALS pale, basal segment of PLS darkened, distal segment of PLS only proximally darkened (2/3). Distribution. — Reported from localities in the states of Nuevo Leon and Tamaulipas (Mexico). Comments. — One female and two males from different localities in Tamaulipas differ from E. gertschi s. s. by the different vulva with an apparently fused duct (Figs. 73, 74), and the narrow and pointed distal sclerite of the MA (Figs. 78-80). Due to the fact that: (i) the species group in focus comprises a complex of very closely related species, (ii) the males and female were not collected at the same locality and (iii) only one female is available, these morphs are not described as a new species and treated here as E. cf. gertschi. Eratigena guanato sp. nov. http://zoobank.org/?lsid=urn:lsid:zoobank. org:act:9AC79754-8337-4AC5-97A2-387C757A78C2 Figs. 126-137 Type material. — Holotype female. MEXICO: Guanajuato: Guanajuato, at road 110 from Dolores Hidalgo to Guana¬ juato, 1 km N of Santa Rosa de Lima, 2510 m, oak forest, 16 October 2014, A. Bolzern, E. Gonzalez Santillan (FC-UNAM: AB1260). Paratypes. MEXICO: Guanajuato: 5 juv., same data as holotype (FC-UNAM: AB1260); 3 $, 3 juv., same data (NMB-ARAN-27509: AB1243: accession-nr. LN887176). Other material examined (of E. guanato s. s.). — MEXICO: Unknown: 1 ?, 280 Cueva las Calevas, 6 April 1941, Mich (AMNH: AB1130). Colima: 1 ?, Nevado de Colima, 20 January 1943, F. Bonet (AMNH: AB1126). Jalico: 1 $, Mascota, km 21at street from Mascota to Puerto Vallarta, 1662 m, pine forest, night catch, 1 April 2012, L. Olguin, J. Mendoza, G. Contreraz, C. Santibahez, D. Ortiz (CNAN). Michoacdn: 1 6 , Basencheve National Park, 7 May 1963, W.J. Gertsch, W. Ivie (AMNH: AB1103); 1 9, Garnica Pass, 2834 m, 8 May 1963, W.J. Gertsch, W. Ivie (AMNH: ABl 127); 1 9 , Cd. Hidalgo, Gruta de Tziranda, 1855 m, 29 April 2011, A. Valdez, O. Francke, J.A. Cruz, R. Monjaraz, E. Miranda (CNAN); 1 9 , Zitacuaro, ca. 30 km SE of Zitacuaro, Butterfly forest, 2896 m, 16 December 2011, S. Huber (NMB-ARAN- 27510: AB1089). Other material examined (of E. cf. guanato), — MEXICO: Hidalgo: 2 9,5 miles SW. of Jacala, 21 April 1963, W.J. Gertsch, W. Ivie (AMNH: 1176). Michoacdn: 1 9, Coalco- man, Cueva de Cascada Chica, 10 km NE Coalcoman de Matamoros, 1356 m, 1 May 1984, L. Elliott, D. McKenzie (AMNH: ABl 100); 1 9, 15 km NE. of Coalcoman de Matamoros, Cueva de Torrecillas, 2 May 1984, D. McKenzie, L. Elliot (AMNH: ABl 108). Etymology. — The specific name is a noun in apposition shortened from the type locality. Diagnosis. — Males of E. guanato sp. nov. can be separated from all other related species by the distally hook-shaped dorsal branch of the RTA (Fig. 136), and the lateral margin folded only towards the terminal end of the distal portion of the conductor (arrow in Fig. 136). Females are similar to specimens of E. gertschi, E. rothi, E. tlaxcala, and E. xilitla sp. nov. but differ in having the posterior sclerite distinctly dumbbell-shaped (Figs. 130, 131; rather than posterior margin almost straight), and differ from E. rothi and E. xilitla sp. nov. in having the AME only as large as the PME, and differ from E. gertschi in having the distal segment of the PMS not twice as long as the basal segment (Fig. 129). Description. — Measurements: Male (ABl 127): CL 2.73, CW 2.2, STL 1.2, STW 1.22, OL 2.93, OW 1.83. Leg I (3.73, 0.92, 3.4, 3.7, 2.23), II (3.33, 0.87, 2.9, 3.47, 2.13), III (3.2, 0.8, 2.44, 3.37, 2.1), IV (3.7, 0.84, 3.56, 4.5, 2.4), Pedipalp (1.22, 0.42, 0.72, 1.1), bulbL 0.52. Female (holotype): CL 3.53, CW 2.6, STL 1.6, STW 1.58, OL 4.95, OW 3.75. Leg I (4.45, 1.35, 3.85, 3.9, 2.0), II (4.0, 1.2, 3.5, 3.73, 1.87), III (3.6, 1.15, 2.8, 3.6, 1.73), IV (4.7, 1.2, 4.05, 5.15, 2.0). Pedipalp (1.6, 0.733, 1.03, 1.47). EPL 0.33, EPW 0.58. Eyes: anterior eye row straight, posterior moderately procurved (Fig. 127). PME 0.19, PLE 0.21, AME 0.17, ALE 0.19. Eye distances: PME-PME 1 x PME, PME-AME 0.8-1 x PME, PME-PLE 1 x PME, PME- ALE 1.2 X PME, AME-AME 1 x AME, AME-ALE 0.5-0.75 X AME. CLYl 2-2.5 x AME, CLY2 1.2-1. 5 x ALE. Male pedipalp: RTA with two branches, lateral branch simple, broadly lobe-like, dorsal branch distally hook-shaped (Fig. 136). Short dorsal spike on palpal tibia absent. Embolus length about 1.5 x CB, originating at 10 o’clock position, distal tip at 4 o’clock position. Conductor lamelliform, distal portion only moderately elongated, lateral margin only moderately folded towards terminal end (arrow in Fig. 136). Terminal end of conductor strongly elongated, pointed. Transversal ridge of conductor expressed as hyaline ridge, indistinct. Conductor membranously connected to tegulum. MA originating at 6-7 o’clock position, protruding, longer than wide, distal sclerite translucent, subtriangular, moder¬ ately pointed. MA membranously connected to tegulum. Epigyne and vulva: Epigynal hyaline area with anterior border m-shaped (Fig. 105). Posterior sclerite protruding anteroven- trally as dumbbell-shaped moderately sclerotized bar (Figs. 130, 131), posterior membrane moderately protruding ante- riad (Fig. 134). CO anterolateral to posterior sclerite. Epigynal ‘pseudo teeth’ prominent (Fig. 131). Vulva consists of combined narrowly convoluted duct, CD less sclerotized, with distinct appendages, RC stronger sclerotized (Figs. 133, 134). FD only represented by small, leaf-shaped appendages. Other important characters: Cheliceral promargin with 4, retromar- gin with7 small teeth, more proximally, the teeth become JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY smaller. Colulus developed as trapezoidal plate with distal margin moderately w-shaped. PMS bearing one conspicuously prominent spigot. PLS with distal segment longer than basal segment (4/3; Fig. 129). Tarsal trichobothria at leg I 8. Small teeth on paired claws of leg I 11. Leg spination: male pedipalp (3-0-0, 2-0-0, 1-1+lp-O), female pedipalp (2-0-0, 2-0-0, 2-1+lp- 0), leg femora (1-3- 1-0 or 1-1 -3-0 in male, 1-2- 1-0 or 1 -2-3-0 in male, l-l-l-O or 1-4-3-0 in male, l-O-l-O or 1-2-1-0 in male), patellae (all 2-0-0), tibiae (O-O-O-O or 1 -0-0-0 or 0-0-0- 1 in male, l-O-O-O or l-l-O-l in male, 2-1-0-1 or 2-2-2-3p in male, 2-1-0-1 or 2-2-2- lp+l+2p in male), metatarsi (0-0-0-4p-(-l or 0-0-2- 2p+2+Ip+l in male, 0-0-0-4p+l or 0-2-0-4p4-l in male, 0-3-2- 4p+l, 0-3-2-4p+l or 0-4-4- 1 44 p+1 in male), tarsi (0, 0, 0-0- 1-0 or 0-0-2-0 in male, 0-0- 1-0 or 0-0-2-0 in male). Coloration: Carapace with two longitudinal symmetrical dark bands, irregularly expressed, margins narrowly to broadly darkened (Fig. 126). Chelicerae frontally with indistinct dark patches (Fig. 127). Sternum darkened, with pale median band, midway interrupted, posteriorly with black patch (Fig. 128). Opistho- soma grayish with dark spots, without reddish pigments, indistinct grayish median band, anteriorly with dark fork¬ shaped patch, posteriorly with grayish chevrons (Fig. 126). Legs distinctly annulated. Colulus medially and laterally with dark patches. ALS basally darkened, basal segment of PLS darkened, distal segment of PLS only proximal half darkened. Distribution. — Reported from four states of East-Central Mexico: Colima, Guanajuato, Jalisco and Michoacan. Comments. — Male and female specimens were not collected together and show moderate morphological differences (e.g., size, leg spination) and are therefore only tentatively placed in the same species. The females collected close to Jacala and Coalcoman show some morphological differences to the type specimens. If these differences are part of intraspecific variation or a closely related taxa cannot satisfyingly be judged here. Therefore, the identification of these specimens remains uncertain. Eratigena mexicana (Roth, 1968), comb. nov. Figs. 138-149 Tegenaria flexuosa Roth, 1952: 285, figs. 1, 2 (in part, misidentified female). Tegenaria mexicana Roth, 1968: 15, figs. 21-26. Type material. — Holotype male. MEXICO: Guerrero: Tax- co, in cave, 29 July 1956, V. Roth, W. Gertsch (AMNH). Paratypes. 1 9 allotype, same data as holotype (AMNH); 2 6, same data (AMNH: AB1178); 5 fl, 0-2-2-4i>fl or 0-3-2-4f>fl, 0-3-2-4p+l or 0-3-3- lp-|-!-|-2p+l), tarsi (0, 0, 0, 0-0- 1-0 or 0-1 -3-0). Coloration: Carapace with two well expressed longitudinal symmetrical dark bands, margins narrowly to broadly darkened, head region dorsolaterally with two distinct, longitudinally curved dark bands (Fig. 150). Chelicerae frontally with indistinct dark patches (Fig. 151). Sternum darkened, with pale median band, midway interrupted (Fig. 152). Opisthosoma grayish with dark spots, median band with reddish pigments, anteriorly with dark patch, posteriorly with chevrons (Fig. 150). Legs annulated, ventrally more distinctly expressed as dorsally. Colulus moderately darkened. ALS basally and laterally darkened, basal segment of PLS distinctly darkened, distal segment of PLS only proximal half darkened. Distribution. — Reported from only a narrow area in the state of Queretaro (Mexico). Comments. — Specimens of E. queretaro sp. nov. were collected at three different sites in a relatively narrow area. The most natural habitat was at the path from Rio Blanco to the Cueva Puerto del Leon in an old oak forest. There, in a shady valley, the spiders built their webs between rocks near a small creek. In contrast, representatives of this species were also collected in a tube with running water under a road (Fig. 6) within an area with subtropical to mountainous transitional forest. Eratigena rothi (Gertsch, 1971), comb. nov. Figs. 162-173 Tegenaria rothi Gertsch, 1971: 107, figs. 161-163. Type material. — Holotype male. MEXICO: Hidalgo: Cueva de El Ocote, 1.5 km N. of Palomas, 20 July 1956, V. Roth, W.J. Gertsch (AMNH). Other material. — MEXICO: Hidalgo: 1 cJ, 4 9, Jacala, collected in cave at night, 20 July 1956, V. Roth, W.J. Gertsch (AMNH: AB1173); 1 <5,5 9, same data except roadside cave, 1 mile N. of Palomas (AMNH: AB1157, AB1172); 3 9, 10-25 miles S. of Jacala, 1 July 1956, V. Roth, W. Gertsch (AMNH: AB1170); 1 d, 6 9, same data except 20 July 1956 (AMNH: AB1174, AB1175); 2 S, Tlanclnnol, 43 km SW. of Huejutla, 1500 m, cloud forest, 14 August 1983, S. & J. Peck (AMNH: AB1138); 2 9,2 km N. of del Pinalito, El Cardenal, 2301 m, coniferous forest, day catch, 16 October 2009, O. Francke, R. Paredes, J. Cruz, T. Lopez, T. Palafox, C. Santibanez, A. Valdez (CNAN: AB1201); 3 9, 7 juv., Zimapan, at street from Morelos (Trancas) to Puerto de Piedra, 2405 m, pine forest, at terrain break near street, at rocks, 10 October 2014, A. Bolzern, E. Gonzalez Santillan (FC-UNAM: AB1211, AB1221, AB1270); 2 9, Nicolas Flores, close to El Endnote, at street from Morelos (Trancas) to Puerto de Piedra, 2557 m, pine forest, at terrain break near street, at rocks, 10 October 2014, A. Bolzern, E. Gonzalez Santillan (FC-UNAM: AB1257, AB1297); 1 9, same data except Puerto de Piedra, Santa Cueva, 2498 m, at rocks at cave entrance (NMB- ARAN-27519: AB1298: accession-nr. LN887156, LN887189); 3 <5,7 9, 4 juv., Chapulhuacan, between Puerto Chaballo and Chapuluacan, near road 85, 1087 m, in tube with running water under road, 10 October 2014, A. Bolzern, E. Gonzalez Santillan (NMB-ARAN-27520 to 27524: AB1212, AB1228, 120 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY AB1241, AB1263, AB1210: accession-nr. LN887157, LN887190). Diagnosis. — Male and female specimens of E. rothi are very similar to E. xilitla sp. nov. and differ from all other West Nearctic ErcUigena species in having the AME larger than the PME. They differ from the sister species, E. xilitla sp. nov., in their larger size (CL longer than 4.5 mm; rather than smaller than 4 mm in E. xilitla sp. nov.). Males differ from E. xilitla sp. nov. by the shape of the distal sclerite of the MA (Fig. 167; long subtriangular and pointed, rather than spoon-shaped and rounded), and females differ by the shape of the posterior sclerite (Fig. 170). Description. — Essential information was provided by Gertsch (1971). Distribution. — Reported from several localities in the north¬ western part of the state of Hidalgo (Mexico). Comments. — Morphologically, the two species E. rothi and E. xilitla sp. nov. are very closely related. This sister-species relationship is supported by the maximum likelihood tree based on mitochondrial sequences (Fig. 1). Specimens of E. rothi were collected during an excursion in 2014 from three different habitats: pine forest at terrain break, at a huge cave entrance between rocks and in a tube with running water under a road. E. xilitla sp. nov. seems to preferably inhabit oak-pine forests, but otherwise similar habitats. Eratigem selva (Roth, 1968), comb. nov. Figs. 174-194 Tegenaria mexicana selva Roth, 1968: 23, figs. 28, 29. Tegenaria selva Roth: Gertsch, 1971: 105. Type material. — Holotype male. MEXICO: San Luis Potosi: Cueva de la Selva, west of Xilitla on the Xilitla-Ahuacatlan road, north of Tamazunchale, 10 April 1966, T. Raines (AMNH). Paratypes. 1 9 allotype, Sotano at Valle de los Fantasmas, 24 November 1966, J. Fish, J. Davis (AMNH: AB1131). Other material examined. — MEXICO: Hidalgo-. 1 S, Sotano de la Hoya de las Vigas, 1.5 km N Pinalito, 22 March 1981, J. Reddell, T. Archery (AMNH: AB1107); 1 9, La Sotono del Hondo de Pinalito, Hwy 85, 1 January 1976, C. Soileau, P. Strickkand (AMNH: AB1144). San Luis Potosr. 19,5 km N Valle de Los Fantasmas, 40 km E Zaragoza, Cueva de la Laguna, 3000 m, 20 May 1972, Wm. Elliott, P. Lynn, R.M. McEachern (AMNH: ABllOl); 1 6, Cueva Pueblo Ilamado, 58 km Mpio Villa de Zaragoza, 2298 m, pine-oak forest, date unknown, A. Valdez, O. Francke, J. Cruz, C. Santibahez (CNAN: AB1197); 1 9, Gruta de los Muertes, Xilitla Plateau, 28 March 1900, D. Pate (AMNH: AB1158); 3 9, Sotanade La Silleta, 30 March 1980, D. Honea (AMNH, AB1109); 2 9, Municipio de Zaragoza, Cueva de los Caballos, 30 km E San Luis Potosi, 3000 m, 18 May 1972, Wm. Elliott (AMNH: AB1146); 4 9, Sierra del Pina, Microwave Tower Road, La Cueva de los Murcielagos, 29 December 1975, C. Soileau, P. Strickkand (AMNH: AB1147); 1 9, Sotano de Abernathy, W. of Valle de los Fantasmos, 30 January 1969, Wm. Elliott, D. Honea, M. Abernathy (AMNH: AB1I60); 1 9, Sotano de Aranas, W of Valle de los Fantasmas, 29 January 1969, R. Harmon, J. Cepeda (AMNH: AB1132); 1 c?, 3 9, Sotano de Golondrina, Puerto Altamira, 40 km E San Luis Potosi, 3000 m, 17 March 1972, Wm. Elliott, R. Mitchell, J.A.L. Cooke, G. Campell, G. Graves, M. Brownfield (AMNH: ABl 151); 2 5 mm, patella-tibia length leg I > 9 mm) and an indistinctly patterned abdomen (grayish). In addition, females differ by having a very strongly sclerotized epigynal posterior sclerite (Figs. 182, 191). Description. — Essential information was provided by Roth (1968). Distribution. — Reported from the north-western part of the state of Hidalgo and the state of San Luis Potosi (Mexico). Comments. — Even though the type locality of E. selva (Cueva de la Selva, now called Cueva del Salitre) was revisited during an excursion in October 2014, no specimens or webs could be detected there. The specimens from Sotano de Golondrina (ABl 151) are morphologically very similar to typical E. selva specimens, but differ to some extent in epigynal and genital morphology (Figs. 186-188, 191-194). However, due to the lack of more information (more specimens with these features, DNA data) these specimens are here treated as a variation of E. selva. Eratigena tlaxcaia (Roth, 1968), comb. nov. Figs. 195-206 Tegenaria mexicana tlaxcaia Roth, 1968: 24. Tegenaria tlaxcaia Roth: Brignoli, 1974: 230. Type material. — Holotype male. MEXICO: Tlaxcaia-. Tlax- cala, in underground water conduit, 26 July 1956, V. Roth, W. Gertsch (AMNH). Paratypes. 1 9 allotype, same data as holotype (AMNH); 3 (J, 1 9, same data (AMNH: ABl 171). Other material examined (of E. tlaxcaia s. s.). — MEXICO: Distrito Federal-. 1 9 , Gustavo A. Madero, Canada hacia la cueva del Fraile, 2614 m, 25 June 2009, H. Montano, A. Valdez, R. Paredes, T. Garrido (CNAN: CNAN-Ar009746). Mexico-. 1 (?, 58 km E. of Mexico City, pine forest, under log, 24 July 1956, V. Roth, W. Gertsch (AMNH: ABl 162). Puebla-. 1 (5, Huachinango, 4.4 miles SW. of Huachinango, 1700 m, moist ravine oak forest, malt traps, 25 July 1969, collector unknown (AMNH: ABl 110); 1 S, pyramid at Cholula, 20 August 1965, J. Reddell, J. Fish, W. Bell (AMNH: ABl 1 13); 1 9, San Pedro Cholula, at northern slope of hill NE. of Cholula, 2221 m, pine forest, small cave, 8 October 2014, A. Bolzern, E. Gonzalez Santillan (NMB-ARAN-27525: AB1271: accession-nr. LN887159, LN887I91); 1 9, W. of Rio Frio, 2956 m, 22 August 1964, W. & J. Ivie (AMNH: ABl 111). Tlaxcaia-. 5 9, 2 juv., Tlaxcaia, Ocatlan, Barage Chapitel, within city in an open space between houses, 2222 m, old manmade tunnel/cave under the city, at the entrance (which was a dump), 9 October 2014, A. Bolzern, E. Gonzalez Santillan (FC-UNAM: AB1229, AB1242, AB1296; NMB- ARAN-27526: AB1233: accession-nr. LN887158, LN887192). BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 121 Other material examined (of E. cf. tlaxcala). — MEXICO: Guerrero: 1 6, Tetipan, 5 km E de Casahuates, 2275 m, pine- oak forest, 4 June 2010, O. Francke, D. Barrales, J. Cruz, A. Valdez (CNAN; AB1196). Diagnosis. — Males of E. tlaxcala are similar to specimens of E. caverna, E. fernandoi sp. nov., E. gertschi, E. selva (variation) and E. xilitla sp. nov. and differ from other species in having a spoon-shaped, distally rounded distal sclerite (Fig. 195,197; rather than subtriangular or triangular and distally pointed). Males and females differ from E. caverna and E. xilitla sp. nov. in having normally developed eyes with the AME as large as the PME (Fig. 199; rather than all reduced in E. caverna, PME larger than AME in E. xilitla sp. nov.). Males differ from E. fernandoi sp. nov. and E. gertschi in having a narrow, distinctly longer then wide distal sclerite of the MA (Fig. 197; rather than broad), and from E. selva (variation) in having a conductor with an unevenly curved distal margin (arrow in Fig. 196; rather than evenly curved). Females are very similar to E. gertschi, E. giianato sp. nov., E. rothi and E. xilitla sp. nov., but differ from E. rothi and E. xilitla sp. nov. in having the AME as large as the PME, differ from E. guanato sp. nov. in having the posterior sclerite not distinctly dumbbell-shaped, and differ from E. gertschi in having the distal segment of the PLS not twice as long as the basal segment. Description. — Essential information was provided by Roth (1968). Distribution. — Reported from three states: Distrito Federal, Puebla and Tlaxcala (Mexico). Comments. — The specimen from Guerrero differs to some extent morphologically from typical E. tlaxcala specimens (e.g. shape of RTA and median apophysis) and its identifica¬ tion remains doubtful. Eratigena xilitla sp. nov. http://zoobank.org/?lsid=urn:lsid:zoobank. org:act:A9F274FD-3456-4D7F-8A21-B9DF2B9B5DB8 Figs. 207-218 Type material. — Holotype male. MEXICO: San Luis Potosv. Xilitla, at road from Xilitla to Las Adjuntas, Cueva del Aqua, 451 m, near cave entrance at rock surfaces, 12 October 2014, A. Bolzern, E. Gonzalez Santillan (FC-UNAM: AB1219: accession-nr. LN887161, LN887I80).. Paratypes. 19,2 juv., same data as holotype (FC-UNAM: AB1219: accession-nr. LN887161, LN887180); 19,4 juv., same data (NMB-ARAN-27527: AB1301). Other material. — MEXICO: Hidalgo: 2 9, 2.5 km N. of junction Zacualtipan-Santiago Tianguistengo, 2101 m, pine forest, 6 November 2010, A. Valdez, O. Francke, J. Cruz, C. Santibanez, E. Miranda (CNAN: AB1195). Puebla: 2 9, 1 juv., Ajalpan, street between Pala and Nicolas Bravo, 2653 m, oak-pine forest, at terrain break at steep slope near path in the forest, 7 October 2014, A. Bolzern, E. Gonzalez Santillan (NMB-ARAN-27528 to 27529: AB1278, AB1287: accession- nr. LN887160, LN887179); 1 9, same data except 2619 m (FC-UNAM: AB1246). San Luis Potosi: 1 9, Tamazunchale, 6 July 1941, L.I. Davis (AMNH: AB1125). Queretaro: 19,2 juv., Pinal de Amoles, at road 120 between Jalpan de Serra and Pinal de Amoles, close to La Curva del Chuveje, 20 km W. of Jalpan, 1288 m, transitional forest, subtropical to moun¬ tainous, in tube with running water under road, 13 October 2014, A. Bolzern, E. Gonzalez Santillan (FC-UNAM: AB1235). Veracruz: 1 d, 4 9, 10 miles W. of Jalapa, volcanic cave in pine forest, 26 July 1956, V. Roth, W. Gertsch (AMNH: AB1164); 1 9, Acejete, 1 km NE. of La Joya, 2204 m, 30 October 2006, O. Francke, A. Valdez, C. Santibanez (CNAN: AB1194); 1 d, 1 9, 2 juv., Coatepec, village park, 1265 m, 10 December 2010, S. Huber (NMB-ARAN-27530: AB1090); 1 (?, Huatusco, 7 km E. of Huatusco, cloud forest, 22 June 1983, S. & J. Peck (AMNH: AB1136). Etymology. — The specific name is a noun in apposition taken from the type locality. Diagnosis. — Male and female specimens of E. xilitla sp. nov. are very similar to E. rothi and differ from all other West Nearctic Eratigena species in having the AME larger than the PME. They differ from the sister species, E. rothi, in their smaller size (CL shorter 4 mm; rather than longer than 4.5 mm in E. rothi). Males differ from E. rothi sp. nov. by the shape of the distal sclerite of the MA (Figs. 207, 209; spoon-shaped and rounded, rather than long subtriangular and pointed), and females differ by the shape of the posterior sclerite (Fig. 215). Description. — Measurements: Male (holotype): CL 3.13, CW 2.47, STL 1.44, STW 1.36, OL 3.37, OW 1.7. Leg I (5.48, 1.33, 5.35, 6.15, 3.15), II (4.4, 1.1, 4.15, 4.95, 2.65), III (4.0, 1.0, 3.33, 4.5, 2.25), IV (5.35, 1.16, 4.75, 6.5, 3.33), Pedipalp (1.6, 0.54, 0.82, 1.36), bulbL 0.5. Female (paratype): CL 3.17, CW 2.4, STL 1.4, STW 1.36, OL 4.0, OW 2.9. Leg I (4.2, 1.1, 3.85, 4.0, 2.15), II (3.45, 1.08, 2.83, 3.1, 1.75), III (3.3, 1.0, 2.47, 3.1, 1.63), IV (4.22, 1.03, 3.5, 4.2, 2.03). Pedipalp (1.4, 0.54, 0.88, 1.32). EPL 0.31, EPW 0.67. Eyes: eye rows moderately procurved (Fig. 212). PME 0.16, PLE 0.18, AME 0.18, ALE 0.18. Eye distances: PME-PME 0.8 x PME, PME- AME 1 X PME, PME-PLE 1 x PME, PME-ALE 1.3 x PME, AME-AME 0.3 x AME, AME-ALE 0.3 x AME. CLYl 1 .2 x AME, CLY2 1 X ALE. Mcde pedipalp: RTA with two branches, lateral branch subtriangular lobe-like, moderately ventrad protruding, dorsal branch strongly finger shaped, distally truncated (Fig. 209). Short dorsal spike on palpal tibia absent. Embolus length about 1.4 x CB, originating at 9-10 o’clock position, distal tip at 3 o’clock position. Conductor lamelliform, distal portion only moderately elongated, lateral margin folded. Terminal end of conductor strongly elongated, pointed. Transversal ridge of conductor expressed as indistinct hyaline ridge. Conductor membranously connected to teg- ulum. MA originating at 6 o’clock position, protruding, longer than wide, distal sclerite spoon-shaped, rounded (Figs. 207- 209). MA membranously connected to tegulum. Epigyne and vulva: Epigyne medially with a pale, hyaline area, long oval. Posterior sclerite protruding anteroventral as moderately sclerotized bar, dumbbell-shaped (Fig. 215), posterior mem¬ brane strongly protruding anteriad and notched (Fig. 218). CO anterolateral to posterior sclerite. Epigynal ‘pseudo teeth’ prominent (Fig. 215). Vulva consists of combined narrowly convoluted duct, CO less sclerotized with distinct appendages (Figs. 217, 218). FD only represented by small, leaf-shaped appendages. Other important characters: Cheliceral promargin with 4-5, retromargin with 7-1 1 small teeth, more proximally, the teeth become smaller. Colulus developed as trapezoidal plate with distal margin moderately w-shaped. PMS bearing one conspicuously prominent spigot. PLS with distal segment 122 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY longer than basal segment (3/2; Fig. 214). Trichobothria on cymbium and palpal tarsus absent. Tarsal trichobothria at leg I 8. Small teeth on paired claws of leg I 8-9. Leg spination: male pedipalp (3-0-0 or 3-1-0, 2-0-0, 1-1-flp-O), female pedipalp (2-0-0, 2-0-0, 2-1+lp-O), leg femora (1-3-2-0 or 2-3- 2-0, 1 -3-2-0 or 2-3-2-0, 1 -2-2-0, 1 -2-2-0 or 2- 1-1-0), patellae (all 2-0-0), tibiae (l-l-O-O, or l-l-O-l, l-l-O-O, 2-1-1-1, 2-2-1-1 or 2- 2-2-1 or 2-2-2-2), metatarsi (0-0-0- 1 p+l+2p+l , 0-1-0- lp+l+2p-hl, 0-2-2- lpj-l+2p+l or 0-3~2-4p+l, 0-3-2-4p-f-l or 0-3-3-4p+l), tarsi (0, 0, O-O-l-O or 0-0-2-0, 0-1-2-0 or 0-1-3-0). Coloration: Carapace with two broad longitudinal symmetri¬ cal dark bands, margins narrowly to broadly darkened (Fig. 211). Sternum darkened, with pale median band with moderately serrated lateral margins (sometimes indistinct), posteriorly with indistinct black patch (Fig. 213). Opisthoso- ma dark brown, with distinct reddish median band with black spots, bordered by yellowish bands, posteriorly with yellowish chevrons (Fig. 211). Legs distinctly annulated, dorsally sometimes indistinct. Colulus laterally with dark patches. ALS basally and distally darkened, basal segment of PLS darkened, distal segment of PLS only proximal third darkened (Fig. 214). Distribution. — Reported from five states along the eastern mountain range (Sierra Madre Oriental): Hidalgo, Puebla, Queretaro, San Luis Potosf, and Veracruz (Mexico). Comments. — The specimens collected by Roth and Gertsch in 1956 were misidentified as T. tlaxcala (Roth, 1968: 25). See also comment for E. rotlii. DISCUSSION The result that the endemic species in the Nearctic region belong to both genera, Tegenaria and Eratigena, is surprising. This hypothesis would imply that either both genera originated earlier than the split of Laurasia (approximately 55 million years ago; Ellis & Stoker 2014), or that one or both of them invaded the continent later. The mexican Eratigena species can be split into the two described, well diagnosable groups: the //e.vnos'a-group and the mexicana-groxx^. Based on morphological data and mtDNA sequences, the mexicana-gxou'p is more complex with some very closely related species. Differences in male and female genitalia between species are sometimes hard to detect. That is why we even propose to use size as a character to separate species (Bolzern et al. 2013a). However, most species are well diagnosed by morphological and molecular data, although some specimen identifications remain uncertain due to the low number of available individuals (unknown magnitude of intraspecific variation) and the absence of molecular data for certain species. In addition to the species groups in focus, it is mentionable that (based on mtDNA sequences; Fig. 1) Textrix denticulata (Olivier, 1789) is placed outside Textrix Sundevall, 1833, that Agelena canariensis Lucas, 1838 is closely related to Agele- scape gideoni Levy, 1996 (and only distantly related to other Agelena Walckenaer, 1805 species), and that the Novalena Chamberlin & Ivie, 1942 specimens from Mexico represent a monophyletic clade apart from Novalena intermedia (Cham¬ berlin & Gertsch, 1930). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For the loan of the specimens included in this work, we are grateful to the institutions, curators and collection managers mentioned in the Methods section. We are very thankful to Siegfried Huber (Germany) and Leonel Perez Miguel (Mexico) for the donation of relevant specimens. We are deeply grateful to the Natural History Museum of Basel and its staff for the provision of equipment and technical support. We are grateful to Armin Coray for the generous loan of his microscope. Special thanks go to Edmundo Gonzalez Santillan and Fernando Alvarez Padilla (Mexico) for their great support before, during and after the fieldtrip to Mexico in 2014. We are also grateful to Enrique (last name unknown), Carmello Salinas and Antioco Salinas Sanchez for their guidance to the caves in Queretaro. We are thankful to Daniele Polotow, Jeremy Miller and Michael Rix for constructive comments and reviews of the manuscript. We are indebted to the following foundations for financial support: “Stiftung Emilia Guggen- heim-Schnurr der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Basel” and the “Kugler-Werdenberg-Stiftung des Naturhistorischen Mu¬ seum Basel”. Laboratory expenses were funded by the “Easier Stiftung fiir Biologische Forschung”. The field expedition was supported by the “Fritz-Sarasin-Stiftung der Freiwilligen Akademischen Gesellschaft”, the “Stiftung Dr. Joachim de Giacomi der Akademie der Naturwissenschaften Schweiz”, and the Vincent Roth Research Foundation of the American Arachnological Society. Funding for the collection of the new species (in part) was provided by UNAM-DGAPA-PAPIIT project IN2 13612. BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 123 Figures 8-16. — Tegeiuiria chiricahucie Roth, 1968, female (8-12) and male (13-16). 8, epigynal area, ventral view; 9, vulva, dorsal view; 10, same, dorsolateral view; 11, same, posterior view; 12, same, anterior view; 13, left male pedipalp, dorsoretrolateral view; 14, cymbium and bulb, prolateral view; 15, same, ventral view; 16, same, retrolateral view. C = conductor; CD = copulatory duct; CO^copulatory opening; DB = dorsal branch of RTA; E = embolus; FD = fertilization duct; PT = epigynal ‘pseudo teeth’; MA = median apophysis; R = lateroventral ridge of RTA; RC = receptaculum; RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis; T = tegulum; VB = ventral branch of RTA. 124 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 17-29. — Evatigemi edmimdoi sp. nov., female (17-22) and male (23-29). 17, habitus, dorsal view; 18, epigynal area, ventral view; 19, vulva, dorsal view; 20, same, posterior view; 21, same, anterior view; 22, same, dorsolateral view; 23, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 24, sternum ventral view; 25, spinnerets, ventral view; 26, bulb, prolatera! view; 27, same, ventral view; 28, same, retrolateral view; 29, left male pedipalp, retrolateral view. Scale of 1 7 = 2 mm; scale of 24 = 1 mm; scale of 23 = 0.5 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. CD = copulatory duct; DP = distal portion of conductor; DS = distal sclerite at MA; FD = fertilization duct; PM = Posterior membrane; PS = posterior sclerite; PT = epigynal ‘pseudo teeth’; RC = receptaculum; TR = transversal ridge at conductor. BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 125 Figures 30-41. — Eratigena flexuosa (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1902), male holotype (30-36) and female (37-41). 30, habitus, dorsal view; 31, sternum, ventral view; 32, spinnerets, ventral view; 33, cymbium and bulb, prolatera! view; 34, same, ventral view; 35, same, retrolateral view; 36, chelicerae, posterior view; 37, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 38, epigynal area, ventral view; 39, vulva, posterior view; 40, same, anterior view; 41, same, dorsal view. Scale of 30 = 2 mm; scale of 31, 37 = 1 mm; scale of 32, 36 = 0.5 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 42-53. — Eratigena florea (Brignoli, 1974), female (42-46) and male (47-53). 42, epigynal area, ventral view; 43, vulva, anterior view; 44, same, dorsolateral view; 45, same, dorsal view; 46, same, variation (specimen labeled ""prope" florea by Brignoli); 47, habitus, dorsal view; 48, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 49, sternum, ventral view; 50, spinnerets, ventral view; 51, cymbium and bulb, prolateral view; 52, same, ventral view; 53, same, retrolateral view. Scale of 47 = 2 mm; scale of 48-49 = 1 mm; scale of 50 = 0.5 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 127 Figures 54-65. — Eratigena yarini sp. nov., female holotype (54-62) and male paratype (63-65). 54, habitus, dorsal view; 55, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 56, sternum, ventral view; 57, spinnerets, ventral view; 58, epigynal area, ventral view; 59, vulva, anterior view; 60, same, dorsolateral view; 61, same, dorsal view; 62, same, posterior view; 63, cymbium and bulb, prolateral view; 64, same, ventral view; 65, same, retrolateral view. Scale of 54 = 2 mm; scale of 55-56 = 1 mm; scale of 57 = 0.5 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. 128 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 66-80. — Eratigem hlanda (Gertsch, 1971), female holotype (66-71), and Eratigena cf. gertschi, female (72-75), and male (76-80). 66, carapace and cheiicerae, anterior view; 67, spinnerets, ventral view; 68, epigynal area, ventral view; 69, vulva, posterior view; 70, same, anterior view; 71, same, dorsal view; 72, epigynal area, ventral view; 73, vulva, dorsal view; 74, same, dorsolateral view; 75, same, posterior view; 76, carapace and cheiicerae, anterior view; 77, pedipalp, retrolateral view; 78, bulb, prolateral view; 79, same, ventral view; 80, same, retrolateral view. Scale of 66, 76-77 = 1 mm; scale of 67 = 0.5 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 129 Figures 81-89. — Eratigena caverua (Gertsch, 1971), male holotype (81-84) and female allotype (85-89). 81, bulb, prolateral view; 82, same, ventral view; 83, same, retrolateral view; 84, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 85, epigynal area, ventral view; 86, vulva, posterior view; 87, same, dorsolateral view; 88, same, dorsal view; 89, same, anterior view. Scale of 84 = 1 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. 130 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 90-101. — Eraligena decora (Gertsch, 1971), male holotype (90-96) and female paratype (97-101). 90, habitus, dorsal view; 91, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 92, spinnerets, ventral view; 93, bulb, prolateral view; 94, same, ventral view; 95, same, retrolateral view; 96, pedipalp, retrolateral view; 97, epigynal area, ventral view; 98, vulva, posterior view; 99, same, anterior view; 100, same, dorsal view; 101, same, dorsolateral view. Scale of 90 = 2 mm; scale of 91, 96 = 1 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 131 Figures 102-113. — Eratigena femamioi sp. nov., female paratype (102-108) and male holotype (109-113). 102, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 103, sternum, ventral view; 104, spinnerets, ventral view; 105, epigynal area, ventral view; 106, vulva, dorsal view; 107, same, anterior view; 108, same, posterior view; 109, habitus, dorsal view; 110, pedipalp, retrolateral view; 1 11, bulb, prolateral view; 1 12, same, ventral view; 113, same, retrolateral view. Scale of 109 = 2 mm; scale of 102-103 = 1 mm; scale of 104, 1 10 = 0.5 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. 132 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 123 124 125 Figures 1 14-125. — Eratigena gertsclii (Roth, 1968), male holotype (1 14-1 18) and female (119-125). 1 14, cymbium and bulb, prolateral view; 115, bulb, ventral view; 1 16, same, retrolateral view; 1 17, pedipalp, same; 118, spinnerets, lateral view; 1 19, sternum, ventral view; 120, abdomen, dorsal view; 121, carapace, same; 122, epigynal area, ventral view; 123, vulva, anterior view; 124, same, dorsolateral view; 125, same, dorsal view. Scale of 120 = 2 mm; scale of 1 17, 119=1 mm; scale of 1 14 = 0.5 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEG EN ARIA AND ERATIGENA 133 Figures 126-137. — Eratigena gucmato sp. nov., female paratype (126-134), and male (135-137). 126, habitus, dorsal view; 127, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 128, sternum, ventral view; 129, spinnerets, ventral view; 130, epigynal area, ventral view; 131, same; 132, vulva, anterior view; 133, same, dorsolateral view; 134, same, dorsal view; 135, bulb, prolateral view; 136, same, ventral view; 137, same, retrolateral view. Scale of 126 = 2 mm; scale of 127-128 = 1 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. 134 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 138-149. — Eratigena me.xicana (Roth, 1968), male holotype (138-143) and female (144-148). Eratigena cf. mexicana, female (149) . 138, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 139, abdomen, dorsal view; 140, pedipalp, retrolateral view; 141, bulb, prolateral view; 142, same, ventral view; 143, same, retrolateral view; 144, sternum, ventral view; 145, epigynal area, ventral view; 146, vulva, anterior view; 147, same, dorsolateral view; 148, same, dorsal view; 149, same. Scale of 139-140 = 2 mm; scale of 138, 144 = 1 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 135 Figures 150-161. — Eiatigena queretaro sp. nov., female holotype (150-153, 155-158), female paratype (154), and male paratype (159-161). 150, habitus, dorsal view; 151, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 152, sternum, ventral view; 153, spinnerets, ventral view; 154-155, epigynal area, ventral view; 156, vulva, posterior view; 157, same, anterior view; 158, same, dorsal view; 159, bulb, prolateral view; 160, same, ventral view; 161, same, retrolateral view. Scale of 150 = 2mm; scale of 151-152 = 1 mm; scale of 153 = 0.5 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. 136 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 162-173. — Eratigeiui rothi (Gertsch, 1971), male holotype (162-169), and female (170-173). 162, abdomen, dorsal view; 163, carapace, same; 164, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 165, cymbium and bulb, prolateral view; 166, bulb, ventral view; 167, same, retrolateral view; 168, sternum, ventral view; 169, spinnerets, ventral view; 170, epigynal area, same; 171, vulva, anterior view; 172, same, posterior view; 173, same, dorsal view. Scale of 162-164, 168 = 1 mm; scale of 165, 169 = 0.5 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. 171 165 172 162 164 BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 137 Figures 174-185. — Eratigena selva (Roth, 1968), male holotype (174-178), female (AB1158, 179-185). 174, bulb, prolateral view; 175, same, ventral view; 176, same, retrolateral view; 177, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 178, pedipalp, retrolateral view; 179, sternum, ventral view; 180, abdomen, dorsal view; 181, spinnerets, ventral view; 182, epigynai area, ventral view; 183, vulva, posterior view; 184, same, anterior view; 185, same, dorsal view. Scale of 177-178, 180 = 2 mm; scale of 179 = I mm; scale of 181 = 0.5 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. 138 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 186-194. — Variation of Eratigena selva (Roth, 1968), male (186-189), and female (190-194) from Sotano de Golondrina (AB1151). 186, bulb, prolateral view; 187, same, ventral view; 188, same, retrolateral view; 189, pedipalp, same; 190, spinnerets, ventral view; 191, epigynal area, ventral view; 192, same, dorsolateral view; 193, same, anterior view; 194, same, dorsal view. Scale of 189 = 1 mm; scale of 190 = 0.5 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. Figures 195-206. — Eratigena tlaxcala (Roth, 1968), male holotype (195-197), and female (198-207). 195, bulb, prolateral view; 196, same, ventral view; 197, same, retrolateral view; 198, abdomen, dorsal view; 199, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 200, sternum, ventral view; 201, spinnerets, ventral view; 202, epigynal area, ventral view; 203, vulva, dorsal view; 204, same, posterior view; 205, same, anterior view; 206, same, variation, dorsal view. Scale of 198, 200 = 2 mm; scale of 199 = 1 mm; scale of 201 = 0.5 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 204 205 203 Figures 207-218. — Eratigena xilitia sp. nov., male holotype (207-210), and female paratype (21 1-218). 207, bulb, prolateral view; 208, same, ventral view; 209, same, retrolateral view; 210, pedipalp, same; 211, habitus, dorsal view; 212, carapace and chelicerae, anterior view; 213, sternum, ventral view; 214, spinnerets, same; 215, epigynal area, same; 216, vulva, posterior view; 217, same, anterior view; 218, same, dorsal view. Scale of 21 1 =2 mm; scale of 212-213 = 1 mm; scale of 210, 214 = 0.5 mm; scale of other images = 0.2 mm. BOLZERN & HANGGI— NEARCTIC TEGENARIA AND ERATIGENA 141 LITERATURE CITED Bolzern, A. 2014. Agelenids of the World. Accessed 30 October 2015. Online at http://agelenidsoftheworld.myspecies.info Bolzern, A., & C. Herve. 2010. A new funnel-web spider species (Araneae: Agelenidae, Tegenaria) from Mercantour National Park, France. Arachnology 15:21-26. Bolzern, A., D. Burckhardt & A. Hanggi. 2013a. Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the Tegenar¬ ia— Mahhonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon mor¬ phological and molecular data. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 168:723-848. Bolzern, A., L. Crespo & P.B. Cardoso. 2009. Two new Tegenaria species (Araneae: Agelenidae) from Portugal. Zootaxa 2068:47-58. Bolzern, A., A. Hanggi & D. Burckhardt. 2010. Aterigena, a new genus of funnel-web spider, shedding some light on the Tegenaria- Malthonica problem (Araneae: Agelenidae). Journal of Arachnol¬ ogy 38:162-182. Bolzern, A., P. Pantini & M. Isaia. 2013b. Revision of the Histopona italica group (Araneae: Agelenidae), with the description of two new species. Zootaxa 3640:23^1. Bosmans, R. 2011. On some new or rare spider species from Lesbos, Greece (Araneae: Agelenidae, Amaurobiidae, Corinnidae, Gna- phosidae, Liocranidae). Arachnologische Mitteilungen 40:15-22. Brignoli, P. 1974. Notes on spiders, mainly cave-dwelling, of southern Mexico and Guatemala (Araneae). Quaderno Accademia Nazio- nale dei Lincei 171:195-238. Ellis, D. & M.S. Stoker. 2014. The Faroe-Shetland Basin: a regional perspective from the Paleocene to the present day and its relationship to the opening of the North Atlantic Ocean. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 397:1-21. Folmer, O., M. Black, W. Hoeh, R. Lutz, R. Vrijenhoek. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3:294-299. Gertsch, W. 1971. A report on some Mexican cave spiders. Association for Mexican Cave Studies Bulletin 4:47-111. Goloboff, P., J. Farris & K. Nixon. 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24:774-786. Hedin, M.C. & W.P. Maddison. 2001. A combined molecular approach to phylogeny of the jumping spider subfamily Dendry- phantinae (Araneae: Salticidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18:386-403. Kluge, N.J. 2007. Case 3371. ARANEIDAE Clerck, 1758, Araneus Clerck, 1758 and Tegenaria Latreille, 1804 (Arachnida, Araneae): proposed conservation. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 64:15-18. Larkin, M.A., G. Blackshields, N.P. Brown, R. Chenna, P.A. McGettigan, H. McWilliam et al. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947-2948. Li, W., A. Cowley, M. Uludag, T. Gur, H. McWilliam, S. Squizzato et al. 2015. The EMBL-EBI bioinformatics web and programmatic tools framework. Nucleic Acids Research 210:1-5. Maddison, W.P. & D.R. Maddison. 2015. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.03. Online at http:// mesquiteproject.org Maya-Morales, J. & M.L. Jimenez. 2013. Rothilena (Araneae: Agelenidae), a new genus of funnel-web spiders endemic to the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico. Zootaxa 3718:441-466. Miller, J.A., A. Carmichael, M.J. Ramirez, J.C. Spagna, C.R. Haddad, M. Rezac et al. 2010. Phylogeny of entelegyne spiders: affinities of the family Penestomidae (NEW RANK), generic phylogeny of Eresidae, and asymmetric rates of change in spinning organ evolution (Araneae, Araneoidea, Entelegynae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55:786-804. Miller, M.A., W. Pfeiffer & T. Schwartz. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA: 1-8. Murphy, N.P., V.W. Framenau, S.C. Donnellan, M.S. Harvey, Y.-C. Park & A.D. Austin. 2006. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) using sequences from the 12S rRNA, 28S rRNA, and NADHl genes: implications for classification, biogeography, and the evolution of web building behavior. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38:583-602. Pickard-Cambridge, F.O. 1902. Arachnida - Araneidae and Opi- liones. Vol. II. In Biologia Centrali-Americana, Zoology. London. Roth, V.D. 1952. A review of the genus Tegenaria in North America (Arachnida: Agelenidae). Journal of the Washington Academy of Science 42:283-288. Roth, V.D. 1956. Taxonomic changes in the Agelenidae (Arachnida). The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 32:175-180. Roth, V.D. 1968. The spider genus Tegenaria in the Western Hemisphere (Agelenidae). American Museum Novitates 2323:1-33. Simon, C., F. Frati, A. Beckenbach, B. Crespi, H. Liu & P. Flook. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochon¬ drial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87:651-701. Sukumaran, J. & M.T. Holder. 2010. DendroPy: a Python library for phylogenetic computing. Bioinformatics 26:1569-1571. Sukumaran, J. & M.T. Holder. 2015. SumTrees: phylogenetic tree summarization. Version 4.0.0. Online at https://github.com/ jeetsukumaran/DendroPy Tamura, K., G. Stecher, D. Peterson, A. Filipski & S. Kumar. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30:2725-2729. Wheeler, T.J. & J.D. Kececioglu. 2007. Multiple alignment by aligning alignments. Bioinformatics 23:i559-i568. World Spider Catalog. 2015. World Spider Catalog version 16.5. Accessed 25 October 2015. Natural History Museum, Bern. Online at http://wsc.nmbe.ch Zwickl, D.J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph D. dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin. 115 pp. Manuscript received 18 November 2015, revised 16 February 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:142-147 The Mediterranean recluse spider Loxosceles vufescem (Dufour, 1820) (Araneae: Sicariidae) established in a natural cave in Thailand Narin Chomphuphuang*, Sureerat Deowanish', Chaowalit Songsangchote^, Varat Sivayyapram’, Panupong Thongprem^ and Natapot Warrit’; 'Center of Excellence in Entomology and Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand 10330. E-mail: natapot. w@chula.ac.th; “Spider Planet Research Center, 49/201 Sukhapiban 5 Soi 45 Rd., Orngean, Saimai district, Bangkok, Thailand 10220; ^Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Fathom, Thailand 73000 Abstract. Loxosceles rufescens (Dufour, 1820), the Mediterranean recluse spider, is a cosmopolitan species with toxic venom which can occasionally cause dermatological injuries in humans. Here, we report the finding of L. rufescens through intensive survey and exploration of six natural limestone caves in the western region of Thailand. These data provide the first direct evidence of L. rufescens living in large numbers in a natural habitat outside of their native Mediterranean range. Although the currently known distribution of L. rufescens in Thailand is quite narrow (the spiders were only found in one of the six caves explored), data on their biology and local habitat preferences are provided to better understand the colonization requirements of this species in the target area. Keywords: Cave, distribution, toxic, violin spider The genus Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe, 1832, the recluse or violin spiders, is one of two genera in the family Sicariidae (Araneae), comprising 107 species distributed around the world (Platnick 2015). They are notorious for their bites, which occasionally produce a suite of symptoms known as ‘loxoscelism’, characterised by severe necrotic dermatologic injuries (Swanson & Vetter 2006). One of the most well-known recluse species is the Mediterranean recluse spider, L. rufescens (Dufour, 1820). The original range of this species is in the circum-Mediterranean region, however it has been spread widely, most likely through accidental human transportation (Vetter 2008). It is now found in many temperate and tropical areas including the islands of the Atlantic, Madagascar, the Hawaiian islands, Australia, Mexico, and the United States (Gertsch & Ennik 1983). In Asia, L. rufescens has been reported in India (Tikader 1963), China (Chen & Gao 1990; Chen & Zhang 1991; Song et al. 1999), Russia (Dunin 1992), Taiwan (Song et al. 1999), Japan (Yaginuma 1940, 1986; Yoshikura 1987; Ono 2009), and South Korea (Namkung 2002). A recent molecular phylogenetic study of the L. rufescens complex suggested that L. rufescens might have occurred in Malaysia, although limited numbers of specimens were used for the study (only one female and two males) (Duncan et al. 2010). Here, we report the finding of a large population of L. rufescens in a natural habitat in Southeast Asia. We document the presence of L. rufescens in western Thailand, provide observations on its morphology, natural history, habitat and identification, and propose how it may have arrived in Thailand. METHODS We surveyed six natural limestone caves located in the Khao Wang Khmer area of Kanchanaburi province in the western part of Thailand (14°25'N, 98°52'E) on 18 April and 25 May 2015 (Figs. 1, 2). These caves are located in the conservation area of the Plant Genetic Conservation Project under the Royal Initiative of Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn (RSPG). Spiders were hand collected and specimens were preserved in 95% ethanol and transferred to the Center of Excellence in Entomology, Chulalongkorn University (Bangkok) for dis¬ section and identification. Spiders that appeared to be L. rufescens were examined to confirm their identity, and to provide morphological data on the population found in Thailand. The genitalia of females were dissected and cleared with a 3M KOH aqueous solution. An Olympus SZ60 stereoscope coupled with an Olympus digital camera (Camedia c-4040 zoom) was used to photo¬ graph the diagnostic features of the putative L. rufescens. All measurements (in millimeters) were carried out under an ocular micrometer in a stereomicroscope (Olympus: Zeiss Stemi DV4). Descriptions are based on one specimen for each sex; however, for the leg measurements (left legs), we also displayed measurements for an additional 5? and AS specimens (Table 1). The following abbreviations are used throughout the text: AME, anterior median eye/s; CL, carapace length; CW, carapace width (measured at the widest point); ED, endite; LA, labium; LE, lateral eye/s; SL, sternum length; SW, sternum width (measured at the widest point); and TL, total length. Specimens were identified in accordance with Greene et al. (2009). All voucher specimens (i.e., 10 9,4 S and 6 subadult juveniles) are deposited at the Chulalongkorn University Museum of Zoology (CUMZ), Bangkok (Thailand) for future analysis. SYSTEMATICS Family Sicariidae Keyserling, 1880 Genus Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe, 1832 Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe, 1832 in Lowe, 1832: 321. Full synonymy: see Gertsch & Ennik (1983) and Platnick (2015). 142 CHOMPHUPHUANG ET AL.— RECLUSE SPIDER IN THAILAND 143 Figure 1. — The ‘Death Railway’ trail (black dashed line), which is in close proximity to Tum-Wangpra cave (red spot) where specimens of Lo.xosceles rufesceiis were found. Yellow spots are caves that we explored without finding any L. rufescens. The inset picture on the top right is indicative of what remains of the railway nowadays, whereas the inset picture on the bottom right shows the locality of Tum-Wangpra cave. Figure 2. — A schematic outline of Tum-Wangpra cave located in the Khao Wang Khmer area of Kanchanaburi province, Thailand. Light green shading indicates areas where more than 100 L. rufescens individuals were found (residing mostly under scattered rocks on the ground), whereas yellow shading indicates areas with less than 100 individuals (and most specimens hiding in crevices on the cave walls). Dark grey areas depict the limestone cave boundaries, and light grey areas illustrate small limestone boulders that are accessible by humans. The red spot corresponds with the red arrow in Fig. 6, showing the exact location of the spider aggregation site. Type Species. — Scytodes rufescens Dufour, 1820, by subse¬ quent designation of Bonnet (1957). Remarks. — As is typical of the genus Lo.xosceles, all specimens examined from Thailand possessed the following suite of characters: carapace flattened, longer than wide with a deep fovea (Fig. 5); clypeus porrect (Fig. 5); legs long and slender; sternum longer than wide; and abdomen oblong bearing spine-like setae (Lotz 2012). A diagnostic character for the females of L. rufescens is the structure of the spermathecae, which are characterized by the presence of closely-spaced receptacles and wide, laterally brown, sclerotized copulatory tubes (Fig. 3). These features were found in all 10 female specimens examined. In addition, when we examined four male specimens, the palpal tibia length to height ratio was less than 2.0, the cymbium was about half to less than half the length of the tibia, the length of the cymbium was similar to that of the pulpal bulb, and the palpal bulb was globular with a thin embolus (Fig. 4). These male characters are generally diagnostic of L. rufescens (Lotz 2012), although not exclu¬ sively so (Duncan et al. 2010; Planas & Ribera 2015; Planas et al. 2015). Loxosceles rufescens (Dufour, 1820) (Figs. 3-5, 8, 9) Scytodes rufescens Dufour, 1820: 203, pi. 76, fig. 5. Full synonymy: see Platnick (2015). Material examined. — THAILAND: Kanchanaburi: 69, 3 subadult juveniles, Sai Yok district, Tum-Wangpra cave, 14°24'47"N, 98°51'43"E, 18 April 2015, hand collected, N. Chomphuphuang (CUMZ-AR-ARA-Sic.2015.1-9); 4 c?, 49, 144 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1. — Left leg and palp measurements of a single representative adult female and adult male of Loxosceles rufescens from Thailand, and averages and standard deviations of five additional females and four male specimens (all measurements are in millimeters). Leg formulas are provided. I II III IV Palp Female (CUMZ-AR-ARA-Sic.2015.1); leg formula: 2413 Femur 5.04 5.40 4.8 5.52 1.35 Patella 1.11 1.17 0.99 0.90 0.33 Tibia 5.28 6.56 4.80 5.46 0.87 Metatarsus 5.70 6.00 5.10 6.60 - Tarsus 1.38 1.25 1.00 1.25 1.08 Total 18.51 20.38 16.69 19.73 3.63 Male (CUMZ-AR-ARA-Sic.2015.10); leg formula; Femur 5.12 2413 7.00 4.74 5.52 1.41 Patella 1.17 1.05 0.90 1.05 0.30 Tibia 6.80 8.40 5.90 5.92 0.90 Metatarsus 6.63 8.63 6.10 7.25 - Tarsus 1.50 1.74 1.20 1.65 0.60 Total 21.22 26.82 18.84 21.39 3.21 Five adult females (CUMZ-AR-ARA-Sic. 201 5.2-6); leg formulas: 2143 Femur 4.29±0.99 4.56±0.99 3.96±0.86 4.38±0.99 0.93±0.32 Patella 0.90±0.21 0.87±0.36 0.92±0.19 0.86±0.17 0.37±0.05 Tibia 3.72±1.85 4.23±2.21 3.14±1.51 3.59±1.75 0.53±0.22 Metatarsus 4.28±1.28 4.70±1.36 4.06±1.07 4.44±1.37 - Tarsus 1.38±0.16 1.39±0.13 1.20±0.20 1.23±0.24 1.00±0.22 Total 15.24±3.54 16.52±3.96 13.78±3.07 15.13±3.29 2.65±0.42 Four adult males (CUMZ-AR-ARA-Sic. 2015. 10-13); leg formulas: 2143 Femur 5.06±0.55 6.18±0.95 4.54±0.56 4.88±0.82 i.05±0.24 Patella 1.02±0.14 0.94±0.30 1.08±0.35 0.96±0.08 0.38±0.10 Tibia 6.15±0.86 7.40±1.16 4.85±0.87 5.28±0.76 0.55±0.26 Metatarsus 5.86±0.72 7.26±1.35 5.30±0.79 6.29±0.83 - Tarsus 1.45±0.13 1.51±0.20 1.25±0.06 1.44±0.25 0.40±0.14 Total 14.51±8.78 17.11±10.84 12.91±7.97 14.05±8.60 1.95+1.21 3 subadult juveniles, same data except 25 May 2015 (CUMZ-AR-ARA-Sic.201 5. 1 0-20). Description. — Carapace flattened, longer than wide, with a deep fovea and porrect clypeus (Fig. 5); chelicerae joined basally, with an immovable, thumb-like extension on the medial apical surface and short fangs; six eyes in three diads; legs long and slender, with two tarsal claws bearing serrated bristles on a small onychium; female genitalia haplogyne, with single broad opening and two spermathecae. Female (CUMZ-AR-ARA-Sic.2015.1); TL = 8.1; CL = 3.6, CW = 3.2; eye diameter 0.15; AME-LE = 0.27; eye row strongly recurved; abdomen length = 4.26, width = 3.0; clypeus height = 0.32, SL = 1 .88, SW = 1 .59; LA = 0.78 long, 0.66 wide; ED = 1.29 long, 0.36 wide; leg formula: 2413; leg and palp measurements shown in Table 1 . Carapace and chelicerae light brown, anterior carapace with dark brown ‘violin’ pattern (Fig. 5); legs and palps pale yellow to orange covered by short black setae, female palp without claw; coxae and sternum pale Figures 3-4.— Diagnostic characters of Loxosceles rufescens: 3, female spermathecae (dorsal view); 4, male pedipalp. Scale bars = 0.15 mm (Fig. 3), 0.5 mm (Fig. 4). CHOMPHUPHUANG ET AL —RECLUSE SPIDER IN THAILAND 145 Figure 5. — Adult female Lo.xosceles rufesceus carapace (dorsal view). Scale bar = 1 mm. yellow, labium and endites brown; abdomen yellowish, covered with setae. Receptacles of spermathecae closely spaced; copulatory tubes wide with lateral brown sclerotized area (Fig. 3). Female variation-. A single female specimen (CUMZ-AR- ARA-Sic.2015.2) has two black spots on the posterior end of the carapace; subadults or recently molted individuals with pale pigment in the violin pattern. Male (CUMZ-AR-ARA-Sic.2015.10): TL = 5.10; CL = 2.68, CW = 2.40; eye diameter 0.09; AME-LE = 0.21; eye row strongly recurved; abdomen length = 3.00, width = 1.55; clypeus = 0.27; SL = 1.23, SW = 1.35; LA = 0.45 long, 0.51 wide; ED = 0.90 long, 0.33 wide; leg formula: 2413 (see discussion); leg and palp measurements shown in Table 1. Overall body and coloration similar to female except for the abdomen, which is distinctly smaller than that of the female. Palpal tibia length to height ratio less than 2.0; cymbium half of tibia length; cymbium as long as length of palpal bulb; bulb globular and embolus thin (Fig. 4). Eggs'. In the laboratory, we retrieved a silken egg sac from one female nine days after the collection date. The sac contained 24 eggs with egg diameters between 1.07-1.15 mm. The eggs took 23 days after the egg sac was deposited to hatch Figures 6-9. — Tum-Wangpra limestone cave, the locality where Lo.xosceles rufescens specimens were collected: 6, entrance to the cave (red arrow indicates the area where numerous L. rufescens were found); 7, cave surface (red arrows indicate L. rufescens retreats on the limestone ground); 8, flocculent web of L. rufescens on the crevice of the limestone ground; 9, L. rufescens clinging to the cave wall. 146 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY into spiderlings under an ambient temperature of 27°C and 70% relative humidity. Only 21 individuals successfully hatched (87% hatch rate). We measured the total body length of the spiderlings two days after they emerged from the egg sac, at which time they were between 1 .20-1 .68 mm (average 1.46 mm). Habitat: Of the six limestone caves and peripheral urban areas that we surveyed, L. nifescens were found in only one of the caves locally known as “Tum-Wangpra” (Fig. 2). This cave has two major areas that extended approximately 20-25 m from the cave entrance. The accessible area for humans is about 340 m" with an average height of 5 m above ground. The cave is partially accessible by sunlight at a distance of 5 m from the cave entrance, which is devoid of the spiders. The surface of the ground inside the cave is slightly warm (annual average air temperature = 27°C and annual average relative humidity = 81.6 %), and mainly covered with a dry loamy sand and bat guano (Fig. 6). A population of the Old World hog¬ nosed bat, Craseonycteris thonglongyai Hill, 1974 is also found inhabiting the cave. An intensive survey revealed that the spiders were aggregated in similar microhabitats throughout the cave (Figs. 7-9); they hid themselves in crevices on the walls (Fig. 9), or under scattered rocks on the ground (Fig. 7- 8) where they made small retreats of flocculent silk. Some individuals of L. nifescens also clung on rocks beneath other spiders’ webs. By counting the visible spiders, we determined that there might be approximately 500 or more L. nifescens individuals living in the cave. DISCUSSION L. nifescens is a cosmopolitan species widely distributed throughout the world (Platnick 2015). Although native to the Mediterranean region, the species has been spread to other areas by human activities (Harvey 1996). In Israel, L. nifescens is moderately common in houses and basements (Shulov et al. 1962). Greene et al. (2009) suggested that populations of the genus Loxosceles in the United States tend to be extremely dense in favorable urban environments such as steam tunnels and subterranean habitats. In Iran, L. nifescens is also found inside buildings and under rocks and logs in urban areas (Zamani & Rafinejad 2014). In the natural environment, Loxosceles populations can be found in caves and/or cavern¬ like habitats (see Newlands 1975; Gertsch & Ennik 1983; Griffin 1998; Ferreira et al. 2005; Gongalves-de-Andrade et al. 2007). Here, we report the anomalous discovery of L. nifescens in a natural habitat in Thailand. Until now, L. nifescens has never been reported in a natural habitat outside of its native range in the Mediterranean region. Clearly, the description of the physical parameters of the cave in which the spiders were found, and an understanding of their basic biology, are important considerations for determining the colonization requirements of this species in the target area. Although speculative, the occurrence of L. nifescens in this part of Thailand might be explained by passive transportation by humans during World War II. The area in which we discovered L. nifescens was called the ‘Hellfire Pass’, when it was a major route for the construction of the infamous “Death Railway’’ or the Burma-Siam Railway along the Mae Klong River in Kanchanaburi province (Waterford 1994). The entrance of Tum-Wangpra cave is in close proximity to the railway (Fig. 1); material for the construction of the railway may have harbored the spiders, since specific railing material had to be shipped from Japan during that period, and there were already reports of L. nifescens present in Japan before 1940 (Bosenberg & Strand 1906; Strand 1918; Yaginuma 1940). In North and South America, studies on the biology, distribution, and medical aspects of Loxosceles are ongoing, particularly for the brown recluse spider L. reclusa Gertsch & Mulaik, 1940, which is endemic to the USA (Swanson and Vetter 2005). In contrast, research on the genetic diversity and venom potency of L. nifescens has only been extensively studied in recent years (Planas & Ribera 2015; Planas et al. 2015). A protein expression analysis of the sphingomyelinase D (SMase D) protein, which is considered to be the major component of Loxosceles venom that causes dermatological injuries (Binford et al., 2008), suggested that the SMase D protein activity in L. rufescens venom is as high as in other Loxosceles species (Planas et al. 2015). In 2014, it was reported that a man in Phrae province in the northern part of Thailand had been bitten by L. reclusa and died (Bangkokpost 2014). The symptoms reported were very similar to loxoscelism, and this news sparked much attention and in some cases hysteria from the general public, much of it unwarranted. However, a doctor later concluded that the man died as a result of a secondary bacterial infection due to an unidentified spider’s bite, and not loxoscelism as originally thought. This hypoth¬ esis agrees with our survey of the village perimeter near where the man was bitten, which did not yield any L. reclusa. Thus, in Thailand there is still no verified report of a human being bitten by a Loxosceles spider. Our next goal is to survey the distribution of L. nifescens beyond the Khao Wang Khmer area to identify the true range of the species. Molecular studies of the Thai L. nifescens are equally important for determining the spider’s origins. Indeed, since genetic diversity can be high within species of Loxosceles that share similar spermathecal and palp morphologies (Duncan et al. 2010; Planas & Ribera 2015; Planas et al. 2015), our samples need to be tested to determine whether they are genetically consistent with L. rufescens s. s. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the Plant Genetic Conservation Project under the Royal Initiative of Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn (RSPG), Chong Khao Khat, Sai Yok, Kanchanaburi province and the Royal Thai Army through Major Chanwit Prathomkamneard for the access to collect the spider specimens. The first sighting record of L. rufescens in Tum-Wangpra cave was initially reported to CS via Mr. Kirati Kunya. Dr. Deborah Smith from the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, USA, reviewed the manuscript and provided invaluable comments. We also greatly appreciate two anonymous reviewers for providing insights to the current state of Loxosceles studies and many important corrections. The assistance of Ms. Nungruthai Wichaikul is appreciated for helping us collect the spiders. Dr. Thongchai Ngampra- sertwong provided the authors with the temperature and humidity data at the collecting site. CHOMPHUPHUANG ET AL.— RECLUSE SPIDER IN THAILAND 147 LITERATURE CITED Bangkokpost. 2014. “1st Thai death from recluse spider”. Accessed 30 September 2014. Online at http://www.bangkokpost.com/ most-recent/422905/1 st-thai-death-from-recluse-spider Binford, G.J., M.S. Callahan, M.R. Bodner, M.R. Rynerson, P.B. Nunez, C.E. Ellison et al. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships of Loxosceles and Sicarius spiders are consistent with Western Gondwanan vicariance. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49:538-553. Bonnet, P. 1957. Bibliographia Araneorum. Toulouse 2:1927-3026. Bbsenberg, W. & E. Strand. 1906. Japanische Spinnen. Abhandlun- gen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 30:93- 422. Chen, X.E. & J.C. Gao. 1990. The Sichuan farmland spiders in China. Sichuan Science and Technology Publishing House, Chengdu. Chen, Z.F. & Z.H. Zhang. 1991. Fauna of Zhejiang: Araneida. Zhejiang Science and Technology Publishing House, Hangzhou. Duncan, R.P., M.R. Rynerson, C. Ribera & G.J. Binford. 2010. Diversity of Loxosceles spiders in northwestern Africa and molecular support for cryptic species in the Loxosceles rufescens lineage. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55:234-248. Dunin, P.M. 1992. The spider family Scytodidae of the USSR fauna. Trudy Zoologieskogo Instituta Akademija Nauk SSSR 226:74-82. Ferreira, R.L., X. Prous, S.F. Machado & R.P. Martins. 2005. Population dynamics of Loxosceles similis (Moenkhaus, 1898) in a Brazilian dry cave: a new method for evaluation of population size. Revista Brasileira de Zoociencias 7:129-141. Gertsch, W.J. & F. Ennik. 1983. The spider genus Loxosceles in North America, Central America, and the West Indies (Araneae, Loxoscelidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 175:264-360. Gongalves-de-Andrade, R.M., F.D. Pretel & D.V. Tambourgi. 2007. The spider Loxosceles adelakla Gertsch, 1967 (Araneae, Sicariidae) in the karstic area of Ribeira Valley, Petar, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Entomology 4:46-50. Greene. A., N.L. Breisch, T. Boardman Jr., B.B. Pagac, E. Kunickis, R.K. Howes et al. The Mediterranean recluse spider, Loxosceles rufescens (Dufour), an abundant but cryptic inhabitant of deep infrastructure in the Washington, DC area (Arachnida: Araneae: Sicariidae). American Entomologist 55:158-169. Griffin, R.E. 1998. Species richness and biogeography of non-acarine arachnids in Namibia. Biodiversity and Conservation 7:467-481. Harvey, M.S. 1996. The first record of the fiddle-back spider Loxosceles rufescens (Araneae: Sicariidae) from western Australia. Records of the Australian Museum 18:223-224. Lotz, L.N. 2012. Present status of Sicariidae (Arachnida: Araneae) in the Afrotropical region. Zootaxa 3522:1-41. Namkung, J. 2002. The Spiders of Korea. Kyo-Hak Publishing Co., Seoul. Newlands, G. 1975. A revision of the spider genus Loxosceles Heinecken & Lowe, 1835 (Araneae: Scytodidae) in southern Africa with notes on the natural history and morphology. Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa 38:141-154. Ono, H. 2009. The spiders of Japan with keys to the families and genera and illustrations of the species. Tokai University Press, Kanagawa. Planas, E. & C. Ribera. 2015. Description of six new species of Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae) endemic to the Canary Islands and the utility of DNA barcoding for their fast and accurate identification. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 174:47- 73. Planas, E., P.A. Zobel-Thropp, C. Ribera & G. Binford. 2015. Not as docile as it looks? Loxosceles venom variation and loxoscelism in the Mediterranean Basin and the Canary Islands. Toxicon 93:11- 19. Platnick, N.L 2015. The World Spider Catalog, version 14.0; American Museum of Natural History: New York. Online at http://www.wsc.nmbe.ch Shulov, A., M. Ickowicz & H. Pener-Salomon. 1962. Observations on the influence of the venom of Loxosceles rufescens (Sicariidae, Araneina) (Dufour 1820) on white mice. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Entomology 2:499-501. Song, D.X., M.S. Zhu & J. Chen. 1999. The Spiders of China. Hebei University of Science and Technology Publishing House, Shijia¬ zhuang. Strand, E. 1918. Zur Kenntnis japanischer Spinnen, I und 11. Archiv fiir Naturgeschichte 82:73-1 13. Swanson, D.L. & R.S. Vetter. 2005. Bites of brown recluse spiders and suspected necrotic arachnidism. New England Journal of Medicine 352:700-707. Swanson, D.L. & R.S. Vetter. 2006. Loxoscelism. Clinics in Dermatology 24:213-221. Tikader, B. K. 1963. On a new species of spider of the genus Loxosceles (Family Scytodidae) from India. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, Calcutta 16: 23-25. Vetter, R.S. 2008. Spiders of the genus Loxosceles (Araneae, Sicariidae): a review of biological, medical and psychological aspects regarding envenomations. Journal of Arachnology 36:150- 163. Waterford, V. 1994. Prisoners of the Japanese in World War 11. McFarland & Co. Inc., Jefferson, NC. Yaginuma, T. 1940. Some notes on Japanese spiders, 1. Acta Arachnologica, Tokyo, 5:123-132. Yaginuma, T. 1986. Spiders of Japan in Color. Hoikusha Publishing Co., Osaka. Yoshikura, M. 1987. The Biology of Spiders. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo. Zamani A. & J. Rafinejad. 2014. First record of the Mediterranean recluse spider Loxosceles rufescens (Araneae: Sicariidae) from Iran. Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases 8:228-231. Manuscript received 15 August 2015, revised 20 March 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:148-152 Chromosomal analyses of Salticinae and Lyssomaninae reveal a broad occurrence of the 2nd =28, XjXiO karyotype within Salticidae Douglas Araujo', Mariana Bessa Sanches', Juliane da Silva Gonsalves Santana Lima”, Erica Vanessa Juliao do Nascimento^, Andre Marsola Giroti"', Antonio Domingos BrescoviC, Doralice Maria Cella^ and Marielle Cristina Schneider^: 'Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, UFMS, Setor de Biologia Geral, Centro de Ciencias Biologicas e da Saude, Cidade Universitaria, Bairro Universitario, 79070-900, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. E-mail: d. araujo@ufms.br; ^Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, UEMS, Unidade Universitaria de Ivinhema, Centro, 79740-000, Ivinhema, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil; '^Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, UEMS, Unidade Universitaria de Mundo Novo, Universitario, 79790-000, Mundo Novo, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil; '^Instituto Butantan, Laboratorio Especial de Colegoes Zoologicas, Av. Vital Brasil, 1500, 05503-900, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil; meinoriam; ^Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, UNIFESP, Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Av. Prof. Artur Riedel, 275, 09972-270, Diadema, Sao Paulo, Brazil Abstract. Brazil possesses the richest fauna of Salticidae in the world, including 560 species; however, no representative of the Brazilian fauna has been cytogenetically analyzed up to now. It has been demonstrated that karyotype data are a useful source for discussions on the phylogeny and chromosome differentiation of some salticid lineages. In this work, the first chromosome study of salticid species from Brazil is presented, with the addition of five genera to the 38 previously investigated worldwide. The analysis of mitotic and/or meiotic cells revealed 2ncJ =28, X1X2O in Asaracus sp., Coryphasia sp., Chira sp., Frigga quintensis (Tullgren, 1905), and Lyssomanes pauper Mello-Leitao, 1945. This karyotype constitution is the most common for Salticidae, occurring in species of distinct clades. The diploid number 2n9 =28 observed in Hasariiis adansoni (Audouin, 1826) is unexpected, differing in one autosomal pair from the karyotype previously registered for males of the same species. The cytogenetic information reported here reinforces the wide occurence of 2n(? =28, X1X2O within Salticidae, including species belonging to different clades and biogeographical regions. This karyotype is a shared character of Salticidae + Philodromidae, found exclusively in these families within Dionycha, suggesting its sister relationship already proposed in the literature. Keywords: Jumping spider, meiosis, sex chromosome system, diploid number, chromosome evolution A hundred years has past since Painter (1914) cytogeneti¬ cally studied a salticid spider for the first time, Maevia mclemens (Walckenaer, 1837) [under Maevia vittata (Hentz, 1846)]. Despite the huge contribution of Maddison (1982, 1996) and Maddison & Leduc-Robert (2013), which cytoge¬ netically analyzed 86 salticids, only 155 species belonging to 38 genera were karyotyped up to now (Araujo et al. 2016). This number corresponds to only 2.65% of the 5,850 taxonomically described Salticidae species (World Spider Catalog 2016). Furthermore, many clades, mainly those predominantly composed of Neotropical species (Amycoida, Marpissoida, Euophryini and Freyina) or basal species (non-salticines) (Maddison 2015) remain almost unknown from the karyolog- ical point of view. Only six Neotropical Salticidae species, belonging to the genera Bryantella Chickering, 1946, Den- dryphantes C.L. Koch, 1837, Metaphidippus F.O.Pickard- Cambridge, 1901 (Salticinae, Dendryphantini, Dendryphaiiti- na) (Scioscia 1997) and Hahronattus F.O.Pickard-Cambridge, 1901 (Salticinae, Plexippini, Harmochirina) (Maddison & Leduc-Robert 2013) were cytogenetically studied, and, among these genera, only Bryantella is exclusively Neotropical (World Spider Catalog 2016). Within non-salticines, only Holcolaetis vellerea Simon, 1910 (under Holcolaetis vidua Lessert, 1927) (Spartaeinae, Spartaeini, Holcolaetina) was karyotyped (Mit¬ tal 1961, 1964). At a first glance, the salticids cytogenetically analyzed seem to constitute a relatively homogeneous group, mostly com¬ posed of species with 2n(5' =28, XiXiO (Araujo et al. 2016). A multiple sex chromosome system (SCS) of the X1X2O type is rare in other animal groups but the most common in spiders (see Araujo et al. 2012). In this SCS, the sex is not determinate by the presence of an Y or W chromosome, as it occurs in most mammals and birds. The number of copies of each X chromosome determines the sex, a single copy of each one (X1X2O) is characteristic of a male and two copies of each one (X1X1X2X2), characterizes a female. The “0” after the X1X2 denotes the absence of a Y chromosome in male complement. Thus, in this SCS, if the male diploid number is 2ii(? = 28 (26 autosomes plus X1X2), the female diploid number is 2n9 = 30 (26 autosomes plus X]XiX2X2). At the end of male meiosis I, both X) and X2 segregate to the same cell pole and the opposite pole contains no sex chromosomes. Recently, a study showed that uncommon karyotypes in spiders, with a multiple sex chromosome system including a Y chromosome (X1X2Y and X 1X2X3 Y), occur in Hahronattus, and probably evolved independently several times within this genus (Maddison & Leduc-Robert 2013). Cytogenetic studies on underrepresented salticid clades could provide us with information about the homogeneity or heterogeneity of some lineages and could be useful for discussions concerning salticid systematics. Thus, the goal of this study is to analyze the chromosomes of six Salticidae species from Brazil: the Salticinae Asaracus sp., Chira sp. and Frigga quintensis (Tullgren, 1905) (Aelurillini), Coryphasia sp. (Euophryini), and Hasarius adansoni (Audouin, 1826) (Hasar- 148 ARAUJO ET AL.— BROAD OCCURRENCE OF 2Nc? = 28, X,X20 IN SALTICIDS 149 Table 1. — Salticid spiders investigated in this work with their respective samples and collection localities in Brazil. SP = state of Sao Paulo, MS = state of Mato Grosso do Sul, PR = state of Parana. Classification according to Maddison (2015). Taxa Sample Collection locality Salticinae, Saltafresia, Aelurillini, Freyina Asaracus sp. Id Margem da Lagoa Xambre, Parque Nacional de llha Grande, 54°00'01"W), PR Altonia (23°52'2I"S, Chira sp. Id Rio Claro (22°24'00"S, 47°34'19"W), SP Frigga quintensis (Tullgren, 1905) 2d Margem da Lagoa Xambre, Parque Nacional de llha Grande, 54°00'01"W), PR; Ivinhema (22°18'00"S, 53°49'16"W), MS Altonia (23°52'21"S, Salticinae, Saltafresia, Euophryini Coryphasia sp. Id Rio Claro (22°24'00"S, 47°34'19"W), SP Salticinae, Saltafresia, Hasariini Hasarius adansoni (Audouin, 1826) 19 Ivinhema (22°18'00"S, 53°49'16"W), MS Lyssomaninae Lyssomanes pauper Mello-Leitao, 1945 4d,3$ Reserva Particular do Patrimonio Natural da UFMS (20°29'58 Campo Grande, MS ;"S, 54°36'48"W), iini), and the Lyssomaninae Lyssomanes pauper Mello-Leitao, 1945. Except for the genus Hasarius Simon, 1871, karyotyped by Suzuki (1951, 1954), the remaining genera were not previously cytogenetically analyzed (Araujo et al. 2016). METHODS The number of individuals and collection localities of the species examined in this work are listed in Table 1. Collecting permits were provided by the Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Renovaveis - IBAMA and Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservagao da Biodiversidade - ICMBio (15382-1 and 15157-1). The voucher specimens were deposited in the arachnological collection of the Laboratorio Especial de Colegoes Zoologicas, Instituto Butantan (IBSP, curator A. D. Brescovit), Sao Paulo, state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The chromosome preparations were obtained following Araujo et al. (2008), i.e., the gonads were submitted to 2 hours in a treatment with 0.16% colchicine solution (diluted on physio¬ logic solution: 7.5 g NaCl, 2.38 g Na2HP04, 2.72 g KH2PO4, in 1 1 of distilled water), 15 minutes in a hypotonic treatment with tap water, and fixation with methanol/acetic acid (3:1). Later, the gonads were dissociated in 45% acid acetic solution on the surface of a microscope slide that was heated to 35 °C/ 40 °C, and standard stained with 3% Giemsa solution (3% of commercial Giemsa and 3% of phosphate buffer pH 6.8 in distilled water) for 12 min. At least 30 cells were considered in the analysis of each species. The chromosome morphology was determined following the nomenclature proposed by Levan et al. (1964). Difficulties in obtaining certain stages of cell division occurred due to the low number of specimens, for most species, or the development stage of the individuals, as in the case of L. pauper. RESULTS Male diplotene/metaphase I cells of Asaracus sp., Corypha- sia sp., dura sp. and F. quintensis are composed of 13 autosomal bivalents and two sex univalents (X] and X2). Thus, the meiotic formula of these species is I3II-I-X1X2O. The number of chiasmata per bivalent is usually one, localized on terminal, interstitial or proximal regions, but some bivalents with two terminal chiasmata can be observed in some cells. The sex chromosomes can be easily identified due to their positive heteropycnosis and/or peculiar disposition, since they normally appear side by side or at least close to each other (Fig. lA-D). The positive heteropycnosis of the sex chromo¬ somes is detected even at pachytene, in which it is possible to observe the X] and X2 closely packed, being difficult to establish their limits (Fig. IE), or clearly separated from each other (Fig. IF). Male metaphase II cells of Asaracus sp. and F. quintensis exhibited n = 13 or n = 15, confirming the regular segregation of the Xj and X2 chromosomes to the same pole at anaphase I (Fig. IG, H). In some metaphase II nuclei, the sex chromosomes cannot be distinguished from the autosomes (Fig. IG), but in others, these elements presented a positive heteropycnosis (Fig. IH). Spermatogonial prometaphase/metaphase cells of Corypha- sia sp., F. quintensis and L. pauper showed 2n 0.1). The adult male proportion greatly exceeded those of both penultimate (7 of 336: 2.1%; Gi = 64.35, P < 0.0001)) and adult females (14 of 862: 1.6%; G| = 97.13, P < 0.0001). The frequency of forelimb loss in the penultimate males also exceeded that of both penultimate and adult females (G, = 8.27, P < 0.01; adults: G, = 11.72, P < 0.001). Numbers of missing forelimbs of unsexed earlier instars closely resembled those of females (4 of 227: 1.8%), significantly less than both adult (Gj = 88.89, P < 0.0001) and penultimate {G\ = 9.60, P < 0.01) males. Body size (carapace width) did not differ significantly with the loss of one or more forelimbs, with the four forelimb-loss classes (0 - 3) exhibiting similar carapace widths at all of the sites (Table 1). As predicted, individuals missing progressively more forelimbs weighed less than those with fewer missing forelimbs (Table 1). However, after correcting masses for forelimbs lost, those with missing forelimbs were still significantly lighter than intact ones (Table 1). Although differences in mass between intact individuals and those with a single missing limb (corrected for estimated mass of that missing forelimb) were modest, suggesting a relatively minor effect, those between one and two missing limbs showed a several-fold decrease in mass, which was further extended in those missing three limbs (Table 1). Carapace width and mass (corrected) were nevertheless highly correlated (linear regres¬ sion: R~ — 0.643, F] 599 = 1083, P < 0.0001), accounting for roughly two-thirds of the total variance. Among other variables measured, proportions of individu¬ als missing forelimbs increased as the season progressed (date captured) (Table 1), although the majority of forelimb loss had already occurred by the first measure, early in the season. collection differed significantly in relation to forelimb loss (Table 1), allowing me to pool these data sets. Use of date of capture, date of death, year and collection site as covariates resulted in only one change in the relationship between size and forelimb loss: site had a moderately significant effect (i^3,298 = 2.81, P= 0.040). Short forelimbs. — Individuals with short forelimbs arise from ones that lost these forelimbs earlier in ontogeny. I encountered individuals with short forelimbs far less frequent¬ ly than ones missing forelimbs (24 vs. 1 10; 3.8% vs. 18.1%; G] = 127.08, P < 0.0001, goodness of fit, n = 633). Carapace width did not differ significantly with the presence of short forelimbs (Table 2). Neither mass (Table 2) nor mass corrected for the short limbs (Table 2) differed significantly, the result of a single anomalously large individual regenerating two forelimbs. Of the other variables measured (date of death carapace width, year, site of collection), none was significant (Table 2). I obtained one penultimate male with a short forelimb (1 of 52 = 1.9%, not differing significantly in frequency from adult males (G] = 0.50, P > 0.3). I have also reared additional penultimate males in the laboratory that lacked a forelimb and subsequently molted into the adult stage with half-length forelimbs similar to those seen on the 24 adult males reported here. I only obtained occasional penultimate and adult females with short forelimbs in much larger samples (penultimate: 1 of 336 = 0.8%; adult: 2 of 862 = 0.2%). These frequencies fall significantly below those of the adult males (Gi = 13.85, P < 0.001; G\ = 28.84, P < 0.001, respectively). I found no early instars with missing forelimbs (0 of 227). Survival in field and laboratory. — Many confined male Misumena lived for periods considerably longer than the Table 2. — Characteristics of adult male Misumena vatia with 0-2 short forelimbs (mean ± SD), and results of ANOVAs. Superscripts 1^ as in Table 1; ^ After removal of an anomalously large individual of 8.9 mg, mass = 2.93 ± 0.847 mg and mass corrected = 4.08 ± 0.777 mg. Variable F df P Number of short forelimbs («) 0 (491) 1 (17) 2(7) Carapace (mm) 1.47±0.149 1.45±0.140 1.46±0.178 0.23 1,513 0.63 Mass (mg) 4.58±1.540 4.06±1.134 4.21 ±2.222 ’ 1.71 1,513 0.19 Mass corrected* 4.58±1.540 4.32± 1.208 4.77±2.516 ’ 0.03 1,513 0.87 Date of capture^ 172.1±10.66 175.1±12.98 170.9±9.10 0.2 1,513 0.65 Date of death^ 203.4±18.11 204.1 ±18.54 215.1 ±28.27 0.63 1,262 0.43 Year’ 4.5±4.20 4.9±4.40 2.3±3.90 0.73 1,513 0.39 Collection site'* 2.7±1.57 3.4±1.52 2.4±1.81 0.27 1,513 0.60 168 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY maximum dates I have recorded in the field. During one year that I weekly censused Misumena in all flowers at eight sites in the vicinity of the Darling Center (total = 0.72 ha), I failed to record adult males after 28 July, a pattern consistent with less systematic observations made over the 2000-2012 period, in which I have rarely found adult males in the field after that date. However, I have frequently maintained males in the laboratory until late August and early September, and 74.6% of the males retained in this study (n = 303) survived past 28 July. I did not find significant differences in longevity in the laboratory between intact individuals and those that had lost forelimbs (ANOVA: F,,3oo = 0.11, P = 0.742). DISCUSSION Possible sources of forelimb loss. — Male Misumena lose forelimbs at a highly significantly greater rate than either penultimate or adult females. Forelimb loss of penultimate males is more comparable to that of the adult males than of females or juveniles and provides insight into the frequency of loss among the adult males. Unfortunately, the sample of penultimate males is relatively small, since virtually all of the males since 2002 have molted into the adult stage before our field season begins in early June, part of a pervasive shift in the phenology of several species monitored since 1995 in the main study area (D.H. Morse, unpubl. data). Adult males engage in aggressive interactions when near each other, but penultimate males, which have a comparable rate of forelimb loss, generally do not undertake high-level interactions (Holdsworth & Morse 2000). A relatively low rate of forelimb loss of adult males even in staged encounters between males at the sites of late-stage penultimate females (3 in 90 encounters, 3.3%: Hu & Morse 2004) and in mating experiments (Morse 2010) makes the putative role of adult male aggression unlikely as a sole or principal source of forelimb loss. Opportunities for these interactions are rela¬ tively infrequent in the field, much lower than in the closely related Misumenoides formosipes (Walckenaer, 1837) (Dodson & Beck 1993; Dodson et al. 2015). The similar size (carapace width) of individuals with different numbers of missing forelimbs is also inconsistent with aggressive interactions playing the major role in limb loss. Otherwise, one might expect large dominant males to produce higher limb losses in combat than smaller ones, because large individuals initiate attacks more frequently than smaller ones, a pattern seen in other species as well (Jakob 1994; Hu & Morse 2004). Hence, the high frequency of missing limbs in adult males is unlikely to result solely from male aggression. Mating is a dangerous experience for male spiders, with some species even dying after mating, including instances in which they are killed by their mates (Andrade 1996; Foellmer & Fairbairn 2003; Schneider et al. 2006). Mating takes a less frequent toll in Misumena, but aggressive females do regularly capture courting males. However, I have found that in virtually all instances the females strike directly at the body, and the male either escapes intact or is captured and killed (Morse & Hu 2004; Morse 2010). Predators vary in their tendency to strike at a spider’s body or limbs (Formanowicz 1990). Thus, male-female interactions also appear unlikely to account for a major part of the observed limb loss. Male forelimbs are especially long and slender and thus potentially vulnerable to loss. Although not as long as those of adults (Morse 2007), penultimate forelimbs are nevertheless extremely long and slender relative to those of females (Morse 2007) and are thus potentially vulnerable to predators or to entanglement in the vegetation (Maginnis 2006b). On the basis of occasional observations made while collecting males in the field, I predicted that the long, gracile form of male forelimbs would enhance their vulnerability to entanglement in the vegetation (petiole-stem interstices, etc.), especially if suddenly attacked. Analogously, web-building spiders may autotomize limbs if tangled in webs (Johnson & Jakob 1999). Although spiders may experience difficulty in extracting their limbs from their old molt (Maginnis 2006a; Foelix 201 1), male Misumena molt successfully in the laboratory, as long as I maintain adequate humidity. Problems of low humidity are probably even less likely to occur in the field. Thus, this potential problem appears unlikely to account for a major part of forelimb loss of the males. The frequency of missing forelimbs in the penultimate males appears adequate to suggest that many of the adults missing forelimbs suffered the loss earlier in ontogeny. Pasquet et al. (2011) and others have reported losses of less than 1% in penultimate males of other species. Short forelimbs. — Adult males with short forelimbs experi¬ enced an even greater disadvantage under natural conditions than those completely lacking limbs, in that they performed a number of movements more slowly than even those missing limbs, and most of them also lost condition (Lutzy & Morse 2008) . Some spiders held partially regrown limbs away from the body, which therefore did not contribute to locomotion (Vollrath 1990) or prey capture (Wrinn & Uetz 2008). The spiders also expend considerable energy growing these new limbs (Maginnis 2006a; Bely & Nyberg 2009). Thus, it appears that these males would profit from losing their regenerative ability, especially in the later instars. Indeed, one could imagine such selective pressures having driven the loss of regeneration in groups that have lost this ability. Losses of the ability to regenerate limbs have occurred many times among groups that exhibit autotomy and appear related to conditions routinely experienced in the field (Bely & Nyberg 2009). Since regeneration only produces external limbs at molts, none of the small replacement forelimbs result from losses in the adult stage. Most likely the adult males with partially regenerating forelimbs lost their forelimbs early in their penultimate stage. In some species of spiders, regeneration will occur if limb loss takes place during the first quarter of an individual’s penultimate instar (Foelix 2011, citing Bonnet 1930). This prediction is consistent with the statistically similar level of forelimb loss seen in adult and penultimate males. Male survival. — The difference between apparent adult male survival in the field and laboratory suggests that they seldom reach their maximum potential life span in the field. In the field, males spend most of their adult lives vigorously searching for females (LeGrand & Morse 2000). Although adult males do feed (vs. males of many spiders: Foelix 2011) and largely retain their weight over time, their high level of activity (Holdsworth & Morse 2000) presumably takes its toll. Male spiders regularly die before their females (e.g., Dodson & Schwaab 2001). The similar survival in the laboratory between MORSE— LIMB LOSS AND REGENERATION OF MISUMENA intact individuals and those lacking forelimbs was initially surprising, because individuals lacking forelimbs were signif¬ icantly lighter (after correction for missing forelimbs) and in poorer condition than intact individuals when captured. This result is probably a consequence of the easily captured food in the laboratory, which permitted feeding to satiation. Thus, the poor condition of individuals lacking one or more forelimbs in the field may result from decreased success in prey capture under complex conditions (Brueseke et al. 2001), as well as compromised locomotor capabilities (Lutzy & Morse 2008). The laboratory-retained individuals lacking one or more forelimbs would presumably have performed poorly in a set of locomotor tasks comparable to those they would experience in the field. In fact, field-captured individuals could not travel on lines as rapidly as intact ones (Lutzy & Morse 2008). If they followed the pattern observed in intact individuals (Lutzy & Morse 2008; Morse 2014), they probably would score poorly in other locomotor activities (running, climbing) as well as in line-crossing. Thus, forelimb loss results in compromised body condition and performance. Regeneration and forelimb loss. — Bely & Nyberg (2009) identify the question of why regeneration persists where it appears to be irrelevant as a major unaddressed question in regeneration studies. Although regeneration of forelimbs appears disadvantageous to penultimate and adult male Misumena, it may be advantageous in early instars. However, the earlier Misumena instars exhibit significantly lower frequencies of forelimb loss than the penultimate and adult males, which would suggest that selection could not operate as strongly as on the older males. Regeneration might also be advantageous for the females; however, they have strikingly lower frequencies of lost or short forelimbs than the males, making the explanation problematic. Thus, the results leave a major unanswered question: why are male and female forelimb losses so different? Results presented here and in the literature suggest that this difference involves a conflict between robustness and speed: the difference between the ability of females to manipulate large prey and the ability of males to move quickly when searching for females. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A long series of Brown University undergraduate students assisted in the collection and maintenance of these spiders. They are individually acknowledged in the papers cited here. The US National Science Foundation supported the work on Misumena over the 2000-2005 period. I thank the Darling Center of the University of Maine for use of the study site and K.J. Eckelbarger, T.E. Miller, L. Healy, and other staff members for facilitating fieldwork on the premises. LITERATURE CITED Andrade, M.C.B. 1996. Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the Australian redback spider. Science 271:70-72. Bely, A.E. & K.G. Nyberg. 2009. Evolution of animal regeneration: re-emergence of a field. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25:161- 170. Brueseke, M., A. Rypstra, S. Walker & M. Persons. 2001. Leg 169 autotomy in the wolf spider Pardosa miivina (Araneae: Lycosidae). American Midland Naturalist 146:153-160. Dodson, G.N. & M.W. Beck. 1993. Pre-copulatory guarding of penultimate females by male crab spiders, Misiiiuenoides formo- sipes. Animal Behaviour 46:951-959. Dodson, G.N. &. A.T. Schwaab. 2001. Body size, leg autotomy, and prior experience as factors in the fighting success of male crab spiders Miswnenoides fomwsipes. Journal of Insect Behavior 14:841-855. Dodson, G.N., A.G. Anderson & L.M. Stellwag. 2015. Movement, sex ratio, and population density in a dwarf male spider species, Miswnenoides fonnosipes (Araneae: Thomisidae). Journal of Arachnology 43:388-393. Fleming, P.A., D. Muller & P.W. Bateman. 2007. Leave it all behind: a taxonomic perspective of autotomy in invertebrates. Biological Reviews 82:481-510. Foelix, R.F. 2011. Biology of Spiders, third edition. Oxford University Press, New York. Foellmer, M.W. & D.J. Fairbairn. 2003. Spontaneous male death during copulation in an orb-weaving spider. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Supplement 2, 270:183-185. Formanowicz, D.R. 1990. The antipredator efficacy of spider leg autotomy. Animal Behaviour 40:400-401. Guffy, C. 1998. Leg autotomy and its potential fitness costs for two species of harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones). Journal of Arach¬ nology 26:296-302. Holdsworth, A.R. & D.H. Morse. 2000. Mate guarding and aggression by the crab spider Misumena vcitia in relation to female reproductive status and sex ratio. American Midland Naturalist 143:201-211. Hu, H.H. & D.H. Morse. 2004. The effect of age on encounters between male crab spiders. Behavioral Ecology 15:883-888. Jakob, E.M. 1994. Contests over prey by group-living pholcids (Holocnemiis plucliei). Journal of Arachnology 22:39-45. Johnson, S.A. & E.M. Jakob. 1999. Leg autotomy in a spider has minimal costs in competitive ability and development. Animal Behaviour 57:957-965. LeGrand, R.S. & D.H. Morse. 2000. Factors driving extreme sexual dimorphism of a sit-and-wait predator under low density. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 71:643-664. Lutzy, R.M. & D.H. Morse. 2008. Effects of leg loss on male crab spiders Misumena vatia. Animal Behaviour 76:1519-1527. Maginnis, T.L. 2006a. The costs of autotomy and regeneration in animals: a review and framework for future research. Behavioral Ecology 17:857-872. Maginnis, T.L. 2006b. Leg regeneration stunts wing growth and hinders flight performance in a stick insect {Sipyloidea sipylus). Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273:1811-1814. Morse, D.H. 2007. Predator Upon a Flower. Life History and Fitness in a Crab Spider. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massa¬ chusetts. Morse, D.H. 2010. Male mate choice and female response in relation to mating status and time since mating. Behavioral Ecology 21:250-256. Morse, D.H. 2014. The relation of size to climbing, line-crossing and running performances of male crab spiders. Evolutionary Ecology 28:23-36. Morse, D.H. & H.H. Hu. 2004. Age-dependent cannibalism of male crab spiders. American Midland Naturalist 151:318-325. Pasquet, A., M. Anotaux & R. Leborgne. 2011. Loss of legs: is it or not a handicap for an orb-weaving spider? Naturwissenschaften 98:557-564. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Randall, J.B. 1981. Regeneration and autotomy exhibited by the 170 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY black widow spider, Latrodectus vciriolus Walckenaer I. The legs. Wilhelm Roux's Archiives of Developmental Biology 190:230-232. Schneider, J.M., S. Gilberg, L. Fromhage & G. Uhl. 2006. Sexual conflict over copulation duration in a cannibalistic spider. Animal Behaviour 71:781-788. Steffenson, M.M., D.R. Formanowicz & C.A. Brown. 2014. Autotomy and its effects on wolf spider foraging success. Ethology 120:1128-1136. Vollrath, F. 1990. Leg regeneration in web spiders and its implications for orb weaver phytogeny. Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 8:177-184. Wilkie, l.C. 2001. Autotomy as a prelude to regeneration in echinoderms. Microscopy Research and Techniques 55:369-396. Wrinn, K.M. & G.W. Uetz. 2008. Effects of autotomy and regeneration on detection and capture of prey in a generalist predator. Behavioral Ecology 19:1282-1288. Manuscript received 8 December 2015, revised 25 February 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:171-175 Female feeding history impacts gonad development and reproductive timing in the wolf spider Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz, 1844) Brian Moskalik*'“ and George W. Uetz': 'University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221; "^Department of Natural Sciences, University of St. Francis, Joliet, IL 60435; E-mail: BMoskalik@stfrancis.edu Abstract. In mating systems that include semelparous reproduction and/or scramble competition, synchronous maturation of the sexes is vital for success. However, food limitation may alter the onset of maturation or the overall quality of the mature individuals and affect reproductive success. We examined the role of feeding history (well-fed vs. long-term deprivation) on female reproductive timing and its correlation with temporal patterns of receptivity behavior in the wolf spider Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz, 1844). We found that feeding history influenced developmental time and delayed maturation in long-term food-limited females. There was no significant difference in relative condition between treatments, yet well-fed females showed higher rates of receptivity. Peak receptivity behavior was correlated with the estimated overall mass of female ovaries/eggs, with females that possess larger ovaries and eggs showing more receptive behavior. This supports the hypothesis that while a food-limited female may attain maturity, the limiting factor underlying reproductive success is gonad maturation. Keywords: Fecundity, diet, receptivity, egg development Understanding the interactions between nutrition and the development of reproductive anatomy is important when addressing mate choice, sexual selection, and sexual conflict (Arnqvist & Rowe 2005; Uetz & Norton 2007). For semelparous organisms with well-defined seasonal reproduc¬ tion, many factors may impact the onset and maintenance of receptivity and courtship within a species (Lehrman 1965; Barth & Lester 1973). This ontogeny may be linked to the natural seasonality of the environment and impose intrinsic control over the ability to acquire food and allocate sufficient energy to reproductive efforts. Throughout the animal kingdom, sexually reproducing species are constrained by the maturation of reproductive structures and the initiation of sex specific behaviors, as these behavioi's are often associated with hormones released by the developing gonads (Lehrman 1965; Barth & Lester 1973; Ringo 1996). Maintenance of physiological condition and gametes is also important to reproductive success, and conflict exists between mating age, egg maturity and egg maintenance (Moore et al. 2007). Research has demonstrated links between female reproductive state, egg maturity, female receptivity and aggression in both solitary and subsocial spiders and some insects (Trabalon et al. 1988,1992; Wilgers & Hebets 2012). In spiders, females have been shown to produce different levels of hormones in relation to egg maturation, which contribute to female tolerance of conspecifics (Trabalon et al. 1988,1992). Even so, no research on spiders has yet examined the condition-dependent nature of female ovary development and its relationship to behavior, or the temporal consequences of diet on reproductive physiology. There is, however, evidence for compensatory development in spiders, based on recovery of body size and mass after nutritional stress (Jespersen & Toft 2003). Additional support suggests that during times of stress (i.e., food deprivation) there should be compromise in physiological processes (Gustafsson et al. 1994; McNamara & Houston 1996). It is well-established that diet has direct consequences for reproductive investment of females (Enders 1976; Simpson 1995; Parker & Begon 1996; Toft & Wise 1999; Kreiter & Wise 2001). Thus, while much speculation exists about egg development/investment in spiders (Foelix 1996), little else is known about the direct effects of diet on gonad development. By examining the interactions between diet and gonad development, we will better be able to see how physiological limitations imposed by long-term diet restrictions impact mate choice decisions of females. For many spider taxa, there are age-related differences in mate choice and female receptivity, frequently accompanied by differential male courtship investment (Norton & Uetz 2005; Uetz & Norton 2007; Wilgers & Hebets 2012; Rundus et al. 2015). In the wolf spider Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz, 1844), females have a predictable receptivity cycle after maturity, in which they are initially highly resistant to male advances (Week 1) followed by a level of high receptivity (Week 3) and a return to resistance (Week 5 and later); high levels of resistance are also demonstrated after mating (Norton & Uetz 2005; Uetz & Norton 2007). Uetz & Norton (2007) suggested this pattern might be related to potential availability of males, as phenology of maturation in this species is typically asynchronous (i.e., males tend to mature before females, leading to a male-biased sex ratio early in the breeding season). However, long-term observations (Uetz & Roberts, unpubl.) have shown that maturation synchrony does vary from year-to-year with weather factors. Additional research has demonstrated that this cycle is also condition dependent (Moskalik & Uetz 2011), suggesting the possibility that concomitant factors such as gonad development might be driving receptivity. The analysis of egg maturity during phases of this behavioral cycle may therefore shed light on what may be driving female receptive and aggressive behavior. Here, we tested two hypotheses: (1) diet will affect development of and total investment in reproductive struc¬ tures of female spiders for both penultimate (follicle number, size) and adult S. ocreata (fecundity, egg size, volume, total clutch volume) and (2) female ovary and egg maturation in well-fed spiders will coincide with the previously described 171 172 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 1. Image of ovulated follicles (oocytes) from a well-fed ultimate female 21 days mature. F shows an individual follicle, the arrow indicates pedicle/funiculus, and O indicates a fragment of the ovary. receptivity curve (Uetz & Norton 2007) and influence behavior in a predictable manner. We predicted that if diet impacts reproductive structure development, then the food-limited group should demonstrate smaller average gonad size and reduced numbers of ovulated follicles and/or mature ova compared to the well-fed group. Also, if female ovary development impacts receptivity, a relationship between egg maturation (size) and previously observed temporal patterns of receptivity will be seen, with female peak receptivity coinciding with the time that eggs become larger because of the accumulation of yolk. METHODS Spider maintenance. — Hatchling spiders were obtained from field collected females with egg sacs and maintained in deli- style containers (9 cm height x 5 cm width). Spiders were held in the laboratory on a 14:10 lightidark cycle at 23°C and randomly assigned to well-fed or food-limited dietary proto¬ cols (Uetz et al. 2002; Balfour et al. 2003). Both treatments received gut-loaded crickets (Aclieta domesticus) with well-fed individuals receiving 100% of their mass twice per week and food-limited individuals receiving 50% of their body mass once per week. Diet implementation and growth were followed from hatching to adulthood. Individuals were then randomly assigned to assay groups (penultimate; week 1 post ultimate molt, hereafter mature week 1; week 3 post ultimate molt, hereafter mature week 3). Assessment of female growth. — We assessed all females and compared mass, cephalothorax width (CW) and developmen- Figure 2. — Biramous ovary with follicular development from well- fed penultimate female. F indicates follicle clusters and U the oviduct/ uterine tube. tal time (total days to maturity and number of instars) between starvation and well-fed treatment groups with a one¬ way ANOVA. To assess female body condition between diet treatments, we used an ANCOVA of weight x treatment, and adult cephalothorax width (CW) as the covariate (Marshall et al. 2000; Garcia-Berthou 2001; Schulte-Hostedde et al. 2005). Assessment of female receptivity. — We assessed female receptivity with behavioral assays at three designated times (penultimate, mature week 1, mature week 3) matching those of earlier studies of female behavior (Uetz & Norton 2007). Females were placed with well-fed, lab-reared males in an arena for 5 minutes and observed for receptive behavior and male mounting behavior. The 5-minute duration has been shown to be an effective time frame to determine female choice (Moskalik & Uetz 2011). Males were mature for three to five weeks and in apparently good condition. To control for male variation, if no mating occurred, the first male was removed and a second male was placed in the arena and allowed to court for another 5 minutes. If mounting occurred, the pair were immediately separated and the female was euthanized under CO2, preserved in AAF fixative (10 ml concentrated formalin: 5 ml glacial acetic acid: 75 ml 96% ethyl alcohol: 10 ml distilled water) and dissected to examine egg development. To examine the effect of diet treatment on spider development, we compared well-fed and food-limited treat¬ ment females (« = 75 and 46, respectively) using one-way ANOVA. The effect of treatment on behavior was assessed by using a Chi square comparison of proportion of receptive MOSKALIK & UETZ— FEMALE FEEDING HISTORY AND GONAD DEVELOPMENT 173 Table 1. — Female development. One-way ANOVA analyses of female development. Bold P value indicate significant differences between diet treatments Source df F ratio P Mature weight 1 8.534 0.004 Mature cephalothorax 1 7.871 0.006 Mean instar length 1 0.024 0.877 No. of molts 1 8.762 0.004 Total development duration 1 6.513 0.012 adult females at two points in time after maturity (Week 1 and Week 3). Images of eggs and oocytes were taken with an Olympus digital camera (Figs. 1, 2). Measurements of egg development included total egg number and mean egg diameter. Mean diameter was generated by measuring the width of 10 eggs at random or 10% of the clutch, whichever was greater. Using the standard equation for the volume of a sphere, we estimated the volume of the eggs using the mean diameter. A measurement representing total investment (total clutch volume) was derived by multiplying the mean volume by the total number of eggs. Egg number and total estimated clutch volume were analyzed with a two-way ANOVA, with treatment (starved vs. well-fed) and female age (penultimate, mature week 1 , mature week 3) as factors. RESULTS Spider development. — Stadia did not differ significantly between treatments, but number of instars, total duration of development, cephalothorax width, and adult mass varied significantly with diet (Table 1). Tukey post hoc examinations revealed that mean stadia did not differ significantly between treatments (Well-Fed; 27 ± 4.5 vs. Starved: 27 ± 4.8 days; Fi,9i =0.024, F = 0.89) but there was a significant effect of diet on number of instars, with well-fed females requiring fewer molts to attain maturity (Well-Fed: 6.68 ± 0.14 vs. Starved: 7.32 ± 0.17 molts respectively; Fi gj =8.76, P = 0.004). Total developmental time varied significantly with well-fed females maturing fastest (Well-Fed: 179 ± 4.9 vs. Starved: 196 ± 4.5 days: Fj 91 =6.51, /’ = 0.012). Well-fed females were also larger and heavier than the long-term starvation groups (Table 1). Results of female body condition indicate that relative condition (i.e., mass scaled to body size) did not vary by treatment when cephalothorax was accounted for (F149 = 0.94, F = 0.35). Behavior. — In week 1, females within each treatment were equally likely to be receptive to males {n — 20, X~ — 0.02, P = Figure 3. — Graph showing the decline and divergence of mean egg number ± standard error between diet treatments. The gray solid line represents the well-fed group and the dashed line represents food- limited group. * Indicates a significant difference. 0.89; <20% of females). However during week 3, treatment significantly impacted the proportions of females receptive to males {n = 20, X~ — 6.54, P = 0.011) with 60% of well-fed females showing receptivity, versus 20% of limited females becoming receptive. Comparisons of egg development. — Egg number (Table 2) per female was normally distributed and was analyzed with a multifactor ANOVA, revealing whole model significance, a significant difference between weeks, and a significant interaction between diet and week (Table 3). Post hoc analyses revealed that egg numbers declined uniformly between treatments but by week 3, low diet treatments were significantly lower than well-fed (Table 2, Fig. 3). Egg diameter was not normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilks W = 0.92, P = 0.012) and was examined for outliers. Grubbs outlier test (JMP 8) confirmed two outliers that were removed and the subsequent distribution was then normal (Shapiro-Wilks W = 0.95, P = 0.19). The same multifactor ANOVA was applied and indicated whole model significance and demonstrated that week and diet both impacted egg diameter but there was no interaction (Table 4). As expected, well-fed females had larger eggs than food limited females (Tables 2, 4) and egg diameter significantly increased with time (Tables 2, 4). Penultimate females had the smallest diameter with eggs growing successively larger each week (0.13 ± 0.006 mm vs. 0.!4 ± 0.003 mm vs. 0.16 ± 0.003 mm: penultimate, weeks 1 and 3 respectively). The total clutch investment showed significant right skew (Shapiro-Wilks W = 0.80, P < 0.0001) and was Box Cox Y transformed for best fit (Shapiro-Wilks W = 96, P = 0.19; JMP 8). The multifactor ANOVA showed whole model significance and that diet and a diet x week interaction Table 2. — Egg developmental characteristics based on treatment. Treatment Age No. of egg follicles Follicle diameter (mean, mm) Follicle diameter (range, mm) Estimated clutch volume (mnu^, investment) Well-fed Penultimate 127 0.133 0.125-0.148 0.165 Week 1 86 0.152 0.137-0.179 0.168 Week 3 81 0.189 0.157-0.233 0.305 Food-limited Penultimate 123 0.130 0.122A).138 0.114 Week 1 91 0.121 0.115-0.127 0.105 Week 3 51 0.151 0.145-0.157 0.091 174 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 3. — Two-way ANOVA analyses of mean number of eggs. Bold P values indicate significant differences. Source df F ratio P Whole model 5 11.79 <0.0001 Treatment 1 2.1011 0.16 Week 2 24.6155 <0.0001 Treatment*Week 2 3.9543 0.03 significantly impacted total investment (Table 5). Tukey post hoc analyses revealed that initial clutch volume was equal in both groups and there was a divergence for both groups in week 1; in week 3, the divergence increased (Fig. 3). DISCUSSION Our results support previous findings that females who were fed more grew faster and produced more eggs. As a consequence, development and maintenance of follicles and eggs was compromised in starvation treatments. The impacts, however, were not significant until later in maturity (week 3). This suggests that female feeding history can impact egg maintenance, which could potentially affect receptivity behav¬ ior and subsequent mating or mate choice decisions. As predicted, follicular development mirrored the behavioral tendencies first observed by Uetz & Norton (2007). We observed that a reduced female feeding history significantly reduced the likelihood of female receptivity over time. From these results, we can infer a correlation between female age, diet, ovary/follicle development and receptivity. The initial results suggest that females invest equal amounts of resources into follicles regardless of treatment during their penultimate stage until the onset of adulthood. Then as maturity and adulthood ensue, females diverge in their ability to 1) maintain overall egg numbers and 2) invest in egg nutrition that would subsequently support the post-embryonic spiderling. This research also highlights the impact that diet has on spider developmental plasticity, as S. ocreata demonstrated marked plasticity in developmental time. Well-fed females were able to mature in fewer instars and still attain a population mean adult size. On the other hand, food-limited females were delayed in maturation by the addition of one or two more instars, thus passing through 9-10 post emergent instars, which has been previously reported for this species (Amaya & Klawinski 1996). These late maturing females were significantly smaller than the rest of the laboratory popula¬ tion. However, an ANCOVA based on mass scaled to body size revealed no differences. This finding raises questions regarding the sensitivity of ANCOVA vs. a ratio or residual body condition index (BCI) when examining development and Table 4. — Two-way ANOVA analyses of mean egg diameter. Bold P values indicate significant differences. Source df F ratio P Whole model 5 12.61 <0.0001 Treatment 1 11.26 0.002 Week 2 14.97 <0.000! Treatment* Week 2 1.30 0.29 Table 5. — Two-way ANOVA analyses of mean total clutch volume. Bold P values indicate significant differences Source df F Ratio P Whole model 5 9.16 <0.0001 Treatment 1 14.99 0.0006 Week 2 1.08 0.35 Treatment* Week 2 4.09 0.03 plasticity within a population subjected to varying food abundance. Previous research on spider ovary development has described the developmental stages eggs go through as they mature and how these correlate with female ecdysteroid levels in the spiders Coelotes terrestris (Wider, 1834) and Tegenaria domestica (Clerck, 1757) (Trabalon et al. 1988, 1992). There were several distinct differences between these results and our wolf spider population. Seemingly, the development of follicles in these agelenid spiders occurs after maturation, whereas in our lycosid species it begins during the penultimate stage. Additionally, the growth of the agelenid spiders was very robust, with each individual requiring a fixed number of instars to reach adulthood. Our lycosid spiders, even in the absence of diet variation, showed some plasticity in matura¬ tion time and could mature earlier than the expected population maxima (8*'’ instar post emergence). Research presented here demonstrates the importance of female diet and how it affects growth, behavior, reproduction and fecundity of female S. ocreata wolf spiders. While growth shows plasticity, certain other developmental aspects do not. Female follicular ovulation seems to be fixed with respect to the number of initial oocytes generated. There are clearly more oocytes ovulated than can be supported by these females, as even the well-fed group had an intrinsic “rate of decay” within the first week of maturity. The loss of eggs may be a timing event that eventually signals the maximum clutch amount for the female, thus representing an “internal clock”. This observation generates many interesting avenues of inquiry that deserve future attention. Female behavior appears to be regulated by feeding; perhaps food limited females have a 1.0t Deprived Well-fed Figure 4. — Estimated total volume of clutch in mm'^ (bars indicate standard error). Letters indicate significant differences within and between treatments [R = penultimate instar; 1, 3 indicate weeks post¬ maturity) based on Tukey post hoc test. MOSKALIK & UETZ— FEMALE FEEDING HISTORY AND GONAD DEVELOPMENT 175 continuous rate of egg loss and ideally benefit from cannibalism, not mating, in order to support fecundity. However once egg loss slows or stops, mating should ensue, regardless of feeding, as maximal fecundity has been reached for that individual. Future studies should address potential trade-offs and physiological relationships between fecundity, survival and maturation timing. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for completion of the Ph.D. degree in Biological Sciences at the University of Cincinnati. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grants IBN- 0239164 and IOS1026995 to GWU), the American Arachno- logical Society (BM) and the University of Cincinnati (Wei- man-Wendell Fellowship to BM). We thank the Cincinnati Nature Center for permission to collect spiders on their Rowe Woods property and Dr. Elke Buschbeck for use of her scope and her support with dissections. We would also like to thank M. McMullen, J. Allen and A. Ficker for help in rearing spiders, J. Rutledge, J. Johns, S. Gordon, and A. Orton for other assistance, and A. Rypstra, E. Maurer, and S. Matter for comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Amaya, C.C. & P.D. Klawinski. 1996. A method for assessing gender in immature wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 24:158-160. Arnqvist, G. & L. Rowe. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Balfour, R.A., C.M. Buddie, A.L. Rypstra, S.E. Walker & S.D. Marshall. 2003. Ontogenetic shifts in competitive interactions and intra-guild predation between two wolf spider species. Ecological Entomology 28:25-30. Barth, R.H. & L.J. Lester. 1973. Neuro-hormonal control of sexual behavior in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 18:445-472. Enders, F. 1976. Clutch size related to hunting manner of spider species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 69:991- 998. Foelix, R. 1996. The Biology of Spiders. 2"“* ed. Oxford University Press. New York. Garcia-Berthou, E. 2001. On the misuse of residuals in ecology: testing regression residuals vs. the analysis of covariance. Journal of Animal Ecology 70:708-711. Gustafsson L., D. Nordling, M.S. Andersson, B.C. Sheldon & A. Qvarnstrom. 1994. Infectious diseases, reproductive effort and the cost of reproduction in birds. Phiosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 346:323- 331. Jespersen, L.B. & S. Toft. 2003. Compensatory growth following early nutritional stress in the wolf spider Parclosa prativaga. Functional Biology 17:737-746. Kreiter, N.A. & D.H. Wise. 2001. Prey availability limits fecundity and influences the movement pattern of female fishing spiders. Oecologica 127:417M24. Lehrman, D.S. 1965. Interaction between internal and external environments in the regulation of the reproductive cycle of the ring dove. Pp. 344-380. In Sex and Behavior. (F.A. Beach, ed.). Wiley, New York. Marshall, S.D., S.E. Walker & A.L. Rypstra. 2000. A test for a differential colonization and competitive ability in two generalist predators. Ecology 81:3341-3349. McNamara, J.M. & A.L Houston. 1996. State-dependent life histories. Nature 380:215-221. Moore, P.J., W.E. Harris & A.J. Moore. 2007. The cost of keeping eggs fresh: quantitative genetic variation in females that mate late relative to sexual maturation. American Naturalist 169:311-322. Moskalik, B. & G.W. Uetz. 2011. Female hunger state affects mate choice of a sexually selected trait in a wolf spider. Animal Behaviour 81:715-722. Norton, S. & G.W. Uetz. 2005. Mating frequency in Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz) wolf spiders: evidence for a mating system with female monogamy and male polygamy. Journal of Arachnology 33:16-24. Parker, G.A. & M. Begon. 1996. Optimal egg size and clutch size: effects of environment and maternal phenotype. American Naturalist 128:573. Ringo, J. 1996. Sexual receptivity in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 41:473^94. Rundus, A.S., R. Biemuller, K. DeLong, T. Fitzgerald & S. Nywandi. 2015. Age-related plasticity in male mate choice decisions by Schizocosa retorsa wolf spiders. Animal Behaviour 107:233-238. Schulte-Hostedde, A.L, B. Zinner, J.S. Millar & G.J. Hickling. 2005. Restitution of mass-size residuals: validating body condition indices. Ecology 86:155 163. Simpson, M.R. 1995. Covariation of spider egg and clutch size: the influence of foraging and paternal care. Ecology 76:795-800. Toft S. & D.H. Wise. 1999. Growth, development, and survival of a generalist predator fed single- and mixed-species diets of different quality. Oecologia 119:191-197. Trabalon, M., A. Bautz, M. Moriniere & P. Porcheron. 1992. Ovarian development and correlated changes in hemolymphatic ecdysteroid levels in two spiders, Coeloles lerrestris and Tegenaria doineslicus (Araneae, Agelenidae). General and Comparative Endocrinology 88:128-136. Trabalon, M., M. Campan, J.L. Clament, B. Thon, C. Lange & J. Lefevre. 1988. Changes in cuticular hydrocarbon composition in relation to age and sexual behavior in the female Callipliora vomitoria (Diptera). Behavioral Process 17:107-115. Uetz, G.W. & S. Norton. 2007. Preference for male traits in female wolf spiders varies with the choice of available males, female age, and reproductive state. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61:631-641. Uetz G.W., R. Papke & B. Kilinc. 2002. Influence of feeding regime on body size, body condition, and a male secondary sexual character in Schizocosa ocreata wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae): condition-dependence in a visual signaling trait. Journal of Arachnology 30:461M69. Wilgers, D.J. & E.A. Hebets. 2012. Age-related female mating decisions are condition-dependent in wolf spiders. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 66:29-38. Manuscript received 17 September 2015, revised 14 February 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:176-181 Influence of predator cues on terminal investment in courtship by male ScMzocosa ocreata (Hentz, 1844) wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) Benjamin Nickley\ Diana Saintignon^ and J. Andrew Roberts^: 'Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 318 W. 12'*^ Ave, Columbus OH 43210; "School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Rd, Columbus OH 43210; ^Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University at Newark, 1179 University Drive, Newark OH 43055. E-mail: roberts.762@osu.edu Abstract. Sexual signals play a critical role in mate attraction, but fitness benefits of signal production depend on a number of external and internal influences. Sexual signaling can be energetically expensive, and has potential to attract unwanted attention from predators. Male brushlegged wolf spiders, Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz, 1844) (Araneae: Lycosidae), actively signal to females in the leaf litter habitat during their spring breeding season, but face a tradeoff between current and future reproduction as the season progresses. The terminal investment hypothesis predicts that with fewer available females, increasing risk of predation, and stronger influence of senescence as the season progresses, males should take greater risks to secure mating. We explored this idea by exposing males of increasing ages to female cues alone or female cues combined with predator cues. We found little or no direct evidence to support the terminal investment hypothesis in this species, in that males across all ages essentially ceased active courtship in the presence of predator cues, that is, there was no age related increase in courtship investment in the presence of predator cues. However, we found distinct evidence of senescence in males based on age-related changes in behavior, which has not previously been directly explored in this species. While males maintained similar levels of active courtship across all age classes (in the absence of predator cues), older males increased their relative investment in maintenance behaviors (grooming) and decreased non- courtship display behaviors such as tapping and leg raises. These findings suggest that studies of male behavior in this species should be carefully designed to control for age-related variation in behavioral response. Keywords: Senescence, predation, age effects, chemical cues, context dependence Sexual signaling is known to be critical for mate attraction in many species. Individuals produce signals that have been shaped over evolutionary time to maximize transmission, reception, and receiver response (Andersson 1994; Johnstone 1996; Rowe 1999; Bradbury & Vehrencamp 2011). Male sexual signals are often elaborate and conspicuous, potentially indicating male quality to females through size and/or symmetry of traits or degree of courtship vigor (Clutton- Brock & Albon 1979; Parker 1983; Kodrick-Brown & Brown 1984; Hebets & Uetz 1999; Byers et al. 2010). However, sexual signals do not evolve in a vacuum and the fitness benefits associated with signaling are contingent upon both external (ecological/environmental) and internal (physiological) fac¬ tors. Many studies have shown that male traits favored by females through mate attraction impose energetic costs and/or increased the risk of predation on males (Andersson 1986; Magnhagen 1991; Zuk & Kolluru 1998; Roberts et al. 2007; Cady et al. 2011), but far fewer studies have investigated the combined effects of physiological condition, such as age- related performance declines (i.e., senescence), and external influences (e.g., predator cues) on courtship behavior. Selection should favor males who respond to internal and external influences in a way that maximizes potential fitness benefits associated with signaling (Bradbury & Vehrencamp 2011; Reichard & Anderson 2015). This is especially true for males that face a declining chance of reproduction due to senescence and/or increasing predation. The terminal invest¬ ment hypothesis suggests that males who face a tradeoff between current and future reproduction, especially where chances of future reproduction are small, should increasingly invest effort in high risk/high reward behaviors like active, complex signaling and courtship (Clutton-Brock 1984; Part et al. 1992). Such an investment might increase mortality and/or the influence of senescence (Bonduriansky et al. 2008), but would raise the chances of successful reproduction even when obstacles to reproduction are ever increasing (Clutton-Brock 1984; Bonduriansky et al. 2008). The brushlegged wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz, 1844), has been a rewarding model for the study of sexual signaling and mate choice (Uetz & Roberts 2002; Hebets & Papa) 2005), and can be used as a model for investigating issues of behavioral plasticity and context-dependent signaling (Hebets 2011; Clark et al. 2012). Schizocosa ocreata is a common ground-dwelling wolf spider abundant in leaf litter of eastern deciduous forests of North America (Dondale & Redner 1990). Females are cryptic and relatively sedentary within the leaf-litter environment, while males traverse the forest floor and actively seek and court hidden females by displaying complex, multimodal signals (Aspey 1976; Cady 1983; Uetz & Roberts 2002; Uetz et al. 2013). Females select males based on size and symmetry of morphological characters (tufts) as well as aspects of courtship vigor (Uetz & Roberts 2002; Hebets & Papaj 2005; Byers et al. 2010). Female receptivity to male courtship increases until females reach approximately three weeks post adult molt, after which receptivity begins a steady decline with advancing age (Uetz & Norton 2007). Males will mate multiple times given the opportunity in this scramble-competition polygyny system (Norton & Uetz 2005; Uetz & Norton 2007), but females typically mate only once after which they become highly 176 NICKLEY ET AL.— PREDATOR INFLUENCE ON COURTSHIP SENESCENCE 177 aggressive toward further mating attempts, attacking and often cannibalizing the male (Uetz & Norton 2007). The silk draglines and associated chemical cues deposited by females as they move through the environment play a critical role in eliciting male courtship. The cues of a female conspecific elicit male courtship responses even in the absence of the female (Stratton & Uetz 1981), and provide valuable information to males including species identity, female age, and mating status (Roberts & Uetz 2004a, b, 2005). Males can also detect and discriminate heterospecific, potentially preda¬ tory spider species, and aggressive, mated female conspecifics by their silk and chemical cues, and have shown a decreased courtship response to potentially dangerous congeners, especially predators (i.e., Tigrosa spp., see Persons et al. 2002; Roberts & Uetz 2004b; Fowler-Finn & Hebets 2011). The breeding season of Schizocosa ocreata occurs for a relatively brief, 5-8 week period in the spring (May/June), and the relative proportion of available, unmated females decreas¬ es while the number of potentially cannibalistic, mated females increases (Roberts unpubl.). Males, therefore, have a decreas¬ ing chance of mating and increasing chance of being eaten by aggressive females or heterospecific predators as the season progresses. Here we investigate the terminal investment hypothesis for male S. ocreata by exploring the interaction between physiological condition (age/senescence) and suppression of courtship induced by environmental predator cues. If the terminal investment hypothesis is valid in this species, then males should exhibit plasticity in their courtship behavior in response to external and internal conditions. Males decrease investment in conspicuous courtship behavior in the presence of predator cues in general (Roberts & Uetz 2004b; Fowler- Finn & Hebets 2011), but if males suffer reduced reproductive potential as they age, older age classes will be more likely to engage in risky courtship behavior, that is, courtship in the presence of predator cues. We compared the courtship behavior of males from four different age groups exposed to female cues alone or to combined female and predator cue treatments to determine whether males exhibit a plastic courtship response to either ecological or physiological factors. METHODS Spider collection and maintenance. — Juvenile Schizocosa ocreata were collected from The Dawes Arboretum, Licking County, Ohio, USA (39.97849°N, 82.41 614°W) in late April 2010. Female sub-adult and adult Tigrosa helluo (Walckenaer, 1837) were collected from Waterman Farm at The Ohio State University, Franklin County, Ohio, USA (40.01220°N, 83.03937°W) in October 2009 and May 2010. Only female T. helluo were used in experiments, as females of this species are considerably larger and generally more likely to attack prey than males or juveniles (Walker & Rypstra 2002), and are known to readily accept Schizocosa as prey (Roberts, personal observation). Schizocosa were housed individually in plastic containers (540 ml, round), with ~20 mm moistened peat moss as a substrate and ad libitum water source, and Tigrosa were housed similarly in larger containers (950 ml) with more substrate (~50 mm) to allow burrowing. All individuals were maintained at room temperature (22-25°C), stable humidity. and a 13:1 Ih light:dark cycle to simulate spring lighting conditions. Tigrosa helluo were fed a bitypic diet once a week that included one to two adult crickets and one to two mealworms. Schizocosa ocreata were fed twice weekly with three to four fruit flies {Drosophila melanogaster) or two to three 1 -week-old cricket nymphs (Acheta domesticus) as appropriate for their size. All S. ocreata were checked daily for ecdysis to determine date of maturation for tracking adult age following the ultimate molt. Silk collection and substrate preparation. — Wolf spiders deposit silk and chemical cues as they traverse their environment, and female cues, even in the absence of females themselves, are known to induce males to court (Stratton & Uetz 1981; Roberts & Uetz 2005; Foelix 2011). Further, silk and chemical cues of Tigrosa spp. are known to elicit anti¬ predator behaviors in this and other wolf spider species (Roberts & Uetz 2004b; Bell et al. 2006; Fowler-Finn & Hebets 2011). In order to induce S. ocreata male courtship and/or anti-predator responses, we collected silk and associ¬ ated cues from conspecific females, and from predatory female T. helluo. Prior to each trial, we placed an individual female S. ocreata on a clean sheet of filter paper (Fisherbrand, 90 mm diameter, round) in an opaque plastic container (90 mm diameter) and using a small brush, gently induced her to make 50 laps around the outside of the filter paper to standardize the amount of cue material deposited. Female conspecifics used for cue deposition were unmated and ranged in age from two to four weeks post-ultimate molt (period of peak receptivity, see Uetz & Norton 2007). Filter papers used in the predator trials were first laden with conspecific female cues as above, after which we placed individual T. helluo on each filter paper and induced them to make 50 laps in the same manner as S. ocreata females, depositing their cues on top of the S. ocreata cues. Preliminary experiments showed no difference in male signaling behavior resulting from order of cue deposition in predator trials. Individual spiders were used only once for silk deposition and no spider was fed within 24 hours of trials, to both standardize hunger and reduce fecal contamination of cues. All trials occurred within 10 minutes of completing the silk deposition stage. Experimental design. — To test the hypothesis that differenc¬ es in male age are correlated with differences in courtship behavior in the presence of predator cues, we conducted a two- way MANOVA design experiment with male age (one to four weeks of maturity) and predator cues (present/absent) as factors, individuals as replicates, and behaviors (Table 1) as multiple dependent variables. The cohort of males available for this study all matured within a five day period in order to synchronize age effects and the timing of trials as closely as possible. We selected 90 male S. ocreata from the lab population as they molted to maturity and randomly assigned each to one of the eight, age-by-predator cue treatment groups (final sample sizes were approximately 1 1 per treatment group). We used each male only once within 48 hrs of reaching the appropriate age post adult molt such that males “one week old” were six to eight days post maturity when used in experiments, males two weeks old were 13 to 15 days post maturity, etc. We conducted behavioral assay trials in clear plastic arenas (250 X 100 X 100 mm) where we placed filter paper disks 178 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1. — Ethogram of male Schizocosa ocreata behaviors (adapted from Stratton and Uetz 1986; Delaney et al. 2007). Behavior Description Jerky Tap Tap Leg Raise Chemoexplore Grooming Locomotion Stationary Active, visual and seismic courtship where the male locomotes with rapid jerky movements while tapping the forelegs, and occasionally the ventral body surface, on the substrate. Seismic signals in the form of percussion and stridulation are also produced. Sometimes called double tap, one or both forelegs actively tapped on the substrate. Also called “arch” and/or “wave”, one or both forelegs is raised above parallel to the substrate then lowered without striking the substrate. Exploratory behavior where the anteriolateral palp surfaces are rubbed on the substrate while slowly locomoting. The legs or pedipalps are drawn through the chelicerae, or lateral pairs of legs are brushed together rapidly. Walking, includes wall climbing. Motionless. containing cues of female conspecifics, and predators as appropriate, silk side up on the bottom of the arena immediately prior to the onset of each trial. We then carefully deposited males into the arena from above and video-recorded their response to cues for 300s. Following each trial, we removed and discarded the cue disks, cleaned the arena using 70% ethanol and a Kimwipe to remove any residual chemical or silk cues, and allowed the arena to air dry. All recorded trials were later scored for total duration (s) and frequency (number/300s) of male courtship (Jerky Tap), display (Tap and Leg Raise), exploratory (Chemoexplore), antipredator (Stationary) and other, less common behaviors (Table 1), using a freely available behavioral analysis program, JWatcher (vers. 1.0). We transformed the resulting data appropriately (log total duration and square root frequency), removed outliers, and ran correlation matrices on all possible combi¬ nations of dependent variables to meet the assumptions of both MANOVA (Tabachnick & Fidell 2001), and subsequent ANOVA (Martin & Bateson 2007), then analyzed using JMP (vers. 9; SAS Institute). RESULTS Frequency and total duration of behaviors were initially analyzed using MANOVA. The overall model in each case was highly significant (Frequency - Wilks’ Lambda F49 339 49 = 5.785, P <0.0001; Total Duration - Wilks’ Lambda F49,339 49 = 4.779, P <0.0001). There was a significant effect of both male age (Wilks’ Lambda F2i,i9o.o7 = 3.645, P <0.0001) and the presence of predator cues (Fy gg = 30.611, P <0.0001) on the frequency of male behaviors, and the interaction was significant (Wilks’ Lambda F21, 190.07 = 2.300, P = 0.0017). Results were similar for the total duration data where there were significant effects of male age (Wilks’ Lambda F21, 190.07 = 4.379, P <0.0001) and predator cues (Fyge = 37.398, P <0.0001) on the total duration of male behaviors, also with a significant interaction (Wilks’ Lambda F21, 190.07 = 3.044, P <0.0001). The MANOVA analysis should be interpreted with caution as we found high negative correlation between the behavior “stationary” and other behavioral states. The accepted solution would be to remove the redundant variable (stationary) from analysis (Tabachnick & Fidell 2001), but since this behavior is also an important antipredator response, we felt strongly that it should be included. Further, the highly significant interaction terms make interpretation of the analysis difficult. For these reasons, we also analyzed each behavior independently using two-way ANOVA with Bonfer- roni adjustment (Tables 2, 3) (Tabachnick & Fidell 2001). The presence of predator cues had a strong negative effect on frequency and total duration of active courtship behavior (Jerky Tap) of male S. ocreata, irrespective of male age (Tables 2, 3; Fig. 1). Frequency and total duration of Tap, a common Table 2. — ANOVA results for mean frequency of behavioral bouts (number/300s trial) for male Schizocosa ocreata. (* Indicates significance after Bonferroni correction (o(=0.007)) Display Behaviors Source df Jerky Tap Tap Leg Raise F P F P F P Male Age 3,72 0.082 0.970 7.634 <0.001* 10.413 <0.001* Predator Cues 1,72 22.148 <0.001* 18.770 <0.001* 66.929 <0.001* Age X Cues 3,72 0.875 0.458 4.201 0.009 6.117 <0.001* Other Behaviors Chemoexplore Grooming Locomotion Stationary Source df F P F P F p F P Male Age 3,72 1.278 0.289 5.324 0.002* 2.669 0.054 4.264 0.008 Predator Cues 1,72 5.080 0.027 0.000 1.000 17.092 <0.001* 8.599 0.005^ Age X Cues 3,72 0.847 0.473 0.383 0.766 2.734 0.050 2.993 0.036 NICKLEY ET AL.— PREDATOR INFLUENCE ON COURTSHIP SENESCENCE 179 Table 3. — ANOVA results for mean total duration (s) of behaviors for male Schizocosa ocreata. (* Indicates significance after Bonferroni correction (o(==0.007)) Display Behaviors Source df Jerky Tap Tap Leg Raise F P F P F P Male Age 3,72 0.084 0.968 7.324 <0.001* 12.381 <0.001* Predator Cues 1,72 22.401 <0.001* 5.045 0.028 83.359 <0.001* Age X Cues 3,72 1.031 0.384 2.253 0.089 7.425 <0.001* Other Behaviors Chemoexplore Grooming Locomotion Stationary Source df F P F P F p F P Male Age 3,72 0.810 0.487 6.544 <0.001* 2.246 0.090 1.684 0.178 Predator Cues 1,72 0.894 0.348 0.000 1.000 8.362 <0.005* 10.513 0.002* Age X Cues 3,72 1.094 0.357 1.007 0.395 1.711 0.172 1.315 0.276 male display trait correlated with active courtship, also declined significantly with male age, but was only slightly negatively impacted by the presence of predator cues (Tables 2, 3; Fig. 2). Leg Raises were significantly affected by both increasing male age and predator cues such that the behavior was performed almost exclusively in the presence of predator cues, but declined in both frequency and duration with increasing male age (Tables 2, 3; Fig. 3). The number and duration of bouts of Chemoexploratory behavior was largely unaffected by either predator cues or male age (Tables 2, 3), and while there was no detectable influence of predator cues on grooming, males groomed significantly more often and for longer periods as they aged (Tables 2, 3; Fig. 4). Neither locomotion nor time spent stationary was influenced by male age, but males spent more and longer periods stationary and fewer, shorter periods locomoting in the presence of predator cues (Tables 2, 3). DISCUSSION First, and importantly, the frequency and total duration of active, mate-seeking exploratory behavior (Chemoexplore) was consistent across trials, unaffected by advancing male age or the presence of predator cues (Tables 2, 3), so males were clearly able to detect the presence of conspecific female cues even under the influence of predator cues. All subsequent results, then, are unlikely to be a consequence of “masking” of conspecific female cues by predator cues. As suggested in previous studies of this species (Roberts & Uetz 2004b; Fowler-Finn & Hebets 2011), our results support that male S. ocreata are able to detect and respond to cues of potential predators by drastically modifying their behavior, even when no predator is physically present and predator cues are presented along with conflicting conspecific female cues. Further, increasing male age has a strong effect on some, but not all, male behaviors performed in response to female 50 ^ 40 3, o 'I 30 3 •o S 2 c re as 1 20 10 Predator cues No predator cues Male age (weeks) Figure 1. — Mean total duration (s) (-I-SE) of jerky tap behavior (active courtship) for male Schizocosa ocreata exposed to the silk and chemical cues of females in the presence or absence of predator cues. 16 1 14 - 2 12 - c o m 10 - 3 ■s 8 - 3 © 4-8 6 - c m 4 - 2 - Predator cues No predator cues il i\ 12 3 4 Male age (weeks) Figure 2. — Mean total duration (s) (+SE) of tapping behavior for male Schizocosa ocreata exposed to the silk and chemical cues of females in the presence or absence of predator cues. 180 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Male age (weeks) Figure 3. — Mean total duration (s) (+SE) of leg raise behavior for male Schizocosa ocreata exposed to the silk and chemical cues of females in the presence or absence of predator cues. Male age (weeks) Figure 4. — Mean total duration (s) (+SE) of grooming behavior for male Schizocosa ocreata exposed to the silk and chemical cues of females in the presence or absence of predator cues. cues. Counter to our terminal investment predictions, we found no meaningful interaction between increasing male age (senescence) and presence of predator cues, suggesting that male S. ocreata may not compensate for reduced reproductive potential by increasing use of risky, complex courtship behavior as they age. Male S. ocreata exhibited equivalent levels of active courtship across all age categories when exposed to conspecific female cues alone (Fig. 1), suggesting that male courtship vigor may not measurably senesce with increasing age. Alternatively, and perhaps more likely, males may invest additional resources into active courtship to meet some threshold of vigor generally acceptable to receptive females (Delaney et al. 2007; Shamble et al. 2009; Byers et al. 2010), which is in line with predictions of terminal investment (Clutton-Brock 1984). In stark contrast to the effects of increasing age, males were unlikely to perform the prominent “Jerky Tap” courtship display behavior when cues of predatory T. lielluo were present (Fig. 1). This does not support terminal investment under influence of predation, but does confirm similar findings of two previous studies. Roberts and Uetz (2004b), as part of an exploration of the species-specificity of female S. ocreata chemical cues, found that while males would occasionally court in response to silk and chemical cues of female spiders within, and even far outside, the wolf spider family (Lycosidae), they would not court in response to female T. helhio cues. Fowler-Finn and Hebets (2011), using number of body bounces as a proxy for male courtship, found that courtship was greatly reduced in the presence of Tigrosa spp. cues. Altogether, the results of these three studies suggest that a significant reduction in active courtship is an anti-predator response in this species. Complex, multimodal courtship by male S. ocreata, per¬ formed in this context-dependent manner, may benefit males in reproduction but must be severely costly in terms of increased predation risk (Roberts et al. 2007; Roberts & Uetz 2008). While active courtship may be reduced or extinguished in the presence of predator cues across all age groups, younger males (one to two weeks post adult molt) instead adopted other, less “active” display traits (Figs. 2, 3). Leg Raise behaviors were performed almost exclusively in the presence of predator cues (Fig. 3), but were also clear indicators of male senescence with frequency and duration declining significantly with increasing age. Frequency and duration of tapping (Tap) also declined with age, and declined slightly faster in the presence of predator cues (Fig. 2). The most telling indicator of senescence in males is the significant increase in grooming activity with age, whether or not predator cues were present (Fig. 4). Like many spiders, wolf spiders cease molting at maturity (Foelix 2011). Physical traits, such as the tufts of foreleg bristles male S. ocreata use in signaling to females, would be subject to wear as males age and thus an increase in maintenance behaviors like grooming is to be expected. Any shift in time allocation to grooming, though, must be balanced by shifts in other behaviors. If males maintain consistent courtship effort as they age, as it appears they do (Fig. 1), then this allocation shift may explain the decline in less critical display behaviors like leg raise or tapping (Figs. 2, 3). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank Ryan Bell and Samantha Herrmann for their support and guidance as this project progressed. We are also grateful to the many undergraduate students who helped rear and maintain spiders for this work, especially M. Campbell, B. Paniccia, I. Ackers, and B. Zajd. This work was supported, in part, by two OSU Dean of Arts and Sciences, Departmental Research Grants (BN), an OSU Undergraduate Student Government Academic Enrichment Grant (BN), and an Ohio State Newark Scholarly Activities Grant (JAR). Voucher specimens are maintained in the collections of the corresponding author (JAR) and the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. NICKLEY ET AL.— PREDATOR INFLUENCE ON COURTSHIP SENESCENCE 181 LITERATURE CITED Andersson, M. 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex orna¬ ments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40:804-816. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Aspey, W.P. 1976. Behavioral ecology of the “edge effect” in Schizocosa crassipes (Araneae: Lycosidae). Psyche 83:42-50. Bell, R.D., A.L. Rypstra & M.H. Persons. 2006. The effect of predator hunger on chemically mediated antipredator responses and survival in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Ethology 112:903-910. Bonduriansky, R., A. Maklakov, F. Zajitschek & R. Brooks. 2008. The evolutionary ecology of senescence: Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span. Functional Ecology 22:443^53. Bradbury, J.W. & S.L. Vehrencamp. 2011. Principles of Animal Communication. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, Massachu¬ setts. Byers, J., E. Hebets & J. Podos. 2010. Female mate choice based upon male motor performance. Animal Behaviour 79:771-778. Cady, A.B. 1983. Microhabitat selection and locomotor activity of Schizocosa ocreata (Walckenaer) (Araneae: Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 11:297-307. Cady, A.B., K.J. Delaney & G.W. Uetz. 2011. Contrasting energetic costs of courtship signaling in two wolf spiders having divergent courtship behaviors. Journal of Arachnology 39:161-165. Clark, D.L., J.A. Roberts «& G.W. Uetz. 2012. Eavesdropping and signal matching in visual courtship displays in spiders. Biology Letters 8:375-378. Clutton-Brock, T.H. 1984. Reproductive effort and terminal invest¬ ment in iteroparous animals. American Naturalist 123:212-229. Clutton-Brock, T.H. & S.D. Albon. 1979. The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. Behaviour 69:145-169. Delaney, K.J., J.A. Roberts & G.W. Uetz. 2007. Male signaling behavior and sexual selection in a wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae): a test for dual function. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62:67-75. Dondale, C.D. & J.H. Redner. 1990. The wolf spiders, nurseryweb spiders, and lynx spiders of Canada and Alaska (Araneae: Lycosidae, Pisauridae, and Oxyopidae), vol 17. The Insects and Arachnids of Canada. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa. Foelix, R.F. 2011. Biology of Spiders (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford. Fowler-Finn, K.D. & E.A. Hebets. 2011. The degree of response to increased predation risk corresponds to male secondary sexual traits. Behavioral Ecology 22:268-275. Hebets, E.A. 2011. Current status and future directions of research in complex signaling. Current Zoology 57:i-v. Hebets, E.A & D.R. Papaj. 2005. Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57:197-214. Hebets, E.A. & G.W. Uetz. 1999. Female responses to isolated signals from multimodal male courtship displays in the wolf spider genus Schizocosa (Araneae: Lycosidae). Animal Behaviour 57:865-872. Johnstone, R.A. 1996. Multiple displays in animal communication: ‘backup signals’ and ‘multiple messages’. Philosophical Transac¬ tions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 351:329-338. Kodric-Brown, A. & J.H. Brown. 1984. Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. American Naturalist 124:309-323. Magnhagen, C. 1991 . Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:183-186. Martin, P. & P. Bateson. 2007. Measuring Behaviour: An Introduc¬ tory Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Norton, S. & G.W. Uetz. 2005. Mating frequency in Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz) wolf spiders: evidence for a mating system with female monandry and male polygyny. Journal of Arachnology 33:16-24. Parker, G.A. 1983. Mate quality and mating decisions. Pp. 141-166. In Mate Choice. (P. Bateson, ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Part, T., L. Gustafsson & J. Moreno. 1992. “Terminal Investment” and a sexual conflict in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). American Naturalist 140:868-882. Persons, M.H., S.E. Walker & A.L. Rypstra. 2002. Fitness costs and benefits of antipredator behavior mediated by chemotactile cues in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behavioral Ecology 13:386-392. Reichard, D.G. & R.C. Anderson. 2015. Why signal softly? The structure, function, and evolutionary significance of low-amplitude signals. Animal Behaviour 105:253-265. Roberts, J.A. & G.W. Uetz. 2004a. Chemical signaling in a wolf spider: a test of ethospecies discrimination. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30:1271-1284. Roberts, J.A. & G.W. Uetz. 2004b. Species-specificity of chemical signals: silk source affects discrimination in a wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 17:477^91. Roberts, J.A. & G.W. Uetz. 2005. Discrimination of female reproductive state from chemical cues in silk by males of the wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata (Araneae, Lycosidae). Animal Behav¬ iour 70:217-223. Roberts, J.A. & G.W. Uetz. 2008. Discrimination of variation in a male signaling trait affects detection time in visual predators. Ethology 114:557-563. Roberts, J.A., P.W. Taylor & G.W. Uetz. 2007. Consequences of complex signaling: predator detection of multimodal cues. Behavioral Ecology 18:236-240. Rowe, C. 1999. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicom¬ ponent signals. Animal Behaviour 58:921-931. Shamble, P.S., D.J. Wilgers, K.A. Swoboda & E.A. Hebets. 2009. Courtship effort is a better predictor of mating success than ornamentation for male wolf spiders. Behavioral Ecology 20:1242- 1251. Stratton, G.E. & G.W. Uetz. 1981. Acoustic communication and reproductive isolation in two species of wolf spiders. Science 214:575-577. Tabachnick, B.G. & L.S. Fidell. 2001. Using Multivariate Statistics (4''’ ed.). Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights. Uetz, G.W. & S. Norton. 2007. Preference for male traits in female wolf spiders varies with the choice of available males, female age and reproductive state. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61:631-641. Uetz, G.W. & J.A. Roberts. 2002. Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 59:222-230. Uetz, G.W., J.A. Roberts, D.L. Clark, J.S. Gibson & S.D. Gordon. 2013. Multimodal signals increase active space of communication by wolf spiders in a complex litter environment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67:1471-1482. Walker, S.E. & A.L. Rypstra. 2002. Sexual dimorphism in trophic morphology and feeding behavior of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) as a result of differences in reproductive roles. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80:679-688. Zuk, M. & G.R. Kolluru. 1998. Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Quarterly Review of Biology 73:415- 438. Manuscript received 2 September 2015, revised 17 February 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:182-193 Spatial patterns and environmental determinants of community composition of web-buiMing spiders in understory across edges between rubber plantations and forests Booppa Petcharad', Tadashi Miyashita^, George A. Gale^, Sunthorn Sotthibandhu' and Sara Bumrungsri*: 'Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 901 12, Thailand. E-mail: zigzagargiope@ yahoo.com; "Laboratory of Biodiversity Science, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Science, The University of Tokyo, Japan; ^Conservation Biology Program, School of Bioresources and Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Thailand Abstract. Rubber plantations in Southeast Asia have expanded greatly in recent decades, thereby increasing the amount of edges bounding natural forests. In this study, we focused on the effects of rubber plantation-forest edges on species diversity and abundance of web-building spiders. We also aimed to reveal environmental determinants that influence such patterns. We visually searched and collected spiders within 85 quadrats from October to January (heavy rain period), and 160 quadrats from May to September (light rain period). The quadrats were placed in five sites representing rubber plantations, rubber plantation-forest edge, and forest interior up to 150 m from the edge. We examined understory characteristics, microclimate, and potential prey within each quadrat. Certain species were abundant in rubber plantations, others were abundant at the edge or within the forest, and others showed no pattern. Species richness was not related to the edge whereas species diversity and total abundance of the spiders was higher in the rubber plantation and decreased at the rubber plantation-forest edge and into the forest interior. Temperature range and average temperature appear to drive the distribution patterns of species diversity and total abundance. Characteristics of understory, namely dry twigs and seedlings also tended to affect such patterns. Temperature probably affected the spiders’ ability to maintain favorable body temperatures whereas dry twigs and seedlings probably provide reliable web support and suitable refuges. Keywords: Alpha diversity, Araneae, edge effect, peninsular Thailand, temperature Recent deforestation in Southeast Asia has been rapid due to the large-scale expansion of rubber plantations (Li et al. 2007). Replacing natural forests by rubber plantations can reduce biodiversity through habitat fragmentation as well as forest degradation (Zhai et al. 2012). An increase of edge habitats and effects of edges are among the phenomena caused by the fragmentation; they may affect the distributions and the interactions of organisms in the ecosystem (Ries et al. 2004). Despite the situation mentioned above resulting in an increase of rubber plantations-forest edges, studies on the effect of this edge type on biodiversity are sparse. Spiders are reliable bioindicators of environmental change in tropical ecosystems (Malumbres-Olarte et al. 2013). Web builders are sit-and-wait spiders that directly use webs for capturing prey; they stay within the small range of their webs, so have small home ranges (Miyashita et al. 1998). They are highly sensitive to environmental changes (Lessard et al. 2010). Accordingly, the web builders appear to be suitable animal models to assess edge effects, especially in small-scale ecosystems. A number of studies have shown edge effects on arthropod abundance and richness (Bogyo et al. 2015; Lacasella & Zapparoli 2015). Their patterns along edge gradients varied depending on taxa or vegetation type (Albrecht et al. 2010; Rykken et al. 201 1). Some studies reported no detectable edge effects on the abundance of several groups of arthropods (Jabin et al. 2004). On spider diversity, most studies have shown positive edge effects (Galle & Feher 2006; Rodrigues et al. 2014) while a few studies have shown negative edge effects (Rodrigues et al. 2014) or no edge effects (Pearce et al. 2005). Also, a few studies have shown intermediate effects on spider diversity whereby at a plantation/pasture edge, spiders were more abundant relative to the forest plantation, but less abundant relative to the grass pasture (Downie et al. 1996). Specific studies on distribution patterns of web-building spider assemblages along edge gradients and environmental variables influencing these patterns are described by Baldissera et al. (2004, 2008). The edge between Araucaria forest and Pinus plantation did not significantly affect richness and abundance of web-building spiders (Baldissera et al. 2008), while the richness and abundance were positively affected by the edge between pasture and Araucaria forest. The latter pattern was positively influenced by vegetation species richness (Baldissera et al. 2004). In this study we focused on the effects of rubber plantation- forest edge on web-building spiders. Our first objective was to investigate changes in species diversity, richness, and abun¬ dance of the spiders from rubber plantations across edges toward forest interiors. The edge effects can occur both at community and species levels of spiders. At a community level, we expected that the spider diversity, richness, and total abundance would be highest in rubber plantations, where the understory habitat has relatively high complexity and density, and that it would decrease at the edge toward the forest which had a relatively sparse understory in our study area. At the species level, we expected that abundance of different species would vary in response to edge because of differences in microhabitat preference. Although it is broadly known that environmental conditions influence spiders (Entling et al. 2007), the key environmental variables are not well under¬ stood, especially in the inter-habitat transition zones. Conse¬ quently, our second objective was to analyze environmental variables determining the patterns of spiders along the edge gradients. Based on previous research mentioned above, we 182 PETCHARAD ET AL — FACTORS DRIVING EDGE EFFECTS IN SPIDERS 183 ! A Sampling location • Village location /\/Main road Evergreen forest I I Rubber plantation Forest plantation mu Annual cropland research station S] Others Figure 1. — A map of the study area, including the Khuan Khao Wang Forest Park (the dark grey component), and the rubber plantation zone (the white component). The black triangular symbols indicate the sampling locations where belt transects were set to extend from the rubber plantation into the forest. predicted that vegetation complexity and density of understo¬ ry would be the primary determinants. METHODS Study area. — The study was carried out in Khuan Khao Wang Forest Park (area = 3.26 km^), Hat Yai District, Songkhla Province, southern Thailand (6°59"N, 100°18"E, 200 m a. s. 1.) (Fig. 1). This forest park is a secondary forest remnant composed of semi-evergreen lowland trees, and has been naturally reforested for about 25 years since the termination of the logging concession. Logging began in 1970 and was terminated a few years later. Then, in 1995, the forest was assigned protected area status. The dominant trees in the forest park were Bairmgtonia spp., Diospyros spp., Dipterocarpus alatus Roxb. Ex G. Don, Eugenia spp., Fagraea fragrans Roxb., Intsia spp., Lithocarpus spp., Morinda spp., Pterocarpus spp., and Shorea spp. This protected area has a hill (200 m a. s. 1.) and a few seasonal streams, and is surrounded by rubber plantations, forest plantations, a small area of cropland, a few palm plantations, and houses. Outside the boundaries of the forest park, the monoculture rubber plantations are dominant. The forest plantations have Dipterocapus alatus Roxb. ex G. Don, Intsia palemhanica Miq., Hopea odorata Roxb., Shorea roxburghii G. Don, Azadiraclita excels (Jack) Jacobs, and Casuarina equisetifolia J.R. & G. Forst. Most of the rubber plantations are mature (7-25 years old) with a canopy height of approximately 14 m; the rubber trees within each plantation are about the same age and height. Generally, the rubber trees are planted at 3 m intervals within each row, and 7 m spacing between the rows. The understory vegetation consists of grasses, sedges, herbs, ferns, vines, woody seedlings, and lianas, which are signif¬ icantly denser in the rubber plantations than in the forests. Generally, the woody seedlings are dominant in the forest understory, while grasses are almost absent. In contrast, various species of grasses and herbs are the dominant vegetation in the rubber plantations. Human disturbances, including mowing and latex tapping, take place regularly in the rubber plantations. Traditionally, farmers slash or mow the understory in their plantations once a year, and they routinely walk the tracks along the rubber tree rows in order 184 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 2. — The arrangement of 15 X 2 m sampling plots, crossing the forest boundary and extending to the forest interior and the rubber plantation. The understory, sapling, and tree densities were assessed by sampling these plots. to tap the latex. The mean annual precipitation during 2003- 2012 was 1890.3 ± 122.4 mm (mean ± SE). Generally, there are two seasons in the study area; dry and wet. Based on Mohr (1944), the dry season is from February to mid-April (mean monthly precipitation across 2003-2012 = 58.3 ± 15.2 mm). The wet season can be divided into two periods: the period of light rain from May to September (mean monthly precipita¬ tion across 2003-2012 = 86.1 ± 7.7 mm), and the period of heavy rain from October to January (mean monthly precip¬ itation across 2003-2012 = 309.9 ± 34.6 mm) (Rattaphum meteorological station, unpublished data). Edge determination. — The vegetation characteristics were assessed along paths from the rubber plantation into the forest, in order to determine the position and width of the edge zone between the rubber plantation and the forest. We selected rubber plantations of at least 15 years of age that had not had herbicides or insecticides applied for the last 10 years (based on interviews of rubber farmers), and had not had understory mowing during the last 6 months. We identified the line across which the vegetative contrast was strongest, approaching the forest from the rubber plantation (Cadenasso et al. 2003). We established belt transects of 15 m width, extending 20 m into the rubber plantation and 50 m into the forest from the forest boundary (the contrast line), spaced 30 m apart. We outlined 15 X 2 m plots in the rubber plantation and in the forest, on both sides of the forest boundary and then at every 10 m (Fig. 2), and counted saplings and trees (woody plants > 1.5 m tall) in the plots. We further outlined 1 X 1 m subplots at the center, as well as in the upper right and lower left corners of each plot, and assessed the understory in these subplots (see “Assessment of environmental variables” for details). Study design. — We applied an interrupted belt transect sampling method on the rubber plantation across the edge toward the forest interior. Each transect was at least 50 m away from the outer bounds of the rubber plantation and the •tI o g I (T § Figure 3. — The arrangement of 3 X 2 m quadrats for collecting spiders and assessing environmental variables at each site along belt transects spaced 20 m apart during the first session of data collection. A site was located at the edge, and others at 50 m from the edge into the rubber plantation, and 50, 100, and 150 m from the edge into the forest. During the second session of data collection, the same five sites along the transects were used, but this time 1 X 1 m quadrats were spaced 10 m apart along the transects. forest (horizontal distance shown in Fig. 3). We conducted the study in two sessions. The first session, from October 2008 to January 2009 (in the period of heavy rain) was to examine whether the edges affect the distribution of spiders. We laid 17 belt transects (3 m wide) spaced 20 m apart, and placed 3X2 m quadrats to collect spiders at five sites along each transect. The sampling sites on the transects were; at the edge, 50 m from the edge into the rubber plantation (RP); and 50 m (F050), 100 m (FlOO), and 150 m (FI 50) from the edge into the forest (Fig. 3). The second session, from June to September 2012 (during the light rain period) was to confirm an existence of edge effects and assess environmental determinants of spider distribution along the edge gradients. Because the heavy rains obstructed spider collection, we conducted data collect¬ ing of the second session in the light rains instead of the heavy rains. Spiders and data on environmental variables likely to affect their distribution patterns (see “Spider sampling and identification” and “Assessment of environmental variables” for details) were collected. We laid 32 belt transects (1 m wide) spaced 10 m apart, and placed 1 X 1 m quadrats at every 50 m for five sites along each transect, in a similar arrangement as for the first session but at a different place to avoid PETCHARAD ET AL.— FACTORS DRIVING EDGE EFFECTS IN SPIDERS !85 pseudoreplication (Fig. 3). We downsized the sampling quadrats in the second session, to be able to complete both spider and environmental variable samplings of each transect within the same day. In the rubber plantation, we placed sampling quadrats only between the rows of rubber trees and away from tracks, in order to avoid disturbance by walking farmers. Spider sampling and identification. — Within each quadrat, we found spiders during the daytime, on days without rain, from the ground up to 1.5 m height visually surveying all understories, saplings, trees, stones, and dry leaves/twigs/ branches. We searched for spiders for 25 min. in the 3 X 2 m quadrats, and for 10 min. in the 1 X 1 m quadrats, to collect as many as possible. The time taken to collect spiders was excluded from the sampling time. Along each transect we randomized the order of quadrats for collecting spiders, on every collection day, to avoid temporal confounding effects related to the time of a day. Kleptoparasitic spiders were not included in this sampling. We identified mature spiders mainly on the basis of morphological characteristics, to the extent possible. For certain spiders, we used DNA analyses for identification, focusing on the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I sampled from specimens preserved in 75% ethanol. All the procedures for DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction, and sequencing, followed Tanikawa (2012), except for the DNA extraction kit. We used a FavorPrep Tissue Genomic DNA Extraction Mini Kit (Favorgen Biotech Corp, Ping-Tung, Taiwan). We applied the nomenclature after Platnick (2014). Specimens were stored in 75% ethanol in vials, and deposited in the Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Natural History Museum at Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand. Assessment of environmental variables. We collected data on vegetation structure for edge determination. Although vegetation structure is well known to influence web-building spiders, microclimate (Sattler et al. 2010) and potential prey (Halaj et al. 2000) have been also suggested. Accordingly, to analyze environmental determinants of distribution patterns of the spiders along the edge gradients, we measured vegetation structure, microclimate and potential prey avail¬ ability for evaluating determinants of spider distribution patterns (in the second session). Vegetation structure: For edge determination, we counted the number of stems or trunks of trees and saplings in each plot. We quantified the density of understory vegetation by counting leaves of grasses/sedges/ferns, all stems of vines and lianas, and primary stems of herbs/seedlings in each subplot. For determinants of spider distribution patterns, we assessed densities of grasses, sedges, herbs, ferns, vines, lianas, seedlings, saplings, and trees by counting their buttresses, trunks, branches, stems, twigs, rachises, leaves, or inflores¬ cences within each quadrat. We then obtained a measure of vegetation complexity from the combination of all plant categories above (McCoy & Bell 1991). We measured the cover percentage of canopy by sighting with a cardboard tube with a crosshair through the canopy. This was repeated at the center and in every corner of each quadrat (simple point intercept method: James & Shugart 1970). We estimated the cover percentage of litter on the ground, and measured the litter depth in all four corners and at the center of each quadrat. We counted the numbers of stones on the ground and also counted arboreal dead leaves/twigs/branches in the quadrats up to a height of 1.5 m. Microclimate: We programmed data loggers, HOBO U12 Temp/RH/Light/External Data Logger - U12 - 012 (Onset Corporation, Bourne, MA), to record temperature, relative humidity, and light intensity at 30 min intervals, and placed them in transparent plastic rain shelters at 1 m height in every site along each transect, for a continuous period of 48 h. In each site, we randomly selected two from five points, four corners and at the center, within each quadrat. We also randomized the order of such two points for measuring microclimate in a quadrat and placed a data logger for 24 h at point one and moved to point two for continuing measure¬ ment another 24 h. From the resulting data, we calculated the daily ranges (maximum - minimum) and average values for each of the microclimate variables (Vandergast & Gillespie 2004). Prey availability: For insect sampling, we applied sticky traps made from 15 X 15 cm transparent plastic pads coated with sticky glue. Within each quadrat along the transects, we placed the traps above the ground at 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 m heights, for 72 h. Insects captured by these traps were identified to order level following Borror et al. (1989). The trapped insects were counted, and their body lengths were measured. Dry biomass of each insect was estimated using the formula fF= 0.0305L^ where W is the dry mass in mg, and L is the length in mm (Lumsden & Bennett 2005). Statistical analysis. — We applied the Shannon-Wiener diversity index to provide a measure of relative diversity of the spiders (Magurran & McGill 201 1). To standardize species richness of spiders across sampling plots, we estimated rarefied species richness by using a function from the library “vegan” in R (Oksanen 2015). To designate dominant species, we calculated the proportion of individuals of each species divided by total number of individuals. We defined dominant species as those making up > 3% of individuals in the sample following Spiller & Schoener (1998). To compare the differences in spider diversity, species richness, and abundance of species in total and each dominant species between sites, we used one-way ANOVA, where “site” was used as a fixed factor. We checked the normality of spider data, using the Wilk-Shapiro test, and tested homogeneity of variance using Bartlett’s test. The dependent variables were transformed by natural logarithms in cases where the data lacked normality or homogeneity of variance. We used Kruskal-Wallis tests when normality was not met. For post hoc multiple comparison tests, we applied Tukey’s test following one-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-test following Kruskal-Wallis tests. Be¬ cause we used the Mann-Whitney U-test, which is a pairwise comparison for simultaneous inference, we adjusted the significance level by using the Dunn-Sidak procedure, in order to reduce the possibility of Type I errors (Quinn & Keough 2002). For dominant species, since their occurrences are not independent and we repeatedly applied the test on different species, we used Bonferroni correction to reduce the possibility of Type II errors (Cabin & Mitchell 2000). For spider diversity and total abundance that demonstrate patterns along edge gradients, we evaluated key environmental variables influenc¬ ing the patterns. For abundance of the dominant species that 186 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY also demonstrated patterns along the edge gradients, we could not evaluate key environmental variables influencing their patterns because of too many zeros in the response variable data set. We applied a Gaussian generalized linear model (GLM) with an identity link to evaluate the relationship between the environmental variables and spider diversity. For the spider abundance of all species combined, we applied zero-inflated models (Zuur et al. 2009), i.e., the ZIP or the ZINB models using the “pscl” library in R (Jackman 2012). This approach was appropriate because our data had an excessive number of zeros. We used the MuMIn package in R (Barton 2012) to construct a set of alternative full models. We applied the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) for model selection and presented only the best models (Burnham & Anderson 2002). To evaluate whether there are effects of spatial autocorrelation in parameters, we assessed spatial autocorrelation of the final model with correlograms using a spline function in the ncf package in R (Bjornstad 2015). There was no significant spatial autocorrelation. We used each best model to predict the values of spider diversity and total abundance, as functions of the environmental variables, to assess the effect sizes of these variables (Martin et al. 2005). We computed the percentage of the effect size of each key environmental variable on spider diversity and the total abundance following Pilosof et al. (2012), dividing the predicted minimum value by the predicted maximum value of spider diversity and total abundance, and multiplying the result by 100. We performed all the analyses in R v.3.1.0 (R Core Team 2013). RESULTS Vegetation change and edge determination. — Understory density was higher in the rubber plantations than in the forests, decreasing sharply within 10 m of the forest boundary (from RPIO to FOO, Fig. 4A). The tree density was lower in the rubber plantation than in the forest, and had a steep increase at the transition zone to the forest (from RPOO to FOO) (Fig. 4B). Plant density changed conspicuously from 12 m within the rubber plantation to 2 m within the forest, measured from their boundary, and this defined an edge zone of approxi¬ mately 14 ni width (Figs. 2, 4). Distribution of environmental variables. — The temperature range and seedling density differed significantly between the sites (Kruskal-Wallis tests, temperature range: H4 = 54.3, P < 0.001; seedling density: H4 = 24.3, P < 0.001, Fig. 5). The temperature range was wider at the RP than at the edge and in the forest. Likewise, seedling density in the RP was significantly greater than at the edge and in the forest. The average temperature and dry twig density did not differ significantly between the sites (Kruskal-Wallis tests, average temperature: H4 = 9.6, P = 0.05; dry twig density: H4 = 8.7, P — 0.07, Fig. 5). Distribution pattern of web-building spiders. — During the first session (heavy rains), a total of 1753 spiders were collected including 917 (52.3%) juveniles and 836 (47.7%) adults. Adults belonged to 67 species of 14 families. Nine species were considered dominant, and these nine species accounted for 74% of total abundance. During the second session (light rains), a total of 908 spiders were collected, including 611 (67.3%) juveniles and 297 (32.7%) adults. Adults belonged to Figure 4. — Plots of the distribution of understory (A) and the tree density (B) along the transect extending from rubber plantation (RP) into forest (F). RPOO, RPIO, and RP20 are at distances 0, 10, and 20 m from the forest boundary to the rubber plantation, while FOO to F50 are at distances 0 to 50 m into the forest from the boundary. Points are means. Whiskers show SE. 50 species of 12 families. Nine species were considered dominant, accounting for 71% of total abundance. During the first session (heavy rains), significant differences between rubber plantation and forest sites were found in Crassignatha sp2, Araneidae gen. sp3, and Mysmenidae gen. sp3 (Table 1). The abundance of Crassignatha sp2 was significantly higher in the FI 50 than in RP (Fig. 6A). The abundance of Araneidae gen. sp3 was significantly higher at the edge than at RP and at FI 50 (Fig. 6B). The abundance of Mysmenidae gen. sp3 was significantly higher at RP than at the edge, F050, and FI 50 (Fig. 6C). The abundance of other dominant species, namely, Araneidae cf. Nemoscolus sp., Leucauge argentina (Hasselt, 1882), Linyphiidae gen. spl, Mysmenidae gen. spl, Octonoba spl, Zonia dibaiyin Miller, Griswold & Yin, 2009, did not differ significantly between rubber plantation and forest sites. During the second session (light rains), we found significant differences between the sites in Araneidae cf. Nemoscolus sp., Mysmenidae gen. spl, and Theridiidae gen. spl (Table 1). The abundance of Araneidae cf. Nemoscolus sp. was significantly higher in the FI 50 than in RP (Fig. 6D). The abundance of Mysmenidae gen. spl was significantly higher at the edge than at FlOO (Fig. 6E). The abundance of Theridiidae gen. spl was significantly higher at the rubber plantation than in the forest (Fig. 6F). The abundance of other dominant species, namely, Araneidae gen. sp3, Belisana kbaosok Huber, 2005, Lycosidae gen. sp., Linyphiidae gen. spl, Symphytognathidae gen. spl. PETCHARAD ET AL.— FACTORS DRIVING EDGE EFFECTS IN SPIDERS 187 Plot location relative to plantation-forest edge Plot location relative t© plantation-forest edge Plot location relative to plantation-forest edge Plot location relative to plantation-forest edge Figure 5. — The comparison of key environmental factors, temperature range (A), average temperature (B), seedling density (C), dry twig density (D), across the edge from rubber plantation into the forest. Bars are means. Whiskers are SE. Different letters indicate significant differences. Table 1. — A list of dominant spider species, total abundance, and results of Kruskal-Wallis test (df = 4) comparing the abundance of each species between sites from rubber plantation and forest. Bold letters indicate significant differences between sites following a post hoc test. Total abundance Kruskal-Wallis test Species H P Heavy rain period Araneidae cf. Nenioscolus sp. 67 5.4 0.25 Araneidae gen. sp3 33 19.9 < 0.001 Crassignathci sp2 93 21.9 < 0.001 Leucauge cirgentimi (Hasselt, 1882) 38 11.9 < 0.05 Linyphiidae gen. spl 74 2.4 0.66 Mysmenidae gen. spl 229 3.6 0.46 Mysmenidae gen. sp3 21 31.2 < 0.001 Octonoba spl 23 6.2 0.19 Zonia dibaiyin Miller, Griswold & Yin, 2009 39 14.7 < 0.01 Light rain period Araneidae cf. Nemoscolus sp. 32 16.6 < 0.001 Araneidae gen. sp3 9 0.8 0.94 Belisana khaosok Huber, 2005 10 6.1 0.19 Lycosidae gen. sp. 12 8.3 0.08 Linyphiidae gen. spl 16 4.7 0.31 Mysmenidae gen. spl 54 15.3 < 0.005 Theridiidae gen. spl 35 27.3 < 0.001 Symphytognathidae gen. spl 10 9.5 0.05 Symphytognathidae gen. sp2 34 9.5 0.05 Symphytognathidae gen. sp2, did not differ significantly between the sites (Table 1). During the first session (heavy rains), the diversity of spiders differed significantly between the sites (Kruskal-Wallis test, H4=14.9 , P < 0.01). It was significantly higher in the RP than at F050 (Fig. 7A). Species richness and total abundance of spiders did not differ significantly between the sites (one-way ANOVA, richness: F4, 95= 1.0, P = 0.41; abundance: F4, 95 = 1.1, P — 0.36, Fig. 7B, C). During the second session (light rains), the diversity and total abundance of spiders differed significantly between the sites (diversity: one-way ANOVA, F4, 95 = 3.9, P < 0.01; abundance: Kruskal-Wallis test, H4 = 16.4, P < 0.01). The diversity of spiders was significantly higher at RP than at FI 00 (Fig. 7D). The abundance was significantly higher both at RP and at EDGE than at FI 00 (Fig. 7F). Species richness of spiders did not differ significantly between the sites (Kruskal-Wallis test, H4 = 4.0, P = 0.40, Fig. 7E). Variables influencing the distribution pattern of web-building spiders. — The average temperature and the temperature range were significant variables affecting total abundance and diversity of spiders (Table 2). Not only temperatures but also seedlings and dry twigs affected the total abundance and the diversity. The models suggest that a wider temperature range contributed to the increase in total abundance and diversity of spiders, while increasing the average temperature reduced the 188 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Heavy rain Light rain Plot location relative to plantation-forest edge Plot location relative to plantation-forest edge Plot location relative to plantation-forest edge Plot location relative to plantation-forest edge Figure 6. — Median values with range of abundance for the dominant species of spiders from rubber plantation into forest. Dashes are medians. Whiskers show ranges. Different letters indicate significant differences. total abundance and the diversity. The numbers of seedlings and dry twigs positively influenced the total abundance and the diversity (Table 2). The zero-inflated negative-binomial model that we applied for total abundance of spiders did not show significant results (dry twig: j3 = — 0.274, Z = -0.963, P = 0.336). The fitted GLM explained 19.3% of deviance in the diversity (Table 2). Species diversity was increased by 69% (from 1.15 to 1.67), 46% (from 1.24 to 2.71), and 47% (from 1.22 to 2.60) by temperature range, seedling abundance, and number of dry twigs, respectively. The diversity declined by 62% (from 1.68 to 1.05) with average temperature (Fig. 8). Temperature range, seedling abundance, and dry twigs increased the total abundance 22% (from 0.85 to 3.91), 9% (from 1.28 to 14.10), and 8% (from 1.15 to 14.15), respectively. The total abundance declined by 20% (from 3.47 to 0.68) with average temperature (Fig. 9). FETCH ARAD ET AL.— FACTORS DRIVING EDGE EFFECTS IN SPIDERS 189 Heavy rain Light rain Plot location relative to plantation-forest edge Plot location relative to plantation-forest edge Plot location relative to plantation-forest edge Piot location relative to plantation-forest edge Piot iocation reiative to plantation-forest edge Plot location reiative to plantation-forest edge Figure 7. — The species diversity, the species richness, and the total abundance of web-building spiders from rubber plantation into forest. Mean values with SE are shown for the species diversity (D) during light rain period, and for the species richness (B) and the total abundance (C) during heavy rain period; dashes are means; whiskers are SE, Median values with range are shown for the species diversity (A) during the heavy rain period, and for the species richness (E) and the total abundance (F) during the light rain period; dashes are medians; whiskers indicate the range. Different letters indicate significant differences. DISCUSSION Effect of edge on the distribution pattern of web-building spiders. — Certain species of web-building spiders indicated the existence of the edge effect. As in previous studies (Baldissera et al. 2004; Vandergast & Gillespie 2004), the pattern of edge responses in abundance of spiders varied among different species. Edge influenced spider distribution in periods of both heavy and light rain, despite the fact that different taxa occurred in each period. Crassignatha sp2, Mysmenidae gen. sp3, and Theridiidae gen. spl, which were found only in a single period and responded to the edge, are probably sensitive to environmental change. The effects of edge on Araneidae gen. sp3, Araneidae cf. Nemoscolus sp., and Mysmenidae gen. spl, which were found in both sampling periods varied. Araneidae gen. sp3 was influenced by edge in the period of heavy rain but not in the period of light rain. Araneidae cf. Nemoscolus sp. and Mysmenidae gen. spl were influenced by edge in the light rain 190 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 2. — Summary of GLM testing the effect of four environ¬ mental variables on the diversity and total abundance of spiders. Bold values are significant at F < 0.05. Type of model Response variable Explanatory variables Estimate P Count model Diversity Average temperature -0.120 <0.001 Temperature range 0.080 <0.001 Seedlings <0.001 0.020 Dry twigs <0.001 0.040 Count model Total abundance Average temperature -0.393 <0.001 Temperature range 0.253 <0.001 Seedlings 0.001 0.007 Dry twigs 0.002 0.018 period while neither species was influenced by edge in the heavy rain period. We postulated that these three species are intermediate in sensitivity to environmental change along the edge gradients. Linyphiidae gen. spl was found in both the periods of heavy and light rain and showed no edge effect, suggesting that it is insensitive to environmental change along the edge gradients. This is the first report of an edge effect on the diversity of web builders. The distribution pattern of spider diversity showed an intermediate stage between the positive and negative effects of the edge between rubber plantation and forest. This was consistent across seasons, even though the magnitude of the effect varied seasonally. The positive effect of the edge between rubber plantation and forest was observed in spider abundance in the light rain period. This pattern is in accord with the patterns in abundance of web-building spider assemblage described by Baldissera et al. (2004) and Vander- gast & Gillespie (2004). No edge effects on spider abundance during heavy rains and species richness in both seasonal periods as revealed in the present study are similar to the results of Baldissera et al. (2008) but different from Baldissera et al. (2004). Variables influencing the distribution pattern of web-building spiders. — The influence of the temperature range and the average temperature on the diversity and abundance of web¬ building spiders indicate that both these environmental variables mainly drive spider distribution patterns. Although Chaladze et al. (2014) and Kwon et al. (2014) showed influence of temperature on spiders, those studies did not examine small variations in temperature parameters between sites as in the present study. The response of web-building spiders to small variations in average temperature (26.2-27.3 °C) along the edge gradients observed here suggests the significant impor¬ tance of temperature for determining spider distribution. In the present study, even though there is a small temperature range (5. 7-8. 8 °C) along the edge gradients, this is the most important variable positively driving distribution patterns of spider diversity and total abundance. In contrast to our results, Coyle (1981) reported that a wider range of temperatures decreased the diversity and the abundance of web-builders in clear-felled temperate areas. In the present study, the maximum temperature range was 22.5-37.0 °C, and the daily range was typically 8.8 °C in the rubber plantations, which may not be too extreme for spiders. It is possible that the canopy of the rubber plantations alleviates the effect of maximum temperature compared with the clear-felled areas. Based on our results, we postulate that web-building spiders prefer a wider range of temperature within the range of suitable temperatures. A wider temperature range would support greater diversity and abundance. Different species may require different temperature optima for various essential activities, i.e., web building, prey capture, egg hatching, molting, development (Prestwich 1977; Li & Jackson 1996). Also, different species of spiders need appropriate ranges of ambient temperature to reach and maintain their favorable body temperatures (Krakauer 1972). The longer the activity, the more prey can s c (9 E I E ■a Q. W Dry twig density Figure 8. — Plots of the impacts of average temperature (A), temperature range (B), seedlings (C), and dry twigs (D), on the total abundance of web-building spiders of the top models. The solid lines are mean predicted values and the dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals. PETCHARAD ET AL.— FACTORS DRIVING EDGE EFFECTS IN SPIDERS 191 Average temperature Temperature range Figure 9. — Plots of the impacts of average temperature (A), temperature range (B), seedlings (C), and dry twigs (D), on the species diversity of web-building spiders of the top models. The solid lines are mean predicted values, and the dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals. be captured and the more food is consumed; this contributes to early production of offspring and increased fecundity (Logan et al. 2006). Additionally, temperature affects silk properties (Yang et al. 2005). Certain spider species need specific temperatures to produce the best quality web, which is associated with the efficiency of prey capture (Barghusen et al. 1997). Previous research suggests that temperature is a significant factor driving distribution patterns of web-building spiders at a local scale (Finch et al. 2008), and our study suggests temperature may also be important on a very fine, microsite scale. Only density of seedlings and dry twigs positively influenced the distribution patterns of spiders. The positive association with particular characteristics of the understory and spider diversity and total spider abundance is similar to Grill et al. (2005) and Blamires et al. (2007). Notably, the influence of twig density on the patterns also agrees with Gillespie (1987). The present study specifically indicates influence of seedling density on these patterns for the first time. Dry twigs and seedlings here could provide reliable architectural supports for various sizes and types of webs of most spiders (Miyashita et al. 2004) and proper refuges for spiders against their predators such as lizards (Hoffmaster 1982). Edge effect penetration. — The edge effect between the rubber plantation and the forest was found up to 50 m into the forest during the heavy rain period, and up to 100 m during the light rain period. Thus, the penetration of the edge effect in the light rain period was deeper into the forest than in the heavy rain period. A key variable driving the patterns appeared to be the temperature; this could explain the edge effect being stronger during the dry season (Pohlman et al. 2009). Obvious changes in diversity and total abundance of web-building spiders across very short edge gradients in our study as compared with those found in beetle communities suggested that web-building spider assemblages could also be an efficient bioindicator of edge effects, especially on a small spatial scale (Ewers & Didham 2008). Conservation implications. — Certain dominant species were abundant in the forest while others were abundant in the edge or rubber plantations. These patterns suggest that every position along the edge gradients is crucial for harboring particular species of web-building spiders. High diversity and total abundance of web-building spiders in rubber plantations compared to forest in the present study are the result of edge effects, and further study on such patterns in rubber plantation farther from forest is recommended. Since increased seedling and dry twig density in rubber plantations supports higher spider diversity, less disturbance to the understory could reduce losses of spider diversity (Beukuma et al. 2007). Generally, for rubber plantations, most farmers frequently clear the understory with herbicides or mechanical cutting. However, a few farmers, who practice agroforest rubber plantation, leave the understory undisturbed and plant more forest tree seedlings. It would be particularly informative to assess spider diversity between these different practices of rubber plantations. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was mainly funded by the Development and Promotion of Science and Technology Talented Project (DPST), under the Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST), Thailand. It was also financially supported by the Graduate School of Prince of Songkla University. We are very grateful to Yutaka Osada, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The 192 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY University of Tokyo, Japan, for his valuable statistical advice, critical reading of the manuscript, and invaluable comments. We are deeply indebted to Dr. Akio Tanikawa, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Japan, for help in spider identification, and for being a great teacher of taxonomy to the first author. We thank Ratana Tongyoi, SOUTHGIST, Prince of Songkla University, for providing detailed maps of study area. We thank the head of Khuan Khao Wang National Park and the owners of the rubber plantations for their permissions and support of data collection. We thank the staff of Khuan Khao Wang Forest Park for their support of the forest survey in the beginning of this research. For English editing of our first draft manuscript, we would like to express several thanks to Assoc. Prof. Dr. Seppo Karrilla, Faculty of Science and Industrial Technology, Research and Development Office (RDO), Prince of Songkla University, Thailand. For English editing of our revised manuscript, we are genuinely grateful to Prof. Paul Racey, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom, and Prof. Doug Armstrong, Massey University, New Zealand. LITERATURE CITED Albrecht, M., B, Schmid, M.K. Obrist, B. Schiipbach, D. Kleijn & P. Duelli. 2010. Effects of ecological composition meadows on arthropod diversity in adjacent intensively managed grassland. Biological Conservation 143:642-649. Baldissera, R., E. Bach, R.P. de Lima, A. Menegassi, A.R. Piovesan & G.C. da Fonseca. 2008. Distribution of understory web building spiders along an interface area of Araucaria forest and Finns plantation in southern Brazil. Neotropical Biology and Conserva¬ tion 3:3-8. Baldissera, R., G. Ganade & S.B. Fontoura 2004. Web spider community response along an edge between pasture and Araucaria forest. Biological Conservation 118:403-409. Barghusen, L.E., D.L. Claussen, M.S. Anderson & A.J. Bailer. 1997. The effects of temperature on the web-building behaviour of the common house spider, Achaearanea tepidariorum. Functional Ecology 1 1 :4-10. Barton, K. 2012. Package “MuMIn: multi-model inference” for R, R package version 1.9.5. Online at http://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=MuMIn/ Beukema, H., F. Danielsen, G. Vincent, S. Hardiwinoto & J. van Andel. 2007. Plant and bird diversity in rubber agroforests in the lowlands of Sumatra, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems 70:217-242. Bjornstad, O.N. 2015. Spatial nonparametric covariance functions. R package version 1.1-6. Online at http://CRAN.R-project.org/web/ packages/ncf/ncf.pdf Blamires, S.J., M.B. Thompson & D.F. Hochuli. 2007. Habitat selection and web plasticity by the orb spider Argiope keyserlingi (Argiopidae): do they compromise foraging success for predator avoidance? Austral Ecology 32:551-563. Bogyo, D., T. Magura, D.D. Nagy & B. Tothmeresz. 2015. Distribution of millipedes (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) along a forest interior-forest edge-grassland habitat complex. Zookeys 510:181- 195. Borror, D.J., C.A. Triplehorn & N.F. Johnson. 1989. An Introduc¬ tion to the Study of Insects. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia. Burnham, K.P. & D.R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Ap¬ proach. Springer, New York. Cabin, R.J. & R.J. Mitchell. 2000. To Bonferroni or not to Bonferroni: when and how are the questions. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 81:246-248. Cadenasso, M.L., S.T.A. Pickett, K.C. Weathers & C.G. Jones. 2003. A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries. BioScience 53:750-758. Chaladze, G., S. Otto & S. Tramp. 2014. A spider diversity model for the Caucasus Ecoregion. Journal of Insect Conservation 18:407- 416. Coyle, F. A. 1981. Effects of clearcutting on the spider community of a Southern Appalachian forest. Journal of Arachnology 9:285-298. Downie, l.S., J.C. Coulson & J.E.L. Butterfield. 1996. Distribution and dynamics of surface-dwelling spiders across a pasture- plantation ecotone. Ecography 19:29-40. Ending, W., M.H. Schmidt, S. Bacher, R. Brandi & W. Nentwig. 2007. Niche properties of Central European spiders: shading, moisture and the evolution of the habitat niche. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16:440-448. Ewers, R.M. & R.K. Didham. 2008. Pervasive impact of large-scale edge effects on a beetle community. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:5426- 5429. Finch, O.-D., T. Blick & A. Schuldt. 2008. Macroecological patterns of spider species richness across Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation 17:2849-2868. Galle, R. & B. Feher. 2006. Edge effect on spider assemblages. Tiscia 35:37-40. Gillespie, R.G. 1987. The mechanism of habitat selection in the long- jawed orb-weaving spider Tetragnatha elongata (Araneae, Tetrag- nathidae). Journal of Arachnology 15:81-90. Grill, A., B. Knoflach, D.F.R. Cleary & V. Kati. 2005. Butterfly, spider, and plant communities in different land-use types in Sardina, Italy. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:1281-1300. Halaj, J., D.W. Ross & A.R. Moldenke. 2000. Importance of habitat structure to the arthropod food-web in Douglas-fir canopies. Oikos 90:139-152. Hoffmaster, D.K. 1982. Predator avoidance behaviors of five species of Panamanian orb-weaving spiders (Araneae, Araneidae, Ulobor- idae). Journal of Arachnology 10:69-73. Jabin, M., D. Mohr, H. Kappes & W. Topp. 2004. Influence of deadwood on density of soil macro-arthropods in a managed oak- beech forest. Forest Ecology and Management 194:61-69. Jackman, S. 2012. pscl: Classes and methods for r developed in the political science computational laboratory, Stanford University. Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California. R package version 1.04.4. Online at http://pscl. stanford.edu/ James, F.C. & H.H. Shugart. 1970. A quantitative method of habitat description. Audubon Field Notes 24:727-736. Krakauer, T. 1972. Thermal response of the orb-weaving spider, Nephila clavipes (Araneae: Argiopidae). American Midland Nat¬ uralist 88:245-250. Kwon, T.S., C.M. Lee, T.W. Kim, S.S. Kim & J.H. Sung. 2014. Prediction of abundance of forest spiders according to climate warming in South Korea. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 7:el33-el55. Lacasella, F. & M. Zapparoli. 2015. Effects of grasslands and conifer reforestations on centipedes (Chilopoda): barriers semi-permeable matrices or secondary habitats? Insect Conservation and Diversity 8:525-537. Lessard, J.P., T.E. Sackett, W.N. Reynolds, D.A. Fowler & N.J. Sanders. 2010. Determinants of the detrital arthropod community structure: the effects of temperature and resources along an environmental gradient. Oikos 120:333-343. Li, D. & R.R. Jackson. 1996. How temperature affects development and reproduction in spiders: a review. Journal of Thermal Biology 21:245-274. PETCHARAD ET AL — FACTORS DRIVING EDGE EFFECTS IN SPIDERS 193 Li, H.M., T.M. Aide, Y.X. Ma, W.J. Liu & M. Cao. 2007. Demand for rubber is causing the loss of high diversity rain forest in SW China. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:1731-1745. Logan, D.J., W. Wolesensky & A. Joern. 2006. Temperature- dependent phenology and predation in arthropod systems. Ecological Modelling 196:471^82. Lumsden, L.F. & A.F. Bennett. 2005. Scattered trees in rural landscapes: foraging habitat for insectivorous bats in South Eastern Australia. Biological Conservation 122:205-222. Magguran, A.E. & B.J. McGill. 2011. Biological Diversity: Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment. Oxford University Press, New York. Malumbres-Olarte, J., C.J. Vink, J.G. Ross, R.H. Cruickshank & A.M. Paterson. 2013. The role of habitat complexity on spider communities in native alpine grasslands of New Zealand. Insect Conservation and Diversity 6:124-134. Martin, T.G., B.A. Wintle, J.R. Rhodes, P.M. Kuhnert, S.A. Field, S.J. Low-Choy, et al. 2005. Zero tolerance ecology: improving ecological inference by modeling the source of zero observations. Ecology Letters 8:1235-1246. McCoy, E.D. & S.S. Bell. 1991. Habitat structure: the evolution and diversification of a complex topic. Pp. 3-27. In Habitat Structure: the Physical Arrangements of Objects in Space. (S.S. Bell, E.D. McCoy, H.R. Mushinky, eds.). Chapman and Hall, London. Miyashita, T., A. Shinkai & T. Chida. 1998. The effects of forest fragmentation on web spider communities in urban areas. Biological Conservation 86:357-364. Miyashita, T., M. Takada & A. Shimazaki. 2004. Indirect effects of herbivory by deer reduce abundance and species richness of web spiders. Ecoscience 11:74-79. Mohr, E.C.J. 1944. The Soils of Equatorial Regions with Special Reference to the Netherlands East Indies. Edwards Brothers Malloy, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Oksanen, J. 2015. Vegan: ecological diversity. R package version 2.3- 0. Online at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/ vignettes/diversity- vegan. pdf Pearce, J.L., L.A. Venier, G. Eccles, J. Pedlar & D. MCKenney. 2005. Habitat islands, forest edge and spring-active invertebrate assem¬ blages. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:2949-2969. Pilosof, S., C.W. Dick, C. Korine, B.D. Patterson & B.R. Krasnov. 2012. Effects of anthropogenic disturbance and climate on patterns of bat fly parasitism. PLoS ONE 7(7):e4I487. Platnick, N.I. 2014. The World Spider Catalog, Version 14.5. American Museum of Natural History, New York. Online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/ catalog/index. html/ Pohlman, C.L., S.M. Turton & M. Goosem. 2009. Temporal variation in microclimatic edge effects near powerlines, highways and streams in Australian tropical rainforest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 149:84-95. Prestwich, K.N. 1977. The energetics of web-building in spiders. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 57:321-326. Quinn, G.P. & M.J. Keough. 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. " " R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, v. 3.1.0. Vienna, Austria. Online at http://www.r-project.org/ Ries, L., R.J. Fletcher, J. Battin & T.D. Sisk. 2004. Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 35:491-522. Rodrigues, E.N.L., M.D.S. Mendonga Jr. & L.E. Costa-Schmidt. 2014. Spider diversity responds strongly to edge effects but weakly to vegetation structure in riparian forests of Southern Brazil. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 8:123-133. Rykken, J.J., P.C. Jepson & A.R. Moldenke. 2011. Ground-dwelling arthropod distribution and movement across a fragmented riparian forest. Northwest Science 85:527-541. Sattler, T., D. Borcard, R. Arlettaz, F. Bontadina, P. Legendre, M.K. Obrist, et al. 2010. Spider, bee, and bird communities in cities are shaped by environmental control and high stochasticity. Ecology 91:3343-3353. Spiller, D.A. & T.W. Schoener. 1998. Lizards reduce spider species richness by excluding rare species. Ecology 79:503-516. Tanikawa, A. 2012. Further notes on the spiders of the genus Dolomedes (Araneae: Pisauridae) from Japan. Acta Arachnologica 61:11-17. Vandergast, A.G. & R.G. Gillespie. 2004. Effects of natural forest fragmentation on a Hawaiian spider community. Environmental Entomology 33:1296-1305. Yang, Y., X. Chen, Z. Shao, P. Zhou, D. Porter, D.P. Knight, et al. 2005. Toughness of spider silk at high and low temperatures. Advanced Materials 17:84-88. Zhai, D.L., C.H. Cannon, J.W. Slik, C.P. Zhang & Z.C. Dai. 2012. Rubber and pulp plantations represent a double threat to Hainan's natural tropical forests. Journal of Environmental Management 96:64-73. Zuur, A.F., E.N. leno, N.J. Walker, A. A. Saveliev & G.M. Smith. 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York. Manuscript received 2 April 2015, revised 29 March 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:194-198 First record of a representative of Ballarrinae (Opiliones: Neopilionidae), Americovibone remota sp. nov., from New Zealand Christopher K. Taylor: Department of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia; School of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. E-mail: Chris.Taylor@curtin.edu.au Abstract. Americovibone remota sp. nov. is described as the first New Zealand representative of the Ballarrinae, a Gondwanan-distributed group of harvestmen (Arachnida: Opiliones: Palpatores), from a female collected at Dart Hut in Mount Aspiring National Park. Though closely allied by external and ovipositor morphology to Americovibone kmfrcmcoae Hunt & Cokendolpher, 1991 of southern South America, A. remota lacks the reflexed pedipalpal tibia previously regarded as characteristic of the Ballarrinae. The genus Americovibone is restricted to austral Nothofagus forests which have a similar trans-Pacific distribution. Keywords: Arachnida, Palpatores, taxonomy, biogeography, Gondwana http://zoobank.org/References/EEE95A2C-9951-4EF3-B7D7-82EA70A09671 The Ballarrinae are a highly distinctive but little-studied group of long-legged harvestmen (Opiliones: Palpatores) found in continents of the Southern Hemisphere. They are immediately recognizable from their distinctive pedipalps, which have an elongate patella, reduced tibia and lack a tarsal claw (Hunt & Cokendolpher 1991). They are also noteworthy for including some of the smallest of all Opiliones, with body lengths less than 1.5 mm in some species (Hunt & Cokendol¬ pher 1991). When first described by Hunt & Cokendolpher (1991), the Ballarrinae exhibited a near-classic Gondwanan distribution, with species found in southern parts of each of South America, Africa and Australia. However, they have hitherto appeared to be curiously absent from New Zealand. Other Gondwanan- distributed groups of Opiliones, such as Pettalidae (Boyer & Giribet 2009), Triaenonychidae (Forster 1954) and Enantio- buninae (Taylor 2011; Fernandez et al. 2014), are diverse in the region and make up the greater part of the local Opiliones fauna. Recently, while sorting through material on loan from the New Zealand Arthropod Collection (NZAC), I discovered a specimen of Ballarrinae in a collection from the Dart Hut in New Zealand’s Mount Aspiring National Park. Though only a single female specimen was available, this represents a significant development in our understanding of the New Zealand harvestman fauna. The New Zealand specimen is very similar to the southern Chilean species Americovibone lanfrancoae Hunt &. Cokendol¬ pher, 1991 and is here described as a second species of the same genus. This implies a closer relationship of the New Zealand Ballarrinae to South America than to the Australian genera Plesioballarra Hunt & Cokendolpher, 1991, Arrallaba Hunt & Cokendolpher, 1991 and Ballarra Hunt & Cokendol¬ pher, 1991. The specimen was sourced from the New Zealand Arthro¬ pod Collection (NZAC), Landcare Research, Auckland. It was examined using a Nikon SMZ1500 stereo microscope, and photographs and measurements were taken using the NIS- Elements D 4.00.03 program. The ovipositor was removed and partially cleared using 50% lactic acid, and the ovipositor, a separated chelicera, and the original specimen were examined using a Leica DM2500 compound microscope. The ovipositor and separated chelicera were retained in a microvial with the original specimen. Coloration is described as preserved in alcohol. Measurements are reported in millimeters (mm). Family Neopilionidae Lawrence, 1931 Subfamily Ballarrinae Hunt & Cokendolpher, 1991 Genus Americovibone Hunt & Cokendolpher, 1991 Americovibone Hunt & Cokendolpher, 1991: 165. Type species. — Americovibone lanfrancoae Hunt & Coken¬ dolpher, 1991, by original designation. Remarks. — Americovibone remota sp. nov. is consistent with the description of Americovibone provided by Hunt & Cokendolpher (1991). Important diagnostic features of this genus include: chelicera with ventral spur at base of segment I; pedipalp with patella longer than tibia and tarsus, femur and patella of female pedipalp pseudosegmented; leg claws with lateral teeth; ovipositor corpus with more than two segments, two spermathecae present. Americovibone remota also has a spermathecal morphology very similar to those of A. lanfrancoae. Americovibone remota sp. nov. (Fig. 1) http://zoobank.org/NomenclaturalActs/ F6D622B7-A474-4553-BE09-683D85C12E2D Type material. — Holotype female. NEW ZEALAND: Dart Hut, Mount Aspiring National Park, 44°32'S 168°33'E, 920 m, 13-14 February 1980, J. S. Dugdale, pan trap in bush (NZAC). Etymology. — From the Latin remotus, remote, in reference to both the remoteness of the type locality in New Zealand, and the species’ remoteness from its closest ally in South America. Diagnosis. — Americovibone remota differs from A. lanfran¬ coae in having the pedipalpal tibia not reflexed on the patella. 194 Figure 1. — Americovibone remotci sp. nov., holotype female. A. Body, dorsal view; B. Body, lateral view; C. Right pedipalp, lateral view, setae omitted; D. Ovipositor, showing position of spermathecae as dotted lines; E. Photograph of spermatheca; F. Line diagram of spermatheca. with the dorsal angle between the two segments greater than 180°. As in other Phalangioidea, the patella-tibia junction of the pedipalp in Ballarrinae is able to flex laterally but not dorsoventrally (Wolff et ah, in press), so the difference in palpal disposition between the two species is not an artefact of preservation. The two species may also differ in color pattern, with A. lanfrancoae illustrated by Hunt & Cokendolpher (1991) as having the propodeum medially brown, and the 196 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY dorsum of its opisthosoma more extensively pale with the brown transverse striping broken medially. However, this should be treated with caution due to the reported poor condition of the A. lanfrancoae type specimens. Comparison of body size between A. remota and A. lanfrancoae is also impeded by the condition of the single known female specimen of the latter, in which the main body is distorted and the legs missing (Hunt & Cokendolpher 1991). However, differences between cheliceral and pedipalpal measurements of the two species are minimal except that the pedipalpal femur and tarsus are relatively longer in A. lanfrancoae (1.97 and 0.98 mm, respectively; patella 1.4X length of tarsus in A. lanfrancoae vs 1.6X in A. remota). Description (female holotype). — Prosoma length 0.29, pro¬ soma width 0.73, body length 1.18. Dorsum unarmed, without prominent setae. Ozopores small, round, not raised on lobes. Propodeum cream-colored; ocularium black. Mesopeltidium, metapeltidium and dorsum of opisthosoma mostly mottled brown, with cream-colored transverse stripes and cream-colored lateral margins on opisthosoma. Venter cream-colored, without prominent setae; coxapophysis II angled slightly rearwards. Chelicerae: Segment I 0.25, segment II 0.46. Unarmed. Base of segment I with ventral spur; spinose scales absent. Fingers relatively slender, bent mesad in frontal view; teeth all small. Pedipcdps (Fig. IC): Femur 1.89, patella 1.34, tibia 0.59, tarsus 0.84. Femur more than 1.5 times main body length, with ten pseudosegments. Patella more than two times length of tibia, with eight pseudosegments whose boundaries are concentrated towards midlength; patella with small swelling retrodistally. Tibia not reflexed relative to patella; dorsal angle between patella and tibia slightly more than 180°. Tarsus evenly concave on dorsal margin. Sparse plumose setae along entire length of pedipalp, becoming denser distally on tarsus; plumes restricted to one side of each seta, reaching about halfway down length of each seta on femur to tibia, extending further down each seta on tarsus. Few non-plumose setae present at apex of tarsus. Tarsal claw and microtrichia absent. Legs: Leg I femur 1.57, patella 0.33, tibia 1.38; leg II femur 2.96, patella 0.34, tibia 2.92; leg III femur 1.58, patella 0.31, tibia 1.41; leg IV femur 2.40, patella 0.36, tibia 2.32. All segments unarmed. Femora of all legs with, respectively, 6, 12, 4-5 and 7-8 pseudosegments; tibia II with 12 pseudosegments, tibia IV with 3 pseudosegments, tibiae I and III not pseudoseg- mented. Metatarsi elongate but not pseudosegmented. Tarsal claws of legs I, III and IV with sharp bend near base; dentate lateral carina present on either side; tarsal claw of leg II weaker, without lateral carina. Ovipositor (Fig. ID-F); Furca three-segmented, distal segment of furca elongate (about four times as long as wide). Two spermathecae present in second and third segments; spermathecae consisting of short loop with lateral extension on each side. Remarks. — As the new species described herein is more similar to A. lanfrancoae than any other species of Ballarrinae, it is provisionally assigned to the same genus pending the discovery of male specimens. It might be questioned whether it is appropriate to describe a new species of Opiliones from a single female specimen, considering the pre-eminent position of male genitalic characters in Opiliones taxonomy (see e.g., Maci'as-Ordonez et al. 2010; Perez-Gonzalez 2011; Pinto-da- Rocha et al. 2012), the presence in many groups of Opiliones of significant sexual dimorphism, and the potential difficulty of distinguishing females of closely related species (see e.g., Taylor 2004). However, this particular example represents the first record in New Zealand of a significant group of Opiliones whose presence there has not hitherto been recognized. Many parts of the south-western South Island of New Zealand are of limited accessibility, and so have not been extensively collected. The type locality of A. remota. Dart Hut, is positioned in the eastern part of Mount Aspiring National Park at the junction of Snowy Creek and the Dart River (Fig. 2). Dart Hut is two days’ walk from the nearest road, with the entire Rees-Dart track taking four or five days (Department of Conservation 2013). Significant sexual dimorphism has not yet been recorded from Ballarrinae, though males are generally smaller than females (Hunt & Cokendolpher 1991). The main external differences between A. lanfrancoae males and females are that male pedipalps lack the pseudosegments found in females, and the male pedipalpal tarsus is dorsally convex rather than concave. Hunt & Cokendolpher (1991) did not identify any significant differences between the sexes in coloration, ornamentation or cheliceral development. As noted above, the close similarity of A. remota to A. lanfrancoae suggests a closer relationship of New Zealand Ballarrinae to South American than to Australian species. Though less common than the converse, other examples of this pattern of biogeographic relationships include the plant genus Aristotelia (Elaeocarpaceae) and certain members of the midge subfamily Podonominae (Diptera: Chironomidae) (Crisci et al. 1991). However, it is also noteworthy that Dart Hut is positioned in a beech (Nothofagus) forest (map in Sommerville et al. 1982), which is also the known habitat for the South American species (Hunt & Cokendolpher 1991). Nothofagus has only a relictual distribution in mainland Australia, being found in Tasmania, southern Victoria and across the New South Wales-Queensland border (Knapp et al. 2005). Where habitat has been recorded, Australian Ballarrinae are mostly known from Eucalyptus woodlands, though Ballarra cantrelli Hunt & Cokendolpher, 1991 and Plesiohallarra crinis Hunt & Cokendolpher, 1991 are possibly within the range of Nothofagus moorei (Hunt & Cokendol¬ pher 1991). No Ballarrinae have as yet been described from Tasmania. It is also possible that local extinctions have complicated the biogeography of Ballarrinae. The endemic New Zealand bat genus Mystacina is more closely related to South American taxa in the Noctilionoidea than to any living Australian bats (Teeling et al. 2005). Nevertheless, the fossil record supports an Australian origin for Mystacina, with its probable sister genus Icarops being present in the Miocene of northern Australia (Hand et al. 1998). Though the Ballarrinae were initially united on the basis of their distinctive pedipalpal morphology (Hunt & Cokendol¬ pher 1991), a recent molecular analysis of Palpatores has questioned the monophyly of ballarrines (Groh & Giribet 2015). In this study, the South African Vibone vetusta Kauri, 1961 failed to form a clade with the Australian Ballarra longipalpus Hunt 8l Cokendolpher, 1991. Conversely, B. longipalpus and the South American A. lanfrancoae did form TAYLOR— NEW ZEALAND BALLARRINAE 197 Figure 2. — Map of Southern Hemisphere, showing distribution of Ballarrinae and Nothofagus. Symbols indicating known localities of main Ballarrinae subgroups (Hunt & Cokendolpher 1991): = Americo\’ih(me\ diamond^ Vibone\ triangle = Australian clade {Ballarra, Aircillaha and Plesiohallarra). Distribution of Nothofagus shown in grey (based on Knapp et cil. 2005, modified for scale). Inset: southern South Island, New Zealand, with black square indicating type locality of Americovibone remota. a clade when included in a morphological analysis of Neopilionidae by Taylor (2013). However, neither of these analyses included more than two species of Ballarrinae nor had the Ballarrinae as their main focus. The Australian Ballarrinae are united by their distinctive male genital morphology, with a barbed process on the left ventral side of the penis (Hunt & Cokendolpher 1991). This process is absent in A. lanfrancoae. The male of V. vetiista is unfortunately unknown but it is noteworthy that the ovipositor morphology of this species, as described by Kauri (1961), is unique in the Phalangioidea, with the main body of the ovipositor largely unsegmented. The absence of a dorsal reflexion between the patella and tibia of the pedipalp in A. remota, previously regarded as a defining feature of the Ballarrinae, gives credence to the possibility that the unusual ballarrine palpal morphology may have evolved independently. Glandular setae on harvestmen pedipalps produce sticky secretions that are used in prey capture (Wolff et al. 2014), and it is possible that the ‘ballarrine’ pedipalp represents a convergent adaption to the active predation of fast-moving prey such as springtails. Further investigation into the monophyly of this group is required. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Grace Hall of Landcare Research for the loan of specimens from the New Zealand Arthropod Collection. Research for this paper was conducted using facilities at Curtin University, Western Australia, and the University of Western Australia. Comments and suggestions for the original manuscript were provided by Mark Harvey and two anonymous reviewers. The maps used in Fig. 2 were modified from freely available figures at Wikimedia Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org). LITERATURE CITED Boyer, S.L. & G. Giribet. 2009. Welcome back New Zealand: regional biogeography and Gondwanan origin of three endemic genera of 198 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY mite harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi). Journal of Biogeography 36:1084-1099. Crisci, J.V., M.M. Cigliano, J.J. Morrone & S. Roig-Junent. 1991. Historical biogeography of southern South America. Systematic Zoology 40:152-171. Department of Conservation. 2013. The Rees-Dart Track (brochure). Accessed 20 January 2016. Online at http://www.doc.govt.nz/ Documents/parks-and-recreation/tracks-and-walks/otago/ rees-dart-track-brochure.pdf Fernandez, R., S. Velez & G. Giribet. 2014. Linking genetic diversity and morphological disparity: biodiversity assessment of a highly unexplored family of harvestmen (Arachnida : Opiliones : Neo- pilionidae) in New Zealand. Invertebrate Systematics 28:590-604. Forster, R.R. 1954. The New Zealand harvestmen (sub-order Laniatores). Canterbury Museum Bulletin 2:1-329. Groh, S. & G. Giribet. 2015. Polyphyly of Caddoidea, reinstatement of the family Acropsopilionidae in Dyspnoi, and a revised classification system of Palpatores (Arachnida, Opiliones). Cladis- tics 31:277-290. Hand, S.J., P. Murray, D. Megirian, M. Archer & H. Godthelp. 1998. Mystacinid bats (Microchiroptera) from the Australian Tertiary. Journal of Paleontology 72:538-545. Hunt, G.S. & J.C. Cokendolpher. 1991. Ballarrinae, a new subfamily of harvestmen from the Southern Hemisphere (Arachnida, Opiliones, Neopilionidae). Records of the Australian Museum 43:131-169. Kauri, H. 1961. Opiliones. Pp. 9-197. In South African Animal Life: Results of the Lund University Expedition in 1950-1951, vol. 8. (B. Hanstrom, P. Brinck & G. Rudebeck, eds.). Almqvist 8l Wiksell, Uppsala. Knapp, M., K. Stockier, D. Havell, F. Delsuc, F. Sebastian! P.J. Lockhart. 2005. Relaxed molecular clock provides evidence for long-distance dispersal of Nothofagus (southern beech). PLoS Biology 3:el4. doi:10. 1371/journal. pbio. 0030014. Lawrence, R.F. 1931. The harvest-spiders (Opiliones) of South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum 29:341-508. Macias-Orddnez, R., G. Machado, A. Perez-Gonzalez & J. W. Shultz. 2010. Genitalic evolution in Opiliones. Pp. 285-306. In The Evolution of Primary Sexual Characters in Animals. (J.L. Leonard & A. Cordoba-Aguilar, eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford. Perez-Gonzalez, A. 2011. New familial assignment for two harvest- men species of the infraorder Grassatores (Arachnida: Opiliones: Laniatores). Zootaxa 2757:24-28. Pinto-da-Rocha, R., A.R. Benedetti, E.G. de Vasconcelos & M.R. Hara. 2012. New systematic assignments in Gonyleptoidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores). Zookeys 198:25-68. Sommerville, P., A.F. Mark & J.B. Wilson. 1982. Plant succession on moraines of the upper Dart Valley, southern South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 20:227-244. Taylor, C.K. 2004. New Zealand harvestmen of the subfamily Megalopsalidinae (Opiliones: Monoscutidae) — the genus Pantop- scilis. Tuhinga 15:53-76. Taylor, C.K. 2011. Revision of the genus Megalopsalis (Arachnida: Opiliones: Phalangioidea) in Australia and New Zealand and implications for phalangioid classification. Zootaxa 2773:1-65. Taylor, C.K. 2013. Further notes on New Zealand Enantiobuninae (Opiliones, Neopilionidae), with the description of a new genus and two new species. ZooKeys 263:59-73. Teeling, E.C., M.S. Springer, O. Madsen, P. Bates, S.J. O’Brien & W.J. Murphy. 2005. A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science 307:580-584. Wolff, J.O., A.L. Schbnhofer, J. Martens, H. Wijnhoven, C.K. Taylor & S.N. Gorb. In press. The evolution of pedipalps and glandular hairs as predatory devices in harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. Wolff, J.O., A.L. Schonhofer, C.F. Schaber & S. N. Gorb. 2014. Gluing the ‘unwettable’: soil-dwelling harvestment use viscoelastic fluids for capturing springtails. Journal of Experimental Biology 217:3535-3544. Manuscript received 14 September 2015, revised 15 February 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:199-209 Mechanical properties of male genitalia in Leiobumim harvestmen (Opiliones: Sclerosomatidae) Mercedes Burns’'^ and Jeffrey W. Shultz^- 'Department of Entomology and BEES Graduate Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; “Present address: Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182. Email: mercedes.burns@gmail.com Abstract. The morphology of arthropod intromittent organs evolves rapidly and is often species specific, phenomena widely attributed to sexual selection. Similar patterns in biomechanical properties may also exist, but practical challenges in manipulating small structures and measuring minute forces has impeded experimental biomechanical analysis. Here we describe a device that displaces a small structure while measuring its resistance, and use it to examine the biomechanics of penile flexure in the eastern North American harvestman genus Leiolmnum C.L. Koch, 1839. Several Leiobunum lineages have lost primitive penis-associated nuptial-gift sacs and have gained apparent female pregenital barriers, a co¬ evolutionary pattern consistent with shifts from precopulatory enticement to more-antagonistic strategies. We tested for an association between losses of nuptial-gift sacs and increases in penile flexural resistance using five sacculate and five non- sacculate species. We measured three mechanical variables — resistance force, elastic efficiency and viscoelastic relaxation time — under lateral, dorsal, and ventral flexion. Our functional assumptions about sacculate and non-sacculate penes anticipated two biomechanically-defined species clusters, but three were found: a diverse sacculate group, a monophyletic non-sacculate group and an unanticipated mixed group. This work demonstrates that experimental genital biomechanics in arthropods is possible, and we discuss the functional implications of our results. Keywords: Reproduction, viscoelasticity, elastic efficiency, phylogenetic comparative methods Explaining the remarkable diversity of reproductive struc¬ tures in arthropods and other animals is a perennial goal of evolutionary biologists (Day & Young 2004; Leonard & Cordoba-Aguilar 2010). Attention has centered on the often species-specific and sometimes exaggerated or complex traits of males (Hosken & Stockley 2004), although several recent authors have highlighted the importance of genital variation in females as well (Brennan et al. 2007; Sanchez et al. 2011; Tanabe & Sota 2013; Ah-King et al. 2014). The persistent bias toward research on male structures, especially intromittent organs, likely reflects their proven value for delimiting species (Edwards & Knowles 2014), their relatively rapid rate of evolution (Cayetano et al. 2011; Cassidy et al. 2014; Masly & Kamimura 2014), and the numerous evolutionary factors that have been invoked to explain their diversity (Leonard & Cordoba-Aguilar 2010), including female preference (Kokko et al. 2003), sperm competition (Parker et al. 2013), and cryptic female choice (Eberhard 1996; Albo et al. 2013). An understanding of the contributions that different selection mechanisms have made in shaping genitalic diversity should benefit from detailed information about the mechanical properties of genitalia (Cayetano et al. 2011), but existing information is largely based on inferences drawn from static anatomy or associated behavior rather than from experimen¬ tal measurement of biomechanical variables (Bonduriansky & Day 2003; Marquez & Knowles 2007). Consequently, despite active interest in the roles of female enticement and coercion as male mating strategies, there is little information about the intrinsic ability of male intromittent organs to respond mechanically to female movement or to overcome female resistance during antagonistic interactions (but see Brennan et al. 2010). Here we focus on the mechanical properties of penes in the eastern North American species of harvestmen from the genus Leiobunum C.L. Koch, 1839 (Fig. 1), a clade for which reproductive diversity is increasingly well documented (Burns et al. 2012, 2013; Fowler-Finn et al. 2014; Burns & Shultz 2015). Harvestmen are unusual among arachnids in having a true penis and in mating face to face (Machado et al. 2015; Fig. 1). The reproductive structures in both sexes are enclosed within a pregenital chamber that occupies the ventral part of the abdomen and opens anteriorly just posterior to the mouth. This chamber is enclosed ventrally by a large sclerite, the genital operculum, which articulates with the abdomen posteriorly via a transverse hinge to open and close like a trapdoor. The penis is essentially a cuticular tube that usually has a subterminal joint that divides it into a long proximal shaft and short distal glans, which has a thin terminal stylus that bears the small primary genital opening. The glans-shaft joint is operated by a bi- or multi-pinnate muscle that arises from the walls of the shaft and inserts via a long tendon on the ventral surface of the joint. The penis is externalized anteriorly by the combined effects of protractor muscles and hydraulic eversion of the flexible walls of the pregenital chamber. Two basic types of penes have been distinguished based on the presence or absence of a subterminal pair of cuticular sacs (Fig. lA). The sacs carry a male-generated nuptial gift that may be accessed orally by the female early in mating (Fig. 1 D), a behavior that was often confused with copulation by early naturalists due to the proximity of the mouth and pregenital opening. Penile sacs were lost several times in Leiobunum (Burns et al. 2013); losses typically accompanied by the evolution of a sclerotized pregenital barrier in females. These correlated transformations suggest that female enticement via nuptial gifts was important in the primitive premating strategy in Leiobunum but was replaced multiple times by other mechanisms, including antagonistic interactions between the penis and the opening to the female pregenital chamber (Burns et al. 2013). Recent work indicates that the relative maximum forces produced by the penis protractor muscle and by the closer of the female genital operculum coevolved and are 199 200 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY L calcar^^Z L euserratipalpe'illizzzz L nigropalpi 5~~ L. politum cr ~ L bracchiolum i L vittatum L uxorium L aldrichi c L ventricosum^ L verrucosum<^ 1 mm Figure 1. — Male reproductive morphology and phylogeny of Leiobimwn. A. Penes (to same scale) from 10 Leiohmmm species depicted on a pruned maximum clade credibility tree (Burns et al. 2013). We hypothesized that these discrete classes should be highly correlated with genital function, such that mechanical force traits might discriminate them. B-E. Mating in Leiohimum venucosum (legs removed for clarity). B. Male encounters receptive female, male palps preparing to grasp female, penis extruded. C. Male clasps female with palps posterior to leg coxa II, delivers initial nuptial gift to female from penile sacs. D. Female feeds from male glands, penis lodged near female pregenital opening. E. Intromission associated with reorientation of bodies. BURNS & SHULTZ— GENITAL BIOMECHANICS OF OPILIONES 201 higher in non-sacculate species, suggesting that greater mechanical forces are produced and resisted in non-sacculate forms (Burns & Shultz 2015). We hypothesized that the mechanical properties of penes in Leiobunum have changed from those that accommodate female preferences to those that can transmit or resist mechanical forces when interacting with the female’s pregen¬ ital opening. Specifically, we expect penes used in forceful precopulatory interactions to resist higher bending forces than those used principally for enticing females with nuptial gifts. We also predicted changes in two parameters associated with cuticular viscoelasticity. In structures composed of ideally elastic materials, the energy used in deforming a structure is stored as elastic potential energy and recovered as kinetic energy as the penis regains its resting state, regardless of the duration or rate of loading or unloading (Vincent 2012). However, in viscoelastic materials, some energy is lost to heat during deformation, with the amount being time dependent. Thus, we also predicted that the amount and rate of energy loss would be higher in penes that are adapted to accommo¬ date female nuptial-gift feeding and lower in penes adapted for applying large or prolonged forces to the female We tested our hypotheses by bending penes from 10 Leiobunum species while measuring both flexural resistance and flexural displacement. Measurements were obtained from a phylogenetically diverse sample of five sacculate species and representatives from two non-sacculate clades, the calcar and vittatum groups (Fig. lA). We measured three biomechanical variables — maximum resistance force for a flexural displace¬ ment of 5% of beam length, the efficiency of elastic energy storage, and the rate of viscoelastic relaxation in static bending. Phylogenetic multivariate analyses of our data recovered two species clusters (the sacculate group and monophyletic calcar clade) that were consistent with our biomechanical predictions but also a third cluster that was not anticipated. Ultimately, this work demonstrates that mechan¬ ical properties of reproductive structures can be measured and that data derived from these measurements can be used to test hypotheses about arthropod mating systems. METHODS Animals. — We examined 60 male specimens representing ten Leiobunum species (Fig. lA), constituting a subset of species examined in Burns & Shultz (2015). Five species have penes with subterminal gift-bearing sacs and females that lack pregenital barriers (i.e., L. ventricosum (Wood, 1868), L. verrucosum (Wood, 1868), L. aldrichi Weed, 1893, L. politum (Weed, 1889), L. bracchiolum McGhee, 1977), which we term “sacculate species”. Five species lack gift-bearing sacs and females have sclerotized pregenital barriers (i.e., the vittatum group: L. uxorium Crosby & Bishop, 1924, L. vittatum (Say, 1821) and the calcar group: L. nigropalpi (Wood, 1868), L. euserratipalpe Ingianni, McGhee & Shultz, 2011, L. calcar (Wood, 1868)), which we term “non-sacculate species”. Specimens were collected and maintained up to a week in laboratory terraria with food (pulverized fish food) and water provided ad libitum in cotton-stoppered vials. See Table 1 for additional species information. Apparatus. — We assembled a device to measure forces associated with penile flexural resistance and flexural displace¬ ment (deflection) in fresh harvestman penes mounted as a cantilever (Fig. 2). We attached a force transducer (Aurora Scientific, Inc.: Model 404A: range, 0-100 mN; sensitivity; 10.0 mN; resolution, 2000 nN) to a vertically mounted, computer- controlled translation stage (Thor Labs: OptoDC Servo Motor Driver #001). A displacement transducer (Microstrain: SG-DVRT-4: max. linear stroke, 24 mm; resolution, 6 pm) recorded linear movement of the force transducer. The translation stage was programmed to move at 1 mm/s. A stiff, hooked, non-magnetic wire was attached to the input tube of the force transducer and used in deflecting the penis. Protocol. — Adult specimens were sacrificed by placing them in a freezer at — 20°C for 10 minutes, after which the penis was removed and affixed at its proximal end to a round glass cover slip using ethyl cyanoacrylate gel (Super Glue®). A drop of accelerant (Turbo Set I, Palm Labs Adhesives, Inc.) was applied to the glue bead to fix the penis as a full-moment cantilever (Fig. 2B). The cover slip with attached penis was submerged in a clear-sided, open-top polyacrylic box filled with room-temperature Ringer’s solution. The cover slip was affixed to the side of the box using 1/8 inch x 1/8 inch (.3175 cm X 3175 cm) neodymium magnets to facilitate repositioning (Fig. 2A). The hooked wire from the force transducer was brought into contact with the penis at a point one third of free-penis length from the distal end. This length was selected to avoid applying force to the sac region of penes from sacculate species (Fig. lA). The translation stage was programmed to bend the penis with a deflection of 5% of the beam length. Three consecutive hysteresis loops (Fig. 3A) were obtained from each penis, with the penis displaced and returned to its resting position at 1 mm/s. Hysteresis loops were obtained for dorsal, ventral and horizontal deflection from the resting position, as each of these flexural directions may be imposed by the female pregenital chamber upon the penis during precopulation. We also deflected each penis to 5% of beam length and held it for at least 180 s while measuring the viscoelastic relaxation of the restoring force (Fig. 3B). Displacement and force data were sampled every 50 ms using Easylogger Dual Version 1.0 software (EasySync Ltd.). Mechanical variables. — We calculated three mechanical variables each from dorsal, ventral and lateral flexures — force at maximum experimental displacement (or cF,,,^,.^ when corrected for body size), elastic efficiency R, and relaxation time to 90% (T^o) — resulting in a total of nine variables. Mean values for all variables were established for each specimen from three replicates, and mean species values were calculated from specimen means. F,„ax is the force required to achieve a vertical deflection of the penis equal to 5% of beam length. Consequently, F,„ax can be viewed a measure of stiffness at a geometrically similar flexural displacement across specimens. To adjust the magni¬ tude of F,„ax for body size, we derived a method of size correction from the standard equation for cantilevered beams fixed at one end (Vogel 2003): FZ)’’ = 3£/L“^ (1) and its proportional representation: [FD“'] = EIL-^ (2) 202 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1. — Taxon sampling for molecular phylogenetic reconstruction and mechanical force trait evaluation. Accession numbers are for the GenBank genetic sequence repository; numbers GQ870643-GQ870668 and GQ872152-GQ872185 are derived from Hedin et al. (2010). Column 5: penile nuptial gift sac presence, grouping variable used in testing for trait mean differences. Column 6: numbers of male specimens analyzed for mechanical force traits. Species GenBank accession numbers Molecular specimen locality Mechanical data specimen locality Penile nuptial gift sac presence Number of specimens Leiobimum alclrichi GQ870650, JQ432342, JQ432284, GQ872154, GQ870649, JQ432343, JQ432285, GQ872153, JQ432344, JQ432286, JQ432238 USA: MI: Calhoun Co. USA: MD: Frederick Co. Present 2 L. hracchiohnn JQ432330, JQ432272, JQ432230 USA: NC: Guilford Co. USA: MD: Montgomery Co. Present 2 L. calcar GQ870653, JQ4323I6, JQ432258, GQ872157, JQ432317, JQ432259, JQ432223, JQ432319, JQ432261, GQ870655, JQ432320, JQ432262, GQ872158, JQ432318, JQ432260 USA: MD: Frederick Co. USA: TN: Carter Co. Absent 9 L. euserratipalpe JQ432321, JQ432263, GQ870656, JQ432322, JQ432264, GQ872160 USA: MD: Montgomery Co. USA: MD: Frederick Co., USA: MD: Montgomery Co. Absent 10 L. nigropalpi JQ432323, JQ432265, JQ432224, JQ432324, JQ432266, JQ432225, JQ432325, JQ432267, JQ432226 USA: MD: Frederick Co. USA: MD: Montgomery Co., USA: TN: Washington Co., USA: VA: Fairfax Co. Absent 6 L. poliluin JQ432326, JQ432268, JQ432227, JQ432327, JQ432269, JQ432228, jQ432328, JQ432270, JQ432229, JQ432329, JQ43227I USA: AR: Lawrence Co. USA: MD: Montgomery Co. Present 6 L. uxoriwn JQ432339, JQ432281, JQ432235, JQ432338, JQ432280, JQ432236 USA: VA: Smythe Co. USA: MD: Montgomery Co. Absent 8 L. veutricosum JQ432348, JQ432290, JQ432349, JQ432291, JQ432242, JQ432350, JQ432292, JQ432243 USA: TN: Blount Co. USA: TN: Washington Co. Present 5 L. verrucosum JQ432351, JQ432293, JQ432244, JQ432347, JQ432289, JQ432241 USA: TN: Cumberland Co. USA: MD: Montgomery Co., USA: TN: Washington Co. Present 3 L. vittation JQ432333, JQ432275, JQ432232, GQ870651, JQ432334, JQ432276, GQ872155, JQ432335, JQ432277, JQ432233, JQ432336, JQ432278, JQ432234,GQ870652, JQ432337, JQ432279, GQ872156 USA: TN: Davidson Co. USA: MD: Montgomery Co. Absent 4 where F is the imposed bending force (in Newtons), D is vertical displacement of the beam at the point where F is applied (in meters), E is the elastic modulus of the material, / is the second moment of area of the beam, and L is the distance (in meters) between the base of the beam and the point where F is applied. E was assumed to be the same in all penes and was treated as a constant. / is a measure of architectural stiffness and reflects the amount and distribution of material around the flexural axis of a beam. It varies in proportion to d^, where rf is a characteristic length of an isometric system. We used the width of the propeltidium of the carapace between coxae I and II {d) as the characteristic length; the propeltidium is a single sclerite and is largely unaffected by nutritional or reproductive status of an adult specimen. To determine the size correction for F, we solved Equation 2 for F by converting all other parameters to d" by dimensional analysis: [Fi] = DIL-^ = d^d^d~^ =d^ (3) Thus, we size corrected by dividing its measured value by the square of carapace width to obtain cF„,ax- We obtained elastic efficiency R by dividing the area under the unloading portion of the hysteresis loop (i.e., mechanical energy out) by the area under the corresponding loading portion of the loop Wi (i.e., mechanical energy in) (Fig. 3A, C, D). Given our assumptions of isometry and constant E (see above), no size correction for R was required. Tgo was the time (in seconds) required for the force of flexural resistance to undergo viscoelastic relaxation to 90% Fmax- We did not attempt to correct Tgg for size given the absence of a time dimension in Eq. 1. In cases where 90% F,„ax was not reached after 180 s, 180 s was used as the relaxation time. cF,„ax and Tgo were log-transformed to minimize heteroscedasticity between dorsal, ventral and lateral bending and between sacculate and non-sacculate groups. Data analysis. — We used phylogenetic comparative methods in statistical analysis to control for covariance due to shared evolutionary history. We established a phylogenetic frame¬ work by pruning a maximum clade credibility tree from a previous Bayesian-likelihood analysis of leiobunine phylogeny BURNS & SHULTZ— GENITAL BIOMECHANICS OF OPILIONES 203 Figure 2. — Experimental apparatus. A. Forces associated with flexural displacement of harvestman penes were measured using a force transducer mounted vertically on a computer-driven translation stage, with vertical movement recorded by a displacement transducer. Penes were glued to a glass coverslip in cantilevered position. The mounted penis was placed in a bath of Ringer's solution and the coverslip was secured to the side of the bath with neodymium magnets (nm). A non-magnetic wire bent at 90° was attached to the input tube of the force transducer, brought into contact with the penis and used to bend the penis in three directions: dorsal, ventral and lateral. B. Lateral view of penis oriented for dorsal flexion. L, beam length, D, vertical displacement of beam (max. 0.05L). C. Photo of apparatus. (Burns et al. 2013) to include only the 10 species examined here (Fig. 1 A). The geiger package (Harmon et al. 2008), written in the statistical programming language R (R Development Core Team 2008), was used to evaluate evolutionary models for each variable. The models included Brownian motion, directional evolution (Brownian motion with a trend), Pagel’s lambda (phylogenetic signal), kappa (punctuated equilibrium), and delta (time-dependent rates or comparable to early burst evolutionary model) (Pagel 1997, 1999). Evolutionary models were evaluated using the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc), adjusted by the number of estimated parameters for each model. Model probability was determined by AICc weights (Burnham & Anderson 2004). We performed phylogenetic principal components analyses using the R-based package phy tools (Revell 2012) to explore covariation among mechanical variables. The predictions presented in the introduction anticipate positive covariation among variables that should be reflected in similarities in variable loadings and the placement of sacculate and non- sacculate species into separate clusters. Differences in me¬ chanical variables between sacculate and non-sacculate groups were investigated further using phylogenetic multiple analysis of variance (pMANOVA) (Garland et al. 1993) as implement¬ ed in the geiger package. The Wilk’s lambda test statistic and significance level were calculated for the data and for one million Brownian-motion simulations based on the evolution¬ ary variance/covariance matrix estimated from the data across the phylogeny. Thus, model significance indicated by the standard MANOVA is supported by the commonality of the actual-data test statistic compared to a null distribution. We conducted Shapiro-Wilk’s and Levene’s tests (using the R package asbio; Aho 2014) on each variable to assess normality and homoscedasticity. RESULTS Models of evolution. — We used the fitContinuous function in the R package geiger to determine the best fit based on AICc for five potential models of evolution for each mechanical variable (Table 2). Most variables were best modeled by Brownian motion. This result was reinforced by maximum likelihood estimates of Pagel’s lambda, which equaled or approached 1.0 for several traits across the three bending directions, including dorsal logTgg, dorsal and lateral logcF,„^,v, and ventral and lateral R. A lambda value of 1 .0 is considered equivalent to a Brownian motion evolutionary model (Boettiger et al. 2012) and indicates that covariance can be largely attributed to shared evolutionary history (i.e., length of shared branches.) Two mechanical variables had lower AICc scores for non-Brownian models; lateral XogTgo was best modeled by the kappa branch transformation (k = 6.6E-214, AICc = 252.56) and lateral R was best modeled by the lambda branch transformation (L = 0.715, AlCc = 4.06). In both cases, the Brownian model had the next highest AIC 204 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 3. — Diagrammatic plots illustrating biomechanical variables and ventral sample data. A. Hysteresis loop showing parameters used to calculate elastic efficiency R. The work generated v/hen a penis is loaded in flexion is proportional to the area under the loading curve (Wi). The v/ork generated by the penis against the force transducer during re-extension (Wo) reflects the elastic energy stored in the penis. Thus, WJWi equals R. B. Plot illustrating determination of Tgg, the time required for the maximum force of flexural resistance F,„c,x to relax to 90% F,„ax- We anticipated that a penis specialized for coercive interaction with females should have a higher F,„^x, Tgo and R than penes adapted to accommodate female preferences. C. Hysteresis loop for ventral flexion in Leiobunum politum specimen (sacculate). D. Hysteresis loop for ventral flexion in a L. euserratipalpe specimen (non-sacculate, calcar species-group). weight (lateral Tpo^O.!?; lateral .R = 0.31), indicating that the alternative mode! did not provide significant improvement over Brownian motion. However, it may be meaningful that the traits best modeled by the more-complex functions were both derived from lateral bending. Exploring covariation in niec.hanical variables using principal components analysis. — We performed a phylogenetic principal components analysis using a multivariate lambda model of evolution to account for phylogenetic covariance due to species relatedness (k — 6.9E-5, LogL A, = 36.1). Variable loadings are given in Table 3 and plotted alongside species scores in Fig. 4. Principal components ! and 2 accounted for about 80% of total variance. Several mechanical variables for dorsal and ventral bending loaded highly on PCI, particularly dorsal and ventral logr9o ^nd dorsal R. Variables associated with lateral bending tended to load more heavily on PC2. Principal component 1 separated the L. calcar group from all other species, indicating that its members had compara¬ tively high dorsal and ventral logTso- Principal component 2 separated four sacculate species (L. verrucosum, L. aldricM, L. politum, L. bracchiolum) into one cluster and the non-sacculate vittatum group (L. vittatum, L. uxorium) plus the sacculate L. ventricosum in another. The ventricosumivittatum group was characterized by comparatively high lateral and ventral R, long lateral logTpo, and short dorsal and ventral logTgo- Mechanical comparisons between sacculate and non-sacculate penes. — Results from group-mean comparisons using phylo¬ genetic MANOVA are summarized in Fig. 5. No significant difference between sacculate and non-sacculate groups was found for R (Wilk’s A. = 0.33, F3,6 = 4.04, model P = 0.069, phylogenetic P = 0.68) or logcF,,,^,^ (Wilk’s A. = 0.7, F3,6 = 0.856, model R = 0.512, phylogenetic F = 0.19) for any of the three flexural direction. High phylogenetic P-values for these models indicate that similar group means were achieved in most simulations, where phylogenetic branch lengths are randomly rescaled to allow greater potential change along longer segments. There was a significant difference between sacculate and non-sacculate species in logTgo (Wilk’s A, = 0.26, Fa^e = 5.77, mode! P < 0.05) (Fig. 5D), with non-sacculate penes taking BURNS & SHULTZ— GENITAL BIOMECHANICS OF OPILIONES 205 Table 2. — Evolutionary model selection for body size and mechanical force traits. Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample size (AICCwt) standardized weights mechanical reproductive traits. Models included Brownian motion (random walk), Directional (Brownian motion with a trend), kappa (punctuated equilibrium), lambda (phylogenetic signal), and delta (time-dependence) (Pagel 1999, 1997). Unstandardized weights were calculated with the equation AICcwt = (Burnham & Anderson 2004). Preferred model (greatest AlCc^t) is indicated with asterisk (*). Model Mechanical variable Brownian (AICcw.) Directional (AICCw,) kappa (AICcwt) lambda (AICcwt) delta (AICCwt) Elastic efficiency (R) Dorsal *0.4098 0.0719 0.1628 0.1553 0.2002 Ventral *0.5729 0.0768 0.1173 0.1141 0.1189 Lateral 0.3069 0.0528 0.1432 *0.3596 0.1373 90%-relaxation time (Tgo) Dorsal 0.6216 0.1962 0.0564 0.0564 0.0694 Ventral 0.5843 0.0851 0.0536 0.1017 0.1752 Lateral 0.2695 0.0453 *0.4407 0.1377 0.1067 Maximum experimental displacement force (F,„oJ Dorsal *0.6211 0.0866 0.0882 0.0563 0.1476 Ventral *0.4059 0.0720 0.1293 0.1742 0.2185 Lateral 0.6525 0.0823 0.0839 0.0592 0.1221 significantly more time to reach 90% of However, this result was not robust to evolutionary data replication (phylogenetic P = 0.7815), indicating that a significant group difference based on sac presence would not be found under the majority of logTpo simulations with identical evolutionary conditions. Tests of data normality and heteroscedasticity indicated that all variables were normally distributed, but there were unequal variances between sacculate and non- sacculate species for many variables, primarily those measured during dorsal flexion (dorsal log(:F„,„v; Fi g = 16.7, P <0.01; logTet): Fi g = 8.61, P <0.05). Heteroscedasticity within the non-sacculate category is consistent with results from the principal components analysis (Fig. 4), where the vittatum group tended to cluster with the sacculate species, and not with the non-sacculate calcar group. Although phylogenetic simulation did not identify a significant difference in \ogT<)o between sacculate and non- sacculate species, we performed three follow-up phylogenetic univariate tests comparing means of dorsal, ventral, and Table 3. — Trait loadings of phylogenetic principal component analyses, eigenvalues, and percent variance explained by first two principal components (PC). Mechanical variable PC 1 PC 2 Elastic efficiency (R) Dorsal -0.783 0.254 Ventral -0.661 -0.655 Lateral -0.476 -0.811 90% relaxation time {Tgo) Dorsal -0.977 -0.018 Ventral -0.741 -0.008 Lateral -0.566 -0.775 Max. resistance force(F„,aJ Dorsal -0.726 0.579 Ventral -0.829 0.452 Lateral -0.596 0.481 Eigenvalues 4.67 2.52 % Variance 51.89 28.05 lateral XogTgo. We found significantly longer relaxation times for dorsal (Fi g = 5.16, P <0.05) and lateral (F| g = 19.21, P <0.001) bending in non-sacculate species, and a similar, though non-significant, trend for higher ventral logTpo (Fi g = 0.639, P — 0.78). These results demonstrate significant differentiation of elastic responses in penile cuticle between sacculate and non-sacculate species. Following the result from the phylogenetic principal components analysis, which separated non-sacculate species into vittatwnlventricosum and calcar groups, we repeated the phylogenetic MANOVA with three group-mean comparisons, separating trait values by sacculate, vittatumiventricosum, and calcar group membership. This model yielded significant differences in all three variables (R: Wilk’s 1 = 0.05, Fs.io = 5.76, model P < 0.01; logcF),,^^: Wilk’s A, = 0.1 16, Fg lo = 3.23, model P < 0.05), although in phylogenetic simulation only \ogTgo was found to be significantly different between groups (Wilk’s I = 0.0079, Fgjo = 17.107, model P <0.0001, phylogenetic P <0.01). A phylogenetic ANOVA with Holm- Bonferroni posthoc test to compare bending directions for each of the three variables identified significantly higher dorsal logTpo (Fj j = 20.83, P <0.05) in the calcar group as compared to the two other groups, as well as a hierarchy of significant differences in lateral logT^o (Fu = 43.52, P <0.01) between the sacculate, vittatwnlventricosum, and calcar groups (Fig. 5). Using this method, we additionally found significant differ¬ ences between the sacculate and calcar groups in ventral R (F) 7 = 14.06, P <0.05) and between the calcar and vittatum groups in dorsal logcF,,,^^ (Fi^y = 18.05, P <0.05) and ventral logcF„,„v (Fi,7= 15.18, P <0.05). Values of R and logcF„,„.,. for the vittatum + L. ventricosum and sacculate groups were statistically indistinguishable. DISCUSSION Previous work on the evolution of reproductive structures and mating systems in Leiobunum and related taxa (Burns & Shultz 2015) identified the coevolution of relative maximum 206 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 4. — Phylogenetic principal components analysis of mechanical force data. The pPCA, applied to dorsal, ventral, and lateral measures of maximum flexural resistance (log cF,„a^), elastic efficiency (R) and time to 90% relaxation of F„,ax (logTgo). Principal components 1 and 2 together account for 80% of total data variance. Trait loadings are indicated by arrows, color coded by flexural orientation. Non-sacculate species indicated by white shapes — squares for the calcar group, diamonds for the vittatum group — and sacculate species indicated by black circles. force produced by the penis protractor muscle and by the closure of the female genital operculum. These relative forces are higher in non-sacculate species, which suggests that greater mechanical forces are produced and resisted in non-sacculate forms. Following this line of evidence, we tested our expectation that presence and absence of penile nuptial gift sacs in Leiohiamm correspond to differences in the flexural biomechanics of the penis shaft. We predicted that penes in sacculate and non-sacculate species differ in the magnitudes of three biomechanical variables — maximum resistance to exper¬ imental penile flexure (F„,ax), efficient storage of elastic energy (i?) for use in restoring the flexed penis to the resting state, and persistence of the restoring force during static flexion (Tgo) — with the non-sacculate species having higher values. We obtained these values for each of three biologically relevant bending directions, and used modern phylogenetic compara¬ tive methods to find covariation between nuptial gift sac presence and biomechanical specialization. Our success in doing so demonstrates that biomechanical data can be obtained from arthropod genitalia and may be useful in resolving functionally distinct groups. Results from phylogenetic MANOVA showed no significant differences between sacculate and non-sacculate species groups, except perhaps in Tgo. These findings are consistent with those obtained from multivariate analysis based on measurements and functional inferences from static reproduc- BURNS & SHULTZ— GENITAL BIOMECHANICS OF OPILIONES 207 Figure 5. — Phylogenetic ANOVA results for logrpo. Bar graph results summarize phylogenetic ANOVA tests comparing the logio- transfonned viscoelastic relaxation times of penes displaced dorsally, ventrally, and laterally for sacculate, vittatumiventricosiim and calcar clusters. Bars are group means plus standard error for sacculate (black), vitlatumjventricoswn (hatched lines) and ca/cr/r-group (white) species for each of three bending aspects. Asterisks indicate significance level of between-group comparisons (‘*’ P, <0.05; P, <0.01). tive morphology (Burns & Shultz 2015). Specifically, canonical correlation, bivariate correlation and principal components analyses placed leiobunine species along a continuum of “antagonistic specialization” in which sacculate species dominated one end and non-sacculate species dominated the other, with a broad region of overlap that precluded classification into distinct sacculate/enticement and non- sacculate/coercion groups. In contrast, results from the current study differ in that pPCA (Fig. 4) appeared to recover three species clusters rather than a single cluster or continuum. PCI may represent the antagonistic potential associated with dorsal and ventral penile flexure, with higher values toward the left side of the plot. This axis separates the non-sacculate calcar group, with high antagonistic potential, from all other species, including the non-sacculate vittatum species-group. Furthermore, PC2 appears to correspond to the antagonistic potential associated with lateral flexure and separates the vittatum species-group plus the sacculate L. veiitricosum from the remaining sacculate taxa. More specifically, PCA results from our current study indicate that penes in the calcar group offer greater resistance to dorsal and ventral flexure relative to body size icF,„ax) than those of the other species examined. Further, relatively more elastic energy is stored in the flexed penis for use in flexural resistance during re-extension (R), and the restoring force persists for a longer time (Tgo). This result is consistent with initial predictions, but was not found in the vittatum group, and the results were thus inconsistent with predictions about non-sacculate penes generally. The species outside the calcar group were separated primarily by factors associated with lateral flexure, with sacculate species (except L. ventricosum) having greater resistance to lateral flexion relative to body size than the vittatumjventricosum cluster. The relatively greater flexural compliance of the vittatumjventricosum cluster may be attributed to the greater relative length (L) of penes and the low second moment of area (/ ) of the penis shaft in the vittatum group, which is narrow and circular in cross section rather than wide and dorsoventrally compressed as in sacculate species (see Eq. 1; Fig. 1). In contrast, lateral bending in the penes of the vittatumjventricosum cluster showed viscoelastic properties higher than those of most sacculate species (i.e., with higher energy storage and longer relaxation times). Given the rather low sample size and high experimental variance in some of our data, it is premature to conclude that the three clusters recovered by PCA correspond to functional groups or mating strategies. Furthermore, we modeled displacement assuming penes were the equivalent of a beam, although unlike standard beams, penes of these species are not consistent in width across length. While we did not vary the application site of forces, we could expect incremental changes in second moment of area (/) as the site of displacement (L) is repositioned. However, the combination of mechanical properties within each cluster, together with other morpho¬ logical and behavioral observations, may offer new insights and testable hypotheses. Specifically, we propose that the calcar group still exemplifies an antagonistic mating system in which male coercion and forced penetration have played an important role in shaping genitalic morphology and biome¬ chanics. This conclusion is consistent with the robust pedipalps in males that are used to clasp the female during mating and a sclerotized latch mechanism at the pregenital opening of females (Ingianni et al. 2011). The cluster of four sacculate species may represent a mating system dominated by male enticement of females. Members of this group have short but dorsoventrally flexible penes with gift-bearing sacs. The penes are poorly designed for imposing significant mechanical forces and, in fact, are mounted on a fluid-filled turret (haematodocha) during mating (Fig. 1) that would tend to accommodate rather than resist female movements. In addition, females of the species group have no special elaboration of the pregenital opening that might resist forceful penetration, although larger body size alone may be a sufficient defense. Finally, we speculate that the genitalic features of the mixed vittatumjventricosum cluster could reflect specializations that allow females to coerce prolonged delivery of nuptial gifts from males by entrapping or imposing possible damage to the penis (as in Kuriwada & Kasuya 2011). Such a system would combine elements of enticement by the male and antagonism by the female and might thus account for the intermediacy between enticement and antagonism revealed in our previous study (Burns & Shultz 2015). A few other lines of evidence are consistent with female coercion of males via penis entrapment. Specifically, recent behavioral analyses of mating in L. vittatum from Wisconsin indicate that females may regulate the duration of mating contact, in part, by resisting male attempts at separation (Fowler-Finn et a!. 2014) and that males sometimes show signs of physiological exhaustion after mating (K. Fowler-Finn, pers. comm.). Interestingly, male L. vittatum from Massachu¬ setts have been found with no other damage than a broken penis (Fig. 6A-C), which is consistent with persistent penile entrapment by the female. Although we previously character¬ ized the sclerotized sterno-opercular mechanism in female L. vittatum as a pregenital barrier (Burns et al. 2013; Burns & Shultz 2015), the pregenital mechanism could also be used for entrapping the penis. In contrast, our own video-based observations of mating in L. ventricosum show no obvious signs of female coercion during mating. However, Leiobunum 208 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 6. — Male Leiobumim vittatum found with broken penes, suggesting mechanical damage incurred during mating. A. Mating L. vittatiim (female left, male right). Male clasps female coxa II (as in Fig. 1C) with damaged penis extended. Female palpates male haematodocha. Lateral and dorsal drawings of L. vittatum penis are inset. B. Ventrolateral view of male L. vittatum with broken penis. C. Ventral view of same male. In both examples, male penis is broken at the upturned glans portion. All pictures courtesy of Joe Warfel/Eighth Eye Photography, Massachusetts, USA. holtae McGhee, 1977 (not included in the present study), a derived species that appears to have evolved from L. ventricosum-Mke. ancestors (Burns et al. 2012), is morpholog¬ ically similar to L. vittatum in having a long, thin non- sacculate penis. In addition, the female pregenital opening has a large, horizontally-arranged opercular plate that can be pressed against a large sternite dorsally. Again, this mecha¬ nism could be interpreted as either a barrier (which seems substantially overdesigned given the apparent compliance of the penis) or a penis trap. It is therefore possible that the condition in L. holtae evolved from a less extreme form of female coercion that may be practiced by L. ventricosiim. Testing this speculative hypothesis will require new, intensive studies of mating behavior and functional morphology. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to Mary E.L. Burns and the attendees of the 2013 American Arachnological Society held at East Tennessee State University in Johnson City, TN, for their assistance in specimen collection and to Joe Warfel for photographs of L. vittatum. We additionally thank Dan Gruner, David Haw¬ thorne, Sara Bergbreiter, Priscila Chaverri, and four anony¬ mous reviewers for discussion of the manuscript. MB was supported by the University of Maryland and GRF, DDIG, and PRFB grants from the National Science Foundation. JWS was supported by the Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Ah-King, M., A.B. Barron & M.E. Herberstein. 2014. Genital evolution: Why are females still understudied? PLoS Biol 12(5): el001851. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pbio. 1001851. Aho, K. 2014. Foundational and applied statistics for biologists using R. CRC/Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton. Albo, M.J., T. Bilde & G. Uhl. 2013. Sperm storage mediated by BURNS & SHULTZ— GENITAL BIOMECHANICS OF OPILIONES 209 cryptic female choice for nuptial gifts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280:e20131735. doi;10.1098/rspb.2013.1735. Boettiger, C., G. Coop & P.L. Ralph. 2012. Is your phylogeny informative? Measuring the power of comparative methods. Evolution 66:2240-2251. Bonduriansky, R. & T. Day. 2003. The evolution of static allometry in sexually selected traits. Evolution 57:2450-2458. Brennan, P.L.R., C.J. Clark & R.O. Prum. 2010. Explosive eversion and functional morphology of the duck penis supports sexual conflict in waterfowl genitalia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277(1686): doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2139. Brennan, P.L., R.O. Prum, K.G. McCracken, M.D. Sorenson, R.E. Wilson & T.R. Birkhead. 2007. Coevolution of male and female genital morphology in waterfowl. PLoS ONE 2(5):e418. doi: 10. 1371/journal.pone.0000418. Burnham, K.P. & D.R. Anderson. 2004. Multimodal inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Research 33:261-304. Burns, M.M. & J.W. Shultz. 2015. Biomechanical diversity of mating structures among harvestmen species is consistent with a spectrum of precopulatory strategies. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0137181. doi: 10. 1371/journal.pone.0137181. Burns, M., M. Hedin & J.W. Shultz. 2012. Molecular phylogeny of the leiobunine harvestmen of eastern North America (Opiliones: Sclerosomatidae: Leiobuninae). Molecular Phylogenetics & Evo¬ lution 63:291-298. Burns, M.M., M. Hedin & J.W. Shultz. 2013. Comparative analyses of reproductive structures in harvestmen (Opiliones) reveal multiple transitions from courtship to precopulatory antagonism. PLoS ONE 8(6):e66767. doi: 10. 1371 /journal. pone. 0066767. Cassidy, E.J., E. Bath, S.F. Chenoweth & R. Bonduriansky. 2014. Sex-specific patterns of morphological diversification: Evolution of reaction norms and static allometries in Neriid flies. Evolution 68:368-383. Cayetano, L., A. A. Maklakov, R.C. Brooks & R. Bonduriansky. 2011. Evolution of male and female genitalia following release from sexual selection. Evolution 65:2171-2183. Crosby, C.R. & S.C. Bishop. 1924. Notes on the Opiliones of the southeastern United States with descriptions of new species. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 40:8-26. Day, T. & K.A. Young. 2004. Competitive and facilitative evolutionary diversification. BioScience 54:101-109. Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton. Edwards, D.L. & L.L. Knowles. 2014. Species detection and individual assignment in species delimitation: can integrative data increase efficacy? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281 (1777): doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2765. Fowler-Finn, K.D., E. Triana & O.G. Miller. 2014. Mating in the harvestman Leiohwnmi vittatum (Arachnida: Opiliones): from premating struggles to solicitous tactile engagement. Behaviour 151:1663-1686. Garland, T., A.W. Dickerman, C.M. Janis & J.A. Jones. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Systematic Biology 42:265-292. Harmon, L.J., J.T. Weir, C.D. Brock, R.E. Glor & W. Challenger. 2008. GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations. Bioinfor¬ matics 24:129-131. Hosken, D.J. & P. Stockley. 2004. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:87-93. Ingianni, E., C.R. McGhee & J.W. Shultz. 2011. Taxonomy of the Leiobinmm calcar species-group (Opiliones, Sclerosomatidae, Leiobuninae). Journal of Arachnology 39:454-481. Koch, C.L. 1839. Ubersicht des Arachnidensystems. Zweites Heft, Niirnberg. Kokko, H., R. Brooks, M.D. Jennions & J. Morley. 2003. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270:653-664. Kuriwada, T. & E. Kasuya. 2011. Nuptial gifts protect male bell crickets from female aggressive behavior. Behavioral Ecology 23:302-306. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arrl86. Leonard J.L. & A. Cdrdoba-Aguilar, eds. 2010. The Evolution of Primary Sexual Characters in Animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Machado, G., G.S. Requena, C. Toscano-Gadea, E. Stanley & R. Macias-Ordofiez. 2015. Male and female mate choice in harvest- men: General patterns and inferences on the underlying processes. Pp. 169-201. In Cryptic Female Choice in Arthropods: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Prospects. (A.V. Peretti, A. Aisenberg, eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. McGhee, C.R. 1977. The politum group (bulbate species) of Leiobwmm (Arachnida: Phalangida: Phalangiidae) of North America. Journal of Arachnology 3:151-163. Marquez, E.J. & L.L. Knowles. 2007. Correlated evolution of multivariate traits: detecting co-divergence across multiple dimen¬ sions. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:2334-2348. Masly, J.P. & Y. Kamimura. 2014. Asymmetric mismatch in strain- specific genital morphology causes increased harm to Drosophila females. Evolution 68:2401-2411. Pagel, M. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phytogenies. Zoologica Scripta 26:331-348. Pagel, M. 1999. Inferring the historical pattern of biological evolution. Nature 401:877-884. Parker, G.A., C.M. Lessells & L.W. Simmons. 2013. Sperm competition games: a general model for precopulatory male-male competition. Evolution 67:95-109. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Accessed 16 March 2014. Online at http://www. R-project.org Revell, L.J. 2012. Phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3:217-223. Sanchez, V., B.E. Hernandez-Banos & C. Cordero. 2011. The evolution of a female genital trait widely distributed in the Lepidoptera: comparative evidence for an effect of sexual coevolution. PLoS ONE 6(8):e22642. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0022642. Say, T. 1821. An account of the Arachnides of the United States. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 2:59- 82. Tanabe, T. & T. Sota. 2013. Both male and female novel traits promote the correlated evolution of genitalia between the sexes in an arthropod. Evolution 68:441-452. Vincent, J., 2012. Structural Biomaterials. 3rd edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Vogel, S. 2003. Comparative Biomechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Weed, C.M. 1889. A descriptive catalogue of the Phalangiinae of Illinois. Bulletin of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History 3:79-97. Weed, C.M. 1893. A synopsis of the harvest-spiders (Phalangiidae) of South Dakota. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 20:285-292. Wood, H.C. 1868. On the Phalangeae of the United States of America. Proceedings of the Essex Institute 6:10-40. Manuscript received 15 December 2015, revised 22 February 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:210-217 Mating behavior of the solitary neotropical harvestman Pachyloides thovellii (Arachnida: Opiliones) Estefania Stanley', Gabriel Francescoli" and Carlos A. Toscano-Gadea': 'Laboratorio de Etologia, Ecologia y Evolucion, Institute de Investigaciones Biologicas Clemente Estable, Avenida Italia 3318, C.P. 11.600. Montevideo, Uruguay. E- mail: estefaniastanley@gmail.com; “ Seccion Etologia, Facultad de Ciencias, UdelaR, Igua 4225 esquina Mataojo, C.P. 11.400. Montevideo, Uruguay Abstract. In order to study how sexual selection takes place during mating, it is necessary to have a clear knowledge of the interactions that occur throughout mating and which morphological and behavioral traits are involved. Available information about harvestman reproductive biology is mainly restricted to anecdotal field observations, most of them lacking a detailed description and quantification of mating behavior. In this paper, we study the reproductive behavior of the gonyleptid Pachyloides thorellii Holmberg, 1878 (Pachylinae) and provide quantitative and descriptive information about its sexual behavior. We observed 15 matings, measured females and males, and analysed our behavioral data in the context of individuals’ sizes. We observed conspicuous pre-copulatory, copulatory and post-copulatory courtship. We also found that females have several strategies to reject males’ mating attempts. Like most gonyleptids, males and females of P. thorellii mate in face-to-face position; however, we observed that both male and female clasp their chelicerae mutually. This behavior has not previously been reported for the suborder Laniatores. The information obtained through this study establishes the basis for further studies on this species’ reproductive biology and supports the suitability of this species as a model to explore the importance of male copulatory courtship for female choice and sperm use. Keywords: Sexual behavior, pre-copulatory courtship, chelicerae clasp, copulatory courtship Opiliones is the third most diverse order within arachnids and it is divided into four suborders: Cyphophthalmi, Eupnoi, Dyspnoi, and Laniatores (Pinto-da-Rocha & Giribet 2007). In general, harvestmen are omnivorous, nocturnal creatures, showing high morphological and behavioral diversity (Savory 1938; Coddington et al. 1990; Adis & Harvey 2000). In Cyphophthalmi, reproduction can be achieved asexually through parthenogenesis or sexually through a spermatophore transference (Tsurusaki 1986; Machado & Macias-Ordonez 2007). However, the most widespread sperm transfer mecha¬ nism in the order is direct copulation. Males possess an eversible penis that is introduced into the females’ operculum to achieve sperm transfer (Machado & Macias-Ordonez 2007). Although studies regarding harvestman reproductive be¬ havior have significantly increased in the last decade, there are still many gaps in our knowledge (Machado et al. 2015). Most studies on harvestman sexual behavior are field studies on Neotropical species of the suborder Laniatores, particularly of Gonyleptidae, with some kind of parental care. Sexual interactions in harvestmen mainly follow the scheme presented by Machado et al. (2015) where the mating process is divided into three stages: Pre-copulatory, Copulatory and Post- copulatory. In each stage, different sources of selection may shape both the morphology and the behaviors observed in different species (Fowler-Finn et al. 2014). Therefore, having a detailed description of the behaviors observed during these stages is the first step towards understanding sexual selection in each species. During the Pre-copulatory stage, individuals generally evaluate their partner through courtship and decide whether to continue with further mating (Andersson 1994; Machado et al. 2015). In harvestmen, this stage is brief and courtship involves touching their partner’s body (by males, females or both) using legs I and II. There is a small number of species for which courtship has been described; in Chavesincola inex- pectahilis Soares & Soares, 1946 and Pseudopucrolia sp. (Gonyleptidae), the male taps the female’s genital opening with legs II and gently touches her dorsum with legs I (Nazareth & Machado 2009, 2010), while in Zygopachylus albomarginis Chamberlin, 1925 (Manaosbiidae) it is the female that initially taps the male carapace and legs, and if the male returns the taps then copulation takes place (Mora 1990). The Copulatory stage involves a closer evaluation of the partner, intromission, and sperm transfer. Stimulation through copulatory courtship is generally the most extended way in which such evaluation occurs (Eberhard 1996; Machado et al. 2015). Copulatory courtship is generally performed by males and consists of touching or grazing the legs and/or dorsum of the female. Males of Discocyrtus pectinifemur Mello-Leitao, 1937 and C. inexpectabilis (Gony¬ leptidae) tap females’ bodies with legs II and I, respectively, during intromission. In other gonyleptid species such as Acutisoma longipes (Roewer, 1913), males intensively tap the dorsum and hind legs of females (Machado & Macias-Ordonez 2007; Nazareth & Machado 2009). Finally, mating is followed by a mate guarding period (Post- copulatory stage). In this stage, the male remains with the female and continues to court and/or stimulate her in order to reduce sperm competition and increase reproductive success (Simmons 2001; Machado et al. 2015). In some harvestman species, males remain with the female, touching her from time to time with legs I and II, until she lays one or more eggs. This period can range from a few minutes (Z. albomarginis (Mora 1990); Iporongaia pustulosa Mello-Leitao, 1935 (Requena & Machado 2014)) to several days {A. longipes (Machado & Olivera 1998); C. inexpectabilis (Nazareth & Machado 2009)). The goal of the present study was to describe the mating behavior of the gonyleptid Pachyloides thorellii Holmberg, 1878. This is the first mating description for a solitary species lacking any kind of post-oviposition parental care. We first provide information about the behaviors that conform to the Pre-copulatory, Copulatory and Post-copulatory stages with a 210 STANLEY ET AL.— MATING BEHAVIOR IN SOLITARY HARVESTMEN 211 Figure 1. — Measure taken for males (a) and females (b) of P. tlwrellii. dsl: dorsal scute length. flow diagram. Second, we examine relative sizes of the sexes in the context of the observed behaviors to evaluate whether body size affects mating duration. And finally we provide, for the first time, detailed photographs of the genitalia of this species. METHODS Study organisms. — Pachyloides tlwrellii inhabits cryptozoic environments in southern Uruguay, characterized by the presence of leaf litter and pieces of tree bark. Males and females have similar sizes and, contrary to what is observed in other species of the family, they do not seem to be sexually dimorphic (Pinto-da-Rocha & Giribet 2007; Giuliani 2008; Willemart et al. 2008). Females start ovipositing approximate¬ ly a month after copulation and perform several ovipositions in which each egg is placed in isolation under a rock or inside a tree bark fissure (Stanley 2011). Collection and maintenance in captivity. — We collected adult individuals of P. thorellii at Marindia (Canelones, Uruguay; 34°46'S, 55°49'W), during January 2008 and 2009. The individuals were taken to the Laboratorio de Etologia, Ecologia y Evolucion (I.I.B.C.E., Montevideo, Uruguay) and held individually in Petri dishes of 9 cm diameter and 1.5 cm height, with sand as substrate and wet cotton wool as a water supply. They were fed ad libitum once a week with apple and cucumber pieces, cat food, and pieces of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera) larvae. We maintained individuals under natural photoperiod. The average temperature during breeding was 26.3 °C (± 1.8 SD, range = 17.5-37). Behavioral observations. — The experiments were performed in March 2008 and 2009, with a room temperature of 24 °C (± 1.2 SD, range = 20-30). Females were placed in Petri dishes of 14.5 cm diameter and 2.5 cm height (encounter arena), with sand as substrate and wet cotton wool to maintain humidity, 24-48 h before the experiments, for acclimation and stress reduction. Males were placed inside the arena immediately before the beginning of each encounter. Males were carefully picked up with forceps by one of their legs IV, to prevent the release of chemical substances that could affect behavior. Then they were gently placed approximately at 10 cm from the female. Each trial lasted 30 minutes after the introduction of the male or until the end of mating. If mating was not observed, the same couple was tested again 24 h later. All the observations took place under red light (placed 50 cm from the arena). We recorded each encounter with a Sony Handycam video camera (DCR-SR40 Nightshot; Sony Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and took notes of all interactions. We analyzed the video recordings with J Watcher computer program (Version 0.9, Blumstein et al. 2000), to determine the frequency and duration of each behavior. We used the frequency of transition from one behavior to the other and expressed them in percentages to construct the flow diagram. Morphological features. — After the trials, individuals were fixed and preserved in ethanol 95%. Both males and females were photographed with a digital camera (Nikon Coolpix 5100) mounted on a stereoscopic microscope (Nikon SMZ-IO; Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). We took three separate pictures per individual and using ImageTool software (Version 3.0; Wilcox et al. 1995) software, we measured the length of dorsal scute (Fig. 1). We analyzed the average of the measures taken from the three pictures. Following Willemart et al. (2008), we used dorsal scute length as a size reference to calculate an index of size difference for each couple (dorsal scute length of male divided by dorsal scute length of female). This index was related to mating duration in a linear regression, transforming 212 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1. — Description of F. thorellii mating behavior units observed. Rejection units were only performed by females. Behavior Category Description Touch with leg II Pre-copulatory Mutual touches with the tarsus of the second pair of legs. The individuals stand still on the substrate touching dorsum, sides and/or first three pair of legs of the partner. Touch with leg I and II Pre-copulatory Male intensively taps female’s dorsum with the tarsus of the first pair of legs, while Touches with leg II continues. Rush Pre-copulatory Male extends its pedipalps and quickly approaches the female. Male over female Copulatory Male climbs over female’s dorsum and slides over it while he extends its pedipalps and grazes female’s dorsum. Touch with leg I and 11 continues and this behavior ends when the male locates himself in front of her in a face-to-face position. Grabbing Copulatory Once in face-to-face position the male uses the claw of his pedipalps to grab the coxae of the female’s first pair of legs. Both grab each other’s chelicerae (Fig. 5). Male continues Touch with leg I and II. Elevation Copulatory Using his fourth pair of legs as support, the male elevates the anterior part of his body together v/ith the anterior part of the female’s body forming a 90° angle between them. Copulatory courtship Copulatory Male puts the tarsus of both legs I in the dorsum of the female and slides them towards the sides of her body. He maintains his second pair of legs in the air alternating between right and left to touch the female on the sides and dorsum. Pulls Copulatory Female pulls backwards from the male using her third and fourth pair of legs as support. Leg II movements Copulatory Female moves the second pair of legs slowly. Lowers body Copulatory Female bends her legs lowering her body. Separation Post-copulatory Male retracts penis and releases female’s pedipalp and chelicerae as the female releases male’s chelicerae. Operculum Cleaning Post-copulatory Female scraps the operculum with the claws of her pedipalps and takes them to her mouth. She repeats this several times. Leg Cleaning Post-copulatory Individuals slide their legs through their chelicerae. End Post-copulatory One or both individuals move far away from the other. Rejection units Run away Pre-copulatory Female quickly moves away from the male when he touches her. Bending Pre-copulatory Female retracts legs I, II and pedipalps towards her body while elevating the abdomen and lowering the cephalothorax to the substrate. Kicking Pre-copulatory The female rapidly extends leg IV when male approaches. each variable into logarithmic values. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Coleccion Entomologica de la Facultad de Ciencias, Montevideo, Uruguay. Scanning electron microscope (Jeol JSM 5900LV) images were used to visualize the structures present on the penis and the ovipositor of P. thorelin individuals. Samples were critical point dried and sputter coated with gold, and scanned at the Servicio de Microscopi'a Electronica de Barrido y Micro- analisis, Facultad de Ciencias, Montevideo, Uruguay. Statistical analysis. — All statistical analysis was performed using PAST (Version 1.18, Hammer et al. 2003). We selected P = 0.05 as the limit for statistical significance. We tested the behavioral and morphological data for normality and homogeneity of variances using a Shapiro-Wiik test and Levene test, respectively. If variables showed normality and homogeneity of variances, we used the parametric Student’s /- test; if any of these conditions was not met we used the non- parametric Mann-Wliitney 17-test. We compared dorsal scute length between males and females to determine whether there was any size difference. Then we performed a multiple regression test using size differences within couples as the independent variable and the duration of the different stages defined during mating as the dependent variable. Finally, we performed a multiple logistic regression using presence and absence of rejection as the categorical variable and mating duration and size differences within couples as continuous variables. RESULTS Sexual behavior. — The average duration of the analyzed mating sequences was 690 seconds (± 198 SD, range = 486- 1182 s, n = 15). We defined 14 behaviors (see Table 1 for description) and displayed the transitions from one behavior to the other in a flow diagram (Fig. 2). The mating process was divided into the three stages proposed by Machado et al. (2015): Pre-copulatory, Copulatory and Post-copulatory. Pre-copulatory behavior. — Interactions between male and female began when one or both individuals waved their second pair of legs simultaneously or alternately while they remained still or walked around the arena. Contact was initiated by the male in 87% (« = 13) of the cases, by directing his second pair of legs and walking towards the female. In the remaining cases (13%, n = 2), females initiated contact in a similar way as the majority of males had. When they were close to each other, both male and female touched each other’s dorsum and legs with the tarsi of their first and second pair of legs. The Pre- copulatory Behavior stage showed a mean duration of 18 s (± 12 SD, range = 2-48 s). This stage began with the behavior Touch with leg I and I! and ended with the behavior Grabbing. The male touched the female with leg I and rapidly climbed over her dorsum {Rush). Once over the female, the male touched the female dorsum both with legs I and pedipalps and the touches with leg II accelerated. He immediately slid over the female until reaching a face-to-face position {Male over STANLEY ET AL.— MATING BEHAVIOR IN SOLITARY HARVESTMEN 213 TOUCH WITH LEG II RUSH TOUCH WITH LEG! AND II LEG II I MOVEMENTS I PULLS * — - LOWERS BODY • i SEPARATION 5^ TOUCH WITH LEG II A Q! LEG CLEANING I TOUCH WITH I I LEG II I i I LEG CLEANING | * OPERCULUM CLEANING ' ■ Mana aaeaa I END Precopulatory Behavior Copulatory Behavior Postcopulatory Behavior 71-100 % 57-70 % -¥■ 30-56 % 10-29% ---> 0-9% Figure 2. — Flow diagram of P. tliorellii's mating. Squares with continuous lines contain behavioral units that were performed only by males. Squares with dashed lines contain behavioral units that were performed only by females, and squares with dotted lines represent behavioral units that were performed by both individuals. Arrow thickness represents different frequencies of transition between units and their value is expressed in percentages. female). During this behavior, the female was able to reject or offer certain resistance to the male’s grabbing attempts. Finally, once in front of the female, the male grabbed the base of her first pair of legs with the claw of his pedipalp and then they both grabbed each other’s chelicerae {Grabbing) (Fig. 3). Thirty-three percent (« = 5) of the females accepted male courtship and mated without resistance; of the remaining 67% {n — 10), 60% {n — 6) resisted male attempts to mate but accepted later in the same trial, and 40% {n = 4) rejected males but accepted them 24 h later without resistance. The behaviors observed during female resistance and rejections were Run away. Bending and Kicking (see definitions in Table 1). Neither size difference nor mating duration were correlated with the presence and absence of rejection (logistic regression: Size difference: x" = 2.1, P = 0.15; Mating duration: x‘ = 0.67, P — 0.46). Copulatory behavior. — The Copulatory Behavior stage had a mean duration of 654 s (± 152 SD, range = 403-954 s), and started with the behavior Elevation. After grabbing the female, the male elevated the front part of his body together with the female, reaching copulatory position {Elevation; see Table 1 214 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 3. — Ventral detail of mutual cheliceral grabbing during copulation in P. tlwrellii. Black arrows show the sites where male chelicerae grabbed female chelicerae and the white arrow shows female site of grabbing, r Ch: Right chelicerae; 1 Ch: Left chelicerae; p: penis. for further detail). Simultaneously, the male raised his third pair of legs until he got them on top of the female’s second pair of legs. In this position, while performing Copiilatory courtship, the male inserted his penis into the female’s gonopore and did not withdraw it until the mating ended. At this point, we observed a decrease in the intensity of the male touches with legs I, which then remained constant until the couple separated. Females remained almost immobile during most of this stage, except at the beginning and near the Figure 4. — SEM image of female ovipositor of P. tliorellii. White arrow shows ovipositor opening. end of the stage when they tried to pull away from the males’ grasp. Males maintained their grasp and continued the copulatory courtship. Before Separation, females slowly started moving legs II {Leg II movements) and lowered their bodies by flexing their fourth pair of legs, which obliged males to withdraw the penis and release the female chelicerae and legs (/? =11). Males sometimes finished mating by freeing the female in absence of any of the mentioned female displays (« = 4). Post-copulatory behavior. — The Post-copulatory Behavior stage started immediately after the couple separated and had a mean duration of 63 s (± 75 SD, range = 12-258 s). During that stage, both male and female stayed close to each other (approximately 1 cm away), touching each other’s dorsum and legs with legs II. At the same time, each of them performed Leg cleaning, and during this stage all females were observed carrying out Operculum cleaning. We did not observe a statistically significant relationship between the size ratio of the members of each couple and mating duration or duration of any of the stages (multiple regression: r = 0.63, P — 0.23). Genital apparatus. — The female’s ovipositor has four lobes, each carrying three long setae that point towards the center of the ovipositor, covering the entrance (Fig. 4). The male’s penis has several ornamentations on its pars distalis (Fig. 5). We observed on both sides, two groups of three sensilla, one at the distal end and the other on the base (Figure 5a). Between those groups of sensilla, there is a spiny area that covers the edge of the distal part of the penis (Figure 5b). In the glans, we observe both the ventral process and the stylus (Figure 5). In a closer STANLEY ET AL.— MATING BEHAVIOR IN SOLITARY HARVESTMEN 215 Figure 5. — SEM image of male penis of P. thorellii. a, b: detail of sensilla and spines in the pars distalis; c: ventral process; S: Stylus. look, the ventral process shows several processes on its sides (Figure 5c). DISCUSSION We found that P. thorellii mating behavior is one of the longest found so far in the suborder Laniatores, clearly showing the three stages — Pre-copulatory, Copulatory and Post-copulatory — proposed by Machado et al. (2015). Males touched females with legs I and II from the beginning to the end of the interactions and females were able to resist and/or reject males. We observed that females cooperate with the male during copulation, through cheliceral holding and are able to end mating by lowering their bodies, forcing males to withdraw the penis and release their chelicerae. We found no relationship between the size ratio of each couple and either the probability of rejection or the duration of any stage or the whole mating. As observed in other harvestman species, individuals of P. thorellii seem to identify conspecifics and differentiate males from females after touching them (Willemart et al. 2006; Fowler-Finn et al. 2014). Normally, individuals use their second pair of legs to orient themselves to nearby objects; these legs are not used for locomotion and they are constantly moving in a similar way to insect antennae (Machado et al. 2007). As it was observed, prior to contact, individuals direct their second pair of legs towards their conspecific, approach them, and finally contact takes place. Pre-copulatory court¬ ship in P. thorellii is similar to that reported for other Laniatores (see Table 12.1 in Machado & Maci'as-Ordonez 2007). Particularly in Gonyleptidae, courtship is short and initiates when one individual touches the other. Once the male detects the female, he tries to grab her and mate. However, females can accept mating or resist it. Resistance behaviors in P. thorellii resemble those observed in other members of the family (Gnaspini 1995; Elpino-Campos et al. 2001; Machado & Macias-Ordonez 2007; Willemart et al. 2008; Nazareth & Machado 2009, 2010; Requena & Machado 2014). There was no relationship between rejected males and size ratio within couple members, and rejected males reinitiated courtship several times by touching the female with legs I and II; this behavior may have the function of increasing the probability of female mating acceptance as suggested by Willemart et al. (2006). These facts together with the pre-copulatory behaviors reported by Machado & Macias-Ordonez (2007) in other species, suggest that Laniatores may rely more on courtship than on coercive behaviors as observed in Eupnoi (Machado & Macias-Ordonez 2007). The time individuals remain in pre- copulatory courtship represents a window for evaluation of the potential partner and the length of this stage may be correlated with the capacity of the female to control sperm afterwards. It would be necessary to compare courtship duration and the frequency and duration of the behaviors observed during courtship with the number of offspring obtained from virgin females to assess the function of such behaviors. As mentioned before, the copulatory behavior in P. thorellii is one of the longest found so far for the suborder (Matthiesen 1983; Gnaspini 1995; Machado & Oliveira 1998; Elpino- Campos et al. 2001; Machado & Maci'as-Ordonez 2007; Nazareth & Machado 2009, 2010; Buzatto et al. 2011) and within species of other suborders (Eupnoi: Macias-Ordonez 1997, 2000; Willemart et al. 2006; Dyspnoi: Pabst 1953; Martens 1969), and was characterized by tactile courtship (touches with legs I and II) like many other harvestmen (Machado & Macias-Orddnez 2007). Copulatory position (face-to-face and forming a 90°angle) is similar to what is observed in other harvestmen; the mutual chelicerae holding has not been reported for the suborder Laniatores. Until now it has only been mentioned that females of Zygopachylus alhomarginis extend their chelicerae and pedipalps and grab males by their cephalothorax to bring them closer, but there has been no mention of male cheliceral holding (Mora 1990). Male cheliceral holding was reported for two species of Trogulus Latreille, 1802 (Dyspnoi), in which a male grabs a female’s body with legs I and II and her chelicerae with his chelicerae (Pabst 1953). In females, cheliceral holding was observed in a few species of the genus Ischyropsalis C.L. Koch, 1839 (Dyspnoi) (see Table 12.1 in Machado & Macias- Ordonez 2007). Females grab the base of male’s chelicerae with her chelicerae, bringing them close to her mouth and maintaining that position until mating ends (Martens 1969). The fact that females actively participate in holding and maintaining mating position suggests they have a greater control of mating duration. In fact, it was observed in these species and both P. thorellii and other gonyleptids that females are able to end mating (Pabst 1953; Martens 1969; Nazareth & Machado 2009). P. thorellii females lower their bodies, forcing males to withdraw the penis and release the chelicerae. The fact that the male and female hold each other’s chelicerae could enable a more firm and stable position during mating and such stability could explain the longer matings observed. Males could use part of the mating time for several purposes: to remove sperm from previous matings (Thomas & Zeh 1984; Eberhard 1996; Birkhead & Moller 1998), to transfer accessory substances (nutritious or inhibitory of future matings) (Parker 1970; Simmons 2001) and/or to stimulate females for longer periods (Eberhard 1998). We found that the penis in P. thorellii has spines, sensilla and other projections, such as the ventral process, that could promote penetration of 216 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY the penis, remove sperm, and/or stimulate the ovipositor during mating (Macias-Ordonez et al. 2010). However, the function of these ornaments in this and other harvestman species is still unknown. After mating, males remain near the female touching her with legs I and II; this fact could indicate the presence of Post- copulatory courtship. A similar behavior was observed in other Gonyleptidae species: in Chavesincola inexpectabilis, females oviposit immediately after mating (Nazareth & Machado 2009) and in Goniosoma spelaeiim (Mello-Leitao, 1933) and A. longipes, males stay close and approach to reinseminate the female (Gnaspini 1995; Machado & Olivera 1998). In P. thorellii, females oviposit between 30 and 40 days after mating (Stanley & Toscano-Gadea, unpublished data). Males could stay with them for long periods during which they could reinseminate them and protect the female from other males. Even though in this study we separated the couple after they moved away from each other, Stanley (2012) observed that the same couple was able to mate up to six times with a separation of 24-48 h between matings. She also observed that males may fight with one another immediately after matings. These facts could imply that both post-copulatory courtship and mate guarding could be occurring in P. thorellii. Females perform Operculum cleaning during most of the Post-copulatory stage. Due to the fact that this behavior is observed immediately after mating it is possible that females are removing and eating sperm (Pinto-da-Rocha & Giribet 2007; Macias-Ordohez et al. 2010). Females of the fly Prochyliza xanthosoma prefer males that transfer great amount of sperm, because after mating they expel part of the ejaculate and feed from it (Bonduriansky & Rowe 2003; Bonduriansky et al. 2005). If females of P. thorellii are in fact expelling sperm, this would be one more feature in favor of female control over sperm in this species. Future studies should identify and quantify the substance that the female takes to her mouth and determine if the observed behavior is related with sperm dumping or with other substances with nutritional value being transferred to females as nuptial gifts (Eberhard 1998; Arqnvist & Nilsson 2000; Bonduriansky & Rowe 2003; Elgar et al. 2003; Bonduriansky et al. 2005, Peretti & Eberhard 2009). P. thorellii seems to be a promising model in which to study the mechanisms responsible for sexual selection. This work provides the framework required for future sexual behavior research in the species. Studies involving courtship influence on mating duration and sperm use in female reproductive tract, as well as the causes promoting male fights, are already taking place. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to Fernando G. Costa for his help in capturing the individuals and for useful discussions of the original idea and results. We also thank Fernando Perez-Miles and Miguel Simo from Facultad de Ciencias, for letting us use their laboratory equipment for measuring the individuals. We also would like to thank Anita Aisenberg and J. Henderson for improving the first version of this study and revising the English. And finally we are grateful to two anonymous reviewers that constructively criticized and significantly improved this article. LITERATURE CITED Adis, J. & M.S. Harvey. 2000. How many Arachnida and Myriapoda are there world-wide and in Amazonia? Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 35:139-141. Andersson, M.B. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, New Jersey. Arnqvist, G. & T. Nilsson. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: Multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60:145-164. Birkhead, T.R. & A.P. Moller. 1998. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press. London. Blumstein, D.T., C.S. Evans & J.C. Daniel. 2000. JWatcher 0.9. Online at http://galliform.psy.mq.edu.au/jwatcher/ Bonduriansky, R. & L. Rowe. 2003. Interactions among mechanisms of sexual selection on a male body size and head shape in a sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthosoma. Evolution 57:2046-2053. Bonduriansky, R., J. Wheeler & L. Rowe. 2005. Ejaculate feeding expedites oviposition and increases female fecundity in the “waltzing fly” Prochyliza xanthosoma (Diptera: Piophilidae). Animal Behaviour 69:489^97. Buzatto, B.A., G.S. Requena, R.S. Lourengo, R. Munguia-Steyer & G. Machado. 2011. Conditional male dimorphism and alternative reproductive tactics in a Neotropical arachnid (Opiliones). Evolutionary Ecology 25:331-349. Coddington, J.A., M. Horner & E.A. Soderstrom. 1990. Mass aggregations in tropical Harvestmen (Opiliones, Gragreliidae: Prionostemma sp.). Revue Arachnologique 8:213-219. Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Eberhard, W.G. 1998. Importancia de la eleccion femenina cn'ptica para la etologi'a. Etologia 6:1-8. Elgar, M.A., F.E. Champion de Crespigny & S. Ramamurthy. 2003. Male copulation behaviour and the risk of sperm competition. Animal Behaviour 66:211-216. Elpino-Campos, A., W. Pereira, W. Del-Claro & G. Machado. 2001. Behavioural repertory and notes on natural history of the Neotropical harvestman Discocyrtus oliverioi (Opiliones: Gonylep¬ tidae). Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 12:144-150. Fowler-Finn, K.D., E. Triana & O.G. Miller. 2014. Mating in the harvestman Leiobimum vittatum (Arachnida: Opiliones): from premating struggles to solicitous tactile engagement. Behaviour 151:1663-1686.^ Giuliani, L. 2008. La familia Gonyleptidae en el Uruguay (Arachnida, Opiliones). Tesis de Licenciatura en Ciencias Biologicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay. Gnaspini, P. 1995. Reproduction and postembryonic development of Goniosoma spelaeum, a cavernicolous harvestman from southeast¬ ern Brazil (Arachnida: Opiliones: Gonyleptidae). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 28:137-151. Hammer, O., D.A.T. Harper & P.D. Ryan. 2003. Past Palae¬ ontological Software, Version 1.18. Online at http://foly.uio.no/ ohammer/past Machado, G. & R. Macias-Ordones. 2007. Reproduction. Pp. 414- 454. In Harvestmen: The Biology of Opiliones. (R. Pinto-da- Rocha, G. Machado & G. Giribet, eds.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Machado, G. & P.S. Olivera. 1998. Reproductive biology of the neotropical harvestman (Goniosoma longipes) (Arachnida, Opi¬ liones: Gonyleptidae): mating, oviposition behavior, brood mor¬ tality, and parental care. Journal of Zoology 246:359-367. Machado, G., R. Pinto-da-Rocha & G. Giribet. 2007. What are harvestmen? Pp. 1-13. In Harvestmen: The Biology of Opiliones. (Pinto-da-Rocha, R., G. Machado & G. Giribet, eds.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Machado, G., G.S. Requena, C.A. Toscano-Gadea, E. Stanley & R. Macias-Ordonez. 2015. Male and female mate choice in harvest- STANLEY ET AL.— MATING BEHAVIOR IN SOLITARY HARVESTMEN 217 men; general patterns and inferences on the underlying processes. Pp. 169-201. In Cryptic Female Choice in Arthropods. (A. Aisenberg & A.V. Peretti, eds.). Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. Maci'as-Ordonez, R. 1997. The mating system of Leiohunum vittatum Say 1821 (Arachnida: Opiliones: Palpatores); resource defense polygyny in the striped harvestman. Doctoral thesis, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. Macias-Ordofiez, R. 2000. Touchy harvestmen. Natural History 109:58-67. Maci'as-Orddnez, R., G. Machado, A. Perez-Gonzalez & J.W. Shultz. 2010. Genitalic evolution in Opiliones. Pp. 285-306. In The Evolution of Primary Sexual Characters in Animals. (J.L. Leonard & A. Cordoba-Aguilar, eds.). Oxford University Press, New York. Martens, J. 1969. Die Sekretdarbietung wahrend des Paarungsverhal- tens von Ischyropsalis C. L. Koch (Opiliones). Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie. 26:513-523. Matthiesen, F.A. 1983. Comportamento sexual de um opiliao brasileiro Discocyrtus pectinifenmr Mello Leitao, 1937 (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae). Ciencia e Cultura, 35:1339-1341. Mora, G. 1990. Parental care in a neotropical harvestman, Zygopachylus albomarginis (Arachnida: Gonyleptidae). Animal Behaviour 39:582-593. Nazareth, T.M. & G. Machado. 2009. Reproductive behavior of Chavesincola ine.xplicabilis (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae) with descrip¬ tion of a new and independently evolved case of paternal care in harvestmen. Journal of Arachnology 37:127-134. Nazareth, T.M. & G. Machado. 2010. Mating system and exclusive postzygotic paternal care in a Neotropical harvestman (Arachnida: Opiliones). Animal Behaviour 79:547-554. Pabst, W. 1953. Zur Biologie der mitteleuropiiischen Troguliden. Zoologische Jahrbuecher Abteilung fuer Systematik Oekologie und Geographie der Tiere 82:1-156. Parker, G.A. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary conse¬ quences. Biological Reviews 45:525-567. Peretti, A.V. & W.G. Eberhard. 2009. Cryptic female choice via sperm dumping favours male copulatory courtship in a spider. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23:271-281. Pinto-da-Rocha, R. & G. Giribet. 2007. Taxonomy. Pp. 88-246. In Harvestmen: The Biology of Opiliones. (P. Pinto-da-Rocha, G. Machado & G. Giribet, eds.). Harvard University Press, Cam¬ bridge. Requena, G.S. & G. Machado. 2014. Mating behavior of a Neotropical arachnid with exclusive paternal care. Acta Ethologica 17:23-30. Savory, T.H. 1938. Notes on the biology of harvestmen. Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club 1:89-94. Simmons, L.W. 2001. Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Stanley, E. 2011. Egg hiding in four harvestman species from Uruguay (Opiliones: Gonyleptidae). Journal of Arachnology 39:495-496. Stanley, E. 2012. Comportamiento sexual y estrategias reproductoras en Pachyloides thorellii (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae). Tesis de Licenciatura en Ciencias Bioldgicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay. Thomas, R.H. & D.W. Zeh. 1984. Sperm transfer and utilization strategies in arachnids: ecological and morphological constraints. Pp. 180-221. In Sperm Competition and Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. (R.L. Smith, ed.). Academic Press, New York. Tsurusaki, N. 1986. Parthenogenesis and geographic variation of sex ratio in two species of Leiobunwn (Arachnida, Opiliones). Zoological Science 3:517-532. Wilcox, D., B. Dove, D. McDavid & D. Greer. 1995. ImageTool, Version 3.0. Online at http://compdent.uthscsa.edu/dig/itdesc.html Willemart, R.H., J.P. Farine, A.V. Peretti & P. Gnaspini. 2006. Behavioral roles of the sexually dimorphic structures in the male harvestman, Phalanginin opilio (Opiliones, Phalangiidae). Journal of Zoology 84:1736-1774. Willemart, R.H., F. Osses, M.C. Chelini, R. Macias-Ordofiez & G. Machado. 2008. Sexually dimorphic legs in a neotropical harvestman (Arachnida, Opiliones): Ornament or weapon? Behav¬ ioral Processes 80:51-59. Manuscript received 22 April 2015, revised 27 January 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:218-226 The smallest known solifuge: Vempironiella aguilari^ new genus and species of sun-spider (Solifugae: Mummuciidae) from the coastal desert of Peru Ricardo Botero-Trujillo: Division Aracnologia, Museo Argentine de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Avenida Angel Gallardo 470, CP: 1405DJR, C.A.B.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mails: rbt@macn.gov.ar & pachyurus@yahoo.com Abstract. A new genus and species in the South American sun-spider family Mummuciidae, Vempironiella aguilari gen. nov., sp. nov., is herein described from a series of specimens from the coastal desert of Punta Hermosa, Peru. Vempironiella can be readily distinguished from all other known mummuciid genera, by the absence of the cheliceral movable finger MM tooth and the presence of a diastema between the RFA and RFP teeth on the fixed finger. With this description, the number of valid species of mummuciids is 19, three of which have been described from Peru. Males of V. aguilari measure 3.90-5.85 mm in total body length making it the smallest solifuge species known to date. The cheliceral morphology of V. aguilari is discussed and some hypotheses on the function of morphology are provided. Keywords: Solifuges, Punta Hermosa, Peruvian coastal desert. The South American sun-spider family Mummuciidae Roewer, 1934 encompasses small to moderate-sized species of solifuges. Traditionally, eight genera have been included in the family, namely Mummucia Simon, 1879, Gaiicha Mello- Leitao, 1924, Metacleobis Roewer, 1934, Mianinucina Roewer, 1934, Mimmnicipes Roewer, 1934, Gauchella Mello-Leitao, 1937, Cordohulgida Mello-Leitao, 1938 and Uspallata Mello- Leitao, 1938 (Harvey 2003; Bird et al. 2015). Although the catalogue of Harvey (2003) listed ten genera in the family, two of them, i.e., Miimmuciona Roewer, 1934 and Sedna Muma, 1971, had been transferred to Ammotrechidae by Maury (1982, 1987). Until recently, 20 species were recognized for Mummuciidae (Bird et al. 2015); however, two were discov¬ ered to belong to Ammotrechidae (Botero-Trujillo & luri 2015). Mummuciid species have been described mostly from Brazil and Argentina, with six and four species respectively, followed by Paraguay, Chile and Peru, each with two species, and Bolivia and Ecuador, with a single species each (Maury 1998; Xavier &. Rocha 2001; Martins et al. 2004; Rocha & Carvalho 2006; Carvalho et al. 2010; Gonzalez-Reyes & Corronca 2013; Botero-Trujillo & luri 2015). These numbers are not accurate estimators of species diversity, however, and enormous areas across the geographical distribution of the family remain unsampled (e.g., Maury 1998: fig. 4). As summarized by Harvey (2003), a few species have been allegedly recorded for more than one country [e.g., Mummucia variegata (Gervais, 1849)]. Whilst some of those correspond to rather old records [e.g., Simon’s mention of M. variegata for Peru (Simon 1879; 152)], determining the actual geographic range of species requires additional dedicated fieldwork and comprehensive efforts to delimit species. Thus far the recognition of mummuciid genera is a challenging task, for these are poorly defined (Maury 1998; Botero-Trujillo 2014), rendering the validity of some ques¬ tionable. Because of this, it is often easier to identify new species than it is to place them into a genus. As a consequence, some authors of newly-named species have opted for placing them into the type genus, Mummucia, as a conservative approach without taxonomic support (Xavier & Rocha 2001; Martins et al. 2004; Rocha & Carvalho 2006; Carvalho et al. 2010). Two genera with more than one species, Mummucia and Mummucina, have neither been revised nor had their monophyly yet demonstrated. Meanwhile, the other six genera remain monotypic. Due to this taxonomic confusion, only the study of the type species of the different genera can shed light on where a new species should be placed. In the present contribution, Vempironiella gen. nov. is created to accommodate a remarkable new species, Vempir¬ oniella aguilari sp. nov., from the coastal desert of the district of Punta Hermosa, Peru. After direct comparison with the type species of the eight former genera of Mummuciidae, the new species proved to exhibit a unique morphology that does not fit into any of the currently recognized genera, all of which are more similar to one another than any is to the new genus. Vempironiella aguilari is the smallest known solifuge, with males measuring 3.90-5.85 mm in total body length, with the second smallest being the southern African melanoblossiid Lawrencega minuta Wharton, 1981 whose males measure 5-8 mm (Bird et al. 2015). Vempironiella aguilari represents only the third mummuciid described from Peru, along with Mummucina exlineae Mello- Leitao, 1943 and Mummucina masculina Lawrence, 1954, and brings the known diversity of the family to 19 species. METHODS Terminology used for referring to cheliceral teeth and other cheliceral structures follows Bird et al. (2015). The ierm fixed finger retrofondal diastema (frfd) is here introduced to refer to a toothless diastema present between the RFP and RFA teeth. Abbreviations rlf)^ are here used to identify a set of four individual principal retrolateral finger setae, as defined by Bird et al. (2015: 173). These r If setae, which are common to all mummuciid species and are present in at least some other families (e.g., Daesiidae Kraepelin, 1899; see Bird et al. 2015: pi. 145), differ in position across mummuciid taxa (i.e., with respect to particular teeth) and bear some relevant taxonomic usefulness. Identification of individual teeth used the criteria of Bird et al. (2015: 83) for primary homology assessment of 218 BOTERO-TRUJILLO— THE SMALLEST KNOWN SOLIFUGE dentition. Leg segmentation terminology follows Shultz (1989). In line with Bird & Wharton (2015), the terms basi- and telotarsus are used for the pedipalp segments traditionally refered to as metatarsus and tarsus. The term ‘spiniform setae’ (equivalent to spine-like setae) refers to rigid, socketed macrosetae and is preferred over ‘spines’ (broadly used before by various authors), following recent works on solifuges (e.g., Botero-Trujillo 2014; Bird & Wharton 2015; Botero-Trujillo & luri 2015). The formula used to describe the pattern of spiniform setae on telotarsi of legs follows luri et al. (2014), where a dash line (-) stands for incomplete segmentation and a slash (/) for complete segmentation. Pedipalp setae terminol¬ ogy follows Cushing & Casto (2012). The ‘row of rigid hairs along the posterior margin of the post-spiracular sternite IP (4‘*’ post-genital sternite) is the same structure referred to as ‘specialized setae’ by Botero- Trujillo (2014) and as ‘comb of rigid hairs’ by Botero-Trujillo & luri (2015). Maury (1984) referred to it as “ctenidia in the form of a comb of rigid hairs”. Here the term ‘ctenidia’ is used only for the long, single-tipped (non-bifid) and flexible seta- like structures that, in the new species, are present on the 3"^^* and 4'*^ post-genital sternites. Unlike the rigid hairs which are arranged in a row, ctenidia are irregularly distributed in the sternites (Figs. 22, 23). The “variation” section deals with observations performed on the cheliceral dental pattern formula and teeth (FSD, FSM) counts (no other significant variation was observed); dental pattern formula follows that proposed by Bird et al. (2015: 67). Specimens were examined with Leica M165 C and Leica S8AP0 stereomicroscopes. Photographs were taken with a Leica DFC 290 digital camera mounted on the Leica M165 C stereomicroscope and the extended focal range images composed with Helicon Focus 6.2.2 Pro software (http:// www.heliconsoft.com/heliconsoft-products/helicon-focus/). Il¬ lustrations of the chelicerae were prepared with CorelDRAW 12 by superimposing vectors on previously obtained micro¬ graphs. Images were edited with Adobe Photoshop CS3 (10.0). Measurements, in millimeters, were obtained using an ocular micrometer fitted to a Leitz Wetzlar stereomicroscope. Some chelicerae were manipulated, after dissection, to allow full display of the dentition. Fine forceps were carefully placed between the finger mucra, as close as possible to the bases of FD and MSM teeth. The tips of the forceps were gradually separated by carefully inserting between them the tip of another set of forceps, while controlling the first forceps such that it opened only as desired, i.e., to prevent an abrupt opening that could damage the fingers. Chelicerae were opened enough to expose all the teeth, or until the muscle keeping the movable finger closed had detached. For scanning electron microscope (SEM) preparations, specimens were dissected, cleaned with a fine-bristle paintbrush followed by ultrasonication, dehydrated via 80% - 87% - 96% - 100% ethanol series, fixed to aluminum stubs, and gold-palladium coated in a VG Scientific SC 7620 mini sputter-coater. SEM micrographs were taken under high vacuum with a Philips FEI XL30 TMP. Material examined. — Specimens used in the present work belong to the following institutions: American Museum of Natural History, New York, U.S.A. (AMNH); Museo 219 Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Buenos Aires, Argentina (MACN); Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru (MUSM); Museu de Ciencias Naturais, Funda^ao Zoobotanica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (MCN); Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (MNRJ); Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France (MNHN); Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Natur- Museum, Frankfurt, Germany (SMF). Specimens of 17 of the other 18 species currently placed in Mummuciidae (all but Mummucia dubia Badcock, 1932) were examined, including type specimens of most of them. A list of material examined belonging to the type species of all other genera is provided below. Cordohulgida bnichi Mello-Leitao, 1938: female holotype (MNRJ): Labels verbatim: “Cordobuigida bnichi M. L. / Aha Gracia / Bruch leg. j 58160". “520 a-D / Leg.: Dr. C. Bruch / Aha Gracia (Cord.) / 14.xii.l934" . ARGENTINA: Cordoba, Alta Gracia, La Granja, under rocks, i.l939, C. Bruch, 2 juveniles (MACN-Ar); Cordoba, Alta Gracia, La Granja, i.l938, C. Bruch, 1 male, 1 female, 1 juvenile (MACN-Ar). Gaucha fasciata Mello-Leitao, 1924: male holotype (MNRJ, currently at MCN): Label verbatim: “Gaucha fasciata M. L. / Porto Alegre / Gliesch j 42682" . “Laboratorio de Zoologia / Solifugosj Solpugidae / Gaucha fasciata / M. Lei t do". 1 male, 2 female paratypes (MNRJ; currently at MCN): Label verbatim: “Laboratorio de Zoologia / Solifugosj Solpugidae / Gaucha fasciata / M. Leitdo". BRAZIL: Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Jardim Botanico, granito, 46 m elev., 30‘’03'13.11" S 51°10'35.18" W, 19.xi.2012'^ 3 males, 1 female (MCN-Sol-020); 03.xii.2012, 2 males, 2 juveniles (MCN-Sol-021); xii.2014, R. Ott & R. Botero Trujillo, 1 male (96% ethanol, MCN). Gaiichella stoeckeli (Roewer, 1934): 2 males, 1 female syntypes (SMF): Label verbatim: “Araclm. Coll. Roewer - Lfd. No. 2984 j Solifuga: / No. 73 / Gaucha stoeckeli n. sp. / 2(3, 19 j Bolivia, La Paz / Typus / Roewer det. 1933". Metacleobis fulvipes Roewer, 1934: male holotype (SMF): Label verbatim: “Araclm. Coll. Roewer - Lfd. No. 4556 j Solifuga: j No. 365 j Metacleobis fulvipes j 16 j u. g. u. sp. j Brasil: Mat to Grosso, Cuyabo j Typus / Roewer det. 1933" . “4756". Mummucia variegata (Gervais, 1849): 3 female syntypes (MNHN): Labels verbatim: “17849 j Mummucia varegata [sic] / Chili j Gervais / Vid. Kraep." “59.” CHILE: V Region, Valparaiso, Puente Las Bayicas, 24 km E of Algarrobo, 09. xi. 1988, E. Maury, 15 males, 1 female, 2 juveniles (MACN- Ar). Mummucina titschacki Roewer, 1934: ECUADOR: Chim¬ borazo, Road 35th, 3 km N of Riobamba, 1 km before San Andres, 100 m from “Cantera (quarry) San Andres”, 3000 m elev., 01°35'57" S 78°41'50" W, manual capture and pitfall traps (12:00 to 15:00 hs), 22-23. iii. 20 14; R. Botero Trujillo, 31 males, 3 females, 4 juveniles (MACN-Ar). Mummucipes paraguayensis Roewer, 1 934: 2 males, 1 female syntypes (SMF): Label verbatim: “Araclm. Coll. Roewer - Lfd. No. 4753 / Solifuga: j No. 362 / Mummucipes paraguayensis / 26,19 i n. g. n. sp. j Paraguay: Asuncion / Typus / Roewer det. 1933". “4753". Uspallata pulchra Mello-Leitao, 1938: ARGENTINA: Mendoza, Las Heras, 10 km N of Uspallata, 2014 m elev., 220 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 1~4. — Vempiroiiiella aguikiri gen. nov., sp. nov. 1-2. Male holotype (MACN-Ar-35453); 1. Habitus, dorsal view; 2. Prosoma, dorsal view. 3-4. Adult female paratype (MACN-Ar-35454); 3. Habitus, dorsal view; 4. Prosoma, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm (Figs. 1, 3); 0.3 mm (Fig. 2); 0.5 mm (Fig. 4). 32°32'30.8" S 69°18'22.2" W, manual capture, 22.i.2014; H.A. luri, R. Botero Trujillo, A. A. Ojanguren Affilastro, 1 female (96% ethanol, MACN-Ar). NOTE: Mello-Leitao (1938) only reported one type specimen for C. bnichi which was thus far considered lost (Kury & Nogueira 1999). One specimen, accompanied by a label in Mello-Leitao’s handwriting and with collection data matching that reported in the original description, was recently found in the collection of the MACN. Although the specimen is not accompanied by any label identifying it as a type, the morphology and wear pattern of its chelicerae (which is very particular) allowed the author to determine that it is, without a doubt, the same specimen illustrated by Mello- Leitao (1938: figs. 72, 73). Therefore, this specimen is considered to be the holotype of C. hriichi. TAXONOMY Family Mummuciidae Roewer, 1934 Vempiroiiiella gen. nov. Type species. — Veiupironiella aguikiri sp. nov. Etymology. — The generic name is an arbitrary combination of letters that resembles the word “vampire” inspired by the shape of the cheliceral teeth which are reminiscent of the fangs of vampires. Feminine in gender. Diagnosis. — A member of the family Mummuciidae because of having a three-dark-band pattern on the opisthosomal dorsal surface (Figs. 1, 3), a row of rigid hairs along the posterior margin of post-spiracular sternite II (4**’ post-genital sternite), lacking spiniform setae on pedipalps (Fig. 16), and the male flagellum of the composite type, retrolaterally compressed with ipsilateral opening, and immovably attached to the cheliceral fixed finger (Figs. 12, 13) (Maury 1984; Bird et al. 2015; Botero-Trujillo & luri 2015). The new genus differs from all other genera in the family in various aspects, mostly of its cheliceral morphology: i) Fixed finger with retrofondal diastema (frfd) between the RFA tooth and the RFP tooth (intermediate retrofondal teeth absent) (Figs. 5, 6). ii) Movable finger with MP and MSM teeth only, MM tooth absent (Figs. 7, 11). Hi) Movable finger MSM tooth markedly pronounced and columnar (Figs. 7-11). iv) Movable finger of female aculeus-like, with very long and slender mucron, and teeth located in a noticeably basal position on the finger (Figs. 5, 7). v) Movable finger of female with mucron cylindrical, retrolateral carina obsolete (represented by shallow granules on the base of finger and edge carina on the apex), and gnathal edge carina identified only by a sclerotized line along the mucron dorsal margin (Figs. 5, 7). vi) Opisthosomal lateral pleural membranes, sub-dorsal dark bands with white marks surrounding the insertion socket of some setae, instead of similar but black marks on the sub-ventral whitish bands of the membrane. Comparisons. — All other eight genera currently recognized in the family, most importantly their type species, differ substantially from the above description by: i) Cheliceral fixed finger retrofondal teeth series is uninterrupted, without diastema, ii) Movable finger with MP, MSM and MM teeth present. Hi) Movable finger MSM tooth small to moderately pronounced and sub-triangular, iv) Movable finger mucron of female moderately long and more robust than that of VempiroiHella, with teeth located in a sub-medial position on the finger, v) Movable finger of female with retrolateral carina moderately to densely granular and gnathal edge carina identified by pronounced angle formed by adjacent surfaces, which gives the appearance of a cutting edge along the mucron. vi) Opisthosomal lateral pleural membranes, sub- ventral whitish bands with black marks, and not the other way around, except for Mummucina in strict o sensu (i.e., M. BOTERO-TRUJILLO— THE SMALLEST KNOWN SOLIFUGE 221 Figures 5-6. — Vempironiella agidlari gen. nov., sp. nov. Schematic representation of the cheliceral morphology in retrolateral aspect. 5. Female and juvenile morphology; 6; Male morphology. Abbreviations; RFP, RFA, FP, FM, FD, particular fixed finger teeth for reference; MP, MSM, movable finger teeth; r{fi_4, set of four principal retrolateral finger setae; Fgl, flagellum; sa, setose areas; MRLC, movable finger retrolateral edge carina; FRLC, fixed finger retrolateral edge carina; frfd, fixed finger retrofondal diastema. Scale bars: 0.25 mm (Fig. 5); 0.1 mm (Fig. 6). titschacki) which shares the pattern described above for Vempironiella. Vempironiella aguilari sp. nov. Figures 1-23; Table 1 Mummucia variegata (misidentification): Aguilar 1977: 91 [as Mumnnicia variegata (?)”]. Type material. — Holotype male: PERU: Lima, Lima, Punta Hermosa, “40 km S of Lima”, 03. xi. 1974, P. Aguilar (MACN- Ar-35453). Paratypes: PERU: same data of holotype, 12 males, 2 females, 2 juveniles (MACN-Ar-35454), 1 male, 1 juvenile (AMNH), 1 male, 1 juvenile (MUSM). All specimens preserved in 80% ethanol. Etymology. — The species is named after the prominent Peruvian Biologist, Dr. Pedro G. Aguilar Fernandez (1926- 2013). Doctor Aguilar Fernandez was the collector of the type material and, in one of his 1977’s publications, presented some information about the natural history of this species. Diagnosis. — As for genus. Description of male. — Meristic data in Table 1. Color: (Figs. 1, 2). On 80% ethanol-preserved specimens. General coloration yellow with iridescent white areas. Propeltidium with yellow central area, longer than wide, and two yellow areas on posterior margin, all forming an arrow¬ like design that is surrounded by white pigment; ocular tubercle yellowish-brown, except for the border of the eyes which is black. Chelicerae manus yellow, ornamented with longitudinal white bands which fuse together on the distalmost region of the setose area; fingers yellow, translucent. Meso-, metapeltidium, and dorsal surface of opisthosoma with a three-dark-band design typical of the family: tergites with median, longitudinal light brown band, and paired lateral white bands; lateral pleural membranes with sub-dorsal dark- brown and sub-ventral white bands; dark bands of opistho- somal pleural membrane with white marks surrounding the insertion socket of some setae; sternites immaculately irides¬ cent white. Ventral aspect of prosoma, legs and pedipalps uniformly yellow, with hint of iridescence; sternum lighter than coxae. Malleoli yellow, translucent. Prosoma: (Fig. 2). Propeltidium wider than long; with bifurcated setae of variable size, the longest setae arranged in a bilaterally symmetrical distribution on propeltidium; anterior margin procurved, with ocular tubercle elevated; complete and shallow median longitudinal furrow present; anterolateral propeltidial lobes separated from the propeltidium principal shield by incomplete lateral groove. Meso- and metapeltidium wider than long, with bifurcated setae of variable size. Coxae densely covered with bifurcated setae; some of which are longer and exhibit a bilateral symmetrical distribution, and one or two other long single-tipped setae present at least on coxae HI. Sternum glabrous. Clielicera-dentition and processes: (Figs. 6, 11-15). Fixed finger with median teeth series comprising all primary teeth, i.e., FP, FM, FD, markedly pronounced and columnar; secondary teeth arranged in two (FSM and FSD) categories, similar to principal teeth but slightly shorter; retrofondal teeth series comprising RFA, RFP and RFSP teeth only, interrupt¬ ed by retrofondal diastema (frfd) between the RFA and RFP teeth; RFA and RFP larger than RFSP, both similar to teeth of median series; profondal teeth series with three teeth (PFSP, PFP, PFM); PFM tooth visible in retrolateral aspect through the frfd. Movable finger with median teeth series comprising only two teeth, markedly pronounced and erect MP, and pronounced and columnar MSM, arranged as MP>>MSM; teeth placed in a sub-basal, rather than medial, position on the finger. Movable finger without any trace of MM tooth and without subproximal (MSP) or subterminal (MST) teeth; retrolateral carina incomplete and obsolete, consisting of one or two low granules basal to MP tooth, and keel-like section JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY 222 Figures 7-10. — Vempiroiiiella agidkiri gen. nov., sp. nov. SEM images. Juvenile (presumably subadult) and adult female paratypes (MACN- Ar-35454). 7. Juvenile, right chelicera, retrolateral aspect; 8. Adult female, left chelicera, retrolateral aspect; 9. Juvenile, right chelicera, prolateral aspect; 10. Juvenile, right chelicera, apex of movable finger mucron, retrolateral aspect (gnathal edge carina indicated by white arrows; retrolateral edge carina indicated by black arrow). Scale bars: 0.25 mm (Figs. 7-9); 50pm (Fig. 10). (i.e., retrolateral edge carina) evident only on the apical region of the mucron. Closure of FP tooth distal to MP. Fixed finger with prodorsal carina complete (along the entire length of the asetose area), starting approximately at level of the attachment point of the flagellum and of RFA tooth, predominantly straight, without angular dorsal crest; proventral carina long, starting approximately at level of FM tooth and present in the entire mucron area; mucron long and slender, ventral margin gently curved, without subterminal flange (STF), apex (FT tooth) ventrally curved. Movable finger mucron very long and slender, with obsolete gnathal edge carina, identified by subtle angle formed by adjacent surfaces. Chelicera-setose areas and strididatory plate: (Figs. 6, 1 1- 15). Retrolateral and dorsal surfaces with abundant bifurcated retrolateral manus {rim) and retrolateral finger (;7/) setae, of different sizes; some of these setae are arranged in a bilaterally symmetrical pattern, including four evident principal retro¬ lateral finger (jyrincipal rlf) setae, i.e., /7//_/, with distribution in the fixed finger as shown in Fig. 6. Prolateral surface with array of setal types, as follows: proventral distal {pvd) setae consisting of (apparently) two rows of plumose setae, the ventral reaching the level of the fondal interdigital articular membrane {fiam) and the dorsal reaching the prolateral interdigital condyle (pic)', proventral subdistal setae made up of few thick and blunt setae {pvsd comb) at level of the stridulatory apparatus, and a few others, thinner, in more distal position {pvsd)\ carpet-like field of sparse barbed and bristle-like promedial {pm) setae, covering the distalmost quarter of manus. Stridulatory plate slightly longer than high, occupying most of manus, dorso-apically with a six-ridged stridulatory apparatus (variability in ridge number was not measured). Prolateral setose area of movable finger with setal insertions reaching the level of MP tooth; movable finger prodorsal (mpd) setal series consisting of plumose setae arranged in one staggered row or two rows, followed by sparse setae of different length and thickness corresponding to the movable finger promedial (mpm) and proventral (mpv) setal series, the distalmost setae of each of which is longer. Flagellum: (Figs. 6, 11-14). A thin, translucent, membra¬ nous structure immovably attached prodorsally to the fixed finger; ipsilateral opening present. General aspect drop-like, moderately inflated and narrowing anteriorly; ventral margin sinuous. Visible (prolateral) surface almost smooth, with very sparse minute spicules, barely identifiable along regions of prodorsal margin; apex without visible spicules; apex of the flagellum reaching about midway between the apex of the mucron and FD tooth. BOTERO-TRUJILLO— THE SMALLEST KNOWN SOLIFUGE 223 Figures !1-15. — Vempironiella aguilari gen. nov., sp. nov. SEM images. Male paratypes (MACN-Ar-35454). 11. Right chelicera, retrolateral aspect (broken FD tooth indicated by arrow); 12. Right chelicera, prolateral aspect (broken FD tooth indicated); 13. Right chelicera, flagellum, prolateral aspect; 14. Left chelicera, fixed finger, proventral aspect (retrofondal diastema indicated by arrow); 15. Ibid., retroventral aspect. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (Figs. 11, 13, 14); 0.25 mm (Fig. 12); 50 pm (Fig. 15). Pedipalp: (Figs. 16-18). Segments robust, all coated with bifurcated setae {sensu Cushing & Casto 2012) of different sizes; femur, basitarsus, and especially tibia with ventral set of very long setae, some of them longer than tibia; clubbed setae {sensu Cushing & Casto 2012) only present on basi- and telotarsus; spiniform setae absent. Randomly distributed slit sensilla present at least on tibia, basi- and telotarsus. Leg I: (Fig. 1). Similar to pedipalp with respect to the types, density and distribution of setae; with neither claws nor spiniform setae. Slit sensilla, if present, could not be identified. Walking legs: (Fig. 1). Covered with abundant small- to medium-sized bifurcated setae, and a few longer setae. Legs II and III: tibia and basitarsus with array of pro- and retroventral rows of spiniform setae; on basitarsus apparently a row of three proventral, row of three retroventral, and one distal subventral spiniform setae, in a 2.2.3 pattern; telotarsus bi-segmented with pro- and retroventral rows of spiniform setae, each apparently with five and three, respectively, in a 1.1. 2/2. 2 pattern. Leg IV: Tibia with row of three/four spiniform setae on proventral surface and single distal spiniform seta on retroventral surface; basitarsus apparently with row of four provental and one distal retroventral spiniform setae, in a 1.1. 1.2 pattern; telotarsus bi-segmented with incomplete (ventral) segmentation on first (basal) tarsomere, with pro- and retroventral rows of six spiniform setae each, in a 2. 2. 2-2/2. 2 pattern. Opisthosoma: (Figs. 1, 20-23). Tergites with abundant bifurcated setae of variable size. Sternites with several bifurcated setae. Ctenidia present on 3'^'^ and 4”’ post-genital sternites (post-spiracular sternites I and II); ctenidia filiform and setae-like, similar in thickness to the bifid setae, but distinguishable because ctenidia are longer, single-tipped (non¬ bifid), and flexible; ctenidia similar in the two sternites. Post- spiracular sternite II with row of rigid hairs along posterior margin. Two pairs of microsetae, of the same type reported by luri et al. (2014) and Botero-Trujillo (2014), present in the posterior half of the genital plate, and 2"*^ post-genital sternites (spiracular sternites); one of these microsetae is also present on each side of post-spiracular sternite I (these could not be seen in other sternites due to dense setation). Female. — Meristic data in Table 1. Figs. 3-5, 7-10. Similar to male but larger and more robust; propeltidium wider. Ctenidia present in the same sternites and similar to those of male. Chelicera without the sexual specializations of males. Fixed and movable fingers very sharp, with sharp teeth. Fixed finger dorsal surface more elevated than manus, evidently curved on lateral aspect and without dorsal crest; fixed finger highest elevation at level of mucron. Movable finger mucron aculeus-like, with teeth located in a noticeably basal position on the finger; mucron cylindrical; vestigial retrolateral carina present on basal third of finger (where granulose) and on the apex (i.e., retrolateral edge carina); gnathal edge carina 224 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figures 16-23. — Vempiroiiiella cigiiilari gen. nov., sp. nov. SEM images. Male paratypes (MACN-Ar-35454). 16. Right pedipalp, prolateral aspect; 17. Ibid., detail of telotarsus; 18. Tip of clubbed seta on pedipalp telotarsus; 19. Leg IV malleoli; 20. Genital plate; 21. Pair of microsetae on genital plate; 22. Post-spiracular sternite I (arrows indicate some ctenidia); 23. Post-spiracular sternite II (arrows indicate some ctenidia). Scale bars: 0.5 mm (Fig. 16); 0.1 mm (Figs. 17, 19, 20, 22-23); 5 pm (Fig. 18); 10 pm (Fig. 21). obsolete, not elevated and identified only by a sclerotized line along the mucron dorsal margin. Variation. — Dental pattern formula: In females and juve¬ niles: FD-(l-2)-FM-(i-2)-FP-(lRFA, IRFP, IRFSP); in males: FD-(i-2)-FM-(l)-FP-(l RFA, IRFP, IRFSP). Number of teeth on the FSD secondary teeth category: Males: n (chelicerae) = 24; 21 with one, 3 with two FSD; females: n = 4; 4 with two FSD. Number of teeth on the FSM secondary teeth category: Males: n (chelicerae) = 24; 24 with one FSM; females: n = 4; 2 with one, 2 with two FSM. Notes. — Resulting from a year-round (1974-1975) ecologi¬ cal study of the arthropod fauna of the Tillandsial of Punta Hermosa, Aguilar (1977: 91) reported V. agiiilari [as ''Mum- miicia variegata (?)”] as the most abundant arachnid species. Aguilar (1977) did not mention if the specimens were to be deposited in a collection; however, he specified that some arachnid samples from his study had been sent to Dr. M. E. Galiano, formerly at the MACN where the material herein referred was found. The information contained in the label with the specimens accurately indicates that these are from Aguilar’s survey of the spring of 1974 (September to November). According to Aguilar (1977: fig. 4), around 40 specimens of only that solifuge species were captured in that season, while other, about 190 specimens were captured during the rest of the year (mostly in summer). So far, only the specimens here referred are known to be deposited in a formal collection, the rest remain unlocated. Even though V. aguilari appeared to be, back then, fairly abundant throughout the year, a two-day survey to the type locality conducted by the author in early March 2014, aimed at collecting additional material of this species, was unsuc¬ cessful. Whether the population density might have decreased, or which variables might be related to the species not having been found, cannot be determined at this time. Habitat. — The coastal-desert area where V. aguilari was collected is characterized by the presence of the xerophyte Tillandsia latifolia (Bromeliaceae) (Aguilar 1977). BOTERO-TRUJILLO— THE SMALLEST KNOWN SOLIFUGE 225 Table 1. — Meristic data for Vempironiella aguilari gen. nov., sp. nov. Measurements in millimeters for male and female. L = length; W = width; H = height. 'Measured along medial axis, from the propeltidium anterior margin to the opisthosoma posterior margin. “Measured in dorsal view at widest point. '’Measured in retrolateral view parallel to longitudinal axis of chelicera, from the fixed finger apex to anterolateral propeltidial lobe anterior margin. "’Measured in retrolateral view, along vertical axis at widest part of manus. ^Sum of individual segment lengths. ^Measurement excludes claws. * Range for males (n = 15). ** Measurement unavailable (legs IV absent). Male holotype (MACN-Ar-35453) Female paratype ( adult ) (MACN-Ar-35454) Total body L: With chelicerae: 5.72 (holotype) [3.90 - 5.85] * 8.11 w/o chelicerae;' 4.66 (holotype) [3.19-4.79] * 5.72 Propeltidium: L: 0.90 1.57 W:2 1.00 2.10 Chelicera: L:' 1.23 2.83 W:2 0.43 0.97 H:"* 0.37 0.97 Pedipalp total L;^ 3.37 5.33 Femur L: 1.17 1.83 Tibia L: 1.00 1.67 Tibia W:^ 0.23 0.42 Basitarsus -t- 1.20 1.83 telotarsus L: Leg I total L:^ 2.70 4.11 Patella L; 0.90 1.17 Tibia L: 0.82 1.30 Basitarsus L: 0.58 0.97 Telotarsus L: 0.40 0.67 Leg IV total L 4.57 ** (w/o claws):^ Patella L: 1.50 ** Tibia L: 1.37 ** Basitarsus L: 1.03 ** Telotarsus L: ^ 0.67 ** DISCUSSION The cheliceral morphology of Vempironiella aguilari is challenging to interpret, especially that of the movable finger. Bird et al. (2015) consider in corollary 1 of their structural criterion of homology that secondary teeth are more likely to be absent than primary teeth. On the other hand, corollary 2 argues that teeth are more prone to be absent the more distal its position is on the finger (except within secondary teeth categories where the opposite can be true). The chelicerae of V. aguilari bear only two teeth on the movable finger, the proximal of which is larger than the distal. In interpreting this dentition pattern in the light of the corollaries of Bird et al. (2015), it could be argued that it is the MSM tooth which is absent, the smallest tooth on the movable finger of this species corresponding to MM. Three things suggest, however, that this is not the case and that it is the MM tooth which is indeed absent. First, in all known mummuciid species, the MM tooth closes just slightly proximal to its serial homolog on the fixed finger, FM; therefore if MM is presumed to be present in V. aguilari, then its closure with respect to FM would deviate from that pattern considering that the two teeth would be well distant when the fingers are closed. In addition, the two teeth on the movable finger of V. aguilari are placed in a clearly basal position on the finger, while the finger mucron is very long. If compared with other species in the family, it is reasonable to consider that it was the absence of MM tooth, instead of the MSM, which makes the mucron of this species that long as compared to the whole finger length. The absence of MM tooth would also more easily explain why the teeth are placed in a basal instead of median position on the finger, the latter being more widely distributed across mummuciid taxa. Likewise, the anterior-most tooth on the movable finger of V. aguilari is considerably smaller than MP, as it most frequently happens with MSM and MP teeth, respectively, throughout the order (Bird et al. 2015). Although the former tooth is indeed much more developed compared to the MSM of other species in family Mummuciidae, it is similar in size to the secondary teeth of the fixed finger, and therefore the hypothesis that it is the MSM tooth remains feasible. The frfd in the chelicerae of V. aguilari involves the absence of retrofondal teeth (including RFM). This diastema, which is present in adults of both sexes as well as in juveniles, is to our knowledge not shared with any other described solifuge. The frfd is unlikely to be homologous to the fondal notch of many male eremobatids, the later of which is situated immediately proximal to the FP tooth, whereas the frfd is proximal to RFA. The frfd is not either considered homologous to the medial notch of some other families (e.g., Solpugidae), since such diastema is situated between FM and FSM and does not involve the lack of teeth (Bird et al. 2015). The shape of the chelicerae of solifuges has been proposed to be associated with dietary preferences and burrowing abilities (Van der Meijden et al. 2012; Bird et al. 2015). For instance, species with multidentate chelicerae are presumed to be especially successful at hunting small, fast-running prey, at the cost of lower force as compared to species with robust chelicerae (Bird et al. 2015). The chelicerae of V. aguilari are neither multidentate nor especially robust, and these might also be associated with feeding and burrowing adaptations. The long and delicate shape of the fingers of V. aguilari suggests that these solifuges are not especially adapted for burrowing or that they burrow in soft substrates (e.g., loose- sand removal instead of hard-substrate excavation). In contrast, it is possible that the long, sharp aculeus-like movable finger can serve as a “killing weapon” that easily penetrates soft-bodied animals or articular membranes. In addition, the large size of the MP tooth might grant these animals the ability to break small, hard-shelled preys (e.g., ants), or to prevent them from escaping, for instance, by crushing them or keeping them trapped against the frfd. These hypotheses, however, have not yet been confirmed with live animals and direct observations will be necessary. The cheliceral morphology of V. aguilari is remarkable and very different from that of most species in the family. Interestingly, there is some resemblance between the chelicerae of this species and that of M. mauryi (see Xavier & Rocha 2001). In both, the chelicerae are slender with finger tips sharp. 226 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY the movable finger mucron is long and delicate, and the fixed finger highest elevation in female is at level of the mucron. These resemblances probably result from independent adap¬ tations in two distant taxa. As for the two other Peruvian species, M. exlineae and M. masculina, neither is assignable to the new genus and their systematic position remains to be determined. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is thankful to Mariajose Deza (and her family) and Diana Silva Davila for their assistance during his 2014 trip to Punta Hermosa and visit to the MUSM collection, respectively. Andres A. Ojanguren Affilastro and Hernan Augusto luri have contributed to several discussions regarding the author’s ongoing project on Mummuciidae. Thanks to Tharina L. Bird for some useful opinions about the cheliceral teeth of the new species. Additional thanks are due to Martin J. Ramirez, Daniel N. Proud, AAOA and HAI for performing reviews on an earlier version of the manuscript, and to the anonymous referees of the submitted version, all of whom provided valuable feedback. Thanks also to the curators of institutional collections who loaned (or otherwise facilitated access to) the specimens used during the present study and listed in the text: Peter Jager (SMF), Mark Judson (MNHN), Adriano B. Kury (MNRJ) and Ricardo Ott (MCN). The author is supported by a Doctoral Fellowship associated with PICT 2011-01007 from the “Fondo para la Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica-FONCyT”, Argentina. Financial support was received from PICT 2010-1764 to AAOA and PICT 2001-1007 and PIP 2012-0943 to MJR. LITERATURE CITED Aguilar F., P.G. 1977. Fauna desertico-costera Peruana — IV: Artropodos del Tillandsial de Punta Hermosa, Lima (Peru). Revista Peruana de Entomologia 20:87-92. Bird, T.L. & R.A. Wharton. 2015. Description of a new solifuge Mehmoblossia aiisie sp. n. (Solifugae, Melanoblossiidae) with notes on the setiform flagellar complex of Melanoblossiinae Roewer, 1934. African Invertebrates 56:515-525. Bird, T.L., R. Wharton & L. Prendini. 2015. Cheliceral morphology in Solifugae (Arachnida): primary homology, terminology and character survey. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 394:1-355. Botero-Trujillo, R. 2014. Redescription of the sun-spider Mummucina litschacki Roewer, 1934 (Solifugae, Mummuciidae) with notes on the taxonomy of the genus. Zootaxa 3884:319-332. Botero-Trujillo, R. & H.A. luri. 2015. Chileotrecha romero (Kraus, 1966) comb. nov. and Pseudocleobis patagonicus (Roewer, 1934) comb. nov. transferral from Mummuciidae to Ammotrechidae (Arachnida, Solifugae). Zootaxa 3990:437^43. Carvalho, L.S., D.F. Candiani, A.B. Bonaldo, L. Suesdek & P.R.R Silva. 2010. A new species of the sun-spider genus Mimmmcia (Arachnida: Solifugae: Mummucidae) from Piaui, northeastern Brazil. Zootaxa 2690:19-31. Cushing, P.E. & P. Casto. 2012. Preliminary survey of the setal and sensory structures on the pedipalps of camel spiders (Arachnida: Solifugae). Journal of Arachnology 40:123-127. Gonzalez- Reyes, A.X. & J.A. Corronca. 2013. A new Solifugae species of Mummucina Roewer, 1934 (Solifugae, Mummuciidae) from the northwest of Argentina. Zootaxa 3737:538-544. Harvey, M.S. 2003. Catalogue of the Smaller Arachnid Orders of the World: Amblypygi, Uropygi, Schizomida, Palpigradi, Ricinulei and Solifugae. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Austra¬ lia. luri, H.A., M.A. Iglesias & A. A. Ojanguren-Affilastro. 2014. A new species of Chileotrecha Maury, 1987 (Solifugae: Ammotrechidae) from Argentina with notes on the genus. Zootaxa 3827:20-30. Kury, A.B. & A.L.C. Nogueira. 1999. Annotated check list of type specimens of Arachnida in the Museu Nacional-Rio de Janeiro. I. Scorpiones, Pseudoscorpiones and Solifugae. Publicagoes Avulsas do Museu Nacional 77:1-19. Martins, E.G., V. Bonato, G. Machado, R. Pinto-da-Rocha & L.S. Rocha. 2004. Description and ecology of a new species of sun spider (Arachnida: Solifugae) from the Brazilian Cerrado. Journal of Natural History 38:2361-2375. Maury, E.A. 1982. SohTugos de Colombia y Venezuela (Solifugae, Ammotrechidae). Journal of Arachnology 10:123-143. Maury, E.A. 1984. Las familias de sohTugos Americanos y su distribucion geografica (Arachnida, Solifugae). Physis (Buenos Aires), secc. C 42(103):73-80. Maury, E.A. 1987 (1985). Consideraciones sobre algunos sohTugos de Chile (Solifugae: Ammotrechidae, Daesiidae). Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina 44:419^32. Maury, E.A. 1998. Solifugae. Pp. 560-568. In Biodiversidad de Artropodos Argentinos. (J.J. Morrone, S. Coscardn, eds.). Ediciones SUR, La Plata, Argentina. Mello-Leitao, C. 1938. SohTugos de Argentina. Anales del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” 40:1-32. Rocha, L.S. & M.C. Carvalho. 2006. Description and ecology of a new solifuge from Brazilian Amazonia (Arachnida, Solifugae, Mummuciidae). Journal of Arachnology 34:163-169. Shultz, J.W. 1989. Morphology of locomotor appendages in Arachnida: evolutionary trends and phylogenetic implications. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 7:1-56. Simon, E. 1879. Essai d’une classification des Galeodes, remarques synonymiques et description d’especes nouvelles ou mal connues. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, Series 5:93-154. Van der Meijden, A., F. Langer, R. Boistel, P. Vagovic & M. Heethoff. 2012. Functional morphology and bite performance of raptorial chelicerae of camel spiders (Solifugae). Journal of Experimental Biology 215:3411-3418. Xavier, E. & L.S. Rocha. 2001. Autoecology and description of Mummucia mauryi (Solifugae, Mummuciidae), a new solifuge from Brazilian semi-arid Caatinga. Journal of Arachnology 29:127-134. Manuscript received 12 February 2016, revised 28 March 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:227-234 The first New World species of the pseudoscorpion family Feaellidae (Pseudoscorpiones: Feaelloidea) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest Mark S, Harvey’, Renata Andrade^ and Ricardo Pinto-da-Rocha^: 'Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, WA 6986, Australia. Research Associate: Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, 79th Street at Central Park West, New York, New York 10024-5192, USA. Research Associate: Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California 94103-3009 USA. Adjunct: School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia. School of Natural Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027, Australia. E-mail: mark.harvey@museum.wa.gov.au; “Terradentro Estudos Ambientais, Caixa Postal 5367, 31011-970, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. ^Depto de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociencias, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua do Matao, travessa 14, 321, 05508-900, Sao Paulo SP, Brazil Abstract. The first American species of the pseudoscorpion family Feaellidae is named from specimens collected in the Atlantic Rainforest biome of southern Brazil. The lack of specialized setae on the movable chela! finger suggests that it belongs to a new genus and new species, which we name Iporaugellci gen. nov. and Iporcmgella orchama sp. nov., respectively. The only known population of /. orchama is located near Iporanga, Sao Paulo, and juveniles of an unidentified species are recorded from llha da Queimada Grande. Keywords: New genus, new species, Brazil, Serra do Mar, Feaellci, morphology Members of the pseudoscorpion family Feaellidae can be instantly recognized by their raptorial pedipalps with oppos¬ ing processes on the trochanter and femur, large teeth on the chela, including some facing prolaterally, and two, four or six tubercles on the anterior margin of the carapace (e.g., Ellingsen 1906; Chamberlin 1931; Beier 1932, 1955, 1966; Harvey 1992, 2013). Feaellidae is one of the smallest pseudoscorpion families with only a single recognized genus, Feaella Ellingsen, 1906, and 12 described Recent species from Africa, the Indian region, the Seychelles Islands and north¬ western Australia (Harvey 2013), as well as a recently discovered fossil species from Eocene Baltic amber deposits (Henderickx & Boone 2014). A second genus has been found in southeast Asian caves which differs from Feaella in several ways including the morphology of the coxal region which is highly modified (Harvey unpublished data; M. Judson, in litt.). The genus Feaella is divided into three subgenera: F. (Feaella) for those species with six anterior carapaceal lobes, F. (Tetrafeaella) with four lobes, and F. (Difeaella) with two lobes (Beier 1955, 1966; Harvey 2013). An alternative generic classification was developed in an unpublished Ph.D. thesis by Mark Judson (1992) and will be published in his forthcoming review of the family. The first record of an American feaellid was made by Andrade (2003) who reported specimens from the Serra do Mar ecoregion of the Atlantic Forest biome in southern Brazil. The Atlantic Forest region has been heavily cleared and is now highly fragmented, although the Serra do Mar ecoregion is the most intact of the Atlantic Forest (Ribeiro et al. 2009). The Serra do Mar is listed as Critical/Endangered by the World Wildlife Fund (http://www.worldwildlife.org/ ecoregions/nt0160; accessed 7 January 2016). The specimens reported by Andrade (2003) are the subject of the present study, and are found to differ from other feaellids in the lack of specialized setae on the movable chelal finger. This difference is sufficient to warrant the formation of a new genus to accommodate the new species. We also record a population of the same genus from a nearby island, llha da Queimada Grande. These specimens cannot be identified to species level due to the lack of adult specimens. The discovery of members of the family Feaellidae raises the number of pseudoscorpion families recorded from South America to 20, with only six families - Pseudogarypidae, Hyidae, Neobisiidae, Parahyidae, Larcidae and Sternophor- idae - absent or not yet discovered from the region (Harvey 2013). METHODS The specimens examined during this study are lodged in the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo (MZSP), and the Instituto Butantan, Sao Paulo (IBSP). They were examined by preparing temporary slide mounts by immersing the specimen in 75% lactic acid at room temperature for one to several days, and mounting them on microscope slides with 10 or 12 mm coverslips supported by small sections of nylon fishing line. Specimens were examined with a Leica MZ16 dissecting microscope, a Leica DM2500 or Olympus BH-2 compound microscope, and illustrated with the aid of a drawing tube. Measurements were taken in mm at the highest possible magnification using an ocular graticule. After study the specimens were rinsed in water and returned to 75% ethanol with the dissected portions placed in 12X3 mm glass genitalia microvials (BioQuip Products, Inc.). Some specimens (which have since been lost) were examined using a ZEISS DSM 940 scanning electron microscope located in the “Laboratorio de Microscopia Eletronica da Universidade de Sao Paulo”. Terminology and mensuration largely follow Chamberlin (1931), with the exception of the nomenclature of the 227 228 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY pedipalps, legs and with some minor modifications to the terminology of the trichobothria (Harvey 1992), chelicera (Harvey & Edward 2007; Judson 2007) and faces of the appendages (Harvey et al. 2012). SYSTEMATICS Family Feaellidae Ellingsen, 1906 Genus Ipomngella gen. nov. http://zoobank.org/?lsid=urn:lsid;zoobank. org:act:C15233BC-C02E4798-948A-8A992C94712E Type species. — Iporcmgella orchama sp. nov. Diagnosis. — Iporangella differs from all other feaellids by the lack of specialized setae on the retrolateral face of the movable chelal finger. Description. — Adult: most setae short, inconspicuous, slight¬ ly curved and acuminate. Chelicera (Fig. 4D): hand with 5 large and several small setae; is and Is adjacent to each other; movable finger with 1 subdistal seta; with 2 dorsal and 1 ventral lyrifissures; rallum of 1 long, slender blade (Fig. 4E); lamina exterior absent; movable finger short. Pedipalp (Figs. 2H, 4F): trochanter with prolateral conical protuberance, femur without prolateral process, chela tubular. Fixed chelal finger and hand with 8 trichobothria, movable chelal finger with 4 trichobothria (Fig. 4G): esb and est situated midway on retrolateral face; ib, isb and ist situated basally in straight row; eb and it situated subdistally, very close to each other; et situated distally, much closer to diploid trichobothrium (dt) than to it; dt situated distally; st situated sub-basally; t slightly closer to sb than to b. Movable chelal finger without specialized setae. Venom apparatus absent. Chelal teeth large and diastemodentate. Carapace (Figs. 1C, 2D, 2E, 4A): anterior margin with 2 broad lobes; with 2 pairs of eyes situated on tubercles away from anterior carapaceal margin; all eyes with tapetum; with posterior furrow; without postero-lateral processes. Coxal region (Figs. 21, 4B): median maxillary lyrifissure situated basally near clivus; posterior maxillary lyrifissure absent. Coxa I without depression, each with 1 small coxal spine, situated basally (Fig. 4C); coxa II without coxal spines. Legs (Fig. 5A): patellae with shallow dorsal depression; femora III and IV shorter than patellae III and IV; femora III and IV not solidly fused with patellae III and IV, respectively; metatarsi and tarsi fused; subterminal tarsal setae acuminate; sub-ungual spine present; arolium slightly shorter than claws. Abdomen (Figs. I A, IB, ID, 2A-C ): very broad, nearly circular; tergite XI and sternite XI fused (Fig. 3F); tergite XII and sternite XII (anal sclerites) strongly sclerotized; tergite XII with 2 setae; anal region with raised circular rim. Sternite II of female absent (Fig. 5C); sternite III of male and female slender (Figs. 5B, 5C). Pleural membrane with numerous sclerotized pleural platelets in two rows (Figs. ID, 3G), most platelets with a single seta. Genitalia: details not visible. Tritonympb: Pedipalp: fixed chelal finger with 7 major trichobothria, plus diploid trichobothria (dt), movable chelal finger with 3 trichobothria (Fig. 4H); isb and sb absent; esb and est situated midway on retrolateral face; ib and ist situated basally; eb and it situated medially; et situated closer to diploid trichobothrium (dt) than to it; dt situated distally; t situated closer to st than to b; movable finger without specialized setae. Carapace: with 2 anterior lobes; with 2 pairs of eyes. Protonymph: Pedipalp: Fixed chelal finger with 2 major trichobothria, eb and ist, plus a single trichobothrium {dt); movable chelal finger with 1 trichobothrium, t (Fig. 41); movable finger without specialized setae. Carapace: with 2 anterior lobes; with 2 pairs of eyes. Remarks. — The new genus most closely resembles Feaella (Difeaella) krugeri Beier, 1966 from South Africa, the only species currently included in the subgenus Difeaella, due to the presence of two lobes on the anterior margin of the carapace, and the lack of a basal prolateral process on the pedipalpal femur (Beier 1966). Iporangella orchama differs from all other feaellids, including F. (D.) krugeri, by the lack of specialized setae on the retrolateral face of the movable chelal finger. Although the presence of these setae was not mentioned in the original description by Beier (1966), they were reported by Judson (1992). Iporangella orchama further differs from F. (D.) krugeri by the location of the trichobothria: ist is situated basal to esb in F. krugeri (Beier 1966, fig. 5), but is distal to esb in Iporangella (Fig. 4G). Etymology. — The generic epithet is derived from the type locality Iporanga, which is a municipality in Sao Paulo. The name comes from the Brazilian Indian language Tupi and means ‘beautiful river’. The generic name is feminine in gender. Iporangella orchama sp. nov. http://zoobank.org/?lsid=urn:lsid:zoobank. org:act:F0AB5DDE-3IDD-4CC5-AB98-BB93ED21D327 Figs. 1-5 Material examined. — Holotype male. BRAZIL: Sdo Paulo: Iporanga, Vale do Ribeira, 24°33'34"S, 48°40'02"W, 19 March 2002, Winkler extraction, “raizes e folhigo” (roots and leaf fitter), R. Andrade (MZUSP 67821). Paratypes: BRAZIL: Sdo Paulo: 1 6 , same data as holotype except 8 March 2002 (MZUSP 67822); 1 ?, same data (MZUSP 67817); 1 tritonymph, same data (MZUSP 67818); 1 tritonymph, same data (MZUSP 67819); 1 protonymph, same data (MZUSP 67820). Diagnosis. — As for genus. Description (adults). — Color: all sclerotized portions deep red-brown (Figs. lA-E). All sclerotized portions coarsely tuberculate and reticulate. Setae: most setae short, inconspicuous, slightly curved and acuminate. Cerotegument: most surfaces covered with conspicuous cerotegument. Chelicera (Fig. 4D): hand with 5 large and several small setae; is and Is adjacent to each other; movable finger with 1 subdistal seta; galea very thick, without rami; hand coarsely tuberculate, except for finger and basal third; fingers without teeth; rallum with 1 long, thin blade (Fig. 4E); serrula exterior with ca. 18 blades; lamina exterior absent. Pedipalp (Figs. 2H, 4F): trochanter with long, curved prolateral conical protuberance, 1.78-2.06 (cj), 1.90 ($), femur very robust, without triangular process on prolateral corner, 2.02-2.05 (c3), 1.97 (2), patella conical 2.91 (d), 2.73 (2), chela tubular, chela (with pedicel) 3.88-4.00 (<5), 3.75 (2), HARVEY ET AL.— FIRST NEW WORLD FEAELLIDAE 229 Figure 1. — Iporangella orchama sp. nov., holotype male (MZUSP 67821): A, body, dorsal view; B, body, ventral view; C, cephalothorax, dorsal view; D, body, lateral view; E, cephalothorax, ventral view. chela (without pedicel) 3.58-3.73 ( 0.05). Ambush behavior was performed more frequently by females and juveniles than males. Juveniles were observed feeding more frequently than adults (males and females), and male adults did so less frequently than females. Females were observed more doorkeeping than males and juveniles. Most of the time, the females were found with the metasoma outside the burrow, as if entering the burrow (in 93% of observations). Courtship behavior was observed in six pairs of scorpions. Combination of microhabitat, behavior and sex-age class. — Significant differences were observed between proportions of microhabitats used and sex-age class (Chi-square test, = 777.38, P < 0.0001), and between behavior and sex-age class (Chi-square test, — 3188.31, P < 0.0001). The bi-plot obtained by multiple correspondence analyses, performed for the total sample using sex-age class, behavior and microhab¬ itat, reveals that juveniles were more likely to be feeding on vegetation (Fig. 6). While the majority of males were observed walking on the leaf litter, the females were related to ambush on soil (Fig. 6). Even when the four sites were analyzed separately, the pattern observed was very similar. Table 2. — Percentage of microhabitat available (mean ± SD) in three sampled sites of the Chancani reserve. Site Soil Leaf litter Vegetation Mature forest 50.4 ± 16.1 30.6 ± 14.4 18.7 ± 13.5 Secondary forest 53.9 ± 14.3 20.0 ± 12.9 26.0 ± 13.9 Forest with livestock 60.2 ± 14.3 20.6 ± 11.5 19.2 ± 8.6 DISCUSSION Temporal distribution of sex-age class. The surface activity of males, females and juveniles was higher in November, and declined over the months in all three classes. However, all sex- age classes remained active during all the months sampled. The decrease was more marked in females; they did not have the increase in February that was observed in the other classes (Fig. 3). This may be because, after getting pregnant, the Table 3. — Counts of Brachistosternus fernigineus occurrence in each microhabitat within each site in Chancani period of sampling. reserve, during the Site Sex-age class Soil ] Leaf litter Vegetation Total Mature forest Males 126 43 15 184 Females 108 41 47 196 Juveniles 104 43 83 230 Secondary forest Males 93 24 5 122 Females 125 38 19 182 Juveniles 118 12 54 184 Forest with Males 42 16 2 60 livestock Females 64 27 7 98 Juveniles 73 7 20 100 Jarillal Males 53 12 0 65 Females 30 9 3 42 Juveniles 56 5 7 68 Total 992 277 262 153! 240 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 4. — Generalized linear mixed models. Relationship between the surface activity of males, females and juveniles of Brachistosternus ferriigineiis and each microhabitat used in the Chancani reserve. Average monthly scorpions ± standard error of the mean. Means with a letter in common are not significantly different (Fisher’s LSD, P > 0.05). Microhabitat T P Males Females Juveniles Soil 2.12 0.3463 40.99 ± 6.83 A 42.68 ± 7.10 A 45.82 ± 7.59 A Leaf litter 12.93 0.0016 12.92 ± 2.08 A ]5.64± 2.42 A 9.11 ± 1.58 B Vegetation 124.89 <0.0001 2.93 ± 0.74 C 10.12 ± 1.82 B 21.83 ± 3.48 A females stay sheltered in their burrows (Mahsberg 2001; Kaltsas et al. 2008). The higher surface activity for the three classes in November could be because, in this region of the southern hemisphere, scorpions generally begin to leave their shelters or burrows and surface during spring when temperatures begin rising (Warburg & Polis 1990; Ojanguren-Affilastro 2005; Yamaguti & Pinto-da-Rocha 2006; Nime et al. 2013) to begin feeding after the winter and probably find a partner. We did not observe marked differences in temporal distribution between sex-age classes, as exists in many species of scorpions to avoid intra- and interspecific competition and predation (Polis 1980, 1984; Due & Polis 1985; Polis & McCormick 1987). Microhabitat preference and behaviors associated with each sex-age class. — The microhabitat most used in all classes of B. ferrugineus was soil, and ambush was the most common behavior. When we examined all sex-age classes of scorpions together, we found that microhabitats were used in proportion to their availability. On the another hand, the most common behavior expected was ambush, because active looking for prey is not common in scorpions (McCormick & Polis 1990) since it involves a significant expenditure of energy (Kaltsas et al. 2008). Kaltsas et al. (2008) found that the most common behavior (over 84%) in looking for food for all sex-age classes 360- Microhabitat Figure 4. — Surface activity of males (black bars), females (dark grey bars) and juveniles (light grey bars) of Brachistostenuis ferrugineus in different microhabitats in the Chancani Reserve. Bars represent total number of scorpions observed. of Mesobuthus gibbosiis (Brulli, 1832) species was “sit-and- wait” {ambush), coinciding with our observations. However, the correspondence analysis clearly demonstrated one combination of a behavior and microhabitat was associated with each sex-age class. Male scorpions were mostly seen walking on leaf litter, females were more likely to be seen engaging in ambush behavior on soil, and juveniles were associated with feeding in vegetation. That walking behavior is more associated with males was also observed in the species Centruroides vittatus (Say, 1821) (Polis 1980; Yamashita 2004). Males of this species are more active (54.4% walking on the soil surface) than females (34.9%). Also, males had a greater displacement, with marked individuals being found many meters away from the initial site, while females were found a few meters from the site, even after several weeks (Yamashita 2004). This increased move¬ ment of males is observed mainly in the breeding season as they actively search for females to mate (Polis & Farley 1979; Polis & Sissom 1990; Araujo et al. 2010). In the present study, doorkeeping behavior was performed more often by females than by males and juveniles. Similar results were observed in females of M. gibbosus; these fed and looked for prey at the entrance of their burrows {“door¬ keeping'' strategy) more than males and juveniles, who were preferably near or far from their burrows (Kaltsas et al. 2008). 420 Ambush Feeding Walking Doorkeeping Courting Behavior Figure 5. — Surface activity of males (black bars), females (dark grey bars) and juveniles (light grey bars) of Brachistosternus ferrugineus in the performing of different behaviors in the Chancani Reserve. Bars represent total number of scorpions observed. NIME ET AL.— MICROHABITAT USE AND BEHAVIOR OF A SCORPION SPECIES 24! Table 5. — Counts of Brachistosternus ferrugineus performing each behavior in each study site of the Chancani reserve. Site Sex-age class Ambush Feeding Walking Doorkeeping Courting Total Mature forest Males 114 9 57 1 3 184 Females 144 11 31 7 3 196 Juveniles 161 31 34 4 0 230 Secondary forest Males 81 1 36 3 1 122 Females 119 9 41 12 1 182 Juveniles 125 22 36 1 0 184 Forest with livestock Males 39 2 19 0 0 60 Females 59 10 22 7 0 98 Juveniles 65 15 17 3 0 100 Jarillal Males 55 0 7 1 2 65 Females 29 2 7 2 2 42 Juveniles 54 4 9 1 0 68 Total 1045 116 316 42 12 1531 In the “doorkeeping’' hunting strategy, the scorpion is located at the entrance to the burrow or refuge and waits for prey to approach (Benton 2001). Most females of M. gibbosus had recently mated. Therefore, staying close to their burrows is probably due to the maternal protective instinct (Mahsberg 2001; Kaltsas et al. 2008). Furthermore, foraging far from the burrow requires tolerance to adverse environmental condi¬ tions and inter- and intraspecific competition. In the open area, where males and juveniles of M. gibbosus feed mainly using the “sii and wait" strategy, temperature and relative humidity are comparatively lower, wind speed is higher and the moon is an important factor, while in the burrows of females, generally under the vegetation, environmental condi¬ tions are better (Kaltsas et al. 2008). Probably staying at the entrance is advantageous as there is a microclimate inside and environmental conditions are more favorable, and they have a shelter near to hide from predators. The females of M. gibbosus observed at the entrance of their burrows had only their pedipalps and sometimes their prosoma visible. In our study, the most common behavior of females of B. ferrugineus when doing doorkeeping, was at the entrance of their burrows with their metasoma outside, as if entering the burrow (in 93% of observations). The reasons why scorpions prefer a backwards position at the burrow entrance are unknown; they may have been entering in their burrows in flight after sensing the approach of collectors. Burrowing scorpions are very sensitive to vibrations in the ground (Warburg & Polis 1990). We found the juveniles associated with feeding in vegetation. The behavior of climbing the vegetation has been previously observed in other species of scorpions (Williams 1970; Polis 1979; Bradley 1988; Cao 1993; Skutelsky 1996; Brown & O’Connell 2000; McReynolds 2004, 2008). In Paruroclonus utahensis (Williams, 1968), more juveniles than adults were observed in the vegetation (Bradley 1988). Juveniles of Buthus occitanus (Amoreux, 1789) were found in the bushes at a rate ten times higher than that of adults (Skutelsky 1996). Although the reason for climbing behavior in the vegetation is unclear, there are some hypotheses such as decreasing the risk of predation, or increasing feeding success by foraging in an area with higher prey availability (Bradley 1988; Polis 1990; Brown & O'Connell 2000). The first hypothesis suggests that climbing is a behavior to avoid predation and assumes that the risk of predation is lower in vegetation than on the soil. Two observations are consistent with this hypothesis (Brown & O’Connell 2000). First, climbing has been seen generally in small species and juveniles of larger species (Polis 1979; Bradley 1988; Skutelsky 1996). In this study, B. ferrugineus is one of the smallest species in the area and the only one that we observed to climb vegetation. As these species or individuals probably have a wide range of predators that live on the soil (including larger intra- and interspecific scorpions; Polis & McCormick 1987), climbing could reduce meeting potential predators. Also, it was noted that C. vittalus moves on to vegetation during the phase of the moon with greater light intensity (50-100%) (McReynolds 2004). In open areas, scorpions are more visible to predators at night and so such a change in microhabitat use during the lunar cycle behavior may reduce the risk of predation when the illumination of the moon is high (McReynolds 2004). The present study could not test this, because sampling was always performed on moonless nights. Second, some species have been seen to take prey Table 6. — Generalized linear mixed models. Relationship between the surface activity of males, females and juveniles of Brachistosternus ferrugineus in each behavior observed in the Chancani reserve. Average monthly scorpions ± standard error. Means with a letter in common are not significantly different (Fisher’s LSD, P > 0.05). Behavior P Males Females Juveniles Ambush 19.51 0.0001 38.48 ± 5.94 B 46.74 ± 7.12 A 53.93 ± 8.15 A Feeding 49.33 <0.0001 1.53 ± 0.53 C 4.09 ± 1.08 B 9.19 ± 2.11 A Walking 2.73 0.2548 11.67 ± 5.19 A 9.90 ± 4.42 A 9.41 ± 4.21 A Doorkeeping 19.19 <0.0001 0.60 ± 0.30 B 3.24 ± 1.00 A 1.08 ± 0.44 B Courting 9.73 0.0077 0.32 ± 0.26 A 0.32 ± 0.26 A 0 ± 0 B 242 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 6. — Bi-plot obtained by multiple correspondence analysis. The principal axes represents the gradient in the relationship among the categorical variables sex-age class, behavior and microhabitat of Brachistostemus ferrugineiis., categories close in the graph are more related. captured on soil to vegetation before consumption, perhaps in order to reduce the chance of encountering a predator that might cause death or the loss of the prey while trying to escape (Poiis 1979; Cao 1993; Brown & O’Connell 2000). In Smeringiirus mesaensis this was age-specific behavior, with a significantly higher proportion of juveniles than of adults consuming prey in the vegetation (Poiis 1979). In the present study, after the juveniles, females of B. ferrugineiis were more frequently observed in the vegetation. The same occurs in C. viltatiis, with females climbing more than males (Brown & O’Connell 2000; Yamashita 2004). The second hypothesis suggests that prey abundance is higher in the vegetation, so feeding there would be more energy efficient (Bradley 1988; Poiis 1990). However, although scorpions have been observed feeding while on vegetation, evidence of active foraging there is scarce (Poiis 1990; Skutelsky 1996). Possibly the vegetation, which creates a more complex environment than environmental deserts, offers juveniles more opportunities for hiding and reducing overlap with adults (Hofer et al. 1996). Habitat complexities reduce niche overlaps and may reduce the need of temporary displacement (Yamashita 2004). Based on our results, we hypothesize that the behavior of climbing into vegetation is performed by juveniles for the purpose of feeding without risk of losing the prey and avoiding being preyed on in turn. However, this hypothesis requires testing. Our hypothesis that sex-age classes of B. ferrugineiis use different microhabitats while showing temporal displacement is rejected; sex-age classes did use different microhabitats, but without temporal displacement. We conclude that the microhabitat use and behavior frequencies were highly dependent on developmental stage and sex. The differences observed may facilitate the age-sex class coexistence of B. ferrugineiis and may reduce the need of temporary displace¬ ment due to the risk of predation and competition for feeding. Also, this species is the only one that uses vegetation in the study area, and this possibility of using different niches could be one reason why B. fernigineus is the most abundant and conspicuous species in the area, despite being physically one of the smallest (Nime et al. 2013). The findings of this study on the ecology and behavior of this widespread species are therefore important for understanding the processes of intra¬ specific coexistence and can contribute to a greater under¬ standing of the structure of arthropod communities in the Argentine Arid Chaco, and to general knowledge of scorpion ecology. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to the Secretaria de Ambiente (Gobierno de la Provincia de Cordoba), for allowing access to work in the Chancam' Reserve. We thank Jose Gonzalez for assisting us in the field and Joss Heywood for help with the English language. We thank Eugenia Romero for the picture of a B . ferrugineus couple. We thank two anonymous reviewers for comments that improved the manuscript. This research was supported by a doctoral grant from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas, Argentina (CONICET) to MN. Fieldwork was supported by a Rufford Small Grants Foundation award to MN, and by SECYT (UNC) grant 214/10 to CIM. CIM is a CONICET researcher. LITERATURE CITED Abdi, H. & D. Valentin. 2007. Multiple correspondence analysis. Pp. 651-657. In Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. (N.J. Salkind, ed.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California. Acosta, L.E. 1995. The scorpions of the Argentinian Western Chaco 11. Community survey in the Llanos District. Biogeographica 7:187-196. Araujo, C.S., D.M. Candido, H.F.P. Araujo, S.C. de Dias & A. Vasconcellos. 2010. Seasonal variations in scorpion activities (Arachnida: Scorpiones) in an area of Caatinga vegetation in northeastern Brazil. Zoologia (Curitiba) 27:372-376. Benton, T.G. 2001. Reproductive ecology. Pp. 278-301. In Scorpion NIME ET AL.— MICROHABITAT USE AND BEHAVIOR OF A SCORPION SPECIES 243 Biology and Research. (P. Brownell & G.A. Polls, eds.). Oxford University Press, New York. Bradley, R.A. 1988. The influence of weather and biotic factors on the behavior of the scorpion {Pamroctoims utahensis). Journal of Animal Ecology 57:533-551. Brown, C.A. & D.J. O’Connell. 2000. Plant climbing behavior in the scorpion Centrwoides vittatus. American Midland Naturalist 144:406-418. Brownell, P. & G.A. Polls. 2001. Scorpion Biology and Research. Oxford University Press, New York. Cabido, M. & M.J. Pacha. 2002. Vegetacidn y Flora de la Reserva Natural Chancani. Agenda Cordoba Ambiente, Cordoba, Argen¬ tina. Cao, W. 1993. Coexistence of three species of desert scorpions by habitat selection. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona. Carranza, M.L., M.R. Cabido, A. Acosta & S.A. Paez. 1992. Las comunidades vegetales del parque Natural Provincial y Reserva Forestal Natural Chancani, provincia de Cordoba. Lilloana 38:75- 92. Di Rienzo, J.A., F. Casanoves, M.G. Balzarini, L. Gonzalez, M. Tablada & C.W. Robledo. 2013. InfoStat. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Cdrdoba, Argentina. Online at http:// www.infostat.com.ar Due, D. & G.A. Polls. 1985. The biology of Vaejovis littoralis Williams, an intertidal scorpion from Baja California, Mexico. Journal of Zoology, London 207:563-580. Hadley, N.F. & S.C. Williams. 1968. Surface activities of some North American scorpions in relation to feeding. Ecology 49:726-734. Hamerlynck, E.P., T.E. Huxman, R.S. Nowak, S. Redar, M.E. Loik, D.N. Jordan et al. 2000. Photosynthetic responses of Larrea tridentata to a step-increase in atmospheric CO2 at the Nevada Desert FACE Facility. Journal of Arid Environments 44:425-436. Hbfer, H., E. Wollscheid & T. Gasnier. 1996. The relative abundance of Brotlieas amazonicus (Chactidae, Scorpiones) in different habitat types of a central Amazon rainforest. Journal of Arachnology 24:34-38. Honetschlager, L.D. 1965. A new method for hunting scorpions. Turtox News 43:69-70. Kaltsas, D., 1. Stathi & M. Mylonas. 2008. The foraging activity of Mesohullnis gibbosus (Scorpiones: Buthidae) in central and south Aegean archipelago. Journal of Natural History 42:513-527. Kaltsas, D., 1. Stathi & M. Mylonas. 2009. Intraspecific differenti¬ ation of social behavior and selection in Mesobuthiis gibbosus (Brule, 1832) (Scorpiones: Buthidae). Journal of Ethology ll'Abl- 473. Lira, A.F.A. & A.M. De Souza. 2014. Microhabitat use by scorpion species (Arachnida: Scorpiones) in the montane Atlantic Rain Forest, Brazil. Revista Iberica de Aracnologi'a 24:107-108. Lira, A.F.A., A.M. De Souza, A.A.C. Silva Filho & C.M.R. Albuquerque. 2013. Spatio-temporal microhabitat use by two cooccurring species of scorpions in Atlantic rainforest in Brazil. Zoology 116:182-185. Luttbeg, B. & O.J. Schmitz. 2000. Predator and prey models with flexible individual behavior and imperfect information. American Naturalist 155:669-683. Mahsberg, D. 2001. Brood care and social behavior. Pp. 257-277. In Scorpion Biology and Research. (P. Brownell & G.A. Polls, eds.). Oxford University Press, New York. McCormick, S.J. & G.A. Polls. 1990. Prey, predators and parasites. Pp. 294-320. In The Biology of Scorpions. (G.A. Polls, ed.). University Press, Stanford, California. McReynolds, C.N. 2004. Temporal patterns in microhabitat use for the scorpion Centrwoides vittatus (Scorpiones: Buthidae). Euscor- pius 17:35^5. McReynolds, C.N. 2008. Microhabitat preferences for the errant scorpion, Centruroides vittatus (Scorpiones, Buthidae). Journal of Arachnology 36:557-564. Murdoch, W.W. & A. Sih. 1978. Age dependent interference in a predatory insect. Journal of Animal Ecology 47:581-592. Nime, M.F., F. Casanoves & C.I. Mattoni. 2014. Scorpion diversity in two different habitats in the Arid Chaco, Argentina. Journal of Insect Conservation 18:373-384. Nime, M.F., F. Casanoves, D.E. Vrech & C.I. Mattoni. 2013. Relationship between environmental variables and surface activity of scorpions in the Arid Chaco ecoregion of Argentina. Inverte¬ brate Biology 132:145-155. Ojanguren-Affilastro, A. A. 2005. Estudio monografico de los escorpiones de la Republica Argentina. Revista Iberica de Aracnologi'a 11:75-241. Ojanguren-Affilastro, A. A., C. 1. Mattoni, J.A. Ochoa, M.J. Ramirez, F. S. Ceccarelli «& L. Prendini. 2016. Phylogeny, species delimita¬ tion and convergence in the South American bothriurid scorpion genus Brachistostenius Pocock 1893: Integrating morphology, nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 94:159-170. Olson, D.M., E. Dinerstein, E.D. Wikramanayake, N.D. Burgess, G. V.N. Powell, E.C. Underwood et al. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51:933-938. Pelegrin, N. & E.H. Bucher. 2010. Long-term effects of a wildfire on a lizard assemblage in the Arid Chaco forest. Journal of Arid Environments 74:368-372. Polis, G.A. 1979. Prey and feeding phenology of the desert sand scorpion Paruroctonus ntesaensis (Scorpionida: Vaejovidae). Jour¬ nal of Zoology, London 188:333-346. Polis, G.A. 1980. Seasonal patterns and age-specific variation in the surface activity of a population of desert scorpions in relation to environmental factors. Journal of Animal Ecology 49:1-18. Polis, G.A. 1984. Age structure component of niche width and intraspecific resource partitioning: Can age groups function as ecological species? American Naturalist 123:541-564. Polis, G.A. 1990. The Biology of Scorpions. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. Polis, G.A. & R.D. Farley. 1979. Behavior and ecology of mating in the cannibalistic scorpion, Paruroctonus niesaensis Stahnke (Scor¬ pionida: Vaejovidae). Journal of Arachnology 7:33-46. Polis, G.A. & W.R. Lourenfo. 1986. Sociality among scorpions. Pp. 111-115. In Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Arachnology. International Society of Arachnology, Barcelona, Spain. Polis, G.A. & S.J. McCormick. 1986. Patterns of resource use and age structure among species of desert scorpion. Journal of Animal Ecology 55:59-74. Polis, G.A. & S.J. McCormick. 1987. Intraguild predation and competition among desert scorpions. Ecology 68:332-343. Polis, G.A. & W.D. Sissom. 1990. Life History. Pp. 161-223. In The Biology of Scorpions. (G.A. Polis, ed.). Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. Polis, G.A. & T. Yamashita. 1991. The ecology and importance of predaceous arthropods in desert communities. Pp. 180-222. In The Ecology of Desert Communities. (G.A. Polis, ed.). University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona. Polis, G.A., C.N. McReynolds & G.R. Ford. 1985. Home range geometry of the desert scorpion Paruroctonus niesaensis. Oecologia 67:273-277. Polis, G.A., W.D. Sissom & S.J. McCormick. 1981. Predators of scorpions: field data and a review. Journal of Arid Environments 4:309-326. R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Online at http://www.R-project.org/ 244 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Rein, J.O. 2015. The Scorpion Files. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Online at http.7/www. ub.ntnu.no/scorpion-files/ Shehab, A.H., Z.S. Amr & J.A. Lindsell. 2011. Ecology and biology of scorpions in Palmyra, Syria. Turkish Journal of Zoology 35:333-341. Skutelsky, O. 1996. Predation risk and state-dependent foraging in scorpions: effects of moonlight on foraging in the scorpion Butinis occitcmus. Animal Behavior 52:49-57. Warburg, M.R. & G.A. Polis. 1990. Behavioral responses, rhythms and activity patterns. Pp. 224-246. In The Biology of Scorpions. (G.A. Polis, ed.). University Press, Stanford, California. Whitford, W. 2002. Ecology of Desert Systems. Academic Press, London. Williams, S.C. 1970. Coexistence of desert scorpions by differential habitat preference. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 46:254-267. Williams, S.C. 1987. Scorpion bionomics. Annual Review of Entomology 32:275-295. Yamaguti, H.Y. & R. Pinto-da-Rocha. 2006. Ecology of Thestylus aurcintiwus of the Parque Estadual da Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae). Journal of Arachnology 34:214-220. Yamashita, T. 2004. Surface activity, biomass, and phenology of the striped scorpion, Centruroides vittatus (Buthidae) in Arkansas, USA. Euscorpius 17:25-33. Manuscript received 29 August 2015, revised 17 March 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:245-246 SHORT COMMUNICATION Leucism in Titym pmillus (Scorpiones: Buthidae): Report of a rare event in scorpions A.F.A. Lira', L.M. Pordeus' and C.M.R. Albuquerque^: 'Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciencias Biologicas, Departamento de Zoologia, Programa de Pos-Graduagao em Biologia Animal. Rua Prof. Moraes Rego S/N, Cidade Universitaria, 50570-420, Recife, PE, Brazil. E-mail: andref.lira@gmail.com; “Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciencias Biologicas, Departamento de Zoologia. Rua Prof. Moraes Rego S/N, Cidade Universitaria, 50570-420. Recife, PE, Brazil Abstract. Leucism is a congenital disorder in which the individual is born with partial hypopigmentation. It is quite common in vertebrates, but rare in invertebrates, especially in arachnids like scorpions. This paper presents the first record of this congenital disorder to be observed in the order Scorpiones. During field studies in the Area de Conservafdo Aldeia- Beberibe, a set of Atlantic forest fragments of 31,634 hectares, we collected a pregnant leucistic female Tityus pmillus Pocock, 1 893. In this female, the variegated pattern described for the species was a lighter color than normal. The animal produced 10 normal juveniles (not leucistics). In addition, we analyzed 1,164 specimens from 17 populations deposited in the CA-UFPE to verify the frequency of leucism; there were no scorpions with leucism within the analyzed populations. Thus, a break in variegated pattern, as with the leucism described in this study, may increase the mortality rate due to predation. Key words: Brazilian Atlantic Forest, color pattern, depigmentation degree Color patterns in scorpions have often attracted the attention of researchers, principally for ecological and taxonomical studies (Harington 1984; Lourenfo & Cloudsley-Thompson 1996; Lourenfo 2002; Vignoli et al. 2005; Olivero et al. 2012). Coloration patterns in these arachnids can vary from pale yellow to black, and the presence of sub-cuticular pigments form different configurations such as longitudinal or confluent bands (Louren^o 2002). Variations from these patterns are well documented for these arachnids, producing different morphology types (‘morphs’) for the same species (Lamoral 1979; Williams 1980; Flarington 1984; Vignoli et al. 2005). Environmental factors seem to play a role in many scorpions’ color variations (Louren^o & Cloudsley-Thompson 1996; Lourengo 2002). For example, with the buthid scorpions Tityus costatus (Karsch, 1879) found in the southern portion of the Brazilian Atlantic forest, those that live at sea level (dry environment) are ‘light morph,’ whereas individuals that occur at 1000 m above sea level (wet environment) are ‘darker morph’ (Lourengo 2002). Olivero et al. (2012) also found color variation within six Argentinean populations of the bothriurid scorpion Bothriwus honarieusis (C.L. Koch, 1842); these authors also reported that scorpions from wet sites are darker than specimens found in drier sites. Another form of variation in scorpion coloration is a complete absence of pigmentation, commonly found in animals that inhabit caves (Mitchell 1968, 1972; Francke 1977, 1978). In some cases, however, atypical coloration can occur without environmental influences, due to an excess (melanism) or an absence (albinism) of color pigment in part or all of the body (Sanchez- Hernandez et al. 2012). Albinism is a very rare event in scorpions, being reported in the literature only for the Australian scorpion Urodacus yascbenkoi (Birula, 1903) (Locket 1986). This author reported the presence of two albino specimens from the south of Australia, and also compared the eye structure between normal and albino animals, finding abnormalities in the eyes of albino scorpions. Albinism is an extreme form of an absence of color pigmentation in the body, but some animals show a partial hypopigmentary congenital disorder called ‘leucism’ (Herreid & Davies 1960), which is very common in vertebrates (Sanchez-Hernandez et al. 2012) but not in invertebrates. Here, a case of leucism in the scorpion Tityus pusillus Pocock, 1893 is described, together with data on its offspring and the frequency of occurrence in the population. This is a small ambush predator and the most common scorpion species in the northeast Brazilian Atlantic forest (Louren90 2002; Lira et al. 2013; Lira & Albuquerque 2014). Tityus pusillus is typically found inhabiting the forest floor, with its abundance correlated with climatic conditions and microhabitat structure (Lira et al. 2013, 2015). The species possesses a yellow basal color and brownish variegated coloration (Louren^o & Cloudsley-Thompson 1996; Louren90 2002). Leucism in T. pusillus was recorded in a pregnant female collected during a nocturnal field study conducted in the Area de Preserva9ao Ambiental Aldeia-Beberibe, a set of Atlantic forest fragments of 31,634 hectares (7° 54' 48"S 35° 2' 36' W) (CPRH 2015). The leucistic individual was maintained in laboratory conditions and gave birth to 10 normal (non-leucistic) young. Confirmation of female gender was carried out according to Louren90 (2002), following death after the young dispersed from her dorsum. The specimen was then deposited in the Arachnolog- ical Collection of Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil. Leucism (Fig. lA) was characterized by a lighter scale of pigmentation of the variegated pattern of coloration common for the species in relation to the normal color range of individuals (Fig. IB & C). To verify the frequency of leucism in this species, we examined 1,164 individuals from 17 different populations deposited in the Arachnological Collection (Table 1). Except for the leucistic female, no other record of leucism among individuals from the different populations analyzed was registered. Scorpions’ coloration constitutes the first line of defense of these animals, whose color patterns primarily have cryptic significance (Polis 1990; Louren90 & Cloudsley-Thompson 1996). These authors also suggest that most scorpion species that inhabit forests present two patterns of coloration, darker (darker brownish or black) and variegated (mottled). These colorations are camouflage within the darker environment found in forest interiors (Cloudsley-Thompson 1993a, b). Thus, the sedentary behavior shown by T. pusillus specimens (Lira et al. 2013) associated with variegated coloration may work as an effective defense against potential predators. Consequently, lighter morph types, such as the leucistic coloring described in the present study, would be more exposed to predation due to the lack of cryptic protection. In conclusion, our study describes for the first time the occurrence of leucism in scorpions; this event is rare, corresponding to a rate of just 0.06% in the population examined. 245 246 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 1. — Variation of color pattern of the scorpion, Tityus pusillus Pocock, 1893. A) Leucistic individual. B) Lighter individual. C) Normal individual. Table 1. — Number of populations. scorpions examined in the seventeen Location Coordinates Scorpions examined Paudalho 7°54'48"S, 35°02'36"W 60 Agua Preta 8°41'31.4'’S, 35°29'49"W 2 Jaqueira 8°43'03.9"S, 35°50'2i.6"W 104 Ipojuca 8°31'48"S, 35°01'05"W 24 A,breu e Lima 7N6'55"S, 35°09'02"W 101 Recife 8°00'00"S, 34°56'0'0"W 50 Tamandare 8°43'43"S, 35°10'39.8"W 60 Moreno 8°06'38.1"S, 35°06'56.4"W 165 Timbauba 7°36'36.6"S, 35°22'46.6"W 80 Igarassu 8°00'05.8"S, 34°52'23.1"W 85 Bui'que 8°35'08.2"S, 37'I4'29.3"W 48 Gravata 8°11TI.8"S, 35°33'51.9"W 37 Sao Bento do Una 8°31'45.7"S, 36°27'23.8"W 6 Sirinhaem 8°38'59.0"S, 35°I0'26.6"W 96 Jaboatao dos Guararapes 8°02'34"S, 35°02'22"W 86 Rio Formoso 8°32'07.6"S, 35°05'53"W 150 Caruaru 8°22'09"S, 36°05'00"W 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are very grateful to Coordenagao de Aperfei^oamento de Pessoal de Mvel Superior (CAPES) for a doctoral scholarship to AFAL and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) for a masteral scholarship to LMP. We are also very grateful to Juarez Pordeus for permission to use the area to collect samples. LITERATURE CITED Cloudsley-Thompson, J.L. 1993a. The adaptational diversity of desert biota. Environmental Conservation 20:227-231. Cloudsley-Thompson, J.L. 1993b. Successful desert animals - scorpions, beetles and lizards. Libyan Studies 24:143-156. CPRH. 2015. Agencia Estadual do Meio Ambiente. Online at http:// www.cprh.pe.gov.br/unidades_cooservacao/Apa/APA_Aldeia_ Beberibe/41704%3B41427%3B224202%3B0%3B0.asp Francke, O.F. 1977. The genus Diplocentnis in the Yucatan peninsula, with description of two new troglobites (Scorpionida, Diplocentridae). Association of Mexican Cave Studies Bulletin 6:49-61. Francke, O.F. 1978. New troglobite scorpion of genus Diplocentrus. Scorpionida, Diplocentridae. Entomological News 89:39-45. Harington, A. 1984. Character variation in the scorpion Parabuthus villosus (Peters) (Scorpiones, Buthidae): A case of intermediate zones. Journal of Arachnology 11:393-406. Herreid, C.F. II & R.B. Davies. 1960. Frequency and placement of white fur on free-tailed bats. Journal of Mammalogy 41:117-119. Lamoral, B.H. 1979. The scorpions of Namibia (Arachnida: Scorpionida). Annals of Natal Museum 23:497-784. Lira, A.F.A & C.M.R. Albuquerque. 2014. Diversity of scorpions (Chelicerata: Arachnida) in the Atlantic Forest in Pernambuco, northeastern Brazil. Check List 10:1331-1335. Lira, A.F.A, F.N.A.A Rego & C.M.R. Albuquerque. 2015. How important are environmental factors for the population structure of co-occurring scorpion species in a tropical forest? Canadian Journal of Zoology 93:15-19. Lira, A.F.A, A.M. Souza, A.A.C. Silva Filho & C.M.R. Albuquer¬ que. 2013. Spatio-temporal microhabitat use by two co-occurring species of scorpions in Atlantic rainforest in Brazil. Zoology 116:182-185. Locket, N.A. 1986. Albinism and eye structure in an Australian scorpion, Urodacus yaschenkoi (Scorpiones, Scorpionidae). Journal of Arachnology 14:101-115. Louren^o, W.R. 2002. Scorpions of Brazil. Les Editions de I’lf, Paris. Lourengo, W.R. & J.L. Cloudsley-Thompson. 1996. The evolutionary significance of colour, colour patterns and fluorescence in scorpions. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 2:449-458. Mitchell, R.V7. 1968. Typhlochactas, a new genus of eyeless cave scorpion from Mexico (Scorpionida, Chactidae). Annals of Speleology 23:753-777. Mitchell, R.W. 1972. Typhlochactas elliotti, a new eyeless cave scorpion from Mexico (Scorpionida, Chactidae). Annals of Speleology 26:135-148. Olivero, P.A., C.I. Mattoni & A.V. Peretti. 2012. Morphometry and geographical variation of Bothriurus bonariensis (Scorpiones: Bothriuridae). Journal of Arachnology 40:113-122. Polis, G.A. 1990. The Biology of Scorpions. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Califronia. Sanchez-Hernandez, C., A. Rojas-Martmez, J.C. Lopez-Vidal, C. Elizalde-Arellano, M.D.L. Romero-Almaraz, M. Aguillar-Lopez et al. 2012. Leucism in five species of bats from Mexico. Chiroptera Neotropical 18:1123-1127. Vignoli V., N. Salomone, T. Caruso & F. Bernini. 2005. The Eiiscorpius tergestinus (C.L. Koch, 1837) complex in Italy: Biometrics of sympatric hidden species (Scorpiones: Euscorpiidae). Zoologischer Anzeiger 244:97-113. Williams, S.C. 1980. Scorpions of Baja California, Mexico, and adjacent islands. Occasional papers of the California Academy of Sciences 135:1-127. Manuscript received 13 January 2016, revised 14 April 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:247-250 SHORT COMMUNICATION Egg sac parasitism: how important are parasitoids in the range expansion of the wasp spider Argiope bmennichP. Wioletta Wawer* and Agata Kostro-Ambroziak^; ’Museum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences, Wiicza 64, 00-679 Warszawa, Poland. E-mail; wawer@miiz.waw.pl; "Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Institute of Biology, University of Bialystok, Ciolkowskiego IJ, 15-245 Biaiystok, Poland Abstract. During recent decades, the wasp spider, Argiope hruennichi (Scopoli, 1772), has expanded relatively quickly towards north Europe. As a consequence of its spreading, it is newly exposed to various factors of selection. We studied the impact of egg sac parasitoids on the mortality of A. bruennichi in three regions differing in climate conditions and time of settling by this spider. Parasitism of wasp spider egg sacs was relatively low (0-3.9%) and no significant differences between studied regions were found. One primary parasitoid, Tromatobia onuita, was reared; in approximately 60% of these ! parasitized cocoons, the entire content of the egg sac was destroyed. • Keywords: Pseudohyperparasitoid, host, Tromatobia onuita, Pediobius brachycerus ‘ The wasp spider, Argiope bruennichi (Scopoli, 1772) is a Palaearctic species that has been expanding northward from the Mediterranean (Kumschick et al. 2011); its European range currently also includes Scandinavia (Jonsson & Wilander 1999; Bratli & Hansen 2004; Koponen et al. 2007). In Poland, the wasp spider was first recorded in 1935 (Urbanski 1935), and, for several decades, its area was restricted only to the west and south-eastern parts of the country. Since the 1990s, A. bruennichi has rapidly spread towards the north. Now, the wasp spider occurs throughout Poland and is numerous everywhere, i except for the higher elevation of the mountains (Wawer 2012). The expansion of some European species to the north may be connected with global warming (e.g., Hughes 2000; Walther et al. 2002; Hickling et al. 2006). In the case of the thermophilous wasp spider, this may be . one of the most important factors (Ivinskis et al. 2009), but other factors may also favor its spreading, e.g., prolongation of the growing : season, increasing the area of fallow lands or transport intensification ; causing passive dispersion (Guttmann 1979). As a consequence of expansion, A. hruennichi is exposed to new factors of selection (Leborgne & Pasquet 2005). Natural enemies have a significant mortality impact on local spider populations (Polis et al. 1998), and parasitoids might be the most important of these (Foelix 2011). Among parasitoids, there are some that develop individually within eggs (e.g., Scelonidae), or feed on spider egg masses (e.g., Mantispidae, Ichneumonidae, Phoridae), as well as ectoparasitoids (e.g., Ichneumonidae) and endoparasitoids (e.g., Acroceridae) of post-embryonic spiders — both spiderlings and mature spiders (Austin 1985; Fitton et al. 1987; Schlinger 1993; Allard & Robertson 2003; Finch 2005). The mortality of eggs and spiderlings is considered to be the most significant factor regarding the spider life cycle (Topping 1997). Parasitoids that are associated with the wasp spider are species of the Ichneumonidae and Eulophidae (Hymenoptera). Among the ichneumonid wasps, Tromatobia ornata (Gravenhorst, 1829) from the Pimplinae (Rollard 1985, 1990) and Buathra tarsoleucos (Schrank, 1781) and Thaumatogelis gallicus (Seyrig, 1928) from the Cryptinae have been recorded as parasitizing A. bruennichi (Fahringer 1922; Schwarz 2001). These species develop by feeding on cocooned spider eggs, but none of them are specific to A. bruennichi (Fitton et al. 1987; Yu et al. 2012). The parasitic wasp from the Eulophidae, Pediobius brachycerus (Thomson, 1878) is an obligatory hyperparasitoid (secondary parasitoid) of spider egg sacs, which necessarily parasitizes a spider’s primary parasitoids, including some species of ichneumonid parasitoid wasps (Fitton et al. 1987; Kostro-Ambroziak & Wawer 2015). Here we studied the influence of egg sac parasitoids on the mortality of A. bruennichi in regions differing by time of settling of this spider and climatic conditions, based on populations from Poland. Investigations were carried out from 201 1 to 2013. Egg sacs of A. hruennichi were collected from nine localities in three regions of Poland: the Suwalki Lake District (SLDi: 54°8'14.88"N, 22°55'58.94"E; SLD2: 54°8'32.29"N, 22°50'55.37"E; SLD3: 54°5'25.23"N, 22°59'12.55"E), the Mazovian Lowland (MLl: 52°19'5.39"N, 20°52'32.29"E; ML2: 52°22'46.67"N, 20°47'47.04"E; ML3: 52°0'29.66''N, 21°22T2.58"E), and the Sandomierz Valley (SVl: 50°10'38.01"N, 21°43'12.09"E; SV2: 50°1 0'48.08 "N, 21°42'31.02"E; SV3: 50°8'57.20"N, 2r40'36.67"E) (Fig. 1). In south-east Poland, the first individuals of A. bruennichi were discovered in the 1960s (the Low Beskids) (Bednarz 1966). In the Mazovian Lowland, A. bruennichi was observed for the first time in 1998 (Kajak & Luczak 2003). At that time, this species was considered to be rare and endangered in Poland, which led to its protection by law. In northern Poland (the Suwalki Lake District), the wasp spider was observed for the first time in 2005 (W. Wawer, unpubl.). Meanwhile, recent years have brought a wave of expansion of unusual intensity, causing species dispersal and establishment across virtually the entire country. The number of known locations doubled from 1990 to 2007 (Wawer 2014). The three regions mentioned above (SLD, ML, SV) differ in climatic conditions — the region furthest to the north is the coldest and probably due to this factor, it is characterized by fewer A. bruennichi. Egg sacs overwintered in natural conditions on plant leaves, ca. 20 cm above the ground, in open areas, mainly in meadows and on agricultural wastelands. In April, they were collected and transported in a plastic jar and kept at a constant temperature of 8 °C until the dissection began. The egg sacs were opened at the end of April. Each egg sac was examined under a microscope and cut by medical scissors. Parasitized egg sacs were stored at room temperature on a piece of cotton wool in a plastic jar (50 ml), and every day, a few drops of water were added to preserve humidity. The adult parasitic wasps emerged after about 10 days (April/May). Adult wasps were identified by morphological characteristics with reference to the taxonomic literature (Boucek 1965; Fitton et al. 1988). Additionally, pupal cases of parasitoids were confirmed by DNA barcode sequences. Reference Sequences (RefSeq) were obtained in this study. Genomic DNA was extracted using a Genomic 247 248 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Figure 1 . — Distribution of localities in Poland where the egg sacs of Argiope bruennkhi were collected: the Suwalki Lake District (SLD), the Mazovian Lowland (ML) and the Sandomierz Valley (SV). Mini Kit (A&A Biotechnology). The primers LepFl (5'-A.TTCAAC- CAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3') and LepRl (5-TAAACTTCTG- GATGTCCAAAAAATCA-3') were used for COI mtDNA fragment amplification (650 pz) (Smith et al. 2009). PCR consisted of an initial activation step at 95 °C for 1 5 min; 45 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 52 °C for 90 sec and extension at 72 °C for 60 sec and a final extension at 60 °C for 30 min. The sequence data for the COI gene sequences were submitted to GenBank with the accession number KU870312. All voucher specimens are deposited in the collection of Museum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences. In total, 560 egg sacs of A. bruennkhi were examined. The degree of parasitism of wasp spider egg sacs was 3.9% (Table 1). In the central region ML, we noticed no infested egg sacs. No significant differences between the other two regions (SLD and SV) were found (Fisher’s Exact test, P = 0.21). One primary parasitoid, Tromatobia ornata, was reared from 22 egg sacs and the secondary parasitoid Pediobius brachycerus from 11 egg sacs (Table 1). The former parasitoids were noticed as pupae (1-3 per sac) and the latter as larvae inside pupal casings (1-8 per sac). Only two egg sacs produced two or three individuals of T. ornata. The reproductive fitness of the A. bruennkhi female was greater than zero in all cases of parasitization. In 41% of parasitized cocoons, an average of 148 living nymphs of spiders per egg sac were detected (SD =100.1; range = 1-220). The unparasitized egg sacs either contained up to 642 living nymphs of the wasp spider, or were damaged, empty or with undeveloped embryos. Both in parasitized and unparasitized egg sacs, a portion of the spider eggs failed to develop (59% and 35.3%, respectively), a statistically significant difference (Chi-square test, X^i = 475.5, P < O.OOi). The egg-sac of A. bruennkhi is under maternal care for a few days (Leborgne & Pasquet 2005). The layer structure of the wasp spider cocoon protects eggs and spiderlings from fluctuating temperatures and desiccation, as well as acting as a mechanical barrier against parasitoids and parasites (Hieber 1985, 1992; Bergthaler 1995). Tromatobia ornata lays eggs into spider cocoons in reddish threads close to the outer layer (Rollard 1990). Parasitism of the egg sac of A. bruennkhi by T. ornata in Poland is distinctly lower (0-3.9%) than in Germany (0-50%) (Sacher 2001) or France (8^4%) (Leborgne & Pasquet 2005), where T. ornata is also a main parasitoid in egg sacs of this spider species. The low degree of parasitism in Poland may be the effect of a shift in the time of oviposition of host and parasitoid caused by the recent spread of A. bruennkhi. Rollard (1987) revealed that egg sacs were parasitized by T. ornata only by the time juveniles emerged. The spider embryos develop in approximately 2 to 3 weeks and nymphs hibernate during winter in the egg sac (Von Becker 1983; Rollard 1987). Because of this, females of A. bruennkhi that lay their eggs early avoid parasitoids and have higher reproductive success (Leborgne & Pasquet 2005). Because T. ornata is relatively widespread in Poland, it is probable that here it parasitizes other hosts, both other spiders and moths (Yu et al. 2012), and the wasp spider is not a limiting factor for this parasitoid. Argiope bruennkhi lays on average 800 eggs per sac (Rollard 1985; Kohler & Schaller 1987; Miyashita 1996). Larvae of T. ornata feed on spider eggs and develop very quickly to fifth instars, and in this inactive stage they overwinter inside the spiders’ egg sacs (Rollard 1985). Little is knov/n about the phenology of this parasitoid from spring to autumn. Oehlke & Sacher (1991) indicated that T. ornata is univoltine, but based on the biology of its other hosts (Yu et al. 2012), e.g., Nuctenea umbratka (Clerck, 1757), it is highly probable that it is at least bivoltine. Although T. ornata is known as a gregarious parasitoid (Fitton et al. 1988; Sacher 1988, 2001), we recorded mainly single specimens of it in egg sacs. We also noticed that not all of the parasitized egg sacs were destroyed. Rollard (1985) indicated that total destruction of spider eggs occurred only when there was more than one larva of T. ornata in a cocoon. According to Cortes et al. (2000), Tromatobia sp., as a parasitoid of Araneus granadensis (Keyserling, 1864), also destroys only a portion of the contents of the egg sac. We recorded P. brachycerus as a gregarious parasitoid inside the pupae of T. ornata. According to these data and the earlier suggestion of Fitton et a!. (1987) that P. brachycerus attacks the primary parasitoid during the pupal stage, we think it should be labelled as a pseudohyperparasitoid. In contrast to hyperparasitoids, which parasitize the larvae of other parasitoids while they are feeding on or in the primary host, pseudohyperparasitoids attack the primary parasitoid after it has completed feeding on its host (Quicke 2015). Of course, detailed studies on the biology of this parasitoid wasp are needed. Pediobius brachycerus is a parasitoid of some species of Ichneumonidae which parasitize spider eggs (Kostro-Ambroziak & Table 1. — Egg sac parasitism of Argiope bruennkhi in three regions differing in climate conditions and time of settling by the spiders: the Suwalki Lake District (SLD), the Mazovian Lowland (ML) and the Sandomierz Valley (SV). Region N of studied egg sacs N and (%) of egg sacs parasitized by T. ornata N and (%) of T. ornata pupae parasited by P. brachycerus Suwalki Lake District (SLD) 220 15 (6.8%) 6 (33.3%) Mazovian Lowland (ML) 220 0 0 Sandomierz Valley (SV) 120 7 (5.8%) 6 (75%) Total 560 22 (3.9%) 12 (46.15%) WAWER & KOSTRO-AMBROZIAK— EGG SAC PARASITISM Wawer 2015), but T. onuita is recorded for the first time as its I secondary host. To summarize, in our study the overall mortality of A. hruennichi induced by its egg parasitoids was relatively low. Additionally, a high level of undeveloped eggs both in the parasitized and unparasitized egg sacs suggests that other factors, such as unfavorable wintering conditions (temperature, humidity) or fungal penetration, may have a significant impact on the mortality and life history of this range expanding spider. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS • We would like to express special thanks to Beata Ostrowiecka (Institute of Biology, University of Bialystok) for her help in laboratory work. We are grateful to Dr. Giselher Grabenweger (Agroscope, Institute for Sustainability Sciences, Zurich) for deter¬ mination of Eulophidae specimens. LITERATURE CITED , Allard, C. & M.W. Robertson. 2003. Nematode and dipteran endoparasites of the wolf spider Pardosa inilvina (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 31:139-141. Austin, A.D. 1985. The function of spider egg sacs in relation to parasitoids and predators, with special reference to the Australian fauna. Journal of Natural History 19:359-376. Becker, von H. 1983. Studies in to the biology of the wasp like spider {Argiope hruennichi Scopoli) (Araneae: Araneidae). Zoologischer Anzeiger 210:14-33. Bednarz, S. 1966. Nowe stanowiska tygrzyka paskowanego Argiope hruennichi Scop. (Argiopidae) w Polsce na Dolnym Slasku. Przeglad Zoologiczny 10:179-185. ; Bergthaler, G.J. 1995. The cocoon of Argiope hruennichi (Scopoli, ’ 1772) - a SEM-study. Pp. 22-26. In Proceedings of the 15th European Colloquium of Arachnology. (V. Ruzicka, ed.). Institute of Entomology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Ceske Budejovice. Boucek, Z. 1965. Studies of European Eulophidae. IV: Pediohius Walk, and two allied genera (Hymenoptera). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 36:5-90. Bratli, H. & L.O. Hansen. 2004. The wasp spider Argiope hruennichi (Scopoli, 1772) (Araneae, Araneidae) observed in Norway. Norwegian Journal of Entomology 51:183-185. Cortes, J.P., E.F. Daza & E. Palacio. 2000. Registro de Tromatohia ■ sp. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) como parasitoide de huevos de ; la arana Arcmeus granadensis (Araneae: Araneidae). Folia En- i tomologica Mexicana 28:2-4. ! Fahringer, J. 1922. Hymenopterologische Ergebnisse einer wissen- ! schaftlichen Studienreise nach der Tiirkei und Kleinasien (mit ; AusschluB des Amanusgebirges). Archiv fiir Naturgeschichte A j 88:149-222. ' Finch, O.D. 2005. The parasite complex and parasite-induced mortality of spiders (Araneae) in a Central European woodland. I Journal of Natural History 39:2339-2354. Fitton, M.G., M.R. Shaw & A.D. Austin. 1987. The Hymenoptera I associated with spiders in Europe. Zoological Journal of the ! Linnean Society 90:65-93. Fitton, M.G., M.R. Shaw cfe I.D. Gauld. 1988. Pimplinae Ichneumon- flies Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae (Pimplinae). Vol. 7, Part 1. In Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects. (P.C. Bernard, R.R. Askew, eds.). Royal Entomological Society, London. Foelix, R. 2011. Biology of Spiders. 3‘^‘* ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Guttmann, R. 1979. Zur Areaientwicklung und Okologie der Wespenspinne (Argiope hruennichi) in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und den angrenzenden Landern (Araneae). Bonner zoologische Beitrage 30:454^86. 249 Hickling, R., D.B. Roy, J.K. Hill, R. Fox & C.D. Thomas. 2006. The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Global Change Biology 12:450-455. Hieber, C.S. 1985. The “insulation” layer in the cocoons of Argiope aurantia (Araneae: Araneidae). Journal of Thermal Biology 10:171-175. Hieber, C.S. 1992. Spider cocoons and their suspension systems as barriers to generalist and specialist predators. Oecologia 91:530- 535. Hughes, L. 2000. Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15:56-61. Ivinskis, P., J. Rimsaite, H. Ostrauskas & L. Taluntyte. 2009. Alien insects and spider species and species spreading naturally in Lithuania. Pp. 451-455. In 5th International Vilnius Conference EURO Mini Conference “Knowledge-Based Technologies and OR Methodologies for Strategic Decisions of Sustainable Develop¬ ment”. (M. Grasserbauer, L. Sakalauskas, E.K. Zavadskas, eds.). Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Publishing House “Tech- nika”, Vilnius. Jonsson, L.J. & P. Wilander. 1999. Ar getingspindeln, Argiope hruennichi, etablerad i Sverige? Entomologisk Tidskrift 120:17-21. Kajak, A. & J. Luczak. 2003. Paj^iki - znaczenie, liczebnosc, sklad, rozmieszczenie przestrzenne. Pp. 533-538. In Kampinoski Park Narodowy. Przyroda Kampinoskiego Parku Narodowego. (R. Andrzejewski, ed.). Kampinoski Park Narodowy, Izabelin. Kohler, G. & G. Schaller. 1987. Untersuchungen zur Phanologie und Dormanz der Wespenspinne Argiope hruennichi (SCOPOLI) (Araneae: Araneidae). Zoologische Jahrbiicher (Systematik) 114:65-82. Koponen, S., N.R. Fritzen, T. Pajunen & P. Piirainen. 2007. Two orb- weavers new to Finland — Argiope hruennichi and Neoscona adicinta (Araneae, Araneidae). Memoranda Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 83:20-21. Kostro-Ambroziak, A. & W. Wawer. 2015. Pediohius hrachycerus (Thomson, 1878) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae): a re-discovered parasitoid in Polish fauna with a new host record. Journal of the Entomological Research Society 17:1-7. Kumschick, S., S. Fronzek, M.H. Schmidt-Entling & W. Nentwig. 2011. Rapid spread of the wasp spider Argiope hruennichi across Europe: a consequence of climate change? Climatic Change 109:319-329. Leborgne, R. & A. Pasquet. 2005. Time of oviposition and reproductive success in Argriope hruennichi (Araneae: Araneidae). European Journal of Entomology 102:169-174. Miyashita, K. 1996. Nymphal development and egg sac production of Argiope hruennichi (SCOPOLI). Acta Arachnologica 45:163-167. Oehlke, J. & P. Sacher. 1991. Speziation bei Parasitoiden am Beispiel von Schlupfwespen (Ichneumonidae: Pimplinae). Mitteilungen des Zoologischen Museums Berlin 67:169-176. Polls, G.A., S.D. Hurd, C.T. Jackson & F. Sanchez-Pinero. 1998. Multifactor population limitation: Variable spatial and temporal control of spiders on Gulf of California islands. Ecology 79:490- 502. Quicke, D.L.J. 2015. The Braconid and Ichneumonid Parasitoid Wasps: Biology, Systematics, Evolution and Ecology. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester. Rollard, C. 1985. Sur le developpement et la biologic d’un Hymenoptere Tromatohia ornata (Ichneumonidae) consommateur des oeufs de FAraignee Argiope hruennichi (Argiopidae). Bulletin de la Societe Scientifique de Bretagne 57:143-148. Rolland, C. 1987. La biocenose associee aux Araneides en landes armoricaines. Etude des relations Insectes-Araignees. PhD. Thesis, University of Rennes, France. Rollard, C. 1990. Approche eco-biologique de Finteraction araignee insecte/arachnophage a travers Fexemple d' Argiope hruennichi (Ar., 250 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Argiopidae) ITromatohki ornata (Hym., Ichneumonidae). Bulletin de la Societe Zoologique de France 115:379-385. Sacher, P. 1988. Eiparasitierung bei Argiope brueimkhi (Scopoli) durch die Schlupfwespe Tromatohia onuita Gravenhorst. Pp. 104- 108. In XI Europaisches Arachnologisches Colloquium, Berlin 1988 (J. Haupt, ed.). Technische Universitat Berlin, Dokumenta- tion Kongresse und Tagungen 38. Sacher, P. 2001. Beitrage zur Biologic von Tromatohia ornata (Gravenhorst, 1829) und Tromatohia ovivora (Boheman, 1821) (Hym., Ichneumonidae, Pimplinae). Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte 45:73-82. Schlinger, E.I. 1993. The biology of Acroceridae (Diptera): True endoparasitoids of spiders. Journal of Small Exotic Animal Medicine 2:119-123. Schwarz, M. 2001. Revision der westpalaearktischen Arten der Gattungen Gelis Thunberg mit apteren Weibchen und Thaumato- gelis Schwarz (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Teil 4. Linzer Biologische Beitrage 33: 1 1 1 1-1 1 55. Smith, M.A., J. Fernandez-Triana, R. Roughley & P.D.N. Hebert. 2009. DNA barcode accumulation curves for understudied taxa and areas. Molecular Ecology Resources 9:208-216. Topping, C.J. 1997. The construction of a simulation model of the population dynamics of Lepthyphantes tenuis (Araneae: Linyphii- dae) in an agroecosystem. Pp. 65-77. In Arthropod Natural Enemies in Arable Land III. The Individual, the Population and the Community. (W. Powell, ed.). Aarhus University Press, Aarhus. Urbahski, J. 1935. Paj^k Argiope hruennichii Scop, w Ludwikowie. Wydawnictwo Okr^gowego Komitetu Ochrony Przyrody na Wielkopolsk? i Pomorze 5:134-136. Walther, G.-R., E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel, C. Parmesan, T.J.C. Beebee et al. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389-395. Wawer, W. 2012. Uwagi o wystepowaniu ekspansywnego paj^ka Argiope bruennichi (Scop.) oraz towarzysz^cych paj^kow siecio- wych w Beskidach. Nowy Pamigtnik Fizjograficzny 7:45-51. Wawer, W. 2014. Biological and environmental determinants of the expansion of the spider Argiope bruennichi (Scopoli, 1772). Ph.D. Thesis, Museum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa. Yu, D.S, K. van Achterberg & K. Horstmann. 2012. World Ichneumonoidea 2011. Flash drive version. Taxapad, Vancouver, Canada. Manuscript received 9 September 2015, revised 12 April 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:251-253 SHORT COMMUNICATION Endosymbiotic Rickettsiales (Alphaproteobacteria) from the spider genus Amaurobioides (Araneae: Anyphaenidae) F.S. Ceccarelli', C,R. Haddad^ and M.J. Ramirez’: 'Division de Aracnologia, Museo Argentine de Ciencias Naturales, Av. Angel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR - Buenos Aires, Argentina; E-mail: saracecca@hotmail.com; ^Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, P. O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa Abstract. Endosymbiotic bacteria are commonly found in terrestrial arthropods and their effects have been studied extensively. Here we present the first recorded case of endosymbiotic bacteria found in the spider family Anyphaenidae. A fragment of the cytochrome oxidase c subunit I “barcoding” region belonging to unidentified Rickettsiales, presumably belonging to the genus Rickettsia, was sequenced from six individuals of Amaurobioides africana Hewitt, 1917. Keywords: Bacteria, barcoding, intertidal The gram-negative proteobacteria are one of the most widespread and diverse groups of bacteria, including medically important pathogens, free-living nitrogen-fixing organisms, and the order Rickettsiales, which contains obligate intracellular bacteria such as Wolhachia and Rickettsia that can be found living inside the cells of terrestrial arthropods (Ferla et al. 2013). These two genera have been the subject of numerous studies in arachnids, as they represent important pathogens in some cases (e.g.. Paddock et al. 2010), while in others they are endosymbionts that manipulate their host’s physiology, behavior and/or bias the host’s sex ratio to favor their transmission (Rowley et al. 2004; Goodacre et al. 2006; Duron et al. 2008; Gunnarsson et al. 2009; Wang et al 2010; Vanthournout et al. 2011; Goodacre & Martin 2012, 2013). R/rA'ctti/a-infected spiders have also been shown to display increased long-distance dispersal tendencies (Goodacre et al. 2009). Bacterial endosymbionts are usually transferred vertically in spiders, although there is evidence for horizontal transfer in closely related taxa (Baldo et al. 2008). Early methods of detection of bacterial endosymbionts in insects and spiders relied on staining techniques (Cowdry 1923). With the advent of PCR-sequencing techniques, molecular detection of specific endosym¬ bionts was made possible with relative ease, in the case of spiders resulting in targeted studies (e.g., Baldo et al. 2008; Jin et al. 2013) or sometimes as a byproduct of a study with a different aim (e.g., Rezac et al. 2014 in Dysdera microdouta Gasparo, 2014). With bacteria-specific primers, amplification of endosymbiont DNA from potential host tissue provides positive results only for infected hosts. On the other hand, more “universal” primers may find the annealing sites in both host and symbiont, if said sites are conserved enough for the genomic region. One such case appears to be the “barcoding” fragment of the Cytochrome Oxidase C subunit I (COI), a protein-coding gene that appears to have its origins deep within the origins of life on the planet (Castresana et al. 1994). The fact that COI has highly conserved regions means that certain primers can be used across a wide range of organisms to amplify the same gene region. This is advantageous if the tissue used for DNA extraction exclusively belongs to one species. However, in the case of organisms hosting endosymbionts, this could be seen as a complication, although for large-scale barcoding studies, it has been shown to be manageable (Smith et al. 2012). As part of a larger study on the intertidal anyphaenid genus Amaurobioides O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1883 (Araneae: Anyphaeni¬ dae) (Ceccarelli et al. in prep.), DNA was extracted from leg tissue of 19 individuals of A. africana Hewitt, 1917 and approximately 630 base-pairs of the COI gene fragment were amplified and sequenced using the primers LCOI 1490 (Folmer et al. 1994) and HCOoutout (Prendini et al. 2005). For six out of the 19 individuals, the sequenced COI region did not belong to the targeted host species, but to an unknown species of the order Rickettsiales, presumed to be an intracellular symbiont. There was no variation in the nucleotides of the six sequences obtained, indicating that the A. africana individuals in this study were all infected with the same bacterial species. The sampling localities of the six infected specimens are shown in Fig. la and the COI sequences have been deposited in GenBank (accession numbers KU600819-KU600824). The identification of the Rickettisales COI sequences amplified in this study was based on comparisons to sequences available in the public databases International Barcode of Life Database (BOLD systems; http://www.boldsystems.org/) and GenBank (http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). The information available from BOLD was minimal (the level of identification provided was to the order Rickettsiales) and there were cases of misidentification in GenBank, as the BLAST-quened sequences from this study were 99% identical to COI sequences labelled as “Hymenoptera sp.”, while the correct identification as proteobacteria started at 90% identity. At this point, questions relating to why non-bacterial primers preferentially amplified COI regions of endosymbionts rather than host DNA in this study — even resulting in clean sequences (rather than a mix of host and symbiont amplicon) — remain largely unanswered. A visual inspection of the priming sites revealed that 9 Rickettsiales COI sequences downloaded from GenBank had 80-90% identity in the last 10 base-pairs towards the 3' end of the forward and reverse primers. This base-pair identity, coupled with the possibility of a very high number of endosymbiotic Rickettsiales, may have been enough to give initial preference and later exclusivity to the bacterial over the host DNA for primer annealing and DNA amplification during PCR. As mentioned earlier, the presence of endosymbionts is not thought to interfere with DNA barcoding of arthropods when using universal primers (Smith et al. 2012). However, the possibility still exists that COI sequences of endosymbionts are obtained when in fact the target organism is the host, as shown in this study, along with other isolated cases (e.g., Rezac et al. 2014) and the presence of misidentified Rickettsiales COI sequences in GenBank (where the target organism was the host and thus the identification was placed as Hymenoptera sp.). Of the COI sequences in GenBank from Rickettsiales (all belonging to the genus Rickettsia) with an identity score >75% for the sequences from this study, ten were selected for Bayesian phylogenetic analyses, along with a sequence from a closely related genus (Orientia, based on Weinert et al. 2009), four sequences of Wolhachia and a sequence belonging to Anaplasma, to root the tree. The COI sequences were 251 252 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY South Africa iKiniiaBgi 30°Wi qiWolbachia sp. (gb JN625825) W^Wolbachia sp. (gb JN625g52) Ti Wolbachia sp. (gb KF490376) Wolbachia sp. feb JN625947) R felis (gb CP000053) feR monacensis (emb LN794217) • ^R rickeUsii (gb CP006010) lR a/far/ (gb CP000847) gR australis (gb CP003338) i » R prowazekii (emb AJ235271)i ■-R. canadensis (gb CP003304) R£ie///7(gbCP000849) NEW SEQUENCE (gb KU600822) lEW SEQUENCE (gb KU600824) EW SEQUENCE (gb KU600823) EW SEQUENCE (gb KU600820) EW SEQUENCE (gb KU600821) New sequence (gb KUSOOSIS) Rickettsia sp. (gb KF005604) Rickettsia sp. (emb HE583223), / (emb AM494475) " 0.09 subst./site Anapfasma marginale (gb CP001079) Figure 1. — a. Map showing localities where Rickettsiales-infected specimens of Amaurobioides africana were collected; b. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of COI sequences for selected Rickettsia species and specimens from closely related genera, obtained from the NCBI database. Nodal support in Bayesian posterior probability (PP) represented by filled (0.95 < PP <= 1) and empty {0.9 < PP <= 1) circles. GenBank accession numbers are shown after taxon names in brackets. Terminal taxa labelled as NEW SEQUENCE are from this study. Colored boxes around taxon names represent host classes (blue = Insecta; red and yellow = Arachnida; arachnid orders: red = Acari; yellow = Araneae); c. Genera! habitus of A. africana', d-e. Rock faces in the intertidal zone at De Hoop Nature Reserve, showing abandoned retreats (arrows) of A. africana (d), and at Jeffrey’s Bay, showing sealed retreats of A. africana (e). Photos: C.R. Haddad. aligned using TranslatorX (Abascal et a!. 2010) and a partitioning strategy along with nucleotide substitution models for each partition (TrNef+I, TrN+G and TrN+I-K5 for COI T', 2"^^ and 3''*^ codon positions, respectively) chosen by PartitionFinder v.l.l.I (Lanfear et al. 2012). A Bayesian phylogenetic tree was obtained by forming a consensus of 20,000 trees (minus 10% burn-in) from 20 million generations of Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations performed in MrBayes v. 3.2.3 (Ronquist et at. 2012). Based on the phylogenetic tree obtained (Fig. lb), the sequences from this study belong to an unidentified Rickettsia species, closely related to a Rickettsia species infecting the spider Dysdera microdonta. Apart from being confident that A. africana can harbor the endosymbiont Rickettsia, a more in- depth study is required to fully understand the distribution, ecology and biology of the endosymbionts detected in this study. Of particular interest in this relationship is the biology of the host spiders, which are exclusively found in the intertidal zone of rocky shores in marine habitats (Fig. !c). The spiders regularly construct their silken retreats in rock faces (Fig. Id, e), which they seal with silk CECCARELLI ET AL.— RICKETTSIALES IN AMAUROBIOIDES AFRICAN A 253 during high tide to avoid immersion in salt water, emerging at low tide to forage (Lamoral 1968). Therefore, transmission of the symbionts through the water medium in which the spiders occur seems unlikely. Apart from the most likely transmission pathway of the endosymbionts in A. africana being vertical transmission, the possibility of horizontal transmission should not be ruled out at this stage; a plausible additional explanation may be the transmission of the endosymbionts during ingestion of prey tissues, such as isopods, amphipods and dipterans that occur in the intertidal zone (Lamoral 1968). Further, the possibility that the same endosymbionts may infect various other spiders and pseudoscorpions occurring in the ^ intertidal zone in South Africa (Lamoral 1968; Haddad & Dippenaar- : Schoeman 2009; Larsen 2012; Owen et al. 2014), and the platygastrid wasp egg parasitoid of the only other truly exclusive intertidal spider in South Africa, Desis fonnidabilis (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1890) : (Desidae), viz. Echthrodesis lamorali Masner, 1968 (Owen et al. 2014), requires further investigation. Nevertheless, this study represents the first record of Rickettsiales in anyphaenids and is a contribution towards a broader understanding of proteobacteria in spiders. , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Candice Owen (Rhodes University, Grahamstown) and Dawn Larsen (Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town) are thanked for the loan of recently collected specimens that contributed towards this study. This study was supported from grant PICT 2011-1007 from ANPCyT and a postdoctoral fellowship from CONICET. LITERATURE CITED Abascal, F., R. Zardoya & M.J. Telford. 2010. TranslatorX: multiple alignment of nucleotide sequences guided by amino acid transla- ; tions. Nucleic Acids Research 38:W7-W13. ' Baldo, L., N.A. Ayoub, C.Y. Hayashi, J.A. Russell, J.K. Stahlhut & J.H. Werren. 2008. Insight into the routes of Wolhachia invasion: high levels of horizontal transfer in the spider genus Ageleiwpsis '■ revealed by Wolbachia strain and mitochondrial DNA diversity. Molecular Ecology 17:557-569. Castresana, J., M. Lubben, M. Saraste & D.G. Higgins. 1994. Evolution of cytochrome oxidase, an enzyme older than atmo- : spheric oxygen. The EMBO Journal 13:2516-2525. Cowdry, E.V. 1923. The distribution of Rickettsia in the tissues of insects and arachnids. Journal of Experimental Medicine 37:431- 456. I Duron, O., G.D.D. Hurst, E.A. Hornett, J.A. Josling & J. ■ Engelstadter. 2008. High incidence of the maternally inherited bacterium Cardinium in spiders. Molecular Ecology 17:1427-1437. ; Ferla, M.P., J.C. Thrash, S.J. Giovannoni & W.M. Patrick. 2013. ! New rRNA Gene-based phylogenies of the alphaproteobacteria I provide perspective on major groups, mitochondrial ancestry and I phylogenetic I instability. PLoS ONE 8(12):e83383. Folmer, O., M.B. Black, W. Hoch, R.A. Lutz & R.C. Vrijehock. ! 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial Cyto- 1 chrome c Oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. ; Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3:294-299. j Goodacre, S.L. & O.Y. Martin. 2012. Modification of insect and i arachnid behaviours by vertically transmitted endosymbionts: i infections as drivers of behavioural change and evolutionary novelty. Insects 3:246-261. Goodacre, S.L. & O.Y. Martin. 2013. Endosymbiont infections in spiders. Pp. 93-105. In Spider Ecophysiology. (W. Nentwig, ed.). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. : Goodacre, S.L., O.Y. Martin, D. Bonte, L. Hutchings, C. Woolley, K. Ibrahim et al. 2009. Microbial modification of host long¬ distance dispersal capacity. BMC Biology 7:32-39. Goodacre, S.L., O.Y. Martin, C.F.G. Thomas & G.M. Hewitt. 2006. Wolbachia and other endosymbiont infections in spiders. Molec¬ ular Ecology 15:517-527. Gunnarsson, B., S.L. Goodacre & G.M. Hewitt. 2009. Sex ratio, mating behaviour and Wolbachia infections in a sheetweb spider. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 98:181-186. Haddad, C.R. & A.S. Dippenaar-Schoeman. 2009. A checklist of the non-Acarine Arachnids (Chelicerata: Arachnida) of the De Hoop Nature Reserve, Western Cape Province, South Africa. Koedoe 51(#149):l-9. Jin, Y., C. Deng, H. Qiao, Y. Yun & Y. Peng. 2013. Molecular detection and phylogenetic relationships of three symbiotic bacteria in spiders (Araneae) from China. Entomological News 123:225-236. Lamoral, B.H. 1968. On the ecology and habitat adaptations of two intertidal spiders, Desis fonnidabilis (O.P. Cambridge) and Amawobioides africanus Hewitt, at “The Island” (Kommetjie, Cape Peninsula), with notes on the occurrence of two other spiders. Annals of the Natal Museum 20:151-193. Lanfear, R., B. Calcott, S.Y.W. Ho & S. Guindon. 2012. Partition- Finder: Combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitu¬ tion models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29:1695-1701. Larsen, N. 2012. Predatory behaviour of Afrotropical Palpimanidae. Newsletter of the African Arachnological Society 25:9. Owen, C.A., J.A. Coetzee & S. van Noort. 2014. Distributional range of the South African maritime spider-egg parasitoid wasp, Echthrodesis lamorali (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae: Scelioninae). African Invertebrates 55:323-332. Paddock, C.D., P.-E. Fournier, J.W. Sumner, J. Goddard, Y. Elshenawy, M.G. Metcalfe et al. 2010. Isolation of Rickettsia parkeri and identification of a novel spotted fever group Rickettsia sp. from Gulf Coast ticks (Amblyomma nuicidatnm) in the United States. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76:2689-2696. Prendini, L., P. Weygoldt & W.C. Wheeler. 2005. Systematics of the Damon variegatus group of Africa whip spiders (Chelicerata: Amblypygi): evidence from behavior, morphology and DNA. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 5:203-236. Rezac, M., F. Gasparo, J. Krai & P. Heneberg. 2014. Integrative taxonomy and evolutionary history of a newly revealed spider Dysdera ninnii complex (Araneae: Dysderidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 172:451-474. Ronquist, F., M. Teslenko, F. van der Mark, D.L. Ayres, A. Darling, S. Hohna et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61:539-542. Rowley, S.M., R.J. Raven & E.A. McGraw. 2004. Wolbachia pipientis in Australian spiders. Current Microbiology 49:208-214. Smith, M.A., C. Bertrand, K. Crosby, E.S. Eveleigh, J. Fernandez- Triana et al. 2012. Wolbachia and DNA barcoding insects: patterns, potential, and problems. PLoS ONE 7:e36514. Vanthournout, B., J. Swaegers & F. Hendrickx. 2011. Spiders do not escape reproductive manipulations by Wolbachia. BMC Evolu¬ tionary Biology 11:15-12. Wang, Z-Y., C. Deng, Y-L. Yun, C. Jian & Y. Peng. 2010. Molecular detection and the phylogenetics of Wolbachia in Chinese spiders (Araneae). Journal of Arachnology 38:237-241. Weinert, L.A., J.H. Werren, A. Aebi, G.N. Stone & F.M. Jiggins. 2009. Evolution and diversity of Rickettsia bacteria. BMC Biology 7:6-20. Manuscript received 15 December 2015, revised 25 January 2016. 2016. Journal of Arachnology 44:254-255 INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS (revised December 2015) All manuscripts are submitted online at http://www.editorialmanager.com/'arachiio General; The Journal of Arachnology publishes scientific articles reporting novel and significant observations and data regarding any aspect of the biology of arachnid groups. Articles must be scientifically rigorous and report substantially new information. Submissions that are overly narrow in focus (e.g., local faunal lists, descriptions of a second sex or of a single species without additional discussion of the significance of this information), that have poorly substantiated observa¬ tional data, or that present no new information will not be considered. Book reviews will not be published. Manuscripts must be in English and should use the active voice throughout. Authors should consult a recent issue of the Journal of Arachnology for additional points of style. Manuscripts longer than three printed journal pages (12 or more double-spaced manuscript pages) should be prepared as Feature Articles, shorter papers as Short Communications. Invited Reviews will be published from time to time and unsolicited reviews are also welcomed. All reviews will be subject to the same review process as other submissions. Submission: Manuscripts should be prepared in Microsoft Word and then submitted electronically via our online system, PeerTrack (http://www.editoriaimanager.com/arachno). Peer- Track will guide you through the step-by-step process including uploading the manuscript and all of its parts. The paper can be uploaded as one piece, with tables, figures, and appendices embedded, or as text, then tables, figures, and appendices, each uploaded individually. Ultimately, Peer- Track will assemble all parts of the paper into a PDF that you, as corresponding author, will need to approve before the submission process can be completed. Supplemental Materials (see below) can also be uploaded, but they are not bundled into the PDF. Voucher Specimens: Specimens of species used in your research should be deposited in a recognized scientific institution. All type material must be deposited in a recognized collection/institution and the identity of the collection must be given in the text of the manuscript. Checklist — Common Formatting Errors is available as a PDF at http://www.americanarachnology.Org/JOA.html# instructions FEATURED ARTICLES Title page. — The title page includes the complete name, address, and e-mail address of the corresponding author; the title in bold text and sentence case; each author’s name and address; and the running head. Running head. — This should be in all capital letters, not exceeding 60 characters and spaces, and placed at the top of the title page. It should be composed of the authors’ surnames and a short title. Examples: SMITH — SALTICIDS OF PANAMA; SMITH & CRUZ— SALTICIDS. . . ; SMITH ET AL.— SALTICIDS. . . Abstract. — Length: < 250 words for Feature Articles; < 150 words for Short Communications. Keywords. — Give 3-5 appropriate keywords or phrases following the abstract. Keywords should not duplicate words in the title. Text. — Double-space text, tables, legends, etc. throughout. Except for titles and headers, all text should be left-justified. Do not add line numbers — they are automatically added by PeerTrack. Three levels of heads are used. * The first level (METHODS, RESULTS, etc.) is typed in capitals and centered on a separate line. * The second level head begins a paragraph with an indent, is in bold type, and is separated from the text by a period and a dash. * The third level may or may not begin a paragraph but is italicized and separated from the text by a colon. Use only the metric system unless quoting text or referencing collection data. If English measurements are used when referencing collection data, then metric equivalents should also be included parenthetically. All decimal fractions are indicated by a period (e.g., 3.141). Include geographic coordinates for collecting locales if possible, using one of the following formats: 0°12'32"S, 29°52T7"E or 0.2089°S, 29.8714°E. Citation of references in the text: Cite only papers already published or in press. Include within parentheses the surname of the author followed by the date of publication. A comma separates multiple citations by the same author(s) and a semicolon separates citations by different authors, e.g., (Smith 1970), (Jones 1988; Smith 1993), (Smith & Jones 1986, 1987; Jones et al. 1989). Include a letter of permission from any person who is cited as providing unpublished data in the form of a personal communication. Citation of taxm in the text: Include the complete taxonomic citation (author, year) for each arachnid taxon when it first appears in the abstract and text proper. For example, Araneus diadematus Clerck, 1757. For Araneae, this information can be found online at www.wsc.nmbe.ch. Citations for scorpions can be found in the Catalog of the Scorpions of the World ( 1758- 1998) by V. Fet, W.D. Sissom, G. Lowe & M.E. Braunwalder. Citations for the smaller arachnid orders (pseudoscorpions, solifuges, whip scorpions, whip spiders, schizomids, ricinuleids and palpigrades) can be found at museum.wa.gov.au/ catalogues-beta/. Citations for some species of Opiliones can be found in the Annotated Catalogue of the Laniatores of the New World ( Arachnida, Opiliones ) by A.B. Kury. Literature cited. — Use the following style and formatting exactly as illustrated; include the full unabbreviated journal title. Personal web pages should not be included in Literature Cited. These can be cited within the text as (John Doe, pers. website) without the URL. Institutional websites may be included in Literature Cited. If a citation includes more than six authors, list the first six and add “et al.” to represent the others. 254 INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS 255 Binford, G. 2013. The evolution of a toxic enzyme in sicariid spiders. Pp. 229-240. In Spider Ecophysiology. (W. Nentwig, ed.). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. Cushing, P.E., P. Casto, E.D. Knowlton, S. Royer, D. Laudier, D.D. Gaffin et al. 2014. Comparative morphology and functional significance of setae called papillae on the pedipalps of male camel spiders (Arachnida, Solifugae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 107:510-520. Harvey, M.S. & G. Du Preez. 2014. A new troglobitic ideoroncid pseudoscorpion (Pseudoscorpiones: Ideoroncidae) from southern Africa. Journal of Arachnology 42:105-1 10. World Spider Catalog. 2015. World Spider Catalog. Version 16. Natural History Museum, Bern. Online at http://wsc. nmbe.ch/ Roewer, C.F. 1954. Katalog der Araneae, Volume 2a. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Bruxelles. Rubio, G.D., M.O. Arbino & P.E. Cushing. 2013. Ant mimicry in the spider Myrmecotypiis iguazu (Araneae: Corinnidae), with notes about myrmecomorphy in spiders. Journal of Arachnology 41:395-399. Footnotes. — Footnotes are permitted only on the first printed page to indicate current address or other information concerning the author. Tables and figures may not have footnotes. Taxonomic articles. — Consult a recent taxonomic article in the Journal of Arachnology for style or contact a Subject Editor for Systematics. Papers containing original descriptions of focal arachnid taxa should be listed in the Literature Cited section. Tables. — Each table, with the legend above, should be placed on a separate manuscript page. Only horizontal lines (no more than three) should be included. Tables may not have footnotes; instead, include all information in the legend. Illustrations. — Original illustrations include photographs, line drawings, maps, and other graphic representations. All should be considered figures and numbered consecutively with other figures. You should ensure that all illustrations, at submission, are at high enough resolution to be useful to editors and reviewers; 300 dpi is usually sufficient. A Guide to Art Preparation for Allen Press is available as a PDF (http:// allenpress.com/system/files/pdfs/library/apmk_art_prep.pdO- At the discretion of the Editor-in-Chief, a figure can be rendered in color in the online version but in monochrome in the journal’s printed version, or in color in both versions if warranted by the figure’s context and content. Most figures will be reduced to single-column width (9 cm, 3.5 inches), but large plates can be printed up to two-columns width (18 cm, 7 inches). Address all questions concerning illustrations to the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Arachnology: Robert B. Suter, Editor-in-Chief [E-mail: suter@vassar.edu]. Legends for illustrations should be placed together on the same page(s). Each plate must have only one legend, as indicated below: Figures 1-4. A-us x-us, male from Timbuktu. 1, Left leg; 2, Right chelicera; 3, Dorsal aspect of genitalia; 4, Ventral aspect of abdomen. Scale = 1.0 mm. The following alternate Figure numbering is also acceptable: Figure la-e. A-us x-us, male from Timbuktu, a. Left leg; b. Right chelicerae; c. Dorsal aspect of genitalia; d. Ventral aspect of abdomen. Scale = 1 .0 mm. Assemble manuscript. — The manuscript should be assem¬ bled in the following sequence: title page, abstract, text, tables with legends, figure legends, figures. As noted above, at the time of submission the paper can be uploaded as one piece, with tables, figures, and appendices embedded, or as text, then tables, figures, and appendices, each uploaded individually. Supplemental materials. — Authors may submit for online publication materials that importantly augment the contents of a manuscript. These may be audio files (e.g., .mp3, .m4a, .aif, .wav), video files (e.g., .mov, .m4v, .flv, .avi), or Word documents (e.g., .doc, .docx) for large tables of data. Consult with the Editor-in-Chief if you are considering submitting other kinds of files. Audio and video files should be carefully edited before submission to eliminate leaders, trailers, and other extraneous content. Individual files may not exceed 10MB; no more than five files may be included as supplemen¬ tal materials for a manuscript. Supplemental materials will be considered by reviewers and therefore must be included at the time of manuscript submission. Supplemental materials are published online at the discretion of the editors. SHORT COMMUNICATIONS Short Communications are usually limited to 3^ journal pages, including tables and figures (11 or fewer double-spaced manuscript pages including Literature Cited; no more than 2 figures or tables). Internal headings (METHODS, RESULTS, etc.) are omitted. Short communications must include an abstract and keywords. Page charges. — Page charges are voluntary, but authors who are not members of the American Arachnological Society are strongly encouraged to pay in full or in part for their articles ($75 per journal page). Proofs.— The Journal’s expectation is that the final revision of a manuscript, the one that is ultimately accepted for publication, will not require substantive changes. Accordingly, the corresponding author will be charged for excessive numbers of changes made in the proofs. Reprints.- -Hard copy reprints are available only from Allen Press via EzReprint, a user-friendly, automated online system for purchasing article reprints. If your paper is accepted, prior to its publication you will receive an e-mail containing both a unique URL (SmartLink) from Allen Press/Yurchak Press and information about the reprint order process. Clicking on the SmartLink will take you directly to a web portal where you may place your reprint order. The email will be sent to you from: reprints@authorbilling.com. PDFs of papers published in the Journal of Arachnology are available to AAS members at the society’s web site. They are also available through BioOne (www.bioone.org) and JSTOR (www.jstor.org) if you or your institution is a member of BioOne or JSTOR. PDFs of articles older than one year are freely available from the AAS website. COVER ARTWORK Authors are encouraged to send high quality color photographs to the Editor-in-Chief to be considered for use on the cover. Images should be at least 300 dpi. •iiiTM. -ff a •>HIA 'j '■* >'■ :•' --r i i iii ni^ rrr:^tp ::i4,jj i, 1r^ fi«^iujil'A^r> adf ;... I’li ’. .'‘\‘*L''J^.~ ..Wr»3Um i4hlJtai«I(}(^>gV ' ■ * s • .... aSi** T '. ■‘‘U.-^'-' < ” '“^^nViWDn;# .Q..^ .3tk_, -•’ V i»i r. niTwi^^ . <.*((‘'li,^^ii>jj;f>‘^H('^10y.cir>.¥JI|»^ I ..!> • cy-tCu*-> 1/ ^ '., 'Mf. j «^"i!. ii..;.vjbL« OjII Jay A ' ,»rt4’ .? . o 4 P y^^trffWirSv ^('‘c.i^'i ' “ " * - >. * - » :!iir \' *■ * ^p\B4Pkh: ^ .'•-'l,r{|f/.- rT^Vy^.l P'^-.-W; VU« ' '*' HKS w*.a jy Orff* . Mnj~‘ '1^ 'V :Kl : i e%^j(g| .i,.,v.-. C.: fiiplf ffrlHoi; tti! ^iK^9tprmi^pm . v UM< ' i • .< ) '<3 u . . I, cmtfli a riTiliiiiiif fijfiiiritiftiTlfflMiflfl^ 1 1 4lf T« ■- ■ <*t di«4iijini/}iiLii^ :.7( 1 in *i>jQ> df b^K-.tpfA ♦- Af] n/t ■MW&m’i^H- .rite ^ jT5ttwf'»f> *10'‘r.«»o.^ yndlli dV'rf.‘t^4 ' »i/»rt