^ibrarB 0f tlj^ Uttis^wm OP COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY, AT HARVAKD COllEGB, CABBEUGE, MASS. ^..-^-v^ nCp--^-^^^- The gift of C/kji No. -fi, yz^L 3/. /fyf ^ XaAjTud^ /i/iDu(y(j{. oLi^ca^i. JJ-iJ Uo-->t- (zOo-U-CG.E.-e.'yt-l'CiZ. JOURNAL OF THE Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society, 1885 — 1886. TiE^iirLiD "Y":b.a_:fi.. PUBLICATION COMMITTEE: R. H. GRAVES, J. A. HOLMES, GEO. F. ATKINSON. SECRETARY: F. P. VENABLE, CHAPEL HILL, N.^C. RALEIGH: EDWARDS, KROUGHION & CO., POWER PRINTERS AND BINDERS. 1886. p p I e B R 1885—1886. President— THOMAS F. WOOD, M. D. Vice-President— W. B. PHILLIPS, Ph. D. Resident Vice-President— J. W. GORE, C. E. Sec. and Treasurer— F. P. VENABLE, Ph. D., F. C. S. PUBLISATieN eeMMITTEE R. H. GRAVES, B. Sc, C. & M. E. J. A. HOLMES, B. Agr. G. F. ATKINSON, B. Ph. TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE. Report of Vice-Presidenl . 3 Report of Secretary .... 5 Report of Tr.e.isurer ... 8 A .sketch of the Life and Scientific Work of Lewis David von Schweinitz g The Effect of Pulverization on Fertilizer Samples 27 On the Loss of Moisture in Bottled Samples 30 An Improved Wash-Bottle for Chemical Laboratories 32 Meteoroloi^ical Record at Chapel Hill for the year 1885 34 On the Determination of Potash . . . 37 Propenyl-iso-toluylen-diamme . . 40 Effect of Freezing on Standard Solutions . 43 Indian Antiquities of Caldwell County . 45 Comparison between the Washington and Atlanta Methods for the Estima- tion of Reverted Phosphoric Acid 48 Analysis Comparing the Bituminous Coals of North Carolina and Tenn.. 51 On the Effect of Using Different Amounts of Acid Phosphate in the De- termination of Soluble Phosphoric Acid . , . . 53 On the Determination (A Moisture in Commercial Fertilizers.. 54 On the Neutrality of S'^andard Ammonium Citrate 58 Octyl benzol 60 The Cigarette Beetle . . 68 Notes on the Orchard Scolytus _ _ . ............ 74 Wilmington Flora . . . 77 A Thermometer for Class Illustration ... 143 Sugar Beets from Kentucky 144 Lithographic Stone from Tennessee 145 Cyclones _ 146 JOUEI^AL OF THE Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society REPORT OF THE RESIDENT VICE-PRESIDENT FOR THE YEAR 1885-86. J. W. GORE. A brief review of the work of the Mitchell Society, for the year 1885-'86, will, it is hoped, give fresh encouragement to those who have taken an active part in its upbuilding, and help to gain the con- fidence and support of all interested in scientific work in our State; and also of others who may be willing to lend us a helping hand. But, if the Society has not advanced as rapidly as some may have expected, then this review may serve as a stimulus to greater en- deavor during the coming year, urging them to help make of the Society the agent in the progress of science that we hope and expect it to become. Regular monthly meetings have been held for hearing papers and discussing scientific questions of interest. These meetings were limited to members and invited guests as last ■year, and were always attended with interest and profit. While the attendance was usually good, yet the interest taken in the meetings by the students of the University has not been as great as we had hoped. It is a rare opportunity for them to begin taking an active part in such work as the Society encourages. While learning what others have done, it is of great importance to practice their method and acquire the habit of independent investigation. Scientific work- ers are essential to the development of the wealth of the State, and 4 JOURNAL OF THE if our young men are not trained for the work it must be done by others. The public lecture feature of our Society developed, the present year, into the University Lecture Course, consistiner of a series of public lectures throughout the session. It is very gratifying to be able to state that this has been the most prosperous year of the Society. Sixty-one papers have been read and presented. Those of a technical character will appear in the Journal, together with a few of those of more general interest. Our Society is now recognized by several other similar organiza- tions, and publications exchanged. Commendatory notices, as well as the republication of papers in other Journals, are reasons for con- gratulation and renewing of effort. Another source of encourage- ment is the growing demand for our Journal by workers in science; and the frequent testimonials we receive of its usefulness to them. Our President during the past year rendered valuable service in other ways than by contributing to the profit and interest of our meetings. His kind and timely words of cheer and counsel have been a source of pleasure and profit, and we rejoice anew that he will stand at the helm another year. With the hope that has been inspired by the measure of success already attained, the increase in the resident working force and the fairer prospects of the coming year, we trust that every one inter- ested in the prosperity of the Society and the cultivation of the spirit of science in our midst will enter upon the work of another year with renewed courage and continue with unabated interest. The present number of the Journal contains a portrait and sketch of the life of Dr. L. D. Von Schweinitz, and we hope to be able to give a portrait and biography of Prof. W. C. Kerr in the next. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY REPORT OF THE SECRETARY. F. P. VENABLE. BUSINESS MEETINGS. August 26, 1885. Prof. J. W. Gore presided. A quorum of the Council was present. The Secretary read letters of acceptance from the officers and honorary members elected at the last meeting. The death of the late President, Dr. W. C. Kerr, was announced to the Society, and a committee consisting of the Secretary and Dr. Charles Phillips was appointed to draw up resolutions expressive of the grief of the Society at the loss it had sustained. These resolutions were ordered to be published in the Journal for 1884-'1885, and to be transmitted to the family. It was resolved that a list of donors to the Library be published and an appeal for further contributions be made. On motion, the system of public lectures was placed in the hands of the Faculty of the University of North Carolina, and was no longer to be regarded as belonging distinctively to the Society's work. The Executive Committee was instructed to make arrangements for regular meetings on the third Saturday of each month, begin- ning with September and omitting December and May. Prof. Atkinson was elected to till the vacancy on the Executive Committee. May 15th, 1886. Prof. J. W. Gore in the chair. The reports of the retiring Presi- dent and Secretary were read. The following officers were elected for the ensuing year: President, Dr. Thos. F. Wood ; Vice-President, Prof. J. A. Holmes ; Secretary and Treasurer, Dr. F. P. Venable. Executive Commit- tee, Prof. J. W. Gore, Dr. W. B. Phillips, Prof. J. L. Love. On balloting for honorary members the following were elected : 6 JOURNAL OF THE Dr. H. W. Ravenel, Aiken, S. C. ; Prof. W. K. Brooks, Johns Hop- kins University; Prof. W. M. Fontaine, University of Virginia. Prof. A. M. Elliott, of Johns Hopkins University, was elected a life member. The following regular members were elected during the year: Prof. W. L. Poteat, Wake Forest College, N. C. Arthur Winslow, Esq., ..Raleigh, N. C. Prof. Wm. Cain, ._ .Charleston, S. C, Prof. W. D. Toy, University of North Carolina. Prof. Nelson B. Henry, .University of North Carolina. Dr. Thomas Hume, University of North Carolina. Gerald McCarthy,... Washington, D. C. PUBLIC MEETINGS. Natural History Lecture Room, September igth, 1885. 1. North Carolina Triassic, J. A. Holmes. 2. Analysis of Water from Durham Artesian Well, F. P. Venable. 3. Longevity of Frogs, J. A. Holmes. 4. Some New Explosives, F. P. Venable. October i-jth, 1SS5. 5. Report on the Meetings of Science Associations,. J. W. Gore. 6. The New Star in the Nebula of Andromeda, R. H. Graves. 7. Peach Tree Boring Beetle, Geo. F. Atkinson. 8. History of the Last Century of Mathematics, J. L. Love. 9. Apparatus for Filtering, H . B. Battle. 10. A Thermometer for Class Illustration, F. P. Venable. November 2$ih, 1885. 11. Progress in Meteorology and Engineering, J. W. Gore. 12. Sketch of Dr. N. M. Hentz, Geo. F.Atkinson. 13. The Condition of the N. C. Indians, ...J. A. Holmes. 14. Theories Deduced from the Occurrence of the Elements, .F. P. Venable. 15. Trap-Door Spiders, .Geo. F. Atkinson. 16. Note on the Folding of Rocks J. A. Holmes. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. / 17. Comparison between the Washington and Atlanta Methods for Estimating Reverted Phosphoric Acid, H. B. Battle. iS. Note on the Loss of Moisture in Bottled Samples, H. B. Battle. January 2']th, 18S6. 19. Chinook or Foehn Winds and Festoon Clouds, J. W. Gore. 20. Occurrence of the Diamond in North Carolina, F. P. Venable. 21. Further Observations on the Trap-Door Spider, . G. F. Atklnson. 22. History of the Geological Surveys of North Carolina, J. A. Holmes. 23. Variations in Thermometrical Observations, .F. P. Venable. 24. Effect of Pressure on Thermometers, F. P. Venable and J. W. Gore. 25. Propionyl-anhydro-iso-di-amido-toluol, J. M. PiCKEL. 26. Solubility of Alumina in Sulphuric Acid, R. Grissom. February l']ih, 1886. 27. Biographical Sketch of Dr. L. D. Von Schweinitz, 28. The Cigarette Beetle,... G. F. Atkinson. 29. Work of Dr. Emmons in connection with the N. C. Geo- logical Survey J. A, Holmes. 30. Water as a Factor in Chemical Reactions, F. P. Venable, 31. Note on the Decomposition of Potassium Cyanide, 1. H. Manning. March 17//;, 1886. 32. Uses of Electricity in Warfare, _ J. W. Gore, 33. Tidal Friction, R. H. Graves. 34. The Coast Line at Cape Hatteras, J. A. HoLMES. 35. Fire-Extinguishing Grenades, F. P. Venable. 36. The Development of Mathematics, _ J. L. Love. 37. A Nest of Ants with Domesticated Animals, G. F. ATKINSON. 38. Meteorology of Chapel Hill for 18S5, F. P. Venable. 39. Note on the Freezing of Standard Solutions, F. B. Dancy. 40. Analysis of Lithographic Stone, J. L. Howe. 41. Sugar Beet Culture in Kentucky, J. L. Howe. 42. Some New Salts of Camphoric Acid, I. H. Manning. 43. Comparative Analysis of N. C. and Tenn. Coals, H. B. Battle. 44. Chemical Examination of N. C. Species of Genus Ilex,.. F. P. Venable. April 21st, 1886. 45. The New Element Germanium, W. B. Phillips. 46. Directions for Arranging a Natural History Cabinet, G. F. Atkinson. 47. Use of Thomas' Slag as a Fertilizer, W. B. Phillips. 48. Neutrality of Ammonium Citrate for Determining Reverted Phosphoric Acid, .. ^ ^ H. B. Battle, 8 JOURNAL OF THE May igi/i, 1886. 49. Caldwell County Antiquities, J. M. Spainhour. 50. Effect of using Different Amounts of Phosphate in Deter- mining Soluble Phosphoric Acid, H. B. Battle. 51. Reversion of Soluble Phosphoric Acid, _ H. B. Battle. 52. Effect of Finer Pulverization of Fertilizer Samples ..H. B. Battle. 53. Determination of Moisture in Fertilizer Samples, H. B. Battle. 54. Action of Albumenoids on Reagents for Alkaloids, D. S. Carraway. 55. A New Lead Salt, R. Grissom. 56. Effect of Moisture on Ignition of Hydrogen by Spongy Platinum, R. S. Woodson. 57. Octyl-Benzol and its Derivations, E. A. Von Schweinitz. 58. Triassic Sandstone in North Carolina, J. A. Holmes. 59. Description and Exhibition of a Core from Diamond Drill in the Coal Region of Pennsylvania, J. A. Holmes. 60. A Theory of Cyclones, B. F. Grady, Jr. REPORT OF THE TREASURER. F. P. VENABLE. dr. cr. Balance in Treasury August ist. 1885, _ .$ 85 12 Annual fees 1884-85, 7 50 Annual fees 1885-86, 99 00 Printing Journal for i884-'85,. $ 138 15 Engravings, 24 50 Express charges, ._ 4 80 Postage, 7 55 Sales of Journals, 54 95 Special contributions, _. 1600 Balance, 87 57 $ 262 57 $ 262 57 Balance in Treasury October 1st, 1886, .$ 87 57 ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. A SKETCH OF THE LIFE AND SCIENTIFIC WORK OF LEWIS DAVID VON SCHWEINITZ. Lewis David Von Schweinitz was born at Bethlehem, North- ampton County, Pennsylvania, on the thirteenth of February, 1780. His father, Hans Christian Alexander von Schweinitz was of an an- cient and distinguished family in Silesia, in Germany, and exercised here the functions of Superintendent of the fiscal and secular con- cerns of the " Unitas Fratrum " or Moravian Brethren in North America. His mother was Dorothea Elizabeth de Watteville, daugh- ter of Baron, afterwards Bishop, John de Watteville, and of Benija, who was a daughter of Count Zinzendorf. Of the last mentioned ancestor, it may not, for reasons which will appear in the sequel, be inappropriate to make a passing reminiscence. Nicholas Lewis, Count Zinzendorf, was born at Dresden, in 1700, and was celebrated in his youth for forming religious societies, six or seven of which are said to have originated from his own efforts, and one at least to have been planned at the early age of ten years. He was associated with Watteville in founding the great mission- ary system of the " Unitas Fratrum.'''' At the age of twenty-one he became Count of Berthelsdorf, in Lusatia, by purchasing the estate appendant to that title, and soon after established there the village of Herrnhut, whence the Moravians are sometimes called Herriihutters. In prosecution of his favorite scheme, he, in con- nexion with his new colony, many of whom were natives of Mora- via, commenced the, sending of missionaries to instruct the heathen, and at the end of nine years, though their numbers did not when they first made the attempt exceed 600, had actually formed establishments in Greenland, St. Thomas, St. Croix, Surinam, Rio de Berbice, among the Indians of North America, and the Negroes of Carolina, in Lapland, Tartary, Algiers, Guinea, in the Island of Ceylon, and at the Cape of Good Hope. In his ardour for attain- NoTE. — This sketch is compiled from the memoir of von Schweinitz, by Walter R. Johnson, read before the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadel- phia in 1835, and published by the Academy, and from facts contributed by his son, Bishop Edmund de Schweinitz. The above mentioned memoir has, as a rule, been closely followed, and often exactly reproduced. The portrait of Dr. von Schweinitz, placed as frontispiece to this Journal, was presented by his family. Editor. 10 JOURNAL OF THE ing his favorite object, Zinzendorf made various journeys through Germany, Denmark, Switzerland, Holland, England and America. In 1742 he held frequent religious discourses at Germantown, in the vicinity of Philadelphia, and in the same year, in a Latin speech de- livered in Philadelphia, formally renounced his title of Count, re- sumed his original family name of von Thumsteen and became familiarly known to the Quakers of that period under the designa- tion of " friend Lewis." It was under his immediate agency that the colony at Bethlehem was founded. He did not, however, attain all his successes without undergoing, both in Europe and America, several bitter persecu- tions, but these probably served as usual only to bind his followers in a firmer union, and more effectually to insure their prosperity. After having established his plan in all the four quarters of the globe, and sent out about 1,000 individuals to proclaim his doctrines, he finally died at Herrnhut in 1760, where, we are informed, his ob- sequies were attended by 2,000 of his followers, and his body borne to the grave by 33 of those messengers of his faith who were at the time assembled there from Holland, England, Ireland, Greenland and North America. The contemplation of his example, a man who was at once the ancestor of his family and the father of his denomination, with that of other distinguished progenitors, early impressed the imagi- nation of the youthful Schweinitz with an ambition for a career of similar activity, and gave the first impulse towards the acquisition of literary and scientific eminence. The society of those friends with whom the early years of his childhood were spent was calculated to inspire him with the same affections and views which had operated on his ancestors for two generations. His mind was here imbued with those principles which, at a later period, shone forth in the purity and simplicity of his manly character. Endowed with powers of conception of no ordinary cast, he gave early indications of his bias for intellectual pursuits, and by his as- siduity more than compensated for any deficiency in the means of improvement then within his reach. The clear and explicit manner in which his juvenile ideas were expressed, encouraged his fond pa- rents to indulge the hope that he would one day become an ac- tive instrument in advancing the cause to which themselves and their predecessors had been so assiduously devoted. Being the eldest son of his parents, and at that period of delicate constitution, it is reasonable to suppose that maternal influences had much to do in ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. IV the development of his faculties. It was, moreover, on the side of his mother that he was related to Watteville and Zinzendorf, hence, we may readily suppose that from this source he derived his partial- ity for addressing to his friends short speeches and little sermons with which he is said occasionally to have amused the circle around his paternal fireside. We are aware that, in general, anticipations founded on an exhi- bition of precocious talents are apt to be signally disappointed, but when the display is that of an intellectual tendency, rather than a mere capacity for some one attainment, and when the spirit for mental labour is found capableof being directed into different chan- nels at the instance of others, and does not consist of a blind in- stinct compelling the possessor to follow some narrow path of intel- lectual effort, the augury may, we ajiprehend, be received with less doubt and uncertainty. Such was the case with Schweinitz. His mind was vigorous and his temperament enthusiastic. The first di- rection of these qualities was given by his relatives as they dwelt on the unwearied and successful exertions of his ancestors among the fraternity, in promoting whose interests he was taught to feel that it would be most honorable to excel ; the second was subsequently given by his teachers, when, by the casual exhibition and explana- tion of some specimens of natural history, they struck a vein of tal- ent, part of the same rich mind which had only here and there " cropped out " above the surface. On the 4th of July, 1787, at the age of little more than seven years, young Lewis David was placed in the institution of the Mo- ravian community, at Nazareth, where he continued for eleven years or until 1798, and where he sedulously availed himself of every op- portunity for the acquisition of knowledge. The period of instruc- tion— as generally happens when parental precepts and example ha.ve prepared the way for a relish of knowledge — was to him a sea- son of delight, a scene of his life to which he ever after reverted with peculiar pleasure. Here were formed those habits of practi- cal wisdom, which, when subsequently methodized in the schools of Germany, produced that happy balance of the faculties without which the most brilliant talents may be wasted, either on ill-di- rected efforts or on wild and fanciful theories. His powers of lan- guage, and his vein of satirical humour, were at this time occasion- ally put forth in the form of poetical effusions, turning the fruits of his leisure hours into harmless amusement for his companions. The apparent faculty with which he afterwards composed in the Latin language, induces the belief that his early classical instruc- 12 JOURNAL OF THE tion was of a very respectable order, and certain it is that the qual- ities of his heart were not neglected ; his moral character was built on the broad and liberal basis of justice, love and charity, so dis- tinctly inculcated in the doctrines of his community. In the baneful spirit of uncharitableness, he saw nothing either lovely or respectable; it never found a lodging in his heart, and he had accordingly no occasion in after life to eject so unprofitable a tenant. His first impulse towards the study of botany had been received at Nazareth, before being placed as a pupil in the institution. When a mere child, being on a visit to that place with his grand- father. Bishop de Watteville, it chanced that a specimen of the Lichen digitatus, lying on a table in one of the apartments of the school, attracted his attention and led to a few observations on its name and physiology. From this moment he dated his partiality for the beauties of the vegetable kingdom. When his abode was afterwards fixed at the school and he enjoyed the advantage of some instruction in the elements of botany from one of the teachers in the seminary, he pursued his researches in this delightful science with the most enthusiastic ardor. He seems to have been, in truth, a very child of Flora, and with the vernal breath of that divinity, to have inhaled all the benign influences which the beauty, simplic- ity and grandeur of nature's truth are everywhere fitted to inspire. A partial flora of Nazareth and its vicinity, formed at this early period, is still among his manuscript papers, and the occupation which its composition afforded to his moments of relaxation con- tinued through life to constitute the delight of his leisure hours. Such were his attainments that before the close of his connection with the Nazareth institution, young von Schweinitz was appointed to participate in the duties of instruction by taking charge of some of the junior classes in that Seminary. In 1798 his father was called to Germany whither he was attended by his family, and where the subject of this memoir, then a youth of eighteen, was in the same year established as a student in the theological institution in Niesky, in upper Lusatia. Here enjoying an intercourse with young men of decided and acknowledged talent, and entering on studies which excited a generous emulation, his fac- ulties were roused to redoubled energy and his application became proportionately intense. The late excellent J. B. de Albertini, then one of the professors in the institution, exercised a powerful influ- ence over the mind of von Schweinitz, and to the clearness and sim. ;plicity of his views, his scientific and truly philosophical ideas, was ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. I3 the subject of this sketch indebted for much of that greatness of thought and firmness of principle which carried him with success through the active duties of life. The mutual esteem thus formed between the pupil and his teacher was afterwards by similarity of pursuits and predilections, matured into the closest intimacy. While prosecuting his studies in this place von Schweinitz enjoyed, by means of his extensive connexions, an opportunity of mingling much in society, of which his cheerful and sprightly conversation rendered him the common centre of attraction. But neither in this situation nor in his subsequent foreign journeys did his feelings ever swerve from an attachment to his country; and yet it is not from him that any modern traveller has learned the practice of vilifying every country through which he passes, much less, on returning home, that of bestowing on hisown, by way of reparation, a double store of the same abuse. After completing his theological studies von Schweinitz engaged as a teacher in the Academy at Niesky, and by this means, enlarg- ing and strengthening his own acquisitions, realized the truth of the maxim, docendo discUnus, The presence of several valued friends engaged in the same pur- suits, the cultivation of his favorite department of botany, a con- nection with his cherished associates. Professor Albertini and Henry Steinhauer, (from England), and the opportunity of improving his taste for literature by various reading and frequent composition on the prominent subjects discussed in literary journals of the day, all contributed to his improvement and rendered the arduous duties of his station a pleasure rather than a burden. Scarcely any impor- tant topic in the wide field of science escaped his notice, and espe- cially did the constitution and management of the affairs of his so- cial and religious fraternity call forth from his pen many able and spirited articles. From the commencement of his residence at this place his botan- ical researches had been particularly directed to the Fungi, a de- partment previously much neglected, and in 1805 the number of new genera and species discovered by himself and Albertini was so great as to warrant the publication of a volume of about four hun- dred pages, containing the result of their united efforts. As we shall again recur to this, in connection with his other established works, it will not be necessary here to interrupt our remarks to pre- sent its peculiar merits as a scientific production. Near the close of his residence at Niesky, he began to exercise the functions of a preacher, and was, in 1807, called to the Moravian 14 JOURNAL OF THE settlement at Gnadenburg, in Silesia, where his acquisitions were turned to good account in various ways connected with his profes- sion. Besides parochial duties he again discharged the office of teacher in bringing forward many of the young men of his commu- nity who were preparing for the duties of his own calling. Upon his character as a preacher there is the less necessity that we should comment, even were this the place and were we competent to such an undertaking, because, in that capacity, his brethren hav^e already exhibited to the public a view of his meritorious labour. We would .merely state that, considered as literary performances, his sermons were characterized by the utmost simplicity, both in style and de- livery, and were addressed more to the heart than to the head. His discourses were invariably practical, not argumentative — experi- mental, not speculative. The period of which we are speaking, it will be recollected, was that of Bonaparte's continental wars, and Germany the scene of his operations. Von Schweiuitz was, therefore, with his peaceful flock, brought into immediate proximity to the actors in those tre- mendous conflicts. But, though troops were quartered in Gnaden- burg, his happy disposition and winning deportment gave him such ascendency over all ranks as to avoid causes of collision, and to ren- der nim a general favorite with strangers. In 1808 von Schweinitz was invited to Gnadau, in Saxony, where in the discharge of duties similar to those at Gnadenburg, and with equally distinguished success, he continued to be engaged until 1812, when he was appointed by his brethren general agent of their church in the Southern States of this Union. Previously to repairing to the scene of his duties he formed a matrimonial alliance, at Niesky, with Louisa Amelia le Doux, whose parents, descendants from highly respect'Able French ancestors, resided at Stettin, in Prussian Pome- rania. The continental system of Napoleon at that time rendering direct communications with this country extremely hazardous, they were compelled, in crder to embark for the United States, to take the route through Denmark and Sweden. This circumstance was not wholly without its advantage; for on arriving at Kiel, in Hol- steln, an occasion presented itself for a protracted stay, during which von Schwfinitz became acquainted with several learned men connected with the University in that place, and the mutual satis- faction was such as to induce the institution during the same year to confer on him the honorary degree of Doctor of Philosophy. About the period of their final embarkation the United States had declared war against Great Britain; the seas swarmed with priva- ELLSHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 1 5 teers, and to try their firmness still more severely, a tempestuous voyage ensued, terminating in a tremendous storm, by which their vessel was dismasted and a horrible suspense for a time hung over their destiny. A journal kept on this voyage manifests, however, the fervent and patriotic feeling which cheered the heart and buoyed up the hopes of von Schweinitz in the near prospect of extensive usefulness in the land of his nativity. The immediate scene of his duties was the establishment at Salem, Stokes County, North Carolina, where he found time to prosecute the study of botany in a dominion, scientifically speaking, all his own. His stay in North Carolina embraced a period of ten years, from 1812 to 1822. Although not a native he had a strong predilec- tion for this State, having often heard his father and grand-father speak of their visits to its early settlements, and when he became a resident he enjoyed thoroughly the life which it opened to him. His official duties were very arduous. He was a member of the Governing Board of the Moravian churches in North Carolina; a trustee of the Salem Female Academy; the administrator of the very large landed estates which the Moravian church owned in that State and which were originally purchased of Lord Granville in 1753, and at the same time he frequently preached the gospel at Salem and other places. In the midst of these duties, however, he always found time for his scientific researches. Hardly a day passed by on which he did not go out on botanical excursions in the vicinity of Salem. He extended these excursions at times as far as Raleigh. Stokes and Surry Counties be thoroughly explored. On one of these tours he discovered, among the Sameton Mountains in Stokes County, a most beautiful waterfall which for many years bore his name. Among his scientific correspondents during this period were Dr. Reichenbaeh, of Dresden; Kunze, of Leipzic; Le Conte, U. S. A.; Blumenbach, of Gottingen; Elliot, of South Corolina; Schwaeg- richen, of Leipsic; Hooker, of England, &c. It was during this period also that the Presidency of the Univer- sity of North Carolina was tendered Dr. von Schweinitz. As the acceptance of this honor would have necessitated his relinquishing his service in the Moravian church he declined it. He believed he had been called of God to engage in this service. All the traditions of his family up to his ancestor, Count Zinzendorf, were instinct with loyalty to that church and its work. The first fruits of his labor were given to the world in 1818 l6 JOURNAL OF THE through the commentaries of the Society of Naturalists at Leipsic, under the editorial care of his learned friend Dr. D. F. Schwaeg- lichen, and under the title "Synopsis Fuogorum Carolinse Supe- rioris." In the same year his duties required him to attend a meet- ing of his religious brethren at Herrnhut. On his way thitlier he visited England, France and Holland, where he established corres- pondences which were afterwards of great service, when, on his return, he began the formation of a regular herbarium. In 1821, Dr. Schweinitz published at Raleigh, N. C, a pamphlet containing a description of seventy-eight species of Hepatic Mosses. This he produced as a mere specimen of the cryptogamic flora of North America, intended to excite a more general attention among our native botanists to this undeservedly neglected branch of natu- ral history. In the same year he sent to Professor Silliman's Jour- nal his monography of the genus Viola, a valuable paper, often cited by European naturalists. At the close of this year his residence was transferred to his na- tive village, Bethlehem, where the secular office of general agent for his brethren was retained, the charge of superintending the in- stitution for the education of females accepted, and the study of his darling science unremittingly pursued. To range once more in the vigor of his scientific maturity over the same scenes in which had been sown the seeds of his usefulness, and where had budded the promises of his early youth, imparted new energy and assiduity to his efforts. The beautiful slopes and valleys about Bethlehem and Nazareth, the romantic banks of the Delaware, and the precip- itous rocks of the Lehigh, all yielded up to him a tribute of their hitherto unexplored treasures. The high estimation set upon his works by men of science had procured his election as an honorary member in several societies devoted to natural history, both in Eu- rope and America. His correspondence increased and the forma- tion of his herbarium advanced with great rapidity. In 1823 he was desired to examine and describe the plants col- lected by Mr. Say, on the expedition of Major Long to the sources of the St. Peter's river. Tiiis task he undertook with that diffidence which signalized his real merit, expressing his regret that the un- avoidable absence of Mr. Nuttali from the country should have pre- vented him from executing this undertaking, agreeably to previous arrangement, and passing on that gentleman a high and delicate eulogium. Near the close of the same year he also communicated to the Ly-^ ceum of Natural History, at New York, a valuable paper contain- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 1/ ing instructions for determining the American species of the genus Carex, a work wliich, though less imposing in appearance, must doubtless have cost more intense application and more exact powers of discriminating between specific characters than would have suf- ficed for the description of many new species of plants. In 1824, Dr. von Schweinitz communicated to the American Jour- nal of Science a short paper on the rarer plants of Easton, Pa., almost all of which, he remarks, are principally met with on shady rocks up the Delaware or at the mouth of the Lehigh. In the same year appeared his Monograph of North American Carices, Being about to embark a third time for Europe this paper, together with a large collection of the specimens from which it had been prepared, was placed in the hands of his friend, Dr. Torrey, with a desire that it might be communicated to the Lyceum of Nat- ural History, and giving him full liberty to use his discretion in the additions or alterations which it might, from subsequent discoveries of his own, seem to demand. Finding on his return that his editor had made important additions to the number of species, the honor- able mind of Dr. von Schweinitz led him to request that it should' appear as their joint production; remarking, that "the judicious and elaborate amendments he has proposed, and the mass of new and valuable matter he has added, entitle Dr. Torrey to a participa- tion in the authorship of the work." This incident is mentioned only as indicative of the feelings and dispositions of the man. The voyage undertaken this year was with a purpose similar to that of 1818, and on both occasions he exercised on the delibera- tions of his brethren at Herrnhut a decided and salutary influence. During his absence from the country his paper on the new Amer- ican Species of Spheri^e, one of the largest genera among the Fungi, was communicated to the Philadelphia Academy and appeared inj the fifth volume of the Journal. On his return, near the close of the year, his pursuits, except the superintendence of the literary institution, which he had previously relinquished, were resumed with his wonted alacrity. The great work to which he now devoted his leisure was the Synopsis of North American Fungi, which was" originally designed for publication in some of the European journals, but which he was induced to pre- sent, in 1831, for insertion among the collections of the Philosophi- cal Society of Philadelphia. Until the year 1830, the health of Dr. von Schweinitz had been excellent, and his spirits uniformly cheerful, but the various and in- creasing cares of his official station, with the sedentary employment 2 18 JOURNAL OF THE of composing a dissertation on the affairs of his community, during which his usual excursions and exercise were omitted, wrought a visible change in the state of his health ; a severe cough ensued, with other alarming symptoms, which gave his friends Just ground for apprehension. From this time his health seemed gradually to decline. The want of his accustomed occupations in the open air also depressed his spirits, and produced a marked contrast to that buoyancy which had hitherto shed its influence on all around him. A journey to the Western States, undertaken in connection with liis oflQcial duties, appeared for a short time to revive the energies of his frame. But, though externally more active and cheerful, the deep workings of disease had undermined his system, and on the morning of the 8th of February, 1834, being awakened at an early hour by a sensation of faintness, and when relieved by medical ap- plications, again relapsing for a short time into a state of repose, he fell, at the age of fifty-four years, calmly and unconsciously into the arms of death. The colloquial powers of Dr. von Schweinitz were of a high order. Humor, wit, anecdote and repartee were always at his command. In the multiplied relations with society he had contracted that ease of intercourse which tends so essentially to conciliate the kind affec- tions. Hence, though always listened to with profound respect when in the discharge of professional duties, whether as a teacher or a clergy- man, yet the sphere of his greatest usefulness was the social circle, and the familiar intercourse which he maintained with the people of his own persuasion. In the exchange of thought, the imparting of sympathy, and the expression of fraternal feeling, so habitually cherished by the class of society with which it was his fortune to be connected, and in the deep sense of responsibility under which he appears to have constantly acted, we find the immutable guarantees for that uprightness and the best explanation of that social influ- ence which characterized him. His literary attainments were those belonging to the scholar and the gentleman. He was acquainted with the Greek and spoke and wrote the English, German, French and Latin languages. Unlike most persons of German descent, he was entirely insensible to the charms of music. Our sketch of the scientific labors of the deceased must necessa- rily be confined to some leading points in the general character of his more important works. When we consider the extreme difficulty of the particular depart- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. I9 ments of botany to which Br. von Sehweinitz devoted his chief at- tention, the prodigious number of facts which he has accumulated, the vast amount of minute and delicate investigation demanded by the nature of the objects of his study, the labor of preparing for the press the materials which he had brought together; when we recollect that, with the exception of Dr. Muhlenburg, of Lancaster, no American botanist had ventured far upon this wide and unex- plored dominion of nature; and when we remember that this science was his relaxation, not his profession, his occasional pursuit, not his daily duty, we are forcibly struck with the high order of his tal- ents for the pursuit of science, and cannot but regret that more of his time and energies could not have been devoted to his favorite occupation. The botanical works of Dr. von Sehweinitz indicate not only great industry and perseverance in the collection of facts, but a judicious method in the prosecution of his labors. The synoptical tables at- tached to his several monographs are evidences of the importance attributed to this feature in his productions. His analytical table to facilitate the determination of the Carices affords another strik- ing illustration of the benefit to be derived from a systematic pur- suit of scientific studies. And since this analytical table was doubt- less the result in part of his own inductive studies, it proves that of those studies he was able to make a legitimate and profitable use, by arranging all his facts under appropriate general heads, and to point out to future inquirers in what path to pursue the labors which he himself has so happily followed. His monograph of the Carices of North America, soon after published, gave proof of the utility of this methodical arrangement. Among the most extensive and, in a scientific point of view, the most important of his labors, are those which relate to the Fungi. Four of his principal works refer to this abstruse branch of botany. Three of them, the " Conspectus Fungorum Lusatise," the "Syn- opsis Fungorum Carolin^e Superioris," and the ''Synopsis Fungo- rum in America Boreali Medea Degentium," are all, as their titles impart, written in the Latin Language. It may in the next place appear singular that so great a part of his exertions should have been devoted to the cryptogamous plants. But to this preference he had, by birthright, a sort of hereditary or derivative national title, since it is to German, Danish and Swedish botanists that we owe by far the greater part of our knowledge of that difficult department. Von Sehweinitz had in his collection of Fungi fine specimens of 20 JOURNAL OF THE the Dematium aluta, taken out of the ships of war built by our government, on Lake Erie, where, in a few years, he remarks, "this little fungulous enemy completely destroyed that fleet which had so signally vanquished the armament of Britain." (Syn. Fungor, in Am. Bor., p. 287.) In the synopsis of the " Fungi of Lusatia," the authors, with be- coming spirit, discarded the then too frequent practice of writers in changing the names of plants and adopting new synonyms, merely, as would often appear, to compel future naturalists to cite their own names in connection with the trivial specific appellations which they choose to affix to well-known objects. This course they avoided under the conviction that natural history had received, and was daily receiving, great detriment from the accumulation and confu sion of these synonyms. They, moreover, assiduously avoided superfluous repetition of the names of classes, orders, genera, and species, and gave a true syn- opsis of the department which they professed to treat. They followed the steps of Persoon, sensible that though this method may be in some points defective, it is better not to depart from so able a guide, for, they remark, "it is well known how much easier it is to find fault with our neighbor's house than to build a better and more commodious one ourselves." "A solid basis to this department of botanical science," they add, must be laid not on a sandy founda- tion, on the yaryiog freaks and fancies of the mind, but on a per- petual daily and nightly employment of microscopic observation, a diligent and oft repeated examination of the whole history of the fungus tribes, a careful perusal of authors, a comparison of their respective synonyms, and above all by the observation of living na- ture herself, as she unfolds her rich abundance in the recesses of forests, lawns and marshes; an observation which must be continued from day to day and from year to year if we would reap the true reward of our labor." At the period when von Schweinitz and Albertini wrote there had been recently broached, in some of the German Journals, particu- larly Voight's Magazine, certain monstrous hypotheses, concerning the very nature of the fungi, and " which one could scarcely credit his senses in perusing;" — hypotheses which ascribed the existence of several species of these plants to mutations of form, alleging that the Tuhulina fragiforma was nothing more than the progeny of the Phallus impudicus, which, growing old, at length became metamor- phosed into a Lichen ; thus, in the mere wantonness of authority, confounding with one scroll of the pen two great classes of the veg- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 21 etable world and blending both into the animal kingdom. Against these and many similar heresies and hallucinations the authors do not fail to caution their readers. This work was prepared under several disadvantages. The Ger- man writers on cryptogamia had, it is true, been found of great ser- vice in determining nice and difficult questions, and to them Alber- tini and von Schweinitz repeatedly acknowledged their obligations; but they had to lament that their remoteness from the richer treas- ures of scientific truth, the vast libraries of metropolitan cities, did not allow them to consult the productions of investigators who had preceded them. At a subsequent period when treating of the fungi of America, von Schweinitz was enabled to profit by the contemporary labors of those whom he is pleased to term the coryphaei of mycological science, such as Fries, Nees, Link and Kunz, and he then takes occasion to remark, that all the genera described by them are likewise found in America, and that indeed but few species are known in Europe, (ex- cept those parasitic fungi which belong to hosts not found here,) but what are equally the products of both continents. It is not perhaps among the least interesting and creditable cir- cumstance connected with the publication of this work that twelve plates containing figures of ninety-three species of new fungi were drawn, engraved and colored by the hands of von Schweinitz him- self. We are assured, by one who was at that period his pupil, that he " recollects the untiring research with which our departed friend amidst the various arduous duties of his office, (that of tutor at Niesky), pursued his favorite study, and the labor bestowed by his own hands on the colored plates of the well known ' Synopsis Fun- gorum.'' " The modesty with which the plates are submitted to the public, marks in a distinct manner, both the meritorious character of the man and the style of his Latin composition : '•' Si quis severior tabularum nostrarttin contemplator, nonnulla in Us nee fortasse pauca, desideraverit — eum, ne prima sese artis exGiisorice tirocinia unico scientice amore duce et auspice tentata co- ram^ habere obliviscatur rogatuni velimus.'''' One might hazard the opinion, that even in more recent works of natural history, many far less creditable specimens of the same art have found place without being able to urge the apology that they were the first efforts of a tyro, and without the commendatory pleas that the love of bcience had guided and ushered them into public view. In his paper on the genus Viola, von Schweinitz makes the inter- esting remark, that of all the American species of violet, thirty or 22 JOURNAL OF THE more in number, not one has an identical counterpart in any Euro- pean species; that not more than one of the latter appears to have become naturalized in America; and that while Europe possesses about twenty species of the interesting genus, America has, as above stated, already numbered thirty and probably may yet add others from future explorations of her extensive northern regions. In his descriptions of new American species of the genus Spherise, contained in the fifth volume of the Journal of the Academy, von Schweinitz states that of the 528 species which Dr. Fries describe, 330 had been observed by himself in America, and that besides what Fries had incorporated in his general abridgement, the new species amounted to 112, making the whole number then known 640; that the whole number of the American fungi, then observed (1825), fell little short of 2,000. He adds, "I am fully persuaded as many more remain undiscovered. Our immense forests, humid climate and va- riety of high rank vegetable productions, may well warrant this con- clusion." In this paper he describes twenty new species of American Sphe- rise, respecting which, he remarks, that very few peculiar to America, spring directly from the soil, that is, from vegetable mould — for none, in fact, spring solely. from 7'ocks or their unvegetalized debris. Nearly all the fungi peculiar to America are parasitic, and this, con- sidering the vast number of peculiar plants and trees of the higher orders, found in our country, may still account for the almost in- credible multitude of fung ■p9.in§lj B.I3U3S ao sapadg •— ' t/3 aad -•edsm JO sa§B(j o 5 So oo So CO So CO 2g CO ^ 6 > CO CO Z6 > CO •paquosap sapads .wa^ M M CO o in M '^ o in cn O l-H •paquosap BjauaS AV9JVJ C^ en r^ papn[out sapads JO -o^ 910I1AV o en M M en en M O en o en O in en M M O 01 CO ON o en •papnpui Bjauao JO -OMatoqAV r^ M 0^ in CO M l-C o •3?^a in O oo oo M CO l-l CO M CO l-H en (N CO en oo oo c^ ■ CO l-l in CO h-( M en oo M Q to Id 9-3 c > U t/3 CIi o C/D « > 'SI t: CO o c^ (n oci. s o o p i: r^ < C/3 »— t 13 o c 3 eS u £ 3 o 5 D O CO - '^ o K o o c o c o OS o a, CJ .^ i- w (« O a, r a.-c 1/5 u O QJ !^c>j c P- >, J> C/3 o •- d) ^ CO >-. o C ^ HJ O a, ', — ! cS o • *-H !-i o Ti bjo t/2 0) o o, C2 ^ >< o c3 Sub. lation.) A. 20 mesh, 15.04 11.86 1.28 1.50 60 m.. 10.05 4.99 12.32 .92 1.02 .48 B. 20 m., 15.68 8.16 3.77 4.46 60 m., 11.89 3-79 8.49 3-74 4.24 .22 C. 20 m., 12.83 5-35 1.62 1.86 40 m., 11.72 I. II 5-72 1.46 1.65 .21 D. 20 m., 11.46 5-07 7-15 8.07 40 m., 4.98 7.10 60 m., 5.08 7-36 100 m., 8.28 3.18 5-05 7.29 7-95 .12 E. 20 m., 10.81 3-95 3-93 4.40 40 m., 11.06 3.81 3-74 4-25 .15 60 m., 11.28 3.75 3.30 3-72 .68 100 m., 9 96 .85 3.66 3-07 3-40 1. 00 We see at once several noteworthy results attended with the pul- verization, viz : the loss of water, and the decrease of the Insoluble PoOg ; the reason for the former is obvious; the latter is due to the greater solvent action of the ammonium citrate used in its determi- nation on the finer particles caused by the pulverization. The loss of moisture has the effect of increasing the content of the other substances — a mere withdrawal of water, of course, raising other constituents — which is the case with the total P0O5, total Potash, &c., and would be so with the insoluble P2O5 were it not for the easier solution of the finer than the coarser particles. This decrease of Insol. PoO 5 is enough to counteract the increase caused by the loss of water and cause a still further decrease amounting in ex- treme cases to nearly 25 per cent, of the total amount of Insol. PgOj present in the original sample. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 29 I will add that the loss of water in A. and B. is rather excessive, part of which being due to artificial drying as the sample was too wet to pass the fine seive. It will be seen that the decrease of Insol. PoO-, in D. is very slight, only .12 per cent, from 20 to 100 mesh. I was at a loss to understand this remarkable deviation from the other results until after the de- terminations were completed, when I found from the manufacturers that the basis of the phosphate was a natural guano instead of a manipulated superphosphate. The reason then was plain — ammo- nium citrate solution acts no quicker on fine than on coarser parti- cles of raw phosphate. For the sake of comparison other results are calculated and given in Table II. TABLE II. H3O. Sol. P2O5 Insol. P.O5 Total P2O5 Rev. P2O5 Avail. P.O3 A. 20 m., 60 m.. 15.04 10.05 11.86 12.32 1.28 .92 14.98 15-76 1.84 2.52 13.70 ' 14.84 B. 20 m., 60 m., 15.68 11.89 8.16 8.49 3-77 3-74 14-74 T5-32 2.81 3-09 10.97 11.58 C. 20 m., 40 m,, 12.83 11.72 5-35 5-72 1.62 1.46 8.92 9.02 1-95 1.84 7-30 7-56 D. 20 m., 40 m., 60 m., 100 m., 11.46 S.28 5-07 4.98 5.08 5.05 7.15 7.10 7-36 7.29 13-50 13-93 1.28 1-59 6.35 6.64 E. 20 m., 40 m., 60 m., 100 m.. 10.81 11.06 11.28 9.96 3-95 3.81 3.75 3.66 3-93 3-74 3-30 3-07 10.04 10.02 10.00 10.13 2.16 2.47 2.95 3-40 6.11 6.28 6.70 7.06 From the last table we see that incident to the loss of water and decrease of Insol. PgO- is an increase of Total and consequently an increase of reverted and available P^Og, amounting in some cases to nearly one per cent. To summarize then we have for the results of pulverization of fer- tilizer samples : 1. The more perfect mixing of the separate ingredients, and the consequent susceptibility to better and fairer sampling. 30 JOURNAL OF THE 2. The loss of moisture, due partly to thfe vaporizing of water by heat generated by grinding, and partly to the action of the air on the finer particles necessarily exposed during the pulverization. 3. The decrease in content of Insoluble Phosphoric Acid caused by the more complete action of the solvent on the finer particles. 4. The increase of the Total Phosphoric Acid caused by the loss of moisture. 5. The increase of the Reverted and Available Phosphoric Acid due first to the increase of the Total, and second to the decrease of the Insoluble. The last four results are shown to be directly proportional to the fineness of the grinding. In conclusion, I would suggest the advisability of passing the fer- tilizer sample through a 40 mesh sieve, instead of 20 as is the custom now. This would give better mixing and consequently a more reli- able sample could be taken, and again the fineness obtained would more nearly approach what is required by the plant in the process of its growth. It would not have the disadvantage of the 20 mesh, nor the objection met with in the 100 mesh grinding; neither the coarse mass sampled with difficulty in the former, nor the too great loss of water in the finer particles and the greater solvent action on them in the latter. H. B. BATTLE. Laboratory N. C. Exp. Station, Raleigh, May 19th, 1886. ON THE LOSS OF MOISTURE IN BOTTLED SAMPLES. H. B. BATTTE. Frequently having had occasion to repeat a determination of total phosphoric acid in a commercial fertilizer, I almost invariable found the second determination made two or three weeks subsequent to the first to give a higher result. This variation being so constant I was forced to think that it was not the result of error of analysis, but owing to loss of moisture in the samples. The samples of fertilizers used were placed in a wide mouth bottle about 2 oz. capacity and closed with ordinary cork. Five distinct ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 31 weighings were made from each bottle which was unavoidably kept open during the process of each weighing — the bottle in the mean- time subjected to the ordinary heat of the laboratory. To test this theory of loss in moisture I selected six samples of ammoniated fertilizers entirely at random from a lot of thirty or forty. The first determination of moisture was made one hour after sampling, and the second after the lapse of one month — with the results given below : TABLE I. — Moisture at 100 C. I H our after Sampling. I Month later. I 18.64 17.83 2 17.42 15-73 3 20.12 19.40 4 16.15 15-94 5 12.03 10.70 6 16.38 15-36 TABLE II. — Decrease of Moisture. No. I has decreased in moisture in 30 days, 0.81 per cent. -1.79 - -72 - .21 -1-33 .1.02 Table II shows an invariable decrease in moisture, which has the effect of elevating the per cents, of the other constituents to a marked degree. For example, in No. 2 where the decrease is great- est, the sample contained at the time of the first weighing 9.77 per cent, total phosphoric acid. Theoretically this would be raised at the second weighing, on account of the loss of 1.79 per cent, mois- ture, to 9.98 per cent., an increase of 0.21 of total P0O5. Practi- cally this increase was found to exist, by actual analysis, 30 days after the first determination. 32 JOURNAL OF THE As a remedy to prevent this loss of moisture and consequent disar- rangement of two sets of determinations, the use of tightly fitting rubber stoppers is recommended — even then a loss is liable to occur from the frequency of the weighings and exposure to air. The neces- sity of fitting in the rubber stopper tightly after each weighing will be observed. H. B. BATTLE. Laboratory N. C. Ag. Exp. Station. AN IMPROVED WASH-BOTTLE FOR CHEMICAL LABORATORIES. H. B. BATTLE. By this simple device the washing of precipitates and the cleans- ing of vessels used in the process of analysis, which before required ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 33 the use of the ordinary wash-bottle, can now be done with much more facility and in a much shorter time. It consists essentially of a thin glass flask, C, placed about three feet abov^e the level of the working desk, closed by a three hole rub- ber stopper. Through one of these holes issues a rubber tube, D, (or glass with rubber connections) from the bottom of the flask de- scending to the desk and ending in a glass nozzle. Connection is made by a second hole in the stopper with a reservoir bottle, A, placed above the top of the wash bottle. In the third hole is placed a glass tube bent at an angle to keep out dust. On filling the flask from the reservoir — the flow being stopped by a pinch-cock — the water is started by suction from below, and the stream through the nozzle can be regulated or stopped at will by a pinch-cock placed conveniently to the hand, the height of the flask furnishing the pressure which is sustained by the siphon. A bunsen burner, H, is placed underneath the flask, and the water can be heated when it is so required — the open tube, I, allowing for the escape of steam. Hot water as well as cold can thus be used in treating precipitates. Other solutions can be employed equally as well as water, (see bot- tle F.) The advantages of this system are: 1st. The saving of much time and the consequent labor attending the use of the ordinary wash bottle, especially where several analy- ses are carried on at the same time, the exertions required by the mouth and lungs being thereby avoided. 2d. No air exists in the tube as in an ordinary wash bottle, and consequently the full force of the liquid is utilized immediately. 3d. Precipitates can be washed and small flasks cleansed much more satisfactorily than by the old system. •4th. When used with a wash solution of ammonia water no trouble is experienced with the free ammonia which ordinarily is quite hurt- ful to the mouth and eyes. The large bottle E, with the accompanying tube, shows a con- venient arrangement for holding any solution and delivering the same. Laboratory of the N. C. Aj. Eicpt. Station, Raleigh. 34 JOURNAL OF THE METEOROLOGICAL RECORD AT CHAPEL HILL FOR THE YEAR 188-5. F. P. VENABLE. The following record is a continuatioQ of that published in pre- vious Journals of the Society, (I, p. 35, II p. 50), the observations being taken under nearly the same conditions of location, instru- ments, &c., as during the years 1880-1884. Some of the facts pre- sented by the tables may be briefly pointed out and discussed: TEMPERATURE, The mean annual temperature is 57.87° as compared with 59 77^ for the preceding Ave years. It is 1.55° below the average for twen- ty-one years. The average temperature for the seasons, is Spring 56.21°, Summer 77 31°, Autumn 58,65°, Winter 39.28°. For the pre- vious five years these averages were 58 35°, 77. 25°, 61.08'^, 42.39% re- spectively. This shows a summer warmer than the average and the remaining seasons some two degrees below the average. July, the warmest month, had a mean temperature of 79.64'^, about one de- gree above the average. The warmest day of the year was July 9th, with a mean temperature of 86.25". The maximum observed was 100*^ on July 9th also. These are to be compared with 90 7° on July 12th, 1880, and 102 on July 22nd, 1883. The coldest month was February, 36.04. This is the coldest monthly mean in six years and is nearly 11 below the average for February. The coldest day was February 12th, with a daily mean of 17.50°. For January 6th, 1884, the mean was 10.50\ On February 11th the thermometer reached 9\ On December 30th, 1880, it registered -2 . The obser- vations would show then a generally cold year with a hot summer, yet one in which no great extremes of temperature were expe- rienced. HUMIDITY. The annual mean is 70.60, a little below the average. October was the month of greatest humidity and April the least. The mean saturation for Autumn is lower than usual, for the remaining sea- sons higher. RAINFALL. The total rainfall, 46.51, inches is five inches above the average, 41.64. The heaviest rainfall was during September, the total ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 35 amount being 6.45 inches. On September 21st there was a remark- able rainfall of 511 inches. This is the heaviest on record here. The nearest approach to it was on April 22nd, 1883, when 4.19 inches fell. Spring was a little below the average; Summer 4 inches be- low; Autumn 8 inches above; and winter about 2 inches above, showing a very unusual distribution of the rainfall. The summer was noted for the succession of prolonged droughts. From June 8th to July 11th, or 33 days, the fall was .43 inches; from July 24th to August 28th, or 35 days, the fall was .22 inches; from August 30th to September 20th, or 21 days, the fall was .74 inches. The August rainfall was less than half the average. WINDS AND SKY. The winds were mainly from the west and southwest, the north- east and northwest winds coming next on the list. As to clouds the rule for the year seemed to be fair days rather than those heavily clou led or entirely clear. Both the clear and cloudy days were below the average in number. The autumn, winter and early spring months have the greatest number of clear days. The cloudless observations (clear) were 402 out of a total of 1,045. The barometric range was 1.6 inches — the highest in six years. GENERAL REMARKS. The year as a whole shows wide variations from the average and is one to be remembered. The spring was very late as the expres- sion in common use goes. The first wild flowers appeared some six weeks after the date on which they were usually found. Foliation of forest trees began only on April 25th. This is several weeks late and the bare look of the trees during the month when everything is usually covered with the green spring growth was very noticeable. The succession of droughts in the summer proved of course injuri- ous to the crops, though fortunately they commenced too late for injury to the small grain, and when the corn had already a good stand and the fall rains came in time to partially save the cotton. The season seemed a fair one for tobacco. The fall was a late one free from heavy frosts, so that even tender plants remained unin- jured in the gardens long after the usual time. The leaves remained on the trees until about December 5th, and the remainder of the year was open and pleasant. The appended table needs no further explanation. F. P. VENABLE. 36 JOURNAL OF THE r^ C> -f- CO r^ d C> o "^ ^ Q "^ "P H-i" *i ^* ^" ID ino iT) O^ r^co »r> r>i ^vo r-^ ■O M M N vnco vo r~* ID O t^co r^ in M ID LD voo inco vO vnoo in in O M -^in^O^o a w I On 'ij- in I in N CO . r^ •rf en Id c^ M • en c>»_ CO en M cj inoo c) o c< CO vnco Mco O r^C>0 i^cnrj- O i O m OO NO HH inoo OO in r^ r» o O m c< '+en* • • -O 'NiHOr^. MOcnOenOr>.N^°ocoTj-c^Tt mmw Ttcnin-sroen or^-^o -1- M I^ M O r^ O c^ CO p-H en o^ en OO ^i^M r^Ti-pi M M PJ . • . • O O O M en en CI > o O CO N O O O in i-i O eno r~» M en c^ • • • • o o c^ en en M (N O r^co M en '^O^hHO^ino' iHCy>OM w OvO'^r^r>-o Mvor^r^ oo ••• • -'i-tr^.* • • •in'C^o^r^r^-i-ent~»OM ■^'^l-sOrfOcnr^QOinr^ ^ OtHinininO 0»- i^ c^r^r^r-^r^in or^Ot^ o od d^ en '^oo -^^ en'^" O^ O '^ en^' n n in-i-r^invOTf i^cooco wO^eni-iinO mOvOw in -;,„• ■r^r^^'N'^ ••••(N-enencocOMMOO'^MOr^in 9:"^^ ^KZ^'^'*^^^^^ <^^ ciencN NM w O^ •• •—•-.••Om-- ••co-Mi-ienOinencoocoi-ii-ior^ C7>'i-MOOcOnvj-i en en M w M O Cl O -Or^OO cor^>vO r^- in O r^' in i~>. en en T^ in in ino O in On "^ (N M M in^o OnnO On m '^vO On d ON M en CI r^ d r^ en in O en "*o r^ >-< inr^Ocof^O coencom r~^ • • X • : _• •^ M • • - • On • "^O "^ r^ r^ CI O c< O in Onqo O "^"9.^^'S.aNen'^^^'r-MW NCien m ci w inint~^inr^en oi^ ^O r^ r^ en r^ O "■< OnvO enco O coOnhhciOCI Oi-icoin in inr~->'* • -I— I "O r^ 'i" O cixnMCicor^r^_,coONincarvien rnci rfenrnTj-inw Ol^mr^ •^OO'ir, inO enMrl-«^ en Oenr^c^t^in enciH<-<^ r^ - ..... vn ON' • '_:co •r~~«r^ r~« i-i nO O "^t -1- t-. r^^ NOeninOwC^ cim en en "^ en in M ^ r^oo no co en O O Ci O O in inoo nO "^ oONinrtrnm vOr^Mr^cj ^ ,^ A ^ ^ •r^'^'--_:in-coOMOcienr-»TtO On eno cor^Mr^^i-ienON'^rvivn -t-^Hcn m en en ^ eno N t^co in r-> <:*• in ci en oo -t i^ i^ O ino CO d d ON en en CI \^ r^ ci -J- in d en w in On en CI CI d i-f in w enoo 0^ Tj- en O O ino ON d O ON * en en d O in -f M en -It i-< O •* r^ r^ d d O d en O rf On ON O O '^ en w O O On M en en d O en in en en en w in en HH d O CO On On d r^o O o o o> M en rn d . C C . I C - rt ca - - o C « OJ '^ 73 k-( (u ««=; <^ > > I lU 05 o >> 1 55 > •*-* eg ^ o ii 'r-! O OJ > 5 !> ^- W rt s § 5 '^ '^ '° ^ '^ s s § 1.-I J . • X c >^ C '^ J . . -• 5 3 ci S I- r^d ON^SS^ffi t^d ONSP, nearly as much in 3, next in 2. next in 4 and very faint in 5. They were all slight, but tend to show that the addition of oxalate m ly bp nf'ces.sary for an- other reason than, in the language of the eoiiiuiittee, ' to facilitate the conversion of any nitrates of potash which may be present into carbonates upon subsequent evaporation and ignition."] After add- ing the ammonium oxalate the solutions were evaporated to dryness in platinum dishes, volatile matters (amuionia salts) expelled by heating below red heat and the residues taken up in small amounts of hot water, and filtered through small filters in porcelain dishes; 2 drops HCl were added and then 10 c. c. PtCl^ solution; evaporated until mass solidified in cooling; took up in 85 per cent, alcohol and finished as laid down in a. This method of weighing I regarded as superior to all others in point of accuracy, and hence, contrary to the committee's recom- mendations, I preferred to vary from the method in this slight par- ticular, inasmuch as I do believe it advisable to wash the precipitate out with water and weigh the filter again afterwards. Furthermore I believe that the nicety of adding the reagents, drop by drop with constant stirring is in commercial analysis unnecessary. Results. — In the chemically pure K^SO^ determinations: a. gave K^PiCIh, 0.2S01 gram, ^ KoO, 54. oS per cent. ^. " " 0.2805 gram, = " 54-i6 e. " " 0.2829 S'"^'''''> = " 54-62 " The per cents are seen to be quite close together, but it is to the weights of K^PtCly that we should look, since the per cents vary according to the amount of substance taken — in this case very small, 0.1 gram. The per cent, in c is much higher than the theo- retical, but the smallness of the amount worked with must be borne in mind. The weights of K^>PtCI,; are very satisfactorily near to- gether. A tendency to high result (c) is shown probably from ex- tended manipulation introducing foreign substances into the solu- tion. 1.0 gram of substance is the amount taken in potash determina- tions in commercial fertilizers and was the amount taken in the committee's samples in this work, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Now suppose the above three weights of K^PtCl,;, instead of coming from the very small 0.1 gram, came from 1.0 instead. The corresponding per cents of K2O would be 5.41, 5.42 and 5.46, which are very satisfac- 40 JOURNAL OF THE tory results and as concordant as results obtained in most any other kind of determination. I had thought of making check determinations on my results in samples 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, but the satisfactory agreement of the re- sults of the three determinations of 1, made me consider further work unnecessary. . F. B. DANCY. Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh, N. C. PROPENYL-ISO-TOLUYLEN-AMID1NE-. (PrOPIONYL-ANHYDRO-ISO DIAMIDO-TOLUOL.) J. M. PICKEL. Amidines are, as defined by Beilstein (Handbuch der Org. Chem. p. 225), acet amides in which the atom of Oxygen is replaced by the bivalent group NR. Thus, C^Hy CONH,, an amide, becomes C^H C(NH)NHo, an amidine, when O is displaced by (NH). The H's both of the group NH and of NHg may, of course, be replaced by carbo-hydrogen radicals, e. g., CH3OH0 C—S^p'^tt! propenyl- diphenylamidine. If, instead of the two phenyl groups, we have the bivalent toluylen group, CgHgCHg, the compound becomes CH3CH2 C— NM^eHgCHg propenyltoluylenamidine. Compounds of this last class are anhydrous. Two special examples will illus- trate the two ways of making them : 1. Ortho phenylendiamine is heated with acetic acid. NHCiaCH. ^^^^NHo +CH.COIQH = ^2^ + ^«^^ NlHo CeH4^^^C.CH, x2HiO. *An abstract of experiments undertaken at the suggestion of the late Prof. Hiibner and executed in his laboratory at G6ttingen. J. M. P, ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 4 1 2. Orthonitroacetanilide is reduced, C.CH3 + HgO. It has been found that only those compounds in which the NHo group is in ortho position to the NHOC^H group are capable of forming these amhydro-bases. In the toluol and homologous series, two sets of anhydro-bases are possible. For convenience let us number the carbon-positions in the benzol- ring thus: 1 . Then with CH^ at position 1 we may have first, I** ^1 (4) N=~^-^^ ^y ^' (4) NH - ^ ^^^^ ' secondly, 5 3 \ . / (2) N= p p u or (2)NH — n p XT ^ (3)NH- ^-^-^y or ^3.^^ O.C.M,. The two sets are isomeric. The base under consideration here, Propenyl-iso-totuylen amidine, belongs to set (2). In building this base, Orthotoluidine was taken as the starting point. It was necessary to nitrate this compound in such a way as to bring the nitro group into ortlio position to the amido group. The two following principles suggest how that result was to be accom- plished: (1.) If a negative element, e. g., bromine, or a negative group, e. g., NO;., is introduced into a Benzol ring which already contains a positive group, e. g., NH. or NHCOC H^, — there will result para and ortho compounds mainly; (2.) If, however, the group or element already present is negative, a rtieta compound chiefly will be produced. Direct nitration of ortho toluidine or of ortho-acettoluide would, therefore, give a compound in which the nitro group would be in para relation to the amido group, e. g., CH3 (1), NHCOC.Hy (2), NOo (5), and which in consequence would not serve our purpose. If, however, bromine be introduced before nitration, there would result a compound in which Br would have the place assigned in the above formula to NOo. This, nitrated, would furnish a body in which the NOo group would occupy the de- sired ortho position, CH^a), NHC0C,Hy(2), NO^IS), Br(5) ; the lat- ter would now have only to be reduced and the atom of bromine 42 JOURNAL OF THE displaced by one of hydrogen, and our end would be accomplished. In accordance with the above considerations acet ortho toluide was bromated, nitrated and the acetyl-group di^^placed by the pro- pionyl* group. The resulting compound furnished, upon reduction with tin and hydrochloric acid. Propenyliso-bromtoluylenamidine, fiCH^ ricH3_ CeH^ ^'^^SZC.CH,.CH3orCeH, J jg=_C.CH,CH3. This [BmBr [BmBr base, as also its salts, crystalizes well, and was easily characterized by analysis. (Let it be designated as bromine base No. 1.) Treated in dilute alcoholic solution with amalgam of sodium it gave, after three to four weeks' boiling, Propenylisotoluylenamidine : ^ '^'^ nCHg CCH3 CeHa oNH- (.jj(.jj orC«H3 oN^ c.cH,CH3 ™' ( mN= - ■' (mJSH — ^ ^ base and its salts crystalize beautifully, and their identity was fixed by analysis and otherwise. The introduction of bromine into this compound was found easy of accomplishment; but — what is very interesting - the new bro- mine base, though containing, as the old, butjone atom of bromine, was not identical with it. The following comparison will show the points of difference and of agreement : Bromine Base No. 1. New Bromine Base. Melting point 135 6 152 3 f Water of crystalization = none. f none. Hydrochlo- ! Chlorine = 12 95 per ct. | 12 87 per ct. ricacid Salt j Soluble in 1000 parts | 1^ of water = 2.42 parts. [ 4 81 parts. Platinum Salt. f Water of trystalization = 4. 16 per ct f 4.22 per ct. I 2 Mol. I 2 Mol. ; Platinum = 21.96 per ct. -{ 21.95 per ct. I Soluble in 1000 parts | t of water = 0.9472p'rts. L 1.403 parts. *Propionyl-ortho-toluide would, but for the expense, have been used from the outset. ELISHA MrTCHELL"]JSClENTIFIC SOCIETY. 43 The b.ises differ as to melting point and solubility and are clearly isomeric. We have in this fact an intimation, at least, if nothing more, that to our base is to be assigned the formula (a) and not (b) : (a) r;H,(l)gj^=_C CH,.CH3 (b) CH3(1) |^]g^~C.CH,.CH, This conclusion is reached by regarding the group -NH- positive, and =C= negative; this granted, we should expect, bearing in mind the principles given on page 41, that (a) would give, upon broma- tion : CH., (1) {|^jj;iC.CH,.CH3, Br (6) or CH3 (1) [|'^jj=C.CH,. CH3, Br (4), (most probably the first). Either would explain the isomerism; (b), on the contrary, would give CH3 (1) [gj^^^CCH,. CH3,Br (5) which is the formula assigned to base No, 1, and is, therefore, not admissible. We therefore conclude that not (b) but (a) represents the constitution of our base. But the point cannot be regarded as settled by these considerations. Whether there exists in fact as in theory a difference such as indicated by (a) and (b) remains a ques- tion. J. M. PICKEL. State Agricultural College, Lake City, Fla. EFFFXT OF FREEZING ON STANDARD SOLU TIONS. F. B. DANCY. I desire to call attention to apparent changes which were manifest in standard acid and alkali solutions after being frozen in the cold snap in January, 1886. The solutions were those used in determining nitrogen in nitro- genous materials. One was a solution of sulphuric acid one-fourth normal (0.02 gramme SO3 in each c. c.) and the other was a solution of potassium hydrate of such a strength that one c c. of the pot- 44 JOURNAL OF THE H ash solution neutralized one c c. of the acid solution. Up to the time of freezing these solutions were in every day use in the deter- mination of nitrogen in our laboratory, had been very carefully pre- pared in the beginning (by gravimetric determinations of SO3 in the acid and careful titrations of the potash with the acid), and there was no reason to believe that any change had taken place in the so- lutions up to the time of freezing. In the cold snap alluded to both solutions froze solid and remained so several days. Some time — perhaps a week — after the solutions had thawed it became necessary to use them. That they had un- dergone any change was not thought of, in fact that they had been frozen was for the moment forgotten. When, however, I began to titrate it was evident that the solutions were no longer in equilib- rium. I then titrated successive portions of 10 c. c. of the acid so- lution. I found that it required successively in c. c. of the potash to neutralize, 11.03, 11.10, 11.10, 11.05, 11.05, 11.00, 11.02. These titrations were made on Saturday, January 23d, and, as has been stated, about a week after the solutions thawed. Appearances pointed to the phenomenon that the solutions had in melting been left in strata of different densities. Subsequent titrations seemed to confirm this. On Monday morning (January 25th) I again titra- ted three portions of 10 c. c. , each of the acid solution, both solu- tions being so far undisturbed. It required 10.85, 10.80, and 10.80 c. c. of potash respectively. I then thoroughly shook up the pot- ash solution, leaving the acid entirely undisturbed, and titrated again in the same manner. Now it required of the potash solution 11.52, 11.50, 11.50 c. c. I then thoroughly shook up the acid solu- tion and all subsequent titrations then gave 9.70; i. e., 9.70 c. c. pot- ash solution to neutralize 10.00 c. c. of acid solution. Thus it was seen that the freezing had apparently altered the strength of one or both solutions. I then determined the strength of the acid solu- tion, by precipitating the SO3 with BaCU in two separate portions of 40 c. c. each. I got weights of BaSO^ 2.2527 and 2.2532 grammes; mean, 2.25295 grs. BaSO^, equal to 0.0193412 gramme SO3 in one c. c. instead of 0.02 grs. SO3 as it was made. Hence the acid solu- tion had been apparently weakened by .00066 gramme SO 3 to the c. c. or, almost exactly had lost /o of its strength. Hence it would require only Ifi ot a c. c. of standard potash to neutralize one c. c. of this altered acid, or 9.666 ^ c. c. to neutralize 10 00 c. c. The facts show, by the titrations cited above, that 9.70 c. c. of the pot- ash were required to neutraUze 10. c. c. of the acid, and it would therefore appear that the potash solution was still standard — had ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 45 undergone no change. This was veritied by titrating the potash with a standard acid tiolution and it was found to be correct. Now it is not known whether the acid solution was or was not cor- rect up to the time of freezing, but in the absence of any good rea- son to suspect its being wrong the presumption is that it was right. Hence it would appear that the standard acid solution was weak- ened by being frozen, while the standard alkali was not aflected. But whether this be true or not it is evident that neither solution was left in a homogeneous state upon thawing. So that when stand- ard solutions freeze it is certainly necessary, upon thawing, to shake them up thoroughly, if not to examine carefully into their condi- tions as to strength. F. B. DANCY. Laboratory of the N. C. Ag. Exp. Station, Raleigh, February, 15t?i, 1886. INDIAN ANTIQUITIES OF CALDWELL COUNTY. Dr. J. M. SPAINHOUR. In the well known " Happy Valley," of Caldwell county, about a mile below Patterson and seven miles north of Lenoir, on the lands owned by Rev, T. F. Nelson, situated near the present bank of the Yadkin river, showing no appearance of elevation, was found an Indian mound containing twenty-seven skeletons. It was trian- gular in shape, forty-six feet long on the sides, twenty-nine feet wide at the extremity, tapering to a point towards the river. The mound at the time of its examination was situated immediately on the south bank of the river, but the river-channel is supposed to have formerly been further to the north than at present. On the north west side of this triangle, at the depth of about three feet, was found the remains of an old Indian " Chief," with his head north-east and feet south-west. The skeleton was l>ing on the bottom of the excavation, upon its face, the head resting in a large sea shell. The inner surface of the shell next to the face was carved with peculiar hieroglyphics. Around the neck were large beads made of sea shells. The arms were extended, bending at the 46 JOURNAL OF THE elbows, the hands resting a little more than a foot from the head on each side. Around each wrist was a bracelet, composed of copper and shell beads, alternating. Tiie copper beads presented the ap- pearance of having been hammered into thin sheets and rolled around the string, a part of which had been preserved by the oxi- dation of the copper. The copper beads were from one to two inches in length, and showed no appearance of having been cut, re sembling the lead sinkers used by a small boy on his tishing tackle. In close proximity to the bones of the right hand, which I think had grasped the handle, was an iron implement about five inches in length, and three-eighths to one-half inch in diameter, not sharp pointed, but smaller at the end away from the handle. The handle had been a piece of elk or deer horn, part of which had been pre- served by the oxidation or rusting of the iron. The left hand was resting on the convex surface of a sea shell, five inches in diameter, which contained in the concave surface about one hundred small beads of various sizes. The shell was beauti- fully carved with hieroglyphics. Under the breast was a gorget shaped implement composed of some substance resembling horn, about two and one-half inches in diameter, perforated with holes, which I suppose had been used as some kind of an ornament. Near his head, on each side, were crescent shaped copper pieces, one and three-quarter inches at their greatest diameter, which were probably used as ear ornaments. Resting on the skull were three, and near the bones of the body were two, funnel shaped copper ornaments or arrow points with trimmed edges, and showing superior workmanship to anything else found in the mound, except the carvings of the sea shells. Two of them had locks of the old warrior's hair fastened securely by the oxidation of the copper. On each side of this ''Chief," lying parallel with his body, were two skeletons, with heads resting in the concave surface of large sea shells marked with hieroglyphics, the heads lying on the side, the faces toward the " Chief " and near the extended hands of the " Chief." Around and over the "Chief" were the bones of a number of skeletons. Seven skulls could be traced distinctly, and it is proba- ble there were many others, but the bones had been disturbed, prob- ably by the plow, as the ground has been in cultivation for a long while, and the others could not be traced if there were any. Over and around these skeletons, but in close proximity, were thirty-two finely polished celts, thirty-two rubbing stones, eleven ELISIIA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 47 pipes, some of them of fine workmanship, with pieces of about twenty others, cut mica, black and red paint shaped in acorn hulls, pieces of native black lead, and many otiier stone implements of various shapes and designs, showing the veneration and esteem in which this " Chief " of the forest was held by those that loved him if such expressions can be applied to the savages of that day. To the east of the burials described, though only a few feet dis- tant, a cruel barbarity of the Indians was unearthed. There were two graves of the same kind, and a description of one will do to represent both, for they were near each other and probably buried at the same time. One skeleton immediately above the other, the upper skeleton had a large frame and was buried with the face down, the other, the skeleton of a smaller person, lying on the bot- tom of the excavatien, with arms and legs extended, and securely fastened by placing large stones on each extremity — certainly buried alive, so that they could travel to the happy hunting grounds to- gether. The other burials in the same mound were insignificant in com- parison, and are scarcely worth a description. The bones of thes: skeletons could be traced to the finger ends, by careful manipulation, in the dark river sand in which they were buried, but would crumble to pieces on being exposed to the air in a few moments. I might suggest by way of conjecture that the copper composing the ornaments was probably brought from the Lake (Superior mines, the shells from the Gulf of Mexico or the Atlantic Ocean, the mica from the ancient tunnels, found in excavating the hills of Mitchell county, the iron manufactured in some mysterious way by the In- dians from the splendid magnetic ore found in great abundance within a mila of this mound, but this would be conjecture. I leave this part of the subject to the gentlemen who have the collection in charge at the Smithsonian Institution, where these relics of antiq- uity have been placed on exhibition. 1 intend giving a further description of other interesting mounds found in the same locality. J. M. SPAINHOUR. Lenoir, N. 6'., May Sth, 1886. 48 JOURNAL OF THE A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE WASHINGTON AND ATLANTA METHODS FOR THE ES- TIMATION OF REVERTED PHOS- PHORIC ACID IN COMMER- CIAL FERTILIZERS. H. B. BATTLE. To determine the difference in results as obtained by the Wash- ington and Atlanta methods was the cause of the set of determina- tions given below : The samples taken were acid phosphates made from S. C. Rock and Navassa Rock — being regarded as types of the various manip- ulated phosphates. They were ground and mixed carefully so as to pass a ^V inch mesh sieve, and were kept in closely stoppered glass bottles during the process of the analysis. The Washington Method, as pursued in the determinations, was as follows: 2 grms. were ground in a small mortar with about 50 c. c. of water, allowed to settle, the liquid decanted on a filter and allowed to run into a 200 c. e. flask — this grinding and decanting was repeated twice, using pestle without rubber tip, and grinding moderately each time. The residue was then transferred to the fil- ter thoroughly washed. In the filtrate diluted to 200 c. c. the water soluble P.>0^ was determined in 50c. c. (= i grm.). The residue on the filter was then transferred to a flask of about 150 c. c. capacity, using 100 c. c. strictly neutral solution ammonium citrate (sp. gr. = 1.09) and placed in a bath previously heated to 40'C and kept there 40 minutes, shaking vigorously twice during the operation*— the temperature being kept constant at 40^C throughout the operation. The solution was then filtered with a pump of ordinary power, after which the residue was washed with one-half strength citrate solu- tion three times, consuming about one hour in the washing. The res- idue after being dried and ignited wasfused withNasCOs-f-KNOs and the Insoluble P-iO^ determined in the usual manner as for the Total viz: fusing, taking up with HgO and HNOg, diluting to 200 c. c, *By the strict Washington Method the flask should be shaken every five min- utes, this was reduced to twice during the 40 minutes, owing to the peculiar ro- tating bath used which is supposed to agitate the flasks slightly. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 49 50 taken out. (= ^ grm.), precip. with ammonium molybdate. Kept in bath 3 hours at 50° or 60^ then allowed to stand two or three hours in the cold, and filtered— washed with one-half strength am- monium molybdate. Dissolved in ammonia precipitated with mag- nesia mixture and allowed to stand at least five hours in the cold. Filtered and washed thoroughly with ammonia (1.9), dried, ignited and weighed. The Atlanta Method was followed as was laid down by the Con- vention at Atlanta and Philadelphia, with the exception of the treat- ment with Magnesium Nitrate for the estimation of total P0O5, which was omitted, being regarded as unnecessary, owing to the absence of organic matter in the samples. The solution vas made by strong HCl and digestion, and the method from that point pursued. In the estimation of the Citrate Insoluble P2O5, it was found impossi- ble to prevent the finer particles of the phosphate from being car ried mechanically through the filter by the washing with water after treatment with Ammonium Citrate solution. This was noticed in every case, and it is very probable that this affected the results of this particular determination. Subsequent experience with the method has found this to hi the case more or less in every instance where an Acid Phosphate is treated, being absent in the Ammoni- ated Fertilizers. In both methods the greatest care was observed and the similar determinations were made, not together but separately, as it was thought that this would test the methods and the comparison be- tween the two better than by making the determinations together, for in the latter case if any error had been made in one it would have been followed in the rest, and the treatment in whatever way it was carried out would have made the results identical in all. For this reason each duplicate determination was made at different times, and each determination therefore represented the method per se, and the comparison thus better carried out. The Result of the comparison is given in the table following. The figures in each case represent the average of two and sometimes three closely concordant duplicate determinations. W represents the Washington Method, and A the Atlanta : 50 JOURNAL OF THE HgO. Sol. PoO.,. Insol. P2O5. Total P2O5. Reverted P2O5. Available P2O5 W A W A W A W A W A Navassa Acid Phos. 9-5B 6.50 6.35 8.25 5.64 17.04 16.45 2.29 4.46 8.79 10.81 Excess. .15 2.61 .59 2.17 2.02 S. C. Acid Phos. 10. II 12 03 11.48 2.23 1.16 15.62 14.79 1.36 2.15 13-39 13.63 Excess. .55 1.07 .83 •79 .24 Comments on the Result as shown in the foregoing table: 1. As to the Water Soluble P2O3, the Washington gives higher results in every case without an exception — due most likely to the harder trituration, the better washing, and the absence of the rub- ber-tipped pestle. But in the Atlanta some of the phosphate is pre- cipitated in the flask, being washed through the filter by the first washing with water and immediately precipitated — while this is not the case in the Washington, and consequently this P2O5 is lost to the Soluble, yet it is more than counter balanced by the gain due to the trituration. 2. In the Citrate Insoluble P2O5, the Washington gives more than the Atlanta, due to three or more reasons: a. to the shorter heat- ing; h. the lower temperature; and lastly, c owing to the fact that no phosphate is washed through the filter by the citrate wash, and so no loss takes place as in the Atlanta. While this latter is not very great yet it appreciably decreases the percent. Insoluble, espe- cially in the case of finely ground acid phosphates. 3. For the Total P2O5, the Washington invariably gives higher results, varying from one-half to one per cent., the fusion with sodium carbonate and potassium nitrate very probably brought some silica in solution, and hence possibly increased the per cent, of Total P2O5. The Available P2O5 is larger in the Atlanta, varying from one- half to two per cent., and hence will come into favor very generally with the manufacturers. The Atlanta requires much shorter time than the Washington in the manipulation — in respect to Water Soluble and Citrate Insoluble but in the preliminary treatment of the Total to effect solution it was found that the Atlanta using magnesium nitrate required much more time than the fusion and was much more impracticable, owing to the ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 5 1 frequent breaking of the porcelain capsules and consequent loss of substance; after this difficulty in the subsequent precipitation, &c., the advantage was in favor of the Atlanta Method as far as time is concerned. H. B. BATTLE. Laboratory N. C. Expt. Station^ Raleigh, Oat. 21st, 1885. ANALYSES COMPARING THE BITUMINOUS COALS OF NORTH CAROLINA AND TENNESSEE. H. B. BATTLE. The high percentages of sulphur and of sa^h render bituminous coals of North Carolina inferior to others on the market, and on this account it is doubtful, even if their extent and locality would justify, whether North Carolina coal could compete with that of Tennessee or Virginia. The analyses following compare North Carolina bituminous coal with the coal of Tennessee, while other analyses are appended as a matter of interest : I. Represents the average of eleven analyses of samples of bitu- minous coal from as many different localities near Farmville, Chat- ham county. N. C. II. Shows the character of the natural coke found near the same place. III. Average of two analyses of samples from the Taylor place near Gulf, Chatham county. IV. Gives mean of two analyses of semi-anthracite from Chatham. V. Average of seven analyses of semi-anthracite from Rocking- ham county. VI. Analyses of merchantable Tennessee bituminous coal sampled from a pile of fifteen tons sold in Raleigh. ^2 JOURNAL OF THE TABLE A. Water at 115X Volatile Combustible Matter,. Fixed Carbon, Ash Sulphur, — .. Total, Specific Gravity, Weight per Cubic Yard, lbs., . I. II. 111. IV. V. Farm- Farm- Taylor Chat- Rock- ville ville Place ham ingham Bitumi- Nat'ral Bitumi- Semi- Semi- nous. Coke. nous. An. An. 1-52 .90 1-77 2 99 4.40 29.30 4-75 34-12 5.65 9.68 51-43 68.33 57-67 77-30 48.76 13.40 25.10 4-74 11.62 35-38 4 35 .92 1.70 2.44 1.78 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 I-35I 1.603 1.306 1.518 1.856 2277 2798 2245 2562 3122 VI. Ten- nessee Bitumi- nous. 1.78 35.60 58.57 342 .63 100.00 1.289 2170 It will be seen that the Sulphur and Ash are extremely high, and only in one instance (III. Taylor Place Bituminous) can the North Carolina coal compare with the Tennessee analysis, having a some- what higher percentage of each. It is also noticeable that the weight of a cubic yard of Tennessee coal is in round numbers equivalent to a long ton, while those of North Carolina, owing to the presence of a larger per cent of ash, is somewhat more. The existence of Sulphur I consider to be almost entirely due to the presence of iron pyrites. Oftentimes large glistening scales of pyrites can be seen when the coal is fractured. Besides this visible demonstration, analysis confirms this opinion, which is shown by the following table: TABLE B. Coal. Water at ii5^C.. 1.71 Vol. Com. Matter, 28.66 Fixed Carbon, 58.93 Ash,. ... 7.01 Sulphur, 369 Ash. Silica .- 1.26 Ferric Oxide 5.51 Undetermined . .. .24 7.01 Or in other words a sample of coal yields 3.69 per cent, of Sul- phur and has 7.01 per cent, of Ash (a very low percentage); if all the sulphur present were combined with iron it would give a per centaare of 6.93 of pyrites (FeSg) which in burning would give off ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 53 sulphur to form 4.61 per ceut. ferric oxide (F^^Og). Analysis of the ash shows 5.51 per ceut. Fe.Oy, allowing a sulphur of .90 percent, for other combinations, after all the iron needed by the sulphur to form FeSo is taken up. Other analys-es tend to prove the combination of Sulphur with Iron, for it is noticeable in every analysis that for a high percentage of SulphuTjthere exists a corresponding high per cent, of Ash, which would not apt to be the case were the Sulphur present in organic compounds. , H. B. BATTLE. Laboratory N. C. Ag. Expt. Station, Raleigh, Feb. IStJi, 1886. ON THE EFFECT OF USING DIFFERENT AMOUNTS OF ACID PHOSPHATE IN THE DETERMINATION OF SOL- UBLE PHOSPHORIC ACID. H. B. BATTLE. The Association of Official Agricultural Chemists adopted the fol- lowing method for the determination of Water Soluble Phosphoric Acid: " Bring 2 grms. on a filter; add a little waier, let it run out before adding more water, and repeat this treatmenr cautiously un- til no phosphate is likely to precipitate in the filter. (The washings may show turbidity after passing the filter). When the substance is nearly washed, it is transferred to a mortar and rubbtd with a rubber-tipped pestle to a homogenous pas^e (but not further pulver- ized), then returned to the filter and washed wiih water until the washings no longer react acid will deliccite test paper. Mix the washings. Take an aliquot — determine phosphoric acid. &;c." I have observed that the amount of substance taken affects the result as obtained by the above method. The substance experimented on was a finely ground acid phos- phate, passing a 60 mesh sieve, and of high grade. 2 grms. was 54 JOURNAL OF THE taken as in method, and only 1 grm. as well for the comparison and the determinations were carefully duplicated : Acid Phosphate. ^ol. PoOr^. Average. Difference. 2 grms. taken, < i o 35 ( 13.33 1 grm, taken, 5 12 82 i^ 12.72 0.39 The method was followed exactly in each cage and the final wash- ings did not react acid ; and yet by using 1 grm. a result was ob- tained 0.39 per cent, higher than that found with 2 grms. as in the Association method. What causes this difference ? Presumably because a larger surface proportion of the 1 grm. is exposed while on the filter to the action of the water than is the case with the 2 grms., and for this' reason is more completely washed and more phosphoric acid is consequently dissolved. H. B. BATTLE. Laboratory of the JY. C. Ag. Exp. Station, Raleigh, May Qth, 1886. ON THE DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE IN COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS. H. B. BATTLE. Superphosphates manufactured from phosphate rock by treat- ment with sulphuric acid contain not only hygroscopic water from the dilute acid, but also water combined with calcium sulphate formed by the chemical action. And when organic matter is added in the preparation of ammoniated phosphates, moisture is again brought into the mixture, and this is more securely retained than hygroscopic water in the plain superphosphates. The difficulty met with in driving off the different forms of moisture in its estimation is two-fold : (1) the impossibility of expelling all combined water at lOC'C, and (2), the likelihood of the oxidation of the organic mat- ter if a higher temperature is reached, and so impairing the result. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 55 (Report Phos. Acid Committee, Cbem. Bui. U. S. Dept. Agr. No. 7, p. 11.) To ascertain the time required for complete expulsion of moisture, such as is driven off at a constant temperature of 100*^C, I have in- stituted a set ef experiments, using both acid phosphates and am- moniated guanos for the comparison and heating for different inter- vals. The portions were of two grammes each, carefully weighed in watch glasses, heated in steam bath, taken out and cooled in well-fitting dessicators, weighed, returned to bath, taken out, re- weighed, &c. The heating was interrupted but I am satisfied the result was not seriously affected, as the time consumed in drying and weighing was short. The steam bath registered a constant tem- perature of a fraction less than 100°C, never more- than 100°C, so that the possibility of the oxidation of organic matter was lessened. The actual percentages of moisture found are given in Table I. A and C are acid phosphates, B, D and E are ammoniates: 56 JOURNAL OF THE < ; ; 1 1 CO 1 CI 1 CO* en . C< O « CO ', CO IT) d CO M 1 N .Ml 1 »H 1 CO 1 i en ; d I l-H ! en 1 d 1 M M CO 00 O^ -i-O I-" i-I ci IT) d co' O en .CO CO O I c< I-i ci Id CO M O en CJ M d ', d O O . r^ d c^ I c^ M I-I O M i-i . C> vC cn 1 o^ d ci I d^ CC >-( . U-) co d c^ I o ^ r^ O CO . M en o 1 o ' d c^" I d^ ' M M VO O^ M O O O CO t^ M "^O O M in o^ X^ 1-1 i-i CO O n- U-) T^ C^ Tt lo a en Tj- C^ M IT) O t^ M I-I c^ CO 1 o o en M 1 a> o M r^ . c 1 o I Tf l-H CO q a. c- 'o in O '5 < < I «- ^-> in a o c 'G CQU . 1^ 'c o B < O £ S <: s as no S P o -1-3 o u be t^ a 5 .9 Oi P a as HD P^ a a =^ 1^ o3 0) o ^ ►J 1— I w' 1— 1 W < o J w eg w si! X ; ; ; -1- 1 1 I Cl ' ' ■ o en ' ■ o M 1 • M o o . ^ o O ' M o d ; N 1 ■ o o , rf r^ 1 M M O ' M d^ I o o C) o ^ CO o in t^ CO CO o CO CO 1-1 1 o o C- ON 1-1 - o o o • X o O , o o C4 . en en ID vO • '"' o in cn 1 o o o o HI en • ?» O^ IT) OJ ■ M O -i- 0« 1 co o o ^ ci en 1^ . en CO r^ ' o O^ en i-< ! oo o o^ o o o • ^ tn en o< • oo r^ c^ o . CO c^ o en r-^ o - ^ o O ^ ' r-» o ci CO , CO o CO oo en ^ h-l h-i M en r^ in O en o CO r^ N oo CO Oco C^ o o -t O oo ■;^ U1 O^vO •T^o en O^ r^oo O O r^co Ooo O , -^ 1 CO n 1 cn N ' 1 oo' CO |_C . CO , 1 in 1 o 1 *-< '' I o OO , 01 , i-i ^ : o in CO oT ri cS ^ .G ' a, 11) &- <" oT t/5 to o ci O .2 <^ JZ A^ 2 -^ §§ 73 St. fa £ o R- r 1 fc: £ <<<<<: . (Indian Pink.) June. Flowers large red. Peniisylvanica^ IWichx. Lilliput on Cape Fear River. (Dr. McRee.) April. Petals white or rose-color. *Not given in Curtis' Catalogue of Indigenous Plants. See page 12. f Synonym for corymbosum given above. 10 90 JOURNAL OF THE Spergula arvensis, L. (Pine Cheat. Corn Spurrey.) May — August. Flowers white. Spergulariii rubra, Pers. (Sand Spurrey.) Sea-coast. May — October. Flowers red or rose. Siellaria media, Smith. (Chickweed.) Introduced. December — April. Flowers white. iiii]'flora5 Walt. Paronychia herniaiioides, Nutt. July— October. Flowers minute. Aiiychia dichotma, Michx. July— August. Flowers greenish. Stipnlioida setacea, Michx. White sand hills. Common. April — June. Flowers white. Sagiiia EUiottii, Fenzl. (Barrens Sandwort.) April— June. MALVACEAE. (MALLOW FAMILY.) Hibiscus Mosc'heiitos, L. (Swamp Mallow.) luly. Flowers while or pale rose, crimson centre. Hibiscus aciileat US, Walt. [H. Scaber, Michx.) July. Flowers white with purple centres. uiiHtaris, Cav. [H. Virginicus, Walt.) (Rose-Mallow.) Causeway and Little Bridge. July — August. Flowers rose. Malva ROTUNDIFOLTA, L. (Mallow.) Introduced. Common in waste grounds. May — August. Petals pale pink. Sida SriNOSA, L. Common about settlements. Introduced. See Abulilon. July — August. Petals yellow. [5. Abutilon, Avicenna, Gartn.'\ Elliottii, T. and G. July— October. Flowers orange yellow. Abutilon Avicenn.e, Oaert. (Velvet leaf American Hemp.) Introduced. June — July. Flowers yellow. Kosteletzkya Yirg-inica, Presl. TILIACEJE. (LINDEN FAMILY.) Tilia pubescens, Ait. (Linn or Lime Tree.) June. Flowers cream color. heterophylla, Vent. (White Linn.) Americana, L. r)r. McRee. Rocky run. S^Tilia s^labra. Vent] CAMELLIACE^. (CAMELLIA FAMILY.) Gordonia Laslanthus, L. (Loblolly Bay. Black Laurel.) July — August. Flowers white. Stuartia Virginica, Cav. Scarce. April — May. Flowers white, stamens purple. Found eight miles W. from Wilmington by Mr. Wm. VVatters. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 91 MELIACE^. JMLelia Azedarach, L. (China Tree. Pride of India.) May — June. Flowers lilac. LIN ACE JE. (FLAX FAMILY.) Linuill yirgiliiailliiii, L. (\Yild Flax.) July. Flowers yellow. Bootii, Planch. Hry pine woods. July. Flowers sulphur yellow. OXALIDACEyE. (\YOOD-SORREL FAMILY.) Oxalis stricta, L. (Yellow Wood Sorrell.) April. Flowers yellow. violacea, L. (Purple Wood Sorrell.) Dr. McRee, Rocky Point. May — June. Flowers nodding, purple. ZYGOPHYLLACE^^. (BEAN CAPER FAMILY.) Tribnlus cistoides, L. Waste grounds. Dr. McRee. Flowers large yellow. terrestris, L. Ballast. Introduced from South Russia. GERANIACEu^E. (GERANIUM FAMILY.) Geranium Caroliliianuill, L. March — April. Flowers pale purple. maculatuni, L. (Crane's Bill.) Dr. McRee. April — May. Flowers purple. BALSAMINACE^. (BALSAM FAMILY.) Inipaiicns fulva, Nntt. (Jewell Weed.) Causeway, rice fields, Little Bridge. July — September. Flowers deep orange. pallida, Nult. (Touch-me-not.) Gerald McCarthy, RUTACE^. (RUE FAMILY.) Zanthoxylum, Caroliuiannm, Lam. (Prickly Ash. Toothache Tree.) [Z. clava-Herculis, Linn.'\ June. Flowers small greenish. rtelea trifoliata, L. (IIor-TREE. Wafer-Ash.) Wrightsville Sound. May — June. Flowers greenish. mollis, .)I. A, C. May — June. Flowers greenish. 92 JOURNAL OF THE ANACARDIACE/E. (CASHEW FAMILY.) Rhus COpallina, L. (Common Sumack.) July. Flowers greenish. Toxicodendron, L. (Poison Oak.) July. Flowers small. radicans, L. (Poison Vine.) July. Flowers greenish. Rhus venenata, D. C. (Poison Sumach.) July. Flowers very small — green. puniila, Michx. (Dwarf Sumach.) Pine woods. VITACE^. (VINE FAMILY.) Vitis iestivalis, Michx. (Summer Grape.) June. Grape deep blue, very austere. Labrusca, L. (Fox Grape.) May — June. Grape purple or whitish, pleasant. Tulpiua, L. (Muscadine. Bullace.) June. Grape purple, pleasant. cordifolia, Michx, (Frost Grape.) May — June. Grape black, acid. bipinnata, Torrey & Gray. June — July. Grape small, black. Ampelopsis quiuquefolia, Michx. (Virginia Creeper.) June. Flowers inconspicuous, greenish. RHAMNACE^. (BUCKTHORN FAMILY.) Ceanolhus Americanus, L. (Red-root. Jersey Tea.) July, Flowers white. Berchemla volubilis, 1). C. (Rattan. Supple Jack.) June. Flowers small, greenish. Sag-eretia Michauxii, Brongn. Sea coast. September. Flowers white. Fraugula Caroliniana, Gray. June. celastrace.f:. (STaff-tree family.) Euonynius Aniericanus, L. (Strawberry Bush. Bursting Heart. Fish-wood.) May— June, Flowers greenish. STAPHYLLACE/E. (BLADDER-NUT FAMILY.) Staphylea trifolia, L. (Bladder Nut.) Introduced. May. Flowers white, SAPINDACE^. (SOAP-BERRY FAMILY.) .l^sculus Pavia, T. (Red Buckeye. Horse-chestnut.) March — May. Flowers red, ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 93 ACERACE^. (MAPLE FAMILY.) Acer nibrmil, L. (Red Mai>LE ) February— March. Flowers and fruit red. saLcliJirillum, Wansr. (Sugar M aple.) Rockspiin^r. Rocky Point. April and May. Neg-uiiUo aceroides, MaMicli. (Ash-leaved \L\ii.e.) Rocky Point and in Wilmington. March and April. POLYGALACE/I^. (MILKWORT FAMILY.) Polygrala cymosa, Walt. Moist savannahs. Common. July. Flowers yellowy turning dark green in drying. cruciata, L. July — October. Flowers pale rose color. iucariiata^ L. Moisl savannahs. Common. June — August. Flowers purple. lutca, L. (Batchelor's Button.) Savannahs. Abundantly common. June — August. Flowers orange yellow. rainosa5 EII. July — September. Flowers yellow. fasti^iala< Null. Not as common as others. July — October. Flowers small, bright rose color. Setacea, MicllX. March — July. Flowers pale rose color or whitish. brevifolia, Nlllt. July — October. Flowers reddish purple. ^raildiflora, Wait. July — September. Flowers bright purple. Verticillataj 1j. June — August. Flowers greenish white. leguminos.f:. (pulse family.) Aiiiorplia fruticosa, L. (Indigo Bush.) May — June. Flowers blue. Iierhacea, Walt. (A. Pubescens Willd.) June— J^uly. Flowers blue or white. Aiiipliicarpa'a moiioica, Nutt. (Pea-vine.) August — Septempter, Fk)wers white or purj)lish. Apios tuberosa, Moeiicli. (Ground nut.) This common name must not be confounded with "ground nut," the local name for Arachis hyi'ogE/E, the introduced African . " pea-nut " of commerce. July — August. Seedsblack. Flowers brtnvnish puijile. Astrag-alusarlaber, MicllX. April. Flowers white. Baptisia lauceolata^ EH. April— May. Flowers yellow. villosa, Ell. May. Plants turns black in drying. alba, R. Br. April. Flowers white. tinctoria, R. Br. (Wild Indigo.) May— June. Flowers yellow. Cassia €Iianiiecrista, L. July — August. Flowers yellow, petals often purple at the base. Marylaudica, L. (Wild Senna.) August. Flowers yellow. occidentalis. L. July. Flowers large, yellow. Obtusifolia, L. [C. Tora Linn.) July— October. Flowers yellow. nictitans^ L. (Wild Sensitive Plant.) July. Flowers pale yellow. 94 JOURNAL OF THE Cercis Canadensis, L. (Red-bud.) March. Flowers rose colored. Cratalariasa8:ittalis, L. (Rattle-box. June— July. Flowers yellow. oralis, Pursll. April — June. Flowers showy, yellow. Fursllii, 1). C May — July. Flowers yellow. Lupiuus (liffllSUS, >nlt. April — May. Flowers blue. perennis, L. (Lupine.) April — May. Flowers purplish or purplish blue. villosus, Willd. April — June. Flowers violet and roseate above. Trifolium arvense L. (Rabbit-foot Clover.) July — August. Flowers pale red. Caroliuianuni^ Miclix. (Carolina Clover.) Dr. McRee, Rocky Point. Introduced. March — May. Flowers white or purplish. pratense, L. (Red Clover.) Introduced. All summer. liybridunij L.* Gerald McCarthy. repeus, L. (White Clover.) May — September. reflexum, L. (Buffalo Clover.) April — June. Flowers rose red. PROCUMBENS, L. (Yellow Clover.) Introduced. June — July. ModicagO LUPULINA, L. (Hop. medick.) Common in grass plats. Introduced. May — October. Flowers small, yellow. deutieuiata.* G. McCarthy. Psoralea melilotoides, MicIlX. May — July. Flowers violet. canescens, Miclix. (Buck Root.) May — July. Flowers blue. Inpinellus, Miclix. May — June. Flowers. Robinia Pseud-acacia, L. (White Locust.) Introduced as shade trees from the mountains. March — April. hispida, L. (Rose Locust.) April — May. Flowers rose. var. nana, Ell. Pine Woods. Wistaria I'rutescens, I). C. (Virgin's Bower.) \Thyrsantlius friitescens. Ell.) April — May. Flowers lilac. fTeplirosia Virginiaun, Ptrs. (Rabbit Pea) July. Banner white, heel rose colored, wings red. llispiduhlj Pursll. May — August. Flowers reddish purple. anibig'Ua, M. A. C June — July. Flowers white and purple. spicata, T. «fc G. June — July. Flowers large, white and purple. Indigofera Caroliniana, Walt. (Carolina Indigo.) July — September. Flowers reddish brown. Lalhyrns paluster, Linn. June — July. Flowers blue and purple. I^var. inyrtifoliuin. Gray. .Eschynoniene hispida, Willd. {Hedysartim ?) August. Flowers small, yellow. Zoniiatetrapliylla, Michx. June— August. Flowers deep yellow. *Not given in Curtis Catalogue. fTephrosia is substiiuted as the name of this genus, following Curtis' Cata- logue of Indigenous Plants, p. 17. :|:Watson's Index, p. 230. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 95 Stylosliantlies elatior, Swartz. (Pencil Flower.) July — August. Flowers yellow. Les|)«Hleza capitata, Miclix. (Brsn Clover.) August— September. repeilS, T. & G. Common. August — September. prociimbeilS.* G. McCarthy. violacea, Persoon. July— August. Flowers. '' var. sessiliflora, Persooii. July — August. llirta^ Ell. .\ugust — .September. Flowers reddish wliite. stuvei, Nutt. IDesiiiodiuin imdinornni, Dcrandolle. {Hedysaruiji mtdifoUum , Linn.) August. Flowers small, purple. CUSpidatuin, T. k (x. August. Flowers large, purple. viridiflonini, Beck. {H. viridifoUuvi, Elliott.) August. Flowers yellow, green wlicn dry. rotlllKlifoliuin, DeCan. (//. rotundiJoUzim, Michx) August. Flowers purple. OCliroleuCUin, M. A. C. August. Flowers yellow. l)ilI(Mlii. Darlillg-toil. {Hedvsanun Marilandicum, IVilld.) July. Flowers purple. ^labelluin^ DeCail. August— September. paniculatuiu, DeCail. July — August. Flowers purple. strictllUl, DeC'ail. August. Flowers small, purple. Marilandiciliii, Boott. August. Flowers violet purple. rig'iduin, UeCail. August. Flowers violet purple. lineatuin, DeCail. Flowers and legume small. RliyilollOSia tOineiltosa, T. & 0, [Glycine tomentosa. Linn.) Flowers yellow, '' var. iiioiiophylla, T. k 0. " var. volubilis, T. k G. " var. erecta/r. &G. Glediischia triacanthos, L. (Honey Locust.) June. Flowers small, green. Clitoria Mariana, Linn. ( Vexillaria Mariana Eaton.) July — August. Flowers pale purple. Piiaseolus pereiinis, Walt. (Wild Bean ) July — August. Flowers purple and violet. diversifolius, Pers. August — October. Flowers purplish. Iiclvolus, L. August — .September. Flowers purplish. Erytlirina lierbaeea, L. April— June. Flowers deep scarlet. Galactia pilosa, Nntl.all. June— September. Flowers roseate. var. Macra>i,* M. A. C. (Watson's Index, 221 ) glabella, 31iolix. *Nol given in Curtis' Catalogue. f Generic name Desmodium subsMtuted for Hedysarum. See Cat. Lulig. Plants, p. 19. 96 JOURNAL OF THE Schraiikia aii^iislata, T. & (x. (Srnshivr Plant.) May— July. Flowers purplish. Aracliis hypog/EA, Willd. (Pea-nut. Ground-nut.) Introduced and cultivated as a crop plant. May — August. Flowers yellow. Vicia SATHA, L. (Vetch. Tare.) Introduced — cultivated grounds. April — May. Flowers pale purple. HIRSUTA, Kocll. Introduced. April — May. Flowers blueish white. tetrasi'Erma, Loisel. 3Ielilotus OFFICINALIS, Willd. (Yellow Melilot.) Naturalized about old clearings. alba. Lain. (White Melilot.) Naturalized about old clearings. relalasteiiion eor} nibosuiii, Miclix. September — October. Flowers white. Ceiltrosema Virgilliaua, Beiltli. Dry soil. June — September. ROSACEA. (ROSE FAMILY.) Agrimonia Eupaloria, L. (Feverfew.) July. Flowers yellow. parvifloraj Ait. Augast. Flowers (petals) yellow. Fniararia Virgiiiiana, Elirlieiibers". (Strawberry.). January — May. flowers white. Indica, Ait. (Indian Strawberry.) April — May. Flowers white; Oeiim album, (xinelill. (Avens.) July. Flowers small, Avhite. Polentilla Norvegica, L. Rare. Introduced. July — September. Flowers pale yellow. Canadensis, L. (Five-finger.) Very common. April — August. Flowers yellow. Rosa Carolina, L. (Swamp Rose.) Common, most in wet grounds. May — June. lacida, Ehrll. (Wild or Dwarf Rose.) Common in dry woods. May— July. rubiginosa, L. (Sweet-brier) Near settlements. Introduced. May. Flowers orange-red. L.-EviGATA, MicllX. (CHEROKEE RosE.) Meares' Bluff. April. Flowers white. Riibns villosus, Ait. (High Blackberry.) February — April. Flowers white. cuneifolins, Pnrsh. (Low Blackberry.) Common on old fields and roadsides. February — March. Flowers white. trivialis, l^Iichx. (Dewberry.) February — April. Flowers white. Prnnus Americana, Marsh. (Red Plum.) March — April. Flowers white. Chicasa, Miclix. (Chicasaw Plum.) April. Flowers white. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 97 Pruniis Caroliiiiaiia, Ait. (Mock Orange.) Dr. McRee. Seacoast of Brunswick county. Introduced as an ornanienlal shade tree. Fruit very poisonous. Spinua tomeiilosa, L. (Hardhack.) June — July. Flowers small, stamens purple. optlUrolia^ L. (Hardhack.) Ger. McCarthy. Crata^y:us spalhulata, Michx. (Narrow-leaved Thorn.) April — May, Flowers small, white. t^laiuliilosa, Miehx. (Hairy Thorn.) ttava, Alt. (Summkr Haw.) April— May. Flowers white. parvifolia, Ait. (Dwarf Thorn.) apiifolia, Miolix. (Parsley-leaved Haw.) March — April. Flowers large, white or roseate. crus-Kalli, L. (Cock's-spur Thorn.) Pyriis aiig-ustifolia. Ait. (Narrow-leavkd Crab.) March. Flowers rose purple. arbutifoiia^ L. (Chokeherry.) March— May. Flowers white. Amelancliier Canadensis, L. (Servicr Tree.) March — May. Flowers white. CALYCANTHACE.Ii. (CAROLINA ALL-SPICE FAMILY.) Calycautliiis kloridus, L. (Sweet Shrub.) Introduced. April and May. Flowers brown. MELASTOMACE/E. (MELASTOMA FAMILY.) Rliexia Mariaiia, L. June — September. Flowers purple. var. lanc-eolata. (/?. angustifoHa, Nutt.) June — August. Flowers while or pale purple. *Virginica, L. (Meadow Beauty.) July and August. Flowers bright purple. glabella, Miclix. (Deer-grass.) June — August. Flowers pale purple. luteaj Walt. June -August. Flowers yellow, Ciliosa, MicIlX. June— August, Flowers purple. lythrace.f:. (loosestrife family.) Lytkruni alatuni, Parsh. (Loosestrife.) June — July. Flowers purple. liuiare, L. June. Flowers nearly white. Nesaea vertieillata, H. B. ta erecta, L. September — October. Flowers white. Elepliautopus Carolinianus, Willd. (Elephant's Foot.) July — August. Flowers purple. tonieutOSUS^ L. {E. nudicauHs, Ell.) June. — August. Flowers pale purple. Erigeron bellidifolium, Muhl. (Robin's Plantain.) March — April. Rays blueish yellow. Ciliiadensfs, L. (Horse-weed. Hog-weed.' May — September. Rays white. Fhiladelpllicum. L. (Fleabane.) May. Rays purplish veriium, T. & G. {E. nudicaule, Michx.) April. Rays white. strig-osnm. MiiliL (Daisy Fleabane.) June. Rays white or rose. Eiipatoriuni album, L. September. aroiuatii3Um, L. (Wild Horehound.) September. Flowers white. corouopifoliuiii, Willd. (Dog Fennel.) September — October. Flowers while. foeniciilaceuiii, Willd. (Dog Fennel.) September — October. Flowers white. incarnatam, Walt. Dr. McRee. Rocky Point. September. Flowers pale purple. lljSSOpifolium, L. {E. lineari folium, Walt.) September. perfoliatuiu, L. (Wild Sage. Boneset. Thoroughwort.) September. Flowers white. serotiuuiu, Michx. September. rotuudifolium, L. August. teucrifoliuni, Willd. {E. verbence folium, Michx.) September. Flowers white. Guaphalium polycephalom, Michx. (E\ erlasting.) September — October, Flowers yellow. pnrpureum, L. (Cudweed.) April — June. Purplish scales; corolla yellow. Heleiiiuin antumnale, L. (Sneeze-weed.) August — September. Flowers yellow. quadrideiitatum, Labill. June— August. Rays yellow. ftenilifolium, Nutt. G. McCarthy, *The specific name procumbens is given by Dr. Curtis iii his "Plants around Wilmington." The only two species described by Chapman (p. 224.) The plants are erect. ■j-Not given in Curtis' Catalogue. 104 JOURNAL OF THE Heliaiithils angustifolins^ L. (Sunflower.) October. Flowers yellow. atrorubens, L. (//. sparsifolius. Ell.) September — October. Flowers yellow. Iieterophyllus, Nutt. gig-anleus, L. September. Rays yellow. animus, L.* G. McCarthy. Hieraciuni Gronovii, L. September — October. Flowers yellow. pailiculatuill, L. August — September. Flowers yellow. Iva (riltesceilS, L. (Marsh Elder.) August — September. Flowers whitish. iuibricata, Walt. Sea coast. August — September. Flowers whitish. Kri^ia A'irginU'aj Willd. March — May. Flowers yellow. Caroliuiaiia, INutt, February — March. Flowers yellow. Kiiliiiia Eiipatorioides, L. (A', critonia. Ell.) September. Flowers yellowish white. Laetiica eloiigata, 3Iulil. (Wild Lettuce.) July — September, Flowers while, purple, blue or yellow. var. graminifolia, M. A. C. fTaraxaciiiii Deu>»-Leoiiis, Desf. (Dandelion.) [Leontodon Taraxacum ) May — August. Flowers yellow. Leptopoda pnberula, Macbride. April— May. Disk yellow. :j:ftmbriatum, Gray. April— May. Disk yellow. §TriIisa odoralissiina, Cjiss. (Vanilla-plant. Dog-tongue.) July — August. Flowers purple. paniculata, Willd. September. Flowers pale purple or white. spicata, Willd. (Button Snakeroot.) August. Flowers bright purple. Ciclioriuin Intybus, L. (Chiccory.) Adventive — found in ballast. July. Flowers yellow. Liatris squarrosa, Willd, (Blazing Star.) July — August. Flowers purple. teuilifolia, Nlltt. September. Flowers purple. paucillora, Pursll. September. Flowers purple. ele^anSj Willd.* G, McCarthy, August. Flowers purple. grailliuifolia, Pursll. September. Flowers purple. Marshallia angustifolia, Pursh. July — August. Flowers purplish with blue anthers. lauceolata, Pursll April — June. Flowers purplish, Mikauia scaiideiis, Willd. (Climbing Hemi-weed.) [M. ptibesceus, Muhl.) August — September. Flowezs whitish. *Not given in Curtis' Catalogue. fin " Plants around Wilmington," 1834, this plant is marked "rare." It is now very common in the steets and elsewhere, (1880.) :}:This is omitted in "Curtis' Catalogue of Indig. Plants." §Formerly Liatris, ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 105 rolyiiinia Uvedalia, L. (Bkak's-foot.) July — Au}cnos(aeliyum, Ell. (Bi.ack-kooj.) June — July. Flowers white. >Ielantliera liastata, Mielix. August— September. liudbeckia hirta, L. (Cone flower.) July— August. Rays yellow. Seiiecio loballlS, Pers. March — April. Flowers yellow. loiiH'Utosils, 3IicIlX. April— May. Flowers yellow. Erechtliiles liieracifolia, Rafiiicsque. (Fireweed.) {Senecio hieracifolius, L.) July — September. Flowers greenish. Silpliiuui eoniposituin^ Michx. (Rosin-weed.) See note in Gray's " Flora of North America." July — September. Flowers yellow. Solidag-O C(PSia, L. September. Flowers yellow. odora, Ait. (Anise-sce.nted Golden-rod.) October. Flowers yellow. veriia, 31. A. C. Found on Duplin Road 3 to 5 miles from Wilming- ton, near Prigge's. See Map. May— June. Flowers yellow. seinpervireilS^ L. {S. HmonifoUa, Pers.) September — October. Flowers yellow. bicolor, L. September. Rays whitish. teimifolia, Plirsll. October. Flowers yellow. arg-ula, Ait. September. Flowers yellow. var. juncea. September. Flowers yellow. tortifolia. Ell. September. Flowers yellow. ^altissima, L. [S. mgosa, Ell. S. UhnifoUa. S. Uspera.) September — October. Flowers yellow. fang-UStiColia, Eli. October. Flowers yellow. Elliottil, Tor. & Gray. September. Flowers yellow. Boottii, Hook. September. Flowers yellow. pilosa, Walt. {S. pyratnidata.) September — October. Flowers yellow. puberula, Nlltt. September. Flowers yellow. var. puiveruleilta. September. Flowers yellov/. petiolaris, Ait. September. Flowers yellow. virg-ata, Michx. {Syn. S. strkta. Gray's Flora No. Am., Vol. I, Part XL p. 150.) September. Flower.s vellow! *S. pilosa, S. recurvata, all synonymous with S. rugosa. See Gray's Flora No, Am., Vol. I, Part II, p. 153. fVar. S. stricta. Gray's Flora of No. Am. Vol. I, Part II, p. 150. 12 106 JOURNAL OF THE *SoucllUS OLERACEUS, L. (Sow-THISTLE.) Introduced. June — August. Flovveis yellow. Veruoilia auglislifolia, MicllX. June— August. Floweis purple. Nova'boraceiisis, Willd. (Iron-weed.) July — September. Floweis purple. Xaiithinin strumarium, L. (Cockle-bur.) July — September. SFINO.SUM, L. (Thorny Cockle-bur.) August — September. ( (Wiocliuiuin coelestiniim, 1). C. (Mist-flower. September. Flowers blueish purple. Seriocarpus eonyzoides^ Nees. (Wihte-topped Aster.) {Aster conyzoides.) August. Disk flowers yellow. SOlidag'ilieUS, NeeS. (Aster soHdaginoides.) August. Disk flowers yellow. lortifolius, Nees. (Rattlesnake's Master.) Augiist. Dii-k flowers yellow. Acaiitliosperiiuim xanthioides, D, C. Streets of Wilmington. Introduced since 1868. Nat. from So. Am. J^ily — August. Flowers yellowish. Plucliea bifroilS, D. C. {Conyza Hfrons, Ell.) Marsh Fleabane.) September. Flowers purplish, ficlida, D. C. (Stinking Fleabane.) [C Marilandica, Ell.'\ September. Flowers purple. camphorata^ D. C. September. Flowers light purple. Taiiaeetum vulgare, L. (Tansy.) Introduced. About settlements. June — July. Flowers yellow, Artemisia caiidata, Michx. (Wild Wormwood.) September, 3liilgediiiiu acuiuinatuin, D. C. (Blue Lettuce.) [Souchus Ell.^ September. Flowers blue. Spilailthes repens, Michx, Near Wilmington. Augast. Flowers yellow, LOBELIACE/E. (LOBELIA FAMILY.) Lobelia cardiiialis, L. (Cardinal Flower.) Rice fields and river swamjjs. July — October. Flowers scarlet. Nuttallii, R. k S. {L. Kalmii, Ell.) August — September. Flowers pale blue. puberula, Michx. (Blue Lobell\.) August — September. Flowers bright blue. syphilitica, L. (Great Lobelia.) August — September. Flowers light blue. Caiibyi, Gray. paludosa, Nlltt. May — August. Flowers white or pale blue. g-landulosa, Walt. October. Flowers pale blue. amcena, Michx. September— October. Flowers bright blue. ^S. acuminatus and S. Carolinianus are not retained in Curtis' " Catalogue Indig. Plants." Seep. S4. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. lOJ CAxMPANULACE.K. (CAMl'ANULA FAMILY.) <*nui|)aniila Americana, J.. (Bei.i-i lower.) August — Septeml)er. Mowers hlue. ERICACE.E. (HEATH FAMILY.) (iayhissacia (roiiilosa, Tor. li^ Gray. (Blue HrcKLEBERRY.) {Vacciniuin Jrondosa.) April. Flowers white or redd isli.