MRKELEY LIBRARV UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EARTH PCIEN U0RAR LIFE AND LETTEES OF SIB JOSEPH PRESTWICH LIFE AND LETTERS OF SIR JOSEPH PESTWICH M.A., D.C.L., F.R.S. FORMERLY PROFESSOR OF GEOLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD WRITTEN AND EDITED BY HIS WIFE WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS EDINBURGH AND LONDON MDCCCXCIX EARTH SCIENCES LIBRARY P E E F A C E. THIS Memoir was not undertaken without anxious misgivings : it might not have been attempted but for the encouragement and prompting of Sir John Evans, who urged that I could best tell of the home life, and that the scientific publications, by the subject of the Memoir, had already spoken for themselves. I accordingly decided to do my utmost in what, it is needless to say, has been altogether a labour of love. I have to acknowledge my special indebtedness to Sir Archibald Geikie for his great kindness in writing the Summary of the Geological Work accomplished by Joseph Prestwich, as well as for the use of letters in his possession. A debt of gratitude is also due to Sir John Evans, who not only placed numerous letters at my disposal, but undertook the critical supervision of the MS., and was the helper and adviser throughout. To Professor Rupert Jones my warmest acknowledg- ments have likewise to be made for his ever kind co- operation ; and to Mr Horace B. Woodward, of the Geological Survey, I must record my gratitude for his 41 8418 VI PREFACE. invaluable assistance, without which it would not have been possible for me to accomplish what has been done : to him also is due the arrangement of the List of Published Papers. On account (except in a few cases) of the scarcity of original letters, those from friends and correspondents have been inserted when they have served to elucidate the subjects under discussion at the time. To M. Albert Gaudry, of the Institute of France, I am in- debted for his sympathy and encouragement, and also for allowing me the use of letters. To Professor Capellini of Bologna, and to Professor Louis Lartet of Toulouse, I have likewise to record my grateful acknowledgments. Professor Jules Marcou of Cambridge, Massachusetts, who took an eager interest in the preparation of this Memoir, has, alas ! not lived to witness its completion. Mr William Colchester, an old and attached friend who so lately wrote expressing his wish for the speedy pub- lication of this volume, has likewise passed away. The recent death of Sir Douglas Galton, the dear friend and companion of Joseph Prestwich in geological ex- cursions at home and abroad, has been a personal grief, and is the severance of another link with the past. Among the friends to whom I am indebted for letters and data may be mentioned the Rev. R. Ashington Bullen, the Rev. Osmond Fisher, Mr Benjamin Harri- son, Sir Joseph D. Hooker, Professor Judd, Sir John Lubbock, Mr Mansel-Pleydell, Mr S. R. Pattison, and many others. I have also to express my thanks to Dr PREFACE. Vll Henry Woodward for his ever-ready helpfulness, and for the use of the Plate for illustration of the group of the four friends — Joseph Prestwich, Professor John Morris, Mr F. E. Edwards, and Mr Searles Wood. The kindness of Mrs Lyell (author of the ' Life and Letters of Sir Charles Lyell ') has made it possible to introduce several letters to Sir Charles. I have also to thank Mr Roderick F. Murchison for the loan of several letters to Sir Roderick I. Murchison ; and Mrs Mason Hoppin of New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A., for so kindly obtaining information about the Great Seal of the United States. To none am I more in- debted than to my three sisters, Isabella, Margaret, and Louisa E. Milne, who have given constant and loving aid in the preparation of the MS. for the printer. G. A. P. DARENT-HULME, No.y 1899. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. 1812-1830. ANCESTRY AND YOUTH. Letter of Queen Elizabeth. Hulme Hall. Sir Thomas Prestwich, Baronet. Medal given by Charles I. to Sir Thomas Prestwich. Sir John Prestwich. Great Seal of the United States. Parentage. Birth. Autobiography. Childhood. School-days in Paris. Sonnet. School-days at Norwood and Reading. Home Life and Character. University College. Oil Painting. Early Geological Studies. Visit to Broseley ........ CHAPTER II. 1830-1834. CITY AND HOME LIFE — ZETETICAL SOCIETY — VISITS TO SHROPSHIRE —NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY. Home Studies. Scheme for Work. Geological Rambles. Autobio- graphy. Coalbrook Dale. City Life. Diary. Chemistry and Physics. Industry and Frugality. Temperament and Character. Geological Society. Business Journeys. Acquisition and Advan- tages of Knowledge . . . . . . .26 X CONTENTS. CHAPTER III. 1834-1849. GEOLOGY OF COALBROOK DALE AND GAMBLE — TERTIARY MEMOIRS. Journey to Scotland. Edinburgh. Banffshire. British Association at Bristol. Visit to Ireland. Business and Science. Recreation. Geological Society of France. Isle of Arran. Note-books. Shake- speare's Cliff. Isle of Wight. Palseontographical Society. Visit to Germany. Boppart. Water- cure. Bagshot Sands. William Lonsdale. Geological Society Club. Wollaston Medal. Studies of the Drift. Denudation of the Weald. Metropolitan Drainage. Geological Excursions . . . . . .45 CHAPTER IV. 1849-1858. EASTER EXCURSIONS— 'THE WATER-BEARING STRATA '—' THE GROUND BENEATH US ' — FURTHER TERTIARY MEMOIRS. Death of his Mother. Letter to his Niece, Sophia Scott. Water- supply. Dr Fitton on Neocomian. Godwin- Austen. Murchison. Business and Geology. Holmfirth Flood. Geological Papers. Geological Society of France. Edward Forbes. Royal Society. De la Beche. Sedgwick. Valley Gravels. High - level Gravel. Secretary and Treasurer of Geological Society. City Life. Death of his Father. Civil Prestwich. Letters to Sir Charles Lyell on Correlation of Tertiary Strata. Meeting with Mr John Evans. Dr J. D. Hooker and Eocene Plants. Leonard Horner . . 75 CHAPTER V. 1858-1859. BRIXHAM CAVE — FLINT IMPLEMENTS — VISITS TO ABBEVILLE — GOWER CAVES. Hugh Falconer. Fossil Mammals. Switzerland. Folkestone. Boucher de Perthes. Caves near Palermo. Antiquity of Man. Amiens. Hoxne. Forged Implements. Fossil Elephants. Cyrena. Sequence of Drifts. Charles Kingsley. Ice-action in Wales. Robert Cham- bers. Menchecourt. Overton Longville . . . .110 CONTENTS. XI CHAPTER VI. 1860-1863. ANTIQUITY OF MAX — FIELD GEOLOGY — GEOLOGICAL .MAPS. Letters to Sir Charles Lyell. Letter to his Sister, C. Thurburn. Somme Valley. Gower Caves. Raised Beach and Boulder Clay of Gower. Boulder Clay of North Wales. Geological Excursions. Rev. John Gunn. Visits to Northamptonshire, Yorkshire, and the Eastern Counties. Preservation of Bones. St Acheul. Reculvers. James Wyatt. Bedford. Grays. Moel Tryfaen and Glacial Sub- mergence. Letter from Mr Ruskin. Memoir on the Drift. Re- port on Wines. Geological Excursions. Geological Survey. Greenough Geological map. Athenaeum Club. Lyell's ' Antiquity of Man' . . . . . . . .145 CHAPTER VII. 1863-1870. HUMAN JAW OF ABBEVILLE — ROYAL COAL COMMISSION — ROYAL WATER COMMISSION — PRESIDENCY OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Moulin Quignon and the Fossil Human Jaw. Owen versus Huxley. Flint Implements. Commission of Inquiry at Paris, Bedford. Abbeville. Geological Excursions. Lecture at the Royal Insti- tution. Social Life. Royal Commission on Water. Death of Falconer. Sangatte. Geological Excursions. Receives a Royal Medal. Purchase of Land near Shoreham. The Grounds of Darent- Hulme. Royal Commission on Coal. Prestwichia. Bovey Tracey. The Foundations of St Paul's Cathedral. Work and Recreation. Memoirs on the Crag. Removal to Darent - Hulme. Geological Excursions. President of the Geological Society . . .178 CHAPTER VIII. 1870-1S74. MARRIAGE — VISIT TO PARIS — ITALY — RETIREMENT FROM THE CITY — AIX-LES-BAINS — PROFESSORSHIP OF GEOLOGY AT OXFORD. Paris. Mentone. Genoa. Italian Caves. Naples. Mrs Somerville. Eastern Counties. Address to Geological Society on Deep-sea Xll CONTENTS. Life. Home life at Darent-Hulme. Professor Morris. Visit to St Andrews. Gardening. Address to Geological Society on Springs and Water-supply, and on Coals and Coal-supply. Geological Ex- cursions. J. F. Campbell. Retirement from Business. Geological Work. Boulogne. Aix-les-Bains. Weymouth, the Isle of Portland, and the Chesil Beach. The Boulonnais. Reviews. Deep-sea Temperatures. The Channel Tunnel. Colonel E. R. Wood. The Settle Cave 216 CHAPTER IX. 1874-1878. OXFORD— FIELD GEOLOGY IN ENGLAND, FRANCE, WALES, AND SCOTLAND. Professor of Geology at Oxford. Excursion of Geologists' Association. Visit to North Devon. Reception at Oxford. Letter from Mr Ruskin. Letter from Mr Robert Mallet. Geological Papers. Visit to Hayling Island and Fareham. Field Classes. Life at Oxford. Darent - Hulme. Malvern Drift. Eastbourne. Death of his Brother. The Boulonnais. The Bible and Geology. Excursion to East Hendred. Letter from Prof. Tyndall. Driving Tour to Warwick and Charnwood Forest. The Baronetcy. Plan for Easter Excursion. Geology and Mathematics. The Earth's Crust. Easter Excursion. Proposed as President of the British Associa- tion. Paris and the Pyrenees. San Sebastian. South Wales. Rhos Sili Bay and Haverfordwest. Journey to Lochaber. Glencoe, Glen Spean, and the Parallel Roads of Glen Roy. Ken-era and Oban. Ayr, Stranraer, and Carlisle. Loughborough. Eastbourne. The Older Rocks under London 249 CHAPTER X. 1878-1888. PRESIDENT OF THE REUNION EXTRAORDINAIRE OF THE FRENCH GEOLOGI- CAL SOCIETY AT BOULOGNE — TEXT -BOOK ON * GEOLOGY '— PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL GEOLOGICAL CONGRESS. Coal-measures in the South of England. Hydro-geological Map of the Thames Basin. National Water-supply. The Parallel Roads of Glen Roy. Letters from J. F. Campbell and C. Darwin. Visit to Tenby and St David's. Narberth. Flint Implements from near CONTENTS. Xlll Ightham. Illness and death of Charles Falconer. Colleges for Women. Iguanodon Prestivichii. Darent-Hulme. Channel Islands. Isle of Wight. British Association, Swansea. Ashmolean Society. George Rolleston. Geological Papers. British Association at York and Southampton. Henry J. S. Smith. William Spottiswoode. Huxley. Jules Marcou. Water - supply of Oxford. J. Gvvyn Jeffreys. The Institute of France. Dr W. B. Carpenter. Origin of Flints. Plateau Implements and River Drift. Regional Meta- morphism. Prof. J. W. Judd. Text-book of Geology. Letter from W. E. Gladstone. Isle of Sheppey. Prof. C. Lapworth. Oxford Memories. Glacial Period. Departure from Oxford. Inter- national Geological Congress. William Colchester. Dean Liddell. Plateau Implements. International Geological Congress. Honor- ary Degree of D.C.L. . . . . . . .296 CHAPTER XL 1888-1895. PLATEAU IMPLEMENTS OF KENT — LETTERS ON POST-GLACIAL SUBMERGENCE — CORRESPONDING MEMBER OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF THE LINCEI —VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF FRANCE. Geologists' Association. Chalk Escarpment. Letter from Sir Andrew Clark. Westleton Beds. Note-books and Maps. Parish Work. The Solent River. Dr H. P. Blackmore. Home Life. Raised Beaches and "Head." Alderbury. Geological Work. J. W. Hulke. The Right Hon. T. H. Huxley. S. R. Pattison. Uni- formitarianism. Studies on Glacial Drifts and Glaciation. The Ightham Fissures. Physics and Geology. The Flood. Plateau Implements. Death of Mrs Russell Scott. Prof. T. Rupert Jones. Letters from Canon Greenwell and W. E. Gladstone. Geological Publications. Letter from the Duke of Argyll. The Rev. R. A. Bullen. Tradition of the Flood. Nature and Art. A Challenge. Friendships abroad. Daubree. Geological Pupils . . . 346 CHAPTER XII. 1895-1896. LAST DAYS. Home Life. Final Writings. Autobiography. Illness. Knighthood. Last Days. Death. Letters of Sympathy . . . .392 XIV CONTENTS. SUMMARY OP THE SCIENTIFIC WORK OF SIR JOSEPH PRESTWICH, D.C.L., F.R.S. BY SIR ARCHIBALD GEIKIE, D.C.L., F.R.S., DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM. Origin of Kiver Valleys. Researches on Deep-sea Life and Tempera- tures. Chesil Bank. Volcanic Geology. Metamorphism. Coal- brookdale. Memoirs on Eocene Strata. Correlation of Formations. Memoirs on the Crag Strata. Antiquity of Man. River-deposits. Later Geological Changes. Raised Beaches. Evidence of a Great Submergence of Western Europe. Practical Applications of Geol- ogy. Text-book. Uniformitarianism. Personality . . 402 LIST OF PAPERS, BOOKS, ETC., BY SIR JOSEPH PRESTWICH, M.A., D.C.L., F.R.S., ETC. ....... 422 LIST OF SOCIETIES TO WHICH SIR JOSEPH PRESTWICH BELONGED . 433 INDEX 434 ILLUSTRATIONS. PAGE SIR JOSEPH PRESTWICH (with signature) . . Frontispiece HULME HALL ........ 2 MEDAL GIVEN BY CHARLES I. TO SIR THOMAS PRESTWICH . . 3 THE GREAT SEAL OP THE UNITED STATES .... 6 PROFESSOR JOHN MORRIS ...... 32 JOSEPH PRESTWICH ... 66 R. A. C. GODWIN-AUSTEN, F.R.S. . . • . .82 FACSIMILE OF PAGE OF NOTE-BOOK: RAISED BEACH AT BRAUNTON, 1855 102 SIR JOHN EVANS, K.C.B. ...... 104 DR HUGH FALCONER, F.R.S. . . . . . .110 M. BOUCHER DE PERTHES ...... 118 A CONFERENCE ON FLINT IMPLEMENTS : PRESTWICH, S. V. WOOD, J. MORRIS, AND F. E. EDWARDS ..... 126 SIR DOUGLAS GALTON, K.C.B. . . . . .162 FACSIMILE OF LETTER WRITTEN BY JOSEPH PRESTWICH . .168 DARENT-HULME ... ... 198 THE DINING-ROOM, DARENT-HULME ..... 200 PRESTWICHIA (LIMULUS) EOTUNDATA, PRESTW. .... 202 SIR WARINGTON W. SMYTH, F.R.S. . . . 210 SIR HENRY D. ACLAND, BART. ... . 250 SECTIONS OF THE DRIFT AT HALVE RN ..... 263 ROBERT ETHERIDGE, F.R.S. - • 308 PLATEAU IMPLEMENTS ....... 356 PROFESSOR T. RUPERT JONES, F.R.S. ..... 376 DIAGRAM SHOWING MODE OF OCCURRENCE OF PLATEAU IMPLEMENTS 386 And Nature, the old nurse, took The child upon her knee, Saying, ' Here is a story-book Thy Father has written for thee.1 ' Come, wander with me,' she said, ' Into regions yet untrod ; And read what is still unread In the manuscripts of God.' " SIE JOSEPH PBESTWICH. CHAPTEE I. ANCESTRY AND YOUTH. THE family of Prestwich of Prestwich 1 and Hulme, from whom the subject of this memoir was descended, were holders of land in the county of Lancaster at a very early date. In the end of the twelfth century they possessed estates in this county, and the name occurs as Prestwych or Prestwich again and again, now in one reign, now in another of the early English kings, chiefly in records touching tenures of land, marriages, &c. In 1301, among the nine witnesses to Thomas de Grelle's charter to the burgesses of Man- chester, are the signatures of Adam de Prestwiche, the fifth witness, and Johe de Prestwyche, the ninth. A curious document among the family papers is the copy of a letter now in the British Museum, and dated 2nd April 1573, from Queen Elizabeth " To our trusty e and well -beloved Edmunde Prestwyche Ar." After recounting the necessity of putting the kingdom in a state of defence, "the Queene" requires from him 1 The village of Prestwich is situated on the Coal Measures, about three and a half miles north-west of Salford. I, In- lo;.n of " ;i, me. ,ii'- p.. i Ion of monyn I - nl ill Homn furlher iv;,Hon;d,le Myde may !.«• . JMV.-II DM hy I In-. whole rnalmn, . . . and Uinrnfon- having niM.de < !ho; • • <• of you II'. i yuill A hihl \ •«• «ood \vill yolle Ix-an- lo n . :md our LV.dim wci: reojiiyn .'.u l.o |»,iy l.o our ii:,e Tin* Minium- of liiriy. |.O,II,(]H;' (fee,, &o, "The "".'I • |.iovi:.ioi, for its early repayment, Illllmn II. ill. Mi' IIOIIK- of III-- r.iinil'v lor «i ihoiiM, \vn.M II, jild MI ' •: i fin- li.i 1 1' I Mil I ii I i < I lion;, c on Mir |)Htllm* IIHK- it WM,H Hiirrouudcd l»y II lllon.t, 11.11(1 it in |H-||I-V«M| |,n li;i,\<- IM-CM 01 '(• 1 1 1 . K •( | I--.. nl>li:.lir< I in I /'!).), ;:.i \ :; <»!' I .Im I S'nMtvv TliiM family, by embarking in the royal cause in the Civil Wan nl Cl.mliM I , !,,.!, miirl. nf ll.cir |.n.],cil,y, ,•>,<> llml, in Mi.- ivij-.n ..I' Kiir; \\ illi.ini, 1 1 u I me I l,i 1 1 .Mi.l r;il,iil.n wrrr Miilil, mill plirdlli nl l»y Sit- Mdwnrd Monnlcy, who loft it, together with his other nil nl ivi, l«> In: iliiii!'lil..-i Aim. \\ilr .. I Sir .lolm r.l.in.l, I'.inoiir! , who 111. nil- ii In-i i liit-i ic • i.lcin •!-. A! I In- (Iciil.h nf Ilirir MOM, Sii .i.-lni I'.l ui.l. I'.. m. in i il u.i. ..I. I i.. (i. I l..\.l. I' .| .;i •! it, now I" I IM I Mil.i- «.|' I'.i nl"c\\;ili-r. Il VYollld .i])|M-.ir lli.il llic l.i;;l n,inic<| (>\\iicr l)l'ol<(i III) thn vtMUU'iihlti JM|(^ ol' huildin^H into Iliirlv or forty OOttn^'O-UuUUH^nt/H, <»l \\lildi l»ul III Mr if ;in\ \c;,h"r iio\\ rrin.'illiM. Thr c:ir\cil «>,ik jcuicl,1;, \\hicli drcor.M t rd Ihn hrHt room:;, wnrr | >n rcl 1:1; ;<•« I l»\ I lie M;irl of Mlh^S- Ilinrn Mild rrinoxrd lo \\oi;;|< \ I hill. Tho MC-tllld Slt(^ of I Illlinn I 1,'dl \\ ,i:; ;il»onl .1 . ju.i i I <y olhiM'M, Mild Mllhoiij^h ,so le\\ Miirvivo (<> hriir tlu^ SIR THOMAS PRESTWTCH. 3 name, yet it will never pass into oblivion. For several centuries it had been handed down in the Prestwich gallery in the Cathedral or Collegiate Church in Man- chester, where many of the race found their last rest- ing-place. The gallery itself no longer exists. It is, moreover, remembered in Manchester that the gift of its first free library was made by the Rev. John Prestwich, Fellow of All Souls', and brother of Sir Thomas of the Civil Wars. A baronetcy was conferred on Sir Thomas Prestwich, on the 25th April 1644, by Charles L, on the field of battle outside Oxford, as an acknowledgment of his services to the royal cause, and in especial for having raised a troop of horse at his own cost. Several small gold medals or badges were then Struck off bearing the effigy of the ill-fated king. One of these badges, given to the new-made Baronet at Oxford, is in the keeping of the writer. Medal given by Charles I. to Sir Thomas Prestimch. (Twice the actual size.) As may be understood, the Prestwiches were greatly im- poverished by the sacrifices they had made on behalf of the 4 SIR JOHN PRESTWICH. Crown. At the head of the [Eoyalist] party in Manchester we find the names of Holland, Egerton, Prestwich, Stanley, &c. Sequestration and confiscation were put in force against the con- quered in a manner most revolting. It was after this that in 1660 the sale of Hulme Hall took place, and this sale was con- firmed by Act of Parliament in 1673. Towards the close of the Civil War, Sir Thomas refused to give further assistance to the royal cause, but that his mother prevailed upon him to continue his allegiance, telling him that she had hidden treasures where- with to supply his needs ; but unfortunately the old lady was seized with apoplexy, and died before she could reveal her secret. It was supposed that this treasure was buried in the neigh- bourhood of Hulme Hall, and for a long time afterwards gipsies wandering about the country made considerable profit out of this by selling the secret, which they pretended to know. The baronetcy had been for many years in abeyance, when it was assumed by John Prestwich (a cousin of our geologist's father) ; but his claim to the title was not legally acknowledged : he was not descended from the first baronet, but from his cousin, and from a younger son of that cousin. The father and grand- father of the geologist repeatedly stated that they were in possession of papers showing their descent. One day, however, the father went to an election with the said papers in his pocket ; on returning home the pocket was empty, and the papers have never since been heard of. Sir John, who left no family, was greatly interested in the Prestwich genealogy, and many volumes in MS., containing extracts from documents in the British Museum, heralds' visitations, deeds, &c., which related to the subject, were written by him with extreme care. He was a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries, and a manuscript by him on Earthquakes was published in GREAT SEAL OF UNITED STATES. 5 1870 by our Joseph Prestwich in the * Geological Maga- zine ' for that year. In 1775 his book on 'Mineral, Animal, and Vegetable Poisons ' appeared ; but he is best known by a work published in 1787, entitled ' Respublica, or a Display of the Honours, Ceremonies, and Enseignes of the Commonwealth under the Pro- tectorship of Oliver Cromwell,' &c. It is interesting to note that it is to this Sir John Prestwich that the United States are indebted for the design of their Great Seal. Three committees had been appointed, one after another, to prepare a seal, but as none of their designs gave satisfaction to Congress, on June 13th of the same year (1782) the whole matter was finally referred by that body to Charles Thomson, its secretary. He procured several devices, among them an elaborate one by William Barton of Philadelphia ; but none of them met with approval until John Adams, then in London, sent him a design suggested by Sir John Prestwich, an Englishman who was a warm friend of America and an accomplished antiquarian. It was described in 1782 as follows :— Arms. — Paleways of thirteen pieces, argent and gules ; a chief azure ; the escutcheon on the breast of the American eagle dis- played proper, holding in his dexter talon an olive branch, and in his sinister a bundle of thirteen arrows, all proper, and in his beak a scroll inscribed with this motto : E Pluribus Unum. For the Crest. — Over the head of the eagle, which appears above the escutcheon, a glory or breaking through a cloud proper, and surrounding thirteen stars, forming a constellation, argent on an azure field. Reverse. — A pyramid unfinished. In the zenith an eye in a triangle, surrounded with a glory proper. Over the eye these words, Annuit Cceptis (God has favoured the undertaking). On the base of the pyramid the numerals MDCCLXXVI., and 6 PARENTAGE. underneath the following motto : Novus Or do Soeculorum ("A New Series of Ages "), denoting that a new order of things had commenced in the Western World — or freely translated, "A new era/' The Great Seal of the United States. This design of Sir John Prestwich's, which was adopted as being the simplest and most significant of any submitted, still remains the arms of the United States. " It was strange " (as the writer of the paragraph in an American paper observed) " that after six years spent in deliberation, Congress should have finally adopted a design by one of a nation with whom America was then at war." But all our interest centres in the Prestwich whose life we shall now attempt to trace. His father, Joseph, after whom he was named, was one of a firm of wine merchants in Mark Lane, who imported, and supplied the trade in the provinces as well as in Scotland and Ireland. Joseph Prestwich, senior, was the only son of Elias Prestwich of Broseley in Shropshire (whose grandparents had migrated there from Ireland, one of the family having taken refuge and settled there during the Civil Wars) ; and his wife was Catherine, PARENTAGE. 7 the only surviving daughter of Edward Blakeway, the squire of Broseley. It was in Clapham, and amid its then rural surroundings, that the father and mother of our Joseph Prestwich began their married life. Early in the century Clapham and its neighbourhood were very different suburbs of London from what they are to-day. The fields and green lanes of those years have vanished, and their place has been invaded by ever-extending blocks of brick and mortar. At that time comfortable houses stood in their own grounds or gardens, the gardens generally merging into pro- ductive orchards. Now coal-trucks and sheds cover sites which were noted for their heavy crops of fruit. Then railways were unknown, nor had tram-cars, which run in rapid succession in the now noisy thoroughfares, ever been heard of. In short, the aspect of the place is altogether changed. Of the parents of Joseph Prestwich it may be re- marked that his father was a man of ability, widely read, with a knowledge of art, who enjoyed nothing more than his tours and journeys in France and Hol- land, when he was occasionally accompanied by his wife. Foreign travel was then for the few, and was not made easy for the many. He was of a sanguine temperament, racy and witty — " very good company," as a relative explained, when describing his ever-ready repartee. The mother of our geologist, to whom throughout life he was tenderly attached, was the eldest of seven. Three of the little Blakeways died in childhood, and the survivors were Catherine, Edward, John, and James. Catherine (Mrs) Prestwich was greatly be- loved by her family and friends : she was entirely domestic, sweet -natured, and refined — a good wife and 8 PARENTAGE. an affectionate mother. She made a happy home, and her distinguished son in after-years often acknowledged that he could not have accomplished the work that he did but for the advantages of this quiet and cheer- ful abode. Mrs Prestwich was cast in a different mould from her mother, whose maiden name was Prytherch. Mr Blakeway of Broseley had been some time a widower when he confided to his friend the Rev. Stephen Prytherch, the vicar of Leigh ton (who had a bevy of very handsome daughters), that his home was lonely and that he wished to marry again : would he give him one of his daughters? The vicar was de- lighted, but the question was, Which ? His advice, " Better take the eldest," was followed. It was a wooing not long a - doing, and Catherine Prytherch soon became Mrs Blakeway of Broseley Hall. Al- though there was great disparity in age, the squire being thirty years the lady's senior, she made an excellent wife, and they became an attached couple. But she was a strange mother : she made a point of sending all her children out to nurse soon after their birth, so as to have no further trouble with them. They were placed with a much - respected Quaker family, and their father, who was fond of his children, rode daily over to see them. Mrs Prestwich used to say that the amusement which she and her little brothers liked best was sitting on the banks of the river and listening to the sound of the water. Their mother took no more concern about them until they were sent home old enough to be packed off to school. Thus mother and daughter were very unlike : Mrs Blakeway with her marked individuality and strong will, - - her daughter, Mrs 1812.] BIRTH. 9 Prestwich, all unselfishness and gentleness, and full of though tfulness for others. The Blakeways had been connected with the Church for many generations, and a kinsman, the Rev. John Brickenden Blakeway, rector of St Mary's, Shrewsbury, was joint author with Arch- deacon Owen of a ' History of Shropshire.' Mr and Mrs Prestwich had ten children, three of whom died in infancy. The eldest surviving was our geologist, who was born at Pensbury, Clapham, on the 12th March 1812, and whose death took place at Darent-Hulme, Shoreham in Kent, on the 23rd June 1896. He was the second of the name, the first-born Joseph having lived only a few months. Thus the two sons and five daughters were Joseph, Isabella Civil, Catherine, Eliza, Emily, Edward Elias, and Civil Mary. The two survivors are Eliza (Mrs Tomkins) and Emily Prestwich. Among the family papers there are forty-two little volumes of pocket-books containing brief diaries which were kept by our Joseph Prestwich's mother, and which date from the year of her marriage, 1809, to 1850, the year of her death. The entries are short, being only a few sentences recording the events of each day. But the volume for 1812 has a pathetic interest: when a second little Joseph had arrived to replace the first- born, the daily entries betray the constant motherly anxiety, and every symptom of the health of the infant is recorded. We give no extract : the reading was intended for a mother's eyes. In the diaries of the next few years there is only occasional allusion to little Joseph, since other children had been born to share in and claim the maternal care. It is evident, however, that the boy was, like most healthy little boys, restlessly active, with a tendency to lead his 10 AUTOBIOGRAPHY. [l817. small sisters into trouble. At the tender age of five the child was placed as a boarder at a school about a mile distant. This early launching into life will be told in his own words, in a few pages of an autobiography which nearly eighty years later Joseph Prestwich had been urged to write, and which had only just been begun in those last months when he was attacked by fatal illness : — I must have been a mischievous boy. At five years of age I was sent to school. The last misdemeanour which led to it was this. Our house at Lavender Hill stood in a large garden and orchard in which was a fish-pond. One fine summer's day the nurse was, I am told, sent to fetch us children and put us to bed. Preferring an outdoor life, I persuaded my little sister, who was eighteen months younger than myself, to hide in the pond, where I felt sure they would never seek us. Accordingly we marched in until the water was up to our necks, and there we might have remained, heedless of the cries of the nurse, until what I judged would be a fitter time for bed, had not my sister betrayed us by an uncontrollable fit of laughter. The school to which I was sent at Wandsworth was about a mile distant from our home, and was kept by a Madame Saqui, I presume a French emigrant. She suffered from dropsy, and adopted a mode of exercise which I have never since seen. At the end of the schoolroom was a tall seat formed by thick cushions with springs, and having arms to hold on by on either side. On this she bobbed up and down, while she could see all that was going on in the schoolroom. It was very comical, but to laugh we dared not. I do not remember what I learned — I imagine it was but little. I remember better our amuse- ments. At that time (1817) fairs were held in all towns and villages around London, which had its own great central fair in Smithfield. To the Wandsworth fair we never failed to be led, and were then each presented with a bun. We had also our daily walks. On one of those we passed by the lodge of our house, and the gate being open, and having an innate dislike to school, I ran off down the avenue until stopped by Ml. 5.] CHILDHOOD. 11 the barking of a little dog which fronted me : whence possibly my subsequent want of affection for the species. This school being found too near home, I was sent to one on Forest Hill. Again the fairs on Peckham Eye and Camberwell Green are the objects which cling most to my recollection. We were, I think, treated kindly, though our fare was at times somewhat hard. On Saturdays, the servants being much occu- pied, the ordinary dinner was replaced by a more simple meal of bread and cheese, the bread being not unfrequently speckled green. Our playground was a field on the top of a hill of bare London clay. I then had a small garden in which I dug what I was pleased to consider a well, London clay being water- tight. I had the satisfaction of frequently having it full of water. How little I thought then how much I should sub- sequently be connected with the structure and geological history of that formation. When the field was too wet we were allotted 200 to 300 yards of the public road which ran in front of the house for our playground, and occasionally levied small black- mail on the few passers-by. In the meantime our family had removed from Lavender Hill to " The Eetreat," South Lambeth. It was a three- storey ed house surrounded by a parapet wall. A favourite amusement was to walk all round the wall followed by the most fearless of my sisters, but the amusement not being considered safe, it was stopped. I was now sent to a day-school adjoining, where I fear my book studies progressed no more rapidly than before. Nature had more attractions for me. With my sisters we used to walk along the Wandsworth Koad as far as Lavender Hill, and I well remember the interest with which I noticed two springs which then existed on that road. One was on Eush Hill, where it broke out from beneath a bed of gravel lying on the London clay. The other was at a lower level, and at the base of the gravel covering Battersea Fields. How well I remember wondering where the water came from : it was a mystery. These springs have long since disappeared from sight, for the road is no longer the quiet country road it was then, with only an occasional vehicle passing, but had been, when I last saw it, transformed into the resemblance of the Whitechapel Eoad, paved and street-like. 12 AUTOBIOGRAPHY. [l823. Our clergyman was a man of the world and of society. At his house I saw among many public characters Rammohun Roy, whose conversion to Unitarianism made at that time a great stir in London. He was a tall, striking-looking, grave man of about forty. Barnes, the editor of the 'Times,' was also a frequent visitor there. It was now decided that I should be sent to school in Paris. Accordingly, early one fine summer morning, escorted by both parents and with my eldest sister, we started in the basket of the Union coach for Dover. 'Arriving in the evening, we had to wait till next day for crossing. Starting at ten, Calais was reached at about twelve. The rest of the day was spent in passing our luggage through the custom-house, getting our pass- ports vise*d, and securing places in the diligence. Before leav- ing Calais, I took the opportunity of going down one of the shallow wells which were then to be found in most of the court- yards of the town, and came up, I imagine, not much the wiser. Diligences started for Paris morning and evening. We left on a morning by the Messageries Royales, and after spending two nights and part of two days on the road, arrived in the great yard in the Rue Notre Dame des Victoires. I was now eleven years old, and the interest I felt in all I saw was excessive. I was never tired of seeing the streets — which then, with the exception of the Rue de la Paix, had no footpaths — and of watch- ing the traffic and listening to the many cries. The school selected for me was at the top of the Rue des Martyrs, at the foot of Montmartre. It was a large school, kept by a M. Colin. I was placed more particularly in charge of Mme. Colin and their only daughter, Mdlle. Fannie, who was two to three years older than myself. M. Colin was a man about forty, with only one leg— a sight at that time very common in Paris, when men with one leg or arm were constantly met with. I was the only English boy in the school, and nothing could be kinder than their treatment of me. I was a little bullied by the boys, for Waterloo was then of fresh memory, but I always found a few to take my part : there was the cachot if they were caught in the act [of bullying me], so I got on very well. The place was barrack-like and the fare simple. The floors were all tiled and the dormitories without furniture. . . The breakfast was JET. 11.] SCHOOL DAYS IN PARIS. 13 very simple: the boys marched into the rtfectoire, where long loaves were run under a sort of chaff-cutting machine, and as the great hunks fell on one side they were snatched up by the boys — played at ball with, and then eaten and washed down with a little water. Dinner consisted *of bouillon and boidlli followed by a dish of vegetables, the beverage being what the boys called attendance — that is to say, one bottle of vin ordinaire to one bucket of water. But all seemed contented, whilst I, as a stranger, was allowed a few indulgences. The school, however, soon broke up, and M. Colin removed to a small house, with a few boys, lower down the street. Education in Paris was at that time (1823) very cheap. As extras I was taught, besides Italian, drawing, dancing, and fenc- ing, at one franc per lesson. Our school was attached to the College Bourbon (changed to the Lyc($e Condorcet), but I was considered too young to profit by the connection. Amongst the students attending the College was the Due d'Orleans, son of Louis Philippe, who a few years later was killed by a fall from his carriage. We had two half-holidays a week, when we were taken generally either to play in amongst the chestnut-trees of the Tuileries gardens, or to the top of Montmartre with its swings and quarries. The fossils were then unknown to me, but I took great interest in the fine crystals of gypsum, which we could cleave into plates as thin as a wafer and as clear as glass. In summer we were frequently taken to one of the large baths on the Seine, and there, wrapped in a peignoir, would spend long hours. On Sundays I was taken to the French Protestant church, or else went to spend the day with my sister in the Rue de Valois. Occasionally Mdlle. Fannie would take me with her in early morning to the great central markets. Nothing, in fact, could have been kinder and more considerate than the treatment I received, and I shall ever hold the memory of M. Colin and his family in affectionate remembrance. Mme. Colin treated me as a son. In fact, Mdlle. Fannie used to exclaim, " Oh ! qu'il est gate ce petit Joseph ! " But with all this my studies were not neglected, and I learned easily and quickly. He was petted and caressed, but was not spoilt, and the happiness of school - life in Paris was never 14 SCHOOL DAYS IN PARIS. [1824. forgotten. Perhaps in later years the very remem- brance of it unconsciously acted as a magnet, and drew him . to France and to his many friends there. A few months after his arrival the boy had an illness, and such was M. and Mme. Colin's kindness that they had him then to sleep in their own room. The reason that Madame Colin alleged for her devotion to the little English boy was always, " II est si raisonnable, le petit Joseph ! " It is not surprising that Made- moiselle Fannie became jealous. This jealousy, how- ever, on the part of the young daughter was short- lived, and when in later years she became Madame Nyon, her eldest child was named after the sister of " le petit Joseph." The letters which he sent to his father at this time — always in French — are very amusing. The following is a specimen : — PAKIS, Mars 9, 1824. Mox CHER PAPA, — Je ne vous ai pas ecrit plutot parceque je voulais attendre j usqu'a la fin du carnaval pour vous dire tout ce que j'ai vu. Le premier dimanche appele le dimanche gras, j'ai etc* voir le bceuf gras qui est le plus beau qui se trouve dans tout Paris, il est suivi d'un char dans lequel il y a un joli petit enfant habille comme un amour, le char est conduit par un homme qui represente le temps, tous ceux qui 1'entourent et tous les musici- ens qui I'accompagnent sont deguises en soldats romains. Apres avoir vu cette mascarade qui attire tou jours la foule, j'ai e'te me promener sur les boulevards pour voir les masques, mais comme il faisait un tres mauvais temps je n'en ai pas vu beaucoup. Lundi je suis alle* au spectacle ou j'ai vu Pierre de Portugal, tragedie de Mr Arnauld, et les rendez-vous bourgeois travestis, cette derniere piece est une farce de carnaval dans laquelle tous les hommes sont deguises en femmes et toutes les femmes de*- guisees en hommes. Mardi j'ai vu dans les voitures beaucoup de masques tres droles qui allaient a un bal masque. Le soir chaque eleve a mis quinze sous nous avons achete du cidre, une tarte ala JET. 12.] SCHOOL DAYS IN PARIS. 15 frangipane et d'autres choses. Madame Colin nous a donne une creme, des crepes, des cerises, du vin, et du jus de la fleur d'orange et avec cela, nous avons fait une jolie collation apres laquelle nous avons e"te" nous coucher. Je n'ai recu votre lettre que six semaines apres qu'elle avait ete ecrite car vous 1'avez ecrite le 19 Janvier, et je ne 1'ai recu que le 7 Mars. J'ai appris de Madame Thiebaut que j'avais une nouvelle petite soeur cela m'a cause beaucoup de joie. Je donnerai mes dessins a Madame Billin qui les enverra en Angleterre par 1'Ambassadeur. J'ai presque fini celui qui est destin^ a Monsieur Colin. Je n'ai pas encore commence le paysage mais je m'[en] occuperai bientot si vous le desirez. J'ai un nouveau maitre de danse qui est bien meilleur que le dernier, car il me fait faire beaucoup d'exercices. J'ai e*te voir le spectacle franconi avec ma soeur, Madame Thie- baut et Mademoiselle Victoire. On donnait la prise de trocadero et le petit tambour. Je vous remercie bien des dix francs que vous m'avez envoye's mais je les devais pour le panier que j'ai donne a ma sosur et je les ai paye"s tout de suite. Isabelle et moi nous nous portons tres bien. J'espere que vous, Maman, mes sceurs et mon frere et ma [bonne] se portent bien. Adieu, mon cher Papa. — Je suis votre fils soumis, J. PKESTWICH. After this date his father stipulated that all his letters were to be sent as they were written — un- corrected. The boy delighted in Paris, and entered with keen enjoyment into the life and amusements of the school. He made great progress in drawing, for which he had unusual talent, and the crayon heads, &c., which he sent home from time to time, were remarkable as the work of a schoolboy. This faculty for drawing proved of great service to him in after-life when sketching sections in the field. In reading these few pages of autobiography we have to bear in mind that this MS., alas ! was never re-read, never corrected by its writer. 16 AUTOBIOGRAPHY. [l825. And now began iny education in earnest. I soon mastered French, and carried away various prizes — amongst others that for Cacographie, which consisted in rendering into correct French a paper of text badly spelt. My translations of Latin into French were approved, and my reading of Dante and Ariosto gave satisfaction to my Italian master, who recorded his approval in the following lines 1 : — " Al Gentilissimo Signer GIUSEPPE PRESTWICH in attestato di verace affetto il servo suo divoto FREDERICK) BROGLIO. SONNET (of which a free translation is here given)? "PARIS, 8th July 1825. " When now, as wont, you turn and leave behind Fair France, at this last moment, in words brief, Full of esteem and love for you, I find Expression for my thoughts and for my grief. Benign One ! hearken to my loving lay. May not these accents to the winds be sent, But in my heart for ever may you stay, There find a home and soften my lament. On your return midst household gods again, With troops of chosen friends around you, then, Upon that man unknown to fame, ah ! deign Upon him, far removed by seas, as when He taught you Tuscan tones in bygone days, To think, for he will ever love and praise ! " Amongst the public events which I witnessed during my residence in Paris were the return of the French army from Spain and the arrival of the Duke of Northumberland as ambassador to "Louis Dix-huit." The procession of carriages and military in the latter case was very gorgeous, and the most extravagant reports were circulated of the great wealth of the Duke. I was in the crowd in the Rue du Faubourg Saint Denis, and the people around me were speculating, not upon his yearly income, but upon how much he was in receipt of 1 These were evidently farewell verses addressed to him when leaving school in Paris. 2 By the writer's youngest sister. JET. 13.] SCHOOL-DAYS AT NORWOOD. 17 per day, per hour, and per minute. At the other striking scene I climbed on the pedestal of the great statue at the entrance to the Tuileries, where I could command a view from the Arc de 1'fitoile down the Champs Elysees, the whole length of which was filled by squadrons of foot and cavalry marching in from ISTeuilly. I think it took them about two hours to defile by. They were a fine body of men, much stained and weatherbeaten. The exhibition of fireworks at night was on a large scale, and very effective. At the end of two years, during which I had once visited England, I returned home. My French costume created some amusement. I wore a long blue swallow-tailed coat with brass buttons and a tall hat. I found that in the meantime the family had removed from "The Eetreat" to "The Lawn" — the house No. 8, afterwards occupied by Mr Fawcett. I was now sent to a school at Norwood. ... I here received my first introduction to science — one master giving us occasional lectures on chemistry, which fascinated me ; but my home-work was confined for a time to chemical experiments. I was also instructed in history, geography, arithmetic, and book-keeping. On holidays we played hockey with the masters, as I had done in Paris. In the autumn we were allowed a day's run in the wood, which then extended from Norwood to Penge, to gather blackberries, which afterwards appeared on the table for three days in the shape of blackberry puddings. I then made my first and last appearance on the stage in the " Bourgeois Gentilhomme " of Moliere ; but though I was a good French scholar, my performance was not such as to encourage for me a repetition of it at this annual festival. At that time Guy Fawkes' Day was religiously kept by all boys. We were allowed to gather sticks in the woods, and these, with the aid of a tar -barrel, made a large bonfire, on which a guy was burnt to the accompaniment of many squibs and crackers. I was now sent to Dr Valpy's school at Eeading, who con- sidered that my education had been greatly neglected, as I knew nothing of Greek. Here I went through the usual course of classics, with a little geography in the shape of a paid extra. I managed to escape flogging for the two years I was B 18 SCHOOL-DAYS AT BEADING. [1827. there, though I was occasionally called upon to hoist better scholars than myself. The doctor was noted for his flogging propensities; but having the authority of my father to run away in case I had to change places in this performance, the thought of it gave me but little anxiety, otherwise the discipline was not strict. In fact, it was too much the contrary — at least on the side where I was boarded. Dr Valpy was a noted classical scholar, and doubt- less found that the boy's education had been sadly desultory. We do not hear of Joseph having taken a good place in the school ; his dancing, drawing, and fencing, his Italian and French, could not have helped him much. He was said to be " a quiet, shy boy, but full of energy, and always the leader of his companions." His letters from Reading find him in- variably in the same financial position as he found himself when in Paris : when pocket-money was sent it was spent directly in presents for those at home, and always included a gift for his old nurse, thus leaving him penniless. The thorough way in which in one Reading letter the schoolboy makes a financial state- ment to his father, when he had not the means to pay his debts, and the method by which he shows every side of the case quite dispassionately, either for or against himself, were characteristic of him through- out life. He entered with zest into all the fun among the boys, who used to buy of the day-boarders black- birds and thrushes, which they roasted and ate with relish. They also made custards in private, and ex- cellently well they made them. The urgency of the postscript in this Reading letter will provoke a smile : — READING, May 1827. DEAR FATHER, — I received your letter about three weeks ago, which I intended to have answered the next day had not a cricket-ball knocked off the top of my little finger, which has JET. 15.] SCHOOL-DAYS AT BEADING. 19 hindered me from writing till the present moment : it is not well yet, and I have only just begun to write. I am very much obliged to you for the pound you ordered Mr Knight to give me, but which I am ashamed yet forced to own I have spent ; for there are an old man and woman that live on the Forbery who sell to us all sorts of things that we want. When you sent me the money I owed them about 15s. I went to pay her directly I got the money, but she said that I must wait till she made my bill. The next day being the fair day, I spent a great part of it in books, but I did not buy any trash, nor go into any shows ; with the rest I paid my debts to the boys, and before she had finished my bill (which was a day or two ago) all my money was gone. But why I wish you to send me some now is because yesterday one of the Doctor's sons, a clergyman, went into the shop, and seeing a great many bills lying upon the table, took them up, and perceiving that the boys owed her a great deal, some of them £2 or £3, and others only 6d. or 9d., went to the Doctor and told him of it, who said that he would put all the boys on the obstinate list (when any one is on it, he has to do a long imposition every day, has to say almost all the lesson when his class goes up, generally gets caned if he says a word wrong, and seldom escapes a flogging during the week) till it is paid off, which he does by giving the woman sixpence a-day for those that owe her anything until they are out of her debt, so I should be on the list for a month. So, dear father, it would be the same to you whether you send it me now or had it put down on your bill. Please, if you send the money at all, send it before the end of this week. I was rather surprised when you said I was not to have any parcels ; but since it is your desire that I should not have any I will submit to it, though I should prefer having them continued, for though it is a great school, most of the boys don't despise having wine, cakes, fruits, &c., sent them. I have not bathed yet, for I do not think it warm enough. Please to excuse the writing on account of my finger, which I find very awkward still. I hope you, dear mother, sisters, and brother are quite well ; and with my love to you and them, I remain, dear father, your dutiful son, J. PRESTWICH. N.B. — Please to answer this letter directly, if it is convenient to you. Mr and Mrs Hornbuckle desire their compliments to you. 20 AUTOBIOGRAPHY. [l828. The autobiography continues : — On the occasion of the battle of Navarino, where the combined fleets of England, France, and Eussia managed to destroy the Turkish fleet, greatly to the advantage of the latter Power and little to the profit of the first two, the boys were given a half holiday, and naturally looked upon the battle as a glorious vic- tory. A great event was a general election, for as elections then lasted three weeks, the boys shared in the excitement by siding with the blues or the yellows, finding it a pleasant break in the monotony of school-life. Boating and bathing we had in plenty in the Thames at Caversham and Pangbourne. Among my con- temporaries there was Jackson, afterwards Bishop of London, a studious tall lad, who joined but little in the school games. Reading was then a quiet country town without railways, and with little trade except its breweries ; [Huntley and] Palmer and Sutton were still below the horizon. Leaving school, I was entered at sixteen years of age at Uni- versity College, London, then recently opened. Having partly my own choice of subjects, I selected Chemistry under Dr Turner, a popular and excellent teacher ; English under Mr Dale ; Latin, Prof. Key; Greek, Prof. Long; Natural Philosophy under Dr Lardner ; and Mathematics, Augustus de Morgan. As I had to walk four miles daily to and from South Lambeth, I found my curriculum rather too extended; and as I had little liking for the classics, I fear I neglected them in favour of chemistry and natural philosophy. Unfortunately I missed the first few mathematical [lectures], and then feeling discouraged in being unable to follow, I ceased to attend, much to my subsequent regret. All my spare time, spare pocket-money, and spare thoughts were spent on chemistry. I also entered the practical class, then under the direction of Robert Warington, a most kind and painstaking teacher. In this subject I passed a good examination and obtained a certifi- cate [with honours, Ed.~\ At " The Lawn," at the foot of a few steps leading down from the breakfast-room, there was a small dark room, which was our student's laboratory, and known JST. 16.] HOME LIFE AND CHARACTER. 21 as his "Den." When at home he was usually to be found in it at work amongst his minerals, acids, &c. Here he manufactured the laughing-gas which he administered to his companions (and he had always a following), with occasionally alarming effects ; here he blew glass and set himself to make philosophical instruments. The five young sisters hung upon his words, and looked up with admiration at their clever elder brother, sharing in the delight and often in the danger of some of the experiments. Frequently in later years he urged that every boy and girl should be taught at least the elements of chemistry. In appearance the thin tall stripling, now 5 feet 10 inches in height, resembled his mother's family. He had strongly marked features, a clear fresh com- plexion, a thick crop of hair which was nearly black, and an unusually fine forehead. But his eyes were the great feature of his face, — luminous hazel eyes which mirrored every emotion, now liquid, yet always with a light in them, or when indignant or angry (and he could be both) flashing fire. Naturally he was quick in temper, and on one occasion when his anger lasted, and when reminded that this was possibly the temper of his ancestor, the old knight-banneret, crop- ping out, he burst into laughter, and the anger, like a lightning - flash, went as it came. Nothing stirred his indignation so much as when he met what was false, or a sham, or underhand, and then he spoke out his mind. He could not conscientiously join in repeating the Athanasian Creed, so he made no feint of an open prayer-book, but deliberately shut it, whereas when the " Benedicite omnia opera" was sung, no one in the congregation joined with greater fervour. He delighted in that song of praise. 22 UNIVERSITY COLLEGE. [1828-30. At this period of his short college course he was in the habit of versifying, writing rhymes to his com- panions, or penning sonnets to his pretty partners at dances, — and he had always many pretty partners, being quite what is termed " a lady's man." Later on we hear of his escorting his sisters and elder cousins, and also daughters of friends, to school in France, a responsibility which rested very agreeably on his shoulders. His poetry consisted chiefly of Odes in blank verse on Nature's varying and changing moods, of which he was the watchful observer. Al- though never a talkative lad, he was eminently soci- able, his father and mother were both hospitable, and in all the exuberance of his young life he enjoyed to a degree the evening parties and gatherings of relatives and friends. Yet underlying all his delightful buoyancy of spirits there was that intense earnestness — that determination to interpret for himself the records of the rocks. He was preparing for that work, the obstacles to which at one period seemed overwhelming, but to which he was steadfast throughout life, and which held his heart to the very end. It is evident that while at University College every subject was neglected for the sake of chemistry and natural philosophy. It is evident, too, that he took the direction of his studies into his own hands : Latin and Greek were set aside ; mathematics also were neglected, though most unwillingly. On leaving col- lege he worked at mathematics with a private tutor, but never ceased to regret that he had not attended the college course. In the intervals between lectures he frequented the British Museum : he also found time ,ET. 16-18.] OIL-PAINTING. 23 for lessons in oil-painting and lithography from Mr Waterhouse Hawkins. Subsequently the sale of his paintings enabled him to purchase materials and ap- paratus for experiments. The economies which he practised during those college days, in order to provide himself with money for the purchase of chemical materials, were carried to excess, and involved no little self-denial. An ample allowance was given to him for dinner in town, but, conscious of his parents' liberality, he never confessed to the family that most frequently dinner consisted of a bun or a roll, or occasionally a sausage - roll. " The Lawn" at South Lambeth was four miles distant from University College, so that daily he had an eight miles' walk, which was lengthened by his making a long round by Doulton's factories, to save the toll on Vauxhall Bridge, which was the direct road. One ingenious device to put him in funds was the sale to his mother of arrowroot made from potatoes at so much per lb., she having presented him with the potatoes I Then there was a great demand for arrow- root in the household, the young sisters petitioning for its daily consumption. In jottings for 1831 there is an entry of three oil- paintings being given in part payment for a mountain barometer and sextant. The only specimen of his painting which escaped conversion into money is the copy of a small picture by Wouvermann. The system of working hard day after day on stinted food must have had a bad effect on his health, and it is a question whether it did not tell injuriously on him in after-life. Supper over, whether tired or not, he repeated some experiments to the small 24 EARLY GEOLOGICAL STUDIES. [1828-30. appreciative family audience, which was often in- creased by one or two old school -fellows, who were always welcome. At that time geology was not taught anywhere in London. The only nominal instruction then in geology and mineralogy was to be had in three lectures by Dr Turner at the end of his course of forty lectures on chemistry. Parkinson's ' Organic Eemains ' in three quarto volumes and his small octavo in one volume constituted the student's stock-in-trade.1 I had a Conularia from Coalbrook Dale. It puzzled me, as it did the Professors of my acquaintance.2 Chemical analysis led me to the study of rocks and minerals, so it was on that side that I approached geology. The variety of paving-stones which I passed in my daily walks to college caught my attention, and led me to inquire what they were made of and how made. I used also to go to the British Museum in Great Eussell Street to in- spect the organic remains, and pondered especially over the well-preserved and attractive series of the Calcaire Grassier.3 The following years my holidays were spent at Broseley in Shropshire, a market-town celebrated for its tobacco-pipes and iron- and coal-works. The latter soon attracted my attention, and I spent hours at the heaps of ironstone, the seam worked being the Pennystone, so rich in marine remains. My chief work there was, however, on a subsequent and longer visit. It is pleasant to find that on one of these journeys to Broseley he was most kindly and hospitably received by his grandmother, who, as he reports in a letter to " The Lawn," " entertained me sumptuously." An anecdote is told of her, that when on a visit to Mrs Prestwich, 1 Sowerby's ( Mineral Conchology/ then in course of publication, was beyond the student's reach. 2 The true relationship of Conularia has not yet been established, although it is regarded as a Pteropod, belonging to an order of pelagic Mollusca. 3 A richly fossiliferous series of limestones, &c., equivalent to our Bracklesham Beds. JET. 16-18.] VISIT TO BROSELEY. 25 her only daughter, to whom she was greatly attached, the young Prestwiches were all away from home. Kate, the second grandchild, happened to arrive one day at " The Lawn " before the departure of her grand- mother, whose exclamation, " Snow in harvest," testified to anything but pleasure when she was told of the home- coming of the young girl. Doubtless Mrs Blakeway felt disappointed at the interruption to the quiet of her visit, and at the distraction that a child in the house must cause to the mother. On her visits to " The Lawn," Mrs Blakeway's custom had been to give a present in money to each of her Prestwich grand- children ; but to Joseph, the eldest, when a boy, she only gave half of what she bestowed 011 his sisters, saying she knew " that his money would be all spent directly " ! Yet although she would have nothing to say to chil- dren, this very original old lady had keen pleasure in the society of her grandson when he was no longer a child. His name must have been made widely known throughout the Broseley district by the miners. His youth, his enthusiasm in descending and working among their coal-pits, and his characteristic courtesy to all with whom he came in contact, must have won their hearts. His grandmother often declared that she intended to live as long as her husband, who died in his ninety-third year, and she actually attained that age. 26 CHAPTEE II. 1830-1834. CITY AND HOME LIFE — ZETETICAL SOCIETY — VISITS TO SHROPSHIRE — NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY. WHEN Joseph Prestwich entered upon his City career, which was to last over forty years, he was about eighteen years of age. It was not the career he would have chosen, it was not congenial, but circumstances were such that it was his duty to adopt it, and there- fore he applied himself to business with all the con- scientiousness and earnestness of his nature. Perhaps there are few endowed as he was, who would have had the moral courage to resist the fascinations of science. At the outset he planned out his life and resolved that there should be no interruption to his geological work. The hours at his own disposal he allotted, as before, to the identification of fossils and to the analysis of minerals. Time for that work, and for practical chem- istry as well as for his mathematics and reading, had to be found in the early morning before breakfast and after his return from the City at six or seven in the evening, when each hour had its appointed subject. By this method he was able to accomplish much ; yet one is at a loss to understand how he found leisure JET. 18.] HOME STUDIES. 27 also for painting and for his very successful lithog- raphy. As will be seen by the table on page 28, he gave a stated time to read with his sisters, who were respectively fourteen, fifteen, and nearly seventeen years of age. This unobtrusive little table is strongly significant. It was planned by no promptings from without. The youth seemed to have had an intuitive consciousness that there was something for him to do, that he him- self might aspire to demonstrate some truth in God's nature, and henceforward every hour he could call his own was set apart to train and gird himself for the task. He had an uplifting purpose in life from which he never swerved, and hindrances seemed to be stimu- lants instead of deterrents. Yet with all this stern and persistent devotion to close study, no one more enjoyed with gladness of heart the Christmas dances and family parties. There was constant and affectionate inter- course between the Prestwiches and their young cousins, the children of Mr John Blakeway. One of that large family of ten cousins was Mrs Houquette, with whom there was close intimacy throughout life ; another is Mrs Mushet ; and one is Mrs G. Murray Smith, wife of the publisher. Young Prestwich had a passion for waltzing, an exercise which suited his active temperament, and as quadrille -parties were also then in fashion, there were frequent opportunities for this welcome relaxation from incessant desk and head work. Music was always a great pleasure to him : the only instrument, however, that he played was the flute. Eventually he found that there was time for little else but geology. Saturdays and Sundays came to be regarded as his own, when he went out to observe and learn, and when the foundation was laid of his 28 HOME STUDIES. [1830. 1 § 11 6 lla S- •— c i 3JN U*3 2 S.2 O % ^ I !' this letter, which I urn writing as usual in a hurry, The Himly, my <|r;ir Soph in. n I' I lit- <> nl.jrrl,",, ::in;ill a : lli.'y MIT, i:; I'll II of i literal As they tiro tlnm kept in tho propnr ohmient, you will he nhlc to watch nil tluM-hnn^cH win. h I..K-- place in (Jinn. Kvcry l>Mrrvnl ion, .md I he mm.- you sec \.\\u more you will, I think, wish to loarn, so beautiful are the objects and so wonderful is their variety. Once started, there is no trouble at nil. Keep tho jar in a light place, with occasional HunHhino upon it. 1 have annexed a rough sketch of the jar, so as to indicate its form and general appearance to assist you in getting it up. Trusting that it may prove to you, my dear Sophia, a source of pleasant and profitable recreation in your close confinement,— I remain, your very affecte. uncle, J. PKKSTWIOH, Jr. One of the special subjects to which for some time Prestwich had turned his attention was the question of water-supply, especially with regard to the service of London. Eventually he became the leading auth- ority on this subject, and furnished many reports to public, bodies ;md institutions thai sought l»is advice. In later years be occasionally received in<|uiries from private individuals, who only knew him by reputation, asking him to point out (lie best situation in \vliich to build a country house (giving the range of a, low cou nl ie;;), ;;<> ;is |o ensure a i^ood \va(er supply. Tho request of a. si ranker writing for information about tho elfects of sea waler on blocks of maj.;-nelic iron ore rernxed immediate attention. His first public address on the water-supply of London was jjfivon at tho Royal Institute of llritish Architects, Sth July I S..O, and was published in its Proceedings. Its title was, "On the (Jeoloincal Con- MT. 88.] TERTIARY MEMOIRS. 79 ditions which determine the Relative Value of the Water-bearing Strata of the Tertiary and Cretaceous Series, and on the Probability of finding in the Lower- Members of the latter, beneath London, Fresh and Large Sources of Water Supply." His opinion, how- ever, which was confirmed by the experience of later years, was that the growing needs of London would necessitate in the future) an ampler supply, for which tho far-off mountains of Wales might be the best source. Boforo tho publication of his book on * The Water- bearing Strata,' tho first of three important rnomoirs which will ovor bo associated with his namo was read at tho Geological Society— " On tho Structure of the Strata between tho London Clay and tho Chalk in the London and Eampshire Tertiary Systems. Part I., Tho BaHomont H<*1 of tho London Clay, 1850." This papor is illustrated by twenty admirable sections, and a tablo is givon showing tho goneral range and dis- tribution of tho organic remains of tho basement bod o of tho London Cl ay through tho Hampshire and Lon- don Tertiary districts. The lino of range is taken from tho IH!O of Wight north to Hungerford, thence east to Homo Hay. Thoso three papers were the outcome of years of caroful research : thoy defined the boundaries of indi- vidual bods which had not previously been discrimin- ated, or had boon confused with each other, and the relations of tho Tertiary strata in the .London and Hampshire basins woro demonstrated. It, IIRH boon pointed out by Mr II. B. Woodward1 that Prestwich, commencing in the London area, zealously traversed tho country wherever the Lower 1 Natural Scionce, Au#. 189(5, p. i)l. 80 DR FITTON. [1850-51. Tertiary strata were to be found, and hardly an out- lier of any importance escaped his observation. Mr Whitaker, who more than any other man has followed in the footsteps of Prestwich over this large region, referred in 1872 to the literature of the subject, and remarked that the period 1841 to 1860 "might well be called the ' Prestwichian period/ from the author who first clearly made out the detailed structure of the London basin." l ' Notebook entries for August 1850 record detailed de- scriptions and sections made when on a tour in France. The districts round Boulogne, Glermont, and Beauvais were again explored, and the repeated exhibition of " drift" at Beauvais, and its resemblance to that near Marlborough, attracted his attention. The Abbe Mail- lard was Prestwich's companion at Bracheux for an examination of its sands. Epernay was the locality from which he dated in September, where he was joined by " Morris and Haines," and on this occasion copious notes were made on the " Sables de Billy." Those repeated visits to Epernay bore rich fruit. With the growth of geological knowledge questions continually arise with reference to geological nomen- clature. Perhaps no names of formations have given rise to more discussion than those of Upper and Lower Greensand and Neocomian. The views, therefore, of Dr Fitton — one of the old masters of geology, and the chief English authority on the Cretaceous strata — will be read with interest : — W. H. Fitton to J. Prestwich. 53 UPPER HARLEY STREET, 15th March 1851. MY DEAR SIR, — I hope you are making good progress with your paper ; and I wish to mention to you (as it may save you 1 Mem. Geol. Survey, vol. iv. p. 395. JDT. 38-39.] NEOCOMIAN. 81 the trouble of preparing any long note upon the subject) that, after going through most of the French papers in the ' Bulletin de la Soc. Ge'ol. de France,' I find that the term G-res Vert is so frequently used in a right sense for our L. G. Sand ; whilst, as you know, the French geologists have already distinct and different names for the Upper Green sand (" Craie tufau," " Craie chloritee," " Glauconie crayeuse "), and thus have avoided the impropriety of joining, as we have done, the " Upper " and " Lower " Green sands, which have really no connection. It would be very unlikely that the use of a new term would be accepted, and thought necessary (if that is the only ground on which new names can be acceptable) in France. I think, therefore, after fully considering the subject, that I shall confine myself — at present — to proposing simply to adopt the term " Neocomian " for the lowest divisions of our Cretaceous deposits; making it a part of our Lower G-reen sand, and in- cluding only the groups I., II., and III. of my large Table.1 The groups next above IV. to XIV. of the Table will then be the middle division — distinguished and well known in England ever since 1824-25 by containing G-ryphcea sinuata, and being con- spicuously the middle division of my section at Hythe and Folke- stone (Kent). You will see in the Table that in XIV. (6, No. 45) there is a continuous line of fossils going out there in a very distinct manner. This line is, I am very glad to find, also very distinct in the Hythe section (at Sandgate) ; and there also separates the middle division of the L. Green sand from the uppermost division (XV. and XVI. of the Table), which, both at Atherfield and near Folkestone, consists chiefly of pure whitish or buff and yellowish-gray sand, with very few fossils (yet with some shells, and these sometimes silicified !). This upper division of the L. G. S. occurs in France (and I suspect also in Switzerland, where it has caused some perplexity). The " Gault " is immediately above this upper light-coloured sandy division, and makes a strongly contrasted boundary. I think of giving a short sketch of the progress of inquiry, so far as the Neocomian and our L. G. sand are concerned. This will enable me to give an account of the orginal Terrain "Neocomien " 1 See Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. iii. p. 289. F 82 GODWIN-AUSTEN. [l851. — or rather, as it was called at first, of the Terrain crttace' inftricur. And I hope thus to make everything clear as to the identities and differences existing between our group and some of those on the Continent. When the members of the Palseontological Society come to Upper Gfreensand they will be enabled to judge of the expediency of making a new name for that deposit. And this additional change will by that time have been rendered more easy — to introduce further alterations if they should then be desired. But in the meantime I should not republish my note about Vectine.1 — Yours very truly, W. H. FITTON. One of the intimate friends who was frequently his companion in Easter expeditions was Mr R. A. C. Godwin- Austen, F.R.S., one of the most distinguished geologists of his day, whose acute reasoning was shown in his famous paper on the probable underground extension of the Coal Measures in the south-east of England. A warm friendship existed between them, which was only severed by the death of Godwin- Austen in 1884.2 They often went abroad together, perhaps for a few days at a time, to France or Belgium, to work out the geology of some particular district — the route having been carefully planned. The following letter throws a light on our geologist's pro- ceedings. He had indeed made for himself a position altogether unique :— From R. A. C. [Gfodwin-]Austen to J. Prestwich. CHILWORTH, April 7, 1851. DEAE PRESTWICH, — Do you intend to take your geological pupils into the country this Easter? If so, I am ready for a 1 See Proc. Geol. Soc., vol. iv. p. 406, and Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. i. p. 189. 2 Mr Austen took the additional name of Godwin in 1854. He was born in 1808. Photo by Jl'. 7. Hawker, Bournemouth. R. A. C. GODWIN-AUSTEN, F.R.S. Ml. 39.] MURCHISON. 83 tramp over any formation, but the less argillaceous it is the better. I will leave it to Sharpe to fight the battle about dinner. All I stipulate for (Farnham being my prompter) is, that you will allow us breakfasts. What do you think of Oxford, commencing with Cumnor Hurst, and so looking up the old Doctor [Fitton] over his Headington, Garsington, Hazeley, Tetsworth, and Thame sections, and so on to Tring ? I shall not be able to be at the next " Geological " ; but should it be proposed to renew the walk of the last year or two, I will join the force any day, anywhere, you may name. Do not let my suggestion as to the district influence you. I am such a wanderer in our wide field that any district will come alike to me. — Ever yours very truly, E. A. C. AUSTEN. The next letter is from another geologist, also with a request for Joseph Prestwich to join in an excursion :— Sir E. I. Murchison to J. Prestivich. 16 BELGRAVR SQUARE, April 14. 1851. MY DEAR Sm, — Would it suit your book to make a run of a day or two to the other side of the Weald, looking at a few points by the way, and at some of the transverse splits in the S. Downs ? I intend to look at the valley of the Cuckmere, E. of Brighton, and at the " Wealden Drift " of Barcombe, mentioned by Mantell and Lyell. I think of going on Thursday next. I shall probably return by the other side of the county — vid Pulborough and Guildford. It would be gratifying to me to have a playfellow like yourself for a part, at all events, of my tramp ; and if you have a little holiday, you may not dislike to employ it to some extent in this way. — Ever yours, BOD. I. MURCHISON. The careful research necessary for the elaboration of his Tertiary papers also aided him largely in the acquisition of his knowledge of the permeable and impermeable strata, and of the action of springs and 84 THE WATER-BEARING STRATA. [1851. underground waters. In 1851 his volume on 'The Water-bearing Strata of the Country around London, with reference especially to the Water- Supply of the Metropolis/ was published by his friend Van Voorst, and was most favourably received.1 His complete mastery of the subject must have taken the public by surprise. The author used often laughingly to affirm, that if he had only at that time set up as a consulting water engineer, he would have become a rich man. It was probably about this date, or it might have been earlier, that a proposal was made to him to join the late Mr Allnutt, father of the first Lady Brassey, in business as active partner. This partnership wrould possibly have led the way to fortune, but Joseph Prest- wich (who had been his own master from the time he had assumed the headship of his father's firm) saw that under such circumstances his City work would become more exacting — that it would in a greater measure interfere with and curtail his leisure for geologising : on that account, and while fully alive to all the advan- tages offered, he declined. It will be gleaned from the following letter to Mrs Russell Scott that he had under consideration a plan for exchanging City work for some other avocation in which he felt that his talents might be turned to better account :— LONDON, 17th May 1851. You have exactly expressed, my own dear sister, that which I feel upon the subject of my work. I care very little about any pecuniary benefit it may be to me, provided the plan should prove 1 This issue was limited, for the large plate which accompanied the volume was accidentally destroyed before sufficient copies were printed off. In 1895, however, a new issue was published (without the plate), and this contains much new matter and some corrections in the form of a supplement. 2BT. 39.] BUSINESS AND GEOLOGY. 85 of benefit and advantage to my fellow-men, — but more especially do I hope and trust that it may lead to some amelioration in the condition of those who, by circumstances, are placed in a position of toil and hardship which we who are in a more fortunate posi- tion should as a duty alleviate as far as lies in our power. The misery I see around me is indeed sad, — it makes my heart bleed. It is on this account that I must feel my dependent situation— my inability to assist more effectually in the improvement and welfare of the poorer classes. Then again, with reference to Clapham, I deeply feel the responsibility to maintain a proper provision for them — such as they have been accustomed to. It is these considerations, and not a mere question of £ s. d., that lead me to hope, as a possible contingency, that some change in my present position may result from this work. Then again, as a secondary consideration, I feel that I am out of place here — that my time and labour are not employed in those channels in which they might yield their proper return. I feel that I could make more of them, not only for my own benefit, but also in that of which I feel the paramount importance — the progress of science and its application to our improvement, intellectual and physical. It is therefore with regard to the public advantage, which I hope would result from the carrying out of my plans, that I should feel disappointed if my calculations should not prove correct. Their success would be an ample reward to me, and no disappointment should I experience on my own account by that proving the only one. — In haste, I remain, my dearest Isabella, ever your affectionate brother, J. PRESTWICH. Nothing came of the project mentioned in the above letter. Before long Prestwich was again taking one of those business journeys during which he contrived to make fresh geological observations, as may be inferred from the following letter :— J. Prestwich to Sir Charles LyelL DORCHESTER, 21st June 1851. MY DEAR SIR, — I shall be most happy to take a short excursion. I fear that we cannot reach the Eeculvers or Sandwich, but there 86 HOLMFIRTH FLOOD. [1851-52. is an intermediate section of great interest at Upnor, near Eochester, which we might easily visit by means of a return day ticket on the North Kent line ; or, if you prefer, we can take a day ticket to Maidstone, and examine the Drift and Greensands. With regard to the Reculvers and Sandwich, I will give you full particulars of the best localities and points, and mark them on the Ordnance Map, in case you wish to visit them on your way to Belgium. I forgot to mention the Abbey Wood cutting. It is very interesting. The other section, however, which I men- tioned, on Plumstead Heath, shows the same phenomena. I arn not going beyond this town. To-morrow I hope to spend in the Isle of Purbeck, and expect to be in London on Tuesday. I shall not, therefore, fail to be present at the next meeting, when I shall be happy to arrange the excursion in any way that may be most agreeable to you, and remain, my dear sir, yours very truly, J. PRESTWICH. The date of publication of his paper " On the Drift at Sangatte Cliff, near Calais," was 1851, while that "On some of the Effects of the Holmfirth Flood" was published in the volume of the Geological Society for 1852. Reference is made to the latter in the following note :— J. Prestwich to W. Cunnington. DERBY, 8th March 1852. DEAR CUNNINGTON, — ... I went from Huddersfield to Holmfirth and then on to the Bilberry reservoir. The effects of the flood were most remarkable. The valley was in many places literally strewed with debris of sand, gravel, and rock, 1 to 6 feet thick. Transported blocks of 2 to 5 feet were common. One huge fellow measured 22 feet by 6 and 2J deep. Talk of glaciers ! it would have taken one fifty years to have done what this water-power did in an hour. — Yours very truly, J. PEESTWICH. The third of Prestwich's great Tertiary memoirs was likewise published in the Geological Society's Journal ^T. 39-40.] GEOLOGICAL PAPERS. 87 for 1852, thus appearing two years in advance of the second part. Its title was, " On the Structure of the Strata between the London Clay and the Chalk in the London and Hampshire Tertiary Systems. Part III., The Thanet Sands." The entry in the note-book for this year is : " Easter Excursion, 6th to 15th April 1852. — Forbes, Austen, Morris, and myself started on Tuesday for Boulogne. D. Sharpe and Tylor joined us at Calais on Wednesday night." They were met at Tournay by M. Dumont and M. Lambert, who were their guides over the most interesting ground in the vicinity of Mons, Liege, Aix, &c. Another letter to Mrs Russell Scott mentions the amount of time spent on two geological papers : — LONDON, 22nd December 1852. MY DEAREST ISABELLA, — Notwithstanding the troubles I have gone through, I am happy to say that my views and feelings continue as fresh as ever. I have no feelings of disappointment, and an abundance of hope. As contributing to this desirable end, I find geology is a most important adjunct. You must not, however, judge of the amount of labour (one, by the bye, of love, and therefore not felt as a burden but as an enjoyment) by the size of the results. The paper on the Thanet Sands is part of the results of ten to twelve years' researches — that on the Holm- firth Flood is the result of one Sunday's walk on a fine day last February. You are very good to read my papers. I do not expect it. You form an honourable exception to the rest of the family. My poor mother used to be the only member of it who ever had the patience to get through them. I shall be delighted to see the children in town. Kate and her children are coming up to-morrow. With my best love to all the absentees, and wishing them all a happy and merry Christ- mas, I remain, ever your affectionate brother, J. PRESTWICH, Jun. 88 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF FRANCE. [1852-53. During the session of 1852-53 of the Societe Geolo- gique de France, a paper which excited great interest in Paris was communicated to the Society by its English member, Joseph Prestwich. Of the estimate of this paper among French geologists we quote the Notice to the Society in November 1896 by M. Albert Gaudry, the eminent palaeontologist. II visite ensuite longuement FEst du bassin de Paris et le Nord de la France ; enfin, en 1883, Prestwich nous a donne des renseignements de premiere importance " Sur la position geo- logique des sables et du calcaire de Rilly pres Reims " (Bull. Soc. Ge*ol., Ire se"rie, tome x., p. 300). II avait reconnu que les sables de Rilly etaient places a la partie superieure des sables de Bracheux, sur le prolongement des sables de Jonchery et de Chalons-sur-Vesles, position qui est aujourd'hui hors de toute contestation, tandis que Hebert soutenait que ces sables et le cal- caire qui les surmonte formaient une serie distincte, anterieure & toutes les autres formations tertiaires du bassin de Paris. La demonstration de Prestwich paraissait peremptoire, ce- pendant elle ne fut pas admise par Hubert, qui, dans une note detaille, publi^e I'ane'e suivante, maintint ses vues et combattit son contradicteur avec une energie passionnee, persistant a enseigner pendant plus de trente ans la meme erreur dix fois re'pete'e. Justement froisse de la rdponse d'Hebert, M. Prestwich priva notre Bulletin de toute nouvelle communication, et ce n'est que tout a fait a la fin de la vie d'He'bert, que nous Favons vu reprendre ses publications sur le bassin de Paris pour etablir la cornparaison des assises de ce bassin avec celles du bassin de Londres qu'il connaissait a fond et avec le tertiaire beige auquel il s'inte'ressait beaucoup aussi. Les recherches theoriques ne lui faisaient pas negliger les applications pratiques de la science et il s'est occupe activement des questions de recherches d'eau, de houille, et comme conseil pour les grands travaux publics. On peut re*sumer d'un mot son oeuvre geologique en disant qu'elle restera pour nous tous un modele. Better than any words of ours, this quotation shows &T. 40-41.] EDWARD FORBES. 89 the position that Joseph Prestwich held in the world of science in France. During this and the preceding year the subject of this Memoir had been in close correspondence with the lamented Edward Forbes. They were both at work on the geology of the Isle of Wight, yet there is not a shade of jealousy on the part of either. They were both only eager to help each other — eager for the elucidation of truth. Among several letters from this distinguished naturalist, one from Sandown, dated 17th December 1852, begins : — DEAR PRESTWICH, — Your letter is a most interesting one to me, and I hope you will write another, stating objections and suggestions, as it is of consequence to me that I should look to all points whilst I am on the spot. ... I have had your note on Hempstead transcribed and sent down to me, and have been much pleased with it. ... A second long letter from Sandown, of January 16, 1853, enters into detail on the arguments and facts in support of the writer's divisions of the geological beds of the Isle of Wight, and concludes : — As you say, it is difficult to judge of equivalents owing to the very defective French lists. On the general questions discussed at the end of your letter it will be better to talk. I hope you will let me join your Easter expedition — it is exactly where I should like to go ; and with all this fresh in my head, I may be of use. — Ever, dear Prestwich, very sincerely, EDWARD FORBES. This next Easter trip is recorded very briefly. "1853, 25th March. — Lynn with Forbes and Austen." The last letter from Edward Forbes was from Hythe, 25th August 1853. (He died in 1854.) He and our geologist had arranged to make an excursion to France, 90 EDWARD FORBES. [l853. the former to be accompanied by Mrs Forbes. Prest- wich was unable to cross with them, and followed later. Forbes wrote : — I see no reason from your note for deviating from the plans we concocted. If you can leave town sooner than you say, so much the better. Within the limits of being back in England on the 27th of next month, I am in a manner free to move in any direction, and so that we can manage to see all that we pro- posed together, I can spend the time pleasantly and profitably in any direction that may be convenient. ... If you should be delayed longer than you at present anticipate, I would go on to Fontainebleau, and you could pick us up there. If you have any hints or advice to give about seeing points about Paris, a line addressed here will find me until Saturday at midday. — Ever, dear Prestwich, &c., EDWARD FORBES. The biographer of Forbes remarks : " These few weeks in France were weeks of thorough enjoyment. He used to speak of them as his ' honeymoon trip,' and as the very happiest time of his whole life. He made work subservient to enjoyment, and the holiday was in this way the first, not on duty, that Mrs Forbes and he had spent together." 1 Edward Forbes had found out too the charm of the society of his other companion on this expedition — a companion who was so modest and unassuming, so full of knowledge, and ever so ready to impart it. In rough notes for 1853 we read that on September 23rd a visit (no doubt a joint one with E. Forbes) was paid to the famous conchological collection of Deshayes, when among a multitude of shells Prestwich detected a Cyrena semistriata having a strong resemblance " to the unexp. spec, at Deptford." 2 1 Memoir of Edward Forbes, p. 522. 2 See Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. x. p. 138. JST. 41.] ROYAL SOCIETY. 91 1853 was the date of his election into the Royal Society, an honour prized by every man who has done original work. Prestwich's certificate of candidature for the Royal Society was signed by Lyell, De la Beche, Murchison, Edward Forbes, Ramsay, Daniel Sharpe, Bowerbank, John Phillips, W. B. Carpenter, George Busk, and Huxley. J. Prestwich to Sir Charles Lyell. BRISTOL, IBth November 1853. MY DEAR SIR CHARLES, — I am hardly yet prepared to answer your inquiries so distinctly as I could wish. " The Drift " question is so beset with difficulties, and is of such extent, that I cannot venture to bring it forward at one time, but I shall, as with my Tertiary papers, discuss each stage of it separately. I hope, therefore, that you will have returned before I bring for- ward the "Denudation of the Weald," as on that point I should particularly wish to have the advantage of your discussion. In many of Mr Trimmer's views I quite agree, — such as two or three periods of gravel-spread, the more recent date of the mammalifer- ous beds of the Thames valley as compared with the boulder clay, &c., — but in many others I differ. The one to which you allude — viz., the extent of denudation at this first period of sub- sidence— I cannot agree in. The denudation of the Chalk evi- dently commenced at the commencement of the Maestricht period, and was continued through the period of the Thanet Sands to that of the London Clay. During this long interval it seems to me that the Chalk over the Weald was planed down to a mere shell, and in many places worn away, so that the work of denudation left to be done at the more recent "drift" period was comparatively small. But even in this period I do not believe that it was all done at once — there is, I think, on the contrary, evidence of several successive clearances. At the same time, unlike the slow wearing away of the older Eocene period, I believe these recent changes to have been sudden and violent in their operation. Not having my books with me, I can hardly make the references which I could wish. My section (No. 8, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. viii. p. 258) is, as 92 DE LA BECHE. [l854. you observe, merely a representative diagram. It probably conveys my idea as well as a more natural section. . . . It seems to me evident that such a mass of materials derived apparently from the Chalk and Greensands, combined with the distinct thinning off of the chalk, before it was covered by the Tertiaries, as we approached the Wealden, indicates clearly the destruction and removal of a large portion of the Chalk within the Wealden area before the Drift period. Mr Trimmer in his diagram does not seem to allow for the facts. I shall be most happy on my return to town in a week or ten days to draw out a more correct section, and remain, my dear Sir Charles, yours very truly, J. PRESTWICH. My first communication connected with this subject will be on the Ked and Mammaliferous Crags. This I hope to have ready in the spring. Many years elapsed, however, before his papers on these subjects were communicated to the Geological Society. At Easter, in 1854, Prestwich, Austen, Daniel Sharpe, and Forbes paid another visit to France, to explore the districts called the Pays de Bray.1 This year was notable in the life of Prestwich for the production of several papers, but was most memor- able from the fact of a proposition having been made to him, which, if it had been accepted, must have altered his whole life. Sir Henry De la Beche, the well-known founder of the Geological Survey, — his good and constant friend, — wrote to Prestwich offering him the Professorship of Geology at the Thomason College, Roorkee, adding as an inducement that it would be an opportunity for working out the geology of the Himalayas. In the kindest way Sir Henry gave him to understand that every facility would be afforded him for the furtherance of this 1 Memoir of Forbes, p. 531. MT. 42.] SEDGWICK. 93 object, with regard to leave, allowances, &c. The offer was tempting, but there was no hesitation in the answer. It was impossible for Joseph Prestwich to abandon the City firm which held the family for- tunes. Besides, he was not a good subject to begin a career in a climate like that of India : he was forty- two years of age, and his health had suffered from over- work. Added to these reasons, each of which was imperative, there were others which drew and held him to his native soil. He had thrown himself heart and soul into the elaboration of his Tertiary papers ; he was thinking out the intricate problems which, until his Memoirs appeared, had never before been clearly made out. On all counts, therefore, he de- cided to remain and plod on as the hard - working City man. A letter regarding his Tertiary papers from the illustrious Professor Adam Sedgwick l will be read with interest : — A. Sedgwick to J. Prestwich. NORWICH, May n, 1854. MY DEAR SIR, — During the single day I was in London I left one or two of my papers in a parcel addressed to you at the Geological Society. I hope you will accept them as a mark of my respect and gratitude for your very valuable services in dis- entangling the relations of our Tertiary series. It is nearly over with me as a field geologist ; for my health has failed me so that I am now incapable of the hard labour in which I once delighted ; and my eyes have so greatly failed that I am unfitted for the comparatively easy work of collecting specimens in the quarries. Indeed I never was a patient collector, though once I had in- tense pleasure in working among the difficult and puzzling sec- tions of our older rocks : but that work is nearly over on my 1 The Kev. Adam Sedgwick was a Canon of Norwich Cathedral and also Wood ward ian Professor of Geology at Cambridge. Born March 1785 ; died January 27, 1873. 94 TERTIARY MEMOIRS. [l854. part, and others have taken it up with great effect. I should rejoice to see you in Cambridge any time that I am resident. For the next two months I shall be a prisoner in the Cathedral Close. — Very truly yours, A. SEDGWICK. J. Prestwich to Sir Charles Lyell. NORWICH, 3rd July 1854. MY DEAK SIR CHARLES, — I shall be in town in a day or two, but write now to answer your question about the sand-pipes on the escarpment of the N. Downs. I drew attention to the fact in my paper read in March, on account of its importance in showing at how very recent a date the last most important denudation of the Weald took place. The section I gave agrees with your sketch. The slope, when- ever I have seen it, is quite bare, and shows no signs of an old cliff. There is, it is true, a little chalk rubble, but that might arise from pluvial action. — I remain, my dear Sir Charles, yours very truly, J. PRESTWICH. In 1854 we have also an array of papers which appeared during that year. The one which stands first on the list is the second of his Tertiary memoirs, " On the Structure of the Strata between the London Clay and the Chalk in the London and Hampshire Tertiary Systems. Part II., The Woolwich and Head- ing Series." In this paper an account is given of the impressions of fossil leaves from a bed of clay in the railway - cutting for the Newbury branch line, through the hill immediately west of Heading. An excellent plate shows these beautifully preserved im- pressions of plants, and in a note by Sir Joseph D. Hooker, also accompanying Prestwich's paper, the botanist remarks that, " both in a geological and botanical point of view, the Reading fossils are of first-rate interest and importance, as presenting us with an association of forms so entirely analogous to those now existing, as to leave no grounds for assum- Ml. 42.] TERTIARY MEMOIRS. 95 ing that the now prevalent forms of foliage amongst Dicotyledonous plants did not predominate before the glacial epoch, posterior to which all the existing British plants, except the alpines, were introduced into our island, as has been shown by Professor E. Forbes in his Essay on the Flora and Fauna of the British Islands." 1 The paper following it is a short one, " On some Swallow Holes on the Chalk Hills near Canterbury." That which succeeds it is " On the Thickness of the London Clay ; on the Relative Position of the Fossiliferous Beds of Sheppey, High- gate, Harwich, Newnham, Bognor, &c. ; and on the Probable Occurrence of the Bagshot Sands in the Isle of Sheppey." The memoir immediately next to the preceding, and which treats of the same geological formations from the palaepntological side, is entitled, " On the Distinctive Physical and Palseontological Features of the London Clay and Bracklesham Sands ; and on the Independence of these two Groups of Strata." Of these Eocene memoirs, Edward Forbes wrote — and he was no mean judge : " These remarkable essays embody the result of many years' careful observation, and are unexcelled for completeness, minuteness, and excellence of generalisation." It will be observed that in 1854 there was a great amount of published work. It is true that all this geological literature had been thought out and worked at before, yet the amount of patient labour is " amaz- ing," when it is remembered that his daily duties ab- sorbed what are usually deemed the working hours of the day. Besides the writings which were brought out by the 1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. x. p. 165, 1854. 96 THE GROUND BENEATH US. [1854-55. Geological Society in 1854, Prestwich gave the first of three lectures on the 1st May at the Clapham Athenaeum, on the geology of Clapham and of London generally. There was a particular fitness in his de- livering these lectures, as he was a native of the place, and knew every inch of ground described ; they were heartily received (the two other lectures being given in April 1856), and although not written with a view to publication, they were brought out (at the request of friends) in 1857 in book form, as the well-known little work, ' The Ground Beneath Us : Its Geological Phases and Changes.' There were then but few elementary treatises of geology, and none, like those at the present time, which combined the soundest in- struction in the most simple and pleasing language, so as to make geology easy ; therefore it supplied a real want. It was written with the terse clearness which characterises all his writings, and was deservedly popular. Letters of congratulation on the appearance of this booklet poured in from the old geological leaders, some of them couched in the most generous terms. It was acknowledged to be the best possible introduction to geology, and had a large sale. Twenty years later Professor Huxley was heard by the writer to single it out and recommend it to his class for study, as the best exponent of the geology of London and its neighbourhood. Although the record of geological papers for 1855 is shorter than that for 1854, still 1855 is signalised as being the year which produced another of the Tertiary memoirs — those memoirs on which his fame as a geologist will to a certain extent rest. It bears the title, " On the Correlation of the Eocene Tertiaries of England, France, and Belgium." MT. 42-43.] VALLEY GRAVELS. 97 It had been preceded by two papers of relatively less importance, namely, by that " On a Fossiliferous Deposit in the Gravel at West Hackney," and " On a Fossiliferous Bed of the Drift Period near the Reculvers." The two which followed it were, " On the Boring through the Chalk at Kentish Town," and a " Note on the Gravel near Maidenhead, in which the Skull of the Musk Buffalo was found." These were both read in 1855, and appeared in the Geological Society's Journal in 1856. Reference is made to the last paper in the following letter to Mr Lubbock,1 who subsequently was his com- panion in several excursions : — MARK LANE, 10/7/55. MY DEAR SIR, — I am rejoiced to hear of the discovery of the musk-ox in the Maidenhead gravel. . . . There are several other large pits in the valley gravel which may be worth examining. Could you also inquire whether any bones were found in the gravel cutting of the Wycombe Railway at the hill (Folly Hill) adjoining Maidenhead ? I inquired, but was not quite satisfied with the answer I obtained, although it was in the negative and agreed with my general views on the subject. On Saturday last instead of going to Staines I went to Brentwood and Warley. I shall most probably therefore go to Staines on Saturday next, and in that case shall require the map which I herewith send. If you will let me have it on Friday evening or Saturday morning before 12, it will do. Sir C. Lyell and I went to Grays last week, but shall have to return to Ilford probably on Friday or Monday next. We shall not remain long at the pits, but would show them to you, and possibly, if you could accompany us, might have to leave you there, as I fear there might not be room in the carriage of Mr Meeson, who proposes to take us to some other pits in the neighbourhood. The Grays pits are, however, the great features, and these I shall be happy to show you, and to join you again there. Believe me to remain, yours very truly. J. PRESTWICH. 1 Now Sir John Lubbock, Bart. G 98 HIGH-LEVEL GRAVEL. [1855-56. J. Prestwich to Sir Charles Lyell. MARK LANE, 12th July 1855. MY DEAR SIR CHARLES, — Unless business calls me out of town, any alteration of the days will be immaterial to me. I think you will certainly find work for more than one day at Pulborough. On Wednesday, the 18th, I am engaged. Thurs- day and Friday will do for Flower's and Ilford. When we go to Ilford, I should like to take you to Havering-Atte-Bower, Chigwell, and Hainault Forest, so that you may see the relation of the Ilford deposit to the surrounding drifts, which I think always essential. No mammalian remains have ever been found in the high- level gravel, nor I believe in the mid-level, though the oppor- tunities for finding them are almost equally good as in the valley gravel. The bones brought by Mr Lubbock from the valley gravel of Maidenhead prove to belong to the musk-ox, — the first found in this country, — a capital fact. A newspaper paragraph which I have not yet seen announces the discovery also of bones and tusks in some gravel beds near Kingston. The correction of my Correlation paper reminds me of some questions I had to ask you. You give a list of shells from beds of sandstone in your section of Cassel Hill (Q. J. Geol. Soc., vol. viii. p. 331). May not these beds belong to the Nummulites planulatus series ? Although this fossil is not found at Cassel, M. D'Archiac alludes to fossiliferous beds of that age at Cassel. I have ventured to refer to that list (p. 3) as possibly belonging to the Lits Coquilliers zone. Can you now furnish me with a more complete list of the shells of the N. planulatus series than you possessed in 1852 ? Have you also increased your list of fossils of the N. Icevigatus (Calcaire Gfrossier) series of Belgium ? If you can give me any information on these points I shall feel much obliged, and remain, dear Sir Charles, yours very truly, J. PRESTWICH. — I should much like to see Forbes's MS. about the gravels. He has, I see, adopted my term of high- and low-level gravels, and I believe agreed in several of my views. How JET. 43-44.] TREASURER OF GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 99 deeply I regret he is not amongst us to continue the inquiry and description with us. The following note, also to Sir Charles Lyell, gives a little glimpse of Prestwich's life in Mark Lane : — MARK LANE, Monday, 1855. MY DEAR SIR CHARLES, — I am not surprised that you com- plained of the exchanged coat. You have the best reason for doing so. On returning home this morning a red label on a coat on the sofa caught my eye. My housekeeper sometimes places there an old coat of mine that I use to read or work in. This is missing. When here on Thursday you must have placed yours on or by mine on the sofa, and in going away have taken up the wrong coat. I am glad to find that the exchange was made here and not in the railway carriage. ... I hasten to return your coat, which I hope you have not wanted, and remain yours very truly, J. PRESTWICH. P.S. — I walked yesterday through a good cutting of the Lower Bagshot at Stroud Green and one good one of the Middle (Green- sand) Bagshot at King's Beeches. I found no fossils, but traced the Wealden gravel over some extent of the ground. I have found the same gravel, but not quite so mixed with L. G. S., at Hazely near Strathfieldsaye. In 1855 Prestwich was elected as one of the Secre- taries of the Geological Society, Mr J. Carrick Moore being the other Secretary. This honorary post he occupied only one year, as in 1856 he became Treasurer of the Society, an office which he held until 1868. In this year he read his second correlation paper, " On the Correlation of the [Middle] Eocene Tertiaries of England, France, and Belgium." This was published in 1857. The following letter from Sir Charles Lyell refers to this paper, and especially to the list it contains of those Bracklesham shells which occur also in the Paris 100 CITY LIFE. [1856-57. Tertiaries, showing their vertical distribution in the latter series. The table given in this paper of the Barton fossils, with their equivalents in France and Belgium, is also most elaborate. MILDENHALL, SUFFOLK, Janry. 30, 1857. MY DEAR PRESTWICH, — I only received your proof to-day, sent me here into the country. It makes me very desirous to see more — please to send me other proofs : as I return to town to-morrow, I shall be able to let you have them again immediately. I have not sent to the press my pp. in which I adopt the term Lower Miocene as the name for what I have called in 5th edn. Upper Eocene, but I must send them in a few days. Your paper interests me much — the tables at p. 10 [pp. 93, 118] in particular. They are well imagined and startling, and remind one of Barrande's Colonies, on which I am writing — two adjoining, contemporaneous, distinct natural-history provinces. You have brought out the difference well. Darwin will make much of it. Some barrier there must have been, but I daresay the so-called species are permanent varieties, as you suggest, in many cases — like Lowe's varieties of many land shells in the different Madeira islands, which he makes into species. If you give a general table pray send it to me, that I may see your divisions. — Ever, &c., CHAS. LYELL. Perhaps Prestwich's mode of life at this time con- duced to the marvellous amount of published work. Before he had assumed control of City affairs Mark Lane had been his home, where an old housekeeper ministered to his wants and provided — in conformity with instructions — his very simple fare. Soon after dinner, or about eight or nine o'clock, the note-books were by his side, with maps and sections ; and with a sheaf of foolscap before him, it became his regular practice to write far on into the night. It was thus MT. 44-45.] DEATH OF HIS FATHEil. 101 in the hours robbed from sleep that the Tertiary memoirs were penned. He pursued this course, this " burning the candle at both ends," not without mis- givings on the part of his friends — and they were many. When practicable he went into the country from Saturday until Monday, and thus had a refresh- ing change — a change which, it is needless to add, was utilised for his geology. Also he occasionally spent an evening with one of his married sisters, the three nearest in age having then their own homes. The genial nature of the man w^as shown by the evening parties which he contrived to give in his bachelor City establishment, when there was a goodly muster of relatives and young cousins, whom he de- lighted to have round him, and amongst whom there was always unanimity as to the great success of " Cousin Joseph's party." Of course there was dancing for the young people, no one joining in it with more zest than the host himself. These parties made a curious yet pleasant break in the monotony of his evening work : in calculating the daily delivery of springs and rivers ; in tabulating lists of fossils ; in the careful drawing of maps and sections ; in think- ing out, and in throwing new light upon, obscure problems in geology. The death of our geologist's father, which took place in November 1856, made a great change in his life, as it led to his return to the family home, where his youngest sister, Civil Prestwich, was left alone. Although his father was a man of culture, he had little interest in science : but it was from him, doubtless, that Joseph Prestwich inherited his artistic power and fastidiousness in matters of taste. Collec- tions of specimens of minerals, &c., which had grown 102 - ^CrVlL" F&ESTWICH. [1857. in bulk in Mark Lane,1 of course accompanied him, the fossils and sands and clays going, as we can believe, without regret on the part of the worthy old housekeeper. Civil Prestwich was ten years younger than her brother, and they had a joint home until her death in 1866. She at once became his secretary and amanuensis, devoting her whole time to the fur- therance of his scientific work, freeing his mind and time from all the wear and tear of petty distractions. He was eminently domestic : instead of the solitary City sitting-room and that daily Spartan fare, he had now all the comforts of a happy home. Civil was capable and intelligent, and under our geologist's guidance rough manuscripts were transcribed, registers were kept ; and a folio volume of references which lies open before us is entirely in her handwriting, and is a model of method and order. There are four columns —for England, France, Europe, and other parts of the world — and the authors quoted imply a wide range of research, although chiefly on Eocene, Miocene, and later Tertiary geology. They include also subjects which were discussed in subsequent writings, such as Raised Beaches, Drift, Boulder Clay, Glacial Action, River Deltas, Wear and Tear of Land, Caves, Temperatures of Mines, &c., and Theoretical and Cosmical Geology. J. Prestwich to Sir Charles Lyell. 2 SUFFOLK LANE, 2nd January 1857. MY DEAR SIR CHARLES, — The question is a difficult one. If Forbes is right in his synchronism of the Hempstead Beds with the Fontainebleau Sands, then I do not see where to draw the line of demarcation between those beds and the Barton Clays. 1 The business house was subsequently 2 Suffolk Lane, Cannon Street, and, about the year 1862, 69 Mark Lane. /*! V s*~.s, _^-^-i. s~~j.T^ C *"^-~^7 ^— f-t^eS ^y^y -^ ;..-*/: J ^- ^Je/x^ RAISED BEACH AT KRAUNTON, 1855. 2ET. 45.] CORRELATION OF TERTIARY STRATA. 103 I am, however, not yet quite satisfied on the question of parallel- ism, nor is it one on which I would venture on a positive opinion without the few months' research I hope to be able to devote to it this summer. At present, however, I am inclined strongly to place the Gres de Fontainebleau in the Eocene period. I think it will be a great pity to break up these great time divisions into small sections. Let us have, if they like, Lower, Middle, and Upper Eocene, and Miocene, &c., but not a multitude of terms founded on that base. . . . — Yours very truly, J. PRESTWICH. J. Prestwich to Sir Charles Lyell. [14] CLIFTON ROAD EAST [ST JOHN'S WOOD], 12th Jany. 1857. MY DEAR SIR CHARLES,— The pressure of business, of family engagements, and a visit to consult various books on the subject of your inquiry, have been the cause of too long a delay in answering your last notes. The correlation by Forbes of the Hempstead series with those of Limburg seems correct enough, but the English beds are so much related to those beneath the Belgian beds also, tho' possibly to a lesser extent; whilst, according to Hebert and others, the Gres de Fontainebleau is so little, or is rather so very distinct, — that I cannot yet feel quite satisfied that there is not an error somewhere or other. I cannot reconcile myself to the association in the same time- division of the Faluns of Touraine and the Fontainebleau Sands. It is true that if the former are to be excluded, the Miocene period becomes reduced to very narrow limits, or rather ex- hibition, in France and England ; but then there is the point to which you allude, whether in other parts of Europe we may not find the time marks, the strata of that period. I think we must. If the Miocene has yet to have its limits defined, and the Fontainebleau Sands are to be considered as the commencement of a new period of change, then I think we must look elsewhere than in the French Faluns for the maximum development of its peculiar types. I should not at all object in that way to take the Fontainebleau Sands as Lower Miocene, filling up the centre and top with German or yet to be discovered beds, but then I should feel inclined to take the Faluns of Touraine as part of 104 CORRELATION OF TERTIARY STRATA. [l857. another time stage. I was not at all satisfied from what I saw at Bordeaux of the connection there said by some to exist be- tween the equiv. of the F. Sands and the Faluns. The Fal. of Leognan are said to underlie certain freshwater limestones said to be synchr. with those of La Brise" — this was not at all clear to me. One fact was very [clear], that the Fal. of Sancats did overlie that limestone, and that the latter probably overlaid the Font. Sands ; but then between the limestone and the Sancats Fal. I found no passage — on the contrary, I found a marked division. The limestone was all fresh-water, and its surface was worn and covered with the holes of boring molluscs. I think this had not been noticed before. . . . With regard to the other questions you ask me, I think the Barton Beds at Barton form quite an exceptional state of things. I have shown in my last paper that that series is exceptionally a sandy series, and that the clays set in in places, and I take the Headon Hill Sands as rather the type than the exception. Certainly the line should not, I think, be drawn between the Barton Clays and the Headon Hill Sands. I think I shall draw my next sub-line at the base of the old Upper Marine, but to this point I have not yet come. I am most anxious to see Forbes's work on the Isle of Wight, to study more accurately the fossil evidence he has based his divisions upon. I hope shortly to have more leisure to resume geology and to attend to treasurership duties. In the meantime I am snatching a few moments to get a paper ready for the next meeting. The subject will, I think, interest you, " Crag on the North Downs." — Yours very sincerely, J. PEESTWICH. J. Prestwich to the Same. SUFFOLK LANE, Monday, 9th Feb. 1857. MY DEAR SIR CHARLES, — I do object very much to placing the Sables de Bracheux on the parallel of the Thanet Sands. It is possible, however, that the latter may come into some part of the French area ; and in mineral character there would be so little to distinguish them that they would all pass under the name of the G-lauconie Infe'rieure, but I think they would be found to pass under the S. de B. I know of no solid argument adduced by Hebert. It is a point I worked out with great care, and it was only after a long time that I obtained evidence to be depended upon. It Photo by Elliott & Fry. SIR JOHN EVANS, K.C.B. JET. 45.] MR JOHN EVANS. 105 could not be done in France — the evidence is wanting. At Kichborough the one distinctly overlies the other. See my first paper on the " Correlation of the French and English Tertiaries." There are a few species in common, but the bulk are different. — In haste, ever truly yours, J. PRESTWICH. Before the date of the annexed note Joseph Prest- wich made the acquaintance in the railway carriage of a fellow-traveller who had likewise been summoned as a witness, though on the opposite side, of a cause set down for trial at the Kingston Assizes with regard to a water question at Croydon. They had travelled to Kingston in the same carriage without interchange of a word ; but, as for some reason the trial did not come off that day, they found themselves in the after- noon again in the same railway carriage, when they entered into conversation and found that they had many interests in common. This was our geologist's first meeting with Mr John Evans of Nash Mills, Hemel Hempstead, who in a letter to the writer re- marks : "I took a great liking for him, and I think that he did not dislike me, and the result was that I called on him in Mark Lane and he returned the visit at Nash Mills, and thus began a friendship which lasted forty years, and which most materially influ- enced the course of my life. I cannot at present call to mind the exact year of our meeting, but our friend- ship was already of some standing when in 1857 he introduced me to the Geological Society." Much pleasant field-work was afterwards accomplished by the two friends, and when they differed on geological questions — as differ they did — it never caused the slightest abatement nor estrangement of the brotherly affection which had grown up between them, and which was ever the same to the end. 106 DR J. D. HOOKER. [1857-58. J. Prestwich to J. Evans. LONDON, Oct. 24/57. MY DEAR SIR, — Elephants appear to have been common at Bedford in former days. Last year, or the year before, the bones apparently of a whole herd were found in the railway cutting a few miles north of the town. I have that place in view for a trip next season, and shall be glad if we can manage it together. — With kind regards to Mrs Evans, I am ever truly yours, Jos. PRESTWICH. My trip to the Alps is still in nubibus, as probably the Alps themselves now are. Dr J. D. Hooker to J. Prestwicli. KEW, Sunday [1857]. DEAR MR PRESTWICH, — I am very much obliged for your in- teresting, and to me most instructive, lectures to the Clapham Athenaeum. I have had the Reading leaves in my mind very often, and saw Dr De la Harpe when he was here. He failed in persuading me of the correctness of his views, from what in such cases is too much the inevitable cause, namely, the preoccupation of my mind with my own conclusions ! I cannot see even a probability (much less an evidence) of any of the leaves being referable to laurels, Sapindacese, Eugenias, Rhus, and Cassia, all of which Dr De la Harpe does not seem to regard as tropical families, which they most eminently are. It is true that some species of each are extra-tropical, but plenty of species of the European trees (amongst which I would prefer to seek analogues for the Eeading leaves) are also subtropical and tropical. No. 51 of your woodcuts can have nothing to do with Rhus, though as species of Rhus have both simple and compound leaves of all shapes and many varieties of nervation and texture, it would be difficult to find a looser or less tangible affinity. With regard to 52, which he refers to fig or mulberry, it would be difficult to find a leaf that could not be compared with some fig or other of the 200 or 300 known species of that genus ; and as figs are eminently tropical and mulberries temperate plants, nothing could be more vague than such an identification. VET. 45-46.] EOCENE PLANTS. 107 The long and short is that De la Harpe's conclusions do really indicate a very tropical flora. The one thing that De la Harpe and I agree in is that the leaves do belong to the very commonest forms in the vegetable kingdom of dicot. plants. — Believe me, ever most truly yours, Jos. D. HOOKER. Besides " The Ground beneath Us," only one paper was contributed in 1857, namely, that " On some Fossiliferous Iron Sandstone occurring in the North Downs," and this under a slightly modified title was published during the following year. J. Prestwich to Dr [Sir] Joseph D. Hooker. CANTERBURY, Janry. 30/58. DEAR DR HOOKER, — I am much obliged by your criticisms on my observations about the Heading leaves. You have, I suppose, seen Dr De la Harpe's paper recently published in the Bulln. Soc. Vaudoise. I feel that further evidence is necessary, and must try if the Heading cutting is still accessible. They were at work in the bed in a side cutting last spring. Could you pos- sibly manage to run down some warm spring day, for the work is too sedentary for this weather ? I should much like to go down with you. The leaves are most abundant, and you might see much that might escape me. First of all, however, I should very much like to look into the evidence myself to the small extent that I may venture by the inspection of the forms of leaves under your guidance. My sister also wants to look at some forms of ferns and a palm (?) that can be associated for cultivation in our smoky atmosphere — not as a botanist, but for the pleasantness of green leaves and beauty of form. We pur- pose, then, visiting Kew Gardens some Saturday (now a compara- tively leisure day with me), and if you could kindly spare me an hour or two to put me in the way of looking right and at the right things, I shall feel particularly obliged. I shall be in town again after Tuesday, and am yours most truly, Jos. PRESTWICH. The following letter from the veteran geologist, Mr 108 THE GROUND BENEATH US. [l858. Leonard Horner, father of Lady Lyell, expresses his interest in our geologist's work : — L. Horner to J. Prestwich. MANCHESTER, 7th March 1858. MY DEAK PRESTWICH, — It is only within the last three days that I have had an opportunity of reading " The Ground Beneath Us." Here in the evening, when the spinning -jennies are at rest, and when there are few temptations of parties and learned societies, I get through some very agreeable reading, as we gener- ally bring with us a good supply of books. I do not know when I have read anything geological that has pleased me so much as these three lectures. In a clear attractive style you have de- scribed the great and minute features of the area, not in the least descending to what is commonly called " a popular view," but a masterly sketch, that must be perfectly intelligible to every educated person who for the first time has had geological pheno- mena placed before him, and embracing those great generalisa- tions which must awaken the deepest interest and wonder. You will do a great service to the cause of philosophical truth, will awaken a widespread interest in geology, especially among those living in the district you describe, — you will give a death- blow among them to the nonsense of Mosaic geology now so widely disseminated, if you will publish these lectures, not by Van Voorst, but by some publisher of extensive connections, such as Longmans or Murray. You have no occasion to add any- thing. I would omit from the title-page "being three lectures on," &c., down to " 1856." You can tell this in a brief preface. If you will do this, the little volume will be translated, I have no doubt, both in French and German. It would be best in 12mo, and the two plates might fold lengthways. The only criticism I have to make is to request you to consider what you say at p. 77, that the alterations in the proportions of sea and land could not cause a heat sufficient for the tropical organisms of the London Clay, by reading again Lyell's chapters on Climate in the last edition of his ' Principles.' But I have not done with you : follow up the sketch with a volume fully descriptive of the same period. You say, p. 37, " I could have said much more." I hope you will say all you have to say. — Yours faithfully, LEONARD HORNER. JET . 46.] LEONARD HORNER. 109 The above letter revives happy personal recollections of Mr Horner, whose kindliness and steady friendliness made a deep impression on the writer. Mrs Horner died at Florence on the 22nd May 1862, and about a month later a copy was sent from there of the pathetic inscription on her tombstone in the Protestant ceme- tery. The last lines run :— " Thus do we walk with her, and keep unbroken The bond which Nature gives ; Thinking that our remembrance, though unspoken, May reach her where she lives." The little message in his handwriting in the corner of the paper — "with much regard, L. H." — has been a prized memento of both. In less than two years he had rejoined her, his death having taken place early in March 1864. Mr Horner had been twice elected President of the Geological Society. 110 CHAPTER V. 1858-1859. BEIXHAM CAVE — FLINT IMPLEMENTS — VISITS TO ABBEVILLE — GOWER CAVES. PRESTWICH'S attention for some time had been occupied with fossiliferous deposits in the Drift and with raised beaches, his investigations of the latter leading to those wide generalisations which later he was to give the world in a series of papers to the Royal Society. As a whole, his work had been chiefly in stratigraphical geology : he had worked out in detail the structure of the London and Hampshire basins as no one else had done, and he had made himself the chief geological authority on water-supply. But his powers were now to be directed to a new field of research, in which he became an acknowledged pioneer, and which brought about a complete revolution of modern thought re- garding the antiquity of the human race. In this new inquiry his extraordinary memory was of especial service. He never forgot what he had observed and written, so as years went on and fresh discoveries threw further light on unsettled questions, this gift of memory enabled him to bring all his accumulated knowledge to bear upon the subject immediately under consideration. DK HUGH FALCONER, F.R.S. JET. 46.] HUGH FALCONER. Ill In his researches now on the antiquity of man, he went hand in hand with his friend, Dr Hugh Falconer,1 who two or three years before had returned to England from a long career in the East, where for a time he had been director of the Botanic Gardens at Saharunpore, and subsequently of those at Calcutta. It was, how- ever, as a paleontologist that Hugh Falconer was best known, and as joint author with Sir Proby Cautley of a work on the fossil fauna of the Sewalik Hills, the ' Fauna Antiqua Sivalensis.' Ossiferous caves had from time to time been dis- covered in England, but after the publication of Dr Buckland's 'Reliquiae Diluvianae' in 1823, the subject long ceased to attract attention. Falconer and Prest- wich were, however, cognisant of the fact that the fossil contents of several caverns had been crowded together pell-mell in local museums, occasionally with- out any label to show where they had been found. Both palaeontologist and geologist were keenly alive to the importance of carefully working out any cave evidence, and the opportunity they sought soon offered for the systematic excavation of the contents of a cavern. On the 10th of May 1858, Dr Falconer addressed a letter to the Secretary of the Geological Society of London, announcing the discovery of a new and un- disturbed cave on Windmill Hill overhanging Brixham village, near Torquay. It was situated on a slope in the same tract of Devonian limestone in which the caverns of Kent's Hole, Anstey's Cove, Chudleigh, and Berry Head are found. Mr Philp, a dyer, had bought the site with the intention of utilising the limestone and building cottages, when, in November 1857, a small hole was detected in quarrying. Further work revealed 1 Born February 29, 1808 ; died January 31, 1865. 112 BRIXHAM CAVE. [l858. a wider opening, and in the spring of 1858 the work- men were no longer in doubt but that they had come upon the entrance of a cave with branches. Dr Falconer urged that, as the fossil contents of several important English caves had been extracted without care or atten- tion, and had been scattered piecemeal, the Council should take immediate steps to prevent this being repeated in the case of the Brixham cave, and should arrange for systematic investigation. The consequence of this letter was, that a recom- mendatory resolution was passed by the Council of the Geological Society, with the result that " the Royal Society, on May 13th, gave a grant of £100 towards the exploration of the cave in the manner suggested by Dr Falconer. Miss Burdett - Coutts contributed £50 towards the same object. At Dr Falconer's sug- gestion, a committee was appointed to carry the design into effect. The committee consisted of Professor Ramsay, Mr Prestwich, Sir Charles Lyell, Professor Owen, Mr Beckles, the Rev. R. Everest, and Mr Godwin - Austen. Dr Falconer was entrusted with laying down the plan and giving the instructions upon which the exploration was to be conducted, and the works were carried on under the immediate superin- tendence of Mr Pengelly. The fossil remains were identified by Dr Falconer. On the 9th September 1858 a report on the progress of the operations, drawn up by Professor Ramsay, Mr Pengelly, and Dr Falconer, was submitted to the General Committee, and by them was forwarded to the Royal Society, which, from the importance of the results already elicited, voted an additional sum of £100 to prosecute the inquiry." Almost immediately afterwards Dr Falconer was com- pelled to proceed to the south of Europe on account JET. 46.] BBIXHAM CAVE. 113 of his health, but the explorations were continued with unflagging energy and enthusiasm by Mr Pengelly.1 Prestwich heartily co-operated with Falconer, and approved of all the steps taken. Several years later, owing to the death of Hugh Falconer, at the request of the General Committee he drew up the final report on Brixham Cave. The excavations in it yielded rude flint implements of human workmanship, associated with the fossil bones of Pleistocene mammalia, thus indicating the presence of early man. It may not be out of place here to transcribe the following letter, which was published in the first volume of the ' Geologist ' (p. 252). It shows the interest with which the discoveries in Brixham Cave were welcomed, and its date almost coincides with that of Dr Falconer's letter to the Geological Society : — To the Editor of the ' Geologist.' [10] KENT TERRACE, llth May 1858. SIR, — Amongst the many interesting problems we have to in- vestigate, and that are, now in particular, attracting the attention of geologists, is that which relates to the character of the fauna inhabiting this land during some of the later geological periods. Those only who have worked at this subject can form any idea of the vast number of elephants, rhinoceroses, oxen, deer, &c., which must, at more than one period, have flourished in this country on surfaces now buried beneath drift and gravel. Occa- sionally their bones are met with in very large quantities, but their distribution is very irregular and uncertain. The fact of their occurrence, however, frequently remains unknown beyond the place where the discovery is made, and the knowledge of such facts is too often lost or forgotten for want of a convenient and ready record.2 Your pages could afford, sir, exactly the 1 Palaeontological Memoirs : Hugh Falconer, vol. ii. p. 486. 2 "There is a case in point in another communication I have sent you. In that instance I happened to visit a gravel-pit, opened only temporarily, and find remains of elephants, of which no record would have been pre- served but for my chance visit. See ' Geologist,' vol. i. p. 252." H 114 FOSSIL MAMMALS. [1858. facilities required. Thus it would be of great use, and I, for my own part, should feel particularly obliged if any of your corre- spondents in different parts of the country could furnish us with information on this point. I would confine myself more especi- ally to the occurrence of the bones of elephants (the teeth and tusks being so easily recognised), although, at the same time, any information respecting the bones of other animals would be very acceptable ; and I would ask for a mention of their occurrence — naming place, character of deposit, depth beneath the surface, position, whether in valley or on hill, &c. Such information you might tabulate monthly or quarterly, mentioning the authority. Or what would form a still more valuable record would be, that resident correspondents should each take a county, and give a list of places where such remains are or have been found. We particularly require information in this respect with reference to Northumberland, Lancashire, Cumberland, Cheshire, and other northern counties, although in the more southern counties the same particulars are also in many cases equally required. An additional interest now attaches to this subject, from the circum- stance that there are indications of each different stage of this Pleistocene period having been marked by different species of elephant, &c. If these can be distinguished by the aid of Dr Falconer's forthcoming paper in the ' Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society,' the information furnished will be the more valuable. — I am, sir, yours truly, JOSEPH PKKSTWICH. J. Prestwich to H. Falconer. 10 KENT TERRACE, 7/5/58. MY DEAR DR FALCONER, — I twice had Lartet's paper in my pocket to call on you with it, but was both times prevented by business. I should much like to hear more of your Western progress, and will take an early opportunity to call on you, if possible, before I leave town on Thursday. I shall be at the Koyal Society to-morrow evening. If I do not see you there, I will try to call on you at 5J on Monday. I am the more anxious to hear what you have seen in Devon as I am going there shortly, after first a visit to Eouen, Paris, and Brussels, and intend to visit Banwell and a few other places I have not yet seen. 2ET. 46.] SWITZERLAND. 115 I was at Grays a short time since, and have made a good be- ginning with the plants. I return there again in 2 or 3 weeks to reap, I hope, a further harvest, having set all the people to work, and Mr Meeson having kindly given all the necessary orders to his workmen, and taken charge of all specimens. I went also to Ilford for the same object, but at present without success. I am going again, having a pit opened in the meantime. —Yours very truly, J. PRESTWICH. Our geologist's movements were so rapid that the expedition to the Continent, and also that to Banwell (in Somerset) and Grays (in Essex), were doubtless made before he set out on the 2nd July 1858 on a journey of exploration in the Swiss Alps, which ex- tended over several weeks. He was not accompanied by any English friend, but was frequently joined by Swiss geologists. Much as he delighted in working with friends and sharing with them his matured views, yet, on new ground or in face of any unsolved problem, he preferred to think out the difficulties and every aspect of the case — alone. The contents of a note-book for July and part of August were intended to serve as data for projected papers on glacial action. The first few days were occupied with railway cut- tings and in quarries in the neighbourhood of Neu- chatel. Accompanied by M. Desor, the geologist, and by M. de Pury, the husband of his cousin Henrietta Blakeway, Prestwich visited the Val de Travers in the Jura. The great stratified beds of gravel on the way to Berne were of special interest, and M. Studer pointed out to him the most striking geological features in its vicinity. At Basle he had the advantage of the society and advice of another eminent Swiss geologist, M. Peter 116 SWITZERLAND. [l858. Merian, where the roughly stratified gravel over the flats adjoining the Rhine engaged his attention. The geology of Bex is given in a few sentences, which are followed by a striking outline of Les Diablerets with numerous notes. It was probably on this occasion that he paid the visit at Gryon to M. Renevier, the eminent Professor of Geology at Lausanne, who guided him to Anzeindaz (Alpes Vaudoises), at the foot of the Diab- lerets, where our geologist made a collection of choice little Eocene fossils. Professor Renevier writes that in returning they were overtaken by rain, and arrived at Gryon completely drenched. Chamouni was afterwards Prestwich's headquarters, whence, day after day, ac- companied by a guide, he went from glacier to glacier, never attempting any great ascent. He had looked longingly at certain boulders near the Talefre glacier, where, " perched on the top of this cliff, are several blocks of granite — one just on the edge of the cliff. Could not get at them to see whether foreign to the place." He was intent on ascertaining the rate of movement of the ice, the origin of the boulders, and the composition of the moraine gravels. The numerous notes and sections give the altitude of the moraines of different years, the smoothening or polishing of granite blocks — whether sharp or rounded, angular or sub-angular, or striated — observations on ice-action in every phase, which would chiefly interest an Alpine geologist familiar with the high Alps. One sketch is that of the " ^Iboulement " of Les Mossons, which spreads over half the valley now covered with fields and houses. A guide refers it " au temps du Deluge." Visits to St Gervais and to Sallanches ended this tour in Switzerland. On his return to England it was to find that the MT. 46.] CAVERN RESEARCHES. 117 results obtained from the excavations at Brixham were of much importance. In writing to Falconer on 14th September 1858, he suggests that another cavern might well be explored, " such for example as one on the Welsh coast, or a portion of Kent's Cavern, or 100 yards square of some bone-strewed surface gravel, such as a section of the rich bone-bearing gravel at Bedford, or Brentford, or Clacton, or Herne Bay, or Bracklesham, or many others." The caution expressed in this next letter is char- acteristic :— /. Prestwich to H. Falconer. LONDON, 21s« Septr. 1858. MY DEAR DR FALCONER, — I have to-day read the report and returned it to Earnsay. It will do very well for the London Committee, or the Eoy. Soc., but for my own part I should not like to have it read at the Brit. Assoc. A report of that sort conies with a degree of might and authority which a short notice would not have. The statement you make with regard to human industrial remains is one likely to give rise to so much controversy, and is one which you make so distinctly, that I do not like to see it embodied in a report which may be sup- posed to express the opinions of the several members of the Committee, and in which I see my name introduced. Now, although you have so good a case with regard to occur- rence and position of the worked flints, I yet hesitate to accept the conclusions, and many others will probably do the same. There may be possibilities of mistake which further working may serve to correct, or on the other hand further workings may bring to light other facts tending to prove indisputably the remarkable association you allude to. I quite agree with you that there is now much evidence tend- ing in the same direction — so much that there is hope that, if true, it may receive some unmistakable corroboration : but until we have that, and that I have myself worked on the ground and looked at all the bearings, I hesitate and wait. — My dear Dr Falconer, yours very truly, J. PRESTWICH. 118 FOLKESTONE. [l858. In a note to Falconer, dated 28th September, he remarks : — I am glad you have been to Folkestone. The bones there were in brick-earth or gravel. Those at Dover in chalk rubble. I should fear from what you say and what I have seen that the ruminants are in a state of confusion. It is not surprising, considering that all the Drift deposits have commonly been shovelled together into one dirt heap. — Ever yours truly, J. PRESTWICH. Another letter, dated " Tuesday," refers to the Folkestone fossils. J. Prestwich to H. Falconer. See ' Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc./ vol. vii. p. 261. You will there find a paper by Mackie on a Pleistocene deposit at Folkestone, and among the fossils the hippopotamus and megaceros. Is it possible that the hippopotamus of these late Pleistocene deposits is of the same species as that of the Norfolk coast ? With regard to Shorncliffe, I heard of it too late to visit it. Intending, however, to go, I made inquiries about the where- abouts, and found that although the bones came last from Shorn- cliffe they came first from Folkestone. It is, in fact, the same bed as described by Mackie, and was reopened in enlarging or repairing some of the works connected with the small fort above the Pavilion. The collection is certainly of great interest. — Ever truly yours, J. PRESTWICH. Three of his geological papers appeared this year, the most important being that on the westward ex- tension of the Old Raised Beach of Brighton. It was significant of work to be done in the future. But the incident for which 1858 is to be noted was the receipt by Prestwich of a letter from Hugh Falconer, written from Abbeville, when on his way to Sicily for the winter. The results to which it led M. BOUCHER DE PERTHES. JET. 46.] BOUCHER DE PERTHES. 119 were so important, bringing about so suddenly a re- volution of opinion in the scientific world, that we transcribe it in full : — H. Falconer to J. Prestwich. ABBEVILLE, 1st Nov. 1858. MY DEAR PRESTWICH, — As the weather continued fine, I de- termined on coming here to see Boucher de Perthes' collection. I advised him of my intention from London, and my note luckily found him in the neighbourhood. He good-naturedly came in to receive me, and I have been richly rewarded. His collection of wrought flint implements and of the objects of every description associated with them far exceeds anything I expected to have seen, especially from a single locality. He had made great additions, since the publication of his first volume, in the second — which I have now by me. He showed me "flint" hatchets which lie had dug up with his oiim hands mixed indiscriminately with the molars of E. primigenius. I examined and identified plates of the molars — and the flint objects, which were got along with them. Abbeville is an out-of-the-way place, very little visited, and the French savants who meet him in Paris laugh at Monsieur de Perthes and his researches. But after devoting the greater part of a day to his vast collection, I am perfectly satis- fied that there is a great deal of fair presumptive evidence in favour of many of his speculations regarding the remote anti- quity of these industrial objects, and their association with animals now extinct. Monsieur Boucher's hotel is from ground- floor to garret a continued museum filled with pictures, medieval art, and Gaulish antiquities, including antediluvian flint knives, fossil bones, &c. If, during next summer, you should happen to be paying a visit to France, let me strongly recommend you to come to Abbeville. You could leave the following morning by an 8 A.M. train to Paris, and I am sure you would be richly rewarded. You are the only English geologist I know of who would go into the subject con amore. I am satisfied that English geologists are much behind the indications of the materials now in existence relative to this walk of post - glacial geology, and you are the man to bring up the leeway. Boucher de Perthes is a very courteous elderly French gentleman, the head of an 120 BBIXHAM CAVE. [l859. old and affluent family, and, if you wrote to him beforehand, he would feel your visit a compliment and treat it as such. I saw no flint specimens in his collection so completely whitened through and through as our flint knives — and nothing exactly like the mysterious hatchet which I made up of the two pieces. What I have seen here gives me still greater impulse to persevere in our Brixham exploration. . . . — Yours very truly, H. FALCONER. The following letter, which is dated London, 4th February 1859, and refers to Brixham Cave, is ad- dressed to Falconer, who was then in Palermo :— J. Prestwich to H. Falconer. MY DEAR FALCONER, — . . . Austen is satisfied that the flint instruments occur with the bones. After my last visit I cannot deny it, but still I am not satisfied without seeking every other possible explanation besides that of contemporaneous existence. None of the evidence which has come before me during the last ten years has appeared to me conclusive, and now we have an opportunity of settling the question more satisfactorily, we can- not be too cautious. Austen and I spent a day at the cave, and left Bristow 1 there to take a plan and sections. This was in November. From several causes we have not yet reed, these documents, but we are now positively promised them. I understand they were not quite finished. When we have them before us we shall, now we have the money in hand, decide how next to proceed. The works have not been interrupted except for a week at Christmas. For some weeks past but little has been found — the greater part of the loam has been removed, and we are down to the gravel. After our visit in November we decided not to purchase the adjoining right of search. It was a gallery traversing the next quarry, and the greater part of [which] was worked away. We have plenty to do in the body of the hill. We left instructions to have all the bones packed up and sent to the Geological 1 H. W. Bristow, F.R.S., in later years Director of the Geological Survey of England and Wales ; born 1817, died 1889. Mi. 47-] CAVES NEAR PALERMO. 121 Society. They are not yet arrived. Pengelly has so much to do, and is, poor fellow, just now greatly troubled by the failing health of a daughter. We had an interview with Vivian, which ended amicably, and by his consenting to withhold the publication of his notes on Kent's Cave, to which are appended numerous notes respecting the Brixham Cave. Austen and I do not exactly agree about our report ; but nothing less will satisfy rne than a full and complete examination of every part of the cave (now worked), the emptying to the very bottom of everything in the several galleries. I am very glad you stopped at Abbeville, and am thereby fully confirmed to visit that locality at an early opportunity, and, as you suggest, to make the acquaintance of M. Boucher de Perthes. I trust you are enjoying fine weather, good health, and many caves. — Believe me, my dear Falconer, very truly yours, Jos. PKESTWICH. The wish expressed in the last sentence of the above letter with regard to caves was literally fulfilled. It found Falconer at Palermo in ecstasy about his dis- covery of flint implements associated with fossil bones in the cave of Maccagnone. He was also zealously engaged in making collections of hippopotamus teeth, which lay scattered in great quantity, with a few molars and bones of other extinct animals, outside the " Grotto di San Giro" or "Mare Dolce," near Palermo, and where the women and children gathered them on the field in front of the cave in the intervals between his daily visits. It was a comical scene when an infant in arms, prompted by its mother, held out a tooth of hippopotamus to Dr Falconer, clasped by its tiny fingers. On one occasion forty-two mothers and children awaited his arrival, each provided with spoil. The mothers thought themselves liberally rewarded with a few quattrini, the smallest Sicilian coin. April was the date in 1859 when Prestwich pro- 122 BOUCHER DE PERTHES. [l859. ceeded to Abbeville to make the acquaintance of M. Boucher de Perthes, whom he found a hale, hearty septuagenarian, enthusiastic, as well he might be, about his collection of flint implements. In France he was well known as an antiquary and archaeologist and a voluminous writer of light literature, — perhaps no man was ever more possessed by the cacoethes scribendi,— yet in England few had ever heard mention of his name. Although not a geologist, his name is so inseparably associated with the discovery of flint im- plements in beds of Quaternary age in France, that a few notes to recount his discoveries may not be out of place. With a far-seeing sagacity which cannot but excite our admiration, M. de Perthes had predicted the cer- tainty of his finding traces of man in the gravels of the Abbeville and Amiens district, and had during several years closely watched the excavations for the construc- tion of a canal at Abbeville. Hence when in 1846 he announced the discovery of an ancient flint imple- ment in gravel of the " Drift," associated with bones of elephant, rhinoceros, and other extinct animals, and when again in 1849 he asserted that numbers of rudely worked and chipped flint implements had been found with remains of extinct mammalia in the same undisturbed beds of gravel, geologists gave no heed to his announcement, and he was regarded as an amiable visionary. He challenged his countrymen to put his startling theory of so high an antiquity for his flint weapons to the test and make excavations for them- selves in unbroken ground, but he was only laughed at. Dr Rigollot of Amiens appears to have been the one person in France who came forward expressing his dissent from the universal unbelief. He had been &l. 47.] ANTIQUITY OF MAN. 123 a vehement opposer of the views of M. de Perthes until he had personally examined the ground and the evidence, when his opinions underwent a complete change, and he became one of the strongest advocates for the recognition of the worked flints. Throughout the whole of this famous inquiry, which had been prompted by that letter of 1st November, 1858, from Hugh Falconer, with characteristic gener- osity the latter invariably assigned the precedence to Prestwich, saying, " What I did was to stir up the embers of your interest in the matter into a quick flame." In a chapter on " Primeval Man and his Contem- poraries," 1 Falconer remarks of MM. de Perthes and Eigollot, that— The observations of both were either scorned or discredited. At the same time a quiet observer, of matchless sagacity and indomitable perseverance, Mr Prestwich, was making the Gravels in England an object of special investigation. Engaged during a long course of years upon the study of the European Tertiaries, he gradually worked his way up to the superficial deposits. Mr Prestwich's researches upon the Tertiaries, which have only been partially published, have earned for him the reputation of being one of the ablest geological observers of his time. But in the Quaternary sands and gravels he was unrivalled. Men have been in the habit of saying, in mingled earnest and raillery, that " point out a broken pebble amongst a thousand others in a gravel pit, and there is one who will tell you the point of the compass from which it came, the stratum which yielded it, the distance it had travelled, the amount of rolling it had undergone, and the time it had occupied in the journey." The power thus acquired was soon to be applied with clenching authority to the proofs of the antiquity of man yielded by those deposits. On his memorable visit to Abbeville in April, Prest- 1 Hugh Falconer : ' Palseont. Memoirs,' vol. ii. p. 584. 124 AMIENS AND ABBEVILLE. [l859. wich had been joined a few hours after arrival by Evans ; l and next day, on account of a telegram re- ceived, they went together to Amiens, where they saw an implement in situ in the gravel, and had the section photographed. The great caution exercised by our geologist in accepting no evidence except that which he had himself personally investigated was proverbial. In this case his decision was quickly made. On the 26th of May — one month after his arrival at Amiens — his great paper, " On the Occurrence of Flint-imple- ments, associated with Remains of Animals of Extinct Species in Beds of a Late Geological Period, in France at Amiens and Abbeville, and in England at Hoxne," was read before the Royal Society. Before the completion of this memoir he made a second expedition to the Abbeville district, accompanied by Messrs Godwin -Austen, J. Wickham Flower, and R. W. Mylne. This again was followed by a brief visit from Sir Charles Lyell, who happened to be in Paris at the same time. Sir C. Lyell to J. Prestwick. 45 RUE DE PONTHIETT, Mli April [May ?]. MY DEAR PRESTWICH, — I will be in time for the 4 P.M. train, and shall have an opportunity of talking over what you have seen at Joinville as we go to Precy together, and compare notes, as I have already seen C. D'Orbigny's section. I shall go direct to Amiens, as I cannot stand getting there in the middle of the night. It would unfit me for next day's work at Amiens. In case your letters prevent you starting, I may say that I shall go at any rate to Amiens to the Hotel de France et d'Angleterre. I shall hope at any rate to have the journey together to Precy and to work next morning at Amiens. — Ever most truly yours, CHA. LYELL. 1 Now Sir John Evans, K.C.B. .ET, . 47.] HOXNE. 125 J. Prestwich to J. Evans. LONDON, istk May 1859. MY DEAR EVANS, — I shall be restless until I visit Hoxne, especially as I wish to see it before my paper is read (which must be next week, if at all). So I want you to be so good as let me postpone my visit for a day or two. Cannot you come to Hoxne with me next Saturday at 3 P.M. and return on Monday evening? At all events I will, if convenient to you, take an early afternoon train to Nash Mills on Tuesday and report pro- gress, and return on Wednesday morning. I should then equally see you and have the pleasure of the introduction which you promised me. I would have gone to Hoxne last Saturday, but did not like going there without you if possible, so I went en attendant to Salisbury, but without any success. I have found out three brick pits at or near Hoxne, and hope to find traditions of the discovery and to have a trench dug on the right spot. — I am, ever truly yours, Jos. PRESTWICH. I enclose you two letters just received from M. de Perth es. I shall want a few lines from you for the Eoyal. . . . This expedition to Hoxne, in Suffolk, was the result of Mr Evans having come across some flint implements found there in the end of the last century by Mr John Frere, F.R.S., — to be seen in the museum of the Society of Antiquaries. Mr Evans's attention had at the time also been called by the late Sir A. Wollaston Franks to a flint implement found in Gray's Inn Lane, and preserved in the British Museum, and of which he (Mr Evans) gave notice in a paper to the Society of Antiquaries. This flint implement is notable as being the first discovered in Quaternary gravels in this or any other country. The paper was read on 2nd June 1859, a week after Prestwich's communication to the Royal Society. This latter made a great sensation, demonstrating as it did that a large portion of the flints in M. de Perthes' collection were of human 126 FLINT IMPLEMENTS. [1859. workmanship, and pointing out their undoubted geo- logical position. We quote one or two passages from the abstract of this paper : — At Abbeville the author was much struck with the extent of M. Boucher de Perthes' collection. There were many forms of flints, in which he, however, failed to see traces of design and work, and which he should only consider as accidental ; but with regard to those flint-instruments termed " axes " (haches) by M. de Perthes, he entertains not the slightest doubt of their artificial make. They are of two forms, generally from 4 to 10 inches long, . . . and were the work of a people probably unacquainted with the use of metals. The author was not fortunate to find any specimens himself,1 but from the experience of M. de Perthes, and the evidence of the workmen, as well as from the condition of the specimens themselves, he is fully satisfied of the correctness of that gentleman's opinion, that they there also occur in beds of undisturbed sand and gravel.2 With regard to the geological age of these beds, the author refers them to those usually designated Post-Pliocene (Pleisto- cene), and notices their agreement with many beds of that age in England. Finally, our geologist stated that he — Purposely abstained for the present from all theoretical con- siderations, confining himself to the corroboration of the facts : — 1. That the flint implements are the work of man. 2. That they were found in undisturbed ground. 3. That they are associated with the remains of extinct mammalia. 1 This only refers to the large worked haches. On his first visit to Menche- court, the day after his arrival at Abbeville, he was fortunate enough to obtain in one excavation he had made to a depth of about 20 feet beneath the surface, several fine flint flakes with large bulbs of percussion in a bed with abundant remains of the mammoth and other extinct mammalia. 2 Subsequently, Prestwich was summoned by a telegram from Paris, to which he responded by going to St Acheul, and finding an implement in situ. A CONFERENCE ON FLINT IMPLEMENTS. Prof. JOHN MORRIS. F. E. EDWARDS. JOSEPH PRESTWICH. SEARLES V. WOOD. ^T. 47.] ANTIQUITY OF MAN. 127 4. That the period was a late geological one, and anterior to the surface assuming its present outline, so far as some of its minor features are concerned. He does not, however, consider that the facts as they at present stand of necessity carry back man in past time more than they bring forward the great extinct mammals towards our own time, the evidence having reference only to relative and not to absolute time ; and he is of opinion that many of the later geological changes may have been sudden, or of shorter duration than generally considered. In fact, from the evidence here ex- hibited, and from all that he knows regarding Drift phenomena generally, the author sees no reason against the conclusion that this period of man and the extinct mammalia — supposing their contemporaneity to be proved — was brought to a sudden end by a temporary inundation of the land : on the contrary, he sees much to support such a view on purely geological considerations. Before writing this paper, Prestwich, together with Mr Evans, had made a searching examination of the flints and gravels of Amiens as well as of Abbeville. Both being experts in different departments — one from his practical knowledge of geology, especially of the more recent deposits, and the other holding the fore- most rank in archaeology — their joint opinion carried great weight. Thus when their belief became public, that M. de Perthes had made an important discovery, and that a large proportion of the flint implements in his collection were what he had claimed them to be, men of science on both sides of the Channel cast away their doubts and unbelief. Geologists hastened to Abbeville to give their congratulations to M. Boucher de Perthes, whose letters of this date, addressed to Falconer and to Prestwich, are expressive of lively gratitude. This gratitude, however, had previously been tempered. It devolved on his English friends to point out to M. de Perthes several spurious flint 128 FORGED IMPLEMENTS. [l859. implements in his great collection, in the authenticity of which he himself had implicit faith. These carefully worked counterfeits lacked the vitreous glaze and the staining of true implements, now termed " pakeolithic," which the dishonest fabricator had been unable to re- produce. M. de Perthes had recklessly held out too tempting rewards for every implement found, and had probably paved the way for these forgeries which were readily detected by the experts, but they did not for a moment invalidate the evidence afforded by the many genuine flint implements. Among the letters addressed to Prestwich, none throw more light on the questions which at that date occupied the minds of geologists than those from Mr Godwin-Austen. One more example is given in which is expressed, as usual, his delightful sense of humour: — R A. C. Godwin- Austen to J. Prestwich. CHILWORTH, June 13 [1859 ?]. MY DEAR PRESTWICH, — I have two of yours unanswered : the first is as to whether " Quaternary " would not be a better word than "Post-Pliocene." Most decidedly so, for I hope to see Eocene, Miocene, Pliocene, and all their degrees ere long banished from geological nomenclature. Their introduction was a worse event for geology than even De Beaumont's mountain-systems. I could not get away on Saturday : an old schoolfellow, wife, and children came here. The Antiquity of Man question, in respect of which Owen now has his say, is doomed to be damaged by bad evidence and worse reasoning. I have long seen what the fate of the geologist would be from the time that he allied himself with the anthroDologist A. O and antiquarian. Falconer and Evans are to us what the two cunning Greeks were who conducted the fatal horse into Troy. The only thing that can save us is to restrict us to the Silurian system for a year or so. — Believe me, yours ever truly, EGBERT A. C. GODWIN-AUSTEN. J3T. 47.] BRIXHAM CAVE. 129 While Prestwich's researches in the valley of the Somme had come to so successful an issue, he was ever watchful of the evidence afforded by the excavations in Brixham and other caverns, as will be seen by the following letter :— J. Prestwich to H. Falconer. [22nd June.] MY DEAR FALCONER, — I have just received your note. Little need be said about Brixham Cave, as your Palermo cave will be the main business of the evening. Still I think some notice desirable. It is not necessary to give all particulars — a slight sketch will suffice. The subject is altogether new at the Society. Ramsay's plan is quite sufficient to give a general idea of the place, and an abstract of your first report will give all the main points. I can speak about all the later facts (which are few), and I have asked Austen to bring his report, and written to Bristow to ask him for his. I think it important to bring all forward, as the two cases you have discovered so strongly support one another. — In haste, yours, &c. J. PRESTWICH. In the Journal of the Geological Society it is stated that- On June 22, 1859, Joseph Prestwich, Esq., F.R.S., gave in a few words the results of the examination of the Bone-cave at Brixham in Devonshire. The cave had been traced along three large galleries, meeting or intersecting one another at right angles. Numerous bones of Rhinoceros tichorhinus, Bos, Equus, Cervus tarandus, Ursus spelceus, and Hycena have been found, and several flint-imple- ments have been met with in the cave-earth and gravel beneath. One in particular was met with immediately beneath a fine antler of a Eeindeer and a bone of the Cave-bear, which were imbedded in the superficial stalagmite in the middle of the cave.1 1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xvi. p. 189. See also remarks on the exploration of Brixham Cavern, in Appendix, by Prof. T. G. Bonney, F.R.S., to the 'Memoir of William Pengelly,' by his Daughter, 1897, pp. 296-300. 130 BRIXHAM CAVE. [l859. H. Falconer to J. Prestwich. 31 SACKVILLE STREET, W., 25th June 1859. MY DEAR PRESTWICH, — Many thanks for both your kind notes. I feel exceedingly obliged by the lively interest which you have taken in the Brixham Cave matter throughout. It is your cordial co-operation that has led to so much being effected. If the special results as at present disclosed are not very striking, the indirect consequences have been of great importance in launching the question of the antiquity of human remains in a fair and unprejudiced manner. Much attention will now be directed to the subject everywhere, by inquirers of every shade of belief, and we will arrive at the truth shortly. There is nothing that you have done in the matter in which I would not have joined. . . . In the Maccagnone cave there was ample work for a pair of collaborateurs for months. I pretend to have done nothing more than score the first lines. Many thanks for Vivian's edition of M'Enery. I have referred to Desnoyer's paper, but can find notice only of bones on the walls, not on the roof of the bone cavern. We must make an effort to bring out the plates of M'Enery's fossils, &c. If the Palseontographical will not do it, we must set a subscription on foot. — Yours very truly, H. FALCONER. J. Prestwich to H. Falconer. SUFFOLK LANE, 28th June 1859. MY DEAR FALCONER, — Thanks for your note. I quite agree with you that it is not the importance and beauty of the specimens that constitute the value of the Brixham Cave. I have constantly heard it objected that we have got but a poor collection of specimens. No doubt Kent's Cave would yield a richer store ; but that is a subordinate consideration. The great object effected at Brixham is the complete and thorough exam- ination of our cave, the number of the bones, the relative number of each set and of each animal, their condition, their place, &c., &c. Besides, there are all the sections and valuable physical data obtained, and which could have been obtained by no other means. So that if we cannot show fine specimens, JST. 47.] FOSSIL ELEPHANTS. 131 we shall at all events be able to exhibit a yet more valuable, because rarer, array of figures and facts. . . . You will find a notice by Tournal of bones adhering to the roof in the 2nd vol. ' Bull. Soc. Geol.,' p. 381 ; and again by Teissier, same vol., pp. 22 and 56. Marcel de Serres also some- where notices the same fact — I think in a cavern in the Pyrenees. I will try and find out the reference. On Saturday I was at Erith, where it seems to me the E. primigenius and E. antiquus occur together. On Sunday I saw only some Tertiary sections. J. Prestwich to Sir Charles Lyell. 28, 6, 59. MY DEAR SIR CHARLES, — A main object of our visit to Erith was to see whether the E. primigenius and E. antiquus occur there in different beds. We found nothing in situ to settle the question ; but a careful inspection of Mr Spurrell's collection leads me to the belief that no separation can at present be made. The greater number of teeth in Mr Spurrell's collection are of the E. primigenius. I saw only two of the E. antiquus. In universal character no distinction could be made. Still, the evidence is not complete. The Menchecourt species is, however, decidedly the E. primigenius; and then we have the Cyrena fluminalis. As to the question you ask me about the Shackle- well Gravel, it is a question I have asked myself the last fifteen years without being able to feel certain about an answer. My opinion long inclined to the belief that the Grays deposit is newer than the Boulder Clay ; these other gravels of the Thames valley are consequently of the same recent age. Of late I have not felt so sure. I find the Boulder Clay sweeping down to a very low level in Essex. I find also that many rock specimens I referred to the Boulder Clay may also be referred to the great Western Drift, and I am not yet satisfied that I have got the correlation of these two drifts. I hope this summer to be able to work up all my evidence and go through all my collections. I must also again visit a few places in the eastern counties. I shall then begin with the Clay and work upwards, when I hope to find the difficulties which now perplex me disappear as they are handled in right succession. My impression at present is 132 BRIXHAM CAVE. [l859. certainly that part of the materials of the Thames valley gravel is derived from the Boulder Clay, or from a led of gravel imme- diately preceding it — that the Cyrena lived with the Mammoth, and that the E. antiquus is not confined to the age of the Bacton Beds. As to the gravel under the Cyrena -bed at Clapton, it contains, I think, almost all the specimens we saw at Victoria Park. Ten years since, I daresay I should have given you more definite answers ; but the more I see of the subject, the more I feel involved in its complications. I see some objections to almost every position. . . . — Believe me to be very truly yours, J. PRESTWICH. J. Prestwich to H. Falconer. 2nd July 1859. MY DEAR FALCONER, — . . . The points for your inspection are in the first two papers. About the Brixham Cave, have I rightly expressed myself about the Eeport to the Geological Society, or shall I mention it in any other way ? That to you the discovery is due is certain, inasmuch as the cave was started by you and worked in your way; that the weight of your opinion also led us all to consider the matter more serious, and seriously, is also certain. So you are the head and front of the cave, and the leader of this new inquiry, and as such you must allow me to place you. Will you therefore kindly look to these two pages and make such additions, alterations, &c., as you think fit? . . . I am not sure now that I have said all that I want; but these letters coming in the hours of business, and on a busy Saturday, leave me but little time for consideration. Pray, however, consider me always, &c., J. PRESTWICH. J. Prestwich to Sir Charles Lyell. 2 SUFFOLK LANE, 6th July 1859. MY DEAR SIR CHARLES, — You have planned a charming ex- cursion, and I wish I could meet you at Amiens or Rouen ; but I doubt whether I shall be able. I shall probably return there later. At present the levels of the different pits are being accurately taken. For these I shall, I believe, be indebted to the Government engineers. Nothing can be done at present in collecting shells at Menchecourt, as the sands in which they ME. 47.] CYKENA. 133 are found are 5 or 6 feet beneath the bottom of the pit, and are only worked in winter. I had three trenches dug, but they were not left open. M. Marcotte, a friend of M. de Perthes, promised to collect for me all he could in the course of the autumn or winter. There is no Pharmacien there who could do it. If you have a trench dug, let it be near where my first trench was. At the last two I had dug I found nothing of importance. Of the sand itself you will find a good heap collected in one part of the pit, and will find plenty of fresh-water and land shells ; but various shells are very rare. I got a few fragments ; but all my present specimens come from the first trench, so also the Cyrena. As for the Cyrena, here we found it on Saturday week high up in the section in Simpson's pit at Erith ; and you may remember that Mr Meeson found a Gryphcea incurva in the ground quite at the bottom of his pit at Grays. Was this from the Boulder Clay ? I have never seen one in the Western Drift. As for these two Drifts, after great work I imagined I had found the latter superimposed on the former on the top of a hill near Brandon ; whilst last year I found the Boulder Clay in a valley near St Albans, with the Western Drift capping the hills flank- ing this valley, and therefore apparently older than the B. Clay. I must get a third case to serve as umpire. I think the Cyrena existed at the time of the ElepJias primi- genius both at Erith and Menchecourt. Ilford and Grays I am not certain about ; but I have my doubts. The fact is, we have many places where the Cyrena occurs; but unfortunately from all the elephants having been E. primigenius formerly, sufficient information of the exact fact is now wanting, owing to many specimens having been overlooked, and not collected, or lost. When you go to the Norfolk Cliffs, look again at Mundesley. I have been there three times, and on each occasion came to the conclusion that the shell- and peat -bed there was above the Boulder Clay. On the last occasion I, however, found another bed of shells under the B. Clay. As for the exact order of succession, it is so complicated that, as often as I imagined I had detected it, as often have I 134 FLINT IMPLEMENTS. [1859. been thrown out again. When I think about it, some 300 or 400 sections and facts flit before me, some tempting me one way and some another, until I feel fairly bewildered. In the great coast sections the matter is clear enough, but when we come inland the confusion is great. You have given two or three of the leading periods in your note, possibly correctly. I herewith give you these and some minor ones. I do not attempt any order, but give them in round-robin fashion, merely to show you what we want room for. I do, however, hope this summer to reduce all my observations, when I Hope all will fall into proper order ; and I am, my dear Sir Charles, yours very truly, J. PRESTWICH. Satisfied by the success of his memoir to the Royal Society, Prestwich addressed a letter to the French Academy of Sciences urging the significance of M. de Perthes' discoveries. The title of this paper was, " Sur la Decouverte d'Instruments en Silex associes a des Restes de Mammiferes d'Especes perdues dans des Couches non - remaniees d'une Formation geologique recente," and it was published in the ' Comptes Rendus' for 1859. The effect of this communication was that his friend M. Albert Gaudry, a distinguished member of the Institute, visited Abbeville and Amiens to examine the implements and the flint-bearing beds. He found worked flints in situ, and his researches con- firmed M. de Perthes' statements : his report had the effect in Paris that the paper to the Royal Society had in England, and a French pilgrimage to the valley of the Somme began, headed by well-known members of the Institute, among whom were MM. de Quatrefages, Lartet, Hebert, and many others. J. Prestwich to Sir Charles LyelL nth August 1859, LONDON. MY DEAR SIR CHARLES, — I was very glad to receive your letter and account of your visit to Abbeville and Amiens. I will answer your questions categorically. My Cyrena is JST. 47.] SEQUENCE OF DRIFTS. 135 nearly perfect. The most important part of the hinge remains, viz., that part showing striations. Morris has seen it, and there can, I think, be little doubt of it. It is about the size of the one from Shacklewell. I found 1 Purpura lapillus, 4 Littorina littorea, 1 Buccinum, 3 Tellina, 1 Cardium. These shells are scarce and uncertain. On my second visit, although two deep trenches were dug, not one marine specimen was obtained. My first trench went down to the hard conglomerate rock — 3 or 4 feet beneath the flints. I saw Drucat on my last visit and was much interested with the section. M. Boucher de Perthes gave me a flint implement from that locality. . . . I have often seen the loess, both in France and Belgium, on different levels. A good exhibition of this occurs at St Peter's Mount, Maestricht. I don't believe in the faults. With regard to the age of the Eed Clay Drift with meulieres around Paris, I am perfectly satisfied in my own mind that it is older than the drift of the valleys with land and fresh-water shells, bones, and granite, and that the valleys were excavated after the spread of the up-level Eed Clay Drift. I missed Chartres on my last visit to France. I was going there, but waiting for some of my companions from England (who never came), I was detained in Paris until too late in the day. It is a place well worth visiting, as are also the others you name. I am inclined to think Moulin Quignon older than Menche- court. I would not, however, assert that opinion. So I think St Acheul older than St Eoch. This is in physical evidence, but the other evidence is so curious that I must again go over the ground and examine all the collateral facts before venturing at a conclusion. I should not be surprised at all proving of the same age, or nearly so. I shall certainly go [to] Boves, and will write to M. Pinsard. I also saw one very white flint implement (in M. Boucher de Perthes' collection) with red clay adhering to it. It was from St Eiquier. I do not remember one (white) with ochre, sand, or earth. I am going out of town this afternoon for a day or two, and next week I start for Wales, but I doubt whether I shall be at Aberdeen. I shall be very glad, therefore, of a few lines 136 CHARLES KINGSLEY. [l859. to inform me of the result of your visit to Le Puy, and with thanks for your last long letter, I am, ever truly yours, J. PRESTWICH. I enclose you a curious proces verbal I have received from M. de Perthes. Please return it to him if you pass through Abbeville. The following letter from the Rev. Charles Kingsley must have given pleasure to our geologist :— EVERSLEY KECTORY, WINCHFIELD, C. Kingsley to J. Prestwich. August 26, 1859. MY DEAR Sm, — I have to thank you for — what I had no right to expect — sending me your pamphlet on the flint arrow- heads of Abbeville, &c. From your conclusion there can be no dissent. I, last of all men, should wish to impugn it from other causes : I have long expected some such discovery. I regret much that I missed Dr Falconer's paper on the Brixham Cave. Perhaps you would kindly tell me where I can obtain it. You, I am sure, will appreciate the immense importance of your own statement. If corroborated, it must lead to a recon- sideration and rearrangement of beliefs, as well as of geologic theories. It seems to me the greatest stride forward which has been made since the Semitic tradition of the six-days' creation was abandoned as untenable. That religious persons will be angry, and try to crush the truth, you must expect. But I must compliment you on the modesty and tact with which you have at least staved off the evil day, by confining yourself to facts, and building no theories on them. By such a method, sound science will gain a firm root in thinking minds before the ignorant and suspicious public is even aware of its existence. I must take this opportunity of expressing to you my deep obligations, as to the man who has taught me to find boundless interest and instruction in those barren Bagshot Sands on which I live, and hope to die.— Believe me, ever yours, C. KINGSLEY. Ignorant of your address, I send this to Burlington House. MT. 47.] CAVES IN WALES. 137 Prestwich, eagerly on the track of any other evidence which might throw light on the antiquity of man, joined Falconer in the autumn of 1859 in an inspection of the ossiferous caves of Gower in Glamorganshire, when they were the guests at Stouthall of their kind friends, Col- onel and Mrs Wood. Falconer had visited the caves in 1858 with Colonel Wood, who for a series of years had been engaged in excavations in most of the caves in succession. He had discovered and explored several that were previously unknown, and unreservedly had placed his large collections of fossils at Dr Falconer's disposal. He had been a quiet, persevering worker : the contents of cave after cave had been exhumed at his own charge and without public recognition. Before joining Falconer for the work in Gower, Prestwich made a geological tour in Wales, extending over several weeks. He was in quest of Drift, Boulder Clay, and ice action, and had in view a personal exam- ination of the slopes of Moel Tryfaen, where shells had been found at a height of 1360 feet underneath a mass of Boulder Clay. Step by step, halting at very many stages, the ground was traversed from Oxford on to St Asaph, where another visit to Cefn Cave1 was irresistible. /. Prestwich to If, Falconer. LLANBERIS, Septr. 7/59. MY DEAR FALCONER, — On receipt of your first note I wrote you a few lines from Ludlow, and hoped they would have reached Bryn Elwy before your departure. I missed you by one day, as I arrived on Friday evening. I was most kindly and hospitably received by your friend Captn. Thomas, who met me at the station — otherwise I should have gone to the inn, as I intended staying but one day, and it happened to be the first week in Sep- 1 Since described by Professor T. M'K. Hughes, F.K.S., Journ. An- thropological Inst., vol. iii. p. 387. 138 ICE- ACTION IN WALES. [l859. tember. The following morning we drove over to Cefn : the day was fine, and we had a most delightful walk back. The geo- logical interest also I found great. We remained some time in the cave, and I was fortunate enough to find a considerable number of fragments of bones and two nearly perfect teeth. I packed them up as I disinterred them, and have not looked at them since. One, I think, was the tooth of a deer ; the other was too much enveloped in its matrix to say what it was. I left Bryn Elwy on Saturday evening, examined the coast section at Llandudno, and 'am now here to see the Drift and ice- action around Snowdon. I remain here until Tuesday morning next, then proceed to Carnarvon, Tremadoc, and Cardigan to Swansea, which I hope to reach either on Monday or Tuesday week next, and still, I trust, in time to find you there. Please, however, write me a line per return to this place, to say the latest day to which you will remain at Stouthall, and I will do my best to have a day with you there. — I am, most truly yours, J. PKESTWICH. After noting in detail the glacial features of Con way and Capel Curig, he lingered in the neighbourhood of Cwm Glas over the roches moutonnees and blocs perches, and gives a striking view in a few touches of the entrance below Cwm Glas. In short, the geo- logy of this particular district fascinated him, and it was with evident reluctance that he tore himself away. " The sides of Cwm Glas up to the little tarn show traces of rounded and striated rocks. They remind me of the small side glaciers pendent on the mountain-sides between the Glacier des Bois and Montanvert. I could not recognise any terminal moraine. The moraine at the entrance of Cwm seemed to me to be part of the great lateral moraine of the main valley of Llanberis." x 1 It may be interesting to mention that Kamsay's account of " The Old Glaciers of Switzerland and North Wales" was first published in 1859 as one of the chapters in ' Peaks, Passes, and Glaciers,3 by members of the Alpine Club. It was reprinted as a separate volume in 1860. .ET. 47.] GOWER CAVES. 139 On September 12th he ascended Snowdon, next day proceeding to Carnarvon, and afterwards to Clynnog. Taking a circuitous route, he arrived at Stouthall from Swansea on the 20th. Next day, with the assistance and local knowledge of Colonel Wood, he commenced the joint investigation with Falconer of the caves on the picturesque coast of Gower. To quote the words of Falconer, " Its line of coast stretches from the ' Mumbles ' on the E. to the ' Worm's Head ' on the W., and with the indentations of Port Eynon, Oxwich, and smaller bays, it presents an iron-bound wall of bold, lofty, and precipitous or scarped cliffs, occasionally exhibiting features of the grandest description." The best known of the caverns, which are at different heights above the sea, are " Bacon Hole," " Bosco's Den," "Minchin Hole," "Long Hole," and " Eaven's Cliff." These all occur in this southern range of cliffs between Worm's Head and the " Mumbles." Nor must " Paviland Cave " be omitted, which was de- scribed in 1821 by Dr Buckland, and where the fragmentary skeleton of a woman was found. The bones were stained red ; thus the skeleton was known in Gower as " The Red Lady of Paviland." How the poor human form was introduced into this cave, and came to be found in association with tusks and remains of elephant, is a problem that will never be solved. The generally accepted explanation is that the body was brought and laid there for burial. One of the best -known of the caves is " Spritsail Tor," situated to the west of the Gower Peninsula and facing Carmarthen Bay. It was discovered by quarrymen in 1839, who had cut back into the Car- boniferous Limestone. Although of comparatively small 140 GOWER CAVES. [l859. size, it yielded a large quantity of fossils. In 1849 it was thoroughly explored by Colonel Wood, who de- tected a second entrance. As a whole, the fossil remains from the Gower caves, which varied in each case in numbers and species, were of surpassing interest. Teeth of Elephas antiquus and of E. primigenius ; teeth and bones of Rhinoceros Jiemitcechus and Rh. tichorhinus ; bones of Bear and Hycena were found ; but in quantity and in number of species the remains of deer were in the greatest abundance, especially those of the Cervus Guettardi. In a list of fossil bones from " Long Hole " given in a posthumous note to Dr Falconer's ' Ossiferous Caves of Gower/ two species of Elephas, two of Rhinoceros, two of Equus, and four of Deer, &c., are given. Also it is recorded that " flint implements, unquestionably of human manufacture, were found along with these fossil remains, and were sent to me by Colonel Wood. One very fine flint arrow-head was found contiguous to, and at the same depth as, a detached shell of a milk molar of R. hemitcechus" It was on this joint visit to Gower in 1859 by Falconer and Prestwich that the keen eye of the latter discovered a raised beach in Mewslade Bay, a mile in length, "perched upon the out-cropping edges of the limestone strata of the old cliff, which is but very little changed in the shape of its escarpment since the beach was formed, although still in close proximity to the sea." He made an attempt to reach " Bosco's Den," but found entrance impossible. The entry in his note- book records that, " descending to the coast after [his examination of Paviland Cave], I found a superb raised beach thickly covered with angular debris. The JET. 47.] BOUCHER DE PERTHES. 141 * head ' decreases, but the raised beach continues to nearly opposite the Worm's Head. Then passing round to shore on w. side (Rhos Sili Bay), the fine bold cliffs are precipitous, with no traces of a raised beach. Passing Rh6s Sili, the shore becomes more shelving, and a mass of debris in clay slopes down the hill. Farther on a low cliff commences, appar- ently Boulder Clay. Farther on a seam of shingle sets in, and in it I found several shells — perfect and broken," &c. Prestwich returned to town after this interesting exploration of the Gower coast, yet he was again westward as far as Salisbury in the end of October. One cannot resist giving a quotation from a humor- ous note of Dr Falconer's ; it is dated about a year after his first visit to Abbeville :— LONDON, 4 Milliard, Southampton. PROFESSOR T. RUPERT JONES, F.R.S. MS. 82.] PROFESSOR T. RUPERT JONES. 377 one knows how much she was to me in early life," was his remark in a note to a friend. Thus for a time the serene happiness of his home was overclouded. In the autumn of 1894, under Prestwich's personal supervision, Professor Rupert Jones prepared a paper, with diagrams, treating of the plateau implements, their position below the surface, and the derivation of the gravelly deposits in which they occur, from the Chalk capping the Wealden area when it existed as part of a range at least 2000 feet high. This paper was read before a combined meeting of the Anthropo- logical and Geological sections of the British Association on August 10, 1894, and published in ' Natural Science/ vol. v. pp. 269-275. In it occurs the appropriate remark that " it must have been a great pleasure to the veteran geologist, Professor Dr Prestwich, to find that his conclusions (in 1890) as to the Pliocene Tertiaries and Gravels on the flanks of the diminishing island of the Weald fitted so truly, as consecutive history, with his early views (1847) of the probable conditions of the Wealden dome in Eocene times." The letter from Canon Greenwell, a leading author- ity on the subject of flint implements, gives his opinion of the plateau implements :— Canon Greenwell to J. Prestwich. DURHAM, 29th Sept. 1894. MY DEAR SIR, — I am obliged for your paper on the " Flints of the Chalk Plateau," which 1 read when it appeared in the Jour- nal. I have no objection to your using my name in the reissue as a believer in the manufacture, by some reasoning creature, of the flints in question. With regard to when they were made, though, so far as I can judge, from the observation of others, they appear to belong to a time anterior to that which produced the ordinary Drift im- 378 CANON GREEN WELL. [1894. plements, I am unable to express an opinion from personal knowledge of the sites, &c. But that they have been made with intention I cannot have the least doubt, for I know of no natural agency which has, or indeed could, produce the signs of work so abundantly shown upon them. I hope some time next year to have an opportunity of seeing the places near Sevenoaks where they have been found. Yours very faithfully, W. GREEN WELL. The following letter from Mr Gladstone is too inter- esting to be omitted : — W. E. Gladstone to J. Prestivich. HAWARDEN CASTLE, CHESTER, 2nd Oct. 1894. MY DEAR SIR, — I thank you very much for the interesting and able Address you have done me the honour to send me, and I desire respectfully as well as sympathetically to mention a circumstance which has long appeared to me worthy of some notice, and which may have a relation to your doctrine of a larger and late submergence. I am in no way competent to touch the relation of that doc- trine to the tradition of the Noachian deluge. And it may seem daring for one who speaks from a standing ground supplied by literature, to attempt joining hands with the geologist across the gap which severs him from history and pre- history as commonly understood. My fact is this : Homer was (in my confident opinion, dictated to me by study of the text) possessed of, and thoroughly pos- sessed by, a tradition, evidently the tradition of his day and people, according to which there lay to the north of the Thracian and Thessalian mountains an open sea ; and by this open sea lay, for him, the communication from Western Greece nomin- atim from Ithaca, with an Underworld to which the approach was situated in the East, and was by his great river Okeanos (in his ideas of which river were probably mixed together vague notices of the Black Sea and Sea of Azof, the Caspian, and the JET. 82.] W. E. GLADSTONE. 379 Persian Gulf). Of the Danube he knew nothing; but he be- lieved in certain inhabited tracts, which he enumerates, to the northward of the Thracian mountains. This purely literary fact has led me often, and from perhaps twenty or thirty years back, to inquire from geological friends, who have assured rne, as you do, that Central Europe was at a very late geologic period under water. It was not for me to consider how this tradition stood related to the mountains (of no very great elevation, I think) which sever Central Europe from the Adriatic. I do not attempt to enter here upon the proof of my Homeric fact, which I think conclusive. But I may mention — is it relevant or not ? — that the Duke of Argyll told me he saw exposed in the fish-markets of Venice sea-fauna (if the phrase may be used) not appearing in the Mediterranean generally, but familiar to him in Argyllshire on the coast of the Atlantic. Your submergence helps me, because it is south as well as north of the mountains which I named. Your supposition of the escape of a part of the local popula- tion leaves room for the transmission of a geological or Quater- nary phenomenon down to (what we call) prehistoric times. There is a kind of sister tradition, that of the Atlantis ; but here it is the ghost of a tradition, for I know of no period in which the Atlantis was the subject of a living popular belief. I apologise for this intrusion, which you will see is intended in a sympathetic sense. I remain, my dear sir, with much re- spect, faithfully yours, W. E. GLADSTONE. From the Same. HAWARDEN CASTLE, CHESTER. MY DEAE SIR, — One word by way of supplement. What you say of your submergence in no way I think conflicts with the idea that it may have had to do with Homer's European sea. That idea may be compounded of the traditions of several sub- mergences, which (traditions) had coalesced into one, just as I think it almost certain that the Homeric notion of a great cir- cumfluent river Okeanos was made up from partial notices of Eastern (as well as Western) water at the Straits of Yenikale, in the Caspian, and in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea. These 380 KOYAL ACADEMY OF THE LINCEI. [1894-95. things may appear strange ; but we have to familiarise ourselves with the position of a race and a poet having extremely narrow maritime experience, and no view or idea of extraneous waters except from very miscellaneous report. Yours very faithfully, W. E. GLADSTONE. A very affectionate letter from Professor Capellini, the distinguished geologist, Rector of the University of Bologna, dated 15th October 1894, informed Joseph Prestwich of his having been elected a corresponding member of the Royal Academy of the Lincei of Rome. The distinction of belonging to this great society was especially prized. Professor Capellini informed the new member that his election had been carried by a " splen- dide votation" and reminded him that it was the greatest honour in the power of the savants of Italy to bestow. Again at this date are frequent notes addressed to the discoverer of the plateau implements. Mr Harri- son was encouraged to persevere, and it was impressed upon him not to be disappointed should these flint im- plements not be universally recognised at once. Joseph Prestwich had more than once fought a battle single- handed, and in the end had always come off victorious. In a note to Mr Harrison of 30th October, he repeats : " I have never had, nor have I now, the slightest doubt about the age and character of the plateau implements. As I have told you all along, it is only a question of time." J. Prestwich to Professor Jules Marcou. DARENT-HULME, SHOREHAM, IQth December 1894. MY DEAR M. MARCOU, — Your kind letter of October last found me in bed, where I had to remain a month, owing to one of my attacks. I am down again now, but not yet allowed to go out. I, however, go on with my work. Your account of the Indian traditions of a flood is very interesting, but seems, from yET. 82-83.] GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF FRANCE. 381 what you say, to refer to a more recent date than that of Western Europe. I am glad to know about the ossiferous fissures of Salins. That falls in with my paper. It is, I admit, a difficult point to account for the absence of marine remains ; but, besides the short duration of the flood, it is to be remembered that the breaking up of the vegetable soil by the advancing waters would render them so turbid that, like with the estuaries of the West African rivers in flood, the waters would be deoxidised and destructive to animal life. Further, any marine life carried inland by the waters would be dropped on the surface and subsequently destroyed by atmospheric in- fluences. Mrs Prestwich joins me in very kind regards, and I am, dear M. Marcou, ever sincerely yours, JOSEPH PRESTWICH. In January 1895 Joseph Prestwich had the gratifica- tion of receiving another testimony of the estimation in which his geological work was held abroad — perhaps in greater estimation abroad than at home. This was his election as one of the Vice-Presidents of the Geological Society of France, he being the first Englishman selected for this honour. It cheered the veteran, then about to complete his eighty- third year, to receive this proof of the constant affection and esteem of his confreres in France. J. Prestwich to M. Albert Gaudry. LONDON, 14